in •fc 'W-::^U:t im L I E> RARY OF THE U N IVE.R.5ITY or ILLINOIS l! Wh^ i/l/h ^A/ftt^ e^^-y]AJx4^^^ "LAND AT LAST/' AN IRISH LAND AGENT. DUBLIN : HODGES, FOSTER, AND CO., GRAFTON-STREET PUBLISHERS TO THE UNIVERSITY. ^ 1870. "LAND AT LAST Upon the eve of a revolution in some of the most impor- tant laws which aflfect society, namely, those relating to property, it clearly behoves each one, who either has any property to lose, or who sees a chance of there being any for him honestly to win, to consider what effect such change is likely to produce, and to endeavor, so far as in him lies, that it prove as beneficial, or, at the least, as little injurious as possible to all concerned. And, however v\reary he may be of the land question in Ireland, or however surfeited with heart-rending des- criptions of the woes of the patient, or with the variety of remedies prescribed by quack or physician, he should not be deterred, has he only the means of judging for himself by observation or experience, from endeavoring to arrive at some conclusions of his own, or even (at the risk of breaking the landlords' " conspiracy of silence " ) from expressing them to others. For we may rest assured, whatever be the nature of the impending changes, that it is on the working and application of them the future welfare of the country must depend, and each one should endeavor to foresee in time how to guide and direct them for the best. To enable us to do so, we must first consider the causes, whether real or alleged, which have led to this demand for change ; and although the subject may- appear to many to have been thoroughly exhausted, in reality it is one with which the majority are not only unacquainted, but upon which they have accepted certain statements altogether contrary to facts. Most men now appear ready to concede, that, whether actual and substantial injury has resulted from the work- ing of the present land-laws or not, there is this inherent defect in them, that they admit, in certain cases, of a possible injustice being inflicted, and the very possibility of such a wrong would appear to be sufficient reason for a change in them. This being so, it may perhaps appear unnecessary to consider the amount of injury which has actually resulted from such defects ; but, in order to assist us in dealing with the question under a new regime, it will be well to ascertain, as clearly as possible, the facts as they exist, and, in the first place, to examine them as very usually depicted. - Passing over the eloquent statements of a class of political or professional agitators who find a profitable and congenial fishery in muddying the waters, we may, I think, take the letters of the Times Commissioner as a reasonably fair specimen of opinion on the question ; and although an Irish barrister, with decided political opinions, may not be exactly the class of witness we should select for obtaining impartial evidence on a subject, with the details of which he is obviously unacquainted ; still, I think, we are bound to admit, that, with a very eloquent style o of writing, he has yet avoided exaggeration ; and that if to some few landlords he has administered " Jed'art justice," he has, on the other hand, admitted that many of them are not so black as they are painted. The result of his investigation appears to resolve itself into three distinct assertions, which, if correct, would clearly establish that a substantial and palpable injury, under the existing laws, has accrued to a certain class of tenants. Let us, therefore, take these particular assertions, and endeavor to see how far they are borne out by facts. They may briefly be expressed as follows : — Firstly — That a numerous class, which he correctly terms peasant-tenants, have added useful annexa- tions to their farms, and have given the land certain productive qualities which have increased its letting value ; Secondly — That they have done so at their own ex- pense ; and Thirdly — That these equities, which have been ac- quired by the tenant, have (he has no doubt) occasionally been confiscated by the landlord. The first point, therefore, to examine, is the nature and value of these useful annexations; and, as he has referred to South Wexford as affording the most favorable specimens of them he has met with, we may, perhaps, most easily deal with the question by selecting that locality. They must, I take it, be necessarily comprised under the heads of Buildings, Fencing, Drainage, Planting, and Farm-roads; and the productive qualities added to the land G must, I presume, arise from improved systems of culti- vation and manuring, and from the reclamation of waste land. Let us, therefore, examine each of these separately as they are found in that district, and of course to an inferior extent in other parts of Ireland. And first, we find the buildings on the farms of these peasant-tenants to consist of comfortable dwellings, usually built with walls of yellow clay or mud, generally whitewashed, and with thatched roofs ; and of farm-offices of the same material, but not quite so comfortable — the whole being usually upwards of fifty years erected ; with occasionally a cow-house and barn built with good walls of lime and mortar, and slated roofs, of a more recent date. The fences we find to consist of broads banks of