14.GS:
CIR273
c. 1
STATE OF ILLINOIS
WILLIAM G. STRATTON, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION
VERA M. BINKS, Director
Heavy Mineral Ratios of
Sangamon Weathering
Profiles in Illinois
John A. Brophy
DIVISION OF THE
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
JOHN C. FRYE, Chief URBANA
CIRCULAR 273
1959
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2012 with funding from
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
http://archive.org/details/heavymineralrati273brop
HEAVY MINERAL RATIOS
OF SANGAMON WEATHERING PROFILES
IN ILLINOIS
John A. Brophy
ABSTRACT
Heavy mineral ratios were studied to compare the degree
of weathering attained in buried Sangamon profiles developed on
Illinoian till with that in profiles developed on Illinoian outwash.
Grain sizes were determined and heavy minerals were analyzed for
59 samples from four sections. Two of the sections were from pro-
files developed on clayey till and two from profiles developed on
outwash, one of the latter being dominantly sand and gravel, the
other silt overlying sand, silt, and gravel. The sections sampled
had similar topographic positions so that differences in soil-form-
ing factors, other than texture of parent material, probably were
not great.
In terms of depletion of hornblende and garnet, the rela-
tively coarse-grained, open-textured outwash proved to be con-
siderably more weathered than the till. In the zone of greatest
weathering about 90 percent of the hornblende had been removed
from the outwash but only 60 percent had been removed from the
till. About 70 percent of the garnet also had been weathered from
the outwash, but the amount of garnet in the weathered till had not
been noticeably reduced.
In the till profiles the original illite and chlorite were al-
tered almost completely to montmorillonite.
INTRODUCTION
Previous investigations (Goldich, 1938; Dryden and Dryden, 1946) have
established that minerals differ considerably in their degree of stability in the
zone of weathering. Ruhe (1956) used this fact in setting up "weathering ratios" -
the ratio of number of grains of relatively stable minerals to number of grains of
relatively unstable minerals. He found that such ratios were higher in the upper
portions of profiles than in the parent material and that the difference was greater
in older profiles than in younger ones.
The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of variations
in texture of parent material on degree of weathering as measured by weathering
ratios. The relation of the weathering ratios to variations in clay mineralogy also
was studied. The study is based on Sangamon weathering profiles on Illinoian
drift.
I am indebted to George W. White, head of the Department of Geology,
University of Illinois, and H. B. Willman, of the Illinois State Geological Survey,
for supervision of the study; to R. T. Odell, Department of Agronomy of the Uni-
[1]
2 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
versity of Illinois, for discussion of pedological problems; and to Herbert D. Glass,
Illinois State Geological Survey, for discussion of problems of clay mineralogy.
PROFILE SELECTION
To evaluate the influence of the texture of the parent material on the de-
gree of weathering that had occurred in the Sangamon profiles, profiles were
chosen that exhibited great differences in parent material. Two of the profiles
were developed in till and two were developed in outwash. As nearly as could be
determined, there were only minor differences in the other factors of weathering,
as noted below.
Climate .- Within the sampling area (fig. 1), the climate probably was
reasonably uniform during the period of profile development.
Topography . - All the profiles studied were developed on flat or nearly
flat uplands.
Time . - All four profiles were developed on Illinoian drift after ice with-
drawal and prior to burial by Wisconsin age loess.
Biota. - There is little direct evidence, but it is assumed that if climate
and topography were similar, differences in biota would not have been great.
FIELD STUDY
The four profiles were described
(see appendix) and sampled vertically
according to zones that were recognizable
in the field (table 1 and fig. 2).
Table 1 . - Zonation of Buried Profiles
of Weathering
(Modified from Leighton
and MacClintock, 1930)
Zone
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
Description
Former surface zone, less clayey
than zone II. Generally shows
mixed-zone contact with overlying
loess.
Characterized by clay enrichment
and often by structural development; niinoion sections
pebbles, less common than in zone
III, are dominantly dense, fine-
grained silicates.
Oxidized and leached of carbonates,
Oxidized.
Apparently unaltered.
F- Flamingo
(till)
E- Effinghom
(till)
B- Breeds
(outwash)
C- Country Club
(outwosh)
Fig. 1. - Location of sections studied.
HEAVY MINERAL RATIOS OF WEATHERING PROFILES 3
LABORATORY METHODS
Standard pipette and screening methods were used to obtain grain-size
distribution data for all samples (figs. 3-6 and appendix table A). The very fine
sand (<. 125 mm >.062 mm ) was selected for heavy mineral studies because it
contained the highest concentration and the greatest variety of heavy minerals.
Part of the heavy-mineral yield of each sample was mounted in balsam, and a com-
bined total of 300 grains of garnet (Ga), zircon (Zi), tourmaline (To), and horn-
blende (Hb) was counted under a polarizing microscope.
SELECTION OF WEATHERING RATIOS
The high resistance to weathering of zircon and tourmaline and the low
resistance of hornblende are well documented (Jackson and Sherman, 195 3),
indicating that the ratio of zircon-plus-tourmaline to hornblende could be an
effective index of weathering. The literature is not in agreement, however, on
the resistance of garnet, so it was compared with high-resistance minerals by
using the ratio of zircon-plus-tourmaline to garnet, and with low-resistance min-
erals by using the ratio of garnet to hornblende. Weathering ratios for each
sample and grain counts from which they were calculated are listed in table B
of the appendix.
VERTICAL VARIATIONS IN WEATHERING RATIOS
Fe«tO
Top of
Songomon
20
30
35
40L
Figures 7 through 10 show curves produc
FLAMINGO
COUNTRY CLUB
Mi_x£d_49ne
Peorian
Loess
Farmdole
Loess
Zone 1
Zone D
Zone Iff
ZoneV
EFFINGHAM
Trons
i-n
Peorian
Loess
Zone I
Zone H
ZQne_H
Zone N
Zone V
BREEDS
Peorian
Loess
Mjxed zone
Zone I
Zone II
Covered
Trans'
I-H
Peorian
Loess
Farmdole
_Lpess_
Mixed - zone
Zone n
Zonem
ZoneS
to
ZoneY
Fig. 2. - Columnar sections correlated on top of
the Sangamon weathered zone.
ed by plotting weathering ratios
versus depth. The general pat-
tern of these curves is random
variation upward through zones
V, IV, and III, indicating little
or no weathering loss of horn-
blende or garnet in these zones.
