LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAICN 355.09415 K22c 1860 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Alternates https://archive.org/details/ondefenceofirela00keat_2 ON THE DEFENCE OF IRELAND. NOTICE, The Irish National Publishing Association Limited being a Company founded on purely commercial principles, the Directors desire it to be distinctly understood that they are not accountable for, and the Association disclaims all connection with, any opinions which may be expressed in any particular woik of which they are made the medium of publication by the author or proprietor. ON THE DEFENCE OF IRELAND; INCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON SOME OTHER SUBJECTS CONNECTED THEREWITH. BY THE LATE LIEUT.-GEN. SIR HENRY SHEEHY KEATING, K.C.B. [then (1795) LIEUTENANT KEATING.] WITH NOTES, AND AN APPENDIX ON CERTAIN MILITARY PRINCIPLES USEETTL FOR THE BETTER UNDERSTANDING OE THE TEXT ; TOGETHER WITH A SHORT ACCOUNT OF THE AUTHOR. DUBLIN: PUBLISHED BY THE IRISH NATIONAL PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION LIMITED. [Reprinted from the original Pamphlet printed by J. Byrne, 108 Grafton-street, 3795.] 1860 . Si Saraceni , mjuriis fatigati, ab eis ( Siculis ) cceperint dissidere , et castelias forte maritime, vel montanas munitiones occupaverent; ut hinc cum Theutonicis summa virtute pngnandum. Illinc Saracenis crebris insultibus occurrendum, quid putas acturi sunt inter has de- pressi angustias, et velut inter malleum et incudem constitutif Z55..o§+\$ \< 8 . 8 - C. V5W0 ~ EDITOR’S PREFACE; (CONTAINING A SHORT ACCOUNT OF THE AUTHOR.) The Pamphlet now reprinted was first published in the year 1795. It attracted at the time no little attention ; and it has ever since been regarded with so much interest that copies of it have long been much sought after, not only by collectors of rare pam¬ phlets, but by the thinking portion of the public in Ireland in general. It is reprinted here, word for word,—except the Second Chapter, (see p. 9,) which would be totally uninteresting to the modern reader, because the observations of which it entirely con¬ sists are all of them only applicable to the material circumstances of a past generation, and wholly inapplicable to those of the present time. An Appendix has been added, (p. 101,) containing full and it is hoped simple explanations of the various Military Principles alluded to in the text, and of terms which without ex¬ planation would probably be found unintelligible by the unpro¬ fessional reader ; and at the end of this Appendix an Additional Note will be found, (p. 136,) taken from the works of the late illustrious General Sir Charles J. Napier, G.C.B., containing much valuable criticism and many practical observations upon the same interesting subject. Concerning the life and career of the Author of the Pamphlet, the present Editor has been favoured with a Memorandum by one of the most distinguished authorities upon Irish Military History, the well-known author of the “ Green Book,”* and Editor (for the Archaeological Society) of Col. O’Kelly’s “ Ma- * “ The Green Book; or Gleanings from the Writing-Desk of a Literary Agitator.” By John Cornelius O’Callaghan. Dublin : T. O’Gorman; 1841; (480 pp.) [A Second Edition (greatly improved) was published, in 1844, by Mr. James Duffy, Wellington Quay.] — VI. editor’s preface. carise Excidium,”*—John Cornelius O’Callaghan, Esq.,—to the completion of whose long expected “ History of the Irish Brigade” the public of Ireland look forward with so much interest. Some of the dates recorded, will perhaps excite surprise, when it is remembered, that at the beginning of the present century, the su¬ perior ranks of the British Army were closed to the Catholic sol¬ dier,—and General Keating was a Catholic. It is an interesting fact, that he was the first Catholic who rose to command in that Army for many generations; and he did so, it is said, in conse¬ quence of a mistake on the part of the Government of the day as to the religion of the hero, whom they hastily promoted, on occa¬ sion of extraordinary services in the East as they would have promoted a Protestant officer, only discovering when it was too late (for a formal announcement in Parliament could not well be retracted) that he did not belong to the favoured persuasion. The late Sir Henry Sheehy Keating, K.C.B., entered the English Army, as an Ensign, in 1793, his first commission bearing date Aug. 31, in that year. The dates of his subsequent promo¬ tions and appointments are as follows : Lieutenant, Jan. 3,1794 ; Captain, Sept. 8,1796 ; Major, Sept. 3, 1800 ; Lieutenant-Colonel, Aug. 1, 1804; Colonel, June 4, 1813; Major-General, Aug. 12, 1819; Lieutenant-General, Jan. 10, 1837. He was named a Knight Commander of the Bath in 1836; and on April 4,1845, he was appointed to the Colonelcy of the 33d Foot. He died at Cheltenham, in England, Sept. 12, 1847, at the age of 70. Of General Keating’s services (to the English Crown) Mr. O’Callaghan’s Memorandum notes the following : he was sent with the expedition under Sir Charles Grey to the West Indies, shortly after he entered the army ; he landed at Martinique early in 1794 ; he was present at the affair of La Trinity, at the attack of Mont Pouge, and at Mont Calabasse, where his sword-arm was broken by a musket-shot; and he was also engaged at the defence of Berville Camp, when, his skull being fractured by a shell, he was made prisoner; he was kept on board a French prison-ship for eighteen months, and he was three months afterwards still a close * u Macarice Excidium , or The Destruction of‘ Cyprus being a Secret History of the War of the Revolution in Ireland, (1688-1891); by Colonel Charles O’Kelly.’’ Edited, from four English copies, and a Latin MS. in the Royal Irish Academy,—with Notes, Illustra¬ tions, and a Memoir of the Author and his descendants,—by John Cornelius O’Callaghan. Dublin: For the Irish Archaeological So¬ ciety, 1850; (556 pp.). editor’s preface. Vll. prisoner at Rochelle. In 1807, when a Lieutenant-Colonel, he went to the East Indies. In 1809 he, with Commodore Rowley, planned the attack upon and succeeded in the capture of the town and shipping of Saint Paul’s, in the Island of Bourbon. In 1810, in command of 5,000 men, he conquered that island, reducing the garrison to be prisoners of war, and making himself master of their arms, ammunition, and materiel. He afterwards commanded the advance of the army in an attack upon the Isle of France (Mauritius), and was wounded in the arm by a sword-thrust. For his services in that part of the East the East India Company pre¬ sented him with a piece of plate of the value of five hundred guineas. The Editor is further informed by Mr. O’Callaghan, that he be¬ lieves Sir Henry Keating was married to a sister of the Right Rev. Dr. Singer, (formerly S.F.T.C.D., and afterwards Protestant Bishop of Meath), by whom he had one or two sons ;—that one of Sir Henry’s sisters, married to the late Commissioner Therry, was the mother of the present Hon. Roger Therry, late Chief Justice of Sidney;—and that another sister, named Theodosia, was in 1790 at the same school with Mr. O’Callaghan’smother, in Cork Convent. Mr. O’Callaghan adds, that the late Roger Sheehy Keating, who was married to a sister of Lady Kenmare, was an elder brother of General Sir Henry Keating. AUTHOR’S ADYERTISEMENT; TO THE READER. The Author is sensible that the following sheets require more correction than it has been in his power to bestow on them. The observations they contain might have been arranged more metho¬ dically, and deduced more coherently. Strongly impressed with the perilous situation of the country, [1794,] and in the habit of meditating on the train and vicissitude of human events, he is convinced that there is nothing possible which may not be appre¬ hended. It does not seem bad reasoning to say, that whatever has happened elsewhere similar causes may produce here ; and it does not appear bad sense to neglect seriously how we would act, were such things to occur here as have happened elsewhere. * In this slight sketch there are, at any rate, no wanderings of imagination, no abstract theories, no inapplicable speculations? none of these theoretical reveries, specious in the closet, but im¬ practicable in application. There is no opinion which is not war¬ ranted by fact, or by authority ; nor any inference which analogy will not justify. Time will shew whether the man who palliates and conceals the imminence of danger, or he who probes the wound, and arouses to the true sense of it, is the real friend of his country. * [The Author does not say from what point of view he intends the reader to regard the subjects proposed for reflection. His observa¬ tions are quite general. They will be found tor the most part very true,—in a sense very different from that of an English officer.] AUTHOR’S PREFACE, The military situation of Ireland is little understood ; yet from local circumstances, as well as the extraordinary turn human affairs have taken within the last six years, [1789-95,*] it is likely to become the scene of important transactions. Its situation be¬ tween the old and new worlds, its fine harbours, and the number of inhabitants which the fertility of its soil and its insular situation have enabled it to maintain, have caused it notwithstanding the misfortunes it has laboured under for five centuries past, to ad¬ vance with rapid strides towards its proper station in the scale of nations [ i.e ., between 1782 and 1794] ; yet it is little known to its own inhabitants, and too little to its close allyf and sister J Kingdom. It is hoped that ah humble endeavour to make both better acquainted with it will, if successful, be attended with mutual advantages §. Ireland has seldom been inspected by a military eye. Those of its natives who aim at the profession go where their hopes and ambition have a greater field ; and the British military service is not exactly calculated to encourage application or study,—for we see too many instances where after an officer has devoted his life [Shall we say, also, 1854-60 ?] f [•] t [I I] § V I 0 X. AUTHOR*S PREFACE. (the best part of it) thereto, he finds the utmost to which he can extend his hopes is : permission to retire ; that it is not in the field or the closet, hut at the levee, that he ought to have employed his time ; and that his application to his science has been thrown away in acquiring knowledge, of which, when acquired, there is no one capable of judging, and which must, therefore, in all pro¬ bability remain locked up in his breast for ever. The only real military work wrote in the English language [up to 1795] is by General Lloyd. His two volumes, particularly his second, contain ideas that can never be too much resolved in a military man’s mind. In this light they are considered by the officers of science on the continent; they prove the extent of his genius. What little more has been written in English is merely compilation, some of which is selected with tolerable judgment from the only good school, the Prussian; the rest consists of puerilities, which nothing but the gross ignorance of the [English] nation in everything that regards that profession could have enabled to pay for paper and printing. However, such as they are, by dint of great names, lofty deduc¬ tions, and long lists of subscribers, they contrive to hold their station upon the shelves of every man who wishes to hold himself forth in the light of a martinet. The yagers, or gamekeepers, of the Austrian gentry are in time of war formed into corps receiving double pay. Each corps, in the Seven Years’ War, consisted of about two hundred. The utility of them must be obvious. They were all men of approved fidelity, and excellent marksmen; but the principal advantage derived from them was that they could not be placed in a spot of the German Empire with which at least some of them were not intimately acquainted. Every mountain, defile, river, and pass they had a thorough knowledge of, and therefore could approach author’s preface. XI. nearer the enemy, and watch his motions more closely and more safely, than any other corps of light troops whatever. Of these corps, during the Seven Years’ War, one was com¬ manded by Lloyd, the other by a most able officer, Edward Count Dalton, who served, as did several more of his family, the House of Austria, for many years, with equal advantage to it and credit to themselves. He finished his honourable career by a cannon shot at Dunkirk. So much has been said of General Lloyd prefatory to the intro¬ duction of certain observations quoted from his writings, part of which the event has proved prophetical; what has not yet been proved so it is to be hoped wise measures and foresight will fur¬ nish the means of contradicting. After describing the general strength of the French frontier, speaking of that part from Sedan to Dunkirk, he says: It has been the scene of successive wars for nearly two centuries; the most expensive, bloody, and durable of any recorded in the annals of mankind. This line is stronger by art than by nature, having a prodigious number of strong fortresses and posts on it; moreover it projects in many places, so that an enemy can enter it nowhere without having some of them iu front and on his flanks. His depots must be at Namur, Mons, and Toumay. An army of 40,000 men, and another of equal force about Conde, will so bridle his operations that he cannot advance a step without imminent danger ; for that which we suppose on the Sombre, by masking Namur, penetrates into the country of Brussels, &c., which will force the enemy to retire and abandon his own frontier. In the present state of Aus¬ trian Flanders, \1780,) [when Lloyd wrote], and the adjacent parts of Holland, nothing could prevent the two armies from overrunning the above-mentioned countries in one campaign. authoe’s peeface. xii. Yol. II., p. 181, Lloyd says: When the combined fleet ap¬ peared on onr coast, the [English] nation, unaccustomed to see an enemy so near, seemed much alarmed. I then thought it my duty to examine the possible results of an invasion, and pointed out the means of defeating it, (which he indeed eventually did;) deter¬ mined and fixed the lines on which the enemy must have acted, had he landed, and the different positions the English army must have occupied on such lines, to prevent him from advancing into the country, or keeping the post he had taken on our coast. Yol. II., p. 118, speaking of Rome, he says: After the expul¬ sion of their Kings it became a democracy , and every citizen voas bred and trained a soldier ; it was the only trade; the time not employed in war was given to agriculture ; the chief occupation was war. Necessity first made that republic purely military . The right was in the people, but the power really in the Senate. The Senate, far from desisting from encroaching on the people, became daily more wanton in their oppressions. To secure their usurpa¬ tions the most proper method was to engage the people in Con¬ tinental wars, and thus keep numbers of them at a distance. The virtue and prowess of the soldier exalted the condition of the citizen; no human reward was refused to great military merit with that knowledge, the fruit of ages, and with every motive which can excite a man to the vigorous exertion of his forces, such a people must necessarily become finally superior to every other people placed in different circumstances. This difference alone rendered Rome, a military republic, superior to Carthage, a com¬ mercial one. * The first species of republics must probably fall by the hands of a citizen ; the last by those of a foreigner. * [Was Keating’s object to suggest France as the Rome, and England the Carthage, of the modern world ? It is worth thinking of I ] ATJTHOb’s peeface. xiii. P. 115, he says : Carthage was often involved in wars on ac¬ count of its distant settlements. Their armies were sufficient against the people they contended with, when their operations were confined to their islands and the coast, because their fleets could co-operate with success; and had they carried their views no farther, they might probably have existed many ages longer. But long and distant wars, supported only by money and merce¬ naries, brought on necessarily their distress and final destruction. P. 117, speaking of a confederate army, he says: The views of the different parties seldom coincide in the various points which occur in a long and extensive war. When opposed to such an army, temporize, use insinuations and seductions, some one or other of the parties will grow tired, and fall under temptation;—or attack vigorously the dominions of one of the members; this will create a powerful diversion, and his defection will probably break the confederacy. If anything in the following pages can tend to convince the people of these countries of their alarming situation, of the danger of the enemy they are now [1795] at war with, and of the necessity of a general exertion of the whole people, and that they [i.e., the British] can place no reliance on foreign succour [against France], the view with which they are written will be fulfilled. CONTENTS. Page. EDITOR’S PREFACE; (containing a short Account of the Author). .. .. .. .. v. AUTHOR’S ADVERTISEMENT, To the Reader... viii. AUTHOR’S PREFACE. .. .. .. x. Chaptee I.—Of the face of the country.—Coasts.—Har¬ bours.—Landing places.—Inhabitants.—Towns. —Natural and artificial strength. .. .. 1 Chaptee II.—Of the probability of an attack by the French.—In what part they would most probably make it.—On the likelihood of success or failure. —With what force. .. .. .. 9 Chaptee VI.—On an Armed Yeomanry.—Cavalry.—And Chaptee III.—Of the form of debarkation—And where it is or is not to he apprehended. .. 11 Chaptee TV.—Of the best method of opposing a disem¬ barkation. .. .. .. .. 14 Chaptee V.—Campaigns of Schomberg, William III., and Ginkle, in Ireland. .. .. .. 17 [Note.—O n the numbers, at each side, engaged at the Battle of Aughrim.] .. .. .. 34 Free Corps of Infantry. .. .. 35 CONTENTS. XY. Chapter VII.—System of Defence by Cordons. .. 48 Chapter VIII.—Another Plan. .. .. 63 Chapter IX.—On Camps. — Positions. — And Inunda¬ tions. .. .. .. .. .. 65 Chapter X.—Duty of Officers. .. .. .. 74 Chapter XI.—On the internal situation of the country. 77 Chapter XII.—On Frontiers in general.—On Descents, and Passage of Rivers. .. .. .. 87 Chapter XIII.—On the present state of Defence of the Country.—The force, and probable distribution of it.—And on the expenses and necessities of the Campaign. .. .. .. ., 91 Chapter XIV.—Finances.—Taxes.—Revenues. .. 94 Chapter XV.—Miscellaneous Observations. .. 97 APPENDIX.—[Note on certain Military Principles, useful for the better understanding of Gen. Keating’s Treatise. .. .. .. 101 I.— Strategy. —§ 1.—General considerations. .. 101 § 2.—The Base of Operations. .. .. .. 102 § 3.—The Object of Operations. .. .. .. 103 § 4.—Strategic Points. .. .. .. .. 103 §5.—Decisive Points. .. .. .. .. 104 § 6.—The Front of Operations. .. .. .. 104 § 7.—Lines of Operations. ♦. .. .. .. 104 §8.—Lines of Communications. .. .. 105 § 9.— Marches. .. .. .. .. .. 106 § 10.—Of Diversions. .. .. .. .. 106 §11.—Of the Passage of Rivers. .. .. 106 § 12.—Of Entrenched Camps. ., .. .. 108 xvi. CONTEXTS. § 13.—Of Fortresses. § 14.—Of Magazines. §15.—Of Cantonments. §16.—Of Retreats. .. § 17.—Of Descents. § 18.—Of the Defence of Coasts. II. — Tactics.— § 19.—General considerations on Tactics. § 20.—Of Defensive Battles. §21.—Of Offensive Battles. .. .. ,. § 22.—Of Unexpected Battles. §23.—Of Mountain Warfare. § 24.—Formation of Troops. .. § 25.—Of the Dispositions peculiar to the different Arms. (1.)—Infantry. (2.)—Cavalry. .. .. (3.)— Artillery. III. — Marches.—Man(euvres.—§ 26.—Of Front Marches. §27.—Of Marches in Retreat. § 28.—Of Flank Marches. .. § 29.—Of Retreats. § 30.—Of Defiles. .. §31.—Of Wood-Fighting. .. ADDITIONAL NOTE ; (from the Works of the late Gen. Sir C. J. Napier). .. Popular Wars. Commanders. Commanders of a Regiment. Order of Battle. .. Cavalry. [On “Physical Force/’] PAGE 108 110 110 111 111 112 . 113 113 114 117 117 118 120 120 123 125 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 136 137 140 141 142 144 ON THE DEFENCE OF IRELAND. CEAPTEE I. OF ITS IMPORTANCE, &c. ©F THE FACE OF THE COIJNTEY-COASTS-HAEBOTJES— LANDING PLACES—INHABITANTS—TOWNS—NATURAL AND AETIFICIAL STRENGTH* Ireland, situated at the extremity of the old world, has for some centuries back, been hardly known to it, farther than appearing an unimportant spot in the map of Europe. Yet this small spot is probably more essential, not merely to the consequence, but to the very existence of Eng¬ land, (1) than all those exterior possessions, to retain or (1) [“ essential . . . to the very existence of England ”—This was a favourite theory, or rather a favourite statement, current among the Anglo-Irish at the time of the publication of this pamphlet. It is now, however, no longer a matter of question, even among the most careless thinkers on the subject, that while on the one hand Ireland once set at liberty would be quite strong enough of herself to preserve 2 DEFENCE OF IBELAKD. acquire which, she has been lavishing her blood and treasure, and accumulating debt upon her landed property for this century past. Extraordinary as it may appear, with all the advantages the island in question possesses, the benefits which England appears to have endeavoured to derive from her have been merely negative. It seems as if the object of the sister kingdom had been not to derive good , but to prevent the possibility of rivalship ( 2 );— witness the restrictions on her trade, taken off a few years ago (3)*. But if England thinks it necessary for her, as she ever must, to maintain a navy for the defence, not only of her exterior possessions, hut also of her own coast, the situa¬ tion of Ireland points it out for the place of arms. (4) her independence, on the other hand the separation of Ireland from England conld by no means of itself cause the ruin of a state whose wealth is certainly hut little increased in proportion even by all it is able to drain from this country, and whose strength and station in the world have long been probably rather lowered than exalted by the connection.] (2) [“ to prevent the possibility of rivalship.” —The whole of the history of the last century proves the truth of this observation ; and every one who has watched the course of English legislation and ad¬ ministration in the affairs of trade and commerce as well as of mere politics down to the present day, must perceive that the same prin¬ ciple has still continued to govern the counsels of our masters. The notorious history of the efforts of Ireland for so many years to pro¬ cure the establishment of an Atlantic Mail Packet Station on her western or southern coasts, and the attitude of her government even to-day with respect to the Galway enterprise, may be named as affording the latest examples of the fact.] * Those restrictions were of no benefit to England, though ruinous to Ireland. One or two trading towns, indeed, derived some trifling advantage, but by no means such as to make it a national concern. — Author's Note. (3) [“ a few years ago.” —That is in 1782-3.] (4) [“ the situation of Ireland points it out for the place of arms.” —Had Ireland become, or were she ever destined to become, a West- Britain, in imitation of Scotland, this observation would be unde- DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 3 The westerly and south-westerly winds which pre¬ vail in these latitudes for nine months in the year, are an insuperable disadvantage to England as a naval power; and from the port of Brest, by its situation on the At¬ lantic, a blow can be given to England before her fleet could get out of the Channel. (5) But Cork possesses the same advantages over Brest which Brest does over Ply¬ mouth, not to mention the many other fine harbours on our coast, whose names are hardly known out of Ireland. Perhaps the importance of Ireland to the sister kingdom will never be felt, unless it falls into the hands of an enemy. (6) Should that ever be the case, the possession of it would empower that enemy, from its south-western and northern points, effectually to cripple the naval and commercial exertions of England, and in consequence re¬ duce her to as insignificant a state as the island of Sar- niably true. But England has never allowed herself to be persuaded to establish in Ireland a naval station or an arsenal, nor will she do so.] (5) [before her fleet could get out of the Channel —The force of this remark is no longer of course so great, since the application of steam power on so great a scale to ships of war. It is however even yet to a certain extent true, and will probably continue to be so for many years to come at least. Cork does still possess a great advan¬ tage over Brest, and Brest over Plymouth, in a nautical point of view; and Cherbourg, the greatest station of all, has since the au¬ thor’s time grown gradually to fulfil even in these days of steam all the conditions he imagined for Brest alone.] (6) [unless it falls into the hands of an enemy.” —That is of course an enemy to England. Mr. Keating did not perhaps think it pru¬ dent, in 1795, to suggest the probability of Ireland’s existence as a state neither French nor English, in which case there is no reason to suppose that her harbours should be put to the sole use of those in¬ to ested in destroying the trade of England. In the hands of such an enemy of England as France was during the last great war, for example, it is however true enough that these harbours might easily (and now as easily as then) be turned to account to the utter ruin of, not indeed of England as a state, but of the supremacy of England on the ocean.] 