BY A. C. TRUE, Ph. 13., Director of the Office of Experimen t Stations. Reprint from Yearbook of Department of Agriculture for 1897. CONTENTS. Page. Introduction...... 279 Education through the publications of the Department and the experiment Siiat&tafe ! Tr < H 6 o Cl IV n f rr r dfq The f arnaers’ institute-^the adult farmers’ school i _ ; . 280 Short and special courses in agriculture-____ ____ r 281 Home reading in agriculture_________ 282 The New York plan for university extension in agriculture_ 283 Nature teaching in the rural schools___.___ 285 Nature teaching should be introduced in common schools..... 286 High-school courses in agriculture....... ...... ___ ... _ _ 287 Conclusion..._ ...... ______ 289 ILLUSTRATIONS. Plate II. Fig. 1. —Dairy building, University of Minnesota. Fig. 2. —Girls’ Home building, School of Agriculture, Minnesota. u 288 [Reprint from Yearbook of Department of Agriculture for 1897.] POPULAR EDUCATION FOR THE FARMER IN THE UNITED STATES. By A. C. True, Ph. D., Director of the Office of Experiment Stations. INTRODUCTION. § If a farmer’s boy lias obtained a good common-school education and can command the means to spend four years at school away from home, he can have a thorough course in agricultural science and prac¬ tice free of charge for tuition and at comparatively small expense for living, for agricultural colleges are now in operation in every State and Territory. A considerable number of students are now pursuing such courses, and undoubtedly many more might profitably under¬ take them. The importance of thorough technical training in the industrial arts is increasingly recognized. Agriculture is no excep¬ tion to the rule, and we may expect to see our agricultural colleges growing stronger in resources and students year by year. But it is also much clearer now than when these colleges were established that their chief functions must necessarily be to train the leaders in agri¬ cultural progress, and that they are and will be unable to meet the needs of the masses of farmers’ children. From the colleges are to come the investigators, teachers, journalists, and managers of agricul¬ tural enterprises and industries requiring a relatively high degree of scientific knowledge and expert training for their successful operation. The length and expense of a four-years’ college course will remain indefinitely as a barrier over which the average farmer’s son can not climb. The recognition of this fundamental fact, and the rapidly increasing evidence that the farmer, as well as the business man and artisan, needs special training for his occupation, have combined to create a strong demand for other agencies besides the colleges for the farmer’s education. The first responses to this demand have been attempts to meet the educational needs of adult farmers. These attempts have been largely made in connection with the agricultural colleges. EDUCATION THROUGH THE PUBLICATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT AND THE EXPERIMENT STATIONS. The most important and wide-reaching effort for the popular edu¬ cation of the masses of our farmers thus far made has been through the agricultural experiment stations and the Department of Agricul- 279 . 280 YEARBOOK OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. ture. In one sense these stations are the crowning feature of our agricultural colleges. They are departments of original research, whose primary object is to search for new truth in order that the boundaries of human knowledge regarding agricultural science and practice may be enlarged. But under the law the stations have been compelled to issue frequent bulletins for distribution among the farmers, and it was soon discovered that the only way by which the sta¬ tions could clearly set forth the results of their original in vestigations so that the masses of the farmers might understand and utilize them was to furnish a large amount of preliminary information explaining the progress made in various lines of agricultural theory and practice prior to the establishment of our stations. Hence, a great deal of the time and energy of our station workers has thus far been spent in educating the farmers through bulletins of information. Indeed, so popular has this kind of publications proved that the pressure upon station officers to prepare them has often compelled them to defer other important work, and this task is still a serious hindrance to the progress of our stations along the lines of research for which they Avere established. Some idea of the extent of this work may be obtained from the fact that during the past year the stations issued ^"'"'407 bulletins, which Avere mailed to 506,100 addresses. The total num¬ ber of pages in these publications Avas 15,785. The United States Department of Agriculture has aided in this movement through numerous publications, especially the Farmers’ Bulletins, of which over 2,000,000 copies Avere distributed last year, and the Yearbook, of which 500,000 copies are annually printed. THE FARMERS’ INSTITUTE—THE ADULT FARMERS’ SCHOOL. Meantime the farmers’ institutes have been extending their Avork. These have been an outgrowth or extension of the “open ” or “public” meetings held by State or local agricultural societies. While they haA T e not displaced such meetings, they iioav exceed them in number and popularity, and ha\ T e become important agents in the education of the farmer in a number of States. The institute is the adult farmers’ school. Here they may learn from scientists and investigators the principles Avhich underlie the art of agriculture, and from successful farmers the best methods of applying those principles. The scientist at the same time learns the needs of the farmer and finds out from the results of actual practice the truth or falsity of theories and deductions made from experi¬ ments on a limited scale. The views of both farmer and experi¬ menter are broadened, and sympathetic relations are established by the close social contact which marks the institute in its most per¬ fect form. The institutes are carried on under various auspices and are sup¬ ported in very different Avays in different sections, but the character POPULAR EDUCATION FOR THE FARMER. 