■V ^Av »f ^^^. 'fm "^•i. i L I B RAR.Y OF THE U N 1 VLR.S ITY or ILLINOIS Reports of the Oxford Tutors' Association. No. I. ^ ^ RECOMMENDATIONS RESPECTING THE EXTENSION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, AS ADOPTED BY THE TUTORS' ASSOCIATION. JANUARY, 1853. OXFORD: JOHN HENRY PARKER; AND 377, STRAND, LONDON. M.DCCC.LIII. The following Paper was drawn up at the request of the Tutors' Association by a Committee appointed on Novem- ber 19, 1852. It was read and considered at meetings of the Association held in Morton and Jesus College Common Rooms on December 10 and 13 : and adopted at the first meeting of the Association in Lent Term, January 24, 1853. RECOMMENDATIONS, &C. &C. INTRODUCTION. -L HE Questions which have been opened by her Ma- Origin of jesty's Commissioners, "appointed to inquire into the Paper. '^ " State, Discipline, Studies, and Revenues of the Uni- " versity," are of such variety and importance, and the changes which they have proposed in the whole system of Oxford are so numerous and extensive, that coming, as they have done, before us, invested, to a certain ex- tent, with the authority of the Crown, it is obviously desirable that they should receive the deliberate and respectful consideration of all classes in the University. All Members of Convocation, but especially those in any way concerned with the Discipline and Education of Oxford, might be expected carefully to weigh, as they might fairly claim to be heard with respect to, suggestions of such interest, and involving such wide alterations. Accordingly, within a very short period after the Report was issued, a Committee was ap- pointed by the Heads of Houses and Proctors to con- sider its Recommendations ; and when this Committee B 2 commenced its sittings at the beginning of the present Term, it immediately notified its wishes that the atten- tion of Members of Convocation should be directed to the same subjects, and that they should communicate with the Committee respecting them. It seemed to be felt that suggestions touching the University at every point ought to receive the deliberate considera- tion of all classes of its Members. A similar feeling led the late Committee of the Tutors' Association, whose sittings had been for some time suspended, to convene a meeting of that body, and to suggest its entering into an examination of, at least, the most im- portant of the various Recommendations put forth by the Commissioners. This appeal was responded to by the large meeting which took place in Oriel Common Room, November 8, where it was agreed that the Society should meet regularly twice a week to consider the several suggestions of the ' Report,' in such order as a Committee then appointed might determine. Meet- ings have since been held with all but uniform regularity, and have been attended by the greater number of those engaged in the discipline and teach- ing of the University*. It seems to have been gene- rally felt to be desirable at the present moment, ^r^^, to go through the whole subject, or at least the greatest questions, of University Reform, as opened by the Commissioners — secondly^ to collect for this pur- pose as large a number as possible of those Members of the University who are engaged in its Tuition and Dis- cipline, in order that from their various positions and points of view they might assist each other to con- sider these subjects in all their aspects — thirdly^ to * It may be as well to state, that the number of those who have been frequent attendants at these meetings is above 60 ; and that the average number at each meeting has been from 30 to 40. aj^^u uwc' % ^ elaborate practical schemes on the most important of the matters in which change seems to be wanted — 2i\\dL fourthly, to state publicly nnd fully the ascertained wishes of the majority of persons attending the meet- ings, in order to make known by these means the sen- timents of a large portion of the University with re- gard to proposed reforms, and to obviate that appear- ance of indifference to real improvement which either entire silence, or inadequate suggestions for alteration, might seem to convey. It is only necessary further to mention, that the two subjects which have especially engrossed the attention of the Association during the current Term, are those of the Extension of the University, and of the altera- tions proposed in its Constitution and Government. On both these points a series of Meetings was held ; and after the sense of the Association, with respect to general principles, had been sufficiently ascer- tained, a Special Committee was appointed upon each, to consider and report upon details. The second of these subjects is still under the consideration of the Committee appointed to report upon it. With respect to the first, it may be enough to say, that Meetings of the Association were held in the Common Rooms of Christ Church, Merton, and Oriel Colleges, on No- vember 12, November 15, and November 19, to con- sider the Recommendation of Her Majesty's Commis- sioners, numbered 10, in p. 257 of their Report, on the subject of University Extension : and that the following alteration of it was proposed, — " That the " provision of the Statutes by which Colleges and " Halls are obliged to have one common gate should " be annulled, but that it is no way desirable to per- " mit Members of the University to live in private 6 *' lodgings, without connection with a College or Hall." This amendment was finally adopted, with but two or three dissentients, by the persons present (41 in number). And it was agreed unanimously that a spe- cial Committee should be appointed to report on the best way in which the Extension of the University could be effected, and that it should consist of the following Members : — Rev. R. W. Church, Fellow and late Tutor of Oriel. Rev. F. Fanshawe, Fellow and Tutor of Exeter. Rev. A. W. Haddan, Fellow and Tutor of Trinity. Rev. W. C. Lake, Fellow and Tutor of Balliol, Senior Proctor. Rev. H. L. Mansel, Fellow and Tutor of St. John's, Mo- derator. Rev. C. Marriott, Fellow and late Tutor of Oriel. Rev. G. Marshall, Student and Censor of Christ Church. Rev. D, Melville, Brasenose, late Principal of Hatfield Hall, Durham. Rev. G. Rawlinson, late Fellow and Tutor of Exeter, Mo- derator. Rev. J. P. Tweed, Fellow and Tutor of Exeter, Rev. E. C. WooLLCOMBE, Fellow, Dean, and Senior Tutor of Balliol. The following Report is accordingly presented to the Association. If approved, it may, in the first place, be transmitted, as an evidence of the general opinion of these Meetings upon the subject to which it refers, to the Chancellor, Vice-Chancellor, Heads of Houses, Proctors, &c., &c., and secondly, may serve to express publicly, both as to principles, and in the main as to details, the sentiments of a large portion of those con- cerned in the education of the University, on the best method of its Extension. REPORT. In making our suggestions