~, “TNE ANALYTIC REPRESENTA LION OF SUB. STITUTIONS ON . POWER OF A PRIME NUMBER OF LETTERS WITH A. DIS CUSSION OF THE LINEAR GROUP. = A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF ARTS, LITERATURE, AND ~CIENCE, OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, IN CANDIDACY FOR THE PEGIREE.-+OF. “ROC TOR )F PHILOSOPHY. By LEONARD EUGENE DICKSON. Reprinted srom the Annals of Mathematics, 1897. a8 iS WZ WN Bis IS aN Z SW N — V/ ANS, VY ~ VR VII RYAN UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ic. 8651 01 S64 VNIVERSILY O; pipette clasts ~ ir 7, = : f ZG \ fe VW Fy H) MS \if Bg Ls

\ ra Wr ff | My if \ Vi G . la VAM | 4} | AI} SW \/ 1 L\ YAW Ss i AKG ] J r YJ\ > Veg | Pp S\N | US fate ee apa, sla 7,8 sie 4 ce is Bae SW SF y A NS > VAS $s IAIN ane ZL, AN is WZ 2S SUNG aS TAN i WV VAS NG VAY AN a VIS NAN DS IVI N JI RA ! =) * SVW/ IS WV < ep es Ai WW as VY) NAN IS JIN WV J IS ANAS <1, B, \ e D WY 7, ae ASW ORK Vy iN By P : a ve /j i] NW, PP Zstayst ges tte | KP ly + * slagtelas AN SEZ BZ, RRR ePR RK AS Ay AIS) 2 es See ree SENN: Z, ig RVAVAY Nan) WAAAY wae WIS Vi, f, gS ji DAYS IVINS <2 VWILVTIN NAS d below. A all overdue stampe o ae Qs) o = o) UH oO ie) se ° Te) e) 4 (eo) ) fol wn oe co ~ S H je] » o 4 charge is made on books. University of Illinois Library Latest Date COS ONOS SI m=O ANAS RENEE IVAN Z. ANA S IVS SBS LO yy Vg ‘ae YS) oy yyy ANY a f7 — S77 ee fe WAS JI e V/A WW \ NI f i= Ly e ~ YI SS f : VY MNS V/- I [ef NS = Z| SN [7 AN VW < 2 = AS “bs SS Z| Bis =) I) \S 7 A \ Ws — WI IV <7 ORGS IS ay IS SR ESE SAY ROK OK RIVET GIQSTASS RV — yo ITS ZASTSASIS OOO NGOS INGIN GND S/N NS ? Se SI ‘s IID IDY. ———— By SSE SSE SS IRV SIEGE RYAN WI N WIS TR KS iff 1] / > /7 S =—— SSIS N/A AOVY, = ANS = : : Ah, = GOTO PP. VAZIEs RL CK ig, >) ll I . = IN == = rail <— S S LISS ANWX 17 fi = — < = : i : ; = * : AY SS IS BS A, . ZI = S ! Z = : | SS : Za IX C \| ‘# : S1/ Z j i at Hees ; if Zs NY Z. [A y VMS TIX IS Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2021 with funding from | University of Illinois Uroana-Champaign https://archive.org/details/analyticrepresenOOdick | ae Deis Es ah) ae - 7 | ea ene ree “hth ak ne a Pag ve ae THE ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS ON A POWER OF A PRIME NUMBER OF LETTERS WITH A DIS- CUSSION OF THE LINEAR GROUP.* By Dr. Leonarp Eveene Dickson, Chicago, Ill. _ TABLE OF CONTENTS. Preface with literature. PART I.—AwnatytTic REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. Section I.— General Theory. Arts. 1- 2. Definitions. 3. Uniqueness of representation. 4— 5. Lagrange’s interpolation formula, 6— 7. De Polignac’s result anticipated. 8. Matrix property of substitution quantic. 9-11. Generalization of Hermite’s Theorem. 12. Reciprocal of a substitution quantic. 13-15. Residue of a multinomial coefficient (mod p). 16. Reduced form of substitution quantic. 17. Degree not a divisor of p” — 1. 18. &* a substitution quantic if % is prime to p" — 1. Szotion Il.—Quanties of degree prime to p. 20-45. Complete determination of reduced quantics of degree = 6 suitable on p” letters. 46-50. Preliminary study of septics. 51-56. Quantics with an infinite range of suitability. Section ITI.— Quantics of degree a power of p. 57-59. Quantics with all exponents powers of p. 60-68. General theorems on quantics of degree p”. 69-74. Determination of all reduced SQ[p"; p"], for p” = 7 and partially for p” = 11. 75-77, General types of SQ[ p”; p”]. Section 1V.—Degree a multiple, not a power, of p. 78-82. Determination of all reduced SQ [6; 3%]. 82-86. Special results on SQ[6; 2”]. Miscellany. 87. Table of all reduced SQ[%; p”"], k= 6. 88-89. Analytic generators of substitutions on 7 and 5 letters. 90. Enumerative proof of Wilson’s theorem. * Dissertation accepted by the University of Chicago in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. 149084 66 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. PART II.—Linzar Grovp. Section I.—Linear homogeneous group. 1. Definition of a linear homogeneous substitution. 2. Literal and analytic composition ; group. 3. Restriction to prime modulus. 4, Order of linear homogeneous group. 5. Transformation of indices; determinant invariant. — 7. Decomposition of a linear homogeneous substitution. 2. Factors of composition of linear homogeneous group. 3. A triply infinite system of simple groups. Srotion IIl.— Linear fractional group. 14. Definition, exhibition, and order. 15. Group of linear fractional substitutions with determinant unity is simple. 16-17. Remarks on systems of simple groups. Section III.— The Betti-Mathieu group. 18-19. Identification with the linear group. 20. Order of the group. 21-24. Mathieu’s special type of substitutions. PREFACE. This paper is an application of the Galois Field theory, a conception of fundamental importance in Higher Algebra. This theory is here presupposed and will be used in the abstract form given it by E. H. Moore.’ Reference may also be made to Galois,’ Serret’, Jordan*, Borel et Drach’, in a note by the latter the Galois Field being developed in its abstract form. The aim in Part I is two-fold: (1) the complete determination of all quantics up to as high a degree as practicable which are suitable to represent substitutions on p” letters, p being a prime, 2 an integer; (2) the determi- nation of special quantics suitable on p” letters, where for each quantic the combination ( p, 2) takes infinitely many values. It is a remarkable fact that, on the one hand, the conditions necessary and sufficient to determine a substitution quantic are found by multinomial expansions,—on the other hand, one of the observed types of substitution quantics having an infinite range of suitability is a multinomial expansion ‘Moore, Proceedings of the Congress of Mathematics of 1893, at Chicago. * Galois, Bulletin des Sciences mathématiques de M. Férussac, vol. 13, p. 428, 1830; reprinted in Liouville’s Journal de Mathématiques, vol. 11, pp. 398-407, 1846. *Serret, Algebre supérieure, fifth edition, vol. 2, pp. 122-189. ‘Jordan, 7’raité des substitutions, pp. 14-18. °Borel et Drach, 7'héorie des Nombres e¢ Algébre supériewre, 1895, pp. 42-50, 58-62; Note, pp. 343-350. f DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 67 (multiplied by a power of the variable) and the other type a reverse-binomial expansion (see $§ 53-54). The results of this investigation warrant the conjecture that there exist a small number of types of substitution quantics of such wide ranges that together they represent all the py”! substitutions on p” letters. Examples where appar- ently isolated quantics fall under a general type (when it is not reduced) are given in § 77. While the aim in Part II* is primarily to generalize the work of Jordan on the linear homogeneous group, the treatment has been considerably modi- fied to render the subject more accessible. The desire being chiefly non-¢yclic¢ simple groups, the modulus is supposed prime, which affords much simplifica- tion. On the other hand, many amplifications occur and also the correction of several errors (indicated by foot-notes). In the same investigation there may occur marks of the Galois Fields of orders p', p”, amd p”™, n > 1, m > 1, when (as a useful notation) we use small Roman, small Greek, and capital Roman letters respectively. Literature on the analytic representation of substitutions : M. Hermite, Sur les fonctions de sept lettres, Comptes Rendus des Seances de L’ Académie des Sciences, vol. 57, pp. 750-757, 1863. Hermite’s results (in whole or part) are given by: Serret, Cours D’ Algébre supérieure, vol. 2, pp. 883-389 and 405-412 ; Netto, Swbstitutionentheorie, ch. 8 ; Jordan, 7raité des Substitutions, pp. 88-91 ; Borel et Drach, Zhéorte des Nombres et Algebre supérieure, pp. 305-807, 1895. Enrico Betti, Sopra la risolubilita per radicali delle equazioni algebriche irriduttibili di grado primo, Annali di Scienze Matematiche e Fisiche, vol. 2, pp. 5-19, 1851; Sudla risoluzione delle Equazioni algebriche, ibid, vol, 3, pp. 49-115, 1852 ; Sopra la teorica delle sostituzioni, ibid, vol. 6, pp. 5-34, 1855. Emile Mathieu, J/émoire sur le nombre de valeurs que peut acquérir une Jonction quand on y permute ses variables de toutes les maniéres possibles, Journal de Mathématiques pure et appliquées, second series, vol. 5, pp. 9-42, 1860 ; Mémoire sur Vetude des fonctions de plusieurs quantités, sur la maniére de les former et sur les substitutions qui les laissent invariables, ibid, vol. 6, pp. 241-323, 1861. F. Brioschi. Des substitutions de la forme n—3 I iy he ul en * For the suggestion of this generalization as leading to a triply infinite system of simple groups, as also for much yaluable aid throughout the investigation, I am indebted to Professor Moore. 68 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. pour un nombre n premier de lettres, Mathematische Annalen, vol. 2, pp. 467- 470, 1870. De Polignac, Sur la représentation analytique des substitutions, Bulletin de la Societé Mathématique de France, vol. 9, pp. 59-67, 1881. A. Grandi, Un teorema sulla rappresentazione analitica delle sostituziont sopra un numero primo di elementi, Giornale Matematico del Prof. G. Batta- glini, vol. 19, pp. 288-245. The conditions are found under which 5 gies eP-*§ 4 an 2 -+ ba shall represent a substitution on p letters. A generalization by the same writer is given in’ Reale Istituto Lombardo di scienze e lettere, Leendiconti, Milano, vol. 16, pp. 101-111. For abstracts of each see Fortschritte der Mathematik, vol. 13, p. 118, 1881, and vol. 15, p. 116, 1883. J. L. Rogers, On the Analytical [representation of Heptagrams, London Mathematical Society, vol. 22, pp. 87-52, 1890. L. E. Dickson, Analytic Functions Suitable to Represent Substitutions, American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 18, pp. 210-218, 1896. PART I.—AnatytTic REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS ON A POWER OF A PRIME NuMBER OF LETTERS. Section I.—General Theory. 1. Let ¢ be any mark of the Galois Field of order p”, p being a prime and n a positive integer. Also let ~(&) be an integral function of ¢ having as coefficients certain marks of the @#'[p"]. The replacing of the letter lz by the letter dy. defines a substitution on p” letters, in notation, e == O45). 2. In order that ¢ (¢) shall indeed be suitable to represent a substitution on the marks Vi ie OM ee po) it is necessary and sufficient that v (™), ¢ (M4), ---, Y (Mp1), be identical with Moy Py +++ Upn—1 except as to order. If an integral function of degree / belong- ing to the GF’ | p”"| satisfies these conditions, it will be called a substitution quantic of degree & on p" letters and denoted thus SQ[z; p"). DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 69 The degree /# will be supposed < p” owing to the equation eee, satisfied by every mark of the field. 3. Theorem. Two different quantics ¢(&) and $(§) belonging to the GH'[ p"| cannot represent the same literal substitution. For if the substitution replace the index yp; by py, fori = 0,1,..., p? —1, then must Gh Wee tip i hh ( 14,) (tee Oe ps 1); CO ie) ae U is of degree p" — 1 at most but has ~” distinct roots y; It is thus an identity in &. Thus 4. The most evident substitution quantic is the integral function ¢ (¢) which gives Lagrange’s interpolation formula: n—]l es egg D vl) ¢ (é) ; = (= ms ti) Fm) (1) where @), 4, ..., @pn_; is any permutation of 0,1,..., py’ —1, and where pr—1 UES) = af (¢ — and /” denotes its derivative. Thus represents the substitution Me. Pee rise gees | Cae Pays «+> ig ee J 5. Following Hermite’s method* for the case n = 1, we may give (1) a simpler form. ; In the G/F'[ p"), Le vie Pa or (eet Le pl 5, pt may é) is : VW fa\> Mats oan a i=0 Ser vi Taking 4, = 0, so that pe = 1 = 0 (Hee ey 2 1) - * Cf Serret, 1. c. 2, pp. 384-5. 70 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. and performing the division by § — yy, pr—] L > © = g (E) = — pa, (€?" — 1) — 2 Halen te fee ee ees ‘i= Arranging according to powers of ¢ and noting that* prt fa eas = we reach the desired quantic, pr—2 es eee ¢ (§) = os" (2) j= where pr— = v a ee a a; ne ed ai . be ij (7 : 0, ix a fie <> 2). (3) i=0 It follows from § 3 that every substitution quantic on p” letters which belongs to the G/’[ p”] is contained in the form (2). 