PHOSPHORESCENT ZING SULFIDE BY AI>BERT H. BARNETT THESIS FOR THK DEGREE O E B A G H E L O R O F S C I E N C E IN C H E M IC', A L E N G 1 N F. E R 1 N G COl.LEGE OF LIBEHAF ARTS AND S(’1 !;nCFS UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1S)22 - ^ '' .'■ ;'^ t;^^w>vrr:,, ^ ^;v' " „ .? V.X- ':'p- i‘ ■ : . ., C't'^^ . I, ./ '-t i i'\ ■ ‘ ■ i'! -v-' ''Ji( j'‘^r'r r \ i 1 I ' i •< i f i ■i V j i . i i I ) I ■! ,1 I i t i ■■I ■ ’ V . j i ■• ■ ; '• ' ' ' . ' ■ -c- • , ' • " t I ■ -V ’ , ....I '. I i> I \> 1 .!*». \ ‘ i "* 1 ' ' •■->■00*. J,. ' . . ■ •♦5 ■ / . ^ '' . ■ ' •» ■ ’ .-'J _■ ' ' ' * * ■ » • * I* ^ -f w/ , . . f , . W ‘IK' r'/ i >; i r i,. r J' I ^ V u ! 11 1 2 . Canton's Phosphorus, He also found that upon heating his compound after excitation, a stronger phosphorescence was 2 produced but of shorter duration. A few years later beebeek discovered that short wave lengths produced the most intense illumination when used for excitation and that red light quenched the intensity. The compounds that have been found to phosphoresce with the greatest intensity are the sulfides of the alkali earths, HaS, Gab, Srb and zinc sulfide. However, the liter- ature on the subject is characterized by its contradictory character and vagueness. in this work it was endeavored to determine the best method of preparing phosphorescent zinc sulfide and also to study the conditions that caused phos- phorescence In 1686, bidot^ prepared phosphorescent zinc sulfide by heating the crystalline sulfide for 4-5 hours in an atmos- 4 phere of sulfur dioxide. Two years later, Verneuil discov- ered that he could obtain a phosphorescent compound by heat- ing precipitated zinc sulfide to redness in the preseence of alkali chlorides or the sulfides of other metals. In 1699, 5 Moure lo found some natural zinc sulfide crystals v^hich phos'-'horesced after exposure to light. This led to mi-ch discussion as to the probable exi stance of pure phosphorescent substances and just what impurities were necessary for its production. E3q)erlments conducted independently by Grune and 7 Hofmann & fiucca, in 1904, on methods of producing phosphor- ^ escent zinc sulfide seemed to indicate that,- 1, The intensity of phosphorescence diminished with an increase in purity, S. 3mall traces of impurities such as magnesium and man- ganese greatly increased the intensity of the phosphorescence. 3. The addition of some sodium chloride had a beneficial effect. 4. Certain metals such as iron, cobalt and chromium were detrimental to the production of phosphorescent compounds. in a paper published in 1917 by Maci)ougall, v/right and Stewart some of the above factors were verified and the quant- ities of impurities necessary were determined. Phosphorescence can be elicited by either magnesium ribbon, sunlight, cathode rays, x-rays, mercury arc or an electric globe. • / r I I > » ! ,.Tr w W - >> _ '. M'^.-Ar-ji* . ■. ’ V.' I’ ;•.'■« It- |^r i f i ■1 » t i I I ki > ‘ f i -4- i I . £;XFEK iMEfv' ji4L . The following methods of preparing phosphorescent zinc sulfide were investigated, - 1. Thermite Method. 2. iiacDougall, Wright and Etewart Method. 3. Hof mann and lihicca Method. 