Jt ^^r\ I j"^ % ^r^r" ■■■*■■- -i ; .. ^ .':i^ '^■'^^v^ ^^"; ^■v* ^^,- /y*^ 4 THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY vie *®ss?«*aMi«i»»» I i^2'.^ ^^^^^^^'^^^^^ /^t^'/^/^ INQUIRY INTO THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF f^uftlte aajealtl). AND INTO THE MEANS AND CAUSES OF ITS INCREASE. THE EARL OF LAUDERDALE. SECOND EDITION, GREATLY ENLARGED. EDINBURGH: PRINTED FOR ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE & CO. EDINBURGH L0NG3IAN, HURST, RE ES, ORME, AND BROWN, AND HURST, ROBINSON, AND C03IPANY, LONDON. IS if). TO HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE PRINCE OF WALES. SIR, If gratitude for kindness uniform- ly shown me, did not point out your Royal Highness as the Per- son to whom I ouo'ht to inscribe any little effort of my industry; the anxious zeal which constantly animates your Royal Highness's breast, for the welfare of a People amongst whom, fortunately for the British Empire, you hold a station so illustrious and pre-emi- nent, would naturally suggest your Royal Highness, as the Person un- i 35934? C iv ] der whose Protection a Work ought to be placed, the object of which is to elucidate the elementary prin- ciples of a science, on which the Happiness as well as the Wealth of mankind depends. I am, with the highest sense of duty, and most profound feeling of respect, SIR, Your Royal Highness's Much obliged, And most humble servant, LAUDERDALE. January 1804.. CONTENTS. Introduction, - - - Page 1 Chap. I. Of Value and the possibility of an accu- rate Measure of Value, - _ 10 Chap. IL Of Public Wealthy of Individual Riches, and the relation they bear to each other, 37 Chap. III. Of the Sources of Wealth, - - 108 Chap. IV. Of Parsimony, as a Means of increas- ing Wealth, - - - - 198 Chap. V. Of the Means of Augmenting Wealth, and the Causes that regulate its Increase, 269 Appendix, - - _ _ _ 357 ADVERTISEMENT. It is now nearly fourteen years since the publication of the First Edition of this In- quiry ; and, though the author is perfectly aware, that some of his speculatiohs w^ere then unfavourably received, he has, after a careful review of the opinions it con*, tains, seen nothing essential he could wish to alter. In the rectitude of most of his doctrines,^ he is indeed confirmed, — not only by the" approbation with which they hayebeen distinguished in France, in Germany, in Italy, and America, — but, because he peijJ* ceives, that many of the opinions wWch, b Vlll ADVERTISEMENT. in this country, at iirst excited doubt and hesitation, have gradually gained ground to such a degree, that, in most recent publica- tions, they are assumed as indisputed and incontrovertible. Labour is now no longer regarded as a measure of value ; — it is, on the contrary, admitted, that nothing can possess the cha^ racter of forming, at all times, and in all places, an accurate measure of value. The distinction betwixt productive and unproductive labour, — as founded on the produce of labour being immediately con- sumed, or reserved for future use, — is ex- ploded. The origin and nature of the profit of capital is now universally understood : it is, by all, admitted, that capital derives its profits, either from supplanting a portion of labour which would otherwise be per- formed by the hand of man ; — or, from its performing a portion of labour which is be- ADVtRTISEMENT. IX yond the reach of the personal exertion of man to accomplish. Parsimony has ceased to be regarded as the most active means of increasing pubhc wealth ; — and, though the author's opinions on this subject were formerly stated to be the most unmeasured and prejudiced of all his speculations, the greatest advocates for the system of forcing parsimony by legis- lative authority, in the shape of a sinking fund, now agree to the necessity of limit- ing the extent to which it ought to be car- ried. Hitherto, indeed, we have had no experience of the effects of the Sinking Fund, when not counteracted by borrow- ing to a greater extent : — yet there are many who admit the consequences, as stat- ed in the Inquiry, of withdrawing such a portion of revenue from expenditure in consumable commodities, and forcibly con- verting it into capital. The reader will, therefore, find, in this Edition of the Inquiry, no change in the X ADVERTISEMENT. doctrines it contained. The Author cer- tainly has made great alterations ; but these are confined to the objectSAof giving a more distinct view^of the effects of parsimony on public wealth, and of extending the illus- trations of the various opinions he has §i*b- mitted to the public on the Science of Po- litical Economy. July 1818. INTRODUCTION. Though language, from which proceeds the power of both recording and communi- cating our ideas, must be deemed the prin- cipal source of improvement m man ; yet it has been suggested,* that he, " who con- " siders the errors and obscurity, the mis- " takes and confusion, that are spread in " the world by an ill use of words, will find " some reason to doubt whether language, " as it has been employed, has contributed " more to the improvement or hinderance " of knowledge:" and in truth, notwith- standing all the benefits we derive from it, it is certain that the careless and impi'oper use of language often produces much mis- conception, even in the ordinary occur- rences of life. * Locke on the Human Understanding, B. III. Ch. xi sect. 4. 2 mXRODUCTION. In all discussions, therefore, where accu- racy is required, we cannot be too cautious in adopting terms of art, or technical forms of expression, without inquiring into the justness of that node of reasoning from which they have derived their origin. Words have been represented, and indeed are usually considered, as the transcript of those ideas which are in the minds of men. Thus, when we find a phrase in general use, we are apt to regard it as conveying the common testimony of mankind in fa- vour of that species of reasoning which at first sight appears to have suggested it; and adopt, from a suppossed idea of authority, opinions, which a little examination would make us reject. By such carelessness, men often become habituated to the common use of phrases and expressions, without having even called in question their propriety ; and these, forming the basis of further reasoning, gave birth to ideas founded on a series of misconceptions, and consequently to new phrases and turns of expression that tend to perpetuate fallacies. It is by these means INTRODUCTION. that language has, in all sciences, been often found a most powerful supporter of preju- dice, and a most active promoter of error. Speculation in Political Economy una- voidably leads to this train of reflection ; for there is no science so much exposed to this source of error. The subjects of many of the sciences, originating in the concep- tions of the learned, are never treated of but by men of superior education and improv- ed minds, whose language must of course partake of the arm racy of their ideas. But Public Economy, which professes to teach the means of increasing the wealth of a State, and of applying it to the most useful proposes, is of necessity, in all stages of society, a subject of discussion, even amongst the most vulgar and illiterate, whose rude and erroneous conceptions must naturally lead to expressions founded on inaccuracy, and pregnant with error. A strong illustration of the effect which language has upon the tenor of econo- mical reasoning, may be derived from con- sidering the mercantile system of political 4 INTRODUCTION. economy, so long prevalent, which taught us to estimate the progress of our wealth by the Balance of our Trade. If the balance of trade was to have been rested upon as a means of ascertaining the increase of opulence, one would have na- turally thought, that the manner in which the merchant makes up his account of pro- fit and loss, would have suggested itself as the method of estimating the national gain by foreign trade. Thus, as Davenant observes, we would have been led to examine how much the returns imported are worth more than the commodities exported; and attributed to the nation so much gain as the value of the Imports exceeded that of the Exports. But Money being, in its capacity of an instrument of commerce, the immediate means of procuring all the conveniences of life; whilst, as the practical measure of value, we are accustomed to estimate com- modities by the quantity of money they will exchange for; Money and Wealth came to be used, not only in common language, as INTRODUCTION. synonymous; but, in the ideas of men, to get money became expressive of the only means of growing rich. Habituated to this misapplication of lan- guage, and to the ideas they derive from it, the supporters of the mercantile system, making up the accounts of the public in a manner directly the reverse of that they would have followed in making up their own, rejoiced at the excess of the Exports over the Imports; concluding, that the dif- ference must be received in Money, and conceiving that the commodities exported, were merely valuable as instruments to pro- cure Money, which they alone regarded as wealth. Though the prevalence of the mercan- tile system, for above a century, and many consequent errors in the reasonings of our economical writers, as well as in the system of European legislation, all arising out of the habit of conceiving Wealth and Money to be synonymous, form powerful illustra- tions of the effects of language in pro- ducing erroneous ideas in economical rea- O INTRODUCTION. sonings; it is perhaps not the most fatal error introduced into the science of politi- cal economy by the same means. The terms we use, in talking of the wealth of a nation, or of the riches of in- dividuals, are in all languages exactly the same. They denote, that private riches are universally considered in no other light than as a portion of national wealth. The sum total of the riches of those who form the community, is thus regarded as necessarily conveying an accurate statement of the wealth of a nation ; and this idea has be- come so universally prevalent, that, even by philosophers, exchangeable value has been announced as the basis of wealth. * An increase of the fortune of any mem- ber of the society, if not at the expence of any individual belonging to the same community, is uniformly deemed an aug- mentation of national wealth ; and a dimi- nution of any man's property, if not pro- ducing an increase of the riches of some of * See Physiocratie, Philosophic Rurale, and the works of all the Economists. INTRODUCTION. 7 his fellow-subjects, has been considered as of necessity occasioning a concomitant di- minution of national wealth: "For," says an eminent philosopher, " the capital of a so- " ciety, which is the same thing with that " of all the individuals who compose it, " can be increased only in the same man- «' ner."* That public wealth, however, ought not to be considered as merely representing the sum of individual riches, is undoubt- ed ;t and that much of obscurity, and * Smith's Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 410, edit, in 4to.— To the same purpose says Hecato the Rhodian, as represent* ed by Cicero : ". Sapientis esse, nihil contra mores, leges, in- " stituta facientem, hahere rationem rei familiaris ; neque " enim solum nobis divites esse volumus, sed liberis, propin- *' quis, amicis, maximeque reipublicae: singulorum enim fa- " cultates et copiae, divitice sunt civitatis." De OflF. L. iii. C.15. \ The Avords Wealth and Riches are, in common language, used as synonymous. There is no term by which we can de- sign the Wealth of a Community, which is not equally appli- cable to the Riches of Individuals. In treating of private for- tune, however, the word riches will be uniformly used ; and in expressing public opulence, the word wealth. To be more dis- tinct, Private or Individual will be generally prefixed to Riches, and Public to Wealth. 8 INTRODUCTION. even of error, has existed in economical reasoning from confounding them, will be made apparent. As a clear understanding of the rela^ tion which Public Wealth and Individual Riches bear to each other, appears of the highest importance, in securing accuracy in every subject that relates to the science of Political Economy ; the first and se- cond chapters of this Inquiry are there- fore devoted to the consideration of the nature of Value, the possession of which alone qualifies any thing to form a portion of individual riches ; — to an explanation of what Public Wealth is, and of what consti- tutes Individual Riches ; — and to an exa- mination of the relation in which they stand to each other. The meaning annexed in this work to the phrase Public Wealth being thus explained, the third chapter contains an investigation of the Sources of Wealth, in which Land, Labour, and Capital, are separately treated of as the sources of wealth ^ — an opinion which, though it has been announced by INTRODUCTION. 9 some, and hinted at by others, does not seem to have made on any other author so strong an impression as to be uniformly adhered to in the course of his reason- ings. An idea which has generally prevailed, (though it seems in itself a paradox,) that wealth may be increased by means by which it is not produced, in particular by parsimony, or deprivation of expenditure, has made it necessary to investigate this subject in the fourth chapter, as a prelimi- nary to an Inquiry into the Means and Causes of the Increase of Wealth ; which is the object of the fifth chapter. CHAP. 1. OF VALUE, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCU- RATE MEASURE OF VALUE. Before proceeding to consider what con- stitutes public wealth and private riches, or to investigate the circumstances which lead to the increase of either, it is necessary to understand distinctly the nature of Value ; and, by that means, to possess a clear idea of what it is which alone can give to any commodity the character it must acquire, in order to form a part of individual riches. The term Value ^ whatever might have been its original sense, as it is used in com- mon language, does not express a quality OF VALUE. 1 1 inherent in any commodity. There is no- thing which possesses a real, intrinsic, or in- variable value. The possession of no qua- lity, however important to the welfare of man, can confer value ; for water, the most necessary oi all things, seldom pos- sesses it. Experience shews us, that every thing is uniformly considered as valuable, which, to the possession of qualities that make it the object of the desire of man, adds the circumstance of existing in scarcitv. To confer value, therefore, two things appear requisite : 1. That the commodity, as being useful or delightful to man, should be an object of his desire ; 2. That it should ex- ist in a degree of scarcity. With respect to the variations in value, of which every thing valuable is suscep- tible, if we could for a moment suppose that any substance possessed intrinsic and fixed value, so as to render an assumed quantity of it constantly, under all circum- stances, of equal value ; then the degree of value of all things, ascertained by such a 12 OF VALUE. fixed standard, would vary according to the proportion betwixt the quantity of them and the demand for them, and every com- modity would, of course, be subject to a variation in its value from four different circumstances. 1. It would be subject to an increase of its value, from a diminution of its quanti- ty- 2. To a diminution of its value, from an augmentation of its quantity. 3. It might suffer an augmentation in its value, from the circumstance of an in- creased demand. 4. Its value might be diminished, by a failure of demand. As it will, however, clearly appear, that no commodity can possess fixed and intrin- sic value, so as to qualify it for a measure of the value of other commodities, man- kind are reduced to select, as a practical measure of value, that which appears the least liable to any of these four sources of variation, which are the sole causes of alter- ation of value. ©F VALUE. 13 When in common language, therefore, we express the value of any commodity, it may vary at one period from what it is at ano- ther, in consequence of eight different con- tingencies. 1. From the fom* circumstances above stated, in relation to the commodity of which we mean to express the value. And, 2. From the same four circumstances, in relation to the commodity we have adopt- ed as a measure of value. As the value, therefore, of all commodi- ties depends upon the possession of a qua- lity that makes them the object of man's desire, and the circumstance of their exist- ing in a certain degree of scarcity ; it fol- lows that the variation of all value must de- pend upon the alteration of the proportion betwixt the demand for, and the quantity of, the commodity, occasioned by the oc- currence of one of the four circumstances above stated ; and that a variation in the ex- pression of value, may be occasioned by the occurrence of any of the eight circum- stances we have alluded to. The truth of 14 OF VALUE. these propositions may be variously illus- trated. Water, it has been observed, is one of the things most useful to man, yet it sel- dom possesses any value ; and the reason of this is evident : it rarely occurs, that to its quality of utility is added the circumstance of existing in scarcity ; but if, in the course of a siege, or a sea-voyage, it becomes scarce, it instantly acquires value ; and its value is subject to the same rule of varia- tion as that of other commodities. Gold is nowhere to be found in abun- dance ; but scarcity alone cannot give it value, any more than utility alone can con- fer value on water. We are accordingly told, that the poor inhabitants of Cuba and St Domingo, when first discovered by the Spaniards, not knowing the use of gold, considered it as little bits of pebble, just worth the picking up, but not worth the refusing to anybody that asked it ; and that they in reality gave it to their new guests at the first request. * But the know- * Wea'lh of Nations, Vol. I, p. 219, 4to edit. OF VALUE. 15 ledge of its utility by the Spaniards, and its possessing therefore quaUties, that to them made it an object of desire, added to the circumstance of its scarcity, soon gave it value ; and the degree of its value came speedily to be fixed, even in the minds of the natives, on the same principle as that of food, and of all other commodities. Though the scarcity of gold and silver, and the demand for them, have made them what is called most precious, that is, under the general circumstances of mankind, com- modities of the greatest value ; yet parti- cular circumstances may occasion such a scarcity of, and demand for, things of a very ordinary nature, as to make them for a time of a value superior even to those metals. Thus, as Mr Locke well observes, in a man of war, silver may not be of equal value to gunpowder, and a famine may certainly occasion gold's not being worth its weight in bran. The value of every thing is so complete- ly dependent upon the proportion betwixt the demand for it and the quantity of it. 16 OF VALUE. that the possession of no quahty, whatever excellence it might add to a commodity, could produce any material alteration in its value, if it did not affect either the de- mand for it, or the quantity of it. Suppo- sing there could be conferred on Corn, the important attribute, that one grain, when given to an infant on the day of its birth, should secure a century of robust health ; (though it is certain there could not be add- ed to it a qualification more to the general taste of mankind,) yet, as this would pro- duce no alteration in the quantity of grain, and, from the small quantity that would be thus consumed, hardly any perceptible in- crease in the demand for it, we should not be able to discern any variation in its value. So little has the quality of things to do with their value, that it very often hap- pens, when a commodity possesses, in the highest degree of perfection, all the quali- ties which make it desirable, its value is the lowest ; and when, on the contrary, it possesses them in a very inferior degree, its OF VALUE. 17 value is the highest. This is almost con- stantly the case with Grain. In a fine sea- son it is always of a superior, in a bad sea- son of an inferior quality ; yet, as the fine season generally produces an increased, and a bad season a diminished quantity; with a thorough contempt of the quality, the va- lue of the corn is always regulated on the principle here stated ; and the greatness of the quantity, though of a superior quality, reduces its value ; whilst the diminution of its quantity, though of very inferior qua- lity, increases the value in the market. The value of Cattle, though the recom- mendations with regard to breed, fatness, and every other quality that renders them desirable, and even the number of them should remain unaltered, is always found to vary in proportion to the scarcity or abun- dance of the food on which they are nou- rished. The value of certain inferior species ©f grain is also often increased, without any alteration either of the quantity or quality of it, but merely in consequence of an augmentation of demand, arising from a 18 OF VALUE. scarcity of the better sorts of grain, which usually form the bread of the community. We have often occasion to observe that, whilst a web of cloth or a piece of silk have sold at very considerable prices, if there re- mains a small quantity of them, this Rem- nant, as it is called, brings a very inferior price to what was given for the greater part of the same cloth, and of the same piece of silk. On the other hand, a small quantity of stock, in the 3 or 4: per cents,is uniformly sold in the Alley above the market-price of the commodity ; and yet the small pieces of silk and cloth are of the same quality with the whole of the respective webs, and the stock is exactly productive of the same advanta- ges with any other portion of stock ; the va- riations depending, in these cases, totally upon alterations in the degree of demand ; there being few people who wish for so small a piece of cloth, and many who, in consequence of wills and trusts, are obliged to purchase smaller portions of stock for accumulation than are usually exposed in the market. OF VALUE. 19 Thus we may perceive, that the existence of value is perfectly independent of any in- herent characteristic in the commodity it- self; that there is no such thing as intrinsic value ; and that alterations in the degrees of value are not dependent upon any change of quality, but always on some change of proportion betwixt the quantity and the demand for a commodity ; — a sure proof of which is, that we cannot express value, or a variation of value, without a comparison of two commodities; and every variation in the expression of value, must depend upon some alteration in the proportion betwixt the quantity of and demand for, one or other of the commodities compared. For example, if the price of grain is to be expressed in silver, it might vary, in con- sequence of the circumstance of the altera- tion of the proportion betwixt the quantity of the grain and the demand for it ; it might also alter, in consequence of the variation betwixt the proportion of silver and the de- mand for it. It may happen, too, that al- terations might take place in both those 20 OF VALUE. proportions ; which must likewise generally produce a variation in the expression of va- lue. For though it is possible that there should exist alterations in both, and that the relative proportion betwixt the quanti- ty and demand for each should still be preserved, yet it is highly improbable, that, uhder such circumstances, this equilibrium should be maintained. The opinions, that are here stated, con- cerning the nature and the causes of the variation of value, are nowise new. They have been hinted at by many; and by some they have been long ago explained with tolerable accuracy.* Ihey do not, how- ♦ The following extract, from Mr Law's Treatise on Money, published in Scotland in 1705, seems to convey an accurate idea of the nature of value. " Mr Locke says, '* the " value of goods is according to their quantity, in proportion ** to their vent. The vent of goods cannot be greater than the ** quantity, but the demand may be greater. If the quantity " of wine brought from France be 100 ton, and the demand " be for 500 ton, the demand is greater than the vent, and the <* 100 ton will sell at a higher price than if the demand were *' only equal to the vent; so the prices of goods are not ac- " cording to the quantity in proportion to the vent, but in pro. " portion to the demaad." OF VALUE. 21 ever, appear to have been so clearly under- stood as to destroy the idea of any thing possessing a real and fixed value, so as to qualify it to form a measure of value. Af- ter this philosopher's stone many have been in search ; and not a few, distinguish- ed for their knowledge and their talents, have imagined that in Labour they had discovered what constituted a real measure of value. Of this fancy Sir William Petty's mind seems to have been fully possessed, when he composed the follow- ing passage :* *' Suppose a man could, " with his own hands, plant a certain scope " of land with corn ; that is, could dig or " plough, harrow, reap, carry home, thresh, " and winnow, so much as the husbandry " of this land requires, and liad withal seed " wherewith to sow the same. I say, that " when this man hath subducted his seed " out of the proceed of his harvest, and " also what himself hath both eaten and * Treatise of Taxes and Constitutions, p. 23, I'to edit, 1667. 22 OF VALUE. " given to others in exchange for clothes, " and other natural necessaries, that the " remainder of corn is the natural and true *^ rent of the land for that year; and the *' medium of seven years, or rather of so " many years as make up the cycle, with- ^« in which dearths and plenties make their " revolution, doth give the ordinary rent ^« of the land in corn. " But a further, though collateral que- *« stion may be. How much English money " this corn or rent is worth ? I answer, so « much as the money which another single <' man can save within the same time, over " and above his expence, if he employed " himself wholly to produce and make it ; " viz. Let another man go travel into a " country where is silver, there dig it, re- " fine it, bring it to the same place where <* the other man planted his corn, coin it, " &c. ; the same person, all the while of " his working for silver, gathering also food " for his necessary livelihood, and procur- " ing himself covering, &c. I say the sil- OF VALUE. ^23 " ver of the one must be esteemed of equal " value with the corn of the other." The same idea is stated by Mr Harris, in his ingenious Essay on Money and Coins : " The values of land and labour do, as it " were of themselves, mutually settle or * adjust one another; and as all things or ** commodities are the products of those " two, so their several values are naturally " adjusted by them. But, as in most pro- " ductions, labour hath the greatest share, " the value of labour is to be reckoned the ** chief standard that regulates the value of " all commodities; and more especially, as " the value of land is, as it were, already *^ allowed for in the value of labour itself" The Author of the Inquiry into the Wealth of Nations, is, however, the person who has struggled most to establish the opinion, that labour may be considered as an accurate measure of value ; and Baron Hertzberg, who, in his Discourse on the Wealth of Nations, has declared that it is admirably proved in the profound and classical work of Dr Smith, that labour is 24 OF VALUE. the true, universal and exact measure of the value of all goods and merchandise, is not the only distinguished disciple who has maintained this doctrine. That this opinion is unfounded, is never- theless apparent from the circumstance, that value cannot be expressed but by a compari- son of two commodities : whereas it is evi- dent, if there existed any thing qualified to form a measure of value, that degrees of value could be denoted by different por- tions of such a commodity, without the necessity of any comparison. Indeed, it is the effect, that the belief in the existence of an accurate measure of value must have in destroying all just idea of the nature of value, and the authority of those who have held this doctrine, ra- ther than the ingenuity or even plausibility of the manner in which it is supported, that makes it worthy of consideration. To those who understand any thing of the nature of value, or on what its varia- tions depend, the existence of a perfect measure of value must at once appear im- OF VALUE, Its possible : for as nothing can be a real mea- sure of magnitude and quantity, which is subject to variations in its own dimensions, so nothing can be a real measure of the value of other commodities, which is con-^ stantly varying in its own value. But as there is nothing which is not subject to variations, both in its quantity and in the demand for it, there can be nothing which is not subject to alteration in value. In the learned work, however, alluded to, the author, without descending to any reasoning, qualifies labour for sustaining the character of a measure of value, by de* daring, that " labour alone never varies in " its own value."* And this appears more extraordinary, because labour is the thing most subject to variation in its value, and is of course, of all others that could have been selected, the worst calculated to per- form that duty. As, however, nothing else has ever been held out as constituting an accurate mea- sure of value ; and as the opinion still has * Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 38. 4to edit. ^6 OF VALUE. its advocates, that labour is such, though completely destructive of every correct view of the nature of value, it is perhaps worth while, in order to extinguish the idea of the possibility of its forming an ac- curate measure of value, shortly to prove that, of all things, it is the least qualified for this task, by references to what seems the least suspicious authority, — opinions delivered in that very work, which de- clares labour to possess fixed and invari- able value ; and which has been affirmed to contain substantial proof that labour is a real measure of value. Things may alter in their value : 1. At periods not remote ; as for exam- ple, of the same year. 2. At remote periods of time, 3. In different countries. 4. In different parts of the same coun- try. These may be generally considered as the four cases which give rise to alterations in the value of all commodities ; for, gene- rally speaking, there is nothing subject to Ot VALUE. 27 variation of value at the same time, and in the same place. Labour, however, it will appear, in the opinion of the learned au- thor, who styles it the sole thing invariable in its value, is subject not only to all the usual sources of variation, but possesses ex- clusively the characteristic of varying at the same time and place. 1. That labour varies in its value at dif- ferent periods of the same year, every per- son must know, who has observed, that " the demand for country labour is greater " at hay-time and harvest, than during the " greater part of the year : and wages rise " with the demand. In time of war, when " forty or fifty thousand sailors are forced " from the merchant service into that of " the King, the demand for sailors to mer- " chant ships necessarily rises with their ** scarcity, and their wages, upon such oc- " casions, commonly rise from a guinea " and seven and twenty shillings, to forty " shillings and three pounds a month *.'* ♦ Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 140, 4to edit. 28 OF VALUE. 2. That labour varies in its value at dis- tant and remote periods of time, seems established by the following facts : " The " real recompence of labour, the real quan- " tity of the necessaries and conveniences " of life which it can procure to the la- " bourer, has, during the course of the " present century, increased perhaps in a *^ still greater proportion than its money- " price '^ * And, again, " The money-price of labour " in Great Britain has indeed risen during " the course of the present century. This ^^ however, seems to be the effect, not so " much of any diminution in the value of *' silver in the European market, as of an " increase of the demand for labour in Great *' Britain, arising from the great, and al- " most universal, prosperity of the coun- " try." t 3. The comparison made betwixt Eng- land and America, shows clearly the dif- ference that takes place in the value of * Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 0^, 4to edit. f Ibid, Vol. I. p. 251, 4toedit. OF VALUE. 29 labour in distant and remote countries: *' England is certainly, in the present times, " a much richer country than any part of " North America. The wages of labour, " however, are much higher in North ** America than in any part of England. " In the province of New York, common " labourers earn three shilhngs and six- " pence currency, equal to two shilhngs " Sterling a day ; ship-carpenters ten shil- *' lings and sixpence currency, with a pint " of rum, worth sixpence Sterling, equal in " all to six shillings and sixpence Sterling ; " house-carpenters and brick-layers eight " shillings currency, equal to four shillings " and sixpence Sterling j journeymen tailors " five shillings currency, equal to about two " shillings and tenpence Sterling. These " prices are all above the London price ; '* and wages are said to be as high in the ** other colonies as in New York. The " price of provisions is every where, in " North America, much lower than in " England. A dearth has never been ** known there. In the worst seasons, 80 OP VALUE. <* they have always had a sufficiency for " themselves, though less for exportation. " If the money-price of labour, therefore, ** be higher than it is any where in the " mother country, its real price, the real " command of the necessaries and con- " veniencies of life which it conveys to " the labourer, must be higher in a still ** greater proportion." * Further, " Labour " in America is so well rewarded, that a " numerous family of children, instead " of being a burden, is a source of opu- " lence and prosperity to the parents. " The labour of each child, before it can " leave their house, is computed to be " worth L. 100 clear gain to them. A " young widow, with four or fi\e young " children, who among the middUng or ** inferior ranks of people jn Europe, " would have so little chance for a second ** husband, is there frequently courted as ^* a sort of fortune." f • Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 85. 4to edit. f Ibid. Vol. I. p. 65. 4to edit. OF VALUE. 31 4. The following facts not only shew the extraordinary variations in the value of la- bour, that take place in different parts of the same country; but the ingenious rea- soning, which accompanies it, points out why these variations on the value of labour must be more permanent than in any other commodity. " Eighteen pence a day may " be reckoned the common price of labour " in London and its neighbourhood. At a " few miles distance it falls to fourteen and " fifteen pence. Ten pence may be rec- •* koned its price in Edinburgh and its " neighbourhood. At a few miles distance " it falls to eight pence, the usual price of ** common labour through the greater part *« of the low country of Scotland, where it " varies a good deal less than in England. " Such a difference of prices, which it " seems is not always sufficient to trans- " port a man from one parish to another, " would necessarily occasion so great a " transportation of the most bulky commo- *' dities, not only from one parish to ano- ** ther, but from one end of the kingdom. S2 OF VALUE. ^' almost from one end of the world, to the " other, as would soon reduce them . more " nearly to a level. After all that has been " said of the levity and inconstancy of hu- " man nature, it appears evidently from " experience that a man is of all sorts of <« luggage the most difficult to be transport- « ed."* Thus labour seems to partake of those four sources of variation, which are the general reasons of alteration in the value of all commodities. But this is not all : for this pretended accurate measure of value is not capable even, like other com- modities, of forming a true measure of value at the same time and place ; which is evident, when we recollect, that, '* at " the same time and place, the real and the " nominal price of all commodities are ex- " actly in proportion to one another. The " more or less money you get for any com- " modity, in the London market, for ex- " ample, the more ot less labour it will at * Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 91. 4to edit. OF VALUE. S3 " that time or place enable you to purchase " or command. At the same time and place, " therefore, money is the exact measure of " the real exchangeable value of all com- " modities." * Whereas, on the other hand, it must be observed, that the value of labour " cannot be ascertained very ac- " curately any where, different prices be- " ing often paid at the same place, and for " the same sort of labour, not only accord- " ing to the different abilities of the work- " men, but according to the easiness or " hardness of the masters, f Now, the variation here pointed out must be in the real value of labour, and not in that of the money by which we express its value ; because money, at tlie same time and place, forming an exact measure of the ex- changeable value of all commodities, can- not, under such circumstances, vary in its own valu' . It is, indeed, most extraordinary, that * Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 44. 4to edit, t Ibid. Vol. I. p. 94. C OP VALUE. the author of the Wealth of Nations should ever have considered labour as an accu- rate measure of value ; for in Book II. Chap. iii. of his work, he treats of pro- ductive and unproductive labour, and there- in announces an opinion, which forms one of the most striking features of his theory, that a great portion or description of la- bour is totally unproductive : yet it is evi- dent, that a proposition, holding forth a mathematical point as a measure of dimen- sion, would not be more absurd than pro- posing any thing unproductive as a mea- sure of value. To avoid this apparent contradiction, it has been supposed, that the characteristic of beino: a measure of value was meant to be confined to that species of labour which the author, throughout his work, has cal- led productive labour : but in stating even productive labour to be a measure of value, he must for the moment have forgot the subject of his first book, which treats of the improvement of the productive powers of labour as the effect of the division of labour. OF VALUE. 35 For if, according to the theory there de- tailed, the productive powers, that is, the value of labour, is continually improving, and exists in different states of improve- ment, in proportion as it is subdivided, with what consistency can it be said, that labour, supposing it to be limited to pro- ductive labour, " never varies in its own " value, and forms the ultimate and real " standard by which the value of all com- *' modities can, at all times and places, be " estimated and compared ?" Great, therefore, as the authorities are who have regarded labour as a measure of value, and who by so doing have contradict- ed that view of the nature of value which has been here given, it does not appear that labour forms any exception to the ge- neral rule, that nothing possesses real, fixed or intrinsic value; or that there is any sohd reason for doubting the two general prin- ciples we have endeavoured to establish : — 1. That things are alone valuable in con- sequence of their uniting qualities, which make them the objects of man's desire, witli 36 OF VALUE. the circumstance of existing in a certain degree of scarcity. 2. That the degree of value which every commodity possesses, depends upon the proportion betwixt the quantity of it and the demand for it. CHAP. II. OF PUBLIC WEALTH, OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES, AND OF THE RELATION THEY BEAR TO EACH OTHER. Though the advantages which all reason- ings on Pohtical Economy must have de- rived from a clear explanation of what constitutes national or public wealth ar^ apparent; and though a precise understand- ing of what wealth is, seems a necessary preliminary to the discussing, with any de- gree of accuracy, the means of increasing it ; we must regret, that a definition of Public Wealth is no where to be found. This deficiency, however, does not appear to have proceeded so much from any sense of difficulty in defining national wealth, or in describing wherein it is conceived to con- sist, as from a general feeling of its being 88 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND needless to express that about which all men are agreed. For the theories and opinions of all speculative writers sufficiently shew, that they have entertained, on this subject, the same ideas with those who, in the exer- cise of the practice of taxation, have been obliged to express their opinions more dis- tinctly. » The capital of a society has been re- garded, in every respect, as the same with that of all the individuals who compose it ; * and the sum-total of the fortunes of individuals, has been conceived to con- vey an accurate description of the mass of national wealth. Parsimony, which expe- rience teaches us is the most usual means of increasing private fortune, is universally represented as the parent of public wealth. Frugality is said to increase, prodigality to diminish, the public capital, f Every pro- digal is represented as a public enemy, and every frugal man as a public benefactor. :|: * Wealth of Nations, Vol. 1. p. 409, 4to edit, f Wealth of Nations, A'ol. I. p. 421, 4to edit. X Ibid, Vol. I. p. 414. OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 39 So much, indeed, is public wealth univer- sally deemed the same thing with the mass of private riches, that there appears no means of increasing the fortune of an indi- vidual, when it is not done directly at the expence of another, that is not regarded as productive of national opulence. On this principle have proceeded the va- rious statenlents of national wealth, which have at different times been submitted to the public. Thus, by Sir William Petty's computation, in the year 1664, the total wealth of the nation, consisting of lands, houses, shipping, gold and silver coin, wares, merchandise, plate, furniture, &c. amount- ed to two hundred and fifty millions. In the beginning of the eighteenth century, Gregory King computed the landed and personal property at six hundred and fif- teen millions. - Mr Hooke computed the whole value of real and personal property, about fifty years ago, at two thousand one hundred millions sterling. Sir William Pul- teney, about thirty years after, valued the landed and personal property at two thou- 40 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND sand millions. The total amount of the wealth of Great Britain, consisting of the value of articles above enumerated, has also been computed by Dr Beeke, to be nearly two thousand five hundred millions sterling, exclusive of one hundred millions sterling, the value of foreign possessions be- longing to the subjects of Great Britain. * * The principles on which these calculations of naLional wealth proceed, are fully explained in the 90th paragraph of Turgot's work, entitled, Reflexions sur la formation et la dis- tribution des Ruhesses. — " § 90. La Richesse totale d'une na- " tion eat compusee, 1° du revenu net de torn les bkns fonds " multiplie par le taux du prix des terres ; 2" de la somme de *' toutes les richesses mobilieres existantes dans la nation. " Les bjens-fond equivalent a u^'. capital egal a leur reveiiu " annuel, multiplie par le denier courant, auquel les terres sc *' vendent, Ainsi si Ton additionnoit le revenu de toutes les *• terres, c'est-a-dire, le revenu not qu'elles rcndcnt aux pro- " prietaires et a tous ceux qui en partagent la propriety, com- " me le seigneur qui per^oii une rente, le cure, qui pergoit la " dixnu , le souverain,qui pergoit I'impot: si, dis-je, additionnoit " toutes ces soaimes ct qu'on les multipliat par le taux au- ** quel se vendent les terres, on auroit la somme des richesses " d'une nation en biens-fonds. Pour avoir la totalile des ri- '' chesses d'une nation, il faut y joindre les richesses inobili- ** frfs, qui consistent dans la somme des capitaux employes *' dans toutes les enterprises de culture, d'industrie, et de com- «* merce, et qui n'cn sortent jamais, toutes lesavances en toute " i>xun- d'enlf rprise devant sans cesse rentrer aux entiepre- '' neur><, pour etre sans cesse reveisees dans I'enterprise, qui *' sans ccla ne pourroit etre continuec." OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 4l It is, however, impossible to subscribe to the idea, that the sum-total of individual riches forms an accurate statement of pub- lic wealth. Though the opinion has been universally prevalent, it must be deemed false and unfounded by every man who considers the subject, after having formed, and familiarized himself to, an accurate and distinct opinion of the nature of value. It must, then, appear, that a commo- dity being useful or delightful to man, can- not alone give it value ; that to obtain value, or to be (qualified to constitute a portion of private riches, it must combine with that quality, the circumstance of existing in a certain degree of scarcity. Yet the com- mon sense of mankind would revolt at a proposal for augmenting wealth by creatino- a scarcity of any commodity generally use- ful and necessary to man. For example, let us suppose a country possessing abun- dance of the necessaries and conveniences of life, and universally accommodated with the purest streams of water: — what opi- nion would be entertained of the under- 42 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND standing of a man, who, as the means of increasing the wealth of such a country, should propose to create a scarcity of water, the abundance of which was deserv- edly considered as one of the greatest blessings incident to the community ? It is certain, however, that such a projector would, by this means, succeed in increasing the mass of individual riches ; for to the water, which would still retain the quality of being useful and desirable, he would add the circumstance of existing in scarcity, which of course must confer upon it value ; and, when it once obtained value, the same circumstances that fix the value of its produce for a certain number of years, as the price of the possession of land which produces food, would equally fix the value of the produce of springs for a certain num- ber of years, as the price of the possession of that which produced drink; and thus the individual riches of the country would be increased, in a sum equal to the value of the fee-simple of all the wells. But further to illustrate this proposition, of INDIVIDUAL RiCHfiS. 48 that public wealth, and the mass of in- dividual riches, cannot be regarded as in every respect the same, let us for a mo- ment suppose it possible to create as great an abundance of any species of food as there exists of water : what would be thought of the advice of a man, who should cautiously recommend, even at the moment of the pressure of scarcity, to beware of creating this boasted abundance ? for, how- ever flattering it might appear as a reme- dy for the immediate evil, it would inevita- bly diminish the wealth of the society. Yet ridiculous as this opinion might ap- pear, as every thing, which partakes of the abundance of water or air, must at once cease to possess value ; it follows that, by occasioning such an abundance, the sum- total of individual riches would most cer- tainly be diminished, to an extent equal to the total value of that species of food, whose value would by this means be destroyed. When we reflect on the situation of this country, it appears, indeed, almost self-evi- dent, that the sum-total of individual riches 4i OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND cannot be considered as affording an accu- rate statement of public wealth. At present the capital of the national debt amounts nearly to five hundred mil- lions. We have seen, and know, that war, even in the course of the first year, may sink the value of this capital twenty per cent, ; that is, that it may diminish the mass of in^ dividual fortunes one hundred millions; and thus impose upon any man, who made up the account of public wealth, on the prin- ciple that an accurate statement of it was to be derived from adding together the fortunes of individuals, the necessity of saying, that one hundred millions of our wealth had vanished. But this is not all. The value of many things sinks at the same time. In the value of land, in particular, we have seen a considerable diminution, which would create the necessity of a further re- duction in this statement of public wealth. Yet the surface of the national territory remains unaltered; the landlord receives the same rent ; the stockholder is paid OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES* 45 the same interest ; and there is no one thing, on which a man can lay his hand as an article of national wealth, which does not appear to retain the same quali- ties that rendered it either useful or de- sirable, and to be in every respect un- altered. It seems, therefore, apparent, that an increase in the mass of individual riches does not necessarily increase the wealth of the community ; that it is possible to imagine a very important increase of public wealth, which must diminish the mass of individual riches ; and that the practice of considering the sum-total of individual riches, as calculated to convey an accurate idea of the wealth of a society, must be regarded as erroneous.