THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY 33'2 3675 THE SPEECH OF MR. JOHNSTONE, THE THIRD READING OF THE BILL PREVENTING THE GOLD COIN OF THE REALM FROM BEING PAID OR ACCEPTED FOR A GREATER VALUE THAN THE CURRENT VALUE OF SUCH COIN; COMMONLY CALLED LORD STANHOPE'S BILL. Friday, the 19'" of July, 181 1» LONDON: PRINTED FOR J. BOOKER, 61, NEW BOND-STREET, By yV. Clowes, Northumberland-Court, Strand. 1811. THE SPEECH, I HOPE my Hon. Friends will do me the justice to believe, that I have felt very great pain when compelled to differ from them in every stage of this proceed- ing; but still entertaining the opinions w^iich I had occasion to deliver when the Bank- Restriction Bill was passed, and on the dis- cussion of the Bullion Report, it was impos- sible for me to have acted otherwise without a dereliction of character and consistency. When the Bank-Restriction Bill was enacted I was a very young Member of the House, and I did not venture to oppose a measure which seemed B 2 to meet with general concurrence ; but I took the liberty of stating my very great apprehen- sions, lest it should be followed by all the calamities which in every country have resulted from giving to paper a compulsory circulation ; and since the depreciation, which I then fore^ saw, has become manifest, I consider it an imperative duty to use my endeavours, how- ever feeble, to persuade the House to retrace its steps. This Bill has been supported, first, as con- formable to certain dicta of Mr. Pitt: se- condly, as a necessary consequence of the re- striction itself: and, thirdly, as indispensable to protect the tenant against the oppression of his landlord, and the stockholder against the manifest injustice of receiving his dividend in paper, while the private creditor compels a metallic payment from his debtor. As to the first point, I must be excused, if, after a lapse of fourteen years, I am disposed to place no great faith in such an authority, tvhen opposed to Mr. Pitt's public measures and Parliamentary declarations. Secondly, if it be considered to have been the purpose of the Restriction Act to force a paper circulation upon the country, whatever might be its depreciation, this Bill is the ne- cessary consequence of the measure : but if the intention of that Bill was to give a cur- rency to Bank-notes so long, only, as they bore a value equal or nearly equal to specie ; and, by giving to every individual a power to de- mand payment from his debtor in metallic value, to take a security against the deprecia- tion of the Bank-note beyond a certain point ; then is this Bill by no means a necessary con- sequence of the Restriction Act. On the third point I shall have occasion to dwell at greater length hereafter : I shall only here observe that the argument supposes an actual depreciation of the Bank-note ; and as it is admitted by all sides to be an act of fraud, to pay a debt contracted in good and B 2 4 lawful money with a depreciated paper cur- rency, so it becomes the duty of every man to resist it by all the legal means in his power. But there is another consideration, which leads me to approach the decision of this question with considerable apprehension: — ^I mean our financial situation. Gentlemen who have turned their attention to this subject are well aware that our unfunded debt in Navy and Exchequer Bills amounts to no less a sum than forty-five millions, the largest part of which is returnable into the Exchequer, in payment of the existing taxes, four months after it has been issued. If, in consequence of the proceedings now adopted by Lord King, there shall be any considerable demand on the private bankers, they must endeavour to re- alize their funds, which are chiefly placed in these securities; and if from ibis or from any other cause there shall ensue a considerable fall in the value of public securities, no part of the current revenue will be received at the Exchequer, but the whole will be paid in the 5 Exchequer-bills now outstanding. What maj be the consequence of a failure in the ordinary receipt of revenue it is not easy to foresee, and therefore, if the Chancellor of the Ex- chequer had proposed this measure as of a temporary nature, avowing the disorder pre- vailing in our currency, professing an intention to take the subject under consideration in a future Session of Parliament, and precluding the further progress of depreciation by limiting the issues of the Bank to the amount at which they at present stand, I should not have refused my concurrence, in order to pre- vent the possibility of alarm. But his senti- ments are of a very opposite nature : — he maintains that the present sj^stem stands in no need of amendment; on the contrary-, that it is connected with the national greatness : and he has distinctly stated, that if this Bill shall be found ineffectual to support the credit of Bank-notes, it is his intention to make them a legal tender. I am compelled therefore to re- fuse my assent to the Bill, because no dis- order in our finances, no disappointment in our plans of external warfare, is equal in danger 6 to the evils of a violation of the sacred law of property, uniformly consequent, in all ages and all countries, on measures like the present. With a view to understand, how far this Bill is calculated to answer its professed purpose, it is material to consider, how the law actually stands, and what is the purpose of Lord King in the appeal he has made to it. In this House, it is sufficiently known, though not fully un- derstood in other places, that the effect of the Restriction Act in 1797> and the other mea- sures connected with it, is to make payments in Bank-notes obligatory on the public creditor alone, by placing him in such a situation, that if he refuses Bank-notes, when tendered to him at the Bank, in payment of his dividend, he can get nothing else. In the acquittal of all obliga- tions between individuals, the wise and salu- tary maxims of the law are unimpaired, and it is yet the privilege of Englishmen, that in the payment of a debt of twenty shillings, they may refuse all the paper of the Bank of England. Not only is this the wording of the statute, but the (jase has been solemnly considered 7 and ruled by llie unanimous opinion of the four Judges of the Court of Common Pleas, in the instance of Grigby v. Oakes. Under these circumstances. Lord King has formally announced to the world, that he will no longer receive a currency, manifestly depreciated, in discharge of obligations, contracted when tl)e nominal and the real value were the same ; and that he will assert his right and seek his remedy in a Court of Justice, Such is the portentous evil against which we are required to provide by legislative measures, and now, for ths first time, have we heard censure, nay criminality, attached to an appeal to the law, which has hitherto been regarded as our only safeguard and protection. There are some Gentlemen, who, disap- proving of the Bill generally, do not object to that part of it, by which all process by dis- tress is suspended, on tender being made in Bank-notes ; they deem it expedient that all summary process shall be suspended, by which men may be induced to submit to the demands of Lord King ; and consider it essential, that 8 Parliament be actually sitting, when the final judgment of the law is pronounced. An Ho- nourable Friend did put some very pointed questions to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, as to the actual state of the law, but had not the good fortune to receive explanations equally distinct; yet he must be well aware, that al- though the process of distress is prompt and efficacious, with a view to secure the landlord from ultimate loss, it does not accelerate the decision of any point of contention, more than the other remedies reserved to Lord King, — an action on the case, or by ejectment. In every instance of distress, the tenant may re- plevy, and, on giving security to the Sheriff, the cause cannot be decided, and judgment obtained, in Itss than two terms : if, therefore, Parliament shall refrain from interference, and Lord King remain at liberty to exercise all the powers of distress, the cause cannot be tried in Westminster Hall until the next As- sizes, nor judgment obtained until Hilary Term, in January 1812, or if the cause shall be tried before the Judge of the Assize, as is probable, a final decision will not be had before the month 9 of May. This will equally be the result of an action on the case, and therefore no power of deferring a decision is granted to the tenant by this Bill, which he did not actually enjoy by the law of the land. AVith a view to delay, with a view to the purposes for which this Bill has been chiefly approved, it is altogether unne- cessary. But I am reminded by the looks of my Ho- nourable Friends, that this Act has a far more important operation, and that, by the words in the Bill, " or other person liable to such distress,'" it is intended to exempt Bankers and other persons, who have issued one and two pound notes, under the 37tii of the King, c. 32, from the compulsive obligation to pay in money, contained in that law. 1 cannot believe this Act will be so construed. By the Act of the loth George III. the Le- gislature, with a view to pievent a paptr cur- rency from intermixing in all the rttail trans- actions of life, had inhibited the circulation of Bank-notes under five pounds. Its wisdom was 10 praised by eminent political writers at the time, and became manifest upon experience. Upon the stoppage of the Bank it was, however, re- pealed, and private Bankers obtained the ad- vantage of circulating one and two pound notes. But the aame law provided against excess and consequent depreciation^ by giving to every hokler of such notes the power to demand pay- ment in money; and, in case of refusal for a pe- riod of seven days, any Magistrate is empo\yered to levy the amount, by distress and sale of tl]e goods of the party. We foresaw the possibi- lity of excess and consequent depreciation, and did take security against it, by putting it iip the power of every holder of such notes to compel a payment in money, by thi^ summary process, as often as he felt the mischievous con- sequences of a redundant circulation. Upon what principle is it that private bankers are, in this insidious manner, now to be relieved from their own obligation ? Were they ignorant of the nature of the rcsponsibihty they in- curred, when they issued their notes ? Was the fulfilment of their obligation in any degree de- pendent on the resumption of cash payment? ? 11 Was it not incurred when casli {)ayments at the Bank had ceased, and when they knew that cash for the fiilfihiient of iheir contracts must be obtained fioiii other quaiters? Having accepted this benefit, with the burthen an* nexed, will the House absolve them froii) their engagements after a period of fourteen years ; after tlie enjoyment of a privilege so beneficial as to have increastd tlie number of bankers from 275 to 7/0? Even if a demand for gold compelled them to fulfil their engage- ments on the terais specified by Lord King ; if they were subjected to a loss of seventeen per cent, on each guinea; is it unfair or un- just, or is it more than the advantages they have already derived from the beneficial traffic in which they have been engaged ? It is most remarkable, that, throughout the discussion of the Bill in another place, this intention was never avowed, and that the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in the speech by which he first recommended it to the fa- vour of the House, never touched on this point. They who introduced this clause in another 12 place, could not be ignorant of its operation ; and if they actually meant to effect so im- portant a, change, under cover of protection to the tenant, they were not only guilty of a want of fairness towards that Assembly, but acted most insidiously. I cannot suppose them guilty of a conduct so unworthy ; nor will it be believed by the Judges of the land, when this question shall be argued in Westminster Hall, that the guardians of property in another As- sembly, — that we, whose regard to its sacred principles is such, that we suffer not the mi- nutest right of common, founded on the oc- cupancy of the lowliest cottage, to be af- fected, but after due notice,— that the Parlia- ment of Great Britain, tacitly, and insidiously, repealed the contract by which currency was given to 12 millions, in the notes of private Bankers;— a contract solemnly and delibe- rately prescribed by Parliament, as affording the only remedy against a misuse of the privi- lege it granted. As to the other clauses of the Bill by which it is attempted to make things unequal in 13 value, reciprocally exchangeable, I will not he- sitate to say that it is a violation of natural right. Upon what principle are we now to prohibit the possessors of paper and gold from interchanging their several properties, on any terms which are mutually beneficial ? Is it just to pervert the law to such a purpose ? or, evea if it were just, is our authority competent to ac- complish our object? What has been the experience derived from all legal interference with the interchange of property? AVhat is the result of the existing law for prohibiting the exportation of specie, and other laws of the same description? Plave they proved effec- tual in any one instance? So many cases have been put by different Gentlemen in the course of the debate ; and the experience of all ages, on this subject, has been so uniform, that even the authors of the law cannot indulge a hope, that it will be effectual. If circumstances render it advan- tageous or necessary, that parties should ex- u change their several properties, exchanges must and will take place in spite of all our efforts j and the only consequence will be, to add to the cost of the exchange, resulting from the se- veral values of the commodities exchanged, the additional expense, which is to com- pensate for the danger of being engaged in. a violation of the law. I entreat my Honojur- able Friends to consider the case stated on ihe last discussion, in respect of silver. To supply the want of silver currency, issues of dollars have been made, first at 5s., and lately at 5s. 6d; they have vanished from circulation, in proportion as Bank-notes have depreciated. By the progress of the disease, the silver Tokens, lately coined, will become more va- luable in their metallic state, than in the shape of coin, and, like the rest, will speedily disappear. The same scarcity of silver^ aa has lately existed, will recur ; and, as the bu- siness of a Banker cannot be conducted with- out silver change, he must give a premium for it, correspondent to its advance in value compared with notes, and an increased com- 15 pfensation to those who incur the legal dangers of conductino; the barter. " I cannot suppose, that my Honourable Friends Seriously hope, that this Bill will support the value of the paper currency; but it is expected, Chat by giving a Parliamentary discountenance to the measure now adopted by Lord King, of demanding payment in specie, the general adoption of the practice will be prevented. — Vain and delusive hope! much as I condemn the abuse which has been heaped upon that Nobleman, I should be disposed to add to it in an aggravated degree, if, after deliberately engaging in a question of such importance, he should meanly shrink from bringing it to a final issue. But even if he were to be so want- ing in consistency, there are others who would undertake the duty. The depreciation of paper is become manifest to the whole world; the loss is no longer inconsiderable ; it now amounts to twenty j^cr cent, nearly ; and as the Law has not yet rendered it compulsory in the acquittal of obligations, i\Ien owe it to themselves. Men owe it to their country 16 to appeal to those laws which are still in ex- istence for the protection of individuals, and for a fair and just fulfihnent of contracts. This therefore is no other than a prefatory mea- sure, to render Bank-notes a legal tender. The Chancellor of the Exchequer, with that fairness^ and I will add with that courage, which be- longs to him, has distinctly stated his purpose. He has distinctly announced, that unless we are content to receive Bank-notes in all pay- ments, unless we are content to forego the rights we derive from the Law, he v^iil propose to Parliament, to render them a legal tender. I now therefore implore the House gravely to consider what in every country has been the effect of such a measure. Has it not universallj been attended with the ruin of the public cre- ditor, and with the subversion of private pro- perty? And by what delusion, by what infatua- tion is it supposed, that to us alone belongs an exemption from calamities, which have ensued among all other nations ? Great offence is taken by Gentlemen, when, tracing the progress of this measure, among 17 other nations, it is said : you will proceed from legal tender to a maximum, and by a maximum cause a total stoppage of all pursuits of trade and agriculture. 