4. Modification Method. 1. TES:miTE MSTiiOH. If a quantity of zinc dust and amorphous sulfur are mixed in molecular proportions, that is 65 parts of zinc to 3E parts of sulfur by weight, and then heated, a very violent reaction takes place and zinc sulfide is produced. If a small amount of a metallic impurity is added to the mixture and the operation repeated v/e have all the conditions necessary for the production of a phosphorescent compound. Hov;ever, this method proved unsucessful because a uniform product could not be obtained. Eome of the sulfide glowed more intensely th^in the rest. 2. MACHOTJGAIL, .>KIEHT aHJJ ETB.vAHT l^THOD. Zinc chloride sticks were dissolved in water and the solution was made alkaline, a considerable quantity of ferric hydroxide precipitated so that the solution was allowed to stand for 2 days in order to insure the complete removal of iron because of its poisonous effect on the phosphorescence. I . ' . ** • ! i - * *V -w' . t >t . 4 »-: : . ' . ’'i .‘^ V; rt'i. - i,' V • v'* ■ V L ■'/ t!»^V ■ • ■ *• ' '!• .• '‘‘.'w' .. ■ ^•i •J .' 'n^, ■ f>>, ■ V. '•/t -t .t'.,-,»i iiU I • .' X'O’X' V kl:..//'! ' ; . •;<: ~ ”*. ' pj' I o.'j i* l’. G 0", Mu ' , . , “Vi. . , C '... ' V . . f>f: ' . >.) ^ ' V '' .• / M.'. ^o; .■ : 0 .* . I'li . I r» vijni 1 r ; t' ' -.1 • 4 ^ 4 l ■ ... MU 1 11 ^W t n l A il / ! fc 1 , j f- ~ If ■! -5- i‘he solution was then filtered, diluted to molal, and 15 grams of sodium chloride were added per liter. 15 cc. of a thousandth grsjn molecular solution of copper chloride was added to 100 cc. of the zinc chloride and the zinc sulfide was then precipitated with hydrogen sulfide. ‘i‘he precipitate was filtered, dried at about 100° and ground in a porcelain mortar. The ease with ?/hich the samples are contaminated cannot be overemphasized, .absorption of gases from the air, dust, or contact with metallic objects have a very deleterious effect. later, it was found more practical to use about 500cc. of zinc chloride at a time instead of lOOce. because comparative results were not obtainable from different batches of stock solution. One reason for this difference was the difficulty in precipitating exactly the same amount of sulfide each time. The best results were obtainable when about one-half of the entire amount of sulfide was precipitated. If all of the sul- fide was brought down the results were much inferior. Since hydrogen sulfide was used for the precipitation, it was not possible to bring down exactly one-half of the zinc each time. Ammonium sulfide was tried but it gave inferior results. The degree of phosphorescence was improved by sieving the zinc sulfide thru silk, because of the danger and ease of contamination, a metal sieve was not used. instead, the piece of silk was placed between the wide ends of two large funnels. on ^ A ;. : *V • ; ; : . t v r. ;:. . •■ :\ 4 ’■ . , ' . • ■ ;-v »- ’ . 1 ^ ^ V ^ . r .' I i'vn r»[: i - . , .yr. } ' :' %,• ti) V ij <'> (.'' i i . * * V 'i •X .< I c -t.i.v: ; r-,' •; . -y - ■ ■ ■ .' -’v • ■■''' ' ;■ * '.V .., .'■ ., of. .