THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY 250 Sh8w every 2. Unly one book can be taken at a time for the use of one person. Two books may be taken for the use of a family. Two volumes of one work may be con- sidered as one book. 3. A duodecimo may be retained one week ; a larger book two weeks ; but not longer without renewal. Ten cents per week Vv^ill be charged for each violation of this rule. A book lost must be replaced by the loser. 4. The Library will be open every Sunday afternoon, for a half hour after service, when the time of service is 3 o’clock ; for a half hour before service, when the time of service is 4 o’clock. 5. Books offered as donations to be approved of by the Rector before they can be added to the Library. LIBHAHI OF < 34^0 y 3 3 o 1. The Parish Library is offered to the free use of every member of the congregation. 2. Only one book can be taken at a time for the use of one person. Two books may be taken for the use of a family. Two volumes of one work may be con- sidered as one book. 3. A duodecimo may be retained one week ; a larger book two weeks ; but not longer without renewal. Ten cents per week will be charged for each violation of this rule. A book lost must be replaced by the loser. 4. The Library will be open every Sunday afternoon, for a half hour after service, when the time of service is 3 o’clock ; for a half hour before service, when the time of service is 4 o’clock. 5. Books offered as donations to be approved of by /93 m WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? BY THOMAS VOWLER SHORT, BISHOP OF SOBOR AND MAN^ NEW- YORK: STANFORD & SWORDS, 139 BROADWAY. PHILADELPHIA : GEO. S. APPLETON, 146 CHESNUT ST. 230 p vOw AND FORMER PARISHIONERS. Our heavenly Father never bestows a greater blessing on his unworthy servants, than when he enables us to become the instruments of his goodness to our fellow creatures. It was with this'prospect that the holy apostles rejoiced in being counted worthy to suffer in the cause of Christ; but the same gracious Power, which has allowed me to hope that my exertions IV DEDICATION. among you have not been wholly unproductive of good, has crowned his mercy with an earthly bles- sing, and instead of being exposed to sufferings, I have met with nothing but kindness, on the part of those who were the objects of my care. When the pastoral connexion between us was about to cease, I received so many proofs of affec- tion from all classes in Bloomsbury, that it will be impossible that I should ever forget them : and I trust that the method which I have now taken to express my sense of your kindness, may not only record my sentiments, but itself prove useful to the cause of our Master. My immediate object in printing these pages, is to send them as a keepsake to those, from wKose% hands I have received kindness — not by way of a return, but to show them how much I esteem their gifts, and desire that the memorial of them may never perish. That which I endeavoured to lay before you in my sermons, is here dressed in a lighter garb ; and if in this shape it shall attract the notice, or fix the judgment of any of those into whose hands it shall fall, the favour will be due to the good- ness of God. DEDICATION Indistinctness on religious subjects is a great evil, particularly to the young; but theological clearness does not always lead to Christain edifi- cation and practical holiness. It was my endea- vour, while I preached among you, to combine distinct views on the leading tenets of Christianity with that earnestness, without which religion is apt to dwindle into a mere name. I tried to place before my hearers, not words only, but ideas — to give them that which they might carry home, in order to guide them in the path to heaven — to press on them the fundamentals of our holy faith — and to point out how this faith should show forth its effects in the daily occurrences of life. May the Almighty bestow a blessing on this little volume. May it prove useful to those for whom it was composed, and to him who wrote it : and if hereafter it shall afford instruction or edifica- tion to any who knew not Bloomsbury, may they learn to thank God for that love which existed between the Rector and inhabitants of a large metropolitan parish, and try to foster and support the parochial system, which has proved a blessing, spiritual and temporal, to many who needed com- fort ; and which affords the best human organiza- 1 * VI DEDICATION. tion for diffusing and maintaining that faith on which all our hopes are built. That God may in everyway bless the parish of St. George. That the exertions of my successor maybe crowned with increasing usefulness. That the neighbouring parishes may advance in every good word and work, and by their co-operation and example help forward the cause of our holy religion in that district where I laboured, shall be the constant and humble prayer of one, who was once your Rector, and will always be your friend. THOMAS VOWLER SODOR AND MAN. JaUy Isty 1843. Bishop’s Court, I. M, VINCENT L. DILL, STEREOTYPER, This work was originally printed for private cir- culation, but as many friends have wished for more copies than they were willing to receive gratuitously, it has been published. May God’s blessing be on it, and its readers. Bishop’s Court, I. M. iVby. ISth, 1843. CONTENTS. CHAP. PAGE 1. Religion 9 n. Peculiarities of Christianity 21 III. The Atonement 33 IV. Sanctification 45 V. The Freeness of the Atonement 59 VI. The Freeness of Sanctification 70 Vn. Sanctification the fruit of Justification 78 Vni. Mere Knowledge not Religion 88 IX. The Christian looking back 99 X. The Christian looking forward 121 XL The Christian exerting HIMSELF 145 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? Oh, where shall rest be found, Rest for the weary soul ? ’Twere vain the ocean-depths to sound, Or pierce to either pole : The world can never give The bliss for which we sigh ; ’Tis not the whole of life to live, Nor all of death to die. Beyond this vale of tears. There is a life above, Unmeasured by the flight of years ; And all that life is love : — There is a death, whose pang Outlasts the fleeting breath ; Oh ! what eternal horrors hang Around the “ second death !” Lord God of truth and grace, Teach us that death to shun, Lest we be banished from Thy face. And evermore undone : Here would we end our quest ; Alone are found in Thee The life of perfect love — the rest Of immortality. WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? CHAPTER I. In a circle of friends who were talking on the general state of society, particularly with reference to the ignorance on religious subjects which is prevalent in England, it was observed by an individual, whose opinion was well worthy of attention, That the great mass of those among whom we live, do not know what Christianity is.” The position was not much con- troverted at first, for each of the hearers made such modifications as to the sense in which the observation was to be received, that he brought it down within the limits of his own ideas, and would have allowed, that with reference to certain classes of society, and con- sidering the numbers of which they consist, the asser- tion might be correct ; or if by the term Christianity, a degree of strictness of conduct and firmness of faith were implied, such as was probably intended by the speaker, they would have agreed that the position could admit of little or no doubt. So that when due allowance was made for the want of religious education among the lower and middle orders, and for the full import conveyed by the term Christianity, almost all the party would have admitted, ‘‘ That the majority of a Christian community do not know what Christianity is.” But much more than this, was intended by the individual who made the observation. For in this extended sense, the majority of the world among 12 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? whom we live have no religion at all. They are not influenced, in what they do, by any fixed principles which refer to a future responsibility. Practically they do not believe in the undoubted truth, that we shall all hereafter be judged according as we have con- ducted ourselves in this life. Their minds may be so far convinced, that they may not be prepared to con- trovert the position ; but if we look at their conduct with reference to a day of judgment, as a question of fact, it would be very difficult to prove that they did believe in a future state. The observation, however, here made did not refer to practice, but to knowledge. It was not that the majority of the world did not live as Christians, for this would need no proof to him who knows what Christianity is ; but that they did not know what Christianity is. The person who made the observation, did not mean to confine it to the classes with whom he was not conversant, for he was not well acquainted with the dense mass of ignorance and irreligion which prevails in this Christian and enlightened country ; but he meant, that among those who, like himself, had received a good education, in the usual acceptation of the term,, the majority had been so neglected in the instruction which was given them, on this most important subject, that they were never taught what Christianity is ; and that from inattention, from a want of anxiety about their eternal safety, they had gone on, contented with those vague and uncertain notions, which they had imbibed by an intercourse with others, who were frequently much in the same state as themselves. A young man who left RELIGION. 13 the head of a public school, without having any notion of the rules by which Greek and Latin verses are regulated, would be esteemed very ignorant ; but if he did not know the difference between the motives which influenced a sincere heathen, or which influ- enced St. Paul, few persons would complain that his education was imperfect. Maria was, at sixteen, possessed of most of the accomplishments which are acquired from masters. Her father had been pleased with the progress which she had made in the acquisition of music, of drawing, and of the modern languages, and he had himself delighted to lead her beyond that mechanical know- ledge of history, which her governess gave with much judgment and regularity, into the first principles of politics and political economy. She was thus prepared to give a sound opinion on the different forms of government which exist in the world, and of the advantages possessed by each. She was in fact much better educated than most young women of her age are. She had been accustomed to attend with regu- larity on the public service of the Church, but her parents were not religious ; she never heard of religion except in the service of the Church, which, in reality, she did not understand ; she had never been taught anything about it, and she had never thought on the subject. If you had asked her what Christianity is, she would have told you, perhaps, that it was the religion of Christians, and that with no more real knowledge of the subject, than if she had said, that Hindooism is the religion of the Hindoos. 2 14 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? If the reader will here pause, for one moment, and look into his own case, and see how much he himself is able to answer this question, he will perhaps more fully understand the real state of this young person’s knowledge. Pause for a few minutes. Write down for yourself what Christianity is, and keep the defini- tion, which you yourself would give of it, till you have read through these few pages ; and then see how far your own knowledge of Christianity exceeds that which is here described. This answer of Maria seems, at first sight, so vague and uncertain, that it might be useless to say more concerning it, excepting that if the position before laid down be true, the state of many of the readers of this book, may not be far distant from her’s ; and if real instruction is to be given, it must always com- mence at the point where present knowledge ends. We must not assume any greater degree of knowledge than is actually possessed. We must be content to lay the foundations, if we would provide for the security of the superstructure. Christianity, then, is ‘‘ the religion of Christians.” It is generally, a religion and it is specially, the religion of Christians.” First, then, let us see whether we understand what is meant by the term a religion.” If a traveller were to discover, in the interior of Africa, a civilized people, who were conversant with many of the common in- ventions which are in use among ourselves, who were governed by equitable laws, and possessed habits and cus- toms which corresponded with those of the inhabitants RELIGION. 15 of Europe, but if he could at the same time discover no outward forms or ceremonies of religion among them, he would hardly conclude that they were without religion. He would say in his own mind there must be some principles from which all these good fruits arise ; and he would, as occasion allowed him, endea- vour to discover the opinions of the more enlightened individuals with whom he conversed, as to a future state. There would, in his own ideas, exist a close connexion between their belief in a future state, and their religion. Their notions of responsibility would depend on their conviction, that they should be here- after called to an account for the things done in this life ; and the nature of the responsibility, — the prac- tical effect which it had in governing their minds, would depend on the nature of the tribunal before which they expected to be brought. If they were not assured, that they should be tried at all hereafter, they would be careless altogether ; if they entertained very loose notions of the purity or of the moral rectitude of their future judge, they would be more disposed to propitiate him as a tyrant, to whose dominion they would hereafter be subjected, than as a judge who would pass a righteous sentence on them, according to the deeds done in the body. The first thing then which this traveller would endeavour to ascertain, would be, the belief of the people of this newly discovered country ; but he would never be satisfied that this belief was real, unless he saw that it did practically influence the conduct of those who pro- fessed it. The mariner who believes that the rapid 16 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? sinking of the barometer indicates the approach of a violent storm, prepares himself and his vessel against the tempest, which the altered height of the mercury induces him to expect. If he were to make no pre- paration, it would be difficult to persuade the passengers, whose safety depended on his skill in the management of the ship, that he really believed this index of a coming gale. They would argue that he could not really believe it, while this belief induced him to take no measures of precaution. So if the traveller in Africa had learnt the opinions of this people as to a future state, and found that their conduct seemed to correspond with such a belief as he had been told that they professed, he would probably make no further enquiries as to their religion. He would say on his return, that they had no outvv^ard forms of worship, but that their religion was such, as it had been described to him. If, then, it were again asked, “ What is religion we should probably answer. It is such a belief in a judgment to be passed on us in a future state, as will induce us to propitiate the power which is to judge us. The belief is the religion, and the reality of the belief is proved by the effect which it produces on our actions in this life. We can have no doubt that Abraham believed the promises of God, for he gave up his home and kindred, and went into the land of Canaan. He believed in God, even against the daily testimony of his own senses ; for he was ready to slay Isaac, through whom he believed also that not only his family, but that all nations of the earth should be blessed. When RELIGION. 17 an Englishman, in conversing with a Hindoo devotee, who was lying on a bed of spikes, seemed to doubt the reality of his faith, and to question the sincerity of his devotion ; the poor man merely pointed to the spikes, and smiled at the incredulity of one, whose eyes could witness so clear an evidence that there was no decep- tion. The spectator might well have pitied the absur- dity of such a belief, the folly of such a religion ; but he had no ground for questioning its reality. It is indeed possible that the individual so brought before his eyes, might have been an impostor, but there can be no doubt that some among the Hindoos, believe that such self-inflictions are acceptable to their gods. Looking then at religion in this sense, may we con- clude that the majority among ourselves are without a knowledge of religion.^ Certainly not. It would be difiicult to find any one who was not influenced by some sense of religion. Every one has some religion of his own — sometimes it may be Christianity, more frequently a modification of Christianity, and sometimes the religious opinions prevalent among us are very ab- surd; but almost every one has some sense of religion. If it be asked whether they act up to it, it might be safely stated that no one acts up to his sense of religion. Some of us are more glaringly inconsistent than others, but every one has an idea of a right and wrong, with reference to a future state, and every one acts below that notion, — below that standard. Every one who will honestly look into his own heart is self-condemned. There are fifty different standards of morality by which mankind regulate their own conduct, and by which they 2 ^ 18 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? estimate that of their neighbours. We may be told that a soldier ought to fight a duel, though it would be infamous in a clergyman to think of it. That a lawyer may do so or not, according to his sense of religion ; and that, if he has courage enough to refuse a chal- lenge, he must have courage enough also to be contented when he is called a coward. Aspasio one day requested an acquaintance, with whom he was sometimes in the habit of pla3dng for high stakes, to pay him fiftj" pounds, which had been for some time due, as a debt of honour. I beg 3'our pardon, said the friend, for not having dis- charged the debt sooner ; but I do assure you that I have not the most remote idea that I owe you any thing : in order to prevent any unpleasant discussion, the question was referred to a third party, and the statement of Aspasio was as follows. On the day in question we were both invited to dine with a common friend, and as I knew that there would be much conviviality as well as high play in the evening, I declined dining, because after drinking much wine, I can never trust myself at cards ; when I came in during the evening, I found the party engaged in play, and the sum in question was a private bet between us, on the odd trick. I cannot be mistaken, for I had purposely kept myself sober, and the others had been drinking a great deal of wine. I am sure they had, from the state in which I found them, and from what I know to be the habit of the house. Upon this statement, the umpire decided the bet in favour of Aspasio, and Aspasio, after having accepted the money, was still received in society. Had he attempted to place a card as he shuffled it, he would have been esteemed as little better than a thief. Yet RELIGION. 19 most right-minded men would rather have their friend rob on the highway, than do what Aspasio did. This is the standard of a gambler ; and yet there are few men who have played highl}", who would be prepared to lay open all the secrets of their gambling transactions, even to one who would judge them on these principles. However low a man’s standard is, still he sometimes acts below his own low standard ; but there is always some lower depth of guilt, from which he turns away in abhorrence, or on which he feels sure that divine vengeance will hereafter fall. However degraded his own ideas of morality may be, still there is some clear reference to God — there is something which God must and will punish. Such persons have an idea of religion, however vague and uncertain ; and generally the idea which they entertain is in some measure correct. Whatever their personal conduct may be, they have a sufficiently clear knowledge of what is right and wrong in the conduct of others. If Aspasio had possessed a large estate in Ireland, he might have neglected every duty which the possession of such a trust entailed on him, and never have resided on it, or endeavoured to improve the condition of his tenantry ; but he would have decided very properly, that every clergyman ought to be forced to reside on his living, and do his duty there : he might thence have argued against all plurali- ties, and have expressed his astonishment, that any man could think of taking orders for the sake of worldly profit. All this would prove that Aspasio knew what religion was. In the instance of another, he would be able to see the devotion which ought to flow from the belief that we shall hereafter be called to a strict 20 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? account ; from that devotion he would himself beg to be excused ; but he would see the necessity of it in those who wish to act consistently with their belief in a day of judgment ; he would see around him, perhaps, many false and absurd species of devotion — but he would see, too, that no absurdity in devotion is half so absurd as indifference whether we do or do not please God. If there be a Deity, and if hereafter we are to be judged by that Deity, and if our eternal state is to depend on that judgment ; — then a whole life devoted to the service of that Being, must be the real work of man, — the real employment which ought to absorb every faculty of the creature. Men may doubt whether certain species of devotion will be acceptable to God — whether God has commanded such and such things ; but if we are convinced that God has enjoined this or that line of conduct, it is absurd for any man to talk of believing in God, when he lives in total opposition to these revealed and acknowledged commands, or neglects that on which his salvation depends. Now every one who can see this, does know what religion is ; he may not know what Christianity is, but the light of nature has taught him, that religion cannot be less than an entire wish to please that God, before whose judgment- seat we shall hereafter answer, for the manner in which we have passed our lives. Lord of all power and might, who art the author and giver of all good things ; graft in our hearts the love of thy Name, increase in us true religion, nourish us with all goodness, and of thy great mercy keep us in the same, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. THE THE PECULIARITIES OF CHRISTMITY. Father of all ! whose wondrous grace Moved Thee to save our guilty race ; Before Thy throne we sinners bend ; To us Thy pard’ning love extend. Almighty Son ! Incarnate Word ! Our Prophet, Priest, Redeemer, Lord, Before Thy throne we sinners bend ; To us Thy saving grace extend. Eternal Spirit ! by whose breath The soul is raised from sin and death ; Before Thy throne we sinners bend ; To us Th}’^ quick’ning power extend. Jehovah ! Father, Spirit, Son, Mysterious Godhead ! Three in One ! Before Thy throne we sinners bend ; Grace, pardon, life, to all extend. THE PECULIARITIES OP CHRISTIANITY. CHAPTER 11. If then we regard this question, at the point at which we have at present arrived, it may be asked whether we have advanced much in the real knowledge of what Christianity is : for according to what has been already stated, it would appear that the Hindoo, who had placed himself on a bed of spikes, was much more influenced by religion, than the great mass of those Christians of whose sincerity we are enabled to form a judgment by observing their usual manner of life. No doubt he exhibits much more devotion than many sincere Christians ; his misfortune is, that his devotion is of so mistaken a character ; he may be sincere, but he has failed to use that light of reason with which God has provided him for his guidance ; yet who can say that he may not rise up in judgment against many among ourselves ? An old lady, who was in the habit of keeping a strict account of her own conduct, acknowledged to a clerg 3 "man of her acquaintance, that she never looked over her diary without finding a long catalogue of such proceedings as she could not but lament. That she never balanced her spiritual accounts, without finding the balance greatly on the debtor side. Ido not wonder at it, said the clergyman ; but when you find it so, what do you do ? Oh, said the lady, I read a certain 24 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? number of sermons. It is obvious, from the answer of this old lady, that reading sermons was to her an operation of the same character as the lying on spikes was to the poor Hindoo. It does not seem likely that she anticipated that any great spiritual good would be produced on her own mind by the contents of what she read ; but she thought it right to read sermons, and knew that the doing so was an act of self-denial to her, and she denied herself, and did it, because in some other point she had given way to her own wishes, and had done wrong. The Hindoo expected to be exalted in a future state, by the sufferings which he had voluntarily imposed on himself in this — the lady in- tended to punish herself by doing that which she disliked ; she hoped to gain a sort of pardon by her self-inflicted severity. The principle which influenced these persons is not very different. It may, however, be questioned, whether we can be sure that what this lady did was unchristian, merely because the same sort of thing might be done by a Hindoo ? and a prudent Christian might be unwilling hastily to give a decided answer, for there are many duties which are common to all religions ; but if the act were unreasonable in a Hindoo, the same sort of act must be unreasonable in a Christian, and, at all events, the proceeding was not such as would characterize it as Christian, and what we are now seeking for is, to ascertain that which distinguishes Christianity. When Theodore, who was a well-educated young man, was asked this question. What is Christianity ? he fearlessly answered, that the difference between PECULIARITIES OF CHRISTIANITY. 