973.7L63 Hertz, Emanuel Abraham Lincoln at the climax of the great Lincoln. Douglas jo» nt debate in Gajesburg, I II i nois LINCOLN ROOM UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY MEMORIAL the Class of 1901 founded by HARLAN HOYT HORNER and HENRIETTA CALHOUN HORNER ABRAHAM LINCOLN AT THE CLIMAX OF THE GREAT LINCOLN-DOUGLAS JOINT DEBATE IN GALESBURG, ILLINOIS By EMANUEL HERTZ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/abrahamlincolnatOOhert ABRAHAM LINCOLN AT THE CLIMAX OF THE GREAT LINCOLN-DOUGLAS JOINT DEBATE IN GALESBURG, ILLINOIS Delivered at Galesburg, Illinois, on the 6th day of October, 1928, on the 70th Anniversary of the Lincoln-Douglas Debate, from a platform erected on the spot where the original debate was held — upon the Campus of . . . Knox College. By EMANUEL HERTZ of New York City Dedicated to the President, Trustees, Professors, Teachers and Students of Knox College, who are carrying the burning torch which jell from the lifeless hands of Abraham Lincoln — steady and high — and who will see to it that this torch remains lighted — when the race is won — ivhen the final goal shall have been reached — the final victorious battle fought — and the great consummation attained — ivhen justice will flow like water over the land — with education for all, the world at peace, universal brotherhood no longer a dream but a reality, and poverty and disease banished from the land — when all men ivill devoutly acknowledge that the Lord is 07ie and His name, one. The Author. C4- H44-*.lr ABRAHAM LINCOLN THE CLIMAX OF THE GREAT LINCOLN - DOUGLAS JOINT DEBATE GALESBURG, ILLINOIS Delivered by Emanuel Hertz TTISTORIANS have been unkind to Abraham Lincoln in more than -*■ •* one respect, particularly as to his part in the famous joint debates with Douglas. He who was the embodiment of truth, who hated exaggeration, who never suppressed facts, — he who never spoke unless he had all the facts, and when he had them, spoke in a matter that an entire country could hear and read and understand — now suffers and is still misunderstood by reason of the absence of material facts which would throw light on his career and on his epoch-making acts and statements. The facts are in existence, but are being hidden by men and women, who want these data for themselves ; or by others who for purely commercial reasons, conceal priceless letters and documents which rightfully belong to the world. The Lincoln of the joint debates has never been thoroughly written up by anyone, nor has he received full justice for his great contribution to the Constitutional discussions which went far to settle the most important problem since 1789. The one great historian who attempted it passed to his eternal reward while writing of the Quincy debate and before the text in reference to the Alton debate was properly prepared — and before the great summary which Beveridge would have written of all the seven debates was even thought of — when the pen fell from his lifeless hands. The adequate and definitive treatment of Lincoln's great adventure, the Presidency, is still awaiting the great historian whc will give a lifetime to the task. In the meanwhile precious time is fleeting, irreplaceable material is disappearing, newspaper files are falling apart — those not destroyed by fire — and a fire seems ever to be pursuing this priceless Lincoln material — and successive complacent Congresses seem to be satisfied with the pile of stone on the Potomac — as the last word of a Lincoln monument. Let us again go to the South and copy the manner of 5 making safe the historical facts surrounding that God-sent messenger to preserve our nation even as they have done for his opponent — who comes as near vindication as he ever can be vindicated — in a final and definitive edition of his complete works — from which nothing is with- held. The entire Southland helped to make the compilation complete. Here at Galesburg seventy years ago tomorrow, Lincoln began on his victorious march, which was as certain as the progress of the suns. At Ottowa, at Freeport, at Charleston, at Jonesboro — he had but measured his opponent ; he who had read every word which Douglas had spoken on the stump, in the House of Representatives, while on the Illinois Supreme Court bench — and knew what the Judge would say, and how he would say it — during these four preliminary debates Lincoln simply drove Douglas into position. After the opening state- ment, Douglas never again spoke as he intended to speak. Lincoln, who followed with an hour and a half's address, and on every other occasion, said something which irritated and angered the Judge, and made him forget what he intended and planned to say — in thus attempt- ing to attend to Lincoln's last irritating and provoking statement. Douglas had evidently carefully prepared a continuous oration to be delivered in the style of the period, which he intended to deliver in certain sections at the different debates. He had taken four opening addresses and four closing addresses, thus leaving Lincoln four one- hour and a half addresses, which Lincoln, used relentlessly and inex- orably. Here at Galesburg his first highly sustained address showed not only that he had taken Douglas' full measure, but that his cause had nothing to fear from that quarter. Never after that day at Gales- burg does he condescend to follow or pay but passing attention to the irritated and angered Douglas. Here he reached the high water mark of his career up to