/•^^ ^^r.^ •«&: -^ c] KgarelTM, illustrated by the great Councils of Nice, Constantinople, Ephesus, and Chalcedon? In each of these, appeal was made to the sayings and writings of the old doctors % in order to clear up what was the mind of the Church from the beginning. There is no framing ex cathedra as by some immediate inspiration and living power. " After that," says Vincentius Lerinensis, •» Jude 3. It is uufortunate, that in our version the full meaning of i(pdTra^, literally " upon once," " once only," " once for aU," has not been given. «= Acts xs. 27. •1 Gal. i. 8, 9. Vide Vincentius Lei-inensis' instructive comment on these verses in the 8th and 9th chapters of his Commonitory. " These precepts," says he, " which are set down against changing the faith, are commanded to all ages ; wherefore to preach unto Christian Catholic men beside that which they have received never was lawful, no where is laAvful, never shall be lawful. He crieth out, and again and again crieth out, in his Epistles, to all men, to all times, to all places, that vessel of election, that Master of the Gentiles, that trumpet of the Apostles, that herald of the earth, that seer of the things of Heaven, that whosoever preacheth a new doctrine is to be acciu'sed. And, on the contrai-y part, certain cry out, Cast away your old faith, your forefathers' laws, yoiu' elders' trust committed to you, and receive after all what things ? I tremble to utter them, so proud and presmnptuous are they." The principle here laid down was that on which the Ancient Church acted, and thus she fulfilled the great purpose for which she was formed, the maintenance of one immutable Faith in its integrity. The present practice is to pronounce as necessai'y to be believed whatever a sufficiently large public opinion demands. See note on the subject of the Immaculate Conception. P. 43. « For the way in which Rome treats the Fathers, vide Index Expurgatorius, Dissuasive, p. 2. 1. 1. §. 0. Stillingfleet, Grounds, 1. s. 19. Newman on Roman- ism, Lect. 2. 40 PllINCIPLE OF INNOVATION. commenting on the Council of Ephesus, " we admired and highly commended the great humility and holiness of the Council, that so many Priests, almost the greater part of whom were Metropolitans, of such condition, of such learning, that they were almost all sufficient to have dis- puted concerning doctrines, and whose very assembling might therefore seem enough to have emboldened them to presume and determine somewhat of themselves, yet they innovated in nothing, aiTOgated nothing to themselves; but above all things were most careful not to deliver any thing unto posterity which they also had not received from their forefathers, not only disposing well of the business then present, but leaving an example to posterity, namely, how they in like manner should reverence the doctrines of sacred antiquity, but condemn the inventions of profane novelty." Would God that the Mediaeval Church had fol- lowed that godly rule and example. The sharp severe measure of sti-iking off at a blow all " profane novelties," as Vincent indignantly termed them, " new inventions," as Mr. Faber approvingly entitles them, and returning to " the docti'ines of sacred antiquity," would not then have been needed in the sixteenth century. III. Are you really prepared to worship the Blessed Virgin Mary ? I use the word uorship deliberately, for it is the only word which is truthful. Else what mean not only the foreign practices prayers and sennons, which, as has been shewn by the previous letters, encourage the laity in making St. Mary the centre of their religious system '^, but also the dogmatic and devotional expressions accepted into f The foUowiug conversation took place between the wi-iter and an old woman in Rome last year. Q. ' Do you pray to la Santissima Madonna ?* A. with a smile of pity, ' Of coiu-se.' ' Do yoii make any tlifference in your prayers addi-essed to her and to Jesus Christ ?' ' Of course not.' ' "Which do you pray most to ?' ' La Santissima Madonna.' ' "Why ?' ' Because I am a woman, and so I pray to Her ; you are a man, so you pray to Him.' The men in Italy do not pray. Their faith has been overtaxed, and they have, in the middle classes, in numberless cases, cast away belief. WORSHIP OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN. 41 the public offices, and when used by individuals, approved by authority ? Wliat, for example, is the meaning of the " Psalter of the Blessed Virgin, compiled by the Seraphic Doctor St. Bonaventura, Bishop of Alba, and Presbyter Cardinal of the Holy Church of Rome," of whom Pope Sixtus declared, when he canonized him in 1482, " that he so wrote on divine subjects, that the Holy Spirit seems tohave spoken in him ?" And his version of the Te Deum, in which we read, " We praise Thee, O Lady, we acknowledge Thee Mary the Virgin : all the earth shall worship Thee, the Spouse of the Eternal Father. Holy, holy, holy, Mary, Mother