6. The conditions on a, that an arbitrary quantic n—] g(§)= = af! j=0 belonging to the G/’[ p"] shall represent a substitution on its p" marks yp, are pr—l1 v pees es : 2, Gps SOX) (ee eee) j=0 where o(4,) — fq, form a permutation of y, Applying the lemma proven in § 10, we have on adding the p” equations (4), pr—l aS ss ee Opn a D (fi) =.0, i=0 Taking a,,_, zero and dropping the first one of the equations (4), we have the system of conditions fy Gp = 04) ie Lee , pn —1). (4) j=0 The determinantt ; | | = Th, — 8 where’?,. 8 S12)... pa ere We may thus express a; linearly in terms of 4, By equation (2) of § 5, this is done by formula (3). * pr—1 pr—1 s% sy “ a= + My = 0 by § 10. i=) : i=0 + Baltzer, Theorie und Anwendung der Determinanten, p. 85. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. (io 7. The gist of De Polignae’s paper is to actually solve equations (4) for the case 2 = 1. Using @ and m for the integers corresponding to the marks a and yp, his result is given in the form Lay teen be RE oe a= 2 {(—1)’ —2 } m eed | aid where previously m,, has been taken to be zero. Subtracting pot (—1). 2 m,, = 0 (mod p), i=l re Pens = (= 1 Cae ra = aes We ae — es ers THU ake foe) — = 8. We may independently verify the inverse character of the linear rela- tions (3) and (4) between the coefticients a; of any substitution quantic ¢ (¢) and the marks ¢(4;) = ,, By (4’) the matrix 4 2 r—? ~ (hee ST Ae ee ee ee ine je ee ? : VF 2 pr—2 el b] pr» UL pr—1) eine e) <9 (Tres expresses 9(1;), 9 (M2), ---, G (Mp1) linearly in terms of @, %, ..., Gn» Inversely, by (3) the cine So ee ea DS ae en ee ee | me pr—2 pr—2 eos, pr—2 | ty és me 925) 3 3 Tae Upn-1 * " « © at pr-3 = p"--3 nae 3 pr—3 ee | eae P LE ha ea ean ‘9 —— 'y ; == 2 ) Sino! Sty L Ayyn—1 J expresses the latter linearly in terms of the former. To prove that the product of the two matrices is the identity, let c’ denote the term in the product derived from the 7th row of the first and the jth column of the second matrix. Then pr—2 te Ae pr— 3 a. pr—2 ij pe M5 aes fi Kj ‘ Cy =—_—- i L Thus C= (pl) 4 1 (tg et nee 1 77 ere hs) 72 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. For 4,7 =.) 2). De oe ee pn i Ls i) als pr—l pr—2 pr—2 pr—1 es a =—- IF shat SUR Sih peti ew UTE + By és ae 2 J i Nee Hence ¢, = 0.if ¢ 9: Fromrthe matrix expressing ¢ (y,) in terms of @, G,..., Gn—2, We derive by reflection on its main diagonal and change of sign of all its elements a matrix which expresses 4, Gpn_o, Zyn_3, ---, @, In terms of gM) (i 1) Oe ep eed 9. Lemma. , 4), +--+ Mp1, being the marks of the G/’'[ p"] and ¢a posi- tive integer, n—] ; —1l1fort?=p"—1 hier i=0 For let ¢, denote the sum of the ¢th powers of the roots of the equation belonging to the G/'[ p”] Bye" =0 (yw =1). (5) i=0 Applying Newton’s identity (as is allowable) Opt Yi Fe + Ye Opn Fe HAG + hy, HO. (hl) If for (5) we take the equation whose roots are y,, ae eo eae the proof of the lemma follows. | 10. Lemma. If, in the notation of § 9, ss (teal oe, oon Toad ae Girone) |z + 0, (mod p) Ube and if all the roots of equation (5) be marks of the G/’{ p"], then will (5) take the form prs yee dae 0s Applying Newton’s identity cited above, we find Wa Sat, (ae Pye Ves (2 + 0 (mod p) ey CP ge ips 8h aide ee iN DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 73 To determine ¥,, Yop, - ++» Ypn—p» apply the identity Dre Oe tke eo Vg be = O (AS p"); which reduces to Oy, oa YnFk—p > YopFr—2p si\3 pases oe @ pn—1F pnt af Y pr F —pn — 0 . < By our assumption on the roots, IF, = Ferpn-i+ Hence fork = p, + p—1, YpF pp = 0. Generally, for k = p" + Ilp—1, le p™ —1, yl, Fyn == 0 = Since o,,_, $ 0 by hypothesis, ¥,, = 0. 11. Generalization of Hermite’s Theorem. The necessary and sufficient conditions that ¢(&) shall be suitable to represent a substitution on p” letters are : (1) Every tth power of ¢(&), for i << p" —1 and prime to p, shall reduce to a degree = p"™ — 2 when we lower the exponents of € below p” by means of the equation Epn — = = O . > = > (2) There shall be but one distinct root of 3 p»—1 7 =; g (§) ome jem D Proof: Suppose After reducing exponents below p” let rn x p =f as [y is S= > ames! ; 1=0 Give to € the values of the p” marks yw; of the field and add the resulting equalities. pr—l1 pr—1 re [e(y)]™ —— pra” — a,” 2 yy af kp =f. ag, ay ip = [= Hence by § 9, form < p" —1, yn—] (m) ~ [eo (4) = — ay . j=—O 74 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. But if g (€) represents a substitution, pr—l pr—1 2 [¢y (4) |" = py ign ee 0 7=0 7=0 ifm < p"—1. Hence a necessary condition is Co Oe (Wie lion a Oe ce) wr —-1 Also there must be one and only one of the marks ¢ (y;) equal to zero, i. e. but one distinct root of g(¢) = 0. ‘ Inversely, suppose (1) and (2) are satisfied, so that pel te Ne ae sa) p ee 4) ( te : 4 = l¢ (4) | = Apr = ( ¢ $ O (mod Pp) j pr— I [eo (4) ]?"7* = —140. LY vO Then by § 10 the equation pr—1 ff [7 — ¢ (w)l= 9 j= takes the form ea a Yor 7] + Yon == 0 7] (1 “= Won 4) ae Yoon == 0 * or If y,,_, + — 1, this linear equation is satisfied by the p” marks ¢(y,). These must therefore be equal, and since their sum is zero, each must be zero. But in this case the equation belonging to our field, pr—2 gE) ==. 50,5 = 0 1=0 would have p” distinct roots ¢ = y; (i = 0, 1, ..., p” —1) which is impossible. Hence y,,_, = — 1 and then, since one of the ¢ (,)’s are zero, y,, = 0. Thus the marks (#,) are identical apart from order to the roots y; of 7" re y) —s @) , 12. Reciprocal* of a substitution quantic. Given a substitution quantic pr—2 , z = OAS) eee eer * Rogers, l. ec. for p» = 7. His proof is objectionable, since he makes £° — 1 (mod 7) while ~ is to be taken = 0. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 75 Suppose its reciprocal is pr—2 Ee VS Q.pr—1-—t = 2 pyr. 11 Then yn—] Sy = S [gy (E) = 2 aor", I after reduction of exponents asin $11. On the other hand, pr—2 ft SV Q.-,p"—1—i+2z Q -t—1 9 --t—2 QD ag pr—I i2 agtt1 eee oe Sapna et pa se Pp i=! epr—1 Since 7 = ¢(€) is a SQ[ ; p”], then 7’ contains no term ¢’"” as long as j 1. For on raising it to the power ( 7” — 1)/k the coefticient of ¢”""' is 1 + 0. 18. Theorem. €*is a SQ [k; p"] if and only if k be relatively prime to p” — 1. For, / being any integer < p” — land prime to p, // must not be a mul- tiple of p” — 1 (by § 11). Corollary.—The extraction of /th roots in the GP’ py is always possible (and then uniquely) if and only if / be prime to p” — 1. Secrion Il.— Degree k prime to p. 19. Using the same method as in my papert giving a complete list of SQ [(k; p'] for & < 7 and p any prime, I shall first determine all SQ[k; p”] for k < 7, p any prime not a divisor of #, and n any integer. After a pre- liminary study of septics, I shail conclude Section II with the derivation of a remarkable class of substitution quantics of arbitrary odd degree /. Complete determination of reduced quantics of degree k < 7 suitable to represent substitutions on p" letters, p being prime not a divisor of k, $$ 20-45. 20. S is suitable for every p”. 21. is the reduced quadratic and is rejected by $17 since p” is odd. 22. zs Ae On. (a) The case p” of the form 3m + 1 is rejected by § 17. (b) The case p” = 38m + 2. Then (& + a€)"t! gives (m + 1) aas the coefficient of ¢”"t'. Hence, by * By making use of the indeter aay By ® further reduction may often be. made in ¢,(&). The simplest form thus obtainable is called ultimately reduced. Thus 4 + 35 reduce to £4 + 32, + American Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 18, pp. 210-218, 1896. 78 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. §$11,a = 0; forif m + 1 were divisible by p, then would also 3m + 3 or p" +1. The remaining form & is suitable by § 18. 23. ¢¢ + a& + Bé. The only case to consider here is p" = 4m + 3. The m + Ist power requires (m + 1)a=0 ora = 0. (& + &)"+? requires Mee ah ie soda) f* = 0, provided p" > 7. Hence 8 = 0; for if m + 2 be divisible by p then is also 4m + 8 or p” + 5,1. €. p = 5, while p must be of the form 4/ + 3. But & is rejected by § 18, viz, by the power / = 2m be J J > P WF For the case above excluded, p = 7,” = 1, we have Hermite’s result, the suitable quartics € + 36. Reduced quintic & + a& + B& + 7&, S$ 24-44. 24. The case p” = 5m + 2. Hence v is odd. The power m + I requires (m+ 1)7 + Me. genie a= ();, But m + 1 is divisible by p only ifp = 3. Thusif p ¢ 3, By = (1) The power m + 2 requires if p” > 7 (m + 2)(m Toa 1)” (6apy + f+ (im — 1) 088} = 0. Hence if p + 2 and p” > 7, 5 (6af7 + #) —Ta fs = 0. (2) From (1) and (2), if p + 2 and ¢ 3 and if p” ¢ 7, Ye am Ti he (3) The power 7 + 3 requires if p” > 7 hes doy? + 66%)? + = F (100%? + 30a%8% + 5465) (m —1)(m — 2 ne 2 m —1)(m — 2)(m — 3), 4 zat *) (Gaby + bata") + | Aire Ue Now m + 3 is divisible by p only if» = 13. Hence if p is neither 2 nor 13 we may divide off the binomial factor ¢,"**. Multiplying the resulting equa- DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 19 tion by 5*, replacing 5 (m — 1) by — 7, etc., we have for p” not 2”, 7', 13” the condition 20a (5y)* + 1508? (57)? — 700? (57)? — 1050026? (57) — 875u/f' + 8405 (57) + 10500%f? — 3407 — 0. (4) Applying (1) to (4): 15006? — 8750p = 0, from which by (3) we find # = 0. For the proof that the resulting form Be + Bas? + aff does represent a substitution on p” = 5m + 2 letters, a being arbitrary, see Secbe. 2h. ne case p” == 13" == Ben + 2. The powers m + 3, m + 4, m + 5 give identities. The power m + 6 requires Co else nr =.0 or a B=. 0: For, 5m + 2 — 0 (mod 13)1. e. m = 10 (mod 13). Thus c¢/"* or ¢/%** is + 0 Oily 0K cal 2 o.10, 14, 15,°16,26,...,, by §'14. It follows from this equation and (3) that 8 = 0. 26, Che. case p —- 1, n= 1. Hermite gave the complete list of suitable forms : SVy Snes & + af + & + 8s, a = quadratic non-residue of 7. & + af + 3a, a = arbitrary. The last may be written 5& + 5a& + a6. 27. The case p” = 3” = 5m + 2. The powers m + 2 and m + 3 require by (2) and (4) 2h = ap (2’) a — oP + afft—a = 0. (4') Since n S 3, 5m + 2 = 0 (mod 27) or m = 5 (mod 27). Hence e"** or of"*" IocteOnl yl Awaeeeleeneo, LOLI or. 27. The power m + 6 thus requires, if 2 > 3, Gye Up eens 3 OK (5’) 80 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. Thus § = 0 and (4’) becomes a(iyt@)(7+y7e? —a)=—0. Ifa+0,7 = — @; for if the last factor vanishes, (Com ene ee ; while — 1 is a not-square in the G/’[3'] and hence in the GF [8"], n being odd. If a = 0, the power m + 9 of & + 7€ requires MOA alae ca eee ete ge ty pt a) The possible form is thus 5 + 506 + o&& when n > 3. 28. The case p” = 3°. The powers 11 and 13 require B+ af =0 (5”) et deo wT aes ae eo (6") Suppose § +0. Then by (2’), # = — a’, so that (5’) is satisfied and (4’) becomes Og i ee But if either 7 = 0 or 7 = @, (6”) requires that 8 =0. Since f = 0 we have y = — @ as in the case n > 3. 29. The case p” = 2" = 5m + 2. Since 7 S 5, m = 6 (mod 32). The power m + 5 requires Cite ee mt bot ae (oregon Applying (1), 7 = a’, this becomes e+) =O. © (7) The power m + 7 requires Ligtre tO, af+a¢h + a*=—0. Applying (1) this becomes a’f* = 0. Hence # = 0. For n = 5, the 13th power requires a condition which on applying (1) becomes exactly the fourth power of (7). For n = 5, the 15th power requires P+ BP + all + BP + ah + byt + BP + by + RP + By + aft = 0. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 81 Applying (1) this becomes aft (a + aG* + BY) —0. (8) If 6 + 0, #° = @ by (7), whence (8) becomes a’ = 0. Hence must 8 = 0. 30. Summary of §$§ 24-29. The only possible reduced substitution quintic on p” == 5m + 2 letters is beverebas 4 aes) « arbitrary, except for p = 7, = 1 when we have two additional forms : £4 of t P4 ah + 4 80%, where @ is a quadratic non-residue of 7. 31. The case p” = 5m + 3. The power m + 1 requires (m+ 1)f8=0. Hence ifp+2,8=0. The power m + 2 of & + a& + 7€ requires Cae - ae Ae : Say ae ee a = 0) , (1) If p + 7 we may divide out ¢,’"**, giving readily 257? — l5dey + 2a = 0. Hence, if p + 2, + 7, either 57 = @ or 57 = 2a”. The power m + 4 requires for p” > 13, Oy ero eee LUC a la 4 Cot, Sale Gt a == 0. (2) If p is not 2,3, 7 or 17, we may divide out (m + 4) (m + 3) (m + 2) (m + 1)m, multiply by 5*.7! and replace 5(m — 1) by — 8, ete., giving 2104 (57)* — 8 .140a' (57)? + 8. 13. 21a (57)? — 8.13 . 18a’ (57) + 23. 260° — 0. If 5; = @’, this becomes a’ (210 — 8.140 + 8.13.21 —8.13.18 + 23.26) =—0, in which the coefficient of @ is identically zero. If 5; = 2a’, the coefficient of a’ reduces to — 10. Hence in this case 4 = 7 = 0. Thus for p” not 2”, 3", 7, 17" or 18, the only possible quintic on py” = 5m + 3 letters is reducible to SIS Ya ST aie 82 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 32. For p = 13, n = 1, I have elsewhere* shown that the only suitable quintics are 56° + 5u& + a&, a@ = arbitrary. 5& + 5a& + 2a, a = quadratic non-residue of 13. 