SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION AT RUTGERS FEMALE COLLEGE.* (proposed 1872 ; ESTABLISHED 1886.) The very statement of the subject here announced takes for granted that Col- leges are requisite for young women ; that they are to be distinct from those for young men ; and that in them special modifications of the established curriculum will be both requisite and legitimate. These postulates demand passing review that the modifications proposed may be rightly appreciated. The demand for higher and truly collegiate education has been awakened with- in the last twenty years in our own country and in Europe, just in proportion as the recognition of increased popular representation in government has prevailed. In England simultaneously with increased extension of suffrage the voice of public sentiment called for the establishment of a University Course of Lectures for Women. At Hitchin, a location midway between London and Cambridge, an insti- tution was established at which the professors from both centers met to give courses of lectures. During the past year, the professors at London have resolved to furnish in the city itself a course of lectures for young women ; the ladies providing for themselves board, lodging, and other means of support. This London movement has determined the professors at Cambridge to remove the institution at Hitchin to a location within two miles of that seat of learning, so that it can be under their immediate supervision. Turning to Russia, we observe that, only a few years after the emancipation of the serfs, not only elementary schools, but also fully organized Colleges for female education began to be provided. Returning thence westward to Germany and France, the careful observer notes that some of the ablest writers are urging the establishment of collegiate instruction for young women ; and are arguing its necessity from the advancement which the common people are making in the control they exert over political affairs. It is needless to dwell on the fact now so palpable that, in our country, there is * Author’s Note. — The following paper, read at the Convocation of the Regents of the University of the State of New York, Aug. 6th to 8th, 1872, and published both in their proceed- ings, in the N. Y. State Educational 'Journal, and in a separate pamphlet by the Regents, is now, on the writer’s resumed connection with the College, republished by request. While the order of studies proposed must be that pursued if College degrees are given, in Colleges for young women as for young men the most thorough training for partial and special students is provided. Regents’ Note.— In introducing the following paper the writer stated that several con- siderations had prompted its preparation. A careful study of the progress of collegiate instruction in Europe and America, during the last twenty-five years, had led to the conviction that female education was to receive greater attention than even that now given to our best Colleges. Again, after performing a personal duty to all his sons, now men, at Columbia College, D. C., he had been called to the same responsibility as to his daughters, yet young, at Rutgers Female College, New York City. Yet more, his careful observation as an instructor had revealed the fact that, while the aspiration of female college pupils for high attainments is even more controlling than in young men, scarcely one is to be met who does not rejoice at the wisdom which led the New York State Legislature to restrict Rutgers College from conferring “ professional degrees.” 2 SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION AT EUTGEES FEMALE COLLEGE. a demand not simply on the part of young women, but also of their parents, for a thorough collegiate education as the “ right ” to which females are unquestionably entitled. The questions incidentally associated with this demand, especially the suggestion that w^omen should receive the right of franchise, add to, if they do not in one sense originate this demand ; since the question whether this demand is legitimate must be determined by educated women themselves, in order to be safely and legitimately settled. This association of two ideas is an intimation of two principles, whose relation should be carefully considered. In the first place, it is a recognition of the fallacy so current, and yet never con- trolling, that an elementary education is all that is required for the fulfillment of life’s mission, both by men and women. Surely this suggestion overlooks the fact, so palpable to every one who thinks the subject through, that the mission of society as a whole requires the higher education which furnishes’ men of science, art, and letters ; without whom none of the industrial enterprises of a community could be kept up, and without whom, too, any State would soon be an anarchy. Equally apparent is it that, unless a people are to put themselves in the power of an edu- cated class separate from their families and community and strangers to their sympathies, they must provide this higher education for their own sons. This fact becomes so palpable to thinking men that colleges for young men abound ; and parents have sufficient ambition to secure it for their sons. The new and persistent call for female colleges recognizes another principle. The culture of women, and that alone, secures and makes available the culture of men. Search where we will, analyze the social influences that rule in a Turkish or English community, open history at any page, and we find the truth as permanent as human nature, that all efforts to secure true culture among men have succeeded only so far as female culture has prevailed. The rise of an Aspasia, the inspirer of Socrates, as he himself avowed, is not an exception in human history ; it is the rule. All studious observers know that men, associated with women of high position in European