1 am willing to allow, that in the present state ofmen's minds, it seems impos- sible w^e should ever be brought to enact Laws of this nature; but how gradually do the ne- cessities resulting from our own improvidence, and the difficulty of tracing back our steps, alter our opinions, and induceour assent to measures formt rly regarded with the utmost reprobation ! In fact is not this very Law, a Law of maximum in respect of gold and paper currency, which must aggravate the evil it is designed to remedy, by banishing from the market an article no longer permitted -to find its own value? and is it not supported by a Minister, who first recom- mended himself to public favour, by minutely tracing the progress of similar measures among our Enemy? Before we give sanction to the most oppressive Laws evtr adopted in any country, to support a depreciated currency, it is not necessary for us to depart further from our present opinions, than we have already c 18 departed from the maxims of our ancestors, when we listen with complacency to the Chan- cellor of the Exchequer, suggesting the future necessity of paper currency becoming legal tender, and a Director of the Bank proposing the immediate adoption of such a resolution. How little are we now conscious of the pride and exultation with which we once repeated to ourselves the well-known words of Mr. Burke, " our paper has a value in commerce, because in Law it has none — it is powerful on 'Change, because in Westminster Hall it is impotent'/ Then it was the just boast of an Englishman, that a creditor might refuse all the paper of the Bank of England in payment of a debt of twenty shillings. Now ^^^e overwhelm with reproach the individual who has been found to exercise the right. I am not disposed to exaggerate the gloom which such changes of opinion, and such mea- sures, inspire ; and since it is offensive to so many Gentlemen to designate Bank-notes by the term of assignats, I will refrari) from IP it. But when Gentlemen state that a hundred and thirty millions of assignats were issued in one year, and, in a confident tone, ask, would you compare such a currency with Bank-notes, of which the whole issue is twenty-three mil- lions, I must be permitted to remind them, that this issue was in the last stage of the dis- ease; that we are now only commencing our career; that when Mr. Burke was writing some of the reflections I have quoted, the issue of assignats had not exceeded sixteen millions, which were less depreciated than the present currency in Bank-notes. I have undoubtedly the utmost confidence in the wisdom and ho- nesty of Parliament. I believe, that even if we do noi return to a metallic circulation, we shall proceed in the career of depreciation with less rapidity, and with more regard to the principles of justice, than any other nation: but I cannot indulge the hope, that we shall escape mischiefs from which none have been exempted. There is no such radical difFerence in our situation, as will warrant such a hope. Other nations, like ourselves, have used the agency of Banks; c 2 50 several times has France defrauded her cre- ditors through the agency of the Caisse D'Escompte, and other Banks. A very large part of the depreciated paper now current in so many of the States of Europe has also been issued through banks and companies. But we are told, with that complacent smile, which too often marks an Englishman, when he speaks of the institutions of his own country, the Bank of England is founded upon princi- ples different from all other banks ; it advances its notes only for values actually deposited in its coffers. I know not, that the principles of the Bank of England are in this respect dif- ferent from the principles of any other bank. No establishment of this kind ever professed to make advances of its notes, but for securities of adequate value, and I am not aware of any great bank, (the Ayr Bank excepted,) that failed by a departure from its principles, except through its accommodation to Government. I cannot perceive the difference between the Bank of England making advances on an Exchequer-bill and the Caisse D'Escompte 21 issuing its notes on the acceptance of a Farmer- General of the revenue in former times ; except in as far as the Government of England is more likely to maintain its faith than the Go- vernment of France. Too close a connexion, too liberal an advance to Government, has uniformly first discredited, and ultimately ruined, every bank. Governments, in their dealings with banks, resemble a class of cus- tomers not unusual, who, in order to pay one bill, demand permission to discount another; so, in the next year. Government will faith- fully discharge its obligations ; yet we shall probably find, that the claims of ihe Bank on the revenue of the approaching year are some- what greater than at present. Therefore the true matter for our consideration is not con- cerning the principles on which the Bank is constituted ; but is it now an independent body, in the same degree as in former years ? and has it not increased its advances, and drawn closer its alliance with Government ? It has been said the progress of depreciation was rapid in France, because papet* was issued for the capital of the debt created in supporting war; it i$ slow in England, because we issue paper for the interest only of the capital. Il was properly answered, by the Chancellor of the Eixchequer, that we provided for the interest of our debt by annual taxes ; but are not the accommodations of the Bank progressively increasing, either in the shape of advances, or by purchases of Exchequer-bills in the market? I disagree with those who profess themselves unsatisfied, unless the Bank possesses a guinea in its hoards, for every note that is put into circulation. Such is not the principle on which paper currency in these Islands has been established. But I may be allowed to ask, is the Bank of England actually solvent, except in as far as Government shall discharge its obligations ? I voted for a Com- mittee to inquire into the affairs of the Bank, in order to ascertain what proportion its other assets bore to its demands on Government. The Peputy Governor of the Bank of England has since enumerated demands of this description to 23 the extent of nineteen millions, to which is to be added ^£800,000, advanced to the East-India Company, on the security of 1,200,000 three per cents, and the whole amount of Exche- quer-bills purchased by the Bank in the market, making no less than 26,000,000. Under such cir- cumstances, the Bank is little else than amachine of Government, and cannot control its own progress. Who now denies that the stoppage of cash payments was the result of measures which the Bank was compelled to adopt by Mr. Pitt.^ At that time the Bank Direction was com- posed of persons, (Mr. AYinthrop and others,) brought up in the sober school of mercantile economy ; they entertained no wild notions of extending trade, or carrying on war, by paper credit; and, foreseeing the dangerous conse- quences of the propositions to which they were urged, they forcibly and solemnly protested against them. Did their opposition prevail.? did not the importunity and influence of Go- vernment compel them to yield assent to mea- sures which ended in stoppage ? If such was the influence of Goveraineiit at that period, who 24 shall entertain a hope that the Directors can now refuse to accede to the requests of Govern- ment, now that Government protects the Bank against its own creditors, with a de- gree of zeal proportioned to the pecuniary ac- commodations it has itself received ? Let us only consider what occurred last year after the examination of the Bullion Committee, after it became the deliberate opinion of all candid and impartial men, that it was expe- dient to try the effect of a decreased issue with a view to remedy the exchanges. It is impos- sible to suppose that the Bank Directors were not willing to have made the experiment, and the opportunity was afforded them. After having ex(Mcised the utmost liberahty in sup- porting commercial credit, the demand for dis- count fell greatly short of its usual extent, and a diminution of the circulation might have taken place without affecting the commerce of the country, which had been urged as the great motive for sustaining it on so enlarged a scale. But did the Directorsof the Bankfind themselves at liberty to make this salutary experiment, by 25 diminishing their circulation in the same proper* tion as the demands for conin^crrial discounts had diminished? was not the influence of Go- vernment exercised to induce the Bank to make advances to Mr. Goldsmid and others, and to purchase Exchequer-bills in the market, to such an extent, as involved an increase of Bank- notes to the amount of iwenty-three roilhons, being three nuUions more, than in the former year, when tiie issue had been de-emed exces- sive? In this, I blame neither the Govern- ment, nor the Bank; great mischief might have followed, if they had not done so ; public securities might have fallen very con- siderably; and if they had fallen, the Revenue would have been paid in Exchequer-bills, and the resources of Government have entirely failed. 1 state it, only to shew the impos- sibility of the Bank diminishing its issues in the present state of things ; to prove, that we must go on in the same course in which we are proceeding : and thus to demon- strate, that the depreciation of Bank-notes, which now amounts to twenty percent, has no 26 other limit, than the wants and necessities of Government. If the House will not take warning from what has happened in other nations, at least let us derive instruction from our own lesis- lalive proceedings. On a former night an Honourable Gentleman stated the course of the American Legislatures, even when acting under the control and supervision of the British House of Commons. After a paper currency was substituted for the precious metals in each State of North America, its depreciation speedily followed, and gradually proceeded in its course, during a period of sixty years-, in times of prosperous trade, and in periods of adversity; until Parliament, disregarding the arguments, which now meet with so favour- able a reception in this House, consulting the principles of justice, and impressed with a strong sense of the manifold evils resulting from such a system, proceeded to put an end to it by a legislative enactment. I refer to the Act of the 4th of Geo. III. cap. 54, the preamble of which never ought to be ab- 97 sent from our minds : " Whereas great quan- tities of paper Bills of credit have been created and issued in His Majesty's Colonies, or j^lan- tations in America, by virtue of Acts, Orders, Resolutions, or Votes of Assembly, making and declaring such Bills of credit to be legal tender in payment of money ; and whereas such Bills have been greatly depreciated in their value, by means whereof debts have been dis- charged with a much less value than was con- tracted for, to the great discouragement and prejudice of the Trade and Commerce of His Majesty's subjects, by occasioning confusion in dealings, and lessening credit in the said Co- lonies." — I humbly beseech the House to direct its attention most carefully to tliis instructive case ; because it affords an example appli- cable to our present situation in every part. First it shows, that whenever a paper cir* culation has been substituted for a metallic currency, no prudence in the issue of it ; no attachment to the principles of justice; not even the supervision of Parliament legislating as Judges, and not as Parties, can preserve it from depreciation. Can the representative of 28 money be as valuable as the thing represented, unless convertible into money at pleasure? -Can a promise to pay, at a period indefinite, be as valuable as an actual payment ? In every State throughout the Colonies, deprecia- tion varied only in proportion to the modera- tion observed in the issues of paper. In some States it amounted to eleven hundred currency for 100 pounds sterling, while it was only one hundred and thirty per cent, in the wise, moral, and religious state of Pennsylvania, Secondly, it proves, that in such a state of things, the evil has no tendency to correct itself, and is no way influenced by what is called a favourable or unfavourable balance of trade. During 6"0years, our American Colonies carried on the most favourable commerce; yet they de- rived no accession of the precious metals suffi- cient to supersede the use of paper currency, though in the immediate vicinity of the mines which supplied the world. Thirdly, the proceeding is said by Adam Smith to bear resemblance to a scheme of 29 fraudulent debtors to cheat their creditors^ and its injustice and impohcy are forcibly set forth in the emphatical words which I have quoted from the Act. But the Americans them- selves were totally unconscious either of the cause or the result of the system. Like ourselves they attributed the fall of exchange to the de- ranged state of commerce, and being for the most part debtors to the Mother Country, loudly complained of the injustice of Par- liament, when it enacted that paper should no longer be deemed legal tender. Lastly, we may hence learn how vain is the apprehension, generally entertained, that, by a recurrence to cash payments, we shall want a measure of exchange in all the ordinary trans- actions of human life ; since we find, that a currency which had existed during half a cen- tury, and extended to the minutest fractional payments, was decried after a period of fourteen months ; and that the precious metals imme- diately assumed the place of the former depre- ciated paper, without occasioning the least embarrassment to individuals, or to the State, 30 and with incalculable benefit to the com- munity. Having said so