HISTORY OF THE ARCHDIOCESE of ST. LOUIS REV. JOHN ROTHENSTEINER SUa i *$c . 2 8r<2- 'L I B RA HY OF THE UN IVER.SITY Of ILLI NOI5 282 R?4h v.l cop. 3 llliwiis \mmm flipvnr HISTORY OK THE ARCHDIOCESE OK ST. LOUIS Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/historyofarchdio01roth Lls^^nU^* 1 ^ Archbi&hop ol .nt Louis. HISTORY OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. LOUIS In its Various Stages of Development from 4. D. 1673 to A. D. 1928 by REV. JOHN ROTHENSTEINER Archivist of the Catholic Historical Society of St. Louis VOLUME I Containing Parts One and Two ST. LOUIS, MO. 1928 NIHIL OBSTAT H. HUSSMANN Censor librorum. Deputatus Sti. Ludovici, die 23. Novembris 1928. IMPRIMATUR ►J- JOANNES J. GLENNON Archiepiscopus Sti. Ludovici, die 24. Novembris 1928. Copyright 192H Rev. John Rothensteiner Phess of BLACKWELL WIELANDY CO. St. Louis, Mo., U. S. A. To His Grace THE MOST REVEREND JOHN JOSEPH GLENNON, D. D. Archbishop of St. Louis In Memory of the TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY OF HIS SUCCESSION to the ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. LOUIS OCTORER 13, 1903 The Author Mr. Edward Brown Rev. Gilbert J.Garrcfdhan S.J. COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATIONS PREFACE Lovers and students of the past have frequently remarked with feelings of profound surprise and regret, that the great Archdiocese of St. Louis has no written history worthy of the name. The nearest approach to such a desideratum is found in the various chapters on Xew Orleans and St. Louis in John Gilmary Shea's History of the Catholic Church in the United States. But these chapters, being part of an extensive whole, and consequently restricted in scope, cannot fill the demand for a detailed history of the diocese. It was long known that the Church in these parts has a history and a most interesting one, a history of heroic endeavor and sacrifice, of beautiful and saintly lives, a history of failures mingled with the successes, of temporary reverses and final -triumph. For so glorious a present, as the Archdiocese offers today, with its noble Cathedral, its Seminary, its hundreds of Churches and Schools, its great University, its Colleges and Academies, its Hospitals, Orphanages, and other In- stitutions of Religion and Charity, and lastly its devoted army of priests and religious, presupposes a great and ever memorable past. For if the Catholic Church today lives and labors among us with all the youthful courage and hope, and with all the superior wisdom of age, she most assuredly owes it largely, under God, to her humble, loving and heroic founders, the bishops and priests of her early dawn. To recall to the memory of the present generation, and to transmit to future ages the record of the deeds and sufferings and sacrifices of these pioneers of the Church in the heart of the Mississippi Valley, is the purpose of these volumes. The main credit for this undertaking belongs to His Grace, the present Archbishop of St. Louis, the Founder and chief Patron of the Catholic Historical Society of St. Louis. This Society was organized in 1917, for the purpose of collecting and preserving materials of all kind, "relating to the Catholic history of the Diocese of St. Louis and of whatever territories and places that were, at any time, associ- ated with St. Louis in the same Ecclesiastical division, and of institu- ting, carrying on and fostering historical research on subjects per- taining to the field of inquiry above described, and disseminate such information." In December, 1918, the first number of a quarterly publication was issued by the Society under the editorship the Rev. Dr. Charles L. Souvay, CM. D.D. Dr. Souvay's associates in the so-called Committee (v) vi Preface on Publication were the Rev. Fathers: F. G. Holweck, Gilbert J. Gar- raghan, S.J., John Rothensteiner, and .Mi'. Edward Brown. The five members of this Committee worked together in perfect harmony and mutual helpfulness. A number of informal meetings were held in which cadi < 's newly-gained information was communicated to all. At stated times historical papers were read and discussed, rousing fresh interest in other members of the Society and even beyond. Much useful and interesting - material was found hidden away, like the golden nuggets in the quartz, in a mass of histories, biographies, books of travel, historical articles and occasional notes in Reviews and Magazines. Sometimes very pleasant surprises were met with in most unpromising places. The richest source, however, of our diocesan history Avas found in the Archives of the Diocese of St. Louis and of the St. Louis University, and the Archives of Notre Dame. These manuscript sources super- seded, to a great extent, the printed materials, offering an unprecedented mass of new facts and interpretations of old ones, vouched for by the very actors and eyewitnesses of what transpired. For the earlier part of our history we found great help in the various volumes of the so-called Jesuit Relations, and of the Virginia and British Series of the Illinois Historical Collections. The annual publications of the Leopoldine Association of the Austrian Empire, and the A u miles ill lii propagation Galilean!" The restless greed for gold and peltry opened the roads for the missionaries in their unselfish quest of souls. The horrors of the (xi) xii Introduction French revolution drew multitudes of cultured and deeply religious men into the wilderness of Louisiana to become the founders, not only of eilies, but of dioceses and religious institutions, in fact of a mighty province of God's Kingdom. The terrible famine in Ireland, and the religious, and political disturbances in Europe broughl millions of intelligenl and able bodied men and women to the prairies and fruit- ful valleys of Illinois, Missouri, Iowa and Arkansas, as the lirst claim- ants of the virgin soil; and the over-weening pride of the instigators of the socalled Kultur-Kampf in the newly founded Empire of Germany compelled thousands of noble priests and religious to seek a new field of labor in a foreign land, which was to become dearer to them than the land of their birth. Misguided men in their pride of heart, and the destroying elements in league with them, rose in anger against God's mysterious purposes: but one by one they Tailed, and left us but another proof of God's interposition in the affairs of men, "reaching from v\u\ to end mightily and disposing all things sweetly."' Whilst then we endeavor to recognize the guiding hand of Divine Providence in all the changes of history, we are not disconcerted by the discovery of evil within tlie pale, nay in the very sanctuary of Cod's Church. A history must above all things be true; and as a non-Catholic historian justly says, "glozing of faults and apologizing for wrong deeds is not the part of an honest friend or of an honest man. The Church can afford to have the truth told even about herself." The sanctity of the Church remains untouched even by the failings and misdeeds of her children. Yet the Savior tells us: "By their fruits you shall know them." The Church has produced wonderful fruits in the wide fields of the diocese of St. Louis. Not only fruits of everlasting life in the inward beauty and holiness of countless souls, but also in the outward works, the cultural values of education, civic virtue and the arts, especially of architecture, scultpure and painting. It will be the historian's most pleasant task to trace the influences of the Church upon the Communities in which she has lived and labored for up wards of 250 years. I say 250 years, although it is Avell known that the Diocese of St. Louis bears only one hundred years in its crown of glory. Yet the period of one and one-half century intervening between the foundation of the Mission of the Immaculate Conception of Kaskaskia and the erection of the diocese of St. Louis, -with Joseph Rosati as ,ts first bishop, was but a time of preparation for the coming greatness and power of St. Louis; and Kaskaslria itself, with its idyllic days and ways, appears as the Alba Longa of the future Rome of the West. In the first chapter of his History of Rome, Livy speaks of things that have happened "before the building of the City, or be- fore its building was contemplated," of the foundation of Lavmium Introduction xiii by Aeueas, and of the foundation of the town of Alba Longa by his son Ascanius. Then he shows how the overflow population of these two places was diverted to the new city on the Tiber, compared with which both Alba Longa and Lavinium should appear insignificant. ' ' Supererat multitudo Albanorum Latinorumque ; qui omnes facile spem facerent parvam Albani, parvum Lavinium prae ea urbe, quae conderetur, fore." Whilst then, in point of time, our narrative will have to concern itself with the missionary efforts of the Jesuits, the Priests of the Foreign Missions, and the early Kecollets, as a distinct part of the history of the Diocese of St. Louis, it will, in point of territorial extension, find itself taking in its purvue certain places and churches no longer associated with the present Archdiocese. When the almost boundless Diocese of Louisiana, as it existed under Bishops Peiialver and Du Bourg was divided in 1826, and the city of St. Louis became an episcopal see under Bishop Joseph Rosati, the dividing line as against New Orleans was the southern border of Arkansas. The Diocese of St. Louis comprised all of Arkansas, Missouri and Iowa and the Indian Territory as far as the Rocky Mountains and even beyond. The western half of Illinois also came under the jurisdiction of the bishop of St. Louis, at first by delegation from the Bishop of Bardstown, Flaget, and eventually, by a Papal Decree. Even Chicago was for a time under the episcopal care of Bishop Rosati who, at the request of Bishop Brute of Vincennes, sent Father Irenaeus Saint Cyr, across the prairies of Illinois to build and administer the first church in the future Great City of the Northwest. In tracing the development of religious life in the Diocese of St. Louis it will, therefore, be necessary to take regard to the widely scattered missions of Bishop Rosati 's Diocese, that have now become the twenty or more Archdioceses and dioceses of the States of Illinois. Wisconsin, Missouri. Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota and beyond. New Orleans, however, must be left out of the count, because its territory was never under the rule of St. Louis. Bishop Du Bourg, whilst residing in St. Louis for a time, and occasionally signing himself "Bishop of St. Louis," really held the title of "Bishop of Louisiana and the Floridas," with New Orleans as his appointed seat. The scope and subject matter of the History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis, therefore, divides itself into three distinct, yet disproportionate parts : PART 1. THE ERA OF PREPARATION. Which embraces the events from Father Marquette's voyage to the erection of the Diocese of St. Louis under Bishop Joseph Rosati, 1673 to 1827, a little more than one hundred and fifty years. This Part I. is subdivided into three books : XIV Introduction Book 1. Tin; E.un.v Missions on tue Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. Book 2. Tin: Church ok St. Louis in the Transition Period Book 3. Tin. Church op St. Loris Under Bishop Du Bourq op Louisian \. PART II. THE DIOCESE OF ST. LOUIS. Tli is embraces the events From the division of the diocese of Louisiana into the dioceses of St. Louis, and New Orleans, until the erection of St. Louis into an Arch- diocese under Peter Richard Kenrick, 1827 to 1847, a period of only twenty years. It is subdivided into three rather unequal books : Book 1. Bishop Joseph Rosati of St. Louis. Book 2. Bishop Peter Richard Kenrick, Coadjutor to Bishop Rosati. Book 3. Peter Richard Kenrick. Bishop of St. Louis. PART III. THE ARCH-DIOCESE OF ST. LOUIS. This final part of the History, extending; from 1847 to 1927, is likewise divided into three books: Book 1. Archbishop Peter Richard Kenrick. Book 2. Archbishop John Joseph Kain. Book 3. Archbishop John Joseph Glennon. The splendid administration of Archbishop Glennon is, as yet, too fresh in the memory of men and too sparsely documented to allow the proper perspective, required in scientific history. It will, no doubt, in some future work, form the crowning glory of a long series of beautiful developments of the Church in the Miss- issippi Valley. But for the present, a rapid description of what was accomplished, must suffice. In this regard we may say: Si historiam requiris, circumspice. TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I THE ERA OF PREPARATION Book I The Early Missions PAGE Chapter 1. The Cross Triumphant and the Blood of Martyrs 1 2. Father James Marquette and M. Joliet 7 3. La Salle, De Tonti and the Recollets 19 4. On the Illinois River 27 5. The Gentlemen op the Seminary of Quebec 34 6. The Kaskaskias on the RrvER Des Peres 42 7. Cahokia and the Seminary Priests 51 8. Last Days of Gravier and Marest 60 9. Kaskaskia and its Dependencies — 1 65 10. Kaskaskia and its Dependencies — II 73 11. Ste. Genevieve and its Dependencies 80 12. Banishment of the Jesuits 86 Book II The Church in the Valley during the Transition Period Chapter 1. The Founding of St. Louis 99 2. Civil Allegiance and Ecclesiastical Authority. . 109 3. Return of Father Sebastian Meurin 115 4. Meurin and Gibault 124 5. Father Gibault, the Patriot Priest 132 6. St. Louis as a Canonical Parish 140 7. Father Bernard's Congregation 149 8. Discord in Church and State 156 (xv) xvi Tub! < of Conti nts PAGE Chapter 9. Results op the Discord 168 10. The Sulpicians ix the [llinois Cottntry 184 11. Vicar-General James Maxweli 198 12. Wandering Westward 210 13. Father Dunand and His Trappist Brethren 218 14. Father Dunand the Lone Missionary 228 Book III The Church of St. Louis under Bishop Du Bourg of Louisiana Chapter 1. Bishop Louis William Valentin Du Bourg 'I'M 2. Church Government by Marguilliers 247 3. Bishop Flaget's Interest in St. Louis 251 4. Bishop Du Bourg's < Ioming to St. Louis 261 5. Bishop Du Bourg's Difficulties 268 6. Father Xiel and the Church-Wardens 278 7. Father Felix De Andreis 285 8. St. Mary's of the Barrens under Father Rosati. . 292 9. The Ladies of the Sacred Heart 300 10. Father Charles Nerinckx and His Relations with St. Louis 308 11. The Indian Missions and the Jesuits — 1 318 12. The Indian Missions and the Jesuits— II 327 13. Tin: Jesuit Beginnings at St. Ferdinand 335 14. The First Indian School in Missouri 340 15. The First Indian Missionary Efforts of the Jesuits :547 16. The St. Louis University 354 17. Ste. Genevieve I'xder Fathers Pratte and Dahhen 361 18. Catholic New Madrid 371 19. St. Mary's of the Barrens Under Father Torna- tore 379 20. Bishop Du Bourg and the Coadjutorship 386 21. Rosati 's Election as Coadjutor-Bishop 399 'I'l. Linking Old and New 408 Table of Contents xvii Part II THE DIOCESE OF ST. LOUIS Book I Bishop Joseph Bosati of St. Louis PAGE Chapter 1. The Diocese op St. Louis 419 2. Rosati's Visitation in the Diocese of New Orleans 431 3. Progress op a Decade 438 4. The Sisters of Charity 447 5. Father Joseph Anthony Lutz, Indian Missionary. 452 6. Father Edmund Saulnier and the Church of Arkansas 469 7. Post of Arkansas, New Gascony and Little Rock. 479 8. The Church in Cape Girardeau 490 9. The Dawn of a New Era 499 10. Bishop Rosati's Cathedral 508 11. The Missouri River Parishes 515 12. The Good Shepherd in the Wilderness 523 13. Three Crowded Years of Bishop Rosati's Life. . . . 528 14. Galena, Dubuque and Prairie Du Chien — 1 537 15. Galena, Dubuque and Prairie Du Chien — II 543 16. Father Saint Cyr and the Church in Chicago. . . 552 17. Peter Paul Lefevere of Salt River 565 18. Father Lefevere's Far-flung Missions 579 19. Father Samuel Mazzuchelli, 0. P 590 20. Father Mazzuchelli and the Church of Galena: . 599 21. Catholic Beginnings of Kansas City 608 22. Father Brickwedde of Quincy 614 23. The Visitandines of Kaskaskia 626 24. The Sisters of St. Joseph 634 25. Tin; Ivickapoo Mission 640 26. The Potawatomi Mission op Council Buffs 653 27. The Beginnings op the Oregon Missions 664 28. The Potawatomi Mission op Sugar Creek 677 29. Early Church Foundations in Central Missouri. 689 30. Father John Timon, Visitor op the Lazarists. . . . 701 xviii Table of Contents PAGE Chapter 31. The La Salle Mission 707 32. St. Michael's of Predeeicktown and Father Cellini 721 33. The First Synod op St. Louis 730 :!4. Along Sangamon River and Crooked Creek 7-tl 35. Father Hilary Tucker in Quincy 753 36. The Early German Parishes op Southwestern Illinois 76.") 37. The Early English Speaking Parishes op South- western Illinois 774 38. Bishop Rosati 's Last Year in His Diocese 77!) Book II Bishop Peter Richard Kcuricl:, Coadjutor to Bishop Rosati Chapter 1. Bishop Rosati and His Coadjutor 787 2. Bishop Peter Richard Kenrick of St. Louis 795 3. The Cathedral Parish of St. Louis 802 4. The St. Louis University and the College Church 809 Book III Peter Richard Kenrick Bishop of St. Louis Chapter 1. Bishop Kenrick and the Leopoldine Society 817 2. The First Fruits of Bishop Kenrick 's Solicitude. 825 3. The Diocesan Seminary 836 4. Northeast Missouri 845 5. Loss of Territory but Gain of Souls 854 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Archbishop John J. Glennon frontispiece page The Committee on Publication v Father James Marquette, S. J 1 Kaskaskia College 10 Old Bell op Kaskaskia 65 Map of Earliest St. Louis 99 Signatures of Priests and Prelates 108 Father P. Gibault 124 The Old Spanish Church 140 Signatures of Ste. Genevieve Priests 198 Signatures of Early Catholic Laymen 247 Bishop William L. V. Du Bourg 261 Bishop Du Bourg 's Cathedral 268 Father Felix De Andreis, CM 285 Jesuit Novitate at Florissant 335 The Old St. Louis University 354 Father Dahmen's Church at Ste. Genevieve 361 St. Mary's of the Barrens 379 Outline Map of St. Louis Diocese. 417 Bishop Joseph Rosati of St. Louis 439 Post of Arkansas . . .- 479 Father John Timon, CM 490 Bishop Rosati 's Cathedral 508 Bishop Brute's Map of "Wisconsin 537 Map of the Missionary Country 640 Bishop Peter Richard Kenrick, Coadjutor 795 PART ONE THE ERA OF PREPARATION BOOK I The Early Missions On the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers Rev. James Makquette, S. J. First White Resident of Chicago. BOOK I THE EARLY MISSIONS Chapter 1 THE CROSS TRIUMPHANT AND THE BLOOD OF MARTYRS It is an incontestable fact that the beautiful forest-clad embankment of the river whereon the great spiritual as well as civic Metropolis of the Mississippi Valley was to arise in splendor and wealth and power, had been beheld by no white man's eye before that memorable day at the end of June 1673, when Joliet and Marquette, and their five com- panions swept by in two fragile barks on the united but not commingled current of the Missouri and Mississippi, on their voyage of exploration to the unknown lands of the South. The central region of the future diocese and archdiocese of St. Louis, though bright and beautiful by nature, still lay in the darkness of ancient night, illumined only by a few faint stars of natural religion. The Indian tribes that regarded it as their ancestral home, the Osage, Missouri and Illinois, like all the other nations of North America, were individually a strange combina- tion of noble, and often heroic, qualities with the most abject super- stition and moral turpitude. The Indian was by nature generous and hospitable, and yet he could become guilty of the most savage cruelty Loving his native valleys and hills he was a wanderer without a fixed abode. His faith in the great Spirit was deep and sincere and } 7 et he had no outward sacrifice, no outward form of worship. A certain glamour of mystery encompassed him when viewed from a distance, but quickly vanished on nearer approach. To Avin such tantalizing creatures for the Kingdom of God ; to bring them the light of Faith, to raise the Cross triumphant among them was the desire of countless souls since the days of the earliest explorers and conquerors of the New World. At the beginning of the great age of European discovery and con- quest two of its leading maritime nations, Spain and France, still ad- hered with heart and soul and mind to the Catholic Faith as a living reality. Accordingly the cross accompanied the national banner; the priest and monk walked side by side with the commander; the con- ' (1) Vol. 1-1 - History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis version of the natives to the true religion was one of the main objects of every expedition. Sn it was in Spanish America, so it was in the French possessions in Canada, the region of the Great Lakes, iii the Illinois Country and Louisiana. But whilst the French were the first to arrive in the heart of the continent, the Spaniards preceded them by ~\'V2 years, on the outskirts of the future Arch-diocese of St. Louis, in Arkansas its southern limit, and in Kansas or Nebraska to the West. 1 The first efforts to carry the lighl of the gospel into the heart of this vast and sparsely populated region date hack to the year 1541, 132 years before the voyage of Lather Marquette. It was in 1 r>41 that the Spaniard Fernando De Soto crossed the Mississippi River at a point a few miles below the present city of Memphis, and marched northward along the western border of the "Great River", through the country now called Arkansas, and arrived at a place near New Madrid, in South- Last Missouri. And it was in the same year that Don Francise i Vasquez de Coronado reached the goal of his journey in the country of Quivira, somewhere "in northeastern Kansas perhaps not far from the boundary of Nebraska." Both expeditions were accompanied by priests: Coronado by the Franciscan Friar Juan de Padilla, De Soto "by twelve priests, eight brothers and four monks." De Soto ami his little army arrived on the coast of Florida on Whitsunday, 1539 and after many days of toil and strife reached the town on the Mississippi River over which the Cazique Casqui pre- sided. 2 "The greater part of the way," says one of the companions of De Soto, "lay through fields thickly set with great towns, two or three of them to be seen from one. De Soto sent word by an Indian to the cacique, that he was coming to obtain his friendship; to which he received for answer, that he would be welcomed, and all that his Lordship required from him should be done. And the cacique or chief, sent him on the road a present of skins, shawls and fish." 3 i The limits of the diocese of St. Louis at the tune of its largest extent under Bishop Rosati were the southern bounds of Arkansas, to a line drawn northward from Fort Massac, near Cairo, through Illinois to the southern bounds of Canada, thence westward to the Rocky Mountains and following them to the latitude of the southern boundary of Arkansas back to the start. 2 There are three accounts of De Soto's Expedition by e.ye witnesses: The Narrative of the Gentleman of Elvas; The Relation of Biedma and The Narrative of Ranjel. Then there is the "La Florida del Inr-a" of Garcilasso de la Vega, who states that in Peru he had met many of De Soto's gentlemen and soldiers. It is Garcilasso that mentions the names of the priests and monks with the expedition. The Narrative of the Gentleman of Elvas may be found in a good translation in Spanish Explorers in the Southern United States, pp. 129-272. 3 Lewis, Theodor H., in Spanish Explorers, p. 206. The Cross Triumphant and the Blood of Martyrs 3 Accompanied by many of his people, the cacique came half a league on the road from the town to receive the Governor, and greeting him very humbly he invited him to take lodging in his houses. The cacique went home for the night, but "returned with many Indians singing, who, when they had come to where the Governor was, all prostrated themselves. Among them were two blind men." The cacique made an address of which the writer gives but the substance: "The cacique said, that inasmuch as the Governor was the son of the Sun, he begged him to restore sight to those Indians. Whereupon the blind men arose and very earnestly entreated him to do so. De Soto answered them that in the heavens above there was One who had the power, to make them whole and do whatever they could ask of Him, whose servant he was ; that this great Lord made the heavens and the earth, and man after His image, that He had suffered on the cross to save the human race, and risen from the tomb on the third day in what of man there was of him dying, what of divinity being immortal ; and that, having ascended into heaven, He was there with open arms to receive all that would be converted to Him." The Governor then directed a lofty cross of wood to be made and set up on the highest part of the town, declaring to the cacique, that the Christian worshipped that cross in the form and memory of the true one on which Christ suffered. He placed himself with his people before it, on their knees, which the Indians did likewise; and he told them that from that time on they should thus worship the Lord, of whom he had spoken to them, that was in the Heavens, and should ask Him for whatsoever they stood in need of." 4 After this they chanted the Te Deum Laudamus, that canticle which the custom of the Catholic Church has consecrated to be at once a testimonial of public joy, and thanksgiving for favors received from Heaven, and a prayer for a continuance of its mercies. The Indians broke forth in demonstrations of joy and gratitude. The Governor marched away to other scenes, in his weary quest after gold and adventure, to find his last resting place in the waters of the Great River he had discovered. But far away to the Northwest, yet within the one-time limits of St. Louis Diocese, a similar scene was enacted. 3 It was in the year 1530 that Francisco Vasquez Coronado, having reached Cibola, asked the people of the province "to tell their friends and neighbors that Christians had come into the country, Avhose only desire it was to be their friends, and to find out about good lands to live in." 6 4 Ibidem, pp. 207-208. s Narrative of the Expedition of Coronado, by Pedro de Castaiieda, edited by F. W. Hodge, in Spanish Explorers, pp. 275-387. fi Ibidem, p. 306. I History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis Coronado had in his company four friars, three of wh m were priests, and the fourth a Lay-brother. Pray Marcos de Nizza, the Pro- vincial of the Order in Mexico, returned home after the army reached Lune-Cibola, in 1540. Fray Juan de la Cruz, already of advanced age, and Brother Louis remained with the Indians in New Mexico. The fourth Pray Juan de Padilla, comparatively a young and vigorous man. accompanied Coronado to Quivira, thai is, the region of northeastern Kansas, probably near the Nebraska border. 7 "The Quiviras were Indians of the plains Living chiefly from the buffalo, and from very limited agriculture, changing the sites of their hamlets as the bison moved to and fro." Some say they were of the tribe of the Wichitas: Father Shine places their habitat considerably farther north in the interior of the state of Nebraska. 8 Bui as both Locations are within the ancient limits of the diocese of St. Louis, we need not here decide the question, although the opinion of Bandelier seems to have greater weight. Certain it is thai the Quivira Indians were glad to have Pray Juan de Padilla with them. When Coronado and his Little army started on the homeward journey from New Mexico, in April 1542, Fray Juan de Padilla asked and received permission to return to the Quivira Indians, because his teaching seemed to bear fruit among them. lie took along the most necessary equipments for saying .Mass, seme pro visions, and al least one horse. His Journey fell in the Late summer or early fall of 1542. Tie had with him Fray Juan de la Cruz, one Portuguese soldier, two servants and some Mexican Indians. On their way they passed through Pecos, where Brother Louis was already estab- lished. They reached Quivira and were well received. 9 Coronado had caused a large cross to be erected in or near one ,,!' the villages. This cross was a starting point for the missionary. All went well for a lime; but I he zeal of I he missionary inspired him with the desire of preaching the gospel to the neighboring nations also. This was interpreted by the Quiviras as the act of a traitor, and by the other tribes as that of a spy. The outcome of this missionary rney is related by Mota-Padilla in his History of New Galicia: "The Friar nil Quivira with a small escort, againsl the will of the Indians of that village, who loved him as their father. Hut al one day's journey lie was met by Indians on the war-path, and knowing their evil intentions, he requested the Portuguese to flee, since the Latter horseback, and to take with him the Donados and the boys, t Bandeliei \. I'. Pray Juan de Padilla in American Catholic Quarterly, vol. X \ , i>. 51 - Shine, Rev. Michael A., "The Lost Province of Quivira" in The Catholic Historical Review, vol. II, April 191C, p. 3-18. o Spanish Explorers, pp. 372 :S7:'>. The Cross Triumphant and the Blood of Martyrs 5 who. being young, were able to run and save themselves. Being de- fenceless, they all fled as he desired, and the blessed Father, kneeling down, oft'ei-ed up his life, which he sacrificed for the good of the souls of others. He thus realized his most ardent desire — the felicity of martyrdom by the arrows of these barbarians, who afterwards threw his body into a pit and covered it with innumerable rocks. The Portu- guese and the Indians, returning to Quivira, gave notice there of what happened, and the natives felt it deeply on account of the love- which they had for their Father. They would have regretted it still more had they been able to appreciate the extent of their loss. The day of his death is not kown, although it is regarded as certain that it occurred in the year 1542. Don Pedro de Tobar, in some papers which he wrote and left at the town of Culiacan, stales that the Indians had gone out to kill this blessed Father in order to obtain his ornaments, and that there was a tradition of miraculous signs connected with his death, such as inundations, comets, balls of fire and the sun becom- ing darkened. " 10 How the two companions of Fray Juan de Padilla died, we have no direct testimony. Yet, it seems very probable that they also gained the crown of Martyrdom. As Bandelier so touchingly says: "Such is the funeral oration — simple, bul pathetic from its very simplicity. Of these, the two old monks. Fray Juan de la Cruz and Fray Luis, remain- ing alone in the newly-discovered land, happy to conclude their days there in whichever way it might be, provided it was in the service of their Lord and Master and for the honor and glory of his name. "The end of fray Juan de Padilla was different. As his life had been of a more vigorous cast, so his martyrdom sounded high through the land. His Sepulchre in Kansas has never been found, but it is noteworthy that from Mexico, as well as in later years from New Mexico, all attempts on the part of the Spaniards to penetrate beyond the region where his death occurred have signally failed. That region is the same where the hardiest pioneers of Catholic civilization coming from the south met, figuratively speaking, the pioneers of Catholic civilization from Canada. The tomb of Fray Juan de Padilla. there- fore, marks not a ne plus ultra, but the point where the two standard- bearers of Catholicism came together to join both ends of the advance of Catholic faith across the North American Continent." 11 It is a reflection replete with interest, that nearly four centuries ago, the Cross, the type of our beautiful religion, was planted on the banks of the Mississippi and of the Missouri, and the silent forests of 10 Mota-Padilla, Historia de Nuova Galicia, p. 167, quoted by Bandelier, 1. c, pp. 5C3-564. 11 Bandelier, 1. c, p. 565. (> History of lh< Archdiocese of St. Louis the South were awakened by the Christian's hymn of gratitude and praise, and the broad plains of the West were bedewed by the blood of martyrdom. The effect of both journeys was vivid, but transitory, "a voice crying in the wilderness,'' and was not to be heard again in those savage regions for many generations to come. It was as if a lightning gleam had broken for a moment upon a benighted world, startling it with sudden effulgence, only to leave it in tenfold gloom. The real dawning was yet afar off from the hills and prairies of this far western land. It came, at last, with Joliet and Marquette's discovery of the .Mississippi River, two hundred and fifty-five years ago. Chapter 2 FATHER JAMES MARQUETTE AND M. JOLIET In recounting the labors and vicissitudes of the early explorers of the Mississippi River and its tributaries we must invert the usual order of appreciation. To the Church-historian the lives and deeds of Marquette, Hennepin, Saint Cosme, of Joliet, La Salle and Tonti, and the magnificent band of their companions and successors, are important, first of all, in .as far as they served the cause of religion, and only in a secondary way, as serving the cause of geographic knowledge and the spread of commerce and civilization. It is therefore of little con- sequence here whether Father Marquette or Louis Joliet was the official leader of the first voyage of exploration. 1 What interests us most is that Father Marquette was the first Catholic priest that traversed the full length of the territory which was to become the Arch- diocese of St. Louis, from Prairie du Chien to the mouth of the Arkansas river, whilst the priestly companions of De Soto and Coronado only touched its southern and western fringes. It is the glorious name of Father Marquette, Jesuit priest and missionary, that stands at the head and front of Christianity in the Mississippi Valley. For the establish- ment of the Christian religion in the heart of the continent began with the conversion of the Kaskaskia and Peoria Indians on the Illinois river, a work which Father Marquette inaugurated by his perilous voyage. Yet, even in this regard Joliet deserves warm recognition, as he was beyond doubt the official commander of the expedition and, as such, greatly advanced the spiritual interests for which Father Marquette had been sent along with him by his superiors. But if Joliet was the commander of the expedition, as he certainly was, Father Marquette was just as certainly no mere chaplain. Indeed the expedition was sent out by the government for the purpose of discovery and the formation of friendly relations with the natives : yet the spread of religion among the tribes was never absent from the intentions of the government of Catholic France. As Bancroft tells us, "It was neither commercial enterprise, nor royal ambition which carried the power of France into the heart of our continent: the motive was religion." 2 Hence the representative of the civil power i On this question and on the entire matter the learned work of the Franciscan Father Francis Borgia Steck, Ph. D., "The Joliet-Marquette Expedition 1673" gives the most exhaustive and reliable information, although not all the conclusions seem convincing. 2 History of the United States, 1844, Vol. Ill, p. 121. (7) 8 History of the Archdiocese of St. Loins cooperated with the representative of the Church: and each had an equal interest in the project, and deserves an equal share in the honor. That the person of Juliet became obscured by the more illustrious personality of Father Marquette is owing to several unfortunate circum- stances, chief among them the loss of his papers just before his arrival at Quebec, thus leaving Father Marquette as the main witness in regard to the momentous events of their common voyage. Neither Joliel nor Marquette was the first to divine the secret of the mighty river of the West. Others had blazed the way to the post of vantage, Machillimackinac, at the juncture of Lake Superior and Michigan, and had gathered information from the Indians thai proved very useful to the explorers. They were for the most pari children of Catholic France, the France of Louis XIII and his splendid son, brave, joyous, cultured, and above all, animated by the spirit of religion ; men to whom the task was assigned by Providence to open the interior of the North- American continent to the Church and civilization. Following in the wake of ('artier, the intrepid Champlain founded the city of Quebec at the junction of the St. Charles River with the St. Lawrence — 1608, and proceeding up the mighty river, planted the Lilies of France on the banks of Lake Huron long before the landing of the May-Flower on the rugged coast of New England — 1620. The first part of the Seventeenth century was devoted to the exploration of the Great Lakes. In 1634 Jean Nicollet, 3 one of Champlain 's companions, passed through the Straits of .Mackinac and reached the country around the Fox and Wisconsin rivers. Mean- while the Jesuit Fathers had begun a flourishing mission among the Huron Indians at the foot of Lake George. From this as a base, in 1643, a missionary exploring party wenl to the strait where the waters leap down from Lake Superior. This they christened the Sault de Ste. Marie. 4 It was here that St. Isaac Jogues prayed and preached to the tribesmen of the upper lakes. In 1669 Father Claude Allouez, who had traced the entire coast-line of Lake Michigan before 1670 opened a number of missions in the Indian Villages (in the eastward (lowing streams, and incidentally gathered all information about the Far western countries and the mysterious river flowing either to the west or south. It was a younger companion of Allouez, Father .lames Marquette, that was to plow the waves of the great river and to carry the first tidings of the Gospel to the nations living on its borders. James Marquette was born at Lann in 1637, entered the Jesuil Order in 3 R. S. Thwaites, Father Marquette, p. 160, <■!'. "The Journey of .lean Nicolel " by Father Vimont, 1634, in "Early Narratives of the Northwest," edited by Louise Phelps Kellogg, Ph. I). •* Ibidem, p. 4. Father James Marquette and M. Joliet 9 1654, was sent to the mission in Canada in 1666, and appeared in the west in 1669 at the mission of Pointe de St. Esprit, near the western end of Lake Superior. Here he received frequent visits from certain Illinois Indians, who had made a thirty days journey by land from their home which lay to the southwest of La Pointe, and "piteously entreated" him to visit their people. "They believe" wrote Father Marquette, "that I will spread peace everywhere I go." "When the Illinois come to La pointe, they pass a large river almost a league wide. It runs north and south and so far that the Illinois, who do not know what canoes are. have never yet heard of its mouth;" "If the Indians who promise to make me a canoe, do not fail to keep their word, we shall go into this river as soon as we can with a Frenchman. We shall visit the nations that inhabit it in order to open the way to so many of our Fathers who have long awaited this happiness." 5 In 1671 Father Marquette was forced by the threatened attack of the Sioux to fly with his band of Huron Christians to the shelter of St. Ignace on the northern side of the Strait of Mackinac. Here the great call to more heroic endeavor reached him. We will give his own words: "The Feast of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin — Whom I have always invoked since I have been in this country of the Ottowas, to obtain from God the grace of being able to visit the nations who dwell along the Mississippi River, was precisely the day on which Monsieur Joliet arrived with orders from Monsieur the Count de Frontenac, Our Governor, and Monsieur Talon, our Intendant, to undertake this discovery with me. I was all the more delighted at this good news, since I saw that my plans were about to be accomplished; and since I found myself in the blessed necessity of exposing my life for the salvation of all these peoples, and especially of the Illinois, who had very urgently entreated me, when I was at the Pointe De St. Esprit, to carry the word of God to their country. Accordingly, on the 17th day of May, 1673, we started from the Mission of St. Ignace at Michilimakinac, where I then was. 6 Above all, I placed our voyage under the protection of the Blessed Virgin Immaculate, promising her that, if she granted us the favor of discovering- the great river, I would give it the name of the Concep- 5 These quotations are taken from Relation 1669-70, Ottawa Part in Shea "Discovery and Exploration of the Mississippi Valley," pp. LIV-LVI, passim. G "Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents" edited Reuben Gold Thwaites, vol. 59, p. 89 — Doubt has been cast on the authenticity of Father Marquette's Narrative of 1673; yet whether it be Marquette's own work or, as Dr. Steck holds, "in sub- stance the account drawn up by Joliet and sent to Quebec to Marquette shortly before the latter 's second voyage to the Illinois Country, ' ' it can certainly be relied upon for the discoveries made and the events recorded. Cf. Steck, Rev. F. B., "The Joliet - Marquette Expedition, 1673," p. 312. ]() History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis tkm, and thai I would also make the first Mission that 1 should estab- lish among those new peoples, bear the same name. This I have actually done, among the Illinois." 7 Father Marquette was ready to start at once, undismayed by the glowing terms which some of the Indians, among whom he labored, set forth the relentless cruelty of the nations he was about to visit. "I shall gladly lay down my life for the salvation of souls," was the reply with which he silenced every suggestion of affectionate appre- hension. With Joliet as his principal companion and five others whose names have not reached our times, he set out on his adventurous expedition, in two birch-bark canoes from the bay of Lake Michigan now called (Jreen Bay. Ascending Fox River, in navigating which they encountered con- siderable difficulty, in consequence of the numerous rapids which obstruct its course, they reached a high point near its source: where they found a village consisting of three tribes, Miamis, Maskoutens, and Kikabous. Father Marquette was greatly consoled at seeing a handsome Cross erected in the middle of the village, and adorned with many white skins, red belts, and bows and arrows, which these good people had offered to the great Manitou (This is the name which they give to God). They did this to thank Him for having had pity on them during the winter, by giving them an abundance of game when they most dreaded famine.'"* The party continued their journey on the next day. They knew they stood upon the great divide between the valley of the great lakes and the valley of the mysterious river they were seeking. Father Marquette says: "We knew that, at three leagues from the Maskoutens, was a river which discharged into the Mississippi. We knew also that the direction we were to follow in order to reach it, was west- southwesterly. But the road is broken by so many swamps and small lakes that it is easy to lose one's way, especially as the river leading thither is so full of wild oats, that it is difficult to find the channel. For this reason we greatly needed our two guides, who safely conducted us to a portage of 2,700 paces, and helped us to transport our canoes to enter that river; after which they returned home, leaving us alone in this unknown country, in the hands of Providence." 9 Having passed over the portage which divided the Fox from the Wisconsin Rivers, they once more committed themselves to their frail barks, following the course of the river which flows westwardly, until they found them- selves floating on the bosom of the Father of Waters, on the 17th of June, Ki7:'>. Greal and inexpressible was the joy of Father Marquette. 7 Ibidem, p. 93. 8 "Jesuit Relations," vol. 59, p. 103. s "Jesuit Relations," vol. 59, p. 105. Father James Marquette and M. Joliet 11 But his labor had scarcely begun. On and on they drifted on the placid waters through scenes as fresh and beautiful and strange as if they had just been called forth from nothingness by the voice of God. It was a land of mountains and plains, of forests and prairies, of birds and beasts, but seemingly devoid of human life. "We continued to advance," says Father Marquette, "But as we knew not whither we were going, — for we had proceeded over one hundred leagues with- out discovering anything except animals and birds, — we kept well on our guard. On this account we made only a small fire on land, toward evening, to cook our meals; and, after supper, we remove ourselves as far from it as possible, and pass the night in our canoes, which we anchor in the river at some distance from the shore." 10 "Finally, on the 25th of June, we perceived on the water's edge some tracks of men, and a narrow and somewhat beaten path leading to a fine prairie. We stopped to examine it; and, thinking that it was a road which led to some village of savages, we resolved to go and reconnoiter it. We therefore left our two canoes under the guard of our people, strictly charging them not to allow themselves to be surprised; after which Monsieur Joliet and I undertook this investiga- tion — a rather hazardous one for two men who exposed themselves, alone, to the mercy of a barbarous and unknown people. We silently followed the narrow path, and after walking about two leagues, we discovered a village on the bank of a river, and two others on a hill distant about half a league from the first. We therefore decided that it was time to reveal ourselves. This we did by shouting with all our energy, and stopped, without advancing any farther. On hearing (lie shout, the savages quickly issued from their cabins, and having probably recognized us as Frenchmen, especially when they saw a black-gown, — or, at least having no cause for distrust, as we were only two men, and had given them notice of our arrival, — they deputed four old men to come and speak to us. Two of these bore tobacco- pipes, finely ornamented and adorned with various feathers. They walked slowly, and raised their pipes toward the sun, seemingly offering them to it to smoke, — without, however, saying a word. They spent a rather long- time in covering the short distance between their village and us. Finally, when they had drawn near, they stopped to consider us attentively. I was reassured when I observed these ceremonies, which with them are performed only among friends; and much more so, when I saw them clad in cloth, for I judged thereby that they were our allies. I therefore spoke to them first, and asked them who they were. They replied that they were Illinois ; and, as a token of peace, they offered us their pipes to smoke. They afterward invited us 10 "Jesuit Relations," vol. 59, p. 110. 12 History of tin Archdiocese of St. Louis to enter their village, where all the people impatiently awaited us. These pipes for smoking tobacco are called in this country Calumets." 11 "At the door of the cabin in which we were to be received was an old man, who awaited us in a rather surprising attitude, which constitutes a part of the ceremonial that they observe when they receive strangers. This man stood erect, and stark naked, with his hands extended and lifted toward the sun, as if he wished to protect himself from its rays, which nevertheless shone upon his face through his fingers. When we came near him, he paid us this compliment: "How beautiful the sun is, Frenchman, when thou comest to visit us! All our village awaits thee, and thou shalt enter all our cabins in peace." Having said this, he made us enter his own, in which were a crowd of people ; they devoured us with their eyes, but, nevertheless, observed profound silence. After we had taken our places, the usual civility of the country was paid to us, which consisted in offering us the Calumet. While all the elders smoked after us, in order to do us honor, we received an invitation on behalf of the great Captain of all the Illinois to proceed to his village where he wished to hold a Council with us. We went thither in a large company. For all these people, who had never seen any Frenchmen among them, could not cease looking at us. They lay on the grass along the road; they preceded us, and then retraced their steps to come and see us again. All this was done noiselessly, and with marks of great respect for us. 12 "Seeing all assembled and silent, I spoke to them by four presents that I gave them. By the first, I told them that we were journeying peacefully to visit the nations dwelling on the river as far as the sea. By the second, I announced to them that God, who had created them. had pity on them, inasmuch as, after they had so long been ignorant of Him, He wished to make Himself known to all the peoples ; that I sent by Him for that purpose; and that it was for them to acknowl- edge and obey Him. By the third, I said that the great Captain of the French informed them that He it was who restored peace every where j and that He had subdued the Iroquois. Finally, by the fourth we begged them to give us all the information that they had about the sea, and about the nations through whom we must pass to reach it. "When I had finished my speech, the Captain arose, and, resting his hand upon the head of a little slave whom he wished to give us, he spoke thus: 'I thank thee. Black Gown, and thee, Frenchman '~ addressing himself to Monsieur Joliet, — 'for having taken so much trouble to come to visit us. Never has the earth been so beautiful, or the sou so bright, as today; never has our river been so calm, or « "Jesuit Relations," vol. 50, p. 115. i^ "Jesuit Relations," vol. 59, p. 110. Father James Marquette and M. Joliet 13 so clear of rocks, which your canoes have removed in passing; never lias our tobacco tasted so good, or our corn appeared so fine, as we now see them. Here is my son, whom I give thee to show thee my heart. I beg thee to have pity on me, and on all my Nation. It is thou who knowest the great spirit who has made us all. It is thou who speakest to Him, and who nearest His word. Beg Him to give me life and health, and to come and dwell with us, in order to make us know Him.' " 13 This first meeting of white men and Illinois Indians in their home on the Mississippi took place on the northern bank of the Des Moines River 14 at its confluence with the Mississippi. The Illinois were a confederation of five tribes, with villages on both sides of the Great River. On Father Marquette's map as well as on that of Joliet (1674) the villages of the Illinois that were visited, are placed on the west side of the Mississippi. The main habitat, however, was Central Illi- nois. The Illinois are of the Algonquin stock, and Father Marquette, who had learnt five different Indian languages, was able to converse with them in their own. The reference to the Iroquois made a deep impression on all, as this cruel and warlike nation, or rather confederacy of nations, was then waging a war of extermination against all the more peaceful tribes of the lake-region, and threatening fierce inroads into the very country of the Illinois. Father Marquette's Journal contains many a word of high praise for his new friends and children. "Their bodies are shapely; they are active and very skillful with bows and arrows. They also use guns, which they buy from our savage allies who trade with our French. They use them especially to inspire, through their noise and smoke, terror in their enemies ; the latter do not use guns, and have never seen any, since they live too far toward the West." 15 Having received the Calumet, the pipe of peace, from his friends and having promised to visit their people in their ancestral home on the Illinois River, Father Marquette and his companions returned to their boats and abandoned themselves to the current. In the neighborhood of what is now the city of Alton they discovered a strange monument of ancient days. "While skirting some rocks, which by their height and length inspired awe, Ave saw upon one of them two painted monsters, which at first made us afraid, and upon which the boldest savages dare not long rest their eyes. They are as large as a calf; they have horns on their heads like those of deer, a horrible look, red eyes, a beard like a tiger's, a face somewhat like a man's, a body covered with scales, and so long a tail that it winds all around the body, passing above the head is "Jesuit Relations, " vol. 59, p. 121. 14 C. S. Weld in his "Joliet and Marquette in Iowa" maintains that this group of villages was not on the Des Moines but on the Iowa River, is "Jesuit Relations," vol. 59, p. 138. 14 History of the Archdiocese <>]' St. Louis and going back between the legs, ending in a fish's tail." 10 The explorers of the Mississippi were about to discover the mouth of its greatest tributary, the .Missouri. Father Marquette continues .-" While conversing about these monsters and sailing quietly in clear and calm water, we heard the noise of a rapid, into which we were about to run. 1 have seen nothing more dreadful. An accumulation of large and entire trees, branches, and floating islands, was issuing from the mouth of the river Pekitanoui, with such impetuousity that we could not, without great danger, risk passing through it. So great was the agitation that the water was very muddy, and could not become (dear." 17 Passing unharmed through this dangerous whirlpool, the little canoes- bore on with greater speed over the waters that washed the rocky shore whereon the great city of St. Louis was to rise in beauty at some far off date, passed the village of the Tamaroa on the eastern bank, greeted the little river that was to receive the flight of the Kaskaskias, and the Mission of the Immaculate Conception, skirted the grand tower that separated the river into two channels, and sped through the cross- current made by the mighty Ohio, the Beautiful River of later times. Pursuing their course without the occurrence of any incident until the party arrived at the mouth of the Arkansas River. "We had gone down to near the 33rd degree of latitude," says Father Marquette, "having proceeded nearly all the time in a southerly direction, when we perceived a village on the water's edge, called Mitchigamea. We had recourse to our Patroness and guide, the Blessed Virgin Immaculate; and we greatly needed her assistance, for we heard from afar the savages who were inciting one another to the fray by their continual yells. They were armed with bows, arrows, hatchets, clubs and shields. They prepared to attack us, on both land and water; part of them embarked in great wooden canoes — some to ascend, others to descend the river, in order to intercept us and surround us on all sides. Those who were on land came and went, as if to commence the attack. In fact, some young men threw themselves into the water, to come and seize my canoe; but the current compelled them to return to land. One of them then hurled his club, which passed over without striking us. In vain I showed the calumet, and made them signs that we were not. coming to war against them. The alarm continued, and they were already preparing to piei'ce us with arrows from all sides, when God suddenly touched the hearts of the old men, who were standing at the water's edge. This, no doubt, happened through the sight of our calumet, winch they had not clearly distinguished from afar; but as I did not cease displaying it, they were influenced by it, and checked the ardor of their young men. Two of these elders even,— after casting "Jesuit Relations," vol. 59, p. 139. "Jesuit Relations," vol. 50, p. 141. Father James Marquette and M. Joliet 15 into our eanoe, as if at our feet, their bows and quivers, to reassure us — entered the canoe, and made us approach the shore, whereon we landed, not without fear on our part. At first, we had to speak by signs, because none of them understood any of the six languages which I spoke. At last, we found an old man who could speak a little Illinois." 18 Father Marquette soon succeeded to conciliate them. He informed them that his party were going to the sea. He also spoke to them about God and about matters pertaining to their salvation. "This is a seed cast into the ground, which will bear fruit in due time" said the good Father. The Indians told them that there was another village called Akansea, eight or ten leagues lower down where they might obtain the information they desired. The exploring party embarked early on the following day and were kindly received. But from all they heard about the dangers of the way, and from clue consideration of the rapid depletion of their .stock of provisions, Marquette and Joliet determined on a homeward course. They had attained the object of their desires, they had dis- covered the great western river, they had floated down its broad expanse of water upwards of nine-hundred miles. Its unvaried southern direction could not be a matter of a moment's doubt; and that it debouched into the great Mexican Gulf was now satisfactorily ascer- tained. "We therefore reascend the Mississippi" writes Father Marquette, "which gives us much trouble in breasting its currents. It is true that Ave leave it, at about the 38th degree, to enter another river, the Illinois, which greatly, shortens our way, and takes us with but little effort to the lake of the Illinois," that is, Lake Michigan. 19 "We found on it a village of Illinois, called Kaskaskia, consisting of 74 cabins. They received us very well, and obliged me to promise that I would return to instruct them. One of the chiefs of this nation, with his young men, escorted us to the lake of the Illinois, whence, at last, at the end of September, we reached the Bay des Puants from which we had started at the beginning of June." 20 During the Fall and Winter Father Marquette wrote out copies of his Journal for his Superior, Father Claude Dablon, and then during the summer months recuperated at the Mission of St. Francis Xavier. Here he received orders to proceed to the Mission of the Immaculate Conception at Kaskaskia, and departed on the 25th of October 1674. Hampered by rain and hail and snow he crossed the portage from Sturgeon Bay to Lake Michigan; then, prevented by illness from traveling, he decided to winter on the river that leads to the Illinois. 21 Here in a wretched J» "Jesuit Relations," vol. 59, p. 151. io "Jesuit Relations," vol. 59, p. 161. 2" "Jesuit Relations," vol. 59, p. 162. 2 1 The Chicago River near the Portage. 16 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis cabin he said mass regularly and administered Holy Communion to his two eompanionSj Jacques and Pierre, shortly after Christmas, he and his companions made a Novena in honor of the [mmaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin, that he mighl have the grace to take possession of his mission among the Illinois. Their prayer was "•ranted, and, on the 29th day of March 1675, Father Marquette started for thai place with joy and. after eleven days on the way, arrived at his destination three days before Easter, "lie was received like an angel From heaven." But we musl let Father Dablon tell the splendid story of this reception. "After he had assembled at various times the chiefs of the nation, with all the old men, that he mighl sow in their minds the first seeds of the gospel, and after having given instruction in the cabins, which were always filled with a great crowd of people, he resolved to address all in public, in a general assembly which he called together in the open air, the cabins being too small to contain all the people. It was a beautiful prairie, close to a village, which was selected for the great C imcil; this was adorned, after the fashion of the country, by cover- ing it with mats and bearskins. Then the Father, having directed them to stretch out upon lines several pieces of Chinese taffeta, attached to these four large pictures of the Blessed Virgin, which were visible on all sides. The audience was composed of 500 child's and elders seated in a circle around the Father, and of all the young men, who remained standing. They numbered more than 1,500 men, without counting the women and children, who are. always numerous, — the village being composed of 5 or 600 fires. The Father addressed the whole body of people, and conveyed to them, ten messages, by means of ten presents which he gave them. He explained to them the principal mysteries of our Religion, and the purpose that had brought him to their country. Above all, he preached to them Jesus Christ, on the very eve (of that great day) on which He had died upon the Cross for them, as well as for all the rest of mankind; then he said Holy Mass. On the third day after, which was Easter Sunday, things being pre- pared in the same manner as on Thursday, he celebrated the holy mysteries for the second time; and by these two, the only sacrifices ever offered there to God, he took possession of that land in the name of Jesus Christ, and gave to that mission the name of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin. He was listened to by all those peoples with universal joy; and they prayed him with most earnest entreaty to come back to them as soon as possible, since his sickness obliged him to return. The Father, on his side, expressed to them the affection which he felt for them, and the satisfaction that they had given him; and pledged them his word that he, or some other of our Fathers, would return to carry on that mission so happily inaugurated. Father J nuns Marquette and M. J olid 17 This promise he repealed several limes, while parting with them to go upon his way; and he set out with so many tokens of regard on the part of those good peoples that, as a mark of honor, they chose to escort him for more than 30 leagues on the road, vying with each other in taking charge of his slender baggage." 22 In order to reach his home at St. [gnace Father Marquette with his two companions entered Lake Michigan and coasted along its southern and western shore, but he felt so feeble and exhausted that he was obliged to disembark from his canoe, and on the banks of what is since know as Pere Marquette River, he yielded up his spirit in the depths of the wilderness, thanking the Almighty far his mercy in permitting him to die in the Society of Jesus, alone amidst the forest. ! I is frail body was laid to rest in the spot his death had consecrated; but two years later was removed to the Mission of St. Ignace at \i.ickinack, where the hones were placed in a small vaidl in the middle of the church. "The savages often come to pray at his tomb," adds Father Claude Dablon. Father Marquette was succeeded in the Illinois Mission of the Immaculate Conception by Father Claude Allouez, his former Superior at the Pointe de Saint Esprit. In his sincere and deep humility Father Marquette never realized the vast significance of his discovery. He was glad to do a service to his* country France, but his greal delighl and comfort were the souls whom he had won for Christ. He resembled St. Francis Xavier, nut only in the variety of Barbarian languages, which he mastered, but also in the range of his zeal, which made him carry the faith to so many unknown nations, in the 7. when two ships, under the command of Lemoine D'Iberville and Chateaumorand, were fitted out for thai purpose. They set sail on the ITtli of October 1698 and on the 12th of January 1699 came in sight of the coast of Florida. Shortly afterwards Lemoine D'Iberville sailed for the .Mississippi, which he entered on the -lid of March and ascended as far as the present site of Donaldsonville and founded the Colony of Rosalie near the site of the City of Natchez. In 1718 his brother Bienville completed the peaceful conquest of Louisiana by the foundation of the great emporium of the South, New Orleans. This rapid review represents in rough out- lines the national background for the rising Church of God in the vast territory of the Mississippi and its tributaries. The progress of religion is slow and laborious. The immediate results are not great, as far as the records show. Yet missionary activities had accompanied i he entire voyage of LaSalle from Fort Frontenac to the mouth of the Mississippi; for as we have seen, Father Zenobe Mambre never let an occasion pass by without an appeal to the unima naturaliter chris- tiane, that he recognized in every savage he met. leather Gabriel Ribourde sealed his glowing zeal for the salvation of souls by martyrdom. Father Hennepin, after his deliverance from captivity by Du Lhulh, returned to Green Bay by way of the Wisconsin and Fox Rivers. In the following year he sailed for Europe and, at the convent of his order at St. Germaine-en-Laye, wrote his first book, the Louisiana. The name of Father Louis Hennepin has been clouded with the charge that he was a dreadful liar. Mr. Perkman has expressed the current opinion of him by saying: "His books have their value with all their enormous fabrications. Could he have contented himself with telling the truth, his name would have stood high as a bold and vigorous discoverer." 1 ' Father Hennepin's character, in no other respect, has been im- peached; and while in America, he bore the reputation of a fearless, circumspect, and self-denying priest. When stationed in Canada he would start out in the depth of winter with a little chapel service on his back, and travel twenty or thirty leagues on snow shoes, that he might baptize dying Indians and harden himself for his rough pioneer work. With two companions he explored, in 1680, the Mississippi River north from the mouth of the Illinois River, discovered the Falls of St. Anthony and wrote the earliest book of travels on the Northwest. The general truthfulness of this book the Louisiana has never been questioned; and its popularity has exceeded that of all other contemporary publications relating to North America. May there Parkman, " LaSalle and the Greal West," p. 137. LaSalle, Be Tonti and the Becollets 25 not be some mistake in the severe judgment which has been passed upon the character of Father Hennepin? That there were falsehoods and frauds in later publications which bore his name is true; but what part of the culpability for those frauds, if any, rests upon him, is a question which needs a new and careful investigation. Some of them are too glaring to have any appeal to a man of sense, such as Hennepin certainly was. One of the earliest, in some respect, the very earliest settle- ment of whites on the Mississippi River is the Post of Arkansas. LaSalle on his first voyage of discovery and conquest in 1682 made a grant of land on the Arkansas River to his ever-faithful lieutenant. Henri De Tonti. In 1686 Tonti took possession of his seigniory and built a log house, surrounded by palisades and left ten men to begin a settlement. This was the origin of Arkansas Post. The Post was still oceupied when tin- survivors of LaSalle 's party reached the place from Texas. In 1698 lie once more visited this furl in company of the Gentlemen of the Seminary of Quebec, Montigny, St. Cosine and Davion. In 1689 Tonti had made a grant of a tract of land in his seigniory to the Jesuits for the purpose of establishing a mission, promising to build a house and chapel for the missionaries. He also agreed to support a missionary for three years. The missionaries were to erect a cross fifteen feet high, instruct the Indians, encourage agriculture and say a mass for Tonti on St. Henry's day. After the death of Tonti, John Law, the "great financier", received a grant of twelve square miles near the Post of Arkansas. The Post itself was still maintained when Charlevoix visited the place in 1721. It was stipulated that the proprietor of the new colony should settle fifteen hundred Germans on the lands that had been granted to him, and that he should keep up, at his own expense, a body of infantry and cavalry sufficient to protect the colonists against the attacks of Indians. In the month of March 1721 two hundred immigrants arrived in the colony. But when they heard of Law's failure and disgrace they returned to New Orleans and demanded to be sent back to their Alsatian homes. But they were prevailed upon to stay. Large tracts of land were granted to them on the Mississippi, thirty miles above New Orleans, at the place that still bears the name of "German Coast." The first priest at the Post of Arkansas was the Jesuit du Poisson who came as missionary to the Indians and chaplain to the garrison 1727. As there was neither chapel nor house, the priest accepted the hospitality of the Commandant. "In 1729, on his way to New Orleans." as Father Watrin relates, "he stopped over at the village of the Natchez, on the very day which they had chosen for slaughtering the French, and was included in the general massacre. This conspiracy may well be compared to t lie Sicilian Vespers. The French established at that post treated with the. utmost insolence the nation of the Natchez, the most useful and 26 History of tht Archdiocest of St. Louis the most (Icvotcd to the colony; and they in turn undertook to avenge themselves. Father du Poisson had been requested to remain one day for some ministerial function which presented itself, in the absence of the cure; he consented to do it, and was the victim of his devotion and his charity." 7 The entire country in the neighborhood was, for a long time, in a disturbed condition, so that the place of Father du Poisson could not be filled. As Father Watrin in his letter on the Banishment of the Jesuits, records, "'one month afterward, Hie Vazous, another savage nation, having entered into the same conspiracy, also slew the French who lived near them. Father Souel, their missionary, was not spared j he was so beloved by the negro who served him that his faithful slave was killed in trying to defend or avenge his master. About the same time, Father D'Outreleau descended with several voyageurs from the Illinois country, for the affairs of the mission, and halted upon the hanks of the Mississippi, to say mass. A band of these same Yazous, who had killed Father Souel, arrived at the same place, with other savages, their allies; they watched the time when the French, and especially the Father, were occupied with the holy sacrifice, and they fired a volley from their guns, which killed some Frenchmen and wounded others. Father D'Outreleau received a wound in the arm and several grains of coarse shot in his mouth; it was regarded as a very remarkable effect of God's protection that he was only slightly wounded. This disaster did not dismay him ; his firmness reassured his fellow-travelers, and they escaped the savages and proceeded to New Orleans. Soon afterward, it was a question of avenging upon the barbarians the deaths of Hie French, especially of all those who had perished among the Natchez ; an army was sent thither, of which Father D'Outreleau was the chaplain, and in that employ he always condrcted himself in the same resolute manner." 8 There must have been Jesuit missionaries at the Post of Arkansas up to 1763, when Father Carette was forced to leave it by the contempt of all religion displayed by the officers and soldiers of the garrison. As there was no chapel nor house for the priest, mass had to be said in the mess-room of the Fort, a place made still more unsuitable by the rude manners and freedom of language boldly manifested by almost all. Soon after that, the Post of Arkansas received a Spanish Commandant. The Indians around the Post were called Quappas or Kappas. Remnants of them continued to live on the banks of the Arkansas River as late as Bishop Rosati 's time. 1 "Jesuit Relations," vol. 70, p. 247. 8 "Jesuit Relations," vol. 70, pp. 247-248. Chapter 4 ON THE ILLINOIS RIVER During the time of the construction of Fort Cr'eve Coeur until its destruction and the flight of the Frenchmen under De Tonti two Recollet Fathers, Gabriel Ribourde and Zenobius Mambre, were the representatives of the spiritual order among the French and the Indian Christians on the Illinois. Father Louis Hennepin had asked and received the commission to explore the Mississippi to the North, and he never returned to the Illinois. "The only great Illinois village being composed of seven or eight thousand souls," wrote Father Mambre, "Father Gabriel and I had a sufficient field for the exercise of our zeal besides the few French who soon after came there.'' 1 In addition to this great village there were a large number of small villages within their jurisdiction; those of the Miamis, the Ottowas, the Kickapoos and Iowas, the Mascoutens and Kaskaskias and Nadowissius. It was a strange mixture of tribes and a wide circuit of territory the Recollets claimed ; Yet there was no one there at the time to dispute it with them, though to the north there were a number of Jesuits engaged in the same work. "Father Gabriel and I," says Father Mambre, "devoted ourselves constantly to the mission." An Illinois named Asapieta adopted Father Gabriel as his son, so that the good Father found in his cabin a sub- sistence in the Indian fashion. "As wine failed for the celebration of the divine mysteries, we found means, towards the close of August, to get wild grapes which began to ripen, and we made very good wine." 2 With regard to conversions Father Mambre is rather pessimistic : "During the whole time Father Gabriel unraveled their language a little, and I spoke so as to make myself understood by the Indians ; but there is in these savages such an alienation from the Faith, so brutal and narrow a mind, such corrupt and anti-christian morals, that great time would be needed to hope for any fruit. It is true, I found many of quite docile character" 3 "During the summer we followed the Indians in their camps, and to the chase. I also made a voyage to the Miamis, to learn something about their disposition; thence I went to visit other villages of Illinois, all however, with no great success." 4 Whilst all seemed quiet and peaceful, Father Mambre living in the Indian village, Father Gabriel Ribourde in the Fort, and M. De i "Discovery and Exploration of the Mississippi Valley," by John Gilmarv Shea, (2nd Ed.) p. 154. 2 ' ' Discovery and Exploration, ' ' p. 156. 3 "Discovery and Exploration," p. 157. 4 "Discovery and Exploration," p. 157. (27) History of the Archdiocest of St. Louis Tonti busily engaged in completing the Port of St. Louis on the rock higher up the river, there came the warning: the [roquois are coming. All'was confusion in the village, and Fori Creve Coeur was in ruins. The brave Tonti soughl to bring about a cessation of hostilities. He approached the invaders holding up a bead necklace as a sign of peace. He did not succeed to calm the bloodthirsty spirits on both sides. The [roquois chief who had interposed between Tonti and a murderous youth who had stabbed him, now took the peacemaker by the arm and told him to go. Tonti gathered around him the two priests and the few remaining Frenchmen and started in an old canoe for the north. On this journey Father Gabriel Ribourde"' fell a vielini of his zeal and piety, by the hand of a KickapOO. Father Mambre returned to the Illinois village in due time intent upon making the voyage of discovery down the Mississippi to the Gulf with LaSalle and Tonti and to return with them to the Illinois in 1682. But LaSalle and Tonti and Mambre also were detained for (he winter on the Rock of the Illinois, which was now crowned with the Fori St. Louis. There was a chapel in the fort, where Father Mambre said mass for the French until the departure of LaSalle for Quebec and l'aris. Tonty remained behind as com- mandant. It was now that, the -Jesuit Fathers came into their own once more. Father Allouez had kept his promise, though Ins coming was belated. When he arrived is stated nowhere. Bui the fact, of his presence is certain. Joutel, in his book on "M de LaSalle's Second Voyage" states on two occassions that the Jesuit Father Allouez was at Fort St. Louis among the Kaskaskia as late as March 1(!88. He was sick at the time, when the companion-, of LaSalle's second voyage Father Cavelier, Mambre and M. -Joutel visited him. Father Allouez soon after this visit, left the place for Mackinac, where there was a residence of three Jesuil missionaries. Father Allouez's immediate successor in the Illinois mission was the Apostle of the Abnakis, Lather Sebastian Kale, who spent two years, 1692 to lt;!)4, along the Illinois River. In Kaskaskia, then a village of three hundred wigwams, he received a hearty welcome. The mission- ary was delighted. "The mosl skilful European, after much thoughtful siiidy," he said, "could not produce a more pertinent or beautiful discourse" than the head-sachem who addressed him. Tn his two 5 Father Ribourde was ;i scion of one (if the noble louses of Burgundy, tic was among the firsl Reeollets to eome to Canada in the summer of l<;7e. He had been Fathei Confessor to Count Frontenac. Tin' date of his death is September 0, L680. He was then in the seventieth year of his age, fort} of which has 1 a spent in the religious st ite. o "Sebastian Rale" bj Couvers Francis, D. D., in "Spark's American Biogra phy, in v, series, vol. VIII, p. 17s, Father Rale's letters may be found in "Earlj resuil Missions in North America," by the Rev. William [ngraham Kip, as well as in the ' ' Jesuit Relat ions. On tin Illinois h'iri r 29 letters Father Rale gives many interesting notices of Indian life at that place. The dance was an expression of both sorrow and joy. To be a good hunter was much, but to be a good warrior was more. It was a high honor to return home laden Avith many scalps. Torturing the prisoners of war was common among them. Polygamy made the men averse to the teachings of the Father, although they did not object to having their wives and children attend instructions, and being baptized. About 1687 Father Rasles, as the name is sometimes written, was recalled to the Abnaki Mission in Maine where he met his death at the hands of English soldiers. Father James Gravier, who had visited the Illinois Mission as early as 1687 received it from Father Rale. He erected a chapel within Fort St. Louis on the Rock of the Illinois. His Relation of the occurrences at the Mission of the Immaculate Conception of the Illinois from March 20th, 1693, to February 15th, 1694, presents an interesting view of his toils and trials among these Indians. Yet, nothing daunted by the insurmountable obstacles placed in his way, he continued with indefatigable zeal to instruct the ignorant, heal the sick, warn the wayward and curb the proud. As to the educational methods pursued by the missioners. Father Gravier, the Superior, gives us an interesting explanation: "To the adults I explained the whole of the Xew Testament, of which I have cop' er plate engravings repre- senting perfectly what is related on each page.' -7 The grace of God was slowly hut surely making its way in ever widening circles. "AYhat surprised me most," writes the Father, '"is the assiduous perseverance of the young men. The most arrogant became like children at Catechism. When the young men are in the lodges of their chiefs, they sing, night and day, chants that instruct them and keep them occupied.'" Yet the Peorias were holding back, their chief being one of the most impudent jugglers. The Mission of the Immaculate Conception among the Illinois founded by Marquette in 1675. had its center in the shadow of Fort St. Louis on the Rock of the Illinois, also called Starved Rock. This is near the site of the present city of Ottowa. Twenty years later it was at the village of the Peorias. where the Illinois River emerges from the Lake of Peoria through a narrow rocky channel called the Strait. All the Indians living between these two points and in all the surround- ing country were considered members of the Mission. Many of them however refused the missionary's teachings and remained addicted to their manitous and their vaunted free life. For a long time, Father Gravier 's patient zeal produced but slight results. At last there came a chance for the better. The great chief of the Kaskaskia tribe, Rouensa by name, whilst still a pagan wished to marry his daughter who was " "Jesuit Kelations, " vol. 64, p. 227. '••I"4, passim. On the Illinois River 31 were a Catholic tribe. Father Gravier was anxious to keep them all together in the same mission because he hoped the good example of the one -would at last overcome the evil propensities of the others. His successor, probably, was of a different opinion : So, it seems, the religious indifference and persecuting spirit of the Peorias was one of the con- tributing causes of the exodus of the Kaskaskia from their ancient homes on the Illinois. When Father Marest arrived in the Illinois country in 1698, to continue the good work of Father Gravier, he wrote to a Father of his Society: "The state of religion here is as follows: but few among the men embrace Christianity ; the young men especially live in excessive licentiousness, which renders them incapable of listening to the mission- aries. The women and girls are very well disposed to receive baptism ; They are constant and firm when once they have received it ; they are fervent in prayer, and ask only to be instructed ; they frequently approacb the sacraments and, finally, are capable of highest sanctity. The number of those who embrace our boly religion increases daily to a marked degree — so much so that Ave have been obliged to build a new church, and judging from the manner in which this one is filled every day I think we shall shortly need a third The children give us bright hopes for the future. When they return from instructions to their cabins they tell their fathers what they have learned." 11 Here is a description of the life we lead," wrote the good priest in bis letter from the Illinois country in New France under date of the 29th of April 1699, "Every day, before sunrise, we say mass for the con- venience of our Christians who go from it to their work. The savages chant their prayers or recite them together during mass, after which we disperse in different directions to teach the children the Catechism. After that we visit the sick. On our return, we always find several savages who come to consult us on various matters. Saturdays and Sundays are completely occupied in hearing confessions." 12 As Father Gravier was called away from the mission by his official duties as Superior and Vicar General, two distinguished men came to aid Father Marest. Father Julian Binneteau arrived at the Peoria village in 1697, in company of Father Francis Pinet, the founder of the Mission of the Guardian Angel within the bounds of the present city of Chicago, 1696. As Father Pinet had been dispossessed by LaSalle of this mission, he went to the Tamarois, who had joined the Cahokia on the bottom lands opposite the site of the future city of St. Louis. Father Gravier wrote to the venerable Bishop Laval a few words of protest against the action of LaSalle, and the threats of Count "Jesuit Relations," vol. 65, p. 81. "Jesuit Relations," vol. 65, p. 81 s. .'51' History of I In Archdiocese of SI. Louis Frontenac: "Nothing lias more comforted me, Monseigneur, than t he kind manner which Your Grace was pleased to manifesl to me. II' Monseigneur of Quebec, (Bishop Vallier) has the same sentiment for us, we all hope we shall perform our duties in our Ottowa missions more peacefully than we have done for some years. We shall also be safe from the threats of M. the Count de Frontenac, to drive us from our Mission as he had already done from that of the Angel Guardian of the Miamis, at Chicagwa, the charge of which Monseigneur of Quebec bad confided to me, confirming the powers that Your Grace had conferred upon Father Marquette and Father Allouez, who were the first missionaries of those southern nations, namely the Illinois. Miamis and Sioux. If M. the Count of Frontenac had learned that in our Missions we had done anything' unworthy of our ministry, he could easily have applied to Monseigneur the Bishop, or his Grand Vicar. But he could not otherwise than by violence drive us from our mission. We hope that Monseigneur of Quebec will not suffer such violence." 13 Father Binneteau in 1699, gives an account of the virtuous woman- hood among the Illinois. "The women and girls have strong inclina- tions to virtue, although according to custom they are the slaves of their brothers, who compel them to marry whomsoever they choose. There are many households where husband and wife live in great fervor, without heeding what the jugglers or the young Libertines say. There are some women married to some of our Frenchmen, who would be a good example to the best regulated household in France." The good old Father also gives high praise to his companion in the mission, lately arrived. "Father Gabriel Maresl is doing wonders: he has the best talent in the world for these missions. lie has learned the language in four or five months, he can hear an incredible amount of fatigue, and his zeal leads him to look upon the most difficult things as 1 rifles. 'I will never rest," he says, 'as lung as I live.' From morning until night our house is never empty of people who come to b*e instructed and to confess. We had to enlarge our chape's." 11 In January 1699, Father Binneteau, now again at the mission near Peoria Lake, recalls his journey of the previous year: "I am at present spending the winter with a portion of our savages who are scattered about, I have recently been with the Tamarois, to visit a band of them on the bank of one of the largest rivers in the world -which, for this reason, we call the Mississippi, or 'the (ireat River.' Mure than seven hundred leagues of it have been found to he navigable, without is ''.Jesuit Relations," vol. 65, p. 53. 14 "Jesuit Relations," vol. 65, p. 69. On the Illinois River 33 discovering its source. I am to return to the Illinois of Tamarois in the spring. ' ' l5 Both Binneteau and Pinet made this journey, and claimed the Tamarois mission as their own. The Seminary priests were greatly surprised : but a temporary arrangement was made : Father Pinet the Jesuit was to have charge of the Indians, whilst Father Bergier, one of the Seminary priests, held charge of the French in the place. Father Binneteau now returned to the mission on Peoria Lake, to resume his usual round of visits to the scattered neophytes on the praires adjoining the Illinois River. To follow the Indians in their excursions was one of the severest trials of the missionary. The summer hunt was especially fatigu- ing, says Father Marest; "it cost the life of the late Father Binneteau. He accompanied the savages in the greatest heat of the month of July ; sometimes he was in danger of smothering amid the grass, which was extremely high ; sometimes he suffered cruelly from thirst. By day he was drenched with perspiration and at night he was obliged to sleep on the ground. These hardships brought upon him a violent sickness, from which he expired in my arms." 16 When death came Father Marest does not tell. But from other sources it appears that Father Binneteau lingered on throughout the fall of the year 1799. "Father Binneteau died from exhaustion," writes Father Gravier, "but if he had a few drops of Spanish wine, for which he asked us during his last illness, or had we been able to procure some fresh food for him, he would perhaps be still alive." 17 According to Rochemonteix, Father Binneteau died on the eve of Christmas 1699, at the Kaskaskia Village on Peoria Lake, and was buried there by his companions Marest and Pinet, of whom Father Gravier said on this occasion. "Father Pinet and Father Marest are wearing out their strength; and they are two saints, who take pleasure of being deprived of everything, in order, as they say, that they may soon be nearer to Paradise." 18 But there was much work still awaiting the two heroic souls: Father Marest to prepare the great exodus of the Kaskaskias to the Mississippi, and Father Pinet to await them at Tamarois. i"' "Jesuit Relations," vol. 65, p. 71. The name is sometimes spelled, and always pronounced Tamaroa. is "Jesuit Eelations," vol. 66, p. 253. 17 "Jesuit Relations," vol. 66, p. 25. is "Jesuit Eelations," vol. 66, p. 37. Vol. 1—2 Chapter 5 THE GENTLEMEN OF THE SEMINARY OF QUEBEC The earliest missionaries among the Indians of Canada and on the great lakes depended for their authority directly on the Holy See. They were the Greyrohes or Recollets and the Blackrobes or Jesuits. When Canada came under British rule for the first time (1629-1634) most of the priests withdrew to France, and when England restored the province to France, only the Jesuits returned to their former posts; the Recollets being debarred until August 18, 1670, as a counter balance to the Jesuits. The Sulpicians arrived somewhat later when all Canada was subject to the Bishop of Rouen, in Normandy. These were the religious Orders that took part in the earliest movements to conquer the Mississippi Valley for Christ. Now in 1694 we see another company of missionaries hurrying over the same route that had brought the Recollets with LaSalle down the Mississippi to the further-most point that had been reached by Marquette : They are usually called the Gentlemen of the Seminary, or the Seminary Priests, officially, the Society of Foreign Missions of the Seminary of Quebec. They were Fathers Francis Joliet de Montigny, Antoine Davion, Jean Francois Buisson de St. Cosme, a native of Canada. De Montigny was the Vicar-General of the party. Dominic Anthony Thaumer de la Source 1 was, like the younger St. Cosme, no priest, but a companion of the voyage, who wrote an account of the events he had witnessed in 1719. He returned to Quebec and resumed his studies and later on joined the mission at Cahokia. The party had the usual complement of voyageurs and coureurs de hois, twenty persons in all. Father John Bergier was not of Montigny 's party, although a priest of the Seminary of Quebec. He probably reached the Tamarois before the advent of his fellow priests, who were delayed by the Indians of the Fox River. This missionary expedition was sent out by the first Bishop of Quebec, Francois Laval de Montmorency, commonly called Bishop Laval, who had been appointed in 1657, and had resigned in 1674. But owing to the troubles of his successor, Bishop Vallier, with the English as well as with the French governments, he was forced to resume the reins once more in Vallier 's place. Having founded the Seminary of Quebec, Bishop Laval always manifested a deep interest in its "varying fortunes. Thus it came about that the three Gentlemen of the Seminary were sent to the Mississippi. At Mackinac they had the good fortune to meet with the Sieur de Tonti, the ever-faithful friend of LaSalle, who quickly came to the resolution i Cf. U. E. Dionne, Gabriel Richard, Quebec, 1911. Notes a1 end. (34) The Gentlemen of the Seminary of Quebec 35 to accompany them as far as the Arkansas. St. Cosme in his letter 2 addressed "to the Bishop," expresses the heartfelt gratitude for De Tonti's services to the priests: "He has not only done the duty of a brave man, but also discharged the functions of a zealous missionary. ' ' 3 In the mission of St. Ignace at Mackinac the new missionaries were kindly received by the Jesuits Gravier and Careil, being charmed with the good judgment, the zeal and modesty of M. de Montigny, St. Cosme and M. Davion. 4 With kindly instructions to Father Pinet and Father Binneteau at the Illinois, they departed down the western shore of Lake Michigan. Owing to bad weather the three gentlemen from the Seminary landed a few miles north of the Mission of the Angel Guardian and, leaving the rest of the company by the lake-shore, made their way on foot to the home of Father Francis Pinet. From here on Father St. Cosme is the spokesman of the party : ' ' Many travel- lers have already been wrecked there, ' ' he writes. ' ' We, M. de Montigny, Davion, and myself, went by land to the house of the Reverend Jesuit Fathers, while our people remained behind. We found there Reverend Father Pinet, and Reverend Father Binneteau, who had recently arrived from the Illinois country and was slightly ill." 5 The joy of priests meeting priests in the deep solitude of earliest Chicago, was great and sincere. "I cannot describe to you, my lord, with what cordiality and manifestations of friendship these Reverend Fathers received and embraced us, while we had the consolation of residing with them," 6 wrote Father St. Cosme, and then proceeded to give a clear and succinct description of the place: "Their house is built on the bank of a small river, with the lake on one side and a fine and vast prairie on the other. The village of the savages contains over a hundred and fifty cabins, and a league up the river is still another village almost as large. They are all Miamis. Reverend Father Pinet usually resides there except in the winter, when the savages are all engaged in hunting, and then he goes to the Illinois. We saw no savages there. They had already started for their hunt. If one may judge of the future from the short time Father Pinet has passed in this mission, we may believe that, if God will bless the labors and the 2 The letter of St. Cosme, from which almost all the facts narrated in this chapter are taken, lay hidden for 160 years among the literary treasures of Laval University, Quebec, and was discovered in the middle of the 19th century by the great Catholic Historian John Gilmary Shea. It was published by him in French and English, New York, 1861. It was republished in Shea's "Early Voyages Up and Down the Mississippi," and with some corrections in Louise Phelps Kellogg 's "Early Narratives of the North-West, 1634-1699." We follow the later edition. 3 Kellogg, p. 343. * "Jesuit Relations," vol. 65, p. 59. s Kellogg, p. 346. e Kellogg, p. 346. .'Ui History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis zeal of the holy missionary, there will be a great number of good and fervenl Christians. It is true, that but slight results are obtained with reference to the older persons, who are hardened in profligacy, but all the children are baptized, and the jugglers even, who are the most opposed to Christianity, allow their children to be baptized. They are also very glad to let them be instructed. Several girls of a certain age, and also many young boys have already been and are being instructed, so thai we may hope that, when the old stock dies off, they will be a new and entirely Christian people." 7 The entire party left Chicago for the Illinois country, but a part of their belongings had to remain behind in care of Brother Alexander and Father Pinet's servant. When they came to the portage of the Kankakee River, the party was divided by an untoward circumstance, as recorded by Father St. Cosine. "Messieurs de Montigny, De Tonti, and Davion continued the portage on the following day, while I, St. Cosme with four other men. went back to look for the little boy, (who had wandered away into the prairie). While retracing my steps, I met Father Pinet and Binneteau, who were on the way to the Illinois with two Frenchmen and a savage. We looked for the boy during the whole of that day also, without finding him." 8 "We arrived on the 15th of November at the place called the Old Fort. This is a rock on the bank of the river, about a hundred feet high, whereon Monsieur de LaSalle had caused a fort to be built, which had been abandoned, because the savages went to reside about twenty-five leagues further down. We slept a league above it, where we found two cabins of savages ; Ave were consoled on finding a woman who was a thoroughly good Christian. The distance between Chicagou and the fort is considered to be about thirty leagues. There we commenced the navigation, that continues to be always good as far as the fort of Permetaoi, 9 where the savages now are and which we reached on the 19th of November. We found there Reverend Father liinneteau and Reverend Father Marest who, owing to their not being laden when they left Chicagou, had arrived six or seven days before us. We also saw Reverend Father Pinet there. All the Reverend Jesuit Fathers gave us the best possible reception. Their sole regrel was to see us compelled to leave so soon on account of the frost. We took there a Frenchman who had lived three years with the Aeansas and who knows a little of their language." Father St. Cosme had but words of the highest praise for the Jesuit Fathers: "This Mission of the Illinois seems to me the finest that the Reverend Jesuit Fathers have up here, for without counting all the children who are baptized, a number of adults have abandoned all their superstitions and live as thoroughly ■ Kellogg, p. 347. s Kellogg, p. 348. o A Fort on Lake Peoria, the early name of this lake was Pimetoui. The Gentlemen of the Seminary of Quebec 37 £oocl Christians; they frequently attend the sacraments and are married in church. We had not the consolation of seeing all these good Christians often, for they were all scattered down the bank of the river for the purpose of hunting. We saw only some women savages married to Frenchmen who edified us by their modesty and their assiduity in going to prayer several times a day in the chapel. We chanted High Mass in it, with deacon and sub-deacon, on the feast of the Presentation of the most Blessed Virgin, and after commending our voyage to her and having placed ourselves under her protection, we left the Illinois on the 22nd of November — we had to break the ice for two or three arpents to get out of Lake Permetaoi. We had four canoes ; that of Monsieur De Tonti, our two, and another belonging to five young voyageurs who were glad to accompany us, partly on account of Monsieur De Tonti, who is universally beloved by all the voyageurs, and partly also to see the country. Keverend Fathers Binneteau and Pinet also came with us a part of the way, as they wished to go and spend the whole winter with their savages." 10 Their last act of kindness to the Missionaries was a very practical one: Father Marest writes: "As these gentlemen did not know the Illinois language, we gave them a collection of prayers and a translation of the Catechism, with the notes that we have been able to make upon that language." 11 On the first day of their voyage the party came to the cabin of the Great Chief of the Kaskaskias, Rouensa, who with his whole family received Holy Communion at Father Montigny's mass. From Rouensa they heard of the recent attack made by the Chouanons and Chicasaws on a hunting party of the Cahokia Indians, an Illinois tribe with its chief village on the Mississippi below the Missouri. When later on the party visited that village some old men came to meet them, weeping for the death of their people killed by the Chouanons who, as they charged, had been furnished with fire-arms by Tonti. Tonti tried to convince them of his innocence in this matter, but not succeeding, led an immediate retreat to a place about ten miles down the stream. The following day they were detained for some hours owing to quantities of drifting ice in the river, and on the 28th of November they landed at a village governed by a woman chief. The priests said mass the following morning in the cabin of a soldier named La Violette, who was married to a savage, and whose child Father de Montigny baptized. Leaving this village the party spent four days in accomplishing about twenty miles. On the Feast of St. Xavier, December 3rd, a heavy gale broke up the ice and they embarked once more, and on December 5th, they reached the mouth of the Illinois River. On the next day they began their voyage on the mighty Father of Waters. Soon they in Kellogg, pp. 350, 351. ii "Jesuit Relations," vol. 65, p. 281. 38 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis passed the mouth of the great River of the Missouri, the vastness and muddiness of whose waters they could not help to note. "It is reported," Father St. Cosme wrote, "that there are great numbers of savages on the upper reaches of that river." 12 They also marvelled at the strange images on the rock above Alton. On the 7th day of December they reached Cahokia, where the chief with some of his people met the visitors on the water edge, and invited them to his villages inhabited by another tribe of the Illinois, and also having a colony of French traders and hunters. The Cahokias had been harrassed lately by war- parties of Shawnees and Chicasaws and were in consequence rather suspicious of the newcomers' intentions. Tonti went there with the chief, but the Fathers, wishing to prepare for the Feast of the Immacu- late Conception, camped on the other side of the river on the site of the future metropolis of the Mississippi Valley, the city of St. Louis. The following morning Father Montigny, Davion and St. Cosme each said mass on a stone altar they had prepared on the high river-bank, probably at the foot of Arsenal Street. It was the great Feastday of the Immaculate Mother of God, in whose honor Father Marquette had bestowed her most glorious title on the great river he had discovered. "Every Missourian, and especially every St. Louisian" says Father Garraghan, "will look back in a spirit of solemn pride on that memorable day when the site that was to see the growth of the first city of the State passed from out the night of prehistoric darkness into the clear sunshine of recorded history;" the 8th day of December 1698, "the day of the three masses." 13 On the 9th the whole company visited the village of the Tamarois. They were received with every mark of respect and wonder. How large the tribe really was could not be learnt. Father St. Cosme thought there were very many of them. "There would be enough," says he, "for a rather fine mission, by bringing to it the Kaskaskias, who live quite near, and the Mechigamias, who live a little lower down the Mississippi." 14 These three tribes were found to speak the Illinois language. On the 25th of November the Seminary priests had parted from Father Pinet who was to spend the winter with the Tamarois, to make a visit to that tribe assembled on the island lower than the village. Leaving the Tamarois on the afternoon of the Feast of the Immaculate Conception the missionaries departed and for more than three days saw nothing worthy of notice save a solitary hill at a distance of about three arpents on the right side going down. Father St. Cosme further says, that they were detained on Deeember 11th, 12 Kellogg, p. 355. 13 Garraghan, Gilbert J., S. J., "Some High Lights in Missouri History," ' St. Louis Catholic Historical Review, ' ' vol. Ill, p. 234. I* Kellogg, p. 356. The Gentlemen of the Seminary of Quebec 39 1698 by rain. This, of course, signifies that the party was forced to camp nearby, a circumstance that would account for the fact that the name Saint Cosme remains attached to the spot. The hill of which the missionary speaks is still known as Cape Saint Cosme; and the name of the Creek that washes that part of the hill, Cinque Hommes Creek, is but a late corruption of the name of its discoverer, Saint Cosme. 18 Early in the morning of the 12th of December they arrived at Cape Saint Antoine, a rocky bluff on the left bank going down, now known as Fountain Bluff. Some arpents below there is another rock on the right bank, which projects into the river and towards an island or rather a rock about one hundred feet high, which makes the river turn very short, and narrows the channel, causing a whirlpool on which, it is said, canoes are lost during high water. This has caused the spot to be dreaded by the savages, who are in the habit of offering sacrifices to that rock when they pass. 16 This is now, called Grand Tower. It was here that one of the usual great ceremonies of raising the Cross of Christ was performed by the missionaries, as Father Saint Cosme tells us: "We ascended this island or rock with some difficulty by a hill and we planted a fine cross on it chanting the hymn Vexilla Regis, while our people fired three discharges of their guns. God grant that the Cross that has never yet been known in this place, may triumph here, and that our Lord may abundantly spread the merits of His Holy Passion, so that all these savages may know and serve Him." 17 Father Saint Cosme 's prayer was answered in a manner he may not have thought of at the time, but more fully than he had anticipated. For almost within sight of one standing by that cross, the Seminary of St. Mary of the Barrens was to rise in the distant future and send out, year by year, new bands of youthful messengers of the Gospel into the benighted world around. The missionaries left Cape Saint Antoine on the 14th of December, passed the mouth of the Ohio on the 16th, and on the is The correct spelling of the word is Cinq Hommes, but the correct name is St. Cosme, pronounced Saint Come. Cf . ' ' St. Louis Catholic Historical Eeview, ' ' vol. Ill, p. 301. io The "Grand Tower" was described by Schoolcraft in his Journal of a Voyage up the Mississippi Kiver from the mouth of the Ohio to St. Louis, started July 1, 1818; "Grand Tower is a stupendous pile of rocks, rising out of the river, nearly midway in the stream, of a form nearly circular and rising somewhat in the shape of a cone, to the height of about 150 feet, and capped by a stunted growth of cedars. It seems in connection with the rock-shores on either side, to have at some former period, a barrier to the progress of the Mississippi, which must here have had a perpendicular base of more than 100 feet. By some convulsion of nature, or the continued power of friction, acting for centuries upon the lime-stone rock the Mississippi has forced its way through that barrier, leaving the Grand Tower as a perpetual monument of that sublime physical revolution." Journal, p. 229 and 230. 17 Kellogg, p. 357. 40 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis 24th, arrived at their destination among the Arkansas Indians. At midnight they had Solemn High Mass, and during the morning they said their masses, in the afternoon they chanted Vespers. . They were greatly surprised to feel and see the earth tremble, the earthquake being rather severe and sharp. 18 The Quappas or Kappas were the first Arkansas tribe they encountered. "These savages" says Saint Cosme, "seem to be of a very kind disposition. Their honesty is extra- ordinary. Polygamy is not common among them." 19 The mission- aries then visited the Tonicas and the Taensas. Father Davion was appointed missionary among the Tonicas, who numbered about two thousand souls. Father Montigny remained for a short while among the Taensas. Father Saint Cosme went up the river to the Tamarois to gain the martyr's crown shortly after his arrival there. 20 Dominic Thaumer de la Source, who is not mentioned in the letter of Father Saint Cosme, announced his arrival at the Akankas in company with the Gentlemen of the Seminary and of Father Montigny 's intention of sending him to the Tamarois with St. Cosme, that is, a younger brother of Father St. Cosme, not in priestly orders. Charlevoix found him, a missionary priest at Cahokia in 1727. Father Montigny the leader of the voyage is described by John Gilmary Shea as "impetuous, ardent, but easily dis- couraged." 21 Of Father Davion the Historian of Louisiana, Gayarree, 22 relates that he had constructed and hung up a pulpit to the trunk of an immense oak, growing on a gentle slope which commanded the river. Back of the tree he had raised a little Gothic chapel, the front part of which was divided by the mighty tree to which it was attached, with two diminutive doors opening into the edifice, on either side of that turn. It was done in imitation of the stone towers which stand like sentinels to guard the entrance to the temple of God. "In the chapel," Gayarre says, "Father Davion kept all the sacred -vessels, the holy water and the sacerdotal habiliments. There he used to retire to spend hours in meditation and prayer. In that tabernacle was a small portable altar which, whenever he said mass for the natives, was transported outside, under the oak, where they often met to the is Kellogg, p. 358, a premonition of the devastating earthquake of 1811. is Kellogg, p. 359. 20 Father St. Cosme after writing his letter from the Arkansas, returned to Cahokia. A few years later on his way down the river, he was murdered by a war party of Chitimacha Indians. The guilty chiefs were captured and executed by Iberville. Cf. Bernard de la Harpe, "Journal Historique, " p. 28. 2i Cf . Shea, ' ' The Church in Colonial Days, p. 544. 22 Gayarre, "History of Louisiana, The French Domination," vol. I, p. 64. The Gentium a of the Seminary of Quebec 41 number of three or four hundred. One day they found him dead at the foot of the altar, still retaining his kneeling position." 23 The Jesuits of the Illinois Mission, in their letters, speak with a cer- tain reserve of the purpose and the results of the mission of the Seminary Priests. Gravier thinks they came to take over all the Jesuit missions in the Illinois country. Pinet's foundation of Cahokia was occupied by Bergier. Gravier 's powers as Vicar- General were withdrawn, as Bergier claimed them. The Semi- nary priests had really accomplished very little. Even Father Davion abandoned his mission for fear of the English and of the savages, their enemies, although he later on returned to the Tonikas and labored among them for eighteen years. We can sympathize with Father Gravier, when after so many years of hard service he sees his work imperiled by men who were really of good will. "I am convinced" he writes to Father Lamherville in Paris, "that these missions will receive rude shocks. They are beginning to be on a good footing. This caused jealousy in the minds of the Gentlemen of the Foreign Missions, who have come to take them from us." 24 But time, with its healing balm, gradually restored a better feeling between these men of God engaged in the same glorious work. - 3 "History of Louisiana, vol. I, p. G7. According to Father Gravier, Davion seems to have been near death's door shortly after his arrival. ''Monsieur de St. Cosme, who had heard that Monsieur Davion was dying, arrived from the Natchez Mission. Before my departure, they both confirmed the news of the wreck of Father de Limoges, — who, out of all that he possessed, saved only his Chalice and his Crucifix." "Jesuit Relations, " vol. 65, p. 10. 2< "Jesuit Relations,'' vol. fifl, p. 85. Chapter 6 THE KASKASKIAS ON THE RIVER DES PERES The year 1700 saw, "the second founder of the Illinois Missions," as Father Marest calls Father James Gravier, embark on a voyage to the mouth of the Mississippi on matters of great importance to his Order and the missions entrusted to his care. The same year also witnessed the secession of the Kaskaskia tribe from that of the Peoria, who to- gether had formed the Mission of the Immaculate Conception of Father Marquette. A fateful year it proved to be to the Tamarois, another branch of the Illinois nation, in as far as the migration of the Kaskaskia drew them along to new homes. Before the year 1700 we find the Kaskaskia on the borders of the Illinois River, either at the Rock of the Illinois or farther south, on lake Peoria; after 1700 they are no longer in their ancient village; and in 1712 we hear of their having been estab- lished for some time near the junction of the Okaw River with the Mississippi, on a mission called the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin. The missionary who was with them on the Illinois, Father Marest, is with them still. How did all this come about? And where did the Kaskaskia and Tamarois sojourn during those two or three years that intervened between the first and second Kaskaskia. Father Garraghan S.J. has so clearly and beautifully answered the latter question in his resume of Father Kenny's elaborate argument on "Missouri's earliest settlement and its name," that I cannot forbear giving it entire: "On the north bank of the river De Peres at its junction with the Mississippi, just within the south limits of the city of St. Louis, there existed for a few years subsequent to 1700 a French-Indian settlement, Missouri's earliest growth of civilized life. Hither, in that year, came the Kaskaskia Indians, having moved down from their village on the Illinois River where Marquette, twenty-five years before, had set up among them the first outpost of Christian civilization in the Mississippi Valley. Hither also came the Tamarois, and with them the French from their village on the opposite side of the Mississippi. With the Kaskaskia was their pastor, Gabriel Marest of the Society of Jesus, and with the Tamarois was their pastor also, Francois Pinet, of the same Society, the latter having but recently closed his Miami mission, the earliest religious establishment ever set up within the limits of Chicago. Francois Pinet, Chicago's first resident priest, was likewise one of the group of Jesuit missionaries at the Des Peres settlement to whom belongs the distinction of having been the first resident priest on the site of St. Louis; so early a link of historical association do we discover between the metropolis of (42) Tin Kaskaskias on the River Des Peres 43 the Great Lakes region and the no less forward-looking metropolis of the Mississippi Valley. The little French-Indian community at the mouth of the Des Peres, hovers ghostlike for a brief spell over the threshold of Missouri history and then fades utterly from view into the surrounding gloom. Until yesterday, when it lifted its head clear of the mists of myth and legend and took rank as the first patch of civilized life ever laid out on Missouri soil, nothing of it more substantial had endured than a faint memory enshrined in the name of the stream, the Des Peres, or ' ' Fathers ' River, ' ' along the banks of which it one time nestled." 1 The account of the exodus of the Kaskaskia and of its final outcome rests upon a number of contemporary documents, chief among them Father James Gravier's letter on the Mission of the Immaculate Con- ception, 1694, and the same Father's Relation of his Voyage to the Lower Mississippi in 1700, and Father Marest's letters from the Kaskaskia Mission on the Mississippi. All this was well known since the publication of the Jesuit Relations. But it Avas supposed that the transfer from Kaskaskia the ancient, to Kaskaskia the new, was effected in rapid progression. Weighty proof is now at hand that the migration found an intermediate place of refuge and rest in the Mission of St. Francis Xavier on the west bank of the Mississippi River at the mouth of the once so beautiful stream even now called the River Des Peres. That there was such a village on the Missouri side is vouched for by Moses Austin, writing in 1796, who states on the authority of the most ancient of the inhabitants, that the first settlement of the country by the French was a place called La Riviere Des Peres, which is situated on the Spanish side of the Mississippi about six miles below where the town of St. Louis now stands." 2 This place was the intermediate temporary settlement of the Kaskaskia Indians on their migration for the mission of the Immaculate Conception on the Illinois River, to the later mission of the Immaculate Conception on the Mississippi and the Okaw Rivers in South Illinois. The possible causes of this flitting of an entire tribe to a new habitat were several, chief among them, however, we re- gard the following : The foundation of Biloxi by Iberville, on the lower Mississippi, had caused a serious commotion among the Indian Neo- phytes at Kaskaskia, or as Father Gravier styles them, ' ' the Illinois of the Straits, ' ' meaning by this term the people at the narrow outlet of Peoria Lake, as distinguished from the Illinois of the Mississippi river. The 1 Garraghan, Gilbert J., "Some High Lights in Missouri's History" in "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. 3, p. 235. 2 Moses Austin left a Memorandum of his Journey from Virginia to Louisiana, West of the Mississippi River, 1796-7, from which this statement is cited by Father Kenny. i 1 History of the Archdiocese of St. Loins Kaskaskias uimt determined to leave the Peorias and to sail away to the south and live under the walls of Iberville's strong and rich new sett lenient at the mouth of the Great River. Father Gravier tells us of the momentous event: "I arrived too late among the Illinois of the Strait, of whom Father Marest had charge, to prevent the migration of the village of the Kaskaskia, which has been too precipitately made, in conse- quence of uncertain news respecting the Mississippi settlement. I do not think that the Kaskaskias would have thus separated from the Peouaroua and from the other Illinois of the Strait, if I could have arrived sooner. I reached them at least soon enough to conciliate their minds to some extent, and to prevent the insult that the Peouaroos and the Mouingouana were resolved to offer the Kaskaskia and the French when they embarked. I addressed all the chiefs in full Council, and, as they continue to retain some respect and good will for me, they parted very peaceably. But I augur no good from this separation, which ' have always opposed, for I foresaw but too well the evil consquences that would result from it. And may God grant that the road from Chicagwa to the Strait be not closed, and that the entire Illinois Mission may not suffer greatly thereby." 3 As the missions on the Illinois were dependant on Quebec for their supplies, the road over Chicago to Michillimackinae had to be kept open. If the Illinois Indians were not strong enough to resist the inroads of the Iroquois and the Sioux, the road to Canada would no longer be open and the missions would be doomed. But the Kaskaskias were on their way to the South; all that Father Gravier 's persuasions could accomplish was to halt the voyage near the Tamarois' village, where Fathers Marest and Pinet were awaiting them. Rouensa, the great chief of the Kaskaskias, who was a faithful Catholic, was leading them on, but did not know where to lead them. It had dawned upon his mind that the voyage to the Lower Mississippi was simply impossible. But to stay with the Cahokias and Tamarois on their narrow strip of territory between the river and the bluffs seemed equally destructive. Beyond the river lay a boundless expanse of wood- land and prairie. Some of the Missouri tribes, as the Osages and Mis- souri, were friendly to them. Why not cross over and erect their cabins beyond ? And that was exactly what the Kaskaskia did, and what Father Pinet induced his Tamarois to do ; and what the French traders from Kaskaskia and from Cahokia did not fail to imitate. The proofs for this very interesting fact have only recently been dug from the dust of two centuries by the Jesuit Fathers Kenny and Garraghan of St. Louis University and others. We will here give the substance of the argument. The southern boundary of the city of St. Louis is formed by a little river flowing from the northwest into the Mississippi. It has always borne 'Jesuit Relations," vol. 65, p. 102 ss. The . Kaskaskias on the River Des Peres 45 the poetical name of the Riviere des Peres, or the River of the Fathers. No one seemed to know when and why it was so named. Yet, the very name seemed to imply a certain connection with the Jesuit Fathers, the earliest missionaries in the Valley of the Mississippi. By a happy chance a number of letters were discovered in far-away Canada, that gave the key to the mystery, as we have already intimated. The time was 1700 and the occasion was the settlement made on the place, by Kaskaskia and Tamarois Indians and a considerable number of French traders and hunters from Old Kaskaskia on the Illinois and from Cahokia at the head of the American Bottoms. Father St. Cosme, priest of the Foreign Missions had returned from Arkansas to Cahokia in March 1700. Here he found his brother in the Society, Father Bergier, and his cousin, the younger St. Cosme, 4 who was not in priest's orders. He set about building a chapel and a Mission- house. St. Cosme was greatly surprised at the Jesuit's claim to the mission among the Tamarois, and Father Bergier, who remained alone after Father St. Cosme 's second departure for the South, was still more embarrassed by the arrival of the whole tribe of the Kaskaskias, as we gather from the letters to Bishop Laval written in 1700. Father St Cosme wrote : ' ' We had the chapel completed and erected a fine cross. But I was very much surprised at Father Binneteau's arrival. He had left Peoria to come and settle this mission." 5 Father Bergier on his part, informed the Bishop of the conditions obtaining in the mission in a letter dated February 1700: "I related to your Highness our trip to the Illinois, from which place I wrote you all I had found out about the condition of the missions and that which concerns the government of your church. There remains but to inform you of the condition of the latter. I arrived there the 7th of this month with young Mr. de St. Cosme. I have counted there a hundred cabins in all, or thereabouts, of which nearly half are vacant, because the greater part of the Cahokias are still in winter quarters twenty or twenty-five leagues from here up the Mississippi. "The Village is composed of Tamarois, Cahokias, some Michigans and Peorias. There are also some Missouri cabins, and shortly, there are to come about thirty-five cabins of this last-named nation, who are winter-quartering some ten or fifteen leagues from here below the village on the river. We must not, however, count this nation as forming part of the village and of the Tamarois mission, because it remains there only a few months to make the Indian wheat, while awaiting a day to return to its village, which is more than a hundred leagues away, upon the shores of the Missouri river. This it has not dared to undertake for the last Shea, John G., "The Catholic Church in Colonial Days," p. 541. St. Cosme to Mgr. Laval, dated at Tamarois, March 1700. Hi History of iln Archdiocese of St. Louis few years for fear of being surprised and defeated on the way by some other hostile nation. "The Tamarois and the Cahokias are the only ones that really form part of this mission. The Tamarois have about thirty cabins, and the Cahokias have nearly twice that number. Although the Tamarois are at present less numerous than the Cahokias, the village is still called Tamarois gallicized 'Des Tamarois,' because the Tamarois have been the first and are still the oldest inhabitants and have first lit a fire here, to use the Indian expression. All the other nations who have joined them afterwards have not caused the name of the village to change, but have been under t lie name of Tamarois although they were not Tamarois." 6 In the following year, however, after the arrival of the Kaskaskia tribe with their missionary, Marest, Father Bergier wrote from Tamarois about a division of his people occasioned by the new exodus of the Kaskaskias to the little river on the west bank now called the Des Peres: He gives his information in brief, clear-cut numbered clauses, which we subjoin together with Father Kenny's running comment. 1. "The Kats (this is a common short form for Kaskaskia) to the extent of about thirty cabins, have established their new village two leagues below this on the other side of the Mississippi. They have built a fort there, and nearly all the French have hastened thither." 7 Two leagues below "Tamarois," and "on the other side of the .Mississippi" brings us into Missouri at the mouth of the Des Peres River. "They have built a fort there" and "nearly all the French have hastened thither", indicate a settlement of whites. A number of French- men left the confederated camp with the Kaskaskia ; we see these now augmented by the accession of Frenchmen who had been at Tamarois, so that it is safe to say, that the whites in Missouri in 1700 were the largest aggregation of Caucasians at any one spot on the entire Miss- issippi Valley. Monsignor Bergier continues : 2. "The chief of the Tamarois, followed by some cabins, joined the Kats, attracted by Rouensa, who promises them much, and makes them believe him saying that he is called by the great chief of the French, Mr. d 'Iberville, as Father Marest has told him." 8 3. "The remainder of the Tamarois, numbering about twenty cabins are shortly going to join their chief, already settled at the Kats. So there s Bergier to Bishop of Quebec, February, 1700. Archives of Laval University, Quebec, quoted by Fortier, E. J., in "Illinois State Historical Library," No. 13, p. 233 ss., and by Father Lawrence Kenny, S. J., in "St. Louis Catholic Historical Keview, " vol. I, p. 151, cf. also "Illinois Catholic Historical Review," vol. V, p. 149. i "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. I, p. 1")2. s "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. I, p. 153. The Kaskaskias on the River Des Peres 47 will remain here only the Cahokia numbering 60 or 70 cabins. They are cutting - stakes to build a fort." 9 ' ' Here Ave learn how it came about that the early Illinois settlement changed its name at this time from Tamarois to Cahokia. The Tamarois abandoned the site and the Cahokia made it their permanent home." 10 It was early in 1 700 that the Kaskaskia migration reached the Tamarois or Cahokia village. But it is not probable that it rested there very long, the inference, therefore, seems justified that the foundation of the new Kaskaskia village at the junction of the Riviere des Peres with the Father of Waters, as indicated by Father Bergier, took place before the end of 1700. The friendly cooperation between the Jesuit Pinet and the Semin- ary priest Bergier did not last long. In fact, Father Pinet was recalled by Father Marest to the place he termed "Among the Kaskaskias," which is, of course, the village of the Jesuit Fathers on the soil of Missouri. Father Marest, writes to Father Lamberville in Paris under date of July 5, 1702: "Father Pinet a very holy and zealous missionary, has left the station at the Tamarois, or Arkinsa, 11 in accordance with your directions to me. But he has only half quitted it, for he has left a man in our house there who takes care of it, and thus we occasionally go thither from this place to show that we are obedient to the king, pending the receipt of his orders. That Father now has charge of the Kaskaskias, where I leave him alone, to his great sorrow — owing to present circum- stances, wherein Monsieur Bergier shows that he is a worthy member of the Missions Etrangeres. Inform him of the ruling by which the Vicars-General have no right to visit our churches or to hear confessions in them without our consent. I am convinced that these missions will receive rude shocks. They were beginning to be on a good footing. This caused jealousy in the minds of the Gentlemen of the Foreign Missions, who have come to take them from us. God grant that they may leave them in a better condition than we have done." 12 Father Bergier at Cahokia had been appointed Vicar-General of the Bishop of Quebec in the Mississippi Valley ; and Father Gravier, the former Vicar-General, had referred the entire dispute concerning the Illinois Missions to the judgment of the King. As the Seminary priests were confirmed in their possession of the Mission at Cahokia, Father Pinet was recalled, and Father Bergier assumed control of the Indians and what was left of the French at Cahokia. This happened about the middle of June 1702. Personally, the two missionary bands were on friendly terms; yet the friction caused by the contested authority had a "St. Louis Catholic Historical Eeview, " vol. I, p. 153. i" Kenny, ibidem. n Arkinsa are the adopted tribe of the Metchigamias who had arrived from the Arkansas Kiver. 12 "Jesuit Eelations," vol. 66, p. 253. 48 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis not been without deleterious influence on the Indian population of the ( wo villages on opposite sides of the river. As Father Garraghan tells us in his recent article in the Sunday Globe-Democrat of St. Louis: "Rouensa, the Kaskaskia chief, offered every inducement to the Tamarois and Cahokia to move across the river to his new settlement. Presents were not wanting, 500 pounds of powder and "a cask when the French shall have come up from the sea." Father Bergier, to hold his Indians, had to lay before them counter attractions, "a kettle, four pounds of powder, a pound of colored glass beads, four boxes of vermilion and a dozen knives." Long Neck, the Tamarois chief, set before his people the charms of the Kaskaskia village, which had won for itself the allur- ing soubriquet of "The Land of Life." 13 "On the other hand, Chicagoua, another Tamarois chief, showed himself indifferent in the question of the hour and declared it was all one to him, whether his tribesmen went or stayed. In the end, only a third of the Tamarois, some twelve cabins, with their chief, presumably Long Neck, moved to the Des Peres. A much larger number had no doubt been expected, as one day in April 1701, Rouensa sent as many as twenty-three pirogues 14 to bring the Indians over from Cahokia. Whether the rest of the tribe eventually followed the third that migrated, cannot be ascertained. At all events, it is significant that a hitherto unpublished map in the National Library, Paris, indicates the Tamarois village as being, at this period, on the west side of the Mississippi below Cahokia." 15 Thus time ran on in the little village by the River des Peres. Father Bore came here as also Brother Guibert. The chapel was well attended by the neophytes. Trade with the tribes on the Missouri River was going on briskly. Yet, the feeling was abroad that the Des Peres settle- ment was not the final goal of the Kaskaskia migration. In his letter of July 5th, 1702 to Father Lamberville, Father Marest writes about Father Mermet's going to the new post on the Wabash prob- ably meaning the mouth of the Ohio, 16 which was often called the Wabash, and his own intention of visiting the Sioux country. He then adds the significant remark : "An effort should be made to give us accurate infor- mation about Monsieur de Ponchartrain's intentions — respecting what is 13 RochemonteiXj Camille de, "Les Jesuites et La Nouvellr Prance aus XVII Siecle," Paris, 1895. n A pirogue is ;i Log hollowed out by fire. is Father Garraghan of the St. Louis University, whilst in Paris, discovered a large number of 200-year old maps, for the most part sketches which the celebrated cartographer Guillaume de Lisle left at his death forty years before Laclede Liquest planned to build St. Louis. They are now available in photostatic copies in the Collection of the Missouri Historical Society. i« Probably on the site of Fori Massac. Thr Kaskaskias on the River Des Peres 40 asked and expected from our Savages, as well as the grant that the Court will be pleased to give them. I think you understand what I mean.'* 17 "Our Savages" are the Kaskaskias and Tamarois on the Riviere des Peres. Shall they remain there, or if not, where shall they go ? These were the questions that agitated the writer's mind. His correspondent certainly understood what he meant. At what time this removal to Kaskaskia on the Illinois side of the .Mississippi was effected, is not quite clear. The only clew we have is an entry in the Kaskaskia Baptismal Record: "1702, April 25. Ad ripani Metchegameam dictam venimus." 18 "In 1703, on April 2.3, we arrived on the banks of the river called the Metchigamia. " Xow it is plain that this in no wise refers to Lake Michigan, but to a river. The Mechigamias, one of the six tribes of the Illinois confederation, had returned to the American Bottom from Arkansas and had occupied the country along the Okaw River, which was afterward called the Kaskaskia River, but was known up to Boisbriant 's time as the Metchigamia River. It would therefore, appear that the last migration of the Kaskaskias took place early in 1703. Delisle's Map of 1703, 19 places Kaskaskia on- the north bank of the Riviere des Peres. It is called "the Old Village of the Kaskaskias". and its location is fixed on the Missouri side by an offical report on the Seigniory of the Tamarois Mission in 1735, as about opposite to the mouth of the river Dupont, which issued from the marshes of the American Bottom and comes with gentle flow into the Mississippi.*'-" After the departure of the Kaskaskia and allied Indians, the village continued a precarious existence as the haunt of trappers and traders and scattered tribesmen of various nations, at least until 1735 when the plan was entertained to rebuild Fort Chartres at "the old village of the Kaskaskias." 21 17 "Jesuit Relations, - ' vol. 66, p. 41. is Cf. Mason, E. G., "Kaskaskia and Its Parish Records," Chicago, 1881. p. 8. is This date would seem to imply that the new Kaskaskia in Southern Illinois was already founded in 1703. 