UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY Class Book Volume Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/englishmenoflett02morl_0 ©nglisf) Jfoleit of ^Letters EDITED BY JOHN MORLEY VOL. II MILTON GOLDSMITH COWPER MILTON By MARK PATTISON, B.D. GOLDSMITH By WILLIAM BLACK COWPER By GOLDWIN SMITH MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED ST. MARTIN’S STREET, LONDON tfitgttett 3Hrn of 3tcttcr£» EDITED BY .TORN MORE MILTON M I L T O N BY MARK PATTISON, B.D. RECTOR OP LINCOLN COLLEGE, OXFORD MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED ST. MARTIN’S STREET, LONDON 1909 First Edition 1879 Reprinted 1880, 1883, 1885, 1887, 1890, 1894, 1895, 1896, 1900, 1902, 1906, 1909 CONTENTS a £ FIRST PERIOD. 1608 — 1639 . ^ . CHAPTER I. \i) page Family— School— College. . ] CHAPTER II. Residence at Horton4-L’ allegro — II CADE8 — COMUS — LYCIDAS Penseroso— -Ar- 12 CHAPTER III. Journey to Italy . .32 O IN SECOND PERIOD . 1640 - 1 660 . .... CHAPTER IV. \ r Educational Theory— Teaching . . . . 43 7 'Marriage and pi CHAPTER V. Pamphlet on Divorce » 4 50 < r > Pamphlets . y7 CHAPTER VI. » • 64 K CHAPTER VIJ. Biographical. 1640—1649 .... e a 85 152007 CONTENTS. m CHAPTER VIII. The Latin Secretaryship . &- CHAPTEE IX. Milton and Salmasius — Blindness H n _ XyL Milton and Morus — The Second Defence — The Defence CHAPTER X. FOR HIMSELF CHAPTER XI. Latin Secretaryship comes to an end — Milton’s Friends THIRD PERIOD. 1 660 — 1 674 . C CHAPTER XII. Biographical — Literary Occupation — Religious Opinions CHAPTER XIII. Paradise Lost — Paradise Regained— Samson Agonistbs . PAGE 93 105 112 119 140 185 INDEX 221 MILTON MILTON. FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. CHAPTER I. FAMILY — SCHOOL — COLLEGE. In the seventeenth century it was not the custom to pub* lish two volumes upon every man or woman whose name had appeared on a title-page. Nor, where lives of authors were written, were they written with the redundancy of particulars which is now allowed. Especially are the lives of the poets and dramatists obscure and meagrely recorded. Of Milton, however, we know more personal details than of any man of letters of that age. Edward Phillips, the poet’s nephew, who was brought up by his uncle, and lived in habits of intercourse with him to the last, wrote a life, brief, inexact, superficial, but valuable from the nearness of the writer to the subject of his memoir. A cotemporary of Milton, John Aubrey (b. 1625), “a very honest man, and accurate in his accounts of matters of fact,” as Toland says of him, made it his business to learn all he could about Milton’s habits. Aubrey was himself B 2 FIRST PERIOD, 1608—1639, [chap. acquainted with Milton, and diligently catechised the poet’s widow, his brother, and his nephew, scrupulously writing down each detail as it came to him, in the minutes of lives which he supplied to Antony Wood to he worked up in his Athence and Fasti. Aubrey was only an anti- quarian collector, and was mainly dependent on what could he learned from the family. None of Milton’s family, and least of all Edward Phillips, were of a capacity to apprehend moral or mental qualities, and they could only tell Aubrey of his goings out and his comings in, of the clothes he wore, the dates of events, the names of his acquaintance. In compensation for the want of observa- tion on the part of his own kith and kin, Milton himself, with a superb and ingenuous egotism, has revealed the secret of his thoughts and feelings in numerous autobio- graphical passages of his prose writings. From what he directly communicates, and from what he unconsciously betrays, we obtain an internal life of the mind, more ample than that external life of the bodily machine, which we owe to Aubrey and Phillips. In our own generation all that printed books or writ- ten documents have preserved about Milton has been laboriously brought together by Professor David Masson, in whose Life of Milton we have the most exhaustive bio- graphy that ever was compiled of any Englishman. It is a noble and final monument erected to the poet’s memory, two centuries after his death. My excuse for attempting to write of Milton after Mr. Masson is that his life is in six volumes octavo, with a total of some four to five thousand pages. The present outline is written for a different class of readers, those, namely, who cannot afford to know more of Milton than can be told in some two hundred and fifty pages. BIRTH. 3 *0 A fa mily of Miltons, deriving the name in all probability from the parish of Great Milton near Thame, is found in various branches spread over Oxfordshire and the adjoin- ing counties in the reign of Elisabeth. The poet’s grand- father was a substantial yeoman, living at Stanton St. John, about live miles from Oxford, within the forest of Shot- over, of which he was also an under-ranger. The ranger’s son John was at school in Oxford, possibly as a chorister, conformed to the Established Church, and was in conse- quence cast off by his father, who adhered to the old faith. The disinherited son went up to London, and by the assistance of a friend was set up in business as a scrivener. A scrivener discharged some of the functions which, at the present day, are undertaken for us in a solicitor’s office. John Milton the father, being a man of probity and force of character, was soon on the way to acquire “ a plentiful fortune.” But he continued to live over his shop, which was in Bread Street, Cheapside, and which bore the sign of the Spread Eagle, the family crest. It was at the Spread Eagle that his eldest son, John Milton, was bom^ 9th December, 1608, being thus exactly cotemporary with Lord Clarendon, who also died in the same year as the poet. Milton must be added to the long roll of our poets who have been natives of the city which now never sees sunlight or blue sky, along with Chaucer, Spenser, Herrick, Cowley, Shirley, Ben Jonson, Pope, Gray, Keats. Besides attend- ing as a day-scholar at St. Paul’s School, which was close at hand, his father engaged for him a private tutor at home. The household of the Spread Eagle not only enjoyed civic prosperity, hut some share of that liberal cultivation, which, if not imbibed in the home, neither school nor college ever confers. The scrivener was not 4 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [CHA.P, only an amateur in music, but a composer, whose tunes, songs, and airs found their way into the best collections of music. Both schoolmaster and tutor were men of mark. The high master of St. Paul's at that time was Alexander Gill, an M.A. of Corpus Cliristi College, Oxford, who was 66 esteemed to have such an excellent way of training up youth, that none in his time went beyond it." The private tutor was Thomas Young, who was, or had been, curate to Mr. Gataker, of Kotherhithe, itself a certificate of merit, even if we had not the pupil's emphatic testimony of gratitude. Milton's fourth elegy is addressed to Young, when, in 1627, he was settled at Hamburg, crediting him with having first infused into his pupil a taste for classic literature and poetry. Biographers have derived Milton's Presbyterianism in 1641 from the lessons twenty years before of this Thomas Young, a Scotchman, and one of the authors of the Smectymnum . This, however, is a misreading of Milton's mind — a mind which was an organic whole — “ whose seed was in itself," seK-deterinined ; not one whose opinions can be accounted for by contagion or casual impact. Of Milton’s boyish exercises two have been preserved. They are English paraphrases of two of the Davidic Psalms, and were done at the age of fifteen. That they were thought by himself worth printing in the same volume with Comus , is the most noteworthy thing about them. No words are so commonplace but that they can be made to yield inference by a biographer. And even in these school exercises we think we can discern that the future poet was already a diligent reader of Sylvester's Du Bartas (1605), the patriarch of Protestant poetry, and of Fairfax's Tasso (1600). There are other indi- cations that, from very early years, poetry had assumed BOYHOOD AND YOUTH. 