V. • ' L16I— H4I LEIGH HUNT AS ESSAYIST AND CRITIC BY ALBERT FRANCIS TRAMS A. B. University of Illinois 1905 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ENGLISH IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, 1922 URBANA, ILLINOIS iXfWl aiDJ'ts.fj^ ?io y t'^BH'aviviu^x^ ^ ' Iroo^oe $iAi/iTi5LH» • mr • ■'j' v^- •'■'ii:>. '•'"T“^7 ■■' .s - ■',.' 0 : 'i/, Ji{u> ' >; M^rt.^ 't i :ar a., ‘•ix fii fX3itr- ^ ■ ^ >1 ‘ ' ‘ -r * r<; ‘ '.‘r ''»■■ - • **‘A , ' ,'^'^*V->J^4' ‘ ,0 .— y . r,mm 7Wr ^ A ‘? : ’ •IS. l’''ai' 4.' :l/.4l/ i;»»vp»:{.‘‘ Ihl -V ix/n ^!/ h -V ' a* a,^', *'K ,. , .t-"' > 4r.> .'ii*r;«(:Via i>JSlH^'‘'v>:a 'y, 1 I'^w -*:r,V'wv. :'i;;,v^ ■ ;/ 7 » ♦ * h .* .. j \ ' ;:'5«ai ‘ , A >3 0‘ ■ 'fji^ . f* , ( '"■ ■ < .IMB ‘If *- , *■, • .;. I V ■ >',■'■ ' ■ - < M . . •i‘ iiw* ■’ ' i. ^ ^ -» -■ > ™^HE i , •*'''. y ' , f ;‘w; ' wi v. . v . v ..,» . ■ - V.^ ’IS£??£^ / t! 'JlSS ' ' f : M ^-iTC - .. p • '■■ ■ . Wf * v «|| PREFACE We who have no stomach for the "defeatist'* idea of life as por- trayed in many books current today, passing tomorrow, and extinct the day after, may find pleasant relief in the life and writings of Leigh Hunt. After hutlerizing. Mastersizing, and Anders oni zing suf- ficiently to satisfy ourselves that we have come short of the glory of making ourselves smug, not because we have sinned too much, but because we have not sinned wickedly, grossly, nor enough, we may flush the castor-oil effects from our palates with tne tonic Hunt- ian remedy against the "All is well that ends ill." Then, whether at work or at play in the world of literature and life, we shall, I am sure we will, decide that there is neither pleasure nor profit in spending all our time with weeds and stones, with worms, and thorns, and poison ivy. Flowers shall sometimes lure our feet down field-paths growing dusky in the distance; birds calling to birds will quicken memories of old haunts far down in the twilight of forest glades; forgotten gateways will invite us to the Burial-grounds of Genius overhung with quietness and the peace of the Past. Thorn-prick and stone-bruise will undoubtedly be ours along the way, but only because we are unwary. They are but accidents by the way. Happiness, however, is not accident, nei- ther is content; they, and comfort, will come only in the wake of striving and serving. All these came to Hunt because ne strove and served. He had his share of thorn-prick and stone-bruise, for he too was unwary. But his largest portion by far was happiness, and Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/leighhuntasessayOOtram ii content, and comfort; for he had the rare mind, the sweet soul, the striving spirit. And to him who comes asking he will reveal the secret of his own satisfaction. Leigh Hunt as a subject for investigation was first suggested to me by Professor Stuart p. Sherman of the University of Illinois, 1 have him to thank for the pleasure that has come to me as a re- sult of my study. For helpful suggestions during the early stages of the work I am indebted to Professors H. S. V. Jones and Harry 0. Paul, also of the University of Illinois. I wish also to ack- nowledge my indebtedness to Miss Mary Spangler, librarian of the Joliet Township High School for reading the entire manuscript. 1 am especially glad to record my gratitude to Luther A. Brew- er of Cedar Bapids, Iowa, for his kindness in giving me much side- light information about Leigh Hunt, and for allowing me to examine, and to make use of many rare volumes, and both published and unpub- lished manuscripts of Leigh Hunt. Several of the most interesting of these I have described in the addendum. Joliet, Illinois May 10, 1922 l‘1 ra ! , ;■» • ,;i ,|qv-i J«#»« ,>aln *^5"^ ♦* ^ 4 ri l»*tofe :< l«Tit lOl * a» ffauft .j/oallXI 10 to aiitiorfC inaaJ l^iB»eioV^ X<* c ■ ' --^ ^ ' *i I ' -r>i a «A ¥ta fi i 9000 ooii loki mrittontoi^ od^ tot iCaaiti of 4 ilo '.-V i f 4 | fcturlj feoif*o®'S«t lot^l^oA tot ta.X 0 ’ 4 lB« .1^. / ' - t ' tea ,t .a »B a-ioaaotoi^ oi 6 « 4 d# 4 >n| ut« i dt&w otfi'glO * ^ . w' - [ vBf'^' -Ito* 04 ObU *ul* I ♦a'faflUrl to i« o^ata ,Xai'| ; , ’• ' . ‘ ■ ■ '^ . . . • '>-v ., BiCf 1o uMlrstdU p%atS«t»nQ V*oi «BX|t oJ o-iBftfroOflitDal %ja •^oX^oii ■* ■ 11 , •! ■ . • ::'■ “ . 4 qliOB»aaM. oiiJ ^ 0 ' Xoo 4 o 8 OfUOt. Bbolifa^B 0 -a«o#-s o^ Jt» 4 la xiidti>oq ,09 ipi X'*>^ • ♦ . 1 . 1 ' _ _^*'— ■V; r T «! -•Mb liotriB oei %altln »l ••mabA/d 9 id to f .afOi ,olt^oP -!44#9 to •*# ,«fiXa«z# o4 «f* gJiXuoXX* aol 6aa ao X *49XX I I «Cffo«4 Oaa UBdBi’XOiffl rxorf tn4 .•aicurfof \aa»i to ofu^t^OiB o^ .Ooo !< L ' -^ . V, ^ ^ mai^io-rtoM Jto*^ o4> 10 iMtovnt , raoH to 94«ton aloaS ^ixji ."iZS " ** .l.•i*tcTo^n9ltSoD «iH to OffioEl bas aoo'xl^Ao JbAB talftAit •liliM Ain *2fl to OYBiaa Mot-o«4 Bill \o \:lctt (S ham mvl^mm’to" stsoi^itw * ' * ^ as-dx :&i ■i ,* -M* . Jf ■ 'MX -y.' bSAAat a«A n^ 6 atOB .in «iB .AJooCtf^* . V4 t:i0«:cil «'4afll{ tiioaod X«%odi « 1 H ,x)mmsad Imaacmtiaial , $ama:SMlbldm bam ; 4 * , , ^ ^ ^ 10.1 a» s i t fl ' 4 ft RBOB > :• P net .•fit fd? TO «toG .•^aX.tf‘10*^ t»lop ^ ,dO* .a«nX»XXdo mltJtji .Xatttftf 9 d 2 i to' «dilX to *.«oao mmibmymq mtnw t%maxmhl Lm *'.«ao« 1 X 0 K U da.de . T '■ dAimito.^osfffio GXi 01 TI 8 O .T r.'v ■ bfc« ^tfXlt*/^* .\ 4 iX*M-j®qffli^*Haieo 4 ao 44 p .etv M «.oXyf{ .OJiMitfp latoa A ** ,'saimaiitq -tXoC ,xaiio^mlutq *if? o 4 ooiot^ a. A I ■ t ..■ l-i i i-i _L^v ■■■•,.' ^ »J|£I 1 Vv'ifclMl : ■ nft - " * D ■ „ i> f> ■ f"'' ; 4 . 1 i 'Ail IT? I iv VI. INDICATOR AND TASTER Critical and aesthetic appreciation. Imag- ination and Fancy. Critical estimates. '•What is Poetry?” Details and examples. "Wit and Humour.” ”A jewel case of crit- icisms.” Character of the two books. The conclusion. "Who still rules our spirit from his urn.” 63-78 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF BIBLIOGRAPHIES Alexander Ireland. Brimley R. Johnson. J. P. Anderson, in Monkhouse’s ”Life of Leigh Hunt.” Roger Ingpen. Additional. 79-82 LIST OF BOOKS AND OTHER ITEMS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS THESIS Books by Hunt. Biography and criticism 83-86 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF LEIGH HUNT CHRONOLOGICALLY ARRANGED 87-91 ADDENDUM 92-97 List of manuscript letters 92-93 List of manuscripts 93-94 Items with association interest 94-96 List of presentation copies 96-97 p- - mmmmtm Yi wut asu ff07A.&ia)i,x .IV' V, . -S<«iai| 6a#t XaoliltD .; . ••iaai^e# kaM atliMai .teXqeaxA i^o* •'t\:fJ#o*l «X imd"9" -ilio Ifirtt i" •‘.^aoiutfH bam /Uf* •£[T .•Kootf o»i aiii to lojoaiAilO tlvl^k too ««rIon IXiXa o4*“ .ooltjjXenao '**. tr»f*3f «lAi B*oft "" H • aOAAflOv XOXfltit^ .^aaXoxZ t»b*flOX«lA otlj** t *o«oo . j fi'*' l’ 'Iv,' I .1 f M. * ■ I • i a«cz 4 iuu '«? Vs i» lOcrnaadA fctet^sX lilioAuaMtt to 9KH «siqXta«9axs to XAXYOX{>X oolXaioosno a ^iw <'« 0 i«dii «»lqoo ao t.t«lo9»**tq to 9tX3 I LEIGH HUNT; BI0GRAPHI3AL YoutJa and education. Dramatic criticism. Editorial work. In prison. Poetical works. The '•Liberal'* and Italy. Back home. "Lord Byron and Some of His G onteraporar ies . " Fi- nancial relief. publications. Death. 1784 James Henry Leigh Hunt was born at Southgate, near London, October 19, '‘cradled," he tells us, '’not only in the lap of Nature, which I love, out in the midst of the truly Eng- lish scenery which I love beyond all other." His father was a native of Barbadoes, who, after practicing law in Philadelphia, came to London and gained a reputation as a preacher. For some time he acted as tutor to a Mr. Leigh, after whom the subject of the present study was named. The father had no more capacity to manage money affairs than his son. He went through the Bankruptcy Court, and died (1809) a poor man, at the age of fifty-seven, Leigh Hunt’s mother was the reverse of his father in character. Judged by Leigh Hunt's description, his father was a social ani- mal. His mother, he tells us, had two accomplishments: "a love of Nature and of books... She was diffident in her personal merit, but had great energy of principle." From his father he inherited the incapacity to manage money mat- ters, from his mother the capacity to make sacrifices for a principle. Dr. Samuel Johnson died, December 13.* f 'W K" fc^oj* ,v^ 4 B 64 l 0 .T 4 -11 ••. fcdl listen t*al>cO llR ^0 o.nif 3 fchii apt ^ ^ ♦ taol • t X^loyM^ ♦ ,« 4 &tao\X n*#i ,» 4 a»iiiuoa fl’Tdfl *»w th^r. ^m 4 »S ioimt tiMi •((? fll TcXno J 6 «* .ft*/ •»’-K!*,b 4 >Xl»*ti ♦* .VJl %ii^^4bQ tXulJ lo al Ite ,»vci X Itcl^w Vo nviU»”> ftXU ".laiiJo IX^ #Yot 1 ' i!els:i.i»* AiXX -• ' n itl ^ikXV^iriolioftn^ i*ltii i4« .*16. tti liin t «>» r i flaif^ioqdi i» ]>oiiiAi t*ff* oo<>A6i o# ofti*:? , siXtuilftt ailii;^ aX ^ oS 10 3V %r tP.^OS f 4 frl# f .lf» ‘ Tii >A • * «r .rhAta' bit* Yu /d#?.Cll/ft Kr ff J 2 'OitlP 1 V ^ 4 A l«jfi tL Iivt .h0p»0 Ift« fcft* lo /d#ldi/* i tlN>2 •*xl»%lii 0 ^ oxj *TCfitiF O'.ftt k l<»rw «0 .*IOH al4 ■q drUv. It) irf? .T 34 'OX.*»a*iO tX * 6 tl* * 4 l la #«■*»>'«••» AliX a' ' * -loA i®ivx>® ® tefiiftl Mfr '•I n» - T « tftXc*(rt 3 att^« 3 'r<;»cc'« o' J i .*-1 .•*» *XI®X orf ,x 4 *?>tfow, ilR .lacf •■f'd tod •! ;id* «* 6 . ..«ptOO< 1 r “s ^ 1 J '. ' • ■ , . •' I, : ^-lOCi a.^4rt| ■' w . «;::*^v • T. •. . 1 r, '. i i i vft ' •’<^.11 i. . *% *T r ' • V ■ •-....• 1 , I 1 1 . 0 '.* I t . 1 i 1 ' „ . 2 J 7 f r J . c ': •■ ■ J ■- * 1 . i.. ; xt >•!■•>' i )i , J ii "■ \* Ti»i . . . *.'* • 1 , f w m ij'l •.*.!. itJU «- '. ’* V •kf li >2 V f *k ^ » ' -k)f : . C A 1 ■■ ••It i •■-«» 3 ■' ■" . • 1 .1 . y !'■ 4» •' 3 :c tljOSltl I ■ i r. - o'. '. 0*' •• 1 / 0 •? q t '■■■ - i : •• < 1 . . . V - ' ■ ■ ' - .(fetCtfil-' IAVC./<.^Tv . ‘d 7 1 V . L. * ' . r i i 4 i ; ;' k.. ' /! 1 ...rrto *1 J Itt f.-.'k. a , • 1 ‘ • 1- .r . * i* L ' « c *. *• V r \ 1 i.i T1 (' w • t ■ - 1 • ■ i. ' ,. ( , ‘. 1 . u XI ‘ •i iV • ■ . • : •• ■ . ' •ati I ^ , ••vt* 4 ;.lk^" i»'?r<4|jj| • ,' 1. :, .«fl ■ 1 0 J i .• 1 J .. fr, i I vi-w« ; . ^ r /. 1 ' < 7«i . « i ■ «, 4 ^ ' * . ■ , 1 . ; i CiiB . if.,. -l* \ 44 i 1 - uo ^^m f#/ • ■ ‘ ‘ ft 1 r l\_ . . • ' " I '*? ^ t'.i » . -i Hi ' J ■ ■>: I ^.i# V4l *4- - - V. . • . » I ’ ^ 'i' -i* . 1 ■’, , if ’ J 0 ^ • A i«# ‘ v< ,' «• • • ' -' -C Xi t? i- L , -i t. iv • 4> if M 1. . . kC 1 J ijt .‘ J' .- ' '' T 7 '»' ; ' i '' • ' t - #>:k »• » i iO^ 7 ' r-rf', -» , , . t' i . , . . ■ . . • ' I , ' . .1 ■’ i ' 'X» i >v i . .4 I .#0 I , f'ir '■ . 1 ' »® .* *J; X i •<*'» i ’’ . I,* ‘_,i k' riC j jJ; i t j, I,' Jit.! J if,.. • ^4: f. .. -to'* If i'l-f UiTAO I Q ,.0 (•; :jt'‘ i nJaq 4 ^ ^ a*d'f ■ ^ '/r: going out of the School in the same rank« and for the same reason, as my friend Charles Lamb. The reason was that I hesitated in my speech. It was understood that a Grecian was bound to deliver a public speech before he left the School, and to go into the Church afterwards; and as I could do neither of these things, a Grecian I could not be.'* 1600 Cowper died. Macaulay was born. Joseph Warton died. 1601 Ho left shool with the purpose of spreading the pleasures of literature, of resisting tyranny, of diminishing super- stition, of writing poetry. The last of these purposes was made manifest in the publication of his first printed book, ’•Juvenilia.'* He also contributed to the '*Juvenile Library,” and to the **Suropean Magazine” he contributed a little poem called "Melancholy.” 1601-11 Contributed several poems during 1601 , 1805-11, to the '•Po- etical Register.” 1802 Contributed to "The Monthly preceptor” an article which at- tracted the attention of one, Elizabeth Kent, who asked a mutual friend, John Robertson, to introduce the author of it to her. Leigh Hunt was brought to the house, and there he met Marianne, £lizabeth*s sister, who afterwards became his wife. 1803-06 Sometime before this (nobody seems to give the date) Leigh Hunt and Marianne had fallen into a misunderstanding, and the engagement had been broken off; but through the help of Elizabeth the engagement was renewed about April, 1803. At the time of the reconciliation Leigh Hunt was clerking in his lawyer brother Stephen*s office. i T ’»■ 3 C' f^.y loX t>^n «^tfi*‘( 9 «u|« nil./ ni ttH>iipZ'9iii 10 iti7b nnXo}| : *am erif AflfoA^ * ' t a^Xctnl 4 4«f) ««iir t^4iixe«a t f 0P.J xioZ Oa /doOtq* ox Oictfod •«¥ t 44 bfUt 49^940 «4X PXiti 99 OX/^^a 4 . X bQliolS N. .•d XOB 9tJNfd>i A«IOOt0 ^ •«1AX4X \0 99 9I«00 99i9 aX0$i fc , ^ *.9#xti%«ir ipttsp -x»* 4s»i/ii<* flolinji fi;* •*xo54»0«»‘H o^' ft9XtfOt'»tfttoO M 90 rtfloJ (olot- 04; »?19 ox ba.bt)4 %.w«Xoo) *14X ot«l»o oialxoittoa $9-40®X^ •boo , 90 Xl< 04 X 0 *l*bO 0 lift o oXfli oolXol boi» oooaXtoM H>f*s ' ql#;: o4X 49.i»Q'i4i u-.J ap 4 1804- 05 While still clerking for his brother he began contributing his first prose essays to the '♦Traveller.'* All of them re-, fleeted his admired models. Goldsmith, Fielding, Smollett, and Voltaire. The essays were signed, '*Mr, Town Junior, Critic and Censor-general.'* ("Mr. Town, Critic and Censor- general" was the pen name of the authors of the "Connois- seur", one of the chipmunk magazines in imitation of the "Spectator . " ) 1805 About this time he left his brother’s office for a place in the War Office, a place secured for him by Mr. Addington. 1805- 07 While still in the War Office he began his career as theat- rical critic. There were two periods, the first from 1805 to 1813, and the second from 1830 to 183£. From 1805 to 1807 he contributed criticisms of the stage and actors to "The News," a paper set up by his brother John. These criticisms appeared in book form in 1807. 1806 John Stuart Mill was born. 1806 Sdited "Classic Tales." These were published in fifteen parts. Bound in five volumes; the first dated 1806, and the others 1807. According to Alexander Ireland, they were all dated 1807. 1807 Contributed theatrical criticisms to "The Times" (estab- lished in 1801) Hunt’s friend, Barnes became editor in 1807. 1808-21 While still at work in the War Office, he became editor of the "Examiner," the first number of which is dated January 3, 1806. In order to give his full time to his new duties he resigned his position in the War Office, December 26, The "Examiner", of which his brother John was proprietor. , 7 lo»Q ,A3 ttla ixaoxlX . ^ I .nft'ittirT, .a^iOT ft** .•ilalXoV *dA todji titjlit) .iH**) ••.l4i’iO«iBj*-‘toia«0 ifl* pIMtO J V ^ -•lonaoO" •di to aioillwa o4l to o»4a ffoq o^Jf 10 aolisilml al ooalsasiOtf AooofliXtio «il# \o .ono-v* k'-' ... ^oiiyj ’ ^ »_ 1 •o«iq B 101 #«>ntO f'loiUotd •!*< #ioX f« >^mti old!* ioodA ^ *0®! roo i||flOtjL •iH flfXd lOl ®#*UiO#a •oaX<^^J^ »#oltlO too .fi^ 3*«Af %M 10*140 oid Bo^od wl ^ooltlOi uil? t/lJ ffi XXlOo §litiX fO-dO$l e>ex oott i«olt otf* .•X>Qll«4 owl 010* *olilio £»oit oi ®yPl fiot\ .S4®1 OJ 06tl aoit ixioo.oo orf# i>«» »®X0l ol 1 atilj 10 iX4. •* . 10 XIo Villi'* odl ol oodift Aid oj «to;o.o 9^*Jt ofltf 10 taoHjlIlio ftoiudlilnpo oii ?9§X oaoiil^ .aiioV lodload Bid H,* 4 •*.a,w«K.^^w * .T01I ui o-tol dood (ti oealolilto «a*iod AJiw liXd i«4ot «OBX r if»o^lll Ml >#rfAlq*»oo" a# * f I. i btu, oi flolaiq'o to nl riel ^ 4 | 00 Q ^ jufv e^oe^tfoe Xle O^flX e^eeJ qiJneilX to tioXeol aoo« mete** »«» n««eV eeSM^e ^u;« sas o^ Atfood eav ^ tail} e oiq »aXaXa<<<0 tfi qnaBii4 d4lw oft 0^ ftaB BoUXir ♦nalOK tota» % .dauoidi ilel 4joXofloaai delda ilarf’jloaXO tnfn olieaXq adi tot lanirlaa X#«aao» qi*v a ftaa , ee^a ^aaol aooe a«2 •'.atl^-aaooil T^tlid4 fttt* eviJca «a ‘ eaa ena .^ta 'f 1 • ^ainaeti' ,iltiqe elufoaei a eaw aied 3 od ;oXta?ol aa amatad itili •di'ioXift^ .fileiairfta ^leva laltto xlgal oiaXqtoooa# q» al .Idas ,fltatlnej(uo 6 la ftarlX elqwop i;x»oq •‘saaq o«l •Bj to nollwoaeoiq ftaooae edi fteiiBoae laeq eXdi to ladoi .ftaqaoeo Jl ala*a 1»8 ♦• .lealmaa** to eeodi ^aftati ♦•oa'ild to-.-iaaq •aoXainaar^ edJ eaa Hdl '^aex n "i* eoex qI leoax ,aao#eliaX» iitoeqaael? cBalw^XXot adi aia btob ataa odw oaea -iJit ftiavftS /qJblodaiafi-nddcaXaftnell xllat *dXooaXd ,aXeri*a 9 :. nJii 9 ual •aotfait .olqaH Bqaaoi aaail ^Xo»a» iaXodlll .feXaiei / .BldXab JflJqoito .1*0 ,ael ,aif»ai D m J r ^.' 6 1609 Leigh Hunt's father died. 1810-12 Hunt became editor of the "Reflector," a literary quarterly ventured by his brother John. It was much the same in nature and in creed as the "Sxaminer." It contained the first ver- sion of "The Feast of the Poets;" and in the final install- ment appeared "A Day By the Fire," which Mr, Kent character ices as "light and frothy as a whipped syllabub." It is per haps the most characteristic of those colloquial essays in the writing of which Leigh Hunt stands alone. The "Reflec- tor was discontinued after the fourth number, 1811 But trouble was brewing for the Hunts. John Scott had writ- ten an article against flogging, and the Hunts quoted it in the "Examiner." For this they were prosecuted the third time. Again they were acquitted, but for the last time. It was during this year that Hunt first resided at Hampstead, where he remained until his prosecution in 1613. 1812 Robert Browning was born. Dickens was born. Horne Tooke died 1813-15 The article for which Leigh Hunt and his brother John were prosecuted, appeared in the Examiner for March 12, 1612. They were fined 500 pounds each and sentenced to separate gaols for two years (from February 3, 1813 to February 3, 1815^. This imprifionment was unfortunate for Leigh Hunt so far as his health was concerned; but so far as making him- self known, and gaining friends, a better way could not have been devised. He was regarded as a martyr. Among those who visited him were Moore, Byron, Hazlitt, Charles and Mary Lamb, pitman, Mitchell, Barnes, and Bentham; and he corres- ponded with his "friend of friends," Shelley, won the ad- 1 ? 306X « *-.ioi&4»xi§8^ «d4 la toiU>9 awaa^ &X-0I81 ttf^Jiir al •««» ^t,pm «*w il ,aAoV \9iiiP’i4 nlA baiajo#? tot tp'tlx #iSi ^^aclAJfloo il ^ ,-ipatmpxB** •• bmnxc al taa tlMiPml loail aiiJ fiX Aiui lo i«««l oriT** lo aoi» * tloa^tiuio Jaoi* .•»» dalAw fi<> %d \aaal tai^tiaaad xnaVL baa ioXtaAO ,J^XXt«B ,aoixa ,aiooM i^iqw *Xd talicXt -oaimoo od ^aa ^oadtaad baa .oaaxad ,XX«4oiiil ♦aaiiiX^ ,d«ja -ta ©41 00% ,%*XXatl8 -.aAaaXil lo tatlil" *Xrt a/|w totooq / 'tJ sxex ■.■0C»'{ 'll? r' v4,| ■il t I / *^3 1 ' “' ^ ■] *-;.r *H Hp T. . ] ri sssL-rr.-K /' w-JtS ■■St , miration of Keats, and made his position as the protector of liberty secure. It was not long before his family was allowed to remain with him in prison. He Kept a garden, grew flowers, beautified the walls of his rooms with pic- tures, installed a pianoforte, entertained his friends, wrote poetry and prose, edited the "Examiner,** and enjoyed, except for ill health, two of the happiest years of his life Here was born his eldest daughter Mary Florimel (afterwards Mrs. Gliddon) 181£ Hunt left prison February 3, and went to reside at Bdgware Road, where he was visited by Byron and Wordsworth, Words- worth*s solemnity stood in the way of a full understanding between Hunt and himself. Says Hunt, "there are good-hum- oured warrants for smiling which lie deeper even that Mr. Wordsworth* s thoughts for tears." They did not meet again / for thirty years. 1816 Hunt removed to Hampstead (in the Vale of Health, as Hunt called it) for the benefit of the air. Here he was fre- quently visited by Shelley. The exact date of their first meeting has not been ascertained, but it was probably some- time between March, 1812, and February, 1813. The lasting friendship was cemented during the trials connected with the sj^nlicide of Shelley* s first wife, Harriet, and the pro- ceedings instituted by Shelley to obtain possession of his children after Harriet* s death. Hunt gave Shelley as much sympathy and support during it all as it is possible for one fellow being to extend to another whom all the world has deserted. This was also, according to the best evidence V TD^frP^O’xq ■« 0ol9l«bq tl/S boji dol;r«titin ««v qXtMl «14 •tolifrb «ooX »AV il •o'KdOfd It *dt»n^9 • S^0iL «H .notlTq ol mid dii* altmti oi tt«o£X« ( .oiq dtfiw viKOdT tld ^0 ■XXtw •df febltitfirjittf ,t*t«woXl «#T| L .etatXtt fid btffXdincfat »«9^olOBtlq » btXXtit^i « ttfiri V . • ,l)«XCt«t fciu» '•,ntal«t*a'« td» btlXbt ,tto*iq bc« ft^toq tJoi* til •Id to ttttx ^tttl^qtd •^^^ \o o9t »ASlik0d X » i fqttstt ItttitoXT xttK tisw^bS' da tblttt bi" doat tdto^C ffotliq dtti tndE -ttr^of .dVnt^^atttW ba« dOixa xd Atbiilir tAW ad t^fd# ,baoll t. ,•• ' ' ftflbBAlfl'itfcat Usrt a‘ to t*» i^todo xdltwtaXOa t^dd^tv •AiiOaod«qaii« od baromat lDidl -tti EBW' ad aiaK .nl* add to #itaaatf'‘^add lot (dl baXlAo litlt tladd to aoat dda*a adf .tdXfadd %d badialv XX^aaojp -a«o« tXdacfoiq* oai» il dod «daoladtaooa natd ioo aad ^aldatM 1 ^IdiaX *d» .CX8X .x^awtOa*. bfta ,aX8X .doiall aoandad a«ld^ i * dJ la badoadooo aXalal add ^di’CBb badrtawtc eaa qldabaalt't -otq%dd baa ,dalitan ,*tlw /a-ilt t’xaXIaia to adlo^jt ad| aid to oolatataoq alaJdo o# talXaiia qd Jbalwdldtai aaald.aaa doa» «a XtHadS aras ja»m .d^aab a^rdalttoB ta»t* ao^ibXldo ‘ Ifio tot afdliidq al si ea XXa di taltoh itoqqW# bda xii^ot«n« ► 1 r " i' * tad bltcv add^XXa moda taddoxsa od d«ad»a e# ^dXotf^j^IXat aooabiva laad add 'bar 'Btffbtoooa ,oiXa aaa dIdT .baitatab '5S‘Xi Hi bcax 8 obtainable, the year, probably the winter, in which Hunt met Keats. 1817 In this year Hunt left Hampstead for Lisson Grove North, where he resided at No. 13. He did not remain long. 1818 After leaving Lisson Grove, he resided at 8, York Buildings, New Road. It was here, according to Hunt, that he first met Keats; but Hunt is probably wrong. 1819 Hunt became editor of '*The Indicator," (October 13, 1819 to March 31, 18£1) the "most racy and delectable of all his periodicals," During this year he began "The Literary Pock- et-Book, (1619-1822) an annual intended "to furnish a pock- et memorandum book for intellectual observers and persons of taste," Percy Hunt born. 1819 Percy Florence Shelley born, at Florence, Italy, November 12 . 1820 1821 While residing at 13, Mortimer Terrace, Kentish Town (April 6 to August 23} Keats was moved to Hunt's home to be nursed in his all but final illness. Unfortunately a misunderstand- ing arose. Keats accused Hunt of breaking a seal on a let- ter addressed to himself from Fanny Brawne . Keats left in anger, but later found out that he had accused Hunt unjust- ly. They became somewhat reconciled. In September of the same year Keats left for Rome with Severn. The Prince Re- gent, whom the Hunts had libeled(^) becomes George IV. Hunt removes to the Vale of Health, Hampstead, On November 15 he and his family, at the request of Shelley and Byron, set sail for Italy, where Hunt is to become editor of a new magazine, "The Liberal," planned by Byron and Shelley, The iiXtfH 4 o 1 j 1 w^ tft *4^ ,»id*al*J»ld <« J .., .tJ#oX i#m ♦ ddipf •VftTO aotatl lOl dauE iJitf# «I .)0cX ^o« Ibiii ®H *CI .ol iA Ltlkistt tii -i*Aw ,•«fll^Uoa 410 T .8 14 tU , 4 V 010 ao«tii iftlvaal %»^\k 3ilJl 44 ^4di ,^OE J»01AT0 004, *4W «l4i .soomv Xid«doi(i »1 lVi«B 3 *W #•» 43 8X61 ♦ttl iAflo3oO) ",to3A®li^Al •41*' to •*03 IfiO. »auio»d, 3aim •id IlA to •XdaJooItfc l)tf4 dtOB" 04 * (i^BX ♦XB doiAjX doo'4 •41*’ aAittd «4 •£••% •t03 aoitaa *« • •XAoitoXjvof -4oo - 3 »X-a 00 Xo** • i^itXdAO'xd le XPoS btayoca b3*oH aaX Hi jJbX sdaBl .Oflwotd ^naal moil IXostrld o3. todooiAB* <«io3 - 3 o»i®w 40*4! Bod»»&A Bad oO 3*d3 Juo l»a»ol i» 3 aX .3 0 d*|, uK-sfl* •rii to ^•••• 4 o#i 8 *l .Oollocooot 3 adKoottL%% »flf .aw«v#B 43I* •«0E tol 31*X BiBB% o##* I ?X •1‘itfP ••dio.ooo ti^d#X#dXX iXedi #43 «o4« todP^voa aO .B 4 ® 3 ®qmaH ,a 3 £a#K 10 oicV^ od 3 o3 ••tO«di iooH ,001^4. Boa 8:»X£»il8 10 3*o«|»n •03 3A ,^XXffl«l il4 Baa o4 -Bi voa a io,/to3iJba »iao6*d o3 cX 3aaS atailw •tX»BI tol XXai 3## j?i !'■ •a| *toXXo 4 B baa ltd- ioaaaXq •‘*Xa'*#dl4 oJlT” /♦aX»»Baa 9 boat on which the Hunts set sail was overtaken by storms and bad weather and compelled to lay over at Ramsgate for three weeks. They sailed again, and reached Partbouth with great difficulty. From there they went to Plymouth, where they had to remain until Way 13, 1822. ^hile at Plymouth, Hunt, '*the privatest of all public men," found himself compliment- ed to his pleasurable embarrasment by the presentation of a silver cup by some friends of the "Examiner." 1621 Keats died, February 23. 1322 Leigh Hunt, his wife and seven children, again sailed for Italy, May 13, They arrived at Genoa in June. On the 28 they sailed for Leghorn and landed there on July 1. Seven and one half months from London to Leghorn! (Those who are superstitious, may find cause for Hunt's misfortune in the recurrence of the figure 13 in many of his undertakings) The voyage had been undertaken with a good deal of hope and fear. Upon his arrival in Italy, Hunt called on Byron at Monte Nero. After his return from the visit to Byron, Shel- ley, who was living in Villa Magna, Lerici, came to see him. Together they went to Pisa, which was the town abode both of Shelley and Byron. By previous agreement it had been arranged that Hunt should occupy the ground floor of Byron's house, the Casa Lanfranchi. After Shelley had seen Hunt well settled, he, together with his friend Captain Williams, and a seaman named Charles Vivian, set sail on the return to Lerrichi. All three occupants of the boat were drowned. Shelley's body was cremated August 16. The ashes were pre- served and buried in the Protestant Cemetery at Rome--the »• ij^ *Mit XI 4 B j#t «XKuS «ritf doidw 4 © iMOtt ©•llit K9l f5«lfl<£«il J4 t#TO t9tl0qmoo t>HS ^0tU9Mf bm4 ^ J4*ti iUl» if#B0iiii««! ©©Ii©4#l fcc© •Aia«« ^•di #n©ifw eiaili «otX .sabB .tfjBowirx iM ttlfll .S»«r .cx lliaa alsm^'x oS M •i V 11 .;)a#cUa#n4Xlilo ot^O© l>®4l fHl% till taattB dB^^'X •C Adi to .otStfC al AOoeO #a hwfixth' \0tii •tl %mU- ^\lMil cii>voi •! tisrX ao #n#d^ tobaaX baa aiodBAil foX bitlla* •>t 4 i ooB ©oodT) !B*»od*il 01 BOftaOiX «otH »xiaa©« il*d oao bo* oifj 0i OMtfitoKi* •’jaifB loH 09000 taiX X*« . caol » X tf feAdqoa T ^ ( iHl^ iifainift'aa «id Ho Xdd 0 oi CJ odi to ooa*lto©**t fcc* oqoa Hu X*»ft booa a dJXia «o5la4ifrOca C8#0 bad •»4\ov od® J4 ooix« «o boX/*o a«»/H oi x*»iito tirf noqU •laoH -lodi ,ooTrt® 0^ iltid ©ili ffotH a-rf-lot .OAdUi^oaoMl' ..fin oao oi o 0 »o ,i©ii»a .ariBdil alXlv aX ^Ifil oov oilv rX*X ; r dio-4 fbod# cwot ©di •«©» Hotifw ,aetx OJ i^^ow >C©di •f©di©7>o® i(i, .•./V;f aood bad ii *iao«co»t»o •opiroiQ %t . «ott6 ba* HA eS * '' ‘ *■> ■ t 9^0C'%%i Ho TOOXH bMVOIh WJi XQWCOO bXOOdO SiXIilL i9lU b#»a©ll4 rtaM *•»« Jb0d xtflUMe loiHi .idaa*»Ho*a #*40 04i ,-iOOQg M t/ •0olXXXv aiiJqoO booivt lid dilw ‘fodioooi ♦ od ,b»Xi#©A XXo» aioio'x odi a© Ix*o ito ,a*l?IV ooXKado 15004a 040400 4 baa .bonooib 0*100 #0©d 0ili Ho oia 4 qreoo ©oAdJ X^A . 14 olaio»t oi - 4 in nfv,c 0 dO 4 §Af .^X itat^A *0^40010 04 W tbo<^ n^^xtU^aS M ^ TS 0di.-00Ot 04 f*o)i ®©»©0 ia0i00iOA^ , 4 di^ al baliod ban Aovteo ' ' ^ I . Wi; 10 spot of which Shelley had written, "It might make one in 1 love with death, to think that one should be buried in so sweet a place . 18£2»23 Hunt edited **The Liberal,'* which ceased publication after the fourth number* 18E3 After the death of Shelley, Byron’s interest in "The Liber- al" waned, and Hunt was left to struggle with it alone. The sales fell off, and the "Liberal" was finally abandoned. After Byron left for Greece, July 13, Hunt left Genoa for Florence. He lived mainly at Maiano, about two miles from the city, on the Fiesolan Hills, It was here that Hunt made the acquaintance of Landor. His favorite son, Vincent, was born at Albaro. Hunt, at this time, was supporting himself by contributions to the "Literary Examiner," and other per- iodicals . 18£4 Leigh Hunt and his brother John had a misunderstanding about the proprietary rights in "The Examiner," Except for this slight misunderstanding (serious for the time) the two brothers were greatly devoted to each other throughout their lives. Lord Byron died at Missolonghi, Greece, March 19. 1825 From Maiano, where he had spent "a very disconsolate time," Hunt and his family set sail for England, September 10. He arrived in London, October 14, and settled down for steady, but not very lucrative work, at Highgate. 1826 Leigh Hunt’s old enemy, Gifford, died. 1827 Swinburne Hunt, aged about 7, died. 1828 Resided at Epsom. Incurred the ill-will of Byron’s admirers by publishing "Lord Byron and Some of His Contemporaries." \ f Yi"' V ‘ ‘VW 01 X nl ••O asCt* bJMf ^equ t»« il •(i blttoA» •*© s*i[s j(aXii« oi tw •Ypl f ^ i *" .«dAXq • t»«r«4i t#jta uoXlaclX^dq AoiAw *',l**xodlI tpilp* Snt/ti » ,'t 4 Agusa At-itioX %At * ' ' * i' ' «Ml> rc?‘ .tnoX# li dtiw •l*naritf« os Sfl »«• «^«E *1 .fitaoliu^dii ^IX^lIt i4r» -Xin^dJiJCr ®di bn-* Hot t»X«« •jol tostO ^ooR .Ct ^XiiV tpTf fkoX aQix« ^oStk -> ‘ s«. s&ex ftttX • > mott ttUai 0*^ SpodA ,cu«d|«i id \talmm btfll .