THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY 370 116 . No. 26-34 • . ssarissss*' University of Illinois Library til OCT 31 W JAM 2 3 W5 OCT 2 5 IMS OCT 2 3 198S FEB 4 p L161 — H41 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/objectivesofunit33monr BULLETIN NO. 33 BUREAU OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION OBJECTIVES OF UNITED STATES HISTORY IN GRADES SEVEN AND EIGHT By Walter S. Monroe Director, Bureau of Educational Research And M. E. Herriott Associate, Bureau of Educational Research PRI ' PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS. URBANA 1926 <37o PREFACE In discussing educational objectives a distinction is usually made between those that may be called ultimate and those which make up the immediate goals toward which pupils should direct their attention. Ultimate objectives are usually expressed in such general terms that it is difficult, if not impossible, to determine the degree of compatibility between them and the day-by-day work of the classroom. Immediate objectives, on the other hand, are usually stated in detail and in terms closely related with the daily work of pupils. However, the acceptance of a formulation of immediate objectives by a teacher does not neces- sarily mean that his instruction stimulates and guides his pupils toward these goals. It frequently happens that certain objectives are accepted in theory or on paper but the energies of the class are directed toward very different objectives as a result of the assignments made and the tests employed to measure achievement. The investigation reported in this bulletin represents an attempt to ascertain the actual objectives of teachers of United States history in grades seven and eight. In this respect it differs from most studies relating to the determination of educational objectives. The Bureau of Educational Research is indebted to the teachers of Champaign and Piatt counties who responded to the request for state- ments concerning the objectives in United States history and takes this occasion to make a public acknowledgment. Walter S. Monroe., Director. July 30, 1926. [3] OBJECTIVES OF UNITED STATES HISTORY IN GRADES SEVEN AND EIGHT The nature and function of objectives. In any endeavor an ob- jective or aim is necessary in order that one's efforts may be directed towards a definite goal. Aimless, random, haphazard, and similar terms are used to describe activity when there is no objective. The function of immediate objectives in United States history is to provide aims for both teachers and pupils in the field of this school subject. In the case of a pupil the objectives specify what he should learn as the result of /— studying the subject, and hence provide goals toward which he may direct his efforts. For the teacher, objectives serve as guides in planning ^ assignments, devising questions and other exercises for the recitation period, and formulating tests to measure the achievements of his pupils. General statements of objectives are not satisfactory for these purposes. Both teachers and pupils need detailed statements of what is to be learned. The problem. Most studies of objectives have been attempts to find what a student should be asked to learn. The investigation de- scribed in the following pages deals with a different problem. An attempt is made to answer the following questions: (1) What do cer- tain groups of teachers think pupils in the seventh and eighth grades should learn in the field of United States history? (2) How do the judgments of these teachers agree with certain determinations of ob- jectives in United States history? 1 Before describing the investigation it will be helpful to consider the meaning of objectives in history and some of their general charac- teristics. Types of achievement in history. 2 Achievement in history includes the acquisition of a large number of ideas or meanings such as those J These questions were suggested by Charles Mcintosh, County Superintendent of Piatt County, Illinois. 2 For an elaboration of this topic see: Herriott, M. E. "How to make courses of study in the social studies." Univer- sity of Illinois Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 5, Bureau of Educational Research Circular No. 46. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1926, p. 8-17. See also: Monroe, Walter S. "Teacher's Objectives." University of Illinois Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 39, Bureau of Educational Research Circular No. 45. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1926. 24 p. [5] represented by discovery, exploration, colony, constitution, Continental Congress, party, whigs, term of office, economic conditions, campaign, Dred Scott Decision, taxation, allegiance, treason, Washington, Lincoln, Grant, 1492, 1776, 1861, and the like. One may be said to have ac- quired the meaning of a word or phrase, i. e., the idea the symbol represents, when the meaning comes into his consciousness in response to appropriate stimulation. "Appropriate stimuli" include not only the spoken or printed word or phrase, but also other related ideas. For example, a pupil who "knows about Washington" is able to call into his consciousness several ideas about Washington whenever he sees the printed word, "Washington," or hears it spoken. He should also be able to recall ideas about Washington when he "thinks of" such related ideas as "first president of the United States," "Revolutionary War," or "Mount Vernon." A fact has been defined as "the statement of a relation between a particular concept and a general concept." 