25 Christianity and all other religions was, that Christianity taught ^‘the forgiveness of injuries;” and when the individual who asked him seemed dissatisfied with the reply, he maintained that heathen moralists had never directed their followers to forgive injuries. Theodore had taken up this idea from others, who ought to have known better ; but the mistake is a very natural one to a person who had no very definite ideas on such subjects. He did not know that almost every heathen moralist has recommended the forgiveness of injuries ; that there is hardly an}^ writer on such subjects who has not seen how much more noble it is to pardon than to revenge an injury — how great a superiority it implies in those who can thus act towards an offender ; but heathen moralists have never taught men to forgive on Christian principles — How could they ? They have never taught men to forgive because we have been forgiven — to show that mercy to others of which we ourselves have been made partakers. This, of course, is peculiar to Christianity. This flows from the doctrine of the atonement, and can flow from nothing else. No man ever exercised the virtue of forgiving more admirably than Socrates did towards his judges ; but Theodore would see that this fact was so far from proving that Socrates was a Christian, that it did not even prove that Socrates had any knowledge or idea of the leading doctrines of Christianity. He probably felt his own need of pardon, and the weakness of man without some guidance from above ; but to feel the want of some revelation from God, is very far from believing that which God has revealed. We may 3 26 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? admire Socrates, and pray that he may never rise up against us in judgment, and condemn us for not having made better use of that which God has made known to us, and which was hid from him ; but woe unto us, if we cannot from our hearts thank God, for revealing that unto us, which was never made known to Socrates. A Hindoo who was converted to Christianity express- ed himself in something of the following manner. In early life I exercised myself in the superstitions of my own creed, but was never satisfied with that which my teachers directed me to perform. I could not help perceiving that the God of the universe could not be gratified by the absurd species of devotion by which I was directed to endeavour to obtain his favour. My own moral sense told me that I had done evil, and how could that evil be wiped off by irrational, degrading, and cruel rites ? I saw that I was wrong, but I knew not where to fly. I was convinced of my own guilt, but I loathed the expiations to which I was directed to apply in order to obtain relief. The Mahometan to whom I applied told me that God was pure and bene- ficent, and that if I would draw nigh to the God whom he worshipped, I must make myself holy and be bountiful to my poorer fellow creatures. All this was rational — I saw the truth of his positions, but my newly-acquired knowledge gave me no comfort. No doubt holiness would please a holy God — but I was not holy. No doubt acts of kindness and justice per- formed towards men, would please a Diety who must approve of those virtues which shine forth so brightly in Himself — but how was I benefited by this ? I was PECULIARITIES OF CHRISTIANITY. 27 not holy towards my God — I had not conferred any benefits on my fellow men, so that the more pure and just the God of the Mahometans should prove, the less hopes had I of being able to endure his judgment — I saw that there was reason and truth in their religion, but this only tended to alarm my fears, and to cut me off from hopes of safety. But when I listened to a Christian teacher, he told me of Jesus, the son of Mary, who had come down from his Father in Heaven to die for sinners. This was what I needed. The God of the Christian hated the sin, but he spared the sinner, and I fled to Jesus and found peace. This man found that in Christianity which is not in any other religion. Mahometanism is vastly superior to heathenism, for it is partly true, being borrowed from revelation, and it connects moral conduct with religious duty ; but its rules are many of them loose and defec- tive, and there is no offer of reconcilation to the sinner. Many systems of religion enjoin sacrificial expiations ; but man’s reason tells him that the blood of bulls and of goats cannot wash away sin. The Jew obeyed the law of God with regard to sacrifices for sin — ^he trusted in the declared mercy of God ; but till the only Son of God died on the cross, the Jew could not have possessed that ground for confidence with which the Christian looks up to his Redeemer. As the Israelite in the wilderness, when bitten by the serpent, looked up to the brazen serpent as the means of his cure, so the Christian looks to Christ crucified, as the means by which he is reconciled to God. The reading sermons might be a very effectual means of improving 28 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? her who engaged in it ; but when she entered on the task because she found that she was in debt to her God, if we may use the expression, no one can avoid suspecting that the object was a wrong one — it looks precisely as if she esteemed it a means of reconciliation with God. Every species of self-denial is useful in itself. It will render those who practise it more able to govern themselves. It may become a very import- ant instrument by which we may correct evil habits in ourselves. But if we are in debt to God, it cannot wipe off the debt — if we are condemned, it cannot free us from our guilt. There must be something else to do this. It was this that the penitent Hindoo sought for in vain in the Mahometan creed. There is another doctrine, not perhaps so exclusive- ly characteristic of Christianity, as the doctrine of the atonement, but equally important, and often more neglected than Redemption itself. All who have taken even a cursory view of Religion, or who have been enabled to see it exercised in sincerity and truth, must have been led to observe the estimation in which holiness is held, even by those who are not holy them- selves. When Hyder Ali invaded the Carnatic, he gave orders to his officers to permit the venerable Swartz to pass unmolested, and to show him respect and kindness, for, said he, he is ^‘a holy man.” And though many of the rites connected with heathen worship seemed framed for the very destruction of all holiness, ;5^et the more enlightened part of every heathen nation appear to have always esteemed those who were holy, as peculiarly acceptable to the gods. The same PECULIARITIES OF CHRISTIANITY. 29 feature may be discovered among ourselves. The worst among us pay a willing tribute to unpretending holiness. Therefore in a general sense, all religion is more or less connected with the pursuit of holiness. The pursuit of it however is carried on very variously by different classes of persons, and sometimes with no great prospect of obtaining it. It may also be remarked, that the re-establishment of holiness is closely connected with the obtaining of reconciliation and par- don. In many cases it seems to be almost the same thing. The offended father would gladly re-admit his banished child to reconciliation and to forgiveness, if he were convinced that the prodigal were reformed. We identify the reformation of the child with the relenting of the father, but there is no such necessary connexion, and it will frequently confuse our reasoning if we do not endeavour to keep that which is separate in the nature of things, separate also in our arguing about it. The favourite son of a king had been engaged in a rebellion against his father’s throne, and was banished for life, he had repented and was entirely reformed, his loving father wished to receive him back to his arms, but he dared not. The seeds of the rebellion were still latent, and might have broken out, had the original author of the evil been brought before the eyes of those who had once engaged in it ; but if the spirit of rebellion had been subdued and destroyed, the offender, even if unreformed, might have obtained a pardon from the affection of the father. These two cases correspond only partially, for external circum- stances create a difference which must influence the 3 * 30 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? result. And who can pretend to judge of that variety of connecting links, which can be known to God alone, and without a full knowledge of which it would be impossible to form a correct judgment ? Even in this world, we all see that reformation in the guilty will not restore them to the advantages which they have lost. The discarded workman may be entirely reform- ed, but he can hardly expect to recover a good situa- tion, of which his ill conduct has deprived him. According to those general ideas which we derive indirectly from revelation, it would seem that religion must have a tendency to sanctify ; but if we examine facts we shall discover that this is not the case. The religion of Greece and Rome had practically no such tendency, though the philosopher might have seen the necessary connexion between holiness and religion. And the same observation may probably be applied to every form of heathenism. It is not however in the mere seeking for holiness that Christianity differs from every other religion, but in the manner in which sanctification is to be sought. The Hindoo seeks, by voluntary self inflictions, for a holiness of his own, which is compatible with a very degraded state of personal and mental corruption. The European heathen of ancient days, sought the holiness which he admired through habits of self- control. He found indeed the inadequacy of the means to the end, and gave way again and again to his own weakness, and to the wickedness of his heart ; but there was nothing unreasonable in his proceedings. In heathen moral philosophy there was much to assist PECULIARITIES OF CHRISTIANITY. 31 the virtuous, but there was little to influence the mass, and there was nothing to reclaim the vicious ; and each man who employed these means found an under- current of evil passions, which prevented him from being able to shape his course as his bare reason would have directed him to do. Christianity bids us seek that from God which we cannot provide for our- selves. She tells us that God must work in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure.” It is not that she would prevent us from using any of those means which reason or philosophy would dictate to the heathen, but she would forbid us to trust in them. It is not that she would bid us make no exertions of our own, but she would direct us to rest the hope of our success on the aid which Heaven would provide for us. She would tell us that the Almighty who was reconciled to us through the sacrifice of his beloved Son, would work in us such a state of holiness as would fit us for the presence of our God hereafter. These are the two doctrines which distinguish Chris- tianitj’^ from every other religion in the world. And the religion of those who believe that Christ died for us, and that the Holy Ghost sanctifieth those that come unto Christ, is Christianity. It was not that Maria had never learnt that part of the Church Catechism which answers to the question. What dost thou chiefly learn by these articles of thy belief.'^ She would have told you — First, I learn to believe in God the Father who made me and all the world ; secondly, in God the Son who hath redeemed me and all mankind, and thirdly, in God the Holy 32 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? Ghost who sanctifieth me and all the elect people of God — but she had never thought much about the question. It was not that she had never uttered with devotional feelings that supplication to the holy Trinity with which the Litany commences. She had then addressed herself to God the Father, to God the Son, and to God the Holy Ghost, but she had never thought why she had done so ; and if she had been asked what was the peculiar meaning of the threefold entreaty contained in the minor Litany, ^^Lord have mercy upon us,” “ Christ have mercy upon us,” “ Lord have mercy upon us,” she would hardly have known why the Lord have mercy upon us” should be repeated. She would have pitied the misguided Hindoo — she would have smiled at the old lady who read sermons, and perhaps if she had read this chapter she might have blushed at her own ignorance of Christianity. O God, the King of Glory, who hast exalted thine only Son Jesus Christ with great triumph unto thy kingdom in heaven ; we beseech Thee, leave us not comfortless ; but send us to thine Holy Ghost to com- fort us, and exalt us unto the same place whither our Saviour Christ is gone before ; who liveth and reign- eth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one God, world without end. Amen. THE DOCTRINE OF THE ATONEMENT. There is a fountain filled with blood, Drawn from Immanuel’s veins ! And sinners, plunged beneath that flood. Lose all their guilty stains. The dying thief rejoiced to see That fountain in his day ; And there may I, as vile as he. Wash all my sins away. Dear dying Lamb ! Thy precious blood Shall never lose its power. Till all the ransomed Church of God, Be saved, to sin no more. THE DOCTRINE OF THE ATONEMENT. CHAPTER III. Since then we have arrived so far on our way, as to have ascertained the definition of Christianity, and to have learnt that the distinguishing characteristics of it are, a belief in the Atonement and in Sanctification, it shall be the object of this and the following chapter, to explain these two most important doctrines ; and for the present we will confine ourselves to the former, and ask what is the doctrine of the Atonement. What is Justification ^ It is the being accounted righteous in the sight of God — the being reckoned righteous, when we are not righteous. He alone can be esteemed really righteous, who has fully performed every commandment of God : a case which will apply to none of the sons of men. But they who are not righteous, are treated by God as if they were righteous. They are pardoned. Our heavenly Father accepts those who are guilty, and who are aware of their guilt, as if they were not guilty in his eyes. He says unto us, Thy sins are forgiven thee.” Our transgressions are spoken of as ‘‘ blotted out,” as not imputed unto us,” and this for the sake of Him who died for us. It is not the being made righteous, but the being accounted righteous. David, when he had sinned, was forgiven. The prophet said unto him, The Lord hath put away thy sin ;” but the sin, the guilt of having broken God’s 36 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? commandments, remained, and must remain. You and I, dear reader, have done that which must render us offenders in the sight of the Most High. We know not the extent, or the nature, of each other’s sins, but we feel sure that both have sinned. Now if we attempt • to conceal our sin from God, we should act with no more wisdom than Adam displayed, when he endea- voured to hide himself among the trees of the garden. Thou hast sinned. Give glory to God, and confess thy sin. We are guilty. We cannot be made inno- cent ; but the Lord of heaven and earth may deal with us in mercy, as if we were innocent. We are debtors, and we have nothing to pay. Oh may He, of his goodness, freely forgive us all that debt. The debt may be paid by another ; but we owe it, and we have nothing to pay. It may be wise, before we proceed further, to point out the difference between these two doctrines, and to observe that Justification is not the same as Sanctifica- tion. Our being made holy, is doubtless necessary to our being received into heaven — Without holiness no man shall see the Lord.” The being made holy is the consequence of being forgiven — the fruit of it. Justification is what Christ hath done for us. God counts us righteous for Christ’s sake. Sanctification is what God works iu usj by his Holy Spirit. There are two effects of sin ; sin makes us guilty in the sight of God, and when God pardons us, and receives us, as though we were not guilty, we are justi- fied. Sin makes our own hearts unholy and defiled, unfit for the presence of t]ie Lord, and indisposed and THE ATONEMENT. 37 unwilling to do the work of the Lord. It makes us unable to draw nigh unto God, in prayer. It turns away our hearts from God — from religion. God works a change in our hearts. He brings us back to holi- ness, through the influence of the Holy Spirit. He turns our souls from evil to good. This is Sanctifica- tion. And though these two operations of God’s mercy are closely joined together ; though the heart of him who is justified by our Saviour, is at the same time, or gradually and progressively, sanctified by the Holy Ghost, yet it will rather lead to indistinctness than clearness, in our views of Christianity, to con- found the two together, and not to distinguish between that which is the antecedent and that which is the consequence. Justification is the being accounted righteous in the sight of God. David felt himself pardoned, when Nathan said unto him, The Lord hath put away thy sin but many earthly punishments attended the king during the remainder of his life, each of which was destined to make his heart more holy, and to sanctify him. He was originally pardoned by a free act of God’s mercy extended to him. The subsequent inflictions were probably meant to produce his refor- mation : to bring him personally back to that state, from which he had by transgression fallen, to that state of heart — to that temper of mind which had been destroyed by his breaking God’s commandments. A son has been detected in dishonesty towards an in- dulgent father, and his ill conduct has arisen from habits of intemperance, into which he has fallen ; he 38 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? confesses his fault, and the father forgives him at once. He forgives him because he loves him, and tells him that he is forgiven, because he esteems the declaration of his forgiveness to be the best means of reforming him ; but the father must watch the son, to prevent his falling again into those habits which have occasioned the offence, and in order to re-establish and reproduce such a spirit of temperance and honesty, as is necessary to render him trustworthy. Here the forgiveness is separate from the reform. The son, if he were not forgiven, would have much less inducement to desire the favour of his father ; and the father may fear lest an injudicious lenity on his part, should retard the reformation of the son, or obstruct it altogether. As, therefore, an earthly father might doubt the expediency of forgiving the offending son, so it may be asked, whether God does offer pardon to all, through Jesus Christ.^ I will quote one text: If any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous, and he is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.” Are all men, then, justified thereby — are all men justified ^ The great majority of the world, of those who have been admitted into Christ’s family by baptism, are living in such a state, as leaves us in no doubt, that all such persi^ns are not justified ; but still this fact does not prove that the means of justification have not been, and are not still, offered to them all. After a great rebellion, a free pardon is offered to all who will sue for it, under a certain form. Are all the rebels thereby pardoned } They who submit, and sue THE ATONEMENT. 39 for the pardon in the right form, are pardoned. The pardon is free, but not unconditional. It is free, and yet there are many individuals who will be excluded from it, and whose exclusion does by no means take off from the freeness of the pardon. The children of a father, who loves them tenderly, have offended him, and are thereby alienated from him ; he is anxious to be reconciled to them, and ready to forgive. Upon the intercession of a friend, he states most clearly his feel- ings with regard to them : he wishes to forgive them — ^he wishes to reinstate them in their former position ; he is not anxious to prescribe any conditions, but he adds, “ I cannot forgive them unless they are sorry for their conduct, and wish to be pardoned. I am more grieved than they are, for I foresee the bitter conse- quences of their behaviour — I see that it must, if per- sisted in, ruin all their prospects in life ; but they must learn to trust and to obey me, or I cannot do them the good which I earnestly desire to do them.” Who then are the subjects who are pardoned ? Which are the children who are reconciled to their offended father ? They are such as will sue for the pardon. They are such as will return to the father. Our Saviour says, Come unto me, all ye that travail and are heavy laden.” His apostle said, ‘‘ Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved.”* We must therefore come unto Christ, trusting that he can and will deliver us. And if we examine any number of texts of the same description, which call on lost man to accept of Acts xvi. 31. 40 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? pardon and reconciliation through Christ, we shall find that, in every case, it is either expressed or implied, that we are to believe on him. This condition — this idea — is briefly and beautifully expressed by St. Paul, Being justified by faith, we have peace with God, through Jesus Christ our Lord.”* If then the objector again asks, — Who are justified } our answer must be, — They are justified who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. What, merely believe } Yes, merely believe — believe — not merely say they believe I — ^believe with the heart, and not with the lips only. And this answer may be confirmed and illus- * Rom. V. 1. t If it be asked, why nothing is here said of Baptism, it may be observed, that the persons to whom these pages are addressed, are such as have already been admitted into the Church by that sacrament, but who, through sin, or the neglect of those who have been their guides, have fallen from the state of grace, into which they were then admitted, into one of a greater or less degree of spiritual darkness. The use of the sacrament seems also to be really implied in the expression “ not merely say they believe.” Whoever comes to the great Physician of souls, must employ the same prudence as would be expected from any one who sought from his fellow-man the recovery of his body. If the sacraments were appointed by our Saviour, he who believes the words of our Saviour, will follow the prescriptions which he has received. It is worse than vain to talk of a faith which does not show itself in obe- dience. Christ promises to save us from our sins here, as well as from the punishment of them hereafter. The only way in which we can come unto Christ here is, by following those directions which he has given us. If I were asked, whether baptism justifies, I should reply. Could an unbaptized person be really a believer, if he did not seek for baptism ? THE ATONEMENT 41 trated, by examining the details connected with the miracles performed by our blessed Saviour. When the broken-hearted father brought his demoniac son to Jesus, and said, If thou canst do any thing, have compassion on us and help us,”* our Lord’s reply is. If thou canst believe, all things are possible to him that believeth.” The father was aware of the imper- fection of his own belief, but the very answer which he made distinctly marked the reality of it : Lord, I believe, help thou mine unbelief.” He thought that Jesus not only could, and would cure his son, but that he would change also the parent’s heart — help his unbelief. This language of our Saviour, when applied to ourselves, amounts to this : You may be saved, if you believe ; and the answer of the father will equally teach us, that a saving faith is the gift of God. But there is another case, even more strong than this. When our Saviour visited his own country, the people received him not as a prophet, for they said. Is not this the carpenter’s son Pf and he did not many mighty works there, because of their unbelief. St. Mark says,J He could do there no mighty work,” — he was not able.