Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Alternates https://archive.org/details/affectionatepleaOOshaw AN AFFECTION ATE PLEADING FOR ENGLAND’S OPPRESSED FEMALE WORKERS: RESPECTFULLY ADDRESSEE TO MY QUEEN; (“ The king that faithfully judgeth the poor, his throne shall be established for ever.”— Prov. xxix., 14;) THE GOVERNMENT; (Governors are sent by God “ for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well.”—1 Pet. ii., 14;) THE ARISTOCRACY, THE CLERGY, AND THE CONSUMING CLASSES IN GENERAL. I say not to the Public, for the Public is an ill-favoured phantom which is made accountable for all sort of iniquity. I have often been told the Public will not be satisfied unless we do this: thus men commit all manner of enormity for fear of this phantasm—the Public. Seek to please God, and you will have the praise of all good men ; and what is better, His blessing upon all your proceedings. ** Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do you even so to them.”— Matt, vii., 12. “They that be slain with the sword are better than they that be slaiu with hunger: for these pine away, stricken through for want of the fruits of the field.”— Lam. Jer. iv., 9. “ Want is the sickness which kills most surely, and kills in the most cruel manner—slowly and hopelessly.” “ Thou slialt not kill.”— Ex. xx., 13. “ All the slaughter committed by oppressions, on any pretence whatever, is wilful, cruel murder.”—Commentary by Scott. “ Masters, give unto your servants (not the lowest price you can get your work done for but) that which is just and equal; knowing that ye also have a Master in heaven.”— Col. iv., 1. “ And I will come near to you to judgment; I will be a swift witness against those that oppress the hireling in his wages, the widow, and the fatherless, and that turn aside the stranger from his right, and fear not me, saith the Lord of Hosts.”— Mai. iii., 5. LONDON: W. CLOWES AND SONS, 14, CHARING CROSS. 1850. 3 Si'. 4 Vh i8a BRITANNIA’S THANKSGIVING DAY DREAM. •* I. fed 1? t-3 f (From Punch.) An awful Plague went through the land : it thinn’d the close-pent town, Swept the scant hamlet, crossed the stream, and clomb the breezy down ; Unseen it breathed, till poison seethed in the sweet summer air ; Before its face was terror, upon its track despair. For three sad months Britannia mourned her children night and day, For three sad months she strove in vain the pestilence to stay : Medicine, helpless, groped and guessed, and tried all arts to save, But the dead carried with them their secret to the grave. Sudden the dark hand ceased to smite : Britannia drew free breath, As passed away the shadow of the minister of Death: And upon all her children a solemn charge she laid, That high and low should bow them down, because the plague was staid. Then in the night that followed on that thanksgiving day, Britannia saw a vision, as on her bed she lay : Of a great region stretched about, a crowded careful land, Wherein men plied all labours, of head, and heart, and hand. In it a city, high o’er which a golden temple shone, Wherein the great god Mammon was sitting on a throne, While millions round about his feet, men, women, old and young, Offering their hearts in homage, with various tone and tongue. Ill matched that city’s dwellings ; low hovel, palace high ; Saloons with stately pageants, huts where wretches slunk to die ; Well-ordered streets, with tracts hard by wherein the labouring breath Inhaled the subtle poison that makes life a lingering death. There for aught save Mammon-worship there were few hearts to care, For aught but Mammon-service there were but few hands to spare ; Still the pale slaves grew paler, the task-masters more stern, Few there of wise had time to love, of ignorant to learn. Death sat at the gaunt weaver’s side, the while he plied the loom; Death turn’d the wasting grinder’s wheel, as he earn’d his bread and doom ; Death, by the wan shirtmaker, plied the fingers to the bone ; Death rocked the infant’s cradle, and with opium hushed its moan. Nor in the City only did the Spectre hold his place ; In the village and the hamlet, too, he showed his constant face : In the foul sty where sire and son, mother and maiden slept, Where the infant round its playground, the dunghill, crowed and crept. 4 At bed and board, in cup and can, in worktime and in play, In the street as in the dwelling, in the night as in the day, Sat Death in Life, a presence that none did seem to note, Until the grim Guest sudden rose and bared his arm and smote. Then was weeping in the hovel, and wailing in the hall, And over all the land was fear, stretched like a funeral pall; And even Mammon’s vot’ries paused in their absorbing prayer, And looked up from their worship, with a daunted, doubting air. And turning in their trouble unto their God and Lord, They saw Death sit on Mammon’s throne—’twas Death that they adored. His bare jaws set in scornful smile, the Sceptre from his shroud Stretched forth his fleshless arm across the pale and palsied crowd. “ Your day of thanks,” it said, “ is come, your day of thanks is o’er; Millions to-day have prayed their prayer, that never prayed before. What reck I of your thankfulness, ye fools, or of your prayer ? One plague hath passed from out your homes, how many still are there ? “ What can one day of prayer avail, if