33. The case p” = 17" = 5m + 3. The value 57 = 2a’ is rejected since the equation be? - halt = Aas = 0 has a solution + 0 for every a when p = 17. Thus 5 (€* + a& — 3a’) = 0 has the solutions ¢? = 44 and — 5a. Now — 5isa not-square in the G/’[17'] and hence also in the G/’[17"], x being odd. Thus whether a be a square or a not-square, we have a solution ¢ + 0 belonging to the field. 34. The case yp" = 7” = 5m + 3d. The condition (2) of § 31 becomes 5.8. 9a, — 230 = 0. Thus either == 0) ory ion, But the power m + 6 of © + 7€ requires 7’ = The only possible form is thus 5& + 5aé* + a6. 35. The case p” = 3” = 5m-+8. The condition (2) of § 31 becomes since m — 21 (mod 27), Oe ; 200°? - oh = a + ii — O . Hence 57 = a’. 36. The case p” = 2” = 5m + 3, supposing x > 3. Thus 5m — — 3 (mod 2’) or m — 25 (mod 128). The powers m + 2 and m + 4 of & + a& + B& + 7€ give 7 ay + af? = 0 at +a=0. Heneaif.a == 0,7 =.0 Sila 2100 eee But the power m + 22 of & + #¢ requires Cue ‘ jes — p® — O : The only possible form is again 5& + 5a& + a. * American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 18, p. 213. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 83 37. The case p” = 2°. The third and fifth powers require respectively Yta@ayrit+ af = 0 TY ay' + a8 ==1()7 of which the former is the square of the latter. Hence either 4 = 7 = 0 or Die pate But & + f¢* vanishes for ¢ = f®, every mark in the GH [2°] being a cube by § 18. By replacing = by a'*¢ and 7 by a’, the quintic becomes = - Y (é) == ra aE ae -- (a*y ae aty*) &2 at ve OUP +O + +E + rh Hence the quintic ¢(€) will vanish only for ¢ = 0 if the resultant of P+&E + (747) 4 7é and & = 1 is +0. This resultant may be written as a cyclic determinant whose first row is Ore Oe ee 7 eer Oe On expansion it becomes rete tae fae he DG aH)» which is + 0 only when 7 = 1. The only suitable quintic on 8 letters is thus e 4 06° + ws. 38. Summary of $$ 51-37. The only possible substitution quantic on p” = 5m + 3 letters is reducible to the form Bot bak oe, a arbitrary , except for p” = 13 when we have the additional form Dee tOUs 20, a being a quadratic non-residue of 13. 39. Theorem. 5 + 5as3 + oS, where «a is an arbitrary mark of the GF'{ p], is suitable to represent a substitution on its p® marks, if p is a prime: number of the form 5m + 2 and n is odd. 84 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. For if not we must have for two different values of €, say 7 and g, the following equation : 57? aN Sax? SE an — dy? a 5ag® =" ao or (9 — 9) {50 eet IG Ora Ne Para erate earn Hence since 7 ¢ ¢, Sift Ee +e +ae+yg+¢)p+e=0. (1) (a) Suppose p > 2. Making the substitution i oe i ee 5 {5M + LOR? + pt + 8a”? 4+ av?} + & = 0. Multiply by 16 and substitute 202 = 40—a, 4 = 46 —a4. We thus reach the simple form , 16 (eo? + 1006 + 50°) = 0, or (0 -|- 5a) = 2007 = 5 (20) F But* + 5 is a quadratic residue of no odd number of the form 5m + 2 or 5m + 8. Hence 5 is a not-square in the G/'[ p"], n being odd and Dp = OM. seas (b) Suppose p = 2. Making in (1) the substitution Pa Para a reals M+ ah + a = (Ph + pt a). (2) Put ? = v and multiply through by » + pw: Ytar+av=w + a/+ en. (3) But, by § 18, = is suitable to represent a substitution on 2” letters, 2 odd, and hence is also §+a~pt+@[8 4 a 4+ @. Hence (3) has no solution in the G/’[2”] except » = yp, when by (2) we find y= pL == @; * Gauss, Disquisitiones Arithmetical, Art. 121. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 85 Hence if (1) is satisfied, we have 2 Ths a Ue But this set of values for 7 and ¢ is impossible since wo + afw + a0 has no root in the GF'[2"], n odd, if a+0, i. e. if 7 +g. For writing w = @4, it becomes eee ee OF We thus need only prove that # — 1 = 0 has no root other than 6 = 1 in the G/F’ [2"], n odd. But if there exists a root + 1 of Ce 1) (and thus having the exponent 3) which is also a root of Goan Lea then* must 2 be even. A general theorem comprising the one here proven is given in § 54. 40. The case p” = 5m + 4. The power m + 1 of & + a& + BE + yé gives a = 0. The power m + 2 of & + fs + 7€ requires Geen Oe, Hence if p + 2, + 3, we have fy = 0. The power m + 3 requires, if p” > 9, (Pah gap aa reed ott UF Now m + 3 is divisible by p only if p = 11, when p” is not of the form 5m + 4. If p = 2 (and thus n S 6, we have m — 12 (mod 64). Hence for every p” > 9, SF pice =e oe Thus for p + 2, + 3, 8 = y = 0 and © is the only suitable form. 41. The case p” = 3" = 5m + 4,2 > 2. The power m + 4 requires, since m — 1 (mod 9), oh4 1087 = B= 0. Hence © is the only suitable quintic. *Moore, 1. c. § 46. 86 tively, DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 42. The case p” = 37. The fourth, fifth, and seventh powers of ¢ + f€ + 7€ require respec- rdit+r)+F#=0 Pau+/7)=0 aad +7) =0. The solutions of these equations are B30 Sy s=0 Gand. OFS 0 eal eee The suitable forms are thus SUC CNY ete igh a since if the latter vanished for ¢ + 0, €* = 2. Indeed # + 23° represents the literal substitution, (0) (1,1 =e O19) (= 0 ee eee 43. The case p” = 2" = 5m + 4. The power m + 11 requires, since m = 64/ 4+ 12, Cee F has == Bon ee 0) : Hence § = 7 = 0 and © is the only suitable form. 44. Summary of $$ 40-43. © is the only reduced substitution quintic on nr Pp = 5m + 4 letters, except for p” = 3’ when we have also ¢ + 2c. 45. & + af + BE + 7s? + O86. p” = 6m + 5, since here p is prime to 6 and since p” + 6m + 1. The power m + 1 requires 4 = 0. The power m + 2 of & + fe" + 7& + OF requires 230 + 7? = 0. The power m + 3 requires, if p” > 11, 6y0" + m (20 + 3/7”) = 0. The power m + 4 requires, if p” > 17, o +2 (20pa* + 208/49 + 7°) + M4) emo + 15044) = 0. (1) (2) (3) DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 87 Substituting 7° from (1) into (2) and (3), 670? — 4mf?o = 0 (4) A OWbie oss m\(m — 1) a5 eH ae Bd? — 4m il 1) os = 0. (5) I 5 : From (4) and (5) M4 4m (2m == 1) Oa 5 od = 0. (6) Multiplying (1) by m° and subtracting from (2), 670? + 2m??? — 0. Ii p = 5, m = 0 (mod 5), so that yo? = 0 and then by (6)0 = 0. Ifp: 5, suppose; +0. Then mPr = — 30. Substituting this in (5), 230* — 4m(m — 1) f'0 = 0. Combining with (6), (41m — 18) ot = 0 or 3130 = 0. Since 313 is a prime not of the form 6m + 5,¢0 = 0. Hence must 7 = 0, so that fo = 0 and by (6) d= 0. But the power 3m + 2 of & + f& gives get? and no other term with exponent divisible by 6m + 4. Hence there is no suitable sextic when p” > 17. I have shown* that p = 17, = 1 leads to no suitable septic ; while p = 11,7 = 1 leads to the following substitution quantics : A preliminary study of septics, $$ 46-50. ay £5 Q&4 We Ne2 oe Set Ose ee oun 11 oe rr Okeer tet, 46. The case p” = Tm + 6. The power m + 1 requires a = 0. The power m + 2 requires, if p + 2, Tpe + Tyo — B= 0. (1) ~ American Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 18, pp. 216-217. 88 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. The power m + 3 requires, if p > 5 and p” + 13, 9 9 a2 la¥. Dw) 20 gt ia la (xe? + Oe) — 7 (6Pre + 38/0" + 68770 4 9 7) + 9 Cer (2) Rejecting the special values, 2, 5, 13, etc., we may prove that if any one of the four coefficients /, 7, 0, ¢ be zero, then all are zero. To handle (1), (2) and the very lengthy conditions given by the powers m + 4 and m + 5; when f, 7, 0, ¢ are all + 0, is perhaps impracticable. Suppose, for example, 7 = 0. Then (1) and (2) become Thus =-0 4 foriiynot Te 32 and thusggy—= of - The power m + 5 of & + fé + e€ requires Teo — 7! 15 Ret + 73. 6522 — 7, 180 fhe? + a 27 g, _ 13.51 - Pe — 14 Baie) If # + 0, # = Te and the last equation becomes — f° = 0. Thus if 7 = 0, then 8 = 0 = ¢ = 0, certain values of p” being excepted. 47. The case p” = 7m + 5. The power m + 1 requires 6 = 0. If either a, 7, or ¢ be zero, we can prove that all are zero. If 0 = 0, the conditions given by the powers m -++ 2 and m -++ 4 (of 5 and 19 terms respectively) are satisfied by Cte) 2G" ite aes. 48. The case p” = 7m + 4. The power m + 1 requires, if p + 3, 7 = 20". We may prove that if a ='0, then B= jy =6 =e = 0; thatil p — 0 then 0 =) andre = 0% 49. The case p” = Tm + 3. The power m + 1 requires, if p ¢ 2, 70 = 3af. We may prove that if a = 0, then B = 7 = 0 =e = 0; if 8 = 0 then 0 = 0 and the conditions given by the powers m + 2 and m + 4 (containing seven and twenty-one terms respectively) are seen to be satisfied by \ Yemen Lee ees 50. The case p® = Tm + 2. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 89 The conditions are quite unwieldly even when a = 0. If 3 = 0, then GeO ma AOS eS Oe Quantics with an infinite range of suitability, $$ 51-56. 51. We have found that the quintic b=” 4 bak? aE , a. being an arbitrary mark of the G/’'[ p"], is suitable to represent a substitu- tion on its p” marks, if and only if p" be of the form 5m + 2. Also in our preliminary survey of septics, the quantic CE ae 2. Take? 4 ae , a. being an arbitrary mark of the G/'[ p"], stood out in a prominent way as probably suitable on its py” marks if and only if p” be of the form 7m + 2 or 7m + 3. Note further that there is no suitable cubic other than €. Thus is suggested the possible existence of a quantic of odd prime degree & which is suitable to represent a substitution on the marks of every G/'[ p"], except when p” is of the form Am + 1. 52. Suppose the reduced quantic belonging to the G/’[ p"], Si SAC a ks es Co eae SiR ad a (1) whose degree / is an odd prime number ¢ 7, is suitable to represent a substi- tution on the p” marks of the field for every p” of the form Am + 2, km + 38, km + 4, ..., or, km + (k — 3). We do not at first assume it suitable on p" = km + (k — 2) letters, in which case the power m + 1 requires (m4 Ly a, == a, == 0, 1f pt 2. For p” = km + (k — 3), the power m + 1 requires (m +1)a,+ (m = 1)m fit ee A), or, if p + 3, k= 33 2 9 hie Ce For p" = km + (k — 4), the power m + 1 requires if p ¢ 2, ka, = (k — 4) aa, . For p" = km + (k — 5), the power (m + 1) requires, if p + 5, _ k(k—5) : ger as iy Ka, 9 (45° + 20,44) + ( Z ase ) Gees 90 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. or 2 A) : kik —5 ; kG, = ( kts E ») Os ae ( 7 5) Oy For:p” = km + (& — 6), the power m + 1 requires, if p + 2, + 3, ka, — k (k —B6) (020 + O04) + (ie) ee ay eer Ae or Ka. = ( aes k — 5)(k—6) _, 9 a. Similarly, for p” = km + (k& — 7), the power m + 1 requires, if p ¢ 7, (ees 31.2) @—T) 1 4 b= 8) UB a Ka, = for p" = km + (k — 8), p ¢ 2, the power m + 1 requires io, — 4 —9) © cil (k= 8) p54 4 Bk =e ws BS) for p" = km + (k — 9), p + 8, the power m + 1 requires 5 he ee ee ( Cate ae (he — 6) (eB) ee) 4 k— T){k— 8) (k—9) ee 2.3.4.5 4 It would be impracticable to attempt to calculate the general coefficient in this way. Itis to be noted that if p > & every coefficient is expressed uniquely in terms of a, and 4. 53. The sum s, of the /th powers of the roots of the cubic e Os is given by Waring’s formula thus : DY m(A or A, sic A, — 1) r ne Bae tin p ye - 285} 3 * acre (Apes ea SPOS SES (3) where z (¢) = ¢! with the convention that z(0) = 1, and where the summation extends over /,, 4,, 4, such that peas Say yee Bee 7 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 91 Arranging according to descending powers of €, we have > feo) i ‘ e383 Pia Se dace se “Egy apa , K—A = azgk—t 1 © gg Eb-s ke Ne es ah eek Os deal See Ie 2y,Ek—7 ba oth 0) (el k —6)(k—T7 2) ses iE DIO, er WED caste k — 6) (k — 7) (k—8) k — 7) (k — ay ESSE DE) 3, PDR 8) 0} on (k — 6) (k —1) (k —8)(k—9) 5 , (E—T)(k—8)(k—9 = BI A ho 4h Thus the first ten coefticients in s, are exactly the corresponding coefii- cients of the quantic (1) as calculated in § 52. A complete identification of s, with (1) will be carried out for the most interest case, viz, when a, = 0, which happens when the range of suitability of (1) excludes only the com- binations p” = km + 1. For then by § 54 the quantic s,(€) will satisfy the conditions derived by the method of § 52 which have an unique solution in terms of 4. For a, = 0, (3) reduces to Pe (k —1—1) oe. AG Zest \ ; Ek-2l i eh esa i Thus Cee ead (i ba) i(k cae eat) Ek a k ay 0 ae lh > ein ee TA c= a Dea a (5 where 7, and 7, are the roots of the quadratic 7 — iy —7 = 0. (6) a 54. Theorem. Zhe quantic (k—-1)/2 i af : AG ajae+ oP EID 20+ 1) aera where k is any odd integer® not divisible by p, and a any mark except} zero of the GF'[ p"), is suitable to represent a substitution on its p” marks, if and only ego: be be relatively prime to k. * kis ast necessarily prime. ‘The proof in § 52 that 0, .(&, @) is the on ly quantic w Ay ‘the range of suitability p" = km-+ 2, +3,...