§ Nothing can be more strong than this, and the answer to the question before us, is, They who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ are justified thereby, which corresponds exactly with the declara- tion of our own Church in the Eleventh Article, We * Mark ix. 22. i Mark vi. 5. 4 # t Matt. xiii. 55. § oiuic idivaxo. WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? 4& are accounted righteous before God, only for the merits of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by faith,” &c. Is then faith the condition of our being justified ? undoubtedly it is ; but we must explain what is meant by the term, in order to prevent mistakes. The con- dition upon which the goods, which I purchase, become mine, is, that I give an equivalent for them. The condition on which the employer enjoys the services of the labourer is, that he pay him his wages — an equi- valent. For his justification the Christian has no equi- valent which he can pay. Faith is no equivalent for pardon : it is no price at which the pardon is purchased. The condition on which the rebellious subject was par- doned, by his offended monarch, was, that he sued for his pardon. It is that without which he will not be pardoned. We have perhaps used the word condition in two different senses, at least a different idea is con- veyed by it. Faith, then, is that without which no one will be justified. There is one name given under heaven whereby men may be saved, and faith is the means by which we lay hold of that salvation which is offered to lost man. Faith was the means whereby those persons came unto Jesus, in whose favour the miracles were performed. They believed that he could and would do that which they sought for, and therefore they came unto him, and he healed them. The woman, who had an issue of blood, touched the hem of his garment, because she believed that he who wore that vesture could and would cure her. Else why did she touch him } It was not the state of her own mind which was the faith that cured her. She believed in THE ATONEMENT. 43 him who could cure her ; had she trusted in one less able to save, she might not merely have touched the hem, but have wrapped her whole body in the garment, and have felt no benefit thereby ; but she came unto Christ, and he cured her.* And it is this which the Christian must do. He must come unto Christ, trusting that Christ can and will save us — ^will free us from our guilt by his blood — ^will forgive us — ^will place who are condemned in the sight of the Most High, in a state of reconcilia- tion with God ; by taking upon himself that punish- ment which we have deserved, with his stripes we are healed.” He hath laid on him the iniquity of us Almighty Father, who hast given thine only Son to die for our sins, and to rise again for our justification ; grant us so to put away the leaven of malice and wickedness, that we may always serve thee in pureness of living and truth : through the merits of the same thy Son Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. * We may properly say that her faith cured her; by which expression we mean that it rendered her meet to be cured. Christ cured her, because he saw that she had faith to be cured — was in a fit state of mind to receive the blessing. So God justifies those who have faith — who are in a state of mind which renders them meet to receive justification. The healing faith, so to speak, of the woman, had the Almighty power of Christ for its object; justifying faith has the efficacy of his atonement. The object varies, but the nature of the faith is in both instances the same. WHAT IS SANCTIFICATION? Creator Spirit, by whose aid The world’s foundations first were laid, Come, visit every humble mind ; Come, pour Thy joys on human kind ; From sin and sorrow set us free. And make Thy temples worthy Thee. Oh, Source of uncreated light. The Father’s promised Paraclete ! Thrice holy fount, thrice holy fire, Our hearts with heavenly love inspire ; Come, and Thy sacred unction bring To sanctify us, while we sing. Chase from our mind the infernal foe. And peace, the fruit of love, bestow ; And lest our feet should step astray. Protect and guide us in the way ; Make us eternal truths receive. And practise all that we believe ; Give us thyself, that we may see The Father and the Son, by Thee. Immortal honor, endless fame. Attend the Almighty Father’s name ; The Saviour Son be glorified. Who for lost man’s redemption died ; And equal adoration be. Eternal Paraclete, to Thee. WHAT IS SANCTIFICATION? CHAPTER IV. Having explained the docrine of the Antonement, and answered the question, What is Justification ? we will proceed with another of equal importance, and ask — What is Sanctification ? — It is the influence of the Holy Ghost acting upon our hearts, and bringing them into conformity to the will of God. Such a change of heart produced in us, as draws us nigh unto God, and enables us to address our heavenly Father by those endearing titles, which we are in the Bible permitted to employ. Sin not only renders us guilty, and so liable to punishment, but it turns away our affections from the Almighty. The negligent and disobedient servant loves not the presence of his earthly master — he cannot love it. The froward child is dissatisfied with itself, and shuns the eye of his too indulgent parent. And Adam when he had broken the only law which his Maker had given him, tried to conceal himself among the trees of the garden. This is peculiarly the case, after the com- mission of any positive and actual sin. When he, who knows what Christian obedience is, has broken through those restraints, which ordinarily preserve him from the open breach of the law of God, and has done violence to his own better judgment, by transgressing some well-knoWn commandment, he feels disposed to fly from God ; he often tries to hurry himself into society, to engage in buisness, or to join in amusements, for the 48 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? very purpose of avoiding his own reproving thoughts — he is forced to shun the quiet hour of secret medita* tion, because he cannot bear the severity of his own self-convicting heart. But besides the state of him who wilfully offends against the dictates of his own conscience, there is another state which is perhaps further from God. I mean a state of habitual alienation from God — a state of carelessness with regard to God, and every thing pertaining to him — a state of deadness with regard to religion, which in Scripture is forcibly described as the natural state of man. Here then the individual is afar off from God, without being conscious of it ; he imagines himself safe, because others, in equal danger, are apparently equally indifferent. Some zealous Chris- tians would compare the condition of such a person, to that of an unconverted heathen, though if properly considered, it would surely appear to be infinitely worse. The thoughtless Englishman has been admitted, at least outwardly, into covenant with God. He knows this, and cannot help being aware that they who are best able to judge on such a question, esteem this a very great privilege. He has possessed, for every one in England does possess it, the outward means of learning the nature of that religion in which he, together with his fellow-countrymen, profess to believe, and he has wilfully neglected to make use of these means. He knows that Christ Jesus is preached as the author of salvation, and he has never sought to learn what a faith in Christ is — to know what Christianity is, which he so thoughtlessly rejects. Can any one in his senses SANCTIFICATION. 49 compare the state of this man, with that of the idola- trous inhabitant of central India, who has never heard of the name of the Saviour of the world ? The compa- rison must appear absurd. The thoughtless Christian must be infinitely worse in the sight of God. Have we no spiritual privileges as a nation ? What does our Saviour mean when he says. Woe unto thee, Bethsaida ! woe unto thee, Chorazin, for if the mighty works which have been done in thee, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would long ago have repented sitting in sackcloth and ashes. Shall not the Queen of the South rise up in judgment against the men of this generation and condemn it ? Have we not, as a people, the means of hearing those things which many prophets and kings have desired to hear, and have not heard them ? Such men see the general advantages of Chris- tianity, but they will not look into its mysteries. They will not look into those more peculiar doctrines which constitute the very essence of Christianity. They will not seek that which can alone save us in the day of judgment. They close their eyes against it. They see that religion is better than no religion. They see that Christianity is a great blessing to the world, but they have never yet seen their own lost condition with- out a Saviour ; they have never practically felt that without holiness no man shall see the Lord — nay, they have never understood even the theory of Christianity — never understood, that unless our hearts are brought into conformity" to the will of God — unless we be sanctified by the Holy Ghost, we have no just grounds for hoping that we shall ever be made partakers of the 5 50 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? joys which are at the right hand of God. We must first be made sons of God by faith which is in Jesus Christ ; and being sons we must be so sanctified, that our hearts may cry Abba Father. That we may have the feelings, and live the lives of sons of God. What then again is the sanctification here spoken of It is that personal holiness of the heart, which is caused, in the believer, by the presence and influence of the Holy Spirit. The man who is under the guidance of the Comforter, becomes thereby a spiritual Christian. The effect so produced is spoken of in Scripture as the indwelling of God in the heart of man. “ If any man love me,” says our Saviour, he will keep my words ; and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.” St. Paul says, Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you ? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy, for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.” When we are commanded to be perfect, even as our Father which is in heaven is perfect ; this is not a vain form of words, which bids us to do that which it is impossible for us to do. When we are commanded to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling, we are not called on to attempt that to which we are totally inadequate. But a faith in the Everlasting Son of God, holds out to us, sinners though we be, the hope of pardon, the prospect of mercy. And the power of the Spirit of God, v/orking in the souls of those who are his servants, — who are the adopted sons of God, — SANCTIFICATION. 51 enables them to cry Abba Father, and to do all things through Christ that strengtheneth them. The fruits of the Spirit are personal holiness, love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, meekness, tem- perance,” and unless these fruits are growing in us, unless we can discover some evidence of this work of the Lord on our hearts, we have no reason for conclud- ing that we are under grace. All our hope of pardon and of acceptance, is in and through Christ Jesus. We are not pardoned because we have become holy ; we are pardoned because Christ Jesus hath died for us ; and being pardoned and accepted through Jesus Christ our Lord, we become holy through the influence of that Spirit whom our Lord promised to send unto us from the Father. The holiness here spoken of, is not the mere round of external devotion, or of outward duties, however regularly performed, though these are frequently the means of producing this holiness in us. It is a holiness of the heart. It is the image of God impressed on the human soul. Our tempers and affec- tions must become heavenly — our inclinations and wishes must be lifted up towards God. We must love the Lord our God with all our heart, and all our soul, and all our strength — love him, not merely say we love him. We must feel towards him a humble thank- fulness ; inasmuch as he has not withheld his Son, his only Son from us. And this love of God will display itself in such a love towards man, that we shall, not merely desire to love our neighbour as ourselves, but we shall be, in some measure, enabled so to do. It is such a love of God, as will lead us to be blameless in 52 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? all manner of conversation — will make us devote our- selves to the service of God — ^will make us try to fulfil that vow of self-dedication, which we renew whenever we are partakers in the body and blood of Christ. And here we offer and present unto thee, O Lord, ourselves, our souls, and bodies, to be a reasonable, holy, and lively sacrifice unto thee.’’ It must be evident to every one who is at all acquainted with the state of his own heart, that the frame of mind here described, cannot flow from any source within ourselves. That the change in our natural temper here spoken of, must proceed from a more than human influence. So that if this change in the heart and affections be necessary for every one, — if no one can enter into the kingdom of God, either here or hereafter, except through a faith in Christ, and except his heart be brought by that faith, and through the influence of the Holy Ghost, into a holy frame, it will hardly be necessary for me to prove, that our own Church is right in teaching us to pray, That we being regenerate and made God’s children by adoption and grace, may daily be renewed by the Holy Spirit.” — That we may be, not only brought under the saving influence of the Gospel, being led to place all our hopes and confidence in the atonement of Christ. — That we may, not only have been once baptized with water and the Holy Spirit — have once partaken of the inward, as well as the outward part of the sacrament of baptism — but that we may have been, and may daily be continued, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit of God. SANCTIFICATION. 53 Does any one ask, why such a change, why such an influence is necessary for every son of Adam ? Does he know his own heart ? Is he acquainted with the evil dispositions, which are but too apt to gain domi- nion, where peace, and joy, and heavenly love should ever reign ? Is he aware how many unclean spirits dwell in that body of his, which ought to be a temple set apart for the Holy Ghost ? how envy, or spite, or malice, or uncleanness, or ambition, or revenge, or avarice, or pride are apt to take up their abode, where nothing but love and peace, Christian love and Chris- tian peace, ought to be admitted ? Does he know himself.^ He esteems himself safe perhaps because thousands beside him are in equal peril. But will it satisfy us to be cast into hell, provided others are con- signed to the same place of eternal penalty ? Will their pangs relieve ours ? Will it be any consolation to us, if others are joined with us in the same unceasing misery : “ Wide is the gate, and broad is the way, and many there be that go in thereat.” Does he know that we are all, by nature, the children of wrath ? — that by one man’s disobedience mam^ * were made sinners ? Does he know that all have sinned and come short of the glory of God ? Does he feel that he himself has sinned ? followed that which is evil, and neglected that which is good ? has trifled with God, and given way to the world, the flesh, and the devil ? If he look into his own heart, he may kno w it — if he examine his past life he may see it. But why, he continues, may 1 not The many, the mass, 6^ nol^ol. 5 * 54 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? do as well as my neighbours ? My dear friend, you may do as well as your neighbours, but narrow is the gate.” We will next enquire how this alteration and change in the state of our heart is to be effected. First, I would observe that though all such spiritual influence must depend on God, and on him only, yet as far as human eye can see, and as far as we can learn from the Word of God, much is left to the agency and instrumentality of man. We may either quench the Spirit, or employ those means of grace with which the Almighty has provided us : and humanly speaking, the same faith which is the means whereby we accept of pardon, is the means too by which we are sanctified. We are pardoned, because we trust in Christ who died for us, and the believing that Christ will make us holy is the means by which we are made holy. As the Spirit of God works in us to believe in Christ, before we can become partakers of the forgiveness purchased by his death — so through believing this, the Holy Spirit works in us a holiness, with which we should otherwise never have been blessed. It cuts at the root of any imagination of our own worth or merit, and creates that humility which is absolutely required of all who are God’s people. We cannot be devoted to God, unless we are convinced of our total depen- dence on him ; and the feeling that we are lost, and saved only by the death of Christ, produces this effect in us ; it makes us sensible of our own dependence, makes us long for a holiness which we do not possess, and devote ourselves, body and soul, to the service of SANCTIFICATION. 55 God. The conviction of the necessity of this holiness, this change of heart, which must proceed from God, and not from ourselves, will make us pray for that help of the Holy Ghost without which no sanctification can take place in our souls. The conviction of our own personal want of holiness, the conviction of the absence of that spirituality, which constitutes the very essence of sanctification ; the conviction that without this, we are not God’s servants here, and shall not be accepted by him hereafter ; that we are not God’s sons, because we do not cry Abba, Father, — are all so many steps by which the Spirit of God changes our hearts, brings us from a natural to a spiritual state. They are so many steps, for the Scriptures describe sanctification as a gradual work. The expressions used, with regard to the spread of the Gospel over the world, are equally applicable to the growth of it in our own hearts — First the blade, then the ear, then the full corn in the ear.” There must be a beginning, and as in all cases, it is the first step which is the real difficulty, many sincere friends of Christianity seem to attribute too much to the first step. They introduce ideas which create indistinctness. They apply language, (which was perfectly intelligible, when applied to Jews of mature age, in our Saviour’s days) to persons situated as we are now, without qualifying the expres- sions. There will be no advantage in entering into controversial discussion, but it may be useful to state briefly that which is frequently misunderstood in the doctrines of our own Church, on this subject. Our Church applies the term ‘‘ being born again” to 56 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? the grace which is granted in baptism, and presumes that the child of Christian parents, admitted into the family of Christ, and brought up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord, may never have fallen from grace, may have been, not always nor ever perfect ; but always the servant of the Lord Jesus Christ, and so advancing in the path of Christian holiness, by a constant supply of God’s grace. We cannot help perceiving that the mass of any community, nominally Christian, is not living in a state of grace ; is not guided by the Holy Spirit of God ; and therefore the children of such persons do not continue in the state into which they were admitted by baptism — probably they have never been walking in a state of grace ; but why need we define that with which we are unac- quainted from the Word of God } It is however clear, that with regard to those who are brought from this state, into a state of grace, the change must have been effected by the power of God, by the influence of the Holy Ghost : and yet we have no right to identify this grace with the conversion and baptism of a heathen adult. We should create a great confusion with regard to infant baptism, a great confu- sion with regard to the doctrines and services of our own Church, not to say a confusion in the language of holy Scripture, if we attempted to describe under the same terms ideas so very far distant from each other, as the cases of an unconverted heathen, and of a person, who having formerly, at baptism, been admitted into the Church of Christ, has lived in a total neglect of Christianity as to its sanctifying doctrines, and that SANCTIFICATION. 57 holiness without which no man shall see the Lord. The most degraded heathen will in the day of judg- ment rise up against him and condemn him, because he has neglected to employ that light which has been most mercifully granted. The whole question of baptismal regeneration is one on which a great diversity of expression may be used without very great difference of opinion. Few will venture to deny that grace is granted to the baptized infant upon his outward admission into the Church of Christ. The Church of England teaches that such grace is given, and declares the child when baptized, to be regenerate ; applying this term to the grace so given, without defining its quality or extent. She teaches too That after we have received the Holy Ghost we may depart from grace given, and fall into sin.” So that in this view of the question, it is no proof that the man is not regenerate, because he is not walking under grace — he may have fallen from grace — he may indeed never have been under grace, in the sense which some persons apply to the term “regenerate,” but such persons must remember that such a use of the word arises from themselves and not from the Church. The state of the baptized Christian may be illus- trated by that of the circumcised Israelite. Our Saviour says,* “ I know that ye are Abraham’s seed,” and yet he immediately after adds, “ If ye were Abra- ham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.” Baptism is a pledge to assure us of grace given — not John viii. 37. 