from the church ye go To your homes unswept, ungarnished, to your world of wealth and wo ? Pray as you will, my stronghold’s still in every ditch and drain; Though now my servants hide their heads, they will come forth again. “ Why shrink from Death, ye that build up his seat in every home ? How be thankful at his going, ye that ever bid him come ? What wonder he makes revel, when still ye spread his board ? Need he be chary of his plagues when still ye feed his hoard ? “ I am a giant. Would ye leam to nip me in my growth ? Bring light of Heaven and rain of Heaven to those that pine for both; Build homes for toil, where toil may live in decency and health; Let ignorance and want have tithe of knowledge and of wealth. “ Show that the bond of brotherhood that linketh man with man Will no less bind, though never forged, since first the world began; Unless that sinful selfishness, that ye so sore have rued, And strive to find in common grief the seeds of common good.” THE - OPPRESSED FEMALE WORKERS. If after having, in the providence of God, been called upon to preside over the meeting of the Female Slopworkers of the Metropolis, (such a meeting as the annals of the whole world do not furnish the like,) independent of the personal knowledge I have before had of their cruelly oppressed state, I should cease my endeavours to obtain protection for them, and after a “ gush of pity,” to quote Mr. Sidney Herbert’s Letter, leave them to “ the same dreary monotony of starvation,”—should I not be like Richard Hooper and James Morrish, referred to in the following extracts from The Times and Morning Chronicle journals ? and might not these journals hold me up to the scorn and loathing of my fellow-men ? But I trust that not the fear of man, but the love of Christ, constraineth me to exert, seeking God’s blessing, my feeble powers of remonstrance with their oppressors, and to persuade that a better course should be pursued towards them, and that the Government of the country should do their duty in affording them protection. In doing this, am I not also the friend of their oppressors ? for although the laws of England, as now administered , may not touch them, must they not all one day give an account of their iniquity, and be answerable for the life-blood of their poor sisters at the judgment-seat of Christ. And, finally, I beseech all to whom these details may come, to consider well if they have any part in causing the cruel oppression of their poor neighbours, as detailed in the following pages, and in the letters generally of the Special Correspondents of the Morning Chronicle . 6 The Times of the 2nd February, 1850, commenting upon the death of the poor girl Mary Ann Parsons, obtained as a servant from the Bideford Union Poor-house, said :— “ We will leave the two monsters concerned in the death of* this poor creature to the judgment of their country. But there are two persons who cannot be reached by the law, who appeared as witnesses to testify to various acts of brutality which they had seen perpetrated upon the girl, but who yet never moved a finger to save her, nor attempted to procure her redress. We trust the opinion of their neighbourhood will do justice on Richard Hooper , of Buckland Brewer, and James Morrish , a shoemaker, the persons in question.” From the “ Morning Chronicle” February 5, 1850. “ We cannot leave the narrative without an indignant comment on the evidence of two witnesses of this transaction. One—a man of the name of Hooper —spoke of various acts of brutality which he himself had witnessed, which ought instantly to have made him apply to the magistrates for their protection towards this unfortunate child. When he first saw her she was strong and well ; in a few weeks she was bleeding, unable to stand upright, bruised, and lacerated. According to his own statement, he had seen her mis¬ tress flog her with a hazel-rod; he had seen her master flog her with a furze stub, described as a strong stick about a foot long, furnished with eighteen stout sharp leather thongs about two feet in length—and he had not, apparently, raised his voice in common mercy for her then, nor had his heart been stirred by a man’s instinct of protection for her afterwards. His indifference, and Sermon!s code of correctional discipline, are alike shameful and disgusting; and the fact that such a being as the latter should have found his way to a public office of responsibility and power,—power over the destitute, the forlorn, the friendless, and the helpless, is a foul stain on our social system itself. The law may be unable to touch these men; but the shuddering soul of humanity loathes and casts them forth.” The cruel treatment and consequent death of the poor girl referred to above, the non-interfering witnesses of which, 7 though the law be unable to reach them, it is stated the shuddering soul of humanity loathes and casts forth, was no worse or so cruel as many of those suffering under the cruel oppression of what the Editor of the Morning Chronicle has called the Shylocks of the labour market; and surely the men, whether Noblemen, or Physicians to the Queen, or whoever they be, who encourage these Shylocks, are more guilty than the mere idle spectators of the cruel chastisement inflicted on the poor girl Mary Ann Parsons. THE FEMALE SLOPWORKERS OF THE