of God and Virgin ! O Lady, save Thy people ! Let Thy great mercy be with us, because we do put our trust in Thee, O A'^irgin Mary ! in Thee, sweet Mary, do we put our trust, defend Thou us eternally.'"' And his Litany, in which it is prayed, " Spare us. Good Lady !" " Good Lady, deliver us !" " We sinners do beseech Thee to hear us. Good Lady ?" Look again to the saying of Bernardinus Sennensis, who was canonized by Nicholas V. in the year 1450: "Mary has done more for_God, than God has for man, so that thus on account of the Blessed Virgin, whom nevertheless He made, God is in a certain manner under greater obli- gations to us than man to Him." Alphonso Liguori was canonized only twelve years ago; his words are, "All is subject to Mary, even God Himself." It would be endless to y,. /(.-^ enumerate such passages^, which those who have visited the v ^'~'. g For fui'ther examples, vide supra, Letter VI. The excess to which this adoration has heen caxi'ied by the new School of the Oratoiians is well known. ' ■ - '' ^ >' "• ' It was hinted in Mr. Newman's published letter to Mr. Faber, in which he ^--^'v.-*^,^^ signed himself, ' Yom-s in St. Mary and St. Philip.' It is brought out clearly '- ^'-^^tf- in Mr. Faber's writings. The following extracts ai'e taken from his hymns. '^ /^i-^t. The capital letters are Mr. Faber's. Li- ri^^,-^' " Mary, one gift I beg of Thee, My soul from sin and sorrow free ! Direct my wandering feet aright. And be Thyself mine own ti-ue light ! Oh, Mai7, when I come to die. Be Thou, Thy Spouse, and Jesus nigh ! 42 INTERCESSION OF SS. MARY AND JOSEPH. churches near Rome and Naples know well, still breathe the spirit of the Roman Church in Italy as well as in Spain. At Naples the same principles which have put St. Mary in the place of Jesus are now placing St. Joseph i i the place of St. Mary"". What is Biel's Rationale of the system? '' You are afraid to approach the Father, frightened by only hearing of Him, but He gave you Jesus for a Mediator : what could not such a Son obtain from such a Father ? . . . This brother Mary gave you : but perhajjs even in Him you fear the Divine Majesty, because although He was made man, yet He remained God : you wish to have an Advocate even to Him. Betake yourself to Mary, for in Mary is pure humanity. The Son will hear the Mother, and the Father will hear the Son." Is not the Neapolitan peasant, justified in going a step farther, and betaking himself to St. Joseph, because the wife will hear the husband, or to St. Anna, because the daughter will hear the Mother } And is not the whole system alien fi-om that deep trustful spirit of filial love, whereby the humble Christian looks up with his heartfelt "Abba Father," to his dear Lord and Father, to Whom he is brought nigh by the precious blood of Jesus ? " For there is one God, and "WTien mute before the Judge I stand, My holy shield be Mai'y's haud ! Thou Mai-y, art luy hope and life. The starhght of this earthly stiife." Again, " Mary, let Thy Son no more His liugeiing Spouses * thus expect, God's childi'en to their God restore. And to the Spirit his Elect." ^ Mr. Faber is not left behind by the Itahan development here either. Addressing St. Joseph, he says, " Wilt thou Forgive a poor exile for choosing thee now ? There is no Saint in Heaven I worship like thee, Sweet Spouse of our Lady ! deign to love me !" • i. e. Tlie souls in Purgatory. THE ASSUMPTION. THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION. 43 one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all'." IV. Do you believe, as you believe a fact of history, that St. Mary was taken up bodily into Heaven ? Yet the Feast of the Assumption is one of the Festivals which is kept throughout Italy with the greatest splendom*. Do you believe in the Immaculate Conception of St. Mary"", although the dogma runs the risk of denying the Universality of Original Sin, and of marring the true doctrine of the Incar- nation, and although the testimony of the Church negative and jjositive is against it' ? But you must believe both of these, if you submit to the re-bajjtism of Rome. i 1 Tim. ii. 5, 6. ^ With a slight alteration of the two subjects, ' The Saints,' and, ' The Church of all lauds,' I should agree ^vith the following hues of Mr. Faber : "And the Saints new inventions of homage have found, New titles of honour, new honom's for thee, New love for thy shining, sweet Star of the Sea ! And now from the Chm-ch of all lands thy dear name Comes borne on the breath of one mighty acclaim ; Men call on thek Father that He should decree A new gem to thy shining, sweet Star* of the Sea !" Mr. Faber here acknowledges, that the honours and offices attributed to St. Mary are new inventions, (let us weigh both the words well,) aud are bestowed upon her by the Pope. For the dispute between the Franciscans and Dominicans on the subject of the Immacidate Conception, see Council of Trent, Sess. 4. For the progress of