6 *0 a place in Milton’s mind, not merely as a juvenile pastime, but as an occupation of serious import. Young Gill, son of the high master, a school-fellow of Milton, went up to Trinity, Oxford, where he got into trouble by being informed against by Chillingworth, who reported incautious political speeches of Gill to his godfather, Laud. With Gill Milton corresponded ; they exchanged their verses, Greek, Latin, and English, with a confession on Milton’s part that he prefers English and Latin composition to Greek ; that to write Greek verses in this age is to sing to the deaf. Gill, Milton finds “ a severe critic of poetry, however disposed to be lenient to his friend’s attempts.” If Milton’s genius did not announce itself in his para- phrases of Psalms, it did in his impetuosity in learning, “ which I seized with such eagerness that from the twelfth year of my age, I scarce ever went to bed before midnight.” Such is his own account. And it is worth notice that we have here an incidental test of the trust- worthiness of Aubrey’s reminiscences. Aubrey’s words are, “When he was very young he studied very hard, and sate up very late, commonly till twelve or one o’clock at night ; and his father ordered the maid to sit up for him.” He was ready for college, at., sixte en^ not earlier than the usual age at that period. As his schoolmasters, both the Gills, were Oxford men (Young was of St. Andrew’s), it might have been expected that the young scholar would have been placed at Oxford. However, it was determined that he should go to Cambridge, where he was admitted a pensioner of Christ’s, 12th February, 1625, and com- menced residence in the Easter term ensuing. Perhaps his father feared the growing High Church, or, as it was 6 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [chap. fclien called, Arminianism, of his own university. It so happened, however, that the tutor to whom the young Milton was consigned was specially noted for Arminian proclivities. This was William Chappell, then Fellow of Christ’s, who so recommended himself to Laud by his party zeal, that he was advanced to be Provost of Dublin and Bishop of Cork. Milton was one of those pupils who are more likely to react against a tutor than to take a ply from him. A preaching .divine — Chappell composed a treatise on the art of preaching— a narrow ecclesiastic of the type loved by Laud, was exactly the man who would drive Milton into opposition. But the tutor of the seventeenth century was not able, like the easy-going tutor of the eighteenth, to leave the young rebel to pursue the reading of his choice in his own chamber. Chappell endeavoured to drive his pupil along the scholastic highway of exercises. Milton, returning to Cambridge after his summer vacation, eager for the acquisition of wisdom, complains that he “ was dragged from his studies, and compelled to employ himself in composing some frivolous declamation ! ” In- docile, as he confesses himself (indocilisque astas prava magistra fuit), he kicked against either the discipline or the exercises exacted by college rules. He was punished. Aubrey had heard that he was flogged, a thing not im- possible in itself, as the Admonition Booh of Emanuel gives an instance of corporal chastisement as late as 1667. Aubrey’s statement, however, is a dubitative interlineation in his MS., and Milton’s age, seventeen, as well as the silence of his later detractors, who raked up everything which could be told to his disadvantage, concur to make us hesitate to accept a fact on so slender evidence. Any- how, Milton was sent away from college for a time, in the AT CAMBRIDGE. 7 *0 year 1627, in consequence of something unpleasant which had occurred. That it was something of which he was not ashamed is clear, from his alluding to it himself in the lines written at the time, — Nee duri libet usque minas perferre magistri Caeteraque ingenio non subeunda meo. And that the tutor was not considered to have been wholly free from blame is evident from the fact that the master transferred Milton from Chappell to another tutor, a very unusual proceeding. Whatever the nature of the punishment, it was not what is known as rustication ; for Milton did not lose a term, taking his two degrees of B.A. and M.A. in regular course, at the earliest date from his matriculation permitted by the statutes. The one outbreak of juvenile petulance and indiscipline over, Milton’s force of character and unusual attainments ac- quired him the esteem of his seniors. The nickname of “ the lady of Christ’s” given him in derision by his fellow- students, is an attestation of virtuous conduct. Ten years later, in 1642, Milton takes an opportunity to “ acknowledge publicly, with all grateful mind, that more than ordinary respect which I found, above many of my equals, at the hands of those courteous and learned men, the Fellows of that college wherein I spent some years ; who, at my parting after I had taken two degrees, as the manner is, signified many ways how much better it would content them that I w^ould stay ; as by many letters full of kindness and loving respect, both before that time and long after, I was assured of their singular good affection towards me.” The words “ how much better it would content them that I would stay ” have been thought to hint at the 8 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [chap. offer of a fellowship at Christ’s. It is highly improbable that such an offer was ever made. There had been two vacancies in the roll of fellows since Milton had become eligible by taking his B.A. degree, and he had been passed over in favour of juniors. It is possible that Milton was not statutably eligible, for, by the statutes of Christ’s, there could not be, at one time, more than two fellows who were natives of the same county. Edward King, who was Milton’s junior, was put in, not by college election, but by royal mandate. And in universities generally, it is not literature or general acquirements which recommend a candidate for endowed posts, but technical skill in the prescribed exercises, and a pedagogic intention. Further than this, had a fellowship in his college been attainable, it would not have had much attraction for Milton. A fellowship implied two things, residence in college, with teaching, and orders in the church. With neither of these two conditions was Milton prepared to comply. In 1632, when he proceeded to his M.A. degree, Milton was twenty-four, he had been seven years in college, and had therefore sufficient experience what college life was like. He who was so impatient of the “ turba legentum prava ” in the Bodleian library, could not have patiently consorted with the vulgar-minded and illiterate ecclesiastics, who peopled the colleges of that day. Even Mede, though the author of Clavis Apo- calyptica was steeped in the soulless clericalism of his age, could not support his brother-fellows without fre- quent retirements to Balsham, “ being not willing to be joined with such company.” To be dependent upon Bainbrigge’s (the Master of Christ’s) good pleasure for a supply of pupils; to have to live in daily intercourse AT CAMBRIDGE. 9 ‘J with the Powers and the Chappells, such as we know them from Mede’s letters, was an existence to which only the want of daily bread could have driven Milton. Happily his father’s circumstances were not such as to make a fellowship pecuniarily an object to the son. If he longed for “ the studious cloister’s pale,” he had been, now for seven years, near enough to college life to have dis- pelled the dream that it was a life of lettered leisure and philosophic retirement. It was just about Milton’s time that the college tutor finally supplanted the university professor, a system which implied the substitution of excercises performed by the pupil for instruction given by the teacher. Whatever advantages this system brought with it, it brought inevitably the degradation of the teacher, who was thus dispensed from knowledge, having only to attend to form. The time of the college tutor was engrossed by the details of scholastic super- intendence, and the frivolous worry of academical busi- ness. Admissions, matriculations, disputations, declama tions, the formalities of degrees, public reception of royal and noble visitors, filled every hour of his day, and left no time, even if he had had the taste, for private study. To teaching, as we shall see, Milton was far from averse. But then it must be teaching as he understood it, a teach- ing which should expand the intellect and raise the cha- racter, not dexterity in playing with the verbal formulas of the disputations of the schools. Such an occupation could have no attractions for one who was even now meditating II Pe?iseroso (composed 1633). At twenty he had already confided to his school- fellow, the younger Gill, the secret of his discontent with the Cambridge tone. “ Here among us,” he writes from college, “ are barely one or two who do not flutter io FIRST PEEIOD. 