- PLEASE RETURN TO ALDERMAN LIBRARYRr ay St Pa eee pasa =: sees to p ee =: ee tf eee = taf . 3 —- J = cc Frd = ee a a ae — Ors et eee e F ; baa . ap o3D Fort Jefferson Loushatoho, A \ ~ River SS de Barancas Spanish 1794 My O Fort Assumption French 1739, - OO Old Rickasaw Towns e sy . * oe ft

Bae From tHE Harurest Time To THE PRESENT; TOGETHER WITH AN HistTorIoab AND A BrioGRAPHICAL SKETCH or HAMILTON County, BESIDES A VALUABLE Funp or Norss, ORIGINAL OBSERVATIONS, REMINISCENCES, Ero., Evc. STIS ale Ig Sala =A a | e@etete su *¢ ° oe , o a ~ . ? . ® © « os S» 2. ° e ) a: * a ? ee > ¥ oe ¥ . A] . 7 @ ¥ 2 . 7 ° t > . a) + » e * . e rs is x . ° ° » e > er @ > Ss F ’ e® #6 ® evs 9 * > 2 ee * - e® + »* @ se a ’ e @ » e e 2 . > @ . NASHVILLE: THE GOODSPEED PUBLISHING CO.., 1887.The State History, only, has been Entered according to Act of Congress in the year 1886, by THE GOODSPEED PUBLISHING COMPANY In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. ( . ‘ \egaleygl inthe weve ila HIS volume has been prepared in response to the prevailing and popular demand for the preservation of local history and biography. The method of preparation followed is the most successful and the most satisfactory yet de- vised—the most successful in the enormous number of volumes circulated, and the most satisfactory in the general preservation of personal biography and family record conjointly with local history. The number of volumes now being distributed appears fabulous. Within the last four years not less than 20,000 volumes of this class of works have been distributed in Kentucky, and the lemand is not half satisfied. Careful estimates place the number circulated in Ohio at 50,000; Pennsylvania, 60,000; New York, 75,000; Indiana, 35,- O00; Illinois, 40,000; Iowa, 85,000, and every other Northern State at the same proportionate rate. The Southern States, with the exception of Ken- tucky, Virginia and Georgia, owing mainly to the disorganization succeeding the civil war, yet retain, ready for the publisher, their stories of history and ‘biography. Within the next five years the vast and valuable fund of perishing event in all the Southern States will be rescued from decay, and be recorded and preserved—to be reviewed, studied and compared by future generations. The design of the present extensive historical and biographical research is more to gather and preserve in attractive form while fresh with the evidences of truth, the enormous fund of perishing occurrence, than to abstract from insufii- cient contemporaneous data remote, doubtful or incorrect conclusions. ‘The true perspective of the landscape of life can only be seen from the distance that lends enchantment to the view. It is asserted that no person is competent to write a philosophical history of his own time--that, owing to conflicting cir- cumstantial evidence that yet conceals the truth, he can not take that luminous, correct, comprehensive, logical and unprejudiced view of passing events that will enable him to draw accurate and enduring conclusions. The duty, then, of a historian of his own time is to collect, classify and preserve the materia] for the final historian of the future. The present historian deals in fact, the future historian, in conclusion; the work of the former is statistical, of the lat ter, philosophical. To him who has not attempted the collection of historical data, the obstacles to be surmounted are unknown. Doubtful traditions, conflicting state- ments, imperfect records, inaccurate private correspondence, the bias or un- truthfulness of informers, and the general obscurity which envelops all events combine to bewilder and mislead. On the contrary, the preparation of statis-3 n ™ - . ‘ OCTET Df judi a cg) feo ay Abt Pep ee, els we on iv PREFACE. tical history by experienced, unprejudiced and competent workers in special ties; the accomplishment by a union of labor of a vast result that would cost one person the best years of his life and transfer the collection otf perishing event beyond the hope of research; the judicious selection of important matter from the general rubbish; and the careful and intelligent revision 0} all final manuscript by an editor-in-chief, yield a degree of celerity, system, accuracy, comprehensiveness and value unattainable by any other method. The pub lishers of this volume, fully aware of their inability to furnish a perfect his tory, an accomplishment vouchsafed only to the dreamer or the theorist, make no pretension of having prepared a work devoid of blemish. They feel as sured that all thoughtful people, at present and in future, will recognize and appreciate the importance of their undertaking and the great public benefit that has been accomplished. In the preparation of this volume the publishers have met with nothing but courtesy and assistance. They acknowledge their indebtedness for valuable favors to the Governor, the State Librarian, the Secretary of the State Historical Society and to more than a hundred of other prominent citizens of Nashville, Memphis, Knoxville, Chattanooga, Jackson, Clarksville and the smaller cities of the State. It is the design of the publishers to compile and issue, in con nection with the State history, a brief yet comprehensive historical account of every county in the State, copies of which will be placed in the State Library In the prosecution of this work they hope to meet with the same cordial as sistance extended to them during the compilation of this volume. THE PUBLISHERS. NASHVILLE, July, 1887. 4 b TT wsCONTENTS. a FeO RY “Ol TEN N ESSEE. CHAPTER I. > “ca ‘ ) PAGE ee PAGE. | ‘Great Grent” and “Path Deed”’...-- a m0 GEOLOGY OF PENNESSEE.«-1-ccsncessranscereseren 13; | Holston Treacy The es Eee eas Q Area and Boundary of the Stabe:..--.--rcc 13 Incidents an® eRe a ea. ee ey on rm vA enh = } a aa soe Ser epaswunnaeness.e ss eee elccc. i4 Ages, rhe Geologie. po cucucnspsensres css ucnnt 15 Killing of the Cayetts, Rieu er ts aa Canadian Paid eres reererns cosets 17 Massacre of bot Toudon...:- 63. 86 Cons, Phe. caoee eat pte Se rrecuecsneeceete Ts ewe Li Massacres upon the Cumberland pees. ee Z 99 Cat yoniferous Age, rhe. pCO Secueweaetsceacsns 22, Nickajack Expe ition, Lhe.---sseresseeeeees Q7 Crab Orchard Section, The....--- AR EOSECELTLECOE ol Point Pleasant NOt cascneee 70 Cretaceous Period, rhe Deere pavncnenoascetsSencccn 24 ie Pocahontas 0] the West apie Lc ee nO Cross Mountain Section, MDVG...-a> consecvensessens™ 33 Rutherford’s Campzign : aparece) ane ah te es Champlain PaTiOd Der evmecnmecerer Ss So. do Shawanees, The PYls ce corcmnmanenenesemsncetces com ht } ‘os *Parce Sst Pp1e 2 Soe re ae LULU sree Ee eaiaee Cos se S26 UO Cine ce aieaee Te) : oal O1 Raccoon District... selene gee e en Sn nin ise = UU Shelby’s ‘ ampaign qgoainst the Lower Towns. VU Divisions, ‘1 he Bight Natural...c-cecereeeersee? ae LO Sevier’s Destru tive Cainpaigns = oF (x Region ies oe iL structLye Galnpalgys =-- Beta 2) : = | Lignitic Period, [ThG...-e-ee-us-ersveeeree™ igs ae 99, SETTLEMENT OF TENNESSEE. ---scrrsseneseerseer Bee LOS | Marble Beds, DNE.-.-v-r-ccsneses rere 07 A ee 39 Browns SIP ELO LON Users ccrneans ound napamna Heer 124 Metals, ‘The Principal...---ceeeersereepeer SEE 37 Chisea, rhe Indian Village. u-------seceerreresecesee” 110 Niagara EOd eal esccs-eenersvcessenesets orci 2 320 Charleville’s Trading CStatiOD «----nccsensenesnees tent 112 Primordial Periodlberc: cacccsress cn oe 16 Carter's \ alley, Settlement o! I eacawvacenentncan: 124 Recent Period, THE a.ccesee ee cccpenctenemmcecccs 23 Daniel Boone Be por OE recon at Subcarboniferous Po riOd LNG -crees-ce-nncrsneeersnts 21 Donelson SO NAlissenecensne connec mencccs ual 129 to 154 SUAVE MUNG VaCLOUS tose teres IT, 23 Expedition of De SObO se <-ccennns ss cccsneneac sina Gat 100 Temperature of the State, The.+.-.-----s-ssecerr"* 39 Brent hand English DOSI EDS: cscn esc cara canil 112 Trenton Period, The..--.: Nee AG ae ctavsents 12 ort Assumption... Pi Ie veswestesteeecon ay uaiaes 113 Thirteen Tennessee Periods, The le Ate 16 Findley § Excursion ye ee cas sapaicsninesne cose maaae 117 Western Iron Regiod Ye tee neta sees oan 35 French Lick, First Appearan’s Of... ereenseeneerre® 123 Fort Loudon, Construction of Se Le CHAPTER II. | Henderson's TIOAty---snceense0-2*" [HE MouUND-BUILDERS i | Hunting | arties, Sundry Pyecccehnass® ! y 4 r are ceric aeem ene conker eane nme ics mil - ke “ Long Hunters,” Dhosesac Age of the Mounds Ses BTEC COC CEIRCT FE RC CEERIISE IR ob La Salle and Marquebte..-sscss 07" Arguinents of Judge Tay WOOK..seencesreretrsneree 45 Results of the Treaty of 1763 Q Beet o} STR sreenen eae | rosesasers ov Regulators and the Scovilites, LDe.-+.-::-ss5: 122 er} Ne the SO DD Giesnecsnsrnnssn cect ain do Stations on the Cumberland, The..-------** Denne 127 arthage Cave, WiC. cnceecvecsescesns* Doo ecaeweuaesns 54 Snottswood’s a UTS os 9 mvidences of Prehistoric Ocoupalol |< Seana ns pet a gee 115 Fortification®, BiGrsccrccne Te eenees oI emns@Rowc Of DIScOvenc: sc ai: augmeline 111 Location ot the Barthworks Pc cessusecceces venens 49 Walker’s Expedition...... EO own sicher coe 415 Mounds ot Pennessee, TG sanrsnccaseeenototcctnes 51 to of Watauga Settlement, MTN oiicccronccsnsneaneseseesy tas 121 Natchez, The... seri Ee anaes conn spp tnear ces 48 Washington District, Watauga Settlement...-- 120 Op TE Serene ee i Lea re Washington County; eC ly perpcenre tesco vee 126 ‘Stone Fort,” The ON cveceacseessnmeset SPOIL 55 CHAPTER V.- Sun Worshipers, TNC. .oecerevensesee se” suageusureacasen 47 | gerrimMENT CONC LUDED ve+ree seer"? - aeanaecescnenstees ee AO Pribal Resemblances..-:-- Jeep deca kas nme Cang 40 Afiairs on the (aumberlande..-rvereserrersr 4 141 View of Hildreth...------- iyacenmeneeneete scnicttan lie! 44 Brown's Disastrous VOY ALC sevecnsnnnsensesene 144, 140 - sera Continental Land Warramts..--- ee earpcssecscsss” 139 CHAPTEXM Ill. Clinch-‘ umberland Road, TTC vecceeees cee sencrd 42, 143 {HE INDIAN TRIBES. ------""" adie a eae Ol Catalogue of Tard! Gramtsesccncnccocreernanua a 151 Avery Treaty, The..--... Pee ceeacaceneies pi fauaesuees 77 Chickasaw WS) RS ee rere ncrsetcnac ener tunel 152 Battle of Chickasaw Old. Field...--sesssssersserrert 69 Greene's RESeLVALLOM---ennsnsersresseern ay . 1389 Beloved Town, TO cies eee stent an 69 Land Companies, Mh Orc ccrscsocseseenessers 147 to 150 Battle of Long Island WL ALSievonccnrossoncccse=sensctar 73 Military Reservations, DVO. cccovscccnesancserenecetn =: 140 Battle of Boyd BeOS sce ccressstcnnenrec conan ne 80 NASH DOTOUS -ra-n--ssmasnnste iccensesccse 137 Boundary Established, A NeW eeccccccerscsncecseete” 82 Perils on the ¢ Maori eects )....cecrereccconessenccorensssessrssaceees 624 Lindsley (J. Berrien) Wee dapeoeeeedanar states sees Reeacecee 619 Legal Authors....... evasvednvevaeeces catevcasadancsee egcsesee 626 WUT EGC ooo nce ecco occ c eet eisecccenacacacnucncncdves ckenueess 626 Memphis Press, The.........+++++++- Saninsaceycsscereresa 337 MMI GA GOO Me cccccccocndccccnccucacsacecapruccerecesecesceovecsunse 629 MCAMALLY.....sssecssssessecescosnee cneessensssren essere . 621 IMG HOLT] Mises ecccctaccccuscccucncedcavcusstecseace a Keceiseeesee 62) MAVtiiiessc-cccsrscccoscones BREE ECECOLELIT EECCA 622 McTyeire .......000 MOTO EC Bee. Bee ceee aueeaketces ee G22, Medical Authors fo canbeseaes wecenee soba Shu cbevestedesceuns 622 MAULY cccrcscevsvveccseveensensscncccocncs RU csacuctacennecasnnats 623 IN @ISOMecscccreeccrccrectcracecsesccacscaccus Nashville Press, The... Pee AT iirc conc oc cv csusadsrncccccnscanssecccs G@BVSOM ser cstencceruccccccsvuccccsps mona sduuedan sonusaceuccaucs Ramsey...... soucenececasess RRCOTON Ge ecccccedcaccedrevenrsss RVAM) ccccenccoccvncncece wavecedsdceverecansnebae Bo aeaccencnaccs . 622 BRIVOYS cccaccceccctccecss Nee aaeteecvareceeen Bec ue eter ees 622 SUMIMETS,. cccccscsace Ss ene aa et pinesenacanscnnpenses 625 TANMNEHI]...ccccccecsecscevseescrncccc-os sesenesennssusceneces 620 CHAPTER XVIII. RELIGIOUS HISTORY .+.0--0---:resvecensececscceseeseeenne teense 638 Arminianism, The Creed Of........se++++++ Beeecases 648 Buildings Erected, The first...... ec gacuseucesrs deecce 646 Baptist Church, The........ssee.e--serereesssrenseenees ... 687 e hurch and State, Union Of............eeee-reereeeree 640 Camp-Meeting, The first.......cseessesssceereere teens’ 650 Creeds, Form: ation OTL cate an eae sneeses 658 Cumberland Presbyterian C hurch, The.......... 658 Christian Church, ‘l He.......---sescesseeeseseeserneesees 700 Garholie Church, The curate, Weceeedcustevsnanssebhess 704 Colored Churches, The....... Ne asia ee ceacgpat eieuas 708 i spise opal C hurch, TMH Oaviccescscecest concuceceusecstcne 694 Irreligion Punished ce gccusceneeenn Ue ease ov eveeks 641 Jerks, VG oo ceoc ccneccccces: concunwenacnpenees 651 to 650 Jerks, The Cause Of the,...:...cssece-ses cseeene 655 to 657 Jew ish Ghurch, TH6.....cccscecscceevcesss Soe cece. 400 Lutheran Church, The.....-..--:2cssseeereseessrereees . 20d Methodist Church, The. .....-..:---seeerenseereeereerees 662 Methodist Church South,.......-secsseersesserenseens’ 676 Methodist Statistics. .....-...c.-.ce-sseeerentaess 676 to 679 Methodist Book Concern, The......sesse-serresse-+0 679 Preaching in Tennessee, The fiNSUssiscsaesss 645 Presbyterian © burch, The.....-.20.cccceserneessecs eres 680 Revival, The Great.......sseeceseceseseeerseess: 649 to 654 Religious Intolerance...... eG Rage en /OO9 Separation of C hurch and St: ate. Uehaoeeeaeaee ens 644 Slavery Divides the ¢ HTT Che veccacceckensests 667 to 676 Univ rersity of the South, The.......-..---: 699 : CHAPTER XIX. BIOGRAPHICAL CHAPTER...«-..+++++++* ee Ae 708 Blount, Gov. William. .....-..--:sesessesessss seeseers 716 Bell, Hom. JOWM....0..ceeeecccesrrseeeeeneneteesseesss ie (LOO Brownlow, Gov. W Wb (sp oepacceccnosccoctooY ma) Carroll, Gov. WALLA... ..-ce sce ocsseverecscevevecececnes 719 ( ‘rockett, Clo]. Tavidh...ccsnccssccecenenssaccesescess : 728 Forrest, Gen. N. Bun cesccessererseonnernensssecsecsce ses 742. Grundy, Hon. WOlTXeccvccccscceccncercnscecsccnerreccorese 729 Hay wood, dudee TON Teciecececcvcceecceccccssorensasnes . 714 FLouSton, GOV. SAM...c.ceseeecensevesensnerresestrses sree es 724 Jackson, President ATA TOW .veeee ccececeencsnreess’: ~ 720 Johnson, Eresioent Andrew.. 749 Johnson, Hon. Cave...-.+++++++ ee Coast ce cecaweneerss 735 Polk, P De aaHe: TAMES Korerercececcccccerscscnnececnse= 738 R obertson, Geen. JAMIES...--cecsccseecscecesecsrscnccnnens 712 Sevier, Gov. J ST eee tincoerecnasesaneeratausteccneses 708 White, Hon. Hu; Or} Disseccveceraccenventern svertunnnene® : 732 Zollicoffer, Gen. POLLX Kuseceseecsccenseccnnneceencneer® 747ee as ee i ret feel r . - ™ ee CHAPTER XX. POLITICAL HISTORY. +-seecereeceeeees seeneeees Ee odeeieccetcns 749 Administrations Of GOV. SOVICL....+-+++-+eesenres 751 A bolitionism, Growth Of. .....ccsseeee ser sre eres 708 Abolishment of Imprisonment tor Debt...... 764 “Arnell Bill,” The 780 Billo tl So licccceccscs cctcssscccrccccwonscesesscsecscevesrscs 706 “Brownlow’s Legislature”..cccsce seeeesresres sees 780 fampaigns of 18-44 ANG 1848.....00-ecerer ere ees 771 a2 Campaigns Of 1872 and 1876.....-..++ceeeneecees 189-791 Dresser’s Arrest and Punishment.......-... eee TOT BleCEIOIS..-.ccceccececc ces scscerneccenrvccecnnscneconese 165-767 Free N@gYOes....-s-+-ceeeeeeeeeeereeceeesetneeneree es seoee 190 Franchise Measures Wve recat ep eonwncdeceaeeceuse 782-786 Free Negro Bill of 1859-O0.....-.sss0.0+ s+ ereseenes Houston’s Governorship.......- meesesces cose *4 Ganeacniient of Senator B lount. (5. Industrial De pression and Revival..........-. 753 Important Political EVents...-....+ssrrs+sseee 769-77] “Tnstructing Resolutions? The.......00ee002-2- (00 Jackson’s Official Career...........+++-- hese goes .- 760 Wel ROT, KLAN S sc ccccctscncescccccsvcccssnsccsecrss x 789 Later Political Events. ........ccsecsereeseeserses 10 96 Nullification. soscciee 2 New Constitut ion, The Sobe Politics of the ‘'Fifties”’ sseeceverse LID Pro-Slavery Movements..... sraseecsrsoes (OL Public Polity, Questions of......... 759 Restoration of Tennessee. 781 Resumption of Federal Authority. sees 771 Resignation of Senators Foster and White.. 768 Spanish Controversy, THe........1+--s-seeeee 749-750 Slavery Question, The........... seeuhaeekavecennacee) (00d Slave Legislation, Early...... pucess On Deen Ce bestacetenecenecisbssuvassas 7 State Del » The Nop ee eoee coucc ner bncccpeeaucesssess 793 I T War of 181. HAMILTON COUNTY. TAMILTON COUNTY ..cosccccccseccocccccccessencccsccsessence 797 Altitudes eS eee Canta cee ano pu caweevescunssaneeoaass 799 ROATOLOL cL ANC eccccccovcacctccctcrecccveussscsctersveens 886 BOY COrcevcccesscecvece secneccccecntsnenssscseenscescrsssceses 90] Business, The P resent BEEN OEE EO DST COPPELL 88] Cave Spring Station............scssscseseeevecees ccenne 900 Cemetery, IN STIOD Blo eo cccctcccsccuctccrscvanccasstes S25 Chattanooga, Co nfeceEats S PVACUATC...cccere . 818 @MickAMAUGAy BALTIC Olecscacisicacccccccucuvesscesss 819 Chickamauga, Ske tah Obeseicccccccserccscucesurenes 902 Chureh History Seas cuncdseceucnss) execs ecee 848 Circuit Court ClOrKS=:.-c.pcccsecccstccesss foe vatenss raRo | Contest in Legislature See cai oedeevevecdseee OOO Goultervillemtrs ee cae See BOT County Court Clerks............ccccesess Sven access ODS COULUS Wavlyie.s.ccccasseccsucecocescouness csslsenc peenee (OLE GTUTCHROIG Wi ccc cescc ccccstsssesssseccesses 817 WS Visseccbevesttccsbctuccvesnssascccecnuccesteccncsncseccess 899 Dallas eeice sire oo osc nwce cox ccedenens Pes ecen cg oncec ss, QOL DAVIS") CLLSOMs ccecccceccrcce se hecccecccerscsss ete OOLO Death Rae screre ices coco ccseckococccsocedeseueess veccss 350 PLO VALIOUS servers oc cc ccc ccusoccucsoereess AC 800 OAM OUD Coe cosce coco sca os conds Sacccavonssussceeecesedess 902 BreCaMan's AIGiSOCIOUY co eccescsneccscsecscusecees . 847 HUNG SCHOO cr ccesees Reece eee coe 842 Geo logy BPC CP CEE EERE COEIOPE CEE EOC EEEES EEC SU) Graded Schools ices cvccsvcaceccecoccercvccs eecbenecedess 843 GipernaLlorial VOLE IN SG :cse0. secs escsccces seeess 830 ERAT IS OMe coos Saoirse cnc ua ce asencceceedteepccteecess . 901 FRR ON asc cacti cis eiscccccccssiccccecodeceues eveeh od asaceue: 900 Incident, An.......... nepecnreadaacevoneseeecces eecsisedees 81] Indians “Drow blesses eee eee oe eee 808 Judges, Circuit Court, The First.......2......0+ 834 King’s Point.. # sibcadsosaucvacadescaivierceser: 900 Lawyers Me mtioned.. FOOLER GUE EEELT EL CE CCI 839 L egislature EYCVIOUS'tO: WAN. cccsecesce tests (OLD FOCATIONVOL, COUDLYirrc.-c,-ccscceccceccraar senate shence 797 DOokout MOUnN TRING ee ee SE SArODO Lookout Water Company, The...........-ss0-+ 870 Machine Works............. Gee eee See S18 WMarbleand Stonescec ce S 876 Marshalsiccicc ce fei ee ee 859, 861 Ma&V ONS SiO Leo sie ear ee $59 MGlV UN Gite cccsve cs seesstsiecsoiteeecevecvsses e cresereactce Missionary Ridge, ING WSPADECYS is: pcre cvessccrccseveseccesecseecesccccesecies Organization of C ounty Diseadadenauneeracensec nists, 797 CONTENTS. PAGI Orphans’ FLOM. cc ccccccccccccesrcsscccsevccrsuccecsonse SYo Polities from 1832 to L860... coccccccsscccsersaccnne Slo Population.......ccsecceeeereerees veces 540 Postmasters at ChattamO0ga.....----seceseceererees S90 Presidential Vote Since 1565.. OvU Property, Sale of eeveenssccscccnseasenees ca Rallroad ....eccceee pe ae ci nsesecteeneesescsss 862 Recapitulation, AA.....--.-s:rsesssssse svssersereccerees ean Recorders......-+-+-- 2 REPLrese NtatiVe....-..csceerecsecee eeseseeeneceers OoU Rolling Mills.........seccseseeeesereserees 871 Sale Creek..... aos 5 © Saw MillSssccce.s-- S/o SCHOO] S. cccccccccccccccccccncvoccccccccesvsecce sensor cesssoess S41 Si rip, City.. eneseseccrncnypeoossennuaasessteneeceerelass2<: ee Secret SOCLECICS. ...ccccecconcvccccnanesecsesees SoZ Senators. Since the War. Ou Settlers, Ear Sarees Bee cw Secedee scons es 803 sherttis..... Scawestsseceds 331 Sketeh of C is ULTATIOOL A... ccccccsvcccesceuncesncsescenss 4 Small pox cconceatuepacaesee OOO SOG VWs icc ccousncecoccond ccccsveccutsasccpeceunsccecesusesess JO Steele Home 94 TIT MNOLO Wihicvccccccctccscccticcscountopeescses 905 STIT VE VOSS... ceccccccscccccovee | Tax Collectors::...-2-.0s a " \ tt i IM ee ||| Save sil Sp! = ii Mt | | f — eay A j r eo NM ee ee et tet,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. CWOaROULCIOD tte ccc ss ce ccc ae css ne $ en Shale, with clay at top....... oes ge : ee SRN yASHAlOW Ee a ee 99 Sandstone, harder ee a ee 78 Coal, with occasional shales a ee Sandstonewshard: locale ce ore. eh os ee he occ kee eee 8 Shalewincludingsay thinisandstone... 72-0... .00--5 6... : 20 Mountain) limestone with, anchimedes: 605. acess. cose cesses con. 0 Below the conglomerate, in the eastern and southeastern part of the Sewanee District, there are usually four seams of coal. In Franklin County and in the southern part of Grundy one seam disappears. In the northern part of Grundy and in Warren another seam is missing, and the thickness of the lower coal measure is reduced from 360 to fifty feet, ex- clusive of the conglomerate. The coal beds are very irregular in thick- ness, being often too thin to work profitably and in some places from three to nine feet thick. The aggregate amount of coal is very great and the quality good, and the extent coincides with the SowanconDice trict. ‘The conglomerate is the cover and protector of the lower coal measures, having saved them from denudation in past ages. The Tracy City coals belong to the upper coal measures ; those of Little Fiery Gizzard to the lower measures. On Crow, Battle and Little Sequatchie Creeks are important outcrops of the lower coals. On Cave Creek in Marion County, under the Cliff rock, a coal seam nine feet thick outcrops and near in the “pocket” is five feet thick. At the old Parmelee Bank it is from seven to nine feet thick. North of Tracy City only two coal seams of the lower measures are usually found; those near McMinnville are thin. In Bledsoe, Van Buren, Warren and Grundy they are thin with occasional thicker spots. ‘The conglomerate is mainly the surface rock from Tracy City to Alabama, and over this expanse only occasional knolls of the upper coal measures occur: one two miles west of Tracy City, an- other about half way between Tracy City and the Nashville & Chattanooga tunnel, and another just south of the lower mines. Southeast, east and northeast of Tracy City the ridges of the upper measures often appear. The main Sewanee coal in the vicinity of Tracy City is of good quality, semi-bituminous, and contains little pyrites. It is fragile and is usually a four or five foot bed, and is the most reliable one west of the Sequatchie Valley. Other seams of the upper measures are found in the Sewanee District, but are not so valuable. The Raccoon and Walden’s Ridge District embraces the portion of the table-land east of Sequatchie Valley and the Crab Orchard Mountains, and extends from Alabama to the Emery River in Morgan County, compris- ing parts of Marion, Sequatchie, Hamilton, Bledsoe, Rhea, Cumberland, 2eee PLCs « TST i 7 7 Ree citar a ae 4 eo 36 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. : eek i ae eee : Roane and Morgan. At the Etna Mines and vicinity the Cliff rock be comes a conglomerate, and the conglomerate (the cap of the lower meas- ures) wecomes a sandstone. The following is the section at Etna Mines : UPPER COAL MEASURES. Feet. Sandstone, cap rock at Htna.......-. esse er seers cess tense estes ip Shale ee iia ce cielo eee a) mialajie ie clei e eee) © a, pieer@ sje .¥.0 818 (01/0/00 0.0) 8,000 Perr : Coal, good block and uniform........... ee ieee cre aicVeys seni cronelnss 4 Shale with occasional thin coal ...... sees eee eee eee te eececeers 30. to 0 40 Coal with slate or shale..... .5 to 6 Shale. . Rees occe sre Coal, eood plocke a sad RoasinecesaeeolOw TCR AV ere eee eel ses clo eisele resin wiceio «> chee cise 0.51 1 to 2 Sandstone (Conglomerate of last table). .... 1... secre eet e eter teers cee 75 Goals. ac. SO ee i oo ucuels oh veers (few inches) SHalereenic cues csi Hoo: Ds sie oldie oiwicre SOU LO 40 Coal. . ee , (10 inches) Sandy ana, eee te ie oo Sac slaieeeie lew eal aes 100 to 180 Conglomerate (the cliff ea af ane fomner fable Ww NOR it is classed with the lower coal measureS).........eceeceeeceeses 70 to 100 LOWER COAL MEASURES. Feet. Shale . ao Re a ont foci g ease et 10 12 Coal (main Rina or Cl fie vein, most important bed in the Raccoon WlOuntadins)) AVeCTALCs cris sem ciemieae on erence comes one 6D MITGaClAVAWAUIN SUOQ MANIC. oc icriseemia cntlaw: weiter saree oe ee veclnaecn i LOLS Slialereee se cs cock wi sisuels 6s cb sme sbes woleie css nies 5 to 20 Coal, thin.. es SO eS a, TREE sir cis sik gVEN o ctes eaiee Se UOeL ee and ‘sandy. hale: Se tage aie (eyeing c eceeyaishcsaierdue a: ois\ of edauus eye OORLO LeU a PT I eR i ris orl le aie ee wre ololélulc Pe sleletin ccs 4 +E OO Rrerclaya eae D Rien Ges cece oe are Gilera Seah aw LO Sandy shale and sandst tone! abo cHeaieiss sicyel Suc s/t Mis wre. «ciel ele ceeie ak ore i 20 to 25 RSLS eres ea ss oye Se niCINe Sie viens sikcceave auls s Ceti Mee ees e ee 15 to 20 *Coal.. ME ees oon eco oe oe Gils boa dbs cousins i cc cele tOle Reco eee Re salen ic cn cola cote bicrenee Ra bee eeewis Gas cOtOS Shales and hale pandeiones Sie tieis eiele as a eivcisis cnierelsierereseste 5 ae. 40 tO LOO Mountain limestone........ .-.....-N0t ascertained The above section is a a typical oan ot the measures of the Raccoon Mountain District. The upper measures are rich in coal, and it will be observed by comparison that there is one more coal seam in the lower measures than on the west slope of Sequatchie Valley, and the volume is much greater. The lower measures are well exhibited where the Ten- nessee River cuts through the Walden Range and are similar to the Etna measures. The four coals below the ena rock outcrop on the slopes. Northward to the Emery River the sections above of the Sewanee and Raccoon Districts may be taken as types of both the upper and lower measures. The main Sewanee is the principal coal, and numerous out- crops of the upper and lower measures occur on the eastern slope of thetable-land. HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 31 The strata are often much disturbed, doubtless by volcanic forces. The following is the section where the Crossville & Kingston Road crosses Crab Orchard Range in Cumberland County: UPPER COAL MEASURES. Feet. Shyla, ORNGAAN 668 coon gcagb ooo 0 coon HOoHOOCaoOOdan OD OO OHOCOOOOOIY ePrnie, Gowlass WAIN Gol onagcod cou onoddpoan0 anoouoKogaGCNdc 25 to 50 ST STOTO Mw nis ish ae pn tin sc sletorete o'ciuc ouae Seas rs 100 to 150 Shale; probably with coal. os. ose wee wn eee nee eens = 1 00 SECS EO TC ae sos OE aio bis tne Sloe cuaisis ecco mabe see ence ages s achecciommeeic 60 WoalmrnainuSewANees cs hee ec ico te cee oe coleln eles tee eras) Shale ip clint wiaieialee se @) es 8-8 6.8.6 6 8 8\'@: 0.6.66, 6. ¥ 8, 8) 8) © 8.6 O88) 6.0 6.0) 8,8) 6.8)\6: 6.0188) 6 aie 8).0) © Conglomerate, caps the mountains.......................-+.-- 100 to 150 LOWER COAL MEASURES. Sialespossiblyswith) COalsni.ah cms. s cee n een icine cetesiace LO San StONe es oa ae we tones Sec seeeinee avenue 33 Shale with light coal seams...........25 ceeseeceer ence cscs ceeeresee 110 TIC SEONG i ce cred cee en ee | eee) OU S hralemcwa Ui Um Ure! COM een ctacr erate clei cicte = aileeeie oi seeantetele present pro- per cent of fixed carbon and 25.41 of volatile matter. The pre | duction of coke is very great. | . Tron Ore.—The deposits of iron ore are of the greatest value. e outcrops where such deposits occur appear in three belts which have been eastern iron region which extends named and described as follows: The through the State with and in front of the Unaka Range; the Dye- stone region, which skirts the eastern base of Cumberland Table-land or Walden’s Ridge from Virginia to Georgia, and extends laterally into the valley of East Tennessee from ten to twenty miles, and includes the Sequatchie and Elk Valleys; the western iron region, which oceupies a belt of high lands contiguous to the western valley and a part of the valley itself, and extends from Kentucky to Alabama. The eastern region includes the counties of Johnson, Carter, Sul- livan, Washington, Greene; Cocke, Sevier, Blount, Monroe, Polk and the entire eastern part of McMinn. In the valleys and coves of this vast region occur most of the iron ore deposits. The bottoms of the valleys are usually occupied by shales and slates and magnesian limestone of the Knox group, which have been so leached and weathered that ridges and knolls of clay, sand, chert and shaly debris or clay have been formed, and in these masses the iron ore has accumulated. Limonite. by far the most abundant ore of this region, contains, when pure, 59.92 per cent of metallic iron; 25.68 per cent of oxygen and 14.4 per cent of water. The source of limonite is the ferruginous chert of ee acoumouon bed. Practically the percentage of iron is less than 59,92 2 per cent owing to impurity. This ore occurs both as honey-comb and ae ore and some- times in ochreous and earthy combinations. It occurs in all sizes less than beds ten or fifteen feet in diameter. Generally the most important banks are on knolls, hills or ridges fifty to 200 feet | t high and often several miles long, and the deposits occur at intervals. The ores in Johnson, Carter and W ashington Counties contain lead and zinc, These ores, in- cluding the iron, originated doubtless from the decomposed limestones which contain these elements. The iron ore is of excellent quality and the beds are so numerous that it is estimated that there is sufficient ore to supply an average of three or four extensive works to each of the counties named for a long period of years. Hematite contains 70 per cent of iron and 30 per cent of oxygen. Impurities reduce the amount of iron. The hard, solid ore of this division occurs cay in a few places *Analysis by Prof. Pohle, of Naot Vou ork PGi ee > . —— — eeeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. and in a regular, solid bed. The ore in more or less magnetic and ex- cellent. The Dyestone ore is a stratified fossiliferous iron rock and is composed of flattened odlitic or rounded grains and frequently contains erinoidal buttons. Magnetite, when pure, contains 72.4 per cent of iron and and 27.6 of oxygen. It is a very rare ore, one bed being in Cocke and another in Carter County. Itis associated with Sahlite and decom- posing gneissoid rocks and occurs in irregular layers, patches and wedge- shaped masses in the metamorphic group. On the west side of the valley of Kast Tennessee is the Dyestone iron region, which includes a portion or all of the following counties: Han- cock, Claiborne, Grainger, Campbell, Anderson, Roane, Rhea, Meigs, Hamilton, Marion, Sequatchie and Bledsoe. The oreisa distinctly sath fied red iron stone, a variety of hematite, generally soils the fingers, but is sometimes quarried in blocks. It is highly fossiliferous and upon ex- posure becomes brownish red, though almost scarlet when first mined. This is the main ore of this region and its impurities are sandy and ar- gillaceous matters and carbonate of lime. Numerous banks have been Limonite to a limited extent is found in this region. ‘The aining the Dyestone ore is 150 miles long and its Upon the Cumberland Table-land This ore is an Impure carbonate of opened. mountain ridge cont average thickness is over 20 inches. occur a few beds of clay jronstones. iron and contains 41.25 percent of metallic iron, 11.78 of oxygen, Sow carbonic acid and 11.8 of water, ete. Practically 30 to 33 per cent of iron is obtained. It occurs in nodules and balls and is limited in quan- tity. Black band ironstone and limonite are also found seattered over the table-land. The western iron region includes part or all of the following coun- ties: Juawrence, Wayne, Hardin, Lewis, Perry, Decatur, Hickman, Humphreys, Benton, Dickson, Montgomery and Stewart. The belt is about fifty miles wide and over the entire extent more or less ore occurs. avy deposits of great value and extent are There appear centers where he dges of plateau found. These banks have a high position on the tops or e ridges, and owe their origin very probably to the remains of decomposed sandstones before the Central Basin or the valley of West Tennessee was © excavated. The banks are from a few feet to 100 feet. Limonite is al- most the only ore, though hematite occurs near Clifton, in Wayne County. ar lumps or hollow concretions called “pots” e debris of the strata of the siliceous of half decomposed and often This is the bed of t, honey-comb, pot Limonite occurs in irregul scattered through the matrix of th group, cousisting of angular fragments bleached chert and soft sandstones imbedded in clay. the ore. The varieties of this ore are called compaca 36 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. | and pipe ores and ocher, the first three being common. The pots vary in til size from an orange to two feet in diameter. Pipe ore is worked in Stew- ft ] art County. It is estimated that the best banks furnish one-fourth to Fil one-third of the mass removed in iron ore. Its occurrence in banks is | irregular—sometimes in pockets, beds, veins, strata, columns, or isolated masses often ten to twenty feet through. Some masses furnish scores of | tons of ore. The beds of Hickman are most extensive and valuable and | more than twenty banks have been opened. - Those of Dickson and Stew- | art are next valuable. On the eastern rim of the basin in the counties of White, Warren, Putnam and Overton, corresponding with the deposits of the western belt, limonite of good quality is found. The percentage of pure iron varies from 44 to about 60. Fossils.—The paleontological features are characteristic and import- | j t iil ant. Every formation considered in this chapter, except the Unaka, t | contains fossils, often large, finely preserved and beautiful. As every formation contains, in the main, its own fossils, they become an import- ant factor in identifying the strata. The most fruitful source of fossils in this State are the Trenton and Nashville groups. The following is a A it list of the genera: Buthotrephis, Stromatopora, Stenopora, Constellaria, i « Tetradium, Columnaria, Petraia, Cleiocrinus, Dendocrinus. Glyptocrinus, Palzocrinus, Petraster, Ptilodictia, Retepora, Graptolithus, Leptzna, Strophomena, Orthis, Skenidium, Rhynchonella, Triplesia, Avicula, Am- bonychia, Crytodonta, Ctenodonta, Modiololopsis, Holopea, Cyclonema, Subulites, Eunema, Helicotoma, Maclurea, Trochonema. Pleurotomaria. Murchisonia, Crytolites, Bellerophon, Carinaropsis, Clioderma, Conularia, Salterella, Orthoceras, Cyrtoceras, Lituites, Trocholites, Asaphus, Ole mene, Cheirurus, Encrinurus, Ilaenus, Lichas. Phacops, Dalmanites ana \ | Leperditia. Many of these are represented by a half dozen or more species. In the Niagara group occur the following genera: Astylo- spongia, Paleomanon, Artrospongia, Stenopora, Thecostegites, Tecan Heliolites, Plasmopora, Halysites, Favosites. Cyathophyllum, Reteaial vil Aulopora, Alveolites, Cladopora, Fenestella, Caryocrinus, Aplocystites, | Pentatrematites, Saccocrinus. Platycrinus, Lampterocrinus, Groce | ees eee eynbaiocr ane) Posteriocrinus, Gysto- ti ere I crinus, Valceola, Strophomena, Streptorhynchus, Orthis, | i Spirifer, Atrypa, Pentamerus. Athyris, Rhynchonella, Platyostoma. Platy- ceras, Cyclonema, Orthoceras, Ceraurus. Spheerexochus, Dalmania, Caly- | | | mene and Bumastus. In the Lower Helderberg formation the followine Un a oe Anisophyllum, Favyosites, Aplocystites, Leptena, Stropho- mena, Strophodonta, Orthis, Spirifer, Trematospira, Nucleospira, RI] H 3 ospira, Lept ia, Rhynchonell: sa . pira, Leptoccelia, Rhynchonella, Atrypa, Merista, Camarium. Eatonia 1ynch- A 3 ee = HUTT iin Nay mit] a nmin UA ac FT ELLE ERPO DE Pg offi esti a yeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 36 & Pentamerus, Platyostoma, Platyceras, Phacops, Dolmania and Dalmania. In the Lower Carboniferous formation are found the following genera: Spiriter, Orthis, Platyceras, Granatocrinus, Agaricocrinus, Actinocrinus, Cyathocrinus, Icthiocrinus, Lithostrotion, Zaphrentis, Pentremites, Tice chorinus, Melonites, Hemipronites, Retzia, Rhynchonella, Productus, Conularia, Astrea, Archimedes, Athyris, Terebratula, Aspidodus, Gilat dodus and a few others. The Green Sand of West Tennessee, fare beds of fossil shells, contains the following genera so far noticed and named: Platytrochus, Corbula, Crassatella, Astarte, Venilia, Car- dium, Trigonia, Area, Nucula, Cuculloea, Ctenoides, Pacten, Neithea, Ostrea, Oxogyra, Graphe, Anomia. Placunanomia, Scalaria, Naticat Volutilithes, Rapa, Auchura, Baculites, Enchodus, Sphyrena, Ischyrhiza, Teredo, Serpula, Rostellaria, Fusus, Turritella and Delphinula. Tin five Corbula, Venus, Crassatella, Cardita, for its Ripley group are the following: Leda. Modiola, Ostrea, Gryphea, Turritella, Natica, Fasciolaria, Nep- In the Bluff loam of West tunea. Callianassa, Lamna and erocodilus. Amnicola, Lymnea, Succinea. Tennessee are Helix, Planorbis, Cyclas, In the Knox group are Crepicephalus. Lonchocephalus, Agnostus, Ling- ula and Pleurotomaria. ; The fossil fauna of Tennessee are distinct In the main Sewanee and Jackson coal horizon Hymenophyllites, Alethopteris, Aster- llaria, Syrigodendron, Lepidoden- 1 Rhabdocarpus, and in the main and Lepidodendron, and at the id the fossil nut: and characteristic of the strata containing them. occur the following: Neuropteris, ophyllites, Calamities, Stigmaria, Sigil dron, Lepidostrobus, Trigonocarpum an Etna Sphenopteris, Hymenophyllites base of the coal measures on the Sewanee Railro: Trigonocarpon. West Tennessee. Quercus, Laurus, Prunus, laus, Fagus and Ceanothus. the extinct Mastodon, Megalonyx, Castor and Castoroides. Metals.—Copper ore is found at Ducktown. The surface of the coun- and is about 2,000 feet above the sea. Ocoee River crosses alcose, chlorite and mica slates, and dip at are great lenticular masses Wood and leaves are found in the Ripley group in In the Orange sand appear the following genera: Andromeda, Sapotacites, Eleagnus, Salix, Jug- On the west side have been found bones of try is rolling, this area. ‘The rocks are t high angles to the southeast. The ore deposits of metal and gangue material, occurring in lor These dip at high angles, and upon about ten feet are the black copper ig ranges or belts, which have been improperly termed veins. the surface is gossan, and below it her down are other zones cont since the discovery of copper in 1848, Copper pyrites, iron pyrites, ores, and furt aining more or less copper. Numerous mines have been opened The ores and minerals found are as follows:wie! = ee ee er ce aa — —— 38 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. magnetic pyrites, copper glauce, zinc blende, galena, orthoclase, as tremolite, actinolite, diallage, zoisite, calcite, quartz, rutile, wees O- phane, alisonite, bornite, red copper, malachite, azurite, copperas, : ue- stone, black oxide (very valuable), native copper, harrisite, rahtite, limo- nite (gossan). Millions of dollars worth of copper ore have been taken out and shipped away. : in Nearly every county in Hast Tennessee contains galenite in small quantities. In Claiborne and Union Counties 1t occurs particularly abundant. Inthe latter county, on Powell’s River, between Tazewell and Jacksborough, about sixteen miles from Tazewell, is one of the richest mines. The vein fills a nearly vertical fissure about twenty inches wide, in nearly horizontal rocks, and can be traced nearly a mile. ‘The galenite is associated with zine blende and pyrite, and occurs in sheets, two or more, having an aggregated thickness of five to ten inches. This mine is typical of the others. Near Charleston galenite was mined by the earlier races, probably Mound-Builders. Veins of galenite occur also in Middle Tennessee, but are of little importance. An important one occurs in Davidson County, near Haysborough, occurring in a gangue of barite. Galenite has also been found among the limestones of West Tennessee. Smithsonite and calamite, two zine ores, occur in deposits and irregular veins in the dolomites of the Knox group, the most important being in Union, Claiborne and Jefferson Counties. The Steiner locality in Union County is important. The ore outcrops in a belt fifty or sixty feet wide, and runs across a low ridge. Through this ore small veins of Smithsonite and calamite ramify. Gold occurs in East Tennessee in the sands and gravels of creeks which flow over the metamorphic slates of the Ocoee group, and could doubtless be found in the quartz veins of the same group. It has been found in Blount, Monroe and Polk Counties. The most has been found on Coca Creek and vicinity, in Polk County, in a tract eight or ten miles long by two or three wide. Gold was first discovered in 1831. Soon afterward the field was thoroughly explored, and up to 1853 $46,023 in gold of this locality was deposited-in the United States Mint. This gold is derived from the decomposed quartz veins, and has been washed into creek valleys: A quartz bearing gold has lately been found in Whip-poor-will Creek, the metal appearing in grains or scales in the quartz. Lignite is found in beds in the Mississippi bluffs, and is a mass of dark grayish, laminated, micaceous sand, with lignitic, woody fracments. sticks, leaves, etc. It is also found in Carter County and a few otl places. Orude petroleum and allied substances have been worked with profit in various places in Tennessee. Maury, Jackson, Overton. Dickson. Wilson, Montgomery, Hickman and other counties furnish it. 1erHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 39 The black shale is a great source of these oils, the richest producing from thirty to forty gallons of oil to the ton. The Spring Creek, Over- ton County, wells have yielded most. Thousands of barrels of erude petroleum have been pumped, salt mines have been worked on Calfkiller Creek, and in Anderson, Warren, Yan Buren, Overton, Jackson and else- where. Sulphur springs occur in some localities. Nitre is found in the numerous caves of the limestones of the table-land. Alum is obtained from the black shale. Epsom salts is found in the caves. Gypsum ap- pears in several caves. Barite is found. Copperas was formerly exten- sively made from the protoxide of iron (pyrites) thrown out at the Duck- worth copper mines, also sulphate of copper. Iron pyrites is often found. Black manganese is often found associated with limonite. Marble.—The marbles are very valuable, and are already a great source of wealth. They have been divided as follows: 1, reddish varie- gated fossiliferous marble; 2, whitish variegated fossiliferous marble; 3, dull, variegated magnesian marble; 4, black and dark-blue marbles; 5, breccia and conglomerate marbles. The first is the most important and occurs in East, Middle and West Tennessee. Beds have been opened in Henry County, also in Benton and Decatur. In Franklin County are ex- tensive beds. In White County a clouded white marble is obtained. In the valley of East Tennessee the reddish marble occurs in Hawkins, Han- cock, Grainger, Jefferson, Knox, Roane, Blount, Monroe, McMinn and Bradley, and to a more limited extent in Meigs, Anderson, Union and Campbell. It has been extensively quarried, and is a variegated crin- oidal and coralline limestone colored grayish-white or brownish-red and sometimes pinkish or greenish-red. The most common color is brownish- red more or less mottled with white or gray clouds or spots, due to corals, Large quantites are mined and shipped. It possesses great properties of weather durability and resistance to pressure. The whitish marble is a coralline, sparry gray-whitish rock, much of the white ground being mottled with pink or reddish spots. There is no superior building stone in the State than this variety. The other varieties are rarer, but all are good. From the gneiss and white quartz stones of the metamorphic group excellent mill-stones are obtained. ‘The chert of the Knox dolo- mite furnishes fine mill-stones. The Ocoee group produces the best roofing slates. Hydraulic limestone and fire-clay abound. Sulphur, chalybeate, Epsom and alum springs abound. Sulphur springs originate in the black shale. Temperature.—lt has been found, through many years) observation, that the mean annual temperature of the Valley of Hast Tennessee is about 57 degrees, of the Central Basin 58, and of West Tennessee 594 to 60 de-EHSL a ttre LEMONT EYEE] pm ie (atti | SS eff LLDMMPTEI TODO YT TRENT TAT 40) HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ; : m Se eee grees, through the central part of the State, east and west. The average annual minimum temperature of Middle Tennessee is 2 degrees, and the average maximum temperature about 94 degrees. The average length of the growing season, between the last killing frost of spring and the first of autumn, is about 194 days. In Hast Tennessee it is a few days less. Southerly winds are most prevalent, then northerly, and easterly and westerly about the same. The quantity of rain and melted snow varles annually from 43 to 55 inches. These estimates are the best that can be given from the limited observations made in the past. Elevations.—The principal elevations above the sea are as follows, in feet: Stone Mountain range—Cat Face Mountain, 4,913; State Gap, 3,400; Taylorsville, 2,395; State linein Watauga Valley, 2,131; Yellow and Roane range— Yellow Mountain, 5,158; Little Yellow, 5,196; Roane—Cold Spring, 6,132; Grassy Ridge Bald, 6,230; High Knob, 6,306; High Bluff, 6,296 ; Bald Mountain range—Bald Mountain, 5,550; Jonesborough, 1734; Big Butt range 1,581; Great Smoky range—Warm Springs, N. C., 1,335; piazza of hotel, Tennessee line on French Broad, 1,264; Indian Grove Gap, 4,288 ; Man Patch Gap, 4,392; Bear Wallow Mountain, 4,659: Luftee Knob. 6,238; Thermometer Knob, 6,157; Raven’s Knob, 6,230: Tricorner Knob. 6,188; Mount Guyot, 6,636; Mount Henry, 6,373; Mount Alexander, 6,447; South Peak, 6,299; highest peak of Three Brothers, 5,907: Thun- der Knob, 5,682; Laurel Peak, 5,922: Reinhardt Gap, 9,220; top of Richland Ridge, 5,492; Indian Gap, 09,3817; Peck’s Peak, 6,232: Mount ‘ ATU T NE ~ a : ge Ocona, 6,135; New Gap, 0,096; Mount Mingus, 5,694: Bullhead sroup < highest points over 5,000 feet; Greenville depot, —Mount Le Conte (central peak), 6,612; Mount Curtis (west peak), 6,568; Mount Safford, 6.535: Cross Knob, 5,931; Neighbor, 5.771: Master Knob, 6,013; Tomahawk Gap, 5,450; Alum @are £971; Rood Gap, 5,271; Mount Collins, 6.188: Collins’ Gap, 5,720; Mount. Love. 6,443; Clingman’s Dome, 6,660: Mount Buckley, 6,599; Chimzey Knob. 9,088; Big Stone Mountain. 9,614; Big @herry Gap, 1 838; Corner Knob, 5,246; Forney Ridge Peak, 5,087: Snaky Mountain, 5,195; Thun- derhead Mountain, 5,520: Eagletop, 5,433; Spence Cabin, 4,910: Turkey Knob, 4,740: Opossum Gap, 3,840; North Bald. 711: Geta aie x Nes 16 a7 eye ; a ee ere South re 4,708; Tennessee River at ) og © -e€ Mountain, 2,452; Montvale Springs, 1,293: peuween Little Tennessee and Hiwassee—Hangover Knob, over 5,300: Haw Knob, over 0,300; Beaver Dam or Tellico Bald, 4,266: south of the Hiwassee the elevation of the chain is reduced to 3,000 to 3,400 feet; Frog Mountain is about 4,226 feet; the Ducktown cop about 2,000 feet high. per region isHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Al Along the East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia Railway the eleva- tions are as follows: Bristol, 1,678; Union, 1,457; Carter, 1,474; John- son’s, 1,643; summit between Chucky and Watauga, 1,841; Jones- borough, 1,736; Limestone, 1,419; Fullens, 1,489; Greeneville, 1,581; Bulls Gap, 1,214; Russellville, 1,260; Morristown, 1,283; Strawberry Plains, 906; Knoxville, 898; Loudon, 819; Athens, 993; Hiwassee River at low water, 684; Cleveland, 878; State line between Tennessee and Georgia, 837; also Clinton, 847; Chattanooga, railroad grade, 679; Tennessee River at Chattanooga, 642; Cumberland Gap, 1,636; Pinna- cle (near gap), 2.680; Elk Gap (surface), 1,702; Cross Mountain Point, 3.370; Gap, 2.875; Cove Creek, 1,041; average bottom of Elk Fork Valley, 1,200; Pine Mountain, 2,200 to 9.400; Tellico Mountain, 2,000 to 2.700; Crab Orchard Mountain, about 3.000; flat summit of Lookout Mountain, 2,154; Raccoon Mountain, back of Whiteside depot, 1,900; Tracy City, 1,847; highest ridges near Tracy City, 2.161; summit of Ben Lomond, 1,919; Tullahoma (grade), 1,070; creek at Manchester, 996; McMinville (depot), 912; Sparta, station, 945; Livingston, station, 966; Hickory Nut Mountain, about 1,400; Murfreesboro depot, 583; Nashville depot grade, 435. Nashville, low water in Cumberland, 365; Springfield grade, 659; Gallatin surface, 525; Franklin depot, 642; Columbia depot, 657; Mount Pleasant (creek), 625; Palo Alto, 1,025; Pulaski, 648; Kingston Station, 506; highest point on the railroad west from Nashville to the Tennessee River, 915; lowest point on the grade at the Tennessee River, 368; Grand Junction on the west side, 575; Middle- ton, 407; Moscow, 8351; Germantown, 378, Memphis, 945; low water of the Mississippi at Memphis, 170; Obion River on the Ohio & Mississippl Railroad (grade), 287; Bolivar, 430; Medon, 420; Jackson, 459.a iia i ne >. = ‘ aera Meche TTD Tw rrerttfy fie LTTE NRL FT aA TT - ee SR Se . HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. CHAPTER II. THE MOUND-BUILDERS—EVIDENCES OF PRE-HISTORIC CLOUP ATION Ea UMENS OF BANCROFT AND HILDRETH—DEDUCTIONS OF JUDGE pe OOD PARISON OF ANCIENT RACES AND CUSTOMS—THE SUN WORSHIPERS—THE NATCHEZ TRIBE— CLASSIFICATION OF EARTHWORKS — REPRESENTATIVE MouUNDs oF TENNESSEE—THE “STONE FoRT’’—CONTENTS OF THE WoRKS— THEIR GREAT AGE. T the time of the discovery of the present State of Tennessee by A white people, the larger part of it, as well as the larger part of the State of Kentucky, was unoccupied by any Indian tribe. The reason of this state of things will appear as the reader proceeds. But although then unoccupied there were found abundant evidences not only of the former presence of Indian tribes but of a stil] more dense and ancient population, possessing a higher degree of civilization, a more highly de- veloped condition of art, agriculture, warfare and religion, than anything of the kind pertaining to any of the aboriginal or Indian tribes. as they are called. These evidences consist of mounds of various shapes and kinds. of fortifications and of burying-grounds, of their contents, relics and re- mains still to be found throughout the valley of the Mississippi, and of the valleys of its tributaries from the Alleghany to the tocky Mountains. and from the Gulf of Mexico to the great lakes, all of which relics and re- mains will be appropriately noticed in the proper connection. But from the existence and frequency of the occurrence of {hese mounds, the orjcin and history of which were at least as inexplicable to the tribes, as to their more intelligent and inductive successors. their erectors and constructors for want of a better name, have been by American histor- 1ans generally called the “Mound Builders.” The most conspicuous exception to this rule is the venerable Bancroft. whose opinions, even if oce aboriginal Indian tt asionally ‘Tronous, are eminently worthy of} profound respect. To the historian and especially to t] even if in less degree to the general student and reader pertinent as to the origin of the first in many years ago wrote: 16 antiquarian. , 1s the inquiry habitants of America, Bancroft ‘““'l'o aid this inquiry the country east of the Missis- sippi has no monuments. The numerous mounds which h ered in the alluvial valleys of the West, h works of an earlier and more eulti ave been discov- ave by some been regarded as the vated race of men, whose citie s have been laid waste, whose language and institutions haye bee n destroyed, or drivenHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 43 away ; but the study of the structure of the earth strips this imposing theory of its marvels. Where imagination fashions relics of artificial walls, geol- g sandstone, clinging like the remains of mortar to blocks of green stone that rested on it; it discovers in parallel in- ogy sees but crumbs of decayin trenchments, a trough that subsiding waters have ploughed through the center of aridge; it explains the tessellated pavement to be but a layer of pebbles aptly joined by water; and, on examining the mounds, and finding them composed of different strata of earth, arranged horizontally to the very edge, ‘+ ascribes their creation to the Power that shaped the globe into vales and hillocks. When the waters had gently deposited their al- Iuvial burden on the bosom of the earth it is not strange'that of the fan- tastic forms shaped by the eddies, some should resemble the ruins of a fortress; that the channel of a torrent should seem even like walls that connected a town with its harbor; that natural cones should be esteemed monuments of inexplicable toil. But the elements as they erumble the mountain, and scatter the decomposed rocks, do not measure their action as men measure the labor of their hands. The hunters of old, as more recently the monks of La Trappe, may have selected a mound as the site of their dwellings, the aid to their rude fortifications, their watch-towers for gaining a vision of God, or more frequently than all as their burying places. Most of the northern tribes, perhaps all, preserved the bones of their fathers; and the festival of the dead was the greatest ceremony of Western faith. When Nature has taken to herself her share in the con- struction of the symmetrical hillocks, nothing will remain to warrant the inference of a high civilization that has left its abodes or died away—ol an earlier acquaintance with the arts of the Old World. That there have been successive irruptions of rude tribes may be inferred from the insulated fragments of nations which are clearly distinguished by their language. The mounds in the valley of the Mississippi have also been used; the smal- ler ones perhaps, have been constructed as burial places of arace, of which the peculiar organization, as seen in the broader forehead, the larger fac- ial angle, the less angular figure of the orbits of the eye, the more narrow nose, the less evident projection of the jaws, the smaller dimensions of the palatine fossa, the flattened occiput, bears a surprisingly exact resem- blance to that of the race of nobles who sleep in the ancient tombs of Peru. Retaining the general characteristics of the red race, they differ obviously from the present tribes of Miamis and Wyandots. These moldering bones from hillocks which are crowned by trees that have de- fied the storms of many centuries, raise bewildering visions of migrations of which no tangible traditions exist; but the graves of earth from which they are dug, and the feeble fortifications that are sometimes found 1n cnr ENA SIE EO eT IOi ] ts 7 { y \ 44 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. the vicinity, afford no special evidence of early connection with other ° 9 continents. ‘Among the more ancient | Works, 1 who is not disposed to undervalue the significancy of these silen i 1u- 4 a | 4 ments, near which he dwells, and which he has carefully explored, ‘there q e TE + 4 NJ al ~ ' ) A is not a single edifice nor any ruins which prove the existence in former | eect 3€ 1 f imperishable materials. No fragment of ages of a building composed of imperishable Is 3 a 7 ms arg’ ; ave be a column, nor a brick, nor a single hewn stone large enough to ave been The only relics* which re- Some of the tribes had savs a caretul observer, incorporated into a wall. has been discovered. main to inflame curiosity are composed of earth. vessels made of clay; near Natchez an image was found of a substance not harder than clay dried in the sun. 3 days may indicate revolutions among the barbarous hordes of the Ameri- they cannot-solve for the inquirer the problem of their These few memorials of other cans themselves; origin.” Thus Bancroft while denying the general proposition that there was in the Mississippi Valley anteriorly to its occupation by Indians, a race of Mound Builders, as that term is generally understood, yet admits that there may have been a race who may have constructed the smaller mounds, as burial places, and whose general physical characteristics bore a strik- ingly exact resemblance to that of the race of nobles who sleep in the ancient tombs of Peru. But other authorities, notably Winchell. the author of ‘ Preadamites,” hold, from the evidences which they have accu- mulated, that not only was the entire eee ae Valley inhabited by an agricultural population of ecreater or less density, but such population possessed an entirely different physic = structure and entire ly different habits and civilization than these eae by the Indian tribes. If the latter were the descendants of the earlier race of Mound Builders suf- ficient time elapsed between them to ¢ hange the stature, cranial dev elop- ment and pursuits. It is well established 4] 1at, while the Indians pro- fessed no knowledge of the construction of the greater number of the mounds, they themselves built them for probably the same purpose as the Mound Builders. Another celebrated American historian, Hildreth, expresses himself with reference to the inferences to be drawn from the existence of the mounds in the following language: ‘These memorials consist of embank ments of earth and stone ex Hibine g indisputable evidence of design and were sometimes of v ery great extent. Some of them were located along the brows of hills or upon the pr ecipitous edges of ravines enclosing consid- erable table-land, and were ev idently designed as works of defense, Others still more numerous, extensive and elaborate w ere most probably con- nected with religious ideas. Inv arious places they present curious basso:TN HI } \\ )) il eh) \ ih | Ky i i ii | Kit | \| AIA M NO HHL > 2 AUN TATH "UtesHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 45 relievos, birds, beasts, reptiles and even men; more generally enclosures of various sorts, perfect circles or squares and parallel lines of great extent, the embankments being from five to thirty feet in height, and the enclosures from one to fifty or even to four hundred acres; other classes of structures connected with or separate from those just mentioned, increasing in number toward the south, conical and pyramidal structures, from a few yards to hundreds in diameter and from ten to ninety feet in height occasionally terraced like the Mexican teocallis. Some of these were for sepulchral purposes, others were doubtless mounds of sacrifice. Connected with these ancient monuments are found remnants of pottery, and weapons and utensils of stone, axes and ornaments of copper; but nothing which indicates a higher civilization than that possessed by the Indians. Yet the extent and number of these earth erections, of which there are but few traces east of the Alleghanies, which region was the most populous when discovered by Europeans, evinces the combined labor of many hands, of a kind of which no trace has ever been found among the aboriginal tribes.” All writers on American antiquities infer from the existence of these antiquities the existence of a race of Mound Builders. Accepting this conclusion as settled there still remain the puzzling problems as to whence they came, how long they remained and when and whither they went, Other authors, besides Judge Haywood, have made strong attempts at a solution from the scanty evidence at hand. His attempt, though exceedingly interesting and ingenious, has not been generally recognized as final. He labors assiduously to show various similarities between the Hindoos and Egyptians, and then to show the similarities between Mexi- cans and Peruvians and the Hindoos and Persians. All of these nations called their rulers the children of the sun. The Mexicans and Hindoos both divided the people into four castes. The state of property was also the same in Persia, Egypt and Peru, one-third set apart as sacred to the God they worshiped, one-third to the sovereign and one-third to the people. The religion of the Mexicans and of the Hindoos was also similar. The Hindoos have a trimurti consisting of Brahma, Vishnu and Siva. From Hindostan this idea or conception of a triune God traveled into Egypt, and thence to the Hebrew nation, Greece and Rome, and if the same deified trinity be found in America it is legitimate to refer it to the same Hindoo origin, at least until a better be assigned. The representations of the Mexican god Hialzettipocli very strikingly resemble that of the Hindoo god Krishna. The masque of the Mexican priest is represented in Mexico. He is drawn as sacrificing a human victim, a sacrifice which all worshipers of the sun everywhere make, 3 = aTT. “Ty et te wt 1 ty Lf a i 46 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The masque represents an elephant’s trunk, similar to the head so often As no elephants exist in America it is seen portrayed in Hindostan. cont Various reasonable to conclude that the design was brought from Asia. coincidences are seized upon to show the possible derivation of the relig- ion of the Mexicans from that of the Hindoos. Among the latter the conch shell is used as a symbolical representation of Vishnu, and also in the worship of that deity. The conch shell is similarly used by the Mex- icans in their worship of the god of the ocean, which they adore equally with the sun. And the little conch shells found in the graves of the ancient inhabitants of the Mississippi Valley indicate similar religious belief and ceremonies. Multitudinous ablutions are alike used by both. The sacred buildings of the Mexicans are similar to the same buildings, and the pyrarids of Egypt and India and the temple of Belus. The tower of Babel and the great temple of Mexico were each dedicated to two divinities. ‘The similarity of the ‘construction of the pyramids of Mexico is worthy of notice, those in both countries being square and so built as to almost exactly face the four cardinal points of the compass; those in Egpyt being precisely coincident with the true meridian, and those in Mexico varying only by fifty-two seconds of are. The cosmical history of the Mexicans is the same as that of the Hindoos. both believ- ing, to illustrate, that the world would be destroyed by a general confla- gration, and mankind having all derived it from the prophecy of Noah.* The vernacular customs of both Hindoos and Mexicans were the same both as to those relative to religion and as to those relating to the com- mon concerns of life. The titles the sun, the brother of the sun, the chil- dren of the sun, were given to the princes of Peru and of Mexico and of the Natchez, and are the same as those anciently given to the princes of Persia, India, Ceylon and China. The Mexican year consisted of 365 days, six hours, and the day began with the rising of the sun, as was like- wise the case with the Persians and Egpytians, as well as the greater part of the nations of Asia. The Egyptians did not know of the year consist- ing of 365 days in the time of Moses nor until 1322 B. C. In the time of Plato, 384 B. C., they discovered that a year consists of 365 days, six hours. The people of America called the constellation now universally known as the Great Bear by a name which signifies the bear, a name first given to this constellation by the Egpytians and some Asiatic people. Such facts as these afford indubitable proof that the astronomy of the Mexicans was not of their own invention, but was learned by them from the countries whence they immigrated. They also were familiar with certain Scriptural traditions; as the fall of man, and the connection of the *Genesis 1x: 11 to 15.HISTORY OF TENNESSER. A? serpent with that fall; of a great flood overwhelming the earth from which only a single family escaped, and also of a great pyramid erected by the pride of man, and destroyed by the anger of the gods. But theyre no tradition of any thing that occurred on the eastern side of the Milentie Ocean later than the building of the tower of Babel. The Mexicans therefore could not have learned them from the writings of Moses or they would also have known of the history of Abraham and of the Israelites as well as of the facts to which such traditions relate. Hence they must have left the Old World before the writings of Moses came mee exist- ence, or they must have lived for a time in some part of Asia, where, on account ot the prevailing idolatry, the writings of Moses could not pene- trate, but yet where they had access to the astronomical learning of the Chaldeans after 384 B. C. | At the time of Moses all the civilized nations of Asia worshiped the sun, as the numerous places named Baal with an affix abundantly testify, as Baalath, Baalpeor, etc., and so far were his many and earnest injunc- tions from subduing their disposition to this worship, that even Solomon, who lived 500 years after Moses’ time, and who was the wisest of princes, embraced the idolatrous worship of the sun. It is fair to presume that sun-worshipers follow the same ‘ustoms all over the world. Sun-wor- shipers, wherever they are known to practice this form of idolatry, build high places, enclosing them in open courts, and upon these high places erect houses for their idols, placing the idols within the houses. Upon these high places they burnt incense to Baal, to the sun, to the moon, to the planets and to the hosts of heaven. Upon these high places they made sacrifices of human beings, even of their sons and daughters, to the sun, and made their children pass through the fire to their idols. In Scotland a ceremony used to be celebrated on the Ist of May (O.8.), the inhabitants of a district assembling in the field, digging out a square trench, in which they built a fire and baked a cake, and then cutting the cake into as many pieces as there were persons, and blacking one with bag, out of which each person, blind- charcoal, all were thrown into a folded, drew a piece, the one drawing the black piece was sacrificed to Baal (some say made to leap through the fire three times) to propitiate him for the coming year. This is the same ceremony as was practiced by Manasseh, the sixteenth King of Judah, who made his sons pass through the fire to Moloch. Certain worshipers of the sun kept the festival of Tammuz, at the time of the summer solstice, the same time at which the southern Indians celebrated the green corn dance The Mexicans had pikes pointed with’ copper which appearec ym of tin, and they had among them car- 1 tO have been hardened with an amalg:sean asinine ~ RES EET: a a eee See he id acca gas ake 48 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The Peruvians used mattocks of penters, masons, weavers and founders. They had the art of smelt- hardened wood and bricks-dried in the sun. ing ore, and of refining silver, of which they made domestic utensils, They had also hatchets of copper made as hard as iron, but they did They carried the idols of the people they conquered not worship idols. Hence the mounds upon which to their temple of the sun at Cusco. 7 images have been found in the Mississippi Valley can not be ascribed to the Peruvians. The question remains, can they be ascribed to the Mex- icans or to a similar race? All the nations west of the Mississippi when they first became known to Europeans were worshipers of the sun, and were governed by despotic princes—two prominent circumstances in which they differed from the Indians who lived on the Great Lakes and on the east side of the Alle- ghanies. At this time the Natchez tribe of Indians occupied almost the entire eastern part of the Mississippi Valley south of the Ohio River, and a portion of that north of this river, and most of the mounds were the limits of their settlements. They were governed by one man who styled himself the child of the sun, or the sun, and upon his breast was the image of that luminary. His wife was called the wife of the sun, and like him was clothed with absolute authority. When either of these rul- ers died, the guards killed themselves in order to attend them in the other world. ‘They had one temple for the entire nation and when on one occa- sion it caught fire, some mothers threw their children into the flames to stop their progress. Some families were considered noble and enjoyed hereditary dignity, while the great body of the people were considered vile. Their great chief, the descendant of the sun, the sole object of their worship, they approached with religious veneration, and honored him as the representative of their deity. In their temples, which were ‘constructed with some magnificence, they kept up a perpetual fire as the purest emblem of their divinity. The Mexicans and the people of Bo- gota were worshipers of the sun and moon, and had temples, altars, priests and sacrifices. The name of the Natchez melted away, and their decline seemed to keep pace with the wasting away of the Mexican em- pire. The Natchez were partially destroyed in a battle with the French, east of the Mississippi, and after their retreat up Red River, west of the Mississippi, they were finally conquered, their women and children re- duced to slavery and distributed among the plantations, and the men themselves sent to serve as slaves in San Domingo. The Natchez were the most highly polished and civilized of any race of Indians. They had an established religion and a regular priesthood, The usual distinctions created by rank were understood and observed, in =. Rite das ae ee Say ae Pe ‘ae 5 ee amHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 49 which particulars they differed from the Indians north of the Ohio and east of the Alleghanies. They were seldom engaged in any but defensive wars and did not deem it glorious to destroy the human species. They were just, generous and humane, and attentive to the wants of the needy; and it is probable they inhabited all the country from the Mississippl eastward to the Alleghanies and northward to the Ohio. In the light of more recent investigations, although Judge Haywood’s line of argument is that necessarily followed by naturalists, and although the facts brought to light by him are yet as valuable as though his theory were impregnable, yet it was necessary for him to assume untenable positions in order to make it appear reasonable that the Natchez were the Mound Builders. In all probability this tribe occupied a territory much smaller than that supposed by him. viz.: the entire eastern half of the Mississippi Valley south of the Ohio River. But even if his supposition in this respect were true, there are many thousands of mounds outside of these limits, in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin. In this latter State the mounds appear to be of a kind peculiar to that location, being so constructed as to show they were designed to be effigies of most of the various kinds of quadrupeds known in the country, as well as fishes, reptiles and birds. Of these perhaps the most remarkable is the ‘Big Klephant Mound.” a few miles below the mouth of the Wisconsin River, in Wisconsin. From its name its form may be inferred. It is 135 feet in length and otherwise properly proportioned. It scarcely seems prob- able that the people who constructed these mysterious mounds could have represented an elephant or a mastodon without having seen one, and it is perhaps justly inferable that the ‘Big Elephant Mound” was con- structed in the days of the mastodon. If this be true it is eloquent in its argument for the immense age of the mounds, as geologists are gen- erally agreed that the mastodon lived not much later than the Pliocene era. Another fact attesting the great age of these most interesting relics is this: The human bones found therein, except those of a later and probably intrusive burial, are not in a condition to admit of removal, as they crumble into dust upon exposure to the air; while human bones are removed entire from British fumuli known to belong to ages older than the Christian era, and frequently from situations much less conducive to preservation than those in the mounds, and in addition the mounds are rarely found upon the most recently formed terraces of the rivers. The selection of sites for the location of these mounds appears to have been guided by the location of soils capable of cultivation, and by accessibility to navigabie streams ; the same situations have since fre- ? quently been selected by pioneers of civilization as the centers of settle- _ a pins - = i — — es- Ai EPO IE ae at i # ) te SS 5) HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ment and trade. While the purpose for which some of these mounds were erected is sometimes doubtful, as is the case with the “animal mounds” in Wisconsin, a few in Ohio, and some in the valley of the Arkan- sas, yet as to many of them which have been carefully explored there is jess Hoabh and they are divided according to the uses to which they were | pore tal eke ena annessee belong to one probably devoted. All the earthw orks found in Tennessee belong to o1 of the classes below. Cumberland, on both Big and Little Tennessee, on French Broad,on Duck The earthworks have been classified by an eminent anti- Mounds are numerous in West Tennessee, on the and on the Elk. quarian* as follows: ( Sepulchral. | Templar. { Mounds 4 Sacrificial. | Memorial. | | Observatory. ee Animal. EARTHWORKS. | Effigies + Emblematic. | Symbolical. Military. | Inclosures + Covered. ! Sacred. One of these mounds is in the immediate vicinity of Nashville, upon which Monsieur Charleville, the French trader, had his store in (14s when the Shawanee Indians were driven away by the Cherokees and Chick- asaws. Very large burying grounds lay between this mound and the river; thence westwardly and then to the creek. The great extent of the burying ground, and the vast number of interments therein, induce the belief that a population once resided there many times greater than that how occupying that portion of the State, and suggested the idea that the cemetery was in the vicinity of the mound because the mound was used tor religious purposes. About fourteen miles up the Cumberland above Nashville is a mound twelve to thirteen feet high. Upon excavation ashes were found mixed with lime and substances resembling human. bodies after being burned. o On Big Harpeth River, near the mouth of Dog Creek, is a square mound, 47x47 feet and 25 feet high and in a row with it two others from » to 10 feet high. At some distance are thres others in a row parallel with the first, the space between resembling a public square. All around the bend of the river. except at a place of entrance, is a wall on the mar- gin of the river, the mounds being within the area enclosed by the wall. Within this space is a reservoir of water about fifteen feet square. On the top of the large mound was found an image eighteen inches long from head to foot composed of soapstone. ‘I'he trees standing upon the mounds are very old: a poplar tree was five or six feet in diameter. *Isaac Smucker in “Ohio Statistics.” TS ane tela i asi aeatelinisieiiguasindisantbmunsinssaasuuaasoabocie coin aa” ——— ee A nA eee eneteneeeteeeeenceenereensessenenseeeemeeeepeenesteeenneeee. Soccer ee arteries So ee Opa a eae a ee ‘ = <1 ape 7 ee ~HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. D I Higher up the river and within a mile of those just described is another bend in the river. In this bend, on the south side of the river, is a mound of the same size as the larger one described above. Near this mound were found a large number of pine knots. As there were then no pine woods within five or six miles it is supposed that these pine knots are the remains of the old field pines, which grew to full size after cultivation had deserted this region, and falling there decayed. The soil renewed its richness, and the present growth, consisting of oaks, poplars and maples, succeeded that renewal. Allowing 250 years for the growth of the pines, 50 years for the renewal of the soil and 350 years for the present growth, 650 years have passed since the commencement of the growth of the pines. Hence those pines must have begun to grow about the year 1240, which again shows the great age of the mounds. In Sumner County, in a circular enclosure between Bledsoe’s Lick and Bledsoe’s Spring branch, is a wall from fifteen to eighteen inches high, with projecting angular elevations of the same height, the wall enclosing about sixteen acres. Within the enclosure is araised platform from thirteen to fifteen feet above the common surface, about 200 yards from the south wall. This platform is sixty yards wide, is level on the top and joins a mound which is twenty feet square and eighteen feet above the common level. In 1785 a black oak tree three feet through was growing on the top of this mound: About 1815 there was plowed up on top of the mound an image made of sandstone. The breast was that of a female and prominent, and the color was that of a dark infusion of coffee. Near this mound was a cave, which at the time of its discovery contained a great number of human skulls, without the appearance of any other portions of the human skeleton near them. Tn Williamson County, northwardly from Franklin, on the north side of Little Harpeth, are walls of dirt running north from the river. In 1821 they were four or five feet high, and from 400 to 500 yards long, the inclosure containing about fifty acres. Within this inclosure are three mounds standing in a row from north to south, all nearly of the same size. Within this inclosure is a large number of graves, some of the bones in which were very large. In the same county on the south side of Big Harpeth, about three miles from Franklin, is an ancient entrenchment nearly in the form of a semi-circle, containing about twenty acres. Within the inclosure made by this entrenchment and the bluff are several mounds of different shapes and sizes, from six to ten feet high and from ten. to twelve yards wide. Besides these are other mounds nearly round and ten yards in diameter. The largest of the mounds of the first class is sixty-eight feet wide and eS va eacareemeeaa te A TS re tT ENE ETT Ee te eee OE eee52, HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 148 feet long and about ten feet high. ‘The trees within the enclosure are as large as those of the surrounding country. In Hickman County, at the junction of Piney River with Duck River, is an enclosure containing twenty-five or thirty mounds, one of which is about fifteen feet high, round and somewhat raised on top, but yet flat enough to build a house on. At the base it is about thirty or forty yards across. ‘There arenumerous mounds in the bottoms of Duck River, and caves containing human bones. In Lincoln County, near Fayetteville, below the mouth of Norris Creek, are a wall and a ditch proceeding from a point on the river circu- larly till it returns to the river, forming an enclosure of about ten acres. Within this enclosure are mounds six or eight feet high. On the outside of the wall and joined to it are angular projections about 180 feet apart and extending outward about ten feet. On one of these angular pro- jections stood a black oak tree, which, when cut down, exposed 260 annu- lar rings. In Warren County are numerous mounds fifteen feet high. Hight miles south from McMinnville, on Collins River, is a mound thirty feet high, with a flat top, containing about one and a half acres of cround, On either side of the mound toward the north and south is a ditch about twenty feet wide and four feet deep at present, extending parallel and terminating at each end at a high bluff. On the mounds were large stumps indicating trees of a very great age. In Roane County is a mound thirty feet high, haying a flat top and a regular ascent from bottom to top. The summit contains one-fourth of an acre, and all around the summit there was a stone wall about two feet high. It is on the south side of the Tennessee River. Across the Tennessee facing the mound is a high bluff, upon which three figures are painted with black and red colors from the waist upward. One of the figures is that of a female. On the French Broad River, about one mile above the mouth of the Nollichucky, is a mound thirty feet high, with old trees at the top. In the third section of the fourth range of the Tenth District of the Chickasaw Purchase are seven mounds, one of them seventeen feet high and about 140 feet across. Seven miles southwest of Hatchie River and about fifty miles east of the Mississippi, in a fertile part of the country, are three mounds enclosed by an intrenchment from ten to thirty feet wide. } Two miles south of the south fork of Forked Deer River and about fifty miles east of the Mississippi, is a mound fifty-seven feet high and U feet across. On the south side of Forked Deer River, about forty miles west of the Tennessee, is a mound about 100 rods in diameter © | @ ey ho SS kt © @O ce a oO Fy D ND j i i \F Ok } H t i A ' 7 7 ; ’ | ' { y H ‘i Bf : | j ‘ f € \} fl Big f ' f } er ; tee fF iH . ie i } t = , j ae) et = Pt ‘ } PSR TH estetarrenesatN TEP NEL ad i inna “ofl ai " * ns + 2 Bite hg OTe eu Re Pee ty: lo ea aaHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. at the base, the summit containing about four acres, and in this part of the country are a great number of mounds besides. : On the north bank of the Holston River five miles above the mouth of French Broad, are six mounds on half an acre of ground, irregularly scattered. The bases of these mounds are from ten to thirty feet in diameter, the largest one ten feet high. Near these mounds on a bluff 100 feet high are painted in red -colors the figures of the sun and moon, birds, fishes, ete. ; The contents of the mounds are sometimes of considerable interest, In 1821 the Charleville mound near Nashyille was opened, and pottery of Indian fabrication was found, as also the jaw bone of some aalenowi carniverous animal, and small fragments of bones thought to be human, About four feet from the summit was found a layer of charcoal about two ‘nehes thick and extending outward from the center of the mound from eight to ten feet. The inference was that a fire had been built on top of the mound, and after the fuel had been consumed, fresh dirt carried in earthen jars and laid on the ashes before they had time to blow away, the fragments of these jars being seen through every. part of the mound. The object for which the mound was raised can only be conjectured. It could not have been for a throne for the ruler of the nation, for savages are not thus devoted to their leaders. It could not have been for mili- tary purposes, for to be placed on the mound would be only to be more exposed to the enemy's missiles. It could not have been for a tower, for there was no narrow pass near it to be guarded. It therefore seems prob- able that it could only be for religious purposes. In the mounds near Bledsoe’s Lick (Castalian Springs), in Sumner County, were found ashes, pottery ware, flint, muscle shells, periwinkles, coal, ete. In making an excavation in one of these mounds there was found two feet below the surtace alayex of, ashes fourteen inches thick. In proceeding downwa rd:threare wee foans 4wenty eight layers of ashes, alter- ashes being, of 8, blackish color. Ateight feet below vind was’ found, blid skpteton ofa child, the surround- of careful burial. | The skeleton was in quite a de- apable of holding about nating with clay, the the summit of the PAC ings bearing evidence cayed state. At its feet was a jug of sand-stone ¢ Small pieces of decayed human bones were also found, and also animal with a tusk attached, the tusk being There were found also the bones pth of eighteen feet, and pottery, At the depth of small pieces of a gallon. the jaw-bone of some unknown of the same form as that of the mastodon. of birds, arrow points, and flints at the de some of which was glazed, isinglass, and burnt corn-cobs. nineteen feet were found a piece of a corn-cob and some cedar almost entirely decayed. eee eee oa| Near Nashville, probably about the year 1800, there was dug up an | image. ‘The base of this image was a flat circle from which rose a some- | what elongated globular figure terminating at the top with the figure of | Qo | a | a i . iil 54 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. i: | i | | a female head. The features of the face were Asiatic. probably a resem- blanee of the Mound Builders themselves. The crown of the head was covered with a cap or ornament, shaped into a pyramidal figure, with a flattened circular summit ending at the apex in a rounded button. i Another image was found about twelve miles south from Nashville, of sculptured stone, representing a woman sitting with hands under her t chin and elbows on her knees. It was well proportioned, neatly formed | and highly polished. Two others were found near Clarksville, one of an i old man the other of an old woman. In 1883 a roughish stone image = oe ay a a Waa eS ———— ip was found on the farm of Dr. W. H. Garman, seven miles from Franklin, | Williamson County. This is the image of a person sitting with limbs drawn close to the body and hands upon knees, and with the features resembling somewhat the supposed appearance of the Mound Builders. H This image is now in the possession of the Tennessee Historical Society at Nashville. In a cave about six miles from Carthage on the Cumberland River were found a number of human skeletons, one of which was that of a female with yellow hair, and haying around the wrist a silver clasp with letters in- scribed resembling those of the Greek alphabet. This was in 1815. But | perhap the most interesting relics found in Tennessee. in the form of human | skeletons, were discovered in 1811 in a cave in Warren County, about | twenty miles from McMinnville. These were of two human beings, one male the other female. They had been buried in baskets the construc- tion of which was evidence of considerable mechanical skill. Both bodies | were dislocated at the hips and were placed erect in the baskets, each of which had a neatly fitting cover of bane, «The flesh‘of these persons was entire and undecayed, dry ahd of ‘a brown color: ‘Around the female, next i to her body, was placed a well dressed depr-skin, ‘and: next to this was a | mantle composed of the bark of: 4 tree’ and feathers the bark being com- posed of small strands well twisted. The mantle or rug was about six i feet long and three feet wide. She had in her hand a fan made from the | tail feathers of a turkey, and so made as to be opened and closed at pleas- i . eat it a Tn 7 | mae 1 : 2 ° | ure. The hair remaining on the heads of both was entire, and that upon i Ae +f a" - € , . - o 2 | the head of the female. who appeared to have been about fourteen years | old at the time of her death, was of a yellow color and a very fine texture. | if | Hence the individuals were thought to have been of European or Asiatic ! io With reference to the mantles in which these bodies were te I enclosed it may be remarke sabes eee | | | enclosed 1t may be remarked that the Florida Indians met with by De ’ | fl | i | e = e { \ a. | | aS eyHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. DD Soto in his wanderings “adorned themselves with mantles made of feathers, or in a textile fabric of some woody fiber,” and ‘wore shoes and clothing made from skins which they dressed and colored with great skill.”’* Tt appears also that certain Indians were acquainted with some kind of rude art of preserving the bodies of the dead, for, in 1528, Pamphilo de Narvaez and his company in a reconnoissance along the coast near Tampa Bay, Fla., ‘““came upon a little Indian village, where they found some bodies in a sort of mummified condition, the sacred remains, no doubt, of the ancestors of the chiefs of the tribe.” t Thus the mantles and the mummified condition of these bodies might perhaps be considered suffi- ciently accounted for, but there remains the question of the color and fineness of the texture of the hair to be solved. Numbers of the constructions by the Mound Builders were evidently for other than sacrificial or religious purposes. On the south branch of Forked Deer River between the Tennessee and Mississippi Rivers is the appearance of what the people there call an ancient fortification. It is 250 yards square. The wall is made of clay and is eight feet above the general level. Trees as large as any in the surrounding county are growing on the top and sides of the wall. Within this wall is an ancient mound eighty-seven feet high, cireular in form except at the top where it is square and fifty feet each way. In Stewart County, near the junction of Spring Branch with Wells Creck is a fortification about nimety feet square, with bastions twelve feet square at the opposite corners. Large white oak and hickory trees are growing on the walls and bastions. But perhaps the most interesting of all the ancient constructions in Tennessee is what is everywhere known as the “Old Stone Fort.” This fort is in Coffee County, at the verge of the highlands one mile from Manchester, just above the junction of Barren Fork and Taylor’s Fork of Duck River. The fort itself is in the form of an irregular oval. On the east and west sides of it the water falls from precipice to precipice until the fall is 100 feet in a half mile. The fortis a wonderful struc- ture. The walls are composed of boulders, conglomerate and debris from the beds of the two streams, and earth. The embankment has a base of thirty feet and when built it was doubtless higher than the men who made it. ‘The amount of material which entered into its construction is immense, and a corresponding amount of labor was required to do the work. Thirty years ago the ground was very heavily timbered with poplar, chestnut and hickory, ranging from three to five feet in diameter. Trees as large as could be found anywhere in the vicinity were standing *Bryant. 7 fIbid.a a ee ered Leva We yee, a 56 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. immediately on the embankment, and it is manifest that at the time of the building of the fort there was not a tree nor shrub to be found in the vicin- ity. In the diagram A repre- sents the entrance into the fort, B a semi-circular embankment to cover the entrance, and C an excavation about 100 feet deep extending from one river to the other. Whether this excavation was made by man or nature can not now be known, but specula- tion favors the hypothesis that it was made by man. The an- tiquity of the fort is indubit- able. Nothing has ever been found about the fort to furnish the least clue to its origin. It could not have been, as has been suggested, the work of De Soto and his men, for in the first place they were probably much farther south when they passed its longitude, and second it would have required half a life- time to do the work, and then they would have had no use for it when made. In addition to these considerations it is shown to have been in existence before De Soto visited this country. On the 7th of August, 1819, Col. Andrew Erwin, on whose land the fort was, caused to be cut down a white oak tree. Maj. Murray and himself counted 357 annular rings in this tree, which was growing on the wall. How long it was after the builk ling of the wall before the tree began to grow it is of course impossible to know. It may have been one hundred or a thousand years. But if no interval be allowed, which however cannot be supposed, the fort can not have been erected later than 357 years previous to 1819, or 1462, thirty years before Columbus-discovered America, and sev enty-eight years before De Soto made his famous tour of exploration. Thus again do we arrive at an immense age for these wor ks, and it is also fair to presume that the fort was built when this sec tion of the countr y was thickly inhabited. Many other remains and relics of great interest, especially to the anti-Ol =~] HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. quarian, have been found within this State. Enough has been presented to show that the Mound Builders, whencesoever and whenever they may have come, were a humerous, intelligent, religious, agricultural and, to a considerable degree, a warlike people, at least so far as defensive wars are concerned; that they occupied the country probably for many centur- ies; that they were driven out by arace superior in numbers and probably in the art of war, but inferior in intellect; that they can scarcely have lived in this country later than 1,000 or 1,200 A. D.; that when driven out they probably moved southward into Mexico, Central and South Am- erica, and they may possibly have been the ancestors of, or have been absorbed by, some Central American or South American race. CHAPTER III. THE INDIAN RACES—DIALECTS AND TRADITIONS—GEOGRAPHICAL TRIBAL Lo- CATION—F RENCH AND SPANISH SprTTLEMENTS—ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FIRST ForRT—SAVAGE ATROCITIES—THE FORT LOUDON MASSACRE—DESTRUCTION OF INDIAN VILLAGES AND FIELDS—* THE BELOVED TOWN ”—PEACE AND CES- SION TTREATIES—BATTLE OF PoInT PLEASANT—BORDER W ARS—EXPEDITIONS OF RUTHERFORD AND CHRISTIAN—“ THE LOWER TOWNS”—SEVIER’S CAM- PAIGNS—RESERVATIONS AND BOUNDARY LINES—THRILLING FRONTIER INCI- DENTS—INDIAN AFFAIRS ON THE CUMBERLAND—ROBERTSON’S EXERTIONS— THE COLDWATER AND NICKAJACK EXPEDITIONS—TREATY STIPULATIONS— THE Unicor TURNPIKE CoMPANY—THE HIWASSEE LANDS—THE WESTERN PuRCHASE—EXODUS. HE race of red men having the earliest claim to the territory now em- braced within the limits of Tennessee, was the Iroquois, or Confeder- acy of Six Nations, though it was for the most part unoccupied by them. The Achalaques had a kind of secondary, or perhaps it may be called permissory claim toit. In Schooleraft’s great work on the Indian races of North America is a map showing the location of the various Indian tribes in the year 1600, which, if authentic, proves that the Achalaques then occupied most of Tennessee east of the Tennessee River, and also small portions of Georgia and Alabama, and a considerable portion of Kentucky. ‘The ancient Achalaques were the same tribe or nation as the modern Cherokees. They have no lin their language, and hence substitute the letter 7 therefore, in a manner similar to that in which the modern Chinaman substitutes i for ‘chen by a Lew other slight and obvious changes the name Cherokee is easily obtained. But the, first actual Indian occupants of this territory, of which history or tradition fur-' F ' ge - > ao. infill oe yee lee O8 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. nishes any account, were the Shawanees, or Shawanoes as they were earlier known. With respect to the origin of the Shawanees it 1s proper to observe that they and the Algonquins are the only tribes of Indians, having a tradition of an origin from beyond the seas—of a landing from a sea voy- age. John Johnson, Esq., who was for many years prior to 1820 agent 1819. that they for the Shawanees, observes, in a letter dated July 7, migrated from west Florida and parts adjacent to Ohio and Indiana, where they were then located: “The people of this nation have a tradition that their ancestors ecrosss the sea. They are the only tribe with which [ am acquainted who a mit a foreign origin. Until lately they kept yearly sacrifices for their d » qa LA > safe arrival in this country. From where they came or at what period they arrived in America they do not know. It is a prevalant opinion among them that white people had inhabited Florida who had the use of iron tools. Blackhoof, a celebrated Indian chief, informs me that he has even heard it spoken of by old people that stumps of trees covered with earth were frequently found which had been cut down with edged tools.” 17 About the year 1600 the Five Nations were settled near the site of Montreal. Canada. having come probably from the north or northwest. There were among them, as well as among other races, several traditions relative to the extirpation of an ancient race of people. The tradition of the Indians northwest of the Ohio was that Kentucky had been inhab- ited by white people, and that they had been exterminated by war. The Sac Indians had a tradition that Kentucky had been the scene of much blood. The ancient inhabitants, they said, were white, and possessed arts of which the Indians were entirely ignorant. Col. McGee was told by an Indian that it was a current tradition among the Indians that Ohio iG Kentucky had once been inhabited by white people who possessed arts not understood by the Indians, and that after many severe conflicts they had been exterminated. The various sources from which this tradition comes is evidence of its very general existence among the Aborigines more, perhaps, than of its truth. The Shawanees, who came from the Savannah River, whose name was once the Savannachers, and after whom the Savannah River received i 4. Un» name, at one time claimed the lands on the Cumberland River. This was. however, at a later period in their history, when their name had been changed from the Savannachers to the Shawanoes. The French called both the tribe and the river the Chauvanon, or Shauyanon. The Chero- kees, as was stated above, also asserted a claim to the same land, bué al- TOVS g0Ak fs ric o * . : ways. acknoy ledged the superior claim of the Iroquois, who themselves apne =e a TS SS SSS aeceraeta ee or i ie Se aces Ge = Pa ; Aye mp z eee a ae waeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Ol claimed the country by right of conquest. For many years both Shaw- nees and Cherokees maintained against each other a bloody contest for its possession; but being so nearly equal in strength and prowess, neither could gain any decided advantage over the other. At length both na- tions, fearing the results of a continuation of the conflict, refrained from going upon the lands between the Cumberland and the Kentucky and % Ohio, for which reason this | eautiful section of the country became an immense, luxuriant park, abounding in game of every kind perfectly safe from the arrows of the savages, who fearfully observed this as a neutral ground. When this great and unusual abundance’of game became known to white hunters belonging to the English and French pioneers, they soon began to resort thither for the purpose of enriching fyemeclnes with the skins and furs of the bear. the deer, the otter and the mink, to to be so easily and so plentifully obtained. Gen. Robertson learned that about a century anda half before his time the Shawanees had by degrees returned to the lands on the Cumberland, were scattered to the west- ward as far as the Tennessee, and even considerably to the north. About the year 1710, being much harassed by the Cherokees, they came to the determination to permanently leave the country. The Chickasaws were at that time occupying the country to the south- west, in the western part of Tennessee and the northern part of Mississippl. According to their own tradition they came from west of the Mississippi. When about to start eastward from their ancient home they were provided with a large dog as a guard and a pole as a oulde. The dog would give them warning of the approach of an enemy, to defend themselves against whom they could then prepare. The pole they set up in the ground every night, and the next morning they would look at it and go in the direction it leaned. They continued their journey thus until they crossed the Mississippi River, and until they arrived on the waters of the Ala- bama where Huntsville is now located. There the pole was unsettled for several days, but finally becoming steady it leaned in a northwest direc- tion, and in consequence they resumed their journey toward the north- west, planting the pole every night as before until they arrived at the place called * Ghickasaw Old Fields,” where the pole stood perfectly erect. All then came to the eonclusion that they had reached the promised land. In this location they remained until 1837 or 1838, when they migrated west of the State of Arkansas. When the pole was in its unsettled condition a part of the tribe moved on eastward and joined the Greeks. They always afterward declined the invitation to reunite with the majority of their tribe, but always remained friendly until they had sntercourse with the whites. The great dog was“ ae — : oe ial anata ee SRI Bi Se ya i ee 60 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. lost in crossing the Mississippi, and the Chickasaws always believed that he fell into a large sink-hole and there remained. They said they could hear him howl at night, and so long as this continued whenever they took any scalps from an enemy they sent boys back with the scalps to uhrow to the dog. In traveling from the West they have no recollection of hay- ing crossed any large stream of water except the Mississipp1. Upon leay- ing the West they were informed they might look for white people, that these white people would come from the East, and that they were to be on their guard against them lest they should become contaminated with all the vices the whites ‘possessed. The Shawanees, it is believed, came to this country about the year 1650, and in 1710 or thereabouts, when they determined to leave it forever on account of the frequent harassments to which they were subjected by the Cherokees, the Chickasaws, for some reason which does not appear, united with the Cherokees, the hereditary enemies of the Shawanees, for the purpose of striking a decisive blow and thus making themselves mas- ters of the situation. In pursuance of this design a large body of Chicka- saws repaired to the Cumberland just above the mouth of Harpeth, where they attacked the Shawanees, killed a large number of them and took trom them all their property. The remnant of the tribe made their way north- ward as best they could. The claim of the Cherokees to the land north of the Cumberland was not considered as perfect even by themselves. This became apparent at the treaty of Fort Stanwix, which was made November 5, 1768. This treaty was made between Sir William Johnson, superintendent for north- ern Indian affairs, representing the King of Great Britain, and 3,200 Indians of seventeen different tribes—the Six Nations, and tribes tribu- tary to that confederacy, or occupying territory contiguous to territory occupied by them. In this treaty the delegates of the respective na- tions aver that “they are the true and absolute proprietors of the lands thus ceded,” and that for the consideration mentioned they con- tinued the line south to Cherokee or Hogohegee* River, because the same is and we declare it to be our true bounds with the southern Indians. and that we have an undoubted right to the country as far south as that river.” Some visiting Cherokees, who were present at the treaty, on their arrival at Fort Stanwix, having killed some game on the NT for their support, tendered the skins to the Six Nations, saying, “they are yours, we killed them after passing the Big River,” the name be which they always called the Tennessee. By the treaty at Fort orane — “ wix the right to the soil and sovereignty was vested in the king of * Holston.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 6] Great ‘tain. and bv 4 Pits C01 TO i oe t oat Britain, and. by the treaty of 1783 the king of Great Britain resigned his sovereignty in the lands, and thus they became the property ~ ; _ ‘ « . * e ® “ : al: ies of those States within whose limits they happened then to be Talay Nie T ° . While the Six Nations claimed the lands only by the right of con wv Vv Oo - A a quest, uhte Cherokees had long exercised the privilege of using them as a hunting ground, and naturally, therefore, regarded with jealousy the encroachments of the whites. John Stuart, superintendent of Southern Indian Affairs, was, therefore, instructed to assemble the southern In- dians for the purpose of establishing a boundary line with them, and concluded a treaty with the Cherokees at Hard Labour, S. C., October 14, 1768. By this treaty it was agreed that the southwestern boundary of Virginia should be a line “extending from the point where the norte ern line of North Carolina intersects the Cherokee hunting grounds, about thirty-six miles east of Long Island, on the Holston River, and thence extending in a direct course north by east to Chiswell’s Mine, on the east bank of Kanawha River, and thence down that stream to its junction with the Ohio.”’ i Having thus traced the Iroquois and Shawanees to their departure from the State, the former by treaty with Great Britain, and the latter by expulsion by the Cherokees and Chickasaws, there now remain, to treat of in this chapter the Creeks—or as they were originally known, the Muscogees—the Choctaws and Chickasaws, the three leading tribes or nations of the Appalachian group, which in early Indian times, just previous to the dawn of history in this State, occupied Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and the western part of Tennessee, and the Achal- aques or Cherokees, who ostensibly occupied Eastern and Middle Ten- nessee and small portions of Georgia, Alabama and Kentucky. Perhaps the earliest exploits of the Creeks and Cherokees desirable to mention in this work, were their alliances with the whites im Lil, about the time of the expulsion of the Shawanees from the Cumberland, when the Tuscaroras, Corees and other tribes combined for the extermin- ation of the settlers’ on the Roanoke, their attempt resulting in the massacre of 137 white people. The details of this: disaster reaching Charleston, Gov. Craven sent Col. Barnwell with 600 militia and 400 Indians went to the relief of the survivors, the 400 Indians consisting in part of Creeks and Cherokees. The Tuscaroras and Corees were sub- dued, the hostile portion of the former tribe migrated to the vicinity of «. Oneida Lake, and then became the sixth nation of the Iroquois .Con- federacy. In about four years after the suppression of the Tuscaroras, all the Tndian tribes from Florida to Cape Fear united in a confederacy for 4aa es ' a ii igi | i i i: 62 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. | ss = . a , r 1 7 ¥ > - ¥«¢ °° 2 the destruction of the white settlements in Garolina. This confede1 ACY nf was composed of the Catawbas, Congarees, Creeks, Cherokees, and Yamassees. It is believed they were instigated to the course they pur- } sued by the Spaniards, as they had just received guns and ammunition After spreading desolation and death for some time } If { ; from St. Augustine. i through the unsuspecting settlements, the confederacy was met by . Gov. Craven at Salkehatchie, defeated and driven across the Savannah " River. The French were at this time erecting forts in various parts of the Southwest: Paducah at the mouth of the Cumberland; Assumption, on Chickasaw Bluff; besides others, and numerous trading posts on the Tennessee. The English and French colonists were each seeking to i ingratiate themselves with the various Indian tribes with with the view of attaching to themselves as many of the one TOP ke SO ee —— a which they ar came in contact, ' I the Indians as possible and of thus obtaining advantages | over the other. In pursuance of this policy Gov. Nicholson, in 1721, A | | invited the Cherokees to a general conference, in order to establish a | if | treaty of commerce and friendship. In response to this invitation the | chieftains of thirty-seven different towns attended the conference, at | which Goy. Nicholson made them presents, laid off their boundaries, and appointed an agent to superintend their affairs. Similar measures Ft were taken with the Creeks. In 1730 the projects of the French with | reference to uniting Louisiana and Canada began to be more notice- | ably developed. They had already made many friends among the i Indians west of Carolina, and in order to counteract their influence au Great Britain sent out Sir Alexander Cumming to treat with the it Cherokees, who then occupied the lands about the head waters of the ei) ia | Savannah River, and backward from the Appalachian chain of moun- i i tains. This tribe was then computed to consist of more than 20,000 i | | individuals, 6,000 of whom were warriors. Sir Alexander met the os | chiefs in April of the year last mentioned at Nequassee, all the towns ' th | sending in representatives or delegates. Nequassee was near the i , i fi sources of the Hiwassee. A treaty of friendship, alliance and com- 4 | merce was drawn up and formally executed, in consequence of which a condition of peace and friendship continued to exist for some time be- tween the colonists and this tribe. Two years afterward Goy. Ogle- thorpe effected a treaty with the Lower and Upper Creeks, a nOnenel regate about 25,000 souls. These tt | aT eas : tribe then numbering in the agg 7 < Ac ae ~ na A Sa ee e alliances with the Cherokees and Creeks promised security to the col- onists from the encroachments from the Spanish and French in Florida and Louisiana. ; vi ; ae * y i = pia ks een aeHISTORY OF TENNESSEBR. 63 In 1740 the Cherokee Indians marked out a path from Augusta to their nation, so that horsemen could ride from Savannah to all the Indian nations. In 1750 a treaty was made by Col. Waddle and the chief, Attakullakulla, in behalf of the Cherokee nation, in accordance with which Fort Dobbs was built about twenty miles from Salisbury, N. C., and near the Yadkin; but the Indians paid but little attention to the treaty, as they killed some people the next spring near the Catawba. In 1755 Gov. Glenn, of South Carolina, met the Cherokee warriors and chiefs in their own country, and made a treaty with them at which a ces- sion of considerable territory was made to the King of Great Britain and deeds of conveyance formally executed in the name of the whole people. In 1756 the Karl of Loudon, commander of the King’s troops in America, sent Andrew Lewis to erect a stone fort on the Tennessee River, at the head of navigation. It was erected about thirty miles from the present site of Knoxville, and was named Fort Loudon in honor of the Earl. This fort was garrisoned with about 200 men, the exis- tence of the fort and the presence of the troops giving great uneasiness to the Indians. In the spring of 1758 the settlement around Fort Lou- don, by the arrival of hunters and traders, soon grew into a thriving yil- lage. During this year the British captured Fort Du Quesne, the En- glish Army being commanded by Gen. Forbes, and immediately after its capitulation the name was changed to Fort Pitt, in honor of the great commoner of England. In the army of Gen. Forbes were several Cher- okees, who had accompanied the provincial troops of North and South Carolina. The disaffection among the Cherokees already existing was unfortunately suddenly and largely increased by a serious occurrence in the back parts of Virginia. Returning home through this part of the country, the Cherokees, who had lost some horses on the expedition to Fort Du Quesne, stole such as they found running at large. This action of theirs was resented by the Virginians killing twelve or fifteen of the Cherokees, which ungracious conduct from allies whose frontier the Cherokees had aided to defend, at once aroused a spirit of resentment and revenge. The garrison of Fort Loudon, consisting of about 200 men, under the command of Capts. Demeré and Stuart, on account of its remoteness from white settlements, was the first to notice and suffer from the retaliatory proceedings of the Cherokees. Soldiers making ex- cursions into the woods to procure fresh supplies of provisions were attacked by the Indians, and some of them killed. From this time it became necessary tor them to confine themselves within the narrow limits of the fort. The sources of their provisions being cut off, there seemed no prospect before them but famine and death. Parties of warriors —————<<—— ee ri : ¥ Fy nitaagpassesicaemmaeig™ aces asianate =a et a ATED ae Thatith erent Tipu HU ny rT oO > a ale Ae = See SS a a an a eee ES 64 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. he settlements along the border, and the work of al among the frontier settlements. and the decline of the power of a fundamental change occurred in the relations of the é . * r he French and English nations. The north- the French, but now the French, for them to rushed down upon t; massacre became gener After the fall of Fort Du Quesne, France in America northern Indian tribes to t; ern tribes had hitherto been allied to he English, it became necessary But the southern tribes re- he power of the French. At having been overcome by t - transfer their allegiance to the Eng scent and relied for security on t herokees extended from Fort Ninety-six on branch of lish. mained quie this time the territory of the C the Carolina frontier and Fort Prince George on the Keowee the Savannah to the source of that river and across the Appalachian chain of mountains to and down the Cherokee or Tennessee River and its southern branches, a country replete with every resource required for the sustenance of savage life and customs. Gov. Lyttleton hearing of the investment of Fort Loudon, the outrages along the border, summoned the militia to assemble at Con- garee, for the purpose of ¢ called together some of the head men of the nation and of hastising the enemy, but previous to assuming offensive measures, and made with them a treaty, which after reciting reference to former treaties, which had been violated by the Indians, proceeded with com- mendable precision to rehearse grievances of a still later date, for all of which the Cherokees promised to make amend, and also promised good eonduct for the future. murders were actually delivered up, and the surrender of twenty more was promised, to be kept as hostages until the same number of Indians guilty of murder, should be delivered up, and that the Cherokees should Ses . kill or take prisoner every Frenchman that should presume to come into the nation. This treaty was signed by Attakullakulla and five other prin- cipal chiefs on the part of the Cherokees. and by Gov. Lyttleton. His purpose haying been accomplished, and peace restored as he supposed = / w ’ s NOs ANAT rAaAT . ay - \harlacd / a = the Governor returned to Charleston, and the Indians reeommenced their It has been well said by a writer on American history Two of their own nation who had committed depredations. that the Indians are of such a nature that unless they feel the rod of chastisement, they cannot believe in the power to inflict it; and accord- ingly whenever they happen to be attacked unprepared they have resource to a treaty of peace as a subterfuge, in order to gain Pimento collect them- selves. Th *n without the least regard to the bonds of public faith, they renew their hostilities on the first opportunity, Possibly, however, there may be some little palliation for their perfidy with reference to this treaty with Goy. Lyttleton signed by the six Cherokees, when it is consid,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 6} ered that only this small number signed it, and that the treaty itself was not in accordance with the sentiments of the tribe. This became pain- fully evident immediately after the departure of the Governor from Fort Prince George and the dispersion of his army. Hostilities were at once renewed and fourteen whites killed within a mile of the fort. On the {8th of: February, 1760, the Cherokees assembled at the fort on the Keowee, and attempted to surprise it. As the garrison was gazing at the forces from the ramparts, a noted chief, Oconostota, approached and expressed a desire to speak to the commandant, Lieut. Coytmore, who agreed to meet him on the bank of the Keowee River, whither he was accompanied by Ensign Bell and the interpreter, Mr. Coharty. Ocon- ostota said he wished to go down to see the Governor and requested that a white man be permitted to go with him. This request being acceded to he said to an Indian “‘Go and catch a horse for me.” This was objected to. but the chief making a faint motion carelessly swung a bridle, which he held. three times around his head. This being a secret signal to men lying concealed, a volley was poured in which mortally wounded Coytmore, who received a ball in his breast, and inflicted deep flesh wounds on others. This treachery of Oconostota so aroused the indignation of Ensign Miln, commanding the garrison of the fort, that he determined to put the as well as the two murderers in irons; but the first attempt to seize the assassins was so successfully resisted that the soldier deputed to effect it was instantly killed and another wounded. This so exasperated the at they immediately put to death all the hostages. This act of followed by a general ‘nvasion of the frontier of Carolina, twenty hostages garrison th retaliation was and an indiscriminate slaughter of men, women and children. Measures were taken as soon as practicable to punish and restrain these excesses by collecting together a large force of men and sending them fons ward under Col. Montgomery for the Cherokee country. Such was the celerity of his movements that the Cherokees were taken completely by On the 26th of May he reached Fort Ninety-Six, and on June 1 surprise. Four miles before reach- passed the twelve-mile branch of the Keowee. toe Col. Montgomery's attention was attracted by the ing the town of Hsta barking of a dog about a quarter of a mile from the road, at a town called Little Keowee. He detached a force of soldiers to surround the town with instructions to kill the men, but to spare the women and children, which instructions were obeyed, the main force town of about 200 houses, well supplied with provisions and twelve of its warriors killed Other until every one in the lower proceeding on to Estatoe, Q and ammunition. Estatoe was reduced to ashes, towns were attacked in rapid secession,eS OSS i rer en : a ee LEBER peal) TTT ar Rage aii olan, ee rr a per ae oer ae Le a Pda = a eaten 66 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE About twenty of the Cherokees nation had been visited and destroyed. a loss to Col. Montgomery of were killed and forty taken pr isoners, with four soldiers killed and two officers wounded. Montgomery then returned to Fort Prince George, whence he sent out messengers inviting the Cherokees to sue for peace, and also sending word to Capts. Demeré and Stuart, commanding at Fort Loudon, requesting them to obtain peace if possible with the Upper Towns. But hearing noth- ing from them he determined to penetrate to the Middle Towns. Start- ing on the 24th of June he marched with the same celer ity three days, on the third day reaching Etchowee. Entering the \ valley near this town the 2 > e( a savages sprang from their lurking lair, fired upon the troops, killed Capt. Mcuriaon and wounded a number of hismen. A heavy firing sprang up on both sides and lasted about an hour, with the result of killing twenty-six and wounding seventy of Col. Montgomery’s men. The loss to the Indians is not known. but the battle was not decisive, and Col. Montgomery, with such a large sareaielyer of wounded men upon his hands, found it impractica- ble to proceed further, and so returned to Fort Prince George. Fort Loudon, by reason of its great distance from the seat of authority in North Carolina, “Was peculiarly exposed to the dangers of frontier war- fare. Its garrison was now reduced to the fearful alternative of starvi ing to death or of submitting to the enraged Cherokees, as neither Virginia nor North Carolina was able to render any assistance. or an entire month they had been obliged to subsist on the flesh of lean dogs and horses and a spinel supply of Indian - beans, stealthily procured for them by some friendly Cherokee women. Besieged night and day, and with no hope of succor, the garrison refused longer to be animated and encouraged to hold out by their officers, and threatened to leave the fort, take their chances of cutting through the forces of their savage besiegers, and, fail- ing, die at once rather than longer endure the slow, painful process of starvation. ‘The commander therefore held a council of war, and the offi- cers all being of the opinion that it was impossible to hold out longer, agreed to surrender the fort to the Cherokees on the best terms that could be obtained. Capt. Stuart therefore obtained leave to » go to Chota, where he obtained the following terms of capitulation: That the garrison of Fort Loudon march out with their arms and drums, cach soldier having as much powder and ball as their officers shall think necessary for the march, and all the baggage they may choose to carry; that the garrison be permitted to march to Virginia or Fort Prince George as the commanding officer shall think proper, unmolested; that a number of Indians be appointed to escort them and hunt for provisions on the march; that such soldiers as are lame, or are by sickness disabled from marching be received into the Indian towns and kindly used until the y recover, and then: be allowed to return to Fort Prince George; that the Indians provide for the garrison as many horses as they conveniently can for the march, agreeing with the officers and soldiers for pay-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 67 ment; that the fort, great guns, powder, ball and spare arms be d¢ livered to the Indians without fraud or delay on the day appointed for the march of the troops. In accordance with this stipulation the garrison marched out of the fort, with their arms, accompanied by Oconostota, Judd’s friend, the prince of Chota, and several other Indians, and marched fifteen miles on the first day, encamping for the night on a plain about two miles from Tellico. At this place all their Indian attendants left them upon one pretext or another. This desertion was looked upon by the garrison as of a very suspicious nature, and hence a strong guard was placed around the camp. The next morning about daybreak, one of the guard came running into camp with the information that a vast number of Indians armed and painted in the most dreadful manner, were creeping up among the bushes and preparing to surround the camp. Almost immediately the enfeebled and dispirited garrison was surrounded and a heavy fire was opened upon them from all quarters, which they were powerless to resist. Capt. Demeré. three other officers and about twenty-six private soldiers fell at the first onset. Some fled to the woods, others were taken prisoners and confined in the towns of the valley. Capt. Stuart and some others were taken back to Fort Loudon. Attakullakulla, hearing of his friend Stuart's capture, immediately repaired to the fort, purchased him from his captors, took him to his own home, where he kept him until a favorable opportunity should offer for aiding him in his escape. The soldiers were after some time redeemed by the Province at great expense. While the prisoners were confined at Fort Loudon, Oconostota decided to make an attack upon Fort Prince George, and in the attack to employ the cannon and ammunition taken at Fort Loudon. The council at which this decision was made was held at Chota, Capt. Stuart being compelled to attend. The Captain was given to understand that he must accompany the expedition to Fort Prince George, and there assist in the reduction of the fort by manning the artillery for the Indians, and by being their enforced amanuensis in the correspondence with the fort. This prospect was so alarming to the Captain that he, from the moment of being made acquainted with the designs of the Cherokees with reference to himselt, perish in the attempt. He therefore privately communicated his purpose to his friend Attakullakulla, and invoked his assistance to accomplish his release, which Attakullakulla promptly pledged himself to give. Claiming Capt. Stuart as his prisoner, he ed to the other Indians his intention of going hunting for announe a few days, and took the Captain with him. The utmost caution and d in order to prevent surprise from pursuit. Nine resolved to escape or ecelerity were require days and nights did they hasten on through the wilderness for Virginia,~ Sar Se ee y oe Semen Se eee -soeennseeeneeceeneesenenes HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. On the tenth they fell in shaping : with a party of 300 men at the banks of Holston River, sent out by Col. Bird for the relief of Fort Loudon. ‘Yor his kindly offices to Capt. Stuart Attakullakulla was loaded with provisions and presents, and sent back to protect the other unhappy prisoners until such time as they could be ransomed, and to exert his influence with his nation for the restoration of their course by the sun and moon. yeace. , The success of the Cherokees at Fort Loudon and the fact of the bat- tle of Htchowee with Col. Montgomery being indecisive, or perhaps rather being favorable to the Indians, only served to stimulate their spirit of aggression; but the French in Canada being now reduced it became much surer than hitherto to send from the north a force adequate to the defense of the southern provinces. In pursuance of this policy of defense against the warlike Indians, Col. Grant arrived at Charleston with the British regulars early in 1761, and in company with a provincial regiment raised for the purpose, marched for the Cherokee country. Among the field officers of this regiment were Middleton, Laurens, Moultrie, Marion, Hu- ger and Pickens. Col. Grant arrived with his command at Fort Prince George May 27, 1761. Attakullakulla, hearing of the approach of this formidable army, hastened to the camp of Col. Grant, and vainly proposed terms of peace; but knowing too well the story of Cherokee perfidy, the Colonel was determined on severer measures than a treaty, the terms of which were so soon forgotten. " - > = . > Ty 7 structive in the extreme but for the Opportune assistance of Naney Ward.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 1s who has been named the * Pocahontas of the West,” and who, allied tc some of the leading chiets, obtained information of their plan of attack and immediately thereupon communicated this information to Isaac a trader, her friend and a true American. Mr. Thomas without eeded to the committee of satety 1n Virginia, which adopted Thomas, delay proc such measures as were practicable for the defense of the frontier. The plan ot attack by the Jherokees upon the settlements was for one division of the Indians under “ Dragging Canoe” to fall upon the Holston settlement, and another division under ‘Old Abraham ” to fall upon Watauga. These divisions were to consist of 350’ men each. ” division was defeated in a “ miracle of a battle” at “ Dragging Canoe’s o Island, in which the Indians lost upward of Heaton’s Station near Lon forty in killed and the settlers, only five wounded, all of whom recovered. 