much, with immediate refe- rence to the Bill, I hope I may be allowed to trouble the House with a few words concern- ing the effect of a depreciation of currency, as the subject appears to me much mis- understood. It has been conceived, that the present is a question which chiefly cou- cerns the landed interest : but, in point of fact, it relates, ahnost exclusively, to the public creditor, and all others who have fixed incomes ; and touches the landed pro- prietor no otherwise, than during the period for which his leases are granted. It must be sufficiently evident to every one who has re- flected upon the subject, that, as the value of all articles depends upon their relative plenty or scarcity, whenever the currency of any community is increased, whether consisting of the precious metals, or of paper, it must represent a smaller quantity of all other ar- ticles. When this change takes place, each party naturally endeavours to shift the burthea 31 from himself; the landlord demands a higher rent, and obtains it, because the value of land is measured by the quantity of labour which it can command, and by no other scale : the price of labour is in no degree affected, the value of labour being in all cases proportioned to the demand for it, and paid for, in a cer- tain proportion of the necessaries and conve- niencies of life, whatever may be the nominal values which represent that proportion. Nei- ther are merchants and traders, who buy to sell again, in any way injured ; they only pay a greater nominal value for each commodity they purchase, which they sell again for a pro^ portionate increase :— nay, in every instance, where they trade upon a borrowed capital, ihey are benefitted, as they are enabled to acquit the original debt contracted, with a less quantity of real value. The only per- sons who are substantially affected and in- jured, are the public creditors, and all other classes of men who have fixed incomes, or are under contracts, the measure of which is regulated by a monicd price ; they have no means of casting the burthen fruni their own S2 shoulders ; the amount of their receipt is fixed^ and limited by the engagement itself, and in reality daily decreases by becoming ex- changeable for a less quantity of every other article. At first view, it might be thought that the State stands in the same relation with this class of persons, its revenue being fixed, and its expenditure dependent on the value of the labour and other articles which it has oc- casion to purchase : but it will be found that so much of the revenue as consists of ad valorem duties, such as the Stamps, Property Tax, and many others, rises with the deprecia- tion of the currency; and, above all, the State Las the power of compensating ilself for a de- preciation in the value of its revenue, hy an in- crease of Imposts. The State, therefore, re- mains a gainer, on all payments made to its cre- ditors, of the difference between the value of money at the time when it pays, and the value of money at the time the loan was contracted ; and ultimately Nations have generally availed themselves of such a contingency to expunge their public debt. The wealth, the industry, the commerce, ihq agriculture of the nation, 35 are neither advanced nor impeded. To sup. pose that the State acquires a power of main- taining foreign wars, and adds greatly to its pecuniaiy resources, by means of the depre- ciation of currency, is an absurdity reserved for present times : — foreign wars can be sup- ported only by the surplus of our agriculture and commerce, beyond what is necessary for our own consumption ; and the means of the State are always proportioned to the extent of that surplus, whether represented by a greater or smaller quantity of nominal value. When therefore the first symptoms of depre- ciation become apparent, the public creditor, and every class of persons enjoying fixed in- comes, are peculiarly entitled to the care and protection of the Legislature, because their condition depends wholly on the faith and honour of the State. By various natural causes, their incomes are liable to gradual de'erioration ; but, if to this be added a de- terioration arising from the depreciation of 34 the currency itself, the State is then guilty o( the utmost degree of injustice and oppression. When the stoppage of the Bank took place, in 1797, our necessities compelled us to be guilty of this injustice, by paying the public creditor in paper, instead of metallic currency, leaving othercl asses of creditors to exact a metallic pay- ment from their debtors, whenever they thought fit But this, so far from being an undue prefer- ence of the private creditor, seemed to the pub- lic creditor, an important security against an indefinite extension of injustice. It kept alive a memory of the true measure of value, and of his contract with the State. It w^as calculated to retain more metallic currency in circulation, than would otherwise have remained. It seemed a guarantee for moderation in the issue of notes, since none were bound to accept them but while they were judged of equal value with cash, and the guarantee would have been effec- tual, if we had been individually vigilant, hen the early symptoms of depreciation became apparent. 1 fr m unsus^?ecting confidence de- pieciation siiould ensue, and men should insist 55 on metallic payments, as Lord King is now doing, confidence in the justice of the British Parliament forbade the apprehension, that when every individual was enabled to obtain payment of his debt in the good and law- ful money in Avhich it was contracted, the Stale would persevere to pay ils creditors in depreciated paper. Now the argument of the Noble Lord (Lord Castlereagh) is a little curious. His sensibility is extremely acute on this subject. " Would you,'' says he, " commit the monstrous injustice of paying the pubhc creditor in paper, while the pri- vate creditor is paid in metallic money?'* an argument in itself a confession that paper js less valuable than coin. The just re- medy would be to pay the public creditor according to the terms of his contract. " But," says the Noble Lord, " Take from the private creditor the right of demanding pay- ment according to the terms of his contract, and deal out the same measure of injustice to both parties, by compelling them to accept payment in depreciated paper." On behalf of P 2 36 the public cre<3itors, 1 do most earnestly pro* test against the remedy proposed by the Noble Lord. If the necessities of the State do not enable it to fulfil its engagements with us, our lot will not be alleviated by an infraction of justice extended to other descriptions of men: let them enjoy their rights in their fullest ex« tent; the wrong we sustain must be so manifest to all mankind, that in process of time, relief may be granted to us ; but if a common mea- sure of injustice be extended to all other mcm» bers of the community, then we shall be en- tirely forgotten, and finally afford to mankind another example of the fate that awaits those who enter into engagements, in which right is on one side, and power on the other. But let me now examine the conduct of Lord King, which has been as much condemned by the public in general, as wilhin the walls of the House. After the most deliberate and sober reflection, I solemnly declare, that in my judg- ment, he merits the thanks of the public, rather than its censure. I do not hesitate ta 97 avow, that for the last three years, during which depreciation has been going on, I have very often dehberated on demanding payment of debts in metalhc money ; and if I have been deterred from doing so, it has not been from any doubt of the justice of the measure: but being totally unconnected with parly, and fully sensible of my own insignificance, I did not find in myself courage to brave the clamour which I foresaw would be raised by the many persons interested in the continuance of the present system of things. By this declaration, I trust, I shall not be deemed to brave public opinion. He who affects to place himself above the opinion of mankind, is more or less than Man ; but entertaining these sentiments, 1 wili not, while I am conscious of their rectitude, shrink from the avowal of them, because they piay be unpopular. AVhat is the spirit of the contract between a Landlord and his Tenant? — ^lliat the landlord shall receive a monied rent equal to a certain proportion of the pro- duce of the soil ; — and if a monied rent paid in notti, actually depreciated, no longer rtpre* 38 Sents that proportion of the produce, is it un- just or unfair to require payment in metallic Currency, which more nearly represents that pro- portion ? Suppose the Noble Lord to have let, in 1780, a field capable of producing four quarters of wheat, worth on an average of the last 15 years 180 shillings ; and to have allowed 135 shillings for the labour and stock of the tenant, and reserved to himself a rent of 45 shillings of metallic money, or one quarter of the produce. Suppose the same field still to pro- duce four quarters, which, on an average of five 3^ears,sells for 85shillings per quarter, or340 shil- lings, in paper currency. The sum necessary to compensate the labour and replace the stock of the tenant will be 225 or I of the produce, every article necessary to cultivation having advanced in cost in the same proportion ; but if he can acquit himself of his rent by 45 shillings of the same currency, he will be a gainer of 40 shil- lings; the share of the landlord, which, in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made, amounted to ^^, will be reduced to | ; and the farmer, who looked to U, will receive t. 39 Kepayment is not demanded of the k or 40s. thus lost by the landlord, and gained unexpectedly by the tenant. Lord King was aware of the natural depreciation of money in a rich and flourishing country, and is content that his te- nant shall enjoy a very large portion of the gain. He requires only that his contract shall be executed in the terms in which it is con- ceived ; — 45 shilhngs formerly contained about 9 ounct s of standard silver, and were repre- sented by 18 pieces, called half-crowns. The mystic word " Bank'' has been imprinted on their face, and he is required to receive these same pieces as of the value of three shillings, though no individual in the community will give in exchange for them, a particle more of his property, than when they passed by their old name. Our tone and manner of thinking may have altered, since the case is no longer viewed in the abstract ; such transactions, how- ever, in other countries, and among ourselves in other times, have been stigmatized as gross and barefaced frauds. But the currency of the Bank, though it may have lost of its value on 'Change, is not yet omnipotent in Westminster 40 Hall ; and Lord King has appealed to the law of his country, to enforce the rights which still remain to him. But it is urged that landlords may exercise a grievous oppression over tenants. These names, whenever they are used, we consider to be descriptive of parties between whom, respect and attachment, kindness and pro- tection, mutuaily exist, And, happily for this country, so rare is the character of a harsh landlord, that I believe much of the odium attached to Lord King has proceeded from an idea, that some severity to the tenant was in contempJation. The calculation with which I have troubled the "House will show, that even if rents were paid in the manner de- manded by Lord King, the gain of the tenant, which is now 40s. upon a payment of 85s., will only be reduced to 31s., an advantage accruing to the tenant from the increased abundance of the precious metals, and other circumstances. But, even laying these circumstances out of our view, the tenant, whose currency consists for the iflost part of private bankers' notes, will be 41 no sufferer. Neither the public, nor Lord King» seem to have been aware of the 37tli Geo. 111. cap. 32, I was not till lately conscious of the powers it granted to enforce payment, in money, of one and two pound notes from the private bankers, who have issued them. By means of that Act the tenant who holds such paper will be entirely relieved. When- ever the landlord demands a metallic pay- ment, it will only be necessary to cany the very notes, with which the tenant has usually paid his rent, to the private bank, and demand their value m specie. The law has provided efficacious means for enforcing the (demand ; and if any hardship or inconvenience or loss is sustained, it will fall, where it ought to fall, on those who, during fourteen years, have reaped large gains from the circula- tion of notes ; who, by the extent to which they have pushed their issues, have rendered manifest and intolerable the depreciation inseparable from paper currency. I hope no man will judge me to speak invidiously t I consider all private banks as institu- tions arising out of the wants of the com* 42 munity, and eminently useful. So far from concurring with those who would sacrifice them at the shrine of the Bank of England, I would rather forfeit all the benefits resulting from that establishment, than disturb one in- dividual in his honest calling, whether founded on the accumulated capital of several gene- rations, or upon a bare confidence in the probity and industry of the individual. But I will not, I dare not, release him from the performance of one tittle of his engagement. If it be demanded, as in the case of the tenant, " Did the parties look to the fulfilment of the contract in any other manner than in Bank- notes.^" I answer. They did so look. Not only Ls the private banker bound to pay one and two pound notes in money, by the general law of the land, from whose obligations no man is exempt by reason of ignorance ; but, by the 37th Geo. III. cap. 32, a distinct and special contract was created ; private bankers were allowed to press their circulation into the re- tail transactions of life : but this great source of emolument was permitted to them only on the special condition of converting their notes 4» into money at the option of the holder, under pain of specified penalties. The boon was accepted, with all the obligations attendant on it; each village soon produced a banking shop; for fourteen years the country has been sa- turated with paper currency, and profits have been enjoyed beyond the wildest expectation. Auer such a lapse of time, when at length it is perceived, that the easy confidence of the country has been abused ; when our circulation is manifestly depreciated ; when each indivi- dual has been injured in his fortune by a departure from the only true and just mea- sure of vdlue; shall we stigmatize the individual who refuses to receive a oepreciated currency, and exercises the option granted to him by the Law, for the very purpose of preventing that depreciation which the Legislature foresaw? I ask the Noble Lord, if, when the Assignats were first sent forth into circulation ; if, when the American Congress, in the year 1775, first issued their currency ; if, when our own Co- lonies first emitted that compulsory paper 4^ wh\eh Patliament has described as pregnant with so many evils ; if, in those countries, there had been found a person, who, disdaining pub- lic clamour, and appealing to the Jaws of his country, (and thpse lavvs could have been en-? forced,) had refused to submit to the aggra^ rated injustice of receiving such paper in discharge of an obligatioii contracted in good and lawful money ; 1 ask the Nobie Lord, if sttch a pei*son, rousing the nation from its slumbers, had rendered it sensible of the evils of all compulsory paper, and restored the use pf metallic currency; would such a man havp tepn stigmatized as regardless of the obiiga^ tions of conscience, and insjensible to the pro* $perity of his country? But It is said that the public mind has been jdisturbed, and its confidence in the notes of the Bank of England abated. 