society, have been made in childhood or manhood what they are by the moulding power of cultured women. The sojourner in the mansions of families who for generations maintain their ascendency anywhere in Europe, has learned that the daughters receive as thorough an education as the sons, who graduate from the university. While the idea of higher education is restricted to a class, this will ever remain true. But when the sons and daughters of the people generally claim their title to sit among the princes, when a Russian emperor seeks to have an emancipated people prove worthy of freedom, when in America any young woman may be called to sustain the reputation of a husband occupying official station, parents will aspire to give a higher education to their daughters, and statesmen will appreciate their per- sistent demand. The neglect which has led to the endowments of hundreds of colleges for young men in our country, while scarcely one man has thought practically of the manifest truth just stated, is one of those wondrous oversights from which men often suddenly awake, wondering that they should have been so long blinded. The demand for collegiate education we may then regard a legitimate one ; and colleges for young women will certainly be furnished by Americans, when Japanese sagacity is discerning their necessity. The question then next arises whether any SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION A T RUTGERS FEMALE COLLEGE. 3 modification in the curriculum is requisite in such colleges. These two palpable facts meet the comprehensive observer : the peculiar cast of woman’s intellect as compared with man’s, and her sphere of intellectual influence as separate from his, demand an education parallel to, yet the counterpart of the established college curriculum. Recent discussion in England as to increased facilities for female culture have led able writers to search the annals of the past, in order to trace the distinction always recognized between the intellectual cast of woman and that of man. From the days of our first mother, the more earnest spirit of inquiry and the quick intui- tions have been characteristic of woman’s mind as contrasted with man’s. Napoleon said, after he had learned to speak frankly, “ that in his divorce from Josephine he lost his best counselor ; that her instincts were truer than his reasonings ; and that her first-glance impressions of men and measures were both more clear and more impartial than those of his cabinet.” That man of large success in business is an exception who has not found his wife’s intuitions the happy supplement, the per- fect complement of his less impartial estimates and of his more tardy calcula- tions. Yet, again, strength is the general characteristic of intellect in man and grace in woman. The cimeter of the light-horse Saladin cuts hairs in argument when the claymore of Coeur-de-Leon does not break a casque. The ox-like drag of man’s heavy-moving mental machinery is outrun by the careering sally and dash that sparkle in woman’s debate. No one fails to admit that from the day when our first father yielded to his companion aspiring to be wise, woman has in all history carried her point in differences with man. Assuredly, then, this positive power, so controlling, should be guided by thorough culture. This leads naturally to the consideration of woman’s sphere, as it is now dis- cussed. That sphere, fixed by nature, never has been, and, from the necessity of the case, never can be materially changed. The family is and ever must be the founda- tion of all human society. If the family be regarded as an association for industrial provision, we are met by the fact that every successful business copartnership has its indoor and outdoor head. If the family be viewed as the school for the wider relation of political association, we know that government must have its appointed official representative. If yet, again, the family be considered in its higher aspect as the divinely established agency for the perpetuation and moulding of a race pre- pared to accomplish his special purposes, then there can be no question which one of the partners is called to the indoor and which to the outdoor duties of home and country ; which to the rough exposure and which to quiet moulding. It is wonder- ful, now, to remark how comprehensive thinkers have brought harmony into dis- cussions as to woman’s sphere, which have at times created an unnatural aspiring, sure to meet disappointment. When Plato, by his Republic, had inaugurated at Athens the same partial philosophy now rife as to female suffrage and official pre- cedence, Aristotle called attention to the facts which always have decided and always will decide. The Greeks had always, unlike the Asiatics, maintained monog- amy ; because there were about the same number of each sex born into the world, and because the Greeks thought every man as an equal, entitled to one companion. The relation of husband and wife he regarded as always subject to voluntary choice ; and the position of each in the family that of joint office ; woman, because of man’s 4 SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION AT RUTGERS FEMALE COLLEGE. constant public occupation away from his home, being the virtual head of the family, while man’s rule was only occasional at home but constant in society at large. As to political relations, the same profound thinker distinguished between civic right which entitles every individual to protection by law, and political right which gives to the portion of the community fitted for its exercise a voice in making and maintaining government. The latter demands three qualifications : the capac- ity to decide by practical intercourse with men what should be law ; the habit of association with men which gives discriminating judgment as to acts in violation of law ; and the physical ability to bear arms in the forcible