1e wounded was John Findley, who was supposed by Collins and e been heard of after the attack7on Boone’s camp Among t] by Ramsey not to hav metneg. Old Abraham” with his forces made the attack on the fort at Watauga, where Capt. James Robertson was In command. Capt. John Sevier was also present, and although the attack was made with great e was successful and the Indians were driven off with It was during this siege that occurred the following As the Indians approached the fort they appear to have taken by surprise, and almost surrounded, Miss Catharine Sherrill, anger just in time, started for the fort. She was a et of stature and fleet of foot as the roe. In and as she approached the gate she vigor the defens c considerable loss. romantic incident: who, discovering her d young woman, tall and ere her flight she was closely pursued, found other Indians in her way, doubtless confident of a captive or of a victim to their guns and arrows. But turning suddenly she eluded her pursuers and leaped the palisades at another point, falling into the arms of Capt. John Sevier. In a few years after this sudden leap into the e devoted wife of the eolonel, and the he goyernor, the people's man and the mother of ten children, who could arms of the captain she became th bosom companion of the general, t patriot, John Sevier, and finally the rise up and call her blessed. Another incident not less romantic connected with this attack upon Fort Watauga, tion. No one in the fort was wounded, but Mrs. Bean was captured near Watauga, and taken a prisoner to the station camp of the Indians over the Nollichucky. After being questioned by the Indians as to the num- ber and strength of the forts occupied by the white people, she was con- bound and taken to the top of one oO assign to a certain but of quite 4, different character is worthy of commemora- demned to death, It was a custom with the Cherokees to C burned. e409 mounds to bo sistas ingen ip iaasaaaIET—_ yr Bs Fa , ; ae ‘ ’ H . is ” Jie. Did | RS 3 pale! aided CDN geval is : — fi a ai Hatiti| 2 i ra G4 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. wii ; et woman the office of declaring what punishment should be inflicted upon Hs great offenders, whether for instance, burning or other death, or whether Biel they should be pardoned. The woman so distinguished was called the | “beloved” or “pretty woman.” At the time Mrs. Bean was condemned to death Mrs. Nancy Ward was exercising the functions of the “ pretty woman,” and the question of carrying into execution the sentence against Mrs. Bean being referred to Mrs. Ward, she pronounced her pardon. A division of the Cherokees (other than those commanded by Old Abraham and Dragging Canoe), commanded by Raven, made a detour across the country with the intention of falling upon the frontier in Car- ter’s Valley. Coming up the Holston to the lowest station, the Raven heard of the repulse at Watauga and of the bloody defeat at Long Island Flats, and hence retreated to his own towns. A fourth party of Indians fell upon the inhabitants scattered along the valley of Clinch River, and carried fire, devastation and massacre to the remotest cabin on Clinch, and to the Seven Mile Ford in Virginia. William Creswell, whose numer- ous descendants now live in Blount and Sevier Counties. was among the killed. This, as has been previously said, was about the time of the com- ~~ eer ae = a nahh io pip io borin pelea |e eee esthsnEENNDseemnsees mencement of the Revolutionary war, and the hostilities of and invasion SS by the Cherokees were imputed to the instigation of British officers. The details of the conspiracy were traced to a concerted plan of Gen. Gage | and John Stuart, the superintendent of Indian affairs for the southern a district. The evidence appears conclusive that Mr. Stuart was engaged in arousing the resentment and in stimulating the bad passions of the say- | : P| ages against the Americans who were struggling against ageression, and Ve aa attempting to vindicate the rights of freemen. The plan of Gen. Gage Ve t and Mr. Stuart was to send a large body of men to west Florida, to pene- | trate through the country of the Creeks, Cherokees and Chickasaws. and hi induce the warriors of those nations to join the body, and with this larce | force of British and Indian soldiers, invade the @arolinne and Vine nin a i cee ee : ginia. eT But after the repulse of Peter Parker in the harbor of Charleston. prep- arations were immediately made by the colonists to march with an im- posing force upon the Cherokees, who at that time occupied, as places of eu residence or hunting grounds, the country west and north of the upper i } | settlements in Georgia, west of the Carolinas and southwest of Virginia i Their country was known by three great geographical divisions. asthe lige | | Towns, having 356 warriors: the Middle Settlements, haying 878 warriors: i, | and the Overhill Towns, having 757 warriors—a total of 1.991 Teme Col. MecBury and Maj. Jack, from Georgia, entered the Indian pete: ‘| ments on Tugalo, defeated the Indians, and destroyed their towns on ih OUT PGR itor a ene r. . ' a | “a ae au mae ft AN Hid } semtccaaaicmn ==—l Ct HISTORY OF TENNESSEE, that river. Gen. Williamson, of South Carolina, early in July was at the head of 1,150 men, in command of whom he encountered and defeated a large body of Esseneca Indians at Oconowee, destroyed their towns and a large amount of provisions. Burning Sugaw Town, Soconee, Keowee, Octatoy, Tugalo and Braso Town, he proceeded against Tomassee, Che- hokee and Eusturtee, at which latter place, observing a trail of the enemy, he made pursuit, overtook and vanquished 800 of their warriors, and destroyed the three last named towns. In the meantime North Carolina had raised an army under Gen. Rutherford, who, in concert with Col. Williamson and Col. Martin Armstrong, marched upon the Indians and fought an engagement with them at Cowhee Mountain, in which but one white man was killed. How many of the Indians were killed is not known, as the survivors carried off their dead. From Cowhee Mountain the army under Gen. Rutherford marched to the Middle Towns on the Tennessee River, expecting there to form a junction with Gen. Williamson. After waiting a few days they left here a strong guard and marched on to the Hiwassee towns, but all the towns were found evacuated, the warriors evidently not desiring to meet the troops under Gen. Rutherford. Few Indians were killed and few taken prisoners, but the towns were burned and the buildings, crops and stock of the enemy very generally destroyed, leaving them in a starving eondition. In this Rutherford from thirty to forty Cherokee towns were expedition of Gen. army has since been known as destroyed. The route pursued by this « Rutherford’s Trace.” While these movements were in progress an Col. William Christian, of Virginia, was marching into the army under avages of that nation on the heart of the Cherokee country to avenge the r settlements on the Watauga, Holston and Clinch. By the Ist of August several companies had assembled at the place of rendezvous, the Great Island of Holston. Soon afterward Col. Christian was re-enforced by about 400 North Carolina militia under Col. Joseph Williams, Col. Love This entire army took up ‘ts march for the Chero- Crossing the Holston at Great kee towns, about 200 miles distant. Island they marched eight miles and encamped at Double Springs, on the head waters of Lick Creek. Here the army was joined by a force from Watauga, by which its strength was augmented to 1.800 men, armed with and butcher knives, all infantry except one company es were sent forward to the French Broad, white man should go. At the and Maj. Winston. rifles, tomahawks, of light horse. Sixteen spl across which the Indians had boasted no ar the mouth of Lick Creek: Aloxander Hardin encampment that night, ne h Broad were assembled 3,000 informed Col. Christian that at the Frene indians prepared to dispute his passage. Hardin was ordered into campwas taken without resistance, a panic having seized the Cherokee warriors. GN cc au aaa i : ie fe tai ti i We i fi TO HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. | | with the spies, who, at the head of the Nollichucky, found the camps ay i the enemy deserted, but affording evidence that the Indians were in the ale neighborhood in large numbers. Col. Christian sent aa forward to i A inform the Indians that he would cross not only the French Broad, but ) ' also the Tennessee before he returned. As they came down Dumplin | Creek they were met by a trader named Fallen with a flag of truce, of " whom no notice was taken, in consequence of which he returned 1mme- | \ diately and informed the Indians that the whites, as numerous as the } | trees of the forest, were marching into their country, | i! | Having arrived at the river Col. Christian ordered every mess to : I build a good fire and make such preparations as would lead the Indians f | to think ‘that he intended to remain there several days. During the ' | night a large detachment, under great difficulties, crossed the river neal | where Brabson’s mill afterward stood and passed up the river on its | southern bank. Next morning, when the main army crossed the river near the Big Island, marching forward in order of battle, they momentar- i | ily expected an attack from the Indians, but, to their surprise, found no | trace of even a recent camp. It was afterward learned that after the Al departure of Fallen to meet Col. Christian with his flag of truce, an- | other trader, by the name of Starr, who was in the Indian encampment, | | made a very earnest speech to the Indians, saying to them in effect that Bi the Great Spirit had made the one race of white clay and the other of red; I that he intended the former to conquer the latter; that the pale face HI would certainly overcome the red man and occupy his country; that it was | . | useless, therefore, to resist the onward movements of the white man, and f | advised an immediate abandonment of their purpose of defense, as that | could only result in defeat. A retreat was made at once to their villages . | and to the fastnesses of the mountains. The next morning the army | under Col. Christian resumed its march along the valley of Boyd’s | Creek, and down Ellejoy to Little River, thence to the Tennessee, and on / | the march not an Indian was to be seen. but it was expected that on the ‘ | | opposite side of the Tennessee a formidable resistance would be made ) i | Here also they were disappointed, for crossing the Little Tennessee they . |i took possession of a town called Tamotlee, above the mouth of Tellico aay River, and encamped in the deserted village. Next morning Great Island | not one of whom could be found. But they were not for this reason to go c unpunished. ‘Their deserted towns and villages were burned and laid ea waste, as Neowee, Tellico and Chilhowee and others. Occasionally a sol- itary warrlor was seen making his way from one town to another, but Pe i, | | no one was taken prisoner. Such towns. however. as were known not to Be | mie | Sie fi { om it tt a LI | | “ oN SoFROM PHOTO BY THUSS, KOELLEIN & GIERS NASHVILLE James ROBERTSON aren EL hE EAa ' be a i - ie ane ; lat d i} I i Wily tet ie t i He il Oe | tI) it i ili P|! El || Be 1) i | || | ae {i | i i | Ht i} i re | | if | | a 4 | bi | { I sf | | i fH | ah i | fH f | | a | Re. | i Ae | } | i} Bt | tall | HH fai i | Hh | iN HE | it | j | | | fel | | | 4 ti | | \ i BEET,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. have consented to Hostilities, as Chota, were not destroyed. This course was pursued by Col. Christian to convince the level! the Cherokees. that he was at war only with enemies. Sending outa few men with flags of truce requesting a talk with the chiefs, six or seven of them imme- diately came in, and ina few days several others came forward and pro- posed a cessation of hostilities. This was granted to take effect when a treaty should be made with the whole tribe, which was to assemble the succeeding May on Long Island. A suspension of hostilities followed, applicable to all the Cherokee towns but two, which were high up in the mountains on Tennessee River. ‘These were reduced to ashes because they had burned a prisoner named Moore, taken some time previously near Watauga. Col. Christian’s troops, having conquered a peace, nee turned to the settlement. : But a part of the Cherokee nation was still hostile, panted for revenge and resolved not to participate in the comtemplated treaty. However two separate treaties were made, one at Dewitt’s Corner, between the In- dians and commissioners from South Carolina; the other at Long Island, between several chiefs of the Overhill Towns, and Col. Christian and Col. Evan Shelby, commissioners from Virginia, and Waightstill Avery, Jo- seph Winston and Robert Lanier from North Carolina. By the former large cessions of territory were made on the Saluda and Savannah Rivers, and by the latter Brown’s line was agreed upon as the boundary between the Indians and the settlements, and the Cherokees released lands as low down the Holston River as the mouth of Cloud’s Creek, but the Chicka- maugas refused to join in the treaty. At this treaty, made at Fort Hen- ry, on the Holston River, near Long Island, July 20, 1777, between North Carolina and the Overhill Indians, the following among other ar- ticles were agreed upon: ARTICLE I. That hostilities shall forever cease between the said Cherokees and the peo ple of North Carolina from this time forward, and that peace, friendship and mutual! confidence shall ensue. By the second article all prisoners and property were to be delivered up to the agent to be appointed to reside among the Cherokees, and by the third article no white man was permitted to reside in or pass through the Overhill towns without a certificate signed by three justices of the peace of North Carolina, or Washington County, Va.. the certificate to be approved by the agent. Any person violating this article was to be apprehended by the Cherokees and delivered to the said agent, whom they were to assist in conducting such person to the nearest justice ot the peace for adequate punishment, and the Cherokees were authorized to apply to their own use the effects of such person so trespassing. Ar- Sny 4 : ; ; ) ; . tn . 7 ot : 7 ‘a re - , Vipy) \ } 4 |S Ft ee 2 eee ee ee eee — - 7 ee " ———7 ny a ee | 18 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. I ent of murderers, both Indians and tale ticle fourth provided for the punishm ! 7 i white men. and article fifth defined the boundary line as follows: | “That the boundary line between the State of North Carolina and the forever hereafter be and remain as follows: ing line which during this treaty hath been 1] Cherokees and the State of Vir- | said Overhill Cherokees shall Beginning at a point in the divid agreed upon between the said Overhi : the line between that State and North Carolina, hereafter to thence a right aE ginia, where he extended. shall cross or intersect the same; running ae | line to the north bank of Holston River at the mouth of Cloud’s Creek, be- ing the second creek below the Warrior’s Ford at the mouth of Carter’s he highest point of a mountain called the a naan Os re nee ie Valley; thence a right line to t 7 High Rock or Chimney Top: thence a right line to the mouth oe Camp Creek. otherwise called) McNamee’s Creek on the south bank of Nolli- chucky River, about ten miles or thereabouts, below the mouth of Great be the same more or less, and from the mouth of Camp Creek Limestone, oe crounds of the Middle Settlements from those of the Overhill Cherokees. nee the said Overhill Cherokees, in behalf of themselves, their heirs and successors, do hereby freely in open treaty, acknowledge and confess that all the lands to the east, northeast and southeast of the said line, and ly- ing south of the said line of Virginia, at any time heretofore claimed by et ea pay” cmmenl Tan the said Overhill Cherokees, do of right now belong to the State of North Carolina, and the said subscribing chiefs, in behalf of the said Overhill Cherokees, their heirs and successors, do hereby in open treaty, now and forever, relinquish and give up to the said State, and forever quit claim || | | all right, title, claim and demand of, in and to the land comprehended in | the State of North Carolina, by the line aforesaid.” This treaty was signed by Waightstill Avery, William Sharpe, Rob- ert Lanier and Joseph Winston, on the part of North Carolina, and by | the following chiefs and warriors, each one making his mark: Oconostota, | The Old Tassel, The Raven, Willanawaw, Ootosseteh, Attusah, Abram of Chilhowee, Rollowch, Toostooh, Amoyah, Oostossetih, Tillehaweh, (Jueeleekah, Annakelinjah, Annacekah, Skeahtukah, Attakullakulla, Ookoonekah, Kataquilla, Tuskasah and Sunnewauh. Witnesses, Jacob Hh Womack, James Robins, John Reed, Isaac Bledsoe. Brice Martin and ni John Kearns. Interpreter, Joseph Vann. EF | The negotiations and details of this treaty of Holston, which com- menced on the 30th of June and was concluded on the 20th of July, are M1] of unusual interest, but too numerous and requiring too much space to be introduced into this work. And while much was hoped from the friendly v and yielding disposition of the large number of chiefs and warriors in ra)HISTORY OF TENNESSEER. ry ¢ 4 () oe attendance, yet as some distinguished chiefs were absent. peace and tran- iquility could not be considered as absolutely assured before the views and intentions of these absent chiefs were known. Judge Friend, the Dragging Canoe, the Lying Fish and Young Tassel were among the Dragging Canoe was chief of the Chickamaugas, who remained dissatisfied in part, at least, as the result of British intrigue. In order to counteract so far as practicable the influence of the British agents, Gov. Caswell directed that a superintendent of Indian affairs ‘absent ones. reside among them, and the North Carolina commissioners appointed Capt. James Robertson to that important position. apt. Robertson car- ried, as a present from Goy. Caswell,a dog to the Raven of Chota, pro- posing and hoping for peace. Swanucah and some of the more aged ehiefs were disposed to peace, but they were unable to suppress the warlike spirit of the Dragging Canoe and his hostile tribe. Some years previous to the time at which we have now arrived cer- tain families from West Virginia, desiring to reach west Florida, built boats on the Holston, and following that stream and the Tennessee reached the lower Mississippi by water. They were obliged to employ Indians and Indian traders as guides, Occasionally a boat was wrecked between the Chickamauga towns and the lower end of the Muscle Shoals, and then its crew became an easy prey to the Indians whose settlements were extending along the rapids from ‘year to year. The Chickamaugas were the first to settle in this locality, and usually failed to attend treaties of peace held by other portions of the Cherokee nations, and hence did not consider themselves bound by treaty stipulations entered into by the other portions of the nation. Leaving their towns near Chickamauga they moved lower down and laid the foundations of the five lower towns— Running Water, Nickajack, Long Island Village, Crow Town and Look These towns soon became populous and the most formidable part Here congregated the worst men from all the of the Cherokee nation. Indian tribes, and also numerous depraved white men, all of whom for a number of years constituted the ‘‘ Barbary Powers of the West.” They were a band of reckless. lawless banditti of more- than 1,000 warriors. Having refused the terms of peace proffered by Col. Christian, having committed numerous atrocities upon the frontier, and being the central point from which marauding expeditions radiated for murderous and all criminal purposes, it was determined to invade their country and destroy A strong force was therefore ordered into the field by Vir- ginia and North Carolina under the command of Col. Evan Shelby, whose name is familiar to all Tennesseans in connection with the defense Col. Shelbvy’s foree consisted of their towns. of the pioneers against the savages. Sa ee ee ote“5 * ao r Z FA tre ‘ SONATE SRE a Ce LT in gag Rs, IS a ees Sn he aa ae ads OF San SSS ee ape ae rie 3S See eee aa So ere oe ee sala ng mesg A SS RR ene = rn by ~ — " Bn j ‘ SSO RNS imp 1am oe men under Col. John Montgomery, t 8() HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 1.000 volunteers from these two States, and a regiment of twelve months’ his regiment having been raised as Clarke in his expedition to Kas- arily diverted from that purpose This expedition was fitted a re-enforcement to Gen. George Rogers kaskia, Vincennes, etc., but was tempor to assist in the reduction of the Chickamaugas. out on the individual responsibility of Isaac , few miles above the present location Shelby. The army rendez- voused atthe mouth of Big Creek, ¢ of Rogersville. From this rendezvous, having made canoes and pirogues, the troops descended the Holston as r Chickamauga towns took them completely by surprise. ing the approach of Col. Shelby’s command the Indians fied in all direc- tions to the woods and mountains without giving battle, pursued by Shelby, and losing in killed atthe hands of his command upward of forty of their warriors, most of their towns being destroyed, and about 20,000 bushels of corn being captured. They also lost about $20,000 -worth of This success of Col. Shelby was very fortunate, as it amilton. of Canada, from forming a grand coalition of 1 southern Indians, to be aided by British regulars in apidly as possible, and reaching the Upon discover- stores and goods. prevented Gov. H all the northern an¢ a combined attack upon ti After the battle of King’s Mountain, in which Tennessee officers and an honorable and conspicuous part, Col. John 1e settlers on the western waters. soldiers bore such apprehensive of an outbreak from the Cherokees, in the many men and arms, and sent home Capt. Russell to Information was brought in by two traders, Sevier became absence of so guard the frontier settlers. Thomas and Harlin, that a large body of Indians was on the march to as- sail the frontier, but before the attack was made Col. Sevier himself, arrived at home in time to assist in repelling the with his vigorous troops, any time Sevier set on foot attacks of the Indians. Without losing an offensive expedition against the Cherokees. putting himself at the head of about 100 men and setting out in advance of the other troops. t= | Coming upon a body of Indians he pursued them across French Broad to Boyd’s Creek, near which he drew on an attack by the Indians. Se- vier’s command was divided into three divyisions—the center under Ool. Sevier, the right wing under Maj. Jesse Walton, and the left wing under Maj. Jonathan Tipton. The victory won here by Sevier was de- cisive. The Indians lost twenty-eight in killed and many wounded, who escaped being taken prisoners. Of the white troops none were killed and only three seriously wounded. ‘This rapid expedition saved the fron- tier from a bloody invasion, as the Indian foree which he thus broke up was large and well armed. A few days after this repulse of the enemy Col. Sevier’s littleHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. i Q1 army was re-enforced by the arrival of Col. Arthur Campbell with his regiment from Virginia and by Maj. Martin with his troops from Sulli- van County. He then had at his command a body of about 700 mounted men. With this force he crossed Little Tennessee three miles below Chota, while the main body of the Indians were lying in wait for him at the ford one mile below Chota. The Indians were so disconcerted by his crossing at the lower ford instead of at the upper, and so overawed by the imposing array of so large a body of cavalry, that they made no attack, but instead, upon his approach, hastily retreated and escaped. The troops pushed on to Chota and proceeded to reduce Chilhowee, eight miles above. Every town between the Little Tennessee and the Hiwassee was reduced to ashes. The only white man killed in this expedition was Capt. Elliott, of Sullivan County. Near to Hiwassee, after it was burned, an Indian warrior was captured, and by him a message was sent to the Cherokees proposing terms of peace. At Tellico the army was met by Watts and Noonday who were ready to make terms. After passing Hiwassee Town the army continued its march southwardly until it came near the Chickamauga, or Look Out Towns, where they encamped, and next day marching into them found them deserted. They proceeded down the Coosa to the long leafed or yellow pine and cypress swamp, where they began an indiscriminate destruction of towns, houses, grain and stock, the Indians fleeing precipitately before them. Returning to Chota they held a council with the Cherokees which lasted two days. A peace was here agreed upon, after which the army, crossing near the mouth of Nine Mile Creek, returned home. The Cherokees, notwithstanding their repeated failures and chastise- ments, were still unable to repress their deep passion for war and glory and strong love of country, which continued to further aggression and hostility. They still prowled around the remote settlements committing theft and murder. Col. Sevier, therefore, in March, 1781, collected to- gether 130 men and marched with them against the Middle Settlements of the Cherokees, taking by surprise the town of Tuckasejah, on the head waters of Little Tennessee. Fifty warriors were slain, and fifty women and children taken prisoners. About twenty towns and all the grain and corn that could be found were burned. The Indians of the Middle Towns were surprised and panic stricken, and consequently made but a feeble resist- ance. During the summer a party of Cherokees invaded the settlements then forming on Indian Creek; and Cen. Sevier, with a force of 100 men, marched from Washington County, crossed Nollichucky, proceeded to near the site of the present town of Newport, on French Broad, crossed that river, and also the Big Pigeon, and unexpectedly fell upon the-trail Sa pre e e T a r™ rs - i 2 * i ~ i - = *pe —— ee - ALT AN ET PSAs TEN iene \ | I ih \ i | if aaeneEeneeennemannmmeetemtans 7 eet siete ae ee ee ee A A i er Beene ea “ae a SS a es & 2, HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. sudden fire killed seven- of the Indians, surrounded their camp, and by a : k. now in Jeffer- : x 7 ® “ ~ “4 § oy "BA teen of them, the rest escaping. This was on Indian Cre son County. In the spring of 1782 i i lained. and Goy. Martir Broad. Of this intrusion the Cherokees complained, and Goy. 3 1 settlements were formed south. of the French wrote to Col. Sevier in reference thereto, asking him to prevent the en- eroachments complained of. and to warn the intruders off the lands re- served to the Indians, and if they did not move off according to warning he was to go forth with a body of militia and pull down every cabin and drive them off, “laying aside every consideration of their entreaties to the contrary.” , ee Notwithstanding the efforts of a part of the Cherokee nation in the in- terest of peace, it continued impossible to restrain the majority of the warriors. They could plainly see that the white man was steadily en- croaching upon their hunting grounds and reservations, and that there was no remedy, at least there was no remedy but war. Treaty lines were but a feeble barrier against the expansive force of the settlements. Unless this feeble barrier could be made as strong as the famous Chinese wall, and as the Raven expressed it at the treaty of Holston, be as ‘‘a wall to the skies,” it would not be out of the power of the people to pass it; and so long as it was not out of their power to pass it it served only as a tem- porary check upon their advance, and as a means of tantalizing the red proprietors of the soil into a false sense of security of possession, of rais- ing his hopes of retaining the beautiful and beloved home of his ances- tors, only to dash them cruelly to the ground in a few short weeks or months at most. Even the Indians most peacefully disposed complained that there was no line drawn according to promise in former treaties which should serve as a boundary between the two races. However, in May, 1783, the western boundary of North Carolina was fixed by the Legislature of that State as follows: ‘Beginning on the line which divides this State from Virginia, at a point due north of the mouth of Cloud’s Creek; running thence west to the Mississippi; thence down the Mississippi to the thirty-fifth degree of north latitude; thence due east until it strikes the Appalachian Moun- tains; thence with the Appalachian Mountains to the ridge that divides the waters of the French Broad River and the waters of the Nollichucky River; and with that ridge until it strikes the line described in the act of 1778, commonly called Brown’s Line; and with that line and those sev- eral water-courses to the beginning.” There was reserved, however, a tract for the Cherokee hunting grounds as follows: ;HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. x3 “Beginning at the Tennessee River where the southern boundary of North Carolina intersects the same, nearest the Chickamauga Towns; thence up the middle of the Tennessee and Holston Rivers to the middie of French Broad River, which lines are not to include any islands in said river, to the mouth of Big Pigeon River; thence up the same to the head thereof; thence along the dividing ridge between the waters of Pigeon River and Tuskejah River to the southern boundary of this State.” : About this time occurred the unfortunate killing of Untoola, or Gun Rod of Citico, a Cherokee chief, known to the whites as Butler. It was when attempts were being made to revive peaceful relations between the white and Indian populations. The aged and wise among the Cherokees could clearly see the futility of continuing hostilities with the whites, and their councils had at length prevailed over the inconsiderateness and rashness of the young men and warriors. But Butler was one of the chiefs who was opposed to peace, and when he heard of the presence of Yol. James Hubbard and a fellow soldier, who were in the Cherokee country for the purpose of trafficking for corn and other necessities, he, in company with a brave who still adhered to his fortunes, went forth to meet Col. Hubbard, against whom, according to Indian ideas of honor, he had special reasons for enmity, and attempted to put him out of the way. After meeting Hubbard, and maneuvering for some time to gain the advantage of position, Butler suddenly, and as quick as lightning, raised his gun and fired upon Col. Hubbard, the ball passing between his head and ear, grazing the skin and slightly stunning him; Butler and his attendant brave suddenly turned their horses’ heads and galloped rap- idly away. Recovering himself Col. Hubbard seized his rifle, which he had leaned against a tree for the purpose of convincing Butler of his peaceful intentions, fired upon him when at a distance of about eighty yards, hitting him in the back and bringing him to the ground. Ap- proaching the wounded Indian hard words passed between the two, and at length Col. Hubbard, unable to longer bear the taunts and insults of Butler, clubbed his gun and killed him ata single blow. The companion of Butler, inadvertently permitted to escape, carried the news of Butler's death and the manner of it to the Cherokee nation, and they in retalia- tion committed many acts of revenge and cruelty, notwithstanding Gov. Martin made every reasonable effort to preserve the peace. The Gover- nor was informed that Col. Hubbard had killed Untoola, or Butler, with- talk” to the Cherokees. out any provocation, and sent a conciliatory hat he had given He also sent a letter to Gen. Sevier informing him t directions for the apprehension of Hubbard and his retention in jail until such time as a trial should be obtainable.Te <——s Se Ee Sf eee | 84 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. i Besides the killing of Butler the Cherokees had other causes for dis- The limits set by the Franklin treaties had not been, be- He satisfaction. 7 | The consequences of cause they could not be, observed by the settlers. these continual encroachments was that it was thought necessary by Con | gress that a treaty should be held under the authority of the United Hi States. In order to hold and establish such a treaty Benjamin Hawkins, || Andrew Pickens, Joseph Martin and Lachlin McIntosh were appointed By these commissioners the chiets of the ‘ at Hopewell on the Keowee = RT | | x ( jvernment comm issloners. ii respective towns were invited to a conference This treaty of Hopewell was coneluded November in: South Carolina. : 28 1785. By it the boundary which had been the chief cause of com- 1e Indians was made to conform very nearly to the lines of the | plaint by tl Be | leed to Henderson & Co. and the treaty of Holston in 1/77. The fourth ‘ { } Wie i | article of this treaty fixing the boundary was as follows: 1 ee ed | ArticLe 4. The boundary allotted to the Cherokees for their hunting grounds be- «ween the. said Indians and the citizens of the United States within the limitsof the Unit- | ed States of America is, and shall be the following, viz.: Beginning at the mouth of Duck | 2iver on the Tennessee; thence running northeast tothe ridge dividing the waters running 1 | ‘nto Cumberland from those running into the Tennessee; thence eastwardly along the said | | ridge to a northeast line to be run which shall strike the river Cumberland forty miles | sbove Nashville; thence along the said line to the river; thence up the said river to the ford where the Kentucky road crosses the river; thence to Campbell’s line near the | Cumberland Gap; thence to the mouth of Cloud’s Creek on Holston (River); thence to the Chimney-top Mountain; thence to Camp Creek near the mouth of Big Limestone on Nol lichucky; thence a southerly course six miles to a mountain; thence south to the North @arolina line: thence to the South Carolina Indian boundary and along the same south- west over the top of the Oconee Mountain till it shall strike Tugalo River; thence a direct line to the top of the Currahee Mountain; thence to the head of the south fork of Oconee RI fi | River. It was also provided in the articles of treaty that if any citizen of the United States should settle within the above described Indian domain, ae and would not remove within six months after the conclusion of the treaty, he should forfeit all rights of protection from the Government; and it was further provided that all Indians committing murders or other erlmes should be surrendered to the authorities of the Government for trial, and all white persons committing crimes against the Indians should be punished as if such crimes had been committed against white citizens: that the United States had the sole right of regulating trade with the In- dians; that the Indians should have the right to send a deputy to Con- gress; that the punishment of the innocent under the idea of relaliation was unjust and should not be practiced by either party, and that the hatchet should be forever buried and friendship be universal. The wit- nesses who signed the articles were William Blount, Maj. Samuel Tay- lor, John Owen, Jesse Walton. Capt. John Cowan, Thomas Gregg, W. ny TRL Arrh.s< TLeTeTeET cea =~ Ti PRT aT ae enti LEED ee aaa ee aes aie 5 we es acca iy neHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Hazzard, James Madison (intrepreter), and Arthur Coody (interpre- ter). The Indians were represented by the following chiefs, ne made their marks to the articles: Koatohee, or Corn Tassel, of Toquo; Scho- lanetta, or Hanging Man of Chota; Tuskegatahue, or Long Fellow, of Chistohee; Ooskwha, or Abraham, of Chilhowee; Kolacusta, or Prince. of North; Newota, or the Gritz, of Chickamauga; Konatota, or the Rising Fawn, of Hiwassee; Tuckasee, or Young Terrapin, of Ellejoy; Maostak ka, or the Waker, of Oostanawa; Untoola, or Gun Rod, of Citico; Unsuo- kanil. or Buffalo White Calf, “New Cussee;” Kostayeck, or Sharp Fel- low, Watauga; Chonosta, or Cowe; Cheskoonhoo, or Bird in Close, of Tomotlee; Tuckassee, or Terrapin, of Hightower; Chesetoah, or the Rabbit, of Flacoa; Chesecotetona, or Yellow Bird, of the Pine Log ; Sketaloska, or Second Man, of Tellico; Chokasatabe, or Chickasaw Kil- ler. Tosonta; Onanoota, of Koosoati; Ookoseeta, or Sour Mush, of Kool- oque; Umatooetha, of Lookout Mountain; Tulco, or Tom, of Chatauga; Will. of Akoha; Necatee, of Sawta ; Amokontakona, or Kutcloa; Kowetata- bee, of Frog Town; Keukuch, of Talkoa; Tulatiska, of Choway; Wooa- looka, the Waylayer, of Chota; Tatlausta, or Porpoise, of Talassee ; John, of Little Tellico; Skeleelack; Akonalucta, the Cabin: Cheanoka, of Kawe- takac, and Yellow Bird. This treaty was sl Cherokees, as well it might be considering what they gained. A lance at the map of the State will show that the United States com- ened with great unanimity by the chiefs of the Oli missioners set aside the treaty made by North Carolina in that State (if that can be called a treaty in which the Indians had’ no voice) so far as to recede to the Cherokees nearly all of the territory in this State between the Cumberland and Tennessee Rivers except that north of the mouth of Duck River. ‘The surrender of this territory was made to con- ciliate the Cherokees, but it failed of permanent influence for peace, and gave great dissatisfaction to the border settlers, whose boundaries were thereby very much contracted. William Blount, then in Congress trom North Carolina, gave it all the opposition in his power, arguing that Con- eress had no authority to make a treaty which was repugnant to the laws of North Carolina concerning lands within her limits. This view, however, seems not to have obtained in Congress, for with- in three months from the time of the conclusion of this treaty with the Cherokees, a treaty was concluded January 10, 1786, between the same commissioners, with the exception of Mr. McIntosh, and the Chickasaw nation, by which their boundaries were for the first time definitely fixed. The following were the boundaries established between the Chickasaws ond the United States: eeerr. - ’ a Ekin < ; Pa Eee. ease pr pow oo ae] DT ei Ya eee eaipiegse oe AAAI ca i 4 4 j \ L | a ‘i ae yy ¥ P ee — on R6 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Beginning on the ridge that divides the waters running into the Cumberland front those running into the Tennessee, at a point on a line to be run northeast, which shall strike the Tennessee at the mouth of Duck River; thence running westerly along the said ridge till it shall strike the Ohio; thence down the southern banks thereof to the Missis- sippi; thence down the same to the Choctaw line of Natchez district; thence along the said line to the line of the district eastwardly as far as the Chickasaws claimed and lived and hunted on November 29, 1782; thence the said boundary eastwardly shall be the lands al lotted to the Choctaws and Cherokees to live and hunt on and the lands at present in the aving and reserving for the establishment of a trading post a tract er post of the Muscle Shoals at the mouth of Oco- ll be five miles on the said river, which post ler the Government of the Unit- possession of the Creeks, s or parcel of land to be laid out at the low chappo, in a circle, the diameter of which sha and the lands annexed thereto, shall be to the-use and unt ed States of America. The usual provisions concerning prisoners, eriminals, stolen horses, Indian trade, ete., were established. This treaty was signed by Benja- min Hawkins, Andrew Pickens and Joseph Martin, commissioners on the part of the United States, and by Piomingo, head warrior and first minister of the Chickasaw nation; Mingatushka, one of the leading chiefs, and Latopoya, first beloved man of the nation. Not long after the conclusion of the treaty of Hopewell with the Cherokees, an attack was made by some Indians belonging to this nation on some settlers on the Holston. Mr. Biram’s house was attacked and two men killed. A few of the settlers hastily erected temporary defenses, while the others fell back upon the settlements above. To again check these atrocities, Gen. Sevier adopted the policy so frequently pursued by him with salutary effect, viz.: that of suddenly penetrating with a strong force in- to the heart of the Cherokee country. This invasion of Gen. Sevier resulted in the killing of fifteen warriors and of the burning of the val- ley towns, and although the pursuit from motives of military expediency was: abandoned, yet it had the effect of preventing aggressions for some considerable time. Yet further measures of conciliation were not con- sidered unwise by either North Carolina or the State of Franklin which had been in operation about two years. The former State sent Col. Joseph Martin into the Cherokee nation ona tour of observation. Col. Martin on his return wrote Goy. Caswell, May 11, 1786, to the effect that affairs were not yet by any means ina settled condition, that two or three parties of Cherokees had been out on an expedition to secure satis- faction for the murder, by a Mr. McClure and some others, of four of their young men; that these parties had returned with fifteen scalps and were satisfied to remain at peace if the whites were, but if they wanted war they could have all of th: r mi rant: + | y 1 have all of that they might want; that there were great prepar- ations making among the Creeks, instigated as he believed by the Frene 18 iards for ; c iti his Gi ch and Spaniards for an expedition against the settlers on the Cum- berland. iHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Gov. Sevier, in order if possible to maintain peace between his State and the Indians, appointed commissioners to negotiate another treaty with the Cherokees, the commissioners being William Cocke, Nezeander Outtaw, Samuel Wear, Henry Conway and Thomas Ingle. Negotiations were begun at Chota Ford July 31, 1786, and concluded at Coyatee August 3. The chiefs who conducted the negotiations were Old occa and Hanging Maw. The proposition made to the Indians was that if the Cherokees would give up the murderers among them, return the stolen horses, and permit the whites to settle on the north side of the Tennessee and Holston, as they intended to do at any rate, the whites would live at peace with them and be friends and brothers. The land claimed in this treaty was the island in the Tennessee at the mouth of the Holston, and from the head of the island to the dividing ridge between Holston, Little River and Tennessee to the Blue Ridge and the lands sold to them by North Carolina on the north side of the Tennessee. These terms Ore agreed to and the treaty signed by the two chiefs named above. During the existence of the State of Franklin the Cherokees were comparatively quiet, haying a wholesome dread of the courage and ability of Gov. Sevier: but with the fall of the Franklin government they pegan again to manifest a desire to renew hostilities, and an Indian invasion was regarded as imminent. Messengers were therefore sent to Gen. Sevier. who was in the eastern part of the Territory, who, after his fail- ure at the siege at Tipton’s house, was immediately himself again, and at the head of a body of mounted men upon the frontier ready, as of old to guard and protect its most defenseless points. On July 8, 1788, Gen. Sevier and James Hubbert, one of his old Franklin officers, issued an address to the inhabitants in general recommending that every station be on its guard, and also that every good man that could be spared report to Maj. Hous- ton’s station to repel the enemy if possible. Just before Gen. Sevier started out on this expedition a most atro- cious massacre occurred of the family of a Mr. Kirk, who lived about twelve miles from Knoxville, on the southwest side of Little River. During the absence of Mr. Kirk from home, an Indian named Slim Tom, who was well known to the family, approached the house and asked fo something to eat. After being supplied he withdrew, but soon returned with a party of Indians, who fell upon and massacred the entire family, leaving them dead in the yard. Not long afterward Mr. Kirk returned, and, seeing the horrible condition of his dead family, immediately gave the alarm to the neighborhood. The militia, under command of Sevier, assembled to the number of several hundred, and severely punished the indians in several portions of the Territory, though they generally fledfp neueeetliihnttiemetetiices ont tieandiioaeeeam : a — ~ — : eee OO Dd HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. before the troops to the mountains. A friendly Indian by the name of Abraham lived with his son on the south side of the Tennessee. W hen the troops came to the south side of the river opposite Abraham’s house, they sent for him and his son to cross over to them, and afterward Abra- nam was sent to bring in the Tassel and another Indian, that a talk might be held with them, a flag of truce being also displayed to assure the Indians of their peaceful intentions. The Indians, when they had crossed the river under these conditions and assurances, were put into a Gen. Sevier being absent on business connected with his com- house. mand, youne Kirk, a son of the man whose family had just before been miaencrod was permitted to enter the house with tomahawk in hand, ae- companied by Hubbard. ‘There Kirk struck his tomahawk into the head of one of the Indians, who fell dead at his feet, the troops looking in through the window upon the deed. ‘The other Indians, five or six in number, immediately understood the fate in store for them, and bowing their heads and casting their eyes to the ground, each in turn received the tomahawk as had the first, and all fell dead at the feet of young Kirk, the avenger. Thus was committed an act as base and treacherous as any ever committed by the red man. Gen. Sevier returning, learned of the commission of this crime, saw at a glance what must be the inevita- ble effects of the rash act, and remonstrated with young Kirk for the cruel part he had played, but was answered by him that if he (Sevier) had suffered at the hands of the murderous Indians as he had done, he would have acted in the sameway. Kirk was sustained by a number of the troops, and Sevier was obliged to overlook the flagitious deed. The massacre of Kirk’s family was followed by that of many others. A man named English was killed near Bean’s Station, and also James Kirkpatrick. Some were killed near Bull Run, others north of Knox- ville, and many others on the roads to Kentucky and West Tennessee. Capt. John Fayne, with some enlisted men, and Capt. Stewart, who had been sent to Houston’s Station, were sent out to reconnoiter the adjacent country. They crossed the Tennessee and entered an apple orchard to gather some fruit. Some Indians lying in wait suffered them to march into the orchard without molestation, and then while they were gathering « ‘ o the fruit fell upon them and drove them into the river. killing sixteen i Wi i re bf ene j b Ea y i ¥ wounding four and taking one prisoner. This massacre occurred near a town named Citico. The killed were afterward found bv Capt. Evans, horribly mutilated, and by him buried. The war was continued for sey- eral weeks with success to the south of the Tennessee. and finally the troops returned home. The events above narrated mainly occurred in the eastern part of thi CHLSHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. QQ State. An attempt will now be made to relate as succinetly as may be and yet witha sufficiency of detail, similar events that had been for soa years simultaneously occurring upon the Cumberland. The proximity of the Ghickasaws to the settlements on the Cumberland had been Gane for serious apprehension; yet, notwithstanding this, the first attack upon them was made by the Creeks and Cherokees. ‘This was in the year 1780, and was made, not by a large force of Indians in battle array, but by small parties upon individuals or small parties of white en In April of that year the Indians killed an elder and younger Milliken, Jo- seph Bernard, Jonathan Jennings, Ned Carver and William Neely, all in the vicinity of Nashville: at Eaton’s Station, James Mayfield; at Mansker’s Lick, Jesse Ballentine, John Shockley, David Goin and Risby Kennedy; at Bledsoe’s Lick, William Johnson; at Freeland’s Station, D. Larimer, and near Nashville, Isaac Lefevre, Solomon Phillips, Samuel Murray and Bartlett Renfroe. About this time occurred the massacre at Battle Creek, in Robertson County, recited in detail in the history of that county. The Indians engaged in this massacre were Chickasaws, and the reason given by them for its commission was that Gen. George Rogers Clarke had that year built Fort Jefferson, eighteen miles below the mouth of the Ohio, on the east side of the Mississippi. All the ter- ritory west of the Tennessee River they claimed, and they were especially offended at Gen. Clarke’s intrusion, upon which they became the allies of the English. Tsolated eases of murder were numerous for years in thes¢ settlements, the names of the killed being generally reserved for insertion in the histories of the counties in which the murders occurred, in order to avoid unnecessary repetition. In April, 1781. a determined attack was made by a numerous body of Cherokees on the fort at the Bluff, and nineteen horsemen, who sallied forth to drive them off, were defeated with a loss of seven killed, four wounded and some of their horses stolen At this battle occurred the famous onset of the dogs upon the Indians, an anomaly in warfare, and which enabled nearly all of those not killed to regain the fort in safety. Mrs. Robertson, who directed the guard to let slip the dogs, pertinently remarked that the Indians’ fear of dogs and love of horses proved the salvation of the whites on this occasion. In 1782 John Tucker, Joseph Hendricks and David Hood were fired upon at the French Lick. The first two, though wounded, escaped through the assistance of their friends. David Hood was shot down, scalped, and left by the Indians for dead. in their chase after stam. ped upon. slowly Tucker and Hendricks. Hood, supposing the Indians had gone, picked himself up and began to walk toward the fort, but to his disap- pointment and dismay he saw the same Indians just before him making,Ta ee nner er, een arena eae easiest pe oe = ae : rat iT i LU ia a ———- ei RE IE Se wg 90) HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. sport of his misfortunes and mistake. They then made a second attack upon him, inflicting other apparently mortal wounds, and again left him He fell in a brush heap in the snow, where he lay all night. for dead. and The next morning being found by his blood he was taken home placed in an outhouse for, dead, but to the surprise of all he revived and lived for many years. The continuance, frequency and savageness of these depredations led many of the people on the Cumberland to seriously consider the propri- ety of breaking up the settlements and going away to Kentucky, or to some place where it was hoped they might live in peace. Gen. Robert- son earnestly opposed the plan, as it was impossible to get to Kentucky, and equally so to reach the settlements on the Holston. ‘The only plan which contained an element of practicability was to go down the river to Illinois, and even to the execution of this plan there seemed insuperable obstacles, the principal one being to build the boats. ‘This could not be done without timber; the timber was standing in the woods, and the woods were full of Indians. In 1783, after further ravages by the Chickasaws, Gen. Robertson ob- tained a cession from them by which they relinquished to North Carolina a region of country extending nearly forty miles south of the Cumber- land to the ridge dividing the tributaries of that stream from those of the Duck and Elk Rivers. sions and murders to cease. held at Walnut Hills, they returned to the settlements evidently with the renewed determination to kill as many of the settlers as possible. In This cession, however, did not cause inva- Instigated by the Spaniards at a conference order to neutralize the influence of the Spaniards Gen. Robertson opened a correspondence with one of the Spanish agents, a Mr. Portell, in which a mutual desire to live at peace was expressed; but the letters which passed between Gen. Robertson and Mr. Portell had apparently but little if any effect upon the minds of the Indians, whose depredations were continued through the year 1785. In 1786 was made the treaty of Hopewell with the Chickasaws, as mentioned and inserted above. by which immigration to the Cumberland was greatly encouraged and increased. | In 1787 Indian atrocities continued as numerous as before, and it ene necessary tor Gen. Robertson to imitate the tactics of Gen. Sevier, viz.: To carry offensive operations into the heart of the enemy’s country. For this purpose a force of 130 men volunteered. of whom Gen Robertson took command, assisted by Col. Robert Hays and Col. James Ford. At the head of this force he marched against the Indian villace of Coldwater, with two Chickasaw Indians as guides. Arriving Anes ten miles of the Muscle Shoals he sent forward some of his most active ‘4. > xHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. OL soldiers with one of the Chickasaw guides to reconnoiter. At 12 next day they struck the river at the lower end of the Muscle Shoals, and concealed themselves until night. After a futile attempt to capture some Indians it was determined to cross the Tennessee River that night. The soldiers who had been sent forward with the guide swam the river and, went up on the opposite bank to the eabins of an Indian village, which| they found empty, and securing a canoe returned to the main body on the north side of the river. On account of the leaky condition of the, canoe it was impossible to get across the river betore dayhght next morn- ing. A heavy rain coming on forced the men into the cabins until it ‘as over, and when the clouds cleared away they followed a well beaten path leading toward the west. At the distance of about six miles they came to Coldwater Creek, upon the opposite side of which was a number of cabins built upon low ground. The people of this village were sur- prised by this sudden invasion and fled precipitately to their boats pur- sued by such of the men as had crossed the creek. ‘This town was occupied by the Creeks. some French traders and a white woman. In the attack upon the Indians twenty-six of the Creek warriors were killed, as were also the three Frenchmen and the white woman. A large quantity of stores was secured in the town, and afterward the town itself was burned down and the domestic animals destroyed. Each of the Chickasaw Indian guides was presented with a horse, a gun and as many blankets and clothes as his horse could carry, and sent home. After dis- posing of the prisoners and goods, most of the latter being taken to Eaton’s Station, sold, and the proceeds distributed among the soldiers, the soldiers were disbanded on the nineteenth day after setting out on the expedition. This invasion of the Creek country was of great benefit to the Cumberland settlement, as it gave them peace and quiet for a con- siderable time, and discovered to them the sources whence the Indians were obtaining their supplies. But it was not entirely without disastrous, or at least threateningly disastrous, consequences. David Hay, of Nash- ville, attempted to carry on simultaneously, a campaign by water against the same Indians, with the view of assisting Gen. Robertson’s men, both in their warfare and in respect to supplying them with provisions in case they should be detained longer away from home than was anticipated, but unfortunately his company was led into an ambush, was attacked by the Indians and was obliged to return. Gen. Robertson’s campaign came very near involving him in difficulties with the French, who were carrying on trade with the Indians from the Wabash up the Tennessee. The cessation of hostilities procured by Gen. Robertson’s Coldwater ° . aN Pas oe ays campaign was of but temporary duration. Capt. John Rains, a vigilant a — " — Seof (a : COPTER Caer} J Mm het Ares LT a se i pemeneiinecacemsany eoienanielal cs ere eR eeTEetesensepeessiensesnuseeneennerptenenniemnn OY, HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. > S Ci palg! ns against the and intrepid Indian fighter, mai le three successful cam Ue Indians, and similar expeditions were ma a by others in every direction In 1788 the hostilities which still continued were throughout the country. k warriors, still under the malign influence of the committed by the Cree ttlements had been made on terr itory claimed by that Spaniards. As no se offensive war had been committed against Span- nation, and as no acts of | it Span it was determined to inquire into the reason for their insti- ish colonies. Gen. Robertson and Col. gation of these incursions upon the se sttlers. (vain Bledsoe. therefore, addressed a joint letter to the celebrated agent of the Creeks, McGilvery. To this communication the agent re- plied that the Cre .eks. in common with other southern Indians had adhered to the British interests during the late war, that alter peace was declared he had accepted proposals for friendship by the settlers, and that while these negotiations were pending, six of his nation were killed at Coldwater and their death had given rise to a violent clamor for revenge, and that the late expeditions by the Creeks had been undertaken for that purpose. But now as the affair at Coldwater had been amply retaliated he would use his best endeavors for veace. Immediately afterward, however, hos- tilities were renewed and Col. Anthony Bledsoe killed at the fort of his brother Isaac at Bledsoe’s Lick. At this time North Carolina was unable to assist her western settlements even had she been so disposed, and in their extremity it became absolutely necessary for Gen. Robertson to forget the murder of his friend Anthony Bledsoe, and to bring into play all the arts of diplomacy of which he was possessed in order to soothe the savage breast and to beget in him a peaceful, or at least a less warlike disposition. Dissembling the resentment which the cruel murder of his friend must have caused him to feel, he wrote to McGilvery acknowl- edging the satisfaction caused by the receipt of his letter, seemed to exten- ] uate the recent aggressions of the Creeks upon the settlers, and stated that he had caused a deed for a lot in Nashville to be recorded in his name. ‘T'o another letter from the Creek chief he replied that the Cum- berland settlers were not the people who had made encroachments upon Creek territory, and stated that the people of the Cumberland only claimed the land which the Cherokees had sold to Col. Hudson in Lito: atc, The right to the lands of the Lower Cum! betland was claimed by the Chickasaws rather than by the Cherokees at the time of the Revolue tionary war. Prior to that time the former tribe lived north of the Tennessee and about fifty miles lower down that stream than the Lower (Cherokee) Towns. They ceded the Cumberland lands in-1782 or 1783 at the treaty held by Donelson and Martin. rT rOyay Shea OCA OANA Sar ie hoe ; In 1786 commissioners were appointed by Congress to treat with theS O <= Kes = 7 ls Sane Na? —y\ LAN Se sel as E >» wl = = a> eT ayer 7 wey) ; SSS Rao é INNA DL LSVa ASse a ; c ae SSS SSS ie > QD atl i q = _ rx © pa THD 2 + x INVSNI re c e eT SNeee SS a ee, eeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 93 Cherokees and other southern tribes. These commissioners say in their report to Richard Henry Lee, president of Congress, ‘that there are some few pedple settled on the Indian lands whom we are to remove, and those in the fork of French Broad and Holston being numerous, the Indians agree to refer their particular situation to Congress and abide by their decision.” Although these persons had settled contrary to prea, stipulations entered into by Virginia and North Carolina in 1777, yet they were too numerous to order off, hence the necessity of obtaining the consent of the Cherokees to refer the matter to Congress. The same re- port furnishes an estimate of the number of warriors of the nations of Indians living south of the Tennessee and in reach of the advanced set- tlements which was as follows: Cherokees, 2,000; Creeks, 5,400; Chicka- saws. 800: Choctaws, 6,000—total number, 14,200, besides remnants of the Shawanees, Uchees and other tribes. That this number of warriors was not able with the assistance of northern tribes to crush out the settle- ments in what is now Tennessee in that early day is very remarkable, but is doubtless due in part to determination and courage of the whites. The year 1788 was distinguished by the unfortunate attempt of Col. James Brown to reach Nashville by the Tennessee, Ohio and Cumberland Rivers, related at such length in the chapter on settlements as to only need brief mention here in chronological order. The same year was distin- guished by the campaign against the Cherokees, by the attack on Sher- rell’s and Gillespie’s Stations. During the administration of Gov. Blount the policy of conciliation was persistently followed in obedience to instructions and proclamations from the President of the United States, Gen. Washington. An earnest attempt was made by both the authorities of the United States, and of the “ Territory of the United States south of the river Ohio,” to enforce treaty stipulations, but notwithstanding all that was or could be done by both Governments, both Indians and whites disregarded and violated all the treaties they should have observed. And while it was thus demon- strated and had been from the signing of the first treaty, that treaties were only a temporary make-shift, or subterfuge, yet both Nation and State kept on making treaty after treaty with the various tribes of Indians. In obedience to this treaty-making spirit another treaty was con- cluded July 2, 1791, at the treaty ground on the bank of Holston River, near the mouth of the French Broad, between the Cherokees of the one part and William Blount, governor in and for the “Territory of the United States of America south of the river Ohio,” and superintendent of Indian affairs for the southern district, of the other part, whereby the following boundary between the lands of the two parties was established: 61V AREY at estatccrc sD TEED teehee 7 Ni EN rasan eee : - RGIS ye Saosin gaan RS SE TE AT ar Ir aes x i on pda eee tng nee tite sap = > Sere cs: SL IE ~ 8 eR Retire eS Te ETE G4 HISLORY OF TENNESSEE. ArticLe4. The boundary between the citizens of the United States and the Cherokee nation is and shall be as follows: Beginning at the top of the Currahe e Mountain where the Creek line passes it; thence a direct line to Tugelo River; thence | northwest to the Occunna Mountain, and over the same along the South Carolina Indian bound- ary to the North Carolina boundary; thence north to a point trom which a line is to be extended to the river Clinch that shall pass the Holston at the ridge which divides the waters running into Little River from those running into the Pennessee; thence up the river Clinch to Campbell’s line, and along the same to the top of ie Cum- berland Mountain: thence a direct line to the Cumberland River where the Kentucky thence down the Cumberland River to a point from which a southwest ridge which divides the waters of Cumberland from those of down the said ridge to a point from road crosses it; line will strike the Duck River, forty miles above Nashville; thence whence a southwest line will strike the mouth of Duck River, It was agreed that all land lying to the right of ums POUnGan ys be- ginning at Currahee Mountain, should belong to the United States; and as a further consideration the Government stipulated to pay the Chero kees an annuity of $1,000, which was increased later by an additional ar- ticle to 81,500. All prisoners were to be surrendered, criminals pun- ished, whites settling on Indian lands to be denied the protection of the Government, whites to be granted the navigation of the Tennessee and to be permitted to use a road between Washington and Mero Districts, the Indians to be furnished with implements of husbandry, etc., ete. The witnesses signing this treaty were Daniel Smith, secretary of the Terri- tory of the United States south of the river Ohio; Thomas Kennedy, of Kentucky; James Robertson, of Mero District; Claiborne Watkins, of Vir- ginia; John McWhitney, of Georgia; Fauche, of Georgia; Titus Ogden, of North Carolina; John Chisholm, of Washington District; Robert King and Thomas Gregg. The official and sworn interpreters were John Thompson and James Ceery. Horty-one chiefs of the Cherokee nation were the contracting party for the Indians. The additional article of the treaty, which provided that $1,500 instead of $1,000 should be annually paid to the Cherokees, was agreed to between Henry Knox, Secretary of War, and seven chiefs, February 17, 1792 In 1793 a foree of E000 Indians, 700 of them Creeks, the rest Chero- kees, under the lead of John Watts and Double Head, 100 of the Creeks being well mounted horsemen, invaded the settlements with the view ot attacking Knoxville, but failing to surprise the citizens they abandoned their contemplated attack upon the town. Falling back they found it impossible to leave the country without carrying out in some degree their revengetul purposes, and so made an attack on Cavett’s Station. Here after suffering a temporary repulse they proposed that if the station would surrender they would spare the lives of the inmates and exchange them for an equal number of Indian prisoners. Relying upon these promises the inmates of the station surrendered, but no sooner had they passedHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 95 the door than Double Head and his party fell upon them and put them to death, and most horribly, barbarously and indelicately mutilated their bodies, especially those of the women and children. This daring invasion by the Creeks and Cherokees, under the cele- brated chief John Watts, convinced the Federal and also the Territorial authorities that defensive warfare was of but little if any use in prevent- ing Indian invasions. The people themselves had long been convinced of this fact, and earnestly desired a return to the tactics of Gen. Sevier. A sudden and decisive blow was loudly called for as the only means of punishment for the Indians and of defense for the settlements. Gen Sevier was once more the man to lead in a campaign of this kind. His little army then at Ish’s was re-enforced by troops under Col. John Blair for Washington District and Col. Christian for Hamilton Dis- trict. and with these forces Gen. Sevier made his last campaign against the Indians. Crossing Little Tennessee, near Lowry’s Ferry he came to an Indian town named Estinaula, and suffered a night attack from the Indians with the loss of one man wounded. Breaking camp in the night he went on toward Etowah, which place he succeeded in capturing after overcoming a determined resistance by the Indians under the com- mand of King Fisher, who, however, fell in the engagement. Atter be- ing defeated the Indians escaped into the secret recesses of the surround- ing country, and Gen. Sevier having burned the town and becoming satisfied that further pursuit would not meet with results commensurate with the exertion demanded, countermarched and the troops returned safely to their homes. Thus terminated the last campaign of Sevier, and the first for which he received compensation from the Government. In this campaign he lost three brave men. Pruett and Weir killed in the battle, and Wallace mortally wounded. A treaty was concluded at Philadelphia between Henry Knox, Secre- tary of War, and thirteen chiefs of the Cherokees, on the 26th of June, 1794, to set at rest certain misunderstandings concerning the prov isions of the treaty of Holston of July 2, 1791. It was declared that the treaty of Holston should in all particulars be valid and binding, and that the boundary line then established should be accurately defined and marked. In lieu of the annuity of $1,000 granted by the treaty of Holston in 1791, or the annuity of $1,500 g Pranted by the treaty of Philadelphia in 1792, the Government at this treaty of 1794 agreed to pay the annual sum of $5,000 to the Cherokees.» This treaty was attended by thirteen Cherokee chiefs. John Thompson and Arthur Coody were the official in- terpreters. The boundary prov ided in these treaties was not ascertained and marked until the latter part of 179%, by reason of which delay sev- SET ee See a a aE 2 ras| 1 96 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. iF i ph j ——— eral settlements of white people were established upon the Indian domain, These settlers were removed by authority of the Government, and two commissioners, George Walton, of Georgia, and Lieut. -Col. Thomas Butler, commander of the troops of the United States in the State of Tennessee, were appointed to adjust the mutual claims and rights of the These commissioners met thirty-nine ST ee white settlers and the Indians. . : Cb xxy Y , TO « 1 y authorized Cherokee chiefs, representing the whole Cherokee nation, ; ; . : 7 6) OO: 2- ‘ inthe council house of the Indians near Tellico, October 2, 1798, and th: The former V ) provislons, In sub stance, were mutual! y aQ reed to all the lands “from a point on the boundaries were to Cherokees ceded to the United States Tennessee River below Tellico Block-house, called the White Cat Rock, the Militia Spring near the Maryville road leading Shilhowee Mountain by a line Se in a direct line to from Tellico; from the said spring to the so to be run as will leave all the farms on Nine Mile Creek to the north- ward and eastward of it, and to be continued along Chilhowee Mountain thence along the said line to the Great until it strikes Hawkins’ line; Iron Mountain, and from the top of which a line to be continued in a’ southeastwardly course to where the most southwardly branch of Little River crosses the divisional line to Tugalo River. From the place of be- ginning, the Wild Cat Rock, down the northeast margin of the Tenres- see River (not including islands) to a point or place one mile above the junction of that river with the Clinch;and from thence by a line to be drawn ina right angle until it intersects Hawkins’ line leading from Clinch; thence down the said line to the river Clinch; thence up the said river to its junction with Emery River; thence up Emery River to the foot of Cumberland Mountains; from thence a line to be drawn northeast- wardly along the foot of the mountain until it intersects with Campbell’s line.” It was further understood that two commissioners, one to be ap- pointed by: each the Government and the Cherokee nation, were to run and mark the boundary line; that the annuity should be increased from $9,000 to $6,000 in goods; that the Kentucky road running between the Cumberland Mountains and the Cumberland River should be open and free to the white citizens as was the road from Southwest Point to Cum- berland River; that Indians might hunt upon the lands thus ceded until settlements should make it improper; that stolen horses should be either returned or paid for, and that the agent of the Government living among the Indians should have a piece of land reserved for his use. Elisha I. Hall was secretary of the commission; Silas Dinsmore. agent to the Cherokees; Edward Butler, captain commanding at Tellico, and Charles Hicks and James Casey were interpreters. mie nh a Sn a ee 7S ee (filHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The year 1794 was distinguished for the Nickajack expedition. The banditti Indians of the five Lower Towns on the Tennessee River contin- ued:to make attacks on the frontier settlements, and the frontiers de- termined to invade the towns as the only effectual means of self-defense, and of inflicting punishment upon the Indians for the injuries they had received. But as the Cumberland settlers were not of themselves Seton enough to successfully undertake an expedition, they appealed to the ae tial spirit of Kentucky to aid them in punishing an enemy from whom they had also been frequent sufferers. Col. Whitley of Kentucky entered ‘nto the scheme. Col. James Ford, of Montgomery, raised a company from near Clarksville; Col. John Montgomery brought a company from Clarksville, and Gen. Robertson raised a company of volunteers from Nashville and vicinity. Maj. Ore, who had been detached by Gov. Blount to protect the fron- tiers of Mero District, opportunely arrived at Nashville as the troops were concentrating for the Nickajack expedition, as it has ever since been known, and entered heartily into the project; Maj. Ore temporarily as- sumed command, and the expedition has sometimes been called ‘‘ Ore’s expedition.” Upon the arrival of the Kentucky troops, Col. Whitley was given command of the entire force, and Col. Montgomery of the volun- teers raised within the Territory Notwithstanding Col. Whitley having command of the little army, Gen. Robertson issued instructions to Maj. Ore, on the 6th of September, and on the next day, Sunday, the army set out upon its march. It crossed the Barren Fork of Duck River near the Stone Fort, and arrived at the Tennessee on the night of the 8th. Of the individuals present at this expedition were Joseph Brown, son of Col. James Brown, whose mel- ancholy fate is elsewhere recorded in this work; William Trousdale, afterward governor of ‘Tennessee, and Andrew Jackson. The troops having the next morning crossed the river, penetrated to the center of the town of Nickajack, a village inhabited by about 250 families. In this village the troops killed quite a number of warriors, and many oth- ers, while they were attempting to escape in canoes or swimming in the river. Highteen were taken prisoners and about seventy in all were killed; but this number includes those killed in the town of Running Water as well as those killed in Nickajack. When an attack was made on two isolated houses, one of the squaws remained outside to listen. She attempted to escape by flight, but after a hard chase was taken pris- oner, and carried up to the town and placed among the other prisoners, As these were being taken\down the river the squaw loosed in canoes. r, artfully disengaged her- her clothes, sprang head foremost into the rive ere - Mace Titeeel. a ae SR oa ET i a CER. “ hy . oe so . 4 o O& HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Ly a =m a CO EY teenie ey Pein en self from her clothing, left them floating on the water and swam rapid away. While thus making her escape, some of the soldiers cried out “ Shoot her! shoot her!” but others admiring her activity and courage re- strained those who were in favor of shooting her, by saying ‘‘ No, let her .’ With respect to the number killed, it escape, she is too smart to kill | was given to Joseph Brown some time afterward by a chief 1n conversa- tion at Tellico Block-house as seventy-six. By an act approved May 19, 1796, the following boundary between the United States and the Indian tribes for the States of Kentucky and ‘“ Beginning ata o> sl meeieetnee elegy ener Sed ene ae Tennessee was ordered surveyed and definitely marked. point on the highlands or ridge on the Ohio River between the mouth of the Cumberland and the mouth of the Tennessee River; thence east- erly along said ridge toa point from whence a southwest line will strike { thence still easterly on the said ridge to a Song a ea a ng as oo = , - = - - 7 es ER Ske TET ae ae RIN 7 n —— = Re a anenEenenneeemnmmneetionts the mouth of Duck River;* a point forty miles above Nashville; thence northeast to the Cumber- land River; thence up the said river to where the Kentucky road crosses the same; thence to the top of Cumberland Mountain; thence along Campbell’s line to the river Clinch; thence down the said river to a point from which a line shall pass the Holston at the ridge which divides the waters running into Little River from those running into the Tennessee: ee pn eS Sain eee thence south to the North Carolina boundary. ”’ At a treaty held at the Chickasaw Bluffs, October 24, 1801, between Brig.-Gen. James Wilkinson, Benjamin Hawkins, of North Carolina, and Andrew Pickens, of South Carolina, ‘and the Mingo, principal men and warriors of the Chickasaw nation,’ permission was given the United States to lay out and cut a wagon road between the settlements of the Mero District in Tennessee and those of Natchez on the Mississippi River. It was agreed that $700 should be paid the Indians to compen- sate them for furnishing guides and assistance. Seventeen Chickasaw chiefs signed the articles of the treaty. A treaty was held at Tellico, October 25, 1805, between Return Jona- than Meigs and Daniel Smith on the part of the United States, and thir- ty-three chiefs on the part of the Cherokees, by which the Indians ceded all their land north of the following boundary: “Beginning at the mouth of Duck River; running thence up the main stream of the same to the junction of the fork, at the head of which Fort Nash stood. with the main south fork; thence a direct course to a point on the Tennessee River bank opposite the mouth of Hiwassee River. If the line from Hiwassee should leave out Field’s settlement, it is to be marked round this im- provement and then continue the straight course; thence up the middle of *See treaty with the Chickasaws, January 10, 1786. i ( t t i a | a i bie : ie 7 mI a ae ane jean mescmesaaelpemusiaransauneemsensrsnine 1 Ca A oo (ALDER TBE SERENE Eapeas - en eae es kee =: Feeepeeecieenn eeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 99 the Tennessee River (but leaving all the islands to the Cherokees) to the mouth of Clinch River; thence up the Clinch River to the former boun- BRR Ges smal ocr a ving, - the same time, of Clinch River i Aerie ae. se i iS aay eee 1outh extending down the Tennessee River (from the mouth of Clinch) to a notable rock on the north bank of the Tennessee, in view from Southwest Point; thence a course at right angles with the river to the Cumberland road; thence eastwardly along the same to the bank of Clinch River-so as to secure the ferry landing to the Cherokees up to the first hill and down the same to the mouth there- of together w ith two other sections of one square mile each, one of which is at the foot of Cumberland Mountain, at and near where the turnpike gate now stands, the other on the north bank of the Tennessee River where the Cherokee Talootiske now lives. And whereas, from the present cessions-made by the Cherokees, and other circumstances, the size of the garrisons at Southwest Point and Tellico are Pane not the most convenient and suitable places for the accommodation of the said Indians, it may become expedient to remove the said garrisons and fac- tory to some more suitable place, three other square miles are reserved for the partic ‘ular disposal of the United States on the north bank of the Tennessee opposite to and below the mouth of Hiwassee. ” In consider- ation of this cession the Government agree to pay the Indians $3,000 im- mediately in valuable merchandise, and $11,000 w ae ninety days after the ratification of the treaty and also an annuity of $3,000 to begin im- mediately. The Indians, at their option, might oe valuable machines for agriculture and useful domestic or hunting articles out of the $11,000. The Government was also to have the “free and unmolested use” of two new roads ‘‘one to proceed from some convenient place near the head of Stone’s River and fall into the Georgia road at a suitable place toward the southern frontier of the Cherokees; the other to procee 11 from the neighborhood of Franklin or Big Harpeth, and crossing the Tennessee at or near the Muscle Shoals, to pursue the nearest and best way to the set- tlements on the Tombigbee. At Tellico, on the 27th of October, 1500, two davs after the above treaty, the same commissioners (Meigs and Smith ) eoncluded an addi- herokee chiefs, the following being a portion ‘ Whereas, it has been repr esented section of land on which the gar- is likely tional treaty with fourteen C of one of the articles of such treaty: by the one party to the other, that the rison of Southwest Point stands and which extends to Kingston, to become a desirable place for the assembly of the State of Tennessee to convene at (a committee from that body now in session having viewed- p i Ee a — ee nal Fn as ae ” _ _ Me ~ aa . 5 - C a ry a fe Te me MT UM TUNG Time a Tt capers Te ey” BF F sft = i ea , ee . ‘ La ea ee ne eres Bare, a = oa } a] a i ea a 100 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. the situation), now, the Cherokees being possessed of a spirit of concilia- tion, and seeing that this tract is desired for public purposes and not for individual advantages, reserving the ferries to themselves, quitclaim and cede to the United States the said section of land, understanding, at the same time, that the buildings erected by the public are to belong to the public, as well as the occupation of the same, during une pleasure ok the Government. We also cede to the United States the first island in the Tennessee above the mouth of Clinch | River |.” It was also agreed that mail which had been ordered to be carried from Knoxville to New Orleans through the Cherokee, Creek and Choc- taw countries, should not be molested by the former nation over the Tel- lico and Tombigbee road; and that the Government should pay for the Puccdcdiaciahore: described $1,600 in money or merchandise, at the option of the Indians, within ninety days after the ratification of the treaty. Onethe 23d of July, 1805, at a treaty concluded in the Chickasaw country between James Robertson and Silas Dinsmore and the chiefs of the Chickasaws, the latter ceded the following tract of land to the United States: “ Beginning at the left bank of. [the] Ohio at the point ‘where the present Indian boundary adjoins the same: thence down the left bank of Ohio to the Tennessee River: thence up the main channel of the Tennessee River to the mouth of Duck River; thence up the left bank of Duck River to the Columbian highway or road leading from Nashville to Natchez; thence along the said road to the ridge dividing the waters running into Duck River from those running into Buffalo River: thence eastwardly along the said ridge to the great ridge dividing the waters running into the main Tennessee River from those running into Buffalo River near the main source of Buffalo River; thence in a direct line to the great Tennessee River near the Chickasaw Old Fields, or eastern point of the Chickasaw claim, on that river: thence northwardly to the great ridge dividing the waters running into the Tennessee from those running into the Cumberland River so as to include all the waters run- ning into Elk River; thence along the top of said ridge to the place of beginning ; reserving a tract of one mile Square adjoining to and below the mouth of Duck River on the Tennessee, for the use of the chief, Okoy, or Lishmastubbee. The commissioners agreed to pay $20,000 for the use of the nation and for the payments of its debts to traders, ete., and to pay George Colbert and Okoy $1,000 each. These sums were granted these head men upon the request of the Chickasaw delegation, as a reward for distinguished services rendered the nation; also, the head chief of the nation, Chinnubbee, was granted an annuity of $100 duringHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. LOL the remainder of “his natural life,” ‘‘as a testimony of his personal worth and friendly disposition.” Two dollars per day was ordered paid an agent of the Chickasaws appointed to assist in running and marking the boundary above described. | 2 On the 7th of January, 1806, at the city of Washington, a treaty was held between Henry Dearborn, Secretary of War, and Double Head, James Vann, Tallotiska, Chuleoah, Sour Mush, Turtle at Home, Katihu, John McLemore, Broom, John Jolly, John Lowry, Red Bird, John Walker, Young Woll, Skewha, Sequechu and William Showry, chiefs and head men of the Cherokees, Charles Hicks serving as inter: preter, and Return J. Meigs, Benjamin Hawkins, Daniel Smith, John Smith, Andrew McClary and John McClary as witnesses, hereby the following was agreed upon: The Cherokee nation ceded to the United States ‘all that tract of country which lies to the northward of the river Tennessee, and westward of a line to be run from the upper part of the Chickasaw Old Fields at the upper part of an island called Chickasaw Is- land on said river, to the most easterly head waters of that branch of said Tennessee River called Duck River, excepting the two following tracts, viz.: one tract bounded southerly on the said Tennessee River at a place called the Muscle Shoals, westerly by a ereek called Tekeetanoah or Cypress Greek, and easterly by Chuwalée or Elk River or creek, and northerly by a line to be drawn from a point on said Elk River, ten miles nouth or junction with Tennessee River, to a k. ten miles on a direct line from its junc- The other tract is to be two miles in width on a direct line from its 1 point on the said Cypress Cree 4ion with the Tennessee River. ‘de of Tennessee River and to extend northerly from on the north s s follows, viz.; Beginning at the that river three miles and bounded a mouth of Spring Creek and running up said creek three miles on a straight line; thence westerly reek; thence southerly on a line parallel with the general thence up said river by its two miles at right angles with the general course of said ¢ course of said creek to the Tennessee River; waters to the beginning—which first reserved tract is to be considered the common property of the Cherokees who now live on the same, including and the other reserved tract, John D. Chisholm, Autowe and Chechout; on which Moses Milton now lives, is to be considered the property of said Milton and Charles Hicks in equal shares. And the said chiefs and head men also agree to relinquish to the United States all right or claim which they or their nation have to what is called the Long Tsland in Holston River.”’ In consideration of th agreed to pay 89000 to the Indians < e relinquishment of this land the United States as soon as the treaty was ratified by Sec RIES aa ne LASS eee Se es aes Ste et ii Soo |a teens ee ES 7 PE Cte ay aie Cp actin Seuecaetedtnalocen avai Ree A Og eaten RESIST i INN RO SE aa aS. a I NS i See oan TEpEEeer ate 2a RTS A nc aoe oN a Setapeeieervanheetineecementoeeaee ee 102 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. > Presi $2,000 on each of the four succeeding years, or in all the President, and $2,000 on oe ~ ~ . . . Y A = 1a . 5 - % a 3 $10,000; and agreed to build a grist-mill in the Cherokee country for the use of the nation; to furnish a machine for cleaning cotton; to pay annu- ally to the old chief, Eunolee, or Black Fox, during the remainder of his life $100, and to settle the claims of the Chickasaws on the two res- Apparently, the terms of this treaty required another meeting between James ervations described above. elucidation, as, September 11, 180 Robertson and Return J. Meigs and a delegation of Cherokees, of whom Black Fox was one, was held ‘‘at the point of departure of the line at the upper end of the island opposite to the upper part of the said Chickasaw Old Fields,” on which occasion the following was fixed as the eastern limits of the ceded tract: ‘A line so to be run from the upper end of the Chickasaw Old Fields a little above the upper part of an island called Chickasaw Island, as will most directly intersect the first waters of Elk River; thence carried to the great Cumberland Mountain, in which the waters of Elk River have their source; then along the margin of said mountain until it shall intersect lands heretofore ceded to the United States at the said Tennessee Ridge.” It was also agreed that $2,000 should be paid to the Cherokees to meet their expenses at this council or ( treaty, and that the Cherokee hunters might hunt over the ceded tract “until, by the fullness of settlers, it shall become improper.’ Eunolee, or Black Fox; Fauquitee, or Glass; Fulaquokoko, or Turtle at Home: Richard Brown and Sowolotaw, or King’s Brother. signed this ‘‘decla- ration of intention.” The following treaty or agreement with reference to the cultivation of a certain tract of ground by the proprietors of the Unicoi road was entered into July 8, 1817: We, the undersigned chiefs of the Cherokee nation. do hereby grant unto Nicholas Byers, Arthur H. Henly and David Russell, proprietors of the Unicoy road to Georgia, the liberty of cultivating all the ground contained in the bend on the north side of Ten- nessee River, opposite and below Chota Old Town, tovether with the liberty to erect a grist-mill on Four Mile Creck, for the use and benefit of said road and the Cherokees in the neighborhood thereof; for them, the said Byers, Henly and Russell, to have and to hold the above privileges during the term of use of the Unicoy road, also obtained from the Cherokees and sanctioned by the President of the United States. At a treaty between Isaac Shelby and Andrew Jackson and the “chiets, head men and warriors” of the Chickasaw nation held on the 19th of October, 1818, “at the treaty ground east of Old Town, the Indians ceded lands as follows: The land lying north of the south boundary of the State of Tennessee, which is bounded south by the thirty-fifth degree of north latitude, and which lands hereby ceded lie within the foll wing bound- ary, Viz. : Beginning on the Tennessee River about thirty-five miles by water below Col. George Colbert’s ferry, where the thirty-fifth degree ofHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 1038 north latitude strikes the same; thence due west with said degree of north latitude to where it cuts the Mississippi River at or near the Chickasaw Bluffs; thence up the said Mississippi River to the mouth of the Ohio; thence up the Ohio River to the mouth of the Tennessee River: thence up the Tennessee River to the place of beginning.” | In consideration of this valuable cession “and to perpetuate the hap- piness of the Chickasaw nation” the Government agreed to allow the In- dians an annuity of $20,000 for fifteen successive years; also to allow and also to allow Capt. David Smith, of Kentucky, $2,000 to reimburse him and forty-five soldiers of Tennessee in assisting in the defense of Capt. John Gordon, of Tennessee, $1,115 due him from the Chickasaws, their towns (upon their request) against the attacks of the Creek Indians in 1795. A reservation in the above tract was retained by the Indians. T+ contained four miles square of land, including a salt spring or lick on or near Sandy River, a branch of the Tennessee. The Chickasaw chief, Levi Colbert and Maj. James Brown were constituted agents to lease the salt licks to a citizen or citizens of the United States for the benefit of the Indians, a certain quantity of salt to be paid therefor annually to the nation; and after two years from the date of the ratification of the treaty no salt was to be sold higher than $1 per bushel of fifty pounds weight. The Government further agreed to pay to Oppassantubbee, a principal chief of the Chickasaws, $500 for his two-mile reservation on the north side of the Tennessee River; retained September 20, 1816, to pay John Lewis, a half-breed, $25 for a lost saddle while serving the United States; to pay Maj. James Colbert $1,089; which had been taken from his pocket in June. 1816, at a theater in Baltimore. Also to give upon the ratification of the treaty to the following named chiefs $150 each: Chinnubbee, king of the Chickasaws; Teshuahmin- go, William MecGibvery, Oppassantubee, Samuel Seely, James Brown, Levi Colbert, Iskarweuttaba, George Pettigrove, Immartoibarmicco, and Malcolm McGee, interpreter; and to Maj. William Glover, Col. George Colbert, Hopoyeabaummer, Immauklusharhopoyea, Tushkaihopoye, Hop- oyebaummer, Jr.. James Colbert, Coweamarthlar and Illachouwarhopo- yea, $100 each. At a treaty with the Cherokees held at Washington City, February 27 1819, the Indians ceded the following tract of country: a 3 All of their lands lying north and east of the following line, viz.: Beginning on the Ten nessee River at the point where the Cherokee boundary with Madison County in Alabama Territory joins the same; thence along the main channel of said river to the mouth of the Hiwassee; thence along its main channel to the first hill which closes in on said river about two miles above Hiwassee; thence along the ridge which divides the waters of the Hiwassee and Little Tellico, to the Tennesee River at Telassee; thence along the main channel to the junction of the Cowee and Nauteyalee; thence along the ridge in the fork ofTESTA ATA Mena eeuatoreetha tart mith . RNY ' SF ED eae ~~ FR a " mi ay: - RATT bale TA ae TL a a <= ee r ng pT Rh MS ig 104 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE, said river to the top of the Blue Ridge; thence along the Blue Ridge to she hee pike road; thence by a straight line to the nearest main source ot aoe C nee ene along its main channel to the Chatahouchee, and thence to the Greek aon a , ee understood that all the islandsin the Chestatee, and the parts of the Tennessee and i- wassee (with the exception of Jolly Island in the Tennessee near the a of the Hiw as- see) which constitutes a portion of the present boundary, belong to the Cherokee nation. ? Art. 3. It is also understood and agreed by the contracting parties, that a reserva- tion in fee simple, of six hundred and forty acres square, with the exception of ey Walker’s which is to be located as is hereafter provided, to include their Improvements, and which are to be as near the center thereof as possible, shall be made Le each of the persons whose names are inscribed on the certified list annexed to Da ea, all a Ww nom are believed to be persons of industry, and capable of managing their property with dis- cretion and have, with few exceptions, made considerable improvements on the tracts re- served. The reservations are made on the condition that those for whom they are intended shall notify in writing to the agent for the Cherokee nation within six months after the ratifi- cation of this treaty that it is their intention to continue to reside permanently on the land reserved. The reservation for Lewis Ross so to be laid off as to include his house and out- buildings and ferry adjoining the Cherokee agency, reserving to the United States all the public property there and the continuance of the said agency where it now is during the pleasure of the Government; and Maj. Walker’s so as to include his dwelling house and ferry, for Maj. Walker an additional reservation is made of 640 acres square, to include his grist and saw-mill; the land is poor and principally valuable for its timber. In addi- tion to the above reservations the following are made in fee simple, the persons for whom they are intended not residing on the same: To Cobbin Smith 640 acres, to be laid off in equal parts on both sides of his ferry on Tellico, commonly called Blair’s ferry; to John Ross 640 acres, to be laid off so as to include the 3ig Island in Tennessee River. being the first below Tellico, which tracts of land were given Many years since by the Cherokee nation to them; to Mrs. Eliza Ross, step-daughter of Maj. Walker, 640 acres square, to be located on the river below and adjoining Maj. Walker’s; to Margaret Morgan 640 acres square to be located on the west of and adjoining James Riley’s reservation: to George Harlin 640 acres square, to be located west of and adjoining the reservation of Margaret Morgan; to James Lowry 640 acres square, to be located at Crow Mocker’s old place, at the foot of Cumberland Mountain; to Susannah Lowry 640 acres, to be located at the Toll Bridge on Battle Creek; to Nicholas Byers 640 acres, including the Toqua Island, to be lo- cated on the north bank of the Tennessee opposite to said island. Immediately after the ratification of this treaty North Carolina ap- pointed commissioners and surveyors to survey and sell the lands ac- quired within her limits under the treaty. These commissioners and surveyors performed their duties without knowing what reservations would be taken by the Indians, or where they would be located. Subse- quently to the sale by the State, commissioners were sent out by the United States Government to survey and lay off the reservations for those Indians who claimed under the treaty. The consequence was that nearly all the reservations conflicted with lands previously sold by the State Com- missioners to citizens, a number of whom had sold their homesteads in older settled portions of the State, and had moved to the newly acquired “Robert McLemore, John Bald ridge, Lewis Ross, Fox Taylor, Rd. Timberlake, David Fields (to include his niill), James Brown (to include his field by the long pond), William Brown, John Brown, Elizabeth Lowry, George Lowry, John Benze, Mrs. Elizabeth Peck, John Walker, Sr., John Walker, Jr., Richard Taylor, John McIntosh, James Starr, Samuel Parks, The Old Bark (of Chota)—total 20. (Only those are here given whose reserves were in Tennessee. ) °HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 105 territory. These conflicting claims caused much disturbance, the pur- chasers from the State commissioners looking to the State to make their title valid, and the Indians looking to the United States to make their title valid. A great many suits were brought by the Indians in the courts of North Carolina against citizens who had taken possession under titles obtained from the State of North Carolina, and one case was carried to the supreme court of the State and decided in favor ot the Teen Clearly perceiving the disagreeable results that must ensue from a con- tinuance of this state of things, North Carolina felt compelled to take prompt measures for the relief of the citizens to whom fete had sold these lands. Time would not permit application to the General Govern- ment to extinguish the Indian title, and she therefore took the only course left open for her to pursue, viz.: to appoint commissioners of er own to purchase of the Indians their claims to the lands. ‘This purchase was effected at a cost to the State of $19,969, besides incidental expenses, the entire sum expended by the State in this matter being $22,000. North Carolina then made application to Congress for the reimbursement to her treasury of this sum, basing her claim for reimbursement on the two First—That the General Government had no power following reasons: of the soil within the limits of any to exercise any control over any part of the- original Siotes. and that the injury sustained by North Carolina resulted from the act of the General Government in the assumption and exercise of this power as set forth in this treaty, and which was a viola- tion of the rights and sovereignty of the State. Second—That the gen- eral policy of the General Government has been to extinguish Indian titles to land within the States when’she could do so. The first proposi- at considerable length and the second was sustained of Hopewell, 1789, and of Holston, 1791: The application of North Carolina for the repayment to her of $22,000 was granted by Congress in an act approved May 9, 1828. Soon after the conclusion of-the above treaty the following agreement with reference of a road from the Tennessee to the Tu- tion was discussed by extracts from the treaties to the laying out and opening galo River was made and entered into: CHEROKEE AGENCY, HIWASSEE GARRISON. d councilors of the Cherokees, in full council assembled, do hereby give, Nicholas Byers and David Russell, who are agents in belialf of the States of Tennessee and Georgia, full power and authority to es- tablish a turnpike company to be composed of them, the said Nicholas and David, Arthur Henly, John Lowry, Atto and one other person, by them to be hereafter named in behalt of the State of Georgia, and the above named-person are authorized to nominate five prop er and fit persons, natives of the Cherokees, who, together with the white men aforesaid, are to constitute the company; which said company when thus established, are hereby fully authorized by us to lay out and open & road from the most suitable point on the We the undersigned chiefs an e, grant and make over unto sa a i NOTE mg niange tear —voal % 106 HISTORY OF TENNESSER. Tennessee River, to be directed the nearest and best way to the highest point of navigation on the Tugalo River; which said road when opened and established shall continu > and re: main a free and public highway, unmolested by us, to the interest and benefit of the said company and their successors, for the full term of twenty years yet to come after the same may be opened and complete; after which time said road with all its advantages shall be r And the said company shall surrendered up and reverted im the said Cherokee nation. have leave, and are hereby authorized, to erect their public stands, or houses of entertain- ment, on said road, that is to say: One at each end and one in the middle, or as nearly so as a good situation will permit, with leave also to cultivate one hundred acres of land on each end of the road and fifty acres at the middle stand, with a privilege of a sufficiency of timber for the use and consumption of said stands. And the said turnpike company do hereby agree to pay the sum of $160 yearly to the Cherokee nation for the aforesaid priv- en et eR menses ae = Art lege, to commence after said road is opened and in complete operation. The said com- pany are to have the benefit of one ferry on Tennessee River, and such other ferry or fer- ries as are necessary on said road, and likewise said company shall have the exclusive priv- ilege of trading on said road during the aforesaid term of time. In testimony of our full consent to all and singular the above named privileges and ad- vantages, we have hereunto set our hands and affixed our seals this eighth day of March, eighteen hundred and thirteen OU-TA-HE-LEE Bra CABBIN, OO-SEE-KEE, THE-LA-GATH-A-HEE, NETTLE CARRIER, CHU-LA-00, Two KILLERS, JOHN WALKER, W AU-SA-WAY, JOHN Boaas, NA-AH-REE, THE BARK, CUR-A-HEE, THE RAVEN, SEE-KEE-KEE, T00-CHA-LEE, TE-IS-TIS-KEE, Dick Brown, Dick JUSTICE, QUO-TI-QUAS-KER, CHARLES HIcks. The foregoing agreement and grant was amicably negotiated and concluded in my presence. {ETURN J. MEIGS, Agent to the Cherokees. I certify I believe the within to be a correct copy of the original. WASHINGTON City, March 1, 1819 CHARLES Hicks, Agent to the Cherokees. On the 15th of November, 1819, the Legislature of Tennessee passed an act to dispose of the lands in the former Cherokee hunting grounds between the rivers Hiwassee and Tennessee, and north of the Little Ten- nessee. ‘The act provided that three commissioners should be appointed to superintend the sale of these lands. that no one person should be al- lowed to purchase for himself more than 640 acres, and 320 acres for each of his children, and that no land should be sold for less than $2. per acre. By this act the Unicoi Turnpike Company was permitted to retain, possess and enjoy all the franchises yielded to them by the Cherokees in the treaty of February 27, 1819, together with the use and eo th occupancy of 250 acres of land convenient to the public house then occupied by Maj. Henry Stephens during the continuance of the orant. Fie nes er. A few days pre- vious to the passage of the above act, the Legislature of Tennessee passed an act (October 23, 1819) for the adjudication of the North Se Wille athens st co ee en \ a i oe : atl edit eee alate ee an ~ 4 se eee et i CECT TUTE ne ae i ow Carolina | and claims ¢g ‘or satistvi = ee ae | | é C ee ne for satisfying the same by an appropriation of the va- f : i can SOl S¢ LU 2: T = \F 3 > a a4 ‘ r:NMAaAFf , . . Hi ‘ : south and west of the congressional reservation line, and ex- te ek tending to the Mississippi River. This territory LV] i g to the Mississippi River. This territory was divided into seven iT ) a i | a om ‘a ! 1 He ; = ey it ) Hi ® UEHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. LOT districts. numbered from the seventh to the thirteenth inclusive, all of these districts being definitely bounded in the second section of this act. The “congressional reservation line’? was deseribed in an act of Congress, approved April 18, 1806, entitled “an act to authorize the State of Tennessee to issue grants and perfect titles to certain lands therein described, and to settle the claims to the vacant lands within the same. Following is the description of the line: ‘‘ Beginning at the place where the eastern or main branch of Elk River shall intersect the southern boundary line otf the State of Tennessee; from thence anno due north until said line shall intersect the northern or main branch s Duck River; thence down the waters of Duck River to the military boundary line as established by the seventh section of an act of the State of North Carolina entitled ‘an act for the relief of the officers and sol- diers of the continental lne and for other purposes’ passed in the year 1783: thence with the military boundary line west to the place where it ‘ntersects the Tennessee River; thence down the waters of the river Ten- nessee to the place where the same intersects the northern boundary line of the State of Tennessee. ” With reference to the departure ol the Cherokee Indians from the State of Tennessee, it is proper to observe that early in this century they were divided into the Lower and Upper Towns: the Lower Towns clinging to the hunter life, and the Upper In 1808 delegations from b« th parties called upon the President 1 to remove to Govern- Towns wishing to assimilate with the whites. of the United States—the former to express a wis! ment lands west of the Mississippi. On July 8, 1817. lands were ceded to the United States in exchange for lands on the Arkansas and White Rivers, and under this arrangement 3 000 moved in 1818. Then followed the treaty of 1819. after which the Cherokees had left east of the Missis- sippi River about 8,000 square miles of territory, chiefly in the State of Georgia. The last treaty made with the Chic 19. 1818, at which they ceded all their lands nort tween the Tennessee and Mississipp1 Rivers, for ce olberts, influential men ot the tribe, favorable terms for the Chickasaws. By the United States all their re- kasaws was under date of October h ot Mississippl be- rtain specified annual payments, the C aware of the value of the lands, securing unusually treaties of 1832 and 1834 they ceeded to maining lands east of the Mississippi River. It is difficult to obtain accurate statistics with reg of the various Indian tribes residing within the limits of Tennessee at any specified period previous to 1860. There was taken no valuable census of the Indian population previous to 1825, and then 1t was taken ard to the numbersene are es . es Fp es et aes a i PUT Th ilk LTTE PRETO PRA esetsren., RE eT = er mee y* - 112 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. _ /Ce ALtEY U eat a populous industrious and prosperous commonwealth. After the death Pet and Ox ; auti- ae eerationtectin toward the west, and extended into the bea iti ful valley of Vireinia. In 1690 the settlements reached ats BUn Sols. ‘plorations of the great West were soo— ufterward undertaken. In and explorations « Ope awood. thenllieutouent 1714. according to Ramsey, Col. Alexander Spottswood, then tleutenant- 5 © cn eey : pau Pie aca Oo AOe “ Oo rernor of Virginia, passed, and was the first to pass the Great Blue Oe ere 7] liscovered a horse-pass Hills. and his attendants, on account of having discovered a ee ab ay 9 , ~ Qc 7 ~ ' z oO were called “Knights of the Horse Shoe. It has been said that during Cc 7 oN yy Avo 1c this tour Gov. Spottswood passed Cumberland Gap, and conferred this she x ains e river, which they have ever name upon the gap, the mountains and th 3 y since retained, but this is probably an error. (1714) M. Charleville, a French trader from Crozat’s colony, at New Or- : . . 1 : came among the Shawanees, then living upon the Cumberland His store was upon a mound, on During the same year leans, River, and opened trade with them. 7 ‘ the present site of Nashville, west of the Cumberland River, near French Lick Creek, and about seventy yards from each stream. Butitis thought M. Charleville could not have remained long, for about this time the Chickasaws and Cherokees made a combined attack upon the Shawanees, and drove them from their numerous villages along the lower Cumber- land. Evidently it was the design of the French at that time to exclude the English from the valley of the Mississippi and to confine their colonies to narrow limits along the Atlantic coast. In order to accomplish this purpose they endeavored to enlist in their behalf the native Indian tribes. Traders from Carolina having ventured to the countries of the Choctaws and Chickasaws had been driven from their villages through the influence of Bienville, France claiming the entire valley of the Miss- issippi by priority of discovery. According to Adair the eastern bound- aries of the territory at that time claimed by the French extended to the head springs of the Alleghany and Monongahela, of the Kanawha and of the T'ennessee. One half mile from the head of the Savannah was “Herbert’s Spring,” the water from which flows to the Mississippi, and strangers who drank of it would say they had tasted ‘French waters:” and the application of the name ‘French Broad” to the river now known by that name is thus explained. Traders and hunters from Caro- lina in passing from the head waters of Broad River. and falling upon those of the stream with which they inosculate west of the mountains. and hearing of the French claim would naturally call the newly discoy- ered stream the “‘ French Broad.” Not long after this the French built and garrisoned Fort Toulouse, at the confluence of the Coosa and Talla- poosa; Tombeckbee in the Choctaw country; Assumption, on the Chick-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 113 asaw Bluff, and Paducah, at the mouth of the Cumberland, and numerous trading posts along the Tennessee, indicative of their intention to main- tain possession of the country. To counteract the influence of the French and to frustrate their de- signs the English sent out Sir Alexander Cumming to treat with the Cherokees, who at that time occupied the country in the vicinity of the source of the Savannah River and back therefrom to and beyond the Ap- palachian chain of mountains. Summoning the Lower, Middle Valley and Overhill tribes, Sir Alexander met the chiefs of the Cherokee towns at Nequassa, In April, 1730, informed them by whom he was sent and demanded of them obedience to King George. The chiefs, falling upon their knees, solemnly promised what was demanded, and Sir Alexander, with their unanimous consent, nominated Moytoy, of Telliquo,* com- mander-in-chief of the Cherokee nation. The crown was brought from Tenassee,+ their chief town, which together with five eagle feathers and four scalps, taken from the heads of their enemies, they requested Sir Alexander to lay at his sovereign’s feet. As has been seen above it was the policy of France to unite the ex- tremes of her North American possessions by a cordon of forts along the Mississippi River; but the Chickasaws had hitherto formed an obstacle to the accomplishment of this design. This tribe of Indians was con- sidered inimical to the purposes of the French, and hence the French resolved upon their subjugation. A joint invasion was therefore made into their country by Bienville and D’Artuquette, which resulted dis- astrously to the invaders. The French, however, not to be deterred by disaster, toward the last of June, 1739, sent an army of 1,200 white men and double that number of red and black men, who took up their quar- ters in Fort Assumption, on the bluff of Memphis. The recruits from Canada sank under the torridity of the climate. In March, 1740, the small detachment proceeded to the Chickasaw country. They were met by messengers who supplicated for peace, and Bienville gladly accepted the calumet. The fort at Memphis was razed, and the Chickasaws re- mained the undoubted lords of the country. Thus did the present territory of Tennessee again rid itself of civil- ization, almost precisely two centuries after De Soto built his pivaguas near the site of the razed Fort Assumption, on the banks of the Missis- sippi. But civilization can not be restrained. Settlements were gradu- ally extending from the Atlantic colonies toward Tennessee. In 1740 * Probably the modern Tellico. + Tenassee was on the west bank of the present Little D Tellico, and afterward gave its name to Tennessee River and the State. {Bancroft Tennessee River, a few miles above the mouth ofie — - ide eee 114 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. there was a handsome fort at Augusta garrisoned by twelve or fifteen men, besides officers, and the boundary line between Virginia and North Carolina was extended in 1749 by commissioners appointed by their re- spective Legislatures to Holston River, directly opposite Steep Rock. According to Haywood the Holston River was discovered by and settled upon by a man of that name. which event must therefore have occurred previous to 1749. Fort Dobbs was built in 1756, about twenty miles west of Salisbury, in accordance with the terms of a treaty between Col. Waddle and Attakullakulla, the Little Carpenter, in behalf of the Chero- kees. But to this treaty the Indians paid little attention, and hence it became necessary for Goy. Glenn, of South Carolina, to make an alliance with the lneians for the purpose of securing peace and protection to the frontier settlements. This alliance or treaty was made in Lvb5) ab which a large cession of territory was made to the King of Great Britain, whom Goy. Glenn represented, and soon afterward Goy. Glenn built Fort Prince George upon and near the source of the Savannah River, 300 miles from Charleston, and in the immediate proximity of an Indian town named Keown. In the spring of 1756 the Earl of Loudon, who had been appointed commander of the King’s troops in America and governor of Virginia, sent Andrew Lewis out to build another fort on the southern bank of the Little Tennessee River, above the mouth of Tellico River, nearly opposite the spot upon which Tellico Block-house was afterward erected and about thirty miles from the site of Knoxville. Lewis named the structure Fort Loudon, in honor of the Earl. This fort is remarkable as being the first erected in Tennessee by the English, but authorities differ as to the year in which it was erected—some say in 1756, others in 1757. In 1758 Col. Bird, of Virginia, erected Long Island Fort, on the north bank of the Holston, nearly opposite the upper end of Long Island. At this time the line between Virginia and North Carolina had not been extended beyond Steep Rock Creek, and this fort was thought to be in Virginia, but as the line when extended passed north of the fort, the Virginians have the honor of having erected the second Anglo-American fort within the limits of Tennessee. | While these events were taking place, numerous traders were making their way from the Atlantic coast to the south and west. In 1690 Doherty, a trader from Virginia, visited the Cherokees, and in 1730 Adair, from South Carolina, extended his tour through the towns of this tribe. In 1740 other traders employed a Mr. Vaughn as packman to transport their goods. These traders passed to the westward along the Tennessee below the Muscle Shoals, and there came in competition with other trad-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 11d ers from New Orleans and Mobile. Those who returned to northern markets were usually heavily laden with peltries which sold at highly re- munerative prices. A hatchet, a pocket looking-glass or a piece of scarlet cloth and other articles which cost but little and were of but little intrin- sic value would command among the Indians on the Hiwassee or the Tennessee peltries which could be sold for forty times their original cost ‘n Charleston or Philadelphia. It is worthy of remarkthat most of these traders were Scotchmen who had been but a short time in the county, who were thus at peace with the Indians, and the commerce which they carried on proved a source of great profit and was with them for a time a monopoly. But this monopoly was not to be permitted long to continue. The cupidity of frontier hunters became excited as they perceived the heavily laden trader or packman returning from the far Western wilder- ness which they had not yet ventured to penetrate ; and as game became scarce in their own accustomed haunts east of the mountains they soon began to accompany the traders to the West and to trap and hunt on their own account. But these hunters and traders can scarcely be considered the precur- sors of the pioneer settlers of Tennessee. In 1748 Dr. Thomas Walker, of Virginia, In company with Cols. Wood, Patton and Buchanan and Capt. Charles Campbell, made an exploring tour upon the Western waters. Passing Powell’s Valley he gave the name “Cumberland” to the lofty range of mountains on the west of the valley. Tracing this range in 4 southwest direction he came to a remarkable depression in the chain. Through this depression he passed, ealling it “ Cumberland Gap.” West of the range of mountains he found a beautiful mountain stream to which he gave the name of “Cumberland River, ” all in honor of the Duke of Cumberland, then Prime Minister of England. The Indian name of the river was Warito. On account of the supposition that the Virginia line, if extended westward, would run south of its present location, a grant of land was made by the authorities in Virginia to Edmund Pendleton of 3.000 acres lying in Augusta County on a branch of the middle fork of the Indian River, called West Creek, now in Sullivan County, Tenn. The original patent was signed by Gov. Dinwiddie, was presented to! Die Ramsey by T. A. R. Nelson, of Jonesboro, and is probably the oldest patent in the State. In 1760 Dr. Walker again passed over Clinch and Powell Rivers on a tour of exploration into Kentucky. At the head of one of the parties that visited the West in 1761 “ came Daniel Boone, from the Yadkin in North Carolina, and traveled with them as low as the place where Abing- don now stands and there left them.” This is the first time the name of a ES a} f H t i i { | ta 7 a a 3 tit ; = . a' 7 e oe +} t \ = | : : 7 Ww oF } i th Wy om PF | oe ae Sie ag gg weit a tne a ee rh : ~ as an article to quiet the fears of the Indians while the oc- cupancy of their country went on all the same. In addition to the na- tural stimulus to this tide of immigration, of the immense advantages of the soil and climate, was the artificial stimulus of special grants of land by the provinces of Great Britain, with the approval of the crown, to offi- cers and soldiers who had > «ved in the British Army against the French and their allies, the Indisxs. Thus the King’s proclamation was in dl- rect contravention of the grants authorized by a previous proclamation of the King. By this latter mentioned, but earlier issued proclamation, officers and soldiers were granted lands as follows: Every person hav- ing the rank of a field officer, 5,000 acres; every captain, 3.000 acres; every subaltern or staff officer, 2,000 acres; every non-commissioned officer, 200 acres, and every private fifty acres. These officers and sol- diers, with scrip and military warrants in their hands, were constantly employed in selecting and locating their claims. These continued en- croachments kept the Indian tribes 7m a state OL dissatisfaction andSSS = ES. os : SS OE Oe eae bs sangnetsesieeeenelstineisinertnsheteiemanasenansisnengmemmmnenneieHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 125 derson purchase they succeeded in securing a deed of conveyance to Charles Robertson of a large extent of country. It was made March 19, 1775, and is recorded in the register’s office of Washington County. This deed was signed by Oconostota, Attakullakulla, Tenassee War- rior and Willinawaugh in presence of John Sevier, William Bailey Smith, Jesse Benton, Tillman Dixon, William Blevins and hom as Price, and conveyed for the sum of £2,000 lawful money of Great Britain, all that tract of land, including all the waters of the Watauga, part of the waters of Holston and the head branches of New Riven or Great Kanawha. These lands were afterward regularly patented to the settlers, the first patentee being Joshua Haug] ton. But itis proper here to refer to a deed to Jacob Brown by which for the consideration of 10 shillings, a “principality” was conveyed to him embracing much of the best land in Washington and Greene Counties. This deed was dated Mareh 25, 1775. At this time the colonial government claimed the exclusive right to purchase lands of the Indians as one of the prerogatives of sovereignty, and Gov. Martin pronounced the purchase, at Watauga, of the Cher- okee lands illegal, alleging in his proclamation against it that it was made in violation of the king’s proclamation of October 7, 1763, the effect of which proclamation has been already described as a brutwm fulmen. This proclamation of Gov. Martin was equally harmless. The Watauga settlement constantly increased in numbers, and the tribunal consisting. of five commissioners chosen by themselves settled all controversies arising among the people. Its sessions were held at regular intervals, and its business increased with the growth of the colony. No records of this court have been discovered, but while searching among the public papers of North Carolina, Dr. Ramsey found a petition from the Watauga settlement praying to be annexed to North Carolina as a county, as a district, or as some other division. This petition is without a date, and is in the hand-writing of John Sevier. The chairman of the meeting which adopted it was John Carter, whose grandson was chairman of the Constitutional Convention of 1834. The petition was received by the general assembly of North Carolina, August 22, 1776, and was signed by 112 persons. T+ commences thus: “The humble petition of the inhabitants of Washington District, including the River Wataugah, Nonachuckie, etc., in committee assembled, humbly sheweth, Ctew he committee who drew up this petition were as follows: John Carter, chairman; Charles Robertson, James Robertson, Zachariah Isbell, John Sevier, James Smith, Jacob Brown, William Bean, John Jones, George Russell, Jacob Womack and Robert Lucas. The name Washington Dis- 8126 HISTORY OF ENNESSEE. trict is believed to have been suggested by John Sevier, and thus the pioneers of Tennessee were probably the first to honor Washington. “nC lalifax. Nove or 1 tae Provincial Congress convened at Halifax, November 12, 1776, the oaae From ‘ Washington Dis- and continued in session until December 13. trict, Watauga Settlement,” were present John Carter, Charles Robert- son, John Haile and John Sevier: Jacob Womack was elected, but did nolattend: A bill of rights and a State constitution were adopted, in the former of which the limits of the State are made to extend westward “so far as is mentioned in the charter of King Charles the Second, to The following clause is also in the the late proprietors of Carolina. Declaration of Rights, “That it shall not be construed so as to prevent the establishment of one or more governments westward of this State, by consent of the Legislature.’ While these events were in progress, other events were either tran- spiring or in embryo, which were of transcendent importance to the three centers of settlement—at Carter’s at Watauga, and at Brown’s. Difficulties between Great Britain and her American colonies had already eommenced, the dawn of the American Reyolution was at hand. LHvyery means was to be employed by the mother country in reducing to submis- sion her refractory subjects, one of those measures being to arm the neighboring Indian tribes and to stimulate them to fall upon and destroy the feeble settlements on the frontier. The war with the Cherokees having happily come to an end, and t > prosperity having returned to the settlements, a treaty was made with them, and signed July 20, 1777. In April of that year the Legislature of North Carolina passed an act for the purpose of encouraging the militia and volunteers in prosecuting the war against the Cherokees. At the same session an act was passed establishing Washington Dis- trict, appointing justices of the peace, and establishing courts of pleas and quarter sessions. In November following, Washington County was created, to which was assigned the entire territory of the present State of Tennessee. A land office was provided for in Washington County, and each head of a family was permitted to take up for himself 640 acres of land, for his wife 100 acres, and 100 acres for each of his children. The a SS ee a 3 ‘ ras ae ease and small expense with which land entries could be made, led numerous poor men westward, for without a dollar in his pocket the eT ct ET immigrant, upon arriving at the distant frontier, and upon selecting a homestead, at once became a large land-owner, and almost instantaneously ery ee. tS if wes i ‘4 oa 4 ap ea if i i) ah ey ii) 4 i mii! 1 y } ‘ ial i} | oula re nel ee if i ; eat): re | i thie | 4 | : Hat im i wt 4 ei LS a4 \ } ge: A ‘i a ‘ aii j tae : hd ey ‘es F \ ieee i fi {IBD Ae ing eee es Bint f | nen 4 j » i by i i aH Pha es i ‘ te at} ‘ 2 f thd hae fm ff rae : is ' aa ie | | , i fa) i] ies ’ a4 | * i j ¥ Bo Baty : i | f | ihe a } ia I Z is eet ie ql i | | i is Soe "4 + eu ; ie hs ; ; ee M Pe i elke Fi it i ‘ i it . - | | bi? \ if Re Re : fei f rote ik eit} i" 1 tN 1 rei { bi felt 4 oy t ; } | 4 . i } } | re) : on itil tl m ii : ew ie ‘ | } ih | te 5 ; ' ¥ hae ae 4 4) 5 f : f Pil ire . | i . i | yet "i | y i tity ; ' ieee ni i eh i ' ; i ii { e ‘| i bel } Ve i ; ; it ‘ . | | 7 t : IF j i , ; { i my / ; } . ai { : P | fi i \ Rey hk y * it hE i ; i + wl ; : a ay et | { it Pap Uf ( uit i a ' a Bt ; . uel Bit f ‘y i { : Bi ‘ a i S ih ig 4 y i a ; { ant { ga q e ; et aE 1 } (Peary , bh ff vi ti } yf ‘ ' hh j tk f grey YF ie: t : : f ; (e | | j a : ie : : } ; ia rae } ; i f { i i © ish i ie iit fi SALE sie ii j | i bai} 1 ' ' ; j , } thes { } fi i | Ve oy we j i j ener OR ig en So clk eet =o acquired a competency and an independency for himself and his family. = -_ et ee ee These men brought no wealth, but they did bring what was of more 2 LEAT ES DARI Se EA I I ce mim ———————————— ——— value—industry, frugality, hardihood, courage, economy and self-reli-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. : 127 a ance—and of such material was the foundation of society in the future great State of Tennessee composed. During this year a road was laid out and marked from the court house in Washington County to the county of Burke; and the first house covered with shingles was put up a fow miles east of where Jonesboro now stands. In 1778 the Warm Springs on the French Broad were accidentally discovered by Henry Reynolds and Thomas Morgan. : By the treaty made at Watauga in March, 1775, which has been al- ready alluded to, the Cherokees deeded to Henderson & Co. all the lands between the Kentucky and Cumberland Rivers. A portion of this pur- chase was within the supposed boundary of North Carolina, and numbers of explorers continued to pass through Cumberland Gap on their way to Middle Tennessee. Among them Mansker renewed his visits in Novem- ber, 1775, and accompanied by Bryant and others encamped at Mansker Lick. Mansker and three others remained hunting and trapping on the Sulphur Fork of Red River. Thomas Sharp, Holliday, Spencer and others came in 1776 to the Cumberland and built a number of cabins. The rest returning, Spencer and Holliday remained until 1779. Capt. De Munbreun came to Middle Tennessee about 1775 and established his residence at Eaton’s Station. He hunted through Montgomery County, and during the summer of 1777 he saw some parties at Deacon’s Pond, near the present site of Palmyra. In 1778 a settlement was formed near Bledsoe’s Lick in the heart of the Chickasaw Nation, and about the same time a party of French erected a trading post at “The Bluff,” with the approval of the Chickasaws. Other parties kept coming to the lower Cumberland. Richard Hogan, Spencer, Holliday and others were there, and in the spring of 1778 they planted a small field of corn, the first plantation in Middle Tennessee. A large hollow tree stood near Bled- soe’s Lick in which Spencer lived. Holliday, becoming dissatisfied, was determined to leave the country, and Spencer, unable to dissuade him from his purpose, accompanied him to the barrens of Kentucky, breaking and giving to Holliday one half of his own knife, and returned to his hollow tree, where he spent the remainder of the winter. Spencer was a very large man, and one morning, haying passed the cabin occupied by one of De Munbreun’s hunters, and left his immense tracks in the rich alluvial soil, which were discovered by the hunter on his return, the hun- ter became aftrighted, immediately swam the Cumberland and wandered through the woods until he reached the French settlements on the Wa- bash. In 1779 there was nothing in the valley of the lower Cumberland, except the hunter’s camp and the lonely log habitation of Spencer. But rt = — il ia SS nar me nT ee neers ageaa ae ON ee Soo Si -. et FSS = pape a ¥ ~ OE Mastin a : , . i &, 7 (tae tb eet } a ‘ iB : rh ie: : mia’ Wan he i emit eine 6 6«6Pee F Tal gs [aes 4 ‘a an a Yat rae f be e 7 hy ' | oi 1 oy & 4S ae : ee < ' rei a at | ae | ¥ & ae . é i ha oe 5 yd Es ante rane Hee a SRE 4 iit E pete | Ge : oe 4 i dst | 1 i : ' 4 i : t > t ree Fi ie | t | : iPS i 5 { 34 t Oey - OE Hg ; 4 Hie i ist he bite @ | 2 i egy! e Se pi ee 4 ns ne f rae ein t hy re ‘ ey x ge tig +B i. eae k rey * aie ) ; meth ae 1 i ioe % iit ~ | } t i ei @ \% bi Be ie é yf " t. it f : } | bea o t feos os Pat ; } § ry | , : | t | ' ; | 7 ‘ : us| \ ; F 4 ' | ay 7 ; . : ; t : we it | } ; fe e 4 | iq ; tt tl ie een Weil j ,e eT aiealt whit Hi ; i} | ; i i j 1 i} } ‘ } ie al ti | ih} ; Pike es Ba | Tei ithe $ ny J ‘ : i ; a | ae add PATE] eet \ } if | ia ie hal a ae ' Pil ast as) Hite ig i j \ ft { | ar ti ff} } 4 ; + si { Ri 1 i t i Vi He | r I i ie)" ) ee i a lana aera ame Santen eunnens ————— Senet eeeneneenteenconenerenc so gyenrneneere es “Wosebagppanaiaesashaie Son Sa a Sogeeseatn terpenes bodies, keeping pace with us until the Cumberland Mountain withdrew them from our sight, when we were in hopes we had escaped them. We were now arrived at the place called the Whirl or Suck, where the river is compressed within less than half its common width above, by the Cumber- land Mountain, which juts in on both sides. In passing through the upper part of these narrows, at a place described by Coody, which he termed the “Boiling Pot,” a trivial accident had nearly ruined the expedition. One of the company, John Cotton, who was moving down in a large canoe, had attached it to Robert Cartwright’s boat, into which he and his family had gone for safety. The canoe was here overturned and the little cargo lost. The company, pitying his distress, concluded to halt and assist him in recovering his property. They had landed on the northern shore at a level spot, and were going up to the place, when the Indians, to our astonishment, appeared immediately over us on the oppo- site cliffs. and commenced firing down upon us, which occasioned a precipitate retreat to the boats. We immediately moved off; the Indians lining the bluffs along continued their fire from the heights on our boats below, without doing any other injury than wounding four slightly. Jennings’ boat was missing. “Wo have now passed through the Whi. The river widens with a placid and gentle current, and all the company appear to be in satety except the family of Jonathan Jennings, whose boat ran on a large rock projecting out from the northern shore, and was partly immersed in water at the Whirl, where we were compelled to leave them, Continued to sail * * * immediately perhaps to be slaughtered by their merciless enemies. on that day and floated throughout the following night. “ Priday 10th.—This morning about 4 o'clock we were sur] > ot some distance in the rear. He rised by the cries of “help. poor Jennings had discovered us by our fires, and can tion. He states that as soon as the Indians disc turned their whole attention to him, and kept up a most ¢ 16 up in the most wretched cond1- overed his situation they alling fi7d 2ta a ie iia le pee TUTTE ——— WineaiG (fll LTTE 32 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. his boat. He ordered his wife, a son nearly grown, a young man who accompanied them, and lis negro man and woman, to throw all his goods into the river, to lighten their boat for the purpose of getting her off, himself returning their fire as well as he could, being a good soldier and an expert marksman. But before they had accomplished their object his son, the young man, and the negro, jumped out of the boat and left them. Mr. Jennings, however, and the negro woman succeeded in unloading the boat, but chiefly through the efforts of Mrs. Jennings, who got out of the boat and shov ed her off, but was near falling a victim to her own intrepidity on account of the boat starting so suddenly as soon as loosened from the rock. Upon examination he appears to have made a wonderful escape, for his boat is: pierced in numberless places with It is to be remarked that Mrs. Peyton, who was the night before hich was unfortunately killed upon the hurry bullets. delivered of an infant, w and confusion consequent upon such a disaster, assisted them, being frequently exposed to wet and cold then and afterward, and that her health appears to be good at this time and I think and | hope she will do Their clothes were much cut with bullets especially Mrs. Jen- * + s + * * * well. nings. “Sunday 12th.—Set out, and after a few hours’ sailing heard the crowing of cocks and soon came within view of the town: here they fired on us again without doing any injury. * After running until about 10 o’clock came in sight of the Muscle Shoals. Halted on the northern shore at the appearance of the shoals. to search for the signs Capt. James Robertson was to make for us at that place. He set out from Holston early in the fall of 1779, was to proceed by the way of Kentucky to the Big Salt Lick on Cumberland River. with several others in company, was to come across from the Big Salt Lick to the upper end of the shoals, there to make such slons that we might know he had been there and that it was practicable for us to go across by land. But to our great mortification we ean find none—from which we conclude that it would not be prudent to make the attempt, and are determined, knowing ourselves to be in such imminent danger, to pursue our journey down the river. After trimming our boats in the best manner possible we ran through the shoals before night. * * * Our boats frequently drag ged on the bottom: * * or they warped as much as in a rouch sea. But by the hand of Providence we are preserved from this danger also. I know not the length of this wonderful shoal; it had been re presented to me to be tw enty-five or thirty miles. If so we must have descended ver y rapidly, as indeed we did. for we passed it in about three hours. * * * * * *HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 133 ” ednesday 15th.—Got under way and moved on peaceably the five following days, when we arrived at the mouth of the Tennessee on Mon- day, the 20th, and landed on the lower point immediately on the bank of the Ohio. Our situation here is truly disagreeable. The river is very high and the current rapid, our boats not constructed for the purpose of stemming a rapid stream, our provisions exhausted, the crews almost worn down with hunger and fatigue, and we know not what distance we have to go, or what time it will take us to reach our place of destination. The scene is rendered still more melancholy,as several boats will not attempt to ascend the rapid current. Some intend to descend the Mississippi to Natchez. others are bound for the Illinois—among the rest my son-in-law and daughter. We now part perhaps to meet no more, for L am deter- mined to pursue my course, happen what will. ‘“ Priday 24th.—About 3 o’clock came to the mouth of a river which _ ey ce ‘ sli ~ a - I thought was the Cumberland. Some of the company declared 1t could not be—it was so much smaller than was expected. But I never heard of any river running in between the Cumberland and Tennessee. We determined, however, to make the trial, pushed up some distance and encamped for the night. “ Saturday, 25th.—To-day we are much encouraged. The river grows wider; the current 1s g # * * * * entle and we are now convineed it is the Cumberland. * * “Friday, 31st.—Set out this day, and after running some distance met with Col. Richard Henderson, who was running the line between Virginia and North Carolina. At this meeting we were much rejoiced. , Camped at night near the mouth of a little river, at which place and below a handsome bottom of rich land. Here we found a pair of grinding, but appearing not to have been KOK there 1s hewed mill-stones, set up for used for a long time. ‘“Proceeded on quietly until the to the mouth of a little river running in on the froe and his company, called Red River, upon whic Here they took leave of us. We proceeded up the Cumberland, nothing happening material until the 23d, when we reached the first settlement on the north side of the river, one mile and a half below the Big Salt Lick, and called Eaton’s Station, after a man of that name, who with several came through Kentucky and settled there. his day we arrived at our journey’s end, at asure of finding Capt. Robertson us to be enabled to re intrusted 12th of April, at which time we came north side, by Moses Ren- h they intended to settle. other families “Monday, April 9Ath.—T the Big Salt Lick, where we have the ple It is a source of satisfaction to and his company. amilies and friends, who we restore to him and others their fSA EERE, Rg eee —— in LE ae Seer SLE as ae 1 ai. nn es aad e ee eae q a pecan ie . 1 eet tee FR NE So A Rg ties Mena am cee “e Tae eet TR er SSK, FTE Re a POM NAT es Tiana eamtinbme. team cone are ee 134 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. to our care,and who some time since,.perhaps, they despaired of ever meeting again. Though our prospects at present are dreary, we have found a few log cabins, which have been built on a cedar bluff above the Lick by Capt. Robertson and his company. | This journal here presented may be found in full in LR TUHISE) In copying out of his work, unimportant portions have been omitted for une sake of saving space. This emigration of Col. Donelson banics as one of the most remarkable achievements in the settlement of the West, and as the names of the participators in the expedition have far more than a local interest, they are here inserted: John Donelson, Sr., Thomas Hutch- eReonn Caffrey, John Donelson, Jr., Mrs. James Robertson and five children Mrs. Purnell, M. Rounsifer, Tatios Cain, Isaac Neelly, Jona- than Jennings, Benjamin Belew, Peter Looney, Capt. John Blackmore. Moses Renfroe, William Crutchfield, James White Hugh Henry, Sr., Benjamin Porter, Mrs. Mary Henry (widow), Frank Armstrong, Hugh Rogan, Daniel Chambers, Robert Cartwright, Mr. Stuart, David Gwinn. John Boyd, Reuben Harrison, Frank Haney, Mr. Maxwell, John Mont- gomery, John Cotton, Thomas Henry, John Cockrell, John White, Sol- omon White and Mr. Payne. The above list of names is copied from Putnam. Ramsey gives these additional ones: Isaac Lanier. Daniel Dunham, Joseph and James Renfroe, Solomon Turpin and John Gibson. There were other persons, men, women and children, whose names have not been preserved. The total number of persons in this expedition is not known, but from the best information obtainable there were at least thirty boats in the entire fleet, no one of which contained less than two families. With reference to the fate of the three young men who ran away from Mr. Jennings, when his boat was attacked. as narrated in Capt. Donel- son’s journal, authorities are not agreed. Ramsey and John Carr acree in stating that the negro man was drowned, and that the young man, whose nameis not given, was taken to Chic ‘kamauga Town, where he was killed and burned, and that young Jennings was ransomed by an Indian trader named Rogers, and afterward restored to his parents. Putnam, however, doubts the correctness of this narration. especially so far as it refers to the burn- ing of the young man. He says ‘such cruelty and crime have not been clearly proven against them (the Indians).” But as both Ramse xy and Carr say “they killed and burned the young man,” itmay justly be inferred that the ‘burning occurred after the killing,” or, in other words. they killed and then burned the body of the young man, and thus the “cruelty and crime” would consist in the killing and not in the burning. The capture of Stuart’s boat and crew, amons. whom were the several ae , epi Fa 5 a we eae "HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 35 ases of small-pox, as narrated in Capt. Donelson’s journal, resulted in : : ate great mortality among the Indians, many of whom were attacked by the disease with fatal results. It is said that when attacked and when the fever was upon them they took a “heavy sweat” in their houses, and then : . ane ive IAP) A oh leaped into the river, the remedy being no less fatal than the disease itself. Putnam quotes approvingly from the “narrative of Col. Joseph Brown.” that this mortality was “a judgment upon the Indians ” though . : a a oD it can have been a judgment upon the Indians, any more than it just how and killing of so many of Stuart’s family was a judgment and the capture on them, is not easily discernible. CHAPTER V. SETTLEMENT CONCLUDED—IESULTS OF DONELSON’S VOYAGE—THE FRENCH LICK —THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MANY BLOCK-HOUSES, STATIONS, EtTc.—THE LONG REIGN OF TRYING TIMES—THE MILITARY WARRANTS AND GRANTS—PIONEER CusTOMS—GOVERNMENT OF THE CUMBERLAND COLONY—THE EMIGRANT Roap—CoL. BRown’s DISASTROUS VoYAGE—NORTH CAROLINA'S NEGLECT OF THE COLONIES—THEIR ISOLATION AND SUFFERING—THE TENNESSEE LAND COMPANY—N ATIONAL EXECUTIVE INTERFERENCE—DESIGNS OF THE COMPA- NIES THWARTED BY THE EFFECTIVE ACTS OF THE CITIZENS OF GEORGIA-- SUMMARY OF TENNESSEE LAND GRANTS—THE WESTERN PURCHASE—THE CHICKASAWS—ENTRY OF THE WHITES INTO WEST TENNESSEE—THE BLUFFS— PERMANENT SETTLEMENT—INCIDENTS AND ANECDOTES. fae principal results of the emigration of Col. Donelsonto Middle Ten- nessee were the establishment of the settlements at and near the lependent government May ation of. the State of Frank- adjoining for- Bluff and the subsequent formation of an 1n¢ 1, 1780, a number of years before the organiz lin. Some of these early settlers plunged at once into the ests. Col. Donelson himself, with his family, being one of the number. He went up the Cumberland, and erected a small fort at a place since ealled Clover Bottom, near Stone River, and on the south side of that he boundary Walker, Virginia’s commissioner for running t and North Carolina, arrived at the Bluff, accom- and his two brothers, Nathaniel and stream. Dr. liné between that State panied by Col. Richard Henderson Pleasant. Col. Henderson erected a station on Stone River, remained there some time, and sold lands under the deed made to himself and part- ners at Watauga in March, 1775, by the Gherokees. The price charged for this land by Col. Henderson was $10 per 1,000 acres. The certifi- lause by which it was set forth that pay- eate of purchase contained a ¢ the confirmation of the Henderson ment for the land was eonditioned on rc OEE a eee nae aera ons = rabies Sane einioeTUNER TEs aE rn ape rer Bev, ‘a. ro anaes: sieket adi * ay eta Sata adie sie’ Pe rE a i i Pe bi Pee nae i 8 Wen ej l {s al i lid Pa a i Vie . Ae (E@ Bilan if ike aa Me aa P PE ce | Pia B Rien Re ie Y Ht i VER, t ; ig th Bo ab al | ; ee te Re ee oy 1m Bei me Oe idea i fé i La: ~ AE Bei ain if i} yt : iH I HH me tal rae Rt aa ey ein tie ee laa 1 t i} CT aa B ROE ea i eae | l | BL} a i i hI pi tee Pe ri Sane . FREES e | abi Me ay ni bite PEA 1 Raat aa aaa AE Adal yi i t vid F , it a a i} ; y | Lh ui | CR TR Re i" | fii i Re If | ii | See yt Ses Wie Bi ainsi ii ay i id i We | a) Pu le | mee i) | aa d= Pe Re HRI a OR Ht fF oe 4s Le ‘ 1 oe a PE |) a iti EM ec EPO ELI ILE 136 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. treaty by the proper authorities; but both the States of Virginia and North Carolina annulled his title, or rather declared it to be null and void ab initio, and refused to recognize the sales made by him or his com- pany, and purchasers on contracts made with him were never urged to make payment for their lands. But notwithstanding the fact that the two States decided that the Transylvania Company had not by the pur- chase acquired any title to the lands, on the ground that private individ- uals had no power or right to make treaties with Indian tribes, yet they at the same time decided that the Indians had divested themselves of their title to them, and hence Transylvania became divided between the two States of North Carolina and Virginia. But each State, on account of the expenditures of the company and the labor to which they had been and the interest manifested by them in the welfare of the early settlers, made to them a grant of 200,000 acres. The Virginia grant was on the Ohio River in what is now Henderson County, Ky., and the North Carolina grant was bounded as follows: ‘Beginning at the old Indian town in Powell’s Valley, running down Powell’s River not less than four miles in width on one or both sides thereof to the junction of Powell and Clinch Rivers; then down Clinch River on one or both sides not less than twelve miles in width for the aforesaid complement of 200,000 acres.” The remaining part of the land was devoted to public uses. The little band of immigrants at the Bluff were in the midst of a vast extent of country apparently uninhabited by Indians, Savage tribes were to be found in all directions, but toward the south none were known to be north of the Tennessee, and toward the north none were known to be south of the Ohio. ments were claimed by Creek or Cherokee, Chickasaw or Choctaw; hence Apparently no lands within or near the new settle- a sense of safety soon manifested itself among the pioneers, and hence, also, many of them began to erect cabins for individual homes in the wild woods, on the barrens or on the prairie where no pathway or trace of animal or human could be seen; and in their anxiety to make improye- ments on their individual claims and to become independent, many of the more thoughtless of them were reluctant to devote much of their time and labor to the erection of forts, stockades and palisades to which all could retreat for mutual defense in case of an attack by the now apparently harmless lords of the soil. But this desire, laudable though it was when not carried to the extreme of imprudence, was by the wise and experienced among them sufficently repressed to secure an agree- ment on the part of all to give a portion of their valuable time to the erection of a few forts and depositories for arms, ammunition and pro- visions.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ; Te os : eaok The fort at the Bluffs, called Nashbor ough, in honor of Francis Nash of North Carolina, a brigadier -general in the Continental Army, was to be the principal fort and headquarters for all. The others were as fol- lows: Freeland’s, at the spring in North Nashville; Katon’s, upon the east side of the river upon the first high land at the river bank; Gasper’s, about ten miles north at the sulphur spring where now stands the town A <7 " a wc Ni as AN i i ie = of Goodlettsville; Asher's, on Station Camp Creek, on the bluff, about three miles from Gallatin; Bledsoe’s, near the sulphur spring about seven miles from Gallatin ; Donelson’s, on the Clover Bottom where the pike passes, and Fort. Union, at the bend of the river above the Bluffs, where since has stood the town of Haysborough. ‘The fort at Nashborough stood upon the bluff between the southeast corner of the public square ‘ . ° * ! . . and Spring Street. Like the other forts it was a two-story log building with port holes and lookout station. Other log houses were near it and palisades were thrown entirely around the whole, the upper ends of the palisades or pickets being sharpened. There was one large entrance to the enclosure. The view toward the west and southwest was obstructed by a thick forest of cedars and a dense undergrowth of privet bushes. The rich bottom lands were covered with cane measuring from ten to The ancient forest trees upon the rich lands in twenty feet in height. jestic growth ; all the elements of nature this region were of a most ma seem to haye combined to make them what they were, and yet, although many of the loveliest sites for country residences have been hastily and unwisely stripped of their chief ornament and charm, and civilized man has speedily destroyed, by th forest as a thousand years may no and there some lovely spots and glorious 0a abased by the woodman’s ax. ‘There are a f native woods and magnificent trees remaining in the vicinity of the capli- ousands in a year, such monarchs of the { again produce, there remain here ks not wholly dishonored or ew, and but a few, of such tal of Tennessee. 279% As has been stated above the winter of 1779-80 was River being frozen over sufficiently solid to per- The inclemency of the unusually severe, the Cumberland mit Robertson’s party to cross upon the ice. at inconvenience and suffering to the arm in their cabins, necessat- 1d the game upon which they depended in part for food was in an impoverished condition and poor. But while these evils resulted from this cause, there were also benefits enjoyed uncon- sciously to the settlers themselves. The Indians were themselves in as unsatisfactory condition, and as unprepared to make an attack upon the weather was such as to cause gre early settlers. It was impossible to keep w ily loosely constructed, al *Putnam.CAT Wage, ea AR aon NS Saree Gag ape SO al ER ri a 4 ee E Feat PCIe ee - if ane = inn — aoe EE ee uae —,- . a : - neliientetree me _ FETT ? ay yates - . — sre boner 7 = re 4 ‘ - en = aa yom ~ _— sae? ae a ; RET: Vai CT a Papa ra ST ne ase a - TTS 2. = ne =f . - . = i Saiags - ~ ~- mr ah Shc et § ~~ - ~ — — = te a feakaniena aan neccee econ an Tie Fee S - Sor is - —— apd ies z Ler a peimee Te ae ‘ ~ peat sl 4 eS - ~~ - — Be Spe —— s —— ~ r 7 - Ss ies “ a pateD 3 = es = we = inci ing _ * or = nee ahi ” nana EREnamEDE th, rh a 7 ‘ - ne coe yee RE ge _ -% a ee 7 shi - TEN Se eS a ~ = “ os i : i. NSP pe eee ees ————— 138 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. cabins as the people in the cabins were to ee a ee selves against an attack; and during this interim of security , aaa sion by the savage tribes, which lasted until some time in May, 1780, the forts and other defenses were erected and strengthened, and numerous acquisitions were made to the numbers of the whites. Ammigration had set in with a new impetus, the roads and traces to envuchey, and the Cumberland country being crowded with adventurers seeking independ- ence and fortune in the new Eldorado of the West, which was 1n verity beautiful, fertile and grand; and it is not at all surprising that its native proprietors should at length muster all their strength, their wildest ener- gies and fiercest passions, to dispossess the invaders and to repossess themselves of their own fair, delightful paradise. However, the attempt to accomplish this design soon convinced them that it could not be done by force of arms, the settlers being too strong, too resolute, and too well- defended; the only recourse therefore had was, if possible, to deprive the whites of food by driving away and dispersing the deer, buffalo and other wild game, which was commenced in the spring of 1780, and con- tinued with such success for two or three years as to necessitate adven- tures by the stationers to far-off distances, and thus expose themselves to the dangers of ambush and attack by the lurking savage. ‘This state of things rendered life at the Bluff and in the vicinity, anything but pleas- ant. Numbers wished they had never come, or that they had gone to other settlements where, being ignorant of the actual facts connected therewith, they imagined a greater degree of security and plenty reigned, But here, as in every community, there were a goodly number of brave- hearted men and women. who. haying suffered in getting to their homes, _ put their trust in Providence and resolved to Stay. One of the causes which led to the rapid settlement of Tennessee, was the passage, by the General Assembly of North Carolina, of an “act for the relief of the officers and soldiers in the Continental line, and for other purposes,” which was as follows:* WHEREAS, The officers and soldiers of the Continental line of this State have suffered much by the depreciation of paper currency, as well as by the deficiency of clothing and other supplies that have been due them according to sundry acts and resolves of the Gen- eral Assembly, and whereas, the honorable, the Continental] Congress, have resolved th the deficiency shall be made good to the 18th day of August, 17 depreciation established. And “ at 80, according to a scale of ae x % * * x * WHEREAS, It is proper that some effectual and for the signal bravery and persevering zeal of the service of the State. Therefore Be tt enacted, etc., That each Continental soldier of t in service, and continues to the end of the w permanent reward should be rendered Continental officers and soldiers in the he line of this State whois now ar, or such of them as from wounds or bodily *Laws of 1782. Chapter Ifl. eS =HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 139 red unfit for service, which shall be ascertained by a shall haye six hundred and forty acres of land; every officer who is now in service, and shall continue in service until the end of the war, as well as those officers who from wounds or bodily infirmity have left or may be obliged to leave the service, shall have a greater quantity according to his pay as followeth: Each one thousand acres; each subaltern, two-thousand five hundred thousand eight hundred and forty acres; each major, four thousand eight hundred acres; each lieutenant-colonel, five thousand seven hundred and sixty acres; each lieutenant-colonel commandant, seven thousand two hundred acres; each colonel, seven thousand two hundred acres; each brigadier-general, twelve thousand acres; cach chaplain, six thousand two hundred acres; each surgeon, four thousand eight hundred acres; each surgeon’s mate, two thousand five hundred and sixty acres; and where any officer or soldier has fallen or shall fall in the defense of his country, his heirs or assigns shall have the same quantity of land that the officer or soldier would have been entitled to had they served during the war. According to the next section of this on the tract of land set apart to be divided up among the officers and soldiers should be entitled to 640 acres, provided that no such grant should include any salt lick or salt spring which were reserved with 640 acres in connection with each lick or spring for public purposes. By the eighth section Absalom Tatom, Isaac Shelby and Anthony ted commissioners to lay off the land and they were infirmity have been or shall be rende certificate from the commanding officer, non-commissioned officer, andsixty acres; each captain, three act any family that had settled Bledsoe were appoin al by a guard of not more than 100 men. Nathaniel Greene was allowed 25,000 d in 1784 was described as follows: to be accompanie Bv the tenth section Gen. . acres of land, which by an act passe south bank of Duck River, on a sycamore, cherry tree a small branch, running thence along a line of and forty-eight poles, to a Spanish oak, east six miles and ninety poles, to and 300 poles, “Beginning on the and ash, at the mouth of marked trees south seven miles a hickory and a sugar sapling ; thence kberry tree; thence north three miles a Spanish oak and hac saplings into a clift of Duck to a sugar-tree sapling, and two white oak River, where it comes from the northeast; cording to its m sanderings to the beginning.” The Revolutionary war came to an end in Robertson anticipated this event and from it inferred Indian hostilities. It was soon followed by the arrival from North Caro- lina of quite a number of persons, who gave additional strength and en- couragement to the settlements. Early in 17838 the commissioners named above in the eighth section of the act for the relief of the officers and soldiers in the Continental line arrived from North Carolina accom- panied by a guard to lay off the lands promised as bounties to the officers and soldiers of said Continental line. ‘These commissioners also came to examine into the claims of those persons who considered themselves en- titled to pre-emption rights granted to settlers on the Cumberland pre- vious to 1780, and also to lay off the lands given to Gen. Greene. ‘The thence down Dueck River ac- November, 1782. Capt. an abatement ofee een eal Sern rnc enemipagt igen Bo aes > SEE wpe inns on ¢ ar eee = Ss seseseigu pusteietipneessiniecresesee. onetime saunisimeeenaaamees eee a eee x — ‘ it arg rents. ep " neaee et, ere ee em ii . _ ORT Re een SEN eo nN s £ aioe a eet 8 Sse aelireppemesorssenes essere poe on aaa an amna = a 140 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. settlers, animated with new hope by the presence of ali these additions to their numbers and strength, entirely abandoned the designs they had long entertained of leaving the country. - The commissioners and-guards, with some of the inhabitants in com- pany, went to the place since ealled Latitude Hill, on Elk River, to ascertain the thirty-fifth degree of north latitude, and there made obser- vations. They then went north to Duck River to the second creek be- low Columbia and laid off Greene’s 25,000 acres, and then fifty-five southern boundary of the State, and parallel thereto ran miles from the a line which received the name of the ‘‘Continental line,’ because it was the boundary of the territory allotted to the officers and soldiers of North Carolina in the Continental Army. But upon the representation, and at the request of the officers made to the General Assembly at the session of 1783, they directed it to be laid off from the northern boundary fifty - five miles to the south: Beginning on the Virginia line where the Cum- berland River intersects the same; thence south fifty-five miles; thence west to the Tennessee River; thence down the Tennessee River to Vir- ginia line; thence with the said Virginia line east to the beginning.* This line was run by Gen. Rutherford, in 1784, and named the “Com- missioner’s line.”” ‘The Continental line passed the Harpeth River about five miles above the town of Franklin. The Commissioner’s line in- cluded the land in the Great Bend of Tennessee—all Jands on the east side of the Tennessee to the present Kentucky line. The method of running it was as follows: Commencing: at the Kentucky line the com- missioners ran south fifty-five miles to Mount Pisgah, then forming them- selves into two parties, one party ran westward to the Tennesssee and the other eastward to the Caney Fork. T ; ae f ‘ Rte . ‘ A Never were more generous bounties given to more deserving patriots. The war-worn yeteran might here secure a competency, or perhaps even wealth or affluence to himself and children after the storm of battle had subsided, in the enjoyment of which he might pass the evening of life, serenely contemplating the great benefits derived and to be derived from the sacrifices himself and his compatriots had made in the establishment of the independence of the American nation. A vast emigration from North Carolina was the direct result of her generous action, insomuch that it was at one time estimated that nine-tenths of the population of f ee ; % . aie. ZA Ni . ee Z Tennessee were from the mother State. And in addition to the bounties offered to the officers and soldiers of the Continental line, other bounties were offered to the guards of the commissioners who were appointed to lay off the reservation for the said officers and soldiers. These bountiesHAA vv S 4Oe I Gt L . r, HTSSHNN v TV LIdGSOH 4 WoO LHL > “ r “AN VSNI “CaHSINIAND Hee ace | LL SS i | i mm / | HLL MAL Wh | ———————— —————— MELT = = = = — =} = = = = —— ——= = =f | >= = = = AI | WELL LE LEE AAT MM il LLL TTT NOHNG Ss oe SAT ike ADRESS PREM CAD | a : an ur a FERNS NS SENS DEAN a ener oe =Pie \ } \ i i a a ge A ER TI Sl Aen ag tT rer aeracgs open a *HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 141 were named “Guard Rights,” and induced numerous individuals to be- come members of the guard, and numerous grants were located and set- tled upon by such individuals. After running the line as authorized by the General Assembly of North Carolina, the commissioners sat at the Bluff to examine into pre-emption claims and issued certificates to such as were entitled thereto. The commission then dissolved and Isaac Shelby removed to Kentucky, thus ceasing to be a citizen of Tennessee. Of Kentucky he became the first governor, and died suddenly July 18, 1826, in the seventy-sixth year of his age. The commissioners having come and gone affairs again assumed their usual aspect at the Bluff. The people were employed in their ordinary labors, doing what could be done to improve their condition. Additions to their numbers continued to be made from North Carolina, and they were gratified to learn that even much larger numbers were added to the settlements in Kentucky. Goods began to be brought in by boats from the Ohio and its tributaries, but according to Putnam the first store at the Falls of the Ohio was supplied from Philadelphia, and the supplies carried on pack-horses. The second store was kept at Lexington by Col. (afterward Gen.) James Wilkinson, from which small supplies were pur- chased for the settlers on the Cumberland. Several years after this a small store was opened at the Bluff. Lardner Clark was the first mer- chant and ordinary-keeper, dealing in dry goods, thimbles and pins for ladies; dinners and liquors for men, and provender for horses. As one of the improvements made in that early day in the way of labor-saving machinery, it may not be inappropriate to introduce here a description of a hominy-mill invented and constructed by a Mr: Cartwright. It con- sisted mainly of a wheel, upon the rim of which he fastened a number of cows’ horns, in such position that as each horn was filled with water its weight would cause it to descend and thus set the wheel in revolution. To the axle of this wheel was attached a crank, and to the crank the apparatus for cracking the corn. Thus many a little blow was made by the little pestle upon the quart of corn in the mortar. This mill was owned by Heyden and James Wells. As to the general condition of affairs on the Cumberland the follow-. ing description from Ramsey is probably as graphic and correct as can be composed: ‘As on the Watauga at its first settlement, so now here the colonists of Robertson were without any regularly organized government. The country was within the boundaries of Washington County, which extended to the Mississippi, perhaps the largest extent of territory ever embraced in a single county. But even here in the wilds of the Cum- berland, removed more than 600 miles from their seat of government, the 9 nes = a — astan Umma ee 2 Re Eee Oe ee SS a Beira telaecse Satay Ry ception > gen ne gee == For three days and nights they did not land. but doubled on their oars, beating to the south side at night and to the middle of the river by day.* Arriving at the Muscle Shoals Cox and his party built a block-house and other works of defense on an ‘sland. The Glass with about sixty Indians shortly afterward appeared, and informed the intruders that if they did not peacefully withdraw he would put them to death. Upon considering their defenseless condition as against a much superior force, they abandoned their works, which the Indians immediately reduced to ashes. Returning to Knoxville Cox and his associates were arrested upon a warrant by Judge Campbell to answer for their offense, but the indictments, two of which were sent tothe grand jury, were not sustained as true bills. Thus Cox and his twenty young men from Georgia seemed to triumph over the Government, and were thereby encouraged to perse- vere in their attempt to settle at the Muscle Shoals. They soon found purchasers for many thousands of acres of land and made public declar- ation of their intention to make another attempt at settlement, and that they would do so with a great force drawn from Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. The time fixed upon for this grand movement was November, 1791, or as soon thereafter as their numbers could be collected. This movement, however, appears to have failed, and the failure was probably on account of the company’s failure to comply with the terms of their purchase of the lands from Georgia. For two or three years the matter remained in abeyance, but in 1794 the Legislature of Geor ola passed another bill for the sale of the lands *Ramsey.iim A i LP EL ITIL P< er. f ee eran - cr ry sl 7 ta : a UV TL ULERY aD Rrra aa =< nesn_cTheseeet antes pent entree nei itn Se) ES SE ERY tS eh RD NE ele ag hn h = es wie SPB ERT Te Pt en So ee op ET eae eS + erie 150 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. which was vetoed by the Governor in December of that year. In Janu- ary, 1795,a bill was passed which received the Governor’s signature and became a law. Under this law an aggregate of 35,000,000 acres of land was sold to four companies, very nearly in proportion to the amounts paid by each company. The Georgia Company paid $250,000, the Georgia-Mississippi Company paid $155,000, the Upper Mississippi Company paid $35,000 and the Tennessee Land Company paid $60,000, the latter company receiving the same amount as under the first purchase. in 1789. In August, 1795, a report was circulated that Cox and his. associates intended making another attempt at the establishment of a. settlement on the lands purchased from Georgia, and Goy. Blount recom- mended a regular military force to prevent them. In January, 1796, some individuals arrived from Georgia for the purpose of making a pas- sage to the Muscle Shoals with the view of keeping possession there until a settlement could be established by the Tennessee Company. They gave out, however, that they were going to Natchez, and it was some time before the Governor could learn their true designs. On the 18th of February, 1796, he wrote a letter.to the chiefs of Cherokees, informing them that about four weeks before that time a boat with many men had left Knoxville, ostensibly for Natchez, but really for the Muscle Shoals with the view of settling on the Great Bend of the Tennessee. and gave assurance to the chiefs that if such were the fact the United States would remove the intruders and that they, the Cherokees, need not be uneasy. But the settlement under all of these purchases was effectually pre- vented by the action of the State of Georgia with reference to the sale of the lands, which is in itself a curious and interesting study. The entire populace of that State became intensely excited and most highly inflamed against the Legislature for selling the lands, and in 1796 the act by which the sale was made was repealed by a new Legislature elected for the purpose, by an overwhelming vote, on the ground of unconstitutionality and fraud, and the enrolled bill. passed January 7, 1795, was publicly and solemnly burned February 13, 1796, together with such portions of the records as could be destroyed without destroy- ing other and valuable portions. And it is matter of tradition that the fire was kindled by means of a sun glass, upon the theory that the infamy sought to be cast upon the fair fame of the State could only appropriately be obliterated by fire brought down from heaven. The following table shows the various land grants or appropriations by the State of North Carolina, within her western territory, now the State of Tennessee: weHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 151 Acres. Acres. Granted to claimants in the counties of Washington, Sullivan, Greene and Hawkins............-.. 879,262 Granted to claimants in the Eastern, Middle and Wes- Rina GhEINSTORL onon 5 0050nC Se ep 1,271,280 . > *- *-* + »~ >~ : 2,150,542 Granted to the settlers on the Cumberland pre-emp- FIOM ce Beenie ast oe oo 309,760 Granted to Maj.-Gen. Nathaniel Greene..........- 25,000 Granted to the officers and soldiers in the Continen- 1,239,498 PaleLiNG wee eee ie eeelelect eet Granted to ditto for which warrants had been granted, but for which grants had not been 1,594,726 2,834, 224 Granted to the surveyor of the military lands for his services. ..... ee ee we 30,208 Granted to the commissioners, surveyors, officers and guards, for ascertaining the bounds of the mil- 65,932 5,415,661 itary lands.......-----:--- Total number of acreS........-.--+-- +++) -eee8 The above statement was certified by J. Glasgow, secretary of state for North Carolina, July 30, 1791, and by Alexander Martin, governor, August 10, of the same year. Settlement of West Tennessee.—That portion west of the Tennessee River was not settled—was not opened for settle- ment—until long after Tennessee became a flourishing and wealthy State. The lands in this section were owned and occupied by the Chickasaw tribe of Indians as far back as there is any authentic record. Their firm friendship for the whites, particularly the English, was something rather remarkable. They were first met by De Soto in his tour of conquest in 1540, a little above the southern boundary of the State, by whom he was treated with remarkable courtesy until he demanded of them 900 of their He had spent the winter at their village, from them, but on this demand they They preferred desolated homes Whether De Soto and his band of Tennessee lying number to carry his baggage. Chisca, and received many courtesies burned their village and flew to arms. and death to anything like slavery. ehed within the boundaries of this State is questioned. The next the first, was the Jesuit missionary, Marquette, who State in 1673, but his voyage down the river tlement. He found mar white man, possibly visited the borders of the ition and discovery rather than set est armed with the weapons of civili along the Atlantic coast. he south, in concert was one of exploré the dusky men of the for which they had doubtless obtained from traders In 1736 an attempt was made by Bienville from t zed wartare,oa Sa aus a see SRR eee ee Se - owns z . Soe rn ~~ = mtb ehin=plncens — ~ ek ne ERNE Ciencia meres - ss oa aa ‘ —_ ne - v =_— aS i oni ee ar Sia: Oba aun a RNa gs to SPR iy SRO ck CGA ntonaeee Swhaee eR enemies sgunieesngsn-onusinapesttins ap emuroe-oe 152 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. with D’Artaguette and Vinsenné from the north, to dispossess the Chick- asaws of their lands. The attempt was a disastrous failure, the two forces not acting simultaneously; the former was compelled to beat a hasty re- treat, and the latter two were captured and burned at the stake: In #39 the French again attempted to possess themselves of the territory of the Chickasaws; this time they made an attack upon the Indians at Chicka- saw Bluffs (at Memphis), but were defeated with loss. The attempt was renewed at the same place in 1740 by Bienville and De Noailles, who ascended the river in boats. ‘They met with little success but managed to patch up a hollow treaty. A fort was built by them at Chickasaw* Bluff, called Prud’homme, but the date is unknown. Desultory fighting was kept up between them for the possession of this territory LOr ten years longer. In nearly all the wars of the United States and while the colonies were under control of the English Government, these Indians sided with and assisted the English. In consequence of which they received very liberal boundaries at the treaty of Hopewell, after the Rey- olutionary ar Besides lands the Government courted their friendship by large donations of corn and other supplies. In 1782 (December 11) Gen. Robertson established Chickasaw Bluffs as a depot to which was sent the supplies given to the Indians. The Bluffs thus became a kind of permanent post at which the English and Chickasaws met, from time to time, till the treaty of 1818, when the entire western portion of the State was transferred to the United States, The Spanish seemed anxious to obtain this territory whether by fair means or foul. The Spanish governor of Natchez, Gayoso by name, appeared at the Chickasaw Bluffs some time between the last of May and the 9th of July; with the intention of building a fort there. He took possession of the bluff on the east side of the river within the territorial limits of the United States. He came up the river with three galleys which anchored on the side opposite the bluffs, until the materials on the west side were prepared for the erection of a block-house. When the material was ready it was quickly transferred across to the east side. and the block-house hastily erected. Complaint was made to Gov. Blount by the Chickasaws that their territorial rights had been invaded. Novem- ber 9, 1795, Gov. Blount. by direction of the President, sent a letter to Gayoso, by Col. McKee, at Fort St. Ferdinando. near the Chickasaw Bluff. This letter stated that the United States considered tl a Spanish fort at or near Chickasaw Bluff an encroachment not only upon the territorial rights of the United States but also upon the rights of the Chickasaw nation, and that the Government of the United St 1e establishment of ates expected *Hay wood.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ys him to demolish the fort, block-house or whatever military works he may have erected, and to withdraw his troops from its limits. The Spanish officers at this time from Fort Si Ferdinando and New Madrid below and to the mouth of the Ohio above allowed no boats to pass without reporting their destination and cargo. This was done to prevent supplies being sent to the Chickasaws. Col. McKee who had been sent to Gayoso did not return till in the spring of 1796, when it was learned that the Gen- eral Government had made a treaty with Spain that ended all grounds for controversy. Various treaties were made with the Ghickasaws with a view to obtain their territory in the State for settlement. Among these treaties were those of 1806-07 by which they relinguished 355,000 acres for settlement. for $22,000, and a large amount again in 1816, for which they received $4500 cash and $12,000 in ten annual installments. The final treaty by which they relinquished all West Tennessee was signed October 19, 1818, by Isaac Shelby and Andrew Jackson on the part of President James Monroe, and by the chiefs on the part of the Chicasaws. The substance of this treaty is here given. It was to settle all territorial controversies and remove all grounds of complaint or dissatisfaction which might arise to interrupt the peace and harmony so long and so happily existing between the United States and the Chickasaw nation of Indians. It ceded all lands lying north of the southern boundary of the State (except a small tract reserved for a special purpose ) described as follows: ‘Beginning on the Tennessee River about thirty-five miles by water below Col. George Colbert’s ferry, where the thirty-fifth degree of north latitude strikes the same; thence due west with said parallel to where it cuts the Mississipp1 River at or near the Chicasaw Bluffs ; thence up said river to the mouth of the Ohio; thence up the Ohio to the mouth of the Tennessee; thence up the Tennessee to the place of beginning.” * The consideration of this treaty was that the Chickasaws were to receive $20,000 annually for fifteen years to be paid to the chiefs of the nation; also a private claim of Capt. John Gordon, $1,115 due him by Gen. William Colbert of the nation; to Capt. David Smith $2,000, for supplies furnished to himself and forty-five soldiers in assisting the Chickasaws in a war with the Creeks; to Oppassantubbee, principal chief, $500 for a tract of land two miles square, reserved for him in the treaty of September 20, 1816; to John Lewis $20, for a saddle lost in the service; to John Colbert $1,089, stolen from him at a theater in Baltimore; also reservations to Col. George Colbert, May Levi Colbert *Land Tawa!sth aS a Spe hane ET ea EE eter ee TS oe SSE aa wipe - i ae en ata ae ‘nts ‘ Bey Ney _ . am 2 EE Mae j = ery a ae SEE Bis. i Ieee og a cae r 5 ea yee Gets Seer ie nenstccie WY af Peep rreterr cn enecapeneeia ster remains ores? cree ened ee ee ee Ea 154 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. and John McClish. who had married a white woman. It was further ordered that the boundary line on the south should -be marked in bold . . . : > ~ as . : , characters by commissioners agreeable to both the Ef CS eae and the Chickasaws. It was further agreed, in consideration of the raithrulness of the Chickasaws, but particularly as a “ manifestation of the friendship and liberality of the President”? of the United States, that the commis- Cc FJ J ; ; sioners pay certain sums annually to the leading chiefs of the tribe. To the time of the above treaty little effort at settlement had been made in West Tennessee. ‘The friendly feeling so long existing between : | } , . aN rT . the whites and the Chickasaws, and the determination of the Government to maintain that friendship by preventing any encroachment upon their territory, prevented a long series of murders and Indian massacres so common to the settlement of a new country. From this time the settle- ment became rapid and soon grew to vast proportions, owing to the invit- j 1 (ig? j . . « , P > : 4 © 7 Cs ing lands and large population in sections so near. Before any settle- ments had been made there were roads or traces leading through the territory on which occasionally there was a squatter. One of these roads or traces, known as the ‘‘Massac trace,” entered West Tennessee nearly south of Somerville and passed a little west of north through Haywood Another west from Countv and in the same direction to Fort Massae. in Illinois. was a United States road that entered West Waverly, and passed through the territory in a southwesterly direction. Tennessee Along the southern boundary of the State was another road or pathway. On the upper courses of the main stream of the Big Hatchie were two or three rough bridges. These roads were opened about the beginning of the present century. Among the squatters who lived on these roads was John Chambers who dwelt on the road leading south to Natchez. He The first settlers in the northwest part of the State were Stephen Mitchell, eight raised cattle and corn; the latter he sold at a very high price. miles below New Madrid, at Mitchell’s Landing on the Mississippi; Enoch Walker, at Walker’s Landing, on Reelfoot Lake; Evan Shelby, at Shelby’s Landing, also on Reelfoot Lake, and the Bone family, three miles below Shelby’s. All these were between 1818 and 1820-and were in Lake County. Others in the same county and about the same time were Robert and Jefferson Nolen, John and R. J. Rivers, Reuben and Richard Anderson, Michael Peacock, William Box, Henry Walker, Joe Bone, Robert ©. Nall, Ezekiel Williams, Thomas Wynn, Robert Thompson, Richard J. Hill, James Crockett, John Campbell, E. W. Nevill, Jesse Gray, Richard Sand, J. W. Bradford, C. H. Bird and B. B. Bird. The first settlers en- tered Obion County about 1821; among them were John Cloy, ValentineHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 155 Westerbrook, Thornton Edwards, James Hollowman, Benjamin Totten, Benjamin and David Hubbard, James Collins, John Tarr, James Bedford, John Clark, O. Roberts, Fletcher Edwards, John White, Benjamin Far- ris, William Scott, Col. Lysander Adams, Gen. George Gibbs, Hardin Talley, Robert Corwin, John Parkey, William Caldwell, Alfred McDan- iel and Benjamin Evans. The celebrated Davy Crockett assisted in lay- ing off the town of Troy in 1825, and later, when on a tour, canvassing for Congress, he was without money, and Col. William M. Wilson came to his relief and paid his hotel bill. A nice family Bible was sent to Col. Wilson from Washington by Crockett, as a reward for his kindness. It is needless to say that this is kept as a highly prized heirloom by the Wilson family. The first white child born in the county was Thomas D. Wilson, son of Col. William M. Wilson. ‘The first settlement in Weak- ley County was made in 1819. Those settling in the vicinity of Dresden were John Terrill, Perry Vincent, Dr. Jubilee Rogers, Benjamin Bondu- rant, Richard Porter, T and A. Gardner and Robert Powell. A few years later than these were Vincent Rust, Claiborne Stone, Thomas Par- ham and John H. Reams. Vincent Bust raised the first hogshead of tobacco in Weakley County +n 1835. This was-hauled by Dr. Reams to Hickman, Ky., and sold at 5 cents per pound. Those settling northeast of Dresden were Levi Mizell, Joe Wilson, John Webb, and those a little later were the families of Ridgeway, Buckley, Killebrew and Kilgore. Those on the northeast between the middle fork of Obion and the Ken- tucky line were John F. Cavitt, who settled there March 20, 1820, also John Stevenson, Isaac and William Killingham, who had preceded Stev- enson a short time and had erected a hut; John Rogers moved into the eabin with Cavitt above mentioned until he could erect a eabin for him- self. These were soon followed by J. B. Davis, Peter Williams, Marcus Austin, L. F. Abernathy and Benjamin Farmer. ‘The latter was elected constable and was given an execution levying on a cow and calf, to serve on a settler. In his simplicity he ran down the cow and rubbed the execution against her, but was unable to catch the calf; he shook the 1n- strument at it and exclaimed: “you too, calfy.” Alexander Paschall was one of the first settlers in the northeast part of the county ; he came there in 1824 from Carroll County, N. C. As evidence of the sparsely settled country, Paschall, in building his house, invited all persons living within a circuit of twelve miles, and got only thirty-one hands. Other settlers about the same time were Daniel Laswell, Sr.. John and George Harlin and Peter Mooney. It is said the first preaching in that vicinity was by a colored minis- ter. Everybody was anxious to go to church, but few of the women had"" ey >, ¥ Pe EE ey : I a 3 et : 2 S PY ; 156 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. a change of dresses. Mrs. Paschall having seven, loaned six to her less fortunate sisters and thus enabled them to attend the first preaching in that vicinity. On Mud Creek were settled Reuben Edmunson, Dudley Glass, Sr., Levi Clark and Israel Jones. Between Mud Creek and Mid- dle Fork were Owen Parrish, Thomas Etheridge, father of Hon. Emerson Etheridge, A. Clemens, J. W. Rogers and John Jenkins. Between Middle and South Fork were Duke Cantrell, M. H. G. Williams, William Hills, Alfred Bethel, F. A. Kemp and Calloway Hardin. Higher up the river were Robert Mosely, E. D. Dickson, James Hornback, John and G. Bradshaw and Richard Drewery. Southeast on Upper Spring Creek were Thomas Osborne, A. Demming, Isaac Crew, Robert Gilbert, Jona- than Gilbert, James and Alfred Smith, William Hamilton, Francis Lid- dle, John O’Neal, James Kennedy and Tilghman Johnson. On Thomp- son’s Creek were John Thomas, Daniel Campbell, Samuel Morgan, Elijah Stanley, M. Shaw, William Gay, John H. Moore and Hayden E. Wells. On Lower Cypress were Capt. John Rogers, E. P. Latham, the Carneys, McLeans, Scultzs and Stewarts. On Upper Cypress were the Rosses, Thompsons, Winsteads and Beadles. Davy Crockett settled near the junction of South and Rutherford Forks of Obion, in Weakley County, and was elected to the Legislature the same year on a majority of 247 votes. He was beaten for Congress in 1825 and 1827 by Hon. A. R. Alexander on a majority of only two votes each time. He was elected in 1829 by 3,585 votes. He was beaten by William Fitzgerald in 1831, and he in turn beat Fitzgerald in 1833 by a good majority. Crockett was himself beaten in 1835 by Adam Huntzman, a wooden-legged lawyer. Crockett Le eee + a : was in Congress the author of the ‘‘occupant’s bill,” a measure to give each settler 200 acres of land. Henry Stunson, who was born in 1821, was the first white child born in Weakley County. The first cabin built by a white man was erected in 1819 by John Bradshaw. The settlement in the northeastern part of the western section of the State began in 1819; the first settlers were from Stewart County: they were Joel Ragler, John Studdart and James Williams. They came in wagons, having made their way through the forest and settled near Man- leyville. When they arrived at Big Sandy it was so high they could not cross. After waiting two weeks they were compelled to make a canoe and a raft. When these were completed some of the party hesitated to <= ce sith a yg TE enter. As evidence of the bold spirit of those ploneer women, “‘Granny”’ Se aCe AAS SAO Studdart, on seeing the hesitation of the party, said, “I—Ill get in.” > ~ Pre AW a Se She did so, and soon all were landed safely on the other shore. Other settlers near Paris were James Leiper, Gen. Richard Porter, John Brown. J. L. Allen and Dr. T. K. Allen. A horse-mill was erected by John Sa PRL TET ie cena EL eet hdl bee t re F : Le aj | | Se ar pei ie. eontecins mesma serene insNASHVILLE + THUSS KOELLEIN &G/ERS: Davig GROCKETT’ ee a gee gen ———— Se ee ee eee eee caster nena pom <2 a GS Ta as eS SITE Tae rE ee ‘ = oH bhi | ; { Pi ney he ne ee NEI Hi ob iy ) i BT ae © bE heel bh i Pt } ie Re: eae 2 a Sof i a ptt i | CRiem ei } Hat ? A ee a iz mea te Bld ha | EEE CURR | r Ppa! q eet 4 1 Haiti! ch FLenel my ney EEL MRR Et Wey ' Bi Hi ¥ ' 1 | . ml P tit bw et tia tll ; 1 Pee hen ' | i ; i ' AE i tae | hay Le bil ii tie y j ae hia Per eal Pata 1G) Purell i eit re | \ Bey: I LEC hie hh | at , f riaia ie og Py ee aa he a} iat Mu tH HL ‘ wig ae 1 ¥ bie HEI ‘ i] ¢ |i ; ; PERE ta | \f i | f Bit a a Wi | i ty aR ie net i il | bE : Th SES | PEE | : 4 iH ie E SHE i : f | ii i i rp i it Bee HT | | Wi at UAE mi Be} i 5 lH a. i li i EP t a | i | te I a 1 i i} | HEE Bh \ te | { i | Hh | { iat if { tie it OE Be i j fal ii a i ve ae (f 1 i ee a Bik | SPL WL 1a t Hy be | a! wae A Det | behHISTORY OF TENNESSEE 157 Carter, near Springville, in 1820, and a water-mill in the northwest part of this county in the same year by Thomas James. Settlements began in Dyer County in 1823. William Nash settled between the forks of Forked Deer River: John Rutledge at Key Corner, and the Dugan family on Obion Lake. The first house built in Dyers- burg was erected by Elas Dement, and had only a dirt floor. Amone other settlers in this section were John Rutherford. Benjamin Porter John Bowers, William Bowers and William Martin. Nathaniel Benton. another settler, was a brother of Thomas H. Benton, who moved to Dver County about 1518. The section away from the large rivers—the Ten. nessee and Mississippi—was not settled quite so early as those along the rivers. In what is now Gibson County the first settlement began about h 1819. Those who settled in that year were Thomas Fite, John Spencer and J. F. Randolph. This settlement was made about eight miles east of Trenton. Other settlers followed in rapid succession; among them were Luke and Reuben Biggs, William Holmes, John B. Hogg, David P. Hamilton, Col. Thomas Gibson, John Ford and W. GC. Love. That part of West Tennessee now embraced in Carroll County was settled by Thomas Hamilton on Cedar Creek, near McKenzie: John Woods on Ruch erford Fork of Obion; Samuel McKee, Spencer and Nathaniel Edwards on the Big Sandy; and HK. C. Daugherty where McLemoresville now stands; and John Blunt, who built a mill on a branch of the Big Sandy in 1821—22. Settlements in Benton County began in 1819-20, the Anat settler being William and D. Rushing, on Rushing Creek, six miles . QO north of Camden; the next was by Nicholas and Lewis Browers in 1820. on Randall Creek, twelve miles from Camden; Thomas and William Minnis, on Bird Song Creek, in 1820. Lauderdale County was first set- tled by Benjamin Porter, in April, 1820. He moved from Reynolds- ville by way of the Tennessee, the Ohio; thence down the Mississippi to the mouth of the Forked Deer; thence up said river to Key Corner, near which place he settled and remained till his death. The first flat-boat on Forked Deer River brought the family, household goods and stock of Henry Benjamin to Lauderdale County in 1820. One of the first cotton gins in West Tennessee is said to have been built at Key Corner in 1827, by John Jordan and William Chambers. Capt. Shockey ran the first steam-boat, the “Grey Eagle,’ up Forked Deer River in 1836. Capt. Thomas Durham, of North Carolina, settled at what 1s now Durhamvyille, in 1826. A man named Vincent settled at Fulton, near the Chickasaw Bluffs, on the Mississippi, in 1819, and John A. Givens, from South Carolina, one and one-half miles east of the blutt in 1820. Other set- . - : : aN tlers in Lauderdale were Henry and John Rutherford, sons of Gen. ie)58 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. @riffith Rutherford, of North Carolina. James Sherman, who resided in Wauderdale for a great many years, was once on a jury which was trying They were unable to agree, and stood six for -con- ; The judge refused to release the x man for his life. siction and six for clearing the man. It was finally agreed to leave the matter toa A deck was sent for and the champions were d, but by the fortunate turn of a yary without a verdict. vame of ‘‘seven-up. » zghosen. The game was hotly eonteste zard the game was decided in favor of the defendant. hed for on excellent authority, and shows This story, though seemingly incredible, is vouc Hhe crude idea of administering justice in that day. The first settlers in Tipton County were from Middle Tennessee and the older States. Among these were H. Terrell, E. T. Pope, R. W. San- ford, Gen. Jacob Tipton, Maj. Lauderdale, Capt. Scurry, Dr. Hold, the Durhams, Mitchells, Davises, Pryors, Hills, Parrishes and Garlands. In the White and Archer neighborhood were C. C. Archer, George Shark- ley, William McGuire and the Whites. In and near Randolph were K. H. Douglass, George W. Frazier, Thomas Robinson, Jesse Benton, M. Phillips, R. H. Munford, A. N. McAllister, W. P. Mills, Anderson Hunt, {he Simpsons and Clements. On Big Creek were Dr. R. H. Rose, Henry Turnage, Capt Jones, Capt. Newman, Alfred Hill and Maj. Legrand. The vicinity of Indian Creek was settled by the Smiths, Owens, Kellers, Kinneys and Walks. “ Old Uncle Tommy” Ralp built a horse-mill one mile from Covington, this being perhaps the first in the county. The portion of West Tennessee known as Crockett County, was set- ‘led about 1823. Among the first inthis section were John B. Boykin, B. B. Epperson, Alexander Avery, David Nann, Isaac Koonse, Thomas Thw- att, James Friar Randolph, Anthony Swift, John McFarland, John Yancey, Zepheniah Porter, Solomon Rice, Giles Hawkins, Joseph Clay, John Bowers, E. Williams, Cornelius Bunch and Robert Johnson. J. F. Randolph, above mentioned, moved with his father from Alabama, and settled at McMinnville, Warren County; thence to West Tennessee. I M. Johnson was a native of Rutherford County, and settled in what was then Haywood, now Crockett, in 1823. Into Haywood County the whites began to enter about 1820. ‘The first permanent settler is believed to have been Col. Richard Nixon, m 1821, who was born October 26, 1769, and whose father was a Revolutionary soldier. For his services in that war he was reward- ed by a grant of 3,600 acres of land. The grant fell in Haywood ~— — eA ee eae a a a County, and on a portion of this Col. Nixon settled. His place of settlement was on Nixon Creek, about four miles from Brownsville TT / ] ¢ ry 1 i ‘ T ; * - ‘ - 7 a Lawrence McGuire, David Hay, Sr., B. H. Sanders, David Jefferson, N. Se ae ae or aa aero degrees epee oa saabetgna orcas, "0 ns eoecacaoeeipgooy GapameopNaae a _ < — a a AREER ag — ~ : con a ee } a = oe ooHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 159 T. Perkins, David Cherry and Joel Estes, were among those who found homes on the north side of the river. Those settling down amidst the virgin forest on the south side of the river were Oliver Wood, B. G. Alexander, Samuel P. Ashe and Rey. Thomas P. Neely. The latter of these came between 1826 and 1828. It was at the house of Col. Nixon that the first courts were established in 1824. As rivers were about the only means of egress at that time nearly all settlements were made along the river courses. : After the final treaty with the Chickasaws, by which they gave up West ‘Tennessee, the inhabitants from East and Middle Tennessee, North and South Carolina and Virginia began to pour rapidly into those un- occupied lands. The first in the vicinity of Jackson were Adam R. Alexander, William Doak and Lewis Jones. In the Wilson neigh- borhood were Theophilus and David Launder, and Mr, Lacy. In 1820 John Hargrave and Duncan McIver settled in the vicinity of “Old Cot- ton Grove,” and a little later John Bradley; about the same time J. Wad- dell settled on Spring Creek. The city of Jackson was built on lands owned by B. G. Stewart, Joseph Lynn and James Trousdale. Dr. Will- iam Butler planted cotton in 1821, in this county; also erected a gin the same year, which was brought all the way from Davidson County. 3ernard Mitchell brought a keel-boat loaded with goods, groceries and whisky, up Forked Deer, and landed within one mile and a half of Jack- son; this was the first to vex the waters of that stream. Pioneers came into Henderson County in 1821; a few came earlier. Joseph Reel was beyond doubt the first permanent white settler in the county. He came to the place in 1818, and settled on Beech River, about five miles east of the present site of Lexington. Hissons John and Will- iam remained on the same land during their lifetime. Abner Taylor set- tled near the site of Lexington; Maj. John Harmon near the head waters of the Big Sandy; Jacob Bartholomew and William Hay at the head of Beech River; William Cain and George Powers near the site of Pleas- ant Exchange; William Doffy at the head waters of the south branch otf Forked Deer River; William Dismukes on the north fork of Forked Deer, and Joseph Reed near Pine Knob. This county developed rapidly. A mill was built on Mud Creek, in 1821, by John and William Brigham, and one on Forked Deer about the same time by Daniel Barecroft. A horse-mill was built on the road from Lexington to Trenton about the same time; also a cotton-gin by Maj. John Harmon, on Beech Creek, in 1823. The first legal hanging in the vicinity was the execution of a slave woman of Dr. John A. Wilson’s for the willful drowning of his daughter. Willis Deeden, who moved into this county from North Car-160 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. olina, was a man remarkable for size; his weight was never known, but was estimated at 800 pounds. Samuel Wilson owned the land on which the city of Lexington now stands; this was set apart for the city in 1822. The land office was established at the house of Samuel Wilson in the same year. The rich and attractive lands on the Tennessee in the southeastern as first to attract immigrants. Almost as soon as ae 7 li . FA er SO ae nn Se portion of this county w the Indian title was extinguished, 1818, immigrants began to pour into this section of the newly acquired territory. That portion of the country known as Hardin County was laid off in 1820 and named in honor of Capt. John Hardin, of Revolutionary tame. James Hardin settled at the mouth of Horse Creek, a tributary entering the Tennessee not far from Savannah, in 1815 or 1819, and a horse-mill was erected on the same stream by Charles B. Nelson in 1819. It was doubtless from this source that the stream got its name. T. CG. Johnson, Lewis Faulkner, Samuel Faulkner and Daniel Robinson settled on Turkey Creek about 1820. Hiram Boon settled on a small stream that was afterward called Boon’s Creek. James White gave a name to a small creek, a tributary of Horse Greek. Thomas White became a resident on Flat Gap Creek in 1819. Samuel Parmley, Thomas Cherry and Samuel Bruton became residents — of this section at a little later period, all of whom were on the east side of the river. On the west side of the river, opposite the mouth of Horse Creek, Simpson Lee, Nathaniel Way and James McMahan took claims in 1818 or 1819. The pioneers were compelled, before the erection of mills, to depend upon the mortar or hand-mill for meal. This being 1 faa ' i . | a i rather a slow process water or horse-mills were encouraged and liberally ee. ae = ee a same patronized. A water-mill was built by Jesse Lacewell, on Smith’s Fork of Indian Creek, in 1819, and another about the same time and near the same place by John Williams. Few regular ferries were to be found at that time. The Indian with his light or birch-bark canoe was enabled to cross the stream at almost any time as he could carry his boat with him. It was not till after his white brother got possession of the country that regular ferries were established. Among the first of these was one at Rudd’s Bluff, just above where Savannah now stands. This was in 1818. Lewis H. Broyles opened a store in this section in 1819-20. His goods were loaded on a flat-boat in East Tennessee and floated down the Tennessee to the place of landing. The first marriage cere- mony in this county was performed by Rey. James English in 1818 the contracting parties being A. B. Gantt and Miss M. Boon. All the necessary wants of a civilized and progressive people were soon supplied SS ee. a Py) . . Ri me nm to these people, as a school was being taught near Hardinsville in 1820, PR Ty PON in . ae hse >; a oe . : oN ae ie Re Se 1 ’ 3 =HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 161 ‘by Nathaniel Casey; a church of the Primitive Baptists was built on Turkey Creek in 1819-20, with Rey. Charles Riddle as pastor; a cotton- gin was built by James Boyd on Horse Creek in 1822. Courts were established in January, 1820, at the house of Col. James Hardin, near the mouth of Horse Creek. A small log court house was soon after erected, having a dirt floor and dimensions 16x20 feet. A large hollow tree sufficed for an improvised jail. Immediately west of Hardeman County lies McNairy; this county being away from any of the larger streams immigrants did not reach it quite so early as some of the counties whose location was geographically more favorable. Among the pioneers of this county were Abel Oxford, who settled on Oxford Creek below the mouth of Cypress; also Quincy Hodge and William 8. Wisdom with their families settled in the south- i west part of the county. Others were John Shull, Peter Shull, John Plunk, John Woodburn.and Francis Kirby, whose son, Hugh Kirby, was the first white child born, 1821, in the county. James Reed and Allen Sweat came from North Carolina and settled in McNairy about 1824. John Chambers and N. Griffith established the first business house in the county. A water-mill was built on Cypress Creek in 1824, by Boyd i & Barnesett. dt Lying in the upper valley of the Big Hatchie is Hardeman County. | Settlements began in this portion of West Tennessee in 1819-20. Among the first and for whom the county was named was Col. Thomas J. Hardeman, also Col. Ezekiel Polk, his son William Polk and son-in-law i Thomas McNeal. Before permanent settlements began a number of tran- | sient persons had squatted in different parts of the county. Among them was Joseph Fowler, who settled at Fowler’s Ferry, about sixteen miles south of Bolivar. The next permanent settlement was made by William Shinault in the southwest part of the county, not far from Hickory Val- ley. Jacob Purtle raised a crop of corn near ‘“‘ Hatchie Town,” in the neighborhood ot Thomas McNeal’s in 1821. William Polk made a crop a the same year, five miles north of Bolivar. On the organization of the county court, in 1823, he was made chairman. A mill was built by Sam- i uel Polk on Pleasant Run Creek, one and one-half miles east of the pres- ) ent site of Bolivar, about 1823; a second one was built on Mill Creek | about six miles south of Bolivar, in the same year, for Col. John Murray by John Golden. A school was taught in the Shinault neighborhood in i 1823-24 by Edwin Crawford. Maj. John H. Bills and Prudence McNeal {I were the first couple united in marriage in that vicinity by the laws of civilization. The steam-boat “‘Roer,” commanded by Capt. Newman, ! was the first to stem the waters of Hatchie as far up as Bolivar.Se nee rc iene ee , re * I TET a ery San? IE = See a eee o ne = “ase 7 RE RES a ESS Ses a ata a es SG Mian sg zi ~ —_~ el — EES al ee Re ee ea ein ee =n a : . 162 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 1822-23. Among the first Carolina and settled in the Thornton and Joel Lang- Fayette County began to be settled about was Thomas J. Cocke, who came from North A, oe northwest part of the county 1n 1323: KG ham followed soon after. Where Somerville now stands the lands were entered by George Bowers and James Brown some time before 1825. and other beasts of the shout the territory. Joseph Simpson 1e court house of the county Bears and wolves forest were then holding almost undisputed sway throu claimed to have killed a bear, near where tl in 1824. The county seat, Somerville, was named in honor now stands, at Horseshoe Bend in bat- of Lieut. Robert Somerville, who was killed tle with the Indians. Other settlers were David Jornegan, Thomas Cook, \. Horace Loomis, Dr. Smith, Henry Kirk, Daniel Head (a gunsmith), Henry M. Johnson, William Owen, L. G. Evans, William Ramsey, Daniel Cliff and John T. Patterson, with their families. The oldest and most wealthly division in West Tennessee is Shelby County. Could the rocks and rillss and ‘‘the tongues in trees” tell their story of the past, volumes of un- told interest would be reve It is problematical whether the first white man to tread the soil of this portion. of +t was left to the French Father Marquette or peak or “the books in running brooks”’ aled to us which must forever remain hidden. the adventurous Spaniard, DeSoto, in the year 1540, was Tennessee or whether Bienville; yet this much is certain, it is historic ground, around which cluster many events having great weight in the march of civilization. Known as it was for more than 200 years with its inviting prospects, it seems strange that the polished hand of civilization should have been held back so long. The Chickasaw Bluffs were long a place of getting or receiving supplies between the whites and Indians; it did not become a place of permanent abode for the whites till about 1818-19. Among the first settlers in Shelby County were Joel Kagler and James Williams. Shelby was admitted into the sisterhood of counties on November 24, 1819, although the first court was not held until May 1, 1824. ‘his was opened at Chickasaw Bluffs on the above date. As few if any roads were open for travel through the county, the first was opened From Mem- phis to the Taylor Mill settlement on Forked Deer River. Persons con- nected with road officially were Thomas H. Persons, John Fletcher, John CG. McLemore, Marcus B. Winchester, Charles Holeman and William Erwin. William Irvine was the legalized ferryman at Memphis in 1820. The following were the rates charged: Hach man and horse, $1; each loose horse, 50 cents; each hog or sheep, 25 cents; each four-wheeled carriage drawn by four horses, the wagon being empty, $3; the same, loaded, $5; each four-wheeled vehicle and two horses, $1.50; the pe ng rie? on Saet Tah hy eeeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 163 same, loaded, $2.50. The first ordinaries or houses of entertainment were kept in the city of Memphis in 1820 by Joseph James and Patrick Meagher. ‘These houses were regulated by law as to charges, board being $2.50 to $3.50 per week or $1 per day. A horse was kept at $2.50 a week or 50 cents per day. The court was somewhat itinerant in its nature at first, having been changed to Raleigh in 1827, and then ie Colliersyille in 1837. Peggy Grace is said to have purchased the first lot after the city of Memphis was laid out. Among the earliest settlers in the county were W. A. Thorp, who owned a grant near the old State a little north of it place, a little south of the old line. On Big Creek, in 1820, were settled Jesse Benton, Charles McDaniel, D. C. Treadwell, Samuel Smith and Joel Crenshaw. In the vicinity of Raleigh were Dr. Benjamin Hawkins, William P. Reaves, Thomas Taylor and William Sanders. The first American white child born in Shelby County was John W. Williams, in line and Peter Adams, who settled near the same 1822. The steam-boat, ‘‘Aitna” was the first to make regular trips to the wharf at Memphis early in the decade of the twenties. A. brief retrospect shows that in a few years after the Indian title was extin- guished in West Tennessee, the whole country was changed as if by magic into an abode of civilization, wealth and refinement. In less than a decade every part of it was organized into counties, having their courts, churches, schools and accumulating wealth.pan MATA Saeeliniieremenen Se Steengicte ier ens SR SAAS ASI SE rere EP la a ea Ry Fae gh ee nite == mare Oe eee = i - ee Per pA pA saan Sy a bbe ae pT nn er near ee eae HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. CHEAPAIR WV Je ORGANIZATION—THE EUROPEAN CHARTERS—PROPRIETARY GRANTS—THE BOUND- ARY CONTROVERSIES—CAUSES OF DISPUTE—FAILURE OF ATTEMPTED SET- TLEMENT OF THE QUESTION—FINAL EsTABLISHMENT—NEW CAUSES FOR DISPUTE—EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERN LINE—JTHE WALKER AND THE HENDERSON SURVEYS—THE RESULTING CONFUSION—OPINION OF GOY. BLOUNT—THE DEMANDS OF KENTUCKY—NEGOTIATIONS—ILLOGICAL POSI- TION OF TENNESSEE—THE COMPROMISE OF 1820—THE READJUSTMENT OF 1860 _THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY ESTABLISHED IN 1818 AND IN 1821—THE WATAUGA ASSOCIATION—OFFICERS AND LAWS—THE GOVERNMENT OF THE NOTABLES—THE “COMPACT” OR « AGREEMENT”—LAWS—THE STATE OF FRANKLIN—CAUSES WHICH LED TOITS FoORMATION—FORM OF GOVERNMENT —_THE First LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY—INTERFERENCE OF NORTH CAROLINA _RESISTANCE OF Gov. SEVIER—RATIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION— CONFLICT OF AUTHORITY—SEVERE MEASURES—FALL OF THE STATE OF FRANKLIN. HE first charter granted by an English sovereign to an English : subject to lands in North America, was by Queen Elizabeth to Sir Humphrey Gilbert, to any lands he might discover in North America. Tts date was about June 11, 1578, and it was to be of perpetual efficacy provided the plantation should be established within six years. After several failures Sir Humphrey made a determined effort in 1583 to plant a colony on the island of Newfoundland, which resulted fatally to himself, his little bark of ten tons going down in a storm with himself and all on board. The second grant was by Queen Elizabeth to Sir Walter Raleigh, and was dated March 26, 1584. It was similar in its provisions, to that granted to Sir Humphrey Gilbert, and as Sir Walter’s patent included what is now Tennessee, those provisions may be briefly stated in this connection. They are worthy of particular attention, as they unfold the ideas of that age respecting the rights of ‘‘ Christian rulers,” to countries inhabited by savage nations, or those who had not yet been brought under the benign influences of the gospel. : Elizabeth authorized Sir Walter to discover, and take possession of all barbarous lands unoccupied by any Christian prince or. people, and vested in him, his heirs and assigns forever, the right of property in the soil of those countries of which he should take possession. Permission was given such of the Queen’s subjects as were willing to accompany Sir Walter to go and settle in the countries which he might plant, and he was empowered, as were also his heirs and assigns, to dispose of what- + So - eaHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 165 ever portion of those lands he or they should judge fit to persons settling there in fee simple acccording to the laws of England; she conferred upon him, his heirs and assigns, the complete jurisdiction and royalties, as well marine as other within the said lands and seas thereunto adjoin- ing, and gave him full power to convict, punish, pardon, govern and rule in causes capital and criminal, as well as civil, all persons who should from time to time settle in these countries, according to such laws and ordinances, as should by him, or by his heirs and assigns, be devised and established. : Raleigh, one of the most enter prising, accomplished and versatile men of his time was eager to undertake and execute the scheme of settling his grant, and, in pursuit of this design, despatched two small vessels under command of Amadas and Barlow, two officers of trust, to visit the coun- try which he intended to settle. In order to avoid the serious error made by Sir Humphrey Gilbert, in coasting too far north, Raleigh’s captains selected the course by the Canary and West India Islands, and arrived on the American coast July 4, 1584, landing on the island of Wocoken. Raleigh’s grant was named by the Queen “ Virginia,” in commemoration of her state of life. But notwithstanding the precautions of the captains, and the smiles of the virgin queen upon the various attempts made to settle this grant, these attempts all terminated no less disastrously than had Sir Gilbert’s, and at the end of Queen Elizabeth’s reign, in 1603, not a solitary Englishman had effected a permanent settlement on North American soil. In 1607, however, a more successful effort was made to form a perma- nent English colony on this continent at Jamestown, in Virginia. In 1609 a second charter was granted to tis colony, investing the company with the election of a council, and the exercise of legislative power inde- pendent of the crown. In 1612 a third patent conferre 2d upon the com- pany a more democratic form of government, and in 1619 the colonists were themselves allowed a share in legislation. In 1621 a written con- stitution was brought out by Sir Francis Wyatt, under which constitution each colonist became a freeman and a citizen. The colony prospered, and extended its southern boundaries to Albemarle Sound, upon which the first permanent settlers of North Carolina pitched their tents, hav- ing been attracted in this direction by reports of an adventurer from Virginia, who, upon returning from an expedition of some kind, spoke in the most glowing terms of the kindness of the people, of the excellence of the ail and of the salubrity of the climate. Representations of this kind reaching England had the eitect of stimulating into activity the ambition ar eupidity of certain English ————————mars = ret ro x oe ne - 7 ~ oo a rate a a =e 2h Ee Sate oi Ai TE meer I nem — att eS at ata «ha tS Sa OES Se a | Seen SS gp Bapneennspuenlpseapinrrsasannsnanepionpaymaseemeecsmeaonle set cies 166 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. courtiers, and on March 24, 1663, Charles IL made a grant to Edward, Earl of Clarendon, “hated by the people, faithful to the king;” Monk, “conspicuous in the Resto ‘ation, now the Duke of Albemarle;” Lord Graven, “brave cavalier, supposed to be the husband of the Queen of Bo- hemia;” Lord Ashley Cooper, afterward Earl of Shaftesbury; Sir John Colleton; Lord John Berkeley and his younger brother, Sir William Berkeley, and Sir George Carteret, ‘passionate, ignorant and not too honest,” the grant including the country between the thirty-first and thirty-sixth parallels of latitude, and extending from the Atlantic to the Pacifie Ocean. Notwithstanding the extent of this grant the proprietaries above named, in June, 1665, secured by another patent its enlargement and an enlargement of their powers. This second charter granted by King Charles II was in part as follows: CHARLES THE SECOND, BY THE GRACE OF GoD, OF GREAT BRITAIN, FRANCE AND IRELAND, KING, DEFENDER OF THE FAITH, ETC. WHEREAS, By our letters patent, bearing date the 24th of March, in the fifteenth year of our reign, we were graciously pleased to grant unto our right trusty and right well beloved cousin and counsellor, Edward, Earl of Clarendon, our high chancellor of Eng- land [here follow the names of the other grantees as given above] all that province, territory or tract of ground called Carolina, situate, lying and being within our dominions of America, extending from the north end of the island called Luke Island, which leth in the southern Virginia seas, and within thirty-six degrees of north latitude, and to the west as far as the South seas, and so south respectively as far as the river Matthias, which bor- dereth upon the coast of Florida and within thirty-one degrees of northern latitude, and so west in a direct line as far as the South seas aforesaid. Know ye, that at the humble request of the said grantees, we are graciously pleased to enlarge our said grant unto them according to the bounds and limits hereafter specified, and in favor of the pious and noble purpose* of the said Edward, Earl of Clarendon [the names of the other proprietaries here follow], their heirs and assigns, all that province, territory or tract of land, situate, lying and being within our dominions of America as aforesaid, extending north and eastward as far as the north end of Currituck River or Inlet, upon a straight line westerly to Wyonoak Creek, which lies within or about the degree of thirty-six and thirty minutes, north latitude, and so west in a direct line as far as the South seas, and south and westward as far as the degree of twenty-nine, inclusive, of northern latitude, and so west in a direct line as far as the South seas, together with all and singu- lar the ports, harbors, bays, rivers and inlets belonging unto the province and territory aforesaid. This grant was made June 30, 1665, and embraced the territory now included in the following States: North and South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Arkansas, and parts of Florida, Missouri, Texas, New Mexico and California. The line of thirty- six degrees and thirty minutes extending 5 from the top of the Alleghany Mountains to the eastern bank of the Tennessee River. separates Virginia and Kentucky from Tennessee. The powers granted to the lords, pro- prietors of this immense province, were those of dictating constitutions es + * > a : a « i ee s S This pious and noble purpose was none other than the increase of their own worth and dignity.HISTORY OF TENNESSEER. 167 and laws for the people by and with the advice and assent of the freemen thereof, or the greater part of them, or of their delegates or deputies, who were to be assembled from time to time for that purpose. This munificent grant was surrendered to the King July 20, 1729, by seven of the eight proprietors under authority of an act of parliament (2nd George, 2nd ch., 84), each of the seven receiving £2,500, besides a small sum for quit rents. The eighth proprietor, Lord Carteret, after- ward Earl Granville, on the 17th of September, 1744, relinquished his claim to the right of government, but by a commission appointed, jointly by the King and himself, was given his eighth of the soil granted by the charter, bounded as follows: ‘North by the Virginia line, east by the Atlantic, south by latitude thirty-five degrees thirty-four minutes north, and west as far as the bounds of the charter.” Prior to this the govern- ment of Carolina had been proprietary; but now (after 1729) it became regal, and the province was divided into two governments, North and South Carolina, in 1732. The Georgia Charter, issued in 1732, comprised much of the Carolina grant, but after 1752 the proprietors gave up the government, which also then became regal. ‘Tennessee from this time until the treaty of Paris, in 1782, continued the property of the British Government, when all right to it was relinquished to North Carolina. It may be interesting to the general reader to learn that the descendant of Lord Carteret, who had become the Earl of Granville before the Revolutionary war, brought suit a short time before the war of 1812 in the Cireuit Court of the United States for the district of North Carolina, for the recovery of his possessions. The case, as we from the Hon. W. H. Battle, formerly one of the judges of the eme Court of North Carolina, was tried before C. J. Marshall, and as then the district judge, and resulted in a verdict and learn Supr Judge Potter, who w judgment against the plaintiff, whereupon he appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. 2efore the case could be heard in that court the war of 1812 came on, which puta stop to it and it was never revived. William Gaston (afterward Judge Gaston), then a young man, appeared in the suit for the plaintiff, and Messrs. Cameron (afterward Judge Cameron), Baker (afterward Judge Baker) and Woods appeared for the defendants. The question was whether Lord Granville’s rights, which had been confiscated by the State of North Carolina during the Bevolutionary war, had been restored by the treaty of peace between the United States and Great Britain. The case was never reported. Thus passed away the last vestige of the most munificent oift of which history makes mention.* *Ijllebrew’s Resources of Tennessee.16S HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The twenty-fifth section of the Declaration of Rights of North Caro- lina at the time of the adoption of her constitution in December. 1776. so far as it relates to the boundary of that State, is as follows: The property of the soil in a free government being one of the essential rights of the collective body of the people, it is necessary in order to avoid future disputes, that the limits of the State should be ascertained with precision; and as the former temporary line between North and South Carolina was confirmed and extended by commissioners appoint- ed by the Legislatures of the two States agreeable to the order of the late King George the Second in Council, that line and that only should be esteemed the southern boundary of this State as follows, that isto say: Beginning on the sea-side at a cedar stake at or near the mouth of Little River, being the southern extremity of Brunswick County; and runs thence a northwest course through the Boundary House which stands in thirty-three degrees and fifty-six minutes to thirty-five degrees north latitude; and from thence a west course so far as is mentioned in the charter of King Charles the Second to the late pro- Therefore all the territories, seas, waters and harbors with their prietors of Carolina: appurtenances, lying between the line above described and the southern line of the State of Virginia, which begins on the sea shore in thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes north latitude; and from thence runs west agreeable to the said charter of King Charles I., the right and property of the people of this State to be held by them in sovereignty, any partial line without the consent of the Legislature of this State at any time thereafter directed or laid out in any wise notwithstanding. A number of provisos was included in the section, the last being that “nothing herein contained shall affect the title or possessions of individuals holding or claiming under the laws heretofore in force, or grants heretofore made by the late King George the Third, or his pred- ecessors, or the late lord proprietors or any of them.”’ The history of the establishment of the line—thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes—as the northern boundary of North Carolina, is as fol- lows: James I, King of England, on May 23, 1609, made a grant to tobert, Earl of Salisbury; Thomas, Earl of Suffolk, and numerous other persons, “of all those countries lying in that part of America called Vir- ginia, from the point of land called Cape or Point Comfort, all along the sea-coast to the northward 200 miles, and from the same Point Comfort all along the sea-coast to the southward 200 miles, and all that space or circuit of land throughout from sea to sea.”” The above was the enlarged Sie mee ith — RRC et ART grant to the London Company, and extended along the Atlantic coast from Sandy Hook to Cape Fear, and from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. In 1620 the grant to the Plymouth Company made the fortieth parallel their southern limit, and established that parallel as the northern = boundary of Virginia. On March 24, 1662, Charles II made his first grant to the proprietors of Carolina as recited above, and on June 30. 1665, Charles II enlarged this grant, as also recited above, and named a = - line destined to become only less famous in the history of the United States than Mason and Dixon’s line, viz.: the line of thirty-six decrees « ee co < and thirty minutes north latitude. The language of this second charter i oaeneennaeseemasasaliaeas aac aaa pagenane) atoms c eee a “ engenders Saabieeeeens nanehommenonde = ; a — ————— 5 | pore wey. 8 geo . hy Oe Oe ie ts F ri Hiatt. SS RR ig le i iHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 169 of Charles II, so far asit pertains to this famous line, is as follows: ‘All the province, etc., in America, extending north and eastward as far as the north end of Currituck River or inlet, upon a straight westerly line to Wyonoak Creek. which lies within or about thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes northern latitude, and so west ona direct line at far as the South Seas.” North Carolina was called “ Our County of Albemarle,” in Caro- lina until about 1700, when it began to be called the Colony of North Carolina. The boundary line between North Carolina and Virginia soon began to be the source of considerable altercation between the two colonies. for the reason that the grant of Charles I overlapped the grant of his grandfather, James I. That this altercation was not fol- lowed by strife and bloodshed was due in part to the necessity of mutual aid and defense during the protracted struggle preceding and during the Revolution. But notwithstanding the forbearance thus caused and mani- fested is was necessary to locate this unlocated boundary line, for Vir- ginians were continually claiming lands south of the proper line, under what they supposed to be titles from the Crown, and North Carolinians were as continually entering lands to the north of the proper limits under warrants from the lord proprietors of Carolina. The London Company had been dissolved by James I, and when this dissolution occurred Virginia became a royal province; hence the settle- ment of the boundary line between Virginia and Carolina devolved upon the Crown and the lord proprietors. Karly in 17 10 commissioners n of England, met similar commissioners represent- representing the Crow for their object the settlement of this ing the lord proprietors, haying vexed question. But upon attempting to fix upon a starting point, they failed to agree by a difference of about fifteen miles; hence they separa- ted without having accomplished anything. Against the Carolina com- missioners serious charges were made. On the Ist of March, 1710, an order of council was issued, from which the following is extracted: “The commissioners of Carolina are both persons engaged in interest to obstruct the settling of the boundaries; for one of them has been for sey- eral years surveyor general of Carolina, and has acquired great profit to ontroverted bounds, and has taken himself by surveying lands within the ce The other of them is at this up several tracts of land in his own name. and hath the same prospect of advantage by The conclusion of the eased to order as it time surveyor general, making future surveys within the same bounds.” order is as follows: ‘‘ Her Majesty, in Council, is pl ordered, the Right Honorable, the Lord Commissioners for sty’s pleasure herein to her for the time is hereby Trade and Plantations, do signify her Maye Majesty’s Governor or Commander-in-chief of Virginia5 ; iF F a ee gece; 4 2 | place 1 R f F iM f ; a re | . a ro =e < ee : OTe eee nee ees ee a act oe I re LA c a pre Ke ay erengamiie ogre a at oR NSE A OILS MRR ia, SS ARUEO TE iat Rae Chay Phi i as 1 ee” Hy ee 3 aap epee aes 170 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. being, and to all persons to whom it may belong, as is proposed by their Lordships in said representation, and the Right Honorable, the Lord Proprietors of Carolina are to do what on their part does appertain.”’ In January, 1711, commissioners appointed by both the governors of North Carolina and Virginia again attempted to settle the question, but failed to complete their task for want of money. Great inconvenience to the settlers was the result of this protracted controversy, and a remedy was sought in an act, the preamble of which was as follows: WHEREAS, great suit, debate and controversy hath heretofore been, and may hereafter arise by means of ancient titles to lands derived from grants and patents by the governor of Virginia, the condition of which patents has not been performed, nor quit-rents paid, or the lands have been deserted by the first patentees or from or by reason of former en- tries or patents or grants in this government, etc., and for the prevention of the recur- rence of such troubles, and for quieting men’s estates an act was passed. In obedience to the above quoted order of the Queen an agreement was entered into between the two governors, Charles Eden and Alexan- -° der Spottswood, which was transmitted to England for the approbation of the King. This agreement was approved by the King in council, and also by the lord proprietors and returned to the governors to be exe- cuted. The agreement or “convention,” as Haywood calls it, was as follows: ‘That from the mouth of Currituck River, or Inlet, setting the compass on the north shore thereof, a due west line shall be run and fairly marked, and if it happen to cut Chowan River between the mouth of Nottaway River and Wiccacon Creek, then the same direct course shall be continued toward the mountains, and be ever deemed the divid- ing line between Virginia and North Carolina. But if the said west line cuts Chowan River to the southward of Wiccacon Creek, then from that point of intersection the bounds shall be allowed to continue up the mid- dle of the Chowan River to the middle of the entrance into said Wicca- con Creek, and from thence a due west line shall divide the two govern- ments. That if said west line cuts Blackwater River to the northward of Nottaway River, then from the point of intersection the bounds shall be allowed to be continued down the middle of said Blackwater River to the middle of the entrance into said Nottaway River, and from thence a due west line shall divide the two governments, etc.” Commissioners were appointed to carry this agreement or convention into effect, in accordance with following order: ‘At the court of St. James, the 28th day of March, 1727. Present the King’s Most Excel- lent Majesty in Council. * * His Majesty is hereupon pleased with the advice of his Privy Council to approve the said Proposals, * * * and to order, as it is hereby ordered, that the Governor or Commander-in-chief of our Colony in Virginia do settle the said bound- beHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. fate aries in conjunction with the Governor of North Carolina, agreeable to said Proposals.” The royal commission, so far as it regards Virginia, was in part as follows: “George II, by the Grace of God of Great Brit- ain, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, to our well- beloved William Byrd, Richard Fitz William and William Dandridge, Esqrs., members of our Council of the Colony and Dominion of Virginia, Greeting.” This commission was dated December 14,1727. The Caro- lina commission was dated February 21, 1728, and as that colony was under the government of the lord proprietors, the commission runs in their name: “Sir Richard Everard, Baronet, Governor, Captain, General and Commander-in-chief of the said Province: To Christopher Gale, Esqr., Chief Justice; John Lovick, Esqr., Secretary; Edward Mosely, Esqr., Surveyor General, and William Little, Esqr., Attorney General, Greeting: * * I, therefore, reposing especial confidence in yon, * to be Commissioners on the part of the true and absolute Lord Proprietors.” The commissioners thus appointed met at Currituck Inlet March 6, 1728, and after some disputes placed a cedar post on the north shore of Currituck Inlet, as their starting point. This point was found to be in north latitude thirty-six degrees and thirty-one minutes, and at that point the yariation of the compass was found to be very nearly three de- grees, one minute and two seconds west, Allowing for this variation they ran, as they supposed, a due west line, passing through the Dismal Swamp, and acquired, as Col. Byrd expresses 1t, ‘immortal reputation by being the first of mankind that ever ventured through the Dismal Swamp.” Upon arriving at Buzzard Creek about 169 miles westward from the Atlantic coast, the Carolina commissioners abandoned the work, October 5, 1728. Mr. FitzWilliam also abandoned the work atthe same time. Col. Byrd and Mr. Dandridge continued the line to a point on Peter’s Creek, a tributary of Dan River, near the Saura Towns, 241 miles and 30 poles from the coast, and there marked the termination of their work on a red oak tree, October 26, 1728. Col. Byrd wrote a delightful work entitled: ‘The History of the Dividing Line,” in which he records his disappointment at finding that the people along the border were de- Carolina side of the line, and though diseusted as disappointed, at this preference of the people, yet true to the generosity of his nature, he favored their wishes as far as his instructions would permit, and located the line about one mile north of thirty-six degrees and thirty-one minutes. In his history he says: “We constantly found the borderers laid it to heart, if their land was taken into Wirginia. They chose much rather to belong to Carolina, sirous of falling on the and indignant, as welleR i } j { i ei: SRST AP ier Rhvende ws ee oa ee eet ee OE fi \} i { 1) i eS ee —— ee Se re ree eZ, HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. where they pay no tribute to God or Cesar.” Col. Byid closes his nar- rative in the following language: ‘Nor can we by any means reproach ourselves of having put the Crown to any exorbitant expense in this difficult affair, the whole charge from beginning to end amounting to no more than £1,000. But let no one concerned in this painful Expedition complain of the scantiness of his pay, so long as his Majesty has been graciously pleased to add to our reward the Honour of his Royal appro- bation, and to declare, notwithstanding the Desertion of the Carolina Cominissioners, that the line by us run shall hereatter stand as the true Boundary betwixt the Governments of Virginia and North Carolina.” The next step in the history of this line was taken in 1749, when it was extended westward from Peter’s Creek, where Col. Byrd terminated his labors, to a point on Steep Rock Creek, a distance of eighty-eight miles. in all 329 miles from the coast. In this extension the commis- Boner on the part of Virginia were Joshua Fry, professor of mathe- matics in William and Mary College, and Peter Jefferson, father of Thomas Jefferson, afterward President of the United States; and on the part of North Carolina they were Daniel Weldon and William Churton. The line thus extended by these last commissioners was satisfactory, and remained the boundary between North Carolina and Virginia; and as by the treaty of Paris in 1763, the Mississippi River was fixed upon as the western boundary of North Carolina, it was hoped that that and the northern boundary line were established—the latter at thirty-six de- grees and thirty minutes. In 1779, urged by the necessities of the western settlements, the Legislatures of Virginia and North Carolina appointed a joint commission to extend the line westward between their respective territories. The commissioners on the part of North Carolina were Col. Richard Henderson and William B. Smith; and on the part of Virginia, Dr. Thomas Walker and Daniel Smith. These commissioners were instructed to begin the extension of the line where Fry and Jeffer- son, and Weldon and Churton ended their work; and if that were found to be truly in latitude thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes north, then to run due west from that point to the Tennessee or the Ohio River. If that point were found not to be truly in said latitude, then to run from the said place due north or due south into the said latitude and thence due west to the said Tennessee or Ohio River, correcting said course at due intervals by astronomical observations. The commissioners met early in September, 1779, but failed to find the point on Steep Rock Creek where Fry and Jefferson, and Weldon and Churton ended their line. The point of observation chosen, according to memoranda of agreement entered on the books of both parties, was Innorth latitude thirty-six degrees, thirty-one minutes and twenty-five | i seconds, and in west longitude eighty-one degrees and twelve minutes. ‘Al From this point they ran due south one mile, to a point supposed to be in latitude thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes. From this point they ran a line, as they Valley, when a disagreement occurred, and the two commissions separated. Each commission then ran a line independent of the other as far west as the Cumberland Mountain, the two lines being parallel with each other, and about two miles apart. The line run by the North Carolina commis- sioners, generally known as Henderson’s line, was north of that run by the Virginia commissioners, likewise generally known as Walker’s el | At the Cumberland Mountain the North Carolina commissioners aban- doned their work after sending in a protest against Walker’s line. The Virginia commissioners continued with their line to the Tennessee River, leaving, however, an unsurveyed gap from Deer Fork to the east crossing mn of Cumberland River, a distance estimated by them to be one hundred ! and nine miles. marked the termination of this line on the Mississippi River, but did not survey the intervening distance. The total length of the line thus far surveyed was as follows: Bryd’s line, 241 miles; Fry and Jefferson’s | line, 88 miles; Walker’s hne—from Steep Rock Creek to Deer Fork— ! 123% miles, unsurveyed line (estimated) 109 miles; from the east to the " west crossing of the Cumberland, 131 miles; and from the Cumberland to the Tennessee River, 94 miles; total distance from the Atlantic Ocean it to the Tennesse River, 702 miles. The commissioners were at Deer Fork November February 25, 1780; and at the Tennessee River March 23, following. Considerable disorder followed the running of these two lines, as be- tween them the authority of neither State was established; the validity H of process from neither State was acknowledged; entries for lands Fa tween the lines were made in both States; and both States issued grants i for the said lands. not be punished, and while no immediate action was taken by the two i States, yet such a dured, especially as by concert of action a remedy could be applied. Upon this subject the Governor of Virginia addressed a letter to the Legisla- ture of North Carolina, proposing that the line commonly called Walker's line be established as the boundary between the States; and that if that proposition were not satisfactory, they then would appoint commissioners it to meet commissioners to be appointed by North Carolina, empowered to fi, confer on the propriety of establishing either Walker’s or Henderson’s th HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. re 1%: & supposed, due west about forty-five miles, to Carter’s Although not authorized to do so, the commissioners 22, 1779; at the east crossing of the Cumberland Crimes committed on this disputed territory could condition of society between them could not be long en-174 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. sult of their conference to the Legislatures of line, and to report the re ferred by the Legislature of their respective States. This letter was re North Carolina to a committee of which Gen. November 2, and ending December 22, aa Thomas Person was ehair- eee ke Oe ie eg ey Sse wei uc man, at its session commencing 1789. The committee reported through Ge 1¢ and establishing Walker’s line as the boundary be- sage of a law confirm ‘ | tween the two States. Doubts arising as to the formality and sufliciency of this action of the Legislature, a second report was mace by the Carolina of which Gen. Person was again chairman, again ne m aS n, Person in favor of the pas- ee Seta eee Mx SBN OR ea pe EN ws ape pragma aS as =n oo AT I< RERSIT I = = - x ae committee on boundaries, recommending the confirming of VW alker’s 1 concurred in December 11, 1790, by both the > Learning of this action on the part gue nyiegteuneaytbraspapersciomenes line as the boundary line. This report was read ant House of Commons and the Senate. of North Carolina, the Legislature of Virginia passed an act on the 7th of December, 1791, declaring “That the line commonly called and known by the name of Walker’s line shall be, and the same is hereby declared Thus the boundary line, which ee ay Vat oa to be the boundary line of this State.”’ had so long been in controversy, Was regarded by both States as being finally settled. With reference to the direction of the line run by Mr. Walker and Mr. Smith it may here be stated that in consequence of failure to make due allowance for the variation of the needle, this lne continuously de- flected toward the north. This deflection was caused either by the im- perfection of their instruments or by the failure of the commissioners to test their work by a sufficient number of observations. Upon reaching the Tennessee River Walker’s line was more than twelve miles too far north in a direct line, being near latitude thirty-six degrees and forty minutes, and where it first touched the State of Tennessee it was near latitude thirty-six degrees and thirty-four minutes. With respect to the date of the first resolution confirming W alker’s line, it should here be noted that it was adopted practically on the 2d of November, 1789, as under the law of North Carolina all acts related to the first day of the session, and the act ceding the Western Terri- tory to the United States was passed at the same session of the Legisla- ture, and thus, therefore, on the same day. The deed executed to Con- oress, In pursuance of the cession act, was dated February 25, 1790, and was accepted April 2, 1790. The second resolution confirmatory of Ses SN OU Sea aa Wt Walker’s line was passed December 11, 1790. In 1792 William Blount, territorial governor of Tennessee, insisted that the first resolution of the Carolina Legislature, referred to above, was not a legal confirmation of Walker's line, and that the second reso- lution adopted December 11, 1790, having been passed many months Rae cca ewmiariacus — me =e paar 2 ee crowned ee alan aeHISTORY OF TENNESSER. 175 ° © 2 r T ‘NY » Ac a = u 7 A after the acceptance by Congress of the cession of the W estern Terri- tory, was invalid as to the United States, of which Tennessee was then a Territory. Gov. Blount also urged that for ten years previous to the cession North Carolina had exercised jurisdiction to Henderson’s line. and announced his intention of maintaining that jurisdiction. a ae = 176 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. yetween Virginia and Ten- , and the boundary | Although subse- tablished by @ compromise. quent negotiations have occurred, no change has been made, but in 1859 the line was re-marked by Samuel Milligan and George R. McClellan, and Leonidas Baugh and James C. Black, Virginia in the same year nessee was thus finally es commissioners for Tennessee, commissioners for Virginia. While this compromise line midway ablished boundary between e and Kentucky was Walker’s line. 1g the Walker line, the follow- he other commissioners from between Walker’s and Hender- gon’s lines became the est Tennessee and Vir- ginia, the boundary between Tennesse In the first Carolina resolution confirmi1 ing language was used: “Mr. Walker and t Virginia extended the line to the Tennessee R nation on the Mississipp1 from observations, Tennessee to that place unsurveyed.”’ The second resolution reafirmed. the first, and the Legislatures of both learly extending the line to the Mississippi River. Blount, above explained, repudi- iver and marked its term1- leaving the line from the States ratified the action of the commissioners, thus ¢ But the action of Tennessee under Gov. ating the Carolina and Virginia compact, was Se1Z in later years to reopen the boundary question as between her and Ten- As stated above Kentucky discovered that Walker’s line was and thirty minutes; the parallel ed upon by Kentucky nessee. several miles north of thirty-six degrees upon which it was designed to be run, and was desirous of readjusting the boundary on that parallel. ; “Since by your own showll and. North Carolina 1s invalid as to us, then we have aginary one of thirty-six degrees and thirty The logic of her argument in favor of this was irresistible: 1g the confirmation of Walk- er’s line by Virginia no dividing line except the 1 minutes. let us move down south and locate it.” In 1813 Kentucky passed an act in the preamble to which she inti- of the struggle, and her deter- ‘Whereas Tennes- mates her impatience at the continuance mination to find some effectual means of settling it: see proposes to depart from the true line of separation to be ascertained by correct and scientific observations, greeable necessity is imposed upon Kentucky of having the long-con- tested question finally settled by the means pointed out by the Constitu- tion of the United States.” The next step taken by Tennessee was No- vember 17, 1815, when an act was passed to which the following is the ete., the disa- preamble : WHEREAS, Some difficulty has existed between the State of Kentucky and this State and whereas it is essential to the harmony and interest of both States that the line ae monly called Walker’s line heretofore considered and acted on as the boundary between them should be established as the boundary between the two States, therefore be it en-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ie fe7 ‘acted that the line commonly called Walker’s line be, and the same is hereby established and confirmed as the true boundary between the States of Kentucky and Tennessee.”’ Sec. 5. Bet enacted that if the Legislature of Kentucky shall refuse to pass such an act as the above, then this act shall cease to be in force, etc. In response to this proposition on the part of Tennessee, Kentucky passed an act on the 10th of February, 1816, in which she declines ‘to accept the line proposed, but offers to adopt “ Walker’s line so far as it was originally run and marked, to wit: From a point near the mouth of Obed’s, alias Obey’s River to the Tennessee River, as the true jurisdictional line between this State and the State of Tennessee, and as to the residue of the line between the two States, the following shall be adopted as the true position thereof: At the eastern extremity of Walker’s line near the mouth of Obed’s River aforesaid, a line shall be run at right angles either north or south, as the case may require, till it reaches the true chartered limits of the two States in the latitude of thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes north, and from that point the line shall be extended to the sast, still keeping the same latitude till it reaches the eastern boundary of this State; and at the west extremity of Walker’s line, to wit, the Ten- nessee River, a line shall be extended up or down the said river as the case may require till it reaches the true chartered latitude thirty-six de- orees and thirty minutes north, and from that point the line shall be ex- tended due west, still keeping the same latitude till it reaches the Missis- sippi River.” Had this proposition been accepted by Tennessee about 180 miles of the boundary line would have been placed on the “‘chartered latitude,” thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes; but Tennessee could be satisfied with nothing short of Walker’s line, or at least with very hittle less than that line as her northern boundary, and in order to show her insistence on that line passed an act, after reciting the customary preamble, “that the line commonly called Walker’s line, so far as the same has been run and marked, shall be considered and taken to be the true line between the States.”’ Sac. 2. That as soon as the State of Kentucky shall pass a law agreeing thereto, a direct line from the eastern extremity of the line called Walker’s line, as marked at Cum- berland River, to Walker’s line at a place called Cumberland Gap, shall be considered and taken the true line between the States. Sno. 3. That this State will, provided the State of Kentucky agree thereto, apply to the Executive of the United States to appoint a commissioner to ascertain the true point where the boundary line between this State and the State of Kentucky will strike the Ten- nessee River on the western bank thereof, and that from that point a line shall be run di- rectly west to the western boundary of the State of Tennessee, which shall be the line bounding the two States. This persistence on the part of Tennessee in affirming what she con-Seeereineepecailnniaend Py FY b| a Wh te fi i ae SBT f i 5 aa aap aEaLnantigemanmeoe = | i iY et : LEER ali ite fi iil a i CH ae rs 1 ity t Te bin | Le Tal ie tm} ae UE ry sh GK f Le ven r i 3 Ly ' 7 at ry ley hai a i if Be He hh if Hy Bie i ' a Viet e oe Lani i ti ie ay Hi ‘ ah ann & ; hia @ , i ' } eal Aah iit b WE i HN [ ; LEE bPiaaa & Se om Sa — MO Se ES ge eee en en + Ce esa 178 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ably nettled her sister State, who re- sidered to be her right, consider by the following “spicy en- plied to this proposal on January 30, 1815, actment.” Be it enacted that all laws heretofore passed by the General Assembly of this com- monwealth relative to the boundary line between this State and Tennessee shall be, and the same are hereby repealed. Src. 2. That the southern boundary | line running west from the top of Cumberl 80’ north latitude, anything in any former law p withstanding. ine of this State shall be and remain on & and Mountain to the Mississippi River in 36° assed by this State to the contrary not- In pursuance of this enactment Kentucky, in 1819, sent her surveyors Alexander and Munsell to run and mark the line on thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes between the Tennessee and Mississippi Rivers, and declared this to be the true boundary. This line struck the Tennessee River about twelve miles in a direct line south of Walker’s line, and if it had been continued on eastward it would have passed about two miles to the south of Clarksville. Jt was now evident to Tennessee that her territorial integrity was in danger, and that decided steps must be taken if she would not lose to a large extent in property and population. She realized her own illogical position in claiming jurisdiction to a line the validity of which as a boundary she had solemnly repudiated. She could not rest quietly in possession, for she plainly saw that Kentucky intended to have the boundary question settled, and to extend her southern line down to the ‘“‘chartered limits” of the State, thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes; the latitude in which Walker’s line was supposed to be run. It was necessary to find some plea by which she could still plausibly maintain her right to Walker’s line as actually run as her northern boundary. This plea was supplied by Gov. Joseph McMinn in his mes- sage of October 6, 1819, and 1t was the only plea which Tennessee could bring to her aid, the desire of the people residing on the belt of territory between the “chartered limits,” and Walker’s line, to remain under the jurisdiction of Tennessee. He admitted that Alexander & Munsell’s line, if it were in fact in latitude thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes, should be allowed to stand. The necessity of this compromise was forced upon Tennessee by her being estopped from pleading the confirming of Walker’s line by the Virginia and Carolina compact which under Gov. William Blount she had repudiated. The Legislature of Tennessee having thus failed to establish her claim by enactments determined to send commissioners to the Kentucky Legislature and try the efficacy of a jointcommission. Kentucky though opposed to that method of settling the question, was at length persuaded by Tennessee’s commissioners, Felix Grundy and William L. Brown, toHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 179 appoint a commission, selecting John J. Crittenden and Robert Trimble. Notwithstanding the fact that Kentucky’s argument as to abstract title was unanswerable, yet the Tennessee commissioners successfully urged actual possession, and the desires of the people, together with the multi- tude of hardships that must necessarily result from a change, and offered to permit all the lines to remain as then located including Alexander & Munsell’s line. The compromise was accepted by Kentucky, and effected February 2, 1820. According to this compromise the boundary line was to be Walker’s line to the Tennessee River; thence up and with said river to Alexander & Munsell’s line; thence with said line to the Missis- sippi River—the treaty to be valid when ratified by the Legislature of Kentucky. Thus the main points were finally settled, but still for some years numerous Inconveniences continued to develop from the loss of some of the landmarks of Walker’s line. the uncertainty regarding others. and the unsurveyed gap, between Deer Fork and the Cumberland River. In 1821, this gap unsurveyed by Walker, was surveyed by a joint com- mission consisting of William Steele, on the part of Kentucky, and Ab- salom Looney, on the part of Tennessee, and they extended their survey from the east crossing of Cumberland River to Cumberland Gap. On November 13, 1821, Tennessee passed an act confirming this survey as far as 1t extended, including in the act a minute description of the survey, and on the 22d of the same month Kentucky confirmed this line. In 1831 James Bright, commissioner for Tennessee, and Dr. Mun- sell, commissioner for Kentucky, ran and marked Walker’s line along the southern borders of Allen, Simpson and Trigg Counties straight from the point near the west crossing of the Cumberland River to the Tenn- essee. This survey, if adopted, would have thrown into Kentucky a strip of land about a mile wide which is now a portion of Tennessee. In 1845 Gov. James C. Jones appointed, as commissioners on the part of Tennessee, C. W. Nance and William P. McLain, who met Messrs. Wilson and Duncan, commissioners from Kentucky, in October of that year, and marked a line along the borders of Trigg and Christian Coun- ties, and along that portion of Fulton County west of Reelfoot Lake. These different lines were all readjusted in 1859, by a joint commission consisting of Benjamin Peeples and O. R. Watkins, commissioners; O. H. P. Bennett, engineer; J. Trafton, L. Burnett, assistant engineers, and J. M. Nicholson, surveyor, on the part of Tennessee; and Austin P. Cox and C. M. Driggs, commissioners; J. Pillsburg, engineer; G. Trafton, G. Stealey and A. Hensly, assistant engineers, on the part of Kentucky. They met at a place called Compromise, on the Mississippi River, and improved instruments made an accurate and satisfactory survey, havingbie Ve amet bE Bhs mental wah { ¢ Veh ea ; , he iH eo A; ee ety ; ape! a6 meet ; Pa epee FY ae Hil Peat Ba} a. Me lh t aa ae Hht HH is vey i E he i fe Opa | \ enw ce RHE PEL | ait ; fi aea { t | be aa mat |, 5 ; Lehae ‘ LI } : i +h rip PNY bP iyi heli mal): , cn HH | . ee a ih ; i ie el aa ( PRE Hn Bi vi tl | | Pik eel gine i Babi ' , fare i i Tale f Hi Hae | Fea) ean! Bead Rhaatny Hf ie il nha ea :4 i ine | a aa ae Ree Pe ae ee Ph iatne \ ei ta iy alae all tin { Hal PP eu a a Pia tas yee 7 fF hei hii if We a} | ithe i} Wee Pe PP eit a bya ia | | IH} ae ra fh i} a ‘at Pe Ih pale f i | } {AER i Nt i a | tl) 2 eh 1 Let Ph ik Hee h a | ee yl i: if | a: bel a i i Mt dit ai | Pa Pe ie aid Pe ue Maan aay eR eae a 13 tar We : Hi Haat i eae ft RAE PN ; HY ial Mit Y yy (eal | j ; een Hit) : Gary Bihar Bl le es Vel ne ai a An a mele Wh wy Piet i He 4 ; : i niet Tp i : hy.) Lie HH ; CR ae BY 7 I aren Se Se ST 180 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. as required and marking the line on permanent trees ‘rd the east and toward the west. in latitude thirty-six degrees, twenty hundredths seconds, they followed very nearly he Tennessee, in latitude thirty- fty-four seconds. Thence they h is very nearly in latitude placing the stones with four chops tow: From Compromise, and fifty-five and seven along Alexander and Munsell’s line to t -nine minutes twenty-nine minutes and fi e to Walker’s line, whic 1 forty-five seconds, and from this six degrees, ran down the ‘T'ennesse thirty-six degrees, forty minutes an ne point they followed Walker’s line to the southeastern corner of Kentucky, latitude thirty-six degrees, thirty-four minutes and fifty-three anc forty- eiaht hundredths seconds. yoint they ran to the southwest eight | corner of Virginia in latitude thirty six This survey cost Tennessee TOD Oe Kentucky ap- From this } degrees, thirty-six minutes and ninety-two hundredths seconds. and Kentucky $99 630.07. The stone posts eost $1,260. proved the acts of this joint commission February 23, 1860, and Ten- nessee March 21, 1360. Thus atter a protracted, and in many instances a Tennessee finally established her title, vexatious contro- versy, lasting from 1792 to 1860, if not her right, to that strip of territory extending from White Top Mountain to the Tennessee River. about 110 miles long, and averages about seven miles about 245 miles long, and about five and That portion adjoining Virginia 1s in width, while that adjoining Kentucky is three-quarters miles wide at its eastern extremity, ora .ches the Tennessee, where it 1s about twelve and one- lually increasing in width until it rez half miles wide. he is indebted first to the failure of the Virginia For this acquisition S allowance for the variation of and Carolina commissioners to make due the needle: second, to the fidelity and ability of her public servants; third, to the preference of the people along the border to remain within her jurisdiction, and fourth, to the liberality of Kentucky and Virginia, which led them to respect the preferences of the people. And for the loss of the strip west of the Tennessee and between the ‘‘chartered limits” and Walker’s line, she is indebted to the repudiation by Gov. Blount, of the Virginia and Carolina compact. And yet, although this struggle which lasted so long and had attracted so much attention, was settled thus in 1860, her constitution of 1870 adheres to the old imaginary lines, atid describes her northern boundary as thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes, but this careless description is well guarded by the following clause: “Provided that the limits and jurisdiction of this State shall ex- tend to any other land and territory now acquired by compact or agree- ment with other States or otherwise, although such land and territory are not included within the boundaries hereinbefore designated.”’HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 181 The history of the southern boundary line of this State is not of such absorbing interest, nor fortunately so long as that above detailed. Quoting again from the Declaration of Rights: “That line and that only should be esteemed the southern boundary of this State (North Carolina ) as follows, that is to say: Beginning on the sea-side at a cedar stake at or near the mouth of Little River, being the southern extremity of Bruns- wick County and runs thence a northwest course through the Boundary House, which stands in thirty-three degrees and fifty-six minutes, to thirty-five degrees north latitude. and from thence a west course, so far as is mentioned in the charter of King Charles IL to the late proprietors of Carolina.” This declaration was adopted in December, 1776, and shows that the parallel of thirty-five degrees north latitude was consid- ered as the established southern boundary line of North Carolina westward from the point where the line “running a northwest course through the Boundary House” if extended would intersect that parallel. To establish the line between North and South Carolina, commissioners ted by both these colonies in 1737. ‘Those of the former were appoin Matthew Rowan. and Edward Mosely. colony were Robert Hilton, at the cedar stake on the sea shore by the mouth of Little thirty-fitth degree. At ted a light wood stake They began River, and ran the line until they arrived at the the termination of the northwest line they eree upon a mound. ‘The line was continued by private parties twenty miles, and in 1764 was still further extended. In 1818 the boundary between ‘Te lished. The commissioners appointed Joseph These parties arrived at Ross’ in the nnessee and Georgia was estab- Cobb surveyor, and two chain carriers and two markers. 