1 believe th^t a confidence jn the note§ of the Bank of England is very little influenced by our resolutions. If our opinions could attach estimation to them, we have already declared them equal in value 45 to the precious metals : but on such subjects mankind are influenced by the evidence of tlieir own senses, and estimate all articles by their value in exchange. The little importance attached to our opinions in the market cannot be better illustrated, than by the fact stated by an Honourable Director of the Bank, that, ^vlnle this Bill has bfcn under discussion, ex- chano^es and tli-* price of bullion have btcume more favourable. The Noble Lord is likewise of opinion, that a sense of nmiul duty should have deterred Lord King from the course which he has taken. I can very well admit, thai if the depreciation was very inconsiderable, as in the f rst year after the res»triction, when the precious metals and paper were readily exchangeable for each other, at a small premium, it would have been improper to have disturbed an order of things with which the country was generally satisfied. But I wish to know to what extent this for- bearance is to be carried : if a sense of moral duty may induce our submission to a depre- ciation of five per cent., are we bound td submit to a depreciation of ten ? or, if to ten', to fifteen or twenty ? Under such circum- stances, if Government, from temporary mo- tives, refuses to remedy a disease so fatally progressive in its nature, and avows its deter- mination to persevere, — is it unbecoming a man of high rank and irreproachable cha- racter, raised above the suspicion of mercenary motives, to proclaim the wrong he feels, and to appeal to the laws of his country to remedy an evil which can be resisted only in its incipient stages? For be it always remembered, that, if we shall persevere in this system, and depreciation shall increase, it will be impossible to retrace our steps ; the hardship of compelling the fulfilment, in me- tallic value, of contracts which have been formed at periods of depreciation, being no less apparent, than to suffer a debtor to dis- charge, by depreciated paper, an obligation contracted when the real was correspondent with the nominal value of money. Let us not deceive ourselves : let us not fortify each 4/7 other in error, by reviling the man who recalls us to a dispassionate consideration of this sub- ject by an appeal to the Judges of the land, to that tribunal which is exempt from passion and prejudice. Does or does not depreciation exist? is the true test by which the conduct of Lord King must be judged. If depre- ciation does not exist, he has erred greatly : but if depreciation does exist, and to a con- siderable extent, then is he the defender of the rights of the public creditor, and all other persons enjoying fixed incomes, as payment to them in a depreciated currency has ever been acknowledged to be a most manifest injustice. And now to the question of depreciation, to which I should have addressed myself in an earlier stage, had I conceived that it would still have been denied. I despair however of con- vincing any man who is not already satisfied. Have not two years now elapsed, since the exchanges with all foreign countries have been depressed, below their usual level, to the amount 48 tifiO per cent. ? Do not the precious metalsj Compared with Bank-notes, bear the same re- lative irtcrease of value? Has it not been stated, that, in Jersey, the guinea exchanged for twenty- five livres, and the Louis d'or for twenty-four livres ; that the Jersey Bank-note for k Louisj payable in specie, exchanged for twentj^-foUr livres, and that the English Bank-note ex- changed only for twenty livres? Is it not ac* knowledged, even by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, that the precious metals are more valuable than paper under certain circum- stances? and if more valuable for any supposed purpose, must not that alone give them a value in the general estimation beyond paper, which is not so applicable ? But will the evidence, re- sulting from the late issue of Bank-tokens, like* wise be denied ? The whole cannot be greater or more valuable than the parts of which it is composed; three notes of one pound each cannot be more valuable than twenty Three- shijling pieces of the new currency ; and these twenty Three-shilling pieces actually contain something less than the same quantity of 49 standard silver, as was contained in twenty half* crowns. Suppose the Bank-notrs for twenty- three milhons, nuw in circulation, annihilated, and the same represented by a proportionate number of three-shilling pieces, would Gentle- men then assert that our currency was net de- preciated ? The same quantity of silver as was contained in fifty shillings would represent sixty shillings, and would any one deny that the denomination of our standard was raised, which is precisely the same thing ? But really, in dis- cussing this question, Gentlemen of the gravest character^ and enjoying the highest authority in the House, for accuracy^ and acquaintance with subjects of this nature, seem to feel them- selves at liberty to indulge in the most extra- vagant perversions or omissions. Would it be believed, that the Treasurer of the Navy had twice entered into a discussion of the amount of our currency, and had each time omitted an item of thirty millions in his calculations ? Would it be believed that he had totally left out of consideration the circulation of the private bank-notes previous to the restriction, K 50 and in the present times? He has stated that the amount of our circulation in former times was thirty millions of specie and eleven millions of Bank-notes, and asked how it was possible to conceive a redundancy in our present cir- culation, when it consisted of twenty-three millions of Bank-notes, and when our gold was reduced to a sum not exceeding five millions ; making in the whole twenty-eight millions, instead of forty-one, of which it formerly consisted? I believe this estimate of our specie to be con- siderably exaggerated ; but, proceeding upon the Right Hon. Gentleman's own data, his cal- culation is manifestly defective. Private bank- notes formed a material part of our circulation before the restriction, and now exceed our Bank currency and specie united. Conformably to the Right Honourable Gentleman's own view, our currency was 30,000,000 Specie 11,000,000 Bank-notes 7,000,000 Country notes ; 51 Its present amount is 5,000,000 Specie 23,000,000 Bank-notes 32,000,000 Country notes, Making sixty millions in the whole ; and constituting an addition to our currency of 12 millions instead of a diminution of 13 ; or an error in the Right Honourable Gentleman's statement ib the extent of 25 millions. I hope I shall not be deemed presumptuous, when I most earnestly implore the House to attend to the facts that regard the circulation of private banks, because very little attention has been bestowed on the subject, and it has been thought impossible to ascertain the amount of their circulation. It is sufficiently known, that, by various acts, a stamp duty is imposed on all promissory notes re-issuable, progressive according to the value expressed on the face of the notes. From October, 1804, to October, 1808, the £2 5% duty by the 44th Geo. III. was Sd, for every note, the value expressed on which did not ex- ceed • • • • c£i 1 6<7. ior every note not exceeding 2 2 Qd. lor every note not exceeding 5 5 Is. for every note not exceeding 20 These duties, since October, 1808, have been increased by the 48th Geo. III. on a scale with which it is not necessary to- «jrouble the House. It is greatly to be lamented, that ac- counts of the produce of the duties on pro- missory notes re-issuable, cannot be had from an earlier period than October, 1804, they having been confounded with the duties on bills of exchange. Had they been in existence, we rniiiht have traced the progressive increase of private bank circulation from its origin. But the accounts since October, 1804, have been kept with the utmost regularity, and show the amount of stamps of each class which have been issued. Notes for ^.5 and upward^ may be re-issued as often as they return upon their issuers, during three years after their first 55 emission, when the law requires th<» issuers to cincel them. Notes of one and two guiueijs may be re-issued for a period unlimi'cd, it having been assumed, that, in the course of (Lree years' circulation, they generally become so rubbed and worn as to be defaced, and inca- pable of further circulation. This statement was furni'^hed to the Treasury by tfie pri\.ite bankers, and therefore the average circufatif)n of these notes may be presumed lo last so long at the least. It is evident that no banker will incur the expense of issuing a note with a new stamp, as long as he has in his possession any notes which have been returned upon him, and are circulable; neither will he keep by him any large quantity of stamps ready to be filh d up, when communication with the metropolis is so easy and expeditious. The number of stamps issued in three years antecedent to any given period will therefoie show the number in actual circulation. The only deduction to which the gross amount seems liable, is, for the banks which have failed, or declined busi- ness duritig the interval, which Gentlemen may estimate in any manner they pkase, but- 54 which can scarcely be equal to the number of stamps which remain in circulation beyond the period fixed by the law. Proceeding upon these data, we have there- fore the means of ascertaining the issues of private bankers with considerable accuracy, by calculating ihe sums issued on the several classes of stamps. I assume that for every 3d. stamp on which the private banker is com- petent by law to issue a promissory note for one guinea, there shall have been issued a promissory note for one pound only ; For every del. or two-guineas' stamp,£2 For every Qd. or five-guineas' 5 And for every is. or^£20 and upwards, 10 only. The actual issues cannot have been less; ihey probably have been more. Applying this cal- culation to the stamps in the year ending October 1805> the result will be as follows : 2,905,600 £ i Is. stamps at £ 1 only ^2,905,600 32,000 2 2 2 ,.., 64,000 823,466 5 5 5.... 4,117,330 502,600 20 10 .... 3,026,000 iS-^i'^Koba^GfiG 4jip,ii2,9aj9 55 Pursuing the same method in the following years, we have Forl806- -stamps 4,032,155 £10,337,905 1807 2,834,072 6,123,620 1808 2,901,051 8,011,659 1809 7,574,663 15,332,429 1810 4,405,054 9,617,081 Hence it appears, that the number of stamps in circulation, at the end of three years, in October, 1807, was 10,929,893, and the cor- respondent value of the notes issued by private bankers was £26,574,455 In 1808 9,767,278 24,473,184 1809 13,309,786 .. • 29,467,708 1810 14,880,768 .... 32,961,169 The issues of the Bank of England have been progressive in like n]anner : — In 1807 17,500,000 1808 17,500,000 1809 20,000,000 1810 23,000,000 Combining the issues of private bankers with the issues of the Bank of England, the whole 56 paper circulation of the kingdom will have been :— 1807 44,000,000 1808 42,000,000 1809 49,400,000 1810 56,000,000 I entreat the Treasurer of the Navy will do me the honour to bestow his attention on tliese facts. They are founded on documents which cannot be controverted. In each calculation I have assumed that the actual issue of the private banker is the smallest sum for which the stamp is available, and not the largest, as I might have been justified in doing. The result would have given an increased circulation of several millions. But, if I am not in error, all doubt as to depreciation must cease. Here is an end of the argument, that our circulation has been gradually extended with the increase of our commerce and our revenue, during a lapse of fourteen years. I am willing to allow, that, until the year 1808, our paper currency may have extended itself with some relation to these ^7 circumstances, though with much more rapid progression. But what has been the state of our revenue, or our commerce, during the two last years? Our revenue lias advanced a little; but our commerce Ijas declined, as my Ho- nourable Friends tell me, and its decline is the cause of the evils we suffer. To what thea has this enormous increase of paper circu- lation been owing? — ^To the facility of the Bank in granting accommodation to Govern- ment, and to the activity of private Bank- ers to push the circulation of their notes in proportion to the increased issues in the me- tropolis. The depreciation of paper in former years was chiefly a tiubject of private discus- sion among speculative men. But, when seven millions were added to our currency in one year, can we doubt the cause of the fall of our exchanges ? and when an addition of a like sum ensued in the succeeding year, shall we be surprised if the depreciation of paper is now universally manifest? That prices ad- vanced more than one half during the latter 58- part of the l6th century is universally known; and the importation of the precious metals from America, which in no year exceeded six millions, diffused throughout the world, is acknowledged to have been the cause. Will then the sturdiest believer of the immu- table value of Bank paper now maintain that fourteen millions can be added to the paper circulation of Great Britain in two years, without producing some effect of the same nature? Even the Noble Lord may hesi- tate in longer asserting that our disease is the scarcity of gold compared with paper, rather than the redundancy of paper compared with the precious metals. In my mind the diffi- culty is, how so great an increase of currency has produced so little advance of prices; and I might thence doubt the accuracy of my own statement, if I did not call to mind tht many historical facts, which prove, that prices do not instantly follow an increase of the circulating medium, and do not find their true level until it has been fully diffused throughout the com* 59 munity, and intermixed in every transaction of life. But there is another view on which I am content to rest this question. In a former de- bate, a Right Honourable Gentleman of the most extensive information, and tlie utmost candour of mind, called upon a laie Secretary of the Treasury, who had greatly dislingui^^hed himself on such subjects, to state, wheiher he contended, that the currency was depreciated on a general view of prices ? I then accepted the challenge, and declared that the argument for depreciation was at an end, unless it could be shown that the currency was depreciated on a comparison with all those articles, which po- litical writers, in considering this question, have adverted to as tests of depreciation. As to the price of wheat, which is deemed by Adam Smith a more accurate criterion of the value of money than any other commodity or set of commodities, I can only repeat what 60 has been better expressed by Lord King birn. self. It will be found that tlie