281 of the meetings themselves is everywhere essentially the same. They may last for hut half a day, as in Louisiana, where the farmers assemble once a month at the experiment station, or may continue three or four days. The tendency, however, seems to be toward shortening the duration and increasing the number of the meetings, thus distributing them among a greater number of localities. They are usually held during the winter, when the stress of the farm work is somewhat lessened, but in some States very valuable meetings have been held at other seasons of the year, the character of the work being adapted to some need specially felt at the time. The programmes are planned to promote the interchange of ideas, a full and free discussion being sought upon topics introduced in an address or paper by some specialist. Speakers upon scientific sub¬ jects and successful farmers who have attained more than local reputations are usually selected as institute workers by those who have charge of the system of institutes for the State, or they may be chosen by the local authorities from lists of such workers prepared by the central bureau. The local committee invites successful farmers of the neighboring districts to explain their methods and provides music'and literary or other general exercises. All persons in attend¬ ance, the humblest as well as the most prominent, are urged to ask questions upon points suggested in the addresses and to present related facts gained from personal experience. A “question box” is frequently made use of, answers being given by the conductor of the institute or by some one specially fitted to supply the information asked. For the evening sessions the usual plan is to have a popular lecture upon some subject of general agricultural interest. This address is made somewhat more elaborate and complete than those of the day sessions, and less opportunity is given for discussion. The institutes have been so successful and so popular in States where they are carefully and systematically conducted that there is a growing demand for increase in their number and frequency in these States and for the extension of similar systems to States which now hold institutes at irregular and infrequent intervals. In nearly all the States and Territories institutes or meetings of similar character are now held with more or less frequency and regularity. SHORT AND SPECIAL COURSES IN AGRICULTURE. The agricultural colleges have further sought to meet the demand for more elementary and practical education in agriculture by estab¬ lishing short courses. These may either cover agriculture in general or be confined to some special line, as dairying. The courses offered by the University of Wisconsin may serve to illustrate this feature of the American system for agricultural education. “The short 282 YEARBOOK OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. course in agriculture,” it is stated, “is designed to meet the wants of young farmers who desire practical, helpful instruction in agricul¬ ture before taking up their chosen vocation. This course covers two terms of twelve weeks each, beginning the first of January each year.” It includes lectures on feeds and feeding, breeds of live stock, agri¬ cultural chemistry, agricultural physics and meteorology, plant life, veterinary science, dairying, farih bookkeeping, horticulture, agri¬ cultural economics, and bacteriology. Laboratory practice is given in dairying, physics, plant life, stock judging, and horticulture, and practical work in carpentry and blacksmithing. The dairy course occupies one term and includes theoretical and practical instruction in the science and practice of dairying and dairy farming. It is definitely planned to meet the needs of persons intending “to operate creameries and cheese factories,” and has been very successful in training men competent for work of this kind. The students engage in milk testing, operate separators and butter extractors, and attend to the ripening of the cream, churning and packing butter, and all the operations of a creamery and cheese factory. HOME READING IN AGRICULTURE. Various plans for extending the influence of the agricultural col¬ leges among the farmers by what is known as university extension work have been tried during the past five or six years. One of the most interesting of these movements was inaugurated by the State College of Pennsylvania. In 1892 this college offered a course desig¬ nated as “ Home reading in agriculture,” the main features of which were as follows: (1) A carefully prepared course of reading designed to cover the most important branches of agricultural science and practice. (2) A reduction of price upon the books needed, all of which were standard works. (3) Personal advice and assistance through correspondence. (4) Examinations upon subjects read, with certificates and diplomas for those attaining certain grades of excellence. This course attracted considerable attention at home and abroad and received numerous applications for admission from students, a number of whom did excellent work, completed their prescribed course, and received diplomas. During the following years the number of students was largely increased, and a demand was made by them for more extended work and more individual aid from the college. To meet this demand the list of books has been largely increased, now constituting five divi¬ sions of five books each upon the subjects of crop production, animal production, horticulture, dairying, and domestic economy. In addi¬ tion to these twenty-five books, a supplementary list of fifteen books is added, from which students may select books to form additional courses if they desire. POPULAR EDUCATION FOR THE FARMER. 