UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AI URBANA-CHAMPAISN Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/costofironpriceoOObake [From the New York “ Iron Age."] f THE COST OF IRON & THE PRICE OF LABOR. THIRD EDITION — Revised and Enlarged. Printed for the Eastern Iron Masters’ Association. We publish below a very interesting letter, and valuable sta- tistics, from Mr. Wm. E. S. Baker, of Philadelphia, Secretary and Treasurer of the Eastern Iron Masters’ Association, and Secretary of the Duncannon Iron Co., upon the present condition of the pig and bar iron production, and the prices of labor, co-operation, &c. Philadelphia, June 19, 1871. Editor ‘ Iron Age New York — Dear Sir: — Covered herein, please find tables of the cost of ore, coal, limestone and labor to the ton of pig iron, together with that of all contingencies, showing the total cost of pig iron at the furnace bank from 1850 to 1871, inclusive, and also the details of the cost of bar iron at the mill for the same period. These figures speak for themselves, and are perfectly reliable. The facilities for compiling them show what advantages are likely to ensue from frequent meetings of our new Iron Masters’ Association, by spreading before its members useful information concerning the iron business. In the accompanying statistics the items of pig iron cost are averaged from a group of furnaces in Central Pennsylvania, close to coal and 2 ore. The merchant bar iron cost is the average of mills in the Schuyl- kill region, not far from pig iron, but more distant from soft coal. The average for both pig and merchant bar iron is below the average cost for the whole State of Pennsylvania , and in neither case is there any charge included for interest on Capital Stock. A ton of raw materials, ore, coal or limestone, will cost in the ground , but a trifle more to-day than it did twenty-five years ago, while the total cost of pig iron has more than doubled in that period, showing that nearly the whole of the in- creased cost is for labor — labor in mining, in transportation, and in working the materials into the saleable product. So that while in Pennsylvania, pig iron is costing about $29.00 a ton, in Great Britain the cost is less than half of that , and even then yields a profit to the manu- facturer. The reason of this is, because of the difference in the cost of labor. And but a small part of this difference can be accounted for by the increased cost of living, arising from taxation or a depreciated cur- rency. Hence a question here arises of vital importance to every manufacturer and workman in the United States, viz.: Is it possible for two countries so intimately related in business as are Great Britain and the United States , to continue for a long period to produce the same article at so great a difference in cost? We think not, and believe that there must and will be an approximation of cost in the two countries, either by a reduction in wages paid American skilled labor, or an ad- vance in foreign labor, unless home labor shall have increased protection from the Government. An advance in labor abroad will be but to lessen the profits of the wealthy iron masters. To reduce labor in this coun- try, where it is conceded that the iron manufacturers are making little or no profit, will be to decrease the comforts and privileges of the workmen. The alternative will be for home capital to abandon the iron manufacture for some more stable and profitable branch of indus- try, to the depreciation, if not ruin of the agricultural and other sur- rounding interests depending upon iron. Twenty-five years ago our cost price was about what the English cost is to-day. But the physi- cal, moral, social and mental condition of the American workman has much improved since then. He is a free citizen of a great Eepublic, with duties and responsibilities unknown abroad. His wants have multiplied, and his increased pay has enabled him hitherto comfortably to meet all demands. Our sympathies are with him, and we desire 3 f r 4 " V) > o y~ £ (jo