15th of May. From Ross’, which was on the ded to Nickajack, where on the next day appointed by Georgia. ‘The Cherokee nation on the Tennessee River, they procee they met the commissioners and surveyor d that the thirty-fitth degree of north latitude es from the south bank of the Tennes- due south from near the center of the town of Nickajack. This point was supposed by them to be the corner of the States of Georgia and Ala- At this point they caused a rock to be erected, two feet high, four bama. inches thick and fifteen inches broad. engraved on the north side ‘¢ June 1, 1818, Var. six degrees and forty-five minutes east,” and on the south side “Geo, Lat. thirty-five degrees north, J. Carmack.” From this rock they ran the line due east to the top of the Unaka Mountains, where they closed their survey with a variation of the compass of five degrees and thirty minutes; the length of the line surveyed being nearly 110 miles. 1° a , Ss : ge A fen At ee The line west of Nickajack was extended 1m part by Gen. Coftee and the joint commission decide was one mile and twenty-eight pol SEC,ees TRE on _ ee * : ee a 7 aimee, Seeienpan penance Saigpeearanara as : eee ‘ iy OME, | Seat ue Wie | | un ae thd t * nay bh] rat Ea A tt HH Pa Adi bie eid fl Pet PA ' lui i a | I WB} i i ‘and by Mississippl February | 182 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The boundary line between Tennessee and residue by Gen. Winchester. hompson, and his line was adopted Mississippi was also run by John T Sunes by Tennessee as the southern boundary, but Mississipp1 failed to adopt. it. The question was finally settled by Tennessee November 9, 1837, 8. 1838, on which dates the two States, respectively, ratified the proceedings of a joint commission to run the true boundary line. The history of the running of the line is sufficiently shown in the language of the act by the Tennessee Legislature above re- ferred to as follows: WuHeErkas the State of Tennessee believing the southern boundary line of the State dividing Tennessee from Mississippi was not correctly run by the commissioners in 1819, with the thirty-fifth parallel of north latitude; and whereas the State of Tennessee, by an act passed November 29, 1833, did establish what is known as Thompson’s line as the southern boundary of the State, which act did not receive the sanction of the State of Mississippi; and whereas the authorities of Tennessee and Mississippi having recently by commissioners on the part of the two States, run and marked another line which is agreed upon providing they ratify the same, which line is described in the commissioners’ report as follows: Commencing at a point on the west bank of the Tennessee River, sixty-four chains south or above the mouth of Yellow Creek and about three-fourths of a mile north of the line known as Thompson’s line, and twenty-six chains and ten links north of Thompson’s line at the basis meridian of the Chickasaw surveys, and terminating ata point in the east bank of the Mississippi River, opposite Cow Island, sixteen chains north of Thompson’s line; therefore Be it enacted, etc., That the line as run and marked between this State and Mississippr by B. A. Ludlow,D. W. Connely and W. Petrie (commissioners on the part of Mississippi), and John D. Graham and Austin Miller (commissioners on the part of Tennessee) be and the same is hereby declared to be the true southern boundary of the State of Tennessee, being 85° north latitude, and that the jurisdiction of the State be extended to that line in as full and ample a manner as the same was extended to the line run by Winchester. The eastern boundary line, or that between Tennessee and North Car- olina, was finally established by an act passed by the Legislature of the former State during the session commencing November 19, 1821, the language of the act running somewhat as follows: That the dividing line run and marked by Alexander Smith, Isaac Allen and Simeon Perry, com- missioners on the part of Tennessee, and James Mebane, Montford Stokes and Robert Love, commissioners from North Carolina, which line begins at a stone set up on the north side of the Cataloochee Turnpike Road and marked on the west side ‘‘ Tenn. 1821,” and on the east side “N. C. 1821,” and running along the summit of the Great Smoky Mountains, etc., etc., and striking the southern boundary line twenty-three poles west of a tree in said line marked ‘‘72 M,” where was set up by said commissioners a square post, marked on the west side “Tenn. 1821.” and on the east side “‘ N. C. 1821” and on the south side “@G@.” be and the same is hereby ratified, confirmed and established as the true boundary line between this State and North Carolina. This line was confirmed by.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 183. the Legislature of North Carolina during the session commencing No- vember 19, 1821. THE WATAUGA ASSOCIATION. The settlers on the Watauga and Holston, though very near the boundaries of Virginia and North Carolina, and though most of them were emigrants from the latter State, were living without the protection -of the laws of either. Being thus without regular government, it was necessary for them to adopt for themselves rules for their own guidance. These rules were adopted in 1772, and are believed to have constituted the first written compact of government west of the mountains. The government was simple and moderate, paternal and patriarchal, summary and firm. The settlers elected as commissioners thirteen citizens, as fol- lows: John Carter, Charles Robertson, James Robertson, Zachariah Is- bell. John Sevier, James Smith, Jacob Brown, William Bean, John Jones, George Russell, Jacob Womack, Robert Lucas and William Tatham. Of these thirteen commissioners five were appointed as a court, by whom all matters in controversy were settled, and the same tri- bunal had entire control of everything pertaining to the public good. This court was composed, it 1s believed, of the following persons: John Carter, Charles Robertson, James Robertson, Zachariah Isbell and John Sevier, with William Tatham as clerk. For a number of years this form of government performed its functions with success and satisfaction But at length dissensions arose, and the result of these to the people. asthe establishment of the State. various views and desires of the people w of Franklin, as detailed later in this chapter. After the establishment of the Watauga Association, the Govern- ment of the Notables was the next in the order of time. This was on the banks of the Cumberland, as that was on the banks of the Watauga. It grew up trom the necessities of the people, far removed from any pro- tecting government. Robertson’s principal colony arrived at the French January I, 1780—Putnam says December 25, 1779. John ed April 24, 1780, and on May 1 following, the ere entered into by Lick about Donelson’s party arrlv overnment or articles of agreement W Tt was stated in the chapter on the set- tlement of the territory, that in the vicinity of the French Lick there and when the government came to be established, “Tribunal of Nota- compact of g the settlers on the Cumberland. were eight stations, each station was entitled to representatives in the bles”? as follows: Nachboroucht (atuNashville)s: ceric) sci: occ cools sale cas : Mansker’s (Casper Mansker’s VAiGls) so oslo see eke Cece incr) ecole 2 Bledsoe’s (now Castilian Springs)... ..:-+-+e5+° EE aeHl Bi ee lay { cn i ; i a | Pen Ran te i aah ee ai il ' al rE Biihaeeh! ' TB eee Nt By BRR buh Bee Ei | ; Sieaiialsi ht 7 i i te Heel! rh hee He BR RRA E i Phe at us bey it} HTS eee or Rh hy hil a der aay: i BERRA EI IE ‘ 1 F ih eee ie & tk | | +) EG REPO bI 4 foie | | | ee be Pee RIL Phe ea 5 OE REE ‘ t fi f i it ree bea Te eheheall ae | iy et Hp i i i By | hte f ri ay) Le | ad by Pt; Hint z | Hoel I ida lf ge ij aa i Mi Hah Bh : Pee ‘ a : teil i ht He | ri tae att He ie Ee id ans Bey bert al Paty daha, et | 3 | A eRe Hin El ene itt iwi at he Vee pial Lhe WREUEARA | EL AEE CAT | \ MERE £ ene lt | f fee wa tas adel § thay Bill | HR EL BH Fi i RENEW) b % f it ; ie Pe tay i Pet | Dae a Phd a) } th il eR | RGR E i PPR A! | t 1 i ' ie i | H Pe nee RH! & tit Rt ae ae eM aT REA F ‘ HT | ' th, 184 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Neherns (station Gamp) Creek) icc .-- see soe t sous oc oe eicicha as 1 Freeland’s (at Dr. McGavock’s or Horticultural Garden). .........+... 1 Maton MowabLoOklym) samc elelsle cc ce sinrenircienre ccc oot cisato 2 Fort Union (where Haysborough Was)...-.---+-+essecsrtrre ttt cero Stone’s River (west of the Hermitage)........-+--- These representatives, or a majority of them, after being bound by the solemnity of an oath to do equal and impartial justice between all contending parties, were empowered and made competent to settle all controversies relative to location and improvements of lands; all other matters and questions of dispute among the settlers; protecting the rea- sonable claims of those who may have returned for their families; pro- viding implements of husbandry and food for such as might arrive with- out such necessaries; making especial provisions for widows and orphans whose husbands or fathers may die or be killed by the Indians; guaran- teeing equal rights, mutual protection and impartial justice; pledging themselves most solemnly and sacredly to promote the peace, happiness and well being of the community, to suppress vice and punish crime. In this compact one of the principal elements of popular government was expressly set forth, viz.: the right of the people at the various stations to remove their representative or judge, or other officers, for misconduct or unfaithfulness in the discharge of their duties, and to elect others to fill the vacancies. ‘This tribunal exercised the prerogatives of government to their fullest extent, with the exception of the infliction of capital pun- ishment. They called out the militia of the stations to ‘repel or pursue the enemy; impressed horses for such service as the public exigency might demand; levied fines, payable in money or provisions ; adjudicated causes; entered up judgments and awarded executions; granted letters of administration upon estates of deceased persons, taking bonds ‘payable to Col. James Robertson, chairman of committee,” ete. Following are the articles of agreement, or compact of government, entered into by the settlers on the Cumberland River May 1, 1780. The first page is lost and the second torn and defaced, but there can be read distinctly as follows, supplying in brackets lost words: - * property of right shall be determined as soon [as] conveniently may be in the following manner: The free men of this country over the age [of twenty] ann eye shall immediately,or as soon as may [be convenient],proceed to elect or nhac Paice anne scientious and [deserving] persons from or out of the different sections, that is [to] say: From Nashborough, three; Mansker’s, two; Bledsoe’s, one; Asher’s, one; Stone’s Rivi ae Freeland’s, one; Eaton’s, two; Fort Union, one. Which said persons, or a majority of them, after being bound by the solemnity of an oath, to do equal and impartial Gustice be- tween all contending parties, according to their best skill and judgment, having due recard to the regulations of the land office herein established, shall be competent judges of ane matter, and hearing the allegations of both parties and [their] witnesses as to the facts alleged or otherwise as to the truth of the case, shall have [power] toHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 185 determine who is of right entitled to an entry for such land so in | be forever binding against the future And the entry taker * tending decide controversies, and dispute, when said determination or decision shal claim of the party against whom such judgment [shall be rendered]. shall make a [record thereof] in his book accordingly, and the entry * i * fit had never been made, and the Jand in dispute party so cast shall be . eS ee * in case a * * to the person in whose favor such judgment shall of the death, removal, or absence of any of the judges so to be chosen, or their refusing to act, the station to which such person or persons belong, or was chosen from, shall proceed to elect another, or others, in his or their stead, which person, or persons, SO chosen, after being sworn, as aforesaid, to do equal and impartial justice, shall have full power and au- thority to proceed to business, and act in all disputes respecting the premises as if they had been originally chosen at the first election. That the entry book shall be kept fair and open by * * _ person tr toe appointed by said Richard Henderson * * * chose, and every entry for land num- hereduand dated apG) > * order without leaving any blank leaves or spaces *, - * to the inspection of the said twelve judges, or * * of them at all times. That many persons have come to this country without implements of husbandry, and turn without making a crop, and [intend] re- fall, or early next spring, and it * such should : a * of such places as they may have chosen. * ene s * be taken for all such, for as much land as they are entitled to from their head-rights, which said lands shall be reserved for the particular person in whose name they shall be entered, or their heirs, provided such all remove to this country and take possession of the respective place or piece of ntered, or shall send a laborer, or laborers, and a white person in his or her stead to perform the first day of May, in the year one thousand seven hundred and eighty-one, and also provided such land so chosen and entered for is not entered and claimed by some person who is an inhabitant, and shall raise a crop of corn the present year at some station or place convenient to the general settlement in this country. But it is fully to be understood that those who are actually at this time inhab- itants of this country shall not be debarred of their choice or claim on account of the right of any such absent or returning person or persons. It is further proposed and agreed that no claim or title to any lands whatsoever shall be set up by any person in consequence of any mark or former improvement, unless the same be entered with the entry taker within twenty days from the date of this association and agreement; and that when any person hereafter shall mark or improve land or lands for himself, such mark or improvement shall not avail him or be deemed an evidence of prior right, unless the same be entered with the entry taker in thirty days) = * from the time of such mark or improvement, but no other person shall be entitled to sforesaid to be reserved * * conse- quence of any purchase gift, or otherwise. That if the entry taker to be appointed shall neglec or be found by said j udges, or a majority of them, to have acted fraudulently, to the prej- udice of any person whatsoever, such entry taker shall be ‘mmediately removed from his office, and the book taken out of his possession by the said judges, until another be ap- pointed to act in his room. That as often as the people in ge chosen, they may call a ne ng due respect to the number n shall have the same power W from other circumstances are obliged to re moving out this os * yeason have the pre-emption purpose of residence, therefore it is persons sh land so chosen or e same, on or before the such lands so as é t or refuse to perform his duty, ith the doings of the judges neral are dissatisfied Ww id stations and elect w election at any of the sa now to be elected at each station, ith those in whose room or or triers so to be others in their stead, havi which persons so to be chose place they shall or may be ch That as no consideration claim of the said Richard Henderson and Company, cjation, is demanded or expected by the said company, so we think it reasonable and just th the price proposed by the said Ric osen to act. money for the lands on Cumberland River, within the and which is the subject of this asso- until a satisfactory and indisputa- ble title can be made, at the £26, 13s. 4d. current money per hundred acres, hard Henderson, shall be: a aei ee > - aT A cain eta rae 7 an gah es e - > 2 es ae = .. Peres = x. nie es ae 1 * ——. a ee veciess are: ae Cc t™ x = = Se ET —_ - rr nen ole = Skea ae = =e : = = = = ey 3 = =a = : = = Se Ee ee rane Se a pean ae as i ge an! = = 186 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. paid according to the value of money on the first day of January last, being the time when the price was made public, and settlement encouraged thereon by said Henderson, and the said Richard Henderson on his part does hereby agree that in case of the risé or appreciation of money from that “ os i an abatement shall be made in the sum according to its raised or appreciated value. . That where any person shall remove to this country with intent to become an in- habitant and depart this life, either by violence or in the natural way, before he shall have performed the requisites necessary to obtain lands, the child or children of such de- ceased person shall be entitled, in his or her room, to such quantity of land as such person would have been entitled to in case he or she had lived to obtain a grant in their own name; and if such death be occasioned by the Indians the said Henderson doth promise and agree that the child or children shall have as much as amounts to their head-rights gratis, surveyor’s and other incidental fees excepted, 7 AND WHEREAS, from our remote situation and want of proper offices for the admin- istration of justice, no regular proceedings at law can be had for the punishment of of- fenses and attainment of right, it is therefore agreed that until we can be relieved by Government from the many evils and inconveniences arising therefrom, the judges or triers to be appointed as before directed when qualified shall be and are hereby declared a proper court or jurisdiction for the recovery of any debt or damages; or where the cause of action or complaint hasarisen, or hereafter shall commence for anything done or to be done among ourselves, within this our settlement on Cumberland aforesaid, or in our pas- sage hither, where the laws of our country could not be executed. or damages repaired in any other way; that is to say, in all cases where the debt or damages or demand does or shall not exeeed one hundred dollars, any three of the said judges or triers shall be competent to make acourt, and finally decide the matterin controversy; but if foralarger sum, and either party shall be dissatisfied withthe judgment or decision of such court, they may have an appeal to the whole twelve judges or triers, in which case nine members shall be deemed a full court, whose decision, if seven agree in one opinion, the matter in dispute shall be final, and their judgment carried into execution in such manner, and by such person or persons as they may appoint, and the said courts, respectively, shall have full power to tax such costs as they may think just and reasonable, to be levied and collected with the debt or damages so to be awarded. . And it is further agreed that a majority of said jadges, or triers, or general arbitra- tors shall have power to punish in their discretion, having respect to the laws of our coun- try, all offenses against the peace, misdemeanors, and those criminal or of a capital nature provided such court does not proceed with execution so far as to affect life or member; and in case any should be brought before them whose crime is or Shall be dangerous to the State, or for which the benefit of clergy is taken away by law, and sufficient evidence or proof of the fact or facts can probavly be made, such courts, or a majority of the mem- bers, shall and may order and direct him, her, or them to be safely bound and sent under a strong guard to the place where the offense was or shall be committed, or where legal trial of such offense can be had, which shal] accordingly be done, and the reasonable ex- pense attending the discharge of this duty ascertained by the court, and paid by the in- habitants in such proportion as shall be hereafter agreed on for that purpose. That as this settlement is in its infancy, unknown to government, and not included in any county within North Carolina, the State to which it belongs, so as to derive the advantayes of those wholesome and salutary laws for the protection and benefits of its cit- izens, we find ourselves constrained from necessity to adopt this temporary method of resiraining the licentious, and supplying, by unanimous consent, the blessings flowing from a just and equitable government, declaring and promising that no action or com- plaint shall be hereafter instituted or lodged in any court of record within this State or elsewhere, for anything done or to be done in consequence of the proceedings of the said judges or general arbitrators so to be chosen and established by this our association. That the well-being of this country entirely depends, under Divine Providence, on unanimity of sentiment and concurrence in measures, and as clashing interests and opin-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 187 ions without being under some restraint will most certainly produce confusion, discord and almost certain ruin, so we think it our duty to associate and hereby form ourselves into one society for the benefit of present and future settlers, and until the full and proper exercise of the laws of our country can be in use, and the powers of government exerted among us, we do solemnly and sacredly declare and promise each other that we will faith- fully and punctually adhere to, perform and abide by this our association, and at all times, if need be, compel by our united force a due obedience to these our rules and regulations. In testimony whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names, in token of our entire approbation of the measures adopted. The following additional resolutions were adopted and entered into at Nashborough, May 31, 1780: That all young men over the age of sixteen years, and able to perform militia duty, shall be considered as having a full right to enter for and obtain lands in their own names as if they were of full age; and in that case not be reckoned in the family of his father, mother or master so as to avail them of any land on their account. That when any person shall mark or improve land or lands, with intent to set up a claim thereto, such person shall write or mark in legible characters the initial letters of his name at least, together with the day of the month and year on which he marked or improved the same at the spring or most notorious part of the land, on some convenient tree or other durable substance, in order to notify his intention to all such as may inquire or examine: and in case of dispute with respect to priority of right, proof of such trans- action shall be made by the oath of some indifferent witness, or no advantage or benefit shall be derived from such mark or improvement; and in all cases where priority of mark or occupancy cannot be ascertained according to the regulations and prescriptions herein proposed and agreed to, the oldest or first entry in the office to be opened in consequence of this association shall have the preference, and the lands granted accordingly. It is further proposed and agreed that the entry office shall be opened at Nash- borough on Friday, the 19th of May, instant, and kept from thenceforward at the same place unless otherwise directed by any future convention of the people in general or their representatives. That the entry taker shall and may demand and receive twelve dollars for each entry to be made in his book, in manner before directed, and shall give a certificate thereof if required; and also may take the same fee for every caveat or counter-claim to any lands before entered; and in all cases where a caveat is to be tried in manner before directed, the entry book shall be laid before the said committee of judges, triers, or general arbi- trators, for their inspection and information, and their judgment upon the matter in dis- pute fairly entered as before directed; which said court or committee is also to keep a fair and distinct journal or minutes of all their proceedings, as well with respect to lands as other matters which may come before them in consequence of these our resolutions. It is also firmly agreed and resolved that no person shall be admitted to make an entry for any lands with the said entry taker, or permitted to hold the same, unless such person shall subscribe his name and conform to this our Association, Confederacy and General Government, unless it be for persons who have returned home, and are permitted to have lands reserved for their use until the first day of May next, in which case entries may be made for such absent persons according to the true meaning of this writing, without their personal presence, but shall become utterly void if the particular person or persons for whom such entry shall be made should refuse or neglect to perform the same as soon as conveniently may be after their return, and before the said first day of May, 1781. Whereas, The frequent and dangerous incursions of the Indians and almost daily mas- sacre of some of our inhabitants renders it absolutely necessary for our safety and defense that due obedience be paid to our respective officers elected and to be elected at the sev- eral stations or settlements to take command of the men or militia at such fort or station, It is further agreed and resolved that when it shall be adjudged necessary and expe dient by such commanding officer to draw out the militia of any fort or station to pursuePs a rigor - FORT a aa ee ae ATO ODO eee ES ae ae Tl ee ee emp aaa Sa aS % * SE ee A - EN cae i ct a ena eee rt aeaemmaclcans SSeS ~ 188 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. or repulse the enemy, the said officer shall have power to call out such and so many of his men ashe may judge necessary, and in case of disobedience may inflict such fine as he in his discretion shall think just and reasonable, and also may impress the horse or horses of any person or persons whomsoever, which, if lost or damaged in such service, shall be paid for by the inhabitants of such fort or station in such manner and such proportion as the Committee hereby appointed, or a majority of them, shall direct and order; but if any person shall be aggrieved, or think himself unjustly vexed and injured by the fine or fines so imposed by his officer or officers, such person may appeal to the said Judges or Com- mittee of General Arbitrators, who, or a majority of them, shall have power to examine the matter fully and make such order therein as they may think just and reasonable, which decision shall be conclusive on the party complaining as well as the officer or officers inflicting such fine; and the money arising from such fines shall be carefully applied for the benefit of such fort or station in such manner as the said Arbitrators shall hereafter direct. It is lastly agreed and firmly resolved that a dutiful and humble address or petition be presented by some person or persons to be chosen by the inhabitants, to the General As- sembly, giving the fullest assurance of the fidelity and attachment to the interest of our country and obedience to the laws and Constitution thereof; setting forth that we are confident our settlement is not within the boundaries of any nation or tribe of Indians, as some of us know and all believe that they have fairly sold and received satisfaction for the land or territories whereon we reside, and therefore we hope we may not be consid- ered as acting against the laws of our country or the mandates of government. That we do not desire to be exempt from the ratable share of the public expense of the present war, or other contingent charges of government. That we are, from our remote situation, utterly destitute of the benefit of the laws of our country, and exposed to the depredations of the Indians, without any justifiable or effectual means of embodying our militia, or defending ourselves against the hostile attempts of ourenemy; praying and imploring the immediate aid and protection of government, by erecting a county to in- clude our settlements; appointing proper officers for the discharge of public duty; taking into consideration our distressed situation with respect to Indians, and granting such relief and assistance as in wisdom, justice and humanity may be thought reasonable. Nashborough, 138th May, 1780. To these articles of agreement 250 persons signed their names, all of whom could write but one, James Patrick, who made his mark. No ree- ords of the government of the Notables have been discovered by any his- torian, for the reason, doubtless, that few, if any, were made. Putnam to whom this, as well as other histories, is largely indebted for its account of this government on the Cumberland says on this point: “After the organization of the primitive government on May-day, 1780, down to January, 1783, we have no records, not even a fugitive scrap or sheet, of which that ready clerk, Andrew Ewin, was usually so careful. The peo- ple were so greatly exposed and kept in such constant alarm, some leay- ing, and many agitating the propriety or possibility of remaining, all admitting that their perils were imminent and were likely so to continue for an indefinite period, that we may presume there were no regular os , . S . 2 meetings of the judges and no regular minutes made. * * * ‘From our researches we conclude that immediately after the adop- tion of the articles, an election was held at the stations. and that then Robertson was chosen colonel; Donelson, lieutenant-colonel: Tu 2a, MAJOr ;pre my t Kn y i 3 le ( Nt | mh MW) ia ! | SAN Ht be AN HANA 5 sid aihbild)all ay 4 VIEW ON FALLS CREEK, NEAR SMITHVILLE, pS eRee eee oe a — BT cuss, Pak Se rreennetrereeeenseenseeerseeeenermneseeeee See a ae ee erry ; Pe Ra ay =~ ae ea ne en eee aaa ee apa < eeeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 189 and George Freeland, Mauldin, Bledsoe and Blackmore, captains.” How long these individuals remained in office, or what duties they per- formed, is not now known. But in 1783 the government was revived, as the following extract shows: NortH CAROLINA, CUMBERLAND RivgER, January 7, 1783 The manifold sufferings and distresses that the settlers here have from time to time undergone, even almost from our first settling, with the desertion of the greater number of the first adventurers, being so discouraging to the remaining few that all administration of justice seemed to cease from amongst us, which, however weak, whether in con- stitution, administration or execution, yet has been construed in our favor against those whose malice or interest would insinuate us a people fled to a hiding place from justice, and the revival of them again earnestly recommended. It appears highly necessary that for the common weal of the whole, the securing of peace, the performance of contracts between man and man, together with the suppression of vice, again to revive our former manner of proceedings, pursuant to the plan agreed upon at our first settling here, and to proceed accordingly until such times as it shall please the Legislature to grant us the sal- utary benefits of the law duly administered amongst us by their authority. To this end, previous notice having been given to the several stationers to elect twelve men of their several stations, whom they thought most proper for the business, and being elected, to meet at Nashborough on the 7th day of January, 1783. Accordingly there met at the time and place aforesaid Col. James Robertson, Capt: George Freeland, Thomas Molloy, Isaac Lindsey, David Rounsevail, Heydon Wells, James Maulding, Ebenezer Titus, Samuel Barton and Andrew Ewin, who constituted themselves into a committee, for the purposes aforesaid, by voluntarily taking the following oath: I. ———, do solemnly swear that as a member of the committee, I will do equal right and justice, according to the best of my skill and judgment, in the decision of all causes that shall be laid before me without fear, favor or partiality. So help me God. The committee then proceeded to elect Col. James Robertson, chair- man; John Montgomery, sheriff, and Andrew Ewin, clerk, and to fix the clerk’s fees. From this time to the organization of Davidson County in April, 1783, the committee held meetings as occasion required, accounts of which will properly be introduced as a prelude to the history of that organization. And in this way the government of the Notables served its purpose and came to its end. It was wholly unlike that other anom- aly in government, the State of Franklin, in not aspiring to independent Statehood, and always looking steadily to North Carolina as the source of proper government for the settlers on the Cumberland. Its proceed- ings were irequently dated ‘ North Carolina, Cumberland District,” and a part of ue time “ Nashborough,” and were continued until in August, after which the regular authorities of Davidson County, the act for the organization of which was approved October 6, 1783, assumed authorita- tive control of public affairs. THE STATE OF FRANKLIN. The Revolutionary war was over and independence won. The colonies and their dependencies were thrown entirely upon their own resources. 12 a TE kn Beira.190 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. somewhat of a chaotic condition, but it is Society was in an unsettled, in } | irit of insubordination and i | remarkable that there was very little of the s} | ou a a Me a anarchy. The main reason for the universal disposiuon te Tee ain eee il | order was undoubtedly the financ ‘jal necessities of the various co onial if ali governments, as W fell as those of the Continental Congress. ‘The stabil- iPad i ity of the ‘ndividual States and of the General Government depended, in 1 an ah large measure, upon the extinguishment of the debts that had been it Hl created during the war of the Yevolution. — ae Ha One of the expedients for improving the condition of things resorted it ih to by Congress, was its suggestion to suc sh of the States as owned vs pou ; i We Hi lands to throw them together, establish a joint fund, and with this joint Ey a Nt fund pay off the common debt. North Carolina owned a large amount ri i i i of territory, extending from the Alleghany Mountains to the Mississipp1 } \ ii i | River, aad among the measures adoptes by her General Sane ee a A a act of June, 1783, ceding to Congress the lands therein described. : I] it hl According to this act the authority of North Carolina was to extend over | | | i i this territory until Congress should accept the eession. ‘The members to ‘| H TH | the General Assembly, from the four western counties, Washington, Sulli- ! Hi | van. Greene and Davidson, were present and voted for the cession. | i {| HH | | These members perceived a disinclination on the part of the parent State \ ii tl, rat | to make proper provision for the protec tion of the people in the western Hi rail | province. Accounts were constantly being presente 1 to the General 1) | Hai | Assembly for the defense of the frontier settlements against the Indians. i ! Vt | These accounts were reluctantly received, cautiously scrutinized and [} fi a | erudgingly paid. Crimination and recrimination were mutually indulged (| i mi | in by North Carolina and her western counties, and it was even intimated iat Wa | that some of these accounts, or portions of some of them, were fabricated i i i or invented. The re of these western counties, whose exposed Hi i | ih siuavion seemed not bo) be appreciated anc es honor seemed thus to HH i i be impugned, remembering that in the Bill of Rights adopted at the same Li) Hat H| time with the State Constitution, a clause had been inserted authorizing ; A | i ie : the formation of one or more new States out of this western territory, ty i) i and entertaining the impression that Congress would not accept the SHEA Mee cession of the territory within the two year limit, and feeling that the new settlements included within this territor y would be practically excluded from the protection of both North ¢ ‘arolina and Congress, would in fact be left in a state of anarchy, unable to command their own powers and resources, knowing that no provision had been made for the estab- CN Ae Se lishment of superior courts west of the mountains, seeing that violations sania of law were permitted to pass unpunished except by the summary process AE > : ; | of the regulators appointed for the purpose by the people themselves, = a a quclapeee ipamhepessaecber migra meHISTORY OF TENNESSER. 193 and perceiving also that the military organization was inadequate to the defense of the inhabitants, in part because there was no brigadier-general authorized to call the military forces into active service, with an extensive frontier constantly exposed to and suffering from the ravages of the savages, and with numerous other considerations suggested to them by their anomalously exposed situation, perceived the necessity of themselves devising means for the extrication of themselves from the numerous, great and unexpected difficulties with which they found themselves sur- rounded. : For the purpose of an attempt at extrication it was proposed that,each captain’s company elect two representatives, and that these representa- tives assemble to deliberate upon the condition of affairs and if possible devise some general plan adapted to the emergency. Accordingly these representatives met August 23, 1783, in Jonesborough. Following are the names of the deputies from Washington County: John Sevier, Charles Robertson, William Trimble, William Cox. Landon Carter, Hugh Henry, Christopher Taylor, John Christian, Samuel Doak, William Campbell, Benjamin Holland, John Bean, Samuel Williams and Richard White. Sullivan County: Joseph Martin, Gilbert Christian, William Cocke, John Manifee, William Wallace, John Hall, Samuel Wilson, Stockley Donelson and William Evans. Greene County: Daniel Ken- nedy, Alexander Outlaw, Joseph Gist, Samuel Weir, Asahel Rawlings, Joseph Bullard, John Managhan, John Murphey, David Campbell, Archibald Stone, Abraham Denton, Charles Robinson and Elisha Baker. Davidson County sent no delegates. John Sevier was chosen president of the convention, and Landon Carter, secretary. A committee was appointed to deliberate upon the condition of affairs, consisting of Cocke, Outlaw, Carter, Campbell, Manifee, Martin, Robinson, Houston, Christian, Kennedy and Wilson. After deliberation upon and discussion of the objects of the convention, during which the Declaration of Independence was read, and the inde- pendence of the three counties represented suggested, the committee drew up and presented a report, which was in substance as follows: That ‘the committee was of the opinion that they had the right to petition Con- gress to accept the cession of North Carolina and to recognize them as a separate government; that if any contiguous part of Virginia should make application to join this association, after being permitted to make such application by Virginia, they should receive and enjoy the same privileges that they themselves enjoyed, and that one or more persons should be sent to represent the situation of things to Congress. This ‘N report was adopted by the following vote: Yeas—Messrs. Terrell, Samms,A. eR ST EL AEs too ete Rr eond 1 1¢ £ t , , 1e — their connection from the old government of Virginia, and attach them selves to the new State of Franklin, or to form a new one distinct from it. It was proposed by Col. Campbell that the limits of the new State, which he was in favor of forming and naming “ Frankland,’ should be as follows: ‘‘ Beginning at a point on the top of the Alleghany or Appalach- ian Mountains, so as a line drawn due north from this point will touch the bank of the New River, otherwise called Kanawha, at its confluence with Little River, which is about one mile from Ingle’s Ferry, down the said river Kanawha to the mouth of the Rencovert, or Green Briar River; a direct line from thence to the nearest summit of the Laurel Mountains, and along the highest part of the same to the point where it is inter- cepted by the thirty-seventh degree of north latitude; west along that lati- tude to a point where it is met by a meridian line that passes through the lower part of the River Ohio; south along the meridian to Elk River, a branch of the Tennessee; down said river to its mouth, and down the Tennessee to the most southwardly part or bend of the said river; a direct line from thence to that branch of the Mobile called Tombigbee; down said river Tombigbee to its junction with the Coosawattee River, to the mouth of that branch of it called the Hightower; thence south to the top of the Appalachian Mountains, or the highest land that divides the sources of the eastern from the western waters; northwardly along the middle of said heights and the top of the Appalachian Mountains to the beginning.” The proposed form of government stated that the inhabitants within the above limits agreed with each other to form themselves into a free and independent body politic or State by the name of the ‘‘ Commonwealth of Frankland.” It will be seen that the people who proposed to estab- lish the independent State of Frankland had affixed such boundaries to their proposed commonwealth as to include the State of Franklin, much of the territory of Virginia, and the present Kentucky, and of Georgia and Alabama. This magnificent project was supported by but few men, and was soon abandoned, even by its friends and projectors. The people who had revolted from North Carolina, however, continued to maintain their form of government, but it still remained for the people in convention assembled to ratify, amend or reject the constitution pro- posed by a former convention. The convention met, but a complete list of their names has not been preserved. ‘The following is a partial list: David Campbell, Samuel Houston, John Tipton, John Ward, Robert Love, William Cox, David Craig, James Montgomery, John Strain, Robert Allison, David Looney, John Blair, James White, Samuel Menece, John Gilliland, James Stuart, George Maxwell, Joseph Tipton and Peter Park- The Bill of Rights and Constitution of the State of Frankland, inson.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 195 were proposed for adoption, discussed and rejected by a small majority. The president of the convention, Gen. John Sevier, then presented the constitution of North Carolina as the foundation of the government for the new State. This constitution, modified to suit the views of the mem- bers of the convention, was adopted by a small majority. The names “Franklin,” after Dr. Benjamin Franklin, of Philadelphia, and “ Frank- land,” meaning the land of freemen, were then proposed, and the name Franklin chosen, and the convention appointed Gen. Cocke to present the constitution as adopted to Congress, with a memorial applying for admis- sion into the Union, but he was not received and no notice was taken of his mission. The Franklin government had now got under way, and Greeneville became the permanent capital of the State. Four days after the Greene- ville Convention was held the North Carolina Legislature passed an act preceded by a preamble in which were recited the reasons for the organ- ization of the State of Franklin, that the citizens thought North Carolina inattentive to their welfare, had ceased to regard them as citizens, and had made an absolute cession of the soil and jurisdiction of the State to Congress. It stated that this opinion was ill-founded, that the General Assembly of North Carolina had been and continued to be desirous of extending the benefits of civil government over them, and granted par- don and oblivion for all that had been done, provided they would return to their allegiance to North Carolina. It appointed officers civil and military in place of those holding office under the State of Franklin, and empowered the voters of Washington, Sullivan and Greene Counties to elect representatives otherwise than by the methods then in vogue. Dissatisfaction with the Franklin government began to manifest itself, and in Washington County, George Mitchell, as sheriff, issued the fol- lowing notice: July, 19th day, 1786. Advertisement—I hereby give Publick Notice that there will be an election held the third Friday in August next at John Rennoe’s near the Sickamore Sholes, where Charles Robinson formerly lived. to choose members to represent Washington County in the Jeneral Assembly of North Carolina, agreeable to an act of Assembly in that case made and provided, where due attendance will be given pr me. GEORGE MITCHELL, Sherzff. The election was held on Watauga River. Col. John Tipton was chosen senator from Washington County, and James Stuart and Richard White members of the House of Commons. Their election was, and was generally perceived to be, ominous of the fate of the State of Frank- lin, and following their example many citizens enrolled their names in opposition to the new State. From this time resistance to its authority assumed a more systematic and determined form. The unusual anomal yTN mages a op shee : ~ Seeny vi ase fee er bets sh elie Pe hod tea i E BLD} Ny «: CR ens ro , ‘ | it t : fi 4 [ nly # Ee ie HE | a : igen om eke Bik naa area Sn SS : ee a ee at aes Tange Ue eect ee Pee pe oe . 3 ah, ‘ mt VE No Rie Sh sagt? ue <4 “ mw AA Ng pO RN ROS NE OE HIE -Tig alent ane AES a et +H e Eee Vt Hi t a ; at | j By Lay, pao Gael dy qa igh ae . fr; ¢)! Bhi bent} +h VP} hi } aii 3 ag bet | eH Ah a an ie at PR Te ene pe men Pee. eanel! Hl | Pit eee | Wil ee | | Nee | Life a af HH PE neg fi 1 | ei TOPE vt Ih Pe Mb ih, | i ie { ii j | Se Ee bly ' 3 eb We | iNet 1 Ha it ik itl iNT ifs a ae Hae A i ea PERE aT) SPER AT | eh | i} A tH | HEA i a ie meat eT eRe Mth } H ne Byes +g P| eH: ie 4s |i Hah W! | Vet mai Bl SUIT Wa ai Wai Hie 1 lead ied ; tal Wait eat I Wok Ht He en a ii we ne LO HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. was exhibited of two empires holding sway at one and the same time over the same territory. As was to be expected, the authority of the two frequently eame in conflict with each other. . by the forces of the other and vice versa, and the But the government of The county courts of the one were broken uy justices of the peace turned out of doors. | Franklin continued to exercise its authority in the seven counties con- stituting its sovereignty, and to defend its citizens from the encroach- ‘ ¥ “ 1, I TATA ¢« 1 ments of the Indians. Gen. Cocke and Judge Campbe ll were appointed eommissioners to negotiate a separation from North Carolina, but not- withstanding their most determined and persistent efforts, the General Assembly of North Carolina disregarded their memorials and protests, and continued to make laws for the government of the people of the State of Franklin. Commissioners were sent to, accepted, and acted under, by several people in Washington, Sullivan and Hawkins Coun- ties as justices of the peace, and courts were held by them as if the State of Franklin did not exist. Difficulties between the two States continued, notwithstanding efforts on the part of the people to adjust them, and trouble with the Indians could not be avoided. Negotiations were con- ducted with Georgia for the purpose of securing mutual assistance. Gov. John Sevier was elected a member of the ‘Society of the Cinein- nati.” Sevier recruited an army to co-operate with Georgia in her cam- paign against the Creek Indians. In 1787 there remained in the com- 7 4 monwealth of Franklin scarcely vitality enough to confer upon it a mere nominal existence, the Legislature itself manifested a strong inclination to dismemberment. its county courts were discordant. and in facet An unpleasant clashing of The under attempting to exercise conflicting authority. opinion and effort to administer the laws was the necessary result. county court of Washington County held its session at Davis’, the authority of North Carolina, while that under Franklin held its ses- sions at Jonesborough. John Tipton was clerk at Davis’ and the fol- lowing extract is from his docket: 1788, February term—Ordered, that the Sheriff take () docket of said county, supposed to be in possession of John Sevier, Esq., and the records being from him or any other person or persons in whose possession they may be, or hereafter shall be, County. The supremacy of the new and old governments was soon after this into custody the County Court same and the same return to this or some succeeding Court for said brought to a test. A scire facias was issued in the latter part of 1787 and placed in the hands of the sheriff to be executed in the early part of The sheriff of North Caro- lina seized Gov. Sevier’s negroes while he was on the frontiers of Greene 1788 against the estate of Gov. John Sevier. County defending the inhabitants against the Indians. Hearing of thisHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 197 action of the sheriff Gov. Sevier immediately resolved to suppress all op- position to the government of Franklin and to punish the actors for their audacity. Raising 150 men he marched directly to Col. Tipton’s house. Goy. Sevier’s indignation had also been aroused by a knowledge of the fact that Tipton had made an attempt to take him prisoner. Upon Sevier’s arrival before Tipton’s house, which was on Sinking Creek, a branch of Watauga River, about eight or ten miles from Jonesborough, he found it defended by Col. Tipton and fifteen of his friends. Though he had a much larger force than Tipton and was in possession of a small piece of ordnance, his demand for an unconditional surrender was met with a flat refusal and the daring challenge “to fire and be damned.” But Goy. Seyier could not bring himself to the point of making an attack upon men who were, and upon whom he looked as, his fellow citizens. Nego- tiations failed to effect a surrender. Gov. Tipton received large rein- forcements, and after the siege had been continued a few days made an attack wpon the Governor’s forces, who, after defending themselves in a half-hearted way for a short time, were driven off. With this defeat of Gov. Sevier’s troops the government of Franklin practically came to an end. But the populace was greatly excited. Not long after this siege, which terminated about February 28, 1788, Bishop Francis Asbury made a visit to the settlements on the Watauga and held a conference, the first west of the mountains, about May 1, 1788. His calm dignity and un- pretending simplicity served to soothe and quiet and harmonize the ex- cited masses, and to convert partisans and factions into brothers and friends. After the termination of the siege at Tipton’s, Goy. Sevier, now a private citizen, was engaged in defending the frontiers against the In- dian® As was to be expected, his conduct was represented to the Gov- ernor of North Carolina as embodying under the form of a coloneley of an Indian expedition, still further resistance to North Carolina. The consequence was that Goy. Johnston issued to Judge Campbell the fol- lowing instructions: HILLSBOROUGH, 29th July, 1788. Sir: It has been represented to the Executive that John Sevier, who styles himself captain-general of the State of Franklin, has been guilty of high treason, in levying troops to oppose the laws and government of the State, and has with an armed force put to death several good citizens. If these facts shall appear to you by the affidavit of credible per- sons, you will issue your warrant to apprehend the said John Sevier, and in case he can not be sufficiently secured for trial in the District of Washington, order him to be com- mitted to the public gaol. Judge Campbell, either from unwillingness or incapacity arising from his past relations with Goy. Sevier, or both, failed to obey the order of Gov. Johnston; but Spencer. one of the judges of North Caro-= reper i lien By ‘i a cf ‘ e "4 te PE Hit eee We i i Phi | \. : bP f qin. Ee E | i a hy i ub Pet iF Re EL fF TEE ui bee rae ;e oT il edit it Pay §3 i j Leu : ey 4 Bi Hi ap et | al Pil Batik PERC THe | hi re th 17 ial bg ae Signe ers rap a ee ay emrmemegs See coat ae eee $A pee nena pti one ate ——— Peer Le EF cree NRE 2 een a Semmes aanera ee : ¥ 198 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. lina, held a superior court at Jonesborough in conjunction with Camp- bell, and there issued the warrant against Sevier for the erime of high After the expiration of considerable time Sevier was arrested, as a prisoner to Morganton for trial, notwith- ainst being taken away from his home and friends: treason. handeuffed, and taken standing his protest ag , | After being in Morganton a few days, during a part of which time he was out on bail, a small party of men, composed of two sons of his. (James and John Sevier), Dr. James Cozby, Maj. Evans, Jesse Greene and John Gibson arrived unnoticed in Morganton, having come in singly, and at night, at the breaking up of the court which was then in session, pushed forward toward the mountains with the Governor with the great- est rapidity, and before morning were there and far beyond pursuit. This rescue, so gallantly made. was both witnessed and connived at by citizens of Burke County, of which Morganton was the county seat, many of whom were friends of Sevier, and although sensible that he had Peon guilty of a technical violation of the law, were yet unwilling to see him suffer the penalty attached by the law to such violation. His cap- ture and brief expatriation only served to heighten, among the citizens of the late State of Franklin whom he had served so long and so well, their appreciation of his services, and to deepen the conviction of his.claims to their esteem and confidence, and when the General Assembly, which met at Fayetteville November 21, 1788, extended the act of pardon to all who had taken part in the Franklin revolt except John Sevier, who was debarred from the enjoyment of any office of profit, of honor or trust in the State of North Carolina, this exception was seen to be at variance with the wishes of the people, and at the annual election in August of the next year the people of Greene County elected John Sevier to repre- sent them in the Senate of North Carolina. At the appointed time, No- vember 2, 1789, he was at Fayetteville, but on account of disabilities did not attempt to take his seat until after waiting a few days, during which time the Legislature repealed the clause above mentioned which debarred him from office. During the session he was reinstated as brigader-gen- eral for the western counties. In apportioning the representatives to Congress from North Carolina the General Assembly divided the State into four Congressional Districts, the westernmost of which comprising all the territory west of the mountains. [rom this district John Sevier was elected, and was thus the first member of Congress from the great Mississippi Valley. He took his seat Wednesday, June 16, 1790.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. CHAPTER VII. ORGANIZATION CONCLUDED—CONGRESSIONAL ACTION FOR THE DISPOSAL OF UN- APPROPRIATED LANDS—THE CESSION ACT OF NORTH CAROLINA—THE AC- CEPTANCE BY CONGRESS—THE DEED—ACT FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE TERRITORY—OFFICES AND COMMISSIONS—GUBERNATORIAL ACTS AND POLI- CIES—THE SPANISH AND THE [INDIAN QUESTIONS—ESTABLISHMENT OF COUN- TIES—THE TERRITORIAL ASSEMBLY—THE EARLY LAWS AND TAXES—OFFI- CIAL DOCUMENTS—STATISTICS—THE FIRST CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION— DEBATE OF FORMS AND PROVISIONS—THE BILL OF RIGHTS—REAL ESTATE TAXATION—OFFICIAL QUALIFICATIONS—OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL MEASURES —_FoRMATION OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT—THE STATE ASSEMBLY—JOHN SEVIER, GOVERNOR—LEGISLATIVE PROCEEDINGS—ESTABLISHMENT OF COURTS —_THE SECOND CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION—ALTERATIONS, ETC.—AMEND- MENTS BEFORE AND SOON AFTER THE CIVIL WAR—THE PRESENT CONSTITU- TION—ITs GENERAL CHARACTER AND WORTH. S was stated under the history of the State of Franklin, it was not long after the dissolution of that organization before it became necessary that separation should occur between North Carolina and her western territory. And this separation was effected by the passage by the mother State of her second cession act, dated December, LiSow Vihis cession was in accordance with the following resolution adopted by the Congress of the United States, October 10, 1780: Resolved: That the unappropriated lands that may be ceded or relinquished to the United States by any particular State, pursuant to the recommendation of Congress of the 6th day of September last, shall be disposed of for the common benefit of the United States and be settled and formed into distinct republican States, which shall become members of the Federal Union and have the same rights of sovereignty, freedom and independence as the other States; that each State which shall be so formed shall contain a suitable extent of territory, not less than one hundred nor more than one hundred and fifty miles square, or asnear thereto as circumstances will admit; that the necessary and reasonable expenses which any particular State shall have incurred since the commencement of the present war, in subduing any British posts or in maintaining forts or garrisons within, and for the defense, or in acquiring any part of the territory that may be ceded or relinquished to the United States, shall be reimbursed; that the said lands shall be granted or settled at such times and under such regulations as shall hereafter be agreed on by the United States in Congress assembled, or any nine or more of them.—Journals of Congress, October 10, 1780. The cession act of North Carolina was in the following language: WHEREAS, the United States in Congress assembled, have repeatedly and earnestly recommended to the respective States in the Union, claiming or owning vacant western territory, to make cession of part of the same as a further means, as well of hastening the extinguishment of the debts, as of establishing the harmony of the United States; and theFANS. ee SSS 5 = bes ae ke ES Raa an | eal +5 Sara Sy ern S Tagagee ae a S ae aap Op a = Sere gga ernie” endo pasguh cmmsang a tn 200 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ‘nhabitants of the said western territory being also desirous that such cession should be a more ample protection than they have heretofore received; made, in order to obtain to the public creditors, as Now, this State, being ever desirous of doing ample justice well as the establishing the harmony of the U nited States, and complying with the rea- sonable desires of her citizens: Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina, and it is hereby enacted by the authority of the same, hat the senators of this State, in the Congress of ‘he United States, or one of the senators and any two of the representatives of this State, in the Congress of the United States, are hereby authorized, empowered and required to execute a deed or deeds on the part and behalf of this State, conveying to the United States of America all right, title and claim w hich this territory of the lands situated within the chartered limits of this State ginning on the extreme height of the Stone Mountain, at a place where the Virginia line said mountain to the place running thence along the extreme height of the a direct course to the top of the Yellow - thence along the ridge of said mountain to the place where the State has to the sovereignty and west of a line be- intersects it; where Watauga River breaks through it; thence Mountain, where Bright’s road crosses the same; hetween the waters of Doe River and the waters of Rock Creek road crosses the Iron Mountain; from thence along the extreme height of said mountain to where Nolichucky River runs through the same; thence to the top of the Bald Mountain; thence along the extreme height of the said mountain to the Painted Rock on French Broad River: thence along the highest ridge of the said mountain to the place where it ‘3 called the Great Iron or Smoky Mountain; thence along the extreme height of the said place where it is called U nicoy or Unaka Mountain, between the Indian mountain to the 1 Old Chota; ne the main ridge of the said mountain to the towns of Cowee ant outhern boundary of this State; upon the following express conditions and subject there to: That ts to say: First. That neither the lands nor the in shall be estimated after the cession made by virtue of this act shall be accepted, in the as the United States in the common expense habitants westward of the said mountain ertaining the proporti mn of this State with occasioned by the late war Secondly. That the lands laid off or direct d to be laid off by an act or acts of the General assembly ot this State for the officers and soldiers th ereof, their heirs and assigns, respectively, shall be and inure to the use and benefit of the said officers, their heirs and assigns, ets. and if the bounds of the lands already prescribed for the officers and soldiers of the continental line of this State shall not contain a sufficient quantity,of land ft for cultivation, to make good the several provisions intended by law, that such officer or F soldier or his assignee, who shall fall short of his allotment or proportion after all the lands fit for cultivation within the said bounds are appropriated, be permitted to take his quota, or such part thereof as may be deficient, in ae other part of the said territory in- tended to be ceded by virtue of this act, not ; ‘eady 1 ppropriated And where entries have been made agreeable to law, and titles under them not perfected by grant or other- wise, then, and in that case, the governor for the time ee shall, and he is hereby required to perfect, from time to time, such titles, in such manner as if this act had never been passed. And that all entries made by, or grants made to, all and every person or persons whatsoever agreeable to law and within the limits hereby intended to be ceded to the United States, shall have the same force and effect as if such cession had not been made; and that all and every right of occupancy and pre-emption and every other right reserved by any act or acts to persons settled on and occupying lands within the limits of the lands hereby intended to be ceded as aforesaid, shall continue to be = ‘tall force in the same manner as if the cession had not been made, and as conditions upon which the said lands are ceded to the United States. And further, it shall be understood that if any person o1 persons shall have by virtue of the act entitled ‘‘An act for opening the land office for the redemption of specie and other certificates and discharging the arrears due to the army, passed in the year one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three, made his or their entryHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 207 in the office usually called John Armstrong’s office and located the same to anv spot or piece of ground on which any other person or persons shall have previously located any entry or entries, and then, and in that case, the person or persons having made such entry or entries, or their assignee or assignees, shall have leave, and be at full liberty to remove the location of such entry or entries, to any land on which no entry has been specially located or on any vacant lands included within the limits of the lands hereby intended fc be ceded: Provided, That nothing herein contained shall extend, or be construed to ex- tend, to the making good of any entry or entries, or any grant or grants heretofore de- clared void, by any act or acts of the General Assembly of this State. Thirdly. That all the lands intended to be ceded by virtue of this act to the United States of America, and not appropriated as before mentioned, shall be considered as a common fund for the use and benefit of the United States of America, North Carolina in- clusive, according to their respective and usual proportion in the general charge and ex- penditure, and shall be faithfully disposed of for that purpose and for no other use or purpose whatever. Fourthly. That the territory so ceded shall be laid out and formed into a State or States,* containing a suitable extent of territory, the inhabitants of which shall enjoy all the privileges, benefits and advantages set forth in the ordinance of the late Congress for the government of the Western Territory of the United States; that isto say: Whenever the Congress of the United States shall cause to be officially transmitted to the executive authority of this State, an authenticated copy of the act to be passed by the Congress of the United States accepting the cession of territory made by virtue of this act under the express conditions hereby specified, the said Congress shall at the same time, assume the government of the said ceded territory, which they shall execute in a similar manner + to that which they support in the territory west of the Ohio; shall protect the inhabitants against enemies and shall never bar nor deprive them of any privileges which the people in the territory west of the Ohio enjoy: Provided always, that no regulations made or to be made by Congress shall tend to emancipate slaves. Fifthly. That the inhabitants of the said ceded territory shall be liable to pay such sums of money as may, from taking their census, be their just proportion of the debt of the United.States, and the arrears of the requisitions of Congress on this State. Sixthly. That all persons indebted to this State residing in the territory intended to be ceded by virtue of this act shall be held and deemed liable to pay such debt or debts in the same manner, and under the same penalty or penalties, as if this act had never been passed. Seventhly. That if the Congress of the United States do not accept the cession hereby intended to be made, in due form, and give official notice thereof to the executive of this State, within eighteen months from the passing of this act, then this act shall be of no force or effect whatsoever. Kighthly. That the laws in force and use in the State of North Carolina, at the time of passing this act shall be, and continue, in full force within the territory hereby ceded until the same shall be repealed or otherwise altered by the Legislative authority of the said territory. Ninthly. That the lands of non-resident proprietors within the said ceded territory shall not be taxed higher than the lands of residents. Tenthly. That this act shall not prevent the people now residing south of French Broad, between the rivers Tennessee and Big Pigeon, from entering their pre-emptions in that tract should an office be opened for that purpose under an act of the present General Assembly. And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, That the sovereignty and jurisdiction of this State, in and over the territory aforesaid, and all and every inhabitant * See Act of Congress of June 1, 1796, post; also resolution of Congress of October 10, 1780, ante. The “ manner” of government here referred to is fully set forth in ‘‘An Ordinance for the Government of the Territory of the United States Northwest of the River Ohio,” passed July 13,1787. The “Territory of the United States south of the River Ohio” was, for the purpose of temporary government, declared to be one district by an act of Congress approved May 26, 1790.asm Re ae Seeley’ > yt ae eB Neg oc tage sarc - " ees re ee emnniemenpeaert ier ne ee 3. Ne Shag gr eae Pe EOI pm em Re Se c me ag SS = Whee Ee meee : ON NT LOE ARLE LA LE IMELODY TNS Ree NE CRA Pte aN serene “a 2 = oR beg a gay / a —_ ae a ae Ti = nar aaa le Sa peep acmapdogladonmee lg pepnan-masibesssioasay aiasinans ese ga NE ILI OP SLT TOTTI bs o> 902 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. thereof, shall be, and remain, the same, in all respects, until the ¢ ongress of the United States shall accept the cession to be made by virtue of this act, as il this act had never passed. | Read three times, and ratified in General Assembly the —— day of December, A. D. 1789 CHAS. JOHNSON, Sp. son Od. S. Caparrus, Sp. H GC. ° ce . se os 1 AOC . T naa Upon the presentation of this cession act to Congress, that body passed the following act accepting the cession: AN ACT TO ACCEPT A CESSION OF THE CLAIMS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TO A CERTAIN DISTRICT OF WESTERN TERRITORY. A deed of cession having been executed, and, in the Senate, offered for acceptance to the United States, of the claims of the State of North Carolina to a district or territory therein described, which deed is in the words following, viz. : To all who shall see these Presents. We, the underwritten Samuel Johnston and Benjamin Hawkins, Senators in the Con- gress of the United States of America, duly and cons stitutionally chosen by the Legislature of the State of North Carolina, send greeti1 * WHueEREAS, The General Assembly of ne State of North Carolina on the ——— day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine, passed an act entitled ‘‘ an act for the purpose of ceding to the United States of America certain western lands therein described,”’ in the words following, to wit: (Here was recited the cession act of North Carolina. ) Now, therefore, know ye, That we, Samuel Johnston and Benjamin Hawkins, Sen- ators aforesaid, by virtue of the power and authority committed to us by the said act, and in the name, and for and on behalf of the said State, do, by these presents, convey, assign, transfer and set over, unto the United States of America, for the benefit of the said States, North Carolina inclusive, all right, title and claim which the said State hath to the sover- eignty and territory of the lands situated within the chartered limits of the said State. as bounded and described in the above recited act of the General Assembly, to and for the use and purposes, and on the conditions mentioned in the said act. In witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names and affixed our seals in the Senate chamber at New York, this twenty-fifth day of Febru- ary, in the year of our Lord one ere seven hundred and ninety, and in the fourteenth year of the independence of the United States of America. Signed, sealed and del livered in the presence of SAM, A. OTIS SAM. JOHNSTON, 3ENJAMIN HAWKINS. The following act was then passed by Congress: Be tt enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of Amer- wca in Congress assembled, That the said deed be, and the same is he reby accepted. FREDERICK AuUGustTUs Mu HLENBERG, Speaker of the House of Representatives. JOHN ADAMS, Vice-President of the United States and Presid nt of the Senate. Approved April the 2d, 1790. GEORGE WASHINGTON, President of the United States The cession thus being accepted and approved, Congress ward passed a law for the government of the new acquisition. vas In the following lancuage: soon after- This lawHISTORY OF TENNESSEE 203 _AN ACT FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH OF THE RIVER OHIO. Sporron 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United State of America in Congress assembled, That the territory of the United States south of the river Ohio, for the purposes of temporary government, shall be one district, the inhab- itants of which shall enjoy all the privileges, benefits and advantages, set forth in the -ordinance of the late Congress for the government of the territory of the United States northwest of the river the Ohio. And the government of the said territory south of the Ohio, shall be similar to that which is now exercised in the territory northwest of the Ohio, except so far as is otherwise provided in the conditions expressed in an act of Congress of the present session entitled: ‘An act to accept a cession of the claims of the State of North Carolina to a certain district of western territory.” Src. 2. And be it further enacted, That the salaries of the officers, which the Pres- ‘dent of the United States shall nominate, and with the advice and consent of the Senate appoint, by virtue of this act shall be the same as those, by law established of similar offi- cers in the government northwest of the river Ohio. And the powers, duties and emol- uments of a superintendent of Indian affairs for the Southern Department shall be united with those of the Governor. Approved May 26, 1790. Congress haying thus made provision for the government of the ter- ritory, the duty devolved upon President George Washington to appoint suitable officers to carry the government of the new territory into oper- ation. As is usual in such cases, there were several gentlemen of acknowledged capacity and worth of character, who through their friends were candidates for the office of governor. Mr. Mason of Virginia was pre- sented to the President by Patrick Henry. But the representatives in the North Carolina General Assembly from Washington and Mero Districts, had frequently met in the Assembly a North Carolina gentleman, kindly and sociable in disposition, of graceful and accomplished manner, business- like in his habits, and of extensive information respecting Indian affairs, and. who in addition to these qualifications had manifested many proofs of sympathy and interest for the pioneers of the territory now needing an executive head. This gentleman was William Blount, and besides his eminent fitness for the position; there was an evident propriety in select- ing the governor from the State, by which the territory had been ceded to the United States. President Washington, recognizing the validity and force of these considerations, issued to him a commission as goy- ernor, which he received August 7,1790. On the 10th of October follow- ing, Gov. Blount reached the scene of his new and important public duties on the frontier, and took up his residence at the house of William Cobb, near Washington Court House, in the fork of Holston and Watauga Rivers, and not far from Watauga Old Fields. Mr. Cobb was a wealthy farmer, an emigrant from North Carolina, and was no stranger to com- oO ) oD fort, taste nor style. He entertained elegantly, and kept horses, dogs, rifles and even traps for the comfort and amusement of his guests. Thusli ST TA i =i 3 a % a rem SOT eee OE a re oper se eate tS = Ligon aren 2 : ‘ = a fi Ril il i {is : 2 i ya { 4 i i ‘iB ‘ 4 i ea ie ae ; eit ¥ ft 4 i ‘ . F ‘ CaS — Ny NEL So Tr 204 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. surrounded, Goy. Blount held his first court. The President had ap- pointed as judges in the Territorial Government David Campbell and Joseph Anderson. David Campbell will be remembered as having held ate of Franklin, and subsequently under the appointment of North Carolina. Joseph Anderson had been an offi- cer in the Continental service during the Revolutionary war. Gov. Blount appointed Daniel Smith Secretary of the Territorial Government, and also the civil and military officers for the counties forming the dis- trict of Washington. The oath of office was administered to these ap- ; The following are the names of some of oe . os . 7 a similar position under the St pointees by Judge Campbell. a the officers: Washington County, November term, 1790—magistrates, Charles Robertson, John Campbell, Edmond Williams and John Chis- holm: clerk, James Sevier. Greene County, February term, 1791— magistrates, Joseph Hardin, John Newman, William Wilson, John Mc- Nabb and David Rankin; clerk, David Kennedy. David Allison and William Cocke were admitted to the bar. Hawkins County, December term. 1790, clerk, Richard Mitchell. The private secretaries of the Governor were Willie Blount, his half- brother, afterward governor, and Hugh Lawson White, afterward Judge White, and -andidate for the presidency of the United States. Having commissioned the necessary officers for the counties of Washington Dis- trict. Gov. Blount set out for Mero District on the 27th of November. Mero District was composed of Davidson, Sumner and Tennessee Coun- John Donelson, justice of the peace, and Samp- ties. Davidson County son Williams was appointed sheriff, and upon the presentation of his com- mission from the governor, was appointed by the court. Sumner County: Benjamin Menees was appointed justice of the peace, his commission be- ing dated December 15, 1730, as were also George Bell, John Philips and Martin Duncan. Anthony Crutcher was appointed clerk, and James Boyd sheriff. At the April term, 171, John Montgomery produced his commission from Goy. Blount as justice of the peace. In all the counties the Governor had appointed military officers below the rank of brigadier-general. These he was not authorized to appoint, but recom- mended for appointment Col. John Sevier for Washington District, and Col. James Robertson for Mero District. These commissions were issued in February, 1791. Following is the commission of John Don- elson: WILLIAM BLOUNT, GOVERNOR IN AND OVER THE TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOUTH OF THE RIVER OBIO. To all who shall see these Presents, Greeting: Know ye that I do appoint John Donelson, Esq., of the County of Davidson in the said Territory, a Justice of the Peace for the said County, and do authorize and empowerHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 205 him to execute and fulfill the duties of that office according to law, and to have and to hold the said office during his good Behavior, or during the existence of the Temporary Government of said Territory, with all the powers, authorities and privileges to the same of right appertaining. Given under my hand and seal in the said Territory, this 15th day of December, 1790 By the Governor: WILLIAM BLounvt. DANIEL SMITH. In his tour through the territory, Gov. Blount endeavored to famil- iarize himself with the condition and necessities of the inhabitants, with the view of becoming better prepared to discharge his official duties. His position was by no means a sinecure, for, besides the ordinary duties of his gubernatorial office, he was obliged to perform those pertaining to that of superintendent of Indian affairs, having been also appointed to that position on account of his long familiarity with the Indian tribes, with whom the people of his territory were necessarily Immediately in eontact. It was and is believed that no man could have been selected better qualified than he to reconcile the two classes of citizens more or less estranged by the setting up, continuing in existence and dissolution of the anomalous government of the State of Franklin, and to regulate affairs between the people of the territory, the Indians, and the govern- ment of the United States. His superintendency of Indian affairs i1n- cluded the four southern tribes—the Creeks, the Cherokees, the Chicka- saws and Choctaws. All of these tribes either resided within or claimed hunting grounds within his own territory, and the collisions continually occurring between some of these Indians and the settlers caused a con- stant complaint to be addressed to the Governor for redress or mitigation. One reason of these conflicts was, that in all of the tribes there were sev- eral distinct parties swayed by opposing influences and motives. Some adhered and favored adherence to the United States; others adhered to the Spanish authorities, who still held possessions with military and trad- ing posts in Florida, and also similar posts within the limits of the United States east of the Mississippi. The Spaniards, notwithstanding treaties of peace and professions of friendship, by artful persuasions and tawdry presents, incited and inflamed the savages to robbery, pillage and mur- der. To reconcile all these animosities, and to protect the people from their naturally injurious effects, frequent conferences and an extensive correspondence were required, as also was required a high degree of ad- ministrative and diplomatic ability. The difficulties of his position were enhanced by the policy of the Government of the United States, which was to avoid offensive measures, and rely upon conciliation and defense with the view of the establishment of peace between the various Indian tribes and the settlements, and the neutralization of the influence of the 13206 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. g . : Pen (Nes p aL, ssible Spaniards. Under these circumstances, Goy. Blount found it impossibl s - * 7 * 2 . ” ‘ J : . " T y to afford protection to settlers upon the frontier, aggressions upon W hom « ae r J : > am ( were numerous and of several years’ continuance. The settlers them- vas being destroved and whose friends and rela- selves, whose property 1 er ppreciate this inof- tives were being barbarously murdered, could not a fensive policy, but burned with the desire to retaliate in kind upon their ras ‘fectly natur: ape he head of Gov. savage Loe, and, as was perfectly natural, heaped upon t é Blount unstinted censure. = —_ XN ents the treaty concluded Aucust 17, 1790, between the Government of the } , g > : a United States and the Creek nation of Indians, by which a large territory was restored to that nation. The treaties, however, were not observed by the Indians, and, consequently, not by the white people, who complained against the Governor for not adopting vigorous measures of offense. The Indians complained that such measures were adopted, and the United States Government complained that the expense of protecting the frontier Thus Gov. Blount was the center of a steady Neither were they any better satisfied with accumulated so rapidly. | fire of complaint from at least three different sources. But like the mar- tvrs. of old, the Governor bore these complaints with equanimity, and at : ig that the fault was not with him, withdrew length the people, ascertainil their complaints, and very generally sustained his authority. Besides difficulties with the Indians the duty devolved upon the Goy- ernor of preventing the settlement by the Tennessee Company of their immense purchase in the Great Bend of the Tennessee River, which was at length effectually prevented by the State of Georgia annulling the sale. He had also to raise a force of 332 men in the district of Wash- ington for service under Gen. St. Clair at Fort Washington. These duties. however, he was obliged to permit to fall on Gen. Sevier, his own time being so fully engrossed with his Indian superintendency, in which capacity he made a treaty with the Cherokees on the Holston July 2, 1791. Indian hostilities, however, continued, notwithstanding the treaty of Holston, and numerous people were killed for a number of years. During the next year the Governor held another conference with the In- dians, this time at Nashville with the Chickasaws and Choctaws, and in eompany with Gen. Pickens, who attended the conference at the request of the Secrerary of War. There was a large delegation of chiefs in cave renewed < Aipee i He ia? ‘ 4 4 1 eer i , j ali ; ; K 7 ; tase i iS % tity = se = sors Snereenens coment = - > Sab = : Ps = = 7 7 . ee ES : eT sien ane wa g : a oom — 7 = a nnanNS ~ ——— os eS 7 a o~ = —~ oT Pas 7 ‘ - _ e - is ntuiationinnaal af wa i % : : . = - =a. ait oe a oes ai = — : ~ ele Sele i —— > ne eee . ee ee - AY 4 TE E se co - adi a haeelleg i —— ss eae DAZ, HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. of the General Assembly; and that all free males twenty one years of age and upward, be considered entitled to vote by ballot for five persons for members of convention, and that the sheriffs or their deputies holding such polls of election give certificates to the five persons in each county having the greatest number of votes, of their being duly elected members of convention. And I, the said William Blount, Governor, etc., think proper here to declare that this recommendation is not intended to have, nor ought to have, any effect whatever upon the present temporary form of government; and that the present temporary form will con- tinue to be exercised in the same manner as if it had never been issued, until the conven- tion shall have formed and published a constitution or permanent form of government. Done at Knoxville November 28, 1795. WILLIAM BLouNT. By the Governor, WILLIE BuLount, Pro. Secretary. In accordance with the suggestions of this proclamation, elections were held in each of the eleven counties in the Territory, for five mem- bers of the convention from each county. ‘These members met at Knox- ville, January 11, 1796. Following are the names of the members who appeared, produced their credentials and took their seats: Jefferson County—Joseph Anderson, George Doherty, Alexander Outlaw, William Roddye, Archibald Roane. Hawkins County 3erry, William Cocke, Thomas Henderson, Joseph McMinn, Richard Mitchell. Greene County—Elisha Baker, Stephen Brooks, Samuel Fra- zier, John Galbreath, William Rankin. Knox County—John Adair, Will- iam Blount, John Crawford, Charles McClung, James White. Wash- ington County—Landon Carter, Samuel Handley, James Stuart, Leroy Taylor, John Tipton. Sullivan County—William C. C. Claiborne, Riche ard Gammon, George Rutledge, John Rhea, John Shelby, Jr. Sevier James County—Peter Bryan, Thomas Buckingham, John Clack, Samuel Wear. Spencer Clack. Blount County—Joseph Black, David Craig, Samuel Glass, James Greenaway, James Houston. Davidson County—Thomas Hardeman, Andrew Jackson, Joel Lewis, John McNairy, James Robert- son. Sumner County—Kdward Douglass, W. Douglass, Daniel Smith. D. Shelby, Isaac Walton. Tennessee County—James Ford, William Fort, Robert Prince, William Prince, Thomas Johnson. The convention was organized by the election of William Blount, pres- ident; William Maclin, secretary, and John Sevier, Jr.. reading and en- grossing clerk. John Rhea was appointed door-keeper. On motion ot Mr. White, seconded by Mr. Roddye, it was ordered that the next morn- ing’s session commence with prayer, and that a sermon be delivered by Rey. Mr. Carrick. In the act providing for the enumeration of the in- habitants of the Territory, it was provided that each member of the con- vention should be entitled to receive the same wages as a member of that session of the Assembly —$2.50 per day. The convention on the second day of its session adopted the following resolutions:HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Aled Resolved, ‘ ‘Tere 7 IQ ¢ « yr » T a ved, That economy is an admirable trait in any government and that, in fixing the salaries of the officers thereof, the situation and resources of the country should be attended to. ) Resolved, That ten shillings and sixpence, Virginia currency, per day to every member is a Sufficient compensation for his services in the Convention, and one dollar for ev ery thirty miles they travel in coming to and returning from the Convention, and that the members pledge themselves each one to the other that they will not draw a creater sum out of the public treasury. i After substituting $1.50 for 10s. 6d. in the second resolution, both resolutions were unanimously adopted. It was then resolved that the con- vention appoint two members from each county to draft a constitution and that each county name its members, and accordingly the following . * * : i ; S individuals were named as members of the committee. 2 Y . 2 2 . Blount County—Daniel Craig and Joseph Black. Davidson County —Andrew Jackson and John McNairy. Greene County—Samuel Fra- gier and William Rankin. Hawkins County—Thomas Henderson and William Cocke. Jefferson County- ph Anderson and William Roddye. Knox County—William Blount and Charles McClung. Sulli- van County—William C. C. Claiborne and John Rhea. Sumner County —D. Shelby and Daniel Smith. Sevier County—John Clack and Same uel Wear. ‘Tennessee County—Thomas Johnson and William Fort. Washington County—John Tipton and James Stuart. On motion of Mr. McMinn, the sense of the convention was taken as to whether a declara- tion of rights be prefixed to the constitution, which being decided in the affirmative the committee was directed to present as early as practic- able a declaration or bill of rights to be thus prefixed. A bill of rights was consequently prepared, but later in the session it was decided by the eonvention to affix it to the constitution as the eleventh arti- cle thereof. 7 On the 18th of January an important question was presented to the convention by Mr. Outlaw, as to whether the Legislature should consist of two houses. This question being decided in the affirmative, another question was raised by Mr. McNairy as to whether the two houses in the Legislature should be of equal numbers and of equal powers. ‘This ques- tion, being decided in the affirmative, was the next day reconsidered on motion of Mr. McNairy, and amended so as to read as follows: In lieu of the words “two houses,” insert ‘‘one House of Representatives,” and that no bill or resolution shall be passed unless by two thirds of the whole number of members present. This proposed form of the legisla- tive branch of the government was, upon reflection, no more satisfactory than ‘“‘two houses of equal numbers and powers,” and on the 20th of Jan- uary the convention again resolved itself into committee of the whole on this question ; and Mr. Robertson. chairman of the committee, reportedSe Sa enc prc een mo ae Se Sie ee 914 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. . Y a that “the Legislature shall consist of two branches, a Senate and a House : “oO 7 . anized on the principles of the constitution of North of Represenatives, org ears: and that the members of each Carolina, to be elected once in two y house be elected by the same electors, and that the qualifications of the members of each house be the same, until the next enumeration of the people of the United States, and then to be represented by members, re- taining the principle of two representatives to one senator; provided the ratio shall be such as that both shall not exceed forty until the number of the people exceed 200,000, and that the number shall never exceed sixty.” , Although in the report of the proceedings of the convention no further reference is made to discussions upon this part of the constitution, yet on January 30, when the draft of the constitution was considered in com- mittee of the whole, this clause is found to have undergone considerable change. It was then provided that the General Assembly should consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives, the former to consist of one and the latter of two members from each county, to continue thus for sixteen years from the commencement of the second session, and after that representation should be apportioned according to numbers in such manner that the whole number of senators and representatives should not exceed thirty-nine until the number of free white persons should be 200,000, and after that (preserving the same ratio of two representatives to one senator) the entire number of senators and representatives should never exceed sixty. As finally adopted on February 4, 1796, this portion of the constitution assumed the following form: ARTICLE I. Section 1. The legislative authority of this State shall be vested in a General As- sembly, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives, both dependent on the people. Src. 2. Within three years after the first meeting of the General Assembly, and with- in every subsequent term of seven years, an enumeration of the taxable inhabitants shall be made in such manner as shall be directed by law. The number of representatives shall at the several periods of making such enumeration be fixed by the Legislature, and appor- tioned among the several counties according to the number of taxable inhabitants in each, and shall never be less than twenty-two, nor greater than twenty-six, until the number of taxable inhabitants shall be 40,000; and after that event at such ratio that the whole num- ber of representatives shall never exceed forty. Sec. 3. The number of senators shall at the several periods of making the enumera- tion before mentioned be fixed by the Legislature, and apportioned among the districts, formed as hereinafter directed, according to the number of taxable inhabitants in each, and shall never be less than one-third, nor more than one-half of the number of representa- tives. Src. 4. The senators shall be chosen by districts, to be formed by the Legislature, each district containing such a number of taxable inhabitants as shall be entitled to electHISTORY OF TENNESSER. 215: not more than three senators. When a district shall be composed of two or more counties they shall be adjoining, and no county shall be divided in forming a district. Thus was concluded perhaps the most important part of the work of the convention. It is doubtless more curious than profitable to: reflect upon what would have been the consequences to the people of the State had either of the earlier propositions been adopted—to form a Legislature consisting of two houses of equal power and numbers, or of ‘‘one House 5 of Representatives.” It is an interesting study, however, to note the varying forms this subject assumed in the minds of those primitive con- stitution builders, illustrating as it does the general principle that the wisest form or course is seldom that first suggested to the mind. There are other features in this constitution, declared by Jefferson to be the “least imperfect and most republican” of the systems of government adopted by any of the American States, worthy of especial comment. Several of its features or principles had previously been enacted into laws by North Carolina. So far as those laws are concerned these principles had their origin in the demands of the times, or the necessities of the people; and experience, that great teacher of the wise legislator, had de- termined their wisdom by demonstrating their adaptability to the ends they were designed to subserve. This adaptability being thus clearly proven by experience, the principles were embodied in the constitution for the purpose of conferring upon the people with certainty the benefits to be derived from their operation, and of placing them beyond the power and caprice of Legislatures; for it is worthy of remark that the present, no matter how much confidence it may possess in its own wisdom and in that of the past, has very little respect for that of the future. One of these principles was enacted into a law, in 1777, by the Legislature of North Carolina, as follows: “That every county court shall annually se- lect and nominate a freeholder, of sufficient circumstances, to execute the office of sheriff, who shall thereupon be commissioned by the governor, or commander-in-chief, to execute that office for one year.” The Con- stitution of Tennessee, Article VI, Section 1, reads as follows: ‘There shall be appointed in each county, by the county court, one sheriff, one coroner, one trustee, and a sufficient number of constables, who shall hold their offices for two years. They shall also have power to appoint one register and one ranger for the county, who shall hold their offices during good behavior. The sheriff and coroner shall be commissioned by the governor.” In 1784 the Legislature of North Carolina passed the fol- lowing law: WHEREAS, It is contrary to the spirit of the constitution and the principles of a gen- uine republic that any person possessing a lucrative office should hold a seat in the Gen- eral Assembly;To See OS = — SERRE NT ET LMR as ee SOMBER eae es D116 HISTORY OF TENNESSEF. That from and after the present session of the General As- profit, either by stated salary or commis- apable of being elected a member to Therefore, be vt enacte dec; sembly, every person holding a public office of sions, shall be and they are hereby declared to be inc serve in the General Assembly, or to enjoy seats therein. This principle was embodied in the constitution of Tennessee in the following form: “No person, who heretofore hath been or herearier may be a collector or holder of public monies. shall have a seat in either house of the General Assembly.” The next section was of similar import. In No. 7 . ; ~. Chi. wee : the vear 1785 North Carolina passed the following law: ‘“That from and of this act the several county courts of pleas and quarter alter passing hold and exercise jurisdiction in all sessions within this State shall have, actions of trespass in ejectment, formedon in descender, remainder and reyerter, dower and partition, and of trespass quare clausum fregit, any law to the contrary notwithstanding,” ete. The constitution of Tennessee, Article V, Section 7, provides that ‘‘the judges or justices of the inferior courts of law shall have power in all civil eases. to issue writs of certiorari, to remove any cause or a transcript thereof from any, inferior jurisdiction into their court, on sufficient cause supported by oath of affirmation.” North Carolina enacted in 1786 that the public tax on each and every poll should equal the public tax on 300 acres of land. The constitution of ‘’ennesee, Article I, Section 26, pro- vides that “no freeman shall be taxed higher than 100 acres of land, and no slave higher than 200 acres on each poll.” But perhaps the most re- markable feature of this constitution was that respecting the tax to be levied on land, in the following language: ‘All lands liable to taxation in this State, held by deed, entry or grant, shall be taxed equally and uniformly in such manner that no 100 acres shall be taxed higher than another, except town lots,” ete. It is not certain whence this idea was derived. Itis not to be found in the constitution of North Carolina, nor in that of any of the other States. It probably originated in the Territorial Legislature of 1794, in which, as will be seen by reference to the preceding pages, the most se- rious contest occurred over the question of what the tax should be upon each 100 acres of land, whether 124 cents, 18 or 25 cents, the decision being finally in favor of 25 cents. The idea of taxing lands according to quantity instead of according to value was probably derived from the fact of the equal value of the lands at that time, and was suggested to the constitutional convention of 1796 by the course pursued by the Ter- ritorial Legislature of 1794. constitution of this State, where it remained an anomalous feature, work- At any rate it was embodied in the first ing greater and greater injustice, as lands became more and more un- equal in value, until the adoption of the constitution of 1834, when theHISTORY OF ‘TENNESSER. PAT principle was adopted of taxing lands as well as other property according to their value. 5 With reference to the qualifications of electors the constitution of Tennessee provided that ‘“Kyvery freeman of the age of twenty-one years and upwards possessing a freehold in the county wherein he may sata and being an inhabitant of this State, and every freeman being an in- habitant of any one county in this State six months immediately pre- ceding the election, shall be entitled to vote for members of fie Gen- eral Assembly for the county in which he may reside.” ‘This was a step considerably in advance of the provisions of the North Carolina constitu- tion, which required an elector to be a freeman, a resident of the county twelve months, and to be possessed of a freehold of fifty acres in the county in which he resided, to qualify him to vote for senator. To be qualified to vote for representative he was required to have been a resl- dent of his county twelve months, and to have paid public taxes. But it will be observed that under both these constitutions colored men, if free, could vote. Then in reference to the qualifications of office-holders, the constitu- tion of Tennessee provided, like that of North Carolina, that no clergy- man or preacher of the gospel should be eligible to a seat in either house of the General Assembly. With regard to the religious qualification of office-holders in general, it is interesting to note the advance made in public opinion during the twenty years from 1776 to 1796. In the North Carolina constitution it was provided that ‘No person who shall deny the being of God, or the truth of the Protestant religion, or the divine authority of either the Old or New Testament; or who shall hold religious principles incompatible with the freedom or safety of the State, shall be capable of holding any office or place of trust or profit in the civil de- partment of this State.” The constitutional convention of Tennessee, when discussing this question, evidently had the constitution of North Carolina before them, and were determined to improve upon that instru- ment. When the first draft of the constitution was presented, January 30, 1796, no reference was made to religious qualifications for office- holders; but on February 2, Mr. Doherty moved, and Mr. Roan seconded the motion, that the following be inserted as a section in the constitution: ‘No person who publicly denies the being of God, and future rewards or the divine authority of the Old and New T estaments, and punishments, which was shall hold any office in the civil department in this State; agreed to. Mr. Carter then moved, and Mr. Mitchell seconded the motion, ) Oo that the words ‘‘or the divine authority of the Old and New Testaments © called for,, be struck out, which being objected to, the yeas and nays wereee 5 eae, ro ee Sa Sn —s a oa a TRA OIE rte AeA — FERS TE pr ne ceca Sanna ats ge ay Sra ag te bee Sate 3 a = [canallllnalletaaeeeeeeenEnnenneneemmenneemeeennn a % pag eee =, a a = oo 218 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. and resulted in an affirmative victory by a vote of twenty-seven votes to twenty-six. Afterward the word “publicly” was struck out, and this section of the constitution was adopted in the following form: ‘‘ No person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punish- ments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this State.” One or two features of the bill of rights are deemed worthy of notice in this connection. The twenty-ninth section, adopted through. the efforts of William Blount, was as follows: ‘That an equal participation of the free navigation of the Mississippi is one of the inherent rights of the citizens of this State; it cannot, therefore, be conceded to any prince, potentate, power, person or persons whatever.”’ Section 31 was as follows: ‘That the people residing south of French Broad and Hols- ton, between the rivers Tennessee and Big Pigeon, are entitled to the right of pre-emption and occupation in that tract.” It is stated that the name ‘“‘ Tennessee”’ was suggested as the name of the State by Andrew Jackson, the members from the county of Tennessee consenting to the loss of that name by their county, on condition that it be assumed by the State. The president of the convention was instructed to take the constitu- tion into his safe keeping until a secretary of State should be appointed under it, and then to deliver it to him. The president was also instructed to send a copy of the constitution to the Secretary of State of the United States; and he was also instructed to “issue writs of election to the sheriffs of the several counties, for holding the first election of members of the General Assembly and a governor, under the au- thority of the constitution of Tennessee, to bear teste of this date.” (February 6, 1790.) On the 9th of February a copy of the constitution was forwarded to the Secretary of State, Mr. Pickering, by Joseph McMinn, who was instructed to remain at the seat of the Federal Gov- ernment long enough to ascertain whether members of Congress from Tennessee would be permitted to take their seats in Congress. Mr. White, who was then territorial delegate in that body, was urged by Mr. McMinn to apply for the admission of Tennessee into the Union. In response to the application of Mr. W hite, Congress at length passed the following act, receiving the State of Tennessee into the Union: WHEREAS, By the acceptance of the deed of cession of the State of North Carolina, Congress are bound to lay out into one or more States the territory thereby ceded to the United States. : Be it enacted, etc., That the whole of the territory ceded to the United States by the State of North Carolina shall be one State. and the same is hereby declared to be one of the United States of America, on an equal footing with the original States, in all respects whatever, by the name and title of the State of Tennessee. That until the next reneral g ‘ census the said State of Tennessee shall be entitled to one representative in the House ofHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. PAD Representatives of the United States; and in all other respects as far as they may be applicable, the laws of the United States shall extend to and have force in the State of Tennessee, in the same manner as if that State had originally been one of the United States. ; Approved June the Ist, 1796. JONATHAN DAYTON, GEORGE WASHINGTON, Speaker of the House of Representatives. President of the United States. SAMUEL LIVERMORE, President of the Senate, pro. tem. Writs of election were issued by the president of the convention to the sheriffs of the several counties, requiring them to hold the first elec- tion of members of the General Assembly, and governor of the State. The Legislature thus elected assembled at Knoxville March 28. The Senate was constituted as follows: From Tennessee County, James Ford; from Sumner County, James Winchester; from Knox County, James White; from Jefferson County, George Doherty; from Greene County, Samuel Frazier; from Washington County, John Tipton; from Sullivan County, George Rutledge; from Sevier County, John Clack; from Blount County, Alexander Kelly; from Davidson County, Joel Lewis; from Hawkins County, Joseph McMinn. The Senate was organized by the election of James Winchester, speaker; Francis A. Ramsey, clerk; Nathaniel Buckingham, assistant clerk; Thomas Bounds, door-keeper. The House of Representatives was composed of the following gentlemen: Blount County, Joseph Black and James Houston; Davidson County, Seth Lewis and Robert Weakley; Greene County, Joseph Conway and John Gass; Hawkins County, John Cocke and Thomas Henderson; Jefferson County, Alexander Outlaw and Adam Peck; Knox County, John Crawford and John Manifee; Sullivan County, David Looney and John Rhea; Sevier County, Spencer Clack and Samuel Newell; Sumner County, Stephen Cantrell and William Mont- gomery; J'ennessee County, William Fort and Thomas Johnson; Wash- ington County, John Blair and James Stuart. James Stuart was chosen speaker; Thomas H. Williams, clerk; John Sevier, Jr., assistant clerk, and John Rhea, door-keeper. The two houses being thus organized met in the representatives chamber, to open and publish the returns of the election in the several counties for governor. From these returns it appeared that “citizen John Sevier is duly and constitutionally elected governor of this State, which was accordingly announced by the speaker of the Senate, in pres- ence of both houses of the General Assembly. On the same day a joint committee was appointed ‘“‘to wait on his Excellency, John Sevier, and request his attendance in the House of Representatives, to-morrow, at 12 o’ clock, to be qualified agreeably to the constitution of the State of Tennes-eet aes Se ee ae a — 2 alfa a a Oa ties wre aetioe! Seats tigre . ee Page on ace s . —_ 7 ere 7 . a “ oe see aR <= m3 ee ne as I mati cee 5 ~ = 4 panera on acme : sa : : - = — — eee " ene : we again, in Ss See ee ** oe gg eee hates 7 ee a ae TENT OI RR eS phe se eS Sen Pies ti ae page nr 22.0) HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Gov. William Blount was requested to-be present at the qual- see.” 1 30, “both houses having fication of the governor elect, and on Marcl convened in the representative ¢ chamber, the several oaths prescribed for the qualification of the governor were du ! | by the honorable Joseph Anderson.’ After his Inauguration Gov. Sevier presented the following address: ly administered to him Gentlemen of the Senate and House of Kepre sentatrves: The high and honors able appointment conferred upon me by the free suffrage of my fills my breast with gratitude, w hich, I trust, my future life will manifest countrymen, my thanks in the strongest terms of I take this early opportunity to express, through you, acknowledgment. I shall labor to discharge with fidelity the trust re posed in me; and if such my exertions should prove satisfactory, the first wish of my heart will be gratified Gentlemen, accept of my best wishes for your individual and public happiness; and, rel ing upon your wisdom and patriotism, I have no doubt but the result of your delibe1 ie will give permanency and success to our new sy stem of government, so wisely calculated to the liberty and advance the happiness and prosperity of our fellow citizens. JOHN SEVIER. secure t The duty of electing United States Senators for Tennessee still re mained unperformed. The mode adopted at that time was as follows! The following message was sent by the House to t the Senate: ‘‘This House propose to procee 1d to the election of two senators to represent this State in the Congress of the United States; and that the Senate and House of Representatives do convene in the House of Representatives for that purpose to-morrow at 10 o’clock; and do propose Mr. William 3lount, Mr. William Cocke and Mr. Joseph Anderson, as candidates for the Senate.” The Senate replied by the following message: ‘‘ We concur with your message as to the time and place for the election by you proposed, and propose Dr. James White to be added to the nomin- ation of candidates for the Senate.” On the next day the names of Jo- seph Anderson and James White were withdrawn, leaving only William Blount and William Cocke as candidates, who were thereupon duly and constitutionally elected the first United States senators from Tennessee. Addresses were prepared by committees appointed for that purpose to William Blount as retiring governor, and as senator elect, and to William Cocke as senator elect, to which both these gentlemen appropriately replied. William Maclin was elected Secretary of State; Landon Carter, treasurer of the districts of Washington and Hamilton, and William Black, treasurer of the district of Mero. John McNairy, Archibald Roane and Willie Blount, were elected judges of superior courts of law and equity. This election occurred April 10. John McNairy and ae Blount declined the appointment, and Howell Tatum and W. . Claiborne were com- missioned in their places respectively. John C. Aca was appointed attorney for the State, in place of Howell Tatum, appointed judge.ie Wes REY JOHN SEVIERpe ee ee » A fr i e bee COP ieeet th! if i% ' Fin by ee ea! bee che nia | j Hd | t} i i EE eat , eh Loe i i My Hi on =yeT- “ nT ote eens spesesamsnumpmanionee. eiamee, fo ee i ae eae rsp ieketaeen creat aii”y ws euteetneseroee MH eg eye) 8 ae Pah : Al Pai ail ea | i} ; aie} bhai ayy HA ay i) eS Ah, Ry | Ren a erred lig peste mrs ok ay { 1 i iat } TOL ie a} +} Wid a aHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 994 On the 14th of April a curious piece of legislation was attempted in the House of Representatives: “The bill to preclude persons of a certain description from being admitted as witnesses, etc., was then taken up, to which Mr. Gass proposed the following amendment: ‘That from and after the passing of this act, if any person in this State shall publicly deny the being of a God and a future state of rewards and punishments. or shall publicly deny the divine authority of the Old and New Testa. ments, on being convicted thereof, by the testimony of two witnesses. shall forfeit and pay the sum of —— dollars for every such offense, ete.’ The foregoing amendment being received the question was taken on the amended bill which was carried. Whereupon the yeas and nays were called upon by Mr. Johnson and Mr. Gass, which stood as follows’ Yeas: Messrs. Blair, Black, Conway, Clack, Crawford, Gass, Houston. Johnson, Looney, Montgomery, Newell, Outlaw, Peck and Weakly—14. Nays: Messrs. Cantrell, Cocke, Fort, Henderson, Lewis, Manifee! Rhea —7. Mr. Lewis entered the following protest: ‘To this question we enter our dissent, as we conceive the law to be an inferior species of per- secution, which is always a violation of the law of nature, and also Eat it is a violation of our constitution. Seth Lewis, John Cocke. William Fort, John Rhea, Stephen Cantrell, John Manifee, Thomas Henderson.” On the 16th of April this question came up in the Senate, where the following proceedings were had: “Ordered that this bill be read, which being read was on motion rejected.” On the 22d of April, both houses of the General Assembly being convened in the representatives’ chamber, proceeded to ballot for four electors to elect a President and Vice-Pres- ident of the United States, when the following gentlemen were chosen: Daniel Smith, Joseph Greer, Hugh Neilson and Joseph Anderson. Attor- neys-general were also similarly elected on the same day; for Washing- ton District, Hopkins Lacey; Hamilton District, John Lowrey; Mero District, Howell Tatum. The above mentioned action of the General Assembly, in electing four electors, was in accordance with a law passed by which it was provided that the General Assembly should, from time to time, by joint ballot, elect the number of electors required by the constitution of the United States. The error was in supposing that the State was entitled to two representatives in Congress as well as two Senators, and in accordance with this supposition an act was passed April 20, 1796, dividing the State in two divisions, the first to be called the Holston Division, and to be composed of the districts of Washington and Hamilton; the second to be called Cumberland Division, to be composed of Mero District; each of which divisions should be entitled to elect one representative to Congress. 14~ as HH fea ieiit | Pati ii} Led + spat | oR 1H if jae SHAE 4 net Ape ys ria ri} ee ERE APE | (Pe yy OTe RP sanell ph: et , ' Vee hy Be Earth es Wr Pe hy te AT E eluent iH i . i mba Bee iE - Bell epaiy tt il et ai Bean hi ee petra bata) Ee Bb Sat ae { tea i iH hi | a Rt | i Wit n i F He | ! He Perel s Pate pal Ty % Reh Pee ellf ot Le Hip Pee TeeeE il A Bh rea nile i Ppt ' Re hit i] | re Piib ae rint kf i i Hf Ge Pp 1 q Ee | j A} nine S EEE Menth ill f fh ri i Hh | i ee ieee TI Ube | eit a {] { 1. DEE | | att ri 1H Pe : bi wR a nant | Le i weit Brel pi Hub He Hii mi i iii i | Hl | Ra 4 ae EAH | ' TE wae lf | ' i i He a) ‘4 ie | a ; i i , ‘ PPB al -f TG , as BLE a bh eH a HiT ral 4 f fide ? ; i) We ty i Nt : ay F t : thi CO Ki iki ae ret AME HI ii Y So ig i He Hh Wee ih pea ae Lit j : rs P a H ) pat [ ea iE () ran he ij Ta a a i r ai | i} f 5 ¥ t fell Mh ra lh - fa : iit i Hil ee ty SAE Ae ual i eae We Ze ay mie t ROO lok Lats me HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. as entitled to only one representa- a ee When it was learned that Tennessee W , : lature in extra session Sevier convened the Legis tive in Congress, Goy. ! 28510 ose of making an alteration in te meet on the 30th of July for the pur} the act directing the mode ot electing re 7 : by a late act of Congress the intended number of our representatives 1s diminished, of course it proportionably lessens our number of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States.” ation and the recommendations of the governor, he following law: presentatives to Congress; ‘‘for In accordance with the necessities of the situ the Lecislature on the 3d of August, passed t << Be it enacted, etc.: That an election shall be held at the respective court houses in each county in this State on the first Tuesday in October next and on the day next succeeding, to elect one representative to represent this State in the Congress of the United States. In an act passed October 8 provision was made for the election of elec- for the districts of Washington, Hamilton and Mero, one for each dis- tors erict. William Blount and William Cocke were again elected senators to Congress, and under the President and Vice-President, the State was divided into three districts, Washington, Hamilton and Mero, and three persons from each county in each: district were named to elect the elector for their respective districts. The electors named in the act were to meet at Jonesborough, Knoxville, and Nashville, and elect an elector for each district, and the three elec- hus elected were to meet at Knoxville on the first Wednesday in December, ‘‘to President and Vice-President of the United States, pursuant to an act of Congress. Andrew Jackson was elected representative from Tennessee to the Congress of the United States, and when that body assembled at Philadelphia, December 5. 1799, Mr. Jack- act providing for the election of electors of tors t elect a som appeared and took his seat. On the 31st of January, 1797, an act was passed by Congress giving effect to the laws of the United States within the State of Tennessee. By the second section of this act the State was made one district, the district court therein to consist of one judge who was required to hold four sessions annually, three months apart, and the first to be held on the first Monday of April, the sessions to be held alternately at Knox- ville and Nashville. This judge was to receive an annual compensation of $800. By the fourth section of this act, the entire State of Tennessee was made one collection district, the collector to reside at Palmyra, “which shall be the only port of entry or delivery within the said district of any goods, wares and merchandise, not the growth or manufacture of the United States; and the said collector shall have and exercise all the powers which any other collector hath, or may legally exercise for col- lecting the duties aforesaid; and in addition to the fees by law provided,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 22:3 shall be paid the yearly compensation of one hundred dollars.” At the election of August, 1797, John Sevier was again elected governor; and ~ a Legislature, consisting of eleven senators and twenty-two representa- tives from the thirteen counties then in existence, was chosen. Grainger and Hawkins sent Joseph McMinn, Senator, and Robertson and Mont- gomery sent James Ford. James White was elected speaker of the Sen- ate; George Roulstone, principal clerk; and N. Buckingham, assistant clerk; James Stuart was elected speaker of the House; Thomas H. Will- iams, clerk; Jesse Wharton, assistant clerk, and John Rhea. door-keeper. On the 3d of December, 1798, the second session of the Second Gen- eral Assembly convened at Knoxville. James Robertson was elected senator in place of Thomas Hardeman, who had resigned. William Blount appeared from Knox County in place of James White, resigned. William Blount was elected speaker of the Senate, George Roulstone, clerk, and N. Buckingham assistant clerk. It was at this session of the Legislature that the number of senators was increased to twelve and the number of representatives to twenty-four by a law passed January dD, 1799. Section 2 of the act provided that there should be four sen- ators and eight representatives from Washington District. Washington and Carter Counties were made one senatorial district, and Sullivan, Greene and Hawkins Counties each had one senator, while Carter and Hawkins Counties each had one representative, and Washington, Sulli- van and Greene each had two. Hamilton District was divided as fol- lows: Knox and Grainger each had one senator, Blount and Sevier had one, and Jefferson and Cocke one; Knox and Grainger had two representa- tives each, while the other counties in the district had one each. Mero District—Davidson County had two senators and three representatives; Sumner County one senator and three representatives; and Robertson and Montgomery Counties one senator from both counties and one rep- resentative from each. The first session of the General Assembly elected according to the provisions of this act began at Knoxville, September 16, 1799. Alexander Outlaw was chosen speaker of the Senate, and John Kennedy, clerk. William Dickson was chosen speaker of the House, and Edward Scott, clerk. The first constitution of Tennessee had been so wisely constructed as to subserve its purpose for forty years without urgent necessity being felt for its revision. But in 1833, in response to a demand in various directions, for its amendment, the Legislature passed an act, under date of November 27, providing for the calling of a convention. ‘The act pro- vided that the convention should consist of sixty members, who should be elected on the first Thursday and Friday of March following, and thatFaiersinscetan bart cee lignan seeccige Pme ee — = oto patna SOA a ee eae ee oe wm oe ern oman po ee SES sees. Le D924 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ++ should meet at Nashville on the third Monday of May. ‘The conven tion having assembled May 19, 1834, Willie Blount, of Montgomery County, was made temporary chairman, and immediately. afterward Will- iam B. Carter, the delegate from Carter County, was elected president. Mr. Carter, in the course of his speech acknowledging the honor con- ferred upon him, said ‘‘the great principle which should actuate each indi- vidual in this convention is to touch the constitution with a cautious and circumspect hand. and to deface that instrument, formed with so much wisdom and foresight by our ancestors, as little as possible, and should there be in that sacred charter of liberty some articles or features of doubtful policy, prudence requires that we should better let it remain than to launch it into a sea of uncertainty when we cannot perhaps better ‘ts condition.” The Rev. James C. Smith, of the Cumberland Presby- terian Church of Nashville, pronounced a solemn and appropriate prayer. William K. Hill was made secretary of the convention, and William I. I. Morrow assistant secretary, the latter by a yea and nay vote of fifty-one to nine. Ministers of the gospel and editors of Tennessee newspapers were admitted to seats within the bar of the house. Various committees were appointed, each committee to bring forward amendments on some specific department of the constitution—the first the Bill of Rights, the second the Judicial Department, the third the Legislature, ete. The Bill of Rights in the new constitution remained substantially the same as 1n the old. Its position was changed from that of the eleventh article to that of the first, and the first change was in the seventeenth section, from which is the following sentence: “Suits may be brought against the State in such manner and in such courts as the Legislature may by law direct, provided the right of bringing suit be limited to citizens of this State,” the proviso being omitted. In the nineteenth section the sentence “and in all indictments for libels the jury shall have a right to determine the law and the facts, under the direction of the court, as in other cases,” the word ‘‘criminal” was inserted in the last phrase, so as to cause it to read ‘“‘as in other criminal cases.” Section 26, reading that ‘the freemen of this State shall have a right to keep and bear arms for the common defense,” was changed so as to read that “the free white men,” etc. Section 31, describing the boundaries of the State, was amended by the following additional words: ‘And provided also that the limits and jurisdiction of this State shall extend to any other lands and territory now acquired or that may hereafter be acquired by compact or agreement with other States or otherwise, al- though the land and territory are not included within the boundaries hereinbefore designated.”HISTORY OF TENNESSEE, | | | 4 ~~ 7 = \y - . / . ; . 