Above zone III, however, marked
changes are evident. In the Fla-
mingo and Effingham till profiles,
the ratios of zircon-plus-tourma-
line to hornblende, and of garnet
to hornblende, show increases,
but the zircon-plus-tourmaline
to garnet ratio continues its ran-
dom variation. In the Breeds and
Country Club outwash profiles,
all three ratios increase in zones
II and I.
COMPARISON OF DEGREE
OF WEATHERING
In figures 11 and 12 the
weathering ratio curves have been
mathematically reduced to a com-
mon base for direct comparison.
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
PERCENT
Depth ft Zone Sample 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
_i i i i i I i i i i i i ' ' i i i ■ '
Fig. 3. - Grain size profile of Flamingo section.
Depth ft
Zone
Sample
PERCENT
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
_i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i 1_
2-
4
6-
8-
10-
12-
14-
16-
18-
20
22
Peorian Loess
E - 17
vvvvvvuyvvvvvvvvvvvvi; ; //////////////// /////// / /;/;,•/;/;/;;//////;// /r~
E- i < v.-
Clay
Silt
Sand
Gravel
Fig. 4. - Grain size profile of Effingham section.
HEAVY MINERAL RATIOS OF WEATHERING PROFILES 5
PERCENT
Depth ft Zone Somple 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
-I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _L I I I J I III!
Fig. 5. - Grain size profile of Breeds section.
Depth ft
PERCENT
Zone Somple 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
.iiiii i i i i i i i i i i i i i_
Fig. 6. - Grain size profile of Country Club section.
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28-
30
32
34
36
5 w
• OJ
o o
E
,o o
Mixed
m
I4<
E7
5<
6<
Weathering Ratios
.2 .4 .6 .8 1.0
• x
"I
r— ■
• xo
■
• X
Clay %
10 20 30 40
|%<; >xcloy|
% ?to2^i clay
12 3 45
Clay Mineralogy
= (X-ray data)
'»_
u. 7
o
o
>- 9
g io
UJ
CO M
t 12
UJ
° 13
14
15
16
17
"i 1 r
A-_ ~~ ~~
Sections
O o Flomingo
D □ Effingham
A — -a Breeds
X X Country Club
."5*
Wrl = Averoge weathering ratio for lowermost
3 somples (from horizon Y or n?-Y)
Wr2 - Weathering ratio for each higher sample
Fig. 11. - Comparative curves for
the ratio of zircon-plus-tourmaline
to hornblende.
Wr2
Wr I
3
D
h
Sections
O —
-o
Flamingo
□—
■D
Effingham
A—
-A
Breeds
X
-X
Country Club
Wrl = Average weathering rotio for lowermost
3 somples (from horizon V or BT-Y )
Wr2 = Weathering rotio for each higher somple
Feet
i
- □?
o
D \
S
m „
^n
_J 2
" °\D
u_
is! i
■ «/ °
2 4
o
r \ °
- \ Q T
- ^ A *
dl A, "
1 5
t 6
<
w -
J * 1
u. '
- 04; ,
° R
_ 4 \ '
0.
Vp yj.
O
\ -' 1
»- 9
5
g io
UJ
a'
\
I
1 1
•- .-
1 1 1
o- 12
UJ
" A 1
o .-.
1 1
13
"
14
"
15
r ? /
16
• '
17
A^
.--«■:
Fig. 12A. - Comparative curves for the
ratio of garnet to hornblende.
Fig. 12B. - Comparative curves for the ratio
of zircon-plus-tourmaline to garnet.
HEAVY MINERAL RATIOS OF WEATHERING PROFILES 9
The difference in degree of weathering between the till profiles and the
outwash profiles is striking. Not only has hornblende undergone considerably
more depletion by weathering in the outwash profiles (fig. 11), but garnet, which
shows no loss by weathering in the till profiles, has been partially weathered out
of the upper zones of both outwash profiles (fig. 12). Quantitatively, there has
been a loss of about 90 percent of hornblende in zone II of the outwash profiles
compared to a loss of about 60 percent in the till profiles. Loss of garnet is about
70 percent in the outwash compared to little or no loss in the till.
The depth to which carbonates are leached provides additional evidence of
the greater degree of weathering that has occurred in the outwash profiles. Depth
of leaching averages about 14 feet in the outwash but only about 7 feet in the till.
DISCUSSION
The observed differences in degree of weathering are considered to be re-
lated primarily to differences in texture of the parent material. The relatively
coarse-grained outwash sediments certainly would have been the more permeable
to weathering solutions, thus facilitating decomposition and removal of the solu-
ble products. In the relatively fine-grained till profiles slow percolation rates
would have allowed a higher percentage of the precipitation falling upon them to
run off or to be removed by plant transpiration. A number of pedologists (cited by
Jenny, 1941), following other lines of evidence, have observed the same relation-
ship of parent-material textures to soil development.
This study also indicated that the resistance of garnet falls between that
of hornblende and the zircon-tourmaline group, under the weathering conditions
that prevailed. More research is needed to determine why garnet is not depleted
in the till profiles.which have lost 60 percent of their hornblende, and yet is
strongly depleted in the outwash profiles, which have lost only 30 percent more
hornblende.
From this study and those of Ruhe (1956), weathering ratios appear to be a
promising method of evaluating profile maturity, especially in buried profiles where
standard pedologic tests of maturity may not work.
Clay Mineralogy
Zone II of the profiles is considerably enriched in clay (figs. 7-10). Ratios
of the percentage of minus ^-micron clay to \- to 2-micron clay show that most of
the clay added to this zone is in the minus ^--micron fraction. To determine the
relationship of this clay increase to the increase in the heavy mineral ratios, clay
mineral analyses were made of both till sections by Herbert D. Glass, using a
General Electric XRD 3 recording spectrometer. The results of the analyses are
graphed in figures 7 and 8 and are discussed below.
Clay minerals of zone V are predominantly illite and chlorite. Chlorite
begins to show alteration in the oxidized calcareous till (zone IV) and becomes
progressively more altered upward in the profile, changing first to mixed vermiculite-
chlorite, then to vermiculite, and finally, in zones II and I, to montmorillonite.
The first appearance of substantial illite alteration occurs somewhat higher in the
profile than that of chlorite, although illite probably is slightly altered at lower
levels. Illite goes through a mixed-lattice illite-montmorillonite stage, with
montmorillonite becoming more dominant upward in the profile until, in zones II
and I, alteration is nearly complete. Montmorillonite, therefore.is the clay mineral
producing the increased percentage of minus ^--micron clay in zone II.