• ■ ; , i ^dl •r ;- *) . W > 1 : vi r.. ; 5 . j •*>,' VO- _ The latter were then clanged together. il’or heating the samples, a four inch muffle furnace was found to be the most practical, it was modified by plac- ing a well fitting clay plate as a false bottom, ^ust above the gas jet, in order to keep the flames from the crucibles as that would cause uneven heating, hy means of this arrange- ment about six crucibles could be heated at the same time if necessary. The samples were heated at various temperatures in order to determine the affect of time and heat on phosphores- cence. A pyrometer was used for the temperature measurements. To determine v/hen the maxiniara phosphorescence was reach- ed, samples were taken out every two minutes with a porcelain spatula and tested immediately under sunlight, magnesium ribbon or electric globe. A small bottomless cylinder with an obser- vation aperture on the top was found very useful for daylight testing. By means of this device the latter could be performed in the vicinity of the furnace as it performed the function of a dark room. Porcelain crucibles were found to be the best although not entirely satisfactory. They were fouifi to be attached by the fumes evolved during the heating so that they could only be used once. Metal orjicibles contaminated the product very easily. The crucibles were kept loosely covered to prevent eny contamination from the air and to allow the fumes to escape slowly. It was found that phosphorescent zinc sulfide is much • *■ I* ■ , ■ *>>■*' I •• , r t • ^' V » \ / ' • :;i . . r Ir . > .•y -Jn r -I . 1 . V f t V.. r • *, M Bt.*' 7 i: ; O’ C J' ( / ‘ J ^ 'TJ *j .'' •-. I s » I T* f r), ■' ( •’ ?»■ ’’ ,r, ( ” r' .* i”' -.■r- '' I \ - 8 - and manganese precipitated "before the ainc sulfide upon pass- ing hydrogen sulfide into the solution so that the quantity of impurity was not proportional to the amount of zinc sulfide precipitated, consequently, duplication of results could only be accomplished with the greatest difficulty. 2. fhe amount of sodium chloride contained in the samples depended upon the amount of liquid adsorbed by the percipita-te during filtration and consequently was a variable quantity. 3. i'he zinc chloride contained other impurities such as cadmium and lead which were not removed by this method. 3. HOFMiVM AFD BUCCA TfflTHOB. In this process, the zinc sulfide was precipitated from zinc ammonium sulfate as the latter can be prepared in a very pure state by recrystallization in water 20 grams of zinc ammonium sulfate, 5 grams of sodium chloride and .4 gram of magnesirm chloride were dissolved in 460 cc. of distilled water which had been slightly acidified with sulfuric acid. lOOcc. of ammonium hydroxide were then add- ed, the solution was stirred thoroughly, and allov/ed to stand for 24 hours. The precipitation, drying and heating were then carried out as described in the above method. GP.TTICISM OF HOFMm: AIID DFCCA MFtHOB. 1. The amount of sodium chloride varied as in the Mac- Dougall Method. 2. Its use was limited to magnesium and manganese. " %W' ■ .1C;rt# rM'll''’’- n t/h ^,u< ‘♦*{';>.'^4 i '■• ' '>J i;,»;f'0i>Ur, iVWfi*;.;' CV>t .S* I'- O.Ve.»^!.vBJ «(•'•" ^'r ‘ ‘' 'fiU.Vlrf.^ ■■ . v^j i'^,.f,«tt« . V ;c‘iiv';f^ -.