The Spirit Of Black Partridge SeeKiivg Old Fort Dearborn Take this home with the compliments of Mayor William Hale Thompson as a souvenir of a pleasant day spent as his guest at RiverviewPaik U I~3: BBWMMNMIB1 LAWRENCE J. GUTTER Collection of Chicogoono THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO The University Library Old and The JVezu Jhe old Illinois Central passenger station at lake Street in 1665, showing how the tracks- were first built~ on a. trestle work out in the ae. 7he proposed new Illinois Central passenger depot to be, constructed at 1%*!? Street and South Par\ Arenue vhich has been built up from the beef of laJtg'Michiqar^. ' Landmarks of Chicago One hundred years ago, or within the lifetime of persons yet living, there was no Chicago, that is, there was no settled community of that name, and the place where the great city of Chicago now stands was a wilderness, save only for a lonely fort on the south bank oi the river and a few rude cabins within sight of the fort. Go back another hundred years, or two hundred years prior to the present year of nineteen hundred and twenty-two, and there was even less in the way of evidence that civilization had touched this locality. At that time travellers passing by might have noted what appeared to be the remains of an old fort on the bank of the river near the Lake, and paddling their canoes up the sputh branch they might have noted on the bank of the river a few miles back from the Lake the dilapidated remains of a lowly cabin which had been erected there perhaps forty or fifty years prior to that time. THE FIRST VISIT OF FATHER MARQUETTE On a day late in the summer of 1673, there appeared at the mouth of the river a few white men, accompanied by a number of Indians. They beached their canoes and engaged in ceremonies which unmistak- ably were those of leave-taking. The dominating figure of the party was a slender, young Frenchman in the garb of a Jesuit priest. Every act, gesture and word of his proclaimed him a man of culture and re- finement, and he was treated with the utmost deference and considera- tion by every man in the party, including the rough, hardy French voy- ageurs and the untutored savages. A closer look at this scholarly young churchman, who appeared to be not older than 35, disclosed the fact that he was in the clutches of that dread malady, tuberculosis, or con- sumption as it was then termed; and that he was none other than Father Jacques Marquette, accompanied by Louis Joliet, the famous French trader and explorer, and several French voyageurs, returning to Green Bay from the trip on which they had just explored the Mississippi river as far south as the mouth of the Arkansas. The Indians with them were of the Kaskaskia tribe of the Illinois nation, and had accom- panied the exploring party up the Illinois river from the chief village of the Kaskaskias. When the party again put their canoes into the water, the white men turned north along the shore of the Lake, while the In- dians silently and sorrowfully turned their canoes up the river toward the southwest, evidently to return to their village on the Illinois river located at about the present site of Utica. THE FIRST BUILDING ON SITE OF CHICAGO A little over one year later, early in December, 1674, several canoes approached from the north along the lake shore and the occu- pants landed on the spct where they had landed the year before. It was Father Marquette and his party on their way from Green Bay back to the village of the Kaskaskias. On account of the severity of the weather, they had been several weeks coming this far, and when they attempted to put into the little river here, they found it covered with six inches of ice. It was apparent that Father Marquette was a very sick man; too sick, in fact, to continue the journey in that bleak and cold winter. What was to be done? After a consultation among the party, it was decided to build a hut for him and to wait until he got able to travel again. Accordingly, a detachment of the party followed the course of the river inland until they came to a piece of high ground covered with trees. With their axes they made a clearing and felled enough trees to build a log cabin, and when it was finished they ten- derly conveyed the sick man to it. That was the first habitation built for a white man or by white men in the State of Illinois. It was lo- cated on the north bank of the river at a point near where Robey Street, if extended, would cross the west fork of the south branch of the Chicago river. This historic spot, at which civilization first touched in Illinois and in the Mississippi valley, is now marked by a large cross erected there by Mr. Cameron Wylie, in 1905, at