* > Indeed, a little further consideration * The following passage from the Abbe Morellet's Prospec- tus de nouveau Dictionnaire du Commerce, page 204, shews that he must have felt the distinction, though he had not, at that time, formed a distinct idea of the data on which the wealth of a community ought to be calculated. " Puisque les richesses sont I'objet du commerce, et en ge- *• n6ral de leconomie politique, on voit que le tableau du cora- ** merce de chaque etat devoit presenter I'enumeration de ses 46 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND makes it evident, that, if we could suppose Nature to bestow on any community, or Art to procure for them, such an abun- dance, that every individual should find himself in possession of whatever his ap- petites could want, or his imagination wish or desire, they would possess the greatest possible degree of wealth ; though, under such circumstances, it is impossible that any commodity could obtain the attribute of value : for, like water and air, all com- modities, that partake of their abundance, must at once be divested of value, or of the possibility of constituting any part of indivi- dual riches. The inhabitants of a country thus abounding in all that man can desire, " richesses. Mais cette enumeration paroit avoir de grandes ** difficultes. On ne connoit pas bien les elemens de cette ** espece de calcul, etl'on ignore peutetre encore I'art d'em- " ployer ceux qu'on a." The principles on which the calculation of the wealth of a community ought to proceed, are as evident as it is clear, that the sum-total of individual riches must give a fallacious repre- sentation of public wealth. The sum-total of individual rich- es, can convey only the value of all things belonging to the community, that have value in exchange. The wealth of a country, on the contrary, consists in the abundance of what is useful or delightful to man. OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 47 would, without the possibility of possessing riches, enjoy all the wealth and comforts which the largest fortunes can secure. Di- minish this supposed abundance, it is ob- vious you will impoverish the community ; but you will, by such diminution, infallibly confer value on the commodities used or desired by man, and, of course, create indi- vidual riches. Subsequent, however, to this diminution, which occasions the exist- ence of riches, those who remain possessed even of the largest fortunes, cannot enjoy a greater quantity of the objects of their desire, than the community at large possess- ed, in that supposed state of society where abundance precluded the existence of va- lue, and, of course, the possibihty of indi- vidual riches. * Important as this distinction, which we have endeavoured to establish, between the * Though the opinions entertained by the economists lead them uniformly to confound Wealth and Riches, it bein^ their l)v'\ncip\e,fjuelavaleurvenole est ta base de to-ufe ric/iesse,(juc son ac- croissement ett accroisement de ric/i£Sses,[Vhi\osoyhieRurdlt,r).60. " That value in exchange is the basis of wealth, and that the '* increase of price is an increase of wealth ;" yet there are pas- sages in their writings, which evidently shew, that the dis- tinction betwixt wealth and riches had occXirred to them ; for 48 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND wealth of a nation, and the sum-total of the riches of individuals, will afterwards appear to be, in regulating our opinions on every example : " It is necessary to distinguish wealth from riches. " The former possesses value in use, but no value in exchange. " The latter possesses a value both in use and exchange. It is *' not sufficient for a nation to possess wealth ; it is necessary *' it should endeavour to procure great riches, in order to ad- " minister, by means of commerce, to the desires of all the " members of which it is composed." Physiocratie, p. cxviii. (For the original see Appendix, No. I.) The same distinction is alluded to in Child's Discourse oh Trade, as well as in other works on that subject. " I shall conclude with two or three requests to the reader. " 3. That in all his meditations upon these principles, he " would warily distinguish between the profit of the merchant, " and the gain of the kingdom, which are so far from being al- " ways parallels, that frequently they run counter one to the '* other, although most men, by their education and business, " having fixed their eye and aim wholly upon the former, do *' usually confound these two in their thoughts and discourses " of trade, or else mistake the former for the latter." Preface to Child's Discourse on Trade, 4th edition, p. 40. " The state on some occasions may gain most, when private *' men by their resources get least." England's Treasure by Foreign Trade, p. 1 1. Glasgow edition, printed 1755. " For all men do consent, that plenty of money in a kingdom " doth make the native commodity dearer, which, as it is to the " profit of some private men in their revenues, so is it directly «' against the benefit of the public." lb. p. 25- " The merchants knew perfectly well in what manner to " enrich themselves^ It was their business to know it. But " to know in what manner it enriched the country, was no " part of their business." Wealth of Nations, Vol. II. p. S^ 4to edit. OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 49 question relating to the science of Political Economy; it is perhaps still more important to observe, that, in proportion as the riches of individuals are increased by an augmen- tation of the value of any commodity, the wealth of the society is generally diminish- ed ; and in proportion as the mass of indi- vidual riches is diminished, by the diminut tion of the value of any commodity, its opu- lence is generally increased. No man can doubt that an abundance of grain is a most important article of wealth. As little can it be doubted, that a scarcity of grain is a most serious symptom of po- verty ; yet we are told, by great authority, ^ that a defect in .the harvest will raise the price of corn in the following proportions : Defect. - 1. Tenth, 2. Tenths, 3. Tenths, 4. Tenths, 5. Tenths, o a f >^< CD Above the common rate. 3.Tenths. 8. Tenths. 1.6 Tenths. 2.8 Tenths. 4.5 Tenthsr * Grei;ury Kmi^'b Calculation, [jublishcl by Davcnant, Vol. J I. p. 224. D 50 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND According to this opinion, therefore, a deficiency of three-tenths of the common produce of the country in grain, would in- crease the value of the grain that remained 1 60 per cent. ; that is, suppose the usual produce of any country to be 300 quarters of grain, and the total value of that grain to be L. 300 ; if the grain was reduced three- tenths in quantity, viz. to 210 quarters, then the value of these 210 quarters would be L. 546. Thus the wealth of the com- munity being diminished by the loss of three-tenths of the whole of its produce of grain, the value of its grain would thereby be increased from L. 300 to L. 546 ; and there would, by that means, be added to the mass of individual riches, a sum nearly equal to the value which the whole grain of the country bore when no such scarcity existed. On the other hand, it is conjectured by authority equally respectable, * that the production of one-tenth part more grain * See Spectator, No. 200. OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 51 than is usually consumed, would diminish the value of the grain one-half; that is, that if the produce of a country was 300 quarters, and its general value L. 300, if the wealth of the society should be increas- ed by the production of 30 more quarters of grain, then the mass of individual riches would be diminished L. 135, as the value of the 330 quarters, at 10s. a quarter, would only amount to L. 165 ; whereas the value of the 300 quarters, before the produce was increased, at 20s. a quarter, amounted to L. 300. * * That the diminution of the quantity has the effect of raising the value for which the total of any commodity sells at the market; and the increase, the effect of diminishing it; is an observation made by many writers, though they disagree about the ratio in which it is increased and diminished. Thus^ " Merchants observe, that if the commodity in market is di- " minished one-third beneath its mean quantity, it will be *' nearly dt)ubk'd in value; and that if it is augmented one- " third above its mean quantity, it will sink near one-half in " its value ; and that, by further diminishing or augmenting *' the quantity these disproportions between the quantity and " prices vastly increase." Considerations on the Policy of Entails, by Sir John Dalrymple, p. 14. " People who understand Trade, will readily agree with me, " that the tenth part of a commodity in a market, more thait " there is a brisk demand for, is apt to lower the market, per- 52 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND So truly is this principle understood by those whose interest leads them io take ad- vantage of it, that nothing but the impos- sibility of general combination protects the public wealth against the rapacity of pri- vate avarice ; for, wherever combination has been possible, mankind have found, in the diminution of their wealth, the fatal eifects of this disposition. It is on this principle, that the Dutch were said to burn a considerable quantity of spiceries, when- ever mankind was favoured with a fertile season ; and that they gave to the natives of the several islands premiums for collect- ing the young blossoms and green leaves " haps 20 or 30 per coif., and that a deficiency of a tenth part '' will cause us exorbitant an advance." Speech without Doors, addressed to the National Creditors, 1737, p- 13. " Another circumstance appears to have escaped the notice '* of the memorialists, namely, that, in proportion as the quan- " tity of goods increases, the price or value will diminish.'' " The week following the arrival of the Ganges, the com- '' pany's raw silk was sold, but for L. 20,000 less than what ** the silk would have sold for, if the ship had not arrived, " and it has frequently happened, that the company have sus- " tained immense losses, in consequence of ofl'ering to sale a " very small quantity of goods, more than what the demand " required." Memorial for the East India Company to the Trcasurv. OP INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 5S of the nutmeg trees, by which means they destroyed them. It was a similar motive that, in the year 1731, induced the pro- prietors of the old vineyards in France, to solicit an order in Council, which they ob- tained, prohibiting both the planting of new vineyards, and the renewal of those old ones, of which the cultivation had been interrupted for two years, without a parti- cular permission from the King, to be granted only in consequence of information from the Intendant of the province, certi- fying that he had examined the land, and that it was incapable of any other culture. The same idea Jed the tobacco-planters in Virginia to pass an act of Assembly, by which they restrained the cidtivation of tobacco to 6000 plants for every negro kept ; and afterwards induced them to agree, in plentiful years, to burn a certain proportion of tobacco for every negro. Further to illustrate this doctrine, let us suppose a country whose annual produc- tions, that is, whose revenue, amounted in value to fifty thousand pounds, in which, when all the various articles produced 54' OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND bore their usual proportions to one another, the grain was in quantity twenty thousand quarters, and in value twenty thousand pounds, and, of course, the value of the other commodities thirty thousand. Let us also suppose, that the mar- ket price of all things producing reve- nue should, on an average, be twenty-five years' purchase of the value of the reve- nue produced ; of course, the total wealth of such a country, estimated in the method Mr King and others have pursued, would amount to twelve hundred and fifty thou- sand pounds. If, in such a country, thei'e was a sudden diminution of production, to the extent of one half of the usual quantity of grain, it would, according to Davenant, add five- tenths to the value of the grain in the mar- ket, * there would therefore exist ten thou- sand quarters of grain, the value of which would be fifty-five thousand pounds. That, under these circumstances, the grain could not be acquired by giving other * Davenanl's Wcrk , Vol. II. p. 224. 7 OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 55 articles of production in exchange for it. is manifest, because the hypothesis as- sumes, that all the other commodities pro- duced were onlj worth thirty thousand pounds, and many parts of tiiem must, of course, be exchanged by the consumers ior one another. Such an unfortunate situation must therefore involve the necessity of part of the produce in grain being paid for by the consumers, giving in exchange for things produced a proportion of what may be called capital, in the general sense of the word, as opposed to revenue. It is needless to enter into any minute calculation, of wdiat would be the probable amount in value of the capital that would, under such circumstances, be transferred to the growers of grain, in payment of their commodity, over and above their usual share of the other annual produc- tions. Let us suppose that it might be equal in value to thirty thousand pounds ; though most probably it would be more, from the circumstance that an augmenta- 56 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND tion in the value of grain must occasion such a diminution in demand for all other articles, as would infinitely lower their value. On this supposition, the value of the whole production would amount to eighty thousand pounds ; composed of filty thou- sand, being the augmented value of grain, and twenty-five, the reduced value of all other commodities. But if the withdrawing ten thousand quarters of grain from the annual produc- tion, might add thirty thousand pounds to the value of these productions, this in- creased revenue, estimated as formerly at twenty-five years' purchase, would make the sum of national wealth amount to two millions : an apparent augmentation of seven hundred and fifty thousand, pro- duced by a diminution of the quantity of grain, and, of course, of the aggregate of commodities, in which public wealth un- doubtedly consists. From these considerations, it seems evi- dent, not only that the sum-total of indivi- OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 57 dual riches cannot be considered as an ac- curate description or definition of the wealth of any community ; but that, on the contrary, it may b& generally affirmed, that an increase of riches, wlien arising from alterations in the quantity of commo- dities, is always a proof of an immediate diminution of wealth ; and a diminution of riches,^ is evidence of an immediate in- crease of wealth : and this proposition will be found invariably true, with the excep- tion of a single case, which will be after- wards explained. Thus, it becomes ne- cessary to adopt a definition of Public Wealth, which conveys a different idea of it from that which has been generally re- ceived ; and it is therefore submitted, that Wealth may be accurately defined, — to consist of all that man desires^ as useful or delightful to him, * * III the Projet d'une dixme Royale, published in the name of the Marechal De Vauban, and generally conceived to be his work, (thoui^h Voltaire, in his Doutes sur le testament: du Cardinal de Richelieu, says it was written by M. de Bois Guilbeit,) Wealth is nearly accurately defined in the fol- lowing terms : ♦' La vrai richesse d'un Royaume consist^ dans 58 1)F PUBLIC WEALTH, AND But if Public Wealth is truly and rightly defined, to consist of all that man desires as useful and delightful to him ; as (from the explanation that has been already given of the nature of value, or of the circum- stances that entitle any thing to the cha- racter which qualifies it for forming a por- tion of individual riches) we know, that, by adding the circumstance of scarcity to the qualities which make any commodity a component part of public wealth, we should give it value, and thus qualify it to form a portion of individual riches, it fol- lows, that individual riches may be defined, -^/o consist of all that man desires as useful or delightful to him ; which exists in a degree of scarcity. With regard to the degree in which any commodity is to be classed as forming a portion of individual riches, it has already been explained and made evident, that the value of every thing depends upon the pro- portion betwixt the demand for it, and the " I'abondance dcs denrees.'^ " The true wealth of a nation " consists in the abundance of its commodities." OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 59 quantity of it. But distinctly to understand the nature of individual riches, and the changes and variations of which they are susceptible, it will be necessary to examine into the alterations of value which the va- riation of that proportion, in any one com- modity, may create in the general mass of individual riches. The value of every commodity, it has been observed, may be altered : 1. By a diminution in its quantity; 2. By an increase in its quantity ; 3. By an increase of demand ; 4. By a diminution of demand. And, to explain this subject thoroughly, each of these cases must be considered in its order, as well as the effects which they are likely to produce, not only on the com- modity itself in relation to which they oc- cur, but subsequently with a view to the effects which they indirectly produce upon the value of all other commodities, which form portions of individual riches. 60 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND 1. Of the Effects of the Diminution of the Quantity of any Co?mnodify on the Value of that Commodity. On first consideration, it naturally oc- curs, that if the members of a society had devoted a portion of then' respective riches for the acquisition of any given commodi- ty, and a sudden scarcity had occasioned the existence of only half of the usual quantity of that commodity, the same por- tion of other goods, remaining applicable to the acquisition of the half which had antecedently been employed in acquiring the whole, the value of any quantity of it would be doubled. For example : if one thousand pound w^eioht formed the ordinary consumption of su, OP PUBLIC WEALTH, AND tne supply continuing at one thousand pounds weight, there should suddenly arise a demand for two thousand pounds weight, it is equally obvious, that, in this case, the demand would be double the quantity for which there existed a supply. The new proportion, therefore, established betwixt the demand and the quantity, would, in either case, be exactly the same ; and, of course, the value of any given quantity of sugar must, in either case, undergo exactly the same alteration. If, therefore, we could suppose that there was any accuracy in conjecturing, that the diminution of the supply of sugar from one thousand to five hundred pound weight, would raise the value of sugar from one shilling to eight shillings a pound, it fol- lows, that sugar, if the demand was by any means doubled, would also rise to eight shillings a polmd ; the wliole thousand pound weight would then be worth L.400 ; and, of course, L. 360 worth of goods ante- cedently allotted for the purchase of other commodities, must be added, in conse^ OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. '^5 quence of the increased demand, to the L. 50 worth, previously apphcable to llie acquisition of the one thousand pounds weight of sugar, when the sugar was at one shiUing a pound. In stating the effects of the diminution of one- hah' of the supply of sugar, it was observed, that the augmentation of the price might induce some of the consumers of su- gar, who preferred the full enjoyment of other things, to which they were habituated, to renounce, in whole or in part, the use of sugar ; and that the rise in its value, by the reduction in its quantity, might, in some degree, receive a check from this circum- stance. In like manner, when the value of sugar rises in any great degree by a sudden extension of demand, such as we have here supposed, it is obvious that a similar check to the rise of its value, will, to a certain ex- tent, be given, bv some of those who were habituated to enjoy sugar at one shilling a pound, not choosing to sacrifice to the ac- quisition of sugar so much of the other com- modities they were accustomed to enjoy, 76 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND as becomes necessary to obtain sugar in consequence of the rise in its value. The degree, however, in which this check will operate, as in the former case, must depend upon the nature of the commodity for which the extension of demand takes place. It is obvious, that no rise in value can induce men to renounce the acquisition of the necessaries of life, provided any sa- crifices they can make will procure them ; and this check will therefore operate, just in proportion to the degree of inclination which either necessity, habit, or taste, had created for the commodity ; that is, it will be more inconsiderable, in proportion as the inclination to obtain the usual quantity of it is less urgent. 4. Of the Effects of Diminution of Demand for any Commodity, on the Value of that Commodity, From what has been said on the three cases of the variation in the value of com- 7 OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 77 modities, which have been ah-eady consi- dered, it must be at first sight clear, that as this fourth, and only remaining circum- stance, which can cause variation of value in any commodity, again supposes an altera- tion in the proportion betwixt the demand for, and the quantity of, the commodity in which it takes place ; it must also produce effects similar to those that have already been described. If, for example, we suppose a society, whose usual supply of sugar amounted to one thousand pound weight, for which there existed a settled and steady demand ; should an alteration in the state of this so- ciety all at once induce them to be satis- fied with five hundred pounds weight, the demand would of course be reduced one- half Sugar must, therefore, become cheap- er ; and the natural desire in the growers of sugar to acquire, as nearly as possible, in exchange for their sugars, the quantity of other commodities that they were habituat- ed to enjoy, would lead them to force the market in such a manner, as to make the 78 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND one thousand pounds weight of sugar sell for a sum much smaller than the L. 50, which formed the value of the whole thousand pound weight, when sugar was at one shilling a pound. The reduction of the value of sugar might, as in the case of diminution of value by augmentation of quantity, create new sources of demand ; but as, in that case, it was observed, that the extent of the alteration of value depended upon the na- ture of the commodity, the extension of the quantity having always a more power- ful effect in reducing the value, in propor- tion to the degree in which the commodi- ty has been considered necessary ; so, in the present case, the alteration, which the reduction of demand operates, must also depend upon the nature of the commodity, and will be regulated on the same prin- ciple. Before concluding this subject, it is ne- cessary to remark, that though variations in value, whether produced by alteration of the quantity of commodities, or of the OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 79 demand for them, provided thej occasion similar alterations in the proportion, must produce the same effects upon the value of any commodity, or in the degree in which it forms a portion of individual riches ; yet they indicate very different effects on the state of public wealth : for it has already been observed, that, by the diminution of the quantity of a commodity, its value will be increased, though public opulence is by that means diminished ; and that an aug- mentation of the quantity of a commodity must diminish its value, though by this means the opulence of the society is in- creased. When, however, an increase of value is produced, by an augmentation of demand, or the value of any commodity is reduced by a diminution of demand, the public wealth of the community is, at the moment of the alteration in the demand, in every respect unchanged, notwithstand- ing the variation which takes place in in- dividual riches. Having now explained the manner in which the value of commodities, or the 80 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND degree in which they form a portion of individual riches, is affected ; Jirst^ By a diminution of the quantity of a commo- dity ; secondly. By an increase in its quan- tity ; thirdly, By an increase in the de- mand for it ; and, fourthly, By a dimi- nution of demand for it; I proceed to consider, what effect the alteration in the order of the expenditure (which a diminu- tion or augmentation in the value of any one commodity must produce) will, in each of these events, occasion on the sum-total of individual riches. * 1. Of the Effects of the Alteration in the Or- der of Expenditure, occasioned by a Di- minution in the Quantity of any Commo- dity. If, in any society, the quantity of sugar, as we have already supposed, be diminished from one thousand pounds weight to five hundred ; should the conjecture that has been made, to wit, that this might increase OF I.VDIVIDUAL RICHES. 81 the value of sugar from L. 50 to L. 200, be accurate ; it would be, at first sight, natu- ral to suppose, that the additional L. 150 worth of commodities, now applied to the purchase of sugar, which used to be em- ployed in the acquisition of other articles, would reduce the value of those articles just as much as the value of sugar was, by this means, increased ; and that, therefore, the sum-total of individual riches would remain the same. But a little attention must convince any one, after perusing the remarks which have been made on the consequence of alteration in demand, as well as on the effects of alteration in quan- tity, that this cannot be the case. As the tastes of men, as well as their at^ tachments to different habits, are various j if by any means they were induced to sa- crifice L. 150 worth of their other enjoy- ments to the acquisition of sugar, it is pro- bable that they would obtain this extra sum by a diminution of consumption, more or less, of every commodity which forms » portion of individual riches. S2 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND With a view, however, to explain the ef- fects of this derangement of expenditure, let us suppose that the tastes of men should lead them to procure the L. 150, the ad- vanced sum we have supposed to be neces- sary to obtain the five hundred pounds weight of sugar, by transferring to the ac- quisition of sugar a part of the commodi- ties which they formerly allotted to ob- tain the three articles of butchers-meat, wine, and mustard ; and let us further sup- pose, that the consumers of sugar actually withdrew L. 50 from the usual expendi- ture in each of these articles. If L. 50 worth of commodities usually allotted to the purchase of butchers-meat, was withdrawn from the acquisition of that article, the demand for butchers- meat must be diminished, and the established proportions betwixt the demand for it and the quantity of it, altered in such a manner as to reduce its value. But we have already shewn, that a diminution of demand for any commodity reduces the price of the whole commodity, much OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 83 more than the sum which rej3resents the amount of the demand that is abstracted from it ; and it is evident, that the natural avidity in the proprietors and retailers of butchers-meat, to acquire and consume the usual quantities of commodities, which they were accustomed to receive in ex- change for this article, would (as has been remarked in the case of the growers of su- gar) induce them to force the market to such a degree, as to render L. 50 a very in- adequate representation of the total dimi- nution of the value of all the butchers- meat in the market, which the abstracting of L. 50 worth of demand would create ; for, in reality, the value of the butchers- meat would be thus diminished in a much larger sum. It is obvious, too, that similar effects will be produced in the diminution of the value of mustard and of wine, by the supposed abstraction of L. 50 worth of commodi- ties, which used to be appropriated to the purchase of those articles. The eagerness of the growers and posses- 8^ OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND sors of each of these articles, to attain as nearly as possible the same quantity of commodities in exchange for it, must, as in every caseof diminution of demand, reduce the value of the article much more than the amount of the value of the demand ab- stracted. The effect, however, of abstract- mg L. 50 worth of demand from butchers- meat, from wine, and from mustard, must be very various in degree ; because, ab- stracting a demand to the extent of L. 50j must produce a very different effect on the proportion betwixt the demand for, and the quantity of each of these commodi- ties. It is plain that, whilst it might diminish the demand for mustard one-half, it might perhaps abstract only a fifth of the demand for wine ; whereas, in the case of the but- chers-meat, it might probably annihilate only a twentieth or a thirtieth of the usual demand : and as this would have very dif- ferent effects in altering the proportion be- twixt the quantity and the demand of each of these articles, so it must alter, in a very OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 85 different ratio, the value of a given quanti- ty of each ; which has already been exem- plified in the calculation quoted from Davenant concerning the price of corn. * 2. Of the Effects of the Alteration in the Or-^ der of Expenditure, occasioned by an In- crease of Demand for any Commodity » As we already know, that an augmenta- tion of demand, if it establishes similar pro- portions betwixt the demand for, and the value of, any commodity, must produce si- milar effects upon the value of any por- tion of it ; let us suppose, instead of the supply of sugar being reduced from one thousand pound weight to five hundred, that the supply remaining the same, (to wit, one thousand pound weight,) there should arise a sudden demand for two thousand pound weight. On this supposition, if we were right in conjecturing, that sugar, by the diminution of the one-half of its quantity, * See page 54. 86 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND would rise to eight shillings a pound, su- gar must then also rise to the same price, in consequence of the increased demand ; and the value of the whole one thousand pound weight of sugar would of course be L. 400. In this case, instead of L. 150 worth of goods being abstracted from the acqui- sition of other commodities, it is evi- dent the consumers of sugar would be un- der the necessity of abstracting L. 350 worth of articles, which they antecedent- ly devoted to the acquisition of other en- joyments ; and if we suppose their tastes, in like manner, to lead them to procure this sum, by curtailing their consumption of butchers-meat, wine, and mustard, there would be, all at once, a deficiency in the ordinary demand for each of these articles to the extent of the third part of this L. 350; that is, to the extent of L. 116, 13s. 4d., which would produce a much more formidable diminution in the value of butchers-meat, wine, and mustard, than was occasioned by abstracting L. 50 worth of demand from each ; and of course im- OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 87 poverish, in a much greater degree, the proprietors of those articles. It is extremely important here to ob- serve, that though, by this means, the mass of individual riches would be much dimi- nished, yet this last hypothesis proceeds upon the idea, that sugar, butchers-meat, wine, and mustard, should all of them exist in the same quantities ; and, indeed, that the state of no one commodity what- ever should be altered : that is, that the wealth of the nation should remain exactly the same ; the diminution of individual riches, being, in this instance, alone crea- ted in consequence of a supposed change of taste, which produces a sudden alteration in the demand for one commodity. Further, though the consequences of this sudden demand for an increased quantity of sugar, in reducing the value of butchers- meat, wine, and mustard, of which we have attempted to give a view, must have a con- siderable effect on the diminution of the mass of individual riches, by its operation on the value of these'three articles ; its ef- S8 OP iPUBLTC WEALTH, AND fects will not terminlite here : for the pi*o- prietors of butchers-meat, wine, and mus- tard, having, from the reduction of the Va- lue of their property, less to bestow on their different enjoyments, the demand for other commodities must be by this means diminished, and that, in every case, to a greater degree than the amount of the sum which represents the demand abstracted ; for it is important always to recollect, that every abstraction of demand must produce a diminution in the sum-total of the value of the commodity from which it is abstract- ed, greater than is expressed by the sum abstracted. It is on this principle, that a great and sudden alteration of demand for any com- modity or class of commodities, has been always found to produce a fatal diminution of individual riches, though the wealth of the nation remains unaltered and unchang- ed ; and this is a proposition the truth of which does not depend upon any theory. The merchants of this country have severe- ly felt it, both at the commencement of th^ Ot INDIVIDUAL RICHES. ^ last, and of the present war. * It is the knowledo;e mercantile men derive from ex- perience of the calamitous effects of a sud- den alteration of demand, that leads them often to declare, (what to those who have not studied the subject appears ridiculous,) that they prefer even the calamities of con- tinued warfare, with all its attendants, such as advanced wages, increased freights, and insurances, to a fluctuation betwixt war and peace ; and the theory here advanced explains the grounds of the assertion. Indeed, nothing can more forcibly illus- trate the truth of this doctrine, than the events which happened at the commence- ment of the last war. The sudden demand for all those articles which warfare makes * The foUovting statement of bankruptcies, taken from th^ London Gazette, seems to shew, that the effect oi this de- rangement of expenditure, is felt, mure or less, at the com- mencement of every war, Bankruptciei. Bankruptcies. Bankruptcies. .1752,-158 1I774, -.S60 (17«4, - 51? \ 1753, '214 X J 1778, -675 In ) 1791,- 604 Iii< 1754, - 244 ") 1779^ -544 )1792, - 628 1 1756, - 278 ( 1780, - 449 C1793, - 1304 ^1757,-274 90 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND necessary, abstracting a large portion of the demand from the commodities prepared and preparing for the market, on the sup- position it was to remain in the usual state, diminished thereby the value of the commodities on hand to such a degree, that the merchants and manufacturers were incapable of making good their engage- ments. In this situation. Government aided the mercantile interest with loans of money, in two hundred and thirty-eight different cases, amounting in all nearly to two mil- lion two hundred thousand pounds. * This empowered the merchants to retain their goods for a time ; and as the quantity im- ported and manufactured was soon cur- tailed, in consequence of the effects of the war, the proportion came within a short time to be restored betwixt the demand and the quantity, in such a manner, that the com.modities resuming their former value, those who received assistance were * TheexHCl sum was L. 2,202,200. OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 91 enabled to repay Government without any loss ; which was to be expected, because, though the value of the commodities was diminished in consequence of the sudden alteration of demand, they remained in substance : the wealth of the nation was in fact nowise affected by it ; and the goods in hand were sure to resume their value, whenever, by the diminution of supply, the proportion came to be restored betwixt the quantity of them and the demand for them. * * It is perhaps unfortunate, that the cause of this evil, as well as the mode in which the relief operated, never was suf- ficiently explained ; otherwise it would have been impossible, that similar relief should have been refused at the commence- ment of the present war; because, as the evil originates with measures which Ministers think it necessary to take for the public safety, it is not alone views of expedience which ought to induce government to aid the mercantile interest, for the merchants must appear to have in equity a right to such as- sistance. ^2 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND 3. Of the Effects of the Alteration in the Or- der of Expenditure, occasioned by an In- crease in the Quantity of any Commodity, The variation likely to be effected in the value of a commodity, by an increase of its quantity, has been already traced out and exemplified, by supposing the usual supply of sugar in any society to be Jit once increased from one to two thousand pound weight. The reduction of the va- lue of that article, which must naturally ensue from the manner the growers of su- gar will be induced to press it on the mar- ket, in consequence of their avidity to ob- tain the usual quantity of the objects of their desire, has been pointed out ; and it appears obvious, that the consequence of thus reducing the sum-total of commodi- ties applicable to the acquisition of sugar, must be, that a part of what was formerly applied to the purchase of this article, be- coming unappropriated, will remain in the hands of the consumers of sugar, to be used OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 93 for the acquisition of such other commodi- ties as are most suitable to their taste. For these articles, therefore, whatever they may be, there must of course be an additional demand ; and the value of each of them must rise just in proportion, as more or less of the goods formerly applied to the acquisition of sugar, is now appropri- ated to acquire that particular article. Though reason teaches us, that this must be the case, it is not alone to be inferred from theory and speculation. In practice, the effect of a great increase of the quanti- ty of a commodity, in raising the price of other commodities, has been long a matter of notoriety. It has been long a common and constant remark of those who habitu- ally attend to the value of public securities, that the price of stock, in a fertile season, will stand perceptibly higher, by two or three per cent., than in a year of scarcity. Grain is, indeed, the article most neces- sary to man ; and as mankind must gene- rally enjoy nearly a sufficiency of that on which their existence depends, a sudden in- 94 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND crease in the quantity of such an article, must, as has been shewn, produce a greater diminution in its value, than a proportion- able increase of quantity would produce in the value of articles of taste; because there is hardly a possibility of conceiving a sud- den source of extended demand, and of means of satisfying that demand, for a thing of which every man must have near- ly enough ; whereas, the reduction of va- lue produced in articles of taste, by a simi- lar increase of quantity, (which, after this increase, will still remain comparatively scarce,) must create new sources of demand for them, long before their value can be materially reduced. The effect, therefore, of an increase in the quantity of grain, in raising the price of other commodities, must be more easily perceived; but there is no commodity what- ever, of which the quantity can b^ increas- ed so as to diminish its value, without oc- casioning an augmentation of the value of some other article. 10 OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 95 4, Of the Effects of the Alternations in the Or- der of Expenditure, occasioned by a Dimi- nution of Demand for any Commodity, As there never exists a desire, and conse- quently a demand, for any commodity, but from the circumstance of its power to satisfy either the appetite or taste of mankind; so there never exists a diminution in the demand for any commodity, but — either in consequence of a rise in the value of some other commodity, the full enjoy- ment of which man prefers, making it ne- cessary to abstract some part of the com- modities usually appropriated to the acqui- sition of it, that by their means he may obtain, as nearly as possible, his usual quantity of the commodity he prefers ; — or in consequence of something being disco- vered better adapted to satisfy the same de- sires. It appears, therefore, that the effects in the alteration of the order of expenditure occasioned bv a diminution in the demand 96 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND for any commodity, have been already con- sidered, and treated of under the head of the effects in the alteration of the order of expenditure occasioned by the increuae in the demand for any commodity. This part of the subject was there il- lustrated, by pointing out the consequen- ces of diminution of demand for the ar- ticles of butchers-meat, wine, and mustard : it is, therefore, here only necessary to repeat, that the effects in the diminution of demand for any article, never terminate by diminishing the value of the commodity in relation to which they take place ; be- cause, as the proprietor of that commodity must, by the diminution of its value, have less to bestow on the acquisition of the va- rious objects of desire he was accustomed to enjoy, so a diminution in demand must also take place with regard to them ; and the same consequences must, indirectly through them, ensue with relation to other commodities, which the possessor of this last class of goods was habituated to enjoy. Though it seems established by the fore- OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 97 going reasoning, that an augmentation in the riches of individuals may be attended with a diminution of wealth, that the riches of individuals may be diminished by a so- ciety's becoming more wealthy, and that, while the wealth of the community remains unaltered in every particular, there may be, from the circumstance of variation in de- mand, a diminution or augmentation in the sum-total of individual riches ; (though, in- deed, it can seldom happen, that an increase of the one should produce a similnr increase in the other ;) yet there is a possibility that the mass of individual riches may be so augmented under such circumstances, that the increase will indicate a proportional aug- mentation of the wealth of the communitv. Let us .suppose, for instance, that the supply of sugar should suddenly increase in any society ; for example, from one thousand to fifteen hundred pound weight ; and that the demand should increase in the same proportion : let us further sup- pose, that every person who grew or fabri- cated any commodity with which sugar was 98 OF PUBLIC WEALTti, AND purchased, should have, in like manner, produced an extra quantity of various ar- ticles, for which the growers of sugar should have also a proportionably increased de- mand. Then, as the hypothesis implies, that, in every instance, there would be maintained the same proportion which ex- isted antecedent to the increase of produc- tion, both betwixt the quantity and demand for each of the commodities usually sa(3ri- ficed to the acquisition of sugar, and be- twixt the demand for, and quantity of, su- gar itself; the increase of value must be, in such a case, exactly proportioned to the increase of quantity ; that is, the mass of individual riches, and the wealth of the community, will increase in the same pro- portion. It follows then, that, when we come to examine, whether the wealth of the society will really be augmented by any proposed regulations, {as men are only interested in soliciting legislative arrangements in con- sequence of their effect in increasing indi- vidual riches,) we must consider ; — OF INDIVIDUAL RICHES. QQ 1. Whether that augmentation of indivi- dual riches is produced solely by the dimi- nution of the quantity of any commodity. 2. Whether it is produced solely by an augmentation of demand for any commo- dity. For, in the first of these cases, there must of necessity be a diminution of public wealth ; — in the second, public wealth will neither be increased nor diminished ; and, in both cases, though there will be an im- mediate increase of individual riches, as far as the value of one commodity contributes; yet, in consequence of the derangement of expenditure, there will be a much greater diminution in the value of other commodi- ties, and, of course, a great falling off in the general mass of individual riches. If, however, we find, that the means proposed tend to increase proportionably both thequantity of, and the demand for, any commodity, and at the same time to create funds for the acquisition of this ad- ditional quantity, without diminishing the demand for any other commodity, it may 100 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND be then considered as a proposition which will undoubtedly augment, in the same proportion, both the riches of individuals, and the wealth of the society. For example : if the supply of sugar is increased from one thousand to fifteen hun- dred pound weight, and there should, that year, be produced by the consumers of su- gar an extra quantity of grain, (for which the growers of sugar should have a de- mand,) just sufficient to pay for the increas- ed quantity of sugar ; then, as the propor- tion betwixt the demand for, and the quan- tity of, sugar would be preserved, notwith- standing the increased supply ; and as the proportion would be in like manner preserv- ed in relation to grain, and nowise alter- ed in any other commodity ; the increase of individual riches would be in direct pro- portion to the increase of the quantity of grain and sugar : that is, public wealth and individual riches would increase in similar proportions. But if it should appear, that the means proposed tend only to create a rise in the OP INDIVIDUAL RICHES. 101 demand and the quantity of one commo- dity, — of sugar for example ; and that this additional quantity of sugar is to be paid for, by abstracting a portion of commodi- ties from the acquisition of other objects of desire ; then the wealth of the community may indeed be increased in the same pro- portion with individual riches in the single article of sugar : that is, the quantity of sugar and the value of it will increase in the same proportion. But the diminution of demand for other commodities, from the purchase of which there was abstracted that which is now applied to the acquisi- tion of the additional quantity of sugar, must reduce the price of them so as to dimi- nish the mass of individual riches ; because, as has been already explained, the abstrac- tion of demand to a given amount always sinks the value of the commodity from whence the demand is abstracted, to a much greater amount than the value ab- stracted. For instance : if the growers of grain, whom we suppose to have had a demand 102 OF PUBLIC WEALTH, AND for, and to have purchased the increased quantity of, sugar, instead of having an in- creased quantity of grain to pay for it, had paid for it by abstracting from the acquisi- tion of butchers-meat, wine, and mustard, a quantity of grain which they formerly sa- crificed to the purchase of these commodi- ties; then the reduction of the price of these articles, in consequence of the diminution of demand for them, must (notwithstand- ing the wealth of the public, and the mass of riches, are proportionably increased in as far as sugar is concerned) occasion a di- minution in the mass of individual riches ; because the diminution upon those articles must be much greater than the increase in the value of sugar. The conclusion is therefore inevitable, that there exists only one case, and that a very improbable one, — (to wit, when the quantity and the demand for any commodi- ty are proportionally increased, and funds at the same time are created for the acqui- sition of the increased quantity, as well as the satisfaction of the increased demand,)— OP INX)IVIDUAL RICHES. 103 in which an increase in the mass of indivi- dual riches produces a similar efFecton the wealth of the community. It is further necessary to remark, that, when variations in value, or in the mass of individual riches, are created by alterations in the quantity of any commodity, the op- posite effect in all cases immediately takes place in public wealth. A diminution of the value of a commodity, in consequence of aji alteration of its quantity, is an inva- riable symptom of an immediate increase of its quantity; and of course of an increase of public wealth : an augmentation of the value of a commodity, in consequence of an alteration of its quantity, is an invari- able symptom of an immediate diminution of its quantity, and consequently of a dimi- nution of public wealth. But if there is a diminution in the value of a commodity, in consequence of a vari- ation in the demand for it, this is no symp- tom of an immediate alteration in the quantity of the commodity; but it is a sure presage uf future diminution of its quanti- 10 they are right in this assumption, is un- doubted, that during the course of the day he can have added nothing of value to the stock of the nation. The ingenious men, who hold these opi- nions, distinguished for a close, subtile, and nervous manner of maintaining them, have not, with all their ingenuity, done so much to support this doctrine, as the author of the Wealth of Nations, by the manner he has attempted to refute it. " The capital error of this system," says Dr Smith, " seems to lie in its representing " the class of artificers, manufacturers, and *' merchants, as altogether barren and un- ** productive. The following observations " may serve to show the impropriety of " this representation. " 1. This class, it is acknowledged, re- " produces annually the value of its own " annual consumption, and continues, at " least, the existence of the stock or capital ** which maintains and employs it. But " upon this account alone the denomina- " tion of barren or unproductive should I 130 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. " seem to be very improperly applied to it. " We should not call a marriage barren or " unproductive, though it produced only a " S07t and a daughter, to replace the father " and mother ; and though it did not in- " crease the number of the human species, ^' but only continued it as it was before. " Farmers and country labourers, indeed, " over and above the stock which maintains " and employs them, reproduce annually a " neat produce, a free rent to the landlord. " As a marriage which affords three chil- " dren is certainly more productive than " one which affords only two ; so the la- " bour of farmers and country labourers is " certainly more productive than that of " merchants, artificers, and manufacturers. " The superior produce of the one class, ^ however, does not render the other bar- *' ren or unproductive." * Now this com- parison really appears, instead of a refu- tation, to be a confirmation of the doc- trine of the economists ; and even to * Wealth of Nations, Vol. II. p. 272. 