^ r ' -s^y . . . '. _■ . J '•■ \\ •, ^ " &-;v ; . c - !kc r f. j: ? v -.^ri i :\X^- %* 1 1 / .‘.A c ^ * '\r - ' ^1 ii I i tioJto ’ ^ iMM.I '\.;’) ,'j>' ^ 4>f - ■ ■ • ■ » t ■ • ;i/ t 'i'^v i \«*iVi4-',t?<'. \ t;y.X'c.'Ofi^ .ti ^ ST . .• ' . ' ’ .' ' ' 0 '.V , , ^ ■ * *« " • ,■ In . i j;Vi^^'.- ,vY- . ■?> 0 I i ' • ■ , t ^ ; 1^ ; * ‘’^ ’:• i ..,0/ ii i’ s v;'x M>W - 'J ■ Pi|2 *-r !• i?^rcf{^ :^‘.a i,£spi.m^ ^ * V,t . ;i . J ajO a t'l ,t,._4 c ., .>» 0-^ vf „ ; f d"- 4 3 " r icnici a ,■.',•"** h > . ■ >-■ ; CAfif^" S^ t ^ X|J’, ^ ' I i:'r frrv* 0 -, Xt x*iyr '’-»jf‘f‘"''.:(f\>i ifu >• titl •>^?34\C4^S:*: ^ k.^4}^-\Uu . r 0*i V;' ^ .00 '. '*"■ . *'• • , “ < ^ ’■ '-iA ’/V b- n^.iJ ". ."i; yi < . ti»i*(^/ . tii'iScv ie’ jjBKjp.' ^r ••-^v' , . r ' . •■ . 'I* MVyyA 4. i.'iODT^’ICATIOlT lifSl'HOjJ. I’his method might be considered as a combination of the good points in the above two methods and those in Lenard and Xlatt's method for the production of phosphorescent sulfides of the alkali earths. Zinc sulfate was used as a raw material instead of the chloride because the chlorine affects the phosphorescence and the amount of it was regulated in the last stages of this procedure in order to be able to duplicate results. 50 grams of zinc sulfate were dissolved in about 450 cc. of water, the solution was heated and then acidified with 5 cc. of nitric acid, androgen sulfide was then passed in and the solution f il tered, thus eliminating any cadmium or lead that might be present. ‘rhe hydrogen sulfide was prepared by passing electrolytic hydrogen thru boiling sulfur. I’he electrolyte was a lO/o sodium hydroxide solution and the electrodes of nickel gauze. The sulfur was purified with carbon disulfide. The product formed was very pure but the yield was small because of the ease with which hydrogen sulfide decomposes at high temperatures. Later, this method was discontiniied because the samples were not suf- ficiently improved to v/arrant its substitution for the mu.ch more simple and efficient method of using pyrites and sulfuric acid in a kipp generator, in the latter method a purification train was employed which consisted of two units containing cotton, one of sulfuric acid and one of distilled water. -ntAvOA,. P’ «OI| • 7 >*- ,/ ' w -'V' *' V)V k\ t XV- .'Vt?Jf TCt^, * ^ ' T .fl •’ A . j ». :* ■ * :•? • I’U' :« 'f f.j- . ’ i.-?^ itl a^^0ilv ' I ^ ' ' ^ |H^ ’ «■'-' ♦• -v' ■ *^-*' * * n> »■ \.':ii,ti‘'*n OE'jt**' t^V*? * ‘THi^T^’ * . , • I , .^^1 , 1 ^ ^ • TiW lii'M 1 ' ■* ’fU» Yo* 2 i>; vc. ^,'^J (Ktq’ % • '■ .• ' ■ ' ■ 4 ’'■' ’* • <' 1 ? .^•t^ vj .i ’i ' i;tf'r.A; vijit.'? *o«^'--. 3 r, 9 ■•►’ •• ‘X. ■ V* V n.:n^tffi f,'^' ^'^Oi Si^ * # S^ C V Ji f 1 Ji.rl- 0^1 (f ;tci 8 ,;u • ^ ' 4- sr- r^/d-v-T^rffjy*' J ,:'■* .• «iJfctl!|jtf/f ^1 • 1 ,Oi-'. •;'v.V .y ' ^ < u ' 1^ /'•■'' 3, , 4 J ' ■-('*■ '' ' -_ ‘ : ,j 6 Wfv>n^ fty* '>tcfea.- . /; ■a^ ..^ ' .