ELECTRODE POTENTIAL OF MANGANESE By DAVID SCHLESINGER THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1921 * ’ ‘ •» 28 SEP 2] UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS \^ 2 .\ ^c3sf\« w 192I THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY ^yJ.d__Siil2ljeaing.eii ENTlTLED___Ele_ctrode_JPia.t-eiiti.ai._oX_i/langanase- IS APPROVED BY ME AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF __B§_CiL©lAr_J3l’__Si3lejlC_^ Instructor in Charge Approved : HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF 4T3694 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/electrodepotentiOOschl Table of Contents. page I. Introduction • 1 II. Theoretical . 2 III. Historical. 6 IV. Experimental . 7 Apparatus . Preparation of Materials. Results . V. Acknowledgement . 20. 1 THE ELECTRODE POTENTIAL OF MANGANESE. INTRODUCTION. The electrode potential of many of the elements has never been determined because of the great difficulties which arise in making electrolytic measurements between the metal and ions of the metal in solution. Many other obstacles are encountered duetto electrical phenomena such as over^joltage and passivity. The reactivity of others, as the alkali metals, necessitates indirect means of getting results. This research was carried out for the purpose of determining the potential difference between metallic manganese and a solutiori of a manganese salt normal with respect to manganese ions. The potential of this element has never been satisfactorily obtained. In the laboratory work in electrochemistry, electromotive force measurements were made on some of the moer common metals as zinc, copper and silver whose potentials are accurately known. The results obtained in these experiments by the students v;ere so poor that it seemed advisable to attempt to find the cause, at the same time gaining experience in methods used by the various investigators. r I® <\ 'm I ' . • ■• • • jh, iii *rm >i Wf i 5 • ,7 - ', • ".A r • - ri ■' .'f a • '"•r* t. ;•( •.': '’ I .:- oxS : -c.: r . ; i C. i:;; • i*,j. ' oj j : --.J c - Ev> . j_. - fii‘ ^ vr:. ;n i It; i; r. ■■ cic-u’^ j^Iq I- .• ;• r . I»-^bO;u : i 'j lo Y'^.f ViuOJ£o': 6^1T ' 1.^0 .lui-i'u.”': r,j . ' r:iJ JiX; ■> ^ > '.I*!/;.*; - *10*1 ^ii'6 J'.f.ac'. oa'oiXi.jji'fi^ *io Aci-^i-'lc/s •' e- j.t xifc>i>wiOu . ■' ■ \J< ,- V, , ^ lo J.^-iwnocf-oq '^ir . i.^lw J- : ':on . -:-'i..j.iJifo XlS'ioJ'OPrr^^J. ^ •; v^'n• a.-:il ^ if ^'Vi J’OX-O'X joojv' ^ ■ •■r ;I<« 'lx/ y-xo/ tfil^ f 'T - rr>: :L:co -i j ;.■.' b.. .>x 'X i:o T . n jc, i'O ih’S Yi : O'-Xx: , a r.-.'/ Jor •'•3( .' li.i ‘xo.;qoo t^i.’.. '• ■- \>’ ■■ ■■;•:■ • *£C'*qxv aas.-'j- ni DOi./^j-do orl x . . 'ca.'' v^;;/ 1 ;;/ Joi'ii u ) :i. o- . ~r : € .'I 'icoq OS iiJ .'i . iix l'Or.S/ . x,\^,V:u J ^,'_; i’l. .’ / O;; -'.-.n • 'iiJ' u.*' , ,: •ru;/ JLI 0 . j:l r/:.i r.jjo /'X-v/ , ,.j a i •^S( J SBpr*^ J V, 2 theoretical. The elctromotlve force produced by a voltaic cell is the sum of the electromotive forces produced at the junction between the electrodes and the solutions and of those produced' at the jun«?tions between the different solutions that may be present in the cell. The electromotive forces produced at the electrodes are caned the electrode potentials. The methods used in determining electrodes potentials are by measuring the electromotive force of an ordinary cell. It is there- fore customary to adopt as the value of the electrode potential of the half cell, the electromotive force of the vJj' 7:'3oti.o-o^q •S>«OCiJ;‘ *to titUi f j .