Official U, S, Government Information Program on ECONOMIC STABILIZATION APPENDIX I THE ECOT'CMICS OF imATTON Not for General Pist ribution For the use of media presenting information to the pu"blic The Office of War Information, I'Omes'i'ic Branch January ,^ ■/',/ Appendix 1 — — ■i^/' THE ECOMICS OF imATION wartime inflation is nothing, njore --l^^^^'^^X.^^I'^o^'^ prices generated l.y the Pf-^-.^^^^Lw^s ^Sy reSuse! as a result of ?re^r!Teye Se'^^or^.o^ey affti™: whenVhere are less goods for them to "buy. There was no real danger of ^^^-^l^^^'-'^rrlL'increaL^ln V- oomtry's reooveiy from the 1929-33 ^f'^^f';??-. through the production chasing power "hich occurred then could he .*?!°'^„iiUons of men of more goods. Production f«"l^*^"rf,^^,^S'^„rtcuitural products. It rpSi:^'fnd prLrirf»trrL°L^S%.e growing demand at a reasonalole price level. As will he developed later, even ^ring the early years of the war there was no critical danger in the pi=e situation n »° * the economy, there was ^-'f- ^^^f^^ZvTo^^l^l- in a few instances, ■hTr +v,e> ripfpnqp "aroeTam , Some DottlenecKS occuiitiu., -lh ^ demlnd for goods efSeded supply. There was some rise m P"ce^.^:^t "° morHhan might occur in a peacetime upswing of husiness. .enerally, pressure on prices was localized, not general. Later the situation changed. Total war led to °J/;5gJr3. demand imhalance which could result in a serious general rise m prices. The danfer is not vet over and is not to he taken lightly. Rapidly rising prlS coi^d enoLously complicate the task of ""^"^J'f ?tev fould cause such havoc with our social and economic stmcture as to, cheat us out of the fruits of victory. But there is no occasion for panicky fe.r. If f ^.^^^^^^^^.^o't^ not tegin to minimize the danger of rising prices and if they all do part in the hattle against them, that hattle can he won. . Tf i hardl- likely that the American people will do any less , once they re^LfuSied^w^t?. the danger and told their ^i^^J^^' ^hlch'can^e licked hy the -- soH of determination and co- , operation they are exhihiting in their fight against the Axis. The ArnericcTn xDeoole will win the hattle against rising prices. But to win il jusras'o^win the war, they must recognize the enemy and no ^derestimate his power, Without ever losing confidence in their ability To handle the situation, they must take their opponent's measure. In a wo-d, without he ing frightened, they must he ^^^^^^^^^^ "^^^^^^^'^ danger which cinlF^Hrae^-iFTTnThe war ^^f-^^^^f^^f^f ^ ation the hattlefront , leads to defeat and disaster, ^^^^^^^f^^^*. ^f^' ^a,s is inevitable makes it inevitable hy generating a huymg ^^^f ^ h^ai^Lg. And conversely, the recognition -^-^^^^^^/^ej:'3:::: - he averted generates the resolution and social intelligence necessa^ avert them. - 2 - The paragraphs helovr provide a more detailed explanation of the econo- mics of inflation than could "be gi.ven in the Information Program Sook itself. It is essential that this explanstorj^ material he used vdth dis- cretion to inform, not to frighten. The object of the entire informa- tion program is not the negative one of alarming the American people; it is the positive one of securing a continuation of the active, intelligent support of policies that for a year and a h^lf h-ave prevented any serious rise in prices from occurring.. Why War ?rfcao ii^ric^rion Stahle prices, in the absence of price-control, depend basically upon a balance between supply and demands Total war involves simultaneous attacks on both sides of this balance. It enormously expands demand. It sharply contracts the supply of goods consumers can buy. The results are likely to be analogous to those which would follow if one simultaneously added a weight on one side end-, took a weight from the other side of a perfectly balanced scale. War expenditures increase demand in two ways, directly and indirectly. The direct pressure resulting from Government war expenditures are generally understood, although the magnitude of those expenditures is difficult to grasp and remember. There i.s a job to be done in making the American people aware of the vastness' of the nation's war program. In May, 19^0, defense expenditures were running at an annual rate of $2,0 billion. By October, 19^1, they' had been increased tenfold and, including the expenditures of Government corporations, were running at an annual rate of $22,2 billion-, In May 19^3 they were running at an annual rate of $88 billion. By May 19UU the annual rate had risen to billion, a figure which exceeds the total national income of the boom year 1929. But the effect of the Government's expenditures upon prices is not exerted only directly through its purchases, or confined to the prices of goods needed for war. The heavy outlays which the arms program requires, being disbursed in the- form of wages, salaries, profits, and other forms of income to the community at large, put more money in the hands of wage- earners, salaried workers, and shareholders ^ Part of this additional income is saved and part is paid in higher taxes, but some is used for the purchase of goods and services. The expenditures of these additional suras in turn causes a further expansion of income and demand end further pressure on the prices of all products. One reason for the pressure on food prices, for example, is that war workers and others are using their expanded income to bring their .diet up to a higher- level. The increased demand for goods, furthermore i makes necessary additional expenditures by business to replace, repair or augment productive facili- ties. These expenditures h^ve been kept to a minimum by the more urgent needs of the