THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY From the Library of the Diocese of Springfield Frotestant Fpiecopal Church Presented 1917 Return this book on or before the Latest Date stamped below. University of Illinois Library liUU L161— H41 Return this book on or before the Latest Date stamped below. L161— H41 ®l)e Clerical Cibrorg. WHIS SERIES of volumes is specially intended A for the clergy and students of all denomina- tions. and is meant to furnish them with stimulus and suggestion in the various departments of their work Amongst the pulpit thinkers from whom these sermon outlines nave been drawn are leading men of almost every denomination, the subjects treated of being of course practical rather than con- troversial. The best thoughts of the est religious writers of the day are here furnished in a condensed form, and at a moderate price. Six volumes in crown 8vo, cloth, are now ready {each colume complete in itself). Price, $1.50. JUST READY— THE NEW VOLUME, Expository Sermons on the Old Testament. ALSO, NOW READY, NEW EDITIONS OF 1. Outlines of Sermons on the New Testament. 2. Outlines of Sermons on the Old Testament. 3. Outlines of Sermons to Children, 4. Pulpit Prayers by Eminent Clergymen. 5. Anecdotes illustrative of New Testament Texts. Copies sent post-paid on receipt of price, hy putHishers, ®f)e Clerical Eitrarg. EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. |:cId fork; A. C. ARMSTRONG AND SON, 714 BROADWAY. 1886. AUTHORS OF SERMONS. Right Rev. William Alexander, D.D., Bishop of Derry. Right Rev. Alfred Barry, D.D., Primate of Australia. Very Rev. G. G. Bradley, D.D., Dean of Westminster. Rev. Stopford A. Brooke, M.A., London. Rev. Prof. A. B. Davidson, D.D., LL.D., Edinburgh. Ven. Archdeacon Farrar, D.D., F.R.S., Westminster. Rev. Canon W. J. Knox-Little, M.A., Manchester. Rev. Canon H. P. Liddon, D.D., St. Paul’s, London. Rev. Alexander Maclaren, D.D., Manchester. Rev. George Matheson, D.D., Mellar. Rev. Joseph Parker, D.D., London. Very Rev. J. J. S. Perowne, D.D., Dean of Peterborough. Rev. Charles Stanford, D.D., London. Right Rev. William Stubbs, D.D., Lord Bishop of Chester. Very Rev. C. J. Vaughan, D.D., Dean of Llandaff. 262 . Ex 76 PREFATORY NOTE. The following expositions are all gathered from fugitive or unpublished sources. 601471 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/expositorysermonOOalex I. Enoch. Gen. v. 21-24. And Enoch lived sixty and five years ^ and begat Methuselah: and Enoch walked zvith God after he begat Methuselah three hundi^ed years ^ and begat sons and daughters : a7id all the days of Enoch were three htmdred. sixty and five years: a7id Enoch walked zvith God: a7td he was 7wt ; for God took himl^ Enoch is one of this world’s representative men. It is written of him by the writer of Genesis, that he was not found amongst the dead ; it is written of him by the writer to the Hebrews, that he was “ translated that he should not see death.” Such a contingency could never have be- fallen any man who was not essentially a representative of his race, could never have been attributed to any man who had not impressed his race with a sense of his representa- tive character. In the world of literature, in the world of philosophy, in the world of morals, there are men who, spiritually speaking, may be said to have been translated that they should not see death, but these have all, without exception, been representative men. Time has not touched their fame, their eye is not dim nor their natural strength abated, but that is because their lives were universal lives. They were not men of a party, of a sect, of a school. They did not walk round the mere environments of their subject of study. They did not occupy themselves with the ephe- meral and accidental questions which floated in their con- temporaneous atmosphere ; they laid hold of that element in their atmosphere which was to constitute the breath of every life and to form the being of every time. By that grasp of the universal in humanity, they being dead are yet speaking. But just because the representative men of the world have refused to occupy themselves with the accidental B 2 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES questions of their own day, they have incurred the fate involved in Mr. Carlyle’s aphorism ; they have had short biographies. Let us look at this man Enoch as his figure looms down upon us through the mist of six millenniums. He stands amidst a group of antediluvians but his form is easily distinguishable from all beside. He is unques- tionably and confessedly the hero of the band, the one life amongst them whom posterity has judged worthy to in- herit everlasting youth ; but this is on the heavenly side of his being. When we look at the earthly side we are impressed with a contrast between him and his contem- poraries of a totally different kind. From the spiritual standpoint Enoch is the greatest man of the band, but from the earthly standpoint he is the least ; he has a short biography. The test of earthly greatness in that day was the duration of years, and measured by that test, Enoch sinks far beneath his contemporaries. He cannot touch the longevity of the Adams, the Seths, the Cainans, the Methuselahs ; his life embraces but a golden year of circling suns. The measurement of the man must be esti- mated on other grounds than those of duration, and his greatness must be determined by another standard than that of the world. His physical life is weaker than all the physical lives around him. The days of his earthly pilgrimage reach not to the days of those who went before nor of those who followed, yet he has an immortality that belongs not to them ; he is not found among the dead. Now in all this there is nothing accidental ; it is the law of the spiritual life in every age. The leading men of the world have from the physical side had the least eventful lives. In the earliest recorded history of the human race the thought appears with marked emphasis. The opening chapters of Genesis contain the narrative of two contem- poraneous orders of human life ; they are called in that record respectively the Sons of God and the Sons of Men, but we of modern times should best describe them as the men of matter and the men of spirit. The one race is represented by Cain, the other is prefigured in Abel, and even in their first representatives their distinctive marks appear. “ Cain ” means possession ; “ Abel ” signifies vanity ; the one typifies the fulness of worldly gain, the other represents the sense of worldly emptiness. All down ON THE OLD TESTAMENT 3 the stream of the antediluvian centuries the characteristics of these races are manifest. All the historical interest centres in the sons of Cain. They are the inventors of musical instruments, the forgers of brass and iron, the dis- coverers of a mode of architecture, the initiators of an art of poetry, the earliest builders of walled cities ; they laid hold of the civilization of this world and therefore they have deservedly the higher place in the world’s history. With the order of Abel, on the other hand, it is all the reverse. The men of this school make no figure in the world and do not seek to make any figure. We know nothing about them but their names and genealogies. Whatever eventfulness belonged to their lives must have been an eventfulness of spiritual experience ; it does not manifest itself on the surface. Their life is a hidden life ; the changes and revolutions of their being are all within, and just because they are subsisting on that which is universal to humanity there is nothing in experience which can catch the historian’s eye. I. We have implied that in the lives of these represen- tative men the absence of an outward eventfulness may be at once supplied and explained by an eventfulness of inward experience. Now, in the case of this man Enoch, it is emphatically so. Brief as is the record of his life it is long enough to give us a glimpse behind the scenes, and in the case of a representative man it is only behind the scenes that any one cares to see. The whole narration of his history is summed up in the simple words of a single sentence — “And Enoch lived sixty and five years and be- gat Methuselah ; and Enoch walked with God after he begat Methuselah three hundred years and begat sons and daughters.” Yet in that artless and primitive narrative, so simple, so compressed, so unadorned, there is revealed a volume of rich human experience. We are made to see that in the heart of this uneventful life there was indeed transacting one of the most marvellous events which the universe can ever witness — the birth of a human soul from darkness into light. It is by no accident that after the close of the first sixty-five years the words “ Enoch lived ” are changed into the words “ Enoch walked with God ; ” it is the expression of a great and solemn fact which sooner or later every spiritual man must learn. 4 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES It tells us that to this man there came that time which comes to every developed soul when the life of the vege- table is transformed into the life of the human, when the man ceases to be a mere living and breathing apparatus, and begins to manifest himself as a working force and power. For five and sixty years — the period, let us say, of an antediluvian youth — Enoch simply lived. He grew, as the plants grew, by the force of a spontaneous nature unconscious of its own native majesty. He entered into relation with the physical world, and had no glimmering of a suspicion that there was aught within him which had a right to transcend that world ; through all these years he was but of the earth earthy. But at the end of these years there came a change, and from the manner in which the dates are marked we may infer that it was a sudden change. Had it been gradual it would have been no more possible to have fixed its year than it is possible to fix the year when the natural child becomes the natural man. How it came we know not ; whether it was suggested by circumstances from without, or whether it arose incompre- hensibly from within, we have not the data to determine. When a soul is ready to take fire a very slight external cause will be sufficient to ignite it — a cause which for any incombustible spirit would be simply non-existent. Probably to the eyes of his contemporaries the change in the life of Enoch had that look of unaccountability which we call madness. It matters not ; the important question is not its cause, but its nature. It is described in the narrative of Genesis as the transition into a new world, a spiritual world, a world incapable of being perceived by the merely physical life ; for sixty- five years he had lived, for the next three hundred years he was to walk with God. He had been iii union with the region of the five senses, and he had asked for nothing more, but now there were opening within him new senses leading into other regions — an eye that was cognisant of a light which never shone on land or sea, an ear which caught the sound of a music unutterable by earthly voices, a heart which had wakened into thoughts which the human imagination had not con- ceived. He was beginning to seek for objects beyond experience, to set his affections on things above, to look towards a life which was unseen and eternal. In that hour. ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 5 though he knew it not, he had entered upon the process of vanquishing death ; the beginning of his translation was the hour of his walk with God. II. Here, then, was a mystery in the life of Enoch, a mystery which is repeated in every regenerated life. But let us look deeper into the narrative before us, and we shall find, if possible, a still greater mystery. Previous to that day on which Enoch became the subject of a great spiritual revolution he had already begun to discharge the ordinary ciuties>-of a householder ; he had become the educator of a family. When the spiritual change passes over him we expect to hear that he has abandoned these commonplace cares. We expect to hear that, after the manner of Eastern devotees, his walk with God has become a desertion of man. We look for his translation out of the world even before his death. When we are told that at a definite period of life he walks with God, or strikes out into a spiritual pathway, we fully expect the sequel to be that he walks no more with men and participates no longer in the ways of men ; that is the sequel which Brahmanism, which Buddhism, which the great mass of Eastern religions would have deemed imperative. But this man reverses all our expectations. He is not of the East Eastern ; he is no Brahman, no Buddhist, no ascetic. He goes up into the life of God, to walk in the spiritual regions, and we expect to see him vanish in the clouds of heaven, but presently he re-appears in the world of men and resumes the life of common day. He ascends up into the mountain, but it is only to come down again into the valley perfumed with the fragrance of the moun- tain air. When the great spiritual change first comes to him it finds him engaged in the duties of a householder ; when the great spiritual change is completed it leaves him resuming those duties. The three hundred years of his walk with God are years of family life ; he brings up sons and daughters. His life in its outward aspect in no respect differs from the lives of those around him. His walk with God lies not over a different road from the common walk with men ; the difference lies not in the road but in the companionship, not in the steps taken but in the spirit with which they are taken. Before he saw God he had a sphere in a human family ; after he saw God he had still the same 6 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES sphere. But it was no longer the same man that filled it, and therefore it was no longer filled in the same way. The walk with God leads through the paths of earth as well as the paths of heaven, but he who has entered upon that walk can no longer separate these paths ; the atmo- sphere of heaven penetrates everywhere. It does not unsphere the lives of men ; it purifies the old spheres. It makes better fathers, better sons. It makes the soldier a more loyal soldier, the philosopher a more true philosopher, the legislator a more just legislator ; the triumph of eternity is the sublimation of time. That is the great truth which Enoch was the first to see, the great truth which he was to make the distinctive principle of the coming Jewish nation. This man standing at the head of the stream is at once the representative and the prophecy of that which constitutes the genius of Judaism. That religion, almost alone amongst the faiths of the East, maintains from beginning to end that the sacred has its province in the secular. It is a protest against the Brahman, against the Buddhist, against the ascetic of every age. In opposition to all theories of mysticism and tran- scendentalism, it declares that the earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof. It claims for God all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them : every government is His government, every law is His law, every political institution is an ordinance from Him. There is no difference between treason and impiety ; there is no distinction between anarchy and atheism. God is not only the supreme ruler of the earth — He is the only ruler ; He is without rival and without second. Therefore it is that to the Jew, that man who had most of the Divine life was the man who had the best right to fill the largest secular spheres. Of all spheres that which he had most right to fill was the circle of family life, for the family was the begin- ning of the kingdom and the kingdom was the reign of the Theocracy. The goal of Jewish religion was morality, and the beginning of its morality was the life of home. The essence of Jewish religion was a and the first steps of the walk were around the domestic altar. The sacred fire which illuminated the saints of the Old Testament burned not on the mountain-tops ; it enshrined itself in the valleys of their lives. It lighted up the family circle, it ON THE OLD TESTAMENT, 7 warmed up the domestic duties, it irradiated the sphere of household commonplaces. It is not without significance that when we would describe in a single word the greatest leaders of that primitive age we call them by the one name of patriarch or father. III. But there is one other point of significance in this brief narrative of Enoch’s life, and a point in which, more than all others, he stands out as a representative of his nation. We have seen that in him is first revealed that great prin- ciple of Jewish faith — the identity of religion with morality. We have now to see revealed in him that other character- istic doctrine of his race — the connection between morality and immortality. That connection is expressed in one pregnant utterance: ‘‘he walked with God; and he was not.” We have nothing to do here with that in the narrative which is miraculous ; we are concerned with that which is non-miraculous, representative, universal. We wish to find what is that element in the life of Enoch which has constituted to posterity the fact of his immortality. When we read this fifth chapter of Genesis we seem to be walking through a cemetery perusing the inscriptions on the antediluvian tombstones. Each life contains a common epitaph — a record of birth, parentage, and length of years, closed by the one universal statement, “ and he died.” But here, in the midst of the cemetery, there is a vacant space where a tombstone was meant to be, and instead of the common inscription of death there are found the words, “ he was not, for God took him.” He was not ; he never became a thing of the past, it always can be written of him — he is : such was the deep significance of the primitive epitaph on Enoch. It tells us that he is not numbered amongst the things that have been, that he has not passed away with the shadows of a bygone time, that he lives in a perpetual present, in an everlasting now, in an eternity of immortal youth ; and then it completes the picture by declaring that this immortality was to him no accident, no capricious destiny, no arbitrary fate ; that he received im- munity from death just because there was in him that which could not die — “he walked with God, and he was not.” Now here is the great truth which the world in general 8 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES has grasped, and which Judaism in particular has made her own — the connection between morality and immortality. To the consciousness of mankind the freshest and greenest thing in this world is the pure heart. It is independent of all time ; it is independent of all space. When we meet it on the page of history we refer it to no age or clime ; we accept it as a fact of humanity. The heroism of moral purity is never antiquated ; it is always modern. The men who have walked through this world by the power of faith are, even in a spiritual sense, translated that they should not see death. They are not to us men of the past ; we shake hands with them across the centuries as by the bond of a present continuity. They never recede with the years ; they are as young to-day as they were a thousand years ago. The life which they lived was not the life of their time but the life of humanity. Their walk through the world was a walk with God, and the walk with God never becomes a beaten path ; it is perpetually trodden, yet to every soul that treads it it is ever new. The man who treads that path is abreast of every age ; it always can be said of him, he is ! Here, then, is the grand principle which Enoch be- queathed to the Jewish nation and to posterity — the power of morality to transcend the limits of time. He taught by his life, he illustrated by the survival of his life, that the evergreen element of humanity is conscience, that mar- vellous power which, call it by what name you will, issues the categorical imperative, “ thou shalt ; thou shalt not.*’ The one life amongst the antediluvians which does not come to us as an echo of the past, is that life which is a walk with God. Seth, and Enos, and Cainan may have been greater men as the world counts greatness, and their lives may have been more eventful to their day and generation, but for that very reason they are less eventful to humanity. The distinctive merit of Enoch w^eighed against his con- temporaries is the fact that his life laid hold of that which belonged not to his age, nor to any age, but which consti- tuted the basis of human nature itself ; by this, he being dead yet speaketh. He bequeathed to his countrymen a revelation of the truth that morality is man’s hope of immortality. Judaism appropriated that lesson, and in theory never swerved from it. Of a future state in itself ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 9 she speaks little, and of the nature of the future existence she does not tell. But the one point which this religion grasps is the message borne down to her by the life of Enoch, that the way to escape death is the walk with God. “Who shall abide in His tabernacle, who shall dwell in His holy hill ? He that hath clean hands and a pure heart, who hath not lifted up his soul unto vanity nor sworn deceitfully ; he that doeth thus shall never be moved.” The one eternal object in this world to the heart of the Jew was the life of God ; the very name of Jehovah means the Eternal. The one hope of human immortality to the heart of the Jew lay in union with this life of God ; to walk outside of Him was to die, to walk with Him was to live for evermore. Where was the place of the dead he knew not nor cared to inquire ; all he knew was that even from that region the Divine Omnipresence was not ex- cluded : “ If I make my bed in Hades, Thou art there.” The problem for Judaism was to get near to God, to touch the secret of that Divine holiness in which lay the Fountain of life. To be holy as He was holy, to be pure as He was pure ; to meditate on His law day and night ; to keep His commandments one by one : that was the sum of her creed, that was the substance of her hope. Her religion was a walk with God, and the walk with God was the road to immortality. G. M. II. Noah. Heb. xi. 7. By faith Noah, being 7varned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with feai‘, prepared an ark to the saving of his house ; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith. The great servants of God, as a rule, share in a common stock of thoughts, feelings, resolves, efforts, sacrifices, which lift them, as a class, above the ordinary level of men, and make them what they are. They live in the world without being of it ; they look beyond these narrow frontiers for their ruling interests and their deepest motives. In some shape or other, they give up what they see, for what they do not see ; they feel beforehand that life is a thing at once blessed and awful ; blessed in its opportunities, awful in its possibilities. They act as men who are in possession of lO EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES the clue to its real meaning. They know and feel why they are here, and whither they are going ; and in communion with the Author and end of their existence, and in doing His will, so far as they know it, by themselves and among their fellow-creatures, they realize the true scope and dignity of their being, and they fertilize the lives of all around them. “ Blessed is the man that hath not walked in the counsel of the ungodly, nor stood in the way of sinners, and hath not sat in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the Lord, and in His law will he exercise himself day and night. And he shall be like a tree planted by the waterside, that will bring forth his fruit in due season. His leaf also shall not wither, and look, whatsoever he doeth, it shall prosper.’’ But over and above that which is common to them as a body, each am.ong the servants of God has some distinguishing characteristic. As in nature, no two flowers, no two animals, no two human countenances, are exactly alike ; so in grace, this reflection of God’s exhaustless resources is even more apparent, and each who has a part, still more each who is eminent in the kingdom of grace, has in it a distinct place, and form, and working, which belongs to no other. His character, or circumstances, confer upon him a speciality, which makes him, at least in some respects, unlike any who have preceded him, unlike, we may dare to add, any who will follow him. The great patriarchal figures who move before us in the earliest pages of the Bible are, as a class, naturally clouded in the dimness of a remote antiquity. Of the seven names which are contemporary with Noah, one only attracts a specific moral and religious influence. We pause at the holy life, at the glorious translation of Enoch. With this exception, there is little to arrest the attention beyond the length of years which was granted to these earliest gene- rations of men. Strange, almost inconceivable, as such longevity may appear, when we contrast it with the exist- ing limits of human life, it is in harmony, nevertheless, with the general scale of gigantic power, which, according to the most reliable evidence relating to the old world, was characteristic of it. Life in that earliest age was com- paratively simple, regular, and free from the social mischief and wickedness which came along with a more organised ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 11 society. The climate, the weather, and the natural con- ditions under which mankind moved, were probably very different from those which succeeded, and Paradise itself was still recent So that although in the exercise of his great prerogative, man had forfeited the endowments with which he had been originally blessed, yet some of these, such as immortality, would abate but gradually, and thus it was that Enoch was translated into eternal life with God, without passing through disease and death. Five genera- tions of ancestors, at least, must still have been living — Jared, Mahalaleel, Cainan, Enos, and even Seth ; while Enoch's son, Methuselah, and his grandson, Lamech, had attained an age far beyond that of modern men. Of all the antediluvian life, from the time of the creation, only Adamhad been taken to his rest, only Noah was not yet born. Sixty-five years elapsed between the translation of Enoch and the birth of Noah, and during that interval the moral atmosphere of human history had very rapidly darkened. This result appears to be due to two main causes, beyond and above the constantly self-aggravating effects of the Fall. In the fourth and fifth chapters of Genesis, the development of the human race is traced through two entirely different lines — that of Cain and that of Seth. It would seem that notwithstanding the general sense of the phrase elsewhere in Scripture, the Sethites, and not any beings of a higher world, are on this occasion meant by the august title, “Sons of God;" and an inter-marriage between the Sethites, who had preserved the higher and better forms of religion, and the Cainites, who had entirely lost them, issued in the rapid moral degradation of the posterity of Seth. Distinct from this, but contemporaneous with it, was the appearance of the giants ; they were tyrants, it would seem, physical natural monsters — men who made the law of might to be the governing force in that primitive society. The corruption of the old world was therefore traceable to two causes, each in its way fatal to the moral well-being of man. It was traceable on the one hand to social oppres- sion and cruelty ; on the other hand to a reckless sensuality. Lamech felt the evils of his time ; it all seemed to him to flow, as it did flow, from the sin which had been brought 12 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES about, and from the curse which had been pronounced in Eden. He felt the burden of his labour upon the ungrate- ful soil ; and when his son was born, we read of the father’s melancholy, together with a profound presentiment of some brighter future, in the name of the infant, “ and he called his name Noah, saying. This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the Lord hath cursed.” Noah’s general and lofty piety is described by the same phrase as Enoch’s — He walked with God.” This expression denotes more than that which was used in a Divine manner of Abraham. Abraham was to walk, and did walk before God. Still more carefully should it be distinguished from walking after God, the phrase by which Moses enjoins obedience to the commands given in the Divine law. To walk before God is to be ever conscious of His over-shadowing and searching presence ; but to walk with God, is something higher and more blessed even than this ; it is to be, as it were, constantly at His side, and admitted to His con- fidence ; it is to be admitted to a close and intimate communion with Him as a dear personal friend. It is to be in spirit what the apostles were in flesh, when they shared day by day in the streets and lanes of Galilee, the Divine companionship of the Incarnate Son. It is St. John’s ‘‘fellowship with the Father and His Son Jesus Christ.” It is St. Paul’s “ being quickened and made to sit together in heavenly places with Jesus Christ.” Once only besides does the phrase occur in the Old Testament, where the Prophet Malachi applies it, not to the Israelites generally, but specifically and distinctly to the conduct of the priests, considering that they stood in a closer relation to God than the rest of the ancient people, and could enter the Holy of Holies, and have intercourse with the Sacred Presence which was there veiled from the public eye. Noah’s piety, then, was of an exceptionably lofty kind ; he is said to have been a religious man, and perfect in his generation, and in the midst of the general corruption he found favour in the eyes of the Lord. Of this temper his thankfulness after his deliverance is a sample ; in order to express it he sacrifices some of the little store which he had saved from the general wreck, and a sentence in the ON THE OLD TESTAMENT 13 Prophet Ezekiel implies that he had special power as an intercessor with God. Yet his intercession is classed with that of Job and Daniel, and his thankfulness was both in form and the spirit of its manifestation, an anticipation of what is shown in other instances, as that of Moses ; and Holy Scripture, with its wonted simplicity and truthfulness, describing his falling in his old age into an error, does not place him in this respect above the level of other servants of God. We have, then, still to ask, what it was wherein Noah’s excellence more particularly shows itself. And this question is answered in the passage we are considering, in the Epistle to the Hebrews, which, omitting all else — and there is rnuch which the history of this great patriarch suggests — bids us observe, that “By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house ; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteous- ness which is by faith.” Indeed, it is to this period in the life of Noah that all the allusions to him in the New Testament, with the one exception of that of our Lord in St. Luke’s Gospel, con- sistently refer. In the mind not only of St. Peter, but of our Lord himself, the “ days of Noah ” were specially that most critical period of one hundred and twenty-five years which preceded the deluge. It is possible that the social or political interests of his life may have been greater at an earlier or at later periods, it is certain that the intensity of its moral interest centred in this. In Noah’s building the ark at the command of God, there are three main points to be considered. It implies, first of all, that he had an earnest conviction of the sanctity and greatness of moral truth — a conviction which, more than any other, is the basis of religious character. He was surrounded by a populace which had broken altogether away from the laws of God. Impiety, impurity, and licentiousness, were the order of the day. Every imagina- tion of the thoughts of man’s heart was only evil con- tinually ; the corruption was universal and profound. To numbers of men, this surrounding atmosphere of evil would be simply destructive to the moral sight. Those of us who know anything of our own hearts and characters must know this how easily we get accustomed to the sight 14 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES of what is wrong — how soon we feel complacency, or something like complacency, towards it — how it under- mines our sense of its own malignity, and makes us, if not exactly its captives, yet its tolerant apologists. “ Neither did they abhor anything that is evil,’' is a severe and exceptional condemnation by the psalmist. It is not that evil triumphant, as in Babylon, crushes out the remaining righteousness in the land ; there it is, and we take it for granted in ourselves and others ; it is part of the actual sum of human life and activity — nay, it is a very large part; in our hearts, too, it finds something like countenance and sympathy. What is the good, we say to ourselves, of finding fault with the weather, or with an epidemic ? We may wish that things were otherwise ; we cannot but resign ourselves to take them as they are, and this acquiescence in evil, as inevitable, involves a something beyond ; it leads us to shut our eyes to what the deepest and truest of all human presentiment, apart from the revelation of God, points to as its certain consequences. It blinds us to the fact that it must be followed, at some time or other, by punishment. Could it be otherwise, God would not be God, a necessarily and intrinsically Moral Being. Could it be otherwise, the first and most earnest forms of belief in conscience would be untrustworthy. And yet we may by familiarity with this indolent sympathy with evil, learn first to forget that evil leads to punishment, and next, and not improbably, even to deny it. It is inconceivable, we say, that a world-embracing mass of evil should be punished : its very universality is its safe-guard and its protection ; it might be punished if it were an exception, it must escape simply because it is the rule. This is what we secretly say to ourselves. We shut our eyes to a first truth of morals, and we flatter ourselves that we naturally escape the effects. It was against this tacit and fatal influence of a corrupt moral atmosphere that Noah’s life was a protest of resist- ance. He was,” the Bible says, “ perfect in ” or among ‘‘ his generations,” and these generations were corrupt. He was a preacher of righteousness when righteousness was at a discount and peculiarly unpopular. He walked with God when mankind at large had forgotten Him. He did not think the better of evil, of its real nature or of its ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 15 future prospects, merely because it was practised on a large scale and with considerable apparent impunity. To Noah, the eternal truths were more certain than the surface appearances of life ; he was certain that evil was evil, and that it could not but be followed by chastisement, because God was God. Such a moral conviction it must have been which fitted Noah to receive the Divine prediction of a coming deluge. God does not take the morally deaf and blind into His confidence. The words of Jesus Christ sound through all the ages of human history as the voice of a Divine and presiding Providence : ‘‘ He that hath ears to hear, let him hear,*' he whose moral senses are really alive, let him listen to the proclamations of God’s truth. To those only it will be made known. He that willeth to do the will of God, shall know of the doctrine whether it be of God.” . . . Noah was warned of God of things not seen as yet ; he was the subject in some way — it were folly to attempt to deter- mine in what way — of supernatural communications ; it may have been some sensible voice from without, it may have been an unmistakably Divine operation, when God said unto Noah, ‘‘The end of all flesh is come before Me ; for the earth is filled with violence through them ; behold I will destroy them with the earth. Make thee an ark of gopher wood. . . . Behold I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die. But with thee will I establish My cove- nant.” Why should Noah believe this prediction sufficiently to act upon that command? Because God had spoken; that was his reason, that was his conviction, — it was enough for him, he needed no more. But then his conviction of the un- changeableness of that truth, and of the moral laws of God, would have rendered such an announcement, under the cir- cumstances, to him at least morally intelligible. It was true that what was foretold, was to come unprovided by any past experience. In the burning plains of central Asia, the idea of an universal deluge may well have seemed the wildest of imaginations. A thousand years, at least, had already passed, and there had been nothing like it. Nature seemed to be unvarying in her movements, the sun rose and set, the seasons succeeded each other, the generations i6 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES of living beings appeared and passed away ; there was a limit, so to call it, a regular period traversing this in a discernible and provided order, but as yet there was nothing that met the sense to warrant the expectation of a vast or overwhelming shock or catastrophe. Why should it be otherwise hereafter ? why should this accumulated experience go for nothing ? why should this sense of security, so amply warranted, be succeeded by appre- hensions and distrust, for which, as yet, the annals of the world afforded no parallel ? The answer was, that God had spoken. Who that believes in a real living God can plead observation in the divinity of nature against the avowed will of the Author of nature? After all, this in- variability, so to call it, appeals rather to the imagination than to the reason ; the imagination becomes so accustomed to it, so moulded by it, that it undergoes a certain distress at the very thought of its violent interruption ; but reason, true reason, is ever mindful of the limits which must’ bound even our widest observations. Because we observe a con- tinuous sequence of similar effects, it does not follow as an absolute certainty ; it at most amounts to a very strong presumption, strong in proportion to the range of our observation, that these effects will continue. We are not really in possession of knowledge respecting any great necessity rooted in the nature of things, which makes it certain they must continue ; and if we believe that the Almighty Author of nature is really alive, and that He is a Moral Being — and not merely an intelligence, still less merely a force — and that as a moral being He may have grave reasons for disturbing altogether this physical and social sympathy which encircles us, we shall not then dis- trust Him if He tells us that He means to do so. And so it was that Noah was moved, as the apostle says, with fear, with a fear most reasonable, as it was judicious ; he did not treat the warning he had received as if it had been only some evil omen, appealing at best to his superstition, but he prepared an ark to the saving of his house. This event, in which Noah believed before it came, was appealed to in a later age by St. Peter, as furnishing a reason for believing in a still, to us, future and greater catastrophe. St. Peter is writing at the very close of his life, and already a sufficient time had elapsed since the ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 17 Ascension of our Lord to allow for the foundation of systematic doubts respecting His second coming to judg- ment ; doubts which were based upon the apparent endur- ability of the world and of the laws of life. Where is the promise of God’s coming? men asked in that generation, too ; all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. The apostle reminds those who argue thus, that Time has no meaning for the eternal God, and that to apply pur notions of the difference between greater and lesser portions of it to His Majestic providences, is to for- get that there is simply no such thing as succession in His unbegun, unending life. ‘‘ Beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing— that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.” But if Christ’s delay meant nothing but His long-suffer- ing, the unchanging order of the world could not be urged as a reason for this unbelief in the catastrophe of a future judgment, because the past history of the world contained at least one eminent example of such a catastrophe. “ By the word of the Lord the heavens were opened, the earth standing out of the water and in the water, whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished.” In other words, water had been the instrument by which the surface of the earth was moulded ; water had been one