58 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? of grace growing^ or even continued. The prodigal in the far country is still a son, and if he have grace to come to himself and to return, he may be assured that he is a son. Almighty God, who hast given us thy only begotten Son to take our nature upon him, and to be born of a pure Virgin ; grant that we being regenerate, and made thy children by adoption and grace, may daily be renewed by thy Holy Spirit ; through the same our Lord Jesus Christ, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the same Spirit, ever one God, world without end. Amen. FREENESS OF THE ATONEMENT. Ye that in these courts are found, Listening to the Gospel sound ; Lost and guilty as ye are ; Full of sorrow, sin, and care ; Glorify the King of kings ; Take the peace the Gospel brings. Turn to Christ your suppliant eyes View’ His perfect sacrifice ; See in Him your sins forgiven ; Follow in His steps to heaven ; Glorify the King of kings ; Take the peace the Gospel brings. THE FREENESS OF THE ATONEMENT- CHAPTER V. When we look at any point connected with salvation, there are two aspects in which a wise man will regard it : one as it belongs to the question generally, the other as it refers personally to ourselves ; and, of course, the latter of these two is, beyond compare, the most important to us. It is a matter of curiosity, to examine how far the sacrifice offered by Christ can be said to extend to the whole world ; but it is one of vital interest to ascertain whether we are included within the limits of the general offer. We have, in the pre- ceding chapters, examined the leading features which characterize Christianity ; we have seen the importance of believing in Jesus as a Saviour, and the blessing of being under the influence of the Holy Ghost, but still there may be a question, not only how far we are par- takers of this great advantage, but how far we are capable of being so. We see that all are not sharers in these special privileges. Our minds may say, how far are all of us capable of becoming so ? Whoever considers the infinite value of salvation, and imagines that some mistake of his own, concerning the terms on which it is proposed to man, may exclude him from the benefit of the gracious offer, must be dead to every sense of his own interest, or he must be mad, if he continue one moment without trying to 6 62 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? look to the bottom of the question. There may be difficulties, even to the last. There may, and will, be some points on which we shall wish for more full information — some doubts which we should gladly see cleared up ; but in a matter of such paramount im- portance, he that doubteth is damned. The mere fact of our going on in doubt, shows that all is not right with us. If a question were raised as to the solvency of a bank, and we knew that some of the most influen- tial partners did themselves mistrust the state of the establishment, but were still unwilling to enter on a full investigation of its solvency, what would be the impression on the mind of an indifferent person ? If the partner doubts, and does not examine, he is con- demned by the very nature of the case. It may be wiser under many circumstances not to enter on an investigation ; but the fact of their declining to do so, passes on the bank a sentence which nothing can wipe off. He who goes on, notwithstanding his doubts, is condemned by the mere doing so. There may be parts of the concerns of the bank with which the partner, so declining to examine, may not be entirely conversant ; he may be forced to say, I cannot answer this or that question, but of the whole I have no doubt. I do not investigate, because I have no doubt. The mere investigation would imply and create a doubt, when in truth I have none. This would be the language of an honest man ; but if he doubted, he would be con- demned by the mere doubt. The Christian may say. How far God has offered eternal life to every created being, I do not know, “ seek ye to enter in at the FREENESS OF THE ATONEMEN'r. 63 straight gate.” That he has offered it to all baptized Christians, I have no doubt. That he does offer it to all to whom the word of God is preached, I have no doubt. That it is the duty of every Christian to try to preach the Gospel to the whole world, I have no doubt. That Christ died for all, I have no doubt ; nor have I any doubt that many are called, but few chosen.” Here then, as a practical question, bearing on the salvation of the individual, there is ground enough on which every humble Christian may stand. He believes that God willeth all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth,” — all men — as far as the will of God is concerned, — not saved without coming to the truth, — but saved by coming to the truth. The most willing father cannot be reconciled to his offending children, unless they wish for recon- ciliation. God has established laws which he will not break, and the sinfulness of men may exclude from the mercy of God. There may be a difficulty in under- standing how this can be so — how there can be any- thing which an Almighty Being can will, and yet not do. There is, and always will be, a metaphysical diffi- culty in this — there is no practical difficulty. We act on such sort of points ever}^ day of our lives. God may give a free will to his creature, whom ho willetli to be saved, and that free will may be exercised in opposition to the will of God, but the offer is a free gift on the part of God. Free to all, as far as we are concerned ; and the freedom imposes on us most important duties : the duty of accepting the offer made to us — the duty of trying to make the offer to 64 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? others — to all others. Why ! God should make another man’s salvation to hinge on our exertions, may be a difficulty to some minds ; but it is perfectly consistent with that law which visiteth the iniquity of the fathers on the third and fourth generations.” In all such questions, the difficulty exists in some stage or other of the examination : one human being may see further into God’s dealings than another, but there is a point at which every one stops ; but this point is always beyond the practical question. God never leaves us in doubt as to what we are to do, or what we are not to do ; this is almost always quite clear — clear as to our general line of conduct. The difficulty begins when we wish to pr}^ beyond the practical question. Some persons may conceive that they are rejec^d, but, probably, no one would pretend, that the offer of salvation was never made to them. When we begin to inquire, the door seems to be always open — Christ Jesus is the propitiation, not only for our sins, but for the sins of the whole world. The rock on which the believer builds his hopes, is one which divine mercy has placed as the common founda- tion for every Christian building. The superstructure may be different, but there is but one safe foundation, and that is one to which we are all invited to come — it is Come unto me, all ye that travail and are heavy laden.” This is a free call — a call made to all. It is an invitation to accept of a great favour which has been conferred on us. The favour has been conferred^ it remains for us to accept it.* Redemption is that which has been done for us by Christ, without our having FREENESS OF THE ATONEMENT. 65 at all participated in the thing done. We may, or may not, accept it ; but if we believe not, he abideth faithful. The free pardon is signed and sealed, without any instrumentality on our part ; has been signed and sealed since the day that Christ rose from the dead, triumphing over sin and death. If we trust in this, we shall be saved, i. e., if we really trust. This faith, this trusting, is also a free gift of God ; but this is ordinarily wrought b}* means : human agents are often, almost always perhaps, instrumentally concerned in producing this faith. We are ourselves probably, of all agents, those who are most concerned in producing this faith. We limit not God’s power or will. We say not how he may act. The only question which we seek to answer is, how he does work. The ten thou- sand events which have insensibly contributed to pro- duce a faith in Christ in the mind of the humble Eng- lish Christian, are God’s doing, as much as the light from heaven which changed the faith of St. Paul. That man must be a bold reasoner, who would say that St. Paul might not have resisted even this call ; or who would say, that the Pharisees, who saw the mira- cles of our Saviour, did not reject a call from heaven ; and if any one denies that many of those with whom we live, do reject that which God purposed to have led them to a faith in Christ, he must, I think, know very little of what is actually going on around us. In this investigation it is of the utmost importance to keep in mind, that the whole difficulty which embar- rasses us, is a logical difficulty which created as great perplexity to the Stoics as it presents to the Christian. 6 ^ 66 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? The fatality of the Greek tragedians is abstractedly as difficult to be understood as the doctrine of predestina- tion ; but practically there is no difficulty — practically we all acknowledge that faith is wrought in us by means, and is prevented by the non-use of means. The limit of those means belongs to our heavenly Father, but the use of the means he has given to us, and woe be to us if we use them not. But it may be said, — May we not desire to partake in these blessings, and yet never obtain them } for our Lord says, — Many shall seek to enter in and not be able.” But if we look at these very words, we shall find that his argument is this, — Strive to enter in with all your might, for if you do not strive now^ you will seek, when it is too late, with all earnestness and im- portunity to enter in, but to no purpose. A line of argument which seems most clearly to imply a freeness on the part of God. Of course there is a point where God will cut off the offender. It is not for us to say when the Almighty began to harden Pharaoh’s heart ; we know that he did harden it ; but if we fairly exam- ine any of those texts which alarm the minds of penitent and doubting Christians, I think we may feel convinced that men are condemned by their continuance in impenitence, and not by the refusal of pardon to the penitent. The case of Esau (Heb. xii. 16 ) refers to an earthly, rather than a spiritual advantage. The whole line of reasoning, if fairly examined, seems to amount to no more than this, — that he did wrong, and could never do away the effects of his own mad conduct — he could not recover his birthright. And undoubtedly FREENESS OF THE ATONEMENT. 67 the same is at the present day true in spiritual things He who by his sin had allowed an evil temper, a wrong passion, to master him, will, perhaps, during his whole life, find it necessary to seek for pardon with tears ; and may, to his dying day, find a temporal as well as a spiritual curse affixed to his transgression — a punish- ment which attends him to his last hour, and of which the very object may be, to save him, by leading him daily and humbly to Christ Jesus. So again : (Heb. vi. 4,) v/here it is said, that it is impossible to renew those w’ho have fallen after grace ; St. Paul does not say that they cannot be renewed, but that the preacher of Christianity has no means of renewing them — has no new offer to make to them.* If then God produces faith in us by means, and if he places the means before us, and we refuse to em- ploy them, surely there is nothing to take away from the freeness of the offer. We can hardly practically * Unless T am greatly mistaken, the active sense of the verb is not only the most grammatical, but suits the chain of argu- ment much better than any other. “ Many of you,” says the Apostle, “have so gone backward, that you stand in need of milk and not of strong meat. (v. 12.) You need to be instructed in the first principles of that religion in which you ought to be teachers ; to these I cannot now refer, I must try to lead you forv'ard towards perfection, (vi. 1.) If they who have been made partakers of the heavenly gift, and enjoyed the same privileges as myself, have crucified the Lord of Life afresh, and put him to an open shame, what can I do for their conversion — {ddvvaxov avoLnaivl'Ceiv alg fiei&voLav). It is im- possible for me to renew them, to convert them to that faith from which they have fallen.” 68 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? doubt of the want of faith existing among the great mass of nominal Christians ; they show by their lives that they do not believe the Gospel to be true ; they may deny nothing — they act as if they did not believe. They do not seem to consider the state of trial in which we are placed, and that we are drawing nearer either to heaven or to hell every day of our lives. They do not seem to believe that there is a prospect of hell before them ; that there are means whereby we may escape this place of torment, and that God freely offers them the means of escaping. They do not seem to believe that unless they lay hold of this one name b}" which we may be saved, they will perish ever- lastingly. Some persons are shocked at the strength of this expression, perish everlastingly,” as repeated in the Athanasian Creed. The only question is — Is it true ? Is there no other means of salvation than through Christ } If so, where is the harshness of speaking the truth, when the truth can alone free us from death eternal ? A free offer of pardon and acceptance is made us through Christ Jesus, and there is no other means of acceptance — so free, that at the day of judgment, every Christian who is con- demned will say : — My own obstinacy brought on me this just punishment. God was merciful, but I re- jected his mercy. God said unto me — Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved,” — and I did not believe in this only Saviour. FREENESS OF THE ATONEMENT. 09 O Almighty God, who alone canst order the unruly wills and affections of sinful men ; grant unto Thy people, that they may love the thing which Thou com- mandest, and desire that which Thou dost promise ; that so, among the sundry and manifold changes of the world, our hearts may surely there be fixed, where true joys are to be found, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. THE FREENESS OF SANCTIFICATION. CHAPTER VI. In the last chapter we have come to the conclusion that the offer of salvation is freely made to every baptized Christian ; but it may be doubted whether our line of reasoning has not carried us even beyond this ; and it may be asked whether the same arguments will not lead us to conclude, that as Christ Jesus died for all, all men must be justified. It may be asked, — If Redemption be wrought for us, without any effort of our own, why may it not be extended to the Hindoo as well as to the Englishman F — to the heathen as well as to the Christian ? And our answer must be, — Because God, whose we are, and whom we serve, has ordained that men shall come to the knowledge of the truth, in order that they may be saved. It is not that we pretend to say that he might not have ordered it otherwise, but that from his word we learn that he has ordered it so ; and he has also said, that “ without holiness no man shall see the Lord.” And without the grace of God, by faith, men do not become holy. A Christian missionary, whose eye has been opened to the purity of God, and the defilements which are in man, is aware of the degradation of the heathen, — of the debased state of mind into which mankind fall, when the mass of society is not salted with the salt of Christianity, — when there are none of God’s servants FREENESS OF SANCTIFICATION. 71 to season the lump. Men who live in the society of those who call themselves Christiansj and among whom there are many who are governed by the spirit of the Gospel, do not know how much they owe to the secret influence of God’s servants. The ten righteous persons not only prevent God from destroying the city, but they do prevent the city from being such as God would destroy. The mass of the world are not at all aware of the Christian meaning of the expression — A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.” The master of a large school is soon aware of the secret and injurious influence of two or three malicious, ill-disposed boys : they raise up a spirit among their fellows which soon displays itself. But he would not be conscious of the beneficial effect of two or three good boys : they prevent evil of the existence of which he is not aware ; he may learn it afterwards, but at the time the evil is prevented, and he knows neither his escape nor the secret cause of it. The mass of the world do not see the depravity of human nature. A man who was not influenced by Christianity, would not be aware of the depravity of the heathen among whom he lived ; he would not see that they were worse than a Christian society ; his own mind would soon get infected by the depravity around him, and he would lose sight of the exceeding sinful- ness of sin. Such a man who was living at Benares, would not be conscious that the people were much worse than they are in London. There may be some points in which they are not worse — to our shame be it spoken ; but a Christian missionary would see that amongst the guilt and depravity of England — of that 72 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? which was worst in England — there was a salt which prevented such a degree of corruption as he would behold amongst the heathen. The Christian community- may be the more guilty though the less impure — acting more against the convictions of conscience. But the most impure of the heathen is guilty on account of his impurity, because God has given him a means of ad- vancing in holiness, to which he has not attained, and which he has rejected against his better judgment. I conceive that the reasoning of St. Paul to the Romans always has been and always will be true. Rom. i. 18 — “ For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness ; because that which may be known of God, is manifest in them ; for God hath showed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead ; so that they are without excuse : because that when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful ; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncor- ruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds and four-footed beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to unclean- ness through the lusts of their own hearts.” God gave that to man, to every created man, which would have led him to a better state than that in which he stands. The most impure would have been less defiled, had he FREENESS OF SANCTIFICATION. 73 not cast away that knowledge, that aid witn which God had supplied him. He is guilty, because he might have been better. Video meliora proboque.’’ It would be folly to assert that every man might have attained to Christian holiness; but every man’s own heart will confess, that he might have attained to a greater degree of holiness than he has attained to. But Christian holiness is not such a perfection as man may attain unto by himself, but it is such a state as God’s grace will produce in man. Now it is clear that Christian holiness has not been offered to every man, for the Gospel has never yet been preached to the majority of mankind. But if to every man a greater degree of holiness has been pro- posed, than he has ever attained to, it is clear, that Christians who have not attained to Christian holiness have stopped short through their own fault. If Chris- tian holiness, as all other holiness, is to be attained by degrees, and men stop short through their own fault, — if holiness is to be attained by means, and men will not accept of those means, which are proposed to them by the mercy of God, it seems clear that the rejection is an act of the man himself, who refuses that which the Almighty offers. Men often excuse themselves on the plea that they cannot become holy save through the influence of the Holy Ghost, — have they ever examined into the question whether they have not themselves rejected grace when it was proffered to them } Christ died for all, but they only are made partakers of the benefit of that death who believe in the vSon of God. Our Saviour says, “If ye being 74 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? evil know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him ?” — i. e. If we ask, we shall have grace given unto us. It might be objected that some men may not have grace to ask : we know that some men do not ask ; but it may be safely left to the decision of any man’s own conscience, whether God has not enabled him to see the propriety, the wisdom, the duty of asking for grace, and whether he himself has not been negligent in asking. The freedom and fulness of God’s grace to baptized Christians — to those who are living in a Christian country, to whom the outward means of grace are always open — consists of this : Not that God forces his holiness upon all, but that there is no one to whom the means of sancti- fication are not so far open that he will truly say — God called me to holiness, and I might have been more holy had I but used those means which the Almighty has placed before me ; my present want of holiness is my own fault. The freeness with which sanctification is proposed to us seems to differ in its nature and character from the freeness with which justification is offered to us. It is easy to conceive that a person may live all their life in England, and yet never be aware of the nature of the Gospel, — of the free offer of pardon, through a Redeemer’s blood, made to lost man ; he must have heard the words, — he may never have received the idea into his mind ; it is easy to conceive that a person shall have lived in England, and have no idea that the grace of God is necessary to enable us to become holy ; but it is not FREENESS OF SANGTIFICATION. 75 easy to conceive a person who believes that Christ Jesus died for him, and who wishes to be the servant of Christ, and yet imagines that the holiness which he sees that he needs, is denied him through any other cause than his own neglect of using those means which God has appointed. Nevertheless, there are perhaps many such persons ; and it is probable that a misunderstanding of the doctrine of Christ’s imputed righteousness may have tended to increase the number of such unhappy individuals. Under the name Im- puted righteousness,” two totally distinct ideas are frequently conveyed. Some persons would understand by it, that which is laid down in the third chapter of this book, — We are pardoned for Christ’s sake — With his stripes we are healed ; Christ’s righteous- ness is thus imputed to us. Others would say, — No one can fulfil the whole law, — No man can become holy as our Father which is in heaven is holy, — All our holiness is as filthy rags, we must be clothed upon therefore with the holiness of Christ’s righteousness imputed to us — not our own, but Christ’s ; i. e. they substitute a holiness worked for us, for a holiness worked in us. And in a practical point of view, the difference between the two views is enormous. As far as merit is concerned, there is no difference of opinion. No man, who knows what Christian holiness is, will ever venture to enter into an examination of his own merits. Both these parties seek for pardon and acceptance through Christ. We pray him to accept our unholy holiness; not to weigh it, but to forgive it. But in one case, the sinner hopes 76 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? to be made holy in this life, to be made more and more holy continually, day by day growing in grace : in the other case, he hopes that he shall be clothed with Christ’s holiness ; he expects that the sanctifica- tion of his heart shall be done for him, and not in him. Both agree that it must be God’s doing ; one believes that it is done without us, without any co-operation on our part; the other, that it is done in us, by God, and that the instrument is the using such means as God has appointed. I need hardly add, that in my opinion, the term imputed righteousness is equivocal, and not being used in sacred Scripture in the second sense, it is much better not to employ it ; though I cannot help fearing that many persons neglect to use the means which God has appointed to make us holy, because they have a vague idea of being made holy without the use of means. In a false species of humility they look up to God, to do that for them which God can alone effect, but which he has appointed to be effected by means placed with their reach. The freeness then of justification and of sanctifica- tion are equally great ; both are offered to us — to every baptized Christian placed as we are ; but they are offered in a different way. Christ died for all, and God has offered to each of us a share in this pardon : * The term “imputed righteousness” may he applied to either “justification” or “sanctification;” in the first case it agrees with the doctrine of the Xlth Article. When applied to sanctification, it is likel}^ to lead to a very false view of Chris- tian holiness, and to avoid the danger of this misapplication, I esteem it safer not to employ the term. FREENESS OF SANCTIFICATION. 