•ootnoXt ib4^(D Xatfli itdi #i#d ttitf XI .tlllB o*Xot*XH •dl ico «%4i« #di • ♦Xotoaif ,oot •iiioT*^ tXB . toflAinlAoyoa, «J BfltXX 4 ?i 4 ^# 40 o id ,7 I tXHOlJDO t 3 ^ 'if jcod* sflXfcBdJtntbdi^ti® jTwIi# . fluJt'i* ••dxox* »14 bad X«vg 4 ||A«X tiiTi xol Jtl riji4»xiQd^4 #44 0«l *44 rOal/ teX BCOlxdi) ^aXblJjtJft-ttbotttl A 94{iXI« tltjcfd I dpd'^uoiirti T«ki*40 dopo Of hoSofob ilddOll •a#tr titodOO^A ,«I 4«x*|| • XAS*oXfl>tiiXj4 ii> ^#Xb oatXd bxo^ , toTlX o4«Xo,t«otitXJl i*ttt «♦* Sawqf kod od •‘itiiw ,paoloU. »oit Lii ,01 t*e««lfH0 ,b.i^J:HiJI t0\ U*e xet •X4 b»® Jdafi «Xb«B4tt xob flWcB bolSSf tap *41 liniJOtfOO ,i(ibb#o4 at X« .istew ofUo^Ottl %%tf 40 tt 4 w 4 ,.v: , i ■ o- .B«li iBlCtti# ,bl 5 > 4 ll«i .bait *f l)[iS»(,4aaB ioxwdaXBa * ^ t4#fl«b#t;d«i •n«8*d iX ♦•’•••a*' «# taii‘ia9 oatado a«i» ^diiw t<« 3 i Of *a'XOtl« ;>oa Mooo 9 i kixi JPOa" 73 K 4 X QAA^O edi iaoata afotnT 9as/B **.'ioX^»T odt’’ •moood boA^'tXXiAt * ol ‘ i *1 ° « •• • ! ,«X ttoA^dof 01^0481 «♦ noofffol'qfoB iritl tIOiffJtii noqdq aniiat 8 AW il .xX *»«•“•••*•« dllAtd Aid fi/clAtoJ^d 1*' *oioiA oil lAdI ••ioX^aT odT** 1:o otfiflXA^ j#dj .lowiii X ,tldl XXa tfiatf qo -lood X tX #X *• • OUlXXdAqAO oil Vo XX«« i>»A ,83l00oXd mitan .Ti i*aX/X 1# tA« *fi oA^ooO **.*Jfo f> 0 oW »'aiJoV*JB 4 BA 0 I tony juXE »« tfX'XAOt okdooq DOS fcelotftO . baorf'woE » «t**XAf I ?»«£ .S 9* fcolioog E&OX .b^oifc JicoS nolIdkV Xo ido H- ..!■* •^ ' w ♦ " ' “a * Vdl XO .&*ax XXXI .AOfXodti /ooff orrxti^O nwc^qVI ^4-^9* b^liltot t ♦al fc Ji# 4 ’k 4 lt& .tcL# *» 4 iiL «{00 .Xto Ji «(> 9 *S #l 8C-V&#X ■ ^ a# 4 «p )o aol»ft»o«i 4 V& 6 X uotfoliatl ,#*iAVp 8 ••Attfwfcl .SS J» X 0 - 0 >eX .a4««c ao«4o3 .^^•X4 X4^«it4*a * 43 e 0 B*o« X#Xtf 404 l .i>#lb k^3M4\ytit (Soft 4 «|i«»& 9 tft A.^noveb'tav ,qltl»iap^a 0 l 'Vfrt IKirl o X4*r*< to ffliri Jittollo ttJior ilb^X • •bnac^ OEX to aoXooo^i A .. .bolJb fItiXQftoO tiooi{ OOS lo ao l«a»y XjitftfBA aa «aw tutf^^ fplxS 004 to aia«il oM k9\!tiam ax Ytex V.I! .aoXaaet IttoXl to iuMi^ «A4 oiotoO iiX,^io 4 lo't tioblbaoo t tmtooo 4 a*H •btlb diiotobipw^ .ooX JaoXXdwt'^ .aottaaoT to lorat al woibdiiir lad »Qldo4ttiotX iaoq P4J ^ ■ '5 ' iB •'*' uolt a obtlX ,aoinaieff 0 X , totiio* oiOfliiXIlat .& ai^^boAX«o 0 fil #% 0 }^ .iUi A* Xlevsio*iO , ^cRS%ofiDs b¥f4^tt0i %bkbltTi eltf |m« iceB . bx«Ii •id lo to lX»*ffi 4 S TtQ a«i 4 I{i 30 O 9 t C 4 i(«a»)i •dl aaei ..■ji 'i«do tidf ** . ••aaH^»*XA* X«voa' •*txt»3(olQ flX 0 Xxqfnljia fcXoiaB i ■ T ■acr (>njt. .iacrCsx ,td»»ciod eld ooqff^ rrtfX* •trdo« ^AlrAAm} aj4( 9Afl^ A»aJ«JaiMl l6«l(oiC[ lsr€ .•£d«l)X o ■** ■<■ T • »re*ii 4 iu<» oiiX 7 «d»tb 700 fi 7 tt«osl 7 . 7 aal ei adAJl .tX 4 *«i> ^i#v |Aa 6 •liBcotal ‘ »trfiA •^»oM 7 '^ I aaoX«d 01 ** Xo«t 0 X 4 •b^tr ctSRbb «x»E .a«Xi 7 ntf 6 dsi#X «« ,^dXi«Xlii "' * ' j .$mul daioA ovoX itoXAft » 0 lfl£aiip •XAoa Ano oaftaffd #■ '* 4 i «• 9 > « 0*0 , : p *^*^j*i 3 ftft^to tad Jitifli 4 alo 4 oalv odX AS Iw AoaatjoctiA at tti «i>X«8 i»ii til itoidw to ,xtoXoiBtp BftOiO lAiifl#! ni daj; ^ id « XjjaXI n*t) ^ot** .^Mooif ttOft <»ld to oiddl IoIkdo »dS^‘^AJlw atifoaaaoo rtl TtooX atSlp i Atta^ •ii'ftwox »AXrio« •t«t4 a| ,7aoi4 1 , fiOioftdo-Ao^; ' 1 . ' , ti?- 14 my solitary walks, with eyes at once most melancholy, yet consoled.*' On October 19, 1669, a monument to Leigh Hunt was inaugu> rated by Lord Houghton. The fund had been started at the sugges- tii>n of S. C« Hall, and been subscribed to by a large number of ad- mirers and friends, both in England and America. Among those who had contributed were Robert Browning (Chairman), John Bright, Thomas Carlyle, Charles Dickens, Lord Houghton, Lord Lytton, John Ruskin, Bari Russell, B. W, Proctor, Sir Percy Shelley, Alfred Tennyson, and C« S. Hall. According to Thornton Hunt, the monument consists of a pedestal decorated with the design of a '*Jar of Honey,** and surmounted with a bust of the essayist, executed by Mr. Joseph Dur- ban, A. R. A. The inscription contains the fourteenth line of his poem, best known of all, "Abou Ben Adhem": "WRITE MB AS OKE WHO LOVES HIS FELLOW MER. " ■i' .■twt' WWSbSBBB .itXetiiOL ##x *tXorfo«AX»w t^oa •on* 7« ««t* 4#iwstjf|«ir XTn^iXoa zm i t -r ^Vjiumai 8«« liiflH il»l«a >«#«naom • .fl8| ,'«1 i««6jro0 aO A '•itniM vHI J« Loj-iaJa a«»4 J»a8 ftaot «rtT ,np^ii*«oH Av»A ^d bm^st j -t« to ttdMkfa oinr*! g 0^ 8*dlto#do« a««d bam ,li«8 ,o .8 to «4i4 odw otodi *.#oi*iO«A *«• taoXaiOt at diod .oX/Aolft £>a« SiAPOH'i aito^ 8fllcooia ifdoSl •%bv hgSy4h,tttoo bdti \ ,/iiifeo8 OdOV ,aoftxJi htoJL «aoJ4]|OOR t>fo4L^} , oaerioXit^ ooXtAdO lOitiioO o 4i»0*ti«#T bdn^Xk ,^olXod8 xotoR -rl8 ,‘ioJooi'i .W .6 ,XXo««^ % • ^•loao© itiofeiTflofl oo^ofodT oi aaift'xoooA .iXa» .a ,.0 ina bad '\t«eoH to -laV a to daloot «ii^ iLtiw batata gab tasiabao, * to ■' ♦ , , -lira dqaaal .iR 8eicrooxo ,#4iMJioot to dood « a#X« Rolaoonioo f a 'I ' _ tXd to ooll dda«»dittot odd * 010^000 ooUqXiooaX odf .A . 8 A ,aod ,f**«*iiX>A <104 00 d A" ;iiio to flwomt dotd ,«oo^ ’•♦HR* wo.UL«f 84!r‘ e«n*oi ohv aia 8 a afa iwi8f«* A; ■■¥ f ■ ' A.. "V '.i/> . -*. if -*' » ' ■■- ' r- ' ■•V ' :i^-Y ; 1 ■ .. ‘V^ ‘ > 2^*2 < ■ ti ' . 'S '*' ^ ,L * V * 4 1- '> MV MU i'* '.iidL'-i 15 II ATTITUDES AO TEOENCIBS The spirit of Hunt’s work; warmth, geniality, acuteness, vigor. His wide reading and catho- licity of taste. The two-fold nature of his writings: creative and critical. Ask who Leigh Hunt was, and those whom you question will in- variably a&swer: '’Leigh Hunt? Oh, yes, I know him; he’s the man who wrote that poem about ^Abou Ben Adhem.''^ And if, among those whom you ask, there happens to be a lover of "vers de societe", he may venture, "Yes, and didn’t he write that little rondeau, ’Jenny kissed me when we met. Jumping from the chair she sat in; Time, you thief, who love to get Sweets into your list, put that in; Say I’m weary, say I’m sad. Say that health and wealth have missed me. Say I’m growing old, but add, Jenny kissed me.’" Knowledge concerning LAigh Hunt and his writings does not extend very far beyond the hazy information about the two poems just men- tiot^d. Once in a rare while the response to the question will in- clude "The Glove and the Lions." This is not as it should be. For Leigh Hunt at his best is worth knowing; and his best is not in his poems, but in his essays and in, what we may call for the want of a better term, his criticisms. The Hunt of popular conception is not the Hunt he himself would have chosen to be. Except that he wanted to be known as a poet, his purpose was "only to teach and be taught, or if that be w JMElrak -sl ' • • - - yr r \. J. ■ ■'. ia «, ^ *,r.- vfei 'If ■ . ■-! ‘wr' i'- -cnt^/?t , ,’U 1 '**'. ■V ' *' * : k N* " ,1 ■'^Wm i ,4 j'^ ■ f arafc^lORt^/' ■;.?'^ -i,r. ,' Tm ■ ., ’-: ■ i- .-: ■ "7.‘'^|^^ ■f ' * ' ^**' \ ■»' ff- , ' r ' .;:*/■ '"if ,. . ’' r ■:';,■?■ ''.Vofli />iX f^'' »oA«:' ^ 4 :' •’*»jl 6Q4 'iTOf”^ to- 1«t«i JI O^f *V ’• ’ ‘^' ‘' i?'i ;* # '■*■ ■ ■ 'Jt' " T.-jr , ■■ ^;?yV'*' Wf . / A-.' 1. ' ..:; ■ ./--■v'!^ oij ’VA-!’ >/4iW . R'^wr ■ 0Zi}lUOM 9M »xv» «V- V f . T**^^,*****' r 'V' . ■’■ '■ ■ > r ^ ■ ' ,.jw •tff.llt litfllw "An Attempt of the Author to Bstimate his Own Character", in his "Autobiography" ed. by Ingpen. Vol. II, page 268. 2. Thornton Hunt in the "introduction" to the "Autobiography" ed- ited by him in 1660. Smith, Elder Co. T '•V- ■ ~'-'T " if n I'n r* it ^tr:! 5i, :.'.-rjraai; r< lit s*r - 4 . I J . M /■. noAtf9 . a«ioii •VaqBOo Ji)a# cJ fniixb^ a ■*' - p JAotdA bAbtrlmi id § «oqiaq_^1o^lapiD»^a^^ l4t«a«« «l4i Xlt>A*0fA fed# vlao IXIt' 4 b 1«JL *#ii» *1 •* ^4LHw idv has iyialaisixsaitA X19XVM «X #*jlw hits Islvlti V»*« »oXX«t «Xii »ao ft* ii: l„ - V - ■„ I ' , . (T* ,y ^ C....J,. ■•■.> ;- . . ;, ■ IX& iuotfd f«»A«IOAaoW4^aoo a /'T Atfri#* |o»t ^ ^ \ • ■<'* ' * 1*' has ,l£m dii^ dci oi aoii*iiXrt^«/»i> * #n || ' ■ "3 ‘ * «• '*' Umai S* 4X*? B jj^ I Cv ' raA«cfk 6 ba A^fr»«'i^Xt a^»i*dV%o'i •bifcuq ttAB‘*q4i*»#o«X« lisa i V fi ‘ 't: ,. .', " 1 sAt auv ii^iov 0 ■ iar I / r f. erq i;aK Sii^siom bttS , ® X|^*. ' r /| , ■ 4* I V % I is^as ^ ft ->' ■ ««> > ' • b«A ,A3(o0e tfld •• 4 l^JS 04 0« itpl ^^foo«i.0 yon luaS . ■ r 'I . . ‘i ' SI -o*iq Joa tOAA S4 tX. istt Toc^a illOA *AI iLs ul X»OA '•BOiBlA* .Q/«AO 0«# rAJlO 10 AoX^AX»AtV^f »ao OJ toy<*^0tX« 4‘A«ttliqq«Ji laO' • mi a«jio vnott ^al" ,«tAx4i X io tsshl sd$ qXAfri# •' (#j *Ta4 Air' atify *‘*' . 4»a.>,oXXo«aX \t#iA - fi. i«i t d A *' ( 'I i' I f^' X' AA hlfi to atw#A 4 ►•Y^Offiswl ?>a« 4ctn ,asitaa'-xlXsl^*a%B§^ pd^'^hss iV > . , ' . ■■ • • T.' * -'bt Df4 OiX'^'oiX^ ta-sahMlw I f M. l > ft A aaa '' A Ai / ? ^ - -iJl, * ■ -cfAi jqofado o^vtjroirua *1 •** ioAO ts^^sis icpi st it •aotoiil® . • -‘^ ' 1%. '. '■t’l 'II . tlk' B fc yaiJuoqfllX' si is/li ajaiiO *4 toiiw to 9XiXjj[a sHif si |X, tjy ■ I. ' ' ' ■'*’ ■ ’'D^i iJasiyossi sioi* sM fsdw XlL Ji^lqs sdd hi xiuo^JaM Oa# .a0ly»«i4 OJ tiT lot* r#loaioAao oiooi rf*»to 01 ft olotw 04 4ei4W j^L »lts halt ItsHa to o4oo4 taaip tlxl^-to t^tq qttvt ap .rfo/AO i.v '■<■•'.- ' - ' , 'j.J I ■ . 3 tfi , ***iq*o*ta4?J Jtpr0“ «X|X tyjci.«iX3A3l oy ^toi<**‘!A‘Aitj! Xg ifimstiX oA** •». *aa$ t^iaf«5 tl‘X -XoV ,|j#'^’'y0q4n?fOlOoytriA^ •00' '*o4qA%|jo i 00^41** OiiJ ®y ^^BoiOoobonyfeX*’^wai 'ttl ‘yAwK. indi ■■'* ) ■ , ' ■'■i* . »-■ ISO 00^ itoi^w oi sal^iqooi^ otofi^ /. 4 ' «? .7 ' ■'*. «Xtl x«o dllw 9^tUQ0X§lBl iXiiMb oal tti liffll JbEia I/o;i4Mi •no at . ttoX ,W'-‘ )o aoittottof ait ai '^aott soa •«« i^vl? ti^td ,tnrt. #0 tt ttj(onX oA« mia I B4b l$pi tiltidlo' t'•> ”'■ ,. ' *” .' 'l> '■ i\ r ^ T ,od %em axtdf rtctaiXttm So , a«ataao 10 doaX a , atttdatw b.tdaoXo - ' 1 J .. . . 1 , ,. 6 ' a ion 8 i td iadi »ioaS di «aO tXioi oB .^IXttS doo«,,tas tbaaooa i%t * /.h! -■■ ^ f bttiiqiot "fd XXia*? ,txaa td ♦*, abotins .oattyufotbaaooo . SaXXXai tdi^ ol aXaq tXdi ttfiiiitai^ ^tSSi>« I baa)o «adi XXti I atdO^ * ' 51 . a lo iotqttn odd 11 ta Xatl X »aa« laotBosaoa.a ioo out I iiJ H . ■ . . 4 : . , ' ■ ® Xaa I otdw ta^yoi daeiol #«•« ,tad|o tdi to ovoX tdi boa >aot tao ' * f .' - ^ ' 'f " " „ /■ '■ "r '* ' o -«oT .OB aticrata-tt aoiiotXlaifj tidi boa $iipa idbop iod ipt .SXdl Toi io;otXlaff » 1 X •i'xa "ttiif fdi %% qtS b* . a .Xltqt ool aqiaoibaX ^^’•atsbndO oXfiXa^Tf tQiaoa^ «S ttfrod bna fOtobf •atd>:ai %atb«aO ^XaoiBoXooH^ a oi XltiT A** .S , »*•., . 1 '^ ' r ji ■'f iXi*' Jp \ ¥DF< ' :iu.u '> '.flb'bid 18 ciroums tances , known only to myself, haTe shown me that the organ- isation I was horn with has been weakened, by subsequent oares and demands upon it, into a mortifying destitution of physical courage. ••• But I have great moral courage. Allow me a pale face and a little reflection; and as there is scarcely a danger in life which I have not hasarded, so there is none 1 could not go through with in a good cause. **^ Physical courage is very often moral weakness. It is easier for some to jump on pointed spikes than to face taunts of cowardice, easier to undergo physical punishment than to tell a truth. We need but measure our mistrust of Hunt's strength with our knowledge of his practiced courage, and we shall not long be- lieve that he lacked moral fibre when moral fibre was needed to maintain his principles and his convictions in the face of opposi- tion. He had principles and convictions, and moral courage in abundance to maintain them. In the days when liberal opinions were a dangerous possession, he held them and expressed them in no un- certain terms. He spoke straight from conviction, firmly and with- out fear. For his temerity he suffered with calm constancy an im- prisonment of two years which by slight submission he could easily, 2 and without any great violence to his principles, have evaded. But we are glad he did not evades his mission was to "teach.** And unless the ideals formulated in words are worked out in deeds we ma;i not be convicted of their verity. But so convicted we accept them as an inheritance. The worshiper of physical heroism will find 1, Quoted by B.B. Johnson in his "Leigh Hunt," p. 139. 2 , "Autobiography." Revised by Thornton Hunt, p. 208. See also "Leigh Hunt’s Correspondence," vol, I, pages 69-98, for inter- esting side lights on his life in prison. His prison period ex- tended from 3rd Feb., 1813 to 3rd Feb. 1815. I m)ud« ot :<-.u n;vaer!£ • #eeafii^‘;.A4ro>slo a ' tjA iN^>tj»c Idobjpttodt ao*4 atod »«» X aotfmti . ft^ATcroo icdii\d4 [ \d aol/irtZi^AvDi a, o9el aoqtr aX>nd«Aji c An4i Q0«1 AlAq 4 9« voXXjX '.f||A7iro'o X«itoa i««7S •▼«<{ I 9o< ..• iteldv «1U ai lo^^b « \X*g9ao« »X 9*std9 ba ba# ;dol999l\Ai #Xt9lI dilw dgitOTd9 on 90A Jblooo 1 OAOA ti OtmdJ CM «^fntABA/i loa BVAXi 1 S 5 .. ^ '»3 a - .•BBUaAAA lAtOA X^»»» CM'Widd XAOi«xit^<^ S.MAAO Ijocb M ^al r V * o 9 q; 2 A 9 »oa> 09 SAd 9 BAiClqt toXoXoq ao caoC, o 9 onot lol rctcsc Ml #1 XX«9 o9 amd) -^adadclauq lAoZtxdq otx«tnd o9 xotMo ,ooibiA!^e to ■ 7 T ■ ■ ‘ ^ '■’ ,r dJltf iiii«toi9a B'faoH to JcsrUMlm nya c^aMJM»m 9^6 Oaaa^aV ,A9mx9 i .'1 , looqqo to ooAt Mf9 at caoH^lrtioo mIa bao ktXqlodItq lid alA^niAv oi 9t«itfoo tdxcm bad , «ooXf oXVaoo bnA atlqloaltq bj|d «B .aci9 . ,T ■ . 1*109 «»4olfliqo taxcdll aoiiw tfAb od9 ol •bied9 a^AXslAot o9 AooAbiSAdA _ ... V u , ^■ •A7 Off tfi .,a#cC 9'' bf ihkoiqio bffk nrvd.* ^Xcue! dd ^AolBAObboq ovototaob A 0 . OffA tlAHt "'aol^tlTBoo r‘d- 1,1 9 dil Alto oijoqo oH «Xa 9 i#o -Vi ao xottAJadao aXap dJlV boiAti^oo ott v^XtosJOi. Hd' lot "viAAt . iao iy'" ^"“y ,qXlAAO bX^ofii Jyd 'iroiooindb*' tyi d " . . S i T r. .BiAoq OAi', to ifiosadoiiq ¥'■■■■ ... ' ** * ' ■ ,, t ’ »bmbafv oTAd ,BoiqxoaXiq tid oi fodoXoi v iAfin l£dA iaoddio bna ■'■■ '''' ' ■> oal **.4 oao9** o9 oav aoXoVin ' icbavc ^oo«*bXb dd XiAXi o.iA cm iyH r If [AO cm tbccM ttl icro i>A9:ioir oIa obioir bodaldaio t ■^oXiAd’bi* otli' oooXaa •tdX iqoeoA AV OdtoXvitoc o«, 9 o«,^^,,.qjlio'V ^iodi^ to bbiolrffde •« 9 oaJ ^ '■*■• ■ ^.' f ..^ ■ V-- , i [ batt IClv KKioiAd tAolA^dq to *ioqld*alo«r Ad? .ooffAiiiO'^X gA^oo -t ^ .! * * ^ .CdX .q ^ •ioofit^dnloj*' old ol ao«adol bbio^ipV i A4lA OOB0 ,bO» ,q .9«oB ffoiaipd? Xi booitiia • ,5tdqA*caiibo9aA" *S' tot S€-«b oonorV-;^! tXot * »AbAobBdq|idiioO.,;A‘’ 94 di, dn^Aii** »-|;a boltoq o|H .dooiiq vti'X old «o; tf^lX obl*:>»iii9 oo / ,i.*3i:'3X »<<•? bid 'od SX'bl »,d|s.^>i6 ffldit doiflo.if.' M 54 ;.. T 19 very little in Leigh Hunt to emulate; but if practical application of ethical principles, and moral obligations unhesitatingly and vigorously perf ormed^have any claim on hero worshipers, then he will be of those who inspire others to take heart again. But it is not only the spirit of Mr, Hunt's work that we not- ice; his wide range and catholicity of taste also attracts our at- tention. Charles Lamb, in a sonnet entitled "To My Friend the In- dicator," hints at the compass of his reading and the universality of his taste. In an anonymous contribution to the "Indicator" (it is signed by four stars) he says: Your easy Essays indicate a flow, Lear Friend, of brain« which we may elsewhere seek; And to their pages I, and hundreds, owe. That Wednesday is the sweetest of the week. Such observation, wit, and sense, are shewn. We think the days of Bickerstaff returned; And that a portion of that oil you own. In his undying midnight lamp which burned. I would not lightly bruise old Priscian's head. Or wrong the rules of Grammar understood; But, with the leave of Priscian be it said. The Indicative is your Potential Mood . Wit, poet, prose-man, party-man, translator-- H , your best title yet is INDICATOR.^ 1. Hunt quotes this sonnet in Ho. LI of the Indicator for Wednes- day, September 27, 1820, in an essay entitled "On Commendatory Yerses," In a characteristic comment upon the sonnet, Mr, Hunt ' T, eat.’t JT . i Aci^Aoil^c;*. X«ol4e4aq ti Jia6 ot UiaZ A%t'9X Al ■4>‘ . : &a# ««ol4AigiIdo Ui6« i>a^ , od'lqioAltq xiolittf# ,Iiw Alt aodi , •ttqXda^ro*' ao 0 tdtf %i» 90 %onIr • ttUii riJiif oX diiqvAi oam^ 9 $odf to M ' ^ ' ' '■ ^ * " * - ^ j- -voff •• ^AtfJ e*4A«H .t* xo XluXqi 0A4 qiao }qa ii: IX iff4 -Xa too o»X0 090IIX to qXleXiodlAo Jb«A j^a«i ' •Aiw joot I --ol i>crti-x 1 xM oT** frefJi'Xfio X«aAoa » ffl ;dm«X[ aoXTAdO \aol$dtS i$tXs^r 9 Vltlu #ilX ftaa idlOAai aid to «a#qA 09 »dX X« aXttld *‘,toX«oXft JC0 4 47) if. ■5 ^ ■, "' r 3 i) td 9 04 aol 4 ooXiX«oo iOOinxaoffA a« aX ‘'foXoAX ' f id tq 'a'* ^ . 4 .r; V ® ?tx^* f® i**^*^* Jd*: bafl 3 l • '''•i; .volt a oXAditai axAitojI x«( 4 ^* : :/0«a vtAdvaalo x^a w ncidv ^uIaki to .Xmoitf lavist.. ,*vo taa ,| of^^Aq tXvdX oX ^OA .aCaav odX to Xao# 0 »^«t odX-«ai Tai>a#AlitW xa^XT V- uvoot ana .oaota bo« .iXv , aoiXartoado dotf& .-'4 ;»# 0 'f/jJtt tta>«'<«4foxft to td^^deirio of .ffvu «j^.x XXe 4»ii4 to a« xliisipcfix ••IX bJS ,itoMt Xai»tfl£ 9Mtl9 JatfS xifllaj »?not :fsa»> jrpviuf ew Xi« uti ot .»llt juodA ^1 t#«o BtoSottl XXa^ ,it ' " 'T1 ^ « »d jM/rm tLMm « «.»#i*oo« «*(oo-»x .aai/si®#! l« 6Xan a xii»iw taltiiutt ^ aobao^'^ «|« to arfi ui ti -ioX, A** -.rfiMclai; ^iriJfoO AXO •dT" «,a^oT •ifl'* A»|»iiaA‘«*fli»Xoir O0l9*ai*«fil« •.itsMO 4 lot iloot 4 <* ,“.»f«!itB )««aH matt x*aav‘\o at 4o« ,so aotiSilw ,«?- -,io«as l>a« oi tAoiq dooo »l xXoo tfot ai^oiftsatf «ix^ to »t«» ■ ' . "I ' ,i> ^ • -I dJl» BbatltX .••i7«^OQ»»iao» •id md ii3(to« AoXaitg' A caoi #-,xlno Bblolt bB^imlt alainpo oia#XvQ to ooo 1 #A*i<4* _■ ...X A WO-tY BUB \Bd7 .••snot ^OiAOXXot BA7 ^ttlrlBOBt al iiBt^BtBd *w’ ^aliU nummoo:* 9fBoi%ixB oi %oi «voajC , «!•« t^dSo XXa to' oJtw -ttOO ^AAtA#Xq to aAil oiB Bd9 to $u I Maid f no qir oa Jb» boA stAtot OMvxil to oqflooon oilff,*' • tAd .* oogA' XX a al .ifioAg to boa doXdw • oo‘boiA-^a'n«*Aoog ,ooA#dj ^AA ; tiAiltfr \iATcqtt«iAoo 01 AtvAiCii itAq yiotf tda jtot •^lOBK. OtACi ^Odl qilisO«Ollt KAOnOAOg Odl to •AOlllCBAYl Xot^lAA.A -AAOAd tAl 01 XAlAlAB il ^lX««noffOg loa a ‘^. *104^0 dOA# tOt 4#AtoY .llAOfflM I»0S0I4A«. IfAX 04{ ATOflf «?*' . OOHlOg tq tflBAOll iJ #41 bilA;,,%l ‘ r.oirlaig a o4 UXoo* a«OH rtgloa ,Bml iXJbol* 21 poetic genius of Shelley, But something of each, and a little of what none of them possessed at all, was Leigh Hunt*s portion. He ranged from Homer to the least and greatest of his own contempo> raries, and far enough into the future to shoulder into fame men of his own period in whom he detected genius not yet apparent. This appreciation of worth wherever lodged we see in his in- sistence, again and again, on the music of Spenser's verse fit to "make heaven drowsy with the harmony" ^ of it; on the beauty, then entirely neglected, of Chaucer's poetry, in whose hands, according to Hunt, it "burst into luxuriance like a sudden month of May . • • and rises in the land like a clear morning in which you see ever^i 2 thing with rare and crystal distinctness;" on the supremacy of Shakespeare over the "improvements" of Dryden. Not only, however, did he understand those that had gone before; but authors of his own time, whose unrecognised genius fell under the ban of "estab- lished" criticism, were championed by him into a measure of self- confidence, This was no small thing. Many a man, less unselfish, would have climbed to his own fame on the stepping stones he laid; instead he allowed, encouraged in fact, others to mount them to their fame.. Not only were Keats, Shelley, and Wordsworth his debt- ors; but Tennyson could look from his laureatship and see Hunt's recommendation; and Browning could feel Hunt's touch of kinship because he, before others, had recognized promise in "Paracelsus." Besides his wide learning, and the happy taste for extricat- ing the uncommon from commonness, and giving it an underlook of 1. "Imagination and Fancy." p, 64. Smith Elder. One vol. 2. "The Seer." Specimens of Chaucer, No. L. f ‘I? I =~? 5 nateT ■ ** fV k V. ^ »9 * too* ,d04*# \o ^a^4J»ico« ina ,tiif*jia >o^«iiaf|^oi*iiio 03^1 utftiakv tftfiow to noitfploaTqqp ai 4 f , OJ »ll «L.» ••■.»»«.<,£ Yb, Oi.aa .J [••Bl .xJiuetf Of} ao iJJ '♦o ^ •tooBLO oo^Loa 4iOB" liaitwooop ,«A^4ui OAortw nz .^uooq a’jiopyp«p tj .Atioalsaa . 5(aV to Utaoiff Pol>ipt « tiZZ.,., . aoaointiJWX o?aZ Jt'iwtf*' zl ,ia«R^O# horo «#a foq liolriw «! afliatpir laoXo 4 t>;Zit Ottii 'tfi *#«Z t" jJaa^, ! ro xosa^tqfiB 9df ao o%»aS^aii%kb Sainx-^i^ ii^lv ^al 4 j ,*»»t#wop ,qI«o ipM .aottiCf t9 ’♦^eJ^iaaratotqta'^ •'ll tfri> Wi»q*i>3^ • irt to AroHi^f^ ^40 ?»;xott4 toon baA. jMdf o^aoiU ^o4#«^•^ap, v| bf^‘ i: oi- o^pjttt aZ Oo:^ai^#op 4 »ov,ZiowoXX« -aii baattaZ ’ . 1 . -• _ ,. /y li •tfajB#*' to aarf *ij. ^aXrao i £pt » nujiat^ iioa tasoOoxOiu Siooiw , '^Zl^jMra '' £ ^ ' *, ■ ■ jt. -tloa tc ••s«a«ttor a oJ«i Dt4 <><»^«Zqia^o ata* %isiol* i'io\*'A*itpZZ ortaZtloia,!/ «««X ,^^0 4 ^'oalit ..|»Zuj xra«« ,t . •optZ>ZtPC/0 ; 4 Zai «4 «p 4 Xo^*j.aalqqaii‘^ ac oatat nao «ixi: bi,i»# 4 «iX p^^tvail Mapv '*; k i dij .* j ?> tZiX zf/toa>olkToW Z^aa . ^liixXaiiil ^ , a7a«]l'- qipty ^ix^o iJciJI ■ JzfajH «»• ib)(sa. qiaataaf pal ' al4 mbit :iobX t»:|aoo mo^^aaaf jr,»p ^iiio ■ ' - ' "‘ '» S •>: f " "-§>•- ;' ^ If ••^rTxni { 119 ) tiiu6o^%etiaiit9^i boM. I »' 1 7 ’ ,r ' ^ ^ ■ ^ ■ * ' ' (fr '.r w 1 n o 0 iyAX« 0 * 4 *t 4 «i«^ .az^ »nX«o\q[t b»«XaaOb#i Aa 4 iV, #Toxiio.:\,aiotob^ oa«ao»d f V 4 A I " ■ ' 'i •' . ,. . * ^ ' ■* 'i'4 • It- • -<•.'( .,, i '6> , i ;, « -»*0 XiJkSc#^ taa'.^aifl*u4l oftZw «4tt BofiiaaS ^ I «»A' ‘iK, ■j, -t.fr #* 'i to iooX nil tf X ^.alvX^ baa ,«»fanommoo most ^mommo pail VbX sai ^ S !■ , • If'’ «.• ' *, .lOT hixXi ,X>d .q •.qpapt Jt^as ao|iaaipaml**^ ,-t- Mt,'', '»* • oH o IP paabp '' to >a ppi "?t#pa Pitat =^ 5 =aeri.' X, 22 conscious wisdom, as he says of Lamb, Mr. Hunt did muoh in the fields of creative and critical literature. The dividing line, however, between these two literary Interests is not always clear- ly nor easily distinguishable. Often his creative and critical faculties, like mischievous twins, wander over the fields teasing- ly linked arm in arm, until we are not certain that either is not the other. But for purpose of logical treatment and clarity, we may, by allowing some overlapping, group the material we wish to examine under these two heads. If giving us the sweets of other writers flavored with the charm of his own personality were Mr. Hunt's only contribution to literature, even then, those who have not the temerity to adven- ture in unknown fields of romance and poetry without a guide, may well feel that Mr, Hunt is very much worth while. But fortunate- ly for the more adventurous, that is not the measure of his serv- ice; and neither is it the extent of his work,^ In many of the essays scattered through the pages of the "Sxaminer," "The Indi- cator " and "The Companion," "The Seer," "The London Journal," "The Liberal," The Hef lector," "The Tatler," "The Chat of the Week," and "Leigh Hunt's Journal" we detect very little if any of a critical attitude. To this list of periodicals we may add such books as the "Autobiography," "The Town," and "The Old Court Sub- urb." And very entertaining reading matter may be found in the compilations made by him and called "One Hundred Homances of Real life," "Readings for Railways," 1850, and "Readings for Railways," 1853, 1, B, B, Johnson, "Leigh Hunt." pp. 116-135. I V •4J at rfQtrH •I'* JO ,'hob»lv nu^tdHUQO ® -.7 - ' iS . ♦frftU ♦dt .♦“fttftitdll uT^ail MO '>n* to •fclolt" ‘liolo ;ofl *1 t't****^^i flotwiod ,i*vo»oxi '•■' 5 . ' •■ t laoirlte tniM i»ylt*«*to €ld ,0SfiMd»lP^tii9hIb^ %XtOM9 toa il ffi ' . V ** Ddi««0J ftOItit «d 7 1 tiro KotoAo tuoroloeil* tKII ,*6i7Xi70At :oa »X nvil^lfr alAinoo foa ono •« XXiatr ,di ctron . , ittXqq«Xi*To »«o« adXooXio %d I 4 . ' .■*:. . : _'■ •^i »«b«>d owi_ oOddI it^ao 0aimM.xo 3 . - 1 - v,V| f jH' J, --A*. 01(1 olio tiotc r^tl •fO^MV todilo lo COOOVA 01(1 «#adXOXl 11 07 aoXlodXtJiioo \Xoo .iJI onow fjXXoaooloq iTO" tid lo «^o4o 3 ! .' -’16 j.' .aoT0» 0t Yiiioffoi oni 900 ovao oa» oiod} ;ao47 oori ^oioiavoiXX V f ’ *® '*■ Xov fObioa A MOdiXv xilooq bns scaiunoi to tUXoil (|tj ott4ad a X 4147 -oJoroliol iaa ,oXI<(» 44t#li do^a 7ooB .tM • Y 101 *14 to 0 X‘»A» ^.rf’xow #.Xd to 9iio«Jto od^ li fX todjAAd • ■■ a ' ' 5( ' #.lfciiX ortT»* "MooX^AAii** odj lo 40»aq ofit datf0«4i bon»«7»o4 otAO*® '’.Xos’inoX. QObAOJ Adt** ’•1009 edT** «* ^noXoAqoioSt odCt" ^MOildo - r-u ' ''M tnU lo JodO o4f 10X40? odT** * , loiooXtort o4?^ ♦• . Xaitdia o4T»; to xaa 11, olttiX xioo iooioO fo *'X»9iBeU'o’7a*/l? AiftXoJl’^ fciio,^,4#'0t ifrf’ff bOo xoa ov olAciiboi loq • 19 ialX oidJ of ,obtfli!^70 laoXiltO 9^ U*f3 ^*t*oO bi^ •«?“ ftao ”*0wOf 0AT« »*^*xdq«iiJ9Xoo7 aA»''^odi ,»• odood ©47 bX bnoot tso to« l#77«« a«Xb**i »fl lnlj|4l*7il0 HX0Vo*xq;'*'cAd #if ©n^ ff©^*t#od o> ,3ol Vor-i©ad-8«4l bdn boJrirtf-iiiiXliSdf oojitX^ 70V 4"J©» idall « 10 «OKttl*ffi .»i#d#o c« XI#lr ••^iXoaiBld to a/*iilO«*d ■»-* « ' ' 4* '*' ,osj»© trwo' ©'oao^lo ajoIXio/vp&A italViOft «dX 7 ol ^o'la ««a« 0 ti^tVoiii(o 1 « iiH .«70ddo 70l 0 t 9 fHxi» 9 miM ^OXiiqAd m lo olt«a #4# 970 fiaolJOAOOa oood t>c\o ooltfoao oitXl 0 ^ b^%^(jL # 7 o 0 :ga 4 j#X 7 lr « •■' rjj « , 04 o #«0 jifilVoX x* 7 ««t{ A 4 coTio 7 Xbds iXA0la4i #40 f f ' \ . 7 . ' V t:. , . 7 . I -oibalv oJ aofl^ #o« am^ o .ooa iiOO} a »ai^txaqsA u oala Xod oiiir -. . . rt/VTw. A0» XO^H .7M nodX .ofaitoo ttf/ R^vad bltxbk, atoffAidOAtao© ltd lo tmoa iffe ?- Xoa iblt oooXq too oeix •ao'JX«adaa bna noixodio daiw v’iottold bbaxAo ;* . J^' ^■- «rii 0i aXIla ‘coaa^q daa $Aaq voa o«, o««lX’ doi;a 3 ^ ,dt»aat 7«X^«n ? r 1 ■ V 1 .xoOAt 60* aoiXoal^iBi 'i 6 * iA%lt a«l70X|«> aaodX o<# 00X4X0700 XO0 070 QXoooo aid lo o«oo xooqaot blA^ 0l jn oto XMO90 3 ^bl 3 tX 9 lo Xl|> 07«7 rdx &a 4 ffom itxof 0 im.H' Abf’ibAQ to viodx oXxOvo fe#t7jf4-x4ji| a ol ooUUoXflix 301'' r. - , ^ aoitiatp 01 00 #0oW al .»l|l lo usoidx: xao^OOA odX OX aoxio '' ,ft ' ,} tMsa Aotti» '^tetud lo OOflijoIt oaodi'oox^ 0»o» ooiit^if«4«oo fo ydisiAj ' 00 ;^ ol | 05 M>Xi« t>oo oIXc a« ftOfC .o^jjImo fto# oXoo 9 0 iac!‘ 77 i'' atdtoo Sr, It . a ■ MP W- j’i*' 24 illusive essay on '*01d China,'* discussing '»the good old times, be- fore we were q^uite so rich,*’ make us ashamed of our uneasiness for luxuries unsatisfied, so Hunt with a delicate and fine touch pierc- es our selfishness, convicts us of our uncharitableness, and puts to rout our self-indulgent fallacies. Just as Mr. Lamb with his wisdom in levity makes us recognize a brotherly consideration for mistakes and circumstances; so Mr. Hunt with a jovial hilarity ban- ters us out of our moroseness, and quickens in us a livelier con- sciousness of our blessings and everyday duties. Though Mr. Lamb's achievements may be of a higher order, Leigh Hunt’s undoubtedly come nearer to human nature; if Lamb was more pithy and brilliant. Hunt possessed greater sincerity and earnestness. Much of Lamb’s peculiar charm arose from a certain whimsical far-awayness and del- icate romanticism that hardly touches our actual experience, while Leigh Hunt’s sentiments and characters are literal transcripts, sifted and composed, but not touched up,^ Neither the characters, nor the world in which they move are artificial in Hunt’s writings. And it is this reality, this at-one with ourselves in our own ev- ery-day world that gives what he describes a place in our hearts. From the creative to the critical is an easy transition, if transition it is; for the difference between the two is not al- I ways clear, nor definitely marked. Mr. Hunt, we are sure, was not born with a critical technique, and it was not in his nature to acquire one. He was born with attitudes and tendencies: attitudes to receive, tendencies to praise what he liked. Someone has kind- ly called him the "Ariel of criticism." And this was certainly ri 1. R. B. Johnson. "Leigh Hunt p. 119. pcaini '^iTi '".'Mlfc iJiMU l„ ,««ai} IXc M»o» ♦‘.jialrfO fcXO*‘‘^i»o »t1«oXIX fv ■ -. rrol tatfiXsAAffs nao lo «c' OB x«l -* ,* i D ' - «x«q ham * 16m 3 IxAtioatt , xao lo mu •^oivaoo , 0 # ^two te’ If , '■ '« • Id dtlm df^ti .Ttu mm Jmvl, ,mhlomllm\ ^d»sXo^ai-.tX#« too iaxiH m3 ■v^ 'fy 1C1 noJJ . TottM ^ « • clasoo *! is iijua at « 66 ii « -n»« {«iT«t « till, inDK ,tu «• U*o«sJiSBsjl» »« 4 . isitsiiiw -*fl05 'isXiovll x «0 ai t>ax ,Bc«a#iotoa t»o" to 300 mm h ri e'dftAa .tM A^uoaf .molJuJb hnm •f.aliBtXd tiro'^^o ct«a«doXoa I? ' fl» ; M* ^T' • vXt*«frfoi>i>nir •'JotfK d^lmj ^\mbno a i« \Mm . m3 amsimrmUmm I - •• " .xaxiUiid bcm xdJXq m-iam mmm unmj Jl fiosma mmmud if ididta Bmoo V ,r •d»4a 10 rtum .mmmafmmaxmm baM xSlxmuaU bimimmmoi -Ub 4as siisxsss.ist Xsotiat^^. qtsjueo a noil lioia ^-satfs nall^tp#^ ffX 14 v * 1001 X 11 ^x 1 lasica iso asitosoj \Xbiari Xaax aiX0t#04(iai 'ixapl 'J alqldof barn mobt/flj fm dS ir a%0v mmw\^ ^muo 'mi lap om g^tt maooxtQt sAfliX md fmdv mmUxq OJ mmlaambao* .mtlhomt^^ i '1. «rit. f. t XiaJMiimo BMW t:id^ ■■dm Xpiti* $df mU boUmo ql 'Ift,, i-. ^ . e t X‘ ,q •*’*. Iff «4I • vl |^ 4 ao Afficlp 1 » , «■ n: .1 . < .1 T 1 iWtfriitilAi '*'' 25 true in that he was not confined by the "cloven pine" of "estab- lished" criticism. professor Saintsbury, by no means always kindly disposed to- ward Hunt, says that "His criticism is very distinct in kind. It is almost purely and in the strict and proper sense aesthetic-- that is to say, it does hardly anything but reproduce the sensa- tions produced upon Hunt himself by the reading of his favorite passages."