of the constituent elements of its well-being and productive- ness, yet at the creative word of God, from being a servant and blessing, it became an over-mastering force and scourge ; and what had been, might yet, would yet, be. Another element had yet a work to do in God’s Provi- dence, and neither the lapse of years nor yet the observed regularity of nature were any real reasons for presuming that a final catastrophe would not come at last. “ The heavens and the earth, which are now,” says the apostle, “ by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the judgment and perdition of ungodly men.” Nay, it is very possible that with a higher knowledge than that which we at present possess, we might be able to extend the argument by additional illustrations. Some years ago it was usual to refer wholly to the time of the Deluge the more ancient animal remains which had been discovered in caverns or beneath the surface of the earth, but more recent science urges that these remains c i8 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES simply imply, at least generally, a higher antiquity, and are found under circumstances for which no universal flood would sufficiently account. It may be so. But is there anything in the text of the Bible which obliges us to narrow down to 6,000 years, or in any way whatever distinguish the measure of the earths antiquity, short of admitting its absolute eternity? On the contrary, between the original creative Act and the description of that gradual process, by which through successive periods {days they are called in the eastern idiom) this world was brought into its present state, there is room for a measure- less interval, I should rather say for a series of intervals ; and if this be so, who shall say that many of the animal, it may be some of the apparently human, remains, which are now pointed at as hostile to, or at least as damaging to, the faith of Christians, are after all only relics and re- cords of bygone catastrophes of which, previous to the creation and present order of things, this globe has been the scene, and by which the ages of probation ac- credited to moral beings who have pieceded us here, were by the judgment of the great Moral Ruler violently closed. It is true that we are here altogether in a region of hypothesis, but I submit that there is at least nothing in Revelation which necessarily contradicts it ; while if it be true, it yields support to the argument of the apostle, it justifies the generous faith of the patriarch. Not that Noah’s faith had anything to do with such speculations ; religious men may be glad to harmonize their convictions with the advancing and often inconsistent conclusions of human knowledge, but the foundation of their faith is one and invariable ; they believe that He who made the world can control it, and when His purpose is clear to them, they do not allow themselves to lose sight of it simply because their imaginations are powerfully impressed by the spec- tacle of a settled and common order of continuance or execution. They are, therefore, in their deepest sympa- thies independent of scientific arguments, without being at all indifferent to them ; they walk by faith and not by sight ; they are certain that whatever difficulties may be urged against God’s declared will at the moment, God will, in the long run, justify Himself to men, and will vindicate ON THE OLD TESTAMENT 19 the wisdom of those who in days of trial or darkness have taken Him at His word. A third point to be observed in Noah is his persever- ance under difficulties. His faith was a practical principle, and it upheld him in the face of serious discouragements. He might have easily persuaded himself that there could be no real necessity for his personally exerting himself ; that the threatened disorder would scarcely touch one who was already 480 years of age ; that it would be enough to warn his children of what was coming, when he himself would probably have been laid in his rest. Why should he arouse himself in such advanced life to so great an effort as that required of him, instead of leaving it to be undertaken by younger hands ? The answer in his con- science was, that it had been said to him, ‘‘ Build thee an ark of gopher wood.’' Again, he might naturally have dwelt upon the great mechanical and constructive difficulties of such an under- taking. It is not to be supposed that these were left to be found out for the first time by modern criticism. How could such an ark be built so as to secure at once sufficient space and safety? How could it be provisioned, lighted, and worked ? How could the several representatives of the animal races be so gathered as to enter it ? How would it be possible to preserve them under conditions of weather and temperature so unlike their own ? And when the scourge had passed, how would it be possible to enter again upon the earth as solitary colonists, amid traces of so gigantic a desolation ? Well may Noah’s heart have sunk within him when God said to him, “ Build thee an ark of gopher wood,” yet he only lived to obey. More- over, Noah had to begin his work and to continue it, not merely without active support and sympathy, but under the eye of public opinion which was not so much hostile as contemptuously cynical. What was this extraordinary outlay of labour and skill for ? what was its purpose and meaning ? How was it other than the crotchet of a mere visionary fanatic ? Did he really think that his fancies would become true, and that the settled order of nature, as well as the civilization and progress of human life, were going to be buried be- neath the flood which he dreamt of? Was every one else 20 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES wrong, while he was right ? Was his private opinion to be weighed against the collective experience and judgment of mankind ? How they must have mocked at the entire undertaking, how they must in their aversion to the awful idea have revenged themselves upon its form and details ! What airy criticism must have been lavished upon it, and on each detail supplied to it, and on its complete structure what bitter comments must have been passed. Its useless- ness, its ugliness, its utter opposition to the whole current of contemporary thought and feeling. How, too, to some of the more liberal critics would it have occurred to en- deavour, as if in scornful and condescending pity, to enter, although only remotely and for a moment, into the strange hallucination that could have produced it, as if surveying from afar some mental curiosity, which only did not move anger because it ministered so largely to amusement. And then with what satisfaction, complacence, and confi- dence would they have betaken themselves anew to the life against which this ark was a protest and a warning, as to that which was warranted by the common sense and judgment of the time, and by a force of custom and of sentiment, which, as the world grew older, was daily gain- ing new strength. Our Lord Himself has said that what took place then is an anticipation of what will be on the eve of the last judgment. “As it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.'' Yet there was delay, a delay of 120 years, but the threatened judgment came at last, “ the flood came, and destroyed them all." Whether it was a strictly universal or something less than a literally uni- versal deluge ; whether it covered Ararat without covering, for instance, the Himalayas ; whether it can be possibly explained by any combination of known causes or only by simply natural ones — these are most important questions, but they do not touch the broad limits of the general fact, still less the moral interests of the narrative ; they would only lead us away from it. What is important is, that the judgment came — it came to vindicate the morality and sovereignty of God ; it came to justify Noah, and to con- ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 21 tend with the generations which rejected him ; it came to demonstrate the folly and wickedness of the ancient civi- lization, the uncertainty of that nature which seemed at the time so well founded and so strong. There must have been upon that day a murmur — an outburst of surprise and alarm — a struggle — an agony — a despair — when this was realized. Poets and painters have endeavoured to portray it, but as the mind dwells on any guch vast pic- ture of human agony, the heart grows sick and the head giddy. In that very multitude, no doubt, there were de- grees of responsibility and guilt, knowm to and weighed by the Eternal Justice. The apostle hints as, much in the significant expression which apparently implies, that on the descent of our Lord’s human soul into the place of the departed, there was a preaching, at least, to some of the repentant spirits of the antediluvian world. But the general result is a contrast between an overwhelming judgment and a signal mercy— a judgment provoked by forgetfulness of the given law and knowledge of God — a mercy awarded to faith in His word — a faith which was not sacrificed to false and narrow views of duty, or to base misgivings, or to the current and corrupting opinions of the time. What Noah's work really and mainly fore- shadowed would have been obscured in /its day, but we Christians look back upon it from a vantage ground, which enables us to do it justice. We see that in the labour and temporal salvation of Noah, there is already the shadow of a greater toil and a more complete deliverance. Looking to our Lord Jesus Christ, may we not, in its wretchedne.ss and yet in its hope, use in a true sense the word of Lamech, This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands." Like Noah, Jesus Christ was a preacher of righteousness — the preacher of a higher and brighter righteousness than man knew before. And as Noah built an ark for the saving of his house, so did our Lord build His Church to be the home of His fol- lowers, with the promise that against it the gates of hell should not prevail. His teaching, His example. His works of mercy. His bitter death. His resurrection from the tomb, and His glorious ascension into heaven, all are steps in this mighty work. The Divine Architect shed His very life-blood in 22 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES the labour of construction, and at length Pentecost came, and the eternal Spirit welded all into a consistent and enduring whole ; and as the races and sexes and degrees of men passed within it, one after another, at the heavenly call, lo ! there was to the eyes of faith neither Jew nor Greek, neither male nor female, circumcision nor uncir- cumcision, barbarian nor Scythian, bond nor free, but Christ was all and in all. And although since those earlier days, the passions and the errors of men have raised walls and partitions over and above the divinely-ordained stories within the Divine fabric, yet this most assuredly will not always last ; they are but human, while the ark itself is Divine. Even now, too, it floats upon the waters, upon the vast ocean of human opinion and society, and we, without any merit of our own, but by His free grace and mercy, have been permitted to enter it. Over us, too, once was uttered the prayer that the everlasting God, who by His great mercy did save Noah and his family in the ark from perishing by water, would look upon and sanctify us, that, being delivered from His wrath, we might be received into the ark of Christ’s Church, and, being steadfast in faith, joyful through hope, and rooted in charity, might so pass through the waves of this troublesome world, that in the end we might come to the land of everlasting life. It would be useful to insist, before we end, upon one or two practical conclusions which are suggested by the life and work of Noah. It suggests, first of all, a particular form of duty which at certain times of the world’s history may press very heavily on the consciences of public men, whether in Church or State, and at certain terms in life upon all of us, however retired and private our place and work may be — I mean, the duty which may arise on our seeing, or believing that we see, more or less clearly into the future, which has to be provided for or provided against. Indeed, to endeavour to look forward, or to provide in this way, is a part of the work of those who are charged with the maintenance and support of large public interests ; it is their business to observe the direction in which things are moving, the forces which are coming to the front, the combination or separation of force which may fairly be anticipated, the general result that will apparently emerge from and succeed the state of things ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 23 with which they are actually conversant Here, as else- where, to seek knowledge is more or less to learn ; and God teaches us through our natural powers of observation and reflection, as well as in other and higher ways. The prayer to know enough to be able to do His will, in our day and generation is answered. And it may be we have to deliberately anticipate very much, to which we would be willingly blind. Such a habit of looking forward, if its motive is something higher than mere speculative curiosity, will not interfere with the duties of the present hour, nor will it militate against that general temper of trustful resignation, which those who see furthest and deepest feel, and which is ever ready to leave its hopes and fears in the hands of God. In private and worldly concerns, such foresightedness is not often undervalued. No man, for instance, continues to invest his money in an undertaking, recommended though it be by an imposing prospectus and an influential Board of Directors, if beneath its fair promises and ap- parent prosperity, he can clearly see at work the causes of a coming bankruptcy. But where the interests of others are only or chiefly concerned, it may be probable that the man himself will have passed away before his anticipations are realized ; it is possible for him to find himself in Noah’s moral position, to this extent, that he foresees a catastrophe which is hidden from the eyes of his con- temporaries, and which imposes on him the plain duty of preparing to meet it. And then comes the trial ; will he bestir himself to obey the behest of his conviction, or will he indolently fold his hands and let things take their course.^ Will he say to himself, ‘‘After all, this is no particular concern of mine, it is the concern of everybody ; why should I in particular be compelled to put myself out of my way in a matter which interests hundreds of other people quite as much as it interests me? Why should I be taxed, — heavily taxed, — on the score of my far-sighted- ness, while others can go on easily and quietly, with a perfectly good conscience, only because they are too un- observant to see, or to try to see, beyond the next turn in the road of life } I will let things take their course ; there is no necessity on my part for an interference which will be mocked at till it is justified, and then, even when It is 24 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES justified, will soon enough be forgotten.’’ Will he reason thus, or will he reflect that knowledge, insight, far-sighted- ness, if they really exist, and are known to exist, constitute responsibility ; that he who as a man sees further and knows more than others, cannot merely be as others before his fellow-men or before God ; that together with know- ledge, at least of this kind, there comes, to a certain extent, the forfeiture of that particular species of liberty which is the moral bound of ignorance } Will he reason thus, and act upon his reason ? My brethren, this is a most critical question — possibly for the generation, for the country, for the Church to which he belongs, but certainly, under any circumstances, for himself. Can any one who has a heart at all, think without true sorrow of that king of France whose reign covers the greater part of the last century, who spans the interval which connects the great monarch with the Bourbon who died upon the scaffold. Few things in history are more piteous than the contrast of the youth of much interest and promise, and the advanced life of abject dissipation. Yet Louis XV. was not wanting in penetra- tion. Even the gay revelries of Versailles did not wholly blind him to sights and sounds which might have con- vinced a less observant ruler, that the foundations of the great depth of national life were surely breaking up, and that a new order of things was imminent. Allowing for the difficulties of a traditional position such as his, may we not believe that an earnest and well-considered effort to improve the condition, and to assert the rights of the lower classes of the French people in the middle of the century, might have saved France from the torrents of blood in which the inevitable revolution was baptized. Yet Louis the Fifteenth passed away his time morally and physically in pleasures, which ministered only to the satisfaction of the hour, while the mutterings of the approaching storm were falling thick upon his dying ear, and his last and deepest conviction found expression in words, which were too surely to be fulfilled : ‘‘After us, the deluge.” H. P. L. ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 25 III. Ab rah am. Gen. xxv. 7, 8. these are the days of the years of Abraham's life which he lived, a7i hundred three- score and fifteen years. Then Abraham gave up the ghost, and died in a good old age, an old man, and full of years ; and was gathered to his people, The epitaph which the writer of Genesis inscribes upon the tomb of Abraham is this : An old man and full — we translate “full of years/' but the addition weakens the sense of the inscription ; the idea is not that of duration, but of ripeness. The truth is, that when we read this epitaph, we are made powerfully conscious of the fact that there has come into the world a new standard for the measurement of human life. Formerly the only standard had been that of extent or duration. Yet, measured by such a test, the life of Abraham was not long, and did not nearly reach to the days of his forefathers ; one hundred and seventy-five years comprised the whole term of his earthly history. Nevertheless, the writer of Genesis has no diffidence in inscribing upon his grave the words, an old man, and he hastens to add the reason why he has no diffidence ; he declares that Abraham's life was long because it was full. He was an old man, not because his life was extensive, but because it was intensive ; not because it had many years, but because, within its comparatively few years, there were compressed large experiences. And this itself shows that in the view of that age there was already rising a new standard of the value of human existence. Enoch, as we have seen, had a short biography, but in his case the brevity of the earthly life is compensated by an exemption from the common law of mortality. In Abraham's case there is no such exemption, but we feel instinctively that it is not needed. We feel that no compensation is required for the brevity of his earthly years, for although few, they are already full. The shortness of the outward duration is compensated now and here by the intensity of every moment's experience. We see that the man is receiving a double portion of life in every instant of time. There are moments which seem to concentrate the value of years ; one year of grief has silvered the hair and bowed the manly form. There are lives which come to maturity long before they have reached that conventional term of years which men call the coming of age. It is with such lives as 26 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES with some American prairies, which at nightfall are colour- less wastes and at morning are filled with beautiful wild flowers ; they have sprung up in the hours of a single night. Even so there are seasons, and generally night seasons, in which the process of human growth is mar- vellously accelerated and the flowers burst prematurely into bloom. Such lives cannot be measured by duration, yet they do not really come short in quantity ; there is less diffusion but there is more intense concentration ; their years are not long, but they are full. Wherein then consists the fulness of this life of Abraham } Manifestly in the fact that his is a complete life, embrac- ing all the stages of human development. There are three great stages in the development of man. The first scene of existence is one of boundlessness, one in which the soul has sight of a great and glorious promise. The second stage is one of limitation : a cloud falls over the dream, and the glory of the promise seems to fade. Lastly, there comes a time when the second stage is reconciled with the first : the clouds which have gathered over the path of life are seen not to be really barriers to the fulfilment of the promise, but to be working out, under the semblance of adversity, the purpose and plan of our opening years. Such is the natural and normal rhythm of human life — that is to say, of human life in its complete manifestation. It is not always that an individual existence is thus per- fectly rounded ; when it is, it is an exhibition of the fulness of being. Now such an exhibition of fulness is given in the earthly history of Abraham. Here the three stages are marked prominently and emphatically. We see, first, the youth in the boundlessness of hope looking out upon the prospect of his destiny, and beholding a promise of a king- dom. We see next a cloud falling over the promise of youth, and the prospect of the destiny threatened by the imminence of a great sacrifice. We see, lastly, the recon- ciliation between the cloud and the sunshine ; the sacrifice is recognised as itself the fulfilment of the promise, and the element which seemed to be adverse is found to have been working out the prophetic ideal. Let us glance at each of these. I. The first stage of Abraham s life is one of promise. He is introduced to us in an attitude of aspiration. There ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 27 rises within him that desire which in one form or other animates the breasts of most young men — the longing for greatness. And with Abraham, as with most young men, the longing is accompanied by conviction. He feels that he has a destiny before him, that he has a name to make in the world. He interprets his aspiration itself as the voice, the prophecy of God within him, and his desire becomes the measure of his certainty. He is to become the founder of a great nation whose destinies are to in- fluence the fate of the world ; he is to be the progenitor of a vast multitude of descendants whose branches are to stretch through the whole earth, and by whose culture the whole earth is to be blessed : such is the vision of Abraham. And not the least strange feature of the vision is the occa- sion of its waking ; it comes to him in the contemplation of nature. God brings him out to look at the stars and try if he can count their number, and it is in beholding the visible glory that he recognises his own glory. To a man in modern times the command to count the stars would have quite the opposite effect to that which it produced upon Abraham. There is nothing which so depresses the modern consciousness as the contemplation of the vastness of nature, nothing which so appals the soul with a sense of its own littleness. What the Psalmist said in wonder at a fact, we say in despair of a possibility : ‘‘ When I consider the heavens, the work of Thy fingers, what is man that Thou shouldst be mindful of him.^'’ But then we must remember that the difference between us and the Hebrew mind lies deeper. Our different impressions of nature pro- ceed from our different views of God. We come to nature to find God ; the Hebrew came to nature to commune with a God whom he had already found. The God of the Hebrew was in immediate contact with the soul. The human soul was the centre of His universe, and for its pleasure and profit were all things created. The mind of the ancient seer was not dismayed in looking abroad upon the world of visible beauty. He came to that vision with the knowledge that God was already in his own heart, and, therefore, he was exalted rather than depressed by it. He was inclined to say, in anticipation of the spirit of the Divine Teacher, “If God so clothe the grass of the field, shall He not much more clothe you } 28 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES So was it with Abraham. He came out to contemplate the expanse of the nightly heavens, but he had already heard within him a voice which had exalted him above the heavens. What he sought in the starry firmament was not so much a vision of the magnificence of creation as a reflex or mirror of that sense of expansiveness which he felt within himself. God had spoken to his soul, and had promised him great things ; was it not natural that in his effort to picture the promise he should have cast his eye abroad over the bespangled dome of night Nor to one already so impressed with the greatness of his own soul would the vastness and order of the spectacle be fraught with any depression ; they would rather have the contrary effect. He would be disposed to argue from the less to the greater, from the clothing of the heavenly fields to the clothing of the yet more heavenly soul. In point of fact^ Abraham did so argue. He retired from the contempla- tion of nature more confident than ever of his own splendid destiny. He felt that if there were such order in the laws of matter, there must be at least an equal order in the laws of human history. He felt that a single human soul had in it more of God than the united sum of all this visible glory. He felt anew that his own aspirations were the voice of God within him, the promises of God to his heart, and he was nerved by an impulse alike from without and from within to begin that great historic labour- which was to produce a race of heroes like to the stars of the heaven in multitude. II. The next time the curtain rises upon the life of Abra- ham the scene is entirely changed. A cloud has fallen over the promise of his youth. The Divine will has issued a command to his will. -He is told to offer up as a sacrifice his only son Isaac. The command is tantamount to an abjur- ing of all his youthful expectations. These expectations had centred in one hope — the promise that he would be the progenitor of a race whose power and influence should fill the world. To render that hope vain, one stroke alone would suffice. The whole chain depended upon a single link — the life of Isaac ; let that link be broken, and the entire fabric must fall to pieces. Abraham is commanded to break the link of the chain. He is not simply told that it must be broken, he is asked to make his own will the ON THE OLD TESTAMENT 29 instrument in breaking it. Now, it is in the obedience to this command that Abraham comes before us as a dis- tinctively religious man. The piety of his youth, beautiful as it undoubtedly was, had yet consisted mainly in a trust of the promises of God ; he is now asked to trust God Himself, to trust Him not simply without any promises, but with the seeming reversal of all His promises. The star of hope which had been guiding him from the east to the place where Jehovah dwelt fades away as he draws near to the Invisible Presence. He is called to meet God alone, without the star, to come into the holy place as the Magi of an after day came into the manger and found cold and darkness where they expected to have seen a royal palace. Such is in spirit the trial of Abraham. He had accepted God for the sake of His gifts ; he is asked to give up the gifts, and to accept God for Himself alone. HI. One other scene remains, and it is a very remark- able one, one which reconciles the days of Abraham’s youth with the seeming contrast of his maturer years. Abraham yields himself up to the sacrifice, and immediately the hope of youth comes back to him. No sooner is the sacri- ficial act completed than Isaac, the child of promise, is restored, and along with him is restored the fulness of early expectation. It may seem strange that we have put it thus ; in the popular view the sacrificial act was never completed. But the popular view is here an illusion. What was commanded was not really the sacrifice of Isaac, but the sacrifice of Abraham. It has been customary amongst theologians to regard Isaac as the type of Christ, but in truth, if there be any typology in the matter, it must be sought in the father and not in the son. Abraham him- self is here the true foreshadowing of the Son of man, and he is so just because his sacrifice is essentially an inward one, a surrender of the will. His was, in the highest sense of the word, a completed offering ; when He had willed to give up his son, the whole process was finished, nor would the consummation of the outward act have added anything to its completeness. But the point for us to observe here is that when the will had once been surrendered, the out- ward act was not required. When the man had yielded himself to the kingdom of God and His righteousness, he got back even the earthly things which he had consented 30 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES to part with. And Abraham was in this the type of more than he knew. The scene of Mount Moriah was not simply an episode which interrupted for a time the promise of his youth, though doubtless to Abraham himself it appeared to be so. To us, who can look back from the height of a modern standpoint, the scene of Mount Moriah is not an episode, but a sequel ; not an interruption of the promise, but a revelation of the mode in which the promise was to be fulfilled. The vision of Abraham’s youth had revealed to him only the fact that he was to be the source of universal blessing ; it had not told him the manner in which it was to be conveyed. The scene of Mount Moriah took up the vision of his youth, and supplied what it had left untold. Whether Abraham knew it or not, it was to him the completion of that promise which had been made to his early years, and it is in that light alone that posterity can regard it. It may be that in the mind of the patriarch there had often risen the desire to know the manner in which his dream would be fulfilled ; it may be that from his heart there had often ascended the prayer that he might be permitted to see the form of this great day of blessing. If ever that desire was gratified, if ever that prayer was answered, it must have been in that trial of his later years, when the command was laid upon his soul to sacrifice the object of his deepest love. That in the seed of Abraham all the families of the earth have been blessed is a matter of history, and it is not less a matter of history that the mode of blessing has been the sacrifice of a divinely human will. If Abraham saw that day and was glad, it must have been through an ex- perience of sacrifice felt in his own heart ; and where could he more appropriately find it than in the silence of that stern hour of mental conflict when he was called to make his choice between the hope of his human will and his trust in the will of God. G. M. IV. Abraham’s Death. Gen. xxv. 8. '‘'‘Then Abra- hu77i gave up the ghost, and died in a good old age, an old 77ian, and full of years ; and was gathered to his peopled What is the meaning of those phrases, and how may they be true about you and me ? ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 31 First, I want you to look with me at that lovely expres- sion for the tranquil and completed close of a satisfied life. “ He died,'’ says the words, ‘‘ in a good old age, an old man, and full of years.” This supplement seems a perfectly correct one — ‘Tull of years.” Now that last phrase is the one I want to fix upon. It does not seem to me to be a mere synonym for longevity ; that would be an intolerable tautology if it were said three times over : “ an old man,” “ in a good old age,” “ full of years.” There must be some other and some deeper meaning in the phrase, as I take it, than that. And if you notice, still further, that the expression is by no means a usual one, that it is only applied to one or two of the Old Testa- ment characters, and those selected ones, I think you will see, still further, that there must be some other significa- tion in it than merely to point to length of days. It is employed, for instance, in reference to the patriarch Abraham, to the patriarch Isaac, when there are almost the same words, verbatim, repeated. Then we find that the stormy and adventurous career of the great king David, with its wonderful viscissitudes and alternations, both of moral character and fortune, is represented as being closed at last with the tranquil and crowning glory : “ He died full of years, riches, and honour.” And then we read about the great high priest Jehoiada, whose life also was full of large vicissitudes, strange paral- lels, strenuous strife, vigorous effort of reformation — we read of him, that with all the storms behind him, he died at last “full of days.” And the only other instance is in reference to the char- acter of Job, the very type of the glad man who has passed through a great many of the ups and downs of fortune ; and to him there is given the great compensation at the end, and the lovely picture with which that book closes of returning prosperity, the morning sunshine breaking in upon the seclusion and the storm of the night ; the lovely picture of returning prosperity and repeated domestic joys is crowned at last with this, which is intended to be the very summit and climax of the peace that is breathed evidently over the whole concluding narrative was : “Job died, full of years.” The words then, as I take it, mean something a great 32 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES deal more than the mere dull fact that the man had com- pleted the ordinary tale and term of human existence. I think we shall get to understand them better if we make a very slight and entirely warranted change, and instead of reading ‘‘ full of years,'’ read “satisfied with life; "having exhausted its possibilities, having drunk a full draught, having had as much as he wanted, having nothing more left to wish for, having the stormy desires all quietly passed behind him, satisfied, and so willing to go. Now, there are just three things that I want to say about this first thought. I want you to notice, for the guidance of all of us, that it is possible for each to make his life of such a sort as that wherever it stops, whether it runs on to the apparent maturity of old age, or whether it has in it a very limited period, the man shall go away from life feeling that it has satisfied his desires, met his anticipations, and been all very good. Possibly, that is not the way in which a great many of us look at life ; that is not the way in which a great many of us seem to think that it is a part of Christian and religious character to look at life ; but it is the way in which the highest type of devotion and the truest goodness will always look at it. There are people, old and young, who, whenever they look back, whether it be over a long tract of years or over a shorter one, have nothing to say about it, except, “ Vanity of vanities, all is vanity ! " There are some of my audience listening to me, I have no doubt, who stand, as a man may do, with his back to the sunshine, and all in front is flooded with light ; and when he turns about, all behind is dark and dreary. Plenty of us, whose memories contradict our hopes at every point, and at every moment, and who can only expect blessed- ness and felicity in the future by giving the lie to, and forgetting the whole history of, our life. Plenty of us to whom the future lies like the Garden of Eden, and behind us there is a blasted country like what Abraham saw when he looked down from the mountain-top on the plain of Sodom, and saw slime pits, and smoke, and sulphur, and stench. Because your past has been a godless past ; because your past has been a past in which passion, inclination, whim, anything but conscience and Christ, have given ON THE OLD TESTAMENT 33 their commandment of what you ought to be, and of what you ought to do. And so you live in a fooFs paradise of expectation about the future ; and all the while the bitter words of the voluptuary, who is represented as writing the Book of Ecclesiastes, are the only words that express what is your mode of life, “ vanity of vanities, windy strife, and vexation of spirit.” Put by the side of that this calm picture of the old man going down into his grave and looking back. Ah ! what at? What at f Field for his memory he had since those long, long ago days, when he came away from his father's house an exile. How all the hot anxieties of youth, the desires and occupations, have quieted themselves down. How far away now seem the warlike days of his life when he fought the barbarian kings. How far away the pangs of heart when he journeyed to Mount Moriah with his boy, the cord, the wood, the knife ! His love has all been buried in Sarah's grave, a lonely man for many years. And yet he looks back, and as God looked over His creative work, he looks back and says : ‘‘ It was all for the best, and the great process of my life has been ordered from the begin- ning to the end by the hand that shapes beauty every- where, and has made all things blessed and sweet. I have drunk full draughts, I have had enough. I bless the Giver of the feast, and push my chair back, and get up and go away.” He died an old man, satisfied, — satisfied, — with his life. Ay ! and what a contrast that makes to another set of people. There is nothing more miserable than to see men, as their years go on, gripping harder and tighter at this poor, fleeting, mendicant world that is getting away from them ; nothing sadder than to see how, as the opportunities and the capacities and the time for the possession of it dwindle and dwindle and dwindle, the almost ferocity of the desire with which some of us seek to make it our own increases. Why, you can see on the face of many an old man and woman a hungry, eager, dissatisfied look that has not come from the mere corru- gating of the skin, nor the wrinkles of anxiety, nor the physical changes. A selfish passion of acquisitiveness looking out of the dim old eyes ; tragical and awful to see a man, as the world goes from him, grasp at its skirts as D 34 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES a beggar does at the retreating person that refuses to be- stow an alms upon him. And there are plenty of us who feel that that is our desire ; that the less we have before us of life here on earth, the more eagerly we grasp at the little that still remains, trying to get some drops out of the broken cisterns that we know can hold no water. How different this blessed acquiescence in the flitting away of the fleeting, and this contented satisfaction with the portion that has been given. But all that does not mean any diminution of interest in even the smallest trifles of the world that lies round about us ; because there is another kind of misuse of life which is very common, which looks like satisfaction, but is not satisfaction. There is a satiety, a disgust, a weariness, a saying : “ Man delights me not, nor woman either ! I am tired of it all, and there is nothing new under the sun.” This man had a whole- some enjoyment of life till the last moment of it, and a wholesome detachment from it even in the enjoyment of it. And I come to you, and I say to you it is possible for you all to wring the last drop of sweetness and blessed- ness out of all the circumstances of life, to make even its disappointments into satisfactions, and to make of the whole of it the very thing that you want, that you feel you need ; to look back upon it all, and feel that it has been blessed and good. And yet not to cleave to it, but to be willing to let it go. And I beseech you to ask yourselves, whether the course of your life is such as that. If at this moment God’s great knife was to come down and chop it in two, you would be able to say : “ Well, I have had enough, and now contentedly I go ! ” Well now, there is another thing of the same sort, and yet a little different, which I want to say a word about. I want you to look at the possibilities of your making your life what this man made his — a complete, rounded, perfect whole, because he had accomplished the great end for which life was given. Scaffoldings are for buildings, and the days and years and moments of our earthly lives are the scaffoldings. What are you building inside, brother } What kind of a building is it that is going to be there when the scaffolding is knocked away, and the walls stand there and remain } The river rolls down, bringing tons of mud and alluvial deposit ; the moments, the thoughts, the ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 35 words, the deeds, — are there any grains of gold brought down with it ? If your life and mine has done one thing, or rather two things which are one thing, for us, then, long or short, it is a complete life. If it has not, long or short, it is a wretched fragment and a miserable abortion. Man’s chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy Him for ever. Has your life helped you to do that? If it has, though you be but a child, you are full of years. If it has not, though your hair be whitened with the snows of the nineties, you are yet incomplete and immature. The great end of life is to make us like Christ and pleasing to Christ. If life has done that for us, we have got the best out of it, and the life is complete ; never mind about the number of the days. Quality, not quantity, is the thing that determines the perfectness of life ; and like as in northern lands, where there is only a week or two from the melting of the snow to the cutting of the hay, there may be in a very brief space of time, and a very short portion of a little life, there may be a work which makes life complete. Has it been done in your life ? There is a suggestion, further, in this verse of the pos- sibility for us all, not only of looking back and feeling that all has been for good, — not only of making our lives complete, be they longer or shorter, because they have contributed to the formation of a Christlike character and led us to know God, — but also the possibility of our being willing to go or willing to abide, because we are satisfied with life. Ah ! most of us grasp at the continuance of our earthly existence as a man whirled down the stream would do at any straw that has toppled from the bank. Physically, of course, there will always be the desire you will never get away from, that men will always want to live the bodily life as long as they have bodies to live it with. That is a mere physical fact ; but we may master that and come to this position, which good old Richard Baxter has put in words whose very simplicity makes them eloquent and memorable : “ Lord ! it belongs not to my care, Whether I die or live.” 36 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES “ If life be long, I will be glad, That I may long obey ; If short, yet why should I be sad 'To soar to endless day ? ” So this man here in our text was full of years, not want- ing to go, not merely tired of life, willing to abide, willing to depart, satisfied. Or, as I said, like a man sitting at a table, who has had his meal, and is quite content to sit on there, restful and cheerful, but is not unwilling to put back his chair to get up and go away, thanking the Giver for what he has received. Ah ! that is the way to die ; and how is it to be done ? Why, the secret of it lies in the commandment which Abraham received and obeyed : “ I am the Almighty God ; walk before Me, and be thou perfect.” That is to say, a life of simple communion with God ; the realizing His presence and feeling that He is near, will sweeten disappointments, will extract all the good out of life, will make us victorious over its pains and its sorrows, will turn all that comes to us into a joy and a blessing, will make it all contribute to the satisfaction of our desires, and will bring us to feel at the last that we are ready for life and ready for death ; that this world and the next are but two of the mansions of our Father s house ; and Death, the dark narrow corridor that connects the one to the other. And so we shall be ready and say : “ Whether we live, we live in the Lord, or whether we die, we die in the Lord. Living or dying we are God’s.” And so it does not matter, so much as people think, whether we die or live. And now I have a thing or two which I want to say about the last words of this text. “ He died in a good old age, an old man, and full of years ; and was gathered to his people.” Well, that too is remarkable — a symbol very seldom employed in Scripture. It is only found in the very early books of the Old Testament, and there only in reference to a very few persons. But if you will observe the language, I think you will see that there is in it a dim intimation of something beyond this present life — a life beyond. He “ was gathered ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 37 to his people” is not the same thing as to say, ‘‘he died.” That is disposed of in the earlier portion of the verse in two phrases, one of which is remarkable : “ Abraham gave up the ghost, and died.” Being “ gathered to his people ” is not the same thing as being buried. That is disposed of in words that come after : “ He was gathered to his people, and his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the cave of Machpelah.” It is neither the equivalent of death nor of burial ; it conveys, dimly and veiledly, that some- how or other though Abraham was buried that was not all. He was buried ; yes, “ he was gathered to his peo- ple.” Why, his own people were buried away in Meso- potamia, and his grave was never near them. What is the meaning of the expression ? Who were the people that he was gathered to in death ? “ The dust shall return to the earth as it was, and the spirit shall return to God that gave it.” Dimly, vaguely, veiledly, but unmistak- ably as it seems to me, here we have expressed a pre- monition and feeling after the thought of an immortal self that was not in the Abraham that his sons Isaac and Ishmael laid in the grave at Machpelah, but was some- where else, and for ever. That is the first thing, the dim hint of a future. Any- thing more.