! 630.7 I6b no, 765 cop. 8 Ubrary Maf """' UNIVERSITY ILLINOIS LIB AT URBANA-CHA AGRICULTU The person charging this material is responsible for its return to the library from which it was withdrawn n or before the Latest Date stamped below. Th, mutilation, and underlining of books are reason, tor discipli- nary action and may result in dismissal from the University To renew call Telephone Center, 333-8400 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 1 3 L16I 0-1096 Sorghum Movements i~ in the United State Interregional Flow Patterns and Transportation Requirements in 1 977 N'ack N. Leath. Lowell D. Hill, and Stephen W. Fuller North Central Regional Research Bulletin 272 Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 250 Illinois Bulletin 765 Agricultural Experiment Station 'College of Agriculture University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign -^P*^^ ABSTRACT The marketing of sorghum in the U.S. involves complex interregional grain movements. Moving the crop from its highly concentrated production region to points where it is used or exported requires a large transportation capacity. To provide a basis for policy and investment decisions, detailed information on sorghum movements during 1977 was collected from 3, 500 grain merchan- dising, processing, and exporting firms in 41 states. Survey data on receipts and shipments for each state or substate area were expanded to represent total volumes for those areas and were verified by comparison with infor- mation from secondary sources. The data, which represent the most compre- hensive and accurate information available on sorghum movements, are presented and summarized in this bulletin. Keywords: Grain flows, grain shipping, grain transportation, interregional analysis, sorghum, sorghum marketing. Sorghum Movements in the United States Interregional Flow Patterns and Transportation Requirements in 1977 Mack N. Leath, Agricultural Economist, Economics and Statistics Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture Lowell D. Hill, L. J. Norton Professor of Marketing, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Stephen W. Fuller, Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University North Central Regional Research Bulletin 272 Southern Cooperative Series 250 Illinois Bulletin 765 Agricultural Experiment Stations of Alabama, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin, and the United States Department of Agriculture cooperating. The participating agricultural experiment stations and government agencies provide equal opportunities in programs and employment. January 1981 This publication is sponsored by the Agricultural Ex- periment Stations of the following states, by the Science and Education Administration Cooperative Research (SEA-CR), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and by the Economics and Statistics Service (ESS), USDA. Participating state Alabama Arkansas California Georgia Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon South Dakota Tennessee Texas Wisconsin Experiment station director G. A. Buchanan L. O. Warren J. B. Kendrick, Jr. W. P. Flatt R. J. Miller R. G. Cragle B. R. Baumgardt L. R. Kolmer F. W. Smith C. E. Bamhart D. Chambers S. H. Wittwer R. J. Sauer R. R. Foil A. M. Lennon J. R. Welsh R. G. Arnold H. R. Lund R. M. Kottman C. B. Browning J. R. Davis R. A. Moore D. M. Gossett N. P. Clarke L. M. Walsh This publication reports the results of research con- ducted by three regional technical committees: Southern Regional Committee S-115 on Alternative Structures for Increasing Efficiency in Intra- and Inter-regional Grain Marketing Systems; North Central Regional Committee NC-137 on Evaluation of Alternative Rural Freight Trans- portation, Storage, and Distribution Systems, and North Central Regional Committee NC-139 on Economic Anal- ysis of the U.S. Grain Exporting System. The following state Agricultural Experiment Station representatives, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) staff members, and U.S. Department of Agriculture personnel comprised the technical committees. SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE S-115 Alabama J. L. Stallings* Arkansas W. R. Morrison, E. J. Wailes* Georgia R. F. Anderson,* M. R. Holmes Illinois L. D. Hill* Indiana B. F. Jones Kentucky M. R. Reed, D. M. Shuffett* Louisiana N. C. Clark, H. D. Traylor* Mississippi W. L. Bateman,* T. D. Phillips Ohio E. D. Baldwin, J. W. Sharp* Tennessee C. B. Sappington* TVA W. J. Free,* L. E. Stone ESS, USDA T. Q. Hutchinson,* M. N. Leath* SEA CR, USDA L. C. Halvorson Administrative Adviser T. J. Whatley (Tennessee) NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL COMMITTEE NC-137 Illinois L. D. Hill* Indiana J. K. Binkley* Iowa C. P. Baumel* Kansas L. O. Sorenson* Michigan S. R. Thompson* Minnesota R. P. Dahl* Missouri R. K. Rudel* Montana W. W. Koo* Nebraska D. G. Anderson* North Dakota D. W. Cobia* Ohio D. W. Larson* Oklahoma M. A. Johnson, R. L. Oehrtman* South Dakota C. E. Lamberton* Texas S. W. Fuller* Wisconsin R. H. Vilstrup* ESS, USDA L. A. Hoffman,* L. D. Schnake, D. L. Watt SEA CR, USDA L. C. Halvorson Administrative Adviser D. E. Anderson (North Dakota) NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL COMMITTEE NC-139 California A. F. McCalla* Idaho J. R. Jones* Illinois L. D. Hill* Indiana B. F. Jones* Iowa G. W. Ladd* Kansas L. W. Schruben* Minnesota R. P. Dahl* Missouri R. K. Rudel* Montana G. L. Cramer* Nebraska D. A. Linsenmeyer* North Dakota D. E. Anderson, W. W. Wilson* Ohio J. W. Sharp* Oklahoma R. L. Oehrtman* Oregon M. V. Martin* South Dakota A. C. Sogn Texas M. L. Cook* ESS, USDA A. R. Bunker,* R. E. Friend,* C. B. Han- rahan,* B. H. Wright* Federal Grain Inspection Service, USDA F. F. Niern- berger SEA CR, USDA L. C. Halvorson Administrative Adviser H. J. Schweitzer (Illinois) The following state Agricultural Experiment Station personnel also cooperated in the research: Arizona T. F. Archer Pennsylvania S. K. Abshire Colorado W. T. Spencer H. L. Moore Connecticut S. K. Seaver South Carolina S. E. Miller Florida J. K. Dow Maine D. D. Harlan Maryland J. L. Crothers New York M. E. Brunk North Carolina T. E. Nichols Utah R. H. Anderson Vermont N. T. Power Virginia D. E. Kenyon Washington K. L. Casavant Wyoming J. S. St. Clair * Voting member and project leader for the participating organi- zation. Preface The research reported in this bulletin is the first effort ever made to survey grain shippers and receivers nationwide; it is the most compre- hensive study of grain movements ever conducted. Members of the technical committees, including representatives of Agricultural Experi- ment Stations in 25 states, assisted in conducting an industry survey to collect flow data for wheat, corn, soybeans, sorghum, oats, barley, and rye. In addition, surveys were conducted in 16 other states through contracts with 15 universities located in those states. The industry sur- veys were coordinated by Lowell D. Hill, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The data were tabulated and summarized under the supervision of Mack N. Leath, Economics and Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. The success of this research project is due to the cooperation of thousands of grain marketing firms and the efforts of researchers in the many par- ticipating states. The research was funded in part through contract DACW 72-78-C-0005 with the Institute of Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Supplemental support was provided by the Federal Railroad Adminis- tration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Maritime Admin- istration of the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation. Administration of grant funds was coordinated by Lowell D. Hill, University of Illinois at Urbana-Cham- paign. Contents Introduction 1 Purpose of Study 2 Methodology 2 Verification of Data 3 Overview of Movements 7 Receipts and Shipments by Area 13 Tables 1. Sorghum Supply and Distribution in the United States for Marketing Years from 1970-71 to 1979-80 1 2. Production, Farm Use, and Sales of Sorghum by State for the 1977 Crop 3 3. Export Regions, Port Areas, and the Ports Included in Each Area 5 4. Comparison of 1977 Sorghum Receipts, Shipments, and Inspections for Export at Various Port Areas 6 5. Comparison of 1977 Waterway Movements of Sorghum in the U.S. as Reported by Survey Respondents and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6 6. Comparison of 1977 Rail Movements of Sorghum as Reported by Survey Respondents and as Estimated from the 1 Percent Waybill Sample in Selected States 7 7. 1977 Intrastate Shipments of Sorghum for Each State and Mode of Transportation 8 8. 1977 Interstate Shipments of Sorghum for Each State and Mode of Transportation 9 9. 1977 Interstate Receipts of Sorghum for Each State and Mode of Transportation 10 10. 1977 Movements of Sorghum to Points of Export for Each Originating State by Three Modes of Transportation 11 11. 1977 Receipts of Sorghum at Port Areas by Each Mode of Transportation 12 12. 1977 Exports of U.S. Sorghum by Export Region and Destination 13 13- 103. Sorghum Receipts and Shipments by State and Substate Areas 14 104- 115. Sorghum Receipts and Shipments by Port Areas 54 Figures 1. Sorghum Harvested for All Purposes Except Sirup, 1974 2 2. Location of Grain Flow Study Regions 4 3. Patterns of Sorghum Flow to Domestic Destinations, 1977 8 4. Patterns of Sorghum Flow to Port Areas, 1977 11 5. Proportion of 1977 Sorghum Movements to Export Regions from Each Originating State 12 Sorghum Movements in the United States Interregional Flow Patterns and Transportation Requirements in 1977 INTRODUCTION Information about the origin and destination of grain produced in the United States and about the modes of transportation used to convey it is important for many policy and investment decisions. Although data on the quantities of grains shipped abroad from each port are available and statistics on the amount of grain shipped on the inland waterways are published annually, little information is available that can be used to match ori- gins with destinations and to identify the mode of trans- portation used. Through personal interviews with over 3,500 grain merchandisers, processors, and exporters throughout the United States, data on origins, destinations, and transport modes have now been assembled for corn, wheat, soybeans, sorghum, oats, barley, and rye. This publication summarizes the data for sorghum. Other publications in this series provide similar information for the other grains. Sorghum is the second most important feed grain pro- duced in the United States. Annual production has gen- erally exceeded 700 million bushels in recent years (Table 1). During the 1970s the amount of sorghum used for human consumption declined