the request of the Chicago Historical Society. It was six years before another white man ventured into these solitudes, when, in December, 1681, a number of canoes entered the mouth of the river, conveying a party of twenty-five Frenchmen and about as many Indians. The party was led by the Chevalier Robert de LaSalle and his faithful companion, Henri de Tonti. They were on their way to explore the Mississippi river to its mouth. They passed the lonely cabin erected for Father Marquette, crossed the divide between the Chicago river and the Desplaines river, placed their canoes in the latter river and glided down to the Illinois, on to the Mississippi, and on and on until they came to the salt water of the Gulf of Mexico, where, at the mouth of the great Father of Waters, LaSalle, on April 9, 1682, erected a cross, planted the banner of France, claimed all of the territory drained by the great river for the kingdom of France, and named it Louisiana in honor of the reigning monarch, King Louis XIV. UNNAMED FRENCH FORT BUILT HERE IN 1682-3 In about one year from the time that LaSalle and his party passed this way on their famous voyage of discovery, a couple of canoes came down the little river from the direction in which LaSalle had departed, and two of the men of his former party got out. After a brief survey of the surroundings they marked a location and erected a small fort with heavy logs which they could easily drag over the snow. When it was completed the men occupied it as though they intended to make it their permanent abiding place, but they hastened away a few months later to join their friends at Fort St. Louis on Starved Rock. This little structure, built to guard the portage from the Chicago river to the Desplaines, although in itself insignificant, was an integral part of a great scheme which LaSalle had conceived of erecting a chain of French forts to extend from the mouth of the St. Lawrence river, around the Great Lakes, down the Illinois and Mississippi rivers to the Gulf of Mexico, thus preparing to maintain a through waterway from the Gulf of St. Lawrence to the Gulf of Mexico, and to defend the claim of France to all the vast territory which these forts would guard. One of these forts, named Fort St. Louis, in honor of the King, was erected on the top of Starved Rock on the Illinois river. That was the temporary headquarters of LaSalle, and it was from that fort that he sent a detachment late in 1682 or early in 1683 to build the little fort here at the mouth of the river. HOW CHICAGO GOT ITS NAME The locality in the immediate neighborhood of the fort was low and swampy, and the most common vegetation of the vicinity was the wild onion, which, at certain seasons of the year, gave forth a rank and putrid odor. There is no definite proof that the little river or the locality were at that time considered important enough to have a name to designate them, but since our city has become world famous, the claim has been advanced that our name Chicago was derived from an Indian word meaning "a bad smell," perpetuating the memory of the wild onions. Another tradition is to the effect that the name was derived from a similar Indian word signifying a man particularly brave and strong. This theory is supported by the fact that there was a Chief of the Illinois Indians named Chicago, but it is probable that he was named after the locality. Another account of how Chicago got its name, which is more logi- cal if true, and vastly more acceptable, will be found in the Remini- scences of Early Chicago, by Edwin O. Gale, in which he quotes from a letter which the Chevalier, Robert de LaSalle, is supposed to have written back to a friend in France concerning LaSalle's explorations in this vicinity. Unfortunately, the letter referred to cannot be located, but it was quoted by Mr. Gale as follows: "After many toils I came to' the head of the great Lake and rested for some days on the bank of a river, of feeble current, now flowing into the lake, but which occupies the course that formerly the waters of these great lakes took as they flowed southward to the Mississippi river. This is the lowest point on the divide between the two great valleys of the St. Lawrence and the Mississippi. The boundless regions of the west must send their products to the east through this point. This will be the gate of empire, this the seat of commerce. Every- thing invites to action. The typical man who will grow up here must be an enterprising man. Each day as he rises he will exclaim, '1 act, I move I push,' and there will be spread before him a boundless horizon and illimitable field of activity. A limitless expanse of plain is here to the east water and at all other points