283 The course consists of thorough study of ten books and a satisfac¬ tory examination upon the same. To meet the demand made by the students for greater aid from the college, lessons have been provided on various books in the course. These are sent to students free of cost. These lessons aim to give new matter, or, in other words, to bring the book up to date, to make suggestions for study, observation, and experiment, and to give page references to the book. Each lesson is accompanied by an examina¬ tion paper covering the subject of the lesson. Students are required to satisfactorily answer these examination questions or discuss the topics there mentioned before they can receive a second lesson. THE NEW YORK PLAN FOR UNIVERSITY EXTENSION IN AGRICULTURE. In 1894 the legislature of New York passed a bill out of which has grown a movement in behalf of agricultural education, which bids fair to make a deep and lasting impression, especially upon the com¬ mon schools. The Nixon bill, as it is popularly called, grew out of a desire on the part of certain persons in Chautauqua County, N. Y., to have the experiment station connected with the College of Agri¬ culture of Cornell University undertake some cooperative experiments in their vineyards. As finally passed, the act gave $8,000 to the sta¬ tion “for the purpose of horticultural experiments, investigations, instruction, and information in western New York.” The work was organized under Prof. L. H. Bailey, and consisted of investigations in horticulture, plant diseases, and entomology; teaching by means of itinerant schools and lectures, and the publication of bulletins of information. So successful was the first year’s operations that the appropriation was increased to $16,000 for the next two years. The educational features of the enterprise were extended, with the effect that the legislature of 1897 made an appropriation of $25,000 for “the promotion of agricultural knowledge in the State,” and put this in charge of the College of Agriculture instead of the experiment station. The work now in progress is much wider in scope and more thor¬ oughly organized than that hitherto attempted. It retains, however, the main features of the previous enterprise. These are— (1) The itinerant or local experiment as a means of teaching. (2) The readable expository bulletin. (3) The itinerant school. (4) Elementary nature teaching in the rural school. (5) Instruction by means of correspondence and reading courses. Several hundred simple field experiments with fertilizers, potatoes, and sugar beets have been conducted the past season in different parts of the State. Several bulletins, with numerous illustrations, have been widely circulated. Numerous itinerant schools have been held. “These are meetings which last two or more days, at which time certain instructors take up definite lines of instruction, giving 284 YEARBOOK OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. by far the greater part of tlieir attention to underlying principles and not to mere facts or methods.” The attempt to introduce nature teaching into the rural schools has aroused much popular interest. The purpose and method of this work have been fully set forth in a recent bulletin and are here summarized. It was conceived that the fundamental difficulty with our agricultural condition was that there was no attempt to instruct the children in matters which will awaken an interest in country life, and therefore that the place in which to begin to correct the agricultural status was with the children and the rural schools. For the purpose of determining what should be done many rural and village schools were visited during the past year and simple lessons were given on natural objects. The result was that all the instructors were impressed with the readiness with which the children imbibed the information, their keen desire for it and appreciation of it, and the almost universal interest which teachers took in this kind of work. It was clear that the greatest good which could be rendered to the agricultural communities was to awaken an interest in nature study on the part of teachers and children. In order to facilitate teaching in this direction, leaflets were issued to show teachers how nature study may be presented to the pupils, and these have been received with the greatest enthusiasm by educators and many others who have examined them. The outgrowth of this work with the schools is that it seems certain that the best way in which to reach the pupils and the teachers is by short and sharp observations upon plants, insects, and other natural objects, and not by means of definite lectures of stated lengths. This work has already been presented to the leachers at some of their insti¬ tutes, where ib has also met with favor, and it has received the com¬ mendation of the superintendent of public instruction and other