4to edit. OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 131 carry along with it an avowal of the opi- nion, that manufacturing labour is not productive of an increase of wealth. A marriage which only produces two, cannot increase the numbers of the human species ; for these two (as is observed) can only supply the places of the father and mother. The inference, therefore, appears to be, that, as such a marriage can only continue, and nowise contribute to the in- crease of, the human species, so manufac- turing labour, as the economists strictly hold, can only preserve the wealth of the nation undiminished, notwithstanding the consumption of the manufacture; but can nowise contribute to its increase. " 2. It seems, upon this account, alto- " gether improper to consider artificers, " manufacturers, and merchants, in the " same light as menial servants. The la- " hour of menial servants does not conti- " nue the existence of the fund which " maintains and employs them. Their " maintenance and employment is altoge- " ther at the expence of their masters, and 132 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. *^ the work which they perform is not of a " nature to repay that expence. That work " consists in services which perish general- " ly in the very instant of their perform- " ance, and does not fix or reaUze itself in " any vendible commodity which can re- " place the value of their wages and maiu' " tenance. The labour, on the contrary, of " artificers, manufacturers, and merchants, " naturally does fix and realize itself in " some such vendible commodity. It is " upon this account, that, in the chapter in " which I treat of productive and unpro- " ductive labour, I have classed artificers, " manufacturers, and merchants, among the " productive labourers, and menial ser- " vants among the barren or unproduc- « tive." * Here, without stating any further objec- tion to the opinion that is meant to be re- futed, the outline is given of that distinc- tion betwixt productive and unproductive labour, which is maintained by the Author: * Wtalth of Nations, \'oI. II. p. 273. 4to edit. OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 133 the merits of which must be considered in the proper place. " 3. It seems upon every supposition " improper to say, that the labour of artifi- " cers, manufacturers, and merchants, does " not increase the real revenue of the so- " ciety. Though we should suppose, for " example, as it seems to be supposed in " this system, that the value of the daily, " monthly, and yearly consumption of this " class, was exactly equal to that of its *' daily, monthly, and yearly production ; *' yet it would not from thence follow, that " its labour added nothing to the real re- " venue, to the real value of the annual " produce of the land and labour of the so- " ciety. An artificer, for example, who, ** in the first six months after harvest, exe- " cutes L. 10 worth of work, though he ••' should, in the same time, consume L. 10 " worth of corn and other necessaries, yet " really adds the value of L. 10 to the an- " nual produce of the land and labour of " the society. While he has been consuming " a half-yearly revenue of L. 10 worth of 134i OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. '* corn and other necessaries, he has pro- s' duced an equal value of work, capable of " purchasing either to himself, or to some " other person, an equal half-yearly revenue. *^ The value, therefore, of what has been '' consumed and produced during these ** six months, is equal, not to L. 10, but to ** L. 20. It is impossible, indeed, that no " more than L. 10 worth of this value may " ever have existed at any one moment of " time. But if the L. 10 worth of corn, " and other necessaries which were consum- " ed by the artificer, had been consumed " by a soldier or by a menial servant, the " value of that part of the annual produce " which existed at the end of the six " months, would have been L. 10 less than " it actually is, in consequence of the labour " of the artificer. Though the value of what " the artificer produces, therefore, should " not, at any one moment of time, be sup- " posed greater than the value he consumes, " yet at every moment of time, the actual- " ly existing value of goods in the mar- " ket is, in consequence of what he pro- 11 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 135 " duces, greater than it otherwise would " be." * The wealth of the nation is undoubtedly greater, at every moment of time, than it would be if the manufacturer was supposed to consume without working, or adding any value to the raw material ; but on the hypothesis here stated, that the workman, in the first six months after harvest, should execute L. 10 worth of work, and that in the same time he should consume L. 10 worth of corn and other necessaries, as he has subtracted from the national capital a sum equal to that which he has added to it, if wealth is regarded as dependent on exchangeable value, it is difficult to per- ceive how he should be deemed to have in- creased the national stock by such an ex- istence. Triumphantly, however, as tiiis leading tenet of the economists seems to have with- stood this attack, it is impossible to sub- scribe to the opinion, that the labour of the * Wealth of Nations, ubi supra. 136 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. manufacturer and the artist are totally un- productive of wealth. There are two modes of viewing this subject. Wealth may be regarded as con- stituted by price or exchangeable value; or it may be viewed in the real light in which it ought to be considered, as con- sisting in the abundance of the objects of man's desire. If we regard wealth to be constituted by exchangeable value, and agree in the max- im, that value is the basis of all riches, and that an increase of value is an increase of riches, there seems to be an end of the question; for, in that view of the subject, it is as impossible to contend, that the la- bour of the manufacturer or artist does not add something to the wealth of the nation, as it is impossible to believe that a painter, whose works have sold for thousands of pounds, and the value of which has been known to have increased for a century after his death, added nothing more to the va- lue of the canvas than the value of his sus- 10 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 187 tenance, and an equivalent for the expehce of his education. If, on the other hand, wealth is consider- ed as it ought to be, as consisting of the greatest possible abundance of the objects of men's desires, this question requires a little further investigation. It may be said, that, according to this opinion, abundance, in proportion to de- mand, constitutes wealth; but that abun- dance, in proportion to demand, must al- ways diminish price. It may even be said, that it has been explained, how, if pushed to an extreme, it must extinguish value ; that as long, however, as exchangeable va- lue exists unextinguished by public opu- lence, the lowest possible price of all the productions of art must be the sustenance of the artist ; for without receiving this, he could not exist : and it may be alleged, that, on this principle, it therefore seems, that the wages which denote the greatest degree of public opulence in works of art, are those which equal in vahie the subsist- enceof the artist. 138 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. The value really added by the manufac- turer to the raw material, in the present state of things, is, in this view of the sub- ject, conceived to proceed from the scarci- ty of manufacturing skill. Like the price of monopoly, it is the highest that can be got. The talent of the artist being rare, from the small number of them that arrive at perfection in the arts, is supposed to im- pose a tax upon the public, which would not exist if the nation had a greater num- ber of them ; that is, if it possessed greater opulence in artists : and it is undoubtedly true, that it is possible to imagine talents so multiplied, and the number of artists so abundant, as to reduce the wages of paint- ers and sculptors to be no more than what is equivalent to their sustenance ; and that, in this state, a nation would enjoy the greatest possible degree of opulence in the productions of art, consistent with the ex- istence of exchangeable value. But this is, unfortunately, a situation which can exist only in imagination. The monopoly arising from skill, talent, and OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 139 genius, is not an evil proceeding from the absurd regulations of man ; it is stamped on the human species by the hand of na- ture, and must exist as long as genius a- dorns the world. There is great difference in the value of land. One field possesses much more in- trinsic fertility than another ; and it is true, that if a happy convulsion of nature was at once to render the whole face of the earth equally fertile, we should cease to remark on the fertility of that favourite spot, on the same principle that we should cease to value the labour of the manufacturer and the artist, if he was equalled in skill, taste, and dexterity, by every common labourer. But as long as the world remains constitut- ed as it is, we must continue to admire the fertility of the field, and to consider the la- bour of the manufacturer and the artist as productive. It must also be remarked, that, even if the nature of things were so far altered that the works of the manufacturer and artist should become so abundant in proportion 140 OP THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. to the demand for them as universally to r€duce tlie wages of manufacturers and art- ists to what in value was merely equiva- lent to their sustenance, (if wealth truly consists in the abundance of the objects of man's desire,) we should be obliged, as long as the love of conveniency and taste is in- cident to mankind, to consider the manu- facturer and artist as productive labour- ers, on the same principle that we have regarded water as an article of public wealth. In truth, it is only from the circumstance of confounding wealth and riches, and con- sidering wealth, in the course of their rea- soning, at one time as depending on ex- changeable value, and at another as consti- tuted by the abundance of the objects of man's desire, that this doctrine of the eco- nomists can for a moment be maintained. For supposing that an artist or manufac- turer added only the value of his mainte- nance to the raw material, if wealth is to be understood in its true sense, his labour, even in this case, must be considered as OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 141 productive of wealth. The nourishment on which he subsists is wealth, because it is an object of man's desire. In satisfying the desire of the labourer, it has fulfilled the duty it is destined to perform ; whilst, on the other hand, in consequence of the form given to the raw material by his industry, a distinct portion of wealth is brought into existence, ready to satisfy the desire of some other individual ; so that, admitting that at no one period there existed, in consequence of his industry, an additional value, still it is evident that, in consequence of the in- dustry of the manufacturer, there is a por- tion of desire satisfied, and of course a por- tion of wealth created, which would not otherwise have existed. These philosophers hold, (and it is a ne- cessary inference from their doctrine,) tlmt it is immaterial to a country whether a web of cloth is exported in exchange for foreign commodities, or whether the same commo- dities are acquired by exporting the wool of which the cloth is made, and the food on which the weaver has existed. Nay, the v 142 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH'. even conceive, that the exportation of the raw materials is the most advantageous » * There is obviously, however, a material dif- ference ; for, in the former case, the coun- try acquires as much of foreign commodity as in the latter ; and, besides that, one of its inhabitants is maintained : that is, he has enjoyed his share of public wealth, hy obtaining the objects of his de- sire. By the author of the Wealth of Nations, the manufacturer and the artist are indeed admitted to be productive labourers ; and, in this respect the distinction he makes be- twixt productive and unproductive labour, is less repugnant to the prevalent opinions of men ; but a little examination will shew that it is not more consonant to reason. * " Si I'un conbldeie simplemeiit le commerce d'exportation " dans un royaume agricole, qui peut deveiiird'un grand com- " merce exterieur des denrees du cru, lequel doit etre favorise " preferablement h tout autre." — '* If one considers merely the " commerce of exportation in an agricultural kingdom, that " can acquire a great external commerce, by disposing of its •' raw materials, which ought to be favoured in preference of " every other species of commerce." Philosopliie Riircde, p. 371. OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 143 He considers as unproductive labourers all thos'e whose " services perish in the very " instant of their performance, and does " not fix or realize itself in any vendible " commodity, which can replace the value '* of their wages and maintenance." * Pro- ductive labour, on the contrary, he describes as " fixing and realizing itself in some par- " ticular subject and vendible commodity. " It is as it were a certain quantity of la- " bour stocked and stored up, to be em- " ployed, if necessary, upon some other oc- " casion. That subject, or, w^hich is the " same thing, the price of that subject, can " afterwards, if necessary, put into motion " a quantity of labour equal to that which " had originally produced it." f Unfortunately, however, a little consider- ation makes this distinction appear nowise founded on the nature of labour, but mere- ly dependant upon the use that is made of its produce. This the same labour may * Wealth of Nations, Vol. 11. p. 273. 4to edit. + Ibid. Vol. I. p. 401. 144- OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. appear either productive or unproductive, according to the use subsequently made of the commodity on which it was bestowed. If my cook, for example, makes a tart which I immediately consume, he is considered as an unproductive labourer ; and the act of making the tart as unproductive labour; because that service has perished at the mo- ment of its performayice ; but if the same labour is pe;rformed in a pastry cook's shop, it becomes productive labour, because it is a quantity/ of labour stocked and stored uj), to be employed^ if necessary^ upon some other occasion ; the price of it, if necessary^ can afterwards put into motion a quantity of labour equal to that which had originally pro^ duced it. Again : A piece of cloth burnt immediately after it was formed, would in- evitably bestow, according to this defini'- tion, the character of unproductive on the labour of the cloth-manufacturer. Thus, a tart being placed in a cook's shop, would give to the labour of the cook the charac- ter of productive, and the cloth being put OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 145 in the fire, bestows that of unproductive on the labour of the manufacturer. This extraordinary distinction, founded on the i^ere durability of the services per- formed, classes as unproductive labourers, some of those who are occupied in render- ing the most important services to society. Thus the Sovereign, and all who are em- ployed in the maintenance of the religion, the justice, or the defence of the state, as well as those whose skill and care are oc- cupied in superintending the health and education of the society, are alike deemed unproductive labourers. * If exchangeable value is to be consi- dered as the basis of wealth, it is need- less to use much argument to explain the errors of this doctrine. The practice of mankind, in estimating these services, if we can judge by what is paid for them, bears sufficient testimony of its inaccuracy. If, on the other hand, wealth is regard- ed in its true light, as consisting of the * Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 401, 4to edit. K 146 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. abundance of the objects of man's desire, it is impossible to discern why that should not be considered as wealth which tends to the satisfaction of man's immediate desires, as well as that which is stocked and stored up for the satisfaction of his future desires. It is curious that the theory of the econo- mists should have led them to exclude the grain reserved for seed from forming a portion of wealth, because devoted to the formation of what is to administer to our future desires ; whilst, on the other hand, the author of the Wealth of Nations ex- cludes the labour of the class he describes as unproductive labour, merely because it contributes to the satisfaction of the imme- diate desires of those who employ them. In truth, however, be cannot maintain this opinion with any degree of consist- ency, for there is no one who has ridi- culed the idea of considering the durability of commodities as the criterion of their value, with greater acrimony, than the person who makes this distinction be- twixt productive and unproductive labour, OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. liy grounded upon the duration of its pro- duce. " We do not (says he) reckon that " trade disadv intageous, which consists in " the exchange of the hardware of Enojland " for the wines of France, and yet hardware " is a very durable commodity, and was it " not for this continual exportation, might, " too, be accumulated for ages together, to " the inci edible augmentation of the pots " and pans of the country." * Again : it is a losing trade, it is said, " which a work- " man carries on with the ale-house ; and ** the trade which a manufacturing nation " would naturally carry on with a wine " country, may be considered as a trade " of the same nature. I answer, that the " trade with the ale-house is not necessa- " rily a losing trade." f It appears, therefore, impossible to con- tend, that the labour of the manufacturer and artist, or even the labour of that class whose services perish at the moment, are * Wealth of Nations, Vol. 11. p. 15. 4to edit. \ Ibid. p. 80. 148 OF TJIE SOURCES OF WEALf S. not, as well as that of the husbandman, to be considered as productive of wealth. The comparative degree of utility of different descriptions of labour in producing wealth, is a subject which will be more properly discussed in treating of the means of in- creasing wealth. 3. Of Capital^ as a Source of Wealth* In treating of land as a source of wealth, it was unnecessary to enter into any discus-^ sion of the means by which it contributes towards the public stock. These it evident- ly derives from the produce of mines and fisheries, and from the materials for food and clothing that abound on the face of the earth. This discussion was equally unne- cessary in treating of labour as a source of wealth. It is clear, that the labour of the husbandman contributes to the formation of wealth, by means of the increased ferti- lity he creates ; and though it has been dis- puted whether the manutacturer and me- OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 14D nial servant produce wealth, by adapting and preparing the raw material for our convenient consumption, yet it is self-evi- dent, that if they increase the wealth of the nation, it is by giving form to the raw ma- terial, and preparing it for use. By what means capital or stock contri- butes towards wealth is not so apparent. What is the nature of the profit of stock? and how does it originate ? are questions the answers to which do not immediately suggest themselves. They are, indeed, questions that have seldom been discussed by those who have treated on political eco- nomy ; and, important as they are, they seem nowhere to have received a satisfac- tory solution. The author of the Wealth of Nations appears to consider the profit of stock, as paid out of, and therefore derived from, the value added by the workman to the raw material. He states, that — " As soon. " as stock has accumulated in the hands of " particular persons, some of them will na- " turally employ it in setting to work in- l50 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. " dustrious people, whom they will supply " with materials and subsistence, in order " to make a profit by the sale of their " work, or by what their labour adds to " the value of the materials. In exchang- " ing the complete manufacture, either for *' money, for labour, or for other goods, " over and above what may be sufficient " to pay the price of the materials, and the " wages of the workmen, something must " be given for the profits of the undertaker " of the work who hazards his stock in this " adventure. The value which the work- " men add to the materials, therefore, re- <« solves itself, in this case, into two parts, " of which the one pays their wages, the " other the profits of their employer upon " the whole stock of materials and wages " which he advanced." * And again, " The " labour of a manufacturer adds generally " to the value of the materials which he " works upon, that of his own maintenance " and of his master's profit." f • Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 57, 4to edit, f Ibid. p. 400. The following passage also clearly shows that Jjr Smith thought the profit of stock was a value added f OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 151 Above a century ago, Mr Locke stated pretty nearly the same opinion. " Land," says he, " produces naturally something " new and profitable, and of value to man- " kind ; but money is a barren thing and '^ produces nothing ; but by compact trans- " fers that profit that was the reward of " one man's labour into another man's " pocket." * If this, however, was a just and accurate idea of the profit of capital, it would fol- low, that the profit of stock must be a deri- vative, and not an original source of reve- nue ; and capital could not therefore be considered as a source of wealth, its profit being only a transfer from the pocket of by the labourer : '* The stock which is lent at interest is always *' considered as a capital by the lender. He expects that in " due time it is to be restored to him, and that in the mean " time the borrower is to pay him a certain annual rent for the '• use of it. The borrower may use it either as a capital, or " as a stock reserved for immediate consumption. If he uses " it as a capital, he employs it in the maintenance of produc- " tive labourers, who reproduce the value with a profit." Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 42ff. • Some Considerations of the Consequence of lowering In- terest, and raising the Value of Money. Edition I692, p. 55|, 152 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. the labourer into that of the proprietor of stock. The ingenious author of the Treatise on the Formation and Distribution of Riches, seems to think, that a proprietor of stock is entitled to a compensation for what his capital would have produced him, had he employed it in the acquisition of land. * But this in practice is known not even to furnish a rule for the quantum of profit. This account of the origin of capital, however unsatisfac- tory, is also given by Sir William Petty, as well as many other authors. " Question 28. What is interest or use-money ? Answer. " A reward for forbearing the use of your own money for a *' term of time agreed upon, Avhatsoever need yourself may " have of it in the mean while." Sir William Petty's Quantiilumcunque, concerning money. " Money was at all times, and in all places, admitted to be " an equivalent for houses and lands ; and houses and lands *' were always admitted to possess the quality of producing a " rent. Now, if houses and lands do (of natural right) ac- " tually possess this-quality of producing a rent, and money be ** actually an equivalent for houses and lands, it must neces- " sarily follow that money must (by the same natural right) " possess the quality of producing a rent also." Essay on the Nature and Principles of Public Credit. By S. Gale, printed 1784, p. 15. * Reflection sur la Formation et Distribution des Richesses. Par M. Turgot, ^60 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 158 and certainly gives no idea, how or from whence it originates. Capital is so variously employed, that in order to convey a just and distinct idea of the mode in which, under all circumstan- ces, it becomes entitled to a profit, it is ne- cessary to enumerate the different uses to which it may be devoted. 1. It may be employed by the manufac- turer in building and obtaining machinery. 2. It may be employed in procuring and conveying to the manufacture the raw ma- terials, in advance of wages, or conveying the manufactured commodity to the mar- ket, and furnishing it to the consumer 5 that is, in the home-trade. 3. It may be employed either in the im- portation of the commodities of another country, or the exportation of home-manu- factures ; that is, in foreign trade. 4. It may be employed in agriculture, 5. There is a part of the capital of every country employed merely for the purpose of circulation ; a greater or a smaller pro- portion of which is necessary for conduct- 154 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. ijig the transactions of every member of the community. In enumerating the various modes in which capital may be employed, with a view to consider how it becomes entitled to a profit, it is unnecessary to state that of lending it on landed, and that of lending it on personal security. If lent to the pro- prietor of land, the owner of the capital becomes, under certain conditions, a partr ner and joint proprietor in t|je land. If lent to a person who has no land, the pro- prietor of the capital, under similar condi- tions, becomes a sharer either in the pro- fits of professional labour, or of stock, ac- cording as the borrower derives his revenue from his labour or his capital. Thus the profit which capital lent out acquires, is a transfer from one to another of what al- ready exists, and cannot, therefore, proper- ly, be said to be produced. It appears, then, that every means of employing capital, so as to produce a pro- fit, is described under some one of these five modes enumerated, by which capital be- OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 155 comes entitled to a profit. On examina- tion, we shall find, that even when so em- ployed, part of its profit, in some cases, may be more properly said to be acquired than produced. Now, it is apprehended, that in every in- stance where capital is so employed as to produce a profit, it uniformly arises, either — -from its supplanting a portion oj labour, which would otherwise be performed by the hand of man ; or, — from its performing a portion oj labour^ which is beyond the reach of the fcrsonal eocertioii of man to accom-r plish. 1. Of the Method in xchich that Portion of Capital produces its Profit, which is em- ployed in Building and obtaining Machi- nery, There is no part of the capital of a coun- try, that more obviously derives its profit from supplanting a portion of labour that would otherwise be performed by man, or 156 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. from performing a portion which is beyond the reach of his personal exertion, than that which is vested in machinery. That man uses capital in the form of machinery to supplant labour, is one of the peculiarities and distinguishing features of his charac- ter. If it was not for this singular faculty, his efforts to provide for his wants, like those of the other animals, would be bound- ed by what his hands, his teeth, and his feet, could enable him to accomplish. That we may perceive how the profit of capital thus employed arises from supplant- ing labour, let us consider the effect of ca- pital vested in machinery, iruthat first em- ployment of man, the cultivation of the ground. The moment he places a portion of capital in the acquisition of a spade, one man must obviously, in the course of a day, be able, with his spade, to prepare as much land for receiving seed, as fifty could, by the use of their nails. Thus, this portion of capital supplants the necessity of the la- bour of forty-nine men. In the progress of things, a portion of the national capital OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 157 domes to be invested in a plough ; and one man, with his plough, will prepare as much land for the reception of seed as perhaps six could with their spades. Thus, that portion of capital invested in a plough, sup- plants the necessity either of the labour of five diggers, or of two hundred and ninetv- nine men reduced by absolute want of ca- pital to use their nails. Again, if we consider the employment of capital in the formation of machinery, in one of the operations the most familiar, " — that of makmg stockings ; the wires em- ployed in knitting, the first means of stock- ing-making, affords a simple instance of a portion of capital employed in executing labour beyond the reach of the power of man to accomplish ; as without such assist- ance, we could hardly suppose him capable of making a pair of stockings. But, in the further progress of this art, a part of the capi- tal of the country becomes vested in a stock- ing-loom ; * and the profit of the capital * It is contended in France, that the first stocking-loom was introduced by Jean Hmdrct, in the year 1^56, in his ma- 158 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH, SO employed, is derived from the stocking- loom's supplanting the labour of a number of knitters. That this is the source of the profit arising from the machine, appears clearly from the circumstance, that the wages x)£ those knitters whose labour it supplants, form, on the one hand, the mea- sure of the utmost possible extent the pro- prietor of the machine can charge ; and, on the other, the ground on which mankind judge of the utility of the invention. Supposing, for example, one man with a loom should be capable of making three pair of stockings a-day, and that it should require six knitters to perform the same work with equal elegance, in the same time ; it is obvious, that the proprietor of the loom might demand, for making his three pair of stockings, the wages of five " knitters, and that he would receive them ; nufactory at the Chatteau de Madrid, Bois de Bouloigne. The Frame-work Knitters Company, attributing the invention to William Lee ot St John's College, Cambridge, have adopted, as one of the supporters to their arms, a Master of Arts in his wown and cap. See Anderson's History of Commerce, and Encyclopedic, Article Bus. n OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 159 because the consumer, by dealing with him rather than the knitters, would save in the purchase of the stockings the wages of one knitter. But if, on the contrary, a stock- ing-loom was only capable of making one pair of stockings in three days, as, from the hypothesis that three pair of stockings could be finished by six knitters in one day, it follows, that one knitter would make a pair of stockings in two days ; the proprie- tor of the loom could not dispose of his stockings ; because he would be obliged to charge one day's wages more than was paid to the knitters ; and the machine, though it executed the stockings in the greatest per- fection, would be set aside as useless, mere- ly because incapable of supplanting any portion of labour. The small profit which the proprietors of machinery generally acquire, when com- pared with the wages of labour, which the machine supplants, may perhaps create a suspicion of the rectitude of this opinion. Some fire-engines, for instance, draw more water from a coal-pit in one day, than could IfiO OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. be conveyed on the shoulders of three hun- dred men, even assisted by the machinery of buckets ; and a fire-engine undoubtedly performs its labour at a much smaller ex- pence than the amount of the wages of those whose labour it thus supplants. This is, in truth, the case with all machinery. All machines must execute the labour that was antecedently performed, at a cheaper rate than it could be done by the hand of man ; otherwise they would inevitably share the fate of the supposed stocking- loom, which could manufacture only one pair of stockings in three days, and be laid aside as useless. The actual profit drawn for the use of any machine, when universally adopted, must be regulated on the same principle with the hire of a field, or the payment of an artist, or the price of any other commo- dity; that is, by the proportion betwixt the quantity of machines that can be easily procured, and the demand for them. But that the profit of stock employed in the machinery is paid out of a fund that would OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. l6l otherwise be destined to pay the wages of the labour it supplants, is evident ; be- cause, if the proprietors of all the capital so employed, would combine to charge a greater sum for the use of the machines than the wages of the labour supplanted, they would be instantly set aside, and the same portion of the revenue of the nation again employed in the payment of wages, that was so directed before the machines were invented. The case of a patent, or exclusive privi- lege of the use of a machine, usually grant- ed, as the law of England now permits, for fourteen years, to reward an ingenious in- vention, will tend further to illustrate this. If such a privilege is given for the in- vention of a machine, which performs, by the labour of one man, a quantity of work that used to take the labour of four; as the possession of the exclusive privilege pre- vents any competition in doing the work, but what proceeds from the labour of the four workmen, their wages, as long as the patent continues, must obviously form the I. l62 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. measure of the patentee's charge ; that is, to secure employment, he has only to charge a little less than the wages of the labour which the machine supplants. But when the patent expires, other machines of the same nature are brought into com- petition ; and then his charge must be re- gulated on the same principle as every other, according to the abundance of ma- chines, or, (what is the same thing,) ac- cording to the facility of procuring ma- chines in proportion to the demand for them. This alteration, however, in the rule of charging, does not prevent the pro- fit of the machine being received out of a fund of the same nature of that which it was paid from before the expirationo f the patent ; to wit, from a part of the revenue of the country, destined, antecedent to the invention of the machine, to pay the wages of the labour it supplants. * * The theory of the Author of the Wealth of Nations made him regard the profit of stock as derived from the labour of the productive manufacturer; yet there are passages in his work that strongly tend to confirm the opinion here maintain- ed, for example : '* Both in the coarse and in the fine wool- OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. l63 Though, in confirmation of this opinion, it is impossible to cite the theory of any learned author who has treated of political economy, it has, however, in its favour, what is perhaps fully better j it derives " len manufacture, the machinery employed was much more ** imperfect in those ancient than it is in the present times. " It has since received three very capital improvements, be- " sides, probably, many smaller ones, of which it may be dif- ** ficult to ascertain either the number or the importance. " The three capital improvements are, first, The exchange of " the rock and spindle for the spinning-wheel, which, with '' the same quantity of labour, will perform more than double " the quantity of work. Secondly, The use of several very '' ingenious machines, which facilitate and abridge, in a still " greater proportion, the winding of the worsted and woollen *' yarn, or the proper management of the warp and woof, be- *' fore they are put into the loom ; an operation which, pre- " vious to the invention of those machines, must have been " extremely tedious and troublesome. Thirdly, The employ- " jnent of the fulling-mill, for thickening the cloth, instead of " treading it in water. Neither wind nor water-mills of any *' kind were known in England so early as the beginning of the " sixteenth century, nor, so far as I know, in any other part " of Europe north of the Alps. They had been mtroduced *' into Italy some time before. " The consideration of these circumstances may, perhaps, in " some measure, explain to us why the real price both of the " coarse and of the fine manufacture, was so much higher in " those ancient than it is in the present times. It cose a great' " er quantity of labour to bring the goods to market.'* Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 310. 4to edit. See also p. 306. I64i OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. ample testimony of its truth from the con- duct of the unlettered manufacturers them- selves, as is sufficiently evinced by the riots that have taken place on the introduction of various pices of machinery, and particu- larly at the time the ingenious machines for carding and spinning were first set a-going. 2. Of the Method in which that Portion of Capital produces its Profit, which is em- ployed in procuring and conveying to the Manufacturer the raw Materials, in ad- vance of Wages ; or in conveying the ma- nufactured Commodity to the Market, and furnishing it to the Consumer; — that is, in the Home Trade, If it has been made evident, that the share of the capital of a country vested in machinery derives its profit from supplant- ing labour, a little consideration will make it equally clear, that the stock employed in procuring and conveying to the manu- facturer the raw materials in advance of OF THE SOURCES OP WEALTH. l65 wages, or in conveying the manufactured commodity to the market, and furnishing it to the consumers, derives the profit it produces from the same source. The term produces, is here purposely used ; because it will appear, on analysing the grounds on which the proprietors of this portion of na- tional capital become possessed of their pro- fit, that they are entitled to acquire a profit, besides that which their stock can be pro- perly said to produce. That we may possess a clear view of the manner in which this part of the national capital becomes entitled to its profit, let us suppose that all at once it was abstracted from any society, and that each consumer was obliged to perform himself the services he now derives from the capital which is employed in procuring and conveying to the manufacture the raw materials in ad- vance of wages, or in conveying the manu- factured commodity to the market, and fur- nishincr it to the consumer. It is impossible, consistent wdth brevity, accurately to trace all the steps a consumer. 166 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. would be obliged to pursue to acquire any commodity, if this part of the capital of a country was abstracted ; and, fortunately, it is only necessary to describe it generally, so as, by giving a view of the nature of the duty he would perform, to exhibit the me- thod in which capital thus employed ac- quires its profit. As the national capital at present stands appropriated, if a pair of stockings is want- ed, they may be had by the consumer at the shop of the hosier. But if the part of the national capital which is employed in conducting them into that situation, was ab- stracted from any society, the consumer would be obliged, in the first instance, to quit his usual occupation, and repair to the sheep-farmers, for the purpose of procuring a quantity of wool. Having bought and paid for the wool, he would be then under the necessity of conveying it to the carder and spinner, whose wages he must advance. He would next be obliged to go in quest of the thread, when spun, to convey it to be dyed, and to pay the wages of the dyer. OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. l6j Finally, he must undertake the task of con- veying the thread from the dyer to the stocking-maker, of paying him his wages, and of carrying the stockings home. On examining the task thus imposed on the consumer, it seems to consist in two different duties. 1. He is compelled, by abstracting this part of the national capital, to withdraw from his own stock the money with which he pays the wool, that with which he pays the carder and spinner, and that with which he pays the dyer, some time before he ac- quires the use of the stockings, which must create a loss of the profit he might derive by retaining this portion of capital in his own employ. 2. He is obliged to perform the labour requisite for selecting the wool, the labour of carrying it to be carded and spun, the labour of conveying it to the dyer, and lastly, that of taking it to the stocking- maker, and from thence home. Now, these two duties, that would be thus imposed on the consumer, by abstract- 168 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. ing the portion of capital employed in pro- curing and conveying to the manufacturer the raw materials in advance of wages, or in conveying the manufactured commodity to the market, and furnishing it to the con- sumer, give a just view of what is the source of the profit of capital so employed. 1. It seems entitled to a profit, on ac- count of the consumer's being saved the necessity of an advance for payment of the wool, &c. But this profit cannot properly be said to be produced by the capital so em- ployed ; the capital thus engaged in the home trade can only be considered as hav- ing a right to acquire it ; for this profit is evidently produced by the stock which is by this means allowed to remain in the hands of the consumer, and arises from the rent of land, if the consumer so employs his capital, — from agriculture, if he employs it in cultivating the land, — or from supplant- ing some other species of labour, if he em- ploys it as a stock in trade. 2. It is entitled to a profit, because it ex- empts the consumer from the second class OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. l69 of duties that have been enumerated. This profit it may be properly said to produce ; and this is obviously produced by supplant- ing that labour which he would otherwise be compelled to perform. Like the labour supplanted by stock vest- ed in a machine, the value of these duties combined, forms, on the one hand, the measure of the utmost possible extent the proprietor of this portion of capital can charge ; and, on the other, the ground on which mankind must judge of the utility of its being so employed. For example : let us suppose that the consumer has made of profit from the mo- ney which the existence of this capital enables him to retain in his own em- ploy, and which he would otherwise have been obliged to advance for the pur- chase of wool, &c. long before getting his stockings into his possession, the sum of sixpence ; and let us further suppose, that the consumer values the labour it saves him, at five shillings : the utmost pos- sible charge the proprietor of the capital 170 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. could make, over and above the payment of the wool, and wages of the spinner, dyer, and weaver, would be something un- der five shillings and sixpence ; for if it ex- ceeded this sum, the consumer would per- form the duties himself, and the capital al- lotted to be so employed would be regard- ed as useless. Again : though the charge might a- mount to five shillings and sixpence, as long as the competition in performing the duty remained solely betwixt the consumer of the stockings and one proprietor of stock, yet, as the price of performing the labour supplanted by a machine is at once settled on a different principle, when a number of machines come into competi- tion ; so when a number of different pro- prietors of stock present themselves for performing these duties, the actual charge is at once regulated in the same manner as the charge for the machine, when a num- ber of machines come into competition ; and, indeed, on tlie same principle as the price of all other things, it is determined OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. I7I by the quantity of stock contending for the performance of these duties in proportion to the demand for it. Finally, it must be remarked, that though the proprietor of capital so employed saves, by the use of it, the labour of the consumer, he by no means substitutes in its place an equal portion of his own ; which proves that it is his capital, and not himself, that performs it. He, by means of his capital, perhaps does the business of three hundred consumers by one journey; and carts, boats, and a variety of other machinery, all tend- ing to supplant labour, are applicable to the large scale in which he deals, from which a consumer could derive no benefit in procur- ing for himself the small quantity adapted to the satisfaction of his individual desires. 172 Of the sources of wealth. 4. Of the Method in which that Portion of Capital produces its Profit ^ which is em- ployed either in the Importation of the Commodities of another Country^ or the Exportation of Home Manufactures ; — that is, in Foreign Trade, On this subject it is fortunately unne- cessary to enter into so long a detail. The same reasoning we have used to shew that capital embarked in every branch of the home trade uniformly derives its profit from supplanting a certain portion of labour, is equally applicable to capital embarked in foreign trade. As the portion of labour sup- planted by this description of capital is much greater, if the competition existed solely betwixt a single proprietor of stock and the consumer, his charge might be much higher. Foreign trade is the exchange of the commodities of one distant part of the world for those of another, by which the desires of man are gratified with things OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. I7S which the habits of industry in another country enable the inhabitants to produce at a cheaper rate or of a better quah;y, or with things that he could not obtain from the soil around him, or in the climate in which he lives. As in every case of trade, whether fo- reign o r domestic, the consumer, if there existed no capital, must himself, in de- tail, pay for, or perform, every expence or portion of labour requisite to bring any commodity into his possession in the shape in which he desires it ; if the raw material grows at a distance from him, and many of the steps in the process of giving it form, are conducted at a distance from one ano- ther, the portion of labour which the use of capital supplants must be greater. But the profit of capital employed in foreign trade, though it arises from supplanting labour, comes to be regulated, not by the value of the labour it supplants, but, as in all other cases, by the competition among the pro- prietors of capital ; and it will be great or small in proportion to the quantity of capi- ly^i OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. tal that presents itself for performing the duty, and the demand for it. Foreign trade, it must also be remarked, in the shipping it employs, furnishes the great example of capital engaged in per- forming that species of labour which is be- yond the reach of the powers of man to accomplish ; for man, even with the small- est quantity of any commodity, is inca- pable of swimming from islands to the con- tinent ; — from the old to the new world, — and of performing those long voyages which the modern skill in navigation ena- bles the seaman to undertake. The duty, however, which capital thus performs, and by which it produces its pro- fit, is so obviously of the same nature, that it requires no explanation to shew that it consists in labour. * * The imagination of Voltaire has put into the mouth of the Philosopher, in the dialogue betwixt a Philosopher and ^ Comptroller of Finance, the following sentiment: — " Le com-' *' mercejait le meme effet que le travail des mains." OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 175 4. Of the Method in which that Portion of Capital produces its Projit which is em- ployed in Agriculture, I^ABOUR is the only means of improving the fertility of the earth. — " Cursed is the ground for thy sake. In " sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days " of thy life. Thorns also and thistles *' shall it bring forth to thee : and thou " shalt eat the herb of the field. In the " sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread." * And true it is, that, by the exertions of the labour of man alone, are food and ma- terials for clothing extracted from the earth in sufficient quantity to supply his wants. In shewino; that stock vested in machine- ry draws its profit solely from the circum- stance of supplanting labour, the effect of the spade and the plough, in which the husbandman vests part of his capital, has been already traced. It has been shewn, * Genesis, chap. iii. 176 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. that capital vested in those implements alone derives its profit from supplanting a portion of the labour that he would other- wise be obliged to perform ; and the same reasoning is applicable to explain how the whole of his capital, vested in horses, carts, or any other machinery, derives its profit from the same circumstance. " In a farm where all the necessary build- " ings, fences, drains, communications, &c. " are in the most perfect good order, the " same number of labourers and labouring «' cattle will raise a much greater produce, " than in one of equal extent and equally " good ground, but not furnished with «' equal conveniences." * — Thus — ^* An im~ " proved farm may very justly be regarded ^' in the same light as those useful ma- " chines which facilitate and abridge la- " hour." f Though the Author of the Wealth of Nations did not perceive that capital vested either in agriculture or in machinery derives its profit from supplant- * Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 343. 