land. If I were to give this place a name, 1 would derive it from the nature of the place and the nature of the man who will occupy this place; ago, I act; circum, all round Circago." . . Those who maintain that LaSalle thus gave us our name explain that the Indians who heard it from his lips, not being able to pronounce it in its original Latin form, rendered it as it might nearest sound in their own language, She-cau-go, and that it was finally settled into its present form, Chicago. So far as the writer has been able to ascer- tain there was no mention of Che-cau-gau, under that or any similar name, prior to the first visit of LaSalle to this vicinity. Its first men- tion occured in Father Hennepin's account of LaSalle's expedition to the Illinois river in 1680. This fact lends color to the theory that the Indians had adopted LaSalle's name for the locality; and this theory is further strengthened by the fact that those versed in Indian lore and language cannot agree as to the Indian origin of the name nor as to its meaning. WARRING INDIAN NATIONS DELAY WHITE SETTLEMENT The building of the little hut for Father Marquette and the erection of the unpretentious fort near the mouth of the Chicago river con- stituted the only improvements or additions to the landscape made by the early French explorers, and in the course of the years following these fell into rapid decay through disuse. Another hundred years were to pass before any attempt would be made permanently to settle the plain around the mouth of the Chicago river. Although all the trails of discovery and exploration were from the north, yet permanent ettlements were made in southern Illinois a full century before they were here. This was a result of feuds and conflicts between the differ- ent Indian tribes and nations. The valley of the Illinois river was inhabited by tribes of the Illinois Indians when it was first visited by Marquette and Joliet. In fact, it was this circumstance which gave the river its name. Away to the east, there dwelt a savage, war-like aggregation of Indians called the Iroquois. They were unrelenting foes of the Illinois, and would swoop down on the latter from time to time, until the Illinois were threatened -with extinction. And so it was that the early French explorers were welcomed to the Illinois country because the Indians here saw in them powerful protectors against the dreaded raids of the Iroquois; and it was to protect the friendly Illinois that LaSalle erected Fort Crevecoeur, near the present site of Peoria, in 1679, and Fort St. Louis on Starved Rock late in the year 1682. These unsuccessful attempts to establish settlements on the northern Illinois river were abandoned about 1 700, and the settlements moved to southern Illinois, the first of which was established at Kaskaskia, which later became the first capital of Illinois. CAHOKIA COURTHOUSE, 200 YEARS OLD, NOW IN JACKSON PARK Cahokia was the second permanent French settlement established in Illinois, and was named for the Cahokia Indians, a tribe of the Illinois nation which dwelt in that vicinity. It was at Cahokia, in 1716, that the first public building -was erected. It was used as a courthouse, a schoolhouse, and for other public purposes. It was brought to Chi- cago, in November, 1906, and erected on its present location by the Chicago Historical Society, where it may be seen now on the Wooded Island in Jackson Park, just as it stood in old Cahokia two hundred years ago. With the abandonment of Fort St. Louis on Starved Rock in I 722 the Chicago portage was abandoned, and thereafter for about a hundred years commerce between the Great Lakes and the Mississippi river valley was by way of the Maumee River to the present site of Fort Wayne, Indiana, thence overland to the present site of LaFayette, Indiana, thence down the Wabash into the Ohio and on to the Mississippi. "FIRST 'WHITE* SETTLER IN CHICAGO WAS A NEGRO" After the removal of the French to southern Illinois about 1700, nothing worthy of note seems to have happened at the Chicago river until July 4, 1779, on which date the British commander at Mackinac recorded the fact that "Baptiste Point de Saible, a handsome negro, well educated, settled at Eschikagou, and is much in the French inter- est." De Saible was a native of Santo Domingo. His name being un- doubtedly of French origin, considered in connection with the meager details of his biography, suggests that his father was a French trader and adventurer and his mother a native negress of Santo Domingo. His cabin was on the north bank of the Chicago river near the north end of the present Michigan Avenue bridge. In 1 796, De Saible sold his cabin to a French trader, Pierre Le Mai (one of four who