7 we may reject it, but God offers it to us freely. He offers to ever}^ one of us the means of becoming holy. He says, — Pray, and I will give you grace. The sinner says, — I cannot pra}". But he may ask God to enable him — God will do so. He sends his ministers — he appoints his sacraments — he has enabled many of his servants to write books tending to the edification of their brethren: all these are means of grace. They will not avail of themselves. God offers these outward means to every man in England ; but, believe me, God never did, and never will deny his grace — that inward grace which can alone purify the heart — to such as humbly employ those means which he has given us. In this sense, sanctification is freely offered to us all ; and we shall be without excuse, if at the day of judg- ment we are without it. O Almighty Lord, and everlasting God, vouchsafe, we beseech thee, to direct, sanctify, and govern, both our hearts and bodies in the ways of thy laws, and in the works of thy commandments ; that through thy most mighty protection, both here and ever, we may be preserved in body and soul ; through our Lord and Savour Jesus Christ. Amen. SANCTIFICATION THE FRUIT OF JUSTIFICATION. CHAPTER VII. From what has been already said, it will appear that both Redemption and Sanctification are offered to all baptized Christians. As a practical question, it will not be necessary to examine how far the offer is made to those who do not partake of the same privileges as ourselves ; but it will be of consequence for us to see how one who is not at the present moment walking under grace, may become partaker of that which he needs, — how he may become a lively member of that Church of Christ, into which he has been admitted, — how he may accept of that salvation which is graciously proffered to him, — ^howhe may experience the renewing influence of that grace which our heavenly Father promises to give to those who ask him. How is he to begin } Is he to try to become holy that he may believe on Christ Jesus as a Saviour ? or is he to believe on the Saviour that he may become holy ? Which is to come first in the order of the Christian life. Sanctifica- tion or Justification ^ I was very much confused the other day, said Euse- bius to a clerical friend, when a member of my congre- gation, with whom I was conversing on the doctrines of Justification and Sanctification, asked me this question, — Is Sanctification the consequence of Justification, or are we justified because we are made holy Now if you had been asked this same question, what answer SANCTIFICATION, ETC. 79 should you have given to it ? 1 should, said the friend, have tried to avoid the question ; I should perhaps have asked my applicant, whether men are made active by taking much exercise, or took much exercise because they’ were active ? And I will tell you why I should have done this. Such questions are more frequently asked out of* a foolish curiosity, than from any sound desire of being instructed on the subject. Now the real difficulty of such questions exists full as much in the nature of things, as in the particular case before us. Causes and effects are so blended together, that it is frequently not easy to say which of the two takes place first. — Activity disposes the man to take exercise, and taking exercise makes him active. I do not mean to place this difficulty on exactly the same grounds as the other, for we must always be cautious in not carrying our analogies too far ; but I should be glad to show the applicant that my silence did not depend on my being unable to answer him, but on my being unwilling to gratify a useless curiosity. People take up logical difficulties, connect them with Christianity, and then attribute the difficulty to Christianity. The difficulties connected with predestination did exist, and would have continued to perplex mankind, had Christianity never been revealed. They exist in connexion with Christianity, but are not peculiar to it. So in this case, these two doctrines are so closely connected with each other, that as far as human eye can see, the effects arising from them always go on together. A faith in Christ as a Saviour, produces holiness of heart and of life ; and as these grow, they continually tend to 80 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? augment the faith of the person so growing in holi- ness. But surely, replied Eusebius, there must be a right way of discussing these questions, and you must allow, that to try to put me off when I make the enquiry in a quiet, humble way, without giving me any distinct reply, is not likely to satisfy any one. Did not our Lord himself do this very thing when they asked him irrelevant questions ? Yes, but he gave the answer virtually, while he silenced the enquirers. In the case of the tribute money he virtually said, — Why do you ask me so ensnaring a question ? have you not already practically answered your own question by employing the Roman coin } In the case of the seven brethren, he says, — Your question, however craftily contrived, only proves one thing — that you are judging of heaven by an earth- ly standard, and display your own ignorance of the sacred Scriptures. So that even granting that my question is irrelevant, which I do not allow, your answer must either virtually contain a reply to my question, or I shall still have the example to which you yourself have appealed, against you. And have I not virtually answered your question when I said that faith produces holiness } But then you said that holiness produced faith. No ; I think I only said that holiness tended to aug- ment faith ; but if I must say what I think on this sub- ject, I will do so as clearly as I can. I omit the case of the Christian who has never fallen from that state of grace into which he was admitted at infant baptism. SANCTIFICATION, ETC. 81 for though I would never omit the mention of the case, and though I believe that the case may exist, and might be of ordinary occurrence if Christians were living in such a state of holiness as a community of believers might attain to, yet in the present state of the world, such instances must be so rare as not to require much discussion ; omitting, therefore, this, and refer- ring to persons situated as we are, I should say that the pardon must come before the holiness, or that we must be justified before we are sanctified — ^we must be reconciled to God before we can try to please God. Still, said Eusebius, if a father had banished his son from his presence on account of his profligate conduct, the son might be reformed, even without there being any reconciliation with his father ; and the reform in the son might be the cause of a future reconciliation between them. True, but had the father known what was taking place in the mind of the son, — had there been that communion between this father and son, which even the worst of sinners holds with our heavenly Father, how would your case stand then } And consider that the sanctification of which we are speaking, is not the reforming ourselves, but the holiness wrought in us by the floly Ghost — not making ourselves holy, but being made holy — not merely the pra3"ers and alms which have come up for a memorial before God, but the Holy Spirit falling on them that hear the word. There are degrees of faith. There is, ‘‘Lord, I believe, help thou mine unbelief.” There are degrees of grace and holiness ; but if we believe in the doctrine of original 82 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? sin, I do not see how we can expect holiness to be ingrafted, till the taint has been taken away ; and God commendeth his love towards us, in that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us. I cannot help beli(wing too that some light may be thrown on this question by examining certain texts wherein these doctrines are spoken of. Rom. vi. 22 — Being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life. Where the steps are, being made free from sin, (by believing in the atonement offered by Christ,) ye have entered into his service, and been made holy. And it may be observed, that the Greek word here translated holiness,” is more properly rendered by the term sanctification,”* i. e. being made holy. 1 Cor. i. 30 — But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom and righteous- ness and sanctification and redemption.” Who has proved to us the author of all these blessings ; having opened our eyes, justified us, made us holy, and has brought us back from that thraldom into which we had fallen. Where the order seems to be justification and then sanctification. * ^AyicKafibg occurs ten times in the Epistles. In our trans- lation it is five times rendered “ holiness,” — five times “ sanc- tification.” In two of these five, the terms are so nearly equiva- lent that no great injury is done to the meaning (1 Tim. ii. 15 ; Heh. xii. 14 :) in the three others (Rom. vi. 19 and 22 ; 1 Thess. iv. 7,) the sense would be improved by the adoption of “ sanc- tification.” The w^ord itself, from its construction, signifies “ being made holy.” SANCTIFICATIOM, ETC. 83 1 Cor. vi. 11 — And such were some of you; but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justi- fied, in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.” Where, at first sight, the order seems reversed; but the sentence may be taken thus: Ye have received the outward and the inward washing of water and the spirit ; ye are justified by being admit- ted into the family of Christ, and are made holy through the Holy Ghost. Where the two operations seem to stand in the order assumed in this chapter, but to be mentioned twice. There are several other passages where the two operations are mentioned in juxta-position, but they do not really bear on the question. More stress may appear to be laid on this species of argument than it deserves ; but it should be remem- bered, that these texts have been brought forward, not to establish a theory, but merely to confirm a conclu- sion drawn from other sources. The argument is this : By examining the words of St. Paul, when he is incidentally mentioning the subject, it would seem that the order here lai(J down is that which existed in his mind. And besides, 1 think that the correctness of the answer which I have given you, may be confirmed, at least between us, by an appeal to the Articles of the Church, and the words of the XVIIth Article do seem to me to set the question at rest, as far as the decision of our own Church, ought to be binding on us as churchmen. The steps as laid down in the Article are : The calling. The obeying the call. The justifi- 84 WHAT IS CHRISTI ANITY ? cation. The adoption. The being made like the image of Christ (i.e. sanctified.) The good works. The eter- nal salvation. ‘^Wherefore they which be endued with so excellent a benefit of God, — be called according to God’s purpose by his Spirit working in due season : — They through grace obey the calling : — They be justi- fied freely : — They be made sons of God by adoption : — They be made like the image of his only begotten Son Jesus Christ : — They walk religiously in good works, — and at length by God’s mercy, they attain to everlasting felicity.” Here there is no separation be- tween justification and sanctification, but the one is placed before the other in the order which I have assigned to them in my answer. So again the order observed in the confession in the morning and evening service, is, spare and then restore — pardon us, and then sanctify us ; and to my ideas the very nature of the case seems to demand this order. But what makes you so anxious to settle this point } First for my own satisfaction, and secondly because I think that indistinctness in religious matters is a very great evil. All men see that pardon and restora- tion to a state of holiness, from which we have fallen, is necessary. Some persons would make the whole to consist in the pardon, some in the re-established holiness, and the consequence is, that some schemes of religious instruction practically neglect the atonement — some seem to leave out of sight that growth in holiness which is the very life of Christianity. They do not look to the steps in the same order in which St. Peter lays them dov n. Repent and be baptized SANCTIFICATION, F;rC. 85 every one of you in the name of Jesus CJhrist for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.” Every Christian ought from his baptism to have been brought up and to have lived as the servant of the Lord Jesus Christ. The Holy Ghost would then have enabled us to grow in grace from day to daj^ — would have turned every external circum- stance by which we have been surrounded into an instrument of good for our souls. But this has not been our course. We have turned aside from the right path, and have been corrupted by following the world, the flesh, and the devil. The great mass of those who are on all sides of us, are doing so still. God in mercy hath not so dealt with us, as to allow us to go on in this broad path of destruction. He hath not permitted iniquity to be our ruin. He hath enabled some among the mass of rebels to lay hold of Christ Jesus once more as a Saviour. We are brought, through means pro- vided by the mercy of God, to a sense of our real state. Like the prodigal we are enabled to come to ourselves — to say within our own hearts, ‘‘ Father, I have sin- ned against heaven and before thee, and am no more worthy to be called thy son ; make me as one of thy hired servants.” We remember the words of St. John. If any man sin we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous, and he is the pro- pitiation for our sins.” But when we have arrived at this point, when we have reason for hoping that we are accepted as reconciled penitents, as justified through the blood of Christ, many persons seem to stop here and to be satisfied. They are perhaps, from their cir- 8 86 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? cumstances in life, apparently shut out from the pro- spect of much external usefulness, and they forget that the work of sanctification is that which God has in mercy assigned to every Christian, and that this work is to becarried on through the whole of our earthly existence. A work done in us by the Holy Spirit through such means as God has appointed.* The subjects of a gracious and kind monarch have rebelled, and upon being conquered, a free pardon is offered to all, and in order that each individual may stand with their king as he did before — he must not only accept the pardon, but he must try to show that he has again become a faithful subject — and to do this he must feel once more towards his monarch what he felt before the rebellion. He must try to promote the glory of that monarch by proclaiming the mercy which has delivered him, but he can never do this unless he feel assured of the reconciliation granted under the free pardon. The pardon is necessary to the reconcilia- tion ; and unless the reconciliation takes place, what ground have the pardoned rebels for presuming that their pardon is real ^ How can we believe that we are the children of God, unless the Spirit bear witness with * In order to prevent any mistake, it may be observed, that sanctification is the work which the Holy Spirit carries on in the human soul, the process by which he renews it, or makes it holy. It is a work which has its beginning, its progress, and its completion. The influence of the Spirit must precede, ac- company, and follow justification. The object of these pages is not to separate sanctification and justification, but to show that a faith in Christ is the means by which we obtain holiness, and would be vain unless it did so obtain it. SANCTIFICATION, ETC. 87 our spirit that we are so ? That we are the servants of God through Christ, are walking as the redeemed of the Lord, and are daily preparing for that better state to which we hope to be admitted, when this mortal shall have put on immortality. Grant, O Lord, that as we are baptized into the death of thy blessed Son our Saviour Jesus Christ, so by continual mortifying our corrupt affections we may be buried wdlh him ; and that through the grave and gate of death, we may pass to our joyful resurrection ; for his merits, who died and was buried, and rose again for us, thy Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen. MERE KNOWLEDGE NOT RELIGION. CHAPTER VIII. There is one common mistake into which many of us fall, and against which it is impossible to guard with too much caution, viz., that of mistaking religious knowledge for religion. No man can have been con- versant with what is called the religious world, without having seen that the religious world is a portion of this world, and not of the next. To say nothing of those who are unconnected with the Established Church, we ourselves are unfortunately divided into so many parties that there are even in the Church a variety of religious worlds. The world to each individual Christian is the little circle in which we happen to be placed ; and in every such circle their is much of worldly feeling and temper which will mix itself up, even with that which ought to be most holy ; and the more knowledge and clearness of view which the Almighty has granted to us, the more danger there is that we shall look down on others who do not appear to us to possess these advantages. There is hardly any one who has felt much on religion, whose eye is not fixed, more or less exclusively, on some one particular point. This man has seen the evil of high doctrines accompanied by low practice, and he views religion in no other light than as the doing the will of God. He forgets those sancti- fying and consoling truths which have led him to wish to do the will of God ; he forgets that which induced him to fly to Christ and to holiness. When then he MERE KNOWLEDGE NOT RELIGION. 89 perceives another Christian whose circumstances have led him to regard the question under a different aspect — whose maxim it is, that if we believe rightly, the fruits of good living will necessarily arise out of a pure faith — he is apt to thank God that he is not as other men are. Both may be partly right and partly wrong. Yet it is not the knowledge, but the being in a state of holy submission to the law of Christ, and of active exertion in the cause of Christ, which makes us Christ’s soldiers and servants. The observation of St. James is, “ If any man among you seem to be reli- gious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man’s religion is vain.” The Christian of the present day to whom God hath granted a larger portion of knowledge on religious subjects, is, alas, often rendered ostentatiously dictatorial by the very know- ledge which puffeth up rather than edifieth. Know- ledge is, alas, often the means of taking off the bridle from our tongue. His views may be correct, clear, and scriptural, and the knowing that they are so, may have deceived him into a speaking of others in such a way as he would not have spoken, had his tongue been bridled by Christian charity. It is St. James who says, that “ this man’s religion is vain.” It leads not to that holiness, that meek child-like humility to which it was destined to have led its owner. True religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this.”* The way to worship and to serve God is, “ To visit the * The word here translated religion is dQr](jyJia (i. 27.) It means service of God : worship of God : that which an inferior would pay to a superior. 8 90 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.” To perform acts of mercy and kindness to our fellow creatures, and to abstain from those tempers and those acts which will hinder that holiness which God in mercy would estab- lish in our hearts through his Holy Spirit. Now though knowledge will in many ways contribute to the spiritual advancement of the Christian ; though knowledge be a great gift, a gift for which we shall be called to a strict account, yet God forbid that we should mistake know- ledge for the whole of the service of God, or for the chief part of Christianity. No man can estimate too highly the immense blessing of possessing correct views on topics connected with this most important subject, but a religion which confines itself to opinions, however sound, may and will prove vain. Faith and devotion are much more closely joined together, than the inactive Christian is willing to confess, or to believe ; and many a pains-taking busy Christian finds it no easy task to learn how much more devotion has to do with the heart than the hand. The one would be contented with keeping himself unspotted from the world. The other would willingly visit the widow and the father- less. Both would serve God — but each would select a task best suited to his own feelings, and both would conceal the truth from their own eyes, that the one is as requisite as the other. Active duties foster and pro- mote holiness, and holiness is the only root from which Christian activity can spring up to any advantage. If we would be Christians in reality, as well as name, we must be devoted, given up to the service of God. We must seek the one thing needful. MERE KNOWLEDGE NOT RELIGION. 91 The close connection here spoken of as existing between knowledge and practice, is by no means con- fined to religious subjects. It may be questioned whether any many can properly be said to know any thing which he does not put in practice ; at least it may be safely contended that if he act in opposition to such supposed knowledge, he does clearly prove that he does not know — is not really convinced. Supposing I heard an agriculturist expressing a very strong opinion with regard to a new system of cultivating a particular species of soil — I saw that he spoke with earnestness on the point — I knew him to be a sincere man — open — candid — but I found on enquiry that his own fields were managed on the old plan, and that whatever might be the conviction on his mind, it extended no further than his mind — it was never carried out in practice. With this evidence before me, could I help doubting whether he were convinced ? and if forced to pass a judgment, must I not say that I did not believe that he was convinced ? I should say that the man did not believe or know that the new system was the best system — that he was not persuaded of it — for that if he had been so, he must have acted on his persuasion. That he cannot hiow unless he do — not merely that he will not understand the truth, unless he practise it, (which I believe to be true,) but that no man can be said to know any thing in the strict sense of the word, which he has not practically tried — knowing and doing are so joined together, in the nature of things, by God — that as we cannot do unless we know — so neither can we know, unless we do. 92 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? In a question so important as Christianity, so import- ant as everything must be which concerns our eternal state, it is positively sinful to remain in willing igno- rance. The servant who knew his master’s will, and did it not, shall be beaten with many stripes — but the servant who might have known his master’s will, and knew it not, is perhaps more guilty ; for it is the duty of every created being to try to know what the will of the Lord is ; and thanks be to Almighty God, it is in England the fault of those who do not know the will of the Lord. It cannot be pretended that enough is done in England for the spiritual instruction of the people. As a nation we are perhaps more guilty in this particular than in any other — ^but in England no man can be so placed, as not to be able to learn what the will of the Lord is, if he be anxious to obtain this best of knowledge. This Christian country abounds in ignorance and infidelity — but the day of judgment will convict those who are either ignorant or unbeliev- ers, of a great sin, in not having employed those means which were placed by God within their reach. The individual who is ignorant of the way of the Lord, and does not try to learn it, is guilty of being careless about his salvation. Now though all ignorance on these subjects is criminal, yet the study of religious subjects does not always lead to religion. Ignorance is criminal as far as it is voluntary — but there is a way of trying to obtain knowledge on religious matters which is equally dangerous. It is hardly necessary to point out the guilt of those who seek knowledge without any desire MERE KNOWLEDGE NOT RELIGION. 93 to fulfil the will of the Lord, but to seek it in a con- tentious temper will equally obstruct the prospect of obtaining spiritual improvement from it. Controversy does in the end probably lead to truth — but it fre- quently happens that it does not tend to produce religion. Men may carry on discussions on religious subjects so as to benefit both parties — ^but they rarely do so. If they carry them on with prayer to God, and an humble seeking of the truth, there may be great hope that they will become wiser unto salvation — but this 4S not the spirit with which such disputes are usually carried on. We show more anxiety to estab- lish our own position, than to discover the truth. In such discussions we are apt to mistake the whole nature of a revelation from God. Revelation is a gift from God to man, and not a discovery of man. No man ever found it out for himself. Man would never have discovered it, but God made it known to him. I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes.” And they only who have become little children in Christ Jesus are in that state which renders us fit and ready to receive the great truths of revelation — not to dis- cover but to receive. All things are delivered unto me of my Father, and no man knoweth the Son but the Father, neither knoweth any man the Father save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him” — No man can come unto me except the Father which hath sent me draw him.” There is something besides the mere knowledge. 