respecting the extension One mode of of the University, we begin by assuming, that thejected,asincon- principle of Collegiate discipline is to be preserved J^^^'^^^'Ji'lV''^ entire. Any plan therefore which makes no provision ^oii^giatedis- •' * ^ cipline : VIZ. for this essential requisite, is set aside as inadmissible : that of "Uni- , If • • 1 T varsity Stu- such for instance as that of permitting students to live dents." in private lodgings in the way recommended by her Majesty's Commissioners in pp. 44, 52, and 257 of their Report. And if we refrain on this occasion from en- tering upon a full discussion of the point, it is from no want of consideration for the arguments urged by the Commissioners; but mainly because the subject has long occupied the attention of the University, and the almost unanimous opinion expressed upon it seems to us to have decided justly against a system which vio- lates a main principle of our Education. The number of persons, indeed, either within or with- objections to I out the University, is probably inconsiderable*, who^*^*^ asc eme. , would wish to modify or change our present system by the introduction of a number of Students lodging in the houses of townspeople and unconnected with Colleges or Halls. Such a class, whether rich or poor, could but receive an education quite different in kind from that given at present, and (as we believe) of a very inferior description, while it would almost necessarily be exempt from such domestic control and discipline as has hi- * It is worthy of remark that her Majesty's Commissioners ap- pointed to inquire into the State, Disciphne, Studies, and Revenues of the University of Cambridge, have 7iot recommended the intro- duction of " University Students" of the above description. therto given a distinctive character to Oxford : if large, it would affect and deteriorate our moral and edu- cational system ; while, if small, it can be almost en- tirely provided for by other and preferable means. Desirable to But whilo WO are unable to recommend such a me- Strictronuponthod as the above for the introduction of a new class plans of exteu- Qf studonts, we VGuture to press upon general atten- sion. . tion the extreme importance of extending not merely by one hut hy a considerable variety of methods the facilities for becoming Members of the University. We are ourselves attached by every interest and associa- tion to our Colleges no less than to their system ; for we know in how many cases they work admirably well, and should be the last to weaken their influence or Nor to leave positiou. But we at the same time believe it to be *Ae ^rc;«fi«e " iieithor desirable, nor indeed possible, that the present poM^sMon of the QQllgprgs alone, even if they extend themselves, should education of the ° _ "^ . „ , . University. retain any longer exclusive possession of our education, — a privilege which by repressing competition is of no advantage to themselves, which far more than is ne- cessary limits our education to the wealthier classes, and which at once excludes from Oxford many teachers who would impart fresh life and energy to her in- struction, and many pupils whom it has now become absolutely unjust to shut out from her teaching, and who might widely carry her spirit and extend her influence through fresh classes of the community. It is important, in order to view this subject rightly, to keep three things distinct, — the existing Colleges, the general System of Discipline which they represent, and the University. The Colleges we should wish to remain the strongholds of our educational system. But the system itself may well extend beyond them. And it will be a fatal mistake if by narrowing the extension of the University to the extension of the present Colleges alone, we thereby limit and prevent the University herself — which in this matter ought to assert her own distinct existence and powers — from adopting full and adequate means to meet the present demand. The main point on which we wish to insist as a security, and with respect to which we are obliged to differ from her Majesty's Commissioners, is the desira- Necessity of 11 /• •• M Ti.1 i.- allowing great bleness of retainmg over our pupils a direct domestic freedom in the superintendence, our long established principle of disci- Qy^'j^2[„tioQg^ pline. But only let this be secured, and we should be most '^°"^'**^°*^y A •' ' With retainmg unwilling to see it limited to one single exemplification, discipline and 1 Till'. 1 • 1 1 superintend- — rather we should desire it to be carried out by as nu-ance. merous channels as possible, — for no one or two alone can suffice. And therefore we would urge that our new Institutions (for such they would be) should be as va- rious and expansive as possible ; that M^e should begin by enabling such Colleges as desire it to extend their teaching to a larger number of students than they can at present accommodate ; that we should further endeavour to open the advantages of Oxford to some extent to those poorer students who ought (according to the spirit of our statutes), but are now unable, to profit by them ; and finally, that we should enlist more of independent enterprize in the conduct of edu- cation in the University, and by introducing something of competition should stimulate the exertions of the Colleges. All these objects, we believe, might be ef- fected, without forfeiting in any case, what we are especially anxious to preserve, our existing system of discipline and education under personal and direct su- perintendence. It is our belief then that each of the points above 10 alluded to refers to an existing want, susceptible of an effectual remedy. And though we are far from de- nying that to supply this remedy may demand some exertions and sacrifices both from the University and the Colleges, we believe that the need is so real, pressing, and generally felt, as to demand that Oxford should endeavour to meet it with immediate, liberal, and adequate measures. Four plans We Venture to suggest that at least permission recommended. ^ and encouragement should be given to the following modes of extension : (1.) What have been called "Affiliated Halls." (2.) Independent Halls, whether (a) founded by the University, or (b) founded by individuals. (3.) Private Halls, to be opened by any M.A., upon certain conditions, and with the sanction of the Uni- versity. (4.) Halls, or Buildings, which shall simply extend, and form an integral part of, any existing College. 