settled here temporarily at the time), and returned to Peoria, where he died soon after. Thus it happened, as has been humorously stated, that "the first white settler in Chicago was a negro." THIS LOCALITY DESIGNATED SITE FOR FORT When the government of the United States, under the Constitution, was established in 1 789, steps were taken immediately to establish civil government in the territory northwest of the Ohio River. As might be expected, trouble developed between the new settlers and the Indians who occupied this territory. A military expedition led by General An- thony Wayne of revolutionary fame awed the Indians into apparent submission. In August, 1795, at Greenville, Ohio, a treaty was made between General Wayne and certain Indian chiefs who were supposed to represent and speak for all the Indians in the territory northwest of the Ohio River. This original treaty of Greenville is now in the pos- session of the Chicago Historical Society. Under it the United States acquired title to several pieces and parcels of land in different parts of the territory to be used for the purpose of establishing military posts. One of these pieces was described as follows: "One piece of land six miles square at the mouth of the Chicago River, emptying into the southwest end of Lake Michigan where a fort formerly stood." (This reference is to the Fort erected in 1683 by two men of LaSalle's party sent from Fort St. Louis.) FORT DEARBORN ERECTED IN 1803-4 In accordance with the provisions of the Treaty of Greenville, a fort was erected in 1803-4 near the mouth of the Chicago River by a company of United States soldiers under command of Captain John Whistler, and was named Fort Dearborn in honor of General Henry Dearborn, a soldier of the Revolutionary War, then Secretary of War in the cabinet of President Thomas Jefferson. At the time Fort Dear- born was erected there was but one building in this vicinity, and that was the old cabin of Jean Baptiste Point de Saible, occupied at that time by the French trader, Pierre Le Mai, and his Indian wife. With the erection of the fort, and the assurance of protection which it seemed to guarantee, came the vanguard of the immigrants, who, in another generation were to settle the Chicago portage. In 1 804, the year in which the fort was completed, appeared the first permanent white settler, John Kinzie, with his family. Kinzie bought the cabin of Pierre Le Mai which had been originally occupied by Jean Baptiste Pointe de Saible. Soon after their arrival the Kinzie fireside was aug- mented by the addition of a daughter, Ellen Marion Kinzie, the first white child born on the site of our city. At the time the fort was built there was nothing to attract settlers except the opportunity the place afforded for trade with the Indians. This is indicated by the fact that an Indian trading post was erected outside the palisades of the fort and some distance west of it, at about the present intersection of Clark and Lake Streets. This trading post was purposely removed from the fort because it was not thought wise to allow the Indians inside the fortification. INDIANS ENLISTED IN WAR ON COLONISTS As we have seen, the Indians were on very friendly terms with the French, and generally fought on the side of the French in any alter- cations between the French and the English. The Indians also resented the introduction of agriculture by the English colonists because it threat- ened destruction of their vast huating grounds. After the French had been driven out, about 1 760, the British took advantage of the hostile attitude of the Indians toward the colonists in order to array the Indians against them. In pursuance of this policy, the British government for- bade the colonists from settling around the Great Lakes or in the Mississippi valley, thinking in this way to gain the friendship c' the Indians and to make an alliance with them against the colonists. During the Revolutionary War, British commanders sought to per- petuate the strife between the white settlers and the natives by em- ploying the Indians to raid the white settlements, paying them bounties for the scalps of white settlers; and the hatred thus engendered among the Indians by the mother country c. inst her own children naturally outlasted the Revolutionary War; in fact, the resentment thus created lasted as long as the Indian race. BRITISH RUTHLESSNESS CONDEMNED BY PRESIDENT MADISON The American people were compelled to engage in another war against Great Britain in 1812, in order to prevent England from des- troying our commerce on the high seas. One of the war measures adopted by Great Britain was to instigate the Indians to organize raids against the settlements- of the