II B R.AR.Y OF THE U N I VERS ITY OF ILLINOIS G3O.7 cop MRICULTURE The person charging this material is responsible for LI61 O-1096 75 M 6-44 28133 SOIL TREATMENTS FOR WINTER WHEAT A SUMMARY OF FIELD EXPERIMENTS v- c\\ N&/K ! YJJ v u AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATKON. :\' , v .' ' CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 175 PLAN OF EXPERIMENTS 176 Fields Where Tests Were Made 176 Systems of Soil Treatment 177 Soil Conditions On Test Fields 178 Cropping Methods Used 179 WHAT LONG-TIME EXPERIMENTS SHOW 179 Inherent Differences in Soil Productivity 179 Effectiveness of Soil Treatment 181 Part Played by Each Treatment Material 183 Manure and crop residues 184 Limestone 185 Phosphates 185 Potash 191 Effect of Long-Continued Treatment 191 EFFECT OF DIRECT FERTILIZER APPLICATION 194 Effect of Materials Applied Alone and in Combination 194 Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizers Top-Dressed 195 Effect of Different Nitrogen Carriers 197 Effect of Mixed Fertilizers Applied Directly 197 Tests Using Experimental Phosphates 199 Effects of Productivity Levels on Usefulness of Fertilizers 200 BEST METHODS OF APPLYING FERTILIZERS 202 RELATION OF SOIL TREATMENTS TO OTHER YIELD FACTORS. .204 Insect Damage Reduced by Fertilization 204 Effect on Wheat Lodging and on Clover Stands 205 Effect of Soil Treatment on Wheat Quality 207 Fertile Soil Provides Insurance Against Failures 208 CONCLUSIONS: SUGGESTIONS TO WHEAT GROWERS.. ..209 Urbana, Illinois July, 1944 Publications in the Bulletin series report the results of investigations made or sponsored by the Experiment Station Soil Treatments for Winter Wheat A Summary of Field Experiments By L. B. MILLER, Assistant Chief in Soil Experiment Fields, and F. C. BAUER, Chief in Soil Experiment Fields WHEAT is an important field crop in Illinois. It is seeded on about one-tenth of the cropland and ranks fourth in crop t values. It is easily fitted into crop rotations, is a satisfactory companion crop for legume seedings, and is a reliable cash crop for many farmers. As a cover crop it has considerable value, providing protection against erosion and nutrient losses. Its heaviest require- ments for labor come at a time when other field work is not urgent. For these and other reasons wheat production is well established in the agricultural economy of this state. Illinois wheat growers are confronted with wide variation in acre- yields, ranging from failures and near failures to more than 50 bushels an acre. The average yield for the state during the years 1933-1942 was only 17.9 bushels. Altho there are a number of reasons for low yields, soil conditions are an important one. Compared with other commonly grown nonlegume grains, wheat ranks high in total percentage of certain plant nutrients, especially nitrogen and phosphorus (Table 1). This characteristic makes it some- what sensitive to nutrient deficiencies in the soil and rather responsive to practices that conserve, maintain, and increase the soil's supply of usable nutrients. Variations in soil productivity and increasing impoverishment of the soil make it essential for Illinois wheat growers to give more atten- tion to the treatment of their soils. Treatment systems designed to raise productivity levels, direct fertilizer applications at planting time, or a TABLE 1. NUTRIENT ELEMENTS IN NONLEGUME GRAINS* Crop Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium Calcium Magnesium Total Wheat.. . perct. . ... 2 . 20 perct. .41 .36 .37 .37 .27 Perct. .43 .48 .49 .47 .34 perct. .04 .08 .04 .05 .02 perct. .15 .12 .10 .12 .13 perct. 3.23 3.00 2.87 2.85 2.54 Oats 1.96 Rye ... 1.87 Barley 1 . 84 Corn 1 78 Average of analyses from several sources. 175 176 BULLETIN No. 503 combination of these methods is needed. This publication reviews and summarizes the field experiments conducted by the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station dealing with the effects of these practices on the yields of winter wheat. PLAN OF EXPERIMENTS Many of the data presented were obtained from twenty Illinois soil experiment fields ( Fig. 1 ) . The other data were obtained in cooperative experiments with farmers. Fields Where Tests Were Made The Illinois experiment fields that provide information for this study were established twenty-five to thirty years ago. They were designed primarily for the study of the merits of different systems of soil treatment and were located on soils varying widely in productivity. Fig. 1. Location of soil experiment fields furnishing data for this publi- cation. The twenty experiment fields on which the long-time studies were made are widely distributed over the state and represent a wide range of soil conditions. 