-+ (k — 2) requires that & be a prime number. +See § 18. ) Oia Sager it Ae (4) 92 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. We are to prove that under the named restrictions 0.8, a) = 8 (7) has a solution € in the G/’[ p”], § being an arbitrary mark of that field. Now by the transformation Coal : Hone Aee a. / Sa hart (6) the quantic is given the form ee la ; Coie a (5’) Thus equation (7) becomes 77* — Byk — at = 0. (7) Substituting Y = 7, this becomes Y?— BY +4 (—af¥=0, which belongs to the G/'[ p"] and is for every § resolvable in the G/’'[ p*”"] but not in the GF'[ p"). Call its roots Y and Y. _Now the equation pn Ve is solvable in the G/F'[ pp], Y being an arbitrary mark of that field, if and only if p’” — 1 be relatively prime to 4. Then if 7 be a mark of the G/’'[ p*"| satisfying (7), we must prove that falls into the lower field G/’'[ p"]. Since Y and ¥ are conjugate marks with respect to the G/'[ p"] whose product is (— a)*, we have = — 4. Hence f= 9 —a/gaygt+a=F so that indeed* € belongs to the G/'[ p"]. 55. The algebraic roots of (7) are pene ge” (iON Lea ey where ots h ila/2 el Gaara : * Moore, 1. ChsipLs 7 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 93 and ¢ is a primitive “th root of unity. This is a straight generalization of Cardan’s formula for the roots of the cubic and also of Vallés’ solution of the quintic* a , at Pa). m we Oa? = 5 It is evident that the algebraic solution of (7) for a and arbitrary is equivalent to the extraction of the Ath root of an arbitrary complex quantity and hence equivalent to the partitioning of an arbitrary angle into /# equal parts. 56. The study of the quantic ¢, (€, a, a,) derived as in § 52, or conjec- turally (when a, + 0) as in § 53, is made here only for the case a4, = 0. It is to be expected that, for a, + 0, it is a substitution quantic at least for certain special values of &, p, n, a4, and a, Thus if & = 5, p = 7, we find oo oe = Gas “ts BOy Ss which by § 30 includes the three types of quintics suitable on 7 letters, as well as the one suitable on 7” letters, » being odd. Section III.— Degree a Power of p. Quantics with all exponents powers of p, $$ 57-59. 57. Theorem.t The reduced quantic m & : ¥ (x ) = D: A,X a Re it belonging to the G/’[ p’"], will represent a substitution on its p”” marks if and only if 7(X) = 0 EL} has no root in the GF'[ p””] other than XY = 0. For it will be a substitution quantic if and only if it be impossible to find two different marks A, and X, of the G/'[ p””] such that 1(X,) = 1 (44) Veet 0. or Corollary. A?" — AA” represents a substitution on p”” letters if and only if A = O or A isa not (p — p") power in the Cie. *M. F. Valles, Formes imaginaires en Algebre, Vol. i pp. 90-92, 1869, + I reached this result independently. Cf. Mathieu, 1. c. Vol. 6, 1861, p. 275 ; also Betti, 1. ¢. Vol. 3, p. 74, 1852. For the connection with linear substitutions see Part II, Section III. 94 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 58. Since every mark except Y = 0 of the G/'[ p”"] satisfies the equa- tion Xr eee (2) it follows from § 57 that y(X) will represent a substitution on p”” letters if and only if the resultant of (2) and (1) is different from zero. This resultant is A 1 ? A 2 ’ ae A m ¥ AD See oA UP os A ae ee eee (3) nim—)) nim—I1) n(m—1) a in ’ A ‘ ’ ae) A ain —1) The proof is analogous to Sylvester’s dialytic method. I set up m equa- tions linear and homogeneous in the m quantities >) n(m—i) ° ae —1, (Zens A tae?) such that the system of 7 equations is equivalent to the system (1) and (2). Thus, raising 7 (X ) to the p™ power, si A ~ DC kant! = 0 . i=l Applying (2) multiplied by X to the first / terms, Ft ica pa > yrk—i) \" pak Yrpnntk—i) _ A i a + ad A 2 oA — 0 . ii] : i=kh+1 4 Introducing in each a new summation index, at m—k E \' pk i 7 ym—J) v prk } x pnim—)) J ~ Pek ste om Xx +- a OL jtk va —— 0 ’ j=m—k+1 j=1 Combining and replacing the index 7 by 7, v k 7 mWn—1) = Oe Rails Gey Ged Ue (4) = where, if 7 + 4 > m, we are to understand , A isp — Agia, : DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 95 Dividing out. X from (4) we obtain for & = 0,1, 2,..., m — 1a system of m equations equivalent to the system (1) and (2), since from the former we can pass back to the latter. 59. Owing to the objection that may be made against the usual proof of Sylvester’s dialytic method of elimination, the following proof that (3) is the resultant of (1) and (2) is given. Lemma.* The necessary and sufficient condition that m marks 2, %,..., 2, of the GF[p””"] shall be linearly independent with respect to the GF'| p"| is that the determinant O O ( oF es ae ees, QQ pn QQ p” Qp AoE peed, ad eegige rae ee QO p» QO p> Op —!| Qpr | 7 5 Coy > Ih | ) Ct Gs of ts ea | ee bly \9 () —— 0, hi LE) Le —— 1) (5) O pran—1) O prm—1) O prm—1) — 0 9 -_— 1 eT el BAe _— m—tl shall + 0. It is sufficient; for if 2, 2, ..., 2,_, be linearly dependent in the GF’ [ p"),i. e. if a relation : peepee (6) holds where 7, 7, ---; 7m—1 are marks of the GF'[ p"] not all zero, then will the determinant (5) vanish. It is necessary ; for if (5) be zero, write m—1 = 9 > j ee Repairs Syd eR! Cea OF ee i) iO where /? is a primitive root of the G/’[ p””"] and the y,;s are marks of the ie Gio [pela Len Co enon. ble is (ig == 0, 1. me — 1) *A more general theorem is given by E. H. Moore, A two-fold generalization of Fermat's theorem, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, second series, Vol. 2, April, 1896. 96 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. where, writing in full the determinant in /?, we have* ager ul Re fer Sie ; fr : ¥ pe PR? Re pwn) = || CPs — Wrap) b] | oe eee ‘ Sot aU, le ee eS eS t es face aks ne Roeper) which ¢ 0, # being a primitive root in the G/’'[ p™”"]. Hence | »,,| = 0, so that a linear relation (6) exists, in which not every 7; is zero, or 2, 2,,, are linearly dependent in the GF'[ p"]. The condition on A,, Az, i254, that ta Ip pe) a ee A" > ymin—i) aN Mies i A,A (8) shall represent a substitution on p”” letters is the same as the condition under which 7 Ay,..., 4,’ shall be linearly independent with respect to the Gi[p")|, when it is given that 4), X,,..., X,, are similarly independent. By our lemma, the latter condition is | AG S25 (597 == 0, 18 oe 5 Me 1) Applying (8) this determinant becomes >) nim— 1) > n(m—?2) r > ,n(m—1) r Aix? ys A,X? +- eee + ASA eae JA iA? -+- aie at + BAe ny n pprum—i n Vpn an a ? AY Xx, ee A PN OS ee SA A es ee ee eee Db m7 Ae Yom = a omy, 1 etd YPN Aap Nae eee m m ML which equals the product of determinant (3) of § 58 by yar % 7 »ynm—)) Me prm—l) er 2 > ee ey m 1 3 ” “pr ym—2) Ad Aue _9 yee 2) y pas 2) 41) ’ “12 ’ PL m CEE TP GIT PG ats ee * Baltzer, Determinanten, p. 85. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION U7 But by (5) this ¢ 0, Ay, ..., 4, being supposed linearly independent in the Cel pg" |: OF SUBSTITUTIONS. General theorems on SQ [ p”; p"], $$ 60-68. 60. In studying the quantic belonging to the G/’[ p”], jie aa Epr—k iL (e = = Oy? re Bigs? =F og ee = i DyyAS 5) in which «, + 0, and & < p” — 1 it is found desirable to compute the power ite = hire +. re = Any. =I Di) =| hs where ¢ is the least positive residue of x modulo 7 and 4 < p’*’. Let the general term of the expansion be (EP"\%o . (4,6? *)% : (ayer en ; Cpe) leat where we thus have © PO Ga +. + Oy y= pp’ + kp s+... th, (1) 9= pa, + (p'— hk) a + (p" — & — 1) Gey +... + Ayr = p" - —1. (2) I shall use the abbreviations & = pay + (p" — &) ty + Ops + Apyg +--+ Opa S5= pty + (p" — Bae + (PP — 1) (ten + deg + + ys) 61. By equation (2) dy = ( p” es 1)/p" = poe ; Hence by an application of § 14 to (1), Be gD ily sea ee el dae eee ea Np Suppose at first Ny = k : yale = if ; ee ! : where tee) town ott ire ee ts ee Ee oh hy. Then by (1) Gy = Opa pe se A Ope = pO If a, = p”" + y, where 0 < y < 2, we readily find 8, =p” + kp + kp +... + Ap’ —(p"— let (p’—k—ly Sp t+ kph? +...+ hp" —pe>p —1. Hence s 5 > 8 > p” — 1, contrary to (2). 98 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. lf a, = y, then 8 = (p—YDp rth. pr t+kp’4+...+hp—(k+1)e+y. Hence s < s, << p" — 1. Applying § 14, we conclude that a < Ap" *’ and thus a =< (kK—1)p*" + kp? * +... +k. prt +h. 62. We may prove by induction the theorem a Z(k—V (wee ee Thus, to make the general step, suppose by =k 1) Ce ae ee | so ea ay Onegai acim y Meth BI) <2 where 0 2S a! = ke ( Cae. + yp cs 2 a eae — pido ae A ‘ Then ; Ly, + nay + ieee a Gard — oad a8 Daan + “aie —- y Lee § a. a ‘ Ife, =p? tp 4p” sy, 0 a ee then By OP cee pe a DO a MT ee Hence s Ss, > p"— 1. If a, —. (is | yma ms et a Daan | Ys oe = 7 al + ki Cp ees + Pe ee + yaaa + hp” ee (hk + 1) a’ ae y ‘ Hence s = s, < p”® — 1. If a, have a value less than that last supposed, much more will s be < p" —1. Hence a, <(k al} (gr Eg pe ) Eee Hence finally, ay (k—1) (po 4 2 pe he eee eee 63. Let g denote a positive integer and write dy (bh L) O™ y aiit) ea (3) Here g is not a multiple of p, since then would also @, + a4; +... + G1 and by § 14 s would likewise be a multiple of p. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 99 From (1), (2) and (3) we readily find Op Oya oe or ApS Pe pn eet pag (4) (p —kh)a, + (p" —k Vga t+... + a4 =p" —1 — pra, ee eee aa Pt ee (ep + gh) 1 « * (5) Multiplying (4) by p” — & and subtracting (5), Ops + 2dgre + BQy43 +... (p" —k— 1)a,_, =p" (A — kp) — kg +1. (6) Thus g 1 when the equality sign holds. For by (8), Ay, Say # pani “f- youre’ a ay und: and hence by (4), ay ey a8 gosta? ae x See ae go - i} : Then 3; = pe oad 1) Cpe + | et + ts a atl ot hp” — kh =e ee Co Ss k — 1) ; Hence 8 = fe 1. * H(«) denotes the greatest integer in @. 100 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 65. Theorem. Jf ¢ = 0,i.e. n be a multiple of r, the coefficient a, = For p" = 2, € + 4 is suitable on 2” letters (by § 57) if and only if it vanishes only when ¢ = 0i.e. if a4, = 0. For p’ > 2, consider the power aD ae =e pi a me ae p ae ik ; Making 4 = £ = 1, ¢t = 0, we have g = 1 and hence @= 0) aS Pp" 7 |] ea DO Le Og The condition is thus Par see fp ti ==) } 66. Theorem. Jf the quantic belonging to the GF [ p"\, p > 2, 7 . — “ " = . © . is opr || £( pr—1)/2 &( pr—3)/2 je g ft Dayr4 $ -+ Qe pr+3)Q -- Shane -j- Oyr3S be suitable on p” letters, then Gran = 9. Consider the power ; ret ne a . jie + 1Y eh Gy cease + Vb ea ar | Dae DP) f 1 , Thus ko(p st D2, p=2 eS pogo Hence by (6) and (4) Qisy = Oyyy Se Ope ee Og a ee The condition is thus a,“ = 0. 67. Less frequently will be studied the power g ube Al kh es au aan =} Ly: — pe a h : where g and £ are < p" andi < p"*’. Similarly as in $$ 61 and 62 we may prove that Og <9 TO Oe at ia Taking s = ¢ (p” — 1), we find as in § 63, p= (g TD) BOL) ea hat ae) ty ee Oks, + 2p, + 8Gny3 +... + (p" —k—1)a,_, =p" (h— kp’) —ko + 9, where g > 0, g + 0 (mod p). DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 101 The parts of the condition given by s=n(p"—l), n 1. The remaining value g = » gives in equation (6) of § 63, AG ees es ced OL? gee LY Then by (4) a = 2? 4+ Qr4*4...4+3 42. The condition is thus o9n—2 93 Oe +5242 42 gn a), Hence would 4, = 0. But ¢ + a,é vanishes for =a,. Hence a, ¢ 0 leads to no substitution quantic. 102 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. Our quantic thus becomes >: “f- nS = CRS which is suitable on 2” letters if and only if a determinant of the form (3) in § 58 is + 0. dene at oe Cases depending on which is the first coefficient + 0. (ayan: Suitable on 5” letters by § 18. (b) & + af, a, + 0. Suitable by corollary to § 57 if — a, is a not fourth power in the GF'[5"}. (c) & + a€* + a,§, a, + 0. Rejected by § 66. (d) & 4+ 46° + af, a, ¢ 0. The coefficient of ¢? has been removed by a linear transformation. The lowest power giving a condition is fet 2 bt 2 een Thus g = 2or8=# | 5-), since g > 1 by § 64. J For 9, = 2,0, 1p0,.= 5°70" = eer for. g== 3,00 eas The condition is thus (using § 15) Qn-2 31 ae +e F541 pee» Qn—2 ge te F548 3%) or - 4, > 40,7 - The quintic is thus ¢ (€’ — 2a,)*, which is indeed suitable on the 5” marks of the G/’[5"], if 2a, be a not-square in the field. For if, when 7 ¢ g, 7 (7 — 2a,)’ = ¢ (¢? — 2a,)" on dividing out 7 — 9g, (7—¢) + a(7 + 4¢ + @) + 4a2 = 0. Substituting ZA Sf, CSL — Bs (w — 2a,)? = 24,7? . (e) The case a, + 0 is rejected by § 65. yb Py se DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 103 (a) € is suitable on 7” letters. (b) 67 + a,€. Suitable if — a, is a not-sixth power in the G/’[7"]. (oye ae a £0. Consider the power My -- ae — 2, : 71 + A(T*? + 7n—3 ap set 28 7) = 5 ; If 7a, + 2a, = 2(7" — 1), then we find Fo aa ey (aoe Ry fare 0 a contrary to the method of partition required by § 14. If 7a, + 2a, = 7” — 1, we find ee ONT ee TOs a ee OOP OTP 87 4 8. Hence a, = 0. or or (d) & + 4,8 + 4,8 + a,€. Rejected by § 66. (e) & +. 