1. "Affiliated 1. By an Affiliated Hall, we mean one built by a College with which it is connected, and where the College contributes from its funds to defray a part of the expenses of the education ; an institution not self- supporting, but assisted, more or less, by its parent society. We think it would be one of the most prac- ticable plans for acting in accordance with the spirit of their foundation, if some of those Colleges which have the means M'ere to establish, and in part support, such Halls. Colleges in the It is Undeniable with regard to almost every College eleemosynary in Oxford that their Fouudors intended them to supply foundations in g^jy^ation to what may be called, in the strictest sense 11 of the words, poor men. The persons to be educated the strictest SGnSG of t;il6 and supported are generally in College Statutes defined word, to be * Pauperes Scholares,' ' Magis Pauperes,' ' Pau- peres ex Eleemosyna viventes,' ' Pauperes et egentes,' ' Sustentatione indigentes.' In a great degree, though not exclusively, almost every, perhaps evevi/. College was intended by its Founder to be an Eleemosynary Foundation. This is no longer the case in any College in Oxford But have now . ,ji'i c • \ \ .IT! ceased to be so. to an extent which can tan-ly be considered ade- quate to the expressed intentions of the Founder. With the exception of a few Bible-Clerkships and some of the closer Scholarships, the education given by Colleges is now mainly for the wealthier classes. We see no fair ground of complaint in this fact. It * has been rendered in great part inevitable and desir- able by the alteration of time and circumstances ; inas- much as the most proper recipients of an University education in the present day belong to that large and comparatively wealthy upper and middle class, which at the time when most of our Colleges were founded had scarcely any existence. It is open however to two remarks : (1) that the present system is a de- parture at least from the letter of Founders' Wills : (2) that it excludes a class, and probably a large class, for whose education there is at present a general de- mand, corresponding to such Founders' injunctions. And this may be stated even more strongly. For The class of not only do the Colleges by the expensive nature of^hom^thcywere their present education exclude the poorer classes from practically ex- their walls, but inasmuch as the only means of entrance ^^^^^^^d from the '' University. to the University is by becoming a member of a Col- lege or Hall, the University herself passes or at least 12 confirms the sentence of exclusion against them. It cannot be matter of surprise that a wish to relax this restriction should be widely felt; and, as some years ago was evidenced by a petition of great importance*, that it should be from time to time strongly expressed throughout the country. Such Halls may Our inference is, that the time is come when the inande/as'^the University and the Colleges of Oxford must do some- SmlttingTt" thing, and make some sacrifices, in order to supply an education on such terms as shall enable a somewhat poorer class to profit by it. It is true that some prac- tical difficulties may seem to obstruct the execution of any plan by which Colleges shall establish Halls for poorer students, and assist them from their own re- sources ; in some cases, from the fact of pecuniary inabi- lity, and in others, because they are already to the full extent of their power engaged in education. But it may be suggested, that in any cases where the funds at the command of a College are large, and where a number of the body are entirely free and qualified to engage in education, such a mode of practically fulfilling one of the great objects of their Founders would at once reflect credit upon themselves and the University, by evidencing an earnest zeal in the cause of education ; and would be the best guarantee to the nation that they are answering the ends of their original insti- tution. Mode of found- If such a College were to build a Hall at its own Halls." expense, letting the rooms at a very moderate price, and contributing towards the salary of a Senior and * The Address on the subject of University Extension signed by Lords Sandon, Ashley, and others, in March 1846, reprinted in Append, to Commissioners' Report, p. 55. 13 Junior Tutor, it has been calculated that, at an ex- pense to itself of 300/. a year, it might educate forty Students at a rate of from 40/. to 45/. a year* : a cal- culation which appears to us reasonable and well founded. These would receive a part of their teaching in the Hall itself, and for the rest might attend the Lectures of the Tutors of the College and the Pro- fessors. They might either attend Service at the Col- lege Chapel, and dine in its Hall, or within their own walls, as might be found most expedient. The Tutors would be appointed by the Head of the College in the usual way, generally perhaps, although not necessarily, from the Fellows of the College : and they would be required to reside within the Hall itself. If such a Hall w^ere instituted, the chief difficulty Possible diffi- in conducting it might be expected to arise from the management, opposite dangers either of the unlimited intercourse of'^^^*"^^"*** its Members with those of the College, or of their occupying an inferior and humiliating position. We cannot but think that these might be easily overcome, if such students were treated by their Tutors at once with care, and at the same time entirely as gentlemen. Whilst, on the other side, if they were chosen origin- ally not merely because poor, but because in spite of their poverty they had already given marks of ability, it is probable that the distinctions they would gain would soon give them an University position in the * See the evidence of the Rev. B.Price, in the Commissioners' Report, Append, p. 66, and of Rev. F. Temple, ibid. p. 127. It is understood that a plan for an affiliated Hall to contain sixty stu- dents at an expense of 60/. per annum each, was submitted to one College early in 1851, to be carried out from its own resources alone. A question however has arisen connected with the interpretation of the Statutes, and the plan is now before the Visitor. 14 eyes of their contemporaries in the Colleges. Without however denying the existence of difficulties, which no plan can wholly avoid, we cannot but regard the great diminution of expense which the above scheme would ensure, as a strong argument in its favour. And, although it is beyond our province to urge its adoption on any particular Colleges, we are of opinion that such a plan, if adopted by any College, — particu- larly by such as may possess large pecuniary resources, and of whose members few or even none may be at present employed directly as teachers, — would greatly promote the interests both of Education and of the Uni- versity. 