^ Yes! “He was gathered to his people.” Now remember, Abraham was a wanderer all his life. His life was shaped by that commandment : “ Get thee out from thy father s house, and from thy kindred, and from thy country.” He never dwelt with his kindred all his days. He was a pilgrim and a sojourner, a stranger in a strange land ; and though he was living in the midst of a civilization — great cities whose walls ran up to heaven — he pitched his tent ' beneath the terebinth tree at Mamre, and will have nothing to do with all that civilization ; an exotic, a waif, an outcast in the midst of Canaan all his life. Why? Because “ he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose Builder and Maker is God.” And now he has gone to it, and he is “gathered to his people ; ” the life of isolation is over. He is no longer separated from those around him, or flung amongst those that are uncongenial to him. He is gathered to his people, he dwells with his own tribe, he is at home, he is in the city. 38 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES And so, dear brethren, life for every true man must be an isolated life, a lonely life, after all its communion. He dwells upon islands with his fellows, all separate dwellings, dotted over a great archipelago, each upon his little rock, with the sea dashing between them. But a time comes when, if our hearts are set upon that great Lord whose presence is communion, we shall be brought together, and enter into the city. The future is the perfection of society; and amongst the people, Abraham found those that had gone before him ; and reunion is sweet to the wanderer. So you and I may find — That with the mom those angel faces smile Which we have loved long since, and lost awhile.” ‘‘ He was gathered to his people.” Ay ! and there is another thought here, and that is association. According to affinity and character each is “ gathered to his people ; ” — to the folk that he is like, and that are like him ; the people with whom he had sympathy ; the people whose lives were shaped after the fashion of his own. That is possible. Men will be sorted there. Gravitation will come into play undisturbed, and the pebbles will be ranged according to their weights on the great ocean-coast where the sea has cast them up ; all the big ones together, and sized off to the smaller ones, regularly and steadily laid out. Like draws to like.” Spiritual affinities, religious character, the moral char- acter, will settle where we are, and who are our companions when we get yonder. And some of us would not alto- gether like to live with people that are like ourselves, and some of us would not find it very tolerable. The men in the Dantesque circles were made more miser- able because the men around them were of the same sort as themselves, and some of them worse. And an ordered hell, with nobody for the liars but liars, and nobody for the thieves but thieves, nobody for im- pure men but the impure, and nobody for the godless but the godless, would be hell indeed ! “ He was gathered to his people,” and you and I will be gathered likewise. Judas went to his own place — the place he was fit for, the place which he had earned, ON THE OLD TESTAMENT, 39 the country to which he belonged ! So shall we, so shall we ! Let us see to it that we take Christ for our Saviour, and give our hearts to be shaped and purified by Him ; and our country will be where He is, and His people will be our people, the people with whom His love abides ; and the tribe to which we belong will be the tribe of which He is the Chieftain and the Prince. And so shall we ever be with the Lord. V. I saac. Heb. xi. 20. By faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau co7icerning things to C077iel That story of the blessing, which Jacob got by craft from his father Isaac, presents very many singular features which we cannot enter upon now. But it is a miserable story all round. What with the doting fondness of the old man, the craft of the mother, the selfish lying of Jacob, and the savagery of Esau, it is an ugly picture, every bit of it. And yet there was one little point of light in it, one redeeming thing about it that the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews here puts his finger upon with certainty. He says — “Yes! it is a wretched story! There is nobody comes out of it very clean ; but that man that spoke, he spoke, however imperfectly apprehended, the truth. He had in him the little germ of all that was good and noble in human nature, because the blessing that he gave he gave by faith! And whatever else was bad, that was good. And whatever else was of the devil — and there was a great deal of his in the story — that was of God. And so that helps to redeem the whole story, and to lift it up into another region altogether. “ By faith Isaac foolish, fond, doting, blind, blundering, weak as he was, “ by faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau concerning things to come.” I need not enter upon the question, although it is one that would afford very fruitful consideration as to how these came to lie, side by side, in the patriarch’s expe- rience, all these manifold faults and imperfections, and yet some kind of prophetic power which made his blessing a prophecy, and therefore a reality that could not be altered when once it was spoken. 40 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES That would take us too far away ; but what I would rather fix upon for our consideration is that one thought of the faith that the writer here signalizes as being predominant in the character, — at least, more than distinctly there. And the next thing that I would suggest is, that we get here the faith of this man and of all of us in its substance. Isaac’s faith, what was it } A firm reliance, rising some- times to absolute certainty, of things far beyond the ken of mortals, his faith at first sight grasped material bless- ings, but they were unseen ones, and that is the point that this writer could dwell upon first. But that does not go to the bottom of it, although a great many people seem to think, and we hear them speak as if faith was concerned only with the unseen. Not necessarily. Faith at bottom has not to do with things, but with persons ; and Isaac’s faith — like that of all those other heroes, sages, warriors, and patriarchs in this grand roll-call in the Epistle to the Hebrews — whatever it was secondarily concerned with, was primarily concerned with God. God’s word and character, what He had shown himself to be, was the object of these men’s faith. And sometimes the object of their faith was a God that threatened, as in the case of Noah. Sometimes it was a God that commanded, as when the Israelites compassed the walls of Jericho; sometimes a God that promised, as in the case of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Sometimes their faith laid hold of a past fact, sometimes upon a present fact, sometimes upon a future one ; but wherever it led them, the materials of it was their confidence in God, and they believed His word utterly. Or, to put it into other words, our faith may either go backward or forwards or upwards ; it may either be con- cerned with the deep things of Divine revelation, or with the common things that lie round about us. We take them all because we trust in God, and faith is confidence in the Divine Lord of past, present, and future. And then, as this chapter says at the beginning, '‘Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” What our faith has to grasp is God in Christ, and only through Him do we see the things that are unseen. First, we must “behold the King in His beauty,” and then and thereby we shall “ see the land that is very far off.” ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 41 And so this old story shows us that the beginning of faith is confidence in God ; and the field in which the faith that trusts Him moves and expatiates is the blessed region beyond, into which the eye cannot pass, but in which certain hope and desire may walk, blessed and calm as the angels of God. Brethren ! everything that lifts a man out of the mire of to-day helps to make him good and pure and strong. Even the poorest earthly anticipation, if only it has got about it the magic touch of being in the future and being unseen, is more noble than when it is possessed. That is why people say about this world’s good, “ The chase is better than the prey when caught,” the run is more than the hare. Everything in the future is invested with a halo that disappears when you get near it. The mountains that ring our horizon in the country of the Alps look violet and roseate in soft glow, and when you get up there, they are cold cliffs and rocks and snow ; barrenness and roughness and death. The future, even when it is made of the same stuff as the present, is more ennobling in its effect upon a man than itself will be when he gets beside it. But if, instead of living on these lower levels, we lift our eyes up to those everlasting hills, and live by the power of that unseen reality, then all life is transfigured, ennobled, purified, and the man becomes greater because he lays hold of the things un- seen, and he lays hold of them because he first lays hold of God. And then another lesson that we get very strikingly in the story of Isaac’s life is faith in its operation. How singularly the second of the great Jewish patriarchs differed from the first and the third. Not a hero like Abraham, not a’man with a strong life like Jacob, Isaac had no need of the perfecting discipline so necessary for Jacob before he could become Israel : he never attained to anything like the greatness and nobleness of his father. A decent, plain, quiet man, living all his days with his flocks and herds in the south ; no heroisms, no force of character, just a respectable, ordi- nary, quiet, pastoral chief. When the Philistines quarrelled with him about a well, he quietly went away and dug another ; when they quarrelled about that, he dug a third ; and so passed all his life in the desert. He seems to have 42 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES had few causes of excitement — no great changes in his life, was never impelled by any desire to seek them. He had no Divine revelation, as his father and his son had in their lives. There he was, quiet in the land. ‘‘ Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” And it is very beautiful, I think, to see in his life how the same principle that made the grand organ music of the enumeration of its effects in this chapter, the same principle that “ subdued kingdoms, wrought righteousness, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the violence of fire, waxed valiant in fight, turned to flight the armies of the aliens and so on, dropped down to the low level of this very prosaic, commonplace life, he found a sufficient field in making that quiet mission peaceful and pure, and wrapped about with God through his earthly days. Let us take that lesson : there is no need for great events in our lives — great services, great sacrifices, great manifestations of the Divdne favour. The life that runs smoothly maybe as full of faith as the life that stormily surges amidst the rocks and comes down the cataract. There may be as much power in the still river among the pastures of the south of England, that flows gently and quietly in its course, as there is in the torrent that dashes among the mountains. The life of a quiet domestic character, with nothing conspicuous about it, may be as truly and as blessedly under the influence of the highest Christian principle as the noblest and the greatest of those recorded here. Not the outward form but the inward motive makes the greatness of the life, and the field of faith may be the fireside and the back of the counter and the home circle. Its trophies may be as great amongst those whom there were none to praise and very few to love as amongst those whose names are written highest and in most perennial characters on the grateful remembrance of the Church of God. Isaac was as truly a son of faith as the hero Abraham, or as the far richer and more complex character of his son Jacob. And then I might point you to two things in Isaac’s life which bear upon this quesdon. There is very little recorded about him, as you will see if you will turn to the Book of Genesis ; but there are two things told about him, one concerning his history and the other concerning his friendly relations with the people amongst ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 43 whom his lot was cast. He dwelt a long time amongst the Philistines, and there, as I said, they quarrelled about the wells. He simply gave them up, and went and dug others. Well, take that lesson. One of the most marked effects of Christian faith ought to be that of making men gentle and forbearing ; not holding on by their rights tooth and nail, fighting with everybody for a penny, so that nobody shall say they got the advantage of them. The effect of true Christian faith will always be to make a man yield rather than fight, suffer wrongly rather than shriek, and call heaven to earth, and take claws and teeth in order to contend for what is his. That principle is as true to-day as it ever was, and our Lord Himself has told us, in words that it is very con- venient for us to say are to be interpreted with much limitation : He that compelleth thee to go a mile, go with him twain. If a man will take thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.'’ Faith makes men gentle, ay ! and more than that, the faith that makes men gentle tells its own story to the outsider. These same wrangling and dis- honest Philistines, that stole the wells and then turned Isaac out of their territory, because he was getting too strong for them, and they began to be afraid of him, — what did they do next ? He quietly went away, and as is always the case, he was scarcely gone when they sent for him to come back again ; and they say to him : ‘‘ Come back to us, for we know that the Lord is with thee." That is to say, if your faith is worth the snap of a finger it will tell its own story to outsiders. They will be glad to have you beside them for more or less worthy motives ; but the motives we have nothing to do with, the point is that it will be like the ‘‘ointment of the right hand that bewrayeth itself, and it cannot be hid." And bad as the world is, it is not so bad but that it knows a good man when it sees him ; and bad as it is, it is not so bad but it has a kind of respect for him when it sees him. And in the long run, whatsoever persecution and wrong-doing there may be, “ the meek-doing shall inherit the earth " in a real sense ; and the meek man will get what a good many people would sell themselves to get — the good opinion of the men around him ; just because he does not look for it, or care to try to get it, but simply lives right- 44 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES eously. For though the Philistines may steal the wells, they all the while respect the man from whom the robbery has been made. And then let us take consolation from the other thought, that this man was a man of faith, though he was a man of a great many imperfections. I said at the beginning of these remarks, that the story of the blessing was an ugly story all round, and Isaac does not come out of it very clean either. And there are other points that come out of the narrative of his life, which show that he was by no means a faultless monster ; and yet for all that he was a man of faith. Now that is not a pillow for lazy people to lay their heads upon, and say : “ There is no need for me to strive after the perfection of my faith, because it may co-exist with imperfection.” Yes ! it may. But did you ever hear that it could exist with imperfections that people knew about and did not try to mend ? Is there anything in the Bible that says that a man’s faith is consistent and upright up to a certain point, without his doing anything to remedy or prevent failure } Faith may be consistent with failure; thank God we cannot say how much failure may co-exist with faith ; but let us remember that all faith is necessarily effort, that the smallest sin that we do not fight against will be like a little grain of sand dropped into the works of a fine clock, it will spoil all the wheels and break the mainspring sooner or later, that is if you do not get it out. And so whilst there is no reason for anything but humble penitent confidence even in the consciousness of imperfections, there is no reason for any reliance upon my faith which is not accompanied with honest, continual effort to fight against my thoughts and my sins. And, thank God ! the quiet husbandman, whose life ran in one level all along, scarcely ever brightened by anything great or grand, as far as we know it, rose at last, though amidst many faults, into a flash of grand, vivid consciousness of a blessed future. And that is what you and I have to hope for, by God’s grace, if we keep near to Him, doing our common tasks in cheerful godliness ; at the end even of a very prosaic, commonplace, low-lying life, there may come a gleam, as ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 45 upon some winter day there comes a bit of red in the sky towards the west, there may come a gleam at the last that shall show us all the brightness to come, ay ! and make us feel that it is a real thing. And so, living by a quiet humble faith, we may die in the triumph and faith that grasps the things unseen, because it reaches out its hand to grasp the unseen and eternal. VI. Jacob at Bethel. Genesis xxxv. i. And God said unto Jacoby Arise^ go up to Bethel^ and dwell there : and make there an altar unto God^ that appeai'ed unto thee when thou fleddest from the face of Esau thy br other P It was somewhere about thirty years since Jacob had vowed that vow which, even when he made it, was not of a very high tone. He made his bargain very tight when he said : If God will be with me, and will keep me in this way that I go, and will give me bread to eat, and rai- ment to put on, and see that I come again to my father's house in peace, then " — after he has done all that for me — “ then shall the Lord be my God ! " Yes! I should think so! He was his God before He did all that for him. “ And this stone which I have set for a pillar shall be God’s house ; and of all which Thou shalt give me I will give the tenth unto Thee.” Well, it was not much of a vow to begin with, but if we think of the exceedingly leisurely manner in which he set about keeping it, there is even a darker hue over the patri- arch’s character, even at its highest and its best. And a very little comparison of the events,- as they may be de- duced from the narrative, will show us that God had done all which Jacob had laid down as the conditions ten years ago; that Jacob had “comeback to his place in peace,” having prospered far beyond all hope and expectation. He had gone out a fugitive and come back a rich man ; gone out lonely, come back with all his household and his wealth. And when he had thus come back, instead of going straight to Bethel to fulfil his vow, he settled himself quietly down at Shechem ; and in that lovely valley, the fairest spot in the whole land of Palestine, he buys a bit of 46 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES ground, makes himself exceedingly comfortable, and seems to have forgotten all about the vow that he had made. So that there needs this: “And God said unto Jacob, Arise, Go up to Bethel ! ” “ Do you remember } Go up to Bethel^ and dwell there ; and make an altar there/^ You might almost put these words into inverted com- mas ; the Lord is quoting the vow : “ Make there an altar unto God.'’ And then comes a very sharp twinge : “ That appeared unto thee when thou fleddest from the face of thy brother.’^ Ah ! Is not that a picture of a great many more people besides Jacob How many of us, for instance, think of our religion very much as if it was an umbrella or a cloak, a thing for stormy weather ! How we pray when we want anything ; how when God's hand is upon us, and sickness or perplexity or disaster or loss, or the rupture of family ties comes to us and opens for a moment a glimpse into the kingdoms beyond, how we can pray then and live decided then ! And how, when the storm has passed, and the burden is lifted off our shoulders, how we do just like Jacob did, settle down at Shechem, and forget all the past when we lay there with our head on the stones, and the black night above us, and a dark dim, future before us. Ready to vow at the beginning of a questionable under- taking ; very, very slow to pay at the successful end of it. Ready to say: “When I am commencing this task, the issue of which I do not know, the difficulties of which I may not be able to meet ; " ready to say then : “ If Thou wilt do so-and-so, then shall the Lord be my God.” But when He has done so-and-so, not in such a hurry to pay the vow. How many of us have more prayers for the unknown future on the ist January, than we have thanks- givings for the forgotten past on the 31st December ! It is not Jacob only that was full of vows at Bethel, and in thirty years forgetting them just because God so com- pletely remembered His part. Well, and there is another way of looking at it, for I only want to take the plain practical lessons out of this little story now. A good many resolutions that most of us made in the early days of our Christian career, how many of them can we look back upon and say we have kept, and how many of them have gone to water } Jacob was ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 47 not a young man really when he began his course at Bethel, but he may stand for us as a type of the buoyant, joyful, confident resolutions which we are so apt to make at the commencement of our career. There is nothing sadder, I think, in the history of the Christian Church, and in the history of the individual souls that make it up, than the dreadful frequency — I was almost going to say uniformity — with which the beginning of the Christian career is always so much more bright than the reality of that same career when years have passed. Is there any reason why it should be, so frequently as it is amongst all of us Christian people, the experience that the beginning of the course promises far more fairly than the middle and the end of the course realizes ? Why should the morning always be the sunniest part of the day ? Why should it always cloud over ; or, if not always, at least so often that it is little exaggeration to say always ? Why should the average Church member and professing Christ- ian, in all our communities, be obviously a man or woman whose religious growth has been stopped and stunted ? Why should it be that most of us have in our memories a Bethel at the beginning, the vows made at which are unfruitful to this day } Is it so, my brother, or is it not, with us ? Well, let us go on with the story, and see w ^hat i t^was that kept this man from going there and builHmg his^ltar and^oing as hc' said. There are two things clearly that kept him, besides the fact that in the years that passed, the impression of his early days had been forgotten, and that the very continuance of the Divine mercy had made him less conscious of it than he was at the beginning, when it was all problematical. One of the Fathers says somewhere, that “ God by assid- uity loses admiration ; and that is one reason w^hy these vows were not rendered, viz. that the gifts had been so continuous that the continuity had destroyed the impres- sion of its greatness and had deadened the sense of admiration. If there had been breaks in it, parentheses, no man would have felt it more. No man enjoys health so well as the man who has good health now and then broken up by a great many bad days. But besides that one operative cause there are plenty in 48 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES the narrative. What did Jacob do as soon as he got this commandment } That will answer the question what it was that kept him from doing it before. ‘‘ Arise ! Go to Bethel, and build an altar.” ‘‘ Then said Jacob unto his household and all that were with him, Put away the strange gods that are among you, and be clean, and change your garments.” And they gave unto Jacob all the strange gods which were in their hand, and all their earrings, and Jacob hid them under the oak which was by Shechem.” And when they had got rid of them “ they journeyed ” and came back to Bethel. Well, put that into other words, and it comes to this : The man settled himself down at Shechem. There was a great valley, and more grass for his cattle there than there was at Bethel ; Mt_w ^ a better place to pitc h. ‘‘ Business prospects were more promising” at SKechem, and of course we know that that is the first thing that any man ought to consider in all his ways. And so of course it would answer better to stop at Shechem than to go to Bethel. The plainest dictates of duty said : “ Stop at Shechem ! Never mind the vow ! ” And he stopped there ; and he was very nearly getting into the same position that his relative Lot got into, when he and Abra- ham stood on the hill-top here, and looked over all the plain of Jordan; and Abraham had said: “You choose first the bit of land you like.” And Lot saw the cities of the plain ; he saw the plains were fertile, and he knew the cities were sinful, but he answered : “ I will go down among the godless ones. There is plenty of pasture there.” And we know what it led him to ; only God’s mercy stopped him before he got to the end. And Jacob did not go to Bethel, because the pastures where he was were good. That is to say, the thing that tugs us back is this poor sinful, miserable world ; the thing that keeps us from ful- filling these resolutions is because the world is always plucking at our skirts and keeping us from rising. The thing that ties us down to the past, which we know is an unworthy past, is, in nine cases out of ten, the mere incapability of getting rid of the temptation of earthly treasures and earthly conveniences and comforts. And we must do as Jacob did — huddle them all to- ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 49 ^ether and bury them under the oak-tree, and leave them behind us, before we can go onwards to build the altar of God at Bethel. And another thing that I must just touch upon. There must have been something very wrong in J acob’s household before there could have been idols and emblems of idolatry amongst them sufficient to make it necessary to get rid of them. How came that about, that Jacob’s wives and sons and daughters were people of that sort. Such a household, so wild a set, with a wife that was an idolater, with sons that were murderers, with daughters that were light of heart and light of conduct — such a household as that did not say much for the patri- arch’s wisdom and holiness. And it was because of the domestic associations being against him, and keeping him from going to Bethel, no doubt, that he delayed so long before he went. Which being translated is just this : — Let us take care that a man’s foes shall not be they of his own household ; and that those that are dear to us shall not be hindrances in the way of a consistent and unworldly Christian pro- fession. And you fathers and mothers, do you see to it that you do not set up or permit ways of living, occupa- tions, amusements, associations, companionships, in your household, which war against your best interest, as well as against that of those who are more immediately con- cerned in it. And remember, the one way by which we can fulfil our early resolutions and keep the mid-day and the evening of our Christian life up to the level of the early hopes of the bright morning, is the old way of sacri- fice and surrender, and the offering up of everything that is a hindrance to our communion with the God of Bethel. The first step towards the building of the altar was the bundling together of all the strange gods that had tempted these people, and the digging of a hole there below the tree, and putting them all in, and covering them well over with the sods, and leaving them there for anybody that liked to find them. And then let me remind you how this sacrifice is re- warded by the rapt vision and the renewed and enlarged promise from the God of Bethel. He goes to the place : I wonder what he thought when he got there, and saw the old stone that he had stuck up there forty years E 50 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES before, and remembered how, when he had stood by it, his heart had been heavy within him until he saw that vision at the top of the ladder, and tried to recover for a moment those early thoughts with which he had set out on his journey. I wonder if he said to himself : “ What a poor ungrateful creature I have been ! I will try to make it better for the time to come, at all events.*’ “ And the Lord came unto him again, and blessed him,” and confirmed to him his mighty name of Israel, and the promise of the land. And then Jacob raised his pillar, and poured out a drink-offering ; and, with a double meaning, called the name of the place once more “ Bethel,” the house of God. That is to say : the old man’s vision may be a deeper and a more glorious edition of the young man’s dream. The one in the night, the other in the day ; the one a narrow promise, the other a wider word ; the one limited almost to an earthly blessing, the other expanding to im- mortal hopes and celestial glories. And thus the fathers that knew Him that was from the beginning may know Him with a deeper knowledge, and hope in Him with a grander hope, than the young men that start on their careers with the knowledge of the future. But remember, the surrender of the idols is the only way to see God ; and they who, for dear love’s sake of the Christ that died, come with their broken vows and lay them at His feet, shall find pardon, and shall receive a nobler vision than even that with which He blessed the beginning of their Christian course. VII. J acob's Death, Heb. xi. 21. By faith Jacoby when he 7 aas a dyings blessed both the sons of Joseph ; and worshipped^ leaning upon the top of his staffp There were surely plenty of pieces of Jacob’s life that might have served the writer’s purpose better as illus- trations of faith than these two comparatively neglected events at the close of it, and surprise has often been ex- pressed, that, with the whole field of the recorded biography of the patriarch to choose from, the writer should have chosen just these two little things, — the dying benediction and the ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 51 dying adoration. And yet perhaps we may, without being fanciful, find a reason in the very comparative insignifi- cance of the act. The smaller the thing done the more perhaps is it an evidence of the all-pervading power of faith in the man’s life. It is perhaps more to say about people — they did the little things of life by faith, than to say — they did the big ones. Anybody can come to the height of a great action, but to have my faith so close to my hand that it naturally influences the trivialities of my days, that is a demonstration of its power in me. And so I think there need be no stumbling-block in the minute- ness of the event that is chosen as the illustration from the life of Jacob. There is another remark, viz. : that there are two very distinct incidents recorded here in inverted order to that of their occurrence. The one— the benediction upon the sons of Jacob ; and the other the event that preceded that, which is recorded by the side of it in the Book of Genesis, when the patriarch, dying, sent for his son and exacted from him an oath that he would not leave his bones there in the land of Egypt, but would bury him in the land in which he had no inheritance ; and when the promise was given, fell back, as our Bible has it — in adoration ; or rather turned himself on the bed in adoration, and in quiet triumphant contemplation of the God in whom he trusted. The explanation of the diversity of expression in my text to that of the alternative in the Book of Genesis — “ wor- shipped on the top of his staff” — the explanation of that variety is very simple and natural. The Hebrew which means bed, means also staff according as you supply one or another set of vowels — you know there were no vowels in the Hebrew language — which leaves some expressions a little doubtful at times. The translator of the Book of Genesis has adopted the one reading, and the translator of the Septuagint, — which for the most part the Epistle to the Hebrews follows, — has adopted the other. But there is nothing at all incongruous, the dragging in the mention of staff, but it is natural that the bed should appear when a man is dying, and the picture is of the old patriarch turning himself upon his bed in an attitude of adoration and contemplation, and, thinking of God, and thankful that his bones should not be laid in the alien soil of Egypt, but carried to the land of his forefathers. And so I think 52 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES out of these two incidents there come two or three im- portant lessons. The first of them is — looking at this far- off glimpse into a life lived under such diverse conditions and regulations to ours, that the man’s faith works in such a different fashion to what it works with us. Looking away into this far-away, strange, and unfamiliar mode of life, we learn first of all to understand what is the real throbbing, living heart of that thing we call religion. Here is this man — the writer of this book says — exercising the special Christian virtue of faith. And look how he explains it. At the beginning of this chapter he tells us that ‘‘ faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen,” as if he was explaining it as having mainly reference to the invisible, to the future world. But notice that that is not the definition of faith, and that the writer of this letter does not give it as a definition. He gives it as the two cases of the operation of faith, not of its essence, that it enables a man to lay hold — as of a living substance — on the things wh’ch are unseen. That is the consequence and the effect of faith, it is not faith. For how was it that these old patriarchs were able to look forward through all the dim ages, and to call the things which were not as though they were, and to believe that that land was to be theirs } It was because their faith was kept — not with the things unseen and hoped for — but with Him that had promised the things ; and deep down beneath the things that they -expected, lay the confidence that they cherished in the promising God. And so I call you to notice that wheresoever the eye and hand of faith may be turned, the essence and the heart of it is the grasp of the living God. And secondly a reliance on Him and on His word. On the surface, this old chapter seems to deal with faith as the substantiating and bringing near to me all the things that are all unseen and anticipated ; beneath, it emerges as the confidence of the soul in the promise ; and beneath that, it appears as the confidence of the soul in Him that promised. Let me take a bold illustration. Suppose a man said to you, there is ;^i,ooo to your credit in a bank. Well, you might say that the ^^"1,000 was the object of your faith, but that would only be a very loose and incomplete way of putting it. Or you might