from 3 million bushels to 1 million bushels, and the quantity used in alcoholic beverage production averaged about three million bushels annually. The amount used for seed is almost totally a function of the acreage planted; it has accounted for about 2 million bushels annually. The major domestic use of sorghum is for livestock feed. The usage for feed varies greatly from year to year in response to changes in the relative price and supply of sorghum as compared to other feed grains. The annual usage for feed generally exceeded 500 million bushels during the 1970s. The most dramatic growth in the demand for sorghum has been in the export markets. Export shipments of sorghum in- creased from 123 million bushels in 1971-72 to an estimated 350 million bushels in 1979-80. Sorghum requires a large volume of transportation because it is grown in a highly concentrated production area and because the very large export demand is fo- cused on only a few ports on the Gulf of Mexico. The production of sorghum is concentrated in the Southern Table 1. Sorghum Supply and Distribution in the United States for Marketing Years from 1970-71 to 1979-80 Marketing year" Supply Disappearance Begin- ning stocks Produc- tion Total Food Ale. bever- ages Seed Feed and re- sidual Exports Total millions of bushels 1970-71 244 683 927 3 4 3 683 144 837 1971-72 90 868 958 2 5 2 685 123 816 1972-73 142 801 943 2 2 2 652 212 870 1973-74 73 923 996 2 3 2 694 234 935 1974-75 61 623 684 1 3 2 431 212 649 1 975-76 35 753 788 1 3 2 502 229 737 1976-77 51 720 771 1 3 2 428 246 680 1 977-78 91 793 884 1 4 2 473 213 693 1978-79 191 748 939 1 3 2 566 207 779 1979-80" 160 814 974 1 4 2 496 325 828 " Beginning October 1. b Estimated as of October, 1980. Source: Feed Situation, Economics and Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (various issues). Figure 1. Sorghum harvested for all purposes except sirup, 1974. 1 Dot = 5,000 Acres U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of the Census Great Plains where rainfall is usually inadequate for corn and soybean production (Figure 1). The area of con- centrated production extends from southern Nebraska to the Texas gulf coast. The leading states in sorghum production are Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and Texas (Table 2). In 1977 these four states produced 688 million bushels of sorghum, 87 percent of the total U.S. produc- tion. About 32 percent of all the sorghum produced in the nation was used for feed and seed on the farms where it was produced, and about 62 percent was sold from farms. PURPOSE OF STUDY Analysis of grain flow patterns can reveal the geo- graphical nature of grain markets and the type of trans- portation services required by the grain industry. This information is useful to grain firms in identifying addi- tional marketing opportunities and in making decisions about where to locate new handling, storage, and pro- cessing facilities. Of equal importance is the value of this information to those who set federal and state trans- portation policies. The formulation of rational grain transportation policies depends upon knowledge of existing grain flows and associated transportation modes. In many situations, firms or public agencies make deci- sions affecting the production, storage, and transporta- tion of grain without adequate information about grain distribution patterns and the demands that those deci- sions will place on the various transportation modes. The objectives of this study were: 1. To determine the volume of sorghum moving be- tween various origins and destinations 2. To determine the extent to which the various trans- portation modes are employed in the movement of sorghum in the U.S. METHODOLOGY For the purposes of this study, the United States was divided into 132 numbered regions and 31 ports, as shown in Figure 2. Data from the 31 ports were aggre- gated into 13 port areas located in four major export regions. The specific ports included in each port area are listed with their identifying numbers in Table 3. Sorghum flow data were collected for the 1977 calendar year primarily through personal interviews with repre- sentatives of grain handling, storage, and processing firms in 41 states. The firms from which data were obtained included country elevators, inland terminal elevators, river terminal elevators, feed manufacturers, export elevators, commercial feedlots, and processing firms. A representative from each state's Agricultural Experiment Station was responsible for drawing the sample and conducting the interviews. The sampling of inland grain elevators in the particu- lar state was carried out by listing the elevators in de- scending order of storage capacity. Starting with the largest, elevators were added to the sample until the total of their storage capacities was equal to at least 25 percent of the inland elevator storage capacity in that state. Not less than 10 percent of the remaining elevators were then selected at random. For river elevators the procedure was simpler: a minimum of 50 percent of the elevators were selected by random sampling. Feed manufacturing firms in each state were arrayed on the basis of their production capacity. Starting with the largest, feed firms on the list were added to the sam- ple until the total of their production capacities equalled or exceeded 10 percent of the total feed manufacturing capacity in the state. Ten percent more of the remaining firms were then selected at random and included in the sample. All exporters and processors were included in the interviews.* Data based on random samples were expanded in proportion to the sampling rate to convert the data into estimates for the entire region or state. The same types of information were gathered from all the grain handlers and processors interviewed. Each firm was asked to identify the volume of grain that it received from each region and the volume that moved by each mode of transportation. The firms were also asked to identify each region or port area for which their shipments were destined and the quantity shipped by each mode. Experiment Station representatives verified the accu- racy of the data collected, expanded the sample data to state totals, and delivered the summary data for each grain and for every substate region to the U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture for processing. As receivers' and shippers' data were tabulated, the Experiment Station representative in each state checked any discrepancies to identify potential data errors and to arrive at a single number for each origin-destination pair. Insofar as pos- sible, the state representatives checked data to ascertain that they were consistent and logical. VERIFICATION OF DATA The accuracy of the data on the volume of sorghum shipped between the various origins and destinations by each mode of transportation was verified by several direct and indirect comparisons with data from other sources. One indirect check was made by adding re- ceipts to the surplus or deficit! to obtain the supply Table 2. Production, Farm Use, and Sales of Sorghum by State for the 1977 Crop State Production Used on farms where produced Sales Alabama thoust 729 inds of bushels 576 720 2,228 964 2,201 511 2,212 550 1,279 89,910 1,058 264 276 31,908 36,742 2,117 1,385 8,588 154 7,899 816 57,600 387 153 6,480 10.876 8,672 5,952 161 1,884 620 1,089 153,090 766 396 492 35,982 110,228 9,643 1,279 12,882 38 8,908 204 172,800 43 Arizona 7 200 Arkansas 13104 California 9 636 Colorado 8 1 53 Georgia 672 Illinois 4 096 Indiana ... 1 170 Iowa . 2 368 Kansas 243 000 Kentucky 1 824 Louisiana 660 Mississippi 768 Missouri . 67890 Nebraska . 1 46 970 New Mexico 11 760 North Carolina 2 664 Oklahoma 21 470 South Carolina . . South Dakota . . . 1 92 16807 Tennessee 1 ,020 Texas 230 400 Virginia 430 U.S. Total 792 983 250,345 542,638 * Only one major processor did not provide data for the study. Data on receipts by that firm were estimated from information furnished by shippers. t The surplus or deficit for each state was calculated by adding the 1977 production to the stocks in all positions as of January 1, 1977, then subtracting the amount used for livestock, processors, and seed and deducting the stocks in all positions as of January 1, 1978. Source: Field Crops: Production, Disposition, Value, 1977-1978, Economics and Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, CrPr 1 (79) (April 11, 1979), p. 6. available for shipment from each state. Exact correspon- dence between the supply and reported shipments was not expected since the data on sorghum consumption by livestock and processors were based on estimates. Any major discrepancies, however, were investigated to verify that they did not indicate significant errors in the survey data. A second check on total volume was made by compar- ing total receipts at each port with official data on in- spections for export as published by the Market News Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Table 4). Because there were few opportunities for either set of data to miss significant volumes, these numbers com- pared very closely. Discrepancies between receipts and exports at some of the port areas were explained by ship- ments to domestic destinations from export elevators, shipments to processing plants located in the port area, and changes in inventory. Supplemental information about grain shipments on inland waterways was provided by the U.S. Army Corps I >% o 1 c "5 01 I ci & u. Table 3. Export Regions, Port Areas, and the Ports Included in Each Area Export region and port area" Ports included in the general area Area number Export area Port number Port city Great Lakes Region 7101 Duluth-Superior 2750 Duluth, MN Superior, Wl 7102 Chicago 2164 2165 2166 2246 Milwaukee, Wl Manitowoc, Wl Racine, Wl Chicago, IL 7103 Toledo 1845 0751 Toledo, OH Huron, OH Erie, PA Buffalo, NY 7104 Saginaw 2067 2068 Carrollton, Ml Saginaw, Ml Zilwaukee, Ml Detroit, Ml Atlantic Region 7201 North Atlantic 0101 0755 0958 Portland, ME Albany, NY Philadelphia, PA 7202 South Atlantic 1122 1224 1544 Baltimore, MD Norfolk, VA North Charleston, SC Gulf Region 7301 East Gulf 2570 2641 Pascagoula, MS Mobile, AL 7302 Louisiana Gulf 3149 3169 Mississippi River Lake Charles, LA 7303 North Texas Gulf 3742 Beaumont, TX Port Arthur, TX Houston, TX Galveston, TX 7304 South Texas Gulf 3759 3760 Brownsville, TX Corpus Christi, TX Pacific Region 7401 Columbia River 4562 4652 4663 Kalama, WA Longview, WA Vancouver, WA Portland, OR Astoria, OR 7402 Puget Sound 4547 Seattle, WA Tacoma, WA 7403 California Ports 4753 4754 4755 4756 4757 Sacramento, CA Stockton, CA Long Beach, CA San Francisco, CA San Diego, CA * These port areas will be used in this report to avoid disclosure of data from individual firms. 