earth, with a dyke on one side, and often on both, frequently running zig-zag, and enclosing fields of various shapes, averaging in size from two to three Irish acres. The drainage, except when part of the expense has been borne by the landlord, or in some wet corner of a field, we find to be almost nil ; and with the exception of half a dozen trees about the house, or occasionally on a fence, the same may be said of the planting. Like most other parts of Ireland, it is sadly deficient in timber ; and I do not remember anything which could be termed a plantation or grove made by the tenant , but if any there be, the trees have surely been registered under the Act, and belong to him. The farm-roads are merely a lane or car-way to the house, and in the vicinity of sea gravel are usually in good repair ; elsewhere, if of any length, they are gene- rally bad enough, with some few exceptions — especially if used by two or three tenants, who usually quarrel about repairing them. Now let us see how these annexations add to or increase the value of the farms. The dwellings are, no doubt, comfortable and fairly suited to the occupants, and although often of great age (as much as one hundred years), the walls are drier, and the roofs warmer in winter and cooler in summer, than if of stone, and slated ; and were it not that they rob the farm of the straw, need not be found fault with. But of what use are either house or offices to the landlord in adding to the value of the farm ? Of what advantage is it to him to have such buildings on from every ten to twenty acres of his estate ? A tenant could pay him a higher rent who held four of such farms with only one such set of buildings; and there- fore any benefit arising from them is exclusively derived by the tenant ; and, in fact, a landlord who merely con- sidered the improvement of his estate, would willingly pay to have them levelled, were it not for a feeling of com- passion for the tenants. Next, as regards the fences, the greatest benefit that conld accrue to the farm would be to have the whole of them levelled. The breadth of land occupied by an ordi- nary one is twenty-one feet — there are many wider ; and therefore, when dividing the farm into three-acre fields, they exactly occupy one-seventh of it — the whole of which is utterly useless, except for the value of the furze, as fuel, which grow on them. Moreover, they are usually crooked, so as to cause what are known as geerogues (short ridges) in the field, which add much labor and waste in ploughing and tilling it. These fences also are often yet older than the buildings, many of them ap- pearing on maps made two hundred years ago. Of the other three descriptions of annexations, I have only to add that a yearly expenditure of one shilling on every seven yards of the lanes would keep them in as good repair as they usually are, and that the drains in the wet corners are usually not deep enough to be of much value. With respect to the improved cultivation, I wish, in the first place, to bear testimony to the characters of both the peasant and larger farmers of this district, as being a most industrious, hardworking, and respectable class, who are quite a credit to any country ; but as to their system of cultivation, it is far behind most parts of Europe. Through want of horse-power and knowledge, the depth of their ploughing does not average five inches, and underneath this there will be found a stratum or layer of mould as hard as a road, and undisturbed since its first formation ; and this system of scratching the surface has been going on for generations. With regard to manure, although I acquit them of the shameful practice, which prevails in most parts of Ireland, of selling their straw and green crops off the farms, and I admit that they draw a certain quantity of lime or phosphates, yet they draw but little dung from the town, nor do they make it by stall-feeding, and, in fact, the value to a field from manuring is withdrawn from it again in the three or four following crops. "With respect to reclamation, there are no regular bogs or waste lands in the district under rent ; but there are mountain commons, on which squatters have expended much labor in reclaiming patches, on which they live rent free, very frequently in a state of poverty, and in which they often sell their interest. The peasant tenants also occasionally fill an old marl hole, or level an inequality in the surface of a field, which adds to the appearance, if not much to the value, of the farms ; but far too many waste and rushy patches still continue to disfigure them. Upon examination, therefore, we find the case to be this — that in the comforts and habits of these farmers a very great improvement, indeed, has taken place within the last few years ; and that, in the tidiness of their dwellings, and a general well-to-do appearance, which takes the eye, about themselves and their places, they are very far before most other parts of Ireland. Even with such conveniencies and luxuries as a threshing and churning machine, a jaunting car, and even a photograph book on their sitting-room table, we find many of them provided, and truly gratifying it is to see it ; but as to permanent improvements in the letting value of their farms, beyond what they have acquired through the increase in value