that time, and never really spoke in the same manner during the entire debate, either before or after, excepting only at Alton, where he spoke his final message as one inspired. He mildly reminds Douglas at Ouincy : Does he not know, does he not appre- ciate, the great drama that was even then being enacted? Will he persist in petty quarrelling and quibbling, he, the great Douglas, the undisputed leader of the Democracy? Will he not rise to the great occasion? Will he persist in the childish repetition of futile charges and insinuations in practically the same words as he began, as he used in the speeches in Chicago and on the stump during the times between the several debates? Has he but one piece to declaim? Will he not cease threatening Lincoln — Lincoln, who could not be threatened, Lincoln, who knew no fear? Will he not stop calling this one or that one — "liar" after he had demonstrated a proposition, even as Euclid did, that the three angles of a triangle equalled two right angles? Would he call Euclid a liar by way of refuting that self-evident proposition ? Examine that marvelous record and you see that Lincoln never overlooked anything Judge Douglas said or asked or charged. He had the text as reported, compared it with his opponent's statement, which was ever the same, and in passing replied to every statement he con- sidered deserving of reply. "Could not Lincoln make the same speech and stick to the same speech, as he did — using the same phraseology?" He (Douglas) talked the same way, said the same things in Ottowa and in Galesburg, in Freeport and in Quincy, in Charleston and in Alton. Lincoln ever said some other thing except the one wanted by Judge Douglas. Lincoln never answered his questions at the time the Judge wanted them answered. Lincoln persisted in writing down questions and writing down answers, and read them when thus in juxtaposition. Lincoln persisted in having printed statements, extracts, decisions with him in his pockets all the time, and ever asked "Put your finger on the spot," when a quotation was inaccurate or false or only partly quoted — or misquoted. Douglas had a great deal of satisfaction in sneering at Lincoln's "spot" resolutions and raised many a laugh from his de- voted followers. But Lincoln's mastery of his argument against slavery from the day the first slavery legislation was enacted until the moment he opened his mouth in Galesburg, had never been equalled by any other man on the continent. He knew every phase of his subject. He knew every idea promulgated by the friends of slavery and by the friends of freedom, and had the quotation or the legislation or the speech under discussion with him. He knew what the fathers and founders had said, and quoted from them in confounding Douglas when he attempted to distort or misquote them. "You say Jefferson favored slavery, Judge Douglas? He did not," he said, in speaking of slavery, "he trembled for his country when he remembered that God was just." "Do you say, Judge Douglas, that the negroes are not included in the Declaration of Independence?" "I believe the entire records of the world, from the date of the Declaration of Independence up to within three years ago, may be searched in vain for one single affirmation, from one single man, who said that the negro was not included in the Declaration of Independ- ence; I think I may defy Judge Douglas to show that he ever said so, that Washington ever said so, that any President ever said so, that any living man upon the whole earth ever said so, until the necessities of the present policy of the Democratic party, in regard to slavery, had to invent that affirmation." "Are you relying upon that great Commoner, Henry Clay — are you actually affirming that Henry Clay has inspired you — and that you are but carrying out Henry Clay's beliefs and policies as to Slavery? Hear what Mr. Clay had to say when he was once answering an objec- tion to the Colonization Society, that it had a tendency to the ultimate emancipation of the slaves — Clay said that 'those who would repress all tendencies to liberty and ultimate emancipation must do more than put down the benevolent efforts of the Colonization Society, — they must go back to the era of our liberty and independence, and muzzle the cannon that thunders its annual joyous return; they must blot out the moral lights around us ; they must penetrate the human soul, and eradicate the light of reason and the love of liberty.' And I do think," says Lincoln, "I repeat — that Judge Douglas, and whoever, like him, teaches that the negro has no share, humble though it may be, in the Declaration of Independence, is going back to the era of our liberty and independence, and, so far as in him lies, is muzzling the cannon that thunders its annual joyous return; that he is blowing out the moral lights around us, when he contends that whoever wants slaves has a right to hold them; that he is penetrating, so far as lies in his power, the human soul, and eradicating the light of reason and the love of liberty, when he is in every possible way preparing the public mind, by his vast influence, for making the institution of slavery perpetual and national." He knew all the legislation beginning with the ordinance of '87, when and where the whole trouble began. He followed the evolution of the whole dismal national tragedy until he brought it down to the date of the debates. And when the two champions appeared at Ottowa for the first time, we witness upon