4 DEFENCE OF FREE AND. dinia in the scale of European powers. In fact, if s great naval power ever cultivates the advantages of Ire¬ land to the utmost, that will alone insure her dictating t® all the rest of Europe on the ocean. (7) Eut we must likewise throw into the scale the great supplies which this country affords to a naval power. Except the article of timber, she has, or may have, every other. In the article of provisions, the fertility of her soil and mildness of her climate give her a decided ad¬ vantage over any other country in the universe. Her ports are never frozen up, as is the case in the north of Europe and America; and she has none of those tedious and dangerous channel navigations which all the other nations of Europe, Erance and Spain only excepted, are obliged to undergo. Should Ireland by the misfortune of war fall into the power of any foreign country, the separation from Eng¬ land would be felt and deplored; their situations and mutual wants are such as no substitute could be found for (8). The linen trade which constitutes the wealth of half the kingdom, and coals, so essential to our manu- (7) [“ dictating to all the rest of Europe on the ocean ”—But Ire¬ land as an independent country could not enjoy this power, nor would she ever need it. If Keating’s observation he correct, then it would hut follow that in the interests of France and England together both ought to see that Ireland be an independent state.] (8.) [“ such as no substitute could be foundfor. . . . A conquest of Ireland . . . woidd be the greatest misfortune that could befall this island .”—In the whole of this paragraph Keating appears to have intended to convey but a little humorous irony. It is needless to remark that we are by no means naturally so dependent on England as here suggested; and the history of the last half century has abundantly proved whether “ separation from England,” even at the hands of “ a foreign enemy [of England],” would not at any time have been, and have been felt by the great majority of the nation, rather a boon from heaven than a u misfortune” in any point of view what¬ ever. Of course the question is now one of a purely speculative character merely.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 5 factures, would be for ever lost to us; for hitherto there has been no reason to believe the island contains any adequate supply within itself. The two most obvious articles among those necessary to this country are here specified. The detail might be much enlarged, but as it is not at all the object of this publication to consider any point not immediately connected with the military situa¬ tion of the kingdom, no farther deduction shall be drawn from the foregoing premises than, that a conquest of Ire¬ land, and consequent separation from England, by a foreign enemy, would be the greatest misfortune that could befal this island. (8) The surface of Ireland presents a great tract of fertile land, in all its variations of pasture and tillage; but over this are interspersed great tracts of mountain. The flat and fertile lands are interspersed with great tracts of bog, of which most are passable in some parts to infantry, but not to cavalry or to artillery; a difficulty which is however compensated, in the infinity of most excellent roads, run¬ ning in all directions to and from the coast to the capital, as well as cross roads, intersecting them in every point. Lakes and chains of rapids are another leading feature in the face of Ireland, and though the rivers are not large, yet as the banks are strong and afford good positions, or if not strong by elevation, are boggy, they are all of conse¬ quence in a military view. Eut the great object in the map of Ireland is the Shannon. This great chain of lakes cuts off an entire province from the rest of Ireland, and may be classed with the Elbe, and almost with the Ehine, whose hanks furnish so many important events in the military history of Europe. (9) (9) [“cuts off an entire 'province .” — Certainly no longer, in a military point of view, at least in case of armies provided w ith the usual military equipments of modern times. Nevertheless the Shannon is of course an important military feature; and in some 6 DEFENCE OF IUEIAND. The northern parts, and southwestern point, are the most mountainous, the others the most fertile parts of the island; these last produce that redundance of provisions which we export to other countries with so much profit to ourselves (10); and of course it is from these only that an army, friendly or hostile, can expect to draw subsistence. Ireland has no woods; its fuel in the interior parts is entirely turf, and therefore it is necessary that an army should be prepared to make use of that fuel, or so provide itself as not to stand in need of any, during the time of its absence from its magazines. The coasts of Ireland are in general bold, All the western, north-western, and southwestern parts have fine harbours, (those in the Channel are not so good) the west and south-westerly winds prevail on those coasts, and the tide rises everywhere to a considerable height. The coast counties are in general thinly peopled, producing consider¬ able quantities of cattle, but not having many mills or stores, where any quantity of grain is laid up at a time, more than necessary for the actual residents from one year to another.*' Therefore, if an enemy landed on those coasts, he w^ould be obliged to subsist from the sea until he was able to penetrate into the interior of the country. Trom the indentations of the coasts, they of course afford an enemy positions; their coasts are generally less inclosed than the interior of the country, the face of which is divided into squares of larger or smaller size, by mounds places, and at some periods of the year, it will perhaps hear out General Keating’s e'ulogium even to-day.] * As there is a considerable export, there certainly are stores at the sea ports. This observation must therefore not be taken in a strict, but a relative or comparative sense.— Author's Note. [In any sense it is less true now, and becoming daily less and less so.] (10) [ u with so much projit to ourselves .”—Irony again!] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 7 of earth, a defence against any arms but artillery, and which literally make every field a redoubt: and this descrip¬ tion extends to all the cultivated part of the kingdom. Its principal harbours are Cork, Eantry, [the Shannon] Galway, and Lough Foyle, but the landing places are in¬ numerable. These harbours have bold shores, but as the tide rises so high there is always also a considerable extent of beach. The inhabitants of Ireland consist of those resident in the great towns; tradesmen and manufacturers, who re¬ side in dispersed cottages, in the parts of the island where the linen trade is carried on; and farmers and their labourers in the other parts.*' The men of property, clergy and gentry, are much thinner dispersed through the country than in England; or, compared to the popula¬ tion, are in Scotland; and being at no pains to acquire it, are possessed of very little influence over the pea¬ santry. The towns are in general poor, of no natural * Of these, the people of the lower orders in the north are of a military turn, capable of being immediately formed into excellent soldiers. Those of the rest of the kingdom are utterly devoid of military spirit, depressed by poverty, except when they are goaded to some act of desperation ; hut still capable of being made to fight in defence of their homes and families, to which they are strongly attached; a good militia might in time he formed of them.— Author’s Note. [The testimony borne in this note to the extraordinary state of depression, political and moral, in which the Catholic population of Ireland was still plunged, so late as 1795, the date of Keating’s pamphlet, is too interesting to allow of its omission, though the author’s remark is of course wholly inapplicable at the present day. A more warlike population than that of Tipperary, Waterford, and Wexford, or that of great part of Cork, and of Clare, (all the CatholiG peasantry of to-day,) it would he difficult to find in Europe; and should Ireland ever live to be a free country, no nation possesses a population better able or more willing to assert its independence than that of the Catholic counties. As for Ulster, it is to-day full two-thirds Catholic; and its Catholic population are to the full as brave in the present generation as their Presbyterian and Protestant fellow-counrymen.] 8 DEFENCE OF IEELAND. strength, nor are there any fortified; those which had works around them were destroyed by Cromwell. The natural strength of Ireland consists in the face of the country, and the nature of the climate; it has no artifi¬ cial strength but what it possesses in the navy of Eng¬ land. CHAPTER II. OF THE PROBABILITY OF AN ATTACK BY THE FRENCH-IN WHAT PART THEY WORLD MOST PROBABLY MAKE IT-ON THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS OR FAILURE-WITH WHAT FORCE. [The observations of the author on the probability and means of an invasion of Ireland by the Erench, which occupy this chapter, are totally useless at the present day. 1st. Eor example, he points out the advantage to the Erench of Brest harbour (“the westerly and south-wes¬ terly winds/’ he says, “which blow nine months in the year, are favourable to a fleet sailing from Brest to the western coast of Ireland”), upon grounds peculiar to the circumstances of sailing vessels only. At the present day steam has so changed the face of things that it is scarcely any peculiar advantage to Erance that “Brest, taking it in a nautical point of view as regards sailing vessels], is nearer Ireland by near one-half than Plymouth.” 2d. It is no longer “ highly probable, from the present state of affairs between England and Erance, that the Erench will make an attack upon the British dominions in Europe;” the two great powers being in fact at peace, and Erance having no disposition (anymore than interest) to go to war. Yet Keating’s observation is perhaps as true to-day as it was sixty years ago when he says that: “it is not probable that she will leave England, if she can help it, in a condition . . . to do her future injury; l 10 DEFENCE OF IEEEAND. and it will always be the object of that country to crush England if she can.” And if England should ever again find herself at war with Erance, “it is also probable” (indeed far more than probable, since all Erance has long ago laid to heart the regrets of the great Napoleon at St. Helena that he had not preferred an Irish to an Egyptian expedition), “that Erance may think that as Ireland is the most vulnerable part of the British Empire, so a blow there would be the most fatal to her.” And “if,” adds the author, “the main design of the enemy was against this country, their fleet would be at sea in the mouth of the Channel, to detain the British in port, or prevent their sending out detachments, or to give battle, in order to secure the debarkation on the south-west, west, or north of Ireland, while a squadron of frigates would station themselves in St. George’s Channel to intercept succours arriving from England.” 3d. In these days of railway communication General Keating’s observations no longer apply, either with respect to the probable choice of Gal¬ way (as affording the shortest march to Dublin) as the place of debarkation for an invading force, or the difficulty now no more of suddenly concentrating at Brest (or Cher¬ bourg) an army of 50,000 men, with a sufficient transport fleet, without attracting notice by prolonged preparations. Eor the rest, when the author concludes that ‘ 6 were an attack on the coast of Ireland made, on the part of the Erench, such an attack would so far succeed as that the disembarkation might be effected,” he uses language in ex¬ pressing opinion which to-day he would only alter by assert¬ ing with positive confidence that such a disembarkation could not be effectually resisted or prevented at all.] CEAPTEE III. OF THE POEM OP DEBAEKATIOH-A HD WHEEE IT IS OE IS HOT TO BE APPEEHEHDED. If a fleet, haying arrived on onr coast, intends to effect an absolute conquest of the country, what becomes of the shipping which brought that force here is a matter of little consequence to the enemy; its business is to land the troops and stores, and not at all to re-embark them. As the object is the complete conquest of the island, and that cannot be effected until the capital is got possession of, therefore they will of course endeavour to disembark within as few days’ march of the capital as possible, ad¬ hering to that essential rule in the military art, viz., to make the line of operations as short as possible. As this expression may not be intelligible, except to military men, the following definition comprehends and explains its meaning, in as few words as it can well be put. The line of operation of an army is one drawn between the point against which it is destined, and that from whence it draws its subsistence; and this is the great and main ground-work of all plans of military movements, campaigns, &c. [see Appehdix.] But the nearest part of the coast where a landing can be effected to Dublin is Galway. (11) If a hostile fleet, * (11) [“ the nearest port of the coast. . . . Gahvay —This is of course still partly true ; but the facilities afforded by modern rail- 12 DEFENCE of IRELAND. having on board a force such as we have stated, arrives in Galway harbour, no force that could be sent against it could prevent its landing and occupying the town, and if necessary a position from the sea and their fleet on the right, to Lough Corrib on their left; there they could maintain themselves, intrench their camp, secure their flanks, or indeed, if necessary, secure a retreat i: \ Their frigates would probably make a diversion in their favour, by threatening other parts of the coast. Eut the march by Eantry is longer, and through a difficult country, as it is also from Cork, and still more so by Lough Foyle. The shortest and most eligible line of operation is by Galway, as in two days’ march they are at the Shannon; by getting possession of which they have all the province of Connaught secured to them, and in four days’ march they can be in possession of Dublin. (12) The country through which these armies would pass ad¬ mits very well of a defensive war, and like most of Ire¬ land might be disputed, therefore, should the enemy make a landing in this country, it were to be wished they should attempt it in that part; (13) but as we cannot hope much complaisance from them, it is a duty we owe ourselves immediately to endeavour to secure those parts which are vulnerable. Troops Would disembark under cover of the artillery of their vessels, if there was an army guarding the coast. way communication, at almost every part of tlie coast (except Bantry), are such that it would now be practically a matter of no importance whatever with respect to Dublin what point it might be convenient to select for the embarkation of an army of 50,000 men.] * It is evident that several positions might be chosen there, where it would be impossible to turn their flanks or rere.— Author’s Note. (12) [“four days' march ”—Even without a railway.] (13) [_ u it were to be icished ."—Of course on the un ierstanding that the population should be friendly to the English, rather than desirous to see the country well rid of them.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 13 If the opposition which they expected was trifling, they would probably come in with the tide to the shore; but if the troops appeared in force on the shore, and that it was also covered with works and cannon, they would then disembark and form upon the beach, and advance against the coast in force. It is for this reason high strong tides and extensive strands are favourable to the operations of the enemy. CHAPTER IT. OF THE BEST METHODS OF OPPOSING A DISEMBARKATION. Maizeroy enters largely into the defence of a coast against incursions, hut avoids saying anything relative to an invasion in force, as such an occurrence had not, like the other, come under his notice. Probably he did not choose to incur the risk of reasoning on what he had never ‘seen; it is much easier certainly to write satisfactorily upon the one than upon the other. Wherever a landing is to be apprehended, the whole of that coast ought to be well reconnoitred, and the water sounded, and the positions for opposing the enemy chosen. (14). The previous arrangements having been made, on his appearance on the coast, the troops destined for the defence of it should immediately assemble at the appointed rendezvous. If batteries, and the other works, have not been thrown up, they ought to be so. The enemy will land upon as level a shore as they can, under cover of their vessels; the fire from their vessels would probably be very great, (14) [“ the whole of that coast ought to he well reconnoitred , and the water sounded ”-—There is now, however, no part of the shor«i, or indeed of the island itself, of which the most minute and accurate maps and charts may not be had at a very small expense ; and it is well known that the war-office of our continental neighbours has long ago been provided with the Ordnance Survey Maps of Ireland, and with all the English Admiralty Charts of our coasts and harbours.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 15 suppose four hundred guns; it is therefore the object of the troops who defend to close upon the enemy imme¬ diately on their landing, as from that time their artillery, in which they will till then to a certainty he superior, will be useless. Should they be driven back to their boats, the batteries must again open upon and endeavour to sink them. Though troops disembarking in a bay, where there are several landing places possess an advan¬ tage over the defending army, inasmuch as acting on a smaller segment they can mask their real intention by feints till it is too late to prevent them, and they act from a centre, whereas their opponents act to one, which is an advantage. If the enemy intrenches himself, and that the troops do not arrive in time to prevent that, yet before he advances, the intrenchments ought to be imme¬ diately stormed, and an attack by cannon upon the fleet from the heights at the same time to distract their at¬ tention, and prevent their sending succours. If once driven from their intrenchments, their destruction ought to be the consequence. Yet two Tuscan frigates at Algiers, by an enfilading fire, contrived to save the Spanish army; the retreat was covered by the grenadiers commanded by Col. O’Brien ; only one shot was fired by them during the retreat, though the Algerine cavalry came up almost to their bayonets. In a landing, not less than ten thousand should disem¬ bark at a time; they should advance in as many columns as possible, and occupy the first heights, from which they should on no account whatever advance a step, but intrench themselves there. The misconduct of those who commanded our expedi¬ tions on the coast of France, in Lord Chatham’s time, was such that it is said they once encamped with their 16 DEFENCE OF FEEL AND, front to the sea and their rere to the enemy, probably u par signe de mepris” Such incursions answer no end but the destruction of those engaged in them’ as at St. Cas, unless there is well- grounded hope that the people of the country would be on the side of the invader. If the defending army can make no impression on the enemy, its artillery and baggage, &c., must be sent up the country; and it must divide itself for the purpose of ob¬ serving the motions of the enemy, and taking positions to obstruct his march to the capital until more or sufficient force assembles. CHAPTEE Y. CAMPAIGNS OF SCHOMBERG, WILLIAM in., AND GINKLE IN IRELAND. (15) William haying driven James from England, this island became the theatre of the war, which was conducted with considerable talents on both sides, and had not it been for the pusillanimity of James it might have taken a very different turn from what it did; but the mere presence of that weak and headstrong monarch was sufficient to blast his fortune, and his friends’ hopes. Schomberg landed at the head of twelve thousand men, in August, 1689, without meeting any opposition, in Car- rickfergus Bay. With the assistance of six ships of war, he took possession of that town, and on his advancing into the country the positions taken by the hostile armies were as follow: Schomberg occupied a position at Dun¬ dalk, which he found himself obliged to fortify. Bosen threatened his right flank, and James, with about thirty (15) [“ campaigns of Schomberg,—William III.—and Ginkle , in Ireland —See, for a proper understanding of these campaigns, as well as of all this portion of Irish History, the Green Book , by John Cornelius O’Callaghan, Esq. See also the admirable edition of the * Macarice Excidiuml of Colonel O’Kelly, edited by the same accu¬ rate historian for the Irish Archaeological Society; Mr. O’Callaghan’s notes to this volume are of great extent, and embrace the largest body of information ever collected together on the subject of this war, the events of which have been nevertheless since so grossly falsified by Lord Macaulay in his elegant romance entitled a History of England.] 