of all kinds of farm produce, not only would the land bring no higher rent now by reason of them (exclusive of this increase), than it did forty years since ; but, in point of fact, the rents are not higher now than they were then. 10 As to the productive qualities which the Times Com- missioner believes them to have added to the land, being in any way approaching to what would elsewhere be considered high farming, it would, I fear, be far more likely to cause the amiable Mr. Mechi a fit of the blues — especially in the item of weeds and dirt, with which most farms are overrun ; and these remarks apply with yet greater force to most other parts of Ireland. In fact, the increase and profit arising from the in- crease in prices has all gone into the tenant's pocket, and " Hinc illse lachrimae" — but of this presently. And with regard to the petite culture of small hold- ings, although no system of tillage is better or more profitable than spade cultivation, yet, of the many small holders in the district, I don't know a dozen who would turn to and dig two or three acres of their land with a spade, preferring rather to work as laborers elsewhere, and to wait for a loan of their neighbor's horses after he has finished his own "season." And now, with respect to any improvements there be, having been created at the expense of the tenants, let us see how this stands. Tt is the invariable cry of the great authorities on this question, that in England the permanent improvementsare efiected at the cost of the landlord, while in Ireland they are done by the tenant. But — putting aside the mani- fest absurdity of comparing an English landlord erecting a house on, say, every couple of hundred acres, with an Irish one having to build from ten to twenty on the same quantity of land — is this statement really true ? 11 I presume it is the same thing, in a commercial point of view, whether a landlord builds a house, and charges the tenant the interest on the outlay in his rent, or whether the tenant builds it himself, and is paid oE both principal and interest by the usor — having originally got the farm at a lower rent in consideration of there being no house on it, and which he was expected to build ; but this is a principle of which Irish tenants (and apparently their self-appointed advocates) are utterly ignorant. Such a theory as that any outlay is ever exhausted by the enjoyment of it is literally unknown to him. I am unable to say what sum a tenant on the West- minster or Mr. Lownde's estate expends in building a house about Eaton-square, on, I believe, a sixty-one years' lease ; but, I presume, if asked to surrender it at the expiration of the term, he will not expect to be repaid the whole of his outlay (not to mention the price of his good-will), or, even if refused, would he look on his land- lord as a felon. Yet this is what an Irish tenant would do if treated so, which he is not. As before stated, most of the buildings and fences of the peasant farmers are from 50 to 100 years old, and many still older ; and the fact of the original tenant having to build them, of course, formed, at the time, an item in calculating the value and rent. Those on each farm probably cost, at the time, about £50 or £60, and are valued by Griffith at an average of from £l 10s. Od. to £2 yearly per farm. The tenants have been repaid the original cost of them many times over, and if the 12 landlord had possession of them to-morrow, the only value they would be to him is by mixing the thatch with the walls for manure, and which would scarcely repay the expense of levelling them. And this brings us to the third statement, that these equities (such as they are) acquired by the tenant have occasionally been confiscated by the landlord. The Times Commissioner is too shrewd, and, I believe, too honest, to attempt to repeat the absurdity that land- lords are in the habit of evicting improving tenants. Probably his own experience may have taught him that, merely in a commercial point of view, a good tenant is far too valuable an article in Ireland to be dealt with in this manner. The truth being that no gentleman landlord in Ireland ever evicts a good tenant luithout full compen- sation. When I can discover an instance to the contrary I shall be happy to admit my error; but it must be a case founded on fact, and not on that prolific seat of incu- bation for Irish grievances — a mare's nest. But he inclines to the belief that landlords are in the habit of, as it were, squeezing out such tenants by over- renting them; and, I have no doubt, he has taken up this idea honestly, not having much practical knowledge of the subject. Let us, therefore, inquire into it in detail. I believe the principle, formerly deemed fair, on which to calculate the rent, was to divide the gross produce of the land into three equal portions, of which one should go to the landlord for rent, one-third for labor and 13 expenses, and one-third is profit for the tenant ; but, at all events, the principle now acted upon elsewhere, and even on the metayer system, is that the nett profits, after deducting expenses, be equally divided between landlord and tenant. jS'ow, except the Meath or Golden Vein land, there is very little in Ireland brings a higher rent than in the dis- trict we have been referring to, save in