3 ¢ s { In the constitution proper, Article I in the old constitution became ] Article II in the new, and two new sections were prefixed thereto. | These new:sections provided that the government should be divided into three distinct departments, Legislative, Executive and Judicial, and that no person belonging to one of these departments should exercise any of the powers belonging to either of the others except in certain specified cases. Section 4 of this second article provides that an enumeration of the qualified voters should be made every ten years, commencing in 1841, instead of an enumeration of the taxable inhabitants every seven years, and Section 5 provides that representatives shall be appointed according to the number of qualified voters instead of the taxable inhabi- tants, and the number of representatives was limited to seventy-five until the population of the State became 1,500,000, and after that event the number should never exceed ninety-nine, and the number of senators was limited to one-third of the number of representatives. Under the ite old constitution no man was eligible to a seat in the General Assem- | bly unless he possessed, in his own right, at least 200 acres of land. From the new constitution this requirement was omitted. Section 20, Article I, of the old constitution limited the pay of legislators to $1.75 per day, and no more than that sum for every twenty-five miles of travel to and from the place of meeting. This was changed in the new consti- tution so that each member was allowed $4 per day, and $4 for every twenty-five miles of travel to and from the seat of government. In the old constitution the governor was required to possess a free- hold estate of 500 acres of land, and to have been a citizen of the State four years. In the new constitution he was required to be at least thirty years of age, to be a citizen of the United States, and to have been a citizen of Tennessee at least seven years next preceding the election, the property qualification being omitted. The article on the qualifications of electors was changed so as to read ‘“‘every free white man of the age of twenty-one years, being a citizen of the United States, and of the Ey county wherein he may offer to vote six months next preceding the day of election, shall be entitled to vote for members of the General Assem- | bly and other civil officers for the county or district in which he may re- ik side; provided that no person shall be disqualified from voting at any election on account of color who is now by the laws of this State a com- petent witness in the courts of justice against a white man. A free man | of color shall be exempt from military duty in time of peace, and also ji from paying a free poll tax.” Section 3 of article IX was entirely | new, and read: ‘‘Any person who shall fight a duel, or knowingly be the A bearer of a challenge to fight a duel, or send or accept a challenge forSn eee - ‘ Se ao : “f eT ete ai 7 _ aa a een co = eo see a i ~ = —— idan «mate pstmt ak = “ S = a a 226 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. that purpose, or be an aider and abettor in fighting a duel, shall be de- prived of the right to hold any office of honor or profit = this State. The new constitution established a supreme court for the State, and pro- vided that this court should consist of three judges, one of whom should reside in each of the three grand divisions of the State, the concurrence of two of whom was necessary in every case to a decision. It also pro- vided for their term of office and salary. The above are the principal changes made in the ‘old constitution by the convention of 1834. Its labors terminated August 30, after passing” an ordinance for an election to be held on the first Thursday and Friday of March, 1835, on the question of adopting the constitution it had pre- pared. A curious provision of this ordinance was as follows: ‘‘That no person shall be deemed a qualified voter in said election except such as are included within the provisions of the first section of the fourth arti- cle of the amended constitution,’ according to which only free white men were allowed to vote. Thus the convention itself assumed the right and exercised the power of adopting for the people a portion of the con- stitution, the whole of which it was preparing to submit to them for their ratification or rejection. This proceeding was doubtless extra-judicial, but was defensible, if at all, on the ground that the free colored men who had hitherto exercised the right of suffrage, would most probably vote against their own disfranchisement, and thus, perhaps, render doubtful the fate of the constitution. The amended constitution was. submitted to the people March 5 and 6, and was ratified by them by a vote of 42,666 for the constitution to 17,691 against it. According to the census of 1830 there were then in the State 4,511 free colored per- sons, or about 900 who, under the old constitution, were entitled to vote, which number had probably increased to 1,000 at the time of the adop- tion of the amended constitution. The session of the convention lasted about three months and its delib- erations were characterized by great earnestness, patriotism and intelli- gence. The future good of the State was kept constantly in view, and the care and caution and eyen jealousy with which proposed changes were scrutinized are sufficiently indicated by the method adopted in their discussion each section being read, considered and voted upon four times before finally disposed of. But its crowning work was its estimate placed upon the value of education, and provision made for the perpetu- ity of the fund for the support of common schools. This estimate is clearly and forcibly expressed in the following language: ‘Knowledge, learning and virtue being essential to the preservation of Republican institutions, and the diffusion of the opportunities and advantages ofHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Don education throughout the different portions of the State being highly conducive to the promotion of this end, it shall be the duty of the Gant eral Assembly in all future periods of this Government to charted litera- ture and science.”” ‘The provision made for the perpetuity of the common school fund, and the development of the educational facilities under the new constitution are discussed and set forth in the chapter on education. In 18538 this constitution was so amended as to provide for the elec- tion of the judges of the supreme court by the qualified voters of the State at large, and of the judges of the inferior courts by the qualified voters of the district to which such judges were assigned. An attorney- general for the State and attorney for the districts and circuits were ho be elected in the same manner instead of by the Legislature. Before the conclusion of the civil war, a convention met at Nashville, January 9, 1865, and completed its labors on the 26th of the same month. By this convention the following amendments were framed and submitted fo the people That slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, are hereby forever abolished and prohibited throughout this State. The Legislature shall make no law recognizing the right of property in man. Other amendments were made abrogating certain features of the constitution of 1834. so as to make it consistent with the above amend- ments, and also declaring treasonable, unconstitutional, null and void, the declaration of independence of Tennessee, and the ordinance dis- solving the Federal relations between Tennessee and the United States of America, passed and promulgated May 6, 1861. The present constitution was prepared by a convention held in Nash- ville January, 1870, and which ended its labors February 23, 1870. The first change made was in Article I, Section 4, which in the constitu- tion of 1834 reads: ‘No religious test shall ever be required as a qualifi- vation to any office or public trust under this State.’ In the constitution of 1870 this section reads, ‘“‘ No political or religious test, other than an oath to support the constitution of the United States and of this State, shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under this State.” Section 5 of this article, ‘That elections shall be free and equal,” was amended by adding the following words: “And the right of suffrage, as heretofore declared, shall never be denied to any per- son entitled thereto, except upon conviction hy a jury of some infamous crime, previously ascertained and declared by law and judgment thereon by a court of competent jurisdiction.” Section 6, reading “That the right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate,’ was amended by adding928 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. “and no religious or political test shall ever be required as a qualifica- Section 8, “That no free man shall be taken or ’ ete., was tion for “jurors.” imprisoned or disseized of his freehold, liberties or privileges,’ Section 18 was amended so as oe “e — wo — 2 Oe oe — aN ss PL Renin 4 _ rene TLE Wh = a al ; , = cneesares - z * 1 bs | ; ne ve amended by omitting the word “free.” to read: “The Legislature shall pass no law authorizing imprisonment for (oe epee = ne oe Saree arene vee debt in civil cases.” In the legislative department of the constitution, important changes were made. Counties and incorporated towns were forbidden to lend their credit to, or to become stockholders in, any incorporation, except upon a three-fourths majority of the vote cast at an election upon the question, and the credit of the State was forbidden to be given to any company, incorporation or municipality. No bonds of the State can be issued to any railroad company, which at the time of its application for the same is in default in payment of interest upon the State bonds previously loaned to it, or that previously to such application shall have sold any State bonds loaned to it at less than par. In the executive department the principal change made was in conferring upon the governor the veto 1 Tee — Se Cras Ene as power. The qualifications of electors were so changed as to confer the suffrage on every male person of the age of twenty-one years, resident in the State one year and in the county six months who had paid his poll tax. ‘The supreme court was changed so as to consist of five judges instead of three, of whom not more than two may reside in any one of the grand divisions of the State. The judges themselves are required to elect one of their own number chief justice. One of the miscellaneous provisions of the present constitution is as follows: ‘The Legislature shall have no power to authorize lotteries for any purpose, and shall pass laws to prohibit the sale of lottery tick- ets within this State.’ A provision was also inserted under which each head of a family is entitled to a homestead of the value of $1,000, ex- empt trom sale for debt, except for public taxes and the purchase price of the homestead, which may be retained by the widow and minor chil- dren so long as occupied by them. The intermarriage of white persons with negroes or mulattoes, or persons of mixed blood descending from a negro to the third generation inclusive, is prohibited under fe consti- tution. The vote on the ratification of this new constitution was taken March 26, 1870, and resulted.as follows: For the constitution, 98,128: against it, 33,872. In East Tennessee, 15,678: against it, 17,155. Middle Tennessee, 48,503; against it, 7,190. West Tennessee, 33,947; against it, 9,527. 2 ee aera <7 =HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. stale wiles, WIVUC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT—IMPERFECT AGRICULTURAL METHODS—PRODUC- TIONS FOR MARKET—SUPPLY FOR HOME CONSUMPTION—ADOPTION OF IM- PROVED AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS—COMPARISON OF THE THREE GRAND DIVISIONS OF THE STATE IN CROPS AND PROGRESS—THE STAPLE PRODUCTS— THE GREAT RANGE OF PRODUCTIONS AND THE REASON—FRUIT, GRAIN, To- BACCO, CoTTON, PEANUTS, HAy, HEMP, FLAx, SORGHUM, LIVE-STOCK AND MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS—INTRODUCTION OF THE COTTON-GIN—PURCHASE OF THE PATENT BY THE LEGISLATURE—THE LABOR QUESTION AND THE COST OF PRODUCTION—FERTILIZATION AND STATISTICS. ENNESSEE is so happily situated geographically and topographic- ally that her fields yield in greater or less abundance nearly every product of the temperate zones, and it is doubtful if any other State in the Union possesses equal agricultural resources. Yet the condition of acriculture in the State has not been so prosperous as the nature of the soil the variety of the products and the salubrity of the climate should insure. This is due partly to the agricultural methods, which have been in the main quite primitive, and partly to the fact that in Middle and West Tennessee especially, the attention of farmers has been directed to one or two crops to the almost utter exclusion of all others. It is true that before the war these farmers were the most thriving in the State and. that many of their farms were in a high state of cultivation and improve- ment, but this mode of agriculture could succeed and prove profitable only under a well regulated and well disciplined system of slave labor. The great civ il convulsion which overturned the social system of the South wrought most disastrous changes among the land owners and. farmers, and many years have been required for them to recover from the effects, and to adapt themselves to the new condition of society. There is a widely marked and striking difference in the three divis- ‘ons of the State in the economical management of the farmers. The most distinguishing characteristic of the average farmer in Kast T'ennes- see is the effort which he makes to supply what may be required for his own consumption. It is not uncommon on a small farm to see a patch of cotton, which the women of the household work up into cloth; a spot given to tobacco for home See a field of sorghum, from which *C ee fied from Killebrew’s ‘“‘Resources of Tennessee,” “Rev ised Hand Book of Tennessee,’’ census and other reports, and collected by the writer from numerous original and reliable sources.mh oa lager eval — cena han ee a2 (Nd repeat le gpa eens a eee cage mere tose em ea a — ~ = > naeeee = : : ee 7 = - = _~ - = ae pp ae — Seer el ——- pa = aed PS oe ee +a ee eo eee ee aa ——— ee a a ——— — = = “ = : room Zs 0 ~ S pielintaeeonreen a a a * Se gerrrecrs EES = 930 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. stic use; 7 acres *heat are raised for flour; syrup is made for domestic use; a few acres of wheat at . corn and oats or hay to feed the stock, which usually consist of a few sheep, to supply wool for winter clothes; cows, erived by the manufacture of butter, and a brood-mare from which a consider- able revenue is d or two. from which the farmer rears his mules and horses for farm use. Besides these an abundance of the staple vegetables and of all kinds of poultry are raised. A few bee-hives and an apple and peach orchard are the necessary adjunct to nine-tent The most striking fact in the farming operations of that division is that Tobacco, cotton, corn and hay are all grown in hs of the farms in East Tennessee. no money crop is raised. : small quantities, not so much for sale as for use. ‘The amount of money realized by the average farmer of Hast Tennessee is exceedingly small, and yet ERG people in no portion of the State live so well or have their tables so bountifully furnished. Many a farmer, who lives like a lord at his table, does not realize $200 in money from his farm in a year, and this comes mainly from the sale of feathers, chickens, eggs, dried fruit and occasionally a few cattle or mules. Indeed, with their strict habits of economy, they have but little use for money. The wool and cotton, by the patient industry of the female members of the family, are wrought into cloth. A few hides from the beeves are tanned and made into. shoes. Salt, coffee and sugar comprise almost the sum total of pur- chases, while a few dollars are required to meet the demands of the tax- gatherer. The use of improved machinery, except in the valley lands, is impos- sible on the farms in Hast Tennessee; consequently the implements are very inexpensive, and are frequently made at the neighboring blacksmith shop. ‘The valley farms, however, are usually supplied with all the ma- chinery to be found upon the best farms in the other portions of the State. The growing of corn and wheat for a long period in East Tennes- see, without proper rotation, resting or clovering, has greatly impaired the fertility of the soil; yet there is no better land anywhere for clover, and the rich, red ferruginous subsoils, resting in the valleys on the lime- stone rock, are susceptible of being kept up to a high point of fertility if properly managed. Although a small minority of the farmers are content to plant, work and gather their crops just as did their fathers and grandfathers before them, under the lead of a few intellicent farm- ers, and the inspiration of the East Tennessee Farmers’ Convention. great changes for the better have been wrought within the past few years. Improved breeds of cattle, sheep and hogs, and better methods of cultiva- tion have been pretty generally introduced. When this spirit of progress and improvement shall have become general, East Tennessee will rivalHISTOBY OF TENNESSEE. 231 any other portion of the Union in the variety and wealth of its agricult- ural products. Unlike his brother in East Tennessee, the farmer of the middle division, especially in the Central Basin and the richer portions of the Highlands, aims to have in addition to the food crops, a “money crop” of either tobacco, cotton or peanuts. His anxiety is greater to secure the former than the latter, for his domestic habits are not such as to enable him to dispense with money to the same extent as the farmer of Hast Tennessee. As a usual rule, except in places remote from town, he does not’manufacture his clothes at home, but buys them. He does not pay as much attention to the smaller industries, nor is his every day table suppled with such a variety of food. Milk and butter he usually pro- duces in abundance for home consumption, but unless m the dairy busi- ness he does not aim to produce a surplus for market. While his orchards may cover more acres, his orchard products are less remunera- tive. Fowls are raised in large quantities, but the money for them belongs to the housewife, and does not enter into his bills receivable. His thoughts center in his money crops, and everything, even the appear- ance of his farm, must yield to the imperative demands of such crops. He feels no disappointment at having no corn or pork to sell. He aims to make a supply. If there is a surplus he rejoices, if not, he remains contented. Heknowsand appreciates the value of labor-saving machinery, and his farm is usually well supplied with the best of implements. His work-stock are the best his purse will enable him to buy. He also inherits a love for a good saddle horse. He rejoices in a good cotton- gin, or tobacco screw, gin house or tobacco barn, and will take infinitely more pains to exhibit these than he will his dwelling, although his dwelling may be tasteful and elegant in its surroundings, He is fond too of a good stable, with a bounteous supply of provender, though stables and everything else must yield to the exactions of his ‘‘money crop.” Ifa stock raiser, everything is subordinated to that, it being the “money crop.’ ‘The possession of a heavy purse once a year is the dream of his existence. Energetic, thoughtful, intelligent and pains- taking, he prospered under a different condition of things. He prospers yet, when able to take the front row or to carry on his farm in a system- atic and orderly manner. He 1s not so careful of his land now as before the war; he does not value it so highly. He can be tempted to rent out fields that in the regular order should be rested. Sometimes his clover seed runs short, and he prefers to let the unsown fields lie fallow rather than to incur further expense. He is not so particular about having his fence eorners clean as formerly. He is in a manner disheartened because hePe — ~ - ~—-— - =: = — : a niet ratt eee cmmeeneeeEnerapcreespemmremeaaarmerees eee eee nee aye HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ho : L can rely upon no regular supply of labor. His enthusiasm 1s greatly chilled by the course of events, and yet he will confess that in a good season with good hands his profits are as great and as satisfactory as ever. | The farms in Middle Tennessee, as a general thing, are much better improved than in the other divisions. The dwelling houses are good, many of them elegant, some of them princely. entral basin are the favorite branches of industry. Fine Stock raising and cotton growing in this ¢ stock, horses, cattle, hogs and s be found in every county. On the Highlands surrounding the basin, peanuts, tobacco. wheat and fruits are the favorite crops. ‘The average farmer of lower West Tennessee aspires to be a planter. He loves to see many broad acres in cultivation. He is ambitious, industrious, care- He cares for nothing so much as to see his cotton heep of the most approved breeds are to less and energetic. fields flourishing. maintains that he can buy them cheaper than he ean make them. Debt has no such terrors for him as for the East Tennessee farmer. He will He does not try to raise his supplies, but stoutly stake his all upon the prospects for cotton; chicken, eggs, butter, corn, wheat, hay, meat—all these are little things and cotton will buy them. Cotton is the great mogul of all the crops. It controls all and buys all. Land, teams, tools are as nothing, compared with the lordly bales rolled out from the gin house. Gullies may wash, fences may rot, houses may fall to decay, but cotton must be raised. A big crop of cotton will buy fresh fields with virgin soil elsewhere. Taking care of land and resting it may do for the farmer elsewhere, but time is too valuable to be wasted in this way by the average West Tennessee farmer. He can and does spend money for fertilizers, and they are used where the cotton crop will get the full benefit. He will crop out his land, or rent it out, payable in cotton, but rarely in money. He is inclined to be more cosmopolitan than his brothers of the other divisions, yet he cherishes a high regard for his State, but would ‘cherish it still more, if it would produce more cotton. In the more northern counties of West Tennessee, however, the average farmer is very much like the Middle Tennessee farmer. He has his money crop, but he takes an interest in working supplies enough for home consumption. He is careful of his soil, and feeds and Te OCen with clover. He takes great delight in his corn crop until his tobacco plants begin to press him, then the corn must stand second in his affec- tions. He loves his hay fields, but his tobacco fields better. He is fond of rich soil and studies the aptitudes and capacities of the different vari- eties, and plants his various crops so that each may haye the most econ-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 233 genial soil. There is no better farmer in the State than the farmer of northern West Tennessee. He raises a surplus of all food crops, but pays little attention to the smaller industries. He is fond of good stock . * . os = ; : f a Y 2 especially good hogs, which his magnificent corn crops enable him to rear in great quantities. He keeps up his improvements and has a lively faith in the future of the State. The many varieties of soil and the difference of elevation give to Ten- nessee a very wide range in its agricultural products. Assuming that an elevation of 333 feet is equivalent, so far as temperature is concerned to one degree of latitude. it will be seen that the highest elime of the y . . ) 2 . . + . Unakas in the East differ from the low lands of the Mississipp1 by near- ly fifteen degrees of latitude; the one having a semi-tropical climate and the other that of Canada. The soils do not differ less than the climate. Upon them can be grown the sweet potato of the South and the Irish potato of the North, both in remunerative quantities, and of excellent quality. Peaches that attain their luscious sweetness in a sunny climate find in the State a congenial home, where they are brought to their high- Apples, upon the elevated lands, bear as profusely and est perfection. region of Ohio or ripen as deliciously as in the great apple growing Michi f many varieties bear 1n unsurpassed luxurlance up- on the apricots, pears, nectarines and Even the fig, in sheltered places, may be brought to maturity fusion. in the open air. ‘Those more common, but not less useful fruits, the shout the blackberry, raspberry and the dewberry are indigenous throug State. In the woods and in the fields, on poor soil and on rich, covering the mountain tops and flourishing in the alluvial bottoms, the blackber- es a rich, healthy and delicious fruit, and in quantities So numerous and oN an. Grapes oO sunny slopes and rich hills in every part of the State. Plums, cherries flourish and yield in pro- oO © ry bush suppli sufficient to supply ten times the present population. the berries, that pickers are sent out from Cincinnati sg excellent are The rasp- and from other northern towns to gather and ship the fruit. berry and dewberry grow wild, and yield abundantly. The cranberry crows wild in the elevated swampy places of Johnson County, and but oo for want of facilities for transportation could be made a source of great perhaps, be ranked profit. Of the great staple products, corn should, first, although as a “money crop” it is subordinate to both cotton and Tennessee now ranks ninth as a corn growing State. In 1840 she stood first. The average annual production of this cereal is not far from 50,000,000 bushels. The great central basin of Middle Tennessee, and the low lands of West Tennessee raise enor- greatly superior to that grown tobacco. the rich valleys of East, mous crops of this eran and the quality is cacyeT y rae a : * I See a em ee het ahiod li ye SO = aiiehcinmametins dun attenenia: ieiatiee caeaee a. cles iia a Ae AIIM een AN eu) ge A Q24 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. i+ The crai atures earlier than in the North in higher or lower latitude. The grain matures ea ae if itt ake a superior ality OL meal, anc and dries thoroughly, fitting it to make a superior quality eg ee _ MV aaa eral G er acre tor the itis noted for its freedom from rot. The average ylé ld a ee = i ; shels; is average is low, due to the State is about twenty-three bushels; but this average 1 | pernicious habit in some parts of the State of planting the same land year after year in this exhaustive crop without manure. Among the 1 ; i od at44 AT © 1 § > T “7 xr : o, ‘ Te rE re T e best farmers, those who practice rotation and clovering, the 2 rage yield is not far from forty bushels. The rent paid for some of the bottom | see, 1s twenty « sometimes thirty bushels of lands on the upper Tennessee, 1s tw enty and sometimes vhirty UI S corn per acre, and the yield often reaches seventy-five, and in some rare instances, 100 bushels per acre. Of the cereals, wheat ranks next In importance to corn. quantity of wheat raised varies from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 bushels, The usual with a large average yield per acre. About 1,000,000 acres are sown annually. : The best wheat growing portions of the State are to be found in the upper counties of the valley of Hast Tennessee, the COs ae ing on the north side of the Highland Rim, the northern counties of West Tennessee, and the rolling lands of the central basin. The average yield in these regions is not far from fifteen bushels. Though the yield of wheat is far from being what a thorough preparation of the land and early seeding could make it, yet the excellence of the berry compensates in some degree for the scantiness in the yield. The flour made of Tennes- see wheat commands in every market a superior price. It has been esti- mated that at least one-half of the flour exported to Brazil and other inter-tropical countries is manufactured from wheat grown south of the Ohio and Susquehanna Rivers. There is a peculiarity in the flour which enables it to resist damp, and it remains fresh and sweet when flour made from wheat grown in high latitudes becomes sour and worth- less. It also has the sapacity of absorbing more water, and retaining it in the baking process, giving a greater number of pounds of bread for a given number of pounds of flour. All the nutritive elements are fully developed in the wheat of Tennessee, and, maturing a month earlier than the wheat crop of New York, it commands a ready market at good prices. The annual production of oats in Tennessee amounts to about ),000,- 000 bushels. The best authorities put the yield at sixteen bushels per acre, but the primitive methods employed in separating the straw from the grain leave a large portion of the latter adhering to the straw. Twenty-five bushels per acre can be grown upon any soils in any portion of the State that have not been impoverished by bad tillage. Even upon the thin, barren, flat lands that are found in some portions of Lewis, Ty’ a - € f + AC = y « a . it > ie LS ” Lawrence, Coffee and other counties, oats grow with a prodigal luxuri-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 235 ance, as also upon the sand-stone soils of the Cumberland Table-land. Upon the richer valley and bottom lands fifty bushels per acre are not an extraordinary yield, and seventy-five have been made. Greene, Hawkins, Knox, Sullivan, Roane, Washington and Blount Counties in East Ten- nessee; Davidson, Wilson, Montgomery and Sumner in the middle divis- ion, and Obion, Dyer and Gibson in West Tennessee furnish the best soils for oats. While the number of acres devoted to barley in the State does not exceed 5,000, it is yet one of the most profitable crops grown by the farmer. The average yield per acre is about eighteen bushels. About one-third of all that is grown in the State is raised in Davidson County. It flourishes well in the high valleys and coves in Johnson and Carter Counties, and would grow well in all the rich valley lands of Hast Ten- nessee. The black lands of the central basin yield very large crops, twenty-five to thirty-five bushels being quite common. Rye is not considered a productive crop in Tennessee. Farmers rarely sow it, except for winter or early spring grazing, a use to which it is admirably adapted. It is used also to some extent as a fertilizer, and as it grows with vigor where corn, oats and wheat fail, it supplies a great want upon the thin and worked soils. The amount of land in the State devoted to rye is about 25,000 acres, which gives a yield of about 220,000 bushels, or about nine bushels per acre. This yield is doubtless largely diminished in consequence of the excessive grazing to which it is subjected. The largest rye-growing counties are Marshall, Lincoln, Rutherford, Bedford and Davidson in Middle Tennessee, and Johnson and Carter in East Tennessee. West Tennessee raises but little rye, yet its soil and climate would insure an abundant yield. Only a small amount of buckwheat is grown by the farmers of Ten- nessee. About 60,000 bushels is the average crop of the State, grown principally in Johnson, Carter, Washington and Perry Counties. It is not a remunerative crop, yielding only about seven bushels per acre. From the early settlement to the present time, sweet potatoes have formed one of the leading articles of food. They grow well in all thoroughly drained soils of the State, and where the land is friable and moderately fertile. Bottom lands are not usually the best for the growth of this vegetable; the tendency of such places is to produce an enormous erowth of vines at the expense of the tubers; nor does cold, clayey land sai them. The flavor is greatly improy ed in a soil with a small admix- ture of sand or fine gravel. When grown upon very rich land they are apt to be sappy and insipid. The annual yield is about 1,200,000 bushels, or 100 bushels per acre. The counties raising the greatestpean ee sateen ae ro wpa empties 9g Bem a : pace meee pent ween as cael ee £ pie t 7 ENE Tin Sin, RERRE ~ ‘ = Pp - - LRT A nr ae ae ~~ = en ee ES oe Sa er ae ee eae i Pe hese aes 936 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. quantities are Shelby, Obion and Gibson in West Tennessee Davidson. Wilson and Montgomery in the Middle Division; and Knox, Bradley and Anderson in East Tennessee. Trish potatoes are not grown in sufficient quantities in the State to supply the home demand, although when planted upon suitable soils and well worked, the yield is prolific. Upon land moderately fresh and well fertilized, the yield can be brought up to 400 bushels per acre. Yet the statistics of Phie crop shows an average yield of only seventy-seven bushels, and the entire production 1,122,000 bushels. This vegetable eTOWS well in every division of the State, and especially is it brought to perfection in the more elevated portions. Even the Cumberland Table- land, though yielding sparsely of the leading crops, produces the Irish potato in profusion. Of the ‘‘money crops,” perhaps the most important is tobacco. In the production of this plant Tennessee stands third among the States, Kentucky being first and Virginia second. The average yield per acre is between 700 and 800 pounds, although as much as 1,200 and even as high as 1,800 can be grown on the best soils in favorable seasons. Grown in some of the soils of Kentucky and Tennessee, it acquires a peculiar richness. Tough, thick, gummy and leathery in its character, it has the capacity of absorbing water, which makes it peculiarly adapted to the manufacture of strips for the English market; the tobacco known as the “ Clarksville tobacco,” and which grows on the rich red soils of Stewart, Montgomery, Robertson, Cheatham and Dickson Counties, is capable of absorbing 33 per cent of its weight in water. It is prepared for the English market by pulling out the main. stem and packing it in hogs- heads as dry as possible. These ‘“‘strips” are watered after reaching the English market, and inasmuch as the duty on tobacco is about 72 cents per pound, every pound of water absorbed by the strips is 72 cents in the pocket of the importer, and he is thus enabled to sell per pound at the same price at which he buys and still make a handsome profit. It is this peculiar property that gives the Clarksville tobacco such a high rank among the English dealers. The upper parts of Sumner, Trousdale and Smith, all of Macon, Clay and Jackson, and parts of Overton, Putnam, Wilson and DeKalb, raise a kind of tobacco not well suited for the manufacturer. It is large, leafy, coarser than the Clarks- ville tobacco, and is deficient in the active principle. It is principally consumed in the French and Spanish markets, a small quantity going to Italy and Germany. Obion, Dyer, Henry, Weakley and Benton Counties raise a very fine manufacturing leaf. It is, indeed, the finest article for that purpose grown west of the Alleghany Mountains: It is rich, silky.HISTORY OF TENNESSER. 237 mild, of a light color, and some of it rivalling the brilliant colors of the fading hoe Vv leak, iti is especially valued for bright and mottled wrappers. All of this tobacco is consumed in the United States, none being exported on account of its high price and scarcity. This tobacco is not well adapted for stemming purposes, and even if it were, the price is too high to make its use in this manner profitable. Coffee, W arren, Moore, Lewis, Lawrence, W ayne, Hickman, Humphreys and Dickson, raise small quantities of light, mild tobacco. Nearly every county 1 East Tennessee grows enough for home consumption, and but little more. The quality of tobacco differs widely from that grown in the other divis- ions of the State. It is smaller and lighter, and not so rich in nicotine. The stronger tobaccos of Middle and West Tennessee contain as high as six per cent of that alkaloid, while that grown in East Tennessee does not contain above three per cent. It, however, is preferred by many on this account, being milder, pleasanter and more agreeable. The history of tobacco cultivation in Tennessee dates back to its ear- ltest settlement. The pioneers who settled in the fertile valleys of the Watauga, Nollichucky, and Holston Rivers, raised tobacco for their own consumption; and those who planted colonies on the Cumberland during the last two decades of the eighteenth century brought seed from North Carolina and Virginia, and began its culture. Although grown for many years in a small way, it was not until about 1810 that tobacco began to form one of the great staples of the State. By 1820 7,000 hogsheads . were annually sent in flat-boats to New Orleans and exchanged for coffee, sugar, salt and other commodities. The extinguishment of Indian titles in West Tennessee, in 1818, added immensely to the available area for cultivation. Prices were generally low, but the cost of production was scarcely appreciable. It is estimated that during the decade from 1820 to 1830, the actual cost of growing tobacco Tal not exceed $1 per 100 pounds. From 1830 to 1840 the culture was widely extended. In the latter year Henry County, in West Tennessee, heads the list, reporting a yield of 9 9,479,065 pounds, over 1,000,000 pounds more than any county at the een time produces. Smith County came next, with 3,017,012 pounds; Sumner, 2,615,000; Montgomery, 2,549,984; Wilson, 2,313,000; Robertson, 1,168,833; Walloon 1,126,982; Rutherford: 1,084,000: and Stewart, Jackson and Davidson, 993,495, 859,336, and 334,394 pounds, respectively. The entire yield for the State in that year was 29,- 000,442 pounds, nearly 200,000 pounds more than was reported in the census of 1880. The prices which prevailed in 1837 were very low, and many planters shipping to New Orleans were brought into debt for freight and charges. During the next two years the prices increased, and from 4 to {Ssi i ; we i a Bie ff 4 4 bt : a! Boe i # pl ‘a # i j ih 2 Sia? at ; wae it U i & Tae fl af ti 7 Fh : ALPS, = —— --—--— Bi ate ae ae pee — amen _— en - Pe ae ng > ee a 235 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. - a = ; $2 ( a 1e0eC TATE | > 10 cents per pound was frequently paid. In 1839 the prices were higher From 1841 to 1846 the prices ranged than for several succeeding years. ount of the Mexican war, from 2 to 8 cents, but in the latter year, on ace " Tn 1850 fair prices again prevailed. the price fell to from 1 to 3 cents. About 1834 dealers began to put up factories 1n Clarksville, and to pur- ehase leaf tobacco. Soveral establishments for making “ strips”? sprang ap shortly thereafter, and 1n 1840 the number of stemmeries had consid- This gave renewed animation to the industry, millions erably increased. n Clarksville, and prepared of pounds of tobacco being annually bought 1 for the English trade. The first effort to establish a market for the sale of tobacco in Clarks- ville was made in 1842, but it was difficult to persuade such planters as still adhered to the practice of pressing the tobacco and shipping it to New Orleans, to consent to sell in Clarksville. It was not until Febru- 1e inspection and sale of tobacco in casks September 1, 1845, 900 hogsheads ary, 1840, that warehouses for tl were erected, and for the year ending were reported sold. Three or four warehouses were opened in 1846, and since that time they have been ‘nereased both in size and number. With the exception of Louisville, Clarksville opened the first inspection ware- house in the West. Nashville also was a point where some business was done in tobacco as early as 1835. In 1840 the receipts amounted to 4,000 hogsheads, and for the next ten years remained stationary, varying from 4.000 to 5,000 hogsheads annually. About 1850 two tobacco stemmeries were put up, which prepared from 129 to 150 hogsheads of strips; considerable leaf tobacco was also shipped to the New Orleans market. From L850 to 1860 the trade increased somewhat, reaching from 7,000 to 8,000 hogs- heads, the weight of the hogshead being increased about twenty per cent. During the war the tobacco trade in Nashville was suspended, and did not greatly revive until 1872. Paris, Henry County, is also a tobacco market of some importance. In 1880 it contained six factories, only three of which were in operation. These factories during that year put up about 208,000 pounds. In Clarksville, while the amount of sales varies somewhat with the success or partial failure of each crop, there is always a considerable amount sold loose to the factories for the manufacture of strips. In 1879 the number of hogsheads of strips was less than for many years. In that year five factories in operation reported an aggregate production of 544 hogsheads or 680,000 pounds of strips, although the usual amount ranges from 800 to 2,000 hogsheads. Springfield, in Robertson County, does a considerable business in stemming, and also in the manufacture of ow:HISTORY OF TENNESSER. 239 plug tobaccos. Nearly every town in the tobacco- growing region, espe- cially if it be on the railroad, contains one or more dealers who buy leaf tobacco, put it into hogsheads, and ship it to Clarksville, Nashville or Louisville. Cotton is another of the great staple products of Tennessee. Its cult. ivation, however, is mainly restricted to a comparatively small area, eighty-four per cent of the entire amount being produced in West Ten- nessee, and only one per cent of it in that portion of the State east of the Central Basin. In 1879 the county in the State havi ing the highest total production was Shelby, with 46,388 bales. The county having the highest average production per acre was Lake, with 1,059 pounds of seed cotton. ‘These counties of West Tennessee produce the best cotton grown in the State, and the farmers give to this staple almost their entire atten- tion. The uplands yield a very desirable article much sought after by the spinners of New England and Great Britain on account of its clean- ness. At the London exposition in 1851, the cotton raised by Col. John Pope, of Shelby County, received the medal as the best cotton known to the world. Lincoln, Rutherford, Giles, Williamson and Maury are the principal cotton-growing counties of Middle Tennessee, although it is produced to some extent in the whole of the Central Basin. The five counties mentioned in 1879 produced over 43,000 bales. The following are the counties of Tennessee producing the greatest quantity of this staple, together with the number of bales and the average yield per acre for 1879 the weight of the bales averaging about 475 pounds: Production Average bales in bales. per acre, Shel yar ae. ah semi: see as Se a ee ee a AOS 00 Bavettes i te ee een, ernie eee ieee ae 39,221 43 PLOW, eens des cee smc e ce ae cs re po es EAT .06 ET aY;WOOG. foe ee he Bok eens ly sien eee nis 23,092 46 GIDSON Ee wee tea ee ee 19,372 52 IMAGISONE ey eal ones hic sss hos ei ee LO ODT .42 Mardemany eee nce c nr a ee 8987 42 Mauderdglems a ee a een ee 13,250 00 GIS HA es a cee coe en oe i eee Tienes LoroUe 44 Rutherforde e200 30 ee 12,414 88 Carroll yee ve acticin ces cnc ee Oe ee ee 11,505 A FT ON GersO Migs rescence ou cterce cle’ sle Siete era in cei clocneporatr ice OF409 42 MCN SITY .0) oo ober os soit is Gas wisi Sheistee scree Ne este odes oe OIaLO Al @rockettser eee ie nee bar cidars cvercvos ues seems Succ Oo DOU 2 MAU Ypres eb cicicstue ales <= sles cioh craic. s/s a erapeccueusieee cue 8,912 41 DV Or sc aes s: ce cls asso sete cure ostiedeee ses (Op004 09 Weakley ar eect bie ay scct atom of seutncepaaene eee sci iyOR0 49 FR OUUY see heii Sag oe tS ne eis 4 Settee ease sk cay OSLO 42 VAT ONG ee ee cn nee ey ne 5,345 42 Whalliamsone yr ea ee oe i ee ee Ce= 240 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 4,225 58 Obion . aoe Wincolns..... 3,486 89 TERI re See leis rcs cpus sete Cor SCT eG 2,412 4 IOCATUTP Een wets weenie cee ieee secon he a .89 Renton es ee i aise eceineins oe es a Marshall... ie IavidsOMee 6 eee ero oe oes iniccic ce ie a Tacs er aT re eine io seo eieioes cre eaeln croieeinic cic co ale ee im WHISOMM er eee ce eee mega sae : ea ie WinvGRert coc cri ce- near ce eeiion ar aes 1,207 37 The remaining counties each produced less than 1,000 bales. Al- though the average yield per acre is one-half greater than that of Ala- bama, and equal even to that of Mississippi, it could be greatly increased with proper management. The estimated cost of production per acre, as furnished by eleven cotton growers in as many different counties, varies from $4.05 to $16.90 w ith an average of $11.43. This cost can be ma- terially reduced by cultivating less land and c sultivating it better, employ- ing less labor and thus increasing its efficiency, restoring the exhausted elements to the soil and thus keeping up its fertility, and by producing home supplies. It is probable that the cultivation of cotton for home consumption was begun with the first settlement of the State, but the amount raised must have been quite small. The first cotton grown west of the moun- tains by American settlers was planted by Gol. John Donelson in 1780, on the east side of Stone’s River, opposite Clover Bottom. Before the close of the Indian war fields of half an acre or an acre of cotton were to be seen at most of the ‘‘improvements”’ or settlements. The entire care of this crop at that time, from the planting of the seed to the slow and laborious process of seeding the cotton, devolved upon the women and children of the household. The invention of the gin by Whitney, in 1793, added impetus to the culture of cotton, although it was not until some time after that the machines came into general use. On October 22, 1808, the General Assem- bly of Tennessee passed an act, of which the following is the preamble: WHEREAS, It is proposed by Russell Goodrich, the agent of Elijah Whitney, the in- ventor and patentee of a machine for the cleaning of cotton from the seeds, commonly called the saw-gin, and Phineas Miller, the assignee of one moiety of the patent right to said machine, to sell to the State of Tennessee, the sole and exclusive right of making, using and vending the said machine w ithin the limits of this State, and WHEREAS the culture of cotton is increasing in this State, and, from the invention and use of said machine, likely to become a valuable staple article of exportation, it is expedient that the State of Tennessee do purchase from the said Miller and Whitney their patent right to the making, using and vending of the said new invention on the terms and conditions hereinafter mentioned, that is to say, that there shall be levied and collected by the State of Tennessee on each and every said gin which shall be used in the State from the passing of this act, thirty-seven and one-half cents upon each and everyHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 241 “saw or circular row of teeth, which shall be used in said gins in each and every year, for the term of four years, which tax, when collected, is to be paid to the said Miller and Whitney or their order, first deducting the sheriff's usual commission of six per cent for collecting from year to year for the term aforesaid. The first payment to be made on the first day of November, 1804, and the last payment on the first day of November, 1807. The total amount paid by the State for the use of the gin in the counties of Middle Tennessee, or Mero District, was $4,517.49, after deducting the sheriff's commission of $288.35. Gins were used in ten counties as follows: Davidson, twenty-four; Sumner, nine; Williamson, six; Montgomery, five; Robertson, five; Smith, five; Stewart, one; Dickson, one; Wilson, four, and Rutherford, four. The following statis- tics show the rapid increase in the production of cotton in Tennessee from the beginning of the century: The crop for the year 1801 was estimated at 1,000,000 pounds, and for 1811, at 3,000,000 pounds. Ten years later it had increased 20,000,000 pounds; in 1828, to 45,000,000 pounds, and in 1833, to 50,000,000 pounds. These amounts were only estimated how- ever, and for the last two or three periods, were undoubtedly placed too high, as the census of 1840 reports the crop for the previous year at 27,- 701,277 pounds. The crop for the next four decennial years was as follows: 1849, 194,532 bales; 1859, 296,464 bales; 1869, 181,842 bales, and for 1879, 330,621 bales. The great peanut growing region of the State embraces the counties of Perry, Hickman and Humphreys, and portions of Dickson and Lewis. The cultivation of this crop was introduced into this section by Jesse George, of Hickman County. The seeds came from North Carolina, and were given to him by some relatives, who were passing through the county on their way West. These he planted, and finding the county so well adapted to their growth he ventured to raise peanuts for market. Obtaining a good price for these he was stimulated to a larger planting. His neighbors caught the infection and Humphreys soon became famous for the richness and superiority of its peanuts. The entire production of this crop in the region mentioned above reached, in the year 1872, 680.000 bushels; of these Hickman raised 200,000; Humphreys, 250,000; Perry, 200,000, and Dickson, 30,000. The excessive production of that year reduced the price so low that the crop in 1873 was diminished to 110,000 bushels. The prices paid the Nashville and Cincinnati markets vary from 60 cents to $2.25 per bushel, according to production and demand. The average yield is about forty bushels per acre. The best soils for peanuts are those which are well drained, and have a large quan- tity of intermingling gravel. One of the most important crops of Tennessee, and one to which it is peculiarly adapted, is that of hay. Although its production is small inoe POE la sac ice AER ee a a a a . a Sears ek Sate See A a te CS — 242. HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. comparison with its value to the farmer, it has steadily increased for the past fifty years, as is evidenced by the following figures taken from the census reports: In 1839 there were produced 31,233 tons; 1n 1529, (4 - 091 tons; in 1859, 143,499 tons; in 1869, 116,582 tons, and in 1879, 186,698 tons. The average yield per acre is not far from one and one-fourth tons. No State is more abundantly supplied with water-courses, and the hay crop of Tennessee might be made to rival that of any other State in the Union. But the hay growing regions are not confined to the low land bordering the streams; on the northern slopes of the ridges of East Ten- nessee and on the rolling lands of the Central Basin, timothy grows with a surprising luxuriance, and upon the flat lands of the Highland River and in the sandy lands of West Tennessee, herd grass finds a fitting soil and grows to a height almost incredible. Knox, Greene, Sullivan, Wash- ington and Davidson are among the best hay growing counties in the State, Greene ranking first and Davidson second. While the average yield of hay for the State is small, instances are given where meadows favorably located have yielded, for a period of ten years in succession, from two to three tons per acre. Of the many varieties of grasses there is scarcely one but that in some portion of the State can be grown with profit. Timothy is the best grass for hay making, and it improves all pastures when it is mixed with other grasses. It does best in: limestone land, in which the crop often amounts to two tons of hay per acre, which rarely sells for less than $20 per ton. Blue-grass is a perennial, and is essentially a pasture grass. It grows but on limestone lands, and to it Kentucky and several other States owe a large portion of their wealth. Much of the lands of EKast- ern and Middle Tennessee produce as fine blue-grass as can be grown anywhere, and it will ultimately cover all the limestone hills of the State. Several of the counties of West Tennessee will also produce good blue-grass. Indeed but little land exists in the State which, under proper management, will not grow this grass profitably, and there is no reason why Tennessee should not rival Kentucky in its production. Herd’s-grass, or red top, is a hardy perennial, and is devoted to both pasture and meadow. For making meadow in swampy land it is regarded as superior to any other grass. It produces a deep, tough sod Ohireore that make a firm surface, even in muddy places, and yields a ton and a half of hay of good quality per acre. In well drained upland it yields fair crops of hay, but is not equal to clover and timothy. This grass finds a most congenial soil throughout West Tennessee, in many places attaining the height of five feet. It is probably better adapted to all the soils of the State than any other grass. It flourishes upon the slopesHISTORY OF TENNESSEER. 243 and in the valleys of East Tennessee, and yields abundantly upon the sandstone soils of the Cumberland Table-land, as well as on the rolling surface of the Highland River. In the Central Basin, too, it is second only to red clover and timothy as a meadow grass. Orchard-grass, also a perennial, makes hay and pasture of the best quality. It grows best on limestone lands, but makes good meadows on any rich soil. It is difficult, however, to get this grass well sodded and to keep it in full possession of the ground. Some of the good points of this grass are its adaptability to every variety of soil, its rapid growth, its ability to resist drought and its power to grow in the shade. Red clover is the most valuable of all the grasses. It not only makes excellent hay and pasturage, but is, also, the great fertilizer of land. It STOWS best on rich limestone lands, but may be made to prosper on any land which is not extremely sandy. It finds a congenial soil in the clayey lands of the valleys of East Tennessee, on the red soils of the Highland Rim and on the limestone loams of the Central Basin. Probably three- fourths of the land in the State will grow clover remuneratively. Besides the common red clover several other species are gcrowrmwith suc- cess, the two most important of which are alsike clover and crimson clover. The former is a perennial and is hardier than red clover, but its yield is less. The latter is an annual, and is chiefly valuable as a green food. Of the annual grasses cultivated in Tennessee the most important is millet, of which there are many varieties. The first millet cultivated in the State was of the kind commonly termed Tennessee Millet. In a few years the Hungarian grass became popular, and later the Missouri millet became the favorite. At the close of the war the German variety was introduced, and soon superseded all others. These grasses all grow best in limestone soils, but prosper on any soil that is rich enough, and there is probably more hay made from them in Tennessee than from any other kind of grass. There are many other valuable grasses which could be profitably grown in the State, but which have not been very generally introduced. Several wild or indigenous grasses grow spontaneously, one of which is the barren, or prairie grass. It covered all the prairie lands when the country was first settled by white people. It springs up about the Ist of April, grows to the height of two feet, and affords good pas- turage from April to the 1st of August, when it becomes hard and woody so that stock refuse to eat it. Wherever the forest is not so dense as to exclude the light and heat of the sun, on the streams and table- lands of the Cumberland Mountains and on the sandy, flinty and siliceous ‘“Alat woods” of the whole State, this grass still holds possession, and is a blessing to the inhabitants of all lands which are deficient in lime. oo crannies Ee —— Sk ng ‘ fae |i} | Pail + eae || ae : if { | ii fee i} 5 Re Boe ah | He Bie | 1 feet ; Herre ae | ee if i} He i | i | ; Hh | fal : ye bil ih Win bie 1 ey eae hh) : ie ie | os t Wath et ‘4 ee || ri 1 i i P| ae EER | f i 1 j 1) a :SS oe a 4 ee ee Zoe = SPOT LY sateen, ee reas re — = seinablinsnmmein Ps a anne ane ap ange seal as pam nama Sten pes - Sp Sie - = a i oe spits r a ; os ° This industry became well nigh annihilated during the civilHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 249 producing as many hogs as in 1860. Swine are probably more suscepti- ble of rapid improvement, by judicious care and breeding, than almost any other class of domestic animals. Hence in renewing their herds, many of the more enterprising farmers, recognizing the importance of introducing improved breeds, made large importations of Berkshires, Poland China, Essex, Jersey Reds, and other standard varieties. These importations have since continued, and such is the perfection to which the hogs of the State are bred, it is questionable if finer specimens are to be found in any other portion of the United States, or in Europe. More or less poultry is raised or allowed to breed on all farms in Tennessee, but as a general rule the fowls receive but little attention. In East Tennessee, however, the raising of poultry for market is growing into an industry of considerable importance. ‘The value of this interest is usually under-estimated. In 1880 there were over 16,000,000 dozen eggs produced, and the number of fowls in the State exceeded 5,000,000. The natural aptitude of the soils of Tennessee for the production of valuable grasses has already been noticed. That it has natural ad- vantages for the economical production of butter and cheese would almost follow as a necessary consequence. Yet so httle have the dairy interests been developed that in 1879 Tennessee, compared with the other States of the Union, stood fourteenth in the amount of butter made upon farms, and twenty-third in the production of cheese, while in the amount of milk sold to butter and cheese factories she stood the twenty-fifth, the amount being only 1,006,795 gallons. With natural advantages equal to those of the great dairy States, New York, Pennsylvania and Ohio, Tennessee has not until very recently produced butter and cheese in sufficient quantities to supply the home demand. Within the past few years, however, the establishment of creameries has given the industry a decided impetus, and in many counties, it bids fair to become the most profitable branch of husbandry. The Tennessee Creamery Company, with headquarters 1n Nashville, and operating in Middle Tennessee, has done much toward the development of the dairy business in that section. The prices paid for milk by these creameries are fully one-third more than are paid in New York and Pennsylvania, yet they are able to com- pete successfully in the markets with the butter makers of any other State. The following was written by a well known authority upon the subject: “Tennessee has many eminent advantages as a dairy State. he ° @ c ? , It can make butter as cheap or cheaper than any other State, because . - ; ~ 7 cod grazing lands are cheaper; because it is the most southern State Oe ; ; ° that grows a variety of grasses and forage plants; because the climate is mild, and cows have access for a longer period to those succulent grasses:er ee 2 . 2S ee a: SPORT ag oT EME et ST age TEE SETTER ~ pl ca = . oe “peer ee eee or = Se ern * Premrmcens ee ekg lee alla 250 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. which are so promotive of the heavy flood of milk, and consequently a winter dairies can be carried on for a greater length of time. That the dairy interests of Tennessee are rapidly advancing is evident from the fact that the butter production for 1879 was double that of 1869, and it is safe to say that the increase during the present deeade will be corre- spondingly great. From the first settling of the State it has been the custom of a large majority of the farmers to secure a few colonies of bees as a necessary adjunct to a well stocked farm, but it was not until the introduction of improved hives, artificial swarming, movable combs and extractors that it was pursued as a separate vocation. At present there are many per- sons who engage in this business almost exclusively, and whose profits In the vear 1850 the number of pounds of bees-wax and e are satisfactory. honey reported for Tennessee was 1,036,572; bees-wax was 98,882 pounds, and of honey, 1,519,390 pounds; in 1870, 51,685 pounds of bees-wax, and 1,039,550 pounds of honey. The decrease for 1870 is doubtless due to the effect of the war. in 1860. the amount of In 1880 the amount of honey reported was 2,130,689 pounds, and of wax 86,421 pounds, which places Tennessee first among the States of the Union in aplarian products. These results are due not only to the increased number of bees kept, but to the improved methods of handling them and to the sntroduction of Italian bees, which were first brought into the State in the year 1866. Tennessee has the best climate and the greatest variety of food for bees of any State, having all the forage plants of both the North and the South, while it has some that are not found in either. The climate, too, is especially adapted to bee culture, being a medium one with mild and short winters and agreeable summers. Perhaps no industry in Tennessee has made greater advancement in the past twenty years than that of grape crowing, the admirable adapta- tion of the soil and climate to which was in a great measure unknown or One of the first efforts to grow grapes in the State was made by P. F. Tavel, a Swiss, who came to Stewart County in 1844. to do well, and the attempt was abandoned under the impression that the neglected until since the close of the war. The varieties he planted being imported failed oO climate was not propitious for the culture of the fruit. Some ten years later a few enterprising persons in various parts of the State, after in- specting the vineyards around Cincinnati, were induced to plant a few vines of the Isabella and Catawba varieties. Among these early pioneers in grape growing were James Clark and Rebecca Dudley, of Montgom- ery County, who, long before wine making in Tennessee was thought possible, planted and successfully managed several acres of vines, andHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. O51 made wine that by reason of its excellence and flavor soon became famous throughout the country. The varieties they planted, however, were not suited to the latitude, and the frequent failures of their vineyards in- duced the belief that T’'ennessee could never be made a grape growing State. For a time they even were discouraged, but eventually came to the conclusion that the failures arose rather from the unsuitableness of the varieties than from the nature of the location, soil or climate. Act- ing upon this belief some new kinds, among which were the Ives Seedling and Concord, were planted and were found to thrive so well that the old vineyards were abandoned. Since that time grapes have been very suc- cessfully and profitably grown in nearly every section of the State. Several different varieties are planted, but for wine the two above named predominate. From the days of the earliest settlers, even among the Indians, excel- lent apples have been grown in Tennessee, and there is scarcely a county in the State that, with proper cultivation, will not produce them abun- dantly. ‘The most favorable localities for apples, as well as other of the larger fruits, are the river lands of Middle Tennessee, the great plateau of West Tennessee and the hillsides of the eastern division. These localities are equal to the most favored regions of New York and Pennsylvania. Until within the past few years the raising of apples has been mainly confined to the supply for domestic purposes. Most of the old orchards are stocked with native varieties, but new and improved late varieties are now being introduced, and the acreage of orchards is rapidly increasing. Several extensive orchards have recently been planted on the river lands in Rob- ertson County, and also by the Ruby community, in Morgan County. Of the cultivated berries the strawberry is the most largely raised, and it grows with vigor and productiveness in every portion of the State. The planting and crops of these berries in the vicinity of Chattanooga is said to have doubled annually for the past five years. The shipments of them for the season of 1882 aggregated 143,822 pounds; for the sea- son of 1884, 457,846 pounds, and for the season of 1885, 814,574 pounds. Nearly all portions otf West Tennessee, but more especially the northern counties, are unsurpassed for the production of this fruit, and large and annually increasing quantities are shipped to the cities of the North. With the advantages of soil, climate and transportation facilities the possibili- ties of this business are unlimited. The cultivation of raspberries, blackberries and dew-berries has not been extensively engaged in on account of the luxuriance and perfection with which they grow in the wild state. Berries of the finest flavor and of large size grow wild along the fence-rows, in “old fields” and in thePA A TS ee a Sena _— alee _— 2 SINT a Se Sent eee Fe eR SS ES | oe ea I} a i} it im quae nee a ans eT eer etme conn assinitelie ee S ogee yaeenae es =o Re aa TI Lalcebnaliens is a ane a ete ee Beers em earn seta ne ping Gan ae i i ATF ; : j a4 ! ty my | i i i : { tea } Seba Ry ety t} | ibaa hes a ititaal pat Hi “18 pHeti| ety ini at Se al Hi} 1h iy | 4 Wei 4 \, iy te he | | (fe a] ; to : pees! (By) the i] Pepe teh) } ida Vi ts iy & His tae i ; tF B é Ea inom eee iil iy te ait | ca a} eb] i Bi eLinn | i 1 thy i 7 4 | ERS a ap ap ade aoe it Dae eras me Ta 252 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. forest. For the production of all kinds of small fruits Tennessee stands superior to any other State in the Union. From the following lists of exports* some idea of the extent of the fruit growl! ained: Apples, 8,000 barrels; pears, 3,000 barrels; peaches, may be obt 2.500 crates; plums, 590 crates: strawberries, 22,000 crates ; other fruits, 10,000 crates. The shipments from Chattanooga for the same season were, in pounds: Peaches, plums, and pears, 86.115: blackberries, 208,208 ; rasp- berries, 2,465; strawberries, 457,816; and grapes, 16, aches for the season of 1889 amounted to 446,266 pounds. from Madison County for 1884 1g industry in West T'ennessee 733. The shipment of pe CENSUS REPORTS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION WITH THE RELATIVE RANK OF TENNESSEE. 1840. 1850. 1860 1870. 1880. PRODUCTS. ae < ; Fae Amount! Rank| Amount Rank) Amount Rank! Amount Rank! Amount Rank ~ |(Bushels) WhO bicscssscscrssesscescsce: | 4,569,692) 6 1,619,386) 13 5,459,268| 13 6,188,916) 13 7,331,353) 15 GOvT ee corctcnccconnsises cocees 44,986,188 ] 52,276,223 5 52,089,926 6 41 ,3438,61 } "a 62,764,429 9 Care eo ccsceeeesiee | 12080;678 6 7,703,086 8 | 2,267,814) 17 4 513,315) 138 4.722.190) 16 RYC.-cscscosrsseenssseessnseres 304,320| 12 89,137) 15 | 257,989) 16 223,335) 17 156,419 21 ZATICY. .--cccnceeever scence eee 4.809] 21 2,737| 24 | 25,144) 21 75,068) 22 30,019) 29 Buck wheat.....sseseesceees 72018} Lo 19,427) 18 | 14,481) 24 77,437| 16 33.434| 21 Irish Potatoes.......- | 4 994.370 1,067,844, 16 | 1,182,005) 21 1,124,337) 22 1,354,481) 25 Sweet Potatoes... f | 2 2 _|eeeeeeees 2.777,716| 6 | 2,604,672 6 1,205,683 8 2,369,901 3 |( Pounds) (Bales) Bolton cee eeeOlszi ot 194,532) 95 296,464 8 181,842 8 330,621 9 GRACO teen |291bp0.482) 8) |, 20,148,952) 13,448,097) 3 21,465,452) = 3 29,365,052) 5 (Tons) FLAY eo cccecescsaccccress| S123) -0-2--s- 74,091) 21 143,499| 22 116,582} 24 186,698 -26 (Pounds) : BE a rare eeeeeceleneaneee 8,139,585) 11 10,017,787} 15 9.571,069} 13 17,886,369, 14 CHECSC.ccececccocccccoresecece|encccccevesere|sesteese 177,681; 19 135,575) 22 142,240; 138 98,740 22 HODECY.....--cresssesrecsoscce | sccccaccsccees|vcccecses 1,036,572 4, 1,519 ,300 5 1,039,550 5 2,130,689 ] Maple Sugar... s.ecccsees Pee eitivascac|sencseers 158,557| 14 115.620) 17 134,968] 18 31,296) 20 \ (Gallons) Maple Molasses........+. [Cer eolLocusseral cestacecrserses hocerkeee 74,372 9 4843) 18 3,688} 18 Sorghum Molasses.......|..0+eeessrsee|srerrers|seceeetaceeeres [eee cee 706,663 6 1,254,701 6 3,776,212 2 Value of Orchard ee PLOGUCES.000.-ccescecessee| oecceeseeenes |oceceeess $52 894) 19 $305,003) 18 $571,520) 21 $919,844 16 Number | ELOTSES.. .ccccccsccoscccccccece 341,409 5 270,636} 7 290,882 9 247,254) 11 266,119) 14 Mules and ASSE€S...i.sc0+|eceesesseeees leveeeenes 75:803) I 126,335) 1 102,903; 2 173,498) 2 OXON «++ ssescereeesenstereseers \Scscuccriscasec|sesaccees 86,255) 4 102,158} 7 63,970) 5 27,312) 14 MUCH COWS... cccccccsescens|cccvecescerece|cooncsoes| 250,456 7 249,514| 10 243.197| 12 303,900; 13 Other WALTON srcccrcoscesec| cascpesccces sen |sesaneeee 414,051) 14 413,060) 15 336,529) 11 452,462) 15 Sheep Neceneenncaevpesccdassces | 741,593) 7 811,€91| 9 Nio.oli{ 1 826,783) 12 672,789} 16 SWAIDEC .2-00: veccceccsrerecscees | 2,926,607 1 3,104,800 1 2,347,321 4 1,828,690 5 2,160,495 7 Value of all Li 7 eS yeaa ae alue of a sive StoCkececcecccscecccnsss- sal boseneccencood aneccene $29,978,016 5 $60,211,425 6 $55,084,075 9 |$ 43,651,476) 13 Acres of Improved! ee Land banenee ceeenesrarseees |sevecrerensace|soesoenes | 5,175,173 8 | 6,795,337 9 6,843,278 9 8,496,556, 14 Wale OL ALIS eres lsteccetereccsslvcccsseer|@O2,O0L;4Lan 19 $271,358,985 8 |$218.743,747' 12 |$206,749,837' 14 * Estimated. +Wax and honey combined.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. CHEAPER 10Xe GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT CONCLUDED—THE TIMBER INTERESTS—KIND AND QUANTITY OF NATIVE W 0oD—MANUFACTORIES—IRON PRODUCTS AND SHIP- MENTS—THE EARLY FURNACES—THE PRESENT ENORMOUS RETURNS—MIn- ERAL COMPANIES—IRON MANUFACTURES—THE COAL CONSUMPTION AND Ex- PORTS—THE MARBLE QUARRIES—QUALITY, QUANTITY AND MARKET—THE YIELD OF COPPER ORE—THE PRODUCTION OF FLOUR, COTTON AND WooLEN GOoDs, GUNPOWDER, PAPER, LEATHER, WHISKY, COTTON-SEED On Ere: — THE BUREAU OF AGRICULTURE, STATISTICS AND MINES—WHAT IT HAS ACCOMPLISHED. EW States of the Union have a larger proportionate area of valuable timber lands than Tennessee. With a superficial area of 26,000.- O00 acres, she has in farms a little over 20.000.000 acres, 54 per cent of which consists of woodland. The States having an equal or greater percentage of timber land are Florida, having 66 per cent; Ar- kansas, 65; North Carolina, 62; West Virginia, 61; Georgia, 59; Missis- sippi, 58; Alabama, 55; Louisiana. od, and South Carolina, 54. If the value of the timber is considered Tennessee without a doubt exceeds them all. In her forests may be found almost every variety of tree known to the United States. This is due to the difference of elevation in the State, which produces a great diversity of climate, and to the ex- istence of a variety of soil. Some portions of West Tennessee are cov- ered with heavy forests, the magnificience of which are unsurpassed in America. The river Swamps in this part of the State still contain large bodies of cypress, while the hills are covered with oaks. hickories and other hard-wood trees. The central portion of the State, now more largely cleared than either of the other divisions, was once covered with forests of hard wood, considerable bodies of which still remain upon the land least fit for agricultural purposes, or remote from railroads. Nearly through the center of this middle district. extending north and south. the “cedar glades” occupy an extensive region. The eastern portion of the State is covered with a heavy forest of oak and other hard woods. mixed at high elevation with hemlock, pine and spruce, and constituting one of the finest bodies of timber in the United States. As a catalog and description of all the various varieties of timber in the State would require a volume, only a few of the most important will be noticed. Of the oak Tennessee has twelve or more species, the most valuable of which is the white oak. This tree attains an enormous 16ie in “ —— ae PNW ea Lo ene SEE RE Lt et — ae ee h ey AN te Peace Se ‘3 rs ms ee a ee fee stall * = Aes oe ec y = al am fone Ee eerie — r = Se eee “t ae A es On LF, — ee (b: a i i Ce f t | si} wa PIs a nee a ear a i TIRE EE Teh 1Paihe | a. ies ee Pan8 ia 1a itt t 4 : 14 } ia = P eS og are pe Stern megs a eae ae aS ¢ - : Soy Rok tet PO 5 ie ae ee. —= 4 Menahem oe : : : aoe ji es ae Gectenatl erway as pe ee ee ema e a = ee ceemers 3 9 reer si eat rege x pes ada ee ' — = ee ee even r ee rrrertihnt .. ~ ee , : S - ~ i wa A = ee * cae eae - ST pore = oe SS ors - — = Ss Seay eS ee i Nae eee HISTORY OF T ENNESSEE. alley of the Tennessee, and in the first and second tier of : Tt is found in eonsiderable quantities the best being on the ridges in the size in the Vv river counties ol West Tennessee. in many parts of Kast Tennessee, | ! 2 : western part of that division, or in the counties resting against the Cum- berland Table-land, and also in the slopes of the Unaka Mountains. The. ridges and valleys lying on Duck and Buffalo Rivers are also covered with this tree, and it is pretty generally scattered through all the wooded district of the Highland Rim. The timber from this tree 1s used in the manufacture of wagons and agricultural implements and for staves and White oak lumber sells at the mills for $18 to $20 per 1,000 fence rails. 1d accessibility. feet, according to demand al The red oak grows in nearly every porti eater part of the staves for tobacco of the charcoal consumed by the furnaces is also manufactured from this timber. The post oak is found in all parts of the State, and grows where the soil is dry, oravelly and thin. It is used ing solid, tough, close-grained and hard poor, barren and rocky soil, on of the State, and furnishes the gr hogsheads and flour barrels. A large proportion extensively for railroad ties, be to split. The chestnut oak thrives on high, found in every division of the State, but especially f the Highland Rim. tis chiefly valuable for than that of any other tree. The iantities in the Highland Rin, es- and upon such may be upon the leached soils o its bark, which is richer in tanning black oak is found in considerable qt have a rich loamy soil; as in Montgomery, Counties. Much of this timber 1s many thousands of the latter being k is found in abundance pecially those portions which and parts of Stewart and Robertson annually made into boards and staves, shipped to the St. Louis market. The searlet oa ‘+n East Tennessee, growing 1m moist places. It 1s also found in the small swampy spots ‘1 Middle and West Tennessee, though not in sufh- articular interest or profit. Black jack eient quantities to make it of ]{ he “barrens,” but as a timber tree oak covers a considerable portion of t it is of little value. Other species of oaks are found in the State, but not in sufficient quantities to make them of much worth. The black walnut is pretty generally distributed over all the rich soils of the State. Its growth is an unerring ‘indication of fertility. It abounds in the Central Basin, and grows on the better part of the High- lands. It also flourishes on the north sides of ridges and in the valleys of East Tennessee, and attains a marvellous size upon the caleareo-sil- ceous soil of the western division. Probably no State east of the Missis- sippi has a greater quantity of this valuable timber. ‘The uses to which it is put are familiar to all. The butternut or white walnut grows upon the margins of streams and is sometimes found on rich northern slopes.HISTORY OF TENNESSER. It is seattered over almost as great an extent of territory as the black walnut. The wood from this tree is durable but not strong, and is some- times used in ornamental work for Qiv ing variety and contrast. Of the hickory there are six species found in Tennessee, the most important of which are the scaly-bark and the common hickory. The latter grows well upon all soils of middling quality in the State, and is found in abundance in what are called the “hickory barrens,” on the Highland Rim. It rar ely attains a greater diameter than eighteen inches. When of this size it is worked up into axles for wagons, spokes and felloes for carriages, and into ax handles: when small it is used for barrel and hogshead hoops and for box casings. The scaly-bark hickory seeks a fertile soil upon river banks and rich hill sides. It grows to a much larger size and splits more readily than the species described. It is employed for the same purposes. Of the two species of ash met with in the State the white ash is the most common. It was for merly very plentiful in ever y part of the State, but is now growing scarce, except in places remote from facilities for transportation. It finds its most congenial soil in the caves and north sides of mountains, and in the rich lands of the Central Basin and West Tennessee. The largest trees to be met with are in Bedford County, some of which have attained a diameter of six feet. The wood is highly esteemed by w heelwrights, earriage-makers, ship-builders and manufact- urers of agricultural implements, and is especially valuable for flooring. The green or blue ash is found only along water-courses. The beech is ‘a common growth throughout the State upon the moist soils lying upon the streams. The most extended groves are found in Macon! Trousdale, Smith, Sumner, Cannon, Bedford and other counties of the Basin. But little of it is converted into lumber, and it is chiefly valuable for fuel. When seasoned the wood is extr emely hard and solid. It is used for plow-stocks, shoe-lasts and the handles of tools. Chestnut is a valuable timber on account of its durability, and is abundant in the State. Large forests are found on the ridges of East Tennessee, on the sandstone soils of the Cumberland Table-land. and in portions of the Highland Rim, especially in the counties of Lawrence, Wayne, Hickman and Perry. Upon the first settlement of the State cedar forests were as abundant in the Central Basin as those of oak and poplar. The demands of the agriculturist, combined with the export trade, however, have nearly ex- hausted the supply in Davidson, Williamson, Sumner and Rutherford Counties. The best forests are now found in Marshall, Wilson, Bedford and Maury, covering in the aggregate nearly 300 square miles. Occa- tae ol 2 - E en ee 3 a xan = ~ —_) 4 256 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. a valuable size are still seen upon the banks of a majority ssee. Nowhere else in the United States ees of this timber. In the counties of sional trees of of the streams in Middle Tenne are there found such splendid tr Marshall and Bedford solid cedar logs have been cut that would square twenty-four inches for a distance of thirty feet. s its most congenial home and attains its highest de- s lying on the Mississippi and Tennessee Rivers, gh gated Benen then cite ee =] i we eige oh— a ete orc, = Paes bee ie The cypress find velopment in the swamp where it is found in considerable quantities. Owing to its peculiar character it rarely grows in company with other trees, but stands in iso- lated forests, rearing its long white trunk high into the upper air, while meate the deep black soil, which is often covered with water = eee its roots per of an inky blackness. A great quantity of cypress timber is made into shingles and staves for sugar hogsheads and molasses barrels. Set in the ground it resists decay for a great while, which makes it a valuable timber for fencing. The pine is one of the most abundant, and at the same time one of the most valuable of the forest growths of the State. There are two species, the white and the yellow. The latter grows in considerable quan- tities in the vicinity of Knoxville, and in many of the parallel ridges in the valley of East Tennessee. It is also found in extensive forests in the Cumberland Table-land, and forms considerable belts in Hardin and Lawrence Counties. Patches are found on the south hill-sides of Wayne, ane in less quantities 1n several counties of the Highland Rim and West Tennessee. It abounds on poor soils, those usually of sandstone, but often on red clay with gravel. It takes possession of abandoned old fields, and grows with rapidity when the soil is too sterile to produce other vegeta- tion. In the regions where ‘+t abounds it forms the principal aber for domestic purposes. The white pine is not so abundant as the preceding ; ‘+ is distributed in greater or less quantities over the slopes of the Unaka Mountains, and is found locally on the Cumberland Table-land. It grows . - > b to a larger size than the yellow pine, and makes a quality of lumber highly prized on account of its lightness and comparative freedom from resinous exudations. There are several varieties of poplar, known locally as blue, white and yellow poplar, the last named being the most valuable as a timber tree. This grows upon rich soils almost everywhere. The finest specimens ‘n the State are to be found in Obion and Dyer Counties, West Renmresee, and in Maury and Macon, in Middle Tennessee. Trees twenty and rent five feetin circumference, and from sixty to seventy feet to the first limb, are often met with. The wealth of poplar timber is very great in almost every ae art ; lactic) tan : I of the State, and millions of feet are annually shipped by river and a Seka ee ¥ eee 7 a “ - iat a re y ~ a oe — "i - ees . = - ns nn wear cameetn PL SeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Dv rail. It is more used in the construction of houses than any other wood: the studding and clap-boards, sills and joints, rafters and shingles, in a large proportion of frame buildings being made from this timber. The sycamore, plane or cotton-wood is found growing on the margins of streams in nearly every section of the State. It grows with rapidity, and is troublesome on account of the sprouts that it sends up from the stump. The wood is used in cabinet shops, and makes a beautiful article of furniture. Only as a firewood is it regarded with any favor by the farmer, as it does not split, and speedily decays when exposed to the weather. Two very ditferent species of trees are commonly called gum; both are quite abundant in Tennessee. The black gum is usually found upon rich, moist soils, and grows to a considerable size where the soil is favor- able to its growth. Itis a valuable timber for hubs, and is much used tor that purpose on account of the difficulty with which it splits. The sweet gum is found in wet marshy places in every part of the State. Large quantities of it are manufactured into plank, which is used for coarse work; it is cheaper than poplar but decays much more rapidly. The linden or bass-wood, is abundant in the blue grass region of the Central Basin, and in some localities in East Tennessee. As a timber tree it is chiefly valuable for making firkin staves. Black or yellow locust, flourishes upon the slopes of the Highland and Cumberland Mountains, and also upon the sides of the Unakas. It is also found upon the north sides of Clinch and Powell Mountains, and grows upon the glady places of the Central Basin, where no other tree will survive. This tree rarely attains a greater size than one foot in diameter and a height of thirty or forty feet; but it grows with rapidity and in ten years makes good posts or railroad ties. There are three species of maple found in Tennessee, the sugar- maple, the red flowering maple and the white maple. The first abounds in the coves of the mountains and on the rich bottoms of the streams. It formerly covered a large portion of the Central Basin, and was the chief reliance of the early settlers for sugar. The wood of this tree has a remarkable beauty. One variety of it, the bird’s-eye maple, has an exquisite appearance, the fibres being contorted into little knots resem- bling the eye of a bird. This timber is still quite abundant in nearly every part of the State, and is yearly becoming more valuable. The red flowering maple grows in wet soils and on the marshy margin of streams, and in such localities is quite plentiful in every division of the State. The wood is hard and close grained. It is valuable for cabinet work, the most beautiful varieties selling higher than mahogany.= = Seer Se iacaltircn cee cance bo 58 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Of the elm there are also three species, the white elm, the slippery elm and the wahoo witch, or cork elm. The first 1s widely distributed in considerable quantities throughout the State, : : 3 the elms, attaining in favorable localities as much as 100 feet in height and 5 feet in diameter. The other two varieties are, perhaps, as widely distributed, but are not so abundant as the white elm. None of the and is by far the largest of species are of much value for either timber or fuel. Gotton-wood is confined almost exclusively to the alluvial bottoms of the Mississippi 1n ‘vest Tennessee. It grows very large, towering high in the air, darkening the landscape with its thick foliage. The w od is white, soft and easily cut. Its chief value is for fuel, being used in great quantities by the steam-boats that ply on the Mississippi. Of the firs there are two species found in the State, the balsam fir and the black fir or spruce. Some of the highest mountain peaks are eovered with the former variety, which is seldom met with at a lower elevation than 4,000 feet. The dark foliage of the tree has given the name to the Black Mountains of North Carolina, and makes the charac- teristic feature of many of the highest peaks of the Unakas. Being in- accessible it is rarely made into lumber, though the trunks often reach 100 feet in diameter. The black fir is found in the same localities. As a shrub sassafras is found in every portion of the State, but most abundantly in the valley of East Tennessee and upon the Highland Rim. It is a great pest to the farmer, sometimes covering a field with sprouts almost as thickly and continuously as if sown. These shrubs upon their coil never reach the dimensions of a tree, and rarely attain a size sufficient for fence-stakes. In West Tennessee, however, the sassafras is one of the largest trees of the forest. A specimen of this species was found in Obion County which measured sixty inches in diameter, exclusive of the bark. The wood is soft, brittle and close grained, and is used for house studding and to some extent for the manufacture of furniture. The trees mentioned constitute the great bulk of the timber in Ten- nessee, but there are many other varieties which have a special interest. Among them are the buckeye, mulberry, wild cherry, dogwood, tupelo, pecan, catalpa, cucumber, laurel, holly, hornbeam, box elder, chinqua- pin, crab apple, hackberry, willow, birch and persimmon. The development of the manufacturing and other industrial enter- prises in Tennessee since the close of the civil war has been almost unprecedented, and especially is this true of the lumber business. No trade during the past twenty years has exhibited a more uniform and substantial growth than that embraced in the manufacture and distribu- tion of lumber, and no industry with the exception of iron, gives employ-HISTORY OF TENNESSEBR. ment to a greater number of persons and requires a larger investment of capital. The principal center of this industry in the State is Nashville. which now ranks fifth in the importance as a lumber market, and third in size as a manufacturing center. The annual value of her lumber pro- duction amounts to about $5,000,000. The annual shipments of rough and manutactured lumber reach nearly 120,000,000 feet. It is Sone nearly every city in the United States, and large quantities are exported to London, Liverpool, Hamburg, and other Kuropean points. Although during later years considerable amounts have been received by ail the chief supply of logs and lumber is received by the @urmnieriand River, one of the greatest logging streams for its length in the world. The chief lumber staple of Nashville is the yellow poplar, although that city stands at the head of all Southern cities as a hard-wood market, and has the largest trade in black walnut lumber of any market in the United States. It is also the distributing point for the famous Tennessee red cedar. The beginning of this industry in Nashville may be said to date from 1840, when the first steam saw-mill was erected. From that time until the war the lumber operations were confined almost exclusively to the local trade. ‘T’he only shipments of any consequence were red eedlen rafted to Memphis, Helena and New Orleans, and consisting mostly of railroad ties. Within the past ten years the business has developed wonderfully, and the volume of capital invested is annually increasing. In 1870 there were but three saw-mills and six planing-mills.. There are now within the limits of the city thirteen saw-mills, twelve planing- mills and thirty-five firms engaged in the lumber trade. The second city in importance as a lumber center is probably Chat- tanooga. The mills in that city now cut annually from 14,000,000 to 20,000,000 feet of lumber, while those in the country tributary to it cut not less than 100,000,000 feet more. Of this latter product about 30,000,000 feet is handled by Chattanooga dealers, and used by her wood-working establishments. Large amounts of pine, both yellow and white, as well as nearly all the varieties of hard wood are manufactured into lumber and shipped to Northern cities. In addition to the plow and other agricultural implement manutfactories which consume a large amount of lumber there are in Chattanooga nine establishments engaged in manufacturing chair furniture, pumps, handles, and wooden ware, which represent in the aggregate an investment of over $350,000. These factories gives employment to more than 500 hands, and turn out annually manufactured products to the value of $500,000. Few of these establishments date their existence back of 1870, and the majority of them have been put into operation the present decade. ean oeeanettedit ammeter ee ee om ee 2 > >. 7 - - om 7 ae | et othe ie haan, soot ease rigs nie jee tae nogaare apr se a a corre an ta Bie ga > ee ~ > a i aan eee eo ren weaned paige tae aL langet are Sie eer fae aaeenwren RS Ag TA TS TET Ss Sipe es ERT: en ; ——— = j ane anor’ —- eens ep Sopra ee ag Depa meen a Ee ger aa Serle PACE TE RS RE at A ne sees SS aii 7 = = = ora ~ seem aan Cay = —S~ — - — co : ———__——_~ encll = on an — 4 = «an Se oe a fi 5 oe a Sr ; ~ —— pe ser Naha ng pera om = E s a = : 7 ~ ae ER f : Renn — _ SaccnsSnSSnsSSnnDeagSeD a - - a a - a —_— ~ - Ty = aa SSA SREnEEER Sea So Samoa Sa LoS SS Ss SSS. === = =s= 3 anaes emp TI a ae ae a cme na . maces — ? a ae EET ORNS die aod = os = 2 Se mo ~— 4 md 1 9 walnut. . This industry in Knoxville also is developing rapidly, and that city, situated as it is in one of the finest timber regions in the world, will in a few years, no doubt, rival any other point in the State, especially in the manufacture of pine and har d-wood lumber. Every county in the State manufactures lumber in greater or less quantities. According to the last census the number of saw-mills in Tennessee was 755, representing an investment of capital to the amount of $2,004,500, and making $3 744,905 worth of products annually. Could a report of this industry be obtained at the present time these figures would be largely increased. The following table exhibits the condition in 1880 of the manufactures which are altogether or very largely dependent upon timber for raw material: No. of Estab- Value of lishments. Capital. Products Agricultural implements............ ft OO $161,030 $ 182,116 BOXCSe oc. ets ce sc ean 23,500 46,000 Coffins, caskets, etc........... 27 40,485 75,900 Carriages and WAgoDS........ 6.65 -+se cree 51 715,050 1,253, 721 Cooperage. . 2 S$ ule) we ov 36, 350 158,275 Sash, doors and hinds ee sa uct ore cee cite 8 183,500 268. 230 WUOOUENNWATC. 6. 6. coe ec eee ee 99,430 247,350 MUTNILUOie oc ee oe eee eee ere 85 511,250 954,100 The making of white oak staves for the Kuropean market has grown to be quite an important industry. The number annually shipped from the lower Tennessee River, and made in Hardin, Wayne, Perry, Hum- phreys and Stewart Counties is over 1,500,000. About one-half of the quantity is shipped out of the Cumberland. In their rough state they command at New Orleans usually from $80 to $150 per thousand. The industry of first importance to Tennessee, and for.which she has resources unexcelled by any State in the Union, is the manufacture of iron and its manipulation into forms of utility. Although this indus- try, as it now exists, has grown up in the past twenty years, its history dates back into the last century. The first settlers of Tennessee erected iron works within its limits soon after the close of the Revolution. A bloomary was built in Washington County in 1790, and another at Kliza- bethton, on Doe River in Carter County, about 1795. Waguer’s bloom- ary, on Roane Creek, in Johnson County, is said to have been built in the same year. A bloomary was also erected on Camp Creek, in Greene County, in 1797. Two bloomaries in Jefferson County, the Mossy Creek Forge, ten miles north of Dandridge, and Dumpling Forge, five milesHISTORY OF TENNESSEE, °61 west of Dandridge, were built in the same year. At about the same time, if not earlier, David Ross, the proprietor of iron works in Campbell County, Va., erected a large furnace and forge at the junction of the two forks of the Holston River, in Sullivan County, near the Virginia line, on the great road from Knoxville to Philadelphia. - It is said that boats of twenty-five tons’ burden, could ascend to Ross’ iron works, and that at Long Island, a short distance above on the Holston, boats were built to transport iron and castings, made in considerable quantities at these works, with other produce, to the lower settlements and to New Orleans. A bloomary was built about 1795 below the mouth of the Watauga, and another at the same time about twenty-five miles above the mouth of French Broad River, and thirty miles above Knoxville. In what is now known as Middle Tennessee, iron was also made during the last decade of the last century. A few years after the founding of Nashville, iron ore was discovered about thirty miles west of the future city. Between 1790 and 1795 Cumberland Furnace was erected on Iron Fork of Barton’s Creek, in Dickson County, seven miles northwest of Charlotte. This furnace was rebuilt in 1825, and is still in operation. This county, with Stewart and Montgomery Counties, afterward became very prominent in the manufacture of charcoal and pig-iron. The first furnace in Montgom- ery County was probably on Yellow Creek, fourteen miles southwest of Clarksville, built in 1802. The enterprises of these early iron workers assume a picturesque aspect, when viewed in connection with the primi- tive methods of manufacture which were employed by them, and which, in some portions of Kast Tennessee, have been continued to the present day. Their charcoal furnaces were blown through one tuyere with wooden tubs, adjusted to attachments which were slow in motion, and which did notmake the best use of the water-power that was often insufficiently supplied by mountain streams of limited volume. A ton or two of iron a day in the shape of pigs or castings was a good yield. The bloomaries, with scarcely an exception, were furnished with a trompe or water-blast in a small stream with a suitable fall supplying both the blast for the fires and the power which turned the wheel that moved the hammer. Of cast iron cylinders, steam power, two tuyeres, and many other improvements in the charcoal-iron industry, these people knew but little. They were pioneers and frontiersmen in every sense; from the world of invention and progress they were shut out by mountains and streams and hun- dreds of miles of unsubdued forests. It is to their credit, and it should not be forgotten, that they diligently sought to utilize the resources which they found under their feet, and that they were not discouraged from undertaking a difficult task, because the only means for its accom- a } ee oe: =< ne te : ieee ‘ eases a Rk een iin min magints ETE ea rennet Sogrrereng ig iinet atta : pee ‘ : A itis sa ae = ee a ae eit =o ore ae a ° - 4 262 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. plishment of which they had any knowledge were crude in conception and often very difficult to obtain. The iron industry of Tennessee, however, made steady progress aiter the opening of the present century. Both furnaces and bloomaries mul- i oO i = a ae : tiplied rapidly. In 1856 there were enumerated over 75 forges and bloomaries, 71 furnaces, and 4 ro . . a ge 7 ( a > . 4 : 2 ee ( had been in operation at some period after 1790. Of the furnaces, 29 lling-mills in the State, each of which were in East Tennessee, and 42 in Middle and West Tennessee. Of the latter. 14 were in Stewart County, 12. in Montgomery, 7 in Dickson, 2 in Hickman, 2 in Perry, 2 in Decatur, 2 in Wayne, and | in Hardin Coun- ty. The furnaces a East Tennessee were mainly in Sullivan and Car- ter Counties, Sullivan having 9, and Carter 7; but Johnson, Washington, Greene, Cocke, Sevier, Monroe, Hamilton, Claiborne, Campbell, Grainger and Union Counties, each had.1 or 2. furnaces, while Roane County had 3- The forges and bloomaries were mainly located in East Tennessee. Johnson County contained 15, Carter 10, Sullivan 6, Washington 3, Greene 10, Campbell 7 Blount 4, Roane 7, Rhea 8, and a few other counties 1 and 2 each. Nearly all of these were bloomaries. In West Tennessee there were less than a dozen refinery forges, and 1 or 2 bloomaries. ‘These forges were mainly employed, from about 15825 to 1860. in the manufacture of blooms for rolling-mills, many of which were sold to mills in the Ohio Valley. Most of the furnaces, forges and bloom- aries enumerated have been abandoned. ‘There still remain in the State 20 charcoal furnaces and about the same number of forges and bloom- aries. Cumberland Rolling-mill, on the left bank of the Cumberland River, in Stewart County, was built in 1829. It was, probably, the first establishment of the kind in the State, and was the only one as late. as L856. Since the close of the civil war, Chattanooga has become the most prominent iron center in Tennessee, having several iron enterprises of its own, and others in its vicinity. In 1804, Bluff Furnace was built to use charcoal, and at the beginning of the war, in 1861, the erection of the Vulcan Rolling-mill, to roll bar iron, was commenced. This mill was not finished in 1860, when it was burned by the Union forces. It was rebuilt in 1866. In 1864 a rolling-mill, to re-roll iron rails, was erected by the United States Government, under the supervision of John Fritz, superin- tendent of the Cambria Iron Works. In 1869 it was purchased by the Roane Iron Company, who at once put in puddling furnaces and began making iron rails. This company, the year previous, had purchased a large tract of land about seventy miles north of Chattanooga, in Roane County, and had built a small furnace with a capacity of about 9,000tons per year. HISTORY OF TENNESSER. 2963 IS r . ? The business was successful, and the company soon be- gan the erection of another and larger furnace, which was put in blast in 1872. Working capacity of the two, about 20,000 tons annually, which have since been doubled. The first open-hearth steel made in any Southern State, was made by this company, by the Siemens-Martin process, at Chattanooga, June 6, 1878. r : : a ° = e The Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Company own three furnaces situated at Cowan and South Pittsburg, which have a combined capacity of about 75.000 tons. The one at the former place was built in L880. and those at South Pittsburg, in 1879 and 1881. 3 Other furnaces which are more or less tributary to Chattanooga as a center are Oakdale, in Roane County, capacity, 21,000 tons; Citico, in that city, 35,000 tons; Dayton, in Rhea County, 70,000 tons, making an aggregate capacity of over 225,000 tons. In 1880 the total production of the blast furnace of the State was reported at only 47.873 tons. show- ing an increase of little less than 500 per cent during the past six years. The grand agg regate of iron and steel manufactured in Tennessee accord- ing to the last census was 77,100 tons, valued at $2,274,253. The cap- ital invested in this industry amounted to $3,681,776, and was distribu- ted among forty-three establishments. “The six leading counties in the order of production were Hamilton, 35,645 tons; Marion, 17,958 tons; Roane, 12,000 tons; Knox, 4,181 tons; Dickson, 2,400 tons, and Stewart, L.SOO tons. The number of establishments engaged in the manufacture of ma- chinery, nails, car-wheels and other articles using iron as raw material, is annually increasing. ‘The sapltal invested in this branch of the iron industry in Chattanooga amounts to over $500,000, and the annual prod- uct of iron to over $800,000. Knoxville, also, has a considerable amount of capital invested in manufactories of this class. The Knoxville Car- Wheel Company in 1880, with a capital of $101,000, was turning out an average of thirty-five car-wheels per day. The Knoxville Iron Company was incorporated in 1864, and in 1880 had a capital stock paid in of LI350:0005 Tt nails per day. employs 250 hands, and has a capacity of 200 kegs of It has eight puddling furnaces, four trains of rollers, and thirty nail machines. Besides nails the company makes railroad spikes, boat spikes, street rails and light T rails. The Knoxville Foundry & Machine Company had an invested cap- ital in 1880 of $45,000, and employed forty hands. This company man- ufactures mill machinery, castings, steam engines, boilers, saw-mills, der- ricks and other machinery of that class. Nashville and Memphis are not very extensively engaged in iron manufacturing. In 1880 the number— ee — at tne diene ee bes Pia ay a ‘ nw Lely bod; | J } dae ls 1 $e Ri j { hh ; or OE - = oe: 264 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. of foundries aud machine shops in the former city was thirteen, with a capital of $143,300, and an annual production of $487,451. The extent of this business in Memphis does not differ materially from that in Nashville. As great and important as are the iron resources of Tennessee, they would be of little value were it not for the vast bodies of coal which he adjacent. Previous to 1850 but very little coal was mined, and that was mostly used in blacksmithing. The pioneer in the coal business of Ten- Mecseo was Henry H. Wiley, of Anderson County, a native of Virginia, and a land surveyor by profession. He opened a mine on Poplar Creek, and for many years during the winter months boated coal down to Hunts- ville and Decatur, Ala. He hauled the coal four miles to a point below the junction of the four forks of Poplar Creek, where it was put in boats, floated out that stream to the Clinch, then into the Tennessee, and thence to its destination. This mine was opened in 1852. Other mines, how- ever, had been opened several years previous, one or two as early as 1840, but these had been worked merely for local supply. One of the first opened was at what is known as the Tracy City Mine, now the most ex- tensive in the State. The seam of coal at this place was discovered by some boys hunting a rabbit: the animal ran under the root of a tree, and in digging it out the coal was found. They reported the discovery to their father. Ben Wooten, and he, thinking it might be of some value, got out a grant for 500 acres covering the opening. The Wooten Bros. afterward opened the seam, and for many years hauled the eoal down the mountain to the blacksmiths in the valley, and some was sent to Nashville. In 1852 Roorman Johnson, John Cryder, S. F. Tracy and others. of New York, came to Tennessee looking for opportunities for in- vestment. They were shown this property and soon after purchased it. A company was then formed under the name of the Sewanee Mining Company, which had a paid in ‘apital of $400,000. Im 1854 the con- struction of a railroad from the Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad to the mines was commenced, but was not completed until 1859, when the com- pany found themselves $400,000 in debt. They were sued by both the New York and Tennessee creditors. The latter, represented by A. S. Colyar, obtained the first judgment, bought in the property and re-organ- ized the company under the name of the Tennessee Coal & Railroad Com- pany, with Colyar as president. In 1862 the mines were abandoned by the company, but were taken possession of by the United States troops, and for some time were worked for the use of the army. At the close of the war a compromise was effected with the New York creditors, and, with P. A. Marbury as general manager, operations were recommenced.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 265 In 1868 the manufacture of coke in pits on the ground was begun, and during the year 5,377 bushels were shipped. In 1873 the company fore- saw that to make a great and profitable business the manufacture of coke must form a large part of their business, and that that coke must be a good iron-making fuel. A small furnace was erected on the mountain, and this experiment satisfactorily tested. During that year the ship- ment of coke amounted to 62,175 bushels. The erection of the Chatta- nooga Iron Company’s furnace gave great impetus to the enterprise, and in 1874 the coke shipment increased to 619,403 bushels. The next year the entire property was sold to Cherry, O’Connor & Co., who in 1880 be- gan the erection of a furnace at Cowan, which was finished in July, 1381. In the early part of the following year the property was sold to John H. Inman and others, Tennessee parties retaining a one-third interest. The name was changed to the Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Company. The first coal shipped from this mine since the war was in June, 1866, and shipments for remainder of the year amounted to 9,240 tons. In 1870 they amounted to 47,110 tons of coal and 415 tons of coke; in 1875, to 109,100 tons of coal and 16,160 tons of coke; in 1880, to 114,- 170 tons of coal and 64,440 tons of coke; 1883, 126,784 tons of coal and 101,090 tons of coke; 1884, 152,307 tons of coal and 100,935 tons of coke. For several years about one-half of the labor employed in these mines has been that of convicts. The company have a very large tract of land, 25,000 acres of which is underlaid with the Sewanee seam of coal, ranging from two to seven feet in thickness. The Rockwood mines, owned by the Roane Iron Company, are located in Roane County, ninety-two miles above Chattanooga. This remarkable body of coal was discovered in 1840 by William Green, an employe of John Brown. Green and William Brown soon after entered the land, and began mining the coal for local purposes. This was continued until 1867, when the property was purchased by a company, of which Gen. John T. Wilder was vice-president and manager. As has been stated, the company erected two blast furnaces, and to supply them began the manufacture of coke. This latter branch of their business has steadily increased until they now have 180 ovens. The Etna mines are situated in Marion County, fourteen miles from Chattanooga in what is known as Raccoon Mountain. They were first opened in 1852 by an Eastern company working under a lease from Rob- ert Cravens and the Boyce and Whiteside estates. Since that time they have been operated by several different companies and individuals with varied success and reverses. The present company was organized in August, 1881, under the name of the Htna Coal Company. The mines266 HISTORY OF. TENNESSEE. gs Be erin a asters Aa a ec ke patie oes now operated are owned by the company, the estate consisting of about 1 - y 1 f 7 ¢ er — 1f " "CC € 7 3.000 acres, extending from the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Rail- way to the Tennessee River. The veins worked are known as the Kelly and Oak Hill. From the Kelly Mine a eoke is made for foun- while that from Oak Hill is used for blast fur- iginally opened for general domestic use eA og ot dry use exclusively, naces. ‘The former mine was or as sold largely in Nashville, Chattanooga and else- Ss apg a and the product Ww where, but its superior qualities ture of coke soon caused the trade In 1880 about one-fourth of the entire output was coked, the remainder being sold to blacksmiths throughout the South. In 1884 any had sixty-four coke ovens, and the output from January 1 to l oal, 41,205 tons, and coke, 533,436 bushels. for blacksmith use and for the manufac- in apenas = - RET TE eee ee c= to drift almost exclusively into that Ao eee ate rene = i channel. _ arrememernrs seinen es a : Sa ee i a a ae the com] November 1 was ¢ The Soddy Coal Company's mines are located on the Cincinnati Southern Railway, twenty-one miles from Chattanooga, at Rathburn Sta- oy; eae o— a - # rg a er tion. This mine was opened in 1867 by an association of Welshmen on the co-operative plan. It proved a failure, and the mine went into the hands of a receiver. The present company took charge in 1877, and the business has since steadily increased. They have 150 coke ovens. ‘Their output from ten months preceding November 1, 1884, was 96,000 tons of coal. of which 32,000 tons. were converted into coke. They ship to Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. The Walden’s Ridge Coal Company is a corporation with the same stock holders as the Soddy Company. They operate a mine on Rocky Creek, nine miles farther up the railroad, having begun in 1883. Two seams are worked, the lower for coking exclusively, and the upper for steam and domestic purposes. In 1884 thirty-five coke ovens were in operation, producing 404.949 bushels of coke annually. ‘These mines were worked as far back as 1843. but little coal except for blacksmithing was consumed at that time. The first coal mined here for shipment was by Thomas A. Brown and John Baxter, otf Knoxville, in 1866. The coal lands at Coal Creek, in Anderson County, are owned by the Coal Creek Consolidated Mining Company. There are now six mines being worked at that place, of which two are operated by the above com- pany and the remainder leased to the Knoxville lron Company, the Coal Creek Coal Company, the New River Coal Company, and H. B. and Joel Bowling. The Coal Creek mines were first opened for shipping coal upon the completion to that place of the Knoxville & Ohio Railroad, in 1870. The shipments in 1871 amounted to 36,000 tons; in 1875, 62,- 269 tons: in 1880, 150,000 tons; and in 1882, 200,000 tons. The Knox- ville Iron Company operates a mine about one and one-half miles fromHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 267 the main track of the Knoxville & Ohio division of the East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad. They employ about 150 convicts and thirty-four laborers. During the year 1882 the company shipped 98,645 tons of coal to various markets in southwest Virginia, North and South Carolina, Georgia and Alabama, Jor the first ten months of 1884 their output amounted to 204,978 tons. The Dayton Coal & Iron Company’s mines are located in Rhea County, Tenn., and are owned by English capitalists. . These mines haye been recently opened, and are designed mainly to supply coke for the blast furnaces which have been built. The Standard Coal & Coke Company is composed -of Tennessee cap- italists who own about 1,400 acres of land, underlaid by a seam of coal four and one-half feet thick. ‘Their mine is situated near Newcomb Station, in Campbell County. ‘They employ 175 men, and produce about 350 tons of coal per day. The Poplar Creek mines are located in Morgan County. ‘These mines are all small. They are operated by the following companies: Poplar Creek, Mount Carbon, Winter’s Gap, Eureka and Oliver. The Glenn Mary Coal & Coke Company is located in Scott County, on the Cincinnati Southern Railroad. The Tabler, Crudup Coal & Coke Company was incorporated in 1881. They own 7,000 acres of land in Hamilton County, and put out about 2.00 tons of coal daily. One of the most promising fields of industrial activity in East Ten- nessee, is the development of the wonderful marble quarries in the vicin- ity of Knoxville. These marbles have obtained a reputation second to no other in the United States, and it is said that when they come into com- petition with foreign marble, they are greatly preferred and sell for a much higher price. The varieties are almost innumerable, and are of the most exquisite colors. Their solidity, durability and susceptibility of polish make them unequaled for building and monumental purposes. Although nearly fifty years have elapsed since the first marble quar- ry was opened, the business is still in its infancy, but 1s now developing rapidly. The Hawkins County marble was the first quarried, and it is said that it- was brought to notice by the favorable expression with reference to it by Dr. Troost, the first State geologist. In 1838 the Rogersville Marble Company was formed for the pur- pose of sawing marble and establishing a marble factory in the vicinity of Rogersville. Orville Rice was elected president, and 8. D. Mitchell secretary. The company operated to a limited extent for several years,pn ne - tiene nce ene ra a ee ‘ et paws : ‘ < ° ° er 2 sa = — act - ios sistidsicoeni 08 2 SENSE OF aaa Red ie he aa mae ix Saison, an : II ~ meer - - — . > o 4 * asain te = 3 Ss EES r TT a ~ \. ra at —— ae Rs ‘cs seas = or SS ae meee es ce : : ons 2 BR eng ae - . f tin ~ . @ iene ee a atc : ce. 2 , hee shiloh Pea ea ae ea epee faerie ms 2S < 3 a = Se eR ge a apemennanes: 2S aE were erected, which endeavored only to supply the local demand. In 1840 there were 454 of these establishments, of which Hast Tennessee had 225; Middle Tennessee, 164; and the western division, 65. The entire capital invested in the business was $484,114, of which Middle pet kes Rai ae meg Soh ahaa toca aaiie ii eee ae = PIT TET TS Lt — eer ae ae a Sra a ee ame Tennessee had a little more than one-half. The aggregate products were 133.547 sides of sole-leather, and 171,339 sides of uppers, of which ROS A an Montgomery County produced nearly one-sixth. In 1860 the number meer — ners of tanneries was reported at 265, with a capital of $851,780, and an annual production of leather to the value of $1,142,246. The estimated j eae 4 | bee ay Usd ia ; i kee i amount of capital invested in the making of boots and shoes was $214,- 512, and the productions were valued at $395,790. In 1870 the number of establishments engaged in the manufacture of leather was 396, repre- senting capital to the amount of $705,665, and turning out products to the value of $1,851,638. According to the census of 1880 there were 113 establishments engaged in the manufacture of curried leather, whose product amounted to $546,427, and 147 establishments manufacturing tanned leather: to the amount of $1,504,660 during the year. The larg- est tannery in the State is located at Chattanooga, and 1s operated by Fayerweather & Ladew. The products from this establishment amount to little less than $1,000,000 per annum. Nashville has several tanner- ies, all of which do a good business. The Hall & Ordway Manufactur- ing Company are erecting an extensive establishment at that place to supply their factory, as well as to meet a large foreign demand. This firm operate the only shoe manufactory in the State, and are the pioneers in that business. ‘he company was organized in November, 1885, and 7 Femina raion lien ans a tem ae on began business the first of the following January. They have a capacity of 700 pairs of shoes per day, but already contemplate increasing it to 1,000. They employ from 100 to 850 hands. Their materials, except the findings and uppers, which come principally from Boston and New we a sSta aS cen apHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Diet York, are obtained from Tennessee tanneries, and their trade is rapidly extending over the entire South. Their success in this business is a sure precursor of numerous other establishments of the kind, as Nashville al- ready has the largest boot and shoe trade of any city of its size in the United States. It is also said by experienced shoemen that Tennessee leather, on account of the superior quality of the bark and the purity of the water used in its manufacture, is superior to that of any other State. The manufacture of whisky in Tennessee dates back nearly to the advent of the first colonists. As early as 1785 Col. James Robertson, learning that the establishment of distilleries in the Cumberland settle- ments was under contemplation, secured the passage of an act by the Leg- islature of North Carolina, prohibiting the distillation of spirituous liq- uors in Dayidson County. The prohibition, however, proved of but lim- ited duration, and there was soon considerable domestic manufacture and increased consumption. For the first fifty or sixty years of the present century, there was scarcely a county in the State that was not more or less extensively engaged in the manufacture of whisky. It was usually made in small distilleries with a capacity of thirty or forty gallons per day. In 1840 the number of distilleries reported in Hast Tennessee was 606, producing for that year 314,445 gallons of whisky. The counties producing the most were McMinn, Claiborne, Hawkins, Greene, Roane and Marion. The whole number of “still-houses’’ in Middle Tennessee was 668, and the number of gallons of whisky produced, 695,769. Lin- coln, Bedford, Davidson, Maury and Robertson produced the greatest quan- tities. The first named county had 87 distillers and manufactured 128,180 gallons of whisky. This county and Robertson have long enjoyed the reputation of producing the best whisky in the State, if not in the United States. This is largely due to the fact that it is manufactured by men of long experience in the business, and the materials used are of superior quality. These two counties now produce a large part of the whisky made in the State. The largest distillery in Tennessee is that of Charles Nelson, near Greenbrier, in Robertson County. This establishment in the year 1885 produced 379,125 gallons, more than one-third the entire production for the State, and about 82 per cent of the production in Rob- ertson County. During the fiscal year, ending June 30, 1885, there were 90 registered grain distilleries in the State, of which 55 were in opera- all in operation. The total revenue for tion, and 238 fruit distilleries the year paid by the former was $802,515.74, and by the latter $73,- 849.55. The materials used by the grain distilleries were as follows: rye, 26,063 bushels; corn, 181,899 bushels; mill feed, 5,581 bushels;Pao 278 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. wheat, 49 bushels; and malt, 12,717 bushels. The following is the inter- nal revenue collected upon distilled lquors in Tennessee for each year from 1864 to 1885: 1864, $602,705.93; 1865, $1,605,263.41; 1866, 85 381,840.56; 1867, $3,349,459.91; 1868, $3,717,010.04; 1869, $1,259,- 781,12: 1870, $1,470,859.57; 1871, $874,221.65; 1872, $766,840.20; 1873, $644,480.76; 1874, $664,717.18; 1879, $861,645.28; 1876, $596,- AQT. tke. $3897. 181.13; 1878, 844 485.08; 1879, $908,924.44; 1880, $1.003,735.86; 1881. $1.146,763.64; 1882, $997,728; 1883, 81.173,890.29: 1884. $1.249,975.96; 1885, $1,057,189.43. The total tax collected for the twenty-one years amounts to $29,071,413.31. The manufacture of cotton-seed oil is an industry of great impor- tance. both in the amount of capital invested and the value of the prod- ati Memphis is the center of this business, although there are sevy- eral other towns which have extensive oil-mills. In that city there are eleven mills, but all are not run on full time. The magnitude of this branch of business is indicated by the fact that nearly $1,000,000 is annually paid out tor cotton seed by the Memphis mills alone. It also gives employment to fully 600 hands, and affords to river and railway commerce nearly $350,000 in freight. The receipts of cotton seed in Memphis during 1885 were 58,000 tons, from which there was a yield of 45,000 barrels of oil, 22,000 tons of oil cake, 26,000 bales of regius and 200 tons of ashes. The last article is used in the manufacture of fer- tilizers. A will to manufacture oil from cotton seed was established in Jackson about seven years ago, and has grown to be one of the largest establishments of the kind in the State. It gives employment to about 150 hands, and runs day and night. In 1583 a company was organized to engage in the business at Trenton, and during the summer large build- ings were erected, into which was put the most improved machinery. When first put into operation, the mill consumed 750 bushels of cotton seed, making 500 gallons of oil and 9,000 pounds of meal or coke. Within the past year the capacity of the mill has been doubled. Nashville has two mills, the first of which was built in 1868. Each consumes from 5,000 to 6,000 tons of cotton seed yearly. Their com- bined annual product is estimated at 400,000 gallons of oil and 2.100 tons of meal. The oil is used in the manufacture of soap and candles, and in the adulteration of lard and other oils. It is also said to be used to some extent in the manufacture of oleomargarine. The growth of the manufacturing interest of the State since 1850 is shown in the following table:HISTORY OF TENNESSER, 279 No. Est ae Hands | re Saws te ra . Tagvec Pai ole Vv al ue of Maton ni Year. lishments, | C@Pital Invested. Employed. | Wages Paid. satel Value of Produce Lep0.---| 2,887 | $6,527,729 | 12,039 | $2,247,492 | $5,166,886 | $9,795 608 1S60k: . 2,072 14,4: 26, 261 12,528 3,370, 687 9,416,514 17,987,225 LO(ORe 0,017 15,595, 295 19,412 9,090,630 9,657,027 34,362 636 1880....