-; •• . 1 .; '■ ■ 16 \'>xfd JtPt I ^ o*- „■ . ’ r. .. i. i/ilT r, 1 ■ 0 '/i-.irif t'-'i ,. -•. ..•■;J- orirf . •0 . :;. ■ .■J'jJ’ ''P /-fr .' •*?. -J ■ .'^7 {.;r/fliO 1 • ;;:» H i ’ /i- or;^.'; ,'.i J J = . of;.-. ' e': . . l .' ?. ^ ^ lv:,' 4 ;»£. ro v'.:I V 1 -4 .f .<.'i> *-■1 j ■: ■' J I - iVv ;• ' ,ii - ■li-' f ■■^■ r ■ :o. Oji' ^*W <> ' i, , • rf-Mi.'ifcy/- fj.-* ^ • I *. •'’' i : )j ■ i . -•"'c.;*' - ' '<: M . "* .■» . 1 t :> 'Me c . ■ •': .‘ j ?< !, : ' /i ■ I =■ o > f V.',/ -vi l i'iO ni ;,,{ , ,;•. /(■• \f:; . r.;q : /If 'I ' . J 0 r . / lo i ;^v/ioi... ..■ m i .-' .-r-'J- Vi vJLfl*-.-/ ^r.; . /ri 6 ij ,I.Jo /IN / V'. :--.f • ■ J /. . ^ ^rn/i -t.-ij- to i,*iJcrfW;}fK: \J-' i-' ■ . Ul: - ■ ;',r;: £X’^® ii'OilU /n .o'l 0V, Ic i\' ■ .. C/ro^Xocle jo :••; ■j'JM tj ':L' ‘ .' ■ O’i'i bfc' ; ’1.‘-' . :;r. oS B £1 ;»- ' / I.;j 1 4 • f,''/ / Moliiflr tc*vj*X «4 fuatjf' .'- i u ; 4 ' It 3 potential. Saturated potassium chloride forms an excellent bridge and practically eliminates the liquid junction. Just as the electromotive force of a cell is determined solely by the change in state that takes place in it, so any electrode potential i^ determined by the change in state that takes place at the electrode. With the aid of this principle and the general expression for the free energy change attending the transfer of a substance from a solution of one concentration to one of another and for the free energy change involved in the production of work in voltaic cells, the change of the electrode potential with the concentration of the ions can be calculated provided the concentrations are so small that the dissolved substances conform to the perfect gas laws. The free energy change attending the transfer of a substance from a solution of ■'one concentration to that of another concen- tration is, - Af = NRT In 2 . > Cz at the absolute temperature T, of that quantity of substance which is in N moles in the state of a perfect gas from an Infinite quantity of a solution in which its concentration is into an infinite quantity of another solution in which its concentration is Cg. The free energy change involved in the production of work in a voltaic cell is, - AF = ENP where E is the electromotive of the cell, N the equi vaients of substance involved, and F the quantity of electricity, the faraday equal to 966 cO coulombs, that passes when a reaction ^ aSt^iee^ROo^ fiOv+A-fiid-ziS " ;. j^lhPXl olf4 tiJ ^xX-8t>i4*Ow/i 'tfii ;K i*X«';oij Ctjml Ran.iii8Gto.Xoq ih^jo»Xis :iX JXfix XlMffifll O'? ?VAoJ-M ^ei>Xrov’ bBX0LHoX6o : itohWB^f ot nriolaoii i^tonfiCfRclt;^* fi«YXoik?»Xfc » ur^/i^irv- f 2o -ioa«p;^tX ’dSW'-* * *0r,C/p ' 1,'^ ;•» nJo-Tt 363 s to 9i3X» nrftf nl R^fom Pf nX Bi. iloiciw V ^1 {f6lXMXn0Dn6i> &XI ti-olrl* s-i aoi’^»_ ' IfcfT ',ftX i*»?Xcvni Bdj .