C-o Yy tc e^e- o'o oJ-| li le. 0 V 3 / J G.v\CK Tfie. [/ uay ev£>-^y q.^* jL| Ji pi&ds. — . REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS “ T '>* • SPECIAL COMMITTEE of The Chicago Association of*Comm«-ce I on the CONDITIONS AND AFFAIRS of the UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS Urbana-Champaign, III. I Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Alternates https://archive.org/details/reportrecommendaOOchic j i c T^Gu-Tio mi Y OUR committee, appointed to inspect the conditions and affairs of the University of Illinois and lend the sup- port of the Association to the budget to be laid before the legislature for its maintenance and development, begs leave to report as follows : We have examined into the affairs of the University as fully and carefully as time and opportunity would permit and have given consideration to its present condition and fu- ture needs. Two members of your committee have visited the institution and have consulted with various officers and mem- bers of its staff. We have also examined the annual report of the Comptroller for the year ending June 30, 1920, and several statements issued by the President of the University describing its present difficulties and setting forth the finan- cial plan for the coming biennium. Like all citizens of Illinois who have not been previ- ously acquainted with the University, we have been very greatly impressed both by the magnitude of the institution and the diverse character and excellence of the services which it is rendering the people of the State. It is a matter of surprise to us that so many of our fellow citizens are but little, if at all, acquainted with the greatness of this institution, and its high standing among the educational and scientific insti- tutions not only of the country, but of the world. Some means should be devised to bring the University before the people so frequently that at least a majority of our fellow citizens would have some adequate idea of what it is and what it does. For, as a former Governor once said, “The University is not merely a center of instruction where young men and women may prepare themselves for efficient citizenship, but it is also an important center for scientific investigation, in which sig- nificant and far-reaching contributions are constantly made towards the solution of problems concerning our agriculture, manufactures, and commerce.’ ’ He might have added also towards the solution of some of our complex legislative and social problems. 3 Needless to say, an institution of the extent and diverse activity of a modern university, especially a state university, requires large and constantly increasing* funds to prosecute its work. This is true not only because the number of young men and women seeking an education at the University is constantly increasing with population, but perhaps in a larger measure because the increasing complexity of the life of the State throws upon the University a demand for investigation into an increasing and multiferious complexity of technical, economic and social problems. Practically every interest of the State is calling upon the University for the solution of problems whose solution adds to the general welfare. As will > be indicated later, the solution of these problems returns to the State, even from an economic point of view, far more than their investigation costs, so that money expended on the re- ?' search side of the institution is properly regarded as an in- vestment yielding direct returns. It goes without saying that the training of our men and women is an investment of even a more important character although its economic returns are less direct. The Physical University Considered as a physical plant, the University of Illinois has two great divisions. The main University is located at Urbana on the border line between that city and Champaign, so that it is equally well described as being located for rail- road, telegraph, and express purposes, at either Urbana or Champaign. The other great division of the University, com- prising the College of Medicine, the College of Dentistry, and the School of Pharmacy, is located in Chicago in the neigh- borhood of the Cook County Hospital. At Urbana the University has 60 buildings, 230 acres in its campus, and 991 acres in its farms. A considerable por- * tion of the campus proper is taken up with experimental plots in agriculture, including floriculture, forestry, and other sub-divisions. As the University is in the heart of the corn belt, it is favorably situated for practical experimentation and demonstration of agricultural problems relating to corn pro- duction, but its agricultural work extends to every part of the State and to every large agricultural interest. When we 4 remember that agriculturally Illinois is more diverse than almost any other state of the Mississippi Valley, we appre- ciate the multitude of lines of experiment which the College of Agriculture and its Experiment Station must conduct. Among the principal buildings are the Physics Labora- tory, the Chemistry Laboratory, the Natural History Hall, the College of Commerce Building, the Educational Building, Engineering Hall, Ceramics Building, Laboratories of Me- chanical and Electrical Engineering, the Locomotive Testing Laboratory, the Transportation Building, the