METROPOLIS. A meeting of poor Female Slopworkers was held on Monday even¬ ing, December 3rd, in the British School Room, Shakspeare Walk, Shadwell, which had been kindly lent by the proprietor of the building. From 1,000 to 1,200 of these unfortunate creatures were present, some clad in the habiliments of respectable poverty, but by far the greater part necessarily appeared in clothing to which the word “ rags” was literally applicable in its fullest meaning. The meeting was called for seven o’clock, but the greater portion of the females had assembled soon after six, and about the same hour Lord Ashley and the Right Hon. Sidney Herbert entered the room. We regret that, on account of our having had no knowledge of the intention of these distinguished persons to attend—the meeting being a private one, convened for purposes connected with our own investi¬ gations into the condition of the labouring classes—our reporters were not present in time to hear their observations. We understand that they spoke to the following effect:— Lord Ashley said he deeply sympathised with the persons assembled, and not only he, but several of his friends, and he had done so for many years past. He had given much attention to their deplorable condition, and he had come to the conclusion that the only remedy for their distress was emigration. In the various Colonies it was found that there was a very large proportion of males over females; and it was very curious that throughout England and Wales there was the same excess of females over males. On Friday evening last, before he had heard anything about this meeting, he 8 had received a letter from an eminent lady, asking—Can nothing be done to help the poor needlewomen to emigrate ? She added, that she had lately sent out a few poor young women to Australia, and she had since received a letter from one of them, saying, that immediately on getting over she had obtained a situation at a salary of £20 a year ; and further, it appeared, that by conducting herself with becoming propriety, this young woman had been honorably married, and was now doing remarkably well. He did think that the Colonies opened a wide door for the distressed needlewomen, and he would urge them to turn their attention to the question, and they might rest assured that nothing should be wanting on his part to further their views. But as his Right Honorable friend (Mr. Sidney Herbert ) was anxious to say a few words—and they would be very few, for they had a previous engagement to meet with the lady who had sent him this letter, and a party of other friends, to see whether anything could be done to organise a plan for the emigration of the young needlewomen—they would excuse him from saying more than they had his deepest sympathies, and that every plan for their benefit should have his warmest support. Mr. Sidney Herbert then addressed a few words to the meet¬ ing. He could assure them of the deep sympathy that he had long cherished for the poor, and especially for the poor needlewomen, whose sufferings, as they had been detailed in the columns of the Morning Chronicle , he deeply felt. But he wDuld not intrude further upon their time, as he was aware that this meeting was one entirely of a practical character, and he was very anxious that they should proceed at once to detail their own sufferings and wrongs, which he was sure would tend to deepen the impression that had been created by the pathetic details of the Metropolitan Corre¬ spondent of the Morning Chronicle , who had awakened a spirit in the country which he trusted would not be laid asleep till it had issued in the amelioration of the condition of the class of needle¬ women now assembled. Lord Ashley and Mr. Sidney Herbert, who were loudly cheered in the course and at the conclusion of their remarks, then withdrew. Mr. Shaw, army clothier, was then called upon to take the chair; and on taking it he addressed the poor creatures in the following words :—My poor friends, in asking you to meet here this evening, it has not been from any mere motives of curiosity, but, I trust, on 9 the part of those who have proposed and of all taking part with us in this meeting, there exists an earnest determination, with God’s help, to seek to obtain an amelioration of your oppressed condition ; to enable us to do which, we require to obtain a faithful and true account of your actual condition, consequent upon the low payment you receive for your labour. As an humble individual, who has for some years not only mourned over the grievous, cruel oppression of so many of my poor fellow-subjects, by the starving prices paid for female labour especially, but also used my best endeavours to obtain the alleviation of it, and having in consequence made many enquiries into their condition, I have been requested to preside here. It has been with earnest prayer that God may direct me, and that he may be present with us this evening by His Holy Spirit for Christ our dear Redeemer’s sake, who, when on this earth, went about doing good; and who has given his disciples this commandment, that we love one another as he has loved us. And surely, for such a purpose as we are met together this evening, we may expect His presence amongst us; and may His blessing rest with those who have come forward on your behalf, and that of the