2. Independent 2. A large Independent Hall unconnected with any Halls. College, while it could hardly offer so cheap an edu- cation as the scheme just discussed, would be free from some objections to which that is liaTale : those, for in- stance, which might arise from the closer contact between the students of the " affiliated" Hall and those of the particular College which had founded it. The experiment This plan has been already very successful at Dur- in the anTio- l^^^i : as may be seen from the following statement of Dm^iam^Uni- ^^^^^' That Uuiversity, for fourteen years, during which versity. time it cousisted of one College, formed exactly after the model of a good existing College at Oxford, remained stationary in numbers, or rather retrograded than pro- gressed. Since 1846, when a change of system was introduced, and a cheaper and stricter Collegiate life attempted in a separate establishment, it has gone on steadily increasing, and well nigh doubled itself in five years. Its connection also extended itself in proportion. Nor did Bishop Hatfield's Hall gain numbers, as some have said, by accommodating local poverty; but, through 15 the public approbation of its system, it carried the Uni- versity into parts of England, and even to places out of England, whence previously students had never come. Its connection after four years was certainly wider than that of the elder College ; although, whilst the elder Col- lege had all the advantages which the powerful connec- tion of its originating and governing body could afford, the later experiment was left very much to such claims as its mere system in itself and its success could present. In four years it was full, its numbers having increased from nineteen, its opening number, to between fifty and sixty: and in 1851, on the determination of the chief authority of the University not to extend the system, it had to refuse twenty applications beyond the annual vacancies.* These facts prove abundantly that extension is de- Additional Co/- manded : and if we remember that both in the case tiorTdemanded just mentioned, and in all other recently established ^^.p.*^^^^*^ «' ' •' opinion. places for Academical education, the plan of life has been more or less Collegiate — in some entirely so — and that in one (University College, London) this mode of life has been supplied as necessary, though no part of, or rather against, the original scheme; it would seem also that ewtension through College membersJiip is de- manded as well f : a remark, the force of which of * This determination was subsequently changed, and a new Hall was opened, at short notice, in t 85 1 . On its first opening all its rooms were taken, and on its being enlarged in 1852 its admissions were immediately doubled. t The value of Collegiate Institutions in all places where young men are congregated has been recognised even by non-Academic bodies. Hence the establishment in the year 1843 of the Queen's College for Medical Students at Birmingham, and the opening about the same time of a Collegiate Institution in connection with St. Bar- tholomew's Hospital. 16 course reaches to "affiliated" as ell as to independent Halls. (a) Proposed (a) It is proposed, then, that the University be asked HaS/tobr^^ to advance, from moneys now in its hands, a sum suffi- foundedbya cieutlv larffo to build and establish such an indepen- grant or a loan jo ^ from the Uni- dent Hall, with accommodation for sixty, or at first for vcrsitv* forty, members. The Hall to be established on the following principles : i. The property to be put under trust for the Uni- versity. ii. The establishment to be self-supporting. iii. The University money so applied to be considered as an investment, and not as a gift ; and interest at the rate of 4 per cent, to be taken. iv. The buildings to be constructed so as to provide a single room for each member, and a large common room or library for the body : all to be furnished in a plain durable style. A suitable suite of rooms to be provided for a Principal, and fitting accommodation for at least two resident Tutors, chapel, dining hall, and offices. V. The scale of expense to be framed with reference to its being self-supporting, and liberal whilst eco- nomical. vi. The mode of life to be that of having all meals in common, the establishment finding all necessaries, and forbidding the introduction of all non-necessaries. vii. The Principal of such Hall to be appointed by the Chancellor. All other appointments to be made by the Principal. viii. The Principal to report annually to the Vice- Chancellor on the numbers and discipline of his So- ciety, and to present a financial statement. 17 The annual charges on the establishment when fully Expense, completed would be : — Rent [assuming 20,000/. expended] . . . £800 Officers [Principal 400/., 2 Tutors 200/. each] 800 Housekeeping 1600 £3200 The income on 60 men at 60/. per ann. The payments to he made at the end of each Term in one sum of 20/ : counting for such purpose the academic year as consisting of three Terms 3600 Balance £400 For these figures we rely upon the experience ac- quired in the management of Hatfield Hall. And assuming the calculation to be (as we think it is) a reasonable one, it would appear, that, if the numbers were full, there would be a surplus. Some balance is necessary for keeping up the property of the establish- ment. But as this expense does not occur for three or four years, the establishment need not start full to insure its pecuniary success. If after all expenses paid, with a fair sum reserved for wear and tear, there were still a surplus, such surplus should be applied in the way of temporary benefactions, or towards reducing the original debt incurred. For endowments, the Hall must rely on benefactions from without itself. In the case of Bishop Hatfield's Hall, Durham, such an appeal was very liberally re- sponded to, even before the Hall was opened. (b.) It might also be an encouragement to private (b.) Liberty of munificence, were it announced, that if i?idividuals \aThlstitvLtio:^<^ should be ready to found a Hall, it might be allowed JglJ^dMduail c 18 to difter from the above, and from existing Halls, in some of the details of its management. For instance, that the Founders should be allowed to nominate the first Principal, with the approbation of the Vice-Chan- cellor and Proctors, or any other board appointed by the University, and to give such rules for the future appointment of the Principal, and management of the Hall, as shall in each case be accepted by the Uni- versity. And that. It may also be a question, how far it might be requi- endowmentis sito that the Complete endowment of such an insti- whoiiy^serared. tutiou should be socured, before its recognition by the University : and whether, to meet the case of an in- complete endoM^ment, the restriction at i^resent im- posed by the Statuta Aularia, limiting the retention of a Fellowship in a College by the Principal of such a Hall to the period of six months, should not be re- laxed. In these and similar variations of detail we wish in general to urge this consideration, that the greater the freedom allowed (under such limitations alone as are necessary to preserve discipline), the greater the prospect of enlisting men of ability and earnestness in the cause, and of ensuring practical results. Economy of the proposed schemes con- siderably greater than at first sight might appear to be the case. The effect of the system thus proposed for a large independent Hall (and let it be observed again, that the argument in all its points may be made to apply with equal force to the "affiliated" Hall) would be, in reality, a very great reduction of expense — a reduc- tion much greater than is seen by merely laying by the side of its estimates a minimum statement of College battels. 