1608—1639. [chap. off, all unfledged, into theology, having gotten of philology or of philosophy scarce so much as a smattering. And for theology they are content with just what is enough to enable them to patch up a pad try sermon.” He re- tained the same feeling towards his Alma Mater in 1641, when he wrote (Eeason of Church Government), “ Cam- bridge, which as in the time of her better health, and mine own younger judgment, I never greatly admired, so now much less . . . .” On a review of all these indications of feeling, I should conclude that Milton never had serious thoughts of a college fellowship, and that his antipathy arose from a sense of his own incompatibility of temper with academic life, and was not, like Phineas Fletcher’s, the result of disappointed hopes, and a sense of injury for having been refused a fellowship at King’s. One consideration which remains to be mentioned would alone be de- cisive in favour of this view. A fellowship required orders. Milton had been intended for the church, and had been sent to college with that view. By the time he left Cambridge, at twenty-four, it had become clear, both to himself and his family, that he could never submit his understanding to the trammels of church formularies. His later mind, about 1641, is expressed by himself in his own forcible style, — “ The church, to whose service by the intention of my parents and friends I was destined of a child, and in mine own resolutions, till coming to some maturity of years, and perceiving what tyranny had invaded in the church, that he who would take orders must subscribe slave, and take an oath withal. ... I thought it better to prefer a blameless silence before the sacred office of speaking, bought and begun with servitude and forswearing.” When he took AT CAMBRIDGE. 11 *0 leave of the university, in 1632, he had perhaps not developed this distinct antipathy to the establishment. For in a letter, preserved in Trinity College, and written in the winter of 1631-32, he does not put forward any conscientious objections to the clerical profession, but only apologises to the friend to whom the letter is addressed, for delay in making choice of some profession. The delay itself sprung from an unconscious distaste. In a mind of the consistent texture of Milton’s, motives are secretly influential before they emerge in consciousness. We shall not be wrong in asserting that when he left Cambridge in 1632, it was already impossible, in the nature of things, that he should have taken orders in the Church of England, or a fellowship of which orders were a condition. CHAPTER 33. RESIDENCE AT HORTON L’ ALLEGRO 1L PENSEROSO— AR- CADES COMUS — LYCIDAS. Milton had been sent to college to quality for a profession. The church, the first intended, he had gradually dis- covered to be incompatible. Of the law, either his father’s branch, or some other, he seems to have enter- tained a thought, but to have speedily dismissed it. So at the age of twenty-four he returned to his father’s house, bringing nothing with him but his education and a silent purpose. The elder Milton had now retired from busi- ness, with sufficient means but not with wealth. Though John was the eldest son, there were two other children, a brother, Christopher, and a sister, Anne. To have no profession, even a nominal one, to be above trade and below the status of squire or yeoman, and to come home with the avowed object of leading an idle life, was conduct which required justification. Milton felt it to be so. In a letter addressed, in 1632, to some senior friend at Cambridge, name unknown, he thanks him for being a a good watchman to admonish that the hours of the night pass on, for so I call my life as yet obscure and unser- viceable to mankind, and that the day with me is at hand, CH. II.] RESIDENCE AT HORTON. 13 wherein Christ commands all to labour.” Milton has no misgivings. He knows that what he is doing with him- self is the best he can do. His aim is far above bread- winning, and therefore his probation must be long. He destines for himself no indolent tarrying in the garden of Armida. His is a “mind made and set wholly on the accomplishment of greatest things.” He knows that the looker-on will hardly accept his apology for “being late,” that it is in order to being “ more fit.” Yet it is the only apology he can offer. And he is dissatisfied with his own progress. “ I am something suspicious of myself, and do take notice of a certain belatedness in me.” Of this frame of mind the record is the second sonnet, lines which are an inseparable part of Milton’s biography — How soon hath Time, the subtle thief of youth, Stol’n on his wing my three-and- twentieth year 1 My hasting days fly on with full career, But my late spring no bud or blossom shew’th. Perhaps my semblance might deceive the truth That I to manhood am arrived so near, And inward ripeness doth much less appear, That some more timely-happy spirits endu’th. Yet, be it less or more, or soon or slow, It shall be still in strictest measure even To that same lot, however mean or high, Toward which Time leads me, and the will of Heaven. All is, if I have grace to use it so, As ever in my great Taskmaster's eye. With aspirations thus vast, though unformed, with “ amplitude of mind to greatest deeds,” Milton, retired to his father’s house in the country. Five more years of self-education, added to the seven years of academical residence, were not too much for the meditation of pro- jects such as Milton was already conceiving. Years many 14 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [chap. more than twel ve, filled with great events and distracting interests, were to pass over before the body and shape of Paradise Lost was given to these imaginings. The country retirement in which the elder Milton had fixed himself was the little village of Horton, situated in that southernmost angle of the county of Buckingham, which insinuates itself between Berks and Middlesex. Though London was only about seventeen miles distant, it was the London of Charles I., with its population of some 300,000 only; before coaches and macadamised roads ; while the Colne, which flows through the village, was still a river, and not the kennel of a paper-mill. There was no lack of water and wood, meadow and pas- ture, closes and open field, with the regal towers of Windsor “ bosom’d high in tufted trees,” to crown the landscape. Unbroken leisure, solitude, tranquillity of mind, surrounded by the thickets and woods, which Pliny thought indispensable to poetical meditation (Epist. 9. 10), no poet’s career was ever commenced under more favour- able auspices. The youth of Milton stands in strong contrast with the misery, turmoil, chance medley, struggle with poverty, or abandonment to dissipation, which blighted the early years of so many of our men of letters. Milton ’s life is a dram a in three ac ts. Tl ^e first dis - covers him in the calm and peaceful retirement of Horton, of which U Allegro, II Penseroso , and Lycidas are the expression. In the seco nd act he is breathing the foul and heated atmosphere of party passion and religious hate, generating the lurid fires which glare in the bat- tailous canticles of his prose pamphlets. The three great poems, Paradise Lost , Paradise Regained , and Samson AgonisteSy are the utterance of his final period of solitary and Promethean grandeur, when, blind, destitute, friend- RESIDENCE AT HORTON. 16 less, he testified of righteousness, temperance, and judg- ment to come, alone before a fallen world. In this delicious retirement of Horton, in alternate communing with nature and with books, for five years of persevering study he laid in a stock, not of learning, but of what is far above learning, of wide and accurate know- ledge. Of the man whose profession is learning, it is characteristic that knowledge is its own end, and research its own reward. To Milton all knowledge, all life, virtue itself, was already only a means to a further end. He will know only “that which is of use to know,” and by useful, he meant that which conduced to form him for his vocation of poet. From a very early period Milton had taken poetry to be his vocation, in the most solemn and earnest mood. The idea of this devotion was the shaping idea of his life. It was, indeed, a bent of nature, with roots drawing from deeper strata of character than any act of reasoned will, which kept him out of the professions, and now fixed him, a seeming idler, but really hard at work, in his father’s house at Horton. The intimation which he had given of his purpose in the sonnet above quoted had be- come, in 1641, “an inward prompting which grows daily upon me, that by labour and intent study, which I take to be my portion in this life, joined with the strong propen- sity of nature, I might perhaps leave something so written to after times, as they should not willingly let it die.” What the ultimate form of his poetic utterance shall be, he is in no hurry to decide. He will be “ long choosing,” and quite content to be “ beginning late.” All his care at present is to qualify himself for the lofty function to which he aspires. No lawyer, physician, statesman, evei laboured to fit himself for his profession harder than 16 FIRST PERIOD 1608—1639. [chap, Milton strove to qualify himself for his vocation of poet. Verse-making is, to the wits, a game of ingenuity ; to Milton, it is a prophetic office, towards which the will of heaven leads him. The creation he contemplates will not flow from him as the stanzas of the Gerusalemme did from Tasso at twenty-one. Before he can make a poem, Milton will make himself. “I was confirmed in this opinion, that he who would not he frustrated of his hope to write well hereafter in laudable things ought himself to be a true poem .... not presuming to sing high praises of heroic men or famous cities, unless he have in himself the experience and practice of all that which is praise- worthy.” Of the spontaneity, the abandon, which are supposed to be characteristic of the poetical nature, there is nothing here ; all is moral purpose, precision, self-dedication. So he acquires all knowledge, not for knowledge 7 sake, from the instinct of learning, the necessity for completeness, but because he is to be a poet. Hor will he only have knowledge, he will have wisdom ; moral development shall go hand in hand with intellectual. A poet’s soul should “ contain of good, wise, just, the perfect shape.” He will cherish continually a pure mind in a pure body. “ I argued to myself that, if unchastity in a woman, whom St. Paul terms the glory of man, be such a scandal and dishonour, then certainly in a man, who is both the image and glory of God, it must, though commonly not so thought, be much more deflouring and dishonourable.” There is yet a third constituent of the poetical nature ; to knowledge and to virtue must be added religion. For it is from God that the poet’s thoughts come. “This is not to be obtained but by devout prayer to that Eternal Spirit that can enrich with all utterance and knowledge, nj RESIDENCE AT HORTON. 