oppressed working people throughout the country, and may they have wisdom for all their further enquiries, and for their guidance in seeking a remedy for this grievous national evil. The object of the meeting being to ascertain the earnings of the female hands engaged in the slop-trade; to hear some account of their sufferings and privations through the low prices paid for their labour; also to discover whether those low prices arise from com¬ petition among the masters, or competition among the men; before the business proceedings commenced, they were earnestly exhorted to be careful in speaking nothing but the exact truth in any state¬ ments they might make, and in any answers they might give to questions put to them. It has been stated that the meeting consisted of from 1,000 to 1,200 slopworkers. The aggregation of so considerable a number rendered it obviously impossible for their condition to be described individually ; it was therefore determined to ascertain it generally by means of questions put by one person—with parties stationed at different points in the room to ascertain the nature of the replies with precision and accuracy. The first class of questions related to the occupations of the parties 10 and their numbers. It appeared that there were present 344 shirt makers, 341 trowsers makers, 178 coat or blouse makers, 34 waist¬ coat makers, 19 makers of sou’-westers, 33 makers of waterproof coats, 23 stay makers, 24 umbrella and parasol makers, 83 makers of soldiers’ pillows and beds, and 66 shoe binders. The next series of questions had reference to their condition, or, more correctly, to the amount of their physical comforts and necessities. The first question of this class was, “ How many have under-clothing ? ”—The mode in which this interrogation was received, shewed that it was thoroughly understood. Three or four, we could not say which, but certainly not more, held up their hands in token of their possession of such requisites to female comfort and decency. The next question was, “ How many have not a complete dress?”—Nearly the whole meeting immediately signified their destitute condition in this respect; and it further appeared that 508 had borrowed some article or other of clothing, in order to appear at the meeting. In further illustration of their condition it was ascertained that of those present 169 had been compelled to pledge their work in order to obtain necessaries ; and that 297 worked for “ sweaters,” parties whose calling has been amply ex¬ plained in the Letters upon the condition of the Metropolitan Poor. u How much,” it was next asked, u do the sweaters obtain from you out of every shilling ?”—The instant replies, from hundreds of voices, were “ twopence” and “ fourpence,” which being repeated, a female of considerable intelligence called out that the deduction averaged u threepence.” Adverting to household comforts, it was ascertained, in the next place, that only 58 were in the possession of blankets; that 151 had no beds to lie on ; that 45 had been compelled to pawn their beds to save themselves from starvation; and that the large proportion of 180 had been reduced to the necessity of selling their beds altogether. With respect to parochial assistance, it appeared that in the last week 464 had asked for it, and that 236 had obtained temporary relief. In 259 cases either temporary or permanent assistance had been denied ; and it was stated that slopwork is taken in at the workhouses of Bermondsey, Rotherhithe, Whitechapel, and Shoreditch. Another class of questions had reference to the treatment of the si op workers by their masters or employers. It appeared that all, or most of them, were expected to be at the shop for work at a certain 11 hour; but that they had sometimes to wait for it for different periods, varying from one hour to half a day. Three hundred and seventeen females indicated that they had been ill from being wet, and having taken cold when thus waiting; 73 had had work thrown upon their hands for having “ slimmed” it; 127 had been compelled to pay for buttons or parts of garments which they had never received ; and 20 declared they had been obliged to pay a penny apiece for buttons not worth a farthing. With reference to wages, 135 had been kept out of their earnings for one day, 148 for a week, and 75 had submitted to fines for having taken in their work “too late.” It was next ascertained that 232 had been obliged by poverty to leave their rooms or lodgings, unable to pay the rent. A great proportion of those present were married, but among them were 294 widows. Of those married 70 had one child, 90 had two, 79 three, 60 four, 39 five, 33 six, and 34 above six ; and, shouted a pale-faced elderly woman, “ Fve got ten.” There were 61 widows with one child, 52 with two children, 46 with three, 37 with four, 12 with five, 19 with six, and 13 with more than six children. There were 24 of these widows whose husbands had died of cholera, 39 who had been compelled to ask the parish to bury their husbands, 32 mothers (married women or widows) who had lost children by cholera, and 28 out of the 32 had been com¬ pelled to have their children buried at the expense of the parish. Only 23 of the females present admitted that they lived with men in an unmarried state, because they were unable to support them¬ selves. That there were more who were withheld by shame from confessing their condition may be fairly inferred from the fact, that on the question being put, how many would marry these men if they had the means ?