4,€* + 4,67 + af, a, + 0. For the power 7" + 3 (777? + 77% 4+ ...4+ 7) + 4,9 = 2 giving “n—l by ae aCe ha 2 a; = 0, or a; = 0 A For the power 7"? + 3(7"? + ...+ 7) + 5,g =3, 4, or 5, giving ee er (mA ae TES (fae ae AE (31)"2. 5! Ae ae oie 6 Oe Coes ? = 0, ? Qn on—2 3) ae Qn-2 5 5! ) (lie oo ace (4, —- 2a") = 0 ; The only possible form is thus & (&° — 3a,)’. () 4 af 4 of + af + af, #0. The power 777! + 2.7%? + 2.7"% + ...+ 2.7 + 3 requires 9 - —1 719 -n—I = ‘ ~n—1 - 2r 3tf{4 eee arta lai pe mee af Ser eee tls Meaney == () Oga, + a2 + 2a,0, = 0. (1) The power 7°71? 4 2.7"? 4+ 2.7" % + ...4 2.7 + 4 requires ‘ 7ni—l - ¢ ¢ ¢ * 5 Qn Alat t- Masta? + aa,+4 aa? +440} = 0. , 104 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. (Disgaea re [s : fo : ; so that by the partition requirements we have J L from (4) § 63 that g = / or 4.) Applying (1), either a, = 0 or else O20; = — Ont, (802 + 5a, (2) vo and thus — a,4, would be a square in the G/'[7"]. Consider the power 2.7" + 2.7"*% + ...42.7+4 2. For s = 2(7" — 1), we apply $67 for ¢ = 4 =k 2 oe ence 9g 1, 4, Sa, 6, =", 0) Soa ee eee > - fe . wN—1 ‘ The coefficient of 2 (7 — 1) is this 2%," > For s = 7" — 1, we have 4t+ata+a+a=2(M1+...4+7+41) Ta + 5a, + 3a,+ 2a, +4a,=6(714+...4+741))=7"—-1. Hence 4a, + 2a, — a, — 2a,= 0. Using the notation iat SES hae oN tl (S="0, 2, 45: 6) we know by § 14 that each ¢” is 0, 1, or 2 such that 10 (2) 4 5 ee. reehe Cp” se 6 bee el oh Cia (gree Oe ett |) We have immediately 46 + 26° — 6, — 2¢,° = Tm m being an integer. But m must be zero. By induction, 46 + 22 — of == Deh == 0 2 tg OF ae) Then c® = 0 or2. Butifc® = 2,c = ¢® = ¢® = 0 and the last equa- tion is not satisfied. Finally, ¢ = 0.. Hence @, = a4, =—0 and a, = q,. Then 2a, + & = 2784 4-7. ot from which it follows that a, takes exactly the 2” values nm = 5 ; Be C. f ”) . 7) jJ=0 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 105 where c;? = 0 or 1. We thus obtain 2” terms, (48°) (63) (a8) or (Ay)? ( oe) gs a ree ora Hence, as far as their literal parts, these 2” terms are identical with those ’ b] given by the expansion (24,0, + geet ge att é In order that the numerical coefficients be congruent modulo 7, we must have by § 15, Dt on Sy, (4) | Sate (6!) / j=0 > But if Z of the ¢,°’s are = 1, / of the c¢;*”s are zero and hence n —// ure = 2, Hence R=) : Le AN SS 28 5D n—1 Fe {2) n—1 2) Dee OU ae TT (Dynes OF j=0 x vi The identification is thus complete. The complete condition given by the above power is thus Raine oS + (24% + Ciiene = Ue Applying (1) and remembering that «@, + 0, = (— may oo" EE ee (3) ence (= Pie Ete (25\" i eet i so that — a,a, is a not-square in the G/’[7"]. Hence by (2) a, = 0. The power 777! + 2.7"? + 2.77% 4 ...4+ 2.7-+ 5 requires m1 n—2 2 7 ; . ae i al {24° + 4a,0,’4, + Ga;'a, + a,°a,' + 4a,'a,0,' + a,'a,'a, + 6a,°a7a,’ + 20,4,’ + 2a,'0, + @,"a,’ + 3a,'°a, + 4a,°} = 0, the last four.terms not occurring when 7 = 2. Applying (1) to eliminate «,, 4a3 + 40,70,’ + ata + 2a,°a) + 2a,8a,! + 50°F + 2a,4a, + 4a,°=—0, (4) the last two terms not occurring when n = 2. 106 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. For n = 2, we may give (4) the form 4a; Clore 2a,”) (a, — 40,”) (a, — 5a”) [4,— (1p 3) ay"| [a, — te 3) dy f= Oy But by (3) . (0,0, ) == 2a Hence «a, is a not-square in the G/’[7’] and aS 2a? . Thus (+ 2)? = 4; 44 = 2; (1 + /3)* = 5, each modulo 7. For n > 2, (4) may be written 4 (a, + 2a,”) (a — 2ufa,? + 3a,a,* + 2a,°)=0, the last factor being irreducible in the G/'[7']. By using § 68, I find that the power (et 200? fo 2a PB ST (4’) gives for zn > 2 a condition of six terms which on applying (1) to eliminate a, reduces to an identity. But the power 7"? +4 2.7"?4...4+2.7+3.7+4 requires for n > 2 -n—1 2 - 7 2 - 7 ooo x a +...47 {4a,a,°a,' =e 2a,/a, | 40,270,085 a 645) 06a, eis 5a,‘a,'a,! - 34,4, + 24," + a.a,/a"2 + 2a,'a,a,4 + a,/a,'° + 20,"a,'a, + 24,94, + 64,"*a,’ + 3a,"4a,%a,5 + 6a,."a,"} =0. Applying (1) to eliminate a, (the 4th, 6th and 14th terms cancel), a, {6a,° + aa, + 3a,"4a2 + 4a,'%a,' + 3a,%a, + 42,%) = 0, 4 a, (a4, + 64,”) (a, + 2a,”)* = 0. Hence by (4’) the only possible values, when 2 > 2, are iy i The same holds also for n = 2, since the set of values bi = i DGS 0 = is excluded by the condition, given by the 18th power, Ut, + Ba, a0,' + 5a,)a,' + 34,5474, + Lala’ + 4a) + 3a,4,'4,° + 5a,a,' -+ 3a,%a8a,! + a,'aya.° + 2a,'a,'0,' + 4a,%a,2 = 0, DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 107 which reduces to 6a," = 0 by substituting the latter set of values, is an identity for t= 20, a4,=— aS: The only possible form is thus ¢ (€’ — 2a,)*, which may be proved suitable on 7” letters, if 24, be a not-square, by the method used in § 39 or as below. NAcep cen Lh. (a) Et A aye S. Suitable if — a, be a not-tenth power in the G/’[11"]. (b) " + af, a +0. The power 3 .11"* 4+ 7(11"? + ...+ 11) + 9 requires a, = 0. (c) &" + a,§* + a, a, t 0. For the power 2. 11" + 6(11"? + ... + 11) + 8, we must have s = 11" — 1 and then a, = 6(11"7 4+ ...+11)+ 8. We may prove by induction that ape Ali 11? + 11) 8. Thus suppose a =4(11"? + 117% 4+...4 11"") + 6(11" *'+...+11) +8 —a, Oe ee FICS Olt * 4 a 11) 4 8. Then Cait ee ree 2 Lt tot aD LL te, lide elie. ed. 1" fy. where 0 = y = @, ere Le OL all) 8 Ll 10e Dy S110. Tide et Le oe BLL eH Le ty, Pe Let ere et) 6 Ie + 112) + 8.11 —10e + 24y< 11"—1. Hence ieee ere LL ee Ol Lt and thus pee ee te LIP ee OI et 1d) + 8. It is now easily shown that Gee eee Li 1) a 2 119 + ... 4 T1 8, a, = 1, as a smaller value for a, would require s < 11" — 1. The condition is thus Hiliah «2 Syne en = (Pe fe ty = 0 or a = 0. 108 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. The power 2.11" + 6(11"? +... + 11) + 10 then requires that a, = 0. (a) & $ an8! + a? + a8, @ #0. The powers 11" + 7(11"? + ...+ 11) 4+ 9, 1177? +7(11"? +...+11) + 10, and 2.11"'+ 4(11"7 + ...+ 11) + 8, require in turn, a—=0, a =9, (e) €" + a€° + ...is rejected by § 66. (f) €" + 4€ + af + a6 + a€ + af, a, + 0. The power 11"7 + 5(11"7 +... + 11) + 6 requires a, = 0. The powers 117 + 5(11"7 + ...+11) + Tand 11"1'+4 5(11"° 4+... + 11’) + 6.11 + 4 require respectively tee is =i Gee ee (4y° + 2a.) + 5a;"a,) = 0 n—1 © ip) FIG. (g” + 2ag%) + 4a,'a,) = 0. Hence a, = 0 and then a, = 0. The power 11." + 5(11"° +... +11) + 9 of &" 4+ a6 + a,§ requires n—1 qj 1+... 4141 (q,, — 3a,2)t = 0. The only possible form is thus ¢ (© — 5a,). (g) The cases a, + 0, u, + 0, a, #0 I have not attempted. 75. Theorem.* a, =, 0 by.8-60. Lf d be any divisor of p" — 1, the quantic & (E4 — y)(Pr—lyd | where vis a not dth power in the GF [| p"), represents a substitution on its p” marks. We are to show that &(é4 _ y)\(pr-Did — 8 (1) has a solution ¢ belonging to the G/’[ p"], § being an arbitrary mark of that field. The statement being evident when / = 0, we will suppose that f/ + 0. Writing ¢ = ¢* — » our quantic becomes gpd : (¢ aH y)ua = (g?” -b yor) ; It is then sufficient to prove that g + vy? = ft = 6 * From the results of §§ 70, 72, 73, and 74, for ‘Di = 3, Osa and Nal respectively, I venture the ple type (2) conjecture that all substitution quantics of degree p suitable on p” letters are reducible to the sim- E (€4 — y)(p—-0e where d is a divisor of p — 1. DICKSON, ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 109 has a solution ¢ belonging to the G/’[ p"], ¢ being any dth power and » any not dth power of the field. For if there be such a solution ¢ (which + 0, since 3 + 0), then é — (¢ + y)ua = B/gP ne will belong to the G/’[ p”| and satisfy (1). Writing in (2) ¢ — 1/o and multiplying by w”’, we obtain Lee sur Dw”. If we make r OO Lee baat ar 0 being thus a dth power and Y a not dth power in the field, the last equation becomes Go = Oa But this always has a solution in the field ; for by § 57, corollary, the quantic wo? — Yo represents a substitution on p” letters, »’ being a not ¢th power and hence a not (p” — 1)st power, d being a divisor of p” — 1. For 7 = n, this theorem is a special case of the following theorem :* 16. Tf ris prime to and < p” —1,tfsisa divisor of p" — 1, and if Ff (&) is a rational integral function of = belonging to the GF '| p"| which can never vanish, then the quantic er fe) represents a substitution on p” letters. For if the quantic be raised to the /th power, / being not divisible by s, we have a set of terms whose exponents are of the form ms + dr and thus are not divisible by s and hence not by p" — 1. But if bes isi p= 1") we get the term =”, since by the hypothesis on 7 (¢*) we have Lee) = 1. But /7 is not divisible by p" — 1. * Proved for 2 — 1 by Rogers, |]. ¢. p. 41. I give a modified proof. 110 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 77. The substitution quantics given by § 76 and, when x < 7, by § 75 are not reduced. Thus, for p > 2, we have the suitable quantic yp mE pip ta : = 5 er(& 2 — yp)? = — Df EF —1/2(v+1/) v being a not (p" — 1)/2 power in the G/’[p"] and thus any mark except +1,—1,0. For the p” — 3 values of v, we get for each value of 7, (p" — 3)/2 different substitution quantics on p” letters. For if ytlf=v4+1/V then either »y = Y ory =1/. Alsovt1/v. Examples of the above quantic : == 1,” Dp Ses0 ean i &¢+ 3¢ and €, + 2c, Hermite’s forms. at eg a Poms Lp aL ee NG ne Aeecsseao nes 2D =o oe ee ae cuLsere seas For the values » = 1, p = 7, we have if » = — l, é (62 — yp)? = — By ( — v6 +4 82%) & (E? — yp) = 2 {EE Ove 4B ue] which together give the known quantic on 7 letters, G4 gE 4 By, a = arbitrary. Srorion LV.— Degree a multiple, but not a power, of p. 78. Attempting no general investigation, I will confine myself to the deter- mination of all sertics suitable on 8” letters, together with a few special results on sextics suitable on 2” letters. g(§)=—& + af + a f* + a6 + af + a,€ on 8” letters, §§ 79-82 79. Applying a linear transformation (in the G/’[3"]), g(F + y) =F + a8 + (a, + 2a) &* + (a, + an + ay? + 27?) “(ag sk &7P) FS = (Gg a 2a 4 ag? aa) ae DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 11] Hence if a, ¢ 0, either the coefficient of €* or that of €* can be removed by choice of 7. But if 4, = 0, no other coefficient can be removed in general by a linear transformation. 80. The case a, = 0. w+ The second, fourth and fifth powers require respectively, Ss a (1) 1l+ai+aéi=0 (2) O° + 2a,a, + 4,5 + 2a3a, + 2aa,0, + a,°a, -+ 2a,a,4 + Zana; + 20,0; + 2a,aa; + aga" = 0. (3) The seventh power requires exactly the cube of (3). From (1) and (2), a, is a square ¢ 0 in the G/'[3?]. From (1) and (8), (43 + 2ay%Gs0; + O°") + 2 (Gs + GHz) (4° + Gy4;") = O. Multiplying by «,* and applying «,' = 1, (a, + G0)? {a, + 2(a, + a,a,)?} = 0. Hence either Gx ht OL 0 Oa ee The case 4, = 2a,4, is excluded below. The quantic oo a ae a6 -- a6" + (2a,a, a 2,5") € (4) becomes by writing ¢ = + a,'"7, a, = + a,Pa, ie {7 ae 7 =a a7) ae 7 = (2a a 1) y) \ ; The resultant of the equations y+t7+ (Qa+1)y7=—0;7=1 is oo t+ tol (e+ 1) (¢ —a— 1). Hence « may have any value in the G/'[8"] except 2 and 2 + 2?” 112 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. The ultimately reduced form of (4) es bape ate ees hg 1é represents the following substitutions on the marks of the G/’[3"] : (0) (1) (— 1) (212, 21 — 1, 918 +1) (— 918, _ 912 _1 _ 918 4 1) fora = 0. (0) (1) (= 1). (2, = 218 1) ol 1) ok oi ee) fore (0) (1) (— 1) (— 91) (_ 942 4.1) (— 912 1) (22, 22 4.1, 212 — 1) for a = 21, (0) (1) ‘eo 1) (Q42, ne ils 42 1, 91/2 il. 91/2°__ 1 2/2) fora =—1 + 217, (b) n > 2. Write 3" = 6m + 3, m being thus of the form 9% + 4. The powers m + 1, m + 3, and m + 4 require respectively GO, =a, (1) a, (20° + a,°) = 0 Os! + Ogt0;° + aga? + afah + 2a,°0, + a°a.” + 24,47 + a,'a,°a, + a%d,'04-+ a,7d,° + 2a,%0, + 4''=0, (2) the last two terms not occurring when 2 = 3. Applying (1) to (2), we have whether 2 = 3, Oy (Us! fF OglhgIs? + Oy°s'Us + Oy'Oy!) = Uy (U5 + Og)’ = 0. Consider the power 3"! + 387 +...43+1 7 aq+a+4,+ 4+ 4. For s — 6a, + 4a, + 3a, + 2a, + a, = 3 (8" — 1), we have Gy Se BA Se 8 Se ae a a a re ee For 6a, + 4a, + 3a, + 2a, + a, = 2 (8" — 1) = 3" 4+ 2.3"1 + 2,3" +... + 2.3 + 1, it follows that a, = 0. For, in the notation of § 73 (f), if of = 1, then of = 1, .. cf; == 1; while ah ote ewouldmives = 20.071), Also a,.