^^K rA& vmz wm }■&& ml II B RARY OF THE U N IVERSITY Of ILLINOIS THE MAAMTRASNA MASSACRE. wjjmjfmeni of \\t %xmh BY T. HARRINGTON, M.P. ( With Appendix containing Report of Trials and Correspondence between Most Rev. Dr. M'Evilly and the Lord Lieutenant.) DUBLIN : NATION OFFICE, 70 MIDDLE ABBEY STREET. 1884. vf INTRODUCTION Maamtrasna, the scene of the barbarous murder, whose strange history is treated of in the following chapters, is situated in the County of Galway, at the head of a rugged glen, running up from one of the inlets of Lough Mask. On the night of August 17th, 1882, a party of men broke into a house in this village, occupied by a man named John Joyce, murdered him, his mother, wife, and a young daughter, and inflicted upon his two sons, the only other occupants of the house, injuries so severe, that one of them died on the following day, while the second lay for some time in a precarious condition. Acting on the information of two brothers named Anthony and John Joyce, the police arrested, on the 20th, ten men, all of whom resided at a considerable distance from the scene of the murder — some at a distance of seven miles. The story related ^ by those two brothers, supported by the son of one of them, was of so extraordinary a character that no one but the Crown officials seemed to credit it, and the suspicion very generally prevailed that the brothers Joyce had themselves more to do with the murder than the men they accused. However, after the customary remands and inquiries, the ten men were duly returned for trial at the Galway Assizes. The " Prevention of Crimes Act " being in force at the time, the Crown availed of its provisions to have the venue changed to the City of Dublin, though there was no suggestion in the evidence of the witnesses, and nothing in the circumstances of the case to warrant the belief that the murder was of an agrarian character. IV. Some days previous to the trial, which commenced on 13th November, 1882, before a Special Jury of the City and County of Dublin, in Green Street Courthouse, it became known that Anthony Philbin, one of the accused, had become approver, and would be produced by the Crown to corroborate the three Joyces. It is needless to say that such an announcement caused a complete change in the public feeling with regard to the story related by these witnesses, and every- thing in their evidence which had appeared absurd or incredible was forgotton in view of the declaration by one of the accused, that he was a participator in the horrible tragedy and could corroborate their testimony. On the first day of the trial another of the accused offered his services to the Crown and was accepted. Portion of the revelations and arguments which the reader will meet with in these pages goes to prove that the first of the two approvers knew nothing of the murder, and was terrified into corroborating upon oath, a story which, even with regard to himself, was absolutely false ; and that the second, Thomas Casey, though an actual participator in the murder, and willing as well as able to testify the truth, yet had no other means open to him to save his wretched life except by corroboration and perjury. Applications on the part of prisoners' counsel for postponement, and for what is known as a li view jury," were refused. The juries were packed after the manner of all political and agrarian trials in Ireland. Eight minutes' deliberation sufficed to satisfy the mind and consciences of the first jury, and Patrick Joyce was adjudged guilty and sentenced to death. Patrick Casey was then immediately put upon his trial on the same evidence, and the jury gave 12 minutes' consideration to /"\ V. his fate. The learned judge, when passing sentence of death upon him, used the following words : — " But the " evidence has established clearly and conclusively, and " so as not to leave a doubt of your guilt upon the u mind of any sane person who has heard or read that " evidence, that you not only murdered Brigid Joyce, "but four other persons on that one occasion." No sooner was he cleared out of the dock than a third prisoner, Myles Joyce, was ushered in to be tried, on the same evidence, and before jurors who were in court listening to the judge's characterization of it. Six minutes' retirement satisfied the jury, and his death also was decreed. The fate of the three decided the issue for the re- mainder. Overtures were made to them to plead guilty on promise of escaping capital punishment. Some refused stoutly, and still protested they knew nothing of the murder. But their clergyman was called in, and he, by pointing out to them that if they were innocent their vindication might come in good time, induced them to accept the terms held out to them. The next episode in the ghastly drama was the exe- cution, at Gal way Jail, of the three men w T ho had been found guilty. A day or two before the execution two of the condemned sent, by direction of their spiritual adviser, for a magistrate, and made before him dying declarations, wherein each admitted his own guilt, and both protested that the third man, Myles Joyce, was in- nocent of the murder. The Lord Lieutenant disregarded these declarations, and on the 15th December, 1882, the three men were brought forth together to execution. The scene was a painful and a shocking one. Two men walked calmly to their fate, but the third, Myles Joyce, turned to ; VI. every official of the jail he met, as he passed to the scaffold, and, with all the fiery vehemence of the Celt, declared, in a language which nearly all those who sur- rounded him were strangers to, that (e he was innocent. He feared not to die. But he felt the indignity of being put to death as a murderer." The scene