| 4,826 20,092,845 22, 445 9,254,775 23,834, 262 37,074,886 The agency which has been most effective in placing the vast natural resources and advantages of Tennessee before the world, and in inaugu- rating a better system of farming, is the Bureau of Agriculture, Statisties and Mines, established by act of the Legislature in December, 1871. With the limited appropriations granted to this bureau, not one-fifth as much as is expended for that purpose by some States of the Northwest. it has sueceeded in the past ten years in bringing into the State millions of dollars of capital and thousands of families. The commissioners of this department have been men of untiring energy and practical busi- ness ability, and to them are 1: argely due the results which have been ob- tained. J. B. Killebrew. the secretary of the bureau, and the first com- missioner ; published numerous works on the agricultural and industrial interests. His work on the “Resources of Tennessee’ is one of the most thorough and complete publications of the kind ever made. The work of the bureau under his administration proved very effective. ah ! aa tt i i , tat POL hry an ? } ba t Fe i : { i i iy ‘ee i RTE a) ces i Hee a i { 7 ed ihe | q saat ied tiRiat ' ay aa ¥. ¥ 2 lees ; i i NE eT ae ROT - a > - Ene ger emerson eens er nap ee ov pee ts - _ a ae lee lens nays Tepes Siar er ye tee Loe 284 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. “The roof of the building is constructed of rafters composed of wrought iron ties and braces, trussed in sections, and joined together by cast iron plates and knees. The greatest span of these raters IS over Representative Hall. a distance of sixty-five feet. The whole is sheathed and covered with copper. The- walls of the building for the founda- tion are 7 feet thick; those of the superstructure 4 feet and 6 inches. All of the inside walls are laid with rubble stone; the terraces, pave- ments and the round part of the tower, chiseled: the outer walls of the first story and the square part of the tower, rusticated work and tooled. The material of the building 1s of a stratified fossiliferous lime- stone of slightly bluish-gray tint with cloud-like markings. It was pro- cured within half a mile west of the building in a quarry opened by the State on the grounds ot Samuel Watkins. Stones have been quarried from this place, weighing in their rough state, fifteen or twenty tons, and thirty and more feet long. One of the terrace stones of the building is 8 feet 3 inches by 14 feet, and the cap stones of the terrace buttresses are 5 feet 10 inches by 15 feet 11 inches, the heaviest weighing probably eight or ten tons. The stone may be considered both as to durability and beauty of appearance when worked well, equal to any building stone in the country. Nearly all the materials, in addition to the stone, used in the conetnuction of the building, were produced in Tennessee, and the work was mainly done by Tennessee workmen—a magnifi:ent monument to the mechanical skill and the resources of the State.” One of the most interesting objects to be seen upon Capitol Hill is the magnificent equestrian statue of Gen. Jackson. So long ago as the session of the General Assembly* of 1845-46, the idea was conceived of erecting at the capitol in Nashville a statue in honor of Gen. Andrew Jackson, whose death took place June 8, 18 45; and an act was passed the 9d of February, 1846, appropriating the sum of $7,500, “when a suffi- cient sum shall be subscribed by the people in connection therewith to complete said monument.” Commissioners were appointed in the sixth section of said act to receive any voluntary contributions, control the dis- bursements of all funds, contract with an American sculptor or artist, and superintend the erection of said statue. For various reasons no further action was taken in the matter for many years though, it was by no means forgotten. Early in the month of January, 1879, Gen. Marcus J. Wright, of Washington City, addressed a letter to the vice-president of the Tennessee Historical Society, suggesting that Clark Mill’s eques- O° trian statue of Gen. Jackson was on sale, expressing the hope that Ten- nessee could be induced to make the purchase and tendering his services *Report of the Legislative Committee of the Jackson Statue.Sate he ree x 1 mY, a ss aint ne A i } : Yh Ae ne fs pve? Yi ate ha SCA AY) oh fata ane Cathy dey ‘i i tt ] ‘ AP ANE Se ans Wy ey mann hi} it i va ; Wi i } cut alae Hu tiie OM a Ray aA dp ie ip peasrnias Apex t . EQUESTRIAN STATUE OF GEN. JACKSON, AT NASHVILLE. Photo by Thuss, Koellein & Gilera,Se Pe an eae a ieee a eee a 7 Pema et Te ee Ee” a SE Se Na RR eee * ~ z a hte ascent i. penned eM a Lage == a BMP OSE bet ig ree ae ee 4 ul ai 2 ae alge ek laa aa aa aesHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 285 to aid in the negotiation. A correspondence ensued between Gen, Wright : ind the vice- president, and then papers, with a letter from Mills stipulating the price, were laid before the gsocie ty. ‘There was a discus. sion of plans for obtaining the requisite funds to make the purchase, but nothing definite was agreed upon and the vice-president was instructed to communicate for the society with Gen. Wright and also to con- fer with the governor of the State as to the policy of applying to the General Assembly for an appropriation. After due deliberation. the time was not deemed opportune to invoke the assistance of the State. and the society did not care to have any future prospect clouded by a denial of favorable legislation. At a meeting held July 1, 1879, the sub- ject was again brought up. Various plans for raising the money were proposed, none of which, however, commanded that assurance of success which warranted immediate action, and the measure was indefinitely post- poned. At 2 subsequent meeting of the society and of the citizen f of Nashville to make arrangements for the centennial] anniversary to be cel- ebrated in 1880, an enthusiasm was aroused which spread through the entire community. There was a pause in the pursuit of individual in- terests and the moment given to an unselfish and patriotic inspiration. Memories of the past seem to rise spontan 1eously in the public mind, and it doubtless occurred to more than one that the conjuncture of circum- stances was favorable for the ac quisition of the Jackson statue. Such a thought did certainly oceur to a venerable and patriotic citizen of Nash- ville, Maj. John L. Brown, who. early after the mee ting in December, ex- pressed his intention to try to raise, by voluntary subscriptions, the money necessary for the purchase. He wrote to Senator Harris and Maj. Blair, of W ashineton City, to make inquiry as to the cost of the statue. which was found to be $5,000. Several letters written by Col. Bullock on the subject of the purchase were published, and gave renewed impetus to the movement. Maj. Brown, continuing his efforts, secured the appointment of the president and secretary of the Historical Soc ety with himself as ‘“‘a committee for - the purchasing of the statue for the State of Tennessee.” Every means and appliance was used to further the enterprise, and by the 18th of March, 1880, the list of subscribers had so increased that success bei ing in sight the Centennial board of directors incorporated a committee of seven members, to be known as the committee for the purchase and dedication of the equestrian statue of Gen. Jackson, of which Gen. G. B. Thurston became chairman. The subscription soon aggregated an amount near or quite $5,000, which justified the consummation of the purchase.= * Swims Sigg oo { i = Te [oe i . 5 oo os - ~ Hl es 2 ree a] ea i ees a Si a { Tae sei SS = 4 Nw ; Ise, Gg ; Tee ee Tae aor : ~ cin Oona : e 286 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. On the 20th of May, 1880, in the presence of a vast assemblage of people, the statue was unveiled with appropriate and impressive ceremonies. Hon. John F. House was the orator of the day, an original ode written by Rev. FE. W. B. Paschau was sung, prayer was offered by Rev. T. A. Hoyt, and a prize poem, by Mrs. Bowser, was read by Dr. G. 8. Blackie. A grand military procession paraded the street, in which several United. States officers, including Gen. Buell, Gen. Pennypacker and. others, together with Gen. Joseph E. Johnston, Gen. Cheatham and others of the old Confederate Army, participated. Clark Mills, the sculptor, was aking of the statue stated that it is a tripli- resident’s house in Washington, ses ae Te = a ee * — apne Sa STR PE ee an invited guest, and in spe cate of the one standing in front of the P which was not only the first equestrian statue ever self-poised on the hind feet, but was also the first ever modeled and cast in the United selected for representation in this statue occurred eae — ee haan eR aeRO 7 rpms oe ae amg nee napa ee See States. ‘The incident at the battle of New Orleans, on the 8th of January, 1815. The com- anced to the center of the lines in the act of tn ee age ee , mander-in-chief has adv The lines have come to present arms as a salute to their com- dges it by raising his chapeau four inches from SP review. mander, who acknowle his head according to the military etiquette of that period. But his restive horse, anticipating the next evolution, rears and attempts to dash down the line, while his open mouth and curved neck show that he is being controlled by the hand of his noble rider.” The statue was first placed on a temporary pedestal of wood, fronting northward, with the head of the horse turned toward the Capitol. April 6, 1881, an appro- priation of $2,000 was made for the purpose of placing a marble or granite base under the statue, which was accordingly done about three Ee ea eS me ane ee When AG a ee es Succ Sil Ee GROSSE = ———-- —- isso 9 - 1 t #{ Pry ‘ 1} Bie} ith ; a By | Petit 17 ieee baht (ae { ;. M 7 1 ' 24 A 2 ‘ a>; rtp heen years later. For some years previous to 1854 the State Library consisted entirely of donations from the General Government and from other States of the Union, and of the State’s own publications. Counting a large number of duplicates, there were about 10,000 volumes, but only about 1,500 or 2,000 separate works. The books were kept in a room which was deyot- ed to that purpose, in the Davidson County Court House, and which formed a-kind of passage-way or ante-room to the governor and secre- tary of states’ office, and the Representative Chamber.* It was conse- quently open all day, and even at night. On account of this negligence a large number of the law reports of the various States were misplaced, lost or stolen. In 1853, when the Legislature first met in the Capitol, the books were removed to that place, and by an act of January 20, 1854, the secretary of State was constituted ex officio librarian, with instruc- tions to keep the library open at least one day in the week. *The Legislature then met in the Court HouseHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. YS7 By the active endeavors of a few enlightened men who knew the great need of a State Library, the Legislature was induced to insert two sections referring to the library into the general appropriation bill of 1854, It appropriated $5,000 to purchase a library, and R. J. Meigs was appointed a commissioner to procure books. A very excellent se- lection of books was made, and the »y were placed in the north ante-7 of the library, the larger room not hayi ing been fitted up at that time. oom March 1, 1856, $500 per annum was appropriated to make additions to the library, and R. J. Meigs was appointed librarian at a salary of $500. With the exception of the years from 1861 to 1868. from that time until 1879 annual appropriations varying from $500 to $ $2,500 were made for the purchase of additional Hooke! Since 1871, however. no new books have been added. exce spt those Gee by exchange with other States. The libr ary now contains about 35,000 volumes of well- selected standard works, but in recent literature it is ve ry deficient. For the past eight years this institution has been under the manage- ment of Mrs. S. K. Hatton, and her daughter, Miss Emma Hatton. the assistant librarian, and too much praise can not be accorded them for the fidelity and courtesy with which they have disel harged their duties. The Tennessee Deaf and Dumb School owes its origin to the beneyo- Jent impulses and the prompt and persistent action of Gen. John Cocke of Grainger County, while a member of the senatorial branc oh of rh General Assembly. On December 20, 1843, a bill providing for the es- tablishment in Nashville of an institution for the blind, being on its third reading before the Senate, Gen. Cocke moved to eeue by the addition of a sectton providing for the appropriation of $2,000 for putting into operation at Knoxvi lle, adeaf and dumb school. Att ter the substitution of $1,000 for $2,000 the amendment was adopted, and then the entire bill was rejected by a vote of eleven to thirteen. On the following day the vote was reconsidered, and other amendments were adopted. The vote on Gen. Cocke’s amendment was reconsiderec L by a majority of three, but it was again adopted by a majority of one, and the bill was finally passed in the Senate December 21, 1843. The bill then went to the House. where on its third reading it was rejected by a majority of three, but the vote was subse- quently reconsidered, and the bill in the form in which it had left the Senate was passed January 29, 1844. The governor appointed, to constitute the first board of trustees, Messrs. R. B. McMullen, Joseph Estabrook and D. R. McAnally, who met at Knoxville, July 27, 1844, and organized by electing Mr. McMullen, president, and Mr. McAnally, secretary. These gentlemen immediately went to work with characteristic zeal, Se asep een A CR = 288 HISTORY OF ‘TENNESSEE. lence with officers of similar institutions in other opening correspon I s ae to the number and situation of the deat States, obtaining information as mutes in this State, selecting a suitable building in which to open the school, and securing the services of a competent instructor for the pupils. Rey. Thomas McIntire, a former teacher in the Ohio Deaf and Dumb School, was made the first principal, and under his charge the exercises of the school were begun in what was known as the Churchwell House, in Bast Knoxville, in June, 1845. By an act passed January 31, 1846, the General Assembly recognized the existence of.the institution, Incorpo- rated it, made better provision for its support, and added Messrs. T. Sul- lins. J. H. Cowan and Campbell Wallace to its board of trustees. It now became a leading object of the board to procure means for the erection of more appropriate buildings for the purposes of the school, and measures tending to that end were promptly undertaken and vigor- ously prosecuted. The board issued circular letters to the benevolent throughout the State, applied to Congress for a donation of public lands, established several local agencies, and fortunately placed in the position of manager of a general soliciting and collecting agency,* Col. John M. Davis, of Knox County. These efforts met with gratifying success, and over $4,000 was contributed by individuals. This sum, supplemented by appropriations made by the Legislature, enabled the trustees to erect a large and commodious building, at a cost of about.$20,000. As origin- ally built it consisted of a main building 25x79 feet and three stories high, with two wings of the same size as the main building, altogether forming a main front to the south of 100 feet, and east and west front of 129 feet each. The grounds belonging to the institution were obtained at different times by gift and purchase. They now embrace about eight acres lying in a rectangular form, entirely surrounded by streets, and are handsomely improved. The original site, consisting of two acres, was donated by Calvin Morgan, of Knoxville, and the remaining six acres were purchased at a cost of about $6,000. After becoming permanently established in the new building the school rapidly increased, both in numbers and efficiency. During the first session the number of pupils in attendance was nine, while in 1857 the number had increased to eighty. In the year 1861 the school was among the largest institutions of the kind in the country, and received a liberal support from the State. The whole building had been refur- nished in a creditable manner, and the grounds were highly ornamented. But the war came. The school was disbanded, and the buildings were taken possession of by the military authorities, and were used by the con- *Compiled from a report by Thomas L. Moses.HISTORY OF TENNESSER. 289 tending armies in turn for hospital purposes. In 1866 the buildings were turned over to the trustees in a badly damaged condition, and after some repairs had been made the school was again opened December 3 of that year. Owing to the financial embarrassment of the State +] appropriations to the institution for some time were supply its wants, and it required the exercise of the strictest economy on the part of its management to maintain the school. In 1873, however. the appropriation of $10,000 placed it upon a firm financial b since that time it has been in a most prosperous ec ago a new chapel was erected and other 1e scarcely adequate to asis, and ondition. - 1 B20 nN dn 1846 a charter nominating J. T’. Edgar, R. B. C. Howell, J. T. a sre pupils then numbered SE x =, F ' : { 4 “ \ Fi q ; i 5 ¢ t Ps ' Pies 6 j i Lee M Va ‘ tet {ye ri Gio . 4 ‘ a } -: et fl aie obs ‘ fi hie we f Les } y ) di tt aN 4 | | 4 thae i od ! a GT } i ] ; 1 rH r + 1 tg 4 77 4 2 ue ib \ ‘ : i fathpn | ) Re ; 246} 5 { ji rit wt : | $F i ie , hl § t M4 4 he } { ‘ j i j fi 4 f va Uh t ft ; j ik r 4 i : # { : i fd 4 te a4 L 4 i i - q i t | " ai }e a if 4 . ty ; : : 4 i. } a SEH ; , L 4 i " k . AA f } i 4 y al f | ¥ ‘ - a | i ; ; nd ee — xe aie pars SS ee em eS ate are rath a em aN nt sinistral an A pe ae 2 ae senprialiaie - pani ange meee ieee han. Sie pe rh ae el el yey 290 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ane as. OT Lk Wheat and A. L. P. Green, as a board of trustees, was granted to the school, and the annual appropriations for the next two years was increased to $2,500. The household and domestic department was placed under the control of Mrs. John Bell, Mrs. William H. Morgan, Mrs. Matthew Watson and Mrs. Joseph H. Marshall, all of whom had taken a deep in- terest in the institution from the frst. After serving as principal of the school less than two years, Mr. Churchman resigned the position to en- ter upon a broader field of labor in Indiana, and Mr. E. W. Whelan, of Philadelphia, was elected to take his place, which he retained until May, 1849, when he was succeeded by Jacob Berry, also of Philadelphia. In little more than a month Mr. Berry died of cholera, also the matron, steward, and several of the most promising pupils. Mr. Whelan volun- teered ‘» the midst of suffering and death to take charge of the school temporarily. His offer was accepted, and after holding the position a, short time he was succeeded by Mr. Fortescue, who resigned in about two months. These frequent changes in the managemant of the school and still:more the fatal visitation of cholera within the household, hin- dered its growth and retarded the improvement of the pupils. In November, 1850, J. M. Sturtevant was engaged to superintend the school. He took charge of it the following January, and for many years very acceptably performed the duties of the office. Im 1802 a lot was purchased from the University of Nashville, and an appropriation was made for the erection of a building upon it. By the following January a house sufficiently spacious to meet the requirements of the school was completed. Additions were afterward made, and the grounds gradually improved until June, 1861, the whole cost of buildings and grounds hay- ing been, up to that time, about $25,000. In November of that year the building was demanded for the accommodation of the sick and wounded Confederates. The trustees refused to give it up, and on the 18th of the month the immates “were summarily ejected.” The pupils who had no homes were distributed to privaté residences, and the furniture was stored away. After the Federals took possession of Nashville, in February, 1862, they continued to use it as a hospital until November, when by order of J. St. Clair Morton, Chief Engineer of the Army of the Ohio, the build- ing, together with all surrounding improvements, was entirely destroyed. At the close of the war a few of the pupils were collected and the school was reorganized. In October, 1872, Hon. John M. Lea, for $15,000, pur- chased the Claiborne residence with about seven acres of land, for the purpose of donating it to the ‘Tennessee School for the Blind, to which tt was conveyed immediately after the purchase. The Legislature of 1873HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 291 acknowledged the excellence of the location and 4] gift by appropriating $40,000 for the erection of a building ‘* commen- surate with the wants of a first-class lnstitution.”’ was employed, and it was decided to erect south sides of the mansion, 1e€ munificence of the A competent architect a wing on both the north and giving when completed, an entire front of 205 feet. To do this required additional appropriations. The next Gen- eral Assembly added $30,000 and the Legislature of 1879 set apart $34- 000 for the use of the school. a portion of which, it was provided, might building. About three years ago provision was made for the admission of e rate department was established for them. be expended in improvements upon the olored pupils, and a sepa- Although there are many larger institutions of the kind in t] lis COun- try. with more costly buildings and crounds., “ a/ & | yet in excellence of manage- ment and thoroughness of results, it is unexcelled. In addition to a literary education the boys are taught some simple mechanical trade, and the girls are instructed in sewing, and bead and other ornamental work. Much attention is also given to music. some of the graduates of that department having be come excellent teachers. The school is now under the superintendency of Prof. L. A. Bigelow, and in December, 1884, had an enrollment of sixty-nine pupils, eight of whom were colored. October 19, 1832, the Legislature passed an act to establish a lunatic hospital in this State, to be located in Davidson County, near Nashville. Francis Porterfield. Joseph Woods, Henry R. W. Hall. Felix Robertson and Samuel Hogg were appointe chase ; James Roane. d commissioners to pur- 1 site and to erect a building, for which purpose $10,000 were appropriated. A small tract of land. about one mile from th obtained, and the erection of the building begun. work progressed very slowly, and t e city, was From some cause the he asylum was not ready for occu- paney until 1840. Three years later there were only thirteen patients in the institution, which up to that time had cost the State over $56.000. In 1847 the well-known philanthropist, Miss D. L. Dix, visited Ten- nessee, and finding the accommodations for the Insane inadequate, me- morialized the Legislature, and aroused the representatives of the people to take action upon the subject. It was decided to dispose of the old hospital and grounds and to erect new buildings on some more favorable site. The old grounds were too small, the water supply insufficient, the location unhealthy, and the arrangement of the building itself not good By authority of the legislative act the governor appointed nine com- missioners to purchase a new site. They selected a large farm about six miles from Nashyille, on the Murfreesboro pike, one of the healthiestTS a & Fagg get i ag EI NS STS nae ca Se = 5 . ne ae reer mo Es ieee i # = 5 . ek — ke “ee a eS : cee a az : ip deehsemmess =~ — ee arin rap ero ee cere ote = ess r ~ . SSG ae RS eT =" ——— ee ae Se eee = = ak IE ok TENET an a ae pas hea an ene 7 ieee oe <2 nae tins = a a ten — i NTI ES re gee ee hhspevhapmastantntalet heal ppatient asian — RE. hie ei ee at NE PO 992, HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Dr. John S. Young was employed as superin- localities in the State. architect of the building to be erected. tendent and A. Heiman as Before entering upon their work they North and East for the purpose of perfecting their plans. Butler Asy- was finally chosen as a model, with a slight visited various asylums in the lum, of Providence, R. L., change in the architecture. In 1849, with an appropriation of $75,000, the work of erection began, and in April, 1852, the patients were removed from the old hos- pital. Two years later two large wings were added, making the whole building capable of accommodating 250 patients. During the entire process of erection Miss Dix, who has made a study of buildings of this character, lent her aid and assistance, and so highly was this apprecia- ted that a room was especially fitted up for her to occupy whenever she chose to visit the institution.* The Tennessee Hospital for the Insane is of the castellated style of architecture, with twenty-four octagonal towers of proportionate dimensions, placed on the corners of the main and its wings, while from the center of the main building rises tagonal tower, twenty-five feet above the roof, and sixteen feet A range of battlements from tower to tower surrounds the building a larger oc in diameter. whole edifice, following the angles of the several projections, giving a fine relief to it from any point of view. The extreme length of the main building and its wings trom east to west is 405 feet and 210 feet from north to south. There are two airing courts in this area, each about 150 feet square. The height of the main building from the ground to the top of the main tower is eighty-five feet. The center, right and left of the main building are four stories high without the basement; the interven- ing ranges and the wings are three stories high. Its interior arrange- ment and structure are in accordance with the most approved plans. In all the minutie of detail, the comfort, convenience and health of the patients have been very carefully studied. The ventilation of the build- ing is a decided feature in its construction. It is carried on by means of a centrifugal fan seventeen feet in diameter, driven by a steam-engine. The air is conducted through subterranean passages to the central cham- bers in the basement, and thence through the steam-pipe chambers into vertical flues passing through the entire building. The quantity of air discharged may be carried up to 70,000 cubic feet per minute to each occupant. Thus a constant supply of pure fresh air may be kept up during the most oppressive weather. The means of heating the build- ing are no less complete. ‘The series of vertical flues before alluded to are constructed in the longitudinal walls of the halls, starting from a coil *History of Davidson County and the Architect’s ReportHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 293 of pipe or hot-air chambers in the basement story, from the halls and rooms of the different stories near the floor. By this arrangement the air supply is constant without reference to any external condition of weather or temperature. Water is pumped by the engine from a reser- voir to a tank in the center of the building, and from thence distributed by pipes to other parts of the institution. Soon after the war suit- able quarters removed from the main building were erected by the State, at a cost of about $25,000, for the accommodation of the colored insane. The grounds now include 480 acres, and the entire property is valued at about $400,000. This admirably managed charity has been under the superintendency of Dr. John H. Callender for several years, and has accomplished a vast amount of good in extending the most helpful and tender ministra- tions to the suffering insane. In December, 1884, the whole number of patients in the institution was 412, of whom a few were colored. The annual cost per patient for the two years previous was $178.68. In 1883 the superintendent, as he had done in many previous reports, urged upon the Legislature the necessity of providing more accommodations for the insane of the State. At that session $80,000 was appropriated for the East Tennessee Insane Asylum, to be erected near Knoxville upon the property known as Lyon’s View, which the State had purchased for that purpose some time betore. Agreeably to the provision of the act mak- ing the appropriation the governor appointed KR. H. Armstrong, J. ©. Flanders and Columbus Powell, all of Knoxville, to constitute a board of directors, who promptly organized and elected W. H. Cusack, of Nash- ville, architect, and Dr. Michael Campbell, of Nashville, superintending physician of construction. The board of directors, with the superintend- ing physician and architect, after visiting some of the most famous asy- lums in the country, adopted a plan embracing the latest improvements, both sanitary and architectural, The asylum consists of nine buildings, including an administration building, chapel, kitchen, laundry, boiler- house and engine-house. The main front is 472 feet long. The wards consist of 174 rooms that will accommodate from 250 to 300 patients. In 1885 the original appropriation had been exhausted, and an additional sum of $95,000 was granted by the Legislature for the completion of the buildings. The asylum was ready for occupancy March 1, 1886, and a transfer of the patients belonging to Kast ‘Tennessee was made. No more beautiful and desirable spot could have been chosen for an insane asy- lum than Lyon’s View. Within four miles of the city of Knoxville, high in elevation, commanding a full view of the river and the adjacent heights with their attractive scenery, the location possesses 1 itself all the994 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. requirements that could possibly be desired in an institution designed for the comfort, care and cure of the unfortunate insane.* The asylum itself is one of the most stately and best equipped in the country, and stands an honorable monument to the munificent charity of Tennessee. Even with these two large asylums it was found that not all of this Foe I pei im ne ae ee ecceieeee gree Fe tee cee = nee = ee = unfortunate class, who are peculiarly the wards of the State, could be accommodated, and an appropriation of $85,000 was made for the erec- tion of a similar institution in West Tennessee. John M. Lea, John H. Callendar and W. P. Jones were appointed commissioners to select a site and superintend the construction of the buildings. These commissioners, Paeticeetoemtane ; ; eer . ee wpeprcaleoagurdiccaipaed > hase Ray ile pence Cr a ee an ee nn cnt at pew as = ~~ — — Es a - pee neers oan after spending several weeks in visiting and carefully examining several places, selected a point between three and four miles northwest of Bolj- var, in Hardeman County. The structure will be of brick with white ee ee Aen ae Sein 2% amy er al stone trimmings. Its length will be 750 feet, with a depth of 40 feet. ——S The central or main portion of the building will be five stories high, and LS + a a eer ad will be occupied by the offices and demons apartments of the officers On either side of the main building are to be two sections four ones high, separated from each other by fire-proof walls. Between the tiers of rooms will be large corridors, and above each corridor lofty flues, all so arranged as to secure perfect ventilation and sufficient light. The building will cost over $200,000, without the furnishing, and will accom- modate 250 patients. Previous to the ; adoption of the penitentiary system, the sey erity of the penal laws of the State tended rather to increase than to decrease the number of crimes committed. As the means of punishment were limited to the whipping-post, stocks, pillory, county jail, the branding-iron and the gallows, the penalties were either lighter than could prove effective, or else in severity out of all proportion to the offense committed. In either case the result was the same, the sever e penalty frequently pre- venting pe The penalty, as expressed in the followi ing act passed Deo 23, 1799, is an example of the punishments inflicted for crimes of that ec Be tt enacted, ‘‘That from and after the passage of this act any person who shall be guilty of feloniously stea ling, taking or carrying aw ay any horse, mare or gelding, shall for such offense suffer death without bene fit of clergy.’ For some years after the organization of the State many of the penal laws remained the same as before its separation from North Carolina. In 1807 an act was passed by the General Assembly fixing a somewhat lighter penalty for several felonies. For grand larceny, arson and malicious prosecution, the penalty for the first offense was the infliction upon the bare back of a number of lashes. not to exceed thirty-nine, ear ores 2 = Saeaee = Finer a *Goy. Bate. = ——— Rea ee hes ae RsHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 295 imprisonment in the county jail for a term not to exceed twelve months, and to ‘‘be rendered infamous, according to the laws of the land.” For the second offense, the penalty was death. ‘The penalties for forgery and perjury were even more severe. In the earlier days of civilization such punishments would have been deemed mild, but at the time in which these laws were passed, the growth of humanizing influences rendered their cruelty apparent, and not infrequently the culprit escaped convic- tion more on account of the sympathy of the judge and jury than from a lack of sufficient evidence against him. ‘This fact was recognized, and the successive governors in nearly every message urged upon the General Assembly the necessity of establishing a penitentiary. In 1813 an act was passed requiring the clerk of each county court to keep a subscrip- tion list for the purpose of permitting persons ‘‘ to subscribe any amount they may think proper for erecting a penitentiary.” This plan of raising money for that purpose was not a success, as four years later the total sum subscribed amounted to only $2,173.40, a great part of which the committee appointed to investigate the matter thought could not be col- lected. In 1819 Gov. McMinn again brought the subject before the Legislature. In his message he says: “ Notwithstanding some fruitless oo attempts have been made toward establishing a penitentiary in this State, yet I think it my duty to bring the subject before you, and with an earnest hope that in your wisdom and in your love of humanity and jus- tice you will lend your aid in commencing a work which will do lasting honor to its founders.” Nothing more, however, was done until October 298. 1829, when the act providing for the building of the penitentiary became a law. The ground selected for the site of the institution con- tains about ten acres, and is situated about one mile southwest of the court house in Nashville. Contracts for the building were let in April, 1830: and work was immediately begun, under the supervision of the architect. David Morrison. ‘The rock used in its construction was quarried upon the ground, and so vigorously was the work prosecuted that a proclamation was issued by the governor January 1, 1831, an- nouncing the penitentiary open to receive prisoners. At the same time the revised penal code went into effect. The following description of the building as it originally appeared is taken from a Nashville paper issued December 7, 1830: ‘‘The principal front of the building presents a southern exposure, is 310 feet long, and consists of a center and two wings. The former, shehtly projecting, is composed of brick embel- lished with cut stone dressing, 120 feet long, 32 feet wide, and three stories high. It contains the warden and keeper’s apartments, two in- firmaries, an apartment for confining female convicts, and sundry otherEOE RT 296 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. lia = Some = % : sa a rooms for the use of the establishment. In surveying the front of the center building, the most conspicuous feature that strikes the eye is a large gateway in the center 23 feet high, 14 feet wide, the pe and arch being formed of large blocks of well-polished white stone, and filled by a massive wrought iron port-cullis weighing nearly a ton. The wings are constructed of large blocks of well-dressed lime stone, the wall being 4 0 ene eee eno feet thick and 33 feet high, pierced with narrow, grated windows corre- per ta aw peat Se ag — Se cen ne Sse ier 2 , ae or, a ae ws sr ee ee Sins — fre aan rates ae ee 1867 two large workshops, known respectively as the east and west aie! ii i | sponding in height with those of the center. On the center of the build- i i HI i ing, and immediately over the gateway above described) rises a splendid HU | el Dorie cupola that accords with the noble proportions of the whole. In Hi a the rear of the building a wall 30 feet high incloses an area of 310 ih i I square feet. At each angle of the wall is a tower for the purpose of i i i viewing the establishment.” The entire cost of the building was about I} ih eth | $50,000. In 1857 the west wing was added at a cost of $36,000, and in Pea HE | yi shops, were built. ‘The first prisoner received into the institution was W. G. Cook, from Madison County. It is stated that he was a tailor, and was convicted of malicious stabbing and assault and battery. He ee een ~ - — i a ae aa ae satya, eA ree A th rn a meena ag ace aida stabbed a man with his shears, and assaulted him with his goose.* He was made to cut and make his own suit, the first work done in the peni- tentiary. In June, 1833, the cholera began its ravages among the in- ete | mates. Its progress was so rapid that in a few days business was entir ely suspended, and an extra force of nurses and physicians was employed. Out of eighty-three convicts not one escaped the disease, and nineteen of the number died. The following year the disease again broke out, but was not so destructive in its results as before. While the number of prisoners was small, they were employed by the State under the supervision of ap pointed officers, in the manufacture of various articles of trade. In 1833 they were classified under the follow. ing departments: shoe-makers. coopers, stone-cutters, tailors, chair-mak- ers, hatters, blacksmiths, wagon-makers. carpenters and_ brick- layers. Other departments were afterward added and some of the above dropped, the aim of the State being to employ as far as possible the convicts upon such work as would come into the least competition with private manu- facturers. This system was employed with more or less success until 1866, when the inspectors reported that for the previous thirty-three years the insti- tion had cost the State an aver age of $15,000 per year. The Legislature at that session passed an act establishin were authorized to lease the prison, mac 1g a board of three directors, who hinery and convicts to the high- “*Warden’ s Report, 1884. SeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 997 est bidders for a term of four years. The lease was made to the firm of Hyatt, Briggs & Moore, afterward Ward & Briggs, at 40 cents per day for ti: each conviec It was agreed upon the part of the State to provide the necessary guards to preserve discipline. The firm entered upon the fulfill- ment of the contract. In May, L867, 300 convicts joined in an attempt to escape, and created great excitement. Quiet was restored without bloodshed, but the mutinous spirit was not quelled, and the following month they succeeded in setting fire to the east shops, which were de- stroyed. A difficulty then arose between the State and the lessees. The latte refused to pay for the labor and claimed damages from the State for this failure to preserve discipline and for the losses occasioned by the fire. The lease was terminated by mutual agreement July 1, 1869, and the matter compromised by the State paying the lessees $132,200.64 for the material on hand, and in settlement of the damages claimed by them. In December, 1571, provision was again made for leasing the prisoners and shops. The contract was taken Dye EL Cherry, Thomas O’Con- nor, A. N. Shook and Gen. W. T. C. Humes, under the firm style of Cherry, O'Connor & Co. The second lease was taken: December 1, 1876, by Messrs. Cherry, O’Connor, A. N. Shook and William Morrow, under the old firm name, with M. Allen as superintendent of the works. The lease system has proven highly satisfactory. Instead of requiring al- most yearly appropriations for its support, the institution now pays an annual revenue to the State of $101,000. The present lease, which is for six years, began January 1, 1884, the Tennessee Coal, Iron & Rail- road Company being the lessees. The headquarters of this company are at Tracy City, where about one third of the prisoners are worked in the mines, and where a large and commodious prison has been erected. There are also branch prisons at the Inman mines in Marion County, and Coal Creek in Anderson County. A few prisoners are worked in marble works at Knoxville. About 40 per cent of the entire number are at the main prison, where they are worked under a sub-lease by Cherry, Morrow & Co. The firm is engaged exclusively in the manufacture of wagons. The shops are equipped with all the latest improved machinery, enabling them to turn out about fifty finished wagons per day. In the manufact- ure of their wagons they begin with the raw material, making their own bent-work, iron-work, castings, thimbles and skeins. Their goods are sold throughout the South and Southwest, and also in several of the Northern and Western States. Under the present lease system the State is relieved from all expense of transportation and guarding of prisoners. The only officers connected } i : } } I } i \ } | ‘i ) ‘ eI a = i La } } | vdi] ? Fi " ‘ a NS E — ee ——— 298 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. with the institution who are paid by the State are the warden, superin- tendent, physician and chaplain. The number of convicts in the main prison and branches, December 1, 1884, was 1,323; in 1880, the number was 1,241; in 1o1O? O13 1857, 286, and in 1839. 154. During the late war the penitentiary was converted into a military prison, and at one time there were as many as 2400 inmates. ‘Two fires, the former quite destructive, occurred within the past five years. December 4, 1881, the various workshops and ma- chinery belonging to the State and the lessees, were destroyed by fire, only the main building and cells escaping destruction. At the time over 700 convicts were within the walls, and it became necessary to turn them all out into the space in front of the prison; yet, so well were they man- aged, that only six escaped. The shops were immediately rebuilt by the State, and the lessees put in new machinery. On January 12, 1884, the east end of the blacksmith shop was discovered to be on fire, and as the second story was used as a paint shop it threatened to prove very de- eee: c 3 = Pee OS We on wcstaih omc SS ee TST ~ ———- a et Sa ona ie iran vga a ae rare ee 3 gris DRE i Sed we ~ eee Nee ee ine 3 ee. " oe RE re 2 i Ti in Gi ge " = Wad ges ae ne = ge c= . ee aes ie mee - anand ial et ae ees aye i onions Fi i < selai esi f = ee = eects : i eee 4 eerrertmeeoeerg 5) Se ae me | aaa oS ealing: an nla oo SPT Tarts ————— = Lae on <= a IE Ma aan ern i ppg Oar amnire ages + aT 7 eR a structive. It was, however, soon brought under control. The loss to the State was about $3,300, which was fully covered by insurance. *Many years ago a society for the collection and preservation of his- torical papers, relics, antiquities, etc., existed in Nashville.+ It did not accomplish much, but its very organization showed the tendency of the minds in the city noted for scholarly attainments to endeavor to rescue from oblivion the history of a people remarkable for patriotism, chivalry and intelligence. After it had ceased to exist for a considerable time several public-spirited citizens met in the library-rooms of the Merchants’ Association, to reorganize an historical society. This was in May, 1849, and the organization was effected by the election of Nathaniel Cross as president; Col. A. W. Putnam, vice-president; William A. EKichbaum, treasurer; J. R. Eakin, corresponding secretary, and W. F. Cooper, re- cording secretary. This society did not exist many years, but was again brought to life in 1857, and at the May meeting elected the following officers: A. W. Putnam, president; Thomos Washington, vice-president ; W. A. Eichbaum, treasurer; R. J. Meigs, Jr., corresponding secretary ; Anson Nelson, recording secretary, and John Meigs, hbrarian. Contri- butions of valuable manuscripts, newspapers and relics poured in from all parts of the State, as well as a few from other States. A public anniversary meeting took place on the Ist of May, 1858, in Watkin’s Grove. An immense procession of old soldiers of the war of 1812, the Creek war, the Mexican war, the officers and cadets of the Western Military Institute, the Shelby Guards, the Nashville Typo- * *Prepared by Anson Nelson, Esgq., recording secretary, +The Tennessee Antiquarian Society, organized July 1,1820. Discontinued in August, 1822 ite anda . ~ 7 caer OE ee on ae reel a ~ ve Li i a Hil i} i Hy it Mel Hy itt ruil AN qi Hi if | Hi | ie gata! He hig Wiens ati thE i ne202 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The present officers of the society are Hon. John M. Lea, president; Ex-Gov. James D. Porter, first vice-president ; Capt. Albert T. McNeal, second vice-president ; Joseph GQ Carels, treasurer ; James A. Cart- wright, corresponding secretary; Anson Nelson, recording secretary ; Robert T. Quarles, librarian. The Medical Society of Tennessee* was incorporated by an act of 9. 1830, one hundred and fifty-four the Legislature, passed January physicians from the various coun charter. Certain powers and privileges were granted, among which was f censors. for the three divisions of the State, ties of the State being named in the o = Bs = ae a aa ee AML hal eae latin eo mee - paaoel adem mae the power to appoint boards o to grant licenses to applicants to prac first meeting of the society was held in Nashville May 3, 1830, and its SS mene e tice medicine within its limits. The pa ps oom os Sa a ee ae Seek i > AWE ne sc RT an Hi appropriated for the purchase of suitable grounds for the biennial fairs ; . na yj ei . - r . . 1c at i HI to be held at Nashville, and State bonds to that amount were issued. A |: hea cues . . ee sre PN | eee rit A lat tract of land containing thirty-nine acres, lying on. Brown's Creek, was tHe Hh Bi il | . .. . . 2 i 2 thy — — Seren 2 Ha | purchased from John Trimble for the sum of $17,750. The work of Patt Bie . . iate : r t K yh f nik fitting up the crounds was immediately begun, and by October they were a itt Wa sufficiently improved to admit of holding the annual fair upon them. en Bias ii f : e , i ; Pua i, The fair of that year, however, was not so successful as previous ones, + LeU Dain 3 : 7 au . 7. ie i owing to unfavorable weather, and to the excitement incident to the Netra Bi 2 . . . r ; Nore : ry hb re presidential campaign than in progress. The improvements of the He 1 grounds was completed during the following year, and from the secre- en tary’s report it appears that the entire cost of the grounds and improve- tel “ | i j Th ¢ f| | ments exceeded $30,0V00. | The sixth and last annual fair was begun on October 10, 1859, and B | . r 2 ay % > e | continued six days. This was one of the most successful fairs held. on The number of people in attendance on the second day was estimated at Vi is i | 10.000, to which assemblage an elaborate and instructive address was de- | livered by Lieut. M. I’. Maury. He In the reports made by the officers of the society much regret is ex- ain pressed at the lack of interest in making creditable exhibits of stock and | a other farm products. But the greatest good derived from these annual |e oO oO iia fairs came from the addresses delivered by scientific men like Lieut. a | Maury. They served to give the farmer a broader idea of his profession thi and to awaken him to the fact that there is a science of agriculture. i li = a E > . 2 . * it During the war, as a matter of course, the agricultural societies were | He suspended, and but little effort has since been made to revive them. In Pe 1870 the old fair grounds of the State Agricultural Society were sold by bie | a committee appointed by the Legislature, consisting of the secretary of i i | a _ > * | da state, comptroller and treasurer. le Biale | In December, 1871, an act was passed authorizing the governor to | a appoint two citizens from each grand division of the State, as commis- | va sioners of agriculture, to constitute a bureau of agriculture. ‘They were i | required to meet once each year, and were allowed to appoint a secretary, ’ Ri . : Pi) BeOS ; i et at a salary of $600 per year. ‘T’he Legislature of 1875 abolished this Hal Ras Ae . | a department, and in its stead established the Bureau of Agriculture, Sta- R bi | avert oo NT 2 = 2 ? . > . | Ht i tistics and Mines, to be under the control of a commissioner appointed if | ab Wie ) ed ii {| } ea i | Ha f iW!HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 309 by the governor. It is made the duty of the commissioner to collect specimens of all the agricultural and mineral products of the State; to analyze and inspect fertilizers sold in the State; to study the insects in- jurious to crops; to study the diseases of grain, fruit and other crops, and to collect statistics bearing upon these subjects. He is also allowed to employ a chemist and geologist to assist him in his researches. At the same time a bureau of immigration was established for the purpose of encouraging immigration to the State. Two years later the duties of this office were imposed upon the Bureau of Agriculture, Statistics and Mines, which had been placed under the control of J. B. Killebrew, as commissioner, a man of great ability, and untiring energy. He did much to make known the immense natural resources of the State; he wrote and published works on ‘‘Wheat Culture,”’ ‘* Tennessee Grasses and Cereals,” ‘“‘The Mineral Wealth of the State,” ‘Sheep Husbandry,” and an extensive work entitled ‘‘The Resources of Tennessee,” all admirably well written. For the past three years the bureau has been under the efficient management of A. J. McWhirter. The first charter issued to a Masonic Lodge in Tennessee was grant- ed in accordance with a petition received by the Grand Lodge of North Carolina. December 17, 1796. The lodge was organized in Nashville, and was known as St. Tammany, No. 1. The Grand Lodge of North Carolina continued its authority over Tennessee until 1812. During the same period a charter was issued to one lodge in this State by the "Grand Lodge of Kentucky, and a dispute arose between these two grand lodges in regard to their jurisdiction. In 1805 the Grand Secretary of the Grand Lodge of North Carolina was directed to write to the Grand Lodge of Kentucky, and request them to call in all dispensations or charters granted to lodges in Tennessee. ‘The request was not complied with, and two years later it was renewed with the warning that, if it were not heeded. all communication between them would cease. The difficulty, however, was not settled until a separate Grand Lodge for Tennessee was established. On December 11, 1811, a convention, consisting of representatives from all the lodges in Tennessee, met at Knoxville. Resolutions fayor- ing the formation of a separate grand lodge were passed, and an address to the Grand Lodge of North Carolina prepared. This address was re- ceived by the Grand Lodge at its next meeting in December, 1812, and the petition for a separate grand lodge oranted. Accordingly Grand Master Robert Williams called a convention to meet in Knoxville, on December 27, 1813, at which time a charter, or deed ot reling uishment, from the Grand Lodge of North Carolinia was presented. This charter ee ee —— ee ———————— —-us en ee ‘a Teese ee ae oe ee OV 2m mi) iw ih i 310 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. is still on file in the archives of the Grand Lodge, and is said to be the only charter of the kind in the United States. oes ‘The officers installed the first meeting were Thomas Claiborne, Grand Master; George Wilson, Deputy Grand Master ; yon Hall, Se- nior Grand Warden; Abraham K. Shaifer, Junior Grand Warden; Thom- as McCarry, Grand Treasurer and Senior Grand Deacon; Edward Scott, Grand Secretary and Junior Grand Deacon. At the meeting held in SIE asaeneae We eet h : iia eb) yi ra a tf re SH iol él Hie ee rhether the subordin: ces He July following a controversy arose as to whether the sub nate lodges could work under their old charters. It was finally decided to allow them Shwe to do so until new charters could be granted The constitution as originally adopted provided that the meetings of the Grand Lodge should be held at the place where the Legislature con- vened. In 1815 this was amended, and Nashville was permanently fixed as the place of meeting. Quarterly meetings of the Grand Lodge were held until October, 1819, when they were abolished. Ata called meet- ing on May 4, 1825, Gen. La Fayette, who was then visiting Nashville, was elected an honorary member of the Grand Lodge, and during the day was introduced to the lodge by Gen. Jackson. The Grand Master delivered an address of welcome, to which Gen. La Fayette replied. An it elegant oration was then delivered by William G. Hunt, J. G. W., after which a banquet terminated the exercises. At the annual meeting held in October, 1825, Gen. Samuel Houston Se oe eendipenenttore : hae co at anes can aaa ge = Mo gta venti hI mate. ate 9a era gate Sane = cara a y ss : ae ae s 7 ; ss pee ea ee =o eR EE =F MG cage pe nN AIEEE DE ALOR NO a LOA ~ a presented a memorial concerning a difficulty which had arisen between him-and another: member of Cumberland Lodge, No. 8. Upon hearing Tae sae a the case the committee completely exonerated Gen. Houston from all FPP ee Tira a ce AB OP seen charges of unmasonic conduct, but two years later he was suspended by his lodge. He appealed to the Grand Lodge, but the decision of the —— = ‘ AAT ArCaA r rahief ° Qa 1c x x subordinate lodge was not reversed. The chief grounds of his suspen- sion was his having fought a duel with another Mason, Gen. White. The constitution and by-laws of the Grand Lodge were amended in 1822, and again in 1830. In 1845 a new constitution was adopted. a October 6, 1858, the corner-stone of the Masonic Temple at Nashville: ” ee Soro ea Satin S teacite. was laid with the usual ceremonies. Since that time but little of general i interest has transpired in the proceedings of the Grand Lodge. During the yellow fever epidemic of 1878, the order was active in relieving the: | suffering, and over $24,000 was contributed for that purpose. In 1885 the Grand Lodge had jurisdiction over 409 subordinate lodges with a. membership of 15,263. The following is a complete list of the’ Past Lai Grand Masters of the Grand Lodge: tea Thomas Claiborne, 1813; Robert Searcy, 1815; Wilkins Tannehill, i | 11817; O. B. Hays, 1819; Wilkins Tannehill, 1820; Andrew Jackson, —— —e | \ '* ij oiHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 311 1822; Wilkins Tannehill, 1824; Matthew D. Cooper, 1825; William E. Kennedy, 1827; Hugh W. Dunlap, 1829; Archibald Yell, 1831; Dudley S. Jennings, 1832; Harry L. Douglass, 1833; Benjamin S. Tappan, 1834; J. C. N. Robertson, 1836; Philander Priestly, 1837; Samuel Me- Manus, 1838; George Wilson, 1840; Wilkins Tannehill, 1841; John Novell, 1843; Edmund Dillahunty, 1844; William L. Martin, 1846: Hardy M. Burton, 1848; Robert L. Caruthers, 1849; Charles A. Fuller, 1850; A. M. Hughes, 1852; John S. Dashiell, 1854; Thomas McCulloch, 1856; John Frizzell, 1858; James McCallum, 1860*; A. M. Hughes, 1863; Thomas Hamilton, 1864; Joseph M. Anderson, 1866; Jonathan S. Dawson, 1868; John W. Paxton, 1869; John C. Brown, 1870; W. M. Dunaway, 1871; D. R. Grafton, 1872; James D. Richardson, . 1873: Andrew J. Wheeler, 1874; J. C. Cawood, 1875; E. Edmundson, 1876; A. V. Warr, 1877; George C. Connor, 1878; Wilbur F. Fowler, 1879: J. QT. Irion, 1880; N. S. Woodward, 1882; N. W. McConnell, 1883: B. R. Harris, 1884; H. M. Aiken, 1885; Thomas O. Morris, 1886. The following is a list of the present grand officers: Thomas O. Morris, Nashville, M. W. Grand Master; Caswell A. Good- loe, Alamo, R. W. Deputy Grand Master; H. H. Ingersoll, Knoxville, R. W. Senior Grand Warden; John T. Williamson, Columbia, R. W. Junior Grand Warden; William H. Morrow, Nashville, R. W. Grand Treasurer: John Frizzell, Nashville, R. W. Grand Secretary; Rev. C. H. Strickland, Nashville, R. W. Grand Chaplain; H. W. Naff, Bristol, Wor. Senior Grand Deacon; H. P. Doyle, Dyersburg, Wor. Junior Grand Deacon; P. H. Craig, Waynesboro, Wor. Grand:Marshal; N. A. Senter, Hum- boldt, Wor. Grand Sword Bearer; A. C. Robeson, Athens, Wor. Grand Steward; M. P. Prince, Minor Hill, Wor. Grand Pursuivant; Ewin Burney, Nashville, Wor. Grand Tyler. The Grand Council of Tennes- see Royal and Select Master Masons was organized October 13, 1847, with the following officers: Dyer Pearl, T. I. Grand Master; William R. Hodge, G. Prin. C. of Work; Joseph F. Gibson, Grand Treasurer; Charles A. Fuller, Grand Recorder. Since that time the following have filled the chair of Grand Master: John S. Dashiell, 1849; Henry F. Beaumont, 1850; John P. Campbell, 1851-52; James Penn, 1853; Jonathan Huntington, 1854; L. Hawkins, 1855; Edward W. Kinney, 1856; Robert Chester, 1857; H. M. Lusher, 1858; Jonathan Huntington, 1859; John H. Devereux, 1860; John Frizzell, 1861; William Maxwell, 1860, John McClelland, 1866; William H. McLeskey, 1867; David Cook, 1868; W. F. Foster, ° 1869; A. V. Ware, 1870; James {cCallum, 1871; A. P. Hall, 1872; E. *No meetings‘held in 1861 and 1862. wh a sr} Fi _ 7 yor = o yyy be - os i, wr, 7; = ~—\ a od — bo HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Edmundson, 1873; W. R. Shaver, 1874; He Me fikens Uso Dek: Haller. 1876: Bradford Nichol, 1877; B. R. Harris, 1878; George H. Morgan, 1879: Ewin Burney, 1880-82; William Matthews, 1883; P. C. Wright, 1884. The Grand Chapter was organized April 5, 1826, with the following officers: William G. Hunt, Grand High Priest; Wilkins Tannehill, Deputy Grand High Priest; Ed H. Steele, Grand King; Dyer Pearl, Grand Scribe: Moses Stevens, Grand ‘Treasurer; and crore Cooper, eee ron = = jee eee SS ee oe RET a Re : —— Tis - " S . ° a | The order of the Knights of Pythias was introduced by the estab- i | lishment of Holston Lodge, No. 1, at Knoxville, Tenn., in March, 1872. ie ye — ; ; Lae ae eg | all | | He am | a nn Pix! ee ADHISTORY OF TENNESSER, 319 Soon after lodges were established at Chatt and other points throughout the State. at Nashville. Api LD: New Jersey. anooga, Nashville. Memphis, The Grand Lodge w by Supreme Chancellor There were present represe ston Lodge, No. 1, of Knoxville: Myrtle Lodge, No. 3, of Nashville: Bayard Lodge, No. 4. of Murfreesboro: Tennessee Lodge, No. 5, and Memphis Lodge, No. 6, both of Memphis. The first Grand Chancellor was Calvin McCorkle. of Knoxville. resentatives to the Supreme Lodge elected at the Thompson, of Nashville, and W. R. Butler organization of the Grand Lodge the chancellors have been T. S. Jukes. of Memphis; Alexander Allison. of Knoxville; W. P. Robertson, of Jack- son; J. J. Atkins, of Knoxville: B. Owen, of Clarksville: H. S. Reyn- olds, of Memphis: R. L. C. White. of Lebanon; E.. S, Mallory, of Jack- son; R. J. Wheeler, of Nashville: W. C. Caldwell, of Trenton; W. RB. Carlile, of Chattanooga: George S. Seay, of Gallatin: L, D. McCord, of Pulaski, and M. M. Niel. of Trenton, the present incuml H. S. Reynolds, was chairman of K. phis during the yellow fever epidemic o discharging his duties, until as organized , Samuel R aad. of ntatives from six lodges: Hol- Damon Lodge, No. 2. of Chattanooga; The rep- same time are W. Brice , of Murfreesboro. Since the ent. of P. Relief Committee at Mem- t 1878, and remained in the elty, he fell ill and died of the disease. In recog- nition of his noble work and sacrifice of his life the Supreme Lodge of aced his name on the rol] of Past 1e following words: “The name of Brother Reyn- ‘olds is placed upon the list of Past Grand C} during his term as Grand Chancellor : ‘duty, and immortalized ] the World, by special dispensation, pl Grand Chancellors in 4] 1ancellors, though he died but he died nobly at his post of 11S Name in the annals of Pythian Knighthood.” There are at present twenty-six lo gate membership of 2,012. dition, there being on hand in the treasuries of subordinate lodges on December 31, 1885. the amount of $5,543.64 cash, while the value of lodge furniture and real estate is estimated at $21,597. The Grand off- cers, elected at Clarksville. in May 1886, are as follows: Sitting Past Grand Chancellor, George EK. Seay, of Gallatin; Grand Chancellor, M. M. Neil, of Trenton: Grand Vice-Chancellor, Henry W. Morgan, of Nashville; Grand Prelate. G. B. Wilson, of Clarksville; Grand Keeper and Recorder of Seals, R. L. C. White, of Lebanon; Grand Master of Ex- chequer, W. A. Wade, of Milan; Grand Master of Arms, T. C. Latimore. of Chattanooga; Grand Inner Guard. E. I. Bullock, of Jackson; Grand Outer Guard, W. G. Sadler, of Nashville: and representatives to the Supreme Lodge, George HE. Seay, of Gallatin. and RB. I, C. White, of Lebanon. lves in the State, with an ag ore- Financially the order is in excellent con- nay —— eet ana Saar tao oe Se Denna = an ee Se320 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE The Grand Council of the American Legion of Honor was organized at Nashville, August 3, 1882, by Deputy Supreme Commancacer Michael Brooks. Past Commanders from ten councils throughout the State were present, and the following Grand officers were elected: George F. Hager, Past Grand Commander, Nashville; S. H. Day, Grand Command- er, Cleveland; George F. Fuller, Grand Vice-Commander, Nashville; W. 7. Mitchell, Grand Orator, Memphis; Frank Winship, Grand Secretary, Pulaski; Frank A. Moses, Grand Treasurer, Knoxville; J. Radomsky, Grand Guide, Nashville; E. G. Buford, Grand Sentry, Pulaski; W. Z. Mitchell, George F. Hager and Julius Ochs, Grand Trustees. George F. Hager was also chosen representative to the Supreme Council. The growth of this order in Tennessee as in other States, has been rapid, and owing to ‘ts careful and economical management it 1s im a splendid condition financially. There are now in the State sixteen sub- ordinate councils with a membership of about 900. The Grand Couneil now holds biennial sessions. The following are the present officers: George F. Hager, Grand Commander, Nashville; Joseph Wassaman, Grand Vice-Commander, Chattanooga; W. Z%. Mitchell, Grand Orator, Memphis; Alexander Allison, Past Grand Commander, Knoxville; F. ©. Richmond, Grand Secretary, Knoxville: F. A. Moses, Grand Treasurer, Knoxville; John T. Rogers, Grand Guide, Cleveland; Samuel Strauss, Grand Chaplain, Chattanooga; Henry Benzing, Grand Warden, Nash- ville; L. Williams, Grand Sentry, Cleveland. W. Z. Mitchell, Memphis;. John B. Everitt, Nashville; Henry Benzing, Nashville, Grand ‘T'rustees. The Ancient Order of United Workmen originated in Meadville, Penn., in October, 1868. The first lodge organized in Tennessee was Ten- nessee Lodge, No. 2, ‘nstituted at Nashville, November 26, 1876. When this lodge was organized it was supposed that Lodge No. 1 had been j | } : ' formed at Memphis, but this was found to be a mistake, and consequent- ly there has been no lodge of that number in the State. On February 29. 1877. representatives from six subordinate lodges met in Nashville,. ’ 2 i Oo , and organized a Grand Lodge with the following officers: Dr. G. Schiff, Past Grand Master Workman; John W. Childress, Grand Master Work- man; John M. Brooks, Grand Foreman; D. W. Hughes, Grand Overseer; Thomas H. Everett, Grand Recorder; J. M. Barnes, Grand Receiver; P. R. Albert, Grand Guide; C. A. Thompson, Grand Watchman; Dr. G. Schiff, John Frizzell and John W. Childress, Supreme Representatives. According to the provisions of the constitution adopted, the meetings of the Grand Lodge are held at Nashville on the third Tuesday in January. Annual sessions were held until 1883, when biennial sessions were sub- stituted. In 1878 the number of subordinate lodges was thirteen, with a ee er SeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 391 membership of 742. There are now in the State fifty-four lodges and 1,900 members. The A. O. U. W. is said to be the oldest beneficiary ‘secret society in this country. It embraces in its membership men of every vocation, profession and occupation. employes and employers, workers of all classes. It has no connection with any religious sect or political party, but is designed to promote mental and social improve- ment and mutual assistance. The amount paid in benefits in Tennessee since its introduction into the State is over $562,000. The order of Royal Arcanum originated in Massachusetts, where the Supreme Council was incorporated November 5, 1877. The first council established in Tennessee was Nashville Council, No. 98, organized May 22, 1878, with twenty-eight charter members. During the next eight- een months councils were organized at Memphis, Knoxville, Chatta- nooga, Tracy City, Shelbyville, Edgefield, South Nashville, and a second lodge in Nashville. On February 20, 1878, official notice was received that a dispensation to form a Grand Council of the Royal Arcanum for the State would be granted upon the assembling of a sufficient number of Past Regents to constitute the same at Pythian Hall, Nashville, on March 9, following. In accordance with this notice a meeting was held at which were present twelve Past Regents, representing seven subordinate councils. The following officers were elected: A. B. Tavel, Grand Re- gent; W..Z. Mitchell, Grand Vice-Regent; A. M. Shook, Grand Orator: J. B. Everett, Past Grand Regent; I. K. Chase, Grand Secretary; T. H. Everett, Grand Treasurer; R. A. Campbell, Grand Chaplain; W. C. Dib- rell, Grand Guide; T. M. Schleier, Grand Warden; W. P. Phillips, Grand Sentry. Supreme Regent J. M. Swain then proceeded at once to in- stall the Grand officers, after which he pronounced the Grand Council legally instituted. A constitution was adopted, and the first session was closed. Since that time meetings of the Grand Council have been held in Nashville in March of each year. Although the growth of the order in the State has not been rapid, it has been remarkably well managed, and is now one of the most prosperous of the beneficiary societies. The number of members in Tennessee January 1, 1880, was 549. January 1, 1886, it was 1,106, distributed among twelve subordinate councils. ‘Since that time Hermitage Council has been organized in North Nash- ville, with twenty-three charter members. Of the Widows’ and Ophans'’ Benefit Fund there was received, in the six years from 1880 to 1885 in- clusive, $105,383.01, while for the same period there was disbursed $168,000. The following have been the Grand Regents elected since the first meeting: W. Z. Mitchell, 1881; Charles Mitchell, 1882; L. A. Gratz,a! ba = ~- = mer eee . Sa gone ae ae mee En ee eee Pee ee ee eee i Se Te ee wastes poy - - Bane eS Ps A ce SEN pa eee mn aR fa ik - yeeioe ee eee tee nae em . Pi pewempelin

i se Ne aed bn! ie waa} 1 ti) fd bias) ; {ent rae ; ae } ali s 1 ~ ry tai pity | baat HS) { ey ius thi lig b ane i} \ ‘ i} ipa? } py tae phone 1. Bi) bef : i Bhi aie it } ite sie e ati intr ah | ' * }) 1, ml \ { REY eile } ei if id { i i wat : i 1 ie : OnE f | tite { : i ; i 7 i pial : t 4 , ' f x eh! 4 y nt F Te ; t ey Sate EAL { : : : ' e i i i oe } ; 5 a : ; Ae Pini ; se el; ; 4 eo t } 5 ‘ aie weld | ay it i Nie meme eee eee! =. _F —— — . = = af } 324 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. David Wilson, 37 days, 310 miles, 4 fErriOs {. cee ce cciee es see cie De eRUO James White, 37 days, 370 miles, 4 ferries..--.-----++--++20ser-- 180 00 James Ford, 37 days, 420 miles, AFFETTICS cosas cic © einer: 135 00 William Cocke, 17 days, 100 miles, 2 PATTIES fo coitus ooo Joseph McMinn, 37 days, 170 miles, 2 ferries. ......+++-e+-+e+-e- 109 833 George Rutledge, 37 days, 240 miles, DerrieS. .. ccc ces ce ee L OGor Joseph Hardin, 37 days, 150 miles, 2 ferries........-.-++++ssee:- 107 60% Leroy Taylor, 39 days, 200 miles, 2 PETTICS. 6 coc co as tics ete LO OO John Tipton, 26 days, 918 miles, 2 ferries.......-+---+sseeeeeees 86 91% George Doherty, 37 days, 60 miles, D ferries) co. cc wie soso eee eee oO OOF Samuel Wear, 37 days, 60 miles, 2 ferries. ..-..+---+++++e+++ee+:: 98,663 Alexander Kelly, 30 days, 25 Til, Oliidaulsh ooo odppcbododondsc0 =U 66% John Baird, 81 days, 30 miles. ......-----++++-++0+> 4 eS DO H. Lacy, clerk, 20 days, (1OO:miles, 2 fLerrieS!.c <2 <-) ceces nte oreae 60 334 15+ Harle, clerk, 37 days, 150 miles, 2 fELTICS oie ee eee ] Legislature, the State agreed to subscribe stock to the amount of $650,000 in 5 per cent State bonds to be paid upon call pari passu with the payments of the individual stockholders. The financial embar- rassments of 1837 compelled a suspension, and the company was forced The State filed a bill enjoining the trustees from acting under the deed, and sought to execute a deed of trust, authorizing the sale of the road. to amend the charter. ‘The suit was carried to the supreme court and finally decided State. The debts amounted to about ? ‘> : cy $130,000, and the sum due from the State upward of $80,000, but by skillful management the debts were all compromised and liquidated by against the the creditors taking one-half of the debt in 5 per cent State bonds, and the remainder in the stock of the company at par. After various unsuc- cessful attempts to procure money to complete the road, the company ‘ r ‘ f ‘ > ‘9 eT ry YO ; 1 nap r ATT 51 finally made a contract with Gen. Duff Green, who agreed upon certain build the Dalton, Ga., to Green after doing a considerable amount of work failed and surrendered conditions to road from Knoxville. (ven his contract. The company then entered into a contract with William Grant & Co.. who finished the road from Dalton to the Hiwassee River. J. G. Dent & Co. built the road from there to Loudon in 1852, and in Through repeated failures, delays and litigations the name ‘“‘Hiwassee” became 1856 the portion from Loudon to Knoxville was completed. so obnoxious that in 1848 it was changed to East Tennessee & Georgia. In 1852 the East Tennessee & Virginia Railroad was chartered. The portion of this road in Tennessee extended from Knoxville to Bris- tol on the Virginia line, and formed a connecting link between the two great systems of roads those in the Northeast, and those of Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina. It was completed in 1858, and later was consolidated with the East Tennessee & Georgia, under the name of the East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia. | The first railroad chartered by the Legislature was the La Grange & The company was incorporated in December, 1835, and was Subscriptions to the amount of $250,000 were Memphis. soon after organized. made by individuals, and. in accordance with the act of 1835, the gov- ernor subscribed $125,000. on behalf of the State. The road was located in September following, and during 1837 the grading of the track was begun. Owing to financial embarrassments and inexperience on the part of the management, the work progressed slowly, and after dragging along for several years, was finally abandoned. February 2, 1846, a charter was granted to the Memphis & Charleston Railroad, authorizing a capital stock of $800,000, and under the persevering efforts of -Ex-Gev. wee STSa ET gg aN Sih en eS SRE, 2 ee ee ~ : %\ ‘ 7 RE) (i pa the Ae £) ia «Fee ' & fe he © 6 Bte oe i , cm . © fa L iy 4 § ’ ¥ Wy Ay : beep : A te reg 1 hae} 5 $ ~ e i | ‘ae 3 \ a A iia i t - if © ee Bet ea i. yee : ie i ie S i Pas ; * i ¢ _ mrp } ao yeas ‘ iy wid ' i} i q i ts B Rast a4 eka ‘a i gt | ery ; iy 4 | ea i al 3 ir od 5 ; ay}: | ak bARSIE ae a) Waal 5740 wees 1s { 2 ' t SEIT SSSA penaeae oe = Pees ame SAS ton ep epg em So ee. ey oe Pe! A a " -- nee SaaS Samat Sempaciaee aaa “Ty St ied =; 4 344 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. James C. Jones, the first president, Col. Sam Tate, Joseph Lenow, Minor Meriwether and others, was brought to a successful completion in 1857. In constructing the road the old road bed of the La Grange & Memphis was purchased and utilized. : The Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad was eonstructed simultaneous- ly with the building of the Memphis «& Charleston. This enterprise originated with Dr. James Overton, a man of remarkable sagacity and undaunted resolution. During a contest for legislative honors in 1843, he advocated the building of a road from Nashville to Chattanooga to eonnect with the Western Atlantic, a road chartered about ten years pre- vious to that time. He failed to enlist any considerable support in what was then looked upon as a visonary scheme, and on account of his en- thusiastic advocacy of the project, he was dubbed “old Chattanooga.” Although the efforts of Overton were barren of any immediate results, yet they served to direct public attention to the advantages of railroads. pout 1845 the depression which had prevailed so long in business cir- cles began to be relieved. The growing trade of Nashville demanded other outlets than that afforded by the Cumberland River. Other por- tions of the State began to awaken to the necessity of providing better means of transportation, and in this they were stimulated somewhat by the action of Georgia in chartering a road to run from Augusta to Chat- tanooga. The subject was brought before the Legislature, and under the pressure of influential citizens of Nashville, an act was passed December 11, 1845, to incorporate ‘a railroad from Nashville on the Cumberland River, to Chattanooga on the Tennessee River.” The internal improve- ment laws having been repealed, no State aid was granted to this road at that time, but an act passed by the next Legislature authorized the may- or and aldermen of Nashville to subscribe $500,000 to the enterprise. This measure met with considerable opposition, and a bill was filed in chancery to enjoin the subscription to the road or the issuing of bonds by the corporation. On appeal it was taken to the supreme court, and finally decided at the December term, 1848. The opinion delivered by Judge Turley decided that the Legislature of Tennessee had the consti- tutional power to authorize the corporation of Nashville to take stock in the Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad, and that the making of this road was a legitimate corporate purpose of the corporation, acting under the au- thority of the act; thus sustained by the court’s decision, the city voted the $500,000 to be expended in the construction of the road. During the two years previous the subject had been thoroughly canvassed through- out the city and a strong public sentiment had been enacted in favor of the enterprise. Most prominent among those to whom this result wasHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 345> due was Vernon K. Stevenson, and upon the organization of the compa- ny in 1848 he was elected its president, which position he held until the breaking out of the civil war. In addition to the amount obtained from the corporation of Nashville, he secured a subscription of an equal amount from Charleston, 8. C., $250,000 from the Georgia Railroad & Banking Company, and $30,000 from the corporation of Murfreesboro. which enabled him with the private subscriptions that were afterward re- ceived, and the aid which the State rendered by endorsing the company’s bonds, to enter upon the work of construction. The first passenger train oi the road was run out as far as Antioch, April 13, 1851, and the first through train ran into Chattanooga January 18, 1853. In 1869 the company leased the Nashville & North-Western Railroad for a term of six years, but before the lease expired, a two-thirds interest in the road was purchased from the commissioners appointed by the Legislature and the chancery court to sell delinquent railroads in the State, individ- uals in Tennessee and New York taking the other one-third. Subse- quently the directors of the Nashville & Chattanooga bought the one- third interest held by individuals, and that company now owns the en- tire road from Chattanooga to Hickman, Ky., together with its branches. The name of the consolidated road is the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis. The Nashville & North-Western was chartered as early as 1852, but subscriptions to it were secured with difficulty, and the work of construc- tion was not begun for several years. When the war opened only a lit- tle over thirty miles had been graded, and only that portion between Nashville and Kingston Springs was in operation. During the war the United States Government, for military purposes, built the road. to the Tennessee River at Johnsonville. At the close of hostilities application was made to the Legislature for the amount due the road under the then existing laws. This was granted, and the road was completed during the latter part of 1865. The Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railroad has several branches. The Winchester & Alabama, and the McMinnville & Manchester were both chartered in 1850, but neither was completed for several years. In 1872, upon their failure to pay the interest on the bonds issued by the State in aid of their construction, they were sold to the Memphis & Charleston Railroad. The Tennessee & Pacific, another branch, was projected to run from Nashville to Knoxville, but financial embarrassments checked its progress, and it was completed only to Lebanon, a distance of thirty-one miles. It was incorporated in 1866, and work of construc- tion was begun in 1869.ere ee ee ETE cask = a ‘ig ae a ate ich Daneel etal eebele~ Sy nel abe ee Se ina ~ eee tee mr eae oe rim? “eet iar ess 6 Se aga sa i ee 346 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. One of the largest corporations in the South at the present time is the Louisville, Nashville & Great Southern Railroad. The lines forming this system were built under separate charters, and afterward consoli- datede The road connecting Louisville and Nashville, which forms the main stem, was chartered in 1851, and was opened for business in 1859, the-first train through from Louisville having passed over the bridge into Nashville on September 28 of that year. The Memphis branch, extending from Bowling Green, Ky., to Memphis, embraces the Memphis & Ohio, and the Memphis, Clarksville & Louisville Railroads. The former was chartered February 4, 1852, under the name of the Nashville & Memphis Railroad. Two years later, by Legislative authority, the name was changed to the Memphis & Ohio, and in May, 1860, the road was completed from Memphis to Paris. In 1871, in order to prevent the sale of the road by the State the Louisville & Nashville Company loaned to the Memphis & Ohio State bonds sufficient to pay off its debt to the State, and the two roads were then consolidated. The Mem- phis, Clarksville & Louisville Railroad received its charter January 28, 1852, and the road was opened in September, 1861. July 1, 1865, the company having defaulted on the interest on the State bonds loaned to them, a receiver was appointed, and the road continued to be operated by receivers from that time until 1871, when it was purchased by the Louis- ville & Nashville Company for the sum of $1,700,000. The Edgefield & Kentucky Railroad, extending from Nashville to Guthrie, Ky.,; was chartered February 13, 1852, and finished in 1860. This road formed a part of the Evansville, Henderson & Nashville Road which was not entirely completed until 1872. The line was then consol- idated with the Nashville, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad into what was known as the St. Louis & Southeastern. In 1879 the Louisville & Nash- ville Company purchased the whole line, and it is now operated as the St. Louis division of that company’s system. Another important division is the Nashville & Decatur. This was formed in 1866 by the consolidation of the Tennessee & Alabama, the Tennessee & Alabama Central, and the Central Southern Roads. The Tennessee & Alabama was chartered in 1852 to run from Nashville by the way of Franklin to the Alabama State line, in the direction of Florence, but in 1858 the company asked authority to terminate the road at Mt. Pleasant, which request was granted. In 1853 the Central Southern Railroad Company was incorporated for the pur- pose of constructing a line from Columbia, Tenn., to the Alabama State line in the direction of Decatur. This line was completed November 20, 1860. May 4, 1871, the consolidated roads were leased by the Louis- ville & Nashville Railroad Company for a period of thirty years.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 347 The Mobile & Ohio Railroad extends from Mobile, Ala., to the Ohio River at Cairo, entering Tennessee from the south near Corinth, Miss. It was originally projected to strike some point on the Tennessee River. and run thence to the mouth of the Ohio. The company was organized in Alabama, and in 1848 received a charter from Tennessee. At the time of its inception this was the greatest railroad enterprise that had been inaugurated on either continent; and it was not until 1859, after many years of the most persistent effort, that the road was completed. During the war the road suffered greatly, and at the close of the conflict it was a splendid wreck. Sixty-five per cent of its original cost was lost; but by skillful and economical management, the road in a few years was put into a prosperous condition. The indebtedness to the State was paid off, and in 1870 the company resumed the payment of interest on all classes of its bonds. On January 29, 1858, the Tennessee Legislature authorized the Miss- issippi River Railroad to be constructed from Memphis to the Kentucky State line in the direction of Cairo. The work of grading was not com- menced until 1869, and was then soon after suspended. In 1871 it was consolidated with the Paducah & Gulf Railroad, a Kentucky corporation, under the name of the Memphis & Paducah. The whole line was after- ve, and reorganized as the Memphis, Paducah oO oD & Northern. It is now known as the Chesapeake, Ohio & Southwestern, ward sold under mortga extending from Cecilia, Ky., by way of Paducah to Memphis, a distance of about 345 miles. Another important road in West Tennessee forms a part of a great system extending from Chicago to New Orleans and known as the Chi- cago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad, the entire length of which is about 1,700 miles. The part in Tennessee was chartered as two separate companies, the Mississipp1 Central, and the New Orleans, Jackson & Northern. These roads were consolidated in November, 1877. Running arrangements were then made with the Lllinois Central Railroad Com- pany by which the entire system is practically placed under one manage- ment, though operated by two charters. One of the most important roads passing through Tennessee is the Cincinnati Southern, extending from Cincinnati to Chattanooga. The company was incorporated by the General Assembly of Ohio in 1869, and received a charter from the Legislature of Tennessee January 20, 1870. The road was completed and opened for business in 1880, and now forms a part of the system known as the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific. Several other roads besides those mentioned have been constructed and are now successfully operated, but the greater number of them are narrow gauge roads. or are of but limited extent. ——— a ene ep mete nO i ACERS "a = ae AN TAT ee = Se SS et —RRC fe: — \ j i, ; E 348 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 3 JFO9 ee : 2 The General Assembly, in March, 1555, passed an act for the regula- tion of railroad companies, to prevent unjust discrimination in tariffs and rates, and to this end -provided for the appointment of a railroad isist of three persons, one for each grand division of Lara ei ae commission to col the State. To this commission was given general supervision of all railroads in Tennessee, with power to revise all tariffs of*charges for ooo - : Se DEL Sok an oe eee * mgt Rsae : as, agape ara wr eee eee ele . ak = = Ss et i transportation, and to reduce the rate of charges if in any case they were found to be unjust or to discriminate against any person, corporation or locality. It was made the duty of the several companies operating rail- roads in the State to make annual returns of their business to the com- ae Oy ae naan F = READE 2 Stier ees Sin elanelliperentinniennn aan ae Missioners 1n such manner as the latter might prescribe. In April, 1883, the governor appointed John H. Savage, J. A. Tur- aE eeserenae le See en alms lev and G. W. Gordon as commissioners, who immediately qualified and entered upon the discharge of their official duties. Letters were ad- 5p ppenecoe So oar Sepa geentt pig a TO A mas ARES dressed to the representatives of the various railroads requesting them a —— Sanne * ‘ a at to make out and deliver to the commission for revision a schedule of the rates of charges for transportation. This several of the companies re- fused to do. and two of the leading roads obtained from John Baxter, United States Cireuit Judge, an order restraining the commissioners from interfering in any way with the tariffs of their roads. After the motion for an injunction was heard Judge Baxter pronounced certain Ss 7 sections of the act creating the commission unconstitutional, and granted SiN PITT EEA ALLA AL the injunctions. The eases were then appealed to the Federal Supreme EER Court, and were then pending when the Legislature of 1885 convened. Gov. Bates in his message advised that the commission bill of 1883 be not repealed, but that it be revised and made to conform to the eonstitu- Seda (oe dela So? eigen cys tion. The bill. however, had never been very popular, and it was re- pealed and the commission abolished. The following figures show the ext ee ee ee growth of railroads in Tennessee: In 1850 there was no road in opera- tion; from 1850 to 1860 1,253 miles of railroad were constructed; the ‘arabian ieee Tomsitn decade which follows shows an increase of only 239 miles, making a total in 1870 of 1,492 miles; in 1880 there were 1,872 miles of com- pleted road, with an assessed valuation of $16,375,894.50: The comp- troller’s report for 1885 places the whole number of miles of road at 9.094.5, with an assessed valuation of $34,350,170.84. The history of steam-boat navigation on the Western rivers dates back to 1812. In the winter of that year the steamer ‘“‘Orleans,” built at Pittsburgh, made the first trip from that city to New Orleans. The suc- cess of this venture revolutionized river navigation and efforts were at- once made to place steam-boats upon the Mississippi and all of its: navigable tributaries. The message of Willie Blount to the Legislaturead VHO Tlid Vio a \ ‘ uw HSOO0OH r x > vA — — G) * a | Z > P — = —q a — G 7. — Brank My Ried 125,276; William B: Bate, 132-201. Weds bue RENE Sy TON 8 Steerer ets wep st a a PEP ee - - ~ = ‘ ' Spee Sean Mayes = Se Opp ee 2 Ea Sane OSS Ii ae IEE te Pan — chanan, 636°. Bi 1 Also Jesse Wharton, 5,918; Robert C. Foster, 3,626, and Gen. Johnson, 2,417. 2 Houston’s majority ¢ a ’ ~ ‘ c Mm x) : ee 12,000. 3 Independent Democrat. 4 Independent Republican, 5 Greenback. 6 “Low Tax’’ Democrat, Pe) li bil 7 “State Credit” or “Sky-blue” Democrat. ' ; } : t } { iB ow i | } f A \ u h ¢HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The following table shows the total | . A ! 5 > total number and amount of bonds is- Ba) hi 1 2 ‘ 2 y ’ { ! vit syed by the State from 1832 to 1881, the rate of interest. and 4] iba} 0 . : Doe ca est, and the purpose mM ! for which they were issued. HMMA ati | ' ‘ } — = a yh ies Number.| Rate. Amount. | ale i | Union RAE Ol AUG MNESS Gus scccececcencccavcesscctccses ; s = = Hee | *Bank of Tennessee......... epee ee i stik eka Gee ees Cat ‘ OU 5 $500,000 00 1 Hib | } Nashville, Murfreesboro & Shelbyville Turnpike Company Messe uae cc Be ay ee 6 2,500,000 00 salt j VV cee eweeeceavewasasenassenssenncs 6; {7.1 2 en eee . iit 4 ) Gallatin Turnpike Company.........ssssssssecesersssccecsecsesenees ep iy 54 eee ie | CuCcececcee succcceccenceenusecscver Loz < 29 Ai i Chambers & Purdy Turnpike Company...............+.. 6 | (9 2,000 00 NH Franklin & Columbia Turnpike Company::..sc0 coe te ee Sean” ae ae oes 7,000 00 i Mi Columbia Central Turnpike Company..............00+- ee cee ae ane on 2 79,900 00 Mi Nashville & Charlotte Turnpike Company eT EG Ra Aan Lon ; 150,000 00 | Hi} ad Fayetteville & Shelbyville Turnpike Company........ ONE Rs eae yes el ae ve lee g0,0005 00 Ws i! Pelham & Jasper Turnpike Company............ eRe Ra TNE TE CE En ace ae ee a ie = 16,000 00 | i Columbia, Pulaski & Elkton Turnpike Gonipany ee, i perio ws * 5 Seon Clarksville & Russellville Turnpike Company Kn hee ee ee Oe ere a ies ; 127,600 00 Hl Het Forked Deer Turnpike Compapy.......... ee cee Ween Ee OS aeaie _. 5 37,500 00 "| Ii Heth Big Hatehie Turnpike C ODEON eset keene ence "ia Rae an ae Oe 2 7,000 00 I i Gallatin & Cumberland Turnpike Company.......ssccsssssesesseeccees De oe eae a . 14,000 00 ! i aie Nolensville Turnpike Company............... . OMEN Cee Tos Ht en ee 2 - 6,000 00 Aa | | Ashport Turnpike GOMPANYiccevcccsescoceseveusecen cases ERE Ge AT a ee fen eae a 2 49,000 00 Wa Fulton Tarnpike Company.......e.seseees tenn LR i Ie. ar ae ve - 25, H00) 00 | i Mabaniore SiS parta (urn pike COMPANY: cere/enccceseccneccsvesssereugensecronecectecrecernsseenucere 6 5 6,000 00 Wa ae Nashville & Kentucky Turnpike Company... - Rw one Th meee ae IE oY a 85,000 00 ene AR) st CentralSouthern Railroad Company............ ....++ URN Reha Ra Tanne Mae Ne 5 50,000 00 ite Memphis & Ohio Raitroad Company.. Men Ok SORE R n OeaP iee let aC : 596,000) 00 Mi Mississippi & Tennessee Railroad Company. .occs.scscseccssssssscssssoses secsessucereseucseconces "398 6 saaalgnatc | Winchester & Alabama Railroad Companyns.......s.ssscssssesssssssseeenssesressssesssceesesee oe 2 $98,000/00 ya Memphis, Clarksville & Louisville Railroad ¢ OM DAN VR ns ei a 1,289 6 1,289,000 00 aes Wa Edgefield & Kentucky Railro: EC COMPS Viewccssc ccs cee crac 3 rena A RAD Oar tec toe 2 1082, 0001.00 | vl I Rogersville & Jefferson Railroad Company. .....ccssssssssesesesees Groce ee ALS 8 1,180,000 00 id ih, Mobile & Ohio Railroad C Mite ee ee Seach tse SOK 38D 6 385,000 00 ital N . Knoxville & Kentuc ny Railroad Company...... Ree a oe Jelwueccesusbsceaasecears 1,296 i 6 1,296,000 00 4.) eg ola act aati: Gunberland Gap &C Nears Gane J Saaukbeteeks bead ceokae 2,350 6 2,350,000 0” | ta Knoxville & Charleston Railroad Company........--. sopeselapreesecereascarasly) 0 Siga a 90 4,373,000 00 Aloe hs) Nashiville & Northwestern Railroad Company .cac..:+:.c+scecaecasesessosaccoccceceseresoe seucce 2 a p ; 710,000 00 | ena Nethiville@ Chattanooga Railroad! Company. s-..sse+s-.su+severseresseoseseossceesatace cnnsssee: ane 7 : ees ee Me Tennessee & Pacific Railroad Company..... Sadana ee ee eet use Score 395 6 395,000 00 Hi aL HR Mississippi Central Railroad Company 8 a a ee nee fe 1,185,000 00 i! Southern Railroad Company (Southwestern)........ eS a Tea hae ae 5 es ee mae 0 1,124,000 00 | i East Tennessee & Western North Carolina Railroad Company eGR Ee, 400 . BOO | a RAAT ESraNTET Ovi Faeil [3-0 BN GON PAM Ve ooo a cok cs vesscchancsdcesouiee seusceas toes a 400,000 00 ie ayy \ Peauavilles Henderson @ Nashville Railroad C Sie savcpenchennceatcavssssvasncucvarecsns re 6 100,000 60 Nhe til Nashville & Decatur Railroad Company....... MC Ee Re ele ka a ie ae on N Win aoe Cincinnati & Charleston Railroad Comp: any i MCA ag | Semen Cete oO 2 350,000 00 | th hak KGADILOL DONS.» s..05-...2-0eseenenarcnasananessnnstceseaane nk es. 2 Ue ea eege ae alee Ste a Agricultural Bureau ONT beget or ee ee oN REE Dee ; B66 O° | i y i Murfreesboro & Manchester Turnpike C Dmpan ye en ee See a Ce pe 00 l tH Harpeth Turnpike C DU OADD eee eearncc een aos cocsecusscalsysicosaassovcusurnes ¢eazsta aX eee ae u8 4 iit Grenier indie StouelsiRiver'T einige Goumaaee pps go aaa cone eats ee 2 ae 000 a He a ge ee mabe ee es O7 o 0 ) Hi Lebanon & Nashville Turnpike Company. ...........:sccecesecesesereeesees cguauauesassessecstenes 81 ) 24 - 81,000 00 iat i) i Jefferson Turnpike CoMmpany.....ccrcsrsecvssessrsessceeserees le | Hi C arthage & Hartsville Tur npike C panane seoeicy yee ers do 5 45 000 00 Yodel i Hit Gari hapa & Romie Murupikel COmMpAany s..ccsccscnsos-sseseneconesesesscsessccvescceeetesseeneceeen a , De wy aa Hi } | Carthage, Alexander & Red Sulphur Turnpike Gainpang eet. ren a oe ‘ | oe Spe : Hi Dyersburg & Mississippi Turnpike Company ............++.+ Sets ont one RRR © a | 6 a AG Ha iI | Bristol & Kendrick’s Creek Turnpike C Gripen ean ane 25 6 25,000 00 | ; i Rogersville & Little War Gap Turnpike Company....csscssccrecccssscssssssscoveeseveessecees 20 6 20,0 10 OO HH Rit INA cP CHUM tran yiik Of Gori DATs eee ooo coos ocee cc cscksue set des dehcabssn Aoaulusonenses 7 : SO ao yi Jacksboro & Powell’s Valley Turnpike Company...... ne ak aC airs eo. i ; a ERNIGD | ‘ Hi Mulberry & Rogersville Turnpike Ginpanvc te ee i Ta a % Soa rd WW Mansker’s Creek & Springfield Turnpike Corp An yee ee en ees 10 6 10,000 00 : | I) i oct Ter “conaT i. i wa See lene . r ; tue { East Tennessee & Georgia Railroad Company........sscssecereccercersreseecsnsesssneccneranenss 1,614 : Fs 1,614,000 00 | i KK { LAV ASSEO UALINOAG COMPANY cccccunccccacasetussonctns-cseaccecasserasnpsscaceses 449 ‘5 449 000 00 . th ] \ Memphis & Charleston Railroad C OMPANY...esseeee ec eee Bae 1 700 6 1 700°000 00 | 4A Feast Tennessee & Virginia Railroad C Sipany ee ee er 2902 6 | 2'902'000 (0 : Pat | Louisville & Nashville Railroad Compamy.....sccccccessseccsecescneerescanenes peoneniceeanaiceeens 445 6 "445,01 10 00 i La Grange & Memphis Railroad Company...........-+e+ URE cgencnat elie uated ee saens Gose ck 200 | 1°24 217,250 00 | na McMinnville & Manchester Railroad Company..........0.......4 772 | ve ne 000 C0 : Hh Tennessee & Alabama Railroad Company....... Mica cea tet Lacs ea ACA ae { 173 6 1 173'000 00 11 STEMI Ae Si MRT ate ee CONG Fe bas aes castuasacccsettagesseantnageettscoe "8 & | * 48°000 00 Vai i ett AMI res SULIDITU SMA CEN OTR TEGEE Meee me Se, ccospacascssaversoonestdesesptntvlece eevee iL aoa | et | 4,941,000 0€ et Hi SE ea oe eee te. Bose sdescaph causes iventesi rete sport Weedlicasesboekes 6 4,941,000 00 eta tN He g bonds, act Ole LSGS ee eeecere ccececcroccctscscboecccesss sce Sicteupencrsvence 2.200 6 | 2,200,000 00 Li the New series funding bonds, act Of 187B.csccsss:-ssssssssssssssssssessesssceecsssnsssuessseceesesssees e657 | 6 | 6,641,000 00 aii . Ne apie ane age ray nee et ee 657 | 6 | 9, A a Rea! ea OO encase neh stasitonstoannsesacees sea sofeitarsstestsaes|) | 691 6 | 697,000 00 1 eae ee Bub ke A re Grand tOtal.......cccereceserscee soseeenneanensseesesersniensenseeeenenerstes 1$49,102,416.66 ) ae ae \ i seseseeseoees. saneeene se neesaucnensssessrensseessauaeencersrssess j\e49, LUZ, ° ; to ih / He aos * Only 1,090 of these bands were aeold: ae TS i : i i ' +R ejected i AN od iil at Hn aaa A a if i 4 ny FARR) es er } 1 Te ch mel Ny BB atten i i 4 4 aia rn ii re 1 ey 1a ’=a ae - a é: ee aT — = < ae "i - = A ; | x EPNQN OHH W on | dUulBl|Y BOarN HID 101N OM rr fOr OO IN Sia OOD LAA wmoOoC HOO Har HOROH 14 “UBOl qt So eatin AID MING 279030 SH Hib aM OT MIS 7d OR ITLANRNMOCSNINOS flee |e dude I | sea AS BRSSRG BER BSS+OSNS EM RSENS OAS SOL DD | ois] tamenerics ac : Ge erieegs SABSRSREAAR oS Se PORE SS a GPs — NO iD HOaANDTOLS ST ____ = | “puvjeads[p SSSHSSSises Pe OR RNS SSSSSsck — Soot 2¢ OPONSESSSBaA aOowoRd | ‘JVIDOME(] ar DONS PASboamckIagRaSayen = - are : = OO Meee NON iN | “*IOABO AA | : * a ___ (HoBqueory 2 ope i i | 2 Nive) ve > Soa) ry ' . - e re i ls : , | g “playaee — ses ie || eo "180 I 2 : SamBSses 7 |} % atjqnday : 2ast5Sses fi - : NiNINSEOAR 7 | . rmARN | ; : oF i “90008 A E 2 r= woo i On 09 1D ox I _ = REY pap omedy 5 O10 Ge = IBS eRASSANZESES oR eR _ SN peo ined SHAN OSROS 4 i | Bae : ANA AN ah ; sepia ios els "SOA DON MEM OOCSCNSO : br 3 | “UBO don siSurpetietinn’ QR ASPSRSRISSS ! ; “ dT[Guaadyy Sonn *AIID oo rt Ol HO HOD : eat I~ | . < . cm NO RE ONG OOK ett Oo eee : . ae Cc Sse mi | | —— : ae "UePIlI TN HIDID SANSS — 5 ; oh >On : SNOSMNAM NO GONS aif 1e.100 MI] 1m wo 07 PSSASASESE AE LS + : : ee sNIO OO ONO NA aos. rs 5 soo pe ee . s a eer ol aa Y ih { = . . sista oe = Hs : : = . mat JUvILH £O 0% oD arab OO HNO — ar he : ; ‘ 260 OM A IHESRQWHANOSORS mits 3% SOC REHICN 3p ARIS SRORDMD HD eh a | uvorqudey iON LASHSHABAANSOG Hi = : . ° mena aera eg feet I i at al re j A Alot es ® : ~ aaa Th ft MARE SONOS $s ay i : | Ad[I01r) GRBLELSISRSS £10 Ort SO OORDE A: es ae. a " . / “re ~eNDoOMoOH OM = =O 0010N "in 1D No Oo ree toe | Heh} PBLIOMO ra Srtk= 3x00 09 © HO a Sa Ki it | 4 ' : gat) 0 LD) TRH QawN Sth! i a : : or o i } DOAmM—- HOR wy meld auBIj | Sx sse Seamer re So SSeS ; i} . EAT idee SGESSSSaRSe 1S IFS IQRASSSNS2 1SRc eet res oa eee a Thee rt sre Shr ee ABM ONR OM NES yeh} L : . oot 1D OS 1 i Hi r Hm AID OF ee : me j : . =HADOE HOS: — (} INOWAIS FSRAHSHH OHH 2D 2 tk .ONDNMONDO = \ ih “7B.100TU9 ST reer sa Oe seesaal:s CN OO RR oN a Salas j Hie °d cls Sp ws esicslics) les lh : ‘ li aera s oS : 7s oy an Pe Ae. ae If sBlonod SQW OM AOORIO : 2 _* ___* i , SPOON TD Os et sy el loses iia if }B.10 aA) Sim! BR Blet Bie. : ono tHOSCHSH w Netea roma sejsnog sare ie SING Tt Renee ne iS i s ———————————— “aes : ss Ae ~ a if = HO Tes an . Seas —. © “1198 MONS ROSROS res :B! BF © ee Ty ee SS eS nS) Eats Oars ma am Oa | UvolloMy m DION EC) 1 800) 8) 18 6O Sao CER SSBaaEe SHORES — mf se Sings ee Cn OR eS eens Se OO Ree Se ee * : OOOO SSeS Sse si Sst os : PISS ie Co Re | aAanroanars : : : oe et -eSprrarspeig | | SSR RE SBENGS SOO See ONION — : » SN I~ RO NOF ¢ ort et © 2 ima a iD Oo —aAr SSO “‘1B1DOWI( - Qa : ih ite: sn 400 BOSNB Boas TOM IN OID Oe aaa e) \e : wate) 3 Nee ROmronocod SGU CR ADD UD eX — Se siete cs som Nf : ID 09 © mean Tean ace pie eee S : , — oD HO ID ) ——— x x rt (LOTTIE | | SEESSSSSE55 1 1 sR aes Ics : p ; BHANOM AQUA ; o> : mat oS NOAM NOrOon ~ - S Sa Ps r Hata ole) GiGe SiS PRA Aon ial smog OT 73 || Dioner 2 7 : rn Veh ar Om MODOC :Ooto —* Al ; soos Pee : re SON ra 00 ISNOMSO ‘uBbdeyong | FAB IO 2S raw Ss : MOONO 2 INH : u naonmrE-~< - : 2 <> Ce © 2-0 OD 3: OF ns en coO kt tim if — = “‘ye1oomlsad | COON H tre ne qo nk SRBAHDKMAS ip odo —— ce ; . . A DOmbxmNOoOES tO NO O ; ees fe incite etn SBR a5 ‘1000 | AOA OID : : ie atl a | } > | —=10 Oe she CMO) * “ISO Ga — * 7] A SHHID : . sto et OE: DOoOOoOMmAS - = Dy “BIW AA | wae ee IN S fe Hines cote SSR onas Ir ROS 1 | ———_—_——— | ; s COQ aie mAInmoOr Shere HIr~ mo = ORES . ‘ : iz i ol r :- Nr oO ~ rm oO . ry 7 . | -goxarg | raion oes 7c Ns Dio a I~ * : | "48.100TU9 ae Nr Ore * 2 ON =: SOT 00 ES een ates en Sirs = qd | > etQ smi > SO rt COMMS tH - :DOnOR is : : SHOSASHREAISA : Sit ocnigs Sra wis 7 mvisaelite : ee a foe ws :OM ODO -ropdey, | SRS SS SE SSS | Ss — : : z I Bien SRAROCOSOLR OSH 2] 1ON 2 TOMS — a : oo | “SIT AA | MOOI Omar 2 ie sir=tiON 5 LDHMOREDOVAWS : = — ue 1iY) | rr of 2: OP BO ri BIO BS 3 112 SMM NODOD SS | BCE! ol ae : 2 EN > 09.69 CUir4 60 2 2S Onmwmowesd OOP SOO a, 8 “OOMNS< e . LON © Aje 00D 6 «mS INOW l —_ ae : : 2 a NOMAOION 3 193) St RaNIES t00 R SID OONkm Ow ‘ . . re me ad etett te ISO NOWNH SIBADAONEOORD 2: — ; eos s ABTO BS SNS 62 19 00 < 22 sho "oO a + : wie : = ~ Sry AA Seaabaneel ia ok: fae SeSaSsee is is = Eee Soba cb Ste ieee ty GaN MIO [OUST -BS 1S AU eee oo ° so reiy ty rm MMOAS ! 2:6 Ou Tn vest | Son Ra wOONS —————— sas : Se Sra Siok ram N ‘yjog | SRBSR! Ei: — hos d|SS3SSR28RER8 ois COs ICO SOI — Bette JeIOOMI(T so OOO F= iO 4 AS pe SISO si USI Nie Coleen ae a oe Ss srt BSN Syme eon orepicoiesinc 2: im se a0 0 x —— { = A 2s * Sia eieedi le A rt xi mt 09 10 ° acs P= OS DN a = 7 ss eo) 8 * Oe . aa wo . : =~ AO =. S “MOST <0 00 'O2 1 00 = rn — out : a = . or oe = 3S | II’ }T CU CS O2 S100 oO f set ore on — ean — 7 : : et oS | Sa ea a 220 set 3 o> : COSHASOA Se HA | — r— oi leicet Siae re sign) KEG AES! 7O ONDE OND : = hee ois 7 . cio s SS ealceienatcxteaies 2 3 sO ENS ESO euiO : Ol rm | iReesex situs uate = et eee BODD DA IAS A using UtA See iStiaves oamalOS IOS oes e 3° ° raf Soe ee | —MADE® Biel eisat sl fe] chee ce ee sas : ‘ ‘4B.100T19Q] | 1 oS A ji) Oo oie & OADM ONDS ¢ : Se : } Be Soi ane * of cei ei GN! SSseosszse : 2a [Om OFON : — (4 | Sea ———————o : Se . reel ett fe oa COE SLGS is : 2 :S Rie rE ES : = : “|| ‘ony M | NSSRe cRaIGN opal ENS : air cy : >NIONOO : 6 } © *§ aN ere ar pees (etter) she 2 So CRs ote sane : > I ” ND ad face -N «OS . * -m oc = - alane . Il % |- EXCANS | alice ches coy io i i ie SSeSSSSsg i ik: : z | eee Rceedessel, s gx | oIng ue A Dp ss 10 3 : ir a —s . oieliis : : ? RS IN i (nl A a 2 «9 : 4 re ahi wi PRE @ EE eT eA MYG ae I B1ID0 Ort rm: om : 3: : 71D -¢ a : cect es ese eee ; iis . . Se ; o> * eH Cid a > oO a ef — . : « ; . = * . ° CO 2 Oma ° 5 1n ~~ keg | SS: THO: siopel. aes : ote ratrikS 4 25 e ‘ _ . rs ~— : oiguie : ~J oy ‘3 ° os 7 of a == eS MN <3 cote ee TM : 2 2:2: 1NOS AAO sae et H 2 aA "ons a vi ia. 2s 2m se . iN : : t= = tO = : H wosysoue | SS rise : ESQ ONO: Moe : a nN : N “qe.100TIOqd CI Fen er Cfo) te CO) SH siC3 eOOk BS 8 Bh sel hm EO COSIO Ona OuTE : : } oN Nes Se ig OL ¥ cae a opie . Si00) Sinan HOON : ; ~ To RT EaA S8ape Sf SoLt 28 :8356 iho bss i area Reet ag = oo se oSn hss wats me wes ; OO PLSsegs A so A FSQrAzE aS ri PORE SMMED 4o- eA Sans -— O oad amnmmsn >: BAD S See SCL U SSeS gS sag sverlenasag Cred pay | eed - a val os ant Ore - ry . > me . » t 5 : Sgunesebecele Sos icersées = TEeEER SE Gece OOTLOAA mS DO RINT SSS AAS SES oa aE eh Fe OG esd ng ge Pa > liad | — | (358) SEER SRS= SSc ino i 179 16 3481 34 87 254 736 24 36 403 1807) 1092 4361| co OD OD = =_ oof NON 3A4) 1703} 717} 3672) 283 780) 205} 2929] a No Ont or Nn _t- ck arc Ne 1S "“—O©o [AD :coO oO © | nN roo « OO “irs __ oP) “O10 sm OO 510 rt 1m HO . N oO meat oo «iO aimTN . 2 m 2c > «mh mo sO KEN) ORcesncw ec usces PAMOS:c2ccecccess|acee Jefferson.........| Johnson.,....... } 5 8 1330 t 12 810 5248 611 64 949 100 166 13 199] 367) 1488) 953| 209 2780) 487) 1293 36) 619] 2393 Cc 14 ~-oOoMmotwoNaArE co SONS NANA S33 weir Oo mS Om re N ated m=mMOODOOO SG Soomro. coo Hom ON CHD No rin N 1| 94! 37 LOZ reece: 28 971 362).. 886 328 | | } 00} 3652) 37| 1147 3 3119) 3 c 9) 53 682 267 12} 598} 1007) 1264 3 A eo aeee 79 DOE 4020 603 394 239) 34 473 € « € « 99% 438| 133) 2718 7 4 33) 4| 1 ctaeeeree 558) 3 174 seeeeeeee 45 8 293) 270) 58 a 498) nn 172 681 140 859) 395 « c 2551 67 178 838 830 see eeeses 277 eeeeeeretlans 279 596| | 74! 544! 2 286) 439) ~ ee ee aeserleeeeeenee 211 547| 31 Se eeeees ee erseees | seeeseees ~~ ov 1 8 31] . see eeeses | eeeeeeere ) Zt eeereceee 52 io . ~ . - . * . ~ . + ~ - . seeeeues [Ssscccce N 1m rm «fr N 3 wt “rma 1 2 “ 63 22| TEOUG OM: cecoccceclacnccaces|ec : BTV cscesn es bincodlnie...c...c| NMGNTINM. ..se--s. WACOM i cscus: sss. MadiSOn....core ATION serccccsscs Lauderdale..... Lawrence. oe WOW sno. cn cwelcaeocacss| ceases [iA Oxsccssesaceucs Men M I 1035| 3048 1475| 612 538| eseeeceee ‘ 1d 188 744 618 786 517 1é 921 2114 606 48 r 159 164 2044| 729) 895) 1477 a 199 i 1824! 742 533) 260 621} ] 628 380 ) SO 2 o 1738 ] 302 748 93 1160 6} 99 4 49 10 10 ) 99) 537 728) * 5 589 222! 340 | | * DeChrerrrare a ° — _ ® a . . oO = ro) Oo — = ~ ~- Marshall......... MIQUE. ccccusssss NOnNTOCh cccccess Montgomery... TIMOOLR) ccc-censes|acccasess Morgan. ......... Perry M Pb sc ccssvec| ceeceuscc|cccss- Pickett. le Polke... "OHO Rien aa -nN0 = © sO ID 200 fF Sm Ss te 7 rt site Si mie OAAMODONOAR -HKHnNONM i I~ 00 OHONDWAHRHHMHM I MMOMA oo PHRrONWDMOr-MAS iHiOtN = AQ NN N : AOMHOCORHS DAN OO OMA MHOCOOM IHDOOSO oO Neth OrMCMOM DO INQ ri © oo See NNO FAN Ae rm NO MWHOOEOMNE NORD HOD HODMHO GCHEN HOMOrORNAES een rm ro N N . DROHAARRHROSO HORE or MOOMrO ORF OnN FN © Orns AHO SwWRK DOMND INMOD oso) mam 7 NM FN ts Ne : AtOreOonornst tener 0 COTO NHR NWO ORD INOr io oO AMHOWOrNAOS !Nnne Na eae re ON MN . ADOORHDADSCHS HHS 7 HDOREAMNOEH HHH AAMONHHAHAOR THESES N° An Ni: oe DPOMARDODHOMO -ONDN : i= DADOMOONNOM -oras 2 00 AWOANHRAMDEO is Ar :— re re me . . rHONEOM HaoWHWo re: OMDO MORO INMOH IH N MOO HO: ew : : mt : . . MHI AOMMONIO ~ONOR 10 : HHNANOAMOCWOH HOM 26 : rio * : re ° : OMOMONHOMWO :ODOHas 1O THRODSS DOOMRAOMOHAN (ODER FH IDSOSOHO AHOMWMHOMPHAM IHOMM IM INMBMUS _ a co ri . . eee DNOOOCErORHOAN -DOFS 6) SOAS =~AMOWMWNMARTH THOMA EN OHMS THHHOMMOErOOO INDHH 10 IMBHHO Looe re mr. 6S a ° me SCAAMKMIODOINED -NNAN IN 13908 SMO ONWHWMADOHO 1DHANDS 316 IHAD AMPiIOMWOMHAOMD 1H OMMM im MOS _ _ roo . . ee PinoOnmOoMmmOnsH 1S "OOO ONAN O Hr NOD tet ee PHAN OO SHrOADADORA IN r= ORS CRmoOoMne sOMmDwo IN OSM ANMADON THOMA IRE TONKS —-~AoOn oF [NHM IN IMOOH 4 mo re ° . . — ANOCANED INWMAH co : Santos squet toe -r : OAM HOR INOSSCM it : ae : re , ; SODONDO -Orr “t= :c MOrimow «-nwoeo 7 3 MORON NOH 1 IO IN re ei 2 F : DOtOn EEN: : ox SreMOO OOM: : tal HFRHOARM imtae:! 0 rir : vad) oes : ASM rANOH SSO IN ANDOrm Ham K FO 3 NAON INAWE IN ING ry eed a - : OOO NOON 20. 20 ONDA omddtre 20 2 MOSS I NoOnrwo ist 20 eo re . mn . . rOnm sR Onm 10 I AeA te OAD 2 = Hrd mrt sNN Oh ie IN a is : : “OID DOO -FtROO OH IMHO OW COO ENON -OMm Od +0 +O ior S190 LOI AE HOMO $60 20910 Ox ° eN ° ; : 4 "He (OM MD OKO tH OND Syt0O tet >OO1IN (= Oor "SN INROR f ANS tN OO rt Ts anes . . Lm, SO ,~-OCOr- IMOrS DOORS Im -DOCOSO : OwnN ‘Oro ma tO NS CC rt iO et . rt © = | . . rm Qi itn 2m ‘ : Oe ; 719 6 © « oreo ® : am soo *O iam 10 0 ICS +> © IM10 2D Net oO > 2 +O 12 N OM 30 2:0Or ire HRS a * a ° | | sesenecese| SHEN sr ceroscerd IVAN c... COGDsdcscecccecessslsccccevee Sequatch evier... shelDw--:-----580) WNC ecscussce ull SLOWALT. coscecce: Rutherford..... S h 5 Ss S oc Cc tk rm w mS < Oo x Or — nN wH Hine Ne Oy 7 6 . +f S ; ag . Re) ra H : > @ Ay 2 2” 2.9 He 1140). 480 ean |eeweeenes *Q e Oe ba 760) 1 1088 Beers ington... 1col... ashi ¢ Un Lb thorns eae toe Van Bure WwW Wayne... t 7 rklew..-..... ¢ c We 24090) 39)12 a D ——— * s 16OL6| 1382 LC 1/107677 Y a See leecliemet aed. 66/128] 95 8 3166 655)13:% ») 83 re formed 94391 17 565 OAe2 )I00 30 113 oupbties from which they we 69176} Q) 7 | L880 with the ¢ = oat =H oO nv 1883 9517 3 JO 798 C J PYG 198¢ s) 59 8 104 2017 2550 750 1491 1610 100} 402 653 5 114 686 515 oeere Williamson White .... Wilson oted in 1 j not reported counties Three ee — — eh i Sa ne : Bigs ne oepas icra sag Pe PTE Rs ee x r = egg 3 Z wee - iy rence aetna tee cn a ete As ten ce s : aan ea ae ; = = : Ree San ie aie tsa Se ~ . Tae Deen moe ee - , ( eno = = ee = = apelin . -— me —S a ! Se a iS See See Peat oa - asin : ETA, ae aaa et ae Spee ee eee ae te Se ee ee aces lt geese matte = om SERS Tag te mip aN FE free ir i EY wpicet cde Sapa aa a RE PIE LN od creme eA SS fae : z aE — : - ae : = = adapewmem > Es ——— - etpl-cloee : ee 5 a AES = : Sores eure em : 3 " oe ee mg crates ae COUNTIES. PAN OTSOT rece crkccccscecccs| =< Bedford 8242 | 16012 Ree enn, cote bwsave lee Looe penn Dee coc u cucccticssest ues [woes ce 3050 | 5005 | 4648 Bleds0.......:+0ecereeeerere eres: res scree eos 11258 | 11028 BOUT ovis ccccocctccccecsccccssn oscer D87 | 8309 | Pel aera eee eels ee 2668 | 4224 | 5110 CANTTION,......+reseseeeseeeresesern|ssessrreres le Saar me | asia |) a190| 4835,| eats CHEATER Te aeepenocoonuocnanonecd edocaDToocuy poococKeec GT CSLOLE ere reese cccceee cde cn| cowesenesnan|secusennecs fier a Gccosceevncs|eccceee esee|setee cores CREA TOTTI el etrceserst l cocenstesees 4798 | 5508 8470 Ol ype oes enccccasccuaasss seneese|sccecerccces|ssoacs varase] sects soreee|seeee steseee|sereeeneeees Cacke We reccteccececeses tcc|pcocneseesss|anecsn encase | 5154} 4892 6017 OTC cece cet ekcccs|nccuvacentus|Zcucsbevsass |-seesessecns|seecencesees|tanaeaeneers COTO Cb bi ocooorrwencncsccsacceves|sccccegveces|scccanrsencs |.cecccene en | GU MPCL AN iccccccecccececcescss|-cccpsvescns|or coe resco |scoveveesses ecoeccs rece |ees sneer es WD SVIGSOM cose ecece nce ceceess 9965 | 15608 | 20154 | 28122 DCCA Ticsccoctcccscesecscscese : DeiGal Dickecccsccckcccecescsxess Prete | cece necets | (ececentence|acanescotscs| en seac ones. Deron Wicagahccstecnecerrs one pen Nccacees| ens | 4516 | 5190 7265 Dy Sree ai eae | heen eseeereeee leccenneece | sconneceesec 1904 | FAYVECLtE ..ccscceereeesecceensctenss|ernesecerens|ecennacanens I aeeceeeeeees|steneeenenes 8652 FODLIESS . ..cecennencccsvevececces| cssccncceres|sevcsgonerss|seeseenecsss| 1870 Jackson and Overton CoS8.......sssssscsevesseees Henry Clay. Tak@sscsccccecccnsscesy-ce ~---t-| 1870 Obion CO ciccececccsundendeccectecacascactucdacheceseeean: For Obion Lake. WOUGON cscccxccccccsasoccccsece 1870 toane, Monroe and Blount Cos. Fort Loudon. TIOUSLOD Gcccsscccecesssevcets: | 1871 Dickson, Humphreys, Stewart and Mont-| Gen. Sam Houston. ZOMCTY COS... ccc seeerecsoeccesecercevececcrrnvessenes A) AN CNacecarccchavecesesnescsseas 1871 Hamilton and Bradley ‘Cos... senate Jesse J. James. MOLE w...ceeeeeeennernreeeneeeee | 1872 Lincoln and Franklin CoS...........ccsecsseeees UDICO] 0.000 c.seeceseoe renee | - 1875 Washington and Carter COS.....-...ssseeeee- .| } Bick etter ccvcrs ti eices oe 0tes | 1879 Overton and Fentress COS. r.ecescsecceee vncees 1 hi CHEStED .....0:0e seeeeseeseeeee| 1879 | Madison, Henderson, McNairy and Har- a _deman COSissrscecsccesavscccecpaccsctacssie, elena pees Na 2a aay Del RES a lg EE AR age ite en Se ee Sine Beene tiga — oa a =F Cee en eee eee HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 364 single justice. This court was composed of all the magistrates within its jurisdiction, all of whom sat together, sufficient number to transact business. ses brought for debt of £5 or under, and could but any three of whom were a A single justice had original jurisdiction to hear all ca also try all misdemeanor cases coming under the jurisdiction of the court of pleas and quarter sesslons. Superior courts were established by the General Assembly of North Carolina in 1767. They were composed of three judges, two of whom were sufficient to hold court. They had orig- ases brought for debts of £100 or more, where inal jurisdiction in ¢c If the parties lived the parties to the suit lived in the same district. in different districts the limit was placed at £50. ‘These courts also had original jurisdiction over all crimes of a serious nature, and appellate jurisdiction in all cases from the courts of pleas and quarter sessions. The first court of pleas and quarter sessions in Washington County met in February, 1778. The following extract is from the journal of that court at its first session, Washington County, February 23. ‘ Court Journal: Ata court begun and held for the county of Washington, February 23, 1778; Present, John Carter, chairman; John Sevier, Jacob Womack, Robert Lucas, Andrew Greer, John Shelby, George Russell, William Bean, Zachariah Isbell, John McNabb, Thomas Houghton, William Clark, John McMahan, Benjamin Gist, John Chisholm, Joseph Willson, William Cobb, James Stuart, Michael Woods, Richard White, amin Willson, James Robertson and Valentine Sevier, Esquires. On Tuesday, next day, John Sevier was chosen clerk of the county; Valen- tine Sevier, sheriff; James Stuart, surveyor, John Carter, entry taker; John McMahan, register; Jacob Womack, stray master, and John McNabb, coroner. William Cocke, by W. Avery, moved to be admitted clerk of Washington County, which motion was rejected by the court, knowing that John Sevier 1s entitled to the office. The following extracts w the prompt and vigorous manner in which this court dis- Ben] serve to sho pensed justice: ; THE STATE, ) V8. } In ToryisM. It is the opinion of the court that the with Great Britain, and the sheriff take the whole of his estate be valued by a jury at the next court, one-half of said estate to be kept by said she for the use of the State, and the other half to be remitted to the family of defendant. The following also appears upon the records of the Washington County Court: On motion of E. Dunlap, State’s attorney, that J. H., for his ill practices in harboring and abetting disorderly persons who are prejudicial, and inimical to the common Cause ot liberty, and frequently disturbing our tranquility in general, be imprisoned for a term of defendant be imprisoned during the present war into custody, which must riffHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 365 one year. ‘The court, duly considering the allegations alleged and objected against the said J. H., are of opinion that for his disorderly practices as aforesaid, from time to time, and to prevent the further and future practice of the same pernicious nature, do order him to be imprisoned for the term of one year, and is, accordingly, ordered into the cus- tody of the sheriff. On motion of E. Dunlap, Esq., that a sum of money of £1,500 cur- rent money due from R. C. to said J. H. for two negroes, be retained in the hands of said R. C., as there is sufficient reason to believe that the said J. H.’s estate will be confiscated to the use of the State for his misdemeanors, ete. The court. considering the case, are of opinion that the said moneys ought to be retained. On motion that commissioners ought to be appointed to take into possession such property as shall be confiscated. The on taking the same under consideration, do nominate and appoint John Sevier Walton and Zachariah Isbell, Esqs., for the aforesaid purpose. court, , Jesse In some instances the action of these courts may have assumed or encroached upon the legislative prerogative, but these were stormy times and rigorous and energetic measures were necessary. In 1782 the dis- trict of Salisbury was divided, and the district of Morgan, which in- al ra e i“ * ° f i . ~~ eluded Washington and Sullivan Counties, was established. Section 5 of the act creating the district is as follows: AND WHEREAS, The extensive mountains that lie desolate between the inhabited parts of Washington and the inhabited parts of Berke Counties make the transportation of criminals from the former to the latter difficult, and on the way many frequently find means to break custody and escape; Wherefore, that offenders in said counties of Wash- ington and Sullivan may be more easily and certainly brought to justice, Be zt enacted by the authority aforesaid, that one of the judges of the superior court and some other gentleman commissioned for the purpose, or one of them, twice in every year at the court house in Washington County, sit and hold a court of oyer and terminer and general gaol delivery for the trial of all criminal cases whatsoever within the limits of the courts of Washington and Sullivan Counties, one session thereof beginning on the 15th day of February, and the other on the 15th day of August, and every session shall be continued by adjournment for five days exclusive of Sunday, uniess the business shall be sooner fin- ished, and said court shall.possess and exercise as full and ample power and authority in all criminal matters within the limits aforesaid as the judges of the superior court of law possess and exercise in other districts, and shall also have power to receive and try appeals from the county courts of Washington and Sullivan Counties. The first session of this court was begun and held on August 15, 1782, the Hon. Spruce McCay, presiding. Waightstill Avery, was ap- pointed attorney for the State, and John Sevier, clerk. How long this court continued is not definitely known, but if it continued until the establishment of a superior court in Washington District, it failed to ac- complish the purpose for which it was created. In writing of this period, Ramsey, who followed Haywood, says that violations of law were permitted to pass unpunished, except by the summary process of the regulators appointed for that purpose by the people themselves, and this is assigned as one of the causes for the organization of the State of Franklin. It is certain that soon after that act of the colonies had taken place, the Gen- eral Assembly of North Carolina taking notice of the disaffection existing in the western counties passed an act organizing the counties of Wash- ington, Sullivan, Davidson, and Greene into a judicial district, and ap- 23 Soran Se ner — = pyrene es Senate a a Stee oes eer nee ae —— = arse ee. eaeae SS ———————— — Caan ae a eS <2 oF Mis. aes aa s = i. Sa = cg A Sas re sani i an am Se ae ks pipe Aes - - nies es aed —< —es a m Fine 2 ee . ri ~ Me ste Seed ae 2 eee ea = : io RES cae cratpk teens ee ocd uae — ee soe et — eee os he Se ph Chae a a a a a a a 2 eapenapeeeeentieamsempramanet soot toa len ta = oy saa tray - Pre en egy mperetine 2 me ee a ciaaligsh 4 ; ge a ie ne a 2 CE a PO \ Na rea aaa emanate tiie tiem een eee eee omen eee “ bd 3 > ye == 366 HISPORY OF TENNESSEE. pointed an assistant judge and an attorney-general for the Superior Court, which was directed to’ be held at Jonesboro. This with the other acts passed for the redress of thei’ orievances were not sufficient to restore c we 7 < : ‘ he disaffected colonists, and one of the first acts passed by eonfidence to t ma ee yn for the State of Franklin established a judicial the Legislature chose system. David Campbell was e osha Gist and John Anderson, assistant judges. Soon after Gov. proclamation, announ¢ed the appointment of F. A. Ramsey, lected judge of the superior court and Sevier, by Hisq., as clerk of the superior eourt. Lh County courts were also established, and justices of the peace appointed. The salary of the judge of the su- Lat £150 per annum, and that of the assistant judges perior court was fixec Bv the early part of 1786 these courts were all or- £95 for each court. canized. At the same time commissions had been sent to, and accepted er several in Washington, Sullivan, and Hawkins counties as justices of fie peace, under the authority of North Carolina, and by them courts were held and law administered as though the State of Franklin did not exist. In Greene County, and the new counties below it, men could not be found willing to accept the offered commissions.* Then the authority of Franklin was supreme and no conflict of jurisdiction occurred. It was very different elsewhere, and especially in Washington County, when those who adhered to the eovernment of North Carolina were nearly, if not quite equal in numbers to the friends of the new State. Col. John Tipton refused obedience to the new government, and under the authority of North Caro- lina held courts at Davis’, ten miles above Jonesboro, on Buffalo Creek. Both superior and county courts were also held in Jonesboro by the judges commissioned by the State of Franklin. As the process of these courts fre- quently required the sheriffs to pass within the jurisdiction of each other, in the discharge of their official duties. collisions were sure to occur. But they did not confine themselves to these casual encounters. Whilst a county court was sitting at Jonesboro, for the county of Washington, Col. Tip- ton with a party of men entered the court house, took away the papers from the clerk and turned the justices out of court. Not long after a party of adherents to the new government went to the house where a county court was sitting under the authority of North Carolina and took away the clerk’s papers, and turned the court out of doors.t The like acts were several times repeated during the existence of the Franklin government. Frequently records were taken and retaken several times, and in that way many valuable papers were lost, causing much annoy- ance and loss to persons interested ii them. In 1788 the government of Franklin came to an end and the au- thority of North Carolina was again undisputed. In May of that year “Ramsey. tHay wood.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 367 courts under the authority of that State were held in Greeneville without interruption, and Andrew Jackson, John McNairy, David Allison, Archi- bald Roane and Joseph Hamilton, who were licensed by North Carolina, were admitted as attorneys. The General Assembly of the previous year had elected David Campbell, a former adherent of Frankl of the superior court for the district of Washington. Whilst this conflict between the State of Franklin and Nortl in, to be judge 1 Carolina was going on, the people of the Cumberland settlement remained undis- turbed in their loyalty to the latter government. _In 1783 the countv of Davidson was organized and provision was made for the establishment of a court of pleas and quarter sessions. The governor of North Carolina commissioned Anthony Bledsoe, Daniel Smith. James Robertson. Thom- as Mulloy, Isaac Bledsoe, Samuel Barton. Francis Prince and Isaae The four last mentioned ac- 1783. and qualified in the fol- lowing manner: ‘The next junior to the senior member present men- 5 | Lindsey as justices to organize tle court. cordingly met at Nashville October 6. tioned in the commission administered the oath of office prescribed for the qualification of public officers to the senior member. and then he to the others present.””’ The remainder of the Justices appeared and quali- fied at the next term of the court. Two years later an act was passed es- tablishing a superior court of law and equity for the county of Davidson to be held twice in each year and to have exclusive jurisdiction west of the Cumberland Mountains. The first session of this court was to have been held on the first Monday in May, 1786, but a young man only twenty-four years of age was appointed to be judge, who upon more ma- ture reflection becoming fearful that his small experience and stock of le- gal acquirements were inadequate to the performance of those great du- ties which the oftice devolved upon him, chose rather to resign than to risk the injustice to suitors which others of better qualification might certainly avoid.* This delayed the organization of the court, and it was not until November, 1788. that Judge MeNairy, who was appointed to fill > the vacancy, arrived in Nashyille. The following is the first entry in the journal of the supreme court: North Carolina—At a superior court of law and equity begun and held for the coun- ties Davidson and Sumner, at the court house in Nashville, on the first Monday in Novem- ber, 1788. Present, the Honorable John McNairy, judge. Proclamation was made com- manding silence under pain of imprisonment, while the judge proceeded in the public business, The Court then appointed John McCay, clerk and Andrew Jackson, . : ? ” 2 - me ~ an ry a attorneys in behalf of the State for that term. During this year Tennes- * “ * ‘2 . ™ ~ ¥ ¢ see County was created and with Davidson and Sumner Counties were «Haywood. Se aee a . > : 2 — = Sees =— ecwiee epee Bs I~ OT PRCT ATS 368 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Mero,* at the same time the jurisdiction organized into the district of hat enlarged, and the salary of the judge of the superior court was somew increased. A somewhat pe was made by the General Assembly of North Carolina in 1786. An act was passed making +t unlawful for either the plaintiff or defendant to em- re than one attorney “‘to speak to any suit in court.” It also ful for any plaintiff or defendant to enter his own plea or de- encourage this practice, it was provided that culiar and yet wholesome regulation of legal practice ploy mo made it law fend his own cause, and, to ‘no instrument of writing which contained the substance should be lost or destroyed for want of form, any law to the contrary notwithstanding.” A scale of attorneys fees in various cases was fixed by this act and any attorney convicted of taking more or greater fees*than those established by law was suspended from practice for a term of one year. Upon the organization of the Territory of the United States of Amer- ica south of the River Ohio, no material change was made in the courts. Those holding office under the authority of North Carolina generally continued to serve in the same capacity under the Territorial Govern- ment, though a new constitution and a new oath of office were required. The two judges of the superior court, David Campbell and John McNairy, were re-appointed by the President. Joseph Anderson was added as the third judge required by the ordinance establishing the Territory. That ordinance also provided that previous to the organization of the Legisla- tive Assembly, the three judges of the superior court, or two of them, should be associated with the governor in administering both the legis- lative and executive departments of the government. Judges Campbell and Anderson seem to have been the only ones who served in this capac- ity, Judge McNairy’s name not appearing In any of their proceedings. The Territorial Assembly, soon after its organization in 1794, passed an act establishing courts, but 1t was little more than a confirmation of those already in existence, with the exception that provision was made for the appointment of a State’s attorney in each county. No change was made in the judges, and they continued to hold their office until the admission of Tennessee as a State, 1796. The constitution adopted in that year did not establish any courts, but left the matter entirely to the Leg- islature. The following is the article relating to the judiciary : ARTICLE VY. j SroTion 1. The judicial power of the State shall be vested in such superior and in ferior courts of law and equity as the Legislature shall from time to time direct and estab lish. _ *This district, for some reason not satisfactorily known. was named for a Spanish officer residing in the “ Mississippi Country,” with whom the Cumberland settlements had some sort of dealings and disagreements.