^0 «i fj n^00 UX0il^^\M iXIX^AiP r^X ” tnB ,N^loy«X' '.i4'i * ■ '• • ■ 4 involvlns one equivalent of each of the reacting substances takes place at each electrode. Equating the free energy equations we get -AF = ENF = NRT In c^ then E = _ NRT ITf' in In the numerator N is always unity in electrode potential measure- ments. N in the denominator is the numbeiJ of faradays passing through the solution. Then E - in E is the electromotive force of the ceil and is equal to E-E where E is the specific electrode potential of the electrode in question, the specific electrode potential being defined as the electrode potential when the concentrations of the ions »re one moiai and the pressure is one atmosphere. ^ RT E -E = n7^ In c^. = E - log-^ at 18° C. n c -7 In the above equation c^ and represent the concentrations of the metallic ions in solution. In order to determine the concen trations of the ions it is necessary to know the degree of ionization of the salt in the solution at the concentration in question. The degree of ionization may easily be determined by conductivity measurements according to the standard method of Kohlrausch, where the degree of ionization is equal to where A is the conductivity at the concentration in question and Aothe conductivity at infinite dilution assuming the salt completely ionized at infinite dilution. It ruoirr.jBe'i t: : .i.' J' f .n. ic jloflo lo ^ro c.x •'*•■]■ -voj , iKfte ' oiU 3 £i^ w . • iicx- i'c-i'-Sf osk^lii - '■ i - -- nl T.T/- .0 , ^Hr jf o j •'. i-i .v» i’oi'! Ji'ijiiedorj; jor; - jc,; \ jJ pl .; . ' .< 'ir j-i'ii-.j. :.i, cx^vt r, i': l:o 'ioc'j^i;:' J 'r.i ;oci »»n;j:.cil«b OXi.; n.L ' . r.-fxi. . ■ .’■Jx.Ir'] xJ- rl- I r, , i-c -• > t '•< j r - ' j -xj/po J.luo -Xrjj \o -yxc'i cvjtJ-oiii<. 'iJ' ;-•<.'!&» -'ff* «I | I bo- jot JO ooj 'to I iunvvt^c- ji)r .rt f;;*tIi>o\r tbo RJ. a ii-iodr, f r.Ll^fb ,o jco. ybn-xo*.Xs> ai 1 ‘4*.j ^neljB-i;p na o'£t? :;;oi, .C'Xij nxic 1 jr-x j:.;ro..oo bx'j x.&au !■ Junroor/ sbo'ijooX© . .^'XOxk;BCF.j-f'. ono si arxiji-.os^X'i; oi.i bii^ iJ^IoXP t-'X */ Al 'S ? • - . o Vrt rv-'rr J,.' ■ ■ r r _ •: 0 • -r: 0 t r-i iO -■ i ■'T ‘ At o no 0 Oi 0 r o' “' a ^ t^. ,^- •P gr. (.* * 1 I’AtpXM :X?^X _^0 AX. A ^ o fiX' j. j-'V ; OV-,(jA Ooi fxi -XIOOH' .<■ vJjiCXl ;..: sro/ Oi/X/'i*:® !*■ .'i. OA.: ;:‘.A '"i ■•*‘03^0 X - •V ^ 'to opj vcrol Vu -. oj jj ar\..: :.x:j ’X'.' ,| b- . ' .■ ■rXrfo..oo t.-. j jo AoJiuIcvS or'j nJ ij, '.a o.'XJ 'tC' no.' JOs.n.lnoi | I x ‘ s '..'XvJofc ^ 5 cr vIi,o. t> v.'^r. AoIjo^jA/vj 'xo 6 . 'x;oL..b ; x!t . •jJ’A'iv |^ a ,'^’*1 - ' Xi ':r. Js.-n .['‘■xx’.fyr . jxi edi oi • : .b .-x;. .v ajj Ov'Troxrx ‘xxinr,on ■ j.w J J oii/jxic o ; ‘ - . " . f "oi/,o I 'tc o'-,’ ‘Jilj uAft..;'' , ; 'urjS'rrfloJt t • _■ v-;?p r,; xxr Jv-o^x ix> 000.00 oxii jX 3 j J x; cj, /' ' 'X?*ifW i “tlA: : A.; *. ' At.Ax; nojjj. rjb nj .' rii'ixii jxi ‘ 0 ;'VJ . 0 ; bx-iC'O xili j \ J.;:o '■ ' . '■''" - ft, j i 1? A jL o 0 i ;■ . i. '. 1 ... ,7 .'■ n/ 0 f I _r 4- • £■ . J ul. s 1.0 L j 5 By measuring the potential difference between manganese and solutions of a manganese salt v/ithrespect to different ion concentrations, the electrode potential may be calculated by means of Nernst's equation given above. Due to the reactivity of the metal in acqueous solutions direct measurements cannot be made. Lewis and Keyes (Jour. Am. Chem. Soc. 3^0, 19^^) determined the potential of lithium by first measuring the poten- tial between lithium and lithium amalgams and then the potential of lithium amalgam with respect to the normal calomel electrode obtaining good results. Carrara and Agostini Elektrochem- 1 1 , 385 » 1905 ) have measured the electromotive force of metals in acqueous and aicohS)lic solutions expressing the relation between the two as EP — ITIP ~ 1 os ^w •^W -"-^a nP in which EP, and EP^ ^-re th®- electrolytic potentials in water V7 ci and alcohol, respectively, and P^ and P^^ the solution pressures of the metals iin each solution. According to the authors the value of the fraction is the same for all metals. These KT constitute the more important indirect ways of measuring the potentials of metals . 