2" "Explication du plan et establissement de la Scignorie de la Mission des Tamarois," April 12, 1735, Laval University M.S. 2i The "Explication" gives the reasons why the old village of the Kaskaskias is regarded as a very advantageous site for the stone fort which the Court orders built in the Illinois: "lime-stone, building stone, wood for construction, a river to harbor the boats, the view over the Mississippi about two leagues up and two leagues down, the rocky bluff which slopes very gently down to the Mississippi, a fine prairie adjoining said bluff, the Mississippi which would be under the protection of the fort. The Missouri too, which empties into the river five leagues from here on the west side of said river, and the Illinois River which mingles its waters therewith eleven leagues from here on the west, (east). All these considerations would seem to prove the necessity of building the fort in question (in this place) as is very much the talk 50 History of the Archdiocese of St. Loin* But what name did this historic village and the Mission hear? No doubt some of the voyageurs up and down the Mississippi called it the village of "the Fathers," as distinguished from Cahokia, the village of "the Gentlemen of the Seminary." Others called it Kaskaskia as the former home of the principal tribe; Others again called it by name of the great chief of the Kaskaskias, "the village of Rouensa, " as Father Bergier in his letter to Bishop Vallier seems to imply, and as Father Mermet plainly states, March 2nd, 1700. But there certainly was some sainted name attached to a Catholic village and Jesuit Mission; Father Mermet tells us what it was : speaking of the Tamarois braves who brought the wounded Father Gravier in a canoe from the Peoria village on the Illinois River to the village on the des Peres, he praises them say- ing : "They did not leave him until he reached us at Ruenza's village, which is called St. Francois de Xavier, as you are aware." 22 now. In case this be done, the Seignorie of Tamarois would soon be established from one end to the other. ' ' 22 "Jesuit Eelations, " vol. 6G, p. 57. Chapter 7 CAHOKIA AND THE SEMINARY PRIESTS It was at Chicago iu the Mission of the Guardian Angel, that we first met Father Francis Pinet, its founder. And it was Father St. Cosme who introduced us to hiin, October 21st, 1698. Father Binneteau had just arrived from the South to accompany Father Pinet to the Illinois country. Both were preparing for the journey. Their house stood on the bank of a small river, with Lake Michigan on one side, and a fine vast prairie on the other. The village of the savages contained over a hundred and fifty cabins, and a league up the river was another village almost as large. 1 The Indians were Miamis. Father St. Cosme tells us that Father Pinet usually resided there except in winter, when the savages were all away, and that he then went to the Illinois. This was as early as 1698. Two years later we find Father Pinet already established at Cahokia, with Father Bergier of the Seminary of Quebec, having formed a mission, consisting of the Tamarois, Cahokias and possibly the Metchigamia from Arkansas. The Mission bore the name of the Holy Family. From this it would follow that Cahokia was the first Catholic foundation on the Upper Mississippi. Its location near the mouths of two important rivers, the Missouri and the Illinois, made it, for a time, the center of trade in the Illinois country. Thus Cahokia may claim the honor of priority of settlement on the borders of the Great River, not only as an Indian Mission but as a Parish of Catholic Frenchmen. The French villages in Illinois resulted from the grand colonization plan of Lasalle. The earliest one, indeed, Kaskaskia, on the Illinois river, was nothing more than a primitive Indian village until the crown- ing of the Rock of the Illinois with Fort St. Louis. Next in the order of time was the village of the Peorias at the foot of Lake Peoria. Then came Cahokia founded some time before the close of the seventeenth century. As to the merits of the case between the Jesuit Fathers and the Gentlemen of the Seminary the advantage seems to be on the side of the former: yet the later grant, though based on a misunderstanding, speaks in favor of the latter. Cahokia, also called Tamarois, was the chief seat of the two Illinois tribes' whose names it bore. In December 1690, Bishop St. i ' ' Chicago and the Old Northwest ' ' by Miles Milton Quaif e, contains a thorough discussion of Father Pinet 's Mission of the Angel Guardian at Chicago, pp. 39-42. Cf. also Frank R. Grover's lecture on Father Pinet and his Mission. (51) UNIVERSITY Of ILLINOIS LIBRARY- 52 History of tin Archdiocese of St. Louis Vallier of Quebec had appointed Father Gravier, S. J., his Vicar General and entrusted the care of the Illinois mission and other surrounding nations to the Jesuits. "Some of the surrounding nations" are specifically mentioned: "the Miamis and the Sioux towards the west." The Cahokias and Tamarois, being of the Illinois nation, were within Father Gravier's jurisdiction. Father Gravier had visited Cahokia at least once; But no mission had so far been established there when the Seminary of Quebec asked and obtain- ed from Bishop Vallier, by letters patent, dated June 4, 1698, a grant of the Tamarois mission as a necessary key to the entire valley of the Mis- souri River. Without losing any time Father John Bergier, a priest of the Seminary of Quebec, started for Tamarois, on February 7, 1700, in order to establish the Mission of the Holy Family. About the same time the Jesuit Father Francis Pinet arrived and claimed the mission on the ground that the evangelization of all the Illinois tribes was committed to the Jesuits. Both priests remained at Tamarois, Father Berg- ier ministering to the French traders and Father Pinet to the Indians. Peace ruled in the village: but it was threatened from the North-west by the Sioux, and from the South-east by the Shawnees. On June 14, 1700, Father Bergier wrote: "We have frequent alarms here, and have several times been obliged to receive within our walls nearly all the women and children of the village. Pentecost Sunday there was an alarm, which was not without consequences. "Some Sioux war-party had murdered a number of men and women. Some Tamarois Indians and Frenchmen fought off the invaders and captured three Sioux. The prisoners were "Killed, burnt and eaten." 2 Father Pinet instructed one of the victims before death and baptized him. After the return of the Cahokias from their winter-quarters, the exodus of the Kaskaskia with a part of the Tamarois and the French t raders, to the newly-established village on the Missouri side took place. On June 4th 1701, an ecclesiastical commission appointed by the King, Louis XIV, decided that the Tamarois Mission belonged to the Seminary. Father Gravier gracefully accepted the decision and recalled Father Pinet to the new Kaskaskia village on the River des Peres where Father Marest had already gone. But when Father Bergier set up his claim that he had been appointed Vicar General in place of the Jesuit Superior, Father Gravier demurred. The two rival establishments on opposite banks of the Mississippi, however, maintained friendly relations, the members visiting one another as good neighbors. The only differences between them originated in the contested Vicar-General- ship. Monsignor Bergier remained in Cahokia as missionary and Vicar- General of Quebec until his death, in 1712. As such he administered the 2 Father Bergier's 3rd letter, dated June 14, 1700, in Fortier's "The Establish- ment of the Tamaroan Mission." Cahokia and the Seminary Priests 53 last sacraments to Father Francis Pinet, who died the death of a saint, August 1, 1702, and buried him in the little grave-yard on the Missouri side, although he had, in the excess of zeal for authority, interdicted the church on the Kiviere des Peres. Six years previous in 1706, Monsignor Bergier had visited Bien- ville in Mobile, 3 where a priest of the Foreign Mission, Father de la Vente, was pastor. In consequence of the Vicar-General's representations a larger residence was erected for the priests at the church adjoining Fort St. Louis in the Bay of Mobile. When at last the Kaskaskia Indians and their French followers were definitely settled in their new village at the mouth of the Okaw River in what is now Randolph County, Illinois, the friendly visits for spiritual converse and mutual help and consolation did not cease, although they became less frequent. On November 9, 1712, Father Marest writes of his last visit to Father Bergier at the Tamarois village. "Having learnt that the Monsignor was dangerously ill, I immediately went to assist him. I remained eight entire days with this worthy ecclesiastic. The care I took of him and the remedies which I gave him, seemed gradually to restore him, so that he urged me to return to my village. Before leaving him, I administered to him the Holy Viaticum. He instructed me as to the condition of his mission, recommending it to me in case that God should take him away. When I arrived at our village nearly all the savages had gone, (on their usual hunting excursion). They were scattered along the Mississippi. I immediately set out to join them." 4 Here the Missionary was kept very busy with sick-calls to the various encampments; yet the illness of Father Bergier continually disturbed his mind and urged him to return to Kaskaskia. But no news had come from Tamarois and, as "no news is good news," Father Marest 's anxiety was greatly relieved. A few days afterward however, a young slave came to apprize him of Father Bergier 's death and beg him to go to perform the funeral rites. Father Marest set out at once and, walking all night, arrived there towards evening the next day. In the morning he said Mass for the deceased and buried him in the churchyard of Cahokia. The death of Father Bergier was a most edifying one; he felt it coming all at once, and said that it would be useless to send for a priest from Kaskaskia, since he would be dead before his arrival. He merely took in his hands the crucifix which he kissed lovingly and expired." 5 Father Marest 3 Father de la Vente in his earlier days, one of the three important personages in Mobile, or in the language of Gayarre, "one of the hinges upon which everything turned in the commonwealth of Louisiana," "History of Louisiana, I, p. «7. Mobile was the seat of the Government before the foundation of New Orleans. 4 "Jesuit Kelations," vol. 66, p. 263. s "Jesuit Kelations," vol. 66, p. 263. .">4 History of the Archdiocese of St. Loins adds to his account of Father Bergier's death a gentle word of praise, calling him "a missionary of true merit and of a very austere life." After Father Bergier's death the mission and Parish of Cahokia remained in care of the Jesuits of Kaskaskia because the Seminary of Quebec had no one to send to this important station. On October 16, 1717, Father Dominic Mary Varlet received the appointment from the Bishop of Quebec as Vicar-General, especially for Fort le Mobile or Fort St. Louis, and the places and missions along the River Mississippi, with the jurisdiction over all priests, secular or regular, except priests of the Society of Jesus, who were subject to their own Superior. "The new Vicar-General represented to the Bishop that a considerable time might elapse before he could reach the Tamarois Mission, and that in the mean time the Seminary might be unable to send a successor to Rev. M. Bergier at that place, he therefore solicited a confirmation of the original Letters-Patent granted to the Seminary of Quebec for the Miss- issippi Mission and especially for that of the Tamarois. The Bishop accordingly renewed the letters of May 10 and July 14, 1698. Monsig- nor Varlet proceeded to occupy his new field of labor. He had served at Mobile as a missionary from 1713 to 1715 and from 1715 on, he signed himself as Vicar-General. The document of 1717, therefore, is but an extension of his powers after the death of Vicar-General Bergier. There is no proof to show that Father Varlet attended the Parish of Cahokia at any time, though he seems to have visited it. In 1718 Father Varlet was appointed Bishop of Ascalon and Coadjutor to the Bishop of Baby- lon and, after receiving episcopal consecration, set out for the East. Meanwhile evidence had reached Rome that Varlet was an active adherent to the doctrines of Jansenism. Bishop Varlet then retired to Utrecht in Holland where he helped to establish the Jansenist Church, consecrating four of its archbishops. He died in 1742. The socalled Old-Catholics derive their episcopate from this renegade Bishop. 6 After Monsignor's departure in 1719 the Seminary of the Foreign Missions sent Fathers Antoine Thaumer de la Source and Francois le Mercier to Cahokia. It was due to the influence exerted by these two missionaries, that Sieur des Crsins of the" Royal Company of the Indies," and Pierre Duguet de Boisbriant, the "First Lieutenant of the King in the Province of Louisiana", granted to the Missionaries of Cahokia and Tamarois, in Fee Simple "a tract of Four Leagues square with the neighboring island, 7 to be taken a quarter of a league above the small river of the Cahokias, situated above the Indian Village, and in going up 6 "Catholic Church in the Colonies," John G. Shea, p. 556. Both letters as signing the Tamarois Mission to the Seminary priests, "Illinois Catholic Historical Review," vol. V. As to Varlet, cf. "American Catholic Quarterly Review," vol. XIV, pp. 533 ss. 7 This Island is now called Arsenal Island. Cahokia and the Seminary Priests 55 following the course of the Mississippi, and in returning towards the Fort of Chartres, running in depth to the north, east and south for quantity.'" The French government on August 1743 confirmed this grant. But as early as June 22, 1722, the missionaries were authorized, "to work, clear, plant the land." Thus the Mission of Cahokia became a grand Seigniory stretching from the village to the confines of Fort Chartres. 9 Father Charlevoix on his tour of inspection from Canada to the Gulf arrived at Cahokia on the 10th day of October 1721, and left us an interesting account of the place and its priests : ' ' The same Day, October 19, we went to stay in a village of the Cahokias and Tamarois. These are two nations of the Illinois which are united, and who do not together make a very numerous village. It is situated on a little river 10 which comes from the east, and which has no water but in the Spring season, so that we were forced to walk a good half league to the cabins. I was surprised that they had chosen such an inconvenient situation, as they might have found a much better one ; but they told me that the Mississippi washed the foot of the village when it was built, and that in three years the river had lost half a league of ground, and that they were thinking of looking out for another settlement. I passed the night in the house of the missionaries, who are two ecclesiastics of the Semi- nary of Quebec, formerly my disciples, but who might now be my masters. The elder of the two, Dominic A. Thaumer was absent. I found the younger, Francois le Mercier such as he has been reported to me, severe to himself, full of charity for others and making virtue amiable in his own person. But he has so little health, that I think he cannot long support the way of life which they are obliged to lead in these missions." 11 The Gentlemen of the Seminary as well as the Jesuit Fathers had long cast wistful eyes upon the West, where the Missouri rolled its muddy waters through lands of many nations still sitting "in darkness and the shadow of death." But adventurous laymen showed the way to their goal. In March 1702, seventeen Frenchmen left Cahokia to ascend the Missouri river ; Derbanne followed about 1706 ; Darac was dispatched by Bienville to the Missouri in 1710 ; Nine years later 8 The "Illinois Catholic Historical Review" has two articles on the Catholic Mission Property by Joseph J. Thompson, vol. V, p. 195-217 and vol. VI, p. 99-135. The grant was made by Boisbriant, and des Ursins on June 22, 1722. At Father Mercier 's request, April 20, 1743, Vaudreuil promised to obtain the confirmation from Maurepas which was given on August 4, 1743. The further transaction in regard to the Cahokia Mission property was involved in darkness. What Vaudreuil himself con- firmed was the title to lands the Gentlemen of the Seminary had illegally bought from the Indians in order to divide them gratis among bona fide settlers, s Fort Chartres stood about ten miles north of Kaskaskia. io The Cahokia Creek. ii Wallace, Jos., "The History of Illinois and Louisiana," p. 209. 56 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis Dutisne, coming from the South, disembarked his force at the mouth of the Saline River, ten miles below what was destined to be Ste. Genevieve, and taking a uorth-wesl course reached the Indian villages 4 History of the Archdiocese of St. Loins and the Mississippi rivers, and al last, on September 10th, he arrived at his dear mission in perfect health, after an absence of five months. When Father Marest made known to his French and Indians, that he had promised to stay with the Peorias, they would not hear of it: Accordingly Father de Ville 10 was sent there in his place. Father Marest 11 remained with his dear Kaskaskias until his death, September 15th, 1716, one of the noblest and best of the old Jesuit Missionaries. As the editor of the Jesuit Relations says, "Gabriel Marest devoted himself to the civilization as well as the religious instruction of the Kaskaskia ; he taught them to cultivate the soil and raise domestic animals, and rendered them the most industrious and peaceable of the western savages." 12 10 Father de Ville's baptismal names are given as Jean Marie and by others as Louis. He belonged to the Province of Champagne, was born at Auxerre, September 8, 1672. He arrived in Canada in 1706, and died at Natchez, June 15, 1720. ii Father Marest was baptized Pierre Gabriel. He was born at Laval, Maync. October 14, 1662, entered the Order in Paris, October 1, 1681, arrived in Canada in 1694, and died at Kaskaskia, February 15, 1714. His remains were interred in the stone church at Kaskaskia by Father Boullenger. The "Jesuit Relations" contain a very interesting letter in beautiful Latin about his experiences on the voyage of Bienville to Hudson 's Bay. 12 "Jesuit Relations, " vol. 65, p. 265. I OLD CHURCH BELL OF KASKASKIA Chapter 9 KASKASKIA AND ITS DEPENDENCIES I. In Southern Illinois, near the Mississippi, one hundred miles or more above the mouth of the Ohio, is situated the ancient village of Kaskaskia, supposed to be the oldest permanent European settlement in the valley of the Father of Waters." 1 Thus Edward G. Mason, in December 1879, alluded to the principal seat of the Church in the terri- tory of our future diocese of St. Louis during the greater part of the eighteenth century. That the honor of being the first-born must be ceded to Cahokia. we have seen : but the village or town of old Kaskaskia itself is now no more, the yellow waters of' the Mississippi, uniting with those of the Okaw or Kaskaskia Kiver, swept away the site and the houses and all that was once the pride of the Mississippi Valley. The first of the old village to go was the northern part. Then the houses that had been the eastern outskirts of the village began to slip into the water at flood time and disappear toward the Gulf. In the nineties of the last century the river was running over the very ground that had once been a part of the city. The current was marching farther and farther south, and all that was left was a part of the old graveyard and half a dozen deserted cabins, with chimneys falling down, roofs gone and the very timbers slowly wearing away through the action of the sun, the rain and the wind. Three thousand bodies were carried out of the old cemetery in 1892 and 1893. They are now buried near the ruins of old Fort Gage. A monument was erected there with this inscription : "Those who sleep here were the first buried at Kaskaskia and after- wards removed to this cemetery. They were the early pioneers of the Mississippi Valley." But we are here concerned, not with the ruined present, but with the honorable past. Kaskaskia as a mission dates back to the period between 1703 and 1705. Let us follow the current of events. It was about 1703 that the removal of the Kaskaskia and their friends and followers from the River des Peres on the Missouri side, to the Okaw river on the Illinois side was carried out under the direction of Father Marest. "Illinois in the 18th Century," p. 1. (65) Vol. 1—3 <>G History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis After the cabins of the Indians, and the more comfortable homes of the French were established, and the church and mission house of the Immaculate Conception had risen in the center of the straggling village, the work of organizing the new community proceeded. As a matter of course the missionary Fathers ruled the entire establishment of the French as well as Indians. For the Jesuits not only attended to the spiritual needs of their people, but also dispensed justice to them, and as Blanchard says, "their authority was never abused but always used with paternal care." Concerning Father Marest and his successor, Mermet, we have ample proof of this in their letters and those of their contemporaries : but it is the same with all of them. As Judge Sidney Breese clearly states the case; "No evidence is to be found, among our early records, of the exercise of any controlling power, save the Jesuits, up to the time of the grant to Crozat in 1712, and I have no idea that any such existed in the shape of government, or that there was any other social organization than that effected by them and of which they were the head. ' ' 2 Indeed, a blessed country, having no courts, no lawyers, no prisons, no taxes, but only the gentle sway of a loving Father. For nearly twenty years this new Kaskaskia, afterwards called the Ancient, lived a secluded, serene and contented life; only at long intervals some canoe party would arrive from Canada, bringing voyageurs and coureurs de bois and a new stock of goods to the expectant inhabitants, or a boat of two from the upper reaches of the Mississippi or Missouri with the wealth of a season of trapping and, hunting and trading. "In 1704 we find it represented that more than a hundred Canadians were scattered in small parties along the Mississippi and Missouri." 3 They were hardy and brave men, these Canadians and French from France, well-fitted for the work of blazing the pathway of civilization through the primeval wilderness of forest and prairie and mountain pass. Many of the Frenchmen intermarried with the Indians of the village and founded the families that even iioav bear the traits of their Indian ancestry. But white girls of marriageable age were sent over by order of the king under the guardianship of IJrsulines and other nuns, to be given in marriage to worthy Frenchmen of Louisiana and the Illinois country. Kaskaskia, no doubt, received its fair proportion of these godsends. Others were brought down from Canada by their hus- bands to become the mothers of ever multiplying families. Good wives and mothers they mostly were. In religion all professed the Catholic Faith. They knew'no difference of sects, and although, perchance, not 2 Breese, Sidney, "Early History of Illinois," p. 146. s Parkman, "Conflict of Half a Century," vol. I, p. 3f>4., citing letter of Bienville to the Minister, September 6, 1704. Kaskaskia and its Dependencies 67 as well instructed as their sisters in France, the teachings of the Church and, still more, the immemorial practice of piety, had a strong hold on their lives. As Monette says: "Ardently attached, as they were, to their spiritual guides, religion became one of the great rules of social life. They observed strictly all the outward rites and ceremonies of the Romish church, and their lives corresponded with their professions. Ig- norant of creeds, except the "Apostles' Creed," they were not skillful disputants; but holydays and festivals Avere never forgotten or neg- lected." 4 The Indian neophytes of Kaskaskia were now making speedy prog- ress in religion and the arts of peace. Under the prudent direction of the Fathers Marest and Mermet they turned with real interest to agri- culture and cattle-raising. They also became more and more devoted to prayer and the practice of religion. America's greatest historian, Ban- croft, in his beautiful tribute of praise to Father James Mermet em- bodies some of the characteristic features of Indian life in Kaskaskia mission at this period : "The gentle virtues and fervid eloquence of Mermet made him the soul of the mission at Kaskaskia. At early dawn his pupils came to church, dressed neatly and modestly, each in a deer-skin or robe sewed together from several skins. After receiving lessons, they chanted can- ticles; mass was then said in presence of all the Christians, the French and the converts — the Avomen on one side and the men on the other. From prayers and instructions the missionaries proceeded to visit the sick and minister medicine, and their skill as physicians did more than all the rest to win confidence. In the afternoon the catechism was tauglit in the presence of the young and old, when everyone, without distinc- tion of rank or age, ansAvered the questions of the missionary. At eve- ning all would assemble at the chapel for instruction, for prayer, and to chant the hymns of the church. On Sundays and festivals, even after vespers a homily AA'as pronounced ; at the close of the day parties would meet in houses to recite the chaplets in alternate choirs and sing psalms till late at night. Saturday and Sunday Avere the days appointed for confession and communion, and eA r ery convert confessed once in a fort- night . . the success of this mission was such that marriages of the 4 Monette, John W., "History of the Discovery and Settlement of the Valley of the Mississippi, 1846," vol. I, p. 187. One of the best standard works on the history of the Mississippi "Valley, extending in time from the first Spanish discoveries in Florida to the admission of Texas into the union. It includes a relation of the French and Spanish discovery of the territory, and the association of the colonial government of these nations with the Indians, and their wars with the various tribes inhabiting it, also a narration of the Indian Wars of the states bordering the Ohio, etc. 68 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis French immigrants were sometimes solemnized with the daughters of the Illinois according to the rites of the Catholic Church." 5 When the eminent scholar and historian, Charlevoix, 6 arrived at the prosperous village of Kaskaskia, Oct. 12, 1721, he found there and in the immediate neighborhood four Jesuit Fathers: Joseph Francis Kereben 7 John Anthony Boullenger, Nicholas [gnatius de Beaubois 8 and John Charles Guymeneau. 9 The gentle Father Maresl was dead, and his former assistant Father Mermet 10 had followed his guide and friend on September 15, 1716. The Superior of the Community was Father Guy- meneau with his residence in the smaller Indian Mission two leagues distant IV Kaskaskia in the interior of the country. The larger Indian mission presided over by Fathers le Boullenger and de Kereben lay on the bank of the Mississippi half a league above Fort Chartres where the Lieutenant of the King, M. de Boisbriant held forth in almost royal state. There was a chapel just outside the walls of the Fort dedicated to St. Anne, but it had no regular chaplain at the time. The Inter- mediate space between the Fort and what Charlevoix called "the most numerous mission" was beginning to be filled with French colonists. Two leagues farther down from Fort Chartres and about one league 5 Bancroft, George, "History of the United States," 1854, vol, III, p. 198. 6 Charlevoix, Father Pierre Francois Xavier, de; a member of the Jesuit Province of France, was born at Saint Quentin, October 29, 1682, and arrived in Canada in 1705, before his ordination, returned to France for ordination, and died at La Fleehe, February 1, 171G. He traveled through Canada and Louisiana, 1720-22, and laid down his impressions in his "Letters to Duchess of Lesdiguieres; Voyage to Canada and Travels through that Vast Country and Louisiana, to the Gulf of Mexico." Much valuable information regarding Indian tribes and settlements of Lower Mississippi Valley, including character of every nation or tribe, customs, posts, forts and settlements established by the French, rivers, mines, fisheries. 7 Father Joseph Francis Kereben of the Province of France, was born Decem- ber 29, 1683, arrived in Canada in 1716, and was sent to the Illinois Mission, where lie labored until his death, February 2, 1728. 8 Father Nicholas Ignatius Beaubois was born at Orleans, October 15, 1689, and entered the Society with seventeen years. He was Pastor of the Parish Church of the Immaculate Conception at Kaskaskia from 1719 to 1724, and was the ap- pointed Vicar-General for the Bishop of Quebec for Louisiana. 9 Father John Charles Guymoneau, at this time Vicar-General of the Bishop of Quebec, for the Illinois Country, was born March 14, 1684, and entered the Society of Jesus, October 3, 1704. He arrived in Canada in 1715. The "St. Joseph Baptis- mal Register" shews his presence at the Miami Mission on St. Joseph River in 1722 and 1723. As Father Charlevoix's visit fell in October 1721, Father Guymoneau must have left his place at the Illinois Mission for the Miami Mission on the River St. Joseph. 10 The remains of both Fathers Marest and Mermet were removed to the stone church of Kaskaskia by Father Boullenger in 1727. Kashas/,- ia and its Dependencies 69 from the river was the French village of Kaskaskia, almost all its, in- habitants being Canadians. Father Beanbois was the Parish Priest. Kaskaskia was then and remained for a long time afterwards, the most important settlement in the country of the Illinois. The principal buildings, as the church, the Jesuits home with a small chapel attached, and a number of dwellings were built of stone and made a fine appear- ance,. The "Jesuits Plantation," as Pittmann tells us, "consisted of two hundred and forty arpents of cultivated land, a very good stock of cattle and a brewery." 11 "The French of Kaskaskia," Charlevoix found on his visit, "are pretty much at their ease. A Fleming, who was a servant of the Jesuits, has taught them how to sow wheat, and it thrives very well. They have some horned cattle. The Illinois Indians cultivate the lands after their fashion and are very industrious. Their women are sufficiently dexter- ous; they spin the buffalo's wool and make it as fine as that of the English sheep. Sometimes one would even take it for silk. They make stuffs of it, which they dye black, yellow and dark red ; they make gowns of it, which they sew with thread made of the sinews of the roebuck. They expose these to the sun for three days, and when dry, beat them, and draw out threads of great fineness. ' ' All the country is open. It consists of vast prairies, which extend for twenty-five leagues, and are separated by little groves that are all of good wood." 12 "Father Charlevoix was so well pleased with what he saw and heard at Kaskaskia, that he prolonged his stay for a month. He reach- ed the mouth of the Ohio about the 15th of November 1721." Kaskaskia, the Illinois Mission, became within twenty years after its foundation the center of a cluster of villages each one a new center of Catholic life. Fort Chartres, with its chapel dedicated to St. Anne, gathered around its walls a large population, and became the historic Parish of St. Anne of Fort Chartres. Prairie du Rocher had its begin- ning in 1734 when St. Joseph's Mortuary Chapel was erected near the bluffs, to be used as a chapel of ease by the people of Fort Chartres. The village and Church of St. Philippe a short distance northeast of Fort Chartres was founded about 1723 by Philip Francis Renault, the Director General of the mining operations of the "Royal Company ii Pittman, Captain Philip, " The Present State of the European Settlements on the Mississippi," p. 85. The book was originally published in London, 1770. Pitt- man ' ' saw the Illinois villages just before they were deserted by the French and before the coming of the Americans. ' ' 12 Charlevoix, English Translation, p. 303. Cf. Wallace, "History of Illinois and Louisiana Under the French Eule, " p. 210. 70 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis of the Indies." A very good highway connected these settlements with Cahokia, forming an almost continuous stretch of human habitations along the Mississippi, where, at the opening of the century, nothing but primeval forest stood in its wild loneliness and grandeur. Fort Chartres was built in 1720 by Pierre Dugue Sieur de Boisbri- ant. Royal Commandant in Illinois. It was erected at the expense of the company of the Indies, at a spot about sixteen miles N. W. of Kas- kaskia, and a mile from the .Mississippi. The fort was at first built of wood; but it was rebuilt in heavy stone masonry (1753-1756), by the Chevalier MaCarthy according to the plans of M. Saucier 13 at a cost of over 5,000,000 livres; it was thenceforth, with.the village which had grown up around, called New Chartres. The Fort was occupied by the Illinois Commandant, and later, by a British garrison. The Church of St. Anne was attended by the .Jesuit Fathers of Kaskaskia. In the Register of Baptisms the first entry is that of Nich- olas Ignatius Beaubois, who was the superior of the Jesuits in the Illi- nois. In 1725 and 1726 we find the name of Father Le Boullenger. From 1726 to 1843 there occurs a gap in the records. After that the Seminary Priests of Cahokia, Joseph Gagnon and Nicholas Laurent, who styles him- self "Missionarius Apostolicus, " performed priestly functions at St. Anne's until 1749, when St. Anne's seems to have fallen under an inter- dict, probably on account of intrusions by priests of the Foreign .Mis- sion into the Territory of the Jesuits. Further particulars are not obtainable. From 1757 to 1759 Forget Duverger, Vicar General for the Bishop of Quebec and Missionary Apostolic, signs his name as "Cure of St. Anne's." During this period the names of Recollet Hyppolyte Collet, the Jesuits Hubert and Aubert, occur in regular succession, then Collet once more, until in 1764 and 1765 the name of the Recollet Luke Collet occurs regularly until his death, September 10, 1765. The Fort and Village of New Chartres was surrendered by its Commandant, St. Ange the Bellerive to the English under Captain Sterling, October 10, 1765. The last parish priests of St. Anne's of Fort Chartres, the Recollet Father Luke Collet, had a very checkered career. His baptismal name was Leonard Philibert. He was born No- vember 3, 1715, and was ordained in Quebec, Feb. 24, 1752. In 1755 he was chaplain of the Fort at Presqu' Isle (Erie) and at the River aux Boeufs. In 1759 he acted at chaplain in the French army, was, made prisoner by the English, and was brought over to England. In 1760 he regained his freedom and passed over to France. On his return to 13 Cf. "Captain John B. Saucier at Fort Chartres, 111., 1751-1763" by John F. Snyder. Also, "Destruction of Kaskaskia by the Mississippi River," by J. B. Burkham, both published in the "Transactions of the Illinois State Historical So- ciety. ' ' Kaskaskia and its Dependencies 71 America he went to labor among the Illinois Indians. We learn from a letter of Father Meurin, a Jesuit, addressed to the Bishop of Quebec, and dated June 11, 1753 from Kaskaskia, Illinois, that Father Luke, the Recollet, had been buried in the Cemetery of St. Anne, at Fort Chartres. This Mission having been destroyed during the invasion of the Missis- sippi Valley, Father Meurin had his body taken up and carried to Prairie du Rocher. There it is that this dauntless missionary slumbers in peace, and most probably, in the church of that place." 14 When the Mission of St. Anne Avas destroyed, a part of the inhabitants with- drew to Prairie du Rocher, and the rest to the new parish of St. Louis, in Missouri. The vestments and sacred vessels were likewise carried to the chapel of Prairie du Rocher. Father Luke Collet was a brother of Rev. Charles Angelus Collet, Canon of the Quebec Cathedral. It was this Father Collet that officiated at the funeral ceremonies of the Marquis de Montcalm, in the Ursuline Church in Quebec. The two Collet brothers could not conceal their regret at seeing Canada pass under the sway of the English; they were, on that account, suspected by the British authorities, and obliged to quit the country. It seems however, that after the peace of 1763, the Collet brothers were at liberty to return to Canada. It is thought that they were natives of that country." 15 The mortuary chapel at Prairie du Rocher built near the cemetery in 1734 with St. Joseph as its patron, soon attracted a number of French families from the banks of the Mississippi to the higher and more salu- brious location at the foot of the bluffs. The massive walls of Fort Chartres were gradually falling a prey to the continuous attacks on their foundations by the waters of the Mississippi River, and the church of St. Anne had to be abandoned about 1788. It was then that St. Joseph's of Prairie du Rocher became the parish church of the district. As to the priests who held services in the Church of St. Joseph, it is plain that they cannot be designated as pastors, Prairie du Rocher it- self being but a chapel of ease and no parish church. But the records show a regular succession of well-known names. Beginning, with 1721 and reaching unto 1743 the names of the Jesuits J. L. Boullenger and N. I. De Beaubois appear on the fragmentary records. From 1743 to 1758 the Seminary priests Joseph Gagnon and Nicholas Laurens are very much in evidence. Father Gagnon kept all his registers in one book, but on June 30, 1757 the Rev. Forget Duverger, Cure de St. Anne, opens separate books for Baptisms, Marriages and Interments. Father Forget Duverger 's name appears here for the last time on June 15, 1759. i* Chronicle of the Canadian Clergy, and Archives of the Archbishop of Quebec. 15 Ibidem. 72 History of 1 1" Archdiocese of St. Louis The Recollets Hyppolyte and Luke Collel now enter upon the scene to be succeeded by the last of the old Jesuits in the Valley, Sebastian Louis Meurin. It is evident from this that St. Anne's of New Chartres and St. Joseph's of Prairie du Rocher were but one parish attended by the same priests, suffering the same changes of fortune and only changing its center of gravity from the river to the bluffs. Chapter 10 KASKASKIA AND ITS DEPENDENCIES. II. The colony of Louisiana was indeed a proud possession of the crown !' Prance ; yet, strange to say, its government required a large subsidy very year. Iberville and his brother Bienville certainly did not meet expectations as financiers. Their constant appeals for help at last dis- gusted the Grande Monarque, who had so many other causes and per- sons to support. He determined to give away, free of charge ; for better for worse ; for richer, for poorer, the entire realm of Louisiana with all its lands and rivers and posts, with all its mines and forests and prairies, with all its inhabitants, white and copper-colored. Only the sovereignty was to remain with the king. A gentleman of Paris, Sieur Anthony Crozat, a merchant prince of the Venetian type, was singled out for the magnificient gift. The Letters-Patent granted by Louis XIV to Crozat in September of 1/12 were of the widest character. This grant was, it may be said, the first attempt to develop the great central region of the United States. Crozat 's ships only could trade with all "Louisi- ana." which is described as "Bounded by New Mexico and by the Lands of the English of Carolina .... The River St. Louis, heretofore called the Mississippi, from the edge of the Sea as far as the Illinois; together with the River of St. Philip, heretofore called the Missourys. and of St. Jerome, heretofore called Ouabache (Wabash), with all the Countries, Territories, Lakes, within land, and the Rivers which fall directly or indirectly into that part of the River of St. Louis." 1 The gift was made for fifteen successive years, and included the absolute and exclusive right to open mines and search for precious stones, and to trade in all commodities with the French and the savages and also to lay out and cultivate plantations. ' ' If he should find it proper to have blacks in the said country of Louisiana," says one article of the contract between King Louis XIV and Sieur Crozat, "he may send a ship every year to trade for them directly upon the coast of Guinea, and he may sell those blacks to the inhabitants of the colony of Louisi- i Crozat 's Charter is given in Wallace "Illinois and Louisiana, ' ' pp. 233 to 238. Extracts are given in Martin's "History of Louisiana," C. VIII. 2 Article XIV of Crozat's Charter, Wallace, \>. 237. (73) 74 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis The Sieur Anthony Cro/;il was very proud of his new honors, hut also very hopeful of emoluments from his vast possessions. Yet finding after a brief space of time, that the increase of his honors was in inverse proportion to the results of his venture, he returned the Danaan gift to the King. Crozat resigned his charter in 1717 : it was then granted by the Regent, the Duke of Orleans, to the manipulator of finances, John Law, for the "Company of the West." The celebrated ventures of this com- pany and its head led to the bursting of the Mississippi Bubble. That is the gorgeous rise and fall of the new coloni ation efforts in Louisiana. The following year brought eight hundred immigrants to Dauphine Is- land, the nucleus of the future city of New Orleans. Shiploads after shiploads of human freight for the colonization of the Mississippi Valley arrived. Many of the poor engages perished of sickness, exposure and want. Law himself established a seigniory on a vast prairie on the Arkansas River and sent there thousands of Cath- olic Palatines. But in 1720 the downfall of Law led to the discovery that the Mississippi Company was bankrupt, and a new organization, the ' ' Royal Company of the Indies, ' ' was effected and took over the assets and liabilities of the "Company of the West." The large accessions of French and German colonists brought on a few changes in Kaskaskia's peaceful life. In 1720 the congregation of the French Catholics was raised to the dignity of a canonical parish, with all the rights and duties implied in the title. In 1721 a college was founded in the parish which continued to flourish until 1765. There were 400 French and 2.")0 negroes under Father Watrin's pastoral charge. The city itself was fairry prosperous, and the people, as a consequence, more pleasure-loving than before. In 1749 there were five Jesuit Fathers at the residence of Kaskaskia. Father Alexander Xavier de Guiyenne was Superior, his assistants were the Fathers Joseph Julius Fourre, Louis Vivier, Philibert Watrin, Sebastin Meurin and Brother Charles Magendi. The purpose of converting the Indians to the Faith was never absent from the minds of the French. In the Letters-Patent, issued to the "Company of the West" the fifty-third clause reads as follows: "As we regard especially the glory of God by procuring the salavation of the inhabitants, Indians and Negroes, whom we desire to be instructed in the true religion, the said Company shall be obliged to build at its own expense churches at the places Avhere it forms settlements, and also maintain a necessary number of ecclesiastics, either with the rank of parish priests, or such others, as shall be suitable, in order to preach the Gospel there, perform the Divine Service and administer the sacra- ments, all under the authority of the Bishop of Quebec, and said colony Kaskaskia and ils Dependencies 75 remaining in his Diocese as heretofore, and the parish-priests and other ecclesiastics which the Company shall maintain there, shall be at his nomination and patronage." 3 "By ordinance issued May 16th, 1722, by the commissioners of the Council, with the consent of the Bishop of Quebec, the Province of Louisi- ana was divided into three spiritual jurisdictions, the first comprised the banks of the Mississppi from the Gulf to the mouth of the Ohio, and included the region to the West between these latitudes. The Capu- chins were to officiate in the churches and missions of this district. and their Superior was to reside in New Orleans. The second district comprised all the territory north of the Ohio, and was assigned to the charge of the Jesuits, whose headquarters were to be in the Illinois. The districts w<>st of the Ohio and east of the Mississippi was assigned to the Carmelites. The residence of their Superior was ordinarily to be at Mobile. Each of the three Superiors was to be a Grand Vicar of the liishop of Quebec. By ordinance of the Bishop of Quebec, issued Dec 19th, 1722, the district of the Carmelites was added to that of the Capuchins. The Carmelites then returned to France. In December 1723, the northern boundary of this district was changed to Natchez, and all the country north of that point, to the east, and to the west, was put under the Jesuits. ' ' 4 The spiritual administration of the Illinois country as well as of Lower Louisiana and Canada was still with the Bishop of Quebec. He was, however, represented by Grand Vicars in the various parts of his Diocese. The only change was that the Superior of the Jesuits came to reside in New Orleans. Consequently we find Father Kerreben in that city from 1723 to 1725 and Father Beaubois from 1725 to 1728. "The Sieur de Boisbriant made numerous grants of land in the Illinois country by virtue of Letters-Patent issued by the Company of the "West and its successor the Royal Company of the Indies. Then each of the villages within his jurisdiction obtained large parcels of land in their immediate vicinity, which were to serve as Common-field for the inhabitants. Kaskaskia, Nouvelle Chartres, Prairie du Bocher, Prairie du Pont, each had its Commons, granted to them by the Company of the Indies. Land was plentiful, and the settlers were clamorous. But the defense of the settlements against hostile Indians was costly, whilst the trade became more and more unprofitable. The Company, therefore solicited leave to surrender the Mississippi Wilderness. On the 10th of April 1732, the jurisdiction and control over its commerce reverted Shea, "The Catholic Church in Colonial Days," pp. 562 and 563. "Narrative and Critical History of America," (Justin Winsor), vol. V, p. 43. 76 History of tht Archdiocese of St. Louis to the Crown of France." Bienville, once more took charge of the reins of government in New Orleans in 1735. In 1732 there arrived in the Illinois, accompanied by a numerous company of miners and San Domingo slaves, Philip Francois de Renault, newly-appointed Director General of the Mines of the Royal India Company in Illinois. There were five hundred negro slaves that came with Renault, the first contingent of the black invasion of Missouri and Illi- nois. He proceeded to Kaskaskia and in 1720 he built the village called St. Philip. He led his prospectors and miners, white, and black across t lie river to the district of Ste. Genevieve where they discovered a number of lead-mines that had been worked superficially by the Indians and visited by La Mothe Cadillac. The large influx of people of all classes and conditions of life that set in with the immigration propaganda conducted by Law and his as- sociates, though in the main beneficial to the colony itself, proved to be a serious detriment to religion and public morals. One of the last acts of the Bishop Saint Vallier of Quebec was a serious warning to the people of the Mississippi Valley in regard to the disregard of religion and purity in which the French recently arrived from France live in the vast country which they have come to inhabit along that great River. He then orders all those who under his authority have the conduct of souls to inveigh against those Avho were giving public scandal by im- piety in words or by their actions and by public concubinage. These public sinners should not be admitted to the church or to the sacraments, but should be subjected to public penance. The Circular Letter is dated July 19, 1721. 5 The introduction of Negro and Indian slavery into Louisiana by the French government also had an evil influence on the moral tone of the community and tended to involve the Illinois country where peace had ever reigned, in the Indian wars. Sometime in the summer of 1720 Boisbriant removed to Fort Chartres, and Kaskaskia ceased to be the seat of government. In 1725 he became Acting Governor and went to New Orleans. In 1730 St. Ange de Bellerive was Commandant and Major Pierre D Artaguiette, his lieutenant in the Illinois country. One cold clay in January 1736 the news came from New Orleans that a great campaign was to be commenced against the Chicasaws, who had com- mitted many a brutal deed against the colonists on the river. At the call to arms the Sieur de Vinsennes with his French militia and a troop of Miami Indians came to join D 'Artaguiette. The Cahokias and Miteh- igameas too were summoned. The Kaskaskias were dancing the war- dance in their villages making ready for the fray. The trappers and hunters from the Missouri took gun and powder-bag and knife and 5 Cf. Shea; "The Catholic Church in Colonial Days," p. 560 s. Kaskaskia and its Dependencies 77 hastened to the rendezvous at Fort Chartres. At last the preparations are completed and the expedition is to start. It is late in February 1736. Mass was said, and the people, old and young, hurried to the river to see the little army take to the boats. D 'Artaguiette and the Jesuit Father Senat led the way, as the flotilla departed amid the cheers of the bystanders. A few weeks later the Cahokias under the command of Moncheval passed the village on the same errand. There followed long days of anxious waiting for news from the distant field of action. It was a Sunday in June, the morning services at the church were just finished, when a messenger ran up to announce the disaster that had overtaken the combined forces of DArtaguette and Vincennes. They had waited for Bienville and Moncheval, but they did not come. And so, the brave men from Kaskaskia and the Wabash marched to the at- tack. The Chicasaws were awaiting them at their town. The French fought bravely but the Miamis betrayed them and the Illinois and Mis- souris ran away. D 'Artaguiette received a deadly wound just as victory seemed to be assured. The Sieur de Vincennes and Father Senat would not forsake their wounded friends. They were taken prisoners by the Chicasaws, together with fifteen others. Of their heroic end Monette writes this beautiful account : "D 'Artaguiette and his valiant companions who fell into the hands of the Chicasaws were treated with great kindness and attention ; their wounds dressed by the Indians, who watched over them with fraternal tenderness, and they were received into the cabins of the victors in hopes of a great ransom from Bienville, who was known to be advancing by way of the Tombigby with a powerful army. But the same day brought the intelligence of the advance and the discomfiture of the com- mander-in-chief St. Ange de Bellerive. His retreat and final departure soon followed and the Chicasaws, elated with their success, and despair- ing of the expected ransom, resolved to sacrifice the victims to savage triumph and revenge. The prisoners were taken to a neighboring field, and while one was left to relate their fate to their countrymen, the young and intrepid D 'Artaguiette, and the heroic Vincennes, whose name is borne by the oldest town in Indiana, and will be perpetuated as long as the Wabash shall flow by the dwellings of civilized men, and the faith- ful Senat, true to his mission, were, with their companions, each tied to a stake. Here they were tortured before slow 7 and intermitting fires, until death mercifully released them from their protracted torments." All honor to the Jesuit Senat who might have fled, but remained to receive the last sigh of the wounded, regardless of danger, and mindful only of duty. 6 Monette, "Valley of the Mississippi," vol. I, p. 288. Also, Martin's Louisiana, p. 304. 78 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis But like honor also to the heroic priests who remained at home to guide and comfort the souls entrusted to their care, the Jesuit Fathers D'Outreleau and his companions, Boullenger and Guymeneau, the Super- ior who was sick unto death in the days of anxious waiting. They too, no doubt, would have been equal to the heroic duty fulfilled by Father Antoine Senat, if they had received the call. For was not their whole life a continual martyrdom for the cause of Christ? If it be true, that "they also serve, who only stand and wait," it must be true in the highesl sense that these Jesuits, who whilst waiting for a call to martyrdom, did not only stand ready, but went about, like their Lord and Leader, doing good. From 1735 to 1741 Father Etienne D'Outreleau signs himself as Pastor of the Immaculate Conception. His successor is Father Rene Tartarin from 1741 to 1747, to be followed by Philibert F. Watrin 1759. In this year Father Watrin becomes Superior of the Mission and remains in office until 1762. Father Jean B. Aubert is given as pastor of the Immaculate Conception from 1759 to 1764. Father Meurin is in charge of the Indians until 1764. Father Louis Vivier wrote two very interest- ing letters from among the Illinois, the one dated June 8, 1750 and the other November 17, 1750. A few extracts will no doubt, be accept- able. "When the first missionaries came among the Illinois" he writes, "they counted five thousand persons of all ages in that Nation. Today we count but two thousand." 7 In regard to the Illinois country, he tells us, "There are 5 French villages and 3 villages of Savages within a distance of 21 leagues, be- tween the Mississippi and the river called the Kaskaskias. In the five French villages there may be eleven hundred white people, three hundred black, and about sixty red slaves, otherwise savages. The three Illinois villages do not contain more than eight-hundred Savages, of all ages." 8 But Father Vivier 's thoughts are not confined to his own nation of the Illinois. There are many Indians towards the West who are also called to be God's children. "Among the Nations of the Missouri are some who seem to be specially disposed to receive the Gospel ; as, for instance, the Panismahas. One of the gentlemen of whom I have just spoken wrote one day to a Frenchman who traded among the Savages and asked him in his letter to baptize dying children. When the chief of the village perceived the letter, he said to the Frenchman : ' What is the news?' 'There is none,' replied the latter. 'How,' retorted the Savage, 'because our color is red can we not know the news?' 'It is the black Chief.' replied the t "Jesuit Relations," vol. 69, p. 149. » "Jesuit Relations," vol. 69, p. 150. Kaskaskia and its Dependencies 79 Frenchman, 'who writes, recommending me to baptize dying children, in order to send them to the great Spirit. ' The Savage chief, thoroughly satisfied, said to him : 'Be not anxious I myself undertake to notify thee whenever a child is in danger of death. ' He gathered his people together and said to them: 'What think ye of this Black Chief?' (For that is the name which they give to the missionaries.) 'We have never seen him ; we have never done him any good ; he dwells far from us, beyond the sun. And yet he thinks of our village ; he wishes to do good to us ; and, when our children die, he wishes to send them to the great Spirit. This Black Chief must be very good.' "° Love and sympathy for the poor, the widow and the orphan also found lodgment in the heart of this Savage, as Vivier writes : ' ' Some traders who came from his village have mentioned to me instances which prove, that savage though he is, he none the less possesses intelligence and good sense. At the death of his predecessor all the suffrages of his Nation were in his favor. At first, he excused himself from accepting the position of Chief; but at last on being compelled to acquiesce, he said to them : ' ' You desire then that I should be your Chief ; I consent, but you must bear in mind that I wish to be your Chief in reality, and that I must be faithfully obeyed in that capacity. Hitherto the widows and orphans have been left destitute. I intend that in future their wants shall be provided for; and, in order that they may not be forgotten, I desire and intend that they shall be the first to get their share. ' ' 10 o "Jesuit Eelations," vol. 69, p. 225. io "Jesuit Eelations," vol. 69, p. 225. Chapter 11 ST. GENEVIEVE AND ITS DEPENDENCIES More than fifty years before the foundation of St. Louis under the direction of Pierre Laclede-Liquest and Auguste Chouteau, the mines of La Motte and Meramec engrossed the attention, not only of the French circles of Kaskaskia and Cahokia, but also of the nobles and even the royal court of France. The reign of Louis XIV and the regency of the Duke of Orleans had proved disastrous to the finances of the country. The Scotchman John Law was heralded as the great financial genius, who would, in some mysterious way, save the state, and lead it to the highest pinnacle of wealth and prosperity. For was not America infinitely rich in precious metals and pearls? Xew France was to be the pledge for the ever increasing debts of Old France. But promises would not satisfy forever. The gold and silver and other treasure must be found and sent to the coffers of the King. The peltries of the western world were, indeed, a source of wealth; yet gold and silver were immeas- urably better. As Spain had grown rich and powerful by the gold and silver of Peru and Mexico, so France must find the overflowing fountain of infinite treasure in the mines of the Mississippi Valley. The wish was father of the thought: absolute need was the mother of conviction. It was the first Governor of Louisiana under the Royal Company, the Sieur de la Mothe Cadillac, who actually visited the mineral region of the Aline La Mothe in Madison County in 171."), sinking a shaft there and taking out lead and silver ore. After him, in duly, 1710, came a company of noble prospectors from Kaskaskia under the leadership of the Sieur Mare Antoine de la Loire des Ursins to the mining country of South-east Missouri. They were brought there by some Tamaroa guides over the Indian trail through the valley of the Saline, near whose headwaters La Mothe Cadillac had opened his mine in 1715. In 1723 M. la Renaudier sent a report on the Mines of La Mothe and to the French government at Paris, from which it appears that both were being worked, but required for profitable production the help of slave labor. These slaves five hundred in number were brought to the mines by Philip Renault in 1723. They form the advance-guard of the large negro population of Missouri. From that time on until the present day the Mine a la Motto near the headwaters of the Saline, and the mines on the Southeastern tributary of the Meramec river, called the Riviere Negro, which preceded the present towns of Potosi, Old Mines and Mine a la Renaut were, from the start, dependent on Kaskaskia 's firs! born daughter, Ste. Genevieve, for commerce as well as spiritual succor. (80) St. Genevieve and Us Dependencies 83 The gateways to these earliest European settlements in the interior of Missouri, the mouth of the Saline Creek, on the south, and the mouth of the Meramec to the north, were easily aceessible from St. Genevieve, which gradually arose on the fruitful bottom lands that skirted the river between the Saline and the Gabori creeks. 1 ' ' The old Village of St. Gtnevieve ' ' is called by the most eminent his- torian of Missouri "the first permanent settlement in Upper Louisiana." 2 This claim cannot be upheld ; for even if the Post of Arkansas be counted for Lower Louisiana, Marest and Pinet's Kaskaskia, the village of French traders on the River des Peres, must be accorded precedence. 3 Yet the quaint old town of St. Genevieve has a long and interesting history. The old village, however, did not occupy the present site. It was three miles lower down, the river, and hard on its alluvial banks. In fact, the orginal site has long since fallen into the water. Yet there is enough land remaining of the so called Big Field, on the edge of which the Village stood, that we can form an idea of its former location. The date of the foundation of the Old Village is not positively known. There are a number of guesses with a foundation in fact. But, it must be remembered that there was no formal act or ceremony of foundation, but only a slow accretion of human habitations, on and near Francis Rivard's grant in the Big Field, which he held on condition, that he Avould eventually set aside a portion of it for a church. This grant was made in 1752 by Chevalier Makarty, Commandant of Fort Chart res and builder of the magnificent stone fort of that name. Other equally early settlers on the Big Field are Toussaint Geneaux, Chaponga and Dorlac. 4 Zenon Trudeau says in his report of 1798 that the Old Village "Was settled more than sixty years ago." 5 This would place the first settlement on the Big Field in 1738. Pittman, an English Officer who wrote in 1767 says: "The first settlers of the village removed about twenty-eight years ago from Kaskaskia," 6 that is, in 1739. As early as 1759 a Fort known as St. Joachim was located in the village of Ste. Gen- evieve as the Church Records show. Father Watrin's account 7 places the 1 For documents in proof of these statements, of. "Earliest History of Mine La Motte" by JohnRothonsteiner in "Missouri's Historical Review," vol. XXI, pp. 199-213. 2 Louis Houek, ' ' The History of Missouri, ' ' vol. I, p. 337. 3 Cf. the 5th Chapter o.f this History. "The Kaskaskias on the River des Peres." * Louis Houck, "A History of Missouri," vol. I, p. 338. 5 Trudeau 's Report "Concerning the Settlements of the Spanish Illinois Country, 1798" may be found in Houck 's "Spanish Regime in Missouri," vol. II, p. 247. 11 "Mississippi Settlements," p. 95. 7 "Banishment of the Jesuits," by Father Watrin, in "Jesuit Relations," vol. 70, p. 233. 82 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis establishment of what was then the new village, halfway between that of Trudeau — Pittman 1738-39, and that of the St. Genevieve Church Record 1758-59, or in other words at 1748 or 1749. It would seem then, (1) that the first grants of land in the Big- Field were made two or three years previous to that of Francis Rivard, (2) that the number of houses clustering around the church lot had gr%wn sufficiently numerous in 1749 to be called a village, and, (3) that the Spanish government thought it advisable to place a fort in the village sometime before 1759. Father Watrin called the village Ste. Genevieve : the Church Records call the Fort St. Joachim. Both designations of course, are historical. But whatever we may think of this calculation, this fact is beyond dispute : the Catholic Church was organized in Ste. Genevieve by the Jesuit Father Philibert Watrin in 1749, who had, no doubt, even prior to that year, come over from Kaskaskia on errands of charity to the sick and dying. When the first church was built we cannot tell. Father Watrin simply says, that the petition of the villagers to have a church built was granted them ; and that after this his visits became still more frequent. In a Marriage Record dated February 26, 1759, he called the church St. Joachim. He calls the people his new parishioners; but he did not take up his residence with them, as he was pastor of Kaskaskia, and they had no house for the priest. He must, however, cross the Mississippi in a canoe. Sometimes a storm would overtake him in his frail craft on the surging waters. But Father Watrin never failed in his duty, for more than fifteen years. At last, only a few years before the banishment of all the Jesuit Fathers, the people built a parish residence, and a special Pastor -was assigned to them as their first resident priest. The Record of Marriages in St. Genevieve opens with the name of Father Watrin, Father Morinie's following on January 1763 : 1759, Feb. 26th, Andre Deguire, dit Larose, Captain of Militia of the Fort of St. Joachim, to Marie La Boissiere, widow of Joseph Baron, of the Parish of St. Ann of Fort Chartres. (signed) Watrin 1760, Feb. 5th, Jean Baptiste Deguire, son of Andre Deguire and the deceased Elizabeth Brunet, to Cecil Baron, daughter of the deceased Joseph Baron and Marie La Boissiere. (signed) Watrin 1761, Jan. 7th, Andre Manterol, native of the town of St. Sebastian, to Angelique Pethius, widow of Etienne Govreau. (signed) Watrin 1763, Jan. 10th, Pierre Aubuchon, son of Pierre Aubuchon and Marie Brunet, to Charlotte Lalande, widow of LeCompt, daughter of Charlotte Marchaud and Jean Baptiste Lalande. (signed) La Morinie St. Genevieve and its Dependencies 83 The two first names that occur after that of Father Watrin in the Registers of Ste. Genevieve are Father Jean B. de la Morinie and Father Jean B. Salleneuve, both of the Society of Jesus. Neither one nor the other were members of the Illinois Mission. Father Morinie was born at Perigeux in France, October 24, 1704, and after becoming a member of the Society of Jesus, came to Canada in 1738. His name occurs in the Records of St. Anne, Detroit, in those of Mackinac from 1738-1752. After that he had charge of the Miami Mission at St. Joseph in what is now Niles, Michigan, from which the Indian war compelled him to flee in 1761. Hence he came to the Illinois country, and had only taken charge of the Church of Ste. Genevieve through the motive of a zeal that refuses itself nothing. From this it would appear that Father Jean de la Morinie was the first resident priest and quasi-pastor of Ste. Genevieve. 8 His companion in the care of this church, Father Jean B. Salleneuve came to Canada in 1743, at the age of thirty -five years, and was assigned to the Huron Mission near Detroit. He remained there until March 1761, when he, too, was compelled by the disturbances of the time to seek refuge in the Illinois country. Both Fathers, though only guests of the Illinois Mission, and in no wise under the control of the Superior Council of Xew Orleans, were expelled from the Country and sent back to France in 1764. 9 On February 28th, 1764, Father John B. Aubert, then Pastor of Kaskaskia, makes an entry on the Record : on May 14th, S. L. Meurin, Missionary Priest ; and from October 4th, 1768 to April 1772 alternately Fathers Meurin and Gibault. On May 18th. 1772, there occurs the name of the first resident priest of St. Louis, the Spanish Capuchin Valentin. On August 25th, 1772, we find his name once more with the designation : "Priest of St. Louis and its dependencies." Father Meurin, the Pastor of the place, since his return from Xew Orleans in 1765, was not allowed to officiate there on account of his having accepted from Quebec the office of Vicar General of the Illinois Country. The Spanish Com- mandant, Rocheblave, would not tolerate a priest who had his faculties from a foreign Bishop. But Rocheblave himself was discharged by the Spaniards in 1769, and entering the service of the English, received the appointment as Commandant of Kaskaskia, where George Rogers Clarke caught him napping on the night of July 4th, 1778. Don Francisco Valle, received the appointment as Civil and Military Com- mandant of St. Genevieve in 1769. In 1772 the village numbered 404 whites and 387 slaves. On the 15th of November 1773, the newly 8 "The St. Joseph Baptismal Record," edited by Eev. George Pare, and M. M. Quaif e, in ' ' Mississippi Valley Historical Review, ' ' vol. 13, No. 2. 9 Father Salleneuve is mentioned in the "Jesuit Catalogue of 1756," with date of birth, (June 14, 1708), and of entrance into the Order, (September 21, 1727), as being stationed "in remote regions." 84 History of th( Archdiocese of St. Louis appointed Pastor of the parish of St. Genevieve, the Capuchin Hilaire de Genevaux. performed bis firsl priestly function in the village church. 10 Sometime before this date he bad figured in a violent quarrel with Father Baudouin, S. J. the Vicar-General of the Bishop of Quebec, about the Vicar-Generalship in Louisiana, which he claimed, belonged to him, asserting that the Bishop of Quebec had only the right to oversee and to give encouragement, and no more. lie had appealed to Rome for a decision : but received none. Yet, he returned as apostolic Prothon- otary, and caused more trouble to the Jesuit Vicar-General. When the Jesuits were banished in 1763, the Superior of the Capuchins, Father Dagobert de Longwi became Vicar-General of Quebec for Louisiana. The restless Father Hilaire soon got into a quarrel with Father Dagobert also, from which Father Dagobert emerged victorious. 11 Father Hilary may have considered his appointment to the village in the far northern wilder- ness as an exile, and consequently took little interest in the administration of the parish. On dune 6, 1774, the habitants of Ste. Genevieve sent a remonstrance against Father Hilary to Don Pedro Piernas, the lieutenant Governor : "The undersigned habitants of Saint Genevieve find it necessary to demand your justice against an attempt of Father Hilary. If that attempt were carried out, it would deprive them of their lands. We were strangely surprised on hearing him announce to us last Sunday that we were to pay him the tenth of all the produce of our lands, although he is not at all ignorant that hitherto we have paid no more than the tewenty-sixth part; that a constant and uninterrupted custom has, without doubt, been regulated to our days by the royal power and the ecclesiastical assembly ; and that His Catholic Majesty, fortunately, and according to all the wise laws to which we are and always shall be very submissive, has not considered it advisable to inform us that he has changed anything in this regard. Consequently, it cannot be annulled by one single religious. We are surprised at seeing this attempt made by a religious, who, since he has been among us, has given no instruction to the children or preached a sermon or given an exhortation to his parishioners. We have not in any way endeavored to relax the old custom in regard to Father Hilary, and we would be willing, if our power permitted, to make a greater sacrifice, but our poverty does not permit us to do it, for we find it very difficult to support our families. We pay a fifth (a royal tax) to the mill (i. e. the fifth of the meal ground as a toll) as well as the defence of our boundaries; the beadle serves him for twenty sols per livre; labor is excessively clear, as well as the things io "The Spanish Regime in Missouri," vol. I, p. 54. 11 The struggle of Father Hilaire de Geneveaux against the Jesuits and then against his superior Father Dagobert is authentically, though not always judicially, discussed by the historian of Louisiana, "The Spanish Domination," pp. 49-94. St. Genevieve and its Dependencies 85 of the first and indispensable need. Another surprise on our part was for us to hear that Father Hilary has forbidden us all spiritual aid from the religious of the other bank (of the river) in his absence. We are unaware of the reason which imposes so severe a law upon us." 12 The complaint was forwarded to Don Louis de Unzaga, the Governor, who answered on February 20, 1775, that, the custom shall not be altered in any way, and that is it not right, while the King supports the parish priests, for them to expect another fee, which would mean a double compensation and a very large one." 13 The Apostolic Prothonotary's neglienee in keeping the Records in good order was severely reprimanded by his Superior, Bishop Cyrillo de Barcelona, acting for the Bishop of Havana, Cuba. Father Bernard de Limpach, was ordered to go to St. Genevieve to enter all the missing records of Baptisms and Marriages. This was done in September 1778. From October 1778 to May 1786, Father Pierre Gibault, signing himself "priest," administered all the baptisms, being accepted by the Spanish authorities as administrator of the Parish until a pastor could be sent from New Orleans. On September 27, 1778, the parishioners of the old village, in a meeting held under the auspices of the Commandant, de Cartabona, and the Parish Priest of St. Louis and its Dependencies, P. Bernard de Limpach, decided to remove the Church from the river bank to a more elevated location on the land of Charles Valle. In the year of 1782, the inhabitants of the Old Village, fearing the encroachment of the river, began "pen a peu, " as Father Dahmen says, to remove their homes three miles northward to the more elevated ground of the present site of Ste. Genevieve. In the 3 r ear of the great waters, "L' Annee des Grandes Eaux." Father de Saint Pierre arrived from Vincennes and remained until his house in Cahokia should be completed. (May 18th, 1785-July 10th, 1786.) On September 11th, 1786, Father Louis Guignes, of the Order of Capuchins, appears on the scene and remains as Pastor of St. Genevieve and its Dependencies until November, 1788. One of these dependencies, is the old Parish of the Post of Arkansas, the cherished foundation of Henri de Tonti. Father Guignes, as Pastor of St. Genevieve, visited the place a few times during his incumbency and administered the sacrament of Baptism to thirty-seven persons, eleven of whom were Indians. Five marriages also were solemnized on these occasions. Father Guignes had his residence in the new village in a house that was bought from M. Roussin, and was fitted up for a presbytere. Father Paul de Saint Pierre succeeded to the pastorate of St. Genevieve in 1789. 14 12 "The Spanish Regime in Missouri," vol. I, p. 121 s. is "The Spanish Regime in Missouri, " vol. I, p. 125. i-i M. S. material in "Spanish Archives'' in possession of Missouri Historical Society. Chapter 12 BANISHMENT OF THE JESUITS This chapter records the final act of the wonderful drama of divine inspiration enacted by the Jesuit Fathers in the Mississippi Vallej r , from the last quarter of the seventeenth, to almost the last quarter of the eighteenth Centuries. Like the story of the Jesuit Missions on the St. Lawrence riv ::5. " : Ibidem, p. 237. i- Ibidem, p. 241. Banishment of the Jesttits 93 "Several years before, Father Carette had left his post ; his brethren had decided that he ought to have left it sooner. In spite of the little hope that there was of leading the savages of the place to Christianity, the Father studied their language a long time, and labored to correct the morals of the French, but reaped hardly any fruit from his toil. He nevertheless followed both the French and the savages in their various changes of location, occasioned by the overflowing of the Mississippi, near which the Poste is situated. Notwithstanding so many annoyances, the missionary Avas not discouraged at seeing his efforts rendered useless by the conduct of those who ought to have sustained them ; he continued in patience, until the event which we are about to describe. In the fort of the Arkansas there was no longer a chapel, no longer any room wherein one could say mass, except the room where the commandant took his meals. This was not a very suitable place, not only because is was a din- ing room, but on account of the bad conduct and freedom of langu- age of those who frequented it ; everything that was in the fort entered there, even to the fowls. A chicken, flying over the altar, overturned the chalice, which had been left there at the end of the mass. The spectators were not affected by this ; one of those who ought to have been most concerned about it, exclaimed : 'Ah ! behold the shop of the good God thrown down ! ' To these sentiments, so little religious, corresponded a life as little Christian. Father Carette at last concluded that he must withdraw, at least until he should see a chapel built in the fort, and until they were disposed to respect religion there ; besides, he was necessary elsewhere, for work from which better success was expected." 18 We have now recounted the substance of the able defense made by Father Watrin against the traducers of his Brother Jesuits of the Illinois country. Not, indeed, before the Superior Council at New Orleans, was it spoken, not in any public assembby was it heard. But, within his own conscience, serene as the deep blue of heaven, in the very presence of God. In his letter he gave but the transcript of what he thought and felt in the dark days of September 1763. What happened next is recounted in the same letter : Meanwhile, the courier despatched to the Illinois to bear the decree, arrived on the night of September 23rd, at Fort Chartres, distant six leagues from the residence of the Jesuits. He delivered to the procurator of the king the commission which charged him to execute the decree ; and on the next day, about eight or nine o'clock in the morning, that officer of justice repaired to the house of the Jesuits, accompanied by the registrar and the bailiff of that jurisdiction. Some clays afterward, he tried to turn to account the moderation that he had used in not arriving during the night, "as his orders directed," said he ; with that exception, they ought to have been satisfied with his exactness. He read to Father Watrin, the Superior, is "Jesuit Relations," 1. c-it., p. 269. 94 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis the decree of condemnation, and, having given him a copy of it, he made him at once leave his room to put the seal npon it ; the same thing was done with the other missionaries who happened to be in the house. There remained one hall where they could remain together, although with great inconvenience; but this favor was refused them, because the guards placed in custody of the property seized, opposed this ; they were unwilling that the Jesuits should be able to watch their conduct so closely. The procurator of the King feared to displease these guardians, and would not permit the Jesuits to remain at the house of one of their confreres — who being Cure of the place, had his private lodging near the parish church ; they did not put the seal thereon, because there was nothing there to seize. The missionaries, driven from their own house, found quarters as best they could. The Superior, sixty-seven years old. departed on foot to find a lodging, a long league away, with a confrere of his, a missionary to the savages ; and the French who met him on this journey groaned to see persecution begin with him. As soon as the savages learned that he had arrived among them, they came to show to him and to Father Meurin, his associate, the share which they took in the distress of their Fathers : the news of their condemnation had already caused many tears to be shed in the village. They were asked why they were thus treated, especially in a country where so many disorders had been so long allowed. The old missionary, after several repeated inter- rogations, finally replied ; Arechi Kiecuegane t chichi ki canta manghi — It is because we sternly condemn their follies. They comprehended the meaning of this answer — indeed, they knew that the Jesuits, in whatever place they may be established, consider themselves bound by their profession to com- bat vice; and that, in fighting it, they make enemies for themselves." 1 " They wished, then, to ask that at least the chapel and the house of the missionary be preserved, in order that the best instructed person among them might assemble the children and repeat the prayers to them ; and that every Sunday and Feastday he might summon those who prayed — that is to say, the Christians — by the ringing of the bell, to fulfill as well as possible the duties of religion. They did, in fact, make such a request, and obtained what they asked. There was no delay in presenting, in the name of nearly all the habitants, a petition addressed to the commandant and the commissary of the country, in order to secure the retention of at least Father Aubert, the Cure of French Kaskaskia ; and as the answer seemed to be deferred too long a time, a little while afterward a second petition was sent. "While waiting for an answer to this, the more intelligent of the habitants asked by what right the govern- ment had taken possession of the property of the Jesuits ; and what power it had over their persons in a country ceded by the treaty of peace to the 19 "Jesuit Relations," 1. cit., p. 275. Banishment of the Jesitils 95 crown of England. Above all, they Avere indignant at the seizure made of the sacred vessels of a chapel belonging to the Hurons of Detroit, which Father Salleneuve, missionary to that nation, had brought to the Illinois country, when he had taken refuge there, two and a half years before. There was another cause for astonishment : this Father, who had come from Detroit, and Father de la Morinie, from the post of Saint Joseph, did not belong to Louisiana, but to Canada; it was extreme want that had obliged them to withdraw to the country of the Illinois, and they had remained there only for lack of the necessary opportunities to return to their posts. Father Salleneuve had no work in the Illinois mission, and Father de la Morinie had only taken charge of the church of Sainte Genevieve through the motive of a zeal that refuses itself to nothing; it was plain that the Council of New Orleans ought to have neither known nor thought of them. But those who had the authority in Illinois did not think thus, and the Jesuits submitted to every interpretation that the officials chose to give to the decree." 20 Mean- while, the auction Avas finished; the house, the furniture, the cattle, the lands, had been sold; the slaves were to be taken to New Orleans, to be sold there for the benefit of the king; and the chapel was to be razed by the man to whom the house had been adjudged. The Jesuits were then permitted to re-enter their former home, the use of which was, by a clause inserted in the bill of sale, reserved to them until their embarkation. They found their chapel in a still more melancholy condition; after the sacred vessels and the pictures had been taken away, the shelves of the altar had been thrown down, the linings of the ornaments had been given to negresses decried for their evil lives; and a large crucifix, which had stood above the altar, and the chandeliers, were found placed above a cupboard in a house whose reputation was not good. To see the marks of spoliation in the chapel, one might have thought that it was the enemies of the Catholic religion who had caused it." 21 The Jesuits were forced to leave not only their missions, but the country of their adoption also. Their mighty organization as one of the great Orders of the Church was suppressed and they themselves were homeless wanderers. Yet, in due time the Society of Jesus was to rise again from the ruins ; and Jesuit Fathers of a younger generation, but of equal "faith and daring and religious zeal," were destined to come and continue the work their brothers had so grandly inaugurated one hundred and fifty years before. 20 "Jesuit Relations," I. cit., p. 276. 2i Ibidem, p. 279. PART ONE THE ERA OF PREPARATION BOOK II The Church in the Valley during the Transition Period Vol. I— 1 tf* 5 J u t«< w tift Q - Q - < m a sc. a : OX b : i 3 II o a. C £ ffl O D o BOOK II Chapter 1 THE FOUNDING OF ST. LOUIS It is a memorable coincidence that, at the very time the Jesuit Fathers at Kaskaskia were, with saddened hearts, making their prepa- rations for the voyage down the river to New Orleans and to exile, another party arrived from New Orleans seeking with anxious but hope- ful hearts a place where they might establish their trading station and their home. Neither one knew of the other. And yet the leader of the traders and trappers was destined in his own way to further the great work which the others had to relinquish. The foundation of St. Louis by Laclede-Liguest was, under the Providence of God, the means of sending out the rays of divine truth, as from a central orb, into all the dark expanses of the Mississippi Valley. They are but traders, voyageurs and coureurs de bois, men of a hardy race, not over-religious, though Catholic at heart, every one of them. There is no priest among them. Laclede-Liguest is of noble lineage: the members of the firm he represents are merchant-princes, enjoying the confidence of the government. Their letters-patent or charter as we would say, grant to them the exclusive right of trading with the Indians on the Missouri River. They have brought along a large assortment of goods to give in exchange for the skins and peltries of the northern wilds. In Ste. Genevieve, the only European settle- ment of importance on the left bank of the river, M. Laclede-Liguest could find no magazine large enough for storing his merchandise. Be- sides, it is too far removed from the Missouri River. He therefore, determines to found a new town as near as possible to the watery high- way that should carry his boats and pirogues to the waters of the North- west. For the time being, he finds a cheerful shelter at Fort Chartres with its commandant Noyon de Villiers and St. Ange de Bellerive, who are waiting rather eagerly for the arrival of the English garrison. After his business affairs have been arranged by the dispatch of his bateaux and pirogues to the Indian nations along the Missouri and the Mississippi, Laclede finds time and inclination to think about his higher projects. In company with the young Auguste Chouteau he sets out on a journey to find the best location for his proposed village and (99) 100 History of the Archdiocese of 8t. Louis discovers it, to his great delight, on a rocky eminence of the river front, covered with a fine grove of walnut trees, a few miles below the junction of the two great rivers. "You will come here as soon as navigation opens," said Laclede to Chouteau, "and will cause this place to be cleared, in order to form our settlement after the plan that I shall give you." 1 On his return to Fort Charlies Laclede is reported to have said to M. de Noyon and his officers, that he had found a location for his settlement which might become, hereafter, "one of the finest cities of America." 2 The rest of the winter was spent in maturing the plan for his city and procuring the things necessary for the commencement of his new settlement. Having hired a number of workmen from the villages and towns along the river, he sent them in boats to the site he had chosen and marked. Auguste Chouteau was in command of the expedition. This was on the 15th day of February 1764. The first house built was intended for the storage of Laclede's merchandise, which he was bound to remove from Fort Chartres before the arrival of the English. Smaller cabins were built for the members of the expedition. In the early part of April Laclede arrived among Chouteau's company of builders. He laid down the lines for the streets of the new village, fixed the place of his own house, assigned one block for religious purposes and designated another as the Place des Armes and then, to crown his work, named the new foundation, St. Louis, in honor of St. Louis IX, the patron saint of the King of France. A party of French Cahokians came as mere onlookers but decided to stay. Yet, when a large band of Missouri Indians suddenly appeared with friendly intentions, but over- friendly importunities, the Cahokians departed for home, and Laclede himself had to be brought up from Fort Chartres to restore order and peace. Thus proceeded the work of raising the village of St. Louis on the natural foundation of the wind-swept eminence hard by the river and drawing by its beauty and youthful vigor many of the habitants from Cahokia, St. Philip, Fort Chartres and Kaskaskia to build their hearths and homes there, and to live and die, as they thought, under the Lilies of France. Auguste Chouteau in his Journal of the ' ' Founding of St. Louis," relates some of the particulars of this migration. After stating how Monsieur Laclede had done all in his power to prevent the French families of the Illinois country, who naturally dreaded the regime of England, and its heretical king, from going with the i "Journal of the Founding of St. Louis," by Auguste Chouteau, in "Missouri Historical Society Collections," vol. IV, p. 351. 2 Chouteau's Journal, p. 352. Bishop Briand of Quebec, in 1769, had predicted that Cahokia would eventually be the center of religion in the Illinois Country. He was mistaken, but his guess as to the Location of the eenter was not very far from being right. The Founding of St. Louis 101 French commander de Noyon down to New Orleans, young Chouteau continues, saying that he, on the contrary, advised them to go up the liver to his own new settlement on the French side, promising at the same time, that he would cheerfully furnish them with the necessary means of transporting them and their families and their property to their future abode. "Several families accepted these offers" he writes, "and obtained immediately the wagons and harness to proceed to St. Louis, M. Laclede-Liguest, aided them in settling, and ordered me to assign them lands, according to the plan he had made, which I did as exactly as possible." 3 The people from Cahokia also returned, forming with the thirty families from Fort Chartres and St. Philip, Laclede's original followers, the "compact body required to give permanence to St. Louis. Fort Chan res had nothing left of its population save the garrison, soon to be withdrawn. The village of Nouvelle Chartres with the chapel of St. Anne, lay in ruins, the departing villagers having taken along the boards, the -windows and the door-frames and everything else they could transport to the places where they intended to settle." 4 As for the Indians of the Kaskaskia Missions, Chouteau tells us, that the great chief of the Ottawas, Pontiac, forced them to join him in his proposed attack upon the English, saying to them: "If you hesitate one moment, I will destroy you, like the fire which passes through a prairie : Open wide your ears, and remember it is Pontiac who speaks." 5 It has been remarked by some writers as rather strange that no priest lent his presence to the grand occasion of the foundation of St. Louis. On all similar occasions heretofore the Church was represented by mem- bers of priesthood; The Vexilla Regis or the Te Dcum Laudamus as- cended to God in praise and thanksgiving and humble petition, whilst the smoke of incense floated on the air and the salute of the guns announced that the place belonged to God and the King. Why the exception in the case of St. Louis? Laclede and his followers were Catholics and loved the splendor of the Catholic service. But here there is no hymn, no ceremony, no mass, no priest. The explanation is not far to seek. Whilst young Chouteau and his chief and friend Laclede are busy with the preliminaries of the founding of their village, the only priest remaining in the vast territory of Upper Louisiana, the Recollet Luke Collet, bowed down by the weight of years and infirmities, is in hiding for fear of the British soldiery : and Father Meurin, the expelled Jesuit of Kaskaskia Mission, is in New Orleans, in enforced exile, begging his unjust jailors of the Superior Council to permit him to return to his poor Indians and French on the banks of the Miss- issippi. Father Meurin, after a toilsome voyage, arrived at Kaskaskia 3 Chouteau 's Journal, passim. 4 Chouteau's Journal, p. 361. 5 Chouteau's Journal, p. 361. 102 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis in mid-summer, 1764, having loft New Orleans in the middle of Feb- ruary. "We have every reason to suppose," says one who made an exhaustive study of the good Father's life, "that if Father Meurin had been allowed to leave New Orleans when he desired, he would have witnessed the historic act."" But although he was not present at the city's birth, he nevertheless can claim the distinction of being the pioneer priest of St. Louis, by virtue of his visits in 1766, and his frequent ministrations there in the three following years. As the people had not as yet succeeded in building a church, Father Meurin must have said mass in the home of some one of the better situated families. This is the usual way of founding missions or parishes. First come the visits of the priest and the services of the church in any decent though primitive locality, as a private residence, an assembly room, a tent or even the open air ; the building of a church comes later. So it happened that the first Baptism, Father Meurin, priest of "Our Lady of the Cahokias, " administered in St. Louis took place in a tent, as the first entry in the record shows. The child baptized was named Mary Deschamps, and the Baptism is said to have been "in the country of the Illinois, in St. Louis, in a tent for want of a church." The second St. Louis child baptized by Father Meurin was Antoine, son of Lizette, a Pawnee slave. This Baptism was on the 9th of May 17(56. Auguste Chouteau's mother, Marie Therese Chouteau, had come up the river from New Orleans with her five children, two sons and three daughters, landing at Fort Chartres on November 3, 1763, after a voyage of three months. The husband, August Rene Chouteau, remained in New Orleans. Mrs. Chouteau spent the winter 1763-64 in Fort Chartres, but in March proceeded to Cahokia, where she awaited the completion of her house in St. Louis. In September she came over to the new village, the first white woman in St. Louis. She is affectionately regarded as "The Mother of St. Louis." The scandalous legend as to her relations with Laclede-Liguest broadcast by Billon and Paul Beckwith was exploded by Alexander N. De Menil in his Madame Chouteau Vindicated. The assertion that the Catholic clergy of New Orleans and of St. Louis connived at the supposed adulterous relations of Laclede and Mrs. Chouteau, and that she was permitted to approach the sacraments, as she certainly was, in spite of a notorious concubinage, is too silly to merit attention. Yet, the libel was believed by many for upwards of ninety years. The fact is now established that the mother of St. Louis, was "a true, honest and respectable wife and mother," in spite of the other fact that she left her cruel husband on two occasions, in 1750, after the birth of August, and in 1763, after the birth of her last child, Marie Therese. A reconciliation of the two spirited persons had been 6 "Sebastian Louis Meurin," by Charles H. Metzger, S. J., in "Illinois Cath- olic Historical Eeview, vol. Ill, p. 372. The Founding of St. Louis 103 effected in 1757, which lasted until 1763. Her husband died in the summer, 177G, and Madame Chouteau and her five children did not inherit from him. 7 The first Catholic Church, a small log-house, was erected in 1770, on the Church-lot assigned by Laclede, and was blessed on the 24th of June of the same year, not by Father Gibault, as is generally said, but by Father Meurin himself. In the absence of the priest in charge, the burials were generally performed by some layman that held a sub- ordinate position in the church, as the chantre or the sacristan. In the early days it was one Rene Kiercereau, that attended to this office from October 1770 to March 1772, and recorded the burial of nineteen whites, ten negroes, and five Indians. The next priest to inscribe his name and title on the Church Records of St. Louis was the celebrated Father Pierre Gibault, "Parish Priest of the Immaculate Conception of Our Lady of Kaskaskia and Vicar General of My Lord, the Bishop of Quebec. ' ' Father Gibault served the Church of St. Louis from June 1770 to January 1772. The population of St. Louis was even then a strange mixture of many types ; there were retired hunters and trappers and boatmen from Canada, farmers from Lower Louisiana, Spanish soldiers and traders, Indian and Negro slaves, native Creoles from the towns beyond the river, adventurers from France and Spain, some of them men of gentle birth and culture. But, as diversified as these elements were, there ran through all the tangled skein the golden thread of a common religion, uniting them into one family, the family of God. Religion was to them, not a mere thing of the intellect, much less a soothing appeal to the sense, nor a system of philosophy, though it was all this and more ; Religion was to them the first and foremost duty and privilege, the life of the spirit permeating, vivifying and uniting into one body the men and women that had received Christ by Faith. 8 All that had so far been accomplished in the Mississippi Valley in regard to civilization was due to the spirit of Catholicism, the proudest possession of the French pioneers. Now, in spite of the English regime to the east and the Spanish regime to the west of the river, the French, influence remained dominant. St. Louis was in many ways a replica of Kaskaskia and Cahokia. Crime was hardly known. Justice was administered in a fatherly way either by the priest or by some one chosen from "the ancients," as Father Roux styles the elder citizens. The announcements of sales and other publications were made on Sundays from the church steps. There were some minor offices 7 Billon, F. L., "Annals of St. Louis, 1764-1804," p. 412. "Madam Chouteau Vindicated," Alexander N. DeMenil, in "Globe-Democrat," October 16, 1921. s They were the children of the France before the Eevolution, still worthy of the ancient name, ' ' The First Daughter of the Church. ' ' 104 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis in the church, held by Laymen, the clianter or singer who, in the absence of the priest, was empowered to perforin the burial service; the sacristan or verger, and the Suisse whose office it was to keep order during the divine service. The church, with all that it implied, was the center of the people's life in French and Spanish days. "Learning none had, unless it was the parish priest, and he, their oracle in matters of faith, could be taken likewise as their voucher in matters of science," as Scliarf 9 remarks. Their honor and good name was their great treasure. Their hospitality was proverbial; every latch-string hung out and every man's house was the stranger's. Punctuality and honesty in all dealings, politeness and courtesy to strangers, friendship and cordiality among neighbors, gentle kindness and affection at home, reverence for elders, respect for superiors, and justice to all, were among the social virtues prevalent among this primitive people. "Contented with little and happy with more," seems to have been their rule of life. They had no politics, save loyalty to France, and a dim belief that, the King of France was monarch of all the earth, or at least ought to be. Care and worry found no lodgement at their fireside. "God is in His heaven," they said, "All is right with the world." "Amusements, festivals and holidays were natural among such a people. They were too devout not to keep every Fete in the calendar, and too fond of enjoyment not to wish there were twice as many more. Neither sex nor condition were kept from these festive enjoyments ; pleas- ure was like the church floor, free to all without distinction of quality. The black slave danced to the same fiddle that sent his mistress and master tripping, and the stolid Indian sat by on his haunches, wrapped in his blanket, watching and wondering. It has become a proverb, the contentment and happiness of the negro slaves in French Illinois. All were Catholics and all kept the festivals of the great Mother Church in the same indentical spirit." 10 In our far less joyous days some may wonder at the levity displayed by these people, others may even raise eye-brows in solemn disapproval. Yet, as Stoddard writes "It must be confessed that the French people avoid all intemperate and immoral excesses, and conduct themselves with apparent decorum." 11 And Scharf is fair enough to add his favorable judgment: "It seems certain that to their honest religious convictions, and the candor with which they obeyed them, the habitants of Upper Louisiana owed much of that sterling business integrity and that rigid adherence to o "History of St. Louis," vol. I, p. 281. io "History of St. Louis," by Scharf, vol. I, p. 282. n "Sketches of Louisiana," Stoddart, p. 316. The Founding of St. Louis 105 truth in all its forms which always excited the surprise and admiration of strangers." 12 The village of St. Louis had not yet kept the second anniversary of its birth, when it received a garrison of thirty men and a Commandant, October 1765. A valuable accession it was, as all were Frenchmen and stood under the command of Laclede's special friend, St. Ange de Bellerive. But what business had a French commandant on the soil that was now known to belong to Spain? Was his authority in St. Louis self-constituted, or did he rule by popular action or acclamation? Nothing of the kind. St. Ange held the same power in all parts of the Illinois country that Noyon de Villiers had exercised, in the name of the King of France, until the Spanish government should have taken actual possession. So he was just as much in authority on the Missouri side as he had been on the Illinois side, until the coming of Captain Sterling to Fort Chartres. In fact, the Spanish authorities in New Orleans in 1769 treated St. Ange as the representative of the Spanish government, and when Don Alexandre O'Reilly, the Spanish Governor of the Province of Louisiana, ordered that all subjects of the colony who wished to remain under the domina- tion of his Catholic Majesty, must take the oath of allegiance, it was "Captain St. Ange de Bellerive, Commandant of the Spanish Colony of Illinois," that was appointed to make them take it in this form: "That they promise and swear to God and to his Catholic Majesty, to be faithful to him and to sacrifice their lives for his service, to warn him or his commandants of anything coming to their knowledge pre- judicial to his state or to the support of his crown and of his person, and to live under the laws it shall please his said Catholic Majesty to impose on them." 13 The settlers of St. Louis, whether cheerfully or not, actually took the oath of fidelity to the Spanish King, on November 9, 1769. On February 17, 1770, three months after the date of this occurrence, St. Ange resigned, and Don Pedro Piernas, the first Spanish Lieutenant- governor, assumed the government of the Illinois country (St. Louis and dependencies.) It is said that when Captain Stirling, the first English commander at Fort Chartres, died in January 1776, on the request of the inhabi- tants there, St. Ange came over from the Spanish possessions to take charge of the post of Fort <'hartres until the arrival of Captain Stirling's 12 "History of St. Louis," by Seharf, p. 283. 13 According to Seharf, as well as to Shepard, the government of St. Louis under St. Ange was self -constituted. This is not the case. St. Ange was appointed "Captain, Commanding the Spanish Colony of Illinois," by Count O'Reilly, Governor of the Province of Louisiana, ef. "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. TV, p. 243 s. 10G History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis successor, Captain Frazer, from Pittsburgh. This romantic incident is a fiction, as St. Ange was then no longer among the living, having died December 27, 1774, at the home of Madame Chouteau.- St. Ange was never married. In his will which was made December 27, 1774, he bequeaths 25 livres for Masses and 500 livres for the construction of the church of St. Louis. The funeral services for St. Ange de Bellerive were performed by Father Valentine, a Capuchin Monk, from New Orleans, who held his faculties from the Bishop of Santiago de Cuba, to whom the jurisdiction had now passed from the Bishop of Quebec. The Record of Burials shows (he following entry: "In the year 1774, 27th of December, I the undersigned, have interred in the cemetery of this parish the body of Don Louis de St. Ange, Captain attached to the battalion of Louisiana, having administered the sacraments of the church. Fr. Valentine." Father Valentine in official acts styles himself "Priest of the Parish of St. Louis and its dependencies," a title that does not fully square with facts. St. Louis at that time was no parish in the Canonical sense, but only a mission. No doubt, the zealous Capuchin, was regularly appointed to St. Louis, but most likely as the chaplain for the garrison that came with Lieutenant Governor Piernas, just as the unnamed chaplain that accompanied the expedition of Don Francisco Rui 14 to build the Forts at the mouth of the Missouri River in March 1767, three years previous to the advent of Piernas. When Rui set out from New Orleans to the Miss- ouri River, he was instructed to take along with him a chaplain, (name not given) who was to say mass on shore every Sunday and Feast-day, before day-break, at which all the company were to assist. He was moreover enjoined to recite the Rosary with the crew every night, as is usual on the warships of Spain." 15 We suspect that the unnamed chaplain of Rui's expedition was no one else than Father Valentine, and that, after the relief of Rui by Piernas, and the subsequent appointment of Piernas to the poste of St. Louis, he came with Piernas to serve as the priest of the mission of St. Louis and its dependencies. As the Lieutenant Gov- ernor could not erect Parishes or appoint parish Priests, the Capuchin, Father Valentine cannot be called the first Pastor of St. Louis, but only its first resident priest. He remained from May 1772 to June 1775, and during that period baptized sixty-five whites, twenty-four negroes and eighteen Indians. He also solemnized four marriages of whites and officiated at the interment of forty-two whites, eleven negroes and nine- ii Thirteen documents in regard to Don Francisco Bui's voyage to the mouth of the Missouri and the erection of the forts at this place are given by Houck, in ' ' Spanish Regime in Missouri, ' ' vol. I, pp. 1-52. St. Ange 's name is always men- tioned with respect. is "Spanish Regime in Missouri," vol. I, p. 4. The Founding of St. Louis 107 teen Indians. Until now Father Valentine had. been officiating in the little log-church of Father Menrin's time and lived in the adjoining presbytere, as the priest's residence was then called. But he prevailed upon Governor Piernas to build a new church, more in keeping with the growing importance and dignity of St. Louis. Judge Wilson Primm, a scion of some of the earliest and best families of St. Louis, has given us a very interesting account of the erection of the second church-building in the village under the administration of Don Pedro Piernas. In a lecture delivered before the Missouri Historical Society he adverted to a drawing that had been made under his personal direction, representing the old church that had been demolished in 1820, according to the Government Record: "On the 26th of December 1774, the inhabitants of St. Louis met together in the government chamber in presence of Don Pedro Piernas, Lieutenant Governor of the Establishment of Illinois and of the dependencies belonging to his Catholic Majesty, of Reverend Father Valentine and Mr. Sarpy, Principal Church-warden, and deter- mined upon the building of a church. The church is to be sixty feet long and thirty feet in width and is to be built of posts set in the ground. The posts are to be eighteen feet long hewed on both sides, to the width of six inches above ground, and to be of very sound white oak, and the square of the church to be fourteen feet high. The inhabitants are to furnish all the wood and other materials necessary for the construction of the building, according to an assessment to be made on each white and black person of the age of fourteen years and upwards, excepting wives and persons sixty years of age, who shall be exempt as to their persons only." 16 The superintendent of the building and of the assessments is Pierre Baron, who, being present, accepts the office and promises to do his duty. The inhabitants add to him, Rene Kiercereau, Antoine Riviere, dit Bacasset, Joseph Taillon and Jacques Moise, ' ' who must be present at the assessment and at the furnishing of materials." 17 ' ' There is to be a gallery around the church five feet wide supported by posts of good wood, set into the ground." 18 The specifications were now worked out by the Committee and at their completion another Parish meeting was held in the chamber of the parsonage of said Parish of St. Louis, at the termination of Parochial Mass, for the purpose of letting out to the lowest bidder the ' ' labor and construction of the church proposed to be erected." 19 The specifications were read and explained with loud and intelligible voice. The lowest bid was that of Pierre Lupin Baron, carpenter and is Printed in "The Church Progress, " of St. Louis, February Is, 1917. 17 Ibidem. is Ibidem. is Ibidem. 108 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis joiner, "at the sum of twelve hundred livres in shaved deer skins, merchantable at this Post." Don Pedro Piernas signed the contract the 19th day of April 1775. But the building contractor, Pierre Baron, dying on the 28th day of January 1776, another Parish meeting was called by the new Lieutenant Governor Don Francisco Cruzat, at which the work under the same conditions was let out to Jean Cambas, he being the lowest bidder, at the sum of fourteen hundred and eighty livres, in shaved deer skins. The only new condition was that the building must be completed by the cud of May. Father Valentine did not enjoy his new church ; for in June 1776 he was on his way down to New Orleans, never to return. To the people of St. Louis it must have been a source of regret to hear that their priest, Father Valentine, had suddenly departed, June 6, 1775, and would not return. Rumor was busy with the mysterious event. A letter arrived from Cahokia at M. Dutelets home in St. Louis, in which Father Valen- tine gives as his reason for his strange conduct, the fear of compromising the new Governor, M. Cruzat and himself. 20 The Capuchin Friar did not tarry at Kaskaskia, as some have stated, but went directly to New Orleans to report to his Superior. We found his name in the Register of the Post of Arkansas, as having baptized thirty-five persons on April 19, 1772, one month before his coming to St. Louis. This would show that he came directly from New Orleans, stopping off for a day or two at the Post. Later on we find Father Valentine at Cote des Allemands, and at Iberville. (1778-81.) 20 His household goods were sold at auction after his departure from St. Louis. The catalogue of the sale is preserved in the Spanish Archives of the Missouri His- torical Society at the Jefferson Memorial, St. Louis. yjwvaw Je uwpcubftu. X^Li^^ty»r~£y *' 6) -^ - 6&^0?J&mK SIGNATURES OF ST. LOUIS PRIESTS AND PRELATES Chapter 2 CIVIL ALLEGIANCE AND ECCLESIASTICAL AUTHORITY The battle of Quebec, in which Montcalm was killed, September 18th, 1759, sounded the death-knell of the power of France in the New World. But the last agony was protracted for a few years. By the Treaty of Paris, February 10th, 1763, Canada, Nova Scotia, Cape Breton and the French possessions to the East of the Mississippi, New Orleans excepted, were ceded to England. This great river thus became the boundary between the English and French. But the extreme weakness of France, at the close of the seven years war had previously led to another act, that eventually retired the French from the North-American Continent. On the 3rd of November 1762, the Marquis of Grimaldi, the Ambassador of Spain, and the Duke de Choiseul, the French Premier, signed at Fontainebleau an Act by which the French King ceded to His Cousin of Spain, and to his succes- sors forever, in full ownership, from the pure impulse of a generous heart the Country under the name of Louisiana. The Spanish monarch, rather reluctantly accepted the donation tendered to him by the gener- osity of his Most Christian Majesty, his cousin Louis XV. From that date, November 13th, 1762, the Illinois Country west of the Mississippi, as well as Lower Louisiana with New Orleans was legally part and parcel of the world-empire of Spain : yet, as the donation, as well as the acceptance, was to be kept secret for a time, the King of France continued to act as sovereign of Louisiana. Theoreti- cally the two powers, Spain and England, faced each other, with the Mississippi between them as boundary line; the actual establishment, however, of both powers in their new possessions was as yet a problem. The French Commandants, Noyon de Villiers and St. Ange de Bellerive remained in charge on the Illinois side, whilst on the west bank of the river there was nothing to hold, but the village of Ste. Genevieve and the Poste of Ai'kansas. On the loth of March, 1763, the King of France, announced that he had determined to disband the troops serving in Louisana. Only four companies of infantry were to remain under the command of D 'Abbadie. The Indians were highly incensed when they heard of the treaty of cession, and said, the King of France had no right to dispose of them and their lands to any other sovereign. The French Creoles, were dissatisfied but hopeful. An English convoy of about three hun- dred and fifty souls, officers, soldiers and children coming up the Mississippi to occupy the strategic points of their new possessions, were (109) 110 History of Hit Arvhdiovcsi of SI. Loins harrassed again and again by the Indians, and at last driven back to New Orleans. The official transfer of the formerly French territory east of the .Mississippi was effected on October 10th, 1765. St. Ange de Bellerive acted for France, Captain Thomas Stirling for England. St. Ange and bis thirty French soldiers immediately departed for the village of St. Louis, which lie still regarded as French territory, until the official transfer to Spain should be made. The donation of Louisiana, that is the country west of the Mississippi with New Orleans, was made known by an offical Letter of Louis XV, dated April 1764, more than two years after the cession. In this document the royal heart goes out to the people of Louisiana, who had served him and France so well. Among other things the Letter expresses the hope, that the King of Spain "will be pleased to instruct his Governor, that all ecclesi- astics and religious communities shall continue to perform their functions of curates and missionaries, and to enjoy the rights, privileges and exceptions granted to them, that all the judges of ordinary jurisdiction, together with t lie Superior Council, shall continue to administer justice according to the laws, forms and usages of the colony." 1 All this sounds very sweet and kind ; but it was in this very year, 1764, that the Superior Council, headed by La Freniere and Foucault, struck the blow that crushed the only band of missionaries left in Louisiana. On the other hand, the Spanish government still delayed to take possession of the gift of King Louis. On January 20th, 1768, Aubry, the French Commander in New Orleans wrote: "I am in the most extraordinary position. I command for the King of France and, at the same time, I govern the Colony as if it belonged to the King of Spain. A French Commander is gradually moulding Frenchmen to Spanish domination." 2 The Spanish Governor Ulloa had no military power at his disposal. The spirit of independence was spreading among the French. The Superior Council, that had expelled the Jesuits, now expelled the few Spaniards with Ulloa, the Spanish Governor. It was a bloodless revolution, but a revolution nevertheless, and now Spain roused itself to quick and decisive action. Upon the arrival of the news of the revolution a cabinet council was held in which the Duke of Alba gave this brief and characteristic opinion; "that the King (of Spain) ought to retain Louisiana, on account of the extreme importance of the River Mississippi, being the fixed and settled limit of the English pos- session." 3 Don Alexander O'Reilly, the most distinguished military i Gayarre, "History of Louisiana," vol. II. p. II-'. 2 Gayarre, vol. II, p. 185. "Considering thai the French troops refused to obey the Spanish governor, Aubrey would remain the apparent and nominal chief of the Colony, but would govern according to the dictates of UHoa," i. e. the Spanish governor, p. 167. 3 Gayarre, vol. II, p. 252. Civil Allegiance and Ecclesiastical Authority 111 officer of Spain at the time, was commissioned to take possession of Louisiana, with the significant remark: "Your Excellency knows very well that the loss of great interests is looked upon by Spain with indif- ference, but that it is not so with regard to insults." 4 Don Alexander O'Reilly came, saw, and conquered, not by storm of battle, but by mere show of power. Some among the ringleaders paid the penalty of death for their rebellious acts, among them the deporters of the Jesuit Fathers in 1764. It was in 1769 that Louisiana became finally, but not forever, a Spanish Colony. 5 A census of the population in the Missiissippi Valley, exclusive of the Indians, was one of the first acts of Governor O'Reilly. The sum total of inhabitants, slaves included, was only 13,538. Although the political change thus effected did not immediately bring about a change in the spiritual jurisdiction, it certainly was a step in that direction. The Bishop of Quebec, though now a subject of the King of England, remained Ordinary of Upper and Lower Louisiana, whilst the Superior of the Capuchins at New Orleans, Father Dagobert de Longwi continued to claim his authority as Vicar-General of Quebec. Yet the union of Church and State, which then obtained in Spain and France alike, placed certain obligations upon the State in regard to the temporal support of the Church and its ministers. Naturally, therefore, would the Spanish authorities prefer to deal with bishops and priests of their own nationality, whilst Rome, as a rule, was willing to sanction the change. His Catholic Majesty, as the King of Spain was called, had in the course of time received or assumed a number of exceptional privileges in the matter of appointment and recall of the Clergy, high and low. These so called prerogatives of the crown would certainly be put in use in the new colony of Louisiana, as they were practiced in the other parts of the Spanish realm. But for the first few years nothing was attempted in the matter of placing the colony under Spanish ecclesiastical control, because there was so very little to be controlled, and that little so very hard to reach. The Bishop of Quebec, being in possession, was left in possession, although the leading men of New Orleans and the Capuchin Superior, were already making trouble for their Spiritual Head. After the pacification of the country the juris- diction of Quebec in all Louisiana, lapsed into that of Santiago de Cuba, although the Pope delayed his recognition of the royal edict until 1777. Bishop Briand of Quebec was glad to be relieved of the burden. In April 1767 he wrote to Father Meurin : " As yet I have no news from Xew Orleans. The difficulty of governing from such a distance, or finding persons in whom to confide, the troubles which the Capuchins have always stirred up there, their bad conduct, their disobedience, * Gayarre, vol. II, p. 266. 5 For a life-sketch of Don Alexandre O'Keilly see Gayarre, vol. II, p. 283. 111! History of the Archdiocest of St. Loins their twenty-three years of stubborn resistence to their Ordinary, all these considerations have so disgusted and harrassed me, that I have an extreme repugnance to assume charge of that section, and I assure you, thai 1 would not be sorry if the Spanish government wished it to be dependent on one of their dioceses in America." 6 This much is suffi- cient h plain, that the Bishop of Quebec gave his full consent to the dis- memberment of his diocese by the loyal decree, although he could not con- sider himself altogether relieved of responsibility until Rome approved of the act. Early in June of the year 1772 the Spanish Capuchins, P. Cyrillo de Barcelona, in company with four other Capuchins, arrived in New Orleans, with the commission from the Bishop of Santiago de Cuba, James Joseph Echeverria to investigate the religious conditions in the new Province. By request of Father Cyrillo, Father Dagobert was continued in his office as Superior, and consequently as Vicar-General of the Bishop of Quebec. But Father Cyrillo, as the representative of the Bishop of Santiago, acted independently of Father Dagobert, first as Vicar-General and, from 1781 on, as Bishop of Tricala, and Auxiliary for Louisiana. In 1787 the diocese of Santiago di Cuba was dismembered, all Louisiana and the Floridas being assigned to the new diocese of St. Christopher de Havana. The Bishop of Havana, Joseph de Tres- palacios, retained Bishop Cyrillo as his auxiliary for Louisiana. On April 25th, 1792, another dismemberment occured, and Louisiana and the Floridas were erected into a diocese, the Cathedral of which was fixed in New Orleans. The Bishop of the new diocese, Louis Pehalver y Cardenas, arrived in New Orleans on July 17th, 1795. The official name of the diocese was Louisiana and the Floridas, although its Bishops sometimes assumed the style of Bishop of New Orleans. When on July 20th, 1802, the Louisiana territory was returned to France by Spain and, less than a year later, sold by France to the United States, April 30th, 1803, Bishop Penalver left NeAv Orleans for Guatamala. The western portion of Upper Louisiana, that is the territory of the future diocese of St. Louis, was now under Spanish rule in spiritual as well as temporal matters, and the parishes were provided with priests at the expense of the Spanish government. But, what were the fortunes of its eastern portion that was left in the power of heretical England? What was the condition of religion and public morals in the ancient Catholic settlements of the Illinois Country along the eastern borders of the Mississippi? Dark and threatening were the clouds that had settled down over the former scenes of peace. There was but one priest left in all Upper Louisiana. The devoted son of St. Francis, Father Luke Collet at Fort Chart res, a venerable man, bowed down by the o Alvord and Carter, "The New Regime, 1765-1767," in British Series, vol. II. p. 560. Civil Allegiance and Ecclesiastical Authority 113 weight of many years of patient toil and sorrow in the cause of Christ. The Bishop of Quebec had sent him to the Illinois Missions, and the Frenchman's natural love for the French cause had kept him an exile from Canada, until now. But he and he alone would not forsake his post of honor, though the current of his life was well nigh spent. But who was his bishop after Canada itself was lost to the English? Father Collet surely had no doubts about the matter: the Bishop of Quebec was still his Ordinary. To him he looked for guidance and support. But for a time there was no bishop at Quebec. Bishop Pontbriand had died in June 1760, and the Bishop-Elect, John Oliver Briand, was debarred by English Tyranny from receiving consecration. The Church had no Bishop in the English colonies along the A'lantic seaboard. In fact only two of the thirteen colonies. Maryland and Pennsylvania permitted the exercise of the Catholic religion. The little band of heroic priests of these two liberal colonies acted under the jurisdiction of the Vicar Apostolic of London, who at that time was Bishop Challoner. Canada and all the French territory on the eastern borders of the Mississippi now belonged to England. "In consequence of this increase of British territory." says Burton, "Bishop Challoner had to consider whether under the terms of his faculties, he was or was not responsible for the spiritual well-being of Canada and the other new possessions." 7 Rome did not give a definite answer, but asked for further information. Quebec retained possession. At last, Bishop Briand. in order to bring peace to his distracted people, resigned in favor of Bishop D'Esglis, who was persona grata witli the British authorities. This paved the way for the so-called "Quebec Act," passed by Parliament in 177-1, an Act which gave the Canadians the free exercise of the Catholic religion as under the former French rule. It was this Act of Justice that healed the wound of Canada's being torn from her mother France, and it was the unexpectedness of it that won the Canadian's loyalty and good will for her English rulers. The successive Bishops of Quebec continued to exercise their hereditary right and power on the eastern borders of the Mississippi, in Cahokia, Kaskaskia, Fort Chartres and Vincennes, even after the appointment of Carroll as Prefect Apostolic and Bishop of Baltimore. Bishop Carroll's jurisdiction over the entire territory to the Spanish boundary, the Mississippi River, was not formally established until January 29th, 1791. 8 But previous to that, on October 6th, 1788, Bishop Hubert of Quebec and the Prefect Apostolic at Baltimore, John Carroll, had arranged a modus vivendi, Bishop Hubert wrote: "It is true that the settlements in the country of the Illinois are incontestably in the diocese of Quebec, - Guilday, "Life and Times of John Carroll," p. 148. s Shea, John G. "Life and Times of Most Rev. John Carroll," p. 382. 114 History of tht Archdiocese of St. Loins according to our original grant, and also that the Seminary of Quebec, for that reason, long had the right to nominate a Superior among the Tamarois, a prerogative which the said Seminary resigned in favor of the Bishop of Quebec. Be that as it may, I believe it is prudent for us under the circumstances, to accommodate ourselves to the new order of things, although 1 be not at liberty to assent to the dismemberment of this part of my diocese without the consent of my Coadjutor and of my clergy. Divine Providence having permitted that the Illinois should have fallen into the power of the United States, the spiritual charge of which is confided to your care, I urgently beseech you to continue in the meantime to provide for these missions, as it Avould be difficult for me to supply them myself without, perhaps, giving some offense to the British government." 9 This letter proves among other things that during the British period the spiritual authority in the country east of the Mississippi remained vested in the Bishop of Quebec. 10 9 Letter of Bishop Hubert lo Bishop Carroll in Guilday, "Life and Times of John Carroll," p. 297. i° The ecclesiastical jurisdiction over the Mississippi Valley suffered a number of changes, generally following the changes of political authority. The earliest priests in Canada, Recollets and seculars, derived their jurisdiction from the Arch- bishop of Rouen, in Normandy, but after the appointment of Bishop Laval, all the priests in Canada and New France were dependent on the Bishop of Quebec. The Vicariate Apostolic and, later on, the Diocese of Quebec, included all Canada and Louisiana, that is the territory on both sides of the Mississippi River. This con- dition lasted from October 1st, 1674 until November 3rd, 1762, when the part of Louisiana west of the Mississippi river together with the city and territory of New Orleans was ceded to Spain and in consequence passed under the jurisdiction of Santiago de Cuba. Bishop Hubert, of Quebec, in his Report to Rome in 1792 states: ' ' This latter Province, Louisiana, having passed over to Spanish domination, the Bishop of Quebec has first transferred his jurisdiction to the Bishops of Havana." The correct title of the Spanish diocese was Santiago de Cuba, but as the Bishop 's residence was at Havana, the diocese generally went by that name. Havana, however, became a diocese in its own right in 1787. During the time in which Louisiana was a part of the diocese of Santiago de Cuba, in 1772, Bishop James Joseph de Echevarria sent the Capuchin Father Fray Cyrillo de Barcellona, his auxiliary Bishop, to reside at New Orleans. On April 25th, 1793, by decree of the Sacred Consistorial Congregation, Louisiana and the Floridiis were dis- membered from the See of Havana and erected into a diocese, the Cathedral of which was fixed in New Orleans. As a useful help to a better understanding of the vexed problem of Ecclesiastical jurisdiction in the Mississippi Valley we subjoin a kind of diagram taken from the "Catholic Historical Review," vol. II, p. 351: 1. Territory West of the Mississippi: 1. 1658-1674— Vicariate Apostolic of Canada. 2. 1674-1759— Diocese of Quebec. 3. 1759-1787 — Diocese of Santiago, Cuba and St. Christopher de Havanna. 4. 1787-1825 — Diocese of Louisiana and the Floridas. 2. Territory East of the Mississippi. 1. 1658-1674— Vicariate of Canada. 2. 1674-1784 — Diocese of Quebec. 3. 1784-1789— John Carroll, Prefect Apostolic of the United States. 4. 1789-1808— Diocese of Baltimore. 5. 1808-1834 — Diocese of Bardstown. Chapter 3 RETURN OP FATHER SEBASTIAN MEURIN We have in a former chapter narrated Father Watrin's account of the Jesuit exodus from Kaskaskia to New Orleans and their treatment there. The Capuchins received them kindly, the Superior Council with haughty arrogance. Father Meurin could not forget the tears and praj'ers of his neophytes that he would stay with them, or if he had to leave, to come back to them as soon as he could. He petitioned the Superior Council for leave to return to the Illinois, not as a Jesuit, but as a secular priest and missioner. To his own surprise the Council acceded to his request. Father Meurin then begged to be allowed to start on the upward voyage in January ; the Council delayed its permis- sion until the end of February. "This was a brave resolution," says Father Watrin in praise of Father Meurin, after the sale of all the property of the Jesuits, he could not count upon any fund for his subsistence, the French were under no obligation to him, and the savages have more need of receiving than means for giving; further- more, the health of this Father was very poor, as it had always been during the twenty-one years which he had spent in Louisiana. But he knew in what danger the Illinois neophytes were of soon forgetting religion, if they remained long without missionaries; he therefore counted as nothing all the other inconveniences, provided he could resume the duties of his mission. His request was granted and a promise was given to him that a pension of six hundred livres would be asked for him at the court." 1 Father Meurin was informed by the Council that the diocese of Quebec no longer included Louisiana. In order to obtain permission to return to the Illinois country he was obliged to sign a document, that he would recognize no other ecclesiastical superior than the Superior of the Capuchins at New Orleans, and that he would take up his residence in Ste. Genevieve. Of course, this might be true; Father Meurin had no means to test the truth of the assertion. But as to his faculties, he had no misgivings. If the Illinois country was still under the Bishop of Quebec, as he believed, he was still entitled to all the rights he enjoyed before from Quebec. If Quebec's power had lapsed, then the Superior of the Capuchins gave valid faculties. So he signed the document, renouncing his allegiance to Quebec only on condition that the change of jurisdiction was a fact. Alvord and Carter, "The Critical Period, 1763-1765," p. 118. (115) IK! History of tlu Arckdiocest of St. Louis "About this time" as Father Metzer, S. J. shows in his article on Sebastian Louis Meurin, 2 "he made application at Rome for very extensive powers which were "ranted the following year." On September 4, 17(i.">, tin* Holy Office decreed thai His Holiness should be asked to grant the power of dispensing- in cases of marriage which involved "disparitas cultus," to Father Meurin, who had petitioned for this power. That same day the Holy Father "granted for a triennium from the date of receipt, this extraordinary faculty, 'dispensandi super disparitate cultus in matrimoniorum celebr-atione,' for the relief of a mission almost destitute of every aid, and for the spiritual comfort of a Christian flock, so far remote by sea and land." 3 In this way Father Meurin "received from the Holy See for his country of the Illinois extraordinary faculties, such as had never been granted to any 'bishops, vicars apostolic or missionaries in America.' " 4 Leaving New Orleans in the middle of February, 1764, the truly Apostolic man stopped over at the Post of Arkansas on March 1, 1764, and baptized thirteen persons, as "the archives of the Station of Arcansa" attest. He must have arrived at Ste. Genevieve towards the end of May, as the journey up-stream usually required ninety days at least. But Ste. Genevieve was only one of the missionary's cares. There was Kaskaskia with its French and Indian Catholics, there was Cahokia, even now a thriving commercial town, and there was St. Louis, the newly founded village on the western bank of the river. Calls there came for spiritual assistance from Vincennes on the Wabash, and from isolated mining camps to the west of Ste. Genevieve. From regions utterly unknown, Catholics would come to Father Meurin in Ste. Genevieve, as we learn from his entry of a burial: "I know neither the family, nor the parish, nor where or when he was born." "The first entry, in the Ste. Genevieve parish records, is a baptism conferred May 13, 1764, on the son of Louis and Janette, negro slaves of Jean Baptiste Beauvais of Kaskaskia, the child was christened Lotus. The first marriage of which Meurin makes record under date of October 30th, 1764, is a very interesting case, the parties being Mark Constan- tinot of Canada, and Susan Henn, of German parentage, who had settled in Pennsylvania. As both had been carried into slavery by the Shawnee Indians some five years previous, they contracted a natural marriage, which was blessed with two daughters. Availing themselves of a favorable, opportunity for escape, they fled from captivity and on - Cf. "Illinois Catholic Historical Review," vols. Ill and IV. Father Metzger 'a exhaustive study of Father Meurin 's life and times deserves hearty recognition. This and the following chapter are greatly indebted to it. 3 Hughes, Thomas, S. J., "The History of the Society of Jesus in North America," Text Vol. II, p. 589, quoted by Metzger, 1. c. ■* Hughes, op. cit. p. 598. Return of Father Sebastian Meurin 117 October 30th presented themselves to Father Meurin to have him pro- nounce the church's blessing on their union. 