18 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. thousand men, was posted on the Boyne at Drogheda. Thus James had Sehomberg there in a cul-de-sac, his re¬ treat cut off, his army wasting by sickness, shut up in in- trenchments, and James himself with a superior army in their front. He made a feeble and characteristic attempt to vanquish Sehomberg by treachery, and even then, when nothing more was wanting to the destruction of his enemy’s army, hut James’ giving the word to attack, his resolution failed, and he retired to his former position, letting Sehomberg escape, and retreat umnolested. June, 1690, William landed with 36,000 men, and marched along the eastern coast toward the capital, drawing his supplies from his fleet. James’s army, con¬ sisting of 30,000 men, lay in their position as before de¬ scribed at Drogheda, and he was now obliged, contrary to his inclination, to venture an action. James’s position was well chosen; his right appuye on Drogheda, which he occupied, his front to the Boyne, fordable but deep, with strong hanks which were intersected by mounds of earth, hedges and ditches, his army presented a front of about three miles, extending towards Slane, where was a bridge which he neglected to occupy; the river toward the centre of James’s position forms a considerable project¬ ing bend, and another in reverse higher up towards Slane. This is important, as the fate of the battle was in a great degree decided by its locality, the effect of which, on the manoeuvres of the two armies, was strongly marked in the course of the day; for it is to be observed both parties had neglected to occupy the pass of Slane. William advanced in three columns to the opposite banks of the river, reconnoitred, and adjusted his plan of operation, determining to attack by the right and centre. Accordingly, in the morning, he detached a corps to pass by Slane; this corps arrived DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 19 sooner at its destination than that sent by James (who saw his error too late) to anticipate it, which by the curve of the river was forced to make a considerable detour, whereby time, as we have stated, was given to William’s detachment to arrive and seize the pass before them; having crossed which, and formed, they advanced on the left of James’s army, and, extending to the right, turned it, not¬ withstanding a morass in its front, by which manoeuvre it was compelled to fall back in confusion toward Duleek. William had so combined his attacks that his centre was to pass at the time his right should have completely engaged the left of James’s army. When that, there¬ fore, was seen to have taken place, his centre column advanced against Old-Bridge, andhis left to the fords, which having passed, and gained the opposite hank at the pro¬ jecting curve of the Boyne, they there formed and received an attack from the right and centre of James, which they repulsed, and advanced. The Irish army fell hack above two miles, to Donore, where they formed, and advanced again to the charge; but William’s cavalry, having, ac¬ cording to their orders, completely turned their left, the fortune of the day could not be recovered, and they were forced to fall hack, pursued with loss, to Duleek, behind which they again rallied. This is one of the most interesting actions recorded in history. James’s position was well chosen; his great and glaring misconduct was in not occupying the pass of Slane with a strong corps of infantry and artillery, covered by works. This was the key to his post, and had it been properly guarded, William could not have forced his posi¬ tion; hut when he had turned James’s left, it enabled him, after his centre had crosed the Old-Bridge, to deploy it; for James’s centre was obliged to fallback, seeingthe enemy’s cavalry on their flank. The cavalry was not then what 20 DEFENCE OF IEEEAND. it is now, but that of both armies were much on a par.* Though the country was unfavourable for that army, yet they decided the day both here and at Aughrim. Had Slane been occupied, William must have gone higher up the Boyne in order to have passed. It appears a great neglect on the part of William not to have intercepted the Irish army at Huleek. They must have surrendered or been driven into the sea. Probably he did not wish to be embarrassed with James as a prisoner, following the proverb adopted from the Spaniards, “ A Vennemi qui se retire un pontd’or.” James was glad to have an excuse for fly¬ ing to Versailles. From this time James’s army acted without a plan; but they were reduced to despera¬ tion. The resource they adopted of retiring behind the Shannon was a good one; William’s followed them in a disorderly manner. Grace, who commanded in Athlone, had occupied the town west of the Shannon, with four thousand men, supported by another corps in the neigh¬ bourhood. Douglas attempted to reduce it with a battery of six guns; this not succeeding to his wishes, he re¬ treated with disgrace. Meantime, William laid siege to Limerick, where Sars- field performed a gallant action with a corps of cavalry. He made a detour, crossed the Shannon at Killaloe, came in the rere of William’s army within about seven miles, * No success gained by James’s right and centre could alter the events of that day. Had they even thrown their opponents back into the river, still William’s advancing on their flank, which was un¬ covered, could not be remedied. The attack by Slane was the grand manoeuvre. The attacks of the centre and left were only secondary ones. In this action the great system was displayed; the right at¬ tacking, the left refusing itself. Two detachments sent to seize a pass, the intermediate ground favours one more than the other. It arrives in time to form and drive in its opponent. Had James seized the pass, he could have turned William’s right, while in the act of fording the river, had he ventured to do it.— Author's Note. DEFENCE OP IRELAND. 21 and intercepted and destroyed a convoy of artillery, who thought themselves in perfect safety so near their own camp. Limerick made a gallant defence, and "William was forced to retreat. Sept. 29th, the Duke of Marl¬ borough landed at Cork with five thousand men. Having increased it to about ten thousand, he took Cork and Xinsale. Previous to the campaign of 1691 the Irish and their French allies possessed all the country west of the Shan¬ non, with the important garrisons of Limerick and Ath- lone, and were entire masters of the whole of the Shan¬ non. Ginkle having withdrawn into winter cantonments, was obliged to confine himself solely to the protection of the English frontier, as it was called, which was conti¬ nually and vexatiously harassed by incursions from the opposite side of the Shannon. To add to its misfortunes, bodies of undisciplined and insubordinate armed men, taking advantage of the unhappy times, plundered and murdered on all sides, (16) under the names of Volunteers and Eapparees, so called from the species of weapon which they were armed with, a kind of spear or pike, the first that occurs and easiest supplied. These wretches (16) having been already robbed, first by James’s, and if they escaped them, by William’s army, deprived thereby of the means of subsistence, were forced to take to a life of robbery (16), and wandered under these names in gangs, (16) [“plundered and murdered . . . under the names of Volun¬ teers and Rapparees” “ wretches . . . forced to take to a life of rob¬ bery .”—The Irish reader need scarcely be reminded now of what Lieu¬ tenant Keating seems to have strangely forgotten , that these men were neither “wretches,” “murderers,” nor “robbers,” but simply outlaws at war with the plunderers and relentless desolators of their country. Mr. James Duffy of Dublin has lately published an elegant little popular novel, in which the true character of the “ Rapparee” chiefs is fairly delineated in the person of the celebrated Count Red¬ mond O’Hanlon; a tale which will perhaps serve in some sort to 22 DEFENCE OF IRELAND, the men armed, and followed by their wives and families, whom they easily trained to the business. James’s army, elated at having forced William to re¬ treat, and indeed with reason, as it was nearly equivalent to depriving him of all the fruits of his victory,—for, in reality, he gained nothing by it but Dublin, and a deso¬ lated country, to harass their enemy,—and also with more sanguine views, projected an attack on Mullingar, and to further it occupied and fortified the town of Ballymore, which is situated half way between Mullingar and Ath- lone; but Ginkle, thinking it necessary to prevent their establishing themselves at Mullingar, advanced against them and drove them from it (it has been asserted the Irish pointed their pallisades the wrong way). Ginkle pursued them to Grenogue, where they attempted a stand in front of the town, but were driven through it, and pursued to the very walls of Athlone. The whole of this conduct on the part of the Irish was erroneous, as they ought solely to have occupied themselves in strengthening their fron¬ tier behind the Shannon, augmenting the fortifications of Athlone and Limerick, and beating up Ginkle’s quarters, whose army, dispirited and unhealthy, in bad winter quarters, would have melted away before the campaign began. In Spring, St. Ruth, a French general, sent over by that court, took the command, contrary to the feelings of the gallant Sarsfield, who deserved better treatment. St. Ruth was a man of abilities; like his countrymen, ardent, vehement, and attached to his own opinions, with a sove¬ reign contempt of the persons and talents of those with whom he has to act, who were not of his nation. He brought some French officers with him, who came fraught remove the effect of mere calumnious statements such as those adopted by Keating.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 23 with the same contempt of the natives, by whom they were universally hated. It is probable they did more harm to that cause than good; disunion and jealousy immedi¬ ately showed themselves. Though the Trench court sent officers, they did not send either money or any other re¬ quisite; but James’s army, tho’ thus abandoned by their allies, did not despair, but were, on the contrary, much elated by their late successes. St. Ruth soon decided on his plan of operations, which was to occupy the fron¬ tier presented by the river Shannon, by taking his position in aeentral point near Athlone. A great over¬ sight was committed by St. Ruth in not withdrawing his force from Ballymore, a place at that time of no con¬ sequence to him; but he suffered Ginlde on his advance to take a thousand of his best troops, then in garrison there, prisoners; a circumstance attended with peculiarly bad consequences at the opening of the campaign, as it raised the spirits of the other army, and damped those of his own. Ginkle advanced towards Athlone, and reconnoitring the army of St. Ruth, found it posted on a neck of land between two bogs, about two miles beyond the Shannon. He carried the part of the town of A thlone on the east side of the river without difficulty. St. Ruth’s army re¬ tired to the other, breaking down the bridges. Ginkle saw the danger and difficulty that was likely to attend the attempt to pass the river, under the guns of a fortress, and in front of a formidable enemy. He therefore formed a plan for that purpose, by stealing a march, and throw¬ ing a bridge of boats over it above Lough Ree, at Lanes- borough, but by his enemy’s vigilance the scheme was dis¬ covered and foiled. He then determined to force his passage in the place he occupied, and after some attempts succeeded in repairing 24 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. the bridge which St. Ruth’s army in their retreat had broken down. Haying done which he ordered his right column to attack by the bridge, and the left and centre to ford the river. St. Ruth, however, burnt the bridge, and Ginkle was obliged to countermand the attack; and saw himself reduced to the desperate necessity of retreating to Dublin, through a desolated country, exposed to the harass¬ ing of an exulting enemy. It is not often that n council of war gives its opinion for battle; the foreseeing and starting difficulties is the affectation of superior wisdom; yet it happened that Ginkle’s council did adopt the boldest, and as it generally is the wisest measure, for a failure in it could not put them in a worse situation than they were. This was for the immediate attack. Two thousand men, divided into three columns, advanced to storm the town, which was defended by about an equal number. Some resistance was made; but the gallantry of the centre column, who passed the ford under a most heavy fire, and entered the town, driving the enemy before them, enabled the other two columns to establish themselves also within the walls. St. Ruth committed an unrnrd nable error in his neglect of this post, as the event shewed. St. Ruth was obliged, by this success, to change his position, in order to cover and keep his communication open with Limerick. He therefore retreated down the course of the Shannon, and took a position behind the river Suck; his right toward the Shannon, occupying the heights called Kilcommedin Hill, upon a front of two miles; his left secured by a rivulet and a bog, which also covered his front, as far as a pass on a chain of small hills which lay opposite his right. Here he determined to wait the attack of the British. St. Ruth’s army consisted of about 24,000 men; Wil¬ liam’s of about 18,000 [wrong ; s^Hote, p. 34.] Ginkle DEEEXCiJ OE IBELAXD* 25 having called in all his detachment, on the 12th of July, 1692, attached with his left; the cavalry marched by the pass before-mentioned and deployed, covering the left flank of his infantry, as they advanced upon the enemy, who retired gradually from ditch to ditch before them. As the infantry advanced in this difficult ground, where their cavalry could not protect them, they began to find themselves enfiladed, and flanked from behind the hedges on their left; for gaps having been cut at proper inter¬ vals in the banks and ditches, the enemy had by that means got upon their flank. This gave them a check. St. Ruth, wishing to follow up his blow there, and seeing nothing to apprehend upon his left, drew away his cavalry from thence, in the intention of bringing it upon the left of Ginkle. There was a narrow pass by the castle of A ughrim, in front of St. Ruth’s left. Ginkle ordered his right wing to attack St. Ruth’s left, which was now exposed, and to defile by this pass, and form on the other side; the right of his infantry advancing through the bog, so as to form on the opposite side, by the time the cavalry of the right had formed its line. Talmash, who commanded it, executed the manoeuvre with ability, and led his corps in a column between the castle and the bog, formed on the other side, and advanced just in time to save the centre of the Rritish line of infantry, which, having waded through the bog, had attacked and driven the Irish line before them ; but falling into confusion in advancing, the Irish had rallied, and charging them in turn had driven them back with great loss into the bog. J nst at this critical instant Ginkle’s cavalry showing themselves, checked St. Ruth’s line, and gave time to his infantry (who had gone beyond their orders, which were, not to advance upon the enemy until they saw their right wing of cavalry entirely passed the castle), to rally under 26 DEFENCE OE IRELAND. the ditches at the hog’s edge, and, being re-formed, to advance in good order, with the cavalry upon their right, upon the left of the enemy. St. Ruth, to whom the ap¬ pearance of Ginkle’s right wing of cavalry so near his line was a surprise, not expecting to have had both his flanks attacked, was bringing up a reserve of cavalry for the purpose of falling on Ginkle’s right, when he was killed by a cannon shot. This fortunate (17) shot probably caused the gaining of the battle. St. Ruth had the advantage upon the right, where the first attack had been made. Ginkle’s infantry were exhausted by wading through a hog up to their middles ; they had been driven hack into that bog with loss and confusion, and St. Ruth was at that moment coming down upon their right flank with a fresh body of cavalry. So far everything was in his favour. Rut St. Ruth communicated with no one; by this con¬ duct he lost Athlone. To Sarsfield, his second in com¬ mand, he had a particular pique. His whole arrange¬ ments were confined to his own head; and Sarsfield, who (17) \ u fortunate .”—General Keating speaks, of course, as a British, officer. It is not so that any Irishman speaks of the fatal ac¬ cident which alone lost Aughrim,—a field on which the Irish army fought with a spirit and bravery which indeed deserved success, since it was never exceeded in any of the numerous engagements abroad in which the Brigade itself so often won undying laurels for themselves and for their country. The brave Saint Ruth is not yet forgotten in Ireland, and an interesting circumstance hut lately served to show that his name is still remembered in France ; for a few days hefoie the 12th of July, 1858 (the anniversary of the fatal day of Aughrim), the Parish Priest of the parish in which this cele¬ brated field of battle is situated received from the present Emperor of the French the offering of a suit of mourning vestments with in¬ structions that on that day and on every succeeding anniversary a solemn Mass should be offered up for the repose of the soul of the gallant Frenchman at the altar of the Parish Church. Ireland recog¬ nised with warm emotion the meaning of so graceful an act of piety on the part of the representative of Napoleon.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 27 succeeded to the command, was in utter ignorance of what was going on about him, except of that which imme¬ diately concerned his own post: of course, on the fall of St. Euth, everything was at a stop, the officers waiting for orders, and no one to give them. In consequence, his army first retreated, pressed by Ginkle, and then fled. The infantry, in their usual custom, to a bog,* the ca¬ valry to Loughrea. Thus £nded the battle of Aughrim, and with it the hopes of those who had attached them¬ selves to James. Ginkle’s position, previous to the attack, was on the Suck, near Ballinasloe, opposite St. Euth’s. St. Euth’s main errors, every one of which was sufficient to have caused the loss of the battle, were—First, not communi¬ cating with Sarsfield: Secondly, not fortifying the pass on his right, which would have prevented Ginkle’s ca¬ valry from passing there, and, of course, the necessity of his unfurnishing his left: Thirdly, not attacking the right wing of Talmash, while in the act of deploying, after passing by the castle of Aughrim, a manoeuvre that, by the foregoing account, must have taken up a consider¬ able time. Had the British army been defeated, St. Euth, by crossing the Shannon, might have taken a position on their rere, and destroyed their whole army. His position was chosen with great skill, and his army seem to have maintained their ground with great firmness. On the other hand, the manoeuvres of William’s army were con¬ ducted in a manner that evinced much talents on the part of the generals. It is an extraordinary circumstance, * A letter, giving an account of the battle of Kilrush, where Lord Mountgarret’s army was defeated by the Earl of Ormond, says that the adjacent bog was black (the colour of their clothing), with the multitude who fled to it, out of reach of the cavalry.— Author’s Note. 28 DEFENCE 0 IEELAND. that, in such ground, the event of the action at Aughrim (as well as at Drogheda), should have been turned by the cavalry. St. Ruth was everywhere himself during the action, hut always a little too late. He was one of those -men who never think anything properly done except what they do themselves. The army’s retiring to Loughrea after the defeat was merely accidental. Had Sarsfield’s army retired to Galway, they might probably have done better than at Limerick. Probably they would have compelled Ginkle to divide his force. At any rate / either Galway or Limerick must have been in his rere. Had Ginkle left him there, he would have lost Connaught again; and had he besieged him there, the garrison of Lime¬ rick might have made a diversion in his favour; besides, Sarsfield’s army was still numerous. St. Ruth took one precaution, which never ought to he omitted in familiar circumstances. Ditches and hanks become an inconve¬ nience to an army, if they cramp its manoeuvres. When¬ ever the situation is such, debouchures should he cut in them, in those places where they are best protected by cross fire. They should he sufficiently large for troops to pass on a considerable front, and might be closed against cavalry by chevaux de frize. If Sarsfield had retreated to Galway, Ginkle could not have left him behind. The campaign was then far ad¬ vanced, and would still have had Limerick to reduce; and an advanced season in the field is always fatal to foreigners in this country. Ginkle marched by the Munster side of the Shannon, and occupied the ground before Limerick, which the King had done the year before, on the side of Ireton’s Port. He now secured all the passes on the Shannon, the necessity of which he had been taught the last DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 29 campaign. Perceiving he could not hope to take the place without completely investing it, he passed in the night above the town, by an island, to a part of the river which is fordable, and which he gained by the connivance of the officer appointed to guard it, with a corps of dra¬ goons, as was the custom of that time ; for they had usually a great and over-proportion of cavalry, to their infantry, and were, consequently, obliged often to employ the cavalry upon services to which they were not adapted. As for instance, leaving the entire guard of a ford to them, if attacked they cannot maintain their post. A good detachment of infantry, with some works mounted with guns, are the proper defence of a ford as well as of a bridge. Ginkle having completely invested, blockaded the town to the 22d September. It is extraordinary, during this time, no attempt was made to destroy the bridge of com¬ munication and attack the forces on one side of the river, when separated; but, in general, an army which is dis¬ couraged by a series of ill success, Nes’occupe (as the King of Prussia said of his officers) qita paver les bottes que leur font les autres; observing at the same time, Maisje mettrai bientot orcb'e a cela , which he did, and turned the tide in his favour. On the 22d, Ginkle stormed the works of Thomond bridge. On the 23d, the garrison beat a parley, and by the surrender of this city, the conquest of the kingdom was completed. These three campaigns in Ireland are the only part of its military history which are in any way interesting. (18) (18) [“ the only part*of its military history .”—The Irish reader will not of course be misled by this flippant observation. When the history of Ireland comes to be honestly written it will tell a different tale. For the rest, Keating had but the education of an English officer; an education very little more accurate or more enlightened in 1795 than it is even at the present day.] 30 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. At that time the grand principles of war were un¬ derstood; and although the improvement of tactics, of which Prussia set the example, by introducing the true principles of the Greeks, has within the last fifty years, by its refinements and multiplied combinations, completely set aside the old system of warfare, yet the great princi¬ ples must ever remain, in the same manner as architecture may derive benefit from the improvements of handicraft, though the sublime principles of Euclid, on which its rules are founded, must ever remain invariable. In these campaigns, ability was shown on both sides. William was a military monarch, commanding a veteran army. James was the very reverse, commanding, or (to speak more properly) at the head of undisciplined forces, divided by different interests and views, while the faction and animosity of individuals tore them to pieces. The French affected and felt a contempt, which they did not seek to disguise, for the Irish, and the Irish retaliated in hatred to their haughty auxiliaries. Indeed, the Irish seem to have acted better from the time the French troops withdrew. (19) A few observations upon the general conduct of the campaign may not be impertinent, as they will tend to throw into one view a series of military events, highly interesting to the Irish nation at the present day, [1795], when a formidable enemy is at their very doors, and when there is reason to apprehend that, if not this, the next ensuing campaign may bring the theatre of the war into our island. Schomberg landed at Carrickfergus (as Thurot after- (19) [The statements and suggestions contained in this paragraph are very much exaggerated and calculated seriously to mislead the reader. But in notes like the present he can only be shortly put on his guard; he cannot expect to be informed upon the whole history of the period.