persons in authority. So far as the present outlook is concerned, it is, perhaps, not too much to say that many believe that this move¬ ment, directed toward the young people of the rural communities, is the most important one which has developed in agriculture since the consummation of the experiment-station idea. Instruction by means of correspondence has been an outgrowth of the last year. There were about 1,600 readers upon the lists at the close of the first three months. It is the plan in this reading course to set the farmers to reading upon certain definite subjects, and then to make them think upon those subjects by periodical questioning. Some months ago the College of Agriculture had enrolled under the head of “University extension work ” 15,000 pupils and 10,000 teachers of the public schools and 1,600^young farmers. The pupils and farmers receive guidance by means of printed circulars, and the farmers report progress and difficulties upon special blanks, which are furnished. Six instructors are employed throughout the State in conducting university extension work, and special teachers are employed from POPULAR EDUCATION FOR THE FARMER. 285 time to time as occasion requires. These instructors meet the teachers of the public schools in the presence of their pupils and at teachers’ associations and institutes for the purpose of illustrating methods for teaching nature studies directly or indirectly related to agriculture. The leaflets furnished serve as texts for the subjects taught. 'The result of pushing this educational motive into the rural com¬ munities has been a most decided waking up of those communities, which, even if the work were to stop at the present time,will continue to exert an influence for a generation and more. All this work lias been experimental—an attempt to discover the best method of teaching the people in agriculture. The promoters of this movement believe that the most efficient means of elevating the ideals and practice of the rural communities are as follows, in approxi¬ mately the order of fundamental importance: (1) The establishment of nature study or object-lesson study, combined with field walks and incidental instruction in the principles of farm practice, in the rural schools; (2) the establishment of correspondence instruction in con¬ nection with reading courses, binding together the university, the rural schools, and all rural literaiy or social societies; (3) itinerant or local experiment and investigation, made chiefly as object lessons to farmers, and not for the purpose, primarily, of discovering scien¬ tific facts; (4) the publication of reading bulletins which shall inspire a quickened appreciation of rural life, and which may be used as texts in rural societies and in the reading courses, and which shall prepare the way for the reading of the more extended literature in books; (5) the sending out of special agents as lecturers or teachers or as investigators of special local difficulties or as itinerant instructors in the normal schools and before the training classes of the teachers’ institutes; (6) the itinerant agricultural school, which shall be equipped with the very best teachers, and which shall be given as rewards to the most intelligent and energetic communities. NATURE TEACHING IN THE RURAL SCHOOLS. There are many interesting points in the scheme of university extension work for agriculture thus outlined, but particular attention should be given to that part of it which relates to the introduction of nature teaching in the common schools. For more than a hundred years schemes for the teaching of agriculture in the common schools have from time to time been put forward and have attracted more or less public notice. None of them, however, has been found practi¬ cable. This is largely because they have ignored the conditions existing in our common schools, as well as the nature of the subjects with which the theory and practice of agriculture deal. The great object of teaching agriculture in school courses must ever be to acquaint students with the principles on which sound practice should YEARBOOK OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 286 be based and show the direction in which agricultural progress is going. The art of agriculture is best learned on the farm. That is the place where the boy learns how to plow, plant, and reap, and how to feed and care for stock. It is true that at an agricultural college or other school where the farmer’s boy may reside for a considerable period he may learn new and better ways of doing these things than on his father’s farm, but what chance is there that he can ever learn such things as a child in a common rural school where most of his time must necessarily be given to acquiring the rudiments of a gen¬ eral education J) If he is to be taught agriculture at all in the com¬ mon school, the course must consist very largely of the principles underlying agricultural practice, that is, he must be taught why he plants and plows and reaps in one way rather than another and what laws of nature he violates in the bad management of his crops, stock, or dairy, and the penalties which will surely result. But agri¬ cultural principles are complex affairs, having their foundation in several sciences and only imperfectly understood even by the most advanced investigators. They are matters which the mature mind may profitably consider, but which are out of place in elementary schools. For this reason most of the experiments in teaching agri¬ culture in the lower schools have proved failures. It is true that something has been done in Europe, but