19 First, there is the certainty or bona fide character of the cost. A parent wants definitely to know what an University education will require, and by this mode he is provided with full information upon the subject. The uncertain margin is no more uncertain than it is at school or elsewhere, and is calculable : books, clothes, and travelling and personal expenses, though not provided for, need not be unknown quantities. Economy is consulted also through the uniformity of the recurring fixed payments. Many people, and those exactly the persons who would be most likely to embrace such a plan, have income alone to calculate upon, and can meet payments which have the nature of draughts on income, which they could not meet if such demands presumed capital. Another circumstance which would have at least an indirect effect in diminishing expense, is the closer re- lation in which the several members of the Hall would stand to one another. Whilst it would be large enough for freedom, play of character, and esprit de corps, there would be at the same time greater intermixture and more free intercourse between governor and go- verned, than is generally the case in Colleges as they are at present. This, as it would compensate for many of the difficulties incident of course to a stricter system, so must suggest also many ways in which expense would be checked, over and above the mere formal statement of terms. In illustration of this, let the rela- tion of servants and students be considered, as it would or might exist in the kind of Hall here contemplated, compared with that tolerated at present in many Col- leges, where separate interests and rights of perquisite c2 20 militate so much against the possibility of economy, proper subordination, and effective control. For what Such a plan of Collegiate life, whilst it really consults wouM provide. ^^^ ccouomy, docs not pretend to consult for extreme poverty. Neither can extreme poverty be consulted for by any comprehensive Collegiate scheme, except such scheme be simply eleemosynary; nor is it the need which principally demands consideration. The circum- stances and persons for whom such a system would consult, are exactly those for whom academic education is most desirable, and to whose previous mode of life and instruction such education would be the most fitting complement. This can rarely be said for ex- treme poverty ; and when poverty does offer such cases, they, being extraordinary, are to be provided for by extraordinary remedies. It is believed on the same experience which has suggested the plan now recommended, that clergymen, officers of the army and navy, members of the legal and medical profes- sions, and tradesmen who may have acquired means to educate their sons beyond their own social position ; persons to whom 80/. a year is possible, whilst 150/. is not, or is at any rate a heavy sacrifice, and to whom certainty in cost is a great consideration ; would will- ingly send their sons in increased numbers to the University, if an Institution of the kind here recom- mended were open to them. Probability of It is obvious, that tliis scheme for an inde- pendent Hall presumes its finding occupants. In support of such presumption, we appeal to what has been said above with regard to other College esta- blishments without Oxford, and to public opinion otherwise manifested. And we feel justified in as- 21 suming, that the evidence of results, strong as facts prove it to be in ftliese external experiments, would be incalculably^ increased, were Oxford to bring its attractions and associations to bear upon it. And if we look to the sentiments of the public at large, any one who mixes much in society must know, that in many [minds academic reform is narrowed down to this single point. 3. A kind of University Extension in many respects 3. Private Haiis, .1 j,i 1 1 i.'ii -i- under the care Similar to the above may be obtained by permitting of m.a.'s., independent Masters of Arts to open private Halls, ^f^JlJ^^f/j;^ under certain restrictions, without requiring any en- ^"^^^'^^^y- dowment or other security for permanence. Such a plan would;'supply the most ample means which we have hitherto suo-gested for extendinsr the Univer- * sity, since it possesses a freedom both of action and adaptation, which would meet the wants of various classes and individuals, while at the same time it would retain the most essential checks of our discipline. And while the dangers undoubtedly incident to it are not different in kind from those which beset our other educational institutions, its advantages are peculiarly its own. The other plans proposed, desirable as we hold them to be, are still simply extensions of Colleges. This alone gives a place for the emulation of inde- which may be considered in- pendent Establishments. This alone would remove dependent ,,, ,. ^ ' ^ ^ ^ • i ij.1 establishments. that exclusiveness which would in some degree be the result of our education being limited to Colleges, — it would be the means of retaining some of our best teachers within the University, — it would stimulate our whole teaching by the competition of various classes, — and while it would often meet the case of the ex- tremely poor, it would be equally available for young men from the upper classes whose friends might desire for them more complete domestic superintendence. 22 Advocated as In eamestlij pressing this plan upon the notice of all ing adapted to friend s of University Extension, we desire to rest it various wants jjjg^jjjjy upon a principle which it has been our endea- vour constantly to carry out in these suggestions, — the extreme importance of e^iending not merely hy one hut hy a considerable variety of methods the teaching of the University. To apply this fully will alone enable us to bring all our resources, both old and new, into action. And that we shall be able to add many such new resources to our old ones, no one can doubt who considers the improvements likely to be effected among us in their complete form and connexion. A more free election to Fellowships, for example, will probably have the effect of bringing into residence a larger number of persons both capable and desirous of taking part in education. And as it would be scarcely possible to employ alloi these within the Colleges themselves, many of them might be useful in such Halls as we now speak of, — in some of which it is possible that those studies might be best cultivated which are likely to be the least followed out in