17 and sends out his seraphim with the hallowed fire of his altar, to touch and purify the life of whom he pleases. To this must he added industrious and select reading, steady observation, and insight into all seemly and generous acts and affairs ; till which in some measure he compast, I refuse not to sustain this expectation.” Before the piety of this vow, Dr. Johnson’s morosity yields for a moment, and he is forced to exclaim, “ From a promise like this, at once fervid, pious, and rational, might he expected the Paradise Lost .” Of thes e years of self-cultivation, of conscious moral a rchitectur e, such as Plato enacted for his ideal State, hut none hut Milton ever had the courage to practise, the biographer would gladly give a minute account. But the means of doing so are wanting. The poet kept no diary of his reading, such as some great students, e. g. Isaac Casaubon, have left. Nor could such a record, had it been attempted, have shown ns the secret process by which the scholar’s dead learning was transmuted in Milton’s mind into living imagery. u Many studious and contemplative years, altogether spent in the search of re- ligious and civil knowledge ” is his own description of the period. “ You make many inquiries as to what I am about;” he writes to Diodati — “ what am I thinking of % Why, with God’s help, of immortality ! Forgive the word, I only whisper it in your ear ! Yes, X am pluming my wings for a flight.” This was in 1637, at the end of flve years of the Horton probation. The poems, which, rightly read, are strewn with autobiographical hints, are not silent as to the intention of this period. In Paradise Regained (i. 196), Milton reveals himself. And in Comus , written at Horton, the lines 375 and following are charged with the same sentiment, — o 18 FIRST PERIOD. 1608-1639. [CHAr, And wisdom’s self Gfb seeks to sweet retired solitude, Where, with her best nurse, contemplation, She plumes her feathers, and lets grow her wings. That in the various bustle of resort Were all -to rallied and sometimes impair’d. That at Horton Milton " read all the Greek and Latin writers” is one of Johnson’s careless versions of Milton’s own words, “ enjoyed a complete holiday in turning over Latin and Greek authors.” Milton read, not as a pro- fessional phi lologian, hut as a poet and scholar, and always in the light of his secret purpose. It was not in his way to sit down to read over all the Greek and Latin writers, as Casaubon or Salmasius might do. Milton read with selection, and “ meditated,” says Aubrey, what he read. His practice conformed to the principle he has himself laid down in the often-quoted lines (Paradise Regained , iv. 322)— Who reads Incessantly, and to his reading brings not A spirit and judgment equal or superior, Uncertain and unsettled still remains, Deep vers’d in books, and shallow in himself. Some of Milton’s Greek books have been traced ; his Aratus , Lycophron , Euripides (the Stephanus of 1602), and his Pindar (the Benedictus of 1620), are still extant, with marginal memoranda, which should seem to evince careful and discerning reading. One critic even thought it worth while to accuse Joshua Barnes of silently appro- priating conjectural emendations from Milton’s Euripides. But Milton’s own poems are the best evidence of his familiarity with all that is most choice in the remains of classic poetry. Though the commentators are accused of often seeing an imitation where there is none, no com- RESIDENCE AT HORTON. 19 ii,] mentary can point out the ever-present infusion of clas- sical flavour, which bespeaks intimate converse far more than direct adaptation. Milton’s classical allusions, says Hartley Coleridge, are amalgamated and consubstantiated with his native thought. A commonplace book of Milton’s, after having lurked unsuspected for 200 years in the archives of Netherby, has been disinterred in our own day (1874). It appears to belong partly to the end of the Horton period. It is not by any means an account of all that he is reading, but only an arrangement, under certain heads, or places of memoranda for future use. These notes are extracted from about eighty different authors, Greek, Latin, French, Italian, and English. Of Greek authors no less than sixteen are quoted. The notes are mostly notes of his- torical facts, seldom of thoughts, never of mere verbal expression. There is no trace in it of any intention to store up either the imagery or the language of poetry. It may be that such notes were made and entered in another volume ; for the book thus accidentally preserved to us seems to refer to other similar volumes of collections. But it is more likely that no such poetical memoranda were ever made, and that Milton trusted entirely to memory for the wealth of classical allusion with which his verse is surcharged. He did not extract from the poets and tire great writers whom he was daily turning over, but only from the inferior authors and secondary historians, which he read only once. Most of the material collected in the commonplace book is used in his prose pamphlets. But when so employed the facts are worked into the texture of his argument, rather than cited as extraneous witnesses. In reading history it was his aim to get at a conspectus of 20 FrRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [chap, the general current of affairs rather than to study minutely a special period. He tells Diodati in September, 1637, that he has studied Greek history continuously, from the beginning to the fall of Constantinople. When he tells the same friend that he has been long involved in the obscurity of the early middle ages of Italian History down to the time of the Emperor Rudolph, we learn from the commonplace book that he had only been reading the one volume of Sigonius’s Hist aria Regni Italici. From the thirteenth century downwards he proposes to himself to study each Italian state in some separate history. Even before his journey to Italy he read Italian with as much ease as French. He tells us that it was by his father's ad- vice that he had acquired these modern languages. But we can see that they were essential parts of his own scheme of self-education, which included, in another direction, Hebrew, both Biblical and Rabbinical, and even Syriac. The intensity of his nature showed itself in his method of study. He read, not desultorily, a bit here and another there, but “when I take up with a thing, I never pause or break it off, nor am drawn away from it by any other interest, till I have arrived at the goal I proposed to myself.” He made breaks occasionally in this routine of study by visits to London, to see friends, to buy books, to take lessons in mathematics, to go to the theatre, or to concerts. A love of music was inherited from his father. I have c all ed this period, 1632-39, one of preparati on and_not of production. But though the first volume of poems printed by Milton did not appear till 1645, the most considerable part of its contents was written during the period included in the present chapter. The fame of the author of Paradise Lost has over- «■] COMUS. 