6 of Engineers. Since these data were based on the actual bill of lading for each shipment they were, in principle, a complete census of all barge shipments. As Table 5 shows, the survey data and the Corps data on state-to- state shipments on inland waterways correspond closely. Differences between the two sets of data can be ex- plained by (1) a significant number of shipments for which the origins and destinations are noted as "un- known" in the Corps data, (2) changes in the destination of a barge after it left the loading dock, (3) incomplete reporting of loadings to the Corps of Engineers, and (4) reporting errors by survey respondents. The size- able shipments from Minnesota in the Corps data sug- gest that errors may be present in recording the type of grain being shipped since sorghum is not produced in that state. The last method of validation provides important in- sight into data available from the U.S. Department of Transportation that are based on a 1 percent sample of all rail bills of lading. These data were expanded to de- velop estimates of annual shipments and receipts in each state and then compared with the rail shipments reported by survey respondents (Table 6). There are many similarities, but there are also a few major differ- ences. In Nebraska, for example, intrastate shipments were seriously understated in the 1 percent waybill sample. Table 4. Comparison of 1977 Sorghum Receipts, Shipments, and Inspections for Export at Various Port Areas Port area" Quantities determined by survey Inspections for export" Receipts Exports Great Lakes Region Atlantic Region Gulf Region East Gulf thousands of bushels Gulf.... as Gulf . as Gulf . 11,126 135,425 93,300 7,854 132,010 91,100 5,526 127,062 91,173 Subtotal 239,851 230,964 223,761 Pacific Region Columbia River ... 15 15 PugetSound 2,196 1,641 1,378 California 2,093 1,919 1,869 Subtotal 4,304 3,575 3,247 Total 244,1 55 234,539 227,008 a See Table 3 for a list of ports. b Inspections for export under the U.S. Grain Standards Act and reported in Grain Market News, Agricultural Marketing Ser- vice, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Vol. 26, No. 2 (January 13, 1978), p. 18. The comparisons between various data sources in- crease the confidence in the accuracy of estimates de- rived from sampling a less than perfectly identified population. The logic of each flow reported in these tables has been checked by the university person that organized the survey in each state. Where internal in- consistencies were found, the data and the sampling rates were adjusted with assistance from grain special- ists and industry personnel in the state. The flow esti- Table 5. Comparison of 1 977 Waterway Movements of Sorghum in the U.S. as Reported by Survey Respondents and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Originating state Destination state Survey results Corps of Engineers data Arkansas Louisiana Texas Subtotal thousands of bushels 2,010 723 200 2,010 923 Florida Louisiana Texas Subtotal 246 66 224 246 290 Illinois Louisiana Texas Other Subtotal 100 989 616 153 88 1,089 857 Iowa Texas 38 Kansas Louisiana 552 214 Kentucky Louisiana Texas Subtotal 46 98 144 Louisiana Louisiana Texas Subtotal 160 174 196 160 370 Minnesota Louisiana Missouri Subtotal 1,381 351 2,732 Mississippi Louisiana 48 Missouri Louisiana Texas Subtotal 2,966 1,024 3,990 2,566 1,510 4,076 Oklahoma Louisiana Texas Subtotal 71 54 125 Tennessee Louisiana Texas Subtotal 815 816 210 815 1,026 Texas Texas 1,266 U.S. Total 8,862 12,061 mates presented in the following sections represent the best information available on the actual volume of sor- ghum transported between the regions of the United States. Tables. Comparison of 1977 Rail Movements of Sorghum as Reported by Survey Respondents and as Estimated from the 1 Percent Waybill Sample In Selected States Originating Destination Survey Waybill state state results data thousands of bushels Colorado California 3,979 4,120 Texas 1,604 1,078 Other 178 692 Subtotal 5,761 5,890 Kansas Arkansas 5,007 1,349 Arizona 4,955 2,442 California 8,420 8,968 Colorado 768 2,856 Kansas 31,316 30,424 Louisiana 802 Missouri 7,229 3,952 Oklahoma 2,785 2,967 Texas 49,622 51 ,772 Other 324 468 Subtotal 111,228 105,197 Missouri Arkansas 1,635 1,164 California 2,075 Kansas 1,966 1,496 Louisiana 17 668 Missouri 8,313 3,184 Texas 14,607 14,430 Washington 172 428 Other 99 Subtotal 28,893 21,370 Nebraska Arizona 1,295 1,699 California 4,373 4,455 Colorado 1,890 1,710 Kansas 11,147 12,374 Missouri 574 4,109 Nebraska 52,194 6,087 Texas 58,374 60,412 Other 1,341 7,511 Subtotal 131,287 98,357 Oklahoma Oklahoma 215 1,653 Texas 3,538 2,463 Other 725 361 Subtotal 4,478 4,477 Texas Arizona 2,850 4,152 California 1 1 ,082 9,639 Texas 61,706 50,737 Other 3,358 Subtotal 78,996 64,528 OVERVIEW OF MOVEMENTS This section summarizes selected data and presents a general overview of sorghum movement patterns. De- tailed data on receipts and shipments for each region are presented in the last section of this bulletin. Shipments and Receipts by State In 1977, grain marketing firms in the United States reported shipping about 671 million bushels of sorghum. About 60 percent of the amount shipped moved to desti- nations within the state in which it originated. Much of the total amount, of course, is accounted for by the same grain being shipped in sequence by several firms. Intrastate shipments for each state and mode of trans- portation are summarized in Table 7. Trucks were the predominant mode of transportation, accounting for about 58 percent of the total intrastate shipments. Rail shipments accounted for 38 percent of the total amount shipped, and 4 percent moved to local farmers. A size- able portion of the intrastate movements consisted of shipments from country elevators to terminal elevators for storage and reshipment. Movements within the state of Texas accounted for more than one-half of the total volume of intrastate movements in the United States. Sizeable movements also occurred within the states of Kansas and Nebraska. In contrast to intrastate movements, the predominant mode of transportation used for interstate shipments was the railroad, which carried 217 million bushels or 83 percent of the total volume (Table 8). Almost three- fourths of the volume moving by railroads originated in Kansas and Nebraska. Kansas, Texas, and California were the principal destinations for shipments origi- nating in Nebraska. Texas and California were the prin- cipal destinations for Kansas's rail shipments, and Arkansas, Missouri, and Arizona were also important destinations. Over 5 million bushels moved by rail from Kansas to each of these states. Interstate truck movements originating in Kansas accounted for almost one-half of the volume shipped across state lines by truck. Most of these shipments moved short distances to the neighboring states of Mis- souri, Oklahoma, and Texas, where some of the grain was used by feed processors and the balance was stored and later reshipped to port areas. Barges carried only 3.3 percent of the sorghum shipped across state lines, and Arkansas, Illinois, and Missouri originated 81.5 percent of the total volume shipped in the U.S. by barge. All sorghum shipped by barge, re- gardless of the state in which it originated, was destined for Gulf Ports. The volume of sorghum received in each state from other states is shown in Table 9. Texas port areas were the predominant destinations. Arizona and California were the most important domestic markets in the West while Arkansas and Louisiana were important domestic markets in the South. The domestic flow pattern for sorghum is illustrated in Figure 3. Table 7. 1977 Intrastate Shipments of Sorghum for Each State and Mode of Transportation Originating state Mode of transportation Rail Truck Barge Farm truck" Total thousands of bushels Alabama 10 47 57 Arizona 583 8,065 4,109 12,757 Arkansas 1 0,521 78 1 0,599 California 1,543 2,316 3,859 Florida 76 76 Georgia 52 2 54 Illinois 226 150 376 Iowa 183 183 Kansas 31,316 17,097 48,413 Louisiana 623 1 60 783 Mississippi 82 82 Missouri 8,31 3 5,943 1 4,256 Nebraska 52,194 31,269 7,553 91,016 New Mexico 5,447 5,447 North Carolina 32 32 64 Oklahoma 215 215 430 Texas 61 ,706 158,400 220,106 Total volume 155,912 235,147 160 17,339 408,558 Percentage of total volume 38.2 57.6 4.2 100.0 "This column reports sales by elevators to farmers within the state. Not all states included farm sales in their survey responses, so these data are incomplete and underestimate total shipments to farmers. Figure 3. Patterns of sorghum flow to domestic destinations, 1977. Table 8. 1977 Interstate Shipments of Sorghum for Each State and Mode of Transportation Originating state Mode of transportation Rail Truck Barge Farm truck 3 1,089 552 3,990 815 8,702 3.3 171 1,796 1,967 0.7 Total thousands of bushels Arizona 94 71 Arkansas 5,838 2,429 2,010 Colorado 5,761 927 Florida 246 Illinois 1,938 284 Iowa 2,054 258 Kansas 79,912 16,448 Kentucky 32 Louisiana 12 51 Missouri 20,580 3,080 Nebraska 78,994 3,974 New Mexico 484 3,724 Oklahoma 4,263 1 ,535 South Dakota 98 28 Tennessee 32 Texas 17,290" 1,700 Total volume 217,318 34,573 Percentage of total volume . 