the opinion in Spain, see Doblado's Letters, Note A. 1 St. Aug. de Pecc. Mentis, ii. 24. "Quod (de B. V.) assumpsit id profecto aut suscipiendum mundavit, aut suscipiendo muuda^'dt." On which Arch- deacon Wilberfoi-ce remarks : ' If the Blessed Virgin had not been an inheritor of our common natm-e, she would have been less suitable for that service which it was her privilege to discharge.' Might he not have said even ' unsuitable,' nay, ' incapable ?' Doctrine of the Incarnation, p. 78. Even so late a ^viiter as S. Bernard, speaks most strongly against this ' new invention;' and we must recollect how much more valuable a late writer's testimony against a doctrine is, than his testimony for it. Testimony in favour of such and such a doctrine only bears witness to the fact, that at a certain date it was taught, and it may have corruptly crept into prevalence perhaps a centuiy previously. Testimony against a doctrine shews, that even 44 IMAGE-WORSHIP. V. Do you think it right to worship Images ? But this is a point of the Roman Faith. They are not merely used as memorials of the object of worship, for these are the exact words in which the controversialist Bellarmine lays down the dogma : " The Images of Christ and the Saints are to be venerated, not only by accident and improperly, but properly and by themselves : so that they themselves are fluJl the end of the veneration, as they are considered in them- selves, and not only as representatives"." The terms used by the Council of Trent are not so monstrous, but these are the expressions of Naclantus, Bishop of Clugium, who was one of the leading Prelates in its deliberations. " Wherefore not only must it be confessed that the faithful in the Church do adore before the Images, (as some perhaps for caution's sake express themselves,) but also they do worship the Image without any manner of scruple which you may suggest : nay, moreover, they venerate the Image with that worship with which they venerate its origi- nal : so that if the original has to be worshipped with latreia or douleia or hyperdouleia, the Image is to be adored wnth the self-same species of worship"." So that, according to the teaching of some of the Roman Doctors, the Images of Christ are to receive the worship of latreia for and in themselves, the Images of the Blessed Virgin the worship of hyper- at that date it had never heen heard of in the Chiu'ch except to be reprobated. Thus the over-reverence of the Greek Church paid to the Blessed Virgin proves nothing about the antiquity and truth of the doctrine. But the utter ignorance in the Eastern Communion of the Suin'emacy of the See of Kome is an insurmountable demonstration against the claim. ■" Bell, de Im. SS. lib. ii. c. xxi. Imagines per se et proprie colendas. Yet Bellarmine is more moderate than Aquinas, Sum. Theol. Pars 3. Qu. 25. Art. 3, 4. Cassander maintains the contrai-y view. Consult. 21. De cultu Imag. " We are not unskilled," says Bp. Taylor, "in the devices of the Komau wi-iters, and with how much artifice they would excuse this whole matter and palhate the crime imputed to them, and elude the Scriptures, but we know also that the arts of sophistry are not the ways of Salvation. Diss. p. i. c. i. §. 8. n J. Nacl. Clug. Exp. Ep. Rom. cited in Horn. iii. Against Peril of Idolatry. IMAGE- WORSHIP, 45 douleia, the Images of the Saints the worship of douleia. Thus it is expressly stated, that latreia to an Image is justifiable. Now Image is merely the English translation of Idolon, so that latreia to an Idolon is acknowledged to be right. Then how can we escape the conclusion, that Idolatry", which is a mere combination of the two words, is justifiable ? Can a thing be right when spoken of under two words, and wrong when spoken of under one? Either give up the thing, or defend the word. And how can you reconcile either thing or word with the second Command- mentP; with St. John's touching exhortation, "Little children, keep yourselves from Idols i;" with the universal practice of the Primitive Church, down to the seventh century''? Nor would much be gained should it be urged, as it might be, that the words of the Tridentine Council do not bind those who receive its decrees to actual latreia of the Image, but of the Image's Prototype. Is it possible to conceive that a Socrates or a Cicero really worshipped " Tliere are two senses in which the word Idolatry is used : 1. worshipping that which has no real existence; 2. paying adoration to the outward repre- sentations of real objects of worship. In the first sense no Christians are guilty of it : in the second is it possible to deny it ? At the same time it must be observed, that it is not their use but their adoration which is idolatrous. P In foreign Catechisms, and in those churches abroad where the Command- ments are exposed to view, the second Commandment is often wholly left out. This is a very different thing from the practice of joining the first and second Commandments together. 