that great stage upon which were riveted the eyes of the whole country, the champion of slavery, and the champion of freedom. Douglas unquestionably represented the side of slavery, Lincoln unquestionably represented the side of freedom — Douglas, fresh from his triumphs in the United States Senate where he gradually but inevitably took the place of Webster, of Clay, of Benton, yea, even of Calhoun. In that same United States Senate which had witnessed some of the greatest of our national gladiators 8 constructing, reinforcing and strengthening the beams of the Union, Stephen A. Douglas appeared as the most remarkable and fearless debater and legislator of that day and generation. Fearless he was, like Randolph of Virginia, and Clay of Kentucky; eloquent he was, like Corwin and Yancey; learned he was, like some of the greatest scholars who preceded him in that forum which in that era had wit- nessed the appearance of practically all the great constitutional scholars of their day. With all that prestige, fresh from defeating the then president of the United States on the Kansas legislation, the undisputed orator and spokesman of the Democracy, the inevitable nominee of his party for the Presidency in the forthcoming National election, travelling in state in a manner never equalled by any other candidate, he reached Ottowa, the locality where the first joint debate was launched. Opposed to him was he who was commonly known as the most often-defeated and disappointed candidate for office, a man who had surmounted troubles innumerable from the days of his childhood, a man upon whom the burdens of life had fallen so heavily that he never reached the calm, the sunshine, the conviviality, the proud posi- tion of his more successful and fortunate opponent. By some strange irony of fate, humble Abe Lincoln was picked out to oppose the con- quering Douglas, who up to that day practically knew no defeat. No poorer choice could have been made, was the opinion of almost every- one who watched the two gladiators upon that memorable stage. How could Abraham Lincoln hope to defeat Douglas, or even to cope with Douglas ? How could the man with the single term in Congress, driven from public life — as he was often reminded by Douglas for taking the unpopular side of the Mexican war, and looking with disfavor upon the Administration which plunged us into it, and practically forgotten, how could he cope with the State Legislator, the nationally known advocate, the Supreme Court Judge, the Congressman, the United States Senator, the inevitable Democratic nominee for the Presidency? But fortune had played the young Republican party many a trick, and this was evidently but another; to be actually represented in the great State of Illinois, opposing the greatest speaker of his day and gen- eration, by poor Abe Lincoln, the man of yarns, the plodding country lawyer, the ill-clad, ill-dressed, ill-appearing farm hand and rail splitter ! Will the new Republican party ever come into its own — after Fremont — Lincoln? Still, the time for retracing their steps was gone. There they were, confronting each other and as usual, with the hard luck of the Republican party, Douglas had to begin — to deliver the first blow. Douglas would also close the seventh and last joint debate, and so would first hem in Lincoln on every side and finally deliver the coup-de-grace. Douglas was the beginning and Douglas was to be the end of the epoch-making and fatal performance. He had the first as well as the last word — what hope was there then for Lincoln? But under that crude exterior, behind that care worn, sombre, sad-featured visage, underneath his homely clothes, under that high, out-of-date hat, was the most original human being who was born in America since that first day upon which that Genoese dreamer-sailor first saw land. Here was a man who was born and brought up in the great open spaces, in the great deserts of the young Republic, even as was his prototype in Egypt, four thousand years ago. Here was the gnarled, rugged oak, weatherbeaten and scarred, subjected to snow and storm and sleet, to heat, to thunder and to hurricane. There he stood, like the monarch of the forest, defying the inclemencies of the weather and of the seasons, and still remaining supreme — calm, serene, confident, right — eternally right. Douglas spoke his piece as it had been prepared, as it had been spoken from a score of other platforms, and consequently with but little conviction; always the same platitudes, the same simple story of how the conspiracy was hatched between Trumbull and Lincoln, the one to steal renegade Democrats and baptize them into Abolitionism, and the other to steal Whigs and baptize them into Abolitionism, and thus re-enforce the Republican party and hostile Buchanan office holders, all for the purpose of defeating him — Douglas — who had brought forward the only real constructive legislation, who had invented the only nostrum which would answer all questions and solve all prob- lems, including the never heretofore solved slavery problem — popular sovereignty. And the Judge concluded his statement by asking Lincoln seven questions, which he insisted that he answer forthwith in order to rivet Lincoln to his chariot — he, Douglas, was going to conduct this joint debate. Lincoln delivered his first hour and a half address without paying much attention to the fact that Douglas existed. Douglas' remaining half hour was, therefore, full of irritation and anger