Agricultural Building, the Law Building, the Smith-Memorial Hall of Music and the Armory — the latter one of the largest and most com- plete buildings of its kind in the United States. A further word about the Militiary Department may not be out of place. It is perhaps the largest and most important university military organization in the country. At present the work requires 103 cadet officers, and 14 United States Army officers, together with 100 enlisted men. Training is given to about 2,700 young men at the present time. Besides the training in infantry, training is also given in cavalry, ar- tillery, signal corps, engineering corps, and aeronautics. According to the Report of the Comptroller of the Uni- versity for the year ending June 30, 1920, the original cost of the land owned by the University is $1,079,315, and the original cost of the buildings, including cost of additions, is $5,295,785. The present value of the land and buildings is probably much greater. Some idea of the extent of the physical plant may be gained from the statement that the University supplies its own heat, light, steam, electricity, and water. The Divisions and Work of the University The work of the University may be divided into four or five different divisions, i. e., the usual under-graduate college teaching, although in many more subjects than some of the older institutions treat; the graduate work of training new faculty and executive staff, investigation and research, and extension work of various kinds. 5 As a teaching institution the University has eight col- leges and four schools and several bureaus and divisions. The colleges are the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, the College of Agriculture, the College of Engineering, the College of Commerce, the College of Education, the College of Law, the College of Medicine which is in Chicago, and the College of Dentistry also in Chicago. The schools are the School of Library Science, the School of Music, the School of Pharmacy in Chicago, and the Graduate School. The bureaus and divisions are Military, Physical Education, and the Stu- dent Health Service. The University has museums of Classical Art, Arch- aeology, European Culture, Natural History, and Oriental History, but it lias no building in which these collections can be displayed. The University as a Public Service Institution Research and extension work are classed under this head. Research is conducted through three organizations, the Grad- uate School, the Engineering Experiment Station, and the Agricultural Experiment Station. The Graduate School is an organization of all departments of the University to train in- vestigators and to conduct research in every line. The Agri- cultural Experiment Station is specifically devoted to agricul- ture, and its great work is too well known to need descrip- tion. The Engineering Experiment Station was the first of the kind in the country, and its investigations are known for their great value. The extension work of the University is limited but im- portant. Members of the staff are called on to go to all parts of the State many times a year, and several men are going about for this purpose practically all the time. Staff and Students The total number of people required for the operation of the University, including the teaching and research staff, the administrative staff, the clerical staff, and employees of all kind, is 1,331. The educational staff numbers 861. The gross, enrollment of the University for the academic year 1919-1920,. including the summer session, was 9,208. The gross enroll- ment for the current academic year will he over 10,000, includ- ing the summer session. The number present and seeking and receiving instruction in November of 1920 at one time, not including the summer session, was 8,262. Of these some 2,400 were in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences; 1,700 in the College of Commerce; 1,600 in the College of Engineer- ing; 1,100 in the College of Agriculture; 750 in the Chicago Departments, and the rest in smaller groups in the other col- leges and schools. Comparison With Other Institutions The important part of the University is, of course, its men and women. In these days good teaching and research require more than ever expensive equipment. Ten years ago the Association of Commerce gave its influence to the promotion of the interests of the University so powerfully that the institution received a great impetus in the improve- ment of its equipment and in the increase of its operating in- come. At that time our institution was inferior to its leading competitors, both in its physical equipment and the means at its command for employing a proper staff. Although much has been accomplished in the intervening period, other insti- tutions have also forged ahead, and the relative situation of our State institution today is not much improved over what it was eleven years ago. The needs of the development of the University have gone forward in the past decade by leaps and bounds. It is important, therefore, to compare the pres- ent status of the University of Illinois in certain respects with that of some of her sister institutions. The heart of an educational institution is its library. In this respect the University of Illinois is much below the posi- tion which it should