^r4tr. 4»f^. •:Hi3. “T, '^-i. " ' ■"■ ‘'''V'^ , iMSfe'"' ' 1:^ V ' -TO- The filtrate from the hj'drogen snlfide treatment was treated with lOcc. of concentrated nitric acid and boiled for ten minutes, 20c c. of ammonium hydroxide were then added and the solution filtered, -mmonium hydroxide was then added in excess until the precipitate which first formed redissolved. The solution was allowed to stand for 48 hours and the ferric hydroxide then removed by filtration. Hydrogen sulfide was then passed into the warmed filtrate to saturation. The filter- ed zinc sulfide was washed very thoroughly, this being the only method in which that operation can be performed , j?‘inally, it was crushed and sieved thru silk. The impurities were introduced by placing lo cc. of dry alcohol in a porcelain mortar. The active metals, such as copper and manganese , were dissolved in water and the solution diluted so that 1 cc. contained .001 gram of metal. By means of a capillary tube the required pjnount of impurities was add- ed to the alcohol. The flux, Bad, was then added in the dry form and finally the zinc sulfide was introduced. The constit- uents were thoroughly mixed by grinding until the alcohol had entirely evaporated giving a dry product. The heating was carried out by placing the porcelain crucible containing the sulfide in a larger clay crucible and putting a few crystals of sulfur between the two in order to have a red'cing atmosphere. Both crucibles were covered secure- ly thus preventing any oxidation of the sulfide. r iwwirifcpitf|TiWi VK -J'T' KJ '. »{> “■“S^r ■’■f f-'-* ' • 'I/" , ;t'^, , ,A'>.v.^ ■■'’ Jia. ,i.y jtJ'J'l'f -,j*', .^5iiC£ '4<. ’4. ' '■. “ '.' '■ j'j , - ! '•ii>6t/’= *ciqCrJ uft^^ ‘)fpa *y'ifiM? i,»r ■ r V. , . ^ .J -■ ,;(„ ^ vt-i-r ..*^ « :i-t vf ,l. -V .-?»’*• 'V, Kjl] ^ ^-*^' 1 ,. ” ^ \ V; j /'" y“ f ' ■^' ' ' f ■ '~' .■* *'i“^ -. ^ A < 'i'-t ; f t- ■;; ■rr ..,iu:-Y V , • *:n/ivv I .’; ■;lo'ic'^ ^ ’ ,i| f •» '■ * • * • ,• • y . ''•> -^v . ’ ■ jJis S I>,Jp ■’^v. "'"P ♦• 4‘ r'* i^l • >:> ..4* c.r \'^ S,.:, j&d^ ji ',.ii • r ^ ▼ _ ,y I «i -I ! . , - ' ‘A r • ’S®' r;, /*, . i,<'0. 'c4 • .* ' ,, ; . ^. .'• •. 'J I . I- :.“\*v . ■ - ^ '- ■ - ''. • . , ' - •“ .n^ . .t._ lb > ji.mn- ^ ■ 1 .i^ ¥ ^ •■’»^: 1 o-tB -Jt-.' .'>x # • f>h ''ai\: S'»W . ki4 4 '■, .'t^?r .kuV .ri.T4’,v»i -Wlf ' |i ^ . -tin 'kij ’ ' ' • 'T' ‘ * -■ ' s -*’ [iK I v‘ t o’'T.i'*' V’-"' , '¥^ . , ' ^ ■ v'^ < ■•■ t' ' I K> Hl>- ? 1 .■ J ?/i.'n'’v* ?fr ''uJL /• ", C 1, .» 0'*^. *• ■' iT ‘ ' ' ' ■%■' ■' ' ' '‘"C '/' ^'■'' , -.-ytftti), -,f/ ’’ ‘ •' .*' '.’•fe', (' ' !•''-* ' ^ o-,^^ t ■ iw;i b'''-/,., ' • «‘^ ■ . Ji^ '' ' ‘ . iM * ‘‘ '.i«3 s’* > 4i 1 ' 12 - .'''^ 6^ iL- ■>•■ ■ ■ St) * ► ''^ i ■ ’! iy. kkA. - 11 - For a phosphorescent sample containing copper, the follow- ing proportions were found to he the best,- 4 grams zinc sulfide, .5 gram sodium chloride, .0004 gram copper. For a phosphorescent sample containing mnganese, the following proportions were used,- 4 grams zinc sulfide, .5 gram sodium chloride, .008 grcm manganese. Uranium, molybdenum and vanadium were also tried but the results were inferior to those obtained from copper and man- ganese. 1 i/o. 14..’ 4 p[j:r.^,>'j?T^cc, ^*r 5 V» 4 » « ^ .1^^: I* ■urif^ KOO. t> !?t*n •■- *',. ‘<>J gjo <4? aaoi;i7flr,,o-:r ^ ■t 3 •' 7 : 'V 1 ! » iw f !i'mu%. <»«’i 1^ ta i iS i t , ^ s \ V ■■ >., .%.J -ta-.T 6 T / . 0 - - 10 . n', :r >.. ' I V V Eie 0 , T« ( iV-Mfll *.k; ^ AgJ30^T ^ -JyjimT ; \ ''.VV . . ' ■ •■ ; ■' ■'1 li * t ' 0 ' . * '«■ 00^ i' 4 ;.'» 