on the scaffold itself was shocking beyond description. Even with the cap drawn over his eyes, and the executioner standing, rope in hand, to hurl the three wretched men together into eternity, Myles Joyce still declared his innocence ; and, as if eager that his very last breath on earth should be a protestation to that God whom he was so soon to meet, he turned again in the direction of the few by- standers, and "* called God to witness that he knew no more of the murder than the child unborn ;" and with that solemn declaration on his lips he sunk from view. His last effort had somewhat displaced the arrangements of the executioner. The rope caught in the wretched man's arm, and for some seconds it was seen being jerked and tugged in the writhing of his last agony. The grim hangman cast an angry glance into the pit, and then, hissing an obscene oath at the struggling victim, sat on the beam, and kicked him into eternity. It is needless to say that the publication of these harrowing particulars would, in themselves, have produced a sensation, but the fact which chiefly seized upon the public mind in Ireland was the declaration of innocence made by the man in his dying moments, and the public conscience already felt ill at ease as to the justice of the act that had been done. At this time the fact that the other two men made dying declarations regarding him had not leaked out beyond the confines of the jail. Soon, however, the writer of these lines became aware of it, and asked a Vll. question upon the subject in the House of Commons. The reply of the Chief Secretary was evasive, beyond admitting that the depositions had been made. Again and again a question as to the contents of these docu- ments was repeated in one form or, another, but Mr. Trevelyan steadily refused to give any information, and the Prime Minister when finally appealed to only availed of the question as an occasion to pay a compliment to the " discretion and clemency with which he knew his noble friend Earl Spencer discharged his duties." But yet the depositions which might be supposed to l)e the best testimony to the noble earl's discretion, &e., were denied to Parliament and the public. The denial of them strengthened suspicions already entertained, and gradually the feeling spread that Myles Joyce's death was a " judicial murder," and it was so characterised in Parliament by the present writer and others during the Session of 1883. The witnesses who gave evidence for the Crown have been all living in the locality since tKe trial under the protection of police. In the month of July last it was noticed that Thomas Casey, one of the approvers, had presented himself at the confessional in the church of the parish to which he belongs, and the fact was of course regarded as significant, inasmuch as it was known that none of the other witnesses had ever presented them- selves for Sacraments since the murder. On the 8th August His Grace the Archbishop of Tuam visited the parish on his annual confirmation tour. Casey sought an interview with His Grace, and informed him of his desire to make reparation by a public confession for the double crime of murder and perjury committed by him in connection with the Maamtrasna trials. The re- velations made by him before the archbishop, priests and Vlll. congregation assembled in the church were immediately brought under the notice of Parliament, and a promise was extracted from the Marquis of Hartington that if they were brought officially before the Government by the Most Eev. Dr. M'Evilly an inquiry would be in- stituted. Philbin, the other approver, reluctantly confessed to the truth of Casey's revelations. His Grace, the Most Rev. Dr. M'Evilly brought the facts under the notice of the Lord Lieutenant, and re- quested an inquiry. Earl Spencer replied by a memo- randum (to be found in the annexed Appendix), prepared evidently by the incriminated officials, and endeavouring to show that there were no grounds for suspicion, and no need of inquiry. This reply did not meet the case, and His Grace again pointed out the necessity for satisfying the public mind with an impartial inquiry. To this communication Earl Spencer directed a curt refusal "to re-open the subject. " Such, briefly, is a history of the events which led to the preparation of the following chapters. If they do not obviate inquiry on the part of Earl Spencer or the Government; it is hoped at least they will help the public to see some of the ugly facts which an inquiry would serve to bring forth. Owing to the frequent recurrence of the names Casey and Joyce, which are the names chiefly prevailing in the district, some confusion of persons will be inevitable to the cursory reader. Where, however, different persons possess the same Christian and surname a glance at the following list will be useful in distinguishing them : — IX. LIST OF NAMES. ARRESTED FOR THE MURDER. Patrick Joyce, Shanvallycahill, executed, guilty Patrick Casey, executed, guilty Myles Joyce, executed, innocent Michael Casey, penal servitude, guilty Martin Joyce (brother to Myles), penal servitude, innocent Patrick Joyce, Cappanacreha (another brother), penal servitude, innocent Tom Joyce (son of Patrick), penal servitude, innocent John Casey (little), Cappanacreha, penal servitude, innocent Anthony Philbin, approver Thomas Casey, approver THE ACTUAL MURDERERS (now alleged). John Casey (big), Bun-na-cnic, supposed leader, at large John Casey, Junr. (his son), Bun-na-cnic, at large Pat Joyce, Shanvallycahill executed Pat Casey, executed Pat Leyden, now in England Michael Casey, penal servitude Thomas Casey, approver INDEPENDENT WITNESSES. Anthony Joyce John Joyce, Derry (his brother) Patrick Joyce, Derry (John's