5 It is of interest to note that Father Meurin styles himself "pretre missionaire, " or "cure aux Illinois," or finally "cure aux pays des Illinois," while he designates the church in Ste. Genevieve as " L'Eglise de Saint Joachim aux Illinois,'' or, "en la paroisse de St. Joachim de Ste. Genevieve' and finally "a Ste. Genevieve." The years 1766 and 1767 mark the period of his greatest activity in Ste. Genevieve as is evidenced by the parish records, for in 1766 he baptized thirty-one persons and married five couples, while in 1767 he baptized twenty-eight persons and married eight parties. A comparative study of his duties and activities at Sainte Genevieve and at Kaskaskia as recorded in the official documents of both places is not without interest. The Parish records both of Baptisms and Marriages show a constant annual increase for Ste. Genevieve and a proportionate decrease for Kas- kaskia. The newer town was in the ascendant, the older town in rapid de- cline. ' ' The last entry for this period in Father Meurin 's hand is the bap- tism on October 22, 1768, after which Father Gibault cared for the spirit- ual wants of the people and Meurin kept away from Ste. Genevieve, save on two occasions." On the 26th day of August 1767 Father Meurin received from Bishop Briand the appointment as Vicar-General for the Illinois country. This honor and burden came in consequence of a letter that the lone missionary in the wilderness had sent to the newly-consecrated Bishop of Quebec, Briand, in which the spiritual condition of his vast field of labor was graphically described. The fears and hopes of Father Meurin struck a responsive chord in the heart of the Bishop who had experienced in his own person the malice and hatred of the world. We here give the main parts of Father Meurin 's letter to Bishop Briand : "The country of the Illinois is nothing more than six villages of about fifty to eighty fires each, not including the slaves whose number is sufficiently great. Each of these villages on account of the distance between them and their situation, demands a priest; namely, in the English territory, the Parish of the Immaculate Conception at Kaskaskia, that of St. Joseph at Prairie du Rocher, and the Parish of the Holy Fami- ly. In the French or Spanish territory beyond the river are situated the villages of Ste. Genevieve with the title of St. Joachim on which are dependent the Salines and the Mines; and thirty leagues above is the new village called St. Louis which has been formed out of the ruins of St. Philippe and Fort de Chartres. These two villages are as large as the first in inhabintants or slaves, red or black. "St. Joachim or St. Genevieve is the place of my residence, as it was ordained by the conditions of my return to the country. It is Rozicr's "History of the Early Settlement of the Mississippi Valley," p. 118. 118 History of the Archdiocese, of St. Louis from there that I come every springtime and go through the other villages for Easter. I return thither again in the autumn and every time that I am called for the sick. This is all my infirmities and my means can permit me. Still this is disagreeable and prejudicial to the people of Ste. Geneieve who alone nourish and support me ; and they complain of it. With only these visits the people, and especially the children and slaves, are lacking sufficient instruction ; and since they are deprived of the pastoral vigilance they are insensibly losing piety and abandoning themselves to vices. There are here still many families in which religion rules and who fear with reason that it will become extinct with them. They join in prayer with me that you have pity on their children and send them at least two or three priests, if your Bighness cannot send the four or five that are needed. One of these should have the title Grand Vicar of your Highness. I try to maintain in my absence the use of the offices and prayers to assist in the sancti- fication of Sundays and saints' days. There are already a number who no longer attend church or who seem to come there only to show their lack of respect for it. Some intractable and insolent people say, haughtily enough, that I have no title, and that I am not their Pastor, that I have no right to give them advice, and that they are not obliged to listen to me. They would not have dared to speak this in the time of M. Stirling 6 and Farmer, 7 commandants, from whom I had every protection. Under the command of these two first no person dared to attempt the least indecency." ' ' The church of Ste. Anne has, for almost a year, been without roof, doors and windows, and with walls broken or badly closed, because the church wardens have changed their home and village without inform- ing me or having others elected; and they left the keys to the beadle who withdrew also and left them with an inhabitant, and thus they pass from one to another. When finally I was informed, I went there and demanded and obtained from the English commandant his consent to the removal of the furniture of the church of Ste. Anne to the chapel of St. Joseph at Prairie du Rocher. I myself carried the sacred vessels, accompanied by the one to whom the keys had been given. There was petition upon petition from the two single inhabitants who remained there and assured the commandant that the church and furniture be- longed to them personally. An order was given me to bring back the sacred vessels and to leave them all in the said church of Ste. Anne. I 6 Captain Thomas Stirling- came to America in 1758. As British Commissioner he accepted the cession of the Illinois country in March 1765, at Fort Chartres and became commandant of the colony. i Major Robert Farmar sm- sded Stirling as Commandant on December 2, 1765, to be superseded by Lt. Col. John Reed, in the summer of 1766. Father Meurin was on good terms with Stirling and Farmar but not with Reed. Return of Father Sebastian Meurin 119 did not believe it my duty to go there. I wrote in the form of a petition drawn up in the name of your chapter, since I did not know that it should be done in the name of Your Highness ; I Avas obliged to stand a suit; my adversaries insisted upon I know not what yet; I lost your suit ; I wrote again ; English judges were named, and the process will be ended when it shall please God and Your Highness. The church is getting always in a worse condition; open on every side, it has served, I am told, as a den for beasts during winter. The furniture and orna- ments are still there and I know not in what state. I await your orders and the repentance of the opponents. The sacred vessels are still at Prairie du Rocher. "Post Vincennes on the Wabash, among the Miami Piankashaw, is as large as our best villages here and has still greater need of a mission- ary. Disorder has always been great there, but it has increased in the last three years. Some come here to be married or to make their Easter duty. The majority do not wish to, nor can they do it. The guardian of the church there publishes the banns for three Sundays ; to those who wish to come here he gives a certificate of publication without opposi- tion, which I myself republish before marrying them. Those \vho do not wish to come declare in a loud voice in their church their mutual consent. Can such a marriage be permitted ? "Before I returned to the Illinois, I was assured at New Orleans that Louisiana was not and would no longer be in the diocese of Quebec. I was made to promise and sign that I would no longer recognize any other ecclesiastical superior than the Reverend Father Superior of the Capu- chins, who alone had and would have all jurisdiction, that on the first occasion they would give me a certificate of it if I required. It is on this condition that I signed, adding that when it should please his Holiness to give the jurisdiction to the highest chief of the Negroes, I should be submissive to him as to one meriting more than Bishops. Consequently, as my signature was given upon the promise of a confirmation Avhich has not yet come, I am bound no longer with any relations with Rome or with Quebec. That is what has hindered me up to the present from writing to the Grand Vicars of the diocese, especially since I have not found a safe opportunity by land as I have today by MM. Despins and Beauvais, who are going to Montreal, and should return this next autumn. They have volunteered to bring, at their own expense, the missionaries you appoint for this place, and the parishioners have promised to reim- burse them. The great need of missionaries for this country has forced me to knock at all doors in order to obtain some While I am awaiting the effects of Your pastoral charity, I shall continue to make use of the former powers which I received from M. Mercier, twenty-five years ago, which have been continued by MM. Laurent and Forget, the latter of whom verbally left me at his departure all that he had 120 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis received. The Grand Vicar whom you will send to us will limit them as hi' shall judge fit tint: and will find me as did his predecessor, with all zeal and possible respect, my lord, Your Bighness, very humble and very obedienl servant, Sebastian Louis Meurin, missionary priest." 8 It was a saddening view that the missionary presented to his Bishop: l>m it was strictly in accordance with the facts. Even the British authorities, though indifferent to the Catholic religion, saw the necessity of providing for the spiritual wants of their French subjects. Captain Thomas Stirling wrote to General Gage: "The inhabitants complain very much for want of Priests, there is but one now remains, the rest either having died or gone away, and he (Meurin) stays on the other side. He was formerly a Jesuit and would have been sent away likewise, if the Kaskaskia Indians, to whom he was priest, had not insisted upon his staying, winch the French allowed him to do upon his renouncing -lesuitism and turning Sulpician. This priest might be of great use to us, if he was brought over to this side, which I make no doubt might be effectuated, provided his former appointments were allowed him, which was 600 livres pr. annum from the King, as Priest to the Indians." 11 father Meurin renewed his petition, before receiving an answer to his first letter: "I am sixty-one years old, I can no longer supply the spiritual needs of this country, where the most robust man could not serve long, especially as it is divided by a very rapid and dangerous river. Pour priests are accessary; if you can give only one, he should be appointed for Kaskaskia. At this moment I am called on to go to a man who is dangerously ill at Ste. Genevieve, thirty leagues from Cahokia, where T have been only three days. I am forced to leave undone more than three-fourths of the work to be done here. 1 beg you, my Lord, to have pity on this pari of your flock and on me." 10 Whilst the weary missionary was living in a fond delusion of hope thai the Bishop would relieve him of a part of his burden, the Bishop only burdened him with a new and dangerous honor. His words were: "I send you letters of appointment as Grand Vicar in the most extended terms; you will use them wherever you may chance to be, throughout this part of my diocese whose limits are immense and unknown even to myself; at least it is certain that they extend to all lands which the French have possessed in North America." 11 After some remarks about the Capuchins and Orsulines in New Orleans His Grace continues: "If you think that the government v Alvord and Carter, "The New Regime," pp. 522-529. Printed in Carayon, " Bfinissi'iin'iit des Jesuites," p. 58. ! » Alvord and Carter, op. cit. p. 124. That Meurin had turned Sulpician is a mistake of SI irling \s. io Alvord and Carter, op. eit. p. 568-569. " Alvord and Carter, op. eit. p. 560. Return of Father Sebastian Meurin 121 authorizes and supports you, you could use your powers even in New Orleans, and exercise there your authority over the whole secular and regular clergy, which may be there, and nominate for the sisters the confessor whom they wish, and give limited letters as Grand Vicar to one of the Capuchins whom you judge most worthy." 12 It was indeed a dizzy height to winch Briand had raised Meurin. The appointment only filled the gentle missionary with consternation instead of joy and pride. With sincere gratitude for the Bishop's very kind mark of con- fidence, Father Meurin expresses his deep solicitude in regard to possible effects of his appointment : "My letters of last spring must have omitted to inform you of my age, and of my weakness of body and mind. I retain only a small portion of weak judgment, have no memory, and possess still less firmness. I need a guide both for the soul and for the body; for my eyes, my ears, and my legs likewise are very feeble. I am no longer good for anything but to be laid in the ground. I trust, Monsigneur, that you will be good enough to forgive me for having neither carried nor sent your graces and favors to New Orleans, accord- ing to your letters and instructions, — of which I have thought proper to let even our dear Ursulines remain ignorant, lest they might have occasion for sorrow, which they do not deserve." 13 As to the consequences touching himself, Father Meurin says: "How would I have been received there after having stated over my own signature (in order to obtain permission to return to the Illinois) that I would always act as Vicar of the Reverend Capuchin Fathers, — subject to their visits, their reprimands, and corrections, and to their jurisdiction, etc., which was to be the only one throughout the Mississippi. As soon as they, the Spanish authorities heard, through the voyageurs, that you honored me with the appointment as Vicar-General, a warrant of proscription was issued against me ; and it would have been executed had I not, on being warned thereof by a friend in authority, escaped from it by with- drawing to English territory. There, on at once taking the oath of allegiance as a former resident, I secured myself against the Spanish prosecutions, — which declare that I am a criminal, because I have re- ceived jurisdiction from Quebec, which is so opposed to the intentions and interests of Spain." 14 Father Meurin, having taken up his residence on British soil, had occasion to carry out the Bishop's instructions in regard to the mission property at Cahokia. This property as we have seen, was sold by Father Forget Duverger, the last representative of the Seminary of the Priests of the Foreign Mission, to one Sieur Lagrange, and by him conveyed to 12 Alvord and Carter, op. cit. p. 561. « "Jesuit Relations," vol. 71, p. 385 note. 14 "Jesuit Relations," vol. 71, passin. 122 History of tin Archdioces( of St. Louis Sieur Joutard. The latter was now bargaining to sell it to an English- man. As the property was originally granted to the Missionary Society of Quebec Seminary, and as Father Forget had received no power of sale from the Quebec Seminary, the various sales were void. Hence Father Meurin protested against the proposed action of Sieur Joutard as illegal. To the Bishop he writes: "About a month ago, having learnt that Sieur Joutard was bargaining to resell it to an Englishman, I went to oppose the sale on behalf of the Gentlemen of your Seminary, who claim this property as still belonging to them, through its having been sold, without their power of attorney and without their knowledge by the person who was but the steward thereof. I also undertook to support, by the use of your name, Monseigneur, my contention for the preservation of all property belonging to the churches for their main- tenance and that of the missionaries whom You deign to employ. Mr. Forbes, the commandant, (there is no civil government here as yet), asked me for the letters containing my commission. I showed him Your letters, and those of Monsieur the Superior. As regards the letters conferring the appointment of Vicar-General, he replied, that, inasmuch as Monsieur de Gage had given no instructions respecting the episcopacy and the office of Vicar-General, he could not take cognizance of them ; and that this seemed purely a scheme on Your part and mine. He there- fore expressly forbade me to use the letters, or to assume the title of Vicar-General in any letter, or deed, or in public, until he should receive an answer from his General regarding both your jurisdiction in the country and the Cahokia property. He promised me, however, that the latter should not be offered for sale until then. Sieur Joutard goes to Canada, and thence to New York or London, to obtain release from the possession of the said estate. The land at Fort Chartres is also, for the same reason, in danger of being carried away by the river. I have caused to be removed and conveyed to la Prairie du Rocher the remains of Monsieur Gagnon and Reverend Father Luc, (Luke) a Recollet, both worthy missionaries This is all I can do." "There is also in this village of the Kaskaskias, the property of the Jesuits which was unjustly seized, confiscated and sold by the French government after the cession of the country to England. If your Lordship or your missionaries in Canada wish to revindicate it, as for myself I ask nothing. I am too old. But I would always be grieved to see the chapel and cemetery profaned, being now used as a garden and store- house by the English, who rent them from Sieur Jean Baptiste Beauvais — who, under the decree of confiscation and the contract of sale and purchase of the property, was obliged to demolish the chapel and leave its site and that of the cemetery uncultivated under the debris. He says that the subdelegate, the executor of the decree, has since sold the property to him. By what right? The presses used for the vestments Return of Father Sebastian Meurin 123 and sacred vessels are now used in his apartments, as well as the altar- cruets and the floor." "During the four A'ears while I have ministered to these English parishes, I have received no tithes therefrom ; I have received naught but what was given me out of charity by some, and the fees for masses. I have always exhorted them to pay the tithes to the fabrique, for the support of the churches and of the missionary, when one comes. They, I mean the rich ones, have always claimed that they owe nothing when there is no resident pastor." 15 In 1768 Father Meurin made the first attempt on British Territory to hold the Corpus Christi Procession. At the request of the habitants, he asked the commandants to allow the militia to turn out under arms, as is the custom among the Roman Catholics, to escort the Blessed Sacrament. This they refused. The weather was not settled ; the Father was indisposed and fatigued, through having had a procession very early on the other side, at Ste. Genevieve. In Kaskaskia he had one only in the Church, and likewise on the day of the octave. is "Jesuit Relations," vol. 71, pp. 33-34. ( Shapter 4. MEURINAND GIBAULT At last the prayers and importunities of Father Meurin are begin- ning to bring results, nol indeed in the measure of his expectations, but after all. in a very effieient way. Father Pierre Gibault arrives from Quebec at Kaskaskia towards the end of September 1768, in the quality of Vicar General of the Illinois Country, with the- entire territory as his missionary field. lie is a native of Montreal, born April 7th, 1737. lie made his studies at the expense of the Quebec Seminary, and was destined for the Illinois missions from the beginning. The Bishop de- sired him to reside at Cahokia, but Father Meurin gladly left him in charge of Kaskaskia, as the more central and otherwise more desirable location. Father Gibault was in the prime of manhood, full of fiery energy, so that Father Meurin expressed the fear that, being so full of zeal, he would not last long. He had done wonderful things at Mack- inac during his short stay at that old .Jesuit foundation. Bishop Briand took occasion to show T his high regard for the young man. Only one or two mistakes the missionary had made which added a stroke of weak- ness to the otherwise ideal picture. "I am a little displeased with him," writes the Bishop, "for having taken his mother with him without letting me know beforehand. Such conduct scarcely becomes a missionary, who seeks, and should seek, God alone. It was for this that I ordained him. I would not have sent him on so distant a mission without his consent. If he had told me that he must of necessity have his mother with him, I would most probably not have assigned him to that good work but would have put him in charge of a parish in this colony. It is my firm conviction that if a priest is to do justice to his office and fulfill his ministry worthily in your part of the country he cannot have his parents with him nor be encumbered by a large household. In other respects Father Gibault seems to be possessed of the qualities and disposition nec- essary for success." 1 The other mistake was his assisting at the marriage of a Frenchman with an Indian woman, a practice that was rather com- mon in the Illinois, but forbidden in Canada. These things may appear insignificant, but in a man of Gibault 's character and position they were regarded as rather serious. A more serious matter in the estima- i Cannon, "Banissi menl iles Jesuites de la Louisiana," is the best collection of Father Meurin's correspondence with the Bishop of Quebec. The present ex- trad is found <>n p. 83. Cf. Metzger, "Sebastian Louis Meurin/' in "Illinois Cath- olic Eistorical Review," vol. I V, p. 46. (124) ^e=^2w ri. Meurin and Gibault 125 tion of Father Meurin was the young missionary's illness. "Father Gibault has been ill practically ever since his arrival" writes Father Meurin, "At first he suffered from a severe fever and was in danger; of late a slight but persistent fever saps his strength. However, his courage buoys him up and enables him to perform his chief duties in the parish of the Immaculate Conception of the Kaskaskias. He thought it best to make Kaskaskia his permanent residence, and go from time to time to the Spanish colony of Ste. Genevieve, from which I, as a Jesuit, was banished. Such was his good fortune that he succeeded in getting almost all the people in these two parishes to perform their Easter duty, which most of them had neglected for years."- But Father Gibault 's health improved from day to day, and the labors and priva- tions of the ministry only served to harden him against the evil influ- ences of exposure to bad weather, extended trips through forests and over mountains, the crossing of rivers and torrents. Indeed the Lord, as Father Meurin prayed, renewed His ancient miracles in his behalf. "There remained only the danger of eventual discouragement. For this country is in such a wretched condition that long before we have com- pleted our work in one place the stations where we worked earlier have returned to their original condition, if not indeed to a worse condition, since we cannot possibly give enough lime to any locality to root out evil practices and accustom the people to righteous living." 3 Father Gibault 's work was clearly marked out for him by Father Meurin : "I never miss an opportunity to explain to him that the inhabitants of St. Louis, of Cahokia, of Prairie du Rocher, Ste. Genevieve and Vincennes are as much his parishioners as the people of Kaskaskia, to whom he seems inclined to confine himself. Thus the whole country would become one great parish, until there were priests in all the villages." 4 Father Gibault soon realized the full extent of bis duty. But his first and most pressing obligation was to the people of Kaskaskia. Meanwhile Father Meurin took up his work at Cahokia, across the river from St^ Louis, as he informs Bishop Briand in 1768: "up to the present I have had charge of the parish of the Holy Family among the Cahokias or Tamarois, from the time I came here in autumn till Christmas, from the end of January till Easter, and then I stayed here till the Ascension. I have spent the last twelve days here, ministering likewise to the inhabitants of Saint Louis, the principal village of the Spanish colony, from which I was banished. I baptise and marry them, hear their confessions and give them Communion, etc. ; I only go to 2 Carayon, op. cit. p. 84, Englished in Metzger's article, "Louisiana Cath- olic Historical Review," vol. IV, p. 47. 3 Carayon, op. cit. p. 84, Metzger, 1. c, p. 47. * Carayon, op. cit. Metzger, 1. c, p. 48. 126 History of lln Archdiocese of St. Louis Saint Louis in case of sickness and then only a1 night and incognito. Prom here I shall go to Prairie du Rocher, a little village of twenty people, including two who are at Port Chartres, one league from here, and four men living at Saint Philip at a distance <>f three leagues. I retired to Prairie du Rocher so that new missionaries might have a better field for the exercise of their zeal and talent and might find it easier to secure a livelihood. As we hoped for at least two missionaries, this little parish, which is part of Sainte Anne at Port Chartres, invited me to spend the rest of my days here, promising to build me a parish house and to furnish everything I needed for the rest of my life, no matter what infirmities might come upon me. Because of this I promised not to abandon them unless I were absolutely forced to do so, stipulating, how- ever, that I reserved the right to go to the aid of the other villages so long as I could do so and they needed my ministrations. I likewise promised to bequeath to their church everything 1 had received from them or from any other source, providing no other Jesuits returned to this country. These people furnished me with a servant, and a horse and carriage for my journeys, no doubt hoping thus to keep me alive the longer. May God reward them for their kindness. There is nothing I could reasonably desire ; I am in good health and I am unburdened by temporal care. Is this not too much, Monseigneur, for a poor reli- gious, who has been banished, condemned to death, and escaped several times from the scaffold, or at least from the mines ? But let us not de- clare the battle won — all of these evils may return. On one occasion when I was perhaps a trifle too enthusiastic in my defense of the Gentlemen of your seminary in the presence of the English who came in the King's name to take possession of the house, ground, etc., of the mission among the Tamarois, Mr. Morgan, President of Justice, told me that I should not forget that I had been banished by the Spanish, and that my posi- tion among the English was precarious. Nevertheless, I am still here, living now, as I formerly did, in the mission house, and taking Father Gibault's place." 5 And so they labored in unison for the glory of God and the peace to men of good will, Meurin, the last representative of the old order, Gibault, the high minded herald of the new, both rejoicing alike if the work was done, whether it was done by the one or the other, whether the glory of doing it redounded to the old or the young. They both served a Master that leaves no one go without his reward. One more severe trial awaited the lonely Jesuit in his seclusion at Prairie du Rocher. The suppression of the Society of Jesus by Pope 5 Carayon, op. cit. Metzger, 1. c, p. 47-48. Meurin and Gibault 127 Clement XIV in 1774. 6 Heretofore the persecution of the Jesuits had been conducted by Kings and parliaments and Superior Councils, who absolutely lacked jurisdiction. But now the Pope had spoken, though reluctantly, and all was over, as men thought. Heretofore the faith- ful son of St. Ignatius "did not consider it necessary to change any- thing whatsoever, either in my religious habit, or in the breviary, Masses, and Feasts, proper to or granted to the Society of Jesus." 7 But now, he asks to be received as a member of the diocesan clergy of Quebec and then in the beautiful spirit of humility he adds: "I shall consider my- self very happy, if, in the short time I have still to live, I am able to repair the acts of cowardice and negligence of which I have been guilty during the past thirty-three years. If you will be so kind as to adopt me, I am convinced that you will forgive me and will ask mercy for me." 8 Father Meurin was the very soul of humility and divine charity. His last words recorded for us were words of praise bestowed upon his people of the Illinois and the Seminary priests whom he had known in the long ago. Let them be this epitaph: "The people of this country are not any worse than those of Canada. They are even more good than bad. This is sometimes my only consolation, as it was the consolation of Fathers Thaumer, Mercier, Gagnon and Laurens, all very worthy priests of this diocese, whose memory is still in benediction here." 9 There are many writers of note, who have placed on record the remarkable career of Father Pierre Gibault, as missionary and pastor of souls, as the Grand Vicar for many years of the Bishops of Quebec, and as a public bene- factor and patriot. 10 In the wide compass of a diocesan history strange and memorable events of such a career cannot be given in detail. An adequate history of Father Gibault and his Times is still a desideratum. We must confine ourselves to a brief conspectus. And first as to his parochial labors and successes in Kaskaskia. At the time of Father Gibault 's arrival in Kaskaskia the old town had become rejuvenated though not in the spirit of religion. It con- tained a population of over fifteen hundred souls, almost all Catholics of some sort. The women were still true to the Church of their childhood, and faithful to the marriage bond. But the love of pleasure and gayety had made sad inroads upon their religious fervor. The old patriarchal life had given place to fashion and folly. As for the men, Father 6 "Life of Pope Clement XIV," from the French of M. Caraecioli, London, 1776, Appendix, pp. 35-84. Also, "American Catholic Quarterly Eeview," XII, 699. 7 Carayon, op. cit. p. 97. Metzger, vol. IV, p. 54. 8 Carayon, ibidem. 9 Letter of May 23, 1776. Metzger, p. 55. io Cf. Thompson, Jos., "Illinois' First Citizen Pierre Gibault," in "Illinois Catholic Historical Eeview," vols. IV, V, VIII. 128 History of lh< Archdiocest of si. Louis Oibault could not find ten who had made their Easter duty for the last four or five years. Father Meurin's teachings had found but stony ground in frivolous Kaskaskia. But the young missionary from Canada started a vigorous attack upon ignorance and vice. In his letter to Bishop Briand, February 15, 1769, he writes: "I have public prayers every evening inwards sundown, catechism four times a week, three times for the whites, and once for the blacks or slaves. As often as possible I preach on such matters as I think most useful for the instruction of my hearers. In a word, 1 employ my talents for the glory of God, for my own sanctification and for that of my neighbor as much, it seems to me, as I ought to do. I trust that our Lord will consider more what I wish to do and the intention with which I do it. than what I ac- complish. ' ,11 On June 15th, of the same year the young pastor had the satisfac- tion of being able to write .... "There are only seven or eight persons in my village who did not receive their Paschal Communion, something that, according to the oldest inhabitant had never been known before .... My tithes amount to from two to three hundred bushels of wheat and four or five hundred bushels of maize or Indian corn, and perquisites." 12 But this was only a beginning although an excellent one : he had gained the good will and the confidence of his parishioners composed of French Creoles, Canadians, the Indians of the Mission and the soldiers of a batallion of the Eighteenth Royal Irish Regiment. 13 Concerning Ste. Genevieve, the appointed residence of Father Meu- rin, Father Gibault writes soon after his arrival in the Illinois country : ' ' I have always attended Ste. Genevieve, which is two leagues from my parish, on the other side of the Mississippi, and which, consequently, belongs to the Spaniards. I easily secured the permission to do so from the English governor ; and the Spanish Commandant, being very devout, would wish me to have it forever, etc. Father Meurin has no permis- sion to go there. The comprehensive title of Vicar General made them banish him from Ste Genevieve, where he would have stayed as a simple missionary; but a Jesuil with so much power in Spain became an object of suspicion. I do not cross over to the other side except for marriages and baptisms and to attend the sick." 14 After restoring order, harmony and spiritual life in all the mis- sions in the vicinity of his residence at Kaskaskia, Father Gibault ex- tended his labors to more distant fields. In the winter of 1769-70 he set out for Vincennes, although the route he must travel was Hirough a ii Thompson, op. cit., vol. IV, p. 200. 12 Thompson, op. cit., vol. IV, p. 201. is The Royal [rish Regiment was stationed at Fort Chartres. 14 Thompson, op. 'it., vol. IV, p. 199. Meurin and Gibault 129 country filled with hostile and savage Indians on the war path, who had already killed many people. .Similar conditions obtained at this Post, as he had found at Kaskaskia. Twenty years of deprivation of religious ministration had introduced libertinage and irreligion. "Nevertheless," as the missionary says, "when he arrived everybody came in a crowd to meet him on the banks of the Wabash. Some threw themselves upon their knees and were quite unable to speak ; others spoke only by their sobs; some cried out, 'Father, save us, we are nearly in hell'; others said : 'God has not utterly abandoned us, for it is He who has sent you to us to make us do penance for our sins ' ; and others again exclaimed: 'Ah, Sir, why did you not come a month ago, then my poor wife, my dear father, my loved mother, my poor child would not have died without the sacraments.' " 15 Father Gibault was deeply touched by these manifestations of good will. Of his successes dur- ing the two months of his stay he made mention to his Bishop : "I have rebuilt the church at this post. It will be of wood but well built and very strong ; there are a goodly sized presbytery, a fine orchard, a garden and a good farm (terre) for the benefit of the pastor who would live elegantly. There are only eighty inhabitants who farm, but there are many people of all trades, numbers of young men who are daily establish- ing themselves here ; in all there are about seven or eight hundred persons who are desirous of having a priest." 10 To make his joy complete an English family at the Post, all of whose members were Presbyterians, asked to be received into the Church. During Father Gibault 's absence from Kaskaskia Father Meurin wax kept busy as he imforms the Bishop with all the missions, as far as Cahokia, his own residence being in Prairie du Rocher. Sometime after Father Gibault 's return from Vin- cennes his mother came to Kaskaskia to make a home for her son, and his domestic happiness took away from his mission the character of a place of exile. The sister who accompanied her to the Illinois country had not been there long before she was married. Both had remained behind for a time at Mackinac until a home was prepared for them at Kaskaskia. In allusion to Bishop Briand's reproach, the truehearted son wrote: "i could not send away my dear mother who came to me at Montreal say- ing that she would go to the ends of the earth (with me) rather than be left in her old age at the mercy of any and everybody." 17 In regard to Father Meurin he says : "I consider myself nearly alone, for the Rever- end Father Meurin has been unable to leave his house since last autumn, partly because of his age which has broken him down, partly because of several dangerous falls that he had on bad roads to which the weight is Thompson, op. cit., vol. IV, p. 202-203. io Thompson, op. cit., vol. IV, p. 203. 17 Thompson, op. cit., vol. IV, p. 203. Vol. I— 5 130 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis of his body and the weakness of his limbs made him liable." Two more missionaries arc si ill needed, one for the Tainarois. twenty leagues from here; the other for Post Vincennes. eighty leagues from here. Dis- orders are many there .... This portion of your flock is terribly exposed to wolves, especially at Post Vincennes where there is a con- siderable number of people who are much better able to support a priest than at the place where I am. And yet I find myself very happily fixed as to temporal affairs." 18 The missionary on the spot is getting importunate : the bishop far away does not respond. So the life of weariness and fret must go on. Father Gibault bears his cross bravely, without repining. The Registers of Michilimackinac, of the Sault of St. Mary, St. Joseph's on Lake Michi- gan. Detroit, Cahokia, St. Louis, St. Genevieve, Kaskaskia, Vincennes and Peoria, show how vast an extent of territory he traversed during his missionary career; and his letters furnish us with interesting details regarding his ministry. Mostly he went about from place to place on foot or horseback or in a cart, bearing with him the utensils of his sacred ministry; some- times a canoe was provided by a friend or chance companion of a voyage. At first he carried a belt with pistol and knife, as a protection against wild animals or a warning to marauders. But later he discarded the pistol as being more dangerous to himself than to any possible enemy. Facing danger at almost every step, braving hardships such as are un- known today in all but the most, savage countries, bearing his burden alone with God, ever ready for the call of duty, Father Gibault was also doomed to taste the bitterness of obloquy and defamation. It seems to be the fate of all the great and good. But how nobly, how convinc- ingly does Father Gibault repel the impudent accusation in a letter to his Bishop: "How can I, in all the pains and hardships I have under- gone in my different journeys, winter and summer, to points the most separated, attending so many villages, so distant from each other, in all weathers, night and day, snow or rain, windstorm or fog on the Mississippi, so that I never slept four nights in a year in my own bed, never hesitating to start at a moment's notice, whether sick or well; how, I ask, can a priest who sacrifices himself in this way with no other view than God's glory, and the salvation of his neighbor, with no pecuniary reward, almost always ill-fed, unable almost to attend to both spiritual and temporal ; how 7 I again ask, can you know that such a priest, zealous to fulfill the duties of his holy ministry, careful to watch over his flock, to found them in the most important tenets of religion, to instruct the young unceasingly and untiringly, not only in is Thompson, op. cit., vol. IV, p. 202. Meurin and Gibault 131 Christian doctrine but in reading and writing; how can you know that he is one who gives or has given scandal to his people. ' ' 19 Father Gibault visited Canada in 1775. On his way he made a second visit to Vincennes. Returning in September he was detained at Mackinac by bad weather until the third of December. After retrac- ing his course to Detroit, he wrote the Bishop : ' ' The suffering I have undergone between Michilimackinac and this place has so deadened my faculties that I only half feel my chagrin at being unable to proceed to the Illinois." 20 Yet he did return, but how early in the year we do not know. Only this we know that his missionary life was continued with all the energy of his soul. On February 23, 1777 his companion in the vast mission, Father Sebastian Louis Meurin, Indian Missionary, Vicar General and Pastor of St. Joseph Church, Prairie du Rocher, entered into life eternal. On February 27 or 29 Father Gibault buried his remains in the Church on the gospel side of the altar, from which they were removed in August 1849 to the beautiful Cemetery of St. Stanislaus Novitiate, Florissant, Missouri. 21 Father Gibault was now left alone the only priest in the wide domain of the Illinois. i» "Historical Kecords and Studies," vol. VI, Part II, p. 153. 20 Thompson, op. cit., vol. IV, p. 208. - 1 Records of St. Joseph 's Parish of Prairie du Rocher. Chapter 5. FATHER GIBAULT, THE PATRIOT PRIEST. After life's fitful fever Father Meurin now rests in peace: but for Father Gibatilt the stormiest years of his eventful career are draw- ing nigh. The Declaration of Independence, July 4th, 177(i, had electri- fied the English Colonies on the Atlantic seaboard. War was sweeping the country to the East and North. Canada was held safe for the British by French Catholics with Bishop Briands' powerful influence. "It was Bishop Briand," as his successor tells us in glo\* ing terms, "who, occupying the Sea of Quebec a1 the turning point in the history of France. Living alternately under the banner of the Fleur de Lis and again under the British standard, loyal at first to the former until, when on the Plains of Abraham, all, save honor, was lost, generously trans- ferred to the latter the homage of his entire loyalty, used all his sacred influence during those terrible days to keep Canada faithful to her new masters. And the people of Canada with few exceptions, whilst still preserving affection for their old mother-country, were happy to live in the shadow of the British flag and to know that they dwelt in one of the freest countries of the Avorld." 1 When, however, France came to the aid of the struggling Ameri- cans, this sentiment of loyalty became clouded with new hopes and fears, especially in the old French possessions on the Mississippi. Rumors of battles and sieges and massacres came floating on the air in the spring and early summer of 1778. The Illinois country, in- deed, felt safe from attack. The garrison of the little stone fort in Kaskaskia had been almost completely withdrawn to fight the rebels and Indians around Detroit. A Frenchman, Rocheblave, was comman- dant of the place. He had a presentiment of something serious im- pending, but no one paid any attention to his warnings. His business was to direct the neighboring Indians against the American frontier settlements of Kentucky and Georgia. "The principal inhabitants Avere entirely against the American cause," neither were they prepared to fight for the British. They desired only the preservation of peace. The Commandant, a bumptious personage imported from St. Genevieve, was scoffed at when making the remotest allusion to an impending attack. All was quiet along the Okaw River, when on a sudden, in the depth of night, the eagles of Avar swooped doAvn on Kaskaskia \s peaceful cit- 'American Catholic Eistorical Researches," vol. XVII, pp. 142 and 14.!. (132) Father Gibault, the Patriot Priest 133 izens. It was George Rogers Clark with his little band of so-called Vir- ginians, daring fellows from the frontier settlements of Kentucky. The Governor of Virginia, Patrick Henry, had authorized the attack. The intrepid yet most prudent Clark had carried out his own well considered plan. Kaskaskia was in the power of the Virginians, but the legend might have been reversed to say : The Virginians are in the power of Kaskaskia. Quick action must follow the surprise. Rocheblave is a prisoner of war. But the citizens of the town, and the neighboring Indians, far surpass the number of Clark's volunteers. Then Cahokia too must be captured or won over, but that is a question for tomorroAv. The situation requires immediate action. The unexpected coming of Clark's Long Knives had only disturbed and not roused the Kaskaskians to resistance. They ask permission to assemble in the Church for divine service, and a discussion of their present plight. Clark speaks kindly to them, seeing their fear and bewilderment ; for there are few things more bewildering than the surprise of an attack at night. Sagacious, as Clark is, he talks to them about the advantage of joining the Ameri- can cause, and assures them that the Americans are not the wild and beastly fellows, they had been represented to be. They listened in silence. At the general meeting Father Gibault who had been to see Clark, dis- pelled their anxieties, assuring them of the friendship and protection of the Americans. The temper of the Kaskaskias was now changed from fear to joy, as not only their lives, but their liberty and prosperity seemed secure. From that day on Father Gibault was regarded as a tower of strength for Clark's boldest plans, and the brave priest fully realized the commander's expectations. 2 The next important step to be taken by the Americans was the cap- ture of Cahokia. Owing to Father Gibault's assurances, this was easily accomplished by Clark's lieutenant Joseph Bowman. Of course, a wave of alarm and consternation swept on through the country as Bowman's cavalry troop rode into the various villages on their way to Cahokia : But Father Gibault's word reassured the people, and all was calm and quiet once more. An alleged attempt to raise the Indians at Cahokia against the invaders must have proved futile. Within ten days practi- cally all the inhabitants of the French villages from Kaskaskia to Cahokia had taken the oath of allegiance to the sovereign state of Virginia. There is nothing said here about Fort Chartres, which a few years previous was called ' ' the most convenient and best built fort in North America, ' ' for the simple reason that the currents of the Mississippi river had suc- ceeded to such an extent in their work of undermining its massive walls. 2 Cf. "Conquest of the Country Northwest of the River Ohio, 1778-1783," by William Hayden English, 1896. Chapter VII. 134 History of Uu Archdiocese of St. Louis thai this, the proudesl monument of the power of France in America was then only a crumbling ruin. Col. Clark was, of course, fully convinced that the British would try to cut off his communications with Virginia. In order to do this Vincennes on the Wabash, would be their first objective. In order to secure his hold on the Illinois towns, he must capture Vincennes. He learnt from Father Gibault, that the British Governor had with-drawn the garrison from the fort, yet the inhabitants of the town might easily thwart the effort at capture. Father Gibault counselled peaceable means of conquest. He offered to go to Vincennes himself to persuade his pa- rishioners there to deliver town and village to the Virginians. But as his duties were spiritual, he asked that Dr. Laffont, a citizen of Kas- kaskia, be appointed as head of the mission. Father Gibault, however, promised Clark, "that he would give the people of Vincennes such hints in the spiritual way that would be conducive to the business." The offer and suggestion was gladly accepted by Clark. Father Gibault re- ceived his instruction verbally : Dr. Laffont was appointed head of the delegation, but its soul was Father Gibault. Dr. Laffont was ordered by Clark to act in concert with him, "the priest, who will prepare the inhabitants to agree to your demands. ' ' The two heralds of peace started at once for Vincennes and were respectfully received at the town. Father Gibault, being the pastor of the place, knew everybody and was loved by all. When he opened to them the purpose of his mission, they were surprised : but as he explained to them, what had been done at Kas- kaskia, and that there was nothing else to be done at Vincennes under the circumstances in which the French people found themselves between two warring powers, they acquiesced to acknowledge their submission, and took the oath of allegiance to Virginia. The boundaries of the Great Republic was thus extended to the Mississippi on the west and to the Illinois River to the north. 3 Col. Clark wrote two accounts of the whole transaction, the second one slightly differing from the first. In the first version Clark claims the credit of originating the plan for himself, in the second document greater prominence is given to the priest. However that may be, Father Gibault was in reality the originator and main actor in the winning of Vincennes for the Americans. Clark's statement is that Father Gi- bault offered to go to Vincennes, and went as an emissary of Virginia. The British authorities condemned the priest for his interference by which Vincennes was lost to their cause. The Bishop of Quebec, Briand and his successor, were displeased with their former Vicar General for turning the people of the Illinois County to the American side. The a Alvord, C. W., "Kaskaskia Records," ]>. XXVII s. Father Gibault, the Patriot Priest 135 testimony in favor of Father Gibanlt's decisive influence on the exten- sion of American power north of the Ohio River is so general and con- vincing, that Judge Law's dictum is accepted by all who are interested in the matter: "To Father Gibault, next to Clark and Vigo, the United States are more indebted for the accession of the States comprised in what was the original Northwest Territory, than to any other man. ' '* It is true, that the British reconquered Vincennes, and proposed the reconquest of the Illinois villages at their earliest convenience. But, thanks to the fidelity of the French habitants, and the salutary respect for the power of America, instilled into the Indians by the adhesion of their old friends, the French, to the American cause, Col. Clark held his position in the Illinois country and regained the control of Vin- cennes. Clark's second capture of the strategic point on the Wabash was affected by French militia from the Mississippi border, under French and American officers, all of which would have been impossible if Father Gibault had not exerted his influence on the people of his love and care. Yet, as the Historian of "The Illinois Country" tells us: "In spite of the success of the expedition, Father Gibault was unwilling to be counted an actor in it, for having learned of the village gossip about his in- fluence in Vincennes, he pei-suaded Dr. Laffont to write, a few days after his return, a letter to Clark, in which Laffont assumed all responsibility. In less than a month after he started for Vincennes, therefore, he was saying that he had done nothing more than counsel "peace and union and to hinder bloodshed." 5 From this seeming contradiction it would ap- pear to follow, either that Father Gibanlt's character of courage and veracity must suffer, or that the high claims made for his name and fame as one of the great heroes of the western world must be con- siderably reduced. Now neither point of this dilemma can be justly urged. There is another possibility, a possibility that is often disre- garded. What if Father Gibault, with all his greatness and with all his grand achievements as recorded in history, was essentially a modest, humble man, "After crosses and losses men grow humbler and wiser," is a saying of Benjamin Franklin. It is a true saying. And again ; "humility is the solid foundation of all the virtues." Few men of his time have had greater losses and crosses than Father Gibault, few men among his contemporaries have attained a higher degree of virtue. Crosses laid the foundation of humility, and on humility was built the noble character of Father Gibault. The valiant Pastor of Kaskaskia could make every sacrifice for the people of his flock, without any re- gard to possible praise or blame, did he but perform what he recognized 4 Law, Judge John, "Colonial History of Vincennes," (1858), p. 55. 5 Alvord, C. W., "Kaskaskia Records," pp. 50-51. 136 History of the Archdiocest of St. Louis as his duty. The success of his undertakings was not the effecl of his work, but of the blessing of God. Le1 God be praised for all, and, if a few little fragments of praise arc due to the human instruments of divine power, let them go 1<> those who need a little praise in order to keep up their courage and good will. Father Gibaull was no common man: his character was cast in a heroic mold. His was not a "timid soul," as Clark was pleased to describe it. The stoutest heart of a father might well quake at the sighl of the sword flashing above the head of his children. Father Gibault was a true father of his people of Kaskaskia. And in regard to serious danger to himself, the brave man will seek to avoid it. as long' as duty and honor permits: only the rash and presumptuous rush into danger where they have no call. If Clark then thought he saw a certain trepidation in Father Cibault at the ap- proach of the British, where Clark's followers remained cool and col- lected; he should have thought of the difference between the French and Anglo-Saxon temperaments, the one warm and demonstrative, the other cool and contemptuous. But did not Father Gibault violate his oath of allegiance to the English King, and advise his people to do likewise? Do not the words addressed by the Canadian Bishop contain a reflection on Father Gibault's conduct at Kaskaskia and Vincenncs ; ' ' Our good friends seem at times to forget the duty of loyalty for the children of Christ's Church, [t is not a sentimental affair nor of personal interest; it is a stern and serious duty of conscience, flowing from a principle sacred, immutable, eternal, as the Divine Legislator. Let them not be uneasy, then, on the attitude of the Catholic clergy in such an affair. The past has been unassailable; the future will be, be- cause our Catholic principles do not change." Was there not a very noticeable change in the principle of loyalty as interpreted by Father Gibault's word and practice? We feel justified in saying, "no." Here is the proof: Clark's invasion of British territory was. one of the law- ful phases of our Revolutionary war. If one was lawful the other was lawful, too. Obedience to the powers that be, is the duty of the Chris- tian. And even the law of nations cannot but sanction the practice of renouncing one's allegiance to one sovereign and transferring it by oath to another, provided there be a just cause. If only Colonel Clark had been less addicted to self glorification, he would have better interpreted the spirit of Father Gibault. Not that he failed to do full justice to the priest in general, but that he, at times. cast a slur upon his friend and helper in need, not so much to set lower the priest's name and fame, but rather to exalt his own. Here is a '• " American Catholic Historical Researches," vol. XVII, p. 1 14. Father Gibault, the Patriot Priest 137 case in point : I give the event in the words of a most competent judge : "It was while matters looked most gloomy that Clark, fearing disaster, sent Father Gibault with his official papers and money across the Miss- issippi, in the dead of winter, in January 1779, to place them in safety on the Spanish side of the Mississippi. To show his friendship for the American commander, the Cure, attended by one man only, undertook the mission. For three days he was detained by the floating ice on an island in the Mississippi, but at last successfully carried out his mis- sion." 7 Now what does the doughty warrior make of this? Clark gives a vivid account of the ball at Prairie du Rocher, and the subsequent panic at the report of Hamilton's approach with eight hundred men. Then he describes his own inimitable self-possession, dancing on as if oblivious of his danger. Then, casting a compassionate glance at poor trembling Father Gibault, who probably was not trembling at all, the well-poised warrior pretended to his "timid friend," that he wanted him "to go to the Spanish side with public papers and money." It can- not be supposed that a man in his senses would send some one giving signs of consternation, on such an important mission. Col. Clark ap- parently takes no account of moral courage, that sees the danger, yet braves and overcomes it, as Father Gibault certainly did in attempting the dangerous crossing. This failure of Clark's judgment makes us very doubtful as to Father Gibanlt's alleged consternation on this oc- casion. Now , as Father Gibault realized that the Illinois Country was lost to the English, he made use of his privilege to submit to the rule of the actual masters, the United States, and to insinuate to his people the moral right of so doing, whilst refraining from counselling the act. Even oath-bound obligations cease, when the possibility of fulfilling them ceases, which was the case with Father Gibault and the French of the Illinois. In fact necessity as well as common prudence sufficiently coun- selled these people to accept the boon of liberty from those who had won it for them, the Virginians of Clark. A refusal of Clark's generous proposals meant bloodshed, rankling hatred and possible extinction. Under such conditions any just ruler would have readily absolved his subjects from their sworn allegiance to him. The British King could not have made an exception here. What Gibault really did was not to absolve his people from their oath, but only to explain to them the Church's position on this point of morality which in itself was a spir- itual matter, within his competence as a priest. Hence Father Gibault could truthfully say in his request to Dr. Laffont "that in all civil af- ' Herberman, in "Historical Records and .Studies," vol. VII, Part II, p. 132. l.'iS History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis fairs, not only with the French but with the savages, he meddled with nothing, because he was not ordered to do so, and it was opposed to his priestly vocation ; and that Laffont alone had the direction of the affairs, he having confined himself toward both (nations) solely to ex- hortation tending toward peace and union and to the prevention of bloodshed." 8 In the history of the Church the capture of Kaskaskia and Vin- cennes by George Rogers Clark is but an incident, an incident, however of far-reaching influence and importance. Such an incident it was also in the life of Father Gibault. The great missionary is often proudly extolled as "The Patriot Priest of America," comparable possibly to Father Hidalgo, of Mexican fame. "The Patriot Priest of America," meaning the United States, he certainly was not. Father Gibault was never an American in that sense. He was a Canadian by birth and education, a British subject by necessity, and, if you will, an American rebel during the war of revolution, whom the British would certainly have hanged if he had fallen into their hands. The fight between Eng- land and her colonies was not his fight, though the outcome may have interested him, in as far as he knew that France was assisting the colo- nies with ships and armies and gold. This very fact may have kindled once more the lingering hope, that France should come into its own at last. But if Canada was doomed to remain subject, either to the imperial power of the British, or the republican power of the Ameri- cans, his interest in the one and in the other was gone. So much for Father Gibault 's politics. Above all things Father Gibault was a missionary priest bent on saving souls and ever ready to protect 1 his people against the powers of evil, high or low, whether they dwelt under the British flag or the banner of Spain. Political views did not count here. Pecuniary advantages were of no consequence. He was first and foremost and always the representative of the Catholic Church, the true Kingdom of God. This fact does not in the least derogate from the true greatness of the man. For a great man, brave and strong and wise, Father Gibault certainly was. He displayed heroic courage in many a dangerous situa- tion ; he never lost his presence of mind, even when the specter of death blocked his path-way unannounced; he used admirable prudence, when a word, a suspicious movement might have ruined him and his people. He was one of the most generous of men, and his friendships were lasting and sincere. Above all he bore the mark of true greatness; he never despaired, no matter how dark and threatening the future might look. He was a man of high ideals; his supreme achievement was to » Alvord, ' ' Kaskaskia Records, ' ' p. 50. Father Gibault, the Patriot Priest 139 save what was left of religion and tide it over to a bright future he knew would come. That this acknowledged greatness of the man accomplished a great advancement for America in Clark's campaign against the British in the Illinois country, is undeniable. But here he certainly builded better than he knew. Even Clark did not fully realize the importance of the capture. It was only through the victory of Yorktown that Clark's memorable victories attained their real importance,. How far the latter contributed to the general result is hard to say. Certain it is that the decision came in the East. We, however, behold the capture of the Old French towns and the conquest of the Illinois country in a reflected glory — Heroic as they were, that mission to Vincennes through hostile bands of Indian warriors, and through the bloodless capture of the fort and town, deserves the highest admiration and praise. In this memorable deed of war for the sake of peace, Father Gibault looms up as the greater, because the gentler and more humane of the two victors. It was Father Gibault that counselled persuasion, where Clark would have been forced to use the gun and sword. By Clark's method the innocent would have suffered with the enemy; by Gibault 's prudence and persuasivenss the enemy profited with the innocent habitants of the town. The final result would have been the same under the one as well as under the other plan ; only the wounds of sorrow and anger and hate would have been opened a-fresh, and made a reconciliation of the French and the Anglo-Saxon almost hopeless. Father Gibault 's course was mis- understood or misrepresented by many of his friends and enemies. His own Bishop disavowed his act of supporting the American cause, and denied him the privilege of returning to Canada, where the venerable priest wished to spend his declining years. Yet, even his enemies had to acknowledge his right and duty to obey the powers that be ; Gibault was not an English subject except by force. He regarded the British as intruders just as much as the Virginians under Clark. Between the two contending factions the only law was "salus populi, " the good of his people. And the salvation of his people clearly lay on the side of Clark and his Virginians. Chapter 6 ST. LOT IS AS A CANONICAL PARISH Laclede's Village, as St. Lotus was usually called \)\ the early hunt- ers and rivermen, had grown into a town of marked beauty, size and importance. Stretching along' the river front it rose in three tiers of buildings, under the shelter of a ridge of considerable height that form- (d the western boundary of the settlement. The three streets running parallel to the river bore the names: Rue Royale, Rue De L'eglise, Rue des Granges. The heart of the town was enclosed by the Rue Royale and Rue des Granges running north to south, and Hue de la Tour (Walnul ) and Rw^ Bonhomme (Market) crossing them from west to east formed two squares, the Church block and Laclede's trading house and dwelling. There were nine streets on each side of the Church block, most of them named for trees, as Chestnut, Pine, Olive, etc. At that time St. Louis was without fortifications of any kind. Being built on an elevated plateau, the approach from the river was by a steep incline from the foot of the Rue Bonhomme (now Market St.). In 1764 the town number- ed one hundred and fifteen houses, fifteen being of stone, the others of logs placed in an upright position, the interstices filled in with mortar or clay. The population was a colorful mixture of hunters and trappers, merchants and voyagers, French and Spanish soldiers, who had now settled down for life. Then there were Canadian and Creole farmers from Fort Chartres, St. Phillip, from Kaskaskia and Prairie de Rocher, and especially from Cahokia, just beyond the river. All were of the Catholic faith, not too learned in ecclesiastical lore, but honest, up- right and contented people. Some of the late comers were men of distinction and culture, even members of the haute noblesse of the French court. The town enjoyed two inexhaustible sources of wealth : first, the trade with the Indians along the Missouri and the upper reaches of the Mississippi, and second, the rich soil of the prairies put under cul- tivation. Every French village in the Illinois country had Commonfields and a Commons. 1 The first designation was applied to the lands that were assigned to the various inhabitants, all fronting on the borders of the village and running in a narrow strip of an acre, more or less, to a depth of say forty or fifty or more acres. Thus each tiller of the soil had access to his land from his house and barn in the village. The i Cf. Breese, "Early History of Illinois," p. 173. Also, Billon, "Annals of St. Louis," French and Spanish, 21 and 22 and 91. (140) : v -t •HJQgff^/ •,*, ftflVKAb I Mfl»- THE SPANISH CHURCH (Called Church of the Palisades) Erected while St. Louis was under Spanish Government. Ded- icated in Summer of 1776. Served as Cathedral for Bishop Du Bourg until new building was erected. si. Louis as a Canonical Finish 111 first conimonfields of St. Louis were situated on the prairie stretching from the end of Rue Bonhomrae (Market St.) to the Great Mound in the north, the land lying southwest of the village, being well watered and covered with timber, was set aside for a Commons in which the cattle and other stock of the habitants were kept for safety and convenience. These two tracts were fenced in by the people in 1764, the eastern fence forming the western boundary of the village. The tillers of the soil living in the village of St. Louis were not as numerous or not as industrious as the progress of its business seemed to require : for this reason the nickname Pain Courte was attached to it in an unofficial way, a name that is sometimes found even in public documents. The Annalist of St. Louis 2 goes so far as to state that the village was named St. Louis a long time after its foundation. Yet this is palpably false and Billon's argumentation in support of his con- tention is equally unsubstantial. For the name San Luis is used in the Report on "Ulloa's Instructions to erect Forts at the mouth of the Missouri," October 2nd, 1767. only two and one half years after the founding of village. The Frenchmen were not aware at first that western Louisiana had been placed under Spanish rule; in fact many of them had come to settle on the western border of the river from a great desire to live and die under the lily-banner of France. King Louis XV, though in reality one of the most contemptible monarchs, was known to the colonists more as one surrounded by a blaze of glory, than as the moral weakling he really was. Besides this, he was the outward representation of their own country and nation, La Belle France. In naming St. Louis in honor of the King then hold- ing sway, Laclede chose as the future city's patron and protector the bright spotless Crusader King, St. Louis IX. We have the best of authority on this matter and the testimony of August Chouteau, the main actor in the event after Laclede : ' ' Laclede, on his arrival, named the town St. Louis, in honor of the King of France. ' ' 3 Now in May 1776 this little political unit of French Catholics under Spanish rule received its spiritual complement in being raised to the dignity of a Canonical parish, the first one in all Upper Louisiana, except St. Genevieve. The man who was named as its first pastor was a German by birth and education, a Capuchin Monk, whose title was "P. F. Bernard de Limpach, 0. M. Cap. Cure de Paroisse St. Louis 2 Billon, op. cit., p. 22. s Both St. Louis IX and Louis XV were Kings of France. As in Baptism, the name of the godfather 's patron saint is given to the child, in order to honor the godfather as well as his patron saint, so Laclede imposed the name of St. Louis, ' ' the good King St. Louis, ' ' on his village in honor of King Louis XV, the reigning sovereign. Whether Louis XV deserved the honor or not is not to the point. 142 History of tht Archdiocest of St. Louis des Illinois."' Arriving in St. Louis on May 25th, ITTii. he presented his credentials to the Lieutenant Governor of Upper Louisiana, Don Francisco Cruzat. A tVw weeks previous the Capuchin Father Hilaire de Gent'vaux, Pastor of St. Genevieve since November 1773, had visited St. Louis and brought the information that Father Bernard was on his way, and, at the same time, baptized six whites and solemnized one marriage. As the appointment and installation of Father Bernard de Limpach as Canonical Pastor of St. Louis are matters of deep interest to a wide circle of American Catholics, we would here record them in an Eng- lish translation from the French and Spanish originals, as preserved in the Spanish Archives. Both official acts throw a number of welcome side lights on the condition of ecclesiastical affairs at that far off time: The Letter of Appointment reads: "Being well and sufficiently advised of your good morals and capacity, wishing besides, to conform ourselves in all things to the orders of his most Christian Majesty who has directed us by his letters patent, registered in the records of the Superior Council of this colony, to issue in good and due form titles and commissions as curates to our missionaries who have been attending to the parishes and posts of which the mission has heretofore been in charge, merely by way of performing the functions of the Cure, and to put them in legal possession of the same ; the collation, provision and all other dis- position being reserved to us in our quality of Superior until such time as his Christian Majesty may otherwise order ; we have heretofore given and conferred and to give and confer to you by these presents the Cure of the parochial church of St. Louis of the Illinois, post of Paincourt, with all its rights and dependencies whatsoever, upon the charge of actual and personal residence there and not otherwise, until a change or revocation shall be made by ourselves or our successors. We there- fore require the ministers of the substitute of the King's representative to see that you be put in real and actual possession of said Cure or parish of St. Louis of the Illinois, as is of usage in observing the ordinary solemnities. Given at our Curial Mansion, under our official seal, the eighteenth day of February of the year of Grace one thousand seven hundred and seventy-six. (signed) F. Dagobert. Grand Vicar. 6 * The Father's name was spelled de Limpach, not de Limbaeh, as public documents show. The P. F. means Professus Frater, a professed Friar, s Eeprinted in Scharf, "History of St. Louis," p. 1639. St. Louis as a Canonical Parish 143 No time was lost in the installation of the new priest in his Cure, for on the very day that the Lieutenant Governor certified to his cre- dentials, a meeting of the inhabitants was called, and these proceedings were had: "In the town of St. Louis, at nine o'clock of the morning of Sunday, the nineteenth day of the month of May, in the year one thou- sand seven hundred and seventy-six, before me, Don Francisco Cruzat, Captain of Infantry and Lieutenant Governor of these settlements of the Illinois, and the most distinguished parishioners of the parish of said town, all assembled together in the church ; the Reverend P. Friar Bernardo de Limpach, Capuchin priest, in virtue of the dispatch which he had brought and delivered from the Most Reverend Father Dagobert de Longwy, Capuchin Priest, Superior and Vicar General of the Mis- sion of this Province of Louisiana, bearing date the eighteenth of February last passed, and the letter of direction which I, the said Lieu- tenant Governor, have received from the Senor Don Luis de Unzaga y Ameraga, Brigadier of the royal armies and Governor General of this Province, bearing date the twenty-eight of February of the current year, in which he commands me to recognizo the above named P. Friar Bern- ardo de Limpach as the curate of the said town of St. Louis ; after hav- ing performed all the ceremonies that are usual and prescribed by his said Superior, the Most Reverend Father Dagobert, he has entered into and taken legal and formal possession of the Cure of this parish of St. Louis of the Illinois; and I, the said Lieutenant Governor, have caused him to be recognized publicly, as he is recognized, by all the parishioners of the said parish and in order that the same may more fully appear and that no obstacle may, at any time hereafter, be inter- terposed to the exercise of his ministry, there shall be deposited in the archives of this government under my charge, the copy of this dispatch together with this act, which the said P. Friar Bernardo de Limpach has signed with me, the said Lieutenant Governor, and the most distinguished persons of this town, who by my command were assembled for this purpose, the same day, month and year above men- tioned. P. F. Bernard; Perrault; Du Breuil; Benito Basques; Hubert; Sarpy ; Laclede-Lignest ; A. Bernard ; Erne Barre ; Labuxiere ; Chauvin ; Conde; Jh. Conand; Franco Cruzat."" After this rather formal transaction Highmass was sung by Father Bernard, at which the little dilapidated church was filled to overflow ing. Thus began the happy, though not uneventful, period of the good Capuchin's spiritual regime of twelve long. years. The letter of Father Bernard's Superior and Vicar General is worthy of special study on account of the sidelights it throws upon the Church history of that early. e Scharf, op. cit., p. 1640. 144 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis day. First, as to Father Dagobert's jurisdiction, it becomes plain thai the authorities in New Orleans are not quite convinced of the Spanish claims. Father Cyrillo de Baerelona as representative of the Bishop of Santiago de Cuba, James Joseph Echevaria, is really the supreme author- ity iu Louisiana, but he permits the old French Vicar General of Quebec to continue in office and make the appointments. Why? Be- cause, the Superior of the Capuchin's still held the power given to him by the Bishop of Quebec, the Vicar Generalship, that was still the only valid one at least in spiritual matters, and therefore, his jurisdic- tion was certainly valid ; whilst the jurisdiction of the Bishop of Santiago de Cuba, and of Father Cyrillo was to say the least, very doubtful. The Spanish jurisdiction was finally established by Rome in 1777, the year after Father Bernard's appointment. Father Cyrillo de Barcelona brought along from Cuba a band of seven Spanish Capuchins among them the new Pastor of St. Louis. Though his name is not mentioned his personality is but slightly hidden under the designation Padre Aleman, the German Father, as Father Bernard was a native of one of the German principalities on the Bhine and very probable born in the town of Limpach in Luxemburg. The unmeaning phrase, "de dix par" appearing in the original document would indicate his place of birth, but must have been muddled by the transcriber. It may stand for "de Limpach" or for "de deux ponts," which would designate the city of Zweibruecken as the Father's place of birth. The word ' ' letters patent ' ' signifies a royal decree on a single sheet of parchment, not folded but open (patent) with a heavy seal attached at the bottom. The letters patent were issued as Father Dagobert says, by His Most Christian Majesty, that is, the King of France ; and he claims that they are in force, until His Catholic Majesty, that is the King of Spain, shall revoke them. This circumstance would prove that the Spanish ecclesiastical authorities in New Orleans still con- sidered themselves as holding from Quebec. The use of "Paincourt" as a second name for St. Louis, seems rather strange in a public document. Don Francisco Cruzat ignores it in his report on the subsequent proceedings. No doubt, at that time the nickname "Paincourt" was used more frequently than the city's proper designation, St. Louis. And what a poor little establishment this Parish of St. Louis was in regard to living conditions and the Church services. The Church built of logs, and the Parish residence were equal- ly dilapidated. The presbytere was a mere shell and empty at that. The Church had a tower in form of a St. Andrews Cross, and a little bell rang out the angelus, morning, noon, and nightfall. The necessary utensils for divine service were there, even a Monstrance for Benediction and the Corpus Christi procession. A complete inventory of these St. Louis as a Canonical Parish 14.") things was handed to Father Bernard, and he attested its correctness. But the priest's dwelling, the presbytere, nobody could live in that. The people's heart went out to their good Father in true Catholic loyalty. They determined to build a new presbytere. On September 1st, 1776, after the Highmass, the entire parish assembled in the vacant parlor of the old residence with the Lieutenant Governor Cruzal as presiding officer, to deliberate on the plan of a new parish-house. It was decided to build it of stone 45x27 feet, front and depth, and two stories high. The work was to begin in the coming Spring, and to continue until all was completed, in order to animate the good people in their generous resolution, Father Bernard obliged himself to contribute the sum of four hundred and thirty-seven livres in peltry. Hard cash was very scarce, paper-money was tabooed since the failure of John Law's flood of paper money; hence the use of peltry, deer-skins and lead as the currency of the land. A livre was about twenty cents of our money. But Father Bernard did not have the money nor the peltry. All his savings had been spent for the journey of ninety days up the river. The Parish, however, had agreed to reimburse the priest for this heavy out- lay in their cause. So Father Bernard turned the parishioners' promise to pay into the building fund of the Parish, and all were satisfied. But the parishioners too, had to lay hands on their supplies of shaved deer-skin, each one according to his financial ability. As appraisers and superintendents they chose Jean Cambas and Jean Ortez. The assess- ment was made in form of a per capita tax ; every inhabitant over the age of fourteen was laid under contribution. Whatever materials of the old structure were serviceable, should be used on the building. The bids for labor and material were opened on June 29th, 1777. Benito Basques was the successful bidder for the stone-work at fourteen hun- dred livres in peltry ; the carpenter work was assigned to Francois Delaise, at five hundred and fifty livres ; a certain Mr. Vardon under- took the building of the roof for two hundred and ninety-nine livres suspecting, probably that his competitior would bid for the round sum of three hundred. 7 We devoted somewhat more space to the building operations, than our readers may think proper. Yet, we surmise even here, that this solid stone parish-house will eventually serve as the palace of His Grace, Bishop Louis William Valentine Du Bourg, in 1818. Old illustrations show it on the south side of the porch-girt Church, on the Rue de L'eglise, now Second Street, between Market and Walnut. The cem- etery occupied the north side of the Church block between Rue de f Wilson Primm's "History of the Catholic Church in St. Louis," read before Missouri's Historical Society, September 7, 18G7. 146 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis L'eglise, and Rue des Granges, all in the very heart of the town of St. Louis. Father Bernard's modi of life was very simple. An old negro- slave, Melanie, kept house for him. Besides their Pastor, the Parish employed several other officers, all of the laity. A chanter or two, a sacristan, a verger with pike and halberd like the Swiss in foreign Cathedrals; all these petty officers received a share of the usual fees paid to the Pastor. From a Table of Fees for Funerals made by Father Gibault, whilst Pastor of New Madrid, it appears that, of the total fee of nine pesos (about nine dollars) four pesos went to the pastor, one peso to the. assistant priest, one peso to the sacristan, one peso for digging the grave, and one peso for placing the wooden cross, making nine pesos in all. 8 The villagers had been accustomed to pay tithes, yet, according to Canadian rules, not one tenth, but only one twenty-sixth part of the corn and wheat raised by the farmer. But even this small emolument was claimed by the State under Spanish rule, in view of the annual salary of four hundred to six hundred pesos paid by the government to each priest. There were no fees for Baptisms and Marriages, but a more or less generous honorarium was usually offered. At marriages the witnesses and more prominent guests, would repair to the Sacristy after the mass, in company of the bridal pair, to sign their names, or make their mark, and to lay down on the table an offering to the priest. Hence all the Marriage Records of our old French parishes are filled with the signatures of the men of importance in their day and even of historical characters. Of the mild and gentle Capuchin's priestly labors during thirteen and a half years of his stay at St. Louis, the Church Records give us some interesting information. From May, 1776 to November 1789, Father Bernard baptized 410 whites, 106 negroes, and 92 Indians; he solemnized the marriages of 115 whites, 1 negro, 2 Indians and 1 mixed white and Indian; and he buried 222 whites, 60 negroes and 44 Indians. Two years after Father Bernard's arrival in St. Louis, on June 20th, 1778, Pierre Laclede Liguest died near the Post of Arkansas, on his homeward voyage from New Orleans, where he had gone on business in the fall of 1776. As Ovid said of his great predecessor: "Virgilium vidi tantum," Father Bernard might have said of the Founder of St. Louis "Laclede I only saw." a s A similar list of fees in Father Bernard's handwriting is in my collection of MS. fl His name occurs among the witnesses of the installation of Father Bernard. St. Louis as a Canonical Parish 147 In the fourth year of Father Bernard's gentle sway over the peo- ple of St. Louis, May 26, 1780, a serious attempt was made by the British to sweep both the American and the Spanish powers out of the Miss- issippi Valley. Simultaneous attacks were to be made on New Orleans from the South, on the Ohio River country and the Illinois settlements on both sides of the river from the northeast. For this latter bloody business the warlike tribes of the North were engaged with liberal gifts. Governor de Leyba gained some information in regard to the proposed assault, but he seems to have disregarded the signs of the coming storm until it was almost ready to burst over his little town. But he did rouse himself at last and sent for all the reenforcements he could reach. It was the afternoon of the 26th of May, that saw the approach of a flotilla of canoes and pirogues crossing the river to the north of the town. The citizens of St. Louis defended their homes with spirit and bravery ; and the Indians who had depended on a surprise attack, quickly withdrew before the unfailing fire of these dauntless woodrangers and boatmen. The Spanish garrison consisting of fifty men and five cannons under Captain de Leyba did valiant work. Some of the Indian bands scattered about the country found several farmers and their slaves in the fields, whom they tomahawked. 1 " Governor de Leyba has been stigmatized by some as a traitor, by others as a coward. We believe he was neither the one nor the other, but only one of the many that trust too much in themselves. Mis- fortune, however, was now following in his tracks ; on December 6th. 1779, his wife was buried, and he himself in 1780 followed her into eternity. The following entry in the Book of Sepulchres was made by Father Bernard : "In the year 1780, the 28th of June, I, a priest and Capuchin Missionary, Pastor of St. Louis, country of the Illinois, province of Louisiana, Bishopric of Cuba, have interred in this Church in front of the balustrade on the right, the body of Don Ferdinand Leyba. Cap- tain of Infantry in the battalion of Louisiana, actual Commandant of this post, having received all the sacraments of our mother, holy Church. In faith whereof, I have signed, the day and year as above. F. Bernard, Miss. Shortly before the Governor's premature death Father Bernard solemnly blessed the "first stone of the fort on the hill back of the church, it was named Fort St. Charles, in honor of Charles III, King of Spain." This is the stone Martello fort which was yet standing as late as 1820, at the southwest corner of Walnut and Fourth Streets, where the Southern Hotel now sleeps in its decay. The barracks for i° For documents ef. "Spanish Regime in Missouri," Houck, vol. I, pp. 167 -182. 148 Histoni of I In Archdiocese of St. Louis the Spanish troops was a long, low stone building on the north side of Walnul street, and immediately opposite the hotel. Alter the change of government from Spain to the United States, the old fori was for a long time used as a common jail. Every Sunday ami Holy day of obligation Highmass was sung with all the joyful accompaniment, to which the French Catholics are accustomed by nature and early training. With the usual sermon the service generally lasted until noon. As all the inhabitants of the town were Catholics, all of them, with the exception of the sick, would attend the Highmass. After the mass the Governor's announcements were made at the church-door. Even business transactions were concluded then and there. In the afternoon the young people enjoyed themselves on the river bank or at the home of one or the other of the village patriarchs. singing and dancing to their hearts content. Chaptek 7 FATHER BERNARD'S CONGREGATION It was a gay, cheerful, and lighthearted congregation over which Father Bernard presided, fond of song and witty anecdote, yet simple in their manners, and dress and the pleasures of the table. They still lived in the style of the peasantry of old France one hundred and fifty years ago. Their language was not the pure French of France, but a synthesis of the antiquated dialect of the Provinces, from which they originally came. As St. Louis had never been an Indian mission, the mingling of races was less observable here than in the towns beyond the river. Now and then there was a regular marriage between a white man and an Indian woman, with one or two instances of white women marrying leading Indian chiefs or warriors. But such marriages were not encouraged by public sentiment. The people loved France and the customs of their old homes in France. "Notwithstanding that they had been so long separated by an immense Avilderness from civilized society, they still retained all the suavity and politeness of their race" as even the severest critics admit: 1 "they were naturally of a peaceful disposi- tion, educated to obey, kept in hand by the Church, and acutely sensi- tive to the disgrace of punishment. They were docile and respectful to their superiors, helpful and kindly to their equals, civil and complaisant to all. They liked to call one another "brother" or "cousin," and to be mutually obliging." 2 The people's honesty in business dealings was proverbial among friends and foes. Only one example from the address of Judge Primm. "Real estate frequently passed from hand to hand, without deed or writing of any kind, and for trifling considerations." When the popu- lation began to increase by immigration, and to become heterogeneous in its character, many of these lands became valuable ; and if, upon examining the records, the chain of title to them was found defective, by lack of deed from the original owner, his children never hesitated to affirm the act of their ancestor ; and whenever applied to for that pur- pose, the answer was, "I will make good what my father has done." And no remuneration was asked for or expected. 3 i Ford, Gov. Thomas, "History of Illinois," p. 36. 2 Scharf, "History of St. Louis," p. 273. 3 Primm, Wilson, in "New Year's Day in St. Louis," in Missouri Historical Society Collections, vol. II, p. 17. (149) 150 History of th( Archdiocesi of si. Louis Their dress w;is as simple as their mode of life. Monette. describes the winter dress of the men as "a eoarse capote drawn over the shirt." The women, were remarkable for the sprightliness of their conversa- tion and the grace and elegance of their manners. And the whole population lived lives of alternate toil, pleasure, innocent amusement, and gayety. Filial piety also was one of the beautiful traits of char- acter in these people. To quote once more from the delightful pages of Judge Primm: "Before day, New Year's morning, the whole popula- tion attended mass,. When that duty had been performed, the next was to receive the parental blessing and then could be seen the children, jrrandchildren, and the great grandchildren, each on their bended knees, imploring a blessing from the authors of their being, and that blessing was given, even coupled with a heartfelt prayer, that God, the Father of all, would ratify it in heaven and so guide and protect them, amidst the joys and sorrows, the snares and perils of this life, as to fit them for another and better existence." 4 This touching ceremony, repeated at the commencement of each year, gave tone to the whole current of their thoughts and acts. Filial piety, was their guiding star. The young never dreamed of forming matrimonial alliance with each other, without the full and unqualified assent, not only of the immediate parents, but of the family relatives, and even grown men settled in life, scarcely ever entered into any important business contract, without the assent or advice of the parents; and never even when it might otherwise have been to his advantage, has a child been known to repudiate the acts of his parents. When the consent of the parents had been obtained to a marriage, the affianced pair would together visit the relatives, saying : ' ' Nous sommes venue demander votre consentement a notre marriage : " " We have come to ask your consent to our marriage. ' ' 5 Marriage was held in high esteem, though the marriage bond was not unfrequently broken. Yet, a bigamist could find no sympathy or toleration. "When it was discovered the Bonaventure Collell, who married Dr. Conde's daughter, had another wife in Spain, the marriage was forthwith annulled. Collell imprisoned, and all his property seized and confiscated." 6 "In food and drink they are temperate," says another witness, "they mostly limit their desires to vegetables, soups, and coffee. They are great smokers of tobacco. Ardent spirits are seldom used, except by the most laborious classes of society. They even dislike white wines * Primm, Wilson, "New Year's Day in St. Louis," in Missouri Historical Society Collections, vol. II, p. lfl •"> Primm, 1. c. p. o Scharf, "History of St. Louis, p. 306. Father Bernard's Congregation 151 because they possess too much spirit .... Clarets and other light red wines are common among them ; and those who can afford it are not sparing of this beverage. The fathers of St. Louis were the very soul of hospitality. The master of the house, out of respect for his guests, frequently waited on them himself." 7 Sober, frugal, not too industrious to lose the joy of life, but plodding enough to keep themselves and their loved ones from want, these spir- itual children of Father Bernard, grew into one family of many chil- dren, whom, with all their faults, we cannot but love and honor. ' ' The Church was not only the place of worship, but also the center of their daily lives, the place of joyful resort on Sundays and Holy Days, of which there were many more than today, and Father Bernard, their gentle pastor was also their trusted advisor, director and companion of young and old. "The people looked up to him with affection and reverence, and he upon them with compassion and tenderness. He was ever ready to sympathize with them in all their sorrows, enter into all their joys, and counsel them in all their perplexities." 8 We may well picture to ourselves the tall dignified figure of the Capuchin Monk, in his habit of brown with a heavy beaded rosary dang- ling from his girdle, and a kindly smile on his large open countenance, walking along one of the streets of the village, now stopping at a shop to speak a word of cheer to the master, who has just lost his wife, then passing on to one of the block-houses to visit some sick person, then coming out of the door, and making a profound bow to one of the aristocrats of the village, we see him suddenly surrounded by a noisy band of children, who insistently plead with their "Father" that he come and play with them. Now from the next house comes a silvery voice of greeting. It is the chanter's daughter and one of the singers too. And so his morning walk continues until it is time for the usual Catechism class. What a quiet, happy life he leads in this homely village full of blessed peace? There is no fear in the hearts of his people : there is only reverence and childlike affection. There are some among them that cause him anxious care ; but they, too, will at last return to God. Many of those that now are faithful and true, were at one time forgetful of the religious practices their religion enjoined. During the journeys and voyages, their marriages may not have received the sanction of the Church, their children may have remained unbap- tized. But they always retained the feeling, that they must be reconciled to the Church, and have their marriages solemnized with the sacred ' Stoddart, Amos, "Sketches, Historical and Descriptive of Louisiana," 1812. pp. 325-326. s Ford, op. cit., pp. 35 and 36. L52 History of Hn Archdiocese of St. Louis rites and ceremonies, and their children must be baptized and instruct- ed in the Catechism and admitted by the priest to their First Holy Com- munion. They considered it a religious duty to make their will, in which the firsl clause is sure to read somewhat like the following; though not always in such beautiful terms. "First as a Christian and a Cath- olic I commend my soul to God the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, beseeching His divine bounty, by the merits of His passion, and by the intercession of the Holy Virgin, of Holy St. John, my guardian angel and of all the spirits of the celestial court, to receive it among the bless- ed." The greatest delight of these people was the round of feasts and festivals of the Catholic year. Christmas with its midnight mass in the brightly ornamented Church, the glad New Year, the Epiphany, the Feast of Three Kings whom the star led to Bethlehem, the solemn func- tions of Holy Week, the Commemoration of Christ's Resurrection from the Tomb, the Feast of the Ascension, Pentecost, the coming of the Holy Ghost; and then, scattered throughout the year, like fragrant flowers, the Feasts of the Blessed Mother of God. But the most glorious celebra- tion was that of Corpus Christi day with its sacramental procession through the streets of the town, with its music and song triumphant, and its salutes of all the cannon, to Christ their King and Lord. All felt secure and contented under the truly paternal government of Catholic Spain and the heavenly ministrations of the Church. We have drawn this picture of the patriarchal age of our city from the various accounts made at the time or shortly after by dis- interested observers. Father Bernard not only saw the rapid growth of his own village and parish, but also lived to see it the proud mother of four gracious daughters, Carondelet, St. Ferdinand or Florissant, St. Charles, and Portage des Sioux. Carondelet, the oldest of these villages, grew out of a trading post established by Clement Delor de Treget, a native of Quercy, in the south of France. It was a small stone house on the River des Peres near its mouth, about ten miles below St. Louis, prob- ably on the very site of the Jesuit missionary establishment for the Kaskaskia Indians and the French traders of the Mississippi Valley, under Fathers Marest, Pinet and Mermet, and the Great Chief Rouensa. Coming up from his home in St. Genevieve, Delor was charmed with the diversified landscape of hill and prairie and woodland, and obtained a grant of land from St. Ange. At first the settlement that grew up around the founder's house, was called Delor 's Village, then Catalan's Prairie, then Louishurg and finally, Carondelet, in honor of one of the s First clause of the Will of .John B. Vatican, dated November 23. 1708. Father Bernard's Congregation 153 governors of Louisiana, Baron Carondelet. Among' the jovial wood- rangers and boatmen it was known as "Vide Poche" (Empty Pocket.) The village grew but slowly, and had, at Father Bernard's time, about twenty families, all Catholics. The largest settlement of that time, in neighborhood of St. Louis, was St. Ferdiand or Florissant. Francois Dunegant is named as its founder, and 1786 as the date of its founda- tion. The place is mentioned previous to the date given, Francois Dunegant being described as "Civil and Military Commandant at Floris- sant," as early as 1785. Yet this may refer to the Florissant Valley as such and the plantations therein without any reference to a special village. St. Ferdinand de Florissant is situated, as Edward Flagg wrote in 1836, " in a highly romantic valley upon the banks of a creek of the same name, and is the heart of one of the most fertile and luxuriant valleys ever subjected to cultivation." 10 In 1798 long before Flagg 's visit, Zenon Trudeau, Spanish Lieutenant Governor of Upper Louisiana, had this to say in regard to St. Ferdinand; "It is about eleven years since the village of San Fernando and Carondelet have been settled by the people of San Louis, who at the present time, get a great part of their provisions from these two towns." 11 Stoddart calls the valley "the granary of St. Louis." Marais des Liards, Cottonwood Swamp, is men- tioned in Trudean's report as a home of hunters and of a few planters. There was no Church building nor priest in the Florissant Valley, when Trudeau wrote, and he advises his government "to send them a priest of the Irish nation," who might "also serve the small village of Marais des Liards." 12 The population was almost exclusively French and Catholic in Father Bernard's time. The reason for asking, that an Irish priest be sent to St. Ferdinand in 1798 will appear, if we consider that many English-Americans were coming to the country, some of them Cath- olics, others heretics, and all in need of instruction. There was St. Andrew on the Missouri, where the Commandant, James Mackay, a native of Scotland, complained that his settlement could not thrive, if only Catholics were admitted. The Spanish government was not desir- ous of excluding English-Americans, even if they were non-catholics. The remedy to be introduced was the conversion of the heretics by Irish priests. Whether Father Bernard spoke English, we do not know : we do know, however, that he spoke French and Spanish and his mother tongue, the German. St. Charles, the third one of the dependencies intrusted to Father Bernard, as pastor of St. Louis, Avas the earliest white settlement north io Flagg, E. "The Far West," p. 261. 11 Houck, L., "The Spanish Kegime in Missouri," p. 249. is Hoiu-k, op. fit., p. 250. L54 History of llu Archdiocesi of St. Louis of the Missouri Kiver. Founded in 1769, it was known at first as "Les Petites Cotes, the Little Hills," as the village was situated at the foot of a range of hills. The first settler was Louis Blanchette, a native of the dioeese of Quebec in Canada. The town grew rapidly. The in- habitants divided their time and energy between the fur trade and the cultivation of their lands in the two commonfields adjacent to the town. In 1797 the village had about eighty families. The fourth dependency or mission of Father Bernard was Portage des Sioux, a village located on the Mississippi River on the tongue of land that runs to a point at the mouth of the Missouri. A portage means a strip of land between two rivers where the canoes, after having carried the Indian or voyageur, are now carried by them from one river to an- other. Such a portage gave the name of the village, "des Sioux" was added in memory of the Sioux Indians, who had used the portage there, Francois Saucier in 1765 established himself at the portage and quietly induced a number of the Creoles on the American side to join him. He laid out the village in 1799 and acted as Commandant of the post until the end of the Spanish regime. All these French settlements, villages and towns were under the spiritual power of Father Bernard. His visits for the purpose of hold- ing services and of comforting the sick and dying must have been frequent. No doubt, he was the owner of some kind of conveyance. No doubt also, these visits were a source of consolation and joy to the good pastor : yet in the end they were bound to tell on the health and buoyancy of spirit. Of all these dependencies not one had a church building up to 1789. It was after Highmass on the 13th day of October 1788, that the entire congregation consisting of thirty-two families, of Les Petites Cotes was assembled at the house of Louis Blanchet, founder of the village, in presence of Manuel de Perez, Governor and Commander in Chief of the Western District of the Illinois, and of Reverend Father Bernard, Missionary and Pastor of the Parish of St. Louis, and of the Sieur Louis Blanchet, founder, who wish to have a Church for said place, and did unanimously determine, consent and agree amongst themselves to build a Church of logs, on ground 40 feet long by 30 feet wide. This resolution was signed by all, either by name or mark, Maturin Bouvet was appointed syndic. The building was to be com- pleted in the Spring of 1789. The place was then called "Les Petites Cotes." There were good roads leading from St. Louis to St. Ferdinand, St. Charles, and Carondelet. Portage de Sioux was easily accessible by boat. On the way to Carondelet, there were several habitations, as the Soulard Place, the Bent Place and several others, in Father Ber- Father Bernard's Congregation 155 nard's time, of course, they bore other names. The Bent Place was well known to the people of Cahokia as the best landing for canoes. Then there was immediately South of this a little Indian village oc- cupied by remnants of the Shawnee and Delaware tribes united in one band. This site is now occupied by the Arsenal. We possess only one literary monument from the hand of Father Bernard de Limpach : It is a pathetic plea to his Superior in New Orleans to be recalled from the place he had served so long, and we may add, so well. The letter was written in 1787. Eleven years had passed since he departed from his countrymen of the German Coast for the wilderness of the North. Broken with afflictions of body and mind, he begs to be allowed to return to them. As a further reason for his request Father Bernard says: "The Parish which is very num- erous, has four villages depending on it, and these increase daily by the emigration of French families that establish themselves here, to be free from the vexatious of the Americans, who are on the eastern side of the river. If I insist on a removal, I am guided by the hope of finding somewhere else an alleviation to my bodily and to mental trouble. Everything else is of no consideration to me." 13 Father Bernard's 14 petition was not granted until the autumn of 1789. is Original in Catholic Archives of America, Notre Dame University. 14 On February 24th, 1790, after a voyage of about ninety days, Father Bernard established himself as Pastor of St. Gabriel, Iberville. In the next year he became Pastor of Point Coupee, where he died on March 27th, 1796. Chapter 8 DISCORD i\ CHURCH AND STATE < »nc of the great historians of Rome has said "Concordia parvae res crescunt, discordia maximae dilabunter." 1 How applicable this sentence is to the religious conditions obtaining on both sides of the .Mississippi during the next, ten years after Father Bernard de Limpach's arrival in St. Louis is quite apparent. < >u the Missouri side the .spirit of concord was prevalent, as we have seen; on the Illinois side the spirit of discord helped to destroy what was left of the greatness of former days. Not that there were no good and true men among the priesls of the eastern shore; but the unfortunate clash of authority between Baltimore and Quebec was certainly not conducive to harmony between the priests. Father Gibault had been appointed by Bishop Briand, not only as missionary and parish priest, but also as Vicar General in all the former Illinois country east of the .Mississippi River. In 1785 when he took up his abode in Yincennes he considered himself as still in- vested with all these powers, as they had never Ween withdrawn. On the other hand Dr. John Carroll of Baltimore, the Superior of the Missions in the United States, held that, as all the territory as far as the Miss- issippi was now part and parcel of the United States, it was also placed under his spiritual authority. Hence he sent several priests to these for- lorn regions. They were not of his own clergy, but men who had come to him with special recommendations for the West. The first one of these was the Carmelite Paul de St. Pierre, who had been one of the chap- lains of Rochambeau's army during the revolution and whom the French envoy had requested to remain in America, among the French Cath- olics on the banks of the Mississippi. As early as July 19, 1783 Father Farmer, the Vicar-General of Dr. Carroll of Baltimore, wrote to his Superior in regard to Father Paul: "At present I know of no com- munication with the Illinois, nor can I think there is any proper mis- sionary there. With regard to the Carmelite Friar all that I can say of him is this; — No sooner did he arrive in Virginia with the French troops than he wrote a letter to me desiring to stay in the mission, and therefore inquired where to obtain faculties for that purpose. When I pressed him last fall to stay with the French Consul in Virginia, (he, having a yearly pension from the Queen of France, is under obliga- tion to take up his abode where some French are) he excused himself i Sallust, Jugurtha, 10.6. (156) Discord in Church and State 157 by saying he, being immediately under the Consul, would not be so free to serve the people, but oblige them to attend him and his hours. The Capuchin of New York has contracted a friendship with him hist Fall in the West Indies, and speaks highly of him." 2 When Father Paul de St. Pierre approached Father Farmer with the request for Faculties, the Vicar-General wrote to Dr. Carroll, the Prefect Apostolic: " — The Bearer being already known to your Rever- ence, needs not my commendation. When he arrived during the war, he immediately by letter signified to me his desire, to be a missionary in these parts. He designed to fix himself at the Illinois. I see no reason Avhy I should not be glad of his zeal nor why Your Reverence should not grant him necessary faculties, servatis servandis. You may be assured that nothing happened this long time so agreeable to me as your appointment to the office of Prefect Apostolic." 3 In the meantime Father de St. Pierre had departed for the West. Shortly after his arrival at Vincennes he sent another application for faculties through Father Farmer, which was transmitted to Dr. Carrol, August 1785. By this time Father Gibault had established his residence in Vincennes. Presenting his credentials from Vicar General Farmer of Baltimore, Father de St. Pierre asked for a temporary assignment, until Dr. Carroll should make other dispositions. But as Father Gibault did not wish to act in this conflict of authority, he advised the Carmelite to accept the Parish of Ste. Genevieve from the Spanish authorities, May 18, 1785. Here he continued to labor for the cause of Christ until July 10, 1786, as the Records of that ancient Parish witness. But as Kaskas- kia became orphaned by the departure of Father Louis Payet, Father Paul came to the assistance of this parish also, no doubt with the ap- proval of Father Gibault, as representative of the Bishop of Quebec. Whilst attending Kaskaskia, de Saint Pierre received from Baltimore a notification in regard to the Jubilee, a recognition of his good stand- ing in the Diocese. Ever since Father de St. Pierre's departure for the Illinois country Monsignor Carroll was in a state of unrest in regard to the Carmelite Father. To Cardinal Antonelli, Prefect of the Propaganda at Rome, he wrote on February 27, 1785 ; "As to the Catholics who are in the territory, bordering on the River called the Mississippi and in all that region, which following that river, extends to the Atlantic Ocean, and from it extends to the limits of Carolina, Virginia and Pennsylvania — this tract of country contains, -' Farmer to Carroll in "American Catholic Historical Researches," vol. V. No. 1, p. 28. 3 Farmer to Carroll, Researches, vol. XXIII, 3. 158 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis I hear, many Catholics formerly Canadians, who speak French, and I fear that they are destitute of priests. Before I received Your Em- inence's letters there went to them a priest, German by hirth, but who came last from France: he professes to belong to the Carmelite Order: he was furnished with no sufficient testimonials from his lawful Super- ior. What he is doing and what is the condition of the church in those parts, I expect soon to learn. The jurisdiction of the Bishop of Quebec formerly extended to some parts of that region: but I do not know whether he wishes to exercise any authority there, now that all these parts are subject to the United States." 4 Of course, the Prefect Apostolic was mistaken as to the former extent of the Bishop of Quebec's jurisdiction, and of his present claim. In reality Quebec had neither lost nor relinquished its former rights on the eastern borders of the Mississippi. Consequently Father Gibault, the Vicar-General of the Bishop of Quebec in the missions of the Illinois country, wrote from Vincennes, where he was then stationed, to his Superior, Bishop Hubert, June 6, 1786: "A barefooted German Carmelite, thirty-four years old, with his priest's orders, a certificate from the colonel of the regiment, in which he served as chaplain until peace was made, and some letters from the Grand Vicar (Farmer) granting him the privilege of min- istering on the banks of the Mississippi, without mention of any place in particular, whose name is Father de St. Pierre, came here a year ago in the name of M. Carroll, bishop-elect of America, from whom came his orders. I did not dare to say anything to him without your orders, and I did not write to you about it sooner, for he kept saying that he was going to return to France by way of New Orleans. However he is still in the Illinois. He seemed to me very zealous, but with a zeal quite unmanageable for these regions without justice." 5 Now, although Bishop Hubert was not very favorably disposed to Father Gibault, on account of their differences in the matter of the American Revolution, he did not disavow his action in regard to Father de St. Pierre. On the contrary he was glad of it, and subsequently urged Bishop Carrol "to continue for the present to provide for these missions, as it would be difficult for me, (the Bishop of Quebec) to supply them myself without perhaps some offence to the British government." 6 Father Paul do Saint Pierre was therefore, in good standing, in as far as he had lawful powers from the Diocese of Quebec; consequently his adminstration of Kaskaskia and Cahokia was without a legal flaw, no matter what Dr. Carroll's intentions had been. Yet even after this ex- planation, Dr. Carroll's doubts and fears in regard to the Carmelite's * Shea, J. G., "Life and Times of Archbishop Carroll," p. 257. 5 "Illinois Historical Collections," Virginia S., vol. I, p. 547. 6 "Illinois Historical Collections," Virginia S., vol. I, p. 588. Discord in Church and State 159 legal status did not cease. As late as January 20, 1790 he states in a letter to Father Gibault : "I am also worried in regard to M. de Saint Pierre. He left here without any power to administer the sacraments, for at that time I pos- sessed no right to grant it to him; and since his departure I have been unable to make up my mind to send him that power, because I am in no wise assured that he came to America with the consent of the superiors of the Order or with such approbation as the usages of ecclesiastical dis- cipline require," 7 Bishop Carroll's main difficulty sprang from an unfortunate mis- understanding. The decree of the Propaganda appointing Dr. Carroll Superior of the Mission in the Thirteen United States of America, dated November 26, 1784, contained the restrictive clause that he was to give faculties to no priest coming into the country, except those sent and approved by the Sacred Congregation. P. Paul de Saint Pierre did not have this approbation, having come here long before that restriction was made ; but for the same reason he did not require that approbation, as the letter of Cardinal Antonelli, which accompanied the decree, informs Dr. Carroll that," the f acidities which His Holiness communicates to him. the Superior of the Mission, are also communicated to the other priests of the same states, except the administration of Confirmation, which is re- served for him alone." 8 Msgr. Carroll, in the course of time, also inclined to this view and entertained a more favorable opinion of de Saint Pierre's ecclesiastical status. At least he permitted him to continue his ministry under whatever authority he may have claimed to act, a course that was certainly the most sensible and just one, in view of the immense distance of these missions from the See of Baltimore and the absolute dearth of Mission- aries in the west. De Saint Pierre's readiness to accept responsibility when matters were so urgent, deserved recognition. The Recommend- ation given to de Saint Pierre by the French minister was a good sijrn. and, if the worst should come to the worst, no one could blame the authorities at Baltimore if they tolerated something which they could in no wise prevent. As we now understand the whole matter, we feel that the coming of the Carmelite Father to the Illinois country was a real God-send, a boon that enabled hundreds and hundreds to save their souls, and greatly helped to tide over the Church, during its stormiest period, unto a more gracious time. It was not a pleasant place to live in, the Kaskaskia of 1786. Law and order seem to have vanished from the land. The French authorities 7 "Illinois Historical Collections," Virginia S., vol. I, p. 592. s Shea, op. cit., pp. 243, 244, 246. 160 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis were superseded by the British. These were driven out by the Virginians, and they iii turn had departed, Leaving the poor Creoles to the mercy of marauding Indians and upstarl politicians whose sole endeavor it was to deprive trustful people of their homes and their honor. When the stalwart Carmelite arrived. Ids honest blood began to boil, and he did not mince words in Ins attack upon these birds of prey. Of course lie was sued by two of the main sinners before a renegade magistrate. Father Paul refused to appear before a tribunal that was " incompetent to judge ecclesiastical persons." As to his accusers, he told them to carry the case before "the Honorable Congress and the Bishop." The aggrieved persons took the hint for lack of something more effective: they brought their complaint before the authorities at Baltimore saying: "We are doubtful whether you have sent us a priest to look after our spiritual interests, as he is more concerned with temporal affairs and acts as a lawyer in this country. He endeavors to ruin us in our commerce, and to take away our credit .... I do not think, my Lord after the letter that I have seen, that a pastor ought to meddle with temporal matters." 9 This seems to have been the end of the case against Paul de Saint Pierre, whom the complainants called Heiligenstein, which very probably was his name before taking the garb and style of a Carmelite. Father de Saint Pierre remained Pastor of Ste. Genevieve and administrator of the neighboring parish of Kaskaskia until the arrival of the new pastor, Father Guignes in 1786. Father Gibault, who had been repeatedly asked by the good people of Cahokia to take charge of this forsaken and almost ruined parish and Indian Mission, requested Father de Saint Pierre to undertake the laborious task, sending him at the same time the power of attorney he himself had received from the Superior of the Seminary of Quebec by authority of the Bishop concern- ing the mission of Cahokia. The last letter of Father de Saint Pierre from Kaskaskia, a latin letter to Father Louis Payet at Detroit, is dated, Parochia Immaculatae Conceptionis, die 18 Februarii, A. D. 1786. From this date on to 1789 de Saint Pierre was pastor of the Parish of the Holy Family and the Tamarois Mission at Cahokia, just across the river from the rising city of St. Louis. It is a remarkable coincidence, that in these critical years two German priests, P. Bernard de Limpach and P. Paul de St. Pierre, the one at St. Louis, the other at Cahokia, separated by the great river but united by the bond of a magnanimous friendship, should unfold their blessed missionary activities fn spite of all attacks and misunderstandings. Prior to de Saint Pierre's coming, Father Bernard had, at Father Gibault 's invitation, attended to the spiritual wants of the church at Cahokia, and Father de Saint Pierre was ready to return the favor in St. Louis, 9 "Illinois Historical Collections," Virginia S., vol. I, p. 521. Discord in Church and State 161 if Father Bernard should be called away. On April 25, 1787 Father Bernard writes to his Superior in New Orleans "The parish of St. Louis is no more than half a league from that of Kahos (Cahokia) which at present has a priest, who was chaplain to the army of the King of France ; and therefore it can more easily remain for a time without a priest, than other parishes farther down in the colony, as, for instance, that of St. Charles, whose subjects no doubt are no less dear to God and to the King that those of Illinois." 10 In those primitive days of pathless forest and trackless prairie the rivers appeared more as avenues of approach than as a dividing line, a circumstance that may explain, to a certain extent, the strange wander- ings to and fro of our early priests, especially as the population on both sides of the Mississippi was really one people of Catholic French. On the 6th day of June 1786, Father Gibault sent a message to Quebec concerning the zealous or rather over-zealous, Carmelite, "with the privilege of ministering on the banks of the Mississippi." On the 17th day of October of the same year, Dr. Carroll's Vicar-General, de La Valiniere, writes concerning a meeting he had held with P, Bernard de Limpach and another priest in St. Louis, in which several charges against P. de St. Pierre had been discussed and proved to be without foundation, and he ordains that the good people of Cahokia give him, as their lawful pastor, all the satisfaction in their power. The letter was ordered to be read on Sunday, after the sermon of the parochial Mass, and afterward affixed to the door of the church. 11 But ere six months had elapsed, a remarkable change had come over de La Valin- iere 's position in regard to the one time "Lawful pastor," now only "acting in the capacity of Parson of Cahokia." The change is ex- plained in the document entitled ' ' Letter from M. Huet de La Valiniere, Vicar General in all the districts north of the Ohio, called Belle Riviere, along the Mississippi, Wabash, Miami etc., to the gentlemen of Cahokia, greeting and blessing in our Lord." 12 It is not very pleasant read- ing, this letter of the Vicar-General and whatever may have been the merits of the case, it should not have been laid before the people for adjudication. To rehearse these charges against one of his priests before a gathering of laymen was sufficiently imprudent ; but here to add to each charge the matter-of-fact answers of the accused priest, and to 10 "American Catholic Researches," January 1898. The Church of St. Charles on the German Coast, Cote des Allemands, a few miles above the city of New Orleans, was founded by the German settlers returning from Arkansas after the failure of John Law, the proprietor of the seigniory on the Arkansas River. ii "Illinois Historical Collections," Virginia S., vol. I, pp. 548 and 549. 12 "Illinois Historical Collections," Virginia S., vol. I, p. 551. Vol. 1-6 162 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis season the whole proceeding with diverse slurs and insinuations, was certainly not calculated to win the parishioners to the side of authority. But hefore we enter upon this unfortunate quarrel let us see who and what Father de La Valiniere really was. Born at Varade in France. January 10, 1732 Pierre Iluet de La Valiniere went to Paris and enter- ing the Seminary of St. Sulpice, became a member of that community. He felt t ho attraction of the American mission fields, which at last drew him to Montreal. Here he was ordained by Bishop Pontbriand, June 15, 17T)5. Serving at first as a professor in the Seminary, he was suc- cessively transferred to five parishes within twenty years. In 177!) Canada was invaded by an American army. Bishop Hriand was ab- solutely loyal to the British interests all through the years of the Revolu- tion: only a few of the clergy sympathized with the American Cause, among them Father de La Valiniere. This circumstance brought about his exile from Canada. 13 Governor Haldimand writes as follows in ex- tenuation of the drastic manner employed in deporting the refractory priest : "Fiery, Factious and turbulent, no ways deficient in point of wit and parts, he was too dangerous at this present crisis to be allowed to remain here, and accordingly, taking advantage of his disagreement with the Seminary of Montreal and with the Bishop, he is now, with the consent of the latter, sent home ; as it rather appears that the blow proceeds from his ecclesiastical superiors, any noise or disturbance about it here is avoided, and at the same time may oblige the clergy, especially the French part of them, to be careful and circumspect ; the French alliance with the Colonies in rebellion has certainly operated a great change upon their minds, and it too generally runs through the whole body of Canadians. However disagreeable it may be, it is im- proper he should be permitted to return to his native country. I think he must either be confined, though well treated, or sent prisoner at large to a remote part, where some inspection may be had over his conduct. In short, there cannot be a doubt that, while these troubles last, he will seek every opportunity of serving France, and of being of Disservice to the British interests." 14 is American Catholic Historical Researches," vol. XXIII, pp. 203-255. Also vol. XI, pp. 98-101. 14 "American Catholic Historical Researches, " vol. XXIII, p. 203. It was during that time, (1758) that he succeeded in rescuing from the hands of the Indians, a little Irish girl named O 'Flaherty, at the very moment when these barbarians were about to make her perish by fire. "They had already tied her to the stake with Mrs. O 'Flaherty, her mother, and were preparing to burn them both, when that ecclesiastic, by his prayers, his entreaties and promises, succeeded in delivering them from death." This child, whom Madam d 'Youville received under her roof, devoted herself to her benefactress and became a Sister of Charity. Discord in Church and State 163 Lord George Germain disapproved Haldeman's act. Father de la Valiniere was set at liberty and, after many hardships and dangers surmounted, he directed his course to New York. 15 Dr. Carroll would not or could not give him employment. Father Farmer, his Vicar-Gen- eral, in February 1786 transmitted to the exiled priest the "power to perform parochial work, without restriction, to the French." At Father de la Valiniere 's request, Dr. Carroll gave him permission to go west, and on the day of his departure made him his Vicar-General with full faculties. 16 Father de la Valiniere paid a brief visit to Father Farmer at Philadelphia, thence he journeyed on foot to Pittsburg, and by batteau down the Ohio to Kaskaskia, where he arrived in the summer of 1786. At first his fiery zeal for justice and righteousness, in open opposition to the self-appointed governor, John Dodge and his harpy crew, won him the love and admiration of the habitants. And when through his appeal to Congress, the turbulent robber faction was overthrown, Father de la Valiniere felt himself safe in the hearts of his people. Yet fiery and self-willed as he was, he was led by an insignificant circumstance to kindle a new and dangerous fire of opposition, a con- flagration which eventually drove him out of the Illinois. The only priests over whom the new Vicar-General had jurisdiction, were the veteran Pierre Gibault at Vincennes and the Carmelite Paul de Saint Pierre at Cahokia. Both were honorable men and faithful ministers of God, doing their duty according to their best knowledge of the situa- tion in which they found themselves : But Father de la Valiniere, with practically no experience of missionary life in the wild west, felt the urge within himself to let them feel his superiority in ecclesiastical knowledge, as well as in canonical power. The questions he raised in his letter to Father de Saint Pierre were either trivial or did not concern him. 17 Father Paid answered the letter, justifying his con- duct, in a straightforward manner, but as de la Valiniere had indulged in a rather paternal tone of reproof, Father de Saint Pierre injected some insinuations regarding Father de la Valiniere 's former trouble. The good Vicar-General thought his position in jeopardy and addressed a public letter to the people of Cahokia, in which he made some caustic remarks and undignified charges against their pastor, whom he had praised a short time before, and even called in question his ordination to the priesthood. Father de Saint Pierre's parishioners, who loved 15 "American Catholic Historical Researches," vol. XXIII, p. 212. ig "American Catholic Historical Researches," 1. c, pp. 218 and 219. 17 Priated in Researches, vol. XXIII, pp. 221-223.' Father de Saint Pierre's answer, ibidem, p. 225. 1 6-i History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis and respected him, returned a lengthy reply, from which we cull the following strong passage: "We answer the same (your letter) by declaring to yon, all of us, with an unanimous voice, that Mr. de St. Pierre our Parson, pastor and missionary, has all our confidence, and that we have only to praise and applaud him and the spiritual zeal with which he instructs us as well as our children. It is in vain that you expect to rob us of the confidence we repose in him. His attachment to us and his disinterest- edness is known to us. Therefore, sir, dispense writing us anything more disadvantageous to the conduct of a Priest as worthy of respect as M. de St. Pierre whom we all reverence . . . . " ls Having thus caused a division among the Catholics of the Illinois country, Father de la Valiniere soon found that his old enemies were not completely shorn of power,. Even in his own parish of Kaskaskia, the majority of the French turned against him. On September 21, 1787 a petition to Congress against him was signed by the inhabitants of Kaskaskia, in which his moral character is not touched, but a number of grievances are set forth, as the fury of his disposition, the theo- cratic despotism, the violence of his passions. 10 Father de la Valiniere saw that he could no longer accomplish any good; he therefore asked the Bishop of Quebec that Canada might be opened to him once more and receive the last fruits of his priesthood, as it had received the first." 20 This pathetic appeal remained unanswered. In 1789 Father de la Valiniere left the Illinois country going to New Orleans. In 1790 he was at St. Sulpice in Montreal, but the Bishop would not ap- point him to any position and even refused him permission to celebrate mass. The first and partly successful undertaking of P. de Saint Pierre at Cahokia was the attempt at recovering the property once held by the Seminary of Quebec for the Tamarois Mission, and for the Parish of the Holy Family, but sold or disposed of by the last Vicar-General under the French regime, Father Forget du Verger. The sales were null and void, as Father Forget had not been authorized by the right- ful owners; in fact, Father Forget 's conduct in leaving the Illinois country as he did was condemned by Bishop Briand of Quebec, as "shameful, even criminal." All that remained to the ancient parish were "four walls of a stone house, with ground three hundred feet wide by nine hundred feet long, and also a Held, three arpents wide with a length the same as the fields belonging to the inhabitants," and even these remnants of the parish- property, like that of the mission seigniory, were in danger of being lost. is "Illinois Historical, Collections, " Virginia S., vol. I, pp. 560 ss. is "American Catholic Historical Researches," vol. XXIII, pp. 228-231. 20 "American Catholic Historical Researches," vol. XXIII, pp. 235 and 236. Discord in Church and State 165 Here Father de Saint Pierre's aggressiveness served him and his people to a good purpose. The story of the proceedings for the recovery of the mission property and the material upbuilding of the parish of the Holy Family is vividly described in a Report made by the people and the trustees of the Parish and Mission of Cahokia to the gentle- men of the Seminary of Quebec. After telling them the particulars of a recent sale of the remnants of the mission property the inhabitants of Cahokia say: "We made no opposition, since we had no knowledge at the time of the power of attorney, which the Superiors of the Chapter, by the authority of the Bishop had sent to Father Gibault, and of which Father Gibault had made no use." They continue: "This has been communicated to us about the month of April 1786, by M. de Saint Pierre, the priest serving our mission . . . We have learned from this power of attorney, that all the sales made by Father Forget, Grand Vicar of Monseigneur, were null and void, since they had never been authorized by the Chapter .... Consequently, we have judici- ally set aside and annulled all the sales made by Father Forget and others who have succeeded him, and have annulled the instruments which the attorney of M. Jutard has had made and which concerned the sale by auction . . . We have reestablished you in the possession of these goods. For the purpose of lodging our pastor we have built a priest's house, which has cost us almost five thousand livres . . (We were obliged to do this) because the house had been entirely ruined by the English and American troops who have lodged there. . The defacements and injuries it had suffered during the time it was abandon- ed were such that there remain standing only the four walls, whicb could be repaired only with much labor; for they are without a roof- covering, ceiling, flooring, and the chimneys have tumbled down ; there are some fences on the land; the orchard has been so devastated that there is left no vestige of it ; all the other buildings have been de- stroyed, even to the wells which have been filled in. "We have decided to build a church of the ruins of this house, for our former wooden church has fallen, and we are obliged to have Mass in a rented house. We have commenced to work on our projected church, which will cost us more than fifteen or sixteen thousand livres. Since the Mission has no longer any slaves, M. Forget having pocketed and carried away the money which he was able to collect for them, and since the three arpents of land will become a charge against the Mission, on account of the expense for fences and maintenance, we consulted with M. de St. Pierre and decided to rent it . . . As to the other property, such as slaves, mills and animals, all these "have been entirely dispersed and made unusable at the departure of M. Forget, either by sales, the granting of liberty to the slaves, or by donation Iiiii History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis of the animals, so that none of these things arc to be round at the .Mission. There are still some families of Negroes on the Spanish side, who arc of considerable value. They are living either at St. Louis of the Illinois or at New Orleans, and were either given their liberty or were sold by M. Forget without authority. There are some even here in the village of Cahokia. We have made a demand for those living on the Spanish side; but the major Commandant of the Illinois dis- trict has refused to do anything . . . Before we saw the contents of the power of attorney addressed to M. Gibault, we were uncertain, whether the sales by M. Forget were legal or not, and were fear- ful of taking false steps and of putting ourselves to useless expenses . . This power of attorney, which has been sent us, has reassured us and opened our eyes; and we shall work now for the rccslablishment of our Mission, as far as it shall be in our power."