occupy. It must be remembered that the main University is down in the country where it is not possible for students and faculty to have access to great col- lections of books other than those which the University itself possesses. Comparative figures upon this subject are as fol- lows : Total vols. within easy Name of reach, incl. vols. in Vols. in Univ. Institution Univ. Lib. Library Columbia 5,780,000 709,849 Harvard 4,312,000 1,940,600* Chicago 2,477,500 570,849 Pennsylvania 2,265,500 481,190 Yale 1,425,500 1,253,830 California 1,039,000 392,682 Johns Hopkins 1,010,000 216,137 Minnesota 983,000 280,000 Michigan 885,000 413,666 Wisconsin 743,000 481,3951 Cornell 630,000 603,100 Princeton 532,000 429,286 Illinois 462,000 (Urbana only) 418,949 * Includes volumes and pamphlets in all departments. 1 Includes Wisconsin State Hist. Library in same build- ing. The per capita student investment in buildings in several institutions is shown in the following table, and again it ap- pears that Illinois is low, showing that the expense of main- taining the University of Illinois is, from this point of view, considerably less than that of other institutions: Cost of Buildings, June 30, 1920, per Head of Student Enroll- ment November 1, 1920 University of Minnesota $832 ^University of Iowa 747 University of Wisconsin 719 ^University of Michigan 708 University of Illinois 642 tUniversity of Ohio 427 * Agricultural College not included. t Agricultural Experiment Station not included. Per Capita Burden on the People for the Support of Universities The following table shows the University income for 1920-21 per head of population for several states, the 1920 Census figures being taken for population : 8 University Agric. Coll. Total Wisconsin $1.14 $1.14 Minnesota 1.38 1.38 Iowa 77 $0.55 1.32 Michigan 80 .26 1.06 Ohio 30 .25 .55 Indiana 22 .26 .48 Illinois 39 .39 That is to say, Michigan contributes more than twice as much, Wisconsin practically three times as much, and Min- nesota and Iowa over three times as much per head as do the people of Illinois for the maintenance of the various lines of work done at our State University. In Michigan, Iowa, and Indiana the agricultural courses are given at separate insti- tutions. In Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Illinois they are given at the same place as the rest of the university work. In Ohio state appropriations to maintain the same work as is done at the University of Illinois are made to three institutions besides that at Columbus, namely, Ohio University at Athens, Miami University at Oxford, and the Agricultural Experiment Station at Wooster. In cases where the institutions are sepa- rate, appropriations to them are combined in order to make a fair comparison with Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Illinois. Income and Expenditures of the University Largely as a result of the efforts of the Association of Commerce, the legislature passed in 1911 an Act whereby a tax of one mill on the assessed valuation of the taxable property of the State was assessed for University appropria- tions. This tax was reduced to two-thirds of a mill by amend- ment of the law in 1919. It was naturally supposed that such a tax would yield an increasing income from year to year as the wealth and assessed value of the property of the State in- creased. As a matter of fact, such has not been the case. The receipts of the University mill tax fund increased very much more slowly than either population or wealth. The an- nual receipts for the University from the mill tax fund were as follows: 9 1909- 10 ] $1,151,7500 1910- 11 l 1,151,750 [Direct appropriations | 1,692,150 f out of Revenue J 1,692,150 J ^ . } 2,250,000 1914- 15 } 2,250,000 1915- 16 2,424,870.95 1916- 17 2,575,129.05 1917- 18 2,338,263.58 1918- 19 2,341,933.77 1919- 20 } 2,500,000 1920- 21 2,500,000 Since 1911 the income from the mill tax for operation has increased only about 11 per cent. In the meantime the num- ber of students actually present and receiving instruction at one time has increased more than 100 per cent. Meanwhile, the prices of everything have practically doubled. In other words, the operating income for the University from the mill tax has increased only about one-tenth as much as the num- ber of the student body, and the cost of equipment and sup- plies has in the meantime increased 100 per cent. The gross income of the University includes, however, not only receipts from the mill tax fund or State taxes, but also certain items from the United States, from student fees, and from sales and gifts. The University received last year (1919-20) from the Federal Government $313,527. This in- cludes the University’s share of appropriations made by Con- gress for the promotion of agriculture and vocational edu- cation, $261,000 of the whole going to the former account. This money, is therefore, not available for the ordinary work of the University. From student fees the University collected in the last fiscal year $353,683. From sales and miscellaneous sources, most of the proceeds going into the revolving funds mainly for the commercial departments of the College of Agricul- ture, $377,500 were collected. 