10 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
The close correspondence between the base of the montmorillonite zone and
the base of the zone of hornblende depletion (essentially the base of zone II) sug-
gests that the montmorillonite may have acted as an acid clay in the breakdown of
the hornblende. Graham (1941) showed by experiments that montmorillonite as an
acid clay can be highly effective in weathering of minerals.
SUMMARY
Weathering ratio studies show that there can be considerable differences in
degree of weathering between Sangamon profiles developed in till and those devel-
oped in outwash. Because other factors of soil formation were about the same for
both till and outwash profiles, it is concluded that the differences in degree of
weathering were caused primarily by differences in texture of parent material.
In the profiles studied, the base of the zone of clay enrichment coincides
with the base of the montmorillonitic zone and the base of the zone of maximum
depletion of hornblende and garnet.
Weathering ratios seem to hold promise for evaluating maturity of weathering
profiles.
REFERENCES
Dryden, Lincoln, and Dry den, Clarissa, 1946, Comparative rates of weathering
of some common heavy minerals: Jour. Sedimentary Petrology, v. 16, no. 3,
p. 91-96.
Graham, E. R., 1941, Acid clay - an agent in chemical weathering: Jour. Geology,
v. 49, no. 4, p. 392-401.
Goldich, S. S., 1938, A study in rock-weathering: Jour. Geology, v. 46, no. 1,
p. 17-58.
Jackson, M. L., and Sherman, G. D., 1953, Chemical weathering of minerals in
soils: Advances in Agronomy, v. 5, p. 219-318, Academic Press, New
York, N. Y.
Jenny, H., 1941, Factors of soil formation: McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York,
N. Y.
Leighton, M. M., and MacClintock, Paul, 1930, Weathered zones of the drift
sheets of Illinois: Jour. Geology, v. 38, no. 1, p. 28-53.
Ruhe, R. V., 1956, Geomorphic surfaces and the nature of soils: Soil Science,
v. 82, no. 6, p. 441-455.
Shepard, F. P., 1954, Nomenclature based on sand- silt-clay ratios: Jour. Sedi-
mentary Petrology, v. 24, no. 3, p. 151-158.
Soil Survey Staff, 1951, Soil Survey Manual: U. S. Dept. of Agr. Handbook 18.
HEAVY MINERAL RATIOS OF WEATHERING PROFILES 11
APPENDIX
DESCRIPTION OF PROFILES
In the following descriptions, color determinations are from the Munsell
Soil Color Charts. Textural nomenclature is that devised by Shepard (1954). Clay
size is taken as < 2 microns. Where pebbles or coarser stones are important con-
stituents, the words "pebbly" or "cobbly" are added. Where these coarser con-
stituents are dominant, Shepard's system is not used.Pedologic textural nomen-
clature (in parentheses) and soil structure nomenclature are as recommended by the
Soil Survey Staff (1951). The term "gravelly" in pedologic textural nomenclature
is strictly a size term.
Flamingo Section
Location: Abandoned highwall of Fairview Collieries Flamingo Mine, NW{ SW^
NW| sec. 31, T. 8N., R. 3E., Fulton County, Illinois (Canton quad-
rangle) .
Sangamon topography: Broad, nearly flat upland divide, probably sloping slightly
to the northwest.
Elevation of Sangamon surface: 677'± (estimated from topographic map).
Exposure faces north, moisture content normal.
Description compiled from field and laboratory data:
Unit Aggregate
thickness thickness
(ft. in.) (ft. in.)
Peorian Loess
Modern soil at top, noncalcareous to 7 feet,
calcareous from 7 to 10 feet 10 10
Farmdale Loess
Yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) clayey silt (silt
loam), noncalcareous 2 6 12 6
Mixed zone
Yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) clayey silt (silty
clay loam), slightly more clayey than unit
above, a few scattered pebbles, noncal-
careous 1 13 6
Illinoian Till with Sangamon weathering profile
Transition, zone I to zone II
Dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) clayey silt
(silty clay loam), moderate fine sub-
angular blocky structure, clay skins on
peds, numerous large borings of crayfish
type, a few small pebbles, noncalcareous... 9 14 3
Zone II
Brown (10YR 4/3) clayey silt (silty clay loam),
more clayey than unit above, moderate fine
blocky structure at top to strong coarse blocky
structure at base; shows prismatic tendency
12 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
, , . , . , , (ft. in.) (ft. in.)
on dry face, clay skins prominent (color
above is that of clay skins, ped interiors
are brownish yellow [10YR 6/6]), a few small
pebbles, noncalcareous 2 3 16 6
Transition, zone II to zone III
Mottled 50 percent brownish yellow (10YR 6/6)
and 50 percent light olive gray (5Y 6/2)
sand-silt-clay (silty clay loam), very weak,
very coarse blocky structure, texture more
till-like than above, pebbles slightly more
numerous and larger than above, noncal-
careous 1 17 6
Zone III
Mottled brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) and light
olive gray (5Y 6/2) clayey silt (silty clay
loam) to pebbly sand- silt-clay (gravelly
loam), structureless, brownish yellow mottles
increase downward from about 50 percent to
about 90 percent; texture shows some effects
of water sorting (some sandy lenses and some
finer grained zones), pebbles larger and more
numerous than above, noncalcareous 2 5 19 11
Zone IV
Light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) pebbly sandy
silt (gravelly silt loam) to pebbly sand- silt-
clay (heavier gravelly silt loam); strong
brown (7.5YR 5/6) appears along joints at
6 feet and continues to base of zone IV;
matrix gradually changes downward from
light yellowish brown to light brownish
gray (2.5Y 6/2) near the base; contains
pebbles, cobbles and a few boulders,
calcareous 9 8 29 7
Zone V
Gray (5Y 5/1) pebbly sandy silt (gravelly silt
loam) to pebbly sand- silt-clay (heavier
gravelly silt loam), contact sharp with unit
above, though oxidation continues down
along joints; contains pebbles, a few cobbles
and a few boulders, calcareous 6 35 7
Covered below.
Effingham Section
(first described by Leighton and MacClintock [1930])
Location: North wall of drainage ditch, center sec. 6, T.7N., R. 6 E., Effingham
County, Illinois (Effingham quadrangle) .