say that his word was the object of your faith, and I don’t ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 53 quarrel with your way of putting it. But below the re- liance on the word, there is the reliance on the speaker of the word, and that in the last analysis, it is neither the gift promised, nor the promise of the gift, but the promiser who gives the gift, with which a man’s faith is to be con- versant. And so you will take this chapter, this grand deed-roll of heroes of the faith ; though at first sight it seems as if the word was employed in a different shade of significance from that which it usually occupies in the Old Testament, a little more looking lets us see that it is the same idea throughout ; and that the language on which your salvation and mine is suspended, is simple affiance and trust of our whole spirits in the manifested God who “ spoke unto the fathers by the prophets,” and in these last days hath spoken unto us by His Son. He Himself is the living object, the only adequate object of a man’s confidence and trust. And so from this, — if only we will rightly understand it, — there comes forth this plain thought, that however bright and blessed our inheritance beyond, that with whatsoever fair and substantial forms faith may legitimately people the else unknown and soli- tary future, howsoever bright and glorious-^yet far less bright and glorious than the realities which they shadow — may be the visions which it conjures beyond the worst darkness beyond the grave, not this^ but the word of Him who brought life and immortality to light ; and not even that word, but Him — the Speaker — in the fulness of His own infinite verity, is the object of our faith. ‘‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life,” and we obtain an inherit- ance amongst them that are sanctified through the faith that is in Christ. And so still further. I would have you look at a thought closely connected with this one thought I have been dealing with, and yet different from it, and take that unfamiliar picture of a type of devoutness and Godly living, so far removed by circumstances, and race, and character, from our modern notion of what a good man is ; take it — that type of the dying Jacob — as an illus- tration of the fact of the substantial oneness and identity of, — call it religion, or call it faith, — in all ages, and at all stages of knowledge and culture. Jacob’s faith was yours and mine. Jacob’s creed was not. The progress of God’s self-manifestation and infinitude of wisdom, and truth, and 54 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES love, and knowledge, lay all dark and unknown to him, which has been revealed to and manifested to us ; but yet, with all the variety in the language that the faith grasped, the faith that grasped it was the same. And whether it was the God revealed partially, and yet adequately, in vision and sign ; or whether it is the God revealed, not completely, and yet so far as human possibilities are con- cerned, perfectly, in Jesus Christ, the hand that it leaned upon is the same. And we look across the ages away into the dim distances where life was so different to what it is to-day, where laws of right and wrong were so much modi- fied, in regard to what they are now. We look back to the fierce militant exclusive religion of those early days, and beneath that we see the very same thing that binds men to God to-day, and will do beyond the end of time ; for the faith of earth is the faith of heaven, and although at one end of the line stands the world’s grey fathers, with their early, contracted creed ; and at the other end may stand the saints perfected in knowledge, as in purity and in love, all these are in one line, and are united to God by one and the same faith. And Jacob with his faults and sins and limitations, and you and I, on whom the ends of the earth are come, journey on the same path to the same Father. I do not need to dwell upon the possible applications of a thought like this, in regard to our own times and circum- stances, and the plea that may be built upon it for a far wider construction of the limits of God’s house and Christ’s kingdom than we are so ready to impose upon the one and the other. The measure of the temple and the walls of the New Jerusalem is the rod which comes from heaven, and our measuring rods are not adequate to that task. Only, let us remember, no false and spurious liberality under the guise of recognising an identity of faith under all varieties of manifestation. You can take the position of these Old Testament saints, and, seeing you live at a time when so much more has been taught us than they pos- sessed, the faith that laid hold of a creed like theirs to-day would not be their faith. The faith that knits a man to God is a faith that accepts whatsoever God the Lord hath revealed ; and so says, “ Speak, Lord ; for Thy servant heareth.” Then notice how this same story, or these two stories, which are smelted into one illustration and instance ON THE OLD TESTAMENT 55 here, give us also the thought of the ennobling and refining influence of this confidence in God, and occupation there- fore with the unseen future. There is no more significant lesson in the whole Bible I think than the difference between the character of this man Jacob at the beginning and at the end of his career. At first, a low, shifty, crafty, scheming Jew; with material objects and all manner of quirks and meannesses ever near him ; and at the end, all that beaten out of him, and dignity, and simplicity, and contentedness, and lofty elevation, characterizing the whole life. And how did that serene and noble figure of a green old age with fulfilled desires, and immortal hopes ; how did that emerge from the utterances we read about in the early chapters } Sorrow } Yes and no. Discipline of circumstances } Yes and no. Growth, the natural growth of character in changing years } Perhaps. But I think deeper than all this, that promise that God had given to him among His people had sunk in his mind, and that his thoughts and desires were more and more drawn outward and onward to an unseen future ; and so by degrees the earthliness and the cunning, and the vulpine nature of the man dropped away, and w^as changed to the dignity, and grandeur, and statuesque simplicity, and beauty, the outcome and influence of a life conver- sant with unseen hopes and with the God that promised them elevating the nature out of all its lowness, and sin- fulness, and selfishness, and setting it there on a pedestal. We all admit theoretically, — whether we do it practi- cally or not, — that, given two men, a man who has pur- poses, and hopes, and anticipations for himself, or for some great cause for his fellows, running on into the future, a remote future, is, pro tanto^ so far as that goes a bigger man, a better man, a wiser man, a stronger and a holier man, than the other man that is living from hand to mouth, and has no purpose beyond the end of next week, and no hopes that go stretching out away into the far distant. And we all admit that of two men, the man that lives, not only for immediate things, but for gross, palpable, material things, is a lower man than he that lives for the unseen, though far-ofif earthly unseen. That the student, the thinker, and the artist, and all men that have their delight in the region of the invi.^ible, are 56 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES nobler men by far than the contracted and animalised spirits that grovel on, — I was going to say, — like dogs hunting for truffles, grubbing along with their noses to the ground, only sniffing up the delights that may be there. Take the two men, the man that lives for to-day is a poor creature always by the side of the man that lives for to-morrow. And the man that lives for anything that he can put into his pocket, or look at, or stow away in his senses, is a poor creature compared to the man that lives for anything that is unseen, even though it be one of the things that are unseen and temporal. And so high above that elevation, and greater far than the influence upon any life of narrowness and weaknesses and trickiness, is the great hope that drives a man onward to the great unseen ideal that dwells only before that inward eye. And therefore, you and I, whose work is cast in toiling for our daily bread ; working among the transitory things of life, have, — to speak roughly, — no other means of getting the counterpoise to the brutalising influence of the present and the seen, except faith in God, that makes us denizens of another world, and citizens of another country. I believe, of course, that the unseen and future objects which Christian faith brings near a man are infinitely mightier in than all the abstractions, or all the great objects of human pursuit the realization of which lies millenniums in advance. But for the most of men, you have next to nothing else to choose between ; and the alternative lies here for most of us, — live for the gross vulgar present, or live for the majestic future, guaranteed' to us by the living Christ, and the un- seen realities that are there. And let us notice in tin’s story how the life of faith was a life of growing nobleness and beauty ; and so take the lesson to ourselves. The last thing I shall refer to, is that this same incident may set before us the power of this confidence or faith, in the end of life. I do not mean to say as some people are disposed sometimes to preach, that the only way by which a man can die calmly is to die a Christian. God hath ordained that the physical act of dying is generally a calm and easy act. So I am not going to build upon that ; but here is this man, who has been putting his heart on hopes that are still unaccomplished, hopes that have been the nourishment and sustenance of his soul for many and ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 57 many a day ; and he is dying, and there does not seem the slightest sign of them being nearer ; and if anybody might have laid down to die and said, ‘‘ Well, my life has all been a failure, and a blunder, and here am I the victim of unfulfilled expectations,'' it was that man. But instead of that, he lays himself down and says, ‘‘ I die, and God shall be with you ; carry my bones up with you," and he puts his hands upon the heads of the boys and says : They shall be great in the land which God shall give you for a possession.” And so his confidence has rounded off, to his own apprehension, the loose, fragmentary, and broken life, into completeness and beauty ; and he felt that for all the past — and that comes ou,t most lovelily in his words — that for all the past, that had seemed so strange, so perplexing, so sad while it was passing, there was a living reason. He looks at his son, and says, “And I did not think I should ever see your face again, yet God hath let me see your boys,” and then he pats their heads and says, “ Looking back here, I see God that was my Shepherd all my life long, the angel that redeemed me from all evil, — bless the lads.” The past is beautiful, beginning to be intelligible, shaping itself into symmetry and meaning, into significance and mercy, the unaccomplished hopes are still true hopes, his dear ones he leaves to God ; and so he says, “ My hope is strong, dying as it was living ; I know in whom I have believed, I know His faithful promise, I know I shall share in that.” Let us set our confidence on the living love of the Divine Christ, and then when we come to die, if the life may have been failure, and sorrow, and disappointment, and many sins, we may be able to look forward and say, like that old patriarch prophet — “ God’s promise shall be fulfilled, I shall enter into the rest.’' By the side of that noble passing away of the Old Testament hero, set the triumphant one in the new. By the side of Jacob the patriarch put Paul the apostle; “I have fought the fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith ; henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness.” These lived and died in faith. In that faith may you and I live and die. 58 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES VIII. The waters of Marah. Exod. xv. 23-25. And when they ca7ne to Marah^ they could not drink of the waters of Marah ^ for they were bitter : therefore the name of it was called Marah, And the people murmured against Moses, saying. What shall we di ink I And he cried unto the Lord ; and the Lord showed him a tree, which when he had cast into the waters, the waters were made sweet : there he made for them a statute and an ordinance, and thei e he proved the7uP There is no more dismal bit of country, perhaps, in the world than that strip of desert sea-coast which goes by the name of the wilderness of Shur, through which the Israelites were called upon to march immediately after passing the Red Sea. Sand and gravel, and limestone rock, all beaten upon with the pitiless glare of the sun, full in the eyes of this caravan of fugitives, as they marched due south for three days. They had no means of refreshing their needs, and one can understand how as the third day came to an end, and the long weary march was drawing to an end too, and the evening quietness came ; how when they saw away on the horizon the feathered tips of the palm-trees that told of water, their drooping spirits would revive, men would stagger along a little less apathetically. And when they came to the spring there was an iridescent scum on the surface, and as travellers tell us the very worst water in all the peninsula ; and one man tries and spits out the first mouthful, and another man tries but cannot manage it, — although he is half-dead with thirst it won’t go down, and they cannot drink the water ; and they call the name of it, with breaking hearts, ‘‘ Marah ! ” And there were the little children that had never been accustomed to anything but ease in Egypt, and the burdened women with their kneading troughs on their shoulders, and the despairing fathers, a crowd of fugitives, and they all turn upon Moses, and cry against him, and Moses does the right thing. ‘‘ He cried unto the Lord, and the Lord showed him a tree,” or a bit of wood, for the word does not necessarily mean a living tree ; and Moses puts it into the water, and the water becomes sweet ; and, says the narrative, summing it all up, “ there he made a statute and an ordinance,” that thing, the bitter water, and the sweetening and the thirst. ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 59 that is the statute for you, and an ordinance ; “ and there he proved them.” Well, now the first thing I want you to notice, for these last words vindicate us in taking this story to mean something more than itself, as being the embodi- ment of a perpetual principle that applies all round and all ways, or in the old-fashioned language of the text, “ is a statute and an ordinance.” The first thing I want you to notice is this — Where is Marah ? Close by the Red Sea. That is to say, cheek-by-jowl with the triumph, the first stage in the wilderness. As soon as the men got across and began their march, there is a couple of days or so at the first halting place to shake themselves together, and get themselves into order ; and then the next stage is into this wilderness, this desert, and the next halting-place is out on that waterless plain. Like a steamer going out of Dover harbour, the one minute safe behind the stones, the next minute as soon as she gets outside the pier the whole surge of the waves upon her. Not going sailing down along some white ridge, like a ship going down the Thames a long time before it gets into broken water, but out into it at once, one plunge and there you are. Yesterday, they were crossing the Red Sea, with signs and wonders, to-day journeying through the waterless and dreary plain of sand. That is to say, God’s road is generally very near its begin- ning a bit of ugly country, that will try a man’s strength and his patience. Good old John Bunyan saw that the Slough of Despond was very near the wicket gate; and that is an old-fashioned way of putting an everlasting truth, that all good things worth doing, all Christlike life, and all high life of every sort, is hard at the beginning. Gram- mar is always drudgery, the rudiments are always difficult to learn, the apprenticeship is the worst bit of it. We may be quite certain that we are not on God’s road if every- thing goes smoothly; and as a rule. His paths are rough and tangled at the beginning, and only afterwards do they broaden out, and open wide to us. The world does the opposite way ; claps a bait upon the hook, entices men into wrong paths by giving them sweetness at the beginning and the bitter afterwards. “Young gamblers always win, the devil takes care of that ! ” says the old proverb. So the man at the feast said, “ when men have well drunk, then that which is worse, but 6o EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES thou hast kept the good wine until now/’ So in religious experience, when a man gets converted and brought near Jesus Christ, and finds out the depth of his own sin, and the height of God’s love .and mercy, very commonly there comes surging over his heart not very long afterwards a great regurgitation, as it were, of the evil that he thought he had got rid of ; and a season of sadness and bitterness, measured often by the depth of his former joy and rapture. The crossing of the Red Sea yesterday, Marah and its bitterness to-morrow ; and even if it is not so always, there is at any rate the big rule which is usually fulfilled in our experience, although upward and onward, yet God’s paths have a trying bit very near the beginning, and even for the husbandman who laboureth first and is afterwards partaker of the fruit. But that is not all. Marah, as I said, was next door to the Red Sea ; but Elimjvas next door to Marah. Hear how the story goes on after that bit which I have been reading to you. “ And they came to Elim, where were twelve wells of water,” one for each tribe ; “ and three- score and ten palm-trees,” one for each elder, “ and they encamped there by the waters.” How sweet the water, how grateful the shade, how blessed the change from yes- terday with the bitter saline filth standing in the puddle there. Who can tell what made the Elim waters sweet } Yesterday’s experience ! What made the shade of the palm-trees so precious } The unsheltered blaze of yester- day’s sunshine. And so, never fear ! Our lives will be carried out of the one into the other in God’s own good time ; and as sure as any of us may to-day be in Marah, to-morrow^ we shall be in Elim, for there is no human life but is passed, by a loving wise hand, through the alternations of bright and dark, summer and winter, both co-operate to the blessed harvest. So^if any of you are camping by the side of the bitter waters, do not let' your sorrows cause you to for- get yesterday’s triumph, nor your hopes fail before you grasp to-morrow’s rest and peace. That is where Marah was. \ Now, the next thing I want you to notice is, the r ight and the wrong way of dealing with the bitterness. They “murmured,” and “Moses cried unto the Lord.” Two ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 6i ways of using your tongues about your troubles ; on^Js to gruniHe and the oU^ to pray. Two ways of speech and thought. One is to set our backs up against what we have to carry, ^nd the other is to go to God and say — “ Help us, O Thou who hast laid this upon us ! ” “ They murmured against God.” What! have you for- gotten all His past dealings with you this last week al- ready ? “ They murmured against God I ” Why it is only two or three days since you were slaves in the land of Goshen there I You came out jubilant. Where is all your jubilation gone ? Is a little thing like this going to turn your thankfulness into murmuring, and embitter your life ? There are some people that have got a wonderful habit ; if there is one little bit of cloud in their sky no bigger than a man’s hand they go talking about it as if it were a great black thunder cloud that covered the whole zenith and threatened to drown them. You may always make your life a pattern of brightness inlaid upon darkness, or of darkness inlaid upon brightness just as you like to view God’s path. It is like a man lying in bed, half asleep, he gazes through his closing eyes and amuses himself with making figures out of the paper, some- times taking one of the colours for a background, and sometimes another ; and the whole aspect changes when he changes a different colour for his background. And so with your lives. You may either grumble or pray about them, one or the other you will certainly do. It is the alternative for every one of us. We have thorns enough in our pillow, and burdens enough to carry. Let us never bend our backs till we know the burden is laid on them. We have miles enough to travel. Never let us start until we are quite certain that we have got hold of God’s hand to keep us steady, patient, and cheerful, or we shall certainly be amongst the grumblers and the murmurers. So it seems to me to be a choice ; either we shall be mur- murers against some poor brother Moses or other, or else look up above the pigmies, the creatures, and the things, look right away up to Him and all our murmurings will die, and we shall go about with piayers and not with grumbling when once we have got hold of Him. Well now, the next thing that is here is the se cret of turning the bitter waters into sweet. It is a very remark- 62 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES able form which the miracle takes here. God concealing Himself behind Moses; hiding Himself, so to speak, behind a material vehicle for His miraculous power, — something in the same fashion in which our Lord fell Himself, of complying with different customs and methods of doing wonders ; to send one man to bathe in the pool of Siloam, to another using saliva in order to heal him, a touch of the finger to a third. And so God here does not do the thing straight away, but He puts in, between Himself the cause and the healing of the waters the result, two links — Moses and a bit of wood. The reason I do not know that we can find out, nor whether it would do us much good if we could. But at any rate there is a great similarity between this His first miracle of education which He wrought for these Israelites in the wilderness, and the first miracle of judgment wrought upon the Egyptians. This is making bitter water sweet ; that was making sweet water — the Nile — bitter. Then, as to the object, a bit of wood. This sweetening of the waters was done with a bit of wood, the tree, or whatever it was that was cast into the watei'*; the Nile was embittered by a bit of wood — the rod of Moses. There may be a parallel, I do not know whether there is or not, but at any rate it is worth noticing. But putting that aside, what is the means by which we can turn all the bitterness into sweetness ? Well, one can scarcely help noticing this, and thinking of the tree as shadowing another Tree, the Tree of Life, the Cross, which being put into any bitterness turns it into sweetness. That is to say according to the great words: “Consider Him that endured such contradiction of sinners against Himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds.” Consider Him, and the word used there is a very special one, it means “ consider,” in the light of comparison, compare your sufferings with Christ’s. “Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin.” Compare His sorrows. His patience, His innocence ; think of these things. “ And did my Lord suffer,” as good John Newton put it : — “ And did my Lord suffer, And shall 1 repine 1 Put that Tree of Life into the bitterest fountain that we have to drink, and it becomes sweet. ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 63 But there is another side of the same thought, the secret of making all bitterness sweet is the recognition of, and the acquiescence in, God’s perfect loving will as manifested in the trial. I do not believe there is any consolation for a great many of the troubles that we all have to bear sooner or later except that. A man stands beside his dead, and people go and pester him with the threadbare com- monplaces of conventional Christian consolation ; and he is ready sometimes to turn upon them with — “Miserable comforters are ye all ! ” Oh ! there is only one thing that will give ease to a m‘an, the loving will of a loving Father. Get that into my heart and then the fieriest showers will fall soft like snowflakes, cooling and refreshing upon my heart, and I shall be able to bear it all. And there is nothing else, nothing in all the universe, that will arm you and me against “ the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,” and the wild sea of troubles that comes storming upon every man some time or other, except only that one thing : “ It is the Lord, let Him do as seemeth Him good which being cast into the waters, the waters are healed. And they change their places. Marah becomes Elim, and the twelve wells open in the wilderness, and there are streams in the desert. IX. Balaam. Num. xxiv. ii. Therefore now flee thou to thy place : I thought to promote thee unto great honour ; hut, lo, the Lord hath kept thee back from honour P Balaam lived in circumstances sufficiently unlike our own. But human nature does not change with the change of civilisations, and the human conscience face to face with truth and with duty repeats its experiences, its efforts, its failures, its triumphs in the most distant climes and ages. Let us endeavour to study this history, however briefly, in a practical temper, and with a view to our own im- provement. I. Balaam, it need hardly be said, was a very eminent, he was even an extraordinary man. He lived largely among the wild race of the Midianites ; but he had gifts and powers which, so far as we know, were entirely unshared by those among whom he dwelt. 64 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES He was, first of all, an observer, a careful observer of contemporary events. He was a man of trained political sagacity. In his last recorded prophecy we see how much interest he felt in the future of the neighbouring peoples, of the wild Kenite tribes, of the kingdom of Amalek, of the great monarchies of Central Asia, of the navies which had already begun to connect Palestine with the Western world. He was one of those men who generally look on at public life rather than take part in it, but whose judg- ment is valued by men of action as being the product of more reflection and experience than their own. Balaam thus corresponds to a writer on history or on politics among ourselves, who does not go into Parliament, but whose deliberate opinions have more weight than those of many Parliamentary speakers. He was consulted, he was allowed for, he was obeyed by energetic people on all sides of him, who felt at least that he saw farther than they did, and who were glad to lean on his advice and his directions. And next, Balaam was in possession of a truth which, quite apart from its awful and intrinsic value, gives purpose and meaning to a human life ; he believed in one God. He lived, we know not for how long, in the Mesopotamian city of Pethor ; and here he might very well have fallen in with the descendants of those relatives of Abraham who, like Nahor, did not accompany Abraham in his migration to Canaan ; and from these he may have learnt the know- ledge of the one true God. This great truth was at the basis of Balaam's thought all through, although he held it in an inconsistent combination with Pagan practices of soothsaying and divination. He would seem to have fallen to a certain extent under the influence of the degraded public opinion around him, and so to have endeavoured to combine his purer faith with the popular heathen sorcery ; just as we see people nowadays unite a serious profession of the Christian faith with proceedings and opinions which it really condemns. However, Balaam's knowledge of re- ligious truth, so far as it went, gave him great power among his countrymen, and it led him, as was natural, to take a deep interest in the fortunes of the people of Israel. P>om his recorded prophecies it is plain that he had heard of the promises made to the Jewish patriarchs, that he knew something of the text of the Jewish records. He uses the ON THE OLD TESTAMENT 65 Holy Name itself, which was revealed to the Jews. He must have heard of the remarkable circumstances attend- ing the deliverance of the Israelites from Egypt. Those circumstances had produced a profound impression on all the peoples of the south-eastern seaboard of the Mediter- ranean and the adjoining tribes. And while the fear and the dread of Israel fell on all the Amorite races, and while in particular Moab was sore afraid of the people because they were many, and Moab was distressed because of the children of Israel, Balaam would have been able to study the secret of Israel’s deliverance from Egypt, and of Israel’s successful advance across the desert, through his possession of the key of religious sympathy. The heathen around him saw in Israel's history the triumph of physical force, the triumph of good fortune, the triumph, at the best, of certain imaginary divinities like their own. Balaam knew enough to know that the explanation lay far deeper ; and this knowledge, at any rate for a time, would have given clearness and decision to his judgment, and force and con- sistency to his action. But, besides this, it is clear that Balaam was endowed in a high degree with the gift of supernatural prophecy. Not only could he anticipate the future more rapidly and accu- rately than ordinary men by the trained use of his natural faculties, but he had also the gift of prophetic insight into a future too remote, too unlike the actual present, to be anticipated at all by the unaided faculties of man. Of this gift his closing words to Balak afford one remarkable speci- men. His prediction of the Star and Sceptre that were to arise out of Jacob is not fully satisfied by the conquests of David, of Omri, of Hyrcanus, but points to the spiritual empire of Jesus Christ. And here we may pause for a moment to take note of the fact that a stranger to Israel, living among a heathen people, himself practising heathen arts, should have been thus distinguished by the possession of a great religious and supernatural gift. Israel alone was the people of Revelation in the ancient world, and yet here an accredited organ of revelation is found far beyond the frontiers of Israel, and his utterances are actually honoured with a high place in the sacred books of Israel. Now, this is in keep- ing with what we find in the whole course of God’s deal- F 66 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES ings with man. God makes governments ; He creates and authorises sacred institutions ; He bestows the certificate of His presence and His approval here, and He withholds it there. And yet he is not so bound by His own rules that they confine His action besides compelling it. He shows ever and anon that His illimitable and exuberant life has outlets which lie beyond the bounds of consecrated system. Balaam was in one age what Melchisedec had been in another, what Job was in a third — an organ of truth beyond the frontiers of the kingdom of truth. And when, in our day, we see beyond the limits of the Church, beyond the limits of Christianity, conspicuous gifts, if not quite religious, or beautiful and even saintly characters that throw into the shade much that we find nearer home, within the enclosure of the sacred garden of the soul, this does not prove that God has done away with the ordinary rules and bounds of His dispensations of grace and truth ; it only proves this, that those rules do not always confine His action. Balaam, though not of Israel, was still a great prophet ; and this supernatural gift of prophecy en- riched the political and religious knowledge which he had acquired naturally, enriched it with a new element of power. Now, with gifts like these, Balaam was naturally a per- son of great public consideration. Among the Midianites he took rank even with the princes. His fame spread far and wide among the neighbouring peoples, especially among the Moabites. Balak, the king of Moab, was in all probability himself a Midianite, wh6 had taken the place of a native dynasty when Moab had been weakened by the Amorite victories ; and Balak would therefore have had opportunities of know- ing what was thought of Balaam elsewhere. But men with no knowledge or interest in religions of their own are apt to make very odd guesses about those who are in any way connected with them. Balak seems himself to have looked upon Balaam chiefly as a very powerful wizard. Balaam's higher gifts would be scarcely intelligible to Balak ; or, at any rate, they were not what Balak wanted in the existing circumstances of Moab. Moab and its king were seriously alarmed at the steady, the persistent advance of the host of Israel towards their destined home in Canaan. Israel ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 67 had now passed the desert, and was encamped in the plain of Moab, the low, flat district along the Jordan and the Dead Sea, which is fertilised by the brooks that run west- ward from the Pirathon Hills. And from these, their neighbouring heights, the Moabites could look over the camp of Israel. There was Israel encamped in his num- bers, which were probably exaggerated by the terrors of the invaded Moabites ; and Balak longed to strike a swift and decisive blow. He thought that if a great soothsayer like Balaam could be induced to devote the Israelites to destruction by a solemnly pronounced and public curse, then there would be no doubt about the issue of the im- pending, the inevitable struggle with Israel. “ I wot,'’ he said to Balaam, ‘‘ that he whom thou blessest is blessed, and he whom thou cursest is cursed.” In Balak's eyes, you see, Balaam was simply a weapon of offensive warfare. He had only to be brought into position where he might bear upon the enemy in order to produce results of decisive importance. Balak’s view of Balaam illustrates the way in which in all ages statesmen who are statesman and nothing else are apt to look upon religion and its representatives. They see in it only one of the great forces which modify and control human life ; and they desire, by whatever means, to enlist it on the side of the policy or the Government which they for the moment represent. They do not take the trouble to understand what it is in itself. They do not see that it has obligations, laws, principles, which cannot be trifled with, if it is not to forfeit its essential character. They look at it, not from within, but from without ; they measure it, not by its inspiring motives, but only by its social and popular results ; and, as a consequence, they often make very great miscalculations about it, especially in cases where the absence of insight into the results of a religious creed upon human action, which comes from their lack of faith in that creed, is not compensated for by the sympathetic imagination which enables a man to put him- self readily into the mental and moral circumstances of those who differ from him. Now, this was Balaam’s case. It was quite clear that Balaam.’s gift would be placed at his disposal unreservedly so he thought, if he only paid a sufficient price for it. If 68 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES a first bid did not succeed, then he would make a second and a larger bid. He did not regard Balaam as having a God or a conscience to consult. Balaam was in his eyes simply a merchant of preternatural wares with a particular useful commodity to dispose of ; and the only question was to ascertain his price. This mistake as to the availableness of religion for any political purpose that may be immediately in view has been made in all ages of the world's history. Saul made it when, in his off-hand way, he offered sacrifice without waiting for Samuel ; Jeroboam made it, when he tried to set up a new religion at Dan and at Beersheba, which was to supersede the old duties of the tribes towards their temple and their priesthood at Jerusalem ; the princes of Judah made it, when in the last days of the monarchy of Judah they endeavoured to force Jeremiah to advocate what they thought the patriotic policy of reliance on Egypt against Babylon. History is studded with examples of this mistake, which underlies, for instance, Hume’s well-known advocacy of an established Church. Hume advocates what is oddly called the establishment of religion by the State ; because, he says, this enables the State to take the religious principle well in hand, and so to repress its tendency to become a fanaticism, and to enlist it on the side of measures which the State may deem expedient. Without discussing how far this theory is borne out by experience, we may observe that perhaps the most singular illustration of the error in question was afforded by the first Napoleon. When that extraordinary man had conducted the campaign of Austerlitz to a brilliant conclusion, he addressed himself, and with his usual energy, to religious questions. If at this time he had any creed at all, it was the creed of a half-convinced Deist. But for Napoleon religion was always chiefly a political instru- ment. He professed warm devotion to Mahometanism during the campaign of Egypt ; he wrote to Pius VII. as a devoted son of the Roman Church, as a second Charle- magne. Napoleon then, in 1806, thought that his dynasty would be safer if the duty of devotion to himself and his dynasty could be introduced into a catechism which should be used in all the dioceses of France ; and accord- ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 69 ingly, under the head of the Fifth Commandment, a little political treatise — for such in effect it was — was framed in the shape of question and answer, in which children were told that they must obey the General who had recently suppressed the Republic by force, who had re- cently murdered the poor Bourbon prince that had fallen into his hands, and this under pain of eternal condemna- tion. Christianity owes all the support that she can give to existing Governments ; but this general principle may be pressed to untenable lengths in particular cases. Napoleon's catechism was criticised, it was protested against, it was slightly modified, but as a whole it was received, it was taught in all the French dioceses for eight years, that is, until the peace. But acceptance of such a document as this cost the French clergy their moral influence ; and Napoleon lived too entirely outside the sphere of con- science to understand that, by carrying his point against them, he had done his best to destroy that very power whose support he was anxious to secure. To return. Balak set himself to work to enlist Balaam's gifts and powers on the side of Moab against Israel. First, a deputation carrying the rewards of divination, the price which was to be paid for the public curse which Balaam was to pronounce, went to him and failed. It was followed by a second deputation composed of much more influential people, and promising Balaam very great honour if he would comply with Balak’s request. In the end this depu- tation succeeded so far as to induce Balaam to go back with it to Balak. II. Here we are face to face with a difficult question — the real character of Balaam. This subject was much discussed in the ancient Christian Church, and there were two very different opinions about it. On the one hand, Balaam was regarded by St. Augus- tine and others as a thoroughly bad man, as a devil’s prophet, who was compelled by God, against his will, like the demoniac in the Gospel, to utter truths for which he had no heart. On the other hand, St. Jerome and others considered Balaam a good man in the main and a prophet of God, who fell through yielding to the temptations of avarice and ambition. The truth probably lies somewhere between the two 70 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES opinions. Balaam was a mixed character, and the real problem that has to be dealt with, as we read his history with a practical object, is to discover, if we can, the ingre- dients of the proportions of the mixture. On the one hand, Balaam was a man with a clear idea of duty based on a certain knowledge of God. He knew enough about God to feel that when there was no mistake about God’s will it must be obeyed, if only for reasons of prudence. He knew enough of God’s dealings with Israel to fear to trifle with God’s plain commands. When he was asked by Balak to curse Israel, he did not answer the question without first asking God for guidance ; and when he was told by God that he must not accept the invitation, he at once declined. ‘‘ The Lord refuseth me leave to go with you.” When the invitation was renewed, he was equally decided. ‘‘ If Balak would give me his house full of silver and gold, I cannot go beyond the word of the Lord my God, to do less or more.” He only went at last when he had, as he thought, satisfied himself that God permitted him to do so. And Balaam’s sense of duty is not less observable when he had joined Balak. Balak naturally thought that if Balaam once came, there would be no further difficulty. But Balaam was careful to explain at once that he was not at all free to say just what he or Balak might wish. ‘‘ Lo, I am come unto thee. Have I now any power at all to say anything? The word that God putteth in my mouth, that shall I speak.” And so it happened. First there was a sacrifice at the royal residence of Kirjath-huzoth ; and then the next day Balaam was solemnly taken to Hamath- Baal, a high hill connected with the Baal-worship, and commanding a full view over the camp of Israel, and there God met him, apparently condescending to manifest His will even through the pagan auguries which Balaam con- sulted, and Balaam blessed Israel altogether.” And then, when Balak remonstrated, Balaam asked, “ Must I not take heed to speak that which the Lord hath put in my mouth ?” and Balak probably thought that there was some sinister influence at work in the spot or in the air, or that Balaam had been unduly impressed with the imposing spectacle of the entire camp and host of Israel ; and so they moved to another point nearer the encampment of ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 71 Israel, but commanding a much less complete view of it, as it would have been apparently shut out from view by a projecting spur of Mount Pisgah. And here again the altars are built, and the sacrifices offered, and the auguries consulted ; and Balaam prophesied, and again he cele- brated the strength and the assured victory of Israel under the Divine protection. There was, he said, no enchant- ment against Jacob; there was no divination against Israel ** Behold, I have received a commandment to bless, and I cannot reverse it.’’ And Balak was in despair — just as a man might be who has set a machine in motion whose work- ing he is totally unable to guide or to control; he begged the prophet neither to curse Israel at all nor to bless it at all ; silence would be better than these unlooked for blessings ; but Balaam is still true to his text : “ Told I not thee saying. All that the Lord sayeth, that must I do?” One more trial, Balak thought, might yet be made. Balaam was taken by Balak to a spot celebrated then, celebrated afterwards, further north, — Baal-Peor, which looked over the waste valley below, and in which the Moabite king fondly hoped that the prophet might at last feel himself able to curse Israel ; and the altars are built, and the sacrifices offered, but, instead of again con- sulting the auguries, Balaam looked out over the camp of Israel, which was still, though in the distance, within his view ; and the Spirit of the Lord came upon him ; and this time the blessing was more explicit than ever before : all the pictures which are most welcome to the inhabitants of the burning desert — the well-watered valley, the fertile garden, the spice-bearing aloe, the noble cedar — are sum- moned in his poetry to describe the assured prosperity of Israel. Israel’s monarch was to be higher than the power- ful chief of the Amalekites, higher than Agag ; to bless Israel was to be certainly blessing ; to curse Israel was to be certainly cursing. And here Balak’s dismay gave way to indignation. “Therefore now,” he said, “flee thou to thy place ; I thought to promote thee unto great honour ; but, lo, the Lord hath kept thee back from honour.” And again Balaam reminded Balak that he had warned him of what might happen ; and then he proceeded to utter a closing prophecy, which foretold the conquest of Moab 72 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES itself by Israel, and the history of the other neighbouring peoples, and above all, the appearance of the Star of Jacob, under Whom Israel was to advance to the spiritual dominion of the world. Throughout these circumstances Balaam apparently speaks and acts as a man who has a law of duty clearly before him, and who courageously obeys it. Balak was right in saying that the Lord had kept him back from honour. Whatever earthly wealth or consideration was in store for him at the court of Moab, this he forfeited alto- gether by his persevering obedience to the voice of God. Self-sacrifice is always respectable, and Balaam had his share in it. For the moment he might almost seem to rank with prophets and with apostles, and in that distant age, and according to his measure, to anticipate the reward of those great promises of the Gospel, ‘‘ Whosoever hath left father, or mother, or lands, or wife, or children for My sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit ever- lasting life.'' But, on the other hand, this devotion to duty was clearly accompanied by another characteristic which explains why Balaam was really an object of God's displeasure, and why he came to a bad end. Balaam, you remember, when he was first asked by Balak to come and curse Israel, referred the question to God in prayer, learned that he ought not to go, and accordingly refused to go. This ought to have been enough for his guidance afterwards. But when Balak made a second application, Balaam, after first of all declining it, allowed himself to treat the question as still open, and he consulted God again. And then God answered him again, but answered him according to the desire of his heart, and bade him go. He did go, and God's anger was kindled because he went, and as he went on his journey he saw the angel of the Lord standing in the way, and his sword drawn in his hand. - How are we to explain this apparent inconsistency be- tween the Divine command to go and the Divine anger at Balaam's obedience } Surely, by saying that the second answer of God to Balaam's inquiry was a reflection, not of God's will, but of Balaam's secret wish. There is such a thing — let us take note of it — as the creation of a false conscience. We may wish that a particular line of con- ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 73 duct might be our duty, until we persuade ourselves that it is really' our duty, that it is really what God would have us to do. If instead of acting upon right when we know it to be right, we pray for further knowledge of duty, we may pray ourselves into belief that wrong itself is right. How easily this may be done, how unobserved and secret the process of doing it may be, is only too apparent to any man who keeps his eyes about him in our daily life. Some of the worst things that have been done in human history have been done by persons who have acted on what was at the time to them a sense of duty. But then the sense of duty has been a perverted sense ; and the perversion has not seldom arisen from the secret dis- position to read human and personal wishes into Divine laws and rules. When we are once clear about a particular portion of God’s will we ought not to reconsider it unless some en- tirely new facts come to light, which plainly make a real difference in the case before us. In Balaam’s case, the problem of duty was exactly the same on the occasion of the second application that was made to him on the occa- sion of the first. The persons who urged it were more important, the bribe that was offered was higher ; but this did not for a moment affect the hard question of duty. To reopen that question was to play a trick with con- science ; and one such trick deliberately played with con- .science may easily be fatal. Balaam’s sense of duty did not give way all at once. We have seen how once, twice, and again he held out against the inducements and the importunities of Balak, and uttered the unwelcome truth which God put in his mouth. But, for all that, his moral constitution was sapped by a fatal wound ; his notion of duty was clearly not what he could discover to be God’s will, but only what God would not allow him to ignore. It was, as we say, a minimising rule of duty; and, wherever this is the case with a man, a moral catastrophe on a great scale is always possible. Balaam, the author of some of the most lofty and inspiring sayings, of the most majestic prophecies in the Old Testament Scriptures, ended by suggesting that a hideous temptation to iniquity should be placed in the way of the people whose moral superiority he had himself acknowledged ; and he died fighting against 74 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES the cause whose victory he had, at the cost of great per- sonal sacrifice, proclaimed as certain. III. There are three considerations which the history suggests. The ministry of grace and truth to others may be quite independent of the personal character of the minister. Truth and grace are God’s gifts, not man’s. Man is at best an organ of the Divine utterances, the channel through which the Divine influence flows. God does not put Himself in the hands of His human instruments to such an extent as to make His purpose of mercy or of illumination depend on the personal consistency of His ministers with the commission they bear. The profession of a prophet, or a priest, or a clergyman, is one thing ; his vocation is another. The first is conferred in the Church of Christ by a valid ordination ; it is independent of the character of the recipient. The second is the antecedent and inward work of the Holy Spirit in the recesses of the character, and it alone brings the character into harmony with the work and the powers that fall upon the outward benediction of Christ in His Church. Balaam is a very ancient and awful instance of the profession of a prophet wielded by a man who had no true inward vocation to prophecy. And Church history records many an example of men who have taught or worked with conspicuous success, yet have failed in the elements of personal devotion to Him whose livery they wear. As to their future our Lord has in merciful severity warned us : “ Many will say to Me in that day. Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Thy name, and in Thy name cast out devils, and in Thy name done many won- derful works 1 and then will I say to them, I never knew you.” Another consideration is, how possible it is to know a great deal about the truth, to make sacrifices for it, to be kept back from honour out of deference to its high re- quirements, and yet to be at heart disloyal to it. When Balaam returned to Midian, he probably reflected, as men speak, with just pride on the manner in which he had conducted himself. He had been exposed to a sharp trial ; he had stood it well ; he had resisted flattery, bribery, force ; he had been as good as his word ; what ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 75 had he not resigned at the call of duty ? What had he not achieved for the cause of truth ? And yet below all this there was the question, the fundamental question, as to the rectitude of his secret will. The surface obe- dience might cover, it did cover, an inward rebellion. There are in every generation lives like his. We seem to be gazing on the rosebud, perfect in its form and in its colour, but a worm is eating away the petals, and they will pre- sently wither and fall. Lastly, the true safeguard against such a fate as Balaam’s is the love of God. Love is the salt which alone in this poor human nature of ours saves the sense of duty from decomposition. Had Balaam loved God besides knowing Him, he would not have asked for guidance a second time. One intimation of the will of those whom we love is enough, always enough, for a sincere affection. Love rejoices to obey, not because obedience is welcome to self, but because obedience is agreeable to him who is the object we love. Love rejoices in opportunities of resisting self ; for love in its very essence is the renunciation and the gift of self, for the sake of another, to another, whether God or man. Let us pray God that this great gift may be poured into our hearts by His Holy Spirit, that loving Him above all things we may obtain His promises, which indeed throw into the shade all earthly objects, which exceed all that we can desire. H. P. L. X. Joshua. Deut. xxxIv. 9. And Joshua the son of Nun was full of the spirit of wisdom ; for Moses had laid his hands upon hhn : and the children of Israel hearke7ied unto him^ and did as the Lord co7nmanded MosesP Joshua was selected to finish the work of Moses; and it was of the first importance that the ideas, even in this remote era, of Moses should be continued, and that the whole spirit of his work should be promulgated. We may be sure that part of the endeavour of Moses’ life was to secure this. “Joshua the son of Nun was full of the spirit of wisdom ; for Moses had laid his hands upon him.” He 76 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES had received instruction from Moses. It was not done in a hurry, but through forty years, and, therefore, it lasted. It will not do to teach a man or nation hurriedly. We are disappointed sometimes because our thoughts, clear to ourselves, are not clear to others, or if our children do not understand the thought we have been giving them. Do not trouble yourselves about that ; go on, if you believe what you are saying, and after forty years you will perhaps make men who will continue your work. They will be worth the making. The excitable ones who rush into excitement about you, will, when the time of difficulties comes, fall away. They are not rooted, and when the sun of opposition shines they wither away. Moses made a firm, fixed man of his follower, because he worked on him for many years. Mark, Joshua was not a man like Moses ; on the contrary, Joshua’s nature was one entirely different from his own — a man whose genius was for war and not for law. Look- ing at himself through Joshua he saw his own faults in a different manner. That was wise ; and in truth the one thing Moses cared for was the thought, not the form, the eternal thought which came from God. This course was wise, it was prophetic. The thoughts Moses gave to the people were to be continued under different circumstances. They were to be continued during almost incessant war, and next in the national sentiment ; and he took care they should be cultivated and impelled in the mind of a warrior. And the results } Some things are kept like one by their unlikeness to each other ; respect and wonder and loving curiosity kindling respect and wonder and loving curiosity, and thus kindling themselves together. That was the friendship of these two men ; and it was the foundation of Joshua’s education for his work. The sketch I have given you is full of lessons for us, lessons I can only indi- cate. If any one wants, and you have anything to give them, do not neglect them because they are of a different nature to you. Dissimilarity of nature may be the one thing needed in order to carry on your thoughts afterwards in dissimilar circumstances from those which surround you. It pleases a man’s vanity to be reflected by his fellows ; but you will be foolish if you accept it. Your work given back ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 77 to you by reflection will be spoilt. It would stagnate first and then be utterly spoilt Seek for those to take your thoughts who have life in themselves, who will work their thoughts into yours, and who will give them new clothes in their own minds. For the one thing to be cared for and to secure, in truth, is the idea, and not its clothes. Of course you make the clothing, but the tendency is to dwell too much upon the clothing and to forget the truth itself. Do not be betrayed through vanity or the applause of men into that deadly error. Desire that the thought you possess or the truth you tell has new clothing put upon it through every change of circumstance ; but if you keep old clothes upon it, the thought gets useless because of the clothing, and by-and-by your thought that you prized so is thrown on the dust-heap until some one comes by and finds it, and the old clothing is .stripped off ; and when the old garments, all rotted, are taken off, then the thought is a beautiful thing, and the finder reclothes it again for man- kind. Thus take care, like Moses, that you have some one to give the truth to who will put a different clothing upon it ; like Christ, who gave His ideas to twelve men, all different in mind, so that tiiere might be diversities of opinion, differences of opinion, but the same truth in all. So far for the stating of the friendship and the education between Joshua and Moses. How does Joshua first appear before us? As a warrior. He keeps that place till near the end. He stands forth as the very spirit of war from the time when he stands on the mountain side and cries, “There is the noise of war in the camp.“ The very war cry stirred him, and gave birth to that terror-giving shout with which Israel always rushed to battle. He recalls the memory of one of the Greek heroes. We see himi in ambush and then turning like a lion upon the foe to destroy. We see him spear in hand calling upon the sun to stay and upon the moon to hold, while the pursuing host avenged their enemies — a splendid image of wild war, and he is its centre and inspiration. The career of battle, of which this was the last, began almost immediately after the exodus ; more than forty years before this time the battle with Anak took place. Then began Joshua’s training. No one can help seeing that Joshua’s temptation was to feel that it was through his genius Israel won. It was 78 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES not without reason, then, that the story makes Moses take him up the mountain, and while he looked into the dark- ness to leave Joshua on the outskirts. That was enough to take out of the man everything but his own sense of littleness. What overwhelming awe was his, those of us who have been alone upon the mountain or upon the sea when a mighty storm was raging, may conjecture. Then are we impressed with a deep conviction of God’s presence. So also was the lesson of humility learned by Joshua when upon the mountain. It was a lesson for life. No man thereafter could more undividedly carry out the idea that all the success was God’s alone. The next step in his training was to learn how to obey, wherefore he became the servant, the daily attendant of Moses. He learnt the duties which should belong to him as a leader, through being the personal assistant of the leader. And we see why. He did this, not because it gave him a name, but because he needed out of his simple heart to express his love for his master in delighted service. That is the very best in the world that can happen to a man who has in after life to rule and manage others, who had such work as Joshua had to do. It teaches him how to rule, the things that must be done if rule is to be suc- cessful. It teaches that the truest service is that done through love, that the ruler’s life must be such as to win love and conquer human affection, and that this is the true power of the governor. It was a lesson easily learned by Joshua. It seems that this teaching of him to obey and to be humble went even still further, and that he was taken away from being a war leader. We do not see him mentioned in the succeeding wars ; he stops behind with Moses. This- is curious. It makes us think of the wonderful ways of God for him. He was not only to be a warrior, but was to guide the organization of the new national sentiment ; the founding of a government. He was to stay with Moses and learn how it was to be done, to make friends with the other leaders, with the other advisers of himself afterwards. Therefore he was now to lay aside his special type of work for the time. Again, had he alone led the host he might have been jealous of any one afterwards coming near his glory. He ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 79 was therefore kept in the background for a time. That was an excellent lesson ; he knew the stuff of the men he had to command, and he lost all envy and jealousy of others. He was willing to give others their due, and to consider himself one hero among many. We read in Numbers that he had been jealous with regard to two prophets, and had exhibited the spirit of a martinet. This would have been fatal to his success. As it was, Joshua got rid of all his jealousy and martinet spirit. Not one of the complaints such as we find against Moses seems to have been made against him. What a lesson is this not to be exclusive to those objects for which you have not a special genius ; to retire from those things you do, or think you do, so well, in order to learn the other side of things a little ; to balance and steady your powers, and to do that because you have met some one, like Moses, whose qualities you think higher than your own. This will do wonders for your character, will check the evil and balance the good of your character ; enable you to see others do well the very things you think you do well, and help you to see this without jealousy or opposition. It delights you now to find men excelling in your own special business, for you care now not for your own fame in the thing for which you have a genius, but for the beauty of the thing itself. Self has been wrought out of you. “Would to God,'’ you say, “all men were musicians and poets," because it is music and poetry you care for, and not your own reputation. That is a beautiful temper ; it is the highest temper to which an artist can arrive. Though Joshua was removed from generalship for a time, he was learning an invaluable lesson. He was sent out with eleven others to survey the land in preparation for invasion. With the sending him into the land was linked his future work as conqueror of the land. Moses changed his name. The new name enshrined his destiny, — a prince, a saviour. It was a kind of baptism of the man. Henceforth he knew what he had to do. It was a wonderful thing to have this new tenant in his heart ; and the change of name was but a faint symbol of the marvellous change within him. Just imagine as he went into Canaan, the intensity of his life. He was to conquer the land for the sake of the people, and the thought must 8o EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES have impressed him and given a new life to every act of his character. And it is delightful to picture to oneself the feelings that must have filled him as he went on day by day with the rest of the spies over the fields and villages and cities of the land he was to win, and where his fathers long ago had lived and suffered and died, and which he was permitted by God to conquer again. Full of enthusiasm he came back, one faithful com- panion with him sharing in his excitement and courage. Now what happened? Now at the very height of his eagerness all his dreams, all that he had suffered through these forty days, were suddenly dashed and shattered like a Venetian glass. When the people heard of the report of the spies they were fearful. “ Would God,” said they, “ that we had died in the land of Egypt ! or would God we had died in the wilderness. And wherefore hath the Lord brought us unto this land, to fall by the sword, that our wives and children should be a prey ? Were it not better for us to return into Egypt.” That was Joshua’s first trial, and truly it was sharp enough. Everything he loved and aspired to were shattered to pieces, and in the bitterness of his disappointment he might have been tempted to give way to their outcry, or to be untrue to the great object of his life. How did the man come out of this ? In those times when a man is so tested, we see the real stuff of which he is made. ‘‘And they (Joshua and Caleb) spoke unto all the company of the children of Israel, saying. The land which we passed through to reach it is an exceeding good land. If the Lord delight in us, then He will bring us into this land and give it us ; a land which floweth with milk and honey.” What vigour, what practical faith in God there is in all these words. Now listen to these courageous words : “ Only rebel not ye against the Lord, neither fear ye the people of the land, for they are bread for us ; their defence is departed from them, and the Lord is with us ; fear them not.” But the people stoned them. So the dream was shattered. It was a sorry thing for Joshua. He had to put quietly by his splendid anticipa- tions for many years. But he took two things with him — great courage, which we find in his speech, and great faith in God. I close with one or two remarks drawn from this. If we ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 8i are to do anything in our lives the time comes sooner or later. It came to Joshua, this time, when Moses re-named him and gave him his life work ; it came to David, when he was called to be king over Israel ; and it came to Christ, when he was baptized by John and went into the wilder- ness ; it came to Wordsworth on that dreary morning among the hills which he saw full of God, and when he was filled with thoughts of God ; it comes to all of us the day we feel, This is my work, I will do it, God helping me.” Our name is, as it were, changed ; we are baptized and consecrated by God. Some among you may be at that moment now. Have you, my brother, counted the cost, lest having taken up the work you leave it incomplete. See what lies before you ; search out the land you are going to conquer, going through it step by step, even as Gideon and the other scouts, finding out the difficulties; and may the courage and faith you have be such that you shall see “This is prepared for me,"' for I shall be faithful and accomplish my destiny. Some of you may have begun. How have you done it ? Well and bravely, or lazily and fearingly ? Having seen the difficulties, have you said in your heart, “ Would God that I could get back to Egypt.” Take this history as a warning — you will not get back to Egypt. You will wander and die in the wilderness, and as you look back you will know you have been untrue to your inspiration. It may not be so yet, there may be time to save your soul. The call is to-day, when you are baptized into your work, when the dew of its inspiration fills your soul like a summer’s garden in the morning, when you hear its voice to you, “This is the way ; walk ye in it,” or only if you recall enough to gain an impulse to go forward, thinking of how Joshua conquered, and of how Jesus the great Master rose from the dead with you. Have faith in God as your father, and in the courage of Joshua begin again. Be strong and very courageous, and all the powers of evil will fall before the faith and courage which you will receive from God Himself. S. B G 82 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES XI. The Captain of the Lord's Host. Josh. v. 13 - 15 . A7id it came to pass, whe7i Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, thei'e stood a ma7i over against him ivith his sword drawn m his hand : and Joshua went unto hun, and said u7ito him. Art thoti for us, or for our adversaries I And he said, Nay ; but as captain of the host of the Lord a7n I now come. And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto hi77i. What saith 7iiy lord unto his se7'vant ? And the captam of the Lord's host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot ; for the place whereo7i thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so," God’s revelations of Himself are always to be shaped by the momentary necessities of the people at the time they are made. They take the form and the pressure of the instant’s need, and vary according to the moment’s wants. And so here the army of Israel was just beginning a hard struggle, under an untried leader, — Moses had been left behind at Pisgah, — and now they had the Jordan behind them, and in front of them the strong, fortified, and seem- ingly impregnable city of Jericho, embosomed in the palm trees there ; and beyond it, the steep passes and the moun- tain land they wanted to win. So the soldiers of this army had no doubt their own cares and anxieties, and their leaders would feel the heavy responsibility of the occasion resting upon them ; and so their commander seems to have gone away by himself, and to have been brooding, as he had been brooding many a time before, how he was to get into that fortified city up there which barred his progress, and was a menace of defeat and overthrow. And lifting up eyes, as a meditative man will do, not expecting anything, having no prevision of a supernatural visitation, and lo,” as our story has it, he was startled by the appearance of an armed man, standing statuesque and picturesque in close proximity. As I have said, he had no notion of a super- natural vision ; mundane affairs were filling his mind, he has no preparation for anything of the sort, but with true soldier-like courage and promptitude, he strides up to him with the quick challenge ; “ Who do you belong to ; are you one of us, or do you belong to them from the city there ? ” And then the hitherto silent lips uttered the answer, I do ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 83 not belong to you, you belong to me ; as Captain of the host of the Lord am I come up” And then down upon his knees Joshua bends before him and recognises that he him- self is only second in command, and that this is the true Captain and Leader of the people. “What does my Lord say to thy servant ? ” Put off thy shoes from off thy feet, and then listen and I will tell thee how this Jericho shall be taken.” Without wasting your time with talk about this being legend or hallucination, or anything of that sort, and taking the story as we find it, with many large and valuable truths in it, I select one or two thoughts from it, and first of all I want to bring out more distinctly the profound significance of the person and the office of this Captain of the host of the Lord. Notice that in this story, for whatsoever reason, there is a strange blending together of the two elements, humanity and divinity, the apparent humanity, — distinct and separate from divinity, — and yet claiming the Divine attribute. The speaker as the Captain of the host of the Lord, does not distinctly say that the host is his, and yet he is the Captain of the host that obeys the injunction of Jehovah himself. And then you find him in the subsequent portion of the narrative, speaking as endowed with the full power of Jehovah, and recognised by the obedience of the Leader of Israel as being thus invested, and his word identified with the word of the Lord, and his commandment' with the commandment of God Himself. And you find still further that in the very page there come these words — “The Captain of the Lord's host said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot ; for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.” Holy, because he was there. Another thing. “ Loose thy shoes ” are a quotation. When the angel of the Lord appeared in the burning bush in the wilderness, these were the words that were spoken — “Loose thy shoes from off thy feet.” So far the story carries these points. A singular apparent identification with divinity, and a singu- lar apparent separation from it. But the quotation from the story of the appearance to Moses carries us a step further. We are to recognise in this same human figure, armed and commanding, that figure which appeared to Moses in the flame of fire out of the bush. If you will 84 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES turn to that story, you will find that in it the speaker is called the angel of the Lord, and that this angel of the Lord is spoken of with an elevation of tone, and an unhesi- tating application to him of Divine prerogative and func- tions, which separate him altogether from the hosts of created existences which stand before His throne who ‘‘ maketh His angels spirits, and His ministers a flame of fire.” And then that opens out the great wide door as to that old, difficult, and remarkable subject, as to the mean- ing and dignity and personality of the figure that appears glancing all through the Old Testament from Genesis to Malachi, the angel of the Lord. Let us glance at one or two brief quotations. I should ask you, then, to think of this first, the words of the dying patriarch when “he blessed Joseph, and said, God, before whom my fathers Abraham and Isaac did walk, the God which fed me all my life long unto this day, the Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads.” In one benediction and invo- cation “the God which fed me all my life long,” and “the angel which redeemed me from all evil,” are incorporated. Then there is that to which I have already referred, — the appearance in the burning bush to Moses. And then there is another one : “ The angel of the Lord encampeth round about them that fear Him, and delivereth them.” There is a strange blending of the reverence for divinity, and the protection of some mysterious person, — the angel of the Lord. And then hear the commentary which one of the later prophets makes upon this strange story about Jacob wrestling with the man concerning whom he said, “ I have seen God, and my life is preserved.” Hosea said he had power over the angel and prevailed ; he found him in Bethel, “ and there he spoke to us, even the Lord God of hosts.” And then the last of all the prophets of the old covenant, who gathers up into one so many of the threads that run through the whole series, seems to put upon it the top stone when he says, “ Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me : and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to His temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye de- light in,” etc. And now put that altogether,— and there is a great deal more than that, — and it seems to me that the answer to the ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 85 question, Who is this mysterious creature that from the beginning to the end of the earlier revelation, — parted from, and yet united with, the Divine name and nature, — whom the prophet Isaiah calls “ the angel of the face ; that the answer to the question. Who is he ? the answer is that it is T/ie Eter7ial Word that from the beginning was the agent of all Divine revelation, and who from the first manifested the Father's glory. And in these mysterious, evanescent, merely apparent assumptions of the human form and humart speech, was giving, as it were, a kind of preludings, and far- off preparations of that great, full, and perfect revelation of His, when the Word became flesh and dwelt amongst us." And so I think the answer to the question, — who is the Angel of the Covenant ? is, He who in the fulness of time, — made of a woman, made under the law, — came to redeem them that were under the law. There is another point before I come to the more practical teaching of this story, and that is, what I call the office and functions of this Captain of the Lord’s host. Whether you accept the idea that this is a Divine personal activity, or whether you believe that it is simply some created person or servant of the uncreated Divine power ; it re- mains the same — the Captain of the hosts of the Lord. And what are these hosts ? That little camp of the Israelites amongst the palm trees there ? Surely not. Is it the other camp which one of the patriarchs saw in his vision ; as the narrative says, in its archaic simplicity, “ The angels of the Lord met him, and he called the place Mahanaim " — that is, “ two camps ; " my little camp down here ? that great one up in the heavens ? There is included these personal existences dimly revealed which seem to gather round about us, but there is gathered in it all the forces of the universe, which is not chaos, — as the old Hebrews had found out long before natural science and philosophy had found it out, — but all obeying the Divine impulse and finger of the will that had created them ; thus, the stars in their courses, the seasons in their succession and order, the stormy winds, the dragons in the great deeps, every creature in the whole universe except those who by rebellious wills have run away from the fair order. These are the hosts, of whom this is the Captain. It seems to me, that none else or other than He, of whom 86 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES in later days it was said, ‘‘ All things were made by Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made,” was fit to rule with his Commander’s truncheon the mighty forces and embattled hosts of the universe, viz. Christ as the King, the King of kings, the Lord of lords, the Lord of nature, the Lord of angels, for they must be included, the Lord and Ruler of all that are, and they serve His purposes as Captain of the Lord’s hosts ! And then if this be anything like the true — howsoever inadequate — interpretation of the words before us I need not more than prompt you of how these thoughts are in immediate antici- pation of great New Testament thoughts ; Christ is the Prince of Peace. Yes, but Christ said, I came not to bring peace upon earth, but a sword ; ” and His peace is first of all righteousness, and not until the righteousness is secured is the peace proclaimed. His name, which is Jesus, is the same as the Captain and Leader in our story, — Joshua who led the people through many a hard fought field to victory ; and the Captain of the New Testament salvation shall lead men through many a struggle and difficulty and wavering hesitation and critical conjuncture, safe over the beleagured cities that stand in opposing strength thickly round our path, right through to the Heavenly Jerusalem beyond. His warfare is the exhibition of His love, His gentleness, His forgiveness, and His healing, in the face of all the powers of evil that set themselves against Him. And so Christ is the warlike Christ, warring a merciful warfare that knows no peace because it is righteousness. And so with this interpretation of the significance of the person and function that is set before us in this vision. And now I will try to put as simply as I can one or two broad lessons that come for all time out of this incident. Its significance in that petty incident in the history of the world has long since been exhausted ; and if it were only for the sake of this people this incident happened it would not be worth my while to consider it, but we must disengage these principles from the mere transitory things of which they are the revelation. So notice how this attitude of the mysterious person, of the angel of the Lord, carries with it great and everlasting truths upon which you and I may lean our whole weight. There are two different ways in which I look upon this incident : one of them, the great ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 87 warfare that is always going on in this world between God and the devil ; and the other, the narrower one, the battle- ground of which is my own heart, and the combatants are Christ and my own worldly lusts. And so with regard to the first thing, that He Himself, Jesus Christ, in no metaphor, in no exaggerated figure, in no mere influence of His patient action ; but by present helpfulness and present work takes part in the perennial fight that is going on in this world between good and evil, and strikes on the side of good. You remember that grand vision with which the gospel stories end, of the Lord lifted up in heaven ; and how one of the evangelists puts it in its most picturesque form when he says, “ He was lifted up and put on the right hand of God.'