1944~\ SOIL TREATMENTS FOR WINTER WHEAT 177 Many of the fields had additional space on which supplementary tests could be made with specific fertilizer materials. Systems of Soil Treatment Nine soil treatments were established on each experiment field four of them illustrating those that would be used in livestock farming and five illustrating those for grain farming. Still being used, these treatments, with the symbols to represent them, are as follows: Plot Treatment symbol Treatment materials Manure (Livestock) Systems 1 None 2 M Manure 3 ML Manure, limestone 4 MLrP Manure, limestone, rock phosphate Residues (Grain) Systems 5 None 6 R Crop residues 7 RL Crop residues, limestone 8 RLrP Crop residues, limestone, rock phosphate 9 RLrPK Crop residues, limestone, rock phosphate, potash The field procedures used in handling the treatment materials are as follows: None. All top growth of crops was removed. Manure. Animal manure, including litter, was applied in proportion to the weight of the crops grown during the previous rotation and was plowed under for the corn crop. Crop residues. The residues of crops, including corn stover, grain straws, green sweet clover, and the second crop of legume hays, were plowed under at convenient times. During some years the grain straws were removed. Limestone. Crushed limestone was applied initially at the rate of 4 tons an acre and thereafter once during each rotation at the annual rate of i/ ton an acre on plowed soil, usually ahead of wheat. After twelve years this procedure was discontinued. No limestone has been applied to the dark- colored soils since, but a 2-ton application was made to the light-colored and sandy soils during the past few years. Rock phosphate. Finely ground rock phosphate was applied once during the rotation, usually at wheat seeding time, at the annual acre-rate of 500 pounds. Applications ceased after a total of 4 tons an acre had been applied. Only a small amount of rock phosphate has been applied since 1924. Potash. Kainit (containing about 12 percent of K 2 O) was applied once during the rotation at the rate of 200 pounds an acre a year, usually ahead of wheat. Since 1932, muriate of potash (50 percent K 2 O) has been 178 BULLETIN No. 503 [/w/y, used at annual rates ranging from 50 to 100 pounds, usually half ahead of wheat and half ahead of corn. These systems have involved a step-by-step build-up from no treat- ment to somewhat complex combinations. Long used and modified to some extent by the cropping system employed, they have tended to establish different levels of productivity, the limits of which are de- termined by the nature of the soils. Crop yields reveal the effects of the soil treatments and thus furnish an index to the needs of the various kinds of soil. Recent modifications on several of the fields supply data on fer- tilizers and methods of application not used in the original systems of treatment. The various productivity levels established by the original treatments provided a wide range of conditions under which these sup- plementary tests have been made. Soil Conditions on Test Fields The soils on which the experiment fields are located may be classi- fied in 10 of the 16 Illinois soil groups as follows. 