the case of some landlords who, through a feeling of goodnature, avowedly let their land below the value. Yet, with the exception of a narrow margin bordering the seashore, where seaweed can be had for manure, and where the tenants are the best off of any in the district, there are not a dozen farms in South Wexford let at £3 per Irish acre, — the highest rent being generally 50s. per acre, and the average rate would probably be nearly one third less, or 33s. 4d. Now let us see what this land, even as at present tilled, actually produces ; taking care to be at the liberal side towards the tenant for expenses, which, even inci- dentally, show a strange contrast to the rent, if, under the system alluded to, they were to form equal third parts : — It grows 20 barrels of barley to the acre, which sells at from 16s. to 25s. per barrel ; but let us take it at 16 barrels, at 18s. per barrel, although a low average, this gives the gross produce at . . . £14 8 Deduct for seed and labor ... £4 10 Taxes, ... ... ... 4 4 14 Value of nett prodiice per acre, ... ... £9 14 Landlord's half for rent, ... , ... £4 17 14 There is land in this district which grows 25 barrels to the acre, which at 21s. (a usual price) gives the gross produce at ... ... ... £26 5 And, the cost of labor being alike, gives the nett profit, ... ... ... ... £21 11 Of course every additional barrel he can make the land produce is a clear 18s. to 25s. in the tenant's pocket, the labor and rent being constant quantities. It grows after a manured crop 12 barrels of wheat, at from 25s. to 35s. ; but say 10 barrels at 25s., gives the gross produce, ... ... £1210 Deduct seed and labor, ... ... £4 10 Taxes, ... ... ... 4 £4 14 Nett produce, ... ... ... £7 16 Landlord's half for rent, ... ... £3 18 It grows 70 barrels of potatoes at 10s. (I have known 200 barrels), ... ... ... £35 Deduct seed, labor, manure, and taxes, ... 16 4 Nett profit, ... ... ... ... £18 16 Landlord's half for rent, ... ... £9 8 It grows 20 barrels of beans at from 20s. to 25s. Let us say 16 barrels at 21s., ... ... £16 16 Deduct seed, labor, and manure (they are planted — ^not drilled or hoed — and on inferior manure), 10 4 Nett profit, ... ... ... ... £6 12 Landlord's half, ... ... ... £3 6 It grows 40 tons of mangols at 15s. (should grow 60 or 70 tons, if properly worked), ... £30 15 Deduct manure, seed, labor, and taxes. Landlord's half. 15 4 3 tons of hay at £2 10s., Aftergrass, ... Saving, drawing home, and taxes, Nett profit, ... Landlord's share, 1 acre of grass, with 1 ton of mangol, and J a ton of hay will feed a cow, of the yearly profit of ... £0 15 Deduct value of mangol, ofhay, ... Share of dairy-maid's expense, Interest on value of cow, at £10 per cent. Taxes, Nett profit, .. . Landlord's half, An acre of lea oats, say 16 barrels at 14s., ought to be 20 to 25 barrels, shovelled, Deduct seed, labor, and taxes, Nett profit, ... Landlord's share. it £14 16 £7 8 £7 10 10 £8 1 4 £6 16 £3 8 £12 4 17 6 £7 2 6 £3 11 3 £11 4 5 4 6 3 So that the average nett profit of these eight courses would be £9 14s. Od. per acre, and deducting £10 per cent, from this for contingencies, gives, in round numbers, £8 14s. 6d. per acre, of which the landlord's rentshould be 16 £4 7s. 3d., and whicli is more than double the average rent of this district, or of most lands in other parts of Ireland. In the foregoing calculations I believe I have made a more liberal allowance for labor than it costs a farmer, and I have not taken anything near the maximum quan- tities of produce which the land might be made to pro- duce by thoroughly working it. It must also strike one, how very insignificant two or three shillings per acre, more or less, in the rent is, as compared either with the expense of labor, or with the value of one extra barrel of produce— matters which are very much under the control of the tenant, and depend- ing upon his system of management. Can this, therefore, be fairly said to be rack-renting or squeezing out tenants ? Is it not rather evident that the rent of Ireland is very far below what it fairly might be, and which the tenants, ere long, will learn to their cost under any change in the laws. I do not mean to assert that, under their present system of tillage and small holdings, they are able to pay a much higher rent than they do at present, having usually large families to support on such small plots of land ; but it is the landlords who are the sufferers, through a feeling of compassion for them, and once the question of rent comes to be a matter of business or even of valuation, as is now demanded, and that the landlords begin to deal with it in that way, the present tenants will either have to change their system materially, or else make room for others. 