^ This may not be .--certainly was not at that time, the "established" mode of criticism; but since the selections he made for the two volumes, "Imagination and Fancy," and "Wit aniHumor," are the result of this kind of criticism, and since these select- ions reveal a sense extraordinarily keen and accurate, we may con- clude that his insight was "safe" enough for the sort of criticism he attempted. In another estimate of Hunt, Mr. Saintsbury states that "He has left a very large range of critical performances, which is very rarely without taste, acuteness, and felicity of ex- pression; and he has, as against both (Hazlitt and Lamb) the great- er critics Just named, the very great advantage of possessing a competent knowledge of at least one modern literature (Italian) be- 2 sides his own;.., in truth, nine-tenths of his criticism is admir- able, and most admirably suited to instruct and encourage the av- erage man." Even Lamb, in his own favorite authors and subjects misses much which Hunt unfailingly discovers. He may not always give you a valid reason for his conclusions concerning the beaut- ies he has Just pointed out, but for very many readers a true o- 1. Saintsbury, "English Literature, 1780-1860. p. 223, 224. 2. Saintsbury, "A History of Criticism," III, 246. 3. Saintsbury, "A History of Criticism," III, 250, 251. r lo •ofljtq at^XQio* to i)*al»aoo lo« «a« lAil/ a| »ai3 T Jj .i>alX «1 Jottliali ottolJlt© i ,iajrt{ l>i«w E - ■ '* -■ - . ... ’ . '■■ -^i «»aeti t«^c*iQ ioliin al has 'gl^itrq iseuls «i -Aiaf^e icd »aiaj\taB ■•oli o^ •! \ » Aiijt to ul3 tXo«*i4 ^airH aoql» l:'Ooai>o*T<{^' ©tfoi if i c 0U3 .♦AlJ JiliiJ ;* Joa’oBw x^aUlToo-*, »d toa %Mm tiat fb»a ad oaoi^o^Xot #d.l oooia tzosloli^lto to oBoa "b^dAlIdAtBo** ^ « I k , ,# t I **, 'to .ail'll dlW** Ba« *',xoaat 6 oa aoltaal^ril** ,AottBlov o«;t odi aet 'h'' • I f ^Li -7o«i#a attJdJ ooald boo to bald •‘iif to iXi/a#t od;! otof IW, , -doa^taa •»» ,07«ttf0o« bam a,i»»% xHtaalbtoa^^xo #sa»« • |d*T#t tfirOl' ««ltoA 10 1 dtirooo a«» •'id’’ laiiJ * •baio t ' *■ » • * T* * * J iJ i‘ - f I m • 'If i 10 bam ,«aoao40oa , ar',#d 7irod*iw tXo*JAt t**** •-^ JtbXdw r jioJiU* ttaoitflioa ,tH .iitaS tc lii .b#;Tq»ti . , , ; '■ .. J r . ’{’•: .^, ., /;• I , •ioaAflnotioq Imoiflao to osaAt fturwl » 3tmt 9md iR»* tMfi3: md3 idmad bam sUlmmU) Aiom JmaimsM tm , a«d 4ti bam tao immaiq ^ K . ' -5i.,r ^14 m j^aiMuammoq to obmfamvbm irnma^ t‘**» .fcomaa .,#•»(; molSltm i# k. ► / ’ • . I ' -od taaiXB7l) maammirntii dtobom #iio^ immmt fm to oftbolwoaal iamimqmob • almbm ml mmiolalta aid to ma9am^-mala ai ,,Jjawo tld Mblo^ ' ^ il 93^ •d'^ ojBttfOoao baa ioai;*anl o9 bfSiva ^IdoTlmb#'- 7io« baa ,«l.ds ttoal^am bam it^ontttm odxiotat awo airi qi ,d»aJL aoraV o^diw ,i " ^ '■« mxuwl» ioa \mn oS .•toToo^ib ^iBaiXlatac 4lol4»» dofl« Boa»l« •f * f «.. _.■ •.»caa«j aitj dOlat^occ-o aoolaaioaoo aid tot aoaaoi bllmr m vax •^I'B -0 oj/13 a ait^baoa vJboi t*ttv aot 4«d »dwo ^baJaiot jaal e«d od aal ,3’ ' ''' ~ i'*~^.-. iit ’ '' — ’ ' ■ ''ll — ' > — “iMBIWilWilfaB ’■ ^ II ,tS^ , tbi. .t •Obdi.^OGf I * 4 ill d^XL'sa.k^ fX%adm$ttJim^ ,L .dbS .ill **,4»aiomi0' to A*' **, tt«d«lolaB ,1 A4% ,111 -.mtioXtliO tO'X'*o3«lE A** , xtadadaitafl , d ssssBxssse 3c-.nyr'*^ MitOBniJiari •sr. j»' ,r^ 'j. Hr* , 26 pinion persuasively stated is of much more consequence than the most logical Justification for it; and it is this persuasiveness that makes Leigh Hunt*s criticism such excellent reading. According to Edward Dowden the '♦best criticism is not that which comes out of profound cogitation, but out of immense enjoy- ment; and the valuable critic is the critic who communicates sym- pathy by an exquisite record of his own delights, not the critic who attempts to communicate thought.’* One wonders what would be- come of most critics if that became a "rule-enforced,” But Mr. Hunt would stand very high, would, indeed, be the best of critics; for certainly no criticism was ever the outcome of an enjoyment greater than his. Other critics, of his own circle even, undoubt- edly had a firmer intellectual energy, a more vigorous close-reas- oning faculty; but there is none of the race of critics who se- lects with such unerring and delicate tact, or recommends his finds to the enjoyment of others with such insinuating persuasiveness as Leigh Hunt. He holds open the door in the house of Literature, and with a smile that illuminates the Beauty within, invites us to feel once more the thrill of contact with that which each of us, in our heart of hearts is seeking. asJi noanaptmaoc ♦t&Q dotM tp ui %X §vi itolxriq a ■ l<«ta#rxia«r*'i#<3 ildJ »i /i bail wi lol «0 Itf Jkol 1 i»t X*©I»oi ^to« • I 1 1 . 9 alb 4 »*i Japllpozp d&at rftioXJine t'loaK i}« 4 ^ 7©4j JOfl «i Bill oXyltc- Jtifl*’ ptif itPbwoQ Of iaib-Joo©4^ ^ ~for««» paapmmi Jttp iof ,apts*4l<^pp bawotsm \o ipo ••■oo 4olii« ^ . * ''’ - 1 . •rt* i#4«oiaaarattoo o«iw oi^Xtio •i.oii’ito elcTjirXnv pdt ba» rlfito aili J©« awo ailf lo bi©a«v ailaiiifz* nd vX4«<| '’ • i, . ! *■ ’ -•d bieom i^aw §tpJ>aom pao ".jd^crcAj td6oladi««Q© <3;^ odp * O " flit m o;ico»d t/ni XL^pplxLnp. $*oa pmoo , ' , W '• '*^’ .> t S' :«owZio lo tppa pm «d ,bo»baI ,l)|ao« ,rtaid fT«v LMiiia hjpefw da»B ■|t fc >alx pld abaoieiroooa lo ,iopi aimcHpA o»d IcXtiorra doff# d^ottX m* •••ttOYlodJroidiy aalddi/iildci dona u^ln aidOdo lo iTatiyf,o(.®t odi’ pi .OTotdiaxU lo* eaffod ^d 4 ai 'ioob od 4 *^«oj© aMra oK .JatiB P 9 Off tfajXmi .aiaaxw ♦dl fo^d«iir«UX jadj i/if da 4?iw jfead tiv la 4 foao ifol 4 v d^iw doaJitoc lo odi o'f'OiK •aaif Idfl j •9°X4»«a alidad ;i,o jr_iaod ;idd «i ryO -,11 t u' ■; ' t. rf* ^ ■vdv » » •w ■ ^ .■ "* f “^ itik ' S’ f If * .''''-A .-» t ^^'4 ' ? ers for the relief of laughter and smiles that break through tears. Some we admire, others we love. Of txie former we have the epic, the tragic, the heroic, and of the latter the lyric, the romance, the essay. To trace the genesis of the essay, and follow it in its his- torical development from its beginnings to the time of Leigh Hunt would lead us far from our present purpose.^ For us it is only needful to state that the essays of Hunt have an unbroken geneOvl- ogy. Sometimes it is said that Hunt was a belated eighteenth cent- ury essayist. This may be accepted with sufficient reservations. It is true only in so far as it was his purpose to foster a finer taste for literature; in this he was in harmony with them. But the 1. Accounts of the Essay may be found in the following: “The English Familiar Essay,” edited by W.F, Bryan and R*S. Crane. Excellent historical and critical introduction and good bibliography. “The Essay,” by Orlo Williams (Art and Craft of Letters) “The English Essay and Essayists,” by Hugh Walker. “The English Essay," in SOCIAL STUDIES by Laura J. Wylie. Ill j <4 *«.,# &iAC! ; #iir7ff|oi iX lo aiTto) alMlni^o to owa 004 | 00 %^ jl fra«t« off ” p ■ } ~ *, *8,1®*' #«o»» of • i * xa 1 limait aalj^uooftotffoo liilv doMo^qqm ow^iifiljo o; ;ol 4 q Jtfoi 4 i'\o t*»o fctr® aoltoaq to - - fc- .feT4ol d^jroKfi^ ;to6id Jaoi ioXijBc boa lo^tisnol to tnii^n TOt' *it .ciq-o oflj otr#ii oo ^oontot oKi t;; .otrox‘’oir »oodJo .onX^nAo %m kmcfix ' 'ra_ * .•cnfecrOi Odir .aZnqX ^dJ lotfool tdi to boo .oIoioU ort^ ■“■ vl''> ' ,i ■ %im ■■fr\ p. "•*^.1 Ji. wollot bao ,\acto to tlt#a*4 o<5i VodTt oT t I .. ■■ V'-OTt dt4#j tp fai^ odi Oif o^alfLalDtO ^aoarq[ol'ovob X^oX^xdt £ XXaq *i *4 loq .oeoc'Sffq yaoto^^ rwo iro'rt -lot oa bikoXrbXff^w -Xoooo'fl aoiio'xdao a« otarf 7ad^ to o^ala XctJloec^ '' ii ^jaoo a^aoo«(ij|£o AeJjIod a «a« Xaxfji jfgdf blat ol ?I ooflidonolfi .xfio . onolXoTtoaot XatloXUtVa itlXv.baiqopoa oo t<*® *T ’* mi i "o4* 3o« ,mtas dXtw x^omiaui al aao o4 $ld7 at r ot«'#«tol 2 X^tot od«a;£ ' I ..- ■ ;„■. jns.v i^ait 1 to^^tot, 9d toQqiaq old «««r tat oo al r^iad atn$i%t 4Ztj S»' ■,*.» ■ I cg r .j r ^ „ ,,;, "' ' H i'- t'rit‘v , s a gic r i a a;tf' 4 | ^ \ : y,i>^ Xr a ^ besty-othe Laigh Hunt eleraent»> in his essays, was the charity that delights in the humanity of others. All his observations, whether on books, on men and women, or on nature, are the outpourings of his personality, the leanings and strength of his humanity. Very little of what his pen has portrayed is not touched with affection, with sympathy and understanding. Is it asked, '*What of Lord Byron?** Even what he said of Lord Byron is not without a background of gen- erous impulse. There is matter for a kind of impatient amusement in all that has been written concerning Hunt’s criticism of Byron, ^ One wonders sometimes, how critics who praise Hunt for having the courage to say of Byron what he alone could say, and in the next breath blame him for saying what he said, reconcile their own at- titude toward Hunt, or rather toward their own irreconcilable at- titude. And this sort of straddle-aspect criticism is not infre- quent among those who try to place Hunt. Pity it is, but amusing. If Hunt could only have given to his writings a chameleon quality, enabling them to reflect the color of the critics, he would not be praised for his honesty of intellectual opinion and then blamed be- cause that honest Intellectual opinion wasn’t the intellectual o- pinion of the critic. But of Lord Byron, and Hunt’s opinion of him: Hear what Mr. Hunt has to say about it himself. ”If any man, after reading the whole of my book, be capable 1. The following sources may be consulted: •’Morning Chronicle,'* January, 1828 ; ’’Examiner,** 1828, p, 57. "New Monthly Magazine,'* for 1828, p. 84. "The Athenaeum," 1828, pp. 55, 70, 71. **The Tatler," vol. 2., 1831, p, 441-2. And sea also "Leigh Hunt’s Relations with Byron, Shelley and Keats," by Miller, and the numerous references in the foot- notes of the same vol, on pages 116, 117, 118, 119, and 120. Kil’iAdo MV -iiA fti --tfaviRtit fatm I • ' r'' ,^acUAttot itryH ttlu'tq od* aoi ll^o'jpoii ,s*«tslivM^4 •txtbxtow 'OaO 9tQii odj tti Ittb ftiooo affold 0 (f lad* aox^'s lo **iixaoo a,vo nitfdl *Upaoc^t «d fxdv itpt |Jl*t ordltf -J» oXOailoaooonti nvo alprtJ bxawdi xofifat to , ?»i/ll| -oxtcl Joa «1 *ajp||;iio loo^aa^albbax^o^' lo ^id . K#od n» to gion* #di ^albaOx x«rita nxid tl” >UL k tboiXBaaoP od <(40 ••oxooa baI*oIXo 1 #d? ,l .?*i *q , BbdX ** , xffllBjaaE" lOfiX *TX*aaiiat •* « eXpIaondO daXasott** * .X^e^q . 04 iSt n^t xXdl«dl&(^* 0 H< ,,, .XV ,OT . ud .qj-0 .^'BX *^'t»5if#aa#dld fd®'* ''*■ ,q ,XCdI ♦.& .I’O# •'♦TofidS ddl* fcna ,aQ«rf5( diiw oafpXi«X#R d^lM* V#l* #e« bai -loot #dl Hi booirutotoir oDoiowaa odt b«* ^^tllld tds]*'. ftiaoX* ’* .0£X btf/ .2X1 « SIX »1*li ,0XX «094i';| ad*^* XoV oAjr*r#di to ««loa 29 of thinking that I have uttered a single thing which I do not believe to be true, or that in what I have uttered I was prompted by any impulse incapable of a generous construction, he is speak. ing out of his own instinctive meanness, and his own conscious want of veracity; and I return him any epithets he may be inclined to bestow upon me, as equally unfit for me to receive, and himself to part with. If anyone can convince me of an error, -- I am not in love with error, but with truth — I will gladly rectify it. ... Finally, if any one asks me what it is that supports me under the trying circumstances, in which I have to work out (as becomes me) the remainder of my days, 1 answer, that it is my belief in the natural goodness and capability of mankind, and the testimonials borne to my endeavors in consequence by the love of those who know me most intimately, and the esteem and good will of those who pub. licly agree with me.**^ To this extract from his own defense may 2 be added a comment by R, B. Johnson to the effect that "Candid re. viewers at once admitted that he (Hunt) had given *a far clearer and more consistent view of the character of Lord Byron than any other writer,* but they seemed to feel that * these revelations* would have come with better grace from any other hand. This is undeniably true, but it should be remembered, on the contrary, that had "Lord Byron and His Contemporaries" never been written we shoul have lost, what some of at least would have been very unwilling A to spare, a most intimate and life. like contemporary impression of the author of "Don Juan"; and a number of charges against Leigh Hunt would have remained unanswered, and, perhaps, unanswerable. 1. Leigh Hunt, "Preface to Second Edition. " 2. B. B. Johnson. "Leigh Hunt," p. 49, 50. iff at ojt I AoiAv T^altii •t^wl "l >J•‘|li^ b^iqoetiiq I cvjiy I 3»nw ul ^Q ^Aaxi od od tr#jLl«tf •TUAflt Ml'^vd , AO Utipx 3 ititc A ««ot®at»n H ’^0 #Xrf^qjiool ««Xi/q«X ^as qrf Jn«w MPoJouAop cr«o okd bit^ ,9i#Aft»em •»lJcaXJ«aX tid to 3uo ^ai 03 Availvoi ed XAa »fl •deiii'lq# ^q» kirt i>aA ' »xJ|o-■ ' >or« 01 ts lot li taa « •• • e« aOqo . «od«»d i ,® ► ■ ’^- .* ff/. i Af* I — as >0 om ooaitcoo a«t> •ao^rwi. tl dr^A? . .. ..j,l xMippn Xliw I —.dittos diiw'iod ',ioiiA a^pl cdi ia.AA wq ^Jioqqif* 3ad3 »l di j«c:» aUa o«c xca tl I ofli t0£Mo*e aAl ico iio» oi aviui I gj » **oai»iJimpoiX o |mbXxii1-, . - *■■, ,*-' M* ’’ ♦ill di \oU0d xm fi #1 fmii ,xo^oa I ,o%Kb to' oit# j '4 ' ■■ . y a elaJacoiaa*# »oa 0>«wid4lJ laoa A 'ioiAqa’^d iwcl&fiA a«si«4o to’^ a | doff** tiS© 4 dt/* 049 . ■ ® '*t ' . 0l0Ai ®y_ftnA ap ,oqArtt«q ,kn» .>oi#v*aAJJo a««a*A*'i «^«d ^'idXwoir 1 «Wh '7..' „ 1 ' K'C ••4 i «df n •*.Koi>i£«a i>r»oo#e or •dAtVw >rowB daioa ,x .0<3 bHi^uaddi ,d *h ,, 30 No one else was both able and willing to conduct his defense, and he was thus driven to act In his own counsel. ••• and there is no reason to regret any part of the affair but the heated and persist* ent abuse with which one of the most tolerant and humane men has been loaded on account of it.'* But to return to the writings of Mr. Hunt which are not only truthful, but pleasing as well. **The Animosities are mortal, but the Humanities live for ever.**^ And so the pathos, and humor, and wit of Leigh Hunt will live when all topics of temporary irrita- tion have expired. Leigh Hunt was the prince of anthology makers, not the bring- er-together of •’golden” treasuries, nor of golden treasures such as "Hail, to thee blithe spirit,” "Had we never loved sae blind- ly,” "The world is too much with us,” "Sunset and evening star,” or "Helen, thy beauty is to me"; this too he could certainly do, and did do; but more truly, he was the gleaner of the unf orge ttabl( treasures in existence itself. As we read through his pages much we find that is common, but all taken together there seem to have been comparatively few pages in his book of life whereon he has not left print or record of the life he lived, the beauty he saw, the joy he felt, the hope, the regret, the love he sheltered or con- fessed. Most fittingly, most entertainingly, most unguardedly he has told us how the faint winds of thought and fancy have blown ov- er his experiences until they yielded him Aeolian music. 1. Christopher North, in a full and complete apology to Hunt in "Blackwood’s” for August, 1834, p. 273, for that magazine’s slanderous articles against Hunt and the friends of Hunt. oas •111 loofcaoo o^ BfliXiiw Ja* ®Xtf* tfi»e>o »aw%V|© #00 ox oa l>tMl * .. .Xtkawoo a*o tia nX ^oj> aevixB ai?4l^ saw , " ' I- iui.i.c »a».4»»6M •«# lad ii«i-»« oa> ^o i«q a* ao««*t ,,„ «•/< s«a »B4oea ta< io*it9tpi }»om »i3 to *ao,aota« Utiw 9»uPa, ia» to fattQCDM ao h^tAOi Ct^pd % Xiar jQa •!« TCVU .111 ^0 #saiti%iw atuiot oi ,io€ & , ... 7.^ mxm pptiipOt^taj^ .IltW •« »al«00fn J»/tf A04R‘ ,iaai0ii UaM 0 tif f ,'vi'’^ ^ Hl0i04i0o .bluoo td oof tidf i'i^r o /.*4 '?lw 0 wti ,«©X 0 B»» tO ,p4ij^ p.aiolpa «tU.)o ‘l•a.a»XB' oitw oa *tXsn4 'Utom ^'fats i«a«i soa./.lz. «i oivmVi/ »vj« oj eee« .t.aa ».d»»i«4 o»z*» £X» »«« .Boanrao alVaaa bnXt «o» »aa »4 BB.T.aw .til .10 *ood .id It tmt'i m,t odj ,w.« *d txdd.d td) .*o»n »a ttu'^ttu >« »Bae.,z BB »oXio%“*j J ' -apo *»a PoxtaStfiB wd 0TOX »rfi •Hd ,»qpif arf'j » "ft" V* Si’ ■*' ■' . "T^ur'x-v Ui 3 auM Of ihQloqmrbfoiq^aoo boo lltn "m,ai^Tdf-to^ xodlofi jj..> 1 .. 31 Leigh Hunt did not wander far for his subjects. The "ghoul- haunted woodland of weir" was not for him; neither did he lose himself in "faerie lands forlorn." The realms he wandered in were close at hand, the observations he made were about familiar things: he wrote of home and fireside, of town and country, of weather and the seasons, of theaters and clubs, of dumb animals and flowers, of dress and social amenities, of books and writers of books, of characters and kings, of tales in fiction and romances^of real life. But whatever subject he touched, whatever phase of it he chose to look upon^ was treated with intellectual honesty. What- ever he wrote had upon it the characteristic stamp of his own per- sonality, the ear-mark of his own intellectual reaction. He pas$- j^ed nothing off as his own that was not of his coinage. Mr. Hunt must have been a veritable encyclopedia of information, and with it all a tireless investigator; for much of what he wrote was mat- ter that req.uired immense labor and painstaking oare to present properly and honestly. We are told that Mr. Hunt was not a rapid writer; yet wo know that he verified all his statements of fact,^ Says Thornton Hunt: "His constant industry has been mentioned: he could work from early morning till late into midnight, every day, for months together. ... For the greater part even his recreation was auxiliary to work. He had ... heaps of information at his fing- er's ends; yet he habitually verified even what he knew already, 2 though it should be only for some parenthetical use." 1. One wonders how he ever got the facts for such books, for ex- ample, as "The Town," and "The Old Court Suburb." To the present day there is nothing better nor more readable on Old London than "The Town." £. Thornton Hunt in the "Introduction" to the "Autobiography." One of the finest tributes by a son to a father yet in print. -fOort-jo« ♦ffT Virol Joo bit jfxtfU tiiitd, 000 1 od kit tQdfi^a ;ata tot JOB to b# 4 «a«jd wraw aJ taiatnsw o4 aio/Bot oBT •.inoi**o\ o^aol •lioat* etJl tio»»lrf itcgoiiitf iao4a pd m/joZ^ci viotdo oB 4 .»bcL« 4 . 3p ppole Dnu to bo* o^ojt tov, •bZooall ba«< 0004 to oioiw Pt .«*rlrf ol •xUooBDA bap xX'tbfiopa . ?cot to *Jno 0 «.ZoJt slA Xio' boZti'so? ^wcWJt »w Jonj '■* , ffl f# jZ>iiaoi/tif« oootf iAt« t'xJ iami Pitbo 'kiB** t laan./dbiatbit \\pm / '^‘ : • tob xiPtp t tA’^labln Qiat pfal .Ctlv ^alatpp ^Ztoo iKOtl ttow bltroo .. .■ , aoifsPXi^Pi tit BOTf '^ioq 10J001J «A3 lot ,,.ia -tOu4 0*oJ oAJaop «ot J ' TT . ^/slt tZA 40 aolJ^totol to PqppM ... bo4 ?^itOw oj ^ « tbo«*xXo. ;Wox;)( loi(w ooTf i>4ZtZioT ZoOiZcioiA pp 4o\j>r ^^oboo o‘to , ”.o«o ImtUbd^MPtM^ PMOP tot ^iBO.od blirtHLp’ii dpaadk ®e-, . . 1 V ■ ■■ c- f. ,._^ .0 ■ . « • ■?■ .^'. S’ • *%V' 1 ' t. «Z tax toA4*t o oJ B 0 « o X** ' 4»««iti*K4 to 7 32 Another characteristic that stands clearly back of all that Mr. Hunt wrote is his moral honesty. With him this was akin to re- ligion. In his writings we find perfect truthfulness, alike of heart and intellect. an integrity which led him to sacrifice much, to invite misunderstanding, criticism and abuse. Moral hon- esty was so much a part of Leigh Hunt, that any account of his writ, ings which omits it is incomplete. Perhaps the '*Heligion of the Heart** represents more fully than any other single volume the re- ligious side of an essentially pious nature. It is a manual of as- piration, faith, and duty conceived in the spirit of natural piety. "And if anybody ask," he says in the Preface, "whether in other re- spects 1 practise what 1 preach, I answer, that 1 profess but to be a disciple in my own school; that some of its injunctions are harder to me than they will be to many; and that 1 pray daily for strength not to disgrace them." ^ Zindly emotions and a pure mor- ality, a true sense of the beneficence of God and of the beauty of creation, a heightening sensibility that shuns all contact with theology, and shrinks only with too much dread from the hard dogmas of the pulpit, make up the substance of the book, of which the style throughout is exquisitely gentle and refined. We quote to illustrate at once Hunt’s firmest conviction, and the very spring of his literary method: "As a family bound together in love and duty, even such are we incited to hope, that all mankind may become..... In this hope let us live, and let us rejoice, interchanging our comforts, di- viding our burdens, and in every way striving to show ourselves 1. How do the critics justify their criticisms of Hunt in the face of such self-criticism? There is much of this in his works. r V jsaat If ■ lift J«41J iln \0 •^aA^« .tjM^ oUml’t9i0BXMi\0 ’iik^ioaA I o; alT(» MW initU mid &HK dtd ti piciW^Uftm ,-sM ■Jp *ai4 Atjolilmp *%tli'i>aa3 bam ilm w firm X •! tAtuai • in* «lji \9 ^eaoo'i* MBM .»,X'B B»l«a 10 •« ...V v^,# ' *’'■’. ■’ * ■ , ^riJ ^0 froiB>^^*8’* «rtt *jifil(in^oai i't lato tSbld^ mu I -«f etfBXov:' •iitti* atMJo \iX»l p-UHs -1ft -*• Ic XxCftX* ft fti *l .ftiftdfto tooii^ YXfftJiaft4 4fi «ft ftlfXs ftxiolBiX .tJ«l9«Vi I «/aftcjft- ftift •effoljDfiift.ai aji lo ftoidii ift4i iXpQJdOft :riro tt| ftXiiiofi.i^ • wa ^ ,‘£ ^**"*’. ' -w .01 ^Xifti * .*AXl? trtft :x«fte oi *d^ ili» a»iiJ w» vi -•IPC ftTOq $ tOM «0olios» xX6ffl2 . •* .tforfi -fterftKt^uiti »T fpit - Po^/i,o Oftflftonftcaij 0 fii tv M ^Xtltu '. _ * '1^ ' ' ‘'i ' , ® soBittPo XXft ftisad* iftdi ti*liaiftia a! ftXt'^jis ■ ' ' ■ Adi ftiijR .ttAidoiraoo ^^atfariXi i -• 4 T V.- >• il. xaaantlt eXa to ^ ■ <^t O'lft Afxstn rift 7 ft .x^Ofc Pfiift fVnX aJ t§A 3 t $'!^09 hnuoti xXldifll: ft 4 / ■ ' 0 ' •qod ftXxi ftr ...^.ewo^od XA«i Bttlt/rftjii I Xft ' « aqod Oftltpal • oif -IP cjUotooo ibObiBcl^ffJUioiviai .ooioCt:^ *u ioX |>^ 04 ^ »ovIX aff itX ‘ ■ r "i acYXeax^o. «^04a oJ a^XYlii* b: 1 i»dft ,iaftPiotf itfO ^albir i*“? 10 »»UsJjlis Il.dj »rt« ofc «OB.'.xV ■ .0*10 tJit «l «.d(^ip B.pa el i.iBdi, jTootbisjtie-’lJ*. itoK* to ' h,ii'‘‘^t -.S'" \> '‘i'-M 33 worthy of the heaven to which we ures as much as possible through . 2 them our enjoyments lookl^ ••• We must earn our pleas- the medium of others, sharing with Leigh Hunt insisted that it is man*s duty to exercise all the faculties^ with which he has been gifted^ in a sane healthy way. This he believed was the main earthly object of all social endeavor. This purpose of making men happy, and advocating that they make . themselves happy, is at the root of Mr. Hunt’s writings. Every- where he presses beauty into the service of man. For him it has a place in the universe only because it contributes to man’s happi- ness. And men and women in a world replete with beauty, should be good men and good women. That was the business of beauty: to make man happy, to give him pleasure. Leigh Hunt leads us into Edens of orchards of unplucked fruit; he tempt and with a deftness all his own keeps His choicest essays give us a sense of beauties on the borderland of dreams, and old tottering houses with coats of them all is the spirit of his sensuous ament, his Italianized imagination, a the abidingness of ’’deeds of daring re to **urge man’s search to vaster issues the chapter to a close with part of a literature; he takes us to s us with apples of knowledge from us the forbidden fruit. golden summer afternoons^ romance in Gothic archways arms upon them. And over nature, his tropical temper- sweet, clean, pure sense of ctitude,” of the moral duty .” Let Hunt himself bring sentence from his Preface to 1. ”Religion of the Heart.” p. 21. 2. ’’Religion of the Heart.” p. 31. 3. ”Religion of the Heart.” p. 16. tn -BAoXfl 'iffo* K*i*f iuta #w ... a^rBtd otfi to tdl-^ow ' ' t# * f*' '"» '" '^' [Jli j •iViOttOq Aaats^hm n^ta ‘,<1^ %, 4 5 lie ... aj'a«ein;ot,xi« ti$ 0 ^^ . ~Zi9VI :A^Blstnm 9*4auTi .<«• to rooi Mi Ja"tl rt Ji wid *^t '.tt44 to‘ aolvioo odi o;al; ^^stsvb -lc't^i«a *'f(Aifi oi •('iM iiiaoo il odootfo^-^^oo ootovtau fdi di ocijiX^ ' ' k ' ■ ' ' 'W ^ ‘If I ’ *"**■ i 5L*'^ ''' ' §d %ivod^9 dilw oi-oXq#i i^X'xow^t fll ao«oiJ^‘‘ia4 tto» i - ,. oi oB jotoMtom to AaMU oitt.i .«« MJ#! iiis diXM to aOXqqo Ailw 9B oiq»oi^?d liXuTt JOofoJarfqoi;^ lo .iioat ftot'lrXOYot odi tir aort oq« 0 ]t ttwo tid Xio ••oaito* m Altvbaa lily •> • . I f oitoontoito toMJiqe aof>Xdi to ooiioo ardo •▼l.j i«*oXl>ita jiWiB ^ 'r. 3T 4X«Mo*t 4 sttiiof) rfl ooaaroi •;, Autaont to X>iK«liol»^^tod odi dO •oXii/**d1 •■ (JT i t»iro .modi aoqtf duiia to aiooo dfXw itWftsjod M^toiioi bXo M-a’^ "^ '. ' ’U .• -taQ«oi XacXqoti aM ,attriad »i/ooa«ot aid to iXtiqa o4i li lla «aili to tddat a-raq ^,o*«Xo «ioa«r« a .ooXi«oiia«X j.t#«X«44i4di aid ,iaaiBa , C , » M ' tiWk Za*iooi odt Xi> •’.aboiiiooi saXtab to to B«aa»«Ul<» 4 |#dJ UrtXtO tiotaXd ittoH ioj. •'^ aodABl ,.tf i «4v or oo^aiaa c 'aa« aittr** PI ' ,•■ ' • t i' oi ooatat^ fxa «ott ooaoiaoa a to iiaq sLflm aeoXo^a oi^taioado odi mm '■ IS« .*■ ■'’ q"?* * .H ' i r’ . !‘ - '? ^ .iS^.q “ti«a*Sl adi to aoi 9 l;Xan*''.xJ .15 .q **«iia#K aiii kto^ aoisiXoq** .s j ; 0 X *q adJ tblaoXulXViK^ . 34 '♦Meu» Women and Books'*! ••• "if there is anything which consoles him for those short-comings either in life or writings, which most men of any decent powers of reflection are bound to discover in themselves as they grow old, and of which he has acquired an abund- ant perception, it is the consciousness, not merely of having been consistent in opinion (which might have been bigotry), or of hav- ing lived to see his political opinions triumph (which was good luck), or even of having outlived misconstruction and enmity (tho the good will of generous enemies is inexpressibly dear to him), but of having done his best to recommend that belief in good, that cheerfulness in endeavor, that discernment of universal beauty, that brotherly consideration for mistake and circumstance, and that repose on the happy destiny of the whole human race, which appear to him not only the healthiest and most animating principles of ac- < tion, but the only true religious homage to Him that made us all," , * 1 « B nS^ «»£o«ootj dttdv -^altUxttu «i t»^ 0 d? tl** ... j** 8 Xoo« bad a&«of jMift** 1S0«1 ifoijlv* TO •\il III «]^oi«oo-iiodt t«0il4 tol aid al TofQo«l0 Aavod ii« aplJuttXttT to aaewoq Jaao*i> %ad adv •i -ba04^ aa boTiir^OA 04 d oa dol'dir )o /baji «l»lo itois ^edl •« a#©0 sairaxl to ^X»to« Soa , utoaatfolofaoo »dl «l *1 .aolloosioa ino '! V ' |i -T4d to TO aood tv«d ?4sla dold^) aolvlao ai Jaoialtooe •j 1 ^ ii ’ ■ ^ * ioo» **» aatdyi) dqxialts aaolalqo XaoUiXoq »id »b« at barii ^ai'^ ( pdt} x^imaa bam aoitoutiaaooalm bevUtoo ^aitbd to aotrt xq ,(dotxi .(aid oJ^tMah. ^cltf I eooTqaoal el eetaeao^euoieaeB to XXIw I>09gi''t4l‘ 1 k 3dd> ttl tolled tddt baanaiooai ot Betd aid aabb -wocijad toV^oo «x;^9i;deo laaaariaa to laeaateoelb t adi ^ ,toyaataa *1 . deoaXutiotdo lMt^ ..l)d4 . obtse3 eaooTl 0 baa oddBalin tot ' ao 1 loi ebl eaoo t-Cttilfottf ‘•tadl tdo^no itoldv • eofit aantrd alotlw adt lo-xbitaab tCQQed adf ao ^0# to amixioatnq T^aitamiaM iao» baa t aaldJ laod adt %£ao toa mJtd ot ** 1 1 bta 0 tstti alfi 03 e^enoxi atto l^ltai aait x^dO* ^t^t ta^fOOtt i % • IM. '•' e' v'r f irJ .»v ' ">' ■. 4.^ /A™ V .i|« ‘ I K . ‘t 4ln>Z»& , 4 ^ ' f '-p ':( 3 " m . *^'4 V ^ t MM I#; 35 IV HOME AND FIRESIDE Cold mornings. Days by the fire. The Realities of the unreal. Little child, ren. "Oh, wilderness were paradise e- now." "Baser of all woes." The essays that might be grouped under "Home and Fireside," are of a kind about which little can be said critically. The temp4 tation is to quote them entire: their quality is like the charm of upland pastures, nestling valleys, streams in flowered woods, oder4 on April and October days, music on Mad-day festivals, motly mem- ories of years that are gone. Brief, most of them; musings worked out in words. Behind them there is no urgent interpretation of life beyond the admonition to love^ and be kind.^ Hunt broods over a dainty bit of fancy or feeling till he overflows with af- fection for it. He dandles a pleasing image on his knee as though it were a child, pats it lovingly on the back, and addresses it in all manner of dainty phrases. Read, for example, his chatty gossip in the essay entitled "Getting up on Cold Mornings." De- lightful, all of it, in spite of the shiver we involuntarily ex- perience as we read. How very easy it is for Mr, Hunt to excuse himself, and thereby also the reader, for lying in bed of a cold 1. "The Eleven Commandments." in A Jar of Honey, p. 22. 2. "Cruelty to Children." in "The Companion," May 7, 1828. 3. "Indicator," January 19, 1820. t ' B& I’w - ' 4 I Ki* i-1* .* It A- i . «Sk t t» 4 •■“ -’tJ ^ ■'* T I S^pi', (i ^ ' - n .a' '■ ' 'ii iu-ir.> -f*' V**f xaiQtHXY an f.uoB I r,-. •'‘^ A**"**' «X*»3 , .fisaiirtom tXoO *,fc '• -" i ■f ,. ■’’j; . A>- --- - V— »• 1.WUI V«\IU •Sil 4.ti9 'mUi la »l»9%aufi4AJ lx> -♦ ••xpm ♦ ‘ . ^ '£X* ^0 i0««8<* **.woa u# Ki “V ' . ^.1 <1 • r»«s ^ 4 feO^^ocioE*' l*fcoa 0 tf 9 aEJ ■t «««0 0 iil ‘^T' .taUclJlto »0 n«o •UnX laion » to iiA a 1« .