94 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? There must be a knowledge ; but there is something which the man cannot provide for himself. There is a heavenly aid. No man can know God except it be revealed to him from above. The Son must teach us to know the Father, he must draw our hearts to the Father. The understanding is concerned, but there is something beyond the understanding. We cannot receive that which, in one sense, we do not understand ; we must understand what is meant, and we must know that it comes from God ; we must so far comprehend the nature of every declaration, that we may see what practical influence it ought to have on us. But the accepting of revealed truth depends more on the heart than on the understanding. In religious matters, men refuse their assent to that which they do not fully comprehend, not because the doing so is reasonable, but because they themselves are proud. Their hearts are lifted up with the idea of their own importance, and they will not come unto Christ to be saved, be- cause the so coming is humiliating to their feelings. The first doctrine which such persons reject, is that of original sin. They will not confess that we are by nature very far gone from original righteousness. We do not understand, say they, how God can account us sinners, because Adam sinned ! And while men con- tinue in this frame of mind, it is not wonderful that they should not see the mere}’' of that scheme in which we are justified from our many offences, by the death of our Saviour, and the free gift of God. The question which such persons ought to examine, is not how God does so — not why God does so — but whether he does MERE KNOWLEDGE NOT RELIGION. 95 SO. The real point, at which a wise man would look, is not why man should be very far gone from original righteousness, but whether he is so. Whether we are very far from that state in which we must be, before we can be admitted into the presence of a God of holiness ; and this is a point which we can only learn by the revelation of God’s will, and by fatal experience. Look at the law of God — see what he commands in the Bible — what he commands for instance in the sermon on the mount, and then say whether the natural temper of our own minds be in conformity with this, “ Blessed are the poor in spirit — blessed are they that mourn and say whether this be the temper of the world — whether the world does consider the poor in spirit,” or “the mourner” blessed. This is a matter of fact, which any one may know, that the mass of the world would smile at the idea of calling these two classes of persons happy — blessed — blessed in this life as well as the next. The Christian who is practically acquainted with the state of the world, believes these declarations to be strictly true : viz., that the man who is meek, who is poor in spirit, is much more happy and contented in this life, than the man who is always contentiously striving and struggling for his own rights. That he has a greater share of enjoy- ment from worldly goods. The Christian believes, that as to real happiness, the man who mourns^ who meets with what the world calls misfortunes, and who receives them as coming from the Lord, is in a much more happy state than the man who seems always pros- perous. We must understand this, in order to believe 96 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? it. We must know it, in order to receive it; but there is something more required than the mere assenting to the declaration. David, when he was in the midst of his prosperity, desired to obtain his neighbour’s wife, and in order to do so, he formed a treacherous plan of murdering the husband. All this succeeded to the utmost of his wishes. Uriah was slain by the hands of the enemy, and the sinful wife yielded a ready obedi- ence to his adulterous commands. In all this was David happy, blessed } Then God sent the Prophet to reprove him, and he confessed his sin ; he exclaimed in heartfelt penitence, I have sinned against the Lord. Upon this the prophet answered. And the Lord hath put away thy sin. Now, in which of these two cases did David enjoy the most real happiness ? No doubt when he was mourning. If it were objected that the case is not a fair one, since every sinful joy must lead to misery, it must be considered, that the question at issue, is the opinion of the world. Whether mankind in general do not consider him, who is going on suc- cessfully in a course of sin, a more happy man, than if in the bitterness of his grief he confessed that he had offended a good and gracious God ; no doubt the hour of sincere penitence is the happiest hour, but will the world think so We will take another example. Alexander the Great was perhaps the most successful conqueror of antiquity ; he carried his victorious arms over countries of which he scarcely knew the names, when he began his career of triumphs ; and with which we have only lately become acquainted by the exten- sion of our East India possessions. Nation after MERE KNOWLEDGE NOT RELIGION. 97 nation yielded to his skill and the discipline of his troops ; and he was able to subdue all things, except himself. To whom shall we compare him To a prisoner who sat in pain, in hunger, and in darkness, whose feet were made fast in the stocks, and his back torn with scourges. St. Paul was brought into this condition, because he had tried to preach the Gospel to these very persons, whose enmity was excited by his attempt to benefit them in the most important of all ways ; and he was employed during this hour in singing praises to that God who had thought him worthy thus to suffer for the cause of truth. Let any reasonable man say, whether he would rather have been Alexander or St. Paul. Every one must, I conceive, see what is meant by the declaration, blessed are they that mourn but who can say that he knows this, unless he has felt the blessed effect of religious sorrow in his own heart } Most men would prefer the condition of Socrates to that of his accusers — would rather have been Charles I. than those who condemned him. But we can hardly say that we know this, unless we have denied ourselves, and taken up the cross and followed Christ. The bare assent of the mind to the truths of revelation is not enough ; we must live as if that which we believe were true. In science, when a new truth is discovered, every scientific man will adopt it, and act upon it. In reli- gion it is not so ; many who know the truth do not act upon it. These things are written that ye might 9 98 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? believe, that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God, and that believing ye might have life through his name.” The mere revelation, the being written, is not enough, ye must believe in order to have life through his name. So again, If any man will do his will, he shall know of this doctrine, whether it be of God he cannot know unless he do. No man will be, or can be practically a believer, unless he do the will of God. And we must remember that what is here spoken of, is not a human invention, but a revelation from above ; a revelation accepted by man through the influence of the Holy Ghost, and carried out into a life of holiness. O Lord, we beseech Thee mercifully to receive the prayers of thy people which call upon Thee ; and grant that they may both perceive and know what things they ought to do, and also may have grace and power faithfully to fulfil the same : through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING BACK. ’Twas dreadful, when the accuser’s power Assail’d my sinking heart, Recounting every wasted hour. And each unworthy part. But, Jesu ! in that mortal fray Thy blessed comfort stole, Like sunshine in a stormy day. Across my darken’d soul. When soon or late, this feeble breath. No more to Thee shall pray. Support me through the vale of death. And in the darksome way. When clothed in fleshly weeds again, I wait Thy dread decree. Judge of the world ! bethink Thee then. That Thou hast died for me. THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING BACK. CHAPTER IX. We have seen, in the last chapter, that mere knowledge of religion is not religion ; but the knowledge of what is right and wrong is an element which must enter materially into the question of our own guilt. Every one who would compare his past life with the purity of the Gospel, would be sure to condemn himself ; but he who might have known the purity of the Gospel, and who dies in ignorance of it, must be equally guilty, and will never be led to confess his sin, and to seek for pardon. They who are anxious to celebrate and extol the mercies of God’s sovereign grace, in the special calls to repentance, by which some favoured individuals have been led to seek for pardon through a crucified Saviour, are very apt to overlook the general mercy of that God, who willeth all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth. They overlook the blessing of having been born and bred up in a Christian land, where the true light shineth. They overlook the guilt of not knowing the truth. They see that God allows a judicial blindness to fall on those who have eyes and see not, but they do not consider that, as far as man can judge on such a question, they who are thus punished, have incurred the guilt expressed by the words,* Their eyes have they closed.” There can be little doubt that the great mass of a J latt. xiii. 15 (ixdiLtfujaav.) 9 * 102 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? people, nominally Christian, are living in a state far from what it ought to be. That they are not in the road to heaven. There are those who are living in acknowledged sin. There are the careless. There are those who wish for heaven, but are not striving to obtain it ; and in all these cases, it is probable that the want of the knowledge of what is right, enters largely into the cause which have led to their being in the wrong path. And perhaps no one thing would contribute so much to the discovery of the truth, with regard to ourselves, as the careful retrospect of our past lives. As two friends were one day talking of the state of the world around them, it was observed by the younger, that they had hardly ever known a strictly honest man. I am surprised at this, said the other, for I should have said, that in our own rank of life, I have hardly ever known one whom I should designate as dishonest. These persons were not so far apart in their general sentiments, as might have been expected from such opposite declarations ; but they regarded the word dis- honest in a different light. The one considered dis- honesty to consist in doing that which the laws of the land would punish — the other had established a high standard in his own mind, and would have applied, perhaps uncharitably, the term dishonest to those who did not act up to this measure of honesty. But even without the establishing of a very high standard, the position is much nearer the truth than most of us should at first allow. Money transactions are more tangible criterions of right and wrong than any others, because the money value enables the party aggrieved. THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING BACK. 103 to place before those who have injured him, much more definite evidence of the injury. And perhaps there is no class of duties which are so well understood, and so distinctly laid down and acknowledged as those per- taining to pounds, shillings, and pence. Observations when made on money matters will be more easily understood, than if the same reasoning were applied to other subject-matter. In looking, then, at our own money transactions, how few of us are, strictly speak- ing, honest ; that is, how few of us would do that, when we are not likely to be seen, which we should do if our conduct were placed before the eyes of the world. How many persons would do that as members of a body corporate, which they would be utterly ashamed to do if they were acting alone. How many persons, where they are not known, would do that, about little things, w’hich they would never have thought of doing in their own neighbourhood. People may call this ‘‘ mean,’’ rather than dishonest, and perhaps the word would be more appropriate, but the question before us, is not about names, but things. There is a certain credit attached to the making a good bargain, which is very seductive. Many a man who would be ashamed to do that to a poor man, which would in any way injure him, will still be very hard with a workman when he is entering into a contract with him, and will be severe in exacting what has been agreed on. In England, he who charged more for work, when done, than he would have agreed to do it for, if previously asked, would be considered an unfair workman. Many per- sons would be guilty of this, and perhaps as a general 104 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? rule, we should advise a young housekeeper always to make an agreement before he entered on any work, in which he possessed no great experience ; but still, a tradesman who charged that which he would not have charged if he had been previously asked the question, would be sure to meet with the reprobation of his neighbours, who would blame him, though they them- selves might be guilty of the same species of fraud. In Holland, it used to be the custom to travel by boats on the canals in which the fare is fixed and small ; but there are frequent carryings of luggage from one boat to another, which render this species of journey much more expensive than it would otherwise be. If a stranger accept of the offices of the first porter who presents himself, and make no bargain as to the conveyance of his goods, he will invariably be much imposed on, and should he be so unwise as to go to a magistrate, the only question which will be asked him is. Did you make any agreement ? if not, you had better pay what is asked. What ! more than double what any porter would have gladly done it for ? Yes, sir I It is difficult to ascertain the value of such work ; whereas, almost any porter would have named a fair price, had he been originally asked, and would have done his work with fidelity. The same man will be strictly scrupulous about the delivery of the goods, and will charge for their conveyance, three times as much as he would have undertaken to do it for, and will be esteemed honest. The question which we should ask ourselves is this — are there not many of us who are guilty of the same THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING BACK. 105 inconsistency ? I believe that if any man will review his own money transactions for a year, review what he has done, and what he has not done, about pounds, shillings, and pence, he will find his own conduct, much nearer to some of these cases, than he supposes. But there is another way of looking at the matter. Every one has some standard of right and wrong, by which he ostensibly measures his conduct. The gam- bler has one. The horse dealer has another. The retail tradesman has a third. The stockbroker follows a fourth, and without venturing to enumerate all the specific standards which we might find in the world, it may seem probable that every individual will differ in his standard, not only according to the subject matter on which he deals, but as to his interpretation of the law by which he supposes that he regulates himself. The same man might act very differently if he were settling the proportions to be paid after a contested election — or letting a farm — or selling a horse — and two neighbouring country gentlemen might vary considerably as to the way in which they would settle each of these points. Benevolus would be shocked at the idea of not paying his full share of the bills, though he never approved of the putting forward of the candidate — but Benevolus was a hard landlord, and no one would deal v/ith him about a horse. Eugenius never sold a pony without telling all its faults — was kind and liberal to his tenants — but it was no easy matter to induce him to pay his pro- portion of the expenses of the contested election, which 106 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? he had excited against the better judgment of those who took the same view in politics. Each of us have our own standard on each subject on which we have to act. Taking then your own standard — have you always acted up to that standard } Has the horse dealer never done that which he would rather conceal from a brother in the craft ? A bishop had preferment in his gift, part of which belonged to him as bishop, and part arose from his holding another office together with his bishoprick. He thought himself bound to give away the preferment which belonged to the bishoprick to the fittest man he could find in his diocese. He gave away a living, which was connected with the other source, to a relation whom he did not consider as eligible — and when a remonstrance was made, his answer was. This is my own — it does not belong to the bishoprick. God forbid that we should judge any one harshly — Judge ye yourselves, brethren, that ye be not judged of the Lord — ^but such instances will convince any one, who is open to conviction, how few of us really try to please God. Our morality is an earthly morality. Nor should it ever be forgotten that the standard which we have established for our- selves is not accidental. Tell me with whom you go, and I will tell you what you do. Our places in society, and our duties are to a certain degree imposed on us — and there may be a standard to which we were born — but good men will contribute to raise the standard of those among whom they live, and others will lower it. He who has been guilty of three acts of meanness, will find less compunction when he per- THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING BACK. 107 forms the fourth. There is such a thing as raising or lowering the honour among thieves. It is the combination of all these considerations, which renders it so impossible for one human being to judge of another. A poor boy who was born and bred a thief — who had never known any other occupation, scrupled to steal a prayer book from a church, because God would see him. A clergyman misapplied money which had been collected for charitable purposes, and would not allow that it was stealing to do so. Who shall judge another ? But who can look back upon his own past life, and not tremble for himself.^ not ex- claim, “ God be merciful to me a sinner No two persons have possessed the same advantages. No one can tell what advantages others may have possessed. And we all forget those which we have neglected or rejected. Let any humble Christian look back upon his own life, and try to estimate the number of advan- tages of which he has made no use. Many persons draw a broad line of distinction between their conduct before and after some special impressions made on their own minds with regard to religion. Before a certain day they seem to regard themselves as heathen — and they would apparently argue that all their sins committed before that time wef'e not committed against light and knowledge. Of course in a certain sense this is true. They did not then see things as they do now — but why did they not ? Is not the very fact that they closed their eyes against light, which God placed before them, a great proof of their very guilt. They closed their eyes 106 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? against advantages which many prophets and kings have desired. Is this no sin ? A pious mother (for we owe more to our mothers than any one will believe) had laboured hard, and prayed constantly, that she might bring up all her children as the servants of Christ — and God had crowned her prayers and exer- tions with much apparent success. One of the elder boys had been sent to a public school, and had led the life which many a boy there leads — he had been laughed out of his habits of praying, much against his will ; but when he had ceased to depend on God’s help, his downward course was rapid, and he had reached the head of the school, with an excellent character, but with utter carelessness as to^the state of his own soul. His younger brother was now sent to the same school, and on the night of his arrival knelt down to say his prayers, expecting of course that his brother, to whom he justly looked up in most respects, would have joined him in a custom which had been invariably observed at home — perhaps the elder brother might have done so, but there were other boys in the room, and he gave the poor child a severe box on the ear, and called him a little Methodist. Was the guilt of this elder brother the guilt of a heathen ? It shocked the feelings of a youth who had never been taught to think of religion, and had the effect of making him consider that atten- tively, which he had never regarded before in any other way than that of ridicule. He would have laughed at the child, but when the child was persecuted for righteousness’ sake, even he who was a stranger to piety himself, could not but see the beauty of it in THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING BACK. 109 another, and the baseness of the elder brother. The idea which crossed his mind was this. This child has obviousl}^ a superiority over both of us, who are much his superiors in age and station in the school. He is not afraid of showing that he fears God more than man. If I did so, if I feared God, I do not know that I should have courage enough to show it, and here is a brother — who must have had the same advantages at home, who is so looked up to in the school, that no one would venture even to ridicule him if he acted religiously — here is he, who allows all the kind feel- ings of a brother to be stifled, merely because some of us are standing by, who are conscious of his ordinary disregard of what he must consider right. I am bad enough, but how guilty is this elder brother. The feeling which crossed the mind of this boy, was that which arose in the Saviour of the world when he said. Woe unto thee Bethsaida, woe unto the Chorazin.” The friend was acquainted with the domestic history of the brothers — he knew the habits of the house — he knew how religious ordinances were there observed — > how the children were not only instructed in the truths of Christianity, and taught the outside of religion, but how obedience was the law of the house — how God was honoured by the lives of the parents, how those parents laboured in prayer and in practice to lead their offspring to heaven, through the paths of holiness. The friend knew all this, and he said within himself — for he himself belonged to a fashionable household where religion was utterly neglected — he said within himself, if God had blessed me, as I know he has 10 110 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? blessed these brothers, with all the Christian knowledge which they possess, nothing could have led me to act in this brutal way — his thought was correct, but he was mistaken as to the fact. There is no lowness in the scale of moral degradation to which any of us may not fall, if we cast off the light which is in us. What baseness is there that a man may not be guilty of, who is deeply involved in debt } And if it were not for the restraints of society, how far may not any one have fallen, who has given up the guidance of religion.