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 369 Src. 2. The General Assembly shall by joint ballot of both houses appoint judges of the several courts of law and equity, also an attorney or attorneys for the State who shall hold their respective offices during good behavior. Src, 3. The judges of the superior courts shall at stated times receive a compensa- tion for their services to be ascertained by law, but shall not be allowed any fees of office, nor shall they hold any other office of trust or profit under this State, or the United States. Src. 4. The judges of the superior courts shall be justices of oyer and terminer, and general jail delivery throughout the State. Src. 5. The judges of the superior and inferior courts shall not charge juries with respect to matters of fact, but may state the testimony and declare the law. Src. 6. The judges of the superior court shall have power in all civil cases to issue writs of certiorart to remove any ease or transcript thereof, from any inferior court of re- cord into the superior, on sufficient cause supported by-oath or affirmation. Src. 7. The judges or justices of the inferior courts of law shall have power in all cases to issue writs of certiorarz to remove any case ora transcript thereof from any inferior jurisdiction, into their court on sufficient cause supported by oath or affirmation, Src. 8. No judge shall sit on the trial of any cause wherein the parties shall be con- nected with him by affinity or consanguinity, cxcept by consent of the parties. In case all the judges of the superior court interested in the event of any cause, or related to all or either of the parties, the governor of the State shall in such case specially commission three men of law knowledge for the determination thereof. Src. 9. All writs and other processes shall run in the name of the State of Tennessee . and bear test and be signed by the respective clerks. Indictments shall conclude ‘‘against the peace and dignity of the State.” Src. 10. Each court shall appoint its own clerk, who may hold office during good behavior. Src. 11. No fine shall be laid on any citizen of the State that shall exceed fifty dol- lars, unless it be assessed by a jury of his peers, who shall assess the fine at the time they find the fact, if they think the fine ought to be more than fifty dollars. Src. 12. There shall be justices of the peace appointed for each county, two for each captain’s company, except the company which includes the county town, which shall not exceed three, who shall hold their office during good behavior. The failure of this constitution to establish any court may justly be considered as one of its weakest points. A supreme court which owes its existence to the legislative body, and which at any time by the re- peal or the amendment of a single act might be altered or abolished, could scarcely be expected to retain its independence, nor could it be ex- pected to endanger its own life by calling into question the validity of a law. For such a court to pronounce an act unconstitutional would be useless, as the Legislature, having a sufficient majority to pass such an act, would upon any question of importance, have a majority to repeal the law creating the court itself. The danger from this was manifested in several instances, and was one of the strongest arguments in favor of the adoption of the new constitution in 1834. Im 1829 a controversy arose between the judiciary and the Legislature, and the result was the introduction of a bill which, had it become a law, would have abolished the then existing supreme court. The bill failed to pass by a single vote. The first General Assembly convened on the 28th of March, 1796, ene = a <<< ee Soe . - > r J a igessn nang = Se a a ee Sar oa ane ns a aE ee = ee makst ee Ee n _— c bon trae Ling, riggs Tet ag center * A : e Siteag be ce - Pe cae edna een ay it hd ek aN Pe fae ee pee A . oo hy ee ee Tees WES ee = ne PIES ge = AR — | re = —————————— 370 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. and soon after passed an act establishing a superior court of law and equity, and a court of pleas and quarter sessions, and defining their jurisdiction and mode of procedure, which did not differ materially from that of the courts under the authority of North Carolina and the Territory. In 1806 the district of Mero was divided into three separate and distinct judicial districts. The counties of Robertson, Montgom- ery, Dickson and Stewart were constituted one district by the name of Robertson. for which the courts were held at Clarksville. Jackson, Smith and Wilson Counties were organized into the district of Winchester, and courts were held at Carthage. The remaining counties, Davidson, Sumner. Williamson and Rutherford constituted the district of Mero, with the seat of justice at Nashville. The district of Hamilton. had been formed in 1793 from the counties of Jefferson and Knox. On November 16, 1809, an act was passed abolishing the superior court and establishing circuit courts, asupreme court of errors and appeals in its stead. The former was made to consist of one judge, and was to be held twice annually in each county. It was given the same jurisdiction in all matters in common law and equity as belonged to the former superior court, exclusive jurisdiction in all criminal causes and appellate jurisdic- tion in all cases from the court of pleas and quarter sessions. A solicitor- general and a judge for each circuit were elected by a joint vote of both houses of the General Assembly. The State was divided into five ju- dicial circuits, as follows: First Cireuit, Greene, Washington, Carter, Sul- livan, Hawkins, Grainger, Claiborne and Campbell. Second Circuit, Cocke, Jefferson, Sevier, Blount, Knox, Anderson, Roane, Rhea and Bledsoe. Third Cireuit, Smith, Warren, Franklin, Sumner, Overton, White and Jackson. Fourth Cireuit, Davidson, Wilson, Rutherford, Williamson, Maury, Giles, Lincoln and Bedford. Fifth Cireuit, Montgomery, Dick- son, Hickman, Humphreys, Stewart and Robertson. The supreme court of errors and appeals was made to consist of two judges in error and one circuit judge, and was to be held annually at the following places: Jonesboro, Knoxville, Carthage, Nashville and Clarks- ville. The jurisdiction of this court was appellate only. The act creat- ing these courts went into effect January 1, 1810, and Hugh L. White and George W. Campbell were appointed judges of the supreme court. In 1811 that part of the act which required the attendance of a cireuit judge in the court of errors and appeals was rescinded, and it was pro- vided that when the two judges of that court differed, the judgment of the circuit court was to be sustained. By the same act the supreme court was given exclusive jurisdiction in all cases in equity arising in the circuit courts. In 1813 a change was made in the court of pleas si! Bed eeeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. SFL and quarter sessions, by which five justices were appointed to hold the court, although the county business was transacted as before by all the magistrates on the first day of the session. New judicial pireite were formed from time to time as new counties were organized. In 1817 the Sixth Circuit was established from the counties of Lincoln, Giles, Maury, Bedford and Lawrence. ‘Two years later the counties of Roane, Rhea Bledsoe, Marion, McMinn, Hamilton and Monroe were constituted the Seventh Circuit. The counties of Henry, Carroll, Madison, Shelby, Wayne, Hardeman, Hardin and Perry were erected into the Eichth Circuit in 1821. The Ninth Cireuit was formed in 1823, from the coun- ties of Perry, Henderson, Carroll and Henry, and all the counties to be established west of Carroll and Henry. The Tenth Circuit, composed of Wayne, Hardin, McNairy, Hardeman, Fayette and Shelby was formed in 1830. Atthe same time Warren, Franklin, Bedford. Rutherford and Wilson Counties were constituted the Eleventh Cireuit, and Henderson and Perry were attached to the eighth. In 1815 the number of judges of the supreme court was increased to three, and Arehibald Roane was appointed as the third judge. A fourth judge was added in 1823, and the following year a fifth. In afew months, however, it was again re- duced to four and so continued until the change in the constitution was made. In 1831 the office of chief justice was created. As has been stated, the Legislature of 1829 discussed and voted upon a bill amending the judiciary system. The Senate committee in report- ing upon a bill from the House making some changes in the inferior courts, stated that they considered the judiciary system of Tennessee the most expensive and the least efficient of any in the United States. The objections to it as stated by them were “the multiplicity of courts which, either as original or appellete, can take jurisdiction of the same subject matter, the defective mode by which these courts are governed, the great delay of common right to the parties, and the unnecessary expense incurred by the number of courts in which the same cause may be in- vestigated.” The following description of the “law's delay,” as given by this com- mittee. leads one to infer that modern law courts are not so degenerate as they are usually considered: ‘“‘A suit may be commenced before a jus- tice of the peace for a sum not exceeding 90 cents, trial be had thereon, and an appeal taken to the county court: and notwithstanding the small sum in dispute, ambition, spite and other malicious motives frequently operate so as to influence one or both of the parties into a determination to run his adversary into as much cost and trouble as possible. For this purpose lawyers are employed on either side, witnesses-are summoned bySY Sy pat ee Sates Bie HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. neighborhoods to attend court, often at the most busy season of the year, much to their inconvenience and greatly to the injury of their private affairs; The cause may be continued from term to term for years, during which time ill-will, strife, and party animosity prevail, not only between the parties litigant, but unfortunately, the surrounding neighborhood often engages in feuds in consequence of it. At length the cause is tried in Orc ° the county court where, in all well regulated governments, it should end so far as relates to matters of fact. But instead of ending there, and re- eT — —_—- a TNR Ee , _ 1 * res ~ Reena a RR STS aah oer RRB St naa a - = I SS, Lew ee ie ase sp aaa as rae = pipet ra OT tna pote ae “ ; si : ns Sn x 2 oF “ —— Pmt as Jaap —~ — Seni rc es ar en ma Rane gm Sa He hie ‘is pa ‘gar EA storing tranquillity to the neighborhood and relieving a host of witnesses who have been drawn from the cultivation of their farms or from pursuit ae ee Sk, of their ordinary employment, an appeal is taken to the cireuit court, where additional fees must be given to lawyers, clerks, sheriffs, consta- bles and jurymen, and the parties have not gained one inch of ground we eS - ees ape Erna ~ a Ak an geen toward terminating their controversy, but must travel over the same oe sO oO ground in relation to law and facts in the cireuit court, and if their purses have not inereased in size their animosity toward each other has in- creased threefold. An appeal then is taken to the supreme court. Law- yers’ and clerks’ fees are again to be paid, and should judgment be ob- tained for the plaintiff he may conclude that notwithstanding his road to justice has been tedious, yet he has at length reached the end of his trouble. But even here his hopes, perhaps, are succeeded by disappoint- ment. A bill in equity may be filed in the cireuit court or district chancery court and the neighborhood again be disturbed in the taking of depositions. The parties are again compelled to give additional fees to lawyers, clerks and sheriffs. At length the cause is tried before the hith tribunal. An appeal is again taken to the supreme court from the decree of the chancellor where it is tried a sixth time with additional fees to clerks and other officers.” In estimating the expense of the courts to the State, the committee placed the cost of jurors in the county courts alone at $58,652 per an- num, “an amount more than sufficient to defray the whole expense of our government, including a session of the Legislature each year.’ ‘he costs In cases taken by appeal to the circuit court are estimated at $46, - 900 annually, and the cost of grand jurors at $30,876. ites te ry a i ay it SEH “fai ta: fei 4 ue fat te ‘ as Previous to 1834 the finding of articles of impeachment against judges and other officers was of quite frequent occurrence. The first case of the kind was that of David Campbell, one of the judges of the supe- rior court of law and equity, impeached in 1803. The.articles as pre- sented by the House of Representatives charged him with taking a bribe to the value of $50 from one James Miller, for which he agreed to procure a favorable decision for the latter in a case brought by John Den LL ee ae m hi — ed 4 ih yeeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. to recover the possession of two tracts of land situated in the county of Knox. ‘The managers on the part of the House were Wharton, Kennedy and Claiborne, who procured Jenkin Whiteside as counsel for the prose- eution. The counsel for the defense was Edward Scott, John Williams and Robert Whyte. The oath was administered to the senators by Hugh L. White, and Senator McMinn was chosen to preside. After hearing the evidence and the arguments by the counsel a ballot was taken, which resulted in a verdict of not guilty, the vote standing three for conviction and nine for acquittal. Leave was then given to the senators to have the reasons for their votes recorded, when the following were given by John Gass: ‘My reasons for saying not guilty on the articles of im- peachment exhibited against David Campbell, one of the judges of the superior court of law and equity in this State, are because, if the wit- ness in behalf of the prosecution could have such a corrupted heart as to attempt to bribe a judge to the injury of another man, it is a doubtful case whether the evidence ought to be taken in such latitude as to con- vict any person, therefore as it appears to me to be a doubtful case, if I should err at all, I wish to err on the side of mercy.” In 1811 articles of impeachment were exhibited by the House against William Cocke, judge of the First Circuit. The first two articles charged him with neglecting to hold court on various occasions, and with failing to open and close the sessions of the court properly. The third article charged that “for the corrupt purpose of partiality to his friend,” he had refused on one occasion to issue certain writs, to the great injury of the defendant. The case was continued until the next session of the Legislature, when the defendant was acquitted on the first two articles but convicted on the third by a vote of ten to three, and was accordingly removed from his office. One of the most ably contested cases of impeachment in the history of the State was that of Samuel H. Williams, surveyor of the Seventh District of the Congressional Reser- vation. He was charged with having demanded and taken extortionate fees, and with having allowed false entries to be made. ‘The trial was begun during the session of 1821, but was continued at the request of the defendant until the next session of the Legislature in 1822. It was taken up again on July 24, of that year, and continued for nearly a month, when he was found guilty upon four of the eleven articles. The attor- neys for the defense were Jenkin Whiteside, Samuel Houston, Thomas Washington, Alfred Balch and Charles G. Olmstead, while one of the managers on the part of the House was Felix Grundy. In 1829 articles of impeachment were found against Joshua Haskell, a judge-of the Highth Cireuit, charging him with having, on several oe- ar ee NS - “ ii | His i Hh | | iF ik i Nh Wh i Hi} Hy) Lehi te Wie bal | a) i ’ We} : ty eh | Hh} ul | i Be Hi Hh | Bhai i | it ii Wee il ih i til aie TE Hata ae} at 25 : 1 iia ca i 1 Tee hat.ps ' ah ; ty it hat it 0 Bt East Ne ti t 4ae ee -- - = Sa eet a ge — Lal n Gad chee re a. as; a Ket poe mae ae Lek Pe Screg ~~ cee i aR mmm Ea. Se a ee = — sno i cepameeteaasests irene sana’ pres. i ns fireman ¥ oe a wece : caren a ee a er : So enna PRES REERNEan —.— se % 4 nen a — Ce - Sar See coe SE ae fae a Peas on 6B Gae= a ease aaegllitpe Fae Pe “ Sener tn ace on ate Po ap CB ima enn ai ea, 374 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. easions. left the court house during the progress of a trial to engage in conversation. business and amusement. The testimony given at these trials throws some light on the character of the courts of those early times and of the houses in which they were held. During the trial of Judge Haskell a witness testified that the house 1n which the court was held in one of the counties was a very uncomfortable one—“‘occupied by hogs during the recess of the court and infested with fleas.” Another witness, an attorney, stated that during the progress of a certain trial the judge was off the bench from between 9 and 10 o'clock: until 12 o'clock, and that upon another occasion during the argument of the counsel, the judge went with him outside of the court house and ate a part of a watermelon—a doubtful example of judical dignity. Gabriel Fowlkes testified that at one time during a trial he was sent for the judge, and found him “either at the show or inthe court house yard;” he was not positive at which place. During the progress of this trial a diffi- culty arose between the counsel employed as to the admissibility of testi- mony; the question was referred to a disinterested attorney, the judge being absent, who gave a decision, and the cause progressed. Judge Haskell. however, seems to have been a universal favorite on his cireuit, and notwithstanding the testimony he was aequitted of the charge, the vote of the Senate being equally divided. In 1829 N. W. Williams, judge of the Third Judical Circuit, was tried upon charges of neglect of official duty. One of the articles of impeachment charged that ‘while Hopkins L. Turney, an attorney of that court, was arguing before him a certain civil suit concerning an In- dian reservation, which suit then and there was and had been on trial for one day, he, the said judge, unmindful of the duties of his office and his obligation to perform them faithfully and impartially to the best of his skill and ability, did carelessly, negligently and unlawfully go to sleep and continue asleep for the space of one hour; waking from his sleep he inquired what suit it was, and being told by said attorney, said he was related to some of the parties, and could not sit in that case.” Charges of partiality were also preferred against him. He was acquitted, and it was generally believed that the prosecution was inspired by the animosity of some of the attorneys who practiced before him. The new constitution of 1834 made no radical change in the judicial system then in existence, but the supreme court was rendered indepen- dent of the Legislature by embodying provision for its establishment in that constitution. For the purpose of comparison, the article relating to the judiciary is given in full:HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ARTICLE VI. SEcTION 1. The judicial power of this State shall be vested in one supreme court, in such inferior courts as the Legislature shall from time to time ordain and establish, and the judges thereof, and in justices of the peace. The Legislature may also vest such juris- diction as may be deemed necessary in corporation courts. Sec. 2. The supreme court shall be composed of three judges, one of whom shall re- side in each of the three grand divisions of the State; the concurrence of two of said judges shall in every case be necessary to a decision. The jurisdiction of this court shall be appellate only, under such restrictions and regulatious as may from time to time be prescribed by law; but it may possess such other jurisdiction as is now conferred by law on the present supreme court. Said court shall be held at one place, at one place only, in each of the three grand divisions in the State. Src. 8. The General Assembly shall, by joint vote of both houses, appoint judges of the several courts of law and equity; but courts may be established to be holden by jus tices of the peace. Judges of the supreme court shall be thirty-five years of age, and shall be elected for the term of twelve years. Sec. 4. The judges of such inferior courts as the Legislature may establish shall be thirty years of age, and shall be elected for the term of eight years. Sec. 5. The Legislature shall elect attorneys for the State by joint vote of both houses of the General Assembly, who shall hold their offices for the term of six years. In all cases when an attorney for any district fails or refuses to attend and prosecute according to law, the court shall have power to appoint an attorney pro tempore. Sec. 6. Judges and attorneys for the State may be removed from office by a concur- rent vote of both houses of the General Assemby, each house voting separately, but two thirds of all the members elected to each house must concur in such vote; the vote shall be determined by ayes and noes, and the names of the members voting for or against the judge or attorney for the State, together with the cause or causes of removal, shall be entered on the journals of each house, respectively. The judge or attorney for the State, against whom the Legislature may be about to proceed, shall receive notice thereof, accompanied with a copy of the cause alleged for his removal, at least ten days before the day on which either house of the General Assembly shall act thereupon. Sec. 7. The judges of the supreme and inferior courts shall, at stated tithes, receive a compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, which shall not be increased or diminished during the term for which they are elected. They shall not be allowed any fees or perquisites of office, nor hold any other office of trust or profit under this State or the United States. Sec. 8. The jurisdiction of such inferior courts as the Legislature may from time to time establish shall be regulated by law. Sec. 9. Judges shall not charge juries with respect to matters of fact, but may state the testimony and declare the law. Src. 10. The judges or justices of such inferior courts of law as the Legislature may establish shall have power in all civil cases to issue writs of certvorarz to remove any cause or transcript thereof, from any inferior jurisdiction, into said court on sufficient cause, supported by oath or affirmation. Sec. 11. No judge of the supreme or inferior courts shall preside in the trial of any ‘cause in the event of which he may be interested or where either of the parties shall'be connected with him by affinity or consanguinity within such degrees as may be prescribed by law, or in which he may have been of counsel or in which he may have presided in any inferior court, except by consent of all the parties. In case all or any of the judges of the supreme court shall be thus disqualified from presiding on the trial of any cause or causes the court or the judges thereof shall certify the same to the governor of the State, and he shall forthwith specially commission the requisite number of men of law knowledge for the trial and determination thereof. In case of sickness of any of the judges of the su- preme or inferior court so that they, or any of them, are unable to attend, the Legisla- 4 i eG \ fal \ hi 1 } } } l } it ' ) | 44 He ) ee ' Whe Mth Aiea } \ Ht } | i | i” \ | ii iT . did Wi if i i : | i} Hal Wid Nina Pata | bait ih : Cai Wa Wa } Bia | |; 4 ' Hk \ \ et } Wr ‘ EE 9 ah : Hie { Wid} i . i ' ; Hae ivan yt lie i { iad j | ih : i i | v4 ! iy inh Ln a Hl bhi 1 Pia} ; Wei iti a \ ' iy i Hi! 1) Hil ‘ bay | } bit nha Baia \ ij id i i in} Hy) kt bie j ri Lint tt pian ent! ty Pn ae yst tl i ) \ : " ba i ( He 4) be Pat fg Say t Wie. ia) it } ' whi ' oh aia WG abt Hit fat 4 Whe Way ; ti i pati I ii Ht mi i ae { ee +9 } j URE a ‘ ifs ite | tig ji Hi} | ahi i i di] | aHh i nt at yi We 376 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. eT lect i | ture shall be authorized to make provision by gener ral laws that special judges may be ap- pointed to attend said courts. e Src. 12. All writs and other processes shé all run in the name of the State of Tennessee, Indictments shall conclude “‘against the peace and dignity of the State.’ Src. 13. Judges of the supreme court shall appoint their clerks, who shall hold their ff offices for the period of six years. Chancellors (if courts of chancery shallibe established) a shall appoint their clerks and masters, who shall hold their offices for a period of six years. HH Clerks of such inferior courts as may be hereafter established, which shall be required to I | and bear test and be signed by the respective clerks. } | ra Ps | be holden in the respective counties of the State, shall be elected by the qualified voters t thereof for the term of four years. They shall be removed from office for malfeasance, phi i incompetency or neglect of duty in such manner as may be prescribed by law. i Ai Src. 14. No fine shall be laid on any citizen of the State that shall exceed fifty dol- Pe Jars. unless it shall be assessed by a jury of his peers, who shall assess the fine at the time they find the fact, if they think the fine should be more than fifty dollars. i Src. 15. The different counties in the State shall be laid off,as the General Assembly may direct, into districts of convenient size, so that the whole number in each county shall not be more than twenty-five, or four for every one hundred square miles. There shall | be two justices of the peace and one constable elected in each district by the qualified voters therein, except districts including county towns, which shall elect three justices and two constables. The jurisdiction of said officers shall be co-extensive with the county. Justices of the peace shall be elected for the term of two years. Upon the removal of either of said officers from the district in which he was elected his office shall become yva- i | | cant from the time of such removal. Justices of the peace shall be commissioned by the governor. The Legislature shall have power to provide for the appointment of an addi- tional number of justices of the peace in incorporated towns. - a a a a ES TET Sane ae a ii i Waa The General Assembly, which convened after the adoption of the i constitution in 1835, passed an act establishing a supreme court with the same jurisdiction it had previously possessed; also chancery, eireuit and county courts. The State was divided into three chancery divisions, for each of which a chancellor was appointed. These divisions were in turn divided into chancery districts, there being nine in Hast Tennessee, fif- teen in Middle Tennessee and six in West Tennessee. Chancery courts, however, were not held in many of the counties until several years after The circuit courts were made courts of general jurisdiction, and were siven exclusive jurisdiction in all cases triable by jury, both criminal s J y ) and civil, which had previously come before the county court. The State j | } | | A the passage of this act. ' | | | | } was divided into eleven judicial circuits as follows: First Circuit, Greene, Washington, Sullivan, Johnson, Hawkins, Grainger and Claiborne Coun- i | ties. Second, Cooke, Jefferson, Sevier, Blount, Knox, Camphell, Anderson ay! | bial and Morgan. Third, Roane, Rhea, Meigs, Bledsoe, Marion, Hamilton, | McMinn and Monroe. Fourth, Smith, Overton, White, Jackson, Fentress and Warren. Fifth, Wilson, Rutherford, Bedford, Coffee and Franklin. Sixth, Williamson, Davidson and Sumner. Seventh, Dickson, Hickman : Humphreys, Stewart, Montgomery and Robertson. Eighth, Lincoln, Giles, Maury and Lawrence. Ninth, Henry, Weakley, Obion, Dyer, Gib- al Kinga! ~ eee ag ee ee ne At eg A ANI etapa a eoHISTORY OR TENNESSEE. ote son, Carroll and Benton. Tenth, Perry, Henderson, Madison, Haywood Tipton and Lauderdale. Eleventh, Shelby, Fayette, Hardeman, McNairy, Hardin and Wayne. County courts were established to be held by all the magistrates in the county, but one-third of them were made a quo rum to transact all business except the levying of taxes and the appro- priating of sums amounting to more than $50. The same jurisdiction was given to the single justice that he had previously exercised. In 1837 three new judicial circuits were established, the Twelfth con- sisting of Cocke, Sevier, Jefferson, Graingor, Claiborne and Campbell; the Thirteenth, of Warren, Lincoln, Franklin and Coffee; and the Four- teenth of Lawrence, Wayne, Hardin, Perry, Carroll and Benton. At the same time the counties of Monroe and Roane were attached to the Second Circuit. In 1848 criminal courts were established in Shelby and David- son Counties, and were given exclusive jurisdiction over all crimes and misdemeanors. Similar courts were established in Montgomery, Ruther- ford and Wilson Counties in 1848. Sections.3 and 5 of Article VI of the constitution were amended to read as follows: Src. 8. The judges of the Supreme Court shall be elected by the qualified voters of the State at large, and the judges of such inferior courts as the Legislature may establish shall be elected by the qualified voters residing within the bounds of any district or circuit to which such inferior judge, or judges, either of law or equity may be assigned, by ballot, in the same manner that members of the General Assembly are elected. Courts may be established to be holden by Justices of the Peace. Judges of the Supreme Court shall be thirty-five years of age, and shall be elected for the term of eight years. Suc. 5. An Attorney-General for the State shall be elected by the qualified voters of the State at large, and the Attorney for the State, for any circuit or district to which a judge of an inferior court may be assigued, shall be elected by the qualified voters within the bounds of such district or circuit in the same manner that members of the General Assembly are elected; all said attorneys, both for the State and circuit or district, shall hold their offices for the term of six years. In all cases where the attorney for any dis- trict fails or refuses to attend and prosecute according to law, the court shall have powet to appoint an attorney pro tempore. Upon the reorganization of the supreme court in 1835, William B. Turley. William B. Reese and Nathan Green were elected Judges, all of whom had resigned previous to the adoption of the above amendment, Judge Reese in 1848, Turley in 1850, and Green in 1852. Their places were supplied by the election of Robert J. McKinney, A. W. O. Totten and Robert L. Caruthers. At the election in 1853, these men were all ce p re-elected by the people. Judge Totten resigned two years later and William R. Harris was elected to succeed him; The latter continued to 1 . * > - ( ~ ) . Ti wd o hold the office until his death on June 19, 1558, when Archibald Wright was chosen to fill the vacancy. In 1861 Judge Caruthers resigned, and was succeeded by William FE’. Cooper. During the civil war no term of this court was held, and nearly all of the inferior courts were also sus- SaSaterT or oan SEE ee a ee ae ee axes 7S a RIOR HE ee. aspen Soe Ae eee 208 Ra IRIE “eae Nig, op fi ak te ana eas meme SNGS aE aR epie aes a = ae ee Ce a Sg es 7 sinner ereh renner cent eae Seas aa a aeawanee baat ote es a see ee ae wee ee *: . ie Saher ee seers . 7 Sole eek ake eae a phar re UE ate es aoe 5 a ~~ ae ae Tp a, nT = ene Sa ag SOR ce an Nemnag te meagre iil Sncapapoe einen aS PIES sage ae ae ip TEI 5A Cle aula Bi ap RE TS me 375 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. pended. PI bench vacant and appointed Samuel Milligan, J. O. Shackleford and At the close of hostilities Gov. Brownlow declared the supreme Alvin Hawkins as judges. In 1867 Judge Shackleford resigned, but dur- ing the following year was reappointed, Horace H. Harrison having During 1868 both Hawkins and Mil- higan presented their resignations, and their places were filled by the In May of the next year there was an election by the people under the restricted suffra- ges which then prevailed, and George Andrews, Andrew Mclain and Alvin Hawkins were chosen judges. held the office during the interim. 7 ~ +. ; ¢ a , [ * co appointment of Henry G. Smith and George Andrews. The new constitution of 1870 made but little change in the judicial system, except to increase the number of judges of the supreme court to five; a large number of cases had accumulated, owing to the immense amount of litigation immediately following the war; and to expedite bus- iness, it was provided, that at the first election six judges should be chosen, and that they should be divided into two sections, who should hold court simultaneously in the same division of the State. Itwas fur- ther provided, should any vacancy occur after January 1, 1873, it should remain unfilled. An election was held in August, 1870, at which the judges chosen were Alfred O. P. Nicholson, James W. Deaderick, Peter Turney, Thomas A. R. Nelson, John L, T. Sneed, and Thomas J. Free- man. The first named was chosen chief justice, which position he held until his death, in 1876, when James W. Deaderick, the present incum- bent, succeeded him. In 1871 Judge Nelson resigned and was suc- ceeded by Robert McFarland. At the election in August, 1878, all of the judges then on the bench were re-elected, with the exception of J. L. IT. Sneed, whose place was filled by William F. Cooper. The large number of cases coming before the supreme court impelled the Legis- lature, in 1875, to pass an act providing for the appointment of a special commission, to try causes referred to them, upon the written agreement of all the parties to the suit, or of their attorneys. Their decisions were made final, but were submitted to the Supreme court for approval. This commission was appointed to sit for a few months only, at Jackson and Memphis. Bya similar act passed two years later, two commissions were appointed, one to sit at Nashville, and the other at Jackson, from May until December of that year. In 1883 a court of referees was es- tablished for each of the three grand divisions of the State, to hear civil causes, and to present a statement of each to the Supreme court for a final decision, privilege being given to either party to the suit, dissatis- fied with the decree of the referees, to file objection to it. The judges appointed for Middle Tennessee were W. I,, Eakin, W. ( ’ Caldwell andHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 379 John Tinnon; for East Tennessee, John Frizzell, John L. T. Sneed and R. T. Kirkpatrick; for West Tennessee, D. A. Snodgrass, David Bright and John E. Garner. Judge Garner resigned in July, 1883 and was suc- ceeded by E. L. Gardenhire. The court of referees for the eastern and western divisions of the State expired by limitation January 1, 1885, and the one for Middle Tennessee, April 30, 1886. The present Ssu- preme court consists of the following judges:. James W. Deaderick, Peter Turney, Thomas J. Freeman, W. F. Cooper and J. B. Cooke. In many of the States within the past few years, the distinction be- tween law and equity courts has been abolished, and equity jurisdiction given to the law courts. The same has been done in Tennessee, to some extent, with this difference, that law jurisdiction has been given to equity courts. In 1877 an act was passed conferring upon the chancery court concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit court of all civil cases, except for injuries to person, property or character, involving unliquidated damages. A large number of suits are, therefore, brought in the chan- cery court, since upon appeal they are tried de novo by the supreme court. In 1870 the State was divided into twelve chancery districts, for each of which a chancellor is elected. Several special courts, probate, criminal and others, have been established to meet the wants of towns, and the more populous counties. In 1870 the law court of Nashville was established to have concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit court of Davidson County, and to be held quarterly. It eontinued until 1877, when it was abolished. The jurisdiction ot the cizeuit courts has not been materially changed since the adoption of the constitution of 1834; but owing to the creation of new counties, the judicial circuits have been subject to frequent alterations. As now constituted they are as follows: First Cireuit—Carter, Greene. Hancock, Hawkins, Johnson, Sullivan, Unicoi and Washington. Second Circuit—Claiborne, Campbell, Grainger, Union, Hamblen, Jeft- ferson, Cocke, Anderson and Sevier. Third Circuit—Blount, Monroe, Lou- don, Roane, Morgan and Scott. Fourth Cireuit—Bradley, Polk, Meigs, Rhea, Bledsoe, Sequatchie, Marion, Hamilton. McMinn and James. Fifth Circuit—Pickett, Fentress, Cumberland, Putnam, Overton, Clay, Jackson, Smith. Macon and Trousdale. Sixth Cireuit—Van Buren, Grundy, Frank- lin, Coffee, Warren, Moore, Lincoln, De Kalb and White. Seventh Cir- cuit—Davidson, Williamson and Cheatham. Bighth Circuit- — Wilson, Rutherford, Cannon, Bedford and Marshal. Ninth Cireuit—Maury, Giles, Lawrence, Wayne, Hardin, Lewis and Hickman. Tenth Cirecuit—Sumner, Robertson, Montgomery, Stewart, Houston, Dickson and Humphreys. Eleventh Cireuit—MeNairy, Chester, Madison, Henderson, Decatur and con ener ee aaa Se eeeee ; 2 ene NT ara ts a _- ae ‘ om = - = — spit aaa ae ic Wag ae eens 3 ae a = ae - nag oe ee Mer Ses Pes eed id : oe fon tene z. : SS ae aa - ae et io : = = Nees Ee oe Sea ee aes = a Pos cme shat z och Taw oe om eae ae . OS “ c Soe oT a Fat ene arena te a SS oS a as nl RE OE a ake RA SN re ce Ee ae = os = : : : . 7 — — = as Bn Se a which ran a vein of strong common sense. He was good at repartee He possessed in a marked degree the pow- er to arouse and sway the passions of the heart, to excite sympathy or and his wit fairly sparkled. indignation, to parry the blows’ of an adversary, and to carry his point by brilliant charge. He was a consummate judge of human nature, and this rendered him unrivaled in the selection of a jury. He was unsur- passed in developing the facts of a case, and wonderful in the cross-ex- amination of a witness introduced against his client. He generally re- lied upon his associate council to bring into court the books containine the law of the case on which they were employed, and the law was Fond and commented upon by those associates, and then when Mr. Grundy came to close the case, so clear were his deductions, so striking his illustra- tions, so systematically would he tear to pieces the superstructure of the op- posing council, and so vividly portray the right and justice for which he contended, that all who heard him regarded him as the finest lawyer of that or any other age. So thoroughly did he carry the crowd with him that he may be aptly likened to Paul when he made his great speech be- fore King Agrippa, and extorted from that monarch the expression ‘al- most thou persuadest me to be a Christian.’ ”’ Another contemporary, in many respects the opposite of Judge Grundy, was Hugh Lawson White, a man remarkable alike for his eecen- tricities, and for the very high order of his mental and moral endow- ments. He had but little taste for general literature, but in all that per- tains to his profession he was _ well versed, and there was no one for whom he had greater contempt than for the ‘ case lawyer,” except it was a mere “case judge.” His incorruptible integrity, and his straighttor ward contempt for any advantage obtained from legal quibbles gave him so strong a hold upon the esteem and confidence of the community, that it would have been difficult to empanel a jury not biased in his favor. He was a deep and comprehensive thinker, was remarkable for his powers of comparison, had an acute sense of the ludicrous and was a lover of wit. His sentences were generally short, and so selected and arranged that He was appointed a judge of the superior court of law and equity in the fall of 1501, and continued on the bench until April, 1807. whatever hesaid could be readily followed. Two years later he was elected a judge of the supreme court of errors and appeals, which office he held until December. 1814. of the bar was marked by that kindness and genuine courtesy which While on the bench his intercourse with the members characterized him in every relation in life. ‘The perspicuity, accuracy and uncompromising honesty of his opinions raised him into such hieh oO © i i] : | } md | it ) i fi ae | Nil | He | {i i) Ha ath eat ei Heo i Wh sag : Wy Ne Pi rat ) as| } Neate | i ti i Hier =f tl) i Hie ; ik it s00 Hh Hit 14} Eu Lh He Hig | Hil tH } ih bn a | tin )) Vee : Data Lag 1h ay Bhan Min it i" MW WV ei Hy thas hast iit belie pall ri) ita viet bhi ' it iA eo} : tite oad un LAAT) iNet Hi a te iH fan { iH WEeEER ood hewiid ot iy Wein Eh } Find tet 1 eat tirag tap 3 aan ee eae Sea aan = ee 5 spare EEs a = = _— er - x vind 2 3 ss Re Set - 7 - ee she or aes eames 2 Se - . ; : ce . ns peda Se eee eg PRS eae ae Yee = : ae 7 fans. Ry tered ok ere set an - 7 LES, he He Spares =e a eee Sere doen = “a + ———= ates a hess “ ne - i Ra Sg OE ie aa Mae: mens ae Sead neki Fort 5 + eS a i ian ean SALA alah aah ices sa ag nena Saree = > fgg SSE ds ga eer aac ab st alliage nae eA te a WORE Taree a a mene ee, | Tat eye a he Tah os SE 388 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. and universal estimation that his final resignation of his seat was re- ceived with great regret. Another member of this galaxy of brilliant legal minds was, for a time, Thomas H. Benton, who-removed from the State in 1810. He be- gan the practice of law in Franklin, and it is said that from the first he was “much fonder of political pursuits than of the study of law books, and greatly preferred the making of stump speeches to the argument of legal cases.” He seems not to have applied himself with diligence to his profession, and his practice as a lawyer was never, large. But he was destined for a broader field of usefulness. Possessed of a commanding intellect, of large and liberal culture, industrious, temperate, resolute and endowed with a memory whose tenacity was marvelous, he soon placed himself in the front rank of those who shaped the councils of the nation, and for many years he exercised almost unbounded control over the politics of not only his own State but the entire West, where he molded public opinion to suit himself. His history, however, belongs rather to Missouri than to Tennessee. Without doubt the greatest jurist ever upon the bench in Tennessee was John Haywood,* who, previous to his coming to the State in 1807, had already secured the highest judicial and professional honor in the courts of North Carolina. That he was especially adapted to his chosen profession is evident from the fact that without the advantages of a library, or the benefit of legal tuition in a lawyer’s office, he fitted him- self for the practice of law, and so thorough was his preparation that when at the age of twenty-four years he made his first argument before the supreme court, he is said to have displayed as much learning and as comprehensive a view of the great landmarks of the law as any argu- ment that had ever been made before it. The following characterization of him by a contemporary is an eminently correct one: ‘Judge Haywood was a fine genius and a most powerful and unrivaled advocate. In tact and eloquence—such eloquence as reaches the heart and convinces the judgment—he had no equal in Tennessee. He was often employed with and against the late Felix Grundy in the most critical criminal cases, and it would not be saying too much, perhaps, to say that as an orator he was equal if not superior to that distinguished advocate. Both had been on the supreme bench of their respective States, and both came to Ten- nessee preceded by the most: brilliant reputations. Both were men of great learning and attainments, but in all the learning which pertained to his profession Judge Haywood stood far in advance of his great rival. He possessed inexhaustible stores of imagination; was quick and ready *The publishers designed to have the portrait of Judge Haywood appear in this work, but notwith- standing wide inquiries were made, no likeness of him of any description could be found.—Eb.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 829 in argument, and prompt in reply. But withal his judgment was too much under the dominion of imaginative faculty, which gave to some of his opinions too great an air of eccentricity and uncertainty. He had many sympathies in common with his fellow-men, and highly cherished their good opinion, particularly of his own fame. He was ambitious in the highest degree, somewhat overbearing in his desire to be considered ‘the court,’ and perhaps thought too highly of his own and too little of his brother judges’ opinions, and felt that he was the master-spirit in the settlement and determination of all leading questions of jurisprudence. I do not think I should do him injustice if I should say he never deliy- ered an opinion without desiring the presence of a large audience.” Associated with Judge Haywood for a time, upon the bench of the supreme court of Tennessee, was Wilham L. Brown, a man possessing many traits of character in common with that eminent jurist. He began the practice of his profession in Clarksville, Tenn., but considering that field too narrow for his abilities he removed to Nashville. He was ambi- tious in the highest degree, and his tenacity of purpose was such that no difficulty, however great, could deter him from an undertaking. . His knowledge of the law was such as few men succeed in acquiring, and his scholarly attainments, although not so extensive, were yet respectable. Gov. Foote says of him: “A man of a more fervid and insatiable ambi- tion has never lived, though the purity and elevation of his nature effect- ually held him from all those low and debasing arts by which a mere- tricious fame is so often acquired. A legitimate and honest celebrity he sought for with all the earnestness of a zealous and hopeful tempera- ment; he toiled for it with exhaustless assiduity. He meditated upon the means by which it was to be realized through many an anxious day and many a restless night. He seemed to have been born with an indom- itable confidence in his own capacity for self-advancement, and his ulti- mate realization of a splendid destiny commensurate with his aspirations and indispensable to his earthly happiness.” In 1822 he was appointed a judge of the supreme court, but remained upon the bench only two years. The duties of the office were distasteful to him, and he preferred the excitement of the advocate rather than the calm dignity of the judge. The chief cause of his resignation, however, is said to have been that ‘he was not content to occupy a place where the overshadowing influence of Judge Haywood’s long established fame necessarily held him in sec- ondary dignity.” His retirement was a subject of universal regret. In striking contrast with this remarkable man was his successor, John Catron, a man as “simple minded and as simple mannered as a ehild.”’ Yet with all his innocence and generous simplicity he had a mind of — = — — and exact and log- ical reasoning. He was an industrious student, very temper, without His opinions are fond of readme,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. OO od so extensively informed and had a memory of wonderful tenacity; but he was not remarkable for close and persevering application to business. After his retirement from the supreme court, in 1850, he was judge of the common law and chancery court of Memphis until his death about eighteen months later. The bar of East Tennessee has always been distinguished for its su- perior ability, but of the long list of illustrious names engraven in its temple of fame, none occupy a higher position than that of Robert J. McKinney, the successor of Judge Reese. He was a native of Ireland, but spent the greater part.of his lite in Tennessee. His arguments at the bar were always remarkable for their logical force and precision, their freedom from all cireumlocution or mere parade of words, and were occasionally tinctured with something approaching sarcasm and irony. On the bench he was diligent, painstaking and unrelaxing in his labors, as his reported opinions so satisfactorily attest. He was accused of being occasionally a little too stern and austere in his demeanor toward mem- bers of the bar, and was not a little inclined to caution attorneys to avoid anything at all approaching a superfluity of illustration. Robert Looney Caruthers, the successor of Judge Green, has been said, by those who knew him, to have been the best. advocate that Ten- nessee ever produced. That he was a most remarkable man is evident from the fact that reared in comparative poverty, without influential friends, he raised himself by his own efforts to the foremost place in the estimation of the people. Although he held several official positions he had but little fondness for political life, and it was in the law that he found what was most congenial to his taste, and which best occupied his great intellect. His marked characteristic as a lawyer was persuasive logic, based upon a substratum of common sense. His powers as a de- claimer merely were not of the first order. He perhaps despised the mere tinsel and glare of what is frequently mistaken for true eloquence. Gentle of nature, both in manner and feeling, he preferred to carry with him the conviction of the audience by soft and mild leading rather than bold assertion and overwhelming dominance. but to attain his ends, success in his profession and success in his courses, he never con- descended to trickery or unworthy arts of any description. He was labor- ious in the preparation of cases; he trusted nothing to chance or inspira- tion; he left down no gaps; he tightened up the loose joints, and always came to the battle fully armed and equipped. He had great power of labor, which if not genius or talent is yet their neccessary concomitant, if success is to follow. But above all things perhaps his most available means, especially before juries, was he ‘“‘ knew what was in man,’ motive, PSNI fn tn ieee ‘ ee ie ec ee ee ener ee a aeeae) coe. Sse ee a y i FS i CIE eS 3 : ‘ t Sows c= eS ar = rt: ae ‘2 ete Fe Sa rR Poni ai Tad 7 -—~% - - ms : a ~ ha — — _ SanannnnaianE ane er ae ~ — are prouteeeengntannmatal i oe PMR TAS EE ee See a a a — a 7 “ hes - a 35 = — 7 SS Gi ER OS. Sa eS ame we ee ae eg PPE ice” ra eS — SSeS See = aa i A earn pa pe apa gee men Tasca ce ea ae oe AE MEET ATH - ago 7 [eens a ‘3 Z aire oo eee ET ES he 5 ~ Z i : wes SAE" ale Nig : 5 ~ sts 7 - - - - a > i ; - * ad w ¥ RR le ana s Te ghia cane Si ss Pans ae wae ee Pg AL as Beto gti es, _ a Po tena eCRIISS geen ee mre at eae | qaemmeneipi ec: | i i "i a ait RAIRIN SEI ria ed - ESS a sn ace ens gt he | th - ag aa ores ini calc cant measaeoee = Sato aod eo ey et ae — aaa $ ote matting, ’ wy = Lote Sper ort acs Se ~~ Say Re oe Spt alny ye, shea le ae 396 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. probable action, influence of surroundings, the strength and weakness of man. varieties of character, and upon a knowledge of these he built up his argument. There isa variety of opinion whether Judge Caruthers shone more brilliantly at the bar or on the bench; the opinion is unan- imous. however, that he was an able, upright, laborious and conscientious expounder of the laws in his official capacity. He brought to the bench the same broad common sense, the same effective learning, the same com- prehensive mind that had characterized him throughout his previous life; and all through his opinions there is apparent a careful judicial search for truth, and a firm determination to uphold the right in morals and in law. The last years of his life were spent as the leading professor of the law department of Cumberland University, of which he was one of the principal founders. Archibald W. O. Totten, the successor of Judge Turley, was born in Middle Tennessee, but at an early age removed with his father to the western division of the State. He studied law, and was admitted to practice in Gibson County. His temperate and regular habits, his laborious investigations of the cases intrusted to his care, and his fidelity to all his professional engagements, secured to him a full and lucrative practice, and he rose rapidly to independence and distinction. His person was tall, manly and striking; his manners bland and courteous in a high degree, and his general deportment dignified, without stiffness or reserve. In the most exciting debates at the bar, he never descended to gling or lost the serenity of his temper, or the tranquillity of his manner. He retired from the supreme bench in August, 1855, and was wran succeeded by Wiliam R. Harris, of Memphis. Judge Harris was born in North Carolina, but was reared chiefly in Bedford County, Tenn His educational advantages were somewhat meager, but, notwithstanding this hindrance, his strong, native talents enabled him to reach high rank in his profession. He began the practice of law in Paris, Henry County, where, in a few years, lie evinced so much ability that he was made judge of the circuit court, a position which he held until 1845. Six years later he removed to Memphis, where he presided over the com- mon law and chancery court until his elevation to the supreme bench. As an advocate he was earnest and forcible, and neither in his oral or written productions was he ever known to affect mere ornaments of speech. In his judicial capacity he was cautious, laborious and circumspect in arriving at his conclusions, and inflexible in main- taining them. Judge:Harris was killed in a steam-boat explosion on M1, the Mississippl River in 1858. he vacaney oceasioned by his death was filled by the appointment-of Archibald Wright, also of Memphis,¥ Bee Bee af FROM PHOTO BY THUSS, KOELEEIN & GIERS. NASHVILLE James K. Poikne tite ne ee “Saas ae SS AP ee tery een eater on an ere a ae Soke ae mao pitts ce ao eS Soper tert may cima tpn ie Tog atin an te iad OP RM i pe : SEES = + ve = eeeieee Ra oa -eanintt Te cine Pat Ge LI Soi Fiera er acai ioal eae eee age ea hie na siti eee is pce EIA a Rsk BETS TEES — ri a: pecans a i sil sae en es eee ee se 1 | 4 | 1) iy i : j } Ve i Ha Haat if tau I) i i | | ENERO - SST ae mee SaaSHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 397 oi WV eee 7a, i sk . : F but a native of Maury County. He obtained a fairly good education before entering upon his career as a lawyer, which he did in 1839. He possessed great capacity for labor, and by sheer strength and directness, attention to business and tenacity of purpose, he won his way to distinction. During his brief career upon the supreme bench he manifested his eminent fitness for that high position. His Opinions are clear, forcible, direct, térsely stating the points and deciding the matter before him, briefly reaching his conclusions without verbiage or over-argumentation. In both his physical and men- tal qualities he was a man of striking individuality. He possessed a models of judicial style magnificent physique, and a constitution equal to any strain upon its powers of endurance. The salient traits of his character were his origi- nality, strength and clearness of intellect, tenacity of purpose and indom- itable energy. These were all the men who occupied a position upon the supreme bench previous to the civil war. W. F. Cooper was appointed to succeed Robert L. Caruthers in 1861, but the supension of the court prevented his taking his seat. It now remains to notice some of the distinguished members of the bar during the period from 1834 to 1861. ‘ One of the most talented men whom Tennessee has given to the world was John Bell, whose career as a politician and statesman, how- ever, over-towers his reputation as an advocate. As a sketch of his life appears elsewhere, only brief mention of him is made in this con- nection. He began his career as a lawyer in Williamson County, but soon after removed to Nashville and formed a partnership with Judge Crabb. Although he entered Congress when he was little more than thirty years of age, he had acquired a high standing at the bar as a law- yer of great acuteness, research and ability, and as a speaker of no ordi- nary merit. James K. Polk was a contemporary of Bell, both having been born in thesame year. The former, not quite so precocious as his rival, did not begin the practice of law until about twenty-five years of age, but when he did begin he was thoroughly equipped for his forensic struggles. He opened an office at Columbia, where almost from the first he occupied a front rank in the profession. His naturally strong intellect, disciplined by years of study to close and accurate reasoning, together with his known moral integrity, made him a most powerful adversary before the bar. His early entrance into the field of politics, however, practically closed his legal career. Ephraim H. Foster, a prominent contemporary of the above, was a native of Kentucky, but when a small child came with his father’s family 25 at ana EPCRA Tet aon EE a ae aN a a TD Khe I PARI so eae anri : a2 tee mit Nah A Sa aus ee aa : ae el i = ———— Hae HE i i , Yr 7 _ “ Hee 398 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. a ee Wit] i to Tennessee. He received as good an education asthe times afforded, am 1 graduating Ww ith the first class matriculated in © umberland College in 1813. He then studied law with John Trimble. Very soon after begin- lose application to business, together with his = Seien ie Te EE Ee se eR ST AT SITET as ncaa ne ee jest ning its practice, his ec natural ability and preposse ssing His practice be coming too.large for one person, appearance, placed him in the front Wi Seon rank of his profession he formed a partner: ship with William L. Brown, with whom he remained until the latter’s elevation to the bench of the supreme court. From that nt from practice he was associated with Francis B. pe ragga - — PS Bie time until his retireme Fogg. Col. Foster was a fine speaker, but he had by nature a quick and violent temper which he did not always control. It is said that on one Wewng a, case in which he was greatly interested, he be- a 2 SS Geren a ee ee Sta oe Pe tis —. ~ a= ee Sh Te LE fe TO i a dalacias TS oe FE - Se: ae Nees * 5s m Scie ee = = — Frac - . = =e =e > Sa : — aia - “Sate inal Panama 2 RT oceasion. while angry at some rem: ark made by the judge, and threw a book at tit Hi came aa ik him. The judge, unmindful of his position, sprang at Col. Foster, with a eA heavy walking stick in his hand, and but for the interference of friends a i | 1 ] serious difficulty would have been the result. ‘‘Peace, however, was restored i | without bloodshed. The offender made the proper apology, paid a heavy i | i fine for his rashness, and the honorable but belligerent court adjourned. ” rl at Col. Foster lived in elegant style, and entertained in a princely man- | | ner. This, with his vivacity, wit and brillant conversation, made him a universal favorite in society. During the last twenty years of his life, he gaye the greater part of his attention to political matters, into which he entered with great spirit. He was twice elected to the United States Ta senate, the first time in 1837, to fill out the unexpired term of Felix vi i! Grundy. He was again chosen in 1843, but resigned two years later. | | In 1845 he was the Whig candidate for governor, but was defeated by A. Hel V. Brown, by a small majority. He then withdrew from active life, and Nail died in 1854. ert Francis B. Fogg, for many years a partner of the above, was a native | | ii of Connecticut, where he received a thorough literary education, and also Hl prepared himself for his chosen profession. He then, in 1818, came to | Tennessee and located at Columbia, but in less than a year removed to Nashville, where he spent the remainder of a long life. ‘Upon his settle- ment in Tennessee he commenced the practice of law which he pursued with unremitting diligence for half a century, until age and disease dis- qualified him for labor. It is no disparagement to his many distin- guished contemporaries in the profession during that long and eventful period to say that he had few rivals and no superiors. His success was eminent. He commanded the confidence of the community in a remark- able degree. Toa mind naturally strong and vigorous he united rare industry, and with original scholarship of a high order he was able to Say URES RRR : a SE ae ee ee = 5 oieamnianndaherees PSsHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 399 amass stores of learning on all subjects. He possessed a wonderful memory, by which he could recall cases and incidents‘that most others had forgotten. He was familiar not only with the history of the law, but with the history of this and other countries. Mr. Fogg was not ambitious for office and never sought promotion, but in 1834 he was, by the voluntary action of the community, elected a member of the Constitu- tional Convention and took a prominent part in its deliberations. In 1851—52 he was elected to the State Senate from Davidson County and aided efficiently in inaugurating the system of internal improvements which has done so much for the State.” “It is impossible now to tell how many of the statutes that adorn our code and measure and regulate the rights of persons and property, he was the author of. It was the habit of Legislatures to call upon him on all occasions for aid in the preparation of bills.’’* No member of the Nashville bar is remembered with a feeling of greater kindliness and respect than Josephus C. Guild. Of his early professional life he has given many interesting incidents in his “Old Times in Tennessee,”’ which are told in his inimitable style. He was a man of strong and vigorous intellect, and at the bar, especially before a jury, he had but few equals. He was not a student of books nov a fin- ished scholar, but was a close observer of human nature and possessed a fund of practical knowledge which was always ready for use. As a judge he was distinguished for his strong sense of justice and his deep love of natural equity, which made suitors feel that their causes would be impartially tried. There was also a natural cheerfulness and liveliness of his disposition which would crop out even in the midst of the decorum of the bench, and a lively sally of wit or a gleam of humor from him often brightened the otherwise dull tedium of legal procedure. Judge Guild began the practice of law in 1822, in Sumner County, where he remained until the close of the civil war. He was three times elected to the House of Representatives, and twice to the State Senate, was a presi- dential elector for James K. Polk in 1844 and for Franklin Pierce in 1852; was elected chancellor for the Seventh Chancery Division in 1860, and in 1870 was made judge of the law court of Nashville, which position he held until the abolition of the court in 1878. He died January 8 1883, after sixty years of active professional life. Bailie Peyton, a contemporary and intimate personal friend of Judge Guild, was associated with him in his early practice. He was born in Sumner County in 1803. At the age of twenty-one he was admitted to € the bar, and soon after formed a partnership with Henry A. Wise, a *The above extracts are taken from the resolutions passed by the bar at his death in April, 1880. a AE Te eI = : Se ERE Ee Ber «i AH a SS ET LT nee ee a E — * eee nk merePee Fy : ie | 4 , v4 Pa i 4.00 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. teh a Bab wit rouns’ Iso just entering upon the practice of law. Being of sim- opt aha i i young man, aiso jus g updo: mE g TEA i ilar disposition they at once became intimate friends, but neither pos- | if i sessed much taste for the arduous duties of the profession, and soon drifted into the more congenial sphere of politics. The partnership con- tinued for two years, when the latter returned to his native State. His subsequent Career ig familiar to all students of history. Peyton did not rank very high as alawyer, but as a political speaker he had few supe- riors, possessing in a high degree that peculiar quality known as per- He was elected to Congress on the Whig ticket when aL danevatins ee (© aid mr eee es Soc Soe ee ia atid nadie ine Ses ee = sonal magnetism. barely thirty years of age, and was twice returned, serving from 1833 to 1839. He was appointed United States District Attorney at New Orleans by President Taylor, and soon after was sent as minister to Chili. He afterward practiced law for a time in California, but later returned to his old home at Gallatin, where he died in 1878. For several years one of the leading law firms in Nashville was com- posed of Edwin H. and Andrew Ewing, sons of Nathan Ewing and grand- ap or myer tor tear er he ne ee gn ae gg oy ianalialililinan centssuiiiaacsinds = <= — : 3 — = - : ie 2 a Ee eg a ee tt PEK ong moe ost Reteeee wr . =e: as ai eG PCRS ac SES — ~ - a oe A ans! gee ao wigs sons of Andrew Ewing, the first clerk of the Davidson County Court. Edwin H. Ewing graduated at the Nashville University in 1827, and was admitted to the bar in 1831. He then formed a partnership with James Grundy, which continued until 183%, when he associated himself with his younger brother. For a number of years he took an active interest in polities, serving one term in the State Legislature and one term in Congress. Meanwhile he kept up the practice of law, and added to his already high reputation. He sat frequently upon the bench of the su- preme court as special judge, and delivered opinions in several important cases. In 1851 the partnership with his brother was dissolved, and he did but little practice thereafter until the close of the war, at which time he resumed his professional labors and has only recently entirely with- TP egg TEE ATM Sita TR cS A PR i aa > ke Si Sage sas an drawn from active life. Andrew Ewing also received a collegiate education and, in point of ability, was not inferior to his brother. He was an easy, graceful and persuasive speaker, a thorough and diligent student, and an energetic and active advocate. While in partnership he performed the law prac- tice, leaving the chancery business to his associate. He made a careful study of each case, but he was too thorougly imbued with a knowledge § i . § ~ i ; Rt a : ; h ik t ‘ f it Hea i , ¥ : ' j é : Det © eibe ee Th way: Wine ¥ ? Hh ve : j = tiie a ' oa ti | ; (he fs > ie i : 1 faa | ga 4 Eig os tj Hy : ae & (hole Be ah ee st 4 he ise ie ia A if {4a at hi af ay of the elements and principles of law to be classed as a mere case lawyer. While giving diligent attention to professional business he also mingled eonsiderably in the politics of the day as a speaker and counselor. While his brother was a Whig he was a moderate Democrat, and in 1849 was elected to Congress in the face of a strong opposition. He was appointed one of a permanent court-martial of lawyers by the Confederate Govern- ee = ee eeHISTORY OF TENNESSEER. 40] ment in 1862, and two years later died from exposure and overwork Atlanta, Ga. One of the best educated and most brilliant men ever at the bar in at Tennessee was Return J. Meigs, who practiced law for many years in Athens, McMinn County, and afterward removed to Nashville. Te was the author of a voluminous digest of the judicial decisions of the State and was one of the compilers of a ‘Code of Tennessee.”’ He was not only learned in the law, but in ancient and modern languages, and was a comparative philologist of no ordinary attainments. Indeed, there seemed to be no branch of human knowledge with which he was not in some de- gree familiar. At the beginning of the war, being a strong Union man, he was compelled to leave Nashville, and he afterward made his home in Washington, where, for a number of years, he held a responsible posi- tion under the Governmeut. William T. Haskell, at one time a prominent member of the bar of Tennessee, was almost diametrically opposite in character to Meigs. He was a brilliant and effective speaker, possessing a mind of much quick- ness and energy, and an imagination of exceeding fertility. He had great powers of ridicule, and, when opportunity afforded, could use in- vective with crushing effect. He was not, however, a thorough and dili- gent student, and was somewhat too fond of social pleasure to attain to that high rank to which, with proper application, his talents would have raised him. Spencer Jarnagin, a student at law under Hugh L. White, was born tion in his profession. He was a plain unimaginative man with a clear head and sound judgment. His language was simple, well chosen and straightforward, and he rarely indulged in impassioned flights of oratory, yet he never failed to elicit the closest attention from his hearers. His success as a Jury lawyer has rarely been excelled, and litigants always felt confident of success when they had secured him to advocate their cause. One of the leading lawyers in the western division of the State for many years was Milton Brown, a native of Ohio, who located in Tennes- see in early manhood. During his long practice in'the various courts of the State he maintained a high reputation for industry, probity and legal acumen, and succeeded in accumulating an ample fortune. His knowledge of the law was full and accurate, his reasoning powers much rx 2) above mediocrity, and his astuteness and skill in the management of cases were universally acknowledged. John A. Nooe was at one time prominently identified with the Mem- phis bar. He was a man of high character, mild, affable, benignant and se Spe gba ee aE pea ~ a comme Sg pT IT FE LT MS TN = = aaa EET ReenaPe fi G | | Bi Hh ian / r r a MmAT ANT NO ® ee A()2 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. NHBUIE of unimpeachable integrity. He was thoroughly well read in the law, and could effectively apply the learning w hich he had acquired. AlI- though he always expr essed himself with fluency and in elegant language, his diffidence in public was a serious drawback upon his complete suc- cess as a forensic advocate. it Neill Smith Brown, the thirteenth governor of Tennessee, was a native mie Mi of Giles County and a descendant of Scotch Presbyterians. His parents ye aa = a oz - =~ a 7 a = . 4 os b Pea sea Silos 5c =F z Pini oS rin ee ee a sea eoeataiet ae * =< POA POTTS, ea mat MAE Ae were poor, and unable to give him more than the rudiments of an educa- Pree tion. At the age of seventeen he was thrown upon his own resources, as and took to teaching school to enable him to secure a more thorough Ss estpinneeteentiiectieersreseecoopee SSeS eS TET Ses Se teehee ~~ education. After completing a college course he studied law, and began the practice at Matagorda, Tex., then a part of Mexico. Not finding the att society congenial, he soon after returned to his native State, where he OTe te oh na RR AS Ta POD | a took an active part in politics until the beginning of the war, serving as Sah ~ ERTS | a member of the General Assembly, governor, minister to Russia, and as presidential elector on the Whig ticket in 1856. His career as a lawyer began in 1839, and except for his frequent diversion in the field of poli- ei sats HE tics, he practiced his profession for a period of fifty years. It could not My il perhaps be said that his legal acquirements were the ae comprehensive, | or that in grasp of thought and aggressive force of character he was not excelled, but his native talents were of a high order, and had been well cultivated for the part he essayed in life, and they won for him just and deserved distinction. John Trimble, a son of James Trimble, who has been previously men- Het tioned, attained a high degree of. eminence in the profession. At the age of twenty-four he was elected attorney-general for the Nashville Dis- oo trict, a position which he held for six years. In 1843 he was elected a member of the lower house of the General Assembly, and two years later to the Senate. He refused a renomination, and for the next few years devoted himself to his professional labors, acquiring a large practice. In 1859 he again entered politics, being elected to the State Senate. He j 7 ) | Hert was a stanch Union man, and during the extra session of 1861 did all in his power to defeat the passage of the ordinances of secession. In 1862 | : ail he was commissioned United States district attorney, which office he held for two years. In 1865 he was again elected to the State Senate, Congress. He had a taste for literary pursuits, which at times became SDE rp eg eens | { ' ' a | and two years afterward was chosen to represent his district in the XL f ; . ae : ai almost a passion, and for several years of his life he devoted himself i t WA almost entirely to study. Had he been ambitious to rise either in his : profession or in the political world, he could have attained to the highest position in either. nae eee ae"HISTORY OF TENNESSER. 403 Judge Thomas L. Williams, for a long time chancellor of East Ten- nessee, was one of the most highly respected members of the profession who ever practiced in the courts of the State. He was a man of strone constitution and of great energy and force. He scorned all Bernas self-indulgence, and his powers of endurance seemed almost unlimited. He held thirty-eight courts in nineteen different counties in a year. and in going from one point to another had to travel over rough mountain roads, at times almost impassable. His judicial career presents an ex- ample of industry and adherence to official duty rarely excelled. Although he possessed highly respectable attainments in his profession, he was not a learned lawyer nor an accomplished scholar; but he pos- sessed in an eminent degree that highest and most valuable of all intel- lectual gifts, strong, vigorous, practical, common sense. He retired from the chancellorship in 1854, and died at Nashville, December 2, 1856. Thomas C. Lyon, of the Knoxville bar, was a native of Roane Coun- ty, born in 1810. He enjoyed the reputation of an able and successful lawyer, and a thorough and profound jurist. He was a man of fine sensibilities and a high sense of honor. He sat Irequently upon the supreme bench as a special judge, and his opinions are generally re- garded as not inferior to those of the most learned jurists. He was a fine linguist and an accomplished scholar, with considerable taste for poetical composition. When he was quite young his father removed to Knox- ville, where he received his education, graduating from Hast Tennessee College. During the Mexican war he served on the staff of Gen. Wool, with the rank of major. He died in Richmond, Va., October 1, 1864. William H. Sneed, another prominent member of the Knoxville bar, was born in Davidson County in 1812, and soon after attaining his majority began the practice of law at Murfreesboro. He early at- tained a high standing, which he fully maintained to the end of his life. In 1843 he was chosen to the State Senate, and soon after the expiration of his term of office married the only daughter of Alexander Williams, of Greeneville, where he then located, and in partnership with Robert J. McKinney practiced his profession for about a year. In 1845 he re- moved to Knoxville, where he at once took a prominent position, and in 1855 was elected to represent his district in Congress. He died at his home in 1869. Horace Maynard, for many years a leading lawyer and politician of East Tennessee, was born in Massachusetts in 1814. He received his early education in Charleston, S. C., but graduated from Amherst Col- lege in 1838. He soon after removed to East Tennessee, locating at Knoxville, where he was employed as a professor in the University of= a i SAP nome mE SRR XN eas Tease Se I a a SS ee = SE i i RB 404 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. East Tennessee until 1844. He then entered upon the practice of law and soon was recognized as one of the leading attorneys in that division of the State. In 1857 he took his seat as a member of the XXXV Congress, and continued as a member of that body until the expiration of the XLIII Congress, with the exception of from 1863 to 1865, when he was attorney-general of Tennessee. Having with Andrew John- son espoused the principles of the Republican party, he remained faithful to them. He served during the greater portion of President Hayes’ administration as minister to Turkey, and also for a short time as Post- master-General. He was aman of distinguished ability, was a forcible and clear speaker and always entertaining. He died May 3, 1882. At the close of the civil war, the supreme court was reorganized with Samuel Milligan, J. O. Shackleford and Alvin Hawkins, as judges appointed by the governor. Frequent changes occasioned by resignation occurred, until the adoption of the new constitution in 1870. Samuel Milligan was born in Greene County, Tenn., “of poor but respectable parents.” His father was unable to give him a better educa- tion than could be obtained at an old field school; but being possessed of a well balanced and indomitable energy he determined to take a college course. In this he was successful and graduated from Tusculum College. He studied law with Robert J. McKinney, but before begin- ning practice he was elected to the General Assembly, serving two terms. He was admitted to the bar in 1846, but soon after joined the army and served as a major in the Mexican war. After his return home he practiced his profession until the civil war. In 1868 he resigned his seat upon the supreme bench, and was made one of the judges of the court of claims at Washington, a position he held until his deathin 1874. He was an able advocate, and an impartial and incorruptible judge. Alvin Hawkins entered the profession of the law as a student under Judge Totten at the age of nineteen. About two years later he located at Camden, Benton County, where he remained only a short time, when he returned to Huntington. In 1854 he was chosen to represent his county in the General Assembly, and in 1862 was elected to Congress but did not take his seat. He remained loyal to the Union, however, and in 1864 was appointed United States District Attorney for West Tennes- see, by President Lincoln, a position which he resigned the following year to accept a seat upon the Supreme Bench. As an advocate he has few superiors, and is especially strong before a jury. He is an effective speaker at all times, and possesses oratorical powers of a high order. His native talents are of a high order and have been well cultivated, and they have won for him just and deserved distinction.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 4()5 James O. Shackleford was a native of Kentucky, but at an early ace - if a oO = removed with his parents to Missouri. During his early manhood he was engaged in trapping in New Mexico and other parts of the Southwest. After his return he studied law and began practice at Dover, Stewart County. Later he removed to Clarksville, and formed a partnership with James Rivers, with whom he practiced fora time. He afterward was associated with Gustay A. Henry, continuing until the beginning of the civil war. During that struggle he espoused the Union cause, yet he always sympathized with the misfortunes of his neighbors on fine other side, and through his influence prevented much suffering. In 1865, with Hawkins and Milligan, he was placed upon the supreme bench by ap- pointment of Goy. Brownlow. He resigned in 1867, but was reappointed the following year. In 1869 he resumed the practice of his profession in Nashville: there he continued until about’1875, when he moved to Colorado. Judge Shackleford was a man of good ability and consider- able learning. He was not an eloquent speaker, but possessed reasoning powers of a high order. ; Andrew Mclain, one of the supreme judges elected in 1869, was born in Smith County and began his career as a lawyer at Carthage. He soon became one of the leading attorneys in that county and was made judge of the circuit court. After his retirement from the supreme bench in 1870 he practiced law in Nashville until February, 1882, when he received the appointment to the office of United States District Attorney. Upon the change in the administration of the Federal Government in 1885 he was retired, and now resides in San Diego, Cal. He is well read in his profession, but is not a successful advocate, being somewhat lacking in tact and skill. He is aman, however, of unquestioned integ- rity, and of the strictest moral rectitude. George Andrews was born in Putney, Vt., in 1826. His boyhood was spent in his native State, in western New York and in Michigan. He studied law in Detroit, where he was admitted to the bar in 1857, and continued to practice his profession until 1865, when he came to Ten- nessee. In December, 1868, he was appointed by Gov. Brownlow a judge of the supreme court, to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Judge Milligan. He was elected to the same position at the judicial elec- tion in May, 1869, and continued upon the bench until the adoption of the new constitution in 1870. In December, 1871, he was appointed. United States District Attorney for the eastern district of Tennessee, which position he continued to hold until his resignation in February, 1879. Since that time he has practiced his profession in Knoxville; since January 1, 1881, in partnership with J. M. Thornburgh.ne ear cecewil or naam nmr eit gM ze: mee inns Rr 3 Sard mapeeeashetsnmeneres ee a SOR i ti ah A acl ig yas Paskson. sg saute pcan ge ee cee SEN ™ F “ se ee el See = : a —— .s * Se SSC eee : no bsipiaoma aE ies j ~ “ . 3 gia asi trea mh cle s oa eu a eB alent aiB tg lg 4d aera: * ® rm Ee Vig i mempenin oe, RS Cf end sae NaEIFS mn = ree o oe = $ = ene Bares : ete ~ = — tk ee — = = = . a icine hi we ee ee OS i ar == f NE ea A ERE Na hm Ret i mt AR en of ome ee = rs : ee . = — pense <= eee te = id Sa ie a SRS a meget Sadodes. cae pa RO aT rs yt neers aaa ie = = sh che=s in| ac ton as a - 7 Set eee s t = : : x eeeeined see ae a ngage i PRI -— ~ es erga. i eee ete HAE ue ‘| H 14 ie eee ae | saris ee RGSS KITES ha SERENE Cle illo a, si pg aie 2 aabencnn ; aa a soccmeteanias toate 4 Sn RL a eS 406 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Henry Gratton Smith, the successor of Judge Hawkins upon the su- preme bench, was for a long time a distinguished member of . the bar of Tennessee. His entire career was marked by a love of truth and upright- ness, a scrupulous fairness toward adversary counsel and parties, and a laborious, painstaking attention to ascertain the true principle of law. It could not be claimed for him, perhaps, that he had no superiors in the profession, yet his learning and ability were decidedly above mediocrity. During the civil war he remained loyal to the National Government, yet he conducted himself with such rare discretion and dignity as to win the esteem of even his enemies. His opinions and judgments as they are found in the official reports attest to his ability and his devotion to the duties of his high office. Horace H. Harrison was born in Lebanon, Wilson County, August 7, 1829. In 1841 the family removed to McMinnville, having meanwhile resided in Sumner and Robertson Counties. The father died in 1845, leaving young Harrison, at the age of fifteen, the sole support of his mother, Up to that time he had received a liberal education, but this event prevented him from completing his college course. He entered the office of the county clerk, and during the next seven years served in that office, the office of the clerk and master of the chancery court, and that of the register of deeds. In 1853 he was elected a director of the Mc- Minnville & Manchester Railroad, and two years later began the prac- tice of law in the Mountain Circuit, where he enjoyed a large practice from the first. In 1859 he removed to Nashville. In 1862 he was ap- pointed clerk of the Federal courts for Middle Tennessee. August 15, 1863, he was commissioned United States District Attorney, a position he held until 1866. He was then appointed chancellor by Brownlow, and the following year was elected to the supreme bench. In 1872 he was again appointed United States District Attorney, and afterward was elected to Congress from the Nashville District. At the end of his time he resumed the practice of law, continuing until his death, which occurred December 20, 1885. Judge Harrison was able and scholarly, and even his political opponents always conceded his purity and honesty. Asa speaker and writer he was noted for clearness of statement and earnest- ness of manner. Robert McFarland was for many years an able member of the East Tennessee bar, ranking with Reese and McKinney. He was a born law- yer and a judge by nature. He had a logical mind, patient of investi- gation and trained by reflection rather than much reading. He was singularly free from prejudices, and if as a judge he was not famed for erudition, he fully compensated for its absence by an accurate discrimin-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 407 ation, sound judgment and rare practical wisdom. His Opinions are not distinguished for beauty of style or wealth of illustration, but they are al- ways clear and convincing. In correctness of decision, the highest test of asupreme judge, he had no superior. He was notas learned a lawyer as Reese, nor as exact and precise as McKinney, but in clearness of per- ception, soundness of judgment and correctness of decision he rivalled either*. He served upon the supreme bench for a period of eleven years, retiring on account of failing health in December, 1882. He died in 1884. Thomas A. R. Nelson, one of the supreme judges elected in 1870, was a native of Roane County, Tenn. He graduated from East Tennes- see College in 1828, and was admitted to the bar before he attained his majority. He was one of the most brilliant and versatile of men and soon won his way to distinction. He figured quite prominently in poli- tics, and while in Congress delivered a speech which was published in full by the London Times, and which that paper pronounced to be ‘‘one of the finest forensic efforts of modern American lawgivers.” His reasoning powers were of a very high order, his imagination uncommonly fertile, and his power of satire unexcelled. During all the years of his long life, Oo while not engaged’in politics, he was vigorously prosecuting his profes- sional labors, and in everything he undertook he was earnest, laborious and indefatigable. During his short term of seryice asa supreme judge Oo he delivered a number of opinions which give evidence of his eminent ability as a jurist. John Louis Taylor Sneed, one of the six supreme judges elected un- der the revised constitution in 1870, is a native of North Carolina. His mother died when he was quite a child and hé was taken in charge and educated by his uncle, then living in Granville County, N. C., but who soon after removed to West Tennessee. There young Sneed, after re- celying an academic education, began the study of law with Y. D. Barry. In 1843 he settled in Memphis for the practice of his profession, and two years later he was elected to the General Assembly. In 1846 and 1847 he was a captain of volunteers in the Mexican war, and served with dis- tinction until its close. In 1851 he was elected attorney-general of the Memphis Judicial District, but resigned three years later to become a candidate for the office of attorney-general of Tennessee. He was elected and held the office for five years, during which time he published the five volumes of reports known as Sneed’s Reports. After his retirement from that office he became a candidate for Congress on the Whig ticket, but was defeated, the district being overwhelmingly Democratic. He then re- *Tribute to his memory from the Supreme Court Bar of East Tennessee. Skil Bet pan aePAG aA Eee te ghee we oe Serer = 7 + rest i ee : = =e ae | ~ Fe a aS feet ss PALE we ees Rites ees AP A + ian ARAM ARTE ile Tn A cae 27a TOE Ee ae ~ > aval Ry PI See a Gk: PE Sg = REE ~ = < ee >: ” SALTER ; 5 . — ee eee : cee eer ty eee ete onary a Wisi: Ros ee ee 7 -- we howe ye hc abies ee aT oes - i - : ; wee ae : En ~ a Silo etme are ect cas eaiadga: \apivies- cease Sedan a Mien rc rer 2 Sendai ‘ pari ae eek de pg Demme Sienna Slimnen Sette cent eae ee a . er =a ute ’ oa Ene eres = ee ee ~ Ce EN eae tee ar Tce Te 2c haps | ge oe oem algaledapheett m nee Sao ae os ag AOE Als ‘ : ‘ Bat fe ke e F rea ip eve ‘ Vey : } eet Coys ; reid) ©: She pas ; ; iMs ae iM Tele a ee. WETS ae ei t a ‘eo i} i apsiis Rohs we , i i ; in z +4 & ‘ ‘a qt tee , FF at 1 ie & mre |b 1 (PER Nt boas eis Po i Li 4 oer: yl ead at : jie itt) ¢ (ee ea ‘ ee eS +f : ; Bs ee q \ pu pte Te ban Aad ites pee re Hj ; ef ‘ yeas 15 WY j : . Has ® hee Ed ; a4 = hae # % & | see ‘ Lie i ae ne rie oat ¢ mia) hat ipa | hain th al ‘ Lali ee b ae ea t 3 re . . | i i pee { mat 5 aathy ys ay it4 Wig) ane Peas Le via ‘ * y, | ; ipaid ‘ Nia ; ia. a Zh ' | mee Se eng ea mt _ = a . h aia ij a. 4 om ——= = — - x : - 4 | a ——« 5 % — = =; = = = ~ oul | 4 = te ==S ee ios ‘ a = ~ = = ——— ve <= . | A = = eee — SSS te Pade pit Sr eee >: sae ~ eee eons — = \ ee nem Sse = = % + Sa Sa ee Nd : = = < ere wit oh Fiatiare 2 Fn Sate rei = = ~~ a : : ei . . " = ne . S “ s is ‘ 4 er aa ase ings ne wales a amore te SEI SMe : " on — : | = Sn - : os oe " " 7 PE me ee ee wn n= ER ee gra eer a ladanaiaaiUiaai sie raliiek rr ‘ eae = a - a ; . ——e = — j . oa - - : aoe 7 ~ = 2 . sei a vereuene i ‘ eee Ses a Shoei Se ee - a - 7 Saeenre eae 2 ae = = : " is : <== = oe : " PTLD te : eae F, c F - saitaia weep —* = enters ee Se SEITE EAE a_i “ ante ~ os fT nee ma Se ES Soe as SiG ME i | LY SION I I Pai ART CL SRE ES ee - = a oS - = — = we = een ee = aie t+ = STI he ~ : TENG ER e - pe ETA SARA ss SO I RR TEE Ea 22S > Spe MN vy at wee ee <3 - a Laas c oe ; he =i sii ipa cs Sa ae al cata Baoan z = ene = xz see at ‘ ere = — eer Si RS LT eh OEE: iy Sag Sai Te SPENCE ILE TEARS AMES GE eR Wg athe Lee ae Ts HSE ee tie ee LL een EE neta — 408 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. turned to the practice of law and was so engaged when the civil war be- gan. A Union man at first, like many others, he was made a rebel “by the tramp of an invading army,” and although he never held office in the Confederate Army, yet he was thoroughly identified with its interests, and devoted to its cause. On his retirement from the supreme bench in 1878 a feeling of general regret was expressed. He afterward served as judge of the court of arbitration and also of the court of referees. Asa judge he was patient, courteous, discriminately just and capable. In careful consideration, scholarly composition, lucidity of argument and thorough interpretation of the law, his opinions compare favorably with any of his predecessors. He is an especally brilliant speaker, and a forcible and ready orator. Personally he is very popular, being a man of commanding presence, easy and graceful in his manners, and possess- ing rare conversational powers. Alfred Osborne Pope Nicholson, the first chief justice under the con- stitution of 1870, was born in Williamson County, Tenn, in 1808. He received a collegiate education, graduating from the University of North Carolina in 1827. He then began the study of medicine, but soon abandoned it for the law, and was licensed to practice in 1831. The fol- lowing year he became the editor of the Western Mercury, at’ Columbia. From that time until the war he was too thoroughly engrossed in politics to achieve very great success at the bar, although he combined in a re- markable degree the application and acumen of the jurist and the sagacity of the politician. He was, however, too retiring in his disposition and by nature too prudent and timid to be a great leader; yet he was fre- quently elected to office, serving three terms in the lower house of the General Assembly and one term in the State Senate. In 1840 he was appointed to fill out the unexpired term of Felix Grundy in the United States Senate, and was elected to represent the State in that body for the term beginning in December, 1859. Upon the secesston of the Southern States he resigned his seat, and was not again in office until elected to the bench of the supreme court. Although he was perhaps not the peer of Haywood and some others of the profession in the depth and grasp of his intellect, yet he possessed the power of concentration to a high de- gree, and had the faculty of elucidating a subject and bringing forth great results from his cool and deliberate judgment. Whether at the bar, on the bench, or in political life, he always gaye his views in such plain words that the humblest hearer could understand them. William Frierson Cooper, at one time a partner of Judge Nicholson, as a chancery lawyer, jurist and thorough literary scholar, has no supe- rior in the State. During his practice of the law he devoted himself al-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 409 most exclusively to the chancery department, which, with his experience of nearly seven years as chancellor, has made him the leading authority in the State in that branch of jurisprudence. His decisions while upon the bench of the chancery court have been published in three volumes, and are exceedingly valuable. His knowledge of law in other depart- ments is also thorough and extensive. With Return J. Meigs he pre- pared the present ‘‘Code of Tennessee,” and afterward edited forty volumes of the ‘‘Tennessee Reports” upon their republication. He has also re- edited an edition of “Daniels’ Chancery Practice,” bringing down the references and annotations to the present time. January 1, 1879, he took his seat upon the bench of the supreme court, and has since discharged the duties of the office with that fidelity and ability which has character- ized him in all his official and professional relations. Peter Turney received his knowledge of the law under the direction of his father, the late Hopkins L. Turney, and was admitted to the bar in 1848, at the age of twenty-one years. Jor the first two or three years he obtained few cases, but after that time he did a good practice until the beginning of the civil war. He then entered the Confederate Army as colonel of the First Confederate Tennessee Regiment, in which posi- tion and elsewhere he made a gallant record during four years’ service. At the close of hostilities he resumed the practice of his profession, which he continued with success until 1870, when he took his seat upon the supreme bench. He is a man of great native ability and strong in- dividuality, is firm and positive in his opinions, and as a judge is not at all subject to the influence or domination of any other member of the court. He is perhaps not as widely read in his profession, nor in general literature, as some of his colleagues, yet his opinions are as generally accurate as those of any other judge. James W. Deaderick, the present chief justice of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, was born in Jonesborough, Washington County, in 1812. He received a thorough education, having attended Hast Tennesse Col- lege and Central College at Danville, Ky. He married before complet- ing his course at the latter school, and soon after, in 1833, began mer- chandising in what is now Hamblen County. Not being very successtul in that business, about 1842 he took up the study of law, and in due time was admitted to the bar of his native town. He there opened an office and continued to practice with reasonable success until the close of the civil war. In 1866 he removed to Bristol, and the following year to Knoxville, where he remained until his election to the supreme bench in 1870. Judge Deaderick, while not a learned jurist, is a man of fine practical sense, of sterling probity and of persistent energy. He is mod-4 410 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Hr est. even to diffidence, and his unobtrusive, kindly demeanor, united with | his uniform fairness, has won for him a host of friends among the mem- bers of the bar. | Thomas J. Freeman is a native of West Tennessee, having been born in Gibson County, in 1827. His early education was limited to the | country schools and the county academy, yet at the age of seventeen he " . 12 s Tend . , f : ACA | had completed a course of medical reading. Not finding that profession to his liking, he turned his attention to the law, and at the age of twenty- He at once opened an office in Trenton, one was admitted to the bar. where he practiced until 1861, when he removed to Haywood County. After the close of the war he removed to Brownsville, where he contin- ued to practice his profession until his elevation to the Supreme Bench in 1870. Judge Freeman has always been a close student not only in his profession but of general literature, and is considered one of the most broadly cultured men in the State. Hé possesses what may be depomi- F nated a metaphysical mind—reasons logically and, in general, accurately. thn al His written opinions are usually quite long, but are clearly stated. As | a lawyer he was eminently successful in practice. He was eritically CC epson SSPE NESSES eRiREERRNESES careful in the preparation of his eases and was a skillful and eloquent advocate and a thorough master of technical pleading. John B. Cooke, the suecessor of Judge McFarland upon the supreme bench, was appointed in 1883 to fill out the unexpired term of the latter. He is a-vresident of Chattanooga, and is a lawyer and jurist of excellent judgment and high ability. Morgan W. Brown, the successor of John McNairy as judge of the Federal court for the District of Tennessee, was a brother of William kL. oe a ates Brown, one of the judges of the supreme court. He was a man of con- siderable reading and correct literary taste, a fine miscellaneous writer, and was for some time editor of a Nashville paper. He was appointed to a seat upon the bench of the Federal court in 1834, and continued to hold that position until his death in 1853. West H. Humphreys, the successor of Judge Brown, was born in * tebe paens.e a —— Montgomery County, in 1805. Soon after preparing himself for the law, he located in Somerville, Fayette County, where he began his profes- sional career, and in a very short time rose to distinction. So great was his popularity that he was sent as a delegate to the Constitutional Con- vention of 1834, and the following year was elected to the General As- —————————————— “ sembly, in which body he occupied a prominent position. In 1839 he ee ee ae was elected attorney-general and reporter of the supreme court, and re- elected in 1844. From the date of his appointment to be judge of the Federal court, he held the position until the opening of the war, when he |HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 41] received a commission to the same office from the Confederate Govern- ment. After the war he returned to his practice and continued until within a few years of his death which occurred in October, 1882. — Hi was a man of large acquirements not only in his profession, but in gen- eral knowledge. He was industrious and painstaking in the preparation of his cases, and earnest and vehement in his advocacy. Asa judgehe was just, and exceedingly courteous to the bar and to all with whom hi came in contact. Connolly F. Trigg was appointed United States District Jud the District of Tennessee by President Lincoln, in July, 1862. He was Ce )] (x = a native of Virginia, where he received his education and where he prac- ticed law until near middle life. He then came to Tennessee and here spent several years of useful and successful toil in his protession, before and up to the war. During that trying period, although a Southerner in his sentiments and dearest relations, he clung to the Union with un- swerving devotion, and at the close of hostilities he was the sole Federal judge in Tennessee to administer and enforce the penal laws of the 1 United States. It was a time to test the courage and integrity of a jud: TO > to the utmost. ‘The excitement and animosities of the war had not yet begun to subside, and the courts were filled with proscription, confisca- tion and test-oath cases. It now lay in his power to revenge himself upon his former enemies, but “Judge Trigg, with the same undaunted courage that he displayed in turning his back on secession, now calmly and serenely opposed and drove from the temple of justice the spirit of hate and revenge. Indictments for treason, libels for confiscation and test-oaths all disappeared at his rebuke, and the people resumed their wonted callings with a cheerful confidence in the ample protection of the laws of the United States.” It has beén truly said that the State owes to Judge Trigg a debt of gratitude greater than to any other man who has exercised judicial functions within her boundaries. He was not a great man, nor was he an accomplished jurist, but he had an abiding faith in the rudimental truths of jurisprudence. and his decisions always bear the test of right and justice. John Baxter, a judge of the Federal Circuit Court, was a native of North Carolina, where he was reared upon the farm, and enjoyed only the educational advantages of the country schools of that sparsely settled State. At the age of twenty he began the study of law, and in due time was admitted to practice. He located in western North Carolina, where he immediately rose to prominence, and was several times elected to the General Assembly. In 1856 he removed to Knoxville, where he ever after made his home. He was appointed judge of the United States Cir-412 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. euit Court in 1877, and continued upon the bench until his death in 1886. “Gifted by nature with an intellect of extraordinary vigor and compre- hension, of untiring energy and diligence, he rose from the humblest and most adverse condition to commanding power and influence as an adyo- cate. When he came upon the Federal bench the massive proportions of his mind, the force and sweep of his faculties developed and strengthened like the trunk of a giant oak, though the struggle of many years and the buffeting of many a storm enabled him to grapple with just confidence with the many new and difficult questions which confronted him. Law- yers soon found throughout the circuit that they had before them one who was the equal, if not the superior in many respects, of the greatest of them. and one who was determined to dispose of the cases in court with as much dispatch as possible. He elevated the tone of the bar; he put a. ae Gir Fiabe SMR ET nie SERS cat OL wa etter eee : H t eT rs Fe a ; a = ~ ‘5 wn ai Veh IT - - Pr is F r a ee mance [ aan . - —= me e ai ne oe SGT a ane a ere See ai * é a a Ti ee we wa 8 arn r : ‘ Lie PREG A TOM = eer ee a - SS ases . 5 ™ oe oa a te = ~ porno ene we , ee 2 7 = ry Tv © 1 . . not possess even the rudiments of an education. The wealthier members the Scotch, must have made eon- ~ of society, however, especially among st siderable advances, since even before the Revolution they were sending their sons to complete their education at Princeton. The constitution adopted at Halifax December 18, 1576, declared that « school or schools should be established, and ‘‘all useful learning shall fer F ee te = mS ee See Tel ain OT LT mH ee ae ea aye eo ee rd - SN eT te ae ie ea = ti 7 ; = iat . ; oe saaeiinnoae re - - =e ~ : ee i st Atha cst pee isin —— SS in ne =a 1 ee aoa at Seer < ps mae . ie SES Rr

. = —_ aa SSeS ar. : a == f ate, > oe = wo = ibe ‘ eames meet aan tne —— — = = 2 = a gee : _—— eae = <—= a ee a mn amcor, + Re Hx ‘ ener ARISES * : = s : >> Ae = eR = os = SIR eS arn he Re Se a Js = ecaphaay ‘i *y sha os auth " Des eigdiemyySalinemhin an aneesihcnahrerniiney seagate ctu = - Sta ne ns poe ee a . pi are . =< . a ‘ Sa means em meee acai caus coon ar Spa ae . . eee > i 2 fe eeteeiee as - a eile aaaiienaeeadiaiedeeead alia tebe age ete nanadit . a Se aaa cate cetae— “a wae ar ese ia : iit eee = eee SES TREE AAT eid ee sa : ——~ ‘ , eee Sees = eae tes ni GnSS . ee ep eee T Se ae - seis ee ee - ae NOSE RT Le She 6 Sere = Teo . se: fn ” ——= =— =— — = = E -~ - — sneerans SOT NT er - eh aeeennthngpennaet achseemneeataesinetiterpebalians Sn - = r— = ae = - " 5 = + > =. i r aa aHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 415 North Carolina and Tennessee was the college of New Jersey at Prince- ton, from which graduated Doak, Balch, Craighead and Perey other eminent educators and divines. The first school established in Tennessee, and, it is believed, the first west of the Alleghany Mountains, was Martin Academy, founded under an act ‘‘for the promotion of learning in the county of Washington,” passed by the General Assembly of North Carolina in 1785. Rev. Sam- uel Doak, mentioned above as the graduate of Princeton College, or as it was then known Nassau Hall, was the founder and first president. He was a member of the Franklin Assembly, and, it is said, was the author of the clause concerning education in the rejected constitution.* He was a man of great ability and force of character and of great learning, especially in the classics. His schoolhouse, a plain log building erected on his farm. stood a little west of the site afterward selected for Wash- ington 4 cademy. For many years it was the only, and for still more the principal, seat of classical education for the western country. During the same year but at the next session of the General Assem- bly, through the influence of Gen. Robertson, ‘‘an act for the promotion of learning in Davidson County” was passed. ev. Thomas Craighead, Hugh Williamson, Daniel Smith, William Polk, Anthony Bledsoe, Lard- ner Clarke, Ephraim McLean, Robert Hays and James Robertson were appointed trustees and ‘constituted a body politic under the name of the “President and Trustees of Davidson Academy.” Two hundred and forty acres of land adjoining the town of Nashville, on the Cumberland River, were granted by this act, which also encouraged private “bequests, gifts and purchases.” It was further provided that all the “ lands, tene- ments or hereditaments” vested in the trustees of the academy should be exempt from taxation for a period of ninety-nine years. At the first meeting of the trustees, which was held in August, 1786, Rey. Thomas Craighead was elected president, and at the next meeting it was decided that the school should be taught at ‘‘ Spring Hill Meeting House,” in the town of Haysborough, six miles east of Nashville. It was also ordered “that five pounds hard money, or the value thereof in other money, be paid for each scholar per annum.” The lands belonging to the institution for a number of years were rented out, and the proceeds *The clause referred to is as follows: Src. 32. All kinds of useful learning shall be encouraged by the commonwealth, that ts io say, the future Legislature shall erect before the year seventeen hundred and eighty-seven, one university, which shall be near the center of the State, and not in any city or town. And for endowing the same, there shall be appropriated such larfds as may be judged necessary, one-fourth of all the moneys arising from the surveys of land hereafter to be made, one half-penny upon every pound of inspected tobacco, forever; and if the fund thence arising shall be found insufficient, the Legislature shall provide for such additions as may be necessary, and if experience shall make it appear to be useful to the interest of learning in this State,a grammar school shall be erected in each county, and such sums paid by the public as shall enable the trustees to employ a “master or masters of approved morals and abilities. q{Ramsey.Sa oe OTE Ce iipeectiaes ae ae a ee : the, = - ~aemente STEN Fe PERE Sass i eS, TR eee EE a at SE a RE : eevee ~ ap a oii eet tea en ate reso mart aay ee ee = 5 PE ~ ae ae er % mr ae < cS on te ae analog el to ety ge See AE SE 2 La Seeing S 4 + x Oar geet er FSS re LS Sea Ks RES a Sa a { arenes, amen a ae ae Ps Sa ‘ STs nao. a) 4 Re ; t , aes) | ie be ; i} } G Pelee pee | iMby hae yl ; gare ine (eh dhe ; ea? iy ea a S15- | ia "eo i q { ince Peaulaes) 7 gi atii ree ; 2 | ire 4 joss 5, { Ehea Vat ies t Aoi. 3 Eee viet e : ie + tea } 4 Neg! f uf ae: ' fi 4 eo 4h \ in i ‘ wy 1? ck mee) gt ; t | hee | jek ei | rat ie hy ane se | eth ieee Va tie} ues Beet i ek y | i ae ; ia { : iy eth } } ay: i i Cat} ibd pay 4 ey i ij agile aa4 ; Ligit 14% i ped ‘eael} 4 a4} | a8 med te} : i } ’ } } i i Bat paey ; : eeat) e et , aa) } ' ‘ fan a raaia | qe | ; 5; , ‘ i 1% uae fh 4 i i | i ‘ : Mi easy il ; i Le i “ai ai 3 ‘ : aia ai i : ; i ; ian i j 7 i i te 4 jaar r ' i - if Fi \ { rt | De jj if ; +e | , an . ae cg ITI os a ‘Ss . eee) 416 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. used in-their improvement and in support of the academy. A ferry was established, which in time yielded an income of from $100 to $650 per annum. . One of the acts passed by the Legislature of the new State in April, 1796, added ten new trustees to the old board, and also appointed three persons to audit the accounts of the old trustees, with directions to insti- tute suit against the latter if they failed to comply with the law. The act provided further that the buildings of the academy should be erected ‘on the most convenient situation on the hill immediately above Nash- ville, and near the road leading to Buchanan’s Mill.” This act was not altogether satisfactory to the old board, and they refused to receive the new trustees and auditors; but the difficulty was settled after some delay, and they were finally admitted. Although some steps were taken toward the erection of a building as provided in the act, it was nearly ten years before it was completed. On October 25, 1803, an act was passed reor- ganizing the institution, and constituting it a college. Highteen trus- tees, of whom Thomas Craighead was the first mentioned, were constitut- ed ‘‘a body politic and corporate by the name of the Trustees of David- son College.” This act was repealed, however, on the 4th of the fol- lowing March, and thus ended the existence of Davidson College. At the session of the Territorial Assembly of 1794 two new colleges, Blount and Greeneville, were chartered. The bill incorporating the former institution was introduced on the 4th of September, by William Cocke, of Hawkins County, and on the 10th of the same month it -be- came a law. The act begins as follows: WHEREAS, The Legislature of this Territory are disposed to promote the happiness of the people at large, and especially of the rising generation, by instituting seminaries of education, where youth may be habituated to an amiable, moral and virtuous conduct, and accurately instructed in the various branches of useful science, and in the principles of ancient and modern languages; therefore SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Governor, Legislative Council and House of Repre- sentatives of the Territory of the United States of America, south of the River Ohio, That. the Rev. Samuel Carrick, president, and his Excellency, William Blount, the Hon. Dan- lel Smith, secretary of the Territory, the Hon. David Campbell, the Hon. Joseph Ander- son, Gen. John Sevier, Col. James White, Col. Alexander Kelley, Col. William Cocke, Willie Blount, Joseph Hamilton, Archibald Roane, Francis A. Ramsey, Charles McClung, George Roulstone, George McNutt, John Adair and Robert Houston, Esquires, shall be, and they are hereby declared to be a body politic and corporate by the name of the presi- dent and trustees of Blount College, in the vicinity of Knoxville. The college was declared opened to all denominations in the following words: And the trustees shall take effectual care that students of all denominations may and shall be admitted to the equal advantages of a liberal education, and to the emoluments and honors of the college, and that they shall receive a like fair, generous and equal treatment during their residence.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 41% This was the first non-sectarian college chartered in the United States. Col. James White donated the town square to the trustees for the use of the college, and a two-story frame building was erected by subseription near the northwest corner of the square.* . ; Rev. Samuel Carrick, the president, was a native of Pennsylvania. He removed in early life to Virginia, where he received his education and labored for many years. In 1787 he came to ‘Tennessee and preached from the artificial mound, near the confluence of the Holston and French Broad Rivers. The next year he returned, and henceforth encountered all the hardships and dangers of pioneer life. No authentic records of the first five years of the college exercises are in existence, but, according to tradition, great and general interest was taken in the institution, especially on examination occasions. ‘The written records of the college begin with the year 1804. Among the students at that time were C. C. Clay, William Carter, Thomas Cocke, Lemuel P. Montgomery and William K. Parker. The last named grad- uated on the 18th of October, 1806, the first student to graduate from the college. Females were admitted to the college at this time. The first named are those of Polly McClung, Barbara Blount, Jenny Arm- strong, Matty and Kitty Kain. As originally organized the college was dependent for its support solely upon the patronage of the public. Greeneville College was founded by Hezekiah Balch, a native of Maryland, but reared from early childhood in Mechlenburg County, ING C. He graduated at Princeton College and soon after located in Greene County, where he served as a eo-laborer in the church with Dr. Doak, of the adjoining county of Washington. But during nearly his entire life in the State he was harrassed by trials before presbyteries, synods and the general conference for some alleged heresies in the doctrines which he preached. So much of his time and money were spent in attendance upon these trials that his school was seriously injured, yet he patiently labored on until his death. The first female academy in the State was founded by Moses Fisk, at Hilham, in Overton County, and was known as Fisk’s Female Academy. Tt was chartered in 1806, and, according to the terms of the charter, Moses Fisk and Sampson Williams were to contribute 1,000 acres of land each toward the endowment of the institution. Fisk was a native of Massachusetts, a graduate of Harvard College and aman of great learning and of singular genius. In 1806 Congress passed an act of great importance to the educa- tional interests of Tennessee. It was entitled ‘‘an act. to authorize the *For the sketch of Blount College and the University of Tennessee this chapter is indebted to the address of Col. Mose White, delivered in 1879“IO IEE I oem ae ee sali sea einen IS Sih tam reer Me mere tape ee Tse ae aidan cre ee ae fe ene = ~ Fae an es Pits a ~ Ee a 3 Spe ws _ - Ty aa = : eet kei eee ee ars 5 aaa a '. me es : — " rae on, “ Se ET eo ee RT a aS ee a a eae Sa cea Tp Sag rel ns ee ee = = — “ae =) t j cur See eS a SRG a wes se id = 4 418 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. State of Tennessee to issue grants and perfect titles to certain lands therein described; and to settle the claims to the vacant and unappropri- ated lands within the same.” This act provided “that the State of Ten- nessee shall appropriate one hundred thousand acres, which shall be Jo- eated in one entire tract, within the limits of the lands reserved to the Cherokee Indians by an act of the State of North Carolina entitled ‘An act for opening the land office for the redemption of specie and other certificates, and discharging the arrears due to the army,’ passed in the year one thousand, seven hundred and eighty-three, and shall be for the use of two colleges, one in Hast and one in West Tennesee, to be estab- lished by the Legislature thereof. And one hundred thousand aeres in one tract within the limits last aforesaid for the use of academies, one in each county in said State to be established by the Legislature thereof; which said several tracts shall be located on lands to which the Indian title has been extinguished, and subject to the disposition of the Legisla- ture of the State; but shall not be granted nor sold for less than two dollars per acre, and the proceeds of the sales of the lands aforesaid shall be vested in funds for the respective uses aforesaid forever, and the State of Tennessee shall, moreover, in issuing grants and perfecting titles, Jocate six hundred and forty acres to every six miles square in the territory hereby ceded, where existing claims will allow the same, which shall be appropriated for the use of schools for the instruction of children forever.” The General Assembly, at the next session after the passage of this act, was flooded with memorials and petitions from the people of several counties, and from the president and trustees of each of the colleges in East Tennessee, praying for the grant and setting forth the advantages of their particular localities for the establishment of the college. Greene- ville College urged the numerous advantages peculiar to that institution, “its local situation, extensive library, philosophical apparatus, ample funds and other circumstances.” A resolution was received from the trustees of Blount College, expressing a willingness to unite their funds with those of the college to be established, provided it should be situated within two miles of Knoxville. The people of Blount County wished the college located at Marysville, while Hawkins County recommended Rog- erville. The question of locating the college, however, was not settled until the next session of the Legislature, when thirty persons were appointed trustees of Hast Tennessee College, “to be located on ten acres of land within two miles of Knoxville, conveyed in trust for the: use of said college by Moses White at a place called the Rocky or Poplar Spring.” The trustees, with the exception of seven, were apportionedHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 419 among the several counties of East Tenessee according to their popula- tion. ‘The seven trustees were selected from among men living in the vicinity of the college that they might have a more direct oversight of the institution. The following were the trustees appointed: For Hawkins County, Richard Mitchell and Andrew Galbreathy; Sullivan, John Rhea and James King; Greene, Augustus P. Fore and John Gass; Washine- ton, Mathew Stephenson and John Kennedy; Carter, George Damelde Jefferson, James Rice and Joseph Hamilton; Grainger, John Cocke and Maj. Lea; Cocke, Alexander Smith; Sevier, Hopkins Lacy; Blount, Jo- seph B. Lapsly and Dr. Robert Gant: Claiborne, William Graham; Anderson, Arthur Crozier; Roane, Thomas I. Vandyke; Knox, George W. Campbell, John Sevier and Thomas Emmerson. John Crozier, John Williams. Archibald Roane, Francis A. Ramsey, David Deaderick, George Doherty and John Lowry were appointed as the special trustees. Until buildings could be erected the trustees were authorized to use the buildings of Blount College, and the funds of that institution were declared incorporated with those of East Tennessee College. In 1806, after the passage by Congress of the act already referred to, the trustees of Davidson Academy petitioned the General Assembly for the endowment provided for in that act, and the academy being the only institution of the kind in West Tennessee* the petition was gra nted, and a body of nineteen trustees was incorporated under the name of the “Trustees of Cumberland College.” All the property, both personal and real, belonging to Davidson Academy was transferred to the college. At a meeting of the board of trustees held in July, 1807, it was decided to open the college for the reception of students on the 1st of the next Sep- tember, and books and apparatus to the amount of $1,000 were pur- chased. Rev. Thomas Craighead was continued as president of the ‘nstitution until October 24, 1809, when Dr. James Priestly was elected. The former continued one of the trustees till the autumn of 1813, when his connection with the college finally ceased. The management of the endowment fund proved to be a source of con- siderable difficulty. Various acts were passed providing for its invest- ment, none of which proved satisfactory in its results. In 1807 John Russell, James Park, Josiah Nichol, Edward Douglass, John Overton and William Tate were appointed commissioners to manage the fund, and were authorized ‘“‘to purchase stock in some reputable bank in the United States, and to pay over the dividends arising from the same to the col- leges.” Two years later Thomas McCorry, John Crozier and ‘Thomas Emmerson were appointed to loan out the money in the treasury belong- *What is now Middle Tennessee was then called West Tennessee.—— a a eet sbeiiivammecsss oe 7 cai cea Sn * } eek \ Oe ! af | 7 4h f " er is eis iZik # ia ; * : \ a } i , an av nye Ae iy i f ri iy iz (ie Ha We (Hat ¥ ree) } aiien fiat : rth iad . Cas Ve ii Rime ine: ace ptm SS ‘ ¥ Seco Spa - - =a ‘ es mene i MET GE OY sac Te = f so ———— a oo Se La eS BBs mI 3 = See Z =n See aN ARNE SS eR Sonn ee 5 ‘4 , 2S nn OR RE ST oa eS Le ee eg aE NE es Seance - a f ~ = ——————— . > amare — * | . = Rey a = ~ —— io a = 25a — = ; -" - ~ re . : és - ae . : ~ erent " cana = = Og Pe Sa re cee 5 ilar ras ae npn Sear : = a ae = : soncen ee : Saas tied ae eek ee 3 ; 4, rere = = a = pee ~ : Tea = mee ere ee. = a Sess et sea SRN 42() HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ing to the college. In 1813 an act was passed requiring all moneys col- lected for the use of Cumberland College to be turned over to the trus- tees of that institution, and by them to be invested either in Nashville bank stock or stock of the Bank of the State of Tennessee. The treasurer of Kast Tennessee was required to invest the money belonging to East Tennessee College in the same way. All the moneys loaned out to in- dividuals were called in. In 1806 the General Assembly, in compliance with the act of Con- gress, made provisions for county academies, and appointed five trustees for each county. These trustees were empowered ‘‘to fix upon and pur- chase a site, and to take and receive subscriptions for the same.” As the amount of funds available for each county was quite small, it was neces- sary that the people provide the buildings, and, also, in a great measure support the schools by subscriptions and donations. It was, conse- quently, several years before academies were established in all of the counties. Thus it is seen that after more than thirty years of dependent, and twenty years of independent, State government, no legislative action had been taken for the support and encouragement of common schools in Ten- nessee. Acts and grants for the benefit of academies and higher institu- tions of learning are numerous, but the idea of a system of popular edu- cation maintained at public expense does not seem to have entered the minds of legislators. In this may be found one of the most striking con- trasts between Vir ginia, North Carolina and other Southern solgeee and those of New Hae and a contrast which is yet apparent. So early a 1637, in all of the Puritan colonies it was ordered: “To the end that learning may not be buried in the graves of our forefathers, that every township after the Lord hath increased them to the number of fifty house- holders, shall appoint one to teach all children to write and read, and when any town shall be increased to the number of one hundred families, they shall set up a grammar school, the master thereof being able to in- struct youth so far as they may be fitted for the university.”” The estab- lishment of Harvard College followed soon after. In these colonies the fundamental idea was universal education, be- ginning with the common school and ending with the university. In North Carolina, Tennessee and the other Souther n States, the system was reversed. The college was first provided for, leaving the individual to prepare himself for receiv ing its benefits. The idea is expressed in the preamble to the act establishing the Univer sity of North Carolina: “ WHEREAS in all regulated governments it is the duty of every legisla- ture to consult the happiness of the rising generation, and endeavor to >. ea sHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 421 f+ them for an honorable discharge of the social duties of life by paying strict attention to their education, and, whereas, an university supported by permanent funds and well endowed would have the most direct tend- 59 ency to arrive at the above purpose; Be it enacted, ete. The eause for this difference in the educational systems was due partly to the dissimi- lar character of the people of the two sections, but more to the peculiar condition of society in each. In New England even in the earlier days there were but comparatively few slaves, and it was found that the laborer is valuable just in proportion to his knowledge and skill, and therefore that it is economy to educate him. This, with the democratic spirit in- herent in the colonists, produced the common school, the great preserver of democracy. In the Southern colonies the educational system was based upon ‘‘the theory that labor should be absolutely under control, and needed no intelligence; that culture, that knowledge of letters on the part of the slaves was especially dangerous to the system, that the only need of culture was on the part of the master, and this he was amply able to secure for himself. The intermediate class of persons—those who did not own slayes and who were not owned as slayes—occupied a most unfortunate position. The richer class had not the property interest in them, and did not consider them part of the same classification, because they were not slave owners.”