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 31 wards did), without opposition, in the year 1689, with about ten thousand men. Haying augmented his army, he advanced to Dundalk; while James lay in an apathy, with treble his force, at Drogheda. Why James’s generals did not take a position at Hewry is unaccountable; there they might have destroyed the British army. Again, at Dundalk, they had them, as it were, in a net. Yet even the hopes of treachery could not induce James to make a real attack upon Schomberg. If he had done it his correspondence with certain parts of that army would have been attended, probably, with good effect to him; but he did not get near enough to the conspiracy to be able to make it explode ; as if there was any hope of success in war, without incurring some danger. In the campaign of 1690, Schomberg was superseded by William himself, who commanded a fine army of 36,000 men, well appointed and inured to service, and who had, in addition to those advantages, the highest confidence in their commander. James still occupied his position near Drogheda. William, with his superior force, was right to come to an action. His opponent’s position was well chosen, but the locality was not taken sufficient advantage of. The saliant curve of the Boyne was not fortified; Slane was not occupied. William might have been forced to have looked for a passage higher up the Boyne; but though he would have effected it, yet delay was injurious to him, whose presence was called for in other places, and might have been beneficial to James. William could have finished the campaign in Ireland, after his victory at the Boyne, by seizing the pass of Duleek. Probably, had he done so, he would not have been able to avoid taking James prisoner, and he did not 32 DEFENCE OF IRELAND, wish to he embarrassed with him. It may be so inferred, from the little trouble he took to follow him. After the defeat at the Boyne, the Irish army retired behind the Shannon. This was well judged. Limerick was so well defended, William was obliged to raise the siege. Next year Ginkle took it, for which he was in¬ debted to the desperate situation of James’s affairs, and, in consequence thereof, the distracted state of the garri¬ son. Athlone was taken in a gallant manner, owing to the infatuation of St. Buth. Still a victory was neces¬ sary to give William a decided superiority, and Ginkle was obliged to hazard a battle at Aughrim, where the situation of the British was such, that a defeat would to them have been utter ruin. James’s army made good use of the ditches and inclo¬ sures, in their positions; but the bayonet was not so well understood then as it is now; and wherever troops are so posted, they should be attacked with that arm. Most attacks upon intrenchments have succeeded, and the reason is obvious: an army is generally distributed through the extent of an intrenchment, and is equally weak everywhere. The assailants, on the contrary, concen¬ trate their force upon certain points, which are carried before the other party can throw in a sufficient force to counterpoise them, and once the intrenchments are en¬ tered, the flank and rere of the army is exposed; nor can they make a change of position as they could in the open held, but are tied down to one plan of operation. The only possible way of guarding against these inconveniences, is by having great reserves, but then you must contract your intrenchments, and if the flanks are not secured by the natural position, that is hard to be done, without falling into other difficulties. The feelings of the human mind also operate. The DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 33 man who stands behind the breast-work contemplates his enemy advancing. He apprehends that if he once enters the intrenchment, there is no chance of his safety but by flight. He has time to make all these kind of natural reflections. The assailant, on the contrary, kept in mo¬ tion, is animated; he looks on his arrival in the works as the period of his danger; he therefore rushes on, and generally succeeds. The French have, this war (20), made a gallant defence of intrenchments; but they have the ad¬ vantages of artillery, science, and discipline, united with incredible numbers and enthusiasm; a rare combination! In general, a chain of strong redoubts and fleches (21), are preferable to lines. It is more difflcult to run away from them. That a fewer number can thus defend an equal extent of ground, they must be so near as to support each other mutually. Another advantage which attends them is, that they leave the ground open for the army to manoeuvre, as occasion requires. They can advance to take an advantage of any confusion into which the enemy may be thrown; and, if requisite, retire behind the re¬ doubts again; all which, lines will not permit. It was well judged of Ginkle after passing the bog in the front of the enemy, at Aughrim, to order the infantry to form under the first enclosures or ditches; but the Irish committed an oversight, in leaving any such between them and the bog unoccupied; as they should have levelled all such, had they time enough. St. Ruth does not seem to have taken much pains to strengthen his position. He lost the battle of Aughrim by the same failing which had be- (20) [“ this war”— that is the war of independance after the Great Revolution.] (21) \ u fleches” —simple earthworks of the shape of a /\ , or of an arrow’s head; open behind, and not connected one with another by any wall or continued line of entrenchment.] 34 DEFENCE OF IKELAND. fore lost him Athlone—a pertinacious confidence in his own opinion, and contempt for the judgment of others. [Note ; on the Numbers, at each side, engaged at the Battle of Aughrim. (See p. 24.]) [The account in the text of the numbers on both sides at the Battle of Aughrim is now known to be incorrect. It is taken from Story, whose loose assertion has been followed without inquiry by Burnet and Le Brune. Mr. O’Callaghan (in Note 228—p. 434—to his singularly erudite and copiously-noted edition of Col. O’Kelly’s “ Excidium Macarice,” published by the Irish Archaeological Society, in 1840,) has carefully analysed the historical evidences on the whole subject; and he shows that Story’s unauthenticated assertion is at variance with the evidence supplied by Captain Parker, an officer who fought at the English side at Aughrim—by King James’ Memoirs— by Major-General Dorrington, Colonel of King James’ Foot Guards, who was made prisoner at Auschrim—by Colonel Charles O’Kelly, in the “ Macarioe Excidium” itself—and by O’Halloran, who states the uniform belief of the Irish on the subject in the generation which succeeded the time of the Battle. Finally, Mr. O’Callaghan himself examined the original records of William’s army, and has published “ the complements, when perfect, in men and officers, of the British and Anglo-Irish and Huguenot Regiments in William’s pay, from a great mass of official and original documents in Trinity College Library, Dublin, and the State Paper Office, and British Museum, London.” Mr. O’Callaghan’s detailed calculations give on Ginkle’s side a total, of Infantry (if perfect) 24,495 officers and soldiers, of Horse (Light Cavalry) 6,837, and of Dragoons (Heavy Cavalry) 2,607. Consequently, he says, “the grand total of his officers and soldiers, Infantry, Horse, and Dragoons, would under such circum¬ stances be 33,939 men —besides those connected with the artillery.” And he adds that “ the military duties to be elsewhere discharged in the country, either in garrisons, or by detachments, were entrusted to a numerous and well-armed Anglo-Irish militia, or yeomanry, and to the 15 remaining regiments of regular infantry, and 2 regiments and 2 troops of regular cavalry, that, with the 48 regiments and 14 troops of Ginkle’s army at Aughrim, would make up the total of Wil¬ liam III.’s regular forces in Ireland for the year 1691, as stated by Story, at 67 Regiments of the line —exclusive of men connected with the artillery.” According to the Irish accounts the total numbers under St. Ruth’s command at Aughrim did not exceed 17,000 (some say only 15,000.) So that, making every allowance for casual absences on the English side, by reducing the full amount of their army by above 8,000, out of nearly 34,000, it is certain that the real numbers on both sides appear to be those given in the text by Keating, but reversed.] CHAPTER YI. 0N AN AEMED YEOMANEY-CAYALEY-AND EEEE COEPS OF INEANTEY (22). It were much to he wished that the plan of arming the yeomanry, and forming them into corps of cavalry, had been adopted; hut it ought to he with much precaution. The principal precaution should he, not to have too many corps, and to pay great attention to having them in good hands. They should not he composed of too great a number of privates; as, for instance, the residence of every yeoman should be within seven miles of the place of ren¬ dezvous, in the centre of the whole; nor should their number he too small, as to every corps there ought to be five officers, resident gentlemen of influence and property. In case of the death or resignation of the captain, the next officer in command should invariably succeed him. (22) [“on an armed Yeomanry , &c.”—The suggestions in this chapter are in some respects unsuited to the circumstances of more recent times; it contains nevertheless so many observations of an interesting character that it may be as well not to omit it altogether. The reader will no doubt at once perceive that in speaking of a “yeomanry” no other idea occurred to the mind of Lieutenant Keating, in 1795, than that of a Protestant and exclusively Anglo- Irish or West-British militia. It is also sufficiently plain that the writer of the pamphlet looked upon the country to be “ defended” as the mere property of an oligarchy of “ resident gentlemen,” in whose eyes the Catholic peasantry, the really Irish people of the South and West, were and were intended to be but serfs adscripti ylebce.-] 36 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. People like those of whom such corps ought to be com¬ posed, would he disgusted and quit, were they to he turned oyer from one commandant to another, with as little ceremony as regulars; and the man who has most interest at court, has not always most interest in the country, however high he may represent his own consequence there. There is not a county in Ireland, which could not make up two such corps of one hundred yeomen each. Some could make up five hundred; but, reckoning one with another, at three hundred to each county, it would make up a body of nine thousand six hundred cavalry, main¬ tained without expense to government, ready to take the field at a day’s notice, and fit for any service cavalry could he employed in. Great care must he taken in giving the command of these corps. If they were given to any but men of liberal principles, it would do more harm than good ; a spirit of party would govern in the selection of the corps; this baneful spirit is the destruction of all security in Ireland. All feasting, electioneering, and dissipation, should also be avoided. The less they become either soldiers or gentle¬ men the better (23). The pride and glory of England is its yeomanry; it was always so since the emancipation of the lower orders from villanage. In Ireland, one or two counties excepted, there has hardly hitherto been any such, till within this century, but they are now [1795], increas¬ ing considering them as a body. In Wicklow and Wex¬ ford there is a yeomanry that would not disgrace any shire in England. (23) [ a either soldiers or gentlemen ”—An observation bitter enough, truly, in the mouth of a British officer that knew them ! It would appear that the character of the “ British soldier” was not much better regarded m 1795, than to-day.] DEFENCE OF IKELAND. 37 What makes a yeoman respectable, is the honest pride of conscious independence. The sense of his happy situation attaches him to his native soil, and the constitu¬ tion of his country; consequently, the yeomen of England have always been found the most difficult to be seduced by the spirit of innovation. An observer of the Irish nation will not perceive much of the foregoing character here; hut it depends upon the gentlemen, not the little soi disant gentleman, (the greatest tyrant and enemy the poor man has,) hut the gentlemen of landed property, to create them; it is only giving them a valuable interest in their small farms (24). When such a thing is so easily done, one would think that the example of the world, and the present times, ought to make them set about it in earnest. Mr. Arthur Young, in his tour through Ireland, saw, and has pointedly and truly detailed the grievance, and the real cause of it; and supplies some excellent hints to the gentlemen of Ireland. The poor man pays the taxes and tithes, his penury supports the splendour of the great, and ultimately he is the man to whom the defence of the coun¬ try must he intrusted; for it is evident that nothing but imminent danger can arouse the rich, and that does not appear to he a* strong inducement to them to take arms in * They called la rue ducale , at Brussels, in the time of Dumourier’s incursion, la rue des lievres (the street of the hares).— Author's Note. (24) [“ it is only giving them a valuable interest in their small farms ."—In other words if the people are made to feel that the country is theirs , they will he ready to defend it a Voutrance. Ge¬ neral Keating knew as well as any mao that the Irish people have been made to feel precisely the reverse ; and if he lived now he would probably say that in the existing condition of the people of Ireland they may be more reasonably expected to welcome than to re¬ sist any invasion likely to effect a change in the existing land tenure. There have been no real “ Yeomen” in Ireland; and it is too late for landlords to attempt to create such a class, even were they sincerely willing to do so. The peasantry of the present generation have been 38 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. their hands; or if they were willing to fight for their pro¬ perties, the number is too small to do it with any effect. Eor their own safety they ought then to put betimes those arms in the hands of a class of men, in whom they can confide, and not trust their all to the honour and self-de¬ nial of the outcasts of mankind, of men whose situation any change whatsoever must better, and who know it (25). The best defence any country can have is a happy, patriotic, and uncorrupted yeomanry. A national debt, and the concomitant evil of revenue laws, have not im¬ proved the morals of the people of England and Ireland, but are, on the contrary, it is to be feared, daily sapping the vitals and the strength of the empire. The establishment of these corps of yeomanry cavalry should be as follows : (26)—To be commanded by five gentlemen of property: one captain, two lieutenants, and two sub-lieutenants, and to consist of one hundred rank and file, composed of gentlemen, persons of independent income, or in trade; farmers and their sons, or near rela¬ tives, although not actually in possession of farms ; each master of a horse. The arms, appointments, saddles and bridles to be supplied by government; the clothes by them¬ selves. Their clothing should consist of a round hat with a narrow brim; a frieze coat, buttoning down to the waist, and waistcoat; a frieze loose coat, carried on the pummel of the saddle; leather breeches; boots coming well up to taught by the landlords themselves to look to becoming not “Yeo¬ men” hut Proprietors .] (25) [“ outcasts of mankind, §c .”-—Another bitter description of the British soldier, and all the more bitter that it is, generally speak¬ ing, terribly true; at least it is most true of the class who alone in Ire¬ land can be tempted to take what it was the fashion in 1843 to call * the Saxon Shilling!’] (26) [“ the establishment§c .—The system here suggested is framed according to the “ aristocratic” prejudices of the time ; these details, however, are, of course, quite arbitrary.] DEFENCE OE IEELAND. 39 tlie knees; a pair of strong ticken overhose, coining half¬ way down the leg; a straight one-edged sword, three feet from the pummel to the point, which must be sharp, in an iron scabbard,* 1 like that of the Austrian cavalry, hanging in a waist-belt; one long pistol in the left hol- * Wooden scabbards break, and leather ones shrink and become useless.— Author’s Note. [General Keating is quite under a mistake as to iron scabbards ; they blunt, and so render useless, even the best of swords. Captain Nolan (whose little work on cavalry tactics is the only good book on the subject in the English language) ener¬ getically condemns the English metal scabbard, and w armly advo¬ cates, for practical purposes, the wooden scabbards in which to his knowledge the gallant Sikhs of India preserved the edges of their blades (though often but old cast blades of English make and infe¬ rior steel) sharp enough to cut off English heads and English limbs at a blow in such charges as Nolan describes, and in which he him¬ self gained such chasacter in his profession. “When I was in India,” says Nolan, “ an engagement between a party of the Nizam’s irregular horse and a numerous body of insurgents took place, in which the horsemen, though greatly inferior in numbers, defeated the Kohillas with great slaughter. My attention was drawn particu¬ larly to the fight by the doctor’s report of the killed and wounded, most of whom had suffered by the sword, and in the column of re¬ marks such entries as the following were numerous :—‘ Arm cut off from the shoulder.’ 4 Head severed.’ 4 Both hands cut off (appa¬ rently at one blow) above the wrists, in holding up the arms to pro¬ tect the head.’ * Leg cut off above the knee,’ &c., &c. I was astounded. Were these men giants to lop off limbs thus wholesale ? or was this result to be attributed (as I was told) to the sharp edge of the native blade and the peculiar way of drawing it ? I became anxious to see these horsemen of the Nizam, to examine their wonder¬ ful blades, and learn the knack of lopping off men’s limbs. Oppor¬ tunity soon offered, for the Commander-in-Chief went to Hyderabad on a tour of inspection, in which I accompanied him. After passing the Kisna Eiver a squadron of these very horsemen joined the camp as part of the escort. And now fancy my astonishment! The sword- blades they had were chiefly old dragoon blades cast from our service. The men had mounted them after their own fashion. The hilt and handle, both of metal, small in the grip, rather fiat , not round, like ours , where the edge seldom falls true; they all had an edge like a razor from heel to 'point , and were worn in ivooden scabbards; a short single string held them to the waist-belt, from which a strap passed through the hilt to a button in front, to keep the sword steady and 40 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. ster (27), and four pistol cartridges in a magazine with the holster; in the other holster two horse-shoes and two sets of nails; a haversack with a stiff leather bottom, to use as a nose-hag, should he all their baggage. These corps should assemble on Sundays (28), after ser¬ vice, and on holidays, to practice moving in squadron, charging, breaking into hie, and forming squadron from that to right and left, front and rere. They should also practice the sword, &c., the manner of posting videttes, patrolling a country, escorting a convoy, repeating signals, breaking, dispersing and forming, and also learn how to cross an enclosed country. When an enemy is even in the country, these corps prevent it flying out of the scabbard. The swords are never drawn except in action “ Thinking the wooden scabbards ,” continues Captain Nolan, “ might be objected to as not suitable for campaigning, I got a return from one of these regiments and found the average of broken scab¬ bards below that of the regulars , who have steel ones. The steel is snapped by a kick or a fall; the wood , being elastic , bends. They are not in the man’s way; when dismounted they do not get between his legs and trip him up ; they make no noise—a soldier on sentry of a dark night might move about without betraying his position to an enemy by the clanking of the rings against the scabbard. All that rattling noise in column, which announces its approach when miles off, and makes it so difficult to hear a word of command in the ranks, is thus got rid of; as well as the necessity of wrapping straw or hay round the scabbards, as now customary when engaged in any service in which an attempt is to be made to surprise an enemy.”—(pp. 105, 107, of Cavalry, its History and Tactics; by Captain L. E. Nolan, 15th Hussars; London, T. Bosworth, 1853).] (27) [“one long pistol in the left holster .”—At the present day, of course, the weapon employed would be a “revolver,” or rather a “repeater” of Colt’s manufacture—a very satisfactory arm.] (28) [“ should assemble on Sundays .”—And surely if Ireland had her “National Guard” of Irish peasant volunteers, no better, healthier, more manly and becoming as well as innocent and rational recreation could be devised for the Sunday afternoon, after last Mass, in every parish, than regular public military exercise, and especially practise in the skilful use of the sword.] DEFENCE OF IEEEAND. 41 ought not to be called into the field. When embodied, there would he full use for them in their respective coun¬ ties, by employing them guarding magazines, convoys, assisting the quarter-masters and officers of stores in pro¬ viding forage and provisions, and in maintaining internal peace. They should do orderly duty, if in the field, and be also cantoned about the army, but not commanded but by their own officers. They would probably in general act in small corps of twenty-five each, commanded by a lieutenant. While these corps remain in their counties, an officer, resident in the county for the purpose, and appointed by government, should make quarterly in¬ spections of the troops, drawing the whole together for one day; this would give them a spirit of emulation; and he should report; the strength and state of each troop, and the condition of their arms and appointments, for which each captain should be answerable. When employed, they should receive a high pay, 2s 6d a day, and draw rations for themselves and horses. Such a corps would be inti¬ mately acquainted with the passes, roads, &c., of their respective counties, and would be invaluable sources of information for the generals. They could detect any treachery on the part of the country people (29), over whom, on account of the class from which they are drawn, they would have a much greater influence than any troops, solely military, could have. The pay seems high, but it must be made worth their while to quit their homes and occupations; besides, (29) [“ treachery on the part of the country people ”—This casual observation shows pretty clearly from what point of view Lieutenant Keating wrote. He is, in fact, speaking all along of an English Pro¬ testant “yeomanry” garrison of Ireland, and naturally takes for granted that the Catholic Irish “"country people” would sympathise altogether with the enemies of that garrison, from whatever quarter they might present themselves.] 