colonists. President James Madison, in his fourth annual message to Congress, referred to this practice of Great Britain in these words: "Whilst the beneficent policy of the United States invariably recom- mended peace and promoted civilization among that wretched portion of the human race (Indian), and was making exertions to dissuade them from taking either side in the war, the enemy has not scrupled to call to 1 his aid their ruthless ferocity, armed with the horrors of those instruments of carnage and torture which are known to spare neither age nor sex. In this outrage against the laws of honorable war and against the feelings sacred to humanity, the British commanders can- not resort to a plea of retaliation, for it is committed in the face of our example. They cannot mitigate it by calling it a self defense against men in arms for it embraces the most shocking butcheries of defenseless families." On account of its remoteness the English were able to capture Fort Mackinac on Mackinac Island in the straits between Lake Michigan and Lake Huron, and from this point they directed the Indian hos- tilities on this western frontier, including the lonely little outpost at Fort Dearborn. THE FORT DEARBORN MASSACRE IN 1812 In the summer of 1812 Fort Dearborn contained a garrison of fifty-eight officers and soldiers. Some of these men had their families with them, numbering altogether twelve women and twenty children. Aside from the fort and the Indian trading post, there were only five buildings in this vicinity, one being the home of John Kinzie, just across the river from the fort. The four other cabins were occupied by white settlers, named Lee, White, Burns and Ouilmette (pronounced Will-met), for whom the city of Wilmette was named. Thus in early August, 1812, this little aggregation of pioneers found themselves on the far western frontier of America, surrounded by hundreds of hostile Indian warriors, whose savage inclinations were being encouraged by British officers, and who were only waiting the opportunity and the word to attack. Under these circumstances, the commandant of the fort, Captain Nathan Heald, received an order from General Hull, stationed at Detroit, in supreme command of all the American forces in Michigan, Indiana and Illinois, "to evacuate the fort at Chicago if practicable, and in that event to distribute all the United States property in the fort, or factory, to the Indians in the neighborhood and repair to Fort Wayne." Captain Heald insisted upon obeying these orders, although the judgment of the other officers was against the move, regarding it as foolish to trust the little garrison to the mercy of the restless, vindic- tive savages. While the question was being debated, Captain William Wells, an uncle of Mrs. Heald, arrived from Fort Wayne, with a band 6 of friendly Miami Indians, to urge Captain Heald to hold Fort Dear- born until re-enforcements could be secured. Contrary to all this advice and counsel, Captain Heald determined to follow the instructions from General Hull, and accordingly called a council of the Indians then in the neighborhood of the fort and offered to evacuate the fort and distribute the stores among them if they would furnish a safe escort for the garrison to Fort Wayne. This they promised to do. HEROIC POSITION TAKEN BY BLACK PARTRIDGE Among the stores was a large quantity of ammunition and many barrels of whisky, the principal articles of trade with the Indians. The junior officers of the fort, realizing what a bad combination fire arms and "firewater" would make with the Indians, prevailed upon Captain Heald not to do this, so the ammunition was thrown into an old well and the whisky into the river. This made the Indians furious, notice of which was brought to Captain Heald by Black Partridge, a Potta- wattomie chief who was present at the signing of the treaty of Green- ville with General ("Mad") Anthony Wayne. Black Partridge had afterward received a medal from the United States government on account of his friendly attitude at that time. He now stated to Cap- tain Heald: "Father, I come to deliver up to you the medal I wear. It was given me by the Americans and I have worn it in token of our mutual friendship. But our young men are resolved to imbrue their hands in the blood of the whites. I cannot restrain them and will not wear a token of peace while I am obliged to act as an enemy." In spite of this solemn warning, on the morning of August 1 5, Captain Heald marched his little garrison out of the fort in martial array, accompanied by Captain Wells and his band of friendly Indians, and started south along the shore of the lake on the way to Fort Wayne. They had travelled but about a mile and a half when