1 This woi'd would equally correctly be translated ' Images.' It is noticeable, that this is the last warning in the beloved Disciple's Catholic Epistle. 1 John V. 21. ■■ The well-known story of Epiphanius, whose date is about A.D. 370, is illustrative of the strong feeling of the Church at the end of the fourth century on this point. Going into a church in Palestine, "I found there a veil hanging at the door of the chiu-ch dyed and painted, and having the Image as it were of Christ, or some Saint. When therefore I saw this, that contrary to the Scriptm-es the image of a man was suspended in the Chm-ch of Christ, I cut it down, and gave counsel to the keepers of the place that they should use it for the burial of some poor man." The date of the Second Council of Nice is A.D. 787. 40 HALF-COMMUNION. pieces of wood and stone as pieces of wood and stone ? Did tlie Jews worship the golden calf as a golden calf? No; the first adored the Supreme Being or the Hero in this his representation, and the latter we are expressly told considered the Feast of the Golden Calf to be the Feast of the Lord Jehovah'. And vet this was Idolatry. How does even the educated Romanist differ from them, when he puts forth the plea that he is worshipping the Saint in the Image and God in the Saint' } YI. Do you dare to give up the privilege that has been yours since your Confirmation, of receiving that Cup which St. Paul declares to be " the Communion of the Blood of Christ" ?" Listen to the self-condemning words of the Council of Constance, by which in the year 1415 this * pro- fane novelty' was authorized. It " decrees, declares, and determines", that although Christ instituted this venerable Sacrament . . . and administered it to His disciples under both kinds of bread and wine . . . and in like manner that although in the Primitive Church the Sacrament was received of the faithful underboth kinds, yet. ..we command," (where was Vincentius' Rule here ?) " under pain of excommunication, that no Priest communicate the people under both kinds." AMiy did Christ institute the Cup } Why did He distribute it ? Why did He say, Drink ye all of this ? WTiy is the condition of ' drinking His blood,' added to that of ' eating His flesh,' in order that He may dwell in « Exodus xxxii. 5. * St. Clement of Alexaudiia, iii the sixth book of his Stromateis, wi-ites : " Moses had expressly enacted, that no statue or image must he made, that we might not give ourselves to the objects of sense, hut pass on to objects to he contemplated by the mind : for the familiarity of the sight always at hand lessens the majesty of God, and makes it cheap, and to worship the Intellectual Essence through matter is to dishouom- it thi-ough sense." " Non ego ilium lapidem colo," pleads the heathen disputer, in S. Aug. Ps. xc^i. " sed semo ei quem non ^ideo." " 1 Cor. X. 10. " Labb. Cone. Tom. xii. p. 1 00. Vide etiam Cone. Trident. Sessio 21. in Hai-d. Act. Cone. torn. x. p. 1 19. HALF-COMMUNION. TRANSUBSTANTIATION. 47 US and we in Himv ? Is it not to be most gravely ques- tioned, whether the blessed Sacrament can be received in its integrity under one kind ? WHiat was the practice of the Apostles ? What says Pope Gelasius, who lived in the year 490 ? " We find that certain persons, when they have received their portion of the Sacred Body, abstain from the Cup of the Holy Blood. Let these men beyond doubt, (since I know not by what superstition they can be hin- dered,) either receive the Sacrament entire, or abstain from it altogether, because thei'e cannot be a division of one and the same mystery without great sacrilege." Pope Julius, as late as the year 920, is not less explicit. "We have heard that certain persons, filled with a schismatical ambition against the divine decrees and the Apostolical institutions, have offered the Eucharist to the people dipped in the wine by way of full communion : but that this is contrary to the Ajjostolical doctrine, and to the custom of the Church, it is not difficult to prove, from the very fountain of truth from which the mysteries of the Sacraments have themselves come; for the setting forth of the bread and wine separately is recorded, and therefore every such error ought immediately to cease." VII. The difference between the Roman Transubstantia- tion and the Catholic doctrine of the Real Presence, is a most mysterious metaphysical question, to be handled with all reverence of thought, but yet it must be fairly met. Do you then mean by the former, that the external sign is so changed into the thing signified, as to lose the propriety of its own nature .'' In that case, where are the two parts of the Sacrament, and what becomes of the argument of the Fathers for the two natures of Christ from the twofold nature of the Holy Elements } Do you choose the dogma of the Council of Trent, or that of the Anglican and of the Primitive Church embodied in the following extract from Pope Gela- sius^ "Doubtless, the Sacrament of the Body and Blood y John vi. 5G. ' Gel. de duab. Nat. Tbeod. Dial. 2. St. Chrys, Ep. ad Ctes. Vide Peai'son on the Creed, note p. Art. III. vol. ii. p. 201. ed. Burton. 