42 DEFENCE OF IEELAKD. they could not in their way live as cheap, by forming messes, &c., as the military do. The evolutions of such a corps ought, as above stated, to be as simple as possible. Everything should be done by file. The squadrons to act on a small front. The formations from file may be simplified as follows, and which contains every possible formation:— The squadron should always file from the right, conse¬ quently have it in front. To form from file to the front, each man moves rapidly up on the left of his file-leader, and dresses to the right. To form to the rere, the leading file of front rank turns to the left about and halts, his rere¬ rank man covering him. Each file gallops on till they come on his left, then turn to the left about, close, and dress to the right. To form to the right, the right file turns to his right, the rest pass in the rere, turn to the right and dress. To form to the left, the whole have only individually to turn to the left, dress, and close to the right. These simple evolutions, with the charge, and wheeling in squadron, and going about by subdivision, are all that are necessary for such a corps to know, and this they might be taught in a week. A corps of Harlans (30), which were in the service of the King of Poland, answered very well the idea of a yeomanry cavalry, and their establishment might be with little variation adopted here. They were Tartars and Mahomedans. The gentleman served in the front rank, and carried a lance with a banderole, and a sabre; his servant covered him in the rere rank, armed with a carbine and sabre. The use of the lance for the cavalry is not sufficiently understood. Great advan¬ tages may be derived from it, either in the charge or pursuit. The Cossacks use them in passing rivers; (30) [ a Hulans.” —i.e., Hussars.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 43 they sound the depth of the water before them with the butt of the lance. Corps of peasantry (infantry) should be formed, of whom certainly, upon an average, four hundred could be found, who, under proper officers, might be entrusted with arms, in every county*. They might be formed in corps of fifty, each commanded by three officers, to wear their own clothings They should have a musket, without a bayonet (31); a pouch like the new magazines, to hold cartridges and balls, a powder-horn, and a sword two inches and a-half broad, straight and pointed, and two feet in length, handle included, in a wooden scabbard. This weapon is somewhat similar to that of the Homan Le¬ gionaries, and is useful in the attack of a post, intrench- ment, &c. They should not quit their county, and ought * A person who considers every grey-coated man as a Defender, will shudder at the idea of arming any of the Irish peasantry. Let such weigh well this calculation :—There must he at least twenty- three grand jurors in every county in Ireland; what description of people must these he, if twenty of that number are not of sufficient consequence and influence in their county, to produce among their friends, tenants and dependents, with their adherents, twenty men each, to whom they would entrust arms for mutual defence P If this calculation is just, the number required is completed. These corps should assemble for practice on Sunday and holiday evenings ; it would be an amusement, and tend to prevent idleness and debauchery. Where there is a police, the constables should be enrolled in them, and might act as subordinate officers.— Author’sNote. [“... shudder at the idea of arming any of the Irish peasantry —In 1795, as even in our own days, the English knew very well what to expect from an armed Irish peasantry, and they have ever since taken especial care (witness the prodigious number of Acts of Parliament passed with this sole object in view) to keep the Irish peasantry unarmed. The trusty u adherents” of the grand juror class in Ireland, spoken of by Keating, were, of course, the Orange yeomanry exclusively!] (31) [‘ ‘ without a bayonet.”— Certainly not; the arm now to be preferred would, of course, be a light rifle (such as the Enfield), with the sword described in the text fitted to be used as a bayonet at need —that is, just such an arm as at present used by the English Rifle regiments.] 44 DEFENCE OF IEELAND. to be commanded by persons to whom they are attached by interest. When on duty they should receive a shilling a day and their rations. They should be practised at firing at a mark*', covering and concealing themselves, always acting two together, the one not firing till the other is loaded; but they should never be troubled with any manoeuvre, either of tactic or parade, which always de¬ stroys the energy of the human faculties, and so far de¬ stroys the effect which ought to be derived from light troops. It will be right to consider, in case of an invasion, what will be the probable turn of mind of the people. Some of the peasantry would remain quiet spectators of the events of the war; some would join that party who seemed to bid fairest for success; others will join whoever invites them by an offer of plunder. Some governments are afraid to put arms in the hands of 'the peasantry, for fear they should turn them against those by whom they were intrusted with them. It is a vain precaution, be¬ cause if they are determined upon it, they will find the means of getting them from the scene of war. According to the disposition they seemed to be in; if they showed a good will to the cause, they might be attached to the army, form a chain of out-posts, get intelligence, &c. If they showed also a wavering disposition, they might be put at a considerable distance in the rere. They might also be employed to drive the cattle up the country, though this would be a precarious experiment. But then the question * Was this system of free corps of peasantry adopted, they might he invited to join the standard or ordered hack. If they were armed with pieces of a larger bore and greater length, to rest in order to take aim, the weight, as they have nothing else to carry, would not be of consequence, and they would throw a ball double the distance of the ordinary muskets.— Author's Note. [This was the weapon of the celebrated “ Shelmalier” marksmen of *98. But modern improve¬ ments in the rifle have quite'superseded the use of so cumbrous a gun.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 45 to be asked is, Can the soldiers be spared for that sendee at such a time ? In the year 1778, an invasion of England by the French was talked of. The instructions given by government were, that the army should drive the cattle up the coun¬ try, and the farmers and peasantry march down to meet the enemy on the coast. It is to be supposed they meant to arm them. Probably they did not choose to trust them to drive their own cattle, as supposing, if a farmer could get a better price for his sheep from the French, than he could from his own countrymen, he would prefer the former (32). Some of the depots they had fixed on were not five miles from the coast; they ought always to be farther than a possible day’s march: the cavalry patrolled from village to village, often out of sight even of the coast, in the idea of conveying intelligence of the ap¬ pearance of the enemy. Fixed stations of infantry, with signal staffs on the heights, are preferable. If either yeomanry, cavalry, or corps of peasantry, should be or¬ dered from home, their families should not be suffered to go with them, but receive a maintenance from the maga¬ zines ; they would be in fact a kind of hostage for their fidelity. It would be necessary to form corps of burghers, in the cities and considerable towns, under the municipal officers; they would not require clothing. In the time of danger, with proper encouragement, every housekeeper would as¬ sociate with his neighbours, for the mutual security of their properties. * It would, perhaps, be alleged, it is dangerous to do all this; these people are not to be entrusted with arms, be- (32) [!] * These are universally formed on the continent [under the name of the National Guard] ; they frequently are not clothed ; a man 46 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. cause they might use them against government. But, surely, the times are replete with danger; there is danger in every step we can take; and all prudence can do, is, to weigh these dangers well, and adopt the lesser. If you do not put (it might he said to government) confidence in the people, they will not put confidence in you. In the time of alarm they will associate with those, who can afford protection from the mob of the country. That protection the enemy will offer them; they will offer them arms if they were wanted, which they are not, for the country is full of arms. It is better, at all events, to assume the ap¬ pearance of confidence while it can be done, for sooner or later the people must ultimately be recurred to. Let us now suppose, what wilL [1795] be the probable consequence of a peace; trade will open between this country and France; the wants of the two nations are mutual; we want many things they have, and they want all the articles our country produces. Our ports would be filled with their shipping, and our country overrun with their people. Can it be supposed they will not im¬ port their principles ? It will be answered—but they must be kept down. It is just as possible to stop the pro¬ gress of time, as to stop the progress of thought; now that the people everywhere are beginning to discover may do his duty as well in a brown coat as a red one ; all parade is mere childishness, answering merely ad captandum vidgus. The most important posts in Paris are entrusted to the citizens. One would think that would convince those who can he convinced by any¬ thing, of the real state of the nation with whom we are at war [1795], As to the armed peasantry, it they are commanded by officers who understand that service, and, of course, to teach them (which they would soon learn) how to act, they would be as useful in the field, in such a country as this, as the best regulars in Europe. The peasantry in Brittany, of whom the Cbouans (so called from their war-cry) are a part, much resemble ours in the more remote parts, and we see what they were capable of doing; but they were com¬ manded by able officers.— Author's Note. DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 47 their own strength, it must be admitted that the few can¬ not govern the many, except by opinion.* * This has been called the Age of Reason, ho t it ought more pro¬ perly to he, of Reason ing —of Discussion and Investigation.*— Author's Note. CHAPTEK YIL SYSTEM OE DEFENCE BY COEDONS. (33.) The King of Prussia defends [1795] the Margrayiate of Erandenburgh, on the side of Saxony, by a camp at 'Wit- temberg; on the side of Hanover, by the post of Werben; which, as he observes, secures it. Poland recommends, for the defence of a river, when it is part of a cordon, small corps of two thousand men every five miles. This, with the reserves, would constitute a body of thirty thousand men, to defend fifty miles of front. His account of the battle of Cassano, and passage of the Adda, is very instructive. Lloyd says, the more extensive a frontier the easier de¬ fended, because those who attack can act on one line only, whereas those who defend can act on several. There is scarce a spot from which those who defend may not draw supplies, whereas those who attack can draw them but from one. An assailing army should endeavour to come (33) [‘ 4 System of Defence by Cordons * ’—The student must not by any means pay implicit deference to the opinions expressed by Gen. Keating in this Chapter. In the hands of a first-rate general the Cordon system may, indeed, often he made to work effectively ; but it is open to the serious objection that it divides the army of defence in such a manner as to risk the safety of the whole by exposing the base of operations to he carried by an active enemy whose whole force may be brought to bear suddenly upon that single point; and it is always dangerous in so far as it is likely to afford so many opportuni¬ ties to such enemy to overpower and destroy the several divisions in detail. If the defending army be so numerous in comparison with DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 49 to a decisive action; a defending army should avoid one, or endeavour to render it indecisive. The line of operations, is a line drawn from the point where your magazines, or subsistence, is collected. That which constitutes the ultimate object of your campaign, he your intention offensive or defensive, an invading army must choose the shortest time of operations; that of the defending army must he governed by the line adopted by the attacker. If the defending army occupies a pass in front of the attacker, the latter must send a corps in the rere of it. If this corps is not beaten, the defending army must retire. The best way of destroying an invading army, is by acting on its flanks. Before the system of defence is proceeded on, it is neces¬ sary to examine the possible routes for an enemy to take that of the enemy as to allow of an army of reserve of fully equal numbers to be held in hand in a central position, the cordon may, indeed, be garrisoned by the remainder; but that is almost the only case in which the 4 system’ advocated in the text can be held to be a safe one. In such a case the several detachments, however, will really only be outposts of more than ordinary strength. The Chap¬ ter is allowed to stand here, however, as a suggestive example of the author’s treatment of a military problem—and that, although the railway system of the present time, as well as other circumstances, so materially affect the data upon which General Keating’s detailed plan was founded—the rather that it contains many observations of much practical interest in connexion with the military strength of Ireland as a theatre of war. But it would be out of place to en¬ deavour here to explain the principles of the Art of War upon the basis of which alone a sound judgment can be exercised concerning the theory unfolded in the text. A careful study of either of Napo¬ leon’s Italian campaigns will readily supply even an ordinary reader with examples enough on the subject; and if he is disposed to go deeper into the matter he must be referred at once to the great text book upon the science of strategy, General Jomini’s Traite des Grandes Operations Militaires, in which a military history of the great Frederick’s performance in the 4 Seven Years’War’ is made the means of accurately analysing and defining the true principles and best practice of the Art, and see Appendix, post ,—at the end.] 50 DEFENCE OF IKELAND. to strike at the capital, which is we suppose the object of his attack. They are as follows:— Landing in Lough Foyle, 1. Strabane 2. Omagh 3. Augher 4. Monaghan 5. Cootehill 6. Kingscourt 7. Navan 8. Dublin Secondly, by 1. Enniskillen 2. Cavan 3. Athboy Thirdly, by Dungannon Armagh Dundalk From Sligo, by Carrick Mullingar From the Shannon, by Limerick Birr, or Maryboro’ i Eight days’ march (34) | Nine days’ march. # | Eight days’ march. Seven days’ march. Nine days’ march From Cork and the S. west, by Clonmel and^j Kilkenny, | or !> Ten days’ march. Cashel and | Durrow J (31) [“ Eight days' march”—“nine days' march” &c.—On the supposition, of course, of the absence of railway communication.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 51 From Galway, by Roscommon Lanesboro’ Cross the Shannon Mullingar, or by Athenry Athlone Cross the Shannon Kilbeggan, or by Loughrea Banagher orPortumna Cross the Shannon Portarlington Six days’ march. From this statement, it appears, that the line from Galway to Dublin, being the shortest line of operation, is that which it is most probable an enemy will adopt. We may suppose a probable attack to be made by the enemy, thus : That he has established himself at Galway, and advances on his line of operation towards Dublin. He advances to the Shannon, leaves an intermediate post at Kilconnel, and menaces Athlone, Banagher and Portumna, or Clonfert. This compels you to divide your force. He attacks one pass, penetrates and advances. We suppose a plan of defence by cordons. The first cordon embracing the capital, thus: 1 . 2 . 3. 4. 5. From that to The Boyne to Trim, Edenderry, Rathangan, Kilcullen, Liffey, Blessington, Bray River, Sea. This gives a cordon of sixty miles; the extremity of each flank being thirty miles distant from the centre; sup- 52 DEPENCE OP IRELAND. posing it defended by one army, posted at or near Eden- derry; the sea on each flank. SECOND CORDON. 1. Gore’s Bridge, 2. Kilkenny, 3. Roscrea, 4. Banagher, 5. Athlone, 6. Colehill, 7. Finae, 8. Kingsconrt. Three corps would be necessary on this, pour se donner mutuellement les mains. THIRD CORDON. 1. Cork, 2. Charleville, 3. Limerick, 4. Shannon to 5. Carrick, 6. Enniskillen, 7. Dungannon, 8. Newry. This is a line of twelve days* march (35), constituting the exterior cordon, of which the Shannon is a principal part of the frontier. This should be occupied by camps or cantonments, and is the grand line of operation, and that whereon the troops should remain until the enemy de- (35) [ a twelve days’ march’’ &c.—This observation is, of course, un¬ founded under the circumstances of the present time, for the reason, so often referred to, that if the railway communications be kept up there can be no difficulty in moving an army in as many hours , almost, as it would have required days in 1795. The movements of the French army in Italy during the late war (1859) must have made every one by this time familiar with the military uses of a modern railway,] DEFENCE OF IEELAND. 53 velopes his plans. This line would require the following force, thus distributed, viz.:— At Cork .. .. .. 4,000 men Charleville .. .1,000 Limerick .3,000 Athlone .6,000 Enniskillen .. .1,000 Dungannon.. .2,000 Newry .1,000 "With a strong advanced camp | 5 000 Galway .. Killaloe .’. 2,000 Portumna .. .2,000 Lanesboro’ .. .2,000 Carrick .1,000 30,000 Total. The reasons why it is probable an enemy would prefer Galway to any other of the possible routes, are, that those by the north, as well as by the south-west of the king¬ dom, are less capable of supplying his army; besides, that the face of the country presents much more difficulty to him, and would oblige him to proceed with more slow¬ ness and caution, than the route from Galway would require, which would be disadvantageous to him, in addi¬ tion to the line of operations being considerably longer. From Galway the country is more open. If he crosses at Lanesboro’, he has afterwards the Inny to cross, which affords a position. Eanagher is on a saliant bow of the river, and therefore capable of defence. Lloyd says, if a river runs along your frontier en¬ deavour to occupy two or three capital points on it, with good and extensive fortresses, so that you may not only cover your own country, but also make it impossible for an enemy to penetrate without giving you an opportunity of entering his, and cutting off his subsistence. 54 DEFENCE OF IEELAND. Of a river on a frontier he also says, though it be not navigable, it may be of great use in military operations, if it runs parallel to the frontier and crosses the principal roads, because it then furnishes good positions on its banks. An army cannot prevent the enemy throwing a bridge under the protection of his artillery, but it may prevent him from occupying such an extent of ground as is necessary for him to deploy, and may attack it in any part without being exposed to his artillery. An invading army requires the direct roads to be in good order, and the cross-roads broken. A defending army, on the contrary, should cause the direct roads to be broken, and the cross-roads made good. The centre of the cordons of defence, is one and the same with the point of the enemy’s line of operation, that is of course Dublin; the grand or exterior cordon being fully occupied with its due proportion of troops, and an advanced army stationed at Galway, which, for the reasons before and hereafter to be specified, is most likely to be the point of debarkation. Having fortresses fully garrisoned on the Shannon, and a strong garrison in the capital, with a camp of reserve between it and the grand cordon, and able to act upon either, the island may then, so far as the exterior enemy is in question, be considered as able to make a stand; for it would be presumptuous indeed to say, it was in a complete state of defence. The troops supposed to be destined for the cor¬ don, garrisons, &c., must be infantry and artillery, with small detachments of light cavalry to each corps or army; and hosts of the same along the coast, for which service 3,000 light cavalry would be sufficient; the remainder of the cavalry cantoned through the counties to maintain internal peace, which, reckoning three hundred in each county, a low computation, would take 10,000 more; the DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 55 garrison for the capital to he five thousand, and the army of reserve ten thousand. The number of troops, therefore, requisite to put this country in a state of safety, would thus amount to something less than sixty thousand men actually fit for the field. If the question is asked, why disperse your army in a cordon ?—keep them in great bodies, able to march to any point at a minute’s notice. To this it is to be observed, that it is only possible to guess where the descent may he made. They may threaten* five points at the same time, and it shall he impossible to the stations on the coast to tell which is the real attack, until they have absolutely landed. Suppose five expresses to government, from different quarters of the island, announce an enemy on the coast. Three of these perhaps are squadrons of fri¬ gates ; one an army of amusement, making a feint; the other the grand army. If the army for defence of the kingdom is in two camps, it is impossible that the army of the south could quit its station to act in the north, and vice versa . But even if it could be imprudent enough to do so on the first report, what would be the consequence ? The false attacks meeting no resistance would become real ones. But where are the magazines to maintain together a great force in one point ? How will they he supplied on the march ? Either you quit your magazines to meet * The French bring great numbers into action. Where a nation has such immense force of men, it is generally misapplied; they throw their numbers into such vast bodies, as to become unmanage¬ able. The true way of employing them to advantage has been dis¬ covered by the French, of dividing and attacking upon many points at once. This forces their enemy to divide ; he is of course inferior everywhere, and beaten in detail. It is never the interest of the smaller force to divide, if it can keep together. An army of forty thousand men may heat an army of eighty thousand, because that number cannot be brought into action. But divide them into four parts : the four armies of twenty thousand will invariably beat those composed of ten.