^ What a strange contrast this ! Is this Captain gone to some safe distance, and watching the fight down in the valley below, while the men are struggling with grim death — Himself with no smell of gun- powder on Him. Is that the kind of leader? God forbid. They went forth and preached everywhere, the Lord work- ing with them and confirming the word with signs following. Them down here. Him up yonder, breathing His influence over the field everywhere. The old legend that many a one has been strengthened with, of the two pale horse- men who had charged at the head of the soldiers on the plain of Marathon, all of these are but adumbrations of the truth that wherever a man for Christ’s sake strikes out against any kind of evil or abomination, he may be sure that he has Christ at his side. And how much soever we may feel that the work is nothing, and that all the talents that guide a wise and benevolent man are counteracted by the tendencies of human nature, do not let us be down- hearted and disappointed ; it is only the false appearance of things. The kingdoms ivill become the kingdoms of our God and His Christ ; and His help is not in vain and it is said truly of this, as is untruly said about another kind of conflict, that this battle, “though baffled oft is ever won.” Christ clashes His sword down into the scale; that out- weighs everything else. And you, weak man or woman, if you stand by yourself and the world against you, if you can say ‘‘Jesus Christ and I,” you and He would be in the majority, and your labour is not in vain in the Lord. So Christian man and woman, and all of you that in any 88 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES way are helping on that great cause, be of good cheer, and do not only look at these high battlements of that Jericho there, but lift up your eyes and behold the Captain of the hosts of the Lord. Take up your weapons and He will bring you victory. And so the same thoughts, with a brief and slight modification, apply to the other department in which that same metaphor is placed. Jesus Christ has fought all that fight that you and I have got to fight. No man can front a temptation which does not appeal to the experience and the memory of Him who began His career by facing the wilderness and the devil, and ended His career on the cross, which was an intense superlative of all temptations. And so when we come into the fight with the cavillings of our own hearts, when we try to get the mastery of our own passions, and to resist the temptations that beset us round about ; and when we begin to discover, after being beaten so often, how little strength we have of ourselves, let us think of Him who served in the ranks before He became commander, and who knows all about the battle, and do not go into the fight at your own charge. Do not fancy that your own firm resolution will enable you to repel temptation ; do not think that your own strength, or motives drawn from your own person, will be ever adequate to make you a conqueror in the fight with lust, and passion, and sense, and self, and earth, and the devil. You have not done it in the past — you will not do it in the future. Jericho will stand untouched as far as you are concerned unless you put yourself into His ranks, the ranks of the Captain of the hosts of the Lord. Be Christ’s soldiers and servants, and do not attempt a campaign in your own strength, or there is nothing before you except shame and defeat; but rather as this Joshua here, “What saith rny Lord unto His servant?” And you will get all the reply you want, and as you want it, and in the shape and at the time you need it, until at last you will be able to say, “ Now. unto Him that has made us more than conquerors, unto Him be praise and honour and glory for ever.” And He will fulfil the promise that He has made to us all, “To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with Me in My throne, even as I, the Captain and Leader, overcame, and am set down with My Father in His throne.” Amen. ON THE OLD TESTAMENT, 89 XII. Barak’s Faith. Jud. iv. 9. And she said,, I will surely go with thee: not^vithstanding the journey that thou takest shall not be for thine honour ; for the Lord shall sell Sisera mto the hand of a woniani*' Barak, to whom these words are spoken, is mentioned by name in the epistle to the Hebrews amongst the heroes of faith. It is not quite easy at first sight to see the reason for this selection. Who and what was Barak, as the Old Testament paints him, that he should have a place given him in the other half of the Bible, that half of the Bible which tells of life and immortality brought to light by the gospel } To answer this question we must look below the surface of the story, and then we shall see that in the personal insignificance of Barak lies the very reason of his everlasting renown. It is very interesting to fasten, in reading the books of the Old Testament, upon those shadows cast before by coming events and future revela- tions, which show the one Hand and the one Mind in the composition of the book. Although revelation is always progressive in its disclosures, and although as the Epistle to the Hebrews says, God spake in old times to the fathers in many parts and portions, rather than in full complete- ness, and although this method was essential to the educa- tion and intention of all God’s dealings, with the race as well as with the man, still it pleased Him to give here and there glimmerings and glimpses from the very beginning of the meridian Gospel-day ; enough, at least, to attest the continuity of the revelation and the divinity of the Re- vealer. Instances of this are very common. We have an example of it in the two chapters before us. And it is the more seasonable, perhaps, to notice it, because infidelity, sometimes clever, but always superficial and ignorant in its treatment of Scripture, has fixed upon the story of Sisera, and notably upon the panegyric of Sisera in the Song of Deborah, as one of the most assailable points in the Bible ; and therefore it is particularly desirable to call attention, as far as it can be done with truth, to beautiful points and traits in the actions and characters here set before us. It ought to be sufficient, so far as the taunt to which I have referred is concerned, to remind ourselves that there is no assertion whatever in the Bible of the inspiration of the 90 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES song of Deborah: ‘‘Blessed above women shall Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite be, blessed shall she be above women.” The chant may have been nothing more than the paean of a patriot over the deed which had set her country free ; it may, for anything told us in the Bible, have been no more prophetic utterance than the counsel of Balak which taught Balaam to cast a snare and deadly seduction before the children of Israel ; for anything con- trary to good morals in that burst of eloquent song, the Bible, and the God of the Bible, is no more responsible than for those terrible lapses of the Royal Psalmist, of which this is the solemn closing estimate, on the part of the Bible and its Author — “ But the thing which David had done displeased the Lord.” There is probably a deeper principle of interpretation involved in the question, namely, that in the field of morals itself, the revelation of God and the inspiration of God have not been precipitate, but gradual. Two revelations, certainly, avowedly waited for Christ Himself. The one was the revelation of immortality, and the other was the revelation of charity. Of both these, shadows were cast before. Saints walking closely with God had in them the instinct of immortality ; saints walk- ing mostly in God had in them the struggling, flickering light of charity. David could say, “ I will behold Thy face in righteousness, and when I awake up in Thy like- ness I shall be satisfied.” And David could say, in the far-off retrospect of his chequered and past youth, “ Is there not any of the house of Saul, that I may show the kindness of God unto him.?” These were rays and voices from the excellent glory, showing that above and beyond the clouds of human passion and ignorance, there was already and always a bright light in heaven. But these glimpses were by their nature exceptional and intermittent. As a rule, courage was then a higher virtue than patience, devotion than forgiveness, patriotism than charity. Let us, brethren, who have received the Christian revelation concerning these things, look to it that we lose not the stronger and sturdier virtues in the easy flatteries and the plausible compromises of a loose and flexible Christianity. The spirit of Deborah, in its very heartiness, may still teach us something — something which shall nerve the arm ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 91 for what Scripture calls “the resistance unto blood in striving against sin, while it may lend its energy to that most excellent grace, charity, out of which whosoever liveth is dead before his time ; it can never be superfluous to take off the edge of a moral difficulty in the paths of Divine revelation. The parade of such difficulties before minds unused to thoughtful inquiry, k^eps thousands and tens of thousands of our countrymen from the very porch and vestibule of God’s Word. Probably no argument, certainly no reproaches, will avail much for the reinstate- ment in faith and worship of men who have once admitted, willingly or unwillingly, the cruel objection, the more cruel sneer, the most cruel jest of an ingenious and industrious infidelity. These we must, by any or by all means, in duty and in mercy, endeavour to rescue ; and while here and there, by the grace of God, our efforts will be crowned with success, yet that success will rather be in the pro- vidential dealings of the Invisible wfith the lives and hearts of men, which they will then know must bow before a power and a love which cannot always be evaded or trifled with, and which will make them in the end confess in secret in their found-out soul — “Yes, there are mysteries in religion which I cannot fathom, but the mystery of mysteries is my own being. Yes, there are difficulties, moral difficulties, if you will call them so ; contradictions, discrepancies, if you will call them so ; but the difficulty of difficulties is how to be good and how to be happy, and the contradiction of contradictions is the conflict between inclination and duty, between the life which must die and the life which cannot die. And, under the stress of this divided and distracted condition, I must and will put it to the proof, the personal proof. Perhaps there is for me a Father in heaven ; a Father whom to know is to solve a problem ; a Father who will perhaps explain Himself one day, but whom, if He never explains Himself, I shall seek and I shall serve and I shall love still. We come back to the text, and to a few brief lessons for ourselves from the actions of the characters before us. In an age and season of perpetual unrest, how refreshing to our spirits to have before us some example, albeit in the remote past, of a judge who could dwell under the palm tree between Ramah and Bethel, and to whom the children of Israel 92 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES could go up for judgment Were it only a picture in con- trast and contrariety to a possible present, I would not tantalize you by exhibiting it. Who does not yearn and pant for rest — for a pause at least — an interlude of quiet- ness } Who does not complain, whose countenance does not bear the mark either of excitement or else of fatigue } The age in which our lot is cast has determined not to waive its activities ; the man who can crowd the greatest number of engagements into one day is, with us, the dili- gent and industrious man. Every office, every dignity up to the very highest, is measured and judged by the scale of hours given to business, by the multitude and the multi- fariousness of its separate things done. Brethren, it is an unfair and unrighteous judgment. Nothing is easier than to live a life all in sight and all in evidence. The difficult thing is to live any other : to have no solitude and no privacy suits that spiritual indolence, at all events, which is in all of us by nature. If, in addition to incurring no blame, we can often get praise for a life lived all in sight of the sun, this redeems the conscience from its sense of one relation, the highest and holiest of all, being left un- fulfilled and unrealized, adding that pleasantest sensation of all, the being compassioned for neglect of duty, till at last the man loses the very power of repose, of so much as the enjoying a holiday, and the whole being becomes that external, that superficial, thing which has no yesterday and no to-morrow, certainly no remembrance of any Divine Rock from which it was hewn or any Divine source to which it must eventually return. You may say indeed that the life lived under the palm tree between Bethel and Ramah must have been fearfully monotonous, utterly with- out incident, mentally as well as physically stagnant, also that it is idle to draw lessons from a state of things quite impossible now. What would a judge or a bishop be thought of in these days who should try to act on that principle.^ Few men, it may be urged, are capable of pro- fiting by leisure, even if they could find it. The practical life is at all events useful ; it lays the axe at the root of many kinds of sin. Let us admit all this, yet let us bewail for a moment the accompanying ease. If the right kind of men, and but a few of them, could be set free to think, to advise, to originate, to counsel, what a gain would ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 93 this be to a people laden with care, full of intellectual and spiritual perplexities, and feeling themselves terribly alone in a difficult and embarrassing way! For lack of this many lives go utterly astray and many minds are wrecked on the shoals and sand-banks of doubt. It might be said that the two influences of action and thought are com- monly kept distinct in the present state of things, and those that want counsel have no lack of help from an in- numerable crowd of helpers. Unhappily the thinkers are too much isolated from action, so that they run into vain and profitless speculation, having no help for this life nor hope for that which is to come. The moral of it all is : Busy men, snatch moments of reflection. Even if these are rare moments, if well used, they will fertilize, will tranquil- lize, will consecrate the long hours of toil. When you die your life will not vanish like the lives of those who neither feared God nor regarded man ; they will have left a sweet memory behind them, and they themselves will pass natu- rally into the heavenly rest which remaineth. The second thought is the true place and dignity of woman. We see it here in the positive and in the nega- tive. Deborah was a prophetess : God spake to her ; she saw within and beneath the appearance of things. That is a prophet. She did not allow the visible to crush out the invisible. She was not appalled by the nine hundred chariots of iron : she did not feel that King Jabin and his great general were invincible because for twenty years they mightily oppressed the children of Israel. She saw through these, and knew still that there was a God in Israel who rules in the kingdom of man, and who, though He tarries long and sometimes sets up over nations the basest of rulers, can yet be called on by prayer, and in the long run will make it to be well with the righteous. Deborah was a prophetess, and the spirit which I have tried to describe is the spirit of prophecy. Having it, she was, as a matter of course, an influence in her generation. Men who sought her for judgment doubtless went away the better for having seen her. In a great emergency she obtained that influence. She called Barak to her, set him his task, assured him of his commission, and even consented at his request to accompany him on his march. This was heroic, but it was also feminine : Deborah did not assume the 94 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES command of the army ; she was the influence, she was the inspiration, but she left the leadership and the generalship to another. Not for nothing have we the record of another woman on the same page with that of Deborah. We shrink instinctively from the false dealing and the blood- stained hand of Jael ; she has overstepped the line between the feminine and masculine — nay, between the enthusiast and the fanatic. That impassioned cry, “ Blessed above women,'’ has never found an echo, and never could have found an echo, in any evangelical heart ; that cry has given care and pain and trouble to many champions of revela- tion. We cannot receive it as the voice of God's Spirit, except in some modified and softened sense in which it hails, and justly hails, the victory, however soiled and damaged, of the alone moral theistic nation as a victory in the long run, and in a large view, of the cause of progress, the cause of development and therefore, in some sense, the cause of mankind and of the world. But the chapter teaches us that woman is to be content with that honour and dignity which God has made hers. Influence is hers, inspiration may be hers, alike to the sword of Barak and the nail and the hammer of Jael. God rarely puts into one hand both influence and power ; those who grasp at the latter usually lose the former. Influence in one sense indeed, is power, but it means the moral, social, spiritual power only. One last thought occurs, and it might seem on first hearing to conflict with the foregoing, but it is not so. Deborah says to Barak, Hath not the Lord God of Israel commanded } " and he replies to her, “ If thou wilt go with me then I will go ; but if thou wilt not go with me, then I will not go.” She rejoins yet again, ‘‘ I will surely go with thee ; notwithstanding the journey that thou takest shall not be for thine honour, for the Lord shall sell Sisera into the hand of a woman.” We are not concerned with the last phrase, The Lord shall sell Sisera into the hands of a woman.” The Scripture writers see the hand of God everywhere. They go so far as to say, “ Shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it?” That distinction, important in its place, which we make so com- monly between the ruling and overruling, was merged for Scripture writers in the one thought of the Divine empire ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 95 and omnipotence. What ! ” they ask, or seem to ask, as a pregnant question, “ Can God do anything certainly, except He do all things really?'’ Thus, if the hostile general bows and falls at the feet of a Jewish assassin, they say, ‘‘ The Lord delivered Sisera ; the Lord sold Sisera into her hand." The overruling is for them an agency. They are not afraid of any cavilling ; for them it is so. But the thought before us is differenjt. What v/as the character, the differentia of the faith of Barak, that the epistle to the Hebrews should single him out for mention ? And we find it here in the self-forgetfulness of Barak in doing God’s work. What if one woman set him on it, and another woman is to finish it? What if the journey he took was not to be for his own honour — should that 3top him ? What will the troops say if they see a woman marching by his side ; if they see him consulting her for his tactics ; if they hear him confess that she is his monitress and superior? Shall that not deter? No. It is God’s cause ; God’s honour, not his, is the thing to be aimed at. Here is faith forgetting itself in the cause of God. Brethren, it is a grand heroism ; for lack of it much good work is spoiled, and much more is left undone. It may be a matter of controversy whether a Wilberforce or a Clarkson was earlier in the field against the slave-trade. The workmen of God do not fight about these things. There is a phrase which is often used of God’s agents ; they are called '‘humble instruments.’’ Yet this same modest disclaimer asserts the instrumentality. Propose to omit the name from the subscription list, from the list of patrons, where will the humble instrument be then ? “ The journey which thou takest shall not be for thine honour ; ’’ no, for one woman suggested it, and another woman was to complete it. What then? Faith is willing to have it so, for faith is the sight of the invisible, and rests on an invisible power. He that speaketh of himself seeketh his own glory, but he that seeketh His glory that sent him is true, and no unrighteousness is in him. What shall I more say? The time would fail to tell of the faith of Barak, who took a journey not for his own honour ; who obeyed the call of a woman saying, “ Hath not God commanded ?’’ and left to another woman the last stroke of victory. 96 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES . Brethren, let us do the prescribed portion ; small and poor if it be, it is better for the like of us ; let us do the little portion set us of the world-wide and age-long work of God, and then fall asleep in the spirit of one who wrote these last words in his diary the night before he was sud- denly called home to be no more seen : “ There are works which by God’s permission I would do before the night cometh^ but, above all, let me mind my own personal work, keep myself pure and zealous and believing, labour to do God’s will, yet not anxious that it should be done by me rather than by others, if God disapproves of my doing it.” Be this our spirit in life and in death, and toil itself shall be rest ere the long rest comes ! C J. V. XIII. Ruth and Boaz. Ruth i. 22. And they came to Bethlehe 7 n in the beginning of barley hai vestP You will not expect a meagre abbreviation of the beautiful story of Ruth. It seems to me that a preacher who would attempt anything of the kind would act like one who, standing on the outskirts of a forest, and had seen the glory of the wintry sunset gleaming through the branches, should then take a few dry sticks from the trees as a speci- men of the glories he had witnessed. I assume that you know the beautiful story of the Book of Ruth, and I shall only attempt to draw some of the chief moral and spiritual lessons which appear to me to pervade it. I. In the first place it seems to me that the Book of Ruth exhibits to us an eternal law of God’s kingdom. I mean that, in the worst and darkest times of the Church, God has had His own people. We are led directly to this law by the objection which has been made to the story of the Book of Ruth, that such sweet and genuine piety is utterly inconceivable in the dark and stormy times of the Judges. But if you bear in mind the truth that the very purpose of the Book of Judges is to trace out the law of retaliation, and to show how national sin is connected with national punishment, you will see why such narratives of exceptional piety like that of Ruth should be excluded. But there is a more satisfactory answer in the fact that ever ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 97 since God had a Church on earth true spiritual religion has never been utterly extinguished. Faith can always say with the Apostle that there is a remnant according to the election of grace.’' When God’s holy dove is driven from cities and the abodes of men, that bird of sweetest note can be heard singing in remote places, even in dens and in the clefts of the rocks. And consider for one moment how this law has been exhibited from time to time in our own Church of England. It seems to me to be a great mistake to suppose that spiritual religion totally disappeared 150 years ago, until it was as if accidentally discovered by some excellent men in the suburbs of London about seventy years since. Just take two instances in the history of the Church of England. Take the reign and court of Charles II. There are many who wdll remember that wonderful picture of the last Sunday in the Church, when the gallery was filled with boys, singing lewd songs, and the king was to be seen playing with a group of dissipated companions. Yet even here the life of Mary Godolphin was hidden with Christ in God. She walked through the fire, and there was not so much as the smell of it upon her raiment. Even here she lived according to rules simple and direct, and which many would find as useful in a London suburb as they were to her. Or, again, when we come to the Georgian era, and light upon certain histories written as if in vitriolic acid. No doubt there is enough darkness about them, and we light upon clerical slanders rather than upon the souls of men being cared for, and of dioceses being superintended. Yet even at this darkest period there was one on whose face men saw a glow. Bishop Butler was sent to preside over the see of Durham, while in remote places of England there were men of the stamp of the Wesleys. The soil may be ever so rank, the spiritual atmosphere ever so unwholsome, but still the Apostle’s words remain, “ His seed abideth ” — abideth in him that is in God. Never has the Church been so dead but that the voice may be heard which said of Sardis, ‘'Thou hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments ; and they shall walk before Me in white : for they are worthy.” I\ow of this great law, the survival of holiness, we H 98 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES have a beautiful instance in the Book of Ruth. You will observe that the Bible in this respect differs from all our preconceived notions. History, it is sometimes said, is a pall covering dead men’s bones ; but at least it covers them gracefully. The king shows off gracefully in the hands of some great master of the art, so does the states- man who claims for himself a sort of Divine right of always acting with the majority. As we frame history it is all perfect and sublime. It should be a passing on of saints and martyrs with a cross on their shoulders, and a crown on their brow, to the throne of glory. But as God has framed history, how different it is ! Its every page is stained and blistered — stained with blood and blistered with tears. And of this feature in Old Testament history, the Book of Judges is an example. The Divine narrative closes with a sigh. ‘‘ In those days there was no king in Israel ; every man did that which was right in his own eyes.” Now, over against all this stands the Book of Ruth, in which the characters are drawn in simple life. An air of truthfulness and reality pervades the book. In support of this I need only remind you of the beautiful language of Naomi with regard to Ruth herself. I find a German critic saying that “ Ruth is not a marked character.” But is that a real objection } What is the true and high ideal of woman? Is she simply a thing of nerves and bones? Is it for her to wash the wounds of pain, or to minister in old age, and in daily sickness ? We entwine the memory of a woman dear to us with sickness and suffering re- lieved. Ruth embraces the true religion with her whole heart. Boaz sees that she has come to put her trust under the wings of the Lord God of Israel, not a young proselyte caught by those who wish to entrap her. She comes with her whole heart, and that heart a broken one. She is the type of the Gentile Church, she is the firstfruits of that great multitude of all nations, and kindreds, and tribes, who have been drawn to the Cross. Then you notice another thing after Naomi has addressed her daughters-in-law ; ‘‘ Orpah kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth clav^’e unto her.” We all know how much these little gushing tokens of affection mean in sweet-mannered women. Truth, pro- ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 99 priety, affection, these are the old combined virtues that formed the character of Ruth. Then we have Boaz. There have been times when the young have needed encouragement, and it is well to en- courage those even who are growing old. The voice of a philosopher reminds us that the work of the world is done by the young, that the golden decade is between thirty and forty, that men as they grow older become lost to enthu- siasm and to faith. Now the words of Boaz have a Bible tinge, and his memory is haunted by Bible echoes. “ And, behold, Boaz came from Bethlehem, and said unto the reapers, The Lord be with you. And they answered him, The Lord bless thee.’' Think of that beautiful service in the harvest field ! It is no exaggeration to say that some one might come into Westminster Abbey, and when the last light of day is stealing in through the clerestory, when the priest says, ** The Lord be with you,” and the choir responds, “And with Thy Spirit,” you may catch the echo of words once spoken during the barley harvest of Bethlehem.” II. We may learn a lesson on the law of social life. There is throughout the book a constant reference to the Levitical law. There is the “ goel,” the redeeming kinsman. But I wish you specially to observe the beneficence of the law. I wish that some who speak of the barbarous char- acter of the old law would take their Bibles and read the 1 8 th chapter of Leviticus. You will there see that God ordained that a portion should be reserved for the poor and the stranger. The law gave a measure of wealth to the indigent. It solved in this way one of the most terrible problems of our modern society. While it did this there was an ample margin left for the exercise of private charity. The corner of the field was defined to mean a portion that in modern language would have been a poor-rate of four- pence in the pound. It was not a system of outdoor relief, for the Book of Ruth shows us that there was great delicacy to be observed in giving. There is a difference between the alms you fling and the present you give. And thus there is a moral even in children’s presents. But I think it should be observed in favour of the old Levitical law that this England never found out till the reign of Queen Eliza- beth the difference between the pauper and the vagabond. lOO EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES the difference between misfortune and crime. Depend upon it, as the spirit of the Old Testament works, the bitter taunt will become less and less true that England is a para- dise for the rich and a purgatory for the poor. III. There is an Evangelical law connecting this book of the Old Testament with Christ Jesus our Lord. Per- haps, in modern times, we have heard too much of Ruth as an idyll, and too little of it as a sacred book of the inspired canon. We have been called on to see her as she appeared to the poet Keats, too little as she appeared to St. Matthew linked in the genealogy of Jesus Christ. We cannot dis- pense with the genealogies of the New Testament. They do not consist simply of long lists of difficult names, but contain something far beyond. Over and over again, in some layer of the soil, the naturalist finds traces of animals now extinct ; yet give him one vertebra, and he will form the entire structure. So these names, which may at first appear only cold petrifactions, only want an interpreter to start them into a new life. I need not remind you that Bethlehem is connected with history and prophecy again and again. In Psalm xxxii. 6, 7, we seem to hear echoes from the old Church, singing ‘Wenite adoremus.'' Then there is that old strain again in the beginning of the Book of Micah, and you will remember it in connection with the histories of Saul and the death of Rachel. Yes, and in Bethlehem was the birth of Him who made it the most celebrated place of all except Calvary. As we hear of Bethlehem what do we think of? Of the mystery of the Virgin's womb, of that true humanity which was born there like unto us in form and feature, like us in all but sin, and by the mystery of that Holy Incarnation each one may find pardon and peace. IV. Lastly, we learn the law which pervades the life of every true believer. The Book of Ruth may be an idyll, but it is an idyll seen in a Divine light. Those two boys that had been taken from the widowed mother early — have we never seen one in middle life like Naomi, with her hair flecked with grey, and who, when she speaks, can but say, “ Call me not Naomi ; call me Mara, for the Almighty hath dealt very bitterly with me ” ? No doubt the history is given us because it is a specimen of the Divine guidance of the believer's life. We may learn that our lives are not ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. loi random things, and that there is no such thing as chance about the Christian’s life. This story of Ruth, like every story of the highest sort, would lead us to perfect trust in Him who wants His own dear children to lift up their hands to Him when in darkness. They must wrestle in the darkness before they can face the sunrise. God seems to keep silence when we pray. We ask, and God seems not to give us the things for which we pray. Ah ! but He giv^es us far better. There are some who may pray for their Mahlon and Chilion. They may have asked for the life of their children, and God answered the prayer by giving them a long life — even life for ever and ever. And some Ruth here has prayed for one dearer than life, and he has gone down in youth and beauty, and now the grass waves over him, for God has taken him. And then, as time has gone by, she has found a refuge under the eternal wings, a. home that shall not pass away. Amidst all weariness she can sing, — “ Be the day weary or be the day long, It ringeth at last to even-song.” W. A. XIV. David. 2 Sam. xii 7. Thou art the manT Each of us has but one life in this world, a life of infinite possibilities, alike for blessedness and for ruin. The stake at issue is so tremendous, that every human life, in its struggle against destiny, has in it the elements of the grandest tragedy. “ Lo, ’tis a gala night ! Amidst The lonesome later years, An angel throng, bewinged, bedight With robes, and bathed in tears, Sit in a theatre to see A play of hopes and fears, While the orchestra plays fitfully The music of the spheres.” Out of the pages of Scripture, with the exception of two poets, Dante and Shakespeare, it has rarely been given to any mortal man to indicate anything like the elements of awfulness and pathos, of beauty or of deadliness, which 102 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES may He in the story of any man. That story is scarcely ever truly told. There are but two autobiographies in the world — the Confessions of St. Augustine and the Confes- sions of Rousseau — which the world has taken as the genuine efforts of any man to exhibit himself as he really was. Biographies written by others are rarely more than a record of mere external events. It has happened to us, I dare say, sometimes to read the biography of a man whom we knew very well in life, and in doing so we may generally see that the deepest elements of the man’s life, as we knew them, have been untouched. There has been no attempt to explain the outward manifestations ; the keynote of all the discords and all the harmonies has after all been never struck. The fact that in the Scrip- tures, we have the lives of men written truthfully, and in their essence, however briefly, gives to the Bible no little of its strange power. It holds up the mirror to nature, and shows us human souls as they really were, with none of the falsities, none of the suppressions, none of the exaggerated eulogy and the tedious triviality of modern biographies. It goes to the heart of human life. It pro- nounces with sovereign finality the one decision : “ He did that which was good,” or ‘‘ he did that which was evil, in the sight of the Lord.” We may mention three men in particular, of whom full and detailed records are given to us. Each of them marked a great epoch : each of them was a representative man : they were Moses, David, and St. Paul. We may be sure that there were deep reasons why these men should have been set apart, to occupy, with their story and with their writings, so large a space in the Holy Book. We will glance at some of the facts in the life of one of them, — David. Perhaps it may throw light on some truths respect- ing sin, and penitence, and pardon. We see the son of Jesse, first, a beautiful, innocent, noble boy, with boundless capabilities for a holy and happy life. A thousand such have been born into the world, with bodies of perfect health and symmetry, with minds of quick intelligence, with spirits capable of being attuned to the sweetest melodies of heaven. Thousands of boys have been born into this world, for whom the design of God — until they themselves, aided by the fraud and subtlety of the ON THE OLD TESTAMENT 103 devil, or man, have fatally marred it — was, that they should grow in wisdom, and stature, and in favour with God and man ; that they should prove a blessing to them- selves, and to the world into which they have been born ; that their path should be as the path of the just, as a shining light that shineth more and more unto the perfect day. Moses, the goodly child drawn from the reeds of the river, was such a boy. Joseph, pure in the furnace of trial, was such a boy. Samuel, called in the night-watches, before the light of the Temple had yet gone out, was such a boy. Daniel, simple, temperate, holy, in the midst of a cruel and corrupt court, was such a boy. John the Baptist, the stern, strong prophet of the wilderness, was such a boy. St. Benedict, and St. Francis, and St. Bernard were such boys. And these, and many others, have grown up into brave and godly men, in city or in wilderness, in prison or on the throne ; through evil report or good report, they have held fast, even to the end, the purity and the glory of the human life which God had given them. We ask of one who has shown such early promise, — “ And has that early hope been crowned with truth ? Has he fulfilled the promise of his youth ? And borne untainted, through the world’s wide field, Virtue’s white wreath, and Honour’s stainless shield?” Yes, sometimes he has. None of these, indeed, — not Moses, or Joseph, or David, or St. Bernard, or St. Benedict, or any one of them, — was perfect : the world has seen but one sinless boy, and one sinless man — the Lord Jesus Christ. And so far is sinlessness from ensuring that earthly pros- perity, of which most men think most of all, and for which they spend their strength, and even sell their souls, in vain, that the one life of perfect holiness which alone the world has seen, ended amid taunts, and gibes, and howls of exe- cration, from priest, and Pharisee, and mob, upon the bitter cross. Men usually fix upon the outer facts of life as being of its essence. Ah ! let us learn the value of this estimate. ‘‘Tis not the whole of life to live, Nor all of death to die.” Every life, the good as well as the bad, has its necessary martyrdom : the only important thing is, how the martyr- 104 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES dom was caused. There are God’s martyrs, content in the very fire, to whom the heavens open amid all their toil and anguish from a sinful and unregenerate world. There are the devil’s martyrs, who, swallowing his gilded bait, are rent by his lacerating hook, and whom he lays contemptuously on the ground to gasp and die. There are those who die by their self-inflicted martyrdoni, the souls who sell themselves, the multitudes who commit moral suicide by the edge or the poison of the passions, which, instead of mastering, they encourage. There are the martyrdoms of healing retribution, those whom God makes sick with smiting, but only that they may repent, and who, even in the drowning waters, seize hold of His saving hand. It is to this last class that David belongs. He fell grievously, and he was chastised, because he was a son. He sinned, and he suffered. He was saved, indeed, but it was so as by fire. We see him, first, a happy boy amid his sheep-folds, in the glow of health, the dew on his gracious golden hair, the fresh wind of the wilderness in his ruddy cheek, as he faithfully performs his narrow duties, and, with the dauntlessness of a pure heart, slays the lion and the bear. And as he thus fed his flock like a shepherd, afar from cities, their strife, their squalor, their temptations, desiring nothing but the yellow dates from the palm-tree and the water from the brook, he felt and sang : “ The Lord is my Shepherd ; I shall not want. He maketh me to lie down in green pastures ; He leadeth me beside the still waters. He restoreth my soul ; He leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for His name’s sake.” Happy, perhaps, for David, had he never changed that way of life in those blessed and simple years ! In those days his thoughts were pleasant as roses, and pure as the dew upon their leaves. “ Love had he found in huts where poor men lie. His daily teachers had been woods and rills. The silence that is in the starry sky, The sleep that is among the lonely hills.’' But man does not choose his own destiny. The small, sweet idyll ended. One day the boy is summoned from his sheep in the wilderness to his father’s house. There he finds that the grey-haired prophet of his race has come ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 105 to the family sacrifice. All his stalwart brothers pass before the seer, but, bold as they are, and like the children of a king, Samuel, who is no longer to be deceived by tallness of stature, feels that the Lord has not chosen these, and pours the fragrant oil of consecration on the head of the boy who was despised by his brethren. Another day he is summoned to the tent where the mighty Saul is sitting in moody madness, troubled by an evil spirit from the Lord, and nothing but the sweet notes of the boy’s harp can dispel that agonizing gloom. Another day makes him spring into the hero and the darling of his nation. He visits his brethren in the camp ; and, strong in the strength of the Lord, — because his heart is pure alone of the house of Israel, — with no other weapon but his sling and the smooth stones of the brook, he slays the giant champion, and puts to flight the armies of the Philistines. From that day forth, the innocent shepherd-life is over. He is a warrior ; he bears the armour of the king ; he is sent on perilous enterprises ; he sits at the king’s table ; he marries the king’s daughter ; the king’s son loves him as his own soul, with a love passing the love of women ; the maidens of Israel, with timbrels and dances, extol his fame and his prowess, even above that of the warrior Saul. But, while the youths of Israel, doubtless, envied his glory, he found, even thus early, how rare it is in life that there is a line of light in the life of any man, without many a line of dark- ness to intercept and close it in. Saul eyes him with a deep smouldering malice, which bursts every now and then into fits of murderous fury. At last he is forced to flee from this hated and imperilled life. Then he becomes an outlaw, the head of a band of men, who, but for his strong influence, might have been lawless freebooters. He is mixed up of necessity with war and raids and forays. His hand is stained with blood ; but, in spite of all, he still holds fast to the law of his God. He controls his followers ; he restrains his passions ; he bears his trials with heroic cheerfulness ; he works for honourable ends ; he takes no revenge. Loyal to the last, he spares again and again the life of his unrelenting foe. Gallant and chivalrous, in the robber’s den as in the king’s palace, he still does not forget the God of his youth, nor forsake the covenant of his God* And so, at last, he too becomes a king. God says to io6 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES him : “ Thou shalt be the shepherd of My people Israel.’