execution of law. Woman’s sphere in the family manifestly unfits her for all these three offices : the legislative, judicial, and executive functions of government. All history indicates that woman, by her moral influence, may privately control the counsels of men in their associations for public ends ; and that same history equally shows that it is women who are women indeed, filling their positions as heads of families, who most instinctively condemn the few unsexed advocates of female suffrage, who, from personal ambition, misrepresent their sex. All discussions as to the modifications of collegiate education for young women must proceed on the supposition that her sphere of influence is the old established realm fixed by her nature, that of family and social control, which has always most ruled the action of parliaments and of courts, of armies and of nations. Directing now our attention to our main topic — the ends and means of higher education employed in past and in present times — we find a striking likeness in the practice of civilized nations. Education, as the word implies, is the drawing out, rather than the storing of the mind. It is like the training of the mechanic, of the artist, and of the engineer, which develops, directs, and energizes natural power. The mind’s powers, which require practical drawing out, are those of thought and of expression ; the one that truth may be attained, the other that it may be successfully imparted. The fundamental studies employed as means for this development have been in all historic ages, in ancient Egypt and India, in Greece and Rome, and they are now in modern Asiatic and European colleges, these two as primary : mathematics and the classic languages. In mathematical reason- ing, the most youthful pupil knows whether the process is correct or not ; and he can point directly to any error and to its result. The merest child that, by its own effort, seeks the sentiment of another’s mind through a foreign language, and is daily called in translation to express that thought readily in its own tongue, is employing a means of culturing both thought and expression for which human wisdom has never been able to devise a substitute. The discussions in England during Arnold’s day, in Russia within the past year, and of our American educators during recent changes in collegiate instruction, have confirmed the philosophic con- clusion that the study of the cultured classic tongues, from which all the languages of Europe have derived their terms of science, of art, and of philosophy, are abso- lutely essential in three respects to true mental development : first, as the structural foundation of all modern cultured tongues ; second, as the storehouse of scientific nomenclature ; third, and mainly, as a developer of the power of thought and of expression, which can receive no substitute. Young women must either remain wanting in the very elements of mental development, or these first lessons in intel- I SYSTEM OF TNSTFUCTION AT RUTGERS FEMALE COLLEGE. lectual gymnasia, the mathematics and the classic tongues, must be fundamental in female colleges. In all ages, however, the mere gymnasium, or provision for simple development of the mind’s powers, has been made but the preparation for university studies, which are to store the mind ; and these have been pursued with more or less of completeness in our colleges as time and facilities have allowed. These may, per- haps, in higher departments of collegiate education, be grouped under these seven schools : mechanics and natural philosophy, embracing applications of the mathe- matics; natural history, including plant, animal, and human anatomy and physiology, with geology ; language and literature, embracing all those studies designed to give practical skill in the use of foreign tongues ; rhetoric and logic, which afford power in the use of one’s native language ; aesthetics and criticism, embracing prac- tical as well as theoretical acquaintance with the fine arts ; civil history, political science, and economics ; and moral and intellectual philosophy. In each of these departments of collegiate study, not only the demands of general culture, but the practical demands of her sphere, require that a young woman become proficient. Young men devoted to any pursuit, industrial or intellectual, are trained in mechanics, astronomy, and natural philosoph)' as an essential part of general culture. To young women the principles of mechanical laws will be directly practical in the varied oversight of the household, which are always either directly or indirectly woman’s care. Very few young men are called to any practical application of their knowledge of anatomy, physiology, and hygiene ; but every physician, knowing that sickness and its cure are to be met in all households, and are always woman’s responsible charge, feels that his prescriptions will be sure of efficiency only where an intelligent nurse presides. A man of collegiate training, engrossed in profes- sional pursuits, feels no hesitation in avowing at home and abroad that he has no time to keep up with the current literature of the day, or to acquire facility in the use of a foreign language ; but his companion, educated or not in the school, would be mortified to make a similar avowal. Young men, who design to devote them- selves to business rather than professional life, are urged in college to train them- selves to proficiency in logic, rhetoric, and elocution, since not onl}?’ in public but in private circles this acquisition is absolutely essential to meet with ease and grace the tax of cultured association ; and in this the women of our day are and must be leaders. For, in all history, theory might anticipate, and experience confirms as the fact, that a literary atmosphere never pervades society, unless women of culture compel the conversation of the social circle where men and women meet, into a common channel, as they cannot in conversation as to the business pursuits that occupy them ; and even here elocutionary training is found indispensable to facility, grace, and attractiveness in literary conversation. In the fine arts, especially in music and drawing, practically if not theoretically, it is the exception when the educated man is proficient ; but with young women the exception in such attainment is always marked as a defect in natural gifts or in early training. In the practical application of the lessons of history, in the philosophy that underlies especially politics and economics, woman is more practically interested than man ; for if man gathers wealth, she controls its expenditure ; if business-men seek fragments of time for consideration of the means which keep up the physical and moral health of the 6 SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION A T RUTGERS FEMALE COLLEGE. body-politic, woman is expected to share most largely in correcting the evils which unwise legislation and violations of law entail. Yet, again, who knows not that it is the wife, the sister, whose intellectual and moral influence is expected to give law to men trained even in the college ; and how is this possible unless man's knowl- edge in these departments be woman’s also ? In each department of collegiate instruction, if women be considered merely as the companions of men, woman’s need is if anything greater than man’s; and the college should be as much for the one as for the other. But how enhanced this demand when we consider that woman’s culture is to give shape to succeeding generations. While the wife and sister by their culture give character to the social circle and thus to the real spirit of a nation and-an age, it is pre-eminently the mother’s culture, not the father’s, that gives the first spring, the early shape, the mature moulding to the intellectual and moral cast of the age next succeeding, and thus to generations still to arise. The impressive fact that while under European institutions, religious, political, and educational, families are built up which for generations maintain an elevated position and a superior culture, scarcely a single American family has survived the decline of the second generation, is beginning to awaken the attention of men who seek for themselves, their family, and their country something more than an ephemeral fame. Children of our great and princely men drag down to oblivion the worthiest name, because the generation that next wears it shows a lack of fidelity most vital in the educational training of heirs who should prove worthy of their parents. Where are our princely families in the land, whose princes in wealth and wisdom of the first generation, nevertheless, so greatly abound ? Which of our noble statesmen, generals, merchants has left descendants that gave increased lustre to his name? So rare is the exception to the fact that the very children trained in the household of the noblest specimens of American manhood disgrace the parents who should have made them worthy — so rare is the exception, that the causes of this anomaly begin to awaken earnest in- quiry. It is worthy an hour’s thought ; but to one, mainly, of these two causes it must be referred : either the father has too much to do to gain and to maintain his own high position, and therefore neglects the training of his children, or the mother lacks that practical wisdom which thorough collegiate training affords. This latter, as history attests, is the main error. The mere material, superficial, artificial show of her family absorbs the thought and labor of its head ; which, if directed by the counsels and control of an educated mind, would make her children derive from their increased facilities an advance on their parents and their generation at large, that would secure perpetuated families of growing power in every department of life. This double demand, then, for higher female education, the controlling in- fluence it will certainly have on the existing age and its forming and growing power over the next, calls back our thought to the leading point of our proposed con- sideration : The Modifications of the established Curriculum requisite and legitimate in Female Colleges. Our previous survey of the cast of woman’s mind as the comple- ment of man’s, of her sphere as the supplement of his, and of the direct tendency of the college curriculum to develop and direct the mental energies of a young woman as well as of a young man, while at the same time they are more generally practical SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION A T RUTGERS FEMALE COLLEGE. 7 in woman’s than in man’s lifelong vocation, restricts this final survey to a narrow limit. Every one of the seven departments of university, as distinct from gymnasia studies, is as important in female as in male education. Within the last few years the increasing importance of special training for lucrative industrial pursuits has called for modifications of the curriculum to meet the wants of our young men destined to different professions. A careful discrimination, directed to the special vocation of woman as distinct from man’s, fixed as this her vocation is by her peculiar cast of mind, may suggest modifications perhaps even more legitimate than those made for different classes of young men. To woman, grace, rather than strength, is the natural divine gift ; she is to rule by gentle yet effectual persuasion, rather than by stern close-linked and hard- pressed conviction ; and her domain is more purely aesthetic and moral than it is logical and intellectual. This calls for another glance at the several departments of collegiate study, to see in what schools woman’s culture must be more extended and in what it may be less labored, than in colleges for young men. Commencing with the classic languages, it is manifest that young women must