1 I B R.AR.Y OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS M- U -t-> O C PH PU si 8 ? 8 fe- S ^ E c g co ~ I^t^OilCOO 00-*00 OS OS CN 00 CO a CNCN CO CNCO "tfCOCOCNIN (NCMcNCNIN CN CO IN i I ^H CN O ^^ CNCO CO Q (NiOCO -CNt~ -O5 !-- mcNO! COO 00 i-H O O O5 l>- >O t-ooc Pg- CMCOCN -COCO -CN -! -od -06 -osoooo i^oo oo IN -CNCN i-l -^1 00 Q oo oo -oooo aot~ -oo oot- 00 -H - _ _ _ coo _ R. CO -CO CO -OOO o o -oo op g f. a ., OCOfSiOOO-COCDc. O.J3 gt^cO -IO^H t-l>-00 'O OCO -O! -"-i fr< " n.t-00 't^oo t^oot^ '00 - -H i-IWO - - _ CNCO COCOCO -CN CNCO H-*"" -O Q OCO COCO E"^ R.COCOCOCOCO co -co -CN -COCNCNCO 0000050000 O5 -OS -O5 O i 7T'?9?? o 1^1 cocof^coop co-gj-H-^oo oc St^oooooo ooooooScN SCN -2 22 o'o'o'o 'o'o'o'o'o "o'o'o'o'o "o'o'o'o'o o o 5 s ss < 1949} YIELDS OF CORN HYBRIDS HARVESTED FOR SILAGE 381 Small differences in protein occurred in individual entries, but there appeared to be no consistent differences between the entries (Table 4) . Protein values in 1942 were lower than in the following seasons. These lower values may have been due partly to seasonal differences, tho it is probable that the lower fertility level of the 1942 field was an important factor. Two other factors that affect the protein content of corn forage are the stage of development reached by the ears when the forage is harvested and the proportion of ears in the forage. DRY MATTER IN FORAGE BEST INDEX TO HARVEST STAGE In general, the higher the dry-matter content of the corn crop the more advanced the crop and the higher the test weight of the grain per bushel and, consequently, the higher the weight of 500 kernels. For example, the 1943 crop had the highest dry-matter content (average of 30.3 percent, Table 3) ; the average test weight of the grain was high, and the weight of 500 kernels was high (Table 2). In 1945 the crop was harvested when the average dry-matter content was only 25.5 per cent; and the test weight per bushel and the weight of 500 kernels (Table 2) were much lower than in 1943. It is not always true, however, that the dry-matter content of the crop indicates the relative development of the grain. In three seasons, 1942, 1945, and 1946, the average dry-matter content of the crop at harvest was very similar, being 26.0, 25.5, and 26.9 percent respectively (Table 3) ; but the test weight of the grain and the weight of an equal number of kernels was much smaller in 1945 than in the other two years (Table 2). This observation gives additional support to the recommendation made in previous publications of this Station (Bul- letins 391 and 494) that a determination of the dry-matter content of the forage is a better index of the proper harvest stage than is an estimate of the condition of the ears. Leaves are best guide to harvest stage. A study of the dry- matter content of the ear, stalk, and leaf portions of the corn crop showed that when corn is grown under soil and climatic conditions such as those at Urbana, the dry-matter content of the leaves is a good guide to the best time to harvest the crop. These findings confirm those previously reported in Bulletin 494. The most reliable guide, of course, is a determination of the dry-matter content of the entire crop. Such a determination indicates with a high degree of certainty 382 BULLETIN No. 533 [April, whether a crop harvested at a given stage will make silage that will keep well. In most seasons the leaves and crop had nearly the same average dry-matter content (Table 3). The stalks had a considerably lower percentage of dry matter than the leaves, while the ears had a con- siderably higher percentage. These relationships held good for most of the 180 individual determinations and for the averages of the 60 entries. They may not hold good, however, when the dry matter of the crop rises to 35 percent or more, for under such conditions the leaves dry rapidly and may not form a good index to the condition of the crop as a whole. This fact was pointed out in Bulletin 494. RATINGS OF TWENTY-SIX HYBRIDS The final evaluation of a hybrid requires several years' tests and is dependent on many characteristics. Also, .because of possible year- Table 5. Ratings of Corn Hybrids Tested for Their Ability to Produce Forage for Silage Rank in Ratings for Number eneral Entry perform- ance 8 Yield of forage Erect plants Proportion of grain in forage of years grown 1 Illinois 206 4 10 7 6 2 Illinois 972A-1 5 8 1 3 Illinois 863 1 14 14 4 4 U. S. 13 15 7 3 7 5 Illinois 200 7 7 11 5 5 Illinois 713 10 4 10 4 7 Illinois 877 3 15 2 7 Illinois 247-1 6 12 1 7 Illinois 246 19 5 1 1 10 Illinois 273 25 1 2 1 11 Illinois 972-2 19 5 1 12 Illinois 201 22 9 4 5 12 Illinois 247 24 3 o 2 14 Illinois 801 2 11 26 1 15 Illinois 784 8 15 21 7 15 Illinois 838 10 13 20 4 17 Illinois 126 16 16 13 3 18 Illinois 21 21 2 16 19 Illinois 804 13 18 17 3 20 Illinois 448 12 12 22 7 21 Illinois 972. .. . 