price oK wlu-at on an average of fifteen years, from 1771 to 3 785, was 4-66, a quarter; from 1786 to 17?)7 it was 5'2s. a quarter; and i'roni 1798 to 1810, (omitting 1800 and 1801 as /ears of dearth,) wheat has been 71*'. a quarter. It will turtKer appear, that in the year 1797, wheat b« iug at 52s. a quarter, a p^und Troy of gold, viz, 44j guineas, or £-16 : 14 : Gd. sterling, repre- sented 13 quarters of wheat. From 180^2 to 1806, when wheat was 70.v. a quarter, one pound of gold at the Mint price of £3 : 17 : lOid, per ounce, represented ISn quarters of wheat : but at the real price of gold in tlie market at £4 : 2s. per ounce, it represented Hf^ quarters. From 1806 to 1810, the average price of wheat lias been 85s. a quarter. One pound of gold at the Mint price represented 11 quarters; and at the mean price of gold in the market, which may be stated at £4 : 7^*. per ounce, one pound of gold represented 12| quarters. But if the price of wheat be objected to as 61 the tpst of value, shall this queslion be tried by reference to the tables ot Sir George Shuck- buFih Evelyn ? They were constructed to as- certain the vahie of money from the Norman conquest, and have been highly celebrated for accuracy. They are founded on a comparison of the pi ice of wheat, of twelve different articles of hubbandry, of day-labour, and of butcher's meat, and an average is taken of the whole as the true measure of depreciation. This calculation gives a depreciation greater by about a fifth, than if calculated by llie price of wlieat only. Assuming 100 as the integer in the year 1550, the depreci:ition in the year 1700 was 238. In 1795 the depreciation was 426 by the price of wheat, and 531 on a mean of the four articles. The same calculation continued to the present time will give a de- preciation of 696 by the price of wheat, and 820 on a mean of the four articles. A Pamphlet has been published, not wanting in ingenuity, in which the depreciation of our currency is controverted, because the monicd 62 prices of cotton, sugar, coffee, tea, tobacco, currants, and nutmegs, are not advanced be- yond the prices in the year 1800. But did any writer ever deem these to be articles by which an estimate was to be formed of the comparative value of money ? If coffee is to be used as the standard of value, the result will be, that, instead of any depreciation in the course of the last century, the currency has advanced in value, coffee being now five times cheaper than it was in the beginning of the last century. But, taking as a test the table adduced by the Author of the Pamphlet him- self, it will be found, that every article of agricultural produce, and every other com- modity not susceptible of indefinite increase by machinery or other improvements in manu- facture, is really advanced in price nearl}^ in the same proportions. A few exceptions have been quoted, such as iron and wool : but the first is to be accounted for by the improvement of our home manufactures, and the second by the large importation from Spain. If these facts be correct, they will effectually confute 05 the doctrine, that " it is not paper which is " depreciated from abundance, but gold which " is become scarce/' The House will re- collect what reprobation this doctrine, when first started, incurred from Mr. Fox, and with how little favour it was viewed by Mr. Pitt, though now the doctrine of the day, applauded and followed by Merchants, and Bankers, and Ministers. We have never been told by what scale Gentlemen, when they so argue, measure the value of gold ; but are they prepared to deny, that the prices of the precious metals must be measured, like other commodities which by an unrestrained sale have found their level, by the labour and capital necessarily employed to bring them to market? Are not the pre- cious metals dear or cheap, in proportion as they exchange for more or less of other arti- cles, on which certain portions of labour and capital have been expended ? — If, as stated by Lord King, one pound Troy of gold now re- presents in its real value 13 quarters of wheat instead of 18 quarters, which it represented 64 formerly; and if all prices bear something of the same proporiion to gold ; it cannot be doubted that gold is cheaper, or, in other words, that gold represents less value than formerly. We likewise know by the testimony of Humboldt, and every other w^riter who has visited Spanish America, that the metals raised from the mines exceed in the proporiion of 3 to 2 the quantity raised in former periods. Theexportation of silver to India and China has also ceased of late years. Indeed ^ve now hear of reimportations from these countries. But, •what I deem of no less importance is, that very large quantities of the precious metals, hitherto used as coin in the several countries of Europe, are no longer employed for that purpose, and are returned into the bullion market to be ap- plied to their metallic purposes alone. What is become of the twenty-five millions supposed to have circulated as coin in this island? Has not a large part returned to its other metallic uses? and could such an addition be made to the quantity of precious metals in the market of Europe without producing a sensible reduc- t'on of their price ? Does not an increased 65^. quantity of gold and silver plate, and other ornaments, every where strike our senses ? which is not accounted for by the increased wealth of the community alone, but must like- wise be traced to an increase of the metals them- selves. Facts of the same nature have been equally remarked in countries, which have not advanced in opulence like this nation. Through- out France a great increase in the nominal prices of labour and other things has been noticed by the Statistical Reports of all the Prefects. This increase has extended itself to Poland, and other parts the least accessiblq to commerce. It has been estimated at 25 per cent., which will correspond with the de- preciation of 45 per cent, observable amon^ ourselves, being 25 per cent, for the decrease in the value of the metals, and 20 per cent, for a decrease in the value of Bank-paper, when compared with the metals. Yet it had been imagined by many Gentlemen, when these dTscussions commenced, that the price of gold had risen on the Continent for no other reason than because gold passed out of this r 66 country. I entreat they will reconsidtr the facts, and I venture to assert, that there are only two articles in existence of which gold now represents a larger proportion than it used to do: Silver, from the increased fecundity of the nnnes, and an improved mode of working; and Bank-notes, from the redundancy of the manufacture. A Right Honourable Gentleman (Mr. Van- sittart) who brought forward resolutions, which, it was contended by their advocates, would set at rest this question, admitted Irish Bank-notes to have been depreciated in 1804, because two prices existed, and one exchanged for a larger portion of commodities than the other; which he denied then to have been the case in Eng- land. He was answered : " Wait the decision of De Yonge's case, now under the consideration of the Judges, and you will here also see two prices generally established.'' The case has been decided conformably to truth and^justice, hy which alone the Judges of the land have ever been actuated. Two prices do now exist 67 publicly, as in fact the}' did exist privately, and will exist after our Bill. Not a street in London where more value in exchange cannot be obtained for one hundred guineas in gold, than for one hundred and five pounds in notes. Will the Right Honourable Gentleman still deny the fact? or will he argue that the pre- cious metals have acquired an artificial value? Such cant is unworthy of the candour and knowledgeand talents of that Right Honourable Gentleman. He knows full well, that the Law may give an artificial value to a paper cur- rency, because it may cause it to be received in payment of revenue, and enable a debtor to acquit a debt of one pound with a shilling : but the value of guineas, like other articles, is regulated by the labour and capital necessary to bring them to market ; and they never can possess any other value. After all these proofs, and the many more which may be adduced from our own daily expenditure, he who still continues to deny the depreciation of Bank- paper, can only be classed with the Ministers of Austria, who still complain of the machi- p2 6h nations of merchants to keep down the Ex- change, when the price of Government paper compared with specie is as 4 to 1. But there is a considerable class of persons^ who, admitting the dangerous consequences of a further perseverance in the use of paper cur- rency, still ask, How shall we get back to a metal- lic circulation ? Where shall we find the pre- cious iifietals in sufficient quantity to supply the place of so much paper? And when a Learned Gentleman had argued, " Leave them to find their way hither; they wiN come as claret docs ;*' a great advantage in point of argument was sup- posed to have been obtained by the supporters of the Bill. But I still do not hesitate to say on this^ as in so many points of our case. Look to your own legislative proceedings. Notwithstanding this and many other arguments of the same na- turcvyoiadid decry the paper currency of North America, after a period of 14 months ; and though no means were adapted by the State to procure an importation of the precious snetals, they were found in sufficient quantity 69 to supply all the purposes of a circulating medium. But if an example of a more siiikmg nature be necessar}', it is afforvlcd by France. Withoijit warning, without preparation, the paper circulation ceased, and the country re- turned to a metallic circulation. Nor has history recorded a single complaint of the inconvenience derived from the inadequacy of the circulating medium. Louis d'ors returned into the market the moment mankind were sure of obtaining for them their real va- lue; and though the circumstances, \yhich caused them to preserve their coined form, are not equally cogent in respect of guineas, yet jnany more guineas wili speedily appt ar among ourselves than are suspt'cted to exist, as soon as >ve shall follow the same course. Can a great and rich community, which draws to itsrif whatever is most rare and valuable in nature by the market it affords, alone want its due proportion of the precious metals? Did any nation ever tajke direct me.ins to draw to ii5>elf the precious inetal^, or have they not diflusecj 70 themselves throughout the world in search of a market? All nations, by a singular fatuity, have enacted laws to preserve more than a due proportion of the precious metals ; but has any nation been successful ? Whatever be the purposes to which they are destined, whe- ther to be used as coin, or as plate and orna- ments, or for any other imaginable purpose, each nation possesses its due proportion, and no more than its due proportion, on a com- parison with the amount in existence through- out the world. When a nation substitutes a paper for a metallic currency, the coin dis- appears ; and happy it is that such is the case; nor will that portion of the precious metals which formerly existed in the shape of coin ever come back, whatever may be the state of trade, because it is not wanted for coin; and for all purposes of metallic use a due proportion already exists in the market. Or, if the precious metals did come back, they would again quit the country, from the same reason as first caused them to disappear. On 71 the other hand, as long as a country persists in the use of metallic money, no circumstances in the conduct of its neighbours can draw away the proportion it requ-res. The first fact is sufficiently proved by the history of our Colo- nies already stated ; and the last is strikingly illustrated by the situation of the four northern counties of Ireland, which still retain all the pre- cious metals in the shape of coin formerly pos- sessed by them, though they have vanished from Great Britain and all the neighlx)uring parts of Ireland. But if ever there was a moment when this apprehension, at all times groundless, must be absurd, it is now, when, by political events, this country, which formerly drew the precious metals from the markets of Europe, has itself become the emporium, from whence all the other nations of Europe draw their supplies. Where, but to this country, must the produce of the American mines be brought? and yet it is supposed, that we alone shall want an arti- cle of which we are the distributers to the whole world. If it were not the present fashion to disregard ihe authority of all great writers on Political Economy, ^vhose oj:)inions for half a century have be^n regarded as axioms, I would remind the House of the words of Mr. Hume : " A Government has great reason to preserve with care its people and its manufactures ; its money it may safely trust to the course of human affairs, without fear or jealousy." But on all these occasions a short answer is given : — " Your doctrine is good in the ordinary state of human afl^airs, but does not apply to a crisis, when all commercial intercourse is at an end, and we have to contend with an enemy, who is pursuing a course of measures of which no example is afforded." This has been so often repeated, that many an Englishman, many Gentlemen in this House, in general "well informed, and devoting a sufficient portion of attention to the public documents, consider Prance and the Continent of Europe her- metically sealed against British commodi- ties, and our commerce reduced very greatly below its extent at any antecedent periodu To all such I take the liberty to state, that at no period since the beginning of the present war, have our exports both of British produce and of colonial articles been so great as during the last two years, as the returns in official value will show : — British. Colonial Produce. Exports in 1802 26,990,000 14,400,000 1805 25,004,000 9,950,000 1806 27,403,000 9,124,000 1807 25,190,000 9,395,000 1808 26,691,000 7,862,000 1809 35,104,000 15,182,000 1810 34,940,000 10,945,000 But although Gentlemen cannot deny the figures I have quoted, being the result of the Custom-House documents, and presented to our view with the accounts annually laid upoa the table, they will answer, that this export has been to America chiej6[y,from which returnshave not been had, whilst our exchanges are chiefly affected by an intercourse wjth Europe itself. 74 Here likewise I am happy to be able to satisfy them; for it will appear, that, confining our view to the Continent of Europe, our exports during the last six years have increased in a greater progression than to all other parts of the world. Exports to and Imports from tjie Continent of Europe in official value : — Exports. Imports. 