82.8 13.2 262,560 100.0 "This column reports sales by elevators to farmers in other states. Not all states included farm sales in their survey responses, so these data are incomplete and underestimate total shipments to farmers. b Includes 2,780,000 bushels shipped by rail to Mexico. Movements to Ports Table 10 shows the amount of sorghum that moved to port locations from each of the originating states by the various modes of transportation. Almost one-half of the volume of sorghum that moved to ports originated in Texas, and the Gulf region accounted for 98.5 percent of the total amount received by all ports. Over 64 per- cent of the sorghum shipped to ports went by rail. Ne- braska, Kansas, and Texas were the states that shipped the largest volume of sorghum by rail for export, ac- counting for over 85 percent of the total amount of sor- ghum shipped to the port regions. Missouri shipped a significant amount by rail and ranked fourth among all states that originated sorghum rail shipments to port regions. Thirty-two percent of the sorghum shipped to port regions went by truck. Texas was the state that shipped the largest amount by truck, accounting for almost 94 percent of the 79 million bushels that moved by truck to ports. Less than 9 million bushels were shipped by barge to port regions, and over one-half of this volume originated in Missouri. These movements are illustrated in Figure 4. Each state's share of the total volume of sorghum shipped to port regions is shown in Figure 5. Texas was the state that shipped the greatest amount of sorghum for export, accounting for 48.6 percent of the total amount shipped. Nebraska and Kansas shipped sig- nificant volumes, ranking second and third, respec- tively, among all states that originated sorghum ship- ments to port locations. Combined, these two states accounted for almost two-fifths of the total volume mov- ing to port locations. The estimated amount of sorghum received at all port areas in 1977 totaled 243 million bushels, of which 227 million bushels were inspected for export (Table 11). The remainder was either processed or represented in- creases in sorghum stocks at port elevators during 1977. Over 98 percent of sorghum exports were handled by Gulf port elevators, and the North Texas Gulf was the predominant port area, accounting for 56 percent of the total volume exported. The South Texas Gulf area ranked second on the basis of volume, and over 91 million bushels were handled through those facilities in 1977. Foreign Destinations for U.S. Exports Sorghum shipped from the various origins to a spe- cific port area is blended and stored on a commingled basis. Thus it is not possible to trace the movement of 10 sorghum from a particular state through the port system to its final destination, and therefore no attempt was made to determine whether a particular ocean vessel was loaded with, for example, Kansas sorghum or Texas sorghum. It is nonetheless of interest to examine one more link in the market chain that connects U.S. farmers with foreign feeders and processors. The destination countries for sorghum exported from the major port regions of the United States are shown in Table 12. In 1977 Japan was the leading buyer of U.S. sorghum, accounting for 89 million bushels or 39 per- cent of the total volume exported. Israel, Mexico, Portu- gal, and Spain were the next most important destina- tions and in combination purchased about the same quantity as Japan. Venezuela and Columbia were major destinations in South America, and sizeable quantities were shipped to European countries. Data on receipts and shipments for individual state and substate areas delineated in the survey are presented in the following section. Table 9. 1977 Interstate Receipts of Sorghum for Each State and Mode of Transportation Destination state Mode of transportation Rail Truck Barge Farm truck" Total Alabama 233 Arizona 9,624 Arkansas 6,894 California 30,431 Colorado 2,658 Connecticut 1 67 Illinois 83 Iowa 133 Kansas 1 3,362 Kentucky 86 Louisiana 6,036 Minnesota 203 Mississippi 303 Missouri 7,929 Nebraska 14 Nevada 3 New Mexico Ohio 125 Oklahoma 2,922 Oregon 15 Tennessee 675 Texas 132,022 Utah 289 Washington 331 Total volume 214,538 Percentage of total volume . 82.8 thousands of bushels 80 2,934 1,551 243 876 214 96 4,002 52 6,689 28 368 4,595 23 12 1 ,898 160 15,576 2,013 1,865 34,573 13.3 8,702 3.4 946 288 48 1,282 0.5 259,095 100.0 a This column shows elevator receipts in each state from farmers located in all other states as reported by elevators in the receiving states. 11 Figure 4. Patterns of sorghum flow to port areas, 1977. Table 10. 1977 Movements of Sorghum to Points of Export for Each Originating State by Three Modes of Trans- portation Originating state Export region Mode of transportation Rail Truck Barge Total thousands of bushels Arizona .... Gulf 94 94 Arkansas . ... Gulf 4,865 2,010 6,875 Pacific 1,865 1,865 Florida , ... Gulf 246 246 Illinois ... Gulf 1,128 1,089 2,217 Iowa . ... Gulf 1,941 1,941 Kansas . ... Gulf 38,949 3,114 552 42,615 Pacific 241 241 Louisiana . ... Gulf 12 22 160 194 Missouri . ... Gulf 10,514 13 3,990 14,517 Pacific 172 172 Nebraska , ... Gulf 53,779 45 53,824 Pacific 1 ,285 1,285 New Mexico . ... Gulf 122 122 Oklahoma . ... Gulf 2,186 2,186 Tennessee . ... Gulf 815 815 Texas . ... Gulf 39,045 74,160 113,205 Pacific 187 187 Mexico 2,780 2,780 All states . ... Gulf 152,635 77,354 8,862 238,851 Pacific 1 ,885 1,865 3,750 Mexico 2,780 2,780 Total volume 157,300 79,219 8,862 245,381 Percentage of total volume 64.1 32.3 3.6 100.0 12 Table 11. 1977 Receipts of Sorghum at Port Areas by Each Mode of Transportation Export region and port area Mode of transportation Total receipts nspections Rail Truck Barge Farm truck 8 Great Lakes Region 22 34,866 42,466 77,354 1,865 thousands 6,849 2,013 of bushels 11,126 134,425 93,300 238,851 15 2,196 2,165 4,376 243,227 100.0 5,526 127,062 91,173 223,761 1,378 1,869 3,247 227,008 Atlantic Region Gulf Region Louisiana Gulf 4 255 North Texas Gulf 97546 South Texas Gulf . . . . 50,834 Subtotal . . . 1 52 635 8,862 626 Pacific Region Columbia River . . 15 Puget Sound 331 California 1,539 Subtotal 1 885 1,865 79,219 32.6 8,862 3.6 626 626 0.3 Total receipts 154520 Percentage of total receipts 63.5 'This column reports receipts at elevators in each port area delivered directly from farmers. Figure 5. Proportion of 1977 sorghum movements to export regions from each originating state. 13 RECEIPTS AND SHIPMENTS BY AREA Estimates of the flow of sorghum by each mode of trans- portation and for every area are presented in Tables 13-115. These estimates represent the most comprehen- sive and best data available on the volume of sorghum transported between each of the regions of the United States. A detailed study of the flows will likely lead some readers to the conclusion that there are inefficiencies in the shipment of grain among states. Shipping sor- ghum in both directions between two states is one ex- ample of an apparent inefficiency in the marketing pat- tern. However, most of the shipments reported in this study reflect sellers' attempts to take advantage of profit- able marketing opportunities that occur at a particular moment. It is not possible to provide a rationale for all of the movements without complete knowledge of daily price and transportation relationships. Local supply and demand vary throughout the marketing year, and buyers constantly seek the most economical supply source. Changes in supplies, demands, and transportation costs result in frequent changes in the most profitable ship- ping pattern. The availability of storage space at harvest time is also an important factor in determining sorghum shipments. If local storage facilities are filled with wheat when sor- ghum moves from the farms, country elevators may be forced to ship sorghum to various terminal locations such as Kansas City for storage. If these movements are by rail under transit rates, then this grain is committed to moving to domestic and export points beyond the terminal location. Later in the year, available supplies in the local region may be exhausted, and feed mills and livestock feeders in that area will begin purchasing sorghum from outside sources, reversing the earlier outbound flow. Many other factors, such as the avail- ability of transportation, have a substantial impact on sorghum movements. An inadequate supply of rail cars during periods of peak movement may force sorghum to flow in a pattern that would not otherwise be the most economical. A detailed analysis of the influence of these factors is beyond the scope of this publication. Readers interested in more detailed information about the type of firms involved in sorghum movements and the seasonaliry of these movements should contact Agri- cultural Experiment Station representatives in the par- ticipating states. Table 12. 1977 Exports of U.S. Sorghum by Export Region and Destination Destination Export region 3 Total Gulf Pacific thousands of bushels Belgium 8,267 8,267 Colombia 3,792 3,792 Cyprus 550 550 Ecuador 83 83 Egypt 993 993 El Salvador 1,173 1,173 Gambia 130 130 Guatemala 165 165 Honduras 442 442 Iran 1,042 1,042 Israel 26,612 26,612 Italy 730 730 Ivory Coast 197 197 Jamaica 286 286 Japan 85,356 3,247 88,603 Lebanon 173 173 Mexico 24,615 24,615 Netherlands 5,288 5,288 Nicaragua 231 231 Norway 4,708 4,708 Peru 2,041 2,041 Poland 5,786 5,786 Portugal 18,890 18,890 Romania 2,545 2,545 Senegal 1,985 1,985 Spain 1 8,080 1 8,080 United Kingdom . . 1,590 1,590 Venezuela 8,071 8,071 Total 223,761 3,247 227,008 Source: Grain Market News, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Vol. 26, No. 5 (February 3, 1978), pp. 11-15. " Sorghum was not shipped from the Great Lakes and Atlantic regions during 1977. 14 TABLE 13. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2600 , ALABAMA : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION J nC'TRTMATTMr! + UrMUllXM I J.PIU STATE OR PORT AREA ! I t J FARM : TOTAL RAIL J TRUCK J BARGE J TRUCK t (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2200 ILLINOIS 203 203 2300 KENTUCKY 32 32 2400 TENNESSEE 32 32 2600 ALABAMA 10 47 35 92 3505 KANSAS 30 16 46 TOTAL VOLUME 243 127 35 405 TABLE 14. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2600 i ALABAMA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA FARM RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK \ (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2600 ALABAMA 10 47 57 TOTAL VOLUME 10 47 57 TABLE 15* 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4401 r ARIZONA 15 OR I (3 1 NAT ING STATE OR PORT AREA 2900 MISSOURI 3404 NEBRASKA 3405 NEBRASKA 3501 KANSAS 3504 KANSAS 3505 KANSAS 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 4000 COLORADO 4100 NEW MEXICO 4401 ARIZONA 4402 ARIZONA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION * t FARM RAIL. J TRUCK : BARGE * t TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 82 438 487 308 173 3449 173 132 67 2050 4 1256 68 152 881 180 583 5360 2033 1720 591 TOTAL. 82 438 795 173 3622 199 2054 1256 68 1033 180 7976 2311 TOTAL. VOLUME 7614 9949 2624 20187 TABLE 16* 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4401 , ARIZONA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 4401 ARIZONA 4402 ARIZONA 4704 CALIFORNIA 7304 SO, TEXAS GULF 583 5360 4109 10052 450 450 71 71 94 94 TOTAL VOLUME 677 5881 4109 10667 16 TABLE 17 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4402 ARIZONA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3405 3505 3711 3712 4401 4402 NEBRASKA KANSAS TEXAS TEXAS ARIZONA ARIZONA : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION _..... * + * * 4 FARM TOTAL : RAIL j TRUCK J BARGE * TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 370 370 1003 1003 450 450 52 52 450 450 425 1291 1716 TOTAL VOLUME 1823 927 129.1. 