- 1 Up to this time Father Gibault's headquarters had been Kaskas- kia. But in 1785 he removed to Vincennes. Here he pursued the same pastoral plan he had inaugurated years before in Kaskaskia. Writing to Mgr. Briand from Vincennes in 1786 he says: "I give the boys and girls an instruction twice a day : after mass, and in the evening be- fore sunset. After each instruction 1 send the girls home and make the boys repeat the responses of the mass and the ceremonies of the Church for Sundays and Holydays. 1 preach too, on these days as often as I can." 22 Here also, he found more leisure to devote to his books, a con- siderable collection of which he had accumulated, mostly on theological subjects, as he writes in 1786 to Bishop D 'Esglis. 23 It also occurred to him in his solitude, that he had certain claims against the government of the United States, if not for services rendered, at least for expenses incurred. What Father Gibault did in this direction is best describ- ed in his letter to Governor Arthur St. Clair — "The undersigned mem- orialist has the honor to represent to your excellency from Cahokia, May 16, 1790: that, from the moment of the conquest of the Illinois country by Colonel George Rogers Clark, he has not been backward in ventur- ing his life on many occasions in which he found that his presence was useful, and at all times sacrificing his property, which he gave for the support of the troops." 24 In the St. Clair papers this letter is marked, "Paper No. 24, and endorsed by St. Clair, the request of a Mr. Gibault for a small piece of land that has been in the occupation of ^i "Illinois Eistorical Collections," Virginia S., vol. I, pp. 560 ss. 22 "Illinois Historical Collections," Virginia S., vol. II, p. 535. M "Illinois Historical Collection," Virginia S., vol. 11, p. 545. 24 "The St. ('lair Papers," vol. II, p. 14«, quoted in Researches, vol. V, p. .">i > . Discord in Church and State 167 the priests at Cahokia for a long time, having been assigned to them by the French ; but he wishes to possess it in propriety. It is true that he was very useful to Gen. Clarke, upon many occasions, and has suffer- ed very considerable losses; I believe no injury would be done to any one by his request being granted, but it was not for me to give away the lands of the United States." 23 Republics are proverbially ungrateful. Father Gibault had ex- perienced that. Disappointment followed disappointment. His own people of Vincennes were not as responsive to his word as of olcL Weary of constant struggle the missionary thought that he had earned a rest from his labors. Bishop Carroll does not seem to be pleased with his presence in what is now a part of the diocese of Baltimore. Canada is after all his home. "Monseigneur", thus we read, "I pray you to consider that for the last twenty years I have served these missions, without ceasing, without, so to speak, a fixed abode, almost always journeying in all sea- sons of the year, always exposed to being massacred by the savages. My age of fifty-one years, the need I have of being more recollected after so much exterior work, which entailed so many and such long journeys, the repugnance that I have to serve under another Bishop, be it in Spain or in Republican America, and a thousand other reasons, lead me to expect you to grant my request and to recall me, which I earnestly ask, believing that I follow in this the will of God who inspires me with it for my salvation. As to the spiritual aid of the people in these parts, I can assure you that it will not be wanting to them, even less than formerly, since they have a priest at the Kaskaskias, another at the Cahokias, and that they will not be long without having one at Vin- cennes, if I leave it, for it is the favorite post of the American Congress. This all conspires to make me hope for my recall. ' ' 26 But the recall did not come, and in September 1789 he took over from Father de Saint Pierre the Parish of the Holy Family at Cahokia to which he had been assigned long years ago by Bishop Briand of Quebec. Father Paul de Saint Pierre had been kindly received by the Spanish authorities ; Father Gibault was now to follow him. Bishop Carroll was glad to give them both his fervent blessing on entering their new field of labor. We shall meet them again, the one in Ste. Genevieve, the other in New Madrid and the Post of Arkansas, both doing valiant and efficient service for the cause of God and His church. 25 St. Clair Papers, vol. II, p. 148. Researches, vol. V, p. 53. -<> Alvord, C. W., "Knskaskia Reeorrls" in "Illinois Historical Collections, Virginia S., vol. II, pp. 583 and 584. Chapter i» RESULTS OF THE DISCORD But we must return to the closing years of the Spanish regime in Louisiana to mark the advent on Missouri soil of two priests faithful unto death: Father Pierre (iibault as Pastor of New Madrid and the Post of Arkansas, and Father Paul de Saint Pierre as Pastor of Sic Genevieve and of Point Couppee in the South. How these two faithful priests came to serve the Church under the Spanish regime must now be explained in proper detail. During Father Paid de Saint Pierre's incumbency of Cahokia, the people had requested that the Bishop of Quebec should ratify appoint- ment of their present pastor as a missionary also for the Tamarois Indians. The Bishop's response is not known, yet the request did not seem to be out of harmony with the views of Bishop Hubert, who, October 1788, declares that the Seminary had "resigned its prerogative of nom- inating a superior among the Tamarois only in favor of the Bishop of Quebec," a right which seems to have been exercised for the last tim° when the saintly Father Francis Savine came to Cahokia in 1812. Father de Saint Pierre remained at Cahokia until September 1789, as pastor and missionary, and the parish began to revive and flourish under his fostering care. Good order and decency in all things pertaining to the religious life were always the object of his vigilant care, and he did not hesitate to employ force, even to the extent of calling on the civil power, when- ever it seemed necessary. In the minutes of the Court of Cahokia we find a number of instances. On December 10, 1786, M. de Saint Pierre, the parish priest, present- ed the petition, requesting the prohibition of giving strong drink to the savages. The Court decreed that "the ordinance passed heretofore shall be published next Sunday and that offenders shall be punished accord- ing to said ordinance." In March of the following year the pastor, de Saint Pierre, re- quired an oath from every member of the Board of Trustees assembled in the presence of the court, that none of them had taken and hidden certain valuable papers entrusted to them by M. Du Buque. All took the oath and were declared free from suspicion. In all the French settlements of the Mississippi Valley, the so-called coutumes de Paris (the customs of Paris) were regarded as the com- (168) Results of the Discord 169 mon law of the land, even in what was afterward called Spanish Louisiana. According to these customs the parish priest had a right to the tithes, originally one-tenth part of the harvest, but now, accord- ing to Canadian modification, only one twenty-sixth part, or about 4, instead of 10 per cent of the wheat and corn. Besides this, every family in its turn was required to furnish the pain benit, the blessed bread, of which every one attending the solemn service received a small piece. This custom of the pain benit was probably introduced by St. Greg- ory of Tours and prevailed in Canada and several dioceses of Prance as late as thirty years ago, but seems now to be passing in desuetudinem everywhere. On January 2. 1789, de Saint Pierre entered suit against some in- habitants of Cahokia on account of their refusal to furnish the pain benit. They in turn claimed there was no obligation. The court, however, was impressed by the pastor's arguments, and declared that the obligation held, and ordered these refractory inhabitants to give the blessed bread, each in his turn, on the days of obligation; in default whereof they were to pay ten livres to the church to make up the deficiency. 1 P. de Saint Pierre was certainly a valiant defender of the rights of the Church, and as such we shall see him again in his new field of labor beyond the great river, in Ste. Genevieve. Cahokia had, indeed, grown dear to his heart ; but he felt, at the same time, that there were other places that offered a far better field for his priestly labors. The Spanish side, with its great possibilities under Catholic rule, seemed to say : Come,. And then, there was another reason that weighed heavy in the balance, the spirit of restlessness that had taken possession of his own people. Although Father Gibault did openly take a prominent part in effecting the bloodless conquest of the Illinois country by the Amer- icans under Clark, and although the Creole inhabitants considered a ready submission to the new regime not only a matter of necessity, but also of advantage, they did not have a very deep love for the new- comers : nor could it be justly expected of them. Sudden changes in the administration of a country are always bound to bring certain hard- ships. So it was in the frontier-towns of the American Bottom. The Virginia troops had withdrawn ; no authority had been established ; dis- order and lawlessness was in full sway, Cahokia alone making an ex- ception to this by establishing a court of justice. The Creoles were offended by the overbearing ways and rude manners of many of the i Cf. the article on "Bread, Its Liturgical Use," in the "Catholic Encyclo- pedia." Also the article on "Blessed Bread in Detroit," in "The American Cath- olic Historical Researches," vol. XII, p. 176. 170 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis adventurers from the East, and in their native candour and honesty found themselves exposed on all sides to fraud, injustice and even vi- olence. In consequence many of the most important Creole families left their old homes for Ste. Genevieve or St. Louis The government beyond the river was, indeed, Spanish ; but the people, the laws and customs, and even the officers were French. Besides, the Spanish govern- ment was making strong efforts to draw the remnants of the Catholic population to the western shore. Land grants were offered to all new- comers. For this purpose of attracting the people other enticing offers were made to the missionaries of the east side, and they found a ready acceptance. On May 1, 1787, Father de Saint Pierre had addressed the follow- ing petition to Bishop Cyrillo, asking for the appointment to some parish on the Spanish side. My Lord: Three years ago, Mr. Cruzat asked you to give me the parish of Ste. Genevieve, but as he told me, his letters reached you too late, and Rev. Father Louis (Guignes) had obtained the parish. Knowing that this same parish is vacant since Fall, I ask you humbly for the favor. Already some of my parishioners, for good reasons, have established themselves on your side of the river, and I hope that the others will soon follow them; therefore I beg you to allow me to follow them also. A new establishment (New Madrid) has been begun a little below the entrance of the Beautiful River. They will need a priest who knows English and German. I offer myself also for this place. You may dispose of me according to your pleasure and good will. I take the liberty to send you a copy of my papers, legalized by the Commandant of Ste. Genevieve, to convince you of the falsehoods that have been spread about me, and of which Mr. Cruzat has already in- formed you. Finally, I will try to act in such a manner that you will never regret to have granted me the favor which I humbly beg of you. During my whole life I shall be with profoundest respect, Monsignor, your humble and obedient servant, Paul De St. Pierre, Discalced Carmelite of Germany, Missionary. Kaokias, May 1, 1787. 2 This request was now granted by Bishop Cirillo, and Father de Saint Pierre entered upon his duties of pastor of St. Genevieve in 1789. Father Le Dm of Kaskaskia had preceded him in becoming Pastor of - The original is in French and can be found in the Catholic Archive* of America, Notre Dame, Indiana. Results of the Discord 171 St. Louis as successor to P. Bernard de Limpach, and Father Gibault followed soon after, accepting a call to New Madrid in 1792, where he built the first church and dedicated it to St. Isidore. Ste. Genevieve remained the home of Father de Saint Pierre until February 27, 1797, a period of about seven years. As a further cause of this change of allegiance the circumstance is given that the Creoles of the American Bottom no longer showed a willingness to render the usual tithes for the support of the Church. Under American rule there was, of course, no law to enforce the pay- ment of the tithes. On the Spanish side the legal obligation was, indeed, cancelled by decree of April 22, 1787, but the practice was still in force among the people and tolerated by the authorities. This source of income was an important matter to a parish priest, though the proceeds varied ac- cording to time and place. Father Gibault in 1769 received from the people of Ste. Genevieve about 300 bushels of wheat and 500 to 600 bushels of corn; P. Bernard, however, reports that the tithes received at St. Louis never amounted to more than $80.00 a year. Yet, important as the tithes were, there was a still more important source of income, granted by the Spanish and denied by the American authorities — a regular salary of $600.00. With this assured income and the usual perquisites, a parish priest under the Spanish regime need not trouble himself about his temporal support. It was in the month of September 1789, that Father de Saint Pierre returned to Ste. Genevieve. On the 13th day of September he perfor-med his first official function, the baptism of a child, and he remained as pastor until 1797. He established his home with a few slaves, who kept house and managed the farm for hiim In 1790 the negro woman Fanchonette, whom he had obtained out of the estate of Pierre Langlois at Kaskaskia, was sold by him to Tropez Richard for $275.00 ; and on his departure from Ste. Genevieve in 1797 two other slaves were sold by him. All this may seem strange to us, yet slavery was then a universal institu- tion in these regions. Ever since the great flood in 1785, Old Ste. Genevieve, with its church of St. Joachim, declined ; its very site rapidly disappearing in the river. For a time, divine service was held in a temporary structure in the new settlement, whilst preparations were under way for the removal or reconstruction of the church. In 1793, September 7, the Lieutenant Governor, Zenon Trudeau, came to Ste. Genevieve at the request of Father de Saint Pierre and assembled the inhabitants for the purpose of submitting the project of erecting a new church in the place "where they had sought refuge from 17 - J History of Hn Archdiocese of St. Louis the flood." 1 The plan was heartily approved by the inhabitants of the new village, Petite Cote, as it was called; but the people of the neighboring village of New Bourbon also asked for the erection of a ehapel. The parish meeting decided thai both villages, although only three miles apart, should have churches of their own. Messrs. Lachance, Pratte and Bol&UC were appointed syndics to apportion the burdens of the building costs according to the financial abilities of the inhab- itants, and the same gentlemen were approved as supervisors of the building operations. 4 It was ordered that the material of the old building should be used. as far as possible, for the new church in Ste. Genevieve. On August 31, 1794, Zenon Trudeau made definite choice of the spot for placing the church in the new village and gave orders that it be built, pledging the government's share of the costs. The new church of Ste. Genevieve was a wooden structure, similar to the old church at Cahokia, and remained standing, though for a time disused, until 1831, when it was torn down to make room for other pur- poses. Prom the Memoranda of Benedict Roux, we gather that P. Paul de Saint Pierre on two occasions attended to the spiritual needs of desolate Kaskaskia (May 1785-June 1786; and February 1792-December 1796). Ste. Genevieve, however, remained his home and regular charge.'' A number of very interesting reminiscences of the days of Father de Saint Pierre are given in Henry Brackenridge's Recollections of the West. Brackenridge had, as a boy. been sent to Ste. Genevieve for his education at the parish school and had found a new, most pleasant home with the family of Vital Beauvais. It is a graphic account that the grateful author gives of the peaceful, joyous and sincerely religious family life in the days before the coming of the Americans. Madame Beauvais, especially, is a most admirable Catholic woman. She loved the little Brackenridge as if he had been her own ; but she could not bear the thought, that he, an unbaptized child, should share the bed with her own children. She therefore had him baptized by Father de Saint Pierre to make her happiness complete. 3 Original documents in the Air-hives of the Missouri Historical Society. * Ste. Genevieve Archives. From a letter of P. de Saint Pierre, Ave learn that the proposed chapel in New Bourbon had not been started in January 1796, when Father de Saint Pierre wrote: "The three hundred dollars the governor does not wish to have delivered until the chapel at New Bourbon is built. This chapel, in my opinion, will do more harm and cause more disorder than the amount is worth; but let the inhabitants decide." s Ste. Genevieve Archives, at Jefferson Memorial, St. Louis. Results of the Discord 173 The little English boy, te petit anglais, as they called him, was now admitted to the dignity of an altar-boy, and as such he received a larger portion of the pain benit, the blessed bread, which however, he did not eat, but brought as a choice morsel to his favorite, the baby of the family. Many years afterwards, on a chance visit to Ste. Genevieve, he came just in time to witness the marriage of this early friend of his child- hood. Brackenridge also speaks of the many religious festivals and processions, of the Sunday High Mass and Vespers, by which the spir- itual life of the people was constantly renewed, and he dwells with deep feeling on the innocent pleasures and simple pastimes of the dreamy village, in the good old days of Father de Saint Pierre.' 1 The cure enjoyed the love and respect of all. Of course, there were exceptions. Even in peaceful Ste. Genevieve there were crooked ways that had to be made straight, and proud wills that had to be broken. The Ste. Genevieve Archives, now in charge of the Missouri Historical Society, preserve a letter of de Saint Pierre, parish priest, to Don Francisco Valle, the Commandant of the district, dated August 8, 1796, in which he expresses his deep regret that one of his parish- ioners, living in open sin, would not heed his voice, and now he calls up the Commandant "for a judgment and punishment. The person whom the said Louis Coyteux has in his house, pretends throughout the parish that she is his wife and he calls her so. I implore your aid in order that you may, by force, make her leave his house ; and in order to put an end to the scandal, forbid her taking up her residence too near that of the said Coyteux. In case he should show resistance, it will be necessary to enforce the law made by our Monarch, December 24th, 1787, which may be found, no doubt, in your record office, or in the archives of St. Louis; for it was made public not long ago." The decision of the Commandant was given on the 31st. of August, 1796: "Don Francois Valle, Captain of Militia and Civil and Military Commandant of the Post of Ste. Genevieve of the Illinois and its dependencies. Upon the oft repeated petitions made to us by the Sieur de St. Pierre, cure of this parish, asking that a stop be put to the public scandal resulting from the cohabitation of Mr. Louis Coyteux, resident of this post, with an English woman, whom he has had at his home, for a long time, which is contrary to good morals, also to the ordinances of his Majesty. We, the aforesaid Commandant, do order Mr. Louis Coyteux to eject from his house the said English woman, and that within twenty- 6 Brackeridge, "Recollections of the West," passim. 174 History of the Archdiocese of Si. Louis lour hours after being notified of the order, under penalty of being prosecuted to t lie fullest extent of the law. Executed at Ste. Genevieve. August 31, 1796, before noon. (Signed Fcois Valle. " 7 ) The vexed question as to the tithes also came up once more in the same year, 1796. How it was settled we cannot say. Here is the letter of P. de Saint Pierre to one of his confreres, probably Father Bernard of St. Louis : "There is a difficulty between the Saeristan of this parish and a married soldier who keeps his home separately in his own house. The Saeristan asks 39 litres of wheat for the beadle aecording to the custom of the parish and again as much for himself annually. The soldier refuses to pay. I believe the soldier is obliged to pay since he has his house and family outside military quarters. The beadle told me that the commanding officer holds a different opinion. I wish to be well informed before I speak to him and 1 ask you to tell me what is customary in your parish, and if you can, inquire from the Lieutenant Governor himself. If the officers of the regiment who reside in their own houses in the capital are obliged to support public works, I am sure that the soldiers in Illinois or any other garrison should be equally obliged. Your most obedient servant, Paul De Saint Pierre." 8 As Father de Saint Pierre, by his long and faithful service, had firmly established himself in the affection of his people, it was a great shock to them to hear that their good pastor had been recalled. Gone from Ste. Genevieve he certainly was, since December 1795, and no one knew whither he had gone. All the old rumors, so long asleep, woke up suddenly and set about their ugly business. The ancient story of the conflict with Bishop Carroll and his long-departed Vicar-General, De La Valiniere, had taken on a new lease of life. The truth was that Father de Saint Pierre had quietly undertaken a journey to Baltimore in order to settle this very matter for good, as we learn from a letter found in the Archives of the Missouri Historical Society. In accordance with this fact, we find the name of de Saint Pierre is wanting in the Records of Ste. Genevieve from December 3, 1795, to May 22, 1796. In its stead we find for January and February, 1796, the name of Pierre Joseph Didier, Parish Priest of Saint Charles; in March, Pierre Janin of St. Louis ; in April Didier once more, and in May, Jacques Maxwell, the new Vicar-General. On the 27th day of Ma v. 1796. P. de 7 Ste. Genevieve Archives. 8 " American Catholic Historical Researches," January 1898, p. It. A litre is 1.76 pints. Results of the Discord 175 Saint Pierre returned to Ste. Genevieve. The journey to Baltimore had occupied about six months, the time of his absence from the parish. The letter we referred to is addressed to Don Francois Valle, the Com- mandant of Ste. Genevieve under date of New Orleans, January 20, 1796: ' ' My Dear Friend : I must inform you of the atrocious calumnies that are being" cir- culated in regard to me : 1. That the Bishop of Baltimore had forbidden me all sacerdotal functions within his jurisdiction. 2. That I had performed them during an entire year without his orders. 3. That he had finally driven me from the American Illinois and ordered that his parish priests should have all my jurisdictional functions done over again. I at once asked that I be informed of the authors of these calumnies ; but they are being hidden from me, I do not know for what reason. At the same time, I asked permission to be allowed to go in person to see the Bishop of Baltimore on this subject. This permission was given me, with the very highest testimonial regarding my conduct, which, it said, was altogether above reproach during the time that I officiated as parish priest with you, and an appeal to the Bishop was added at the same time, that he pronounce judgment on the above mentioned charges. According to these false reports it was believed that I had abandoned my duties as parish priest without having reported to my superiors. In this belief, before my arrival here (in New Orleans), another priest was sent in my place. In conformity with my promises made to the inhabi- tants I shall not accept any other parish than that of Ste. Genevieve. I was assured that it would be reserved for me, and that orders would be issued to the afore-mentioned priest to go farther on. Upon my return to your town, I, on my part, promised to clear my- self, with the high testimonal of the Bishop of Baltimore, of the calumnies made against me and to show the falseness of the alleged articles. This step did not cost me anything, as I had been engaged to take the trip by sea for reasons known to you. Be kind enough to present my respects to your wife and give my love to all of your family for me. Say to my friends and all the parish- ioners that I appreciate highly their affection, and that I am absolutely unalterable in the resolutions and promises which I made, of not accept- ing any other parish than theirs, and that I absent myself from them, only to justify myself against the calumnies of wicked tongues, that I may remain with them for a longer and more peaceful period. Beg them also to cherish, assist and satisfy, in every possible way, the priest who 1/ii History of lln Archdiocesi of St. Louis will be sent in my place, and present my respect to him, and say that whatever I have is at Ids service and at Ids disposal, so as to make his stay agreeable." But the days of Father de Saint Pierre as Pastor of Ste. Gene- vieve were already numbered. Father James Maxwell, an Irish priest, who had made his studies at Salamanca, had arrived just before de Saint Pierre's return from Baltimore, in May 1796. Father Maxwell came as Grand Vicar of the Bishop of Santiago de Cuba and took up his res- idence in New Bourbon, whilst de Saint Pierre for a time continued his priestly ministrations at Ste. Genevieve. Two priests, in what was practically one parish, could not exist and would not subserve the best interests of religion. Father de Saint Pierre, though not removed, had to leave. The old militant spirit bowed to the acknowledged authority of the new-comer. On the second day of January 1797, a public auction was held, at which the former pastor's lot of ground with house and barn, and all pertaining thereto, two slaves included, were sold to the highest bidders. The property is described as fronting on the Kue de l'Eglise, and bounded on the one side by the home of John B. Valle, and the homes of Augustin Aubuchon and John B. Lalumandiere on the other. The amount realized was 1600 pesetos or dollars, payable either in money, or lead and peltry. The last entry of Father de Saint Pierre in the Baptismal Record of Ste. Genevieve was on February 27, 1797. What his immediate destination was we could not discover ; probably the capital of the Province, New Orleans. Did he retire for a time from active service, or did he perhaps make a visit to the old home across the sea? The monasteries in France were abolished long since. In his native land he was forgotten. America had become his true home. But what was his later course ? After the erection of the diocese of New Orleans in 1799, with Msgr. Louis Pehalver y Cardenas as its first bishop, we catch a glimpse once more of Father de Saint Pierre in Natchez^ The historian, John Gilmary Shea, in one of his letters to Chancellor Van der Sanden speaks of a voluminous-document in Spanish, preserved in the diocesan Archives of Baltimore ; a kind of record of trial under Bishop Pehalver of Father de Saint Pierre for breaches of discipline. The outcome of this trial must not have been unfavorable to the much buffeted missionary. In any case he was one of the four priests of the twenty-six in all Louisiana, who, according to the statement of the Administrator, Rev. Thomas Hassett, December 23, 1803, "agreed to remain in their respective stations under the French government," and in consequence he received the appointment as Pastor of St. Gabriel's, Iberville, a parish on both sides of the Mississippi, "rather difficult to attend but also very lucra- tive," as a contemporary writes. Here Father de Saint Pierre labored Results of the Discord 177 with great, no longer "unmanageable" zeal and success, and until his death, October 15, 1826, fully twenty-two years. Father Laval, in his notes transmitted to John Gilmary Shea, prais- es Father de Saint Pierre as "one of the most remarkable priests that ever administered St. Gabriel's church." "During his time," he says, "the church was removed from its former place on the bank of the Miss- issippi to where it now stands, the river having swept away the bank in front of it in 1717." At St. Gabriel's Father de Saint Pierre, the last representative of the old regime, received the visit of Father Francis Cellini, one of the earliest followers of Bishop Du Bourg, who in his letter dated September 30, 1822, styled him "le brave et bon de Saint Pierre." Bishop Rosati never paid the old lion the honor of a visit. On September 23, Father Anthony Blanc of Baton Rouge, informed Bishop Rosati that he had administered the last sacraments to the pastor of Iberville. De Saint Pierre, whom he regularly styles, "the Old Man," being in his eighty-first year, could not, in all probability, survive the illness. The parish itself, he added, was in a flourishing condition. The older people attended High Mass and the Sunday Vespers with greatest regularity and devotion. Because the parish had for so many years en- joyed a well-ordered pastoral care, it would be advisable to appoint a successor immediately after the death of de Saint Pierre, or even during his lifetime ; in the latter case, the successor might reside at Baton Rouge. The "Old Man" would not have an assistant. The bishop, suggests Father Blanc, might appoint a Lazarist, or Father Michaud, who was fatigue et degoute souverainement du service a la paroisse de N. Orleans. There was another reason for this undignified haste. The "Old Man" himself had provided the necessity for an early appointment. There was a clause in the good Father's Last Will bequeathing all his property, valued by Father Blanc at about $6,000.00, exclusive of two slaves, furniture, cattle, etc., to his successor. Another clause ordained that "the priest who should officiate at his burial was to be the administrator of his estate, two laymen to assist him." Father Michaud received the appointment immediately after the death of the testator, and Father Anthony Blanc performed the last rites of the church over the remains of his friend and neighbor. P. Paul de Saint Pierre had found rest eternal. Per varios casus, per tot discrimina rerum, his memory still lives as one of the most remarkable men of our early western days. For Father Pierre Gilbault, also, there was no place any longer in Bishop Carroll's diocese, of which Cahokia now formed a part. The Spanish authorities, however were glad to secure the services of such a distinguished priest. The rising town of New Madrid, together with the old settlement Arkansas Post, were assigned to him, and they 178 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis enjoy the honor of having received Father Gilbaults' last ministra- tions. The site where New Madrid was now in process of building, L'Anse a la Graise, lay on the great Indian trail to the North and West. It had all the advantages necessary for a good trading post. Strange to say, this Catholic town with a proud Spanish name owes its origin to an Anglo-American and a Protestant at that, Colonel George Morgan, a native of New Jersey and a graduate of Princeton. Trader, judge, Indian agent and soldier of distinction, Colonel Morgan was with O'Rielly's fleet, when the Spaniards took possession of Louisiana (1769). In a memorial addressed to the Spanish Ambassador Don Diego Gar- doqui, Morgan proposed to establish a colony near the mouth of the Ohio, the Beautiful River, as it was then called, in territory then belonging to the Spanish crown, in which he promised he would have at least one hundred thousand souls within ten years. But two conditions were laid down by Morgan ; the settlers should have the right of self government, and should be exempt from taxation. Gardoqui granted the concession, subject, however, to the approval of the King. The grant embraced from twelve to fifteen million acres of land along the Mississippi from the mouth of the St. Francis River in Arkansas, to Cape St. Cosme in Perry County, Missouri. In order to gain settlers for his principality, Morgan made extensive trips among the Germans of Pennsylvania, of whom he wrote to Don Diego, that these people have been a valuable acquisition "to America. . . A greater number of them than I expected to find, are Catholics." Upon his new followers the doughty Colonel impressed the fact, that they would enjoy perfect freedom in religious matters .... and would make converts of the whole country." On the 14th of February, 1789, Morgan and his followers reached the Mississippi River and landed opposite the mouth of the Ohio. Leaving the main party in what is now Mississippi County, Morgan, with a few companions, journeyed by land to St. Louis, and on his return he selected the site for the future city of New Madrid, the capital of his principality. In a letter dated New Madrid, April 14, 1789, the colonists give a very interesting account of the virgin land to which they have come, and the grand prospects before them. This circular letter in behalf of Morgan's foundation was first print- ed in the Virginia Gazette and Weekly Advertiser, of August 27, 1789. Morgan caused sufficient land for 350 farms of 320 acres each to be surveyed and to be divided among settlers, who should come on or before May 1, 1790, the settlers to take the oath of allegiance to the King of Spain, and to pay forty-eight American dollars for each farm. It was expected that every succeeding year would add at least a thousand fam- ilies to the colony. As Houck tells us : " In New Madrid lots were dedicated to the use of the Roman Catholic church and school, Episcopal church and Results of the Discord 179 school, Presbyterian and German Lutheran church and school, and Ger- man Catholic church and school." 9 The grand plan was frustrated in a very large measure by the machinations of Governor Estevan Miro, who succeeded in having the concession cancelled, and the new city put under Spanish administration. Colonel Morgan retired to his Manor Morganza in Pennsylvania. Some of the settlers moved to Little Prairie and elsewhere. Yet a steady stream of colonists, from the states beyond the Mississippi set in, especially from Vincennes and the French royalist settlement of Gallipolis. At first the new settlement was placed under the jurisdiction of Henri Peyroux, Com- mandant of Ste. Genevieve. In July 1789, Governor Miro dispatched Lieutenant Pierre Foucher with a small company of soldiers to build a fort at New Madrid and to take civil and military command of the place. New colonists came pouring in day by day. "All our Americans of Port Vincennes will go to Morgan," wrote Major Hamtramck, in 1789, and ' ' within twenty days not less than a hundred souls have passed daily to the colony." Foucher was succeeded as Commandant by Thomas Por- telle, September 1791. So far the great majority of the settlers were Creoles and French. 10 What we have written here, concerns more the rising town of New Madrid than the Catholic church established there. But Governor Estevan Miro, whilst antagonizing the founder of New Madrid, helped to found the church in the new settlement. A Catholic church and priest were consid- ered essential to the well being of any Spanish settlement. But first a priest must be had. There were two applicants for the position : Father Paul de Saint Pierre, the German Carmelite Missionary, wrote from Cahokia to his Bishop in New Orleans on May 1, 1787. "A new estab- lishment has been begun a little below the entrance of the Beautiful River. They will need a priest who knows English and German. I offer myself for this place. You may dispose of me according to your pleasure and good will." 11 The German Carmelite received the appointment, not to New Madrid, but to old Ste. Genevieve, whilst the socalled ' ' patriot priest of the West," Pierre Gibault, was called to New Madrid, where he re- ceived the appointment as pastor of the Parish church of Saint Isidore in 1793. But Gibault 's spiritual labors in New Madrid began much sooner, probably in 1789, when he left Cahokia. This Parish of New Madrid, included the dependencies of Arkansas Post and Little Prairie, which latter village was founded by Francois Le Sieur, in 1797, whilst Arkansas 9 Houck, Louis, "The Spanish Regime in Missouri," gives a re-translation from the Spanish version. The original English appeared in the "Virginia Gazette and Weekly Advertiser," August 27, 1789. >° The Catholic Germans who had been expected to come on from Pennsylvania did not respond in large numbers, ii Catholic Archives, Notre Dame. 180 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis Post dates back lo the days of Saint Cosine and his companions. Father Gibault administered the sacraments of the church in Arkansas Post as early as October 8, 1792, and signed himself as "Cure clu de la Nouvelle .Madrid," parish priest-elect of New Madrid, thai is, Ins election was not as yet confirmed by episcopal authority. But on duly 11, 1793, he firsl signs an entry of marriage, " 1*. Gilbault per nous Pretre, Cure de la Nou- velle Madrid.'" From this it follows that Father Gibault attended New Madrid and its dependencies since his departure from Cahokia in 1791. and became the first canonical pastor of New Madrid in 17!).'5. The immediate reason for Father Gibault 's change to the Spanish jurisdiction and civil allegiance is to be sought in two facts: that he was no longer welcome in the diocese of Bishop Carroll of Baltimore, whose claim to all the territory of the United States was now acknowledged, and that he was not allowed to return to his home in Canada on account of his political activities in Kaskaskia and Vincennes. An offer from Cath- olic Spain was therefore most acceptable, especially, as he knew the various older French settlements on the Spanish side of the river. It is certain that Father Gibault took the oath of allegiance to His Most Christian Majesty 12 and that he attained some real successes in his new field of labor. Spiritually, he was now under the jurisdiction of the Bishop of Louisiana and Florida, represented in Upper Louisiana by the Vicar-Gen- eral James Maxwell residing in Ste. Genevieve. As pastor he received a salary of 600 dollars from the Government, in addition to the perquisites which were fixed by royal ordinance. He succeeded in 1799 to obtain the consent of his parishioners as well as of the Intendant Morales to build a church in New Madrid, dedicated to St. Isidore. . The church was an edifice 60 feet long, 28 feet wide and 16 feet high between ground and ceiling. "The carpenter work," says the report of the commissioners, "is constructed of cypress timber, covered on the outside with planks of the same wood. It has a partition in the width for the sacristy, ten open- ings with their windows and gratings, an altar with tabernacle of cherry- wood, a picture of the Holy Virgin Mary eight feet high by five and one-half feet wide, framed in wood, a belfry with a metal bell weighing fifty pounds," which was estimated to be worth 1200 pesos. The parish residence w r as a building 21 feet by 16 feet wide, rather small according to modern ideas of comfort. It was, as Houck tells us, doubled without and within with cypress planks, the floor and ceiling and a partition wall of cypress planks, a double brick chimney, four openings with their windows and doors and gratings, a gallery in front, with floors and ceil- ings, a cellar under said house and a stairway to mount the garret. In addition to this parish residence was a kitchen 18 feet long by 15 feet wide 12 Houck, "The Spanish Regime in Missouri," vol. I, p. 336. Results of the Discord 181 and also a bake house 15 feet long and 10 feet wide and over 30 feet in circumference, with frames complete, made of brick, and a roof of car- penter work and this bake house was equipped with all the utensils necessary for baking, all valued at 120 pesos. 13 In this parochial residence, surrounded by a large garden, Father Gibault lived in ease and comfort with his colored servants well able to entertain the Vicar-General of Upper Louisiana, Father Maxwell, who would occasionally ride down from Ste. Genevieve for a brief visit, unless he himself were absent on a more or less laborious journey to his stations along the river as far as Arkansas Post to the South and Tywap- pity Bottom to the North. As Stoddard in his Louisiana informs us, the expense of building and furnishing the church was paid by the Govern- ment, although Father Maxwell insists that the well-to-do inhabitants are obliged, under the laws of the Kingdom to contribute to the construction of the church. It was a subscription sufficiently meagre as we can judge from Francisco Miranda's Report on the church furnishings he found in St. Isidore's church of New Madrid in 1805, as recorded by Houck in his Spanish Regime in Missouri. During the Spanish regime the Catholic religion was the only one tolerated in Louisiana : yet the authorities recognized a certain liberty of conscience. On March 29, 1797, the Governor Don Manuel Gayoso de Lemos issued a Proclamation from which the following is an extract : "The misconstruction of what is meant by the enjoyment of the liberty of conscience is hereby removed by explaining it precisely to be, that no individual of this government, shall be molested on account of religious principles, and that they shall not be hindered in their private meetings ; but no other public worship shall be allowed, but that generally esta- blished in all His Majestys dominions which is the Catholic religion." 14 The occasion for the proclamation Avas an incident that happened in New Madrid on June 9, 1797. An itinerant Baptist minister of the name of Hannah, had, at the request of Mr. Andrew Elliot, the U. S. Commissioner General for Determining the Boundary of the Spanish Possessions, who was then the Governor's guest, obtained permission to preach a sermon in Mr. Elliot's camp, near New Madrid, with the restriction that he should not touch on political topics. The announcement of a Protestant sermon, being a new thing in the country, drew together a very large audience. "The preacher being a weak man was extremely puffed up with the at- tentions he received on that occasion, which were more from the novelty of the case than his own merit and talent, and paved the way for a commotion which took place a few days after. . . . The minister had is Houck, op. cit., vol. II, p. 351. 182 History of the Arckdvocest of St. Louis with enthusiastic zeal, which was a little heightened by liquor, entered into religious controversy in a disorderly pari of the town, generally in- habited at that time by Irish Roman Catholics, who took offense as the manner in which he treated the tenets of their ehurch and in revenge gave him a beating. He immediately called upon the Governor, and in a presumptive manner demanded justice ; threatening at the same time to do it for himself, if his request was not complied with. The Governor, with more patience and good temper than ordinary, advised him to re- flect a few minutes, and then repeat his request, which the Preacher did in the same words, accompanied with a threat. Upon which the Governor immediately ordered him to be committed to the prison, which was with- in the Fort, and his legs to be placed in the stocks." 14 This vivid picture from the Journal of Andrew Elliot, showing that a part of Father Gibault parishioners were of the militant kind, derives additional interest from the fact that at that very time Father James Maxwell, the Vicar General, was with the Spanish Commandant at New Madrid, being described by Elliot in his Journal, as "a Clergyman of Rome, a Native of Ireland, of the name of Maxwell, a well informed liberal gentleman, who acted as interpreter." Mr. Houck 15 gives the substance of a few official letters written by Maxwell to Gibault, saying that it appears from them that the Parish Priest of New Madrid and its dependencies was altogether too lenient in the matter of demanding the usual offerings for the dispensations granted, (•specially from the proclamation of the bans, to which fees the Vicar General, or rather his Chancery, was entitled. "In one letter," writes Houck, "dated October 1801, which has been preserved in the New Madrid Archives, Father Maxwell severely reprimanded him for per- forming a ceremony between a Mr. Randall and Miss Sara Waller, the latter being a minor, without the consent of her father and mother, both being residents of the Cape Girardeau district," that is within Father Maxwell's own parish limits. From this it is evident that Father Gibault was still among the living and, at that, in New Madrid, at the close of 1801, although not in very excellent standing with his spiritual superiors. It appears from the New Madrid Records that Father Gibault was not at New Madrid after March 29, 1804, for during a period of eight months, March 19, 1804 — Nov. 28, 1804, the Commandant Juan Lavalle assists at and certifies to the marriages contracted at New Madrid. From Nov. 28, 1804 Father Leander Lusson, the Pastor of St. Charles, per- forms this office as the New Madrid Records bear witness, 10 until Decem- ber 9, 1804. From that date on until April 15, 180C>, marriages are contracted before the civil magistrate. "Elliot's Journal,'' pp. (15 and 6(5. Houck 's "History of Missouri," vol. II, pp. 302. "New Madrid Archives," vol. VIII, p. 470-487. Results of the Discord 183 This seems to be the last documentary trace we have about the storm-tossed man and servant of Holy Church. John Gilmary Shea, in his History of the Catholic Church in the United States, says that both Fathers John Olivier and Gabriel Richard had written to Bishop Carroll of Baltimore that Father Pierre Gibault, one time Vicar General of the Bishop of Quebec in the Illinois Country, had died at New Madrid in 1804. These letters are said to be in the archives of the Archdiocese of Baltimore. There are some who say that Gibault returned to Canada after 1801 or 1802, and died there probably in 1804. But this point remains doubtful. The transfer of Louisiana and with it of New Madrid, to the United States, was consummated by Laussat in behalf of France, on December 29, 1803. It may be that Father Gibault did not live to see the great change, in the preparation of which he had been such an important actor in his Kaskaskia days under General George Rogers Clark. It is even doubtful whether he would have welcomed the change to American sovereignty of what had once been the proud possession of his own race. In any case it must be remembered that Father Gibault was first and all the time an humble, laborious and enthusiastic servant of God's Kingdom, the Church, and that his chief business was not empire building, but the salvation of souls. Indeed, he had in himself but little of the warrior-patriot, as some have lovingly described him. It was through circumstances over which he had no control, but whose control he readily accepted, that this simple priest and missionary was elevated to the exalted position of one of the three founders of the Re- public in the West. 17 Father Gibault appears as the connecting link between the old glorious Jesuit mission period in Illinois and the still more glorious development of the church in the Mississippi Valley. Touching the hand of the last of the Jesuits, Father Sebastian Meurin, he trained for the priesthood that noble scion of Ste. Genevieve, Father Henri Pratte, who was to welcome to the wild but promising West, the pioneer bishop William Du Bourg and his little army of missionaries in 1818. l? Clark, Vigo and Gibault, ef. Judge Law's "Colonial History of Vineennes, ' ' p. 55. Chapter 10 THE SULPICIANS IX THE ILLINOIS COUNTRY After the Diocese of Baltimore had been officially extended to the Mississippi River, the duty of Bishop Carroll to provide priests for the long- forsaken Missions and Parishes, Cahokia, Kaskaskia, Prairie Du Rocher and Vincennes, became imperative. He was fortunate to obtain from Paris a number of very excellent members of the Sulpieian Con- gregation, some for his new seminary at Baltimore, others for the western missions. Among - the latter were, besides the future Bishops of Bardstown, Flaget and David, the Fathers Michael Levadoux, Jean Francois Rivet and Gabriel Richard. These priests were assigned as follows: Levadoux lo Cahokia, Rivet to Vincennes, Richard to Prairie du Rocher, and the secular priest, Pierre Janin, to Kaskaskia. Only Rivet and Janin had Indian Missions. The first Sulpieian to accept the position of a shepherd of souls' in the old Illinois missionary field, and, for that matter, in the United States, was the saintly Benedict Joseph Flaget. Born December 7, 1763, at Contournat, in the Auvergne, he became a member of the Congregation of St. Sulpice in November 1783, and pursued his theological studies at Issy, near Paris, under Father Gabriel Richard, as Superior. The revolution, that swept away so many of the monuments of French piety, learning and art, drove the young priest away from home to America, in company of the Sulpieian Fathers Chicoisneau and David, and the sub- deacon, Stephen Theodor Badin. The missionaries reached Philadelphia on March 29, 1792. The youthful Flaget was immediately sent as pastor to the old French settle- ment on the Wabash, Vincennes, 2 where he arrived a few days before i The Congregation of St. Sulpice was intended for Seminary work. Mis sionary activity was assigned to them at the request of Bishop Carroll. 2 Since the days of the early Jesuits the Church of Vincennes has maintained intimate relations with the French Catholics along the Mississippi. Father Mermet, the Jesuit from Kaskaskia, was its first priest. Then came the heroic Father Senat, the martyr of duty in the Chicasaw war, and a little later the Jesuits Vivier and Meurin, all members of the Illinois Mission. Father Gibault was the pastor, until his appointment to New Madrid on the Spanish side. On Bishop Du Bourg 's as- sumption of the charge of the Illinois Mission, Vincennes was thrown in for good measure, and two of his best priests, Anthony Blanc and Andrew Ferrari, were sent there to revive the faith. The town on the Wabash was named for the Sieur John Baptist Vincennes whom the Chicasaws burned to death with his friend and com- panion Father Senat in 173G. (184) The Sulpicians in the Illinois Country 185 Christmas. What ho saw and experienced there among the Indians who had returned to an almost savage life, and the Creoles who had inter- married with the Indians and had adopted many of their ways and manners, was enough to discourage any ordinary man. The church of Father Gibault, a log building, still remained, but in a dilapidated con- dition; the altar was a primitive construction of a few boards, rudely put together. Yet, the poverty and bareness of his surroundings did not dishearten Father Flaget, though it touched him deeply, reminding him of Bethlehem and its manger. What hurt him much more was the coldness and indifference of his people, of whom only twelve could lie moved to approach Holy Communion during the Christmas festivities. Seeing that the way of converting the old was through the plastic hearts of their children, he established a school, in which he taught the rudi- ments of learning and the principles and practices of religion. A goodly number of the parishioners, Indian and French Creoles, were won over to the almost forgotten Christian practices. Hut no less did he endeavor to improve the social condition of these poor neglected and persecuted people. He had looms made, and taught the women the art of weaving; he encouraged agriculture and sought to instill habits of industry in the half -savage hunters and trappers. During Father Flaget 's stay at Vincennes, the smallpox visited the people of the town, and the Indians in the neighboring villages, and continued its ravages, though intermittently, for a whole year. With full knowledge of the dangers he incurred, he waited on the afflicted, administered the sacraments and buried the dead. Many among the Miamis and other Indians received Baptism on their death-bed. With such a lonely life in the wilderness, with no priestly companion within reach, and deprived of all the comforts of cultured society the young missionary bore the "burdens of the day and the heats thereof" most manfully. When he fell sick in October 1793, his vigorous consti- tution and his never-failing confidence in God soon restored him. But he was destined for higher things, and at the call of his Superiors, he left Vincennes for Baltimore at the end of April 1795. The disastrous war with the savages at last brought the United States government, not so much to a realization of its duty towards the poor children of forest and prairie, but rather to a clearer estimate of the advantages to be gained by bringing them under religious in- fluences. President Washington recommended to Congress the adoption of a more helpful treatment of the Indians. Bishop Carroll at once offered the services of Father Rivet, and the offer was accepted. A commission was issued to him as "Missionary to the Indians," with an annual allow- 18(i History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis since of $200.00. Father Rivet immediately set out for the .Mission of St. Francis Xavier near Vincennes, and arrived there June 12, 1795. 3 Father Pierre Janin received a similar commission, and came to Kaskaskia in Octoher of the same year. Both found, what Father Rivet had expected from the start, "only trouble, privation and the duty of making every kind of sacrifice." Through the disastrous war tiie Indians had become savages once more, with the vices of the whites added to their old ones. The French Catholics were apathetic, and the government officials neglected to pay the yearly allowances. Father Janin soon re- signed Ids commission as "Missionary to the Indians" and Pastor of Kaskaskia, to go to St. Louis on the Spanish side. Father Gabriel Richard attended the place from Prairie du Rocher. Fever attacked the new- comers to the American Bottoms. "So far I have had only three attacks of the fever, wrote Father Levadoux from Cahokia, "but they have left me so weak, that I can scarcely keep from falling at every step." "Father Rivet at Vincennes has been more fortunate in tins respect. But his Indians were all in winter quarters, and will not be back for a few months." "One great drawback, is that I am still without means, having no interpreter of my own, not knowing the language, having no opportu- nity to learn it, and being scarcely able to vegetate with the meagre salary given me by the United States. We have not even received a cent of the first quarter of that salary, now that the fourth quarter is due." "The Governor tells us that we have been forgotten." 4 Discouraging as the care of the Indians was, the experiences Father Rivet had with the French were still more heartrending: "Notwith- standing all my care in a village composed of one hundred and four Catholic families, which number about three hundred, or three hundred and fifty communicants, I had only eighty-eight persons who presented themselves at the tribunal of Penance and forty two at the Holy Table, although my indulgence has been almost excessive." 3 The good Father begs his Bishop to send his people a pastoral letter, especially in regard to "the necessity of sending the children to Catechism, and not to leave them, until the age of thirteen or fourteen, in almost absolute ignorance of all their duties of religion, to take them out of the hands of the priests, as soon as they haw made their First Communion. " fi Another common vice, the Father most bitterly condems, is "the uncontrollable passion for nocturnal dances." The population of our villages is made up of 3 "Rev. John Rivet," by Camillus 1*. Maes in "Ecclesiastical Review." vol. V. July and August. •* Ibidem, p. 40. 5 Ibidem, p. It. Ibidem, p. 45. The Sulpicians in the Illinois Country 187 people from all over the world, ' ' 7 adds Father Rivet as one of the causes of this almost universal demoralization. Father Rivet, however regarded himself as primarily a missionary appointed for the savages, and as such he had very noteworthy success. As to Father Rivet's zeal for the salavation of his poor Indian children, Bishop Carroll bears ample testimony: "Father Rivet visits the neigh- boring- Indians and applies himself incessantly in fulfilling the object of his appointment, and disposing them to maintain a friendly temper to- wards the United States. He is indefatigable in instructing them in the principles of Christianity, and not without success, which however, would be much greater if the traders could be restrained from spoiling the fruits of his labors by the introduction and sale of spirituous liquors. In the discharge of his useful occupations, M. Rivet has undergone much distress. The Indians afford nothing for his subsistence ; on the contrary, he is often obliged to share the little he possesses with them." 8 "God rewarded his zeal," says Father Rivet's biographer, "with abundant spiritual fruit." The Vincennes Registers of Baptisms and Marriages record the wonderful results of his apostolic labors among the Pottowatomies. The other roaming tribes of the plains of the Wabash were not overlooked : Miamis, Shawnees, Charaguis, Piankeshaws, Ouias, Sioux and Kaskaskies, all contributed their share to the harvest of souls. ' ' 9 The infidel writer, Volney, on his tour through the West, visited Father Rivet at Vincennes and expressed himself as "well-pleased with the per- sonality of the learned, well-bred and very kind gentleman." He has special praise for Father Rivet's "self-sacrificing efforts for the education of his flock." On October 14, 1802, Father Rivet alludes to the changes that were going on beyond the Mississippi: "Governor Harrison has given me a hint, that the Government may need my services in Louisiana, whence most of the priests leave, to go within the lines of the domain of the Spanish King (Florida), who offers to continue their pension to all who locate there . . . During my last journey I went to St. Louis, and everybody expressed a desire to have me there. It is probable that the two shores of the Mississippi will form one and the same government with the region where I reside, and in that case, Governor Harrison will be strongly importuned by the people of the other shore, to send me there. Alas, if they knew what I am they would not go to so much trouble." 10 7 Ibidem, p. 47. Among Father Kivet 's many other accomplishments we may mention his skill in writing Latin verse. He often exchanged poetic lucubrations with Father Stephen Badin. 8 Letter to Samuel Dexter, Secretary of War, Sept. 15, 1800. 9 "Rev. John Rivet," by C. P. Maes, p. 50. We preserve Father Rivet's spelling of these Indian names. lo Ibidem, p. 111. 188 History of tin Archdiocese of St. Louis But Father Rivet's health was breaking fast, and his end was, no doubt, accelerated by extraordinary austerities, as "Sleeping on rough boards covered with a worn-out cloak." Shortly after New Year's Day of 1804 he felt that death was nigh. He sent word to his nearest neighbor, Father Donatien Olivier, at Prairie du Rocher, to come and administer to him the last rites of the Church. Anticipating his com- ing he wrote out his confession. But Father Olivier was far away, and the dying man sealed his written confession and addressed it to his brother priest. Father Olivier arrived at Vincennes three days after Father Rivet's death. "He died as he had lived, extremely poor and extremely regretted by his parishioners," wrote Father Gabriel Richard, the companion of former days. 11 Father Michael Levadoux was one of the companions of Father Nagot on the journey to Baltimore in 1791. A year or so after his arrival he and Father Gabriel Richard were sent by Bishop Carroll to the French settlements along the Mississippi. Father Flaget on his way to Vincennes met them at the Falls of the Ohio, now, Louisville,. Father Levadoux took up his abode at Cahokia, whilst Richard went to Prairie du Rocher. After the recall of Father Flaget, Father Rivet was sent to Vincennes, and a secular priest, Pierre Janin, to Kaskas- kia. Father Levadoux was appointed Vicar General of the district. The Sulpician, John Dilhet, in his Memoir "On the church in the diocese of the United States," says: "M. Levadoux went there (Cahokia), by order 1 of his superiors, the Bishop of Baltimore and M. Nagot, Superior of the Seminary of St. Sulpice at Baltimore. He built a splendid church there, in the vicinity, I do not know where. M. Olivier succeeded him." 12 This testimony of a brother in religion is sufficiently perplex- ing. Yet it contains a grain of certain truth; the fact that the church at Cahokia was built, at least in part, by Vicar-General Levadoux. As Father Dilhet resided at Detroit with Fathers Levadoux and Richard, he must have had his information from the best sources. What Father Dilhet probably meant, was that Father Levadoux had been sent to the district of Cahokia, and that he built a church there, at a point un- known to the writer. When Father Levadoux was changed from Caho- kia to Detroit in 1796, to be succeeded, after an interval of a few years, by Father John Olivier, Father Gabriel Richard attended to the wants of the people of Cahokia, and also to the construction of the church begun by Father Levadoux. Certain it is that the edifice was blessed in 1799 by Vicar-General Rivet, Pastor of Vincennes, who also said ii Ibidem, p. 121. 12 Jean Dilhet "Etat De L'Eglise Catholique ou Diocese Des Etats-Unis De L'Amerique Septentrionale, " Washington, D. C, 1922. Translated and annotated by the Kev. Patrick William Browne, S. T. D. The Sulpicians in the Illinois Country 189 the first mass within its walls. This building, still in good condition, though no longer used for church purposes, is the noblest memorial of the Sulpician Fathers in the Mississippi Valley. The first Church of the Holy Family at Cahokia built by Father St. Cosme at the beginning of the eighteenth century, was probably consumed by fire in 1735. Soon after this disaster the Seminary of Quebec sent Father Nicholas Laurens with 25,000 livres for the purpose of restoring what had been lost or damaged. At this time, no doubt, the second church was erected, which served the parish until that fate- ful day in November 1762, when Father Forget Du Verger, the last of the Seminary priests, sold all of the mission property, and returned to France. The people of Cahokia were now deprived of everything per- taining to divine worship, except a bell, a monstrance, a chalice and paten and a missal printed in 1668. A house had to be rented in the village where visiting priests might say mass. Father Paul de Saint Pierre, the Carmelite representative of the strenuous life, came to Ca- hokia in 1786. The people were delighted with their pastor, and built for him a parsonage at a cost of 5,000 livres and started a movement to replace the church, that had meanwhile fallen to pieces. In 1789, how- ever. Father de Saint Pierre left Cahokia for Ste. Genevieve, and the building project lapsed for a time. 13 The "splendid church" must have been begun and almost brought to completion by Father Levadoux, as Father Richard also departed for Detroit in May 1797. Building operations were slow and expensive in those days. The finishing touches were applied under Father Donatien Olivier 's regime, so that the build- ing could be dedicated to divine service by the last of the Sulpicians in the Illinois country, Father John Rivet of Vincennes. This would reconcile the apparent discrepancy in the statements, that the church of Cahokia was built in 1789 and in 1799. The first date marks the inception of the work, the second, however, its com- pletion and dedication. Father Paul de Saint Pierre, the Carmelite, gave the first impulse. Father Levadoux set the work in motion, and Father Richard brought it to completion, whilst Father Rivet blessed the splendid structure under the rectorship of Father John Olivier. As a pleasant conclusion to this tedious account of early building opera- tions, we would subjoin the clear and accurate description of the Old Church at Cahokia published some years ago by one of its former pastors, the Rev. Robert Hynes. "This church is built upon a stone foundation, 31 x 74 feet. The walls are hewn walnut logs placed upright six inches apart and leaning is On Father Paul de Saint Pierre, ef. "The Catholic Historical Review," vol. V, p. 195, ss. 190 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis in from the perpendicular about eight inches. The sides oi! the logs facing each other are beveled to a depth of two inches to receive and hold the mixture of stone and mortar with which the interstices are filled. The logs are securely mortised into heavy timbers below and above, and braced at each angle of the building. Not a nail was used in the entire structure, but huge wooden pegs were employed where needed. The roof timbers are oak, squared to the dimensions of 4x4 inches and originally were covered with cypress clapboards. Wide sycamore boards cover the floor which slopes gently from the front wall to the altar rail with a fall of six inches. Originally the church had no sacristy, but this need was supplied in 1833 in the form of a small chapel projecting from the north wall. In the same year a correspond- ing chapel was built out from the south wall to accommodate the organ and choir. Later, in 1840, a larger sacristy was added to the rear of the building, and a confessional was placed in the north chapel. The church as it came from the hands of the builders 119 years ago is sub- stantially intact today. Additions have been made, indeed, but prac- tically nothing of the original building has been removed." 14 And now we come to consider the most remarkable man of all the Sulpicians that served the church in the Illinois country, Father Gabriel Richard. 'Tis true, this truly great and many-sided man spent only six years of a long and eventful career in the Illinois Missions. Com- ing to Baltimore from his college in France in 1792, he was immediately sent to Kaskaskia, which post he held until May 1795, when Father Pierre Janin, the Missionary to the savages, took charge. After Janin's early departure for a new field, Father Gabriel returned to Kaskaskia, officiating there until the advent of Father Donatien Olivier in 1799. In Kaskaskia he lived among the ruins of former grandeur. Many of the houses were without roof and doors. The better part of the Creoles had migrated to S%. Louis. Fort Chartres lay deserted, and its mighty ramparts were falling piece by piece into the Mississippi. St. Anne's Church of New Chartres was no more. The Illinois Indians, that had formed the two flourishing missions of Kaskaskia, were re- duced to a pitiful remnant. 15 All was desolation and despair. "The people at this post are the worst in all Illinois;" he writes to Bishop Carroll "there is no religion among them, scarcely anyone attending mass even on Sunday; intemperance, debauchery and idle- ness are supreme." Elsewhere, however, he received better encourage- i-i "Illinois Catholic Historical Review," vol. I, p. 459. 15 In consequence of the murder of the great Chief Pontiac by an Illinois Indian at Cahokia, the greater part of the Illinois tribes were exterminated. There was nothing left of the Tamarois Mission at this time, and very little of that of the Immaculate Conception at Kaskaskin. The Sulpicians in the Illinois Country 191 merit. "I am tolerably well satisfied," he writes, "With my little village of Prairie clu Roeher, although grave scandals are occasionally witnessed there. My chief consolation are from five or six English families, who live ten or fifteen miles from this place. They are surrounded by others who are Protestants but who would be easily led into the Church if I could speak the English language with greater facility." 18 Yet Father Richard labored and prayed, knowing that the result was in the hands of God. The Parishes of Kaskaskia and Prairie du Roeher remained in his care from 1793 to 1798. On August 1st, 1797 he inscribed his name in the Baptismal Record of Ste. Genevieve as "Cure de Prairie du Roeher." In September 1798, however, he became Vicar- General and Parish priest of St. Anne's, Detroit, in succession to Father Levadoux, who was recalled to Baltimore. Father Gabriel Richard was a many-sided genius. Priest, pro- fessor, founder of a university, editor, publisher of the first Bible print- ed in the Northwest, French and English scholar with a good knowledge of Spanish, German, Italian and the Algonquin languages, promoter of trade, and introducer of wool-carding and spinning in the Northwest, and the only member of Congress, that was, at the same time, a priest in good standing. Of course, the missionary in the Illinois country did not have the opportunity of showing all the facets of his personality : the wider field of Detroit was necessary for their development. Yet, he was always the man to recognize an opportunity when it presented itself, and to realize it in a thorough manner. He had his sorrows, too, and disappointments, and even persecutions to bear ; yet he met them all like a man and hero. Father Gabriel Richard is, as Dr. Guilday justly says, "the greatest name in the missionary annals of the Sulpi- cians." Lanman's Directory of the United States Congress says of him: "He was a Roman Catholic priest and a man of learning .... During his pastorate of St. Ann's Church in Detroit it became his duty, according to the Roman Catholic religion, to excommunicate one of his parishioners, who had been divorced from his wife. For this he was prosecuted for defamation of character, which resulted in a verdict being given against him for one thousand dollars. This money the priest could not pay, and as his parishioners were poor French settlers they could not pay it for him, and he was thrown into prison. While confined in the common jail, with little hope of ever being liberated, he was elected a delegate to Congress, and went from his prison cell in the wilds of Michigan, to his seat on the floor of Congress." ie Richard to Carrol], January 24, 1796. Girardin, J. A., "Life and Times of Gabriel Richard," in "Michigan Pioneer Collections," vol. I, p. 482. 192 History of th( Archdiocese of St. Louis The testimony contained in the Journal of Bishop Joseph-Octave Plessis of Quebec, 1816, mingles generous praise with a Little quiet sar- casm : "This ecclesiastic (M. Gabriel Richard) is moreover, thoroughly estimable on account of his regularity, of the variety of his knowledge, and especially of an activity, of which it is difficult to form an idea. He has the talent of doing, almost simultaneously, ten entirely different tilings. Provided with newspapers (gazettes) well informed on all polit- ical questions, ever ready to argue on religion, when the occasion presents itself, and thoroughly learned in theology, he reaps his hay, gathers the fruit of his garden, manages a fishery fronting his lot, teaches mathematics to one young man, reading to another, devotes time to mental prayer, establishes a printing press, confesses all his people, imports carding and spinning wheels and looms to teach the women of his parish how to work, leaves not a single act of his parochial reg- ister unwritten, invents an electric machine, goes on sick calls at a very great distance, writes letters to and receives others from all parts, preaches on every Sunday and holy-day both lengthily and learnedly, enriches his library, spends whole nights without sleep, walks for whole days, loves to converse, receives company, teaches catechism to his young parishioners, supports a girls' school, under the management of a few female teachers of his own choosing, whom he directs like a religious community whilst he gives lessons in plain-song to young boys assembled in a school he has founded, leads a most frugal life, and is in good health, as fresh and able at the age of fifty, as one usually is at thirty. Such is the abridged portrait of this more than ordinary man ; extreme- ly appreciated by the Bishop of Quebec and his traveling companions, but having against him the great majority of his parishioners; entirely set against him and several of whom, in their self-conceit and folly, would prefer remaining without a priest to having that one." 17 Certainly we Catholics of the Mississippi Valley have every rea- son to hold in reverence and love one of our precious heirlooms, the memory of Father Gabriel Richard, and his Sulpician associates, in Cahokia, Kaskaskia, Prairie du Rocher and Vincennes. From 1793 to 1798 the names of Rivet, Levadoux and Richard occur in the church records of each of the four parishes, as if they had re- garded them as one religious establishment, each member of the com- munity, however, residing in his own proper station. As a beautiful trait of the earnest and lovable character of these Sulpician mission- aries, we would instance their daily spiritual reunion at the altar. When i" "American Catholic Historical Researches," vol. XXII, p. 224. After the burning of Detroit, Father Richard was greatly instrumental in the work of re- building the city. St. Anne's Church was removed to a more favorable locality. The troubles with the people of St. Anne's culminated in an interdict by Bishop Flaget. The Sulpicians in the Illinois Country 193 entering- on their widely dispersed missions they had arranged among themselves that, day by day, they would devote the selfsame hour to prayer and meditation in common, just as if they were assembled in their far away community chapel. Separated in body, yet united in spirit, they would approach the throne of God as faithful in all things, giving thus a fine illustration of the scriptural saying: "0 quam bonum et quam jucundum est fratres habitare in unum. " After Father Rivet's death, Feb. 1804, there were no more Sul- picians in the Illinois missions, until Bishop Flaget of Bardstown began to exercise spiritual jurisdiction over half of the Illinois country, soon to introduce his brother Sulpician, Louis William Valentine Du Bourg. to the other half, west of the river, as their Bishop, and immediately to relinquish to his dear friend the care, if not the possession, of his own half forever. 18 The secular priests that were chosen to fill the parishes in succes- sion to the Sulpicians, were the brothers Olivier, John and Donatien, natives of Nantes, France. They arrived in the Illinois country in Feb- ruary 1799, John going to Cahokia and Donatien to Kaskaskia and Prairie du Rocher. When Father Francis Savine journeyed from Canada down the Ohio in company with Bishop Flaget in May, 1811, he was told to go to Cahokia, as Father John Olivier had retired to New Orleans to become the chaplain of the Ursulines. From 1817 to 1827 Father Donatien is resident pastor of Prairie du Rocher, attend- ing Kaskaskia once or twdce a month. This noble priest's character is beautifully sketched by Bishop Spalding in his Life of Bishop Flaget. "The Rev. Donatien Olivier was one among the most* pious, zealous and efficient priests who ever labored in the missions of the Mississippi Valley. He was universally esteemed and beloved. By the French Catholics he was reverenced as a saint. His name is still held in benedic- tion among them. He was for many years Vicar-General of the Bishop of Baltimore, for all the missions extending over the present states of Indiana and Illinois. He usually resided, it appears, at Prairie du Rocher; but he visited Kaskaskia, Cahokia, Vincemies and the other Catholic settlements. He was admirable for his child-like simplicity and unaffected piety, which traits he continued to exhibit in the midst of his apostolic labors, till old age compelled him to abandon the field and seek solace and prepare for death in retirement. He died on the i 8 At the coming of Bishop Du Bourg to St. Louis, Bishop Flaget requested thai the far western part of his diocese, Illinois and a part of Indiana, be provided for from St. Louis, and his request was granted. This private arrangement was made permanent, at least in regard to western Illinois, by Roman decree in 1834, to remain a part of St. Louis diocese until the erection of the diocese of Chicago in 1843. Vol. 1-7 194 History of the Archdiocese of SI. Louis 29th of January, 1S41, at the Seminary of the Barrens, in Missouri, at the advanced age <>f ninety-five years." 19 Father Francis Louis Savine, who served as pastor of Cahokia from 1812 to 1817 and incidentally attended the forsaken church of St. Louis so regularly during those years, that he was considered by many as its pastor, acted in Cahokia under the ordinary, and in St. Louis, under the delegated powers < of Bishop Benedict Flaget of Bardstown, Ken- tucky. One of the chroniclers of St. Louis, Judge Wilson Primm, who seems to have caught the inspiration from Bishop Rosati's historical interest, gives us a slight pen-picture of Father Francis Savine, the friend of his early days: "Priest Savine was the last of the Canadian Mission sent to this region of country by the Bishop of Quebec. There are many now living who remember "le pcre Savine" with perfect distinctness. He was a man of fine presence, of amiable disposition, zealous in the performance of his duties, and especially kind to the poor and those in distress. There was no tearless eye in his congre- gation when he bade them adieu. The old Creoles of today still hold him in pleasant remembrance." The good Sulpician missionaries had not labored in vain. There was a distinct revival of religion and culture in the old French vil- lages along the borders of the Mississippi. We get a glimpse of the new life rising from the old in many a passing remark of friends and foes. As Father Gabriel Richard found spiritual comfort and encourage- ment in the five or six English families of staunch Catholic faith and practice, so Father Levadoux and, after him, Father Olivier and Savine were upheld and cheered in their ceaseless struggle with infidelity and supine indifference by the bright example of Nicholas Jarrot of the Mansion House at Cahokia. Living under the shadow of the church — the oldest in Illinois that is still in existence — Major Jarrot 's life was an exemplary in church duties and devotion as that of the priest. He and Mme. Jarrot always preceded the family procession in going to and from mass on the Sab- bath. 19 "Sketches of the Life, Times and Character of the Rt. Rev. Benedict Joseph Flaget, First Bishop of Louisville," by M. J. Spalding, D. D., 1852. Governor Reynolds, who had personal knowledge of Father Olivier, said of him in his "My Own Times " : " One of the ancient pioneer clergymen was the celebrated Mr. Olivier of Prairie du Rocher, Randolph County. This reverend divine was a high dignitary of the Roman Catholic Church for more than half a century, lie acquired a great reputation for his sanctity and holiness, and sonic believed him to lie possessed of the power to perform small miracles, to which lie made no pretensions." The Sulpicians in the Illinois Country 195 With him, as with most of the Catholic French and Creoles of that day, religion did not mean a soured spirit nor a saddened heart. The joy of life still had an attraction for them, and they showed their good sense in countering the manifold ills of existence with a light heart. Not that they did not go too far at times; not that they were all perfect specimens of Christian men and women. Yet, under the circumstances of frontier life, it was good for them to be cheerful, and it may be called a wonder, that they did not sink completely under the burdens of op- pression and contempt. "The French in many ways were lenient masters .... Their wives spun linsey for the negroes' clothes, and they were taught the Catechism. One day the Jarrot family heard the cook's baby crying down in the basement. Ortance (the eldest daughter) went to inves- tigate and found that the cook had run away and abandoned the child. Ortance named him Louis and took charge of the boy. So kind was his supervision, that when the slave became old enough to obtain his freedom, he did not want to go. Later, on the wedding night of Maria Brackett, daughter of Ortance, in 1841, Louis took a vacation from his job on a Mississippi steamboat, came back to Cahokia and cooked the wedding breakfast. After performing this act of devotion, he returned to his work, and that very night the steamboat blew up." 21 It seems appropriate here to give a summary account of the visit which Bishop Flaget, the saintly Sulpician and friend of Levadoux, Richard, Rivet, the Oliviers, and Savine, in 1814, paid to the parishes and missions over which they once held spiritual sway. Though his jurisdiction did not extend beyond the Mississippi River he gladly accepted the invitation of Dr. Du Bourg, the administrator of Lou- isiana, to visit the parishes and missions on the Missouri side as well. On May 25 he started on horseback for Vincennes and reached it on the third day, tired, but happy at seeing his old flock, headed by Father Olivier. On May 30 he visited the grave of Father Rivet and sang the "Libera" over it. Devoting several days to the preparation of the Confirmandi he administered the sacrament to eighty-six persons. He preached in English as well as in French to the great satisfaction of the Americans. On June the 14th, he and Father Olivier set out for the Mississippi. They were escorted by a company of French Rangers. On the 18th they arrived at Cahokia, where they found Father Savine, ' ' holding the handle of a skillet to make an omelet. ' ' The bishop found everything in good order. He confirmed one hundred and eighteen persons. The good people of Cahokia conducted their bishop to the banks of the Mississippi, which he crossed in a canoe, with no campanion -i ' ' The Mansion House at Cahokia, ' ' passim 196 History of the Arckdiocesi of 8t. Louis l)iit the oarsman. No public reception awaited him. At the confirma- tion services on July 4th he was attended by Father Savine and the Father Prior, Joseph Marie Dunand. The ladies of the city presented the prelate with a fine cross and mitre. On the 8th of July he departed for Florissant, where the entire population turned out to receive him; on the 11th he crossed the Missouri River, sitting in an armchair placed in a canoe, decorated with flowers. On the other side he visited Dard- enne. where he confirmed one hundred persons, one of whom was 1015 and another 115 years old. He arrived at St. Charles on the 18th, and on the 21 st went to Portage de Sioux, confirming fifty-four persons. Then he returned to St. Charles and found a parish that had been at war with its pastor, Father Dunand, for two years: his earnest words brought peace and joy to all. He confirmed sixty-five persons, and on August 3 retraced his steps to St. Louis. "This congregation is in a state of extreme indifference," he wrote, "yet some young people presented themselves for confession and reval- idation of their marriages. Seventy-two persons were confirmed. Gov- ernor William Clark, the former associate of Meriwether Lewis in the discovery of the Columbia River, asked the bishop to baptize three of his children. On August 14th the bishop crossed the river to Illinois, where a large escort of horsemen and carriages received him and form- ed a procession to Cahokia. On the 2nd he departed for Prairie du Kocher to confirm a class of sixty-five. Though suffering from a fever, the prelate visited Kaskaskia on the 14th of September, where he set down the following words of praise: "The church is superb for the country; its length is eighty feet, its width forty feet. The evening was spent in blessing the good people." He confirmed one hundred and ten persons. On the 21st he went to Ste. Genevieve, where he was received with the usual honors. He preached strongly against balls, "to the great astonishment of dancers," and administered confirma- tion to three hundred and sixty-one persons. On October 5 he visited the Barrens, an American Catholic settlement, attended by Father Dunand from Florissant, and there confirmed forty-five persons. On his return to Ste. Genevieve he preached to the negroes, of whom there were about five hundred in the town and vicinity. Finding that mar- riage was not common among these poor slaves, he threatened their masters with excommunication, unless they afforded their servants every facility of lawful marriage. On the 27th of October he rejoined Father Olivier at Prairie du Rocher, spending a few days of charming solitude after so much distraction. November 3rd he returned to Kaskaskia, whence lie took his departure for home by way of Vincennes. He was escorted by sixteen Creoles on horseback. The party reached Vincennes on the lL'th of November. From the fulness of his great heart, the The Sulpicians in the Illinois Country 197 Bishop wrote to his brother in France: "I have just returned from a mission where I had remained for seven months. It is situated among the French living along the banks of the impetuous Mississippi and the muddy Missouri. I was greatly surprised to find more than ten thousand Catholics, attended by two priests only, one of whom is seventy years old ; the other, on account of his constitution, unable to travel on horse- back. I cannot describe to you the pleasure it gave to these old-time French people to see me and to listen to me. Many irregularities may be found among them, it is true, but their faith is still strong. What sincere feeling they testified, and how many conversions were wrought ! Although I could visit but half of the population, and only confirmed those who had made their first communion, I had the consolation of confirming more than twelve hundred, An episcopal throne was made for me out of beaver skins, decorated with jewels lent by the women." 22 The next time Bishop Flaget came to visit St. Louis, he brought the newly appointed Bishop Louis William Valentine Du Bourg, a Sulpician like himself, under whose self-sacrificing devotion the Church was destined to take firm root in the soil of the west and grow into a mighty tree of perennial vitality and grandeur. '*'*■ Spalding's "Life of Bishop Benedict Flaget," pp. 129-142, passim. Chapter 11 VI CAR GENERAL JAMES MAXWELL Six years had elapsed since the western part of Louisiana with New Orleans was transferred to the dominion of Spain, ere a change occurred in the spiritual administration of the country. But then the changes came thick and fast. In 1722 the jurisdiction of the diocese of Santiago de Cuba was established over this region, under Bishop Joseph Echeveria, with Bishop Cyrillo de Barcelona as Vicar General, residing in New Orleans. In 1789 the diocese was divided, and the northern part, including Louisiana, was placed under Bishop Joseph de Trespalacios of St. Christopher de Havana with Bishop Cyrillo as his auxiliary. But the latter was not long after recalled to his monastery. In 1793, on April 25th, that part of the diocese of Havana, that Avas situated on the continent, Louisiana and the Ploridas, was erected into a separate diocese under that name and received its first Bishop in the person of Louis Penalver y Cardenas, a native of Havana. It had been the policy of the Spaniards from the coming of Count O'Reilly to send over Irish soldiers and civillians for the defense and upbuilding of Louisiana. Hence Irish priests who had made their studies in Spain, especially at the University of Salamanca, were in great favor with the authorities. The necessity of Irish priests became even more pronounced, when English colonists from the United States crossed over to Louisiana in greater numbers. They were welcome, but it was expected of them, that they would become Catholics, if they were not Catholics before. Irish priests with Spanish training were justly considered the proper persons for this w r ork of conversion. Fathers Thomas Hassett and Patrick Walsh, the future Grand Vicars of Bishop Penalver, were among this number. They also received a larger salary from the King, than the other Missionaries and parish priests; six hundred dollars per annum, whilst the Spanish curates could claim only four hundred. The only one of this numerous class of Irish Priests from Salamanca to find his way to Upper Louisiana, was the Rev. James Maxwell, pastor of Ste. Genevieve, and Vicar-General for Upper Louisiana, who, living under three successive governments, the Spanish, the French and the United States, was also known under the strange designations Don Diego Maxwell and M. Jacques Maxwell. James Maxwell was an Irishman, probably born in Dublin, about 1742, as he states in his will that his brothers and sisters were living in Ireland, and particularly, his brother, Robert Maxwell, in Dublin. But (198) / g 0?ifasi^7^ /a £&ys OZz^z^k -*C*— ? ^ZS*-^??^^^ Cotfc* SIGNATURES OF PRIESTS OF STE. GENEVIEVE Vicar General James Maxwell 199 whether James was born in Ireland or of Irish immigrants in Spain, he certainly made his theological studies at the Irish College in the celebrat- ed University of Salamanca, and was there raised to the holy priesthood. Where he spent the first years of his ministry, we cannot say, probably, in Spain, in order to make himself familiar with the Spanish language. Others had found similar employment. A friend of his, Don Thomas O 'Ryan, was chaplain of honor to the king of Spain and Confessor to the Queen. In 1794 however, Maxwell was engaged by the government for the American Mission, 1 and received the appointment as Vicar General of the Bishop of Louisiana, 2 signed by Eugenio de Llaguno, November 2, 1794, Bishop Penalver y Cardenas had taken possession of his episcopal seat, New Orleans, on July 17th, 1795, and on August 2nd he began the discharge of his episcopal functions. The Bishop appointed Father Max- well as Parish Priest of Ste. Genevieve in Upper Louisiana, in place of Father de Saint Pierre. He arrived in Ste. Genevieve in April 1796. The Pastor de Saint Pierre was then absent from home, probably in New Orleans on his return-trip from Baltimore. Father Maxwell, in a brief letter, expressed his regret at being deprived of the honor of making his acquaintance. Maxwell calls Ste. Genevieve "my Parish." For a time Father Maxwell may have resided in the neighboring village of New Bourbon, until the old pastor, Paul de Saint Pierre, could effect his departure for the South, where he wasi destined to administer to the spiritual wants of the ancient parish of Iberville until October 15th, 1826. Father James Maxwell must have been a very able and lovable man. "The Bishop of Salamanca had great confidence in him and brought him to the notice of the King of Spain. "Ellicot, who met him at New Madrid on his way down the Mississippi, says that he was "a well-informed, liberal gentleman." 3 In the French Life of Bishop Flaget he is described as "a learned and practical Irish Catholic Priest. ' ' It was hoped by the Spanish authorities, that he would convert the many American settlers in the Spanish Dominion to the Catholic Religion. This of course, Father Maxwell, did not and could not accomplish ; yet our sketch of his life will show, that he was indeed, as Houck styles him, "a very active and enterprising man," as a priest and educator, as a business man, and as a real force in political life. In 1 The University of Salamanca was under the immediate control of the Bishop who also bestowed the degrees in the name of the Pope and the King. The Irish College was only one of the numerous colleges affiliated with the University. There is a picture of the Courtyard at the Irish College in the Catholic Encyclopedia Art. Salamanca. 2 In virtue of the union of Church and State, the Spanish King claimed the right of appointing the bishops and also minor clergymen, subject to the approval of the Church authorities. 3 Ellicots Journal, p. 32, quoted by Houck, " Historv of Missouri," vol. II, p. 305. 200 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis fact, Father James Maxwell must be regarded as one of the founders of our statehood in Missouri. Father Maxwell was above all things a true priest, and for that reason the difficulty of the work he was sent out to do, made a special appeal to his courage and determination. The state of religion in the vast district now placed under his general supervision as Vicar-General, was deplorable indeed. In 1799 Bishop Penalver wrote: "The emigrants from the western part of the United States and the toleration of our govern- ment have introduced into this colony a gang of adventurers who have no religion and acknowledge no God, and they have made the morals of our people much worse, by intercourse with them in trade." "Such too, is the case with the district of Illinois and the adjacent territory in which there has been a remarkable introduction of those adventurers. This evil, in my opinion, can be remedied only by not per- mitting the slightest American settlement to be made at the points already designated, nor on any part of the Red River." 4 For the spiritual and moral advancement of the members of the Church and sanctification of their spiritual Fathers, Bishop Penalver had on December 21, 1795, issued an "Instruction" for their government in which he decreed, among other things, that "it will become them so to walk, that neither their gravity render them odious, nor undue familiarity contemptible : let them visit rarely and endeavor that, in most cases, it be for the discharge of their ministry." He then enjoined on them the duty of residence in their parishes, promptness in administering the sacraments and visiting the sick to prepare them for death ; to use brotherly correc- tion in the case of scandals, reporting obstinate cases to the authorities and the Bishop; to maintain friendly relations with the governors and commandants; to be watchful that the royal revenues be paid; not to exercise the ministry beyond the limits of his parish ; to report those failing to fulfil their Easter duties; not to neglect the catechism instruc- tion, on the ground that there are public schools. The Blessed Sacrament was to be exposed only on Corpus Christi and its Octave, on Quinquagesima Sunday and the two days following, and on the third Sunday of every month. Twenty wax candles were to be lighted on these occasions. Priests carrying Holy Communion to sick persons at a distance, in the country were to go on horseback, with sur- plice and stole, bareheaded, the Blessed Sacrament in a reliquary, in a bag hung around the neck by a cord, two attendants with lanterns and an umbrellino." 5 4 Cf. Bishop Penalver 's long letter of 1799 as quoted by Shea in his "Life and Times of Archbishop Carroll," p. 579, ss. • r > Bishop Pofialver 's instruction. Vicar General James Maxwell 201 The Bishop 's zeal did not rest with these instructions, but moved him to make a number of episcopal visitations in the diocese. He found, how- ever, that the three parishes, of Upper Louisiana, New Madrid, Ste Genevieve and St. Louis, were far beyond his reach and, just like Bishop Cyrillo, failed to pay them the promised visit. The duty of carrying out Bishop Pefialver's regulations in Upper Louisiana, therefore, devolved on his Vicar-General. James Maxwell. The difficulty, almost hopelessness, of the task must have dawned on the consciousness of the Bishop when he learnt of the great extent and isola- tion of the Parishes and the small number of priests attending them. The pastors established in Vicar General Maxwell's district were, as we shall see, Father Ledru at St. Louis, Father Lusson at St. Charles and Father Paul de Saint Pierre in Ste. Genevieve, though even then appoint- ed to Iberville in the South. Father Gibault had not, as yet arrived at New Madrid, but was expected there. Beyond the river, in the diocese of Bishop Carroll of Baltimore, there were, at Vincennes, the Reverend Francis Rivet, successor to Gibault, and since February 1799, the brothers John and Donatien Olivier; John attending Cahokia and Donatien, Kaskaskia and Prairie du Rocher. That was the extent of priestly help and comfort Upper Louisiana enjoyed in the early days of Father Maxwell. But there was a Ste. Genevieve boy at his studies in far away Montreal, destined to succeed Father Maxwell as Pastor of Ste. Genevieve, Henri Pratte, the son of one of Ste. Genevieve's most worthy citizens. Father de Saint Pierre, was naturally averse to his transfer to the South. He had found a real home, the only one so far, among the people of Ste. Genevieve. And the people also, were devoted to their good old pastor. But all came off agreeably on the arrival of the new pastor. Father Maxwell had under his immediate jurisdiction two almost equally important villages, Ste. Genevieve, and that settlement of French Royalists, three miles below on the river, called New Bourbon. New Bourbon is now but a name, whilst Ste. Genevieve is a beautiful little city, full of the memorials of the past, some of whose quaint houses date back to the days before Father Maxwell's coming. Ste. Genevieve was, no doubt, the official residence of Father Max- well although he owned property at New Bourbon and made frequent visits to that settlement. As doubts have been raised about this matter of residence, we would quote the affidavits made in the so-called "Maxwell Claim." 6 6 ' ' Maxwell Claim. Application of the Heirs and Legal Bepresentatives of Hugh H. and John P. Maxwell to the General Land Office, for Land Script in lieu of their lands sold by the United States Government and lying within the limits of a Spanish Grant to James Maxwell, which was confirmed to Hugh H. and John P. Maxwell by 202 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis "I knew Father Maxwell when I was a hoy; as he often came to our neighborhood," testifies Allen W. Holloman, "My father lived about twenty miles southwest of Ste. Genevieve, where the priest lived. On the way from Ste. Genevieve to Mine-la-Motte and the Black River country, it was the habit of the priest to pass through our settlement going to that region and return." Mrs. Alzire M. Kennerly deposed among other things: "I am Pierre Menard's daughter. I knew priest Maxwell of Ste. Genevieve. His nephew, Hugh H. Maxwell married one of my sisters. The priest and my father were very intimate." These testimonies are of persons of the very highest character and standing, as United States Senator Bogy styles them, and they are conclusive as to Father Maxwell's residence. Father Maxwell attended a number of settlements within a semi- circle of about one hundred miles, among them, New Madrid, Cape Girardeau, St. Michael's, Potosi, Old Mines, and Perry ville. Concerning the first church at Perryville we have the written testimony of Isidore Moore, who came to Perry County as early as February 1801. "The old church" he says was "built in 1812. The Reverend James Maxwell, Vicar General, blessed it, and said the first Mass in it ; He served us the year 1813, but how often I cannot recollect ; That Reverend gentleman had some years previous occasionally said Mass a few times in the dwell- inghouse of old Mr. Tucker. Perhaps it was in the years 1806 or 1807. " 1 Father Maxwell's duties as Vicar Geneeral for Upper Louisiana consisted, for the most part, in visiting the parishes that were bereft of their own pastors, and, at times, giving faculties to some stray priest that asked for them. When Bishop Peiialver was promoted to the Arehiepiscopal See of Guatemala, July 20, 1801. Father Maxwell's powers as Vicar General lapsed ; but as the Bishop had, with per- mission from Rome, appointed the Vicars General at New Orleans, Thomas Hassett and Patrick Walsh, administrators of the diocese, Father Maxwell's powers were probably renewed, so that he remained Vicar General for Upper Louisiana until the death of Father William Walsh, "Vicar General and Administrator 'ad interim' of the diocese of Louisiana," that is up to March 22, 1806. Now, as there was no one among the Bishops of the Province to restore order, Bishop Carroll assumed Act of Congress, approved 27th April 1816." We are indebted to the Librarian of the Missouri Historical Society, Miss Stella Drumm, for the use of this very im- portant document. Amos Stoddard, in his ' ' Sketches, Historical and Descriptive, of Louisiana," 1812, says of this Concession of land: (Page 135) "A tract of one hundred and two thousand eight hundred and ninety six arpens was conceded Novem- ber the third, 1799 to a Catholic Clergyman now in Upper Louisiana, who is an Irishman by birth. This concession was never extended on the lands embraced by it; nor did any Irish Catholics attempt to avail themselves of the benevolent and pious designs of his Catholic Majesty. ' ' " Original in the Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. Vicar General James Maxwell 203 the administration, as he was empowered to do by Rome. When Propa- ganda approved his action, about the beginning' of 1807, he sent Father John Olivier to New Orleans and, as administrator Apostolic of the Diocese of New Orleans appointed him his Vicar General. 8 Father Maxwell had extensive holdings of real estate in the districts of Ste. Genevieve and New Bourbon. A number of these parcels of land were sold to pay the debts of the holder after his sudden death, May 28th, 1814. The inventory gives us some interesting- information in regard to the concession of a tract of four leagues or twelve miles square, embracing 112,896 arpents, situated in and around what is now Reynolds County. Congress on April 27, 1816, two years after Father Maxwell's death, passed an act, entitled, An Act for the benefit of John P. Maxwell and Hugh H. Maxwell; "that the right title and inter- est of the United States of and to any real estate whereof a certain James Maxwell died seized, the same be hereby released unto John P. Maxwell of the Missouri Territory and Hugh H. Maxwell of the Territory of Illinois, saving and reserving to all persons other than the United States, any right, title or interest of, in, and to the premises aforesaid." This act did not transfer these tracts to Father Maxwell's sup- posed heirs, the nephews, John and Hugh, but only relinguished in their favor any possible claims of the United States. In consequence, the Diocese of Missouri, or St. Louis, as well as the Maxwell heirs, laid claim to the vast tract in Reynolds County, with but indifferent success. The land was afterwards sold by the United States to new settlers. The Church got nothing out of the holdings of the former Vicar General, but the Maxwell heirs have received some reim- bursement from settlers for their readiness to quiet a clouded title, and in fact, have sold some of the land, as John Buford of Reynolds County testified. This is the legal aspect of the case. But there is an historical interest attaching to the whole transaction. Father Maxwell's expressed purpose was to found an Irish Catholic colony in the wilds of Central Missouri and he had practically laid the foundations of such an enterprise. The region at the headwaters of the Black River and the Current River is noted for the beauty and picturesqueness of its scenery. Its rugged hills and fruitful valleys, its limpid rivers and creeks, have become known far and wide. Then there was the promise of rich min- eral deposits. A Catholic government of liberal principles, as the Spanish administration was, promised a new and happy Ireland to that persecuted people. Father Maxwell, himself an Irishman, was persona grata with the Spanish court and government. The government would do all in its power to secure for the Catholic settlers all the advantages, both spiritual and temporal, that they might crave. Shea, J. G., "Life and Times of Archbishop Carroll," pp. 594, 595. 204 History of tht Archdiocest of St. Louis Father .Maxwell's petition was made November 3, 1799, and the grant of the land asked for was made by Lieutenant Governor Carlos Dehault Delassus on the same day and in the same year, 1799. The Lieutenant Governor had the power of granting land titles; but the grant had to be submitted to the Indendant General, who resided in New Orleans. This was often neglected, and hence arose many law-suits. Vet the United States Board of Commissioners on Spanish Claims usually confirmed all Patents issued by the individual Lieutenant Governors, even if uo proof of confirmation by the Intendant General could be shown. Whether James Maxwell attended to this matter is not known. His Patent was, however, approved by an Act of Congress. From Father Maxwell's petition it appears that the first suggestion of an Irish colony in the heart of the wilderness of Upper Louisiana had come from the Spanish minister of State in charge of the Indies, 9 under which title were embraced all Spanish possessions in America. The tract of land suitable for the purpose lay around the forks of the Black River, about eighty miles from Cape Girardeau, and ninety to ninety-five miles from Ste. Genevieve, and about thirty-five miles south of Potosi. The greater part lay in the present county of Reynolds, adjoining Iron and Wayne. Ample testimonies of the truth of this statement are to be found in the printed Report of the trial held after the death of Father Maxwell, in regard to the ownership of this very tract of land. One of them gives the opportunity of describing the route Father Maxwell may be supposed to have travelled to and from. his colony. From Ste. Genevieve to Mine- la-Motte or St. Michaels extended the road that was blazed by Renault through the wilderness along a primeval Indian trail for the purpose of removing the lead from the mines of Madison County to the River at Ste. Genevieve. At St. Michaels the road crossed the Little St. Francis. and ten miles father west, the Big St. Francis. Ironton lies on this road, about twenty miles from Fredericktown. From there the road lay southward into the very heart of what is now the county of Reynolds. Father Maxwell, no doubt, often stopped over at Mine-la-Motte for priestly ministrations to the Catholics of St. Michaels (Fredericktown) and environs, as they were among his parishioners. The Records of their marriages and baptisms he kept at Ste. Genevieve. There was a little cemetery at the junction of the Ste. Genevieve and Perry ville roads, near Mine-la-Motte. Very probably it was here at the "New Village," half way between Mine-la-Motte and Old St. Michaels, that Mass was said by Father Maxwell in some private dwelling. o The Duke De Alcudia, Minister of State, having manifested his desire that some Catholics "from Ireland should come t<> settle themselves in this colony of Louisiana," etc. Vicar General James Maxwell 205 That Father Maxwell had faith in his Irish colony may be judged from the fact that he built a solid house of stone for a store and estab- lished a trading house in the wilderness. 10 But the Irish settlers Father Maxwell had brought to his incipient colony were not as prosperous as they had been led to expect, though the store conducted by the Founder of the colony was a real God-send to the people scattered through the wilderness. Being a highly educated and public-spirited man, the pastor of Ste. Genevieve took a deep interest in the erection of schools. Ste. Genevieve had for many years been the proud possessor of a Grammar school. But in 1808 the Ste. Genevieve Academy was incorporated with twenty-one trustees composed of the best citizens of the town, with Father Maxwell as President. Mr. Mann Butler, the historian of Kentucky, was engaged as principal, and the erection of a fine stone building was begun at once and completed. School was opened, but the times were not propitious to the venture, and it was discontinued until 1820. From far-away Canada comes the following notice of the Ste. Genevieve Academy. "Under a picture of the old house, writes Brother Emery, I find the following notes: "This building was erected at Ste. Genevieve, Missouri, 1808, by the trustees of the Louisiana Acade- my, to be used as a school for the Catholic children of Ste. Genevieve. It was placed, in charge of Brothers of the Christian Schools in 1820, n as we shall recount in the proper place. The building still crowns this hill on which it was erected in 1808, not as a ruin, but kept in excellent state of preservation, with an addition at the rear as the residence of Mr. Thomas Rozier, whose Father Firmin Rozier built the addition in 1854. 10 Joseph Huff, of Iron County, one of tlje witnesses in the Maxwell Claim trial in 1873, testified: "I am sixty years of age. I came to this part of the country in 1829, and have been acquainted with the Maxwell Claim at the forks of Black River since my coming to the country. The Maxwell colony then was a part of the history of the country, and spoken of more, perhaps, than any matter connected with the early settlement. I have heard the old settlers who lived here when Maxwell had his store at the forks, talk together about those times (of what they were all acquainted with), about trading at the store in Maxwell's life time, and about the foreigners Maxwell had in his colony, who were very ignorant of the way to get along in a new country. The store was the only one beyond Potosi, which was thirty-five miles off, and all the settlers traded at Maxwell 's. The colony and store were not continued after the death of Maxwell, the priest. When I came to the country there were few people and some Indians still. I hunted over the Maxwell grant and had the line of survey pointed out to me by the old inhabitants who spoke of it as knowing the survey .... The old settlers expressed regrets that the Maxwell store was dis- continued, where they were all in the habit of trading. Whereas when I came to the country they had to go to Potosi to trade and for some time afterwards, until other stores were established. ' ' 11 Brother Emery is- or was Superior of the Christian Brothers. 206 History of /In Archdiocese of St. Louis Of course, Mr. E. Flagg, who viewed the "handsome structure of stone, commanding a noble prospect," in its stale of ruinous perfection," and "enjoying the reputation of being haunted," must have himself been haunted by the spirit of old romance; for its "broken windows outlined against the western sky", are but idle imaginings of a passer-by, not the result of serious investigation. The building was completed and was never in ruins, but was used for school purposes at the very time of his visit. 12 Of the village itself Mr. Flagg says: "It has that decayed and venerable aspect characteristic of all those early French settlements." Yet, another Traveller, Ashe, gives us a glimpse of the altar of the church of Ste. Genevieve in Father Maxwell's days: "At the Upper end (of the church) there is a beautiful altar, the fronton of which is brass gilt and enriched in medio-relievo, representing the religions (religious orders) of the world, diffusing the benefits of the gospel over the new world. In the middle of the altar there is a crucifix of brass gilt, and underneath it, a copy of a picture by Rafael, representing the Madonna and Child, St. Elizabeth and St. John. In a second group there is a St. Joseph, all perfectly well drawn and colored. The beauty and grace of the Virgin are beyond description and the little Jesus and St. John are charming. 13 Father Maxwell did not escape the usual fate of men of strong character to be misunderstood and even maligned by the idle and the envious. There is a letter in the Baltimore Archives, written by the Pastor of Ste. Genevieve and dated Nov. 17, 1810, that has a bearing on an investigation conducted by Archbishop Carroll of Baltimore into the character of Father Maxwell, then in the 68th year of his life. From a passage of Father Stephen Theodore Badin's letter to Archbishop Carroll on the same matter, it appears that forty three persons under the leadership of one Joseph Fenwick had sent a remonstrance against the Pastor of Ste. Genevieve to Bishop Carroll in order to have him removed, or as Father Maxwell openly charges, to have him replaced by Father Badin himself. It was six years after the withdrawal of the Spanish authorities from Upper Louisiana, and the entire country was now under Bishop Carroll as administrator. Hence his interference. Letters con- taining these charges were sent by both Carroll and Badin to Father Maxwell. The Trappist, Urban Guillet, was the bearer of both letters. What the charges were, we cannot say at present, as the remonstrance of Joseph Fenwick and his co-signers is not at hand, nor the letter of Bishop Carroll, nor that of Father Badin. We hope to find these letters also, but in the meantime it is safe to say, that the charges referred mainly, if not entirely, to breaches of ecclesiastical discipline. It may 12 Flaggs, "The Fur West," 1838., p. 96. 13 Ashe's Travels, p. 119. Vicar General James Maxwell 207 be surmised that his long terms of absence from home, whilst attending to the affairs of his proposed Irish Colony, and a rather outspoken con- tempt for the American Catholic immigrants from Maryland and Ken- tucky, were the main grievances. But, as Father Badin admits, twelve of the fourteen remonstrants were unknown to him and seven were not much entitled to his esteem, "whilst the remaining twenty four were of his former Kentucky parishioners. ' ' "To my certain knowledge," says Father Badin in his letter to the Bishop of Baltimore, "there were (besides the cause of Father Maxwell) many causes which demand the presence of authority of a Bishop to retrieve or improve the affairs of religion." 14 "We will give Father Maxwell's answer to Bishop Carroll and Father Badin, without note or comment, only promising this fact, as recorded by Father Guilday in his Life and Times of John Carroll. "The two pioneer missionaries of Kentucky, Badin and Nerinckx, had been trained in a more rigid school of theology which savoured greatly of the Jansenistic spirit then preva- lent in French and Belgian ecclesiastical circles." 15 It was exactly these two men who found fault with the priestly character of Father Maxwell. Father Maxwell felt aggrieved at what he considered unjust reproach, and declared he would cease his pastoral functions and confine himself to saying Mass. But he must have changed his mind or perhaps been exonerated, as he continued the pastoral care of Ste. Genevieve and its dependencies until his death in 1814. 16 We now quote the following retort courteous from the letter of Father Maxwell to Archbishop Carroll : " I fear that your Lordship is not sufficiently aware of the duplicity of some French ecclesiastics ; they are a jealous, meddling, troublesome set of men. I had the opportunity of being in a state of intimacy with them these five and thirty years that I am a missioner, and I have got under- standing and discernment enough to know the human mind. Your Lordship observes to me that you received a petition having the signatures of forty-three persons, heads of families; my congregation consists alto- gether of French, and I boldly assert, that no Frenchman has signed that petition and that not these persons, heads of families, have signed it, who are altogether unknown to me, excepting Mr. Fenwick 17 who lived for many years past fifty or sixty miles from this place, and who, of course can be but very little acquainted with my personal conduct. I feel the greatest sorrow and regret to show the least opposition and dis- obedience to the orders of Your Lordship ; but from the causes alleged. 1 cannot cheerfully submit to the investigation of my conduct by the 1* Two Maxwell Letters in "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. IV, pp. 231-234. i= Guilday, Peter, "Life and Times of John Carroll," p. 520. is Printed in St. Louis Catholic Historical Eeview, " pp. 231 and 232. tl L. Cit., p. 234; Maxwell accuses Fenwick of "having raised his children without the love and fear of God." 208 History of tin Archdiocest of St. Louis Reverend Mr. Badin; for I consider him judge and party; I should always object to him as a judge in either an ecclesiastical or civil tribunal in a case of mine." 18 . It was on the 4th day of March 1804 that Major Amos Stoddard, in behalf of the United States, took possession of the territory of Louisi- ana, under the treaty of cession. The solemn act of lowering in quick succession the Spanish and the French flags, and hoisting the flag of the United States, took place at St. Louis. 19 It then devolved upon Congress to provide for the better government of the new territory. A governor was appointed, a House of Representatives was elected. A Legislative Council was to be selected by the President of the United States out of eighteen persons nominated by the Territorial House of Representatives. The five counties entitled to representation were: St. Charles, St. Louis, Cape Girardeau, Ste. Genevieve and New Madrid. The first House consisted of thirteen members, and convened at the resi- dence of Joseph Robidoux, December 7, 1812. From among the eighteen persons they had nominated for members of the Council, President Jefferson selected nine, among them the Reverend James Maxwell, whom his associates at once elected member of the Committee of Enrollment, and on January 19, 1814, presiding officer of the body. The Second General Assembly which met at St. Louis on the 5th day of December, 1814, chose William Neely as presiding officer, because Father Maxwell, as we have already stated, had been killed by a fall from his horse on May 28th of the same year. From the Journal of the House of Representatives, as given in the ' ' Missouri Gazette and Illinois Advertiser, ' ' we would quote : ' ' Dec. 6, 1814. Mr. Scott: 'I am instructed to acquaint the House of Repre- sentatives, that a vacancy happened in the Legislative Council by the death of the Honorable James Maxwell, for the County of Ste. Genevieve,' December 7. In conformity to notice of yesterday from the Legislative Council that a vacancy has become therein, and on motion of Mr. Wilson, the House proceeded to the nomination of two persons, one of whom is to is L. Cit., p. 232. i» "There were a great many inhabitants," says Edwards in his "Great West,'' "who looked upon the transfer even at first with disfavor, but it was confined prin- cipally to that class whose possessions were meagre and consequently who had but little to hope for in the rise of property. The coureurs des bois and the voyageurs, doubtless regretted the change, as it gave possession of the country to a people who would throw some trammels over the wild liberties of their vagabondish life. But others regretted the change from political and religious motives. The last Lieutenant Governor Delassus, is said by Barb6-Marbois to have wept when the flag was furled, the tricolor now of the new French Republic, that had superseded the Lilies of France." The selection of Father Maxwell as a member of the Territorial Council had a tendency to conciliate the old French and Spanish settlers with the new order of t hings. Cf . ' ' Great West, ' ' pp. 278. Vicar General James Maxwell 209 supply the vacancy in the Legislative Council occasioned by the death of the Honorable James Maxwell." Father Maxwell died at the age of seventy -two years and was buried May 30, 1814, in the Church he had served so well. Father Francis Savine of Cahokia performed the last rites of the Church. When the old church was enlarged by Father Weiss, the body remained undisturbed. Now the remains rest beneath the pavement of the sanctuary in the church, so tastefully enlarged and renovated by the present pastor the Very Reverend Charles Van Tourenhout. One beautiful eminence near the city still bears the name of its former owner. Maxwell's Hill. His name is one of which Ste. Genevieve may well be proud. 20 zo After storm and strife comes rest eternal. We would subjoin this inscription on Father Maxwell's tombstone, Ste. Genevieve Parish Church: Ci git Le Rev. Jacques Maxwell decede le 28 Mai, 1814 age de 72 ans Cure de Cette Paroisse de 1797 a 1814 Heureux qeux qui demeurent dans votre maison. Seigneur lis vous honerant des tous siecles. Psaume 83 — vers 5. Chapter 12 WA X I ) E R I \( J W ESTWAR] ) Since the 6tli day of October 17SS, when Bishop Hubert of Quebec cheerfully transferred his authority over the Illinois Country to the Preftct Apostolic, at Baltimore, Dr. Carroll was very solicitous in supply- ing priests for those neglected missions. Bishop Hubert had also written about Father Gibault having "incurred the suspicion of treason against the British government," and of Father de la Valiniere being "a man of good morals," but of "a turbulent spirit." The first, rather severe judgment was accepted as a warning against the former Vicar General of Quebec, the other judgment, though rather ominous, was disregarded in the appointment of Father de la Valiniere as the Vicar-General of Baltimore. Dr. Carroll was led in the course of time to make some other unfortunate appointments, although the most of them were good men and priests. Three of these appointees of Monseigneur Carroll success- ively held the position of Pastors of the Parish of St. Louis, on the Spanish side, although they had been engaged for the missions and par- ishes in Illinois. They were the Dominican Father Ledru, the Benedictine Monk Didier, and the Secular Priest 'Pierre Janin. Another appointee of Dr. Carroll, the Recollot Charles Leander Lusson, remained at Cahokia about four months, when he obtained an appointment from Bishop Penalver of Louisiana to the pastorship of St. Charles on the Missouri. The first of these whom Bishop Carroll later on styles, "that apostate Dominican, called Ledru." came to Detroit from Canada and received his appointment to the Parish of Cahokia from Dr. Carroll in 1789, but almost immediately crossed over to the Spanish side. He exercised his ministry at St. Charles and St. Ferdinand, and, on the departure of Father Bernard de Limpach, became Pastor of St. Louis. What roused Dr. Carroll's anger against him was his duplicity, especially his former unauthorized claim, that he had been sent to America as a Missionary Apostolic. His first entry in the Register of Baptisms occurs in November 1789, and the last in September 1793, during which period he baptized one hundred and sixty-eight whites, fifty-five negroes, and nineteen Indians; solemnized twenty-nine marriages of whites and two of Indians and whites and officiated at the interment of seventy whites, thirty-five negroes, and three Indians. Father Ledru 's successor in St. Louis was the celebrated Benedictine of the Congregation of St. Maur, Dom Pierre Joseph Didier. Father Didier 's life was a most eventful one. At the outbreak of the French Revolution he was stationed at the Abbey Church of St. Denis, the (210) Wandering Westward 211 place of sepulture of the French monarchs, since the days of Dagobert I, A. D. 638. No church in Christendom had so many relics, few were so rich in glorious memories. In 1789 whilst Procurator of the Abbey, Dom Didier, had permitted the royal troops to quarter there, an action which made him obnoxious to the radical element in Paris, and eventually brought ruin to the Abbey itself. On the 31st day of July, 1793 its destruction was decreed by the National Convention. The decree was carried out with savage fury, the bodies of dead Kings and Queens were dug up and thrown into lime-pits; the monuments were broken and the fragments scattered. Only the bare walls remained to tell of the vengeance of an infuriated mob. Dom Didier had fled from the doomed Abbey in 1789 and kept himself in hiding until a safe and honorable place should be found for him. A company of French Catholics had been formed in Paris in 1790 for the purpose of founding a colony in the backwoods of America. A tract of land, about three million acres, north of the Ohio River was secured by the Company. The colony was named Gallipolis. The Papal Nuncio at Paris was requested by the leaders of the Company to obtain from Rome the appointment of a Bishop for the new colony. The choice of the members for this position was the same Benedictine Dom Didier of the Congregation of St. Maur. The Prefect of the Propaganda. Cardinal Antonelli, answered that there was a Bishop in that region, John Carroll of Baltimore. But Dom Didier replied, that the location of the new colony was so far inland from Baltimore, that Bishop Carroll could not give proper care to it. Besides the Colony was French, and Frenchmen wanted to have a French Bishop. The Nuncio wrote a second time to Cardinal Antonelli, saying that three or four priests (Sulpicians) were preparing to go to Gallipolis, with Dom Didier as the spiritual head of the colonj-. Propaganda yielded, and on April 26th, 1790 appointed Father Didier, not Bishop, nor Vicar Apos- tolic, but Vicar General in spiritualibus for the space of seven years, on condition that such jurisdiction should not conflict with that of Dr. Carroll. Besides Dom Didier 's faculties would have to be confirmed by Bishop Carroll before he could use them. About Didier 's character the Cardinal was informed that he was a religious of good morals, sound in doctrine, though of an impetuous and idealistic nature. Bishop Carroll, on September 3rd, 1791, speaks of the arrival, last year, of a Benedictine Monk, with a Congregation on "the banks of the Ohio." Now, as Carroll held jurisdiction over all the territory of the United States, and as the United States certainly claimed the Northwest territory, including Ohio, as a part of its domain, the Congregation of Gallipolis was subject to Bishop Carroll from the very start. In consequence of these facts becoming known, the Papal Nuncio at Paris disadvised the Sulpicians 212 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis from going with the colonists. They then decided to go to Baltimore. Bishop Carroll was kept informed about the whole matter by Cardinal Antonelli, and Father Didier obtained approval of his faculties from him. 1 The colony did not thrive; neither temporally nor spiritually. The colonists, for the most part, were Parisians altogether unadapted to the conditions of pioneer life in the wilderness, and spiritually many of them were tainted with the irreligious spirit of the pre-revolution times. At last the colony broke up, its members scattering in all directions: The better part of them sought refuge at New Madrid, New Bourbon and St. Louis, all on the Spanish side of the river. Only a small remnant of the several thousand French colonists remained in the city of Gallipolis. When Fathers Badin and Barrieres visited them in September 179:5, "they were delighted and at their departure they shed bitter tears." 2 A sad story of failure, yet one replete with all the elements of old romance, redolent of an old-world civilization ground to dust in contact with primeval nature and its inexorable laws. On July 21st, 1792, Dom Didier 's name is signed in the Baptismal Register of St. Charles Borromeo's Church in St. Charles on the Missouri River. A little later we find Didier at Florissant, and in 1794 he took up his residence in St. Louis, having attended to its spiritual wants since December 1793. From December 1793, to April 1799, he baptized two hundred and twenty whites, seventy-nine negroes, and sixteen Indians. He solemnized seventy-three marriages of whites and one marriage of white and Indian, and buried eighty-five whites, sixty-one negroes, and nine Indians. Dom Didier 's life in St. Louis was quiet and peaceful. He was, no doubt, glad to have found this haven of rest. Being a Benedictine Monk, he had a special love for the beauty of nature. Hone, in his "Every-Day Book" for 1826 says: "The Monks have compiled a Cata- logue of flowers for each day in the year, and dedicated each flower to a particular saint, on account of it flowering about the time of the saint's festival." It is said of Father Didier that he delighted in green herbage and bright flowers ; No doubt, he also remembered their old-time names, and their religious associations and the French designation for the flower- beds in a church-yard, "Les Bouquest de l'Eglise." But no Benedictine garden was complete without a large assortment of herbs whose fragrance and medicinal virtues might serve in alleviating the pains and bodily ailments of his spiritual children. And then, the good Benedictine was i See "The Gallipolis Colony" by John McGovern, O. P., in "Records and Studies of Catholic Historical Society," vol. 37, No. 1. Also "The Gallipolis Colony," by L. J. Kenny, S. J., in "Catholic Historical Review," vol. IV, pp. 415; rind Guilday's "Life and Times of John Carroll," pp. 374-407. 2 Spalding, "Sketches of the Early Catholic Missionaries of Kentucky," p. <>-. Wandering Westward 213 a lover of the Cross. On the highest spot of town near the west gate, he built a calvary, that is a large stone platform with stone steps on all four sides. A large crucifix was erected in the center of this Calvary, to throw its shadow over the living and the dead of his Parish. 3 We can easily picture the character of Father Didier as of a pious, kindly and benevolent old man, grave in his manner, and of a benign counte- nance, and highly respected by all. He is reported to have died in October 1799. His last recorded ministerial act in St. Louis is dated May 16th, 1799. During his last illness Father Lusson attended to St. Louis from St. Charles, and continued to do so until the arrival of Father Pierre Janin, a secular priest, whom Bishop Carroll sent to the Illinois country in company with Fathers Richard and John Francis Rivet. From Father Rivet's letters 4 we learn that on October 20th, 1795, Father Janin was permanently settled at Kaskaskia. Besides the fact, that the Indians of that region desired a missionary, the great chief de Conague, who has the greatest influence over all the other tribes, seems to have taken too strong a hold of him to let him go elsewhere." The French were also anxious to retain the priest. But "Father Janin had no aptitude for missionary work," as Father Rivet writes six months later, and resigned his Commission. The small salaries promised by the American government were not forthcoming, in spite of Bishop Car- roll's intercession. The missionaries were actually starving. There is a sinister note in this lettter in regard to Father Janin : "he will pass into the Spanish domain." On May 24th, 1796, Father Rivet praises Janin as a man of "pure faith and irreproachable morals," but represents him as saying that "his age does not allow him to pursue an enterprise a thousand times more painful and difficult than he had thought. ' ' Shortly before this, Father Rivet had learnt that Father Janin was about to leave for New Orleans, and intended to send his resignation to Bishop Carroll from that city. Father Rivet was now appointed Vicar-General, signing himself at the same time, "Missionary appointed for the Savages, for the moment exercising the ministry in the Parish of St. Francis Xavier. " 5 Father Janin had really left his post of duty without an exeat and started on his way to New Orleans. But stopping at the southernmost point reached by Father Marquette on his voyage of discovery, the Post of Arkansas, was induced to remain there with faculties from Bishop Peiialver of Louisiana. The Register of Baptisms, Marriages and Sepul- a Rothensteiner, "The St. Louis Calvary" in "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review, ' ' vol. Ill, p. 39. * Cf. Maes, Camillus P., Bishop of Covington, in "The Ecclesiastical Review," July and August numbers, 1906. 5 Maes, op. cit., pp. 36-42 passim. •J14 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis lures of the Parisli of Arkansas larks the two first pages: On page 3, Father Janirj enters the record of a Baptism under date of the 13th of September, 17!>(i. From that day on until December 28th, 17!)9, Father Janin baptized eighty-seven persons, and united in Marriage eighteen couples. After that there is a vacancy of almost three years. On April 6th, 1800, Pierre Janin became the canonical pastor of the Parish of St. Louis. (i During the four and a half years of his administration he baptized two hundred and twenty-five whites, an hundred and fifteen negroes and fifty- nine Indians; solemnized the marriages of thirty-four whites and two whites and Indians, and buried one hundred and thirty -eight whites, (ifty-eight negroes, and nineteen Indians. The large number of inter- ments recorded during Father Janin 's pastorate is accounted for by the fact that the smallpox made its first appearance in St. Louis on the loth of May, 1801. But when the Spanish Dominion came to an end Bishop Peiialver was promoted to the Achiepiscopal See of Guatemala. His Vicar- Generals in New Orleans, Rev. Thomas Cannon Hasset, and Rev. Patrick Walsh continued to exercise their powers with express permission from Rome. Canon Hasset on June 10th, 1803, issued a circular letter to each priest in the Diocese asking whether he wished to retire with the Spanish forces or to remain. The pastors of St. Louis and St. Charles, Pierre Janin and Leander Lusson, retired with the Spanish forces, leaving the entire field of Upper Louisiana to Father Maxwell, the Vicar General, and a visitor from the East, Father Thomas Flynn. 