3 For the purpose of describ- ing achievement in history we may say that "a fact is the statement of a relation between two ideas." Hence "knowing a fact" may be de- scribed as "knowing the meaning of two or more words or phrases plus being aware of a relation between them." For example, the statement "Washington was the first president of the United States" expresses a fact. Knowing this fact involves being able to associate appropriate ideas with "Washington," "first," and "president of the United States" plus recognizing the relation between them, so that when "Washington" is mentioned the other two will tend to follow, or when "the first presi- dent of the United States" is mentioned "Washington" will be the response. "Knowing facts" as described in the preceding paragraph should be distinguished from the type of achievement commonly designated as "memorized facts." 4 The distinction is one of degree but certain differ- ences may be noted. (1) When a fact is simply "known" the connection between the ideas is not fixed and usually these ideas are connected with a number of other ideas. This knowledge is characterized by a wealth of associations (connections between ideas). When a fact is memorized, a particular association is singled out and made relatively strong or fixed. (2) In addition to the difference in the degree of 3 Bagley, W. C. Educational Values. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1911, p. 35. 4 "A fact known" is commonly designated as a phase of knowledge. A "memor- ized fact" is classified as a fixed association or specific habit. [61 "fixedness of the association," the memorization of a fact is usually accompanied by a tendency to crowd the ideas into the background of one's consciousness and to establish a connection between the words and other symbols used to represent them. 5 For example, a pupil who has memorized the names of the presidents of the United States and dates of their term of office, is able to recite this group of facts upon request but when doing so he may not bring into his consciousness many of the ideas that are commonly connected with either the names or the dates. In fact, a perfect recital of the names and dates does not demon- strate that the pupil "knows" the facts in the sense described in the preceding paragraph. A third type of knowledge, principles, is usually recognized. Bag- ley 6 has defined a principle as "the statement of a relation between general concepts." No sharp line of demarcation can be drawn between v facts and principles because the basis of the distinction is the degree of generalization represented by the ideas between which a relation is expressed. A statement of the causes of an event such as the Revolu- tionary War, or of the effects of an event such as the Louisiana Pur- chase would usually be listed as a general relationship, while a state- ment of the date of an event would be designated as a fact. 7 Knowledge, which is described here as consisting of ideas, facts, and principles, is used in answering "thought questions," that is ques- tions for which one does not remember ready-made answers or does not seek such answers in his text or from other sources. In other words, ideas, facts, and principles are the material out of which one constructs (thinks out) answers to "new" questions. In addition to specific habits in the form of memorized facts and the three types of knowledge (ideas, facts, and principles) achievement in history includes general patterns of conduct which are commonly designated as ideals, attitudes, interests, and the like. These controls of conduct are less tangible than the three phases of knowledge described but they represent important achievements. A restatement of the problem. This analysis of achievement in the field of history makes possible a more detailed statement of the problem. °This statement assumes that the pupil first ''knows the fact" and then memorizes it. In many cases the pupil memorizes the symbols without having very clear ideas connected with them. "Bagley, W. C. Educational Values. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1911, p. 35. 'The statement of a principle may be memorized. When this is done the meaning of the words and phrases is usually crowded into the background as in memorizing a fact. [7] The investigation concerns facts, not necessarily reduced to fixed asso- ciations, and principles. The two general questions stated on page 5 may be replaced by the following: 1. What is the judgment of a group of elementary teachers in re- gard to the dates, persons, events, s and other facts which pupils should ''know" as the result of their study of United States history in the sev- enth and eighth grades? 2. What is the judgment of a group of elementary teachers in re- gard to the thought questions that pupils should be able to answer as the result of their study of United States history in the seventh and eighth grades? 9 3. How do judgments of these teachers in regard to these objectives agree with certain determinations of objectives for United States history? The reader should note that the inquiry was restricted to ideas, facts, and principles. No attempt was made to ascertain what general patterns of conduct (ideals, interests, attitudes, and the like) pupils should acquire and there was no explicit inquiry relative to what facts should be memorized. The collection of data relative to teachers' judgments. On Octo- ber 22, 1925, the following letter and questionnaire 10 was mailed to all public school teachers in Champaign and Piatt counties of Illinois ex- cept those employed in the schools of the City of Champaign. To the Teachers of Champaign and Piatt Counties: The questions asked on this and the following pages are for the purpose of securing information on which to base a formulation of minimum essentials in United States history. Answer each question carefully because it is important that we secure the best data available. Do not write down the first answers that occur to you. Unless you are very familiar with the field of United States history you should refer to one or more ' textbooks in preparing your answers. This questionnaire is being sent to several hundred teachers and a summary of the replies will be sent to all who contribute information. You will assist us in the investigation by returning this blank promptly. A stamped envelope is enclosed. Thanking you for your cooperation, I am Very truly yours, Walter S. Monroe, Director. 