it is only here and there where unusually gifted teachers have been found that even a meas¬ ure of success has been attained. In our rural elementary schools there is much less prospect that any useful work of this kind can be done. NATURE TEACHING SHOULD BE INTRODUCED IN COMMON SCHOOLS. There is every reason to believe that the plan of “nature teaching,” as proposed by Cornell University, may prove a grand success and be of very great benefit to farmers’ children// The element of education which is at present most lacking in our common schools is the train¬ ing of the powers of observation. The children need above all things else to be taught to observe carefully and correctly and to state their observations in clear and terse language. The ordinary child, whether on the farm or in the town, actually sees comparatively little in the world about him. The wonders of the trees and plants in park or meadow, of birds and insects flying about the house, float like shadowy visions before his eyes. “ Seeing, he sees not.” He needs a teacher who can open his eyes and fix his mind on the realities among which his daily life is passed. This accurate observation of natural objects and facts is the only foundation on which scientific attainments can rest. The scientist is chiefly a man who sees better than his fellow men. But it is also a great help in practical life. Many farmers acquire much of this power by their own unaided efforts. And these are the very men who most regret that they did not have in early life POPULAR EDUCATION FOR THE FARMER. 287 the help of a trained teacher. The farmer’s child lives where lie has the best opportunity for such training. It would benefit him in the practice of his art, and it would add an interest to his life which would do much to wean him from a desire to leave the farm for the turmoil and uncertain struggles of the town. With proper provision for the training of teachers in normal and other schools, it would be entirely feasible to have this nature teaching in all our common schools within a few years. It is such teaching that the child mind craves. With it the school becomes a delightful place and the teacher an angel of light. The leaflets which the College of Agriculture of Cornell * University is issuing show how vitally this nature teaching may be made to affect agriculture, though it is not in itself the teaching of agriculture. In one leaflet the teacher is instructed to have the chil¬ dren plant squash seeds, dig some of them up at intervals to learn how the seeds germinate, and watch what happens to the little plants as they push their way up through the soil and unfold their stems and leaves in the air. Four apple twigs form the subject of some other lessons, and it is wonderful how much a child can learn about the way trees grow from such simple materials. At another time the children are encouraged to plant little gardens and carefully watch some of the things which grow in them. Or they study some insect which preys upon fruit or make collections of the insects about their homes, or watch them to see whether they are doing things good or bad for the farmer. Is it not likely that a child who is thus taught will soon begin to see a new value and dignity in farm life and to be less envious of the boy or girl who is shut up within the narrow confines of city streets most of the year? And if the farmer’s boy learns how to accurately observe the processes of nature with which farm practice deals and the foes with which agriculture lias to contend, are not the chances vastly increased that he will be successful in managing nature so as to get the greatest favors from this coy mistress of his life and fortune? HIGH-SCHOOL COURSES IN AGRICULTURE. With nature teaching in our common schools and training in the science of agriculture in our colleges, there would yet remain one vacant place in our scheme for a system of agricultural education suited to the varied needs of all our people. Between the college and the common school is the high school, normal school, or academy. Large numbers of farmers’ boys and girls go to these schools, com¬ monly located near their homes, who are unable to attend the longer and more expensive college courses. Surely some provision for agricultural instruction ought to be made in such schools. Thus far only a few attempts have been made in this country to provide agri¬ cultural instruction of the higli-school grade. It is true that some of the agricultural colleges receive students directly from the common 288 YEARBOOK OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. schools, hut the constant tendency is to raise the grade of instruction in these institutions to a college basis and, under any conditions, they very imperfectly perform the duties of secondary schools of agricul¬ ture. The University of Minnesota lias in recent years maintained a school of agriculture (see PI. 11) in which instruction in agricul ture of a lower grade than that given in the college of agriculture has been successfully imparted. This school has proved quite popular. Some 300 students were in attendance last year, and it lias been found desirable to offer courses for girls as well as boys. The State of Alabama lias recently provided for the maintenance of a school of agriculture of secondary grade in each of the nine Congressional districts of the State. The establishment of such special schools of agriculture of high- scliooi grade is greatly to be commended. One of the best effects of such schools at the present time is to show the people what distinc¬ tions should be drawn between colleges and high