« vol #41 1 •! xJlx# 0 p ilftfi jfetlJav m»rfl oXo»p q 4 ' pi L, -foa ^f#oa *«I«fi).oot ao s-X fctfa. trOonef .boljiX otf Xraa uti ool-ij iAQuttf# otlX >"'f, llSt\t 0»0t»>»T* .•!{ • fXU S«U»(>t to iC 8 f«i» to }1«( •■'v»Ol»i ... ._ . . f' ." ,. ■'ip CAflOdi •«..sO«OJt ttiA oo 03|A«i BSXoilviq s .tl. Jj 4 %‘ ii 6 ff* .,?fpA 0 wlf'aorttXinXTol ,UUo a oto*^»l 3 ’ .T j , ■• f* aaaatAq ^|Ai«i> to-f»d««a» lla nt V ■ . , *1 f\ '■ ^ ^ • B 'jP* t] \XXaAo aid oOXqiRAxr not •baoE r 6 ■ > r — ! ’•.aBctXBnoH^bXQO oo q« »aX4»oX)« boiJl’tfa# ^aaat^srt# ol qtaaoa ' - , •, K' , ' ' ., -Jto lXXn«4A«X#>roX o« norlAt odi to f^iqa al .#t to XXa , , aaocr** 04 i'BuB -.nH not al jj ^nov <»oh ,»A«lt4fr a# iooaoinq^ d !'•■ bXoo a to bod fli <**o1 ♦ fOl»«on' odt^o ttXa V<^onojt(4 Od# #-txaa«Xil -ffl ® ... ■»■ . . , ^ q ,fOfli>ti to. t«l 1 ci, "„• o4.«<»ntba*m«p<>,, aovoXa »l-< w ^ • iro 1 Aaqmr a •4,T'»* a i > ■ '■"’r /?■ - 05 i«X , ex U««i blit -'•• « **««»'i*XiO(/i»-ojr i[4|ojaT(3r« ' -if _'i at .e i!iX3P34t:aa; k'tfi. n '-"i< «iXt 36 morning when he allows (invites) himself to Indulge the fancy that Adam was not under the necessity of shaving, and that Eve did not have to walk out of her delicious bower upon three inches of ice. Quite wittily he puts before the reader the luxuries im- agined, and the sophistries indulged by an ingenious lier in bed. The wise ones, who counsel that getting up of a cold morn- ing is merely a matter of will, do not stand high in Mr. Hunt*s regard. Those who say that a person, who has been warm all night, and finds his system in a state of perfe^ct harmony with the tem- perature of his bed, need only take a resolution to rise, and the thing is done, are simply mistaken. When Mr. Hunt, lying in bed, is suddenly made conscious of the weather by touching stone-cold sheets, by seeing his breath roll forth like smoke out of a lone cottage chimney, by noticing the frozen windows, and to cap it all, by hearing the servant announce as he comes in, "It is very cold this morning, is it notT" he is deaf to all resolutions to rise, and to all little philosophers busy with the affairs of other people. How very exactly he pictures for us the humorous situa- tion of the lier in bed asking questions of his servant concern^ ing the temperature of the atmosphere outside the inside of the bed. With what wit he makes the servant contrive his questions so that his answers must fall in with the wishes of the lier in bed. One excuse for not rising after another is hunted up and indulged. But finally comes the conviction that he must rise. Water for shaving is called for. Another respite while the servant is gone for the hot water, during which time it is, of course, "no use" to get up. One or two more interruptions, and delicious f ', ' ' ^HT •>'"Twv^H 'J^^M ■ ■"^‘ I xaaMl eH a^lttbni otf JX«»ib4x 1 ( X ml |\ two Ila »c( aoiiV Bsiowoffl ovS ^od^^baM ,8fllv«iia !to '^JXaatoaa tii^ v«£ra« 9oa •«« catl laif^ k7«" a itoiionl tondrf aoqu meitoo too 1 ol Xofi »«iil lo »»o" JtXaw 0 ^ trarf joa All)' >ni iKWinazaX o<(i *3«Aat*i oil# ^o-so^wd «lo^ tii ^11 IX iop .toi %o .votf at tell aMC^e:^al as x^ be^labal ttliltldqoa #dX bas^.healbs e» ^ -avov ttoo a “lo q«f saXldwi ?ai{d ieeaai^o .odw'^ fseao eslw edt *1 * * • 7 e'jTflwK •’xjl al ajjld basS e ^foa ob $Iltw lo tpS^sti s ^Xoioa tl ||cii ’* t^dala £i» vurme aee6 esd ' osie ^aoetex » iad$ \S9 ode ewedf I • ^ * ?v -ttol eti3 tU le taocriad lo^e^neq lo eisie s al -itoltxa •111 «Anlt bas ffi » ' — ''“ ' '■ has ,ealt ol aeUalotoi « A»»». lAttf *14 >0 ,Ag«t al t^axiH ,ntt aedV « 4 ]*ili.}aiia »T® \ estob al »l AXoo>Wi 30 ^a ^altfoaol x^ ^ladlaaa -ul^j lO auoloaaoo ebsm xi^db^oa al^ oiial d >0 iwo sdoaa ^edU dlwot tCaa d^^af^ad alxi ^aieaa x«< ♦al##ila ,Il4> 11 qac‘>l Aaa «dvoAaiw aeaot'tredi ^atolsoa X<* #x®**l^lo e^diSOo \ Moo x^ter al dl** ,al aemoo ea as enauooMs laavaoa «rtl baiteed \ta adl dile xsad atai^uftolllq •XlllX XX* -atfSia aaotcffad axil ao tol t«iaioiq « 37 five minutes almost spoiled by thinking upon the '*v i 1 lainous '* cus- tom of shaving. '‘Ho wonder," he thinks, " that the Queen of Franco took part with the rebels against that degenerate King, her husb- and, who first affronted her smooth visage with a face like her k own* And thereupon we are asked to review a whole army of ben^isk- ered faces; Emperors, cardinals, artists, authors, poets, kings, philosophers, Persian gentlemen and Turks, all are brought in to prove that shaving is a modern invention of the devil’s recruit- ing officer. "The mechanical man shall get up without any ado at all; and so shall the barometer."^ 2 How very different the mood in "A Day by the Fire," Light- hearted still, but therewith an underlying tone of seriousness, he talks quietly of indoor enjoyments. As the hours of the day slip from sunrise to darkness, bringing with them the changing cares, so the tone of the essay changes, from light-hearted com- ment to reflection, as becomes the "Reflector." This day by the fire must begin early: "The morning is clear and cold; time is half past seven; scene is a breakfast room." There must be, in addition to this, if it so please the reader, a little hoar frost on the window, a bird or two coming after the crumbs, and the light smoke from the early chimneys. There must be a fire in the break- fast room to which he can apply the p oker---whe ther needed or not; and when the hundred little sparkles fly from the coal dust that falls within the bars of the grate, and the flames themselves mount aloft with a deep and fitful sound as of a shaken carpet;" 1. One must read the entire essay to get its flavor . "Indicat or" for January 19, 1820. pp. 117-20. 2. "The Reflector." Vol. II, Art. XX. pp. 400-419. ‘i:. . v.itj j X<< ioJi/nlffl •rn • 0Cl^>^ TO Hi '. ds JAtli ” , •i«t>aov.' c:t" .gtflsraiia 'it. moJ , ,u* ' c. ; A7 »acs«i' -jL'r’t 3tui«S£ aXe&oi ccJ Jt4voiq lit C^bi? JuuHMVf .|J ii*ila {XBta X*ol a**ri y*flt . * ^ . ii»l9c:6^«l otiJ ItsM^ Ob bnji iXXil -lapIJ 9JlJ yd yea A” / boor ot^l laote't’JJb yry v woD , . ij *uoJ 'eiaXyl'tolr; a« rjiareyods «fXiia belneejil -ij to eiirofl ■iuj «x . ttitnayo {.xrii -loobui. ic. i^Xel oxi > r Rn t c»ni aslbi jHij^ai-Tii , t qj ■iainacre riT qXXt *.r,0D b 01100:" -Ih? i X cotT rriaj ©d l lij /-iioJ :.dJ Oi , ■■nuo \c ^.ei> a/»:;• cr' » 0 «oo»MiJ ;Xian hn* ... ->.‘n*oD • rt? »• .-.‘ij:.© ai:;iv''' .'•..i.M utH rl ;yur itod? *’,nno-i la£'tajA«'r'x Oi,. lOtrXq o;> li :l ^axnJ oi rtoxlibbe .yjr-'"' * .'j i ^ oa« .«<«0i© a:il loiltii nwt no mJc e ,w.bflX» #<11 00 •i^'l y 1 u <»ei oi tiil fi - ': laor aie-OT .ayoitetlao y t:?u in.! . o -iT -»;(o«o J >. . ti; 1 dJi : ,*i-.i6aoq odJ «« 0 vd -us;n 1 aet .. ,‘ ’fc.-;; Xaoo ui'< 1 -9011 y/t aoX^ieqa aXlJil hx:^ atxiw bae kfvX.-smodi BOBeXX anJ bojb •#! ..* aiao adi tilrtlxy .IXet ^;:r<,n*o .Tojlacd <; 'to »e /,a«o« It.’JiiX baa a##b s elli'* iXoi.^ laooiB / '••(oijapi i. 4l ” , -ipTflf t alX lj»s o; ya ». 4u a** 1 aril fte'S'f i*u*u -jaO .X .Oi.*-7Xi .O'; .oii'.'A .'fix yici/oa't. xo7 _ .tl.'-OOJf ,,j.y .aA . : ‘ia ,il ,XuV ” . to Iti# 1 "TaJl OiSl’*' .a, |g^iW^B»W^»=-.rrr,==5r;a ~.-.^. | iTr"r' i . .' Fxarjrwwi . .-■ 38 Here epithets fail him so he has recourse to poetry; Then shine the bars, the cakes in smoke aspire, A sudden glory bursts from all the fire. The conscious wight, rejoicing in the heat. Rubs the blithe knees, and toasts th* alternate feet.* Evidently, Mr. Hunt has not yet become serious. The cares of the worry -inf es te d day have not found lodgement in the b4*e mind that can imagine the humor of the sitter before the fire, toasting one foot, then the other foot, then both at once, then neither while he is trying to shield his face from the heat, and wondering how a back can be so cold, and a front can be so warm, when both front and back, and feet and face, belong to the same toaster. If the t picture here presented gives us pleasure, we suppose it is in de- spite of the poetry. Mr. Hunt will not allow us to forget that he has just been apprised of the fact that life is a matter of contrasts, and that sometime he may want to be a phlogistic advo- cate of a lier in bed of a cold morning. So cold plays its part in the scene before us. How tantal i singly , and with what infi- nite and exact details, he describes the breakfast and the morn- ing firei Here is a bit of it in his own words; • ••**if you eat plain bread and butter with your tea, it is fit that your moderation should be rewarded with a good blaze; and if you indulge in hot rolls or toast, you will hardly keep them to their warmth without it, particularly *In a footnote Mr, Hunt says that the lines are a '♦Parody upon a part of the well-known description of night, with which Mr, Pope has swelled out the passage in Homer, and the faults of which are known and have long been appreciated by general readers •'* Query: Is he satirizing Pope? <■ } c.r.'iuoool rii ,o« iil.JiAl «;5r;::q« •Its V fflcnt c'l bttJljuo aiJ fated vdj eoL'''-i * ^ f f ui I {Je sdo^i 'ei ttu6 .iLKn. -r i 3l -::r; I< eocLo^ua-j etr ^'W *■ *»w Lum .ee^uM od^ilcf »a^ eduH ^ -• > - ^cci. t>fC ,r«v JOii er^. J^H .tV ' Ij/ ■" ■^. 1 > ’ .. i . mM et.j cl : ; oruiifco f ibaodT #©fl oVmt^ fes r x***»‘' * ; ' ’• i1UMQ9 r^iir r,nol#o teJ9te ‘itiJ \<) *JCfl»Oll odj 0'.iiS*enjt ilJic. vi • S«*i * ,i.f>oo ia iiJoa ,Jto\ tpiS3o eti 9 n«»ii;r ' , 906 1 .. -jjaitlpAflCV l>fir. ,J.\f»;i t*.'; r^iit •0A'» 87A bteiAn A i il «xS .JiTon^ r^w'ti iIOi^^» .&:•»£*# c a od ami' .tftO't'i ^J5na v a oc nivo a(oad *. • - •• ■: rfcu’ oiSAt £»a J O^t ?ji.orac , friia'i i'f;a teift oae f9i(y§di fraa .. • ' . '■ I H 0 Ai f i ri r^eoqcBi «>. , mw fca&Xt-i •« r»vl.v , 1*31 leta‘.a^ vJ ».u W 0 XJ 4 10 :i xr.!’-; .*>■’< .V.-slBOq *r l ^0 BlXqt . ' ■ . IL'i ^ ' » v TC>li4:r M 4i elil i i 3oe\ » I o '6« i . »'q* Bfeo leoj, e&d #rt ol ‘-I^cfilq -If 'j Jrt*w %ea »ri •^i<4}t«0i. J*ul ijr..^; ,ttJi*ilijoo *^r II X* I , Dfoo '" ■? .^’.1 fmqm iMeo a lo tow nl idil <• to b1*c -Ilai r .iV. .(llw tea . ^ *^OH .4*.' tttotow C.iitto* difJ ri ) ' . . » -niom i|rlJ t qi; X e*Y'!c) 1 1 r. aoj^ .u.n ,oiiul«-D lorxa Jbo* •liu rabxo'v ii%o >IA ai fl to ilo t* 9 1 Biat? X0iX't RflX li fnei ton% Ail% T«iJt»r. J>tj* li*«)*td bIjbXq J«€ «o» li"'... i ■' : / i ^1I» l^'^biBWox 00 X>ioo3« flollaxoJaOai nuo\ lir ’ li i ol ■ !i iJIv tio\ fiteol 10 illzt Ju3 ni •-ginbaX uo% ti i>ae. iftaeld | Xl'i^Xual n*r. ,1X Itr rillw d^arrw ol ciodl q«*^^/tr. *1* ;V t*QC: 1 a i tX 4 *« *3 1 miii/p raKtr"-; 39 if you read; and then, --if you take in a newspaper,-- what « a delightful change from the wet, raw, dabbing fold of paper, when you first touch it, to the dry, crackling, crisp super- ficies, which, with a skilful spat of the finger nails at its upper end, stands at once in your hand, and looks as if it had said, "Come on and read me," Nor is it the look of the newspaper only which the fire must render c omple t e : -- i t is the interest of the ladies who may happen to form part of your family, -- of your wife in particular, if you have one, to avoid the niggling and pinching aspect of cold; it takes away the harmony of her features and the graces of her behav- iour; while on the other hand there is scarcely a more in- teresting sight in the world than that of a neat, delicate, goodhumored female, presiding at your breakfast table, with hands tapering out of her long sleeves, eyes with a touch o of Sir Peter Lely in them, and a face set in a little oval frame of muslin tied under the chin, and retaining a certain tinge of the pillow without its cloudiness," A very comfortable place to remain, this place at the break- fast table; but Mr, Hunt must give us a bit of the dinner time. And that the Joy of the breakfast may not be without its "fly in the ointment" he humorizes about the three evils of a fire at dinner. Persons who must sit with their backs to the fire are "liable to oe scorched, while at the same time they render the persons opposite them liable to be frozen, so that the fire be- comes uncomfortable to the former, and tantalizing to the latter." For all this he has a remedy. It is so obvious a remedy too. io bM battik .vail. >•«•/(« aoit* ajuwio, lotJitjlUfc • • ,.J,o ,xib .it« ./ .ti kbupt »•«* L-> J* aiiaa ,»snl« loUl<. , a,i, U »a ajceai ^a, »i ,ob» ,, ,6a, ,,4 ’■*" *Sia« aa«.4 "C ^ .^Oi 8in» ei io« «*.•« Jt>n« flq • \ ic - . w »i — i»ieI,B06 iw,n»T bn «m pits iotbt tlno>*,«o’«»»a itfj JO JLi-atoJ *» oB» ..Ual •4»„Vo. >..„<»j »tf j ,,i .oco 5y»ij 4)^^ u .jaluojia,, sJ tilp joe^ :. v>sx ** ' ■ V Jfr loTta; J1 ,6Joc JO ^o.(,,« salOoel, oa^ ,a, ojqv* o» -vaaao •en j, ooos's* ado M, •»Tu>a»> a»ii ji vaonjaid §40 t«»a I I -ul pxcr a ti.o-jaoa »1 ^aiad< baad Jadlo »At no •ttim ’)»»«* .»J»oUo6 ,t»*a a 10 #a4J oajlo tltoo aoj ai J/t»ia wDntft ^ fn f i ;.■- I I oji« .tXdaj OaatKaa'jd'iuoa j, ■*oi»^a»•t 9 .alaaaj t>*ioa«(at«oi9 c rfoooj • «iJi* »ata .pnotoi»\aol ton So" i no ialxpptf * ' ’ - ' " * i'’ jS? " ‘ Iiro #uiu « ai lt« iio«\ 0 , tnj .morfj bJL tit lo • a . . ■ ■ W' ,r . ^ ■ 6tMtfo g foi«UJe.t »fi» .aicft i»#l/ ilft ¥ ‘r: 'V'&i; iwB «oat3t • n Aj y o*ti 0^ j fljoa ftai- .i. saJiflj , Joa . .1 3 Tjft . d V '' I) \f i> Cifi... . Oil J c -OT ] '1 pr ''.iVOJ i»^iqcr©OC£iw ■■ if t ".■af'.r. '^n;' ,■>&.< oj LooaXq «*c: itii^ t r .tl. ••u. .©'ill ‘ "* I s K 3 \:' } ’ . .at Mcow J!lfli llo t'Clt lav woT. .h^ \ • ' .. ^ ;c ’ . -. ^ai ni min ota o Uhm ,zi*fiado Mtrti •■: f-j XL .;>'or ^rtvfilv^ alii al ow i (:<• ■ '.'■ . - l*r om , ?l ill sa?c t>ui:iX c-a .'vriJ *fvlXiiot * ** ^ '. • ’^ y f O'; flX iit ojlap ©ir.^toa •"i;»ao*T' : ipamt *lr r.i ,!i:( .i^r^ fr ‘oi' 'cXXsa# woH .' ».ii . .crLlii t© «*:(..'•* 5i2;- ::.' » jictuxrt iilAco 3«XftoI^ mds ^ ‘ -i ijjoa jr.i, n , isr^ i v; ,«lXa;i ,i^©X .i©i £t t .lri..(w mult . t->©T(4 .. • ', ‘to 1C imilijqm tiiJ nztsc ' . ^rii; . ..lao^^ c^o aln; 3 ^c ' nu j«>x C t ,nclq .jf.ur . .■ .©-rtlij'to i>na ni»o»kj*4 §tapd ptii <’ j brm " »mm^ 7 op •J’ > .■.■ luptit v.jlv*:c% .t.9i trf^ 43X» *uiXXXa»t #*fi>%xtw dioilt -V^ ■ "V »iif *‘,o^r»o»iT « 4 iM(r*' oi jci;^X »5 ta cBY«/to td? Ullw *^,joi 40 **, 3(000 4 ^.oio](C.** oil# ftl yaivilr^to ^uojT 2 >a».oi>tao*xX 3 i i a 1 :V* aJ f oilotiXt t-o 4 !^ ^ ♦ ^ 3 uoid^ ioa , aoi Jaaijlftml X<* o,fr sxa^sd i ^ ;« 0 A|«^ tea bjrti at rai^iXaa ojaaaia iXio« l^ioat oiitf to oo^toJa ^ 7^1 “• s: -.a*l tXol id^Lablm *xloi^i T*lq Xxna aaaab lo.lnlat adX lai • V. ' ' .V tit* Offoo aoboda toilaX ol^ilX •#qo0 tat ,eaitoi8B« iXo, ,aolo **> , hi , , i,i ‘. ^ S'-* 4%in tlo* tea aam/iltep eg nla%a aril «v aoo«liaotaU 04J 0« iallan#i^et*, 4 ’ ^al jaad-J t6 XXa ,aaloeat •!» ,^tat seltai ttaoXoad asSt -, '■' ' "tf IV jea , aai-alxeitaa to»®ioXo ni^ala 0 J oXol aeodatqaoo ' • I " ® * taeiosolXa }Ofi aoiallaal) tXMi to ♦iptaoa «1 tuflj^eat tlao* aiU ot ' ,g ■ . • . ' ,. aia Jiathfceeototq ad/ to t0 loa taja a*tttui .aaoXote . . tr -iXtaft ,#B«q»a0 pat jaMtov to xattanb oex ptatual tea qtatB Jua };roafliiXq altt f0 babajoa O'd ia'fo^tXxa to ampltotq tap ' ■ •' ■" ' • j . 7 \ ^ £.-VS^S^ -bea7«te^eo odl bna , a«e«(}aOetao ad^.hliv^ aAao.qa oA taiiX X»»t o« ^ ■' ‘ » ' V '. ■ I V'’- «a tle:^Xob iloil# avail ataox** Xadi baataoX bAw aao to %al o-J ’ilqatBataq e to ^laq o^ourji oil ^•*.taXdaaaX aa XXae .. ,. . • • >* • a;,,, m ' ' ■■ \^t- X»pa a.a lapta bea ,ool ua tq»o00 ilia .,, oaloaeY* . . ., "^ ' ■'*■* "■ '' ’■* -.v ■ / votb xo ae Hat aaoHooiXooot tadlo aoilt ,atfXaat 0 O MOat • t . 7 ‘< ii. #: r . ... 1 , 4 ,. fibafit r taHao to ,*aX*tX»a ^»eeot ata abaoXtt aadir-*, ielalaq ' ih • " . ’■ i ;:^5 ^ tt al bfiiAtad aati bXiov pdt Jtpda to VolOtaaiaaoe aao ' »f :i '!(r ’ •^C .q.5*' .alOxKi iaR’oM «oit xoeofl_to tat; i**?',X • ■'* .. „ •* -i..Hl '* 11 T tx 42 to compare with what we have missed out of it. They may even lead us to higher and more solemnmeditation, till we work our way beyond the clinging atmosphere, heavy from this earthly sojourn, and look abroad upon the light that knows neither blemish nor bound, while our ears are greets ed at that egress by the harmony of the slna no I f* X<^>«ifop itvaaaoXii .attaooi ■'•S ,' tf: ■'., %■ tittgqgqx^ ,tti\piipA x^Xaiotiia ojCaw oi •xai*Xa iao^ia^ otH. J »*f! aolA 9 l {»0 igdi fiaq foao PAi tag ^xi’ig'foq ai aocXoit ,«a#a ... f , If ... o n ■'* » i - '■ '' ^ X^g'f g't «A igdt 00 tt ow mtd tgg-% •« 00 i( .pcapoas bag , di Z ggA at > . -■- — ar -’Tf- .J: t.A ‘ .«X* *ftX4 <11 ,^ 7 «f 0 iX|^»* >Xv -Of Cfoo\07^ «/lf to oBiaad gdi aoj. afitasuaK 7 o4#iu1Sl^ .& ,(f *X *,ia#8 •j£T*’ oi 0tfflt7^oH »*.Xaf47jtroi ao0iS0«X •’faoS 1' " ^ rr,":W5 s i ^fel 8 te . y Li« 43 gay, very vivacious, very Jaunty, and sometimes, more than a lit- tle flippant and coxcombical; but he is never a "frothy frivo- list" as critics less kind and wise, and far more flippant than Hunt, have mischaracter ized him. If it were possible to qualify him by a single phrase (but it is not), that phrase might be, we think, "Earnestness at ease." In proof of this, and also as an example of "earnestness at ease", hear him at the age of fifty, in the "Address" of the first number of "Leigh Hunt’s London Journal • ..."We have been at this work now, off and on, man and boy (for we began essay writing while in our teens) for upwards of thirty years; and excepting that we would fain have done far more, and that experience and suffer- ing have long ago restored to us the natural kindliness of boyhood, and put an end to a belief in the right or utility of severer ways and views of any thing or person, we feel the same as we have done throughout; and we have the same hope, the same love, the same faith in the beauty and goodness of nature and all her prospects, in space and in time; we could almost add, if a sprinkle of white hairs in our black would allow us, the same youth; for whatever may be thought of a consciousness to that effect, the feeling is so real, and trouble of no ordinary kind has so remarkably spared the elasticity of our spirits, that we often startled to think how old we have become, 1. Reprinted in the Seer, vol. I, p. 9. The same "Address" is also reprinted in R. B, Johnson’s "The Poems of Leigh Hunt," pages ElO-219. ■= LJJUt ^ „j;. ; . * j « Bunj •i-.l i J r TO 4. i.>iXJ >;i i V' , t :i ' i ; V f t y ^1'/ » -cvi'it ^ -f.'.. , *. J a*a -tael : i, j i Xt' ef; af.r- I >" ■ ’.ni ■; 'ijiiji ut i. j i,i o . />4 •’JtsI!! 'i - •• J»* 0 : W - C i , ’ . .’ I , i I , «n f a i'ftJl i 1M| ? ^i.lAX. m:: Jja Wrf{; , Jat-H C ' . 0 j .. ; .* 3-.-. . J » t Joa «i H J VC ) Wi'.TC ! . . i. 'i Si 7C Blin :: •'. ty. C d ' £ , 6 . J Hu .; . 0 E i. ; J4 cf.c- . I .stai'-'d , V^tiT .3 'i f • , " O ^ COitJ »CJi7i4‘4 iQ •X^l&dc • * j i> » • Ic t»dr.x;a Jaiij **'« . t*-iubA« yaJ ax !,■.•. ^ SC |uj£ ^'iv ,«rOa :*‘iCv ie X:v&a t>-y 4 Uf •$* 5 *' , . . Tol > iflor.'ij *fjte txl vXi*W liji-iw n . t ) ^on L.IarfT A f ’ •.. ^ Jr c'oxo wa# ;fcT;av'x; . n.’iiS ;mh. 1 i''. y. ,r*1Uu 1 papO t*rj$(i atjll i . >,i i 1 :, .. i i mA} zu oj b;< t" c*’ :■ avsiX yai ofi/ a! 'll. l '»d j oJ toae . .'4<4 ,‘;ocl7.( II />n>r .yjac i-jiTO’tat ., ev • ■" r>?'M .*s «>r. J e>\i ■ X’W.t <.;15 . It i rjl©l e*04' ui. ' , » >' c I U'3.., ft , 7 . f ©?3.o’jl 1 » .1 0 *riJ WOaq >7 f. , « 3 0 fr • .1 1 q T t ' . T C # 1 'i E 7 :>nl>o a^'i> Ji>rt4 . , 0 J A r • i i > ( In i. 1q ir. 1 A , ‘i ' ;’ .< c O t» l C b ivc^ r V. '- • . v> 1. 1 ba» ■ X i .•(.i •■n.t ,«L v.oiJ[4 X- Loow i(c jj i •' 'uz. 4X ' ■’••xiaii '* • ' j o ii « 1 M.) 1 .'> a 's 0 »■' JR lO &i9 4 *- .Axit* So T 'r- f. -r'.'C on 7o tfdvtiJ .ai> c *. 4;i i a.U s rv.v ^v. ! ol J t# C« 'ftO'/ u ■:> nt • \ a X X off" ^ ‘>8 tan .• ovjsii ,%■ 1 0 wort .aiiJ? p: cafiJ - ■> '1 • ■- ■ _ ' 1 * tff> al 10 a^iv s tv*iofcA«l 9 A) tM 9 q§ 6 X©©ir« fv lalin •00I} -ItTO 01O« I0 ©no aootf Joa Oka too tl ■ '■ » ► i) ** .Xklil \i; 0 n ‘- loft ei Yoatt luBToOnx© ©i ©Tois /30i1,*#Tjnj ol l(ks Aoil R.' - ©I •/> r 1 / 0 © VX^Ok^iao© 010 »W *lai/tr r»dt iaonutat XaXnot -ao««©o i0lTli/ loom oa^ ,t*tltoq clllw Joo^ai ot % 9 lLl 4 m<^ tdt ■^1 1/00 ,aXooi od doXao kilt ^illrtURnoo oiaoileO odi al i kooaXq Oao Jlilqo aoaoi odl . kaAj«n©Ou// oO 00X0 te'xoooot old oodoooi ' V . o -» loaitoa «00 «d ,aoiiolqm0iaoo ilk 10 9 o 9 tdc \no90 to t^kooo^ ' ^ '* ■ '■'' ‘ " 41 -pqatJitoo 10 anooioooOoiq aiil qo ^* 4 o»on.iqo ao¥o ,**ofl OoXokp ,, *■ • i ‘ " -xo Oao loot 01 Od Oocq ©ai to ’’a©la«ilpj« ©# 1 , JbeoOaX n .aoltot j • toT 0 jl kalqOjO# la©!? dsloJ Os© ^§©©0 odl- fco 03 # *.c1 Xactoi^ BoXJ^tOll© »©^|tfO !>©laloq A©d‘ ©ki , doldO'j ol , ;;; 45 Just now we happen upon the essay entitled ''Realities of the Imagination*" ^ In it he describes how the faculty that solaced 80 much that was troubled in his own daily life, enriches its hap- py possessor in the most literal sense, and creates for him imag- es and shapes of beauty. "There is nothing imaginary," he says, "in the common acceptation of the word." The logic of Moses in the "Vicar of Wakefield," seems good logic for Mr. Hunt. "What- ever is, is," says that worthy. And so Hunt. He insists that we can judge of things only by their effect. Imagination, Mr. Hunt thinks, "adds a precious seeing to the eye;" and if we read his essays with imagination they will add a precious understanding to the heart. In many of his essays we ^et a sense of the reality that dwells in things of the spirit. We are rescued from the bab- ble of common cares and enabled to hear all the affectionate voic- es of earth and heaven. We hear the brooks in the solitudes where they flow; and . . . "Gentle gales , Fanning their oderiferous wings, dispense Native perfumes; and whisper whence they stole 2 those balmy spoiles." Are these ministrations of nature only imaginary, and therefore non-existent, because, forsooth, we experience them only while we read? Mr. Hunt would say, "They are very real, more real than any material thing, because a material thing can be taken from you; but the possessions of the imagination are yours, and not title, (The motto referred to is; "A dram of sweet is worth a pound of sour." Spenser). 1. "Indicator." March E2, 1820. 2, Milton, "Paradise Lost," Book IV. r to ai»lilX4fa‘* h^UkJOif tt«ii#«, 9(<^ ntqqaii. •« «oa V • ■ *^ '* * tfc*r©a oaf n*A cedl^ontfc »J 4 ♦* -f>*4 til t«rioi*-at ,t\lj ano: tlA oi ttldwots l^mpdo^ia ot -a4«l Mill ttlAtno £>fl« VntneN Ito/D toattttoq xq ftttt tfl jainitxt iii .qiojBo© to 4©q«;901 •’.bltiii./jHI \0 ♦V 10^1. alti(fcol *1? ,3jiJ/Ti 0*1 boA *XA419« tyet "^tl a ■ ■ * f? '■ q : *tn titrfj X^f oaoiiil to fsbift ttto » .1 *;xC b«tb« Iliw xodl ooiiVaiattji dai^ «XJitA« '» t' *, xliXott ’ooi to otifta « ion ti» ex«««0 §14 to odt ^ ."■, , ,v '■ ' • 1. 4 M ' -dJit qriJ^fflont iooottt tt« of .Jj-tJqt a4l’ to taoidl aL %tU*b-3»tkl ^ 11 * • cXOT,. 40 Aaollpott 4 a 4 # 11 m toto Ol bolo^u# 004 ftotoo aot^ouM. to olo aioOw aoOoiiioc 041 ol %ioono o4i! iito«i «,a 4 ao rtiiMo to^V ' f T- * •■ ■'tv. JV .} hMA ^ ««e« aa*; »pd ,vaT .^' ' ',■' .t ‘ - ».■■■- • i V ™ ^ «..a^ "<4— *i«aa*l*<(l- a 4 #toor »x looiTk to or/ tb i**a;.ai al boi-sotoi oiJo*, 04tJ .oXlii ■ ‘ a ■( T|lo«aaq £5 ^.itfoa' to ’= 'V ■* »t 4ood ofiXbVtjaX* aiioOXXy' .i ^ D x! 46 transferable." Let him speak for his faith, "The poets are called creators, because their magical words bring forth to our eyes the abundant images and beauties of creation. They put them there, if the reader pleases; and so are literally creators. but whether put there or discovered, whether created or invented (for invention means nothing but finding out), there they are. If they touch us, they exist as much as anything that touches us. If a passage in King Lear brings a tear to our eyes, it is as real as the touch of a sor- rowful hand. If the flow of a song of Anacreon’s intoxicates us, it is as true to a pulse within us as the wine he drank. We hear not their sounds with ears, nor see their sight with eyes; but we hear and see both so truly, that we are moved with pleasure; and the advantage, nay, even the test of hear- ing, and seeing at any time, is not in the hearing and seeing, but in the ideas we realize, and the pleasures we derive. In- tellectual objects, therefore, in as much as they come home to us, are as true a part of the population of nature, as visi- ble ones; and they are infinitely more abundant. Between the tree of a country clown, and the tree of a Milton or a Spenser, what a difference in point of productiveness! Between the plodding of a sexton through a church yard, and the walk of a Gray, what a difference! What a difference between the Ber- mudas of a ship- bui Ider , and the Bermoothes of Shakespeare: the isle ... Full of noises Sounds, and sweet airs that give delight, and hurt not; the isle of elves and fairies, that chased the tides to and r.cr ■■■ 1 ~ l, WT a - . r ,^.. ■'. ~ ■ --y,-; W 7)^ .U ii;J .J*;! TC» x*&q« criri * . d f C :‘ I Ol J •i)':o f X«t>J>4ac: •■ .^-'.ojao'to oaClMo st/s o^cioq i;j r I *lv ,o:jvr..;w, . J.-,;; ^*y,; . ■ , .rf j ati\,«* *’‘-«0 OS t.3'l'y\ Jj.ui-Jd on-ca*. i ...a'^rc ,a^tTB 9 ^o , i; J f;.. *;«»iiidiiv Jiuo .•loiao'jt/ v,J[£#t#flI «i« I JiTC y.iiffjt.i 4iUi#r ':ri) bola.^vai -i© l>(»4«aio •« -‘oia*/ VT. , r;;/ itbo* */»*d3 1. .-^na ,"*'^i}r ' -.a i bull;* ■” ■■'•'’ »«•»•«*•i/ot^i'l om al ii , jUj.k *tbc oJ 1«&1 a. d%ait()' • e^Jj'liLuSiil a ‘IJ . ^,y -irij- >, )*a,; ,. -^o wolX^t>aj -i ■, L^sji Xw^moi .fr' ••.Tfv ortj »i3 3. i3'-:i.'Ivj httTutj x ct 9->'\3i ■« $i :i t’Ji\ v(i« nr>:r .ai^o afcctroa -xlaxii Jca *W- • b*iO.T '.'1. I V. 1 .,; -If (; •, / Joc ,., J, tvcj tjjot. ow ; ec\<* -114^.1 "Ji. ;«u; ,f i: ; ♦ «i'-ia-'U4 vl ;. j.i* tcA 5X1J oi j-it »i ,a.rij ia nfi.,1 •3* ov caaveAciq Ai. . i>j,. .tx^ '.inrirf «. u«i;i br 7 :j1 0^ /•me; -(>j!! 0 £> Ytdi «*t ; ear iii ,e:r- ,£jr .4 t: stux ^ (--i ty _ , «jy ' .. BAew.^oi . 73 baoca f.igtu 9i4 , T .• ii ,'!)■'<•■ - rt -. b tfo^Xiil o Ir oeij rci7 i>na ,awi?Io y^’iicuoo a Ic aotw* ■ .* ' i 3 - SttL . i j tjairoa.^ \o jwioij .■:- a <^A3« fl •?© .T4r noT.-r'a a /iMui . -:aj 3o^a«<» a lo ^^tlfcfcoXt? -'*ot or. J ao»v:^a^ cei>*-*)tXo M 3 nAW :9vn9%9ti i b a Ijit’ .ijaiO : 9a«^q aoHad e Yo aedlbC27'iv€ e i lud -ir- iAt • ^ *o •afctro ’ . :■ : u f eA4 . ) 6-:t.iun to ilu'i .,. ' *'.* . *• *«i ;*wu jTwri bcA ,3A^ii9b ovii' Jaiij «*ii« Joawo boa .abqo'Ciiil . „ >«5 l (\M OJ OXtw* I-qtaAriO , « 0 1 1 i tf 1 bOiJ lO 0 a r, I 47 fro on the sea shore; ... Such are the discoveries which the poets make for us; --worlds, to which that of Columbus was but a handful of brute matter.'* We have quoted thus at length, because one great injustice, among many others we do to Mr, Hunt’s essays by merely describing them, arises from the hopelessness of conveying in the least de- gree any idea of the earnestness, the ease, the graces of style and manner, the natural, spontaneous impulse with which every i- dea is touched. We could as easily describe Jenny Lind's sing- ing by saying, that she sang "Annie Laurie." In this, as in so many of his essays, we have the outpourings of a heart beating in sympathy with all suffering, all joy, all aspirations, -- the spon- taneous reflections of a mind rich in literary knowledge, overflow- ing with fancy. But nothing short of actual perusal can give an adequate idea of the style and manner of the essay. We should like to quote entire the next little essay^ that falls under our notice. It is just such delicate wisdom as this essay holds that chastens the joys and sorrows with a touch of quiet, unpretending pathos. It is not at all surprising that this grave and tender essay was the favorite of Charles Lamb. We feel a little disposed to ponder and fabricate what |^. Lamb, whose sor- row was like no other sorrow in the annals of literature, may have thought upon reading the statement in this essay that "the true way is, to let them grapple with the unavoidable sorrow, and try to win it into gentleness by a reasonable yielding," We would not 1, "Deaths of Little Children." The Indicator, April 5, 1820. iTtSS vk I,.;. w.v otit siottiw «»ln«»oa*U^eii» •tn K^wa ... ft»T:pif« m§h od^ a* 4 ^d vv •• , .J., * ':lt: ,»ol3Ai/ltti f0^’x% r«o »Ba«p«d ,iU 8 ii»X •i.'rf# Jb## 0 P^ OTad pw ^aidlnoopb \,d a*^auH •ijt oi oii ow aiad^o xq^aib 8 ^ 0 ^ -al> 3«*aX ai^j al ^Ai^araoo lo aaaaaatXaqod 'iia.i-aoil »iiaidd-^ii#jej aaoatji 9 tH .9940 dd^ . ataad atoiaa ad^ io atl>i -1 itc-irit» d^ii* aalaqaii acoana^aOQH t^atxrsaa adJ ^laoadin tda -Brtl » *t^l)oiJ ^aaat, aOX-toaea xSl 9 M» *ji bltroo tV .dadodo si 4 oj& ^ .^ ;•■ / . , ■'■ ■'■ oa oi aa . altfif ai ’’•aitoa.i aiaaaoqalJt» aXxilX a evad tia« tanoJataxlX to aiaaca adj' al wottoa lodlo on atfil aaw wot * IR awtx adi*' ladx xaaaa aXdi al: xoanaxala odi sdlbaat aifqa Ids^odl . ' ‘ -r *■ ', ' ttl bua «wottoa wXdablovaaa adl dllw aXqqat» piadl lai ol ,ai ^aw «■ (i low bXa'Ow aW'* ".anlbloi^ aXdaaoaaai a tjO aad£H»Xlaas oxai ll aiw ol ,; .