4 i) o^ tol’joiAi £' ’ . ' •, '' M -Id- CCITCIFSIOITS. The Modification Method was found to be best because it removed all of the impurities in the raw material and also gave restilts which could be duplicated at any time. A large q uantity of pure zinc sulfide could be prepa,red as a stock supply, which facilitated the rate at which samples could be prepared. The necessary constituents were found to be the pure sulfide, an active metal and a medium or flux thru which the tv/o were brought into intimate contact. Upon heating a sample of zinc sulfide, a considerable quantity of chlorides are driven off as fumes. If the sample was heated longer than the time required for the production of phosphorescence, it was found that the zinc sulfide was almost entirely crystalline. This indicated that all of the necessary impurities had been evolved as chlorides because the latter prevent the crystalline formation due to their high vapor pressure. THSCHY. The mechanism thru which phosphorescence is produced seems to be a chemical union of the active metal with the sul- fide causing a very complex, unstable molecular formation. One molecule of Copper, for example, unites with a great number of zinc sulfide molecules. On the application of pressure as in grinding, the phosphorescence diminishes. due to a dis- turbance of the unstable complexity. The excitation by means . '.I- > y ' « '!? ' 1 ; ii. r :' -^}l •^(i " ' ra ® T'-\ ‘T , . : ■ -:’'-v ' ' ' ■ '■ "-■1^ i i # t tJ'l''-'Outi *'^ i -j'? >J li tiiifi-V. r. 'ft «* iixi’j' .' , o3,W ^ j“ • ‘ - , -p jiV f- • ■■ V ' ■ :^',.’!i. .v:V • ■'•v'i> I .f! • .y .. ^t3ui{0‘,r *;f> {jtjjifti idt^ j* ■ i’' v> ’..^ V ■■; '’S^' ■' ' /, ^ 'n* •'W*’ »'4, i 'iSSc,;' a*. * fMfJ'J' pN r»:i^ . *'" ■. J'J J|;f V t tl *•’ f.'s'', ■ ^ ’ ■ ' - ^f o^vpr- ''vV c/ ii;..7.' i ■ fi*} /r 'cr'’^. >hf 4 J • ' 1 ' vj. 'jf^ _ ^ .,*• ■ •- " -?■ '\Y( • ..A « Vf Vtp i rSWT^ r ■ te|i> • -»*• iy f^' *!f .- - ;i* : . tHv ^..4t s^v.iJ a*W ‘'‘-■■■iii L'A -■ . . , , -.1 ■ .,, •>. y4. bfwpir v?i ^ ^. ; O.’dvl^ ,t« ^tr.4)r i ■ 2..V' - ffilt :' R. <'m 9 /s I' ii-j („t.rt' ;(■ tu'j j; / ^vJoTti'4i)W fi-;l yitiio»-»otiW';.fet y 'J'T lic/w- ' 3 * i>.(U t ^ V>i •'& '< ''''8 ■ ' - -■ " n « .y I/. ?4 T ■♦, '.•s» ■' . - ■■',>, « , . .' . ■ -j .,^s-^ 'y ,1 ■ >. 1^ ■ ^ Si. ' 'id^'^:' I ' ‘1 . ' i- t _ ,'&, V"’ Ai4? iVJ. '4 V-^ ■ ’ ■' f ‘ t' ‘ ■ fX^SJ^lr -M * i\lt,\>l% f-a rfexr,?i *’ ,,'- ? •' "■ '. ^ '^■. ; * ^ V oji^dtlMciTTl^cx^n ■ ” "“ ' if', ' • ■ ■-• _ ' ? ■ «• * I'^i y ^%pT:':ipi‘^at /^ j.u “ ■ ’ ■ ' : 3^' .r^*^ .1^ pa f-V' •; ' ' I ^ < jr ";T o. i'> f-i./sav ' ‘I. >< .- ^ ■*■ ' ■ •- « • .. Vl ''■ • - .N j y --U Ts;i(i>-i,'^'. tWXiLXr vi4 ' ''' ^ -15- BIBIIOGRIPEY. 1. — — Phil. Trans. ^ (257-344) 1768 2 . Gothes Parhen. ( 3£3 ) 3. Compt. rend. 103 ( 188 ) 1886 4 . ibid 106 (1104 ) 1888 5 . ibid 1^ 1899 6 Berichte ^ (3076 ) 1904 7. ibid 37 (3407 ) 1904 Handbnch der Spectroscopie H. Kayser. Phosphorescent Zinc Sulfide R. Tomeschek. Ann. Physikj^ ( '189 ) 1921 Phosphorescent Zinc Sulfide MacBougall,etc. Jour. Chem. Soc. Ill (663) 1917 Phosphorescenz lenard and Zlatt. Ann. Physik (1899-1915)