4to edit, f Ibid. Vol. I. p. 335. OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 177 ing labour ; yet it is evident from the pas- sage here quoted, that he felt the similarity of their effects ; and if, instead of regarding the effect of a machine as facilitating la- bour, or as increasing the productive powers of labour, * (as he expresses it,) he had per- ceived that capital vested in machinery ac- quires its profit by supplanting labour, he must have attributed the origin of the pro- fit he here describes to the same circum- stance. But, indeed, all capital vested in any de- partment of agriculture alike derives its profit from this source. If the farmer employs stock or capital in manuring, that is, in mixing of soils, to in- crease fertility, the benefit he derives from it obviously consists in supplanting labour he would otherwise be under the necessity of performing, to procure the same quanti- * It is a strange confusion of ideas that has led Dr Smith to describe the operation of capital as increasing the produc- tive powers of labour. The same process of reasoning would lead a man to describe the effect of shortening a circuitous road between any two given places, from ten miles to five miles, as doubling the velocity of the walker. M 178 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. ty of produce. If by such process he can double the fertihty of his field, the labour employed in the cultivation of one acre supplies the produce that would have been drawn from the labour bestowed on two ; and, by the fertility thus bestowed, sup- plants the necessity of one- half of the la- bour antecedently requisite. If he vests his capital either in seed of a particular quality, or in a stock of cattle and sheep of a peculiar fattening kind, he does this, that, with the same labour, he may grow more corn, or produce more beef or mutton. So truly does man's nou- rishment depend on the sweat of his face, that he can derive aid or assistance from nothing in increasing the fertility of the ground, but in proportion as it performs or supplants a part of the labour which he must otherwise of necessity submit to. OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 179 5. Of the Method in which that Portion of National Capital produces a Profit which is employed in conducting Circulation. In considering how that portion of the national capital employed in conducting circulation produces a profit, it is necessa- ry clearly to distinguish what forms circu- lating capital, from the goods that are cir- culated by means of capital ; and this be- comes the more so, because we are accus- tomed to see these two things, however different, almost uniformly confounded, by those who have treated on the subject. * In the manner in which the circulation * In the Wealth of Nations, the circulating capital of a country is stated to be composed of four parts. The first is de- scribed as consisting of the money, by means of which all the others are circulated and distributed; the author thus plainly confessing, that the other three articles of which he imagined circulating capital to be composed, are not employ- ed in circulating, but are actually goods to be circulated. They are, in fact, portions of what is reserved for consumption. Wealth of Nations, p. 326. ] 80 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. of most European countries is at present conducted, the circulating capital may be properly regarded as composed either of the coin, or of the substitutes for coin, which banking, and the modern facilities of conveying credit, have created. To these, therefore, we confine our views ; conceiv- ing them to form what may be, with strict propriety, denominated the circulating ca- pital of a country ; and a little examina- tion will suffice to show, that gold and sil- ver, as coin, are alone estimated by man for their utility in supplanting labour, as well as that the advantage which the pub- lic derives from the improved method of circulation, by means of banks, is founded on the same principle. Money is of use to mankind in two dif- ferent capacities ; as an instrument of ex- change ; and as a practical standard, by which the value of all commodities is mea- sured and expressed. To convey a clear idea how the portion of the national capi- tal employed in executing these two duties OF THE SOURCES OF ^VEALTH. 181 is profitable merely from the circumstance of its supplanting labour, perhaps no better method can be followed, than that which was pursued in examining the foundation of the profit of capital employed in the home trade. Let us then consider what would be the effect of withdrawing from any society that part of its capital which is employed in conducting the circulation of goods, and in forming a practical standard, by which the value of commodities is measured and expressed. The moment this portion of the national capital is abstracted from any society, the exchange of those things which nature or art enables one man to produce with great- er ease or of better quality, for those things which similar circumstances enable another to produce with greater advantage, must be conducted by barter. A farmer, for example, who had in his barn a quantity of wheat, much greater than the consumption of his family, and who de- 182 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. stined the overplus to supply the otlier ar- ticles necessary for their clothing and nou- rishment, if he wanted a pair of shoes, would be obliged to proceed with a quan- tity of his wheat to a shoemaker, to endea- vour to negotiate an exchange ; but as it might probably happen, that the first shoe- maker he accosted, had already, in return for shoes, obtained all the wheat he meant to consume, he would be compelled to re- main without shoes, till he could find a shoemaker who wanted wheat. If, unfortunately, the whole profession were already supplied with wheat ; to ob- tain a pair of shoes, he would be under the necessity of endeavouring to discover what was the article the shoemaker wished to procure ; and if, on inquiry, it appeared that beer was the commodity with which the shoemaker wished to be supplied, the farmer must then attempt to procure from the brewer a quantity of beer in exchange for his wheat, as a preliminary to his future negotiation with the shoemaker. OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 18S But the brewer might also be supplied with wheat ; which would oblige the farm- er, in the first instance, to exchange his wheat for some commodity the brewer wanted, that with it he might purchase tlue beer, with which he afterwards meant to acquire his shoes. Tedious as this process may appear, it is one of the simplest cases that could be stated, for the purpose of pointing out and explaining the laborious path which every man would be obliged to tread, in endea- vouring to supply his wants by parting with his superfluities in a country depriv- ed of all circulating capital ; for it is plain, that the course would often be infinitely more tedious and intricate, before the goods of one man could be repeatedly bar- tered, till they at length became exchanged for that particular commodity which ano- ther wanted. Neither is this the sole source of the la- bour that would be imposed on man, by withdrawing the capital employed in the 184 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. conduct of circulation. As there would then exist no general standard by which the value of commodities was usually esti- mated, an inquiry must of necessity take place, in settling the terms of every parti- cular exchange, to ascertain the relative value of the goods to be bartered. For example : if the brewer to whom the farmer applied, wished to have some wheat, and it so happened, that neither the farmer had antecedently exchanged wheat for beer, nor the brewer beer for wheat, they would be at a loss to fix the quantity of wheat that should be given for a gallon of beer. If, indeed, each had luckily already procured a leg of the same sheep in exchange for the commodity they respectively possessed, they might then discover the relative va- lue of the wheat and the beer, because two things, equal to one and the same thing, are equal to one another ; but as it would probably happen, that the farmer and brew- er had never exchanged wheat and beer for the same coijimodity, they could not OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH; 185 have recourse to this easy mode of decid- ing the portion of wheat that ought to be parted with for the acquisition of a given quantity of beer. The course, therefore, the farmer would have to pursue, even af- ter he had undergone the labour necessary to discover a brewer who wanted wheat, might be infinitely laborious, before he could trace out, through the medium of va- rious exchanges, some one interchange, that afforded a point of comparison be- twixt the value of the wheat and the beer. If this, however, could not be discovered, he would be obliged, as the only means of ascertaining the terms of the exchange, to institute an inquiry into the proportion be- twixt the demand for, and the quantity of, the beer, and also into the demand for, and quantity of, the wheat ; these being the cir- cumstances on which the relative value of all commodities depends. The beer being procured, it is plain, he might be under the necessity of repeating the same operation in negotiating the ex- change for the shots. 186 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. Thus, it is obvious, that the portion of the capital of a country employed in con- ducting circulation, is not only profitably employed, by saving the labour of man, in its character of an instrument for conduct- ing exchanges, but also in its capacity of a standard, for measuring the value of com- modities. It is not, perhaps, at first sight, so appa- rent, that circulating capital is profitable to mankind from the circumstance of sup- planting labour, as it is that the profit of a machine is derived from that source ; but there is in reality no part of the capital of a nation that supplants a greater portion of labour, certainly none the benefit of which in supplanting labour is more universally enjoyed. The labour of the manufacturer fixes and realizes itself in some vendible com- modity. Its existence as productive labour is therefore more easily discernible than the labour of the menial servant, whose ser- vices generally perish at the instant of per- OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 187 formance. The labour of a manufacturino: machine, in like manner, fixes itself in some vendible commodity, which makes the origin of its profit more apparent than that of circulating capital, whose services, like that of the menial servant, perish at the instant of their performance ; but which, like his, too, remain at all times prepared to supplant the necessity of ano- ther portion of labour, which the master must otherwise perform. * Though coin, employed as circulating capital, has been thus eagerly sought after, not for the sake of the gold and silver it * Neither the labour performed by the menial servant, nor that of which the necessity is supplanted by circulating capi- tal, do naturally stock, or store themselves up in such a man- ner as to be transferred from one to another for a defined va- lue. The profit of the one and the other alike arises from saving the labour of the owner or master. The similarity is indeed such, that it is natural to suppose the same circum- stances which led the one to be deemed unproductive, would naturally create the same impression with relation to the other. Accordingly, the Author of the Wealth of Nations, who conceives the labour of the menial servant to be unpro- ductive, informs us, that *' the gold and silver money which ** circulates in any country, and by means of which the pro- 188 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH* coutains, but merely on account of the la* bour it supplants ; like other means of sup- planting labour, it requires, though an in- ferior, yet a certain portion of labour to procure it. To carry it about, when pro- cured, is also, from its bulk and weight, laborious. To save these remaining por- tions of labour, in conducting the circula- tion of a country, various modifications of banks have been successively introduced, highly beneficial to the community in which they have been established, from their sup- planting the labour, formerly performed by the Sovereign, of procuring coin, and that performed by the subjects, of making payments in it ; * and also from their exe- cuting, with a machine of little value, the *' duce of its land and labour is annually circulated, and tlis- " tributed to the proper consumers, is, in the same manner ** as the ready money of the dealer, ail dead stock. It is a " very valuable part of the capital of the country, which pro- " duces nothing to the country." Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 388, 4to edit. • There are various passages in Mr Thornton's book on OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 189 labour antecedently performed by a very expensive Instrument. From this last circumstance it is, that most countries undoubtedly derive what has been esteemed the greatest benefit they enjoy from the modern improved method of conducting the circulation of commodi- ties. Yet it seems to be the desire of man to supplant labour that we are indebted for Paper Credit, which may be cited in confirmation of the pro- Position, that supplanting of labour is the great object in the introduction of all substitutes for coin.— For example : " To speak first of Bills of Exchange. — It is obvious, that '* however pi)rtable gold may be in comparison of any other " article which might be made a measure of value, to carry it '* in quantities to a great distance must prove incommodious. *' Let it be supposed that there are in London ten manutac- " turers, who sell their article to ten shopkeepers in York, by '* whom it is retailed ; and that there are in York ten manu- ** facturers of another commodity, who sell it to ten shop- *' keepers in London. There would be no occasion for the " ten shopkeepers in London to send yearly to York guineas '< for the payment of the York manufactures, and for the ten '< York shopkeepers to send yearly as many guineas to Lon- *< don." He then proceeds to show the u^e of bills of ex- change in supplanting labour. See p. 24. Again, p. 54. " But further, if bills and bank-notes were " extinguished, other substitutes than gold would u:iquestion- '* ably be found. Recourse would be had to devices of va- 190 OF THK SOURCES OF WEALTH. the invention ; for banks, we are told, were first introduced into Swedeland, * where the money being all of copper, it was high- ly inconvenient, by reason of its weight and bulk, to carry it about in such quanti- ties as was necessary to conduct exchan- ges. In truth, though a country may derive much benefit from having a cheaper medi- um of exchange, insomuch, that if there is a scarcity of capital, it will by this means have more or other uses ; yet this consi- *' rious kinds, by Avhich men would save themselves the trouble ^' of countings weighings and transporting guineas^ in all the *' larger operations of commerce." See also the description he gives, p. 55. of the inelhod in which London bankers make payments to one another, calculated for no other purpose but to supplant the necessity of a portion of labour which their clerks would otherwise be obliged to perform. * *' The use of banks has been the best method yet prac- " tised for the increase of money. Banks have been used in " Italy ; but, as I am informed, the invention of them was " owing to Swedeland. Their money was copper, which " was inconvenient by reason of its weight and bulk. To re- " medy this inconveniency, a bank was set up, where the " money might be pledged, and credit given to the value, which " passed in -payments." Law on Money and Trade. Glas- gow edit. p. 67, 11 OP THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 19l deration never could form the motive of any individual, for preferring one medium of exchange to another. To the seller of a commodity, the value of the medium of exchange is perfectly indifferent, provided he is sure it is in equal estimation with those from whom he subsequently means to purchase. A man can alone have an in- terest in the value of what he produces, and what he consumes : but coin or its substi- tutes are never consumed ; they only pass from one to another, for the purpose of saving labour in the conduct of exchange ; and the only immediate interest that he who accepts a given quantity of any medium of exchange can have, is, that it should save as much labour as possible. It is on this principle that silver is preferred to an equal value of copper ; that gold, in making large payments, is preferred to both ; and that bills of exchange supplant, with advantage, the use of the metals in extended commer- cial concerns. * * ** Bills of exchange are a most useful invention for con. *' \'Pying money witb ease and safety from one part of the 192 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. Had the ingenious Abbe Morellet writ- ten for the purpose of* illustrating what is here stated, he could not have given a more desirable definition of paper-currency than the following : " We understand by paper- " money, every acknowledgment of debt " or obligation ; in a word, every stipula- " tion, by writing, betwixt a debtor and " creditor, which obliges the former to " pay, and authorises the latter to exact a " value ; and which being capable of con- " veyance, becomes a means of transfer- " ring the property of these values from " one to another, without transporting the " things valuable in substance. " It is plain, that this definition applies " to all notes, bills, and every species of ^^ bank-credit ; to securities granted by go- " kingdom to another. In that light they may he said to re- " semble a waggon carrying goods along a turnpike road, or *' a boat on a canal. So that the imposing too high a stamp " duty on bills of exchange produces just the same effect on *' commerce, as the increase of tolls on a road, or of lockage " dues." Memoir of the Bankers in Scotland, respecting the proposed additional stamp duties on bills of exchange and promissi»ry notesj circulating as bank notes. 1801. 4 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH» 19S *"'* v^ernments for money borrowed, a8 well " as to all securities for money advanced in " speculations of commerce or finance : fi- " nally, to credit given by one individual to " another, in the form of bills of exchange, " promissory -notes, orders, &c. &c." * But it is not alone when employed in the useful and beneficial purposes of commerce, manufactures, agriculture, and the conduct of exchanges, that capital, serves man, by supplanting or performing labour. After the explanation given, without involving the reader in any additional detail, his own imagination will at once suggest how these immense capitals, squandered in the mo- dern conduct of mischievous, but perhaps unavoidable warfare, are alone profitable to the community, upon the same prin- ciple. From this short examination, it appears that capital, whether fixed or circulating, whether embarked in the home or in fo- reign trade, far from being employed in * Prospectus d'un Nouveaux Dictionnaire de Commerce, p. 84-, For the original see Appendix, No, III. N 104) OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. putting labour into motion, or in adding^ to the productive powers of labour, * is, on the contrary^ alone useful or profitable ta mankind, from the circumstance of its ei- ther supplanting the necessity of a portion of labour, that would otherwise be perfojrmed by the hand of man, or of its executing a portion of labour, beyond the reach of the powers of man to accomplish ; and this is not a mere criticism on words, but a distinction in it- self most important. The idea that capital puts labour into mo- tion, that it adds to the productive powers of labour gives rise to the opinion that la- bour (which, it will afterwards be shown, is the great means of increasing wealth) is every where proportioned to the quantity of existing capital ; f that the general in- dustry of a country is always proportioned to the capital that employs it ; % ^^^ there- fore authorizes the inference, that the in- • Wealth of Nations, Vol, I. p. 437, 441, 445. 4to edit., and in many other passages. f Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 3. 4to edit. See also p, 329. X Ibid. Vol. II. p. 37. OF THE SOURCES OP WEALTH. 195 crease of capital is the sovereign and un- bounded means of augmenting wealth. Whereas the opinion, that capital can alone be employed with utility and advantage in supplanting or performing labour, natu- rally suggests the inference, that a coun- try cannot be benefited by the posses- sion of a greater portion of capital than can be employed in performing and sup- planting labour, in the production and for- mation of those things for which there ex- ists a demand. Neither is this the only important er- ror into which the author of the Wealth of Nations has been led, by consider- ing capital as adding to the productive powers of labour. The impossibility of regarding capital employed in the con- duct of circulation ; for example, gui- neas, as adding to the productive powers of the labour of those who take them in ex- change, has led him to represent all circu- lating capital as totally unproductive of pro- fit, and as, in reality, an article of expence 196 OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. to the community. Though, from what has been said, it must appear certain that there is no mode in which capital can be employed, from which the community, in consequence of the great portion of labour it supplants, derives a greater profit. Having thus analyzed and explained the nature and origin of the profit on stock, having attempted to make manifest, that as land produces profit by means of its produce, and that as labour produces pro- fit by increasing the quantity, and melio- rating the quality of the productions of nature, and by giving it form adapted for consumption, so capital is productive of profit, either by supplanting a portion of la- bour which would otherwise be performed by the hand of man, or by performing a portion of labour which is beyond the reach of his powers to accomplish ; in pursuance of the plan adopted, we should be naturally led to investigate how iar the profit of stock, the nature of which has been explained, is to be ranked, along witk OF THE SOURCES OF WEALTH. 197 the produce of land, and the exertions of labour, as a source of wealth. But the investigation in which we have been engaged seems to preclude the neces- sity of entering into any detail on this sub- ject ; for if we have been successful in show- ing that labour, in all its varieties, is more or less productive of wealth, it follows, that capital^ the profit of which arises from per- forming, with great advantage to mankind, labour, which has already been proved to contribute towards wealth, must also be re- garded as a source of wealth. CHAP. IV. OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS OF INCREASING WEALTH. The sources of national wealth having been examined and ascertained, it would seem that we might proceed, without further in- vestigation, to consider the different effects of the produce of land ; of the exertions of labour and of capital, supplanting and performing labour, in increasing wealth ; these being the sole sources of wealth, and therefore the only means of increasing it. For, as animals are only multiplied by the means by which they are produced ; as ve- getable substances also can only be increas- ed by the means by which they are pro- duced, as a greater quantity of metals, and other productions from the bowels of the OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS, kc. 19^ earth, are to be acquired by no other means, but an increase of that labour which pro- cures them ; and as an increased quantity of raw materials can only acquire the form that adapts them for consumption, by a more frequent repetition, or skilful exer- tion, of the labour that gives them form ; so wealth, it might be reasonably inferred, could alone be increased by the means by which it is produced. But popular prejudice, which has ever regarded the sum-total of individual riches to be synonymous with public wealth, and which has conceived every means of in- creasing the riches of individuals, to be a means of increasing public wealth, has pointed out parsimony, or accumulation by a man's depriving himself of the objects of desire to which his income entitles him, (the usual means of increasing private for- tune,) as the most active means of augments ing public wealth. When we reflect that this abstinence from expenditure, and consequent accu- mulation, neither tends to increase the pro- fOO OF PAK SIMONY, AS A MEANS duce of land, to augment the exertions of labour, nor to perform a portion of labour that must otherwise be executed by the hand of man ; it seems that we might be entitled at once to pronounce, that accumu- lation may be a method of transferring wealth from one member of a community to another ; but that it cannot be a method of increasing public wealth, because wealth can alone be increased by the same means by which it is produced. But when the public prejudice is con- firmed by men most admired for talents ; when we are told by the most esteemed authority, that capital can only be aug- mented in proportion to what can be saved out of the revenue ; * that every prodigal is a public enemy, and every frugal man a public benefactor ; f that parsimony and not industry increases capital, (meaning wealth ; J) and that, as frugality increases, and prodigality diminishes, the public ca- * Wealth of NatiosT!, Vol II. p. 37. 4to edit. •t Ibid. Wi. I. p. 414. 4to edit. I Ibid, Vol, 1, p. 421. See also p. 446. OF INCREASING -VVEALTH. 201 pital, SO the conduct of those whose ex- pence just equals their revenue, neither in- creases nor diminishes it ; * it becomes ne- cessary to enter into a more minute exami- nation of this opinion : and the more so, as it has given birth to an erroneous system of legislation, which, if persisted in, must infallibly ruin the country that adopts or perseveres in it. The means by which stock or capital acquires profithave been already investigat- ed. It has been shown that it is uniformly profitable to man, by supplanting the ne- cessity of a portion of labour, he must other- wise perform, or by performing a portion of labour beyond the reach of his power ; and it does not require much consideration to discover what it is that executes this labour ; — it is obviously a part of the pro- duce of the earth, or a part of the earth it- self, to which either nature or art has * This (pinion concerning the salutary eft'ects of parsimony is held by inany other writers on political economy ; morr particularly by Turgot, in his treatise on the formation and ilistribution ot riches. See from paragraph 49 to 83. SOS OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS given a form that renders it fit to supplant labour. If capital, however, in all its variety, ig neither more nor less than a part of the produce of the earth, or a part of the earth itself, to which either nature or art has given a form that adapts it for supplanting or performing a portion of labour ; let us consider, whether a country can increase its wealth, by appropriating to this duty a portion of its labour, that ought naturally to be employed in the reproduction of con- sumable commodities, that is, in the forma- tion of revenue. For the sake of perspicuity, we shall begin by examining the effects of accu- mulation, in the most simple state of man's existence, where capital has not yet assum- ed all that variety of form, which man, in the progress of society gives it, for the pur- pose of performing labour ; though the same observations will afterwards appear applicable to societies, such as modern Europe presents to our view ; where capi- tal floats in all the variety of channels to OF INCREASING WEALTH. 203 which extended commerce destines it, and where even the natm'al channels, in which all property would fluctuate, are deranged by overgrown financial arrangements. When man exists in that state in which he is chiefly occupied in agriculture, or the cultivation of the land, and the wants of his family are supplied, independent of all commercial exchanges, by its own industry, his property can alone consist in the land he possesses, in the grain he annually pro- duces, and the breeding stock, whose pro- duce is reared for consumption ; and lastly, in the animals and utensils he employs to enable him to produce and consume his wealth with less labour, — that isj in a more satisfactory and comfortable manner to himself In such a state, his property, there- fore, divides itself into three different branches. 1. The land he cultivates. 2. The stock he reserves for immediate and remote consumption, under which is comprehended the produce of his farm, whether vegetable or animal. 204 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS 3. His capital, consisting of the animals or machines he employs to supplant labour in the cultivation of his farm, or in the con- venient consumption of its produce. That this last part of his wealth is very beneficial is undoubted ; it supplants a por- tion of labour, which must otherwise be executed with his hands, and may even execute a portion of labour beyond the reach of his personal exertions to accom- plish. If, therefore, he is not possessed of a sufficiency of those animals, instruments, and machines, which form his capital, it will be in the highest degree advantageous that he should augment the exertions of his in- dustry for the purpose of procuring them. But desirable as the augmentation of this description of his property may appear, in- crease of industry is the only means by which, in this, or any other stateof his existence, he can at once augment his ca- pital and his wealth. If, indeed, in this insulated state a man could be supposed to be actuated by a dis- position to parsimony, he might be in duced OF INCREASING WEALTH. 20^ to increase his capital, by allotting a por- tion of the labour he usually bestowed on rearing the quantity of live stock and grain his family were accustomed to consume, to the formation of those things which are useful in supplanting labour. By such a change in the direction of his industry, his capital would be undoubtedly augmented, but it is evident his wealth would not be proportionally increased ; for he would ne- cessarily possess a smaller share of that wealth his labour produced, for the enjoy- ment and consumption of his family, before his disposition to parsimony abstracted a portion of it from this salutary occupation, for the purpose of directing its efforts to the formation of capital. An arrangement of his labour, which devoted to the production of barley a quantity of labour antecedently bestowed on the cultivation of oats, could never be regarded as increasing his store of barley, and his wealth in similar proportions ; it could alone augment his supply of barley at the expence of diminishing Jiis stock of 200 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS oats. Additional exertions of industry, directed towards the production of barley, which occasioned no diminution of labour bestowed on the formation of the other objects of his desire, are evidently the sole means of at once proportionally increasing his barley and his wealth. In like manner, additional exertions of industry, that occa- sion no diminution of the labour usually employed in the production of consumable commodities, must be regarded as the sole means by which a man, so situated, can at once increase his capital and his wealth, in the same proportion. Further, to explain with accuracy the ef- fects of parsimony, it is necessary to ob- serve, that, when we compare a proposal for increasing the wealth of an individual, by abstracting a portion of the labour he employs in producing one consumable com- modity, and devoting it to the production of another ; with a proposal for abstracting a portion of the labour he employs in pro- ducing consumable commodities, and de- voting it to the formation of capital, — OF INCREASING WEALTH. ZQtf there appears evidently a most important distinction. If a portion of labour is withdrawn from the production of one consumable commo- dity, and applied to the formation of ano- ther, it cannot be regarded as materially affecting his opulence : it can only be con- sidered as altering the nature of the ar- ticles his family consumes and enjoys. The continuance of this arrangement would give stability to the production of these new articles of consumption, but no perse- verance in it could increase or diminish his wealth to a greater extent than might be occasioned by the difference in value betwixt the new and the old production. In the same manner, if his supply of in- struments and machines for performing and supplanting labour, (that is, his capi- tal,) is not sufficient, though he might in- crease his wealth, by abstracting a por- tion of his industry from the formation of consumable commodities, and applying it to augment his capital, to the extent of the difference, in point of utility, betwixt S08 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS the consumable commodities he would lose, and the capital he would acquire ; yet this is a practice he could not long continue, without producing a positive diminution of opulence. Capital is not a commodity that is con- sumed : it accumulates ; and the moment he acquires, from the application of an addi- tional portion of his industry to increase it, all the known means of supplanting la- bour, by persevering in withdrawing a por- tion of his labour from the production of consumable commodities, and applying it to the increase of capital, he must inevit- ably diminish his wealth, to the extent of the quantity of consumable commodities, the production of which is thus impeded. For, as he cannot desire a greater quan- tity of capital than can be used in sup- planting or performing labour, an addi- tional quantity capnot appear to him an object of desire ; and, therefore, cannot be considered as wealth. Thus, it appears, that parsimony, or the abstracting of a portion of labour from the OF INCREASING WEALTH. 209 production of consumable commodities, for the purpose of applying it to the formation of things useful to perform labour, may, if pushed beyond the bounds of discretion, be the means of materially diminishing the wealth of an individual, who, secluded from society, trusts to his own industry to ob- tain what his family consumes and en- joys ; and that, on the other hand, it can, in no instance, be regarded as a means of increasing, in like proportions, his wealth and his capital. If such, however, are the consequences of parsimony on the wealth of man, when considered as a solitary individual, it does not appear how it at once can become an unlimited means of increasing wealth, merely from the circumstance of his en- joying the degree of social communication, that implies the existence of exchanges. It is true, the effects of parsimony on the wealth of a society, even in its simplest form, are not at once so perceptible ; — they appear in a shape calculated to de- ceive : — the fortune acquired by the miser o 210 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS attracts immediate attention ; whilst thfe loss his conduct creates is diffused over the property of all those members of the soci* ety who are employed in producing the articles he would otherwise consume, in shares so minute as almost to escape ob- servation^ A society, however, like an individual, can alone, at once, increase its wealth and its capital, in similar proportions, by addi-* tional exertions of industry ; for parsimo- ny does not augment opulence ; it only changes the direction in which the labour of a community is exerted; and unless we adopt an opinion, which, in economical reasoning, seems long to have been un- consciously cherished, — that capital ex- clusively forms wealth, — we cannot conceal from ourselves, that, if a society, by parsi- mony, increases its opulence in capital, it inevitably must diminish its wealth in ar- ticles produced for consumption. Even in the simplest state of social in* tercourse, by the division of professions, and the infinite number of exchanges that OF INCREASING WEALTH. Sll take place in consequence of the varied distributions of property, it becomes a mat- ter of intricacy to trace the effects of par- simony : they are nevertheless discernible, and may be exhibited to view in a manner that will make it apparent, that parsimony must have the same effect on the opulence of a community, as it has on that of an in- dividual secluded from society. To produce a profit, it has been already shown, that all capital must of necessity be employed in supplanting or performing labour ; when, therefore, any member of the society, by parsimony, accumulates ca- pital, it must create an immediate demand for the labour of the blacksmith, of the carpenter, and of other mechanics, who are employed in giving to raw materials the form that adapts them for executing la- bour ; the proportion betwixt the demand for, and the quantity of, this sort of labour, must of course be altered in such a man- ner, as, by increasing its value, to encou- rage the augmentation of it. But, as the increase of value and conse- 212 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS quent encouragement given to that species of labour, is occasioned by a diminution of expenditure in things that would be im- mediately consumed, it must reduce their value by the portion of demand it abstracts from them, (as has been already shown,*) in a greater degree than it increases the value of that labour, or of those commodi- ties to the acquisition of which it is per- verted ; that is, it must produce a greater diminution of encouragement to the pro- viding of food, clothing, and those other articles which would have been consumed, had it not been for this avidity of accumu- lating capital, than it gives augmentation of encouragement to the forming of those things which tend to supplant labour. But farther, to show the effects of indulging in parsimony, — that baneful passion, which has been falsely denominated a virtue, — it is ne- cessary here to explain the singular effect which the demand it creates must, in so- ciety, produce on individual riches, and,^ * See p. 50. OF INCREASING WEALTH. 213 consequently, on the encouragement to the augmentation of wealtli. It has already been made evident, that a sudden de.nandfor any consumable com- modity, by increasing its value, encourages an augmented production, and tends, there- fore, to increase wealth, though its effect is always counteracted by the more import- ant diminution o Hheyalue of other com- modities, (from which the sudden rise of the value of any one commodity abstracts a portion of demand,) because the check given to production, by the abstraction of demand, has a more powerful effectin di- minishing wealth, than the encouragement arising from an extension of demand has in augmenting it. This was. illustrated by showing the effect which doubling the de- mand for sugar would have, where the means of satisfying that increased demand were to be found, by abstracting a part of the expenditure of the society in butchers- meat, wine, and mustard. * * See p. 82. S14 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS In considering that subject, it appeared, that, though the diminution of individual riches, in the articles of wine, mustard, and butchers -meat, would be great, this would, in some degree, though inadequately, be compensated by an increase in the value of sugar, and the consequent augmenta- tion of the riches of individuals in that ar- ticle. But if this abstraction of demand from the articles of butchers-meat, wine, and mustard, had been occasioned by the desire of an individual to indulge in parsimony, then, as the quantity of those articles which compose the capital of the community would be increased, without any alteration in the extent of the demand for them, their value must be diminished, as well as that of the butchers-meat, wine, and mus- tard, from whence the demand is abstract- ed. Thus a diminution of value must be produced, not only in the articles for which parsimony occasions an abstraction of demand, but even in the articles for which it creates a demand ; and public OF INCREASING WEALTH. 215 wealth must severely feel the effects of the discouragement bv this means given to the production of both. Though it appears, therefore, that the wealth of a society never can be increased by a system of continued parsimony, this abstinence from expenditure in consum- able commodities, and consequent accumu- lation, may evidently be highly injurious to its progress ; for a community may suf- fer, Ist^ By the creation of a quantity of capital more than is requisite ; ^dli/, A community must at all times suffer by the abstraction of a portion of encouragement to future reproduction. 1. Bi/ the creation of a quantity of capi- ial more than is requisite ; for the moment a thing, however much esteemed, is produ- ced in such a quantity, that the whole can- not be employed, — -a part ceases to be an object of desire ; and as things, when no longer scarce, can form no part of indi- vidual riches, so, when no longer objects of desire, they form neither a portion of individual riches nor of wealth. The finest y S16 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS palaces in the world stand empty at Delhi, unoccupied and undesired ; and the spa- cious warehouses at Antwerp serve only as monuments of her departed commerce. 2. By the abstraction of a portion of ew- couragement to future reproduction^ a dimi- nution must be occasioned in the wealth to be produced ; for, as long as the nature of men remains unchanged, the knowledge of what has been consumed, and of the de- gree of avidity displayed in the market for the different articles of consumption, must imperiously regulate the nature of what is subsequently produced. This, indeed, may be assumed as a proposition universally ad- mitted ; in as much as even those who hold deprivation of expenditure, and conse- quent accumulation, to be a mode of in- creasing wealth, anxiously contend that the whole quantity of industry annually employed to bring any commodity to mar- ket, suits itself to the effectual demand. * An admission which not only renders it * Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 70. 4to edit. OF INCREASING WEALTH. 217 impracticable to consider parsimony as a means of increasing wealth, but which pre- cludes the possibility of denying that it must produce a rapid diminution of it. For, if the abstraction from expenditure of a sum equal to what is added to the ca- pital of the community, causes a diminu- tion of production to that extent ; parsi- mony must be considered as a means of creating capital, at the expence of sacri- ficing a revenue as great as the capital created ; and it does not appear, that a more ruinous operation in all its bearings can be devised, than that of disposing of an annual income, (for example, of a mil- lion,) for the purpose of acquiring a capi- tal to the same amount. If, indeed, the mercantile system of po- litical economy has justly been deemed objectionable, and is now universally ex- ploded, because it exclusively regarded money as wealth, the system that holds parsimony to be the great means of in- creasing wealth, seems equally objection- able, because it exclusively considers capi- S18 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS tal as wealth. The former system could alone be maintained by its followers teach- ing mankind, in estimating the benefit de- rived from trade, to overlook, as a matter of indifference, the goods sacrificed to ob- tain money ; whilst the latter can alone be maintained by its adherents habituating mankind to «how a similar indifference for revenue, by disregarding that diminution in the production of consumable commo- dities, which parsimony must inevitably create. If, however, deprivation of expenditure, and consequent accumulation, far from be- ing the means of increasing the wealth of a. solitary individual, inevitably leads to its diminution ; — if it appears that social in- tercourse, though it increases the difficulty of tracing the consequences of parsimony, produces no variation in its effects ; it seems impossible to discover what alteration the circumstances of a society can undergo, in the progress of wealth, which will so far change the nature of things as to transform OF INCREASING WEALTH. 219 parsimony into a means of increasing opu- lence. It has been observed, that the property man possesses, when existing in the situa- tion to which alhision has been made, na- turally classes itself under three different heads. Isff The land he cultivates. 2dli/f The stock he reserves for immedi- ate and remote consumption ; under which is comprehended the produce of his farm, whether vegetable or animal. 3dli/, His capital, consisting of the ani- mals and machines he employs to supplant labour in the cultivation of his farm, or in the convenient consumption of its produce. In the progress of wealth, the first ar- ticle of the society's property, the land the farmer cultivates becomes, from im- provement, more productive ; the improv- ed system of cultivation requires more ca- pital : and the demand thus created, like the demand for consumable commodities, encourages additional exertions of industry, which is the sole method of at once in- 220 OF PARSIMOXy, AS A MEANS creasing capital and wealth. Indeed, the most beneficial results often flow from the exertions of that labour which is rendered unnecessary by capital employed in exe- cuting newly invented means of supplanting labour. — " When I erected my thrashing- " machine, I found myself soon repaid from " the labour performed in cultivating the " farm by those men I was accustomed to " employ in thrashing ; and the expence " of making it go by wind instead of horses, *' was more than repaid by the additional " work my horses performed, the same " season the improvement was adopted." These are sentiments familiar to every man conversant in agricultural pursuits j and they are descriptive of the means by which the capital of an individual and the wealth of a society are at once increased, whilst parsimony, which depresses the de- mand for the produce of land, must dis- courage Its cultivation, and, of course, di- minish the demand for capital so employ- ed. The increased produce of land, occasion- OF INCREASING WEALTH. 221 ed by the wise application of labour and capital, of course, increases, in a great de- gree, the vegetable and animal substances reserved for immediate or remote con- sumption, which forms the second branch of the property of a society ; and it is this branch of the property of mankind that alone appears capable of unlimited in- crease; the more man augments it, the more must the human species abound in opu- lence or in numbers. The affluent mem- ber of an opulent society consumes more by reducing his nourishment into aform suit- able to his palate, by selecting, to compose his clothing, the parts of the productions of naturemost kindly tohis feeling, and pleasing to his eye ; and by disposing of a part of what is produced in exchange for commodities of a distant country, which affluence en- ables him, and habit teaches him to en- joy. If, even by all these various methods, the increased produce is not consumed, ex- perience shows that abundance of the ne- cessaries of life has a direct tendency to augment population, and, by this means. ^^*2 OF PARSIMONV, AS A MEANS to restore the proportion betwixt the de- mand for, and the quantity of, the increas- ed commodities ; thus maintaining their value, notwithstanding their abundance, and perpetuating the encouragement to re- production. * The third class or description of the pro- perty of a society, its capital, consisting of all the various means of supplanting la- bour, and of performing labour, which could not be accomplished by the personal • To some confused idea of the important truth that this branch of the property of mankind may be increased to an un- limited extent, creating, as it augments, a demand for a fur- ther increase of capital, which is here considered as a distinct description of wealth, maybe attributed the following remark- able passage in the work of an intelligent author, who wrote on trade, in the end of the 17th century: " This showeth a *' mistake of Mr Munn, in his Discourse of Trade, who com- ** mends parsimony, frugality, and sumptuary laws, as the " means to make a nation rich, and uses an argument from a "simile, supposing a man to have L. 1 000 per annum, and *' L. 2000 in a chest, and spends yearly L. 1500 per annum, " he will, in four years time, waste his L. 2000. This is true *' of a person, but not of a nation, because his estate is finite, *' but the stock of a nation is infinite, and can never be consura- " ed ; for what is infinite can neither receive addition by par- ** simony, nor suffer diminution by prodigality."— A Discourse of Trade, by H. Bifield, M. D. printed 1^90. OF INCREASING WEALTH. 