they were attacked by the Indians. In a few minutes, more than half of the troops were killed and the remainder surrendered. Then the Indians wreaked their vengeance on the helpless women and children, one young "brave" murdering twelve of the children. Mrs. Helm, daughter of John Kinzie and wife of Lieutenant Helm, was attacked by another "brave," but she was rescued by the timely interference and aid of Black Partridge, who exposed himself to the wrath of the infuriated warriors in order to save her. Among those killed was Captain Wells, who fought vali- antly until he was stabbed in the back by an Indian warrior. Wells street in our city was named for him. Those who were not killed were distributed among the different tribes as hostages and were later rescued. This brutal massacre is supposed to have occurred at a point about where I 8th street, if extended eastward, would cross the Illinois Central Railway. Near this point, at the foot of 18th street, is a landmark of Chicago in the form of a beautiful bronze monument representing Black Partridge saving the life of Mrs. Helm. SITE OF OLD FORT DEARBORN If the reader will now turn to the picture on the front cover of this little booklet he will note a tall building at each end of the bridge in the middle distance. The bridge is the Michigan Avenue bridge and is the link between the north side and the south side boulevard systems. The tall building to be erected at the left or the south end of the bridge will stand on the site of old Fort Dearborn. The building at the right or the north end of the bridge is about on the location of the old home occupied in turn by De Saible, Le Mai and John Kinzie. The story of old Fort Dearborn was brielly told on the memorial tablet in the building which until recently occupied the site and which read as follows: "This building occupies the site of old Fort Dearborn, which ex- tended a little across Mich. Ave., and somewhat into the river as it now is. The fort was built in 1803 and 4, forming our utmost defense. By order of Gen. Hull it was evacuated Aug. 15, 1812, after its stores and provisions had been distributed among the Indians. Very soon after the Indians attacked and massacred about fifty o'f the troops and a number of citizens, including women and children and next day burned the fort. In 1816 it was rebuilt, but after the Black Hawk War it went into gradual disuse, and in May 1837 was abandoned by the army, but was. occupied by various government officers till 1857, when it was torn down, excepting a single building, which stood upon this site till the great fire of Oct. 9, 1871. At the suggestion of the Chicago Historical So'ciety this' tablet was erected by W. M. Hoyt, Nov., 1880." It is assumed that the old tablet or some other suitable marker will be conspicuously displayed in the new building to be erected on the site and thus preserve one of the early landmarks of Chicago. The Fort Dearborn massacre in 1812 first invited national attention to this locality. Its importance as a future commercial center had been recognized by the French beginning with Marquette and Joliet; but on account of .the almost continuous, destructive conflicts involving it, first among the Indians, then between the French and English, then between the English and the American colonists, and lastly between the first settlers and the Indians, there had been no time when the location ap- pealed to sober-minded settlers as a place to establish a permanent home or to engage in peaceful commerce. HOW CHICAGO WAS LOCATED IN ILLINOIS Prior to the admission of Illinois as a state, it was not known, and few seemed to care, whether the territory in which Chicago is situated would be a part of Wisconsin or Illinois, but the surveys up to that time indicated it as properly a part of Wisconsin, the northern bound- ary of Illinois being a line drawn from the extreme south end of Lake Michigan straight west to the Mississippi river. When Illinois was ad- mitted into the Union as a state, in 1818, our territorial Representative in Congress, Judge Nathanial Pope of Kaskaskia, had the resolution of admittance amended so that the boundary was placed at its present location. This act saved the port of Chicago and sixteen of our richest counties to the State of Illinois; and it was from one of these counties that General Grant enlisted in the Civil War. CAUSES LEADING TO DEVELOPMENT HERE A situation involving the Chicago portage was now presented which was radically different from previous circumstances and conditions. Prior to 1803 the territory west of the Mississippi was foreign territory, belonging to France; but in the same year in which the building of Fort Dearborn was begun, France ceded all