war for manpower and materials, but to the extent that they occur they lead to further pressure on the price structure < Thus the original increase in Government expenditures results in a v.ddespread ex- pansion of demand throughout the economy. -• . The Concurrent Rest miction of Supply This expansiori of demand would not be dangerous if it could be met by- increased production of goods. But at the same time that waf increases the demand for goods, it limits the supply available to civilians . The reason is apparent: Anerica, for all her vast resources, has not a limitless supply of materials, manpower and machinery. At some point in the development of a war economy more "guns mean less butter. The same steel plate cannot be used for both an automobile and a tank; the same sheet of rubber cannot make a tire for both a pleasure car and a jeep? the same tanker cannot carry gasoline both to New England and to the European or Asiatic battiefronts. Civilian production is believed to have reached its peak in August, I5U1, Since then, although total output has continued to rise, the pro- duction of civilian goods (when allowance is taken of new capital construc- tion) has declined, as more productive capacity labor, plants and material was diverted to war production. Industrial production for civilian use, including materials and producers eouipment, in 19^3 ^'^^^s about 8Cfl of the 1935-9 average, 'or Uo^ less than the peak reached in 19^1. (FEB Jan. 'W) The effect of war in restricting the supply' of things available to civilians is perhaps most clearly seen in connection with production. People realize that there is some limit to the amount of steel or aluminum the nation can produce, Though it is less evident, war also sets limits on the supply of available consumer services. In this area, manpower is the great bottleneck. The nation, 'for example, has only a given number of doctors. As more and more of them are absorbed into the Armed Services, fewer are available to serve the needs of the civilian population. The Gap ^Between Supply and Demand It is the simultaneous expansion of demand and restriction of supply which creates the danger of an explosive rise in prices, A gap arises between the amount of money people have at their disposal to spend and the amount of goods and services available for them to buy. There is then a natural tendency for people to compete among themselve to satisfy .their individual wants. In effect, they bid against one another competitively for the things which are available. Of course, not all of the money received by individuals as .income is . available for spending. Allowance must* be made for taxes, which have increased sharply since the beginning of the war. But income payments have increased so enormously that even after taxes people have unprecedentedly large sums at their disposal, In I9HU income payments to individuals are estimated to have reached $1^5 billion. Taxes amounted to $20 billion, leaving $135 billion available to people for spending. But there were only $97 billion worth of goods and services available for them to buy. The gap between disposable income and the available supply of goods — sometimes referred to as "the inflationary gap" — amounted to $38 billion,' Of course, some of this money would have no-mally flowed into non- inflationary forms of savings, such as insurance and savings accounts, O'r 'ilL, LIB. - k - But most of those J,S billion dollars w^re pdtentially dailge'l-ous dollars. To the extent that they were not invested in War ^onds and other forms of savings, they 'could "have heen used mischievously, to'Md up prices, Orle of ■ the primary purposes of the Economic Stabilization Information Program is to see that '^s many of these potentially dangerous dollars as possible are diverted to safe channels, so that there is a minimum of excess purchasing poWel* exerting pressure on the p'rice" structure. •Excess spending power is spread amchg all economic groupsv This fact m^ be difficult to grasp at first. The average worker maMr^- $30 or $Uo a week doessn't think of himself as having' "exce'ss spending power," Uor does the farmer, even though he Is getting the highest^ prices in 20 years. One of the big problems of the. informational program' is to bring home the danger of excess spending in personal terms to make the individual citi2en realize that wan^ings -against buying freely apply to him, u' ■ . / ■■ ' H>»w Prices Rise : The expansion of purchasing power and' contraction of civilian supply is, of course, a gradual process, not something -which occurs." in- a single day. Economic measures which are effective at a given time may be either premature or inadequate' at another stage of the development of the war .economy. ■• ■ • ... Actually, the' economic pressures generated by v.^ar develop continu- ously. -It is conVenien»t, however, to divide the process into stages corresponding to the degree of utilization of productive cat>S(iity. As has been said, if ' an exj^ansion of 'demand occurs when there Is still unused productive capacity, it need not result in much pressure upon prices. Its effect is mainly to' elicit an increase of production. This was the case in the first year of the defense program, between May l9to'a'nd'May 19U1 the Federal Reserve Board's index of Industrial pi*oduction rose 3^ percent, while wholesale prices roSe onl^r'e'ight per- cent. This 'Was achieved largely because it was both possible and profitable to- expand operations at the existing price level. Unused capacity existed throughout t|ie economy. This situation could not exis-t long in all' industries because of the uneven character of the