21 shadowed that of the author of L’ Allegro, 11 Penseroso , and Lycidas . Yet had Paradise Lost never been written, these three poems, with Comus, would have sufficed to place their author in a class apart, and above all those who had used the English language for poetical purposes before him. It is incumbent on Milton’s bio- grapher to relate the circumstances of the composition of Comus , as it is an incident in the life of the poet. Milton’s musical tastes had brought him the acquain- tance of Henry Lawes, at that time the most celebrated composer in England. When the Earl of Bridgewater would give an entertainment at Ludlow Castle to celebrate his entry upon his office as President of Wales and the Marches, it was to Lawes that application was made to furnish the music. Lawes, as naturally, applied to his young poetical acquaintance Milton, to write the words. The entertainment was to be of that sort which was fashionable at court, and was called a Mask. In that brilliant period of court life which was inaugurated by Elisabeth and put an end to by the Civil War, a Mask was a frequent and favourite amusement. It was an exhibition in which pageantry and music predominated, but in which dialogue was introduced as accompaniment or explanation. The dramatic Mask of the sixteenth century has been traced by the antiquaries as far back as the time of Edward III. But in its perfected shape it was a genuine offspring of the English renaissance, a cross between the vernacular mummery, or mystery-play, and the Greek drama. JSTo great court festival was considered complete without such a public show. Many of our great dramatic writers, Beaumont, Fletcher, Ben Jonson, Middleton, Dekker, Shirley, Carew, were constrained by the fashion 22 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [chap of the time to apply their invention to gratify this taste for decorative representation. No less an artist than Inigo Jones must occasionally stoop to construct the machinery. The taste for grotesque pageant in the open air must have gradually died out before the general advance of refinement. The Mask by a process of evolution would have become the Opera. But it often happens that when a taste or fashion is at the point of death, it undergoes a forced and temporary revival. So it was with the Mask. In 1633, the Puritan hatred to the theatre had blazed out in Prynne’s Histriomastix , and as a natural consequence, the loyal and cavalier portion of society threw itself into dramatic amusements of every kind It was an unreal revival of the Mask, stimulated by political passion, in the wane of genuine taste for the fantastic and semi-barbarous pageant, in which the former age had delighted. What the imagination of the specta- tors was no longer equal to, was to be supplied by costli- ness of dress and scenery. These last representations of the expiring Mask were the occasions of an extravagant outlay. The Inns of Court and Whitehall vied with each other in the splendour and solemnity with which they brought out,— the Lawyers, Shirley’s Triumph of Peace , — the Court, Carew’s Caelum Britannicum. It was a strange caprice of fortune that made the future poet of the Puritan epic the last composer of a cavalier mask. The slight plot, or story, of Comus was probably suggested to Milton by his recollection of George Peele’s Otd Wives 7 Tale , which he may have seen on the stage. The personage of Comus was borrowed from a Latin extravaganza by a Dutch professor, whose Comm was reprinted at Oxford in 1634, the very year in which COMUS. 2o Lt.j Milton wrote his Mask . The so-called tradition col* lected by Oldys, of the young Egertons, who acted in Comus , haying lost themselves in Haywood Forest on their way to Ludlow, obviously grew out of Milton’s poem. However casual the suggestion, or unpromising the occasion, Milton worked out of it a strain of poetry such as had never been heard in England before. If any reader wishes to realise the immense step upon what had gone before him, which was now made by a young man of twenty-seven, he should turn over some of the most celebrated of the masks of the Jacobean period. We have no information how Comas was received when represented at Ludlow, but it found a ptiblic of readers. For Lawes, who had the MS. in his hands, was so importuned for copies that, in 1637, he caused an edition to be printed off. Hot surreptitiously ; for though Lawes does not say, in the dedication to Lord Brackley, that he had the author’s leave to print, we are sure that he had it, only from the motto. On the title page of this edition (1637), is the line,— Eiieu ! quid volui miser o mihi ! floribus austrum Perditu3 — The words are Virgil’s, but the appropriation of them, and their application in this “ second intention” is too exquisite to have been made by any but Milton. To the poems of the Horton period belong also the two pieces II Allegro and II Penseroso , and Lycidas . He was probably in the early stage of acquiring the language, when he superscribed the two first poems with their Italian titles. For there is no such word as “ Penseroso,” the adjective formed from “Pensiero ” being “pensieroso.” Even had the word been written correctly, its significa- 24 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [chap. tion is not that which Milton intended, viz. thoughtful, or contemplative, but anxious, full of cares, cark- ing. The rapid purification of Milton’s taste will be best perceived by comparing LI Allegro and II Pense- roso of uncertain date, but written after 1632, with the Ode on the Nativity , written 1629. The Ode, not- withstanding its foretaste of Milton’s grandeur, abounds in frigid conceits, from which the two later pieces are free. TJheOde is frosty, as written in winter, within the four walls of a college chamber. Th^woTdyH s brea the tii^lrefilur of spring^and^summer, and of the fields round Horton. 'They are ' thoroughly' hliim^ expression our language has yet found of the fresh charm of country life, not as that life is lived by the peasant, but as it is felt by a young and lettered student, issuing at early dawn, or at sunset, into the fields from his chamber and his books. All rural sights and sounds and smells are here blended in that ineffable combination, which once or twice perhaps in our lives has saluted our young senses before their perceptions were blunted by alcohol, by lust, or ambition, or diluted by the social distractions of great cities. The fidelity to nature of the imagery of these poems has been impugned by the critics. Then to come, in spite of sorrow, And at my window bid good morrow. The skylark never approaches human habitations in this way, as the redbreast does. Mr. Masson replies that the subject of the verb “to come” is, not the skylark, but 1/ Allegro, the joyous student. I cannot construe the lines as Mr. Masson does, even though the consequence were to convict Milton, a city-bred youth, of not knowing a skylark from a sparrow when he saw it. A close observer of things around us would not speak of the II.] L’ ALLEGRO AND IL PENSEROSO. 26 eglantine as twisted, of the cowslip as wan, of the violet as glowing, or of the reed as balmy. Lyonias’ laureate hearse is to be strewn at once with primrose and woodbine, daffodil and jasmine. When we read “the rathe primrose that forsaken dies/’ we see that the poet is recollecting Shakespeare (Winter’s Tale, 4. 4), not looking at the primrose. The pine is not “ rooted deep as high” (P. B. 4416), but sends its roots along the surface. The elm, one of the thinnest foliaged trees of the forest, is inappropriately named starproof (Arc. 89). Lightning does not singe the tops of trees (P. L. i. 613), but either shivers them, or cuts a groove down the stem to the ground. These and other such like inaccuracies must be set down partly to conventional language used without meaning, the vice of Latin versification enforced as a task, but they are partly due to real defect of natural knowledge. Other objections of the critics on the same score, which may be met with, are easily dismissed. The objector, who can discover no reason why the oak should be styled “ monumental,” meets with his match in the defender who suggests, that it may be rightly so called because monuments in churches are made of oak. I should tremble to have to offer an explanation to critics of Milton so acute as these two. But of less ingenious readers I would ask, if any single word can be found equal to “ monumental ” in its power of suggesting to the imagination the historic oak of park or chase, up to the knees in fern, which has outlasted ten generations of men ; has been the mute witness of the scenes of love, treachery, or violence enacted in the baronial hall which it shadows and protects ; and has been so associated with man, that it is now rather a column and memorial obelisk than a tree of the forest ? 26 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [CHAK These are the humours of criticism. But, apart from these, a naturalist is at once aware that Milton had neither the eye nor the ear of a naturalist. At-iuijd? 