1 The year in which the field was established is indicated in parentheses. I. Very dark, moderately heavy soils with moderately permeable sub- soils: Aledo, Mercer county (1910). II. Very dark heavy soils with moderately permeable subsoils, car- bonates shallow: Hartsburg, Logan county (1911); Minonk, Woodford county (1910). III. Dark soils with moderately permeable subsoils: Kewanee, Henry county (1915). IV. Moderately dark soils with moderately permeable subsoils: Dixon, Lee county (1910); Mt. Morris, Ogle county (1910). V. Moderately dark soils with grayish cast, slowly permeable sub- soils: Carlinmlle, Macoupin county (1910); Carthage, Hancock county (1911); Clayton, Adams county (1911); Lebanon, St. Clair county (1910). VI. Dark soils with slowly permeable subsoils, carbonates shallow: Joliet, Will county (1914). VII. Gray, strongly leached soils with very slowly permeable sub- soils: (A) Slick spots infrequent Ewing, Franklin county (1910); Oblong, Crawford county (1912); Toledo, Cumberland county (1913). (B) Slick spots frequent Newton, Jasper county (1912). X. Yellowish gray, strongly leached soils with slowly permeable sub- soils: (A) Slick spots infrequent En field, White county (1912); Raleigh, Saline county (1910). (B) Slick spots frequent Sparta, Randolph county (1916). 'Classifications prepared by R. S. SMITH, Chief in Soil Physics and Soil Survey. 1944} SOIL TREATMENTS FOR WINTER WHEAT 179 XIV. Light-brown sands and loamy sand with slight subsoil devel- opment: Oquawka, Henderson county (1915). XVI. Yellow soils with slowly to moderately permeable subsoils: Elizabethtown, Hardin county (1917). Cropping Methods Used Most of the experiment fields were designed for four-year crop rotations. On many of them the crop sequence has been corn, oats, legume hay, and wheat, with a seeding of biennial white sweet clover for use as a green manure. On a few fields other sequences were used, but for most fields a regular biennial or perennial deep-rooted legume occupied the land one year in every four. Each field was so arranged that each crop in the rotation was grown every year, thus providing continuous annual yields of wheat and associated crops. WHAT LONG-TIME EXPERIMENTS SHOW Inherent Differences in Soil Productivity No carefully supervised tests are needed to prove that soils differ inherently in their capacity to produce crops. Those differences have long been observed. Tests are necessary, however, to show the extent of the differences. The long-time average yields of wheat from the untreated land in these tests ranged from 1 bushel to nearly 30 bushels an acre. Even tho adapted varieties were used in well-designed systems of cropping, the yields on the light-colored soils averaged less than 6 bushels an acre, ranging from 1 bushel to 8 bushels. Untreated dark-colored soils averaged 22 bushels an acre, the range being from 17 to nearly 30 bushels. The untreated land on one sandy field averaged less than 9 bushels, but in seasons of favorable moisture almost 20 bushels an acre were obtained (data not shown). Thus soils low in productivity often fail to return much more than the equivalent of the seed used, while highly productive soils, even without soil treatment, may return seed 20 to 30 fold when conditions are favorable. Altho differences in yields that accompanied differences in soils were narrowed considerably by soil treatment, there were no treat- ments that completely overcame the fundamental soil differences. The highest yields continued to come from those fields that gave the highest yields without any treatment (Fig. 2). 180 BULLETIN No. 503 [July, I M cu 3 .... en Q H) i g 2 04 09 H .2 fjoodiod t~-no\d dioin-o ^'vovoaTj; -< w 1 S 1 a 3 J -.>01/>!N^ vOM^-HVO t>!od-H-J d^vo'tood 3 g N X at O (Vj (NW50^ t^- <> -H d 3 ffl j ha 1 3 z; a >. i a, J rotations. E 4 R 1 -2 S 1 a a n severa i 5 CK J C 10 | I ncreas S o B M > i-) = 1 i * were ir (Long-time average en 1 I 25 I* 4 ^ hi 9 i i i ' , . oo oo o\ oo CSCS^CN^ ft5 t^ ^0000 tfl -HCS CN CN o 1942. >>Two crops of wheat 4 j 1 i Q 4 n j j 5 | c O : : : : : : : ;::: : ' : o S I 5 i i M a i 4 j H 2 31 g * * *Ioj>-) - 1 t c> | S "rt'I - *;j3;* Illll idfil IiJll lyn S fl C JD. OlOt~-< CStStNCSCN CSCSCS-H-H rt . WOOOOOI-- ^HC **'' S "' >N ^ :&* : :a :c ^_8 H1|3 Sl|l& Jftss - ,^ 5 - mil OOOHW 1944] SOIL TREATMENTS FOR WINTER WHEAT 183 Part Played by Each Treatment Material Since the systems of soil treatment used in these experiments in- volve a step-by-step build-up, it is possible to determine the separate effects of each material used. The data -on this point are given in Table 3. Most materials, it should be kept in mind, were used in association with other materials. If they had been used alone, larger or smaller effects might have been obtained. When two materials possess over- 4-0 35 30 25 O .2 s y O < 35^ JJ -MO S o OT