and disappointment that Lincoln did not refer to his questions, that he was evidently afraid to answer his questions, because Lincoln knew that he, Judge Douglas, would trot him down to Egypt, or to some other place, where he would not dare to make the same speech that he made at Ottowa. And so the irritable, angered and excited Douglas kept it up until 10 they came to Galesburg, and here Lincoln delivered his hour and a half talk, carefully prepared and thought out during practically an entire lifetime, and from that moment on, until his second inaugural, six years later, Lincoln kept steadily climbing and growing, until his entire life work blossomed out like a great constellation, and became visible to all men from the altitude he had attained on the day he delivered his immortal Second Inaugural. Galesburg marked the turning point of Lincoln's career ; the Gales- burg, Quincy, and Alton addresses were but three portions of a great oration, of a great argument, before the greatest assizes that ever were assembled at any time, where he pleaded and argued for the life of the nation, for the liberty of a race, for the triumph of eternal principles. Douglas kept repeating charges of conspiracy between Trumbull and Lincoln, imaginary inaccuracies between different statements of Lincoln and Trumbull — kept on harping on the fact that Lincoln would not dare to talk in Egypt as he talked in Chicago. He became suffi- ciently petty to refer to the appearance of Fred Douglas with one of Lincoln's friends in the outskirts of the crowd of one of the joint debates — thus emphasizing his charge that Lincoln was for absolute equality between the races. Hear what Lincoln said in a hitherto unpublished memorandum — which he carried with him during the joint debates : "Negro equality! Fudge!! How long, in the government of a God, great enough to make and maintain this Universe, shall there continue' knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagoguism as this?" If you compare the eleven addresses of Douglas delivered from the opening at Ottowa to the closing at Alton, and boil them down, you will find practically the same words and phrases and similies. If you will do the same thing to the ten addresses of Lincoln, you will find one connected, finely woven, argument, consistent, continuous, logical, irresistible in its force, which represented the entire political creed and philosophy of Abraham Lincoln with reference to the fundamental principles upon which rested the American Union. In it you will find everything that constitutes the cardinal principles upon which our Con- stitution rests, which the Declaration of Independence stands for, and which every good man and true throughout the history of the Union who ever stood for Union, for Liberty, for Justice and for Right has 11 uttered in one form or another. In it you will find the great heart and soul of Lincoln, throbbing and beating for the love of his country, for the love of his fellowmen. In it you will find the ripest wisdom, the soundest philosophy, which is as true today as it was on the day it was uttered, and which will remain true for all time to come. He demonstrated with the exactness and definiteness and lucidity of a geometrical proposition, that the Dred Scott decision was the result of political considerations and conferences by conspirators he chose to designate under transparent names such as Stephen, Roger, Franklin and James — and he further demonstrated by a chain of historical events absolutely incontrovertible, that the fathers and founders had acted and legislated in reference to the hateful institution with the sole object of looking to its ultimate extinction. Just listen to what he says in a hitherto unpublished memorandum and which he had with him during the joint debates : 'The effort to prove that our fathers who framed the government under which we live, understood that a proper division of local from federal authority, and sound provision of the Constitution, both forbid the federal government to control slavery in the federal territory, is as if, when a man stands before you, so that you see him, and lay your hand upon him, you should go about examining his tracks, and insisting therefore, that he is not present, but somewhere else — They did, through the federal government, control slavery in the federal territory — They did the identical thing which Douglas insists they understood they ought not to do." Against these two propositions Douglas made no headway — history was against him — the new world order was against him — the very stars in their courses fought against him. One cannot help feeling, in view of Judge Douglas' great abilities and demonstrated capacity for legal argument for joint debate, for political discussion and acumen — one cannot help thinking that he began to suspect, after he listened to Lincoln, that he might be on the wrong side of that great question, because Lincoln demonstrated be- yond the peradventure of a doubt that his own nostrum of popular sovereignty was not sound, could not be sound, and unless Euclid was a liar, Judge Douglas knew that his argument was false and was a mere gossamer of sand, to fall apart upon the slightest collision with justice and with right and with sound reasoning. Upon no other theory can one explain the ever-growing weakness of Judge Douglas' 12 attack. He who had successfully fought with the leaders of his party, he who had successfully fought to a standstill men like Seward, and