son) OTHERS. John Joyce, Maamtrasna, the murdered man Michael Joyce (boy), do. (son), who died of wounds Patrick Joyce (boy), do. (son), who recovered John Joyce (young), Bun-na-cnic, the man whom the murderers called out to join them THE MA1MTRASNA MURDERS. THE APPROVER CASEY'S REVELATIONS ABOUT THE CROWN OFFICIALS. CHAPTER I. Visit to the Scene of the Murder. The revelations recently made by the informer, Thomas Casey, in connection with the horrible massacre at Maamtrasna, form but one, and by no means the strangest chapter, in the extraordinary history of this crime and its punishment. The wholesale character of the murder, the want of any sufficient motive to account for the crime, the singularly strange story of the men who alleged that they tracked the murderers for miles and witnessed the "horrible tragedy, the trials, the dying protestations, the reticence of Government with regard to some facts, and their un- wonted readiness to defend themselves by the publication of others, the plea of guilty made in the dock by men believed to be inocent, the confession of one man that though wholly ignorant of even the slightest knowledge of the murder, he swore himself guilty that he might save his own life by the sacrifice of others, and the allegation that the real murderers are at large, and known to the Crown, while men of whose innocence it is assured, lie in jail— all combine to form a story that might well challenge the pen of the most sensational novelist of our time. The duty to which I have devoted a few days among the peasantry in this wild region was not undertaken lor the purpose of catering to the taste of the curious and sensational. My pur- pose was to unravel to some extent the mystery in which this story is enveloped, and to strengthen the position of those who demand that justice shall be done. With this view I have carefully studied the history of the case, have travelled over the ground, measured certain distances, and sketched objects of importance referred to in evidence. I have also held repeated interviews with the families of the imprisoned men, with the informers and their families, and even conversed with the two men whom Thomas Casey states planned and paid for the murder. It is only by such an examina- tion as this, and with a copy of the evidence given at the trials in a man's hand, that he can properly understand the force of the statements that have been recently made by the informers Casey and Philbin. Keen as is the interest which these statements have created throughout Ireland, it yet but faintly reflects the feeling of burning anxiety aroused among the peasantry in this rugged glen. The Popular Belief not alone among the people of the locality, but everywhere I have travelled in the surrounding country, is confident and unshaken as to the complete innocence of Myles Joyce, who was executed, and his brothers, Martin and Pat, who are in penal servitude, as well as Pat's son Thomas, and John Casey, who are also in penal servi- tude. Indeed in this respect at least the confession of Thomas Casey was no revelation to the people of Maamtrasna and Cappa- nacreha. Local gossip has long ago threshed out every feature of the case which presents itself to their untutored minds, and evidence of the very strongest character has come under my notice to con- vince me that long even before the Crown had proved its case the women had got into one another's confidence during their visits to Cong and Gaiway and Dublin in connection with their husbands' defence, and no doubt remained with them, at least as to the men who were out of their beds on the fatal night, and the men who were not. Belief in the innocence of these men is by no means confined to the populace. In the course of my investigation I had many opportunities of meeting the police who are a long time resident in the locality scattered over the glen in barracks, huts, and protection posts, and wherever I had an opportunity of getting into confidential relations with a member of the force I found him to share fully the popular belief as to the guilty and the innocent. It is no exaggeration to say that there is not a peasant in the district — and scarcely a policeman — (who, by the way, are almost as numerous here as the peasantry) that attaches the slightest credence to the evidence of the three Joyces, the so-called independent witnesses. Everyone can repeat the story of the manner in which Anthony Joyce, whose brain is believed to have conceived the " independent evidence," learned with surprise of the murder of his cousin John the next day from a little girl, his daughter, who came to the bog where he was working with several more of his neighbours, and there is no man in the district more anxious to emphasise this fact than Anthony's own brother, Michael Joyce. They point, at the same time to the fact that before Anthony put his strange story into shape he first took care to go to the house of the murdered family, and by inspection assure himself that there should be no circumstance in the number of bullet wounds, or the position of affairs generally, that could give contradiction to his story ; and, having so far satisfied himself, he summoned a small family council in his brother John's house, to which only John, his son and daughter were invited, and then Anthony sought the police. Before entering into details, as I shall have to do pretty fully in the following, it may be convenient to state down here in general terms what are The Results of my Inquiry. [n the first place, I hope to be able to show that the tale which the three Joyces related as to their having tracked the murderers was not only doubtful and incredible, but impossible ; that each of their statements