wr . . itenfcon Series s ■ SHAKESPEARE SELECT PLAYS AS YOU LIKE IT EDITED by WILLIAM ALDIS WRIGHT, M.A. HON. D.C.L.j LL.D, AND LITT.D. FELLOW AND VICE-MASTER OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE Oxford AT THE CLARENDON PRESS M DCCC XCIX Price Eighteen Pence Return this book on or before the Latest Date stamped below. A charge is made on all overdue books. University of Illinois Library PCD My ‘ < 4 iSS(: EEC 151950 HOt! -4 1966 MAY 0 4 1)91 "APR 0 6 \t Ctonirmt |ms Smts ENGLISH CLASSICS AS YOU LIKE IT W. A. WRIGHT HENRY FROWDE, M.A. Publisher to the University of Oxford LONDON, EDINBURGH, AND NEW YORK Clamt&mt tit-ess levies SHAKESPEARE SELECT PLAYS AS YOU LIKE IT EDITED BY WILLIAM ALDIS WRIGHT, M.A. HON. D.C.L., LL.D: AND LITT.D. FELLOW AND VICE-MASTER OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE 0xfortr AT THE CLARENDON PRESS MDCCCXCIX rRINTED AT THE CLARENDON TRESS BY HORACE HART, M.A. PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY 4/3/41 g. J. R. Me Coll TUd'b 0 3 ^ PREFACE. With regard to the origin and date of this most delightful and popular of Shakespeare’s Comedies there is but little uncertainty. The registers of the Stationers’ Company contain the following entry among others which are found on two leaves at the beginning of vol. C:— 4. Augusti As you like yt / a booke "'| Henry the ffift/a booke j Euery man in his humour / a booke }> to be staied. The commedie of muche A doo about nothing a booke / J These are all under the head of 4 my lord chamberlens menns plaies.’ The year is not given, but the date of the previous entry is 27 May 1600, and that of the following 23 January 1603, and as the other plays mentioned in the entry were printed in 1600 and 1601, it may be fairly conjectured that the year to be f j^ supplied is-1600. The play was probably written in the course of the same year. It is not mentioned by Mere s in the list of Shakespeare’s plays which he gives in Palladis Tamia, and it contains a quotation (iii. 5. 80) from Marlowe’s Hero an d Leander, which was first published in the year 1598. Now Meres’s book was entered at Stationers’ Hall on the 7th of September 1598, and therefore between that date and 4 August 1600, we have to put the three plays Henry V, Much Ado about Nothing, and As You Like It, which are all men¬ tioned in the memorandum made under the latter date, while apparently they were not published when Meres wrote. Again, I I 79660 O 6 PREFACE. VI whereas of the other plays, Every Man in his Humour and Henry V are entered again on 14 August, and Much Ado about Nothing on 23 August 1600, there is no corresponding entry for As You Like It, which so far as is known did not appea r ✓ /> in print till the publication of the first folio in 1623^ In the case of the other three plays the difficulty which caused them to be stayed was speedily removed, and we can only conjecture that As You Like It was not subsequently entered because the announcement of its publication may have been premature and the play may not have been ready. Of internal evidence from the play itself there is nothing decisive. See notes on iv. 1. 134, and iii. 2. 326. There may,possibly be a reference in v. 2. 63 (‘By my life, I do; which.I tender dearly, though I say I am a magician ’) to the severe statute against witch¬ craft which was passed in^the first year of James the First’s reign. Again in iv. 1. 164 (‘by all pretty oaths that are not dangerous ’) we might imagine the Act to restrain the Abuses of Players (3 James I. chap. 21, quoted in notes to the Mer¬ chant of Venice, i. 2. 99) to be pointed at. But both these would give dates too late, and they may easily have been added at some subsequent representation of the play, which was mainly composed, as I think, in the year 1600, and after the other plays which are mentioned with it in the entry at Stationers’ Hall. I am inclined to conjecture that the stay of y publication of As You Like I t mav have been due to the Jact y th at the plav was not completed , because even in the form in which it has come down to us there are marks of hasty work, which seem to indicate that it was hurriedly finished. For instance the name of Jaques is given to the second son of Sir Rowland de Boys at the beginning of the play, and then when he really appears in the last scene he is called in the folios ‘ Second Brother ’ to avoid confounding him with the melancholy Jaques. Again, in the first Act there is a certain confusion between Celia and Rosalind which is not all due to the printer, and gives me the impression that Shakespeare himself, writing in haste, may not have clearly distinguished PREFACE. Vll between the daughter and niece of the usurping Duke. I refer especially to i. 2. 74, 75, which stands thus in the first folio: ‘ Clo. One that old Frede.ricl