6 HISTORICAL. B. Neumann (Zelt. phislk. Chem. J_4, ^93- 230, 1894) measured the electrode potential of manganese amalgams in different manganese solutions. The system he measured consisted of (MnSO, ) Mn^Hg j MnCl^ indiff .Salt , 3 CL^ 1.0n KCl, Hg 2 Cl 2 , Hg. The results he obtained for the electrode potential of manganese was -1.0 • This determination has not been considered as satis- factory. Since then no attempts to determine the potential of the metal have been made . )lsUy. -xr i ■’t. j .1 V- j'. ( ^ C ( t . J '•£ f t j'l. O' £'■'■■ : i : , ■n-'-.v/' ''i lo I / ■• - • ' t \ ! ' nn-'-T. - '.'I ■;%. ) i- . ' ' ' ' * ■ 5* I r ; * ' ’ .'I . -i; “ '■ ^ * ’ - ■ ^ ^ .1 'J* - ^ ' f '-J *. Jw' ’iW ' <* ^ i ■ 0 - ■ * ,4 ' » . y 4 ir/-i 3 re Q oilT . - Sj’,.V * ■' .i ^i^d” T( 7 EXPERIMENTAL. Apparatus • Electrode potential measurements were made with a student potentiometer. This type being of a very simple design, the accuracy of it had to be detemined. The apparatus was standard- ized by means of the decade-box type potentiometer. The results obtained showed that equally accurate measurements could be made with the student potentiometer as with the more accurate decade- box type. The diagram of "the connections are given in Fig. 1. in which P is the potentiometer, R the resistance box to regulate the curpent so that only O.OOl ampere flows through the circuit, B the storage battery and G- the galvanometer. A double pole double throw switch was used so that at any time reference to the standard cadmium cell could be made. The reference ceil used was the standard cadmium cell. The cell consists of an H shaped vessel as shown in Fig. 2. It consists of, (0 mercury, (2) paste of cadmium sulphate and mercurous sulphate, (3) saturated solution and large crystals of cadmium sulphate, (4) cadmium amalgam, (5) small crystals of cadmium sulphate, (6)paraffin, (7) corh and (8) sealing wax. The latter three keep the vessel air tight. The potential of this cell is 1,0186 volts at 20 Conductivity measurements were made by the standard method of Kohlrausch. In Fig. 3 the diagram of connections is given. S is the Slide v;ire bridge, R is the known resistance, T the telephone receiver. The induction coil gives the necessary alternating current for the measurements. The coil is actuated by the storage battery B. 8 Figure 3 . 9 The conductivity vessel used is of the type shov/n in Fig* 4* The two plates P are circular platinum plates which have been coated with platinum black* This is done electrolyticaiiy from a platinizing solution, by passing a current through the solution for ten minutes, its direction being reversed every half minute. The electrodes are then thoroughly washed with dilute sulphuric acid and passing a current through the solution for 15 minutes reversing the current every minute. This removes the last traces of piatanizing liquia and also any occluaea gases. The sLanaard electrode vessel was of the type shown in Fig. 5* At the bottom was a sma-ll amount of mercury (1) and (2) was calomel paste in one tenth normal