48 INLULGENCES. which we receive is a Very Divine Thing, whereby we are made partakers of the Divine Nature, and yet it doth not cease to be bread and wine by substance and nature ?" VIII. In Home as well as in Spain on almost every church there is inscribed above the door, " Indulgentia, Plenaria, Quotidiana," &c. On the Cross in the centre of the Colosseum is written, " By kissing the holy Cross, two hundred days' Indulgence is acquired*." Two hun- dred and fifty-two years, i. e. as much as would be gained by two hundred and fifty-two years of rigorous Penance, is granted for ascending the Scala Santa on the knees. Seven years and seven quarantines (i. e. seven years and seven forty days) are given for attending a Procession of the Host with a taper, five years and five quarantines without a taper, three years and three quarantines for attending it by deputy. In the church of Sta. Maria della Pace, as well as numberless others, a board announces, that every mass there celebrated delivers a soul from Purgatory''. What is the meaning of these and a hundred other such announcements ? Do you believe that the satisfactions of the saints in the way of good works are more than are needed for themselves ? Do you believe that this overplus of good works, added to those merits of Christ which were more than sufficient to redeem mankind, is entrusted to the Church as a sort of fund% which the Pope may dispense * "Baciando la santa eroce si acqnistano dncenti giomi d' indulgenza." There is a passage through tlie Colosseum, and those who viish. to pass from the part of Eome near S. John Lateran to the other parts of the city naturally pass through it. It may be imagined, that so easy a method of maldng up for two hundred days Penance is not lost. *> " Ogui messa celehrata in quest' altare libera un' anima dal piu-gatorio." The question natiu-ally aiises, ' Why then are tlie relations of tlie depai-ted so cruel as to allow any to remain there ?' It is to be supposed, that none can be allowed to stay in this state of torture, except such as have no friends on eaith to pay for a mass. Vide supra p. 29. c If this fund is formed only of the merits of the Saints, it may be exhausted; if of the inexhaustible merits of Christ, why are those of the Saints added ? INVOCATION. SAINT-WORSHIP. 49 according to his pleasure, nay if he will for money % for the benefit of those who have not made sufficient satisfaction for the temporal jjunishment of sin, whether in this world or in Purgatory I Will you believe all this with Rome, or will you believe with the Catholic Church that doctrine of which the other is the corruption, that the Church has the power to remit the fulfilment of ecclesiastical censures imposed by the Church? IX. Do you realize to yourself all that is implied in the Invocation of Saints, and the distinction between it and the doctrine of the Intercession of Saints? Do you soberly believe that they have the Godlike attributes of Ubiquity and Omniscience ? Yet this is necessarily implied in their Invocation. Do you believe that they are already advanced to the full bliss of heaven, though the early ChurcH prayed not to but /or them, on the grounds that they, with all the accepted, were retained in Paradise until the time when the elect should be accomplished? Do you in the bottom of your heart believe that such prayers as the following, offered to St. Peter on the anniversary of St. Peter's Chair, are not derogatory to the glory of God, "O Peter, Blessed Shepherd, of thy mercy receive our prayers, and loose by thy word the chain of our sins^?" Is such a pi'ayer in accordance with « Tetzel's profanity would be reprobated by all true Christians of liis own Commnnion. But is it any thing else than a justifiable development in a coarse mind, of the principle involved in ' The Tax Book of the Apostolic Chancery,' and the Indulgence of Alex. VI. A.D. 1500 ? The form of Abso- lution used by Tetzel, which was sold for money, contained the following words : " I restore you to that innocence and purity which you possessed at Baptism ; so that when you die, the gates of pimishment shall be shut, and the gates of the Paradise of delight shall be opened ; and if you shall not die at present, this grace shall remain in full force when you ai'e at the point of death." Was the indignation that burnt within Luther's soul so groundless? d In Cathedra S. Petri in Brev. Rom. this is offered publicly by authority. In Italy, such prayers for private use are common in church after church. They are written on a boai-d fastened by a small chain to a kneeling-bench before the Image or Altar of the Sahit. They are in the vernacular, and conse- quently tlie real prayers of the people, while