1805 15,465,430 10,008,649 1806 13,216,386 8,197,256 1807 12,689,590 7,973,510 1808 11,280,490 4,210,671 1809 25,722,615 9,551,857 J810 19,606,706 12,476,140 Again will this fact be met with an assertion, that though our commodities have undoubtedly been exported from hence,yet, owing to various confiscations and checks and impediments, no adequate return has been obtained, and the -greater part of our goods still remains in dep6t at Heligoland, at Gibraltar, and other places 7S to which they were carried with a view to their ultimate introduction to the Continent. To what extent a deduction must be made for these circumstances, I am unable to esti- mate. I am wilhng to admit that it may have been considerable, though far less considerable than merchants in general would have us be- lieve. During the year 1809, our enemy was engaged in the Austrian war; his attention was wholly occupied with that important object, and his armies being drawn to the Danube, an opportunity was afforded for the introduction of our manufactures into Holland and other parts, with little or no restraint. Various se- vere decrees were promulgated towards the end of the year; but the measures for their enforcement could scarcely be adopted before the commencement of 1810, when his armies were spread over the North of Germany. Ac- cordingly we were expressly told in the Speech from the Throne, in the month of January 1810, with reference to our commerce and revenue during the year 1809, that, " What- 76 *' ever temporary and partial inconvenience " may h4ve resulted from the mcysures, which '* were directed by France against those great " sources of our prosperity and strength, those ** measures have wholly failed of producing '' ^^y pernfjanenl; or general efFect/'-r--Jivcn for the first six months of 1810, as long as King Louis ruled in Holland, the decrees of th,e frnemy do not seem to have been rigorously enforced ; nor do our merchants seem io have taken much alarm until October. These are reasons, which induce me to believe, that the losses from all these causes have been much less than the public generally imagine. But what chiefly influences my mind, is the continuation ^©f ithe increased export during two years. Had lt been for a single year, the enterprise of our inanufacturers, aided by the unlimited exten- sion of credit, resulting from the creation of paper circulation in the year 1^09, and tlje impatience of our merchanj^s tp rid tliemselves. ^f Colonial produce, ^vith which the market is glutted, might have tempted them to send abroad their commodities, Avithout due consi- 77 deration of the difficulty of obtaining returns. But when our exports in the year 1810 have proved nearly as great, it is impossible for me to beheve, that no adequate consideration has been received for our exports in 1809. I sub- mit to the plain sense of mankind, whether it is possible that our exports to the Continent, which in the year 1803 were no more than 11,300,000, having in 1809 increased to 23,700,000, should have continued in 1810 at 19,600,000, unless a tolerably fair return had been obtained. I am strengthened in this conviction, because I find that an export of coffee having taken place in 1809 far beyond what could be sold, the export, which had been in that year 5,845,000, sunk in 1810 to 1,454,000. In other articles there is no such fluctuation. Our woollens and hardware, sugar raw and refined, indigo, and even piece goods, the produce of India, are nearly in their rela- tive proportions during each year; and what is most remarkable is the export of our cottons, which has advanced progressively : — 78 Cotton manufactured Goods* Twist. 1805. 1806- 1807- 1808' 1809- 1810. 8,771,000 1,086,000 9,896,000 854,000 9,867,000 669,000 12,835,000 575,000 18,634,000 1,097,000 18,041,000 1,075,000 But to put an end to the averments that no adequate value has been received for our ex- ports to the Continent, I refer to the account of exports and imports in real values, which shows that for an export of £27,190,337, we actually received in 1809 an importation of £19,821,601. The account for the year 1810 in real values has not yet been made up. But as there has been a diminution of exports of four millions, and an increase of imports of three millions in official values in the year 1810 compared with 1809, it is probable, that the exports and imports for 1810 in real values will nearly balance each other. Allowing therefore seven millions to have been applied to defray 7a our military and naval expenditure abroad in two years, we have received a full value for every article of export. Account of Exports and Imports in real values ;— 1805 20,435,940 21,744,762 18C6 17,547,243 17,855,524 1807 15,420,514 17,442,755 1808 13,983,123 8,905,099 1809 27,190,337 19,821,601 Even British shipping has increased in spite of the frequent intervention of neutrals to con- vey abroad our commodities ; and the number of our merchant seamen has advanced, not- withstanding ihe increase of men in His Ma- jesty's Navy. I therefore undertake to say, that no material diminution will be found to exist in the exportation of any one considerable article of British manufacture, or even of colonial pro- duce, whilst in several, and particularly in our 80 cottons, there will be found the enormous in* crease I liave stated. Nor need we be sur- prised at the fact. During the first years that followed the renewal of war, France had given great encouragement to the establishment of cotton manufactories, and had succeeded to a considerable extent. After the Milan Decrees, our Orders in Council prevented the impor- tation of the raw material, and such a de- mand was thus created for cotton goods as, in its effect, far more than counterbalanced all the impediments opposed by the enemy to their sale and use throughout the Continent. I also think, that a careful examination of the ex- ports and imports will tend to show, that up to the end of the year 1810, (of what has since happened I do not pretend to speak, no docu- ments having been submitted to the House,) the commercial embarrassments, so loudly com- plained of, have chiefly resulted from the excess of our colonial imports, and the superabundant, increase of our manufactures, and not from a diminution of our communication with the 81 Continent, on a comparison of the last eight years. Nor is it difficult to account for the niisapprehension that prevails. Merchants were unwilling to confess a state of tnings in which much of the evil seemed chargeable to themselves. Opposition was willing to believe that the trade was totally stagnant, with a view to state it as the result of the Orders in Council. And Government tacitly acquiesced in the statement, in order to place the fall of tlie ex- changes to the account of a diminished com- merce, rather than to its true cause, a redun- dant paper circulation. I have dwelt too long, and perhaps too mi- nutely, on these statemeirts : but I am most desirous to fix on them the attention of the House, because they may serve to show, how little availing are the efforts of Power to in- terrupt the communications of Countries which have a surplus produce to interchange. Since it appears, that after eight 3'ears of relentless warfare, the unrosmitting vigilance and un- controlled authority of the Lhemy, sometime* 82 seconded by our own efforts*, are wholly in- competent to interrupt the commerce of Na- tions, or even to disturb, in any material de- gree, the level that existed in a year of peace and unrestrained communication. * What I here allude to is the fluctuation of our conduct in granting licences. In former wars the ports in Holland, and the mouths of the Elbe and Weser, were the places to which the Belligerents resorted for the interchange of the produce of their respective countries. When these countries were involved in war, and the violence of the Belligerents no longer permitted neutrals to navigate the seas, each nation was compelled to trade directly with the enemy by licence. But, instead of leaving the market to find its own level, a discrimination has been exercised, a sort of effort has been made to regulate the supply, in almost every article of traffic, as the Board of Trade judged the market to be over or understocked. No one so unjust as to suspect the motive; but the effect has been to preclude all regularity of supply, to induce great fluctuation in prices, and encourage speculations of every description. It has also given a great and unfair advantage to the commerce of the metropolis over the out-ports, whose merchants cannot so speedily become acquainted with the varying resolutions of the Board. When they have applied for licences, they have sometimes been informed that as many licences had already been granted as were deemed sufficient to supply the demand of the market ; or when they have obtained licences and conveyed instructions to their correspondents abroad, they have uniformly found themselves anticipated by the London mer- chants, whose orders had been received several days anterior. Merchants have likewise been induced to expect profit from the varying views of Government rather than from a nice adjustment of supply to demand. No sooner has a large importation takea place from the Baltic or other parts, than all the power of the 83 It only remains to state, in a few words, what mercantile interest is employed to obtain the withholding of further licences for similar goods, in order to raise the price on the consumer, and benefit the importer at the expense of the whole people of England. But what appears to me an absolute co-operation with the views of the enemy, is the late refusal to grant licences for the importation of goods from France and some other parts. The enemy grants no licences for colonial or British produce, and therefore, with a blind spirit of retaliation we say, neither will >ve admit wines and other articles the growth of France. Soto act is consistent with the views of the French Government, which seeks to repress commerce ; but cannot be consistent with our policy, who seek to cherish and extend commerce. For every article imported from the Continent there must be taken from hence some article of correspondent value. Mo Englishman will become a purchaser, but by an article of less value in his estima- tion than the article to be sold ; each individual buyer is therefore a gainer, and the gain of individuals is the gain of the nation. It is answered. True ; but goods are not admitted into France, and the importer of foreign goods will carry away guineas. How long are we to be haunted by this most absurd apprehension ? If guineas are wanted in this country, they will not quit it to go to France, where they are in sufficient abundance ; and if guineas are not wanted in this country, the sooner they quit it the better. If they cannot find their real value in the market, from whatever cause, they will not appear in it ; they will be hoarded, or they will pass to other countries to seek a higher value. If hoarded, they are absolutely unproductive ; if they go abroad, it is either to return with a profit in some other shiipe, or to pay for objects deemed of grfnter value. But what is the situation of the country which is paid for its commodities in guineas ? The individual who carries them away is remunerated by the sale: but the nation to winch he carries tiiem is very little b(;nefitted. By an importation of sugar or cotton, the G 2 84 in my judgment is the remedy adapted to our situation. For the reasons I have adduced, I do not dread the effects of a law directing a re- turn to cash payments at the Bank, after any reasonable interval of time. But 1 do not wish people would have been better fed or better clothed ; but by a return in guineas, unless again sent away to purchase consumable articles, no other effect is produced, than a depreciation in the value of money, and an advance in the prices of commodities similar to what is experienced among ourselves from an increase in the issue of paper. Our guineas, however, are now near an end, as is argued. We have only five millions left, and they cannot last long. In future foreign goods brought hither must therefore be given to us for nothing, or ours must be taken away in exchange. Hence it is evident that the best mode of disposing of our own goods is, to encourage all other nations to bring theirs to our market. The commerce of nations is barter ; they who sell must buy. But, to pursue this system, it is above all things ne- cessary to leave the market to find its own level, by granting Jicences either for exportation or for importation, without any limit or distinction. In times of peace the interference of Go- vernment in the details of commerce is acknowledged to be prejudicial. In times of war, Government has also abstained from interfering as long as the Belligerents have carried on their exchanges circuitously through neutrals. And now when a direct intercourse is allowed under licences, there can be no good reason why Government should assume to itself a more ex- tended interference in the details. Its proper ofBce now as ia peace is to consider what are fit articles of import and export, and, having made known its resolution to the public, it may safely leave to individuals to regulate their commerce by the wants of the community. 85 to urge a remedy which many persons consider as extremely hazardous in its operation. Pro- vided we abstain from all interference with the prices of things ; provided we suffer paper and metallic currencies to find their level in the market, 1 am content to leave the law as it actually stands. I am convinced that it w ill be found sufficient to remedy the existing evils, which have chiefly arisen from our own unsus- pecting confidence. Depreciation is now sen- sibly ftlt. Lord King has afforded an example of resistance to payments made in depreciated currency, and the result of the cases to be judged in Westminster Hall will fully proclaim the old and sacred maxim of our law, that contracts can only be acquitted in the coins of the realm. Men, therefore, will gradually re- quire payment in metallic money, which will bring it back to circulation. A knowledge of the salutary law of the 37th of Geo. III. c. 32, will be disseminated throughout the country. It will be known universally that every private banker is bound to pay his notes of one and two pounds ill money ; and demands will be 86 gradually made upon the issuers of private Bank-notes for the fulfilment of their contracts. Though the amount now in circulation be not less than twelve millions, it would be absurd to suppose that an immediate demand will be made to the same extent. Many notes will be withdrawn from circulation as they return on their issuers. Arrangements and compromises will take place between the issuers and holders of notes in various ways which cannot be enu- merated. Bank of England one and two pound notes will be substituted for a large amount of them. Some may be paid in stand- ard silver, at 5s. 2d. per ounce, conformably to law. A few only will need to be paid in guineas, and a large quantity will actually remain in circulation, whenever it is universally known that a guinea, or its real value, may be had for each note on demand. The whole may thus be brought within due limits, with a less loss to the issuers than the profit derived from these very notes during the last two years. This once effected, our course is smooth and easy. The exchanges will esxperience a very 87 considerable advance ; for depreciation is not only influenced by the amount, but also by the velocity of the circulation. A note for one pound passing rapidly from one individual to another, and becoming the instrument of many payments, influences prices much more than a note for ten pounds, which less frequently changes its possessor. And so far from ne- glecting the consideration of the one and two pound notes, as some have done, when the subject has been examined, I believe them to have conduced more to depreciation than the issue of all other notes. As the exchanges shall be found to mend, the Bank may gradually