2^3 exertions of man, may also, in the pro- gress of wealth and knowledge, be wonder- fully increased, as the shipping, the navi- gable canals, the roads, the machines for transporting and for fabricating, and the warehouses for preserving commodities, as well as the capital employed in circulating them, sufficiently denote. * * Nothing can more forcibly exhibit the great augmentation that has taken place during the last century in the capital, which, in this cf-jntry, is employed in conducting circulation, ' in consequence of its increased opulence, than the following advertisement inserted in the Post Boy of the 20th of March 17O8, and repeated in the same paper, March 23, 25, and 27: " London, March 20 — Whereas there have been several false " and malicious reports industriously spread abroad, reflecting " on Sir Richard lioare, goldsmith, for occasioning and promote *' ing a run for money on the Bank of England ; and in parti- " cular, several of the Directors of the said Bank, reporting, *' that the said Sii Richard sent to the Bank for ten of their notes *' of 1^.10 each, with a design to send several persons with the *' said notes to receive the money therein, so as to effect his ill de- " signs, and to bring disreputation on the Bank, and occasion 9, *' disturbance in the city of London. This is to satisfy all per- " sons, that the Right Honourable the Lord Ashburnham, father *' of the Honourable Major Ashburnham, major of the first troop «*of her Majesty's Life Guards, who was ordered to march for *' Scotland, sending to the said Sir Richard Hoare for a large ** quantity of gold, and for ten Bank notes of L. 10 each, for " the said major to take with him to bear his expences j the 224 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS But public wealth can alone be increas* ed by an augmentation of this or any other description of property, when ft proceeds from additional exertions of industry ; and capital must at all times have its limits, be- yond which, even by these means, it can- not be increased with advantage. In every state of society, a certain quantity of capi- tal, proportioned to the existing state of the knowledge of mankind, may be use- fully and profitably employed in supplant- ing and performing labour in the course of rearing, giving form to, and circulating the " gold was sent to his Lordship accordingly, and Sir Richard's '* servant went to the Bank for ten notes of L. 10 each, which " the cashier of the Bank refused to give. But if Sir Richard. " had intended to promote a run for money on the Bank, he " could have done it in a more effectual manner, having by " him, all the time that the great demand for money was on " the Bank, several thousand pounds in notes payable by the *' Bank; and also, there was brought to Sir Richard, by seve- " ral gentlemen, in the time ot the run on the Bank, notes pay- *' able by the said Bank, amounting to a great many thou- " sands of pounds, which he was desired to take, and receive *• the money presently from the Bank ; which he refused to do «* till the great demand on the Bank for money was over. " N. B. That the reports against Sir Richard have been " more malicious than herein is mentioned, which he forbears " to insert for brevity's sake." OF INCREASING WEALTH. 225 raw materials produced. Man's invention, in the means of supplanting labour, may give scope, in the progress of society, for the employment of an increased quantity ; but there must be, at all times, a point de- termined by the existing state of knowledge in the art of supplanting and performing labour with capital, beyond which capital cannot profitably be increased, and beyond which it will not naturally increase ; be- cause the quantity, when it exceeds that point, must increase in proportion to the de- mand for it, and its value, like that of all other commodities, must of consequence diminish in such a manner, as effectually to check its augmentation. It is wonderful how the author of the Wealth of Nations, who successfully ridicules tlie indefinite ac- cumulation of circulating capital, by com- paring it to the amassing of an unlimited number of pots and pans, * did not perceive that the same ridicule is applicable to the unlimited increase of every branch of that * Wealth of Nations, Vol. II. p. 15. 4to edit. P 226 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS deicription of the property of a country which constitutes its capital. Fortunately, however, for mankind, the mechanism of society is so arranged, that the mischief done by the parsimony and dis- position to accumulation of one indivi- dual is almost uniformly counteracted by the prodigality of some other ; so that, in practice, nothing is found more nearly commensurate than the expenditure and revenue of every society. This inquiry, therefore, if mankind were left to regulate their conduct bv their inclinations, would be rather a matter of curiosity than utili- ty ; for, if the effects of parsimony are uniformly counteracted by prodigality, the public wealth can be neither increased nor diminished by it. As an object of curiosity, it would, at all events, be interesting to investigate, whe- ther parsimony was entitled to all the prais- es lavished upon it by the learned and the ingenious. But theimpressiontheseopinions have, in our own times, made on the con- duct of legislation, has given to this inves- OF INCREASING WEALTH. 227 tigation a degree of importance whicli makes it highly interesting. Statesmen and legislators, (who, like others, have considered every means of in- creasing the fortunes of individuals as a means of increasing public wealth,) taught to admire the effect of parsimony and ac- cumulation in the conduct of private for- tunes, have been naturally led to regard it as a salutary means of increasing the public fortune, or relieving from embarrassment the public treasury. * On this principle, the republic of Hol- land, so early as the year 1655, was indu- ced to set aside an annual revenue, to be • *' On the same principle that guided the determination " of the Parliament of 1 786, another act was passed in 1792, *' which provided, that on all future loans, (in addition to the " taxes to be imposed for paying tlie interest of the same,) a " surplus of one pound per cent, per annum, on the capital *" created, should be raised for the redemption of that capital. *' This VMS an idea conceived in that tpirit of injlexible inte- " gnV^ and economi/^ ofxKihich nations rarely afford an exam- " pie ; though^ like the same virtue in private life, it is culcu- " lated to promote^ in the highest degree, their credit and their *^ prosperity J"* Brief Examination into the Increase of the Revenue, Commerce, &c. of Great Britain, by George Rose, p. 19. 228 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEAN8 permanently accumulated, for the public benefit. This example was, in the year 1685, followed by Pope Innocent XL ; and an arrangement of a similar nature took place in the management of the Trea- sury of England in the year 1717, which was afterv*rards extended in the year 1727, when an annual sum of no less than L. 1 ,200,000 was devoted to accumulation at compound interest. All these different sums, however, set aside for accumulation, (or sinking funds as they are called ;) — that of the province of Holland in the year 1 655, — that of Pope Innocent XI. in the year 1685, — as well as that established in England in the year 1717 and 1727, — arose from savings in consequence of reductions of interest ; for mankind had not yet become so enamoured of the idea of accumulation, as to em- bolden any legislature to impose burdens on the public for the avowed purpose. How and why this first attempt to force accumulation by law in England died away, will be afterwards considered. In point of OF INCREASING WEALTH. 229 fact, we are told, by one of the ablest and most respectable advocates in flivour of this fiyslem of increasing the wealth of a nation by accumulation, that, soon after the year 1730, this fund set aside for accumulation, which, if it ^' could have escaped the hand of " violence, would have made Great Britain " the envy and terror of the world, was pre- ** maturely destroyed by the hand of its own *' parent ;'* * and after that period, though there existed the name of a sinking fund, and though sums were from time to time employed to purchase up portions of the pubhc debt, the plan of a regular forced ac- cumulation, by the authority of Govern- ment, with a view to public benefit, was, for many years, relinquished in practice, f This system was, however, again revived in the year 1786, when, in the House of Commons, it was stated,— and certainly at ^he time truly stated, — to be the common consent of all, that L, 1,000,000 should • See an Appeal to the Public on the subject of the Na- tional Debt, by Dr Price, p. 37. t Sums paid off by the Sinking Fund established in 230 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS be set aside to accumulate for national be- nefit. A law was accordingly soon afterwards made, by which L. 1,000,000 was devoted to be accumulated quarterly, till such time as, together with the annuities which were to fall into the public, it amounted to 1717 and 1727, and afterwards augmented, by the reduc- tion of interest, betwixt the year 1750 and the year 1757« Year. Year. 1723, L. 1,204,786 3 4| 1738, L . 1 ,U00,000 1724, 333,447 18 4 1751, 368,771 2 4 1727, 6.^0,453 2 H 1752, 821,270 13 9 1728, 1 ,000,000 1765, 870,888 5 5| 17 -'9, 1,27.5,027 17 101 1766, 870,888 5 H 1730, 1 ,000,000 1767, 2,^>1 6,776 10 11 1731, 1,0.;0,419 16 4 1768, 1,750,000 1732, 1 ,000,000 1769, 875,000 1733, 913,1 15 15 H 1770, 1,500,000 1734, 86,884 4 H 1772, 1,500,000 1736, 1,000,000 1774, 1,000,000 1737, 1,000,000 1775, 1,000,000 Andount of the National Debt at diflferent Periods up to the Year 1775. Year. Year. 1688, L. 664.263 1748, L. 78,293,312 1702, 16,394,702 1735, 74,571,840 1715, 54,143,363 1762, 146,682,844. 1727, 52,092 235 1775, 135,943,051 1739, 46,934,623 OF INCREASING WEALTH. t3\ L. 4,000,000 7;cr annum. * And in the year 1792, after al)lj stating the prosperity which tlie duration of peace and tranquil- lity had secured for this country, the same minister, who proposed the accumulating fund in 1786, introduced a proposal for in- creasing the sum devoted to accumulation in the following terms : — *^ Having stated the increase of revenue, '^ and shown that it has been accompanied <' by a proportionate increase of the nation- ^' al wealth, commerce, and manufactures, " I feel that it is natural to ask, What have " been the peculiar circumstances to which ^* these effects are to be ascribed ? " The first, and most obvious answer, " which every man's mind will suggest to " this question, is, that it arises from the na- " tural industry and energy of the country ; *« but what is it which has enabled that in« " dustry and energy to act with such pecu- ^' liar vigour, and so far beyond the ex- " ample of former periods ? The improve- * Cap. xxxi, an. 26. Geo. III. 232 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS tf* ment which has been made in the mode " of carrying on ahuost every branch of " manufacture, and the degree to which la- " hour has been abridged, by the invention " and application of machinery, have un- " doubtedly had a considerable share in " producing such important effects. We " have besides seen, during these periods, *• more than at any former time, the effect *' of one circumstance which has princi- pally tended to raise this country to its " mercantile pre-eminence ; — I mean that " peculiar degree of credit, which, by a " twofold operation, at once gives addi- " tional facility and extent to the transac- " tions of our merchants at home, and en- " ables them to obtain a proportional supe- " riority in markets abroad. This advan- " tage has been most conspicuous during " the latter part of the period to which I *' have referred, and it is constantly in- " creasing, in proportion to the prosperity " which it contributes to create. " In addition to all this, the exploring " and enterprising spirit of our merchants OF INCREASING WEALTH. 233 " has been seen in the extension of our " navigation and our fisheries, and the ac- ** quisitions of new markets in different '' parts of the world j and, undoubtedly, " those efforts have been not a little assist- " ed by the additional intercourse with " France, in consequence of the Commer- " cial Treaty ; an intercourse which, though " probably checked and abated by the dis- " tractions now prevailing in that kingdom, " has furnished a great additional incite- " ment to industry and exertion. " But there is still another cause, even ** more satisfactory than these, because it " is of a still more extensive and perma- " nent nature ; that constant accumulation " of capital ; — that continual tendency to " increase, the operation of which is uni- " versally seen in a greater or less propor- " tion, wherever it is not obstructed by " some public calamity, or by some mis- " taken and mischievous policy ; but which " must be conspicuous and rapid,indee d,in " any country which has once arrived at an ** advanced state of commercial prosperity. S34 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS " Simple and obvious as this principle is, " and felt and observed as it must have *• been in a greater or less degree, even '^ from the earliest periods, I doubt vvhe- " ther it has ever been fully developed and " sufficiently explained, but in the writings " of an author of our own times, now un- <^ fortunately no more, (I mean the author " of the celebrated Treatise on the Wealth " of Nations,) whose extensive knowledge " of detail, and depth of philosophical re- " search, will, I believe, furnish the best *^ solution to every question connected with " the history of commerce, or with the " systeni of political economy. This accu- " mulation of capital arises from the conti- " nual appHcation of a part, at least, of the " profit obtained in each year, to increase " the total amount of capital to be employ- " ed in a similar manner, and with con- «* tinued profit, in the year following. The " great mass of the property of the nation *' is thus constancy increasiag at com- " pound interest ; the progress of which, *f in any considerable period, is what, OF INCREASING WEALTH. 235 *< at first view, would appear incredible. " Great as have been the effects of this " cause already, they must be greater in " future ; for its powers are augmented *' in proportion as they are exerted. It " acts with a velocity continually acce- " lerated, with a force continually increas- « ed. " Mobilitate viget, viresque acquirit eundo." * This was the prelude to a legislative ar- rangement, which devoted the annual mil- lion to be accumulated till it produced L. 3,000,000 per annum over and above the yearly million, and the produce of the annuities which would fall into the public ; and also to a provision, compelling one per cent, to be set aside annually for accumula- tion on the capital of all debt which should in future be contracted. L. 400,000 additional was likewise given * See Mr Pitt's Speech, printed by authority, for G. G. and J. Robinsons, 1792, p. 3^. 236 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS to the accumulating fund this year, which laid the foundation of another annual grant of L. 200,000. But the effects of this admiration of the benefits derived from a system of accumu- lation did not terminate here. The same minister, in the year 1 799, imposed an in- come tax, which he calculated would pro- duce L. 10,000,000 annually ;* and an act was passed, appropriating the produce of this tax on the return of peace to accumu- lation till it should amount to a sum suffi- cient to redeem the debt subsequently to be contracted during the war. The accumulating fund created in the year 1786, together with the addition de- rived from the arrangement made in the year 1792, by this time amounted annually to a sum such as enabled the public to fore- see, that, before the probable return of * See Appendix, No. IV. being the Computation of Income by Mr Pitt, as stated by Lord Auckland, in his Speech, print- ed by authority, 1799' And also by Mr Rose, Appendix, No. 7. of his Brief Examination. OF INCREASING WEALTH. 237 peace, it would produce L. 5,000,000 an- nually. Under the law of this country, therefore, as it was then constituted, had this income tax produced L. 10,000,000, L. 15,000,000 of the revenue of the country would, on the retiu'n of peace, have been devoted to accumulation. This statement will not, in substance, be contradicted either by Mr Pitt * or his ad- mirers, f He took credit to himself for * See Resolution on the Slate of Finance, 19th and 20th, proposed by Mr Pitt, and agreed to by the House of Com- mons, 1801. ■f *' But the farther resulting advantages are infinitely *' more important. It is not amongst the least of those ad- " vantages, that, by the present plan, the salutary effects of the *' sinking fund are greatly accelerated. The sums of different ^' descriptions to be reserved and applied by the cpmmission- •' ers for the redemption of the national debt, will, in the first *' year of peace, be not less than fifteen millions., or nearly ** £. 50,000 a dai/y for three hundred days in the year. The *' operation of such a sum brought daily into the market to ** purchase stock, which is to be extinguished, and not to re- *• turn to, cannot fail to have an effect in favour of our pub- *' lie credit, as much beyond all calculation as it will be be- '* yond all experience." See the Substance of Lord Auck- Jand's Speech, printed by authority, p. 22. 238 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS the device : and they uniformly asserted, that the merits of the plan, which they stat- ed to be of more importance to Great Britain than the possession of all the mines of America, would hand down his name with glory to posterity. * — This, too, was * See Chalmers's Estimate of the Comparative Strength of Great Britain, page 183. To which, however, it is impossi- ble to refer without remarliing, that it appears extraordinary the author should conclude, with the following .paragraph, the same chapter in which he states the Sinking Fund, as constituted by Mr Pitt, to be a measure of more importance to Great Britain than the acquisition of the American mines: — " The alterations which have been made in the collections " of some departments of the public income, and the improve- '* ment which has happily been effected in all, have biought, " and continue to bring, vast sums into the exchequer. The ** public expenditure continually distributes this vast revenue " among the creditors, or servants of the state, who return it " to the original contributors, either for the necessaries or ", luxuries of life. The exchequer, which thus constantly re- " ceives and disperses this immense income, has been aptly " compared to the human heart, that unceasingly carries on " the vital circulation ; so inviiroratin : while it flows ; so fatal " when it stops. Thus it is that modern taxes, which are never " hoarded but alwaj/s expended^ may even promote the em- " ployments and industry, the prosperity and populousness, of " an industrious people." OF INCREASING WEALTH. 239 the object of those daring projectors of the Tower of Babel, who are recorded in sacred history to have said, *' Go to, *' let us build us a tower whose top may " reach unto heaven, and let us make us a " name." And striking as the similarity may be in the object, there will be found a still more glaring resemblance in the de- sign. Had an opportunity existed, in profound peace, of applying this sum of L. 15,000,000 but for two years, to the uses to which by law it was appropriated, the ruin it must have produced would have practically ex- hibited and explained the folly of the at- tempt. But as we have had no oppor- tunity of learning from experience the consequences of the measure, it will re- quire a little investigation to display them. Before, however, proceeding to this in- quiry, lest the reader should be disposed to think, with the generality of mankind, that what is true in figures, and the result of accurate calculation, must be true in 54?l) of parsimony, as a means practice, and possible in execution ; he is desired to reflect, that one penny put out, at our Saviour's birth, at 5 per cent, com- pound interest, would, before this time, have increased to a greater sum than could be contained in five hundred millions of earths, all of solid gold ; and that this is a calculation as accurate, and as true, as any with which Parliament has been furnished in the progress of this delusion. * If L. 15,000,000 a~year were levied bv * *f Ojie penny put out at our Saviour's birth, to 5 per " cent, compound interest, would, in the present year, 1781, " have increased to a greater sum than would be contained in *' two hundred millions of earths, all solid gold. But if put " out to simple interest, it would, in the same time, have "amounted to no more than 7s. 6'd. AH Governments that •' alienate funds destined for reimbursements, choose to im- «' prove money in the last rather than in the first of these *' ways.'* Observations on Reversionary Payments, &c. by Richard Price, D. D. p. 228. That the reader may see a lively picture of the absurd length to which the speculations of incrjjasing the wealth of mankind, by accumulation of capital, have been carried, we have iu Appendix, No. V. printed the testament of Mr For- tune Ricard, teacher of arithmetic at D , read and pub- lished at the Court of Bailiwick of that iown, the 19 th Au- gust 1794, translated by Dr Price. OP INCREASING WEALTH. g^l the Government from the revenue of its subjects, to defray the charge of warfare or any other extraordinary expenditure ; as this money would be expended in articles of consumption, as fast as assumed, the expence of the Government would effec- tually counteract the effects of the parsi- mony it renders necessary, and creates in the subject. The only mischief, therefore, that could ensue, would arise from the ex- tensive demand it must suddenly occasion for one class of commodities, and from the consequent abstraction of so large a por- tion of the revenue of the subjects from the acquisition of those articles in which it is usually expended ; — a mischief in itself nowise trifling, as recent experience has taught the merchants of this country. * Very different, however, must have been the effect of raising fifteen millions for the purpose of accumulation, or of forcibly converting fifteen millions of reyenue into capital. In this, as in the former case, there would have ensued all the mischief * See p. 85. a 242 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS occasioned by abstracting a portion of de- mand represented by fifteen millions a- year, from the commodities which the sub- jects were accustomed to acquire with this part of their revenue ; but, in this case, there would unfortunately have existed no extraordinary expenditure, to counteract the full effects of this forced parsimony ; for it would have been difficult to persuade the proprietors of stock, from whom such extensive purchases would have been made by the Commissioners of the Sinking Fund, all at once to spend, as revenue, that which habit had taught them to regard as capital ; or, in other words, all at once to ruin them- selves, in order to counteract the bad ef- fects of this miserly policy in Govern- ment. Unless, however, the stockholder could have been persuaded thus to squander his capital, fifteen millions a-year less must have been expended in the different ar- ticles of consumption the country produ- ced or manufactured ; that is, a portion of demand would at once have been with- OF INCREASING WEALTH. €48 drawn from consumable commodities of British growth or manufacture, or, what is the same thing, from consumable commo- dities purchased by things of British growth and manufacture, nearly equal to the whole demand created by the foreign trade of the country in the year 1786, when the million was first set aside to accumulate, as the exports from England amounted in that year to the sum of L. 15,385,987. But if is true, (which all writers on poli- tical economy, however much they may differ on other subjects, concur in assert- ing, *) that the whole quantity of industry * " Que la totalite des sommes du revenu rentre dans la '* circulation annuellf, et la parcoure dans toute son etendue ; *' qu'il ne se forme ponit de lortunes pecuniares, ou du moins " qu'il y ait compensation entre ct-Ues qui se forment et celles <* qui reviennent dans la circulation ; car autrement ces fortunes ** pecuniaircsarreteroient la distribution d'une partie du revenu *' annuel de la nation, et retiendroient le pecule du Royaume " au prejudice de la rentree des avances de la culture, de la " retribution du salaire des artisans, et de la consommation ** que doivent faire les differentes classes d'hommes qui exer- <* cent des professions lucratives: Cette interception du pe- ** cule diniinueroit la reproduction des revenus,'* — " It is ne- ** cessary that the surc-total of the revenue should enter in- " to the annual circulation, and pervade it in its utmost ex- " tent ; that no pecuniary fortunes be formed, or, at least, tha*^ 244' OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS employed to bring any commodity to thef market, naturally suits itself to the effectual demand, and constantly aims at bringing the precise quantity thither that is suffi- cient to supply the demand ; it follows, that this diminution of demand must occa- sion a similar diminution of the productions of the country. " there be a compensation between those that are formed " and those which, from extravagance, return into the circula- '*tion; for, otherwise, the amassing of pecuniary fortunes '* would impede the (distribution of a part of the annual reve- *' nue of the nation, and hold back part of the circulation of " the nation, to the prejudice of the advances necessary for '* the conduct of agriculture, of the recompence of the salary " of the artisans, and of the consumption incident to the dif- '* ferent classes of men who exercise lucrative professions : *' and this reduction would inevitably diminish the revenue *' reproduced." Maximes Genirales du Gouvernement EcO' nomique, par Quesnay^ " Le revenu est done le canevas de la d^pense proprement *' dite. II importe que le revenu soit depense, car toute " epargne sur le revenu est diminution de depense, et par une " suite directe de production et de revenu." — *' The revenue, *' then, properly speaking, is the groundwork of the expence ; " it is necessary that the revenue should be expended ; for ** every saving in the revenue occasions a diminution of ex- ** penditure, and, by direct consequence, of production and *« of future revenue.'' Philosophic Rurale^ ou Economic Generale et P ditique de }' Agriculture ^ p. 48. See also Wealtk of Nations, Vol. I. p. 70, and Vol. 11- p. 9, 4to edit. OF INCREASING WEALTH. 24ii Though the opinions of great and eminent men are here referred to for establishing the position, that a diminution of demand must occasion a diminution of produce, that is, of vvealtli J it is not on authority alone that this inference rests. The reasons why it must happen have been stated, and the pro- gress that a diminution of demand would probably make, in curtailing the produc- tion of commodities, was traced out in the case of a supposed diminution of demand for butchers-meat, wine, and mustard ; * and the same reason is applicable to every article of the produce of any country for which there exists a failure of demand. But if this effect necessarily attends a diminution of demand, which not only reason, but the authority of all eminent men, concurs in saying must ensue ; an ab- straction of demand, to the extent of fif- teen millions, must have occasioned a simi- lar deficiency of annual production. It fol- lows, therefore, that three hundred mil- lions (calculating the value of the fifteen * Seep. 82. 246 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS millions of produce which must have been annihilated at twenty years purchase) of real wealth would have been extinguished, before this accumulating fund, with all its boasted activity, could, in all probability, have converted one hundred millions of the revenue into capital. In truth, the effects of this diminution of demand, to the extent of fifteen millions, would have been much more formidable than what is here represented ; because it has already been established, that the dimi- nution in value of every commodity, occa- sioned by a failure of demand, must be al- ways much greater than the value of the demand abstracted. * Dismal as the consequences of this ex- periment must have been in diminishing the reproduction and revenue, there ap- pear, on the other hand, no good effects likely to have resulted from it in relation to the capital of the country, to counteract it€ €vil effects on the revenue. * See p. 88. OF INCREASING WEALTH. 24*7 The stockholders, who would have been tempted to sell by the offer of the Commis- sioners of this Sinking Fund, would, it is evident, have had in their possession fifteen millions of capital, upon the employment of which, in such a manner as to return a profit, their income, that is, their subsist- ence, must have depended. To acquire a profit, we know that capital must be em- ployed to supplant or perform a portion of labour, in producing or adapting commo- dities for consumption, and it is hardly possible to suppose, that there could have existed any new channels of so employing capital, at a moment when there was for^ cibly created a diminution of demand for commodities, to the extent of fifteen mil- lions. So far from its being reasonable to sup* pose there could have existed, under such circumstances, any opportunity of employ- ing an additional quantity of capital, it is certain, that so great a diminution of de- mand must have thrown out of employ some of that capital which was useful in 248 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS supplanting labour, in the progress of bring* ing to market those commodities, for which there could no longer have subsisted a de- mand. The only means, therefore, those stock- holders could have had of forcing the capi- tal in their hands into employment, must have been by offering to supplant labour, at a cheaper rate than that at which it was antecedently performed. A competition would thus have arisen ; the profit of capi- tal must have been diminished ; the inte- rest paid for stock or money must have fal- len, and of course the value of fixed annui- ties, or Government securities, must have risen ; and this must have continued pro- gressively, till capital became so abundant, and its profits so diminished, that the pro- prietors would have been induced to re- move it to other countries, where higher profits might be made ; and France would inevitably have been amply supplied with capital, the want of which is the great draw- back on her industry. Neither is it theory alone which points OF INCREASING WEALTH. ^49 out these evils, as the necessary result of such a measure ; for, as far as practice gives us an opportunity of judging, the accuracy of the inference is uniformly confirmed by experience. When Pope Innocent XI. reduced the interest of his debt from 4 to 3 per cent,, and employed the sum saved to accumulate, but a short time elap- sed till the new 3 per cent, fund sold at one hundred and twelve. In like manner, when the interest of the national debt of Eng- land was reduced, in 1717? from 6 to 5 i}er cent,, and the saving devoted to accumula- tion ; the consequence was, that in 1727, from the rise of public securities, there was an opportunity of again reducing the inte- rest from 4 to 3 per cent., and of applying an additional sum to accumulate. This, of course, produced another rise, and to such a degree, that, in the year 1733, we learn from authority, that " the sinking fund was " now grown to a great maturity, and pro- " duced annually about L. 1,200,000 ; and " was become almost a terror to all the in- " dividual proprietors of the public debt. 250 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS " The high state of credit, the low rate of " interest of money, and the advanced price *' of all public stocks and funds above par, *' made the great monied companies, and " all their proprietors, apprehend nothing " more than being obliged to receive their " principal too fast ; and it became almost " the universal consent of 7Jiankind, that a ** million a-year was as much as the creditors " of the public could bear to receive in dis- " charge of part of their principal." * ^ Nothing can more forcibly illustrate the truth of the opinions which have been stat- ed, than what Sir Robert Walpole here affirms. If he had been aware of the na- ture and the foundation of the profit of stock; if he had perceived the effects of forced parsimony, not only in depreciating those commodities from which it abstracts a portion of demand, but even in depreci- ating that for which it creates a demand j if he had written on purpose to support and * Considerations concerning the Public Funds, the Public Revenues, and the Annual Supplies, by Sir Robert Walpole. p. 56'. OF INCREASING WEALTH. 251 illustrate the theory here built upon, he could not have done it with more effect than by stating, " that a million a-year be- " came as much as the creditors of the " public could bear to receive." It is remarkable, too, that this is almost the only fact in the whole pamphlet, to the truth of which his adversary, in his reply, seems to subscribe. * And, indeed, Mr Hume, nearly twenty years afterwards, plainly shows, that he was aware of that circumstance, by stating, that, " in times " of peace and security, when alone it is " possible to pay debt, the monied interest " are averse to receive partial payments, * " You tell us, that the public creditors were so far from " making any provision for themsehes, either in their separate " or their corporate capacity, that the sinking fund should be *• applied to the discharge of their principal, that, whenever '* it hath been applied to this purpose, the only contest be- '* tween them hath been, who should not be paid. *' In another place you tell us, That the South Sea Com- '• pany were so far from looking upon their being first paid "off, as a privilege or beneficial preference, that they ex- " pressly provided against it : This, again, is very true, nor " have we denied it," The Case of the Sinking Fund, bein" a full Reply to a late Pamphlet, entitled, Some Considerations, &c. p. 27. 252 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS " which they know not how to dispose of " to advantage." * In the Estimate of the Comparative Strength of Great Britain, f Mv Chalmers also states, on the authority of Sir John Barnard, that the effects of the sinking fund were such in the year 1738, that " the great contest among the public cre- " ditors, at that fortunate epoch, was not " so much who should be paid his capital, " as who should be suffered to remain the " creditors of the state j" — ^yet, during the pr'eceding ten 3/ ears, the sinking fund had effected a diminution of little more than four millions of debt. J Further, the doctrine here maintained derives strong and ample confirmation from the progressive effect which the following • See a note to the first edition of Mr Hume's Discourse on Public Credit, wiiich is suppressed in the later editions. -J" Chalmers's Estimate, p. 1 14. + Principal of the National Debt, 172S, L. 51,028,431 Ditto 1738, 46,661,767 Intermediate Diminution, L. 4,366,664 Estimate, p. 1 15# ©F INCREASING WEALTH. 25S statement shows the sinking fund to have had on the price of public securities during the last peace. STATEMENT, showing the Prices at which 3 per cent. Stock was bought by the Sinking Fund, in every Quarter, tVom the beginning of the Year 1787 to the end of the Year 1792. 1787. 1788. 1789. ir. Pr. Qr. Pr. Qr. Pr. 2. ending Jan. 31. 74| 6. - 76 10. - 73^ 3. Apr. 30. 76 7. - 75^ 11. - 74 4. July 31. 74} 8. - 74i 12. - 761 5. Oct. 31. 71| 9. - 7H 13. ' 80| 1790. 1791. 1792. Qr. Pr, Qr. Pr. Qr. Pr. 14. ending Jan. 31. 78 18. - 79i 22. - 88i 15. Apr. 30 7Si 19. - 79i 23. - 96k 16. July 31 73^ 20. - 8 If 24. - 90i 17. Oct 31. 7H 21. - 88| 25. - 90i The gradual rise this statement exhibits, though occasionally interrupted by some accidental occurrences, that have, for the moment, retarded or accelerated its pro- gress, clearly marks the operation of a re- gular, steady, and uniformly progressive in- fluence, such as the accumulating fund must inevitably have produced. Yet dur- ing these six years, one would have ima- gined, that so many opportunies must have 254 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS occurred of employing capital in new chan- nels, that the accumulating fund being absorbed in new adventures, could not have diminished the value, that is, the in- terest of capital ; for the number of inclo- sure bills, of road and canal bills, never was so great in so short a time, * whilst the increase of our exports, f of the ton- * Table, showing the Number of Acts of Parliament for Roads, Bridges, &c. which passed in each of the following Years : Roads and brid- 1785 17 SO 1787 1788 i789 1790 17 9\ 179^^ Iota.. ges, 31 40 30 37 36 30 44 54 302 Canals, harbours. &c. 7 4 3 5 6 9 13 17 64 Inclosures, drain- ing, &c. 22 25 1.9 36 36 27 3.9 41 245 Paving, and otht'i parochial im- provements, The total, 20 14 14 14 18 20 20 19 139 80 ! 83 ! 66 92 96 86 116 131 750 f Amount of the Exports from Great Britain in the fallow- ing years : Year. L. 1786, - 16,300,725 1787, - 18,296,166 1788, - 18,124,088 Year. L. 1789, 20,013.297 790,-20,120,120 Year. L. 1791,-22,731,994 1792, - 24,905,400 OF INCREASING WEALTH. 255 wage of our shipping, * as well as the ex- tension of machinery in every branch of manufacture, was equally remarkable ; and it is certain, that the increase of produce and manufactures must have required an additional capital to circulate them. Experience, however, shows us, that this was not the case. Stocks rose from 74 to 96 ; that is, the interest or value of capital sunk from four pounds one shilling and one penny, to three pounds two shillings and sixpence per annum ; yet there was then only L. 1,000,000 a-year set aside for accumulation, and the whole sum ac- cumulated during the five years amount- ed to L. 5,424,592 ; * that is, to little more than a third of that which the temerity of * Account of the Tonnage of British Shipping cleared out- wards in the following years : Year. Tons. Year. Tons. Year. Tons. 1786,- 982,132 1789,- 1,343,800 1791,. 1.333,106 1787,- 1,104,7111790,- 1,260,828 1792,- 1,396,003 1788, - 1,243,206 + Report of the Select Committee, relating to the Public Income and Expenditure, 1791 ; Appendix, X. No. 1. With this sum, purchases were made of 3 per cent., and to the amount of L. 6,772,350. ^56 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS Mr Pitt projected, on the first year of the return of peace, to abstract from expen-- diture in the acquisition of commodities the produce and growth of the country, and to convert into capital. In the receipt of the income-tax, Mr Pitt, however, was disappointed ; it never much exceeded five millions and a half * But if he had remained Minister, and we had enjoyed peace, a sum to this amount would, till the year 1811, have been appli- cable to accumulation, over and above the sum of L. 5,585,572, f applicable to that purpose at the time peace was restored; that is, a sum of upwards of L. 11,000,000 would have been annually withdrawn from expenditure on commodities, the produce and manufacture of the coun- try, and applied by law to accumula- tion ; — B. system which never could have * The receipt of the income-tax for one year ending 5th April 1801, amounted to L. 5,711,150. — See Resolutions voted by the House of CommoDs. ■j- See No. 13. Accounts presented to the House of Com- mous, respecting the public funded debt, ' nd the reductiou thereof, 1802. OP INCREASING WEALTH. ^7 been carried into execution, without ef- fecting the ruin of the country, both by the diminution it must have occasioned of its produce and manufactures, and by the means it must have afforded of aggrandiz- ing our rivals on the continent, by furnish- ing them with capital. The income tax has now been repealed, and the sinking fund is new-modelled by the 42d Geo. III. cap. 71. By this law, the Sinking Fund established in 1786, and that of the year 1 792, the old and new Sinking Funds, as they are called, are con- solidated ; the provisions concerning the old sinking fund, as to the application of the interest after it amounted to three mil- lions, are done away ; the annuities, as they expired, are directed to be no longer car- ried to the account of the commissioners ; the one per cent, was dispensed with, on the loans of 1798, 1799, 1800, and 1802, amounting in all to the sum of L. 86,796,375, whilst provision was made for the practice being continued on all future loans ; the L. 200,000 annually granted is made a per- ^58 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS manent grant; and the produce of both the new and the old fund is made appli- cable to accumulate at compound interest, till the debt, amounting, at the time of pass- ing the act, to L. 48,987,656, * is extin- guished. Even now, then, on the return of peace, as the law stands, there will be an accu- mulating fund of more than six millions per annum, f Six millions must, therefore, be withdrawn from the acquisition of com- modities, the growth and manufacture of the country, and forcibly converted into ca- pital ; a situation which will require much attention from those who have the manage- ment of the country at the time. It is an experiment hitherto untried. The accu- mulating fund has risen to this magnitude during warfare ; and the effects of accu- mulation, during war, are more than coun- » See No. 1 3. Accounts presented to the House of Com- mons, respecting the public funded debt, &c. 1802. + The sum to be expended in the present quarter, by the Commissioners of the Sinking Fund, is L. I,668,l6l, 12s. Id. OF INCREASING WEALTH. S59 teracted by the extraordinary expenditure it occasions. The accumulating fund now provided by law, is nearly six times greater than any of which we have had experience during peace. Indeed, it amounts, in one year, to a sum almost equal to all that was accumulated betwixt the year 1717 and and the year 1732 j* which reduced the value of capital from 6 to S per cent. ; for, in this last year, 3 per cents, were at one hundred and one. It is larger, too, than the sum total of what was accumu- lated during the last peace, f and the Sper cents, were then gradually raised from sixty to nearly one hundred ; that is, the value of capital was reduced from 5 to 3 per cent. Under all these circumstances, those who * The sum-total applied for this purpose, during that pe- riod, amounted to L. 6,464,132. See Sinclair's History of Public Revenue, Part II. p. 122. + The sum issued to the Commissioners of the Smking Fund betwixt the 1st of August 1786, and the 1st of August 1791) amounted to L. 5,424,592. Report of the Committee of the House of Commons on the Public Expenditure, 1791? App. X. No. I. 260 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS have the management of the Public Trea- sury on the return of peace, must be care- ful, on the one hand, lest, from the abstrac- tion of demand to the amount of six mil- lions, the price of commodities be reduced to such a degree as to discourage repro- duction ; they must be cautious not to mis- take, for the effects of abundance, that which in reality may be only the effect of failure of demand. On the other hand, they must be scrupulously attentive to the effects of this forced increase of capital ; for, if 3 per cents, should by this means be quickly raised to par, or, in other words, if the value of capital should be reduced from upwards of 5 per cent, to 3, and the same causes continue to operate its farther reduction, in the present situation of Europe it will inevitably furnish other nations with what will render them most formidable. That both these consequences must en- sue is undoubted, and that, too, with a de- gree of unexpected rapidity. Of the ab- straction of demand to the amount of six millions a-year, from goods the growth and OF INCREASING WEALTH. 26l produce of the country, we have no expe- rience ; neither have we experience of the effects of forcibly adding six milhons annu- ally to the capital of the nation ; but since there existed an accumulatinf]^ fund in this country, six millions have never been ac- cumulated by the public even in a course of years, without creating such abundance of capital in proportion to the demand for it, as to reduce its value to 3 per cent, per annum. That the present situation of the country is different from what it was at any former period, is most certain. That it may, there- fore, be able to sustain a larger accumula- tion than formerly, is possible ; but accu- mulation of capital must, at all times, have its bounds, beyond which, if it is enforced, the consequences which have been stated must inevitably be produced. We already know, that the value of ca- pital may be reduced from 6 to 3 per cent by forced accumulation ; and it is impos- sible to say how low it may be brought by the continued progress of accumulation, 26^ OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS which increases the quantity of capital ; whilst, far from increasing, (by the effect it has of abstracting revenue from expendi- ture in consumable commodities, and con- sequently of abridging consumption,) it in- evitably diminishes the demand for it. If, indeed, the whole of the capital which must by this means be created, could possibly be kept within the country, it is demonstrable that, before any consi- derable progress could be made in this sys- tem of accumulation, the value of capital must be reduced to a trifle. Nothing but a confusion of ideas con- cerning the nature of the profit of capital could give birth to the fancy, or induce any one to cherish the opinion, that capital might be increased to an unlimited degree; for the moment the profit of capital is re- garded as arising from its supplanting or performing labour, it is at once evident, that, as the means of consuming must, at all times, limit the quantity of labour that can be employed in preparing things for consumption, so it must limit the amount OF INCREASING WEALTH. 26S of capital that can be used in co-operating with the hands of man, for the purpose of performing labour ; and that, in proportion as forced parsimony abstracts from the funds that would be allotted to acquire con- sumable commodities, the demand for la- bour, whether performed by the hand of man, or by capital, must be diminished. To what degree capital might be augment- ed, if produced universally over the world by the increased industry of man, directed to the production and formation of those things every way useful to supplant and perform labour, (the sole method in which the capital of a country and its wealth can at once be increased^ with benefit to man- kind, is a question we are not here called upon to agitate. What is affirmed, and what we have at- tempted to establish by argument, is, \st. That the old maxim, " a penny saved is a " penny gained," is not applicable to pub- lic wealth ; 2d, That a nation, in the cir- cumstances and situation of the British em- pire, cannot, with impunity, either forcibly ^64 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS abstract a sum so large as has been pro- posed, from expenditure in consumable goods of its produce and manufacture, or forcibly accumulate capital with such rapi- dity. For no nation, without injury to the pro- gress of its wealth, can thus rapidly in- crease its capital, at the expence of ab- stracting annually so large a sum from ex- penditure in consumable commodities ; and, in the present situation of Europe, if this country could, by parsimony, render capi- tal so abundant, as it is impossible to pre- vent the removal of it, it would be rela- tively injurious to our interest ; for the si- tuation of other nations, and those, too, whose interests, at present, we would least wish to promote, is such, that they would derive more benefit from it than would re- sult to the British Empire. In truth, though Parliament has formally announced, by an act of the legislature,* the extinction of the national debt in for- * See Appendix, No. VI, containing extracts of cap. 71, 42cl Geo. III. OF INCREASING WEALTH. ^265 ty-five years ; or, in other words, the de- sign of abstracting from expenditure in consumable commodities, and forcibly con- verting into capital, within that period, a sum amounting nearly to five hundred mil- lions ; that is, to more than six times what has been esteemed the amount of the whole capital now employed in the conduct of our foreign trade ; * — that act, sooner or later, must be reconsidered ; for the im- possibility of accumulating a penny till it amounts to the value of five hundred mil- lions of earths of solid gold, is not more apparent, than the impossibility, without the ruin of the country, of abstracting from expenditure, in its goods and manufactures, a revenue so large as L. 5,585,572, and that, too, annually increasing at compound interest for forty-five years, f * See Mr Pitt's Computation, Appendix, No. tV, •}" See Appendix, No. VII. where a statement is given of the sum that, under this system, if pursued, must every half year be abstracted from expenditure in goods the produce and manufacture of the country, and forcibly converted into capi- tal during the forty-five years, which, before the expiration of that term, will be found to amount to upwards of L. '20,000,000 /ser annum. ^66 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS Nothing, indeed, can be more absurd, than the golden dreams with which Parlia- ment and the nation have been amused through the medium of the calculations that have been formed on this subject. * Perhaps it may with reason be thought, that nothing could be more unfortunate than the faith that seems to be reposed in them. For though the sinking fund, the off- spring of this delusion, never can, without ruining the country, be accumulated to an amount equal to the debt of the nation, yet its existence has greatly facilitated the contracting of debt ; that is, it has enabled those who had the management of the government more completely to derange the natural and most advantageous distri- bution of the property of the country ; — that distribution, which, giving to the possessor the greatest real interest in the * See Appendix, No. VIII. containing a statement pre- sented to the House of Commons, 7lh April 1802, of the amount of stock which will be purchased in forty-five and forty.six years, at the several rates of interest, 3, 3|, 3f , 3^ and 4 per cent, by a sinking fund of L. 5,585,57'2 per annum. OP INCREASING WEALTH. 