10 In addition to the mill tax appropriation the last legis- lature appropriated to the University a certain snm outside of the mill tax for building purposes. For a clinical labora- tory at the College of Medicine $300,000 was given and for cavalry stables at Urbana, $25,000. The total income, therefore, of the University from all sources for all purposes for the year ending June 30, 1920, was $3,916,249. The Business Organization of the University Business men are inclined to raise questions about the efficiency of the business organization and methods of educa- tional institutions. We have examined into the business or- -f ganization of the University of Illinois. At the head is the Comptroller of the University. Under him is an Assistant Comptroller, a Bursar, an Auditor, and a Purchasing Agent. Each of the three latter has assistants, with the necessary number of clerks, stenographers, and bookkeepers, the total number in the staff being thirty-six. In addition, there is a Treasurer appointed by the Board of Trustees, and recently the office of Superintendent of Business Operations has been created, the duty of the incumbent being to keep the Presi- dent informed on the efficiency of the business operations of all departments of the University. All expenditures are made on requisitions duly approved by several officers; all purchases are made through the Pur- chasing Agent, standard articles largely in use being bought in quantities, and purchases exceeding $100 are let by con- l tract after competition. Such articles as require expert judgment are bought by or on advice of the experts of the University, acting as agents of the Purchasing Agent and the f Comptroller, under regular procedure and due authority. Monthly reports are made by the Comptroller and the Treas- urer, and quarterly financial reports are published in the minutes of the Board of Trustees. Quarterly audits are also made by a Chicago firm of accountants. The Comptroller of the University is himself a Certified Public Accountant. The rules of the Board of Trustees regulating expenditures have 11 been examined by ns and we think that these and the organi- zation are adequate to insure careful expenditure and to pre- vent waste and inefficient operation. All employees who han- dle mony are under bond. Present Conditions at the University The difficulties under which the University is laboring in carrying on its work have been set forth in circulars issued by the President of the University during the past twelve months. In these circulars attention is called particularly to the following points: * Two years ago a building was erected for the College of Education. Owing to the lack of funds it has not been . equipped and a staff has not been employed. Salaries have been and are in many cases too small, so that it has been difficult and at times impossible to secure properly qualified teachers. In the meantime, the research work in agriculture, engi- neering, and other lines has been seriously curtailed. It should be remembered in this connection that the contribu- tions made directly to the people through its research un- doubtedly are many fold the total appropriations which the University has received from its establishment. Only recent- ly was the University able to announce that it had devel- oped a new variety of wheat which has, on a five-year aver- age, outyielded other varieties by six bushels to the acre. When we remember that nearly two and a half million acres £ were planted to wheat in Illinois last year, we can get some idea of what this means to the farmers of this State. * The extension Avork of the University has also been di- minished. Classes are too large to teach properly. This fall there Avere being conducted 838 classes, each larger than the stand- ard number of 25. Of the total, 357 had in them 35 students enrolled and 135 had in them 50 each. 12 The Chicago Departments Probably few members of the Association and undoubt- edly a still smaller proportion of the citizens of Chicago know that an important part of the work of the University is car- ried on in the city of Chicago. As already stated, this is the work in medicine, dentistry, and pharmacy. But it is con- ducted under conditions which make it impossible for the men in charge to do their best, and with a lack of buildings and other equipment which have made it impossible for the ^ University in its medical and dental departments to take a place in the front rank of institutions doing such work. The buildings used by the College of Medicine and the College of 'f Dentistry are old and out of date, expensive to maintain, hard to keep clean, and in a large measure unsuited to the work. The opportunity for the promotion of the welfare of the people of the State in matters of health and sanitation is practically unlimited. The means provided to take advan- tage of that opportunity are pitiful. The equipment available for the first two years of work of the medical courses are fair- ly good, and the staff for this scientific work is of a high order. The equipment for the clinical work in medicine is wholly lacking, and the University has to depend upon facili- ties put at its disposal by members of its clinical faculty who have connections with hospitals in the city and who in return for their connection with the College place these hospital facilities at its disposal. The State, through its University, l should own and control its own hospitals. Unless immediate steps