with- draw from circulation its own one and two pound notes, and subsequently its five-pound notes ; when after a due interval, and the ex- changes being brought to par, and the Mint price and the market price of bullion being equal, the Bank may again resume its cash payments. Nor will it be difficult to take ef- fectual security against the recurrence of si- milar difficulties, by adopting measures to Umit the circulation of paper currency to the payment of great and wholesale transactions, in which alone it is useful. By restraining the issue of Bank-notes for sums under fifteen pounds, and private bankers' notes under ten pounds, metallic money will be the instrument of exchange in all the ordinary retail transac- tions of life. It will therefore bear a due pro-^ portion to the paper currency, and preclude much of the danger that was experienced in 1793 and 1797 fiom alarm. Not oidy will the bankers find much less difficulty in procuring money to discharge their obligations, but tiie demand will be much narrowed by the paper circulation being chiefly in the possession of the higher orders, on whom the influence of panic will operate with much less force than when paper is spread among the lower classes of society. Unless precautions such as these be adopted, my anxiety to return to cash pay- ments will be much abated ; being convinced that if the Bank of England is to be the sole source of cash supply to 700 private banks issuing notes without limitation, it will scarcely be found adequate to furnish their ordinary 89 w^nts, and the first season of adversity and distrust will draw from it all the metal con- tained in its coffers. I confess I see no difficulty in tliis course of measures but what arises from the Exchequer- bills now in the market. It must be the first duty of Parliament, on its meeting to fund a very large part of tiiem, and at the same time pay off fhe last loan of three millions obtained from the Bank, in order to enable the latter to contract its issues, without diminution of com- mercial di counts. The Public will be indem- nified for this payment by the proper use of its own balances. I never could comprehend the policy of maintaining so large a floating debt, liable to return into the Exchequer in payment of revenue at the end of four months, whenever by any untoward event, the interest of money in the market should be higher than that yielded by Exchequer-billh. The object appears to have been to avoid pro\idmg for the interest by taxation, as would have become necessary, had we funded the debt in the 5 p«r 90 cents, which once might have been done nearly at par. Perhaps it would have been more worthy of the wisdom of ParUament to have repealed the letter, than to have evaded the spirit of the law. But our situation no longer admits of alternative, and we must free ourselves, what- ever be the cost, from this imminent danger. In other respects, I think it will be acknow- ledged, that the course I have suggested in- volves neither hazard nor injustice. We shall return to a wholesome state of things by the same steps as we have advanced to our present diseased condition ; and nothing will be demanded of any man, except in conformity with his original contract, the benefit of which has long been enjoyed. Concerning the equity of the holder of a note demanding pay- ment of the issuer in metallic money, there can be no question. But, confining our view to the situation of the Bank and private Bankers, some persons may be of opinion, that the Bank should first resume its cash payments, before private Bankers can be expected to fulfil their engagements. I agree with this 91 opinion as far as regards all notes of £5 and upwards. They were issued when the Bank paid in cash, and private Bankers had a right to demand cash for a Bank of England note as often as cash was demanded from them for one of their own. But it is not so with one and two pound notes ; the private Bankers ac- quired the profitable right to issue them after the stoppage of the Bank, and undertook to pay them in money without reference to any aid derivable from the Bank of England. Be- sides, therefore, the difficulty, nay, the im- possibility of the Bank, immediately on its opening, furnishing cash to all private Bankeris sufficient to pay the enormous amount of the notes emitted, it would not be just to impose on the Bank the burthen of discharging obli- gations contracted when cash payments had ceased. It would be leaving all the benefit with one party, and imposing all the loss on the other. Nor can there exist a doubt, that to leave the Act of the the 37th of Geo. III. c. 32, to its undisturbed operation, which will reduce within due limits the circulation of the 92 one-pound and two-pound notes of private Bankers, is equally conformable to justice and policy. To conclude, I protest against this Bill, be- cause it has a tendency to encourage the cir- culation " of paper-bills of credit, by means " whereof debts will be dischar2:ed with a " much less value than was contracted for, to " the great discouragement and prejudice of " the trade and commerce of His Majesty's " subjects, by occasioning confusion in deal- " ings, and lessening credit in the realm ;" and because the existing laws, duly understood and enforced, are sufficient in themselves to restrain the further progress of the existing evil, and to bring us back to the only just measure of value — a metallic circulation. APPENDIX. 9 July, 1811. A BILL, intituled. An Act for making more effectual Provision for preventing the current Gold Coin of the Realm from being paid or accepted for a greater Value than the current Value of such Coin ; far preventing any Note or Notes of the Gavernor and Company of the Bank of England from being re- ceived for any smaller Sum than the Sum therein specified ; and for staying Proceedings upon any Distress by Tender of such Notes, WHEREAS it is expedient to enact, as is hereinafter pro- vided : Be it enacted by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament aisembled, and by the Authority of the same, That, from and after the passing of this Act, no Person shall receive or pay for any Gold Coin lawfully current within the Realm, any more in Value, Benefit, Profit or Advantage than the true lawful Value of such Coin, whether such Value, Ben«'fit, Profit or Advantage be paid, made, or taken in lawful Money, or in any Note or Notes, Bill or Bills of the Governor and Company of the Bank of Englandt or in any Silver Token orTokens issued by the said Governor and Company, or by any or all of the stiid means wholly or partly, or by any other means, device, shift or contrivance whatsoever. And be it further enacted by the Authority albre^aid, That no Person shall bv anv means, device, sliift or contrivance what- 94 APPENDIX. soever, receive or pay any Note or Notes, Bill or Bills of the Governor and Company of the Bank of England, as of less Value in Money, except lawful Discount, than the Sum ex- pressed therein, to be thereby made so payable. And be it enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That in case any Person shall proceed by Distress to recover from any Tenant or other Person liable to such Distress, any Rent or Sum of Money due from such Tenant or other Person, it shall be lawful for such Tenant or other Person, in every such case, to tender Notes of the Governor and Company of the Bank of £ng/and, expressed to be payable on demand, to the Amount of such Rent or Sum so due, either alone or together with a sufficient Sum of lawful Money, to the Person on whose behalf such Distress is made, or to the Officer or Persou making such Distress on his behalf ; and in case such Tender shall be ac- cepted, or in case such Tender shall be made and refused, the Goods taken in such Distress shall be forthwith returned to the Party distrained upon, unless the Party distraining and re- fusing to accept such Tender, shall insist that a greater Sum is due than the Sum so tendered, and in such case the Parties shall proceed as usual in such cases ; but if it shall appear that no more was due than the Sum so tendered, then the Party who tendered such Sum shall be entitled to the Costs of all sub- sequent Proceedings ; Provided always, that the Pei'son to whom such Rent or Sum of Money is due, shall have and be entitled to all such other Remedies for the Recovery thereof, exclusive of Distress, as such Person had or was entitled to at the time of making such Distress, if such Person shall not think proper to accept such Tender so made as aforesaid : Provided also, that nothing herein contained shall affect the Right of any Tenant, or other such Person as aforesaid having Right, to replevy the Goods so taken in Distress, in case, without making such Tender as aforesaid, he shall so think fit. Provided always, That nothing in this Act contained shall ex- tend to Ireland. Provided always, and be it further Enacted, That this Act shall continue and be in force to and until the Twenty-fifth day of March one thousand eight hundred and twelve, and no longer. APPENDIX. 95 Aimo quarto Georgii III. Regis. CAP. XXXIV. An Act to prevent Paper Bills of Credit^ hereafter to be issued in any of His Majesty^ s Colonies or Plan- tations in America^ from being declared to be a legal Tender in Payments of Money; and to pre- vent the legal Tender of such Bills as are now subsisting, from being prolonged beyond the Periods limited for calling in and sinking the same. WHEREAS great Quantities of Paper Bills of Credit have been created and issued in His Majesty's Colonies or Plantations in America, by virtue of Acts, Orders, Resolutions, or Notes of Assembly, making and declaring such Bills of Credit to be legal Tender in Payments of Money : And whereas such Bills of Credit have greatly depreciated in their Value, by Means whereof Debts have been discharged with a much less Value than was contracted for, to the great Discouragement and Prejudice of the Trade and Commerce of His Majesty's Subjects, by occa- sioning Confusion in Dealings, and lessening Credit in the said Colonies or Plantations : For Remedy whereof. May it please your most Excellent Majesty, that it may be enacted; and be it enacted by the King's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same. That from and after the first Day of September, one thousand seven hundred and sixty four, no Act, Order, Resolution, or Note of Assembly, in any of His Majesty's Colonies or Plantations in America, shall be made, for creating or issuing any Paper Bills, or Bills of Credit of any Kind or Denomination whatsoever, declaring such Paper Bills, or BiJls of Credit, lo be legal Tender in Payment of any Bargains, Contracts, Debts, Dues, or Demands whatsoever ; and every Clause or Provision which shall hereafter be inserted in any Act, Order, Resolution, or Note of Assembly, contrary to this Act, •hall be null and void. 2)i APPENDIX. And Whereas the great Quantities of Paper Bills, or Bills of Credit, which are now actually in Cii< iiialion and Currency in several Colonies or Plantations in /i;7Jt;i''a. tnitted in pursuance ot Acts of Assenibi) declarinj^ such Bit: a legal 1 ender, make it highly expedient that the Coi ditiosji. and Term>>, upon which such Bills have been emitted, should not he varied or prolonged, so as to continue the legal Tender thereof beyoud the Terms respectively fixed by such Acts for calling in and discharging such Bill ; be it therefore enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That every Act, Order, Resolution, or Note of Assembly, in any of the said Colonies or Plantations, which shall be made to prolong the legal Tender of any Paper Bills, or Bills of Credit,, which are now vubsisting and current in any of the said Colonies or Plantations in America, beyond the Times fixed for the calling in, ttinking, and discharging of such Paper Bills, or Bills of Credit, shall be null and void. And be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid. That if any Governor or Commander in Chief for the time being, in all or any of the said Colonies or Plantations, shall, from and after the said first Day of September, one thousand seven hun- dred and sixty-four, give his Assent to any Act or Order of Assembly contrary to the true Intent and Meaning of this Act, every such Governor or Commander in Chief shall, for every *uch Offence, forfeit and pay the Sum of one thousand Pounds, and shall be immediately dismissed from his Government, and for ever after rendered incapable of any public Office or Place of Trust. Provided always. That nothing in this Act shall extend to alter or repeal an Act passed in the Twenty-fourth Year of the Reign of his late Majesty King George the Second, intituled, ** An Act to regulate and restrain Paper Bills of Credit in His Majesty's Coloniesor Plantations o( Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, and Massachuaets Bay, and Nex» Hampshire, in America, and to prevent the same being legal Tenders in Payments of Money." Provided also, That nothing herein contained shall extend, or be construed to exteiid, to make any of the Bills now sub- sisting in any ©f the said Colonies a legal Tender, APPENDTX. 97 CAP. XXXII. An Act to suspend, fur a limited TimCy the Operation of Two Acts of the Fifteenth and Seventeenth Years of the Reign of His present jMaJesti/i for re- strainif/g the Negociation of Promissory Notes, and Inland Bills of Exchange, under a limited Sum, within that Part of Great Britain called England. [lOtk March, 1797> and prolonged by subsequent Statutes.] WHEREAS an Act of Parliament was passed in the Fifteenth Year of the Reign of his present Majesty, intituled, " An Act to restrain the Negociation of Promissory Notes, and Inland Bills of Exchange, under a limited Sum, within that Part of Great Britain called England:^' And whereas anqtfi^r Act w^s passed in the Seventeenth Year of the Reign of his present Majesty, intituled, " An Act for further restraining the Negociation of Promissory Notes, and Inland Bills of Exchange, under a limited Sum, >vithin that part of Great Britain called England:'''' And >vbereas it is expedient that the said Acts should be suspended for a certain Time, so far as the same may i-elate to any Notes, Draughts, or Undertakings, made payable on Demand ; Be it therefore enacted by the King's most Ex- cellent Majesty, by and with the Advice ^nd Consent of the I^ords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in t^is present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same. That the said recited Acts, so far as the same relate to the making yoid of Promissory Notes, or Draughts, qr Undertakings in Writing, payable on Demand tp the Bearer thereof, for any Sum of Money less than the Sum of Five Pounds in the Whole; and also to restrain the publishing or uttering and negociating of any such Notes, Draughts, or Undertakings as aforesaid* shall, from and after the Second Day of March, One thousand seven hundred and ninety-seven, be, and the same is hereby declared to be, to all Intents and Purposes, suspended until tjhe First Day of May next. II. Provided always, and be it further enacted, Tha^ this Acl H 98 APPENDIX. maybe altered, varied, or repealed, by any Act or Acts to be made in this present Session of Parliament. III. And be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid, That if any Person liable to the Payment of any of such Notes, Draughts, or Undertakings in Writing, as may be issued in pursuance of this Act, shall neglect or fail to make full Pay- ment in Money of the Sum or Sums for which such Notes, Draughts, or Undertakings in Writing, shall be respectively given or issued, or so much thereof as shall be or remain due thereon respectively, by the Space of Seven Days after Demand thereof made by the Holder or Holders of such Notes, Draughts, or Undertakings in Writing, it shall and may be lawful for any One or more of His Majesty's Justices of the Peace for the County, Riding, City, Division, or Place, where the Person or Persons respecively so refusing to pay any of such Notes, Draughts, or Undertakings in Writing, as last aforesaid, shall or may happen to be or reside ; and such Justice or Justices is or are hereby required, upon Complaint made by the Holder or Holders thereof, to summon the Person or Persons against whom such Complaint shall be made, and after his, her, or their Appearance, or in Default thereof, upon due Proof upon Oath (and which Oath such Justice or Justices is or are hereby em- powered to administer) of such Summons or Warning having been given, such Justice or Justices shall proceed to hear and determine the said Complaint, and award such Sum to be paid by the Person or Persons respectively liable to the Pay- ment of every such Note, Draught, or Undertaking in Writing, to the Holder or Holders thereof, as shall appear to such Justice or Justices to be due thereon, together with such a Sum for "Costs, not exceeding the Sum of Twenty Shillings, as to such Justice or Justices shall seem meet ; and if any Person or Persons shall refuse or neglect to pay or satisfy such Sum of Money as upon such Complaint as aforesaid ^hall be adjudged, upon the same being demanded, such Justice or Justices shall, by Warrant under his or their Hand and Seal, or Hands and Seals, cause the same to be levied by Distress and Sale of the Goods of the Party so neglecting or refusing as aforesaid, to- gether with all Costs and Charges attending such Distress and Sdle, returning the Overplus, if any, to the Owner. APPENDIX. 