■ .iff*. '-' , _'•■« -a . Mw,4 ar' ■ y \ ■ , 0 S 8 I .d ^Il toA .tolaolfcaX adT .aanbi to adlayfltv i^x 48 $ uot e-*i have it understood that the sentence Just. from the essay was dear to Mr. Lamb because it gave him a new philosophy; it was dear to him because it strengthened and corroborated the resolution he had made more than twenty years before to “grapple with unavoidable sorrow.** Also it must have appealed to Lamb because it expresses sensitively the deep and abiding love he had for children, --real children, and “dream children.** May we not quote a part of a par- agraph for the sake of its heartfelt gravity. “We do not mean that everybody must lose one of his child- ren, in order to enjoy the rest; or that every individual loss afflicts us in the same proportion. We allude to the deaths of infants in general. These might be as few as we could rend- er them. But if none at all ever took place, we should re- gard every little child as a man or woman secured; and it will easily be conceived what a world of endearing cares and hopes this security would endanger. The very idea of infancy would lose its continuity with us. Girls and boys would be future men and women, not present children. They would have attain- ed their full growth in our imaginations, and might as well have been men and women at once. On the other hand, those who have lost an infant are never, as it were, without an in- fant child. They are the only persons who, in one sense, re- tain it always; and they furnish their neighbors with the same idea. The other children grow up to manhood and woman- hood, and suffer all the changes of mortality. This one alone is rendered an immortal child. Death has arrested it with its kindly harshness, and blessed it into an eternal image of youth and innocense.'* CO ea«r sKi tAi i«iU &oo;t dli «y«d f 9 ^ • ' i' ■'■ „te 0l iis«fc «BW it i%A(iot^fiX XAti W9a M^tald 99^^ Jl ««o«o«d dcuij li.'tV o;^ •’ ' f*' t*aA od itoU0io»»i «tf3 bviAnodontoo ta« 6»xr«d^ta»-si • ii ««a«o«d 'mid ^ - X ' ‘ ' •id*AXotacif iliJw «Xqq#«n5L dJ •tot»d \ia*wd xxMdt •io« iJ^atc — ■ »ftea#iqjt» ^2 a^a^ad dmaJ ei balaaqqa avAd }«tia q»Im **.«oi7os lAa*!"** , U9ibl Idt *<01 jbad ad atroX ^aibldA bus qAib adX qX#Tl2lacaa \ . •^- - «i*q A 10 XfAq a a^oap XOff aw **.flasbl2do mAa'^^l»’’ bas .aaifetlf^ ■> 4 ,_ , - * *1 .X2 1^0*18 tfXalXiAtd a/1 lo adaa ad/ lol itqetsA' V . '■i; • ’ - •>* >^Xido aid lo uao atul /aaii \bod>(‘ra^a 1 aj) 4 odaro Xoa ob a«* ^ aaoX iMvblvibal %i»t9 /ad/ lo jJaa^ ad/'tota» o/ labio al ♦dai ed/aab adi e/ abtfXXA'aV .ooX/^aqonq amoa^td/ al td a/oiXtlis * « ■ „ 1 - I °'t < val 8A ad fdTiia daaa? *XAiaaa8 al a/oAlal^tb -boai bXdoo aw •et bXvoda aw .aoAlq ^oo$ laao XXa /a taoa 11 luS .ned/ it XXIw /i JbitA :ba«iroaa oacow tb oar: a «« JbXldo fX//lX qiava btA8 " j* 't. « ^ aaqod baa aanao ^dlidibot 1« bXtow a Sana i^a^iaodoo btf qXioAa ^ • " ' t • , .- f w ^ bXoow ^oaalol lo aabl f\aw adi' . to^itxibnt bXuov t^Xtooaa aXii/• • ♦ • XXaw aa baa , aooX / Aals*pX lOo nl jl/wcts- XXu^ 'fiad/ be ’ I • A i f fjL*\ aaod/ ,babd lad/o ad/ aO ,ooao /a oaaow boa ae« aoad oTjdi;^ ■ 2 i*' >«al OA /tfod/lw ,a*iav /2 aa ,'xayafl aiA /aalal aa /aoX avad odw v u . ' ' ' ■■'^' - , f - “ j, -on ,aaaaa oao' al ,odw aaoanaq ^Xao adf onA/^jtcddT .bXldo /oAl a ad/ d/i» eioddsibO tibdf dniatat qad/ 'baa ; tVAWXA /X 'oXa/^ -oAcow baa boodffAm 0/ qo «oi8 ubibLldo nad/o ad9 .aabX oatAe %• ocoXa aao ald7 .t/XXa/iofi lo aasoAdo ad./,XXA talt-ua bad ,bood a/1 d/Xw /I ba/aa^na aad d/Aad .bXiiio XA/noral oa banabitat aX d/ixox lo a^Arl X«ata/a na o/al /X baaaaXd baa ,aaandaiAd qlbnl/C 49 In a manner equally informal, and quite as serious, in spite of surface playfulness, he speculates in a kind of first draft up« on his view of a future state. He suggests his attitude in the title. ^ For him heaven is not heaven, unless its El^sian fields duplicate, at least remind him of England’s green lanes, brown dells, breezy skies, and Hampstead’s ... woods that let mansions through. And cottaged vales with pillowy fields beyond. And clump of darkening pines, and prospects blue. And that clear path through all, where daily meet 2 Cool cheeks, and brilliant eyes, and morn-elastic feet. Familiar as all strange things must have been to one of his imagi- native insight, ’’poetry and calamity, surprise and strange sights of the imagination,” yet he could not reconcile himself to a be- lief in, nor adjust his habits of life to^a future ’’Paradise Mount” that did not in most ways correspond to actual paradise mounts in any pretty village in England. He pleads for "some snug interlun- ar spot” where, three hundred years hence, he may be dining, and drinking tea with Shakespeare, and Spenser, and Boccaccio, and Sir Walter Scott; and "the Arabian Nights must bear us company.” Yet even this stopping off place to a higher heaven must be progres- sive. ”We cannot,” he says, "well fancy a celestial ancient Brit- ton delighting himself with painting his skin, or a Chinese angel hobbling a mile up the Milky Way in order to show herself to ad- vantage , ” Though he does not say so, yet we fancy him, when tired of 1. "An Earth Upon Heaven.” in The Companion for April 2, 1828. 2. "To Hampstead.” in Examiner, Nov, 12, 1815. » 1-r • nJ d4 bat * » iMSi’to'lttt xtitupit^^t>atit§x^‘t ^1" ' M ' ,v '■ “ ’ i -q» Jdin to balx « ai «d?*X i • til^ooidl aaoidadoi JdX itiU db^ow 1 ‘ > ,bacx*^ dblfltii 1 ^* 6 ddlir dfXdr pfs^sttoo PaA \ • BtrXii aieoqtotq bot ,$oaiq %alaot\tb \q qmttlo b«A /f> , " Jtfi‘ ♦- iddm ^lidb •iei<« ,Ht d3aoi4J dJaq i*®Xo tadJ baX .iooJ oUBAlti^atom bat ^oatlllid ba«',ifdtdflo XooO i' '■ * '■'• . ‘Jlf vn aid to eao pi aood, orta skt/a Bgalds atUIaist .Jff^ fcidsld, d^CdtJd bat oaiiqiaa . XrdXao^ bfld ♦ f d»i§«l^ oVlJ da' ^ ^ , 'V'. J *' 't. ' ,'‘J; •00 t oj tlddwlri dlionoodi Joa blaoo dd '^dt ^ ,«ci 4 « ddi to ■■'Vti'.' V- » . - - ‘ . -' * C ' ’ 'V' ' u bed .Jiaiolb dO ,*‘j ,dO«Ort Btf\ bffbaUiX ttyOi , diortw, **^oqa la •laae^ tdlfidiaq" o^xttsaj t^oi tjil to alidad’ aid Skul.tt ibd ,ai toljf nl tjaaofl! •jelbaii^q laoioa ol i, bat }lVo»8 idOXaft V '• I _ __ «, »*■ ^..i,''’ 'f ♦.ddtioiq *0 OdD« oovadd ,iddilri a ol' doalq tto aaiqqoJd aldi advd" *«i -Ili 8 Jodloaa Xailddldo a t;onat XXdV*^ ,ditad od *',afooaao dfll^'^ :*,|fvld .Xe^oa aadoidC a'lO .alto aid «allalaq^^da Iw tXatald •kaUd'ulltlf: aoi •ba 01 tXd*io 4 aoda qi. lobio qi ^dXXll adl. q« din?ha aalXddod J ■» a y r ■■ ^ .. V “*Hr V ' L . ■■■-. . .’' y“. . '• * to bdiii oddw ,aXd ^oaat •% it\ *^d ^a«" lp*b »' ' k,? ■■ ‘ . j ■ ffi ' '^' J ■ > ■** V " ■i. sa. A£CX ,S XXiqA tOt doldaqaqO ddt «i *• Waa»^ .axax ,'SX , fOU- *d«l«axJi;.j 4 X '•* .baol dcqwaH' bT” ".s ft 50 writing poetry, tired of being light-hearted in company, tired of conversing with divine friends, we fancy him roaming in Elysian fields with Her (’’true; oh, so true, that you take her word as you would a diamond"); or when tired of roaming, imagine him in some Ear th-Blys ian wilderness confiding to Her that "A book of verses underneatKa bough A jug of wine, a loaf of bread -- and thou Beside me singing in the wilderness. Oh, wilderness were paradise enow." Only that "wine" in Hunt's case would undoubtedly be tea. Flip- pant and light-hearted, his attitude toward the Great Adventure may seem. And it was a seeming; no more. For life, fundamentally, was very serious to him, and Death and the future no less so. He was afraid of neither, cried Hail and Farewell with a smile. He wanted to let go of life gently, and by degrees; he wanted not to be loosed entirely from the eartn, not at once. Earth and its cap- abilities, its little accomplishments and its great and unfulfilled aspirations must surely, somewhere closely linked with the place of beginnings, come to a more perfect fruition. So Hunt believed. "Is there no beautiful realization of the fleeting type that is shown us? No body to this shadov/? No quenching to this taught and continued thirst? No arrival at these natural homes and resting- places, which are so heavenly to our imaginations, even though they be built of clay, and are situate in the fields of our infancy? We are becoming graver than we intendedi but to return to our prop- er style." We began this chapter with comments on "Getting up on Cold Mornings," and we think it not amiss to end it with what we may lo flt b#a f Sal**i'to hittti ^ '• >>. ' ' -^ . V -fc "" _ . ^ a^iitxa ni nfliiC4»cn xiJi %aa^i »• ,«Aadit^ •aitjb iiilw ^ 9 fao» i'r -1' •• i«ii vitsf COX 3Ti»iit ,oan) 0 9 ,do foE dilw eJbX#ii ^ ' i ' §mon ai Kid *)» 0 ist«OT 1© tfljt^ fi©d«r to i < i»loo»** " '• ' ^ tf©Ai t#K 0 If ^alb i\ao 0 9%Mt9t>i l9i aMl9xL$mtii*ut7i %. , ' ’ ' * ^ d-nap^ M,4JM9a1t9)bttC 99919t 1© ,3lOO d 1» oofli b©© -- fcs»td to t©oi^a , »w'lir--t^ 30 ^;,jL .©^r^*»ll-^l^J^l^ iaa i Onaq|^ ,tXXa^ooa:al)ai/t .»tlX to% .•toe On ' 4 a'"*aw 11 Jbiri .ro#« P* . ' J .. W ' ©B ,»o« ©©©X On attfint^o/lj ban dlaoC X>a© ,aid of ©noit©© vtot aav “ ^ -.•nt*’ • It 9P .©ilc'fi A ifi Iw XXawOtal um* Xla'*' l^ei-so^ ,toilJl©n to ’^X>lAtlA iaw r _ * 01 Jofl |)#JCi:v »/l •coiTStb to OB 4#x ol^iJflflAW -{©» ©w Jnd-© ©ilw 1^1 j>a© ol ©ele© loit 11 .:;tixildl 0 © bat© **,©B©lAioli;' iT f * i k* L ▼ « . . TT* 51 find worth saying about the essay on ’’Sleep.’* This, Mr, Hunt tells us^, was Hazlitt’s favorite of the **Indicator” essays, ’’per- haps because there is a picture in it of a sleeping despot,” adds Mr. Hunt, But Hazlitt insisted ’’with more enthusiasm than he was accustomed to do,” that it was the conclusion about the parent and the bride that appealed most to him. May either be the reason, or neither. We are not concerned in the right answer, nor the wrong. For us the essay has the charm of mingled humor and poetic musings. Our laugh is neither loud nor long over Mr. Hunt’s description of the inopportuneness of uninvited sleep; it is probably nothing more than a disturbance of the muscles that communicate amusement; but we do feel an inward chuckle, or groan, depending on whether we re- call ourselves as being the observer or the observed, disturbing our composure as we read of the discomfiture annoying the compla- cency of those who exercise the misunderstood privileges of sleep in company. It is not precisely the proper thing, he says, ”to es- cape into slumber from an argument; or to take it as an affair of course, only between you and your biliary duct; or to assent with involuntary nods to all that you have Just been disputing; much less is it well to sit nodding and tottering beside a lady; or to be in danger of dropping your head into the fruit plate or your host’s face; or of waking up and saying 'Just so* to the bark of a dog, or ’Yes, madam,’ to the black at your elbow,” Perhaps the laugh we indulge in over this and over what he says about clowns and sleeping despots, is not altogether hearty. 1. ”Indicator” for January 12, 1820. 2. ”Autobiography , ” edited by Ingpen, II, 50. fid # ijffi ^ '*1 4uuH .tt ♦•ltl(r no salted ■n^tow.Tblill ' ' «t -Te<|»*, ix*«60 •*^o^)»ftId3l*‘ ^d/ ttt tii’iote't n*Uitn£B haw ,^kff aXIti / * M^a* ;iftXeooXtt « 1^0 ^1 ai « •! «q«d ' Tl a4» 4d KtAMiittfd: tik Area dfit” £03»tuAl iltiltaB, Jsr8 i r i)fl* iatiJBq dxfJ Jaodj flol •i/Jo0oo‘ od3 ba« ii •*,0Jt» oJ ft»»o^8ffoox4 ^ 10 .aovAai 6A} »d letf^Xa oJ d«o« baUoqqa ablid vAt .8aoi<» ion .lovoflA adJ al boditoaoo r »4 of . 3 ,^$ita r ' ,a^at9(/a olJtoq ban tfStc^d DoXsaic ariJMlo Vdrf aftd y«« 4 o adi «w ? ^ IQ noi iqi4n.tti^ • *9ajvK .rxjf i»yo jdoX ibu ’''booX i#a^ tl d^u^iX idP ^ I . ■'■>: ■' ’' > r . •V /^aldioft xldadoiq al it {qodXa bailtoijxn to, aaofla.iiflriioqQoaX* 3trd ; fa&i\tfttrgra $Jattatrmmo 0 iadi a«rD€vai odjr ‘^o* oo^ad'ccrialV a aadi - , ' . ,.»ji -al aw ladiaflw ao salbdaqat «aaai 9 to .aXatouxio biavai oa Xaal ob adr ► , / i*’ W ' -^uldiusklh .bariatoo adl no la/iaaea aili aa aailaaiuo XX«o -aXQfljoo 641 BoX^Qttoa aiul l^fflootib edi to babi aw aa ai&toqxnop xuo ( qaaXt Jc booloiabnoaim a4# aaioiaaa odw aaoitl to.xooooi IS ’ J2^ -10 el*" , a^aa a4 .laqoiq' add qlaalotiq Jbd al l{ .iCAaqoot) dX S to iiatla ita aa il alai ol lo xloan^Bia na xcoDt lodotuXa Dial »qao fill* Isoaaa oi no ;lO 0 l> qiatXlti nvo^ bna sHj‘>{ oaawlad \ta « ‘.V _ V" L to Inatf adl oi *oa Xaot#’ saltaa baa xu to no 'jooat a’#ao4 f * - 4 T» ".wotJXa isio\ la ioaid odl oJ *,B!abft« ,aaY^ to ,sob a ^ ' * ‘ , ' ■ i> .'■4 #4 latlw narq baa. a 141 loro «l aBlt/bai aw dBoaX ' Odl toadno^ * ? i' ' a... ■ ^ , titbad nadioBOiXa loa al taiaqaab BoitiaaXo baa adaroXo isooa aqaa ,* ■ r,.'7 * IF if. i. 0S,6X ',ttX tta{roaidnoi»^**tolaolb0l^ "?X . ,0^ »H ,a«qBai '%d ballbO •* , t^^^otBoldoiaa*' fii l| 'ii , , ‘ 52 not q^uite objective; perhaps it has a painful personal note in it, an element of uncomfortable memories, and comes with a blush, and a bit shamefaced; for we may realize, to our secret selves, that others besides clowns and despots may be unlovely in sleep. The knitter up of raveled care may be beautiful in figures of speech, but in figures of flesh and blood not precisely enchanting. In our waking moments we may be good to look upon. We may be proud in our walk, dainty in the way we eat; we may wear our evening at- tire with the air of infinite superiority; in a word, we may show ourselves grand even in trifling things. But asleep, we are the manikins of a petrifying tyrant. Sleep is no respecter of persons. He arrests us in the most rediculous postures; no limb-twisting Charlie Chaplin could rival them. "Imagine a despot lifted up to the gaze of his valets, with his eyes shut, his mouth open, his left hand under his right ear, his other twisted and hanging help- lessly before him like an idiot’s, one knee lifted up, and the other leg stretched out, or both knees huddled up together; what a scarecrow to lodge majestic power ini" But if Sleep is unkind, so is he kindly too. And it is as kindly that the poets have most frequently treated him. The authors to whom Mr. Hunt refers us are many, and of the best. Ovid, Spen- ser, Chaucer, Sophocles, and Beaumont and Fletcher are called up- on in praise of sleep. As one of his favorite passages on sleep he quotes from Beaumont and Fletcher’s "Valentinian, " "Care-charming Sleep, thou easer of all woes. Brother to Death, sweetly thyself dispose On this afflicted prince. Fall like a cloud V "T =ter. n • &0 • V J 5 • .ft fli v»7on tgaoMic<{ total « e«4 fl sqAjiioa ;9vi$o«t<)o 9ilup ,Jqu .c ' ';!* . ' ■•■ a *'& Jbnj! •f^«o£Ioo*iq 9C xsa •! •noqtr ilooX tcroa •<> x#* A^aowoa ^jolatAW -iA aoinoff TWO -iAt<» XA«» •» ) tAA on oA^'a! ^talMb fAlAV too Wf 4 il 14 AO 4 rW A ul ; t ^ ^ toi t »qA« AiiditoX ito 'xls fiii Sitt 9 # 11(1 Oflj ot« AW .qooXoA ^oa ,«Bo ^44 ifliXliTU nf q»TA.i^AAta ••▼Xwsto© I •taoA'xAq tc *tc»J0eq8wt OA »1 ,q,»9Ui^:3ak-i\H a to '»Aiail;«Ao 1 *‘ ' ‘ ‘*- k anlTAlwJ-oiuti ofl ' ;ootuJAOq •uoiuotb 9 'i Iawo «iU al aj/ «l«e»ttA tO)l I ■ , iTV 7 > ' 03.,-QV tAJtll /oqAAfc A oai^flSl*' .awilJ •XavX'i l>iooc QJn4MdO 9 U%m4P - ,aoqo iUuom Aiil ,joAa aox* tXil ctjiw •tjoiov ttd to •oM’^ oAi' ■jf- '., , -ql *4 t>AA b^wiaivs loA^o ala ,*tba 443 !% tia iaJ^ao baoA AteX 1 y oAi bno .qo boJttL ooaH oao •^’^oiti aa Mi r wlA ototAO xXa»«I . t r lAjlw, jiAtlJ A-^oi qo b>Xf>JboA AiAixX a3o«J to ,ioo‘ &«do.fwt^tt' »a| teii^o f ^ UAtt ***at tAwoq «^boi o;f wotootAO* a i*s ■ ( ' .' . V s ■■ ■,^.'. . tA tX ii b(iA .ool xXboXat od ai'oa •Xnl^'ao »t qoolB" 11 AoS ^ ktodiuM odf .ailr botootit xX#fl»i»i»*tl ^ odm ovMd^ stooq odi i»d 3 xXbaX:A f* -iiaqC .JJlTO ./aod nA9 to bn# •qaaci oto ao Atolwt JOt/R •til xno4* oi^ ■ 1 , *r bwlloo otA toAodfXt baA jtAO«crA#a bno ••oXoOftqoB •tocAAtiO .tot 0(1 qofXa no *-«« 3 At» 0 Aq ttfitoroi alri ,to aco «a .qae/t to bolAtq at ao ' i ■ ', ,4 f ** •oAlaljaAlot** • * tivitodol*! baa saotn» 9 o^ mott* 0 ‘ ^ ''#• .'A boo I Cj «>«)■( IX IlAt 4<>C‘fllltq bA^OlXltO A)t(4 V% kU A / ■Ss=xsi — rr--:sa=B 3 asBi ««-^^^^ X, qiuii^ V( '. x!ll 1 .^ SBmI'IIU " i B Oywill m 53 In gentle showers; give nothing that is loud Or painful to his slumbers: easy, light. And as a purling stream, though son of ITight , Pass by his troubled senses: sing his pain Light hollow murmuring wind, or silver rain Into this prince, gently, oh gently slide; And kiss him into slumbers, like a bride.'* •♦Sleep," he concludes, "is most graceful in an infant; soundest, in one who has been tired in the open air; completest, to the sea- man after a hard voyage; most welcome, to the mind haunted with one idea; most touching to look at, in the parent that has wept; lightest, in the playful child; proudest, in the bride adored.'* 1 it; - t ii. l>voi «i %AUUna ; iVV«r'^it« «l;iU9S al » X *^* cld oj Xulal^q 'tQf 10 aeti /tsooa) ^aiXivq 9 b« liaA ittmti «iA ?^Bl« : buXdooil tixl qd bba^ jm *t»vl)>* TO ,baX« • 3aiTa{QTVff woXibd ^^ 9(4 * 1 ^ ;«x>iX« . V BOCtXiq oXfi^ otfll « j ^ • d BAil' , »T0d«jiIt ddul aliil «ald baA j. *• ^1 H . r ;XBobooOtt iJixmial nc st ialBOdtS dion bX* ,B«bu£Dfloo I. » - < , , .1 „ T~afB td) 01 , d«tf';XtXqaoo‘'* . {*xlA aoqO d##d add odv «BO di ■ « . M k ddiw bodoood Irr aiti od ,affidoXow ^aotfr~ 1 030X0 ir bToil a^toOIa nB«t / 1" • - ’•* * 7;' Ti ® tOqair B2ii :iadJ Jn»t»q add ai ,d« dooX od ^criAotrDd lKO(n fg0b‘l %tto '- fc'^v .- ' t t , I' * >n i ' ^ ' 1.1 '. 'XjAa , **.ba*robo 9bX*td add oi , d aabtfonq ; bX Ido •diAdllaiX. .j; i,»' . • t ■ < I » '-1 iri- . V’. il <>m - OT d • «|i ;i j i' «» CV -Ifc, ’4 f ■ir # L^iir'j I *, »v ' ; f' < ‘Kwwm ■- ™ ■i:.* a.. ■ i <♦4! “ " V,] ai' ;, "I 54 V CRITIC AND CENSOR- GENERAL Ostentatious impartiality. ••Puffing and pun- ning." A moral Quixote, Rules to violate. Praise to the praiseworthy. Self-appraisal. Leigh Hunt’s earliest critical writings on matters theatri- cal were articles contributed to a little paper called the "News," set up in 1805 by his brother John."^ Extracts from these con- tributions subsequently formed a fifty-eight page appendix to an original volume on the same subject, entitled, "Critical Essays on the Performers of the London Theatres." These considerations of the actor’s art constituted an innovation in dramatic criti- cism and created a new field for the familiar essay. Tney brought Leigh Hunt into the public eye by their unprec i dent ed independence of opinion and impartiality. Evidently he was resolved to pull the stage out of the vitiated state into which it had gone, for he tells us that "he is resolved, that if the somniferous drama- tists will suffer him to keep his eyes open and hold his pen, and while he is honored with the public attention, no dull dramatic knave Shall walk the stage in quiet to his grave. But this only if there is nothing to praise. 1, That is, John printed and apparently edited it for the pro- prietors. In the "Autobiography" Leigh states that he knew so little of the proprietors that he could not with certainty rec- ollect any one of them. t: 1 , 1 , ‘"I ■ u ' m ■ ■ - ■ y;^? 3 -’apj VVii ) f WJ iAs:£H 3 e.ji^£%f d diti oiTifQ *no«x tarn Mnoi r«l« 0 ;} to .•^tioiv ci •tTiyfl .d^toticrp l 0 in!filtt"*-- ♦^'» 8 iti« . CitltT^q t-ir^t' . YiSi‘tC»W 00 £a’i 4 0 ‘j » . a ' r, -Xliia rsi flvi 4 «v«uai o« Aa 4 iT 4 ; 4 aiioo Jx# «*to^o 4 I *44 ^la /) ' V .Xaata lallimjn PtU roX 4X»Xt %ao a totJaaxo htfjittftlo , ' • ’ •■ ' 'll . . ■ tt4 0tfcXD«xqiMJ xX»44 x^ PrCi plltl/^ 'pdi^piay 4niUB ftcog ,&04 4 i dol 4 w 44 oi t 4 « 4 t JboJfrUXx oal iko iuo oga^a §44 itrcxtfXXanoa §4^ li 3§4t »i§rXo«§t ai §d“ 4»44 ao aiXi»i §4 [ oat .ntq ala l>Ioa hsis aoqc aiixa tlEd cr^tojC o4 «l6 iXXv a^it '■f 4.- 4 ♦ aol 4 o§ 4 Ja olldwq §44 fl 4 i% l»§xo^o/i kX §4 iXXdw^ pfada Qi4«9§rtt Xltit oa. §¥§19 aid oi Joiop al » 8 « 4 a §44 dXav Xladg . ry ' i ■ ' , ■„, " ' >• i • it t' ' S' . illt i ^alrltoa §X »x§44 IX Tl\ *3 71 ' JM, t -onq §K4 tot 4X i)>4fbe hpa fif^aXao ; fi46^ ,al iMT .1 » .■•>a a*ni( or* 4^X§4 M4 jTl'i|-toJ§Xxq.,.^,X“' -ppt \^nt» 4 tPo A^'i^ LiiT^Hf §4 ^'t 4 l' 1 1 , 4 , 4 f.ltqoTq amir 4. '.i. iffltJiX to f Ao, x< 0 a to§l‘l 9 '‘ I , .*. 1*1 • ' - i'Jy'\ ’ il 55 It must not be supposed that there were no ’‘professional" critics when Leigh Hunt was tickling the public by pinching the players. Then as nov/, there were "gentlemen'’ who did the theatres and gave what the public took for criticism, but which was in re- ality "a draft upon the box office, or a reminiscence of last Thurs day’s salmon and lobster sauce. Hot only that, but it was cus- tomary for editors, who were also the proprietors of papers^to be intimate with actors and dramatists*, and under such circumstances it was inevitable that critics, actors, and playwrights should tickle one another with the feathers they stuck in one another's hats. Puffing and giving of tickets, interchange of amenities, and flattery of power on one side and puns on the other^were the order of the day. Into this well-oiled critical machinery that produced, for the price of a ticket or a lobster supper, ar\ "exce 1 lent '* Mr. Ban- nister, a "Charming" Mrs. Jordan, a "crowded house," and a stage upon which "the whole went off with eclat," Mr. Hunt came with the twenty-three year old zeal of a Sir Galahad, ready to carve the masks of men, "guided by nothing but a regard for truth, for the real pleasure of the town, and for the literary reputation of 2 Englishmen." His comments were undoubtedly juveni le , ( "Good GodI 3 to think of the grand opinion I had of myself in those days.") and a little conceited; but they were entirely honest, and sincere and in most cases just, for which reasons they had a wholesome ef- 1. "Autobiography", edited by his son, 1860, p. 138. 2. "Critical Essays of the Performers of the London Theatres," in the Appendix, page 16. 3. "Autobiography," ed. by his son, 1860, p. 139. .■S3 *' («ao on tp^^os ♦<# i ;*4 J ^ffc /I 3'''n< .a ,.1 Ml*- I. oti> ttf oiiauti *1H4 jixilIaJoA# «»« ipij»l|' a•^»■l»ox^ lio r. ’ B '"' '' • ■• ■■* ' \ A n^i^M§jiJ mdi biit aav * a©ir*! 4^^pv •‘ipifji ,woff «« at>(i7 .MttxsSq . , _ ^ - I ... -•1 nl &4IV daldv fvd , jrg : oUXio /lol »y OiZdiyq td4 ^J54 » »v«b t*4l Itf •O09ixAXHl(n#^ 9^ 10u«90lt*0 XQd '•/i^ .COOA i SJllli 4»» itJXX* - f *’ fHo 4Xw J I doo ** ttoofiB tBinppl Pa« 0901 st o*\;sl \m \ *. U ' • ")■ ^ fii OrJ^CsntQxq tO »^o ^ n i iqpxq* tdf ot£s S’lWW.Otii* \ tO% \*iMit0Si r* ^•t^OAdiamoo'ii 0 Moao i,9t}uv tas ;oJ oi fsa-Mib bam inofvs rfjlw sismt^al t‘lf/->dii oid^\-tstq boa ,MioiDs johj olPst tfoai fsw 41 n-t|4j-9n«^ 900 ol touio qsds pioaiss^ «4i,^t 9£r;r^ io -fl «'» frj* ;'iA iplt ,i>po0&o*iq. Jmd4 q’tsaiApocp ^ooLft'it bsUlQ^tlom •Itfj, piul * -,v, -axe .«5ll *' lamllmoxs* ffo , ifqqxrii /t#4 adol 0 tfo Josjoi? » to ooiiq _ , " V- :1b [ a%A9 0 A bus **.f««/oii bsb%0,it^ M^^asbtc*^ . 4 - 1 II ^-^BisnAnO” A ,0»«»Xn ditw odAO'^awB .lie ^edxXp* OIXn tto 4ccpv stodv pA4** doldw noon ' ■ ■ < i .,“ -> •ti«o o3 ^toto tbsdoisv> s to tsst tip loot oftd J -tltfaoOi ssip 001 *il4oi4 opt 0*Xioj|oi s 3 tit ^alA3oa t** Po0'4\v®*" , » oott < lb esCoxoii odi f " ’ : . ‘ ^■ ' ' . r1. ^ [ tc ooliAfoqoo Si'imimiil s6: not bae litvoS sd3 to onvoxola Xxon 9 d$ l ' . 1 * ' fl‘ ■> ' -,'V- , I ® “ i \ •'^ \ ' I , ;i>pr fidoO*') ,»X loovp^ Xlbp^taobau ^low i7asunbt> oiH »• . of aideX X®aS I I I ” . eto<^ 04004 ol l£t«%1^ ^ a. ■ 0 ♦ t&X tUnti^rb Ij»c IJ bo H 9({ ^iinrofiic^iftroo ixoiio ti^ilttOL fti\ 9ii) l>#it9JCc*7Vd*‘ r«te ^C 18 rt»lftk Jan? ««rt'U«d '■■1 t^;,’ • ' f ”'"'*^** tfBma'tirot X*o/J,iTP •df, c«» liH f; .oiJitc bUdinaib |i:^^ ' ■ 1 ft '^' ^■> rfi tX*>B«J 6 iS .^tfXwr^opfl« to «#Olrt OAI «oit nl t«l)O« 9 O 0 i oj 1 » V, I ^'.• 3 *f 0 fflo %$ b«ytoaoi> odw OaiiY odJiT^iJiw od -jodJo aid Xi 4 i,fli «* ♦•atXtiiilio'^otri^adTb 'airi 1 flloifar ooj aettf ovdd is ^xsca oK . o^OIi«pJ'^al^;l» to tdijC a «d« • >li tystsdo 9ii •^iiaad efd lisal 3 uc^, nuA ’’Xiiti** * to .1 -ij i>tta \it^ 6 osl 9 aid ••« of .B 0 oXottviv bua , tfaofteoqoAa X ,oiooaiii ^iia )!»' oaoXj£siIdo Rtoit aoit ^XoiX^ao fd od noili/Xooc*^ aXd al laoaobdo^obaX saidiKioYo /noTt tooXa tXdi»Xt tXoacld #8 .bairf Tivo^adw to -xc« 00 »oo< 0?” .baiqvt-sdo oo q3 tI»XU b«W qXnaToaaoo^^doiriw d^iw It* 99a oolv « ooi o^ banaoqqd’* » axa* od " , tXX* aoa.t^q -lo j eaont iodoiJ « b*4q090« «• dOAioq oo«ad evdii tail o« bXaow I QUfJ All badd’s^ooXi X 00 ^on maioiilto old to v^XojTvIt odt ”«Oondaodd Odd *T' . ooldX'to adtf tot qw w«ti» oxf voXat oitldaii "lo ioa icfXwoXXot Hdd '‘PD't \d bofliXdOflTbo »X toqaqoooo o tO iXdlno-Xxloitdaodd arid ntitio ,**iamolo9 dttii odi to oao o^duf^ ootwoo to ^Ilw ^ foaoritnott oq m to dd^Xa ibdd- cib, ‘otd«odd o.«. ...oadOxX' Aobobto L Ota aoxcd toq‘a..no«*o« A'* »•' .. r ■: : 'W' ^ L.' '-ii' A ;o«ioa ^«A^A « ■ ’*4 aoi o4ir ,»ao- Aflo : i«qqfi^7«(tA/s a ^ :^aaoXat«q ,lo Jioil V ,"jk ■fo» •‘sq4oA Afll^ JL« ■ i'“ -*ll»qqa »i4T .i»inq-a«pl < ^oVaioJaxi -i‘ % , oqoq .Ili 03 n*irA» ad 4e*iX XXa la oolX 9A3 ao (x«ra Ic taiTtfX J«t 0 n a