potassium chloride and the liquid above was one tenth potassium chloride saturated with calomel. The funnel shaped reversoir above the tv7o way stop-cock contained some of the tenth normal pots-ssium chloride to flush the side arm of any liquid which may have diffusdd up. The potential of this electrode is C.536C volts. For the non-acqueous solutions the same type cell wasused except that the calomel paste was mixed With lithium' chloride and the solution above the paste was absolute alcohol saturated with lithium chloride. The potential of this cell was C.11S5 volts as compared to the tenth normal calomel electrode. For determining the potential of metals the electrode vessel as shown in Fig. 6 wasused. The metal for which the electrode potential wasto be measured waspiaced in the bottom and contact was made by a seaied-in-giass platinum wire. The two half cells are connected by immersing the side arms in a saturated solution of potassium chloride. The saturated solution eliminates the rate.' a. flV. ■I V.‘ .‘ilJ 1 I itt'oj bv-^ri . ' ;.irr.’ ... -Jv]; ; o'»* uujf -- xro-i'i To-: jOv;Xo anol; Hi -iliV: U.^v jboJ'-'^o iTC.! Xn-'^Xifo ' 'n s.^ '^Cf ,:ioluDlr;-; ^4 1..L- . iIaiI ^ritiu uoiJo I'li i. 10 Fig. 4 . 3 1 1 Fig. 7. tn 12 liquid junction potential. For standardizing the silver-silver chloride electrode the dipping hydrogen electrode was used. Hydrogen is passed into the electrode at A and passes down the tube into the solution at the bottom of the vessel, saturating the solution around the platini izfed platinum electrode P with hydrogen ions. The excess gas escapes at B. T/^Taen measurements are taken the flow of hydrogen is by-passed into the air and the vessel closed at B, the hydrogen in the vessel therefore being at atmospheric pressure. or!^ ebo*iJ“0dI© 9d^ snixi5)»iiif>ni54a ':o% atii ftoenA'i dJt .doau €»» 9hr^:Jabie na^otijyfi * ' • ' ,_. • aiW* 4^ noUuLoa ^»rf4 q4(tl stff/4> ^fiS: i\fU)lb aoca^q bo«s> A i# «C‘d,^4oeX-i . <4 ^ ‘,‘'"uit.t4«iq «rf4 nnuort-Q 11014^0 3 .^^4 ^ fiiUt io ^o44o(3 4ii^£ .a.idr' ii4itw % Iq, bisJ^ -^ )* ’ JvS' naao'iflvT^ri. W^XI ari4 n^^s4 e4nabio»xii;.aii«»ct <4»i JtJ" ■• O-"" * ■ " . U ■ 0;:;':,^ £T , ’ 'r :: ‘ : ^ ' Oil c .■ ~ jo cs(?'i'~ .' ■•- \C Hb . 3 4#; .'tiw ‘I -iilj "eWgi »;" i>i-. 'lo ’^1 U *lo :i 0)u:.iir. P.CF. I _.G' . n»'W . , :...- i,;-; Zo hn . C- ,, .vior;»J-0 - Ok « ' . --■■^ . ^^l*»v . « ■. ->1,,^ ^ 0y^;.^ j ij ;j ,» X ‘ ^ '■t'fl ”-•3 SijiiV' i’iu^ II’.; ‘J • ur;$5! .ij"=?^^rf ..'KCt-^IR t 3oJ'-"o. j..,: J-u. i- nixT ■tcluj. j':' ■; •:•■■ ro:.;:; • . . orj' .<,/ j 'Av^Wi^•: c-’iV Xr^'Se' -'mJ’OOXo- :. .'J no' .••■ .Ill . :c j.J’-oMx'rr'iioO 3‘i^ " in ■’^.^ luiio CJi.ls •!■ ■ ‘■ivJ''' ' . ■ " ■•m ■ ' J -rcLf?' ••o-io'i, - / i.«ioa •jJ' .:.,Li;jJon ... .: .; i . , ' ■ -; ojiL:: tfiU '.r .^:Jt^.. Tlncs^ r>uiSJ .i*- llJii Oiij J Lr-.j'ix.ii Jf_i. _J.l' ’ --ik'vX y I'uX^ iirtOx •- -’ii/i rt^Jo; r .r • .:-:hw •. .-p.'i;: '• -j --•Ip.. . . ■xj.--') i'j.j-j-nji 5/tJl A'i£>-‘'i' / \ 3-.-vrooo:^ ^ a;W‘ :;o:J'iJjiii*, Ho O.O.; ■ • j Ji/ 'i rf ‘ ‘O x . poa£ ao.