4041 TABLE 18, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4402 , ARIZONA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 4401 ARIZONA 4402 ARIZONA 4403 ARIZONA TOTAL VOLUME : MODE | OF TRANSP ORTATION TOTAL # * * * * I : FARM : RAIL : TRUCK t BARGE TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 1720 1720 425 425 110 110 2255 ?25S 17 TABLE 19, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4403 ARIZONA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL 3505 KANSAS 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 4100 NEW MEXICO 4402 ARIZONA 4403 ARIZONA TRUCK- BARGE FARM TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 198 198 256 256 14 3 17 12 12 290 10 300 110 261 371 350 350 TOTAL VOLUME 770 123 611 1504 TABLE 20, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3005 ARKANSAS ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION * I j FARM TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE * TRUCK ( THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2200 ILLINOIS 146 146 2900 MISSOURI 812 27 839 3005 ARKANSAS 3038 ARKANSAS 1297 12 378 12 1675 3405 NEBRASKA 27 27 3503 KANSAS 3505 KANSAS 688 137 688 137 TOTAL VOLUME 1783 1351 390 3524 18 TABLE 21, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3016 , ARKANSAS STATE * RIGINATING : OR PORT AREA I MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : t I * 4 i * FARM : TOTAL 4 t RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE i TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2900 MISSOURI 123 950 1073 3016 ARKANSAS 165 165 3405 NEBRASKA 35 256 291 3503 KANSAS 3422 3422 3505 KANSAS 406 406 TOTAL VOLUME 3986 1206 165 5357 TABLE 22 * 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3017> ARKANSAS ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION # ....._... RAIL : TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 2800 2900 3038 3505 IOWA MISSOURI ARKANSAS KANSAS 71 700 221 672 71 700 672 221 TOTAL VOLUME 992 672 1664 TABLE 23. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS FIRMS IN AREA 3038 r ARKANSAS ORIGINS BY ORIGINATING ! MODE OF TRANSPORTATION t STATE OR PORT AREA I J 4 4 4 4 FARM TOTAL 4 * RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE 4 4 TRUCK t i ( THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2900 MISSOURI 291 291 3038 ARKANSAS 8552 10876 19428 3505 KANSAS 133 133 TOTAL VOLUME 133 8843 10876 19852 TABLE 24. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3038* ARKANSAS 19 DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION * ,. RAIL. TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2400 TENNESSEE 675 160 835 2500 MISSISSIPPI 97 97 2900 MISSOURI 127 127 3005 ARKANSAS 1297 1297 3017 ARKANSAS 672 18 690 3038 ARKANSAS 8552 60 8612 3100 LOUISIANA 2 2 3745 TEXAS 298 178 476 7302 LOUISIANA GULF 3965 2010 5975 7303 NO, TEXAS GULF 900 900 7402 PUGET SOUND 1865 1865 TOTAL VOLUME 5838 12950 2010 78 20876 TABLE 25. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4701 r CALIFORNIA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA : MODE # . .... -~ I RAIL ! OF TRANSPORTATION : : FARM TRUCK J BARGE : TRUCK TOTAL ( THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3404 NEBRASKA 1626 1626 3502 KANSAS 475 475 3504 KANSAS 206 206 3602 OKLAHOMA 54 54 3723 TEXAS 212 212 3745 TEXAS 261 261 4703 CALIFORNIA 1880 755 2635 TOTAL VOLUME 2834 1880 755 5469 20 TABLE 26, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4703 x CALIFORNIA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3405 NEBRASKA 3502 KANSAS 3504 KANSAS 3712 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 4703 CALIFORNIA TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM RAIL t TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 637 8 645 147 147 23 23 8 8 15 15 310 5093 5403 675 473 5093 6241 TABLE 27. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4703r CALIFORNIA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 4701 CALIFORNIA 4703 CALIFORNIA 4704 CALIFORNIA TOTAL VOLUME RAIL : TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK- (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 1880 1880 310 310 1543 126 1669 1543 2316 3859 21 TABLE 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 470-4!- CALIFORNIA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 2900 MISSOURI 3404 NEBRASKA 3405 NEBRASKA 3501 KANSAS 3502 KANSAS 3503 KANSAS 3504 KANSAS 3505 KANSAS 3602 OKLAHOMA 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 4000 COLORADO 4401 ARIZONA 4700 CALIFORNIA 4704 CALIFORNIA TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL. 2075 2075 68 68 931 93.1. 3855 3855 899 899 512 5.12 1224 1224 985 985 448 448 98.13 9813 572 9 581 22 22 3979 3979 71 71 643 643 1543 126 1669 26926 206 643 27775 TABLE 29. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4000 y COLORADO ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3401 3403 3404 3405 3501 3505 4000 NEBRASKA NEBRASKA NEBRASKA NEBRASKA KANSAS KANSAS COLORADO MODE OF TRANSPORTATION * * FARM TOTAL RAIL. : TRUCK t BARGE J TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 60 97 157 7 7 981 981 842 157 999 95 622 717 673 673 3650 3650 TOTAL VOLUME 2658 876 3650 7184 22 TABLE 30 , 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4000 y COLORADO J MODE OF TRANSPORTATION J * * * * STATE OR PORT AREA : : : : FARM J TOTAL : RAIL. : TRUCK : BARGE J TRUCK t (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3502 KANSAS 18 18 3503 KANSAS 8 18 26 37.1.1 TEXAS 1355 28 1383 3712 TEXAS 244 244 3745 TEXAS 50005 4401 ARIZONA 152 881 1033 4704 CALIFORNIA 3979 000 3979 TOTAL VOLUME 5761 927 6688 TABLE 31. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 600* CONNECTICUT MODE OF TRANSPORTATION ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA FARM : TOTAL. RAIL. : TRUCK : BARGE I TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2200 ILLINOIS 167 167 TOTAL VOLUME 167 000 167 TABLE 32, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 1700, FLORIDA I MODE OF TRANSPORTATION ! * * t STATE OR PORT AREA : til FARM I TOTAL : RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 1700 FLORIDA 76 179 255 TOTAL VOLUME 76 179 255 23 TABLE 33. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 1700.. FLORIDA : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION I 4 + STATE OR PORT AREA : : I I FARM : TOTAL : RAIL : TRUCK . BARGE : TRUCK I (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 1700 FLORIDA 76 76 7302 LOUISIANA GULF 246 246 TOTAL VOLUME 76 246 322 TABLE 34. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 1600 GEORGIA : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : flC* T f* T fc.1 AT T M/"* * * UrVXu-LixHIXPtU * + STATE OR PORT AREA : : I I FARM I TOTAL : RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 1600 GEORGIA 52 61 113 TOTAL VOLUME 52 61 113 TABLE 35. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 1600 GEORGIA : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION T"i CT O T T M A *T" T ft XJ # JLJC.OIXiNHIJ.Url * STATE OR PORT AREA I III FARM TOTAL : RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 1600 GEORGIA 52 2 54 TOTAL VOLUME 52 2 54 24 TABLE 36, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2200 r ILLINOIS ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 2200 ILLINOIS 2300 KENTUCKY 2900 MISSOURI 3405 NEBRASKA 3503 KANSAS TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION * # * RAIL : TRUCK J BARGE : FARM : TRUCK : TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 226 1525 1751 735 735 392 392 214 214 83 83 83 440 2652 3175 TABLE 37, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2200, ILLINOIS DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL J J { FARM J TRUCK t BARGE .* TRUCK : 600 CONNECTICUT 2200 ILLINOIS 2500 MISSISSIPPI 2600 ALABAMA 2900 MISSOURI 3005 ARKANSAS 7302 LOUISIANA GULF 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF 7304 SO, TEXAS GULF (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 167 167 226 150 376 294 294 203 203 284 284 146 146 196 100 296 583 989 1572 349 349 TOTAL VOLUME 1938 510 1089 150 3687 25 TABLE 38. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2800 , IOWA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 2800 IOWA 3403 NEBRASKA 3405 NEBRASKA TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM RAIL J TRUCK : BARGE t TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 64 69 133 183 16 80 279 162 .1.62 TOTAL 345 80 149 574 TABLE 39, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2800* IOWA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION t RAIL : * TRUCK : * BARGE J FARM TRUCK 2500 MISSISSIPPI 2800 IOWA 2900 MISSOURI 3017 ARKANSAS 3405 NEBRASKA 3503 KANSAS 7302 LOUISIANA GULF 7303 NO* TEXAS GULF 7304 SO, TEXAS GULF TOTAL VOLUME (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2054 441 TOTAL 220 220 183 183 28 28 71 71 14 19 33 19 19 94 94 1644 1644 203 203 2495 26 TABLE 40. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3500 y KANSAS ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3501 KANSAS 3502 KANSAS 3503 KANSAS 3504 KANSAS 3505 KANSAS TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION * * * * * * * J FARM I TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK * (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 457 457 1422 1422 687 687 460 112 572 667 667 460 3345 3805 TABLE 41. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3501 KANSAS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA FARM TRUCK TOTAL 3501 KANSAS TOTAL VOLUME RAIL J TRUCK I BARGE (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 398 47297 47695 398 47297 47695 27 TABLE 42. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3501 KANSAS * DESTINATION MODE OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OR PORT AREA . . 4 * : FARM TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK- (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2900 MISSOURI 246 2706 2952 3500 KANSAS 457 457 3501 KANSAS 398 398 3502 KANSAS 2473 21 2494 3503 KANSAS 139 183 322 3504 KANSAS 1921 216 2137 3505 KANSAS 365 365 3711 TEXAS 2220 2220 3712 TEXAS 1231 1231 3723 TEXAS 191 277 468 3745 TEXAS 50 79 129 4000 COLORADO 95 622 717 4401 ARIZONA 173 173 4704 CALIFORNIA 3855 3855 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF 26 26 TOTAL VOLUME 10765 7179 17944 TABLE 43. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3502 , KANSAS * MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : nDTfiTWATTWr* * U r\ J. LI 1 Pr H 1 J. H U * ; STATE OR PORT AREA J * : J FARM J TOTAL * RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE i TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2900 MISSOURI 73 73 3401 NEBRASKA 123 123 3402 NEBRASKA 194 194 3404 NEBRASKA 117 32 171 320 3405 NEBRASKA 1303 202 1505 3501 KANSAS 2473 21 2494 3502 KANSAS 2451 3101 50941 56493 3503 KANSAS 1644 105 1749 3504 KANSAS 146 146 3505 KANSAS 1261 12 1273 3602 OKLAHOMA 71 71 4000 COLORADO 18 18 TOTAL VOLUME 9874 3473 51112 64459 28 TABLE 44, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3502 , KANSAS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA * __ RAIL TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2900 MISSOURI 3404 NEBRASKA 3500 KANSAS 3502 KANSAS 3503 KANSAS 3504 KANSAS 3505 KANSAS 3602 OKLAHOMA 3711 TEXAS 3723 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 4701 CALIFORNIA 4703 CALIFORNIA 4704 CALIFORNIA 7303 NO* TEXAS GULF 7304 SO* TEXAS GULF 7403 CALIFORNIA TOTAL VOLUME 1609 271 1880 171 171 1422 1422 2451 3101 5552 3826 302 4128 2467 698 3165 1642 52 .1.694 554 554 1110 1110 128 128 697 697 475 475 147 147 899 899 6520 412 6932 987 987 68 68 20944 8894 171 30009 TABLE 45, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3503 KANSAS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA : 4 f * RAIL : * * TRUCK : BARGE t FARM : TRUCK # * TOTAL 1 C THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2800 IOWA 19 19 2900 MISSOURI 1627 1372 2999 3404 NEBRASKA 1625 1625 3405 NEBRASKA 2814 2198 5012 3501 KANSAS 139 183 322 3502 KANSAS 3826 302 4128 3503 KANSAS 1805 1546 2325 2 26603 3504 KANSAS 100 100 3505 KANSAS 1819 1229 3048 3604 OKLAHOMA 59 59 4000 COLORADO 8 18 26 TOTAL VOLUME 13822 6867 23252 43941 29 TABLE 46. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3503 KANSAS DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 2200 ILLINOIS 2900 MISSOURI 3005 ARKANSAS 3016 ARKANSAS 3100 LOUISIANA 3500 KANSAS 3502 KANSAS 3503 KANSAS 3504 KANSAS 3505 KANSAS 3602 OKLAHOMA 3604 OKLAHOMA 3711 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 4704 CALIFORNIA 7302 LOUISIANA GULF 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF 7304 SO. TEXAS GULF TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL J TRUCK : J FARM I BARGE J TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 83 83 3822 173 3995 688 688 3422 3422 688 688 687 687 1644 105 1749 1805 1546 3351 238 238 3105 2090 5195 1181 1181 342 342 285 285 3382 3382 512 512 552 552 11621 1330 12951 7468 21 7489 40286 5952 46790 TABLE 47, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3504 > KANSAS ORIGINATING MODE OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OR PORT AREA 1 I : * * FARM TOTAL RAIL ! TRUCK : BARGE 4 * TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3401 NEBRASKA 108 108 3404 NEBRASKA 60 60 3405 NEBRASKA 330 4 334 3501 KANSAS 1921 216 2137 3502 KANSAS 2467 698 3165 3503 KANSAS 238 238 3504 KANSAS 2877 1438 18120 22435 3505 KANSAS 664 754 1418 3601 OKLAHOMA 93 28 121 TOTAL VOLUME 8758 3138 18120 30016 30 TABLE 48. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3504 KANSAS DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 2900 3500 3502 3503 3504 3505 3602 3711 3723 3745 3789 4401 4701 4703 4704 7303 7304 7403 MISSOURI KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS ARIZONA CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA NO, TEXAS GULF SO. TEXAS GULF CALIFORNIA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK BARGE FARM t TRUCK J TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 731 731 460 112 572 146 146 100 100 2877 1438 4315 108 108 1216 457 1673 1274 1110 2384 320 162 482 696 696 151 138 289 3449 173 3622 206 206 23 23 1224 1224 2220 2220 1577 1577 24 24 TOTAL VOLUME 15375 5017 20392 TABLE 49. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3505 > KANSAS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 2900 3404 3405 3501 3502 3503 3504 3505 MISSOURI NEBRASKA NEBRASKA KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS RAIL TRUCK : BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 266 266 1108 1108 3365 365 129 3494 365 1642 52 1694 3105 108 2090 5195 108 1805 1607 32986 36398 TOTAL VOLUME 11764 3878 32986 48628 TABLE 50 * 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3505!- KANSAS 31 * DESTINATION : STATE OR PORT AREA : + I * MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : MHMM1 _ * RAIL : * * TRUCK : BARGE J * FARM t TRUCK t TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 1825 OHIO 125 125 2300 KENTUCKY 86 86 2600 ALABAMA 30 16 46 2900 MISSOURI 1552 303 1855 3005 ARKANSAS 137 137 3016 ARKANSAS 406 406 3017 ARKANSAS 221 221 3038 ARKANSAS 133 133 3100 LOUISIANA 114 114 3500 KANSAS 667 667 3502 KANSAS 1261 12 1273 3503 KANSAS 1819 1229 3048 3504 KANSAS 664 754 1418 3505 KANSAS 1805 1607 3412 3602 OKLAHOMA 46 46 3604 OKLAHOMA 497 497 3711 TEXAS 933 933 3723 TEXAS 311 311 3745 TEXAS 2386 2386 3789 TEXAS 159 159 4000 COLORADO 673 673 4401 ARIZONA 132 67 199 4402 ARIZONA 1003 1003 4403 ARIZONA 198 198 4704 CALIFORNIA 985 985 7303 NO, TEXAS GULF 5860 1330 7190 7304 SO. TEXAS GULF 2670 21 2691 7403 CALIFORNIA 149 149 TOTAL VOLUME 23858 6503 30361 32 TABLE 51. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2300). KENTUCKY : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION O IT" T f * T M A T T M T* * I J IV J. L3 J. IN H I J. (V v3 # STATE OR PORT AREA : : J t FARM TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3505 KANSAS 86 86 TOTAL VOLUME 86 86 FIRMS IN AREA 2300 KENTUCKY : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION ! fiCTGTTMATTnM * * u r. o I J, ix H 1 J. u fx * * STATE OR PORT AREA J : { J FARM : TOTAL : RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2600 ALABAMA 32 32 TOTAL VOLUME 32 32 TABLE 53. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3100 r LOUISIANA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA FARM t TOTAL RAIL { TRUCK t BARGE J TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2900 MISSOURI 17 17 3038 ARKANSAS 02002 3100 LOUISIANA 579 475 1054 3405 NEBRASKA 673 000 673 3503 KANSAS 688 000 688 3505 KANSAS 114 000 114 3745 TEXAS 289 50 339 7302 LOUISIANA GULF 22 22 TOTAL VOLUME 1781 653 475 2909 33 TABLE 54, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3100 LOUISIANA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 2500 MISSISSIPPI 3100 LOUISIANA 7302 LOUISIANA GULF 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF TOTAL VOLUME FARM TOTAL RAIL J TRUCK BARGE (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 12 51 579 22 652 160 160 51 579 182 12 824 TABLE 55, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2700* MINNESOTA ORIGINATING MODE OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OR PORT AREA * * * * * * FARM TOTAL RAIL J TRUCK : BARGE + * TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2700 MINNESOTA 35 37 72 3302 SOUTH DAKOTA 28 28 3404 NEBRASKA 32 32 3405 NEBRASKA 171 171 TOTAL VOLUME 238 28 37 303 TABLE 56. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2700 r MINNESOTA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA J J J FARM TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK : 2700 MINNESOTA TOTAL VOLUME (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 35 35 35 35 34 TABLE 57, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2500* MISSISSIPPI ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE * * * * : RAIL : OF TRANSPORTATION J : FARM TOTAL TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2200 ILLINOIS 2500 MISSISSIPPI 2800 IOWA 2900 MISSOURI 3038 ARKANSAS 3100 LOUISIANA 294 9 82 220 97 51. 294 82 220 9 97 51 TOTAL VOLUME 303 450 753 TABLE 58. 1977 S FIRMS ORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS IN AREA 2500 MISSISSIPPI BY DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE * : RAIL : OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM : TOTAL TRUCK t BARGE t TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2500 MISSISSIPPI 82 82 TOTAL VOLUME 82 82 35 TABLE 59. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2900, MISSOURI ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 2200 ILLINOIS 284 284 2800 IOWA 28 946 974 2900 MISSOURI 8313 5943 22816 37072 3038 ARKANSAS 127 127 3302 SOUTH DAKOTA 98 98 3403 NEBRASKA 11 11 3404 NEBRASKA 98 98 3405 NEBRASKA 465 465 3501 KANSAS 246 2706 2952 3502 KANSAS 1609 271 1880 3503 KANSAS 3822 173 3995 3504 KANSAS 731 731 3505 KANSAS 1552 303 1855 TOTAL VOLUME 16242 10538 23762 50542 36 TABLE 60, .1.977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2900 y MISSOURI MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION J STATE OR PORT AREA J 2500 MISSISSIPPI 9 THOUSAND! 2900 MISSOURI 8313 5943 3005 ARKANSAS 812 27 3016 ARKANSAS 123 950 3017 ARKANSAS 700 3038 ARKANSAS 291 3100 LOUISIANA 17 3405 NEBRASKA 4 3502 KANSAS 73 3503 KANSAS 1627 1372 3505 KANSAS 266 3604 OKLAHOMA 17 3711 TEXAS 14 3712 TEXAS 36 3723 TEXAS 1873 387 3745 TEXAS 2206 4401 ARIZONA 82 4704 CALIFORNIA 2075 7302 LOUISIANA GULF 7303 NO, TEXAS GULF 6.1.78 7304 SO, TEXAS GULF 4336 13 7402 PUGET SOUND 172 TOTAL VOLUME RAIL J TRUCK J BARGE 2966 1024 28893 9023 3990 FARM TRUCK TOTAL 9 14256 839 1073 700 291 17 4 73 2999 266 17 14 36 2260 2206 82 2075 2966 7202 4349 172 41906 TABLE 61, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3401 NEBRASKA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL. FARM TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 3401 NEBRASKA 3403 NEBRASKA 3404 NEBRASKA 13 20 26 325 338 20 26 TOTAL VOLUME 59 325 384 37 TABLE 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3401 y NEBRASKA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK : BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL VOLUME (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 363 121 150 TOTAL 3401 NEBRASKA 13 86 99 3404 NEBRASKA 44 11 55 3405 NEBRASKA 28 28 3502 KANSAS 123 123 3504 KANSAS 108 108 4000 COLORADO 60 97 64 221 634 TABLE 63. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3402 NEBRASKA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA t RAIL 3402 NEBRASKA TOTAL VOLUME : TRUCK : BARGE (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 58 58 FARM { TOTAL TRUCK J 58 58 TABLE 64, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3402 > NEBRASKA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : J J FARM t TOTAL RAIL I TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3402 NEBRASKA 3502 KANSAS TOTAL VOLUME 194 58 58 194 194 58 252 38 TABLE 65, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3403 NEBRASKA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 3302 SOUTH DAKOTA 42 42 3403 NEBRASKA 950 2876 3826 3405 NEBRASKA 29 176 43 248 TOTAL VOLUME 29 1126 2961 4116 TABLE 66. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3403 r NEBRASKA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 2300 IOWA 2900 MISSOURI 3401 NEBRASKA 3402 NEBRASKA 3403 NEBRASKA 3404 NEBRASKA 3405 NEBRASKA 4000 COLORADO 7303 NO, TEXAS GULF TOTAL VOLUME + * | I * FARM TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE | * TRUCK * (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 64 16 80 11 11 20 28 48 28 28 950 181 1131 50 761 28 839 380 870 28 1278 7 7 18 16 34 530 2633 293 3456 TABLE 67. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3404 r NEBRASKA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3401 NEBRASKA 3403 NEBRASKA 3404 NEBRASKA 3405 NEBRASKA 3502 KANSAS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK : BARGE J FARM : TRUCK TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 44 11 55 50 761 811 5424 1925 5180 1108 21281 102 31885 3135 171 171 TOTAL VOLUME 7443 7060 21554 36057 39 TABLE 68 . 