Colleges. Nor can we doubt that the inducement of such establishments would draw to us much ability /ro^w without. Institutions for almost every kind of education, and for every class, are springing up and still demanded in every part of the country. Can we doubt that the best position for many of these would be Oxford, as the central point, and one which combines the greatest advantages for men of intellectual tastes or educational energy? Increased opportunities for residence, and an increased liberty of teaching in the University, must (it should seem) of necessity both introduce and retain a large amount of talent, emulation and energy, which at present is un- known, lost, or wasted. If we enter further into details, this scheme will offer 23 some advantaofes which are not found in others. It May meet the , , case of the ex- is the merit of that scheme of Her Majesty's Com- tremeiy poor. missioners, which we set aside originally as inad- missible, that it seeks to provide for the case of the extremely poor. For such persons we have not hitherto made any provision. By the plan, however, which we are here recommending, we believe that they could be provided for, in all that respects eco- nomy, to the full as well as by the scheme of the Commissioners ; while they would retain (what in that scheme they are deprived of) the invaluable advantage of direct personal superintendence and discipline. It is surely no inconceivable case that Masters of Arts might be found, possessed of private means*, who would undertake, as a work of charity, the education of a small number of extremely poor men, making httle or absolutely no profit from them. And this would not only be the case in houses opened exclusively for the poor, but also, possibly, to some extent in those where the majority of the students were of a richer class. The purely domestic arrangements of such an establish- ment would admit of every consideration being paid to the circumstances of all its members ; and an economy would be possible under such a system which could never be attained under the more general and unbend- ing law of a Collegiate Rule. Again, it is clear that many parents are deterred from other classes sending their sons to Oxford, either by a general dislike whUmThey to removing young men out of the sphere of domestic ^"'^ ^^°^ ^' influence, or by a special conviction of the unfitness of their own sons for the ordinary Collegiate life. Many circumstances, health, character, bodily or mental in- * The repeal of the clause in the Statuta Aularia before men- tioned would of course facilitate the foundation of this as well as of other kinds of Halls dependent upon individuals for funds. 24 firmity, may render a person unfit to become a Member of a large Hall or College, wbicb would not disqualify him from pursuing bis studies with advantage in a private Hall or House, under domestic superintendence. Further, it may be questioned whether the disinclina- tion which exists on the part of a considerable portion of the upper classes to send their sons to Oxford does not arise in some measure from the high value which they set upon domestic influences, and the fear which they entertain of placing young persons beyond their control. Education by Private Tutors is still largely resorted to by the Nobility and wealthier gentry ; and the same reasons which deter such persons from placing their boys at the Public Schools, cause them to shrink from committing them to the mixed society and some- what trying independence of a College. For such cases the institution of Private Halls, which would be opened, perhaps generally, by married Masters of Arts, would seem alone capable of providing: and we cannot but think that to permit them would be desirable, even if no further benefit were to be looked for from so doing. Securities for the proper ap- pointment of the Heads of such Halls. The chief, indeed the only peculiar, difficulty which attaches to the establishment of such Pri- vate Halls is to secure the appointment of none but fitting persons to be their Heads. With this ob- ject we propose that no M. A. shall be entitled to open such Private Hall, unless he shall have resided continuously in the University for one previous year, shall produce testimonials of character from his Col- lege, and shall obtain the license of the Vice- Chancellor and Proctors, or of some other Board ap- pointed by the University for the purpose. He should also, we think, be required to give sufficient guarantee that his pupils shall be enabled to keep all requisite Terms, and otherwise comply with the rules of the 25 University. We recommend his receiving testimonials from his College, and not license, for the following reason ; because we are of opinion that this plan would require two different safeguards ; — the one, that the license of the University should only be given with great care, and that it should be recalled upon any manifest defects of discipline ; the other, that it should be in no respect arbitrary, or left to the caprice of a College, which from some objection to this kind of education might decline to license an M. A. whose claims were sufficient to give him a fair title to the privilege. We might also trust that Colleges would feel their deep responsibility in giving testimonials of fitness for so important an office as that of the Head of such an educational establishment, and would not lightly or on wrong grounds confer, or help to confer, • on persons not really qualified so high and honourable a position. An objection has been made that a very limited Objection to /., ,. Ill ^' ^ • XX 11 them answered. amount or teachmg would be supplied in a Hall con- ducted by a single person. But, — without dwelling on the probability of an increased amount of University teaching, — it would obviously be in the power of the Principals of various private Halls to combine for the purposes of instruction, and thus to offer their pupils the same advantages, with respect to the number of Tutors and variety of Lectures, as those at present enjoyed in Colleges. We have only further to remark upon this head. Checks to be that we would give to the Board which has the licens-them. ing of these Halls, the right of closing them at three months' notice, due provision being made for the trans- ference of the students to some other establishment : and that we would require the Heads of them to send 26 in Terminally to the Vice-Chancellor an exact state- ment of the numbers and discipline of their Halls, and the academic progress of their students. We should also think it of importance that migration from an- other Society to a Private Hall should be absolutely forbidden, unless in cases of poverty, to be certified by the Head of such Society. Effect of them It is an additional recommendation of this scheme, in retaining distinguishe men in the disthiguishtd that it would be likely to retain in the University University. many distinguished men, who now leave it to find em- ployment elsewhere. If it be said, that it would like- wise retain undesirable men, we admit the objection to have force ; but we should look confidently to see such cases immensely overbalanced by those of an oppo- site character. We believe that the good sense and care of parents, the feeling of responsibility in Colleges, and the watchfulness of the University, would tend to render the evil, which might thus find entrance, incon- siderable. 