267 property he has to manage, affords the greatest encouragement to those exertions of industry in the conduct of it, which ahke benefit the proprietor and the pubHc. The extreme importance of the subject alone appears a sufficient apology for hav- ing gone so much at length into the consi- deration of the legislative provisions for paying off the national debt. But, indeed, it was necessary, in giving an idea of the origin and progress of wealth, to show that it can alone be increased by the means by which it is produced; and this could not be effected without investigating the conse- quences of parsimony, (which has been hi- therto considered as the most active means of increasing wealth,) and without fully explaining why parsimony, whether private or public, whether the effect of the deprav- ed taste of individuals, or of an erroneous system of legislation, far from being the means of increasing, must, if pushed be- yond a certain extent, prove fatal to the progress of public wealth. * * Since the publication of the first edition, the arrangement 268 OF PARSIMONY, AS A MEANS, &C. Having now endeavoured to do away the impression which prejudice has created on this subject, we are at hberty to proceed to the consideration of how far, and in what manner and proportions, the produce of land and of labour, whether performed by the hand of man or by capital, contri- butes to the increase of national wealth ; for as these constitute the sole sources of public wealth, so they must form the sole means of increasing it. of the sinking fund has been, on two different occasions, inter- fered with, but the same principle has, throughout, been perse- vered in ; and, as the subject is here introduced, not for the purpose of giving a history of that establishment, but to illus- trate the mistake that writers on political economy have fallen into, in considering parsimony to be a source of public wealth, it is therefore unnecessary to enter into minute de- tails of the plans that have been adopted ; mare particularly as the effects of this accumulating fujid have hitherto been uni- formly counteracted, even since the peace, by the money go. vernment has been under the necessity of borrowing, to defray the national expenditure, as will distinctly appear from the ac- count contained in the Appendix, No. IX, which shows the amount of debt contracted, and the amount of debt redeemed, in each year, from the 1st of February 1786, when the sink- ing fund was established, to the 1st of January 1818; and also, the total amount of unredeemed debt in each of these years. CHAP. V. OF THE MEANS OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, AND THE CAUSES THAT REGULATE ITS IN- CREASE. Though land, labour, and capital, have been considered as forming the sources of the wealth of mankind, and though we have endeavoured to establish the opinion, that wealth can alone be increased by the means by which it is produced, it does not from thence follow, tliat land, labour, and capi- tal, should each of them afford means of in- creasing wealth ; far less that they should, in different stages of society, contribute to- wards its increase, in any thing like similar proportioHvS. It has already been observed, that, in the early state of hi sexistence, man must have derived a greater proportion of his wealth 270 OF THE MEANS from land than at any subsequent stage of society. To the produce of the earth, which nature presented to his view, he must, at first, have had recourse for the sa- tisfaction of all his appetites and desires. His bodilv labour, in this state of socie- ty, must, in its object, have been similar to that of the other animals, calculated to appropriate and prepare for consumption those things which nature afforded ; and, under such circumstances, the share of his labour must have been small, indeed, which could either be supplanted or performed by capital. The club with which he destroys his prey ; the wooden knife with which he prepares it for consumption; the hook with which he draws towards him, and appro- priates the fruit of trees ; the hatchet of stone with which he obtains and fashions those his rude instruments, form nearly the whole capital that the history of savage na- tions displays to our view. Thus circumstanced, like the rest of the animal creation, on nature he depends alone for the means of contiiming his existence. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 271 The fertility of some seasons bestows an ample, the sterility of others affords only a scanty supply ; and man seems little to sur- pass other animals, either in dexterity in se- curing the objects his appetites suggest as desirable, or in ingenuity in preserving and adapting them for consumption. Even in this state, however, as an animal cannot be captured and appropriated, or a quantity of fruit collected and conveyed home without labour, his wealth cannot be considered as exclusively proceeding from land, though this is obviously the great and principal source from whence he acquires it. But the moment man appears in the state of a shepherd, or an husbandman, we per- ceive his labour, whether performed by his hands or capital, taking a new direction, and acting in a sphere peculiar to the hu- man species. It is no longer employed, like that of the other animals, in securing or fashioning the scanty supply which nature affords ; but points itself to the more important object. ^7^ OF THE MEANS of increasing the quantity, and meliorating the quality, of those productions of nature that are most desirable to him. The spontaneous produce of the earth, at first the chief source of his wealth, nowise contributes to the increase of it ; for it is to his personal labour, and that performed by the capital he creates, to which he owes the augmented production of those things, the first supply of which he derived from nature. The increase of the wealth of mankind may, therefore, be properly considered as arising from labour, whether personal or performed by capital, directed towards the increase of the quantity, and melioration of the quality, of the productions of nature ; and from that description of labour, whe- ther performed by his hands or by capital, from which, in a certain degree, he, in com- mon with other animals, derived the objects of his desire from his earliest existence ; to wit, from labour, directed towards appro- priating and adapting to consumption what forms his wealth. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 273 It must be observed, too, that this last source of the increase of the wealth of man- kind is, in the progress of society, in some degree narrowed, as the productions of the ocean are almost the sole objects of desire, that, in an advanced stage of society, re- main utiappropriated. In civilized society, therefore, with the exception of what he derives from the ocean, the wealth of man can alone be in- creased : — 1. By labour, whether personal or per- formed by capital, employed in increasing the quantity, and meliorating the quality, of the objects of his desire ; that is, by agriculture. 2. By labour, w^hether personal or per- formed by capital, employed in giving form to, and adapting commodities for, consump- tion ; that is, by manufacturing industry. Though we have already vindicated ma- nufacturing industry from the attempts of some philosophers, to prove that it is total- ly unproductive of wealth, it in truth, how- ever, acts a very subordinate part in the s T{4i OF THE MEANS formation of the increased wealth of every society, unshackled by legal restrictions or forced distributions of property. It is evident, that the wealth arisincj from giving form to, and adapting commodities for, consumption j must depend upon the production of a sufficient quantity of raw materials to be fashioned, as well as upon the existence of a sufficiency of food and necessaries, for the sustenance of those who are so employed. In civilized society, the multiplied rela- tions which the varied distributions of pro- perty create, tend to render the subject more obscure. Perhaps, therefore, there is no means of forming a more accurate idea of the relative importance of agricultural and manufacturing industry, in increasing the wealth of a community, throughout the whole progress of society, than by con- sidering the relative importance of land and labour, in the formation of wealth, antece- dent to the period in which man directed his labour to the object of increasing the quantity, or meliorating the quality, of com- OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 275 modities : for agricultural industry main- tains, in all periods of society, the same pre- eminent relation to manufacturing industry, in the formation of wealth, that land then bore to labour ; as man, in that state, de- rived from the spontaneous productions of the earth, accurately and distinctly, the same description of wealth with which, at subsequent periods of society, agricultural industry exclusively furnishes him ; w^hilst, in like manner, manufacturing industry contributes to his wealth in every stage of society, comparatively in the same degree that labour, whether performed by his hands or by capital, did in that early and rude period of his existence. In different civilized societies, the distri- bution of manufacturing industry, employ- ed in preparing the produce of the earth for consumption, is various. Great quan- tities of it, in some communities, are ex- pended for the satisfaction of the desires of a few, whilst the rest of the society uncon- sciously suffer, not only from the loss of the share of manufacturing industry, in ^76 OF THE MEANS adapting for consumption what forms the objects of their desire; but from a diversion to the formation of those things that are calculated to flatter the whims of the luxu- rious, of a great portion of that labour and capital which would naturally, and more advantageously for the community at large, be employed in procuring, by means of agricultural industry, an ample supply of the necessaries of life. Though, from this circumstance, manu- facturing industry, in some societies, ac- quires an appearance of importance, yet the relation which, from the nature of things, agricultural and manufacturing industry must inevitably bear to one another, never can be altered. In considering the increase of the wealth of mankind, it is the causes that regulate the distribution of industry, and the conse- quences that arise from the manner in which it is distributed, that form by far the most interesting objects of speculation : and it is these which will here form the chief subject of consideration. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 277 Before, however, proceeding to this in- vestigation, the relative importance of la- bour and capital in increasing wealth, whe- ther employed in manufacturing or agri- cultural industry, presents a question which forces itself into consideration by the man- ner in which it has been treated by almost all writers on political economy. The dexterity that man acquires in per- forming labour, by confining himself to one particular branch, has been dwelt upon from the times of Xenophon to the present day. * * ** Nor are these, which have been mentioned, the only " reasons why the dishes sent from the king's table are " grateful to those who receive them ; they are, in themselves, " far more delicious to the taste than others. And, indeed, " it is not surprising that this should be the case; for as " other arts are practised to much greater advantage in " large cities, so the king's viands are dressed in the most " exquisite manner. For, in small towns, the same per- " sons are employed to make a bedstead, a door, a plough, " a table : — (frequently, too, the very same man is a house- '* builder, and thinks himself well off if he thus finds a *' sufficient number of employers to enable him to earn a " livelihood. It it impossible, however, that a man prac- " tising a great variety of trades can be expert in them *' all :)-P-but, in great cities, where there are many who 278 OF THE MEANS This idea has, indeed, been carried so far, that the legislation of some countries seems to have been conducted on the per- " have a demand for each article, an individual gets a suf- " fjcient living by exercising a single profession; — and not " even the whole of that ; but one makes shoes for men, and *' another for women only. Sometimes even one man *' maintains himself by sewing shoes, and another by cutting ** them out: one by cutting and shaping garments, and ano- *' ther, without interfering with any other part of the business, *' by joining the pieces together. A man, therefore, who con-p ** fines himself to one simple department of workmanship, *' must, of necessity, execute it in the best manner. The case ^' is precisely the same with respect to the preparing of food • *' for he who has but one and the same person for his bed- *' maker, his butler, his baker, his cook, and his caterer, must *' lay his account with being but indiflfercntly served ; but ** where the sole occupation of one person is to manage the '* boiling, and of another the roasting of the meat; where one *' is engaged only in boiling, and another in frying fish; *' where one makes bread, not of all sorts, but restricts himself ••* to the furnishing of one species of an approved good quali- " ty ; it seems to me, that, while the work is thus arranged, it ^' must, in its several parts, be performed in the most perfect ** manner." Cyrop. Book viii. This passage in Xenophon was pointed out to me by my learned friend Professor Dalzel, to whom I owe likewise the above translation. See the original, Appendix, No. X. " The advantages accruing to mankind, from their betaking " themselves severally to different occupations, are very great " and obvious ; for, thereby, each becoming expert and skilful " in his own particular art, they are enabled to furnish one OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 279 suasion, not only that labour was best per- formed when the attention is confined to one particular branch ; but, on the belief that men acquire additional dexterity, in executing that species of labour wliich they have seen perfi>rmed from their earliest in- fancy. On this principle, professions have been made hereditarv, as was the case in Egypt in some parts of India, and in Peru. But the inconveniencies of this system are apparent, and the idea has been generally reprobated. The opinion that the division of labour was beneficial, seems formerly to have been sanctioned by the legislature of this coun- try, as it was enacted by a statute, 27th of Edward III., " That artificers, or handi- " craftsmen, should use but one mystery ;'' and, of late years, the advantages attending the division of labour have been esteemed of such primary importance, by the author '* another with the products of their respective labours, per- «* formed in a much better manner, and with much less toil| ** than any one of them could do of himself." — Harris's Essay ®n Money and Coins, Part I. p. l6. 280 . OF THE MEANS of the Wealth of Nations, as to hiduce him to declare, that " it is the great multiplica- " tion of the productions of all the difFer- " ent arts, in consequence of the division " of labour, which occasions, in a well-go- *' verned society, that universal opulence " which extends itself to the lowest ranks " of the people." * The extreme advantage of the division of labour, in m creasing wealth, is an idea which appears to be derived from contem- plating the number of distinct operations that contribute towards the formation of some of our most trifling manufactures, such as the trade of pinmaking, the pro- fession which is, indeed, generally resorted to, to illustrate the importance of the divi- sion of labour. Even in the conduct of this manufacture, however, the benefit obtained by any de- gree of habitual dexterity, that can be cre- ated by the division of labour, or by the saving of time which would otherwise be * Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 13. 4to edit. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 281 lost in passing from one species of work to another, nowise contributes towards expe- dition in forming the article, in comparison of the circumstance of supplanting and pei- forming labour by capital. Without the machinery, which the faculty that man possesses of supplanting labour by capital introduces, no great progress could have been made in the rapidity with which pins are formed ; and one man, with the use of this machinery, though he goes through and performs all the operations himself, must obviously manufacture more pins in an hour, than would be performed in a month, or even in a year, by any number of men amongst whom the labour could be divided, if unaided by the circumstance of part of their labour being supplanted and performed by capital. It is, in truth, the great and distinguish- ing advantage which man possesses of sup- planting and performing labour by capital, in conjunction with the power of directing his labour to the increase of the quantity, and melioration of the quality, of the pro- 282 OF THE MEANS ductions of nature ; (both faculties peculiar to the human species,) which form the means of procuring the wealth and com- forts enjoyed by civilized society. In the annals of the transactions and ne- gociations that have taken place between different nations on the subject of commer- cial arrangements, the danger of admitting 9, country to a commercial competition, because the division of labour was there carried farther than in any other, is a thing unheard of; whilst the constant and uniform ground of objection, urged by men whose prejudices lead them to think that a com- mercial intercourse may be conducted be- twixt two nations, in a manner advantage- ous to one, and injurious to the other, is the superiority that the one country has over the other, derived from dexterity in supplanting and performing labour by ca- pital. * * See' Appendix, No. XL containing extracts from twip dififerent memorials published in France at the time of th^ Commercial Treaty with this country. 7 OP AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. Q83 If, indeed, further confirmation was wanting to establish that this is the essen- tial circumstance which gives birth to all improvement in the execution of labour, it is amply to be found in every statement that ever came from any man practically concerned in any branch of manufacture ; as it is uniformly to the introduction of some sort of machinery, to the effects of the application of chemistry to manufactures, or to the increase or command of capital en- abling the manufacturers to reduce the price, to which the extension of sales is at- tributed ; * and if the explanation that has been given of the nature of the profit of stock is just and satisfactory, it follows, that ascribing the success of a manufactory to the command of capital, is, in other words, attributing it to the circumstance of labour being supplanted by capital, as ca- pital can alone be advantageously and pro- fitably employed in performing this office. * See, on this subject, Appendix, No. XII. where various examples in support of this opinion are extracted from differ- ent commercial publications. 284 OF THE MEANS It is regarding the division of labour as the great source of human improvement, that has led the author of the Wealth of Nations to state, that " the impossibility of " making so complete and entire a separa- " tion of all the different branches of la- " hour employed in agriculture, is perhaps " the reason why the improvement of the " productive powers of labour in this art *' does not always keep pace with their im- " provement in manufactures ;" * whereas, in reality, nothing exhibits in so striking a point of view the improvement of the hu- man race in the dexterous execution of la- bour, as the expedition and success with which, b}^ two or three individuals, a large field is prepared for the reception of seed, compared with the time that it would cost ten times the number of men to do the same work, if unaided by the operation of capital in supplanting labour; and with the imperfect manner in which it would, after all, be executed, if the work w^as to be performed by the hand of man alone. * Wealth of Nations, Vol. II. p. 8. 4to edit. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 285 Nothing has a more powerful effect in misleading even the best and most accurate understandings, than an anxious desire to maintain a favourite opinion, or to support a favourite theory ; and there is perhaps no stronger illustration of this unfortunate tendency, than wliat is to be derived from the strained manner in which it has been attempted to estabUsh the opinion, that the division of labour is the cause of that uni- versal opulence which fortunately prevails in many civilized societies. To impress this belief, the introduction of machinery has been stated as originally owing to the division of labour, of which it is considered as a mere consequence. But,in truth, the history of man shows us, that the simplest and most efficacious machines for supplanting labour — (instru- ments with which habit has so familiarized us, that we hardly dignify them with the name of machinery) — are introduced, at an early period of society, when the division of labour is comparatively unpractised and unknown, for the purpose of supplanting ^86 OF THE MEANS the personal labour of man in the conduct of agricultural industry ; — an art which, though its pre-eminence in the production of wealth is acknowledged, (even by those who wish to establish, tliat the division of labour is the great source of the increased opulence of mankind,) is in no period of society distinguished by reaping benefit from the division of labour. * * '' The superiority which the industry of the towns has " everywhere in Europe over that of the country, is not alto- *' gether owing to corporations and corporation laws. It is " supported by many other regulations. The high duties upon " foreign manufactures, and upon all goods imported by alien '* merchants, all tend to the same purpose. Corporation laws " enable the inhabitants of towns to raise their pi ices, without *' fearing to be undersold by the free competition ot their own " countrymen. Those other regulations secure them equally "against that of foreigners. The enhancement of price occa- " sioned by both, is everywhere finally paid by the landlords, " farmers, and labourers of the country." Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 159. 4toedit. " Land, mines, and fisheries, require all both a fixed and a " circulating capital to cultivate them ; and their produce re- " places with a profit nut only those capitals, but all the others « in the society." Ibid. p. 338. *' This impossibility of making so complete and entire a se- " paration of all the different branches of labour employed in " agriculture, is, perhaps, the reason why the improvement of *» the productive powers; of labour in this art does not always OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 287 Neither does it appear, that there is any ground for attributing to this circumstance the modern improvements of machinery, in the conduct of manufacturing industry. The division of labour tends to confine the attention ; and, of course, the knowledge of the workman, to the performing of one simple operation : whereas, the perfection of manufacturing machinery is to com- bine and embrace the execution of the greatest possible variety of operation in the formation of a commodity, by the use of *' keep puce with their improvement in manufactures.'' Ibid, p. 8. " It is the great multiplication of the productions of all the " difterent arts, in consequence of the division of labour, '• which occasions, in a well-governed society, that universal " opulence which extends itself to the lowest ranks of the peo- " pie." Ibid. p. 13. Though, from the two first of these passages, it appears that land is considered by the author of the Wealth of Nations as the great, and almost sole, source of wealth ; and though, in the third passage, agriculture is stated to reap comparatively but little benefit from the division of labour; yet, in the last the division of labour is deemed to be the cause of that univer- sal opulence, which, as a well-governed society, extends itself to the lowest ranks of the people. Hotio can these opinions be reconciled ? 288 OF THE MEANS one machine. * It appears, therefore, that the habits of thinking, which the division of labour tends to generate in the manufac- turer, (if they have any effect on the in- vention and improvement of machinery,) must be detrimental ; as they are destruc- tive of that train of thought which leads to the perfection of machinery. Indeed, the division of labour has been recently regarded as hostile to the perfec- tion of manufacturing industry by some writers, vvdio, without any display of the- ory, exhibit great practical intelligence concernino; the conduct of our manufac- tures. In some of our most successful and important branches of manufactory, those * Of this any one may be satisfied, who chooses to look at the cotton mills now in use, or at the machines formed on the model of that at Derby, for the erecting of which, in 1734, Parliament rewarded Sir Thomas Lombe. — " This machine is " said to have contained 26,586 wheels, and 97i74() move- " ments, that work 63,726 yards of silk at every turn of the " wheel; that is to say, 318,504>,9G0 yards in twenty-tour " hours, at three turns of the wheel per minute." Advantages and Disadvantages of Great Britain with regard to Commerce, p. 122. Load. 1754-. 11 OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. SS9 companies are stated to be the most pros- perous, who concentrate, under one con- cern, the whole process the raw material undergoes, till it is fit for use. To this concentration the cotton trade is said to be indebted for its present flourishing state ; and the same system is now preva- lent in the manufacture of woollen cloth. The routine of business, when conducted in this manner, is reduced into so regular a form, and so little time is lost in going from one operation to another, that the manufac- turer, two months after receiving the raw material from the merchant, can with ease return the piece goods ready for exporta- tion, which could not be effected, if all the various operations were subdivided, and the conduct of each formed the object of a separate concern. * * A few years ago, (and in some parts it is still so,) the card- ers and rowers of cotton wool were a distinct body from the Spinners of the yarn; but now the majority of our spinners find it much more to their interest to embrace and carry on this branch of the business within therasflves ; and the most prosper- ous companies in the trade are those who concentrate, under one concern, the whole process of the manufactory from the ra'y T 290 OF THE MEANS The eagerness and anxiety of the author of the Wealth of Nations to enforce this material, until the article is fit for use. The routine of business is reduc( d to so regular a form, so little time is lost in going from one operation to another, and articles of such superior texture are produced at so easy a rate, that I may saiely say» to this concentration alone is the cotton trade indebted for its present flourishing situation ; and were the whole manufactur- ers throuohuut the kmgdoro thus to be combined, it would turn easily upon one hinge without giatmir or jarring. It IS a known fact, that, in this mode, the manufacturer has frequently received the raw materials from the merchant, and in the course of two months returned the piece goods ready for exportation. But, if these different operations are subdi- vided, could we supply the foreign merchants with -the best piece ^o')ds at the lowest prices? — Circumstances which in- crease the demand, and are undoubtedly objects of the greatest national advantage. No persons, therefore, but those who confine themselves solely to the exportation of twist, can ob- ject to this plan ; and their objections are only grounded upon their individual interests, not those of the country. The dyers also, by adopting this course, have risen to what they U'lW are. They were formerly employed, by the country people and shop-keepers, to stamp and dye remnants of cloth; and thus acquired the name of stampers or printers. These fancy articles came into vogue, and the demand for them increasing, the printer augmented his number of hands. In the course of time, in the country, the printer's esta- blishment being increased, he did not choose to risk a pre- carious employ, but began to purchase the cloth itself, and proceed to print on his own account. This being one step to improvement, he next found it would be still more to his ad- OP AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. gQl his favourite opinion, has made him assert, that " a great part of the machines em- vantage to become his own weaver ; this measure also suc- ceeds ; and in the course of a short time, he betakes himself to spinning, and we find him ultimately his own spinner, wea- ver, bleacher, dyer, and printer, and enabled to produce an elegant fabric at an easy rate.-1-Observations founded on Facts, upon the propriety or impropriety of exporting Cotton Twist, by G. Walker, p. 26, printed 1803. To the same eflFect is the following quotation from the Sta- tistical Account of the Parish of Galashiels : " Of those who purchase wool, and superintend the whole *' process of making it into cloth, there are 13 masters who " employ, at present, 50 journeymen and apprentices in assort- " ing, scouring, and scribbling the wool, before it is given out to " spin, and in scouring, milling, dyeing, cropping, pressing, and ** finishing off the cloth. The unwearied attention which they " bestow on all the various departments of their complicated " employment, and the proficiency which they have attained, *' have obtained for them, many years successively, almost all " the premiums advertised by the trustees for cloth of 5s. 4s. •' 3s. and 2s. value per yard. It is, however, on the whole, rec- *' koned a disadvantage, that so many different objects must ** occupy their attention. In England, there are wool-sorters " who buy and prepare the wool for spinning ; spinsters who " buy it, and sell the yarn to weavers, who again sell the webs •' after they are wrought and scoured. In some places, they ** are purchased by dyers, and after being milled and dyed, ** are sold again to those whose province it is to fit and po- •' lish them for the market. From the materials thus becom- ** ing the actual property of those through whose hands they " pass, in the different stages of the work, it may be pre- 292 OF THE MEANS " ployed in those manufactures in which " labour is most subdivided, were original- ^' sumed, that the several parts of it will be more expedi- " tiously and better done, to insure its selling quickly and ** to good advantage. As spinsters will learn to examine the " wool, weavers the yarn, and dyers the web, before making *< a purchase, all of them are thereby stimulated to take the '♦ greater care, and to avoid all faults and blemishes, which " would hurt the sale, or lessen the profits of their labour. <* Besides, it seems probable, that the fewer employments any •* man follows, the greater will be his proficiency in them. *' They who constantly and exclusively are kept scribbling *' wool, will make more, and to better purpose, than others *' who are accustomed equally to perform every branch of *' the manufacturing line. In like manner, the finest dye will " always be given by him whose sole business it is to mix *' and prepare the colours and fix them on the cloth ; and the " smoothest polish will come from the hands which are only *' put forth to the shears, the teazle, and the press. In opposi- *' tion, hovi'ever, to this reasoning, specious and conclusive as " it may appear, fe-ome intelligent manufacturers have pre- *' ferred their own method of conducting the whole process ** from first to last; asserting, that, from universal experience, *' the yarns and webs which they purchase are greatly in- ** ferior to those made under their own eye; and assigning as '* the reason of this inferiority, that having the absolute di- ** rection both of spinning and weaving, and a perfect know- *' ledge of the respective abilities of such as they employ in *' these departments, they must easily perceive, and can keep *' out of their webs, all faulty yarn ; they must be acquainted ** with all defects in weaving ; and if they are of a nature not <* to be corrected or concealed by the subsequent operations " which the cloth undergoes, they can make both spins tei-s OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, kc, 293 «^ ly the inventions of common workmen, " who being each of them employed in " some very simple operation, naturally " turned their thoughts towards finding " out easier and readier methods of per- " forming it." * The inaccuracy of the fact cannot escape any one conversant with the history of machinery ; but if it was true, it would un- fortunately have, in some degree, the effect of overturning the very opinion it is meant to support ; as it would prove, that the di- vision of labour had not the same happy ef- fect in the improvement of machinery, that it is said to have in the manufacture of other things ; common workmen, or men who execute a variety of other work, hav- <' and weavers accountable for the several mistakes which *' cannot thus be amended. And the excellence of all cloth *^ depending, in a great measure, on the equality of the yarn, " both as to fineness and twisting, they have the advantage " of knowing and employing the hands which come nearest *' to each other in these respects, and the weavers who excel *' in working fine or coarse yarn " — Statistical Account, Yqh II. p. 311. ^ Wealth of Nations, Vol. I p. 12, 4to edition. 294 OF THE MEANS ing been more fortunate in inventing and improving machines than machine-makers, or men whose labour is solely confined to that particular employment. The truth is, the division of labour con- tributes (as is well illustrated in the pas- sage of Xenophon formerly referred to) * much more to the nice execution of some branches of refined manufacturing indus- try, than, as is generally conceived, to any branch of manufacturing industry being executed with great increase of rapidity. In this last respect, too, it may have some influence, in consequence of its tendency to improve the dexterity of the workmen ; but this circumstance co-operates, in so small a degree, with the power of perform- ing labour by capital, in producing this ef- fect, as nowise materially to invalidate the general conclusion, — That it is to the cha- racteristic faculty which man possesses, from the earliest period of his existence, of applying mechanical principles to the con- * Seep. 277 OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &;C. 295 struction of tools and machines, calculated to perform and supplant labour, and to his powers of using capital for the same pur- pose in all his commercial relations, as well as in every transaction which requires the exertion of labour, that he owes the ease and woiiderftd rapidity with which labour is ex- ecuted ; and, consequently, that extended opulence which expands itself throughout civilized society. " It is evident, upon a moment's reflec- " tion," (says an anonymous writer, who seems to possess a thorough knowledge of all our manufactures,) " that almost every " convenience and external comfort we en- " joy, depends upon the singular skill of " man, in the invention and use of ma- " chines. By this skill our fields are cul- " tivated, our habitations are raised, our «* garments are manufactured, our ships are " built, and knowledge is acquired and dif- " fused, in company with the general ad- " vantages of commerce, from pole to pole. " Read the history of mankind ; consider "the gradual steps of civilization, from 296 OF THE MEANS " barbarism to refinement, and you will " not fail to discover, that the progress of " society, from its lowest and worst, to its " highest and most perfect state, has been " uniformly accompanied, and chiefly pro- " moted, by the happy exertions of man, " in the character of a mechanic or engi- *^ neer. Let all machines be destroyed, *^ and we are reduced in a moment to the " condition of savages ; and in that state " man may, indeed, exist a long time, " without the aid of curious and complex *^ machines ; though, without them, they '^ can never rise above it." * When Mr Hume, in the middle of last century, supposed that the progress of hii- man industry, in any country, was bound- ed and confined by the check it must re- ceive from the augmentation of wages, and " that manufactures gradually shift their ^' places, leaving those countries and pro- " vinces which they have already enriched, * Letters on the utility of employing Machines to shprtea Labour, printed 1780. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 297 " and flying to others, whither they are " allured by the cheapness of provisions " and labour, till they have enriched these " also, and are again banished by the same " causes ;" * he did not sufficiently attend to the unlimited resources that are to be found in the ingenuity of man in invent- ing means of supplanting labour by capi- tal ; for any possible augmentation of wages that increased opulence can occasion, is but a trifling drawback on the great ad- vantages a country derives from the inge- nuity of man in supplanting labour by machinery, as well as from capital laid out in roads, canals, bridges, inclosures, ship- ping ; and employed in the conduct of home and foreign trade, all of which is alike engaged in supplanting the neces- sity of paying the wages of labour, f * Discourse on Money, p. 43. Edin. 1752. f The evidence of Mr John Wdllin^ton, clothier of Stinch- combe in Gloucestershire, strongly shows the important ef- fects of machinery in checking the rise of price, that would raturally take place, in consequence of the autimentation of wages. He states, " That, during his experience, Spanish " wool has risen 100 per cent,; he uses no English wools: 298 OF fHE MEANS The progress made of late years in Scot- land, in the art of distilhng spirits, affords a strong illustration and example of the vast resources of human ingenuity in abridging labour by mechanical contri- vances. In the year 1785, a proposal was made to collect the duty on the manufacture of spirits in Scotland, by way of licence, to be paid annually' for every still, according to its size, at a fixed rate per gallon, in lieu of all other duties. The London distillers, men the most ex- perienced in their profession, who agreed to the rate of the licence on the gallon, sup- posed to be equivalent to the former du- ties, declared themselves from experience satisfied, that the time of working stills " That the increase of wages has been 100 per cent, in the *' cloth-working branch ; and that the increase in the price of " cloth has been an advance of about 30 per cent. That the ** use of machinery, principally, is the feason, in his opinion, " that the prices of cloth have not increased in the sarre ratio «* with the prices of labour, and of the raw material used in " the manufacture.'' — ^ Report of the House of Commons from the Committee on the Woollen Clothiers* Petition, 1783, p. 9. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 2P9 with benefit was limited to an extent per- fectly well known, and that whoever ex- ceeded these limits, would infallibly lose, upon his materials and the quality of the goods, what he gained in point of time ; and, in conformity to their opinion, the duty was, in the year 1786, settled, upon the supposition that stills could be dis- charged about seven times in a week. Two years after this, in a memorial pre^ sented to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, the same men alleged, that the Scotch distillers had, by the ingenuity of their contrivances, found means to dis- charge their stills upwards of forty times a week ; and we since know, from a report made to the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury, in the year 1799, that a forty- three gallon still was brought to such a de- gree of perfection, as to be discharged at the rate of once in two minutes and three quarters, which is almost twenty-two times in an hour. * It appears also from this re- * " In a letter which I received a few days ago from Mr 300 OF THE MEANS port, that the operation of distillation was capable of being performed in a still shorter time, and that the quality of the spirit was nowise injured by the rapidity of the ope- ration. * Yet, in the conduct of this extraordinary improvement in the manufacture of spirits, there was no aid derived from the division of labour, nor could it once be thought of as a possible resource. Illustrations to the same effect might be brought from the wonderful improvements made of late years in bleaching, dyeing, spinning, weaving, as well as in the manu- " Millar, he informs me, tbat he has made a new still of the " same kind, that contains only forty gallons in the body, and *' three in the head, forty-three gallons in all : and that the *' state of working-with this still is as tollows : — From the com- *' mencement of the charge till the word is given to letofiF, two *' one-fourth minutes ; time of discharging half a minute - *' making the time of charging, running, and discharging, two *' three-fourth minutes only, which is almost twenty-two times <' in an hour.'' — Memorial of Dr Jeffray respecting the Distil- lation of Spirits ; printed in the Appendix to the Report on the Distilleries of Scotland, 1799, P- 392. * *' Believing then, as I do, that the quality of the spirits is <* not necessarily affected by the rapidity of the distillation,"- &c. Ibid. p. 401. 11 OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 301 facture of iron and copper, none of which derive, in their details, the smallest benefit from the division of labour. The annals of the art of weaving, from the earliest period, afford no record of any benefit that can be pretended to be derived from the division of labour. In the pre- sent improved state of this most important branch of our manufactures, the whole la- bour of forming the web, after the arrange- ment of the work, is, as it was in the rudest state of the art, the task of one man. Yet, when we compare the ease and expedition with which the weaver now executes his web in a loom, moved by water or by steam, with the process of taking up thread after thread, and counting and sorting them each time the woof is passed between them, there is no manufacture in which our progress towards wealth is more con- spicuous. The rapidity with which webs of the finest texture are now executed by the aid of machinery is generally known ; and Dr Robertson, on the authority of Ulloa, af- ter describing the native American as pur- 302 OF THE MEAhfS suing the tedious method of weaving we have contrasted with the modern practice, states, that upwards of two j'ears was fre- quently spent in finishing a small piece of the coarsest cloth. * Though the division of labour, therefore, may tend to produce superior execution in some refined arts, it is with confidence we again repeat, that the universal opulence which extends itself over civilized society^ conferring " on the frugal European pea- " sant comforts and accommodations ex- " ceeding those of many an African king, " the absolute master of the lives and liber- " ties of thousands of naked savages," f is to be attributed to two circumstances, both peculiar to^ and char act eristic of, the human species ; — to the power man possesses of di- recting his labour to the objects of increasing the quantity, and meliorating the quality, of the productions of nature ; — and to the power of supplanting and performing labour by capital, * Robertson's History of America, Vol. I. Note 83. ' t Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. 15. 4te edit, 7 OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &e. SOS As these great sources of human im- provement are common to all mankind, it becomes an interesting object of inquiry, — why all civilized societies have not deriv- ed equal benefit from them ? — and what are the circumstances that retard the pro- gress of industry in some countries, and that £cui(le its direction in all ? The effect of demand in regulating the quantity, the nature, and the quality, of those things which are produced by the la- bour of man, has been already pointed out and displayed. If the world had only one inhabitant, and if we could suppose that the time of this solitary individual was ful- ly occupied in procuring and forming for himself the various objects of desire he wished to enjoy ; it is evident, that a sud- den fancy to enjoy more of any one parti- cular article than the portion of labour he employed in obtaining it was capable of furnishing, would create a necessity of his allotting, for this purpose^ a farther portion of the time which he spent in procuring some less pressing object of his desire, in 304f OF THE MEANS order that he might acquire an additional quantity of the commodity of which he de- signed to increase his consumption. Now, an increased demand has a direct tendency to produce the same effect in thti arrangement of the labour of a society, that such a wish would produce in regulating the conduct of an individual. The advanced price, in consequence of an extension of demand, operates not alone as an encouragement to exertion in those who manufacture the commodity, for it creates a necessity of abridging the con- sumption of some less pressing object of desire, in order that the goods which were appropriated to acquire it, may be applied to pay the advanced price of the commo- dity for which there exists an increased de- mand ; and thus a quantity of labour is let loose from the manufacture of those things for which the demand is abridged, at the very time that its application is directed to, and encouraged in, the formation of that for which the demand is increased. By this means, an alteration is produced in the ar- OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 305 tangement of the labour of a society, pre- cisely similar to that which would be pro- duced in the conduct of an individual, (whose time was fully occupied in procur- ing for himself the objects of his desire,) by a wish to increase his consumption of any one article. It is thus, (as has been already explain- ed,) * that demand as effectually regulates the distribution of industry in every socie- ty, as the wishes and inclination of an in- dividual decides his conduct, and directs his efforts. Whatever, therefore, fixes or determines the proportion of demand that exists for different articles of wealth in any society, must regulate the distribution of its industry. Neither the private interests or prejudi- ces of particular orders of men, nor the po- licy of different governments, can succeed in directing the industry of a country into any particular channel, but through the medium of augmenting the demand for the * See page 105. U 306 OF THE MEANS commodities which that species of indus^ try produces. The despotic orders of a government, dictated by the vain specula- tions of its rulers, if not calculated to make an alteration in demand, can produce no permanent eifect on the , direction of hu- man industry. Pecuniary aid and assist- ance given to the manufacturer, may cre- ate, and even sustain, a losing trade ; but demand alone can create a flourishing trade, or direct the permanent application of the industry of a country into any particular channel. The great and important step, therefore, towards ascertaining the causes of the di- rection which industry takes in nations which are, to a certain degree, advanced in skill, dexterity, and judgment, in the means of executing labour, seems to be the discovery of what dictates the proportion of demand for the various articles which are produced ; and though this may not be at first sight apparent, yet a little at- tention to the arrangements and conduct of men in civilized society will, perhaps, OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 307 authorize the opinion, that it is not totally impossible to discover what it is that causes that variety of demand for different arti- cles, which is observable not only in differ- ent countries, but even in different places in the same country. The first, the universal, and the most ar- dent desire of man, is to procure what merely constitutes food ; the next is most undoubtedly to guard himself from the inclemency of the season. These desires he seems to possess in common with all other animals ; and they are perhaps the only feelings, in relation to wealth, that na- ture directly implants ; for, on examina- tion, we shall see reason to think all farther desires, with regard to wealth, (which are peculiar to the human species,) arise from the circumstance of the possession of wealth, which man alone, of all animals, seems to have the faculty of increasing by his own exertions. We often see the poor man living on coarse bread, made of inferior grain, satis- fying his thirst with water, covering him- 308 OF THE MEANS self with tattered garments, lying on straw, and enjoying, even in that state, content- ment and felicity. Increase his wealth, his desires extend themselves, and though, per- haps, it does not add materially to his hap- piness, he eats bread made of better grain, drmks some sort of liquor prepared by art, covers himself with better clothing, pro- cures a comfortable habitation, and, in pro- portion as he extends his wealth, he natu- rally enlarges his desires to views of com- fort in his clothing, as well as in other ar- ticles. But a demand for what constitutes the luxuries of life, can only exist on the part of those who possess wealth beyond what enables them to acquire the things which the habits of mankind induce them to re- gard as necessaries. For demand, in the mercantile sense of the word, is not to be considered as a mere wish or desire, but as a desire attended with the means of satisfy- ing the object of it ; it is the possession of these conjoined that constitutes what the author of the Wealth of Nations has called OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 309 the Effectual Demander ; * that is, the per- son with a view to whom the commodity can, in speculation alone, be manufactured or brought into the market. Goods, indeed, may appear for once in a market where there is no effectual demand- er ; though that is not very probable, as the foresight of mankind generally ope- rates as a preventive check ; and by this means it happens, that, without even an experiment, the extent and gradations of fortune seem universally to influence the quantity and quality of what is offered for sale. Thus, if the whole island of Great Bri- tain was suddenly divided into small pro- perties of one hundred pounds a-year each, no parliamentary regulations or encourage- ment could possibly prevent the extinction of the manufacture of those costly car- riages, the purchase of which might ex- haust upwards of four years revenue of one of those limited fortunes. It is, on the * Wealth of Nations, Vol. I. p. ^8, 4to edition. 