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3404 , NEBRASKA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA { f t FARM J TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE * TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2700 MINNESOTA 32 32 2900 MISSOURI 98 98 3401 NEBRASKA 26 26 3404 NEBRASKA 5424 5180 3626 14230 3405 NEBRASKA 1019 299 1318 3502 KANSAS 117 32 149 3503 KANSAS 1625 1625 3504 KANSAS 60 60 3505 KANSAS 1108 1108 3602 OKLAHOMA 9 48 57 3711 TEXAS 264 264 3712 TEXAS 128 128 3745 TEXAS 636 636 4000 COLORADO 981 1267 2248 4401 ARIZONA 438 438 4701 CALIFORNIA 1626 1626 4704 CALIFORNIA 68 68 4800 NEVADA 3 3 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF 8299 8299 7304 SO, TEXAS GULF 1679 1679 7402 PUGET SOUND 89 89 7403 CALIFORNIA 65 65 TOTAL VOLUME 23768 5585 4893 34246 TABLE 69, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3405 , NEBRASKA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA * t * * * MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : RAIL : TRUCK J * * BARGE : FARM TRUCK * J TOTAL 2800 2900 3401 3403 3404 3405 IOWA MISSOURI NEBRASKA NEBRASKA NEBRASKA NEBRASKA (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 14 19 9 42 4 66 70 28 380 870 28 1250 1019 299 521 1839 43295 21797 95937 161029 TOTAL VOLUME 44736 22989 96533 164258 40 TABLE 70* 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3405 NEBRASKA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL J TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK : TOTAL 2200 2700 2800 2900 3005 3016 3100 3401 3403 3404 3405 3502 3503 3504 3505 3602 3604 3711 3712 3745 4000 4401 4402 4703 4704 7303 7304 7401 7402 7403 ILLINOIS MINNESOTA IOWA MISSOURI ARKANSAS ARKANSAS LOUISIANA NEBRASKA NEBRASKA NEBRASKA NEBRASKA KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS COLORADO ARIZONA ARIZONA CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA NO. TEXAS GULF SO, TEXAS GULF COLUMBIA RIVER PUGET SOUND CALIFORNIA (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 214 214 171 171 69 80 149 465 465 27 27 35 256 465 756 673 673 1 1 29 176 351 556 1925 1108 29 3062 43295 21797 3167 68259 1303 202 1505 2814 2198 5012 330 4 334 3365 129 3494 51 51 60 36 4 100 1312 1312 548 108 656 1707 9 1716 842 157 999 487 308 795 370 370 637 8 645 931 931 28882 29 28911 14901 14901 15 15 70 70 1046 1046 TOTAL VOLUME 106333 26846 4017 137196 TABLE 71* 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4800 NEVADA 41 ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3404 NEBRASKA TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : J : : FARM : TOTAL. RAIL : TRUCK I BARGE : TRUCK . (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3 0003 30003 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4100 r NEW MEXICO ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3712 TEXAS 4100 NEW MEXICO TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION FARM : TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK J BARGE : TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 12 9643 12 9643 9643 9655 TABLE 73, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4100 NEW MEXICO DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3767 TEXAS 4401 ARIZONA 4403 ARIZONA 7304 SO, TEXAS GULF TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 72 1844 1916 1590 1590 100 100 180 180 290 10 300 122 122 484 3724 4208 42 TABLE 74. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 1400). NORTH CAROLINA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 1400 NORTH CAROLINA TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM : TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE { TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 32 32 1414 1478 32 32 1414 1478 TABLE 75. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 1400 NORTH CAROLINA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 1400 NORTH CAROLINA TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM RAIL : TRUCK J BARGE : TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 32 32 32 32 TOTAL 64 64 TABLE 76, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 1825 OHIO ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3505 KANSAS TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM TOTAL RAIL TRUCK BARGE : TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 125 000 125 000 125 125 43 TABLE 77. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3601 , OKLAHOMA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION 3601 OKLAHOMA TOTAL VOLUME : : FARM RAIL : TRUCK J BARGE I TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 000 10664 000 10664 TOTAL 10664 10664 TABLE 78, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3601 , OKLAHOMA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION 3504 KANSAS 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF 7304 SO. TEXAS GULF TOTAL VOLUME RAIL TRUCK : BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 93 28 121 1187 1255 2442 161 161 4 4 791 791 289 289 2525 1283 3808 TABLE 79. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 360 > OKLAHOMA ORIGINATING : MODE * OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OR PORT AREA J ! * * * * FARM TOTAL { RAIL t TRUCK J BARGE * * TRUCK t (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3404 NEBRASKA 9 48 57 3405 NEBRASKA 51 51 3502 KANSAS 554 554 3503 KANSAS 1181 1181 3504 KANSAS 1216 457 1673 3505 KANSAS 46 46 3602 OKLAHOMA 78 78 2577 2733 TOTAL VOLUME 2581 1137 2577 6295 44 TABLE 80. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3602 y OKLAHOMA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 3502 KANSAS 3602 OKLAHOMA 4701 CALIFORNIA 4704 CALIFORNIA TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM RAIL t TRUCK { BARGE : TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 651 78 TOTAL 71 71 78 78 156 54 54 448 448 729 TABLE 81, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3603 v OKLAHOMA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3603 OKLAHOMA 3712 TEXAS TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM RAIL. : TRUCK J BARGE { TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 137 137 137 306 443 3364 3364 TOTAL 3638 306 3944 TABLE 82. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3603 , OKLAHOMA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 3603 OKLAHOMA 3723 TEXAS 7303 NO, TEXAS GULF MODE OF TRANSPORTATION FARM TOTAL RAIL. 137 508 TRUCK BARGE (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 137 252 274 252 508 TOTAL VOLUME 645 389 1034 45 TABLE 83. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3604 , OKLAHOMA ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION 2900 3405 3503 3505 3604 MISSOURI NEBRASKA KANSAS KANSAS OKLAHOMA RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE FARM TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL VOLUME 17 60 342 419 36 497 533 2719 2719 TOTAL 17 96 342 497 2719 3671 TABLE 84, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3604 OKLAHOMA DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM : TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK J BARGE { TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3503 KANSAS 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF 59 598 59 598 TOTAL VOLUME 657 657 TABLE 85. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3302 SOUTH DAKOTA ORIGINATING J STATE OR PORT AREA : 3302 SOUTH DAKOTA TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM : TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK J BARGE J TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 000 126 126 000 126 126 46 TABLE 86* 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3302 SOUTH DAKOTA : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : Y*I nr o T T xi A T T n \t * * JU C O I JL rx H I 1 1 J I \ * STATE OR PORT AREA : : : J FARM ! TOTAL : RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2700 MINNESOTA 2900 MISSOURI 98 28 28 98 TOTAL VOLUME 98 28 126 TABLE 37 . 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2400.. TENNESSEE : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION { fl D T n T XI A T T M fS * * U f\ J. U Ji ix H I J. l\ 1.7 + # STATE OR PORT AREA J J : : FARM : TOTAL : RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3038 ARKANSAS 675 160 48 883 TOTAL VOLUME 675 160 48 883 TABLE 88, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 2400 , TENNESSEE : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION I T*iCT C T T M AT T HM + * JU C O I J. IN H I .1. U IN + # STATE OR PORT AREA : : : : FARM : TOTAL : RAIL. J TRUCK : BARGE J TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2600 ALABAMA 32 32 7302 LOUISIANA GULF 815 815 TOTAL VOLUME 32 815 847 47 TABLE 89, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3710* TEXAS ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM RAIL J TRUCK : BARGE J TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL. 3710 3711 3712 3723 3745 3767 3789 TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS 1867 2660 27265 31792 658 2292 2950 50 50 400 400 14 16 30 100 100 252 252 TOTAL VOLUME 2989 5320 27265 35574 TABLE 90. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3710* TEXAS DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION 3710 TEXAS 3767 TEXAS 3789 TEXAS 7304 SO, TEXAS GULF 9000 EXPORT RAIL TRUCK J BARGE FARM TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL 1867 2660 4527 50 50 5811 600 5704 600 11515 1884 1884 TOTAL VOLUME 9014 18576 48 TABLE 91. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3711* TEXAS ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 2900 MISSOURI 3404 NEBRASKA 3405 NEBRASKA 3501 KANSAS 3502 KANSAS 3503 KANSAS 3504 KANSAS 3505 KANSAS 3601 OKLAHOMA 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3723 TEXAS 4000 COLORADO 4100 NEW MEXICO TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL. 14 264 1312 2220 1110 285 1274 11.1.0 933 1187 1255 2358 37443 127 3835 400 1355 28 72 1844 TION : FARM TOTAL : TRUCK BUSHELS) 14 264 1312 2220 1110 285 2384 933 2442 6116 9 100970 3962 400 1383 1916 9181 49245 61169 119595 TABLE 92. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3711 , TEXAS DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 3710 TEXAS 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3723 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 3767 TEXAS 3789 TEXAS 4300 UTAH 4401 ARIZONA 4402 ARIZONA 4403 ARIZONA 4704 CALIFORNIA 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF 7304 SO. TEXAS GULF MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL : TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 658 2292 2950 2358 37443 39801 3495 755 4250 181 2119 2300 2460 340 2800 8 1002 1010 247 3 250 289 289 2050 4 2054 450 450 256 256 9813 9813 4116 83 4199 4465 739 5204 TOTAL VOLUME 30846 44780 75626 49 TABLE 93. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3712 , TEXAS ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION 2900 MISSOURI 3404 NEBRASKA 3405 NEBRASKA 3501 KANSAS 3601 OKLAHOMA 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3723 TEXAS 4000 COLORADO 4100 NEW MEXICO RAIL TRUCK : BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 36 36 128 128 548 108 656 1231 1231 161 161 3495 755 4250 2439 3071 16165 21675 1700 1700 244 244 1590 1590 TOTAL VOLUME 9946 5560 16165 31671 TABLE 94. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3712> TEXAS DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3603 OKLAHOMA 306 306 3710 TEXAS 50 50 3711 TEXAS 127 3835 3962 3712 TEXAS 2439 3071 5510 3723 TEXAS 3620 1080 4700 3745 TEXAS 288 312 600 3767 TEXAS 345 7355 7700 4100 NEW MEXICO 12 12 4401 ARIZONA 1256 1256 4402 ARIZONA 52 52 4403 ARIZONA 14 3 17 4703 CALIFORNIA 8 8 4704 CALIFORNIA 572 9 581 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF 4421 57 4478 7304 SO. TEXAS GULF 722 126 848 TOTAL VOLUME 12598 17482 30080 50 TABLE 95, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3723 v TEXAS n \Z> T R T Kl A T T M C * * * MODE OF TRANSPORTATION U \\ J. U .1. IN ("1 1 J. IN U STATE OR PORT AREA * I + * * * RAIL : : : FARM TRUCK J BARGE : TRUCK TOTAL t 2900 3501 3502 3504 3505 3603 3711 3712 3723 3745 3767 MISSOURI KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) IL873 387 191 277 128 320 162 311 252 181 2119 3620 1080 154 7896 105 54 2260 468 128 482 311 252 2300 4700 10530 18580 105 54 TOTAL VOLUME 6650 12460 10530 ?9640 TABLE 96* 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3723s- TEXAS DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION FARM TOTAL RAIL TRUCK : BARGE 3710 TEXAS 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3723 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 3767 TEXAS 3789 TEXAS 4701 CALIFORNIA 7303 NO, TEXAS GULF (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 400 400 1700 154 7896 40 460 100 150 212 1200 279 400 400 1700 8050 500 100 150 212 1479 TOTAL VOLUME 3706 9285 12991 51 TABLE 97. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3745 y TEXAS ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK J BARGE FARM TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL. 2900 3038 3404 3405 3501 3502 3503 3504 3505 3601 3711 3712 3723 3745 3789 4000 MISSOURI ARKANSAS NEBRASKA NEBRASKA KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS KANSAS OKLAHOMA TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS COLORADO 2206 298 636 1707 50 3382 2386 4 2460 288 40 1980 5 178 9 79 697 696 340 312 460 4770 300 2206 476 636 1716 129 697 3382 696 2386 4 37873 40673 600 500 6750 300 5 TOTAL VOLUME 15442 7841 37873 61156 TABLE 98. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3745* TEXAS DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK : BARGE FARM TRUCK 3100 LOUISIANA 3710 TEXAS 3723 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 3767 TEXAS 3789 TEXAS 4401 ARIZONA 4403 ARIZONA 4701 CALIFORNIA 4703 CALIFORNIA 4704 CALIFORNIA 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF 7304 SO. TEXAS GULF 7403 CALIFORNIA 9000 EXPORT (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 289 50 14 16 105 1980 4770 60 230 150 68 12 261 15 22 11919 19585 440 6927 187 896 TOTAL 339 30 105 6750 60 380 68 12 261 15 22 31504 7367 187 896 TOTAL VOLUME 16333 31663 47996 52 TABLE 99. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3767 TEXAS ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3710 TEXAS 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3723 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 3767 TEXAS 3789 TEXAS 4100 NEW MEXICO TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION 9 RAIL t # TRUCK : BARGE : FARM J TRUCK * * * * t TOTAL. (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 50 50 8 1002 1010 345 7355 7700 100 100 60 60 1100 639 9 A 7492 50 50 100 100 353 9817 6392 16562 TABLE 100. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3767 , TEXAS DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL : TRUCK- BARGE FARM TRUCK 3710 TEXAS 3723 TEXAS 3767 TEXAS 3789 TEXAS 7304 SO. TEXAS GULF TOTAL VOLUME (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) TOTAL. 100 100 54 54 1100 1100 110 110 44 44 1408 1408 53 TABLE 101* 1.977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3789, TEXAS ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3504 3505 3710 3711 3723 3745 3767 3789 KANSAS KANSAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TEXAS TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL TRUCK : BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 151 138 289 159 159 600 600 247 3 250 150 150 230 150 380 110 110 5250 71458 76708 787 6401 71458 78646 TABLE 102. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 3789 , TEXAS MODE OF TRANSPORTATION DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA RAIL : TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK- TOTAL 3710 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 3767 TEXAS 3789 TEXAS 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF 7304 SO. TEXAS GULF TOTAL VOLUME (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 252 252 300 300 50 50 5250 5250 1230 11745 12975 4721 28871 33592 5951 46468 52419 54 TABLE 103. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 4300 UTAH : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : n C' T n T M A T T M P * * u r\ J. u J. rN H I J. I x I j * STATE OR PORT AREA J : J : FARM : TOTAL : RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 3711 TEXAS 209 000 289 TOTAL. VOLUME 289 000 289 TABLE 104, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7302 LOUISIANA GULF : MODE OF TRANSPORTATION fl D T f * T Kl A T T M R U U J. U J. IN f-l I J. IN U STATE OR PORT AREA I III FARM TOTAL : RAIL { TRUCK J BARGE I TRUCK I (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 1700 2200 2400 2800 2900 3038 3100 3503 FLORIDA ILLINOIS TENNESSEE IOWA MISSOURI ARKANSAS LOUISIANA KANSAS 196 94 3965 )O ..A'.. 246 100 815 2966 2010 160 552 246 296 815 94 2966 5975 182 552 TOTAL VOLUME 4255 22 6849 11126 TABLE 105, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7302* LOUISIANA GULF DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 3100 LOUISIANA 9000 EXPORT MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM : TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE I TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 7854 22 7854 TOTAL VOLUME 7854 7876 TABLE 106, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7303, NO. TEXAS GULF 55 ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA MODE RAIL : OF TRANSPORTATION I .-........-....-.......- _-. ^ ......... ^ ..................................... * : FARM : TRUCK t BARGE : TRUCK : TOTAL < THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 2200 ILLINOIS 583 989 1572 2800 IOWA 1644 1644 2900 MISSOURI 6178 1024 7202 3038 ARKANSAS 900 900 3100 LOUISIANA 12 12 3403 NEBRASKA 18 16 34 3404 NEBRASKA 8299 8299 3405 NEBRASKA 28882 29 28911 3501 KANSAS 26 26 3502 KANSAS 6520 412 6932 3503 KANSAS 11621 1330 12951 3504 KANSAS 2220 2220 3505 KANSAS 5860 1330 7190 3601 OKLAHOMA 791 791 3603 OKLAHOMA 508 508 3604 OKLAHOMA 598 598 3711 TEXAS 4116 83 4199 3712 TEXAS 4421 57 4478 3723 TEXAS 1200 279 1479 3745 TEXAS 11919 19585 31504 3789 TEXAS 1230 11745 12975 TOTAL VOLUME 97546 34866 2013 134425 TABLE 107, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7303 NO. TEXAS GULF DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : * : J J FARM : TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK : 9000 EXPORT TOTAL VOLUME (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 132010 132010 132010 132010 56 TABLE 108, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7304 > SO. TEXAS GULF MODE OF TRANSPORTATION ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 2200 ILLINOIS 2800 IOWA 2900 MISSOURI 3404 NEBRASKA 3405 NEBRASKA 3502 KANSAS 3503 KANSAS 3504 KANSAS 3505 KANSAS 3601 OKLAHOMA 3710 TEXAS 3711 TEXAS 3712 TEXAS 3745 TEXAS 3767 TEXAS 3789 TEXAS 4100 NEW MEXICO 4401 ARIZONA * * RAIL : TRUCK (THOUSA 349 203 4336 13 1679 14901 987 7468 21 1577 2670 21 289 5811 5704 4465 739 722 126 440 6927 44 4721 28871 122 94 BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL VOLUME 50834 42466 TOTAL 349 203 4349 1679 14901 987 7489 1577 2691 289 115.1.5 5204 848 7367 44 33592 122 94 93300 TABLE 109. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7304* SO, TEXAS GULF DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : FARM : TOTAL : TRUCK : 9000 EXPORT TOTAL VOLUME RAIL : TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 91100 91100 91100 91100 TABLE 110. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7401 COLUMBIA RIVER 57 ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 3405 NEBRASKA TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL FARM TRUCK TRUCK I BARGE (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 15 15 TOTAL 15 15 TABLE 111. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7401 , COLUMBIA RIVER- DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 9000 EXPORT TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION J : t FARM : RAIL t TRUCK : BARGE J TRUCK : (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 15 15 TOTAL 15 15 TABLE 112. 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7402> PUGET SOUND ORIGINATING STATE OR PORT AREA 2900 MISSOURI 3038 ARKANSAS 3404 NEBRASKA 3405 NEBRASKA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION RAIL : TRUCK BARGE FARM TRUCK TOTAL (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 172 89 70 1865 172 1865 89 70 TOTAL VOLUME 331 1865 1196 58 TABLE 113, 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7402 PUGET SOUND DESTINATION STATE OR PORT AREA 9000 EXPORT TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : : FARM : TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE : TRUCK I (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 1641 1641 1641 1641 TABLE 114, 1977 SORGHUM RECEIPTS FROM VARIOUS ORIGINS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7403* CALIFORNIA MODE OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OR PORT AREA RAIL : TRUCK : FARM BARGE J TRUCK TOTAL VOLUME (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 1539 626 TOTAL 3404 NEBRASKA 65 65 3405 NEBRASKA 1046 1046 3502 KANSAS 68 68 3504 KANSAS 24 24 3505 KANSAS 149 149 3745 TEXAS 187 187 4703 CALIFORNIA 626 626 2165 TABLE 115. 1977 SORGHUM SHIPMENTS TO VARIOUS DESTINATIONS BY FIRMS IN AREA 7403 CALIFORNIA STATE OR PORT AREA : 9000 EXPORT TOTAL VOLUME MODE OF TRANSPORTATION : : FARM TOTAL RAIL : TRUCK : BARGE I TRUCK (THOUSANDS OF BUSHELS) 1919 1919 1919 1919 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-URBANA Q630.7IL6B BULLETIN. URBANA 7651981 CODS 30112019531174