  • o«iA erit riJlw bozlm f oaroXqqao^oAtfaXqqo Xaftioriai/ baa b«>baffAdnU*'a os VXirtdtfpOTt ai otaiilq alAT = .5fXuo tXq 2o • •tfod-yaXq oajr )e aotiotf oAt la baao'Y od u3 f • colq a floltqoi^ot Odx saitaioib aX alXig'^ oorfX tti booanvcLitM $u qalq, odt .dJXa Ian tad aa «KiiX-.ban aX baJaiiq ^IXatoao* kx a|lXd ^ Aoidv d3l%' x3soboa oxU 2o ^Idaob oa •ntldoia X •• ,aatrXa«a.aAi lo^Aaaqa xod: f;i , A .V. ^ -_i • Jjqa •• w I 3? i i|j(G ^oopablTo aTl^/batdaobsa Aialaa ajXXX' a 2o aaivloitta toAlo baa ' ' ' ll '■'''^ n ' 'J' ‘ &’ r dtitXajaa 2o ttoaabiva ftrj^ a«Ia \6idl 3u6 , qoaabl2aoa«>tXoa lavo 2^ •'■ " ■ ' ' '*a X “laXq laXaqoq ApaAjta bl daaoao auaaaiiooe ^^atXiakoX a baa tlaaoo'xl I * '■ - , ■■ -S" ‘•,#f ^ ^ .fei osaq .aibflfqqA «*otfa XablJXiO" ,X B O' 56 writers of the day for their '♦miserable** productions; the manag- ers were scored for their want of taste, the critics for their cor- ruption, and the actors for their supercilious satisfaction with their own personal perfection. ("There’s a lady in the stage-box contemplating my shapel The critics in the pit are astonished at my easel My character sits well on me, and so do my small-c lothes 1'^ He classifies the principal local improprieties of the actors as "Gating at the boxes. Adjusting the dress. Telling the audience their soliloquies. Wearing their hats in rooms, and Not wearing them in the open air."^ "A few words from the critical benches, or a shout of ♦put on your hat!^ from the galleries^ might end them at once." He* admits that this criticism from the galleries might be unpleasant for the act- or, but the actor should take care not to deserve it. He harped a 2 good deal on Mr. Kemble’s "vicious" pronunciation , women’s male 3 4 attire , and the need for modesty." Of all his criticisms. Pope as a tragic actor came in for the severest: "... When Shakespeare wrote his description of "a robustious fellow, who tears a passion to tatters," one would suppose that he had been shewn by some supernatural means the future race of actors, as Macbeth had a prophetic view of Banquo’s race, and that the robustious phantom was Mr. Pope. Here is an actor then without face, expression, or delivery, and yet this 1. "Critical Essays, etc." Appendix, p. 2. 2. Idem, Appendix, pp. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10. 3. Idem, 45, 166, 175, and Appendix 21. 4. Idem, 179, 209. ffl M) s\ J'V*' j •OBiiotribonq tltdi lol: #di, to» i ■** -,9op tlttdi -^iy 0oli’X’i& «di i tsM^^ ft . tol Atvoot •tftV «i« •> sv I4f cvtil 9 a« fitfoi Xio'tuiQii/ii^'irloil} to^ tnoJo« ^At ba;« *xt6i^qvic ■ ■•* « «idv al * M’»i«iiT''-) «ao Xtf tsaiodtwq cr«i» «' ’ r ItlStinotaA »ci# al tolllio »4T ^.*bqAii« sailAXqlitijfaoc i l^AUtic-’ll %iJ oh Q9 ^a* ,*01 ao XXtv •}!* *Y*/o«i«ito '<■ \ II' «« qfOiefl *A7 To Uti^ot^qoiqml X«soX n*iI9 **iTi!s«itio tH \,«#3i;od *c(;t ilJi ^alii^Cf*' 1 ; -i. I '* ’j 5 , »«iX »poI X lo • itorfd *cwe«Xbtf«. *t(i> laiXXoT r [il taB , asroo't iiX oaX***#^ ' \ i. 3 ,tla a<9iiO *ilJ al m^A4 lot( *TtfOT tt« jrarq# to juoAb » To ,*oftcao4 X«oiiiTo^e4j otoit «liio« w*T . ' ? 14 . 30di 89Xrl>« oB “.•oao 7m Bifla Jho* /c*Xt«XXji 9 olt^^vbiT ^!9iid «IO£ *49 tot 9A*l4*Xqa* *d 9ll9Xm »oXtoXI 4I9 *47 BOTt %tlbX9lTO .*149 ‘ li T 4 tOC;T4l0/’ *B .7i •VT4«HX) 09 9ojr OtAO *3(49 l>{«04f T090* *49 90<9%TlF01l , OO 1 94 toaodoiq 0 '' d tu*t[ ,*t!8 ao X«*4 4009 •? •qoa • 4 X 4 #9ot« •nA0q***jr4b noilW ^ SI Tj , iS> • , **0a^<9« bltfOV *00 **,«*SM9*9 o9 aoX04Hiq O «T0*9 OdV ,«oiX*i ^" '.’'O' • Toifft oXU u^jiiosn XoTuXoaToq** ocRoa/^tt^^ 0>o4« a**4 haul *4 9*49 ® l? A’oopn*S,Tc **X* oliOktf.qoTq « £>*4 49 o4 oqX »ji ,*to9oa"T* •0«i 'ji ' ' ^ ^ - ji y e« *X wx*? •*qo^> .t3X *** Ao90«4q^. 100 X 9«0Oot *49 9*49 bo* ,ot>*T f ,1# ■ X49 7*t I»o* ,qn*.irl|ob TO ,ooX«**'xqxo ,ooa^T 9ir*49Xv o* 49 to9o« -1 ,a ,q /xXb4*qqA ".o** ,*t*4*il X*oi9X*iO** .1 , -OX ,? ,'4- , A. rfli ,qq \xXb0oqqA *9»*X>X V X i "' 3E Xb * oqq A? »*'A o-« /3 V' X i » 4 A ,0**1 , ' . .-. 1 W ,a*4l H' £9 complications of negative qualities finds means to be clap- ped in the theatre." And here, according to Mr. Hunt, is the unfailing method of obtaining a clap. "It consists in nothing more, than in gradually raising the voice as the speech draws to a conclusion, making an alarming outcry on the last four or five lines, or suddenly dropping them into a tremulous but energetic undertone, and with a vigorous jerk of the right arm rushing off the stage. All this as- tonishes the galleries; they are persuaded it must be some- thing very fine, because it is so important and so unintel- ligible, and they clap for the sake of their own reputation.^ ... Mr. Pope has but two gestures, which follow each other in monotonous alternation, like the jerks of a toy-shop har-* lequin; one is a mere extension of the arms, and is used on all occasions of candour, of acknowledgement , of remonstrance, and of explanation; the other for occasions of vehemence or of grandeur, is an elevation of the arms, like the gesture of Raphael’s "St. Paul Preaching at Athens," an action which becomes the more absurd on common occasions, from its real 2 sublimity. " In much the same way that Hunt criticises Mr. Pope’s two gestures, he criticises his two facial expressions: one "a flat indifference which is used on all sober occasions, and an angry frown which is used on all impassioned ones." U 1, This thrust at the audience makes one wish that Hunt were alive to "current-comment" on the Washington Conference and the pub- lic thanks-giv ing festivals decreed in honor of it. Gullibility ranging the haunts of men can still find signs of "Rooms to let. 2. "Critical Essays, etc." pages 22, 23, 24, f^a - u.ix'o^ ..V : r/j I,.' 'u*' Bixo i ? 40 1 1 qwo 0 " «• .> • -I • •* ::*n . c-H . 0.. r»UA f>£iJ aJL , f i I ,q4.*r t .'. All* il i ^ i I L^iliau . •• >t tii« T L / 4 t% i iu'iii fifi’toai .jaid^oa O . s ^ •afri au{oac*L ift ■ >»:iJt':;qa'Xj;. v. i!:©M'a», tc* ,«oaiJC •'*'1';; *>c* '-'t Jai&l ' fir?*^ ' ... « » 9IT0 4 *1 •^i;aiii Oi ^ '.'ia" ’'fXTf #«s' ■•■■'a: i « ■' It©' *£: ^ i: f- ;r'** 4fd^i'i t.fJ Ho 'C*i©'^ ''''' crc a v: V u ."v Ji !->.*• • . n*;*. '*©.'14 : *j f> i 1 1 1 :i M Ji, f^dJ soa 4 . 1 ao 4 i> f.© 4tt'J*tl.uri u« ®1 ..-JU, ' .j'r.ii'J* 1 ^S>V ' -*■ .-©f ' ni Cf.; ro ^rt : - jH \f:d^ .©Ldl^U ■■ ■-'••*: .*^ir ^CiJol iioJw^ , r. . T*i j cvf-‘ ■ * k/J a#d \ _T.'.: ... ..T 1 *v lo ©*.j i ^ id 8«Oa ni i. ■ ' ■ . • • ■ '» : L •' ru; <: <>tf \r u'npr n 'ti ©no aluptjti . . ■ ... ' fj'j ' aa.-f-: ■. . •. ' .. Li.4: •■'' . '! yo b ^ CO , Ho a*i' i J.6000 :i* "Xt«dq*n *v is©-; H3l -...i"-- ,^r.,,j0Cr jTi.'.OC 0(1 {.aiJ ij i, 1 o f 004 COCiCOwd *• . '4-*i»A I do* -. tv *'■') «■’..»■ .©. : 0 .-..It 5’ 4 CO 4 ^©I'w' u»d4 .'-c»«.>aj i| mO I •>\l£}CL Sttij . • .t 0 ^ ' -t'iQ.'d* IglL'Hl r.W’J c'. :. 1 > « 1 Oi 4 1 1 0 ©ll^ ; ' •*• -''■•■ - ■’. ’: V ■• .1 tt© b . .U .cV*. Mtii'.' T 'v'j . .1,0 at. ■ »! '’...' ir. r. to« a 1 Oft^C OTi . i i ^ GO. t»»t« ll J ly ■./•:©v Uidt ods-i'** oto .• .('riii'-' ocoDicO'^ 9a 4«w'ui. .£ tjti, * rio ,r>ii .. /itt ©rt.J’vio ‘'4uis;fr:;o~4Gi.i-tt;cr* o# . . ill- i ' A jT , •: i "„ . . . ; ■ js •:, . i ; C-' ftO.H-fttl , 'jt^ifyyc I'iso, f / ■: , a 60 But Mr. Hunt never entirely locjses sight of his underlying purpose in criticism. He set out to praise what was worthy of praise; and although he had no respect for error, however long it had been established, or for vanity however long endured; he was ever ready to admire dignity that was not pedantic, pathos that was not artificial, gesture that did not suggest machinery, ex- pression that was more than paint and lamplight; he looked for the laughter that had heart in it, charm that radiated sincerity, mod- esty that demanded respect, and vivacity that inspired wholesome hearty amusement. About such q^ualities as these he was eager to write with warmth and generosity. He pointed out the "mingling of heart with humour" that Mr. Bannister enacted; he paid tribute to the "virtue and respectability" that Miss Duncan possessed; he admired the "simple passion and mixed emotion of anger and tenderness, and testiness of good-hearted old age" that disting- uished Mr, Dowton; he indulged the "liveliness, social vivacity, and dry humor" assumed by Mr, Elliston; and he pays tribute to the "charming openness and gaity" of Mrs. Jordan, whose "voice pregnant with melody, delights the ear with a peculiar and exqui- site fulness, and with an emphasis that appears the result of per- fect conviction... Her laughter is the happiest and most natural on the stage;" ... it is ag natural as emotion itself, and "inter- mingles itself with her words, as fresh ideas afford her fresh merriment; she does not so much seem to indulge as she seems un- able to help it; it increases, it lessens with her fancy, and when you expect it no longer according to the usual habit of the stage, it sparkles fortn at little intervals, as recollection re- » «■% Tf;7^fi :^riv. 't' - H.j I -\ .c 'll uvt,.ai V. * ' i ^ '10 r«.'H itti’U ,1U 5ui t ; ■ . ; «■ .. ■. V j X. I . r '. . 0 q oi •tuo ^ t- c H . or » ; t t 4 1 -j c rl o» « c q if t/ tc , i» ■II-' "• I .’ ’J''' oaV fa. ‘.3 JXQtHtfX-: 1-imJ . . .! . J.I 4aXi7 - ■/-^ . V I -• ( if •- • 1 . ,• . • i) ■- lit . I ■’ < * r- V Q . <» d 7 ' >.iroxc. Ltj'fi ..’t ; i 4Aii4fY^««^ j* • ^ ■ •fa ' .^?*** c*5 ;• ar .--4 . •'A ? ^ i *■.','; r- A . 4 a PWO B if iT'.A \:3 fstli ■\ ti i i • I i )i\*' c . ; ‘iio hv*' . il u>;: f;;f« jda|K*}A4r »r.’4v. o41tW. • li?c #C ;?it: r.-» 14? • . " i«i4. ‘ C54i» 4i4.0b to ; t. •14!;'’-: oo I ifAOrt- : - . * .' j«rt# i ..: ,:i ;. !».•)>, 0*1'. cn.- tixJ-rl?-' #44 04 ''.us -iitpijii* l<.i c 1 ■, xsq •’ . ' b o 1 4 mJb* o4 i’ O' - -i'’ o a -* •• *#11 -fa'04^ ,1*' f. : V.: - 4 C6'» .>Um , to jiii o J -•■' '“ *.o • • iO'l>.£»4 y;. ;iro4v.,-'fJ ,*x;d \,iq fti o .i4< . ; :■ . ■»’ \ r I . . ■• S u..; V. . ;;iir , tf t> !'*iiili .u- , : - 4 1 ;ii. a u.aaouu 0H.3 -ii'ox !'..•*> » rf4X' 'i'#': ■ r c*is:t*fc»i: , \ lL.a-1 oar; /iiJtw 4«£Aa#*iq - 10 . • to JLtfct*. oriJ niMaqqM ^trr.J yJasti'-.r- . 1 . ii4it>,- 'bas , **4411 £f1r q4Jt* '' j I' s i' <1 Hi tcii/'tn 4 ir- o-.t.’ -• iso «d • • j 'r:.M”r-e;' i oV , . . * rto' 1 4 a JL va-? e 4'Dfat • fij -"<►411 tor- , t X f - 4 '»fra . I- . ^';o>|tjfi4a #il4 40 UEO-. -i.j f: 1 'I _: :-.v’:5l>l .. :i ^ abiofu 'V.us ■'. I >«4l Ati-anXm -« u Br i,’ .. •. ; s.t n^iobal 9 $ aic ' -i itr ^Jin o« f ja n<*ob ; 4 a itot- bc« ion n.iXw rs.-.tfc, iiif - J* . -o»#»icai 4i iJ: qlbdikf cvfd# i ’ t. .7'di!/'. !ajfi;o *-n4 o? >. lj L b *; c .. OA 'Ofl al 40wq*» col aont? ' '■•TO 'V 4, 4 OPi X c 001 . e X j! 'Ilf *? . 'U'; I e 4# I'UlCl'l OaiJtinqk Jf /■#^44# ' 'f' , m 61 vives it, like flame from the half smothered embers,” The temptation to quote further in illustration of Mr. Hunt’s felicity in the art of praising is not easily denied; although long passages of such hearty approval as this from which we have extracted a brief quotation, are few, not oecause Mr. Hunt found it difficult to praise, but because he saw so little worth prais- ing. One need only compare what he says of Mrs, Jordan with what he wrote about Mr. Pope to be convinced that he was more at home in approving than in condemning. Picking out what was beautiful to look upon, heartening to contemplate, fortifying to emulate was the was b ot'hv ocat i on and avocation to Leigh Hunt. As already ex- plained, he does not blame the actors alone. He thinks responsi- bility for correcting authors for representation rests with the managers of theatres. He laments the perpetual representation of wretched dramas whose genius rests entirely upon their immorality, oecause they are nurtful to the immediate reputation of the act- ors. He regrets that ne has been compelled to draw examples of good acting from iewM the worst dramas. But the hope that he may have been of service by assisting the improvement of his own age in play writing and acting has encouraged him to exercise his best powers, such as they are, against the barbarities of modern come- dy. ’’Succeeding ages very often acquire an unconscious tone from the most trifling exertions. Like the child who was awakened ev^> ry morning by his father’s flute, they rise in the calm possession of their powers, unconscious of the favorable impulse that has been given them." Modern dramatic criticism may not be conscious of the favorable impulse given it by Leigh Hunt, but the power and "T ■, r 7 th ia! ywgnai)aM^jfc.tj »j ® 7 -, H 31 ,, ,..._) * 0 ^ bsfimdtium^ “itsA BCt 4 ^ moil! GcMtll Q 3 (Xr »t«Zv • « ■■ ▼n.^M a>" ;:vX-il .71 ,ni If) iiu |)i4iii#AJuXXX xtX ftloxrp 64 ao . «ifT 4. lift. •A* JijfabxUlM tbBlittib xlitBB 3oR si snialatq lo 4*S4 niy,;C^XplX9l «v^0i1 fWitlV f|6tt Kiiii «« XaToiqqA %3ta,BA docra )o aa^iAaBaq gAoX t'. haoB'l iaUfi .*t)> ViarAO»« ioa .wtt ti« , ao i 441 ^ 0 «j) t*Xtd m bBioMi4f6 ' #i' ^-y,: -alanq dftoi' fXlliX d« t«irso»d fitc q3 4X ifoXtlX^ ‘4X l«iX« a«0ic'« .si2 lo i\ji* »4 Utfw oi4q«oo JCX9« t»#a imfX *aal JA •tcin B«v Bcf liidi bdajiiTaoa id dqOf •*!){ 4uod# aiqiv td o4 I»/tI*cr#Dc Mi« t«d« itfo TittiSoit .:sttiaffiBbtiob til aMsli salToiqq* at i' '*' “ '4 ■ '■ ££« •4«Xnc# 0 .^ %at%\ kttQ\ , • t«Xqr.t4aoo o4 siiXa»;}*x««d ,aoqo ^ooX ; > ■ :■' •%B el fiitqB itsidJE aoii«oOT« Ian fioX4lOO)rJlaftoqa'»i Bial/lf •!? .onoXl vnoJtM oAi bocaXcI lod fi«o6 CLd .It/tlAXq (in4 ilii« iie^t abijmkaBBBtqBt toT|»*iQxf40ft adtX^o»ttoo 4o\ xillld, " ... la DO Xitf4#qiof lai^oeTtjiX to ' • ' ' T- ' \tll rniBmmi 'tlfiik aoqu xtBtkfaB b) Btn . Buiaf% attotliif b^.'da'sJi £>04lo4ft*i» - ' '■ - to OLCt3BJttX»X t3“mkbBe*43i BAS 9i ItitSHMH »tl tB 0 »Old "'I . •*■ •'■. ti to «otq«Bxe 04 teIXtqooo a *»0 Bd iilf. Adi »H « BIO Tt X4UI #4 tuii oqofi odi itffl .tinil) OBToi Bdi, aox\ iaX4o« loPB OB& nvo aid to laaioavovf al odi ^alt BituM dOXTiaa lo aaad AViti • . 7 -.- 44 I ■■•''^ >' lead Bid aaioTexa oi miA lais'taooaa bau g«ti4oa aiia ^ailX'xv %aXq ai . J "''' '^v '•*•900 at»itox8 to Bolix^ad^ad tU4 \bAS ai> doirB .Biavoq • ■ ■ a ,iit . . 2; ■ . , • f 1 ■ )■' fionl Bttot BffoloeaQONGr fl«> •tisfoa aaito ««>Ba BallooeosrS"'^ «V> * V - !▼© BOV odv l)iido odi odXl rBaailnexa , taon »di ». ' . ' 'i* olacoBaoq mlao BdS at t>Blx XBdS aModlJl elM 1(4 BaXJS*som ;i»o4 Bsa sbAS oaXi/qtai. •ido'sefit ao^ to avoioedoouq tBiavoq xtBis to m l4 ao-oloBdOc ad ioa ^aen cn%lci3lxt,,^txljl BniBXp oiaiFOK ** *aaiil aovii u f. V , ,.,;,V- - . -r - ^ R baa i«waq odd 4 ^ 4 , « 4 doK*dBXe«l qlsil oavifu aaXaqati aCdAidYal add ' „ ■ ■'* -i - ■ '>%-'' '-I ■ ’ -ij ji' ' _ . 62 whatever sanity, independence, and sincerity it may possess was first fostered by him. A paragraph of self-appraisal from Hunt may help us in placing a right estimate upon his ability as a critic of matters theatrical. In speaking of the attacks that were made upon him for his criticisms, he says that they "...were little calculated to obtain their end with a youth who persuaded himself that he wrote for nothing but the public food; who mistook the impression that anybody with moderate talents can make with a newspaper, for the result of something peculiar- ly his own; and who had Just enough scholarship to despise the want of it in others." He does not pretend to think that the criticisms in the "News" had no merit, but believes that the "pains he took to round off a period with nothing in it, or to invent a simile that should appear offhand, would have done hon- our to better stuff." In speaking of the volume entitled "Crit- ical Essays on the Performers of the London Theatres", he says, "I have the book now before mes and if I thought it had a chance of survival I should regret and qualify a good deal of uninform- ed judgment in it respecting the art of acting, which, with much inconsistent recommendation to the contrary , it too often confounded with a literal, instead of a liberal imitation of nature • 1. "Autobiography," edited by his son, 1860. p. 143, 144. ' , ' . r' r &» X»i^ tfi79oai€ tnt» , ^x9la»9 i9V0SMaw ' .0iii ^4 b«iejAo't ittmlX '' . ' - ' . ' ■ % y _ H|i ^4 »» qS90 ?tr 2a&fi «• to i t *%9jfAit %o olflxo « an «|jl aoqa »}# 0 |;fBe s •galOMH^i Aid addi/ dft' >^dw 4«ii# *dj lo al 55 #4 1 ^#d# xXMi a^' r9»Bioi a iTto M 3V0X t 'diW'' bftd ilerii a t aldo^oi*** ft#4a I»oXdo dlJil'l . ' , ' -ft -■ ^boet oiS4Jtq e/iJ is;ti Ttcitiiea\ot 9toxV »4 4«4J#; tXda^ld b»M 0 «*x«qf « • ^ ' , , ,(») ^ 96i iMAt 0/ bfldlatq^ JOB 000 b dS ^'.aiacido o44 tarii d4^Ki4X«d .^lijrd oa |bad •*’ Bwd|t'*’^^,o4t ji/, I t,> ■ » ' I ;’f V '. ' . JP ■ ‘ ***!,*''' <■ ■' otf ne ,4f 4I boiioqi a tto bui/ot■ . - ■■:- ■ ^ -JtiO* btl^lio^ oOf 4 %tilda§ baa iaiaa'?;^j»l«o4^* ifXairlv^ i ■ * ' I ' . 't , ‘vX’ 9 '■ '•) dilw .doliitr Vi^Haa,, to ' iMta o49 fiai^oaquatt ‘"fr aoXto CO 4 r 4 1 1 *; ^q>rari^itoo .o>4jf ol ftoXta^ntm^ooiiif, 4af4.alaaooiil doan^fi ■ > V'' ^ ^ . ■' q ' ,w Vq {aaodiX «. to.baadaat •iato^il « 4tOiO bobitiiotaooj 1}). 'H 1 " S' -^•Ti ■ > • ,, ^ W'r * ' ■ >* iM'Vii* BSy.-./'i* v‘‘\ is 5m ^ 4 ^,,1, , • ^rd ■ ;. *4.. .441 , &4X adOX .doe^iil qd^oo^Xbd **»74«4^t»dldoJfcA**jiil ^ 63 VI INDICATOR AND TASTER Critical and aesthetic appreciation. Imag> ination and Fancy. Critical estimates. ’’What is Poetry”? --Details . and examples. '•Wit and Humour”. ”a jewel case of crit- icisms.” Character of the two hooks. The conclusion. "Who still rules our spirit from his urn. From dramatic to literary criticism was the natural and easy direction for the genius of Leigh Hunt to take. Everything that his mind occupied itself with, which was not literature in some form, had for him only such interest as inheres in stepping stones: useful to get from where one is to where one wants to go. All his life he had been an inclusive reader, and a discriminating one. He never failed as an intelligent appreciator of ^rhat was good in books, and especially in poetry. Of its imagination and fancy, its sweetness and its music, its tenderness and its grace, its wit and its humour, no better judge ever existed than Leigh Hunt, and no critic ever pointed them out with rarer skill. Among those who have given high rank to Leigh Hunt are not only his ardent admirers, but also his grudging critics. Lowell thinks that Hunt’s ”spbtlety of discrimination” and sound judgment "has hardly won fitting appreciation.” Macaulay, besides feeling a ’’kindness” for Hunt, credits him with the power of ’’justly appre- ciating and heartily enjoying good things of very different kinds.” ”A commentator on the minute beauties of poetry^” is Whipple’s es- IK J * • r

    iS$lli€%M bx» L»sUi'%0 . •trtACJla'n. .xec#-! La* aoi^Aiil . al JL#Ji^a^- Ai .#l0 ^‘.aatAioi i-lnlQS Tco ••Xtfi Xili* ^dtei’« 0 loiioo /..V ,Aiii aii 4 laotl r-v . «» . .. • ../m *M# »lty ««fr 0 alolXl*c& coif ^ . *■ ■ ‘ '»■!?■ J fcllfXtTavx tttuv AQiol 10 evXnot «|U a(iX|o*tX^ \e««f ni iQtt Aoliw ,d4tw ixetil O-oX^iacoo baits »IA ^atiS aAiqttJ* jst aa'iadal um laatoiixi dom* ^Xao oiiA A«ii »aTO% »«oa ^ . * r . , . '<■ ' * " 1 j .os Olf nt0»m matt oi aX tso otoifv moiI .JO) ox XjTiOAir ttfApfa ■" M. . . \i %aXXaoX»ltoalh « •vlta^Ioui aa b»a oA till aiit jX^ ’ '' « • ^ ' < , >r,*, ' js, •AV tOXAlOOl^q# fAA^i I i §Xnl AA «4 boXi«l "f•r •0 •*' ta« aoiXartlBABl «xX 10 .qaX»?oq »i x^jAlcoqao, bao »iiCood ol booi '■,'■'■• ' . ■ ■' 'P^-' *' ’ ^'■’:®r!r,, «o««r% axi |?AA ■oaa^abaai iiX *oXt 0 ai axit aoA tiaiilaaira aXi ' • ' ^ , ,>■ ■ '■ A9lo«Z balalA* tAr* »8&«t 'KoXXod TtvowirA all boA Uidf taiai axXa Xvo paAX tioXcXoq lat* oltxio oa $aa .IbaH Xoo tlA I.TAl tfilaj 01 ^AT BATiB fVAA ri( 4 « oaoAX ‘ — - - * • ^ ' 3 . . - * I IXovol' Bl 4 obIB XacT ^atATltaBA XBtbiA lilA \(Xb« ^ XfjNiBBbirt beooa tAa **iNuXAaXiiX>fotll> to qXoXxtfqa* a *X?u/B^ 4 ai1x^ VtBlAX i S' "iU — f B^X-X art aolllAAO «>(,Al 0 «OAB * «tiO i XAiOAtqqA BOVr ^XO^aA' aAA*' ff I ^ . ' • -'^• -anci^A qXXa«t'*’ 10 tABoq oAX BiiA «ia txibaKo j-JaiiH "lOt *>9B»abaiA*> a „ ;■ ‘ « ^ 4 ? ^**.Bt>Bi4 Pito-BAtliXf V*Ot tq IBBXAX bAOl BAiqottfO qX^SlAOB bttA bbHaIo^I ••■> a’oXqqidW ai ^^Yhi****^ 1 ® fivlXBAOd •XaAiai tiCX bo %pt0t^ causae a** UStlBb'^ 64 tlraate of him. Salntsbury grants that, in the faculty of literary criticism. Hunt is *'with all his drawbacks, on a level with Cole- ridge. with Lamb, and with Hazlitt. his defects as compared with them being in each case made up by compensatory or more than compen- satory merits." Winchester, commenting on Hunt's critical writings, deems "his contributions to literary theory by no means insignifi- cant." Undoubtedly Hunt had considerable power of analysis and def- inition. as well as ability to taste and to indicate what was good in literature. The best single example of this is. perhaps, the in- troductory essay to the volume aptly entitled "Imagination and Fan- cy." According to Winchester, this essay, entitled "What is Poetry? "is, on the whole, as satisfactory an answer to that question as any more recent writer has been able to give us. ..the essay is full of the most acute and discriminating remarks. His discussion of the value of musical sensibility in versa, of the difference between smoothness and sweetness, of the effect of variety in accent, of al- literation and assonance, his distinction between natural and pro- saic. — which very neatly punctures the fallacy in Wordsworth's fam- ous preface.-- these among other passages, may be cited as proof of the delicacy and Justice of his taste when dealing with general principles." Mr. Brimley Johnson states that Leigh Hunt's critical work, all that is directly so. is confined almost entirely to pre- faces. This statement, we presume, is true when the Judgment it pronounces got its direction from Mr, Johnson's "directly so." Our own preference, however, is for the two volumes entitled respective- ly, "Imagination and Fancy." and "Wit and Humour," "Imagination and Fancy" is first among the likeable things that Leigh Hunt has done in the way of criticism. The little volume XiM-m 1 1 lo xl£iF|b«:t pd: ml ^imd$ •#a«*i?|. ji;al«S ® *atjll( Iro. \ ‘ 'll J -#£fiO ii^iv X®V*I n at, ,uAos^y^mit> »tti i|# m 5 owB ,afioilXto] «* ,;il|taH ilJl^ 6aa «d««4 d^Xw Siiiii v'%C 0 itio^Asaaqiivo fd qir tbam «a«o itoa# ai ^gKldd m^dJ « ■* 4 aia]i 00 t^ifm^aaeo ,'%tJ§ 6 HoaTlff ** qt 9 i«a CfJt9 ^ly ^as«^oa >sftf f’lotf^A of •■ol^judl'x^apc •XU*' i(P» olitlaoa yo fmoq mtdsy^JbiBucc dMa jalS9-\it§4 duo bjMfJ toflf .«»w SMdw tfaoJftcX ox »aa oX«ii ox xXlXXd^ •• lioif ta ,aoixlai *1 • •ei .c.q«iJbjrl 9 fiib olu ^^ondaoM^M has aoXloiofXX -8ot • ’i(l‘io«o|itof 0I qoiXIot oivx ootofpovq qCiaoa cfol0»«»» oXoii i- ■ 31 ' to 10 ^‘tq «# fco^Xo od ton ,oo9«t.0A<) toaro 900IBO Oi«AX -«,0Q#t#iiq «iw ' . * i„ * - ' , Xot»8*| dilw ]|ifXXo «9 iro 4 *» oloo# «ld to oolXoat 2>a» tt#oiXt6 ddt ►•■'.- 'S . ' I r. I lAoXxi^o •‘^OOB dsidi i0it# aoxjjxo uooado; flaUi^ .%ii ** .aoXqXeaXtqi J M^oiq Of iXotidao fooaX4 liooitaoo fi .o« tXxoo!»XJb «x #iMBva( )D ^«; 9 0i>vlool ■ 1 ^' ^Alia«^fti0 **r^'-#0O^ «1 9 »A 1 *' 00 i(0ote am to idoioooo eoso^ ■••Hit to «iooo «o^l ■aoi^oieof to ••ivoe ■ wao»\ 9 tl% 9 S V ^ .t«ifl0Qa ^xl 99 tma i£#» t^if jbitow miis mmdw bamlytoM ' * - *■ . *■ ■■ ' t ■ 4 ^. »f- *' fiae •fr^i'toIoO ,aoSJlU ,cto«aot ■•« .OivoXtal^ . ■•, y , l•.oi.'i• lirli Jiotl ftoa Ji lot ,smAS tX II .\s;ioXcininj ximai’b'f.o tOiTMoa ti |i SmdS •Ijoo « oijil •• •tou smds otao* oas ml KiolcUI«« nm li fXoo tiue •? t: 4i iod tmSooq diiliaX iBOd *111 nott •idtfotXoA to floIlooX BVO tXM to fOiooXAal OBfoooO odfij •aiX ,iu«dl dii»4 ladX, ai otois ' i . 1 ■ ■,!,'. to mamom fd ham ••koXov tdi oi •■•ailotqa mks o*ro tiotod ^tSmoifieX .1 ■ >' # r! lO tioioq ,s6i ioloaoo mi moSoa %ssmtio bam , oaol tosrbovsai looXlito otd i SP »n»- .,• i, P to ds-^ap^sm •41 toix ,X••^aX .tloqt ^(«o«4 odl «B ol in# ■■ 1 -. ^ ' '* . '’ll * ■ ,, ;■•.■ Bj lOt- XXol 'aolto 001 ■oilX‘^Q .•olvi0« Xjolii^o a'lBiiy OxXoJtiJ I ,« . , ft — • » ''' •'* i " , M •toOBJcr itoo oAm utobmofl .ooiiootitB^ tiodi Otto Soa moot SmdS ooaoi i ■* 0 ‘k . ■* *■<*• . , ,1 Biodliu oaS OfSoSoxpbrtu ooSm boo (•(•ni to ibjai) aoill*io oBI bamSt loBBOo oliv aioOtt/f ^ .etiU ioodj tjOBltt tlodl qlr taCjoi Obo ,bm$ioiSito ‘ ,Joa4it*i«0ttB loBBJO , oiods VM boMSuiobao l‘ kjf i. ^ItXooq 4lio« bailiioa «tjit odo ttoKlBj' eili tVoti. «^jii4«4 td qo0 IX 66 alone? Instead of spending time decrying the worthless, give more attention to pointing the hesitating reader to the beauties of lit- erature. That, at least was Hunt*s belief; and he not only opened a way of enjoyment for the general reader, but he enriched litera- ture by the encouragement he gave contemporary writers. With a little encouragement our imagination and fancy can picture Leigh Hunt at his favorite fireside, talking with friends, two or three, perhaps more. How and then he picks up a volume from the table and reads. It is a favorite passage, from a favorite auth or, to be sure, and therefore fit subject for illuminating remarks. They will not always be in approval, but his general purpose is to praise; for he has chosen to read what he likes. So in this volume. It presents a sort of fireside reading and running comment. But mere ly to present passages of poetry particularly pleasing to Hunt, was not the primary object of the volume. Its purpose was more serious, more critical. One of the objects of the book, we are told in the Preface, was to show **what sort of poetry is to be considered as poetry of the most poetical kind, or such as exhibits the imagination and fancy in a state of predominance, undisputed by interests of anoth- er sort.'* And by a oareful perusal of the introductory essay, ’•What is Poetry?'* we learn that poetry and meter are not the same thing; and further, that poetry is something different from the metrical expression of even great thoughts. He insists that we may quote from Shakespeare, Milton, Byron, and other great poets, hun«> dreds of passages which are soul-stirring without being strictly poetical; that the passages in a poem most pregnant with mind and t 0^0* « <^i7l ,«t«Xilr50W *A$ •OFii 3oltia»0 t«fltJlI sftaelA -*5 ?}f B •fit )o *4/ or ifbAo*! •((> oj aol9coJd« lioiSO^O %in 0 ica I'ltoif.rd «*7nuH njkW ism^t fs .ontf^ato V r ^ ^ »f fan X«*to ««'9 oni voi rara^o^at to t I - < ^ ,aio^£r«i ^lAYOfBOtffioo ^^^^ JT ««a« 9 «tno cao oiU Ytfvoijbii ’ . i/ -.M MO xpm*\ bOM ttOifsal^Mml tiro laottoaATfooot ,r»Xff IX a lUiff ^ 4H« salstXatf ••lilBBtll •iX*iot#t «X4 l« laul diXo«X oyaxolil ^ ^ * i, . 16^1 $sati^r • qcr oatol^ #4 aofU bas «of .«yo« nqoxlioti to »«i ■?> » . *i . _- 4io* o^ifovol A «o‘f) oliyovoVii kt H .•boo'i ban tXdiMr • ’ ® f .«ytfiK»'l DolXAalfflfllXI lot stB^cfira Oil oiSToicKiil baa •aioa ud ot>,io 9 ‘ OX »l oood'ivfl Xaioaes tid rod ,Xavoiq(|a oi t'd oxaola Xoa Xliv ^ogT .eisalor bIKX tti id .«#3tXX on XMJiv boot o4 aoooilo »a:r . L*' ‘A. '■ ftX/«XiOQ *100 4«o oooqioq fttl .oaufXct'v abtf to \i«4tX*i4{ o44 4oa '■V;' I* I .Xaoixlyo oyo« ^5<»4 T .v*'lEbv «oo«ttt% oflX a I JbXex oia ov ,;«ood oa/ Yb •root<^o to oab w^, ,-r^ , ■ " to <^i4ooq 9'M boioblRaoo •• ox «i x^jboq to Jtoo ObjOy" trOtf« o# abb '■'■ til b«« aOiXaalsaai o44 eiidlox* «a 4ooo lo ,bal4 laoiXooq XtO0 f4l ■ -dxoea to oiooioxal qd btxoqoibaa ,ooa«aXAQboiq to oxara a aX >'i 4/1 tiox ocfboyool 0 /lx to Xat oioq Xutotao a %0 bab‘ ^ ii., ’id,. •aao «ax 4oa oia loxam baa xtiboij Xaox oiaoX ow *’Tqi 'oo$ iX 4a4V^ ddX 0011 XKaiottib taoa *i xiXaoq XaciX • io4Xtirt>'' baa jiaalxld # ' yae ann xailX tlaiiaX *E ^btdtooAi xaoil aart to aolaattqM Xaoi*i4a« . «uort •axaoq ^aoib itdJo baa' ,aoit^ «aoiliitf' •-ataoqiioaladd o4oub '■ .' V ■ 3l yXOoXiXa %ai«a /aoaXib''^ffiiiixa-loaft oia aolitw Dfgaaaaq to obaiJ *4^00 bain a7l« jcraniiit«M 0 *oq a al aoBaeaaq oiU dad# (faz^XXaoq] - '!r,» /■ ,. t 67 meaning, most agitating in its effects, and most decisive in its testimony to the genius of the author, may yet have less of the es- sence of poetry in it than many inferior passages. In answer to the question. What class of poetry is the high- est? Mr. Hunt says, "undoubtedly , the Bpio." Then, after mentioning Homer, Shakespeare, Dante, Milton, Chaucer, Spenser, Ariosto, he con t i nu e s : "...It is to be borne-in mind, however, that the first poet of an inferior class may be superior to followers in the train of a higher one, though the superiority is by no means to be tak- en for granted; otherwise Pope would be superior to Fletcher, and Butler to Pope, Imagination, teeming with action and char- acter, makes the greatest poets; feeling and thought the next; fancy (by itself) the next; with the last. Thought by itself makes no poet at all; for the mere conclusions of the under- standing can at best be only so many Intellectual matters of fact. Feeling, even destitute of conscious thought, stands a far better poetical chance; feeling being a sort of thought without the process of thinking, --a grasper of fhe truth with- out seeing it. And what is very remarkable, feeling seldom 1 makes the blunders that thought does." Writers may be conveniently referred to one of three class- es according as they make it their principal business to expound doctrines, to stimulate to action, or to do something which we can as yet only describe by saying that it is different from either. It is only poetry belonging to this, the third class, that Mr. Hunt 1. Imagination and Fancy, p. 55 til tfl tii ni ^««a ••ft* dxU to *••£ ttAd i^n t/C^ to talaftig »di oi %ao 0 liti«i iW YOitttfli tA«n Q« % -.•■■ ’ .* ■■*•■ . ,-i .'iqUoioIt &>! *TOli#qi/a •« (loon oqo5 o ibotiioan t&t «» <* ■ '■ ' ' ;r ■•!'?-',.> - • •.i«do *94» dolao* tii iw yoioHiai • 0 oxa«oi|^«I .tqol o4 Maa .. ^ X-: ;jftoa 004 Jd]|tr0o4 5tf0 soilOol joafoq laaioo’XB ocSf nar.tJua «*xqi6A u tlooai idt&aiiV . 9^1 #44 4 II 0 . |#j«a 041 nioall^ X^) X 004 \i •tatiko 041 to tooltoJoaoo ono« 4ild tot " ilio I*'l 60 q oA • ' " ••■.t to an«4io« laiUoaXIolol xao<" a* xlaa oa Jaod lo aAo %albuMla 0 . a atoaja . lAjioodl ,ouc loapoo . tc. olulliotli o«vo ,f)OiXott «i0#t 149001 ( 1 , to Itoo «.)| 0 l#d 9diX0*t< toooa<(4^i«0(locq *<4t •lUiir to toqootB 4-*,BolX0l4a to ' loooOiq Ml .loodiiir oOl>IOA-BOiX«ot , »Xd« 4 lta 00 'S tX Ip 4 A .41 BOiOOt 400 ^. ' ' , ' ' *' ■" ^**.ttoob Id^t'oAl lad# aioOoirXd tdl todaaSXj '■? • ^ “*■ .A-,: -aaaXo' •0‘i44 to otto 01 A*’tassion torn to tatters, or a prejudice well spoken. But jingling proverbs, full mouthed passions, and pet prejudices are not poetry. But coming back to "Imagination and Fancy" we find in it :^ssetss 93 I XMm 4 Oilt ^MtliaaSipD kld 4 oi ktsileilu^ 9 m^ ' A tflfo«.4 £lo« •«, , • Mflii4it#i<>.«, &ixi, #^*itf3(Bii 443 v3«oi3«o:i^ 4 « ttt 4 , 4 #U<^« 4*«4 ffl ib» 3 oxrj» on -sUlto Ptf njtol9ssi $%pAit ffitod iAolJUoq to «XU4 mu .ai V '* *“ ti»43a.'.ict^ ?-»a #loio«q OiXA •tOqqatOA 4ao‘ tolfjaii ,Oo«i;A«ib tt« .foatrtoi (I- rod BO 3o«tt# i^lllol to l!^lof4b''lfa^lA.ii«Tq»o -q# •Itfll ntod 9»pd3 ,«3fll43 AZialmi lo ••oao# bn* •aidv ttOfrtfd oi «l JX •‘ivta^Xq •aoifv aOiioq «iitf not Xaoqi ' T ,• f 1 ^ ■ -qat rtoidir ,fXq^«4AH tot tnntdlbt^ .Blau a»0 tid tox pp pi bolnxc boo 1 ' ‘iT ‘ -3«0(J boiloo »4 JOB bleow .•coiJiJpfff^lo ^ieelq (ballqqoa to), iOilq Il 4 0 »«CIA<^ * dOi^C .fXeOpTjOA 3 « 0 A 0 Bt*i 4 «#1 \f ■ " V^r< 3 f ' ■ 'r-y‘i r -4 hao atolq a»aitfoot XXa «« 4 (»ai JAdl* * A •» .tAtX'A olpoot ir*t^HVO 0 V 3 i 4 i 0 di^. . f ,. I ■ '..•ElT . 0tOt«tt( , 4PT3 bototq ooa itoi/im im09 Ajra , IktOlB b^tJtaOll OrAff .iB.iiJMS oalAl »V0^1 ^ '-’■«■ ■■‘■ tJoiaJTOO 4itd ,ao»4^;t baa ©AVAt rtawi t^k ,4^bon« i. jfc Ji*T«di«c •ooX^©t 3B#«0d©v #iu OTA* n«4tftfl©j{ ;^r»4qqa l40i34oq on Add '' '' L * ■ ; . to mapifoaimlux .ti3 ,«tiAl to - oXUillO to ■ • . *■ * ',# ^Ir - ^,1 to lollixjqoeolldt odf ,n*sul ao 4 #At 4 ctPn«» 4 ?Ait i«d 3 ott«A 3 04 kbua £lM ol « I -' * «i‘ f ' P . * •» i ^ -. - i -•JotA fd 3 Ztltfl Li« 0 Z 3 ©oq xiituq /dt o 3 i© 43 p iijn.Zd^Jwwoi ©3 Ol ' ' ”Vj ■” aoldno^ 0 * 04^3 ** 0 '*t*Aoi^ tooX” #43 to dioroaq « §i oditAir aoiet©q’^ii,jlA »ttd*t©totq ^Mrif i Xf ( 1 1 1 3 uH .nodloqt Xiow «olZ>u(,«ta# aalooo zaa fj t ... *% 69 what Mr. Hunt calls '’poetry in Its element, like essence distilled, as different from that which we call poetry in its compound state, that is, poetry which appeals to a variety of emotional and intel- lectual attributes.*’ Examples of ’’poetry in its element, like es- sence distilled” are, according’ to Mr. Hunt, ”It ceased; yet still the sails made on A pleasant noise till noon-- A noise like 'a hidden brook In the leafy month of June, That to the sleeping woods all night Singeth a quiet tune.” The happiest instance he finds of the great importance that imagi- nation in all its phases is in the highest poetic faculty is the passage in which Shakespeare describes the moonlight "sleeping” on the bank. ”How sweet the moonlight sleeps upon this bank; Here will we sit, and let the sounds of music Creep into our ears; soft stillness, and the night. Become the touches of sweet harmony. ... LOok, how the floor of heaven Is thick inlaid with patines of bright gold; Some idea of Hunt’s conception of poetry has already been given; but it may not be amiss to quote his definition. "Poetry,” he says, "strictly and artistically so called, that is to say, con- sidered not merely as poetic feeling, which is more or less shared by all the world, but as the operation of that feeling, such as we see in the poet’s book, is the utterance of a passion for truth. «J(ii ,'i>n«crele., (i7l kXiiio iatiB '« i w _ P, Tuv »>X xr«d <»« itklk^ mo'%\ a« ii. •t^iai tff# X0HOit<>s* vi'yt) * o) «X»*<|'%oooM ,0’ia *'l>*II ii atjb •cffti „, La r.1 ti HO oMais afXio oitJ XXiiTi, Xt»x ji<* ;/, i --aoott XXXi fiaipa^ ^a0«i«<»lq A ■!",U '* ^ ^oo*id a^odlX ttloa A jgp a Voci^t 'to d^flcrm x^*oX 9,£iJ ttl _4», . '' tLa •toow i^aiq^Aola 0^ 7«il7 >'^' *'.0Bti^ ah Lop « iil^oi^qli -iaaai iadi aOHA<}^oqni ;»aei3 ed?