Sangamon topography: Very flat upland divide.
Elevation of Sangamon surface: 577 '± (estimated from topographic map).
Exposure faces south, moisture content normal.
Description compiled from field and laboratory data:
HEAVY MINERAL RATIOS OF WEATHERING PROFILES 13
Unit Aggregate
thickness thickness
(ft. in.) (ft. in.)
Peorian Loess
Modern planosolic soil at top, noncalcareous. . 3 5 3 5
Farmdale?
Gray (10YR 6/1) sand-silt-clay (silt loam)
with black streaks, may be part of
Sangamon profile mixed with loess, noncal-
careous 7 4
Illinoian Till with Sangamon weathering profile
Zone I
Gray (10YR 5.5/1) sand-silt-clay (loam),
mottled 10 percent (at top) to 50 percent
(at base) with yellowish brown (10YR 5/6
to 5/8), a few quartz and chert pebbles,
noncalcareous 1 11 5 11
Zone II
Dark gray (10YR 4/1) to gray (10YR 5/1) sand-
silt-clay (loam to clay loam), yellowish
brown (10YR 5/6) mottling at top increases
downward until it becomes the predominant
color at about 2\ feet below top, structure-
less, clay decreases downward, pebbles
(mostly chert) larger and more abundant than
above but still not common, lower part grad-
ually transitional to zone III, many crayfish-
type borings, noncalcareous 5 1 11
Zone III
Yellowish brown (10YR 5/8) pebbly silty sand
(gravelly loam), mottled about 5 percent
with light gray (10YR 6/1), texture more
till-like, some thin sand and gravel beds
in this part of profile, noncalcareous 10 12
Zone IV
Light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) pebbly silty
sand to pebbly sandy silt (gravelly loam),
very compact, coatings of gray (N 6/0) on
vertical and horizontal fracture surfaces,
calcareous 1 5 13 5
Zone V
Gray (5Y 5/1) pebbly sandy silt (gravelly
loam), extremely compact, gray (N 5/0)
coatings on fracture surfaces, slightly
oxidized to grayish brown (2.5Y 5/2)
along joints, calcareous 7 6 20 11
Covered below.
14 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Country Club Section
Location: Abandoned highwall of Truax-Traer Fiatt Mine 2, now on property of
Wee-ma-tuk Country Club, SE^ SW} NW| sec. 2, T. 6 N., R. 3 E.,
Fulton County, Illinois (Canton quadrangle).
Sangamon topography: Essentially flat upland divide, may have had slight west-
ward slope.
Elevation of Sangamon surface: 660'± (estimated from topographic map).
Exposure faces north, moisture content normal.
Description compiled from field and laboratory data: TT .
Unit Aggregate
thickness thickness
(ft. in.) (ft. in.)
Peorian Loess
Modern soil at top, noncalcareous 8 8 8 8
Farmdale Loess
Dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) clayey silt
(silt loam), contains scattered flakes of
carbonaceous matter, noncalcareous 2 10 8
Mixed Zone
Brown (10YR 4/3) clayey silt (silt loam),
probably a mixture of Farmdale Loess and
zone I material of Sangamon profiles, non-
calcareous 12 11 10
Illinoian outwash with Sangamon weathering profile
Transition, zone I to zone II
Yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) to dark yellowish
brown (10YR 3/4) clayey silt (silty clay
loam), very weak medium subangular blocky
structure, clay skins on peds, some iron
oxide pellets ("buckshot"), noncalcareous.. 11 12 9
Zone II
Dark brown (10YR 4/3) silty clay (clay), mod-
erate medium subangular blocky structure,
clay skins on peds, noncalcareous 19 14 6
Zone II and Transition, zone II to zone III
Mottled light brownish gray (10YR 6/2), yel-
lowish brown (10YR 5/6), and black (N 2/0)
silty clay (clay), changing downward to
pebbly sand- silt-clay (gravelly clay loam),
weak, medium to coarse blocky structure,
contains resistant pebbles up to 2 inches
in diameter, noncalcareous 2 6 17
Zone III
Strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) cobbly, pebbly sand-
silt-clay (cobbly, gravelly clay loam to
sandy clay loam), structureless, some
indications of bedding, numerous large
borings of crayfish type extend about half-
way down, noncalcareous. This and the
HEAVY MINERAL RATIOS OF WEATHERING PROFILES 15
(ft. in.) (ft. in.)
units above may be the weathered remains
of a water-laid till or a very poorly sorted
outwash deposit 5 6 22 6
Units below are definitely outwash.
Interbedded sand and silt, noncalcareous,
(not sampled) 2 24 6
Multicolored but predominantly strong brown
(7 . 5YR 5/8) pebbly clayey sand (gravelly
sandy loam), noncalcareous 3 6 28
Zone IV to V
Light brown (10YR 6/4) sand (loamy sand),
clean, well sorted, calcareous 6 28 6
Interbedded sand and silt, calcareous,
(not sampled) 4 4 32 10
Multicolored but predominantly light brown
(10YR 6/3) sand (loamy sand), weak
iron oxide cementing, calcareous 10 33 10
Interbedded sand, silt, and gravel, cal-
careous (not sampled) 2 4 36 2
Multicolored, very poorly sorted water-laid
sediment, predominantly a very coarse
gravel, but containing all sizes from 2-foot
boulders to clay, calcareous 6 42 2
Silt and sand, calcareous (not sampled) 15 43 7
Covered below.
Breeds Section
Location: Gravel pit, SE{ NEj NWi sec. 33, T. 7 N., R. 5 E., Fulton County,
Illinois (Glasford quadrangle).
Sangamon topography: Essentially flat upland divide.
Elevation of Sangamon surface: 575'± (estimated from topographic map).
Exposure faces south, extremely dry.
Description compiled from field and laboratory data:
Unit Aggregate
thickness thickness
(ft. in.) (ft. in.)
Peorian Loess
Modern soil at top, lower foot or so maybe Farm-
date Loess (extreme dryness made differen-
tiation uncertain), very pale brown (10YR 7/4)
clayey silt (silt loam), noncalcareous 4 6 4 6
Mixed zone
Light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) clayey silt
(silty clay loam), noncalcareous 10 5 6
16 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
(ft. in.) (ft. in.