* From the sheepfold, from following the ewes great with young ones, God took him that he might feed Jacob, His people, and Israel, His inheritance. And here, too, he is not at first found wanting. He shows himself a brave, a faithful, a magnanimous king. He still shows, in his lofty place, the wisdom which adversity had bred. What our Alfred was, as a civilizer and a law-giver, what Edward HI. was, as a statesman and a soldier, what gallant Henry V. was, as a favourite of the people after the glory of Agincourt, that David became to the united tribes of Israel and Judah in the zenith of their glory. Here, then he stood at last on the summit of human wishes. The despised youngest-born of his family, the rude shepherd- boy of Bethlehem, has become a hero, and a hero-king. And the king conquers all his enemies round about, and builds his palace, and brings the Ark to Mount Zion, and raises as his capital the city of Jerusalem, to be famous thenceforth for ever. There is no need to dwell on the story of David’s shame- ful fall. You all know it. He was sitting on his palace roof That cool place of retirement had often been hallowed by the melodies of his better thoughts. From thence, as he watched the birds streaming towards the sunset, with their golden feathers and silver wings, he had sung : ‘‘ Oh, that I had the wings of a dove, for then would I flee away, and be at rest ! ” There, as he gazed on the starry midnight, he had broken forth in the immortal Psalm : “ The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament showeth His handiwork.” Far different was his mood in this evil hour. He was secure and full-fed ; and his thoughts were base, and sensual, and vile. Doubtless, the prayers which might have saved him had been for- gotten, or but carelessly uttered. Doubtless, his service in the house of God had become but one of dead orthodoxy and self-satisfied form, no better than the hawk’s shriek, or the lake’s murmur in the summer eve. But that was why evil thoughts and impure desires had entered into the temple of his heart. Satan wakes, though man sleeps, and, seizing the opportunity given him by the undefended soul, Satan flung upon it a fiery arrow, which should rankle and agonize until the end. The sin of David ; the root of it in ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 107 unguarded passions and careless hours ; the awful warning which it involves ; the necessity of the girded loins and the burning lantern ; the illustration of the way in which one sin paves the road for a multitude of other sins which are worse than the first ; the glimpse that it gives us into the bottomless abyss which the sinful soul cleaves before its own wandering feet : all this is full of instruction, but it is not our subject. We have now to glance for a moment rather at the consequences of the sin, at the remorse which followed, at the pardon by which it was at last healed. It is, as you know, the awful property of a great sin to open the eyes. The man who has never before suspected the depths of his own vileness^ sees, as under the lurid glare of a lightning flash, what he is, what he has been, how low he has sunk, to what awful, inevitable retribution he has laid himself bare ; but this does not always happen at once. David s eyes were not opened by his guilt and treachery. Rather, they were sealed in penal blindness. He did not feel those stains of infamy which ought to have burned into his conscience like flakes of fire. Conse- quences waited, the punishment was delayed, the doom was pronounced, but the execution was deferred. Bath- sheba was in his house ; Uriah lay dead under the walls of Rabbah, basely deserted, treacherously murdered, by the king for whom his brave sword had been drawn. David, the man whom God had chosen, was a murderer and an adulterer, a vulgar Eastern despot stained with lust and blood ; yet his guilty soul did not awake from this strange, drugged sleep. Everything was going on as be- fore. No lightning flashed, no thunder rolled, no earth- quake rocked the ground at Jerusalem. All men still bowed before the king, and as he stood in the Temple service, among the white-robed Levites, and amid the sounding of the silver trumpets, he did not remember that he had forfeited the clean heart and the free spirit; that he was no longer what he had been ; that he was worthy no longer of standing among God’s chosen ones, and that he, the king of the chosen people, was a vile and guilty man. Not only did awakenment not come to David instantly ; it did not even come gradually. God left him to see if conscience would awaken, and it did not awaken ; and it io8 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES was only when the king was living on in contented crime, guilty and impenitent, that God sent Nathan to him, to tell him that parable of the ewe lamb. It kindled in David a flash of his old nobleness ; and, when he had in- dignantly condemned, out of his own mouth, his own far more heinous iniquity, then, with a terrible voice of most just judgment, with stern face and pointed finger, the seer broke out with his passionate message : “ Thou art the man ! Then, indeed, David saw it all. The scales dropped from his eyes. He saw what he was, and what he had done. God had convicted him. He made no excuses. He stood abashed and confounded before men, before God, before his own conscience, an ashamed, self-condemned, and miserable man. Deep, earnest, sincere, intense, ago- nizing was his repentance. You read the records of it in his seven penitential psalms ; you hear it most of all in the sobbing of the broken heart in the 51st Psalm. And because he repented from his heart, abhorred himself, abhorred his sin, amended his ways, therefore God forgave him. He gave him back the clean heart and the free spirit. He took not wholly His Holy Spirit from him. Yes ; but remark that, at the same time, God taught him, and through him taught us, and taught the world, that remission of sins is no condonation of sin’s earthly consequences. It is against the ordinances of Providence, it is against the interests of men,’' said a well-known statesman, that im- mediate reparation should be possible when long evils have been at work ; and one of the greatest safeguards against misdoing would be removed, if at any moment the con- sequences of misdoing could be repaired.” If David had given occasion to the enemies of God to blaspheme, he has also given occasion to take awful warning, for God did not spare him. It availed him nothing that he was a poet, a warrior, a king of the chosen nation, the builder of Jeru- salem. It availed him nothing that he had been the innocent shepherd-boy, the gallant chief, the national de- liverer ; nothing, that the maidens of Israel had sung his praises, and the priests of Israel chanted his holy songs. God suffered the consequences of his sin to uprush over his head in deluge. The freight of his bark of life, his peace, his fortune, his crown, and his happiness, went by ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 109 the board with one deadly crash, amidst a chaos of waves and storms. From that day the sword never departed from his house. From that hour dark spirits haunted his pillow, and unclean wings flapped about his roof. His sons, beautiful and bad, had not seen him restrain his pas- sions, and they did not restrain theirs. He had wounded others in their tenderest affections, and he was wounded in his own. He had humiliated a woman, and his own daughter was humiliated. He had taken the wife of another in secret, and /its wives were taken from him openly, and in the sun. As he sinned, in like manner he suffered. There was a frightful likeness between the iniquity and its consequences. He had slain Uriah by treachery, and by treachery his own son was murdered. He had lifted his heel against his friend, and his own friend lifted the heel against him. He had brutally invaded the sanctities of a home, and the sanctities of his own home were brutally laid waste. He was in the power of the rough general who knew his guilty secret Shimei openly cursed him, and flung dust at him. His favourite — his darling Absalom — revolted against him, and drove him away, weeping all day long, up the slopes of Olivet. And from the heart thus sorely wounded, from the affections thus terribly devastated, from the dignity thus vilely trampled into the dust, at last, when the rebel, and the darling of his soul, was slain, in defiance of his orders, in contempt of his agonized entreaties, there was wrung at last from him the exceeding great and bitter cry, as he went up to his chamber over the gate, and wept, and as he went he cried, “ O my son Absalom ! My son, my son Absalom ! would God I had died for thee. O Absalom, my son, my son ! ” So did the sun of David’s house set into obscure dark- ness ; and so, while it was yet day, it sank slowly down into seas of blood. Surely his life and fate may teach us at least these, among many lessons : one is, that, though we repent, we must not expect the physical, the natural, the earthly consequences of God’s broken laws to be done away. Even for David it was not so. His sun never shone again. No more peace ; no more victories ; no more glory ; no more maidens’ songs ; no more sweet, peaceful home for him ; “ no poppy, nor mandragora, nor no EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES all the drowsy syrups of the world/* could bring him back the sweet sleep which he had owned before. Henceforth the poet, the hero, the king, is a broken man. Another of his sons, his much-loved Adonijah, revolts from him ; and then the miserable scene ends in the resignation of his throne, and the chilling of his blood. Old and unregretted, he shivers miserably into his grave, and with scarce so much as the cry, “The king is dead ! ** rises the glad shout for another, “ Long live the king ! ** But it is yet a sadder thing to see that neither do the moral, the spiritual consequences of a great sin end with itself. A man may rise after his fall, but he rises as a cripple. Henceforth we read of David scarcely anything but dubious acts. There is the strange treatment of Me- phibosheth, the son of Jonathan, who had loved him with such heroic love. There is the vindictive behest to Solo- mon about his general Joab. There is the shockingly mean command to bring to the grave the hoar hairs of Shimei, whom he so ostentatiously pardoned. There is the horrid story of the sacrifice of seven of Saul’s sons, and among them the youths, over whom Rizpah, the daughter of Aiah, watched, as they lay dead in the dim and lion-haunted ways. One would think it was some mean Arab sheik bequeathing his blood-feuds to an avenger, and not the sweet Psalmist of Israel. Morally, as well as in all other things, David, though repentant, though forgiven, yet shaken and weakened by his fall, became the wreck of his former self. Then, lastly, notice the falling of all beauty into dark- ness, and of all glory into dust. Notice that all human beauty, valour, wit, genius, success, glory, are vanity of vanities ; that man is nothing, and that God is all. Great David died as the fool dieth. So died the glorious young Greek Alexander, who conquered the world. So died the wise Henry II., cursing his rebellious sons. So died our gallant Plantagenet, the hero of Cre^y and Poictiers, “ mighty victor, mighty lord.” Low on his funeral couch he lies — no pitying hand, no tear to grace his obsequies. So died the last great conqueror of modern days, Napo- leon, on a petty island, squabbling with a poor English sailor about etiquette and about champagne. Man is as great as he is in God’s sight, and he is no greater. ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. Ill Have, then, these truths no lessons for us ? If David reaped as he had sown, shall not you reap as you have sown ? Shall not you, young men and young women, reap the whirlwind, if you sow the wind ? Shall you not reap misery, and anguish, and moral deterioration of heart, and deadness of spirit, and sin, springing up as dragons’ teeth in Protean forms of grief and punishment, if you sow to the world and to the flesh ? Yes ; and yet all this, and more than this, you are able to bear if you can feel, as, after all, David did feel, that in the midst of all, and in spite of all, though he walked even on earth amid the purging flames, and felt their scorching agony, he could feel, as we may feel, that, for the sake of David’s Son and David’s Lord, who died for us, he still had the blessedness of him whose iniquity is forgiven, and whose sin is covered ; that through whatever shames, and agonies, and moral failures, God would deliver his soul from hell. His darling from the power of the dog ; and that He who is Life, who rose from the dead, would not leave his soul in hell, neither would He suffer His holy one to see corruption. F. W. F. XV. The Failure of Elijah’s Faith, i Kings xix. 13. And, behold, there came a voice unto him, and said. What doest thou here, Elijah ? ” It has been more than once observed that some of the men who, as we say, most distinctly leave a mark upon their age are liable to great changes of spirits, alter- nating between buoyant enthusiasm and something like despair. At first sight it seems as if the resources of human nature are after all very limited : that which is expended in one quarter must be withdrawn from another. The waves which raise their crests so proudly above the accustomed level of the ocean imply, as we know, each one of them, a corresponding interval of depression. As the Psalmist says in his bold hyperbole, “as high as the heavens, and down to the valleys beneath,” of the rude experience of his countrymen in the Phcenician waters, so it is often with the life of men, and especially of public men. The great effort which rivets the attention, which perhaps gives an impression of extraordinary strength or II2 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES capacity, is often dearly purchased by succeeding hours of depression and weakness. Something of this kind was the case with the late Bishop Wilberforce. The buoyant spirits, the generous enthusiasm, which made him what he was in the pulpit, in the senate, at the public meeting, was dearly paid for by periods of great despondency, when all things seemed dark, when nothing seemed possible, when he was perhaps less equal to the demands of duty than very inferior men. I. From this characteristic of enthusiastic natures the mighty prophet who is before us was not by any means exempt. So great was Elijah’s power both over men and over nature that in after ages his countrymen came to regard him as an altogether preterhuman personage, whose con- duct was not a precedent for, or a sample of, that of ordinary men. In later times this idea of Elijah was enhanced by Malachi’s prophecy about his expected coming before “ the great and terrible day of the Lord.” So that when John the Baptist appeared it was a com- mon opinion in Palestine that “ this was Elias which was for to come.” When, then, St. James quotes Elijah as an example of the efficacy of prayer, he prefaces his argument by what might seem to us before consideration a very ob- vious and trite remark, but a remark which was by no means unheeded by St. James’s first readers. He says that ‘‘ Elias was a man of like passions as we are ; ” Elijah, he means, had his share of impulse and of weakness ; and therefore the power of his prayers is an encouragement for others than himself. Now, that Elijah was what St. James thus said of him, is plain. At Carmel he was at the height of his moral ascendency, of his supernatural force. True, since his first message from God to Ahab he had been a fugitive, he had been fed by the ravens in the torrent brook of the Cherith ; he had been dependent on the charity of the devout widow in the heathen town of Zarephath. But no sooner does he return to the soil of Israel than he asserts his astonishing power over all who come in contact with him ; for he, too, in his measure, had a share in that pro- mise to the King Messiah, “ Be Thou Ruler in the midst, even among thine enemies.” Obadiah, Ahab’s trusted min- ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 113 ister, falls awe-struck before him ; Ahab himself, who has spared no pains to compass his death, acts as a man might act under a resistless spell, and submissively, though with evident reluctance, carries out his orders ; at his bidding the eight hundred and fifty prophets of the newly imported nature-worship of the Phoenicians are marshalled upon Carmel, and he confronts them in his solitary weakness, in his solitary strength. And then follows the appeal to the people to choose between Baal and the one true God, the challenge to the prophets of Baal, their long but fruitless pleadings pro- longed from the early morning till the evening sacrifice that Baal would somehow own their offering, — pleadings accompanied by frantic self-mutilation, and redoubled as they listen to the prophet’s terrible irony ; and then, after their final failure, Elijah’s measured preparations in accord- ance v/ith the forgotten principles of the ancient ritual, his solemn invocation of the God of Israel, the fire from heaven, the adoring confession of the awe-struck people, “ The Lord He is the God, the Lord He is the God,” and the terrible extermination of the idolators. Taken altogether, there is no other scene like it in the Bible. Elijah on Carmel represents a man’s moral ascen- dency over his brother man in the name and for the glory of a religious truth carried to its very highest point of effective power. And now the scene has changed. Elijah is not on Carmel, but on Horeb. The idolatrous priesthood was indeed exterminated ; but Jezebel remained. She had her projects and her means of vengeance, and the prophet who had triumphed when confronted by the king, by the court, by the people, by the whole hierarchy of the false religion, must escape if he would save his life from the implacable fanaticism of the queen. He first fled to Beer- sheba, far away to the south, beyond the frontiers of Israel, a town indeed of Judah, but on the very confines of the wilderness beyond. He left the boy who waited on him, in the town, veiling as we all of us do, his moments of extreme depression even from those who knew him best, and then he wandered out despairingly into the desert, and prayed that he might die. And here he was braced for his journey by food which T EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES 114 was brought him by no human hands — a type, as it was always thought by the Christian Church of the early ages, of that strengthening and refreshing of the soul by the body and blood of Christ which enables the Christian pilgrim to cross life’s long desert on his way to his true home. Still in deep depression, after a journey of forty days, Elijah reached the sacred mountain, the scene, the very scene, of the great rev^elation to Moses. Its hallowed associations, its dreary and awful solitudes, were in keep- ing with the prophet’s thoughts. He entered into a cave, a grotto which was associated, it is likely, by the local tradition with the name and with the work of Moses ; and he gave himself up to the thoughts which crowded so darkly on his mind. Why had he suc- ceeded so well only that success should issue, as it seemed, after all in failure ? Why had such strength as had been vouchsafed him been followed by such weakness } Was not everything forfeited for which he had struggled t Was not his ministry closing in discomfiture and in shame, while the insolent and idolatrous queen and her weak and wicked husband were completing the ruin of the religion of Israel } What was the use of attempting anything further ? All was really lost ; and those who, like himself, had given their all to the losing cause, had only to bury what might remain of life in sadness and obscurity. These, or such as these, were his thoughts, when solemnly, and once and again, the searching question came to him, “ What doest thou here, Elijah ? ” II. Observe here how God discovers himself to Elijah. The Word of the Lord came to him, and He said unto him. What doest thou here, Elijah ? ” The Word of the Lord that Word which was lodged in Elijah, that Word of which he was the instrument, the organ, and which he had proclaimed so vividly, so terribly to others, now turned its voice, I had almost dared to say its eye, in upon himself. This Word or message which the prophet bears is, we thus see, not his servant, but his master. It is not a work of his own mind which he may control, or manipulate, or silence at pleasure. It is a truth which, if it be in him, is yet utterly independent of him, and to which he himself owes an obedience no less than does the very humblest of his hearers. ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 115 The prophet of old, the minister of Jesus Christ at the present day, is always the servant of the truth which he proclaims ; and he carries it for his own “ reproof, correc- tion, instruction in righteousness,’' no less than for that of his people. To the question, “What doest thou here?” Elijah could not but reply. It was — so it seemed to the prophet — it was for his zeal for the cause of God ; it was his tragic despair, it was his isolation, it was his sense, his crushing sense, of impotence and of failure which had brought him thus to Horeb. “ I have been very jealous,” he said, “for the Lord God of Hosts; for the children of Israel have forsaken Thy covenant, thrown down Thine altars, and slain Thy prophets with the sword ; and I, even I only, am left ; and they seek my life, to take it away.” And this answer is neither accepted nor rejected. It is passed by most significantly without a word of re- proval or of rebuke. If the prophet would know more about God, about him- self, he must come forth from the cave, he must stand face to face on the mountain side with the Infinite. And then, as centuries before, on this very spot with Moses, the Lord passed by.” The Author of nature, who is also the Lord of con- science, often speaks to conscience through the changing aspects of nature ; and thus nature is a book written in characters which those who live in communion with God know how to read. For them the wind, the earthquake, the lightning, are not merely physical phenomena, forces or effects of which they can or cannot, as the case may be, furnish themselves with an adequate scientific account, they are outward signs of invisible realities that belong to the human and to the moral world. Nature is a robe of beauty, distinct, indeed, from the Creator Himself, since it is the work of His hands, but luminous with the revelations of His mind and of His will. What was “ the great and strong wind that rent the moun- tains, and brake in pieces the rocks before the Lord ” but a natural figure of the tempestuous impulse which had carried the prophet onward ever since he left in his early youth his native hills of Gilead ? What was the earth- quake with its deep warning mutlerings, with its violent shocks of upheaval and of ruin crashing through the wild Ii6 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES valleys around him, but an image of convulsions of which Elijah's own soul, and many another soul around, had been the scene ? What was the lightning playing incessantly around the prophet on the mountain side but a reflection of the heaven-sent burning zeal which had been from the first the spirit of his work and of his life ? And yet as the wind, and the earthquake, and the fire succeeded each other, the prophet felt that they no longer meant for him what they would have meant as he stood of old on Carmel. They were signs of states of mind which once seemed instinct with the life of God, but which now, for the first time, he knew to be without it. ‘‘The Lord was not in the wind." Strong religious impulse may be more than half physical, a matter of temperament, a matter of constitution. Earthly passions in some natures may take this precise form ; the language, the intended, the professed objec|s may be of heaven, the spirit of earth. Even though mountains of opposition are rent by it, even though rocks of prejudice are broken in pieces by it, and changes brought about which fill the thoughts of men, and which live in the pages of history, yet it may be that the agency which effects all this is in itself destitute of any- thing that is properly Divine, that “ the Lord is not in the wind." “ And the Lord was not in the earthquake." Spasmodic terror may be only terror ; the thought, or sight, or imme- diate apprehension of death may convulse, does convulse to. its very depths the human soul. But mere mental agitation may be only desperate. “ The fear of the Lord," as dis- tinct from the fear of anything else, “is the beginning of wisdom." Whether the Lord is or is not in these great earthquakes of the soul depends, generally speaking, upon the soul's previous relations with Him. “And the Lord was not in the fire." He had been in the burning bush ; He was, in after ages, in the fiery tongues at Pentecost. He was not in the fire which played around Elijah on Horeb. Religious passion carried to the highest point of enthusiasm is a great agency in human life ; but religious passion may easily be too inconsiderate, too truculent, too entirely wanting in tenderness and in charity to be in any sense Divire. Christendom has been the scene of the most Divine enthusiasm of which the soul of ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 117 man has ever had experience in the whole course of its history. But Christendom has also been ablaze again and again with fires ; and those fires are not extinct in our own day and country of which it may certainly be said that the Lord is not in them. “And after the fire, a still small voice.*' In physical impulse, in convulsive terror, in the white heat of emotion, dealing with sacred things, we may seek for God in vain. But when conscience speaks clearly we may be sure of His presence. Conscience is His inward messenger, and in its quiet whisper we listen to an echo from the Infinite and the Unseen. We may, alas ! play tricks with it ; we may drug it, we may corrupt it in many ways, we may eventu- ally silence it. But if we will let it alone, if we will reverence it, if we will listen to it, it places us surely in the presence of God. “After the fire, a still small voice.” Conscience then repeated the question, “ What doest thou here, Elijah ? ” and the question implied beyond all doubt that Elijah had better have been elsewhere, and that the state of mind which had brought him to Horeb was not altogether right or healthy, Elijah was still in deep gloom ; he had yielded to it, and now he heard within him the voice of reproach : “ What doest thou here, Elijah ? ” HI. Now let us observe the character of Elijah's de- spondency. Its motive beyond all question was unselfish and noble. It is true that he does complain, “ They seek my life, to take it away” ; but he is here only thinking of himself as the representative of a great cause, and he is not speaking in his private or personal capacity. As a man he would, if it might be, gladly die : “ Now, O Lord, take away my life ; for I am not better than my fathers.” So he had prayed in the wilderness of Beersheba. But as a prophet he desired to live — to live for the sake of the truth which he had at heart. He felt that the sword which would strike him was really aimed at that which for the moment he repre- sented. The forsaken covenants, the ruined altars, the slaughtered prophets — these filled his mind and heart ; these explained why it was that he was so far from the frontiers of Israel, and a fugitive in the mountain sanctuary of Horeb. Such a despondency as this is surely a much better ii8 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES thing than a jaunty light-heartedness, which is at the bottom based on a selfish indifference to all the greatest and most precious things in human life. It augurs ill for a State when its citizens are satisfied with their individual prosperity, and have no eye or care for the public weal. It augurs ill for a Church when its members talk of a personal religion, as if there was no thought, no care, no prayer, due to the great society of Christians united to our Lord and Saviour — to what St. Paul calls “the body of Christ" Prophecy has a stern word for those who are “not grieved at the afflictions of Jacob"; and history condemns unsparingly the royal sybarite who calculated that the world would last his time, and who then added, “ After me, the deluge." The motive of Elijah’s despondency was noble ; but, in itself, his despondency was wrong. He might have remembered that what passes for the moment on earth is no measure of what is determined in heaven ; he might have reflected that, while duties are ours, events are in the hands of God ; he might have associated himself with those lines, already ancient, of David, written, as we now know with little less than certainty, when the first mutterings of Absalom’s rebellion were being heard, and when the faint-hearted men around him counselled flight from his difficulties : “ In the Lord put I my trust : how say ye, then, to my soul, that she should flee as a bird unto the hill ? For, lo, the ungodly bend their bow, and make ready arrows within the quiver, that they may privily shoot at him who is true of heart ; for the foundations will be cast down, and what hath the righteous done } The Lord is in His holy temple, the Lord’s seat is in heaven." Had this been in Elijah’s mind he would still have been some- where near Jezreel. As it was, he had failed for the moment, great prophet as he was, to set God’s will so clearly before him as to keep close to the work that was given him to do. For the moment, even Elijah had done what we all are tempted from time to time to do. He had set aside the claim of duty in favour — mark this well — in favour of the indulgence of sentiment. And because this sentiment was strictly religious sentiment, gathering round a great and an ancient sanctuary, he had disguised from himself that he had erred and strayed so far from the ways ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 119 of God ; and therefore when the question flashed upon his conscience it was like the lightning on the path of some benighted wanderer among the precipices, “ What doest thou here, Elijah ? “What doest thou here?’* Elijah, we have seen, had his own account to give of his being where he was. But behind his excuses, as they died away into space, behind them was the voice of duty. “And the Lord said unto him. Go, return on thy way to the wilderness of Damascus : and when thou comest, anoint Hazael to be king over Syria: and Jehu the son of Nimshi shalt thou anoint to be king over Israel : and Elisha the son of Shaphat of Abel-meholah shalt thou anoint to be prophet in thy room.” IV. Now these directions, whispered by “ the still small voice” to the conscience of Elijah, involved two principles. First, Elijah was not to dwell on the abstract aspects of evil ; he was to address himself to the practical duties that lay around his path. Evil in its vast, massive accumula- tions, evil in its widespread, its ancient empire, evil in the strong and subtle ascendency which from time to time it acquires among men, is indeed beyond us. We, in our separate weakness, cannot banish it from the world. We lose precious time if we try to weigh and to measure it. Our first wisdom is to pray to be delivered from it. There it is, a fact, a vast and terrible fact, permitted for reasons which we guess at rather than decipher. If the children of Israel had broken the covenant, if they had destroyed the altars, if they had slain the Lord’s pro- phets with the sword, this was indeed a passed fact, a permitted fact, and so far it was beyond the control of Elijah. We only weaken ourselves by dwelling upon mis- chiefs which we cannot hope to remedy. We have only a certain amount of thought, of feeling, of resolve, each one of us, to dispose of. And when this has been expended unavailingly on the abstract, on the untangible, it is ex- pended ; it is no longer ours, and we cannot employ it when and where we need it close at home. And, secondly, Elijah was to begin his work with in- dividuals ; he was to deal with men one by one. “ Anoint Hazael, the heathen monarch, who, yet heathen though he be, has a place in the Divine government of the world. 120 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES That duty lies furthest on the frontier of thy work. Anoint Jehu the son of Nimshi; he will execute the impending judgments on the apostate king of Israel. That piece of work lies closer to thy appointed sphere of labour. Above all provide for the continuance of thy ministry when thou shalt have gone hence. Make Elisha the son of Shaphat prophet in thy room. That shall be thy first stern, thy most sacred and imperative, duty.’' One of the familiar fallacies of an age like ours is the notion that men can really be improved in the deepest sense of the word if they are dealt with in masses. General legislation, the vague influence of the press, or of oratory, social movements which deal with men in the block, which ignore the care and the needs of the separate soul ; these are common enough. And this fallacy is the result partly of the characteristic opportunities of the modern world, partly of the inertness which shrinks from the hard and humble work of dealing with single characters. These general measures have, no doubt, their value, sometimes their very great value, as supplementary influences ; but they are almost worthless when they are regarded as sub- stitutes for that careful indispensable labour with single souls which alone secures real changes in hearts and characters. A proclamation in general terms would have had little effect upon Israel. The anointing of Jehu, the appoint- ment of Elisha, were, as we know, to be pregnant with consequences. What doest thou here } ” To every human being in his most serious moments this question must be suggested : Why am I where I am, doing what I do, thinking what I think, saying what I say ? What is the motive which shapes, which guides my life, making me do this rather than that, making me take this turn in life rather than the other ; choosing these friends, throwing myself into these interests, into these trains of thought, into those associa- tions, into those enterprises ? ” Something, perhaps much, may be determined by antecedent circumstances ; that is to say, by the hand of God acting through accomplished events, and so far suspending or limiting personal liberty. But beyond this there is a margin in which we all are free. Even those who cannot in the least degree control ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. I2I their personal movements, since they are, for whatever reason, dependent upon others, can entirely determine where they will be, what they will be doing in the sphere of thought and of purpose. We are all of us masters, if we will, of that inner world which each man carries about within him ; and that world has its Carmel as well as its Horeb no less than the outer world around us. And the serious question for every man is whether, so far as he can judge, he is, according to his measure of strength and opportunity, endeavouring to do that portion of the will of God to which the circumstances which surround him, to which the powers and opportunities which have been given him, clearly point as meant for him and for no other man to do. What it is exactly that engages each one of us matters little, comparatively little, if the motive to be doing God's will is actively recognised. It may be the most important duties in Church or State ; it may be the daily toil of the shopboy or the domestic servant, all is equally ennobled if the great motive be there ; all is equally degraded if the great motive be absent. ‘‘ What would you do," a very good man was once asked who was playing draughts with his little son, ‘‘if you knew that you would die in five minutes } " “ I should finish this game of draughts," was the reply. Work and recreation are equally legitimate if each is treated as part of the will of God, if throughout life the awful signifi- cance of life as the great gift for which we must surely account to our Maker, which has been purchased back from ruin by the Incarnation and the death of our Divine Redeemer, be steadily kept in view. There may be very good reasons for spending portions of it on Horeb as well as upon Carmel. But the essential point is that we should be where we are, that we should be doing what we do, because, so far as we know. He who has given us the gift of life wills this, wills nothing else respecting us. H. P. L. XVI. Elijah's Flight, i Kings xix. This event in the life of Elijah is one that took place a great while ago; and the circumstances in which it hap- pened may seem very unlike our own ; and Elijah himself. 