the supplications in the Breviary E 60 CANON OF SCRIPTURE. DEAD LANGUAGE. Rev. xix. 10. "And I fell at his feet to worship him, and he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellow servant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus. Worship God r X. The Council of Trent has altered the Canon of Holy Scripture. It has added to the Inspired Word of God the whole of the Books of the Apocrypha, with the exception of the two Books of Esdras and the Prayer of Manasses. Are you prepared to " receive and venerate them with the same affection and reve- rence" as the Canonical Scriptures, although, to put aside the internal evidence against them, they were ignored as inspired, while they were received with reve- rence, as with us, by the whole of the early Church ? The list given by Melito% Bishop of Sardis, A.D. 177, is exactly the same as our own, as well as that of a string of authorities, including the Council of Laodicaea in the year 367, and Gregory the Great in the year 590; nor indeed was any other accepted by any part of the Church till the year 1546. Dare you do so great dishonour to God's word ? XI. Do you think that the use of a dead langaiage for prayer*^, and the necessary imposition of celibacy^, (how- ever excellent the voluntary practice of it might be,) are in accordance with the letter or spirit of St. Paul's teaching in Holy Scriptm-e and primitive custom ? XII. Do you believe, that all the Apostles received their and Missal to God are ordinarily in the Latin. The following is hung up not far from the chm-ch of St. Antony : " Antonio il Santo, passeggiero adora Che fui di miracoli fecondo Pero con viva fide a lui affida Che perir non puo mai che in lui confida." ' Apud Euseb. Hist. Eccl. iv. 26. f 1 Cor. xiv. Origen contra Celsum, lib. \iii. Fom-th Lateran Council, Canon 6. This Council was as late as A.D. 1215. 8 ] Tim. iii. 2, 12. Council of Nice. Council of Gangra. PAPAL SUPREMACY. 51 Episcopal ordination, mission, and jurisdiction by imposition of hands from St. Peter''? Is it conceivable that such an hypo- thesis and the Acts of the holy Apostles can be both true } Wliy does St. Paul expressly call himself "an Ajoostle not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father," and proclaim himself " in nothing behind the very chiefest Apostles," so much so that " he withstood Peter to the face '," when it happened that the latter " was to be blamed." Can such a theory be made to agree with the account given us by St. Luke of the Council of Jerusalem '' ? Is it not an historical fact, that the Roman is not " the mother and mistress of all Churches," as much as that Julius Cassar preceded Constantino ? Can you persuade yourself that the Pope is " Bishop of Bishops, who rules over the whole Church of God, and every part thereof, with supreme sway; second only to God in spiritual jurisdiction, repre- senting Him on earth, His Vicar, sitting on His visible tribunal, and dispensing His supreme awards'?" Is *• This notable ' privilege of Blessed Peter,' is proved by Bellarmine, by two edifying arguments; ] . It is clear, he says, that our Lord ordained either none or all, or some, or one. The first alternative may be passed over; the second is disproved by the case of S. Paul; the thii'd, by the equality of the Apostles, except Peter, among themselves ; therefore it remains that he ordained St. Peter alone. 2. Except on this hypothesis it could not be true that Eome was the mother of all Churches. " Alioqui enim cum omnes Apo- stoli plmimos Episcopos in variis locis constitueriut, si Apostoli ipsi non smit facti Episcopi a Petro certe maxima pars Episcoporum non deducit originem a Petro." True, but would it not be simpler to form a destructive syllogism instead of a constructive ? Bellarm. de Rom. Pont. lib. i. c. 23. i Gal. i. 1. 2 Cor. xii. 11. Gal. ii. 11. ^ In this Council St. James, as Bishop of Jerusalem, presided over his brethren. (S. Chrys. Hom. 33 on Acts.) At the First GEcmnenical Council, subsequently to this Apostolic SjTiod, the Bishop of Cordova presided ; at the Second, the Patriai'chs of Constantinople and Antioch ; at the Thu-d, the Patriarch of Alexandria. Thus it so happened, that each one of the five Patriai-chates held this post of honom-, before it was occupied by the Legates of the Eoman See. • Tablet, Mai-ch 15, 1851. '< The Pontiff is the Doctor and Pastor of the whole Church; therefore the whole Church is bound to hear and follow him; 52 PAPAL SUPREMACY. there a shadow of such a theory to be found in the annals of the first centuries of the Church? The Fourth Oecumenical Council, held at Chalcedon in the year 451, has given the reason of the modified precedency which was held by the Patriarchs of Rome. " For the Fathers with reason gave precedency to the throne of old Rome," (not because it was the See of S. Peter, nor that such was the constitution of the Church, but) " because it was the Imperial City, and