16 ? even before his loss of sight, was he an exact observer of natural ol)j ects^^ he knew a skylark from a redbreast, and did not confound the dog-rose with the honeysuckle. But I am sure that he had never acquired that interest in nature’s things and ways, which leads to close and loving watching of them. He had not that sense of outdoor nature, empirical and not scientific, which endows the Angler of his cotemporary Walton, with its enduring charm, and which is to be acquired only by living in the open country in childhood. Milt on is not a man of the fields, but of books. His l ife is in His study, and whehHfre ^BtSps^broad^^nto the air he carmT^ him. He does look at na^u?ep4ait^ through books. Natural im- pressions are received from without, but always in those forms of beautiful speech, in which the poets of all ages have clothed them. His epithets are not, like the epithets of the school of Dryden and Pope, culled from the Gradus ad Parnassum ; they are expressive of some reality, but it is of a real emotion in the spectator’s soul, not of any quality detected by keen insight in the objects themselves. This emotion Milton’s art stamps with an epithet, which shall convey the added charm of classical reminiscence. When, e.g., he speaks of “ the wand’ring moon,” the original significance of the epithet comes home to the scholarly reader with the enhanced effect of its association with the “ errantem lunam ” of VirgiL Nor because it is adopted from Virgil has the epithet here the second- hand effect of a copy. If Milton sees nature through books, he still sees it* «•] L’ ALLEGRO AND IL PENSEROSO. 27 To behold the waud’rrng moon, Riding near her highest noon, Like one that had been led astray, Through the heaven’s wide pathless way, And oft, as if her head she bow’d. Stooping through a fleecy clouc No allegation that “ wand’ring moon i» uorrowed from Horace can hide from us that Milton, though he remem- bered Horace, had watched the phenomenon with a feel- ing so intense that he projected his own soul’s throb into the object before him, and named it with what Thomson calls “ recollected love.” Milton’s attitude towards nature is not that of a scien- tific naturalist, nor even thatofiA close observer. It is that of a poet who feels its total influence too powerfully to dissect it. If, as I have laid, Milton reads hooks first and nature afterwards, it is not to test nature by his books, but to learn from both. He is learning not books, but from books. All he reads, sees, hears, is to him but nutriment for the soul. He is making himself. Man is to him the highest object ; nature is subordinate to man, not only in its more vulgar uses, but as an excitant of fine emotion. He 'is not concerned to register the facts and phenomena of nature, but to convey the impressions they make on a sensitive soul. The external forms of things are to be presented to us as transformed through the heart and mind of the poet. The moon is endowed with life and will, “ stooping,” “ riding,” “wand’ring,” “bowing her head,” not as a frigid personification, and because the ancient poets so personified her, but by com- munication to her of the intense agitation which the nocturnal spectacle rouses in the poet’s own breast. I have sometimes read that these two idylls are “ mas- 28 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [CHAP. terpieces of description. ” Other critics will ask if in the scenery of V Allegro and II Penseroso Milton has described the country about Horton, in Bucks, or that about Forest Hill, in Oxfordshire ; and will object that the Chiltern Hills are not high enough for clouds to rest upon their top, much less upon their breast. But he has left out the pollard willows, says another censor, and the lines of pollard willow are the prominent feature in the valley of the Colne, even more so than the “ hedgerow elms.” Does the line “ Walk the studious cloister’s pale,” mean St. Paul’s or Westminster Abbey 1 When these things can continue to be asked, it is hardly superfluous to continue to repeat, that truth of fact and poetical truth are two different things. Milton’s attitude towards nature is not that of a “ descriptive poet/’ if indeed the phrase be not a self-contradiction. In Milton, nature is not put forward as the poet’s theme. His theme is man, in the two contras ted moo ds of jo yous emotion, or grave reflection The shifting scenery ministers to the varying mood. Thomson, in the Sea- sons (1726), sets himself to render natural phenomena as they truly are. He has left us a vivid presentation in gorgeous language of the naturalistic calendar of the changing year. Milton, in these two idylls, has recorded a day of twenty-four hours. But he has not registered the phenomena ; he places us at the standpoint of the man before whom they deploy. And the man, joyous or melancholy, is not a bare spectator of them; he is the student, compounded of sensibility and intelligence, of whom we are not told that he saw so and so, or that he felt so, but with whom we are made copartners of his thoughts and feeling. Description melts into emotion, and contemplation bodies itself in imagery. All the II.] LYCIDAS. 29 charm of rural life is there, hut it is not tendered to us in the form of a landscape ; the scenery is subordinated to the human figure in the centre. These two short idylls are marked by a gladsome spon- taneity which never came to Milton again. The delicate fancy and feeling which play about L Allegro and II Penseroso never reappear, and form a strong contrast to the austere imaginings of his later poetical period. These two poems have the freedom and frolic, the natural grace of movement, the improvisation, of the best Elizabethan examples, while both thoughts and words are under a strict economy unknown to the diffuse exuberance of the Spenserians. In Lycidas (1637) we have reached the high-water mark of English Poesy and of Milton’s own production. A period of a century and a half was to elapse before poetry in England seemed, in Wordsworth’s Ode on Im- mortality (1807), to be rising again towards the level of inspiration which it had once attained in Lycidas . And in the development of the Miltonic genius this wonderful dirge marks the culminating point. As the twin idylls of 1632 show a great advance upon the OdG on the Nativity (1629), the growth of the poetic mind during the five years which follow 1632 is registered in Lycidas. Like the L Allegro and II Penseroso , Lycidas is laid out on the lines of the accepted pastoral fiction ; like them it offers exquisite touches of idealised rural life. But Lycidas opens up a deeper vein of feeling, a patriot passion so vehement and dangerous, that, like that which stirred the Hebrew prophet, it is compelled to veil itself from power, or from sympathy, in utterance made purposely enigmatical. The passage which begins “ Last came and last did go,” raises in us a thrill of 30 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [chap, awe-struck expectation which I can only compare with that excited by the Cassandra of iEschylus’s Agamem- non. For the reader to feel this, he must have present in memory the circumstances of England in 1637. He must place himself as far as possible in the situation of a cotemporary. The study of Milton’s poetry compels the study of his time; and Professor Masson’s six volumes are not too much to enable us to understand that there were real causes for the intense passion which glows underneath the poet’s words — a passion which unex- plained would be thought to be intrusive. The historical exposition must be gathered from the English history of the period, which may be read in Professor Masson’s excellent summary. All I desire to point out here is, that in Lycidas , Milton’s original pic- turesque vein is for the first time crossed with one of quite another sort, stern, determined, obscurely indicative of suppressed passion, and the resolution to do or die. The fanaticism of the covenanter and the sad grace of Petrarch seem to meet in Milton’s monody. Yet these opposites, instead of neutralising each other, are blended into one harmonious whole by the presiding, but invisible, genius of the poet. The conflict between the old cavalier world — the years of gaiety and festivity of a splendid and pleasure-loving court, and the new puritan world into which love and pleasure were not to enter — this conflict which was commencing in the social life of England, is also begun in Milton’s own breast, and is reflected in Lycidas. For we were nurs’d upon the self-same hilL Here is the sweet mournfulness of the Spenserian time, upon whose joys Death is the only intruder. Pass on- a.] LYCIDA8. 