‘1:o aXinXl od ooaA^oiJX ::F«fXqqAd' »4t • u . '■ ^ ’■ ' ■ i odi ol xtIbC'a) olitoq ;»*dAijcr atl9 ffL uL ttaatiq »9t S£jn ai ttolkao « 1. V a ■ ■ 'ho *';ija2q0oXft" ’VdifXXaouv ada ««dX*so«»X» aiaoqaslCAda (fC/Adv '«X ' 1'.* .. . i - I - • '■■ J ' Sff • jUultf^edX ‘4. :A4iad old? ffoqn aqoola tfd;aXXaooa od-T,^ ir«i«vii« 'woH**' o^tort to kAooot od? foX ooa ,Oii o#'XXiw otfH 4, / ' ..3a 51, . r ,44aXo add ba/f ,%9aolLLia Sion iw^aa tiro b^ucl qootO I' • , • T ^X^oirtod Xao^o to oOiiooo} ftd;t 0(foor>8 'I®-' ■‘*?A‘ «i 'T' fttvaod to tool! trod ■• . ..■■'■ ,5. ■ ' , .■,: iblopfid%itti to aottl^aq dHw blalai tbkdi nX ■ ' ^ . .A./ ^:ws3 .'.iH* w't. i, i ■ , . ." ■•■<.< v.„ ■ .. oood xX>o0iXa bai( xnlooq to coiJ^ooidOo tq »«IiX'' 0 I(tO 8 - »v.tJooH** .oe 1 tiffXtob ild, akaup ki ^a^aLiBM oil ^oa ,q«iin''^X #ocf $a»v, . ' " * * ' - ' s§. ^ ,, ffl '" — -BOO ^XMP' Oi oX -jiadi' vdotlAo oo xXXaoX ioi^f tA '^dao vltoX'iXo'^ , * 0 ^* ddl '- ' ; . “ o'-|iit ■* * "'9'w “ ftttAa tt«I 10 oiofl. ■! Heiiljr «• tXaioa loa AoioftX* ' ;a * ■' ' ' t ow 00 rtoirii ,ioiXO»»t dad; to aoX;Atofi,'^'ad^'*'aLi ooo * .«.' . D. .-ii' B)-'''- ' .«■ , xt =tt=: 1.15*: 70 beauty, and power, embodying and illustrating its conceptions by imagination and fancy, and modulating its language on the prin> ciple of variety in uniformity. Its means are whatever the uni- verse contains; and its ends, pleasure and exaltation.” Life, it seems, is a process of forging conventions; and it is poetry, according to Hunt, that keeps us from becoming en- tirely imprisoned in their soporiferous compacts. Like love and beauty, poetry touches nature’s clouds to glory for us. A proper interpretation, both of his definition and the selections in the volume, will discover the fact that the entire collection is an illustration of the definition, and that exaltation and pleasure will help us to ”go softly” between, among, and by the conventions that hedge us in from nature. A lover of Spenser always, it is quite natural that Hunt should select him as the first exponent of his definition. ... "Spenser * s great characteristic is poetic luxury.” Hunt thinks that ”If you go to him for a story, you will be disappointed; if for style, classical or concise, the point against him is conceded; if for pathos, you must weep for personages half-real and too beautiful; if for mirth, you must laugh out of good breeding, and because it pleaseth the great, sequestered man to be facetious. But if you love poetry well enough to enjoy it for its own sake, lot no evil reports of his "allegory” deter you from his acquaintance, for great will be your loss. His allegory itself is but one part allegory, and nine parts beauty and enjoyment; sometimes an excess of flesh and blood. His forced rhymes, and his sentences written to fill up, which 90 C U^ 90 txoo 9 i]o «;X ftcA ;aaX 0 Xaoo tf*i«T « ' ^ ^ ' -i a ■ , ' l>Aif tau^XJtsava^ BHiB'io't to aaaeo'i^ a ax « aaaaa XI ,olil ^ •aa BoXxsooao nonl aa aq^«o 3 ( lacix .xasdl B^X^yoooa .XTXaoq al XX ■'■' ' 'if.'’ avol aiX«l .aXoaqaoo aaoiatX'ioqoa ii*{lX al ^airoaliqaX \ItiXx leqoiq 4 .a« irot oX ataoX u ''«tax«a ••xtogoi .^aXaeq 9 dS at aaolXo^ita » 4 X tab aoXXiaX)et> aXo to .aipa , a 9 XXaX«tqitXnX p ., ^’ ■ & na al aoiiaalloo aiXXaa X« 4 X! I 04 I -axiX *i 9 XoaaX 4 XXlfrj « aaialQ v •laaaaiq 4 n« AoXXaXi^AJi# xadx 4 aa •QoXXXcl'ti 4 #iiX )o aoX XaiXivlXI ■ l*= aaoXiaavoac adx tx bam t%aomm .^aawtfad "^XxtPa ox «« qi»4 iix* >' ' ' ^ 1 ' ■' ’» - « C'< ' ■ ^ V n' ... 'ii 9i.. Si ipa«»#q8 lo Torei 4 .•’to^aa nov^ oi a« ^ , ij' ,V v'( *’ 10 Xnoaoq?;# Xa*rXt a4X •« «I4 lofXao 4Xao^«, xaaH Xa4i XaitaXaix axlaj^ I # < « ** I .aoXXlaXlal^ 14 ".fCiiiitfX oixtoq b 2 oXialiaXoataiio Xaotb a ' toaaaqB*' . # * • ■ , - • -^ f . , ‘ . tXlm vox ,x* ' , ? ,1 t, adX .aaloapo to Xaol^taXo «aXtxa tol tl } toJaXoq^afXB oX^i (, f latfff croq .aodfaq tOt IX }X>tOoouoo aX^taX/l iaisiaia iaioq / f It Si' ..ft'# VT, tol IX tXa'tixoaaO oox^X>aa Xaat«lXa 4 aaB«AP«io <2 qaav tj , n il sauaoaX bam .aoXOaato ooog^ I 9 xao dga^iX Xaa« xrox • 4 JiXn Xoa .aaollaoal §ii 01 a«a bataXaaoj^aa »ia*ta 0 ^ 4 XaaaaXq ' ••• ' ’ '■ > ■■* ^9 Jf . aiCaa a«ro aXl to> it oX A-^aoam llgn qtXaoq fvaX^oofC Bid Motl trot loxot ** t'^PBoXX^** aX 4 lo aJtoqat iXta oa X«X^ • V , * .#.#■' ‘ XioaaXXa alE ,aaoX tsot XXXv laatB tot , apaaiaiatf^OJi '»r t ^ • A , % ^ •■ J' JJ • U M'__: tfla aXtaq aaio baa Xta ‘4 axto X »4 aX^tlaaxi olH .OooXd t|«a'' 4 a#Xt to iiiifoxt aa auslxomov (Xc» 0 ta|ioo 4 t>l 4 « ,qi 7 IXIt Of aaxxltv otoaadaoo 0 X 4 Oaa •BaAvrlt Aaotol ,, r a 71 in a lass poet would be Intolerable, are oompared with suoh endless grace and dreaming pleasure, fit to ’make heaven drowsy with the harmony.*'* Spenser is more **southern than the south itself’*; he is constantly '*haunted with the sense of beauty,'* and all his versi- fication is '*perpetual music.'* Critics born of the earth may not find his poetry to fit their rules, also born of earth; but poets themselves have idolized and imitated him more than any other poet has has ever been idolized and imitated; and all '*the gods are ravished with delight** by his celestial song, and the wondrous might of his music. In the selections that follow the critical remarks, Hunt first points out the exquisite modulation, the noble senti- ment, and the tone quality of *• Archimago* s Hermitage.'* Next he shows us in the '*8ave of Mammon'* what Hazli^tt has called the "por- tentous massiveness of the forms, the splendid chiaro-scuro and shadowy horror." Then we are brought to a '*Galery of Pictures from Spenser," which Hunt considers, and concludes thereby that Spenser is the poet of painters, and also the painter-poet. To each of the pictures in thes '*Spenser-Callsry '* Mr. Hunt has at- tached the name of the painters whose genius the poem reminds him of. There are nineteen such pictures; but only two of them are here quoted. The first one, entitled "Hope," is, according to Hunt, such a picture as Corregio might have painted. It has, so he says, sweetness, but is without devotion. With him went Hope, in rank, a handsome maid. Of cheerful look, and lovely to behold; 4*ilf ,9idmt9tC7al *tf btuow^’tuQq ittvX ik aX ff . ■■• 5 - ' 1 (.'7 #11 faJflr«»ib bu« *a#Xta« 1 ' t . '''■/- B ** * ,\ao 3 nnA ddJ Aiim adrm^tl »#Uiil' «1 »a d7eOM 9di tisdi arpeUagu^ 9ioac ■! Tvanbqe «• ■ ji .ititT ftlit XCa £a^ **.t;7.o«»d 19 ••a9t.«d# 47 1« lio9iii/«ii* tUftAitaoo ■ foil %Ma itfia* 9dt iQ :iiod •oiJlvO " ".ol^uu Xif^feqioq^ mI aoifaeil Ji/ii tdf^Mp 10 Btod osla /•♦lui il»49 ;11 tJ'^Hippq i 14 bait •mdfo dsdJ arom mid btfolliel jbaM botflobl oToif ■•¥l»««oii# I 9*ts Bltos tili#*' Ha JbOA {bolAlloi bfiA “bosllobl nooo t«vo gpd aa4 t#0*xbA0» Alii boA ,s^oa IaITioXao Al4^Xt< **}j(3|l£ob ditm bpdaitMJ V -olAiie «14 'to ,b3^ ♦•jtiAAfl Coolfino »d# woXIol 7A4i •aoifool'st #4# al , .*., ^ wflES. V . ^X#ae« eXdoa oHi «'Sol#Alabo« tJlo'lxrpAO tUf 7up ifnloq ftill oa fSd$m - \ •lOQ** 9t7 bOXlAO iAd SiliPM^ 1 A41V **ACIBf>Alf lo AVoO** <>4# oliAO ObOllO ■ )¥ *■ bnA o’taAA.ciAtdc HtUaalqd #di , aa^oI a 4# to AtAoerlaiAM AOOfaA# . f ^ •'^ • AVdfOit lo XIAXaO** a a# All OW OAAf •'.lOtlOli X«bl>A4A ■ * , >*■ il- * ' ^ iMdJ x^9tadS AAbAlciroo bftA raitab^itacu dauff sidlda *«'t#AaAq8 aotl ' '4. p •T .1 Aoq.'ttlalAii 0d7 ooIa boo ,Atofai.Af lo ftoq Al tto.AAAqP ! ' ‘ -. ' . .', ii; -7A «a4 SatHk ’'tlonA^-^OAAAqG^' AbA7 ol AA%ilfoXq Ad# lo dOAO ■» , ^ ' " ''' D W- kid. ptalttPT maoq *4# AolftA^b eto^iv AtoiaiAq on# to aaaa td# bodpAf eiA mod# lo oA-1 Xloo fvd f •ansfi 0 Iq doot aoAfoaXa aia «V94T «1o 0 # ^sibioooA ,a 1 **,6qoH'* boXflfOA »oao’'#Aiil odT .bAfoap Ai#il OA , tAd #1 .bolalAq AVAd idylB oIsa^jiioo aa Axofolq a dovt »fatrB *"* .aoXfovtb laodfXw »l ,3AA0fAA«A t axaa ad jlii, " • .j:-' ,blAA AOOAbaAd.A ,daAi al \^pqpK $a§f »lA dilH ibXod^o Of xlo^ol bOA gdooX^ XoltAAdo 10 72 In silken samite she was light arrayed. And her fair locks were woven up in gold. She alway smiled;>'>and in her hand did hold An holy-water sprinkle dipp*d in dew. With which she sprinkled favors manifold On whom she list, and did great liking shew; Great liking unto many, but true love to few. Of the verse "And her fair locks, etc.** Hunt says, ’•What a love- ly line is that; and with a beauty how simple and sweet is the sentiment portrayed in the next three words, --’She always smiled!" Almost every line, however, is lovely to Hunt, and especially so is the felicitous Catholic image of the Holy-water sprinkle dipp*d with dew. If Corregio isn’t in every color and expression of the whole pict-* ure , then Hunt does not know where to find it. Here is the second selection, entitled A PLUMB OF FEATHERS AND AN ALMOND TREE Upon the top of all this lovely crest A bunch of hairs discolour’d diversly. With sprinkl’d pearl and gold full richly dress’d. Did shake and seem to dance for jolity. Like to an almond tree, ymounted high. On top of green Selinis all alone. With blossoms brave dedecked daintily. Whose tender locks do tremble every one. At every little breath that under heaven is blown. •dig 0$ ' a^'il i ai iin ,i >£09 ui qb ft«voi« o*r«»w^«XooX 7$fl d:tX *p - Ulod ttA b^Btt X0A ai tcIXffa ^Mwts i^tC '“ ^ ;., '. ■»■: ■ ‘ * 'rt J i f u *jrf\ ai ,«9^ 0l b*qgiX •XXai'iqa hi ■ » - .1 ' 1 V .•'*’ .'iv :i: liioTjit i^9£X«i*rqa e4« 49(4.« 4;#lt y* .. 'x (I . • _ ' ‘ - ;wq4a laoia tit >n4 modw aO ■jfi .w«i 07 oToI offii io4 ,%aMa otpu atttXll 9«o*i£) m'.; .' " ’':f ' ^ -<'■ ■ ^fl?0 1^ 10 i*»fol A tM&it*' •*!«• iat/M *'.o49 «ftXooX %t«l %oA tot** "V . • ' '■' ‘ik '^) V ,, u ^ ' ' ■ i '.it od4 «i Iffva tao olq^io mod ^^>;«o<5 f dJiv '^OA^lisdS al mdil ql ll^Umo a\4Wlo odC: * a&iow iiovdi ixoji o4i al Sadmlittoo OA tiXaieoqiv ta.a ,4auB ci «X «to90iro4 ,9aii xidmp io^tslk K o^aafi oiXoxtiaO, airo^loiXol; tiUf ai k- 4* }■ ■ ■■ Wr r«at d^Xa t *qqil>')#X3l4;X*(qa ^olav-qiaB ffl. 0iotim odl \q nolaao'xqjr* tjt* ^o(oo *qtfT« ili X*a«l o taaiiQ/P V ‘ f i % .A—- .11 liCit ox fiadfi ivoaX, 4 40 aaot laaH a*4X • r-''*Tb''' ■ •''^-•* • '^4 ■' . o ‘ • * tolil 109 "Vocl’^XbAXaa taooaa kdi ■! anoB SBBT aiOKJt BA <44 'lO'BKVJS A otu ' laato xXb^oI tXdi XIa lu' qol #44 itoqO* . . ‘ ' »ll4t4tli» t •'lireXflOallr aiian to Aoaaif 4 “K.« ^ %ldoi^ XX«t iX^i td« Xiaaq 'H VXiaHqi dXlW; : '-'' ~ n ;*44iiot to) ooaat 04 a«#a taJf oBada tXB '-’ .. - ' " ’ -t 'S’ ■' '• <'' •' ■* .daid boyatromx « oonX ' taottXa aa 04 a414 t ‘ ' 'A .aaoXa Xta aaotfi )o‘ qo4 aO ' ./ ' ,._^ •tiX’diat tadoeteff oratd anoaaoXd d4iV . '■ . ' ' ^ *4' li '*#(to ti#99 a£d«#a4 00 adooX t'ata#!'^ aadjXl ^ " '•• ^ ^ .aaoXo at ffaTaad taOda 4ad4 diaatd eXilIX y;Y#t# lA :-‘5 ./(^l 73 "What an exquisite last linel exclaims Hunt. But he finds fault with the poem as a whole, and says it is not a description fit for a picture. The accessories needed for a good picture are not here; t and the reference to the image illustrated is not good or true. There is a feeling of too much minuteness and closeness in the very distance. Besides it is quite impossible to paint the tender locks "every one," and the whisper of "every little breath." These two, one a good the other a poor example of what Hunt calls painted poems, have been quoted to illustrate Hunt’s criti- cism, and to show wherein he distinguishes between what he calls good and not good portrait poetry. It would be diverting, at least to quote others, but the two must suffice; enough these two, we be- lieve, to prove that the book is not a vague panegyric or second- hand rapture, but an intelligent, discriminating comment on good literature. He not only relishes a beautiful poem, but he explains the mystery of its mechanism, the witchery of its peculiar harmon- ies, and the intense force of words when used in certain combi- nations, and properly understood by the reader. That kind of crit- ical service, we think, is much more effective than the coldly im- personal pronouncements of the intellectuals. The rule of the an- cients as such, does not much concern, certainly does not interest the people who should be led to reading poetry. Hunt’s is the "shaping intellect"; his is the magic index-hand that points down the highway of Time, a thousand years back, that touches our lips with laughter, and sometimes compels us to tears. Saoh set of selections from Spenser, Marlowe, Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher, Middleton, Decker and Webster, mf ittd .9a 9H terlAiox* JltaH odiiiaes* aa ^A4f** *^cl 5X1 Hci XQitot*!? i| Soix «X/] l>a« \o£pilw M $m a»oq Ai lyi^ \ ;*«#0 xo.a fsa a lol baftaoa ••Xioaisooa •at ••to^olq • .•015^^0 I>PQ:i$ 9pa bI b«44*U.f , ■ • ‘ w ^ lo ta^qaldir Pam *»aao i ' “ ' ;. ■ -. . N ' - i 5u«!? sadm lo •XqcnASA :iooq a tadSo adS jbooa ji *ao ,ov5 •••At ^ -k > ' ' ^IStte • ' JiXtrB -^5ai5 aErl Xi oi otJoop ff#»d •••d ^taraoq J>«7ttX«q ^ iXX«o ' U V , r- -i >ii' aXlAO ad SadBi aaam3t>4 bbAbI v^cttwlb ^aduslBABAw woda oS /baar ,m$tc SBmBi SM « 9 aXit»Alb ed biuoa il .%iiSBO% xiAiltoq I 1009 son bam 1 »oob » , . . 'i 1»' >•0 BP ,owS bbbAS dU'tfPA* iBol\\uB Sbo» o«5 bAs S vd , tiAddo •Xoffp Qi ' * -V, ' -.Aapoaa to oittBPAaq: ao^mf a ^aa ai d 9 od mds smds oToaq as «av»XX . ■* q 'C l»ooB dO SaBmMkQA %altmalaltoBlt ^iaogXXXbdaX na 9ua «*iAXqAi baad - " + ■ xoIaXqa* bA Sad ,mooq XolXdtrAod • a«4aiX«t qXao Sqa bH ••todAtpdil #1' ^•ao^BtAd ‘KAXXoofq aXX lo i^tAdodXv odd ,9tBlBmdoBm idi lo Ytodata^odd *■ • )i -Xdaoa atMJjBO at bBBts Aqdir adtow lo ootol oaoBSaJ odd baa «••! pidXto lo J^oid ##dT «t«5Ant mds xd bboiaiobau ^Xtoqotq bam ^ , Bdtf i saa . SePtBSat soa BBOb x^R-tA^'iao ,0100000 dai;* sba aw 6 l> ,dooa am adoalo ^ ■ • * • If < > , odd aX a'daiBtfll «xi^Pdq BflXiio*! od td oiooda odw aXqoaq^tdd awAb adoXoq dadj) JCtrod^motoX oX:»0a add ai aXd ^/^dooXIodaX Ba^<|Ada** a^iX tad^aododod 5 odd aioax bamBatds a„ ,«aiT lo XAvd^id add .otAOd od Btt olaqvoa aaoldaaqa lioa ,iaddBOAX ddiv . ^ -a' ■ ■ , , Ota oq a ad an 2 , aaroXva!! « taaoaqd iuotl^^ano XdoaX aa lo daa aoaS .tadadaf baa taaCoAO^ ,0OdfJbt)iLV ,tadodaXX bos doonoAdt «adaoot. aatt 74 Milton, Coleridge, Shelley, and Keats is prefaced by a short crit- ical notice. In the selections which he quotes. Hunt has indicat- ed his preference of particular lines or passages by italics. The reason for italicising (a device much deplored by certain critics, and designated by them as "signpost** criticism). Hunt informs us, was a desire on his part to meet the wishes of those who desired the italics. Hunt himself, "begs to be considered as having marked the passages in no spirit of dictation to anyone." Most of all, we imagine, not to the critics. That, we think, would not be showing due respect for their individual opinions. For the wandering, half lost layman nn the highroad of poetry, signposts do not come amiss; they may not lead to the four-square City of Appreciation, but they lead to the outposts of Understanding at least. The whole book is a sincere effort to have his readers see, as he sees, that everything which is deemed most justly human, as Hope, Love, and Reverence, can best be understood through the poet- ic strains of "the dead but sceptered soverigns, who still rule our spirits from their urns." "Wit and Humour," the companion volume to "Imagination and Fancy," exhibits as much care in the choice, and contains almost as good a collection of extracts, as the volume we have just dis- cussed. In "Wit and Humour," as in "Imagination and Fancy," his sympathies, vivid and easily won, were, nevertheless, held in check balanced and directed by his impartial judgment. The contents of these two volumes are precisely what suggested to Charles Lamb the word "Indicator" as fit title for Leigh Hunt, The selections in "Wit and Humour," with their prefatory notices of each poet in- ■ V [p to 4S0M *• •ottoxoM oi aetiMioib to ou aX Bn%oo%Mq taum !T ft ., - ■ '• * I -tine A booBtoiq «l ttceir bus «o^jbinoX00 *aotXiB -SMoUtti B*A taz/R oo xloi{i t *aX .eeiJoa X«eX .eoilAil ^d^aofAacaq to totfll tAlaolStMx lo eoaonelft^ iiiT b# • tolfint'aXaJnao btmoXqob doujtf ooineb a) ao avobooT aid btaA oi Jnotti otoealc a al iddt ^^aaaa o4 a« . ^ ^ c -dtoq bA$ jfBL’dirdt bootink^bdd ad Yaad aap ,ao 0 ai#raB ba« .arol «aq,oB ► * U'if tXcrn Xlile'udv .ao^^inaYoo bonatqaoa tod boob axl^^ to a.oidnia ol :'J ' * ♦‘.afl'fo nXarfJ oont a^ltXqa too Odd aolldalBdffX*' oj abolor aolxMqmoo «iil ",niroMiiB ba« tlW** ^ ■', laomld aoldittoo baa «tuloda adt ol onao doombuo doado al bled , aaaX edtnavaa , ana* •oev i(XIaaa baa blair •afXdtaqptb '' ' »'->4B to aaaatdoo ad? .daaaaba^ Idiliaqsl did baaeailb has baoaaXad-^ *' ''^ ‘ i 'fi adt dieaJ aaXnadO ot baiaasaoa iad« tlaaloanq aita aaaoiot oat aaadd ■ ^ iW .1 if ’ ' ' (>'. i* •*»«•- 1 al aaolJoalaa adt • not alt It tit aa "totaolbaX** bioa -fiJ. taoq doaa to baolton ^notatanq nladt litiw **’^noojod8 baa tlW** ika 76 eluded, their critical, explanatory notes, and their italics indi- cating Hunt^s favorite lines, appeal to us exactly as if Hunt him- self should take from his shelves the works of the authors repre- sented, and read to us the passages he has marked, emphasizing with voice and gesture what he liked best, and interpreting the whole with brief, graceful, illuminating comments, Reading his marked books we can, if we will, get a double pleasure: we may laugh with him or at him. In most cases, however, our attitude will be like his was. There will be a grim satisfaction at the biting irony and acute wit of Swift and Sutler; the macaronic nonsense of Drum- mond will be a common enjoyment; both of us will accept the lib- eral-thinking joviality of Chaucer, condone the wilful and super- abundant folly, "humoured to the top of its bent" of Beaumont and Fletcner, be vivacious with Suckling’s dairy maid compliments, run riot with Marvel’s extravagance, ward off low spirits with the wit, reflection, and good sense of Green, let the amiableness and "bon- homie" of Goldsmith lead us to comedy running into farcei and at the end of the volume be mirthful with Wolcot’s occasional mock- heroic inversions. And here it may not come amiss to call attention once more to Leigh Hunt’s critical method. In speaking of Wolcot’s mock- heroic inversions. Hunt says, "To compare great things with small, and show that I commend nothing strongly which has not had a strong effect on myself, I can say, that Lear does not more surely move me to tears, or Spenser charm me, than I am thrown into fits of laughter when I hear these rhyming (mock-heroic inversions) *John- sonia.’ I can hardly, now at this moment, while writing about them, and glancing at the copy which lies before me, help laughing «oiX«9^ i)0« ^np3 90 tbAbalo •talfi iuuTL «« %l)9§xb 00 09 X«oqqo' •■o0i£ oii^ora^ %*3auU ^al9«o • 9TC/Utio aA 3 10 Otfiow tUi 0»rXofla ooior g 's/ bPhiam uLii ikSlbbbJl .«9ao»»oo )»oli00 ItjmXI i •I0I00A19 09 !v d^tfl xam tw loioioolq oXOyob a 9«n^ »XXX«''«v\li ,000 e«’-i3tpccl~ O0H •« Uiv 0Jbo9i99o rt0o>. fio««o 90041 nl I0, to mlii %IM>li Oi(9 9 a 0oIiOAl0i9A« (ritl^.A Otf. iXiw OtoflT *o|iJ^Aili ... , ■• .- > •''' .•sons to .00000000 OlOOlAQAID 04^9 I toX9^ fin# 9'ti#8 to 9io oioon tmo i> i ^ >oii OAi jqoooA £ii« 00 lo 4lo^ .r^aom^otoo ooaiboo Oi od ii9o bcroA . 1' '■ -toqoA 000 lulXX* ox$9 §nolficc , nvoffjuto. lo tiX XolfOt 9ala(a.lxil*XAto • _ . ••' . 'r . " ’bads r aot ,o90tmiXqaOO bisn %tiMb o^iolljCouft 6 ilw $uOl os^lir od ^toaodoX*^ I ' ■■'- «9io Oiil9 49i0 tlitiqo mol llo 0 *xa« , 000090 Vot9» • o'lOltOI 4l9iw loXt • IT. - ' " n. , * i»t>O0t ^00 otmaoldsiBiA mat 9tl *aoftO tq ooa.00 0 ooa^X> 00 •ooiopoilot ■' • -'’ '• 1, 9 a 000 ;ft{>t0l oioi tOtuAOi t^oaoo 09 «0 .i>AOX ll9 oO lo **0l»0A i ., •9(oOf* |0Ht’)lej»oc B^mMj0 Ab-idv •'i0Jf0t99lX iQ "*i#9b« 9*' oXd«*f #49 Javfl ■J 1 ' UwJ «A « ,”»0ocibU t>a« 0i aivd bcA^ , mid, if tlaoi xX»*»t OKI Xl« iUfa .9«od «Xd ia ixa»o tsxl JaifB ,iX AdXXdo qaiVlcai r?i ;/ oieatT-oo ."Ml lo \^aa>t »xiao atom'tixb oitJuiI »aa*« 0^ ^ ft*;**' ; 'V ■ ' *dl «X litfXioa tiJipw ^XIatoaBa u <#■ ■ food? afoda daa^ .••X«'iio t*^Xal aujft'iada os /af ,«|il8X»if avX9«ai qoi PAS Sa Bao^Blt nalSasaodP snXaoXoaXd .aid iaodp biiow »dS ,to -’ ^ , ■ •■ ■- ' .. '- ■ *^.'- < ,’.ii i tM9 ssds aiinlqA^ ad! aaa tts pa soJXdcoe daa ,aooi ad9 to * I * -aslyacl* ,aaruXar pas pds *301 iaa A.tXmlX" ad9 ^^ilaaaoaa 10 ^ a«oi(foit #49 Jad9 bPSatclb * , taoaii/H ■ 8aa 9i«»T i>aa ‘ , voniit ba# AoX9 %' ijj fl* allirlaqXq a*ta« ,iaird »d ila b^cada b«»buXa 0 i a9aaq «tfoXsav ad9^tp ,*ta#ra pXx^b ai poaialo'f salatado ata d9od ' , , ^ ,iap -Jaa» tid ,aa«&oa XaoX9Xio a*9ooH lo **a«cif 9ai'r*uid** ad# to ataoa \Z . ' '..j - „ ■- ■ ‘ ,jr 4 ffX baaaa'iqao^ a#aoq a#X 70 Pal tXd to aoiaiqo ##aq#diXab ^aa o^o 4 ilf.C a 0l . 80 X#aaXaiXiostb Btsa a^aoXXab ^inaXDX.tX'so Xaiaas to #liiXqa ^ 7" ,.r '; ' - -tiad a d%uotdS %txi%ubq li •# Xaal aa adood ow# ad# lo Xaa’inaq xXt» ■ •■ . ' ‘ ' -n '’i‘* •«■ V '» a • ;if IB abiov '^i^aldBltv ,aa#iaqai #a aia ,11/0000 baa 4 #Xa^aiadlr XXad #aao ■ . ■'< ,, ’ ■ * ' ■ ' . ■/ ' j' B/1 ' odoa aa do#ao 0# baia^ioX avad a« T«#la taa (i»d#o doaa #asiasa I HJt' #c av'ad oiia •oiadwaaX# qlap #i#too a iabaoq,tO^ baqqoia av’ad »#itd ... ‘ ^ ■ ‘V- r '^.y, <■ :-i av ^ #oaq«oi#ai^ 0 # labXvoda i#to dooX tan #f.a|#d«^o# amoa‘##aX ' " ' V -■ . ' ^ ' ‘' . ‘J ./ -dsado ad# aaw fdZittfji oaodiarad aw #a4v tadfadw attfa a^iap loa aia mJ' 77 le of cunning and vulgar acuteness, the roar of obstreperous jol- lity, the compact of imagination and fancy playing with good fel- lowship in the Forest of Arden; or whether we have been listening to the Gargantuan laughter of those who mock at creatures of di- vine intelligence tied to a belly that must be fed, and hearing the intoxicated laughter of revelers at a feast where invisible hands are forever writing on the wall. But be it the one or the other, sure we are that Mr. Hunt has given us a feast. Are we of those who stand aside, looking critically at life as a procession of amusing figures? Tnen the books are full of laughter and comedy. But are we of those quick with keen feeling and alert with intel- ligent sympathy; then the books have in them the substance of tears and tragedy. Apart from the coloring which individual moods may lend to them, the imagination and the fancy, the wit and the humour which we find in them are excellent; they are full of the essence of all the good sayings of all the wits and humourists who have laughed their way into the hearts of men. As we have progressed toward the end of our pleasant stay with Leigh Hunt, we have come to feel very strongly that his place in English literature is a singularly high one. We have felt at times that he is not appreciated as is his due. This lack of es- timating him at his real worth is probably due to the wide field which his writings cover. A little less of what was for the pass- ing moment only would, perhaps, have won him greater recognition. But with necessity at the door, choice to limit his field was not given him. Meanwhile let us accept him for what he did. At his best none has surpassed hiip in kind. He was never supreme as were certain of his contemporaries; but there was one thing in which '?( ' -lot « 0 O'x*qftt^o9 iltiv saXtfiXa bn» Uo i i e,a Li^Attfl to #oA:, aciaaoooaq a um oxU ia x^Xactii tO' SDildoX /abloa tkMid oitw aaoilt • Xi'oiroo 6fla tfdrtjoaX to Xiat e*ia_, apCooO ortf oaxl'T tttaiolXt ^2ao«a to — B ' ‘ - t" ^ ' ® ■' ' ' ' w * ; -iauai liJiw iitXa taa s^oilgat afd iStXv aloX«^ aaont to'’ aW ata ^ivfl '* '* ,f " ftf'-*' V ^ /'.'iw: , n to aoaoaadva 9di eadi ai aTad adootf odi ‘ttAdi ixAimqa^* laasiX — - ' ^ ■ _ 'V. « jf: atooa Imsriytrlbal doidw aulnoioo »ot &a?t JiaqA •XliasAtlit.baa a'ltao^ f’ /- •* ^ '; J iff ' ■ „4((S|l ' 4, ,. , ' dds baa ti« od^ od;^ haa noiM^X^aoii 9dS •eiadt/o^ daaX '■'1 < * I ,-aa to doal till? .a#i Bid $i aa teJaloa'vqqa ibti ai a^i tcd4 Aamit oitt*ta liot Ota xadX laofXXooza 01 a aodi'‘ai bait a« dotdv ij;roiBOd < ^ ' * S i . "'- ' ('"•»i- odv B.)a J tao^god baa a41a adi, XXa to-, «;biJixaB bootik ad;^ IXa. to a( ’ t-' 1 ;'. .aam te a^taad 9di ujai xaw tXad^ badsaaX avJin ■ .-t U ' I- xaXa Maataar«| moo to baa adt baa«ct boftao-myofij aveit' aa ai. jf ' ■j m'i'- aoalq Bid iadi tXtJocs-Jt K'XdV Xaat 0 w‘ aaooHvdd aws , Jooir dii aj dtl9 ia ^lat avai^ #9 .aAO d^td xXmaXo^ia « ai atbiTamaJ'XX daiXsafl aX bXoit obia 4»d^ oi ao6 xXiiadOtq a! dJioV Xoai aXd^'ia «ld saXiiatcriit . -tf -aaaq adi mot aaa Jadw to «aaX‘ aXJ^IX .ma^rdo osaXiirXiw ald^doidw^f ' ., «ir ' . 9 . acl iloigooai maidaiift aid ^aow avad>, aqadrtaq ,bXooir xXbo iaaftipm -itil JfV‘ 000 aaw Malt aid o9^, aolodi) t^oob tdf ia^x^tbaaoaa d^Xw idd . Bid -tb .bib ad tada lot aid 'jrqaooa la iat aXidaaaaK .aid aatXi atoa ta aaoiqoavmaraa oaw au '\halM ai aid ba««aqmjia ami aooa Xaadaj " ■ ' " ■ ■ If ■•-'j ‘‘if ' ■'* •'' ■ „ dolda ni '^atdS eao ad-* u|^mad4 $s$d ;aaltam9qaalaoo aid to aia^iao ^rnakMBd 78 he ranked first: in the imaginative glow and warmth and kindliness of his desire to open doors, and to lead us out of the prosaio life of every>day, and enable us to forget the dulness and the mean ness of the actual. It was his purpose to give wings to our imag> ination, and to set the winds of inspiration blowing; for it was his conviction that along whatever wondrous trail the awakened love of Beauty might finally wing its way, that love must have a start. To show us where it might begin, to point out the places where the imagination of others had taken wing was the supreme pleasure and profit of his critical service. He made no pretension to having discovered continents of originality, or new fields of inspiration. Indeed he believed in no separation whatever between them. The dulness of the actual and the beauty of the ideal are closely compacted to make the isth- mus that stretches between two eternities. What we hope to become, and what we long to possess .strike their roots deeply into what we once were, and what once we claimed as our own. There is no safe- ty, even were there a possibility, in cutting loose from the old. But because we can possess it only through individual experiences, the old will always be new. It is to this experience that Hunt would give us the wings of imagination, so that we might see and love, and love because we saw, the oldest things in their unspent beauty. Leigh Hunt had a theory that Love, Hope, and Faith in hu- manity, and Reverence, Beauty, and Service to all are the two trin- ities before whose shrine the heart should worship. If he reasoned at all it was with his heart. With his heart he loved, and laughed, and lived, and moved; in it he found the world of his fellowmen. ■ W" ’-eTj 07 ■' ' ; ' a ■ ' • K*ajCltai&[ J>a» ^;xmv a41 »oiw qXiooit jA9^m. x9g0aA to^ttoT ooootq »d4 too taXOQ 04 ^aiiotf Jd^Xm Ji ot«d«» ao «Otia o t| i« 4 a ojcotqoa tdl^ aav jaiv OMfoi bisii atodfO to dctiloaiiMMiii odl otoitvL pi' j .. -i;wV . J^■ - ooiVYoa XMDb 94 to W4 tb iritbiq pag^wwppswXfi to o^noal 4000. bortotoot tl> tad o4 ooiaaoiro*iq oa abata^oB ftl bavoiXod ad baobal .ooX40iXqaaX to abXaXt ireo to ,x^XX0frlBtto f/ ir t* Xbo4o0 044 to aaaaXob >47 «8Ta44 aofwiwti larwiadw ooXffaiaqoa 00 • • ■? 0 ; -f'*r'''Slw .04al ed4 a40A.o4 biiSocq»oo x^Atofa »ta XatM 044 to x^tfaad «ti4 b^a lit , asoDOO oi^.,frOoiS «v 4adHf .aal4X0t«»4a o>4 aa»w4od aia4o4ai4ot4a44Xaaa- aw larf'ti 640X moot i,X«44 a4ti4 o»f aaoaoq o4, ^aoX ow jaita baa -at«a oa aX ata0T> .owo tao «a baffiXaXo av ' ooao 4aiiw baa^ , ataw toao .bXo 044 moYt OaooX on244oo ^aX ,x4XXiai«ttoq^a atadi aiov a»?a «x4 v;a .aaodoitaqxa XaabivXboX (v^jaotdx xiuio 4X aaaaaaqsiaao aw aoaaoto 40fi^ 40OB 4fUl4 ooiTaitaoxa aXOi 04 aX 41 .wan ad ^ Xtr JbXO a44 . n ^ ' h -f' ' "* . , ' * boa aao Id^X^ ,aw 4a44 o« to'^Usoiw a04 aOj^atX^ bXdOw ^ 0^- iaaqaoa tla44 oX *80x04 ioabXo' aai .waa aw aaoaoad aveX boa «avoX / ' ■•'" iir >o4 0/ d^iaX baa «aqofl .