8 A "date" is to be interpreted as a fact because "knowing a date" means knowing the relation between the date and some event. Similarly '"knowing"' a person or an event usually means knowing a fact. 9 A statement of the thought questions that pupils should be able to answer will by implication specify ideas, facts, and principles that they should know. 10 In the questionnaire mailed to the teachers space was provided for their replies. [8] Name Address - No. of years you have School - taught U. S. history I. In the blanks below give 20 to 25 dates in United States history which you believe children completing the seventh and eighth grades should know. Select the dates which you consider most important. II. In the blanks below give 20 to 25 specific events in United States history which you believe children completing the seventh and eighth grades should know well enough so that given the event they will be able to supply the more important details, its causes, significance, and the like. For example, if asked to tell about the Battle of New Orleans they should be able to tell in what war it occurred, the approximate date and its significance. Select the events which you consider most important. III. In the blanks below give the names of 30 to 50 persons in United States history which you believe children completing the seventh and eighth grades should know well enough so that (1) given the event with which the person was connected and his relation to it or his major accomplishments, the pupil will be able to supply the name, or (2) given the name of the person the pupil will be able to tell the thing for which he is noted. This explanation of the meaning of "know" is equivalent to saying that the pupils should be able to answer questions of the following type: "Who invented the telegraph?" "Who issued the Proclamation of Emancipation?" "Who was the first President of the United States?" "What did Columbus do?" "For what is Stephen A. Douglas noted?" Give the names which you consider most important. IV. In the blanks below give 15 to 25 miscellaneous facts in United States history which you believe children completing the seventh and eighth grades should know. Include in this list any historical facts which are not included under the heads of dates, persons, and events. Facts relating to population, the organization of the government, expenditures, places, etc., are to be listed here. V. Give below 15 thought questions in United States history which you think children completing the seventh and eighth grades should be able to answer. Note that thought questions are called for. Most questions of this kind ask the pupil to compare, give reasons why, state the effects of, explain, or discuss. However, it is not essential that these terms appear in the statement of the questions. Number of replies received. Table I gives a summary statement of the number of replies received grouped according to the experience of the teachers. There were thirty-nine teachers in elementary schools, mostly rural, who had had no previous experience. Experienced teachers in elementary schools were grouped as follows : 1 year, 2 or 3 years, 4 to 7 years, and 8 or more years. The replies received from high school teachers are tabulated separately. A study of the table reveals that a few teachers failed to answer one or more of the questions asked and also that the number of responses per question varied. The maximum and minimum number of replies for each question is shown in the table. Limitations and validity of the data. Despite certain omissions, obvious misinterpretations, and some other indications of carelessness which will be mentioned later, there was considerable evidence of thoughtful care in answering the questionnaire. Reports came indirectly of teachers working several hours on their replies. Seldom did a teacher give the exact number of items called for, but gave those that seemed [9J TABLE I. ANALYTICAL SUMMARY OF NUMBER OF REPLIES Sections of Questionnaire Experience in Years of Elementary Teachers 1 1 2-3 4-7 8 + Total of Experi- enced Groups High School Teachers I. Dates: Teachers answering. . Number of different dates Maximum number of dates by one teacher Minimum number of dates by one teacher II. Events: Teachers answering . . Number of different events Maximum number of events by one teacher Minimum number of events by one teacher III. Names: Teachers answering Number of different names Maximum number of names by one teacher Minimum number of names by one teacher IV. Miscellaneous Facts: Teachers answering . . Number of different miscellaneous facts, Maximum number of miscellaneous facts by one teacher Minimum number of miscellaneous facts by one teacher V. Thought Questions: Teachers answering . . Number of different thought questions.. Maximum number of thought questions by one teacher. . . . Minimum number of thought questions by one teacher. . . . 