— 0; fornt cP? then 2 a Thus 2a, = a, == 0, DIO, == 0, ee OF a ee For s = 3" — 1, we have at once Q, == 88) + BP ee BEAL, $a p= ee DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 113 The condition is thus n—1 - an—1 jee i Fak OtT 4 ap” fins A OtE . () Hence by (1), 4 is a square ¢ 0 in the G/’[3"]. The only possible form is thus & + gf + 46 + a2 + 2a, , which is nof suitable on 3” letters since it vanishes for ¢ = a,!? + 0. 81. The case v4, + 0. Removing the term a‘, we consider Sta?+a484 46+ 4€. (a) n = 2. The second, fourth and fifth powers require respectively, Gp 20 Ore (1) 1+ a%a, + ae, + a46=0. (2) a, + 2a, -+- 2a,%a, + 2a,?4, + 4,707 + 2a,4,%0, + 2a,aa,' + af307—=0. (3) The seventh power requires the cube of (3). First, a2 = 1. For if a4, = 0, then a, = 0 by (1) and then «a, = 0 by (8), which is contrary to (2). By squaring (2), ads’ + Qafas + a%a° = af + 2a, + 1 = 2(a, + 1) = 0,0, 1-20," ; (2 ) But a, +0; for if a, = 0, then by (3) 0° (03° 4- 2a,°0, + 2a,°a,* +- a,’a,') = 4, (a, — 4,°) (43° + 4°) = 0. If either a, = a,° or a, = 2'a,°, then by (1) a,* = 1, contrary to (2) for a.== (0! Hence by (2’) ieee Naas a a? ae Da® te Oa? 2.0), Writing a, = ya,’ this becomes, aside from the factor @,’, @+)@+)@—7-1) =0. 114 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. If 7 = — 1, a,4 = 1 by (2), while (3) becomes a, + 2af%a, + 2a,°a,° + aa,* = a,’ (a, — a°)' = 0. The resulting quantic £6 ae a2 che ape wy ose PA ape is suitable on 3° letters. Thus for a, = 1, it represents the following substi- tion on the marks of the G/’[3?] : (0) (1) (— 1) (277, — 2%?) (24? + 1, — 24 — 1, — 23? + 1, 23" 1). If 7? = — 1, a, = 21a’, while (2) and (3) become i — a (1 — 21) g,? — 2¥¢° + 2a3a, — 234,34, + a,?a,4 = 0. Multiplying by a,’, and placing a,'a,' = a, = — 1, « = ¢a,’, ‘tae Q12g8 a (1 ran 21/2) ¢? 29 al + 21/2) = 0 ’ whose roots are Lie Ota eT ero ee 1 oe But & + «4& + gas — gas? + 2%a,°€ vanishes for € = — 2'*a, when g = — 1 — 2%", while for g = 1 — 2!” or gy = — 1 + 2%? it represents a substi- tution on the marks of the G/’[3?]. Thus, taking ¢, = 1, e446 1 (4 21/2) a abe Qu2) G2 4 gre &6 as & (4 1 a 21) ra a (— il an 23) = ao yl aa represent respectively the substitutions (0) (— 1, 284 1) (1, 2 1, OR on oe ee (0) (— 1) (1, 2%? — 1, 23”) (21? + 1, — 218, — 232 4 1, — 232— 1). If 7? =7-+ 1, a, = (2'2 — 1) a’, and (2) and (3) become ees — 21g? + (1 — 2%*)a,° + 24a, + 2'a,°a,> + aa, = 0. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 115 Multiplying by a,’ and placing a,‘a,4 = a, = 1, 4, = ga; 21g Le D122 roles (212 a 1) aed) Its roots are — 1, 1 + (— 21? — 1)!”, of which the last two are not marks of the G/F’ [37] since (— 21? — 1) = — 1. The quantic given by ¢ = — 1, 6 as ae Pe (gas = ae oh (212 ~s 1) ae represents when 4, = 1 the substitution on the marks of the G/’[3"] : (0) (222) (21? — 1)( — 2'? + 1)(1, 24 4 1, — 1, — 2!", — 212 _ 1). dee eae The fifth, seventh, eighth and thirteenth powers require respectively, & + aoa, +a*=0. (1) a,0° + af + aa? + a70,%0, = 0. (2) Osby | 2apas + 0°05? 4- 4,0,°0, 4- 20,°a, + o,'a,0,° + 2a,°a,'a," + G70. + 24,0,’ = 0. (3) I + afajfa, + aa + aafa,7 + a2 = 0. (4) The tenth power gives an identity ; the eleventh requires exactly the 9th | power of (2). Applying (1) to (2) a, (a> + 24,843 + a,"o,) = 0 or pe 0, dy a 2a. (5) (b,) If a, = 0, then a, = 0, a4, = — a,‘ and the sextic obtained, & + a,&° — 4,'§ is suitable on the mark of the G/’[38*]. Thus &° + & — & represents the substitution OM (-Y)GP-L—F+7-L—-P+I4+LI-LP+4—7 —f-Ujt+he—j,—P-J-1L—P-J4+N(-h-F +3, 2 2 | ee a ae Pa tL Pe 7 LL, ume geririels J == 1). where 7? = j + 1 is the irreducible equation defining the G/’ [3°]. 116 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. (b,) If a, + 0, we have on applying (1) and (5) to (3), a,°a, (24,5 + 2a,? + a,°a,? + a,'a,") = 0. Writing «, = 72,°, this becomes vi 7 i 1 — O : Multiply by 7’, replace 7" by 7" +” and 7” by 1: je te pects Awe Extracting the ninth root, ae ape Fa ee 2 fant eae apd 4 — i ee Mel Meme Remcttergl pam UE oe 98 Oi iy hha Now 7 = 1 is excluded since € + a,¢° + a,°¢° + a,'€? vanishes for § = Again 7” + — I, since then 7* = — 1. If7v=7 +7 +1, then 7? = — 7 + 7,7" = 1. From (1) and (5) Oy == 90, 0, = — (4 + Ta a, ey ee Substituting these values in (4), using 7° = 1, we have 12 7 7° FP a a ats ae which is readily seen to be inconsistent with Siecle hor ce he (c) 2 > 3. Write 3” = 6m + 3. The powers m + 1 and m + 2 require respectively, a, + a0, + a = 0 aa° + af + afa? + afa,'a; + a,"a, 24,7’ 0- From these a (5° + 2a°a,° + a") = 0 or O, = 0,74, + 2a,°. But oS G6 a5 Oar) f° + (4,"a, + 2a,°)¢ vanishes for € = — g, and is thus excluded. — O,. 82. Summary of $$ 79-81. The only reduced SQ [6; 3”] are the last five quantics in the table § 87. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 117 Introductory study of sextics on 2” letters, $§ 83. 83. Ifig(@)=& +46 4+ «€f + 4,6 + a? + a6, then ¢g (¢ + 4) = Sa Cer e a9 + 4) Ss gs b ee sy + 44) oh + (ayy + 457? + 45) & + (7) Hence in general no term can be removed. If a, = 0 we can make the coeffi- cient of €' zero; if 4, = 0, we can make that of € zero. 84. The case n even. Then 2" — 6m + 4. (a) n = 4. Of the “ power conditions,” two are independent, err, 3 tly ac aos + af + a, + ata, + asa? + a,° + afafa, + afaa,? + a%a." + afa, + 0370s! + G's) + O,°O,U, + asd; + aaa, + aao—0. (b) n > 4. The power 7 + 1 requires a, = «,°. Applying this to the condition given by the power m + 5: ads + OG, + afayas + aafa + 4,450; + 4,°o,'a,' + a°a'a, + 4,4, + a Mata, + afa$ + afafa?2 + 4” + a@afa2 + aa? + a'a8 + aja =0. By the method of proof used in (f) § 73, we find the power 2m +1= 274 Or44 ...4+RP 41 requires ee ee eae UOT Ot. 0% 85. The case n odd. Then 2” = 6m + 2. (a) zn = 3. The third power requires a, + a7 + a%a, + aa? + a,’a, + aa7 =0. (13) The fifth power requires exactly the 4th power of this. (b) » > 3. The power m + 2 requires ads + sae + aa, + a,'u, + a°a, + aa, + a,'a70, + a 3a =0. (15) The power m + 6 requires for rn > 5 and n = 5 respectively (Og AO) (G, Ga” id,” ag) (43° Pa) (Qa, O02 4 a,fo,)—0. (2) a, + a” + aa, + af (a, + a3) + a,° (a,0, + aaf + a,’a,)—0. (2;) The powers m + 8 and m + 18 lead to (1). (b,) Suppose a, = 0, so that by § 83 we can take a, = 0. If a, + 0 and n > 5, then by (1) and (2) we find a, = a, = 0. 118 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. But & + a,€° vanishes for § = a,'%; while every mark in the G/’([2”"], n odd, is a cube by § 18. If a, + 0, and n = 5, (1) and (2,) give 7h tle . = 5, 4 Dai Tomes (0 Py lid 34 ren 0 a Thusteither, a,’ Ss" a,%== Orca te Oe ee a =6 £3 222 le} is S 1 as, ol, eee iS} But & + a6 + a,”6 + a,"¢ vanishes for § = a,” = a, If a, = 0, then the power 2m + 1 = 27 4+ 2744...42?4 241 requires 4, = 0. But & + a;€ vanishes for € = a;'", a mark of the G/'[2 ], n odd. Hence every suitable sextic on 2” letters, 2 odd and 738, in which the coefficient of € is zero, is reducible to the form €°. , (b,) Suppose a, = 0,4,+0. Then we may take a, =—0. Then a, = 0 by (1). Bor 7 > bare 0 by (2h: for enone, elves a, + 4°a" = 0, hence either a, — 0 ora, = a;. But & + a€ vanishes for 2 = «, and is excluded. The sextic & + a,¢° + a, repr aa a substitution on the marks of the Galt [2 viz tor aie ls (URGORG TORN ce hm pncwy =o biyhiae UR ae Rypiccs) cath oct bat ie sok vase om OLGA cr cee hal sai tea eh PEPADE ED GT Ey Le eye a PEP PIS LI ITA LRT Bee ee ee FI LG oF es Fo) ee the G/’[2°] being defined by the equation 7? = 7? + 1. (b,) Suppose a, = a, +0. Then by (1) On'=. a> + afd, 10,6, (2) and (2;) and (1;) are seen to be satisfied ; but OP OS a Ge GR (Gy a Oy ea vanishes for § = 4. 86. Summary of §§ 83-85. If a sextic represent a substitution on the marks of the G/’[2”"], then, for n even, Us =O, ob 0s for n odd and > 3, at Oat A) at ae except for the suitable quantics e° on 2” -létters eS" oe” oe Ont a letbers: DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 119 87. Table.* Except for sextics on 2” letters, the following is a complete list of all reduced quantics o (€) of degree = 6 which are suitable to represent substitu- tions on a power of a prime number of letters. From them (by § 16) all suitable quantics whatsoever of degree = 6 are obtained by the formula ap(§ + f)+7. Reduced quantic. Suitable for p” = E any = 2” c ; 3”, 3m + 2 — g& (a = not-square) : ; 3” fi BE. : ; : 7 cA on ot + Og” + TS . ; z 4 F (when it vanishes oul fOr Go BE Gy ge é : : ; 5", 5m + 2, 5m + 4 & —a§ (a= not 4th power) . , 5" gF Bite ; 3? Cceeedcoo, ; ; 7 eo teas? eS? aE 3a7E anes a Late Seranral f ; : 7 567 + 50? + oS (a = arbitrary). ; 5m + 2 & + a& + 30°F (a = not-square) . : : 13 oS UN LAE Ei a eiies = not-square) . ; 5? eo : ; 4 . ; ; ; 2”, n odd. Ves 2 ; : ; 11 G+ w+ ag? + 5E (a = square) 11 + 40765 + af? + 45 (a = 0 or not-square) . “ Et 6° + a €* + ao? + a,7& + (2a a, + 0,5!) € : ; on (a, = square +0; a, = 0, + 2¥%¢8?, + a3?) or + 2)? + 1) 2,37, the signs to correspond to that of + a,°”). & + a& — of (4 = arbitrary) : ; ; ; aha Ge ae a oe eae (a =—arbitrary):. : 3° 4+ af + oa — pats? + 212a€ (4 = arbitrary) . 3” (where g = + (1 — 2")). f+ af — ofS? + aff + (212 — 1) a°F (a = arbitrary) 3° In this table 21? occurs always as a symbol for ezther of the two marks of the G/’ [37] satisfying the equation 2? — 2 = 0. 88. Theorem. Ad/ substitutions on T letters may be derived from the two C= ae 3b: we = 2. [a | [a ) {2 An a ie 1 Le +5) Lat + BF) [Bota 4 208) = Lab — Bat + deat 4 Bbw) ce Compare coe tcan Journal of Mathematics, vol. 18, p. 218, § 19. 120 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. so that we reach the form e+ ae+a?+ 3a°x, aw = quadratic non-residue of 7. pa ped ete vy ) La — b>} ba®J le He -- b8a:7 + 3d*z J | Bote | 3 J te i = La? — bt at 3022 | a) so that by writing 6 = c’ we reach the form x — Can + 8cta. [wc | [ w ae fee 2 | 3 Lae) Cae —b49% + i, Lave J La? + 2072? ++ 3 (20?)Pa J * ko] Hence by (1) and (2) we reach the form e + ae + 8e7x, a = arbitrary. : (x 1 fa Ta [ @ ) |; @) | | w [x La + 30°} La? +b) 1a? — be? + bo? + Sha) Lb’e. Ob? | =i + 46%x ee) so that we reach a* + 32. [ # 7} (21 fw er eee % 5 Aba is La® + Qe J? (5) La?) Lat + 40%) so that we reach a + 2z. 89. E. Betti proved (1. c. vol. 2, pp. 17-19, 1851) that all substitutions on 5 letters are derivable from e = an + b> 7 = ws 90. Enumerative proof of Wilson’s theorem. Of the p! literal substitutions on a prime number p of letters, p (p — 1) have a linear representation az+6, a0. The remaining ones are represented by quantics of degree > 1 which fall into sets of p’ (p — 1) each, viz, ag(« + b)+e, a +0, 6 and ¢ arbitrary. Hence p! — p( p —1)isa multiple of p’ 2 — 1), so that (p — 1)! + 1 is divisible by p. Enp oF Part I. THE ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS ON A POWER OF A PRIME NUMBER OF LETTERS WITH A DIS- CUSSION OF THE LINEAR GROUP. [ CONTINUED. | By Dr. Leonarp Evucrne Dickson, Chicago, Ill. PART IJ.—LrygEar Grovprs. Section L.—Linear Homogeneous Group. 1. We may define p”” letters le. £., EIN, Em characterized by m indices, each being an arbitrary mark of the Galois field of order p"”. The general linear homogeneous substitution A on these letters replaces /; .. t, DY 4z,,..., ems Where v joa Sg o¢ =. J Ay; OR ee af) a Il has ANY — where the a,’s are marks of the G/’[ p"]. But (1) will indeed be a substitu- tion on the p”” letters if and only if the determinant |} A {=|a,;| 40. Cerveaen ly 2, ert 7e) For there must be one and only one system of m indices ¢, which (1) replaces by a given system &’; and hence an unique set of values ¢; satisfying the equa- tions ke POT em ee (hee ee 970) ga) Remark. If the substitution (1) be identical with m ote sy (i ses, nv) il then must Op Ops Cee WOR Pobre eri §) This follows if we take in turn, for 7 = 1, 2,...m, the particular set of values é=1;6=0. ES RO eee 8 122 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 2. Let & denote a second linear homogeneous substitution = S iS i (7 se eae ner a) ad) so that |B) =} 8, £0- The result of applying first the literal substitution ey ien Meee ey and afterwards the literal substitution A= (ls, | == (le, | Pehla Wisk: where by (1) 55 = & Aye, is the same as applying the single substitution bee BA=| |, &", where érr oe = OS FS V foot | if Tik = ~ OB - ” =I] We may think of this compounding of two substitutions analytically. Laying aside the method of composition by matrices,* it will be found con- venient here to think of the composition as follows. The result of applying the analytic substitution A first and 6 afterwards is denoted by BA. A replaces the index &; by s Gish 4 » j= *Tn the matrix notation the substitution (1) is denoted by (a). The composition formula is then da , (4°) = (4 ij) (4%) ™m where vs te y , a nS = 4x y je ja provided the matrix (4,,) operates first. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 123 which in turn B replaces by eka et ee < 4; [ = BaF | = 2 Vik? k » j=) =i — if m ss }. lik = <= Bix emt | The compound /A is indeed a substitution since | BA |=l\ral=lay!-| &el=lF St hea ea Vie Moreover the 7,,'8 are marks of the G/’'[ p"}. ; cae The literal substitution product LA is thus the same as the analytic Ppp! substitution compound BA. The transformed of 7’ by S is always CA! Foes iS pass For literal substitutions, S~' operates first; while for analytic substitutions, S operates first. The result is the same in both cases. ~It follows from the composition that the totality of linear homogeneous substitutions (1) forms a group, which is called the linear homogeneous group of degree p™. It is a generalization of Jordan’s linear homogeneous group* of degree p” in which the m indices and m? coefficients are integral marks, i. e. marks of the G/’[ p']. It is however contained in the Jordan group on mn indices. It is identicalt with the group investigated by E. Betti in 1852-1855 and in more detail by E. Mathieu in 1861. 3. Necessarily the group I study is of degree a power of a prime. But all that is of essential interest in Jordan’s general linear homogeneous group of degree g” centers in the case when g is a prime. Thus by Jordan, l. ¢. Arts. 127-131, the factors of composition of the linear group on m indices modulo g are simply the factors of composition of the groups on m indices taken respectively modulo p/* where qT De, t=1 Di Px» +++, Pr being the different prime factors of g. While by Arts. 132-134, the factors of composition of the group modulo p/‘ are those of the group modulo p; together with factors all equal to p;. Hence for the study of non- cyclic simple linear groups the case of a composite modulus offers nothing beyond that of a prime modulus. * Jordan, T’raité des Substitutions, pp. 91-110, 1870. +See Section III; also literature given in Preface. 124 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 4. Theorem.* The order 2(m, n, p) of the linear homogeneous group of degree p"” on m indices is Ouse Lae 1) Ges. PF. p”) Giese A oat » pr) 5 ir (ae ae. 2) 2 Let V be the number of linear substitutions fi, = 1, Is fee CO) Ley, which leave the index ¢, invariable, and let 7’ be a substitution which replaces it by eee _ Dy 555 . j=) T TR, TR, ..., TRe, The JY substitutions will replace ¢, by this same linear function, and no other substitution has this property ; for if (/ were such a one, 7’! UW would leave €, invariable and hence be a certain /2,, so that Ue Tie The marks «,, may be taken arbitrary except that not all can be zero. Hence the system a, is susceptible of p”" — 1 different sets of values. To each set correspond JV substitutions. Hence 2im, 2,9) = (pw — 1). But the substitutions 7, are of the form ™m Sa Set le a (PeS2 ia. 5 72) Yok where the m — 1 coefficients a, are arbitrary and the coefticients a, a3, ..., Aim are such that their determinant is ¢ 0, which can happen in 2 (m — 1, n, p) ways. Hence LV == PDO (ie ne) a Thus 2(m, n, p) = pe (pm — 1) 2(m — 1, n, p) — poo (ps ett 1) ; pe Ge: i 1) pick (p” — 1) a Cee — 1) ie — p”) es Ga = oe) J since evidently for a single index, #2 (1, 2, p) =p" — 1. * Stated Jordan, 1. c. Art. 169; proof for mn = 1, Art. 123. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 125 5. Transformation of indices. Let A be the linear homogeneous substi- tution on p”” letters : ™m Fee (re Lean a ie) (1) ied We define m new quantities Aono ie ms (eaaatl eA arate oa aT k=1 where the £;,’s are marks of the G/’[ p”] such that Beata Vr0 | We may thus solve (2), a?) 4" ik A = Se ee By ates (Ihe ek a ed where £,, denotes the adjoint of 8, in || =| P|. Instead of distinguishing the letters 7; |. <,, from each other by the vari- ation of the indices ¢,, we can distinguish then by the variation of the 7,’s con- sidered as independent indices. Thus A will replace one of these new indices 4, by 22 By, a455;; So that, applying (3), we may write the substitution A kj qi Se tak (2 eee heey m) (4) where la B,, ta Py Pin Beg + Z ky j |B) The coefficients £,, may be chosen to simplify the expression of the substitu- tion A. Remark. The transformation of indices (2) leaves the determinant | a, | of the substitution A invariant. For, applying (2) to (4), a ies 2 Ya Pie SK (aa ear petie | k=1 lk Applying (1) and changing a summation index on the right, »' Bin Og & = ~* ra By § - CS ee kj l,j Since this holds for arbitrary €/s, we have [see remark § 1] = Pie Gy = ae By 5 (7 == Le 2, as m) k= ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 126 DICKSON. Hence Bi b= | pt 47 ball or | xs | == | Ta - 6. Denote by Bz, xs, the substitution re i mr ol = - = —_— Sr — Spr =F AS 53 3 = d affecting only the index &,. Its determinant is 1 if 7 # s, butis 1 + Aifr=s. Theorem. very linear homogencous substitution S can be placed under the form* BL, where B is derived from the m(m — 1) ( p” —1) substitutions Be. rte 5 (Fy os LD Rae) 1 being any mark +0 of the GF'[ p™], and where L is a substitution which leaves unchanged every index except the last which it multiplies by the deter- minant of S. Let the given substitution S be mm cf = 4 0 F (2 = 1,2, , m) i Suppose Dr¢ ¢ 0 5) O15 =0 2 If e > 1, the substitution nm ‘7. 7 T= i Bg, Gijt; j=e will replace ¢, by m™m = x" Ps y’ a2 5° = rig be eet a 4 8 Y= If ¢ = 41; the substitution 7 >== Bz, af, ° Bz,, se, Bz, yée ott Ds ee will accomplish the same result if 1+ f=, ~+a(l + fy) = 4%, which may be satisfied by any ; + 0, since a, + 0. We thus have S = 7'S,, where S, is a new substitution which leaves ¢, unchanged and thus has the form "= 6; €/ = 3B, 6,. (tien 23 eae eee 5) * The variation from Jordan, Art. 121, is due to the correction of 1. 17, p. 94, where S, 7’ should read 7'S,. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 127 DICKSON. To decompose S,, I build the substitution if = II Be v8, viz. Donna, 270) | fade fag 5 fag Ce ~ . = 915 SH a HH (2 where the 7;,’s are chosen later. Denoting by S, the substitution Yo att at =e Ph == Sis (2: SS eer on 970) dVyp L , m) we will have S, = 7'S, provided Pe Opie m c= By he = Ba : I==2 oy 778)) But the 7's can be determined so as to satisfy these equations since (2, yy = 2, oe By | =| 8,) =| S| #0. Hence Pevdome AS RASS Proceeding with S, as we did with S, etc., S = eds <6 Lees Tie Som—a ’ where S,,,,_, denotes the substitution Sete Joel At We Lee, oe A lh Oe 7. Theorem. fa linear homogeneous substitution S is commutative with all the m (m — 1) substitutions ote wiensenes heb) Bz, mel» where pis a fixed mark ¢ 0 of the GE'| p"), then S simply multiplies all the indices by the same mark. Let the substitution S be Ey (¢ =1,2,...,m) Tt a iS Susy j= We then find that S. B:, ,¢, and Lz, , . S are respectively mm , j= foal ’ ° si= 3 yé; 5 Le oe. ee ot 2-t Jc) m ee at ol o, = ae + pay) §5 5 j= ™m all 4 = \' »~ G4 SS MGS, = By; - j=l 128 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. The conditions that the two expressions for &,’ shall be identical are, since pt 0, Gy = Gee Fy =a C7 eae Ler Pe Ly The conditions that the two expressions for €/ (i + £) shall be identical are Oem (ae LA eee eee) Since the two sets of conditions are to hold for # and / = 1, 2,..., m, k+l, S must be of the form rie CRS SS re where’@, == 0,)°== vas Cane Factors of composition® of the generalized linear homogeneous group G of degree p™, §§ 8-12. 8. Let p*»—_1l1—=p,.p,... py, where p,,...p, are equal or different prime numbers. Let p be a primitive root of the equation Ep" —1 —l1=0. Denote by G,,, Gp», --. the sub-groups formed of those substitutions of G whose determinant is a power of p”, p””,..., respectively ; finally, by Gn = I that formed by the substitutions of G having determinant unity. Let d be the greatest common divisor of mand p" —1; py, erat ie the prime factors, equal or different, of d; p’ a primitive root of Sti 02 Denote by //, //,,,, H,,,»,, ... the groups formed of those substitutions of I which multiply all the indices by the same powert of p’, by the same power of p?>,..., respectively. 9. Theorem. The factors of composition of G are 2 (m, n, p) raeitt: ; Pir Por +++ Pres Ge Pris Pors++> Pi» except when (m, n, p) = (2, 1, 2) or (2, I, 3). *Some of the ideas used by Jordan in his decomposition of the linear group are to be found in a different form in the earlier work of Betti, 1. c. vol. 3, pp 79-83, 1852, and vol. 6, p. 31, 1855. The latter shows that his group of degree p” (see Section IIT) has as self-conjugate sub-group (of index 2) the group Z of substitutions of determinant a square in the GF'[ p1]; that Z has as self- conjugate sub-group of order p — 1 the group of those substitutions which multiply all the indices by the same factor 2, a primitive root of p. He proves that in the case p” = 2° or 3? all the factors of composition are prime [thus giving the exception in theorem § 9]. + If a substitution of /’ multiplies all the m indices by the mark yp, then »”™ = 1, and hence y* =1. Thus p is some power of p’. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 129 Tt is clear from § 6 that the groups Fa Gas Gia ee! aA fe iat Line lees COE: 1 have respectively the orders DGnenen). Q(m,n, Pp) 2(m, n, P) eae ee 1p) See @ ad ahs, Pr PiP2 pa) Pi PiPr and that each is a self-conjugate sub-group of the preceding. Further, the numbers p; and p,; being prime, there can be interpolated between G,, and G,.». for example, no new group which contains @,,,, and is contained in G,,- It remains therefore to prove that, aside from the two exceptional cases, His a maximal self-conjugate sub-group of /. To prove this we show that if a group J be self-conjugate under /' and yet more general than //, then J will necessarily contain all the substitutions of /° 10. Let oi B OS; CSA a) jee be a substitution S of J but not in /, which therefore does not multiply all the indices by the same factor. Then by § 7, 8 is not commutative with every B:z,,x¢. 4 being a particular mark + 0,e.g.4 = 1. To fix the ideas, suppose Sis not commutative with BL: ,<,. The substitution i ie See es Ly 1, Ae will thus not reduce to the identity. Further 7’ belongs to 7; for the trans- formed of S by Bz, ,¢, belongs to /, since Lz, ¢, has the determinant unity and thus is in /* To express the substitution Z, we note that, for 7 > 1, Bz, yz, leaves §; ay os . unchanged ; that S replaces ¢, by + 4,¢,, which B;',, replaces by i fad . e ta, 2 Oy5; — Ady, , Sh which in turn S~' replaces by ¢, — 4a,y, if g denotes the linear function by which S~! replaces €,. Thus Z’ has the form m ay Spel te ae ee ’ eels es = 2 Bess Gi, = 5; — Adin (ia eer oath) j= where it is not necessary to determine the /,,'s more closely. In this expres- sion of 7’, which is the basis of the further developments, there is no longer any trace of the ¢,-specialization in Bz, yz. 130 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 11. Let us first suppose that m > 2. (1) Suppose a, = 0 (2 = 2, 3,...,m). ‘Then #,, = 1, the determinant of 7 being 1; while f,, (7 = 2,..., m) are not all zero, since 7 is not the identity. Let us take /,, + 0, changing if necessary the previous order of the independent indices &,, €, ..., &n- To simplify Z’ we take a new system of independent indices 7,in place of the former ones ¢,, viz is (2 ==; Lae ete POET EOD ss IL he mee) Syyp os) = SVp which is permissible since the determinant of transformation is f,, +0. Then ne m ta Sn ay, af iS. i= LYN Ops fa yy =! S40 = Pie Busi + = Sys; = 7 + 4 Yj 92 ; = ‘4 ’ ald f) i _ 43 = = PSs = = Puss = 4 - j=2 4==2 AN Se akg pee ay a es ik 5 Hi ‘FZ Pe ee Cay Fae Big es AT Hence 7’ becomes simply B,,,,. But by the Remark of § 5, [ contains the substitution Z (of determinant unity) PAE ae Pitter SUL eR tn 2 eC “ie M =H 3 Gy = es Hi = 15 (2 = 3,..., m) where / is an arbitrary mark + 0 of the G7 [p"]. Hence / contains Z7'7'Z, i.e. B nine Also / contains the substitution V7, of determinant unity, am + Chad A 3d Spytita’ ps Agni ge ee “ aM ae coe (a= Sa eee et De es Dh 8 Oh, ee a oe litk k>2 2} Hence J contains /;;' B,,,,,U7;,, which gives for k = 3 the substitution BG... xn, wad for > 3 the substitution B,,,,,. Likewise 7 contains the trans- formed of these substitutions, etc., so that clearly 7 will contain all the substi- tutions hoe ae (0° = Fete ete) But by § 6, these substitutions combine with each other to give every substi- tution of /} i. e. of determinant unity. (2) If not every a, (2 = 2,3, ..., m) is zero, suppose a, +0. Take Tis Noy +++) Ym a8 independent indices where pA eee ee en ain f eine ae | Th Sie U2 as. haat, aoe eee (ire= ? sistema die) “21 the determinant of transformation being unity. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 131 The m — 2 indices 7; (i > 2) are unchanged by 7’ (of § 10); thus wi 5 GC; — 5 f= G; . je (5; sa 20,0) SAS coe hy) =< Hi ees Foy Hence the substitution 7’ takes the form a m tik eee SY Lee Aus abet, Ree SS fia ieee ee acer Tyla i eI 2), a= = where (by Remark of § 5) the determinant of 7’is tute — fen = 1. In this form of 7’ the indices 7,, 7, play the same role. (2a) Suppose 7, and 7,; (2 = 3, ..., m) are not all zero. Changing if necessary the order of 7, 7, .--, 4m, We may suppose that 7,, and 7., are not both zero. The text in Jordan (I. c. p. 108, 1°) is here incorrect, but may be modified as follows, if our linear substitutions be on four or more indices ¢ : I will contain the substitution Wheel Fe I ste. TB. N3y M4 Ns, MNa ? (~ being an arbitrary mark + 0 of the GF'[ p"]) viz I = — fT Te =e — Uw MH =. (1 =3,..., m) Suppose for definiteness that 7,, + 0, and take w,,..., w,, a8 independent indices, where Op Fi Tin 5 Og = To — Ta/ M13 Ot = Em “(1 = 8; 2) Then for the substitution 7) we find ~ , ) pe Se at ed BYE ee {= — =: hs 113 wO, + LO, , , , : om | Le ede = I == (2 — LY 3hs) — & Ditrs eo ihe On Ne WO, (2 een a) Hence 7) takes the form B,,,.,, which combined with its transformed by the substitutions of J’ will give as in (1) all the substitutions of /. 152 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. For the case of three indices,* I contains the substitutions Ti [AR em Ty viz Nis PMNS Niy KN3) ~) I = GL) OS i Sh {jit = Yip aw GT 3 eee iand3» Fa = 43- Now Z, and 7, are both of the form U: =I + O35 Yo = Yo + F235 Ys = 7 - If both Z} and 7; reduce to the identity, 7’ becomes = + 113933 Ye = M2 + Fo3%33 Is = Ns» which is of the form l/, Hence in any case we have a substitution of the form Y and not the identity. We then take ,, ,, w,, defined above as inde- pendent indices and obtain for U/ the form B,,.... (2b) Suppose hi = 7x =O. (irs ov aye) Since 7’ does not veduce to the identity, we can not have simultaneously Yr = Ye = 1, Y= Yr =O. Hence if we form 7, and 7’, above for m indices, e. g. 7 is vie Seed epee 4 (gaia) 433 7 = Yo — PY¥n93 > Hi = 73 (a eta rye eC) we see that one of the two must not be the identity and we proceed as in (2a). 12. The case m = 2. Let S be a substitution of 7 but not in /7, which therefore does not mul- tiply both indices by the same factor. Let 7, be a function of the indices §, and € which S does not multiply by a constant factor, e. g. 7, = ¢, + &; let 7, be the new function by which S replaces 7,. Since 7, and 7, are linearly independent, we may take them as new indices, when S becomes (having determinant 1) NM = hs Gy = —H + OH. ‘ Now / contains the substitution 7’ Wi 0s Ys a (a + 0) *M. Jordan was kind enough to send mea correction of the error above mentioned. His proof appears valid however only for three indices. It is given here with the usual modifications. » DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 13% Hence / will contain UV = 7 “1S7S, viz My = — 2 5 YY = — O(1 + a”) 4 — O,. (1) Suppose od ¢ 0. Then / will contain (/*, which for 2 = 1 becomes i =| 3 My = 409, + Ap. If p > 2, we can replace 7, by another index @ = Adn,. Then U/? becomes G,, 5. But /' contains the substitution V, ete se oe Thus / contains V~*0*V or Bb, _.,,. If Z denote the substitution belonging to [ CET AED p= AN, (A = any mark + 0) f will contain the substitution Z“B,, 4 or By, a24: By virtue of the property Bie APp * ie Arh aaa ae (A? + Az) > we must reach a substitution 2, ,4, where » is a not-square in the G/’[ p”), p being > 2 by hypothesis. For, if not, the totality of the (p” — 1)/2 squares in the G/'[ p"], together with the mark zero, would form not only a multipli- cative but also an additive group and therefore* a Galois field of order say p” included in the GF'[ p"]. But p’ = p, qua additive period of every mark 7 Ose Lbus res . Deby seal De, which is impossible. Having one, we reach every not-square by the formula —l i) L No, vb L oe ae ae A2vp * Thus for 0+0 and p > 2, Z will contain all the substitutions 5, ,4, and By. ung -. being an arbitrary mark + 0 ef the GF [_p"], and hence all the sub- stitutions of 1 (2) Suppose 0 = 0. (2a) If p” = 2? or if p” > 5, we can find a mark a:0 of the GF'[7"] such that a + 1 and then a mark / such that B (at — 1) = pw = any mark : 0. * Moore, l. c. § 40. 134 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. Then / contains the substitution LB U B | : N1y BN2 U » VIZ = N15 Bn2 m= + BC —1)%3 He = ts or B,. un,» Which combined with its transformed by the substitutions of J will produce J. (2b) If p" = 5, we may take as independent indices wo, = 2m, + 3 Oy = — 2p + Then S will become WO; == 20,30 == AO Thus / contains the substitution 27 BS yet SB; S Das = Devas 19 2 and hence also its cube 5, .,. (2c) For p" = 2, the linear homogeneous group on two indices has the order (27 — 1) (2? — 2) = 6. It contains a subgroup of order 3 formed of the powers of the substitution These ea + &, which represents the literal substitution (¢))) (4)4:/,)). The index of this sub- group being 2, it is self-conjugate. The factors of composition are thus 2 and 3. (2d) For p" = 3, we may prove that the (3? — 1) (3? — 3) = 48 substi- tutions of the linear homogeneous group & of degree 9 are derived from (A) Fo ae C3 Sc ee ee (B) cies Pee sy ett (C) Cee es eee (D) Cf = Sa S25) Se Se ae (E) Pee tes eS Thus for the groups {FEY {#, DEA, DOV AL, D, OC, By ED eC eeaa DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. 135 we may verjly the following generating relations : Ae We TB IK IND cee WOE. OMe PAO eee OS GD ah DC.. Dim eb bee hee be DP. Ae eee Ape) = GAN eA (1 DAs AB en Ob A. From these relations it follows at once that the above groups have for orders 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, respectively, and that each is a self-conjugate subgroup of the following. Hence the factors of composition of @ are 2, 3, 2, 2, 2. 13. Since the quotient-group* of any two consecutive groups in the series of composition of any group is a simple group, we have the result that //H is a simple group of order 2(m, n, Pp) Mi ies fen) 1) Co ws pe) a) you EEA Ea) d(p"—1) d(p” — 1) except in the cases (m, n, p) = (2, 1, 2) and (2, 1, 3). Compare section IT. Srcrion II.—Zinear Fractional Group.+ 14. In our generalized linear homogeneous group @ of degree p™” on m indices, let us class into the same system the p” — 1 letters l Men, Bega = oy bEm where the €/s are fixed but » runs through all the marks except zero of the GH { p"], or, otherwise expressed, the p” — 1 letters corresponding to the same values of the ratios ¢,/&,, (¢ = 1, 2,..., m — 1). Each substitution of G will replace the letters of any one system by letters all of some one system. We have thus (p”” — 1)/(p” — 1) systems, whose . displacements (by the substitutions of G) form a group // of degree ( p”” — 1)/ (p" —1). But there are exactly py" — 1 substitutions of G which do not dis- place any system, viz, . m Gs Lee eet) : oe Lu = any mark ¢ 0} wVy ! * Holder, Mathematische Annalen, vol. 34. + Compare Jordan, 1. c. Arts. 315-317; Betti, 1. c. vol. 3, p. 74, 1852. PM ° 136 DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. The substitutions of /7 may be exhibited thus: m nm mm” (ex, pps hone a fant 8s Ve mlat 7 ge 8M is Sy We ele es. \° bie a ae = AyjS5 . =F y5; om (et Ohne =F yjSj . j-l yt Fil , es Cae can The order of //, being the total number 2(m, n, p) of the substitutions in G divided by the number of those leaving the systems invariant, is thus Q(m, n, p)/(p” — 1). 15. The linear fractional group // is clearly meriedrically isomorphie with the linear homogeneous group G. To the subgroup G” formed of those sub- stitutions of G whose determinant is unity there corresponds a subgroup /T7’ formed of those substitutions of /7 whose determinant is unity, or, as is equiv- alent, whose determinant is any th power in the G/’[ p"]. For the substi- tutions of /7 remain unchanged by multiplying the m homogeneous indices by the same mark yv, which multiplies the determinant by yp”. Let d be the greatest common divisor of m and p" — 1. Then* the proportion of marks (excluding zero) of the G/’[ p"|] which are mth powers is 1:d. Hence the order of 7’ is 2(m, n, p)/d (p” — 1). Now,t the maximal self-conjugate subgroup of G" is, for (sn, n, p) ¢ (2, 1, 2) or (2, 1, 3), the group of substitutions which multiplies every index by the same mark. The subgroup of 7’ isomorphic with it is evidently 1. Hence the group //7’ of the linear fractional substitutions on mm — 1 indices having determinant unity (or any mth power) is a stmple group of degree (p"" — 1)/ (p" — 1) and order 2 (m, n, p)/d (p” — 1), with the two exceptions (m, n, p) = (2, 1 2jiand. (2515-3): 16. The triply-infinite system of simple groups thus reached affords a direct generalization of the doubly-infinite system obtained} differently, BOD) ep a tty eon) P(e" —1), p=%, (wnt, 1). *Proof. A mark / + 0 is an mth power in the GF'[p"] if and only if (p” —1)/m p = ih, @)) By raising (1) to the power m/d, we find a necessary condition, p —1)/d ui? ye 1a: (2) But the condition (2) is sufficient. For, m/d being prime to p” — 1, the extraction in the G#H'[ p”] of the root mid is (by Part I, § 18) always possible and indeed uniquely. Hence from (2) we derive (1). Thus the ( p” —1)d marks satisfying (2) [cf. Moore, 1. c. § 32] give the mth powers in the GF'[ p”]. t Section I, §§ 8-12. {E. H. Moore, A doubly-infinite system of simple groups, Bulletin of the New York Mathemat- ical Society, vol. 3, pp. 73-78, 1894. DICKSON. ANALYTIC REPRESENTATION OF SUBSTITUTIONS. tor Thus 2 (2, n, D) ra Gae ies 1) Gis tes Ve) rs p" Ge 1) d(p" —1) d(p" — 1) d where d is the greatest common divisor of 2 and p" — 1. 17. Our triply-infinite system of simple groups yields exactly 13 having an order < 10,000, viz :* 60: = ((2, 1, 5)) = ((2, 2,2)) = 4.5! TGS (els 1) ((8e162)) 360 ent), 22 3)\=d 6! 504 = ((2, 8, 2)). Gale (2.1 11). 1092 = ((2, 1, 18)). 2448 =- ((2, 1, 17)). 3420 = ((2, 1, 19)). 4080 = ((2, 4, 2)). 5616 = ((3, 1, 3)). 6072 = ((2, 1, 23)). 7800 = ((2, 2, 5)). 9828 — ((2, 3, 8)). The simple group of order 4 . 7! = 2520 is not found in this list. Of interest is that of order 20160 = ((4, 1, 2)) = ((8, 2, 2)) =4.8! By noting that the number 2 (m, n, p)/d(p" — 1) contains the factor p exactly to the power nm (m — 1)/2, we may prove that 4. V! is not of the form ((m, %, 7)) for 8 3. re aes, in ne - Pry ey 7 vs 7 ed eps 4; ’ Ms Pa ees. one ae rower Nee > vas ar 7 ee : IN ZS ; NAN IS \ WY WX {x \ AUS SS IRM SV SQ Ais Vo VAY \ ZI Sl ES YZ Hi Y) S RS v3) Bi; ® AN _ S ZS *: AS Aix Vo Na MQ VY) SS 7 GY N WV Bi NI > IKN Wi wT Ny << Ni TIS SS Zs ASS YN iN WI ASV YY N * we VI KK YT V7 TIS i x7 SW NN B LJ Vj N ix INN Ny iY} S AS — Ns XY KDIYAQVA IK YVTSYTIQY7 PII TINVY ARTS NY [iS WAS QVANY WAN Gi~x TV VA [F Ko WZ RW WASY/ We Zs Q Gi ZB, J INQ SVAN De IS Ny ep NW S \ NAN iss SAS TY IKQW ZS NZ J iN Z, Ny L AAS IY TS IWAN Ny yy, \ yi) NY y —=> Ny NI N Sy Bx Bi; > 1 KAW. MN = (iy f = sizslzNizs A WINE LTS SPARE J. as oS 2 i. ASI SVAW\NA'S ? U, | Se WV) NY - —. KS = NET} SS AY SS tA ge =r a ie —/}| = /} \ | | EIN FSS ESS YF | A ANG YAS AN. X\Y f \ \\ | = =| =f SS Fi | = | | SS 7 SS ANS | I); + |} H\\ iS AVY FIA 4 Wa!/ ANY 2) Seal ie ~ jos = [; S SS fe is = | fF { | yeaa i \\ \ iteaty \ } .\ Wa y | 2 mA i} \ i] = me i} SS SS TASS fF / = | I =! | Wi ¢ f “INS Ur A P ag )i\N 2\ ff fe Ne Jf) Hf} | Ss || Ng 4 | iP Whe = | : lip IF = iP RQ tt 4] 1% y 7, \\ AH} | ~~ | / \ aig ay — | = = LU\ HSS a TP. SAW AE a f J] | SS a a | y S fe Ne S| a, \ WW) = = | 4 g f Y_ AA 4 =f} / i | : | =| [= el \/ ip } f } S WY Val \ YA Hie i} ] ie TS RP) Sy Ly NZ NS ANA NE aK; Re J WANG aK ISIN SK Sk KS 1//r Wh \\ \ | EIS I WWI INIT RE ERR tte POR RER PROS en ed LK\|| SRR RIGS VALI LWA ZS g INAS Ay lasizpleslaglaslanlante ISOISISISISISE! TSEISUSINIIRIIN IST alas gslzczslasts ala slasta as aslantanlg cla slapelanel ays zSlgse STR VISISL ai 4) I dp XS AN) Ss 2) | 7 lig SS tf Q i | j Y/ . AM. | = =f 7 = = INS | ff II ft YW /| = E \ if ae WY =I} fj iS = / \ Vie i; \\ IY ky SUL MAE ISS <> Z KY TRAVIS IOVS YI TSS / ANY TS WIN = : . | : i, 1 # WW WI Wa | ey Gj 2 = f | r aX | Nl | CY ij aN! ¥. WN AN / ij Win VG, N Sl a WS 7 = = NS IN i ITS) SSW ND a > N RS oO Bh ey, F- PK aS) ‘ "ig “A IWIN NAN Z Na W Zi, = PR ASS si S 4 E| WV AQ NI ie 4 Z BUSS ne PSS