4. Extension of 4. We pass from the scheme which diverges most existing Col- • i 1 /. . , . , . leges by the Widely irom our present practice, to one which is a addition of de- i j_/>-i -Trii • ^ ' j.' r^i tached buUd- mere enlargement or it ; viz. iLiXtension or existing Col- ings. leges by allowing them to lodge their Students in de- tached houses. We are of opinion then, in the fourth and last place, — That permission should be given to all Colleges to extend themselves by lodging their Undergraduate Members in buildings detached from the College, under the superintendence of a Graduate Fellow, or of a Mas- ter of Arts ; the buildings so used to be licensed by the Vice-Chancellor and Proctors, and the Vice-Chan cellor and Proctors to have power, conjointly, to with- draw the license at (say) three months' notice. 1- 27 We regard this plan as far from adequately meeting Advantages of the wants of the University. It is obvious, for iustance, that it does not fully, although it may partially, open our doors to a poorer class of Students. But it never- theless combines a number of important advantages. These are chiefly, (i.) the facility of such an alteration, and the certainty that it would be immediately acted upon ; (ii.) the small risk and slight outlay at which the experiment could be tried ; (iii.) the elasticity of the system ; and (iv.) the variety and power of adapta- tion to circumstances of which it admits. i. It is plain that immediately upon the removal of Facility of cai-- the existing restrictions, several of the Colleges might exertion. greatly enlarge their numbers, by taking houses in the town, and filling them with Undergraduates. There is • a pressure upon the best Colleges, and this, notwith- standing, or rather in consequence of, the higher standard of their admission examinations, causing them to be over-full, and quite sufficient to enable them, besides filling their rooms, to throw out one or more such establishments as are here recommended, without (as we believe) seriously diminishing the number of Undergraduates in other Colleges. It is believed that certain Colleges are prepared, the moment liberty is granted them, to try this plan, which could thus be brought into play in the very Term after the alteration was conceded. This would of course be more difficult in the case of the Independent or the Affiliated Halls, where a large edifice has to be built for the new Students. ii. The outlay of the College thus extending itselfTheinconsider- would be inconsiderable. Colleges might even rentqvured. houses hy the year, so that (if the experiment failed entirely) a year's rent would be the entire sacrifice. 28 Besides, Colleges would be able to see tlieir way with tolerable clearness, and could scarcely make any great mistake as to the number on which they might calcu- late for one year in advance. Such a plan iii. This system possesses a great degree of elas- andaseasiV^'ticity. Nothing could be more easy than to extend laid aside. ^^. (.q^^^-j.^^.^ ^ College rapidly by this plan. As Stu- dents thronged to it a College would take more houses, as they fell off it would give them up. Colleges would feel that they had a fair field before them, and that they might adventure boldly, because it would be so easy to draw back and stop in time. Its applicability iv. The plan admits of ready adaptation to a variety to a variety of /^ n • i i cii-cumstauces. of circumstauces. At one time a College might have, as some Colleges are known to have, a number of Students with small means, supported by their friends with great difficulty at the University, who would gladly submit to a stricter discipline and severer rules with respect to meals, hours, entertainments, and the like, if they could thereby live at a less cost. At an- other time additional space might be all that was needed, and the men sent out of College might be placed on exactly the same footing as those within the walls. Again, the men at present sent out after their twelfth term to find lodgings where they please in the town might be collected into such houses; in which Bachelors of Arts also might be required to reside during any time that they might spend in Oxford be- tween the B.A. and the M.A. degree: in both cases, to the manifest improvement of University and College discipline, in quarters which it is now inadequate to reach. Other cases might be mentioned, if it were desirable to enter further into particulars. 29 Additional arguments will readily occur in support of this plan. First, it is one probable result of impending changes, Employment of to which we have already alluded, that the entire non-ofretuentFei- residence of Fellows will become far less frequent ^°''^^' than it is at present. If this is to be the case, it is important to provide work for that larger number of Fellows who may be expected at any one time to be resident in Oxford. The superintendence of such houses might furnish them with useful and appropriate occupation. Secondly, this scheme, being a mere extension of Such a scheme , . f, f, . ■, . , readily incor- the present system, is tree from various objections porated with which may be thought to lie, though not (as we con- gyg^em.^^'^ ceive) with justice, against other modes of extending the University. The position both of the Undergra- duates thus added to the Colleges, and of the superin- tending Fellows or Masters of Arts, would be, from the first, clear and ascertained. The superintendents would be a mere addition to the internal staff of their College, would receive their appointment in the same way, and would in all respects rank with College Tu- tors ; while the Undergraduates would be bond fide members of the College, under the same regimen and discipline, enjoying the use of the College Chapel, Hall, Library, and Lectures, and associating with the other members of the College more or less as might be thought desirable. We believe that no social barrier would be raised between such members of a College and those living inside the walls, but that, while inter- course would be in some degree checked, a thoroughly friendly feeling would exist between the two classes of students. 