schools for agricul¬ tural education. By the separation of these grades of instruction the colleges will be enabled to do their proper work more efficiently, and better opportunities will be secured for those students whose previous training only fits them for high-school work in agriculture. But it is not believed that these special agricultural high schools will fully meet the needs of our farmers for agricultural instruction of this grade. Any school so distant from the farmer’s home as to necessi¬ tate long journeys and residence at the school for two or more years must necessarily be too expensive for most-of the farmers’ children, especially after they have reached an age when their services maybe more or less utilized on the farm. What is needed is courses in agri¬ culture in numerous schools to which farmers’ children resort, near their homes, to “finish” their education after they are through with the common schools. It is believed that some such plan as the following would be practi¬ cable and beneficial for a large number of schools and students: Many of the rural high schools, normal schools, and academies (that is, any schools of higher grade than the common or district schools) now employ at least one teacher qualified to give elementary instruction in one or more natural sciences. As compared with the more thorough courses given in the colleges the instruction in many branches, such as rhetoric, history, botany, and chemistry, which is given in the high schools, consists of an outline or skeleton course, presenting in a systematic way the main features of the science. In this way the pupil learns some of the most important principles and, what is of more consequence, gets an idea of the course and tendency of modern progress in these lines of knowledge. This may form the basis for more thorough training afterwards, but even if it goes no further than the high school, the mental horizon of the student has at least been broadened for all his life, and the chances are that he will prove a Yearbook U. S. Dept, of Agriculture, 1897. Plate II Fig. 1.—Dairy Building, University of Minnesota. Fig. 2.—Girls’ Home Building, School of Agriculture, Minnesota POPULAR EDUCATION FOR THE FARMER, 289 more progressive and successful man than if lie had confined his education to the common school. Now, what is being already done in other subjects in the high schools may easily be done in agriculture. When a teacher of natural science is being selected for such a school located in or near a rural com¬ munity, let one requisite be that he shall have had training in the science and practice of agriculture, preferably at an agricultural col¬ lege. Such a teacher will be able to offer, it may be as an optional study, an outline course in the theory and practice of agriculture. The farmer’s boy or girl may then take this course in agriculture in connection with other courses at the high school without going far or long from home. If he lias had nature teaching in the common school lie will be all the better prepared for this secondary course in agricul¬ ture, and the more practice he has had on the farm the better able he is likely to be to appreciate and profit by a systematic course in agriculture in the high school. It is of course not pretended that this outline course can take the place of the longer and more thorough courses at colleges and special schools of agriculture, but it will be far better than no course at all. It will open the mind of the pupil to the wonderful progress which is being made in agricultural science and practice. It will enable him to take more thorough advantage of the information furnished through books, bulletins of experiment stations, farmers’ institutes, home reading clubs, etc. It will come to him at a time of life when he is making choice of his life occupa¬ tion, and it is believed it wilL be a powerful incentive to keep those boys on the farm who are fitted to get the most in every way out of a farmer’s life. CONCLUSION. In 1896, out of a total population of some 70,000,000 in the United States, 16,000,000 young persons were enrolled in the schools and col¬ leges, of whom three-fourths, or 12,000,000, were in places of less than 8,000 inhabitants. In schools having secondary grades, that is, high schools, normal schools, and academies, it is estimated, from somewhat imperfect statistics, that there were 600,000 pupils in 7,000 schools. Probably 400,000 of these secondary-school students were in 5,000 schools, located in places having less than 8,000 inhabitants. If agri¬ culture could be generally taught in schools of secondary grade, it is obvious that the effect would be widespread. How much more widely such instruction might be diffused than it is at present may be inferred from the fact that in 1897 there were in all only 64 colleges having courses in agriculture, which were taken by 3,930 students. It is evident we are making much progress in devising and carrying out wise plans for the education of the farmer. With nature teach¬ ing in the common schools, high and normal school courses in agricul¬ ture, colleges of agriculture, experiment stations, farmers’ institutes, 290 YEARBOOK OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. liome reading circles, and the agricultural press, the farmer would have a quite complete system of education in his art. This would bring agriculture well into line with the great commercial and manu¬ facturing enterprises of our day, which owe so much to technical edu¬ cation, and would greatly help to take away from agriculture the reproach of being a “belated industry.” C \ 1