of that vast territory to the United States, in that way extending our frontier from the Missis- sippi River to the .Rocky Mountains and annexing to our national do- main one of the most fertile agricultural valleys of the whole world. It became evident immediately that it would not be long before the products of that region would be seeking routes to the eastern sea- board, which was the only market available at that time. That started inquiry as to the best and most convenient water routes. Then the calamity at old Fort Dearborn called attention to the Chicago portage, and the prophetic words of Marquette, Joliet, La- Salle, Tonti, Hennepin and other of the early explorers were recalled, to the effect that this is the lowest point on the divide between the valleys of the St. Lawrence and Mississippi rivers, and that a canal could be constructed here to connect the Great Lakes and the Missis- sippi with less effort than at any other place. The immediate future need and feasibility of such a canal was made apparent by the building of the Erie Canal 350 miles through the State of New York from Lake Erie to the Hudson river to provide a waterway from the Great Lakes to the Atlantic Ocean. With that canal in course of construction (it was completed in 1825), public interest naturally was attracted to a canal project to make a waterway connection between the Great Lakes and the Mississippi river system, thus providing a through water route from the agricultural lands of the Mississippi valley to the Atlantic Ocean. EARLY WATERWAY PROJECT TO UNITE LAKE AND RIVERS Therefore, it was only natural when Illinois came into the Union, in 1818, that our first governor, Shadrach Bond, in his first message to the Illinois legislature should point out the necessity for the con- struction of a waterway to join Lake Michigan and the Illinois River. It was more necessary at that time than those of the present day can appreciate, because there were then no railroads in the State of Illinois, and all commerce worthy of the name was carried on the waterways. Governor Coles, who succeeded Governor Bond, also strongly urged immediate construction of the canal, with the result that the Legislature appointed a board of commissioners to ascertain what the project would cost, with instructions to report to the next legislature. After considering this report, the Legislature in 1825 authorized the incorporation of the "Illinois and Michigan Canal Association," patterned after the New York canal corporation, which was to com- plete the canal within ten years. Daniel P. Cook, for whom Cook County was named and who was then sole member of the lower house of Congress from Illinois, vigorously opposed the plan of allowing a private corporation to build the canal, on the ground that the rich harvest in revenue which it was destined to yield should go into the State Treasury. Cook enthusiastically predicted "that in less than thirty years it would relieve the people from payment of taxes and even leave a surplus to be applied to other work of public utilities." Not being content to stop with mere opposition to the State plan, he placed Chicago and Illinois under everlasting obligation to him by securing the enactment by the Congress of the United States of the Act of March 9, 1827, granting to the State of Illinois "for the pur- pose of aiding her in opening a canal to connect the waters of the Illinois River with those of Lake Michigan," some two hundred thou- sand acres of land to be used by the State Legislature to help pay the cost of construction. FULFILLING THE PROPHECY OF FATHER MARQUETTE In 1829 the General Assembly enacted legislation looking to the organization of a new Board of Canal Commissioners "to explore, examine, fix and determine the route of the canal," and to provide for financing the undertaking by the sale of land out of that donated by the Federal Government. Under the authority of this legislation surveyors began work immediately to lay out the canal, which was projected to extend from the level of Lake Michigan, over the low divide between the Lake and the DesPlaines river, approximately 1 00 miles in a southwesterly direction to the head of navigation in the Illinois river at about the present site of LaSalle. The canal at this end joined the Chicago river at a point within sight of the location of the cabin in which Father Marquette spent the winter of 1674-5. Thus T /Tie cf^t/i/me . . from H?c6 T?OH>, fft aout tfre present /ocafcon. it appeared in /66S. with JLae. tSficfayan. impinging an J7/mot t/\e. C/dcaq?o 7?i^>- fas 6?en maife to run up full J'o to tfie rtt-ei- to t&e. Drain exfe Canat, and on. dotvn //e Ttl- j ino(J ana ^Mississippi rivers tt> t|u? ffulf of. K