17 And this leads us to the main point of the present observations — namely, the position of the landlord and tenant under the future state of the laws, and the true cause which has led, in the case of some tenants in their ignorance, and of their professional advocates, to join in this outcry for change. No one knows better than the tenant himself that he has got the lion's share under the present state of rents, and he is in constant dread of losing his monopoly ; and he thinks that by being beforehand in raising a cry, he may more easily direct attention from the weak point in his case, and secure this lion's share in perpetuity ; but he will find himself grievously mistaken. The fixity of tenure and rent at valuation, which he is now demanding, is merely the old, exploded doctrine of protection, that he should be able to hold his farm at a lower value than he knows it would bring from others. His idea of valuation is Griffith's valuation, which was made over twenty years back, based upon a scale of prices of produce, which have admittedly increased by nearly one-third since it was published. He would be rather astonished if informed that as his rent was to be fixed in proportion to that valuation, the price he is to get now, or in future, for his pig or his heifer, or his firkin of butter and barrel of barley, is also to be fixed by the same valuation — and yet to this the doctrine to be fair, must be extended, if all classes are equally to benefit by it. Hitherto it is he who has been the gainer by this 18 increase in prices ; and so far from the land being over- rented, or that landlords have been gainers by their tenants' improvements, the very reverse is the fact, that rents are lower than in any country in Europe, as shown by the valuable tables lately published in the Farmer* s Gazette^ and that landlords have been deprived of a large part of their just income through the want of capital, knowledge, industry, or honesty, of their tenants. In point of fact," these tables of Mr. Purdon's, coupled with Mr. Mure's letters in the Times, literally do not leave Mr. Bright and such theorists a leg to stand on. There is land in Leceistershire, Northamptonshire, and Derbyshire, let at the rate of £8 per Irish acre, but little superior to land in the barony of Forth, which is let at 55s. Whether there were tenant-righters in the time of Sir William Petty I know not, but what such men love now- a-days is not justice but favor, and very frequently alms, from their landlords.* Neither do their Irish ideas in- clude the one of fair play, as in Ireland a dozen men will set upon one, and if they want to hit a man they rather prefer he should be down. When the plea for a change in the law is based on the statement that the land is unimproved, because of the want of security, it has (although equally untrue) some appearance of truth to support it; but when the statement is advanced that it has been so much improved (even in the most favored districts) as to tempt the cupidity of * I am occasionally asked by a tenant, when paying his rent, to allow him the price of a pair of shoes — in one instance by a tenant p aying a rent of £60 yearly. 19 landlords, it bears on the face of it its own contradic- tion. So far from rents at the present day being charged on the tenant's improvements, it is fortunately easy to demonstrate beyond the power of contradiction, that, as compared with the value of produce, they are lower by one-half than they were eighty years ago. Because we have not only on record the prices of all kinds of agricultural produce at that date, but also old rent, rolls and leases, made at the time, and previous to it, showing what the rent was then also; and the only matter of surprise is the extraordinary contrast between what tenants paid then and now fur the same land, as compared with the prices. I have on a former occasion''' given the comparative scale of prices in the year 1789 (taken from a newspaper of that date), and in the same month of the year 1867, and the contrast is so remarkable that I am induced again to call attention to it. It is as follows : — 7th March, 1789. 9th March, 1867. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. Barley per barrel 12 6 to 13 Barley per barrel 19 to 23 Wheat „ 23 to 24 6 Wheat „ 36 to 37 6 Oat^ „ 6 to 6 6 Oats „ 14 9 to 15 6 Beans „ 13 to 13 6 Beans „ 20 to 23 Butter per cwt. 24 to 34 Butter per cwt. 100 to 120 Cheese „ 12 to 28 Cheese „ 70 to 75 Beef „ 13 to 18 6 Beef „ 70 to 75 Pork „ 16 to 17 Pork „ 41 to 43 Potatoes per St. IJ to 2 Potatoes per st. 6 to 8 And the price of Poultry, w tiich is extensively reared in A Demurrer to Mr. Butt's Plea." 20 Ireland, has risen from Is. for a Christmas goose or a pair of spring chickens, to 6s. and 7s., within the last 30 years So that one clutch of chickens will now pay the rent of a prime acre of land. So that we find, exclusive of artificial manures, im- provement in breeds of cattle and pigs, cultivation of green crops, and superior seed (advantages altogether extraneous of any merit of the tenants), the average value of the produce of land of every description is nearly three times as high now as it was then ; while, com- paring the rents which were paid at that time with what are paid for the same land now, we find them increased by about one-third ; or, in other words, that while the value of produce has increased as 9 to 3, rent has only increased as 4 to 3. If this be taking advantage of tenants' improvements, it surely does not say much for either the nature or extent of them. But as a cry has been raised, which must necessarily call attention to facts, and the truth will come out the more they are investigated, the tenants must be prepared to take the consequences, and to have both sides heard on the Inquiry. That it must result in an increase of rents there can be no doubt, and probably, too, in improvement to the country ; although many tenants, and perhaps not a few landlords, must go down in the struggle. And it is then the tenant will discover what a hard bed he has made for himself, as compared with what he remembers. 