7 Of Father Thomas Flynn, "Capuchin of the Order of St. Francis," as he styles himself in the Records of Florissant, administered the Parish of St. Louis from December 1806 to January 1808 and also engaged him- self to visit the Parish of St. Ferdinand six times per year for the purpose of singing Highmass and baptizing. For this service he was to receive from each family at least one bushel of wheat. Those refusing to con- tribute were to be constrained by the chief trustee to do so. Father Flynn 's Baptisms at Florissant numbered thirty. Two marriages were solemnized by him in 1807. The contract obliged him also to visit the sick and to prepare the children for First Holy Communion. Father Flynn arrived in St. Louis early in November 1806. On November 8th, he wrote a letter to a Wm. McCordell of Bardstown, Ky., in which the following passage occurs: "I have said Mass in the Church, which is pretty decent, twice ; and tomorrow, Sunday the Church- wardens, at the High-Mass are to install me as pastor over the place. The Church has a tolerably good bell, high altar, pulpit and commodious pews. The house for the priest is convenient, but rather out of repair. Church Records of St. Louis Cathedral. Shea, "Life and Times of Bishop Carroll," p. 582. Wandering Westward 215 There is annexed to it a large garden well stocked with fruit trees, barn, stable and other out-offices. "There is to be an assembly of the parishioners within the next few days in order to consider making a provision for my support, which will be paid annually. In short, my dear Friend, for the animal life, it is highly probable, I shall be very well off; and it is only the spiritual which gives me pain. For I shall be sixty miles distant from the clergy- man who is nearest me. However, I shall endeavor to have the comfort of seeing him as often as possible." 8 It has been stated that Father Flynn had no authority to exercise pastoral ministrations in St. Louis, because he had no dimissorials to show nor faculties, from any one. Yet it must be remembered that Father James Maxwell was considered Vicar General of the district of Upper Louisiana, and it can be presumed, as even, Father Nerinckx presumes, that Father Maxwell did kindly receive his compatriot and consented to his stay in St. Louis. Very little was known about Father Thomas Flynn until recently, and what has now come to light is not favorable to the Capuchin of the Order of St. Francis. One of the earliest mission- aries in New York and Pennsylvania after the dissolution of the Society of Jesus, the Capuchin Peter Helbron, the founder of the Church at Buffalo and many other places, writes to Bishop Carroll from Pittsburg under date of November 1st, 1805: "Concerning Mr. Flynn." Est vir nullius resolutionis : he left me at Buffalo, when the Congregation bought a place on purpose for the priest, which is not prepared yet, and will not so soon be ready to receive the priest. Mr. Flynn went clown the River Ohio, perhaps to the Monks of La Trappe. . . He was about five weeks with me without celebrating, and preaching but once. I promised to the faithful in the wilderness to come back again." 9 On October 22nd, 1806, he wrote to Carroll: "Mr. Flynn is gone down the river to the Trappists. " At that time the Trappists had their establishment on Pottingers Creek, Ky. 10 Father Helbron was, therefore, mistaken about the destination of Father Flynn. Not to the Trappists did he go, but to St. Louis. On January 1st, 1807, Father Charles Nerinckx wrote a long Latin letter to Archbishop Carroll in which he alludes to some unhappy priests, among them Father Flynn, having come without credentials from the Bishop of Baltimore, yet exercising priestly func- tions. "With the consent of Rev. Father Badin, " writes Father 8 A Letter of Flynn to Bishop Carroll, dated November 8, 1806, of which a passage is printed in Shea's "Life of Carroll," p. 595 gives the same information. 9 Helbron, Peter, "Baptismal Register at Sportman's Hall," in "Records of American Catholic Society," vol. XXVI, p. 374. 10 Nerinckx to Carroll, printed in "Catholic Historical Review," vol. VI, pp. 83 and 84. L'Ki History of tin Archdiocest of xt. Louis Xerinckx, " he (Father Flynn) had preached several sermons and visited a number of missions, but heard only a few confessions. I should judge lie had better remain in the Trappist Monastery. From his letters we learn that at St. Louis or some other place in Louisiana, he introduced himself as pastor, or rather, was introduced by laymen, although, to .judge more mildly, we must suppose that he had jurisdiction from the Vicar-General there. -May God grant that this matter have no sad end." Now, whatever we may hold in regard to these reports, partly based on mere hear-say, one thing is certain, that Father Helbron's judgment as to Father Flynn was correct "Est vir nullius resolutionis, " he was a man of no constancy of purpose. The contract which Father Flynn made with the Church-wardens of St. Louis, was approved by the Congregation in public session on November 23, 1806. The preamble states, that Father Flynn was sent to St. Louis by Father Maxwell, Cure of Ste. Genevieve : First, the very Reverend Father Thomas Flynn binds himself to all the citizens of this parish to serve them in his ministry for the time and space of one year to count from the first day of the month of next December, and to finish on the same day of next year, 1807, during all this time to exercise the sacerdotal functions in the aforesaid Parish excepting only the last Sunday of each month, to have the faculty of serving the parishoners of St. Ferdinand and St. Charles, where the Reverend Father will be able to exercise his ministry. Secondly, if it should happen, that the last Sunday of some month of the year be a great feast, then the Reverend Father Thomas Flynn will not be permitted to absent himself from this parish to serve the others; lie will then take the following Sunday to discharge his duties in the villages of St Ferdinand ami St. Charles. Thirdly, The Reverend Father Flynn will have the kindness to say the Mass at nine o'clock in the summer, that is to say, from the first of April to the first of October, and he will say it at ten o'clock in the winter that is to say, from the first of October to the first of April. Fourthly, The Reverend Father obliges himself to instruct the children of this city belonging to the parish in the doctrine necessary for the Catholic, Apostolic and Roman state, every Sundaj' after Vespers, and during the time of Lent to put the young people in the proper disposition to approach the sacraments. Fifthly, The Reverend Father Flynn obliges himself to visit the sick of the Parish when he will be requested and to assist them by his ministry at all times. Sixthly, And we citizens of this Parish in our turn oblige ourselves towards the Reverend Father Thomas Flynn to furnish him a sum af 360 piasters in current money, that is to say, in skins of the deer at the rate of 40 sols the pound, or in soft wheat, a piaster per minot (39 litres) " Wandering Westward 217 which sum will be placed in the hand of the church wardens in charge to be at the disposal of the said Reverend Father Flynn, and that to compen- sate him for his trouble and care in the exercise of his ministry. And in case of any private individual failing to satisfy his engagement, — for that which concerns his obligation, — the warden in charge is authorized by each of us to follow up the debtor with the rigor of the law." 11 In addition to his salary Father Flynn was to receive four dollars for every burial of an adult, two dollars for burial of a child, three dollars for every High-Mass, and five dollars for every marriage cere- mony performed. The parishioners subscribed at this meeting or soon after, the sum of $331.75. Probably every parishioners name is affixed to the document, either in his own hand or by mark. On January 8th, 1808, Father Flynn resigned his parochial charges at St. Louis and St. Ferdinand and wandered on, we know not where. The records of St. Louis show that Father Flynn baptized eighty-eight whites, eleven negroes, and one Indian, and solemnized eleven marriages of whites, and buried thirty whites and nine negroes. From the day of Father Flynn 's departure in 1808, until the arrival of Father De Andreis in 1818, that is, for fully ten years the parish of St. Louis had no pastor, but was visited, at irregular intervals, by Father James Maxwell of Ste. Genevieve, Fathers Urban Guillet, Joseph Mary Dunand and Bernard Langlois, all Trappists from Monk 's Mound, and Father Francis Savine from Cahokia. Father Savine after serving the Church on occasional visits shier December 11th, 1811, eventually took full and exclusive charge by an agreement with the Church-wardens, dated St. Louis, May 29th, 1814 : "For and in consideration of a sufficient sum I have received from the faithful of this parish, as well as the assurances of other considerations, I oblige myself to discharge the spiritual duties as Cure of the Church of St. Louis every third Sunday until the end of April of next year 1815. " 12 The document was signed by Francis Savine, Priest. This arrangement with the Church-wardens was continued until October 1817. The Baptisms during the period numbered two hundred and fifty whites, seventy-three negroes, two Indians : the marriages ninety-one white couples and two negroes. The Burials, mostly performed by Trudeau as chanter of the Church, by Jean Louis Mave, sacristan, and by Samuel Solomon and Patrick Lee as Church Wardens. These minor officers of the Parish also certified to all the burials. 11 The original of this contract between Father Thomas Flynn and the St. Louis Church -Wardens is preserved in the Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. i- Register of the meetings of the Parish of St. Louis. MS in Archives "i Archdiocese of St. Louis. Chapter 13 FAT I IKK I) IN AN I) AND HIS TRAPPIST BRETHREN In the early Records of the Church of St. Louis three names of Trap- pisl Monks occur at frequent intervals, Urban Guillet, Abbot, Joseph Marie Dunand, Prior, and Bernard Langlois. Of these three priests Father Dunand, or the Prior, as he was usually called, is by far the most important in the history of the diocese of St. Louis. Legends have entwined themselves around the memory of this strange figure and his still stranger career. There was a touch of the mysterious in the sudden appearance of this white-robed monk in such widely separated localities as Pottinger's Creek, and Casey's Creek in Kentucky, Kaskaskia and Cahokia, in Illinois, Prairie du Chien in Wisconsin, St. Louis, Florissant and the Barrens in Missouri, always bent on winning souls for Christ. Father Dunand was certainly one of the most interesting, as well as heroic figures of our early days of struggle and self-sacrifice, a name worthy of a bright page in the records of the unf orgotten past. 1 Father Dunand did not come alone to the Illinois Country, but as the second in authority of a religious community of priests, brothers and laymen in their employ or under their instruction; but even after all his brethren of the Order had withdrawn from the country, he alone remained on the mission in the wilderness from 1807 to 1820. Joseph Marie Dunand was born April 22nd, 1774 at Chapelle les Rennes in Lorraine. His childhood fell amid days of civil and religious strife. The per fervid words of the Declaration of Independence had found a glad response in every nook and corner of olden France. The soldiers of the French regiments that had so bravely fought under Washington, as General in Chief, on their return, spread far and wide the cry of the new democracy, ' ' liberty, equality, fraternity, ' ' ; and the youthful Dun- and felt its wild charm. He became a grenadier in the republican army of France. But the fond dream was rudely dispelled. The Committee of Public Safety waged a rentless war against the faithful adherents of the Church, as well as against the royalists. The grenadiers of Dunand 's i A number of our best historical writers have devoted deep attention to the Trappish Colony of Abbot Urban and Prior Dunand. Bishop Martin Spalding in his "Sketches of Kentucky;" Flick, in "Records of the American Catholic His- torical Society," vol. I; Maes in his "Life of Father Nerinckx;" Webb, "History of Catholicity in Kentucky," and Garraghan in the "Records of American Catholic Historical Society." The so-called "Diary of Father Joseph Dunand" was also published in the Records, vol. XXVI. (218) Father Dunand and His Trappist Brethren 219 Company were one day ordered to shoot a priest. Against this act of sacrilege his better feelings revolted : that very day he fled from his native France and found safety in Switzerland. Under the influence of the horrors he had witnessed the young man sought admission to the strictest Order in the Church, the Community of the Trappists, in the Abbey of Val Sainte near Freiburg. When in 1791 a republican army invaded Switzerland the inmates and dependants of the Abbey, about 250 persons, fled to various parts of Germany, from there some took passage to America, others to Russia, and others returned to Val Sainte. It was in this last refuge of peace that the youthful Dunand spent the years of his novitiate, and was raised to the holy priesthood. On the 3rd day of February, 1805, Father Dunand started with Brother Ignatius on his voyage to the United States, where a new settle- ment of the Trappists had been founded three years previous, with about twenty-seven members, under the leadership of Abbot Urban Guillet. Father Dunand and his companion were stopped on the frontiers of France, by the chief of the Custom House, an apostate priest, who treated them with great severity, but at last forwarded them to Amster- dam. On May 20th, 1805, they embarked on an American vessel, and on August 14th, arrived at Baltimore. Here they were received by Abbot Urban and with him they set out for Kentucky, where the new Monastery Avas situated. But alas, instead of a flourshing community Father Dun- and found at Pottinger's Creek only the sad wasted remnants of the first colony of Pigeon Hills, where twenty-one monks, priests and broth- ers, and sixteen laymen, had lived in Abbot Guillet \s care. Sickness and desertion had worked terrible havoc. Three of the priests had died soon after their arrival in Kentucky, and two more in the course of a year. The excessive hardships of the journey on flatboats down the Ohio, coupled with great austerity of the Rule they followed, certainly were responsible for this sad condition of affairs. Father Nerinckx, who travelled with them a part of the way, is rather severe on Father Urban, the Superior of the Community. ' ' In my opinion, Father Urban, is not a man in the right place," 2 and it seems well to soften its asperity with the milder judgment of Bishop Martin Spalding: "Father Urban Guillet was a man of great piety, indefatig- able zeal and activity, and of a singular meekness and suavity of manners." 3 It is true, the zeal for the rigid rules of his Order made him blind to the necessities of his subjects in their new and severe surround- 2 "Annales de la Propagation de la Foi," (Louvain, ed.), p. 292. 3 Spalding, M. J., "Sketches of Early Catholic Missioners of Kentucky,' Louisville, 1844. The chapter on the Trappists was reprinted in "Catholic Cabinet.' vol. II, pp. 604-612. 220 History of tht Ai'chdiocest of St. Linn's ings. In ;in old world monastery, Abbot Urban would, no doubt, have been an ideal superior. Father Dunand arrived at Pottinger's Creek near Holy Cross Church in Nelson County, Kentucky, on October 10th, 1805. The well known missionary Sleplian Madin who, at the time was Pastor of Holy Cross Parish in the neighborhood, assisted the almost helpless community in every possible way. Father Dunand also was attacked by the fever on the very day of his arrival, and struggled for four months between life and death. But God had further work for him to do. Scarcely had he gained sufficient strength when he set out with some of his brethren to found a new establishment of his Order at a place called Casey's Creek, the wry place of which Father Nerinckx once wrote: "I lately visited my St. Bernard's parish and stopped over night with the admirable Monks of La Trappe. I found fourteen members in the stable. That structure, which is not entirely rainproof, is dormitory, refectory and church. A space is set apart for the lay-brothers, and there is a small apartment for storing provisions, in which 1 slept with my guide. The Fathers and Brothers sleep on the bare floor; I had a bag of oats to rest on."' Father Dunand. however, could not be discouraged by such trivial circumstances. Referring to Pigeon's Hills, he says: "There were not more than seven Catholic families there. We built a little chapel in which to say Mass, and the Catholics and some Protes- tants were present on Sundays and Feastdays. I was perfectly content in this new establishment, and counted on having found my abode of peace, but Divine Providence had many other hardships in store for me." 6 Father Dunand was not mistaken in this: the restless spirit of Urban, the Abbot, fell upon a new plan. The Indians along the borders of the Mississippi had invited him to their beautiful country, and prom- ised to send their children to him for instruction, if he would come. The thought of the conversion of these poor heathen children of the wilderness fell like consuming fire into the good Abbot's soul. He resolved at once to transfer his entire community to Upper Louisiana. The exact location was to be determined later on. With Father Dunand, the Prior, and one lay-brother, Dom Urban started on the perilous journey in the depth of winter, heedless of all things but his Indian project. Of the hardships and dangers of this overland trip on foot from Kentucky to St. Louis, Father Dunand gives us a few thrilling inci- dents. "During this expedition I was also obliged to carry my own pro- visions. Even at that, I was exposed to starvation in this vast wilderness. The cold was extreme ; the rivers were all frozen and the ground was covered with snow. Wishing to reach St. Louis by Christmas Day, I 4 Cf. Maes, Camillus, "Life of Nerinckx,' - p. L08. Dunand 's Diary, 1. c, p. 331. Father Dunand and His Trappist Brethren 221 took a guide whom I made walk before me to sound the ice. It is the custom for the traveller to supply himself with a pole which he carries crosswise before him in order to keep him up, should the ice give way beneath his feet. I neglected this precaution, wishing no other staff for crossing than trust in God. ' ' It was putting myself to a severe test ! We were in the middle of the river when the ice more than a league in extent, cracked with a great crash. I could not help trembling, but my guide reassured me, saying that it was a proof that the ice was good, and this would only strengthen it. As a result my fears departed and the journey ended without accident." 6 Wild and forbidding, as Southern Illinois then looked, and full of dan- ger and hardship, as the journey really was, it must all have seemed but the proper setting for the wild and unruly population of its few towns. Roughly speaking, there Avere three classes : the aborigines, the Indians, whose native manners and customs had been depraved rather than ele- vated by the contact with the white adventurers; then the descendants of the old French-Canadian voyageurs and coureurs de bois mingled with a number of cultured immigrants from France and the West Indies, all now designated as Creoles; and lastly the Americans from the East. In his Diary, Father Dunand speaks with pity of the poor Indians, with love and admiration of the Creoles and the Catholic newcomers from Mary- land and Kentucky, but with anger of the irreligious, contemptuous and persecuting Americans. It was in November 1808 that the party had started for Cahokia, where they arrived after walking ten days through the woods. Dunand seems to have left the Abbot with M. Jarrot, he himself crossing the frozen Mississippi on the eve of Christmas 1808. But let the good Father continue the interesting story : "Having arrived at St. Louis I found the district in a pitiful state. Deprived of priests and all spiritual aid, the morals of the people were entirely corrupt, and ignorance of religion was so general, that the in- habitants scarcely recognized the name Catholic. The small number of the better instructed rejoiced in their Faith. For the rest, some openly mocked at it and others behaved with perfect indifference. This fatal carelessness had its source in want of instruction. I am not referring to the natives of the country who, generally speaking, were good. It was through the incursion of foreigners that irreligion and licentiousness had made their way into this distant land. Divided in language, senti- ments and interests from the rest, the aliens worked against the commun- ity 's good. They were the persecutors of the priests. Having gathered a certain fortune by dint of crimes and injustices, and then having retired to the villages to enjoy in plenty the ease and pleasures and comforts of life, they naturally resented the zeal of the missionaries who exposed « Dunand 's Diary, 1. c, pp. 3.T2 and :::-:::. l'l'2 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louts their baseness and disturbed their peace. The very sight of a priest was unendurable to them. Tt acted as a secret reproach to their consciences. Their hearts were closed to the truth which condemned them, though in doing so it repelled further from them those who brought them a mes- sage so important." 7 It is a terrible arraignment, the man consumed with zeal for the honor of God, makes of the great mass of the western people. Yet, there are many facts to substantiate his severest charges. Only one of them appears as an unsupported legend: No priest of that period "was put in a hollow tree and abandoned to the current of the Mississippi." This legend probably originated in the fact that Father Valentin, the first resident priest of St. Louis, rather suddenly departed from St. Louis in a pirogue. But, as Father Dunand says, the natives of the country, those that had enjoyed the mild rule of the Jesuits, were good Christians still : When He announced on the evening of his arrival that he would celebrate Holy Mass at midnight in honor of the Feast of Christmas, their joy was intense. "I found the church w r ell filled, despite the rigor of the cold. I felt great satisfaction in seeing so many Christians unite to celebrate the birthday of our Divine Saviour. The joy of these brave people was not less; for they had not counted at all on having Mass on this most solemn occasion. They did all in their power to induce me to remain among them. I understood better than they did how much they were to be pitied for having no priest, and so I was glad to accede to their request. My stay w^as not entirely unprofitable." 8 "This village, which has nearly a hundred and twenty families, is generally good. Everybody approached the Sacraments; nevertheless. I was forced now and then to use a little strategy and have recourse to pious ingenuity to induce them to do so, seeing that they were neg- ligent." 9 One more sample of Father Dunand 's blunt methods: "One day in passing near the prison of St. Louis I learned that they were about to hang a man who was a Catholic. I at once entered the jail. Six Protestant ministers surrounded the criminal. One of these wore a torn coat, a long beard and had a wild look about him. I mistook him for the criminal, as the latter on the contrary was well dressed in white linen with his beard newly cut. I therefore, said fearlessly, to the first, 'Of what religion are you? He answered: "I am an Anabaptist.' 7 Dunand 's Diary, 1. c, p. 333. s Dunand 's Diary, 1. c, p. 334. Father Thomas Flynn had departed in January of that year. 9 Dunand 's Diary, 1. c, p. 343. Father Dunand and His Trappist Brethren 223 'so much the worse for you, then 1 said I, 'it is a religion that is worth nothing. Is it possible that on the verge of death you do not seek to enter the true religion?' 'I am not the criminal,' he quickly added as he pointed slightingly to the condemned man, 'it is he who is the culprit.' I was abashed at my error, but, without troubling myself further, I promptly approached the man who had been pointed out and asked him some questions. I knew from his responses that he had never been bap- • tized. Then I explained to him the essential things to know, above all the necessity of Baptism. He was quite touched and anxious to receive it. The ministers arose in indignation against me, immediately entered into a dispute and, Bible in hand, strove for four hours by the clock to prove to me that Baptism was useless. They were furious and surrounded the wretch merely for the purpose of keeping me away. All their efforts served for nothing. I brought water and, notwithstanding their fury, baptized him half an hour before they led him to his death." 10 But what was Dom Urban Guillet doing all this time ? As we have seen, his purpose was to establish a Trappist Monastery at some as yet undetermined place in the heart of the continent. He had two offers of land : one at Florissant on the Missouri River, and the other near Caho- kia. A wealthy Irishman, John Mullanphy, offered the one, consisting of one hundred and twenty acres with two houses ; whilst Nicholas Jarrot, one of the most intelligent, wealthy and respectable French citizens countered with a tract of four hundred acres in the historic Mound region of Illinois. The good Abbot was undecided: he entered into negotiations with Governor Lewis as to some grant of land to his community on account of its being an educational institution, but made no headway in the matter. On January 28th, 1809, he wrote to Bishop Carroll: "Both Governor Lewis 11 and Governor Harrison, are desirous of having me, and the habitants on either side of the river contend among themselves as to who will have the college. I have found on each side of the river a suit- able site for a monastery, but have been unable to proceed to a sale, owing to the self-interest actuating both parties. Those of St. Louis say that the Post side of the river is unhealthy, while those of the Post say the same of the St. Louis side. This is why I contented myself with accept- ing two houses and one hundred and thirty arpents of land near St. Louis for a year only, so as during this time to get at the real truth of the matter and build at the place which will suit best." 12 io Dunand 's Diary, 1. c, p. 341 and 342. ii Merriwether, Lewis, was stationed at St. Louis, General Harrison at the Post of Vincennes. i 2 Abbott Guillet to Bishop Carroll, January 28, 1809. l'iM History of the Archdiocesi of St. Louis In the meantime the colony ;ii Pottinger's Creek were busy con- Structing a flat-boat, with which they were to float down the Ohio and ascend the Mississippi. "They were" as Bishop Spalding relates "en- abled to depart from Kentucky early in the spring of 1809; and they proceeded without accident to the month of the Ohio. Here they were delayed three weeks, awaiting the arrival of a body of boatmen, whom Father I'rban, who had traveled by land to St. Louis, had promised to send to meet them at this point, in order to aid them in the difficult ascent of the Mississippi. During their stay at the mouth of the Ohio the Monks landed on tin; Illinois side of the river, near the site of the present town of ('aim. Here they felled and sawed timber, and fitted up a temporary altar. at the foot of a large widely branching tree, and there they daily sang the divine praises and offered up the Holy Sacrifice of the New Law. It was perhaps the first time that the voice of prayer 1 had been heard amidst those dense and unreclaimed forests; the first time that the Holy Victim had been offered up." 13 At length the Canadian boatmen arrived, and took charge of the voyage, and towed the boats up-stream along the banks by means of ropes. This mode of voyaging consumed a whole month. As their final destiny was Florissant, the boat was towed up to the mouth of the Missouri River. Here an accident occurred which caused great consternation. "In attempting to draw the boat into the rapid current of the Missouri the towline broke and the boat shot rapidly down the stream. All the able-bodied men were on the shore and only the infirm and disabled were on board. The boat continued to descend the .Mississippi almost an entire day, before the boatmen on the shore were able to check it; and several days' hard labor were required to regain their former position and many more to reach the nearest landing place for Florissant, the coal-hill known as La Charboniere. " 14 The whole community arrived at Florissant before the end of May and established themselves in the old government house, which John Mullanphy had turned over to them, rent free for a year. There were only three priests; Father Dunand, the Prior, Father Bernard Langlois and Father Ignatius. The Abbot was absent at the old home in Kentucky, to take care of the horses and the cattle, which he was to bring up to the new settlement. When he did arrive on the scene in November 1809, he found his com- munity shifted to the Illinois side, where Nicholas Jarrot had turned over the plantation of four hundred acres, with the big Mound and a number of smaller ones on it. But every member of the colony was attacked by typhoid fever. Dom Urban too had the fever when he arrived at 13 Spalding, "Sketches of Kentucky." 1* Spalding, "Sketches of Kentucky." Father Duiiand and His Trappist Brethren 225 Cahokia; and exhausted as he was by the long, most tiresome journey, he was further depressed by the news that the Prior was ill, and that the whole community was near death's door. Father Bernard, 15 two lay-brothers and the school boys, who had remained at Florissant, were expected to join them soon, as Dom Urban wrote to Bishop Plessis of Quebec an account of what had happened. The land given by Jarrot to Abbot Urban seems to have had a clouded title. In order to attain a confirmation from Congress and to solicit an extra grant on account of his school, Dom Urban went to Washington. On May 1st, 1810, he wrote about his purposes to Bishop Plessis: "You are right in thinking that four hundred acres are enough to keep us occupied for many years, they would be enough for ever, were we to limit our members to a very small community without educa- ting children. But, should Government reject our title, it will be necessary to move again." 10 Dom Urban writes that nothing was done by Congress in his favor, save that the title to the four hundred acres was confirmed. The Trappists remained at what was now called Monk's Mound nearly three years. They built a cluster of houses with a Church, which they called "Notre Dame de Bon Secours". Henry Brackenridge "the little English boy" of St. Genevieve, now grown to man's estate, in 1811 paid a visit to Monks Mound and left us an interesting, if not altogether just description of the Monastery and its inmates : "The buildings which the Trappists at present occupy, are merely temporary : they consist of four or five cabins, on a mound about fifty yards high, and which is perhaps one hundred and fifty feet square. Their other buildings, cribs, stables, etc., ten or fifteen in number, are scattered about on the plain below. I was informed that they intended to build on the terrace of the large mound ; this will produce a fine effect, it will be seen five or six miles across the plain, and from some points of view ten or twelve. They have about one hundred acres enclosed in three different fields, including the large mound, and several others. "On entering the yard, I found a number of persons at work, some hauling and storing away the crop of corn ; others, shaping timber for some intended edifice. The greater number were boys from ten to four- teen years of age. "I ascended the mound which contains the dwellings. This was nearly 25 feet in height : the ascent rendered easy by a slanting road. I wander- ]5 Father Bernard Langlois, a Canadian and Trappist, is sometimes confounded with Father Bernard de Limpach. is Abbot Urban to Bishop Plessis of Quebec, May 1, 1910 quoted by Garraghan in his ' ' Trappists of Monks Mound, ' ' 1. c, p. 88. Vol. 1-8 226 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis '•il about here for some time, in expectation of being noticed by some one; it was in vain that I nodded to the Reverend Fathers, or peeped into their cabins. I had the good fortune to be accosted by a young man, whom I discovered to be in their employment as a kind of steward, though not otherwise attached to the society. J experienced relief on being able to find one who was willing to speak : I made a variety of inquiries of him, but to very little purpose: he was however obliging, and promised to speak in my behalf to the Principal. In a short time Father Joseph made his appearance; I learned that he had the government of the monastery in the absence of Father Urban. He is a sprightly, and intelligent man, and, much to my surprise, talked with wonderful volu- bility, which excited in me almost as much surprise as Robinson Crusoe in his island felt, when his parrot addressed him. He invited me into the watchmaker's shop, for they carry on several trades, to assist in supporting the institution. The shop was well furnished ; part was occupied as a laboratory, and library ; the latter but indifferent ; a few medical works of no repute, and the dreams of the Fathers, with the miraculous winders of the w y orld of Saints. Several men were at work, and some boys busily employed. One poor fellow 7 , ten or twelve years of age, attracted my attention and pity. He was seated by a stove, making strokes on a slate, and appeared to have just risen from the bed of sickness, or rather from the tomb. Emaciated to the last extreme, his face was pale, cold and bloodless, his lips purpled, his sunken eve marked by a livid streak, and his countenance overspread with a listless stillness ... I was pleased when I saw T Father Joseph advance toward him with a tenderness and benignity of countenance, which does not belong to a monk : he endeavored to cheer him by speaking pleasantly to him, but the poor fellow had lost the power of smiling, his physiognomy was locked up in rigid coldness, which nothing but returning health, or the warmth of parental affection, could soften. "Father Joseph inquired whether I had dined, and being informed in the negative, had something prepared. My fare was simple, consisting chiefly of vegetables ; though not less acceptable ; for it was given with good will. Having returned thanks to the Father for his hospitality, I took my leave. I learned that the family of the Trappists consists of about eighty persons, a considerable number of whom are not at home. The boys are generally American, the men principally German and French. They expect a considerable accession from Europe. It is about a year since they have been fixed in this place. Last summer proved fatal to five or six, and few escaped the prevailing fever/' 17 17 Brackenridge, "Visit to Cahokia, in 1811," is quoted by Scliarf, "History of St. Louis," vol. I, p. 99. Father Dunand and His Trappist Brethren 227 Mr. Brackenridge 's little slurs on the Monk and the ' ' Dreams of the Fathers" and "the miraculous wonders of the world of saints" tend to lower our estimate of his fairness as an historian : yet in describing the things he saw, he gave true and vivid views. His opinions do not concern us. "At the time the Trappists established themselves in Illinois" says Bishop Spalding, "the Indian war of the Northwest was beginning to rage. It terminated in the full discomfiture of the savages, at the famous battle of Tippecanoe, on the 7th of November, 1811. It is a remarkable fact in the history of acoustics, that the Trappists distinctly heard the report of the cannon fired at Tippecanoe, though they were about two hundred miles distant from the scene of action. A peculiar state of the atmosphere, and the circumstance that the sound passed uninterrupted over immense level prairies, may enable us to account for this curious fact, which is stated on respectable authority." 18 is Spalding, ' ' Sketches of Kentucky. ' ' < Ihapter 14 !•' A T BEE Dl" N A X DTH E L( )N E M [SSIONAB V The wanderings of the early Trappists in America have been com- pared to those enshrined in the Odyssey of Homer. Mutatis mutandis, a certain resemblance may be admitted. Yet the quest for a new home was not without good results. Their nine years stay kept alive the faitli iu many thousands of souls scattered like sheep in the wilderness. It is true, they lost seven priests and eight lay-brothers by death : but as the bodily life was as nothing to them, compared with the life of the spirit, their failure seemed really a gain. It was not the American band of Trappists that shrunk from the task, but rather the brighter hopes of the General of their Order, that called them away to new and more promising fields. While all the members of the Order, both priests and lay brothers, thus returned to Europe, many of the young men who were attached to it, remained in America, generally devoting themselves to the trades they had learned among the Trappists. Among them were some men of distinction, as Mr. de Hodiamont, one of those who witnessed the saintly death of Father De Andreis. But, as in the expulsion of the Jesuits, Father Meurin remained behind to continue the work of his Order, so in the recall of the Trap- pists, Father Dunand obtained permission from his Superior to stay with the forlorn people of St. Charles, St. Ferdinand and the Barrens. During the decade from 1808 to 1818 the Parishes above St. Gen- evieve depended for the comforts of religion almost exclusively on the Trappists of Monks Mound. Father Maxwell was glad to have their assistance. On the Illinois side, there was only Father Olivier, with the accession, in 1812, of Father Francis Savine. It was probably through the influence of Bishop Flaget of Bardstown that Father Dunand, now universally called the Prior, was permitted to stay on the missions in Missouri until 1820. He seems to have resided, at first, in St. Charles, where there was a Church. In St. Ferdinand he was pastor in residence from 1814 to 1820. Florissant thus became, as Father Garraghan says, "the Foun- tain-head which dispensed spiritual aid to all the out-lying country." A number of the pioneer Churches were built through the Father Prior's exertions; at the Barrens, at Portage des Sioux, and Dardenne. 1 i Father Dunaud's Diary, in "Records of the American Catholic Historical Society," vol. XXVII, p. 45. (228) Father Dunand the Lone Missionary 229 Of the excellent Catholic Americans at the Barrens Father Dunand has given such a glowing account in his Journal that we feel obliged to transcribe it word for word : The first visit was made in 1814, to be followed by many more : "I arrived at the house of Mr. Tucker, a good Catholic who had eight sons and one daughter, all except the youngest married and settled about him in good homes. We had traveled a long time on this marshy ground, in fear every minute of sinking with our horses, and surrounded on all sides by wild beasts and enormous serpents. "But we were well repaid for all our trouble by the warm recep- tion of our excellent Catholic and his family. I inquired how they had passed their Sundays and holy days, without Mass. They answered that on these days all the families of the district assembled three times; the first time they recited the prayers of the Mass; the second time they recited the beads or other prayers and followed this by singing hymns and canticles; and the third time some one of the better instruct- ed taught catechism, not only to the children but to the married folks as well. I could not help admiring this beautiful arrangement, which the Holy Spirit who is the Spirit of righteousness and simplicity, has established among these pious planters, so simple and so free from malice. ' ' I imagined myself carried back to that blessed epoch of the birth of the Church. I fancied I saw those first Christians instructed by the Apostles and so united by their charity, that they were but one heart and one soul. I would have liked well to have remained with such good people and to have chosen this holy spot for my home, but Divine Providence called me elsewhere. However, I did not wish to leave these virtuous soids without giving them hope of again seeing me. Finally to preserve or increase, if such were possible the concord reigning amongst them. I advised them to build a church. "It is the one thing you lack," I said to them. "From it you will draw the greatest benefit. On Sundays you could all assemble there. Some one of your number of good reputation and who to piety adds an exact knowledge of his religion, could teach catechism or give some pious reading. You might chant the psalms, some canticles or hymns. All this would be a great aid to fervor and bulwark against Protestants who will not dare to attack you seeing you so well united. God, for His part, will bless you abundantly and when you are all assembled in His Name He will be pleased to be in your midst. I added as a last motive for their encouragement that, if they followed this advice I would return from time to time to visit them and celebrate for them the Holy Sacrifice. 1 then bade them good-bye and continued my •-'•'{O History of ilic Arrhdiocc si of St. Louis journey. Bui it' 1 was not with them in body, my hearl remained with them." 2 "On the following day they met to consider the building of a church. It was resolved to do so by common agreement. They chose a very beaut if id site. Beginning the next day. some prepared the materi- als, and others worked at its construction with such ardor, that in less than two months the edifice was under cover. There were two hundred workers. When it was in readiness M. Tucker knowing where I lived. came to remind me of my promise. T had been taxing my strength too much, for I had travelled over a region of more than three hundred and fifty leagues visiting various settlements in the Upper Louisiana. I likewise had gone to visit congregations beyond the Wisconsin; and this new foundation which was in the opposite direction presented fresh hardships. But I had pledged myself, and it was necessary to add this congregation to those I already attended, i held for these good peo- ple a feeling of affection that attracted me towards them. Nevertheless difficulties and dangers of travel caused a kind of repugnance. It was necessary to cross several rivers which were very dangerous when high. However, I overcame all these difficulties. I did not wish to show less courage than the good old man whom these obstacles had not hindered from coming to seek me. The journey was laborious, but their joy at seeing me in their midst rewarded me abundantly and induced me to return there several times." 3 "I was so well pleased with these good people that I have since returned there four times a year, although they are forty leagues from my parish. The good old Mr. Tucker received me in his home. One day on arriving there I found him ill. I administered the last sacraments to him and soon after he ended his days full of merit before God. He left some valuable donations to the Church in his will." 4 It was through the agency of Father Dunand that the first Theo- logical Seminary of St. Louis was located at the Barrens. But this good work will be duly treated when the proper occasion shall offer itself. There is an allusion in the foregoing account to a missionary trip of the Father Prior to Prairie du Chien at the junction of the Wiscon- sin River with the Mississippi. It may well be that Father Marquette's eye rested on the tongue of land whereon Prairie du Chien was to arise in later times. Certain it is that there was a settlement of whites at the place in early times. But of a Church or a missionary establishment there is no trace in history up to the year 1817, and the priest's name who 2 Dunand 's Diary, 1. e., p. 46. 3 Idem, ibidem, pp. 46 and 47. * Idem, ibidem, p. 48. Father Dunand the Lone Missionary 231 opened the Church Record with a large number of entries, and who opened and blessed a Cemetery and urged the building of a Church was our Father Prior, Joseph Dunand. 5 It was in March 1817, that Father Dunand set out from Florissant for Prairie du Chien, at the urgent in- vitation of the French Catholics who lived at that remote point. The journey was by canoe : five men did the rowing, one the steering. Father Dunand graphically describes the sufferings sustained from cold and storm and privations of all kinds. Thus he continues: "Every evening when we had put to land to pass the night the savages came to visit us ; after they had gotten warmed up a little the chief came and gave me his hand, as did also the leaders among them. I flung them a piece of tobacco to mollify them, as they still were dangerous, although peace had been made. "The thirty-fourth day from the time of my departure after great fatigue and hardships we reached the place where we sought to carry the light of faith. I was heartily welcomed by the people who had invited me to pay them this visit. The Commander of the fort, although a Protestant, honored me with a visit and offered me his services. I lived one month among these people who, until then, had been entirely abandoned. I administered holy Baptism to a great many, large and small, among whom there were many half-breeds and savages. In short, all day I was occupied in the exercise of the holy ministry. Three per- sons only refused to profit by my visit. Protestants came every day to the instructions; even the Jews were converted. The savages of dif- ferent nations were exact in attendance of Mass; the savage women brought me their children in groups, some to be baptized, others that they might behold a Makita Courage; that is to say, a black-robe." 6 Dreadful things were witnessed by the good Prior on this journey through the Country devastated by years of Indian warfare ; and even then cruelties were perpetrated that made his stout heart quail : "One day when again going up the Mississippi I arrived with my canoe and the men who accompanied me near a house which the savages had set afire and where some horrible cruelties had been com- mitted,. The father and mother whom they had scalped were lying dead before the door. Besides this, they had massacred seven children, most of them girls. The largest one they had put on the hearth of the chimney to serve as a log; two they had placed as andirons, two above crosswise and the two smallest in a kettle in which some one was mak- ing soap. The house was on fire when we arrived. I shuddered with fear lest the savages might still be there ; but a domesticated savage ■"> The Catholic Church in Wisconsin, pp. 850-852. " Idem, ibidem, p. 57 s. •_':!■_' History of thi Archdiocesi of St. Louis who accompanied me reassured me by saying that, from whal they bad done On a similar occasion, it was safe to assume that they had promptly withdrawn. With much confusion, 1 reviewed this burning house and the bloody corpses, when a sight, sadder still, at least more apt to excite pity, caught my eye. A poor old man, nearly sixty-five years of age, came before me having been scalped and left for dead by the savages. "Father Joseph," lie said to me, "save my soul! save my soul!" (speak- ing in the English language). We took all possible care of him and he became some better, but at the end of a few days he died." 7 Prairie i]u Chien lay in the very center of these Indian disturbances, and Father Dunand naturally dwelt on them in his Diary at greater length. We will give one more incident to show in what a hopeless condition the greater part of Northern Illinois found itself just before the dawn of its christianization : "One day two Americans fell into their hands," writes Father Dunand, "and lest they might escape, they brought them to a savage village. While their fate was being decided they were laid on their backs on the earth; then their four exti'emities were stretched out fastened to four pegs driven very deep into the ground. One was condemned to be boiled in a large kettle and after- wards eaten ; the other was to be roasted alive before the fire over which the pot was boiling which contained his companion. The first having been disembowelled was torn to pieces and crammed into the kettle ; the other was stripped of his clothes and led before the fire from which the flames rose more than six feet. The Indians, weapons in hand, formed a circle round him that he might not escape. The women were in front, each holding in her hand a pointed stick with which to prod the unfortunate man and to oblige him to turn towards the fire. It is worthy of note that under such circumstances the women are far more cruel than the men. One of the women had her child in her arms. She was the most vicious of all. The poor creature who was thus toast- ing, unable to bear such cruel torture conceived the idea of making them kill him at once ; and for this purpose grabbed her child and flung it in the pot with his companion. Seeing this, the savages clapping their hands to their mouths, cried out: "He is a hero! He is a hero! and the mother of the child coming forward adopted him as her son; in this way he was spared ; but on condition that he recognize as his mother her whose child he had thrown into the pot. One need not be astonished at this, for it is the custom among these people for the woman to adopt as her husband or son him who has been the murderer, if he is caught. This is the almost invariable rule." 8 " Dunand 's Diary, 1. <■., \>. <>n. Mem, ibidem, p. 54. Father Dunand tltt Lont Missionary 233 But. sad to say. continues Father Dunand. "There are. among these natives some white men more inhuman than the aborigines. The following story gives one instance of this. One day two young Amer- ican girls, about eighteen years of age, fell into the hands of some Indians who carried them off to their cam]). It is easier to imagine than to describe what was the fright and shock of these girls at the sisrht of these wild men, thirsty for blood and always ready to shed it. How- ever, whether they were moved by the tears of these two unfortunates. or whether they were induced by some prospective interest, they decided to sell them to some white traders. While awaiting the arrival of the merchants who must have been at some great distance, they placed the two young women by the side of a fire. There they kept them, trembling from head to foot, more dead than alive, when a white man living among the natives approached one of them with a knife in his hand; and hav- ing laid her breast bare with violence, cut it off and roasted it. The natives were horrified at such barbarity; they pursued the monster to kill him, but he hid himself. Meanwhile the poor victim of so horrible a deed was stretched on the ground bathed in her own blood and over- cast with the pallor of death. A savage, bending over her said: "My poor girl, we did not wish to kill thee, but since thou hast lost so much blood and cannot escape death, I will do thee a kindness." With these words he cleaved the head from the body with his hatchet. A merchant bought the other and returned her to her parents. I learned this tragic- story from those who were themselves spectators to it." : ' Such were the prevailing conditions in all the northern portion of the diocese of St. Louis before the coming of Bishop Du Bourg and his missionary band of 1818. s Dunand 's Diary, 1. c, pp. 55 and 56. PART ONE THE ERA OF PREPARATION BOOK III The Church of St Louis Under Bishop Du Bourg of Louisiana BOOK III Chapter 1 BISHOP LOUIS WILLIAM VALENTIN DU BOURG The twenty days from November 30th, 1803, to December 20th, 1803, were fateful for three great nations, France, Spain and the United States. On the first date Spain retroceded to France the province of Louisiana, she had received from France forty years previous ; and on the latter date the United States acquired possession of the same province of Louisi- ana, bought from France, for the sum of fifteen million of dollars. All Louisiana was now a territory of the great western republic. Fifty thousand souls, mostly of the Catholic faith, had been added to the struggling Church of America. The change had come so suddenly, un- expectedly, that no one could realize the full meaning of the event. It was the birth of a new and glorious period not only for liberty and progress but for religion as welL It was not so plain then, as it is today, that the unification of the country, under the benign principles of the American Constitution, would cause an ever-widening stream of immigration to flow in and invigorate the Church and make it the mighty, self-sustaining body we behold with joy and pride. But the Louisiana Purchase was, under God's Providence, the beginning of this wonderful change. As the death of Father Patrick Walsh, Vicar General of New Orleans, left the diocese of Louisiana without ecclesiastical government, Bishop Carroll of Baltimore resolved to act under the Decree of September 1st, 1805, and assume the administration. He appointed Father John Olivier, who had been at Cahokia till 1803, and was now Chaplain of the Ursu- lines at New Orleans, his Vicar-General for Louisiana. There was one man in the episcopal city, a man of great influence, who would not recog- nize the new authority, Father Antonio de Sedella. 1 The character of this Capuchin Monk is still an enigma. The people of New Orleans loved and received him, as one that stood in highest grace with Heaven, whilst he himself was continually opposing those whom the Church placed in authority. It is said that he was a Free-mason and at the same time an 1 Cf. Gassier, F. L., "Pere Antoine, Supremo Officer of the Holy Inquisition of Cartagena, in Louisiana," in "Catholic Historical Review," New Series, vol. II, pp. 5&-63. Also vol. TV. Old Series, pp. 52-75. (237) 238 History of tin Archdiocesi of St. Louis officer of the Spanish [nquisition. There can be no doubt, that tie was a man of great powers of mind and of a domineering character. Bishop Du Bourg at one time called him the "inimicus homo," and at another, proposed him to Rome for the office of his coadjutor. Father Sedella w r as certainly not a "homo ecelesiae" whatever else he may have been. He held the position of Pastor of the Cathedral at New Orleans, with two assistants wdiose character was under a cloud. Vicar General Olivier endeavored to abate the scandal, but met only stubborn resistance. Bishop Carroll in a letter to James Madison, then Secretary of State, bares the secret of his long delay in taking effective action. He had been informed by Cardinal Pietro, that "the acquiescence of the American government is necessary with respect to the measures to be adopted for settling the ecclesiastical state of Louisiana." 2 But the only persons for the difficult position of Bishop in those newly acquired parts of the United States were Frenchmen, who would probably not be acceptable to the Government, especially as Napoleon was known to be meddling with these same affairs. The unwarranted course of action of the French Government proceeded from the efforts of some Louisiana politicians headed by that "artful Spanish Friar, Antonio de Sedella," who sent a special mission to obtain a recommendation from the Emperor Napoleon for the immediate nomination of de Sedella to the bishopric. "But, the attempt has completely miscarried," wrote Bishop Carroll. This would throw some light on the motives of Father Antonio in his entire course of rebellion. Mr. Madison, of course, had no suggestion to offer, no criti- cism to make, but expressed perfect confidence in the patriotism of the Bishop of Baltimore. Cardinal Antonelli's suggestion was, that Father Charles Nerinckx should be sent to New Orleans with the rank of Ad- ministrator Apostolic and the "rights of an Ordinary," but the humble and rather diffident missionary would not listen to any such proposal. Father Lespinasse also was considered, and lastly Father Benedict Flaget. As the troubles in New Orleans became more harassing from day to day, Bishop Carroll bethought himself of the man that seemed entirely fitted for the magnificent opportunity of bringing order out of chaos in Louisi- ana, and place the Church there on the way of triumphant progress. Tt was the Sulpician Father William Valentin Louis Du Bourg, one-time President of Georgetown College, and Founder of St. Mary's Seminary, and other institutions of learning and piety. 3 Father Du Bourg was a native of the Island of Santo Domingo, the place where the holy sacrifice was first celebrated in America after its discovery by Christopher Columbus. The date of his birth was February 2 Guilday, "Life and Times of John Carroll," p. 707. 3 Letter of Appointment as Administrator Apostolic, signed by Cardinal Antonelli and Archbishop Carroll of Baltimore in Archives of St. Louis Archdiosese, printed in "Catholic Historical Review," vol. TV, p. 56. Bishop Louis William Valentin Du Bourg 239 4th, 1766, twenty-five years before the terrible uprising of the blacks drove the French colonists from the island. Cape Francois, was the place of his birth, though not the scene of his childhood, as he was taken, two years old, to Bordeaux, the former home of his family in France. He made his classical and philosophical studies in the College of Guyenne in Bordeaux, and then went to Paris for the study of Theology. On October 12th, 1786, he entered the Grand Seminary of St. Sulpiee and remained there for two years. Owing to the troubles of the period, the Registers of Ordinations were lost, and so, the date of young Du Bourg 's admission to the sacred orders is not known. It was probably in his twenty-third year that he became a priest, that is in the Fall of 1788. His first posi- tion was that of a Professor in the College of Issy. But signs of the time were ominous, both to throne and altar. On August 1792, it became clear to the priests at the College that they must fly for safety. Father Du Bourg escaped to Bordeaux dis- guised as a minstrel with violin in his arm. His journey to Spain lasted from August 11th to September 3rd. In 179-1 he embarked for Baltimore, where he arrived December 14th. He was here admitted into the Sulpi- cian Community, on March 9th, 1795. In Baltimore the young Sulpician took truly Christian revenge for the sins of the negro race against his people of St. Domingo by devoting a good part of his time and energy to the instruction of the negroes and negresses in their holy religion. From September 20th, 1796, Father Du Bourg was President of Georgetown College. Early in January 1799 he went to Havana for the purpose of founding a College ; but as he met violent opposition from the clergy of Havana, he returned to Baltimore in August of the same year. Here he founded a College for boys, which in the course of time became the Seminary of St. Mary's Baltimore, with himself as President. One of his early triumphs was the part he took in the establishment of the Sisters of Charity, commonly called ' ' Mother Seton 's Daughters, ' ' in 1809, and in the foundation of their Mother-house at Emmitsburg. Maryland, in 1811. Mrs. Seton, or Eliza Ann Bayley, was one of the noblest converts the American Church has ever gained. After the death of her husband, she felt that her vocation was the instruction of youth, but for a time she could not come to a practical decision. The religious life was her ideal, and yet her children had every claim upon her motherly care. It was Du Bourg 's guiding and helping hand that enabled Mrs. Seton to combine her seemingly conflicting duties into one great undertaking for God's honor: the establishment of the new religious community of teaching sisters: "Mother Seton 's Daughters." From these apostolic labors and triumphs it can be clearly seen, that Du Bourg was a man of uncommon gifts of intellect and character, and 240 History of thi Archdiocese of St. Louis well able and deserving to fill the most exalted positions in the Church. Accordingly, Bishop Carrol] on A.ugus1 L8th, 1812 appointed him "Ad- ministrator Apostolic of the Diocese of Louisiana and the Two Floridas." This, of course, included all the territory west of the Mississippi and easl of the Rocky Mountains, from the gulf to Canada. .\cw Orleans. the former episcopal city was to he the seat of the new Administrator Apostolic. "The new Administrator. " as .John (i. Shea says, ''was a brilliant and learned man. but lacked courage and firmness." To these undeniable defects of Dr. Du Bourg's character St. Louis owes a number of very important institutions, which in the natural course of events ought to have gone to the older and more important city of New Orleans. This good came out of the evil thai Father Antonio did, and the one weakness of Dr. Du Bourg's character helped to bring untold bless ings to St. Louis. But we musl treat all these events in an orderly manner. The diocese of Lower and Upper Louisiana was, indeed, vastly rich in territory, but extremely poor in every other respect: sparsely peopled, the settlements widely scattered, the parishes disorganized, and the clergy greatly reduced in number and in discipline. "Many Catholics died without the sacraments," as a note of Propaganda states, "many children are unbaptized; others scarcely see a priest once only in a life time, marriages are contracted without the Church's blessing, and Chris- tian doctrine is not taught, and such a decay of Christian life is to be observed, that within a few years the Catholic faith will he entirely obliterated." 4 New Orleans is described as a hotbed of unbelief and moral cor- ruption, owing to a greal extent, to the efforts of the Freemasons, and other adherents of the godless philosophy of Voltaire, but above all "to the scandals given by some of the clergy." Add to these anxieties the fact that an English army under Packen- ham stood at the gates of the city ready to carry it by storm. General Jackson won the victory, and Dr. Du Bourg's brave and patriotic conduct during the threatening danger, won him the respect of the victorioiis General and of the saner part of the people of the city. Even Father Antonio yielded a kind of recognition to the Administrator's authority."' But now there fell another sorrow to Father Du Bourg's lot. His good priests were dying, four of them, within eighteen months, only ten re- mained, three of them very old and decrepit. ^ Souvay in "Catholic Historical Review," vol. IV, p. 53. • r > Dr. Du Bourj,' preached an eloquent patriotic senium at the Thanksgiving services for the victory of General Jackson. Bishop Louis William Valentin Du Bourg 241 For three Ion"' years the Administrator Apostolic bore the burdens of an almost hopeless cause. The war with England was over, and the way to Rome, the Seat of the Holy Father, lay open. Why not appeal to Him for help, or for relief from his terrible burden? More laborers for the vineyard, and larger means for their support were the things he hoped for; his recall from Louisiana to private life was what he was prepared for. On April 29th, 1815 Dr. Du Bourg announced his intention of going to Europe in the interest of the Diocese, and the appointment of Rev. Louis Sibourd as his Vicar General to adminster the Diocese during his absence. In this announcement the Administrator Apostolic stated that he had all the necessary faculties for this appointment. This roused the fighting spirit of Father Sedella. He demanded to be shown the letter of Du Bourg 's appointment, and the special faculties received; "other- wise," he said, "neither my honor nor my ministry allow me to comply with your ordinance." Dr. Du Bourg immediately complied with the Capuchin Father's impertinent request, by sending copies of the Ponti- fical Brief signed by Cardinal Antonelli, the letter of Bishop Carroll of Baltimore, which conferred upon Dr. Du Bourg the quality of "Adminis- trator Apostolic with the rights of an Ordinary." And not content with this he entered upon a lenghty argument with a man who would not be convinced. Father Antonio's reply was a simple denial of all his Superior had written. Strange to say, the Administrator Apostolic returned to the charge in a letter dated May 3rd, 1815: The argument is clear, concise and convincing. Its dignified tone must have made some impres- sion on the Pastor of the Cathedral of New Orleans, if the argument failed its purpose. Yet, the day of departure was at hand. On the 4th, day of March, Monseigneur Du Bourg sailed for Europe, no doubt, sorely beset by dark omens as to what might be done by the "inimicus homo." Landing at Bordeaux, in July, 1815, shortly after the battle of Waterloo, when all France was in turmoil, he could not proceed on his journey to Rome for some time. He therefore, wrote to Cardinal Litta, Prefect of Propaganda, that he had set out from Louisiana on an "ad limina" visit to the holy Apostles, for the purpose of submitting to the Holy See, the wretched condition of the diocese entrusted to his care ; but that, owing to the disturbed condition of Europe, he was obliged to postpone his visit, perhaps for a long time. After this introduction Monseigneur Du Bourg broaches his com- plaint against Father Sedella who refused to recognize the Vicar General duly appointed, a man of remarkable piety and prudence. The Adminis- trator finally begged for a recognition of Father Sibourd 's appointment, pointing out the necessity to abstain, for prudential reasons, from any reference to Father Antonio. The Cardinal Prefect may have thought, that a little more firmness on the part of Monseigneur Du Bourg toward 242 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis, the recalcitranl Capuchin would have served his cause much better than this appeal to Rome. Of course, Dr. Du Bourg was supported in his contention with Father Anthony; and Archbishop Carroll was requested to notify the Catholics of Louisiana to this effect. Father de Sedella there- upon ceased to exercise the jurisdiction he had usurped; but did not cease to make trouble for the Bishop. The Administrator Apostolic was received in audience by Pope Pius VII, who listened with lively interest to all that the American Prelate had to saj r about his hopes and fears for Louisiana. Men and means for a grand effort must be provided otherwise all is lost. The Holy Father assured him of his assistance. Dr. Du Bourg received the appointment as Bishop of Louisiana and the Floridas and was consecrated in the Church of St. Louis of the French, September 24th, 1815. The consecrating Prelate was Cardinal Joseph Doria. Father Felix de Andreis whom Dr. Du Bourg had met at the Lazarist Home of Monte Citorio, witnessed the solemn act. Bishop Du Bourg, as was his wont, gave way to his enthusi- astic zeal by appealing to the Superior of the Lazarists, Father Sicardi, for the very best missionary he had, Father Felix de Andreis. At the very time of Dr. Du Bourg 's arrival, De Andreis was giving a mission in Rome, with such remarkable fervor and success that the Prelate's mind was made up at once : Him I must have for the mission or none other. Father Sicardi, however, was altogether unwilling to let him go to Louisiana. But, Bishop Du Bourg, feeling that the success of his own undertaking depended on the saintly priest, not only continued his im- portunities with Father Sicardi, but also enlisted the powerful inter- cession of Cardinal Consalvi, the Pope's Secretary of State, and at last appealed to the Holy Father himself. Father Sicardi yielded to the wishes of the martyr Pope, although with a heavy heart, and in an interview with Cardinal Consalvi on the 27th of December, made all the necessary arrangements with a view of the erection of a Seminary in Bishop Du Bourg 's almost boundless diocese. Father De Andreis' delight was not unmingled with fear, that he might prove unworthy of the call. The thought of his dearest friend. Father Rosati, a member of the same community, but then absent from Rome, occurred to him. He, the teacher, had several years previous, spoken to his disciple, that he should learn English, as they were to be sent one day to a mission where they would need that language. Remembering this, Father De Andreis wrote to Rosati, asking him whether he would accompany him on the mission to Louisiana. Father Rosati answ-ered : yes, he would. Several other priests and clerical students volunteered for the mission, Father John B. Acquaroni among the number. On October 14, 1815, the first band of American missionaries were ready to depart with the blessing of the Holy Father, and on the night of the 21st, Bishop Louis William Valentin Du Bourg 243 they embarked for Marseilles under the leadership of Rosati, there to await the coming of Father De Andreis who was detained for the time in Rome. Many gifts in the form of vestments, altar-plate, linens, books, and money, were made to the new mission. On the 15th of December, Father De Andreis also took his departure from his brethren at Monte Citorio in company with Francis X. Dahmen, the future Pastor of Ste. Genevieve. They took the over-land route to Bordeaux, touching at Piacenca, where he was joined by the everfaithful Brother Blanka, and touching at Turin and Montpellier, on the 30th of January, 1817 ar- rived at Bordeaux. Here they were most kindly received by the venerable Archbishop whose guest De Andreis remained for four months and a half during the collection-tour of Bishop Du Bourg. The little community under Father De Andreis at Bordeaux repre- sented only the first fruits of the new Bishop's endeavors. At Rome he had received a gift of six hundred scudi from the Propaganda. "What other sums he collected in Italy we do not know : yet they must have been considerable. But what cheered him most, were the new members of his missionary band he recruited in Milan, namely a pious association of priests and students under Father John Mary Rossetti, Of these, Joseph Tichitoli accompanied the Bishop : the others, Father Marcellus Borella, John Rosti, John Bosoni, Peter Vergani, Angelo Mascaroni, and Joseph Pifferi, followed later, and labored in various capacities in the Dioceses of St. Louis and New Orleans. At Lyons Bishop Du Bourg encouraged some pious ladies to form an association for the support of the missions, which in after days was known as the "Association for the Propagation of the Faith," and which for many years was the main-stay of the Church in Louisiana. But whilst all this was sufficiently encouraging, there was a dark cloud overhanging all the Bishop 's hopes in New Orleans. ' ' The news which I received from New Orleans" he writes to Cardinal Dugnani, on April 11th, "were such as to almost make me give up the whole undertaking. The enemy, on hearing of my appointment, renewed and multiplied his perfidious wiles. There is now question of having the State Legislature pass a law placing my temporalities under the absolute control of the men most strenuously opposed to Episcopal authority ; and so heated are the minds of the party, that my friends entertain fears about my personal safety, should I appear in the city. Your Eminence may easily realize what distress such news caused me. I must say candidly that I came very near beseeching His Holiness to take away from my shoulders a burden which, in circumstances such as these, appeared to me simply unbearable. 6 A good and sufficient account of this period of Du Bourg 's life may tie found in the "Life of Felix De Andreis," by Bishop Joseph Rosati, pp. 51-72. 2i-i History of the Archdiocese of 8t. Louis Unbearable it would be, indeed, Your Eminence, for the most courageous and fearless Bishop, if he were obliged to settle in the City of New Orleans, or even in Lower Louisiana, which is almost entirely under the influence of that wretched Religious. Nothing at all can be hoped there as long as that man is living. However, I feel how essential it is, not to give up the hope of bringing back some day by dint of meekness, that part of the Diocese under submission to Episcopal author- ity. But this consideration itself positively forbids exposing the Bishop to an uneven struggle, the inevitable result of which can be only the loss of the respect due to his dignity. I see but one means of reconciling all the interests at stake, and I beg Your Eminence kindly to propose this means to the Cardinal Prefect and to the Sacred Congregation : it is, that I should, for the time being establish my See in Upper Louisiana, namely at St. Louis. Apart from the peremptory motive which brought this idea to my mind, several other reasons seem sufficiently strong to recommend this measure. In order that I may work thoroughly for the good of my Dio- cese, I must establish a Seminary and primary schools; these new establishments ought to be, until they are solidly grounded, under the immediate and constant supervision of the Bishop. Now everything is against their being located in Lower Louisiana, whereas everything looks favorable to their happy development, if they be in Upper Louisi- ana: in the one place, morality is at an incredibly low ebb, it remains untainted in the other ; in the one, the air is unsalubrious, it is pure and healthy in the other ; in the one, real estate and living are very high, they are very cheap in the other. In case I were to settle in Upper Louisiana, I would appoint only a Vicar General at New Orleans, request His Holiness, through the Sacred Congregation, to grant him the faculty to administer, as I would deem fit, the Sacrament of Confirmation, as the immense distance between the place of my residence and Lower Louisiana would prevent my betaking me thither to fulfill this august function of my Order. In this case, too, it would be necessary to postpone indefinitely the carrying into execution of the project which I have suggested to the Sacred Congregation touching the dismemberment of Upper Louisiana from my Diocese and its creation into a new Diocese." 7 Bishop Du Bourg did not wait for an answer from Propaganda, before taking measures according to this plan. Less than two weeks after writing to Cardinal Dugnani, he made known to Father De Andreis his change of plans. He no longer intended that they should proceed to Xew Orleans, but to St. Louis, which is on the banks of the Mississippi River, about twelve hundred miles inland. The advantages of this change "J Archives of Propaganda, printed by Souvay in "Catholic Historical Re- view," vol. IV, p. 63. Bishop Louis William Valentin Du Bourg 245 were great, both for the Catholics of that region, and for the Indians, who are far more numerous and more easily reached at St. Louis, than at New Orleans. So the first House of the Mission and its Seminary should be built there. But, as English and French were spoken at St. Louis, it would be necessary that the missionaries should learn English. The change of base surprised, but could not discourage Father De Andreis and his companions. "Now then," said he, "Let us take courage, gentlemen, I see that the English language will indeed be indispensable to us." Father Rosati recalled what Father De Andreis had told him some years before at Rome : that the English language would, one day, be necessary for both." 8 In the fulfilment of this prediction Father Rosati saw another proof of the fact that De Andreis was "a living saint." On the eve of the Ascension, May 22nd, Bishop Du Bourg arrived at Bordeaux with his band of young men, ecclesiastic and laymen, all anxious for their departure. The company was divided into two bands, the first one under the leadership of Vicar General De Andreis, and comprising Fathers Rosati, Acquaroni, priests of the Congregation of the Missions, then Fathers Caretti and Ferrari, secular priests from Porto Mauritio, Francis Xavier Dahmen, Joseph Tichitoli, Leo Deys, and Casto Gonzalez, Seminarians, Brother Martin Blanka, of the Con- gregation of the Missions, and three young laymen, who had expressed their intention of becoming brothers. The missionaries embarked on the American brig Ranger, on June 12th, after a touching farewell from Bishop Du Bourg. But the next day being Corpus Christi, and the ship being unable to sail, all returned to land, where Father Andreis cele- brated Mass and gave Holy Communion to all. Soon after their return to the ship, a favorable wind sprung up, and the proud ship that bore the hope of the western world, started on its voyage. For more than two months this stout little ocean craft was to be their home, their temple, their Seminary. The Captain and crew, as well as the only other pas- senger, were non-catholics, but most respectful in their behavior. Mass was said almost every day by one or the other of the priests; prayers were said in common, lectures on Theology were given regularly, and the study of the English language was pursued with a zeal commensurate to the cause. Father Rosati had also received the powers of Vicar General, but was not to use them, save in case Father De Andreis should become incapa- citated. Thus the long and otherwise tedious voyage became a fit preparation for the great work awaiting the missionaries. 8 ' ' Life of Father Felix De Andreis, ' ' pp. 85 and 86. The best part of this chapter is taken, frequently verbatim, from the excellent article of Dr. Ch. Souvay, C. M., in vol. IV of "Catholic Historical Review," p. 52 ss. 246 History of the Archdiocest of St. Louis Land was sighted on the 23rd, of July. On the 26th, the company landed at Baltimore. It was the Octave of the Feast of St. Vincent de Paul. Father De Andreis tells us with what delight he first beheld the land of his future labors. But hungry and way-worn, as the missionaries were, they sought the hospitable home of Father Simon Brute "the most holy, learned, humble and affable man, I ever knew." as Father De Andreis styles the President of the Seminary of St. Mary's. The Sulpician Fathers did everything possible to make all the immigrants feel at home in America. Meanwhile Father De Andreis wrote to his Superior in Rome about their safe arrival, and to Archbishop Carroll asking for faculties in his diocese, and lastly to Bishop Flaget at Bards- town asking for information respecting the remainder of the journey. Bishop Flaget advised an early start for Pittsburg, and promised all possible assistance. />/«• (^Ch^^ CW-^ SIGNATURES OF THE PIONEERS Chapter 2 CHURCH-GOVERNMENT BY MARGUILLIERS Although the government of the Church is vested in the sacred ministry, the Pope, the bishops, and the pastors, in their respective spheres, the care of the temporalities, under certain circumstances, may devolve on the laity. There is nothing contrary to Catholic principles in the system of Church-wardens, trustees, or as the French expressed it, marguilliers, having the care and control of the property of a parish. Under the French and Spanish regimes this system seems to have caused no friction, a circumstance that may be ascribed to the fact that the power of the marguilliers, was circumscribed by the civil authority. The state paid fixed salaries to the clergy and contributed towards the erection and repair of the Church-buildings. When March 10, 1804 the flags of Spain and of France in St. Louis were almost simultaneously lowered, and the flag of the United States was hoisted to announce that Upper Louisiana had become American territory, the union of Church and State, that had obtained under French and Spanish rule, was at an end, and the Church was free to act as it saw proper, but also found itself thrown upon its own resources. The property of the Church remained with the Church-organizations as represented by the marguil- liers, or board of trustees. The office of marguillier was elective. It was the duty of these wardens, generally four in number, to collect all church-dues, to engage the lower officers, as the chanter, and sacristan, to keep the property in repair, and to pay the priests' salary. The appointment of the priest or pastor belonged to the Bishop. Bishop Peiialver left his position at New Orleans at the close of the Spanish regime. Most of the priests of Louisiana also departed with the Spanish authorities. Only, Father Maxwell of St. Genevieve, Father Olivier at Kaskaskia, and possibly Father Gibault at New Madrid re- mained behind. St. Louis had no priest of its own, but only occasional visits of Fathers Maxwell and Olivier. Under these circumstances it was quite natural that the people through their wardens took charge of the temporalities of the Church and even went so far as to engage a wandering priest, Father Flynn, as their cure, pro. tern. Parish meetings were held once a year, but might be called at any time, if circumstances warranted action. Through the watchful care of Bishop Rosati the "Register of the lie solutions; of the Parish Meetings hell in the Parochial Residence of (247) 248 History of tfn Archdiocest of St. Louis St. I. inns, from 1806 to 1830" ] were preserved for us. This Register gives us a fairly good idea as i<> the manner to which the temporal affairs of the Church were transacted during that period of transition. The very first item in t he book under date of February Kith, 1806, contains a complaint in regard to the sad condition of the Church, the ceiling joists being in a state of advanced decay, and an order to the warden in charge to have the roof repaired and the building whitewashed inside and outside, out of the funds of the Church. A reprimand is applied to Mr. Bernard Pratte for having delayed the work on the roof. Under date of the 16th, and 23rd, day of 180G the engagement of Father Thomas Plynn's spiritual services is recorded. - After this entry there seems to have come a pause in the transactions until January 21st, 1810, when the election of Antonio Soulard as church warden and of Pierre Chouteau as deputy warden is recorded. As no accounting for the year 1S0S had been made by Warden M.Didier, such an accounting of Church-funds was ordered. "It was further unanimously resolved that the Tariff must henceforth be paid in specie : in consequence it will be diminished by one half, except for the sexton, to whom a piaster (one dollar) will be allowed for a large grave, and seventy five sols (cents) for a small one. It was also resolved that the annual salary of the chanter will be reduced to sixty piasters in place of one hundred and twenty. The rent for the pews will also be payable in piasters, by [•educing the price by one half, and they will henceforth be computed in specie." 3 On July 22nd, 1810 the following inventory of articles belonging to the Church of St. Louis was recorded : A silver monstrance ; two chalices and their patens; a eiborium and its cover in gold; two silver cruets: two boxes of sacred oil and its case of red velvet, and one in tin for the Host ; sixteen brass candleholders and ten in wood ; two buffets ; a small box containing a silver plate ; two canopies ; an ivory crucifix in a gilt frame out of repair, a pillow of black plush ; a bad carpet ; a missal and its stand ; a gradual ; a Gospel-book ; three antiphon books ; a censer ; a banner; a brass crucifix; a lead crucifix; a brass dish for the cruets: two small bells for the Mass ; an incense box for the incense and the spoon ; a large flambeau on a triangle in wood ; a little kettle ; a holy water font in marble mounted on a wooden stand ; an armchair ; benches ; chairs ; altar cards, three inferior cassocks; two good cassocks; five gowns of cloth; seven cleric surplices; three altar cards; a tin lantern; eight albs; two old square caps; two albs; eight large surplices; a table; three Com- munion cloths; six altar cloths; four napkins for the blessed bread, a veil; six amices; eight burses; a chalice case; twenty-one purificators ; 1 Archives of the Archdiocese of St. Louis. 2 Cf. Chapter 2 of Book II, of this history. ;t Shaved deerskins seem to have been discounted 50%. Church-Government of Marguilliers 249 fifteen corporals; ten finger towels; a box and a few ribbons; a chalice case; two girdles; a rng; a pall; four altar laces; a surplice; thirteen chasubles, with stoles, maniples and veils; three copes; a pascal candle and flambeau ; two altar stones ; a box of candles ; a bell for the belfry and cord ; a lantern in church ; a heater belonging to Mr. Didier ; a ladder ; a host iron ; a portable piece. These articles of the above inventory were in the care of the warden in charge. St. Louis, July 22nd, 1810. "On February 17th, 1812 the majority of the faithful of this parish being assembled at the parsonage elected 'M. Antoine D. Enjen as warden by a majority of thirty-one votes.' " "On the same day it was unanimously decided that on St. John's day, the coming June, all the pews of the Church will be put up for sale and adjudged in piasters and not otherwise. It was further agreed that the salary of the Cure will be one hundred and seventy-five piasters per annum, and a residence in the parsonage. On the motion concerning the salary of the sexton it was resolved that the sum of fifty sols (cents) shall be allowed him for each house, which sum will be paid him by the proprietors of said houses who are Catholics." "The warden in charge was ordered to apportion as justly as pos- sible, the sum required for the priest's salary of 175 among the various families of the parish." The Cure mentioned here was Father Francis Savine. On January 14th, 1813 the parishioners elected Samuel Solomon as warden for 1814, and assistant to the warden of the present year, Antoine D 'Enjen. In 1812, Father William Du Bourg was sent by Bishop Carroll to New Orleans as Administrator Apostolic of the Diocese of Louisiana and the Floridas. This included all the territory west of the Mississippi and east of the Rocky Mountains. St. Louis, therefore, came under the jurisdiction of the Administrator Apostolic, soon to be made Bishop Du Bourg of Upper and Lower Louisiana. On November 14th, 1813 the parishioners of St. Louis appointed a Committee for the purpose of asking the Bishop for a resident priest. The members were : August Chouteau, Charles Gratiot, Gregoire Sarpy. Bernard Pratte and Andre Landreville. On January 9th, of the following year, Antoine Saugrain was elected Warden for 1815, and assistant to Samuel Solomon, the warden for 1814. It was on May 29th, 1814 the Father Francis Savine, Cure of Cahokia obliged himself to discharge the spiritual duties as Cure of the Church of St. Louis every third Sunday until the end of April 1815, a promise that was extended to October 1817, when Father Henry Pratte 250 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis came up from St. Genevieve to prepare the place for Bishop I)u Bourg's coming. On January 8th, lSlf) Patrick Lee was elected assistant warden of Antoine Saugrain the warden in charge. On February 25th, 1816 Bapliste Beleour was elected warden for 1817, and assistant of Patrick Lee, warden for the present year. On January 12th, 1817, Antoine Chenier was elected warden for 1818, and assistant to Baptiate Beleour, warden for 1817. On January 4th, 1818 Bernard Sarpy was elected warden for 1819, and assistant to Antoine Chenier warden for the present year. On the following day, January 5th, 1818 Bishop Du Bourg, in company with the Bishop of Bardstown, was to enter his quasi episcopal city of St. Louis in triumphal procession. There is no further parish- meeting mentioned in the Register until February 16th, 1819 in obedience to Bishop Du Bourg's call. But the only resolution passed by the parish- ioners was "to sell the old Church, that the profit may be used for pay- ing a part of the debts contracted for the construction of the new." We shall see in a future chapter how the system of Church wardens gradually proved its incapacity for constructive work and was finally brushed aside by the businesslike Peter Richard Kenrick. Chapter 3 BISHOP FLAGET 'S INTEREST IN ST. LOUIS Whilst the little army of the Lord was being brought together and equipped for the conquest of the Mississippi Valley, Bishop Flaget was busy in preparing the way for its coming victories. From the day of his appointment Bishop Du Bourg had conceived the idea of a division of this vast territory into two dioceses, New Orleans and St. Louis. He had spoken to his dearest friend, Flaget, about it, and had even insinuated that Flaget should be appointed to the bishopric of Upper Louisiana, that is St. Louis. At first the Bishop of Bardstown seemed inclined to accept this solution : but later on would no longer hear of the proposition. On June 26th, 1816, Bishop Flaget wrote to Archbishop Neal of Baltimore: "According to your request I candidly pass my opinion about the erection of a new See at St. Louis. I firmly believe that the place is of the utmost importance for the good of religion, not only on account of the many Catholics that live there now, or of those that will immediately emigrate thither, as soon as they hear that there is a Cath- olic Bishop, but much more so on account of the many nations of Indians, that have never heard of the Christian faith. The Bishop that is to be sent thither must be accompanied by a good number of priests and zealous ones, because the country is almost destitute of them. A seminary and college must be erected in order to give to the Catholic religion a superiority over all the other sects that are moving every stone to pull down our faith and build their errors on its ruins. The R. R. Jesuits are certainly those that would suit the best in those quarters, for sixty years ago they carried on almost all the work at the missions both among the French people and the Indians, and their names there are yet in the greatest veneration. If the Holy Father was to send a Jesuit as a Bishop and give five or six companions, I do not entertain the least doubt, but in less than twenty years it would be the most flourishing diocese of all those that are in the United States. But if the Pope sends thither a Bishop by himself or with one or two priests only, nothing good will result from his missions : he will work as a zealous missionary, but he will do nothing as Bishop. As to my translation to that See, if ever it takes place, it will be attended by a great many inconveniences in Kentucky, and Upper Louisi- ana will gain very little by it. Since I am in Kentucky, I have erected a Seminary where there are now seven young men studying divinity, and (251) '2s2 History of the Archdiocest of St. Louis five others more or less advanced in their studies according to the time of their coming; three Monasteries for public schools, in which there are about thirty girls thai have taken their vows, or are ready to take them. Their success in teaching and instructing their pupils of every denomination has far surpassed our expectations. All these establish- ments, if ever I am ordered to go, are threatened with immediate ruin, because all the priests thai attend them will follow me." 1 It was only on the 8th day of August, 1816, that Bishop Flaget's secret misgivings were set at rest by a letter from Bishop Du Bourg that the diocese was not to be dismembered for the present, but the seat of the Bishop of New Orleans would be fixed at St. Louis or possibly. St. Genevieve. The reasons for this decision we have already heard. Bishop Flaget was well pleased and immediately began to prepare the way for Bishop Du Bourg and his band of missionaries. Concerning the work of preparation Bishop Du Bourg had written to Cardinal Dugnani: "However, Your Eminence, before going there, I deemed it necessary to make sure of the kind of welcome 1 might expect there; for I am told also that the coterie at New Orleans have spared no efforts to poison the minds of the country-people, and as much as they could, of the whole Diocese. In consequence, I have written to Bishop Flaget of Kentucky, who is highly esteemed in Upper Louisiana, and who, being 1 well ac- quainted with the dispositions of the people there, solicited the erection of a new Episcopal See in that district; I have requested him to urge those people to express themselves plainly, and assign to the Bishop a maintenance independent from the caprice and humor of his flock. My opinion is, accordingly, that I should wait for their answer before defi- nitely determining to go there. Upon these various points it is extremely urgent, Your Eminence, that I should have, as soon as possible, the directions of the Sacred Congregation; for without these directions I act only at haphazard, being obliged to rely solely on my own judgment. I consulted, however, the most enlightened and wise French prelates and ecclesiastics; and all approved of my plan." 2 In answer to his friend's request Bishop Flaget, through his Vicar- General, Very Reverend Donatien Olivier, sent the following circular letter to all the people of Upper Louisiana: St. Charles, Ky., February 8, 1816. Very Reverend Brother — Without further introduction I notify you t hat probably before the end of this year you will have a resident Bishop, i Archives of Baltimore; printed i" "American Catholic Historical tie searches," vol. XIX, pp. 108-109. -' Archives of Propaganda, Le Codex, 3, pp. 372, 373. Bishop Flaget's Interest in St. Lams 253 cither at Ste. Genevieve or St. Louis, whose diocese, if I be not mis- taken, will comprise the territories of Missouri and Illinois, whilst those of Indiana and Michigan will, for the present, be added to it. This ar- rangement will not be completed, however, until all the inhabitants of these territories unanimously engage themselves to receive with due honor the Bishop and his lawful successors and to place in his hand a fund for the upkeep of a seminary. This notice is official, and I ask you to forward it to all the parishes, those east of the Mississippi as well as those on the western bank. In order to proceed in this matter with all possible prudence, I believe it to be advisable, that every parish hold a parish meeting to select a delegate, and that all the delegates re- pair on a certain day to St. Louis and there deliberate. 1. On the annual income they can promise their Bishop. 2. On the ways and means of securing this income. The mode must be simple and secured against all possible annoyance. 3. On the Bishop's house, its furniture and servants. 4. On a building for the seminary which must be near to the church and the Bishop, or on the lands which may some day furnish, a suffi- cient fund to educate a number of young men destined for the sacred ministry. 5. On the funds necessary to defray the costs which the Bishop may incur in coming to them, and to purchase the necessary pontifical vestments. It would not be out of place to discuss the question where it would he more advantageous to erect the episcopal see. at St. Louis, or Ste. Genevieve. As soon as these discussions are closed and the minutes there- of made up, they shall be submitted to the Bishop of New Orleans and to myself for examination. The remarks which we may feel obliged to make on this we shall send to you, and, as soon as all parties are agreed, the result shall be submitted to the Roman Curia, which is waiting for them in order to make out the Bulls. The great temporal sacrifices which the people must make for the erection of the episcopal see are richly repaid by the permanent spiritual advantages which they will derive therefrom. I am even convinced that within the next few years the popula- tion will be increased by immigration from other states, to such an extent, that in less than ten years your property will have doubled or trebled in value. It would therefore be a lamentable blindness against their own advantage and that of their posterity, if they would. for considerations of present difficulties, reject the favors now offered to them, and thus forever deprive themselves of the hope of possessing an episcopal see. 254 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis As the Location of the sec will mainly depend on the recommenda- tion which, we, Mgr. Du Bourg and myself, will make, I am determined to oppose with ;ill my power, the selection of St. Louis; if it he true, what lias been written to me. that a theatre was opened there, which must neutralize the efforts of even the most zealous and most holy Bishop. Indeed, what would it profit a prelate to inveigh ever so earnestly against the vanities, luxuries and intrigues, when the play-actors may preach in principle and in practice, the intrigues, the luxuries and vanities of the world? That would mean to mingle light with dark- ness, truth with falsehood, Belial with the God of Israel. And to that I could never give my consent. I trust that the citizens of St. Louis will enter into themselves, and will not, for the love of vanity and falsehood, reject the imperishable goods which must of necessity come to them from the presence of a Bishop among them, and from all the institutions which will be established by him. Admonish a'l the people of the various parishes, to bethink themselves, to bewail their sins, to purify their conscience, that they may, by fervent and per- severing prayers, obtain a holy Bishop, who is consumed by the zeal for God's glory and the salvation of souls. Order also, that in all parishes where there is a priest or a pre- centor the Veni Creator, together with the Oratio de Sancto Spiritu. he sung, either before or after Mass; or that, where there is no one to sing, the Rosary be recited. I request that the priests, once a month at least, celebrate the Votive Mass of the Holy Ghost with this inten- tion: for their happiness will greatly depend on the choice the Holy Father the Pope may make. As the parishioners are all well known and dear to me, assure them that I will unite myself with them in their prayers: for no one on earth can more strongly wish for them happiness in time and eternity, In all friendship, I remain, your most devoted servant, Benedict, Bishop of Bardstowai. Vicar-General Donatien Olivier added the following words: My dear Confrere — As I know how devoted you are to the parish entrusted to you, and to the salvation of souls, I need not ask you to carry out all the injunctions entered in this letter of His Grace. Prairie du Rocher, April 9, 1816. Your Confrere, I). Olivier, Missionary in Illinois. Bishop Flaget'sl Interest in St. Louis 255 You will please communicate to me the result of your parish meeting. 3 We have given Bishop Flaget's entire letter as it was read to the Congregation in Missouri. It is, at the same time, a monument of the saintly Bishop's childlike faith and a proof of his enlightened views as to the future glories of the West. The people of St. Louis have certainly never had occasion to regret the sacrifices their fathers were called upon to make for the purpose of a diocese in those ancient days. In the meantime Father De Andreis and his companions had completed all preparations for their journey to St. Louis. Travelling by stage, eight of the company crossed the Allegheny Mountains in the Fall of 1816. Rain was their almost daily compan- ion. The roads became frightfully deep. An occurrence of divine interposition is related by Father De Andreis: "An enormous frag- ment of rock became detached from its place, and rolling rapidly down the mountain side, crossed the road at the very moment that two of our companions were passing. It seemed impossible for them to escape death or, at least, very severe injury: but they were pre- served, the immense mass passing within a hair's breadth of their feet without touching them." 4 But the rain continued to fall in torrents. At a place called Bloody Run, the whole caravan was de- tained for three days: then the stage driver declared he would not go any further, and left the forlorn party at the swollen Juniato River. De Andreis sent a messenger across with the request for another conveyance to bring the party to its destiny. Then another delay occurred. The stage was already crowded. At last Father De Andries procured an ordinary farmer's wagon for their baggage, and, dividing his company into two bands, they all started on foot for the rest of the journey. At last on the 19th day of September, they arrived at Pittsburg, weary and footsore and almost dispirited. Father De Andreis confesses, that in the midst of these frightful mountains, the smiling picture of Rome, its churches and the friends he had left there, presented itself to his mind in glowing colors, and like daggers made him experience, all the tortures of melancholy. It was on the Feast of the Seven Dolors that the missionary ex- pedition reached Pittsburgh. Having found the Church of the place, whose Pastor, Father O'Brien, was absent on one of his missions, all 3 Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. 4 Rosati, "Life of De Andreis," p. 113. 256 History of the Archdiocesi of St. Louis the priests said Mass, ami the others communicated for the first time since the beginning of their journey. On the 23rd of October, 1816 the missionaries started down the Ohio River on a flatboat. On November 19, they reached Lonisville and resolved to await the coming of the Bishop at the Seminary of St. Thomas near Bardstown. Bishop Flaget advised against going to St. Louis at that time. as there were no preparations made for the missionaries, and the missionaries themselves needed further practice in the English and French languages. At Bardstown the good Fathers obtained a fair knowledge of what awaited them beyond the Mississippi. On the 29th of November, 1816 Father I)e Andreis wrote to Father Sicardi in Rome:. "The life of a missionary in this country is pretty hard. He must be constantly on horseback, finding his way here and there through immense woods, to visit the sick and attend the congregations. Sometimes he is obliged to go thirty or forty miles to see a sick person. The congregations are what we call parish- es; the people assemble in cabins built of trunks of trees, laid one upon another, the interstices being filled up with clay, like the greater number of houses, in which the wind and rain enter without difficulty. These are our churches, without pictures and ornaments of any kind, provided merely with a poor wooden altar. They are scattered about among the woods, and on festival days Catholics, and not unfrequent- ly Protestants, too, for ten or fifteen miles around gather together within their walls. All come on horseback, and it is really amusing to behold the surrounding woods filled with horses and to hear them neighing as if a regiment of cavalry were in the vicinity. Confessions take up the greater part of the morning. Mass is said or sung, a sermon or homily preached, and then follow the baptisms, generally very numerous. The sick must be visited, and the poor priest, worn out with fasting, fatigue, the journey and the heat, has at length to beg his dinner here or there. This meal usually consists in some corn- bread, beef-steak and water, without wine, vinegar, soup or oil. Some- times he is obliged to say two Masses, and to preach in places far apart, for the people are very much dispersed, every one being employed in cultivating his own land. There are neither towns nor villages; all the work is done by negro slaves, who are very numerous." 5 And again in his letter to Canon Martorelli, of the Lateran Basil- ica, August 24, 1817: Father De Andreis gives the following descrip- tion of the state of the Church in America: "Picture to yourself an 5 Bosati, "Life of De Andreis," p. 145 and 146. Bishop Fidget's Interest in St. Louis '2~u immense tract of land, entirely covered with woods and forests, dwell- ings scattered here and there without any order, the towns and cities being few in number, which is very inconvenient on account of the small number of priests, and for other reasons of minor importance The churches are situated in open plains, surrounded by the woods. On feast days, men, women and children, of every age and condition. come on horseback, ten, fifteen miles, or even more to attend Mass. hear the word of God, and receive the sacraments; so that, when they wish to go to the Holy Communion, they are compelled, notwithstanding the fatigue of the journey coming and going, to remain fasting until the evening, when they reach their homes. These churches in their outward appearance, resemble all the other houses, being built of rude logs and trunks of trees, which are never scarce in this country. put together with mud, and through which the wind, cold, heat and rain enter by turns. They are entirely devoid of ornament." "Although, with regard to the population, these churches are few in number, still, as priests are likewise very scarce, every one of the latter has to attend to four, five or six of these parishes, or, as they are called here, congregations ; and though a priest is sometimes obliged to say two Masses on one day, some of the congregations are whole months without a clergyman." "On account of the great dis- tance at which the congregations are situated one from another, the missionary is obliged to be constantly on horseback, going here and there to preach, assist the sick, etc. Hence twenty, thirty, sixty or even ninety miles in one day are his customary rides. His life is, indeed, a hard and laborious one. Today he is in one place, but he knows not where he will be tomorrow. He depends entirely for his food and lodging on the hospitality of the planters, who, thank God, are delighted to show every mark of attention to a priest. Even Protestants will do all in their power to receive him well, though the best fare that he can expect consists of nothing but some corn- bread very badly baked, tough salt pork, potatoes and water: This is the refreshment that the missionary finds after a pretty long journey, having heard confessions the whole morning until one or two in the afternoon, said Mass, preached, baptized, etc. ; sometimes at five in the evening he is still fasting." At last in September 1817, came the welcome news that Bishop Du Bourg, accompanied by about thirty priests, had arrived at Balti- more. Bishop Plaget with Fathers De Andreis and Rosati and Broth- er Blanka on October 1st, set out for St. Louis, a journey of about 300 miles, to prepare the people of St. Louis for the Bishop's coming. 6 "Life of De Andreis," p. 162 and 163. Vol. 1—9 258 History of tin Archdiocese of St. Louis Mr. Joseph Tucker served as their guide. The entire journey was made mi horseback. Crossing the Ohio at Shawneetown, they rode through Illinois to Kaskaskia and St. Genevieve, and leaving De Andreis there in place of Father Pratte, they recrossed the river and proceeded by way of Prairie du Rocher to Cahokia, and thence to St. Louis. We will quote from a letter by Father Rosati, as given in the Life of Rev. Father De Andreis, C. M. : "The parish priest of St. Genevieve, the Rev. Henry Pratte, came to meet us with several of the parish- ioners, and as they all knew T.ishop Flaget, who had given a mission in that place, lie was received with many demonstrations of joy. Some of us were quartered in the house of the pastor, others in good Cath- olic families. On the following Sunday Father De Andreis sang High Mass and Bishop Flaget preached. He spoke of the object of our mission, which caused several of the principal inhabitants to assemble on two occasions, when they testified their earnest desire that we should remain among them; but one of their number, a worthy old man, told them plainly that they need not hope for that. St. Louis will have the preference, and we shall be obliged to yield ; such, in fact, was eventually the case. "At length, on the 17th of October 1817, we arrived in the city of St. Louis, which at the period had no pastor; it was attended every three weeks by a priest from the other side of the river, Father Francis Savine. The Bishop and the mis- sionaries went to the presbytery, which was an old stone building almost in ruins, divided by planks into two portions, one of which, the smaller of the two, served as a sleeping room, and the other was appropriated to the parochial and municipal assemblies. In this tot- tering house Bishop Flaget determined to take up his residence, and as there was no bed in it, some of the inhabitants prepared one for him. Father De Andreis and his companions had to sleep on buffalo skins spread on the floor, in the same room or the adjoining. It is true that the citizens were very willing to offer their own houses, but the missionaries concurred with the Bishop in thinking that it was better to he satisfied with a poor but independent abode, rather than accept the offer of any private individual. The parish church, situat- ed very near the presbytery, was in no better condition. It was small, poor and falling into ruins. In a word, wherever the eye turned, nothing could be seen but poverty and desolation." 7 "As soon as Bishop Flaget arrived at St. Louis, he interested himself in the affair entrusted to him by his fellow-laborer. Bishop Du Bourgr." 'Life of De Andreis," p. 168. Bishop Flaget's Interest in St. Louis 259 Having assembled the principal heads of families, he spoke to them of the approaching arrival of their own Bishop and the mis- sionaries he was bringing with him to fix their residence in that place. He proved to them that they should feel very grateful for the choice that had been made of their city; for, in consequence, it would rapid- ly become not only the center of the extensive country around, but the center of all religious and literary instructions, when they and their families would derive immense benefit. He also told them that, since the Bishop's residence among them would confer so many ad- vantages on their city, they ought, on their part, to co-operate in his views, and cheerfully give him all the help they could. He then began to speak of what it was most requisite to do first, and mentioned particularly the preparation of a suitable residence ; and, as all these arrangements could not be considered in the first meeting, he held several general assemblies, at which he begged everyone to express his own opinion. During one of these meetings a certain Mr. L — arose and addressing himself to the Bishop and his fellow-citizens, said : I am far from disapproving the choice that Bishop Du Bourg had made of this city for the place of his ordinary residence. He is a Bishop and is, therefore, at liberty to fix his abode in whatever part of his diocese he may think proper to select; but, inasmuch as it concerns the inhabitants of St. Louis, I see no particular reason why they should contribute to the expense that he will consequently incur. The expense of a diocese should be divided among the whole population ; it is not just that they fall on us alone. We have a parish church ; we will give our pastor a proper salary ; this will be quite enough for our share. If the church is going to ruin, it is our duty to repair it; and though we have no pastor at present, let one be sent to us and we will cheerfully receive him. But as to the Bishop, we are not obliged to do anything, because his permanent residence belongs alike to all." 8 Such were the arguments advanced, but his words made no impression on the assembly, because everyone knew that he was not actuated by genuine zeal for the public good. He was a Catholic only in name, who scarcely ever entered a church, attended instructions, or approached the sacraments ; consequently his words produced no effect on those who heard them. On the contrary, all manifested sentiments of an entirely opposite nature, and willingly offered to contribute, both by labor and money, to whatever the project establishment would require." 9 s Eosati, "Life of De Andreis," pp. 170 and 171. 9 Ibidem, p. 172. "2()0 History of tht Archdiocest of St. Louis One of the citizens, an [rishman by the name of Connor, 1 " con tribute*! the inunitieieiit sum of one thousand dollars, and his example evoked a spirit of generosity such as St. Louis had never before witness <1. Among the Non-Catholies who nobly contributed to the cause was the future Senator Thomas II. Benton, whose son in later years became a convert to the Church. Leaving Father Pratte in charge of St. Louis, and Vicar General De Andreis at St. Genevieve, Bishop Plagel ami Father Rosati started on their return trip to Bardstown, whore they arrived on the (ith of November. Bishop David, the President of St. Thomas Seminary, in formed them of the early arrival of Bishop Du Bourg. i° Jeremiah Connor came to St. Louis in 1805. He was appointed Sheriff of the city in 1800, and served four years, not only as Sheriff but as Collector and Treasurer also. He laid out Washington Avenue, through the center of his property. Besides giving the $1,000 spoken of here, he donated the site on which the Jesuit Church and College Buildings stood in the early days. Who this "Mr. L " was we cannot say. We trust it was not Mr. Patrick Lee, the Warden in charge in 1817. Yet, as trustee for the people, he may have considered it his duty to oppose dangerous innovations. a +^u^cS2^-. (p.J^_a^£_ Chapter 4 BISHOP DU BOURG'S COMING TO ST. LOUIS More than two years had elapsed since Dr. Du Bourg's departure from New Orleans, June 17, 1815; eventful years and full of promise for his vast diocese in the far West. Father Sedella and his adherents were still scheming and threatening : but the opposition had a tendency to move the newly-consecrated prelate to ever new exertions in assembling the means for its final conquest. Heai'tened by his success in gaining the cooperation of the Lazarist Order, not only for the establishment of a Seminary, but also as a permanent establishment in Europe for recruiting priests for the mission. Bishop Du Bour^ sought and obtained in Paris from the saintly Mother Barat, now Saint Madeleine Sophia, the promise of a colony of the Ladies of the Sacred Heart for his diocese of Louisiana. On his visit to Lyons he recommended his poverty- stricken diocese to the charity of the Catholic people of that great city and thus gave occasion to the foundation of the "Society for the Propogation of the Faith," Florence, Bologna; Bordeaux, Paris and a number of other places in France and Belgium were visited by the Bishop, and everywhere a generous response was made to his eloquent appeals. Money, vestments, altar-plate and books were gladly given by princes and nobles, to serve the needs of the American missions. The Holy Father himself, Pius VII, a number of the Cardinals, many bishops and priests made munificent contributions to the great missionary cause. On June 12, 1816, the first company of Bishop Du Bourg's mission- aries, under Father De Andreis, as Vicar General, had been sent on to Louisiana, as the advance guard of the enterprise. Louis XVIII, King of France promised the Bishop free passage for himself and his entire following on the first ship of the royal navy to sail for America. Propaganda had been informed on all these matters: yet the Bishop's delay of going to his diocese seemed unnecessarily protracted. A rather sharp letter urged an early departure. It seemed as if the Bishop had fallen under the suspicion that he entertained greater love for la belle France than for the benighted land of Louisiana. Bishop Du Bourg was deeply hurt by this seeming want of confidence ; but a brief ex- planation cleared up the matter to the perfect satisfaction of all; Bishop Du Bourg's work of preparation was now finished: the actual work of evangelizing the diocese of Louisiana was to begin without delay. On June 16th, 1817, he joyfully announced: "At length the long wished for day is at hand : tomorrow we shall embark, and God willing, set (261) 262 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis sail for America." 3 But another involuntary delay occurred. The good ship, In Caravane, could not Leave its m -ings at Bordeaux before July 1st. The Bishop had with him twenty-nine recruits for the Louisiana .Mission, five priests, four subdeacons, nine clerics, three Christian Brothers, four young men still in their classical course, and four workmen, who had offered themselves to the Mission. The priests were: De Crugui, Anthony Blanc, Auguste Janvier, Charles De la Croix. Secondo Valezano; the subdeacons, Bert rand, Portier, Jeanjean, Valen- tin; the Clerics. Brassac, Des Moulins, Hosten, Niel, De Parcq, Maenhaut, De Neckere. I'errodin, Chauderat ; the Christian Brothers Audio, Fulgen- tius, Antoninus; the College boys. Barreau, De (ieithre, Desprat, Magne. Of the four workmen we have but the Baptismal names, Joseph, Bernard, Isidore, Francis. The voyage lasted sixty-five days, a rather long period of time, but very fruitful in grace to the ship's crew, as w r ell as to the missionary band. Father Anthony Blanc, the future Bishop of New Orleans, tells us about a mission that was given to the officers and sailors on the Caravane. Every day a Catechetical instruction was given to all that wished to come; the Bishop himself made the opening address. On August 24 the Bishop said Mass and gave holy Communion to forty members of the crew, seven of whom were first communicants. Thirty- five of these men received Confirmation on the same day. Some of these men had neglected their duty for thirty years. All the mission- aries had a share in this work, giving instructions and hearing con- fessions. Most touching was the parting scene at Annapolis, when all the sailors fell on their knees and asked a farewell blessing. On the return voyage a hurricane struck La Caravane, in which nearly all members of the crew r were lost. From Baltimore word was sent to Bishop Flaget. Whilst Bishop Du Bourg took up his abode at St. Mary's Semi- nary, (September 10, -November 4) some of his companions, under Father Blanc, were left* at Annapolis, where they were entertained in the man- sion of Charles Carroll of Carrollton. On November 4, the entire party, excepting Mr. Portier, started by stage-coach on their way across the mountains to Pittsburg. The dangers and discomforts of such a journey were graphically described by the Bishop in a letter to his ifriend, Father Brute, dated Pittsburg, November 13, 1817 : My good friend: — What roads! What precipices! What break necks! I do not remember having endured, in my life, such fatigue. After walking half of the second day to avoid dislocating our limbs, on the third we could not escape the overturn of the stage which, that very day, was upset three times. When the first accident took place i Letter to Propaganda, Archives of Propaganda, 1. c, Cod. 3, Fol. 453. Bishop Du Bourg's Coming to St. Loins 263 we were all in the carriage, at the moment of the second, it was empty, and when it was overthrown the third time, all were in except Augustin, Mr. Blanc and myself. We had bravely made up our minds to foot the road. All our fellow-travellers at last took the same resolution. We happily executed our resolution, but not without incredible trouble. This third evening especially we were obliged, for the security of our luggage which had already been upset twice, to follow the stage more than three hours after sunset. Without a ray of light to guide us, we constantly fell into mud and water. When not in sloppy plains, we had to walk over slippery rocks which hurt our feet, while wild briars scratched our faces. I leave you to imagine in what a plight we arrived at our stopping place. We left there at an inn our two sick, Niel and Martin, with Augustin and our baggage. The two invalids availed themselves of a conveyance to come to Pittsburg. Augustin was the day before yesterday, forty miles from here, much embarrassed with the baggage which I expect with great impatience. I fear he cannot find a wagon to bring it to us. Our vanguard party, thanks to God, have been better treated than we were. They had, however, their share of trials, but with all their hardships not a fracture, not even a bruise. I did not feel myself incommoded by reason of my 130 miles walking. I would not, however, advise anyone to travel that road by stage, till the turn-pike, already commenced, is completed, which can- not be before three or four years. On horseback, on foot, these are the best ways unless one has a wagon or carriage of his own. What is most disagreeable about the stage is, that one has to start at 3 A.M., to arrive ordinarily at midnight and sometimes no sooner than 2 A.M., and thus has to ride in the dark over ways which in daytime, it would be rash to cross in stages. We find here in the attentions of Messrs. O'Brien, Ross and Beelen ample compensation for our past troubles We are lodged all together in a vast house which these gentlemen have procured for us. William Valentin is our steward here, he acquits himself of his duties very well indeed. Our servants attend to the cooking. Several of us celebrate Holy Mass in the house, and the others at the Church, which is rather distant. It was only day before yesterday that our rear guard reached here. On Next Sunday I intend to give confirmation and Monday, if Augustin arrives with the baggage, we count on taking the Ohio. I will write you from Bardstow r n. " 2 2 Letter preserved in Bishops' Memorial Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana, printed in "American Catholic Historical Researches," vol. IV, pp. 137 and 138. "The turnpike, already commenced but not yet completed" is the Cumberland Road, winding its way through Maryland, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois towards the Mississippi, was the first National Road to the West. It was completed in 1818. Cf. Archer Butler Hulbert, "Historic Highways of America," vol. X. 2(i4 History of tin Archdioces< oj St. Louis On the eve of December 2, Bishop Du Bourg accompanied by Father Blanc and two Kentucky priests, Chabral and Schaefer, arrived ;ii Bardstown and was enthusiastically received by Bishop Plaget and Father David, and last lmt not least, by the Bishop's own advance guard of missionaries under Rosati, who had anxiously been awaiting his coming since their arrival at St. Thomas a year a. 173 and 174. Bishop Du Bourg's Coming to St. Louis 265 At Fenwiek's Father Badin parted with the company. Only twenty miles away lay the Barrens, where, some twenty years before, a number of his old Kentucky parishioners — as also were the Fenwieks — had come to settle. The occasion to see them was too good to miss: to the Barrens, therefore, he directed his steps, intending to overtake the Episcopal party a few days later at Ste. Genevieve. 4 Returning to the boat, the Bishops "found the comedians performing a play — that is, engaged in a general fight among themselves, — until they were separated by the Captain." At midnight, on the 30th, they arrived in view of Ste. Genevieve, and early next morning they des- patched a messenger to announce their coming to Fr. De Andreis, the pastor for the time being in place of Father Henry Pratte who was in St. Louis to prepare all things necessary for the coming of the Bishop. Two hours later, Father De Andreis, accompanied by some forty of the principal inhabitants, went on horseback to the landing with several young men likewise on horseback, and a carriage, to escort the prelates into the town. They repaired first to the rectory, where they donned their pontifical vestments; and, a few moments later, headed by the cross and twenty-four altar-boys, the two Bishops, under a canopy carried by four of the principal citizens, were, to the accompaniment of the peal of the church-bells and amidst the universal joy of all the parish assembled, and even of the protestant members of the community, conducted in solemn procession, to the throne erected in the sanctuary of the little village church. With that felicitous clever- ness which always put on his lips the right words for the right place, Bishop Du Bourg opened his heart to his St. Genevieve audience, ex- pressing his delight that he was at last in his Diocese, among his own spiritual children, and auguring from this happy event great progress for religion in Upper Louisiana. An enthusiastic Te Deum closed the ceremony, and the rest of the day was spent in receiving visits. On the 1st of January 1818, the Catholics of St. Genevieve witnessed for the first time the splendors of a Pontifical High Mass, celebrated by their Bishop, who once more preached to them ; and the next day, the two Prelates, Father Badin who had joined them after his short visit to the "Barrens" settlement, Father De Andreis and Mr. Niel, crossing over to Illinois, resumed their journey towards St. Louis. They arrived the next evening (Saturday, January 3) at Cahokia, the house of Father Savine, where they were welcomed witli unbounded transports of joy. 5 Monday, January 5th, had been fixed for the last link of the journey. Forty men of Cahokia, mounted on superb chargers, and ■* Spalding, op. eit., p. 171. Spalding, op. eit.. p. 175. 266 History of tin Archdiocese of St. Louis marching two by two in perfecl order, led t lit* pageanl to the lunik of tlic Mississippi River, whore ;i boal was in readiness. On the Missouri side, a large crowd of people, in fact all the inhabitants of the town, Protestants as well as Catholics, were anxiously waiting at the landing. It was a beautiful sight, the city of St. Louis in its early glory, extending along the river two miles iii three parallel streets, each rising above the other. The bank of the river was high and composed of lime- stone. Most of the houses were built of the same material, some of them in "rand style, and surrounded with galleries. Almost every house had an extensive garden or park, enclosed by stone walls. The country around and west of the town was one extended prairie, in which large herds of cattle were grazing. The number of inhabitants was said to be 2,500, all of whom seemed to be lined along the river bank, anxiously awaiting the episcopal convoy. At last the boat landed at the foot of Market Street. The episcopal party was welcomed by the happy multitudes in truly French style and proceeded to the "Episcopal palace," still a sorry looking, tumble-down house, in spite of Father Pratte's best exertions. Soon after, the two Bishops, mitred and clad in their full pontifical robes, came down the steps, were re- ceived under a canopy borne by four prominent men of the church, Didier, Pratte, Sarpy and Belcour and, preceded by twelve altar-boys, marched to the gate; then, turning northwards along the Rue de VEglise — now Second Street — they reached the door of the Cathedral, the rickety log building erected in 1776, and went up to the sanctuary, where a throne had been prepared, whilst the people filled the church to over- flowing. Then Bishop Flaget, leading Bishop Du Bourg to the throne, and installing him in his Episcopal chair, congratulated him on his being in the midst of his beloved children. The sight of the Pastor, now at last at the end of his two thousand league journey, the view of the flock which he had loved so dearly in the days of their spiritual destitution, and the comforting thought they would henceforth never be in want of religious help, so enraptured the zeal-consumed soul of the speaker, the saintly Bishop of Bardstown, that he could not check tears of bliss and hope. For twenty-four years, the Catholics of St. Louis had known him, since the far distant day of his coming to Vincennes, his first mission; and they idolized him; but so delicately did he speak to them of their Bishop, whom it had been his role to herald, that their hearts were completely won to their new pastor. 6 G Spalding's Account of Bishop Du Bourg 's Installation and coming to St. Louis is based on the letter of Father Anthony Blanc, from the Seminary of St. Thomas near Bardstown, Ky., dated January 1818. His source was Bishop Flaget himself and possibly Father Badin. The letter was first published in the Annates df the Association for Propagation of the Faith, vol. II, pp. 330-338. Bishop Du Bourg's Coming to St. Louis 267 That this was no mean victory for the eloquence, and still more for the personality of the Kentucky Prelate, Bishop Du Bourg could judge better than anyone else. He had not been, indeed, entirely with- out misgivings; for he Avas well aware that the pestilential blast poison- ing the Catholic atmosphere in New Orleans, had been wafted as far as St. Louis. But this was now past history. Bishop Du Bourg's own winsome personality completed the victory, so well won by the eloquent Flaget : "the mere presence of the Bishop," says Fr. De Andreis, "his kindness, benignity and, suavity of manner have dispelled the storm, dissipated, in a great measure, every prejudice, and captivated all hearts." 7 Bishop Flaget 's mission was now happily completed. On the Feast of the Epiphany he preached his farewell sermon, and the next day, in company Avith Father Badin, he started back for Bardstown by the AA T ay of Vincennes. Noav, at home, Bishop Du Bourg, Avho henceforth signed himself for several years "Bishop of St. Louis," soon was to prove himself, in Upper Louisiana, the efficient instrument of Him "who commands the light to shine out of darkness." 7 Cf. Letter of Mrs. Anne L. Hunt written to her father, J. B. C. Lucas, at Washington, dated St. Louis, January 4, 1818, with a postscript dated January 5. After describing the event, the postscript concludes: "Bishop Du Bourg is certainly niore eloquent than the other (Flaget). At all events, he speaks more handsomely. All the people appear much pleased with their new acquisition. ' ' Chapter 5 BISHOP DI' BOURG'S DIFFICULTIES Bishop Du Bourg was in almost every regard an ideal Shepherd (if souls, of stately figure and manners, endowed with a voice clear and sweet as a hell, a frank open countenance, not without a touch of languor, as befitting Ids southern birth, at ease among the highest as well as the lowest, yet shrinking from intentional rudeness, because himself so perfect a gentleman, not strong-willed when lie met opposition, but irresistible with those whom lie knew to bear him good will, and above all a priest and bishop with the full realization of his high calling, such was the man who was sent to preside over the rising Church in the Mississippi Valley. Very seldom has a Bishop been placed before such bewildering difficulties at those that revealed themselves to Bishop Du Bourg in his diocese of Louisiana. The vastness of the territory to be evangelized, and the sad condition of the actual and prospective population, are well described by Father Do Andreis in a letter to Father Sicardi in Rome, dated February 24, 1818: "This diocese of Louisiana covers an immense extent of country, and the labor that it will require will soon render it expedient to divide it; cities, towns and villages are "rowing up before our eyes with marvelous rapidity; emigrants are arriving in crowds from all parts of the United States, as well as from Europe. Ireland, Switzerland and France send multitudes of people to the smiling and fertile plains of Missouri, and in a few years the country will become so flourishing, that Europe will no longer excite envy. The chief part of the population is French (Creole as they call it,) and consequently Catholic, but with- out any religious culture, on account of the long period during which the place has been destitute of clergymen and of every means of in- struction. One of the most respectable citizens said to me: 'If Bishop Du Bourg had not come in time to our relief, the last spark of faith would have been ext inguished in our country.' But the French part of the population will soon be absorbed by the American and the English, among whom only a small portion are Catholics, but these are generally very fervent; the greater part are Protestants of various denominations. We have, also both French and English infidels, who call themselves nullifidians, that is to say, without any religion whatever." 1 In addition to his vast field of labor Bishop Du Bourg had also kindly consented to take charge of the ancient missions and parishes along the i Rosati, "Life of Father De Andreis," pp. L78 and L79. (268) BISHOP DU BOURG'S CATHEDRAL Was located on the corner of Second and Market Streets. Built in 1818 and 1819, Blessed, January 9, 1820. The Church was abandoned in the fall of 1834 and burned down April 7, 1835. Bishop Du Bourg's Difficulties 269 eastern borders of the Mississippi, Cahokia, Kaskaskia, Prairie du Rocher, Prairie du Pont and a number of stations of more recent date, in Illi- nois. He also offered to the Bishop of Bardstown the services of four of his priests for the missions of Indiana and Michigan, until the latter could make permanent arrangements for the attendance of these districts. Accordingly on the 25th of April we find Fathers Anthony Blanc and Auguste Jeanjean appointed missionaries for Vincennes, and Fathers Louis Bertrand and Auguste Janvier for Detroit. All these distinguished priests were subsequently withdrawn to Lower Louisiana. The arrangement in regard to the western part of Illinois was made permanent under Bishop Rosati, and subsisted until the erection of the diocese of Chicago. Vincennes remained under Father Blanc's pastor- ship until February, 1820, during which period two chapels were built by him, one in Davis (now Washington) county, Indiana^ the other on the Illinois side of the Wabash River twelve miles from Vincennes. "Most of the French people at Vincennes came from Canada, where religion is much respected," wrote Father Anthony Blanc, the future archbishop of New Orleans. "These poor French people have gained nothing by the change. Deprived of the consolations of religion, living in the midst of savage natives, they have received nothing in return. Although their language is not a dialect, they have mingled with it so many expressions, strange even to our old French, that one must speak very slowly and very simply to be understood. I found this not a little difficult, but I am becoming accustomed to it." 2 Even the elements seemed to be leagued against the messengers of the Gospel. Father De Andreis complains to Father Sicardi, February 24, 1818 : "The country lying between here and the Pacific is inhabited only by wild beasts, and savages, whose state is not unlike theirs. Though the climate ought to be rather warm, our latitude being only the 39 degree, the cold is so intense, that I never experienced anything like it. We cannot remain very far from the fire, though we often put one coat over another; the cold is so piercing, that it seems to reach the brain, and almost makes one giddy. I have very frequently found nothing but ice in the chalice whilst at the altar, and had some difficidty in melting it by means of fire, which had to be brought to the spot ; and even then in consuming the sacred species, I was compelled to make use of my teeth. This extreme cold proceeds from the north winds, which, descending from the icebergs of Greenland, and passing over the frozen lakes of Canada, come here to freeze us to death. We can say, with 2 "Annnles do In Propagation de la Foi, " vol. II, p. 343. Englished 1>.