Sumner, and Chase, and Wade, in the United States Senate, a man who could tell an unruly and a fault finding and defiant audience of twenty thousand Chicagoans — which declined to hear his justification for the repeal of the Missouri Compromise — a few minutes before twelve o'clock on the Saturday night when he returned to Chicago two years before : "Fellow citizens of Chicago : It is now twelve o'clock Saturday night. I am going to church tomorrow, and you can go to Hell," — that man certainly was not afraid of Lincoln nor the audiences which he faced; but he was beginning to fear that he was not standing upon firm ground, and that the earth, so to speak, was breaking under him — there seems to be no doubt that he was himself convinced by Lincoln's inexorable logic. But as Lincoln says in still another hitherto unpublished memorandum — "He (Douglas) never lets the logic of principle displace the logic of success." All honour to Galesburg, where this great work began ! At Gales- burg it was where Lincoln began his career of leadership triumphant. At Galesburg it was where he definitely and clearly convinced even Douglas that his cause, Lincoln's cause, was just, and that there was only one answer to the question which they were debating. Douglas was happy, as happy as he could be, that the contest closed, he was beaten to a standstill — tired and exhausted, and Lincoln stood pre- pared to continue — he could not be tired out in this fight. At the beginning he had a premonition that Lincoln was a dangerous opponent. His premonition turned out to be true. His fears were more than justified, his expectations realized. Lincoln spoke from the first moment like a man who knew of no opponent, like a man who spoke to an entire people, like an inspired prophet of an inspired cause. It was not the same Lincoln whom Douglas had met in Congress, whom Douglas had met in their trips through the Eighth Circuit, or at the various functions in Springfield and in other parts of Illinois. It was the God-inspired, the God-intoxicated soul, picked by an inscrutable Providence to perform a task under which had stumbled and fallen the leaders of a quarter of a century. A new man had arisen on the plains of Illinois who, when he spoke up, had an entire nation listening, contemplating, meditating, reasoning, and finally, when Father Abraham called, an entire nation responded : "We are coming, Father Abraham, five hundred thousand strong." From day to day the number of those who were privileged to see that form, to hear that voice of this 19th century prophet, is getting 13 smaller. Nay even the number of those who followed his remains to his last resting place are passing to the Beyond and joining him among the heavenly hosts where abide all good men and true. We cannot see the glory that they saw, we cannot hear the voice they heard, but the message which he brought to them has become our heritage and our paramount duty to transmit unsullied even as it has been transmitted to us. Why then cannot we here resolve — seventy years later — that he shall not have lived and labored and died in vain ? Why cannot we here determine — under God — to battle against the modern misguided enemies of our union — the Douglas of today and of tomorrow — for in one guise or another he appears and reappears in each generation — ever falsely proclaiming that his mission is their mission in his frantic desire to attain leadership in our National Councils. Why can we not, why do we not, decide and determine to drive them from political life even as did Lincoln drive out Douglas and his associates? To his glory be it said^ Douglas at last saw the light — saw that his whole life had been barren, wasted, and returned. But others never see the light and never return. There then is the enemy. Let us not be blinded by minor matters magnified for the purpose of blinding the people and diverting their attention from the frightful possibilities and calamitous results if and when our government is taken out of the hands of the followers of Lincoln and entrusted into the hands of his enemies and detractors. This country must continue in the spirit and under the guidance of the eternal principles laid down in Lincoln's charter of liberties committed to our care; and like the Holy of Holies, it must be guarded with our very lives. That much we of our generation can do, and with God's help will do. This is our paramount daily task. No strange fires must be permitted on our national altar — death was the penalty for Aaron's disobedient sons, who sought to introduce it — in defiance of Moses and Aaron whom they sought to displace. Death of Lincoln's government of the people will be our penalty should we permit the undermining, the desecration, the uprooting of our form of government at the hands of the vandal, the communist, the unholy alliances of evil, of disloyalty, of hypocrisy, and of all those hosts who have no truth in them, who falsify issues even as they falsify their intentions. May He, in whose eyes a thousand years are but a moment, and who brought us through the successive ordeals of Revolution and Civil War, save us and keep us in all these succeeding trials and tests. The omnipresent spirit of Lincoln will guard us, intervene for us, plead for us and protect us — Our Heavenly Guardian slumbereth not and sleepeth not ! 14 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-URBANA 973 7L63C4H44AB C 001 ABRAHAM LINCOLN AT THE CLIMAX OF THE GRE 3 0112 031805™^