— Author's Note. 56 DEFENCE OE IEELAKD. the enemy on the coast, or you remain in your central position (not being able to quit them), for the enemy are to come to you; in that case you are obliged to act on a cordon. Immediately on such intelligence as above com¬ ing to the seat of government, what would be the orders ? —not to march, but—report; a second report must be made, and how soon? by the time the enemy have actually debarked, and when they are formed on your coast. Then, indeed, comes the word, march! but in what form ? you meet the enemy on the coast if he chooses to wait there; if he does not, where do you meet him ? If it is not too presumptuous it might be said, it must be on some part of the cordon, as above laid down. You come to an action; if you beat him, you pursue him. Eut suppose it turns out otherwise, that he comes on you with superior force, or beats you, you must retreat to the second cordon, to the third cordon; concentrate your force there, if you can; if not, fall back on the capital. Eut if your armies are in two great corps, your maga¬ zines must be with them. If you march down then to the coast, your line of operation becomes longer than your enemy’s. Yet the whole of your magazines must follow, or you may be cut off from them. If you cannot keep the field, but must come to an immediate action for want of them, you do exactly what the enemy wishes. Your centre magazines would be much better supplied by sub¬ stituting smaller ones in different stations. It will be proved from experience, that the system of cordons has always been adopted, and when it has failed the fault was not there. The reason why the system of cordons is the best, are: First, your troops are easier maintained: Secondly, they are easier drawn together: Thirdly, their positions must be better chosen: and, Fourthly, that if the enemy, after being opposed in DEFENCE OF IEEE AND. 57 force on the cordon, succeeds and penetrates, he does not get at your magazines, hut you cut off his; for when he advances, the troops left on the cordon act upon the flanks of his line of operations, cut off his supplies, and harass his rere. If he defeats your army, your grand magazines fall into his hands; hut if they are detached upon the cordon, he cannot turn out of his line to seize them. That they are easier maintained, being dispersed at twenty or fifteen miles distance, than if they were assem¬ bled in a grand army at any one point, is pretty obvious. The reason why they are easier drawn together is this: their magazines are not confined to a point. Thus, for example, an enemy is in the west; orders come for the troops on the grand cordon to rendezvous at Athlone; the orders are issued, and the post is occupied as follows : First day, garrison consists of That day there arrives from Portumna .. Lanesboro’.. At Galway.. 6,000 men. 2,000 2,000 5,000 There are thus brought together in one day 15,000 The second day,—from Killaloe 2,000 ) „ Carrick 1,000 / d > 000 The third day from Dublin the army of reserve .. 10,000 \ Enniskillen 1,000 > 14,000 Limerick 3,000 ) 32 000 Thus 32,000 men are brought together in three days, There is no difficulty for forage, &c., as they find it at the several posts on their march upon the cordon. The same in regard to carriages; the roads, it is supposed, they must have in proper order, and be well acquainted with. The 58 DEFENCE OE IRELAND. army of reserve should be able to march, for instance, on at least two columns; the troops from the cordon, being fewer in number, might march on one. It would not he necessary for the magazines to follow, for this reason, that if there is at Athlone provisions for six thousand men (as there ought) for two months, there are provisions for thirty thousand for ten days; and during the interval of the enemy’s being on the coast, they should forage with large parties in the front of their cordon, and if possible reduce it to a desart. But if the army waits the advance of the enemy, whatever redundant forage is collected, should be sent back at least behind the second cordon, and not more than fourteen days’ provisions left with the grand army at one time. The troops on the extremity of the frontier, would at the same time close inwards. A detachment from Cork would occupy Limerick in three days, and from Dungannon to Carrick in the same period. If the grand army is beaten, those flank corps act upon the flanks of the enemy as he advances; and the defending army occupies the position previously ascertained on the second cordon, where its magazines are ready formed. It must be observed, that there are forced marches, but certainly not an unreasonable calculation, for an army freed from baggage, and the longest march not exceeding three days. The positions upon these cordons, forage, and roads, should be previously examined, and the state of forage both in front and rere reported. Where the roads are not good they should be repaired, and where wanting opened. The advantage also of a cordon is, that byretreating you concentrate your force; thus, if not strong enough to op¬ pose on the first cordon, call back all your troops to the se¬ cond. This will be further elucidated, by considering Dal¬ ton’s cordon, between the Elbe and Iser. DEFENCE OF IEELAND. 59 If the alarm is a false one, the troops are easily counter¬ manded. If the enemy lands on a flank, it of course takes double the time to bring the same number together; there¬ fore, the reserves should he stationed a portee of the weak¬ est part, and the flanks strengthened as much as possible; at all events, positions should be chosen in the rere to as¬ semble on. Wherever an action is to he risked, the de¬ fending army have it in their power to appoint the field, which is in front of their position. This they can turn to their advantage thus : if they are superior in cavalry, open the ground for 800 yards front of the flanks, and occupy it by the cavalry. If your army manoeuvres, give yourself room. If it is composed of troops that you cannot rely on in face of an enemy, occupy the hedges and ditches, taking care to cut intervals in them, hut always so that they are flanked with musketry. Break up all the passes, roads, &c., in front of your grand cordon, except what it is for your own convenience to keep. Always forage in front. Keep not more than fourteen days’ provisions in the magazines on your grand cordon ; from them also on your second, and send back all your re¬ dundancy there. The enemy will thus find nothing on landing. The advanced corps on the coast should never have more there than one week’s provisions in the maga¬ zines. Dalton occupied his famous position between the Iser and the Elbe, with twenty-six battalions and fourteen squadrons, forming an arc of upwards of a hundred miles, the mountains in his front, the curve towards the enemy. They were cantoned as follows: Reichenberg, 2 Battalions. Lagebruch 2 Bomish Ancher 4 Lebenau 2 Reicbstadt & ) o Leipee j Memes & Gabel 2 Leitnerity & Teschen 2 Seefersdorf 2 Penkraty 2 Remburg 1 Georgethal 1 60 DEFENCE OE IRELAND. The cavalry distributed by Greisdorf, Einsiedal, Ober andMeder Grand, were cantoned in the open country, and in the centre of his line; his infantry in the moun¬ tainous parts. Had he been attacked, his intention was to take a position between Reichenberg and the Jeschkow- berg As he fell back, he would have at the same time concentrated his forces. The King of Prussia said his po¬ sition was stronger than the citadel of Lisle By the ex¬ cellence of this cordon, the hereditary dominions are covered by 30,000 men effectually; but these points are all studied by the Austrian and Prussian officers, in time of peace, and when they go into the field, they are perfectly acquainted with the strong and weak part of every posi¬ tion. M. Catinatwas obliged, in 1692, to defend a greater frontier with about the same force, but failed for want of magazines and carriages. An army cannot be expected to act if deprived thus of locomotive powers. His line of defence extended from the Lake of Geneva to the Mediter¬ ranean. Two examples of passage of a river are selected, because they furnish an idea of the system of frontier war. The Prince of Conti, obliged to pass the Rhine, retired to his two bridges, a league below Worms, where the Rhine forms an elbow. He encamped at Hordheim, the brook Hoffheim to his right, the river Wirchnitz to his left, a part of his army thrown back along this river to the village of Yattenheim; he threw up detached redoubts, which supported each other mutually along the whole front, be¬ tween the two rivers, and some near the village of Bolstat, a quarter of a league in his front; five N. B.—Soldiers should learn to use shoes like the Croats, of un¬ dressed leather ; by which an infinite trouble in campaigns would be saved.— Author's Note. DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 61 redoubts were made round the heads of the bridges, and the enemy could not pass without first taking them. The baggage passed during the night. At day-break a corps of cavalry showed itself, formed at Bolstat, and the army crossed the Bhine. When the troops formed before Bolstat, who masked the retreat, began also to retire, they were har¬ assed by some irregulars, but being supported, retired in order to the redoubts, covering the bridges; these checked the enemy, and they were pursued and driven back to Bolstat. Here the superiority of redoubts over lines proved itself. The enemy could not have been pursued from the latter without the army’s defiling, by which a precious time would have been lost. Montecuculi wished to penetrate into Alsace by Stras- burgh, where also his magazines and bridges were. Tu- renne taking a position near that city, compelled it to a neutrality, and of course entrance was refused to Montecu¬ culi, but it was the latter’s object to remove Turenne from his position commanding Strasburgh; he therefore made a feint as if he meant to besiege Philipsburgh. It was also Turenne’s object to cutoff Montecuculi’s communication with Strasburgh, and thereby from his magazines and bridge. When therefore the latter moved towards Philips¬ burgh, Turenne threw a reinforcement into that place, and then crossed the Bhine, and occupied the strong camp of Yilstett, by which he carried the following great points : he cut off Montecuculi’s communication with his maga¬ zines, carried the war out of his own country, prevented any possibility of the enemy’s penetrating there, and ultimately obliged his adversary to fall back and lose the whole campaign, as effectually as he could have done it by the most signal defeat. This is a most instructive lesson, where the war is carried on upon great rivers which are not easily fordable ; 62 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. when that happens the business assumes a new face; and it is necessary to watch everywhere, the grand army re¬ taining a central position, a partie, to succour the whole. The scene of Montecuculi’s manoeuvres was about sixty miles in extent. CHAPTER VIII. ANOTHER PLAN. Another system of defence may be, by concentrating the great force of the kingdom at Athlone, and forming the military depot for the whole there, leaving garrisons of not less than 5,000 men in the capital, and in the north and west parts of the kingdom. In this case it would be necessary to have a large force in the county of Cork, as it would otherwise take six days’ march for an army, in case of an enemy landing there. Limerick also must be strongly occupied; but if Galway were threatened at the same time, the Athlone army would be held in check; while an army landing in the south-west could march di¬ rect by Clonmel and the Barrow, crossing that river and leaving it on its left for Dublin; the whole of which route the country is abundantly provided with all things neces¬ sary for its support. In that case, if the Cork army acts on the flank of the enemy, the Athlone army must fall back on Dublin. This gives an enemy, if in any force on the coast of Galway, an opportunity of landing and pene¬ trating to the Shannon; then the enemy’s two armies might effect a junction, as to a moral certainty; all the out corps must be called in, to form and defend the capital. If the grand army is attacked with a great force on the Leinster side of the Shannon, and at the same time with another force from Galway, its retreat is cut off; it can occupy no position, and must if defeated be destroyed, and the island conquered; therefore, it cannot in that case 64 DEFENCE OE IEEEAND. stay there, it must fall back to the third cordon; then all its magazines at Athlone are lost. If a central army marches to the south point of the kingdom, it cannot protect the Shannon, and if the Shan¬ non is ever gained by an enemy’s army of 40,000 men, all the forces of the empire will not dislodge it; nor could the army from the south fall back in time to protect the capi¬ tal. At any rate the magazines ought not to be formed at Athlone, but considerably in the rere. It is also certain, that take what position on the Shannon you will, if a hostile detachment lands either in the north or west, it is on your rere; you must either beat it or retire. Nor can a cordon be formed according to this plan; the communica¬ tion with the capital must be maintained by an inter¬ mediate post. Let the great position be where it will, Lublin must be maintained, in order to preserve the com¬ munication with England. This intermediate force must be strong, or it is nothing; if you make it strong, you so far diminish the force you oppose to the enemy. CHAPTER IX. ON CAMPS-POSITIONS—AND INUNDATIONS* The King of Prussia says, get good provincial charts and study them, impressing on the mind the names and situa¬ tions of cities, rivers, and chains of mountains. Having acquired a general idea of the country, proceed to particu¬ lars ; examine the direction of the roads, where an attack would he likely to he attended with most ease and success, and what force would be required; how far rivers are navigable, and where fordable; discover if they are dry in summer, or impassable in winter; observe the state of the lands, and what the general produce is; by what route an army can march from one city or river to another, and mark the best positions on these routes. Of plain and open countries we easily acquire an idea, of mountainous and woody with more difficulty, yet they must be known; ride into them with your map in your hand; take peasants, hunters, &c., with you; ascend the highest grounds, compare their answers with your map. Observe how many columns could march, or if it is possible to turn the enemy’s rere or dank. Mark where a defensive camp could be taken, but particularly observe the gorges, or debouchures. Revolve in your mind all the possible contingencies that can take place in those situations, so that if they become the seat of war, you may carry a clear impression of the whole in your mind. This must be done while you have leisure, and are unobstructed. 66 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. The following circumstances are required and absolutely necessary to a camp, viz., wood [fuel] and water. The front should he covered, and the rere open. The coup d’oeil consists in the following faculties; the first is, to judge how many troops will occupy a certain position, from examining it with the eye. The second, which is a much more arduous talent, consists in being able to seize at once (mentally) and decide upon every advantage the locality can give. [This talent practice can acquire and perfect.] An able general turns the smallest height, a hollow road, a ditch, to his advantage. The square of six miles will afford two hundred posi¬ tions, and no two alike. A general's eye at the first glance decides which of all of them is the best. Nothing is so difficult (says the King) as to defend the passage of a river for a considerable length. I would never undertake it if it exceeded fifty miles, or was ford¬ able. He remarks, that if you have a river in front, your field of battle must be within half musket shot of your position (36). The King of Prussia says, in choosing a position for a camp, to cover a country, it is not merely the strength of that position which is to be considered, but its relative situation; that is to say that it must not only be strong, but it must be so situated that, notwithstanding its strength, the enemy must attack it, in order to proceed upon his plans (37). It cannot be expected that such a ( 3 fi) [“ within half musket shot” &c .—It need scarcely be ob¬ served that since the date of the pamphlet (and the time of the celebrated King of Prussia) the improvements in fire-arms are such that the u half musket shot” of those days would not be much more than one-sixth of the distance which to-day might be described in the same words.] ( 37 ) [“ choosing a position for a camp ”—The principles upon which the position for a camp is chosen are so inseparably connected with the science of tactics that it would be impossible to make them DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 87 position should coyer every posssible road that the enemy could advance on; but it must command those which are most material to his grand design. It must he such a one, that in case of attack, the army which defends it must have no cause of apprehension, and that the enemy must have great doubt of his success; and also such a one that the enemy cannot avoid, without subjecting himself* to the greatest risk and inconveniency,—that he must make wide circuitous marches to avoid it, while I by small movements can anticipate him in all his attempts. The position at Nieustadt covers all Lower Silesia, on the side of Moravia, a frontier of a hundred miles; the river and town in front of the post. If the enemy attempts to pass between Ollmachen and Glatz, a movement be¬ tween INeufs and Ziegenhals cuts his communication off with Moravia; a camp between Schomberg and Lieban, guards Silesia on the side of Bohemia. An enemy cannot advance on the side of Cone, if I am posted between Troppau and Yagerndorff; if he does, his convoys are cut off (38). intelligible otherwise than by explaining the elementary principles of that science. The inquiring reader may be referred to the Cours de Tactique , par G. H. Dtjfour, (the present General-in-chief of the Army of the Swiss Confederation, formerly an officer in the service of the Great Emperor Napoleon, and the first authority in Europe during the last thirty years upon these subjects,) a little volume published by Cherbuliez, Paris, and Geneva; also to the Memorial pour les Travaux de Guerre, by the same author; and to M. XJrb ain’s Memorial des Camps, Arnhem, 1827 ; besides, upon the general sub¬ ject of Strategy, the great works of General Jomini. In the English language the best, if not the only valuable, book of reference is the Aide-Memoire of Military Sciences (“framed from contributions of officers of different services, and edited by a Committee of the Corps of Royal Engineers in Dublin, 1845 ”), published in six parts, or vols., by J. Weale, London, 1845-59 ; especially part I., vol. I. ( 1845 ), and part I., vol. II. ( 1848 ).—See also Appendix, post.] ( 38 ) [The examples in this paragraph, taken from the military positions of Frederick the Great, can only be understood by reference 68 DEFENCE OF IKELAND Positions are natural fortification. All that is requisite is the talent to see and to choose them. Prom the above example the following conclusion is to be drawn • that however necessary fortresses may he, and however ex¬ pedient it is for a nation to have its most important posts fortified, yet that they do not constitute the best or only defence of a country ; and that it is by manoeuvring armies, and able generals, that they are to be either conquered or defended. It is always prudent to intrench the camp in the neigh¬ bourhood of the enemy, taking care to leave many and large debouchures, that the movements of the army may not be cramped. No difficult ground should intersect a camp ; if there is any such, numerous passes ought imme¬ diately to be made over it. An army commands as much of a position as it is in reach of in an easy day’s march, on both flanks. If the enemy is ten miles in your front, you must be acquainted with his movements. If he marches to your right flank, you extend yourself in your position to your right; the position should always describe an arc ; the curve to the enemy. Two armies of ten thousand men each, will oc¬ cupy a country for thirty miles (39). If it is meant for a defensive position, break up bridges and roads in the front, and throw chevaux-de-frize, &c., in the fords, to make the advance on it difficult. If it is meant to march towards the enemy, open as many roads as possible, that to a good map of the country. With respect to these, as to all other examples taken from Frederick’s career, the diligent student will do well to refer to Johini’s Traite des Grandes Operations Militaires, the Atlas to which contains every thing needful to the study of the Seven Years’ War, and therein to the topography of the military ex¬ ploits of the greatest master of the Art of War in modern times, after Napoleon himself.] (39) [“ Two armies &c.—See Note (32), ante.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 69 the army may be put upon as many columns as its strength requires Always detach out-lying piquets and grand guards beyond rivers.' If it is near you, throw up works to defend the bridges or fords you leave passable, and oc¬ cupy the mountains with your armed peasantry, if you have them. The mountains of Ireland are not like those of the con¬ tinent, to which the King of Prussia alludes, as before quoted: they hear no campaign, therefore a foreign officer, reading of the mountains in this country would be quite deceived if he imagined them to be rough, rocky, covered with fine forests, producing grain, inhabited, and with narrow defiles. Ours are wild high wastes, boggy, and unfit for man or beast, but entirely open. The bogs in Ireland are sometimes insulated, and more frequently in chains. They seem to have been originally formed by the casual obstruction of some small stream of water, not of sufficient force to work a channel for itself, and stagnating in this moist climate, where the sun has not power to make it evaporate quickly, and where the tendency to vegetation is very great. A spongy substance forms itself, increases of course the stagnation, retains the moisture, and grows from year to year. Probably if the country were not inhabited, and the exertion of human industry opposed to this process of nature, in a few cen¬ turies all Ireland would be one vast bog. These bogs are, some more and some less, to a certain degree passable in summer for men, but unable to bear a horse or carriage. They have generally a very gradual fall, as the principle of their formation evinces, which is necessary to be ob¬ served, as their use in a military light in a great measure depends on this circumstance. They are generally sur¬ rounded, immediately at their edges, by elevated ground which commands them. 70 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. The more water is obstructed, the more impassable the hog behind it becomes, and where an army can have ground of this kind on its front or flank, it should en¬ deavour to render that part of its position impracticable, wherever a head of water could by means of dams he formed with most advantage. Ey doing it, these hogs spread to a very wide extent, and in parts contract very narrow. The narrowest point through which the stream runs should be taken for making the inundation, by throwing a dam from the projecting point of the high ground, on one side, to that on the opposite. This should he commanded, especially the lower side, by a work mounted with artillery, which should rake the whole of the embankment. It should be covered by chevaux-de- frize, an abbatis [of felled trees inrerlaced], &c., or strong pallisades; the hogs often supply timber of oak fit for this. If the fall is one yard in two hundred, which is a medium calculation, an embankment of this kind twenty-one feet high, will inundate the position for near an English mile; but it would render all the hog behind it impassable, by its absorbing the water, and become too wet to bear a man, especially if assisted by rains. Our rivers are generally small, hut with strong hanks, therefore of great consequence in military operations. No river is so deep or so wide, as to he relied on for security; it must still be guarded. They are the most certain features in the face of a country; they mark the ground for military operations, and are in nature what scales and degrees are on a map. If an army occupies a position, a river is most advantageous on its front; if an army is in march, on its flank. A dry season may render a river passable where it never was; sometimes fords are not known except to very few. No river is so large, that it ought to be considered im- DEFENCE OF IEELAND. 