310 OF THE MEANS other hand, obvious, that any regulation which could at once unite the property thus divided into fortunes of ten thousand a-year each, must, independent of all en- couragement, and in defiance of even very heavy taxation, instantly restore the demand for, and of course the manufacture of, those vehicles. The distribution of property could not, however, be changed from fortunes of one hundred to fortunes of ten thousand a- year, without, in every instance reducing ninety-nine families, antecedently possessed of one hundred a-year each, into a state of dependence for sustenance and employ- ment upon each of those men, amongst whom the property of the country by this hypothesis would be divided. The goods which the man of ten thousand a-year would immediately apply to the acquisition of carriages and other luxuries, must of course be withdrawn from expenditure in those things in the acquisition of which they were employed, when fortunes were divided in- to one hundred pounds per annurth OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 311 Each of the individuals who, antecedent to tlie supposed change in the arrangement of property, possessed a hundred pounds a- year, might naturally wish and desire to obtain the things to which he was habituat- ed ; but as this wish could no longer be accompanied with the means of obtaining the object, it could no longer give rise to a demand. Of course, the demand for that class of commodities must be diminished ; and the reduction of their value, created by this diminution of demand, must dis- courage that direction of industry, at a time when, in consequence of the supposed new arrangement of property, the demand for articles of luxury would raise the value of labour employed in the formation of them ; and thus effectually direct the labour of those who were thrown out of employ- ment, to that cliannel in which, by the nev/ arrangement of property, it was sure of being cherished by a constant demand. On the other hand, if the property had remained divided into small fortunes of one hundred a-year each, what would have 312 OF THE MEANS been the consequence? — Experience shows us, that proprietors of this class live, in general, on their estates ; indeed, want of means to deiiay the necessary expences of travelling confines them at home ; and as there is nothing so salutary for the improve- ment of a country as the eye of a proprie- tor, confined to a space of territory which he can himself manage ; so likewise, the expenditure arising from the residence of the proprietors must naturally encourage the industry of the country, and of course discourage those refined manufactures, the result of the accumulation of labour on raw materials, which distinguish the industry of towns. This view of the subject inevitably leads to the suspicion, that it is the distribution of wealth which regulates the portion of demand for different descriptions of commo- dities, in as cogent a manner as demand re- gulates the direction of the industry of a so- ciety, and of course the formation of wealth. Demand, as has been remarked, arises not only from having a wish or desire to 1 OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 313 possess k particular object, but from the de- sire of possessing being combined with the means of acquiring ; and it is here most important to remark, that though the mere wish or desire of possessing can never fur- nish the means of acquiring, yet a little ob- servation on the conduct of men shows us, that the means of acquiring very certain- ly and very rapidly instil the desire of possessing. It seems, therefore, an undeni- able inference, (if demand proceeds from the desire of possessing, combined with the means of acquiring,) that the distribution of wealth, which at once furnishes the means of acquiring, and regulates the desire of possessing, must imperiously determine the nature and extent of demand. * But it is not general reasoning alone which produces a conviction, that the dis- * The general feeling of mankind, of the incompetency of a mere wish or desire to constitute a demand, is forcibly expressed in the common and well-known proverb, Iftvishes ivere horses, beggars would ride; and the rapidity with which, the means of possessing communicates the desire of enjoyment, is expressed with equal cneroy in another proverb, Pui a beg' gar on horsebacle, he'll ride to the devil. 314 OF THE MEANS tribution of wealth, in all societies, must ultimately reo;ulate the formation of wealth. The same conclusion may be deduced, by a still plainer and more familiar process, from an examination of the situation, the habits, and the distribution of the property of mankind ; — a view of the subject which may be illustrated by examples innume- rable, uniformly eyincing, that, in every society, it is the wealth of the consumers who resort to the market, and the manner in which it is distributed amongst them, that uniyersally decide both the quantity and quality of the goods that are exposed to sale. We have often occasion to remark, in many of the small fishing-towns of Eng- land, where the goods generally exposed in the shops are of a nature adapted to the de- mand dictated by the property of tlie in- habitants, that the summer season no soon- er invites to the coast a number of opulent families, for the purpose of bathing, than there is transferred thither a quantity of goods suited to the demand which the for- "^ 10 OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 315 tunes of those who for a time visit the place create ; and the residue of these goods is at the end of the season constantly remov- ed, because the fortunes of the natives are not such as to create a demand for com- modities of that nature. It is to be observed too, that for the good of the place, as well as of those new shop- keepers who resort to it, it is necessary that those who thus for a time reside in it should not be too affluent ; for the tastes and habits which extreme affluence generates, natural- ly induce those who possess it to bring from a distance their wines, and many other arti- cles of their consumption, as well as to send to the capital for any new ornaments, or additional articles of clothing, which the fancy of the day may suggest as desirable ; so that not only the affluence of those who resort to the market, but even the degree of affluence, seems to decide on the nature and extent of the demand, which may be diminished as much by the extreme riches of the temporary visitants as by their po- verty. SIC) OF THE MEANS It was the luxurious habits of the French Court, generated by extreme affluence, that, with justice, gave rise to the complaint uniformly made by the inhabitants in and around Fountainbleau, that the short resi- dence of the Sovereign, in summer, created an additional demand for nothing but eggs, milk, and butter, as the courtiers brought almost every other article of consumption along with them ; and it is not improbable that shopkeepers and traders in and around that town, are at present deriving more be- nefit from its being converted into an Eng- lish prison, than they did from its being resorted to by the Court of France. The curing of fish is a means of increas- ing food, and of course wealth, which has occupied the attention of many of the ma- ritime powers of Europe. The legislature of this country has, in particular, made re- peated inquiries, enacted various regula- tions, and given, at different periods, very considerable bounties for improving and encouraging the curing of herring. The great object has been to imitate, OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &€. 317 and, if possible, to rival, the Dutch in this undertaking ; but the inquiries of commit- tees, the regulations in consequence of their reports, the bounties and encouragements granted hy law, the instructions given by Dutchmen dispersed throughout our fish- ing towns, to teach the process which has succeeded in Holland, have all proved inef- fectual. The herrings produced are as in- ferior in quality as ever to those cured in that country, and must remain so, if there was even much greater encouragement gi- ven ; for the consumers of the greatest part of the herrings cured in this country are the poorest of all men, — men absolutely depriv- ed of the power of possessing property, the slaves in our West India colonies ; whilst the consumers of the herrings cured in Holland are men of property and affluence in Germany and other parts of Europe, at whose tables that fish is introduced as an article of luxury. Till, therefore, the West India proprietor becomes as nice about the victuals of his slaves, as a German Prince is about the luxuries produced at 51 S OF THE MEANS his table, this country can never expect to see the curing of herring brought to an equal state of perfection as in Holland ; for the fortunes of the consumers in Germany make the excellence of the commodity the sole recommendation in that market ; whilst the situation of the slaves makes the cheapness the only recommendation in the West India market. Let any man examine the wretched clothing sent from this country to cover those who are employed in the cultiva- tion of the sugar-cane ; and then let him reflect, whether, if this was the chief source of demand for our linen and cloth, any possible bounty could induce our manufac- turers to produce lawn, cambric, or fine broad-cloth. This nation is at present the greatest commercial country in the world. There is hardly any people, in any climate, with whom our merchants have not dealings ; and if we examine the cargoes that are made up to suit the demands of different nations, we shall uniformly observe, that it OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 319 is the distribution of property, in each country, that dictates the nature and qua- lity of the goods that are sent to it. In India, property is most unequally di- vided. The poor man possesses the necessa- ries, but has not wealth sufficient to suggest a desire even for the comforts of life. The rich possess not only wherewithal to pam- per their appetites, but sufficient to satisfy their most refined desires. Accordingly, the cargoes which our India captains car- ry out, if meant for sale in the country and not for the supply of the Company's servants, uniformly consist of the most ex- pensive clock-work, of mirrors of the great- est size, of fire-arms of the most distin- guished workmanship, of lustres, and other ornamental articles, of a value even beyond what any European market requires. In the United States of America, on the other hand, property is more equally divid- ed than perhaps in any other country. Al- most every man possesses not only the means of procuring the mere necessaries of life, but his wealth is such as to extend his 30,0 OF THE MEANS demands to some articles of comfort in clothing, furniture, and habitation ; and there is hardly such a thing as a princely or overgrown fortune. ^ Accordingly, the goods sent to the American market are all comparatively low-priced, things calculated to secure comfort, not to attract admira- tion. Send to India a cargo of goods assorted for this market ; they will find no sale. The poorer orders might, indeed, have a wish for articles of this sort ; but in a coun- try where three half crowns per month is the usual allowance for wages, food, and clothing, they cannot have the means of procuring them ; and a wish, unaccom- • " The truth is, that, though there are in America few people so miserable as the poor of Europe, there are also very few that in Europe would be called rich ; it is rather a general happy mediocrity that prevails. There are few great proprietors of the soil, and few tenants ; most people culti- vate their own lands, or follow some handicraft or merchan- dise ; very few rich enough to live idly upon their rents or incomes, or to pay the high prices given in Europe for paint- ings, statues, architecture, and the other works of art, that are more curious than useful." — Information to those who would remove to America, by Dr Franklin, printed 1784» p. 5. OP AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. S2l paiiied with the means of obtaining a com- modity, never can constitute a demand. Neither could there exist, on the part of the native princes, any demand for such articles. They, itideed, have amply the means of obtaining them ; but this, with- out the wish or desire to possess them, cannot constitute a demand ; and these are not the commodities for which opu*. lence creates a desire. The things for which riches dictate a demand are articles scarce and rare, calculated to display splen- dour, and excite admiration, — " Non usu plebeio trita voluptus."* But the effect of the distribution of pro- perty is not alone to be traced out by con- templating its influence in determining the direction of manufacturing industry : it even goes so far as to regulate and decide the nature and condition of the animals reared and brought to the market for the food of man. England is the only country in Europe * Petron. Arbiter, Sat. cap, c^ix. 8. X 0j8^ OF THE MEANS where wealth is so diffused, that the great body of the manufacturers, that is, a great proportion of the people, can afford to en- joy a mixture of animal with vegetable food for their nourishment. * Where the wealth of man admits of his using a portion, but not of his enjoying a superabundance of animal food, it becomes desirable that it should be as fat as pos- sible ; as meat in this state goes furthest to season, relish, or kitchen, as it is vulgarly called a quantity of potatoes, pulse, or other vegetables. It is from this circumstance, that we find in England the fattest and the greatest quantity of fat meat in the world ; for no one who will read the nu- merous publications that have of late years appeared on agricultural subjects, can en- tertain a doubt, that it is the ease and afflu- * That man can be nourished at a much cheaper rate on vegetable than on animal food, is apparent, from the circum- stance of the lar^e quantity ol land requisite to raise enough of animal food for his sustenance, compared with the small quantity ot land that will priiduce a sufficiency to maintain him «)i> .1 vegetable diet. On this subject, see Appendix, No. XUL 7 OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 3Q3 ence of the lower orders of the people, en- abling them in part to subsist on animal food, and the circumstance that fat meat goes furthest in mixing with vegetables, from whence the demand for meat in this state arises. Of the new Leicester breed of sheep, now so much run upon, and so famed, for what, in the language of the grazier, is called their fatting quality^ proportionally speaking, none go to the London market ; that is, arrive at the table of the luxurious. Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, Wakefield^ New- castle, the seats of our manufactories, are the markets in which they are eagerly sought after, and the places where they are in general consumed. And if the wealth of the country was not so distributed as to put it in the power of this class of men to enjoy animal food, there would be no de- mand for meat fed to this extent ; because that extreme degree of fat is a quality, which, far from recommending it to, would banish it from, the tables of those whose 324 OF THE MEANS opulence has trained them on to dehcacy and refinement of taste. " On going to market one day, to sell «* our fat cattle," (says a respectable and very intelligent farmer,) " I was overtaken by " a gentleman from Scotland. Farmer, " said the gentleman, You make your sheep '« so fat, that I could not eat the mutton. " It matters not, Sir, replied I, because we " have plenty of customers for this kind " of mutton ; and allow me to say, it is " very happy that the great consumption " does not depend upon such as you. " Ask the pitman, the keelman, the " wool-comber, tlie weaver, the fabrica- " tors of metals, and all those various but " valuable class of manufacturers which «' abound in different parts of this island, " which of the two kinds of mutton they <• prefer ? would they not readily answer, " Take you the lean meat, large-boned, " and black gravy, but give us the small- " boned fat meat, with oil swimming in « the dish. And are not these the men OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 3Q5 « that make the greatest consumption in « fat mutton, beef?" * &c. In some parts of the south of Scotland, the desire of imitating the improvements of their neighbours in England, has intro- duced the new breed of sheep, whose pro- pensity to fatten has made them so much sought after. On the banks of the Tweed, in particular, such flocks are to be found. But there are few parts of that country where the lower orders habitually live on animal food. Morpeth, from its vicinity, is the market to which they are generally sent ; because, says the intelligent author already quoted, " the natives of Scotland " have not as yet learned to eat fat mutton, " like the pitmen and keelmen about New- " castle." The truth is, the common peo- ple of that country do not possess wealth sufficient to enable them to consume ani- mal food, otherwise it would not require much learning to give them a taste for fat * Observations on Live Stock, by George CuUcy, pp. 1'35, 126. 326 OP THE MEANS meat ; for whenever they do acquire the means of consuming a mixture of animal with vegetable food, the taste for meat in that state at once displays itself The proof of this is, that Glasgow and Paisley, the only places in Scotland where the body of the people possess that degree of opu- lence, are known to be the only markets for very fat meat ; that is, the markets where the demand for meat in that state ensures a superiority of price. Innumerable illustrations might be brought, uniformly tending to show, that the distribution of property determining the nature of demand, alone regulates and decides the channels in which the industry of every society exerts itself Perhaps, however, there is not a more powerful me- thod of bringing home this great and lead- ing truth to the conception of every man, than by taking a general view of the state in which property has existed in France and Great Britain, the two countries in Europe most distinguished for opulence and refinement ; and then contemplating OP AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 3^7 the method in which the distribution of their respective wealth has marked, dis- tinguished, and characterized, the industry of both these countries. In Great Britain, as we have already ob- served, wealth is more generally diffused than in any other country. Though there exist some great and overgrown for- tunes, they do not appear to have been formed at the expence of entailing general poverty on the community. The yeomen in some parts of the country, the farmers and manufacturers in all, when compar- ed with those of any European nation, have always been distinguished for the ease and even the opulence which J-hey enjoy. * In France, on the other hand, the wealth of the country for centuries was shared out and confined amongst the Nobility. They too had universally the habits of sacrificing the interests of their daughters and young- et sons to increase the wealth, and perpe- * Lord Bacon's History of Henry VH, 328 OF THE MEANS tuate the power of their representatives :— for the victims of the female sex, Convents furnished an asylum and retreat ; whilst Monasteries, Church-benefices, and the Army, were uniformly resorted to as means of providing for the younger sons. '* France" (says a well informed author, who wrote in the middle of the last cen- tury) " concentres in Versailles and Paris, " as in a single point, all the powers which " can attract mankind, — to Court, on ac- *' count of the greatness and honours, which " can be attained nowhere else, and which *' are for none but those who live at it ; — ^' to Paris, in which are not only all the " treasures of the state, but where all those " sulbjects of the state reside who are rich, ** either through the public or their own '^ private revenue ; so that all the wealthy " have fixed their habitation in this town, " from a preference owing to the neigh- *« bourhood of the Court." * It is to be * Remarks on the Advantages and Disadvantages of France and (Jreat Britain with respect to Commerce, 1754, p. 42. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 329 observed, too, that the privileges and ex- emptions from taxation enjoyed by the Nobility, greatly added to the effects of the unequal division of property ; for by this means, in proportion as the public debt and the expences of the Court increas- ed, the unequal distribution of riches be- came more marked and perceptible ; whilst the effects of this inequality appeared more forcibly from the extravagance of that No- bility in whose hands the wealth of the country was concentrated : *• That class, " who, in the service of the nation, have " always spent the capital of their for- " tunes, and who, when they are ruined, " give way to another set of the same " class, who in like manner spend their " capital." * Indeed, in no country was there to be found a portion so considerable of its riches * " Cette parlie de la nation qui sort toiijours avcc le capi- " tal de son Men, qui quand elle est ruinee donne sa place u " une aulre qui servira avec son capital encore," — Esprit de J.oiXf Liv. XX. Chap. xx. 350 OF THE MEANS shared out in large fortunes amongst so small a number, the expenditure of which uniformly and constantly took place on the same spot. " The opulent man, who lives on his " fortune, without any employment, con- " sumes by himself, by his menial servants, " by his parasites, the national productions " of the first necessity. So far agriculture " profits by his expenditure : but his pride " and effeminacy employ, to provide him " with lodging, with furniture, with cloth- " ing and equipage, the assistance of all the " arts that are naturalized in France ; it is, " then, the men of large fortune who fur- " nish the natural aliment of French in- *' dustry," * In Paris, (as, under such circumstances, our theory would lead us to expect,) those who * " Lp riche oisif consume par lui-meme, par ses valets, par " ses parasites, les denrees nationales de premiere necessite. *' L'aizricullure {trofite evid('mment de ces uepenses ; le faste " et la mollesse, empruntent pour le loj^er, le meubler, le vetir, '• le voiiurtT, le secours de tous les arts naturalises en Fiance j *' il est done l*alimcnt propve de I'liidustrie Frangoise.'*— Ephemerides du Citoyerif Ibm, II, 1766, p. 133. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. S31 excelled as hair-dressers, as tailors, as mil- liners, the most expert hands employed in painting china or carriages, and in cutting or setting diamonds, embroiderers of clothes and furniture, &c. received encouragement certainly equal, if not superior, to those em- ployed in the same line in London ; whilst we are told by Mr Arthur Young, that, from the information he could collect dur- ing his residence in different parts of France, country labour was 76 per cent, cheaper there than in England. This sufficiently shows, that the demand for country labour, in proportion to the number of labourers of this description, was much inferior to what it is in this country ; and that the proportion betwixt the demand for, and the number of, those * Country labour being 76 per cent, cheaper in France than in England, it may be inferred, that all those classes that depend on labour, and are the most numerous in society, are 76 per cent, less at their ease, (if I may use the expression,) worse fed, worse clothed, and worse supported, both in sick- ness and in health, than the same classes in England, notwith- standing the immense quantity of precious metals, and the im- posing appearance of wealth in France. »3o% OF THE MEANS whose professions are calculated to admi- nister to the desires of the affluent, even though their number was much greater, must have been equal, nay, superior, to what it is in England. But we know, that when the interest of men engages their attention to the forma- tion or manufacture of any class of com- modities, the alertness and dexterity in sup- planting labour by capital, which practice generates in any particular branch of manu- i'acture, uniformly lowers the price, at the same time that it improves the quality, of the articles produced. — '^ For it is so plain, *' that every man profiteth in that he most " intendeth, that it needeth not to be stood " upon. It is enough to point at it." * Accordingly, to establish the compara- tive superiority, excellence, and cheapness, of all articles in France which contribute to the splendid decoration either of the persons, the tables, or the apartments of men of fortune, we need only appeal to * Bacon's Essays, p. 83. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 353 those who have resided there, and who have enjoyed the society of the people of that country. Even in England, no one can go into the drawing-rooms of the affluent, or attend St James's on a birth-day, without seeing this superiority sufficiently displayed, by the quantity of French manufactures exhi- bited, notwithstanding the severest legal prohibitions, and those, too, enforced by the example of the Sovereign. On the other hand, to prove the superi- ority which England displays in the neat- ness and cheapness of all those articles which administer to the comforts of life, and which are within the reach of those who possess merely a competency j it is on- ly necessary to call for the testimony of any man who has even passed through the two countries. The neatness of the houses in and around London, and the splendour of the hotels in Paris, have constantly formed themes of remark to all travellers. What is universally matter even of loose observation among mankind, where interest 334 OF THE MEANS does not dictate the sentiment, is generally true, and may almost always with certainty be relied upon. Here, however, it is unne- cessary to trust merely to such a source of information. For the effects of the distri- bution of wealth on the respective industry of the two countries, is no where more strongly displayed than in the documents and memorials which the negotiation for a commercial treaty called forth ; and as this was evidently an occurrence calculated to interest the Government of both countries, in acquiring the most accurate knowledge of the subject, they seem to furnish a source of information which may with con- fidence be depended upon. From these it would appear, that when the commercial treaty between France and England was adjusted, in the year 1786, those who conducted it, as well as those who were consulted on the subject, uni- formly conceived, that France bad a deci- ded advantage in the manufacture of every thing for which affluence dictates a desire ; and that England, on the contrary, ex- OP AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 33S celled in the formation of all those ar- ticles which administer to the comfort of such as enjoy but a moderate degree of wealth. * ♦ See Appendix, No, X!V. containing extracts from various papers and memorials, written at the time of the commercial treaty with France, 1786. From these it appears, 1. That, in the article of cloth, the fine cloths of France were preferable to the fine cloths of England ; whilst, on the other hand, it was conceived, that the lower-priced cloths of England could meet with no competition either for quality or cheapness. 2. That, though France had a most decided superiority in the manufacture of rich silks, England was supposed to have the advantage in making of ribbons, stuffs mixed with silk, ice. &c. 3. That, in the article of linens, the superiority that France enj an idea of the situation of lands cultivated by metoyers, under the cul- ture practised, as Quesnay supposes, on thirty millions of acres of the arable land of Fiance. '■Z. A statement of the annual expenditure on one farm, and of the annual produce of ano- ther, ill the Carse of Gowrie, in Scotland ; to which is added, an account of the production of that district. By contrasting these statements, the reader will see how much the wealth of a nation depends on the direction of its in> tlustry. 344 OF THE MEANS necessary. Any attempt to state the pre- cise distribution of wealth which tends most to encourage the production of wealth, would be liable to the same criticism that the author of the Wealth of Nations has made on that table or formula, which the economists presented to the world as ac- curately displaying the order of expendi- ture most advantageous for a community. Dr Smith has truly said, that, as there are many regimens under which the human bodv enjoys health, so a country may en- joy, to a certain degree, prosperity under very different circumstances. * In general, however, it may be observed, that great inequality of fortune, by impo- verishing the lower orders, has every where been the principal impediment to the in- crease of public w'?alth. We know from experience, that no country of equal ex- tent ever enjoyed so much wealth as what is diffused over this island. We have a right, therefore, to conclude, that the dis- * Wealth of Nations, Vol. II. p. 271. 4to edit. 10 OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 345 tribution of property has been more fa- vourable to the growth of wealth in this than in any other country. In the begin- ning of the seventeenth century, Lord Ba- con, accounting for the advantages obtained by the English in their wars with France, ascribes them chiefly to the superior ease and opulence enjoyed by the common peo- ple ; * and it certainly appears, that, with still greater confidence, the superiority of wealth we enjoy may be ascribed to the same cause. * " Let states that aim at greatness, take heed how their *' nobility and gentlemen do multiply too fast ; for that ma- *' keth the common subject grow to be a peasant and a base ** swain driven out of heart, and in effect but a gentleman's "labourer; even as you may see in coppice-woods. If you *' leave your stadles too thick, you shall never have clean **■ underwood, but shrubs and bushes. So, in countries, if ** the gentlemen be too many, the commons will be base ; *' and you will bring it to that, that not the hundredth poll "will be fit for a helmet; especially as to the infantry, *' which is the nerve of an army ; and so there will be great *' population and little strength. This which I speak of has " been no where better seen, than by comparing of England ** and France ; whereof England, though far less in terri- ** tory and population, hath been, nevertheless, an over match *' in regard the middle people of England make good soldiers, *' which the peasants of France do not." — Lord Bacon's Es- •says, p. 80. See also his Life of Henry VII. S4/6 OP THE MEANS The wealth of mankind, it has been ob- served, * can alone be increased : — 1. By labour, whether personal or per- formed by capital, employed in increasing the quantity, and meliorating the quality, of the objects of his desire ; that is, bt/ agri* culture, 2. By labour, whether personal or per- formed by capital, employed in giving form to, and adapting commodities for, consumption ; that is, by manufacturing in-- dustry. The superior efficacy of the application of capital, for the purpose of executing every branch of labour, over the most im- proved manual dexterity, has also been ex- plained ; and the degree in which the in- crease of public wealth is dependent on this circumstance, has been illustrated and made manifest, f It becomes, therefore, of the greatest importance to remark, that, though the channels of expence of men of large and * See page 273. + See page 277, &c. OF AUG-MENTING WEALTH, &C. SV/ extended fortunes, that instil a desire for articles of taste, are often as unbounded as the fanciful imagination of those who ad- minister to the satisfaction of their caprices; yet their habits cannot possibly suggest ex- penditure, for the purpose of supplanting labour they are never called on to perform. On the contrary, the habits of a man pos- sessed of small fortune, which adds to those comforts his industry enables him to ac- quire, naturally suggest the desire of sup- planting the labour he performs, whilst he finds, in his moderate wealth, means of executing that which benefits himself, and enriches the community to which he be- longs. The description of Montesquieu of the nobility of France, as living on their ca- pital, might with justice have been extend- ed to those frequenters of all courts who are born to inherit large fortunes ; for the real source of increasing wealth is alone to be found amongst farmers, manufacturers, merchants, whose habits open their eyes to farther means of supplanting the labour S48 OF THE MEANS they perform or superintend, and which their small, but increasing fortunes, enable them to execute, with benefit to their pri- vate, and with still greater advantage to the public fortune. How different, in its effects, is this real source of increasing opulence from parsi- mony, which has been falsely held out as the active means of extending public wealth. By parsimony, it has been made evident, that capital, or the means of performing la- bour, is increased at the expence of ab- stracting a part of what would be expended in consumable commodities, which must, of course, diminish the demand for labour employed in producing and giving form to articles of consumption, whilst the power of executing it is increased. But the in- dustrious farmer or manufacturer, who dis- covers new modes of supplanting or per- forming labour, and finds in his small for- tune the means of establishing them in practice, procures for himself a greater pro- fit, and, at the same time, furnishes the pub- OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 349 lie with the commodity in which he deals at a cheaper rate. Whilst, therefore, he adds his augment- ed profit to his capital, there remains the same smii as usual, for the expenditure of his family in consumable commodities; and his customers having got the article he produces cheaper, must have a larger por- tion of their revenue than formerly, to ap- ply to the acquisition of other articles of consumption. By this means capital is increased, not (as by parsimony) at the expence of di- minishing the means of consuming ; for the augmentation of both is affected by the same operation, and the society acquires the power of executing an increased quan- tity of labour at the moment the means of consuming, and, consequently, the demand for labour, is augmented. Thus the distribution of wealth not on- ly regulates and decides the channels in which the industry of every country is em- barked, and, of course, the articles in the production of which it excels ; but a pro- 300 OF THE MEAKS per distribution of wealth insures the in- crease of opulence, by sustaining a regular progressive demand in the home market, and still more effectually, by affording to those whose habits are likely to create a desire of supplanting labour, the power of executing it. * * Though we do not recollect any attempt to show why the opulence of the lower orders tends to accelerate the growth of national wealth, or any reasoning to piove that it must have that eife.ct ; yet the fact (as appears from the following extracts) has not escaped the observation of the learned and ingenious. *' The advice of King Henry VII. (whereofi have spoken ** largely in the History of his Life) was profound and ad. ** mirable in making farms and houses of husbandry of a stand- *' ard ; that is, maintained with such a proportion of land *' unto them, as may breed a subject to live in convenient *' plenty, and no servile condition ; and to keep the plough " in the hands of the owners, and not mere hirelings. And *' thus, indeed, you shall attain to Virgil's character, which he " gives to ancient Italy. " Terra— —-potens armis atque ubere glebce." Bacon's Essays, p. 81. *' Above all things, good policy is to be used, that the trea- " sure and monies in a state be not gathered into few hands. " For, otherwise, a state may have a great stock and yet *' starve. And money is like muck, not good except it be " spread.^'' — Bacon's Essays, p. 39. *' Whether a people can be called poor, when the common OF AUGMENTING \\T:aLTH, &C. 34^1 Neither are these the only means by which a wise and fortunate distribution of wealth tends to produce an increase of the wealth of a country ; for when, in conse- quence of the mode in which Wealth is dis- tributed, industry is once embarked in the production and formation of particular commodities, and dexterity is acquired in preparing for the market things for which the distribution of the growing wealth of colonies and other countries create a de- sire ; a new and increasing demand encou- rages and sustains an extension of pro- duction greater than the wealth or the wisest distribution of wealth in any country, isolated and cut off from all coramunica- *' sort are well fed, clothed, and lodged ?" Queribt, by the Bishop of Cloyne. *' Quand le commerce est en peu de mains, on voit quelques *' fortunes prodigieuses est beaucoup de misere ; lorsqu* enfin " il est plus etendu, I'opulence est geiieiale, les grandes for- *' tunes rares." — " When commerce is in few hands, one sees *' some very large fortunes in the midst of general poverty; *' but when it gets into a greater number of hands, we see *' general opulence, and few large fortunes." — Discours de M. De Voltaire, a sa reception a V Academic Frangaise. S5Q OF THE MEANS tions with others, could either authorize or maintain. For skill in the means of supplanting and performing labour bj capital, which habit creates, and the power of executing it by the possession of capital, at all times insures to countries practised in different branches of industry, means of furnishing the com- modities for which growing opulence creates a desire, at a cheaper rate than they can be manufactured in a country where either the progressive increase of wealth, or a sudden change in the distri- bution of it, has given birth to new de- sires. It must be observed, too, that this new source of demand, as it creates an augmen- tation of production, and consequently of wealth, instils into the inhabitants of the country, advanced in any peculiar line of industry, new desires, which in return create a demand for things that the climate or soil of the society rising in opulence enables them exclusively to produce, as well as for things that the habits of indus- OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 353 try, and the soil and climate of a society in which the distribution of property is al- tered, enables them to produce, of a better quality, and at a cheaper rate. It is thus that commerce, though not a means of increasing wealth, must be con- sidered as the cause of increased industry ; for, by promoting an interchange of com- modities betwixt two countries, it becomes a most powerful agent in extending the de- mand for the manufactures of each, enrich- ing the one and the other, by exciting a quantity of industry that would otherwise have remained dormant ; but which, when thus brought into activity, augments the productions of both. To the economists (who maintained that value in exchange is the basis of all wealth, * that the increase of price is the increase of wealth, and that the riches of a country augment in proportion as the ex- changeable value of its commodities in- * Philosophic Rurale, p. 60 Z 354; OF THE MEANS creases) * commerce ought to have ap- peared a direct means of increasing wealth. A demand, on the part of England, for two thousand pounds worth of any particular French wine, as it must alter the propor- tion betwixt the demand for, and the quan- tity of it, must increase the value of the whole of that sort of wine. In like man- ner, a demand on the part of France, for two thousand pounds worth of English cloth in return, must alter the propor- tion betwixt the demand for, and the quantity of it, in such a manner, as to increase the total value of that commo- dity. It is impossible, therefore, to discern how the disciples of Quesnay, who regard- ed exchangeable value as the basis of wealth, should not have considered com- merce, which thus increases the value of the commodities of both countries, as a means of increasing wealth. Yet this sect of philosophers, uniformly^ * Physiocratie, p. 116. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 855 excluding from their view the effect which increase of demand must have in augment- ing the exchangeable value of the goods of all countries, amongst which a commer- cial intercourse exists, and confining all their views of commerce to the mere act of exchange, have obstinately repeated throughout their writings, in forms innume- rable, that commerce is only an excliange of equal value, for equal value. * If wealth, however, has been properly considered as consisting in the abundance of the objects of the desires of mankind ; if exchangeable value has been with pro- priety regarded merely as tlie means by which, in civilized society, mankind express their preference for the various productions of human industry, and thus regulate the channels in which it is embarked j com- merce cannot with consistency be stated as a direct means of producing, and, of course, it cannot be deemed a means of * See Dialogues sur le Commerce et sur les Travaux des Artisans, by Qviesnay, Printed in Phjsiocratie, S56 OF THE MEANS increasing wealth. It must, however, ap- pear, in a state practised in the various branches of labour, to be the great cause of putting the means of increasing wealth into action. It is from this circumstance that the wealth of a country, in these days when the commercial relations of nations extend themselves over the globe, no longer de- pends alone on the internal distribution of its wealth ; and that the progress of wealth is now accelerated or retarded, in propor- tion as the distribution of the growing wealth of rising countries, or changes in the distribution of wealth in societies that have been long established, give birth to a great or small demand for the com- modities in the production of which, in consequence of the internal arrangement of its own wealth, a country has been long practised. It is only necessary to view the nature of the British manufactures for which Ameri- ca furnishes a demand, to be convinced, that the encouragement to British industry? OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 357 afforded by demand from the United States, must have been comparatively small in- deed, had that country been universally cultivated by slaves, and parcelled out into estates productive of large incomes, such as our West India colonies exhibit. On the other hand, the advantages that French industry would have derived from such an arrangement of American property, are at once suggested, by resorting to the draw- ing-rooms, viewing the clothing, and con- sidering the expenditure, even of the Bri- tish West India planter. If, in the changes which have taken place in the distribution of European pro- perty, we had perceived (instead of a ten- dency to break down properties, and to emancipate from personal slavery, as well as from slavish tenures) a gradual accumu- lation of wealth into large masses, and a greater proportion of the lower orders re- duced into a state of perfect slavery ; the encouragement British industry would have derived from European demand must have been very different from what has been ex- 358 OF THE MEANS perienced, even under all the turbulent events that have distinguished modern times. This view of the circumstances on which the progressive wealth of European na- tions at present depends, must afford mat- ter of great consolation to every man who is seriously concerned for the prosperity and aggrandizement of the British Em- pire. For, if it could be allowed to enjoy peace and tranquillity, there never was a period in which the property of mankind seemed almost universally to be getting into an ar-. rangement that insured a similar extension of demand for the produce of the peculiar species of industry in which any one coun- try by practice excelled. And this flattering prospect, however much it may excite the envy of other Eu- ropean nations, cannot, with reason or with impunity, induce them to abstain from, or throw impediments in the way of, commercial communication with us. For, on the principles liere stated, it is OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 559 obvious, that commerce cannot exist be- twixt any two countries, without equally exciting the industry of both. No means can be devised of interchanging commodities that will exclusively encourage the indus- try of any one of the parties concerned ; and the foolish objections to commercial communication, that ignorant jealousy sug- gests, must ever retard the progress of the industry of a country that makes them, as efFectuaily as that of the country, against the increase of whose industry they are levelled. Great Britain cannot exclude the laces and cambrics of France, without obliging the consumers of those articles, through- out the British dominions, (in consequence of the necessary rise of price,) to appropri- ate more goods to the purchase of these commodities ; less must of course remain for the acquisition of other things in the liome market. Further, such a prohibition necessarily abstracts a demand, to tlie amount of the value of the lace and cam- bric, from those commodities, in the ma- 360 OF THE MEANS nufacture of which, practice has given Eng- land peculiar dexterity, which France must have desired in return ; for no de- gree of freedom in commercial commu- nication can ever convey goods from one country to another, without an equivalent. France, on the other hand, cannot ex- clude the hardware of Birmingham, or the cloth of Leeds, without making the natives of that country appropriate more commo- dities to the purchase of hardware and coarse cloth. This of necessity abstracts a portion of what would be employed in acquiring other objects of internal indus- try ; besides which, a demand to the a- mount of the value of the hardware and cloth must, by this means, be withdrawn from the acquisition of articles of Frencli growth and manufacture, which England would require in return. * * The clamour made in P' ranee against the Commercial Treaty in 1787i must have been excited by the industry of a few interested individuals ; for it is impossible that that coun-; try should not have derived equal benefit with England from the intercourse. OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. S6l Even the increase of price of any foreign commodity, occasioned by taxation, is just- ly regarded by the author of the Wealth of Nations as prejudicial to domestic in- dustry ; for he truly observes, that " the " dearer the Birmingham manufacturer " buys his foreign wine, the cheaper he The following extract, from the seventh Memoire of M. Boyetet, Director of Commerce in the years I787 and 1788, shows the amazing increase of demand for wines that took place immediately after the Treaty of Commerce. " Les etats qu'on a de la sortie des vins de Bourdeaux pour ** I'Angleterre et I'lrelande, dans les six premiers mois de " cette annee, portent deux mille sept cent cinquante tonneau.v '* de vin. " Ceux des six derniers mois de I'annce 1786, portent mille " cinq cent quatre-vingt-trois tonneaux. " II en resiilteroit une augmentation de sortie dans les six '* premiers mois de cette annee, de mille cent soixante sept " tonneaux de vin de Bourdeaux." '• The account of wines exported from Bourdeaux to Eng- " land and Ireland, in the first six months of this year, states " it to amount to two thousand seven hundred and fifty hogs- " heads. " In the last six months of the year 1786, there appear " to have been only one thousand five hundred and cighty- ** three hogsheads exported. «' It follows, then, that in the first six months of this year, ** there has been an increased exportation to the amount of " one thousand one hundred and sixty-seven hogsheads of " claret," 362 OF THE MEANS " necessarily sells that part of his hardware, " with which, or, what comes to the same " thing, with the price of which he buys " it. That part of his hardware, therefore, ** becomes of less value to him, and he has ** less encouragement to make it. The " dearer consumers in any one country pay " for the surplus produce of another, the " cheaper they necessarily sell that part of ** their own surplus produce, with which, " or, what comes to the same thing, with " the price of which they buy it. That " part of their own surplus produce be- " comes of less value to them, and they " have less encouragement to increase its " quantity."* Impediments, therefore, to commercial communication, whether by prohibitions or taxation, must ever retard the growing opulence of mankind, as much by discou- raging the industry of the country whose folly occasions them, as by any effect they can have on the industry of the country * Wealth of Nations, Vol. II. p. 514, 4to edit. 7 OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. 