39 36 7 39 25 8 39 57 16 37 25 4 31 17 1 32 30 20 32 20 31 50 30 29 25 10 28 16 3 47 27 15 47 28 10 47 23 43 25 4 42 15 51 34 10 51 25 18 51 57 52 50 29 50 34 30 18 34 25 18 34 31 30 25 10 30 15 6 164 233 34 10 164 435 28 10 163 360 57 23 152 601 25 4 150 1894 18 23 25 17 23 25 20 23 50 30 22 25 12 20 21 6 [10] appropriate, frequently appending a note of explanation. Some teachers thought that only a few dates should be known, but in the judgment of others so many important events have occurred in our national life that twenty-five was an insufficient number to list. Some teachers not only gave dates but appended the corresponding events. Perhaps this is an evidence of misunderstanding, but probably it is an indication of care taken in order that the significance of the dates might not be misinter- preted. One teacher mislaid his questionnaire and wrote in for another. There was some evidence of apparent misunderstanding and lack of care in answering the questionnaire. A few teachers failed to give their names and other information with regard to themselves. Their replies were not tabulated. A few teachers gave all of the data about themselves except their years of experience teaching United States history. Their replies were tabulated with those from teachers with no experience teaching United States history. This was done on the as- sumption that a blank was intended to indicate no experience. Instead of simply listing the names of important personages one teacher phrased questions about them, often using nicknames, such as, "Who was the Little Giant?" "What is said of 'Little Mac'?" Each name referred to in this manner was identified and the data tabulated as if given in proper form. There were a few other irregularities in answering other questions. Some teachers "sandwiched" a few names among events and miscellaneous facts, and vice versa. These names, dates, events, and miscellaneous facts were sorted out and transferred to the tabulations of like data. Frequently the same fact or event was listed by some teachers as an event and by others as a miscellaneous fact. Thus, the Missouri Compromise, in the total tabulation, was mentioned as an event by 143 teachers and as a miscellaneous fact by 14 teachers. These were combined to give the Missouri Compromise a frequency of mention of 157 as an event. Similar combinations of data were made for other events. Another peculiarity of the data is that no single date or man was mentioned by all teachers. Abraham Lincoln was mentioned by 161 of the 163 elementary teachers with experience teaching United States history; George Washington by 157; and 1492 by 161 of the 164 teach- ers giving dates. This lack of unanimous mention may be accounted for in two or three ways. Perhaps it was due to carelessness. If so, there is not enough carelessness to cause serious concern. It may be that some teachers were thinking of the dates, events and so forth, which they listed as those which pupils should learn in the seventh and eighth grades rather than those which they should know at the end of [11] the eighth grade, and thus they might think that George Washington should be learned about before pupils reach the seventh grade. At any rate, this does not appear to be a source of serious error. Despite these various evidences of slight carelessness, minor errors, and discrepancies, the data appear to have been given in good faith, with commendable care, and to be a fair representation of the opinions of the teachers of Champaign and Piatt counties. Tabulation of data. In summarizing the dates, events, personages, miscellaneous facts, and thought questions listed by the teachers re- sponding to the questionnaire, the order in which they were mentioned was disregarded and only the frequency of occurrence was determined. 11 In order to facilitate interpretation the rank of several items was deter- mined from the frequency of mention. In doing this the items were .arranged in the order of descending frequency of mention. When two or more items had the same frequency the same rank was assigned to each. 12 Sources of comparative data. In an effort to determine what the objectives of United States history should be, the list of dates, names and events most frequently mentioned by the teachers of Champaign and Piatt counties are compared in the following tables with' similar lists which have been compiled. These lists and the manner in which they were secured are briefly described in the following paragraphs. 1. Bagley's Lists. 13 In determining the twenty dates of importance in United States history and their relative importance, Wooters, under the direction of Bagley, submitted fifty-two dates, ranging from 1419 to 1879, to eminent historians and other teachers of history with the request that they rank them in the order of importance. Forty-nine of "Details of the procedure employed in summarizing the thought questions are given on pages 28-34. ^This rank is the average of the rank positions occupied by the items. For ex- ample, if the two items following the sixth have the same frequency (see Table II) their rank is 7.5, the average of the rank positions 7 and 8. "See: Bagley, \V. C. "The determination of minimum essentials in elementary geog- raphy and history." Fourteenth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Company, 1915, p. 131-46. Bagley, W. C, and Rugg, H. 0. "The content of American history as taught in the seventh and eighth grades." University of Illinois Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 51, School of Education Bulletin No. 16. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1916. 