21 No laiv can give a tenant the privileges and favors which he gets voluntarily from his landlord ; and no change in the law ivhich any civilized nation ivill sanction, hut must, if acted on, have the effect of rais- ing the rents of Ireland. And although this result may press heavily on the large number (by far the majority) of contented and industrious tenants, who have never joined in the howl^ or been in the least befooled by the professional agitators, yet it is now inevitable, and they must be prepared to meet it as best they can. For they may rest assured of this, that once the law has been settled, and perhaps Arbitration Courts ap- pointed, that it will not be considered either harsh or unjust of the landlords to avail themselves of the change, and to say to their tenants, the law has been settled at your own request, and now you shall have the benefit of it to the letter — hut nothing more. One can fancy their astonishment when at length the conviction is brought home to them (and it will take both time and determination to do it), that, in future, their dealings with their landlords are reallv to be a matter of business. Their utter incredulity, when in- formed that of no avail is the plea, " Sure I and my breed have been under your honor's for generations," or that the expense of "rearing a heavy family" should ftill equally on him and his landlord. When they discover that, in future, their petitions for favors and allowances are to be dealt with as questions of value and profitable investment, and not of generosity or commiseration — but 22 the truth is, I doubt if they will ever be convinced of it, but will rather deem themselves grievously injured. When recently I have endeavored to explain to tenants who were applying for the usual allowances or assistance towards draining, or for timbers and slates, that, under the contemplated Land Bill, they would have no claim for such allowance until they were leaving their farms; the majority of them laughed at it as an excellent joke, but some few admitted they foresaw that any change in the law would be a loss to them. Were it seriously the intention of the present Govern- ment to adapt the land laws to what are termed " Irish ideas," it would appear that the principle of fixity of tenure is one of the most prominent of them, and it may be amusing just to glance at one little feature involved in this sensible proposal; but however useful they may have fancied such a proposal might be to them for the moment as a cry, it can scarcely be possible that educated and rational men, with even the most rudimentary know- ledge of political economy, would dream, for one moment, of surrendering all that has been gained by years of experience and civilization, and of yielding to the pre- judices of the ignorant and semi-barbarous, and who are not even the majority of the population of this country. The very term Irish ideas, if representing their ideas, involves the necessity of their being benighted and barbarous ones, and it will scarcely be maintained that ihey are wiser and more enlightened than those held by educated men in England on most subjects ; and yet 23 were it really a hopeless task to try to change or improve them, it might, perhaps, have been a question how far a Government, for peace' sake, would be justified in yielding to or adopting them. But here is where the fatal mistake has been made, as only two years ago such ideas were well nigh exploded, and in the next generation would have been cleanly forgotten, Fenianism, whose ranks were recruited, not from the farming class, but from the silly or poverty-stricken residuum of the towns, had collapsed, and tenants were fast arriving at the conviction that the most profitable thing for them was to mind their business ; but all this has been changed, and whatever beneficial results might have been expected in the conduct of the people from changes in the laws, have been utterly frustrated by leading them to suppose that they can force their opinions on England, if they only bully and bellow loud enough. Hence the country has at present retrograded more than 50 years in civilization, and the predicted New Era turns out to be an exaggerated old one in turbulence and terror. As a specimen of " Irish ideas " in the mode of laying out farms, which, of course, the doctrine of fixity of tenure would perpetuate, I annex maps of a couple of town- lands in difierent counties (one of them Wexford), as divided between the occupiers according to Irish ideas, and which are, by no means, exceptional cases, but are taken from a very large number of similar ones. They, no doubt, bear testimony to the ingenuity and originality of the native surveyors, but I doubt if even Mr. Bright, as a practical man, can recommend their general adop- tion, either for economy of labor or convenience. And even absurd as this mode of partitioning farms may be, there is one still worse, which I have occasionally met with, and which has been referred to by the Knight of Kerry, in a letter to the Times. It is where tenants have one field divided between them