Illinoian outwash with Sangamon profile of weathering
Zone II
Dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) clayey silt
(silty clay loam), mottled with strong brown
(7.5YR 5/8); strong medium prismatic struc-
ture becoming coarse near base; large cray-
fish-type borings, clay skins prominent,
noncalcareous 2 6 8
Transition, zone II to zone III
Very pale brown (10YR 7/3) clayey silt (silty
clay loam), mottled with brownish yellow
(10YR 6/6), moderate very coarse blocky
structure, a few clay skins, noncalcareous.. 6 8 6
Zone III
Same as unit above, but less clayey, struc-
tureless, noncalcareous (not sampled) 13 9 9
Multicolored but predominantly brown (10YR
5/3) sand (loamy sand), noncalcareous 12 10 11
Very pale brown (10YR 7/3) clayey silt (silt
loam), strong brown (7.5YR5/6) stain
along joint faces, noncalcareous 9 11 8
Pale brown (10YR 6/3) pebbly silty sand
(gravelly sandy loam), pebbles are scat-
tered in sand matrix, noncalcareous 11 12 7
Multicolored but predominantly dark yellowish
brown (10YR 4/4) poorly sorted deposit, pre-
dominantly gravel and sand with some clay
and a small amount of silt; a few large lime-
stone or dolomite "ghost" pebbles, but ma-
trix is noncalcareous 1 7 14 2
Reddish yellow (7.5YR 6/6) sand (loamy sand),
contains a few silt layers, noncalcareous... 2 6 16 8
Silt, noncalcareous (not sampled) 2 16 10
Strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) sandy gravel, non-
calcareous 3 17 1
Yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) sandy gravel (same
bed as unit above, but calcareous) 19 18 10
Laminated silt and sand, calcareous (not
sampled) 2 19
Multicolored sandy gravel, calcareous 4 3 23 3
Pebbly silty sand, calcareous (not sampled).... 5 23 8
Multicolored pebbly sand (gravelly sand),
faintly oxidized, calcareous 1 6 25 2
Covered below.
HEAVY MINERAL RATIOS OF WEATHERING PROFILES
17
en
•z.
o
1— 1
B
uu
CO
^— ^
+->
ll.
x:
o
en
•H
•P-.
Q)
o
=S
\-\
H
>-
h-t
X)
co
( )
+->
u.
c
s
d>
n
O
U
M
CD
•-)
Q.
<
u
C
h- 1
•H
2
2
U)
0)
U
u
PJ
3
>
CT>
• H
1
<-W
.
f— 1
<
i— (
<
a
^^
m
<
H.
(unu 300 *>)
Abjd ib^oi
(mm qooO*>)
Aejo auij
Ajsa o} auij
[unu Q000*)
Aeio mnipaw
(mm I00*)
Aejo asjeoo
(mm Z00'<290'>)
His xeioi
(mm 200*)
}"[I S auij AjaA
[uu" ?00"<0T0'>)
^Xis auT£ z
CO
If)
O CM O
CN —I TO
CD nO
nO ■— I
o
00
o
o
O nO
CO
o
CM
CO
CM
co
co
co
CO
CO
co
CO
on
CO
CM
CM
00
•—I
in
CM
CO
CM
co
CM
i— !
CO
o
o
CM
if)
o
in
nO
nO
o
co
CM
in
CM
CM
oo
no
CM
CO
o
CO
oo
oo
CO
CO
o
.— 1
nO
CM
CM
CM
CO
CM
CO
in
CM
in
CM
CO
•—I
o
CO
co
CO
^
OJ
nO
in
vO
CM
o
in
nO
CO
00
in
nO
oo
O
co
o
o
o
nO
o
CM
CN
CO
^r
if)
nO
M-
CO
co
CO
in
*t
CO
in
^r
CO
O
CO
CN
CO
o
oo
o
oo
00
o
CM
CM
CO
nO
o
oo
CM
co
r— 1
CO
if)
in
If)
CO
CO
CO
-*
r-
in
in
nO
nO
in
<*
CO
CM
o
in
If)
if)
co
CO
r-
i— i
in
in
in
oo
CM
CO
CO
co
CO
■—1
O
r-
o
co
if)
CM
If)
oo
<*
in
CM
in
nO
in
in
r-
in
in
in
co
in
o
in
co
n— <
o
CO
CO
r— 1
o
CM
on
o
CM
00
co
o
co
3
CO
CM
nO
o
o
oo
CM
in
0>
CO
r-
r~-
vO
If)
oo
r-
o
o
o
-
■—i
00
00
CO
CO
CM
co
nO
nO
nO
CM
nO
00
CM
o
CM
i— I
o
00
00
o
oo
CM
MD
in
o
-a-
■—<
o
O
00
r~-
vO
CTi
CO
ON
o
o
i— i
O
o
rH
■—<
1— 1
■—i
■—1
f-H
■— (
f-H
"*
^H
o
o
no
nO
o
co
o
o
co
o
in
nO
nO
CM
CO
O
On
CM
in
CO
o
in
MD
O
;i« mnipaw Q
O
I— i
(mm oeO*<290*:
o
ooinincM oor~cMino oo^noco
CMCMCMCM -h^h^h^hCM CMCM
CO
^o cm
oo o
co
(T>
CO
in
CM
1TJS asjeoQ •-jcocm^'-i^h inooo^Hin cmcocm
(mm 290*<29e'3>)
pues ie^.oi
(mm 390')
pues autj Ajba
(mm Q2T'<0Qc:*>)
pues auij
(mm 0Q2*<00?*>)
pues mriipaw
(mm 00Q*<000*I>)
puss asjeoo
(mm 000'\)
pues asjBoo Aaa/\
(mm 29e # 2<)
T3ABJ9
co in cm in
oo o cm o
co co ^o CM
^h CO CM vO
r~ o
oo co
a^duiBS
o in
in cm
CM vO
TO
o
O
■— 1
CM
^r
o
CM
oo
00
CM
oo
■—I
nO
p— 1
co
f-H
00
^-1
CM
CM
CM
O
•-O
oo
•-<
in
CO
in
CM
CO
i-H
ON
in
00
3
o
ON
in
ON
CM
in
.—i
CM
'J
CM
i-H
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO
CO
CM
NO
r-
in
nO
CM
CM
o
if)
CM
CM
CO
CO
i—i
■n*
in
CO
o
o
— I
o
o
o
o
CM
NO
CO
in
CO
•^r
CO
in
■*
CO
CM
f-{
o
ON
00
r-
nO
in
>*
CO
CM
r— 1
PL,
IX,
lu
a.