is contradictory ; and the whole three at variance with one another. I shall show that Philbin, the informer, so far from being, as he swore, present at the murder, did not even know the locality, and that his evidence discredits rather than corroborates the Joyces, while the original evidence of Thomas Casey differs from all in many points of striking im- portance. I hope also to satisfy my readers as to the motives which prompted the murderers as well as the motives which in- fluenced Anthony Joyce and his brother in wrongfully accusing his three cousins, Myles, Martin and Pat, and the manner in which Anthony was able to bring a grain of truth into his story, by having four guilty men among the ten whom he charged. Furthermore, I am in a position to show — and I make no light estimate of the gravity of the charge, and the difficulties which may lie in the way of its proof — that the authorities had in their possession at the time of the trial evidence which would have completely proved the story of the Joyces to be a fabrication, and that they chose to suppress this evidence rather than dis- credit the testimony of those so-called independent witnesses. And now, when the truth is forced upon them, they suffer the actual murderers to remain at large, within half a mile of the scene of the massacre, rather than discredit their former pro- ceedings by a new trial. My inquiries have also resulted in a full corroboration in every essential detail of the story unfolded by Thomas Casey in his recent revelations, and given by him to me in a manner much more minute and circumstantial than it has yet appeared. The difficulties which have to be overcome in pursuing inquiry into this extraordinary case are by no means slight. To those presented by the locality, and the almost impassible mountain track upon which the traveller has to trust himself to the instinct of his sure-footed pony, are to be added the extreme reluctance 4 of the people to give any information in view of possible and Very probable prosecutions against some of their near neighbours or relatives, and the fact that English is almost completely unknown among them, and any attempt at seeking information except through the medium of their mother tongue must end in failure. On the tirst occasion of my visit to the district, I was ac- companied by Rev. J. Corbet, P.P., Partry, and his curate, Rev. J. M'Donnell. Glensaul, where the two approvers, Thomas Casey and Anthony Philbin reside, is in the parish of Partry, or, more correctly speaking, Toomakeady ; but Maamtrasna, as well as Derry, Cappanacreha, and Shanvallycahill, are portion of the ex- tensive parish of Ross, whose P.P. is the Rev. Father IVlellet, of Clonbur. Neither of my reverend companions had ever before been in the district where the murder was committed. But I could soon see that the fame of the rev. Pastor of Partry had pre- ceded him, that they were not unacquainted with the strong bond of sympathy between him and his people, while his skill in the use of their mother tongue made them quite at ease. Even my own very imperfect knowledge of it, which enabled me with some difficulty to hold converse with them, was, next to the introduc- tion by the sogg art, the surest passport which I could possess ; and, though my sins against syntactical law must have been manifold and grievous, and occasionally excited their laughter, I yet found they had not the same dread of my open note book that tbey would have in the case of a more un-Irish " special." Protestations of Innocence. In a public letter upon this case I had occasion to refer to the dying declarations of the two men Pat Joyce and Pat Casey, who were executed with Myles Joyce. I may mention in passing, that this man Pat Joyce was not a relative of Myles. The recent official memorandum (see Appendix) of the Under-Secretary, as well as the answers of Mr. Trevelyan in Parliament, purported to draw attention to some vagueness in the declarations in which these men asserted the innocence of Myles Joyce. Facts which have since come to my knowledge show up in a very unpleasant light this trick on the part of the Castle officials. Both men were purley Irish- speaking peasants, and the attempt to discredit their dying declarations upon the ground of vagueness, is as disgraceful a sham as Castle government in Ireland ever attempted. I am furthermore assured that, so far from being vague., their declara- tions distinctly state the innocence, not alone of Myles Joyce, but of the other four men now in penal servitude, and corroborate to the full Casey's statements of the number of persons who were present at the murder. If that be so, a very ready explanation is afforded of the reluctance of Earl Spencer to produce these deposi- tions. From an official source of undoubted veracity, I learned, before I visited Maamtrasna, that four men in penal servitude, whose innocence Casey recently deposed to, have, from the very day of their reprieve, declared in the most emphatic language their entire innocence of any complicity in the murder, while the fifth man has never concealed his guilt, as I shall show later on. This fact received striking corroboration from inquiries which we made immediately on our visit to the place. We found that long before Casey made his revelations these four men, ignorant of all that was passing in the world outside, invariably referred in their letters home to their unjust incarceration. I append a few specimens of their letters. Their simple, artless style will tell more eloquently than any words of mine could with sympathetic readers. As early as June, 1883, John Casey thus wrote to his wife : — " Her Majesty's Convict Prison, " Mountjoy, Dublin, 15th June, 1883.