^ If God had enabled any of us to carry into effect every evil thought which has passed through our minds — what would have been the state of our hearts now ? David’s station enabled him to put his wicked thoughts into execution. Herod’s authority enabled Herodias to satisfy her vengeance against St. John. If we had been enabled so to do — wdiat would have been our state even now ? The Church of Rome has done a great injury to morality by the use of the word venial sins. There are sins, negligences, and ignorances. There are pre- sumptuous sins, and sins of weakness. There are some sins worse than others. But whoever establishes a line of demarcation between sins, lays down that, of which no man can be a judge. There are two stan- dards by which we may properly try to estimate guilt ; by the injury done to others, and by the depravity of the agent. The first refers to the effect produced on man ; the second must depend on the state of the agent, or the advantages which he has neglected. An old gentleman used to say, My brother, (his THK CHRISTIAN LOOKING RACK. Ill brother held an office of dignity and emoluments in the Church,) my brother is much worse than I am — he is not a bit better than I am — and he is paid for being religious. There was some truth in this. The vices of a dig- nified clergyman would do more harm than those of a profligate country gentleman. And the old man in question saw this — he was in the habit of estimating, correctly, the faults of every clergyman in the neigh- bourhood, and gloried in them. Poor man ! ! The condemned criminal might well pity such a wreck of a moral being : but this man had brought himself into this state, by neglecting known duties and known means of grace. Compare the guilt of any of these with that of a clergyman, of high professions, who defrauded a charitable institution. Look at him, if still denying his guilt, or if convinced and mourning for his conduct ! ! Ten young men at College passed a night together in riot and debauchery — one was the son of a profes- sional man in London, who had no idea beyond that of eat and drink, for to-morrow we die.” The second was the son of a pious widow, who had straitened herself, and deprived herself of every comfort to which she had been accustomed, in order to give her son an education, and to place him in the same station in life which had been occupied by his late father. The third was the son of a clergyman, who, till the age of eigh- teen, had been educated by an excellent father at home, and had been kept free from every taint of vice. Why need I go on } There are ten cases, every one of m WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? which is totally different. What man can judge of such cases ? Who can estimate the relative guilt of such persons ? Penitens had lived, as many a man does in London, without a serious thought on religion, till he was married ; his wife was not religious, but belonged to a decent respectable family, and on the first Sunday after their return from their wedding tour, they went to church. He had occasionally taken the trouble to go and hear a popular preacher — was a very fair judge of the rules of Christian eloquence — despised ranting and mannerism ; and was fully sensible of the influence of simple earnestness, and particularly admired it, when it was combined with the ornaments of correct diction, vivid illustration, and poetic thoughts ; but he had never thought of a sermon as a means of saving a sinner from the error of his ways, and leading a soul to Christ. It so happened that their parish church was well warmed, and frequented by many respectable families in their own rank of life, that it was the fashion of the neighbourhood to approve of the way in which the service was conducted. They thought it proper to have a seat of their own, and obtained one, with as much reference to the salvation of their souls, as might have attended the contract which he made for his carriage. Thus circumstanced, they began the habit of going to church. Their attendance was irregular at first — it became more constant after a time — they were seen at the altar before two years were over ; and at the end of five, Penitens was the intimate friend of the old vicar, and the curates were frequent visitants at his house THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING BACK. 113 He was one day stating to an old friend of his father’s, in the City, the comforts, particularly the religious comforts, he enjoyed. Why, said the old man, you alwa3"s were a good sort of fellow, and when you had sown your wild oats, and were married and steadied, you began to enjoy the advantages of your hard work and honesty of heart. Young men will be young men, but you were always one whom I liked, and could make excuses for, and you are now reaping the reward of it. Penitens felt very differently, but he perceived the inutility of arguing with one who saw so little of the reality of things ; and with his mind full of these thoughts he retired to his closet. In this frame of mind he began the retrospect of his past life. Twenty years agone, I was, as to gross and presumptuous sin, innocent. There was no strong impression of religion on my mind, but I had been taught to know the truth, and I knew the theory of Christianity. I knew that my only hopes of pardon were through a crucified Redeemer ; my only hopes of growing in grace, or walking in the commandments of the Lord blameless, consisted in the influence which the Holy Ghost should exercise on my will and my conduct. That faith would make me a partaker of the one, and that if I desired to become a sharer in the other, I must employ those means which God had appointed. How did I make use of this knowledge } I fell into evil society. I learnt evil thoughts, and I delighted in them, and loved to let my mind roam on the verge of evil, long before I launched into the sea of iniquity. Evil thoughts unre- 10 * 114 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? strained, brought on evil words, and evil words produced evil deeds. None of these steps cost me much com- punction of mind. There was a consciousness that I was doing wrong, and when I first acted very much against my previous habits and convictions, there was a great struggle in my own mind. A frequent wretched- ness when I ventured to think of what I was doing ; but this soon went off. I kept up for some time a semblance of propriety, but this vanished after a time, and left me reckless and rejoicing in iniquity. When my circumstances enabled me to keep up an establish- ment, I married, and determined to be faithful in one relation of life at least, and we went to church, and without being able to say, that any one preacher, or any one sermon, produced an}^ very striking effect on me, I am what I am. good friend thinks me justly rewarded for my virtue ; he sees that I am happy and blessed, but he little estimates the feelings with which these blessings fill my heart. I have every outward comfort. I have a peaceful hope that my sins are par- doned. I heartily thank God for all that he has done for me ; but what are the feelings with which that thankfulness fills my soul ? Here am I, for ten years of my life, the best, the most active, the years in which my character was formed most fully. I rejected God, and served the world, the flesh, and the devil. I had been signed and sealed as the soldier and servant of Christ, and m3" service was devoted to the enemy of Christ. I knew the means by v/hich I might advance in holiness, and I rejected and neglected every one of them. I never prayed, and I never received the Lord’s . THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING BACK. 115 Supper. I often felt compunctions of conscience ; God was pleased again and again to touch me with the sense of m3” guilt. I knew the means of escape — I knew how good our heavenly^ Father is — the value of our Saviour’s blood — the freeness of the gift of the Spirit of God, but I rejected all. My sins were, during this time, many and great, but my great sin was, that time after time, I rejected those mercies of God which would have led me to repentance. If God had cut me off during these ten years ! ! Ah, who can dwell with everlasting burnings } And then I look upon the companions of my guilt — those whom I corrupted — those whom I hardened in sin — some were taken to a speedy vengeance. I was spared, yet I went on in my impenitence. There was one of our loose companions who had turned over a new leaf, and was apparently reformed, and we over-persuaded him once more to join in our vile enjoyments, and in the hour of sin, he perished. He, the poor victim, perished ; we, the advisers, survived his death, and yet repented not. Where are they all gone ? And yet I live to partake of mercy and comfort — 3^es, comfort ! ! Blessed are they that mourn. And what have been the means which have wrought out all this for me ? I attended church from a sense of propriety ; to appear to be what I was not, to my wife and servants. And God has been pleased, in five years, to change me from a vile sinner to a humble penitent. I have learnt to smite upon my breast. The service of the church, and the simple truths which I heard repeated from the pulpit, rekindled first those latent sparks, which ten years of 116 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? carelessness had not been able to quench. God thus raised up the will — he gave me grace to use the means. I mourned, I prayed, and used the ordinances of the church, as God’s appointments. I tried to assist God’s ministers in the work of the Lord, and without knowing that I have been able to do any good to others, I know that these means have done good to me. Thank God, I am what lam. It is but a mournful thought to con- sider what I might have been, had I been other than I have. I say nothing of others, now perhaps in hell by my instrumentality. God forgive me — Lord have mercy upon us — Christ have mercy upon us — Lord have mercy upon us ; but when evil passions, evil tem- pers, evil thoughts arise, I say this is the just punish- ment of ten years spent in the service of the devil. How different might I have been, had I served God in those years. But thank God, I am what I am, and he knelt down and wept and prayed. Eusebius was now drawing to the close of life, and as his custom was, he was passing the evening before the celebration of the Lord’s Supper, in private self- examination and prayer. He had spent his life in the service of his Saviour ; he had entered early into the ministry — had been employed in many various places, and had justly obtained the character of a faithful ser- vant of the church. He had always been a very devoted and active clergyman, and God had blessed him in worldly prosperity beyond his expectations. The world called him a happy man, and in the general acceptation of the term, he was so ; but he was too well acquainted with the law of God, and its purity, to be ignorant of THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING BACK. 117 his own real state, and he had violated the law of the Most High, too often not to experience the miserable consequences of disobedience, and to be aware of his guilt. The world called him a holy man ; but he knew too well the actual import of the word, to esteem him- self holy. He felt that he was a sinner, and he felt that, however heinous the open transgressions of others might appear to men, there was that in his having offended, which made his guilt much greater in the sight of God. He thought of the mercies with which his path had been strewed ; but he remembered the use to which these were all destined by Heaven, and he could not help feeling, that if others had been favoured as he had been, they might have proved much more faithful stewards, than he had ever done. He thought of the actual sins of which he had been guilty, and they were more in number than the hairs of his head. I have sinned, said he, against light and knowledge. I have done wrong against the suggestions of my con- science, and against the admonitions of the Holy Spirit. God placed before me the true road to happiness, and how often did I turn aside into some bye path of secret indulgence. My very offices made me to partake of every means of grace ; my personal habits prevented me from partaking in the grace, which those means were destined to impart. How often have I resisted the Spirit of God, and what must I fairly say of all those qualities which others admire in me ; they are, not only the gift of God, but they have been forced upon me, to speak the truth, by my outward circum- stances in life, and they are no further my own, than 118 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? as I have made them mine, by the evils which I mixed up with them, and by my imperfections with which I have stained them. It is true, that as a boy at school, I al ways ranked myself on the side of religion ; but this arose more from the character of my father, who was well known in the neighbourhood ; and as a son, I was ashamed to disgrace the professions of such a father. It was a blessing of God, visited on the first generation of one, who had kept his commandments. A character so established at school, was not easily lost at college ; and as my prospects of academical distinction kept me in the path of propriety and good conduct, the outward appearance of devotion was maintained without any great sacrifice. I am fully sensible of the blessing, the advantage of having been preserved from those excesses into which many of my companions fell ; but it was God’s outward mercy which preserved me from external evil, rather than that his grace was working on a heart, which was even then contaminated with much which was contrary to the precepts of our heavenly King. I am fully sensible of the advantage, but I know where all the praise is due, for I cannot but look back to those hours, in which others esteemed me religious, though I was by no means devoted to God, I was indulging in many evil habits of mind — wilfully — con- stantly — I was outwardly God’s servant, but I was not then a faithful servant, not in the lowest sense. I did not even wish to serve God faithfully. Evil habits of mind are not easily kept within the boundaries of the mind ; they soon show forth themselves in evil acts, and one who continues outwardly to serve God, who THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING BACK. 119 in some respects does serve God with zeal and activity, may still be falling into habits which shall make him know more harm of himself, then of any soul on earth. It was these habits which stood between me and advancement in holiness. God, I trust, never cast me off. I trust that I never cast off God ; that I should always have laid down my life in the cause of Chris- tianity ; but I did not lay down my prejudices, I did not lay down my evil tempers, nor my unholy habits ; and they constantly stood between me and my Christian advancement in holiness. The thought which now comes across me, and fills me with sorrow and dismay, is this : Christ, in his mercy, has called me to pardon and to peace — I have long accepted his gracious offer, closed with the terms of mercy, not merely in the formal act of his blessed sacrament of Baptism, but by the joyful devotion of half a century. I have uniformly been made acquainted with the means by which I might grow in grace, and have in some degree used those means ; but how far below what I might have been in Christian holiness have I fallen, through my own wilful disobedience. If I had been as constant in private prayer, as earnest in my closet, as I was regular in my outward duties, how should I have escaped those temp- tations, through which I have fallen, and been supported by a grace, which would, if asked for, have been vouch- safed. If my devotional study of the Bible had been as strenuously pursued, as the preparation for exhibiting myself in public as the minister of the sanctuary, my knowledge of the Word of God would have proved no less critically valuable, and it would have made me a 120 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? more efficient expounder of the book of life, when I needed its assistance to guide myself, or to instruct my flock. If I had made use of the means of holiness and usefulness which God put into my hands, how different a man should I now have been. God in his mercy never cast me off : and as he wiped away the falling tear, he added, and he never will cast me off. But that is owing to his mercy, and not to any thing of mine. He gave me the means to have become as it were an angel on earth, and alas ! alas ! I am but a poor, weak, guilty sinner. Almighty and everlasting God, who hatest nothing that thou hast made, and dost forgive the sins of all them that are penitent ; create and make in us new and contrite hearts, that we, worthily lamenting our sins, and acknowledging our wretchedness, ma}^ obtain of thee, the God of all mercy, perfect remission and forgiveness ; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. MY GRACE IS SUFFICIENT FOR THEE. Sweet word of promise, be thou near To comfort and refresh my soul, When’er the dark’ning shades of fear. Across faith’s cheering landscape roll. When memory tells her fearful train. Of vows inscribed in fleeting sand, Of weak resolves and purpose frail, Be thou, blest comforter, at hand. Speak thou of all-prevailing prayer, Sure title to celestial aid. Of Him who will the contrite spare. Of hope, on One that’s mighty laid. The soul most humbled for its guilt. Most self-abased, and self-abhorred. May yet be strong, where strength is built Upon the promise of the Lord. THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. CHAPTER X. It is often curious to observe, how the same general premises, will lead minds differently constituted, to conclusions diametrically opposite to each other. After having read what goes before, one man might rightly say, “ It all depends on the grace of God and another might express himself, in sorrow, by declaring How all has depended on myself and this in a great measure, according to the state of the individual. If he be in the way to heaven, he sees clearly, that it is only God’s grace and mercy which is guiding him there. If his footsteps be in the path to hell, it is his own per- verseness which is the cause of his ruin. God would have saved him. God has placed the path of peace before him, the offer of pardon, and the means of grace ; but he has neglected both — he has rejected both. When therefore the sincere Christain looks forward to his future life, and endeavours to trace a course which shall end in everlasting hapiness, he will, according to the previous circumstances which have retarded him in his heavenward journey, frame to himself plans and regulations which shall obviate what has before hindered him in running the race which is set before him. These hindrances may be divided into two heads : the neglect of means, and the trusting in means. He who neglects means which God has appointed, will have no right to 124 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? complain if he obtained not the grace which those means were destined to confer. He who trusts in the means, trusts in an arm of flesh. Eubulus was gifted by nature with every superior talents ; he was blessed with a strong feeling of religion, and was in most of the circumstances of life a man to whom a friend might point as an example worthy of the love and admiration of his fellow creatures. His misfortune was, that his appetite was strong ; and his fault was, that he had indulged this craving of his stomach, till his animal desires had mastered his pru- dence, and got the better of his sense of Christian self- denial. His punishment was, that he suffered much bodily distress for many years — that his Christain use- fulness was greatly diminished, he was sore let and hindered in running the race which was set before him. Had Eubulus learnt early in life that this sort goeth not out, but by prayer and fasting,” how different might have been his course. Now if Eubulus at the age of fifty were reading these pages, and determined to frame for himself a plan, by which he might walk forward towards eternal joy, he might see that his safety must depend on the adoption of wise regulations with regard to his body ; and on the grace of God, which should enable him to carry out these plans, and grant a blessing upon them. He would determine by fasting, not to expiate his former gluttony, but to create a habit of self-restraint, from the want of which he had again and again fallen. Such a man, on looking back, would probably remember many occasions on which he had made resolutions of the same descrip- THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. 125 tion, but his determination had vanished into empty- air, and brought forth no visible effect. This seed w^as sown on stony ground, and when the sun arose — when he was forced to give up that which he had loved, and which had by self-indulgence acquired a power over him, the blade of good resolutions withered, and came to nothing. Perhaps it is hard to state the cause of the failure of Euhulus. He knew what was needed — he had from time to time tried to adopt the means which would have led him right. Does he dare say that God did not give him the power of self-denial ? That he could not have gone on ? He did not, and herein is his guilt. It might have happened that his eyes were blinded as to the cause of his self-corruption. No doubt flesh and blood would have resisted the adoption of any strict system of abstinence ; but he could hardly have blinded his eyes against so obvious a truth. Mundanus was a clever intelligent man, who had not been blessed with a religious education, but had gone through the usual course of study, had been ordained, and had held a small living in the country for many years. He was, in the ordinary sense of the term, a very respectable man. He left his living worth many more pounds a-year than he found it, and while he had thus prospectively benefitted his successors, he had amassed a considerable sum of money. He had always been a prudent thrifty man about the things of this world, and when he came to die, he expressed himself ready to go and meet his Judge, and to render up an account of his stewardship. He felt much self-satis- faction that he should leave a considerable property to ll"' 126 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? his poor relations, and complacently declared that he trusted in the merits of his Redeemer. While he was in this state, a pious neighbouring clergyman paid him a visit, and being sadly shocked at the condition in which this poor man was dying, evinced by his coun- tenance that he did not sympathize with Mundanus. Mundanus perceived the effect produced on his neigh- bour’s mind, and having a great respect for the man, and a real mistrust in his own declarations, conjured him to speak the truth. My good friend, said the other, I am not your judge, and I know too much ill of myself, and am too well acquainted with the difficulty of judging another, to venture to say anything to you ; bat as you conjure me in so strong a manner, I will speak the truth, and tell you what was passing through my mind. God forgive me, but I said within myself, how strong an illustration is this of the text of Scrip- ture ; ‘‘ If the light which is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness.” The light which has been in you, has been worldly prudence, if it be worthy of such a name, it is a talent for making the most of pounds, shillings, and pence — for it is not more than this ; and instead of the light which would have led you to heaven, you have substituted this light which has ruined you. God sent you into the w^orld that you might so pass through things temporal, as finally not to lose the things eternal. The children of this world are, in their generation, wiser than the children of light. You have been seeking things temporal, and you have succeeded. I have been seeking heaven, and I can see fifty cases in which you have acted with much more zeal and dis- THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. 127 4 cretion, in your work, than I have done in mine. God sent us into our two parishes, that we might become the means of improving the temporal, as well as eternal interests of our flock. You must confess that you have utterly neglected the spiritual care of your people ; and though you have well farmed and managed the glebe, I do not think that your success in the temporal prosperity of your people has been great ; but think for one moment of the spiritual state of your parish ! how many souls are there even now, who ought to have been taught by you — who ought to have been warned by you — who ought to have been reproved by you — they are gone, and who can say how far you may have to answer for their ruin ! He would have gone on, but he was interrupted. You judge very harshly of me, said the sick man. I judge not, I tell you what I was thinking of — I may be wrong — I hope I am ; and here, after mutual declarations of love and good will, they parted. The poor man neither saw his sin, nor would he, had he been framing a plan for his future life, have seen the remedy. Indeed, it is very difficult to say what human means could be taken to give light to such a state of darkness. But it will make any man who cares for his soul, not only say, how great is that dark- ness, but make him pray and strive that he may never fall into such a state. Our Saviour said to the young man, Sell all that thou hast and give to the poor and perhaps this may be the only step. No doubt in early life, this poor man stifled the wish to give of his substance. His present state is not the effect of acci- dent, but much of his wrong conduct may be due to a 128 % WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? wrong light at first. Had he devoted a portion of his temporal wealth to the use of the destitute ; had he tried to follow such rules of doing good, as his profes- sion imposed on him ; had he used the most obvious means of serving God, he could not, humanly speak- ing, have ever arrived at his present condition. Operosus had fallen into debt, when young, and been led to do what he was utterly ashamed of ; his fault had cured his carelessness, but it converted a spendthrift into a miser. He took means never to run in debt again ; but there was no reference to God in what he did, and he was cured of one fault, by adopting another, and the last state of that man was worse than the first. Pietosus had fallen into evil habits early in life, and was convinced of his error, and begged pardon again and again with sorrow and sincerity. But he never adopted the only steps by which the repetition of his sin would have been prevented ; and he continued for many years of his life, sinning and repenting, never casting off God, but constantly doing that which would most justly have led God to cast him off, had not God’s mercy been greater than our offences. He prayed fre- quently, but never strove ; he wished to enter in, but he never strove ; he never adopted such means to get the better of his sin as common sense would have dic- tated, had it been a question of earthly policy. It is not for man to say that he may not have been par- doned — but a child can see that he is not growing in grace. Minds differently constituted, are more apt to fall into the one or the other of these errors of attaching THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. 