Ph
PL,
LL,
LL,
PU
PU
PL,
P-,
PL,
PL,
PU
4)
3
C
•H
-t->
c
o
o
1
^_^
to
2
O
en
n
H
O
s
8
u-.
o
4->
c
§
(1)
o
H
n
0)
Q.
00
2
C
2
C )
u
M
fj
3
<.
u
n
5
i— (
t— )
o
_<
3
CM
CO
co
i— i
CO
CO
CO
oo
■— i
O
00
CM
00
2
o
<3-
00
CM
•— 1
o
oo
o
00
oo
o
CO
CM
co
CM
1—1
CM
CM
CM
oo
CM
IT)
CM
00
CM
r-
CM
oo
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO
in
iD
■>$-
00
r~
O
■St
CO
CM
O
O
r-
CO
00
00
O
<*
o
00
CM
CM
CO
CM
CM
.—t
00
oo
o
00
00
CM
co
•— i
CO
i— 1
00
o
CM
i-H
CM
CM
co
CM
CO
CM
on
1—1
•— 1
•— i
•— 1
<3-
00
oo
o
1—1
18 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
(ujui 200*>)
Aexo \v%oi
(ujui Q000*>)
Aexo 9Uij
AJ9A 0TJ. 9UI£
(ujui g000'<100*>)
Aexo tunipew
(ujuj T00*<300*>)
Aejo asjeoQ
(ujui 300')
q.XTS xe^-oi
(ujuj 300*)
}XT S au IJ AjaA
(ujui QOO^OTO^)
+IT S 9U Td cMo^t^vovot^ vo^oiDiOvo
CM
CM
00
r-
co
o
00
in
00
CM
O
00
CM
o
i— i
O
CO
vO
i— 1
■*
O
i— 1
o
00
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
00
CM
00
CM
00
CM
O
O
o
o
o
o
CM
OO
CM
CM
in
O
i-H
co
CM
o
<*
00
CM
CM
CM
iT)
00
on
3
CO
00
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
00
00
00
00
00
00
CO
■— i
vO
00
in
00
O
lX0
co
CM
CM
CO
oo
00
in
00
CM
00
CM
CM
O
00
00
o
in
CM
xf
ID
in
t>
r-
vO
^P
in
oo
iO
i—i
ON
vO
•3-
vO
r-
oo
vf)
co
r~
iO
vO
in
<¥
■*
t
t
<*
oo
co
oo
00
00
"*
t
■tf
T
■3-
CO
CM
00
CM
oo
CM
co
CM
in
vO
o
00
lT)
oo
o
o
O
•—I
co
o
CM
t-
vO
00
o
r-
vO
t
^
■*
^r
•*
00
00
00
iT)
vO
^O
vO
vO
r-
vO
CM
00
^o
1— I
o
CM
ON
o
CO
o
in
00
o
oo
CO
vO
co
co
CO
(ujuj oTo*)
(ujuj oeO') §
1-XTS asjeoo S
T^
( )
l— i
■*
it
vO
vO
CM
CM
O
"*
00
00
<*
vO
OM
o
00
C3
o
UJ
o
i-H
o
o
O
O
«*
o
r>
lT)
•
vO
r~
O
CM
oo
i— I
CM
O
oo
in
t
00
00
vO
r~
vO
00
oo
a;
00
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
(ujuj 390*<29C*3>)
pues \v\ol
(ujui 390*)
pues 9UTJ AJ9A
(UJUI CZ\')
pues auxj
(ujui 0?2*<00Q # >)
pues uiriipaw
(ujui OOQ'<000'T>)
pues asjeoo
(ujui §w\)
pues asjeoo Ajsa
(ujui 29e*2<)
X3Aejo)
LU
0>
CO
00
o
in
o
oo
^1-
00
CM
o
CM
iD
lT)
CM
CO
ao
oo
CM
co
CM
-St
co
oo
CO
CO
00
1—1
■—1
o
■—I
■—I
o
i-H
i— l
i— i
o
o
oo
M"
CM
r~ 1
CM
Gp
o
o
f— i
oo
CM
i-H
"Sf
00
O0
in
00
oo
co
t>
oo
ON
CM
^O
i-H
in
oo
r-
00
in
CO
axduies
00
1— t
o
00
O
CO
■—I
00
00
CM
00
CM
1—1
00
CM
co
o
00
o
ON
00
00
in
00
00
CO
1—1
00
CM
CO
CM
ID
00
o
"3-
vO
co
■—1
vO
1—1
in
00
iT)
1—1
CM
o
i-H
vO
00
in
r-
co
o
00
vO
lD
iT)
iD
iD
vO
r~
r~
r-
o
00
Ov
r~
r~
r-
in
o
vO
00
00
1—1
00
00
■—I
^O
ON
co
o
o
o
•—I
vO
in
00
vO
co
■-o
o
t-
o
i-H
o
1— t
o
o
ON
o
■—I
CM
CO
iD
CM
co
•—t
o
o
3
o
00
oo
n
00
oo
MO
oo
•—I
oo
-o
o
ON
o
r-
00
CM
vO
if)
lT)
o
CM
CM
O
lT)
CM
o
lT)
i-H
vO
o>
o
1—1
o
o
o
o
-3-
00
.—I
1—1
oo
■—1
■—I
r~
r~
r-
•—I
^o
CM
o
00
o
vO
oo
o
o
in
•—I
O
oo
lT)
00
o
■■o
o
co
i-H
CO
ON
o
1—1
CM
CM
oo
CM
00
CM
CM
^t
■vt
CM
M-
<—i
■*
CM
CM
1— 1
in
00
n
oo
oo
oo
ON
i-H
vO
1—1
00
i>
»— i
■—I
oo
vO
iT)
c>
c>
i—4
iD
o
o
i—4
o
o
o
o
1—1
i-H
■—I
CM
•—I
CM
1—1
00
00
CO
vO
00
oo
lT)
if)
c>
CM
o
•-<
00
00
00
CM
ON
St
00
ON
r-4
o
i— 1
•—I
o
o
o
•—{
CM
1—1
o
^t
CM
CM
00
CM
^J"
f-
>o
iT)
<*
CO
CM
1—1
o
C>
00
r-
vO
in
M"
00
CM
<—i
UJ
ai
UJ
UJ
IXI
UJ
UJ
w
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
T3
0)
3
C
-P
c
HEAVY MINERAL RATIOS OF WEATHERING PROFILES 19
. ^. OOOOM-OOcMCMOvOOCOOO^nCM
(uiui 300^) ^hoooooo o in t- ^r o in o cm
abxo T e ^°I (N h in in o d d cm d d ^' oo n
cm co co oo o •— i •— i t-H i-h
(uiui 5000* > ) cm cm o o o oo -t cm vo oo h in in
v ™ uu / in co co o o m- o o in .-h o ^h o
AeTO 3Uii
/_«. „., ,„' >n oo vo o oo o in o oo o cn-h^h
AJ9A 0} 3UT£ h Ol Ol (N CM •-< -H ^ —I
(uiui <5000*<100*>) cm cm cm cm m- in m- oo r- o o o vo
fr,™ ,„r^~=,., O CM -H CM O CM O 00 O 00 00 CO vO
Aeto uinipaw
co t in oo co o—iooo ooo
(uiui T00*<300">) t ^ oi ^o oo -tfcNvovoo oo r- -i
v wu w~< / voo-^voo cm in co o m r~ o vo
Abto ssjeoo .....