in alternate ridges or " lokes," as they are termed in Waterford, so that, even where there are only two tenants, each of them owns every second ridge in the same field with the other man's ridge intervening, and one of them will sell his good-will or tenant-right in his ridges to a stranger. Of course in tilling his land each tenant has to hop across his neighbor's ridge to get from one of his own to another ; and Mr. Gladstone may take my word for it that this Irish idea is attended with inconvenience. With respect to Mr. Bright's proposal for creating peasant proprietors, it would be superfluous and even presumption of me to add one word to Mr. Mure's recent letters in the Times on this subject, as he has so thoroughly and completely exhausted it by exposing the practical result, wherever it has been tried, that scarce anything remains to be said ; but I cannot loose this opportunity of expressing my thanks to him for dispel- ling an illusion, which much perplexed men like me when considering it. We could, of course, all see for ourselves the universal ruin, both to land and tenants, which leases in perpetuity at nominal rents, or the ownership of a small townland 25 in fee, involved here, and which has been so generally recognized as to have originated a maxim, that if you wish to ruin a tenant give him a lease for ever rent free ; but we could not understand why so invariable a result in this country should be so very different from what we were led to believe was the case in Belgium and elsewhere, and we were disposed to account for it by some difference of race, or other exceptional cause. This seeming paradox Mr. Mure has cleared up and set at rest for ever, by a very simple solution, which I have long since found applicable to many similar Irish difficulties — namely, that it is untrue, and that, like many such statements advanced by Mr. Bright and his school on which to base their arguments, it is what we term in Ireland the " shine of the moon." For it now turns out, the same system, where found in operation in Belgium, is attended with precisely the same results as here, and it cannot possibly be better expressed than in Mr. Mure's own words, when describing the state of things he found there ; viz., " a swarm of peasant pro- prietors possessing all the vices which too often charac- terize needy power lording over and quarrelling with a rack-rented and oppressed tenantry."''" The only difference in this country being that this class * Should anyone care to judge for himself of a model village upon Mr. Bright's theory, he has only to take a return ticket to the Kathnew Station, on the Duhhn and Wicklow Railway, ad- joining to which he can inspect, at his leisure, the style of archi- tecture, and comfort of the abodes of men dwelling beside the shadow of their own dung heaps. No landlords making them afraid. 26 of proprietors have nearly all disappeared, and the in- terest in their lands been absorbed by some large pro- prietor. In south Wexford are many townlands which were held by the tenants under leases for ever, at 2s. 6d. per acre, and I only now know of one instance where the interest is still vested in a descendant of the original lessee. In the others, they have gone to the bad in about four generations from the dates of the grants. And this leads us to what appears to be about the only omission in Mr. Mure's remarks on the subject. There has seldom, perhaps, been a greater amount of error in the same number of words than in Mr. Bright's proposal, because it is not merely that it is a mistake, but that the course which he advocates is precisely the re- verse of what ought to be adopted by any prudent farmer, who, if he happened to own the fee of his farm, ought at once to dispose of it (the fee), and invest the purchase- money as capital in farming double the quantity of land as a tenant — thereby securing a return for the money at the rate of £10 per cent., instead of at £4 per cent, from it while sunk in the fee. In fact the fee of land is a fancy article, which only a rich man can afford to invest money in, and which, as an investment, by no means suits a man of moderate means who has to live on the interest of his capital, and who re- quires to turn it to better account. And this makes one regret to see what is occurring very frequently in Wexford, and occasionally in other parts of Ireland, where tenants, who have saved a little money by 27 their industry, are investing it in the purchase of a single townland of from fifty to a hundred Irish acres, and often leaving themselves rather short of capital, or borrowing part of the money. So long as they live, who have earned .their money hard, things will go on well, even although not receiving the return for their capital, which from their professional knowledge and experience they ought otherwise be able to do, if it were turned over twice a year in cattle or sheep ; but, as Mr. Mure clearly shows, a class in this position cannot long continue in the present day, and experience has proved that neither could they do so in former ones, so that, as regards these men, it is to be feared, in their grand-children's days " their place will know them no more." One would gladly believe other- wise, for better men in any rank of life are not to be found. And the class which Mr. Bright