30 It would be a Should it be said, that the adoption of this plan rea^ extension itt • -i oftheUniver- would not lead to any real University extension, but ^' ^* only to a change in the distribution of the existing students, who would be attracted in greater numbers to particular Colleges, we think it sufficient to reply — first, that if the case were so, it would not be con- clusive against the scheme, since it is plainly " desir- able that as many persons as possible should be ad- mitted to the benefit of the education which is imparted in the best-conducted Colleges." Justice to our stu- dents demands no less. And other Colleges would gain rather than lose by the change ; if any real or expected diminution in their numbers led them to con- sider the possible need of improvement. Further, it is our conviction that University extension would in reality be greatly promoted by this as by the other plans here advocated. Many students are lost to Ox- ford altogether, by the difficulty of entering them upon short notice at the College which they prefer. And the great power of adaptation mentioned above would enable Colleges to attract different classes of students, by varying the system of discipline and education in their several detached houses to suit their peculiar needs. It would react Lastly, we think it worth while to notice the pro- upon the Col- bability, that such off-shoots from the Colleges, whe- leges them- ^|^gj, jjj ^j^g f^^.^^ ^f a affiliated" or of simply additional selves. ^ J Halls, would react favourably upon the parent body. Plans found to answer in the smaller society would often be adopted in the larger. Experiments could - readily be tried in new bodies, and upon a small scale, which the great risk deters even the boldest persons from making upon Colleges. The range of practical experience would be greatly increased, and it seems not too much to expect that modes of living might 31 spread from the out-College students to those inside the walls, tending very much to the advantage of the latter. Such are the plans of University Extension, which Summary. we are prepared to recommend. A review of them will shew — 1. That in each the principle of domestic and per- sonal superintendence by recognised Tutors is carefully preserved : or rather we may say, is enforced and strengthened by the closer intercourse between Tutor and pupil, for which each plan provides. 2. That the practicability of each scheme, where it is not self-evident (as in the third and fourth cases), rests upon the calculations of experienced persons, who have either been actually engaged in similar and successful undertakings elsewhere, or have had prac- tical experience both of the University itself, and of students of other classes than those usually found in Oxford as it now is, or have made the subject their peculiar study. 3. That while the last two plans recommended may jjlainly be made not only self-supporting but pro- fitable, and involve the least conceivable outlay of capital, and scarcely any risk of loss, we are, in the first and second of our recommendations, simply call- ing upon educational institutions (for such they are in fact) to employ surplus funds, where they exist, for educational purposes : and calling upon them, in the second of the two, not to sink those funds, but to invest them, and in a speculation, which bids fair to be, if not 32 a profitable, yet at the worst not a losing one, even on the narrow view of mere pecuniary profit. Let it be noticed too, that one only of the plans re- commended, viz. the Independent Hall, involves even a loan of money from the University : and that, while any feasible plan earnestly and practically put forward would doubtless be met by liberal subscriptions from without the University, it is the fact that subscriptions to a large amount have actually been tendered in past years towards the foundation of an Independent Hall. But while thus maintaining the practicability of each of our recommendations, and the harmony of each of them with our existing system, we must earnestly insist upon the expediency of permitting all. No one of them by itself would meet our wants. Each adapts itself to a particular class of students, for which the others would not suffice. This is obvious, if we regard simply the question of expense. By the fourth plan we render the University acces- sible to an increased number of the wealthier class, who are kept from us now, not by pecuniary consider- ations, but by the difficulty of gaining admission into the College which they prefer. By the same plan we admit also, in larger numbers and with greater comfort, those who, upon an allow- ance of (say) 150/. and under, now live with difficulty and self-denial in our existing Colleges. By the plan of Independent Halls we include per- sons whose utmost income amounts to 80/. or 90/. per 33 annum : and wlio at present, if they can contrive to get through the University at all, do so at the cost of a self-denial so unremitting and intense, that we may fairly pronounce it as a general rule impossible. By the plan of "Affiliated" Halls we extend our limit still lower, to an income of 60/. or 70/. By the plan of private Halls opened by individual M. A.'s, we extend the limit to a still lower level of expense, either by giving facilities for private be- neficence, or by enabling students of humble means to frame their mode of life upon the narrowest possi- ble standard of economy to which they themselves may choose to submit. But we do not rest the question upon grounds of economy only. The nation has increased : the edu- cated portion of the nation has increased in a far higher ratio : the University alone has remained com- paratively stationary. Other classes and professions be- sides the wealthier gentry and the clergy take a lead in society, enter into the governing body of the coun- try, need, and we believe may easily be brought to desire, an University education. There is an increas- ing demand for additional clergy : and an increasing class of persons fit to supply that demand. For the reception of these classes the University has very in- adequately provided : some are virtually excluded from her walls : and other bodies have stepped in to fill up with an inferior education the place which duty and interest alike entitle her to occupy. The nature of our educational system has been one cause of this. The certainty of expense and the undefined fear of extravagance, together with our inability to expand D 3^ and adapt the economy of our system, have assuredly been another. We have taken steps to remove the former objection. We are now suggesting means for removing the latter. With every advantage of posi- tion, ancient tradition, wide-spread influence, powerful foundations, the University seems to us imperatively called upon to take immediate steps to secure that place at the head of the Church education of the country, which is hers by inheritance, hers by the purpose of her founders, hers hitherto by the consent of the country at large, but which proved fitness, and enlarged and generous efforts, will alone enable her long to retain. i'®^ '. n #i<^ i^\ H % ff jmyK/ 4 >i L :?%f^ '^V -^ #1 -~3r -^'.9» ^?