59 p. (Out of print.) Marstox, L. R., McKowx, H. C, and Bagley, W. C. "A method of determining misplacements of emphasis in seventh and eighth-grade history." Seventeenth Year- book of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Company, 1918, p. 90-96. [12] the eighty-six replies received were used for the final computations of the twenty most important dates. In determining the persons most prominent in civil and military life between 1765 and 1865., Bagley analyzed twenty-five textbooks in American history and ranked the names on the basis of frequency of mention. Afterward encyclopedias and magazines were examined and the same names ranked on the basis of the frequency of mention in each. The two lists were also submitted to teachers and students of history who ranked them. 2. Tryon's List. 14 The data credited to Tryon in the following tables are taken from the report of a committee to the Department of History and Other Social Sciences of the Academies and High Schools in Relation with the University of Chicago. Tryon was chairman of the committee. The report includes lists of dates, events, and names which should be recognized as objectives in the junior and senior-high school 15 courses in American history. The lists may be considered as representing the concensus of the opinions of certain leaders in curric- ulum making in the social studies. 3. Fort Wayne List. 16 Certain dates, events, and names of persons are listed as objectives in the Fort Wayne, Indiana, course of study for United States history in the junior high school (seventh and eighth grades). These lists are taken as a sample of specifications set up by school authorities. In the lists of names, some are in bold faced type, others in light faced type. It appeared that those in bold faced type were considered the more important and since the list was rather lengthy, comparison was made only with them. Ordinarily dates and events were listed together, but in one list, 14-92 to 1816, dates were listed without corresponding events. Events were supplied for these dates and used for comparison in this study. 4. Washburne's List. 17 In attempting to determine the basic facts in history and geography, Washburne had periodicals examined for 14 See: "Progressive requirements in American history for junior and senior high schools," The School Review, 26:473-89, September, 1918. ^Comparisons are made with the junior-high school lists. "See: "Course of study, junior high school." Fort Wayne, Indiana: Board of Educa- tion, 1920, p. 69, 73, 74, 77, 78, 80. "See: Washburne, Carleton W. "Basic facts needed in history and geography; a statis- tical investigation." Twenty-Second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Bloomington, Illinois: Public School Publishing Company, 1923, p. 216-33. [13] allusions to persons, places, dates and events. In the resulting list the items were arranged according to an index number determined from the periodicals and the dates of the issues read. Since few dates and events appear in the published list, Washburne's data have been used only in the case of names. In doing this those names were selected from the total list which are of importance in American history and ranked on the basis of Washburne's ratings. Dates. The fifty-two dates mentioned most frequently by 164 ele- mentary teachers with experience in teaching United States history are given in Table II. 1S Of the first fifty-two dates as ranked by frequency of mention by 164 elementary teachers of Champaign and Piatt coun- ties with experience teaching United States History, 1492 ranks first with a frequency of mention of 161 and also appears in Tryon's list and in the Fort Wayne, Indiana. Course of Study; 1803 ranks third with a frequency of mention of 133 and appears in Tryon's list but not in the Fort Wayne Course of Study, and so forth. The frequency of mention decreases rapidly as one reads down the list, and in order to secure a list of fifty dates it was necessary to include one that was mentioned only fifteen times by this group of 164 teachers. 19 The rapid decrease in frequency indicates that with the exception of a few dates near the top of the table (1492. 1776, 1803. 1607, 1812, 1620, etc.) the teachers differ widely in their judgments concerning the 25 most impor- tant dates in United States history. This conclusion is indicated also by the fact that 233 different dates were mentioned, although the highest number given by any one teacher was 34. The last two columns of Table II furnish a comparison with Tryon's list 20 and the Fort Wayne list. 21 Of the fifty-two dates, eighteen do not appear in the former and nineteen are not found in the latter. Hence the general statement can be made that nearly two-thirds of the "By reference to Table I it will be seen that 39 teachers of no experience and 23 high school teachers also answered the question relative to important dates. After an analysis of the total data collected it was decided to omit the data supplied by these teachers from this report. "Since three dates had this frequency, the list was extended to include a total of 52 dates. 2,; Tryon's list is found in: ''Progressive requirements in American history for junior and senior high schools," School Review, 26:473-89, September, 1918. Fifty-one dates are given. "The Fort Wayne, Indiana, Course of Study gives 62 dates for the seventh and eighth grades. See: "Course of study, junior high school." Fort Wayne. Indiana: Board of Educa- tion, 1920, p. 73-74, 78. [ 14] 1) a >^ > tn O X X X X XX X X X XX X x * CO "a o >> i* H XX X XX XX X X X X X X CO CD P on — < oo v> cn r-^ oo r-~ oo oo CN OO CN rf 1 1 Tf NO ON OO NO OO OO VI OO OO r^ © on r^ co NO NO © © Tf OO OO ON V> NO V) NO 1 OO ON i— I CO V) -f vi so so v, so © OO OO OO Tf V) ON Rank V> vi cscstNnco V, V) CN co ■* ■>*" NO CO co CO CO CO v> lo r~- oo On On — * CO CO co co "^ V) u-i vi V> CN CO CO NO NO V) Vl so so On — i t— i — * if ii VI Vl VI u c V) no r-» r-- on o V> W-| V) V, — 1—1 CO Tf Tf no r^ oo On © i-< CN CO if Vi SO CN CN CN CN CN CN u c