71 passable; nor none so small, that advantage may not be drawn from it. Any mill-stream may be turned to tbe purpose of inundation. The greatest position afforded in Ireland, is the west bank of the Shannon; another presents itself from Ma¬ guire’s-bridge to Charlemont in the North. One might also be taken from Portadown to Newry; also from Bel- turbet to Carrick. Prom Kilkenny to Nenagh affords a chain of positions of a great extent. Every position that it is possible could ever be required, should be previously examined; its advantages and dis¬ advantages noted down; the points to be fortified marked; the quantity of artillery and troops it would require entered down, that at a minute’s notice it might be occupied; if it is to be fortified, the peasantry on the arrival of the officer of engineers might be immediately set to work, in case of invasion. Instead of bat horses, two-wheeled carriages should be ordered for the conveyance of the troops’ baggage; they should be so constructed that they could be taken to pieces, and carried over difficult passes; as also, in case of a horse sinking, that they might be put on others. It would be advisable to have flying corps, composed of ten companies of grenadiers or light infantry, with four field pieces, and a squadron of light dragoons; they would be advanced in front of the grand army; they ought to be disencumbered of all unnecessary baggage, and carry an additional number of rounds of ammunition. Every man should have a blanket large enough to cover his head and feet, and a watch coat made as light as possible*. * The shoes of undressed leather, used hy the Croats, might be adopted to great advantage by our military, if they only used them on marches. The consumption and expense of shoes is inconceivable. In that case every man could make his own. All that is requisite is 72 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. Gunboats on the lakes and at tbe entrance of the Shan¬ non would be of use. If two armies execute flank movements, each on their respective positions, in order to pre-occupy a post, pass, &c., and one has a greater length of march to perform than the other, that disadvantage must be got over, either by making the road more easy, or so that a greater front may march on it; or, secondly, by turning the attention of the enemy, by a diversion on some other point, and so concealing your movement, unless there is a sufficient force to be able to detach cavalry to harass his rear, or light infantry to intercept him at a defile. Whichever army occupies the pass first, the other cannot force it in his presence, nor can the occupier, al¬ though so far master of it, attempt the passage in the face of his adversary, without the greatest precaution. The advantages of high ground for positions, are, that the enemy’s movements are all open to you, while yours are concealed from him. In case of an attack, he is ex¬ posed to the fire of your artillery and musketry, while his has little effect on you. If an army has an enemy in front, and advances, it must open roads; but in flank marches, three roads are all required. If there is but one made road, that should be reserved for the bag¬ gage, and other roads should be opened for the two columns. These flank roads should be marked out on the army’s coming into its position; they should be wide enough to admit a company in front. When an army marches into a country, where it has not had time to prepare the roads, for example, in five columns, each column will have its guides in front, who, by camp colours, will mark out the route of the column, ft piece of undressed hide, which he cuts to the shape of the foot; it laces from the toe to above the ankle.— Author 1 s Note. DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 73 according to the directions of the quartermaster-general; the pioneers follow the guides and level the road for their column; the baggage should, if possible, march on the high road. The army ought to have so many roads open in rere of its position, as in case of necessity to be able to retreat on six columns. CHAPTER X. DUTY OF OFFICERS. When an officer, of what rank soever, arrives at his post, he should come provided with the best general and local maps he can procure. If it is on the coast, he should also get a chart of it (40). These he should compare with the ground, examine what depth of water there is, how high the tide rises, where shipping would command the shore, and where they would he commanded by it. He should examine all the roads, passes, rivers, fords, moun¬ tains and positions, calculate their distances by his computation—for instance, by the time he takes in going from one to the other. He should ex¬ amine the state of the country as to forage, take the number of mills, how much they usually work, and what they have in store; inquire where corn and other articles of provision are kept; what fairs there are, and whence the cattle are brought. He should cultivate acquaintance with the people of the country, and endeavour to find out their temper and disposition, in order to be able to answer inqui- ( 40 ) [ u the best general and local maps,’’ &C.-^In Ireland there is no longer any difficulty about Maps and Charts. The Ordnance Survey Maps give every thing ; those of the Geological Survey (an inch to the mile) give even the elevations pretty well. The military engineer needs but roughly sketch in the hills and hollows, and other features remarkable in a military point of view, on the large scale Townland Survey sheets. The “ Duty of Officers” shortly described in this chapter refers to the case of the officers of a strange army in an enemy’s country only.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 75 ries, and point them out to his superiors. He should be on horseback constantly, when not on other duties; ex¬ amine things with his own eyes, and not trust to reports. If there are no maps of the country, he must compute the distances of towns, roads, rivers, &c., from rough maps from his own calculations. Where there is a posi¬ tion, he should measure the distance of the neighbouring heights by paces, and see if it is commanded; this know¬ ledge, previously acquired, will give him confidence in a time of danger. In time of harvest he should calculate how much corn of all sorts is in the country, and inquire whither it usually goes. Fuel is an essential article; he should inquire what stock there is of that, and if there is a sufficiency for troops in case of being put in winter cantonments. All this inquiry is necessary to possess an officer with that general and miscellaneous knowledge, without which he never can be of use. If he is in an advanced post he must be cautious not to give any unnecessary alarms, to impress the public with an idea of extraordinary alertness; and not trans¬ mit a report till he has examined into the foundation of it himself. The following anecdote of the great Gustavus Adolphus, transmitted to us by Prince Henry of Prussia, strongly authorises the principles here laid down. His words are:— “ II dit, (Schildknecht officier d’ingenieurs) que le Mo- narque Suedois etant au camp de Beerwalde, avoit pro- jette de s’emparer d’un defile, pour surprendre les Impe- riaux dans leur camp. Mais que comme il ne se fioit jamais aux cartes gravees & qu’il etoit impossible d’aller reconnoitre le terrein parceque l’ennemi Toccupoit, cet ingenieur en fit le plan d’apres le rapport des habitans, & le presenta aux Eoi qui dirigea sa marche en consequence, 76 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. mais l’armee, ay ant d’arriver au defile, se trouva tout d’un coup vis-a-vis d’un marais qui n’etoit pas marque dans le plan de l’ingenieur. Ce marais pouvoit etre defendu par l’ennemi, & couter beaucoup de monde aux Suedois. Le Eoi rebroussa chemin, & traita fort malle pauvre Schildknecht, qui assura sa Majeste que le plan avoit ete fait sur le rapport d’un vieux gentil- bomme & d’un ecclesiastique du lieu. Eb bein, dit le Eoi en plaisantant, suivez ces braves gens, & faites vous montrer ce marais pour n’en pas tromper d’autres.” (41). ( 41 ) [“He said (Schildknecht, an officer of the engineers), that the Swedish Monarch being at the camp of Beerwalde, had designed to possess himself of a certain defile, in order to surprise the Impe¬ rialists in their camp. But that as he never placed confidence in en¬ graved maps (that is, those of the time), and as it was impossible to reconnoitre the ground since it was occupied by the enemy, this en¬ gineer made a map of it according to the report of the neighbouring inhabitants, which he presented to the King, who directed his march accordingly; hut the army, before reaching the defile, found itself all on a sudden in front of a marsh, which was not marked at all on the engineer’s map. This marsh might be defended by the enemy, and might have cost many men to the Swedes. The King retraced his steps, and spoke to poor Schildknecht very harshly; who assured his Majesty that the Map had been made on the report of an old gentle¬ man and of an ecclesiastic of the neighbourhood. ‘Very well,’ said the King, laughing, ‘ follow these good people, and make them show you the marsh, so as not to lead any one else into such a mistake/ ’*] CHAPTER XI. ON THE INTEENAL SITUATION OF THE COUNTBY. If you have no great magazines, and live only from day to day, and the people of the country are ill-affected to you, and cut off your daily and casual supplies, what becomes of the war ? If a country is in a state of defence, there should he a year’s provision in advance in the mili¬ tary magazines. If there is not a sufficiency wherever the army comes, they or the people of the country must starve. The consequence of starving is desperation and pillage. What kind of foraging parties must you then send out ? There is no country where*a good understand¬ ing between the army and country people is so necessary as in Ireland. At any rate your magazines ought to be formed this year for the ensuing one. Suppose you are obliged to take the field in March or April—such a thing is impossible—where is your com, potatoes, or fuel? Where forage for your cavalry before August? These are serious considerations, and no one thinks of them. The generality of people imagine all that is necessary for an army to take the field, is to have canvas to cover them (42). (42) [It is plain that General Keating in this paragraph speaks only of an English army in Ireland. If an English army were looked on as friendly to the people it would he different. So in case a French army should chance at any time to he welcomed as friendly to the people of Ireland it would be still more different for them.'] 78 DEFENCE OF IEELANB. The business of maintaining an army, so as to keep its operations unclogged, is a science by itself. It must be considered, that in an emergency, the country will be charged cent, per cent, more than the value. Whatever is bought in the country might he paid in government debentures; small ones might be struck off for that pur- pose (43). What is the loss of ten sail of the line and two hun¬ dred transports to the Trench, compared to getting pos¬ session of this country ? It is to be hoped government will see the consequence of it in due time. In four days from the appearance of an enemy on the coast, it is possible for them to be in possession of all Connaught, and probably a considerable part of Ulster. Imagine the situation of this country with forty thousand French on the west of the Shannon, and ten thousand from Belturbet to bTewry. If our forces advance toward Connaught, the French army of the north is in their rere; if against the north, the army of Connaught is on their left and rere (44). Immediately on landing, the enemy would most pro¬ bably publish a proclamation, offering indemnity and security to all who staid at home (45), and inviting the coun¬ try people to bring provisions to his camp. This would open a communication between them, and facilitate his means of procuring intelligence. If he found the people of the (43) [“ paid in Government debentures ”—During the late war in Italy it is a notable fact that the French army paid for everything its full value in gold.] (44) [“ on the west of the Shannon —As has been already ob¬ served times are so changed since Mr. Keating wrote, in 1795, that an army of 50.000 men could now land anywhere, and could be in the centre of Leinster, or before Dublin itself, as quickly and as easily as at that time it could be at Galway or at Newry either.] (45) [“ indemnity and security —An invading army “of libera¬ tion” would offer even more, and would take measures to give prac¬ tical proof of its sincerity at once.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 79 country ill-affected to the government (46), he would deliver out arms to them, and take them in pay, form pioneers, free corps, &e. Probably no inducement could make an Englishman act in concert with a Frenchman; such is their antipathy. There is, as yet, no affection between the two nations here, but there certainly is no antipathy to the French (47). Any one who has seen the wealth and happiness of the Dutch and Flemish peasantry, and afterwards seen them run over to their invader, will he apt to inquire if there are any peculiar circumstances in the case of the Irish peasantry which will induce them to adopt a contrary conduct. If they are not more wealthy, more happy, and more independent; if they are not more attached to their laws and government; if they have not more reason to he so, is it probable that they vail adopt a contrary conduct ? The Flemings certainly lived under a happy go¬ vernment, and had no reason to dislike the house of Austria. Every well-wisher to his country ought to con¬ sider these points in time; in the moment of danger it is too late, and we must at last recur to the peasantry for protection.* (46) [“ ill-affected to the Government .”—It appears Lieutenant Keating (who was, indeed, but a Munster u Papist” after all) was able to form a pretty good guess as to the dispositions of the people of Ireland towards an invading army. But it is to be remembered the invaders he contemplates are always the French.'] (47) [ u no antipathy to the French .”—It would be but strange in¬ gratitude if there were—and we know that for the idea of “ ingrati¬ tude” there is no expression known to the Irish language.] * The planters in the West India Islands are obliged to adopt the desperate resource of arming their negro slaves, and our men of pro¬ perty are afraid to trust their own tenants I If this is the case, can anything be more desperate than our situation ? The French, when their country was invaded, armed the whole people, and the people did not betrav their trust. II ow wretched then must be the situa¬ tion of those, who are afraid to recur to such an expedient, and with what face will they attempt it, when it can be no longer 80 DEFENCE OF IEELAND. One cannot but be surprised, that the importance of this country should have struck the world in general so little of late years. Previous to the independence of America, it was an obscure spot at the extremity of the old world, and would probably have remained so, had America continued to be peopled only with savages, ignorant of navigation, and consequently incapable of coming forward in the great theatre of the human race. America has as yet much to do at home; probably it will be many years before she will begin to show all her greatness in action, before she will have her due weight in the political balance of the world; but if their progress increases in the same proportion that it has done, and there is every reason to think it will do ev6n more, they will probably cause a revo¬ lution in the affairs of the world, in which these coun¬ tries will participate more deeply than any other (48). Ireland, situated between the two continents, is, not¬ withstanding the misfortunes of six centuries, now in¬ creasing in wealth, in civilization, and population. Happy would it be if the two former kept pace with the latter; but, unfortunately, the drain of the upper classes of the people and their money to England, is such as prevents the country’s deriving all or near the advantages nature and the times hold out to her. It is to be hoped, that the connection between the two countries will be ever main¬ tained (49); yet this war (50) England seems to have avoided.— Author’s Note . [When France was invaded France be¬ longed to the French .] (48) [“ America . her due weight in the political balance of the ivorld.” —How just was the expectation of the writer (in 1795) events have pretty well proved many years before the present.] (49) [‘‘. ever maintained.” —Had not the author been a British officer we might suppose such a conclusion, from what imme¬ diately precedes it, could only have been ironical!] (50) [“ this war.” —The war against the Great French Revolution, 1793.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 81 ^either despised the power of Prance too much, or it relied too much on the natural strength of Ireland; or, finally, it was not aware of its consequence; for it was left by her in what may in the most unqualified manner he called an absolutely defenceless state. Ireland contains about five millions of people of all de¬ scriptions, of whom the poor are at least four million seven hundred thousand (51). Ey poor is meant, not farmers and tradesmen, but those who are obliged to work to earn their sustenance from day to day. One reason for this great proportion of poor is, that every man marries. In most other countries people do not, unless they have some prospect of a maintenance for their families. It were to be wished that in this country, property and indepen¬ dence (without a certain degree of which mankind will not be at rest), were more diffused. It is true men are never to be satisfied. A monarch who possesses dominions larger than the rest of Europe, finds that a spot of her neighbour’s territory lies convenient, and seizes it. Here is no stimulus of want, but merely the love of acquisi¬ tion that Providence has implanted in the human mind. Can it then be wondered at, if what is commonly called the mob, that part of society composed of all that is wretched, all that is outcast, and all that is hopeless, should turn upon the property of their wealthy neighbour, when an opportunity offers. If it is said they were bom and are used to their situation, that is the language of unfeeling folly. That country is wretched , indeed , where ninety-nine in every hundred see and feel that no change , no revolution , can possibly make them worse or more miser- (51) [ u Ireland contains ” &c.—The description in this paragraph was true enough in 1795. It will probably be generally recognised as equally true, at least in the main, to-day. Certainly the hint contained in the last two sentences (printed above in italics) is quite as much in point to-day as ever it could have been.] 82 DEPENCE OP IRELAND. able than they actually are. From such a state of thinking they must look with anxiety for a change. Where the inhabitants of a country are disunited among themselves, that country cannot enjoy security. All pa¬ triotism is smothered in the effervescence of private ani¬ mosities and the most destructive passions. Such, happily, is not the state of England; nor will it anywhere else add to the strength or security of her empire. England for many years engrossed the trade and wealth of the universe, without a rival, and founded her splendour on it; but it is not in the nature of things that it can be always so ; trade will in time find its level, and all cannot be gainers. Should England decline, in proportion to her decadence, the value of Ireland to her increases, the attachment of Ireland should also increase, united by situation, lan¬ guage, manners, and common interest (52). Such a band ought to be indissoluble. The best way to perpetuate it is by endeavouring to convince both nations—that is to say, not the few but the great mass of both that they are benefited by the connec¬ tion ; and let not the multitude be despised by the rich and great. It is that the rich may enjoy ease that the poor man labours; and for their security that the poor fight and bleed. In the hour of danger and distress, the great, the powerful, and the wealthy, must throw them¬ selves for protection on their poor neighbours, for their lives, their families, and their properties. It is therefore the particular interest, not of the poor but of the rich, to endeavour to make the cause of the nation a common one. If it is alleged that the lower orders will not believe the arguments adduced in such a question, still the prin- (52) [“ attachment ; band. . . . indissoluble ”— Irony again!] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 83 ciple is undeniable, and it is an additional reason against procrastinating the only security of the rich until the hour of danger—it is then too late. And it will be well for those who have power to re¬ member, that if the poorer classes are the people, it is for the happiness of the people that power has been delegated to them; that a national cause is not the cause of the few but of the many (53). La Jacquerie was the name given to a most dreadful civil war, with which France was once scourged. It was an insurrection of the peasantry, owing to the oppression of the nobles. The Hungarian peasantry in their last insurrection, to which they were goaded by every species of oppression, committed dreadful excesses, shutting up the nobility in their castles, and setting fire to them, &c. Horiah and Kloskar were delegated by the peasants to present their petition to the Emperor. Horiah was a man of great talents. It is reported the answer of the Emperor was in the following words: ‘ 4 It is all your own fault .’ 9 Poland has neither strong ground, nor rivers, nor for¬ tresses ; its people are dispirited by their state of vassalage; they are treated everywhere with indignity. A postilion exercises his whip on every unfortunate peasant with im¬ punity, who is not able to get out of his way in time (54). They are abject, unprincipled, drunken and licentious. (53) . [These two paragraphs are very well put by Mr. Keating; nor are the examples which follow in the least degree out of place to-day any more than in 1795.] (54) [“ exercises his whip on every unfortunate peasant with impunity” &c.