23 19 8 1 22 Illinois 21 19(W) 9 25 2 23 Illinois 2077 (W) 17 16 18 3 24 Illinois 246A-1 14 22 1 25 Illinois 2059 (W) 18 19 2 26 Illinois 855 26 5 24 1 a The ranking of each hybrid is calculated by allowing 40 percent for its yield-of-forage rating, 20 percent for its erect-plant rating, and 40 percent for proportion-of-grain rating. In the absence of a rating for erect plants, a value of 50 percent was assigned to each of the other ratings. 1949} YIELDS OF CORN HYBRIDS HARVESTED FOR SILAGE 383 to-year differences in the condition of the seedbed, planting rate, and cultivation, as well as in weather, insect pests, and diseases, a valid comparison of different hybrids is possible only when they are grown in the same seasons. And such a comparison must be based on a statistical analysis of the significance of the yields. Final judgment must take into account all the various qualities and values discussed in the preceding sections. Main considerations, however, are: (1) yield of forage; (2) proportion of erect plants; (3) proportion of ears; (4) ability to mature grain; and (5) protein content of the forage. The summarized ratings given in Table 5 are based on only three of the above measurements: forage yields, percentage of erect plants, and proportion of ears in the forage. Ability to mature the grain is not included in the table as a rating because it is closely associated with the proportion of ears in the forage, and proportion of ears is a more exact measurement. A rating for protein content is also omitted because the differences in the protein contents of the hybrids tested were so small that a rating based on such differences would be unfair. The entries are arranged in Table 5 in the order of their rating for general performance, the one having the best all-round perform- ance, Illinois 206, being given first place. In several instances two or more hybrids have equal numerical ratings, as for example, Illinois 200 and Illinois 713. But since Illinois 200 was entered in the tests for five years, it is given precedence over Illinois 713, which was grown only four years. (Note that ratings of ten of the entries are based on the tests reported in Bulletin 494 as well as on the trials reported in this bulletin.) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS For five seasons, 1942 thru 1946, corn hybrids were tested for their ability to produce forage for silage. The hybrids were grown at Urbana, only those that had shown good performance in grain tests being chosen for the forage tests. The yields were determined by two methods. The first consisted of field sampling: the plants in measured rows were counted and a given proportion of them harvested. The weight and dry-matter con- tent of the ear, stalk, and leaf portions of these samples were de- termined. The second method consisted of weighing and sampling the completely harvested crop from measured areas of each entry. The yields were calculated from the weight of the forage and the dry-matter content of the samples. The average results of the two methods were 384 BULLETIN No. 533 in close agreement, a statistical study of the yields determined by the two methods showing that the field sampling of standing drilled corn is as dependable a means of arriving at yields as the weighing and sampling of a completely harvested crop. All of the hybrids entered in the tests proved to be high producers of forage and were satisfactory for silage purposes. Some matured slightly later than others. The ability to mature grain is a desirable characteristic if the crop that is left after silos have been filled is to be harvested for grain. Good lodging resistance (ability of the plants to stand erect) is also ..an essential characteristic of good silage corn. Resistance to lodging was satisfactory in all entries except Illinois 863 and 972. In proportion of ears, the various entries differed somewhat from season to season. A high proportion of ears is an advantage because the grain has greater feeding value than the leaves and stalks. The stage of development at harvest, as shown by the percentage of dry matter in the forage, was found to be one of the most important determinants of the ear content of the forage. The relationship be- tween stage of development at harvest and ear content of forage was fairly close. Early-maturing hybrids contained a higher percentage of ears at harvest than later-maturing hybrids. This study furnishes additional evidence that the leaf portion of corn forage at the silage stage has a dry-matter content nearly the same as that of the entire crop. Hence a dry-matter test of the leaves may be used as an index of the suitability of the crop for silage harvest. The protein content of the forage varied from season to season, but none of the hybrids in the trials appeared superior to others in this component. Small differences in yield are usually not significant, and the reader is urged to keep this in mind when studying the tables showing yields. 60504-4940690 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-URBANA Q.6307IL6B C002 BULLETIN. URBANA 529-5401948-50 30112019529350