proposes to get rid of are just the one which will and ought to remain — namely, the very large proprietors, who not only can afford, but actually do manage their estates on the principle, so much extolled, of constructing the permanent improve- ments for their tenants, and who are found to be some of the best landlords in Ireland. As to the system of northern tenant-right, which it is now proposed to extend to the rest of Ireland, I can only repeat a statement which my experience of the working of it has taught me to believe contains a key to the whole practice — which is, that no industrious tenant ever sells the good-ivill of his farm ^ and that the sum which he 28 has to pay to his worthless neighbor for his adjoining land, is merely a tax which indolence and intemperance levies on industry. However, it is useless to argue with those who have no practical knowledge of it, as they will not be convinced ; but the only result of it, if established by law, will be to put large sums in the landlord's pockets as fines, which must, of course, be abstracted from the industrious tenants, as a landlord will get far larger sums from an in-coming tenant than any court will award to the out-going one. Another fallacy of the Times Commissioner, is the blame he attaches to landlords for declining, in so many instances, to grant leases ; but the fact is, as the Knight of Kerry has so clearly shown, " a burnt child dreads the the fire ;" and it is in nowise wonderful if a landlord who, on the expiration of an old lease, finds a farm swarming with paupers, or having had 1 9 crops of oats in succession taken off it, should hesitate about repeating the process infinitessimally. I know a case where, on the expiration of a lease for a term of three lives, there were found residing on the farm seventy families ; and I don't know one case now where a farm, held under an old lease, is exclusively in the occupation of the direct tenant of it. It is idle, too, to attribute this to the landlord's neglect, when even the laws framed purposely to prevent it, when put in motion, were found to be powerless to do so. No doubt, leases, if proper restrictions in them can be enforced, are the true remedy for what is complained of in the Irish land tenure ; but at the same time, as to 29 any difference in the improvement of farms between those held by lease and from year to year, it only exists in those which have been held under unusually long leases, which are invariably in the most neglected condi- tion of any in the same district. Should a new Land Bill only give as much protection against injustice to the land as to the tenants, it will prove a valuable boon to landlords, provided they insist on the provisions of it being carried out in this respect, as well as in those relating to their other dealings with their tenants, and not allow matters — as the tenants will try to prevail on them to do — to relapse into the old system, or to have the rent settled like the cabman's fare — *' leave it to your honor." In fact, the landlords have now the game in their hands if they only play it right, but all must depend upon this. The old system has been tried, and small thanks they have got for it. Let them take the reformers at their word, and insist on the new one. No doubt, they must be prepared for a very serious state of things during the next two or three years, which it is sad to think must involve some, and, perhaps, con- siderable loss of life on both sides. An ignorant and semi-barbarous portion of the popula- tion cannot be roused to frenzy to suit the immediate purpose of a party with impunity, and the reaction, when they find they have been merely made use of for the moment, will be very severe. We may reasonably expect a state of things, in a minor 30 degree, resembling the Cromwellian settlement of Ireland ; but the descendants of those settlers are not likely to forget that their ancestors held their own in far more serious times, and that the land is their own still. Let their children be able to say the same ; and they will also remember that the foe have never been very formid- able in courage or resources, if only met face to face, and have ever speedily collapsed upon the first symptoms of reverse or punishment. So that, in the end, it may only lead to that consummation which a wise man once remarked yet remained to be completed — the conquest of Ireland. That it should need to be effected by physical force is a discreditable state in the end of the nineteenth century ; but history must judge between those who have lighted the " Fiery Cross " and those who have tried to extinguish it. THE END. IRISH FARM HOLDINGS, SHEWING DETACHED PARTS COMPRISING EACH . REIFERENCE. Pa/rk/ij 3radf Tko7/fjzs Mfjrpky^ JoAn/ITclly jSdUvayd Tfol^rtes -. Jaz/zes ffoTt Jburfxs JTegofjiy _._ Ij(zurera:j& Roe — WilZba/??.' RocJie /{a^/b JBrcslj'iL — Jokrh J'lealy I7.7.Z.I Z 2 2 J \3.3 3 S\ \4-.4-. ^.4- 4^.\ S. £. S. ^ \S.6\ \7 7\ on } \ia. w .20.\ \72.\ Sca7^-6r7Tjdi.j&s io Olie S&diUeMtls^ . IRISH FARM HOLDINGS. SHEWING DETACHED f^RTS COMPRISING LAGH. reference:. JofuhMjjpvy Jbuncs Egarv \2Z.Z\ 1 3.1 LiJ Jofirv SuUfVan. -_ 1 6'. 6. 6. 6. 66 6 \ Jatn.e^ Bfjj-J^ley — \rr.\ TuTtjOtky Shjecfy _ S6-6 88 J'ose/ih- Rbordan/^ | 9. } Ri/^jLTci Kelly ^^ fATI rlokfvJC^Cojtky^ \j2. I Ji!X7/j:-iS) A)\