^:>%: wm ^^. \ J ^^^ y- ■\ /--' '^ ./ CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN SIR LOUIS MALLET, C.B AND MR. DAVID MACIVER, M.P. \_Extracted from the British Empire Newspaper, August 9, 1879.] The following correspondence has passed between Sir Louis Mallet, C.B., and Mr. David Maclver, M.P., in respect to Mr. Maclver's recent speech in the House of Commons, on Mr. Chaplin's motion for a Royal Commission, challenging the accuracy of Sir Louis Mallet's figures in his recent pamphlet on " Reciprocity." SIR LOUIS MALLET TO MR. D. MACIVER. Sir L. Mallet presents his compliments to Mr. Maclver, and with refer- ence to his reported remarks in the House of Commons, begs to enclose a note on the subject of the discrepancies between certain figures given in his letter on " Reciprocity," and those with which they are compared in the British Empire newspaper. India Office, July 15, 1879. Manufactured and Half-7nanufactui'ed Articles. Imports into the United Kingdom, 1877. Sir Louis Mallet's figures (taken from the Statistical Abstract for the United Kingdom, 25th number) give the value of the imports under the above head as ^bowt forty -?iine millions. Mr. Maclver, on the other hand, gives their value as nearly sixty-five millions. The discrepancy may be accounted for as follows ; r. Mr. Maclver includes in his list the following articles which are included by Sir Louis Mallet under the head " Articles for Consumption," viz. : Oil-seed cake ;^i,457,oo3 Sugar (refined and candied) 5>794>232 3 2: The following articles, given by Mr. Maclver as manufactures or half-manufactures, are not entered separately in the Statistical Abstract, and were, therefore, included by Sir Louis Mallet under the separate head of " Articles Unenumerated," viz. : Beads of glass ;,^66,26o Caoutchouc manufactures .... ... 86,676 China and porcelain ware ...... 279,888 Cordage and twine ........ 542,048 Cork, manufactured 491,503 Cotton yam 379>8oi Embroidery and needlework 84,609 Hats and bonnets 183,513 Jute yarn 37,959 Lace 521,384 Leather boots and shoes ....... 348,786 Leather unenumerated ....... 379,005 Linen yarn and manufactures ...... 575,401 Musical instruments . ....... 615,702 Painters' colours ........ 759, 55^ Paper 684,631 Toys 444,829 House frames, &c. ........ 120,524 Manufactured goods (unenumerated) 5,748,653 Imports from the United States. Sir Louis Mallet gives the value of our manufactured and half- manufactured imports from the United States as about two 7?iillions : the British Empire gives them as about t/iree and a half inillions. Sir Louis Mallet's figures are taken from the annual statement of the Trade of the United Kingdom with Foreign Countries and British Posses- sions for the year 1877, p. 206. The British Empire gives the following articles, which do not appear in that statement, viz. : , * Chemical manufactures . Cotton ,, Glass Linen , , ;^37,074 400,000 4,393 5,162 Leather , , Muskets . Painters' colours ■ 30,499 6,199 15,081 Toys House frames, &c. . 13,813 37,493 Also the British Empire includes in its list of American manufac- tures or half-manufactures imported the two following articles, which have throughout been treated by Sir Louis Mallet as " Articles for Consump- tion," viz. : Oil-seed cake Sugar (refined) ;^i,o5i,843 425,150 MR. DAVID MACIVER TO SIR LOUIS MALLET. Mr. Maclver begs to thank Sir Louis Mallet for explaining the discre- pancy between the figures given in his letter on " Reciprocity " and those quoted by Mr. Maclver in the House of Commons. Sir Louis Mallet's note, however, does not indicate that the '* Cobden Club " is taking any steps to correct the mistake which Mr. Maclver pointed out. The " Cobden Club " has printed, and is circulating, Sir Louis Mallet^s letter on " Reciprocity " in a form which conveys the impression that when Sir Louis Mallet gave the value of our "imports of manufactured and half-manufactured goods," he intended to include the whole of such imports. Mr. Maclver readily admits that Sir Louis Mallet treated part of these imports as " articles of consumption," and another part as "articles unenu- merated " ; but, most unfortunately. Sir Louis Mallet omitted to mention that the articles so treated were in reality manufactures. Mr. Maclver, therefore, having waited, as he thinks, a sufficient length of time without hearing from the " Cobden Club," and believing that Sir Louis Mallet's letter on "Reciprocity" is still being circulated unaccom- panied by the explanation which he is now good enough to furnish, considers himself entirely justified in sending this correspondence to the press. House of Commons: August 6, 1879. ^mmf' (^