36S they are meant to injure. The quibbling policy of commercial negotiators, who false- ly and ignorantly pride themselves on tak- ing advantage of each other, ought alone to create the contempt it merits ; for human ingenuity cannot contrive a means of con- ducting the commercial relations betwixt any two countries, that does not alike pro- mote the prosperity of both. If, in delineating the means and the causes of the progressive increase of wealth, we have been fortunate enough to impress conviction, it will follow ; — That man owes his wealth, or the accu- mulation of the objects of his desire, which he alone of all animals possesses, to the power of directing his labour to the increas- ing of the quantity, or the meliorating of the quality, of the productions of nature ; and to the power of supplanting and per- forming labour by capital ; — faculties pe- culiar to, and characteristic of, the human species : — That though land, labour, and capital, may be regarded as the sources of wealth, 364} OF THE MEANS the wealth of mankind is alone increased bj labour, whether performed by the hand of man or by capital, employed in increas- ing the quantity, and meliorating the qua- lity, of the productions of nature ; and by labour, whether manual or performed by capital, employed in giving form to, and adapting raw materials for consumption : — That the direction which labour in every country takes, and of course the channels of industry in which it excels, — nay, the extent to which the exertions of its in- dustry, and even its population, can be pushed, depend upon the distribution of its wealth :^ — That when once the peculiar character of the industry of a country is, by this means, fixed and decided, the progress of its opulence is accelerated or retarded in proportion as the distribution of wealth in otlier countries creates a demand for the articles, in the production of which it ex- cels. And, lastly : — That all impediments thrown in the way of commercial communication, obstruct 4 OF AUGMENTING WEALTH, &C. oG5 the increase of wealth, as mucli by discou- raging the industry of the country which gives rise to them, as by their effects on the industry of the country they are meant to injure. \PPENDIX. APPENDIX. No. I. (Page 48.) XL faut distinguer les hiens d'avec les riches^ ses. Ceux-lk ont une valeur usuelle, et n'oiit point de valeur v^nale. Celles ci ont une va- leur usuelle et une valeur venale. II ne suffit pas a une nation d'avoir des biens. II taut qu'elle tende a se procurer de grandes richcsses, pour subvenir par le commerce a tons les be- soins differens des membres dont elle est compo- see." — P hysiocratie, p. cxviij. No. II. (Page 110.) The system which regards commerceasthesole source of wealth, was long maintained by most A a 570 APPENDIX, NO. II. of the eminent men who treated on commercial subjects; as the following extracts (to which many others might be added) sufficiently show. " It is a general opinion, that the trade of England was never greater, and it may be true, that if it be so, yet it will not absolutely con- clude, that the kingdom doth increase in riches ; for the trade may be very abundant, and yet by consumption and importance of more than is exported, the stock may waste. " The balance would be a true solution of the question, if it could be rightly had : but by rea- son it must be made up by a medium of the books of rates, it will be very uncertain. " Therefore we must seek another rule that is more sensible, upon which we may all judge, and that may be by the plenty or scarcity of money ; for it is a true rule, if money increase, the kingdom doth gain by trade ; if it be scarce, it loseth.*' — Sir Thomas Roe's Speech in Parlia- ment, 1640. *' Those trades may be esteemed good, which consume our products and manufactures, upon which the value of our land and employment of the poor depends ; that increase our seamen and navigation, upon which our strength de- pends J that supply us with such commodities as APPENDIX, NO. ir. 371 we absolutely want for carrying on our trade^ or for our safety, or carry out more than they bring in, upon which the increase of riches depends. " On the contrary, those that import more than they export, or bring us in goods perfectly manufactured, or any sort of goods that hinder the expence of our own, or that carry our wool or other materials, to enable foreign nations to make manufactures, to be spent in the room of our own ; or bring in commodities that are not of necessary use, but tend to increase idleness and luxurious expences ; or are carried on by foreign bottoms, or factors or merchants that are foreigners, (not so advantageous as when carried on by our own ships and people ;) or trades car- ried on by the exportation of coin or buliioiu Such heads as these may serve as a touchstone for the examination of trades.**— ^A Discourse of Coin, Trade, and Paper Credit, p. 58. 1697. " Although a kingdom may be enriched by gifts received, or by purchase taken from some other nations, yet these are things uncertain, and of small coubideration when they happen. The ordinary means, therefore, to increase our wealth and treasure is by foreign trade, wherein we must ever observe this rule, to sell n)ore to strangers yearly than we consume of theirs ia 572 APPENDIX, NO. II. value. For suppose that when this kingdom is plentifully served with the cloth, lead, tin, iron, fish, and other native commodities, we do year- ly export the overplus to foreign countries, to the value of twenty two hundred thousand pounds ; by which means we are enabled be- yond the seas to buy and bring in foreign wares for our use and consumption, to the value of twenty hundred thousand pounds. By this or- der duly kept in our trading, we may rest as- sured, that the kingdom shall be enriched year- ly two hundred thousand pounds, which must be brought to us in so much treasure ; because that part of our stock which is not returned to us in wares, must necessarily be brought home in trea- sure.'* — England's Treasure by Foreign Trade, by Thomas Mun, p. 7. " That the greatness of this kingdom de-> pends upon foreign trade, is acknowledged, and therefore the interest of trade not unbecoming persons of the highest rank ; and of this study, as well as others, it may be said, there is an in- finity in it J none, though of the largest intel- lects and experience, being able to fathom its utmost depth. " Among other things relating to trade, there has been much discourse of the balance of trade ; APPENDIX, NO. II. 373 the right understanding whereof may be of sin- gular use, and serve as a compass to steer by, in. the contemplation and propagation of trade for public advantage. *' The balance of trade is commonly under- stood two ways : '' I. Generally,— something whereby it may be known whether this kingdom gains or loses by foreign trade. " 2. Particularly, — something whereby we may know by what trades this kingdom gains, and by what trades it loses. *' For the first of these : " It is the most general received opinion, and that not ill-grounded, that this balance is to be taken by a strict scrutiny of what proportion the value of the commodities exported out of this kingdom bear to those imported; and if the ex- ports exceed the imports, it is concluded the na- tion gets by the general course of its trade ; it being supposed that the overplus is imported in bullion, and so adds to the treasure of the king- dom, gold and silver being taken for the measure and standard of riches." — A Discourse of Trade, by Sir Josiah Child, p. 163 and l64. " If we export any value of our manufactures for the consumption of a foreign nation, and im- 574* APPENDIX, NO. II. port thence no goods at all for our own con- sumption, it is certain the whole price of our own manufactures exported must be paid to us in money, and that all the money paid to us is our clear gain. " The merchant, perhaps, does not get QO per cent, by the goods he sends abroad ; yet if he sells his goods for the very price he paid for them, and brings back the whole price in money, and not in goods, to his native country, the merchant, in this case, gets nothing, but his country gets clear the whole value of the goods." — The British Merchant, p. 23. *' If we have at any timeimported from France (for our own consumption) a greater value of goods and merchandises than we exported for the consumption of that country, it is certain, that, one way or other, we paid the balance in money ; and whether we paid this by exporting bullion out of England, or by drawing bullion from other nations indebted to us, into France, the case is the very same; that whole balance was so much loss to this kingdom ; so much we may be said to have lost by our French com- merce." — The British Merchant, p. 54. APPENDIX, NO. in. 375 No, III. (Page 193.) ** Nous entendons par papiers de credit, toute crSance, ou obligation ; en un mot, toute stipula- tion par ^crit entre un debiteur et un creancier ou porteur de creance, qui oblige celui-la ^ payer, et autorise celui-ci a exiger une valeur, et qui pouvant etre cedee et transport^e, devient un moyen de transporter la propriete, de ces valeurs, d'un possesseur a un autre possesseur, sans transporter les valeurs en nature. " On voit que cette definition convienta toua les papiers, billets, actio^ s des banques ; aux creances qui representent des valeurs emprun- tees par les gouvernemens, ou des fonds d'entre- prises de commerce, de finance, &c. et enfin, aux creances m^mes de particulier aparticulier ; telles que les lettres de change, promessesj bill^U^ a ordrCf* &c, 376 APPENDIX, NO. IV. No. IV. (Page 236.) COMPUTATION OF INCOME BY MR PITT. Deduction for part under L. 60, ; which will pay J \nnual Income, i iothing,and part Taxable Income.| \ mder L. 200, 1 »rhich will pay m average _i_. i.andlorHs' rents, L. L. L. 40,000,000 culti- vated acres, esti- mated at 12s. 6d. per itcre, - - ' 23,000,000 J 5,000,000 20,000,000 Tenants' rents at fths, 19,000,000 1 13,000,000 6,000,000 Tithes, 5,000,000 i 1,000,000 4,000,000 Mines, navigation, and timber, 3,000,000 3,000,000 llouj-es. 6 000,000 j- 1,000,000 5,000,000 Rents on inhabited houses 4,500,000 Professions, 2,000,000 2,000,000 Scotland ith of Eng- land, 5,000,000 5,000,000 Income from jirofes- sions beyond sed. 5,000,000 5,000,000 [nterest on funds after deducting sums issued to Commissioners as sinking tund, find interest of capital redeemed, 15,000,000 i 3,000,000 12,000,000 Profit on foreign trade, supposed 15 per centum on| L.80,000 GOOca. pita! insured. 12,000,000 12,000,000 Ditto, home trade at » 5 per cent. 18, 000, 000") 10.000 000 J 28,000,000 Other trade, 102.000.000 APPENDIX, NO. V. 377 No. V. (Page 240.) The Testament of M. Fortune Bicard, Sfc. tranS' lated from the French by Dr Price. *' In the name of God, I Fortune Ricard, teacher of arithmetic at D , invoking the Holy Virgin, and St. Fortune my patron, do make this my last will as follows :— [" The executors, wlio have caused this will *' to be printed, in order to fulfil the intentions " of the late M. Fortune Ricard, do not think ** it necessary to publish those particular be- *' quests which concern only his own family. " After having disposed of his patrimony a- " mong them with wisdom, he proceeds in the *' following manner:"] — " It remains for me now to declare my inten- tions with regard to the promise of 500 livres, (L. 22, 4s. 6:\,) subscribed on my behalf by M, P., banker of this town. 1 his sum proceeded, originally from a present which was made me by Prosper Ricard, my much- honoured grand- father, when I entered the eighth year of my age. At ihat age he had taught me the princi- 578 APPENDIX, NO. V. pies of writing and calculation. After having shown me, that a capital, with its accumulating interest at 5 per cent., would amount, at the end of one hundred years, to more than one hundred and thirty- one times the original sum ; and, see- ing that I listened to this lecture with the great* est attention, he look 24 livres out of his pocket, and addressed me with an enthusiasm which is still present to my mind. " My child," said he, *' remember, while thou livest, that, with eco- " nomy and calculation, nothing is impossible " for man. Here are 24 livres, which I give *' thee. Take them to a merchant in our neigh- " bourhood, who will place them in trade out of " regard to me. Every year thou shall add ihe " interest to the principal. At thy death, thou " shall employ the produce in good works for *' the repose of thy soul and my own." I have executed this order with fidelity ; and, in the course of my life, I have planned many projects for emplo)'iiig this money. Having reached the seventy-firsl year of my age, it amounts to 500 livres ; but, as I must, some lime or other, set bounds to myself, I now desire that it may be divided into five portions, of 100 livres each, to which the interests shall be annually added. APPENDIX, NO. V. 579 and the accumulated sums shall be successively applied to the following uses : — " 1. In a hundred years, the first sum of 100 livres will amount to more than 13,100 livres, (L. 58^22.) From this sum, a prize of 4000 livres shall be given for the best theological disserta- tion, to prove the lawfulness of putting out mo- ney to interest. Three medals, of 600 livres each, shall also be given for the three disserta- tions which shall be adjudged the next in merit to the prize dissertation. The remainder of the 13,100 livres shall be expended in printing the prize dissertation, and extracts from the others. Copies of these shall be sent, gratis, to all the bishops, clergy, and confessors of the kingdom. I had intended to have sent them also into fo- reign countries ; but I observe that all the uni- versities of the Christian vi'orld, excepting those of France, have solemnly recognised the lawful- ness of putting money to interest, and that it continues necessary only in this kingdom, to explain a question in morals, so interesting to the welfare of the state. " 2. After two hundred years, a second sum of 100 livres, amounting, with its accumulated in- terest, to more than 1700,000 livres, (L, 756,500,) 580 APPENDIX, NO. V. shall be employed in establishing a perpetual fund, for fourscore prizes, of 1000 livres each, to be distributed annually by the different aca- demies of the kingdom, as follows: Fifteen prizes for the most distinguished virtuous actions ; fif- teen for works of science and literature ; ten for solutions of questions in arithmetic and calcula- tion ; ten for such new processes in agriculture as shall produce the best crops ; ten for master- pieces in the fine arts ; and ten to encourage races and other exercises, proper to display the force and agility of the body, and to restore amongst us a taste for the gymnasium, which was in such great esteem among the Greeks, and -which formerly made so many heroes. " 3. After three hundred years, from another sum of 100 livres, increased in that time to more than two hundred and twenty-six millions, (L. 10,057,000,) there shall be appropriated 196 millions, towards estabhshing, in the most considerable places in France, five hundred pa- triotic banks, for lending money without inte- rest ; the largest of which shall have a fund of ten millions of livres, and the smallest a fund of 100,000 livres. These banks shall be managed by a committee of the most upright citizens in each place, and the money shall be employed APPENDIX, NO. V. 581 in loans, to succour the unfortunate, or advanced towards promoting agriculture, trade, and indus- try. The remaining thirty millions shall be ex- pended in founding twelve museums, in the ci- ties of Paris, Lyons, Rouen, Bourdeaux, Rennes, Lisle, Nancy, Tours, Dijon, Thoulouse, Aix^ and Grenoble. Each of these museums shall be pla- ced at the most agreeable end of the city. Five hundred thousand livres shall be expended upon each building, and in the purchase of grounds which shall belong to them, and be laid out into botanical and fruit gardens, and also into kit- chen gardens, and extensive walks. To each museum shall be annexed an income of 100,000 livres ; and there shall be lodged and boarded in it forty literary men, and artists of superior me- rit, who, at the time of meals, shall be divided into four tables, that their repasts may be cheer- ful, without being too noisy. Each museum shall be provided with six secretaries, a de- signer and engraver, and four carriages. There shall be also a hall for concerts, a theatre, a che- mical laboratory, a cabinet of natural history, a hall for experimental philosophy, and a grand gallery for a common library. A hundred thou- sand livres shall be expended on a separate libra- ry for each of these establishments. The same APPENDIX, NO. V. sum shall be employed in providing them with separate cabinets of natural history, and with philosophical instruments. And 10,000 livres shall be reserved annually, for keeping up and increasing these cabinets and philosophical in- struments. " The libraries shall always be open to the public. Twenty members of the museum shall be engaged in giving public and gratuitous courses of lectures upon the foreign languages, and upon all the arts and sciences. The other twenty shall be engaged in such other employ- ments as may be most useful. No one shall be admitted a member, till he has previously given proof, not of his rank, descent, or nobility, but of his morals, and of his never having dishonour- ed his pen, by writing against religion and go- vernment, or by sacrificing any member of the community. On being admitted, he shall make oath, " That he will prefer virtue, truth, and *' his country, to every thing; and the general *' good of literature to his own fame." The works of the members of the museum shall be printed at the expence of the establishment, and when those expences are reimbursed, the profits shall belong to the authors. " 4. After four hundred years, the fourth sum 12 APPENDIX, WO. V. of 100 livres, amounting, with interest, to near 30,000 millions, (L. 1,330,000,000,) shall be em- ployed in building one hundred towns, each con- taining one hundred and fifty thousand souls, in the most agreeable situations which can be found in France. The means of peopling these towns, of governing and making them flourish, are explained in a memorial annexed to this will. In a short time there will result from hence an addition of fifteen millions of inhabi- tants to the kingdom, and its consumption will be doubled ; for which service I hope the eco- nomists will think themselves obliged to me. '* I am sensible that all the specie in Europe is not equal to these 30,000 millions, and that it ■will be impossible to make provision in money for such immense sums. For this reason, I leave it to the discretion of my executors to exchange cash at convenient seasons for landed and other real possessions. The revenue arising from those possessions shall either be laid out in cash, or re- alized by further purchases, so that my bequests may be fulfilled in their due time without any difficulty. *' I am convinced, by the most accurate cal- culations, that my arrangements, instead of clog- ging, will give activity to the circulation of spe-; 384 APPENDIX, NO. V. cie. Laying out the money T have ordered in the purchase of estates, will soon increase their value; and when ihese accu.nulaling riches shall have so produced their effects as that there can no longer be found in Frasice a landholder who will sell his estate, purchasers must be sought for among the neighbouring nations. *' 5, Finally, with regard to the last sum of 100 livres, amounting nearly, by the accumula- tion of five hundred years, tj four millions of millions of livres, (one hundred and seventy-six thousands of millions Sterling,) it shall be dis- posed of as folio vv^s : *' Six thousand millions shall be appropriated towards paying the national debt of France, up- on condition that the Kings, our good Lords and Masters, shall be entreated to order the Comp- trollers General of the Finances to undergo in future an examination in arithmetic before they enter upon their office. *' Twelve thousand millions shall likewise be employed in paying the public debts of England. It may be seen, that I reckon that both those na- tional debts will be doubled in this period ; not that 1 have any doubts of the talents of certain ministers to increase them much more; but their operations in this way are opposed by an infini- APPENDIX, NO. V. 385 ty of circumstances, which lead me to presume, that those debts cannot be more than doubled. Besides, if they amount to a few thousands of miUions more, I declare that it is my intention that they should be entirely paid off, and that a project so laudable should not remain unexecut- ed for a trifle more or less. I beg that the Eng- lish would not refuse this slight mark of the re- membrance of a man, who was indeed born a Frenchman, but who sincerely esteemed their nation, and always was a particular admirer of that magnificent work which Newton, their countryman, has entitled Universal Arithmetic. I earnestly desire, that, as an acknowledgment for this legacy, the English nation will consent to call the French their neighbours^ and not their natural enemies ; that they may be assured that nature never made man an enemy to man, and that national hatreds, commercial prohibitions, and, above all, wars, cimstanlly produce a mon- strous error in calculations. But I dare not in this instance require anything. We must hope for all we desire from Time ; and when we have the happiness of rendering a service, we must not destroy its value, by annexing conditions to it which may encumber those whom we wish to serve. Bb 586 APPENDIX, NO. V. * " Thirty thousand millions shall be formed into a fund, for producing an annual revenue of fifteen hundred millions, to be divided in limes of peace among all the pov^^ers of Europe. In time of war, the share of the aggressor or aggres- sors shall be given to those who have been at- tacked unjustly, in order to engage sovereigns, if possible, to reflect a little before they com- mence unjust hostilities. This revenue shall be distributed among the different nations in pro- portion to their population. Every ten years an exact numeration shall be taken, with a view to this distribution, which shall be made by a diet composed of deputies from all the different na- tions; but I direct that a larger proportion shall be distributed to those sovereigns who shall ap- ply for it, and appear to desire it, with no other view than to encourage population among their subjects. '* 1 leave to the wisdom of my executors the care of extending the benefits of this bequest to the other parts of the world ; and if, by this means, they should hope to succeed in extin- guishing, throughout the world, the absurd and barbarous rage of war, I willingly consent that ihey appropriate for this purpose the further sum of one hundred thousand millions. I wish APPENDIX, NO. V. 387 that six thousand millions may be offered to. his Majesty the King of France ; namely, a thousand millions to supersede the necessity of lotteries, a sort of tax imposed upon wicked men, which infallibly renders them a great deal more wicked ; a thousand miMions to buy in all useless offices, which are attended with the sad inconvenience of persuading many persons that it is a sufficient discharge of their duty to their country to occupy an office without function, and that an honour may be derived from bear-, ing a senseless title; a thousand millions to buy in offices, which, on the contrary, are too im- portant to be left exposed to the danger of ve- nality ; a thousand millions to purchase a do- main for his Majesty, worthy of his crown, and sufficient for the expences of his Court, so that the nation may clearly perceive, that the taxes imposed upon them are applicable only to the expenditures of the State. The remaining two thousand millions shall form a fund, whose an- nual produce shall be employed by his Majesty in pensions and gratuities. By these means, if, sometimes, those favours should be conferred up- on intriguing and undeserving persons, the na- tion will have no cause to complain of the im» 388 APPENDIX, NO. V. proper use of money, drawn from taxes and the labours of the husbandman. *' I appoint a thousand milHons towards add- ing a thousand livres to the settled income of all the clergy in the kingdom, and six hundred livres to that of their vicars, upon condition that they no longer demand fees for saying mas- ses. I had also some thoughts of proposing to them the suppression of fees for baptisms, mar- riages, and burials ; but I have considered those functions to be of a civil as well as religious na- ture, and that, on this account, the clergy may, without impropriety, be allowed to receive a pay, which is, in fact, more moderate than would be required by any other public officers in their places. Besides, this pay perhaps ren- ders the service more exact, more speedy on their part, and less irksome to the delicacy of some of those who receive it. *' I appoint two thousand millions towards forming an income of ten livres a month to all the children which shall be born in the king- dom, till they are three years of age ; and I de- sire this legacy to be increased to thirty livres a month to those children who shall be nursed by their own mothers. I do not except even the children of the rich ; on the contrary, I invite APPENDIX, NO. V. • 389 rich parents to accept this donation without re- luctance, as an honorary prize awarded to pa- ternity and the cares of maternal love. They may, if they please, apply it to acts of charity and benevolence. " I appoint four thousand millions towards purchasing the waste lands of the kingdom. These shall be divided into five hundred thou- sand little farms or tenements, of four or five acres each, on which shall be erected as many commodious cottages. These five hundred thou- sand farms shall be given as freeholds to an equal number of married peasants, chosen in each pa- rish by a vestry composed of ten of the most aged inhabitants. The possessors of these free- holds shall be obliged to make them their only residence, to cultivate them with their own hands and those of their families, and to report every year the improvements of them which they have made. These freeholds shall be he- reditary, but only upon condition that they shall neither be divided, nor any two of them engross- ed by one person. When a freeholder dies, without leaving behind him either wife, chil- dren, brothers, sisters, nephews, or nieces, who have lived and laboured with him for three years prior to his decease, the freehold shall be 390 APPENDIX, NO. V. declared vacant, and given anew, by the vestry of the parish, to that peasant who shall appear to deserve it best. " I desire that two thousand millions be laid out in purchasing all the manors of which there shall be sellers, and that the vassals thereon be for ever afterwards exempted from all servitude and fealty. " Six thousand millions shall be employed in founding houses of education in all the country parishes, agreeable to the plan of the author of a work, entitled Patriotic Views respecting the Education of the People. If, in executing this plan of a man of genius, and an excellent citi- zen, it should appear to want some little amend- ments and alterations, I direct that they shall be adopted. " I appoint twenty thousand millions towards erecting in the kingdom forty thousand houses of labour, or public workliouses; to each of which shall be appropriated from ten thousand to fifty thousand livres annual income. Every man and woman shall have a right to offer themselves at any time to be maintained and employed in them. I choose to say nothing of any other par- ticulars in the government and management of these houses, hoping that the ideas which begin APPENDIX, NO. V. 391 to be formed concerning establishments of this kind, will be perfected before the period fixed for these shall arrive; and that it will at length be universally acknowledged, that though it is dangerous and foolish to give alms in money to a strong beggar, yet that society has no right to deprive him of his liberty, and inflict punish- ments upon him, while it does not hold out to him any other means of subsistence, or at least point out to him a method of discovering what means he is capable of using. " I entreat the managers of these public work- houses to give the greatest encouragement to such trades as can be performed by women. This sex, so dear to all sensible minds, has been neglected or oppressed by all our institutions. Seductions of all kinds seem to conspire against their virtue. Necessity precipitates them invo- luntarily into an abyss of infamy and misery. The low price which is set upon the labour of women is out of all proportion to the inferiori- ty of their bodily strength. Let the public work-houses set the example of paying them "better. *' There are in France many houses of correc- tion, where the misconduct of women is severe- ly punished, but where, in reality, it is only sus- 392 APPENDIX, NO. V. pended, mere confinement having no tendency to eradicate vice. Why should there not be one establishment, where a young woman, conquer- ed by temptation, and on the brink of despair, might present herself, and say, " Vice offers me " gold J I only ask for labour and bread. In com- " passion to my remorse, assist and strengthen " me. Open an asylum for me, where I may " weep without being seen, expiate those faults " which pursue and overwhelm me, and recover " a shadow of peace." Such an institution ex- ists no where. I appoint, therefore, a thousand millions towards establishing one. " The snares which are laid by vice for wo- men without fortunes, would make fewer vic- tims if more assistance was given them. We have an infinity of establishments for persons in the higher ranks, of life, which do honour to the generosity of our forefathers. Why have we none for this purpose? I desire, therefore, that two thousand millions be employed in establishing in the kingdom a hundred hospitals, which shall be called Hospitals of Angels. There shall be ad- mitted into each a hundred females, of the age of seven or eight years, and of the most enga- ging forms. They shall receive the most per- fect education in regard to morals, useful know- APPENDIX, NO. V. 393 ledge, and agreeable accomplishments. At the age of eighteen they may quit the hospital, in order to be married, at which period they shall each be paid a portion of forty thousand livres. I mention this moderate sum, because it is my wish that they be neither reproached for want of fortune, nor espoused from interest. An an- nual income of two thousand livres shall be given also to their parents, * * * *. Except once in the year, at a solemn and splendid procession, they shall rarely appear in public, but shall be constantly employed in their asylum, in learning all that can render them one day excellent wives and mothers. *' In order to fit them, in particular, for do- mestic economy, I desire, that after they have been taught the most accurate ideas of expences of all kinds, questions be proposed to them from time to time, to which they shall be obliged to give answers by word of mouth, and also in writ- ing J as for example : " If you had such and " such an income, under such and such circum- " stances, how much would you appropriate to " your table, yourhouse-rent, your maintenance, " and the education of your children ? How *' many servants would you keep ? How much " would you reserve for sickness and unforeseen 394 APPENDIX, NO. V. ** expences ? How much would you consecrate " to the relief of the unfortunate, and the public " good ? If your income depended either en- " tirely or in part upon a transient advantage, " or a place which was not assured to you, How ** much would you expend annually ? What *' sum would you reserve for forming a capital?" &c. &c. Prizes publicly given to the best an- swers to questions of this kind would constitute, in my opinion, an exercise equally engaging, and more useful, than the little comedies and novels with which young persons in the higher stations are generally entertained, " The honours conferred upon great men have always appeared to me the most effectual means of producing great men, I appoint, therefore, a thousand millions towards striking medals, and placing in the halls of all towns, or in any other convenient places, statues and busts in honour of such great men as shall hereafter rise up. I de- sire further, that these honours be not paid them till ten years after their decease, and that they be decreed and proportioned by a tribunal, com- posed of such upright, enlightened, and worthy citizens, as shall be most likely not to be dazzled by lalse virtues. It has been once reckoned, that founding hospitals for the sick is one of the APPENDIX, NO. V. S95 best public services. For some years, a convic- tion has been gaining ground, that breathing the pestilential air of hospitals doubles the danger of diseases, and that on this, and other accounts, they probably destroy more lives than they save. I desire, therefore, that ten thousand millions be employed in establishing, in each parish of the kingdom, houses of health, in which shall be maintained a physician, a surgeon, and a conve- nient number of sisters of charity, and nurses. These houses shall supply the sick gratis, in their own houses, with every assistance in food and medicine, and none shall be taken to the house of healtii excepting those whom it shall be im- possible to assist at home. *' I have hitherto only directed the employ- ment of about two hundred thousand millions. There remain still near four millions of millions, the appropriation of which I leave to the discre- tion of my executors. I wish them to purchase and pull down all such houses as incommode the public way in all towns ; to multiply squares, quays, fountains, gardens, &c. in order to give salubrity to the air of towns ; to empty ponds, to clear heaths ; to deepen the beds of rivers, so as to render them navigable, and to unite them by means of canals. In a word, I wish them to 396 APPENDIX, NO. V. co-operate in every possible method with nature, which seems to have designed France to be the most delightful country under heaven. *' I hope that all good citizens will assist my executors in the choice of such useful establish- ments as shall yet remain to be formed. I call upon them to publish the ideas with which pa- triotic zeal may inspire them, since now they are encouraged by the consoling certainty, that funds for executing them cannot be wanting. *' I name for executors my dearest and best friends MM. , (Here the testator names six executors, who do not think proper at present to reveal themselves, and then goes on as follows :) " I beg of them to meet as often as the affairs of my executorship shall require. In case of an equal division of opinions, the oldest shall have the casting vote. When one of them dies, I de- sire the survivors to fill the vacancy, as soon as may be, with the most honest, zealous, and dis- interested citizen of their acquaintance, and to proceed in this manner for ever. I hope that during the first years of their executorship, when the operations of the fund will be easy, they will transact in this business out of regard to me and to the public. I foresee, that, in process of time, 6 APPENDIX, NO. V. 397 the sums to be laid out will become so immense- ly great, as to render necessary voyages and other considerable expences, which will be pro- ductive of no profit. For this reason, I have left one hundred and twenty-five thousand livres of the second sum unappropriated ; of the third, seven hundred and eleven thousand ; and of the fourth, thirty-two millions. These sums I re- quest them to accept, as a compensation for their expences and trouble. I charge them always, as far as they can, without hazarding the secu- rity of the fund, to prefer those ways of laying out the accumulating sums which shall be most serviceable to individuals and the public. " If a reduction in the rate of interest, or any unforeseen losses, should injure the fund, so as to retard its increase, the execution of my desires need only be postponed, in proportion to the in- terruption that shall happen. ** May the success of these establishments cause one day a few tears to be shed on my grave ! But, above all, may the example of an obscure individual kindle the emulation of pa- triots, princes, and public bodies ; and engage them to give attention to this new, but power- ful and infallible means, of serving posterity. 598 APPENDIX, NO. V. and contributing to the future improvement and happiness of the world V* Bemark by the Translator. It is to be observed, that if M. Ricard had directed the interest of the money to be laid out every three months, it would have wonderfully increased the suras with the disposal of which his executors are entrusted. One hundred Jivres will amount, if impro- ved at 5 per cent, interest. Paid yearly. Half-yeariy. Livres. Livres. In 100 years, to 131,501 139,560 In 500 years, to 3,932,400.000,000 5,29^,100,000,000 Paid quarterly. In 100 years, to I'iSjSpO livres. la 500 years, to 6,166,000,000,000 livres. If, therefore, the last 100 livres had been improved at 5 per cent, quarterly interest, his executors would have had an additional sum of 2,234,000,000,000 livres, (nearly equal to a hundred thousand millions Sterling,) which is a sum more than sufficient to encompass the 7 APPENDIX, NO. VI. 399 earth with a belt of guineas, all close, and five feet broad. No. VI. (Page 264.) Extract of the Preamble to Cap. LXXI. of the 4'2d of the King. .. " Whereas the public burdens may at this period be greatly alleviated, and the reduction of the national debt at the same time accelerat- ed, by consolidating the public debt, and the whole of the said debt will thereby be redeemed within forty -Jive years** Clause V. of the said Act. " And be it further enacted, That all monies whatever which shall be placed from time to time to the account of the said Commissioners, by virtue of either of the said recited acts, (ex- cept so far as the same are hereby repealed,) or by virtue of this act, shall, and are hereby appro- priated to, and shall accumulate in manner di- rected by the said acts, for the reduction of the national debt of Great Britain, and shall be from time to time applied by the said Commissioners^ 400 APPENDIX, NO. VI. pursuant to the directions, and under and ac- cording to the restrictions and provisions of the said recited acts, either in payment for the re- demption, or in the purchase of the several re- deemable public annuities of Great Britain, un- til the whole of the perpetual redeemable annui- ties, now charged upon the public funds of Great Britain, including such charge as has ari- sen, or may arise, on any loan made in Great Bri- tain, before the passing of this act, and also such charge as shall arise by any annuities, interests, and dividends, payable in consequence of any loans made chargeable on the consolidated fund, by an act passed in this session of Parliament, entituled, A?i Act for repealing the Duties on In- come ; for the effectual Collection of Arrears of the said Duties, and accounting for the same, and for charging the annuities specifically char- ged thereon upon the Consolidated Fund of Great Britain^ shall have been completely redeemed or purchased, so as that the whole of the seve- ral redeemable public annuities now charged upon the public funds of Great Britain, includ- ing such respective charges as aforesaid, shall be paid off within forty-five years from the re- spective periods of the creation of such respective charges and public annuities as aforesaid," APPENDIX, NO. VII. 401 No. VII. (Page ^265.) State MKNT, showing the Sum that must of neces- sity be abstracted from Expenditure, and con- verted into capital, every half-year, by an an- nual Income of L. 5,585,572, accumulated half-yearly, at 3 per cent, for forty-five years. Years. 2,792,786. 2,834,677.79 1 5,627,46^79 2,877> 197956 H 8,504,^61. 746 2,920,355.926 2 11,425,017.672 2,964,161.265 H 14-,389,17S.->->a7 2,008,6 ^.'3.684 3 3.053,753.039 Si 20,451,005.66 :3,099,5J9.334 4 23,551,114.994 c 23,551,114994 3,146,05^.724 4J 26,697,167.718 3,193,243,515 5 29,890,411.233 3,241,142 168 5i 33,131,553.401 3,289,759 301 36,421,312.702 3,339,105.690 H 39,760,418.392 3,389,192.275 43,149,610.667 3,440,030.160 7i 46,589,640.827 c c 402 Years. APPENDIX, NO, VII. H 9 9- 10 loi 11 Hi 12 \^ 13 l^ 46,589,640.827 3,491,630.612 50,081,271.459 3,544,005 071 53,625,276.510 3,697,166.147 57,222,441.657 3,651,122.624 60,873,564.281 3,705,889.464 64,579,453.745 3,761,477.806 68,340,931.551 3,817,899.973 72,158,831.524 3,875,168.472 70,033,999996 3,933,295.999 79,967,295.995 3.99^^,290.439 83,959,591.434 4,052,179.871 88,011,771.305 4,1 12,962.569 92,124,733.874 4,174,657 008 14 96,299,390.882 Years. 96,299,390.882 4,237,276.863 14^ 100,536,667.745 4,300,836.016 15 104,837,501.761 4,365,348.526 15J- 109,202,850.287 4,430,828.754 16 113,633,679.041 4,497,291.185 16^ 118,130,970.226 4,564,750.553 17 122,695,720.779 4;633,22 1.811 17i 127,328,942.590 4,702,720.138 18 13^,031,662.728 4,773,260.940 18i 136,804,923.668 4,844,859.855 19 141,649,783.523 4,917,532.752 \% 146,567,316.275 4,991,295.744 20 151,558,612.019 5,066,165.180 20^ 156,624,777.199 Years. APPENDIX, NO. VII. Years. 403 156,624,777.199 5,142,157.657 21 161,766,934.856 5,219,290.022 21i 166,986,224.878 5,2p/,579.S73 22 172,283,804.951 5,377,043 063 22^ 177,660,847.314 5,457,698.709 23 183,118,546.023 5,539,564.190 23i 18b,6i8,ll0.2l3 5,622,657.653 24 194,280,767.866 5,706,997.517 24|- 199,987,765.383 5,792,602.480 25 205,780,367.863 5,879,491.517 25^ 211,659,859 380 5,967,683.890 26 217,627,543.270 6,057,199.149 26i 223,684,742.419 6,148,057.136 27 229,832,799.555 229,832,799.555 6,240,277.993 27|- 236,073,077.548 6,333,882.163 28 242,406,959. ni 6,428,890.395 28j 248,835,850.106 6,^25,323.751 29 255,361,173.857 6,623,203.607 29i 261.984,377.464 6,722,551.661 30 268,706,929.125 6,823,389.936 30i 275,530,3 19.061 6,925,740.785 31 28^,456,059.846 7,029,626.897 31i 2S9,485,6y6.743 7,135,071.301 32 296,620,758.044 7,242,097370 3^ 303,862,8^5.414 7,-350,728.83 1 33 311,213,584.245 7,460,989.763 33i 318,674,574.008 404 Years. APPENDIX, NO. VII. Years. 318,674,574.008 7,57^2,904.610 34 326,^247,478 618 7,686,498.179 S4J 333.933,976 797 7,801,795.651 35 341,735,772.448 7,91»,822 586 35^ 349 654,595.034 8,037,604.925 36 357,692,199.959 8,15^,168.999 36J 365,850,368.958 8,280,541.534 37 374,;30,910 492 8,404,749.657 37J- 382,535,660.149 8,5.30,820.902 38 39 l,06i),48 1.051 8,658,783.215 S8J. 399,725,264.266 8,788,664.963 39 4( *8,5 13,929.^29 8,^/20,494.938 417,434,424.167 9,054,302.362 40 426,488,726.529 9,190,116897 40J 435,678,843.426 5,327,968.651 41 445,006,812.077 9,467,888.181 41i 454,474,700.258 9,609,906.503 42 464,084,606.76 1 9,754,055.101 42J- 473,838,661.862 9,900,365.927 43 483,739,027.789 10,048,871.416 43i 493,787,899.205 10,199,604.488 44 503,987,503.693 10,352,598.555 39i 417,434,4^24.167 * In Appendix. No. VIII. the 44|- 514,340.102.248 10,507,887.533 45 *524,847,989.781 annual sum of L, 5,585,572 APPENDIX, NO. VIII. 405 No. VIII. (Page ^6Q,) Thk following is the Statement of the Re- demption of the National Debt, presented to the House of Commons, 7th April 1802. Amount of Stock purchased in forty-five and forty-six years, at the several rates of Interest 3, 3^, 3^, 3|, and 4? per cent, by a Sinking Fund of L. 5,585,572 per annum. In 45 years. In 46 years. At par, the consolidated sinking fund purchases, Consolidated debt, 7th April 1802, £ 528,395,000 488,987,666 £ 550,059,000 488,987,656 Surplus, ... 39,407.344 61,071,344 At 3j per cent, is purchased, Consolidated debt, 7th April 1802, 612,737,000 488,987 656 639,020,000 488,987,656 Surplus, - . - 123,749 844 150,032 344 per annum, is stated as amounting in forty-five years, when accumulating at 3 per cent., to L. 528,395,000, This differ- ence is supposed to arise from the calculation delivered into the House of Commons, proceeding on the supposition of a quarterly accumulation. 406 APPENDIX, NO. VIII. In 45 years. In 46 years. At 3^ per cent, is purchased, Consolidated debt, 7th April 1 802, £. £. 707-220,000 738,720,000 488.987.656488,987-656 Surplus, 2 1 8,232,344249,732,344 At 3f pt r cint. IS purchastci. Consolidated debt, 7th April 1802, 812,395,000 488,987,656 850,370,000 488,987,656 Surplus, 323,407,344 361,382,344 At 4 per cent, is purchased, Consolidated debt, 7th April 1 802, 930,096,000 488,987,656 975,430,000 488,987,656 Surplus, .... 441.108,344 486,442,344 APPENDIX, NO. X. k&f No. X. (Page 278.) Er/ 3 iy i 7iSTCtiv [movov mxa ruv d^rifMivuv iuf^euvn rd vi/ivo/isva rragd jSatf/Xsw;, dXXd tw ovri )y ridovfj -xoXu 6ia(ps^ei rd ^ rrs ^aaiX;us TQ^TTi^r^i. Kai tSto /mivtoi ourug aj^an ovSsv ri ^sw/tiaffov* wffTEo yb ly ah'k'u Ti-^vsu .a/gt^sooirw? h rtug fiiydXaig t5tov )^ aexsa, hir\vayxd(5^at riro rrotm. Th auro 3 rSro <7s-rov^i ly rd df/!,(pi rjjv diaiTav . w /xt'i' ydg 6 auroj xXhriv g^unuQi, r^din^at xogfi,et, (idrlet, o-v|/a aXXors aXXoTa To/af, avayxjj, oTfj,au, riruj ug av sxa?oy Tgop^wg^, isrwg s'^^f 'J'^a 3 'xai/ov e'^yoi/ sv/ t-<^etv x^eu, aXXu) h'KTav, ciXXuj Jjs 'j^Sui/ 'i-^eiv, aXXw hirlav dXXcHcnli i;!l7|uJil itlT. unrclcomcfl Amount of contracted In each rcdeemeil In each mnedcemed UKHT. %Mt. DKBT. DEBT. Vciir. Vcar. DEBT. (vTi. rZi- Co. 3. Co. <. I.o. S. Co. 15. To. 7. '■',. H. \monnt »t 1st Aiiinisl - J786 f «38,-.'.-|,^4S £ 838,831,218 Setvrceu Ut Aug. 1786 and Jsl Feb. 17S7 S3S,«Jl,-.;iS £ 668,730 V37,568,498 1788 S38,S3l,'.'l8 • 1,456,900 236,1 11,.598 1-Sil S38,V3I,»4B 1,506,350 834,60.'>,248 . . 1790 «38,S31,S48 ■ 1,558,850 833,016,398 1791 *38,t3l,SlS 1,587,500 83l,4.''.ll,898 17Pe •-'3.S.i3l,24S 1,507,100 829,951,798 179.! ^.-S,'.'-|,S48 1,968,650 887,989,148 17M ■.'44,4Sl,.>m £ fi,2.S".il00 «,174,I03 838,061,743 1795 Sr.0,1. '■7,773 JA,(;7f.,.i»5 8,804,945 844.936,323 1796 31I,Rr.S,47l M,70S.d98 3,0U3,.|.M 29a,r>r>S, 66 1797 36H,SO'.>,040 :^l\.9f.,M9 4,390,670 346,113,40.'. 1798 394,l39,o480 £ 2,925,000 £ 2,985,000 £15,404 £ 2,909,596 1799 429.7 S3,290 3j,l'.il,i.50 7,779,807 392,612,323 6,925,000 4,000,000 96,530 6,813,066 iSOll 45l.658,«y0 i.'l,875,,752 18,175,000 5,850,001) 130,185 11,932,881 1801 4S(l,7O3,i90 •J9,n45,000 10,881,776 413,038,977 15,315,000 3,140,000 233.360 14,839,521 180* 5Sf..647,(;03 .')'>.'.'i4,.1l.-| 9,98S,7S9 4S9.or.7..1.->I : 9,708,750 4,393,750 31. ',988 18,922,343 180S .iC7, shown, after dp. ',.(,. dncliu- Ibe 5 per c.Dts. 1797, ^ ' ^ jiaid oli in each Year. J 6-o,63e,ia3 89,880,900 14,085,017 533,075,343 41,718,000 3,380,000 807,393 37,996,659 1808 689,005,303 18,373.S00 14,678,717 536,776,026 ♦7,139,685 5,421,623 907,585 42,5 10,699 18i>9 70i,698,.S5C :3fi9.1,8>3 1 4,728,827 535,741,052 50,094,000 8,954,375 951.463 44,513,611 1810 72i,975.C78 ,t 11,107 16,106,263 545,062,698 61,874,250 7,580,851) 1,135,716 53,544^568 Inrlndet Loan IStI, raiwd for") Ir-land, cliargMble on Great JlSlJ BritdiD. \ 773,OJ!!,49C (.i)«9,w'4t,7ll 18,682,590 556,884,819 61,874,250 IndutlctliDGr. Britain 1,356,876 52,188,292 1813 818,775,527 40,743.011 •1,816,457 .575,811,398 08,930,850 7,656,000 1,567,541 58,276,751 1814 907.495,950 93,7«0,«3 24,763,646 644,168,169 79,1.30,850 10,800,000 1,798,434 66,678,317 l»l.^ 932,a81,«H(l V4,7Te Debt of Irdand is cxclnaive of L.1,900,900 Ifi»li 5 per c»Dl». The Snm« in cobinira 3 and 7 iiavc been ridccnied ami i payable in England. tnii^fcried a\ fullows : £ By Ihf Sinking l*'iind 328,274,369 • By S"tli G-o. III. e. 48. Ibe SinkinR Fund Arronnia Icrniinale nn Ibcilli Ijind 'I'ax 25,389,233 January in eaeh Year, initead of Ibe l»t Fi-biiiaiy as hcielofure. Lite AnniiilieA putcliiiM'd - 4,323,385 Stuck, the dividends due upon wbicli li.ivc ri- ) 288,037 A':l.>llln d Uitidciu d upwarda S liimns 3 and 7 L.360."2 1.010. fioni llie Kiinr.r inMli- /loiii Hi.j ortic- on lln- l.iili „f 1 , l„iiaiy lait in rurcbustd Willi ' 3ls,(;oo f The Slims in c I amount ti) coiiM q'liiicc of Ihe S per cent*. 1797, paid off, biiii^ included in lib 35S,-'.S',02I Account. per cciiln. 1797 p.tid off 2,3oS,4l7 < 'I'br diff.renec aii.«es from 1 Ibe frtirtioii'il parts of a ,-t;0,92l,041 L pound bt'iu): oniitleiL STATE of the nins at I Annual Expence necessarily laid out in the Management of a Farm in the Carse of Gowiie, consisting of 272 Acres ami il t f c v July 20, 17cS7. and ending at July '20. 1793 ; the Expence stated being totally unconnected with the Maintenance of the' Farme7and h.s Fam'^' ^^'"" Years. Rent. Seeds of corn anil grass. Servants' \V;igcs. Meal used. Horses' maintenance. Smith Work. ' Wriglit Work. Thresliing mill. Saddlery accotmt. Lime for manure. Ropes bought. Petty disbursements. Totals of expenditure. Farm Servantt. Shearers. Price. Iron, nails, &c. Smiths' accomits. Wood, &c- Wrights' accounts. 1-SS 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 L. S. D. 196 3 6 203 2 4 237 1 6 229 1 1 213 11 10 253 1 10 L. s. D. 81 10 77 10 8 94 11 8 77 19 83 10 6 72 16 6 L. S. I'. 34 14 36 4 7J 40 14 4\ 37 3 11 43 17 48 15 2 B. F. P. 92 1 90 1 3 84 3 2 89 2 78 2 75 1 L. S. D. 73 l6 58 13 6 67 12 71 12 62 16 63 18 9 L. S. D. 104 19 3 117 1 130 9 3 137 18 6 151 11 265 4 10 L. S. D. 7 11 6 6 16 3i 5 14 ll 5 9 5 11 13 11 1 12 4 L S. D. 9 17 4^ 5 9 5 7 17 9 9 10 9 15 18 11 8 L. S. 1), 2 7 8 2 3 6 4 19 1 3 10 7 8 3 9 L. S. D. 8 4 3 2 19 8 9 10 6 37 16 5 4 12 7 5 L. S. 1). 10 10 10 10 10 10 L. S. 11. 13 5 8 2 10 3 17 4 1" 10 1 9 ■i I" S. D. 37 10 40 6 10 46 15 8 none. 25 5 none. V. s. D. 1 15 1 4 5 2 6 3 2 2 11 2 2 5 2 4 9 L. s. D. 31 16 6| 23 8 10 22 7 1 24 15 2 22 14 4 31 3 2 I.. s. D. 613 10 9 587 2 1 683 16 1 616 17 5 653 2 4 789 9 4 Div. by (S. 1332 2 1 487 18 4 241 9 1 510 3 1 398 8 3 907 3 10 :w 17 7 61 1 2i 21 4 7 56 3 8 Go 21 11 149 17 6 11 15 9 156 5 1,1 ;i91.3 18 gen. aver. 222 4 1^ 81 6 4f 40 4 10 85 2j., 66 8 01 151 4 6 9 7 10 3 6^ 3 10 9 9 7 3i 10 3 11 10 24 19 6 1 19 3i 26 10 " As the rent of any particular farm would not apply to the country at large, it was judged proper to avoid slatinir it in this table. « The annual expence of the farm, on an average of si.x years, is, by the above state, L, 657, Cs. 4d. exclusive of rent ; and which, divided by 272, the number of acres, gives L. 2, 8s. 4d. as the expence of cul- tivating each acre. " The charge made for the maintenance of the farm horses is for corn and hay, which could have been sold at the prices charged. The threshing-mill is charged at L. 10 a-year, which iocludes interest of money and annual repairs. No interest is charged for the money sunk in stocking the farm, which may amount to L. 1500. " Petty disbursements comprehend the expence of harvest beer, c-ipcnccs attending the delivery of grain, hiring of servants, and every other charge that can properly apply to the farm.''^View of the Agri- culture of the Carse of Gowrie, by Mr James UoDaldson, p. 38. AVERAGE PRODUCE per Acre of each Species of Crop, on a Farm in the C.irse of Gowrie, for Six Years, commencing with Crop 1787, and including Crop 1792 ; and also the aveiage Prices at wiiich they were sold in each of these Years. Peas and Beans. Early Peas. Hay. Average pro- duce per acre. 17f7 1788 1789 17"0 179! I7!)2 Average pro- duce per acre. Average price per bolL Average pro- duce per io| l)iv.by6.45 2 1 gen, aver.l 7 2 Ij 47 2 2J F. 15 5 18 ()}. 19 6| 9 II 2 9 1 II I 10 .9 3 2^ Average pric per boll. Average prO' duce per acre 14 9 12 10 15 9 14 8J 15 2 16 91 1 1 4 9 Hi duce per a 12 10 n 14 14 12 IS none, none, none. !0 1 Oi 6 3 Average price per boll. Average of Average pro- duce per mea- lUred boll. Average Average produce price per stone. Price same as peas and lieans. 14 1 12 9 IS 6 362 3 3 Ij not stated. U 4 O 4 4 2^ 200 100 2S6 83 200 187 Average price per | 1 7 7J 1036 5 6i 172S 121i 20i 13 12 16 12 26 12 ISj 12 13, 12 34.- 12 " N. B. — It should be remarked here, that the above average return from (he acre, is npon a farm not under a regular rotation of cropping, and therefore the general average of the crops is considerably less than it Trould have been, had the farm been cropped in six parts, as formerly mentioned. " The boll of wheat weighs fourteen stone Amsterdam ; barley, eighteen stone ; oats, from fourteen stone (o fourteen stone and a half; and peas and beans, from thirteen to fourteen stone." — 'N lew of the Agricult ure of the Car>ie of Gowrie, by JMr James Donaldson, p. 18. Hiinted by c;corge Uanuay and Co. Edinburgh, 181S. Jcres and that for Six Years, begin. ^i the Farmer and li.s Family. icres, gires L. 2, 8s. 4d.as the expence of cul- I I M la I M:A V jt\p m'-