00 00 00 CO OOJi-nOO ooo
oovOc\|\QO ror-ni^-in^ o in r-
(uiui 200*<390*>) oi r- ^ J5 ^f in r- ^h o o cm -n ^r
}"[ TS ie T oj: oO'tcM^H oo cm o in oo o in in
r- vo in in vo vo oo
fuiui Z00*00*>) o^Ovocnvo in vo o oo cm n in ^
* wu ,U Y ' o cm oo co r- in o o in oo , . vOOcM'tOOcMO^^HvOCMCM
w x: (uiui 500*<0T0*>) r- t- ^ oo ^o in-nooin m-^hoo
o "- 1 T TT S 3UI d r-i cm o o o ooot^io ^^ho
$ xi (uiui 0T0"<0£0">) z o oo r- o r- oo ^ o o oo o r- \r
1TTS UITlTpaWi-H d OT 't CM O -^ ^ CM -H -n d -h cm
xii ^"h CO CM CM CM 00 00-1
u
W
, oo o oo cm cm ^o in r- oo •** oo voinr-
(mui 0C0*<390" > ) in ■* r- o cm h h m ^t co ^ co -i
}tts asjBOQ a d d cm -h cm r^t^d^d m d h
U4-— I^H-— lr-H.-H .-I .—I
UJ
,pq- oo o
(uiui 390*<39£*3>) inoin-a-in in r- o oo r- co o ,-h
pues TEioi r- r- o ^ r- in t^ .-i oo vo o cm o
—I OO^H^rcOOO^CMt-
(uiui ?:90*) >n ^t oo h rt oo oo o in oo cm vo in
pueS 8UTI Aja/\ .
-J CM CM ") cooinoi^ co o >* o cm co *o o
pues 9Ufj oi oi pi "f h cm vo in co r- ) t^^-i^ir-oj ini-^nM-^ votoo
ai
9 pues umxpaw ^^h^h^h^ ^-cni^^o roooin
in .-i ■— I vD t-H CM
CMOinCOCM ^-lOCOvOvO vClrHO
(uiui 00Q*<000*I>) ooinininoo fin^ojoo or~^
pues asjeon odooo indogovo cmcooo
) tr-co-ir- o pi eo co * ^hvo^i
pues asjeoo Aa9A ddddo cMOcoodd r-^dr^
^H f-H r-l
in oo i-i oo
(uiui 29C*3<) t °i ^ "i "*,
XSAbjo d d d d
t CO CM rH o
. i— t •— i ■— i w— i i— i
ajduies " ' ' • •
a 00 03 0Q 03 00.
t-
n
in
t-
■-I
^H
^t
CM
co
CM
O
CN
1
•
•
•
in
in
O
in
oo
CM
^H
•tf
M-
vO
•-t
o
00
r-
vO
in
■tf
CO
■-t
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
CQ
20
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
3
C
■H
+->
c
o
u
1
„ s
-P
CO
x:
2
m
C )
•rH
p— 1
Q>
H
=S
! >
UJ
>
53
X!
Ph
-P
o
C
0)
2
o
o
tH
KH
(1)
H
o.
i-i
CO
c
( )
•H
u,
>
m
( >
(i>
u
u
n
►J
en
<
•H
u
<+H
H- 1
z
I-H
3!
I-H
u
LU
^
UJ
PQ
<
(ujui 200 '>)
Ae-[o ieq.01
(ujui Q000*>)
Aejo suij;
Aj8a 0} aui£
(uw Q000*<100'>)
Aejo uinipsw
(uiuj I00'<200'>)
(ujuj 200*<290*>)
j,Its -[£3,01
(mm 300*)
}"[T S 9UIJ AJ9A
(uiuj <500*<0T0*>)
q,Xis auxj
(muj oio*)
(ujuj oeO"<290*>)
J,fTS SSJBO0
;™ 390'<39e*2>)
pues ieo,oi
(uiuj 290*)
pues puij Ajsa
(ujui ?2T<0Q2'>)
pues auij
(ujuj 0QZ*<00Q'>)
pues uintpaw
[uiuj 00Q*<000*T>)
pues asjeoo
;ujuj ooo*i)
pues ssjeoo Aj8A
[UJUJ 29e*3<)
X9ABJ0
aiduies
CM
■3-
o
M0
•J
CM
00
o
CM
o
M0
M0
CO
CO
in
in
r-
o
in
o
00
i-H
CO
CM
M0
CO
iD
CO
I— i
CM
CO
CO
CO
CM
CO
o
CO
ON
■-H
ON
ON
00
CO
00
M0
p-
M0
cM
CM
00
O
in
o
o
CO
M0
M0
CO
CM
oo
r-H
M0
CM
CO
CO
co
CO
CM
CM
CO
CM
ON
f-i
CM
i-H
M0
M0
^r
o
p»
o
M0
CM
CO
00
.— 1
CM
O
o
•—<
M0
CM
r-i
■-H
M0
CO
o
03
CM
CO
CO
CM
CO
CM
i-H
CM
*t
■*
CO
i-H
•—<
i— i
CN
00
M0
CM
M0
M0
CM
CO
i-H
in
CO
ON
CM
in
in
O
CN
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CM
CM
t
M0
CO
r—\
>-H
CM
O
-JO
mo
P-
CO
^3-
O
i-H
CM
•— 1
CO
CO
O
in
CM
co
M0
M0
r-
CN
p-
MO
M3
p-
CO
CO
00
CO
CO
CM
r-
CM
i-H
CM
00
CM
i-H
ON
o
i-H
03
■tf
o
CM
co
CO
o
in
CM
in
CO
O
■-H
CM
O
CO
o
o
r-
CO
CM
M0
t>
mo
o
vD
^o
in
vO
M0
M0
ON
"*
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
P-
CM
o
in
o
00
00
o
r-
co
M0
in
co
r-
in
CM
M0
o
oo
CO
o
If)
o
I-H
o
r-H
co
r~
o
r-
^r
o
CO
in
CM
r— 1
- 1
^'■
2
o
CM
r-
mo
CM
oo
CO
O
o
o
i-H
O
•-H
M0
