;.*>;>3is^ LINCOLN ROOM UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY ^^-^ THE FIRST PUBLISHED LIFE OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN WRITTEN IN THE YEAR MDCCCLX, BY JOHN LOCKE SCRIPPS REPRINTED IN THE YEAR MDCCCC, BY THE CRANBROOK PRESS ccp ./ 45105 SOMETIME in 1894 I received a. letter from the Me Joseph P. Smith, Librarian of the Ohio State Library, asking for information about, or copies of, a pamphlet Life of Abraham Lincoln luritten in J 860 by John Locke Scripps of the Chicago Tribune. In his letter he 'wrote : " It, the pamphlet, ivas pub- lished in J 860 immediately prior to or shortly after Mr, Lin- coln's nomination. Passages are quoted from it by Holland, Thayer, and other early biographers of Lincoln, and there is no doubt but that most of the biography, if not all, passed under Mr. Lincoln's immediate personal revision, and hence its value," J- This letter revealed to me the fact that this publication, 'ujhich at that time I had never seen, would possess rare value in collec- tions pertaining to the history of this great man, and at once led me to make search for a copy, or for information in regard to it. Old family letters, yellowed and dimmed with age, were searched^ but almost ivithout success, ^ Finally after hours and days of research, in which members of the family no^i) ividely scattered over the United States joined me, the following portion of a letter was discovered by my father's brother, the late George W, Scripps of Detroit: I ha'oe been getting out a. campa.ign Life of Lincoln for the million •which is published simultaneously by us and by the New York Tribune establishment. I presume a very large edition 'will be sold. I 'will send you a copy by this day's mail. We sell them at the very Lrju rate of $20.00 per thousand. I do not believe that any comhination can defeat Lincoln. Will the running of the Bell-Everett ticket in this State lose us arty votes in Schuyler ? Affectionately, J. L. SCRIPPS. j^In a tetter received from my father's sister, Mrs. M. A. *Bagby, no larger. They also desire a policy that looks to a peaceful end of slavery at some time, as being wrong. These are the views they entertain in regard to it, as I understand them; and all their sentiments— all their arguments and propo- sitions — are brought within this range. I have said, and I repeat it here, that if there be a man amongst us who does not think that the institution of slavery is -wrong in any one of the aspects of which I have spoken, he is misplaced, and ought not to be with us. And if there be a man amongst us who is so impatient of it as a wrong as to disregard its actual presence among us and the difficulty of getting rid of it suddenly in a satisfactory way, and to disregard the consti- tutional obligations thrown about it, that man is misplaced if he is on our platform. We dis- claim sympathy with him in practical action. He is not placed properly with us. On this subject of treating it as a wrong, and limi ting its spread, let me say a word. Has anything ever threatened the existence of tliis Union save and except this very institution of slavery? What is it that we hold most dear amongst us? Our own liberty and prosperity. What has ever threatened our liberty and prosperity save and except this institution of slavery? If tfiis is true, how do you propose to improve the condition of things by enlarging slavery — by spreading it out and making it bigger? You may have a wen or cancer upon your person and not be able to cut it out lest you bleed to death; but surely it is no way to cure it, to engraft it and spread it over your whole body. That is no proper way of treating what you regard as a ■wrong. You see this peaceful way of dealing with it as a wrong — restricting the spread of it, and not allowing it to go into new countries where it has not already existed. That is the peaceful way, the old-fashioned way, the way in which the fathers themselves set us the example. k 81 On the other hand, I have said there is a sentiment which treats it as noi being wrong. That is the Democratic sentiment of this day. I do not mean to say that every man who stands within that range positively asserts that it is right. That class will include all who positively assert that it is right, and all who like Judge Douglas treat it as indifferent, and do not say it is either right or wrong. These two classes of men fall within the general class of those who do not look upon it as a wrong. And if there be among you anybody who supposes that he, as a Democrat, can consider himself " as much opposed to slavery as anybody," I would like to rea- son with him. You never treat it as a wrong. What other thing that you consider as a wrong do you deal with as you deal with that ? Perhaps you say it is wrong, but your leader ne-ver does, and you quarrel ■with anybody luho says it is