^:w::;j i'i# 14 a dark deposit by using the silver as the anode in a dilute Sodium chloride solution to which a small amount of hydrochloric acid had been added. This electrode was standardized against hydrogen in one hundredth normal hydrochloric acid and found to have a value of C.45b3 volts, this reading being the average of a number of determinations . The anhydrous manganese chloride was prepared by tv^o different methods. The first sample was prepared by passing hydrochloric acid gas over heated hydrous manganese chloride. The hydrochloric acid gas was prepared by treating pure sodium chloride with pure concentrated sulphuric acid and then thoroughly dried by passing the gas through concentrated sulphuric acid and calcium chloride. This did not eliminate any impurities which may have been in the original salt so the anhydrous salt was prepared by direct union of the elements. The manganese was finel^r divided by crushing. Chlorine gas was prepared by oxidizing concentrated hydrochloric acid with potassium permanganate and washing tv/ice with water to remove any hydrochloric acid gas and then drying by passing through concentrated sulphuric acid calcium chloride. The man- ganese was placed at one end of a long tube and strongly heated. All air was first removed by passing chlorine through the tube for Some time. A strong current of chlorine was kept flowing over the heated manganese. The manganese chloride sublimed at the other end of the tube and then collected. Manganese chloride of veryhigh purity was obtained by this method. Absolute alcohol was prepared by redistilling 95 % ethyl alcohol over pure cs-lcium oxide. The conductivity of the absolute r ;■ i I 1 ./ J- : xat.ti - sto! *> . * ! •; i: ? .^■•.^'•; ‘ . ■■ i ’•'. i'. 'J'-^ U' '•. 'i J ot ,[ -1 ,' ,j.ti , ; J)i .'^;i off 1 r,(i^ T'./x: j_. jc'i ‘ ' 'ii T-ti'roiv . i.j. -L, rri^4 :AfJ . .•*: ; .; , .-Ix-.v’ '-■•c'.. " Ir . ' i. , • V r.‘ ■■r;. J-i.*"/' j‘- 'i l f T-' ■•/•. r . M ' ' o • r. c* X r. n..i c • > '»' t :i ';-■•* r.ioc .'i.yO; -'rf f»'-*^q8*£ + *. •;*; sj. ;■; ’i ' .•eDoxiffem ■ - • ‘:.i. ^ ^';'<.'i; '.'Y j! ^) ' J- : ': ^ •• • -. 1 . -sff vrT ' *v Sl,.^ ■ V . ■ ' ' ': \(i ' ’ ... j- r.-M it ■: . C) ^ .t- X ■■■ 'i t ' ff . j . ;■. . i* jio.o , I ♦ * >, # ^» J '• T % ^ J a :i ...i V ,( Y*')- x,:*Jx,:V >' 'i ,‘ • 41 W W*.' ; ■ ' .! ixOo-i . Yii X o ffi-Vi ffi „ orr. i '• - .'• ■ ' ■'• -'Oi J ‘ o.r , ' ■■ ■ f . i . w ... .. -Iti U'-t' xO. P.ffq, *5' I ’i ■“u - . I , . . . ... ;. ■' ■•-'* •' ^ U.' to' ^ .', '. .'. J •■ Irf ^ ' '/fu-'i r. ':o. 6 iV : .. ;•. •. c^£. > •.•?■•.• ■’»:j t . \ ■ .’.'..Vi J Ci’T _ I '•-S’ .. : ' . \ ' ;ox 4 sJ ■riff io i*i •: a ' V-' •■•’ ^'- ‘‘ '•• * •■■ , ffi a 3 ffn. ,'t'iv *: 'r., V* « 7 ; ij; '■. t Jj .',JA ■ • *A ’-0 tM - J t i . J 1 . :. X ‘ ari'ffStf . 15 alcohol was 2.151 x lo" Manganese chloride stock solution in absolute alcohol was prepared by weighing out an accurate amount of the anhydrous salt and dissolving it in the alcohol- The concentration of this solution was accurately determined by the silver chloride precip- itation method. The more dilute solutions were prepared from this stock Solution. The metal manganese was prepared by electrolyzing a concen- trated Solution of manganese chloride in either water or absolute betv/een platinum electrodes. A hard coating of the metal formed on the cathode v/hich was then thoroughly washed and dried. Due to the great reactivity of the pure metal it had to he prepared immediately preceding electrode measurements. JMgS"CTa.ar.' "'’h r. %*>d j1 X ■. . Qm« ^Ji^iostrs ni nom^iio^ ’ ■• fy •■ si’ '. ,To e«5 yj;i;0pr/ xi» jifo;^oidJ5iS»^Vf r/ x!t» Jwo XoidSi&^Y^f aXiitf 10 {K>I ^^I,^vI^^J^i& tViA .Ji/w .,-Kylo^^q {,b •'I97I18 e|li.HP * r m A ^ A- '«ur ’^'#v^ ^ J> ^ ^ ^ A. t£ @ 16 Results . In measuring the electrode potential of zinc against the Silver-Silver chloride electrode, thepure finely divided metai was used. The observed voltages of the cell Zn, ZnClg, AgCl, Ag in the concentration noted are given belov/. The values given are the results of determinations made on different samples prepared under different conditions. The concentration of the zinc chloride solution was one hundredth normal. Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 . 1628 1.1580 1 . I600 1 . I605 1 . 1649 1.1563 t . 1629 1.1550 1 . 1610 1 . 1607 1 .1647 1 . 1572 1 . 1620 1 . 158c 1 . 16 lo 1 . I605 1 . 1652 1 .1580 The results are typical of the electrode potential of thii cell inasmuch as they agree even closer than some data that were previously obtained. While only the values for one concentration are given here, this gives an indication of the lack of constancy between different' ceils of the same concentration • The results did not warrant the adoption of this method for a, class room experiment in preference to the amalgamated zinc method. In taking up the work of determining the electrode potential of manganese in absolute alcohol it first became necessary to find the degree of ionization of manganese chloride. The degree of ioniza.tion is determined by making conductivity measurements of several solutions of various concentrations. In this way A may be detemined by extrapolation. The data given represents the average of a number of determinations . ->y."'T?i |C i '-'ll', '■■'■/. ■'. / 0 ;!'’’ .'■’r'''. . \ 1 X ■ I ' '' ' ^ t iC-' •.,. . . i.’,.-' ; ■c ■ '' X" 4 . ;xi . ' Jiov ' 1' .' i o' ^or' k. 4 1 ,r • — , < > .« ■* ■aA3 • * * ' oc .*■ til I k..r. J.I r* <1 f , r K’ * 1' f »'■ ^'>1 . r I i T'f, r'.' • . t -■ . Cl O’ 0 • -.^0 - OO'X oX-.. ' - ■';oX C l !• >■ : -.-Jw I ( ‘ ■ - ■ ’- ■ %X'Ui.-’ :o;J 0 '■ ^ • -4 , * 0 . - : ■ ;oi.' x * ■_ X 6 ■JC";' '’h':/ ■''o : :■.: Vix ' . < • • -1 . . «iu *1,*,--^ O' Xi ' X to'o:] \ -• ' 0 . 0 « - ’• • 0 , no. : '.i. ■. '.) . !' ■ X OCX: ' :J;:o - 0 ; A • '( V '■.: i!0iju5.xnci lo .*1 .:•. ;; "f.oi 'io 'Z-,. -ij.'’., b ;■•::• •Ifoiw ' ',;o 'j«| . .^>,. • Zj- : o . X ‘*-i) io .1 lo 18 c A (X 0 . 1 0.695 4.80 0.053 0.01 0 . :^- 4 o 1 1 . 6 c 0.129 o.ool 0.173 30.20 0.335 By extrapolating A-^owas found to be 90*0 It v/as very evident from the start that potential measure- ments of manganese in acqueous could not be made. Short circuiting several manganese electrodes in a manganese chloride solution showed the reactivity of the metal, the latter dissolving readily in the acqueous solution. The next attempt in measuring the electrode potential was by means of solutions of manganese chloride in absolute alcohol. Manganese electrolyzed from an acqueous solution was made up and measurements attempted. This metal was very reactive with alcoholic solution* so v/as dropped. Manganese prepared by electrolyzing it from a dry solution of manganese chloride in absolute alcohol v?as next tried. Not a.s good a deposit was obtained but the reactivity of the metal v/asso small that the fact was neglected and electromotive force measurements made. The data obtained quickly showed that even this slight reaction had a very decided effect. The electrode potential quickly dropped from the time the metal and solution were brought in contact. The readings were taken as soon as possible after the cell had been set up in order to obtain the maximum value of the electrode potential. The values for the system, L'In, cn IvInCl 2 aic.,sat.KCl ale. LiClsat,Kg 2 Cl 2 alc. Kg are given belov;. ' T T . i ' . ■ •jt' f'J b.’ui, i .