the 150 Bishops beloved of God," (who formed the Second Ecumenical Council,) " moved by the same consideration, awarded equal precedency to the most holy Throne of new Rome ; justly judging, that a city which is honoured with the Government and Senate, should enjoy equal rank with the ancient Queen Rome, and like her be mag- nified in ecclesiastical matters, having the second place after her." The Second and Fourth Qi^cumenical Councils therefore directly, and all the other early Councils, and all the facts of history" hy implication, deny the autho- rity of the Patriarchate of Rome, to be in any other sense superior to that of the other four Patriarchates of Constan- therefore if he eiTs, the whole Church will eiT." Bellarm. de Eoni. Pout. lib. iv. c. 3. " The Supreme Pontiff is set over the whole Christian world, and possesses in its completeness and plenitude that power which Christ left on earth for the good of the Church." Id.c.24. " The Infallibility of the Pope, and the consequent duty of implicit and universal submission to his authority, are necessary conclusions from his supremacy." Dublin Eeview, 1844. The whole Ultramontane theory is demolished by Bossuet, Def. lib. viii. c. 11, 12. " It is contrary to the whole spirit of antiquity, and is nullified by every act of the ancient Church," said Mr. Allies in 1848. o» " It is certain that St. Polycarp, Bishop of Smyrna, knew nothing of such a Supremacy in Pope Anicetus ; that Polycrates, Bishop of Ephesus, and the Synod of Asiatic Bishops, and St. Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons, and the Council assembled in that city, knew nothing of any such Supremacy in Pope Victor ; that St. Cj^prian, Bishop of Carthage, and the African Bishops, knew nothing of it in Pope Stephanus ; that St. Augustine and the Bishops of Africa knew nothing of it in Popes Zosimus and Boniface ; and that the Bishops of Eome themselves were ignorant of it for six himdred yeai-s." Wordsworth's Theoph. Angl. Partll.p. 246. ST. GREGORY ON THE SUPREMACY. 53 tinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem, than that in which the Bishopric of London takes precedency of the other sees in England. EJave you duly weighed the words of St. Gregory the Great, Bp. of Rome A.D. 591, or have you unfairly put them aside from your notice } " None of my pre- decessors have allowed the use of this so profane name ; for if one is called Universal Patriarch, the rest are robbed of the name of Patriarchs. But far be this, far be this from the mind of a Christian, to desire to grasp for one's self what would in the very smallest particle seem to diminish his brother's dignity. Therefore let your Holiness call no one ever Universal." " Who is this who, contrary to the statutes of the Gospels, contrary to the decrees of the Canons, pre- sumes to usurp to himself this name } Far be that name of blasphemy from the hearts of Christians, for by it the dignity of all Priests is taken away, whilst it is madly arrogated by one to himself." " I say unhesitatingly, that whoever calls himself, or in his haughtiness wishes himself to be called, Universal Priest, is the forerunner of Anti- christ, because in his pride he places himself before the rest"." These are strong words. They were written by the same holy Bishop of Rome at the end of the sixth century, to whom we owe the Mission of St. Augustine. These are twelve points, few among many, in which the Roman Communion has separated itself from the Catholic Faith, and contravened the teaching of Scripture and Primitive Antiquity. And we are not alone in our Protest against them. We are united with the 65,770,000 members of the Greek Communion as Catholics against uncatholic claims in many fundamental truths that we alike affirm. And our very differences strengthen the force of our unity where it does exist". It is only two years since a firm and dignified Protest has been put forth " S. Greg. Ep. V. and VII . <> Vide supra note, p. 43. 54 PROTEST OF THE ORIENTAL CHURCH. ENCYCLICAL LETTER. by the four Patriarchs of Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem, assembled with twenty-nine Bishops in Synod, against the encroachments of Rome p. This Protest was called for by an attempt on the part of the Roman Pontiff, to divide the Greek Dioceses into Latin Sees, similar to that which he has still more recently made on England. They do not shun to declare, that " the Church of Rome has cut herself off from the teaching of the Apostles, upon many Catholic and most essential articles of Christianity." Nay, they go so far as to affinn, that she is "the great Heresy of modern times," having ceased " to be jDiu-ely guided by the doctrine of the Fathers, and to walk by the never-to-be-forgotten rule of Scripture and holy Councils," and " claiming to herself the powers of a spiritual monarch and arbitress, powers which not even St. Peter possessed." Sect. III. We have now come to the third head : What is the most pressing danger to the Church of England ? We cannot conceal from ourselves, that there are many foes by whom our Holy and Beautiful House is beleaguered, and we only hesitate which amofig many to select as the most dangerous. One of the greatest perils to which we are exposed is the P It were most desii'able, that the " Encyclical Letter of the Eastern Chiorch," and the "Answer" by the Ex-Patriarch, Constantius the Wise, should be forthwith translated and published. See an able Ailicle on this subject, in a new and valuable publication, ' The Scottish Eccles. Journal, No. I.' A passage in it is well worth quoting': " Considering the position of the Greek and Roman branches of the Chm'ch, we are persuaded that any individual, who, upon liis own responsibUity, detennines to exchange at the worst one state of scliism which he has inherited for another which he makes his own by dehberate choice, becomes guilty of a com"se not only undutiful and sinful also on other accounts, but in the highest degree mischievous and injurious to the very cause which every Scottish or English Chiu-chman, who, either Romanises or Grecises, will probably flatter himself that he is endeavoming to promote ; we mean, the cause of Unity." PERILS OF THE CPIURCH OF ENGLAND. THE GREATEST. 55 spread of Latitudinarian and German views, whose tend- ency has as yet been unmasked in only a few instances, but which will inevitably lead many, minds on to an in- tellectual Scepticism. What we feel very keenly at this moment is the invasion of the rights and privileges and offices of the Church, by the tyrannical power of the State, and the reckless yet determinate resolution exhibited by men in power to ignore the difference between the things of God and the things of Caesar. Some dread lest we lose an Article of the Faith by reason of the Gorham Judgment. We cannot be safe, say some, till we have won back the right of having a voice in the appointment of our Bishops: till we meet freely to settle our own affairs in Convocation, say others. Public opinion has been expressed by the outcries of the Popular Meetings against us ; confess the despondent. Where are our natural Protectors the Bishops } ask the indignant. We shall be swamped by a hostile vote in Parliament, whisper the timid. The scheme is deeper laid; our education is being secularized, cry those who would be more long-sighted. The Papal Aggression is our danger, says another party. At least, there are perils enough to make us stand prepared, girded for the strife, with our armour burnished. But these are not the hardest things to withstand ; there is another danger and affliction which touches us closer. Such external adversaries as those above mentioned would have the effect of rousing us, but there is an internal evil which makes our knees feeble, and our hands to hang down. What could the world do to us, if we were faithful to ourselves } but these constant fallings away are as drops of our best heart's blood. This is the real danger of the Church of England. This is why ' we walk together and are sad.' This is at the bottom of many of those dangers enumerated above. Were it not for this, public opinion would not be irritated, and consequently the civil power would not dare to tyrannize. Were it not for this, Neologianism would never have taken such root as 56 ITS CAUSE AND ITS REMEDY. it has. Mr. Froiide of 1847, is the legitimate result of Mr. Newman of 1845<). The cause of this.cause of evils is not hard to discover. When a bow has been long bent in one way, on being let go, it cannot but fly too far in the opposite direction. " Is it not known to all, that every profound and powerful movement among men, however unequivocal its direction and purpose towards good, yet does by the necessity of our infiiTu judgment and wayward will generate at least partial excess'?" But it is now time that the pendulum should grow steady. The series of Tracts begun twelve years ago have proved to thinking Christians the necessity of Church- Membership for present grace and final salvation ; but there necessarily follows upon this a further question, "Wliat is this Church of which we must be members ? and it is on this — so to speak, minor premiss — that men are now splitting. The remedy is complex. With those things which will be really of most avail, such as the self-devotion of those who are loyal and sound-hea,rted, each in their own sphere, the present Tract does not deal. One element of cure will be to disabuse minds of a secret belief, illogically enough taken up on account of evils at home, with which we are familiar, that the system of the Catholic Church abroad must be more perfect : " a sort of Utopia," as Mr. Pugin says, " pleasant meadows, happy peasants, all holy monks, J>^ »:>> ^JO >">> »> ',"-J3D >y> ■»» »» *>^> zi» 'SX> >J»>^ • » JOP-^ >> :: r»"> » >^> >2»> >'»-5 ►■ >»••' i3> >5>~' . 1>>J ^>3 >n»i> >>■>■> >.~r>^> ^-- 3> 'S* » 32KJIS>