make greater attainments in modern languages than young men ; especially in French as the language of common intercourse, in German as the language of literary research, and in the Italian as the language of art. This demands a more restricted study of the classic tongues. Here our attention is called to the fact that in former times special selections were made from classic authors, as Caesar, Virgil, and Cicero, required for entrance into college ; while now whole books of these authors are to be passed in review. Practical teachers now find, that, for a few weeks, a new author will be carefully studied until his peculiar style is mastered; when the rest of the entire volume is carelessly run through, either from the attrac- tion of the narrative, or as a drudgery that must be undergone. Much of the time thus devoted to classic authors, many thoughtful teachers cannot but regard a waste ; while some will come to the forced conclusion that, by cultivating habits of careless study, this undigested storing is worse than useless for all purposes of genuine culture. The female college may certainly take the position that the thorough mastery of the general structure of the Latin and Greek tongues at- tained in the grammar of these languages, a practical power to employ their etymology and syntax by the drilling of prose composition, and a familiarity with the vocabulary and idioms of the best historical, poetical, and philosophical writers attained in choice selections from a few works, as a modification of the curriculum of classic study, may give time for added lessons in modern languages, while attended with no real loss of true culture in the classic tongues. Turning, again, to the second department of gymnasia studies, the mathematics, these two facts are to be observed. The end of this study is twofold ; to train the mind to detect errors in the process of thought, and to give an understanding of the principles of mechanism framed by man and established by the Maker of all in the material universe. These ends are indispensable in female mental develop- ment. But the practical teacher has learned that full one-half of the labored demonstrations of propositions in geometry, two-thirds of the problems in algebra, and like proportions of the treatises on trigonometry, algebraic geometry, and calcu- SYSTEM OF INSTRUCTION A T RUTGERS FEMALE COLLEGE. lus are repetitions both in principle and detail ; and that they occasion, as do repeti- tions in classic readings, either a listless or a careless habit of study ; securing, indeed, facility from review to practical mathematicians, but giving no new employ- ment to the mental powers, and furnishing no new principle for future use in terres- trial and celestial mechanics. The same reduction may here be made in the mathe- matical as in the classical curriculum ; and this may afford the time requisite for aesthetic and art studies, specially demanded in female as distinct from male collegiate education. The naturalness and hence the legitimacy of these sugges- tions will appear on a moment’s reflection. As the study of the ancient languages is directly subsidiary to that of the modern languages, whose words, if not their idioms, are largely derived from the former, so the study of the mathematics, as the ancient Greeks had learned, have a bearing on the fine arts quite as important as on the mechanic arts. It is needless to dwell on the minor modifications that the good sense and observation of every educator will suggest as appropriate for female culture in the other departments of college study. As already intimated, the amount of time given to modern languages in female colleges must be greater than in colleges for young men. It follows necessarily from this fact, also, that a different method of instruction must be pursued, since the end to be attained is practical facility in speaking at least French and German ; which cannot be secured without direct use of these languages in certain parts of collegiate instruction, or by the employment of them in certain hours devoted to college pursuits. It will be naturally suggested, too, that instruction in elocution has a different end and must take a different character from that given to it in young men’s training. It is not, however, for that reason to be neglected ; since the elocutionary training of the college is deemed essential even for those who do not intend to be public speakers ; who need, how- ever, to acquire confidence, ease, and grace in communicating their thoughts in private and social circles. As this is pre-eminently woman’s sphere of intellectual and moral influence, while none of the special styles of elocution, as the dramatic for the stage, the oratorical for the platform, or the didactic for the desk, are demanded, that other general style properly called the conversational, which can take on, upon occasion and for the moment, either of the features of the three special styles, that which gives special vivacity and effectiveness to every popular speaker in public or private, — this is to be a part of an educated young woman’s training. In closing this cursory survey, it must be apparent that the special form which is to be given to female colleges, now becoming a reality in the State of New York, demands the attention of our very ablest men devoted to the subject of educa- tion ; not simply that of those who are giving their energies directly to it. It is certain that colleges specially devoted to female education must be furnished for young women. If trustees are brought to think it proper that existing colleges be opened for young women, those who most long for such education will not overcome that delicacy of sensibility which forbids their entrance. Yet more, if admitted, and if accepting the proffer, the curriculum specially prepared for young men will prove quite unadapted to the intellectual development of true women.