^arcj 4ax'4 x^0b44 a bad ^a»E A^iwd ix9uMwar 11 >, -aJLY4 o»4 o44 ata X4a o4 aoiTYtS boa': » till' naaB .aoootataB: baa \x^^AMm bvooaaat o4 tl .qldOYov b£ao4« fftaaa ad4 aa|:Ylli oeoiiw atota(l;^aaX4X t., ^ V. ,, ViadSbAX boa vbatoX ad 4taa4 aid 44Xf .4iaad eXd d41w aaw,4i XXa 4a .aeo'voIXat: aid to^bXiow ad4 bnoQi.t ad tX 0 I { bawom. ba^ .barXX. vAr J boa r4r' i 0 • f wii 79 BIBLIOGRAPHY Several fairly satisfactory bibliographies of Leigh Hunt and his works have been compiled. To four of these, which taken togeth- er, include practically everything published by Hunt, the present writer has had access. The references not given in the bibliogra- phies described below are included in the ''List of Books and Other Items Used in the Preparation of this Thesis." The four biblio- graphies referred to are, in the order of publication, as follows: Ireland, Alexander "List of the Writings of William Hazlitt and Leigh Hunt, Cnr onologically arranged; with notes descriptive, critical, and explanatory; and a selection of opinions regarding their genius and characteristics, by distinguished contem- poraries and friends, as well as by subsequent critics; preceded by a review of, and extracts from, Barry Cornwall’s "Memorials of Charles Lamb;" with a few words on William Hazlitt and his writings, and a chronological list of the works of Charles Lamb." Two hundred copies printed by John Russell Smith. London. 1868. The sections in this volume of particular interest to students of Hunt are, 1. Opinions regarding Leigh Hunt’s character, genius, and writings. 2. Chronological list of the writings of Leigh V' «> eif'XMi li&ttfv Y« 'ivol oT .l>«ilq«oo aa»c trj^ ait^ow »l& lcA» 1^irq •!$« baAtlX^wq 9u^ld^q*i*Te qllaoilo^iq «]birXoai \ •<* -^ ■’ f/fl ai navtir Xoa atoasT^ta*!' aciT ,»ate>a tafi V tati)^/ tif« % 1 /toos lo ^atJ" aiil ai iftebtrlaal o^a «oX»a ^«alao««a aaixiq -'Xxrfiti tso^ aiit tlxli 1« aaliaiaqaif aili a4 Jb#»tJ e«»^l , t > ■ ^ r* tarolXO hs »floUaolI t)6& {X.io'f auaXqxa Ac« .XaoiiiTa , • *ii*f} tno*ax> cclaan *? If i|ii la'll son •ao'lK^O Ye aoXtotXfl >jSf«aoi t •oXli^aai o-taiio c»sa f ifaafpott! 1 «* 'tI «a'7lXfV aa , leta ^^Kitaq AJranttft laa , Yn voi/on a xa«i tt luo maJXUf co ianaa veY a rf#ia •'-.fjraJ ¥>df lo aair rai/ia4XgavniX;r a li/a ♦»»alliTf oitf p ftfftqbo lonlaraai fw? Ya 4/lzoa .dddX .aolaci .dllaS: XX*»#<»wi' u4aw IfJuinq naXaoIiYaq' la a»aXo> olds It onoX/i>to odY .♦na HjrS i/aala/a «tf foanalai 4^a'/»anoaa "f'/oaft d\lf*X laXlnaaai ocerXalqO t-X 1 * * ' • *^ .iaaJlIia laa . •aiwasr IV Y9 aittf ixnw fif r lilX XadXso XoaozaD .& 80 Hunt; with notes, descriptive, critical, and explanatory. 3. Thomas Carlyle on Leigh Hunt. 4. Specimens of criticisms on Leigh Hunt and his writings; from the early volumes of '•The Quarterly Heview" and ’’Blackwood* s Mag- azine.” Johnson, Brimley R. "The Poems of Leigh Hunt.” London. 1891. The volume contains a classified list of Hunt’s writings, an index, books wrongly attributed to Leigh Hunt, and a list of portraits, arranged as follows: 1. Newspapers projected and edited by Leigh Hunt. . Eleven entries. 2. Contributions to Other Periodicals. Twenty five entries. 3. Essays: Collected. Twenty entries. 4. London Guide Books. Three entries. 5. Various Prose Works. Nine entries. 6. Selections from Other Writers and Critical Biographies. Fifteen entries. 7. Poetry: Separate Poems. Eight entries. 8. Poetry: Collected. Twelve entries. 9. Dramatic Pieces. Seven entries. Three of these were never published. 10. Fragments. Two entries. 11. Manuscripts. Six entries. oa ti tiMM *«9loo liSlw iiaaV \ ^ Mi^%9S»aMSfpLH * * K ^XafsU A»modf .€ :au9 tf'sHi «a«lel4ito to fc‘, '. to loll boltitaaio « fti(»t: 80 431 *.? tgtf botfXbo bam b«4o«C(>*tSr •‘c#q«qav«ir. X ^ no^»lC . .4ito|! 9l< o.l 'afiorX4o8l's4B<}9 t ♦ aOiAloo #vXt «8*i*il04 .3«4ti|lXoC to*t4fr .«ioot a&ibO 'tobacM. .4 »irX)t .aStol «»o»floU«ol«£^ *d ( .«8j;t4ao a«04txt ««8idqai3oi< ,88X'x4a8 t48iiaqoa tt'x^oos .t V .. . ' • 8el^4oo trioirir «Jb»4ooXXoO •cqtxoo^ .6 to o*tiit .8«I.taua to .Vtia** .ovt^O ,%*itvAtuoH i :a»lila« tnla , ^t ^ ofl XoO > i Ia&l9»09 «X // .aaSt^aa aaa/llt afaittifa* .••Itioa o»# . aalTol ^ 1 .••lilot saraS •t»J% .BaoitoalaS .4 * - * f ^.. ^«u3 A^iaJ Xtf &»*i 6 a ..oil 4 «*o:a«^aX .a3k00a 4>4> ■\ .aaladaa B I - ♦ ♦ I ' <1901 .taiof o/aa«*t€ *fi I * .012 .ftatricA^X tadJU 0 / aaoi f cr41x joo9 .9 V ,.(>f>i»fi 4 ^*# 4»a9ixa^A*iB ^ \ « r .cia 4»a*9liit: t V JP V ‘ifi *.' .098 .•aXolJ'U .¥ ^ •aia^X^xlt \o 9«i.JL iaolaoXoaoxat «A;^ I .* 'v 4 • « 4.4«lt9aa ' ■r '»♦♦{ :r'. » ‘ i '- * ’ I » i :-:» . *' . ' ' 1 ^ « • * ’ x»«ojr ^4 AalZJbX •.laffE Xt> 0 J'UAi* ,y«B 0 K iaa^tii’>toot taoKrav/s 9 tf 7 Pn« tiij io B'^AXiAs nf*d^o bnm % 99 sff 10I ^Idauiut .flS4i6 *19 XflA Ol h4t»ll ioa BtA «OlX0>l XAliii •«Bll »xt flit , # , - t' R- ' . • ^f- .Aiil^Aja •'lOlXtv 7flBf«ni| Axl7 «ro9 ATAd doii(v ^««ltfi|Ai:|9 ’ ■ , /•' , .. ■ ^ ** ,fitiJbaAt>PA** PA7 aX OtXAlX «1A eflAil oaX >oa iattfi ' " ’ ■ ' la '3toa4 •mil aJ 4(9 **.9ictA7 t*iAa.dX^ AAX t 4 Upl.A** XtfpAA tfiAXtAJAA BI 1 (XlXl -Xoo « Ad 7 111 Bfttoli la 4 AT »*1 £ 'i: • MO «nU» 7 «Op Ati#' It .4*1 •T’AA lAXfBXlo OOIIciAI ‘•’. V ■ ■ . ‘ ■•; •btxM^ t^bsTl ..totrB 14 t4»49 b9f(%ii4uqtifr 0^*io4itd ~fii baa \qlMoo% %• ^.aj^cpA k« tiAdi • a^tu u( ^ ' i 1 »B]| 6 §I lid |AA JAUB AO Adit AOjlBAtlX^^ tnA^iidtA lAdA:ki*roll i ’’.BAV^^At^ d 1 • .-lUPS eo BoAllA bfdXbsrtttq BlA litAiliBO Aaa boioi 9 lMolA%mi%oi^ k^_*‘.iaa?, d^Xci*' .lauB *^0 lAliMtl 04 \d AlArilB# .B .H .lAqlAH *& »B , 0 UBUilpt Id *‘B^AA^^laf *• , fdT '•,fJ4oivclIolt, eifT o«l #^«ii 'pfMti I tiaisS 4)^194 7o xbajf ia999%q *dt ai tt «0 I, H!. . U ^ k ftooott tit/ «/atR d^ltvt \6 id4)o 'quoax ed^' ,gi9lbl0 1'tci ba* xAqaruol^ \Q $bt9t9 ^4 ■K IfM "ki X '1 '*•■■%,, ■>■ i || li' ' , ‘ ' ■" > f *0«-< ftOlt »|it ^d,Bt/l-bt ,&ol9Lbm ♦ ^V ,t«A0XQf S itjiofl x4 bbtlbM »S4^4J.9ftAJS!JUill^ 4^w abiSibb fllmib k .tO?l .t^a «o0 k tIdjHitaoO 4 ' ' '■.^t "'fi^ • :^' .tO^X ,.)!.?? ,bo4ia^ %4 dtdtXXdt^ o#lt * ■“ ' ■ * [_i. , ? .«til .aoi»o«- .•*» itT»» a a»oi9^_»iOS4i&S4l»«T'^ io6f .fltfcjOJi .»•• 4>«iX<» eld %d 0t4lt| *,ttlB0Xt^T S > t^u t fcflPXtftA^j? .diOi f^tAcoA A ttiy * '"iP m%i,9u9A7 abbabifi 9 At tt. •&flA«^01k1w5 tpa 'ic ^^oUjtt^C '■ ' f • * ' .V08I .dpbflio4 initdot; but t^&btk fd b#4lbt bta btfttXtt . t^ctatf ? ' ' ' .#edX .aabQ«4 *tvb4 Air x«i| .40bnPJ .BOiJtdot^ .€ *Jf td bt/Xbt ,j^4ftri . '•'• ' t.** i 1,^ • ,t*»baq’oi 8l4tt»oalat ^Qt ftdbatfu. ,fiolJlbt baeott , J' ifa '' ‘^ ;' A*'; S^vV^ •if-:--.. U.'^'>.iSflSrR' '. >5i ■'!«' "1-“ ' J .•jtiax .itobuoJ "itriaB 84 Imagination and Fancy , or selections from the English poets il- lustrative of those first requisites of their art, with mark- ings of the best passages, critical notices of the writers and an essay in answer to the question, ’♦What is Poetry?** First published in 1844. Reprinted 1845, 1852; a cheap edition, 1870, The I ndicator. Motto: ’*A dram of sweet is worth a pound of sour,’* Oot. 13th, 1819--March 21st, 1821; bound in 2 vols. 1821. A Jar of Honey from Mount Hybla, Smith Elder. 1897. The Literary Examiner . London. 1823. Leigh Hunt* 6 Journal . 1 vol, 1850-51. Leigh Hunt’s London Journal . April 2, 1834--Dec. 31, 1835. Bound in 2 vols. Lord Byron and Some of His Contemporaries . London, 1828. Men, Women, and Books . Smith Elder, London, 1870. T he Months ; description of the successive beauties of the year. London, 1821, The Old Court Suburb ; or. Memories of Kensington, regal, criti- cal, and anecdotal. London, 1855 and 1860. Poetical Works . Row finally collected, revised by himself, and edited by his son, Thornton Hunt, with illustrations by Cor- bould, 1860. Rot in any way complete, with no plays. The Reflector . 2 vols, London, 1811. The Seer ; or. Common-places refreshed. 2 vols. in 1. 4th edition, Boston, 1665. The Reformist’s Answer to an article entitled ’’State parties,” in the last Edinburgh Review (Ro. 30) by the Editor of the Examiner, in which paper it first appeared. London, 1816. Stories from the Italian Poets. London. 1846. if i -iTiar 4#1» >o *•'< to- la/t »tfj) Ici «#c>i^^6X al fiiMtS^duq^ .-iifo* t<> JbuBuq « £i:iow §i !•••• to ^ntJb x** to^^oR .loiO oX/tal^otf^ ^ r ,X6*! .«Xor t ai tnaoO.yjXSftX , »§X4 0'X^ ..fltf SX *JO^ •* ■ \ . • tS0X .loiXJi <(1 XaiC .aIOxH ^AdoU ffOtt to A .(SIX \aobac4 ■ ’ > f I .10«Q46I .lor X_ .X antPli i*lfltfB iHl»l '-' ■ '■ -\ , ''' J'’ ■. .ai5X , X6 ,ooC--lft8X ,S XlrtqA . X 4 g obnol rf^lilJ • «Xor S orX bauot g S.y , _ ©sex .IftlaiOA Msi.[ * * . ^ ‘ .OfiX .aotaoJ .noi^XS oXiwO .oioo C .ar Jioi 4«»M •0/ to jioIXaaoO •tic.«OQ9ff« to ablitiinobrnk t i. X' .'.", ’"■■ Tty ' .X£^i^ fOokfitiA V ,,, -x^fito .Xo^ot * 001^0 ifcocx to «#i*io«iois ♦‘30 i4*r. i*Mu tt. i t o 1 1,0^4 ? bam 0^01 tttbhatj. .XVxoOood* la* ‘^t»6 ^ O' lir* ,iXi>Affllii l•4ir*•l ♦••j 'tlXoo tof ♦ *Xf oXO »ix >g •roo cao 14**1 ; «oX X X' 44 in ♦4o0H ao4aio4T «Mokv*iti xtf > .«X*iq oa <\ilTK ,ft4#lO0OP too a;i^ t.o^ tlXuro'icX^y^ .XX *t ,flOlMTc4 .kXor S ♦x o4oqJ 1*H_ o0g^ flOi4iX* 441 .X Ai .*If»f X .l•a•!k'lt•*x •*o*Xq-aOB»tO& , to rtO'S[ welr*I 0« to l»ud Id^tn^VOOO Aoi6^ Di » ««a, .• 2 mH i»a.*sAfl*‘i-|a01 * ^ . A. «8^6X ,ietl8 94X0:4 ,ooi>9oa ^laomMU ham 4lvi» t 1 ^ 'rn a X401711ID aiU JA,OIHSaMO«ll jvftcriotft 9otr #tjii$*'{ - I •▼4ii 140 ivJ^o4t to 4ltritoq 0^4 oi ^ttXuuaoo' ooiol^ia 49ix 10 >0 toioot e/<4 o4 lOtti 04 »XX9« 94 t 0 « 4l^4I^^UOtf4 i.*4ao8 tc .o4t .•io44fi , vlaiiintrot , •oioq^rxyo id iat Oi ttooo^tloi: ^ ‘ I 0 -oiX<4itf OAl ■! frffvot fid q««i »oo»«t«lf>n itout qitAil' . •«it»ioqmf40O)O " ■■ . otcfoOiiaolt oni^iQfr oOi to 4nt AiXt H # ?* it*/ . ■$'.* no Oo4 aotoa ai-» i>d^ooXoitv.) «j|^ •.o vojl 800 ioOo«4l,i4|i • i'P ex »nr>t$ oolo 1 4 at n I . et iX , act^44, . tiV ^ « %di . a.Aooj| Af 0 to ,mtnaX *8ill T .xOI-iS&ilXX ^oaiftosoi *ita^ B . ! • ', ,•'■ -y, i. ; L*' :>io4oX© iXnof ol otiA *W$X .cioiaoa «»mA to 44%Xqe *Mf ,J44Xii»Ji ' .- "^ ' “ “ ' _ ' '^' ■ "iifc.. , 4 0^ I ill iX«i*XO ©Xioti 4£|4 ooi, •*! fOoVifi > 4A9a olai ol Vl^floooitoL 49ft aoX4oi»8oi49l «idXiEoi4g bga £op5^oi> 499^ OaiQjX *i( *8 •4a43f,||. . boin iKi:*.! ^QtAJ%ttf<^ to ooiiroo l«9i]|hi^io •OYl© «©88X ,4iAi^;.ioq 0 ' ^ A 86 Mitford, Mary Bussell. Beoollections of a literary Life , 1862. Monkhouse, Cosmo, Life of Leigh Hunt . 1893. Moulton, C. W. The Library of Literary Criticism . VIil53-172. Noble, James A. The Sonnet in England, and Other Essays . 1896. Saintsbury, George, History of Criticism . Ills 246-49. Saintsbury, George, Essays in English Literature -^ 1780-1860. London, 1891. Symons, Arthur, Essays by Leigh Hunt . Edited with introduction and notes. In the Camelot Series. Trelawney, E. J. Recollections of t he Last Days of Shelley and Byron . Oxford, 1906. Trelawney, E. J, Records of Shelley, Byron and the Author . The Now Universal Library. Routledge. Ward’s English Poets . In volume IV. Introduction by Dowden. Williams, Orlo. The Ess ay, Art and Craft of Letters Series. Winbolt, S. E. Coleridge, Lamb and Leigh Hunt . London, Bryce. 1920 From the Preface of this volume we learn that the author has attempted to put together in one volume the best pieces in prose and poetry of these three best representatives of Christ Hospital. He has endeavored also to weave together the strands of the lives and works of the three, and to show to what a re- markable extent the whole lives of these schoolfellows were interdependent and colored by early school associations and by the friendships that grew from them. rf”, ' £6 .. ^ .(IVai . iau Z d'^tpJL to oXJt'l •oe»^£> * ••woxKxto* ' -*^ .Stl-CfliiTT ,ii«« ie>J[ > i ta u^jKoXX'J ^0 »itg .V ,9 ,aolXoolf iaCftX . •tifttty trtt^O fia m ,bnMl%a^ aX g»nnoC »d T *A ••fflA'l ,«X(^DV .odax- 9 t^T£ ^ < #a toiO ♦ - i. ;» ■ .I'eei ♦ooi»aoi^|t aoX ♦owtopUfli itlXw bpilbw itiiX»JL t tf , et*a>g .ajyrf/iA « tixo«x^ A •. ’ ^ ' ■» 9oX*OL«0>ii9 at ,%9tba >, 7 . • . ' ' ‘^- ■■ ' _ t bad to tttoa yfg §43 lo aj^icX>a»j^J( ppofl .t .8 »AT - .dO«< ,l»iai 3 sO tOi^>* aA »flJ Att# aoi ti > 0 >fc ioo»g •& .^SAi<(XJ £0%H(i7ia9 w«K,. ** ^.■‘*. i 1 * "'^1 .a0lJ%oC %A ablt ouirb^iftLl .VI ptpalcf aJ ^w dfO^ J .Qptibb BfJiad Xp iMtlt bad brUL »dt ,.oXsVi f gjitfl if^i §j i^ad a f*04 , 1 1» x o 9 .8 .8 ^ilo 4 sti^ tadiuK p4^ •« dnutlpf aid'd >0 #00104*1 #il%ot ft?### ad oeidf' bdtorddba* add .X«XXqtoB •>•a#q«^y#;trU •' iftftjid 004 ! #448 9 did gfiidababl^^ 4'^y? ■. ■ I ' »-1 < i. • 4«- ■Jt/" ; mt. ■* ’^1 i — 87 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF LEIGH HUNT’S WRITINGS CHRONOLOGICALLY ARRANGED 1801 Juvenilia 1801 Poem in European Magazine 1801, etc. Poems in Poetical Register 1802 Essay in Monthly Preceptor 1804-5 Papers in Traveller 1805 Theatrical Criticism in News 1807 Theatrical Criticism in Times 1807 Critical Essays on London Theatres 1807 Classic Tales 1808 The Examiner 1808-9 Three Songs, published separately, set to music 1809 Me thodism 1810 The Reflector 1810 Reformist's Answer to Edinburg Review, No, 30 1811 Report of Proceedings against Jihn Hunt and Leigh Hunt. Printed at Stamford. 1812 Report on the Trial of John and Leigh Hunt, with Observations on the Trial by the Editor of the Examiner. These observations are dated Dec. 13, 1812, Dec. 20,1181g, Deo. 27. 1812, Jan. 9, 1813. 1814 Feast of the Poets 1815 Descent of Liberty 1816 Story of Rimini 1817 Round Table (Published in Hazlitt’s works) al noo*t^i 4, '^- 9e7»i«»K f#oii«oS nl •n«Q^.o^*^ ,XOQf s^oex toiq«*o«nr^ XlAtfaoU i*l T«*«l ,, -h \,\. ■'* 1 e X i • «*x!U '' a 1 q*5 *7fl nl atioiJ liO-XA|>ii$«it4¥ itolT ai »iif ncbaoJi ao «i(«fiil a**oex V '-• t«X#f 0i«««XO 4i • ^ l»jSiD#X8 «tft '/V / eleir ni SttM i>«it4iJU«(ri .iiOIBOC 'W titijboHsrox xotctjiXkH eHf 1 ■ * 0<: ,ol .««2r»ji s'lutialBI oi >i4C d;stb4 •■«* ' ^.i', * I ‘ f?. dXX» dttXel 1>0« axlol, \p XBlal «d4 ixo •' 1 ■*■■ ■ ■!' • tU to %09ibi 0li3 10 X«i^T 0d3 no 0a«l4«VT0*' - !,’ 14100X4 to /aooiOQ i * ■ '■ ' . ' ' -i ?3i •'^*;’ "" ^ ■' - *' ® ,/; talmig to iio:d8" ( «dto» 0 *d4X X0oE‘ aX XodiiXdal) olci«T^X»W&oE 88 1818 Foliage 1819-22 Literary Pocket-Book 1819 Poetical Works 1819 Hero and Leander, and Bacchus and Ariadne 1819 The Indicator 1820 Amyntas 1821 The Months 1921, etc. New Monthly Magazine (contributed to) 1822 The Liberal 1823 The Literary Examiner 1823 Ultra-Orepidar ius 1825 Bacchus in Tuscany 1828 Lord Byron and Some of His Contemporaries 1828 The Companion 1828 The Keepsake 1830 Chat of the Week 1830-2 The Tatler, a Daily 1832 Chris tianism 1832 Sir Ralph Esher 1832 Poetical Works 1832-3 Year of Honeymoons in Bull’s Court Magazine 1833 Papers in the True Sun 1833 Wishing Cap in Tait’s Magazine 1834 Indicator and Companion 1834-5 Leigh Hunt's London Journal 1835 Captain Sword and Captain Pen 1837 Articles in Westminster Review 1837-8 Monthly Repository Xeoa-7*XoQ^\'iAi«i J.4 ^ w. . ■ n .'if' i^i\bm^^k bau Mu&ooaiL baa ,iaJ»ajaad bfxa o*i»B V W ''p Y 0 7 « 0 iJC^iiZ blit f I. f , aaritxnik^ ►if «ii 4 n&lL »XIT f 'i it - (oS baJuiUriaCit) aalaa%aU . v«11 ,ttia ,XS6I ' ■ f, Laxacll #tlT ' f, f* ' i ' « <* i,. «( 7 l *1 Ab Iq 9 { u qffAOA|^f Al KtfdOOAS ttivaioqntv^aoO tlB to eccC laa ao*txd broj ■<» > •« ■ • #1 t T •i'.. a t 3 eoiea^AU a*£h£ nj AAdOArqAAofi Io^iaoY »«(5 birr!* aaj Jxl^a%azMt »aia*nau a* Hat ol q«0 ^uldai’V ^ ■: ..-t! r ■» ’ J. 4 . aoZs.eqiaoO 6 di? .>j(A«q 9 eB dxiT <«if ant Yo iadQ ^I|a:;4oot^{( osrift ^ ' i''" ' i; ' '' • (6/nontfO ^XilJ(xuU\t4? al ' -y AXnoW i«oXitflt a2, etXoX^TiA A*" ft*f»XXovoE huM djiloniiob^ aX ••Xa; • Iqo»^ e49 tTo «I)««E • Dovioi^ x»«7ii>« tii(« .itutfoA? ,«t*i^noO .^•X'i»rtetf K. < 0>fil o*ax^^ = t 'I , '■ 1 I " ■ M V , .1^ -V ■ m 'tog' #47 04SX i)#« i0T#bo#r w rll>« #Xoino’tiit> al ••XeXitA r0 ##lf#fl 3kiot(aXi)f ifi •eloX^iA:'< to-i»x«q- ^47 ' ij - ^ ,-.4. ■ V ' •aXi#»4iU qXcfXaolf ai afo>- A tr ■ ^ - , : • *nX¥ ^ -fc-A *> sji -Vi • ■3#470-S4 ■5^' t. 94V '**' ■ ’*1 ' j' n ' ^Xa# ftioi^oAloC ) 0#M«1X myit iittinio^g „ T - , _ V, &_?>■ _ ’f-t, l#ft6#i#0oK ii##*i#fX:apl_^iiJ #4® ^ d^ax “■ W ' , , * "^8401' ri: ■■ , '‘V at XXiX#:#ia Libt%tiiB b’f* 9*49 t«X9XT *''' d Jh '*f K ■*# 91 «qAi> 90irfi .Eno4X#oq#4 qX4j^9*oii #49 nX a#4#iXoq' ta-lXtl .#•’>■ " "' , • -..fc '• tt. .^®EX«| aldiiti: An«»E \o aolEH^E f't^ tOinXT I4ai«i/S cl^AeXcl4^4 ddex 1 ^'^IJ i » *<»W \ * ni 1 * u •8A0X * , * 1 i ' M w 1' H ♦sAei ■ di tAei , ‘ •, 1 lii' I T ^ ceei ^ --m J F ' r,%- deal i da el “'IMoaex^ r liMm 0481' jh , '■ i] [ ;^S ■> 1 Di i- B T I4.0d8l!| ♦xaex aaax lEt y i.t E^' f % £4 ax ',** "1^ TV K i-.. ' ■' j A-aaox ■'1^ 1 “ ^ AN ^ . .j aAtqW DladAapoHvial A.2$d8l D tliircfcri- i7;>iitf 0 i>XO roe ' (Jba4odi*«) *s>0A«7#Xf Alt* 9aozn04MkE -*y ad ex ^tiS aaex • ni dAex tJti^enA) •Ai«« a»ot$ . . I'iHf I (naaaoa) atCtivV lAaiXi»a^ (5 ^ ’ vaex ta0x •tfitdiE«U t !ti i»Xi)i49A vaex .4 1£,'^ ' M 1^ -% . I *fOAaX*»iq[d aX ^X*aoi««a*0 edT 1 . ASiltOlX XAOi^tO'^ ;*. • {(loiiiAtt ii#ai %Aq»i.i^o kio4a^ ^‘•OeftX ~~ / ^ ‘ if' ‘ ip '^ ’ tot m 14 V ’ V'& ♦tlM x£l{^Ot 0 X, V m to q«Q 1 ^ tTftX I'i Bo4oa 404 .otjoi iliiir. { ftiiiStofi iol#mAO)\ ftxooafi *fe 4 X V trtOffifC txrd^oi, * #■ *__ ‘ • 49 on AOMOiil 404 ^ain^ to f«r«o 3 . 4 * < «ooiXo*l* 8 ) 4 a« ««• aot/H 4 S ^«4 an«X ioitox(OAX<^ j idsiaS xd L#il 4 t .a^tiF x^ e»f«T •oaoOot .& 7 ^ ./)• .JAivn iSiJtoJ 1 (> ai!Q«<;)^’' afi? ooooxIq; ,j) *B \d pt« ,iouH 03/64 to ixotuft «a«x^ fiOQO^Ol xa f 4 f •a«isT} xa eofiO/ 6 X& 400 »XA«< ■!1 ^4 (ifOtJO , 60 /at 4 lD 4 lloV Al) «*Ttticot al aaov** Ii0//ai^of> #49 ot t44»cUk oi /j '? n ‘■i ws tvtl barn tatfciA %d •b* .at 4 *»S 1 \* * * -I acibiiioj .oaacUKI si/auA X<1 .fc* sxtsoti tXO ♦#€81 ♦SO€X bafAtaaolXi , aooax^ atrao .onJai K;Xv ax***^ it*!/ m aoiduQ .f' „■■ - o£(i#oj .8.U oft*x6f 4*14 »aoiX oi aooX/oaXoa Hto 5 „ ,.• .i*. * »n ' to axaroAjx XjtoiaitO oa/i^oB** oi) 't%i99on aoitwL (titoTXO .oottoL .cT 4 S X -48 eioit KJxo/aotXofi »9fst/S 4^/fJ boo dauaX ««Sl>/ioX40 Mli: ♦Ot«X . 'l^J J #9 »a&/ 4 C 42 >Q*i 4 sl ilalw^ boo oiot^ tioiliX XX 44011 f ai 9ii ADDENDUM Mr. Luther A. Brewer of Cedar Rapids, Iov7a, has given to the present writer the rare privilege of examining unique Hunt items, and of obtaining from his collection information about Leigh Hunt not otherwise accessible. Undoubtedly I.!r, Brewer has one of the finest and most complete Hunt libraries extant. Besides possessing a complete set of first and other interesting editions, he has a variety of presentation and association copies, many unpublished letters and manuscripts, proof sheets, and the original manuscripts of a number of Hunt’s published works. I nave Mr. Brewer’s kind permission to list the following items from his interesting and unique collection. LETTERS Letters Letters Letters Letters This is a group of twenty-seven letters written by Hunt to his wife while he was in prison. There are fourteen letters in this bundle, written to him by his wife, and most of them while he was in prison. These prison-period letters are pathetic in character, disclosing the poverty of the Hunts. So far as Mr. Brew- er can tell, they have never been published. These letters, forty-six of them, were written by Hunt to Mrs. Hunt between 1803 and 1812. Another bundle contains seventy-two letters from Hunt to his wife. These extend over a long period, beginning with 1625 and extending to 1852. UtratKTCA •5 « ■ 9 ^ c»tlxi %«if ^«»Al . 4 ff %»U»0 lo '^ontta .4 t»drjra * 7 X K icdP xitltj; ioo(ia aoli*»toiai aal};>»);lob aid flioal aaltrloi^oo td Imit I fdi t iico %#d .oX«»t««oo 4 ••i»t*d 9 o^d'Ois a#l)^«o 3 4 «l‘ii«^dil dftu^ •iafqJoo J«om tn« intuit M tad ad . aco IJk# >aiftatvict ladio beri aa'til lo i*« ^SvLum^t a aadalldi/qao x°^*;oiot «tii . 0 O»Xtq ol aaar ad aX Xiiar ta jmcb f/ 0 « $tM'V $lti i(d arldt ** jfl ' > !^e^. fil oJ/ntJt^ Pts BfdfbS bol'ioq-aoaXt^ ttadt ; V ''I •vafif *i 3 l 4# n«i ,0fattn «di to 041 l^oXnoXooib .bf'dtlXdr^ 5 t»l' ■i '-i ' C? ■" : 7 i^» , !?y T-"*" .fiX8X 4df C^X naf«X«tf XavlX .aiX 5 ; 'S * -ii* (fS,IfseVI fBoit oatfr^dofifoi adXddooo a/Odod tOd^o< # f polditisod « 4 oXnaq naoX a tovo OsaXav aatdS ,*«tx« aid ‘ UP ' .; I'l 't- • Sdi)I 04 XdX|rfldX 4 .A d 4 X« K _ ' i •-■ - P. 4 , r ■« 93 Letters Letters This is a bundle of ten letters written by Hunt from Florence, Italy, to Bessie Kent, sister of Mrs. Hunt, These letters disclose his old love for Bessie, and con- tain several references to Mrs. Shelley, as well as to his English creditors and his longing to return to Eng- land. A group of original love letters from Hunt to his future wife, Marianne Kent. MANUSCRIPTS The Palfrey . This is a complete manuscript of the poem, showing many corrections and proofs of Hunt’s care in revising his work for the printer. B ook of Beginnings . This item is the original holograph of the "Book of Beginnings , " first published in No. 3 of the "Liberal. This later manuscript differs materially from the printed book, and shows in a delightful way Hunt’s method of work, and again proves how very carefully he performed it at times. Italy This is a complete manuscript of a contribution to the third number of the "Liberal. The Heir of Mondolfo . This is a manuscript of nine^-three pages. The Secret Marriage , afterwards The Prince-* s Marriage . Hunt explains in his "Autobiography" that this was a play in five acts which he had written, but which he had never published.^ 1 1. See Ingpen’s edition of the "Autobiography 11:226-227 T' Tt ■aBvt-mtB ya*Ti"i> 13 tr% 9 . 4 Ltm •’x#iJ*X a »3 tfibdvd M 4 I iin? Tt«D onii lot •▼ol bio fin oioicAib oioiioX o&o£(t go# Uk i.i 6 « to ,%«XXOi(e .tlK Oi^OOflOlOtOl XolOYtt OiOt ~)$r£ q3 0tcr#»% oi'vsaiBaoX tin boo tioliboio itbiXj^aX tXit • 12 ^ # 1 * .baoXv^ ■ ’ Jill onoiat sin pi 7 noB otoit tioi^roX ofoX XobiaXio to 900*13 A> t i , . ' ^,l N ■ : i .PatB oafioJion , 9 ti« ■t: i f ^ ' ■ ssaKoamiAK % .y ^ I a I ^Baiooiis ,ni »09 o43 \p o^iioaoaoBx ploXfnoo * oinT .to itloV ^filolTOi 0 i «*0iur!i to itoot() iiojt polio 0 \aui y .loiifl tiq p4t lol il'iow tin o4i to nqoiBoXod X^nlfiip od# oi «oii isiny . tBRitsai^oa to fdr to 6 .pi cri bodtiidoq i tilt . oBalcoiBoa to ioo8»' iroit '^Xl«Xio:7A^ aiottlb iqiiosonarR toit/ lid? «*ii3u!? XulidBlXob M at swodt baa ,i!ood boJoiiq oii| td ’ilX 0 t»i 0 o X19V oort povoiq nX«BO b«a to bodfo« • •orcli Jtb ii boiyiotf iq on 9 V Mti fidl od cpi«adXiia«i;< « to iqlipsoaam pro [qroo, Aid%.^ I • - -• sisii' ,w .Xpitdiil*' OjU to ipdaua btkdit « to^nq ooid to JqXioowajiW « ai tIdT ^ .o tiob ',' ' > 0 il< liaXqjtp laoH . pb>o*io»ta * ?X 9 A ■ „ ' ’’' ' ■‘.i- ■ioo pTit ni A »«w eXd< dndi "t^qoiBO IdoiOA*' . Pin ai r .bbftpt Xo oq fpkvoff bail so doidw iraci ,ai9rittt^ !bA£i pd doidw . TAS^PIi^i ''^xnqaiBbloodaA*' PHI to aoiltbP p'aoqBaZ - . if 94 Mr, Brewer’s possession consists of many pages of trans- cript from the play, having many inter liniati ons in the handwriting of Leigh Hunt. The Friar’s Tale . This is the manuscript of the modernized version of Chaucer’s poem in the handwriting of Hunt. Fragments This group consists of about five hundred pages of Hunt manuscript of a fragmentary character. Mr. Brewer has not yet classified this material. ITEMS WITH ASSOCIATION INTEREST Testimonial . This item consists of pro o f s he ets of a testimonial promoted by Browning, Dickens and others for the erection of a monument in Kensal Green Cemetery to the memory of Hunt, with Robert Browning’s autograph corrections, and a statement of the condition of the fund in Browning’s au- tograph. This item is absolutely unique . Harold Sk i mpole . Six autograph letters from Dickens to Hunt contain- ing expressions of friendship and making pathetic refer- ence to his alleged caricature of Hunt as Harold Skimpole in Bleak Housej with two letters from Dickens to Thorn- ton Hunt on the saibe matter. Bacco in Toscana , by Redi. This is Leigh Hunt’s copy of the Ital- ian original of his •’Bacchus in Tuscany,” Many of the pages contain autograph notes and comments; and it is thought on that account to be the identical copy used by Hunt in making his translation of “Bacchus in Tuscany.” Bacchus in Tuscany . This is interesting because it bears through- 16 taM £ci«*c«v drf^ ’lo iqZiOHa 0 «xti ads aidt ^o ln^ t/ty .9auH iV'iiaIJi'xiiliBBil •As al otoq 10 fajifi to ooBOfl b» lOlVooto »{(^ ct«d;o 090 «ao3(ox(t .BuXxrvonfl qd BoXomOtq \toH«« 0^4 01 qi#ieao& Xoa/foS aX laetovao* a to . ■ f 1 boa , Bdo 1 1 o«ito 0 doAt^tolrro « *j|olc*ro'ia J*»©c6$[ dliw .tfo a'faibvott al booi to ttoXlibno.o odt too laomoooia ’ . fMiS3-JL^J Uv LiiJi%,..^^ .dqatBoi I t c 'IS- 7* I»lfl06 snift 01 ao*J(oiC ftfitf A*i»*x%olPA *Xt . » 1 0 qy I Jtjt OX 0 l»g.j -lOtO'i oit^Aia<( $kidMa ba» r,;dft 6 d 0 l f:,.. boaw Bqoo iaoilnabi odl od oi Inaoooa ladl "no idBooiU ” .fttaot«? ml otfjfioaB*’ to aoMaXonatl old fl'a'iiB" ■' ‘-‘jyiljP^.. O'Jaod lA «*aboad »ttla«oilolol*’4l old?.^ 95 out the text many corrections in Hunt's autograph. These corrections are principally in the spelling of italian names. Mr. Brewer believes that the necessity for so many corrections lies in the fact that the manuscript was put in type and the proof road by others than the author, and that it was not easy to decipher the unfamiliar Italian names and terms. In no other way can he explain the pres- ence of so many corrections in the book after it was pub- lished. Masque of Anarchy . This item consists of Hunt's page proofs of the first edition of Shelley's "Masque of Anarchy." In this first edition the Preface is contained on twenty-six pages while in the proof sheets in Mr. Brewer's possession it is contained in eight pages. The beginning and the end- ing of the matter on these pages coincide with the begin- ning and ending in the First Edition, showing that Hunt must have called for additional page proofs to which he had made large additions in the way of copy. Mr. Brewer's proof sheets show forty-six pages of text instead of forty seven as printed. This additional page was needed because Hunt had added a note to Stanza LXXXI. The Genci . This was Shelley's first attempt at writing drama, and contains the famous dedication to Hunt. The volume is ac- companied with a letter from Shelley to Hunt asking about the receipt of the manuscript of the book. The Old Court Suburb . With many pages of Hunt's manuscript copy. Jar of Honey from Mount Hybla . With Hunt's manuscript notes of sub- jects for head and tail pieces. \ i . 2 lQ«tl| 0 ^C« ft*^nvtl ol* tiso I iO«'3tOO »(l9 *900 m*il99t io %(ti t i»qn 969 al \11 Mqiosutq o^a itaoiioo'xtoe itMC' XO^ %fl99909a 9dt 1 9d$ tOT^llAd lOVAItti . tM . AABAtl ^04 4qlX99ittLSM 9dJ 9MdS A 0«1 t>4d oJt 99it aflOXJOAtlOO bus st(f asdt sxsitSQ r,tS tssx 'ioQxq sU9 has oq%t dl V . -.- ; ssits4l xslLtmstaa sd9 xsdqlssb ot \bss raaisea ii isdd * \ o T. Koiq 9s: ntstqts tA dst ton io4io oa ai .•mtoi 2 >aA ■ -^crq 6 AW 91 'iSiXS XSOd Pdj ak •ttOlfOSXXOO tAAdi or lo Alla* * ' \ ■ >V •hsAstt Kfl# tc flot\g oytg •*#pim tf •jtoXaooo ss7l _±tdf •%fi9xsf$i tc 4 ./ sidi ai •.tAotaai. to sopssT’ \a ai>l} lbs i 9xX\ xLa^iXaswt uq bpals^uop ». 9ostsx% sd) aalilbs jpxIX 91 apixssxsoq .s^xsmsxH ,xH ai aIooAa to^tq oili at sllAw -b.io pd9 bus folaalsoA pA% .tOBaq }4T|io al hsulsiuoQ at •oiswd 9di 44lv eJ»i 9 »Zoo aoBaq as'^nbStsa sd9 to aiii i •.m - r--^- *.'■ < 'ii't 3au% lsd4 .ftfivoda rSSlitbE laxlt ptkJ al f^aibtts has 3ai4 * jES^Vj •il utiktis 09 «too*iq s^sq tsuoil thbm lOt tksUss ossd 9sun -j' *xs>9sx& ,?K ^0 %ss ,sdJ al saolHbbs s^xsl shsts bmu (TOt to bsstsuk la«; t# AtlAq sis^^xixiX wo4iijr«4A«Aa toortq 12 ? loaoAd tshssa 8A« isapifthts «i4? ,bs3utxq ss. as^ss nr-*' P- • IXJUIJ aaojK^B ot stoa s bsbbs hsd T'itdB. X>aa •artaia %ctilxw ts Sqaistfs datil •''t^AilA/ie ssw sldf if. a a a" 'CO st smalov sdt ,9auH o3 aqllshlbsh musiesj sdt salslaoo' .- ' ■ ■ ' •>. <, ' *' f it/ods XkAlXss CJ tsUbnq aoxX^%s9is£ s dita bslasqmso ^ 31 ,XooAiodf tu Sqlxosausm sd) Tto dqlsoot sdj .^Cqoc tqtxottrasa' s' SauB to sshsq xasa dSlB iXjfrbO p ( Q Oj|^ T '- »k .M #liw Aid «o*«) ?ocV dSitJ of** J 4 a **todi(A» ofli diiv. ,jau*z^a jb«io«l of* < t> ^ S ■ n lo q«saq aa7aXm ota «ibcXoV ildi |^flixcAq[«>odoA ,1AfiA« ftAiul'Kf' to A«9tAf €& ,Afl« 9Ct*09 d<3 8d^A/ al al badAiidvq aav %iaT *.S49X ,*bX |i AidAlv •■ ■ ^ -tot adol %A bAflbo taa A0A. ,YibO aAiqao 4V otoidibA^ xiA-^ Mi * # larl BBiVOXXot Adi AAJl AlflT .ACba itA b H A, AddOOda i • M - ^itAAdiAtvA ,bXo ^Aid^nl aoXltXtciAdi **.70diaA bBA bsAltl %'i aoo i lOAtta tod rotl iaA^I t^AA^ of** 97 Story o f Rimini » Inscribed to his friend thus: '♦To Horatio Smith, from his sincere friend Leigh Hunt.'* Beaumont and Fletcher . This was edited by leigh Hunt and inscribed ‘♦To Isaac Latimer, with Hunt's kind regards,” on title, and letter of Leigh Hunt that accompanied the presentation One wonders with Mr. Brewer how it has been possible to keep the book and the letter together all these years. The Poetical Works of Leigh Hunt , 1832. Inscribed thus: ”To Aristides Guilbert with Leigh Hunt's respects and regards . ” Legend of Florence , 1840. This was inscrioed to an actor friend, '♦Anderson Ssqre with the Author's respects and thanks.” The Indicator and Companion . 2 vols., 1834. "To Anna Maria Rashwood, from her affectionate friend the Author.” Wit and Humour . This is the Hunt item that holds first place in the Mr. Brewer's affection. In his little book entitled, "Around the Library Table,” he gives a charming Huntian account of how it came into his possession. On the half- title, in the beautiful handwriting of the author, is the following inscription: "To Mrs. Shelley (I mean "Mary”) from her affectionate friend, L. H.”