122 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES to whom it happened, was so different from ourselves, and so far above us that, all things considered, little instruction may be expected to be derivable from this or any other part of his history. The only feeling he is fitted to excite may seem to be wonder. When we come upon him in the pages of the Bible it is like coming upon a skeleton of superhuman size, or upon a gigantic suit of armour — we can only express astonishment at the greatness and the strength of men of former times. Well, if this were the only feeling which this history raised, it might not be amiss to entertain it for a time in our minds. The feeling of wonder at the greatness of others is a very wholesome feeling, and is closely connected with another, equally salutary, — the feeling of sadness at our own littleness. Yet the greatness of this prophet need not be any obstacle in the way of our deriving benefit from his history. * Rather, it should be helpful to us. For, just as if we were examin- ing the joints and mechanisms and the adaptations of the human body, the body of a giant would present them to us in their fullest and most visible form, so in a very great mind we shall be able to see most clearly the movements of mind, its strength and joy, as well as its weakness and despondency. The only part of the prophet’s history which can be touched upon is his flight to Sinai, and only a few of the more obvious points in that which have a practical bearing. I. We may notice the circumstances of the time in which Elijah was placed. These circumstances were full of in- terest. So far as things then could resemble things now, the state of parties at that time was not unlike the state of parties at present. There had always been in Israel an idolatrous, disbelieving party. The history throughout its whole length shows a polluted stream of idolatrous worship running side by side with the true worship of Jehovah; and sometimes this idolatrous current became so broad that it gave its own colour to the whole stream of the people’s religious life. They were idolaters in Ur of the Chaldees — “Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old times, even Terah, the father of Abra- ham : and they served other gods.” They were idolaters in Egypt. In the wilderness their ON THE OLD TESTAMENT, 123 idolatry broke out when ‘‘ they joined themselves unto Baal-Peor, and ate the sacrifices of the dead.” They were idolaters in Canaan. Even David’s wife, the daughter of Saul, possessed idols, with one of which she deceived the hired assassins of her father, and saved her husband’s life. The idolatrous elements were numerous, and pervaded every class in the nation, and only awaited some hand skilful and strong enough to combine them, in order to acquire the command of the people’s thoughts, and assume the place of the established faith. This was found in Jezebel, daughter of the king of Sidon, and her feeble ^husband Ahab. The latter appears to have been not so much vicious as weak — one who, like a spoilt child when refused his wishes, fell sick and would not eat. And thus he fell completely under the guidance of his unscrupulous wife. At her instigation he introduced the worship of Baal — “ He reared up an altar for Baal in the house of Baal which he had built in Samaria. And Ahab made a grove ; and Ahab did more to provoke Jehovah the God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel that were before him.” He made Baal-worship a State religion. But he went further. He was not satisfied with toleration for himself, he sought to suppress all other worship. He issued orders for the murder of Jehovah’s prophets, and the throw- ing down of His altars. And with a fatal fickleness and subserviency, the people gave in to the despotic will of the effeminate tyrant. Elijah pleaded this condition of things before the Lord in the wilderness — ‘‘ The children of Israel have forsaken Thy covenant, and thrown down Thine altars, and slain Thy prophets ; and I only am left, and they seek my life.” The country was passing through a religious crisis, and there could be seen that sifting of men which goes on at such a time. There were, as on all such occasions, three parties — the true worshippers of Jehovah, the strict idolaters, and the middlemen, who were neither. These last were, no doubt, the most numerous. Perhaps the body of the people be- longed to this class — men, as Elijah described. them, who halted or limped between two opinions ; men not firm on their legs, but limping, being neither worshippers of J ehovah, nor good idolaters. Some belonged to this class because they thought it safest to side with the majority. Some 124 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES because they could not go all the way with the extreme Jehovah-party ; yet they resented the king s high-handed proceeding, thinking it a dangerous infringement of liberty. Some because the problem presented to them was too difficult for their solution, and they were unable to decide, being drawn sometimes to one side and sometimes to another. And some belonged to this great middle party on prin- ciple, because it was a middle party. They disliked extremes. In every matter there was a great deal not essential, and men ruined their own cause by their offensive stickling for this. The worship of Jehovah was no doubt essentially the true religion, and its supporters might be excellent men ; but they were certainly narrow. If they insisted less on names, and forms, and definitions, it would be well. If they were more tolerant, and accepted the good that was in all men — might it not even be said, in all things — and the deep, religious feeling that was in their hearts, even if the form in which it showed itself externally was not always to their liking, they would make much greater way and find their usefulness much enlarged. It must be admitted that the old forms of Jehovah- worship, which suited a rude people in the wilderness, might not be adapted to the feelings of an accomplished and edu- cated nation that had enjoyed permanent empire for 600 years. Religious teaching must be accommodated somewhat to the wants and relations of the age, and it was news to them to hear that all that was to be attained of truth and goodness amongst men had already been found, and was to be had embalmed in the practices of their own particular religion. It seemed certainly possible that some other portion of mankind, even Zidon, had found something good which they had missed, and this fanatical closing up of every inlet against the thought and the belief of every portion of the race besides themselves was surely a mis- take. Such was, perhaps, like the state of parties, and the feel- ings that existed at this time. It was a time of confusion and breaking up of old beliefs. Cross currents were run- ning, and eddies, that caught men and whirled them about. The waves were so broken that the real direction of the cur- ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 125 rent was not seen. Perhaps few discerned what was really at stake. One mind at least took in the whole meaning of the issue. He was not blinded by that w'ay that men have of speaking of religion, — saying it is an inward thing, a kind of feeling, and if the feelings be right it matters little what the external object is that excites them. To him the ex- ternal object was everything : “ Choose ye this day whom ye will serve ; if Jehovah be God, follow Him ; but if Baal, then follow him.'' He knew that according to the external object, so very soon will be the feelings and the life of the worshipper. Elijah, whether of set purpose or under a sudden impulse, permitted himself on Carmel to use force. He met the king's violence with equal violence of his own. Perhaps no other course was left him ; but more likely it was a mistake. But the temptation was very great — in the full tide of excitement and with the multitude at his back. But he should have remembered that the multitude would be at any one’s back who would show them force, particu- larly of a rude kind, and though at his back to-day they might be at Jezebel's to-morrow. And so they were. And the crowd that under the influence of his great miracle confessed their faith on Carmel with such fervour, crying, “Jehovah, He is God; Jehovah, He is God,” bowed sub- missive to Jezebel’s threat to take the prophet's life in Samaria : So let the gods do to me, and more also, if I make not thy life as the life of one of them by to-morrow about this time.” And Elijah arose and went for his life. II. Observe now the circumstances of his flight and his despondency. Elijah fled. That was necessary. He fled into the wilderness ; not to Zidon as he had done before, not to any of the neighbouring peoples, nor beyond the Jordan, but to the wilderness. That is where you expect him to flee. In any moment of his life the waste was con- genial to him. Its bleakness and isolation were but the counterparts of his own mind. His favourite abode was among the mountains, by the brook Cherith, with only the monotonous rush of waters in his ear among the silent hills. He preferred the ravens for company to men. He seemed alone among men. His greatness made him solitary. There are some men solitary for other reasons, just as there are some mountains. Some hills in our neighbourhood stand alone though they are not great. The forces of 126 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES nature and time have carried away what surrounded and touched them, and left them solitary. And circumstances sometimes alienate or remove men’s associates from them, and they stand apart, not possessing, whether they seek the confidence of others or no. But some mountains stand alone because of their grandeur. Giant hills crowd about the foot of Mount Blanc, yet in their midst he is alone. They cannot reach the same altitude as he, and go with him but a little way. Into those regions of cloud and sky into which he towers they cannot rise. And thus it is with the highest minds. In common things others can accompany them. They can be followed to a certain height, but there other men and they part company. In those lofty regions where only heaven is about — in dense clouds or Divine light — they stand solitary, and being alone, even in the midst of men, they naturally seek solitude. But Elijah fled to the wilderness of Sinai. That also was characteristic. Sinai is the wilderness of wildernesses. On the back of natural terrors moral terrors are accu- mulated. There Jehovah, before whom Elijah stood, showed himself most clearly. That side of God which Elijah had most sympathy with was most fully mani- fested there. He was the prophet of law, of force, of terror ; and he longed to realize the Lord more fully. He would penetrate into the very place of terrors. He would see the mountain where the Law was given, its rugged front, once veiled in awful smoke ; its long fissures, which might have been ploughed by the very lightnings of that dreadful day — might it not be that Jehovah Himself might, as to Moses, appear to him } My brethren, does not this flight of Elijah to Sinai ex- hibit a figure of ourselves } May we not say of it : “ which thing is an allegory } ” Do we never flee there, too? In our conflicts with laxness, and the licentious Baal-worship of our day, when the battle is going against us, do we not invoke the God of Sinai against our adversaries ? At all events do we not find refuge in. Sinai ourselves } I think men flee there often still — when they are wearied with the indifference and vexed with the laxness of those about them. There is an asperity in their frame of mind, a fierce earnestness, a longing, stimulated perhaps by opposition, for a sight of truth as it is ; and that easy-going acceptance ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 127 of it which satisfies most men will not be put up with by them. And it is the severer forms of truth that we desire — law, right, justice, a word of God pure and simple — and our toleration for men whose thinking tends to milder truth ; to rub away the edges of sharp doctrines ; to run every doctrine away into a region over which falls a mist of uncertainty, saying this is mystery, this ends in God, we do not know, we can only guess — our toleration for minds of this class is very little. Their hesitation or reserve seems to us but inconsequence or sluggishness, and our mind with its keen dogmatic edge will have no compro- mise, our cry is Sinai — law. On his way towards Sinai, somewhere about the wilder- ness of Beersheba, in the south of Palestine, there fell upon Elijah that singular weariness of life and despair which we wonder so much at in him — which we wonder at, but gladly* accept, — for it is the touch of nature that makes us and him kin. He came and sat down under a juniper-tree and requested for himself that he might die. “ It is enough ; now, O Lord, take away my life!’' Some part of this despondency might be due to physical weakness, for he fled for his life. But it was almost altogether spiritual. This was the morrow of the day of his transcendant success on Carmel. The tide of spiritual power had never risen so high even in his soul as it had done on Carmel. God had never obeyed him so implicitly as then, and in the presence both of royalty and the masses of the nation. Never before had he felt so confident and wielded with such absolute mastery his sway over men’s minds. Never perhaps before had such thoughts risen in his mind as rose then of a king- dom conquered for Jehovah, and a nation born in an hour, and a realm cleansed from all impurities, and every knee bowed to the Lord. Victory for God was secure, and he was the conqueror. That was yesterday. And to-day spiritual reaction has set in in his own soul, and he is a fugitive, crouching under a bush in the wilderness, the facile crowd returned to its im- pure rites again, not one voice that dares to raise itself on the Lord’s side — the kingdom which seemed the Lord’s not thrown back as it seemed, but hopelessly Baal’s — all his efforts lost. It is no wonder that complete prostration overtook him, and that he requested for himself that he 128 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES might die. It is a hard moment in a man’s life that, such as had now come upon Elijah ; when a man has given the energy of his life to one cherished purpose, and has hoped for it, patiently waiting till the years should roll past, when the promised prize should fall to him ; enduring many hardships, cheered by the prospects ever coming nearer of success, and refusing to let himself think of defeat, his mind always saying to itself that it could not be but that he would succeed. It is a hard moment when at last, through some perversity of will of one in whom he trusted, or some unworthiness of others, or some great error in calculation, defeat ensues when victory was judged secure, and when the once compact purpose of his life is broken into pieces like the fragments of a vanquished host which no commander can ever rally or re-unite. At such a •time only this remains to him, that he judged it truth for which he struggled, and that the means he used seemed to him the best, or at least worthy ; and this, that at any rate God remains to him, to whom he can appeal to judge his cause, and, if he have fought in vain, to release him from the unavailing strife. III. The last thing to notice is God’s treatment of His desponding servant. First, he gave him bodily food, for that was needful, and as we pray daily, “ Give us this day our daily bread,” and as He hears us ordinarily so to hear us is not beneath His greatness when we pray in circumstances extraordinary. Then in the strength given him He brought him to the Mount of God. He gratified his longings. He satisfied his spiritual aspirations. That which he so greatly desired to see He showed to him. He took him up to the very height, and down to the very deeps of that kind of realizing of Himself which he longed to attain to. God as he conceived Him, and as his heart delighted in. He showed him in per- fection. Nay, for his sake He almost re-enacted the terrors of Sinai. ‘‘ A great and strong wind rent the mountains, and brake in pieces the rocks before the Lord ; but the Lord was not in the wind : and after the wind an earth- quake ; but the Lord was not in the earthquake : and after the earthquake a fire ; but the Lord was not in the fire.” Sinai over again, and the Lord not in it at all. Was it for this that he had come so far — was this the fulfilling ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. T29 of the dream of his life, and the reward of his unexampled might and toil ? And after the fire a still small voice. And it was so, when Elijah heard it, that he wrapped his face in his mantle.” This is the Divine method of teaching, the full meaning may be beyond us, but it pointed back to Elijah’s past career, and it pointed onward to one who should use no force, who should not cry, nor lift up, nor let his voice be heard in the streets. Elijah’s methods were tried on himself — power, force, law, Sinai — and the efforts were naught. The Lord was not in the earthquake or the fire. Did the prophet never wonder at the obdurate king, at the besotted people, at the fickle crowd, at the mad vindictive queen ? What had he been plying them with all his days ? Miracle on miracle, a gloomy demeanour, heavens of brass ; famine, thirst, death, law, force. Did he wonder now after his present experience, or was his wonder now not turned in upon himself? He had been enabled to sound the depths of that conception of God, which had all his life fascinated him — he had come to his place and he had found that God was something different from his idea of Him, and that His power was not of the kind that he imagined. Yet there must have been a parable to Elijah in the earthquake and fire which was powerless, followed by the small voice,” in which was God Himself — a parable of Sinai and Calvary, And might there not rise up before him, some such scene as he was yet to witness in the Mount of Transfiguration, and to share in when the thunders of Sinai should die down and become lower and lower through successive ages, till at last they were succeeded by the “ still small voice ” of one who “ did not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the streets,” but who was God with us unto them which are called, both Jews and Gentile, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God ; ” “ for what the law could not do” — even though wielded by an Elijah — God send- ing His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh : that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” This history suggests two lessons. One speaks to those of us who, like Elijah, are set over men in the Lord, and the other to the people. K 130 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES (1) We may see how, though God deals most merci- fully with His desponding servants, He yet gives them to understand that despondency is out of place somewhat — is not a state for men who have work to do. He dealt most mercifully with Elijah. He gave him bread to eat. He brought him to the place of His own awful manifesta- tion. He allowed him to revel in those conceptions of Himself dearest to his soul, to sound them to their deeps. He instructed him, not by plain words, but by indirect displays from which he could not but gather where his mistake had lain. All this was the treatment of a wise and merciful Father. But in the midst of it all He kept saying to him, What doest thou here, Elijah ? The scene of labour was elsewhere, and he was here. And as soon as it was possible to send him back to it the Lord said unto him, ** Go, return ; and when thou comest, anoint Hazael to be king over Syria : and Jehu the son of Nimshi shalt thou anoint to be king over Israel ; and Elisha the son of Shaphat shalt thou anoint to be prophet in thy room.'’ Arise and return to the world and life. His work was not done. In spite of weariness of the world he must face it, he must handle its forces as he finds them, and do his best to direct them. He must not recoil from meeting open foes like Hazael, superficial reformers like Jehu ; there they are, and the servant of God must use them for the best. He must mix with them, study them, comprehend them, declare God’s will to them, and use them for the Church’s advancement. Action, not despondency, is demanded. (2) For there is no reason to despair. We are often cast down with our small success, and ready to throw away the weapons of our warfare and acknowledge defeat. But Elijah’s history shows that success is often much better than appearances would suggest. “ The kingdom of God cometh not with observation.” No influences can be quite lost, only their result is not im- mediate — As the rain cometh down and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither again, but watereth the earth and maketh it bring forth and bud, so shall My word be that goeth forth out of My mouth.” Perhaps all good servants do more work than they imagine. P^lijah thought he had saved his own soul. God showed him 7,000 men who had not bowed the knee to Baal ; and as God’s ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 131 servants do more than they think they are doing, so they will find God putting upon them at the last an unex- pected honour — an exceeding weight of glory. This tem- porary darkness in Elijah's life was swallowed up in the light of the end, and the honour God put upon him in the latter days was unspeakable, when he stood beside the Son on the Mount of Transfiguration. So that it seems that wherein men fail is forgotten by God, and wherein they succeed is the measure of the glory that is bestowed on them. But the influence of a true man of God is profound Elijah thought his influence fleeting and superficial, but it was deep and pervading. Two brief reigns passed over, one of two years and the other of twelve, when the harvest began to be reaped. The nation was full of the spirit of smiting against the bloody and idolatrous house of Ahab. And when the prophet went to anoint Jehu the son of Nimshi, so ripe was the time for a change that the army immediately hailed the new monarch, crying, “God save King Jehu." And the carnage which followed in Ahab's house was terrible and complete, and the religious as well as political revolution which followed was thorough. It was Elijah's spirit working in men — in the army, among the citizens, in the prophets that came after him, in the Rechabites — the severe, pure, monotheistic spirit, the spirit of truth, the spirit which is omnipotent when it rises in the hearts of a people. Surely here is hope and en- couragement for any one that is set over men to be their spiritual guide and to lead them into the way of God and of His Christ. Be assured, that any defeat we suffer is only apparent : victory at the last is certain. Tears may accompany your sowing. It is a hard soil, this human mind which you have to break up and deposit the precious seed in. Yet it is a deep and fertile soil after all. What harvests have been already reaped from it, of godliness and self-devotion, and of all those glorious ideal creations of the mind. And you know how the growth of this good seed in it tends to make it deeper, and to cleanse it of its weeds, and what a rich harvest it may be made to yield at the last. Think of the reverence, and affection, and enthusiasm for knowledge and truth, and for a pure and broad human life, 132 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES you may call out in the young — of the steady attachment to sound principle which you may create or confirm in those that are grown up — of the patience and resignation in sorrow and affliction which you may teach to those that have to suffer, and how you may bring the light of religion into the lonely cottage or the humble dwelling of the poor, which will brighten up every face and gild the straitened ways of life as a ray of sunshine will pass through the narrow windows and lighten up the furniture within. Ah, it is not in Parliament or on the battle-field that deeds are done that are great in God s sight : it is rather on that stage which to men’s eyes seems narrow, but is the widest of all, where individual human souls are engaged in playing out the great drama of their own immortal destiny, reject- ing or accepting, amidst the manifold struggles of mind, the truth which God by you is presenting to them. Think of the influence in a crisis of soul like this, and how a word or a look or a gesture may exert an influence even to eternity ! Think of this, I say, and bring to bear upon your task every resource of your own mind, of circumstance, and of the word of God, strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. But there fs another lesson which this history teaches. The lesson is this : the necessity of standing by those set over you. Elijah’s despair was due largely to his loneliness, to his having to fight the battle of the Lord single-handed. And Elijah was a giant such as men are not now, and yet the forces of the enemy were too strong for him. He had not the support of the people. There were many that agreed with him so far, a number who agreed with him out and out ; there were many meek, mute souls throughout the land who wished him well ; but they wanted courage. Their feelings and their sym- pathies were right but they were not the men that soldiers in God’s army are made of, and of the most it had to be said that they wanted one essential thing — they were not firm in their principles. They halted between two opinions. Hence their sympathy and enthusiasm rose to fever height one day and was cold as the dead the next. The lesson goes deep. To-day you may be enthusiastic, your sympathies are aglow, the tide of feeling rises high in your ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 133 heart, and there is no bound to the extent to which you wish well to the cause which your spiritual leader repre- sents. And you may feel that it is a great cause, as great because really the same as that which Elijah represented ; the cause of the one true living God against all denials of Him or all substitutes for Him — the cause of a pure morality in the land inseparably connected with a pure worship — the cause of the independence of religion of the control and manipulation for State purposes by civil rulers, whether they be fools like Ahab, or harlots like Jezebel, or whatever they may be — the cause of the existence of true religion in every heart and home in the country. It is the same cause now as then ; all this you may feel now, and you may believe that the feeling will remain. So did the crowd on Carmel on the day of the gladness of Elijah’s heart. But on the morrow they feared to lift a finger for him. My brethren, if those set over us are to be successful we must stand by them ; and if so we must be at one with them in principle. I do not say in every opinion which we may hold or express, but in the great principles which move their own lives, and for which among you they have to contend. You must share with them in their love of the Lord that bought you. You must hold with them, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is over all, and through all, and in you all. Everything you do must have its root there; and then your sympathy with them in all their contendings for this will be keen and intelligent — without it your sympathy with them in their work will be languid and evanescent and go no deeper than a certain esprit de corps peculiar to a sec- tional Christianity, It will arise merely out of opposition to others from enmity to the opposite camp, and having no root in itself, when a real conflict comes will wither away. Spiritual teachers in all ages, perhaps, have fallen into the error of Elijah. They have exaggerated, they have gone into ex- tremes into which those whom they taught could not follow them. It is not necessary to follow them into their extremes ; but these extremes are greatly due to their feeling of being isolated, and of the immovable insensibility of those whom they have to instruct. Cordial co-operation, cordial sym- pathy from you in the great general truths of the faith 134 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES will remove these feelings and these exaggerations, and then Christian teaching shall become calm and simple and natural, and the stream of Christian truth and life, instead of being like a noisy brook, dashing itself against everything within its reach, will advance like a great placid broad river without a wave upon its surface, absorbing into itself on all sides every contribution of the thought and life of men, and moving on with a power that nothing can resist, and bearing on its bosom to a blessed end this human family which Christ loved and gave Himself for. A. B. D. XVII. The King Conquered. 2 Kings vi. This chapter is about one of the battles of the king of Syria against Israel. You remember about Naaman. Naaman was captain of the host of the king of Syria, yet he does not appear, at least by name, to take any part in this war. He may have been here, he may have been in the background, but I rather infer that, since he went back to Syria, not only with a new skin, but a new God, pro- bably he fell into disfavour, or was in some way held to be disqualified for his former supreme military position. A very wonderful thing that. Naaman came to be healed of his leprosy, and he got more than he wanted. That is the perpetual history of all earnest men who come to the right quarter for help. No man can come to church, to the living God, with a right desire, without getting exceeding abundantly above that which he came for ; no matter what he came for, if it was of the right quality, of the right nature, and within the compass of the gifts of God to men, within the limits and boundaries of time, then he got ex- ceeding abundantly above that for which he expressly came. Naaman said, ‘‘Well, I will go to him, and I will see if this man can cure me of this leprosy ; and he not only got a new skin, so that his flesh came again as the flesh of a little child, but he got a new God, a new theo- logical conception, a new standpoint from which to view the universe, and to estimate his own life ; and that is what is always happening, and must occur to the end of time. You cannot come to God for any one bounty proper ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 135 to be received at His hands, without receiving with it some additional blessing, if so be you are willingly opening your heart to receive whatever God in His Almighty power and beneficent grace may be pleased to give you. Naaman, then, has gone back again with a clean flesh, the leprosy all gone, and with the God of Israel as his God, and now Syria once more projects war against Israel. I want to study the projection of that war, and how things occur under combinations of circumstances to which you and I ought to be no strangers. Begin, if you please, at the eighth verse. ‘‘ Then the king of Syria took counsel with his servants, saying, In such and such a place shall be my camp.” Was there anything amiss then ? I think there was. Not on the bare reading ; the verse reads well enough — it seems to have been a proper thing to do— and some- times we do a proper thing improperly. Sometimes we tell the truth falsely. How is that } In the telling of truth itself, we may give a false impression — we may preach the gospel destructively : we have not only to announce the good news — the glad tidings — but to do it in the right tone, with gentleness and tenderness and persua- siveness and sympathy. And falling down before men, we have oft entreated them with vehemence and passion, that they may accept the testimony we bring. Well, but the king of Syria consulted his servants — was not that right } Possibly so — if he knew who his servants were. Is there any one man on earth you can really trust in a crisis ? Are there not some points in life when the true consultation is divine and not human ? Are there not some critical moments in your life when you must not speak to the nearest and dearest friend you have, when your life must culminate in a supreme agony, and all your com- munications must be upward, and not lateral, and never downward ? Well, methinks that grand old Roman was right when he said : “ If I thought the shirt on my back heard what I was saying to myself I would tear it ofif and burn it.” That man will succeed, will do something in life. He knows that there are times to be familiar, conversa- tional, communicative, when you may say to the public. Now mv heart is open, come in and see all you can see, and see it for nothing ” — and this wins great reputation for 136 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES geniality and communicativeness. People talk to him as a very familiar, condescending, kind, amicable, and com- municative man altogether ; but he knows exactly when to shut the door and to look dumb. Do you know what it is to look deaf.? You cannot look deaf if you are hearing all the time unless you have the supreme mastery of your- self. A deaf person looks so different from you — I see that you are hearing, in your skin, in your eyes ; the very hair on your head says, I am listening all the time ; I am feigning deafness, but I hear all you are saying. You cannot be deaf unless you are supremely master of your own nature ; but this great man, this great Roman, looked dumb, looked deaf, looked stone-like. There was no read- ing his face. Ben-hadad having got an idea, could not be trusted with it. He called in his servants, constituted them into a kind of Divine Consensus, and began to tell them what he was going to do — and there was an end of him. How many people would succeed if they could be silent? — how many people would do well in life if they knew when to hold their tongues ? They would do exceedingly well if they had not so many people in their confidence; but there are some people who chatter, chatter, chatter, always telling what they are going to do — what they are going to do to-morrow, what they are going to do the day after to-morrow, — and they never do it. How can they — talking so much about it beforehand ? It is like running five miles before leaping over a wall — you are so tired with the running that when you come to the leap you cannot do it. Be quiet sometimes — keep your own counsel. “ How is it. Commodore,’' said a man to old Mr. Vanderbilt, who is just now dead, ‘‘that you have succeeded so well in life?" “Well," said the old man, “first, by minding my own business, and secondly, by never telling anybody what I was going to do, but just doing it." Ben-hadad was no Commodore Vanderbilt in this respect. He called all the people together and said in effect, “ I know now what I shall do," and he told them all about it, and thus split himself up in a dozen different directions. He lost that concentration, that consolidation, that cannon-ball-like compactness of perfect solitude which gives a man supreme power in supreme and definite crises in life. ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 137 Let us see then what happened after all this talk. ‘‘ And the man of God sent unto the king of Israel, saying, Beware that thou pass not such a place ; for thither the Syrians are come down. And the king of Israel sent to the place which the man of God told him and warned him of, and saved himself there, not once nor twice,” but many a time. So the thing got abroad. Well, now, here is Elisha. Elisha is no soldier. No; Elisha, to use a modern phrase, never fired a gun in his life. No — he knew more about a plough than about firearms — excuse my modern- izing the instance. What did he do ? “ There was a little city, and few men within it ; and there came a great king against it, and besieged it, and built great bulwarks against it ; now there was found in it a poor wise man, and he, by his wisdom, delivered the city.” What did Elisha do } What you, dear little child, can do : what you, feeble woman, can do : what you, man of no public status or influence, can do. What was that ? He warned — he gave warning, he gave caution, and suggested pru- dence. He pointed out the difficulty and how to avoid it. Just observe, then, how we serve one another in life. The Apostle Paul complains that if a man do not give a certain sound upon the trumpet the soldiers cannot prepare them- selves for battle. But do we want trumpeters as well as soldiers ? A man that gives an uncertain blast on the trumpet ruins the fight on his own side ; the man whose trumpet is in tune, whose breath is equal to the occasion, who blows a blast that strikes inspiration into an army, is himself a crowd of soldiers. Just observe how we serve one another. Elisha was a man of thought — a man of prayer — a man of contemplation, and yet he sends warn- ing to the king of Israel, and by a warning word he saves the king of Israel from the arrows of the Syrian assailants. Now there be some persons who cannot reckon up the in- fluence of people who do nothing but talk, and teach, and pray, and warn. They have not got the true conception of work. Their conception of work is limited to the arms. Only give a man plenty to do with his hands and they claim him as a working man. But if a man so live as apparently to have nothing to do with his arms at all, then it is impossible for the people to whom I am now referring to consider the man as anybody working — whereas Elisha 138 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES did more with his one warning word than if he had gone to the head of the Israelitish army and led the hosts into the thick of the fight. That is a word for you, mother — that is a word for you, sister — that is a word for you. letter- writer, you who only sit at home and write a few kind notes to your friends — for you, more public writer — for you, student — for you, minister — for you, praying soul. We can all serve one another. The men that came back from Jerusalem and spoke to Nehemiah had done nothing whatever themselves to repair the wall — they only told Nehemiah about it, and Nehemiah went and did it. So Elisha heard of this, and warned the king of Israel, and saved him from a great battle with the Syrians. Use your influence; do what you can. You want greater power — use the talent you have. You shall see Rome also if you live faithfully in the cities and villages in which Providence appoints your place. Have you ever warned anybody? This Book excels all other books in this one particular — monition — warning — caution. Other books are always controverting, discovering, fighting illuminated battles, and registering things and putting things in order, and settling debates, and strifes, and contentions with some other book somewhere else in the world. But this dear old Book is full of warning, and sympathy, and direction, and practical counsel ; it gets into the soul, it takes the language of our necessity, it prays with us, sings with us, gives us words wherewith to express our best emo- tions, helps our life upward and onward — a right positive Book, a grandly affirmative Book. Yes, if I could but listen to its voice — and you — we should always find our- selves on the right road, in the right temper, in the right spirit, with a very grateful heart and two very industrious hands, in the service of God. Don’t, then, snub men who are not working in your own particular way. This is the great difficulty we have with one another. There is only a man here and there, a very rare man indeed, who sympathises with other people’s way of working, who does not think if you don’t do just what he does and nothing else, you are not working. But an ordinary man thinks if you go to his meeting, read his books, dance his dances, and fuss away in his little fussinesses, then you are working. But if you have any other conception of service, and are working from ON THE OLD TESTAMENT. 139 any other conception of stewardship in the sight of God which he cannot understand, you will very likely be troubled in your progress by his very small censure, by his vicious malediction. Oh that we could just know that we are all working in the way we can. I see a man yonder working in a way I cannot — I wish I could — but I must work in the way I can. Another says, I can only pray — that is, only move Omnipotence, only help to bring Al- mightiness to your side — only speak to God for you — it is a wonderful ‘‘only'' that. You be faithful to that “only" and you will help all men, you will help the universe. Now then Elisha, the quiet, contemplative, observant man, with an ear quick to all-but-infinite sensitiveness, hearing whisperings where any other man could hear nothing but a great silence, and he is warning and thus saving, teaching and thus delivering — and it will be a bad, black, woeful day for this England when you lose the teachers and the warhers, the seers, the prophets who dream dreams and see visions, and can lift themselves up in all the erectness of a majesty higher than their own, to declare to men what they ought to do and what they ought not to attempt. Let us pray for our prophets, and say, “ God bless our teachers, every one." “ Therefore the heart of the king of Syria was sore troubled for this thing." There he is again — Oh that men should live on such poor flats, poor planes, low levels ! The king is troubled and he calls his servants. Oh if he had only been a wise king, if he had only looked upward and inward, if he had only been quiet with a prayerful quietness and reverence, he might have done something more in that contest. But he lives among men, a social man, a chattering man, one of those people who could not spend an evening at home — one of those persons who always want to get away from their own com- pany, one of those men who says, “ you know — what I can do, sitting here ? what can I do — I wish somebody would come in — I wonder where I can go to, I do so want to talk ! " What do they do in life ? Nothing — but make a noise. O my friend, when thou art in trouble, call upon God — call upon the Divine, call upon the Supernatural It does you good to think that the firmament above, if it be but blue steel, brightened here and there with a patine of fine gold — it does you good to think you can catch hold 140 EXPOSITORY SERMONS AND OUTLINES of that great blue arch and lift yourself up an inch ! That will do you good. But it is this motion that does you harm — getting down, as if the help were yonder. The help is never yonder. Whatever your perplexity or difficulty, the help is always up — never down, never lateral. There it is that religion, in any true and grand sense of it, does a man infinite good —just to get into his head the idea that there is a greater power than himself, if it be but the wind, or the great solemn thunder, or the mighty rolling stars and suns. To fall down on your knees and look up at the sun, clasping your hands in reverence before his brilliant image — that will do you good. It is this curse of always living on a low level that ruins us — calling in our equals, calling in our inferiors, calling in the people that are round about us. It is all right enough under given circumstances, as a secondary palliative and as a help in many a misery — all right enough. But there ought to be a supreme, glad, re- ligious aspiration going out of the heart to find the big, the mighty, the All, the circumference of things. O my friend, if thou couldst but do that, everything would be under thy feet. Thou shouldst be calm, and h^ppy, and very glad always ; but as long as you look, and look, along the line of your eye- — have everything hung so that you can get it there, you are dwarfing the universe, you are dwarf- ing yourself, limiting