31 ward a little, and you are in presence of the tremendous Two-handed engine at the door, the terror of which is enhanced by its obscurity. We are very sure that the avenger is there, though we know not who he is. In these thirty lines we have the pre- luding mutterings of the storm which was to sweep away mask and revel and song, to inhibit the drama, and suppress poetry. In the earlier poems Milton’s muse has sung in the tones of the age that is passing away ; the poet is, except in his austere chastity, a cavalier. Though even in JO. Allegro Dr. Johnson truly detects **some melancholy in his mirth,” In Lycidas , for a moment, the tones of both ages, the past and the coming, are combined, and then Milton leaves behind him for ever the golden age, and one half of his poetic genius. He never ful- filled the promise with which Lycidas concludes* “ Ta morrow to fresh woods and pastures new,” CHAPTER IIL JOURNEY TO ITALY. Before 1632 Milton had begun to learn Italian. His mind, just then open on all sides to impressions from books, was peculiarly attracted by Italian poetry. The language grew to be loved for its own sake. Saturated as he was with Dante and Petrarch, Tasso and Ariosto, the desire arose to let the ear drink in the music of Tuscan speech. The “ unhappy gift of beauty/’ which has attracted the spoiler of all ages to the Italian peninsula, has ever exerted, and still exerts, a magnetic force on every cultivated mind. Manifold are the sources of this fascination now. The scholar and the artist, the antiquarian and the historian, the architect and the lover of natural scenery, alike find here the amplest gratification of their tastes. This is so still ; but in the sixteenth century the Italian cities were the only homes of an ancient and decaying civilization. Not insensible to other impressions, it was specially the desire of social converse with the living poets and men of taste — a feeble generation, but one still nourishing the traditions of the great poetic age — which drew Milton across the Alps. In April, 1637, Milton’s mother had diedj_butAua CH. III.] JOURNEY TO ITALY. 33 younger brother, Christopher, had come to live, with his wife, in the paternal home at Horton. Milton, the father, was not unwilling that his son should have h is foreign tour, as a part of that elab orate education by which he was qualifying himself for his doubtful vocation, j The cost “waiTnot to standTn the way, coniidmibleas it must have been. Howell’s estimate, in his Instructions for Forreine Travel , 1642, was 300Z. a year for the tourist himself, and 60Z. for his man, a sum equal to about 1000/. at present. Among the letters of introduction with which Milton provided himself, one was from the aged Sir Henry Wotton, Provost of Eton, in Milton’s immediate neigh- bourhood. Sir Henry, who had lived a long time in Italy, impressed upon his young friend the importance of discretion on the point of religion, and told him the story which he always told to travellers who asked his advice. r< At Siena I was tabled in the house of one Alberto Scipioni, an old Eoman courtier in dangerous times At my departure for Eome I had won confidence enough to beg his advice ho.w I might carry myself securely there, without offence of others, or of mine own conscience. ‘ Signor Arrigo mio,’ says he, ‘ pensieri stretti ed il viso sciolto (thoughts close, countenance open) will go safely over the whole world.’” Though the intensity of the Catholic reaction had somewhat relaxed in Italy, the deportment of a Protestant in the countries which were terrorised by the Inquisition was a matter which demanded much circumspection. Sir H. Wotton spoke from his own experience of far more rigorous times than those of the Barberini Pope. But he may have noticed, even in his brief acquaintance with Milton, a fearless presumption of speech which was just what was most likely to bring D 84 FIRST PERIOD. 1608-1639- tohap him into trouble. The event proved that the hint wa* replied that he was a Catholic, which, in a Laudian, was but a natural equivoque. Milton was resol ute in his >me f so muc h s o that many were deterre d oiler. M is rule, he says, was “ notTof my own accord to introduce in those places conversation about religion, but, should suffer, to dissemble nothing. What I was, if any one asked, I concealed from no one ; if any one in the very city of the Pope attacked the orthodox religion, I defended it most freely.” Beyond the statement that the English Jesuits were indignant, we hear of no evil con- sequences of this imprudence. Perhaps the Jesuits saw that Milton was of the stuff that would welcome mar- tyrdom, and were sick of the affair of Galileo, which had terribly damaged the pretensions of their church. Milton arrived in Paris April or May, 1638.^ . He received* civilities from the English ambassador, Lord Scudamore, who at his request gave him an introduction to Grotius. Grotius, says Phillips, “ took Milton's visit kindly, and gave him entertainment suitable to his worth, and the high commendations he had heard of him.” We have no other record of his stay of many days in Paris, though A. Wood supposes that “the manners and graces of that place were not agreeable to his mind.” It was August before he reached Florence, by way of Nice and Genoa, and in Florence he spent the two months which we now consider the most impossible there, the months not misplaced. For at Borne itself, in the very, lion's ■om showing him the civilities they were prepared to if interrogated respecting the faith, then, whatsoever I JOURNEY TO ITALY. 86 of August and September. Nor did he find, as he would find now, the city deserted by the natives. We hear nothing of Milton’s impressions of the place, but of the men whom he met there he retained always a lively and affectionate remembrance. The learned and polite Florentines had not fled to the hills from the stifling heat and blinding glare of the Lung’ Arno, but seem to have carried on their literary meetings in defiance of climate. This was the age of academies — an institution, Milton says, “ of most praiseworthy effect, both for the cultivation of polite letters and the keeping up of friendships.” Florence had five or six such societies, the Florentine, the Della Crusca, the Svogliati, the Apotisti, &c. It is easy, and usual in our day, to speak contemptuously of the literary tone of these academies, fostering, as they did, an amiable and garrulous intercourse of reciprocal compli- ment, and to contrast them unfavourably with our societies for severe research. They were at least evidence of culture, and served to keep alive the traditions of the more masculine Medicean age. And that the members of these associations were not unaware of their own degene- racy and of its cause, we learn from Milton himself. For, as soo n as they foun d that they were safe with the young * t hey,, h ad to bear. U J L have sate among their learned men,” Milton wrote in 1644, “and been counted happy to be born in such a place of philo- sophic freedom as they supposed England was, while themselves did nothing but bemoan the servile condition into which learning amongst them was brought, that this was it which had dampt the glory of Italian wits, that nothing had been written there now these many years but flattery and fustian.” Milton was introduced 4h^h^owiu bitter hatred of the 38 FIRST PERIOD. 160R-1689. [CHAP, lit the meetings of their academies ; his presence is re- corded on two occasions, of which the latest is the 16 th September at the Svogliati. He paid his scot by reciting from memory some of his youthful Latin verses, hexa- meters, “molto erudite,” says the minute-book of the sitting, and others, which “ I shifted, in the scarcity of books and conveniences, to patch up.” He obtained much credit by these exercises, which, indeed, deserved it by comparison. He ventured upon the perilous experiment of offering some compositions in Italian, which the fas- tidious Tuscan ear at least professed to include in those “ encomiums which the Italian is not forward to bestow on men of this side the Alps.” The author of Lycidas cannot but have been quite aware of the small poetical merit of such an ode as that which was addressed to him by Francini In this ode Milton is the swan of Thames — “ Thames, which, owing to thee, rivals Boeotian Permessus ;” and so forth. But there is a genuine feeling, an ungrudging warmth of sympathetic recognition underlying the trite and tumid panegyric. And Milton may have yielded to the not unnatural impulse of showing his countrymen, that though not a prophet in boorish and fanatical England, he had found recognition in the home of letters and arts. Upon us is forced, by this their different reception of Milton, the contrast between the two countries, Italy and England, in the middle of the seventeenth century. The rude north, whose civilisation was all to come, concentrating all its intelligence in a violent effort to work off the eccle- siastical poison from its system, is brought into sharp con- trast with the sweet south, whose civilisation is behind it, and whose intellect, after a severe struggle, has succumbed to the material force and organisation of the church. III.] JOURNEY TO ITALY. 