are taken to supply the proper clinical facilities to the College of Medicine of the University of Illinois and to supply 1 better facilities for its College of Dentistry, the University may as well close those departments. Fortunately, for the good name of the State, and its educational interest in medi- cine and dentistry, the Department of Public Welfare of the State saw the opportunity to promote the health and wel- fare of the people by establishing in co-operation with the University a great group of State hospitals. An arrangement 13 was made between the Department of Public Welfare and the University whereby the Department is to erect a group of hospitals in Chicago which offer clinical facilities to the Uni- versity College of Medicine, while the University is to erect adjacent thereto and on State land research laboratories, li- braries, and classrooms to be used and operated in connec- tion with the clinical hospitals. It is one of the greatest plans ever conceived for medical education and research in the pro- motion of public health. The attention of every citizen of Chicago should be directed to this great project which is de- scribed in some detail by the Dean of the College of Medi- cine and the Director of Public Welfare in a recent number of The Modern Hospital. Land has been purchased and the foundations laid for several of these buildings. The advance in the cost of construction has made it impossible to finish those projected for this biennium. The project will require for its completion appropriations aggregating $2,500,000, and the budgets of the Department of Public Welfare and the University will make provision for further work. The mem- bers of this Association should acquaint themselves with this project and lend it their support. Legislative Budget To meet the needs of the University, the Board of Trus- tees has decided to lay before the legislature a budget calling for $5,250,000 a year from the State for all purposes. The Trustees propose that $4,000,000 per year be appropriated for operation, maintenance, equipment, and certain extensions, $2,500,000 of which will come from the existing two-thirds of a mill tax and $1,500,000 per year from general revenue. They further propose an appropriation of $250,000 a year for each year of the biennium for the specific purpose of start- ing a new group of agricultural buildings, and a further ap- propriation of $1,000,000 per year during the next biennium for other buildings that should be started within that period to meet the University’s growing needs. 14 Tn addition to the foregoing the Board of Trustees will ask for legislation changing somewhat the present financial policy with reference to the University. In the first place, it will request that the tax rate he made one mill on the dollar of assessed valuation as it used to he instead of two-thirds of a mill as at present. If this is done, the annual income from that source will he approximately $4,000,000, the amount the Trustees are requesting for operation and maintenance for each year of the next biennium. In order to make it possible for the University to have a continuous policy with reference to building, the Board will ask the legislature to pass an additional tax levy of one- fourth of a mill, which as above stated, is to be sought for the next two years through specific appropriations for that purpose, to provide the $1,000,000 per year for the building needs of the University. Your Committee’s Recommendations The most careful study which we have been able to give this whole matter convinces ns that conditions at the Uni- versity are far short of what they should be because of in- adequate financial support. We believe that the requests for appropriations and changes in the mill tax law which the Board has decided to lay before the legislature are reasonable and should be granted. We are of the opinion that the amount of money asked for is reasonable, and can be readily justified. It is considerably below that which is being requested by the universities of several other states, whose student enrollments are less than that of Illinois. The sum in the aggregate is not large for a state of the population and wealth of Illinois. The proposed budget calls for an appropriation of $4,000,000 per year for operation, maintenance, etc., as against $2,500,000 now secured, an increase of only 60 per cent instead of the large amount which the doubling of the student body and the reduced purchasing power of the dollar would seem to call for. 15 We are informed that this moderate increase has been asked because of the anticipation of a gradual lowering of inflated values and reduction of the cost of living. The larger part of the money for operation will go into wages and salaries of new and existing positions, and for supplies, and a 60 per cent increase for these purposes seems not unreasonable. Your committee, therefore, recommends that The Chicago Association of Commerce again take active part before the appropriations committees of the legislature in furthering the interests of the University by urging that the financial plan of the Trustees be adopted as submitted. (Signed) WILLIAM P. SIDLEY, Chairman, AUGUSTUS S. PEABODY, C. M. MODERWELL, FREDERICK H. SCOTT. Approved March 4, 192.1 Executive Committee The Chicago Association of Commerce