\ Naina dos Santos in ''Records of American Catholic Historical Society," vol. XIV, pp. 2D7 and 208. 270 History of tin Archdiocest of St. Louis St. Paul, 'Blessed be God in frigore,' though not 'in nuditate,' for we are bul too well provided for.'.' 3 Bishop Dii Bourg deeply sympathized with his friends whom be had drawn away from cultured surroundings to this inhospitable wilder- aess. But his imagination painted the future in glowing colors, and his unshaken trust in God and in his friends abroad, supported him and his followers in all hardships and privations. What troubled him most was the pressing need of money. Finding his means unequal to the establishment of the many build- ings needed in his see for religion, divine worship and education, wrote as follows to one of his open-handed friends in Europe: "Say to those who seem fearful of injury to the interests of Prance by working for distant lauds, that the good which they will do here will return to them a hundred-fold. Try to imagine how I must feel, realizing that I am surrounded by an expanse of live or six hundred leagues, upon which is scattered a multitude of neglected Catholics, and Protestants, who are such only by the misfortune of their birth, and who are dis- poned to listen to the truth when it is preached to them. Turn then your eyes on hundreds of Indian tribes that seem but to wait for in- struction in order to embrace the faith. How touched you would be if you could see the frequent deputations which I receive from them, the religious respect which they testify to me, and the urgent prayers which they address to me, to be their father, to visit them and to give them men of God. In the midst of the great sadness which the view of so many of my neglected children causes me, I am beginning to iexperience the consolation of seeing the seed of the word bear fruit. In the established parishes everywhere they are beginning to approach the sacraments frequently, and in a most edifying manner. A single mission- ary wrote to me lately that he had had, this year, sixteen hundred Easter Communions and two hundred First Communions. The schism is ex- tinct. Old enemies have returned to obedience and union." 4 Among the great number of difficult problems that presented them- selves to the newly arrived Bishop for immediate solution was first and foremost, the erection of a Cathedral. The old Church, indeed, resembled the first Christian temple, the stable of Bethlehem: but surely, the people of St. Louis would be willing to prepare a more fitting abode for their dear Lord. Bishop Du Bourg was full of gratitude and hope; his vivid imagination, as always, hid away the difficulties of the under- taking in the splendor of the prospective accomplishment. Cnder date of January 8th, 1818, that is the second day after his arrival in St. Louis, lie writes; 3 "Life of De Andrew," pp. L76 and 177. t Annates, vol. I. pp. 20-21, Records, vol. XTV. p. 141. Bishop Du Bourg's Difficulties 271 "Here I am in St. Louis, and it is no dream. The dream would be most delightful, but the reality is even more so. I visited several parishes, en route. Everywhere the people came in crowds to meet us, showing me the most sincere affection and respect. My house is not magnificent; but it will be comfortable, when they have made some necessary repairs. I will have a parlor, a sleeping room, a very nice study, beside a dining room, and four rooms for the ecclesiastics, and an immense garden. My cathedral, which looks like a poor stable, is falling in ruins, so that a new church is an absolute necessity. It will be one hundred and fifty feet long by seventy wide ; but its construction will take time, especially in a country where everything is just begin- ning. The country, the most beautiful in the world, is healthy and fertile, and emigrants pour in. But everything is very dear." 5 It is very difficult, as every priest knows, to start the building of a church immediately after one's arrival in a parish. But Bishop Du Bourg had a number of points in his favor which the ordinary priest usually has not. Chief among them was the absolute necessity of the case. This circumstance, together with the Bishop's imposing presence and eloquent appeal quickly brought the proper decision, so that Father De Andreis, who now had taken up his abode in St. Louis, could write on February 24th, 1818: "The plan of a cathedral to be built of stone, is already traced, and will soon be carried into execution. When this is done, we will begin to think of the other buildings; it is but just that we should commence by the church, for we have nothing now to serve the purpose of one, but a miserable log-cabin, open to every wind, and falling to pieces. The bishop has, however, bestowed upon it a splendid temporary decoration, chiefly composed of the orna- ments he obtained while in Europe." 6 Bishop Du Bourg having decided to make the city of St. Louis his episcopal residence, at least for a time, determined to build a cathedral- church worthy of the diocese he represented. The following notice appeared in the Missouri Gazette, March 26, 1818 : "Next Sunday, 29th inst., at 4 p.m., will be laid by the Rt. Rev. Bishop Du Bourg, with the solemn rites used in the Catholic Church on similar occasions, the first stone of the new Cathedral. The intended grandeur of that fabric, together with the sanctity of the object to which it is destined, cannot fail exciting a lively interest in the breasts of all those who have at heart the growth and embellishment of this infant city, but above all, its moral and religious improvement. The stone is to be hollowed in the form of a chest, to contain and preserve to the latest generations the names of benefactors, coins of various descriptions and some memoirs of the present times." s Annales, vol. II, p. 338 s. Eecords, vol. XIV, pp. 142 and 143. « "Life of De Andreis," pp. 182 and 183. 272 History oj tin Archdiocesi of St. Lotus Another secrel of this rapid settlemenl of the matter may be found hi the aegotiations of the Bishop of Bardstown, in the preceding fall, which culminated in starting a subscription; so thai when a meeting of the parish was held on the day after the installation, sonic definite ideas could be discussed ; the size and materials of the church were then settled. "When the firsl subscription was opened, $6,566 was subscribed, out of which $4,271.75 was actually collected- $3,099.75 by Thomas McGuire and $1,172 by Jeremiah Connor. It is often repeated thai nothing is more dry and uninteresting than an account book. This may he true, if one does not go beyond names and figures; but how false it is when you can read between the lines! 1 give here a i\>\x names, which have become household words among US: Auguste Chouteau $400, Pierre Chouteau $200, A. P. Chouteau $50, Thomas Brady $200, Jeremiah Connor $200, Bernard Pratte $300, John B. Sarpy $20, Alexander McNair $100, B. Berthold $100, John Mullanphy $100, Theodore Papin $20, Theodore Hunt $100, Frederick Hates $100. Thomas II. Benton $100, ( added $50 later), M. Sanguinet $50, Henry Von Phul $50 (paid $30), Francis Robidoux $60 (paid $30), Wm. Carr $100 (paid $50), P. B. and J. P. B. Gratiot $30 (paid $50), Anthony Soulard $50, J. P. Cabanne $20, Wm. Clark $100 (paid $75), .Manuel Lisa $150. I notice that by far, most of the three figure subscriptions were faithfully paid; the difference between the amount subscribed and that collected comes mostly from the failure of the small subscribers to keep their pledged word. A second subscription launched some months later exclusively, it appears, or very nearly so, among the Catholics, netted $1,303.36, mostly collected by Mr. P. Leduc. The new church was located on the northeast corner of the church- yard, that is, on the corner of Second and Market, with the entrance on Second. Ground was broken early in 1818, and foundations started at once, so that the corner stone could be laid on Quasimodo Sunday, March 29, 1818; and in June the construction had risen to 15 feet above ground (Letter of Rosati to his brother, summer 1818). Still it was only on Christmas day of the next year that services were held in it for the first time. The blessing took place on January !), 1820. And high time it was, for the old log-church, which had to be used meanwhile, could hold out no longer. Among the notable events which were enacted in its walls during the last years of its existence, must be mentioned the solemn Te Deum and Thanksgiving service held by Father Savine after the victory of New Orleans, and leaving aside the Bishop's reception, the various ordinations performed by Bishop Du Bourg during his stay in St. Louis. There did Father Xiel receive minor Orders, sub-deacon- ship, deaconship and, on March 19, 1818, Holy priesthood : there Mr. Bishop Du Bourg's Difficulties 273 Portier, the future Bishop of Mobile, was elevated to the priesthood; on Michaelmas day of the same year, 1818; Mr. Tichitoli, on December 15, 1818; Mr. Dahmen, the future pastor of St. Genevieve for many years, on September 5, 1819; there, finally, were held, on December 5, 1818, the funeral services over the body of the lamented Father Carretti, the first of Bishop Du Bourg's recruits, who died in Upper Louisiana. The new church was not completed when it began to be in use ; indeed, it was never finished. Only the middle nave, consisting of a rather awkwardly narrow rectangle measuring 135 by 40 feet, had been erected ; the five large arches on either side, originally intended to separate the middle from the side aisles, were filled in with masonry and served as outer walls. But if, from the architectural standpoint the church in its incompleteness gave the idea of a narrow shouldered and narrow chested consumptive body, its beauty within amply com- pensated the mean outward appearance. "The cathedral of St. Louis," says the first St. Louis directory, issued in 1821, "can boast of having no rival in the United States for the magnificence, the value and elegance of her sacred vases, ornaments and paintings, and indeed few churches in Europe possess anything superior to it. It is a truly delightful sight to an American of taste to find in one of the remotest towns of the Union a church decorated with the original paintings of Rubens, Raphael, Guido, Paul Veronese, and a number of others by the first modern masters of the Italian, French and Flemish schools. The ancient and precious gold embroideries which the St. Louis cathedral possesses would certainly decorate any museum in the world. All this is due to the liberality of the Catholics of Europe who presented these rich articles to Bishop Du Bourg on his last visit through France, Italy, Sicily and the Netherlands. Among the liberal benefactors could be named many princes and princesses, but we will only insert the names of Louis XVII, the present king of France, and that of Baroness La Candele de Ghyseghem, a Flemish lady, to whose munificence the cathedral is particularly indebted. We know that Bishop Du Bourg had come back from Europe with many beautiful and precious things, and have no doubt that, thanks to these, the cathedral must have excited wonderment. But as to there being among these treasures original Rubens, Raphael, Guido Reni and Veronese paintings, we have very serious doubts." 7 At a meeting of the parishioners held on the 30th of January, 1820, the Marguilliers were authorized to sell the materials of the old church, the proceeds going to the building fund of the new edifice. From an i From the beautiful article of the Rev. Dr. Charles Souvay, G. M., "Around the St. Louis Cathedral with Bishop Du Bourg," 1818-1820, read before the "Cath- olic Historical Society" of St. Louis, Nov. 21, 1917, and subsequently published in the "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review." vol. V, pp. 149-159. 274 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis entry in the parish account book, page 21, we learn that the sale brought just $110. Another meeting, convened on .March 7, elected six persons "to act jointly with the building committee for the disposal of the pews; they were John 1>. C. Lucas, Antoine D'Enjen — who resigned and was replaced by Francis Guyol — Francois Xavier Valois, Pierre Didier, Antoine Chenie and Hugh O'Neil; and it was enacted that these sis men, together with the building committee, should "take such measure as in their opinion they would think fit for the disposal of the pews of the old church which the aforesaid meeting abandon this day," and "find the most advantageous means of selling the pews of the new church, in order to defray the expenses already incurred in the construction of said church." The account book shows that 9-") pews were sold for $9,295, out of which $6,786.38 are entered as paid. But all this, the two subscriptions and the sale of the pews, totaling 12,000 odd dollars, was far from covering the cost of the cathedral — more than $20,000; nor was the building of this edifice the only undertaking of Bishop Du Bourg : he had started in the summer of 1818 the Seminary at the Barrens; after the wrecking of the old church, he built on the spol the college which had been commenced on November 2, 1819, with Father De Andreis at its head. 8 The debt still resting on the Cathedral was $4,500 for which sum Auguste and Pierre Chouteau, and Bernard Pratte, as members of the building-committee had made themselves personally responsible. This sum did not appear exorbitant at the time building operations were begun Yet, as Billon informs us, "By the time the building was covered in, late in 1819, a revulsion in business had occurred, money had become scarce, the fifty independent banks of Kentucky and other kindred institu- tions in the West, Ohio, Indiana, Tennessee, etc., that had furnished nearly all of our circulating medium, to use an expression of the day, had all "busted up." The building was never finished interiorly, and our commissioners, who had made themselves personally liable, were com- pelled to apply to the state authorities for relief or pay the bills out of their own pockets. Accordingly upon the application of the three above-named gentle- men, "An Act of the Legislature, for the relief of Auguste Chouteau and others, commissioners of the Roman Catholic Church, approved December 17th, 1822, authorized them to sell at public sale, by the Sheriff, so much of the Church Block in St. Louis as was not used for Church and Ceme- tery purposes, as would be necessary to indemnify them for the amount they had advanced and had become responsible for in the erection of the brick church to the extent of $4,500." 1 [bidem, p. 157. Bishop Du Bourg's Difficulties 275 Accordingly, at the request in writing of the said commissioners, Auguste Chouteau, Pierre Chouteau and Bernard Pratte, Sheriff John K. "Walker, sold at public sale, September 16, 1823, the south part of the block, being the Walnut street front, as per plat of division, made by the parties interested. Lot No. 1, 37 by 131 feet, with barn, stable, etc., for $ 301 Lot No. 2, 75 by 131 feet, with the orchard 201 Lot No. 3, 70 by 150 feet, with the Presbytere, kitchen and new house 501 Lot No. 4, 48 by 180 feet, with the College 201 Total $1,204 Father Niel, the President of the College, was the purchaser j and on May 25, 1824, conveyed to the three above-named parties the same, except the College building, which he reserved with three feet of ground around the same. Bernard Pratte, Auguste Chouteau and Pierre Chouteau reconveyed to Bishop Joseph Rosati, July 1, 1828, for $4,748.28, with 6 per cent interest, the foregoing church property. The old brick church continued to be occupied as such, until the completion of the new stone structure on the Walnut street front of the block, which was opened for divine service in October, 1834. When the old one was abandoned to the lessees of the ground on which it stood it was used as a warehouse for the next six months until it was destroyed by fire, on the night of April 6, 1835. " 9 The erection of the St. Louis College on the site of the old Spanish church, was almost coincident with the building of the Cathedral. The moving spirit in this undertaking was the young curate of the Cathedral, Francis Niel. The beginnings were rather humble, to be extended at a future period, as might be found expedient or necessary. "With that view", as the Annalist of St. Louis tells us, and to aid the undertaking, the following document was drawn up, and received the approval and signature of all the Catholic householders of St. Louis, including a few, who not themselves "Catholics," were allied to Catholic families. "We, the undersigned, inhabitants and property holders of the town and parish of St. Louis, Territory of Missouri, members of the Roman Catholic religion, being informed that the Reverend Francis Niel, Vicar of this parish, by the authority of the Right Rev. Bishop Guillaume Du Billon, "Annals of St. Louis in Territorial Days,'' pp. 418-420. 276 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis Bourg, has undertaken to erect at his own cost, on ;i lot forming a part of tin' yanl of the Presbytere, a house to he used for Lodging the Clergy of our Church, and the keeping of a school for the education of youth; considering the various useful purposes of this enterprise, and desiring to protect it from all claims or molestation on the part of persons badly informed, or badly disposed, as far as necessary, we hereby express our entire approbation of the building of such a house, and inasmuch as in our said capacities we might have a right to dispose of the lot forming part of the Presbytere, we warrant the free use thereof for the purpose hereinabove mentioned to the clergy of our communion by the authority of our bishop. Made and executed at St. Louis. Territory of Missouri, the 30th Octo- ber, 1819." Bishop Du Bourg 's College, built on the site of the old Catholic log church, on Second, below Market, in 1820: had the following faculty: Rev. Francis Niel, curate of the Cathedral, president ; Rev. Leo. Deys, professor of languages; Rev. Andreas Ferrari, professor of ancient lan- guages; Rev. Aristide Anduze, professor of mathematics; Rev. Edmond Saulnier, professor of languages; Mr. Samuel Smith, professor of lan- guages; Mr. Patrick Sullivan, professor of ancient languages; Mr. Francis C. Guyol, professor of writing and drawing; Mr. John Martin, prefect of the studies. 10 The College was a two-story building of brick and had about sixty to seventy students. Among the pupils we find such names as Wilson Primm, Rene Paul, French Strother, Jesse Benton, James O 'Toole, Lewis M. Clark and the four sons of Governor McXair, with a number of others who later on attained distinction, as Judges, soldiers, statesmen, and merchants. Elihu H. Shepard, 11 who taught languages at the College from 1823 to 1826, in his Autobiography, gives a few pleasant glimpses of Father Saulnier and the other Professors of the first College estab- lished in St. Louis. In connection with the College we may mention Bishop Du Bourg 's very elegant and valuable library, containing about 8,000 volumes, and which was, "in the language of one of the Bishop's visitors, the most com- plete scientific and literary repertory of the western country, if not of the western world. Though it is not public, there is no doubt but the man of science, the antiquary and the linguist, will obtain a ready access to it, and find the Bishop a man endowed at once with the elegance and politeness of the courtier, the piety and zeal of the apostle, and the learn- ing of a Father of the Church." 12 io Billon, op. eit., pp. 4"Jn s. n Shepard, Elihu II., "Autobiography," ji]). 98-103. 12 Edwards, "The Great West," pp. :!L':', and 324. Bishop Du Bourg's Difficulties 277 The lots on .which the church, college and other buildings were erected embrace the entire square between Second and Third, and Market and Walnut street, a part of which was still used as a burial ground. On May 11, 1826 Bishop Du Bourg advised Jtosati to close the ' school because there were no priests available as professors. This was done on the Bishop's last visit to St. Louis. Chapter 6 FATHER XI EL AND THE CHURCH-WARDENS Bishop l)u Bourg's project of making their little town of two thousand inhabitants, on the frontiers of civilization, an episcopal city with a costly Cathedral and expensive Cathedral clergy, must have seemed visionary to the people of St. Louis, however, strongly it may have appealed to their local pride. The real sentiments of the ureal majority were reflected in I he curt saying i I' one of their members to Bishop Flaget : "We have a parish Church; we will give our pastor a proper salary; this will he (pule enough for our share, lint as to the Bishop, we are not obliged to do anything, because his permanent residence belongs alike to all." Nevertheless the pro-cathedral was built, and partly paid: the parish residence was fitted up for the Cathedral clergy. Father Francis Xiel who had been raised lo the holy priesthood on March 19th, 1818, was appointed assistant to Father De Andreis, the pastor of the Cathedral, and soon followed him as pastor in his own right. It is of Father Niel's dealings with the Church wardens and parish meetings this chapter would give a few particulars. 1 At the General Meeting of the Parishioners held on March 7th, 1820, Charles Besseron was elected President and Mary Philip Leduc, Sec- retary of the Building Committee. The wardens for 1821 were Hubert Guion, and Louis Brazeau. On .January 21st, of that year the question of the pastor's salary came up. " It was resolved that there should be an allowance to the Cure of the city of a sum of seven hundred piasters annually, which sum shall be taken from the funds of the Church and regulated by the warden. It is understood, however, that this payment must not affect the payment of the debts which the Building Committee has contracted for the Construction of the church." January 13th, 1822, Joseph Boju was elected warden in place of Hubert Guion, and the following year 1823, there were four wardens: Joseph Boju, Thomas McGuire, J. B. Duchouquette and Michael Murphy: The purpose of this appears from the following resolution: "The wardens shall be obliged to collect the debts due for the pews as well as the rent, which they shall remit to Rev. Francois Xiel to pay the expenses of the Church. But, in the meeting held on April 1st, 1824, i The subject mutter of this chapter was derived mainly from the original " Hegistrum Ecelesiae St. Ludovici. ' ' the Ms. of which is preserved in the Archives of the Archdiocese of St. Louis. (278) Father Niel and the Church-Wardens 279 the wardens were authorized to continue to pay with the income of the church the debt of the church contracted by the Committee." 2 The question of Father Kiel's salary still unsettled, there arose another question of serious import to the Wardens of the Church of St. Louis. In February 1823, the trustees of the town of St. Louis passed an ordinance prohibiting the burial of dead within its limits. The boundary line of the city ran- along Seventh Street : The old Ceme- tery on Market Street between Second and Third must, therefore, be abandoned and a new burying ground must be acquired. When Laclede - Liguest laid out the village of Pain-Court, soon to be known as St. Louis, he assigned an entire block for the use of the Church. Here the successive churches were erected, here the ministers of God had their home, and here in the church-yard were laid the sacred remains of the dead as seed-grains of the harvest of eternity. The first burying ground in St. Louis was, therefore, a church-yard in the primitive sense of the term. It was in use since 1770. In the first two years forty-four persons were buried in its blessed soil. St. Ange de Bellerive found his last resting place here on December 27th, 1774. From 1776 to 1789 the total number of interments were three hundred and thirty-four, sixty of negroes, and fifty-four of Indian converts. Governor De Leyba received the honor of being buried in the church itself. A list of prominent people laid to rest in the Old Cemetery was published in the Missouri Republican Weekly of September 29th, 1837. The old was giving way to the new : as the old church had passed away so the old grave yard, also, was doomed. On March 17th, 1823, a parish meeting was held for the purpose of meeting the emergency. Father Kiel is now in the President's chair, and Gabriel Paul holds the position of Secretary. The President announced, that the Cemetery must be closed before the first day of April next year, 1824, and that it was an urgent matter for the parish to procure a suitable plot of ground for a new cemetery. A committee of four was appointed to investigate, whether the parishioners wish to locate their new Cemetery on the common of the city of St. Louis, or to select another location, as convenient as possible. In the meantime the wardens circulated subscription lists among the parishioners to raise the salary of Father Kiel by voluntary offer- ings. 2 Father Niel, as a student, had come to St. Louis with Bishop Flaget and Father Badin, was ordained by Bishop Du Bourg in St. Louis Cathedral, March 19, 1818, became its pastor and at the same time President of the St. Louis College, was sent to Europe in March 1825, for the purpose of collecting funds for the mission, and never returned. He was an eloquent preacher and published in French a book of devotion. "La Voie Du Ralut," Par M. Abbe F. Niel, Paris 1845. 280 History of tht Archdioces( of St. Louis On April L3th, 1823, the Committee appointed to make inquiries for a plot of ground for cemetery-purposes made its report to the parish assembled under the presidency of Father Niel; and it was resolved <>n motion of Rene Paul, thai the wardens be authorized to accept tlic offer of Mr r Stokes, 8 who proposed to transfer the title to four acres of land on the St. Charles Road, a little more than a mile from the city-limits, withoul asking any consideration except the assignment of a pew in the Church. The wardens were requested at the same time to report on the advisability of a wood, stone or brick enclosure for the proposed cemetery and to make a complete list of the Members of the Congregation in alphabetical order. The question as to Father Niel's salary was referred to the next meeting. On September 31st, 18215, a meeting of the wardens was held in the parsonage in which it was unanimously resolved, that there would be reserved all around the new cemetery a border of land, about twenty- one feet in depth, to he distributed in lots for those who might desire a burying ground for their families. The price was set at two piasters a foot of front. Father Niel had added the remark: "Only Catholics were entitled to this privilege," but it was crossed out with heavy strokes of the pen: hence non-catholics were also to be permitted to purchase such lots on the borders of the Catholic Cemetery, The entry is signed by Father Niel and Joseph Boju, C. W. and Thos. McGuire, 2nd C. W. ( hi June 28th, 1824 the trustees of the Catholic Church gave notice of the opening of their new Cemetery about one mile from the limits of the city, or rather, of the border around the Catholic Cemetery open to non-Catholics as well as Catholics. The announcement read as follows. "The inhabitants of St. Louis and its vicinity are made acquainted that a public graveyard, under the superintendence of the wardens of the Catholic congregation, and adjoining their burial- ground, is now open, and that burials may hereafter take place by conforming with the following resolutions passed by the committee: Applications for burial to be made to the warden in office for the year. The price of burial to be ten dollars, five dollars for children under ten years of age. Persons who would fence in a particular spot for their family, each burial, to be twenty dollars, and ten dollars for children under ten years of age. The amount of burial to be settled with the church warden before the burials take place. No grave to be 3 William Stokes was a member of the Episcopal Church, His career was a really romantic one full of the ups and downs of fortune. John P. Darby in his "Personal Recollections'' devotes Cull twenty pa^es to "Poor Old Stokes," pp. Uti 146. Col. John O'Fallon married a sister of Stokes. It is to Mr. William Stokes the Church of St. Louis owes its second burying-ground. Father Niel and the Church-Wardens 28] dug bu1 by the digger appointed for that purpose, and according to the regulations for said graveyard. The warden in office for this year is Mr. J. B. Belcour." 4 The question of Father Niel's salary came up at last in the parish meeting of February 15th, 1824. In a meeting of the members of the Catholic congregation held this day in church where there were present a majority of parishioners, the wardens made the following report : "We, the Wardens of the parish of St. Louis, being assembled to take into consideration the situation of affairs of the congregation in general, have first proceeded to the inventory of all the articles of the church committed to our care. Having taken into consideration the letter which the Reverend Father Niel addressed to the wardens and on which nothing has been stated in the last meetings held for that purpose ; being unanimously convinced that it is the duty of every member of the congregation to contribute alike to the support of his Pastor in order to have an equal right to the practice of his religion, and to the spiritual assistance of our holy religion, we have agreed that 1. The annual contribution for the subsistence and maintenance of the Cure of this Parish cannot be less than two piasters for each head of a house and the Catholic proprietors of pews in the church, and of one piaster for the bachelors and young grown people. 2. The payments to begin in the present year will be made known semi-annually the first of March and of September of each year. 3. Every contributor who will refuse to pay (unless his inability to pay is known) will forfeit by this act the rights and privileges attached to the congregation and his name will be taken from the list of the members who compose it. 4. That all the funeral and marriage expenses will always be de- mandable in advance. The said four articles read above and intelligible in French and in English have been unanimously approved." Then the question of the Cemetery was taken up by the assembly and the resolutions resolved : "We being also assured that the Bishop of Louisiana has found it advisable and permitted a part of the Catholic cemeteries to be used for funerals other than those of the members of the congregation, have agreed upon the following: * Scharf, "History of St. Louis," pp. 1750 and 1751. 282 History of tht Archdiocese of St. Louis 1. The presenl Cemetery will be enclosed ;is much as possible in its entirety, and it will include a section of One hundred i'eet Square, to receive there the bodies of persons who do not belong. to our congregation, and whose relatives or friends, will request their burial there. 2. The remuneration to be paid for such interments cannot be less than twenty gourdes. 3. Every member of the congregation wdio will have bought and paid for a family lot as that furnished by the agreement of the third of last September can bury there those of his family who do not belong to our Catholic Congregation by paying to the church the final remunera- tion by the tariff for interment of the first class. The said three articles read in French and in English have been unanimously approved. Resolved further that the list of persons who form the Catholic congregation of the parish of St. Louis will be placed on a special record in alphabetical order with the account of each, open for the payment of the contributions." 5 They were great in making resolutions, these early fathers of our diocese : but it required more than resolutions to get on the highway of success. On Sunday, March 28th, 18124, the warden in charge announced to the assembly a letter of Father Niel's offering to re-assign the land of the church wdiich he bought. This refers to the public sale by the Sheriff of so much of the Church Block in St. Louis as was not used for Church and Cemetery purposes, to reimburse the Building- Commissioners, Auguste and Pierre Chouteau, Bernard Pratte and others, for the money advanced by them on the construction of the pro-cathedral. Father Niel, probably at the request of Bishop Uu Bourg, had bought the lots for one thousand two hundred and four dollars. He was now offering to turn them over to the gentlemen of the committee as part- payment of the church debt. Only the lot on which the College stood was retained by its President, Father Niel. Yet, the matter of these church lots was a thorn in the flesh of both Bishops Du Bourg and Rosati, for a long time after. Father Niel now insisted on the payment of a salary of five hundred dollars and four church collections a year. The petition was granted, but the raising of the amount was left to the good will or sense of justice of the parishioners. Gabriel Paul served as warden in charge during 1825, and Passon Ifonore was elected for 1826, but resigned in June 1827, when Louis Auguste Iienoist was nominated with Manuel Alvarez as his assistant. 5 Register, passim. Father Niel and the Church -Wardens 283 In 1828 Market Street was widened. In consequence a part of the old Cemetery was condemned, and all those who had relations in the part which was given up were ordered to leave notice with the Sexton of the Church (the Cathedral) who would remove them without charge. This order is signed by Wm. Carr Lane and R. Paul, Board of Commissioners. In the meeting of January 3rd, 1830, M. Rodiez was elected Warden for the year. This is the last entry in the Register. It is written in English, and signed by Father Edmund Saulnier, Father Xiel's successor at the Cathedral, Bernard Pratte, M. P. Leduc, Th. Robidoux, E. De Hodiamont and Manuel Alvarez. A number of leaves have been cut out of the book ; whether they contained any writing cannot be discovered. A new project was being slowly realized, the erection of the new stone Cathedral, of Bishop Rosati, in our days designated as the Old Cathedral. In order to obtain means to carrv out this for the times magnificent plan, the landed holdings of the Church in St. Louis were reduced to a minimum, just as the place appears today. The last vestiges of the old Cemetery had to disappear. But, whenever a Catholic Cemetery has to be closed, and the land devoted to building purposes, the Church with tender care takes up the remains of her departed and deposits them in consecrated ground. This act of piety was extended in 1831, to practically all the dead resting in the old Cemetery on Market Street. The circumstances of the event are given by Judge Primm in one of his Sketches of Early St. Louis Catholicity. "At a meeting of the parishioners on April 4th, 1830, under 1lie presidency of Bishop Rosati, M. Philip Leduc acting as secretary, it was resolved to build a new Cathedral and, in order to raise funds for the undertaking, to lease for 99 years the north half of the Church block where is the ancient Cemetery and the pld Church stands." A committee was appointed to carry out these resolutions. A loan of eight thousand dollars was offered by Bishop Du Bourg, and gratefully accepted, and the north half of block 59 Avas leased to George Morton and Joseph C. Lavelle. This lease was executed on August 25th, 1830.° The contract for digging up the graveyard was given to Benjamin Walker. On March 18th, 1831 the president of the Committee announced, that the digging of the graveyard had been completed 6 From Wilson Primm 's "Retrospective View of the First Religious Establish- ment in the City of St. Louis," read before the Missouri Historical Society, Septem- ber 16, 1875, and printed in "Church Progress." 284 History of tin Archdiocest of St. Louis according to contract, measured by R. Paul and round to be 46,020 yds : the vault 14 yds., which at 10% cts. per yard amounted to $499. 49. He stated moreover, that lie had paid Benjamin Walker the whole amount." 7 The remains dug up by Benjamin Walker in 1831, it would seem, were deposited in a vault in what was afterwards called "The Bishop's Graveyard" on Jefferson Avenue. " Prinim, 1. e. yiiiY n£\y* fixvivi+v\ijji£. First Superior of the Congregation of the Mission in the United States and Vicar General of Upper Louisiana. Chapter 7 FATHER FELIX DE ANDREIS Of all the members of that bright galaxy of missionaries that con- tributed to the wonderful success of Bishop Du Bourg in evangelizing the diocese of Louisiana, the first one to join was also the foremost one in regard to the gifts of nature and of grace, the gentle son of St. Vincent de Paul, the saintly Father Felix de Andreis. A clear and deep thinker, well fitted to unravel the most knotty questions of divinity and natural science, he was also gifted with a tenacious memory, that treasured up for immediate use whatever he read or heard, and with a heart full of the wisdom that the love of God alone can inspire, he was an ideal Super- ior; his counsel and advice never failed. But this was not all. Felix de Andreis was a mystic of the school of St. Bernard, St. Theresa and St. John of the Cross, striving after that intimate union with God, which those great mystics enjoyed, and breathing forth, now in prose, now in verse, the delights of the visions God granted to him. amid the poverty, the privations and the sufferings of his laborious life. Only forty-two years of earthly existence were granted to him, but in this short space of time he accomplished many great things. He was a learned theologian, a profound philosopher, and one of the most eloquent preachers of his time. Latin he spoke fluently and with elegance. He was well versed in Greek and Hebrew. Even the natural sciences were of deep interest to his inquiring mind. If he had devoted himself to a literary calling, he would have attained distinguished success, as the elegance of his occasional writings testify. Poetry was his great delight. A volume of sacred songs written by him in moments of mystical abstrac- tions was found among his numerous manuscripts, but subsequently perished. Yet, though highly gifted for a contemplative life, Father de Andreis was called to an active life in the Congregation of the Mission. In the diocese of Louisiana he was to fill the office of Superior of his Congregation and the still more arduous office or Vicar-General for Upper Louisiana, at the same time holding the position of Parish priest of St. Louis and Director of the Seminary of the Diocese and the Novitiate of his Order. Work enough for three or four strong men; And yet, Father de Andreis was never strong physically, least of all after the horrors of the journey from Baltimore to St. Louis. But he did all this work with remarkably rich results. Quiet and unobtrusive in his manner, he went about doing good. If these his charities "that soothe and heal and bless, " are not more largely stressed in the accounts of the servant of God, it is because there was something greater, something more lovely and (28."i) 286 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis endearing in him; he was one of the chosen vessels of sanctity who even in their lifetime diffuse all around them the beauty and fragrance of paradise. Felix dc Andreis was recognized as a true saint by all who knew him. Dec)) humility, the broad foundation of all virtues, and sin- cere and deep love for God and God's children were the Alpha and Omega of his life and all his labors. In his Soliloquy No. 9, he says: " 1 see very clearly, when I collect my thoughts, that Divine Bounty began to call me to the sweet intercourse of contemplation from my very child- hood. I can very distinctly picture to myself the unspeakable delights which I once felt when a child, while listening to one of my aunts, who was singing some hymns on the love of God and the infancy of Mary, as Ave walked one evening in the gardens of Count Berengar. T did not then foresee what would be the result and, though I was somewhat ac- quainted with the writings of St. Theresa and St. John of the Cross, I had no precise idea of the treasures hidden in their mystic works." 1 We have then in Father Felix de Andreis a happy union of the con- templative and the active life, rich in results both for time and eternity. We have in his memory a constant inspiration beautifully symbolized by his luminous star that shone above the place of his happy death in broad daylight, during the funeral services held in the Cathedral of St. Louis. Father De Andreis died on the Feast of St. Theresa ; his earthly remains, long since glorified by miraculous occurrences, are the greatest treasure of St. Mary's of the Barrens. But as history loves to dwell on the deeds and vicissitudes of her heroes, it seems to be time to recall some of the things, either accomplished or attempted in St. Louis by the Vicar General, Superior, Pastor and Saint. On his arrival in the new episcopal See of St. Louis, Father de Andreis took up his abode with the Bishop, in the "episcopal palace," that is, the old stone presbytere built in 1778 by Father Bernard de Limpach. Here he established the novitiate of his congregation with three novices. The others were as yet with Father Rosati in St. Thomas Sem- inary, Kentucky, but were soon to be established in the Seminary at the Barrens. "I have not enjoyed the consolation of seeing Father Rosati for more than a year," wrote Father De Andreis at this time, "nor have I any pros- pect of being soon able to do so; for the ties that bind us both to our respective duties are so close, that they will not allow us to absent our- selves under any pretext. ' ' 2 One of his novices died, Father Joseph Caretti, a virtuous and able priest, only twenty -eight years old. "He was a Canon of Porto Maurizio, and his name was Joseph Caretti" writes the Master of Novices. "1 attended him in his long illness, which was consumption, and he frequent- 1 Letter in Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. 2 "Life of Father De Andreis," by Bishop Kosati, p. 214. Father Felix Be Andn is 287 ly mentioned to me his desire of joining our Missionaries. He died on the Feast of St. Francis Xavier, our great protector, at the very moment that I left his bedside to receive into the novitiate his worthy companion a priest named Andrew Ferrari, who was likewise from Porto Maurizio. 3 At the same time, two others were received: Rev. Francis Xavier Dahmen, a deacon, and Rev. Joseph Tichitoli, a subdeacon. Both Ferrari and Tichitoli were about 26 years of age ; whilst Dahmen was twenty-nine. They were all excellent subjects, had postulated for more than a year, and after the customary spiritual retreat, were admitted into our novi- tiate and seminary, on the same memorial day, December 3rd." But Tichitoli was forced to leave for the milder climate of the south, whilst Father Ferrari was needed at Vincennes, and Father Dahmen at Ste. Genevieve, Father Acquaroni, whom Father de Andreis had called from Kentucky, was sent a few days after his arrival, to take charge of St. Charles, Dardennes and Portage des Sioux. Now Father de Andreis was alone once more, as the Bishop was obliged to absent himself from home a good part of the time, and even Brother Blanka was transferred to the Barrens, where his services were absolutely necessary. Yet the brave and loyal missionary did not repine. Indeed, he deeply felt this isolation and the manifold crosses of his position. "I assure you" he wrote to Father Baccari, "That when I think of Italy, it appears to me an earthly paradise, in comparison with America ; and I cannot con- ceive, how so many Europeans undergo such privations and trials, for a miserable worldly gain. I know that, were it not for the glory of God and the salvation of souls, I Avould not stay where I am for all the gold in the world." 4 The love of God and of immortal souls was ever the Christian hero's compelling principle. "You tell me" he writes to his Superior in Rome, "you tell me that I am burdened beyond my strength. Perhaps I am, but this is only because of my weakness. I must however tell you some- thing which redounds to the glory of God, to whom alone it is due : the number of adult baptisms is very great. I have sometimes baptized entire families at a time, during High Mass, explaining one by one, all the baptismal ceremonies to a crowd of people." 5 As Father De An- dreis tells us in another place, it was customary to preach on the occasions of Baptisms and marriages as well as of funerals. The 'onus praedicandi,' the office of preaching, was a real onus or burden to Father De Andreis, because it had to be done in either English or French, his native tongue being the liquid Italian. In one of his letters to Father Sicardi he writes: "besides the dis- charge of our daily duties, we are obliged to labor not a little to translate 3 "Life of Father De Andreis," by Rosati, p. 215, ef. p. 201. * Op. cit., p. 197, ef. p. 163. 5 Op. cit., pp. 200 and 201. 288 History of Hu Archdiocese of St. Louis our sermons into French and English . Our greatest difficulty is not in writing, bul in speaking and pronouncing the language." 6 Among tlic poignanl sorrows afflicting Father De Andreis' loving heart was the decay of faith and morals he witnessed all around him. Here are some of his experiences: "As to the Catholics, here who are the "domestic] fidei, " they have the first right to the zeal of the mission- ary, yet, on account of their ignorance and indolence present to the zeal and vigilance of the evangelical laborer a sight similar to that formerly beheld by the Prophet Ezechiel, a vast plain covered with dry bones, devoid of life. This is a spectacle fit to discourage the most active zeal, for really one knows not where to begin. On account of their constant intercourse with sectarians and infidels of every kind, their ideas of the first and most essential points of Christianity have become distorted : and unfortunately they show very little inclination to reform them. "For example, I happened to be in a place, where a rich merchant, who enjoyed the credit of being the principal supporter of Catholicity, treated us with all possible attention and kindness. But one evening I went to visit him, he began, while we were at supper, to assert that one can be saved in any sect, provided only he be an honest man. And he held so tenaciously to his opinion, that it was but with the greatest trouble I convinced him that out of the Catholic Church there is no salvation. Another missionary told me that while he was staying in the house of one of the best Catholics, whose wife was said to be the most excellent Christian in these parts, this fervent lady told him one day that she highly esteemed the custom of assisting at Mass and hearing Sermons, but as to confession, it Avas, she said, a most abominable prac- tice. We meet with others of the same description, who are not well convinced of the existence of hell, and who are ignorant of the most essential points of religion. It is pretty hard work to remove their prejudices." 7 How very familiar these ancient objections to religion must appear to the advanced thinkers of our day, inside and outside of the Church. But the zealous disciple of St. Vincent de Paul, could not be discouraged by the prevalence of these vagaries. "We can do the most good with the youth of both sexes who really are a consolation to our hearts. They make their first communion with admirable fervor, and afterwards continue to frequent the sacraments and attend catechism. The young girls, especially, delight me by their candor and simplicity; they are lilies of purity, angels in human form, and their piety will do much good among the rising generation. ' ' Others are caught on their death-bed, at the latest : we have some of every nation, even Italians, who know how to pay compliments, but i; "Life of ratlin- De Andreis," by Rosati, pp. 184 and ill. " Op. cit., pp. L90 an. I L91. Father Felix De Andreis 289 who are in reality, perhaps, more estranged from religion than any other people. The Irish are generally very fervent, and show no mercy towards Protestants." 8 Whilst in Rome Father De Andreis had witnessed the wonderful effects of the devotion of the Tre Ore and introduced it among his people in St. Louis, in Holy Week, 1818, as he writes to his friend Rosati : "We held the best we could the functions of the Holy Week with the help of Father Prior and Father Savine, making great use of the stuff brought from Europe. The Bishop made the design and the Brother with a carpenter built up a sepulchre which, without exaggeration, would not have been out of place in Rome, so magnificent were the draperies, so many the lights and so majestic the appearance of the whole. Two Civic- Guards, changing every hour, kept sentry-duty day and night before the Sepulchre; on the evening there was vocal and instrumental music for the Stabat Mater and the Hymn; An Sang pui mi Dieu va repandre. . . On Good Friday evening we had the function called the Tre Ore carried out in every detail ; the setting was magnificent beyond belief. ' ' 9 There is one more gem to be noticed in the saintly missionary's crown of merit, although it was but a desire never to be realized by him • The idea of a missionary life among the Indians. Even before he set foot upon the land to be hallowed by his labors, whilst preparing himself for his life-work under the roof of St. Thomas Seminary at Bardstown, he gave strong expression to his desires and hopes. Writing to the Vicar General of the Congregation of the Missions at Rome, under date of January 5, 1817, Father De Andreis says: "I feel strongly impelled to devote myself, in a particular manner, to the conversion of the Indian tribes who live beyond the Mississippi. Here (In Kentucky) no trace of them remains, while on the contrary, the Mississippi, which serves as a boundary to the United States, and separates them from the immense wilderness, which extends even to the Pacific Coast, flows by St. Louis, and makes of it the central point of all these savage nations. Among these so far, the light of the Gospel has never penetrated, though they seem well disposed to receive it. Wherefore I intend, when our seminary is well established, to leave Father Rosati at its head, and to wend my way, in Nomine Domini, along the banks of the Mississippi and Missouri preaching the gospel to these poor people. Before I leave St. Louis I will have the Catechism translated into their language. This I can do with the assistance of some Indians who come from time to time to St. Louis, and persons of the place who are pretty well acquainted with their Language. I have received from men of experience much information, both with regard to the difficulties to be encountered and the manner of 8 "Life of Father De Andreis," by Rosati, p. 192. 9 Letter to Father Rosati, St. Louis, April 2, 1818. A copy of this letter is in the Archives of the Chancery of the Archdiocese of St. Louis. Vol. I in 290 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis overcoming them, and, with the help of God, the undertaking seems as easy as if I already witnessed its execution. I shall have much to suffer, hut of this I do not think, nor will I allow my mind to rest on it one moment." 10 This was not a mere romantic notion, such as many others have entertained since the days of Chateaubriand: a glorious free life with nature and the noble red man of the forest and prairie. No, De Andreis knew better, and his aspirations were immeasurably higher. "To tell the truth the Indians are uncivilized, ferocious, inconstant and haughty. They habitually lead a very austere life, and sometimes spend several days without taking any nourishment ; but then, if they chance to kill a buffalo or a deer in their hunt, they will eat it all at once, almost raw. They wear very little clothes and torment their bodies to please 'the Great Spirit.' The old people with the women and children remain in the wigwams, but the others are nearly always away hunting beasts, whose skins they prepare very skillfully, to exchange them with the Americans for provisions and strong liquors. They are exceedingly fond of liquor, so much so, that this propensity constitutes one of the principal obstacles with whieh the missionary has to contend, in the work of their conversion." 11 And a little later: "They acknowledge one only God, whom, in their language, they call Chissemenetu, which means, Father of Life ; to him they address their prayers and offer the first fumes of their pipes. To please this god they treat themselves most cruelly. Indeed, their whole religion consists in these practices, some of which are too horrible to relate. They live like the very animals of which they are constantly in pursuit. Their chase provides them with food and scanty clothing (for they go almost naked), and enables them to trade with the white people, who in exchange for furs and venison, give them powder, spirits, paint to decorate their bodies and silver rings for their ears and nostrils. Their aspect is frightful, and one feels almost inclined to doubt if their reasoning powers be fully developed." 12 Such a companionship was naturally repulsive to his feelings : but the Indians were children of God, and bore the image of God upon their souls. And they were the poorest of the children of God, and his heart went out to them in love and tenderness. "These poor creatures" he writes to Father Sicardi, "seem inca- pable of forming any idea of spiritual and divine things. They know that there is a God, and they begin all their employments by an act of i° Op. cit v p. 157. It was the common opinion at the time that the "country to the westward of our frontiers, quite to the Mississippi was intended to be a desert for the Indians to hunt in and inhabit." Baeroft, vol. V, p. 64. ii Op. cit., p. 158. 12 Op. cit., pp. 179 and 180. Father Felix Be Andreis 291 worship (a fact which should make many Christians blush with shame). When they come to trade with the white people, they begin to smoke, and directing the first cloud on high, they say : ' Anaregare kii chakanda ' which means : ' may this ascend to the divinity. ' But these notions only concern the present life. They believe that God has given them a religion different from ours, and if they are told of a future life, they, under- stand nothing about it. With patience and time, however something will be made of them." 13 Always hopeful amid a thousand discouragements, and consumed with the zeal for the kingdom of God, Father De Andreis seemed to be on the point of attaining his purpose. In 1820 Bishop Du Bourg was preparing to visit "those immense forests," and Father De Andreis was invited to accompany him. ' ' Alleluia ! Deo Gratias ! " he wrote from the Barrens. ' ' At length we are to commence a mission among the savages. I am to have the happiness of accompanying the Bishop to visit these unfortunate people!" 14 But these wishes were, as Father Rosati wrote, the last sparks of that flame of charity which burned within his heart ; for he was soon to depart for heaven, for which he constantly sighed, that he might be united forever with his God. Like St. Vincent, who was not able before his death to behold the establishment of his missionaries in the Island of Madagascar, for which he so ardently longed and had made so many sacrifices ; like St. Francis Xavier, who had to stop on the threshold of China without entering the kingdom, because God called him to Him- self, so was Father De Andreis to see the Indian tribes, and to approach them, without having it in his power to liberate them from the bands of their ignorance. God destined others after his death, to undertake this work. 13 "Life of Father De Andreis," by Rosati, p. 193. » Op. cit., p. 205. Chapter 8 ST. MARY'S OF THE BARRENS UNDER FATHER ROSAT1 The Ecclesiastical Seminary of Louisiana, St. Mary's of the Barrens, had a remarkably peculiar origin. At the command of Christ's vice- gerent, Pope Pius VII, it sprang into being in the Eternal city, when Father Charles Dominic Sicardi, Vicar General of the Congregation of the Missions, and Bishop Louis William Du Bonrg came to an agreement as tn the establishment of a mission in Louisiana under the saintly Father Felix De Andreis. For the eighth article of this instrument reads as follows: "They, (the Priests of the Mission) will earnestly strive to promote and carry out, as soon as possible the erection of a Seminary." 1 The organization of the Seminary was at once completed. Father De Andreis was Rector, Fathers Joseph Rosati and John Baptist Acquaroni, both members of the Congregation, and Father Pereira, a postulant, were the professors; and Leo Deys, a Propaganda student, represented the student body, soon to be augmented by Francis X. Dahmen and Casto Gonzalez. The small but vigorous shoot, was transplanted to Bordeaux, where it was tenderly cared for by the Archbishop of that city, for the space of four months and a half. Here the Seminary grew and prospered. As Father O'Malley tells us: "All, priests and students, devoted them- selves to the study of French, which they knew they would need on the Louisiana Mission. While the priests exercised the functions of the ministry according to the Archbishop 's dispositions, the three students enrolled for the American Seminary reviewed a part of their philosophy under the -direction of Father Rosati. English, too, was added to the program of studies, when Father De Andreis announced the astonishing news of the Bishop's abandonment of the original plan of going to New ( )rleans as reasons of prudence dictated that he should settle in St. Louis. A fitting conclusion to the Bordeaux seminary regime came with the conferring of Minor Orders on the Feast of the Ascension, May 22. Bishop Du Bourg had reached Bordeaux the day previous accompanied by a young cleric from Como, Mr. Joseph Tichitoli. All were now in high spirits and at once preparations Avere made for sailing. A contract was finally entered into with the Master of the American brig "The Banger;" and on the Feast of Corpus Christi, June 13, the company, thirteen in all, the priests and clerics "in short dress and round hats," climbed up the ropeJadder aboard the rough sailing vessel. The wind i "Life of Father De Andreis," p. 60. (292) St. Mary's of the Barrens under Father Bosati 293 was in their favor, the sails were set, the anchor weighed, and presently t hey had left Europe for the sake of the Master. ' ' 2 The thirteen that set sail for America were : Five priests : Fathers De Andreis, C. M., Rosati, C. M., Acquaroni, C. M., Caretti and Ferrari ; four clerics : Messrs. Deys, Dahmen, Gonzalez and Tichitoli ; one brother : Brother Blanka, C. M., and three postulant brothers: Flegifont, Boran- vanski and de Latre. On board the Ranger the Seminary-life and work continued as at Bordeaux. At the journey's end the growing tree was replanted in American soil, first in St. Mary's at Baltimore, then, after a toilsome journey across the mountains and down the Ohio River, at the Seminary of St. Thomas, near Bardstown, where Bishop Flaget sheltered and fostered it for a year or more, until everything should be prepared for its taking root in the fruitful soil of Missouri. At St. Thomas the two Seminaries flourished side by side. Father De Andreis taught Moral Theology. During the scholastic year 1817-1 si 8, after Father De Andreis' departure for St. Louis, the lion's share of the ecclesiastical training fell to Father Rosati. The two daily classes of dogmatic and moral theology, the ceremonies, and plain chant, the direc- tion of the students — all were in his hands. "There are," he writes to his brother Nicola in Sora, "among my pupils, representatives of almost every nation of Europe : Italians, Frenchmen, Germans, Dutch, Spaniards and English-speaking Americans. In class we speak Latin, but quite frequently, if they wish to propose any difficulty, they fall into Italian, French or English. For the sake of practice, I answer these difficulties in the language in which they are proposed." 3 On the 2nd and 3rd of December, 1817, Bishop Du Bourg had brought to land at Annapolis a party of twenty-nine new recruits for his diocese, thirteen of whom were students : Louis Betrand, Auguste Jeanjean and Joseph Valentine (Subdeacons) ; Hercules Brassac, Des- moulins, Philip Hosten, Francis Niel, David De Parcq, Constantine Maenhaut, Leo De Neckere, Perrodin and Angelus De Geithre (Clerics). There were six priests in the party, among them Father Anthony Blanc, the future Archbishop of New Orleans. The other members were Christian Brothers and others religious. Bishop Flaget, "the most holy, learned, humble and affable man, he ever knew," as Father De Andreis said, was glad to take this little army in his safe-keeping for an indefinite time, and in addition, volunteered to accompany the Bishop of Louisiana to St. Louis. Only Father Stephen Badin, and one of the Seminarians, Francis Niel, accompanied the prelates on their voyage down the Ohio River and up the Mississippi to St. Genevieve, Kaskaskia - O'Malley, Eev. Martin J., "The Centenary of the St. Louis Diocesan Seminary," in ''St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. I, p. 43. 3 Letter to Nicola Rosati, op. cit., p. 46. 294 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis and St. Louis. They Left Bardstown on December 12th, and arrived in St. Louis on January 5th, 1818. Bishop Du Bourg's first care after the glamour and excitement of his installation had subsided, was to make permanent provision for his Seminary. His mind had been apparently to place it in St. Louis, but Providence had ordered it otherwise. Shortly after his arrival a dele- gation of Catholics of English descent, from the Barrens, a settlement situated about eighty miles south of the city, and twenty-four miles from Ste. Genevieve, waited upon the Bishop and made known their desire to have the contemplated Seminary located among them. They had been informed about the proposed institution by Father Marie Joseph Dun- and, the Trappist Monk from Florissant, who for three or four years had been ministering to their spiritual needs. Father Dunand, they said, had also counselled them to offer the Bishop a tract of land for the new foundation. They had proposed the matter to Bishop Flaget in October, 1817, on his visit to St. Louis as the Bishop's ambassador, and with his encouragement they had acquired a tract of 640 acres, the title to which they would convey to him, as soon as the establishment of the Seminary at the "Barrens" was agreed upon. 4 On further inquiry, the Bishop found that the "Barrens" was an ideal place for the Seminary, the name itself being, not a designation for a barren and unfruitful piece of land, but rather the equivalent of what the French pioneers were wont to call a "beautiful prairie" amid the surrounding woods. As for the people of the Barrens, Father Dun- and and others were full of praise and admiration. The earlist settlers, the Tuckers and Moores and Laytons, had come to Missouri in 1801 and 1802, and a constant stream had followed them from Maryland and Kentucky."' The first chapel in Perry County had been built and blessed in 1812 by Vicar General Maxwell, Pastor of St. Genevieve, who also attended the congregation until his death in 1814. Prior to 1812 Mass had been said occasionally at the home of Old Joseph Tucker. After 1814 the Trappist, Marie Joseph Dunand, had visited Perryville three times a year, from his home at Florissant, as guest of Old Joseph Tucker, who had eight sons and one daughter, all, except the youngest, married and settled about him in good homes. 6 The April following, Bishop Du Bourg journeyed to the "Barrens" in company with Father Dunand to meet the people, to learn at first hand their condition, to examine personally the nature of the soil, to study the prospects which the future held out. He found the people, honest and industrious: "the best set I ever knew,'' 7 the ground easy * Dunand' 's Diary in "Records of the American Catholic Historical Society," vol. XXVII, pp. 49 and 50. 5 Letter of Isidor Moore in Archives of the St. Louis Archdiocese. 6 Dunand 's Diary, 1. c, p. 45. i Letter to Father Rosati, April 22, 1818, Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. St. Mary's of the Barrens under Father Rosati 295 of cultivation, the climate healthy. He decided to build his Seminary at the Barrens. Thereupon the following 1 resolutions were drawn up : 1. A tax shall be levied on all Catholics, of the settlement for the purchase of the section of land destined for the new foundation (the purchase price was actually $9000.00). 2. The people of the parish engage themselves to do personally their share of the work in the construction of the building. 3. A sum of $7500.00 shall be subscribed by the people of the parish, to be paid in five yearly instalments of $1500.00 each, for the the purpose of aiding in the erection on the premises of a Seminary of learning, contributing to the expense of the church services, and to the maintenance of the missionaries. The total amount once paid, the Catholics of the settlement shall be free from, all further obligation either of assuring a salary to the priests, or of extraordinary contribu- tions. Thej r shall, in return, convey the title of the property to the Bishop. They agree, moreover, to feed, during the first year, the crew of workmen engaged in the construction of the buildings." 8 The sum of $7,500 was certainly a most noble offering, made at a time when money was scarce and many of the colonists were be- ginners. It seems to have been considered a foundation, the interest on which, was to go to the support of the Church and clergy forever. The work to be done on the house by each parishioner was an extra burden assumed by the people. It is perhaps not the most efficient way to build, yet it was and is the usual one in primitive communities. Building operations were begun at once. Father Charles Lacroix was appointed architect, to draw up a plan for a house, similar to St. Thomas Seminary at Bardstown, two and a half story high, with a basement containing two halls, and two cellars each 25x17 feet. The building eventually turned out to be "a kind of combination of log- house, frame-house, brick-house and stone-house, having a little of every kind ; it was to be plastered and decent inside and outside. ' ' 9 The site chosen was a quarter of a mile south of the old log-church erected in 1814. The building, at the time, seemed a vast undertaking, "and it was so indeed. But the Bishop, nothing daunted by the manifold difficulties that arose, threw the entire force of his personality into the work, not even disdaining to help the laborers in carrying lumber and re- maining the whole day in the heat of the sun. On April 22nd, 1818, the Bishop wrote to Father Rosati, at Bardstown, that the house would be ready to receive his now homeless colony late in next Fall. But this s Archives of the Procurator Genera] C. M. Rome — "America," p. II, quoted by O 'Malley in ' ' St. Louis Catholic Historical Review, ' ' vol. I, p. 48. 9 De Andreis to Rosati, April 20, 1818, Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. 296 History oj tht Archdiocesi of St, Louis fond hope could no1 be realized. The anxious prelate was forced to confess towards the end of July: "Whatever diligence may be made, the house at the Barrens will not be ready this Winter. Still 1 want to keep my word, and to have all here in October. Accordingly 1 have rented a house at St. Genevieve for six months, from the first of October, large enough to house almost all of you. Father Pratte and one or two houses of the Barrens will reeeive the rest." 10 Now, whilst patiently though eagerly, awaiting the completion of his Seminary Building, the Bishop orders the exodus of the Professors and Seminarians from their temporary home at Bardstown. The letter of instructions for the journey is dated "At the Barrens, July 29th, 1818." Father Rosati and one companion is to make the journey Ivy land over Shawneetown : Two horses of the Bishop had been left at St. Thomas : Old Mr. Joseph Tucker was to be our guide. The main body of the caravan and the baggage were to come to St. Genevieve by flat boat. Some of the party were to remain at St. Genevieve, for a time, among them the three Brothers of the Christian Schools, who were destined for the Academy at St. Genevieve. But as the Bishop sent Father Rosati several supplementary letters of instruction as to the journey, some of which did not reach the leader of the caravan, some misunderstandings arose. Bidding good bye to their friends at St. Thomas, the Seminary of Louisiana entered upon its final remove on the 15th of September 1818. With hearts full of gratitude for the kindness of their old friends of Bardstown but looking forward with glad anticipations of the peace and joy awaiting them in their destined home at the Barrens, the twenty- three priests, Seminarians and Brothers started out on their last journey, "the last of danger and distress," as they fondly hoped. For the rest of the journey and its happy end we will quote the words of Father O'Malley: "From Louisville, they travelled to the mouth of the Ohio in a flat-boat, not more than eighteen feet long and wide in proportion, which scarcely allowed standing-room for the twenty-three passengers. It leaked so badly as to be repeatedly in danger of sinking; besides, the roof, in a very heavy rain which lasted sometime, proved porous, and for several days they had to bear with the further inconvenience of wet baggage and wet clothes. On landing on the right bank of the Mississippi, which was in the Diocese of Louisiana, a cross was erected, and with gladsome hearts they sang the Vexilla regis prodeunt. A forced delay here of ten days, due to the miscarriage of the original plans caused them added suffering. But they were at last in their own ecclesiastical "home," and every obstacle vanished into air, every favor- 10 Du Bourg to Rosati, Kaskaskia, August 2, 1818, Archives of St. Louis \n-hdioeese. St. Morn's of the Barrens under Father Bosatl 297 able circumstance hardened into adamant. The six horses and wagons sent from the Barrens finally reached them, and presently the caravan was plodding its way northward, some on horseback, some on foot. On October the first, they reached the Barrens. For some unrecorded reason, the plans of the Bishop had been changed. Instead of going to Ste. Genevieve, the Seminarians were conducted to the house (about two miles from the Church) which Mrs. Sarah Hayden, a pious and wealthy widow of the ' ' Barrens, ' ' had placed at the disposal of the Bishop until the Seminary should be ready for occupancy. Here were the Seminarians housed : here was the Seminary begun. The Bishop's hopes had been fulfilled, his ambition had been realized, his plans had been accomplished. The tree was planted. The St. Louis Diocesan Seminary, whose leafage and blossoming and fruit- age we of a later day have seen, was a reality." 11 Indeed, there still remained much work to be done ere the Seminary could be accounted complete, "numeris omnibus absolutum. " It was a source of deep regret to Father De Andreis that he could not take part in the erection of the material house ; God had appointed him the special work of forming the spiritual edifice, whilst others, and among them his friend and favorite disciple, Father Rosati, were erecting the material one. The Seminarians, also, devoted their time of recreation to the work on the Seminary building. On the 5th of January, 1819, Father Francis Cellini, who had been Canon at the celebrated Hospital de St. Spiritu in Rome, arrived with two com- panions and was sent to the Barrens to make his novitiate and inci- dentally to help in the building of the Seminary. Both Father De Andreis and Father Rosati speak of Father Cellini in the highest terms of praise: "Father Cellini has given the most beautiful proofs of attachment to the Congregation and of the virtues which must be in a missionary,'' writes Father De Andreis, and again "Father Cellini has to be occupied with many things, that are rather infavorable to recollection : yet Bishop Du Bourg writes to me, that he is a valuable subject, and Father Rosati is most pleased with him." In his letter of October 1920 Father De Andreis advises his Superior in Rome: "Father Cellini has made his vows to our mutual satisfaction He can now speak English sufficient- ly, and exercises the holy ministry. Moreover he is the only one among us who has any understanding of temporal affairs. Accordingly, I have appointed him Procurator. Father Rosati 's opinion of his chief assistant is summed up in a few pregnant words : ' ' Father Cellini is our Procurator, Physician, Mailman, Mason." In regard to Father u O'Malley, op. cit,, p. 49. 298 History of Ihr Archdiocese of St. Louis Cellini's knowledge and skill as a physician, the Rector of the Seminary, Rosati, writes, October 18th, 1820: "We have had eight of us sick at the same time. Divine Providence favored us by sending Father Cellini. Be is quite a skillful physician. The visit of the nearest doctor would have COSl us thirty dollars." It is Father Rosati who gives us the following pen picture of Cellini's humble and willing spirit: "On recreation days we usually do not indulge in any other diversion than laboring at some needed work, either in the garden or the fields. Father Cellini is usually the leader. That man knows and can do any- thing." From his post at the Barrens Father Cellini made regular missionary visits to the ancient, yet sorely neglected parish of New .Madrid, at a distance of more than two hundred miles from the Seminary, where he not only kept the faith alive, hut also gained a number of converts. 12 The first fruits of the beautiful tree planted and reared with so much labor and watered by the tears of such holy men, were: Father Francis Niel (March 19th, 1818), Michael Portier, the future Bishop of Mobile (September 29th, 1818), Des Moulins and Hercules . Brassac (November 1st, 1818), Joseph Tichitoli (December 14th, 1818), Eugene Michaud and Edmund Saulnier (September 22nd, 1822), Martin (October 1822), John M. Odin and John Audizio (May 4th, 1823). On the 5th of September, 1823, Louis Tucker, a native of the Barrens was admitted to the Seminary. Elated with these good results, Father Rosati writes home from the Grand Seminaire, May 24, 1823: "Our seminary is doing very well, every year it furnishes a few priests to the diocese. True, up to the present time we have received students from Europe ; nevertheless, we have some belonging to this country also, who give us great hopes. Time was needed to form them. We have at present four priests, sixteen ecclesiastics, twelve secular boarders, and twenty-five day scholars. We have nine brothers of our Congrega- tion of St. Lazarus who work, partly in the fields and partly in the house. Great good might be accomplished, could we send out mission- aries among the Protestants and Catholics scattered over a vast extent of territory; but we are hard pressed with all we have to do at home. For besides the Seminary in which we are obliged to conduct a great many classes, we have a very large parish, composed of excellent Catholics who approach the Sacraments frequently and who give us work which is not without fatigue, hut which is not without pleasure either." 13 12 Cf. Rothensteiner, "Chronicles of an Old Missouri Parish,'' passim, and Holweek, "Ein Blatt aus alter Zeit," in " Pastoral Blatt," vol. LIX, p. 82 and 131. 13 Archives of the Procurator General C. M., Rome, apud Rosati, "Life of De Andreis," p. 193. St. Mary's of the Barrens under Father Rosati 299 We will conclude this chapter with the noble praise given by Father Rosati to the people of the Barrens. It is more than a patent of nobility to the Catholics of Perry County: "You probably know what a fine population we have in this country. The Catholics number more than one hundred and sixty families. All approach the Sacraments frequently. We are kept busy every Sunday, hearing confessions, and there is always a large number of Communions. There are no balls, no saloons, no luxury. It is a great consolation to see these good people, even those who are employed, practicing their religion with- out human respect. Judges, representatives, senators are not ashamed to kneel before a priest to beg his blessing. At the doorway of their court house, a cross bears witness that they glory in being Catholics." 14 14 Letter of August 16, 1823, Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. Chapter 9 THE LADIES OF THE SACRED HEART Among the followers and helpers of Bishop Du Bourg in estab- lishing religion on a firm basis in the Mississippi Valley, there were two persons who, even in their life-time, were regarded as true saints. Father Felix De Andreis CM. and Mother Phillipine Duchesne S. de S.S.C. Both considered themselves as failures; and yet the saintly lives of both are now recognized as the chief inspiration of those un- propitious days of the early dawn. Both were drawn together in holy friendship such as that of St. Francis de Sales and St. Frances de Chantal, and both are now proposed to holy Church for the honors of Beatification. Of Felix de Andreis we have Avritten a chapter, all too meager, indeed, compared with his greatness and nobility. Of Mother Phillipine Du Chesne we must now give a brief account. Four years after the foundation of the Society of the Sacred Heart by Madeleine Louise Sophie Barat, now a canonized Saint, Rose Phillipine Du Chesne, who had been a novice at the Visitation Convent of Saint Marie D'en Haut, but whom the terrors of the revolution had prevented from making the solemn vows, applied to Madam Barat for admission to the new Society, and offered her the rather dilapidated convent which her family had secured for her. Mother Barat gladly accepted the offer, and leaving the house at Amiens in the care of Madame Bandemont, set out with two companions to found the new house of her Society at Grenoble. Here in the weather- worn convent of Saint Marie-d'en-Haut she found Madam Duchesne, her ever dear Phillipine, with an assembly of other religious belonging to several Orders, and assumed the direction of the community. Follow- ing the rule "Firmness sometimes, harshness never, charity and gentle- ness everywhere and always," Mother Barat 's gentleness conquered all hearts and bound them together in the love of the Sacred Heart. In due time Mother Duchesne made her solemn vows, served at various places and was finally elected Secretary General to Mother Barat, 1 But the aspirations of the gentle Phillipine were for a very different manner of life. From her earliest years her desire had been to carry the gospel 1 On the early days of Mother Du Chesne, Cf. the Life written by L. P. .) . Baunard, translated by Lady Pullerton, and the recent publication by Marjory Erskine, 1926. " Baunard 's Life of Mother Barat," chapters VI, VII, XVI and XXIX, contain the story. (300) The Ladies of the Sacred Heart 301 to the poor Indians across the sea. For this she had prayed and this she asked as the greatest favor from Mother Barat. Now the position as Secretary General seemed to preclude all hope of her ever attaining her heart's desire. But Providence found a way when all hope seemed to be at an end. On the 14th of January 1817, Mgr. Du Bourg, Bishop of Louisiana, called on Mother Barat at the Convent in Paris, and asked for a colony of Sisters for his wild-west diocese. Mother Duchesne heard of it, and at once began to importune her Superior to send her to the missions. Mother Barat reluctantly consented. For Bishop Du Bourg would not take a refusal, and of all her sisters, Madame Duchesne seemed best fitted for the onerous task. Matters were now quickly arranged with the Bishop, and it was agreed that the following spring Mother Duchesne and her companions should start for Louisiana. Two choir-sisters, Octavie Berthold and Eugenie Aude, and two lay- sisters. Catherine Lamarre and Marguerite Manteau, were chosen from a crowd of applicants to accompany Mother Duchesne. On the 21st of March 1818, Holy Saturday, they left the shores of France in a small sailing-vessel, the Rebecca. Father Martial, one of the Louisiana Priests, accompanied them. On the 25th of May, the stout little ship entered the muddy waters of the Mississippi, and on Friday the 29th, the Feast of the Sacred Heart, landed its passengers in New Orleans. The way- worn pilgrims were hospitably entertained at the Ursuline Convent. After a long delay catised by the lack of instructions from the Bishop, they set out for St. Louis. Mgr. Du Bourg 's episcopal city, and arrived there on August the 22nd. Here they were informed that their real destination was the town of St. Ferdinand de Florissant on the Missouri River, where a tract of land was bought for their use. But as their convent there was not built as yet, and as the Bishop was then fully occupied with his Cathedral and Seminary, they were to take up their abode in the city of St. Charles, in a house belonging to Mrs. Duquet. 2 Their Father Confessor, Benedict Richard, was to have his residence in the same house, and also to take charge of the Parish of St. Charles. Father Benedict Richard had accompanied the nuns from La Fourche in Louisiana to St. Louis. At Kaskaskia the chief of the Illinois and his daughters came with other Indian braves to welcome him and his companions. "They were on horseback, and dressed in beaded gar- ments and so presented an imposing and interesting spectacle," wrote Mother Duchesne. 3 Father Richard was not, it seems, entirely suited to fill the office of the Spiritual Director of a newly-founded Community of Sisters. A man of more cheerful disposition like Father Martial would have been preferable. The kindly and humble Madame Duchesne 2 The house was at one time the residence of the Spanish Commandanl of St. Charles. 3 Erskine, op. eit., p. 154, lot;, and IM. 302 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis seems to imply this in her little pen-picture of Father Richard: "Mr. Richard," she wrote "like his name-sake, the apostle of Michigan, is a true priest, according to the heart of God. His large and emaciated frame, his meditative and austere face, lend him the appearance of an anchoret, rendering him better calculated to inspire respect than to elicit affection. For all that, he is none the less an excellent man, and a full noble character who hides beneath his extreme reserve of words and manner a devoted heart." 4 The sisters felt disappointed in the place assigned to them; and the priest could do but little to dispel the gloom. They had hoped to found a school for girls in the episcopal city, where they might enjoy the opportunities for spiritual aid and counsel, as well as of a larger sphere of helpfulness to the children. Yet, in the spirit of humble submission, they opened an educational institution in St. Charles, the boarding school numbering but three pupils ; the day school doing fairly well. One precious consolation came to the much harassed Superior in the form of the hearty approval of her undertaking by the reigning Pontiff, Pius VII: Cardinal Fontana's letter read: "His Holiness has been delighted to see how these courageous nuns, abandoning everything to follow Christ, and rising above the weakness of their sex, have not been afraid of crossing the wide ocean in order to transport their pious Institute into savage countries, and thus to devote themselves to the greater glory of God, the honor of the Church, and the salvation of souls. His Holiness wishes them the most prosperous success, and gives, in the most affectionate terms, his apostolic benediction, not only to those already in America, but also to all who are preparing to join them." 5 Such words of praise and encouragement were indeed, a God- send, falling like heavenly dew on parched land. Among the difficulties encountered by the sisters during their stay at St. Charles, the historian of Florissant recounts the following : "Scarcity of wholesome food, of firewood and of hired labor for the rougher household tasks, the disorderly and dissolute ways of a frontier town, the prairie-fires which stole up to the very edge of the settlement, alarming the timid nuns, and above all, the utter lack of prospect that the school would ever develop to such an extent as to make it a means of support for the community." 6 Mother Barat also was dissatisfied with the choice of St. Charles as the home of the Sisters. "How much I regret, my dear daughters, that 4 "History of Florissant," Conway, 35. Cf. Erskine, p. 190. 5 "Life of the Venerable Madeleine Louise Sophia Barat," Roehampton, 1900, p. 199. 6 Father Gilbert J. Garraghan, in his beautiful history of "Saint Ferdinand de Florissant," p. 127. The Ladies of the Sacred Heart 303 Monseigneur has established you in a place so little suited for your -works. In a village and so far from the families who would be inclined to send their daughters to your school, it can never get on. ' ' 7 The Bishop himself became convinced of the necessity of a change of location when he heard Mother Duchesne, the ever-patient soul, complain: "We merely vegetate in this place and forego the good we might do elsewhere." This circumstance, and the fact that the lease of the house was about to expire seemed to call for a removal. Florissant was suggested by the Bishop. In company with Monseigneur and Father De Neckere, Mother Duchesne and Madam Berthold visited the place and accepted the offer of the site. Arrangements were made with Father Dunand, the Pastor of Florissant, for the erection of a brick-building 8 for the nuns. As a temporary home the Bishop assigned the nuns his farm near Florissant, where on a little knoll near the river, there stood a few log cabins of the most primitive kind. The community was to occupy these cells, whilst Father Charles De La Croix, supervisor of the "Bishop's Farm," chose the corn-crib for his temporary shelter. September 5th was set for the migration of the Religious of the Sacred Heart, with their pupils and their belongings, from St. Charles to the Bishop's Farm. Like the landing of the Trappists, tenyears before, the landing of the Nuns was effected at the Charbonnier, a hill on the right bank of the Missouri, near St. Ferdinand. Mother Duchesne has recorded in her Journal some of the picturesque incidents of this migra- tion, illuminating what was unpleasant and sordid with the quiet golden gleams of Humor; "Sister Octavie and two of our pupils next embarked. I was to close the march in the evening with Sister Marguerite, the cows and the hens. But the cows were so indignant at being tied, and the heat was so great, that we were obliged to put off our departure to the cool hours of the Morning. Then by dint of cabbages, which we had taken for them in the cart, they were induced to proceed. I divided my attention between the reliquaries and the hens. AVe crossed the Missouri opposite Florissant. On landing Marguerite and I drew up our charges in line, she the cows, and I the hens, and fed them with motherly solicitude. The Abbe de La Croix came on horseback to meet us. He led the way galloping after our cows, when in their joy at being untied they darted into the woods." 9 Father De La Croix, the mananger of the Bishop's Farm had vacated his cabin in favor of the Sisters, so that room could be made for about ten to fifteen persons. An addition of rough boards was made to Father De La Croix's corn-crib t Garragkan, op. eit., p. 127. Baunard, p. 190. 8 Father Dunand finished the Sisters' Convent before he set out for Prairie du Chien, about 1920. 9 Baunard, op. cit., p. 192. 304 History of tfu Archdiocese of St. Louis residence, and a small chapel was also hastily constructed. Father De La Croix now served as the Sisters' chaplain and confessor: during his mis- sionary trips to the Indians on the Gasconade and the Osage Rivers the saintly Father De Andreis supplied his place: In December 1819, the latter conducted a spiritual retreat for the nuns and their pupils. Whilst the gentle Ladies were busy with their school and the manifold duties of farm-life, their building in the nearby town of St. Ferdinand was making steady progress. At last the "Holy Land,'' as Father Dunand called the new establishment, was ready to receive the community. It was toAvard the end of December that the transfer was made, in bitter cold and driving snow. But on Christmas eve all the members of the institution, sisters and pupils, were reunited in their Convent at the village, and assisted at the mid-night Mass, Father De La Croix celebrated for them. All were full of gratitude and holy joy. But the climate of early Missouri, so changeable and severe in heat and cold proved a sore trial to the ladies accustomed to the mild and equable climate of France. In 1820 all the sisters became seriously ill, but the boarding-school they had established grew apace, numbering in May 1820, twenty-one students. A Novitiate of the Order was established and soon brought most happy results. It was urged by some, Bishop Du Bourg among them, that American girls could not be won for the re- ligious life as practiced by the Ladies of the Sacred Heart : Mother Barat and Mother Duchesne were of the contrary opinion and refused to accept any change. Bishop Du Bourg then approved the Rule for his entire diocese. In their effort to gain recruits in America, the sisters Avere assisted by Father Dunand. On December 22, 1820, Mary Layton, a Native Missourian from Father Dunand 's favorite parish at the Barrens, received the habit of a lay-sister. It was the first Sisters ' re- ception in Upper Louisiana since the beginning of the world. Other de- vout and earnest souls soon followed : Emilie Saint Cyr and Mary Anne Summer then Eulalie Hamilton and Matilda Hamilton of Kaskaskia. Illinois. "They are more pious than we are when they are Catholics, and more constant in their resolutions," 10 wrote Mother Duchesne in the joy of her heart at seeing a beautiful future assured to her Society. Another precious consolation came to the much harassed superior of the struggling community in the form of generous gifts from her old- world friends in Paris and Grenoble. Her brother wished to send her money in order to bring her back to France. "Tell him," she wrote back, "that I beg him to give that sum for the travelling expenses of two more nuns for Louisiana." 11 No regrets, no misgivings, amid all the destitution and endless labor; "We are very happy in our brick-built io Baunard, op. cit., p. 214. ii Erskine, op. cit., p. 227. The Ladies of the Sacred Heart ;J05 house," wrote Madeline Berthold. "In Madame Duchesne we have an example of every virtue." And in the love of the Sacred Heart all found their comfort and joy. It had been one of the pious dreams of Mother Duchesne to erect a monument to the Sacred Heart in the form of a public oratory. Bishop Du Bourg helped to realize her desire by dedicating the new Church of Florissant to the Sacred Heart under the invocation of St. Ferdinand and St. Francis Regis. On the 19th of February 1821, the cornerstone was laid by Father De La Croix. 12 In the same year three more missionary sisters arrived from Paris. The Institute thus en- larged and strengthened was now ready to send out new shoots into other parts of the diocese. The first colony of the Nuns of the Sacred Heart was established at Opelousas, in Lower Louisiana, about 900 miles south of St. Louis, where a Mrs. Mary Smith, a wealthy convert, had offered to Bishop Du Bourg a tract of land on her estate at Grand Coteau and a Convent school to be built and provided at her expense, for the purpose of educating girls and young ladies. The outlay also for bringing the sisters there was to be borne by the foundress. Bishop Du Bourg was pleased with the offer and at once communicated its tenor to Mother Duchesne, who was delighted with the prospect that opened before her. "A hundred years might elapse before Ave received such another offer in a country like this," 13 she wrote to Mother Barat. As Mother Barat approved the plan, Mother Duchesne proposed Madam Eugenie Aude as the superior of the new establishment. "God made her to be a superior," she wrote, "There is no one in the Community who has an equal power of attracting both mothers and children." 14 Mother Eugenie, accompanied by Sister Mary Layton, embarked on the Steamer Rapid for the South, on August 5th. At Plaquemine the steamer grounded. All passengers were landed, the Sisters had to continue their journey in a cart, and then on horse-back. At last, on the 25th of August, they arrived at the house of their benefactress, Mrs. Mary Smith. They were anxious to resume the regular order of religious life in their own house, which, however, was not ready for occupation. The Parish Priest of St. Landry was Father Hercules Brassac. 13 It could not be expected that no trials would attend the first days of this new establishment. Sister Mary became ill, and the superior had to take over her duties. She herself began to suffer; a malignant fever 12 Erskine, op. cit., p. 226. is Baunard, op. cit., p. 220. i* Baunard, op. cit., p. 220. 1 5 Cf. Messrner, S., Archbishop, Hercules Brassac, in "Cath. Hist. Review," vol. III. pp. 392 ss. 306 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis brought her to death's door. Her faith in the power of the Sacred Heart restored her. Mrs. Smith expected to live in the community, without becoming a member; which Madam Aude could not permit. The unpleasantness caused by this misunderstanding was soon overcome by the prudence and gentleness of Mother Aude. In the meantime the sisters sent from France had arrived at Florissant. They were but two : Madame Matheson and Madame Murphy. Madame Murphy, an Irish lady of a generous, amiable and candid disposition, was destined for Grand Coteau, whilst Madame Lucille Matheson remained at Florissant. Grand Coteau soon supplied its share of recruits to the little band of missionaries. Two novices, Madame Gerard and Madame Carmelita Landry, received the habit in 1822. Bishop Du Bourg, who had been at Opelousas, requested that two Sisters from the novitiate at Florissant, Josephine Saint Cyr and Mary Mullanphy, should be sent to Grand Coteau. Mother Duchesne accompanied them to their destination. On the return voyage, the dread scourge of the south, Yellow Fever, attacked the travellers on board the Hecla. Madame Duchesne here became a true Sister of Charity to the afflicted, until her strength was gone. She and her companion were landed on the shore near Natchez and, being denied admittance to the city, at last found a refuge with a good Catholic family across the river. Only after months she found herself strong enough to continue her journey homewards on the steamer Cin- cinnati. She arrived at St. Louis on the 28th of November 1822. The Society of the Sacred Heart was now firmly established on American soil; after many dangers encountered, sorrows and privations borne, and contradictions endured, the little tree, planted by the waters of tribulation, was beginning to stretch forth its branches over all the land. But the fervent though now silent wish of Mother Duchesne, the work of converting the Indians, seemed as far from fulfilment as when she uttered it first to Madam Barat. The romantic glamour of the plan had, indeed, vanished now: "Formerly we entertained the pleasing thought of instructing docile and innocent savages, but the women as well as the men are idle and addicted to drinking. Moreover we have half-castes who unite all the moral miseries of the two races. ' ' 16 Yet in spite of this saddening knowledge, she still held sacred the ideal of her youth. Not now, not for a long time to come, will she be permitted by Providence to gratify her yearning for the labors and perils of the missionary life among the children of the forest and prairie. There is work to be done, there are prayers and sacrifices to be offered is Baunard, op. eit., p. 183. The Ladies of the Sacred Heart 307 up, there are tears to be shed for the immigrant from the Eastern states and from all the countries of Europe, the material for the rising walls of the Church in the Valley of the Mississippi. The care for the Indians was reserved as the reward of her life-work, the crown of all her labors. And the means of accomplishing it were the Jesuit Fathers, who came from far-off Maryland to establish their home on the Bishop's Farm in the immediate neighborhood of her convent in Florissant. Chapter 10 FATHER CHARLES NERINCKX AND JUS RELATIONS WITH ST. LOUIS The Reverend Charles Nerinekx is one of the most admirable characters in the early annals of the Western Church. His works and words have been recorded by some of our most distinguished writers, Archbishop Martin Spalding of Baltimore, Bishop Maes of Covington, Father De Smet, the great apostle of the Indians, Rev. W. J. Howlett and others of note. Being next to Father Stephen Theodore Badin, the earliest priest to foster and spread the faith in the wilderness of Kentucky, and furthermore being the founder of the illustrious Society of the Lorettines, properly styled "The Friends of Mary at the Foot of the Cross," Father Charles Nerinekx deserves a memorable page in our record of the Church's early struggles and triumphs in Kentucky. A place of honor is due to him also in the history of the Diocese of St. Louis. It was through his instrumentality, that the Lorettine Sister- hood was planted in the state of Missouri ; and that, what is perhaps the grandest of all our religious institutions, the Society of Jesus, was brought to the West. Father Nerinekx 's part in these two far reaching events deserves more than a passing notice in our History. Charles Nerinekx was born on October 2nd, 1761, in the village of Herft'elingen in Brabant. He was the oldest of a family of seven brothers and seven sisters, the majority of whom had the happiness of becoming priests or religious. After a regular college course, the youthful Charles entered the Seminary at Mechlin to prepare himself for the priesthood and was there ordained on November 4, 1785. During his stay of eight years at Mechlin, the zealous priest had every opportunity of studying the undercurrents of life among the rich and the poor, the pride and covetousness of the one, the human frailty and contempt of authority of the other class. What wonder then, that Father Nerinekx, like so many other priests of the revolutionary time, became a stern and uncompromising advocate of justice and right, to such a degree, as to incur the charge of Jansenism. 1 The invasion of the Netherlands by the French revolutionary armies under Dumourier and Pichegru in 1793, changed the entire course of Father Nerinekx 's life. Being condemned to death by the revolutionary 1 Not the heresy of Jansenism, but a certain rigorism which savored of the spirit of Jansenism. The quarrel of Fathers Nerinekx and Badin with the Dominicans is exhaustively treated by Father O'Daniel in the "Catholic Historical Review," vol. VI, pp. 15-45. (308) Father Charles Nerinckx and His Relations with St. Louis 3016 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis This desperate plan of removing the entire Sisterhood of more than two hundred persons from Kentucky to Missouri was, of eourse, impos- sible, yet, Bishop Plaget's hasty word rankled in the good Father's heart. Besides, the Bishop had informed him as to complaints urged against him. There was no alternative but to leave Kentucky. On the 29th of May 1824, he wrote the farewell letter, "to the dear Mother, Mothers and Sisters of the Loretto House and Society," in which he gives a brief account of his life and states the three great causes for his departure : 1. The impossibility of holding out for want of temporals, having no help but from Europe ; 2. The sake of peace which is already somewhat interrupted : 3. The rest and tranquillity of conscience, "which I cannot have here on account of difficulties in practice, which are lately come and surely increased, for which it seems no remedy can be obtained. These are the main motives. ' ni On the 16th day of June 1824, Father Nerinckx left Loretto and on July 2nd, 1824, he arrived at Bethlehem near St. Mary's Seminary. Perry County, Missouri. "The Sisters were not expecting him," says Sister Eulalia, "he stepped into the hall and thus took them by surprise." Going to the chapel he gave benediction of the Blessed Sacrament and then departed for the Seminary, where he remained a few weeks. On the 26th of July, he left the Barrens, said Mass for the last time in the Sister's chapel at Bethlehem, and then rode away to St. Louis. From St. Louis he made a visit to his friends, the Jesuit Fathers at Florissant ; thence he returned to St. Louis, made arrangements with the Indian agent in regard to sending twelve Indian girls to Bethlehem. On the 2nd of August he set out for Bethlehem convent, full of glad anticipations in regard to his Indian venture. On his way, however, he stopped at a little village, 1 "' where he preached, heard confessions, and said Mass, and even started a building fund for a new church. But the exertions undergone by the noble priest brought on a fever. In company of Mr. James Van Ryssel- berge, Father Nerinckx set out for Ste. Genevieve, where he was received with great kindness by the Pastor, Father Dahmen, C. M. On Sunday, August 8th, Brother James assisted him into the chapel. Unable to say Mass, he would at least attend. On August 12th, 1824, at five o'clock in the evening Father Nerinckx expired in the 63rd year of his age. His remains were buried in the humble church-yard of Bethlehem. Bishop Rosati performed the last 14 Maes, op. cit., pp. 521 and 522. 15 French Village, also called Little Canada. Father Charles Neritickx and His Relations with St. Louis :>17 sacred rites. In December 1833, the remains of Father Nerinckx were translated to Loretto and reinterred in the Sisters' Cemetery, where a beautiful monument was erected over his tomb. A most beautiful and touching tribute to the memory of the Apostle of Kentucky was rendered by Bishop Flaget, and published in the Ignited States Catholic Miscellany, Wednesday, December 8th, 1824. One hundred years have elapsed since Father Charles Nerinckx passed to his eternal reward. But, as Bishop Flaget wrote, "he still lives amongst us in his works," and the Archdiocese of St. Louis may well be proud of its early intimate relations to the saintly Founder of the Friends of Mary at the Foot of the Cross, and the resourceful pathfinder for the Jesuits to their earlier field of glory on the banks of the Miss- issippi River. Chapter 11 THE INDIAN MISSIONS AND THE JESUITS In answer to some of his friends in Europe who had gently disap- proved of his waste of time and energy, and money on foreign lands which might be more profitably spent on France itself, the Bishop of Louisiana pointed out the essential humanity of educating and chris- tianizing the Indians. "Turn then your eyes, "he wrote/' on hundreds of Indian tribes that seem but to wait for instruction in order to embrace the faith. How touched you would be if you could see the frequent deputations which I receive from them, the religious respect which they testify to me, and the urgent prayers which they address to me, to be their father, to visit them, and to give them men of God. In the midst of the great sadness which the view of so many of my neglected children causes me, I am beginning to experience the consolation of seeing the seed of the word bear fruit." 1 Father Eugene Michaud, who came to the American Mission with Odin, J. B. Blanc, Audizio, Peyretti and Caretta in 1822, and was raised to the priesthood by Bishop Du Bourg on September 22nd, of the same year, "a pious and learned young man, with an excellent character, and, above all, very good judgment," wrote a few letters for the Annals of the Society for the Propagation of the Faith, concerning the Louisi- ana missions. We cull from his account the following passages in regard to the early missionary activities among the Indians of the Western Plains. "In 1820, a number of chiefs of the Osage nation came to St. Louis by the order of the Indian agent. 2 Sans-Nerf (principal chief of this nation) was at their head. They all visited our Bishop, whom they call the 'Chief of the Black Robes'. As they have a high opinion of him, and as respect for priests seems natural to them, since they know by tradition that 'Black Robes' visited their forefathers, they came in full dress. Their copper-colored bodies were coated with grease, their faces and arms were striped in different colors, white lead, Vermillion, ver- digris and other colors formed a great variety of furrows, all starting 1 Du Bourg to a Friend in Europe about 1818, in "Annales de la Propagation de la Foi," vol. I, p. 20. 2 William Clark, one of the leaders of the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804- 1806. The Osage Indians had been on friendly terms with the Jesuit Fathers of Kaskaskia under the French Eegime. (318) The Indian Missions and the Jesuits 319 at the nose. Their hair was arranged in tufts. Bracelets, ear-rings, rings in their noses and lips completed their head-dress. Their shoes are made of buckskin which they ornament with different designs in feathers of various colors; hanging from their robes are little pieces of tin, shaped like small pipes. These are to them the most beautiful ornaments. Their great object is to make a noise when they walk or dance. Their heads are ornamented with a sort of crown in which are mixed up birds' heads, bears' claws and little stag's horns. A woolen robe hung over the shoul- ders, covers nearly all the rest of the body ; and again, to this robe are fastened the tails of different animals, etc. Such is the attire in which the chiefs of the Osages paid their respects to the Bishop of Louisiana. He has in his room a handsome ivory crucifix, a small picture of St. Thomas, and a few other paintings. The sight of the crucifix struck them with astonishment. They gazed at it, their expression wondering and softened. The Bishop profited by this occasion to announce to them Jesus Christ. 'Behold' (said he to them through the interpreter who accompanied them), 'behold the Son of the Master of Life, who came down from heaven to earth, who died for us as much for the redskins as for the white skins. It was to gain our happiness that Ho suffered so much and that He shed all His blood. It is He,' added the Bishop, 'who has sent me here to make known to you His will. ' "It is impossible, the Bishop said, to describe the attention that all these poor savages paid to him, and the emotion which they experienced when the interpreter repeated to them the words of the Bishop. They raised their eyes and their hands to heaven and then to the crucifix. All the spectators were moved by the scene. Before taking leave of the Bishop, Sans-Nerf said to him through the interpreter, that if he wished to come and visit them in their homes he would be well received ; that he could do a great deal of good, and that he could pour waters on many heads. The Bishop promised to do so, and presented each one with a little crucifix and also a medal which he hung around their necks by a ribbon, admonishing them to guard them carefully. They promised him to do so, and have kept their word." 3 Bishop Du Bourg, enthusiastic as he was, and of a romantic turn of mind, at once decided to assist the Osages himself, and De Andreis was to accompany him. But De Andreis died, and Bishop Du Bourg had so many calls on his time and talent, and cherished as many grand dreams, that he soon decided to entrust the Osage Mission to one of his most excellent priests, Father Charles de La Croix. As the beginnings of a great undertaking, be they ever so humble, deserve to be remember- ed in all their details, we will give entire the second part of Father 3 ' ' Annales de la Propagation, ' ' vol. I, pp. 53 and 54. 320 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis ftlichaud's letter, which treats more fully of the events thai transpired in the first Osage Mission : "In 1821 Father La Croix set out to open the mission to these savages. On the occasion of his first visit, as they were about to depart on a hunt- ing expedition, he could only see one village. He was very well received and baptized a great many children. As he had promised to visit all the villages of the nation of Indians, he was obliged to return last summer. He left Florissant, which is situated five leagues from St. Louis, on the 22nd of July. After traveling tw T elve days on horseback across prairies, broken by forests and streams, he reached the first village which he had already visited in the spring. They were delighted to see him again. He was accompanied by several persons who intended to trade with the savages. All the warriors came to meet them. They were conducted, with great honor to the head chief and invited to feasts, prepared by the savages, and so were kept going until evening, from cabin to cabin. At these repasts they were presented with a wooden dish, filled with boiled maize or buffalo meat (boeuf sauvage), but each dish had to be duly tasted. The head chief and six of his principal warriors offered to accompany the missionary in his visit to the other villages. Ten days were passed thus, and the missionary was received everywhere with the same eager- ness. At one of these villages more than a hundred warriors, covered from head to foot with their handsomest ornaments, came quite a distance to meet him. They rode finely trained horses. The occupations of the men are war and hunting. The women are very hard working. They it is who build the cabins, and who carry loads of firewood on their backs. The quantity they take at one time is astonishing. The whole nation is clothed, decently at least. Everyone is covered with a robe. Polygamy is practiced among them, for it is the custom that, when a savage demands a girl in marriage and is accepted, not only she, but all her sisters also belong to him and are looked upon as his wives. They pride themselves greatly upon having several wives. Another great obstacle to their civilization lies in their strong distaste for the culti- vation of the soil and for all kinds of work. They care for nothing but war and hunting. One day the missionary celebrated the Holy Sacrifice. All the chiefs were present, and also as many savages as the place would hold. He has told me that he was greatly moved by the respectful attention which they showed, and the exactitude with which they rose and knelt, raising their arms and eyes to heaven. After Mass he distributed to all the chiefs a number of crosses, fastened to ribbons, which he threw around their necks. He also baptized several children. The Indian Missions and the Jesuits 32] The soil of this portion of Missouri is very fertile, and there are prairies six or seven Leagues in extent. In summer the heat is excessive. It was during this journey that the missionary was attacked by burning fever, which forced him to leave the Osages. He was obliged to travel, twelve days on horseback, sleeping at night in the woods, not coming across a single miserable cabin. This is how they go about arranging their camp. Having chosen the most suitable place, they unload and unharness the horses, which they let run loose in the woods that they may pasture during the night. They build a hut with the branches of trees, and having gathered wood they light a big fire. Over this they boil a piece of young buck placed on a stick planted before the fire, (he meat being turned from time to time. This fire serves also to drive away bears and other wild beasts. After their repast, they roll them- selves up in a buffalo skin and fatigue renders this poor bed very comfortable." 4 As Father Michaud intimates, the chief obstacles to the conversion of the Indians, were, next to the wandering instinct and lazy life of the Indian himself, the trader with his fire water, and the salaried preacher with his calumnies and impositions. "For several years Protestant missionaries, sent out and well paid by the American government, had been settled among these savages, and had built up establishments where they cared for the children of this nation for a certain time. But they were not successful, and nearly a year ago the Indians took away all their children, saying that they had realized that they were not Black- robes, as they had thought they were at first. ' ' 5 Black-robes, that is Catholic priests, these poor people wanted. "Their affection for the Black-robes is touching, especially for the French priests," writes Father Michaud 's companion on the voyage to America, John Marie Odin, then in deacon's order. "Some time ago, a great number of savages were in St. Louis. One of them was taken on some errand to a house where the Bishop happened to be. The moment he perceived the Bishop, he ran to him, seized his hand and kissed it with every demonstration of friendship. Having departed without remember- ing to go through the same ceremony, he recalled his mistake, only when already at some distance from the house. He turned back immediately. * Annales, vol. I, pp. 57 and 58. Father Garraghan's "Saint Ferdinand de Florissant" contains a chapter, the seventh, on Father Charles De La Croix. Mon- signor Holweck in the "Pastoral-Blatt, " July, 1919, gives a well-authenticated sketch. Bishop Du Bourg was won't to call this noble priest his "angel." Mother Du Chesne admired him for his angelic piety and absolute fearlessness. 5 Annales, vol. I, p. 58. Records, vol. XIV. Vol. I 11 322 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis running all the way, and uttering loud cries, kissed the Bishop's hand and departed once more." The Administration of President James Monroe, was hailed as the "era of good feeling." All danger of foreign interference seemed to have been eliminated by the so-called Monroe Doctrine, and the govern- ment could now apply all its energies to internal affairs. The Indian population demanded special attention. The Indian wars, though confined to the frontier, had been very costly in blood and treasure. Education was proclaimed as the panacea for all evils. The Indians were to share in its blessings. The President and John C. Calhoun, the Secretary of War, expressed their willingness to aid in a substantial manner those who would undertake the task of civilizing and christianizing the In- dians. "Upon the whole" as Von Hoist says, "he (Calhoun) advocated a policy towards these wards of the nation which it would have been well for all parties concerned to adopt and pursue with undeviating honesty. Even in our days his Indian reports might be profitably studied with regard as well to the cardinal mistakes committed in the Indian policy as to what ought to be done. ' ' 7 Congress had set apart the sum of $10,000.00 for the purpose of aiding the schools that were then and might be established for the in- struction of young Indians. Secretary Calhoun, into whose hands the distribution of the fund was laid, announced that "Government will, if it has the means, and approves the arrangement, pay two-thirds of the expense of erecting the necessary buildings. The President of the United States will contribute out of the annual appropriation to each institution which may be approved by him, a sum proportionate to the number of pupils belonging to each, regard being had to the necessary expense of the establishment and the degree of success which has at- tended it. ' ' But it will be indispensable, in order to apply any portion of the sum appropriated in the manner proposed, that the plan of education, in addition to reading, writing and arithmetic, should in the instruction of boys, extend to the practical knowledge of the mode of agriculture, and of such of the mechanic arts as are suited to the condition of the Indians; and in that of the girls, to spinning, weaving and sewing. It is also indispensable that the establishment should be fixed within the limits of those Indian nations who border on our settlements*, " 8 6 Annales, vol. I, p. 52. Becords, vol. XIV, p. 181. 7 Von Hoist, John C. Calhoun in ' ' American Statesmen Series, ' ' p. 45. 8 Calhoun's Circular, Feb. 29, 1820, supplementary to that of September 3, 1819, both published in "American Catholic Historical Eesearches, " vol. X, pp. 154- 159. The Indian Missions and the Jesuits 323 In the additional regulations issued by Secretary Calhoun, it was stated that regard would be had, not only to the number of pupils of each institution, but also to the necessary expense incurred and the degree of success attained. Bishop Du Bourg saw his opportunity. In a letter to the Secretary, under date of February 15th, 1823, he developed his plan of civilizing the Indians of Missouri: "The work of civilization should commence with harmonizing them by the kind doctrine of Christianity, instilled into their minds, not by the doubtful and tedious process of books, but by familiar conversation, striking representations, and by the pious lives of their spiritual leaders. "Men, disenthralled from all family cares, abstracted from every earthly enjoyment, inured to fatigue and self-denial . . . are well calcu- lated to strike* the child of nature as a supernatural species of beings, entitled to almost implicit belief. Thus their unremitting charity will easily subdue the ferocity of their hearts, and by degrees, assimilate their inclinations to those of their fellow-christians. "I would be for aban- doning the whole management of that great work to the prudence of missionaries as the best judges of the means to be progressively employed to forward the great object of their own sacrifices. Such at least was always the policy observed in Catholic Indian missions, the success of which in almost every instance answered and often surpassed every prudent expectation. Upon these principles I would be willing to send a few missionaries, by way of trial at least, among the Indians of Missouri, should Govern- ment be disposed to encourage the undertaking. The Appropriation of monies for the object, being, I understand, very limited and in a great measure already disposed of, I feel extremely delicate in proffering any specific demand. I would only beg to observe, that hardly a less sum than 200 dollars would suffice to procure a missioner the indispensible ne- cessities of life. With this abridged view of the subject, I beg you will have the goodness to inform me, Sir, whether and to what extent, Govern- ment would be willing to favor my scheme : 1. What allowance it would grant to each missionary ? 2. To how many that support might be extended ? 3. In case establishments could be made, what help would be made towards them either in money or land ? ' ' 9 The President and Secretary Calhoun gave their hearty approval, saying that the Government would contribute $200.00 annually towards the support of the missionaries to be sent out. But, for the present only three were to be sent. The Government would also contribute towards the expense of the buildings for the accommodation of the missionaries. 9 Du Bourg to Calhoun, February 15, 1823. Original letter in "Indian Office Records. ' ' ■'!_-] History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis Further encouragement would be extended in accordance with the results attained. Cheered by this initial success with the Government the Bishop asked and obtained the pledge that four instead of three missionaries would receive the annual allowance of $200.00. From the Bishop's letter it appears that these missionaries were intended for the tribes on the Upper Missouri, and Mississippi, Council Bluffs, Prairie du Chien and Riviere St. Pierre. William Clark, the Indian Agent at St. Louis, was instructed by Calhoun, to befriend the missionaries in their endeavors. "It is believed," says the Secretary to General Clark, "that the missionaries will, besides preparing the way for their ultimate civiliza- tion be useful in preserving peace with the tribes among which they may fix themselves." 10 So far not a word had been spoken in regard to schools for the Indian children. The plan had in view the erection of Indian missions among the remote tribes, and an allowance of $200.00 for each of the four missionaries. Bishop Du Bourg now conceived the idea of a school for the training of missionaries. Writing to Secretary Calhoun on March 17th, 1823, he says: "I have the honor to submit to your con- sideration a plan of operation, which the most serious reflections have presented to me as best calculated to insure permanency to that estab- lishment and to enlarge its sphere of usefulness. "The basis of that plan would be the formation (on an eligible spot near the confluence of those two large streams) of a Seminary or nursery of Missionaries, in which young candidates for that holy function would be trained in all its duties; whilst it would also afford a suitable re- treat for such as, through old age, infirmity or any other lawful cause, would be compelled to withdraw from that arduous ministry. — The chief studies pursued in that Seminary would be : the manners of the Indians, the idiom of the principal Nations, and the arts best adapted to the great purpose of civilization. — And, in order to facilitate the attainment of some of these objects, I would at once try to collect in that Institution some Indian youths of the most important tribes, whose habitual converse with the tyros of the Mission, would be mutually of the greatest advantage for the promotion of the ultimate object in con- templation. — The result of that kind of Novitiate would be a noble emulation among the Missionaries, uniformity of system, a constant succession of able and regularly trained Instructors, and a gradual expansion of their sphere of activity. "I am willing to give for that establishment a fine and well-stocked farm in the rich valley of Florissant about one mile from the river Missouri and fifteen from St. Louis. io Calhoun to Clark, "Indian Office Records," Washington, D. C. The Indian Missions and the Jesuits 325 Seven young clergymen, from twenty-two to twenty-seven years of age, of solid parts and an excellent Classical education are nearly ready to set off at the first signal under the guidance of two Superiors and professors and with an escort of a few faithful mechanics and husband- men to commence the foundation. I calculate at about two years the time necessary to consolidate it and to fit out most of those highly promising candidates for the duties of the missions, after which they will be anxious to be sent in different directions according to the views and under the auspices of government, whilst they will be replaced in the Seminary by others destined to continue the noble enterprise. "So forcibly am I struck with the happy consequences likely to re- sult from the extension of that same project that I hesitate not to believe that Government, viewing it in the same light with myself, will be disposed to offer me towards its completion that generous aid with- out Avhieh I would not be warranted to undertake it "It has already condescended to allow $800 per annum for four missionaries. But it was on the supposition that they would be im- mediately sent to the Missouri, whilst in the proposed plan the opening of the missions would take place but two years after the opening of the Seminary. Yet though not actually employed among the tribes, the missionaries, whilst yet in their novitiate, would not be less profitably engaged in the cause; since besides having a number of young Indians to feed, to educate and maintain, they would be laying the foundation for far more extended usefulness for the future The true object of this memoir is to demand that the allowance granted by government, to be increased, if possible, to $1000 per annum (on account of the great additional expenses incident on the present scheme) should be paid from the first outset, on my pledging myself as I solemnly do, that, at latest, in two years from the commencement, I will send out five or six missionaries and successively as many more as Government may then be disposed to encourage. For the attainment of the object of collecting some Indian boys in the Seminary, it would be of great service, Sir, that you should please to invite General Clarke and Colonel O 'Fallon to lend me their assis- tance." 11 This letter bears date of March 17, 1823. To this communication of Bishop Du Bourg, Secretary Calhoun replied on March 21 : "I have received your letter of the 17th instant and submitted it to the President, (Monroe) for his consideration and direction, who has instructed me to inform you. in reply, that believing the establish- ment of a school on the principles which you have suggested, is much better calculated to effect your benevolent design of extending the 11 Du Bourg to Calhoun, "Indian Office Records." 326 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis benefits of civilization to the remote tribes, and with it the just influ- ence of the government, than the plan you formerly proposed for the same object, he is willing to encourage it as far as he can with propriety, and will allow you at the former rate of $800 per annum to be paid quarter-yearly towards the support of the completed establishment. No advance, however, can be made consistently with the regulations, until the establishment has actually commenced its operations with a suitable number of Indian youths ; of which fact and the number of pupils the certificate of General Clark will be the proper evidence. "A copy of this letter will be sent to General Clark with instructions to give proper orders to such of the Indian agents under his charge, as you may think necessary, to facilitate the collection of the Indian youths to be educated, and to afford every aid in his power to promote the success of the establishment." 12 These arrangements, though not perfectly satisfactory to the Bishop, were accepted as the basis for further action. Bishop Du Bourg himself writes on this subject to his brother in Bordeaux, March 17, 1823 : "Providence deigns to grant a success to this negotion, far in excess of my hopes. The government bestows upon me two hundred dollars a year for each missionary and that for four or five men, and it promises to increase the number gradually, and I am sure that it will do so. For an enterprise such as this, it was essential that I should have men especially called to this work, and I had almost renounced the hope of ever obtaining such, when God, in His infinite goodness, has brought about one of those incidents which He alone can foresee and direct the results." 13 12 Calhoun to Du Bourg, "Indian Office Records." 13 Annales, vol. I, p. 5. Records, vol. XIV, p. 156. Chapter 12 THE INDIAN MISSIONS AND THE JESUITS II The incident related in the foregoing chapter was the providential answer to Bishop's long and anxious meditations summed up in the following passage of a letter to his brother in Bordeaux: "I have long been convinced that nothing could be accomplished here without the Religious Orders. A man living isolated from his kind grows weary of the apparent uselessness, of his efforts. The intense heat exhausts his strength and checks his ardor. Too often he loses his life or, in the fear of losing it, he abandons his post. He is fortunate indeed, if he does not prove the truth of those words of the Holy Ghost : "Woe to him who is alone!" and from a being, full of vigor and activity he becomes a good-for-nothing, and the scorn of his fellowmen. There in not the same danger for the religious community. Union makes strength of all kinds. Their members are constantly renewed and in- creased, hence they are able to provide for their own losses. It is to this end that I have worked from the very beginning, to secure the help of the Order of Saint Vincent de Paul, and that I have made every effort to induce the Jesuits to come here, the former Order for the seminary, the latter for the Missouri missions, and more es- pecially, for work among the Indians. The expense of all this has been great, but I am far from regretting it." 1 As early as February 24th, 1821, Bishop Du Bourg had written to the Prefect of the Propaganda, Cardinal Fontana, asking His assistance in gaining the Jesuits for the work of converting the Indians, who, as he states, are very numerous in the upper part of his diocese. The Holy Father, himself wrote to the Superior General with a view to en- dorse his wishes. But up to that date all efforts had proved unavailing. "However," concluded Bishop Du Bourg, "I understand that the Superiors of the Society are now showing more willingness to undertake the work. I have accordingly recommened to Father Inglesi 2 to make use of every resource his intelligence and zeal could muster, in order to bring this project to maturity. I beg likewise Your Eminence to second his efforts. There is particularly one of the Fathers of the Society, De Barat by name, now in the Little Seminary of Bordeaux, i "Annates de la Propagation de la Foi, " vol. II, p. 394. "Kecords of the American Catholic Historical Society, ' ' vol. XIV, p. 160. 2 Father Angelo Inglesi, Bishop Du Bourg 's protege, Vicar-General and proposed Coadjutor. (327) 328 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis whom I know to be most anxious to conic here; his piety, knowledge and zeal arc beyond par. I beg most earnestly the Vicar General to give him to me, and beseech to this end the aid of Your Eminence's most powerful influence. With him some of the younger French Jesuits will be glad to come, and also others, of riper years, from among those who came lately from Russia to Prance. Five or six at most, would be sufficient, if to them were added two or three from Maryland — a thing most desirable, on account of their knowledge of English, and also be- cause, as they are well provided financially, they could supply the want of their brothers. With this help, the Gospel cannot fail to make head- way among the numberless nations on both sides of the Mississippi and the Missouri.'' 3 Bishop Du Bourg petitioned Father Aloysius Fort is, the General of the Jesuits at Rome, for some members of the Society to be established in Louisiana, and received a courteous refusal ; but as he himself de- clares, he seemed to hear out of the refusal the voice of God repeating, "Et si perseveraberis pulsans, propter improbitatem dabunt." Lucas VII.,4. All applications so far had failed to attain the purpose. But nil desperandum, thought Bishop Du Bourg. And really, as, the poet of the Seasons tells us, "What makes the hero truly great, is never, never, to despair." The Bishop's persistent efforts in this regard were at last to be crow T ned with perfect success, though not in the manner he had expected. There was at Whitemarsh near Baltimore a Novitiate of the Jesuits whom Father Nerinckx had brought from Belgium in 1821. Their Master of Novices was Father Charles Felix Van Quiekenborne, a native of Ghent. Born January 21st, 1788, the energetic young man, after being raised to priesthood, and acting as Vicar of a parish in Ghent and as Professor at the Seminary of Rottanen, was admitted into the Novitiate of the Jesuits at Roulers. During this time he had as pupil Ferdinand Helias de Huddeghem. It was the good Father's love and sympathy for the benighted Indians that inspired the desire of going to America, in teacher as well as in pupil. The young missionary Charles Van Quiekenborne obtained permission to go, and arrived in Georgetown at the end of 1817. The student Helias was obliged to wait a few years. Father Van Quiekenborne was appointed Master of Novices within four years after his ordination. The novices were making excellent progress under their kind and sympathetic master: but a dark cloud had arisen over the institution threatening disaster to all . Owing to 3 Archives of Propaganda, Scritture Referite, Cod. 7, America Centrale, pub- lished by Dr. Souvay in "Documents from Our Archives." "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. II, p. 136. The I)i O p w 1-5 S3 Chapter 13 THE JESUIT BEGINNINGS AT ST. FERDINAND Father Van Quickenborne with his little Jesuit community of one priest and six novices were now ready to take possession of what was called the Bishop's Farm, a tract of land of about 212 acres in the Common Field of St. Ferdinand, which according to the Concordat was to be the Jesuit Fathers' property. But Bishop Du Bourg had leased the place for ten years to a Mr. O'Neil, who demanded the payment of 400 dollars, ere he would give peaceable, possession to Father Van Quick- enborne. An amicable settlement of the unpleasant matter was finally arranged, and the community set to work to make the buildings on the farms inhabitable. How poor and devoid of all comfort these cabins were appears from a description made by Father Walter Hill who saw them in 1847. "The dwelling given up to them by Mr. O'Neil was a log cabin containing one room, which was sixteen by eighteen feet, in dimensions ; and over it was a loft, but not high enough for a man to stand erect in it, except when directly under the comb of the roof. This poorly lighted and ventilated loft, or garret was made the dormitory of the seven novices, their beds consisting of pallets spread upon the floor. Tbe room below was divided into two by a curtain, one part being used as a chapel and the other serving as bedroom for Fathers Van Quickenborne and Timmermans. This main room of the cabin had a door on the south-east or front ; a large window on the north-west side ; without sash or glass but closed with a heavy board shutter ; on the south-west side was a notable chimney with a fire-place having a capacity for logs of eight feet in length. At a distance of about eighty feet to the north- east of the building were two smaller cabins, some eight feet apart, one of which was made to serve as a study hall for the novices, and as a common dining-room for the community ; the other was used as a kitchen and for lodging the negroes. These rude structures were covered with rough boards, held in place by weight poles ; the floors were ' puncheons, ' and the doors were riven slabs, and their wooden latches were lifted with strings hanging outside." 