—26 hands were held up. Thirteen of these un¬ married women had children. On the question being put—when bills appeared in the shop windows, advertising “ 500 hands wanted,” or “ 1,000 hands wanted”—whether, when they applied for the work thus offered, the masters advanced the prices ?—there was a unanimous cry of “ No, no, they lower them ! ” On the question being asked—how many had earned 8s. last week ?—not a hand was held up throughout the whole assembly. 7s. was next tried, but with a like result: five had earned, 6s., 12 28 had earned 5s., 12 had earned 4s. 6d ., 142 had earned 3s., 150 had earned 2s. 6d, 71 had earned 2s., 82 had earned Is. 6d., 98 had earned only Is., and of this last class 88 stated they were entirely dependent upon their own exertions for support; 92 females had earned under Is., and 223 had had no work at all during the whole of the week. It was then stated that a woman in the meeting had had five waistcoats which she had made returned upon her hands for defective work; and it was asked whether any other waistcoat maker would come forward and examine them. A young woman stepped forward, and after examining one of the waistcoats, the material of which was of striped silk, pointed out that the stripe of the pattern where the pocket was cut did not exactly correspond with those on the other $ part of the waistcoat; at the same time adding, that the cloth was often so unevenly cut that it was impossible for the best workwoman to make the patterns correspond. The woman who made the waist¬ coats said she was paid 9 d. a piece for them, and found trimmings besides. For the same waistcoat the Chairman declared the ordinary price in the trade would be 6s. On being asked how long it would take to make such a waistcoat as the one produced, the woman who had examined it said it could not be done in less than seven hours. She thought she could do it in that time. She called herself a good hand, but not one of the best in the trade. The following statement was read to the meeting:—“ Honored gentlemen—I am an orphan girl, having worked for the last eight years at the slop-work, and have not been able to get more than the small amount of 3d. or 4 d. for garments—namely, trowsers, waist¬ coats; shirts, 1 \d. ; and during that time have not been able to earn more than 4s. a week, and out of that had to find thread to the amount of 8 d., which would thus leave me—work, 4s.; twist, thread, and silk, 8 d .; total, 3s. 4 d .; to enable me to keep myself, after paying lodging, &c., 2s. 4 d. to subsist upon, being without any parents to assist me. Having made six waistcoats, and after making them at 4 d. each, when taken home they were thrown (on account of pressing) upon my hands, for which I had to pay the employer 15s., besides giving me in charge to a policeman.” Another woman here came upon the platform, bringing with her the frame of a sou’-wester, stitched through and across in all directions, which had been returned upon her hands because the 13 master said it was not sewn thick enough. For making these sou-’westers she said she received 2\d. each, and could not make more than two in a day, working from five o’clock in the morning till ten or eleven at night. Out of this scanty pittance she had to find thread, which she was obliged to buy at her employer’s shop, and sometimes he gave her whitey-brown thread and black work ; she was therefore obliged to buy black thread besides, and pay for both. Last Saturday night, being detained herself, she sent her work to the shop, when her master sent her back a pound of thread, for which he charged 2s ., and no ivork. Another woman stated that her husband had had only one month’s work since last Christmas-eve, and that was seven months ago. Pie had repeatedly applied for work, but being subject to fits he could find no employment. He had, however, a pension of 7 d. a day, which helped to pay the rent. She had six children entirely de¬ pending upon her, with the exception of the pension. She worked at shirt-making, for which she received 1 \d. and 2d. for full-breasted ones, finding thread, which cost her 3 d. a week. Her earnings ran from 2s. to 2s. 8 d .; she did not remember that she had ever earned 3s. Another woman stated that she had worked at slop-work for ten years. About two years ago she had a fever, contracted by a cold which she caught from insufficient clothes, and the consequence was that one of her arms was crippled, which sadly interfered with her work. She got *ld. for making a jacket—coats were from 10 d. to Is., and in all cases she had to find thread and twist. She could not finish one coat in a day. Her husband, who is a cripple, and sells oysters at the corner of a street, only earned Is. 9 d. last week. Another woman stated that her husband died of cholera five months ago, and that she had been left a widow with four children; two of them were entirely dependent upon her earnings. She worked at shirt-making as a second hand, and her earnings were never more than 2s. 6d. a week, often only Is. 6d. She received 1 \d. and \\d. a piece for the shirts; and the best were 2