CO
CO
CO
in
CO
M0
ON
CO
M0
H
O
UJ
to
§
u
o
<^
CM
CM
r-H
CO
M0
00
CM
OS
00
oo
i-H
o
CO
t-H
CO
in
CM
»-H
r-H
in
in
o
CM
CO
ON
CM
o
o
CM
On
CO
in
--H
&
o
r-H
CM
i— i
oo
t-
oo
CO
^O
•*
in
■^r
CM
CM
CO
CM
>
H
M3
00
o
o
CO
CO
00
CM
in
M0
t— 1
in
CM
O
CO
ON
CO
r-
in
00
CO
(7*
R
00
CO
r— 1
uD
"Sf
in
i-H
CO
CM
■-H
>*
CM
co
co
ON
■a-
ON
ON
CO
ro
CO
r-H
oo
CM
o
CM
o
CO
i-H
CM
"St
M0
ON
ON
o
in
M0
M0
in
O
ON
CM
CO
■*
■St
CO
in
^t
CO
CM
CM
•—<
CM
oo
o
00
CM
O
CM
C3N
00
o
CM
CO
in
o
(N
in
o
ON
in
M0
CM
"«r
lO
-5f
&4 <39 >?3
Loess
F-14 Mixed 84 36 21 159 .53 .36 .68
F-13 Tr j"ii 84 39 17 160 « 53 « 35 - 67
F-12 II 75 45 22 158 .47 .42 .89
F-ll II 93 30 19 158 .59 .31 .53
F-10 II 103 46 17 134 .77 .47 .61
F-9 ii-ili 80 20 8 192 * 42 ,15 * 35
F-8 III 74 15 13 198 .37 .14 .38
F-7 III 71 25 8 196 .36 .17 .46
F-6 IV 53 14 9 224 .24 .10 .43
F-5 IV 45 17 18 203 .22 .17 .78
F-4 IV 51 17 15 217 .24 .15 .63
F-3 V 56 13 13 218 .26 .12 .46
F-2 V 43 25 12 220 .20 .17 .86
F-l V 50 23 9 218 .23 .15 .64
E-17
EFFINGHAM SECTION
Peorian
" Loess
E-16 Silt
143
16
13
104
1.38
.28
.20
174
30
7
89
1.96
.42
.21
197
22
6
75
2.63
.37
.14
202
19
8
71
2.85
.38
.13
192
24
6
78
2.46
.38
.16
186
29
5
80
2.33
.43
.18
137
20
16
127
1.08
.28
.26
169
22
9
100
1.69
.31
.18
179
23
6
92
1.95
.32
.16
185
15
8
92
2.01
.25
.12
169
16
3
112
1.51
.17
.11
130
14
3
153
.85
.11
.13
113
17
3
167
.68
.12
.18
121
10
3
166
.73
.08
.11
121
23
2
154
.79
.16
.21
103
12
3
182
.57
.08
.15
102
13
4
181
.56
.09
.17
E-15 I
E-14 I
E-13 I
E-12 II
E-ll II
E-10 II
E-9 II
E-8 II
E-7 II
E-6 III
E-5 IV
E-4 IV
E-3 V
E-2 V
E-l V
*Number of grains in 300 grains of garnet (Ga), zircon (Zi),
tourmaline (To), and hornblende (Hb).
22 ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
TABLE
B. - HEAVY MINERAL
DATA -
(Cont
inued)
111
inoian
Oulwa
sh Sections
Sample
Unit or
*
No.
No.
No.
No.
Ga
Zi+To
Zi+To
zoce
Ga
Zi
To
Hb
Hb
Hb
Ga
BREEDS SECTION
B-14
Peorian
Loess
59
39
44
158
.37
.53
1.41
B-13
Mixed
73
53
42
130
.58
.73
1.27
B-12
II
61
52
71
116
.53
1.06
2.02
B-ll
II
63
46
54
137
.46
.73
1.59
B-10
Trans.
II-IIl
52
27
34
187
.28
.33
1.17
B-9
III
8
18
4
270
.03
.08
2.75
B-8
III
54
21
16
209
.26
.18
.69
B-7
III
59
17
10
214
.28
.13
.46
B-6
III
27
13
6
254
.11
.07
.70
B-5
III
65
21
9
205
.32
.15
.46
B-4
IV
38
11
10
241
.16
.09
.55
B-3
IV
46
16
9
229
.20
.It
.54
B-l
IV
64
19
10
207
.31
.14
.45
COUNTRY
CLUB
SECTION
C-16
Farmdale
Loess
70
46
51
133
.53
.73
1.39
C-15
Mixed
68
61
60
111
.61
1.09
1.75
C-14
Trans.
I-II
71
77
60
92
.77
1.49
1.93
C-13
II
82
59
64
95
.86
1.29
1.50
C-12
II
77
78
60
85
.91
1.62
1.79
C-ll
II
82
63
53
102
.80
1.14
1.41
C-10
II
67
48
55
132
.51
.78
1.54
C-9
Trans.
II-III
78
29
32
161
.48
.38
.78
C-8
III
45
15
19
221
.20
.15
.76
C-7
III
36
14
11
239
.15
.10
.69
C-5
III
38
16
9
237
.16
.11
.66
C-4
IV
76
14
13
197
.39
.14
.36
C-3
IV
79
31
9
181
.44
.22
.51
C-2
IV
43
14
7
236
.18
.09
.49
* Number of grains in 300 grains of garnet (Ga), zircon (Zi).
tourmaline (To), and hornblende (Hb).
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 273
22 p., 12 figs., 2 tables, 1959
CIRCULAR 273
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
URBAN A '^"ftl^ " 4