1 But nothing daunted, the Superior added a second story to the main building, and surrounded the house with a gallery. In making excavations for a wing to the structure, the scholastics, Van Assche, De Smet, Ver- haegen and Verreidt, were each assigned a quarter section of the proposed cellar. The timber was procured from an island in the Missouri river. Hill, Walter H., S. J., "Historical Sketch of St. Louis University," p. 282 (335) 336 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis The work of cutting and handling the logs was done by the novices and the negro slaves. De Smet is reported to have been the champion with the axe, whilst Van Assche excelled all others with the spade and mattock. Father De Smet left us an interesting record of these exhilarating ex- periences. "Every day after breakfast the Rector led his little band with cross-cut saw, and each one with an axe in his hand, to an island in the Missouri River, three miles distant, containing about a thousand acres of forest trees of all sizes. They were free to all comers, so that we had our choice of chopping and felling. Hundreds of logs were secured and safely landed ashore and hauled to St. Stanislaus. These logs were intended for the construction of two large cabins of hewn timbers, for rafters, servant cabins, stables and barns. This immense forest island, which was just above the Charboniere, shortly after disappeared in a great rise and freshet of the Missouri River, not leaving a vestige of tree or soil. It stood on a flat, naked bed of lime stone rock, on which it had been forming perhaps for centuries, as some of the largest trees seemed to indicate." 2 Father Van Quickenborne wrote: "Our house will be comfortable and spacious enough to lodge two or three fathers more. The Novices agreed on all this and did the work willingly and joyfully." Funds were, however, growing less, and there was no source from which they could be replenished. Bishop Du Bourg, indeed, had pledged himself to sup- port, encourage and promote the Jesuit Missions and foundations to the best of his ability and with such pecuniary aid, collections, and donations, as his circumstances and means would allow." He also recognized his duty "to try to procure for them, at least, the necessaries of life, and also the means of exercising their zeal and extending their field of labor. "It is in this," he said, "that I hope to be seconded by the As- sociation of the Propagation of the Faith." 3 In the meantime the six novices, Peter Verhaegen, John Baptist Smedts, John Felix Verreidt, Jodocus Van-Assche, Peter John De Smet and John Elet were permitted to pronounce the three simple vows that made them members of the Society of Jesus. The first winter at St. Ferdinand was noted for its severity. The building operations had to be suspended, although all the material was on hand. Another winter in the old lodgings might have been disastrous. Work was resumed in the Spring and the house was furnished in the summer of 1824. 2 Garraghan, S. J., "History of the Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus," in MS. 3 Du Bourg to his Brother, August 6, 1823. " Annales de la Propagation de la Foi," vol. I, 5, pp. 41 and 42. Tin .1 '( suit Beginnings at St. Ferdinand 337 But troubles were multiplying for the good Superior of the Jesuit Novitiate : his ouly assistant, Father Peter Timmermans, died unex- pectedly. He had been in feeble health for some time ; yet he continued his missionary work without complaint. On Sunday. May 30, he held usual services at St. Charles, but was unable to preach. Returning to the Novitiate, he retired for the night, hoping that he would be well in the morning. Father Van Quickenborne left the house for St. Louis, having been assured that Father Timmerman's ailment was not of a serious nature. In the afternoon, however, the patient grew worse and shortly afterwards died. Father Timmermans was buried on the following Tuesday in the parish Church of St. Ferdinand. ' ' He died like a soldier, with armor in hand on the field of battle, in the actual exercise of his truly apostolic zeal. His death has produced the effect which is ordinarily produced by the death of a saint." 4 was the final judgment pronounced on Father Timmermans by his brother in arms, Father Van Quickenborne. But the loss must be repaired, or the foundation is doomed, thought the Superior, and immediately requested that Father Dubuisson be sent to St. Ferdinand. "It is a dreadful thought, in moments of depression, to think oneself abandoned. Our difficulties must needs increase with the arrival of the Indians. Those that we have are quite sick. If we are to have with the Indians the success we look for, it is imperative that some Father be sent to us : and would to God that he may come as Super- ior. I ask your Reverence to send lis Father Dubuisson.""' Again and again. Father Van Quickenborne 's cry for help went out to his Superior in Maryland, but no help came. "This is alarming.*' he wrote, "I hope that Father Dubuisson with Brother Meade, have by this time started." But the year drew to a close, and the petition for help, still remained unanswered. Father Van Quickenborne had to tread the wine-press alone. Yet an unexpected recognition of his worth came to him in his distress. Father Rosati, who had now become Coadjutor Bishop, in December of the same year appointed Father Van Quickenborne his Vicar General for Upper Louisiana. Bishop Du Bourg also interceded with the Jesuit Superior in Maryland for the "infant establishment" in Missouri. All the Catholic population of Missouri west of St. Louis was in the care of Father Van Quickenborne. In order to fulfill his obligation at least in some measure, he said mass every Sunday at the village church of St. Ferdinand, whither all the inmates of the Novitiate repaired for the occasion. 4 Van Quickenborne to his Maryland Superior, Father Dziorizynski, Juno :->, 1824, in "Archives of Georgetown," furnished me by Father Garraghan. 5 Van Quickenborne to Dziorizynski, ibidem. 6 Idem, ibidem. 338 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis St. Charles and Portage des Sioux were visited once a month, on some week-day. The scholastics Elet and Verhaegen visited St. Charles, holding prayer-service and giving catechetical instructions. Two other scholastics attended Florissant in a similar manner. In April 1825 the Father Superior spent a full week in visiting the outlying western sta- tions, Hancock Prairie, Cote-sans-dessein and Franklin. Bishop Du Bourg cautioned the zealous missionary against over- working himself, and suggested to him the advisability of having two of the scholastics raised to the priesthood. Father Van Quiekenborne was not averse to the Bishop's suggestion and submitted the names of Smedts and Verreidt. They would be ready for ordination in September 1825. Yet circumstances necessitated a delay of almost a year. Father Van Quiekenborne was attacked by a malignant fever and for a time ex- pected to die. Gradually sinking under the strain, he wrote to Father Dzierozynski, his Superior in Maryland, to send him help. The Novitiate now lacking novices, had become a Scholasticate, a house of Studies, and the Kector appointed two of the scholastics, Elet and Verhaegen, Profess- ors of Dogmatic Theology and of Sacred Scripture. Father Van Quicken- borne took the class of Moral Theology, which, however, he was soon forced to relinquish in favor of his many other spiritual and temporal concerns. Sometimes the scholastics were left without Mass for a week at a time. The Professor of Dogma, M. Elet, wrote to Father Dzierozynski : "Would that you could send us," so young Elet expressed himself, "Father De Theux, a man remarkable alike for piety and learning. Then we would forget the past and make light of the discomforts created here by an oppressive climate, incessant rains and unfinished house. We should gladly take upon ourselves the work of the house and even spend our recreation days outdoors in manual labor." 7 What neither Bishop nor Superior could accomplish, was quickly attained by Elet, the Scholastic : Father De Theux was appointed to the vacancy left by Father Timmerman's death. John Theodore Mary -Joseph De Theux was born at Liege, on January 25, 1789. He was of noble extraction, his father being the Count De Theux. Being the eldest son and heir of the house, the young John Theodore resigned his rights in favor of his brother Bartholomew, and followed the divine call into the priesthood. He was ordained at Namur on the Feast of St. Aloysiusl812, and became Vicar of St. Nicholas at Liege. The hospitals of the city were crowded with sick Spanish prisoners. Father De Theux went in to them to bring spiritual help and consolation and thus contracted the pesti- lence. Nursed back to health under the roof of his parents, he was ap- pointed Administrator of the diocese of Liege, whilst teaching Dogmatic Theology in the Seminary. 7 Elet to Dziorizynski, December 31, 1825, ibidem. The Jesuit Beginnings at St. Ferdinanel 339 The tireless servant of God, Father Nerinckx, met Father De Theux and won him over to the American Missions. In March 1816 he was on his way overseas with Father Leken. Both sought and obtained admission into the Jesuit Mission of Maryland. After a novitiate of two years Father De Theux was admitted to the first vows, and now, after six years of parochial work in Georgetown, he was sent to the Far West, with Brother O'Connor as companion. On the way he learnt of the death of his father, the old Count De Theux. On his arrival in St. Ferdinand in August 1825, he took up the duties as Professor of Dogmatic Theology. 8 Father Van Quickenborne began to realize that a visit of the Mary- land Superior to the House of Studies at St. Ferdinand would quickly solve many of the difficulties in his way. An invitation with the closing words: "your Reverence does not know Missouri,'' brought the desired visit. Father Dzierozynski reached St. Ferdinand on July 18, 1827. Affable and kind as he was, he entered into the far-reaching plans of Father Van Quickenborne with a lively interest. No doubt a number of important questions in regard to a school of higher education in St. Louis, were discussed between the two representatives of the Order. Certainly, there was a better understanding shown after this visit by the Maryland authorities, of the needs of the Missouri Mission. On January 29, 1826 Smedts and Verhaegen had been ordained at St. Mary's of the Barrens, by Bishop Rosati. And on September 23, 1827, at Florissant, the four remaining Jesuit scholastics, John Felix Livinus Verreidt, Jodocus Francis Van Assche, Peter John De Smet and John Anthony Elet were added to the ranks of the prieshood by the Bishop of St. Louis. Father Van Quickenborne was now greatly re- lieved of care and work. Yet, there were many difficulties confronting him. The farm called for a number of necessary improvements to put it on a paying basis. And the Indian School at St. Ferdinand, opened on May 11, 1824, according to the Concordat, was becoming a serious problem owing to the Government's broken faith. But the spiritual interests of his community were uppermost in the mind of the Superior. After the Christmas holidays the eight Jesuits entered upon what is called the Tertianship, under the direction of Father Van Quickenborne. "On the 9th of last January" wrote Father De Theux to his widowed mother, "I began with my six pupils the third year of probation." After the close of the retreat, February 7, 1828, the Fathers were as- signed to various duties : John Elet to the Salt River District in North- eastern Missouri, Verhaegen to St. Charles and Smedt to Portage des Sioux; De Theux was assigned to parochial duties at Florissant; De Smet gave a Retreat to the Sisters of the Sacred Heart, and Van Assche to the lay-brothers at the Jesuit Home; the Superior undertook a second missionary journey to the Osage Indians. 8 Father De Smet incorporated a sketch of Father De Theux in his book, "Western Missions and Missionaries," pp. 474-486. Also of Elet and Smedts. Chapter 14 THE FIRST INDIAN SCHOOL IN MISSOURI It was mainly for the purpose of establishing Indian Missions in his vast diocese of Louisana, that Bishop Du Bourg had been so insistent on getting a colony of Jesuits. "Pending the ordination of our Jesuit novices and their going forth as apostles," the Bishop wrote from Georgetown to his brother Louis, March 17, 1823, "I propose to receive into the Seminary a half dozen Indian children from different tribes, so as to begin to familiarize my young missionaries with their manners and languages and in turn to prepare the children to become guides, interpreters and helpers to the missionaries, when the time comes to send the latter forth to the scattered tribes." 1 Father Van Quickenborne was heart and soul in the work: The authorities in Maryland however counselled a prudent restraint, until the necessary means of success were assured. "On the subject of the education of the young Indians of whom you speak," wrote Father Benedict Fenwick, "the Superior requires thai you act with the utmost prudence and circumspection in that affair and that you keep yourself altogether within the Concordat. He wishes you to undertake no more than what is specified therein and what the Society has engaged itself to perform. He has no wish to enlarge the sphere of your operations until adequate means be procured, either from Government favoring such a design, or from the quarters of which he will give you due notice. "The Superior would have yon cultivate in a particular manner the good esteem of the Governor, and United States Agents, civil as well, as military, and whenever they speak to you of the education of the Indian youth to assure them of your willingness to undertake the same ; but at the same time to let them know that such a thing will be quite impracticable without the aid of Government .... In the meantime let the engagement, as far as it goes, which the Society has entered into, be fully and completely executed, No one can blame you for not doing, what the Society has never engaged to do. You have, I presume, a copy of that contract. Let that be your polestar. "- The Government's promise of a subsidy, however, depended on the previous establishment of the School. Nothing remained to Father Van Quickenborne, but to proceed with the matter in the hope that i "Annales de la Propagation de la Foi, " vol. I, 5, p. 37; Records, vol. XIV, p. 152. 2 Fenwick to Quickenborne, September 10, 1823, printed in Garraghan, "St. Begis Seminary" in "Catholic Historical Review, " vol. IV, p. 458. (340) The First Indian School in Missouri 341 Government would eventually meet its obligations. General William Clark, the Indian Superintendent, offered to place six boys of the Iowa tribe in the School. Two others of the Sauk Indians had already been promised. Father Van Quickenborne accepted them on the understood condition that the Government pay for their board and tuition. On June 11th, 1824, the pupils, in company with their parents, and Gabriel Vasquez, U. S. Agent for the Iowas, appeared at the Seminary. The institution was dedicated to St. Francis Regis. "The Indian youths" Father Van Quickenborne tells us, "did not submit without a protest to what must have seemed to them, accustomed as they were to the freedom of the forest, as nothing short of imprison- ment. They began to cry piteously as their parents prepared to depart, whereupon one of the scholastics took up a flute and began to play. The music had the effect of quieting the lads and making- them resigned, as far as outward indications went, to their new environment. But Vasquez, the agent, warned Father Van Quickenborne that a sharp eye would have to be kept on the boys, as flight was an easy trick for them. Accordingly, Mr. Smedts, the Prefect, rose at intervals during the first night of the Iowa's stay at the Seminary to see that his young- charges were all within bounds, while another scholastic was also as- signed to sentry duty. But somehow or other the watchers were out- witted. About one o'clock in the morning the Iowa made a clever escape. Their flight was soon detected, and immediately a party of two were on the track of the fugitives. These were nimble runners, for they Avere five miles from the Seminary, when their pursurers came up to them. They made no resistance to capture and returned, apparently quite content, though determined, no doubt, to repeat the adventure when opportunity offered, as Father Van Quickenborne intimates in his account of the incident." 3 The Indian school now being a reality, it devolved upon the Govern- ment to extend its friendly supporting hand. "The Seminary," Father Van Quickenborne wrote to Clark, "went into actual operation the eleventh of May ultimo with two boys of the (Sauk) nation; on the eleventh of June three more were received of the (Iowa) nation ; thus since that time I have had five boys. The build- ings are commodious and can contain from forty to sixty students. They are nearly complete and fifty-four feet long by seventeen wide one way and thirty-four feet by seventeen feet the other way; three stories high, the lowest of stone, the two others of logs, brick chimneys and galleries all around. They have cost $1500 and when completed will cost $2000. " 4 3 Van Quickenborne to Dziorizynski, June 12, 1824. "Catholic Historical Re- view, ' ' vol. IV, p. 460. 4 Quickenborne to Clark in "Records of Indian Office,'' "Catholic Historical Review," vol. IV, p. 461. 342 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis To Secretary Calhoun Van Quickenborne wrote: "The Seminary is built on a spot of land remarkable for its healthiness and which, on account of its being somewhat distant from the Indian tribes and its being sufficiently removed from town, is possessed of many advan- tages .... I have persons belonging to the Seminary well calculated to teach the boys the mechanical arts such as are suitable for their con- dition, as a carpenter, a blacksmith, etc., whose names I do not place on the report, because the boys are not thoroughly fit as yet to begin to learn a trade. I have the comfort to be able to give my entire appro- bation to their correct comportment and, from the sentiments they utter, I have strong hopes that they will become virtuous and industri- ous citizens warmly attached to the Government that has over them such beneficent designs. I have been prepared these six months past to receive a considerable number more than what I have at present. The number of boys would have amounted to a few more, had not some on account of sickness returned to their village, after having gone a part of the way." 5 These letters were written on November 21, 1824 : In January of the following year the answer came from the Bureau of Indian Affairs which had just been established at Washington, to the effect, that the Government could not pay more than one hundred dollars for each pupil, and as the School had but five Indian children, five hundred dollars was the amount apportioned to St. Regis Seminary. A remit- tance of five hundred dollars was accordingly made. There was no "breach of promise" here, as had been charged by Bishop Du Bourg; yet the amount was not in proportion to the importance and difficulty of the work undertaken by the Jesuits, at the request of that prelate. One point in the matter is memorable, as Father Garraghan states : "The five hundred dollars which Calhoun directed to be paid to Father Van Quickenborne at St. Louis was the first money ever appro- priated by the United States Government to a Catholic Indian School. As the number of boys at the St. Regis had increased beyond eight, the appropriation in its favor for the years 1825 and 1826 was $800. In 1827, however, the appropriation was cut down to $400, extra demands on the funds of the Indian Office, so it was alleged, making a larger allow- ance impossible, and it remained at this figure until 1830, when the pay- ments ceased altogether. The total amount of money paid by the Govern- ment to the Florissant School during its brief career of six or seven years was about $3100. The cost of maintenance had been a little in excess of $10,000. " 6 5 Quickenborne to Calhoun in ''Records of Indian Office,'' "Catholic Historical Review," vol. IV, p. 461. 6 Garraghan, "St. Regis Seminary," "Catholic Historical Review," IV, pp. 463 and 464. The First Indian School in Missouri 343 But the Government had promised Bishop Du Bourg to contribute towards the erection of buildings for the purpose of Indian education. This the Indian Bureau declined to do on the ground that "the building was not within the limits of those Indian nations, that border on our settlements." 7 Not discouraged by these evasions of a plain duty, Father Van Quickenborne enlarged the usefulness of his school for Indian boys by prevailing on Mother Duchesne to undertake the foundation of a similar school for girls. Mother Duchesne asked the saintly Mother Barat for her consent to this apostolic work, which was gladly given. "The board costs little," she explained to her; "lodging is already available and as for clothes, we shall beg them. We must omit nothing to further this interesting work, the object of so many desires, the very thing that has brought us here." Five weeks later, she wrote again: "I sometimes think that God has spoiled our first plans and our first undertaking, the boarding-school, I mean, in order to build up, little by little, the more fascinating work of the education of the savages. We must merit it by humiliations and other sufferings." 8 Mother Duchesne's holy ambition was quickly realized: "One evening during Office," Madam Mathevon records in her Journal, "Father Rector called at the convent and asked to see the Superior. Picture the surprise of Madam Duchesne on seeing two little Indian girls before her, who, greatly embarrassed, were trying to hide themselves behind the Father's flowing mantle. He had brought them up in a cart." 9 Thus the Sisters of the Sacred Heart had another great care added to their former ones. Father Van Quickenborne gave aid whenever he could, corn and potatoes and firewood for a whole year. But should not the Government lend its aid to this new educational in- stitution ? Similar institutions of Protesant denominations were draw- ing regular allowances : why not the Catholic Sisterhood engaged in work for the wards of the Government ? They were ready and anxious to take forty or fifty Indian girls under their care. The underlying idea of Father Van Quickenborne is thus expressed in his letter to the Sec- retary of War: "Should Congress adopt the plan suggested by the late President of the United States and adhered to by the present President in his inaugural speech, the two establishments in this place would be able in a very short time to give a solid beginning to the adopted plan, by placing with the consent of Parents, those of the boys who would wish to marry girls educated in the female establishment, in a given district, with some assistance for husbandry, in which case I would offer to send i McKenney to Quickenborne, April 28, 1825, 1. c, 464. 8 Baunard-Fullerton, ' ' Mother Du Chesne, ' ' p. 264. 8 Baunard-Fullerton, ibidem. :!-!4 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis two of our Rev. Gentlemen to reside among them. These giving to their already known flock, filled with confidence in their Fathers, the aid which the Catholic religion affords, would be well calculated to maintain in them the spirit which they would have imbibed in the Seminaries, a spirit of the fear of the Lord, a spirit of regularity, industry and sub- ordination, a sincere attachment from principle and religion to out- most beneficient Government in their behalf. And in case several dis- tricts should be formed, from each of them a small and selected number might be sent to the establishment here, to be instructed more fully and fitted out for the important stations they might be called by the nation to fill." 10 Government aid failing him, at least, in the measure anticipated; Father Van Quickenborne addressed himself to the Catholics of Europe : "At Mackinac last summer the Presbyterians put up a school-house about a hundred feet in length. In this school they have re- ceived a large number of Indian children, whom they feed, clothe and instruct gratis. The Catholics of America are in general poor and unable to build churches for their own needs. . . It is then to the generosity of the Catholics of Europe that we must look for effective aid. The ministers of error are quick to profit by the ample means placed at their disposal by their rich merchants, who subscribe liberally for all their institutions. Moreover, as they were on the ground before us, they make off annually with nearly all of the ten thousand dollars which the President of the United States is authorized to spend on the civilization of the Indians. There is so far only one Catholic school for the instruction of Indian children, that namely at Florissant, near St. Louis ; this establishment receives a subsidy from the Govern- ment and this owing to the clever tact and engaging address of the Bishop of New Orleans, Mgr. Du Bourg. . . The Jesuits of France, England and Italy should come here and take possession of their old missions, the ruins of which cry out for them on all sides. . . What would I not do to make my voice heard all over Europe ! I would speak to it of the poor Indians in these terms: "Parvuli petierunt panem et non erat qui frangeret eis. " (the little ones ask for bread and there was no one to break it unto them.) " n The scholastic M. Smedts, the first prefect, was succeeded by M. Verreidt, who gives us a good account of the progress of his pupils, and the cares incumbent upon himself : "The boys rise in the morning during our meditation and 1 am with them till half-past eight o'clock when they go to the field and return 10 Van Quickenborne to Barbour, June 15, 1825, in "Records of the [ndii Office," communicated by Father Garraghan. 11 Annates, vol. Ill, p. 333. The First Indian School in Missov/ri 345 a quarter before twelve, at which time I am with them till two o'clock (after dinner) when they go again to the field till a quarter before five. At this time I used to teach some to spell till half-past six ; but since eight boys have left us so that we have at present but seven Indian ami three French boys, our Reverend Superior has allowed me to employ this time in the study of moral divinity, the study of which I resumed since last Easter. On Sundays and Holydays I have to be with them the whole day ; whenever it rains I have to be with them. They must be watched at night. I often sleep in the day in order to watch at night." 12 The greatest difficulty the instructors had with the Indian boys, was in teaching them the necessity and nobility of manual labor. This part of the teaching had to be done by example, words alone made no impression. "They work two hours before dinner and two after dinner with the greatest satisfaction. They all wept when the hoe was put into their hands for the first time." 13 The approval of the Indian Bureau was not wanting. The school however, was not in the place desired by the Government, and so nothing- substantial could be done for its expansion. The letter of the law -was mightier than its spirit. Father Quickenborne at length grew weary of the unequal contest. With a view of locating nigher to the Indian villages," he wrote to Secretary of AVar, Eaton, "I have ceased to admit pupils in the Indian school of this place. I am convinced that the youth of the Aborigines stand in need of as much, perhaps more, assistance after they have left the school than when they actually enjoy its advantages. I hope to be able, perhaps in the course of another year, to afford that assistance according to the plan I have had the honor to lay before your Excellency and of which I have obtained the verbal approbation of our venerable President (Jackson) a few months ago. I conducted home four sons of the principal chief of the Osages, who had received their education at our establishment. Whilst in their villages I proposed the subject of the plan in full council with the approbation of the agent and the previous leave of the President. They have unanimously ex- pressed a most ardent wish to see it put into execution. I will deem it a great favor if the allowance hitherto given to the school of this place could be applied to the new establishment as soon as it will go into operation." 14 12 Verreidt to Dziorizynski, 1826, "Records of Indian Office," "Catholic His- torical Review," IV, p. 472. !3 For particulars cf. Garraghan. op. cit., 473. 1* Van Quickenborne to Eaton, December 30, 1830, in "Records of Indian Office. ' ' 346 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis With this letter the business relations of St. Regis Seminary with the Government ceased : The Indian School closed its doors ; lack of financial support being the chief cause of its decline. Yet it had produced a great deal of good. Some of the Indian pupils, later on, became the chief supporters of the missionary enterprises of their Jesuit teachers. The really great work of the Jesuit Fathers in Missouri was just beginning to take form. But high praise is due to the path- finder and pioneer laborer Father Felix Van Qnickenborne. Chapter 15 THE FIRST INDIAN MISSIONARY EFFORTS OF THE JESUITS The Concordat entered into by Bishop Du Bourg and the Superior of the Maryland Jesuits denned, in a sufficiently precise form, the scope, purpose and methods of the new enterprise centered at St. Ferdinand's. The spiritual jurisdiction of the Jesuit organization extended over the northwest part of the diocese, the Indians were to be their special care, but all the settlements of Europeans fell under their jurisdiction likewise. A number of missionaries were to be pro- vided for the Indians within two years. The Bishop, on his part, agreed to give to the Society his farm at Florissant, and also to ex- tend moral and financial support to the institution. The agreement was approved by the General of the Society of Jesus, Father Aloysius Fortis ; but the Holy See never took action on the matter. Yet, in the eyes of Bishops Du Bourg and Rosati, as well as in the Jesuit Superior 's estimation, the Concordat was considered binding on both sides. The Jesuits built their House and opened their Indian school and attended the various parishes and stations on and beyond the Missouri River, whilst Bishop Du Bourg sent Father Van Quickenborne the title-deeds for the Florissant farm. A brief delay in this was caused by the fact that John Mullanphy held a mortgage of $2000.00 on the property, which the Bishop was unable to cancel, until in 1824, a timely con- tribution from the Association of the Propagation of the Faith saved the situation. The deed was executed in New Orleans on May 25, 1825. The most important stipulations of the Concordat were thus fulfilled, whilst others in their very nature, awaited fulfilment. There was only one clause that caused friction between the Bishop and the Jesuits : the stipulation in regard to the Indian Mission. According to Article V the Jesuits had engaged, "that at the expiration of two years, counting from the time of their arrival at least, four or five missionaries duly qualified, shall proceed to the remote missions, that is, to the Indian settlements in the vicinity of Council Bluffs, and shall there labor towards the attainment of the great object specified above, for the greater glory of God." The two years had now elapsed and only casual visits had been made to some of the less remote tribes, none whatever to the Indians at Council Bluffs or at Prairie du Chien. Bishop Du Bourg became insistent that a beginning be made. General William Clarke, the Indian Superintendent, also urged the necessity of applying to the (347) 348 Hist or ji of the Archdiocese of St. Louis Government for some of the Indian Stations. Father Van Quicken- borne acknowledged that both were right, but pleaded for time, until the work could be undertaken with some hope of success. In the meantime he drew up, at General Clarke's solicitation, the following plan for the civilization of the Indians. 1. Our little Indian Seminary should continue to support the pres- ent number of boys from eight to twelve years of age, while the Ladies of the Sacred Heart in our neighborhood should bring up about as many girls of the same tribe. They should be taken young, from eight to twelve, to habituate them more easily to the customs and in- dustry of civil life, and impress more deeply on their hearts the principles of religion. 2. After five or six years' education, it would be good that each youth should choose a wife among the pupils of the Sacred Heart, before returning to his tribe. 3. Within two or three years two missionaries should go to reside in that nation to gain their confidence and esteem, and gradually per- suade a number to settle together on a tract to be set apart by Govern- ment. Agricultural implements and other necessary tools for the new establishment to be furnished. 1 4. As soon as this new town was formed, some of the couples formed in our establishment should be sent there with one of the said missionaries, who should be immediately replaced, so that two should always be left with the body of the tribe till it was gradually absorbed in the civilized colony. 5. Our missionaries should then pass to another tribe and proceed successively with each in the same manner as the first. 6. As the number of missionaries and our resources increase, the civilization of two or more tribes might be undertaken at once. The expense of carrying out this plan might be estimated thus : Support of 16 to 24 children in the two establishments. . .$1900. Three missionaries 600. Total $2500. 2 Father Van Quickenborne's plan was never carried out, in a manner it deserved to be. Two years later the indefatigable friend of the Indians, proposed it to President Jackson, and received a verbal approval: yet, as larger schemes were then agitating the General's mind, the Van Quickenborne plan was dropped. Hoping against hope, the good Father wrote to the Father General in Rome for a formal ap- Cf. Concordat, Part I, Book III, Chapter 12, of this History. Indian Office Papers, cf. Shea, "History of Indian Missions," p. 406. Tin First Indian Missionary Efforts of tin Jesuits 349 proval. "Follow, as far as possible," came the answer, "the methods employed of old by our Fathers in Paraguay ; for these have been tried and found successful." 3 Father Van Quickenborne made use of the first opportunity given him by the ordination of his six scholastics in 1827, to pay a missionary visit to the Osage Indians beyond the boundary of Missouri. The Osage nation was once in possession of a large portion' of Central Mis- souri, but being pushed back to the west by hostile tribes, they made a treaty with the United States in 1808, by which they ceded almost all their holdings in the State in exchange for new homes on the banks of the Neosho River in Arkansas. They were fine, stately fellows, physically, as Washington Irving describes them. Stern and simple in garb and aspect, with Roman countenances and deep chests, with bust and arms bare, they looked like so many bronze figures. In 1822 they had been visited by Father De La Croix in their old Missouri homes. Father Van Quickenborne found them in 1827, in what is now South-eastern Kansas. A full account of this journey to the Osage country is contained in two of his own letters, written whilst the events were still fresh in his memory. The first letter is addressed to Father Dziorizynski : "I started, as your Reverence knows, on the octave of our Holy Father St. Ignatius, in company with Mr. Hamtranck, who has been always very kind and obliging to me. I traveled as a missionary, hav- ing with me my chapel. I had to take, moreover my tent, mosquito bar and blankets for my bed and some little presents which made my burden rather heavy. The distance is about 350 miles which we travelled in six- teen days. In those parts of the country, this is the way of travelling. At night the horses are let loose, hobbled however, and they must look (Hit for themselves, for all the way from Jefferson City to the Neosho, there is no corn to be had. In the morning, the first thing is to catch the horses. Saddling and packing being done, the day's journey begins, and this always before sunrise. Betwixt ten and eleven o'clock the march stops, the horses are unsaddled, unpacked and permitted to feed. At this hour breakfast and dinner is taken. About three o'clock you start for your place of encampment, which is always taken about rivers or woods with springs; water has always been a-plenty. The lied eonsists of a skin which covers the ground, and two or three blankets. The whole is covered by a mosquito bar, and I can assure you that I slept as comfortable as I ever did on a bed of down. Until we reached the Neosho we had no river to swim. Harmony is a place on the Osage river. Here the Society of Presbyterians of Boston have a missionary 3 Woodstock Letters, 25, 354. 350 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis establishment called by them Harmony. It is about 120 miles from the city of Jefferson, and as many from Lexington on the Missouri. Pour years ago the great village of the Osages was but eight miles from this establishment. Two or three years ago the Indian title to this land was extinguished, and now Harmony and the old site of the Osage village are within the limits of the State. In consequence of the sale of their lands, the Indians (Osages) have removed their village to the banks of the Neosho river 70 or 68 miles further in a south-west direc- tion. Here (On the Neosho within 20 miles) the whole nation is gath- ered in four villages, one called the great village (to this Clairmont 's band must join itself next spring) another called the village of the Little Osage. There are besides two small ones of little importance. The site of these villages is not likely to be changed." 4 "In fact the government, with a view of preventing any removal, has built there three houses, and very good and large houses too, for the three prin- cipal chiefs." 5 Besides, the country was liked by the Osages on account of its natural beauty of forest, prairie and streams. Then, as the nation had only a strip of fifty mile width left to them, and was surrounded on all sides by other nations and the European settlements, they could not move, even if they should wish to do so. As to their numerical strength, Father Van Quickenborne informs us that, "The Agent, Superintendent and Secretary of War think there are 20,000 Osages. Some think they are not so numerous. "The prin- cipal chiefs," continues the letter, "have invited me to their lodges, have been very kind towards me and have promised me their boys. They are, I believe, good Indians. You will have an opportunity to see them next winter at the college, if you choose. I would be glad of it," 6 Regarding the halfbreeds, of whom there were a large number among the Osages the Father tells us that most of them had been baptized Catholics, either at St. Charles, Cote Sans Dessein or Florissant, and all of them had a strong aversion for the Protestant religion yet that all neglected the practice of their own. "The establishment at Harmony is governed as to the general concerns, by a board of com- missioners. The Reverend gentlemen at Harmony are of the Presby- terian persuasion. They have an establishment at Harmony, a station on the Neosho and another at Union on the Arkansas River near Clair- 4 Van Quickenborne to Dziorizynski, Oct. 21, 1827. Archives of Georgetown. 5 Idem, ibidem. <5 Idem, ibidem. The First Indian Missionary Efforts of the Jesuits 351 mont's Band. Each received from Government $600. The Superin- tendent at Harmony is called Dodge." 7 With his consent all the children of the government school came to Father Quickenborne's improvised chapel. "The church vestments which M. De La Croix had used there, had been given to the care of Mr. Dodge and were found in good order. They are nicer and richer than any we have at home. Instead of an altar-piece, I had a banner of fine silk elegantly embroidered and bear- ing a fine engraving of the Blessed Virgin. I can say that my altar was well fixed. Early in the morning the place was crowded with In- dians. The first that came to confession was an Osage of twenty-one who knew a little of the French language. I was extremely pleased with his modest behavior. About the hour appointed for Mass I began to baptize those whom I had prepared. Mr. Dodge and Mrs Dodge with the Rev. Mr. Jones and Mr. Hasten with all their families came to mass, sermon and the ceremonies of Baptism. In their presence I bap- tized about one-third of their school, in all eighteen ; but of those eighteen, several, perhaps six, were not of their school." 8 Mr. Dodge also de- sired to make an address to the children ; but the missionary said it was against the rule of the church. The next day Mr. Dodge invited him to visit his school and there he saw his little and big fellows whom he had baptized, with their medals and crosses on their necks. Father Van Quickenborne expresses his sincere regard for these people of alien faith. "They appeared to me to be moral, industrious, peaceable and good-natured. They related to me how much they had to suffer in the beginning ; what privations they had to undergo, how many days they had been without bread and corn ; how many days they had to live in tents. When will the time come that we will have at least as much courage as these men? If Your Reverence cannot give me a Superior or a Companion, I am willing to go alone." 9 From Harmony Mission Father Van Quickenborne traversed the country in a south-easterly direction to the Osage villages along the Neosho River. What further befell the missionary in the Osage country is told in a letter of his to Madam Xavier, one of the nuns of the Sacred Heart : ' ' From Harmony I set out for the great village situated on the bank of the Neosho River, two days journey from Harmony. About a hundred Indians came out to meet the Agent, in whose company I was. We put up at Mr. Chouteau's place. On the feast of St. Louis, August 25, I had the happiness of saying the first mass ever said in this country. 7 Van Quickenborne to Pziorizynski, Oct. 21, 1827. Archives of Georgetown. 8 Idem, ibidem. 9 Idem, ibidem. 352 History of tht Archdiocesi of Si. Louis It was a Saturday and the following day I proclaimed a jubilee for the few Creoles living among the Osage. Three days after our arrival, I was invited to dinner by the chief of the great village, and two days later by the chief of a village of the Osage, twenty miles farther up the Neosho. 1 was delighted with the reception they gave me as well as with the dispositions they manifested. I remained with them ten weeks and baptized seventeen persons. The three principal chiefs have said that they would send their children to the Seminary and I am inclined to think that they will do so." 10 Father Van Quickenborne's main object in making this excursion was to get boys for his Indian Seminary and to acquaint himself with Indian life : he came to the following conclusion : To christianize the barbarians you must first humanize them : that is to say, you must teach them to abandon their savage manner of living. The greatest obstacle to a genuine conversion are the plurality of wives and the barbarous custom of selling their daughters in marriage. In order to combat their vices successfully, the Indians must live under the eye of the missionary. The devoted Father offered to serve in the difficult mission, but not as Superior. With a quick and sure judgment, he proposed the youthful Father De Smet for this great opportunity. He, the old and tired man was willing to take his former novice as his Super- ior. In the Spring of 1828 the zealous Superior made a second journey to the Osage Indians. "Visiting first the Harmony Mission on the Marais des Cygnes, where he renewed acquaintance with the Osage children he had baptized the preceding year he continued his journey thence to the Great Osage village on the Neosho. Here and in the other Indian villages in the vicinity he practiced his ministry, of preaching and administering the sacraments. He performed seventeen baptisms in the course of this second Osage excursion, but no record of them has survived. Many adult Indians were eager to be baptized ; but of the number, he found only five or six worthy of the grace, the loose, savage ways of the average Osage adult being an effectual barrier to the practice of a Christian life. When Father Van Quickenborne set out on his return journey from the Neosho, he had in his company a little Osage "prince," who had been delivered to his charge with a display of Indian ceremony, to be educated in the Indian school at Florissant." 11 io Van Quickenborne to Madam Xavier. li " Annates de la Propagation de la Foi,'' vol. IV, p. 572. The First Indian Missionary Efforts of the Jesuits 353 "In 1830 Father Van Quiekenborne paid a third visit to the Osage. His route brought him first to the villages they had formed along the Mariton River in what is now Bourbon County, Kansas, not far from the present Fort Scott. From the Marmiton he turned to the south- west, visiting on his way all the Indian lodges on the Neosho as far as its junction with the Saline, about forty miles north of Fort Gibson and establishing missionary stations in the Osage settlements on Chouteau, Prior and Cabin Creeks. His zealous labors extended therefore, far within the limits of what is now Oklahoma and very probably represent the earliest exercise of the Catholic ministry in that part of the Union." 12 !2 Garraghan, Gilbert J. "History of the Missouri Province of the Society of Jesus," in MS. Vol. 1-12 Chapter 16 THE ST. LOUIS UNIVERSITY The Catholic Church is in its very nature the world's great educa- tional institution in spiritual matters. It is her divine commission to teach all nations and to teach them to observe all things that Christ taught her. But, as all truth is one, whether it be of the natural or the supernatural order, the Church has at all times endeavored to combine with her divine teaching of religion, the subsidiary instruction in the human sciences and arts. In other words, the Church has always sought to establish schools of learning in the shadow of her temples of faith. So it was in the diocese of St. Louis. As soon as religion had been es- tablished on a solid foundation by the first resident Bishop, a college was founded at the Cathedral. As early as January 8th, 1818, Bishop Du Bourg wrote : ' ' The people are most anxious that I should erect a college." 1 The college was established and ran its course of usefulness, to be merged at last in the Jesuit College that was, under God's blessing, to grow into what we now hold so dear, the St. Louis University. "They, (the Jesuits) will take the College of St. Louis," wrote Bishop Du Bourg from Bordeaux, on June 24th, 1824, "in this way they will insure its stability. ' ' 2 The Jesuits themselves had, during their early days at St. Ferdinand, devoted most of their time and energy to educational pur- poses : the Novitiate was a school of divinity ; St. Regis Seminary was a primary school for boys. Out of these educational ventures grew the true universitas literarum, a school that united in its teaching every branch of knowledge necessary for a liberal education. St. Louis Uni- versity had to pass through a long course of heroic endeavor and sac- rifice to attain its high position among the educational institutions of the country. It was the pioneer of higher education in the Mississippi Valley, and sustained all the vicissitudes of pioneering. The connection between the old and the new College of St. Louis is indicated in Bishop Du Bourg 's letter to Father Francis Neale, the Maryland Superior of the Jesuits, dated November 27, 1823 : "I would feel disposed to give your Society two beautiful squares of ground in the City of St. Louis and to help in the erection of a house for an academy as a preparation for a college, if you thought you could spare a couple of your Maryland brethren, even scholastics, to com- i "Annales de la Propagation de la Foi, " vol. II, p. 339. 2 Annales, vol. I, p. 474. (354) The St. Louis University 355 meuee the establishment; in which case I will shut up the one that is now kept by some of my priests on the Bishop 's premises. ' ' 3 In a subsequent letter to Father Van Quickenborne the prelate once more offered to close his own college, in case the Jesuits should open an institution in St. Louis. Father Van Quickenborne, in com- municating this offer to his Superior, mentions the difficulties in the way of such a foundation: Yet, he observes: "The City of St. Louis is the principal one of the state, and near other rising towns in Illinois. If our men were there, many day-scholars would attend school ; of these, some would enter the Society, especially if, according to the In- stitute, we teach gratis." 4 Father Charles Nerinckx, on his visit to Florissant, was also con- sulted on the matter, and commissioned to submit Father Quickenborne 's ideas to Bishop Rosati at the Barrens. Bishop Du Bourg answered from Xew Orleans : ' ' First in importance among these matters is your es- tablishment in St. Louis. To forward it and give it all desirable sta- bility and independence, I offer you two fine squares in Connor 's addition to the city on the same conditions on which they were given to me, to wit, that a college should be built upon one of them (it does not matter which) and that it should be in operation within seven years of the date of the bond of conveyance, which was made over to me in the year 1819 or 1820. There still remains sufficient time to put up a small house, either of log or frame ; for, as the dimensions and material of the building were not specified in the bond, any kind of structure suited to receive some thirty day-scholars, or even fewer, will meet the re- quirements. I f orsee two difficulties in the way of your acceptance ; 1st. the expense and 2nd your rules. As to the first, I am persuaded that you will receive aid from the inhabitants, if you make the rounds of the city for such purpose. I will myself contribute one hundred dollars. As to the rules of your Society or the difficulty of your taking in charge the direction of the school, there is nothing to prevent you, while these hindrances last, from putting the school in the hands of some master, to whom you can lease it or even lend it gratis. I regard this property as too precious a thing, in view of the future interests of religion and of your Society, not to urge you to make every effort to assure yourself of its possession ; moreover, as the time is approaching after which re- grets will be useless, I am persuaded that you can go far in this matter on your own responsibility, with the understanding that, in view of the urgency of the case, you cannot fail to obtain subsequently the approval of your Superior." 5 3 Du Bourg to Francis Neale, S. J., Nov. 27, 1823. 4 Van Quickenborne to Dziorizynski, Jan. 1, 1824. 5 Du Bourg to Van Quickenborne, Nov. 9, 1825. 356 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis Father Van Quickenborne was anxious to undertake the great work : yet he advised the Bishop to propose the matter to the Maryland Su- perior, adding this characteristic sentiment: "It will require a miracle to give us a college at St. Louis, such as our Institute demands, namely, one which is free for day-pupils, and which for that reason must have an adequate revenue. Still I dare to hope it of the Divine goodness." 6 The two squares offered by the Bishop to Father Van Quickenborne were the gift of Jeremiah Connor, who had laid out Washington Avenue through his land. He was always open handed, where the cause of the Church was concerned. It was he who had made the generous contribution to the fund collected for the purpose of putting Church and presbytere in order for the proper reception of Bishop Du Bourg in 1818. But Connor's loyal intention came very near to being nullified after his premature death. His estate was sold under the sheriff's hammer, and bought in by Col. John 'Fallon. The new owner of the College lot sold it to Jesse Lindell for $210.00. But Father Van Quickenborne recovered it for its original purpose by an exchange sale. The lot had a frontage of 270 feet on Washington Avenue, between Ninth and Tenth Streets. Greatly elated by his success, Father Van Quickenborne wrote to Father Dzioryzinski : ' ' I got the College lot. The agreement is written and signed by both parties, Mr. Lindell and myself. I pay nothing, but give the same quantity of land to Mr. Lindell, and that quantity I take from lots belonging to Bishop Du Bourg, but placed at my disposal." 7 In the summer of 1828, towards the end of the Third Year of Probation, Father Van Quickenborne wrote out for his Superior the mighty reasons, why the St. Louis College plan should be carried out at once. The deeds for the College lots had been accepted, which implied the duty of open- ing a school : The time was now favorable : a further delay might keep the Jesuits out forever; the future progress of the Order depended on the establishment of a College in a populous city like St. Louis: many complaints were made by the inhabitants of St. Louis about not having a single Catholic school. "Your Beverence sees that we must now go on," Father Van Quickenborne concludes his long letter, "I have a beautiful square, 270 ft. by 225 ft. belonging to me, of which I shall send the deed to your Reverence. The Bishop must and does approve it ; I have no doubt but a fine church will be built also for us in process of time. Mr. Saulnier, Dusaussois, Loisel, priests at St. Louis, also approve it. The people de- mand it and are willing to subscribe for the building. They highly Van Quickenborne to Du Bourg, Annales, 1827. i Van Quickenborne to Dziorizynski, Feb. 12, 182fi. The St. Louis University 357 cry for a church where sermons in English are preached. The French want the present church for themselves. The Bishop is willing, i. e. has given me his word that, not only is he pleased that we should have a church, but also a parochial school for the Americans. The Bishop has waited now for two years. If we do not do it, the people will expect it from him and he should and would do it. St. Louis (that is, an es- tablishment there) is necessary for our Indian mission. 1) there we can easily and with all possible advantage see and treat with the chiefs of every nation. 2) There we can easily know every event of importance concerning affairs connected with the Indian mission. 3) There reside the Superintendent of Indian Affairs and all the agents and traders whose good will we must cultivate. 4) There we must transact almost all our affairs to begin, continue and support our establishment in the Indian country. 5) By opening a free school we oblige those very men whose assistance we want, and gain a good share of popularity. 6) St. Louis' fate is decided as to its becoming a large and very im- portant city in the West. From this place we may expect a succession, (of novices) as the classical education of a child will not be expensive to the parent, and as there are many families truly pious who would be glad to see their children embracing a religious life. 7) The choice of a proper place for our establishment is of the highest importance. About St. Louis being the proper place there can be no doubt, and the time of making the choice is now and precisely and only now. "As to the means of supporting Ours, 8 let me, Rev. Superior, bring to your recollection the poor estate in which we came out. Great im- provements we are making on our farm in conformity with your Reverence's instructions and, when they will be finished, I will give an accurate account of them. We have a fine new church in St. Charles, a fine house, the whole worth $10,000, and burdened with no debts. Ours in St. Louis will be supported in the following way : From our farm, which will be fully competent to support eight persons in St. Louis and twelve novices in Florissant; moreover, forty Indian boys; for their support we have received and will receive from the charity of the faithful whatever is necessary. Having a negro family there, the produce of the farm will sell much higher, as we would be enabled to attend market to our advantage. Our farm has given now a surplus of $1000 yearly, and we hope that it will continue to do so and that the Almighty will not dimish His liberality. We have now a very fine and large crop of corn, wheat and potatoes. "Twelve boarders could be and, I dare say, almost should be kept, paying for board and tuition $100. This would put lis on the advance 8 ' ' Ours " is a Jesuit expression for our members. 358 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis and help towards paying for the future church. This once built, the pew-rent would give from four to five hundred dollars a year. The intentions of masses and alms which we get now regularly from St. Louis and which amount to $120 a year would surely not be diminished. "At present two Fathers would do at St. Louis to begin, and two would remain for the Indian mission. I would place at St. Louis Father Verhaegen, Elet and De Smet with Rev. Father De Theux, whom, how- ever, I would not fix at St. Louis ; in my absence among the Indians, he should be at Florissant. At any rate I would not fix more than two fathers at the college so as to have one or two to spare for emer- gencies. Some offer themselves for lay-brothers who seem to be pretty well calculated to teach after their noviceship, spelling, reading, writing, arithmetic, and in that case we would gain a Father. The main point will be to have one who would give a reputation to the college, would maintain strict religious discipline among Ours, and have things in the school go on with great regularity. "Of the two, Father De Theux and Verhaegen, I would give the preference to Father Verhaegen. For my part, if I cannot go to the Indians, I would be very willing and satisfied to teach, for the remainder of my days, a grammar class." 9 Father Dziorizynski gave his approval, and Father Van Quickenborne now publicly announced his intention of opening a College at St. Louis : ' ' In response to your solicitations as well as those of Msgr. Du Bourg, we have decided to do the same thing here, namely, to open, as soon as possible, a college, in which, day-scholars will be taught free of charge. I have made an exchange for the College lot, donated by Mr. Connor and it is there I propose to erect a building such as the subscriptions will allow. By order of Our Superior the Third Year of of Probation came to an end on the feast of St. Ignatius, so that now we are entirely free." 10 Building operations were begun in November 1828 : and subscrip- tions rapidly assumed the splendid proportion of half the cost of the edifice. Father De Smet added $3000. to the fund, and Father Van Quickenborne himself offered to contribute his patrimony, estimated at $2000. Bishop Du Bourg 's good will was assured. Bishop Rosati was delighted. An attempt, however, of Senator Thomas H. Benton to obtain from Congress an allowance of a whole township of land for the endowment of the College, was bound to fail, though the movement did no harm. o Van Quickenborne to Dziorizynski, Fall of 1828. io Van Quickenborne to Rosati, Sept. 1, 1828. The St. Louis University 359 The school was. opened on November 2nd, 1829, with an enrollment of ten boarders and thirty externs, which quickly increased to a total of one hundred and fifty pupils. Father Peter Verhaegen was oppointed Acting President, as representath'e of Father Van Quickenborne, until the Maryland Superior should have made a permanent assignment. Father Elet was made Procurator; Father Peter Walsh, S. J. a recent accession, Prefect of Studies ; Father De Theux, as Minister, took charge of the domestic affairs. This staff of four professors did not appear sufficient to man a College : in fact, for the first and second year the institution was but a grammar school. Within two years, however, the study of Latin and Greek was introduced. In consequence the staff also had to be in- creased. In October 1837, Father John Van Lommel and M. Jodocus Van Sweevelt arrived from Georgetown, to be followed by Father James Oliver Van de Velde. Father Van Lommel was soon assigned to mis- sionary work. On December 28th, 1832, the St. Louis College was raised to the dignity and style of the ' ' St. Louis University ; ' ' under a charter granted by the State Legislature, by which it was enabled to combine with its literary and scientific department the faculties of theology, law and medicine, as it did in later years. 11 The Asiatic cholera, that visited St. Louis in 1832 and again in 1833, did not claim a single victim in the College, though the mortality in the city was very high. In 1832, Father Van de Velde made a trip through the South in the interest of the College. The foundation of another Jesuit College in Louisiana began to be mooted in 1831. Yet, new buildings were required in St. Louis. Father Verhaegen humorously describes the difficulties of building operations in Missouri. "Our new wing is now ready to re- ceive the roof. Our workmen in Missouri are mighty slow. They al- ways promise ; they never refuse : but without any ceremony on their part, they let us wait. We have now come to the resolution of stop- ping improving our place till we get out of debt. Hence, when I will have erected, constructed, raised, put up and completed, a smokehouse, the expense of which may not reach $150. I must consign all my other plans to the darkness of one of the drawers of my desk, there to lie, till they shall be called into action again. When the happy time shall have arrived, I will begin to crow as loud as I ever did." 12 n Hill, "Historical Sketches of St. Louis University." 12 Verhaegen to McSherry, Oct. 16, 1823. 360 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis And again on May 14, 1836, Father Verhaegen writes to Father MeSherry at Georgetown: "You are not unacquainted with the severe trials we experienced here, and certain it is that they have heen the means used by Providence to crown our labors with a success which five years ago we did not anticipate Father Elet started for Louisi- ana on the 14th of this month. He will spend the winter in the South and try to collect what is due the institution. Times are hard at St. Louis, and money is scarce .... Before next April we shall have our full number, 150 boarders. This is the ne plus ultra. Our buildings cannot accommodate more. Thank God I have at present very able and edifying secular professors — They assist at Mass with the students every day and they regularly frequent the sacraments." 13 The Jesuit College, now the St. Louis University, was an ac- complished fact. 13 Verhaegen to MeSherry. For further data on the Beginnings of the St. Louis University, cf. Garraghan, G. J. in "St. Louis Historical Review," vol. I, pp. 85-103. w TO i— < CO K* 1 m h ^ n w rh a o r -r"* H 4-^ cz: E— pd <; n x <-; X ££ CQ >, »JU ~~ X 33 2^ ^ K s c er-. — r ^ H- 1 u *- ^H rv» X C^ PQ Chapter 17 STE. GENEVIEVE UNDER FATHERS PRATTE AND DAHMEN The oldest town on the Missouri side of the river, having a cor- porate existence at the time of Bishop Rosati's appointment, was Ste. Genevieve. The church there was a Jesuit foundation dating back to the palmy days of Kaskaskia. The succession of pastors or missionary priests had been : the Jesuit Fathers : Philibert Watrin, John B. Salleneuve, J. Morinie, from 1760-1768, Father Pierre Gibault, 1768- 1773 : the Capuchin Father Hilaire, from 1773-1777 ; the Jesuit Sebastian Meurin and Father Gibault, 1778-1784: the Capuchin Louis Guignes, from 1786-1789 : the Carmelite Paul de St. Pierre, from 1789-1796 : then Father James Maxwell, from 1796-1814, and the pastor of Prairie du Rocher, Father Donatien Olivier, from 1814-1816. The succession of pastors was carried down with but few and short intervals, a cir- cumstance which in a large measure, accounts for the staunch Catholicity and good moral condition of the people in the town and its surrounding districts. It was Ste. Genevieve that gave to the Church the first native priest of Missouri, Father Henry Pratte. Born at Ste Genevieve, Jan- uary 19, 1788, and baptized by Father Louis Guignes, on February 18th, young Henry attended the village school taught by Francis Moro. From childhood on he was noted for his gentle and pious disposition. In 1803 he was sent to the Sulpician Seminary, at Montreal, where he was or- dained to the priesthood in 1815. In the previous year Father James Maxwell the pastor of Ste. Genevieve had been thrown from his horse and killed. On hearing this the newly ordained priest called on Bishop Flaget at Bardstown, then administrating the affairs of the Louisana dio- cese, and asked to be appointed pastor of his native town. Bishop Flaget, being well acquainted with the people of Ste. Genevieve and hav- ing a high regard for the young priest's family, granted the request. Father Pratte entered upon his duties in October 1815. The parish of Ste. Genevieve included the dependencies : Old Mines, Cape Girardeau, Little Canada, St. Michaels, and of course the neighboring New Bourbon. The young cure's field of labor was very extensive, and laborious: but contrary to the proverb, "a prophet is not acceptable in his own coun- try," Father Pratte was idolized by the people among whom he had spent his childhood. He took possession of the little house which had been bought by the people of the town in 1786 from Nicholas Roussin for a parochial residence, enlarged it, and his father came to live with him. The old log-church had been moved in 1794 by Father De Saint Pierre from the Old Village to the new location on the hills, and had inci- (361) 362 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis dentally changed its name from St. Joachim to Ste. Genevieve. Father Pratte enlarged it by building a new sacristy, using the old one for a sanctuary, thus increasing the seating capacity, he put in a new floor, a new roof and plastered the building. Ste. Genevieve owes to Father Pratte the renewal of its piety and the blessing of Christian education of the children ; to teach the Catechism was his delight. The preparation of the First-Communicants was always a long and thorough course. But, the numerous stations where the miners and farmers might gather for divine worship often called him away from home. Bishop Rosati in his beautiful obituary of Father Pratte gives him credit for the foundation of two Churches, one at Old Mines in Washington County, and the other in St. Michael's near Fredericktown, in Madison County. Both were log structures. Old Mines is, as we have shown, the earliest place that sprung up at the headwaters of the Black River, tributary to the Meramec, in the days of Renault. It is very probable that the Jesuit Fathers from Kaskaskia visited the place at times, though they had no mission there. The record of the church of Ste. Ann of Fort Chartres, in an entry under date of September 28th, 1748, shows that one Pierre Vivarenne, of Picardy, France, and his wife, Marianne Rondeau, were inhabitants of the Village of the Mine. This Vivarenne certainly came from France with Renault. As early as 1793, the church records of Ste. Genevieve make mention of Old Mines and in 1803 the population consisted of thirty-two men, thirteen women, seventy-two children and eighteen slaves. The church records of Ste. Genevieve show that Father Maxwell frequently visited the Mine, but it was Father Pratte who built the first church of which records exist. These records begin April 20th, 1820, in his handwriting. The little church he built was of logs and was used until 1828, when Father John Bouillier, C. M., the first resident pastor, built the present brick church, which Avas begun in 1828 and blessed by Bishop Rosati October 9th, 1831. These facts are derived from Ida M. Schaaf's article on Father Henry Pratte. 1 A few more statements from the same authority on Ste. Genevieve will be acceptable. The distance from Ste. Genevieve to Old Mines, being about sixty miles over steep, rocky hills was long and tiring. At a point about midway was a wonderful spring, and at this place travelers were wont to stop and rest and perhaps, spend the night in camp. A few men of Ste. Genevieve and Old Mines, some of them related by blood to Father i Schaaf, Ma M., "Henri Pratte, Missouri's first native-born priest," "St. Louis Catholic Historical Eeview," vol. V, pp. 129-149. The letters of Father Pratte to Rosati are to be found in the Archives of the St. Louis Archdiocese. Ste. Genevieve Under Fathers Pratte and Dahmen 363 Pratte, built a blacksmith shop there and later, a road house. Antonine Aubuchon built a home there in 1826. Although the first church built at this little settlement, called Petit Canada, was in 1828, it is quite probable that Father Pratte offered the holy sacrifice of the Mass for these settlers many a time when passing along the way. The village of St. Michaels in Madison County owes it origin to a number of French Creoles from New Bourbon and Ste. Genevieve, who in 1799, obtained a grant of 5200 arpents of land between the headwaters of the Saline and Castor Creeks. They built their log-houses in the valley, south of the Mine La Motte claim, near a ridge on which the city of Fredericktown was founded later on. But owing to an inundation they removed their village a little distance to the northeast. It was here on the road from Ste. Genevieve to Mine La Motte that Father Maxwell was wont to stay and minister to the Catholics of the neighborhood. But the people gradually drifted back to the old location, and in 1820 Father Pratte built for them the first Church of St. Michaels. It was constructed of walnut-logs and served the parish there as a place of worship until Father Cellini moved it to the higher location just on the edge of the newly founded village of Fredericktown. Mine La Motte one of the earliest settlements of the State is within the limits of the parish of Old St. Michaels. In addition to looking after his own parish of St. Genevieve and establishing the two new parishes at Old Mines and St. Michaels, to which he was obliged to travel on horseback, his house was the half-way house between St. Louis and the Seminary at the Barrens, where he entertained all priests passing back and forth. Many and various were the services Father Pratte rendered to the Fathers of the Seminary at the Barrens. As the Church Records of Ste. Genevieve, beginning October 22nd, 1817, to January 30th, 1818, are in the hand writing of Father De Andreis, it may be inferred that Father Pratte was in St. Louis the greater part of three months, superintending the repairs and prepar- ing for the Bishop's reception. Then, at the end of the year 1817, he returned to Ste. Genevieve to welcome Bishop Du Bourg to his diocese, and to be present at the first Pontifical Mass of that prelate on January 1st, 1818. After the arrival of Father Rosati and his band of Professors and Seminarians at the Barrens there began a regular exchange of letters between Fathers Pratte and Rosati, the remains of which are preserved in the Archives of St. Louis Archidocese. The great helper in all needs, the great counselor in all doubts, was the kindly yet shrewd pastor of Ste. Genevieve. Still, he had a temper, though he generally succeeded in keeping it under control. Even the venerated Rosati once came in 364 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis for a sharp rebuff : Father Pratte had announced Confirmation services for the 22nd day of August 1819. Father Desmoulin of Kaskaskia, and Father Olivier of Prairie du Rocher were invited to be present at the solemnities. Now came an order from Rosati that Father Pratte should notify both Fathers Desmoulin and Olivier, that the Confirmation services were postponed, and that Father Olivier should fill the place of Father Desmoulin at Kaskaskia on the day they were to be held. Father Pratte answered under date of August 14, 1819 : "Monsieur: — I am much affected by the humiliating letter you have written to me, and I have not sent the letter for Mr. Desmoulin of Kaskaskia as you ask me to do in your letter. I will retain it until I have an order from Monseigneur who gave me instructions just con- trary to the requests you have addressed to me. It seems to me that an order that has been fixed by Monseigneur 2 cannot be changed without a shock to the public and to myself. I have announced to my parish that Monseigneur will confirm at Ste. Genevieve on the 22nd of this month. Many persons are already prepared and waiting. These people come thirty or forty miles to have this pleasure. Furthermore, this is the fourth time that I have announced publicly something on the part of the Bishop which has failed to take place, and this seems to me to be too much. They have already complained at Ste. Genevieve; what will they say this time ? I shall not make any announcements and things will come out all right according to the original orders. You tell me to inform Mr. Olivier to go to Okaw. I have invited him, and he will be in Ste. Genevieve. Furthermore, you seem to ignore the fact that a man of seventy years cannot travel fifteen miles to assist at a ceremony after having said Mass in his own parish. It would be for him a journey of half a day. I have the honor to be, Your humble servant, II. Pratte, Cure" As a sample of Father Pratte 's priestly zeal and provident care the following extracts from his letters give fair evidence. A Mission was to be held at Ste. Genevieve the last week in December, 1820. On October 28th, 1820. he writes to Father Rosati: "I shall have, I hope, an opportunity to write to Mr. Niel (then pastor of St. Louis and noted as an orator) next week. He promised he would come for the feast of Ste. Genevieve. I will write, and ask him to preach the panegyric. We shall have on that day, the installation of a beautiful picture of Ste. Genevieve, which has been given for the occasion. They say it is very beautiful. Mr. Desmoulin will come and preach on hell, I shall preach two sermons — one on the judgment, penance and the delay 2 "Monsigneur" is, of course, Bishop Du Bourg. Rosati was Vicar-General of this diocese. Ste. Genevieve Under Fathers Pratte and Dahmen 365 of conversion — one on contrition and the difficulty of saving your soul." Later, on December 20th, he writes : "I have already announced a Mission for the last week of the year, and it will be finished the next Sunday, which is the feast of Ste. Genevieve. I hope to have Mr. Niel with me on that day. ' ' The same letter is followed by a postscript : "I learn at this moment of the accident to Mr. Rosati. I sympa- thize with him in his sufferings, and pray you to present to him my very humblest respects, also those of my father who is much grieved to learn of this trouble. If this accident should disarrange the Mission, I beg of you to let me know before Sunday." Of Father Pratte 's innate kindness and gentle manner many fine traits are preserved in our documents : One or two must suffice : Thus he writes on June 24th, 1821 to Father Rosati at the Barrens. "I have just received a letter from Shawneetown from an unfortunate woman who recommends herself to me and asks if I can give her news of her husband who was to have joined her at Shawneetown last fall. This unfortunate creature lived some time at Ste. Genevieve and is now in your county at the house of a man named Logan on Apple Creek. His name is Edward McGinnis, aged about thirty years, of a red complexion, of Irish birth. You can perhaps inquire among your people if he goes to church and try to get him to return to his poor wife and four children who are in great distress. I have replied to this woman and told her that I have written you on the subject." A certain sly humor lurks in the following passage of a letter to Rosati: "I am returning by Francois and Medard the little horse on which the laborer came from the Barrens. This man came to me early Monday morning and shoAved to me a billet de banque, which you gave him. He told me he could not buy the tools he needs, as the cheek will not pass here. I did not want to let him go without tools, so I loaned him five gourdes, which I charged to the Bishop. Since then I have never seen him again ; whether or not he has returned, I do not know ; so I return to you the horse." The Louisiana Academy established by Father Maxwell in 1808 had been closed after the founder 's death, as its principal, Mann Butler, the historian of Kentucky, had withdrawn from the position. Father Pratte realizing the necessity of a Catholic school, sought to reestablish the Academy on a thoroughly Catholic basis. It was known that Bishop Du Bourg had brought along with him three Brothers of the Christian Schools, Aubin, Antonin and Fulgence. They had been obtained from the Superior General, Brother Gerbaud at the personal intercession of Pope Pius VII, who wrote, December 30th, 1815 : "Our Venerable Brother William Du Bourg, consecrated and named by us as Bishop of New Orleans, ardently desires to have some of your 366 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis subjects to instruct the youth of his vast diocese which is in great need. We earnestly recommend to you, our dear son, this affair, and we wish, if you have some subjects who are willing to devote themselves to go into this region and whom you judge fit for this pious work, you would send them if this can be conveniently done. This will be a work very pleasing to God and to ourselves. ' ' 3 The Brothers were lodged for a time with the Vincentian Brothers under Father De la Croix at the home of Mrs. Layton, for the purpose of acquiring the English language and helping in the building oper- ations of the Seminary. Bishop Du Bourg had been told by Brother Gerbaud, that the Brothers must maintain community life, and should, therefore, not be separated. But when Father Pratte's request for one of the Brothers came, he sent Brother Antonin alone, because he had made greater progress in English than the others. Early in January 1819 the Pastor of Ste. Genevieve wrote Father Rosati his satisfaction that Brother Antonin was at Ste. Genevieve. Brother Aubin and Fulgence soon joined • Brother Antonin and they continued to teach at Ste. Genevieve for three years. They kept school in the Building which had been erected in 1808 by the citizens of Ste. Genevieve under the direction of Father Maxwell for the Louisiana Academy. After the death of Father Pratte, when the Parish was placed in charge of the Vincentian Fathers, the three Brothers were separated by the Bishop and placed at the head of three schools in widely separated localities. Finding communication with each other and with their Superiors very difficult, they seem to have gradually lost the spirit of their state and, one by one, left the Order. In a letter written to Father Rosati on July 18th, 1822, Father Pratte regrets that he cannot accept the invitation, ' ' so often repeated, ' ' to assist at the celebration of the feast of St. Vincent, "because of the great number who are ill at Ste. Genevieve and at Kaskaskia, from where they send for me very often." This seems to have been the last letter written by him, for in August he was stricken by a fever and, after three weeks of illness, died on September 1st, 1822. He was so beloved that he was mourned by everyone, Protestants as well as Catholics, and his funeral was attended by all the inhabitants of the village and surrounding country. He was interred under the sanctuary of the church. Father Rosati conducted the services, assisted by Father Olivier of Prairie du Rocher, and wrote on the record a beautiful tribute to his departed friend which concludes with these words : ' ' His memory will be a benediction not only in the parish but in all the rest of the Diocese, and particularly, to the Seminary, which will always regard him as one of its principal benefactors." 4 3 Archives of Christian Brothers, Poeautico Hills, New York. 4 Eegister of Burials, Ste. Genevieve Parish. Ste. Genevieve Under Fathers Pratte and Dahmen 367 After Father Pratte 's unexpected death Bishop Du Bourg had the intention of appointing his favorite Angelo Inglesi as his successor in Ste. Genevieve. Inglesi was at that time in Europe, hobnobbing with almost all the royalty and nobility of the Old world, and making large collections for the poor Mission of Louisiana. If he had been present on the spot, he would have certainly received the appointment. But Inglesi 's unworthiness was already suspected by many: and for some reason or other, not the clerical highflyer, but a most excellent priest, Father Francis Dahmen, a Lazarist, was sent to Ste. Genevieve. Father Dahmen was born at Dueren on the Rhine, March 23, 1789, and in due time entered the Seminary, probably at Cologne. As all the country west of the Rhine was under French dominion during the Napoleonic wars, young Dahmen, as we have already stated, was obliged to enter the army of the Corsican as a cavalry soldier. As such he took part in several great battles. As Canon O'Hanlon tells us: "He had a vivid recollection of the dreadful scenes he had witnessed on the battle- field: his anecdotes of the Emperor Napoleon were original and most interesting ; he was ready at all times to relate his own personal adven- tures, and freely to pronounce a very sound opinion on the maneuvers and policy of his renowned leader, having had an enthusiastic regard for his genius and resources as a general. Father Dahmen 's undoubted courage, sense of honor, uprightness and integrity of character won our admiration; his brusque and military air was independent of forms, while his courtesy and kindliness rendered him lovable to a degree. His piety and learning were well recognized, when he was obliged to quit his Saxon Seminary and serve as a young conscript, and he returned to resume his religious vocation and studies when the great army was disbanded." 3 The discharged soldier did not, however, return to his former Seminary but journeyed to the Eternal City where a brother of his had already entered the holy priesthood. When Bishop Du Bourg visited Rome for the purpose of . gaining recruits for the diocese of Louisiana, young Dahmen was glad to join his standard, and when Fathers De Andreis and Rosati started on their long and wearisome journey across the mountains and plains to Bordeaux and thence across the sea to America, he was with them. He received the four minor orders at Bordeaux, subdeaconship at St. Thomas Seminary near Bards- town, deaconship at Ste. Genevieve. In December 1818 he entered the Novitiate of the Congregation under Father De Andreis in St. Louis, where also he was ordained priest by Bishop Du Bourg on September 5th, 1819. He was then a little over thirty years of age. His first mission was Vincennes, from which he was recalled on account of non-support. O'Hanlon. 368 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis On May 28th, we find liim at the Barrens, where he made his final vows. As the people of Vincennes petitioned the Bishop to send back to their parish the good Father Dahmen, the Bishop relented, and the priest returned. But as no efforts were made to give him a decent support, the recall was made final. After a short stay at Floris- sant during Father De La Croix' visit among the Indians tribes of the Missouri River in 1822, Father Dahmen received the appointment to Ste. Genevieve, where he arrived on September 29th, 1822. This selection was an admirable one in more than one respect. He spoke and wrote French as his mother tongue, though he was of German stock. The schools in the Rhineland in his youth were French, whilst the language of the common people remained German. In the army French had been spoken almost exclusively. As Canon O'Hanlon tells us, he had a correct knowledge of the world and of its ordinary pursuits, with a practical manner of appreciating and utilizing them. He had a natural gift of eloquence in French, English and German. His cheerful disposition won every heart : his fine figure and military bearing and sturdy manliness im- pressed the judgment in his favor. He was, all in all, a representative man. When the citizens of Ste. Genevieve wished to form a Literary Society, Father Dahmen was with them heart and soul. The Church of Ste. Genevieve was a large log-building erected in 1794. Now after thirty-seven years of constant use the building had become ruinous. The parishioners voted to erect a new Church of stone. The old log structure was accordingly torn down, and the cornerstone of the new edifice was laid on the 27th of July 1831. The building, though completed at an early date, was consecrated in 1837. It was in Father Dahmen 's hospitable home that the celebrated Father Charles Nerinckx died the death of a saint. He came from Lor- etto in Kentucky to Bethlehem Convent near the Barrens on a visit to his Sisterhood there : then he made a visit to Florissant, the home of the Jesuits, whom he had brought to America, and on the return journey took seriously ill, and found a kind welcome in Ste. Genevieve, where he died, August 12th, 1824. 6 Of the former dependencies of Ste. Genevieve, New Bourbon was now no more ; St. Michaels had a pastor of its own in the person of Father Potini, and after his departure, of Father Francis Cellini ; Cape Girardeau was attended from the Barrens, and only St. Joachim's of Old Mines remained in his care until in 1828. Father John Bouillier was appointed its pastor. Yet, St. Genevieve was growing in population, and certain parts of the district were steadily gaining swarms of immi- grants from Germany. At the opening of the Nineteenth Century there were but few Germans in the parish ; but in the second decade of that G Kothensteiner, "Father Charles Nerinckx, and his Relations to the Diocese of St. Louis," in "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. I, 157-201. Ste. Genevieve Under Fathers Pratte and Dahmen 369 Century, German immigration assumed considerable proportions in both Ste. Genevieve and Perry Counties. At first this stream came from Alsace, then almost exclusively from the Duchy of Baden. Matthew Ziegler seems to have been the first German, after Father de Saint Pierre, to come to Ste. Genevieve. As the ever increasing immigration of German Catholics neces- sitated a corresponding increase of the number of German priests, the authorities were on the look-out for German Seminarians. In 1833 the Seminary counted four students of German descent, among its pupils : J. H. Fortman from Westphalian Muenster, Ambrose Heim, Charles Rolle and Nicholas Stehle from Lorraine, Casper Ost- langenberg and Joseph Fischer arriving a little later. When Father John Timon became Superior of the Lazarists, he thought of Father Dahmen 's capabilities as a teacher, especially his knowledge of German, and he determined to recall him to the Seminary. Bishop Rosati appointed the Frenchman J. Bergeron as successor to Dahmen as pastor of Ste. Genevieve. On the 18th of May Father Dahmen left the parish for the Seminary. But the people of Ste. Genevieve were determined that the good pastor, who during the fourteen years of his ministry among them, had enjoyed their confidence and reverence and love, should be sent back to them. As the best means to attain this much desired object, they determined, at a regular parish meeting, held on Pentecost Sunday, at the parish residence, to sell, at a nominal price, the Church and all pertaining to it, to Father Timon the Superior of the Congregation of the Missions. In notifying their Bishop of this proposed step they hint, that this offer is made in the hope that Father Dahmen be left in charge of the parish as before, a measure, as they declare, "as conductive to the progress of religion, as it is calculated to secure the prosperity of the village." 7 Bishop Rosati prevailed upon Father Timon, who was then Supe- rior of the Vincentians and Vicar General of the diocese, to send Father Dahmen back to Ste. Genevieve. The transfer of the Church property to Father John Timon was duly affected. Father Bergeron gracefully accepted the inevitable and retired to the "more hospitable land, New Orleans." Father Dahmen returned to his flock and received as assistants Father Mignard and, after him, the Italian Father Gan- dolfo. For a short time Father Brandts administered the parish until the pastor's return, November 13th, 1836. The Catholic Directory for 1836 remarks in regard to Ste. Genevieve: "Sermon in French and German, and sometimes in English." On the 12th day of November, "post sex- ennium absolutum," the new Church was consecrated, by Bishop Rosati, assisted by a large concourse of priests. 7 The title to the church-property of Ste. Genevieve was restored to the parish in the days of Archbishop Kain. 370 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis Five months after this memorable event, June 25th, 1837, the Sisters of Loretto opened a Convent School for girls in the old Detchmendi Mansion. The community consisted of nine religious : Sister Agnes Ilartt was Superior. One of the nuns was Sister Catherine, formerly Odile Valle. The number of boarders in 1837 was twelve, of day-scholars forty-five. After a few years the school was placed in care of the Sisters of St. Joseph. There Avas also a school for boys under a lay-teacher. The priests of Ste. Genevieve, at that time, had in charge as stations : Ste. Annes' at Little Canada, Ste. Philomenas at Reviere aux Vases and St. Matthews on Establishment Creek. Later on when chapels were built at these places, the parish of Reviere aux Vases received the title St. Anthony, and the Establishment, now Bloomsdale, that of Ste. Philomena, which it still bears, whilst that of Reviere aux Vases has been changed to S. S. Philip and James. Father Dahmen remained in charge of Ste. Genevieve until 1840, when his Superiors recalled him to the Seminary. He was succeeded by Father Gandolfo, with the French Father Brands and the German Nicholas Stehle as assistants. German immigration was literally flooding the Counties of Ste. Genevieve and Perry and, in lesser degree, Cape Girardeau and Madison. "One hun- dred thousand Germans are expected, or are on the way to the United States," writes Father Gandolfo to his Superior in Paris, "one can scarcely form an idea of the multitude arriving daily. The German language is getting to be as necessary as English and French, and we need a priest here, who speaks the language. The few men we have are over-loaded with work. Mr. Huland, (Father Uhland) instructs the boys in the Little Seminary in German : I myself take German lessons from Father Stehle; but "durus est hie sermo. " s It was in Father Gandolfo 's day, July 17th, 1841, that the rock- church built by Father Dahmen was injured by lightning. The electric fluid struck the gable end and, descending along the roof to the sacristy, pierced the solid wall on its way and struck the frame of the picture of Ste. Genevieve without doing any harm to the painting itself, then descended to the altar, taking away its guilding, and passed to the ground floor. A pious parishioner, John Doyle, kneeling in prayer at the altar rail, was touched by the lightning-stroke and stunned, yet recovered from the shock. The new brick church was built long after, on the site, and partly on the very foundations of Father Dahmen 's rock structure. 9 s Draft of Father Gandolfo 's letter in the Archives of the Parish of Ste. Genevieve, Mo. 9 Rozier's, "History of the Early Settlement of the Mississippi Valley,'' p. 117. Chapter 18 CATHOLIC NEW MADRID After the death or departure of Father Gibault, Pastor of New Madrid and the Post of Arkansas, Father Maxwell of Ste. Genevieve was the only priest left, and to his charge fell all the parishes in the wide territory of Upper Louisiana, soon to be called Missouri. Then occurred that terrible visitation, the New Madrid earthquake, which agitated the country around the mouth of the Ohio from December 1811 to February, 1812, and which, as Senator Linn, of Missouri, wrote, "after shaking the valley of the Mississippi to its center, vibrated along the courses of the rivers and valleys, and passing the primitive mountain barriers, died away along the shores of the Atlantic." 1 Such an appalling phenomenon, which changed the course of rivers, submerged many of the higher pieces of land and elevated others that had been submerged before, drained many of the numerous lakes, and formed others, with bottoms deeper than the Mississippi, had a most discouraging effect on the progress of the settlement. Instead of gaining accessions, New Madrid was losing many of its inhabitants, and to accelerate the decline of the town the river threw the weight of its current against the higher ground on which New Madrid was built so as to constantly reduce its eastern limits and either wash away the habitations or drive them further West. The ancient site of New Madrid is now the channel of the Mississippi. Father Gibault 's church of St. Isidore, together with his residence and kitchen and bake house, were swallowed up by the mighty river. New Madrid seemed dead, at least spiritually, for about twenty years after Father Gibault 's death, without church or priest or the Holy sacrifice. But the people did not lose the faith, and a rivival of religion was preparing under the counsels of Divine Providence. But the Parish of St. Isidore was gone with its Spanish patron, and when the church of New Madrid emerged once more from its dark night into the broad light of history, it was under the new name of St. John the Baptist. It is neither a very interesting nor a very important account we have to offer in regard to the religious growth of the old river-town of New Madrid during the last hundred years. Political upheavals, destructive earthquakes, a sanguinary war with armies traversing the territory from south to north, from north to south, and chiefly the dearth of priestly help in the very extensive diocese of St. Louis, were 1 Cf. Eozier's History, pp. 109-208, and Houek, "History of Missouri,"' vol. I, p. 172. (371) 372 History of I In- Archdiocese of St. Louis the main causes of the slow development, often looking, for all the world, like a sad retrogression of Catholic life, in the city of New Madrid and vicinity. About three years after his arrival in the diocese, November 1820, Bishop Du Bourg wrote to Father Rosati from New Madrid : "I stopped here to see what condition Religion is in at this place. These poor people, in all sixty Catholic families, have been in the last twenty years without any religious assistance whatever, no marriages, no baptisms, no sacraments. Still they wish to have a priest ; but I do not think they have the means to support one ; neither do I believe that it would be good for a priest to stay here. Nevertheless, I deem it necessary that a missionary should come here three or four times a year. Mr. Robert McCoy, 2 at whose home I am now, will give him lodging and board ; he has a nice hall where Mass may be said. The congregation will give the Priest $70.00 every time he comes : he shall remain each time a fortnight to instruct, etc. I wish that Fr. Potini should undertake this mission. He may go first to Cape Girardeau to Mr. Steinbeck, whose family are Catholic, and will say Mass there for the few Catholics of that quarter. Thence he will go to Mr. Hopkins, 29 miles farther. He will fare very well there; Mr. Hopkins' family also are Catholic. From Mr. Hopkins' to New Madrid the distance is about 30 miles, and I am told the road is good all the way down. Father Potini should take along- whatever is needed for the celebration of Mass and the administration of the Sacraments. I think that at Cape Girardeau, they will also contribute their share of the expense for the priests' journey. He may begin as soon as possible. L. Wm. of La. On further reflection, I think Father Cellini will be more suitable for this mission than Father Potini, on account of his more mature age." 3 There is a slight mistake in this letter as to the length of time during which New Madrid was deprived of priest and altar. From a letter of Father Maxwell to Father Gibault at New Madrid it appears that the old missionary was still the pastor of New Madrid in October 1801. Louis Houck in his History of Missouri states that "until his death in 1802 he (Gibault) was active in all spiritual matters, and as priest of the parish received a regular salary from the government." Others give the year of Father Gibault 's death as 1804, which opinion seems, at least, probable. Besides, Father Maxwell from Ste. Genevieve and Father Lusson from St. Charles, visited the place after Father Gibault 's death: the 2 Kobert McCoy had been in the service of the Spanish Government, as Secretary of the Civil Administration. 3 Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese, Du Bourg 's letters. Catholic New Madrid 373 period of utter desolation, therefore, was considerably less than twenty years. Yet it was sufficiently long and dreary to bring on spiritual decay. In consequence of the Bishop's recommendation, not Father Potini, but Cellini was sent to New Madrid. On May 24, 1821, Father Rosati writes to Father Francis Baccari, Vicar General of the Congre- gation of the Missions in Rome as follows: "Father Cellini, besides the sick calls and confessions, has the charge and direction of the work here at home. Moreover, he has a parish of French people, amounting to 70 families, at New Madrid, on the Mississippi river, more than 100 miles from the Seminary. He goes there three or four times a year, and the trip takes him four or five weeks each time. Those poor people have had no priest for twenty years. You may well imagine in what condition they were. Ignorance cannot go any farther. It is morally a forest to frighten the stoutest heart. However, there are good dis- positions. Father Cellini went there for the first time during the month of March; he baptized there a great many people, even adult persons, and two Protestants ; he urged them to build a church, and in a short while, when that church is finished (it does not take long in this coun- try to build), he will go there again." 4 The church was not built at that time, and there is nothing to show that Father Cellini repeated his visit, except an obscure allusion to other visits in a letter of Father Cellini to Father Rosati, dated Oc- tober 22, 1821: "I have written to Mr. McCoy on the subject you men- tioned to me in your letter ; and I hope that when our Brothers arrive there, they will be assisted as we wish. ' ' 5 The McCoys were, no doubt, the family of Robert McCoy of New Madrid, with whom Bishop Du Bourg had made arrangements for fu- ture priestly services in 1820. By an acident, or rather a dispensation of Divine Providence, Mother Duchesne of blessed memory, the first Superior of the Ladies of the Sacred Heart, was to bless the sadly-forsaken place with her presence. Baunard-Fullerton gives the following account in The Life of Mother Duchesne : "On the return trip the "Cincinnati" ran aground on a sandbank opposite New Madrid, a hundred (nearly two hundred) miles from St. Louis. The river was so low that it was impossible to forsee when the boat could proceed — this delay and uncertainty were harassing! Mad. Duchesne . . . resolved to turn this interval to account by making her annual retreat ... A fortnight elapsed in this way, and then she re- ceived a pressing invitation from Catholics in the neighborhood, Mr. ■* Rosati to Baccari, Archives of Procurator-General of the Lazarists in Borne. 5 Cellini to Rosati, Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. 374 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis and Mrs. Kay, to come and stay in their house. Mad. Dchesne and Miss Pratte accordingly spent five days with these kind people." 6 The next visit made to New Madrid by Lazarist misionaries was that of Father John Mary Odin, just ordained, accompanied by the deacon John Timon, who was to rise, in the course of time, to the dignity of the first Bishop of Buffalo. The trip was made during September and October 1824. In their report the missionaries write: "After a three days' journey (from Jackson) we arrived at New Madrid. Our sojourn there was short, in spite of the great needs and the earnest prayers of the inhabitants, who have not had a resident priest among them for nearly twenty-five years." 7 Mentioning their return in his Diary, on October 31, 1824, Rosati writes: "One priest should be sent to New Madrid where he is much needed." And under date of December 1, 1824, the Diary of Rosati reads : "I have promised two men of New Madrid to send a priest to that city at the opening of the Spring of next year. (1825)." Some one must have been sent, for on April 12, 1825, Bishop Du Bourg writes to Rosati evidently in answer to some good and hopeful news communicated to him by Bishop Rosati : " I am much pleased with the dispositions manifested at New Madrid." From the Diary of Bishop Rosati it appears, that Father John M. Odin, CM., made another visit to New Madrid, this time in company of Father Leo DeNeckere, also a future bishop of New Orleans. Under date of April 3, 1826, he writes: "I have sent De Neckere and Odin to New Madrid to remain there until Pentecost." And on April 17: "Through the courtesy of Mr. McCoy I have received a letter from Mr. Odin, whom I had sent to New Madrid on the 3d with Mr. De Neckere. On April 4th, De Neckere preached a sermon at the town of Jackson, having been very kindly received by the people of that place, among whom there were some few Catholic families." And again, on May 20th, he records the return of De Neckere and Odin to the Seminary from New Madrid: "There (at New Madrid) they endeavored to instruct the people (about eighty families) who had for many years been deprived of all spiritual help, by giving Catechetical instructions twice a day, and two sermons on each Sunday and Feast-day. On As- cension day they gave First Holy Communion to fifteen boys and girls. The number of communions would have been much larger, if the inhabitants of the country had not been prevented from attending by frequent and heavy rains, which caused an inundation, and by ur- gent labors on the farms. They gave Baptism to more than fifty in- 6 L. Cit., cf . Erskine, p. 259. i "Annates de la Propagation de la Foi, " vol. II, p. 380. Catholic New Madrid 375 fants. Being now fully convinced of obtaining a resident priest the people of New Madrid have decided to erect a church-building, for which purpose they have started a subscription and have already raised five hundred dollars. It is a pity that such a dire spiritual need con- nected with so much good will could not at once find relief." 8 Still a number of years had to pass before New Madrid was again to have a church and a priest of its own. But Fathers Odin and Timon were to return to New Madrid once more; Timon having been ordained priest on the 24th of September, 1826. Bishop Rosati's Diary tells us that Odin and Timon started for New Madrid on October 1st. On the 12th of October (1826) the Bishop writes to Odin at New Madrid: "Father Niel has already seven priests for this country. We will have wherewith to have someone at New Madrid.'" 9 On October 19th, Rosati received letters from Timon and Odin who were still at New Madrid. On October 20th, the Bishop wrote to Odin : "The news that you and Father Timon sent us, caused us much gratification. You may assure those gentlemen that they will not be deprived of the visits of the priests, and that, as far as possible, we shall send them the same. The next visit may take place in the be- ginning of January, vita comite. " On October 31st, both missionaries are at the Seminary once more. Bishop Rosati remarks that they had endeavored to excite the people of New Madrid to the proper spirit of gaining the indulgence of the Jubilee. Their success was marked by more than sixty confessions, forty holy communions, and a number of baptisms. ' ' 10 Whether the promised visit was made in Spring of 1827, we can- not say, as Bishop Rosati, at that time, was absent in Kentucky. In searching the Archives for a document concerning Father Lewis Tucker, we found a weatherbeaten paper of great importance for our present purpose, the Report of Father John Timon, CM., concerning New Madrid and the Post of Arkansas for 1830. It is addressed to Bishop Rosati and dated December 4, 1830 : "I can send, You, Monsigneur, but very imperfect accounts of New Madrid and Arkansas. The length of time has effaced much from my memory, and I cannot now lay my hands on my notes. What I can recollect is that at New Madrid there are about 90 Catholic families, almost all Creole French, and all in utmost want of instruction, ignorant but attached to their religion. During the last five years about eighty « Rosati, Diary, passim. 9 Father Niel was sent abroad to collect funds and engage missionaries for the Diocese of St. Louis. In 1845 he published, at Paris, "La Voie Du Salut. " lo Diary of Rosati, passim. 376 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis persons received the Holy Communion, about one hundred and twenty went to confession, and a great many children, both of Catholic and Protestant parents, were baptized, as were also about eight adults. Be- fore the visit Mr. Odin made to them, they had not a priest, save on a passing visit, for many years, and now they are without one these three years. New Madrid is one of the oldest posts of Louisiana; it had its Commandant in the times of the French and Spanish domination, and a church which has been swallowed up by the river. The ancient site, by the encroachments of the Mississippi, is now a quarter of a mile from the shore of the river. The inhabitants lately made a sub- scription for building a new church, about $650.00 were subscribed, but they seem little inclined to begin, until they can have assurance of a clergyman. All professions desire that one might be sent. They would also wish that the priest might superintend a school ; and that, if possible, some nuns might be sent for the instruction of female children, I do not know any point, where, as I think, after some privations and sacrifices in the beginning, a good school or college might be more advantageously placed." 11 Father Timon's suggestion was favorably received by the Bishop but could not be carried out until two years had elapsed. Now, two young and energetic men were detached for the upbuilding of New Madrid. On April 27th, 1832, Rev. Victor Paillason departed for that place from Kaskaskia, where he had been pastor since December 22, 1830, in company with the newly ordained Peter Paul Lefevere as assistant. On October 13, 1832, Bishop Rosati had given the Sisters of Loretto permission to found a monastery and school of their order at New Madrid. Father Paillasson entered upon this laborious task with great zeal and energy. But on the 29th of June he came to St. Louis with the sad news that the house he had almost completed was destroyed by fire. The particulars of this undertaking and failure we learn from a letter of the youthful Peter Paul Lefevere to his Bishop : "You are undoubtedly already informed of the great misfortune that happened to us on the eve of Corpus Christi by the combustion of our house which was already nearly completed. At that dreadful event, struck with sadness and grief, we both thought immediately to abandon our post, and to return to St. Louis; but seeing the apparent anxiety and activity of the people to renew what we had undertaken, Mr. Paillason found it expedient that he alone should go up in order to in- form you of the sad and serious condition to which this misfortune has brought us, and to know what there should now be done. As he seems u Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. Catholic New Madrid 377 to have more courage than I, and to show a kind of punctilio to re- commence the establishment : I write these lines by his instigation to expose to you my depression, and also the embarrassment and grief which might cause too dangerous an engagement. You know Most Reverend Sir, that in the prospectus he has given of this establishment, he has expressly specified and determined, that it would be erected and directed on the same plan as that in the Barrens, and also that there would be erected a convent of nuns for the purpose of keeping a female school. Besides, he has expressly given notice that in both of these Seminaries or Academies, as they call them here, no mention would ever be made of Religion, or of whatever regards the Catholic doctrine and worship. Now the people, seeing the loss of so great an improvement and benefit for this place, offer willingly to subscribe for the rebuilding of that Seminary. We, after a sufficient inquiry and information, find that the building, in the manner the people desire and will have it, would cost, at least, from nine hundred to a thousand dollars, making deduction of all superfluities and considering the building as rough and simple as possible ; and the sum of the subscriptions, calculating at large, could only amount to five hundred dollars. So that we would run into debt four or five hundred dollars. Moreover, being once engaged, we would incur debts upon debts ; later, for the convent and after that, for the church. You conceive very well that this could never be paid with the revenue of the school, which, I am sure, will never exceed the expense of our corporal sustenance. "Besides you know very well that the school we would be able to teach could and Avould never be able to satisfy the idea and expectation of the people ; which, since our arrival, they have continually kept up and increased, thinking to establish and erect themselves upon the ruins of the Barrens. So, considering the little prospect and hope of future progress in the propagation of faith, knowing the inconstancy of the people, and that their only motive and intent is their temporal in- terest, having no money in cash, I shall never venture to engage myself for one dollar, under the obligation of paying it with the revenue of a precarious school. Because, Most Rev. Sir, knowing the dreadful situation of many priests of America merely on account of debts, I dread them more than death itself, and would prefer to cultivate the land from morning till evening rather than entangle myself so far. It would also be very painful to me to depend upon the whim of the people, for a worldly subsistence, because they would have subscribed for the house, without having ever the consolation of seeing any conversion to God, and even without having any time of working for my own salvation. Till now we never said Mass in public, but always privately, and even missed it often ourselves on account of manual labor. AVe preached 378 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis about six times in the court house, where the people assembled merely to see one anotber for amusement and pass-time, as they say it them- selves. You see that the present and future consolation either temporal or spiritual, is very small, and besides our characters differ in many points, one from another. If, therefore, you could apply some remedy to my present situation which is lamentable, or assign me some place, where by means of a frugal sustenance, I could work with more fruit for the salvation of others and that of myself, which is the only motive that brought me to America, you would infinitely oblige. Your most humble servant." 12 Bishop Rosati requested Father Lefevere to stay at New Madrid until Father Paillasson's return from the Post of Arkansas, whither he had been sent. Then on August 29, 1832, Lefevere was appointed to the mission of Salt River in Northeastern Missouri, to do valiant work for holy Church and to become in due time Bishop and Administrator of Detroit. Father Victor Paillasson continued his ministrations at New Madrid until 1836, when he entered the Novitiate of the Society of Jesus at Florissant, May 18th. After a brief interval Father Paillasson found a successor in the person of the newly ordained Ambrose Heim. Being born at Rodalbe in the diocese of Nancy in 1807, Father Heim came to St. Louis June 15th, 1833, and was raised to the priesthood July 23rd, 1837, by Bishop Rosati in the chapel of St. Mary's of the Barrens. Immediately after his ordination the youthful priest became pastor of New Madrid, and remained there until 1841. Father Heim built a church of wood and dedicated it in honor of St. John Baptist. This was the second church- building after Father Gibault's church of St. Isidore had been washed away by the river in 1816. Father Heim became pastor of Prairie du Long, and in 1843 chaplain of the Sisters of the Visitation at Kaskaskia, and in 1847 Secretary to the Bishop. Father Heim was the First Spiri- tual Director of the first Conference of St. Vincent de Paul in the United States. 13 12 Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. 13 Sehulte, Rev. Paul, ' ' The Old Cathedral Conference of St. Vincent de Paul So- ciety, " in " St. Louis Catholic Historical Review, ' ' vol. Ill, pp. 5-14. OC X f. if. Chapter 19 ST. MARY'S OF THE BARRENS UNDER FATHER TORNATORE The Seminar}- of St. Mary's at the Barrens had been under the rectorship of Father Rosati from the time of its foundation and re- mained so even after Rosati 's election to the Coadjutorship : x but when he became Bishop of St. Louis in his own right and Administrator of New Orleans, this burden, as well as the Superiorship of the entire congregation in America, was felt as a hindrance to all efficient work as Bishop, Superior and Rector. But where shall he find a substitute as Seminary director? He applied to his Superior at Rome; for the American Congregation of the Mission was- still a part of the Roman Province. In 1827, Bishop Rosati was gladdened by the news that Father Angelo Boccardo, a distinguished member of the Congregation of the Mission, was on his way to the Barrens to take the position of Superior. In order to make his advent a most joyful event, Father Baccari had intrusted to his care two-thousand francs, partly granted by the Society for the Propagation of the Faith, partly donated by private individuals, and by Father Baccari himself, all to be delivered to Bishop Rosati for the use of his missions. But, on July 27th, 1827, the sad news was brought from New Orleans, that Father Boccardo had accidentally dropped the package that contained the money and also a number of letters, into the swirling waves of the Mississippi. But worse still; Father Boccardo, weakened by the hardships of the long voyage, Avas shocked so dreadfully by the accident, that he in his anguish and dread, determined to return to Italy with the next ship. Nothing could shake his resolution, and so they had to let him depart. In writing to Cardinal Cappellari about this double loss, Bishop Rosati reminded him, that he, as Bishop of one See and Administrator of another, really could not perform the duties of a Superior of the Lazarists, and begged him to send back to him the good Father Boccardo, whom he could use so very advantageously at the Barrens. But, Father Boccardo never returned, and the heavily burdened Bishop continued his gentle importunities. 2 i Propaganda and the Vicar-General C. M., had stipulated that Rosati "must remain Superior of the House and Seminary over there, and head of the whole mis- sion in America." Cf. "Catholic Historical Review," III, p. 171. 2 Rosati to Cardinal Cappellari, July 27, 1827, rough draft in Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. (379) 380 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis Father John B. Tornatore, the one time professor of Dogmatic Theology as successor to Father De Andreis, and now Assistant to the Vicar General at Monte Citorio, seemed the proper person. Father Baccari intended Father Tornatore for other important work, and would not grant Bishop Rosati's request: At last, a very urgent letter to the Superior General at Paris elicited the order that Father Tornatore should be sent to America. Great was Bishop Rosati's joy when in April 1830, the long-desired Father arrived in New Orleans. Having assisted at the consecration of Bishop De Neckere, the new Superior assumed control of the house at the Barrens in the early part of July, and was appointed Visitor, (January 6, 1831) and also Vicar General of the diocese of St. Louis. There were at the Barrens four priests, Odin, Paquin, Timon and Brands, who had charge of a College with more than one hundred boys, and a number of Seminarians. The College was the main support of the entire establishment. As Father Shaw tells us: "The 'Barrens' of that far-off time boasted a log church, poor, small and crude. The Home of the Missionaries was likewise poor and incommodious. They themselves, with hands unused to such labor, felled trees and hewed them into logs wherewith to fashion their first home. The record of those days spells toil and trial and much resignation. They fared fru- gally, went scantily clad, and endured with extreme difficulty the rigors of the climate, unused as they were to extremes of heat and cold. "Steps were soon taken to build a larger and better church. They designed to build a replica of the Lazarist church in Rome. Only when confronted with overwhelming odds did they consent to narrow the dimensions of the original plans. The corner stone was laid in 1827. Work progressed slowly and funds were meager. ' ' 3 Father Tornatore entered upon his new duties with right good will. The four priests were with him, heart and soul. But among the brothers dissatisfaction was rife. Complaint after complaint, accusa- tion after accusation, flew to Rome, all clothed in, the garb of piety and zeal for the glory of God. The rigor of the climate, the barrenness of the land, the multiplicity of occupations, were only the reasoning of the great accusation that the observance of the Rule was made impossible by the presence of seminarians and college boys in the same house. Some of the priests insisted on Father Baccari 's order that all members of the Congregation should be withdrawn from the parishes, a measure that would have ruined the prospects of the diocese for many years. All were for getting rid of the College, which they said, was the business of the Jesuits, and not of the Lazarist Community. Indeed, 3 Shaw, T. M., "Our Lady of the Assumption. St. Mary's of the Barrens Under Father Tornatore 381 they would have closed the Seminary at the Barrens and transferred it to Lower Louisiana, where under a milder climate and with greater facilities it would be possible to work for the glory of God and the good of souls. Father Rosati, during his rectorship, had experienced this secret opposition. Father Cellini seems to have been one of the chief fomentors of trouble. "As to the observance of the Rule," Bishop Rosati wrote in 1828, "I have tried my very best and I think I have succeeded. Our priests who live here in community are rather over-zealous than negligent. It it difficult to satisfy the brothers. Cellini is not built for community life ; he should not come back to us. ' ' Father Tornatore met the same difficulties with much less power of resistance, than Bishop Rosati had displayed. He was not gifted as a speaker, he never did acquire the idiomatic use of English, his health was precarious. Yet he made use of his authority. He gave orders to the priests employed in parochial work to repair to the Seminary. Not one of the five obeyed him. With the brothers he had recourse to reproofs and penance, and even the denial of the sacraments, but all to no avail. Within one year after he had assumed the reins of govern- ment, no fewer than nine subjects had left the community. Though there was no priest among the recalcitrants, the loss was a serious one. Father Baccari ordered that the Seminarians be kept separate from the College boys : Father Tornatore claimed that this was impossible, as some of the seminarians had to be employed as teachers of College classes, others as prefects, others as infirmarians. The Seminarians were needed in the College, the College was needed for the support of the community. An old grievance in regard to the presence in the kitchen of female negro slaves, which had been remedied long ago, still lingered in the mind of the Roman authorities. Father Tornatore brushed aside the old spiderweb and proceeded to enlighten his Superior on the real condition of things in America: "Now in regard to the observance of the Rule, here is our order of the day: At 4:30 rising for us of the congregation (The Seminarians and College boys get up at 5:00). At five, meditation in the chapel. At six Community Mass; mass is said at the same time at the College. At 7 :30 breakfast in common for Seminarians, College boys and those of us who care to have any ; Fifteen minutes are allowed for this meal, which is taken in silence and during which there is reading. After breakfast, fifteen minutes of recreation in silence. This practice I found when I came here : it had been introduced by Bishop Rosati ; and accordingly I have maintained it. After this recreation, that is, at 8 o'clock all are occupied, the ones to teach school, others to study, 382 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis the others to various employments, the College boys being' apart from the Seminarians,. At twelve, particular examen and dinner in silence, during which there is always reading, and, after dinner our customary recreation. There is no siesta, but spiritual reading for Seminarians in the Seminary and for the boys in College. Then study and class for Seminarians and College boys until four. At four, Seminarians and College boys are given half an hour of recreation, after which they are occupied in their respective duties until 7:15 at which time there is particular examen. Supper as usual, and recreation which the Sem- inarians take in the Seminary, and the boys in the College, under the Supervision of their Director Father Paquin. Besides, we have for us members of the Community, the Conference on Tuesday; and on Sunday, all assist at the explanation of the Gospel at high Mass, and the same is to be said of other spiritual exercises. Regarding food and clothing, no one is wanting anything: all are provided both in health and sickness. Now would Your Reverence please tell me whether in all this there is anything out of order, whether there is anything to add or suppress ; if there is, it will be done with the fullest submission and alacrity. ' ' 4 Whether these explanations were considered satisfactory or not by Father Baccari, they were quickly followed by a notification to the writer that a successor would be given him ere long. Father Torna- tore accepted in all submission his removal from office, awaiting only his successor's letter of appointment. 5 The death of Father Baccari intervening, Father Tornatore was continued in the office of Superior. Even the erection of America as an independent Province of the Order with Father Timon as Visitor, did not change the status of Father Tornatore as Superior of the Barrens. Better days were in store for the Community, the departure of the malcontents proving a blessing in disguise. The Institute began to flourish once more, the number of priests rose to fifteen, with five students of theology and eight novices. Concord now reigned among the brothers, working for the cause of God under the direction of obedience. It was under Father Tornatore 's administration that the construction of the Seminary Church was finally completed, and its solemn consecration held by Bishop Rosati, October 29th, 1837. Father Odin had in the meantime journeyed to Europe to solicit alms from the wealth of the old world to speed the upbuilding of the Seminary Church. 4 Tornatore to Baccari, April 18, 1833. 5 Tornatore to Baccari, November 1834. St. Mary's of the Barrens Under Father Tornatore 383 The danger to the Seminary, however, was not as yet completely removed. In 1836, Father Nozo, the Superior General of the Lazarists issued a decree, suppressing the College at the Barrens and demand- ing a payment of 600 francs from the Bishop for every Seminary student's board and tuition: Another decree recalled all the Lazarist priests from parochial work, and ordered them to live in community. Under date of March 4, 1836, the Diary of Bishop Rosati has the following entry : "I answered the Rev. D. Nozo, the Superior General of the Con- gregation of the Mission, and proved with plain evidences, that the decrees concerning the House of the Congregation in my diocese had been made inconsiderately, and that I could not possibly give my assent to the proposed suppression of the College of St. Mary's and the annual payment of 600 francs for every clerical student : but, that I did consent to the measure of recalling all the priests (of the Congregation) who are now in the Parishes of the Diocese, to Community life. I asked him that the Seminary and College be left in their present condition, and that another Seminary be erected in St. Louis, and still another in New Orleans according to the request of the Illustrious and Most Reverend Mr. Blanc." 6 What came of these wishes and plans must be reserved as subject matter for a future chapter. The consecration of the Seminary Church of St. Mary's calls for our attention. The Catholic Telegraph of Cin- cinnati, November 30, 1837, brought the minute account of the great event by an eyewitness ; from which we have extracted the following particulars : "The ceremony of the consecration of this beautiful church, the corner stone of which was laid on the 6th of January, 1827, took place on the 9th of October, (1837). The building is of stone and is 124 feet long and 64 wide. The front is of dressed stone, as well as the two towers at the corners. Over the door is an inscription in letters of gold, 'The Lord is in His holy Temple: let all the earth keep silence be- fore Him.' The whole front is a lasting memorial of the devotedness and perseverance of the venerable Angelo Oliva, one of the Brothers of the Congregation of the Missions, who died about two years ago. Al- though occupied alone in cutting the stone for this church and super- intending its erection, this excellent man found time to contribute a considerable portion of his labour to the churches of St. Louis and St. Genevieve. The interior of the church is of the Tuscan Order. The grand altar at the extremity is of stone, elegantly painted in representation of green 6 Rosati 's Diary, March 4, 1836. :>S4 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis marble, the mouldings and front being beautifully gilt. At each side of the nave are three altars, one larger in the centre chapel and two smaller ones adjoining it. The sanctuary is 30 feet square under a dome 45 feet in height ; there is a small gallery on each side of the sanctuary, in one of which is the organ, and a large one over the principal entrance of the church. Two capacious sacristies are entered from the sanctuary by lateral doors. The consecration commenced at 7 o'clock in the morning. After the blessing of the exterior, the Bishop and his numerous clergy entered the church and, the doors being closed and the people excluded during a considerable portion of the ceremony, one of the Reverend Gentlemen explained the ceremonies before the grand entrance. He entered into a minute detail of the rites they had assembled to witness, and concluded by vindicating the use of ceremonies, in general, and proving the an- tiquity of those by which churches are dedicated to Almighty God. The Bishop and clergy then proceeded from the church to the chapel of the Seminary, to transport the relics which were to be placed in the great altar. These relics were placed in a shrine under a richly decorated canopy, and were borne upon the shoulders of four priest clad in chasubles. On returning to the church the procession with the relics passed around the Church and then enter- ing the main door proceeded to the altar near which the relics were deposited. The venerable Bishop of Vincennes, who, at the invitation of the Superior, had come to assist at the ceremony, accompanied the procession. His delicate state of health did not permit him to be present at the commencement of the ceremony. The aged and pious, Mr. Olivier, one of the devoted pioneers of the West, and now in his 91st year, was also present, and contributed by his very appearance to inspire the assembled multitude with devotion and recollection. After the great altar was consecrated, by our Right Rev. Bishop with all the dignity and fidelity to the Roman Pontifical for which he is distinguished, the Pontifical Mass was celebrated, and the whole concluded at about half past two. At half past four the same Right Rev. Prelate celebrated the Pontifical Vespers. There were present on the occasion forty-one clergymen, including seventeen priests, four deacons, three subdeacons and the seminarians and novices of the Congregation of the Missions. It is not in the language of exaggeration we speak when we say that with the exception of the consecration of the Cathedral of St. Louis, a more imposing and truly religions spectacle has not been witnessed in the Western Country. The church itself may compare with, in point of architecture, if it does not surpass, any other religious edifice in the St. Mary's of the Barrens Under Father Tornatore 385 United States; and a visitor from our Eastern cities, if suddenly trans- ported to it, could scarcely believe that he was in the Barrens of Missouri. ' ' T Father Tornatore was overjoyed at the completion of the church after a decade's hard struggle and patient waiting. 8 He attended two Provincial Councils at Baltimore (1843 and 1846) as theologian of Bishop Kenrick, who had a high regard for his learning and piety. He died at the Barrens February 20th, 1864, in his 81st year, and was buried in the Community Cemetery at the Barrens. Many are the relics preserved here. But the greatest treasure this church possesses is the body of the saintly Father Felix De Andreis, which was reinterred in September 1837, on the gospel side of the chapel of St. Vincent, directly beneath the pavement. i St. Louis, at the time, had no Catholic paper; hence the report was sent to Cincinnati for publication. 