129 too much, or too little importance to the use of means. We are all in danger of both, but more in danger of the one than the other. Whole classes of persons, schools of religion, if we may call them so, are exposed to the same peculiarity of danger ; and in forming a plan of safety for the time to come, our security depends on our rightly estimating our peculiar peril. He who pretends to trust to the grace of God, without adopting any human means for keeping up his devo- tion, is but mocking his Maker. He who adopts the means without constant reference to a higher power, is trying to force a camel through the eye of a needle. Sanctification is the effect wrought in us by the grace of God, by the Holy Spirit, not hy ourselves, but generally through ourselves. The outward means are systematic instruction, enabling us to know the will of God, from the word of God — systematic prayer, public, domestic and private — the use of appointed means — as the sacraments. Systematic self-denial ; comprehend- ing such bodily restraints as shall bring the body into subjection to the better part of man. Systematic alms- giving, and in order to prevent our failing in these, systematic self-examination. The act is the outward means — the going to church ; the kneeling down regularly in private ; the fasting ; the avoiding society which is apt to betray us ; the avoiding some expense for the sake of having money to give away ; the giving away a certain proportion of our income ; the writing down notes of our spiritual state at certain periods : these are all means, very useful means, but he must have very little experience who relies much on such means. He 130 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? who trusts to pra^^er alone to prevent his sin, will more frequently find that his sins stop his prayers. Fasting may turn the mind from evil thoughts, but evil thoughts will more frequently prevent us from using due absti- nence. He who tries to overcome evil without em- ploying means (not means of his own invention, but such as God has appointed,) is throwing himself from the pinnacle of the Temple, because God has given his angels charge over him. He who trusts in the means, without due and entire reference to Him who appoint- ed the means, “ is resting on a broken reed, on which, if a man lean, it will go into his hand.” Therefore, in framing plans by which we may be enabled to over- come the evil which is within us ; by which we may walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise.” We must have the eye fixed on both these truths. We must employ every one of those instruments with which the great Captain of our salvation hath fur- nished us. We must put on the whole armour of God, that we may be enabled to stand in the day of trial. God is faithful, who will not sufiTer you to be tempted above that ye are able, but will, with the temptation, also make a way to escape.” He promises not to free us without a way^ but through a way pro- vided by himself; not by an invention of man, but by a gift of God. When David conquered Goliah, it was not with the weapon which Saul had provided, but by the smooth stone out of the brook, which the Lord had made ready. But the victory was gained by a smooth stone and a sling, and not by a miracle. By such a missile as a wise commander might have selected, and THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. 131 which was chosen by a merciful and almighty God. Man’s wisdom might have selected such a missile as best adapted to the prowess of the youthful champion, but it was the arm of the Lord which gave it its efficacy. When our Saviour fed the five thousand, it was with the loaves and the fishes which were already there. It was his power which made them adequate to the object, but he employed the means which were present to his hand. The lessons which all these considerations seem to teach us is this, that God has appointed means — that it is man’s duty to employ the means appointed by God — but that our success must depend on God’s blessing the means, and that the Almighty will force us to perceive that our success is due unto the Lord — that it is God’s gift, and not our working out. Chris- tianity might be preached, as it was at first, without a paid ministry, but when countries are prepared to entrust their defence to unpaid armies, then may Christian statesmen rely on an unpaid ministry. Till then they are bound to use the same human means for the attainment of safety against spiritual as against temporal enemies. And if they look to the Bible they will find that the priesthood was very amply provided for, under that dispensation wdiich was given to man by God himself — that God has ordained that they that preach the Gospel should live of the Gospel. Establishments will not secure the prevalence of Christianity. The}^ may even endanger its purity and safety. But let any man look at the state of the dense population of England — consider the danger we are 132 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? in, from heathenism and chartism — and say whether as a people we are not reaping the just fruit of ne- glecting the religious cultivation of our poor brethren. Men may talk of the separation of Church and State. They cannot be divided. They may exist without any very great connexion. There is a greater and a less connexion. The one may interfere with and tyrannize over the other. It is an union in which one or both parties may do right, or do wrong. But if God has ordained that kings should be the nursing fathers and queens the nursing mothers of his Church — woe be to those who govern without trying to fulfil this part of their duty — and woe be to the Church which is not in subjection to the civil authority of those whom God hath ordained to be a terror to evil doers, and a praise to them that do well. The reason- ing which is here applied to a kingdom, is equally applicable to individuals, or to smaller societies. Unless the appointed means be used, religion will never flourish in a parish, in a family, or in the heart of the individual. Unless we study the Bible we shall never understand the Bible. And why should a reasonable man expect to learn theology without the aid of duly educated instructors, when he would seek for their assistance on any other subject ^ Does not even our Lord refer us to the greater prudence of the children of this world, and teach us to learn his will by studying his will, as we would become proficients in any other branch of knowledge, by labouring to acquire that branch f He who in his system of religious duties substitutes hearing the word, for doing the will. THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. 133 who listens to sermons, and neglects prayer, self-denial and alms-giving, acts as the student of an}^ other art, who allows theory to take the place of practice. A rich old gentleman, who was a most regular attendant at chapel, and whose seat was well lined, and stood not far from the stove, who in the punctual recurrence of family prayers, always selected for him- self the softest cushion, and the warmest place, laughed heartily at the idea of an Archbishop of Canterbury who submitted his back from time to time to the scourges of his confessor ; and when he saw that a clerical friend with whom he was talking did not seem to view the matter in the same light, he said, “ You surely cannot think that this was necessary for his sanctification.” No, replied his friend, I do not. I conceive that Beckett misunderstood the nature of that self-denial which he attempted to put in practice ; but I cannot help believing that the Christian who avoided every inconvenience to which religion would expose him — ^who never denied himself one luxury of the table or of his person, by way of keeping his body in restraint — who is never ready to open his purse, be- cause he loves money — who never denied himself one expense, that he might have to give to him that needeth — whose one object in life is to please himself, has more entirely lost sight of the nature of self-denial — has made a much greater mistake. The housekeeper who never makes an analysis of his annual expenditthre, may, if he be generally pru- dent, go on without any great peril of becoming insolvent ; but he is certainly not likely to make the 12 134 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? most of his income. The Christian who never exam- ined what proportion of his property he expended in alms-giving, nor divided the sum so devoted, under several heads, may be doing what God would have him to do ; he may not let his left hand know what his right hand doeth but he has hardly yet learnt the meaning of the words, ‘‘Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness ” — he is hardly try- ing to do the greatest possible quantity of good with that money of which God has made him the steward. In the use of means fellow sinners must not dictate to each other — we have no right to insist on the employ- ment of any means which are not sanctioned by the command, or advice, of our great Master — but unless we are employing means, we are not walking circum- spectly. And we may observe the great mercy of God in the placing the means of grace so much before us, as he has done. Consider the blessing which the ministers of God are to his people. This is a Divine appointment and not a human invention. And who can say that they who reject the guidance of God’s appointed servants, may not be rejecting the means which God has destined for their spiritual well-being ? People may say that these observations are dictated by the force of professional prejudice, and I close the subject lest it should offend those who would otherwise admit the force of the reasoning, with reference to their personal advancement in holiness ; but I am sure that the general reasoning is true, that sanctification is the gift of God, and given as he pleases, not as we choose to presume. THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. 135 In looking at means whereby we may be sanctified, there are two classes of instruments, both appointed by God ; the one selected by ourselves and applied to our improvement, while in the application of the others, we have no more to do, than to endeavour to apply them to our spiritual good. The first class will embrace plans of study, prayer, and usefulness : the latter will consist in our circumstances in life, and the external advantages or disadvantages which are thrown in our way. Our sanctification depends on the right use made of each of these. No man can be safe, who has not laid down for himself rules with regard to each of the former means of grace. His natural temperament and circumstances will suggest which are most required for him, personally ; but when he comes to die, he will probably see that his success in the use of these, has depended more on what he has not done, than on that which his own prudence has achieved. That our being such as we are in holiness, has depended more on that, over which we had no control, than on that which we have selected for ourselves. That we are holy because God has not granted our wishes, rather than because we have obtained that for which we wished. And that the ordinary and most common means of grace, are those which have produced the most effect upon our souls, e. g*., we shall find that the institution of the Sabbath, and the observance of it, such as it has been forced upon us when young, and carried on from habit perhaps more than principle, has had more to do with our present sense of religion, than any other visible means of grace ; in short, that throughout it has been 136 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? more God’s doing than our own doing. But at the same time, we shall find, that whenever we neglect the means which are in our own power, then we fall, and render the general and special means which God has provided, ineffectual to our good. Every day’s expe- rience convinces us of the wisdom and mercy of the command, Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling and the blessedness of the promise, for it is God that worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.” And if any one will keep his eye fixed on the manner in which God has brought him so far on his way to heaven, or the manner in which God reforms some of his servants, advances others, and prepares us all ; he will discover that God does work in us. Mary Adams was the daughter of disreputable parents, who lived in the suburbs of a large town, and she went out to service to avoid the defilements of her home, and she became God’s servant, in heart as well as outwardly ; but she was careless and playful, and in an hour of sport she received a blow from a fellow servant, which ended in producing the cancer of which she died. When she was sent home to the house from which she had escaped, she was compelled to become once more the involuntary companion of the vile and reprobate, to hear language, and to witness scenes which her very soul abhorred. She was unable to do any thing for herself, and was forced to receive assist- ance from her sisters, whose daily conduct was a grief and shame to their dying relative ; though her family all treated her with as much kindness as they were THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. 137 capable of. There was no one to whom she could speak with comfort, excepting the clergyman of the parish, to whom, in her misery, the wretched mother had recourse ; he, while poor Mary lived, was constant in his visits, and witnessed the rapid growth in grace which took place in the soul of this afflicted servant of a crucified Redeemer. Her faith and hopes were strong, and she lived to thank God with apparent warmth and sincerity, for the medicine with which she believed that he was cleansing her heart, and preparing her for heaven. If I had gone on in service, sir, said she one day, who can say that I might not have again become careless as to the state of my soul ? The rude sport in which I was engaged when I received the blow, was as far as I know, innocent ; but who can say that it might not have led to guilt } God knew how weak I am, and he has saved me from future dangers ; and if my path be painful, it is at least a narrow and a straight path. I can generally bear it pretty well, and when I give way through agony, he who sent the pang will pardon the want of patience. Even our Lord cried out, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me And per- haps these very tears and sobs, from which I cannot always abstain, may be intended to do good to those who see and hear them. Ah, sir ! do all you can, to bring my poor relations to a better state ! ! and I often think that God may be pleased to do good to some of them, through the sufferings which they witness in me ; perhaps he may, and what a comfort it would be to die with such a hope, that a sister or a brother, or a parent, may be led to think of their poor souls, 12 * ]38 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? through the mercy which God shows to me. I often tell them, sir, that I have deserved more, and when they talk of the hardness of my being afflicted, while they escape, I try to convince them that they will not escape. Do pray, sir, that God may have mercy on them. And thus the'hope that God would have mercy on those sinful relatives, supported the soul of a maid- servant, under torments so great, that they almost daily interrupted her fervent prayers ; and she who was again and again forced to say, “ Do wait a little, I shall be able to pray again in a few minutes,” — I beg your pardon, sir, I cannot go on now, I am in so much pain,” — she was comforted and supported by the hope of en- joying that delight, which our Saviour spoke of, when he said, There is joy in the presence of the angels of God, over one sinner that repenteth.” God suited his dispensations to the need of this poor young woman, and the seed was sown in good ground, and brought forth many fold. God’s dispensations are always suited to us, but we do not always receive them as she did. And the prudent Christian, in looking forward to his own progress in grace, will strive to prepare himself for the dispensations which God may send, by adopting those general rules which our holy religion suggests. He will watch and pray. Watch, lest any want of caution on his own part, should destroy the seed sown b}^ the mercy of Heaven : and pray that the Almighty would suit his graces and dispensations to our wants and necessities. His earnest endeavour will be, that he may continue steadily to employ every human means — that his mind may never be turned away from the THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD, 139 desire after holiness, and the adoption of every method by which God has pointed out to his creatures the way to their advancement in holiness. But his prayer and his hope will be, that God may work in him not only to will, but to do. He will say, perhaps, to him- self, With man it is impossible — but with God all things are possible.” I have so often tried and failed, that for myself, it is impossible that I should ever be fit for the presence of just men made perfect, and of the saints in glory, and of Christ himself. But God can make me fit. And God does make us fit. The last sickness of many a Christian is rendered blessed by a rapid growth in grace, particularly when there is much suffering borne with Christian patience. The impatient naan prays that he may be enabled to conquer his want of kindness to those whom he has previously treated with less tenderness than they deserved ; and God lays him on a bed of anguish, and these relatives become the gentle nurses of his dying hours, and his sufferings are cheered by their continued attentions ; and he thanks them, and does get the better of that which had been his fault towards them ; and they, in the performance of a painful duty, are themselves sanc- tified. How many a young person has found a con- sumptive death to be the quiet gate of everlasting bliss. We must be careful not to mistake that softening of the mind which proceeds from the body, for the working of the grace of God ; but they who have attended death- beds, know the progress in holy acquiescence to the will of God, which frequently displays itself in the later periods of those who are d3fing of consumption. Not 140 WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY ? long before her death, Euphemia addressed her mother and the clergyman of the parish, in the following terms : When I was first aware that my disorder was dan- gerous, I grieved at the thought of leaving a world in which I had so much to hope for, and in which I had anticipated so much of enjoyment. To quit, at an early age, parents and kindred, and to give up the prospect of a connection which ‘seemed to promise every thing which earth can give, did seem hard, and God forgive me for feeling, as I confess I felt ; but he has dealt with me graciously, and not given me over to my own foolish thoughts, and I have gradually learnt to acquiesce in his dispensations, and to see their wisdom, and to rejoice in them. I would not have it otherwise than it is. Doubtless I am not only more fit to die than I was, but am more fit than I should have been if 1 had shared those comforts to which I looked forward. Sure am I, that all is done in mercy, and that I am taken from earthly trials because I am not equal to pass through them safely. He has taught me the blessedness of those who mourn, and even before I fly away and am at peace, I have received comfort such as earth cannot give, and which 1 trust that God will suffer nothing to take away.” There is a theory, that as soon as in our earthly course, we are either hopeless as to reform, or fitted for heaven — God takes us from this scene of trial The bad are cut off, lest they should incur a more dreadful weight of guilt. The good are gathered into the garner of heaven, and are at rest. We who are still exposed to temptations, and must bear the load of THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. 141 this world’s labour and affliction, are not yet worthy of our being admitted into the joy of our Lord — not yet suited to so high a privilege and gift. God might fit us for this blessed state by the fiat of his Almighty word. He created Adam in all the beauty and per- fection of manhood. He exalted Enoch at once to a better place. But we have passed through the weak- ness of childhood, the dangers of youth, the toils of manhood, and have been thus prepared to fulfil the duties of that station to which it has pleased God to call us ; and why may we not expect the same steps in our spiritual life ^ When the seed is sown in the best soil, there must be first the blade, then the ear, then the full corn in the ear. And if God is pleased to continue you and me, dear reader, in this state of trouble, why may we not hope that it is for our sanc- tification ? That which we can do, will in no way tend to buy off our guilt, or to purchase the favour of our Maker, but he may of his goodness employ our exertions for the good of others, and for the improve- ment of ourselves. Humanly speaking, we owe our conversion to Christianity, as a nation, to the labours of the Apostles ; and who, in reading the acts of those holy men, can doubt, that St. Peter and St. Paul were purified and prepared for heaven while engaged in this work of the Lord. It may seem presumption, that sinners, such as we are, should dare to compare our- selves in any manner to those blessed instruments of good, whom we so justly honour as the benefactors of the human race ; but the same God, who is rich in mercy to all who call upon him, may vouchsafe to 142 \VHAT IS CHRISTIANITY? bestow a small portion of the same heavenly blessing on us, who are so little worthy of it. In the case of St. Paul, to live,” was to continue in the service of Christ, and to die was gain.” He had a desire to depart and to be with Christ, nevertheless, to abide in the flesh was more needful for man.” To us, pro- bably there may be ties which still bind us to earth ; there may be duties and fields of usefulness which may enable us to hope, that our stay on earth may be beneficial to some of those who are connected with us : and conscious of our own present defects, we may hope, that while we stay in the flesh, we may still be growing in the spirit. That the grace of God may be softening our hearts, and leading us to a closer con- formity to the blessed example of our Saviour. But our hope is built on what shall be done for us, and not on anything which we can do ourselves. And we may daily pray, that He who can, alone, order the unruly wills and affections of sinful men, may so guide every- thing belonging to us, that all shall work together for our good. That the changes and chances of this mortal life may be so ordered, as best to promote our spiritual improvement ; and that we may have grace to adopt such regulations with regard to ourselves, as shall best tend to make us ready for a state of glory. But we shall come to the contest, trusting in what God shall do for us. We may choose the smoothest pebbles, and fit them with most prudent care to the sling with which we have armed ourselves, but when we advance to the contest, it shall be in the name of the Lord God of hosts, and our watch-word and our THE CHRISTIAN LOOKING FORWARD. 143 prayer shall be, may God work in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure. O Lord, raise up (we pray Thee) thy power, and come among us, and with great might succour us ; that whereas, through our sin and wickedness, we are sore let and hindered in running the race that is set before us, thy bountiful grace and mercy may speedily help and deliver us ; through the satisfaction of thy Son our Lord, to whom, with Thee and the Holy Ghost, be honour and glory, world without end. Amen.