9^ AN ACCOUNT of the VALUE of all IMPORTS into, and of all EXPORTS from, Great Britain, for Three Years, ending the 5th January, 1811 ; distmguishin'j; each Year; and distinguishing the Value of imports tVoui the East In dies and CiiiNA, from the Value of all other Itnpo ts : — Al>o, dis- tinguishing the Value of British Produce and Maii«it'actures Exported, from th(; Value of Foreign "Articles Exported; to- gether with theDitference between the Official Value and the Declared Value of British Produce and Manufactures, ex- ported in the Year ending the 5th January, 1811. Year ending 5th ) January, 1806' \ 1807.. 1808.. 1809.- 1810.. , 1811.. OFFICIAL VALUE Ol IMPORTS. From Europe, A- tVica, and America. 24,272,468 25,089,136 25,406,330 23,780,704 30,409,384 36,422,142 From East Indies and China. 6,072,160 3,746,771 5,848,649 3,363,025 OFFICIAL VALUE OF EXPORTS. Foreign aud Colonial -Meribandis*^ £. 9,950,508 9,124,499 9,395,283 7,862,305 15,182,768 10,945,309 ^ British Produce and Manu- factiires. -25,004,337 27,402,685 25,190,762 26,691,962 35,104,132 34,940,550 Xote.—The Value of British Produce and Manu- J factures Exported, computed at theave-f z,^- x7ftorc rage Market Prices, was, in ihe Vear^ •'*'*"'*'^^^ eadiiig ith January, 1808 - - - - ) Ditto ditto intheYear ending 5th Jan. 1811 49,975,614 H2 100 APPENDIX. OFFICIAL VALUE of IMPORTS into GREAT BRITAIN, from Europe, Africa, and America. Annotto Almonds Ashes, Pearl and Pot.. Barilla Bark, Oak Berries, Juniper Brimstone Bristles, Undvest Butter & Cheese (Foreign) C«rhii)«al Cocoa Coffee Copper, Unwrought . . . Cork Corn, Grain and Meal . Cortex Peruvianus Currants Elephants' Teeth Fea(hers for Beds Figs Fish, Cod and Herrings . Flax, Rough Gum Arabic and Senegal HatSf Chip and Straw . Hemp, Rough Hides, ^aw and Tanned . Jalap.. Indigo Iron, Bar Isinglass Lace, Thread, and Silk . Lemons and Oranges . . . Linens ( Foreign) Cambricks I I Canva«, Hesseiit, & Spruce Germany, plain Russia, plain ., Madder and Madder Root)- Oil, Olive, Ordinary . —————Salad - ' Train Pimento . . ; Pitch and Tar Quicksilver Raisins Salt YEARS ending 5th January, 1806. 8,694 8,329 112,480 75,508 34,164 86,660 26,24 24,795 258,-220 82,326 94,169 2,322,952 50,125 32,400 1,694,453 64,362 135,349 10,900 18,389 5,325 48,904 913,304 26,233 10,058 513,365 369,764 1 00,6s 266,519 15,33ll 66,929 32,697 30,982 57,362 »73,731 104,840 251,091* 52,164 4,783 347,002 14,394 142,433 107,334 I "4,8/ 7 £. 48,49» 19,196 460,433 175,50a 8,93S 30 178 44,229 20,998 138,608 189,828 61,496 5,307,113 92,129 78,788 2,701,228 93,70s 130,831 19,336 17,735 5,834 126,878 945,223 59,729 20,576 45,31 132,940 117,512 97,621 81,087 2,9/8 330,828 54,878 150,820 110,061 72,838 APPENDIX, I*t OFFICIAL VALUE of IMPORTS into GREAT BRITAIN, from Europe, Africa, and America. YEARS ending stb January, ^eeds. Clover — — — Fbx and Linseed Shuuiack Silk, Raw and Thrown Skins and Furs Smelts Spirit;^, Bidndy — — Geneva , Rum Succus Liquoritise Sujrar Tallow Tobacco Turpentine Wax, Bees XVhalefins Wines I . Canary — — Fnnch . Madeira ■ Portugal — . Spanish ^ Balks and Ufers . . . j Deals and Deal Ends I Fir Timber . 1 Fustic "© / Logwood •2. \ Mahofijanv " \ Masts' . .". I Oak Plank & Timber I Redwood v. Staves Wool, Cotton » ■ Sheep's Yarn, Linen, Raw Other Articles Foreign and Colonial > ^ Produce "• • • > IRISH Produce Manufactures . and Total, exclusive of I portatiuns from East Indies and China [mO last > 102 APPENDIX. •h^ O) ,-c ->/ m p- - OP -^. o C «i- --^. o -^ cr. -i t^ ^/-o q 'i^ — .or G-) t'^_^ (-^ — ^ JU3 5 o- t . cr. rj. U-. — in o» - o o — •<* o eg >* ^C »o m c OJ 00 t^ r^ joj 'Bniq3 pue Ripuj luo.ij s^.iodnil }o :^uno3.')V aifj. ci in 'vO O? CO C CO ■* CTi CTl ©? O CT; (« j>t^ CTiqinr--Oi-<»nTj>Q0i— I,, ._. _ ,. n »o in ' -^ 1— t>~ t>» O t> O ■* M <« . 00 in o) — , in m o Qj ©J o»c- cr-*c?«ncr>cr'^cs^oe»iecN.en 1 «n oD o) 8 C>-Cr) eg •jO ,C — cr. X^«£ic:tv.(N enroot--'* • cn CO 00 ctj CLjintcoo o'vo".-<«^ -^cfito©?^ »n en <^ 00 ■* »n r-. ■* I^ — ■^5 »- T}. t^ - « ^' ,^^ (CtU .=J^ = ^ APPENDIX. 103 ^ TJ • s ^ u s Q a> S5 •5 00 H fee « H 1 > g > fc o -o » a> J", CIS ^ ir? u s O 00 <5l — e en S! 'p V O s > B s n> .c en >• 3 04 m V 1 •n "1„ rt fi n W »H B ■!-> |B5 tn "^ 1 5 3 » Q 2 U U rr t*- S! cr ""• Uj ^ S', > o 1 i 01 is 1/ CO < Q, s u 01 J3 O o ;2; 1 s o 1 s c a u> Si 2 CO o -o a o o u j= rt < # t^ r> -* CO -H uV ^o ^ ^ ^ O -* 00 '^ Tf O o — oo 0* ^3 00 s o» l-~ Ot 00 o* 00 ^ ifj b. — ' — O to — eo yD c -- oo •0 O lO OJ o a. la er> (N — c:, CT) in ■^ If) O^ ^ o d o? -4" C^, cr2 — 00 •* 00 Tf m o^ tj< O 'O G^ o^ o CO oo 00 ^ c^ C^ — 00 lO ;£) ^ r^ C 'O 00 o< eo O vO O ■-£) CO CO Tf — O ■<' — -*'* — t^ CTi t^ -^ O O) 00 ^ t-> -« -^ O lA O rf CO of ^ 164 a!>pendix. OFFICIAL VALUE of Foreign and Colonial Merchandibe exported. Annotto Ashes Barilla Brimstone Cassia Ligiiea Cinnamon Cloves Cochineal Cocoa < Cod-fisli Coffee .......; Corn, Grain, Flour & Rice Cortex Peruvianus Currants and Raisins . . . . Fish, Cod and Herrings . . Gum Shellac Hemp and Flax. Hides, raw and tanned Jalap Indigo Iron, Bar Linens, foreign ; . . Mace ; Nutmegs ...........;.. Pepper Piece Goods of India .... Pimento Quirksilver Raisins Salt Saltpetre . . . , Silk, Raw and Thrown. . . . Skins and Furs, .....;... Spices ......; Spirits, Brandy & Geneva Rikm . . ; . . i . . . I . . Sugar ; ■ Tea Tobacco i .. Wines French . . Portugal — — . — Spanish, &c Wood, Logwood Mahogany Wo«)ds for Dying Wool, Cotton Other Articles Foreign and Colonial ] Produce.... . . , Irish Produce & Manu- ', factures i total . Years ending the 5!h January, £. 10,227 20,620 74,650 36,772 30,394 108,344 44,5S1 9,471,608 33,07& 24,r.91 19,232 47,777 373,860 55,101 99,965 7,922 8,080 83,630 i,8.'5 1,025 24,201 70,402 9,203 64,27 100,426 85,80/ 112,104 253,979 1,060,409 599,926 194,545 77,009 36,25 30,090 54,660 13, 41.376 1,302,72. 9,552,483 398,08 9,950,508 jL. 9,031 13,97'-' 7>,7t>l 24.295 51,765 39,482 63,257 3,027,259 12,797 16,570 03,560 34,745 574,1130 61,724 n9,'95 2,145 1,2^8 103,7/1 J, 21 6,65 H 46,592 190,051 18,72- 36,383 90,732 59,141 188,175 293,404 688,40:J 514,842 162,105 276,982 4 4,640 77,762 39,954 18,905 26,482 548,6,3' ,789,368 335,131 9,124,499 1808. £. 2,939 14,976 8)«,43.i 28,155 57,45i!. 79,582 117,563 3,143,116 52,8 5,434 24,686 20,458 411,639 85,41 142,47 728 1,748 57,18 742,389 39,996 55,174 4,024 36,374 107,724 34,535 204,963 210,575 1,538,735 609,771 175,961 2/8,133 29,067 85,035 31,166 9,59 77,559 500,394 9.105,961 289,322 9,395,283 I8O9. £. 3,671 17.127 8,951 4,065 4,068 147,^30 57.377 1,847,920 51,397 44,780 1,581 320,144 9991 15 256 2,469 32:3,107 86231 118,578 55,201 822,345 15,926 17,819 31,263 33,673 55,264 5,261 128,5/9 252,630 334,339 783,963 714,939 123,999 455,265 48,840 60,283 382,6/0 7,397.901 464,404 7,862,305 1810. £■ 7,931 21,003 3,c65 I,84(: 13,741 73,341 244,254 5,845, 160 35,911 92,377 35,217 198,870 60,035 109,1 5,319 636,807 112,551 604,424 190,131 1,179,728 50,119 11,75 39,555 13,200 85,960 48,646 192,620 271,647 606,174 1,713,130 703,724 202,430 626,649 139,752 156,215 448,096 14,680,524 502,244 15,182,768 10,470,966 474,343 10,945,309 APPENDIX. 105 t)FFICIAL VALUE of British Produce and Manufactures exporter: from Grkat Britain. Apparel Baik, Tanners Bet.- Brass, wrought Brass and Copper Cuhinet & Uphor>'. Wares Coils Colours for Painters . . . . Copp* r, wrought Cordage Corn a«d Flour Cotton ^Manufactures . . . . Twist and Yarn .. Fish Cilass and Eitrtheiiware . . Ciunpowder Guns Haberdas-hery ..v Hats Hops Iron and Steel Lead and Shot Leather Linens ^lelasses . • • Musical Instruments — • Oil, Train Plate, Plated VVare,&c. .. Piovlsitms Salt Silks Soap and Candles Stationary Sujjar, refined Till and Pewter Woollens Other Articles Yeai-s ending .0th January, 1306. 143,609 44,226 63,941 94,CU6 52->,014 111,707 319,094 s,77i,27l 1,086,176 163,872 20O,09H 64,300 240,016 86,496 1,253,490 9".2,17'i 145,375 056,943 76,700 Total ioa,039 122,681 27^,599 auo.Uit* 69,406 100,908 l,U4,79 347,689 6,005,540 2,520,713 1307 £. 199,0 a; 42,447 66,186 71,144 557,515 160,332 249,054 9,896,616 854,429 136,124 231,938 81,986 315,516 75,477 1,532,793 105,36s 210,163 800,493 7tt,787 60,266 133,540 248,59(1 218,423 113,835 144,9-,4 1.199774 270, 04S 6,247,72; 3,107,624 27,402,6135 £. 215,752 46,94] 6,3, 44S 53,160 494,227 146,433 358,239 9,867,448 669,928 125,614 212,23/ 64,6;o 247,086 97,8y-« 1,394,966 97.tJ-it* l79.'-26(i 765,999 13,13( 34,573 101,421 277,883 202,248 78,010 11937V 1,203,66J 306,338 5,372,OB9 2.380,067 ,190,76: I8O9. £. 250,559 50,735 65,001 354,607 64,122 526,84 129,265 32.621 134,055 12,835,803 575,0 118,843 183,643 33,428 49.6B9 51.436 261,112 124,346 1,176,524 81,801 191.47 874,460 33,556 26,025 122,066 154,294 201,669 ias,775 89,528 145,824 948,304 C:44,142 4,853.999 1,576,324 26,691,962 £ 259,835 45,151 65,727 403.429 78,9 405,634 196,913 46,335 70,541 IS. 634 614 1,097,536 142„593 240,123 32,417 30,480 55,9 »6 335,941 97,1 &6 1,391,76 63,27 s 179.94 1,157,030 *>,97) 52,499 140,73 139,132 268,258 190,17; 129,70s 169 36< l.3i6 76f, 232, 83;- 5,4l6,14C 1,9-25,091 35,104,13. £. ?39,86s 4i,99( 72,493 356577 93 l6.i 51)9 991 187047 63,052 44,152 13,041,633 1,075,137 134,296 036,314 31,300 49,604 64,797 327,884 52,452 1,577.462 101,993 186,573 1,015,240 51. 558 54,779 164.16c 125.249 296,759 188.023 120,353 213,176 l,220,49g 256 581 5.773.214 1.9:4.127 14,9tO,5S« 106 APPENDIX. t s ^ 2 B 3 ;j; ^ 0) ,c 3 5 -g O I c 3 t. O ■l) fl •< bn S 'Z 3 ^ ^ •- «*- -r Hi cq y - . n »r> o O^ rr ^ cc <» „ ^ tr; o e <^ t^ a ©* 00 H in en a, » s — CO 3^. e •>* 00 O? — - 00 (N — en eo ir» 05 — en c O) ^ .- »o t£5 t^ 00 crs O o O o o o 00 00 00 00 00 00 APPENDIX. m e6 H ■< o g S > o -a ». be SS = c "C Id 2 O O »^ a, • m! C» Ci « Cn lo. •r> 00 tX5 ^ eo fc o W 2 C co" 0-. i — ^ 00 €0 00 ex; ic t^ GJ Tf^ c -* '•5. o> iO 00 ' -" "-! - . h-' b i:: «3 , t^ "i — 00 I t^ O "^ r; to in" a D cn ^ 00 o ) Ti 1— ' ^ O^ o c -f- ifi d o" oo" cnT c 5 6 c CO oo o vfS t}< «■ ^ Oi t^ - -* ■<*' -<*• cr. f ^ e^ S 00 lO •— •* '. -^. o ^ ^^ c£ of c ^ ^ 00 00 CTi C "\ o >* CO eo" Tf 'O' lO Tf ir ^ --«^ ^^'-^ i I ^ •■-HO •> . 1 L. > . .= 5 o c «) i;3i L>f the abo f the Freig c Value of Imports as sold to the Consi luding Mercantile Profit to the Imp exclusive of Duties : — Also, includi iights, great Part of which are p tish Siihiprts .« Gree c. . . . ritish s favo •3 pq 1 V IS S p t. TheValue of theNewfouudland, and Southern Whale Fisheries, & i. The Surplus of Imports from B nies and Plantations, considered a Balance =1 Value of Imports (exclusive < [itioned Deductions) \'alue of Exports (exclusive o wards^ 1 o o 3 J u 1 la^li 1 ill vi S S « tf {^ 108 APPENDIX. 0<3 d w 1 O CO m CO o o t^ S. ^ 2 ". ^ c^ in d CO t^ c>> in 1^ o T}« ^5 i-^ t^ in t- to CO 00 d »-' i CO in 1 o in ©} OJ in c^ t^ t^ -^J* OJ 1 -* in •* oc <>) °° . O tC CTi oi eo 2 Co 00 O to CO CO 2 ^ OJ in ?5 m o^ ! - " " "" o to eo o CO t^ . -tj^ •it^ oo CO in cy> 00 ' to -* Tj^ t^ QO »ni8S0ry Notes stamped in England during the YeJvs ending lO"' October, 1805, 180(>, 1807, 1808, 1809, and 1810. Number of Stamps. Du ty. Sum for which each Promissory Note is issu- able, not exceeding Amount in Circu- lation, supposing each Note to have been issued for the argestSum allow- ed by the Law. Amount su pposed to be in actual Circulation. 1805. 2,905,600 32,000 s. d. 3 6 9 1 2 s. 1 2 5 3,050,880 67,200 4,323,196 6,052,000 2,905,600 64,000 823,466 302,600 5 20 4,117,330 3,026,000 4,063,666 13,493,276 10,112,930 1806. 2,810,000 66,120 832,935 323,100 s. I d. 3 6 9 £. 1 2 5 20 s. 1 2 5 2,950,500 138,352 4,372,908 6,462,000 2,810,000 132,240 4,164,665 3,231,000 4,032,155 13,923,760 10,337,905 1807. 2,146,142 60,789 483,102 144,039 s. 1 d. i 6 9 £. 1 2 5 20 s. 1 2 5 2.253,449 127,656 2,536,285 2,880,780 2,146,142 121,578 2,415,510 1,440,390 2,834,072 7,798,170 6,123,620 18 .8. 1,892.928 78,393 667,0/1 262,' 5;) s. 1 (/. 3 6 9 £. 2 5 20 s. 2 5 1,987,574 164,625 3,502,122 5,253,180 1,892,928 156,786 3,335,355 2,626,590 2 901,051 10,907,501 8,011,659 1809. 5,982.031 208,844 980,974 402,784 s- 1 1 d. 4 8 6 £. 1 2 5 20 5. 2 5 6,281,132 433,572 5,150.113 8 055,6l>0 5,982,031 417,688 4,904,870 4,027,840 7 574. (33 19,925,497 15,332,429 IbiO. ,. 3,318.874 115 336 728J«1 24 -,663 A'. 1 1 d. 4 8 6 £. 1 2 5 20 A' 1 2 5 3,484,817 242.205 3 822,950 4,853,200 3,318,874 230,672 3,640,905 2,426,630 4,405,054 12,403,232 9,617,081 APPENDIX. Hi ABSTRACT of Sir George Shuckburgh Evelyn's Tables, showing the Valae of i>luney iroiu the Norman Conquest. The prices for the year 1550 are taken for the integer, viz. 100. Year of our Lord. Depreciation of Money, according to the Price of Mean Appre- ciation by Interpolation. Wheat 12 Miscel- laneous Arti- cles. Meat. Day Labour Mean of all. A. D. 1050 1100 1150 12(;0 1250 1300 1350 1 400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 .675 1700 1720 1740 1/50 1760 17/0 1780 i790 17L5 1800/ 26 34 43 - 51 60 68 77 83 88 94 100 144 188 210 238 .57 287 314 342 ^)84 427 496 531 562 1050 10 42 26 1150 1250 1350 100 56 75 77 1450 1550 100 100 100 100 100 1600 1625 1650 1675 246 239 I6G 188 210 1700 1720 1740 197 434 266 230 287 1760 203 1 49: 400 275 342 1780 1795 426 752 511 436 531 1 earl) 1 EnRA TA Page 8, Line 21, and 22, for Assizes read Term. 23, .... 1, put in the beginning the the which is at the end of the line; this mistake has occurred only in s^ small part of the impression. I^rinted byW CtOTTM, Nwthumberlancl-cgurt) Straud, Loudvn. mmm «ii I^M l.PrS