8 Father Tornatore in his transport of joy, wrote a month after to Father Ugo, in Rome: "The service lasted 7% hours. Some 40 Ecclesiastics were present; during all the time of the function, which is beautiful and devotion-inspiring, there was singing. A large crowd of people were present, both Catholic and Protestant, and all were astonished and edified. Our church is quite piety-inspiring. No one enters, be he Catholic or Protestant, who does not feel like saying: This is truly God's house; and this is a great boon for religion and the cause of the conversion of many heretics, who never experienced in their meeting-houses such a sweetness of feeling as they experience when they come to our church and assist at the sacred functions, which, thanks be to God, are carried out there with great accuracy and devotion. ' ' Vol. 1—13 Chapter 20 BISHOP DU BOURG AND THE COADJUTORSHIP The strangest and most complicated event of Bishop Du Bourg's Episcopate is the series of negotiations with Rome for the appointment of a coadjutor for the diocese of Louisiana. That the immense diocese could not be properly administered by one man, was plain to everybody concerned. Rome would, no doubt, have gladly consented to any proper appointment. But the Louisiana prelate had several minor considerations in view, and proved so vacillating a petitioner, that the Propaganda, at last, resorted to measures of its own. The first candidate proposed by Bishop Du Bourg for episcopal honors, though not for the coadjustorship, was his old enemy, the "inimicus homo" of former days, Father Antonio de Sedella. This was early in 1819. The unhappy dissensions in the church of New Orleans, once fostered by Father Sedella, were gradually being com- posed. "In order to promote and hasten such a great work," wrote the prelate to the Cardinal Prefect, "I requested Father Anthony de Sedella be elevated to the episcopal dignity with the title in partibus, as my assistant, suppressing however, the right of succession. Through this I judged that the estranged sheep might be more easily brought back to the obedience and love of their Shepherd, and that all might gradually coalesce in one mind. "According to subsequent communications the work of pacification progresses more happily from day to day. For when Father Anthony noticed that the trustees of his church, formerly most inimical to me, were now, through the influence mainly of my very dear friend, the Reverend Mr. Martial, greatly inclined to my side, he sent me a letter, full of submissiveness and reverence, and after that showed himself intent in correcting the abuses against which I had frequently protested in vain." 1 "Having, therefore, received the above mentioned profession of Father Anthony, I sent him the decree of suspension of his vicar, and he, as well as the trustees, yielded immediate obedience, and also most earnestly requested that I appoint, as soon as possible, three of my best 1 Souvay, Dr. Charles, L., "Correspondence of Bishop Du Bourg with Propa- ganda," gives all the documents on the matter preserved in the Archives of the Propaganda, America Centrale, and in the Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. The correspondence was printed in "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review, " vol. I, p. 73, vol. Ill, 223, passim. 1. c. vol. I, p. 194. (386) Bishop Du Bourg and the Coadjutorship 387 priests as vicars of his church, which I did: I even constituted one of them, the Reverend Mr. Joseph Moni, of Bologna, a man of lovable character and truly sacerdotal discretion, who, whilst holding for a time the place of Vicar General of New Orleans, had completely captivated the mind of Father Anthony, as his assistant with the right of succession. The peace and government of that church being thus established, I think there is nothing to prevent you offering the mitre to Father Anthony as a sign of approbation and a means of confirming him with a new bond of union. Moreover, as after such a long vacancy, after such deplorable quarrels, after so many denunciations directed against their actual bishop and even against the Roman See, the in- habitants not only do not feel the need of a bishop, but even show themselves disinclined to receiving any bishop, no one appears to me more suitable, than the Father Anthony to conciliate and gradually accustom the minds of men to the episcopal dignity and the authority of the Sovereign Pontiff. The way being thus paved by him, any prudent man will, after his death, with little trouble take his place. I therefore ask you again and again that, unless it seems otherwise to Your Eminence and the Sacred Congregation, the Brief of his election as bishop in partibus, be sent." 2 In order that this appointment of a man of doubtful character do as little harm as possible, the Bishop requested, that the new Bishop should have only delegated authority in the diocese. But, as Du Bourg continues: "in this manner the danger of schism will be effectively met, yet the needs of the diocese, both present and future, will not yet be sufficiently provided for. I would not have Your Eminence forget : 1 ) that this diocese is the most important one of all North America, not only on account of its well-known extension, running, as it does three thousand miles in length, but also on account of the multitude of Cath- olics, who compose by far the greater number of inhabitants; 2) that the religious condition has greatly deteriorated through the long inter- ruption of the episcopal succession, the paucity of priests, and what is even worse, the bad example of many, and other local circumstances. Its extension brings it about that, with my increasing infirmities, I cannot without greatest detriment to my salvation, and danger to my life, visit the more remote parts of my diocese. And therefore a great number of the faithful are deprived of Confirmation, the priests lack the supervision and counsel of their bishop ; the old abuses continue, and new ones spring up every day. And if the hope of a coming better age has already risen, and as the work of reform is just beginning, it will certainly be levelled to the ground once more, if the exercise of episcopal solicitude should cease for a few months. 3 2 Souv.-iv, op. cit., vol. T, p. 194. 3 Ibidem, p. 195. 388 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis "Neither of these will be remedied by the promotion of Father Anthony; for he would neither, on account of his advanced age, be able to go out beyond the limits of the city, nor would he, on account of his deficiency of learning and the sad memories of the past, be able to administer the diocese. It would, therefore, be expedient in my judgment that, besides him, another be given me as a real coadjutor, with the right of succession, who being endowed with virtue, learning, and vigor of mind and body, might be capable, not only of assisting my weakness, but also of seizing the reins of Government in case I should be prematurely taken away. I fear, indeed, that my supplication may seem exorbitant to the Sacred Congregation, as the case of two titular bishops being given to help one ordinary, if there be any at all, must be very rare indeed. But I would ask the Most Eminent Fathers to consider that to extraordinary evils extraordinary remedies are usually applied." "If the Sacred Congregation should accept my judgment, no one would appear more worthy to receive this sacred dignity, than the Reverend D. Joseph Rosati, a Neapolitan, a most distinguished priest of the Congregation of the Missions, about thirty years of age. He is wanting in nothing that would enable him to gain the reverence and the love of all : Virtue, especially prudence beyond his age, copious learning, a burning zeal for souls, resourceful eloquence, singular modesty, a venerable gravity of appearance, and an untiring strength of body. But as it is to be feared that he might, through his great lack of confidence in himself, refuse the proffered honor, I believe that force should be applied to his modesty and the command should be added to the appointment so, that all occasions for dangerous procrastination might be removed." 4 The Bishop quickly realized that he had made a serious blunder in requesting the appointment of Father Sedella, and hastened to retract it. But this was a difficult and dangerous matter, as it had been bruited about in New Orleans that the request for Sedella 's appoint- ment had been urged at Rome. "The only means I can think of to settle matters," writes the Bishop in his anguish to the Cardinal Prefect, "is that Your Eminence oppose in the Sacred Congregation this appointment on account of the age of the person, and have an official letter sent me with the remark that, no matter how great the merit of this religious might be, his ad- vanced age would preclude the hope of his surviving me, and the expectation of his being of assistance to me in my travels ; that, there- fore, it would be against the spirit of the Church to appoint him as my 4 Souvay, op. cit., pp. 195 and 196. Bishop Dn Bourg and the Coadjutorship 389 coadjutor; furthermore, that the partition of my diocese would be a premature measure." 5 "In consequence it will be advisable to postpone, for a time, the appointment of Rev. Mr. Eosati, whom I have already proposed for the Coadjutorship and, above all, not to mention it in the aforesaid letter. I ask Your Eminence's pardon for my inconsistency, and my precipitation in such an important affair. But I beseech you by the love of religion to support my views, if you take any interest in the progress of the faith in this poor country, and in the consolation of this poor bishop, whom his sorrows, would long since have brought to the grave, had not God sustained him." 6 The friends and supporters of Bishop Du Bourg, hearing of his precipitate action, were surprised and hurt. Father Rosati was their choice, and Sedella's candidacy was regarded as preposterous. Father Martial, the admired of Sedella and Du Bourg alike, sums up the feelings of the clergy in Lower Louisiana in a letter to a friend at the French Embassy in Rome ; "It is likewise necessary that they should know in Rome that the wish of all the Missionaries in Louisiana is that Father Rosati be made Coadjutor : his wisdom, enlightenment, virtues and pru- dence fit him pre-eminently for that office. What a disregard of all proprieties, not to say more, in presenting at one time Father Anthony, a Capuchin Monk, Rector of the Church in New Orleans, and a man who caused so much disturbance, and whose wily polity succeeded in keeping away the lawful Ecclesiastical Superior." 7 On June 25th, Bishop Du Bourg proposed to Cardinal Litta another solution of the whole matter: "I asked Your Eminence to lock up this whole affair in your bosom, to let no one near or far suspect that I withdrew my petition, and to command me to designate another subject who would be younger and more active. I had, however, already pro- posed one in the person of Mr. Rosati to be my veritable Coadjutor, not imagining that I would ever think of giving that title to Father Anthony. But I have just received news which changes once more all my batteries and at last opens to me a door of escape from this labyrinth, whilst securing the welfare of the diocese. For five years I had at New Orleans, in the person of Mr. Sibourd, a vicar general who, by his prudence and great virtues, won the esteem of all, even of my enemies. The fortitude with which he devoted himself to his dan- gerous and disagreeable post, his many qualities which enabled him to fill it well, induced me at an early date to take him in consideration as my Coadjutor, when God, who, to try us, seems to play with our apparently best concerted plans, sent him an illness which forced him 5 Souvay, op. cit., p. 302. 6 Ibidem, p. 302. » Souvay, op. cit., p. 302. Note 5. 390 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis to leave the country without hope of return. Now since the Good God has made the worthy man well and, against all expectations, even his own, has led him back to us under these painful circumstances, I have no doubt, but that he is the person upon whom He wants this dignity to fall. He is more fit for it than anyone else, by his age, which is equally distant from the two extremes, as well as by his experience, and his long services in the administration, as also by the general esteem and consideration by which he is surrounded ; I therefore write to the Sacred Congregation a Latin Letter (which I ask Your Eminence to read with particular attention) in which, whilst keeping absolute silence about Father Anthony, I ask to substitute Mr. Sibourd for Mr. Rosati. I beg Your Eminence, in conformity with my last letter, to address to me a communication which I may show, written by Yourself, from which it appears that I have made a petition for this Religious, but that His Holiness, on account of the great age of the subject, has not thought proper to grant it, and that, to avoid delay, having heard from the Sacred Congregation of the merits of my Vicar General Mr. Sibourd, He has designed, Motu proprio, to confer upon him the dignity which I had solicited for Father Anthony." 8 On June 25th, Bishop Du Bourg returns to the charge in favor of Father Sibourd as his coadjutor, giving a reason also for his with- drawal of the name of Father Rosati : Alluding to his former letters to Propaganda the Bishop writes: "I presumed to designate the Reverend Joseph Rosati, a priest of the Congregation of the Missions, in whom I said nothing is wanting, except, possibly the proper age, to bear worth- ily this formidable burden. However, I should not have brought him forth, if I had had the least hope, that my \ T icar-General, Rev. Louis Sibourd who, suffering from some illness a few months since, was forced to leave New Orleans for foreign parts, should ever return. For I have no priest to whom I am bound by a stronger claim ; I know none, who enjoys among all, the laity as well as the clergy, a higher esteem for prudence and holiness of life, and who has acquired a fuller knowl- edge of the diocese. "As he now, against the expection of all, has returned well and strong, with the intention of remaining in New Orleans until his end, I would recall the former designation, and ask most humbly, that the above-mentioned Rev. Louis Sibourd, a priest of the diocese of Embrun, later parish priest in the Island of San Domingo, and during the last five years Vicar General of this diocese, a man, though burdened with a number of years, yet not too far advanced in age, nor broken by infirmities, be given to me as Coadjutor, with the right of succession. To the other things that speak for him, this fact may be added, a fact making his appointment so desirable in the present state of the diocese, s Souvay, op. cit., p. 306. Bishop Du Bourg and the Coadjutorship 391 namely that he enjoys sufficient income, to serve almost at his own expense. Lastly, that the Rev. Joseph Rosati, whose Congregation is not yet firmly established in the diocese, cannot without grave detriment be separated from it so soon, as he is the main-stay thereof." 9 Being asked by the Congregation of the Propaganda to propose some other priest, not older than himself, besides Vicar General Louis Sibourd, Bishop Du Bourg submitted the names of Fathers Bertrand Martial from Bordeaux, and Joseph Rosati, both men of genuine piety, remarkable power of mind and manners. But, "as the Rev. B. Martial and the Rev. J. Rosati have undertaken under my auspices, the one the foundation of a college for the religious and literary education of boys in Lower Louisiana, and the other that of an Ecclesiastical Seminary in Upper Louisiana, these works which are, I shall not say very useful, but really necessary above all others, will fatally crumble down, if these two gentlemen are taken away. There remains, therefore, but one candidate to whom the Coadjutorship may be given without grave inconvenience, namely, the Rev. Louis Sibourd. The fact that he is a few years my senior does not seem really to be in the way : first, because his vigor and his virtue are in proportion to his years ; secondly and mainly, because, as the principal reason for giving me a Coadjutor is that the minds in Lower Louisiana may gradually grow reconciled with the government of the Bishop, it is of the utmost importance to select a man with whom they are already quite accustomed." 10 As the age of Father Sibourd seemed to militate against his chances, Bishop Du Bourg in his next communication substituted the name of Father De Andreis for that of Sibourd adding, however, that De An- dreis and Rosati were indispensible for the establishment of their community, as Martial was for the College he had founded in Lower Louisiana. When the question of dividing the diocese arose once more, the Bishop strongly disadvised such a step for the present. "Lower and Upper Louisiana are so necessary to each other, that if they be separated, the later could not get temporal, and the other spiritual help. The Episcopal mensa, and the support of the seminary are somehow supplied by Lower Louisiana ; from Upper Louisiana alone can priests be supplied. Each one, therefore, needs the society of the other ; hence, if a division is made, both must of necessity suffer. At some future day, perhaps it will be possible to make this division, otherwise, desirable, without such great detriment ; yet it will always be profitable to proceed slowly in a matter of such importance, lest, under the specious appearance of greater utility, the strength of both parts be impaired. For the present, at any rate, it is evident that the division would be a calamity ; and it s Souvay, "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. II, pp. 309-310. io Ibidem, vol. II, p. 48. 392 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis is of the utmost importance that both sections remain under the author- ity of only one Bishop, to whom, however, a Coadjutor should be given, to take a portion of his solicitude.'' 11 As St. Louis was even then (1820) mentioned as a Metropolitan See, Bishop Du Bourg, gave his views on the question. "But the matter is not yet ripe for consideration," he wrote. Now, as Cardinal Fontana declined to give the Prelate his first choice, Father Sibourd, as Coad- jutor, Du Bourg expresses his willingness to bear the burden alone, as long as his strength might last. In the meantime the Bishop of Louisi- ana felt it incumbent upon himself to visit the lower part of his diocese. On St. Mathias' Day 1821, he relates to Cardinal Fontana in triumphant tones the welcome news of his victory over all obstacles: "Your Em- inence is aware, I believe, of the amount of hatred first aroused against me in this Lower Louisiana; it went so far that I could go there only at considerable risk. It will be to you, therefore, a source of great wonder to hear that, in this visitation of my Diocese, I have met, all the way to NeAv Orleans, a practically unanimous welcome from the clergy and the people. ' ' This is truly the work of the Lord, and so wonderful has this change of spirit appeared, that the persons who knew the distress I was in, can scarcely believe their eyes when they behold the consolations with which the all-merciful God gladdens my soul. Among those who exhibited the greatest signs of joy and reverence at my coming, one of the most conspicuous was the Rev. Father Anthony De Sedella, the very same man who, in former times, I know not why, was most hostile to me. Words are unavailing to describe the honors with which he welcomed me, and I would dare say that there is no one more in harmony with me, no one to whom genuine affection prompts to more solicitude in my behalf. This example has given the tone to the whole city, so that I was not afraid to celebrate publicly a Synod in that same city where a year ago, merely to show myself would have meant extreme danger. "This Synod was made up of some twenty priests from Lower Louisiana. All manifested in unison both their obedience to me and their zeal for the maintenance of Ecclesiastical discipline. It afforded me likewise much consolation to see the change in morals and the increase of piety which, thanks to the labors of my brother-priests, has been effected in almost every parish within so short a space of time. "As to the rest, the S. Congregation will be made fully cognizant of it by the Rev. Angelo Inglesi, a native of Rome whom I mentioned in my preceding letter. I would not hesitate to ask him for my Coadjutor were it not proper, according to my judgment, to wait a few years, until he is more fully appreciated by his brother-priests. n Souvay, op. cit., vol. II, p. 131. Bishop Du Bourg and the Coadjutor ship 393 However, permit me, My Lord, to give you this hint of my wish, so that in ease I should depart this life before this wish is fulfilled. Your Eminence may know that I deem no one to be more acceptable as my successor. I am glad that the present occasion is offered Your Eminence and the other Cardinals of the Sacred Congregation to know him and bring about the fulfilment of my desires." 12 The first mention of Angelo Inglesi by Bishop Du Bourg is found in his letter of October 4th, 1815, to Father Simon Brut6, in which he is styled a "Roman Count," an acquisition of the first order, and a man who had made his studies for the priesthood, and lacked but the final touches. On October 8th, he sings the praises of Inglesi to Father Rosati. On March 20, 1820, he ordains Inglesi and in May, 1820, he sends him to Rome as his personal representative. 13 On the death of Father De Andreis, October 1820, Bishop Du Bourg proposed to appoint Father Rosati his Vicar-General, "sans reserves," But the episcopal visitation in Lower Louisiana has once more forced upon his consideration the appointment of a coadjutor. If he gets no help, all may be lost. He now realizes that an old man will not do. He makes no complaint that Propaganda refused to give him Sedella and Sibourd, both old men, "But then it remains to me to choose from among the younger clergy one who, by the maturity of his judgment, his sin- cere devotion and his other remarkable qualifications, may make up what he lacks in years. Such a one, unless affection misleads me, I have found in the person of my most beloved son, the Rev. Angelo Inglesi, whom Divine Providence has placed by my side to be to me a comforter in my sorrows and the staff of my coming old age. To tell plainly the truth, never did I have anyone so congenial to me, and who ever showed greater affection for; me and greater solicitude for my flock. This solicitude it was which, when he saw me destitute of almost every means either of support- ing myself, or of promoting the interest of our missions, led him to Europe, in order that both with his own fortune, which is not small, and with the offerings that he would beg from the faithful he might supply our want, and recruit a new band of laborers that we are so much in need of. For this reason I do not hesitate to salute him from afar as the chief founder of the Diocese. I believe that Your Eminence is aware of the journeys he has already undertaken for that purpose, of how worthily he has acquitted himself of his mission, and of the honors bestowed opon him everywhere, even by the greatest princes and 12 Souvay, op. eit., vol. II, pp. 134 and 135. i3 Msgr. Holweek hns given a very interesting though saddening account of Angelo Inglesi in the ' ' St.. Louis Catholic Historical Review, ' ' vol. V, pp. 14-39. The so-called "Montmorency Loan," one of Inglesi 's transactions, is treated by Dr. Souvay in the same Review, vol. II, pp. 199-203. 394 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis the potentates of various countries. All this evinces certainly a prudence beyond his age and leaves no doubt that this new Timothy will so con- duct himself in the Episcopate that no one shall despise his youth. Why should not, therefore, this satisfaction be given, not only to my own wishes, but also to those of the whole clergy and people of Louisiana, who unanimously desire him for Coadjutor and successor." 14 In Bishop Du Bourg's fervid imagination, Inglesi is the Novus Timotheus; he is received by princes and nobles, he deserves the title of the praecipuus dioceseos fundator. On July 16th, 1822, he praises Inglesi for sending a small band of missionaries, and on September 16th, he writes to Rosati, that he has reserved Ste. Genevieve that had become vacant through the death of Father Hem-i Pratte, for his beloved Angelo. On the same day he receives the first inkling of Inglesi 's scandalous conduct in Rome. How pitiful this whole episode ! Bishop Du Bourg would not act rashly. Yet, as the hasty ordination of Inglesi was in conflict with the Constitution "Speculatores" of Innocent XII, Novem- ber 4th, 1694, enacting "that no Bishop can lawfully raise anyone not his own subject to Sacred Orders, unless the candidate has established there his domicile for at least ten years, and affirmed under oath that he has truly the intention of remaining there ; bringing testimonial letters from the Ordinary of the place of his birth," Bishop Du Bourg had incurred suspension, ipso facto, for one year, from conferring Orders. He was so notified by Cardinal Fontana in the name of tin 1 Sacred Congregation, who, however added "As their Eminences are fully convinced that Your Lordship broke the Apostolic Constitution in good faith, and not out of contempt, they w T ere of opinion that the Holy Father, should be beseeched to deign absolve from the afore-mentioned penalties, by his Apostolic authority, insofar as needs be, both Your Lordship and those who were thus ordained by you. The Holy Father, in the audience granted to the undersigned Secretary of the 15th inst., kindly acceded to the request of the S. Congregation. I wish, however, to warn Your Lordship and all the other Prelates of the United States, that they should henceforth conform in every point with the above mentioned Constitution." 15 The division of the diocese, and the erection of St. Louis into an episcopal See, was again broached by Cardinal Fontana : Bishop Du Bourg answers on February 8th, 1822: "As to the erection of another See in the City of St. Louis, Missouri, no one certainly can be pleased with it and desire it more than myself, as it means for me relief from immense labors and cares. Still, there is one reason why I delay asking at once for it, namely, the most earnest desire I have to free from all debts and obligations certain quite extensive properties which I have i* Souvay, op. cit., vol. IT, pp. 139 and 140. 15 Souvay, op. cit., vol. Ti. p. 14fi. Bishop Du Bourg and the Coadjutor ship 395 bought as an endowment for that See : I trust that, God helping, I may within a year reach this happy goal. When this is accomplished I shall most gladly resign this part of my solicitude into the hands of the Sovereign Pontiff, hesitating at no sacrifice, in order that the Prelate who is appointed to this new See may be spared the temporal cares and the utmost destitution which were my lot for several years." 16 Early in 1822 Bishop Du Bourg received from the Holy See the magnificent sum of four thousand Roman scudi as a contribution to the support of the diocese of Louisiana. 17 But Father Inglesi was active among the Roman nobles, and promised to send even larger sums. Bishop Du Bourg defended him in a letter to Cardinal Consalvi, Pro-Prefect of the Sacred Congregation, submitting a letter of a certain Mrs. Perret. The Cardinal answered : "I have received copy of a letter supposed to be written by the Perret woman to Father Inglesi ; but even if the latter would try to justify himself of the grave misdemeanor which is imputed to him (right or wrong, I know not), still, he exhibited other signs of levity and impropriety, both by taking part in dances and by a mode of dress in no way befitting an Ecclesiastic. For this cause, clever and most skillful in business though he be, yet I do not wish that your high estimate of him should dispense you from watching and from carefully investigating his character. ' ' 18 "I am confident," wrote Bishop Du Bourg to Father Martial, "that Father Inglesi is entirely justified." He evidently disbelieved the report. At any rate, writing to Father Rosati on Easter Sunday (April 7), 1822, he spoke of Inglesi in the following terms: "Father Inglesi will bring us recruits. He is not a Bishop, neither does he wish to hear of it. He was sorry to have written to me a certain letter which I communicated to you. He announces, he will be here about the beginning of the year (1823). I cannot tire of admiring his devotedness and zeal. But as you may imagine, this disappointment causes me some uneasiness. But it matters not ! God knows what is best. We ought not to lose courage. ' ' 19 Four months later, and certainly after he had received Cardinal Consal- vi 's letter, speaking of the unecclesiastical behavior of Inglesi, and recommending watchfulness, Du Bourg 's enthusiasm had not yet abated. On August 7, be wrote to Father Rosati: "Good news! Five or six subjects have just arrived from France for the Seminary. One of them is Subdeacon, the other have Minor Orders. There is, moreover, a Deacon, who, I believe, is ready for Ordination. . . This reinforcement 1(1 Souvay, op. cit., vol. II, p. 150. 17 Cardinal Consalvi to Du Bourg, original in Archives of St. Louis Arch- diocese. ' ' la Souvay, op. cit., vol. II, pp. 212 and 273. !'' Souvay, op. lit., vol. II, p. 212, nolo. 396 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis which has just come to us from Europe is but the forerunner of another including four or five, perhaps even ten, priests. You understand that it is the indefatigable Father Inglesi who is sending them to me. I expect him towards the end of this year." 20 The following month (September 6) very much the same note is sounded. "I am in a quandary in regard to St. Genevieve" (it was only a few days after the death of Father Pratte). "The thought came to my mind to keep that place for Father Inglesi. I have strong reasons for so doing." Inglesi was a man of extraordinary gifts and graces, chief among them his power of captivating those with whom he came in contact. He was received at the Courts of Versailles, Naples, Lucca, Parma, Piacenza and Turin. He sent a number of excellent missionaries to Louisiana, among them such a remarkable man as John Mary Odin, According to his own report, published in Europe, he received the following sums, in virtue of his commission from Bishop Du Bourg : From the King of France 4.000 Francs The King of Holland 1,085 Francs The Emperor of Russia 20,000 Francs The Emperor of Austria 20,000 Francs His Holiness the Pope 20,400 Francs The Duchess of Tuscany 11,474 Francs The Duchess of Lucca 5,100 Francs The King of Sardinia 5,000 Francs Sundry Individuals . . . 29,192 Francs 116,251 Francs Deducting the expenses and the sums required to fit out the mis- sionaries from France, there remained a balance of 95,051 francs, which Mr. Inglesi has remitted to Bishop Du Bourg, and he publicly appeals to him for the correctness of this statement. 21 The Roman authorities, however, had full proof of Inglesi 's scan- dalous conduct and expelled him from the city. Cardinal Consalvi wrote to Bishop Du Bourg on April 27th. 1822. "In regard to the Rev. Angelo Inglesi, I reckon you are now in possession of the letter of this S. Congregation in date of September 22nd, last, in which we informed you of his improper demeanor in Rome ; hence you must no longer be thinking of his promotion. One thing in this connection vexes me very sorely, namely that we heard from New Orleans, that as the rumor was spread there that Your Lordship wanted him as Coadjutor, a great deal of trouble arose throughout Louisiana, and all the missionaries 20 Souvay, op. cit., vol. II, p. 212. 21 Souvay, op. cit., vol. II, p. 215. Bishop Du Bourg and the Coadjutors]) ip 397 were so downhearted that some left the Diocese, while others, forgetful of their former zeal and solicitude, became slack and careless in the discharge of their duties. Wherefore I earnestly beg you in the Lord to do everything in your power to suppress that evil rumor, and to recall the clergy to their duty, in order that what you have built up with so much pain and care may not, on this account, fall in ruin." 22 The 1 fears of Cardinal Consalvi were not without foundation. Father Martial reports. "The opposition which manifested itself at the time when it became known he (Bishop Du Bourg) wished to have Father Inglesi for coadjutor rent his soul asunder to such an extent that he fulminated a Circular Letter to frighten the priests ; but he was very sorry for it when he saw the effect it had produced; clever men may sometimes make great mistakes. There remains in the heart of some missionaries a wound which will be hard to heal. I tried, but in vain, to stop some from going away ; they replied to me : " One 's first duty is to save one 's self. Assure us that in exercising the ministry as we do here, we can save ourselves." 23 From Washington, where he had just made his arrangements with the Government and with the Jesuits for the missions among the northern Indians, Bishop Du Bourg gave his parting injunctions to Father Philip Borgua CM. on the eve of his journey to Rome : "1. For your soul, do not forget your spiritual exercises, ct in omnibus exhibe tr sicui Dei ministrum. 2. In the interest of the Mission, travel incognito, as much as you can ; no public collections. 3. Bring us not priests except two or three good missionaries of your Congregation, capable to relieve Father Rosati. You know the qualifications they must have : above all a great mansuetude ; no rig- orism, and something attractive in their manners. 4. Make known to the Cardinal Prefect by what artifices the no- torious Inglesi magnetized me, and Father De Andreis and all, both priests and lay people, who know him here. Say that I acknowledge my mistake and deplore it; and that such is the confusion and the sorrow into which this sad disclosure has plunged me, that I have been several times tempted to beseech His Holiness' permission to re- tire, in order that I may bewail this fault; that the sole fear to see my Diocese lost by that request prevented me ; but that if His Eminence deems it fit to relieve me of a place, of which I made myself unworthy by such a great imprudence, I am ready to resign, and will be most thankful to him. 22 Souvay, op. cit., vol. II, p. 215. 23 Ibidem, note 5. 398 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis Whoever speaks to you of this sad affair, have no hesitation to disown the wretched imposter, and to depict the sorrow wherein he has plunged me." 24 Of Angelo Inglesi's affairs from now on we have but little to say. He returned to the United States, became entangled in the scandalous Hogan schism in Philadelphia; was then shown up by the Bishop of Quebec that he had been a strolling player, and then a saloon-keeper, and was married to a Catholic woman by a Presbyterian preacher. From Philadelphia he retired to the "West Indies and died at Port Au Prince, June 13, 1825, whilst ministering to the dying during an epi- demic of cholera. Bishop Du Bourg states in his letter that he had proposed his friend Simon Brute for his coadjutor, but it is not known at what time. In regard to Fathers Sibourd and Kosetti who were repeatedly men- tioned for the dignity, Bishop Du Bourg had this to say: "The former who is now advanced in years and infirm, is moreover, afflicted by a polyp of the nose, so that he has become quite incapable to stand the work of the Episcopate. As to the latter, he never had the bodily and mental qualifications fitting one for that dignity. Still less since he has become insane, a calamity which, to the extreme sorrow and annoyance of us all, occurred two years ago." 25 Propaganda thought it expedient to appoint Father Rosati Ad- ministrator of the Church in Alabama and Mississippi, with the title of Bishop (August 13, 1822) a dignity and burden which Rosati promptly declined. Rosati was now Du Bourg 's only candidate for the Coadjutorship. 24 Souvay, op. fit., vol. Ill, p. 123. 25 Souvay, op. tit., vol. II, p. 224. Chapter 21 ROSATI'S ELECTION AS COADJUTOR BISHOP In opening his Diary of 1823, Father Rosati writes in truly lapi- dary style, every word pregnant with meaning : "As the Most Rev. Ambrose Marechal, Archbishop of Baltimore had, of his own accord, resigned in the hands of the Sovereign Pontiff, Pius VII, all the juris- diction which he held, and the care which he exercised over the ter- ritories of Mississippi and Alabama, the Holy Father at the request of the S. Congregation of Propaganda appointed me Vicar Apostolic of these two States, with the character and title of Bishop of the Church of Tenagra, in partibus infidelium, by an Apostolic Brief in date of August 13, 1822. ' ' On receiving this Brief, and other letters from the S. C. of Prop- aganda, dated respectively September 7th, and 13th, of the same year, together with the faculties both ordinary and extraordinary, sent on September 8th, after mature consideration, feeling that I was unable to bear such a burden, I answered the S. Congregation to deign to appoint somebody else ; and, at the same time, I begged earnestly Rev. F. Baccari, Vicar General of our Congregation, the Right Rev. William Du Bourg, Bishop of New Orleans, and the Right Rev. B. J. Flaget, Bishop of Bardstown, to plead with the Sovereign Pontiff in order to deliver me from the obligation of accepting that dignity. Meanwhile, at the request of the S. Congregation, the Sovereign Pontiff, by another Brief in date of January 21, 1823, added to the aforesaid Vicariate the territory of the Floridas. This Brief, however, never reached me. "At any rate, yielding to the joint entreaties of the Right Rev. Bishop of New Orleans, the Archbishop of Baltimore and the Bishop of Bardstown, Pius VII, always at the request of the S. Congregation, abrogated the aforesaid Briefs of Aiigust 13, 1822 and January 21, 1823, and maintaining to me the title of Bishop of Tenagra, made me Coadjutor to the Right Rev. Bishop of New Orleans, with this provision ; for three years I was to discharge the office of Coadjutor with right of succession ; at the end of this period the Diocese was to be divided into two : the Bishop of New Orleans would then choose whichever portion he preferred, and the administration of the other would be given to me by new Apostolic Letters to be then sent to me. I was notified of all this by a letter of the S. Congregation and a Brief dated July 14, 1823. Deterred by the advice of our Vicar General and (399) 400 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis of the Right Rev. Bishops of New Orleans and Bardstown from re- sisting the will of the Sovereign Pontiff and of the S. Congregation, to the latter, by a letter of December 6, 1823, I made known my ac- ceptance, together with my purpose of receiving Episcopal Consecration as soon as possible." 1 Thus far Bishop Rosati's account of his elevation to the Episcopacy. The vexed question of the coadjutorship was now solved to the satis- faction of all; and the eventual division of the diocese Avas removed from the changing fancies of Monseigneur. Within three years St. Louis was to have corporate existence as a diocese under one or the other prelate. How did this solution come about? How did the influ- ential men whose intercession for relief had been invoked by Rosati respond to his petition? We shall take up point by point, the state- ments made by Rosati in his Diary. It was Archbishop Marechal of Baltimore who gave the first impetus to the Avhole proceeding by explaining the necessity of new Sees in the rapidly expanding Church of America. He succeeded in obtaining at least this much, that out of the two territories of Mississippi and Ala- bama, taken away from the jurisdiction of Baltimore, a Vicariate Apos- tolic was formed, to which Father Joseph Rosati was appointed with the title and dignity of Bishop. A Pontifical Brief which settled these matters was issued on August 13, 1822 ; the Archbishop took it along with him when he went back to America, and on reaching home sent it at once to Father Rosati." 2 "This action of the Sacred Congregation of Propaganda caused consternation in the circle of Father Rosati's friends. Father Rosati himself did not hesitate for a moment to decide that, as the Episcopal dignity and burden were beyond his strength, it was his duty to refuse. He wrote so much to Cardinal Consalvi, to our Vicar General, and to some others. Bishop Du Bourg, whom this oppointment threatened to deprive of a most active co-laborer, at once wrote to Rome, ground- ing his plea on three arguments ; First, the uselessness of the recently created Vicariate, for the Catholics were few in the territory alloted to it; secondly, the inopportuneness of the erection, as there few Catholics were unable to support a Bishop ; and thirdly and foremost, Father 1 Two volumes of Bishop Eosati's Diary are preserved, the one in the Archives of Kenrick Seminary, the other in the Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. Dr. Souvay has published a large portion of this Diary in the ' ' St. Louis Catholic Historical Review/' commencing in vol. IV, p. 311, and continuing in installments till vol. V, p. 88. "Our Vicar-General" is Father Baceari. 2 "Life of Bosati, " MS. in "Archives of Procurator of the Congregation of Mission," Rome. Quoted by Souvay in "Catholic Historical Review," vol. Ill, p. 13. Bosati's Election as Coadjutor Bishop 401 Rosati's departure would surely mean the ruin of the establishment of the Mission, which was the object of his care and solicitude, and on which so much money had been spent. It would consequently be an irretrievable loss to religion." 3 The Prelate also sent the most urgent request to Father Rosati to remain firm in his refusal of the proffered honor, as his removal to the wilds of Mississippi and Alabama would certainly bring ruin on the Seminary and the diocese of Louisiana. "I pray God to direct you in your answer; but in. my opinion all is lost in the whole of Louisiana, if the thing comes to effect. And, besides the damage caused to Religion, what an injustice to me ! and what motive of despondency for all the Bishops ! God preserve me from ever believing that this affair may be consummated ! Did I believe it I would not go back to my Diocese, but I would go and tender my resignation at the feet of the Pope." 4 To the Congregation of Propaganda he wrote in his old impulsive way : " It is the downfall, in all Louisiana, of the Congregation of the Mission, which, under his care was beginning to nourish nicely, and at the head of which no one, besides him, can be put for the time being. It is the downfall of our Ecclesiastical Seminary, our only hope for this immense country ; and this downfall will bring about the dispersion of excellently trained priests and of the pupils, whom I had secured at so great a price. As to me, seeing my endeavors frustrated, if I do not die of sorrow, I will at least languish in despondency. Oh ! Your Eminence ! What have you done ? Who ever prompted you to this advice to take from the poorest of Bishops the last and only anchor of his hope ? I had accepted the Episcopate only on the condition that priests of the Congregation of the Mission would be given me to help me. I got only two capable to build up that Congregation in my Diocese, Father De Andreis and Father Rosati. One was taken away by death, and now you are depriving me of the other, when I have consumed immense labors and a great deal of money for the foundation of their Society. In one day are annihilated the fatigues and efforts of seven years. It is all over : if that appointment takes effect, there is nothing for me to hope, nothing to attempt. Dejected I shall sit, bemoaning the ruin of the edifice which, with the help of God, my labors had begun to erect." 3 3 Souvay, "Rosati's Election to the Coadjutorship of New Orleans," in "Cath- olic Historical Review," vol. Ill, p. 15. 4 Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. 5 Archives of Propaganda, in Souvay, "Correspondence of Bishop Du Bourg with Propaganda," in "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. II, p. 221. 402 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis The Holy Father, had in the meantime, placed an additional burden on Father Rosati's shoulders, assigning the temporary care of the two Floridas to the newly appointed Vicar Apostolic. "We, by the advice of our Ven. Brethren the Cardinals of the Congregation of Propaganda, have resolved to dismember from the Diocese of New Orleans the two Floridas and to unite and annex them provisionally to the recently created Vicariate Apostolic of the Ter- ritories of Mississippi and Alabama; and finally, it being our wish that our Ven. Brother Joseph Rosati, recently elected Vicar Apostolic with Episcopal dignity and title of the two territories of Mississippi and Alabama, should have care and jurisidiction over the two Floridas as well, with all the faculties enjoyed by the other Bishops of the United States; so, in virtue of our Apostolic authority by the tenor of the present letter we decree, this to stand, until other provision shall be made by this Holy See." 6 This new decree did not reach Father Rosati, yet he learnt of its tenor, after he had taken the bold step to send back to Rome the Pontifical documents. It was Father Philip Borgna, a priest of his Community, that was commissioned by Father Rosati to carry them back to Propaganda and to do all in his power to obtain the annulment of the appointment. Archbishop Marechal, Bishop Du Bourg and Bishop Flaget had meanwhile, carefully reviewed and sifted the whole matter, and their reports were unanimously against the erection of the new Vicariate Apostolic. These reports placed Propaganda in a rather embarrassing position. Yet the wisdom and resourcefulness of Rome is proverbial. The Cardinals quickly found a favorable way out of a difficulty to the attainment of a long-desired end. Suppressing the impossible Vicariate Propaganda fell back upon the old idea of dividing Louisiana. But, taught by experience, it carefully postponed taking measures for a period of three years, meantime appointing the Bishop-elect of Tenegra Coadjutor to the Bishop of New Orleans. A quotation from the Brief of Pope Pius VII, dated July 14th, 1823, will be very acceptable here as being probably the last official act of the great Pope, but even more, as being the great charter of the diocese of St. Louis. Alluding to the divisions that had been made by Propaganda, the Holy Father continues: "But now a recent report of the Secretary of the same Congregation based upon a letter of the Bishop of New Orleans, has apprized us of the fact that the establish- ment of the above-mentioned Vicariate and the Union thereto of the 6 Brief of January 21, 1823, in Souvay, "Catholic Historical Review," vol. Ill, p. 16. Bosati's Election as Coadjutor Bishop 403 Floridas made later, as well as your designation for that Vicariate are not only purposeless, owing to the small number of Catholics in the countries forming it; not only inopportune because these countries are utterly unable to support a Bishop, but also your very appointment will be a calamity for the cause of Religion in all Louisiana, for your departure from Louisiana will strike the death-blow, it is asserted, to the house of the Congregation of the Mission recently erected and working so usefully in Louisiana, and to the Ecclesiastical Seminary, and finally to the College founded for the education of young men in Religion and in 'the liberal arts, as you are the only person, on account of the scarcity and youth of the sacred ministers residing in those parts, who can be usefully at the head of these establishments. Therefore, the afore-mentioned, Apostolic Letters whereby We made you Vicar Apostolic of the Territories of Mississippi and Alabama in the United States and added to it the Floridas dismembered from the Diocese of New Orleans, and elected you Vicar Apostolic, We, in virtue of the apostolic authority, by the tenor of these presents cancel and abrogate ; and thus, as We had elected you Bishop of Tenegra as per our former Apostolic letter of August 13th, 1822, and as you now have possibly received already Episcopal Consecration, canceling likewise your appointment as Vicar Apostolic, We designate you to aid the Bishop of New Orleans in the administration of his Diocese in quality of his coad- jutor, the following, however, being understood both by you and by that bishop : Louisiana shall be divided into two Episcopal Sees within three years ; if, which may God avert ! the Bishop of New Orleans should depart this life before the division be made, you shall at first take the administration of the whole of Louisiana; then when the division will be made, you shall have the government of only one of these two Sees, and the other shall be turned over to the person designated by the Ap- ostolic See." 7 Father Borgna reached Rome in the First days of November. Since leaving America on April 10th, he had had ample time to make reflections, and he had come to the conclusion that the good of religion in America imposed upon him the duty of disregarding the wishes of his Superior, and of urging strongly Father Rosati's ap- pointment. In November 1823, Propaganda sent back to Father Rosati the Brief of August 13th, 1822, and accompanied it with a letter ap- pealing to the appointee's sense of obedience. But he had already sub- mitted himself to the inevitable. Both Bishop Du Bourg and Bishop Flaget made it clear to the Bishop Elect that it was his duty to resist no longer. Father Baccari also had advised acceptance. On December 7 Brief of July 14, 1823, in Souvay, 1. e. pp. 18 and 19. 404 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis 6th, Father Rosati wrote to his brother Nicola: "I wrote to you sonic time ago that last year 1 had been elected Vicar Apostolic and Bishop of Tenegra (in partibus) ; 1 refused to accept. My refusal has been taken into consideration in so far as the Vicariate Apostolic is concerned ; but instead I have been elected Coadjutor to Bishop Du Bourg. I con- fess to you that that burden affrights me. But I find myself in the necessity of refusing no longer, as this was made to me a grave duty of conscience by our Bishop and by others whom I consulted. I must therefore submit." 8 "However, as T had sent back to Rome the Apostolic Letter of August 13, 1822, the S. Congregation returned it to me, adding a new letter, dated November 22, 1823, commanding me to obey the will of the Apostolic See. In compliance with these orders of the Holy See, and receiving from the Bishop of New Orleans letters advising me of the place in Lower Louisiana where the Consecration was to be, and of the most convenient time for that ceremony, I made my prep- arations for the journey. Accordingly I started from the Seminary for Ste. Genevieve as winter was at its fiercest. Received there most amiably by Father F. X. Dahmen, priest of our Congregation, and Rector of that Church, I stayed with him waiting for a boat. On the Sunday, (February 1st) preached at high Mass to the people. Septuagesima Sunday (February 8th) preached at high Mass to the people. Sexagesima Sunday ; preached at high Mass to the people. Quinquagesima Sunday : celebrating Mass early in the morning, went on board, and we left Ste. Genevieve. ' ' Until the mouth of the Ohio, river trip quite difficult, owing to the low stage of the water. Five times we struck sand bars, so that it was only after twelve days, that is, on March 4, that we reached there. The remainder of the journey we made most rapidly, for the Ohio, brimful of water, bringing to the Mississippi its most generous tribute, permitted the latter to carry the largest vessels ; accordingly in three days we made Natchez, and the following day late at night I left the boat and landed near Donaldsonville. There for two days I enjoyed the hospitality of Father Brassac, welcomed Father Acquaroni, who came to see me ; and, accompanied by Father Brassac, went over to see the Bishop at the house of his nephew nine miles from the Church of the Ascension on the left side of the river; we welcomed him jnst as he was coming back from New Orleans. Two days I enjoyed there his company and conversation, and accompanied by him I came back to Donaldsonville. The next day, after the divine service. Father Brassac took me over to the Parish of the Assumption ; there, as the guest of the 8 Bosati to his brother Nicola, December (5, 1823, in Souvay, 1. (it., p. 20. Rosati's Election as Coadjutor Bishop 405 Pastor, Father Bigeschi, I made a few days retreat, after which Fathers Bigeschi, Tichitoli and myself set off for Father Bernard de Deva's, where we remained over night ; the following day we reached St. Joseph 's where we spent the rest of that day and the night with Fathers Potini and Rosti, priests of our Congregation who have charge of that Parish. The next day after Mass we went back to Father Bernard's and remained with him until the following day, being detained by rain. After dinner we came to the Assumption and finally to Donald- sonville, where I found the Rt. Rev. Bishop of New Orleans and most of those who had been invited to the Consecration. Everything in the church was in readiness; the joyous peal of the church bell, the roar of the mortar, the sound of innumerable pipes, first from the houses near the church, then from every other house inside and even outside the Parish of the Ascension heralded to all the faithful the morrow's celebration. "Accordingly, on the day devoted to commemorate the Lord's In- carnation, in the church of the Ascension at Donaldsonville, amidst a great concourse of people, the following pastors and members of the clergy of the Diocese being in attendance : Revs. Bernard Deva, former pastor of the Assumption; Joseph Bigeschi, present rector of the same parish; Charles De la Croix, pastor of St. Michael's; Anduze, of St. James'; Brassac, of the Ascension; Potini, of St. Joseph's; Rosti and Tichitoli, priests of the Congregation of the Mission; Millet, pastor of St. Charles ; Peyretti, Janvier ; Mr. Hermant, a cleric ; the Very Rev. L. Sibourd, Vicar-General, and Father Anthony de Sedella, O. M. C, ful- filling by dispensation the office of Assistant Consecrators. I was anointed and consecrated by the Right Rev. Louis William Du Bourg ; Father Anduze preached the sermon. Assisted at the High Mass, after which I administered the Sac- rament of Confirmation to five persons." After the consecration in the Church of The Ascension, Donaldson- ville, Bishop Rosati made a round of visits to his old and new friends in Lower Louisiana. His first visit was to Father Francis Cellini, then re- siding in the Parish of St. Charles of Opelousas. Father Hercules Brassac accompanied him. Travelling partly by boat, partly on horseback, they reached their destination, the house of Madam Mary Smith, where Father Cellini and Rosti were staying on April 1st. On the next morning the Bishop visited the Convent of the Ladies of the Sacred Heart, erected there under the auspices of Madam Smith, and said. Mass, and gave the Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament to the Nuns and to thirty girls who were educated there. Rosati 's Diary. 406 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis The next two days Rosati said Mass in the same place, and preach- ed to the Nuns and the girls. After Mass said at an early hour, he was taken back to the boat by Father Cellini ; and going on board, the party sailed through the Bayous, the next day; thence in a carriage they came about night fall to the Mississippi river; the next day they reached Donaldsonville where Father Rosti was waiting for them. On the 9th, the Bishop took a boat to carry him down the river, and at halfpast six he landed in New Orleans. From the boat he went straightway to the Bishop's residence, and remained there. He said Mass in the Church of the Ursulines, after which he paid a visit to their Superior and to Father Anthony ; and saw at the Bishop 's res- idence all the priests living in the city, namely, Father Sibourd, Moni, Jeanjean, Richard, Acquaroni, Portier, Janvier, Midland, and Bertrand. On Palm Sunday, he said Mass early in the morning in the church of the Nuns; and, later on, in the cathedral, before the solemn Mass, he blessed and distributed the Palms and was present at the procession and solemn Mass. On Maundy Thursday, he celebrated pontifical Mass in the church of the Nuns, to whom he gave Holy Communion. He assisted at the solemn Mass and the solemn Consecration of the Oils by the Bishop of New Orleans in the Cathedral, also at the office of Tenebrae. On Good Friday, he celebrated the service solemnly in the church of the Nuns, and at the cathedral attended the office of Tenebrae, after which he went to visit the tomb of Father Ferrari, priest of the Con- gregation. On Easter Sunday, Celebrated solemn pontifical Mass in the Cathedral; during Mass the right Rev. Bishop Du Bourg, preach- ed the sermon from the communion rail, assisted at Vespers in the same place. On May 10th, the Coadjutor Bishop finally sailed on the Dolphin : his companions were Father Potini and the Seminarian Hermant. After ten days the boat landed at Bois-Brule, twelve miles from the Seminary. Here the student disembarked, whilst the Bishop and Father Potini continued the journey to St. Louis, arriving there on May 20th. After a brief rest at the Cathedral in company of Father Niel, Audizio and Saulnier the Bishop set out for St. Ferdinand to visit the Novitiate of the Jesuits under Father Van Quickenborne and the Convent of the Ladies of the Sacred Heart and Mother Duchesne. The next morn- ing the Bishop returned to St. Louis where he had a long conversation with General William Clark, the Superintendent of Indian Affairs for the West, about the Indian Missions. From St. Louis the Bishop started back to the Seminary. The good people of the Barrens wished to give the returning Father and Shepherd a loud and hearty welcome, Rosati's Election as Coadjutor Bishop 407 and had sent Mr. Paquin to Ste. Genevieve, to give them timely warning of the Prelate's approach. The Bishop forbade the young man to carry out the plan. Hence the people had no chance of giving the Bishop a solemn reception on his home coming. 10 "I shall continue to reside at the Seminary and to live in one Community, teaching my classes," wrote Bishop Rosati to Propaganda on accepting the Episcopacy, as it had been stipulated by Father Baccari, as well as by Bishop Du Bourg. The former wrote : "By virtue of an agreement entered into with Propaganda, you must remain Superior of the house and Seminary over there, and head of the whole Mission in America, with the ordinary powers of Visitor. or even of Vicar General, for all cases where there is no time to write to Rome and wait for an answer; and therefore you are empowered to appoint confreres to rule the houses with the title of Vicar-Superiors." 11 The latter had written to Propaganda: "In a former letter I asked that Father Brute, a Sulpician priest of the highest merit, be given me for Coadjutor, as I was afraid that if Father Rosati were ap- pointed he would be taken away from the superiorship of his Society. But now that he has already been designated for the Episcopate, I ask that he be given the preference over Father Brute for the Coadjutor- ship, and may continue at the same time to be Superior of his Congrega- tion until some one else may take his place in this office. This is an easy way of reconciling every interest. Father Rosati, residing in Upper Louisiana, where are the headcpiarters of his Congregation and the Seminary, will administer, in my name, with Episcopal authority, the portion of the Diocese, while at the same time he will foster the progress of the infant Society. I. on the other hand, shall principally take care of Lower Louisiana, and continue to provide for the little flock in Mississippi; finally, the Catholics of Alabama and Florida will have their own Bishop." 12 10 Diary. 11 Souvay, "Rosati's Elevation to the See of St. Louis," 1. fit., p. 171. 12 Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese, ef. Souvay, "Correspondence of Du Bourg with Propaganda," 1. eit., vol. II, p. 223. Chapter 22 LINKING OLD AND NEW The appointment of Rosati as Coadjutor Bishop with residence in the northern part of the diocese of Louisiana, established St. Louis an episcopal See, de facto, though not as yet de jure. By Bishop Du Bourg's consent Bishop Rosati exercised full jurisdiction in Missouri, Arkansas, Western Illinois, and all the territory to the North and West. Within three years this arrangement was to become permanent, de jure also ; St. Louis with the surrounding territory was to become i separate diocese with Joseph Rosati as its first Bishop. It seems proper, therefore, at this juncture, to link up the new regime that Bishop Du Bourg had initiated, and Bishop Rosati was to continue and extend, with the remnants of the old regimes of the French Jesuits and the Spanish Monks, that survived the period of change and disaster. There were the ancient parishes on the east bank of the Mississippi, Cahokia, Kaskaskia, Prairie du Rocher in Illinois; the Post of Arkan- sas, the former Parish of New Madrid, Ste. Genevieve, then Father Dunand's stations in Perry County, the Catholic villages of St. Michael's, Old Mines, Potosi, Little Canada; then the old Catholic towns on the Missouri River, St. Charles, St. Ferdinand with Dardenne and Portage des Sioux, and lastly St. Louis itself with Carondelet as a dependency. The numerous recruits brought from overseas by Bishop Du Bourg and his supporters were, of course, distributed over all Louisiana, Upper and Lower as well. Father Felix De Andreis, the first and foremost member of the new clergy, was stationed at the Pro-Cathedral in St. Louis, where Bishop Du Bourg also had his residence. Father De Andreis was retained as Vicar-General, Superior of the La^arists and Pastor of the Cathedral until his holy death. It was in the primitive parsonage of Father Bernard de Limpach on Church St., now Second, between Market and Walnut, that the Servant of God spent the last years of his life. It was here that he established the first novitiate of his Congregation with Father Ferrari and M. M. Tichitoli and Dahmen as novices. Father De Andreis' successor as pastor of the Cathedral, and President of the College established under his auspices, was the Rev. Francis Niel, with Leo Deys and A. B. Anduze as assistants, and Edmund Saulnier, then but a student, as teacher of languages. The Rev. Aristide Anduze, a native of the diocese of Rennes, in France, came to Missouri in (he summer of 1820, after making his (408) Linking Old and New 409 theological studies at Mount St. Mary's Seminary, Baltimore, and was raisedto the priesthood in November 1821. After teaching a while at the College of St. Louis, Father Anduze was called to Lower Louisiana. He was chosen to preach the sermon on the occasion of Bishop Rosati 's consecration ; and a very eloquent sermon it was, as Bishop Rosati bore witness. Of the three original novices of Father De Andreis. Joseph Tichitoli, was a member of that little band of clerics who had gathered around the Milanese priest, John Mary Rosetti, and were ac- cepted by Bishop Du Bourg, when he came to Milan in 1816. And he alone of all the band was permitted to accompany the advance guard under De Andreis; whilst the others had to wait until 1818. Tichitoli was a native of Como. Bishop Du Bourg raised him to the priesthood on the 15th of December 1818 and sent him to Lower Louisiana. Father Rosati speaks of him as a most precious subject, full of zeal and a very able preacher both in English and in French, the proper man for giving missions." The second member of this noble trio, Fr. Andrew Ferrari, a native of Port Maurice, was already a priest when, in 1815, he resolved with his friend, Canon Caretti, to enlist for the American mission. While in Kentucky he begged admission into the Vincentian Order, and after six months' novitiate, was sent to Vincennes, as assistant of Father -Anthony Blanc, whom he succeeded as pastor in January 1820. He died in New Orleans, of the yellow fever, November 2, 1822. Father Sedella held the funeral services over the remains of his faith- ful assistant. The third and last of Father de Andreis' novices was a native of Germany, the Rev. Francis Xavier Dahmen, who Avas born at Dueren, in the diocese of Aix-la-Chapelle, on March 23, 1789. But of good Father Dahmen we have given a partial account in the chapter on Ste. Genevieve. We shall meet him again in a future chapter at St. Vincent's Church St. Louis. Father Henry Pratte of Ste. Genevieve was one of the golden links that clasped the new regime to the old. He was the first native priest of Missouri, having been born in Ste. Genevieve on January 19, 1788. He made his theological studies in Montreal and, after his ordination, called upon Bishop Flaget, the Administrator, and was appointed pastor of his native city. The parish of Ste. Genevieve had been with- out a priest since the death of Father Maxwell, May 28th, 1814. Kaskaskia, the glorious mother of Ste. Genevieve, but now a mere wreck of former greatness, was assigned to Father Pierre Desmoulins. who came from France to America, with Du Bourg in 1817, and journeyed to the Barrens with Father Rosati. After his ordination at Ste. Genevieve, November 1, 1818 ; he was appointed to Kaskaskia, •110 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis in 1819, and there opened a school. As pastor of Baton Rouge, Father Pierre Desmoulins caused much excitement by refusing to suffer masonic symbols to be united with the ceremonies of the church at a funeral. The trustees of the church applied to the Bishop of Louisiana that he might direct the curate to conform to their wishes on the subject. In 1822 Prairie du Rocher was still attended by that grand old man, Father Donatien Olivier, then in his 73rd year, but soon to retire to the hospitable shelter of St. Mary's of the Barrens (1827). Bishop Rosati says of him: "He is a saint, who has labored for many years in the service of all the Catholics of these regions." The parish was attended from the Seminary by Father Cellini, De Neckere, Mascar- oni, and from Kaskaskia by Father Paillasson until 1832, when Father Vitalis Van Clostere became its pastor. Father Van Clostere came to Missouri under the auspices of Father De Neckere, in company of Peter Doutreluigne and Peter Paul Lefevere. He was, as his name indicates, a Belgian. Cahokia, the oldest town in the valley, still had its old pastor, Father Francis Savine, the last of the Canadian priests to serve the people of the Illinois. On his departure for the South, Father Peter Doutreluigne officiated at the church of the Holy Family every Sunday. St. Ferdinand of Florissant remained in charge of the Trappist Prior, Mary Joseph Dunancl, until 1820, when Father Charles De La Croix took charge. The Nuns of the Sacred Heart, on their transmi- gration from St. Charles, were deeply indebted to him for his paternal solicitude. Mother Duchesne's character sketch of Father De La Croix will be of interest here: "Simple as a child and valiant as a soldier, Mr. De La Croix was afraid of nothing, he dreaded neither the floods nor the depths of the forest swarming with serpents and wild beasts, nor the pathless deserts he had to travel through at night. In all dangers his shield was the sign of the cross, and he had an unbounded confidence in the Angels. On entering into any negotiations he took care, before speaking to the persons he had to treat with, to pray to their guardian angels, and experience had proved to him that this expedient always succeeded. The Bishop used to call him 'his Angel.' And he had in- deed, an angelic love of God and an activity in service which made him fly whenever work was to be done for religion. ' n During their stay at St. Charles, the devoted sisters had for their Director and Confessor, the very Rev. Benedict Richard, the pastor of St. Charles. Father Richard — not to be confounded with Father Gabriel Richard, pastor of Detroit — had come to Louisiana about the same time as Mother Duchesne and her companions, reaching St. Louis 1 Erskine, "Mother Du Chesne, " p. 208. Linking Old and New 411 on the 20th of August 1818. He was first assigned to. St. Charles, thus remaining in close contact with the Sacred Heart Nuns. Some time after the departure of the Community to Florissant Father Richard himself was transferred to Louisiana, where he was appointed chaplain of the Ursulines. During the epidemic of yellow fever in 1822, Father Richard was attacked by the disease, but "heaven" wrote Father Odin some time later, "did not Avish to deprive the Mission of such a holy man." He became Vicar-General of New Orleans under Bishop De Neckere. St. Charles of the Little Hills on the Missouri, had been a parish under the Spanish regime, but lay forsaken until the arrival of Father Benedict Richard. He was succeeded by Father John Baptist Acquar- oni, a native of Porto Maurizio, who as a priest of the Mission had joined Father De Andreis and Rosati on their journey from Rome to America. He remained in St. Thomas' Seminary, until the arrival of Bishop Du Bourg and arrived in St. Loins on April 25th, 1818. A few months later Bishop Du Bourg put him in charge of the two parishes of Portage des Sioux and La Dardenne, Mo. In October 1820 he ac- companied from St. Louis to the Barrens the body of Father De Andreis. In the summer 1822 he departed for the South. "He lacks a little the polite manners which some people want to see in a priest." The village of Carondelet, or as it was usually called, Vide Poche, with about one hundred French families, had no priest in 1825, but was later on visited by Father Edmund Saulnier. St. Michaels at Fredericktown also had no resident priest, but was attended from the Barrens until 1827, when Father Potini took charge of the parish, to be succeeded by Father Francis Cellini. In Old Mines the two hundred Catholic families had a church, but no priest. It was visited a few times a year from Ste. Genevieve. At New Madrid there was neither church nor priest in 1824: but Father Cellini went there from the Barrens about four times a year, and remained about a month at a time. There now remains but one of the old foundations in Missouri, to be spoken of, the Barrens, having about two hundred Catholic fam- ilies, and very good ones at that. They were of Anglo-American stock, and spoke only English. It was here that the Seminary was planted in 1818. In 1825, the faculty of this institution of learning was composed of Bishop Rosati and the Lazarist Fathers Leo De Neckere, Francis Collins, and Bernard Permoli, with Father John Odin and the Deacon John Timon as travelling missionaries, in Arkansas and Texas. There were fourteen ecclesiastical students at the Barrens. Father Francis Cellini was accompanied on his voyage to America by two scholastics, Anthony Potini and Philip Borgne, both of whom 412 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis became members of the Congregation of the Mission. Father Cellini's long, and, at times, rather tempestuous life will be treated in a chapter of its own. His predecessor al St. Michaels Fredericktown deserves a brief notice here, if it were only for the trouble and grief he caused his Superior by his unpriestly eonduel and his constant complaints. Rev. Anthony Potini a native of Velletri, where he was born in 1799, entered the Congregation of the Mission at Monte Citorio, Rome, in January 1816, and was sent to America while yet a scholastic in 1818, arriving at the Barrens January 5, 1819. Ordained to the priest- hood on the Sunday before the feast of All Saints 1820, he was sent during the Spring of 1821 to take charge of the parish of St. Joseph, in Lower Louisiana. Father Philip Borgna was a man of far different character. Born at Saluzzo in Piedmont he came to America with his firends Cellini and Potini in October 1818, and arrived at the Barrens January 5, 1819. Borgna was raised to the priesthood by Bishop Du Bourg, in St. Louis, March 19, 1820. He then returned to the Seminary, but soon after was stationed at the Cathedral in New Orleans. During the cholera epidemic he vied with Father Ferrari, in his devotedness to the stricken people. He was sent to Italy in 1823 as Bishop Du Bourg 's agent. He remained in Italy until the fall of 1824 and then came back to New Orleans, and after a few years Avas recalled to Missouri, where he be- came Vicar-Genera! of the Diocese. Father Leo De Neckere, Bishop Rosati's right hand man at the Seminary, who was destined to become Bishop of New Orleans, calls for a passing notice here. He was born at Wevelkhem, in the diocese of Ghent, Flanders, on June 5, 1800. Being received by Bishop Du Bourg for the Louisi- ana Mission, he sailed from Bordeaux, with Bishop Du Bourg, arrived in Kentucky with the others and there studied theology for a year under Father Rosati ; left Kentucky with Rosati for the Barrens, and thence was sent to St. Louis, where he was put to teach in the College. He was received into the Congregation of the Mission by Father De Andreis, on June 9, 1820. He went back shortly after to the Barrens, whence Bishop Du Bourg called him again to St. Louis in September. He was there when Father De Andreis died, and a few weeks later returned to the Barrens. He was ordained subdeacon in the fall of 1821, and the next year after his vows, deacon and priest. Concerning Father Permoli we have but little to say. Born at Piacenza, Italy, on February 26, 1797, he entered the novitiate in Rome, the 25th of November 1815, he was some time later sent back to the Alberoni College in his native city, as a student. There he made his vows and was ordained in due time. When Father Borgna returned Linking Old and New 413 to America in the fall of 1824, he obtained permission to take along with him Father Permoli. The two "travelling missionaries" mentioned by Bishop Rosati in his report of 1825, in the course of time, became Bishops, John Mary Odin and John Timon, the one in the South, the other in the East. John Mary Odin, born February 25, 1800, at Ambierle, France, arrived at the Barrens in August 1822, with five companions; he completed there his theological studies, and was ordained to the priest- hood by Bishop Du Bourg, May 4, 1823. Meantime (November 8, 1822) he had entered the Novitiate of the Lazarists. After his ordination he remained at the Seminary, occupied in teaching and in the care of the parish. After his short stay at Cape Giradeau, he returned to the Seminary, which he left in 1840 for the Texas Missions. He was made (March 6, 1842) Vicar Apostolic of Texas, the title being changed a few years later into that of Bishop of Galveston. In 1861 Bishop Odin was transferred to the Archbishopric of New Orleans. In 1869 he went to Rome to attend the Vatican Council but, falling sick in Rome, he left the Eternal City for his natal home in Ambierle, where he died in May 1870. Deacon John Timon, Father Odin's companion on the missionary tour, was born at Lancaster, Pennsylvania, February 12, 1797. Hav- ing stayed six months at St. Louis at the Bishop's, was sent to the Seminary where he arrived the 19th of July 1822. He was ap- pointed instructor in English and infirmarian. He received tonsure on October 12, 1822, and was put at the head of the catechism class in the church, was admitted to the Novitiate April 25, 1823. Father Timon eventually became Superior of the Lazarists, Vicar-General of the Di- ocese, and Bishop of Buffalo. 2 In 1822 there appeared in New York the First Catholic Directory in the United States called "The Laity's Directory to the Church Services. 1822." It is a small volume but full of important matter concerning the Church of that early date. The chapter on the Diocese of Louisiana is of special interest to us. As the booklet is a rarity we will give in full the pari that refers to the diocese of St. Louis. Bishopric of Louisiana. Rt. Rev. Dr. William Du Bourg, Bishop. Consecrated In Rome, Sept. 24, 1815. This diocese includes the whole ancient Louisiana, as sold by France to the United States, together with the Floridas; The Episcopal 2 Most of the biographical data of this chapter were selected from that rich collection of historical facts bearing on the history of Bishop Rosati and his times, made by the loving yet critical zeal of the Very Rev. Charles L. Souvay, C. M., D. D., President of Kenrick Seminary, and laid up for use in the "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," of which he was the Editor. ■±14 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis See was erected in 1796, when the country yet belonged to the crown of Spain. Ancient Louisiana is now divided into the state of that name, whose capital is New-Orleans; the state of Missouri, the chief town of which is St. Louis, and the territory of Arkansas. The extent of the diocese has induced the bishop to divide his residence between New-Orleans and St. Louis, in each of which he has his Episcopal chair. In the probable event of his soon obtaining a coadjutor, the two Prelates would then settle one in each of these two extremities. The Clerical Seminary, founded about two years ago, is in the state of Missouri, Perry county, in a settlement called Barrens. It is held by the priests of the Mission of St. Vincent of Paul, under the superiority of the Rev. Joseph Rosati. The novitiate of that venerable congregation is at present composed of six or seven members. Several priests of the same holy Institute are disseminated in parishes through the Diocese. The Seminary begins to flourish, and promises a succes- sion of well informed and pious missionaries. Among the priests of the seminary, one is devoted to the neighboring missions as far as New Madrid. St. Louis has a Catholic college, under the inspection of the Bishop and several clergymen, either priests or juniors, the priests are the Rev. M. M. F. Niel, Leo Deys, and A. B. Anduze, who beside their collegiate duties perform also the service of the Cathedral, and attend to other parochial functions, both in St. Louis and neighboring settle- ments. The officiating clergymen in the upper part of the Diocess, be- sides the above named, are the Rev. Henry Pratte, in St. Genevieve, a thriving town, sixty miles south of St. Louis; the Rev. P. Desmoulins, Kaskaskias, the Rev. N. Olivier, Prairie Du Rocher ; the Rev. N. Savine, Cahokias; the Rev. Charles De La Croix, St. Ferdinand; who also at- tends the infant missions on the Missouri : The Rev. Joseph Aquaroni, P. of the M. for St. Charles, Dardenne, and Portage des Sioux. There are churches in all the above places, the most remarkable of which are the New Cathedral in St. Louis, a brick building 130 feet long, not yet completely finished, adorned with valuable paintings, organ and furniture ; the brick church now building in St. Ferdinand, on a very handsome plan, and that of St. Genevieve. The State of Missouri is also blessed with the institution of the Religious Ladies of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, a precious colony ar- rived, from France in 1818, established in the village of St. Ferdinand. 15 miles north of St. Louis, where they have set up a novitiate, now composed of five novices and several postulants; a thriving seminary. Linking Old and New 415 the resort of the daughters of most of the wealthy inhabitants of this and adjacent states, and a day school for the girls of the poorer class. The state of Louisiana has eighteen ecclesiastical parishes, viz, New Orleans, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. John the Baptist, St. James, St. Michael, Ascension. Assumption. St. Joseph, St. Gabriel at Iber- ville, Baton Rouge, Point Coupee, St. Martin, and St. Mary, (Attacap- pas), St. Landry. St. Charles Borremeus (Opelousas), Avoyelles, Nat- chitoches, to which is to be added Natchez, in the state of Mississippi.'' 3 The members of Du Bourg's caravane and their immediate suc- cessors, who labored in the southern part of the diocese of Louisiana and, in consequence, became members of New Orleans, we will have an opportunity to meet on the occasion of Bishop Rosati's consecration and his subsequent Visitation of that diocese, of which he was appointed administrator. All of them have a share in the upbuilding of the diocese of Louisiana, the mother of the twin Sees of St. Louis and New Orleans. 3 "The Laity's Directory to the Church Services,'' 1822, New York. A copy is in the Chancery's Office of St. Louis Archdiocese. PART TWO THE DIOCESE OF ST. LOUIS BOOK I Bishop Joseph Rosati oj St. Louis Vol. 1-14 PART II BOOK I Chapter 1 THE DIOCESE OF ST. LOUIS In spite of the friendly relations that subsisted from the beginning between Bishop Du Bourg and his Vicar-General Joseph Rosati, there now appeared several ominous clouds on the horizon to disturb the peace and equanimity of both. One was Bishop Du Bourg 's oppo- sition to an early division of the really unmanageable diocese of Louisi- ana; another was the Prelate's urgent proposal to have the Seminary removed to the south, or at least, to have a Seminary of his own in Louisiana ; the last and perhaps the most disquieting one was the ap- parent determination of the New Orlean 's Prelate to withdraw to Lower Louisana the greater number of the St. Louis clergy. As Bishop Du Bourg had already chosen New Orleans as his special field of activity, it seemed highly probable that, at the division of the diocese, he would retain, as he had a right to do, the southern portion for his own. Although the Coadjutor Bishop was rather reticent in regard to Bishop Du Bourg 's frequent calls for northern laborers to southern fields, his faithful brethren of the Congregation spoke out more boldly. Thus, among others, Father John Mary Odin, wrote from the Seminary on August 2, 1823: "On his return to his diocese, (from Washington) our Bishop (Du Bourg) remained a few days with us; he went afterwards to St. Louis and departed almost immediately for New Orleans, where he intends to spend the winter. He has not written for a long time. He is busy visiting his missionaries. It is possible that he will locate his residence in New Orleans or its suburbs. Bishop Rosati, who has been appointed his coadjutor, will administer in Upper Louisiana. The Bishop is bringing nearly all his priests down into Lower Louisiana. It is sad to see so many congregations neglected in the upper part of the state. If Providence does not send help, oh, how many souls will be lost ! "From Pointe-Coupee to Ste. Genevieve there is not one missionary. In St. Louis they have but three priests ; and besides that city and (419) 420 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis the neighboring' villages, they have a college with fifty pupils to look after. Beyond St. Louis there are but two Jesuits. In the whole of Upper Louisiana there are only ten priests, and one a good and holy man, who can scarcely venture out of doors. The cities of Natchez, New Madrid, Cape Girardeau, Kaskaskia, St. Michael, Portage, St. Charles, and several small posts, are entirely abandoned. We have had the misfortune of losing several missionaries who have returned to Europe, and their departure has left a great want in our poor mission. Now and then we are called great distances on sick calls, and very often we cannot go, and these poor people must die with- out the consolations of religion." 1 Bishop Rosati was inclined to justify or, at least, to excuse the Ordinary's seemingly arbitrary acts, although he had repeatedly sent remonstrances: "With regard to the Bishop's disposing of the sub- jects of the Congregation," he writes to Father Baccari, "I have had sometimes to complain that I had not been forewarned of the moves ; but the case was urgent, and I was far away; he never failed to notify me, and when I insisted, he changed his policy. It is but just to add that our own men were the first to ask him for their change, some even without vouchsafing a word to me about it." 2 To a man less generous and considerate than Rosati, it might have appeared that the New Orleans Prelate was providing against the day, when Louisiana should be separated from Missouri, and when Du Bourg should be Bishop of the lower part of the diocese. As early as February 8, 1822, Du Bourg entertained the idea of a Metropolitan See in New Orleans with three suffragans : "As to the erection of another See in the City of St. Louis, Missouri, no one certainly can be pleased Avith it and desire it more than myself, as it means for me relief from immense labors and cares. Still, there is one reason why I delay asking at once for it, namely, the most earnest desire I have to free from all debts and obligations certain quite extensive properties which I have bought as an endow- ment for that See ; I trust that, God helping, I may within a year reach this happy goal. When this is accomplished I shall most gladly resign this part of my solicitude into the hands of the Sovereign Pontiff, hesitating at no sacrifice, in order that the Prelate who is appointed to this new See may be spared the temporal cares and the utmost destitution which were my lot for several years. When this is achieved I will set to work to pave the way for the formation of a new Diocese midway between St. Louis and New Orleans, which may 1 "Anuales de la Propagation de la Foi," vol. 1, 5, pp. 68-77, Records, vol. XIV, p. 187. - Rosati to Baccari, Archives of Procurator, Borne. The Diocese of St. Louis 421 include the State of Mississippi and the Territory of Arkansas. Thus from one Diocese four shall be made out within a few years, and if it please the Holy See, these may constitute a new Ecclesiastical province." 3 But in the course of time it became plain that this flattering dream could not be realized for a long time to come. Whilst, therefore, con- stantly imploring the Sacred Congregation for a Coadjutor for his vast diocese, "he was always particular about the integrity of its present boundaries. His reasons were : the disturbed condition of New Orleans, the poverty of Upper Louisiana, the mutual dependence of New Orleans and St. Louis one upon another. After Rosati's appoint- ment to the Coadjutorship Bishop Du Bourg's importunities in regard to the postponement of the dismemberment, became even more pro- nounced. When Florida was erected into a diocese with Father Michael Portier as its head, Bishop Du Bourg, finds fault with the appoint- ment of the new prelate. "I would not have Your Grace conceive the least suspicion," he wrote to Archbishop Caprano, "that I am sorry of the dismemberment of Florida, from my Diocese, or of the loss of Father M. Portier. That Florida should be taken away from me, I have long petitioned ; and i have never reaped anything but trouble from that wide expanse of territory. As to Father Portier, on account of his levity of mind and his affection of independence, I wish he would go somewhere else, where under the bridle of obedience that levity of his might be checked, and his natural talents might grow to maturity for the greater utility of the Church. But there is no use now of me wishing either of these things, as, in so far at I am personally concerned, I have no other longing and no other thought but for my freedom ; however, even though the bands uniting me to this Church are to be severed, yet I shall never cease to wish it good, and to promote its increase by all means in my power." 4 Whilst Bishop Du Bourg returns to the fruitless charge again and again, Bishop Rosati, expressed himself as well pleased with Father Portier 's elevation: "I have just heard your appointment to the Bishop- ric of Alabama, and at the same time, your refusal. I was glad that you are known in Rome and hope your refusal will not be accepted. Owing to my great affection for you since I have had the privilege to know you, I feel a personal satisfaction at your elevation. I would not speak thus if the Episcopate in this country Avas a source of honors: 3 Archives of Propaganda, cf. Souvay, "Correspondence of Bishop Du Bourg with Propaganda," in St. Louis Catholic Historical Eeview, " vol. II, p. 150. 4 Du Bourg to Cardinal Caprano, Propaganda Archives, Souvay, 1. cit., p. 211. A Life-sketch of Bishop Michael Portier may be found in Richard H. Clarke's, ' ' Lives of the Deceased Bishops, ' ' vol. I, pp. 438-456. 422 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis but crosses, afflictions, privations, humiliations, labors, and sufferings are our lot. Courageously, therefore, take up these crosses, and you will be on the high road to heaven." 3 Bishop Du Bourg was no longer in harmony with his surroundings and felt it keenly, at a time when his pet scheme of another Seminary in Louisiana had failed, through the personal initiative of bis own best friends, Rosati, Flaget and David. Father Odin in his letter just quoted, thus alludes to Bishop Du Bourg 's plan of a new Seminary: "Opelousas, a parish of Loavci- Louisiana, in Avhich there is a community of the Ladies of the Sacred Heart, has made a generous donation for the establishment of a seminary in that parish. The Bishop is deeply interested in this seminary. He wishes to have the Lazarist Fathers there and to make of it a retreat for his priests, who, constantly in the midst of the world, at great distances from one another, feel the necessity of retiring into solitude from time to time, to look after their souls' AA-elfare. " 6 It was at Opelousas that Father Francis Cellini had obtained from Mrs. Charles Smith, a valuable tract of land and the promise of a suitable building for the establishment of a Seminary. This institution Avas to be conducted by the Congregation of the Mission, of which Father Cellini was then a member. Bishop Du Bourg was delighted with the prospect, although the offer contemplated only a ' ' Preparatory Seminary." Father Rosati, the Superior of the Community, at first accepted, and then, revoked the acceptance. Meanwhile Mrs. Smith Avrote her will, in which she bequeathed all her property to Father Cellini, the understanding being that he was to use it for the good of religion and education. The act of the pious lady greatly irritated the Bishop, and caused much very unpleasant comment among the priests and people of Louisiana. Bishop Du Bourg 's strictures on Father Cellini's character at this time, are too passionate and seA-ere to be true. Father De Neckere judged the priest far more kindly; Father Rosati \s report, too, was very mild; and, at a later date, after the departure of Bishop Du Bourg, he did not hesitate to give him a place in the Diocese of St. Louis. These facts go far to shoAv that Father Cellini's conduct Avas not as bad as it had been represented. When one remembers the great praises bestowed on Father Cellini when the latter was in Missouri, and even sometime after he had gone to Grand Coteau, La., one cannot resist the impression that this total reversal of feeling in the Bishop was due to some personal wound receiA'ed directly or indirectly from Cellini. 5 Rosati to Portier, in Rosati 's Diary, "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. XIV, p. 180, note. *> Annales, vol. I, p. 5, Records, vol. XIV, p. 190. The Diocese of St Louis 423 No doubt the latter 's influence on Mrs. Smith, and the donation made by her of the property to Father Cellini, had a great deal to do with the Bishop's judgment. In consequence of this notoriety Father Cellini asked and obtained permission to go to Rome, where he formally left the Congregation of the Missions. "Had Father Cellini been less precipitate, and followed my wishes, everything would have been done without noise, scandal and opposition," is Bishop Rosati's final judg- ment. 7 But, though frustrated for the time, the idea of a seminary in the South had now became fixed in the mind of Bishop Du Bourg. At Bishop Rosati's consecration in Donaldsonville the two prelates discussed the matter in all its bearings. A donation of 1,000 acres of good land had already been received through the generosity of Father Bernard, the retired Capuchin at La Fourche: $4,000.00 were offered by one of the priests of the diocese, for the erection of the buildings. The proposed location appeared to Bishop Rosati as "one of the most de- sirable in Louisiana." As Superior of the Lazarists, he immediately submitted the offer to Father Baccari at Rome, with his own recom- mendation. In the course of a year, however, the plan took on a new and dis- quieting form : the actual suppression, namely, of the Seminary at the Barrens in favor of the new Seminary in Southern Louisiana. In the summer of 1825, the Coadjutor Bishop was requested by Bishop Du Bourg to meet him at Assumption, La., for a most important con- sultation. The topics discussed were the straitened circumstances of the Seminary at the Barrens, which seemed to necessitate its discon- tinuance, as well as the pressing needs of the South, and the favorable opportunity to secure the future of the Church in Louisiana and in Missouri. The Coadjutor could not see the matter in this light. "His soul was pierced to the quick," as he himself expresses it, and lie represented to the eager prelate the dismal condition into which the Church of Missouri would be plunged by this move, depriving it of all spiritual help. But Bishop Du Bourg retorted with vehemence, that the refusal to consent was tantamount to bringing ruin upon the whole Diocese. Thereupon the gentle Son of St. Vincent consented, though reluctantly, and wrote to the Vicar-General of the Congregation for his approval. This occurred in August 1825. Bishop Rosati spent the next few months in deep anxiety concerning the outcome of the matter. 8 On meeting the Prelate on November 8th., at St. John the Baptist's La., he urged the difficulties besetting the contemplated foundation: and after weighing them carefully, both came to the conclusion that i Holweek, " Pastoral-Blatt, " vol. 59, pp. 82 ss. 8 Diary, August 16, 1825. 424 History of I lit Archdiocese of St. Louis it was of the utmost importance, before anything else be done, that Bishop Rosati should find out what the priests of the Congregation in Missouri thought about the change. Upon his return to the Barrens, Bishop Rosati, on Friday, November 25th, assembled all the priests of the Congregation, that is, Father De Neckere, Assist, nit, Fathers Dahmen, Permoli and Odin, and manifested to them the Bishop's desire of erecting another Seminary in Louisiana, and the utility which might be derived therefrom for Religion in general, and their Congregation in particular; the means which the Bishop thinks of employing to realize it; the very great difficulties to be encountered in employing these means, and the harm eventually to result from this project for the Seminary at the Barrens and for practically all the Catholics of the State of Missouri and of the neighboring country, owing to the lack of priests. All these things being duly weighed before God, it was unanimously resolved that the Bishop of New Orleans should be begged to postpone the erection of that new Seminary in Louisiana, until they had the money and the men necessary for the undertaking. Bishop Rosati there- fore, wrote to Bishop Du Bourg for that purpose. It may be of interest here to learn how the Coadjutor's council met the proposals of the Bishop of New Orleans. Bishop Du Bourg had told Rosati, that, in order to make the foundation of the Seminary a success : 1) he intended to buy a house and a plantation, that is, cultivated land, adjacent to the uncultivated land which had been donated for the foundation of the Seminary: this purchase, might be concluded by the immediate payment of $3,000 and the obligation to pay a yearly life-interest of $1,200 to the owner, who is a man 74 years of age, but enjoying good health. 2) In order to have the funds necessary to build the College and furnish it, he would ask a loan from the State Bank : this establishment exacts an interest of 7 per cent and the annual pay- ment of one-fifth of the principal. 3) To put in cultivation the land on which sugar-cane may be raised, he would enter into partnership with some one who would attend to the cultivation ; the surplus realized over and above the expenses would be equally divided. All this appeared very objectionable to Rosati and he communicated his misgivings to the Bishop, telling him that, before coming to any definite conclusion he would have to consult the priests on his return to the Barrens. 9 Upon these propositions, the members of the Council made the following observations : " 1 ) It would be dangerous for us to run so much into debt ; crops are uncertain ; we might expose ourselves to bankruptcy, and would be forced to sell everything to the disgrace of the Congrega- tion and Religion at large. 2) The number of our priests is too small to be divided into two houses ; it will be difficult to find one capable of 9 Eosati to Baccari, cf. "Catholic Historical Eeview, " vol. Ill, p. 177. The Diocese of St. Louis 425 being Superior ; this division will oblige us to withdraw the priests from the missions where they are now so fruitfully employed ; again, it would be unjust to do violence to the reasonable inclination these confreres have for the works of the holy ministry, if Ave were to compel them to spend the greater part of their lives in teaching reading, writing, spelling, etc. 3) It looks like downright injustice to abandon Upper Louisiana, that is to say, the State of Missouri, and practically to deprive of workers a country where there is such immense fruit to harvest." 10 This decision was communicated to Father Baccari and to Bishop Du Bourg. How it was received by the latter is not known, yet it must have nettled the all too sensitive prelate, in a letter from New Orleans, dated December 9th, 1825, Du Bourg sadly notifies his Coadjutor of his Fiat to the deliberation of the priests of the Seminary, deciding to postpone undertaking the establishment of another Seminary, in Lower Louisiana, and then gives vent to his feelings: "As I have only a few years to live, I shall probably not see the extinction of the Diocese ; and even if I do see it, I shall have nothing to reproach myself with." But gentle and unselfish as Bishop Rosati was, he would not act upon his own judgment ; though seconded by that of his colaborers ; but laid the matter before the saintly Bishop Flaget and his Coadjutor Bishop David for their impartial decision to be sent to Rome. Their letter to Propaganda was couched in the following strong language : 1. My Coadjutor and I firmly believe it is not only expedient, but urgent, to make the division : because, until it is made, all the zeal and talents of Bishop Rosati are kept, as it were, in concealment ; and for this cause, the time limit stated in the Bull for the division ought not to be extended. 2. Our firm conviction is, that the projects explained by Bishop Du Bourg to Bishop Rosati are prejudicial in every respect. If, in- deed, the transfer of the Seminary takes place, the blow will be fatal to Religion in Upper Louisiana, entailing a loss that cannot be easily repaired. 3. We are convinced, moreover, that the project is fraught with danger, because it involves the contracting of debts without any hope of being able to meet them. Furthermore, we believe it necessary that the division should be made as soon as possible, so that Bishop Rosati may have the right to call back such clergymen as he may deem fit to help him in his administration. This recall will have, of course, to be made with prudence ; but it is absolutely inperative. This is our conclusion grounded principally on the perfect knowl- edege we have of Bishop Du Bourg. When Father Martial, V. G., arrives in Rome, you may get more information touching Bishop Rosati 's Rosati to Baccari, 1. cit., pp. 177 and 178. 426 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis situation, which will enable you to take prompt measures to extricate him from his painful position." 11 The measure of Bishop Du Bourn's troubles and bitter disappoint- ments was now full to overflowing. He could bear the strain no longer, but he wrapped his intentions in secrecy. On Thursday, April 20th, 1826, he arrived at the Barrens and in- formed the Coadjutor that he intended to leave for Europe in the interest of his New Seminary in La Fourche. Both Bishops went to Ste. Genevieve on their way to St. Louis. On Ascension day he preached at the Cathedral and immediately after Mass went to the steamboat, to which he would allow no one to accompany him, on his way to Prance. From New York he wrote to his Coadjutor, and on June 1st, sailed for Havre, never to return. At the request of the departing Prelate, Bishop Rosati had gone down to Louisiana, returning to the Barrens on July 19th, to celebrate the Feast of St. Vincent de Paid. Resuming his ordinary duties at the Seminary, he was deeply surprised and grieved when on October 5th, he received from Father Niel, now his agent in Europe, the intelli- gence of Bishop Du Bourg's resignation. At first Bishop Rosati re- garded the report as a pure invention of the papers at home and abroad. Bishop Du Bourg had not dropped a single hint as to resigning : in fact, his conversations with and his' letters to the Coadjutor had all been of a hopeful nature. But on November 4th, Bishop Rosati, who had gone to St. Louis for the consecration of Bishop Portier, re- ceived the Pontifical Brief notifying him, that Bishop Du Bourg's resignation had been accepted, that Louisiana had been divided, and that he himself had been appointed administrator of both. Bishop Rosati at once informed all the pastors of what had occurred: "Two briefs wherewith His Holiness has honored me confirm most unfortu- nately the rumor which for several weeks has caused me very pain- ful anxiety. Bishop Du Bourg has actually resigned, and his resigna- tion has been accepted. The former Diocese of New Orleans, as Pius VII of holy memory had decided by the brief of my election as coadju- tor of the same Diocese, has just been divided: the one part including the states of Louisiana and Mississippi, and the other the state of Missouri and adjacent territories. The See of the one shall be New- Orleans; and of the other St. Louis. The Holy Father has entrusted to me, until further orders, the care of them both and grants me the necessary faculties. You will certainly share in my regrets for the departure of the illustrious Prelate to whom the Diocese owes its priests, its colleges, ii Flaget to Baceari, January 1, 1826. The Diocese of St. Louis 427 its monasteries, its Seminary, in a word, all the good done in it since Divine Providence had confided it to him." 12 The question as to what See Bishop Rosati was ultimately to occupy as his own, was for the present left in abeyance. But it was clear that a decision must soon be made. A mere wish of His Holiness would appear to the Administrator as a command. And yet Bishop Rosati felt that his going to New Orleans would be fatal to him and to the diocese. He decided once more to seek counsel from his trusted friend, at Bardstown : but in the meantime he wrote a letter to Father Baccari, stating the reasons, why he should be left at St. Louis. The letter is dated January 6, 1827, and reads in part: "My motives are the following : "I am now perfectly inured to the climate of Missouri, whereas that of Louisiana does not agree with me, as I have experienced in my various trips there : as I am now rather stout, the excessive heat prevailing there is so hard on me, that I am then unable to study or apply myself to anything: and moreover it occassions me great incon- venience. "New Orleans is a large city, the population of which is for the most part made up of unbelievers and other enemies of Religion. There is needed there a man capable of speaking the language eloquently, so as to impose respect for the Word of God, and not expose it to the danger of being scoffed at in the newspapers by such as go to listen to the preacher, ut capiant < um in sermone. Now, I have not the talent re- quisite for a ministry so important and, in that city, so difficult. On the other hand, in Missouri people are more religious, they come to church with upright intentions, and on that account, no such bad effects are to be feared as in New Orleans, and some good is actually done; moreover all here know and esteem me." 13 In the depth of winter, January 7th, Bishop Rosati with Brother Blanka, started for St. Genevieve, where Father Dahmen joined them. Their journey was most difficult and trying, but they arrived safe and sound at Bardstown on January 19th. Their welcome there was cordial. All the loved and hallowed spots in the neighborhood, the Cathedral, St. Thomas Seminary, Loretto, Nazareth, were visited. In long and earnest conferences the subject so new to Bishop Rosati 's heart was discussed by the three prelates, Flaget, David, and Rosati and the con- clusion was reached that Bishop Rosati should decline New Orleans, and that the friends should write to Rome on the matter. The home- ward journey was to touch Vincennes. At Nazareth the Bishop of St. Louis in spe took leave of Bishop David, and at Bethany two days 12 Rosati 's letter to the Pastors of St. Louis and New Orleans, November 6, L826, in " Catholic Historical Review," vol. Ill, pp. 181 and 182. 13 Archives of the Procurator General C. M., Rome, in Souvay, 1. cit., p. 183. 428 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis later, of Bishop Flaget. Here it was that took place the touching scene described by Archbishop Spalding so characteristic of the faith, humility and child-like simplicity and candor of the two prelates. "So deeply," says the historian, "was Bishop Rosati impressed Avith the sanctity of his reverend friend, that on taking his leave he fell on his knees, and refused to arise until he would receive a blessing. Bishop Flaget, taken by surprise, on the impulse of the moment, imitated the example of the other prelate ; and the scene closed with a mutual benediction imparted to each other, and a parting embrace." 14 Bishop Du Bourg, who soon after his arrival in France became Bishop of Montauban, was enlisted by Bishop Rosati in favor of his relief from the threatening burden. Under date of May 1st, 1827, he wrote from his new episcopal city to the Cardinal Prefect of the propaganda : "I regret to see, Your Eminence, that the extreme modesty of Bishop Rosati inspires him with an unsuratountable aversion for the See of New Orleans. He is convinced that the position requires talents more distinguished than his. I do not share his opinion, and am con- vinced, that no other Bishop may do there more good than he. It is not so much eloquence, as solid knowledge, profound wisdom, and a virtue above every suspicion, which are demanded in that important office. The first of these qualities would perhaps only invite censure ; the others have already, won for him the affection and respect of all. "I realize none the less whatever deference is due to so marked a repugnance in a Prelate of such sterling virtues. His constitution, moreover, does not seem suited for the scorching heat prevailing in that climate during half of the year; and his preservation is too precious to Religion to permit to expose him to too great a danger. "There is only, that I can see, one means to reconcile all the in- terests at stake, namely to leave to Bishop Rosati, for an unlimited length of time, the administration of both parts of that great Diocese, and to give him a Coadjutor to assist him or supply his place in Lower Louisiana. All my previous letters to the S. Congregation expressed this wish, and I am glad that he himself is saying the same. For in- deed, with all his modesty, he could scarcely be blind to the fact that no other man will be able for a long time to unite the hearts and assure the submission of a clergy made up of all kinds of men, ever ready to be divided or to take liberties ; and his office of Superior of the Con- gregation of the Mission gives him advantages which no other can have. "He proposes as Coadjutor, Father Leo De Neckere, a priest of his Congregation, native of Flanders, who has already spent well-nigh ten years in Louisiana, and is exceptionally remarkable by his knowl- edge, his virtues, and above all, the gift of a most distinguished eloquence 14 Spalding, "Sketches of the Early Catholic Missions of Kentucky," p. 261. The Diocese of St. Louis 429 both in English and in French. Two objections, however, might be raised against him, his youth and his health. He is scarcely twenty-six years of age, but his outward appearance, his gravity and his wisdom are of a man of forty. His health, undermined by application and sedentary work, suffered very much from the cold and dry climate of Upper Louisiana; but it benefits by the damp heat of New Orleans; from this point of view, he is just the reverse of Bishop Rosati. So. as there is, after all, question of conferring upon him only a dependent authority, this choice seems well-advised. Several secondary reasons might confirm the wisdom of it. Father De Neckere is universally respected by his brother-priests and the people, and as he is Flemish, it might probably attract soon to the Mission a certain number of his fellow-countrymen, who, of all nationalities, are those who are succeed- ing best. "I am afraid only that persuasive means may not be able to de- termine him to accept the weighty burden of the Episcopate, which is doubly heavy in a country like Louisiana. Probably nothing short of a peremptory command of His Holiness will be able to prevail upon him." 15 This was really the course pursued by the Sacred Congregation. Bishop Rosati was appointed to the newly erected See of St. Louis on May 20th, 1827, but continued in the office of Administrator of the diocese of New Orleans until August 4th, 1829, when Father De Neckere, notwithstanding his remonstrance, was elected Bishop of the southern See. Owing to continued ill health Bishop De Neckere 's consecration could not take place until June 24th, 1830. Bishop Louis William Valentine Du Bourg, in 1833, was promoted to the Archiepiscopal See of Besancon where he died December 12th. 1833. There can be no doubt that the Church in the Mississippi Valley is deeply indebted to the strange combination of romantic hope- fulness and almost fool-hardy enterprise, with genuine piety, solid learn- ing and a deep sense of justice, as embodied in Bishop Du Bourg. The real harvest was reserved for others : But the praise of having pre- pared the soil and cast the seed into the furrows belongs to him. Well may his heart have exulted at the close of his thorny career in the thought of his small beginnings, of his triumphs and of the glorious promise of his work, as he did in his retrospective letter to Abbe Lespinasse : "Feeling that it was impossible to plunge into my episcopal city (New Orleans) without compromising, from the very start, the holy character and authority with which I was invested, I decided to begin 15 Du Bourg, to Propaganda, May 1, 1827. Propaganda Archives, ef. Souvay, Correspondence of Du Bourg, in "St. Louis Catholic Historical Review," vol. Ill, pp. 219 and 220. Sketch of Bishop Du Bourg 's Life in Clarke, "Lives of the De- ceased Bishops," vol. I, pp. 205 ss. 430 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis operations by attacking the weakest points of my diocese. Thence, as from a stronghold in which I could muster my forces I would sally forth, and having conquered the surrounding territory, the citadel wouli finally be obliged to surrender. St. Louis and the immense territory of the Missouri were the first scene of my maneuvers. I had difficulties here, of all kinds to struggle with. Profound ignorance, and its at- tendant evils, general corruption, lack of morals, dire poverty. I had not whereon to lay my head, and I was accompanied by fifty-three brothers in arms. "We fell back into the woods, to serve as a shelter. We laid the foundation of an edifice, which after four or five years of trial, we had the happiness of seeing completed. The fields were cultivated; the live stock increased; a mill was built. From this center, my pioneers went forth in all directions. They cleared the country. They even penetrated into the chief city, were received with confidence, and finally succeeded in disposing the inhabitants to accept their leader. "This seminary, finally established in Missouri, I turned my at- tention to St. Louis. I renovated the dilapidated parsonage. I built a school house, which was taken in charge by my clergy. They also contributed to its support, the parish giving absolutely no aid. Each one contributed so much, however, towards the construction of a church. We established the Ladies of the Sacred Heart, in the neighborhood, and their institution was flourishing, for a time. Then, on account of great poverty in that section of the city, it languished, but is now en- joying its former success. This convent is in a beautiful locality. They have a fine house, a church, etc., and accomplish a great deal of good. They have a great many poor girls and also some little savages. I had the happiness of establishing the Jesuits in the same quarter, sometime after, in a very pretty house, which I gave them. They are seven in number, Avithout counting the brothers. They will surely do great good in the future, but they are destitute of everything, save what they can raise themselves. I trust that Providence will come to their aid. God never abandons those who work for Him, though He sends them trials, sometimes, to try their faith and increase their merit. The government pays them for the support of a few savages. In order to secure a piece of bread for the bishop and his clergy, I bought some waste land near the city, but through lack of laborers to work upon it, it produces nothing as yet. It will perhaps, be a source of revenue in the future, as will be also about ten other lots, in the city itself. To sum up, five years ago, I arrived for the first time in New Orleans.""' 16 "Annales de la Propagation de la Foi," vol. II, pp. 403 and 409. Eecords, vol. XIV, pp. 163 and 164. Concerning Bishop Leo De Neckere see Clarke, vol. T, pp. 518 ss. Chapter 2 ROSATI'S VISITATION IN THE DIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS One of the chief duties of a Bishop is the visitation of his diocese at regular intervals. Accordingly Louisiana claimed the Adminis- trator's immediate attention. 1 Early in March 1827, he had gone to New Orleans to organize an Episcopal Council, composed of Father Sedella, the Vicar-General, and Fathers Moni, Richard, Borgna and Jeanjean as members. The first meeting was held on Thursday, March 29th. On June 16th, the Administrator returned to his own flock in Mis- souri : but in November he started once more for the South, to set everything in order pending the coming of the new Bishop. The journey down the river proved a vivid exemplification of St. Paul's "perils bj r water." Of the events which marked the journey the Bishop's Diary affords a narrative worth quoting here : "At about two o'clock, the boat, which was going downstream at quite a rapid pace ran into a huge snag lying some four feet under water; and such was the impact that a hole was torn in the craft, so that the latter filled rapidly. The wheels, now deep in the water, could no longer obey the force of steam. Then the helmsman turned all his might to directing the boat, now full to overflowing, towards the shore ; providentially it happened that we soon reached in the attempt a part of the river where the water was only nine feet deep; there the boat stopped, resting on the bottom, and so we were snatched from what seemed imminent death. When we were told by the Captain that all danger of death was now over, we went down into a rowboat which carried us to the bank of the river ; and there, after we had somewhat recovered from the stupor caused us by the imment danger of death which we had just escaped, we had to think about the necessary means of building up some huts to spend the night and the following days. For we were on a desert river-bank, and there was no hope of saving our boat. Accordingly before night we had some huts erected which we roofed with pieces of linen and of cloth." i For a detailed account of this Episcopal Visitation of the Diocese of Mew Orleans, see the article of Dr. Souvay in ' ' St. Louis Catholic Historical Eeview, ' ' vol. 1, pp. 215, ss. As most of the facts are taken from Rosati's Diary, March 16-29, 1827, we need not mention the source of information for the various state- ments. (431) 432 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis The boat is destroyed, and out of its planks a few huts are con- structed. At last, ten days after this shipwreck, the passengers are taken up by the Steamer Lafayette, with the Amazon in tow. Nine days later, December 28th, when about twelve miles from New Orleans, the Laf- ayette caught fire, and it was feared she was to be the prey of the flames. Fire had broken out in the hold. As soon as the alarm was sounded, Ave all rushed to the Amazon near-by. But our fear did not last long, for in a short while the crew-men were able to put out the fire completly. "We reached New Orleans about 3 p.m. On Monday the Episcopal Visitation began at the Parish of the Ascension, Donaldsonville, where Father Joseph Tichitoli was Pastor. On the following Wednesday the Bishop, accompanied by Father John Bouillier, reached the parish of the Assumption. Returning to Donaldsonville for the Christmas festivities, he jour- neyed to St. Josephs, seven leagues from the Assumption, where Father Audizio received him with great joy. Returning from St. Josephs to Assumption and Donaldsonville he started, on January 4, 1828, for St. Gabriels, Iberville, where Father Paul de Saint Pierre had spent his declining years. A Solemn Requiem Mass was celebrated for the repose of the soul of the former pastor of Cahokia, Ste. Genevieve and St. Gabriels. On January 8th, the Bishop in company with Father Eugene Michaud, the pastor of St. Gabriels and Father Bouillier, set out for Baton Rouge, the home of Father Anthony Blanc. Illness compelled the Bishop to prolong his stay at Baton Rouge. On the following Saturday he was at last able to take his departure on the boat The Lady of the Lake, which took him and his companion Father Bouillier to St. Michael's where they arrived on Sunday, rather late in the morning, during the celebration of the parochial High Mass. Following the Visitation, Father Auguste Jeanjean was appointed Confessor and Superior of the Sacred Heart Convents of St. Michael's and Grand Coteau, while Father Dussossoy was officially Rector of St. Michael's. Once more, on the morning of Friday, January 25, Bishop Rosati and his fidus Achates, Father John Bouillier, crossed the Mississippi; they were headed this time towards the parish of St. John the Baptist, on the German Coast, where they arrived in mid-afternoon. The evening and the next day were given to rest and to the enjoyment of the whole- hearted hospitality of the pastor Father Louis Mina and his guest for the time being, Father De Angelis. From St. John the Baptist the Administrator, together with his inseparable Father Bouillier and Father De Angelis, boarded the Paul Jones, for New Orleans. Thus ended the first round of Visitations. Rosati's Visitation in the Diocese of New Orleans 4:!:! Trouble had been brewing in the City during the Bishop 's absence. "The Trustees," Bishop Rosati tells us, "led and persuaded by one Mr. Cavelier, had been circulating among the Catholics a petition which they requested the latter to sign, and which they meant to present to the Legislature of Louisiana, in order to obtain from that body that a law be passed enabling the same Trustees to refuse henceforth any pastors in whose appointment they did not concur. I summoned to- gether to a meeting all the clergy actually present in New Orleans; the Right Rev. Michael Portier, Bishop of Oleno and Vicar Apostolic of Alabama and Florida, and the Right Rev. Bonaventure Esperon, Bishop of Jericho in partibus, who happened to be then in the city, were pleased to grace our meetings by their presence. There were at this meeting the Very Rev. Anthony de Sedella, V. G., and Pastor, the Reverend Fathers Moni, Richard, Borgna, De Angelis, Maenhaut, Ganihl, Per- moli, Bouillier, Medina and Cunsade. Having read the aforementioned petition, I asked; 1. Whether or not it was in conformity with the doctrine and discipline of the Catholic Church; 2. Whether or not a Rector elected by the Trustees was to be regarded as an interloper. It was answered unanimously: 1. that the petition was contrary to the doctrine and discipline of the Catholic Church ; 2. that the priest elected to a pastorship by the Trustees should be held to be an interloper. Then it was decreed that the Proceedings of this meeting should be written in full and signed by all present, and that an authentic copy of these proceedings should be sent to the Trustees by a Committee made up of Father Anthony de Sedella, Moni and Maenhaut. Accord- ingly, minutes of the meeting were at once written by Father Ganihl and signed by all present." The Administrator did not believe his action in the matter should be ended by the holding of this meeting ; he made it a point to see some of the members of the Senate of Louisiana, and to impress upon them the idea that the petition circulated by the Trustees was in opposition to the laws of the Catholic Church, and that, therefore, the State law- makers could not legislate on the matter without violating the Consti- tion of the United States which guarantees the freedom of all worship. In explanation of Bishop Rosati's action the following passages from his letter to the Cardinal Prefect of the Propaganda will be service- able : I am under the impression that Your Eminence is well aware that The temporalities of all the parishes of the Diocese of New Orleans, and their revenues are administered by a Board of laymen, commonly called Marguilliers (Trustees), elected by the Catholics of the Parish. Whatever is done by these Trustees is approved and held valid before 434 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louix civil law. Now it occurs quite frequently that men who have no idea whatever of religion, moved; by the Inst of authority, present their candidatures to such an office, and are actually elected. A majority of Trustees of that kind, who are administering the revenues of the church of New Orleans, sent in to the State Legislature a petition, which they persuaded quite a number of the Catholics of New Orleans to sign, asking the privilege to refuse to accept any Pastor in whose appoint- ment or election they, or the whole Catholic people, had no part. The argument of the Trustees is that in a Republic the people ought to enjoy the same rights as are exercised by kings and princes in monarchies. But they do not advert to the fact that those rights are in no way inherent in the monarchs or in the Republic officials; but were bestowed by the Church herself, as a recognition of some impor- tant temporal benefits conferred upon her by these monarchs and princes. As, on the other hand, there has never been made here any such concession, and there is no reason why any should ever be made, because the Government has never granted nor can grant any benefices, or any privileges to the Church, without violating the Constitution, one does not see whence this right to make appointments could ever arise. They argue that the jus patronatus gives to the patron the faculty to appoint to parishes and benefices; but this jus patronatus is granted by the Church to the Founders, not to the parishioners. Even here, in New Orleans, this right was not granted to that Spaniard who built the Cathedral at his own expense ; nor was it ever asked by him ; therefore, even though his heirs should claim the exercise of this right, they could not, because prescription to the contrary has intervened. Moreover, what has not the Church to fear, if ever the election of a pastor should depend on laymen with no ecclesiastical knowledge whatever, men of whom scarcely a few have any religious sense, and some are openly haters of religion? God avert this calamity, the worst that could befall this Diocese ! ' ' 2 Bishop Rosati then requests a declaration by the Holy Father on the matter in order to settle once for all the disturbances constantly raised by the marguilliers. "For," says he "the Constitution of the United States, and of the State of Louisiana provides that nothing can be enacted which would tend to impede the free exercise of religion. Accordingly as soon as it will be proven, and will be made evident that it is contrary to the principles and to the discipline of the Catholic Church, that the people of any parish refuse to receive a Pastor, because 2 The draft of this letter is preserved in the Archives of St. Louis Archdiocese. Rosati's Visitation in the Diocese of New Orleans 435 they had no part in his appointment or election, ipso facto any con- cession made on this point by the Legislature will be null and void" 3 It was an appeal to the law-makers the enemies of the Church had made : Bishop Rosati countered their move by an appeal to the supreme law of the land, the Constitution of the United States. Who should win could no longer be doubtful. In any case the Bishop's courage and firmness, so different from his predecessors vacillating policy, quelled the incipient revolution for the time being ; so that the visitation of the diocese could proceed in peace. On February 11th, the Bishop always with Father Bouiller, boarded the Integrity, bound for Western Louisiana. Slowly the craft plowed its way along, passing on February 12, in sight of St. Michaels 's and, the next day entering the Bayou Plaquemine. Up the stream they proceeded that day and the whole of the next day ; and about night- fall they reached the Caron landing, where they disembarked and spent the night. Early the next morning Father Flavius H. Rossi, Pastor of Opelousas, came to fetch our Apostolic traveler to his residence, three miles away, and after a suitable refection put them on their way to the tOAvn of Vermillionville, which was already beginning to be popularly designated by the name, destined to supplant the former, of Lafayette. Before night the weary travelers had reached the Rectory of St. John the Evangelist's and were enjoying the hospitality of the pastor, Father Lawrence Peyretti. From Vermillionville to St. Martinville, the dis- tance is only fourteen miles ; it was easily covered in the afternoon of the 18th. Old Saint Martins, the quaint Acadian village, amid its venerable oaks, from whose branches garlands of Spanish moss, and mystic mistletoe flaunted, is one of our Country's most venerated shrines of poetry. But Bishop Rosati's visit to St. Martin was no pilgrimage to poetry's shrine, but an errand of mercy. "For," he tells us, "the pastor, Father Marcel Borella, had been lying abed for three months with his thigh-bone broken, and five days ago, as he was beginning to convalesce, the thigh was broken again. We were most kindly received by him, and I could not but admire the sweetness of his character and his patience." Two full days the Bishop edified himself at the bedside of the pious rector. St. Charles du Grand Coteau was the next parish scheduled to be visited. From St. Martin the Administrator had first to retrace his steps to Vermillionville, whence he started on Friday, February 22, Just on the bridge crossing the Bayou Carencro, the horse draAving the 3 Rosati to Cardinal Prefect oi' Propaganda. 436 History of the Archdiocese of St. Louis episcopal carriage fell, and it was only by the narrowest of margins that horse, carriage and travelers escaped being thrown into the Bayou. At the Rectory of St. Charles, Bishop Rosati was at home, as the Pastor. Father John Rosti, was a Lazarist. Moreover, the prelate was keenly interested in the welfare of the new Sacred Heart Convent of Grand Cotean, which was as yet quite a modest establishment — five choir Sisters, and one lay Sister; the Academy numbered thirty-three pupils — indeed during the whole length of his sojourn at St. Charles, he made the Convent chapel his Episcopal oratory : Particularly worthy of notice is the fact, carefully recorded in his Diary, that on Friday, February 29, at half past three in the after- noon, he solemnly administered the Sacrament of Baptism to three of the Academy girls converted from Protestantism : Mary Elizabeth Gordon and Martha Frances Bell, both twelve years old, and Mary Clarissa Curtis, nine j'ears of age. All three had obtained the consent of their parents. After a full week at St. Charles, it was now the turn of Father Rossi, pastor of Opelousas, to entertain the Administrator. Father Rossi, indeed, went to St. Charles to bring the Prelate to his home and to the new church of St. Landry which he was to consecrate. Although the journey by a driving rain and through muddy roads had been rather trying, still the Prelate was, the next morning, second Sunday in Lent, ready for work. March 4, was the day appointed for the conse- cration of the new church of Opelousas, and everything was in readiness. All the requirements of the Pontifical were carried out, Father Flavius Rossi, the pastor, and Father Bouiller, C. M., acting as assistants to the Bishop. There was, too, an immense crowd of people in attendance, and the Prelate marks with wonderment that there had been counted no less, than five hundred saddle-horses, and thirty carriages of every description parking around the church. In the meantime the Mississippi River had risen to extreme height and broken the levees at Point Couppee and Iberville ; all the low lands were flooded seven feet deep. The Bishop left for Donaldsonville and spent two weeks there in company of Father Joseph Tichitoli. Thence he went down the river on a passing flat-boat and arrived at New Orleans on Holy Thursday. On the 12th of May, Bishop Rosati boarded the steamship Jubilee Captain Price, bound for the Barrens where he arrived on the 22nd. This visitation of the parishes of Louisiana was Bishop Rosati 's fond adieu to the priests wdth whom he had been connected so long both officially and in holy friendship. Most of them he was not to see Rosati's Visitation in the Diocese of New Orleans 437 again in life. But he remained in charge of the diocese as Administrator, and consequently took a lively interest in its affairs. The closing words of his letter to the Cardinal Prefect of the Propaganda manifest his deep interest. "I have now gone through the two Dioceses committed to my care, and made the Visitation of almost all the parishes. Everywhere, in the midst of difficulties which confront Religion in this Country. I have found ample motives to extol and bless the infinite goodness of God, for the graces which He bestows so abundantly upon the Faith. During the last six months I have confirmed more than twelve hundered persons, all of whom had gone to communion and were in excellent dispositions; everywhere the word of God is bringing fruit — more or less — , in patience; everywhere the Protestants show veneration towards the Cath- olic religion and its priests, and in many places some Protestants embrace the Catholic Faith ; all are willing to listen to the word of God preached by the Catholic priests ; nay more, I myself, after preach- ing in French to the Catholics, was asked by Protestants to preach in English. There are, in the two Dioceses, nine religious Communities and Monasteries, two of men and seven of women : in them piety and regu- larity are flourishing and their success is evidenced by the number of their pupils. New churches, either of stone or brick, have been erected ; in the Diocese of St. Louis two are not yet completely finished, but three are finished in the Diocese of New Orleans; of these I have already consecrated one, and shall consecrate another in a short while." 4 -i From Kosati's letter to the Cardinal Prefect of the Propaganda. Chapter .'1 PROGRESS OF A DECADE After the visitation and confirmation trip in Louisiana, Bishop Rosati, with energy and prudence, devoted himself to the reorganization of his own diocese and especially his episcopal city. From New Orleans he had written on January 7, 1827: "The diocese of St. Louis which includes the State of Missouri and the territory of Arkansas, is much more prosperous than New Orleans, although destitute of the means necessary for the support of priests. The Bishop has as yet no income; he has only land; but the outlay necessary to render it of value, is greater than the revenue it brings in. The church is burdened with debts contracted in building it. I have sent Father Niel to beg for help from the charitable in Europe. I trust his mission will be successful." 1 The financial difficulties of the church in St. Louis dated from the early days of Bishop Du Bourg. Immediately on his arrival in the city liberal subscriptions had been obtained for the purpose of building a worthy house of God in place of the ramshackle building that had served the people for divine worship since the early Spanish days. The ex- pense of the ' ' Cathedral ' ' was very great, and funds were soon lacking to continue building operations. Various circumstances contributed to this depressing fact, among them the money-stringency that hampered trade and reduced the number of inhabitants who had or might have subscribed. Every nerve was strained to put the church under roof; the commissioners giving their bond to the workmen for the amounts due Them. As no new sources of revenue opened themselves, the commission- ers, Auguste and Pierre Chouteau and Bernard Pratte and others who. as we have already shown, had become personally responsible for the church debt of $4500, obtained from the Legislature the authorization "to sell at public sale by the sheriff, so much of the church block in St. Louis as was not used for Church and Cemetery purposes, as would be necessary to indemnify them for the amount they had advanced and had become personally responsible for in the erection of the Brick church to the extent of $4500.00.- The sale of the southern half of the church-block inherited by the parish of St. Louis from its founder, was effected: the northern half with the church and the cemetery remained in control of the trustees, i "Annates de la Propagation