37 As soon as the season allowed of it, Milton set forward fco Eome, taking what was then the usual way by Siena. At Rome he spent t wo months, occupying himself partly with seeing the antiquities, and partly with cultivating the acquaintance of natives, and some of the many foreigners resident in the eternal city. But though he received much civility, we do not find that he met with the peculiar sympathy which endeared to him his Tuscan friends. His chief ally was the German, Lucas Holstenius, a native of Hamburg, who had abjured Protestantism to become librarian of the Vatican. Holstenius had resided three years in Oxford, and considered himself bound to repay to the English scholar some of the attentions he had received himself. Through Holstenius Milton was presented to the nephew, Francesco Barberini, who was just then everything in Rome. It was at a concert at the Barberini palace that Milton heard Leonora Baroni sing. His three Latin epigrams addressed to this lady, the first singer of Italy, or of the world at that time, testify to the enthusiasm she excited in the musical soul of Milton. Hor are these three epigrams the only homage which Milton paid to Italian beauty. The susceptible poet, who in the sunless north would fain have “sported with the tangles of FTesera’s hair,” could not behold Heaera herself and the hashing splendour of her eye, unmoved. Milton proclaims ( Defensio Secunda) that in all his foreign tour he had lived clear from all that is disgraceful. But the pudicity of his behaviour and language covers a soul tremulous with emotion, whose passion was intensified by the disci- pline of a chaste intention. Five Italian pieces among his poems are to the address of another lady, whose “majestic movements and love- darting dark brow ” had subdued him. The charm lay in the novelty of this style 38 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. [chap of beauty to one who came from the land of the “vermeil* tinctur'd cheek ” (Comus) and the “ golden nets of hair ” {El. i. 60). No clue has been discovered to the name of this divinity, or to the occasion on which Milton saw her. Of Milton's impression of Eome there is no record . There are no tra ces of special observatio n in his , poetry. The descriptionof the city in Paradise Regained (iv. 32) has nothing characteristic, and could have been written by one who had never seen it, and by many as well as by Milton. We get one glimpse of him by aid of the register of the English College, as dining there at a “ sumptuous entertainment ” on 30th October, when he met Nicholas Carey, brother of Lord Falkland. In spite of Sir Henry Wotton's caution, his resoluteness, as A. Wood calls it, in his religion, besides making the English Jesuits indignant, caused others, not Jesuits, to withhold civilities. Milton only tells us himself that the anti- quities detained him in Rome about two months. At the end of November he went on to Naples. On the road he fell in with an Eremite friar, who gave him an introduction to the one man in Naples whom it was im- portant he should know, Giovanni Battista Manso, Marquis of Villa. The marquis, now seventy- eight, had been for two generations the Maecenas of letters in Southern Italy. He had sheltered Tasso in the former generation, and Marini in the latter. It was the singular privilege of his old age that he should now entertain a third poet, greater than either. In spite of his years, he was able to act as cicerone to the young Englishman over the scenes which he himself, in hi3 Life of Tasso , has described with the enthusiasm of a poet. But even the high-souled Manso quailed before the terrors of the In- III.] JOURNEY TO ITALY. 39 quisition, and apologised to Milton for not having shown him greater attention, because he would not be more circumspect in the matter of religion. Milton’s Ita lian journey brings out the two conflicting strains of feeling , wlnch_ were uttered together in Lycidas , the poet’s inn possibility by nature, the freeman’s indignation at clerical domination. The time was now at hand when the latter passion, the noble rage of freedom, was to suppress the more delicate flower of poetic imagination. Milton’s original scheme had included Sicily and Greece. The serious aspect of affairs at home compelled him to renounce his project. “ I considered it dishonourable to be enjoying myself at my ease in foreign lands, while my countrymen were striking a blow for freedom.” _He^_retraced his steps leisurely eno ugh, however, making a halt of two months in Rome, and again one of two months in Florence. We find him mentioned in the minutes of the academy of the Svogliati as having been present at three of their weekly meetings, on the 17th, 24th, and 31st March. Rut the most noteworthy incident of his second Florentine residence is his interview with Galileo. He had been unable to see the veteran martyr Ilf Science on his first visit. For though Galileo was at that time living within the walls, he was kept a close prisoner by the Inquisition, and not allowed either to set foot outside his own door, or to receive visits from non- Catholics. In the spring of 1639, however, he was allowed to go back to his villa at Gioiello, near Arcetri, and Milton obtained admission to him, old, frail, and blind, but in full possession of his mental faculty. There is observable in Milton, as Mr. Masson suggests, a pro- phetic fascination of the fancy on the subject of blind* 40 FIRST PERIOD. 1608—1639. l_OHAP, ness. And the deep impression left by this sight of u the Tuscan artist ” is evidenced by the feeling with which Galileo’s name and achievement are imbedded in Paradise Lost . Ei^om JlQxence^ Milton crossed the Apennines by Bo- logna and Ferrara to Venice. From this port he shipped for England the books he had collected during his tour, books curious and rare as they seemed to Phillips, and among them a chest or two of choice music books. The month of April was spent at Venice, and bidding farewell to the beloved land he would never visit again, Milton passed the Alps to Geneva. No Englishman’s foreign pilgrimage was complete with- out touching at this marvellous capital of the reformed faith, which with almost no resources had successfully braved the whole might of the Catholic reaction. The only record of Milton’s stay at Geneva is the album of a Neapolitan refugee, to which Milton contributed his autograph, under date 10th June, 1639, with the follow- ing quotation If virtue feeble were, Heaven itself would stoop to her. (From Comus ). Coelum non animum muto, dum trans mare curro. (From Horace.) But it is probable that he was a guest in the house of one of the leading pastors, Giovanni Diodati, whose nephew Charles, a physician commencing practice in London, was Milton’s bosom friend. Here Milton first heard of the death, in the previous August, of that friend. It was a heavy blow to him, for one of the chief plea- sures of being at home again would have been to poui 1 , 1 .] JOURNEY TO ITALY. 41 into a sympathetic Italian ear the story of his adventures. The sadness of the homeward journey from Geneva is recorded for us in the Epitaphium Damonis. This piece is an elegy to the memory of Charles Diodati. It unfortunately differs from the elegy on King in being written in Latin, and is thus inaccessible to uneducated readers. As to such readers the topic of Milton’s Latin poetry is necessarily an ungrateful subject, I will dismiss it here with one remark. Milton’s Latin verses are dis- tinguished from most Heo-latin verse by being a vehicle of real emotion. His technical skill is said to have been surpassed by others ; but that in which he stands alone is, that in these exercises of imitative art he is able to remain himself, and to give utterance to genuine passion. Artificial Arcadianism is as much the frame-work of the elegy on Diodati as it is of Lycidas. We have Daphnis and Bion, Tityrus and Amyntas for characters, Sicilian valleys for scenery, while Pan, Pales, and the Fauna represent the supernatural. The shepherds defend their flocks from wolves and lions. But this factitious buco- licism is pervaded by a pathos, which, like volcanic heat, has fused into a new compound the dilapidated debris of the Theocritean world. And in the Latin elegy there is more tenderness than in the English. Charles Diodati was much nearer to Milton than had been Edward King. The sorrow in Lycidas is not so much personal as it is the regret of the society of Christ’s. King had only been known to Milton as one of the students of the same college ; Diodati was the associate of his choice in riper manhood. The Epitaphium Damonis is further memorable as Milton’s last attempt in serious Latin verse. He dis- covered in this experiment that Latin was not an adequate u FIRST PERIOD. 1608-1639. [ch. in. vehicle of the feeling he desired to give vent to. In the concluding lines he takes a formal farewell of the Latian muse, and announces his purpose of adopting henceforth the “ harsh and grating Brittonic. idiom %y (Britt onicum stridm$\ SECOND PERIOD . 1640—1660. CHAPTEB IY. EDUCATIONAL THEORY — TEACHING. Milton was back in England in August, 1639. He had been absent a year and three months, during which space of time the aspect of public affairs, which had been per- plexed and gloomy when he left, had been growing stilP^ more ominous of a coming storm. The issues of the con- troversy were so pervasive, that it was almost impossible for any educated man who understood them not to range himself on a side. # Yet Milton, though he had broken off his projected tour in consequence, did not rush into th &. fray on his return. He resumed his retired and studious life, ~