•■■‘•/, ..i ••iJ'X'? yfi :. nJ . f.-'r i '•/-‘‘V .'"I « i*iS .tcir.' ' Jj'oc -i-. j: ', f ‘' *a3n ■ ’ ; ‘;.".'-ivi X' . a* '.i" ,1-K- -•:" ; :vi4.oso-. -.i -bi -[).■■-' • ! ' ■*’ i •■ B - cta; ..' Itx :...* •. 1. ^ J v/liO oa.v>..v*-.a^iu ;» .• • ;. .: « .•. -:• • ., Co.: r.- y,0‘ri ^ . -.J:'" fc* ^ ;>.u iync;.\ rl-.Tf' v , h -• ■•'* ■ - ^ ^ -3 ■*. ... .; „ J'-'X*^ 0'3 ,.SB Jv ij V .'vX .:.'jjl..:j ifiJtiivntiMi xb . ..t ;x.:, ::X*i!iaq> •■ M :.1 v'XJooXs 'Jisa^x* ■;. j - A'... , ;i..'- 1: 3vro.-; ’’uft . VJ >> , . • .. • 4 - ^ .- • . .. .i’ '•:!.■ a *. , • :x" ;,r.vXi<'iv^‘T '■>.'. »■ r •' j 9 1 . . ,1 *- ] ■ ; •.> .'• t -r oii7 H t'-.iXAll-; .T . .axa j :... . X j^ICir, ,;:k •'-■*^' ■ ’ , . • • ' ' h: Hi g uv 19 0.1 n LlnCl^ 0.9815 C.9794 0 . 0 I n I^nClg 0.9520 0.9380 0.9653 0.9280 0.9142 0.9504 0.9363 0.8974 0.8758 0 . 86 16 0.7770 0.8423 It will be noted that the maximum value for the tenth normal solution is 0.9815 volts and for th& one hundredth normal 0.9520 volts. These maximum values are reproducible and v/ere obtained with each nev7 attempt* The difference in potential between the two solutions 0.0295 volts is the theoretically correct difference for a tenfold change in concentration of a bivalent ion and evidently shows that electrode potential measurements are possible in non-acqueous solutions for manganese. It is very evident though that absolute alcohol cannot be used due to its reactivity with the pure electrolytic metai . It seems that the reactivity is due to the OH radical as there is quite an evolution of gas similar to that obtained in acqueous Solutions. Other organic solvents as acetone, ethyl amine, propyl amine have been used in electrode potential measurements and show promise of giving more conste.nt results. The necessity of finding a more inert solvent is very evident. Due to a lack of time it was possible to try out any organic solvents. 1 - i , I f) ■*> -5 ‘ j C' ; /. i ' X 'iiX " •; ‘^■ v|i.' ■/ 'I."?: Uu , ... ... . j ■ oiJ ^vjt J.^.: .,.. va 7iir •■". ! • /■_ .rX;. -i' .... I.'. ‘.'t K)no ■ * * 0. ./ ‘iJIvV C' ndiX'.ic.s j i ■ ’Ofi .:'!J\V hi .J - - ' 0.0 i.i' ’ ^ '- • •’’“X'l'X-' ! >'i 0 ' ’• i3r;r . uaoii'T'' • n'X.l ->v , j ' 'C ' u i ^ oi'.i j ^ , i-' . i V ' r ■ A i -■ ‘j 1 .’ . f •• '• 4oi -i..,o :j ...jJ' -*x .Jf «v ■ ‘ '-• ’ ■ ■ '■' ^O' fi' J'-‘ ''X.l;:, Oi op ;t.» ''C. J ^ i0( ‘ ■V ,ii .o.’o- o:?.f ' ' ■ ^ 'iol ■i*J ■{.- U. 0 ?V-' v-f-:ry' .■; T • :: ■ -.ion nif: tJ'i : J ■■‘ d "li-ark'O ■!.,.• r. '■'i ' .Miii ,'.J ('. ■ Ojj . ;,' ■. Ou ■■J .i jio'ij- -j ‘ r ■•-.'X :!xiw J . u^‘‘I.aij'' c. *'.‘06 cTj ij Ji: ; 'r-'i 0 -/xrno.;: . 'C. V. i. ..ii. J,!;.;. A. X ''- 1. Xi" J '■ X. y*. XhJA .-K .“I — •u M . ( •0 • - J '' ii •' u) '< IK ■ . X' . Vi ••/ V .:f< . ! ■■; v‘iC;U' j . -iil-VX ,...• .%;iv.;rpv Ji.ry oX oJ • ,1 V . Xff , r Ji li A 20 ACKNOVJLEDGMENT . The writer wishes to take this opportunity to thank Dr. Gr. Dietrichson under whose direction this work v^as carried on for his valuable suggestions and criticisms and for the personal interest he has taken in this work.