—It is not fifteen years since (I860, now,) we knew of such a case in a populous locality in the rich county of Cork, and the outrage went unpunished by the poor serfs that suffered it. As if in retribution, the rich Earl has even since then been beggared, and lives a miserable pauper on lands which it is to be hoped may never again be possessed by one of his race.] 84 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. Haying no security for property, they have no business to acquire more than sustains them from day to day; and their nobility are under no tie to treat them well. Yet when the country was invaded, the defenders of it were headed by tradesmen (shoemakers) of Warsaw, and the nobility did not then disdain their station or their as¬ sistance. There is something so extraordinary in the following, that the translation of it, from the original German, may not be unacceptable: “ War must be carried on, either in our own, or in a neutral, or in an enemy’s country. If I had no view but to my own glory, I would always prefer making my own dominions the seat of war. As there, every man serves for a spy, and the enemy cannot stir a step without its being known, I can then send out large or small parties without apprehension, and make any movement I please without risk. If the enemy is beaten, every peasant be¬ comes a soldier and harasses the enemy. Of that the Elector Frederick William had experience, after the battle of Eehrbellin, where the peasants killed more of the Swedish soldiers than there were slain in the action; and the same circumstance happened to me after the battle of Hohenfriedberg, where the mountaineers of Silesia brought in a multitude of Austrian prisoners. Where the country, which is the seat of war is neutral, that party always has the advantage which is able to obtain the good will of the people. In such a situation the strictest discipline must be observed, and plunder and marauding severely punished. “ The enemy must be charged with the worst designs against the country. If it is Protestant, profess your¬ selves on all occasions the defenders of the Protestant re¬ ligion, and trumpet forth in the hearing of the lower DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 85 orders of the people, whose simplicity is easily imposed on, the strongest sentiments of religious fanaticism. If, on the other hand, the country is Catholic, your conver¬ sation must run on the propriety of universal toleration in matters of religion; profess the most moderate sentiments, and lament that priestcraft should have caused such dif¬ ference between mankind, who are all agreed in the main principles of Christianity. “ In regard to detachments, &c., all that must be en¬ tirely regulated by the knowledge you acquire of the good or ill disposition of the country people toward you. From the untolerated religious sectaries assistance may be de¬ rived ; the gentry, let them pretend what they will, will betray you, so will the clergy. Eut the great ground on which to put yourself is religious fanaticism. If I can once succeed in exasperating a people, on the score of liberty of conscience, and can persuade them that they are oppressed by their clergy and gentry, you may rely on them. I call this bringing heaven and hell on my side. Taxes afford a good ground for agitating the people’s minds; persuade them that in case of a change of govern¬ ment they would be taken off,” &c., &c. It is necessary to observe that the foregoing instruc¬ tions are not written by a Democrat; but that though they contain traits of the most sublime Jacobinism, they are a part of the ninth article of secret instructions of the great Frederick of Prussia to his officers; of Frederick the King, Hero, Legislator, and Philosopher; the goodness of whose heart, unchanged by greatness and prosperity, was equally conspicuous in his personal friendships and his regard for the happiness and prosperity of his dominions. And it also appears hereby that the French have not the merit of having discovered this new system of setting the world in a flame, and shaking established governments, 86 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. as has been attributed to them, and which they arrogated to themselves. When such measures are adopted by a character, to whom they are so uncongenial, as that above-mentioned, it only proves, that men’s actions and principles are de¬ termined by the situations into which fortune throws them. Every suggestion which is here laid down, as proper to instil into the minds of the subjects of a hostile Sove¬ reign, is equally applicable to those of that Monarch from whom they proceed; yet because the measure answers the emergency of the moment, it is adopted without any fear of a future retribution. CHAPTER XII. ON FRONTIERS IN GENERAL-ON DESCENTS, AND PASSAGE OP RIYERS. The passage of rivers is so much connected with the de¬ fence of frontiers, and there is such a simplicity in the conduct of a descent, and the rules to be followed in the former case, that the two subjects of consideration may be, perhaps, not improperly thrown together. Since countries, as Poland, have no frontier that admits of de¬ fence, as has before been observed, to defend the mar- graviate of Brandenburgh the King of Prussia advances and takes possession of Wittemberg; why ? because Bran¬ denburgh is a flat open country, and not defensible, except at Wittemberg. Portugal has a weak frontier, because all the chains of mountains and all the rivers run at right angles with it, of course, parallel to the line of operations* of the invader. Whichever way rivers are observed to run by the map, it may be inferred the mountains and positions also run. In Alsace they are favourable to defend the country, and the French knew how to take advantage of them. The sea is the frontier of England and Ireland, and the first defence, the British navy; but no statesman or soldier would risk the existence of the nation under his care upon one security. Notwithstanding the superiority of our navy in every respect, there exists a possibility of France 88 DEFENCE OF IKELAND. being, at a future day, equal or superior (55). If France made a descent on this country, she would not consider what became of her transports. It is much to be regretted Mr. Pitt’s plan of fortifying the dock-yards in the Channel some years ago was not carried into effect. It is sur¬ prising that the good sense of the English would not see how much cheaper they might be defended by militia, in works of earth, than by sailors in ships of war; or the absurdity of first fitting and manning a ship for sea, and then being obliged to keep her rotting in harbour to de¬ fend the dock-yard. The superiority of the English navy is not from exclusive resources, but from its having very naturally, on account of its situation, turned its attention early to the sea, and, in consequence, having got the start of the rest of Europe. But America and France have as good ports, as much timber, and may one day have as much trade. Had Louis the Fourteenth, instead of main¬ taining four hundred thousand men in arms on earth, turned his thoughts to the sea, the navy of France might have been as powerful now. For these reasons it is to Jbe wished more attention were paid to the defence of our coast. A chain of telegraphs from the north, from Galway and Bantry,*to the capital, would be very useful (56); If a river is the frontier, and must be passed in face of an enemy, the following rules must be adhered to as close as possible, viz., choose a rentrant angle, your banks higher than the opposite ones, and place batteries on each flank. The night is also often a favourable time. What (55) [“equal or superior .”—Mr. Keating’s anticipation appears to be now jnst on the point of being realized, if indeed it is not actually realized already.] (56) [“ A chain of telegraphs &c.—At the present day, of course, the Electric Telegraph is everywhere.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 89 Marshal Saxe says of intrenchments, may be applied to what we have read of the passage of rivers, sometimes they succeed, “Parceque la tete tourne aux hommes quand il leur arrive des choses aux quel ils ne s’atteu- dant pas”—the passage of rivers often succeeds, because it is not imagined that it will be attempted. The best way to defend a river, says Maizeroy, is to have corps detached along it at certain distances, but near enough to join at the point of attack. The usual precau¬ tions to be taken in guarding a river are to break up fords, destroy boats, watch the most likely places—namely, where the river forms a bend towards the enemy, and where another river runs into it on the enemy’s side, by which they might send down pontoons, floats, &c. Where there are islands raise redoubts on them, and mount cannon. Of descents, Maizeroy says, retrenchments to guard against them are not only useless but dangerous. So many places admit of a debarkation, it would be unneces¬ sary to intrench the whole coast. The enemy will not present himself at a guarded place, except as a feint to divert. Every time the English descended on the coast of France they did it with the greatest ease. All that can be done is, when the intention of the enemy is evident, assemble troops as soon as possible, they being, it is to be supposed, previously arranged for the purpose, and ad¬ vance toward the enemy. If he is in the act of landing, he should be attacked without deliberation, and without heeding the prodigious fire of the covering fleet, which is not to be dreaded by troops on the shore and in move¬ ment ; and once they come to close action, the enemy can make no more use of his fire. If you find him landed and in force, occupy some advantageous post, where he may be detained till the arrival of all the troops. If he 90 DEFENCE OF IEELAND. means to establish himself in the country, he will come in great force, unless he expects to find them disposed in his favour. Redoubts upon a coast, if they have not cannon in them, are useless. As the enemy may disembark at low water, they should be made en barbette (57), and placed so as to have a cross fire. It is right to have points of appui and railing, fortified up the country. It appears that Maizeroy speaks only of the smaller sort of attacks. He adds the following important observation. The de¬ fence of a country does not consist in the number of for¬ tresses, but in the zeal of the people, well-regulated finances, disciplined troops, and the facility of augment¬ ing them whenever necessity requires. The manoeuvres our [English] troops are taught, only serve to give them false ideas. Maizeroy says, to train troops, enterprises of small importance must be under¬ taken—Mais il faut prendre garde de s’y faire battre. A good rule. * The French failed in their attempt on Sardinia, because they landed a very inconsiderable force, because the peasantry rushed down armed upon them, and because they took panic. They were defeated at Sallee, because they came up the river in their boats with the tide; when it ebbed they were left sticking in the mud, where they were assailed by the Moors and Arabs, and, unable to defend themselves, they were cut to pieces by them with their short swords. These are two strong instances of what a peasantry can do.— Author's Note. (57) [en barbette .”—A battery u en barbette ” is one in which the guns are mounted not in embrasures , under cover, but upon an open platform on the top, as in the Martello Towers on the Irish Coast.] CHAPTER XIII. ON THE PRESENT STATE OF DEFENCE OF THE COUNTRY-THE FORCE, AND PROBABLE DISTRIBUTION OF IT-AND ON THE EXPENSES AND NECESSITIES OF THE CAMPAIGN. The forces in Ireland may be estimated at upwards of thirty thousand men, of whom twenty thousand might be brought into the field, in different parts of the kingdom. Probably ten thousand might, in case of an attack, be assembled. There is no train of artillery fit to take the field, equal to the exigencies of the country, nor are there magazines formed. It is supposed the cavalry could not take the field for want ot forage. There is (58) a squadron of men-of-war at Cork. It is supposed the troops will be encamped in small corps of five thousand each; one near Dublin, one in the South, and one in the North. For the transporting magazines, &c., the troops are entirely dependant on the people of the country, having no carriages attached to the army for that purpose, which is one inconvenience (59). There is no corps of pontoniers, on which account the army could pass rivers but on one column. It has been already observed, there are no fortresses in the coun- (58) [“ There is ”—Theresas [1795], and of course there might be.] (59) [“ Transporting Magazines” §c .—These remarks, like all the other observations of the author respecting the communications and means of transport, were, of course, only true before the completion of the existing Railway system.] 92 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. try; there are also few engineers; nor have the military been in the practice of breaking ground. If it were possible that the whole army could assemble to oppose the enemy, and leave the country without troops to maintain internal peace, protect their magazines, com¬ munications, &c., such an army could not continue a month together for want of provisions. An army of twenty thousand men, with their follow¬ ers, the necessary horses, and adding only the small pro¬ portion of one thousand regular cavalry, would consume eighteen thousand barrels of corn, of all descriptions, every four weeks ; besides this, it must have turf, straw, hay, and cattle. It would require fifteen thousand sheep, or two thousand head of black cattle also monthly; and would thus consume in that space of time, the produce of four thousand acres of land, and in the course of the campaign of upwards of twenty thousand acres, amounting in value to upwards of two hundred thousand pounds. An army of a nominal forty thousand men, which to a certainty would not bring more than twenty thousand into the field, would cost while there, the first campaign, half a million sterling. If forty thousand effectives are neces¬ sary for the defence of the island, sixty thousand must be rated as the strength of the army, the additional expense may be calculated. The camp equipage, and the year’s stores beforehand, would require a sum of two millions to put this country in a tolerable state of defence. One million must be added for fortifying posts; and the casualties and contingencies, even the article of blankets, of which there must be a hundred thousand in store, comes to a large sum, and if the army are in the field, must be renewed every year. A less sum of money than four millions sterling, in the national treasury, would not be sufficient to carry an army DEFENCE OF IRELAND, 93 through the first campaign. Twenty thousand men would require near two thousand horses, of all descriptions, in order to move from place to place. Government should have a hundred thousand barrels of corn in store in the country for the use of the army. When the late General Edward Dalton, marched to the Low Countries, at the time the Emperor Joseph II. [of Austria] threatened Holland, his army was fed from the opposite side of the Rhine ; a severe frost rendered it un- navigable, and when the supply of bread was exhausted, there was no remedy, but to disband the army, with orders for every man to shift for himself. These orders were actually to have been issued on the ensuing day, but a thaw fortunately occurring during the night, and again opening the communication, prevented the total separation of the army taking place. CHAPTER XIV. FINANCES-TAXES-REVENUES. If the French were to get possession of this country, they would probably act here, as they have done elsewhere— would respect private property, but rob the public trea¬ sure. The revenue they would seize here, are what originate from taxes, and those of the church (60). Reckon the Hearth Tax at .. .. .. £50,000 per annum. The County Presentments amount through the kingdom, to not less than .» .. 100,000 (60). Tithes and Church Revenues, .. .. 450,000 £600,000 Asumof money equal to the maintenance of 30,000 troops. Suppose all these taxes were, during the present war (61), given up, and instead thereof two shillings an acre on all arable and pasture land, laid on, to be expended in the defence of the country, deducting also for the public roads, necessary salaries, ecclesiastical and others. The goodness of our roads is a great misfortune; it would facili¬ tate in the greatest degree the conquest of the country. "Why should money be expended in making roads and (60) [“the church — (i.e., the Protestant Church Establishment). This Chapter is allowed to stand only because it is so short; it is in many respects inapplicable now. There is now no “ Hearth-tax and the “ County Presentments” amount to a million a-year, or ten times the sum named by General Keating.] (61) [“ the present war .”—In 1795, namely.] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 95 building bridges, when we do not know how soon we must break them up ? It would only be necessary to re¬ tain a tew of the principal ones. It would be better for the opulent classes at once to contribute liberally, by a free gift for the defence of the country ; for what would the enemy probably do, if they gained a footing here; they would abolish, by a mani¬ festo, all the above-mentioned taxes, which fall in this country solely on the poor, and instead of it lay a general tax on all property. They would be sure in such a measure to have the voice of the people with them.*' There are many other taxes from which revenue is drawn, but the above are what come particularly out of the pockets of the people ; and an exoneration from which would be most particularly felt and applauded by them. It must be admitted, that such a change in the system of any country is a very strong measure; those certainly ought never to be recurred to but in times of the greatest danger. People who think that is now the case, will probably be also of opinion, that it is now necessary for our own security, to be at least prepared to adopt some¬ thing similar, if affairs do not very soon take a new turn; if they do not , there is no alternative in case of an attach , but submission ; for if the spirit of the people is not roused in their own defence , if they are lukewarm and indifferent , it is impossible for the country to be defended by any army . There is no great hope from the convulsions in Prance; it is now [1795,] a great military Itepublie, and will always be equally formidable externally, because its force is derived, not from the casual ability of a military King or * Tithes are in great part lay property. In whatever way the money is levied, the clergy must be paid. Nothing here must he understoo i as trenching upon the maintenance of that body; but tithes, though a tax, are a transferable property.— Author’s Note . [The author was certainly a prudent spoken u Papist.”] 96 DEFENCE OF IRELAND. a great Statesman, but from the spirit which pervades the whole mass of the nation. Probably France may ultimately fall as Rome did, but it is likewise probable she may be in the meantime equally victorious. Rome fought with nations, which, though barbarous, breathed a spirit of patriotism, and where unanimous against the invader ; but the French may say with Shakspeare, 4 ‘ We have met with foes who strike beside us.” CHAPTER XV. MISCELLANEOUS OBSERVATIONS. An enemy’s army of 50,000 men would consume in the various articles of the produce of the soil, as much as would amount weekly to upwards of three thousand acres. These articles of subsistence must be obtained, either methodically, through the means of the constituted autho¬ rities of the country, which would be attended with least misery, or by means of pillage. "Whatever a re tiling army may do, it is impossible an advancing one could sub¬ sist a day upon the wild system of rapine. An invader’s object is to get possession of the country as soon as he can; but this is not done until the seat of government is in his power. Let him have what footing in the country he will, until he gains that, the vital prin¬ ciple remains unextinguished, and the body will perform its functions. Dublin as the capital and seat of govern¬ ment, would of course be the object of attack. But there is an additional reason; it would be necessary for them to gain the east coast of the kingdom, fortify Dublin, Drogheda, &c., and there form their frontier against Eng¬ land (62). (62) [“ necessary ” fyc .—That is supposing the invaders were not provided with a N avy of sufficient force; or, wanting an overwhelm- 98 DEFENCE OF IKE LAND. Previous to Lord Howe’s action with the French, though both fleets endeavoured their utmost to come to it, they were three days in sight of each other, without being able to do so. This proves the uncertainty of our reliance or security from the sea. What might not have been effected by a fleet of transports during that time ? If this country became the theatre of war, whichever party had the advantage, Ireland would he trampled to pieces in the struggle (63). A very few individuals make by war ; the country which is the seat of it is beg¬ gared (64). Perhaps it would be well that the Irish mob knew a vic¬ torious army, as well French as any other, suffers no people to pillage hut themselves; the existence of a conquering army depends on the security of property, which it will always protect, in order to plunder it at leisure. On the appearance of the enemy on any part ot the coast, the cavalry should immediately drive all the cattle and everything moveable, behind the grand cordon (65), and destroy everything which they could not remove. In short, all between the grand cordon and the enemy should be made a desert; but the people should be indemnified. It is evident, nothing but the last necessity should induce such strong measures; but in such a case it is always done, and is unavoidable. ing force at sea, were not provided with, an army sufficiently powerful effectually to resist every attempt that could be made by the English to effect a landing in force. If the population should turn out to be friendly to an invading “army of liberation” the case would, of course, be still stronger in its favour.] (63) [“ trampled to pieces ”—Not exactly ; now, at all events!] (64) [“ beggared”— No longer now, in these days of short and de¬ cisive campaigns.] (65) [“the grand cordon .”—See Chapter VII., (and see also Note 33,) ante .] DEFENCE OF IRELAND. 99 In a system of defence possibilities and not probabilities alone must be guarded against Sometimes an enemy will not attack in the part we think probable but on the contrary, where we think impossible. But it is a weakness to suppose anything impossible to an active enemy. To recapitulate in a few words that which is necessary to put this country in a state of defence : the first article is money: secondly, officers. An army fully equipped, with its equipage, field ar¬ tillery, corps of pontoniers, staff, and hospital properly appointed; this army to consist of forty thousand effectivi men (infantry), and two thousand cavalry, a corps ol engineers well acquainted with the country, and a full year’s provisions beforehand of all kinds of stores, with a train of carriages and horses, to enable troops, artillery, &c., to move, without being at the mercy of the people of the country. Lastly, we should have unanimity among ourselves* Our army consists of disjointed corps, unused to the sys¬ tem of acting in great bodies; nor is there any proba¬ bility of a regular organisation of it taking place. In addition to this, the regular troops only enter it on the east side, to embark from it on the west. Manoeuvres in great bodies are unknown to our trooops* Parties of cavalry should never be sent out in this country, except sustained by infantry. It is unfortunately too true, that those men who de¬ spise danger most, when at a distance, have the strongest sense of it when it is at hand. Courage may be the effect of constitution, but it is reflection gives firmness* Let every person of property just resolve seriously in his mind upon what he would do, on hearing an enemy 100 DEFENCE OF IKELAND. was landed in the country, and in force; and remember what Marshal Saxe says : Que ia Ute tourne aux homines , quand il leur arrive des choses aux quels ils ne s’attendoient pas. APPENDIX NOTE On certain Military Principles useful for the better UNDERSTANDING OF GENERAL KEATINGS TREATISE. [From the French Text Book : “ Memorial des Officiers D'lnfan- terie et de Ca