* These general ideas, modified by local influences, shaped education for more than two centuries. It is true that systems of common schools were established in nearly every State, but in no instance did such a system flourish in company with the institution of slavery. The wealthy expected no advantage to their children from it, for they sent them to pay-schools or provided private tutors. This gave the public schools the name of pauper schools, and they were looked upon in that light alone The public sentiment in Virginia with regard to a State school system supported by taxation—and this senti- ment was common to the other Southern States—is clearly stated in the following extract from the autobiography of Thomas Jefferson. He was valled upon to formulate a plan of general education for that State. He says: ‘I accordingly prepared three bills, proposing three distinct grades of education, reaching all classes: First, elementary schools for all chil- ren generally, rich and poor; Second, colleges tor a middle degree of instruction, caleulated for the common purposes of life, and such as would be desirable for all who were in easy circumstances ; and third, an ultimate grade for teaching sciences generally, and in their highest de- gree. The first bill proposed to lay off every county in hundreds, or wards of a proper size and population for a school, in which reading, * Gen. John Eaton.Bien eee Eelltntas ee ee eal ag * BRAS eee RE nae eT : =. ~ \ » SM Tag > = . As AONE, — he : = ——— ee a ae ans. \ wesc pane ee a Prsteeh crates “ = ed Sea. ] Ca AR gman : = a ; Ps aac ae ea ae! Sng ee we: te bh we. } bt oat . r “- 2 Redcat ae athens a x 5 ‘ f te om = = fron ¢sceneseninaiaieioe - ‘7 - | eo iss : ees Ss ; eee =e . , = — ae aay wey c pe a AR CAE —— a ia a ae i a Saecer Mi t j ay i Hi fi , ii He it a 4 iif ee ee as a A me ie ~ yee 7 ¥ a a e Se SE eg NT pe a ease See a ae i nrg en oserarysinee print ye Bae OME Tage trate map te EY eS Papas Walon pg ae oe ice ae ee ae RRs RN AD? HISTORY OF TENNESSEE, writing and common arithmetic should be taught: and that the whole State should be divided into twenty-four districts, in each of which should be a school for classical learning, grammar, geography and the higher branches of numerical arithmetic. The second bill proposed to amend the constitution of William and Mary College, to enlarge its sphere of science, and to make it in fact a university. The third was for the es- Paplighinent of a library. Into the elementary bill they inserted a pro- vision which completely defeated it, for they left it to the court of each county to determine for itself when this act should be carried into execu- tion within their county. One provision of the bill was, that the expense of these schools was to be borne by the inhabitants of the county, every one in proportion to his general tax rate. This would throw on wealth the education of the poor, and the justices, being generally of the more wealthy class, were unwilling to incur the burden, and I believe it was not suffered to commence in a single county.” From this treatment of Mr. Jefferson’s wise plan it is seen that al- though the popularity of a common school system demanded its enact- ment, it was, so far as possible, rendered inoperative. This may be said to have been the attitude of Tennessee on this subject, from the organi- zation of the State to the civil war. But while the common schools were thus neglected and ignored, these other great agencies in the dissemination of knowledge and the formation of character, the private school seminary and university in a great measure supplied their place, and in many re- spects were superior to the best public schools. In fact, among the edu- cated class of the South there was, perhaps, a larger percentage who were thoroughly well educated, than inthe North. The church and the hustings also were potent.factors in education. Through their influence intelligent citizens were made though they did not, and many of them could not, read the newspapers. The first tax for educational purposes was levied under an act passed in 1816 “to provide for the education of orphans of those persons who. have died in the service of their country.” The act provided ‘‘that it shall be the duty of each county court in the State at each and every court atter the first day of January, 1816, to lay such a tax upon all tax- able property as shall be sufficient to educate the poor orphans who have no property to support and educate them and whose fathers were killed or have died in the service of their country in the late war.” The county court was also empowered ‘“‘to make such contract. with any person or per- sons as they may think best calculated for that purpose, to board and ed- ucate such children as far as to attain the art of reading, writing and arithmetic so far as the rule of three.”HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 492 In 1817 an act was passed to provide for the leasing of the school lands, laid off under the act of Congress in 1806. It was made the duty of each county court of the State to appoint as many commissioners Ae they might think necessary whose duty it was to lease out the school lands and receive and pay over the proceeds to the county trustee for the use of the schools in the respective counties. It was also made the duty of the commissioners, when sufficient funds had been received, ‘“‘to build a comfortable house for a common English school to be taught in, and to employ and pay a good teacher of English to instruct all children that may be sent thereto.” It was further provided that when $100 or more, for which there was no immediate use, had accumulated in the hands of the county trustee, that officer should loan the money out upon good se- curity. Some interest in popular education was aroused by the passage of this act, but it was of short duration, and only a few schools were estab- lished. Various acts, some of them local in their application, were passed during the next ten years, but no changes of great importance were made. B county were appointed, whose duty it was to appropriate “all the moneys r provision of an act passed in 1823. five commissioners for each A received by them to the education of the poor, either by establishing poor schools, or by paying the tuition of poor children in schools which are, or may be established in their respective counties.” From this act, establishing pauper schools, it is evident that no material advance toward a system of popular education had been made. The common school fund, collected from the lands set apart by the act of 1806, amounted to little better than nothing. In fact, from the report of a committee of which James’K. Polk was chairman, it is stated that only 22,705 acres of school land had been laid off, while according to the provision of the act, .grant- ing 640 acres for each thirty-six square miles, the number of acres loca- ted should have been nearly 450,000. In 1823 Congress repealed that portion of the act of 1806, fixing the price at which the land could be sold, and the General Assembly at its next session made provision to dis- pose of it at 124 cents per acre. The title to the Indian lands embracing what is now West Tennessee, was extinguished in 1818, but no provision was made for the support of schools. About 1830 there began what has been termed a revival in education which in spirit, if not in practice, extended throughout the United States. It was found that the schools were too dependent upon the teach- ers, or the presence or absence of a school man in the neighborhood; that the system lacked uniformity and effectiveness; that even in the most ad- ranced States, it was insufficient to meet the demands of the rapidily in- creasing population and to resist the influx of ignorance from the OldRose nn aes Fae iene So E eT PEL SOR ELE LS eee s St ‘ Hl oii aie rertaiae ne rm ~ —— —— . es <2 _ - “ ; teow caval SEE creek ied mt Seen tweet - eas ee PS ger 5 =aaee - = a ; = r OTE. - Pi . — . = . shemtianegie—omge-aiabeenmotinensit ye Tae han mx Tak Sec Seo TER PRT in EE naa tn tare -por bien = Tati a peas ati me ae Fy harem vain 2 PT et SSE Bes: en DEAE A a rg ie Se ee See _ “= = ee Sint eS oe ee aR KAO Zee Fine ET gs Oa A EASES: Seemed REET Se sce re creree scene nae ce om oe Un ease ~— a. A424 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. World. Eminent educators, Horace Mann, Dr. C. E. Stowe, and others, gaye the subject a thorough study, published books, and delivered ad- dresses until a conviction resulted that not only public welfare demanded a better educational machinery, but that it was the duty of the State to provide it. It resulted in establishing State supervision, graded schools, city and county supervision, normal schools and teacher’s institutes, ed- meational journals and literature, and perhaps the most important of all, the abolition of all rate bills, and the entire support of the schools by tax.* Many States adopted the new system, the efficiency of which soon became apparent. The spirit of this revival extended to Tennessee, and the popular- ity of some system of State education rendered legislation upon it imper- Avo! But although many of the best men in the State labored earnestly to secure an efficient system, the idea that free schools were established only for the benefit of the indigent portion of the community could not be eradicated, and failure was the result. As has been stated, the idea of a system of schools, as a measure of economy, for the benefit of the rich as well as the poor, could not under the then existing state of society become general. In 1827 the General Assembly passed an act creating a school fund, to be composed of all the capital and interest of the State bank, except one-half of the principal sum already received; the proceeds of the sales of the Hiwassee lands; all lands in the State which had been appropria- ted to the use of schools; all the vacant and unappropriated lands to which the State had, or might thereafter obtain title; all the rents and mesne profits of all the school lands which had accrued and had not al- ready been appropriated; all the funds denominated school or common school funds which had accrued from the sale of lands; the donations made by various parties to the State; all the stock owned by the State in the old bank of the State at Knoxville, amounting to 400 shares, and the property of all persons dying intestate and without legal heirs. No pro- vision was then made for applying this fund to its intended use. Two years later an act was passed establishing a system of public schools. Under this system the counties were divided into school districts of con- venient size, in each of which five trustees were elected, whose duty it was to meet at the court house on the first Saturday of June in each year, for the purpose of electing not less than five, nor more than seven “discreet and intelligent citizens” for common school commissioners. The trustees were also given full power to employ and dismiss teachers, and to judge of their qualifications, capacity and character. The com- *John Eaton.—Report of 1869.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 425 missioners were given control of all moneys for the use of schools. They were to divide the county into five districts, over each of which one one missioner was to exercise general supervision. ‘The interest arising from the school fund was to be distributed among the school districts in propor- tion to the number of children in each, between the years of five and fif- teen, but before any district should be entitled to its share it was com- pelled to provide a comfortable schoolhouse. It was made the duty of the president and directors of the State bank to equalize and distribute the fund. The commissioners were authorized to expend a sum not ex- ceeding $20 annually in the purchase of books, to be distributed to chil- dren whose parents were not able to provide them. The act also pro- vided that ‘it shall be the duty of the trustees to induce all children under the age of fifteen years to be sent to school, and no distinction shall be made between the rich and poor, but said school shall be open and free to all.”’ Although the system as presented in this act embraced many excellent features, it lacked several essentials. The funds were not suflicient to support the schools without resort to rate bills, and the houses were to be provided by private subscription. There were also too many executive officers and no controlling and supervising head, either for the counties or for the State. The system was established in several of the counties, and in a few it met with some success.. The commissioners for Maury County, in 1832, reported twenty-two teachers employed for terms rang- ing from one and one-half to eleven months with an average of four months. The wages ranged from $8 to $49 dollars per month, averaging ¢17. The total number of pupils enrolled during the year was 904. As the scholastic population of Maury County at that time exceeded 4 000, less than 25 per cent were enrolled in the public schools. The report from this county was one of the most satisfactory. The total funds which had been received for the support of academies up to this date amounted to $70,665.12. Thus the apparently munificent grant of 100,000 acres of land had yielded an aggregate of $1,139.76 to each county during a period of twenty-five years. While some of the counties had received the full amount, others had established no academy, and their portion of the fund remained in the State bank. In 1831 the profits arising from the State’s stock in the Union Bank was set apart for the use of common schools; and upon the chartering of the Planters Bank of Tennessee and the Farmers & Merchants Bank of Memphis in 1833, the bonus of one-half of 1 per cent on the capital stock, payable annually to the State, was appropriated for the same pur- pose. A similar disposition was made of a bonus of 5. per cent of the netPY 495 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. . 2 - ' rT ~ ‘ + profits of the Tennessee Fire & Marine Insurance Company. This was the condition of the public schools and the school fund at the adoption of the constitution of 1834. That instrument contains the following see- tion concerning education: ARTICLE XI. Sec. 10. Knowledge, learning and virtue being essential to the preservation of repub- lican institutions, and the diffusion of the opportunities and advantages of education throughout the different portions of the State being highly conducive to the promotion of this end, it shall be the duty of the General Assembly in all future periods of this govern- ment to cherish literature and science. And the fund called the ‘‘Common School Fund ” and all the lands and proceeds thereof, dividends, stocks, and all other property of every description whatever heretofore by law appropriated by the General Assembly of this State for the use of common schools, and all such as shall hereafter be appropriated, shall remain a perpetual fund, the principal of which shall never be diminished by- legislative appropriation, and the interest thereof shall be inviolably appropriated to the support and encouragement of common schools throughout the State, and for the equal benefit of the people thereof; and no law shall be made authorizing said fund, or any part thereof, to be diverted to any other use than the support and encouragement of common schools; and it shall be the duty of the General Assembly to appoint a board of commissioners, for such term of time as they may think proper, who shall have the general superintendence of said fund, and who shall make a report of the condition of the same from time to time under such rules, regulations and restrictions as may be required by law; Provided,that if at any time hereafter a division of the public lands of the United States, or of the money arising from the sale of such lands, shall be made among the individual States, the part of such land or money coming to this State shall be devoted to the purpose of education and internal improvements, and shall never be applied to any other purpose. Sar sar - — SIG. mig PASO emeaiee Ea noe Se a were eR aa a le I Rig ap tl ga CNS aac user Shane pce ace ror omens bial The following section affirms ‘that the above provisions shall not be gS ci ine i ss ag construed to prevent the Legislature from carrying into effect any laws mi emgghie ong neoiaete that have been passed in favor of the colleges, universities or academies.”’ Pree ie. maescared de eatin At the following session of the Legislature an act in accordance with a SS SK solani < the provisions of the constitution was passed, appointing a board of com- mon school commissioners consisting of the treasurer, comptroller and a superintendent of public instruction. The last named officer was to be elected by a joint ballot of both houses of the General Assembly for a term of two years, and was to receive a salary of $1,500 per year. He was to collect the moneys, notes and other securities belonging to the common school fund, and in conjunction with the other members of the board he was to appoint an agent in each county. ‘I'hese agents were to perform the duties of the former bank agents and county school commis- sioners. They were to renew the securities for the debts due to the school fund every six months, calling in a certain per cent of the debt each time until the whole should be collected. It was then to be invested in bank stock by the superintendent. During the session of 1839-40 the General Assembly passed an act to establish a system of public schools. The report of a committee ap- pointed to inquire into the condition of the common schools, and to re- a — ae ae —— = . sibs ibain Tee ene es ec $F Ri PS si ne Z ee Fi anaes = = - = ———-—— $e = SS pres epee eee = —— a a = = == <= mt a — — ~ SS —— Tae Se < - nee = SEE = — = = > 7 tron Se ese pemerrete a as so ee — a Se Se ee me - —— a nee ens cursase =m aS : ao ee nn 7% ie 2: - Sater I a eee? ? —— gE SO eT ee FRC ee o ns ao = = é a > ~ a eS smtp syn fs wre mn “Epo er oe spss PRI. eT —— = ee Se eee ree ~ wun ot gn ~ Neal Aaah SAE TSAO AT z Sa, =. = m = 7 " " ns ee - ——_— ss Soe Se E on “ a. ‘i eR Ree a teste eRe firstname ms :HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 427 port a plan for the reorganization of the system, contains the following: “The subject of education has never yet received in Tennessee that a tention which it so richly merits. Appropriation after appropriation, it is true, has been made to the support of common schools, but the system adopted under that name has heretofore proved inefficient and by no means equal to the expectation of those who first established it. Wihile this has been the case with the common school system, a prejudice has prevailed against the higher institutions of learning, academies and col- leges, neither of which consequently has received much from the munit- icence of the State.” ; The committee proposed to add to the existing school fund, amount- ing to a little more than $1,500,000, about $500,000 of the surplus re- venue, the interest on the whole of which it was thought would amount to $100,000 per annum. To the academy fund amounting to $50,000 + it was proposed to add $600,000 of the surplus revenue, and to divide $300,000 of the same fund among three universities, one for each division of the State. The system as adopted did not differ materially from that of 1829, except that the county trustee performed the duties which had previously devolved upon the county commissioners, and the superintend- ent of public ‘instruction had control of the distribution of the annual fund. The apportionment was fixed upon a ratio of white children be- tween the ages of six and sixteen years, instead of five and fifteen as be- fore. The duties of the district trustees remained the same as under the old system. The school fund had already been constituted a portion of the capi- tal of the newly chartered State Bank. and of its dividends the faith of the State was pledged to the annual appropriation of $100.000 to school purposes. This annual revenue was increased by bonuses, taxes, fines and penalties. On the same conditions $18,000 was appropriated an- nually for a period of thirty years for the use of county academies, pro- vided the trustees would relinquish all claims against the State for debts due from citizens south of the French Broad and Holston Rivers. For the benefit of East Tennessee College and Nashville University, two half townships of land in the Ocoee District were granted on eondition that they relinquish their claims, as had been provided in the case of acade- mies. The new system of common schools went into effect in 1838, and by the close of the following year 911 of the 987 districts in the State had chosen trustees and the majority of them had opened schools. The first apportionment of school funds was made in 1839, at a rate of 625 cents for each child of school age, the scholastic population being 185,432.manent wales ae Ras ENE ’ , et ne (7 \ lt il 1 PY if q Hy i Bs ; i € 1 a { | SEER Pte one ecm Ss as ea i Pa EAS Se er eT eer ere rere -— —o ee ee Ss ae Ca ees a latipanegatuer Sepa! amet nea Sry cere a stare mgs banyan — ak eager ss % Be at 9 tore. con ne a rR pF abe” es a Pax nm RE eT RY z a » - rigs et Riinwatin SSS cae i) Doe asses is “; or ' > : a - eer eeTe i") z Rete ae =e " Reece if ‘ oe ~ Rae } ce — eta eel ee SS aes ale ~ come a TLE ce “ = = . . ~ ; ~- ~ ' : : a 2 "3 -—* . 4 - Stet eee = s seme ae 2 ee ert ae < > >. apiealidtiamriaesibh ae a aie Sa er . : ae - ed = sie 4 “ Far . , = . . ae a at aa “ aca prit oenlarted i - a cn a ea a ae re orem » &— ee Sa STS a A Sm a ote: omene = - " CES Lc ee ms aye eae . a ~ ih a ES TS eee z Sys z eins te 8 . — t a pa ae — aati os a sa Kapaa a ol PRES * Ai — ay Aggies Pega ee te gf ey poe aD i MaDe he ry “f D9) fe Mas thet < ae eae Tie ; : = Ww , SS Se ed ng eat AS Ate yo {SS 4) ay 1a at et id 7 My ee Bs 5 Pee es a Sa are — = 7 = = a == ae z SS keg SSS ag BR OFT ga 5 Rs tere teh ~ a a es ie Lie «1Rees eee 4 a i aD >) ee So. Ee ae ei é — Ne An SAT REE =e = = a z BE BU | poner. Pal lina TS taf aT Sti Sle cin 5 new So ee Saale s re Pa . Oe tt Saat —_——— — fs = : a sie — -.2 = — ae = : 5 ; —— = ee - ~ - art eee eae s ci SS a Tr ; c gas a3 nt OPN ea ~ : ep = = ; roe ~ - a ss ss re oan “ — < = Ginx x : tes a = SS Li igs * nN BP ee - - ~ i oe ~ ov ia ig : = ~ aR es ce Ant moat AE = e pate = i £ = : ay a tac, Signe mp clrint dela eemstorn Se. ‘ = 6 a ee seg ga woe ait . a a ee Set NS pec wage 2 A saga ge raEt: ule ee ee ee : ’ x ee i 64 = ; J 4 fa ‘] omary wi ‘ ] | Bat Fo = d Le E - Uibeee ft fost { Ais i: au BUR aes Pe ve pak . aly ‘ i ae D “4 eae hi “heh: t i es Y é / |e y “o, Bi ii ] “| i % 4 BY bi 4 4 . 7 tay ‘ _ el Py i hai itr ees t | ; on Fi - ; ee | ei ae z : } at eer : A 1 he 1b 3 1 f ‘ : Ore hie able i t ay) uf} ; Beli Wah % i ne mite) . ah, 4 t i He : 5 ‘ He . HG ai i ie | a : y | * af A g | j ie f : j 2 i ita ‘ fe 9 | ee eS Bb iH ‘ ft g J $ ( : 4B s An at iy ; iy aes a PibLie ft i ai it I 1 A he it 7) LeoE me ih ce ie " } Bhs t) ay ; F : ee Ly * f fq + be f ie g aia d | | (eg ee oe yaa | i é rf x eth bilbad | ibe eet : : t | } a rein ee: ER } vin } i : ‘ 2) bs 7 Seni fet i ee ‘ i na en) ad | ae i | ' ae Hl } ) 5 } fk 4 t i ft Pet IP i | ah ; iB ! be | } Roy || See } ; ae} thet aie ae ' i } 1 ei | : q j P { ‘ 3 Ph ; il ut ' t y | u ied ; ' Phil i : ’ ime i aaa | “ ft i eae hI } 1 ia i 1 at t i dat | ie > me || RY Lea : ‘al F ' ih ae ' ‘ ‘ {, ; ' 1 hat ; ; ' : ' } j ' $ Po fy } Fr | 4 é fF ; 5 He ; aiy i : a ee q bast § ‘ ‘ it § | t Pal ; } ; i j a} ) \ Hin © rl aii } SIAL 4 f i ; } Fa rel 4 i kh ‘TS h 1 ; , ; i ie i : gad i i ’ Hig 7 eae ipuid a i ' | 1} \ eh) { j ie tile Tk . " ti ef } i : ‘ he : ft i f 1 f aa a Hit ait i 1 eee i : @ ; Hl tone 1 < ' f } ' ; in } i eh } : + j *. { a1 ¢ Pali} j fil = fee 19) ti) 5 eli} | t > } { ‘ | . 5HISTORY OF TENNESSEE 499 people of all parties, denominations and classes more deeply wounded than when the returns of the census of 1840 were promulgated. * * The humiliating fact that there were in the State 58,531 white persons over twenty years of age who could neither read nor write, was heralded over this broad Union, and made the subject of sneering remark in almost every newspaper in the country. Our State stood within one of the bottom ot the list in point of universal intelligence; the number of ignorant in North Carolina being a fraction greater.” The number of white persons over twenty years of age in the State at that time was 249,008. Conse- quently the proportion of illiterates was a little more than 234 per cent. ~ The census of 1850 shows no improvement in the educational status of the State. At that time there were 316,409 white persons over twenty years of age, and of that number 77,522. or 245 per cent could neitherkrand nor write. According to the census of 1860 the proportion of illiterates was 1957, per cent, a gratifying improvement which was probably due in a great measure to the increased efficiency of the common schools. Dur- ing the preceding decade two laws were passed both of which did much to improve the school system. The first, passed in 1854, authorized the county court of each county to levy a tax of 25 cents on each poll, and 25 cents on each $100 worth of proporty, for the use of common schools. If two-thirds of the justices of any county were not in favor of levying such a tax, it was made the duty of the court to order an election to be held to ascertain the wishes of the people. Under the provision of this law the school fund was nearly doubled. The following are the items which made up the fund in 1856 as reported by the treasurer: Krom: the State treasuny.. a. cs sc ce ee is ca oe in pL U0; 000200 Invliew ob land tax cee se hen occ, os ree Se sacs cee 2.000.000 SCHOOltAxXTONYPIOPELbYicn cen wee oe cen coc ice ciel aie wee oa 60,427 71 School tax: ontpollssy vec ack pce nc cece coin ese ca Ss 6 fa ees set SDs409 40 Bonuses from banks and insurance companies................ 12,260 88 roceedsiok escheated lands. .< fcc cca eens de ccs ste Ne ccar: 1,617 -34 Interest on school bonds in Bank of Tennessee.............. 951 37 Totalescc a saceeeestestoetee once eo ono nner nor ote $202,727 00 The scholastic population at that date being 289,609, the allowance for each child amounted to 70 cents, while previous to the passage of the act of 1854 it averaged about 40 cents. In 1856 it was enacted that ea¢h county court of the State, on the first Monday in January of each year, should appoint one or more com- missioners, whose duty it was ‘“‘to examine all applicants to teach free schools.” Another law of some importance was passed in 1851, author- izing commissioners to employ female teachers in any school, and to pay them in the same manner as was provided for male teachers. 27Hy 430 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The first public graded school in the State was established in Nash- ville in 1855. Three years previous to that time Alfred Hume, long an eminent teacher in Nashville, was engaged by the city council to visit various cities in other States where public schools were in operation to investigate their practical works. From the information thus obtained IL FET ER, TF aR A ET i ee = e sa pate areas ane i ec ae ee oe Lae Be Renae nents SD eee = = Sirens See ene com ae ea i Il ay ne Pacha ha ERS PEL PLL ni Ses eI he made a thorough and exhaustive report, which was favorably received, and preparations for the er ction of a school building were soon after Sqr begun. Upon its c mpletion six teachers, all gentlemen, were employed, and the schools formally opened for pupils February 26, 1855. The sooner snegllltaedls oe jeeps oes ot Sereadbe: ee ae os 5 s “tee: Pea oer me eer eas a Cn a < La wre i me ene eet ea i ae? Plies SORONISE a So as SRR : z a ve 7 : = 7 —— om mene en PESTS aE ae ~ ih SSA a EE i sey ; een mane a I Ee Sere a ee ES ; ve —— ——- * —- = = = a ~ 2 ——— a ne Sao ~ el schools were popular and successful from the first. Other buildings Oe ee were soon after provided and the facilities greatly increased. March 20, 1858, an act was passed incorporating the Memphis city ae ae ma Sea = * schools. It placed them under the control of a board of visitors consist- Ey Tay eaepicamaptees enn ing of one member from each ward elected on the first Saturday in June oan ae RT ag oo alia a eae of each year. They were authorized to levy a tax for school purposes not to exceed a ratio of $10 for every youth between the ages of eight and sixteen years. ‘The act was amended two years later, and the limit of the tax levy increased to $15 for each white youth between the ages of six and eighteen years. ‘The board was authorized to erect buildings at a cost not to exceed $70,000, except by a vote of the citizens. Per- ee ee ome CTD ee LICR Ae SIS ae oe ng eam enteee S * Sea : erent ig Pe teen ie 1 mission was also given to the city council to issue bonds for the whole or \ vk 4 i a portion of the amount expended. Thus the two leading cities were supplied with efficient public schools, whose success and popularity did much to encourage the cause of education throughout the State, and the period from 1855 to 1861 was the most prosperous in the history of the m se ie ate NT TON ans SEs re Na tea CS AAT de ee common schools previous to the civil war. But, taken as a whole, the Leen > ieee MN Re as PENN ea eon mee eo x Fea A erm ae : == z= heck Se a more than forty years of experimenting, altering, abolishing, amending and repealing, must be regarded as a stupendous failure when it is re- pins ote ‘ es . bannato lanclbay as ach orien pabtnniababaiiaeatias = i eS . ~ k a = =. pacman . ae — “= gS So ee ge [cae membered: that in 1860 one adult white person out of every five had ee ee de never seen the inside of a school-room. me tt | The same causes, however, which prevented the success of popular education promoted the cause of the private schools, academies and sem- inaries. These institutions sprang up all over the State, and many of them obtained a wide reputation for the excellence of their discipline and instruction. Indeed. it is doubtful if any other State in the Union, according toits population, possessed a greater number of schools of high character. The result was that those persons able to avail themselves of the advantages of these institutions were as a rule thoroughly educated. During the war education was almost at a stand-still. The public schools were suspended, private schools, acadamies and seminaries were closed, many of them never to be reopened. The buildings, too, sufferedHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. A 3} in the general devastation. Many were entirely destroyed, while others were used in turn by the opposing armies for hospitals and camps. At the close of hostilities the educational problem confronting the people of Tennessee was one of the most appalling ever presented to any people. With over 70,000 illiterate adult white persons at the beginning of the war, augmented by thousands, deprived of schools during the suc- ceeding four years, in addition to nearly 300,000 helplessly illiterate freedmen; the situation was not only overwhelmingly discouraging, but positively dangerous. Under the most favorable circumstances to educate such a population and fit it for intelligent citizenship, was an almost hopeless undertaking, but how much more so when impoverished by war and demoralized by a social revolution. The first step toward the reorganization of the common schools was taken in April, 186), when the following resolution was presented to the Senate by John Trimble: Resolved, That it be referred to the committee on comon schools and education to take into early and earnest consideration the whole matter of free common schools. and at as early a date as practicable, report a system of free common schools to be put into operation throughout the State. That it also report what tax is necessary, and how the same may be raised. This resolution, under a suspension of the rules, was referred to the designated committee, of which W. Bosson was chairman. The committee asked that the time to make the report be postponed until the next session, which was granted. The summer of 1865 was employed in read- ing the school laws of other States, corresponding with state superin- tendents, receiving their reports and suggestions, and perfecting: the original bill. It was then sent to eminent educators in various States for criticism. On October 25, 1865, the bill, accompanied by a petition, was presented to the Senate. After undergoing many amendments, rejec- tions and reconsiderations in both houses, it finally became a law in March, 1867. Under its provisions the territorial divisions remained the same as under the old law. The officers provided were a state super- intendent, county superintendents, a board of education for each civil district, and three directors for each subdistrict. The money appro- priated consisted of the proceeds of the school fund, a property tax of 2 mills upon the dollar, a poll tax of 25 cents, and a railroad tax, one-fourth of 1 per cent a mile for each passenger. The annual income from all these sources was paid on the warrant of the comptroller to the state superintendent, and by him distributed to the county superintendents, who acted as county treasurers, and paid all orders of the board of educa- tion both for the civil districts and subdistricts. It was made obliga- tory upon the directors, or in case of their neglect, upon the board of directors, to maintain a free school in every subdistrict for a period of nT a OT I eee Sie RS PTTSe — A — iE OLLIE Ie i | Hl baste ane x ; 1 ina’ j 4 # oh ie 4 | See RHR R OR dae se ee aps r q Hi i “4 Paiiy, ay Ai ‘ Mc S dit fi hin ee aed Bay ag: ie Ht, Pa gal bee! | walla q fe ee | ‘ bee tS ial ( are Toa Gb fis a Pea ee hi | . £ ne ie } } | b Bi eee PT ee at | es Bl ae eabboa ? ia 4 eit tks 2 {| : i Ril DR APeT MA ew SB ht bie Hi 1 ey } a 1a 1 Heat BEF ed Wiel aR) Bei tient alla Papi . if Haat peaeid ‘i WL t } ‘ a * eae fi hme hs Mids las ' hi lf Weal aad 3 : Tit if ttt af p ie ihe RE TERE Pra CL \ HAH ae md i! b REPRO Rene hier pert aed iba || be aT a tp! PERT IT Ae Pan | i) 5 ' } Seeng (eee bie ay hE RW aT | invae a i % ied i fi aes 4 nately Pequly He Te Be | Ha iat i i An Lia fate a at Has (ier ei 2 UE Pere f Ne i ik sais } fee |] i! : ny i f i } | f : i i} brat ant PR ia PE iil HHH eyed: wd yg Fil ii Bet ee a Pee aii iil ae ada | ead) vit WE | 432 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. five months every year. If the school fund were insufficient to defray the expenses of each school the subdistricts were required to levy a tax sufficient to make up the deficiency. The benefits of the schools were free to all of legal age, both white and black without restriction, except that they were to be taught separately. Although the law was to go into effect with the election of school directors, on the first Saturday in June, 1867, so great was the opposition to it. and so many the obstacles to be overcome that it was nearly two years before it became generally established. The state superintendent’s office. with Gen. John Eaton, Jr., at its head, was opened in October, 1867, at which time, as he reported, only here and there had any com- munity complied with any of the requirements of the law. With char- acteristic energy and devotion to the cause he set to work to put in motion the machinery of the new system. County superintendents were appointed, meetings of teachers and superintendents held, addresses de- livered, and all possible means used to arouse the educational sentiment of the people. ‘The law, however, was too far in advance of public opin- ion. The support of the schools, by a tax upon property, met with little favor, while the granting of equal educational advantages to the colored children met with the most violent opposition. The following extract from county superintendents’ report for 1868 and 1869 illustrates the popular sentiment: ‘Monroe County has a strong element that is hos- tile to popular education, and sticks at nothing to embarrass the working of free schools.” The superintendent of Davidson County reported that among the great difficulties to be overcome, one of the greatest, was the organization of colored schools. There were no houses for that pur- pose, and there was a general prejudice against negro education, so that there were only a few white people who would, and dared assist, the col- ored people in building schoolhouses. ‘‘ Most of the directors in this county (Weakley) shake their heads when I talk to them about colored schools, and say this is not the time for such schools. . Others are will- ing to do all they can for them, but are afraid of public opinion.” The following extract is from the report of the state superintendent: ‘‘Super- intendents, directors and teachers resigned their positions on account of threats of personal violence. In July, 1869, sixty-three counties reported thirty-seven schoolhouses had been burned. ‘Teachers were mobbed and whipped; ropes were put around their necks, accompanied with threats of hanging; ladies were insulted. Not a few teachers were dissuaded from teaching out their schools, after they had commenced them, by the reports widely circulated and emphatically repeated, that the State would not disburse any money for schools. In addition to these difficulties super-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 433 intendents and directors often had to employ those not so well qualified as they desired; instead of comfortable schoolhouses teachers often taucht in amere shell of a building; indeed, schools in the summer were renee ed to be taught under the shade of trees. Colored schools found Gat pupils compelled to begin with the alphabet. White schools sometimes exhibited a hardly less deplorable lack of knowledge of letters. One school reported, out of seventy-five enrolled, sixty-eight beginning the alphabet. ”’ | : One of the most serious difficulties encountered was in securing 4 distribution of the school fund. The money raised for school purposes, in 1866, was employed by the State as a loan to liquidate the interest claims upon the railroad, for the payment of which the faith and credit of the State stood pledged, consequently the apportionment and distri- bution of the fund for that year did not take place until the fall of 1868, the amount being 48 and seven one-hundredths cents for each child. The distribution of the fund for 1867 was made in February, 1869, and amounted to about $400,000, or $1.15 for each child. Under the act of 1867 there was raised for that year, by several cities, counties and civil districts, by voluntary local taxation, and paid out for the use of their pub- lic schools an amount aggregating about $130,000. All educational efforts, in the State, however, were soon after almost paralyzed by a decision of the supreme court, declaring that portion of the act providing for civil district taxation unconstitutional. The work of organization, however, was pushed on, and taking into consideration the unsettled condition of the country, the progress was exceedingly rapid. The state superintendent’s report of the work up to September, 1869, gives the following results: White. Colored. Total. Nm bemOmsChOOMNOUSES DULG 4. nme coc cre eee cee | 456 | 172 628 Number of schoolhouse sites procured.... ............ 226 63 289 Num bem Ol SCHOOIS| OPCNEGie aco rics. nn cs ce ae cee ae | 3,405 498 3,903 Ine OL? (EKA TO Gino Gober conan cooumnbocudncnoon|| copoadr IF eee ee. 4.614 Number of different pupils in attendance..............] 160,027 | 25,818 185,845 The work of establishing systems of public schools in the South after the war was greatly aided by the munificence of George Peabody, who, in 1867, placed in the hands of a board of trustees over $2,000,000, in money and securities, for the encouragement of education in the Southern States. This sum two years later he increased by nearly $1,500,000. To the donation of Mr. Peabody was added a gift of 130,000 volumes of school books from D. Appleton & Co. and A. S. Barnes & Co. These ? donations were made for the benefit of both races, white and colored,ad i eres) ee Fe PEL TS et ma. a eee Pee PIA RE RRLT TT CLE a Silesian ee Ie al aera ie Ri i‘ s cea c aes os ae oe Res ees, pe eee ae ee ee Pica Yc set Se Bp ex: “esi nrg eae eee a hones Sond, PLN I OORT a eae ee : ES = ee cee ao Sot. A ae aE ee dee oA eS Tt —_ IP LIE 434 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. without distinction. In November, 1867, Rev. Dr. Sears, the general agent of the trustees of the fund, visited Tennessee, and made arrange- ments to assist normal school instruction and to aid in the establishment of public schools in towns and cities after a certain amount had been done by the citizens. In this way graded schools were opened in Knoxville, Chattanooga, Cleveland, Clarksville, and other localities “‘where schools of that quality would otherwise have been impossible.” Some mention has been made of the attempt to establish colored schools. It was one of the most difficult tasks in the reorganization of the educational system. It was impossible that it should be otherwise. No matter what system or what set of men attempted it, the old prejudices were not ready to witness its progress in quiet. The general judgment that it must be done—that it was better that it should be done—for the whites as well as the blacks, did not suffice to prevent opposition, although it gradually overcame it. The first attempt toward the education of the colored people was made in the autumn of 1862, when Miss Lucinda Humphrey, a hospital nurse, opened an evening school for the colored employes of the hospital at Memphis. Others followed, increasing from year to year, until in the winter of 1864-65 a method was provided for the colored people to enter actively into the work of supporting their own schools, and after which, in about five months, they paid for the purpose some $4,000, and the attendance was reported in and around Memphis as high as 1,949 in April, 1865, before the organization of the Freedmen’s Bureau. In Clarksville schools were established for them in 1864, and by the spring of 1865 had realized an attendance of some 300. During the same period Rey. J. G. McKee and his associates opened similarly flourishing schools in Nashville, and others did the same in Murfreesboro, Chatta- nooga, Knoxville, and other points.* In the spring of 1865 the Freedmen’s Bureau was established, and during the next four years disbursed over $150,000 in the State, the greater part of which was bestowed upon colored schools. Indeed a large part of the colored schoolhouses would not have been built without the aid thus obtained. In connection with this bureau various organizations operated efficiently, both in sustaining schools and in supplying well qualified and competent teachers. Several of these organizations ex- pended large amounts of money, estimated in 1869 at an aggregate of $300,000. At the close of the seventh decade popular education in Tennessee was higher than at any previous period in the history of the State. The school law of 1867 was the first legislative attempt to- *Report of Superintendent of Public Instruction, 1869.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 435 ward a thoroughly appointed state system of public instruction in Ten- nessee, and a great work had been accomplished under it; yet in a little more than two years after its enactment it was repealed. The cause of its failure to sustain itself is explained in the following extract from the report of the state superintendent for 1874: “Tt is enough to say that the experiment was inopportunely made, and the projected system was ill-adapted to the prevailing condition of our people. The echoes of the war had not died away. Political and social disorder still prevailed throughout the State, and a people, not yet assured of their civil status, were not in a favorable condition to be very profitably concerned about a costly system of popular education, or to be cheerfully taxed for its support. Thus, lacking popular favor and confi- dence, the experiment failed, and may be now advantageously cited, in contrast with the ante bellum ‘system,’ as demonstrating that in public school enterprises, as in all other matters, as much harm may often result from attempting too much as from being content with too little; and further, that an active popular sympathy is essential to the success of any system of public instruction.”’ The repeal of the act of 1867 took place December 14, 1869. The state superintendent and county superintendents were ordered to turn over all the funds remaining in their hands to the comptroller of the State, and the former was given ninety days to wind up the affairs of his office. During the ten years from 1860 to 1870 no county in the State had more than three sessions of public schools, while many had no more than one. The private schools too were not so numerous, and many who had previously been able to pay tuition for their children were rendered un- able to do so by the misfortunes of the war. It is little to be wondered at that illiteracy increased most lamentably. While the white population increased but 13 per cent during:the decade the increase in the number of white illiterates was 50 per cent. Upon the adoption of the constitu- tion of 1870 the clause in the old constitution concerning education was reaffirmed. It was further provided that ‘“ no school established or aided under this section shall allow white and negro children to be received as scholars together in the same school.”’ In July, 1870, an act to reorganize the public schools was passed. By this law the whole subject of popular education was virtually remitted to the counties, without imposing any obligations upon them to take action in the premises. No State levies upon property for school purposes were made, and a tax of 50 cents was imposed upon polls. The only offi- cers provided for were three commissioners ‘for each civil district, who collectively constituted a county board of education, and’ into whoseTERE oP SFOS, ee 7 S om 7 . ee a a ee a pcm So ee N ae ; ee! ——— om ee SE riticcn se ee ee = a “a etna 2 te nanan eraae = meee = = =e me, ™ a = a ay RE ET ca 2 ee TNE MNT LS aaa . - tee = we Soe Le hie a a an aS Ds : - 7 = Seal = — ae SEE ap ae 2 aS LEESON SIR ae TENNESSEE. 436 HISTORY OF hands was placed the entire management of the schools. A subsequent act made the state treasurer superintendent of public instruction, ex officio, but no special duties were imposed upon him, and “‘he was a super- intendent without a charge and without authority.” The absolute failure of this system, if it can be called a system, induced the State Teachers’ Association to recommend to the agent of the Peabody Fund the pro- priety of appropriating $1,500 during the year 1872 toward the support of an agent to co-operate with the state treasurer, and to work under the immediate supervision of the association. ‘This recommendation was adopted, and J. B. Killebrew appointed agent. made assistant superintendent of public instruction, and in March, 1872, It was found that less than thirty He was soon after made a report which was published. counties had levied a tax for school purposes, and in the remainder no action whatever had been taken. ‘‘In many of the counties where a school tax has been levied, commissioners have been elected who are op- posed to any system of public instruction and feel a greater desire to make public schools unpopular by making them inefficient and of but little value, than to see them gaining ground and winning their way to elevating and refining the public heart and oO In neighborhoods where a high order of intelligence prevails, public favor by educating, mind. and where a decided interest has been manifested by the best citizens, good schools exist under the county system. On the other hand, where these conditions do not exist, free schools of the most worthless character are kept up a few weeks in the year, and taught by men whose chief dis- tinction or fitness for the position lies in the severity and cruelty of their discipline and their adhesion to text-books used half a century ago.” * It was estimated by the assistant superintendent that during the year 1872 not one-fifth of the scholastic population of the State had any means of education. In some counties visited by him there was not a single school, public or private, in operation, ‘‘nor were there any efforts being made by the citizens to remedy the deficiency.” He justly pro- nounced the system then in operation ‘‘a farce and utterly devoid of vitality.” At this time the trustees of the Peabody Fund rendered valu- able assistance to many cities, towns and districts in maintaining schools. In 1871 an aggregate of $24,900 was furnished to fifty-five schools; in 1872 a similar amount was granted. No organization has done more to promote the educational interests of Tennessee than the State Teachers’ Association, which was organized in July, 1865. Aside from the various measures of practical importance that owe their projection to’this body, its meetings haye awakened the *Report of J. B. Killebrew.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 437 public mind to the great need of better educational facilities. To this association the present school law owes its existence. At their meeting in 1872 a committee was appointed to prepare a draft of a school law, and present it to the Legislature with a memorial asking for its adoption, In their communication to the Legislature the committee said: “The friends of popular education from every part of Tennessee united together under the name of ‘The Tennessee State Teachers’ Asso- ciation’ have been laboring for years past, and labor without money and without price, to procure the adoption of a system of public free schools to which the sons of the poor and the rich shall come with feelings of equality and independence; schools whose excellence shall attract all the children of our State, and which shall become the objects of pride and affection to every one of our citizens.” ‘The system recommended by the association is one combining the State, the county and the district systems, retaining the valuable features of all and thus harmonizing all conflicting views as to different systems.”’ The form of the school law presented with the memorial was amended in a few particulars, and finally passed both houses in March, 1873. This law has since suffered but little modification. It provides for the appointment of a state superintendent, county superintendent and dis- trict school directors. The state superintendent 1s nominated by the governor and confirmed by the Senate. He is allowed an annual salary of $1,995, and is required to devote his entire time and attention to his duties. His duties are to collect and disseminate information in rela- tion to public schools; to make tours of inspection among the public schools throughout the State; to see that the school laws and regulations are faithfully executed; to prepare and distribute blanks, blank forms for all returns required by law; to appoint inspectors of schools; to require reports from county superintendents, or some one appointed in his place; to prescribe the mode of examining and licensing teachers; to re- port to the comptroller on the Ist of December of each year the schol- sovernor annually all information Cou astic population, and to report to the regarding the schools. The county superintendents are elected biennially by the county courts of each county, which also fixes their salaries. They are required to visit the schools, confer with teachers and directors, to examine teach- ers and issue certificates, to report to the county trustee the scholastic population of their respective counties, and to report to the state super- intendent whenever required. The law provides for the election of three directors for each school district for a term of three vears, one going out each year. The electiona Se a i at i aca er 3 ot aia ee ROSE St io \ “4 i ae DRE aE At Haat i Wi ae ‘ ne f a qa } { ze ie ie ane | Nata p RE een eel . rai tet | ety RyRy Neaike 1 ey ee ea Be gn a HE aa | tpi Ke ith i] ( 1] | hth Tn Ui BT eae hie eA a | \ tian ! oe ‘ Ti HTL a Lace a 7 ky Nee ana Elna inet ie i | iti te i : iL fi i ey bi 4 i Ht rat {| i ie / at Ariel ci im 1k o Peae nia | by Lae tia Wa | | i ay {ieee | Bats (Fil hee tae atid i ee Tae an if 1 i i | } aT | lm Hil i 4 Hl We aT he 1 Ute eh Hy ne Hi ih LAR ee i g 1 i 4 i, 438 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. is held on the first Thursday in August by the sheriff of each county. The directors are required to explain and enforce the school law, and for this purpose to visit the schools within the district from time to time; to employ teachers and, if necessary, to dismiss them; to suspend or dismiss pupils when the prosperity of the school makes it necessary; to use the school fund in such manner as will best promote the interest of public schools in their respective districts; to hold regu- lar meetings and call meetings of the people of the districts for consulta- tion; to keep separate and apart the schools for white and colored chil- dren; to disburse the school funds; to take care of the public school property, and to report to county superintendents. The clerk and treasurer of the district, who is elected from the board of directors, is required to take the census of all persons between six and eighteen years of age, in the month of July, to gather statistics and to keep a report of proceedings. He is allowed 2 cents per capita for tak- ing the scholastic population, and that constitutes his compensation for his year’s service as clerk. Public school officers and teachers are en- joined, under a penalty of not less than $200 nor more than $500 and removal, for having any pecuniary interest in the sale of school books, furniture or apparatus, or from acting as agent for the sale of such, or from receiving any gift for their influence in recommending or procuring the use in the school of any of the articles mentioned, A certificate of qualification is required of every teacher. Teachers are required to keep a daily register of facts pertaining to their respect- ive schools. Written contracts must be made with teachers, and for like services of male and female teachers like salaries shall be paid. The schools are open to all persons between the ages of six and twenty- one years residing within the school district, and in special cases those residing in different districts, provided that white and colored persons shall not be taught in the same school. Orthography, reading, writing, arithmetic, grammar, geography, elementary geology of Tennessee, his- tory of the United States and the elementary principles of agriculture are the prescribed branches, while vocal music may also be taught. No other branches are to be introduced except as provided for by local tax- ation, or allowed by special regulations upon the payment of such rates ot tuition as may be prescribed. The district directors are given power to make contracts of consolidation with the trustees, teachers or other authorities of academies, seminaries, colleges or private schools, by which the public schools may be taught in such institutions, provided that the branches of study designated as the studies of public schools shall be taught free of any charge in suchHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 439 consolidated schools. ‘I'he permanent school fund of the State, as recog- nized by the constitution, was declared to be $1,500,000, to which was added the unpaid interest amounting, January 1, 1873, to $1,012,500. For the entire amount, $2,512,500, a certificate of indebtedness was is- sued, signed by the governor, under the great seal of the State, and de- posited with the comptroller of the treasury. Interest is paid on this amount at the rate of 6 per cent, the payments being made on the 1st of July and the 1st of January each year. To the permanent state fund is added from time to time the proceeds of all escheated property, of all property accruing to the State by forfeiture, of all lands sold and bought in for taxes, of the personal effects of intestates having no kindred en- titled thereto by the laws of distribution, and donations made to the State for the support of public schools, unless otherwise directed by the donors. The annual school fund is composed of the annual proceeds of the permanent school fund, any money that may come into the state treasury for that purpose from any source whatever, the poll tax of $1 on every male inhabitant of the State subject thereto, and a tax of 1 mill on the dollar’s worth of property subject to taxation. This last tax, together with the poll tax, is paid over to the county trustee in the county where collected, and distributed to each school district, according to scholastic population. When the money derived from the school fund and taxes imposed by the State on the counties is not sufficient to keep up a public school for five months in the year in the school districts in the county, the county court may levy an additional tax sufficient for this purpose, or submit the proposition to a vote of the people; and a tax to prolong the schools beyond the five months may also be levied. ‘This tax must be levied on all property, polls and privileges liable to taxation, but shall not exceed the entire State tax. Taxes so levied by the county are col- lected in the same manner as other county taxes, and paid over to the county trustee for distribution. The State treasurer and county trustee are required to keep the school moneys separate from State and county funds. All school moneys in the treasury on the first Monday in October and April of every year, are apporticned by the comptroller among the several counties according to the population. The warrant for the amount due each county is drawn in the favor of the county trustee. The money received by him he is required to report immediately to the county superintendent and to the directors of each school district. The law further provides for schools in incorporated cities and towns, the boards of mayor and aldermen of which are authorized to levy and collect an additional tax to that imposed by the general provisions of the—_ GF iM SAL SEO ES TTT ee Ss “" . “ = Ti GT sas ~ era + harp ERNE apseesre mare - = =" oa = LEER R ETE OL LL i OR LOT OO AT 8 mregey : ; Saeed oe ei aN az LE eal eS EAT So Se ee ore . on : : - a _ ee - - ———— a , 7 ee - ET ORE Pe alco oa ae * as oe ee - = = a Sen ~ - - _ ee a yh ratte es pashecer ~ Fain ahr —— i ai s samt a | al X = ~ as ee : o- = * ae 2 . ~ . - a Tapa ph ie tL A — ee eee = SS oe een aaa = ~ i c t =i or < on te 44() HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. school law, upon all taxable polls, privileges and property within the cor- porate limits. Where such schools are esiablienee authority is given for the appointment of a board of education. The law also requires the governor to appoint a State Board of Education consisting of six mem- bers, holding their office for a term of six years, two retiring each year, The governor is ex officio president of the board. The principal duty of this board is to provide for and manage the State’ Normal School. The law went into effect immediately after its passage, and extraordin- ary efforts for the multiplication and elevation of the public schools were made during the succeeding year. John M. Fleming was appointed superintendent of public instruction, and made his first report in Decem- ber, 1874. From this report it is found that in 1873 there were thirty- six counties which levied no property tax, and thirty-two which levied no poll tax. The remaining counties levied a poll tax of from 5 cents to $1, and property tax from 24 to 30 cents. Sixty-five counties levied no privi- lege tax. The tax levies for 1874 were about the same as for the year before. The total amount of school money received by the counties for the year ending August 31, 1874, was $998,459.10, of which $265,951.53 ee eromn the State. $522.453.17 from the counties, $112,636.17 from dis- tricts, and $97,418.23 from other sources. During the same time $34,- 300 was received from the Peabody Fund, and distributed among sixty- two schools. The scholastic population in 1874 numbered 420,384, of which 103,856 were colored. The number of white teachers employed was 4,630, colored 921.* The average number of months taught during the year for the State was 3.85. The average pay of teachers per month was $33.03. Thus a State school system was once more inaugurated, and this time with better prospects of success, yet many difficulties and considerable opposition were yet to be overcome. The financial distress of the State rendered retrenchment in the State expenditures a necessity, and many persons friendly to the cause of popular education, in their desire to extricate the State from her difficulties favored the reduction of the appropriation for schools. In 1877 the Legislature went so far as to pass an act abolishing the office of county superintendent and practi- eally abolished that of the state superintendent also. This false step was arrested only by the governor’s veto. The superintendent’s report for the year ending August 31, 1880, shows a marked improvement not only in the number of schools, but also in the character of the instruction afforded. The scholastic population at that time numbered 944,862, of whom 290,141 were enrolled in the *Marion County not reporting.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 44] public schools, and 41,068 in private schools. The number of teachers employed was white, 3,506, and colored 1,247. The aggregate receipts from all sources for school purposes amounted to $930,734.33. Out of the ninety-four counties in the State only ten failed to levy a school tax. The census reports of 1880 present conclusive evidence of increased efficiency in the schools of the State. During the preceding decade the increase in the number of white illiterates was only eleven and four- tenths per cent, while the increase in white population was twenty-one and seven-tenths per cent. This in contrast with the report of 1870 is a gratifying Improvement. The following statistics for the year ending August 81, 1885, afford still further proof that the public schools throughout the State are steadily advancing. The scholastic population numbered 609,028, of whom 156,143 were colored; 17,214 teachers ~ taught in 6,605 schools, with an aggregate enrollment of 373,877; and an average daily attendance of 150,50 A 02 white, and 41,901 colored pupils. Total amount of school money received, including the balance on hand at the beginning of the year, was $1,308,839.17. The number of school- houses in the State was 5,066, of which 289 were erected during the year. A great improvement in the character of the houses is noticed. While ten years before a large part of the houses built were logs, out of 989 built in 1880 only fifty-nine were ot that kind. The estimated value of school property at that time was $1,375,780.86. The following table shows the average number of days in which the schools were in session. for each year since the establishment of the present system: Ice gas cot cess 17 1880. sockine. 1879 67 1881. 86 1876 “cl illets, 1882. 73 1877 7a60 1883. . 78 ibis), an too oocodcdder Seca eee SueeelGl 1884. 18 NOM ne is oc les oe cc eyes Suan osO8 1889. ..80 For the past three years the office of superintendent of public in- struction has been filled with marked ability by Thomas H. Paine, who is doing much to sustain and advance the educational interests of the State. Although the condition of the public schools is not entirely sat- isfactory, the progress that has been made during the past ten years has assured their permanency. Heretofore one of the greatest impediments to efficient schools has been the lack of competent teachers, but this ob- stacle is gradually being removed. The normal schools are annually sending out increased numbers of trained teachers, while institutes and associations are doing much to improve those already in the work. It can hardly be expected, however, that the best results will be attained until the school revenue is in some way sufficiently increased to furnishee eS : as ea "a = ae : oa | TONES 3 nee eet aR ae ae a oe ee See ae Car —_— a — loom eee Sot aa ag) ppt noma aces Amt: at ty cent cat eainadl ery: ce SH cag TEN AS I OTA ENEN caida or ete és Sindee = Far apy Te ge SSA Na ne STIR Ag a aN ashes i EE elle SS aT 449 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. the youth of the State an average of more than seventy-five days of school in a year. During the winter of 1884-85 an educational exhibit was made at the World’s Industrial and Cotton Centennial Exposition at New Orleans. This department was placed under the direction of Prof. Frank Goodman, of Nashville, who by energy and persistency succeeded in presenting an exhibit which did not suffer in comparison with any other State. All the leading colleges, seminaries and high schools in the State were represented. In the early part of this chapter the history of Cumberland College was traced to the election of Dr. Priestly as president of the board of trustees in 1810. The exercises of the institution were conducted by him until 1816, when they were suspended and so continued until his re- election for a second term in 1820. The college was then re-opened, but was soon compelled to suspend again on account of the death of Dr. Priestly, which occurred in February, 1821. The institution then re- Piairod closed until the autumn of 1824, when Dr. Phillip Lindsley, who had just refused the presidency of Princeton College, was prevailed up- on to take charge of it. At that time, of the 240 acres originally granted to the college, only about six remained. ‘This formed the old college campus and included the site of the present medical college. In 1825 a farm of 120 acres near the college was purchased at $60 per acre. Por- tions of this land were soon after sold for about $17,000, leaving thirty acres. Dr. Lindsley reorganized the institution, and it was opened for the winter session of 1824-25 with thirty-five students. It was his aim and desire to make Nashville the great educational center of the South- west. He planned the building of a university to consist of several colleges, like those of Oxford and Cambridge. Accordingly on November 27, 1826, the Legislature passed an act to incorporate the trustees and offi- cers of Cumberland College under the name of the University of Nash- ville. The following is the preamble to the act: WHEREAS, it is represented to be the wish of the trustees of Cumberland College to erect several additional halls and colleges besides that heretofore known and still to be known by the name of Cumberland College on their grounds near Nashville, and to estab- lish additional schools thereon, and by a union of the whole to build up a university and thereby to enlarge their sphere of operations and increase their means of usefulness. This change, however, proved to be only in name, as the university continued with the same departments and under the same organization as the college. The number of students gradually increased until the summer of 1836, when the attendance reached 126. From that time until 1850, when the institution was suspended, the attendance decreased. This was owing in a great measure to the large number of sifmilar insti- tutions which had been established in the State. In an address deliveredHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Lf i CO in 1847, Dr. Lindsley says: ‘“‘When this college was revived and reor- ganized at the close of 1824, there were no similar institutions in actual] operation within 200 miles of Nashville. There were none in Alabama. Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Middle or West Tennessee. There are now some thirty or more within that distance, and nine within fifty miles of our city.” A report on the university made in 1850 by a committee consisting of L. P. Cheatham, F. B. Fogg, EK. H. Ewing, John M. Bass and R. J. Meigs, has the following concerning the attendance: ‘During the whole of this time (1824-50) the number of students has been larger than that of any other institution in ‘Tennessee, when the following facts are taken into consideration. There is no preparatory school attached to the uni- versity, and the students have usually been members of the college classes proper. Most students when they come to enter the University of Nashville, come to enter the junior class, and usually two-thirds of the e whole number of students are members of the junior and senior classes.” The whole number of regular graduates with the degree of Bachelor of Arts from 1813 to 1824 were 18; from 1824 to 1850, 414. The total number of students matriculated in the regular college classes during the latter period was 1,059. Dr. Lindsley was a thorough scholar, and under his management the college maintained a high standard. ‘‘Under its influence grew up a cultivated, liberal community; through its influence and by the efforts of the young men sent forth to engage in and to encourage education, sprang up twenty colleges within fifty miles of Nashville, to divide, dis- tract and compete with the university, and at the same time to accom- plish much good. It was the inevitable eonflict of localities which had to demonstrate that every village cannot be a seat of learning. It pre- pared the soil in which great institutions take deep root and flourish— the soil which has developed the public school system and attracted hither Vanderbilt University, the Normal School, and brought here the Fisk, Tennessee Central and Baptist Normal and Theological Colleges to engage in the great work of the elevation of the African race of America.’’* The university exercises were suspended in 1850, the old college building being transferred to the medical department, which was then organized. For several years previous the organization of a medical department of the university had been under contemplation. So early as 18483 a committee of the board of trustees reported it advisable to at once establish a medical school. The subject continued to be agitated *H. M. Doak.Cg SP Be a INS ME PEAS. z Fae a 3 eee ea a, bh 444 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. by medical men, but nothing definite was accomplished until the latter part of 1850, when an address was presented to the trustees of the uni- versity by prominent physicians of Nashville asking privilege to establish a medical department with entire independence of management. This was granted. The board then elected the following corps of instructors: John M. Watson, M. D., obstetrics and diseases of women and children; A. H. Buchanan, M. D., surgery; W. K. Bowling, M. D., institutes and practice of medicine; C. K. Winston, M. D., materia ‘medica and phar- macy; Robert M. Porter, M. D., anatomy and physiology; J. Berrien Tuindsley, M. D., chemistry and pharmacy. Winston was chosen presi- dent of the faculty, and Lindsley, dean. A lease of the university build- ing was made for a term of twenty-two years, which has since been twice extended, the last time in 1875, making the lease expire in October, 1905. The first class, numbering thirty-three, was graduated in February, 1852. Theinstitution immediately took rank with the first medical schools in the United States, both as to the excellence of its training, and the number of students. In 1857 there were 137 graduates, and in 1861, 141. Its alumni in 1880 numbered 2,200. In 1874 the Vanderbilt University adopted the faculty of the medical department of Nashville University with the agreement that students matriculating in the former institution shall be graduated under its auspices, and receive its diploma, while the matriculates of the latter shall be graduated as before. In 1853-54 a portion of the land still remaining was sold and new buildings were erected a short distance from the old college. In the fall of the latter year the literary department was re-opened with an attend- ance of forty pupils, and three graduates at the end of the year. In 1855 it was united with the Western Military Institute, of which Gen. Bushrod R. Johnson was superintendent. It was conducted on the military plan until the breaking out of the civil war, when the buildings were used as a hospital. After the close of the war the trustees of the university located the Montgomery Bell Academy in the buildings of the literary department of the university. This school was founded by the bequest of Montgom-. ery Bell, a prominent iron manufacturer, who left $20,000 for that pur- pose. ‘By the will of the founder, gratuitous instruction is given to twenty-five boys, not less than ten nor more than fourteen years of age, ‘who are unable to support and educate themselves, and whose parents are unable to do so,’ from the counties of Davidson, Dickson, Montgomery and Williamson, Tennessee.” The academy continued to occupy a portion of the university building until 1881, when a separate building wasI L Bei [Ze oe Pas I ae 5S oe it , - —F- = 7 FA Es wn WM fe c Z < E Z = | Fi Z ° 4 < H Hi 5 my, ra Oe ~~ s tte a Pe Pea ¢ Mie ce, Rake, ae bey Se fe 1 SS NSS =< bed, Yeon Ci ® ay PAY ee (BS eaten av 0 tr eee ae naeee a aoe ca eo : = a in Ni: mae RAR RCRD ipa Ate re ntsc pe Serene ae pO a ~ owe Sp, eRe SeR i RELIES pc ARTI perigee ae ae _epreaan I — -~ - = - area - ee ve ¥ my Ss Ta oo oe aeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 445 erected for it, to make room for the increasing attendance of the normal college. | This latter institution was the re-habilitation in a more vital form of the literary and scientific departments of the university, giving them a larger and more comprehensive sphere in the direction of popular educa- tion in the South. Its establishment was accomplished through the aid granted by the trustees of the Peabody Fund, whose aim it had been from the first to assist the cause of education in the South by providing trained teachers rather than by direct support of schools. lt was there- fore determined to establish one or more thoroughly equipped normai colleges. In 1867 Dr. Lewis proposed to give $2,000 to aid a normal school in Tennessee, if one should be established. For various reasons this could not then be accomplished, but $800 and $1.000 was oranted to Fisk University and the Lookout Mountain school, respectively, both of which organized normal departments. In 1873 a bill for the establishment of a State normal school was presented to the Legislature, and passed three readings in the Senate and two in the House, but was defeated for want of time at the close of the session. This bill made provision for supplementing $6,000 annually from the Peabody Fund by an appopriation of an equal amount from the treasury of the State. At the next session of the General Assembly a similar bill was introduced, but it failed inthe Senate. ot aes beer = ets ™ RET Ree Pa a! aa a ~ aa ret ss - - een oh iT ae nC cia 4 en os : ( a eee a : - d | cen eS oe = 2 ane Res BS ‘ I si. families and useful to their their rights as citizens. and duties as servants of the people.” This scheme proved a failure. A sufficient number of tickets were not sold, and no drawing occurred. Meanwhile, Hampden Sidney Academy had been established for Knox County, and its trustees, by ion, had succeeded in raising sufficient funds to justify i ee yes sas uae Se _ - L Cente nape -. = . mero ae airy ae private subscript r r . 7 rad 1 a Sil? effecting an organization. However, it was not until January 1, 1817, that the academy opened its doors for the reception of pupils. In Octo- ber, 1820, the trustees of Hast Tennessee College decided to put that institution into operation again, and an agreement was entered into whereby the academy and college were united, D. A. Sherman, the mo Age a ° = $ 7 ye oS one cm 7 er ee es a ae cae fe caer nee eine eae ee tee prine ipal of the academy, becoming Dee of the college. He was a graduate of Yale, of the class of 1802, and for several years afterward a tutor in that institution. During his presidency of the college, he was assisted by Daniel E. Watrous, James McBath ond David S. Seinen the last named, the first graduate of Hast Tennessee College, taking his de- gree in 1821. Mr. Sherman, on account of failing health, withdrew from the college in 1825, and Samuel R. Rodgers and James McBath contin- ued the exercises as tutors in charge for one year. In 1826 the trustees, having obtained permission to select another and more eligible site than the Poplar Spring, purchased of Pleasant M. Miller, for the sum of $600, Barbara Hill, so named, in honor of Barbara Blount, the daughter of William Blount. They proceeded to: erect the center college building and three one-story dormitories back of the college, so arranged as to make a square of the campus. The trus- tees then succeeded in securing as president the Rey. Charles Coffin, of Greeneville College, aman of great wor th and elegant classical attainments. About this time considerable popular opposition toward colleges was manifested, and those institutions suffered accordingly. Dr. Coftin, how- souiusiaiiizastisin SRSUURSAgTTeRaERERSNGUREERC RRNA ever, prosecuted his labors for several years in the face of the greatest difficulties and embarrassments, with unr emitting energy and assiduity, but el ra lg a popular prejudice increased. In 1832, worn down ih excessive labor and anxious care, he was compelled to resign the presidency, and the next year was succeeded by James H. Piper, of Virginia, an alumnus of the a college of the class of 1830. At the end of one year he resigned the presi- dency in despair. Itis said that he was the ambitious youth who aspired ———— to carve his name above that of the father of his country, on the natural bridge. porte Sam. ae aT TS ae sHISTORY OF TENNESSER. 449 He was immediately succeeded by Joseph Estabrook, a graduate of Dartmouth. He at once secured a corps of able assistants, and soon suc- ceeded in raising the college from almost total prostration to a respecta- hle rank among the educational institutions of the country. In 1837 the college was organized into regular classes, and the first catalooue was published. By an act of the Legislature in 1840, the name of East Ten- nessee College was changed to that of Kast Tennessee University, and ereater power and more extended privileges were granted. Scan after the sale of a part of the land belonging to the institution enabled the g contracted with Thomas Crutchfield, Esq., of Athens, who had built the main edifice, to erect the two three-story dormitories, and the two houses trustees to make some important and long needed improvements. They and appurtenances on the right and left slopes, originally intended to be used as dwellings by the professors, but which an increasing demand for room has required to be appropriated to other purposes. The final set- tlement of the commissioners, James H. Cowan and Drury P. Armstrong, with the contractor, July, 1848, exhibits as the total cost of the improve- ment the sum of $20,965.15. At this time the college was just entering upon a decline, which was hastened by the resignation of President Estabrook, in 1850. This de- cline was due to the same causes that compelled the suspension of the University of Nashville—the multiplication of colleges and denom- inational schools throughout Tennessee and the entire South. The trustees, appreciating the necessity, called into requisition the great name and extensive personal popularity of the Hon. W. B. Reese, who had a short time before resigned his seat upon the supreme bench. Judge Reese assumed the presidency in the fall of 1850, but even his great learning, industry, and influence were not sufficient to stay the decline; and after having graduated an even dozen students, he resigned at the end of the third year of his presidency. The trustees experienced con- siderable difficulty in securing a satisfactory successor. Rey. George Cook was finally elected and accepted. He was a native of New Hamp- shire, a graduate of Dartmouth. and had been for several years the prin- cipal of a flourishing female seminary in Knoxville. As a majority of the professors had resigned with the president, the vacancies had to be filled, and the formal opening of the university was postponed from the fall of 1853 until the beginning of the summer session of 1854. The cholera prevailed with considerable violence and fatality in Knoxville in the following September, and the fear of its recurrence deterred the stu- dents from returning at the opening of the winter session. An attempt was then made to organize a medical department, but a- ra Saas car CaS - Se RLS ee ee ET ——a Yr S a a - 7 = wreate : ~ er ienate ata cml ei ea ih — ee i mncwopnteemper arm ~~ = ee a ae oh crete = — . On Re a en ta cara ysl me 3 mapa 9 Aone Eek Maa pisos) a “ a ag EE GC RE - ae Saag Nase ih see we = oo cere ——— ee } fj ; ~ Seah s coe + ae a ; = BY abeemnnaae Sa i sSiony tenn iheenstnrenctetare' tenement etter RSTO RS Spee i — ee mS eg. i - 7 in a BPG are Sa = Bit wir Its“ ene ae ae | saa Es se Arar natal en a == <= a seca a + - = nae 450 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. sufficient number of competent physicians eould not be obtained to fill the chairs. After this failure an agreement was entered into with the Western Military Institute to consolidate that institution with the uni- versity, but Nashville offered greater inducements, and: it went there. President Cook next recommended the establishment of an agricultural department, but before the result of his last proposition was learned, he resigned in despair in 1857. During the following year the exercises of the university were suspended, and another unsuccessful attempt was made to establish a medical department. On the 20th of March, 1858, the head of Burritt College, Van Buren County, Tenn., was elected, president of the university, and under his charge the university was formally reopened in September following. At the close of his second year he resigned, and the vacancy thus caused was filled by the election of Rey. J. J. Ridley, of Clarksville. Owing to the untiring efforts of the retiring president the next session opened with a largely increased attendance. The first important action taken by the new president was to secure the adoption of a resolution extending gra- tuitous education to candidates for the ministry of all religious. denom- inations. A military department was again organized and rigid discipline adopted in the management of the university. But just as the institu- tion was again in successful operation the civil war came on. Students enlisted and instructors resigned. In a short time general demoraliza-— tion pervaded the whole institution. A portion of the university build- ings was soon demanded by the military. On February 7, 1862, the president unconditionally resigned. The buildings and grounds were used by the Confederates and Federals in turn; and after the close of the war the United States Government paid to the trustees, in the way of rents and damages, the sum of $15,000. July 10, 1865, the board of trustees, as a preparatory step toward reorganizing the university and resuming exercises therein, unanimously elected the Rey. Thomas Humes president, who at once addressed him- self to the task before him. The university buildings, in consequence of their having been occupied for several years by the army, were not in a condition to be used for college purposes. Without waiting for the nec- essary repairs to be made, in the spring of 1866 President Humes resumed exercises in the buildings of the Deaf and Dumb Asylum. In September, 1867, the work of instruction was resumed in the college buildings. In accordance with the provisions of an act of Congress, approved July 2, 1862, making endowments for industrial colleges to the severalHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Eyl States, the Legislature of the State in January, 1869, appropriated, upon certain conditions, the agricultural fund to East Tennessee Univer- sity. In June, 1869, the trustees organized the Tennessee Industrial College, and in September of the same year it went into operation. Its endowment from the United States was invested in 396 State of Tennes- see bonds of $1,000 each, bearing 6 per cent interest, the payment of which for several years was much delayed. Notwithstanding this serious A fine farm situated about three-fourths of a mile from the university was purchased obstacle, the success of the institution was very gratifying. for its use; new buildings were erected, and an excellent chemical labor- atory was provided and equipped. In 1879 the name of East Tennessee University was changed, by an act of the Legislature, to the University of Tennessee. At the same time the governor was authorized to appoint a board of visitors to the university, three from each grand division of the State, and other legislation connecting the university intimately with the public school system of the State. Since that time a full university organization has been adopted. The courses of instruction have been enlarged and multiplied, and the university now offers excellent advan- tages for both general and special study. The medical department was organized as the Nashville Medical Col- lege in the summer of 1876. It was founded by Drs. Duncan Eve and W. F. Glenn, who drew from the faculty of the medical department of the University of Nashville and Vanderbilt University Drs. Paul EF. Eve, T. B. Buchanan, George 8. Blackie, W. P. Jones and J. J. Abernethy. The first session of this institution commenced on March 5, 1877, and was attended with brilliant success from the first. In the spring of 1879 a dental department was established, being the first dental school in the South. ees of the University of Tennessee to become their medical department, During the same year an overture was received from the trust- and such an agreement was effected. Hon. William P. Jones, M. D., president of faculty, professor of mental diseases and public The following is the present faculty: hygiene; Duncan Eve, M. D., dean of the faculty, professor of sur- gery and clinical surgery; William F. Glenn, M. D., professor of physi- ology, genito-urinary and venereal diseases; J. Bunyan Stephens, WE, 1D). professor of obstetrics and clinical midwifery; Deering J. Roberts, M. D., professor of theory and practice of medicine and clinical medicine: Paul F. Eve, M. D., professor of general, descriptive and surgical anat- omy; William D. Haggard, M. D., professor of gynecology and diseases of children; Woodford M. Vertrees, M. D., professor of materia mediec and therapeutics: William E. McCampbell, M. D., professor of medical te ea TLE SI DOPE LL OI feesee ' wi i i : 4 sf y F Ot hea by ia Rab | a sun : ee et TRE tt ata 7 eit ’ ‘separ ee be ETS tile ta eg) eee er ig: i ht eB 1a) i ; 3 Hi r i ree ime a rid mead at da i H i + ay yf ay ' é ' ate ECB) Spa aa aE ‘ id) ee) a Ye a pie ait eine ite 4 ie ao i eed ag aay hee: $ a : : } Lat) ‘ 41, \ Ped cee tall ; ee \ i r)) ; Siti Rie eee ey eS) ; et & : ! us +} 7 ait Hj hades | : i . bY ay eh i ies EA} a birptt ‘ jah i Pao | t ti) ¥. } He 1 ome Bt ee ! ; rat Peay | | ee nan at past eee} ahi Hi eat wie . { ; i ha iieaeet eed i ey hi Hy : vaant eR: | Bgl) ; a Vee 3 Haeue tae 9 12 j i i my Mea He is paeat! ab oie Bees! 4 ay y wast: hota hifi ik if i C3 paged Atri 6) i ig} : ‘ Sa8) | ‘ ; } Hie | i = bE ae RE ate OE ns SRS IRS ne Rana * 2 - ee Sree Baio FRE Picea a eS { e af vl Soe ” ea ell Z - - Ka orcs =~ ~ i n ai a re a 2 - - 3 a a" PEt ~ " rx ——— — a pone nein penne Secaeeee™ [TS PEPER BT Gres ities U Rae ewer es SS a eS SR ST er ee ee” E — --- aie Joncqnesdornss ne or aon 2 aimee te = a ri a aa ee tn cee i ee ee ieee) : 2 hee af ater RS s , a A 452, HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. chemistry and toxicology; William G. Brien, M. D., LL. D., professor of medical jurisprudence; John G. Sinclair, M. D., professor of diseases of the eve. ear and throat; James Y. Crawford, M. D., D. D. 8., professor w . ° s : Rt eae >, Th! ve 7 rT: “oe of prophylactic dentistry and oral surgery; Paul F’. Eve, M. D., William E. McCampbell, M. D., demonstrators of anatomy. At the close of the session of 1882-83 Dr. Humes resigned the pres- idency of the university. The trustees thereupon determined to leave the presidency unfilled for the ensuing year, and gave power to the faculty to elect from their body a chairman clothed with the authority and charged with the duties of a president. So satisfactory was this arrange- ment that it has since been continued. The following are the faculty and officers of the university: Eben Alexander, B. A., chairman of the faculty; Hunter Nicholson, A. M., professor of natural history and ge- ology; Eben Alexander, B. A., protessor of ancient languages and litera- ture; Samuel B. Crawford, M. A., professor of military science and com- mandant of cadets; Rodes Massie, A. M., D. L., professor of En modern languages; John W. Glenn, A. M., professor of agriculture, clish and norticulture and botany; William Albert Noys, Ph. D., professor of chemistry and mineralogy; William W. Carson, C. E., M. E., professor of mathematics; William Everett Moses, B. S., adjunct professor of chem- istry; Samuel B. Crawford, M. A., adjunct professor of mathematics; Thomas Oakley Deaderick, M. A., adjunct professor of ancient lan- ouages; William Gibbs McAdoo, M. A., adjunct professor of Englsh and history; Lewis Conner Carter, C. E., instructor in applied mathe- matics; John Newton Bogart, M. A., instructor in sub-collegiate classes ; William Isaac Thomas, M. A., instructor in modern languages and nat- ural history; Gustav Robert Knabe, Mus. D., instructor in vocal and instrumental music; Hunter Nicholson, A. M., librarian; Robert James Cummings, farm superintendent; Hon. John L. Moses, president of the board of trustees; Robert Craighead, secretary and treasurer. Trustees: Hon. Wiliam B. Bate, governor of Tennessee, ex officio; Hon. John Alli- son, secretary of State, ex officio; Hon. Thomas H. Paine, superintend- ent of public instruction, ex officio; Rev. Thomas W. Humes, S. T. D., Hugh L. McClung, William K. Eckle, Hon. O. P. Temple, Frank A. R. Scott, Robert H. Armstrong, Hon. John Baxter*, B. Frazier, M. D.., William Rule, S. H. Smith, M. D., R. P. Eaton, M. D.. H. L. W. Mynatt, Charles M. McGhee, Hon. D. A. Nunn, Edward J. Sanford. W. A. Hen- derson, Esq., Hon. J. M. Coulter, Rev. James Park, D. D., James D. Cowan, C. Deaderick, M. D., John M. Boyd, M. D., Hon. John L. Moses, Hon. George Brown, A. Caldwell, Ksq., John M. Fleming, Esq., J. W. *Deceased.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 453 Gaut. Samuel J. McKinney, William Morrow, M. D., William B. Reese, Esq., Moses White, Esq., Hon. W. C. Whitthorne, Samuel B. Luttrell, Robert Craighead, James Comfort, Esq., J. B. Killebrew. By an act of Congress, passed in 1846, extinguishing the title to the unappropriated lands south and west of the congressional reservation line, it was required that $40,000 arising from the sale of said lands be set apart for the endowment of a college to be located at Jackson. According- ly, the institution known as West T’ennessee College was chartered in- Before the war it was a prosperous and successful institution, under the administration of able and accomplished presidents and professors, and. many of the most distinguished citizens of the State claim West Tennes- see College as their alma mater. In 1865, immediately after the close of the war, Dr. William Shelton was elected president of the college, with B. W. Arnold as professor of ancient languages, and B. L. Arnold as professor ot mathematics and natural science. Under the administra- tion of Dr. Shelton and his faculty of instruction, West Tennessee Col- lege was built up to a high degree of prosperity, so that it had a larger number of students than at any previous period in its history. In 1869 the entire faculty resigned, and a new faculty was employed, with Rev. E. L. Patton as president. In August, 1874, the buildings, grounds, and endowments of West Tennessee College, estimated at $90,000, were donated to the trustees of the Southwestern Baptist University, on con- dition that an interest bearing endowment of $300,000 be raised for the university within a period of ten years from the time of transfer. A meeting of the Tennessee Baptist Convention was immediately called, the plan accepted, and preliminary steps were taken toward obtaining a charter under the name of the Southwestern Baptist University. On September 14, 1874, the academic department of the new institution was opened, and at the beginning of the next school year the collegiate de- partment was organized. Under=the new name and management the university has been eminently prosperous, and now ranks as one of the best institutions in the State.cae ae catia x - 2 oh Sime ‘3 Re Ss Bae - ay ese 3 ~ Ree get en tte ‘tienen os eS ss Sn BF. cena ee in et Sg mp reise eter. erty, faerema a | Rigas agli Te ON Ree GI a 4 : Re eee ate a ae aDES To ea TT ee: LAA ARE EEN EN a= RES Treen a os ne paimerenid : - 7 NO) - “ é o — ae a eet RUE an EN OE a gO 2 Tag AT SS OS GE 454 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. CHARTER XIY- FIISTORY OF THE EARLY WARS—THE MILITARY TRAINING OF THE “ VOLUNTEER STATE ”—THE TORIES OF EAST TENNESSEE—THE PART BORNE BY THE STATE IN THE REVOLUTION—THE BRILLIANT STRATEGY AND PROWESS OF SEVIER AND SHELBY—ACTIONS AT KING’S MOUNTAIN AND ELSEWHERE—THE WAR OF 1812—J ACKSON’S CAMPAIGNS AGAINST THE CREEKS—THE MEMORABLE BATTLE AT NEW ORLEANS—THE SEMINOLE WAR—ITS HARDSHIPS AND LONG CONTIN- UANCE—TENNESSEEANS CONCERNED IN THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE JNDEPEND- ENCE OF TEXAS—THE WAR WITH MEXICO—THE VOLUNTEERS—SKETCH OF THE CAMPAIGNS. LTHOUGH a peace-loving and law-abiding people, Tennessee has achieved a record in all the wars of the Government or State that is the pride of descendants and the admiration of all beholders. What with the present century finds the inhabitants of the State comparatively a war- Indian wars, and what with the Revolution, the beginning of the like people. The settlers of the mountain region of East Tennessee found it necessary to defend themselves against the Indians at a very early date. Fort Loudon was built by the British, one mile above the mouth of the Tellico River, in 1756. Stimulated by French influence, the Cherokees attacked this fort in 1760, and starved it into surrender on August 8th of that year. The garrison consisted of’ between 200 and 300 Scotch Highlanders, who surrendered on the promise of Oconos- They were followed, and on the second day were overtaken and cut to pieces, tota that they should be allowed a safe return to the Carolinas. except a few, and a fence built of their bones. Other forts were built, which served the colonists a good the troublous times of the Revolution, not only against the British Tories, but The hardy mountaineers of East Tennessee were not numerous, but were in- tensely loyal to the cause of independence, and were the terror of Tories and British. Owing to danger from the Indians the mountaineers dared not leave home but for a short time. purpose during against the Indians. whom British intrigue stirred up to revolt. In 1777 a party of forty men went to Boonesborough, Ky., for the relief of the settlement then besieged by the Indians. The condition of the people became so clesperate that Capt. Logan and a select party undertook the perilous journey of 200 miles through an enemy’s country to ask relief of the pioneers of Tennes- see. ‘I'he appeal was not in vain, for in a short time 100 riflemen* were on their way with supplies to relieve the beleaguered garrison. The fall *Monette.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. LO of Charleston on May 12, 1780, exposed the whole of the Carolinas and Tennessee to the attacks of the British and the Indians. On March 19, 1780, John Sevier, colonel of Washington County mil- itia. under a call of Samuel Rutherford, united with John Wills Wile iam Trimble, James Stinson, John McNabb, Jonathan Tipton and Godfrey Isbell in raising 100 men. ‘The captains of Col. Sevier’s regi- ment were McNabb. Sevier, Hoskins, Bean, Brown, Isbell, Trimble. Willson, Gist, Stinson, Davis, Patterson and Williams. was made upon Isaac Shelby, colonel of Sullivan County, who was then A similar eall absent surveying lands in Kentucky, but a message brought him hur- riedly home. “ ready soon enough, in consequence of which they were not in the disastrous Fortunately for these commanders their forces were not defeat at Camden. Many who before this time were pretended friends now became open enemies to the country. It was determined by the British commander, Cornwallis, to carry the war into the Whig settle- ments beyond the Alleghanies and thence conquer and lay waste North Carolina as he had South Carolina, and advance into Virginia. Col. Sevier soon issued another call for volunteers, and in a few days found himself at the head of 200 men. Col. Shelby, who received word of the impending danger on the 16th of June, was in command of 200 men in the first part of July. The forces of Sevier and Shelby arrived at Col. McDowell’s camp at Cherokee Ford on Broad River, about the same time. Col. Moore, who was assembling a large body of Tories, took post at a strong fort built by Gen. Williamson on the Pacolet River. The successes of the British led many disaffected to his standard. The rapid advance of the main force of the British led Col. MeDowell to strike a blow at once. Cols. Sevier, Shelby and Clarke were detached with 600 men to attack Moore forthwith. line of march at sunset and by daylight had marched twenty miles and These riflemen took up their had surrounded the fort. Lines’ wére deployed and ready to assault : Col. Shelby sent William Cocke to demand the surrender of the fort. Moore refused and declared he would defend the place to, ther last) exe The American lines were drawn closely around the fort and « tremity. anxiously awaited the order for assault, when a second demand was made, intimating that if they were compelled to assault it might be difficult to restrain the mountaineers from acts of violence. Moore acceded to the terms of surrender on condition that the garrison should be paroled not to serve again during the war. ‘The forces surrendered, consisting of ninety-three Loyalists and a British sergeant-major, who was the drill- master. Besides the men, there was a large supply of arms and other supplies. Col. Ferguson, who commanded the British, determined to oe Pe ell : ee oe toecea aes ~— a ara he. sae Ses Se Tape man npr dene —eomnprenine nye agdis nes ra alta cis s alia Nig edie eayetacciper sp Re, 5 3 “ - area nid, ba om mage ed tie cas eee too Sent ae ayer ye = Seneca ues anarnaieiragth ean ee ae ee oo cae in te eeecee , : mee 4 { - : = : ss —_ . - on eee EE ee ee — 2 Pr Aes . ai r awe — J = SSS se aan Se x x 6 er sete oo ao ee ne = om *r st a E ait EE oes mts my iy Bp ns r me oie ee en tn SPE aa ER —~ - rae Tse Shek . 2: Digan mee = = ae = = . ie ET EE " egal i atl * Hae vl ie ii nl 1 AE Bed ihe ett + ag ivi ie} anny bs ip ge | eet 41'S f Re i rae AOU i is its 4 { eee i eat i! RE eaeis hi ff ' i i HL atest m1 ae PRA i} f ' 9 eal Be Ea en En HLT CTR 3 B | ; a SE ft t 143 { ij i hy ithe anal at | Hi eat | Hy | | if ba TR ah Bale AGAR a f f 4+} es i lee i} tii ee ; cE i; A rey AH i Pray ei { i 1! yae te peR lead Hi | Pye abe Ea Pee i { i F i | Pi lt | } vith FR aah Hl | ane 456 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. erush the forces of McDowell. ‘The only hope of the latter was to annoy and cut off straggling forces of the enemy, now amounting to about 6,000 c / - » Se C—O . = Wel ie ee men Fereuson’s pl Cols. Shelby and A A . = > . “ J ‘ bavalern GbacSenae S Ae : nai Clarke. with 600 men, were attacked at Cedar Springs in August by a Thev maintained the fight for half an hour, when an was to surprise Me Dowell. Qo large British force. G Ferguson’s whole force arrived and compelled the Americans to with- draw, taking with them twenty prisoners, including two British officers. The American loss was ten or twelve killed and wounded, ineluding Col. larke. who received a sabre cut in the neck. ke of the Americans was at a band of 400 or 500 Tories en- re The next stro camped on the south side of the Enoree River at Musgrove’s mill, about fortv miles distant from the Americans. Col. MeDowell, the American com- Ferguson’s main force lay be- tween the Americans and their prize. mander, detached Cols. Shelby, Clarke and Williams, of South Carolina, to surprise and capture these Tories. They started on the 18th of August, and after a hard night’s ride reached the object of their search. In the march they had been compelled to make a detour of several miles to About a half mile from the enemy’s camp they It was avoid Ferguson’s men. met a patrol and a skirmish ensued and the enemy gave way. now learned that the enemy had received a re-enforcement of 600 regu- lars. The Americans were inadilemma. ‘To fight these seemed des- perate; to retreat was impossible, beimg worn as they were. The sound of drums and bugles indicated the advance of the British. Capt. Inman was sent forward to fight the advancing line and retreat at discretion. He met the British gallantly and retreated slowly to within range of the main forces. These maintained their ground for more than an hour; just as the Americans were about to give way Col. Ennes, the 3ritish com- mander, was wounded; nearly all of his subalterns had already been killed or wounded. The British gave way. Capt. Inman was killed while gallantly leading his men; only six or seven others were lost. The British regulars fought bravely, but over 200 were captured. The next point the Americans aimed at was Ninety-Six, thirty miles away. At the moment of starting a message was received from Col. McDowell, stating that Gen. Gates had been overwhelmed at Camden, and advising the Americans to save themselves as best they could. The 200 prisoners, the spoils of the victory, were divided among the men, giving one to each of the three Americans. ‘Thus encumbered they started for their mountain fastnesses, and by a ride of all that day, the following night and the next day, arrived ata place of safety, not, how- ever, without having been pursued by a strong force under Maj. Dupois- ter, sent by Ferguson. Their forces were for a time scattered. TheHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 457 near approach of the British and threatening of Ferguson to cross the mountains to attack the Tennesseeans in their homes, called them together again. News reached Col. Shelby of the danger in August, and he immediately rode fifty or sixty miles to consult with Sevier. In two days they determined to raise all the forces they could, and if possible surprise Ferguson in his camp. They appointed September 25 as the day of meeting, and Sycamore Shoals on the Watauga as the place. The whole fighting population of the district was considerably less than 1,000, and at least half of these were deemed necessary to guard the forts and the frontier. Only the strong and vigorous were allowed to go. The whole population met at the camp on the Watauga. Here they were met by Col. Campbell, of Virginia, with 400 men. Col. Sevier took 240 from Washington County, Col. Shelby the same number from Sullivan County; alsoa great many Whig refugees were assembled under Col. McDowell. Steadman, who served under Cornwallis, says: ‘‘ The enemy was composed of the wild and fierce inhabitants of Kentucky and other settlements beyond the Alleghanies, who had assembled from different places and with different objects. They were under such leaders as Cleveland, Shelby, Sevier, Branden and Lacey; the men were well mounted on horseback and armed with rifles, and each carried his own provisions in a wallet. and were not encumbered by wagons.” Hach man, each officer set out with his trusty Deckhard on his shoulder. A shot-pouch, a tomahawk, a knife, a knapsack and a blanket completed his outfit. The earth was his bed, the heavens his covering, the moun- tain stream gave him drink and the forests yielded him food. These men started in rapid movement along mountain paths toward Gilbert Town where Ferguson was en camped. The desertion of two men caused them to change their course a little. When nearing the foot of the moun- tains they fell in with others bent on-doing the British mischief. Some of these men were well armed, some not; some were on foot and some mounted. This motley crew chose a leader of their own and determined to attack the British. Ferguson became alarmed at this “inundation of barbarians and dogs of mankind,” and called loudly for the loyalists to rally to his standard. On October 4 the Americans reached Gilbert Town to find that Fer- euson had decamped and was earnestly soliciting Cornwallis for re-en- forcements. It was soon agreed among the American commanders to select the best men, horses and arms and follow Ferguson with all speed. Nine hundred and ten men out of nearly 3,000 were chosen to lead the pursuit, the others to follow as rapidly as possible. Several bands of Tories offered tempting baits for these brave mountaineers, but these they scence seinen asian isis tinta : = Fr ya en des ae aes eT E nals SS eeepc tee ROPES arOTAE re os i ee eS F SO eee se - ~- hd nen ‘ — oan eS es ty 3, = -> sino r 2 = ‘ cs ere: ig iF 4 aes ~ amen, + ER a Gh PREY Ta eS os 3 = wo cea o ~- 7 | ee ae 4 es a a = - = Is = e 2 | 7 7 er eat ss se serra “esi mee em: met . = SA alt ane EER ES ee re — Pa a ip ao Se 8 SS ee _ eae a a ae Pe a gs ernen 458 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. did not care to disturb, well knowing if the British regulars were dis- posed of the Tories would be an easy prey. For thirty-six hours these men rode with but one hour’s rest, and the day of battle was hot and so wet that the men were compelled to wrap their guns with their blankets or hunting-shirts to keep them dry. ‘The men were now within three miles of the British camp. It was learned the British intended to join Cornwallis next day, and the Americans determined not to allow the chance for victory to slip, so without food or rest they prepared for the onset. The touch-holes of their guns were cleaned and fresh priming was put in, bullets were examined and a plan of the battle was hastily formed. Ferguson had taken post on an eminence, which in loyalty to his sovereign he called King’s Mountain. The Americans dismounted and began the attack. ‘Their plan was to surround the mountain. Cols. McDowell, Shelby, Sevier and Campbell passed to the right, and Ham- bright, Chronicle, Cleveland and Williams to the left, so as to join the wings in the rear of the mountain. All things being ready, they raised the Indian war-whoop and advanced upontheenemy. The battle was of the most desperate character. As the British regulars charged bayonets, the Americans, by an understanding, slowly yielded on that side, but ad- vanced on the other, and then the British were ealled to resist the great pressure elsewhere, when the Americans again advanced their lines. The Americans fought as only American mountaineers could fight, the British regulars with the desperation of despair. Prodigies of valor were performed by Sevier, Shelby and, in fact, all the officers and men. No less valorous was Ferguson of the British. Courting danger and disdaining death, he seemed everywhere present. Twice was the white flag raised and twice pulled down or cut down by his'own hands. He had sworn that all the rebels out of ——— could not drive him from his position, and no —— band of banditti could intimidate him or the Brit- ish regulars. The fight continued hot and desperate. At last Ferguson fell, and the animating spirit of the British was gone. Dupoister, second in command, seeing resistance useless, raised the white flag. In the hour’s engagement the enemy lost 225 killed and 180 wounded, and 700 prisoners and all their stores. Not one of the Brit- ish escaped. The prisoners were more numerous than the whole foree to guard them. The loss to the Americans was 1 colonel, 1 mayor, 1 captain, 2 lieutenants, 4 ensigns and 19 privates killed; and 1 major, 3 captains, 3 lieutenants and 53 privates wounded. In Col. Shelby’s regiment from Sullivan County his brother Moses was wounded in a bold attempt to storm the enemy. ‘The captains of his regiment were Elhott, Maxwell and Webb. The Washington County troops wereHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 459 commanded by Col, Sevier, whose captains were his brothers Valen- tine and Robert Sevier, Joel Callahan, George Doherty and George Rus- sell; lieutenant, Isaac Lane. Capt. Robert Sevier was mortally wounded in the engagement. There were four privates of the Qe farmil present, Abraham and Joseph Sevier; also James and Joseph Savion sons of Col. Sevier. Swords were voted to Cols. Sevier and Shelby by the State of North Carolina in honor of the signal victory. Steadman quotes Gen. Bernard, an officer under Napoleon, as saying: “The Americans, by their victory in that engagement, erected a monument to perpetuate the memory of the brave men, who had fallen there; and the shape of the hill itself would be an eternal monument of the military genius and skill of Col. Ferguson in selecting a position so well adapted for defense; and that no other plan of assault but that pursued by the mountain men, could have succeeded against him.” ‘The effect of this victory could not be over-estimated. The Sabbath following the battle was employed in the solemn burial of the dead and rapid retreat to the remaining forces of the army. ‘The wagons of the enemy were burned, the badly wounded were left on the ground and the able bodied were compelled to carry the arms they had surrendered. The prisoners were turned over to Gen. Greene at Hillsboro and Col. Sevier and most of the militia returned to defend their homes against the Indians. Soon after followed the victory of Gen. Morgan over Tarleton at Cowpens, scarcely less decisive then the one at King’s Mountain. The Legislature of North Carolina, Gov. Caswell of the same State and Gen. Greene, all besought Cols. Shelby and Sevier to come to the relief of the State, that was now (1781) invaded by the British under Cornwallis, and the country laid waste by the tories. Neither of the leaders, Shelby or Sevier, could go, as it took them and the militia to de- fend the settlements of Watauga and Nollichucky against the Cherokees. A few only were engaged at Guilford Court House on March 15, 1781. It is thought if these men could have gone in foree the same fate would have befallen Cornwallis at that place that awaited him at Yorktown. On the advance of Gen. Greene into South Carolina the forces of Shelby and Sevier were again called upon, and they assembled at Fort Granby in the last of August, 1781. They were well on their way when it was learned that Cornwallis and the main British forces had left North Car- olina and taken post at Yorktown. Va. The various successes led the Americans—Shelby and Sevier—to believe their services would no longer be needed, in consequence of which they again returned home. The battle of Eutaw Spring was fought in the absence of the gallant Tennes- a see mountaineers. and they were not permitted to gain new laurels. The eee eee gen = SraPe i ma i amet— RS Sa 2 ee PCAN ee gars {RT RELA ERE TH a "oa " er Rea . r , et | oo? Sanaa ga pre == oe i ORs PAE ORT A AAC, CUO om z ae ( i 3 aoeere ee” \ i ep main aS SS gd A 7 eit. sete os es ie rm LOGI i: Nt ae “ * om jae ua aw | Sr ae fie gees = RTE = | Bo ‘ a near ae oii : . SS i ae ee a es geht aS | i mete. ee a eee , See eee at eee 34 = ¥ we at wa ee ec saa - ae vr A oe F - ae ——~ Saaeanseser . 7 ; 1 ee moments oR AE RI SNE ~ a gat ie oe se’ seta ttm OR ET = ROE BST RT SY vane bab he te =e po = ei aaae a 5. Sr — Silene ca supa ar areca macs 2 ie eR ath saiig ha dn nee eget - Bids so rads rai cae ak aguas i ‘ a ” > so Rm TR aco a te — me ns haa sa aiaetows “= REG Som - na —— a 2 7 ener AsiaaTNon ; i ee Se ens ~ Somer ee - —— es oe RIE 460 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. straits to which Cornwallis had been reduced by the allied armies led Gen. Greene to believe that he contemplated a retreat through the Caro- linas. Gen. Greene, on September 16, again called upon Col. Sevier for assistance. Shelby was also called upon and responded with his regi- ment. Sevier Paiced 200 men from Washington County. On October 19 Cornwallis surrendered his whole force, and thus danger from that quarter was no longer apprehended. | oe At the request of Gen. Greene the forces of Shelby and Sevier joined the forces under Gen. Marion. Notwithstanding these men had been enrolled for only sixty days they proceeded into South Carolina. It was learned that AOLCE of several hundred Hessians stationed at Monk’s Corner was in a state of mutiny. The main force of the British was at Ferguson’s Swamp, eight or ten miles away on the main road leading to Charleston. It was determined to surprise the British force. Cols. Shelby and Sevier asked to be a part of the detachment of 500 or 600 men to be sent against it. Col. Mayhem commanded the forces; consist- ing of 180 of his own dragoons, a few militia and the men under Shelby and Sevier. The march began in the morning and a long march brought them two miles below the post they intended to attack, on the evening of the second day. In gaining this post they had avoided the main British force and were now between the Hessians and Charleston. The men rested on their arms till daylight the next morning, when they ap- peared before the British post and Col. Mayhem sent a messenger demanding the immediate surrender of the place. Answer was returned in a few minutes that the post would be defended to the last extremity. Shelby then asked permission to go himself and demand the surrender, He told the British commander that if they were compelled to storm the post, every soul within would be killed, as the mountaineers would soon be upon them with their tomahawks. The British officer inquired of Shelby if he had any artillery, to which he replied that he had guns that would blow them to atoms in a minute. The British offi- cer then gracefully yielded and threw open the gates, and the Ameri- cans marched up and took possession. At this moment another strong post was discovered 500 or 600 yards distant. It was a brick house sur- rounded by a strong abatis and defended by 100 soldiers and from 40 to OU dragoons. These made a demonstration as if to attack the Americans, who deployed and boldly advanced toward the British and demanded a surrender. ‘This post also surrendered without resistance. Although well fortified, 150 men capitulated. Ninety of the prisoners were mounted behind their captors and were taken to Marion’s camp sixty miles distant; the remainder were paroled and the post and supplies de-ANDREW JACKSON heen IN , ESTA z BA he ans tote ie alk < ea eaeSn OO EO an ye Sony ox Thy seu Ss enn is sancti mmeeser ars case canner clea a > us " a . x Ties = 2 aw {oye eg 7 One ee ee Be stare oie ~~ “ro ant ea ~ a, Se sine ° a le aa | wr 2 : a ee eee a PATA eT 1D RN IES Re mee * - : f Sl a tae in ey ee Ee lie eS eeTS. SN a nh gE Lato eee i ee a Sates Sesh ne ieaapecing Secor omentiean TESS pn Sea cat aaa Neer cree remap sete penta a aa mena eran ae T SRE i iat} Re pe nea) ae t ap ni ie ait eh Hi Wet ain Hit f oi {I ij it (heal aabe ht eal it i a eR Ep a a iaricinnaly pi aianenesiotvtang epee eT ee ii teadl it EY iti \ ; | omee HISTORY OF TENNESSEER. 461 stroyed. The Americans reached camp next morning at 8 o'clock. Before day it was reported that Stewart with the whole British force was ina few miles of camp. Shelby and Sevier’s men were to interfere and retreat at discretion. A report spread that Marion had received a laree re-enforcement of riflemen. The British became alarmed and fled in dis- order almost to Charleston. About the 28th of November Shelby left the army to take a seat in the Legislature of North Carolina, of which he was amember. Col. Sevier remained with the mountain men. Little more was done until peace ended the strife. The troops of Shelby and Sevier ‘‘came home enriched with no spoils, stained with no dishonor, enriched only by an imperishable fame, an undying renown and an un- questionable claim to the admiration and gratitude of their countrymen and of posterity.” Hard upon the war with the British and Tories came the war with the Cherokees. Thesecond struggle for independence, that of 1812, was the occasion of the Creek war. As soon as there was a prospect for hostilities, Great Britain sent her emissaries among the Indians to induce them to ‘dig up the hatchet.” Tecumseh, the great Shawanee chieftain, with about thirty of his warriors visited the Southern Indians in his efforts to unite all the various tribes in one grand union against the whites. He estab- lished among the Southern Indians the custom of celebrating the scalp and war dance before battle. The speech of Tecumseh, his power of organization, and the message of the prophet, Tecumseh’s brother, stirred the Creeks to a frenzy, and caused them to plunge into a religious war, neither asking nor giving quarter. Numerous outrages had been commit- ted, and the massacre of Fort Mimms, on August 30, 1813, spread alarm throughout Tennessee. A meeting was called in Nashville of which Rey. Mr. Craighead was made chairman and Gen. Coffee was a member. This meeting urged the Legislature to call out the militia to take ven- geance upon the Creeks. That body responded at once, and on September 13, 1813, a call was made for 3,500 volunteers in addition to 1,500, who had already hastily entered the field and appropriated $300,000 to defray the expenses of the war. Gov. Blount commissioned Gen. Cocke to command the troops from East Tennessee, and Gen. Jackson those from West Tennessee (now called Middle Tennessee). Although suffer- ing from the wounds received in the encounter with the Bentons, Gen. Jackson issued one of his characteristic addresses to the people on Sep- tember 25, ordering the men to rendezvous at Fayetteville on October 4. On September 26 Gen. Coffee was sent to Huntsville in advance of the main body for the purpose of protecting the citizens of the valley of the Tennessee against the threatened attack by the Indians. Gen. Jackson 29 yin ee a RO herein PERE ARL Hocta Tae ai iy Saas a alin nh a Faken aia, a a aC aE nets = ~ ae ence tee C—O OE Nl nas caciny eee: 462 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. himself did not arrive at Fayetteville till the 7th, owing to his disability. He. however, sent his aid, Maj. Reid. in advance to read his orders and to put the men under discipline. On the 11th a dispatch was received by Jackson that 1,000 Creek warriors were approaching to attack Huntsville. News was received at { o'clock, and at 3 the army was in motion. By a forced march the army reached Huntsville, a distance of Pere miles, in about five hours. On their arrival the rumor was found to be untrue, but the army continued its march, but more leisurely to Ditto’s Landing, on the Tennessee. Jackson’s forces consisted of two brigades; one of volunteers under Gen. William Hall, and the other of militia under Gen. Isaac Roberts. Jackson marched up the river to Thompson's Creek, cutting out roads as he went. He was greatly dis- appointed at not receiving supplies that were to be sent from East Ten- nessee. ‘Lhe low stage of the water above prevented, but this was not ‘ndicated below and led to some bitterness. Jackson built and entrenched a camp, and called it Fort Deposit. While awaiting supples he drilled his men, and wrote letters to Gov. 3lount, Judge Hugh L. White, and other prominent men urging the necessity OL rapid movements. The army was reduced to the greatest straits, and it was with great difficulty that discipline was maintained. (ol. Coffee was sent to scour the country for supplies, and returned in a short time with a quantity of corn. Gen. Jackson broke camp at Fort Deposit October 25, and advanced into the country and built Fort Strother. He learned that the friendly Indians at Two Islands of the Coosa were in danger, and went to their rescue. He learned there was a large body of Indians at Tallushatches, thirteen miles distant, on the south side of the Coosa; thither he sent Col. Coffee with 1,000 mounted men to attack them. They were piloted by friendly Indians. The Indians were sur- prised and defeated with great slaughter. The attack began on the morning of the 3d. Col. Allen, who commanded the right wing, managed to get to the rear of the Indians. They fought with the desperation of despair, and nota warrior was captured. They left 186 warriors upon the field, and doubtless more were killed. A number of women and children were killed and 84 were captured. - The Indians fired their guns and then used bows and arrows. Jackson’s loss was 5 killed and 41 wounded ; among whom were Capts. Smith, Bradley and Winston. An Indian infant was found upon its dead mother’s breast. The other women refused to nourish it. Gen. Jackson had the child cared for and took it into his own family. Young Lincolyer was given a practi al education, and found a warm friend in the General and his family. He was taken away by con- sumption at the age of seventeen.HISTORY OF TENNESSER. 463 Gen. Jackson began again with great energy and next struck the In- dians at Talladega, about thirty miles from his camp, at Fort Strother. Here he left his sick and wounded with a small guard, having made the place as secure as possible. He expected a junction of a part of the force of Gen. Cocke, who was operating in concert with him with the East Tennessee troops. Gen. White, with a brigade of these troops, had arrived at Turkey Town, twenty-five miles from Jackson’s camp. ‘These were or dered by Gen. Jackson to join him in the advance upon Talladega. When near Fort Strother White received an order from Gen. Cocke to join him. Jackson advanced upon Talladega on December 8, and when within six miles of the place he learned that White had been ordered to join Gen. Cocke. His sick and wounded men being in danger, he determined to fight alone the next morning. Talladega was a fortified place, and was filled with friendly Indians who were being besieged by the hostile Creeks, It was for their relief that the battle was fought. The Indians were on the point of starvation. One disguised as a hog crept through the hostil lines, and brought Jackson word as to their condition. — Seouts brough him information as to the number and position of the enemy. ‘The marc) was resumed at 4.0’clock on the morning of the 9th; when within a mik, of the enemy the line of battle was formed. Hall’s brigade was on the right and Roberts’ on the left, and Coffee’s cavalry covered the wings, with a portion in the rear for reserve. When Capt. Deaderick’s men arrived within eighty yards of the enemy they rose and with a yell opened fire and began an advance. Some of the militia under Gen. Rob- erts began to give way, frightened by the terrible yells of the Indians. The reserve under Col. Dyer boldly advanced and restored the line, when the militia again returned to the fight. A general advance along the whole line was now made. ‘The Indians were slaughtered unmercifully ; a gap in the lines alone allowed any to escape. They lost 280 killed; Gen. Coffee says 299. The loss of the whites was 15 killed and 85 wounded. ‘he Indians numbered 1,000; Jackson’s forces numbered about 2,000, not more than half of whom were engaged. Great was the joy of the besieged Indians when they were relieved. Jackson now returned to Fort Strother, but to find no supplies. A week’s starvation brought the army to a state of mutiny. The troops threatened to march home in a body, but Jackson persuaded them to de- lay two days longer, in which case, if there were no supplies, he would allow them to go. The time came but no supplies. The men started home but Jackson went with them. On the way provisions were met with, but it required the utmost firmness to force them to return. There was a difference of opinion as to when the term of enlistment expired.464 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The 10th of December was set as the time for their departure for home. Col. William Martin was commander of one of the mutinous regiments. Gen. Jackson had the men brought out in front of the army, with men on either flank and the artillery in front, ready to fire in case the men p ran 1 / S moved, After a sharp dispute between Gen. Jackson and Col. Martin ~ ny * Zs “ie a be . e : the matter was dropped for the time being. Gen. Cocke joined Gen. Jackson’s forces at Fort Strother with 2,000 Hast Tennessee troops on December 13, 1813. The time of the men having expired, all except mS . 2 © > Y ‘ Y about 800 were discharged. In the meantime Gen. Coffee, Col. Carroll and Rev. Gideon Blackburn had been very active In raising recruits for i : r the army to support Gen. Jackson at Fort Strother. The new troops were under Cols. Higgins and Perkins and amounted to about 900 men; there were two spy companies under Capts. Russell and Gordon and one artillery company under Lieut. Robert Armstrong. Besides these there ve v 5 5 \ : sc was a body of the old riflemen under Gen. Coffee. A large force of “ friendly Indians accompanied the expedition. The foree started on the 13th of January. The object was not only to defeat the Indians, but. particularly to keep up the spirits of the men. On the 20th they en- =~ ~albe a “a as = : cee > E Zi eee a RTT SRS SETTER eae AA PARES TN 2 a a nc ee Teale Bie Sean 5 Relnpanng IE Mn eT a Ti , 3 = re | 2 eR eet 3 Sage ——— --- + 5 . - . * . Sorat left Nashville on January 22 and joined his forces. He started with twenty days’ rations. He experienced the same difficulties as in 1813-14. Se [ Supplies were ordered to be shipped from New Orleans to Fort Scott, ms470 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. where he arrived on March 9, a distance of 450 miles, with 1,100 hungry men. This was accomplished in forty-six days. Before arriving at Fort Scott he was joined by McIntosh. now a brigadier-general in the United States Army, with 2,000 Indians. Perceiving the Spanish were giving aid to the Indians, Jackson de- termined to capture Fort St. Mark’s, a Spanish fort. He left Negro Fort, now rebuilt and called Fort Gadsden, on March 26, and arrived before St. Mark’s April 7. On his way he destroyed several Indian towns. On the 8th Jackson entered St. Mark’s, and hauled down the Spanish flag and ran up the American flag, notwithstanding the protest of the Spanish ATE or: Ste E ira = . i) ne ass Se ae ROE : ' 4 f a an nt =p nana re ao Ee F Sets Oke ee i Estep 2 mae 3 " “ = << eet a TITER: SPR et ay Lee ns eee oe ‘ eee = ican — chobee, and on the resignation of Gen. Jessup the whole conduct of the war was entrusted to him. His policy was to earry out the stipulations of the existing treaty. As’ fast as a sufficient number of Indians were captured or gave themselves up, they were sent to the reservation. By 1839 he had sent 1.900 to their future homes. The war could not be said to be closed till 1842, with a loss of 1,466 lives by disease, such as yellow fever and other diseases pecular to that climate, and by Indian bullets and scalping knives, and an expense of $10,000,000. Texas was early an inviting field for adventurous speculators and per- sons seeking homes. Many, after the Creek and Seminole wars, went there from a spirit of adventure alone. The disturbed condition of that unfortunate republic, with its periodical revolutions, compelled those living in Texas to protect themselves against the aggressions of the Mex- ican Government. Among the most distinguished men living in Texas was Gen. Sam Houston, of Tennessee, who had won renown in the Creek war, also had been distinguished as a political leader. The settlers of Texas were largely American, and the tyranny of Mexico led them to rey- olution. Many old friends and companions in arms of Houston flocked to his standard, he at this time being at the head of the revolution. Af- ter varying turns of fortune, a decisive victory was gained at San Jacinto on April 21, 1836, which resulted in the complete discomfiture of the Mexican forces and the capture of Santa Anna, the Mexican president. While a prisoner, he signed with the Texans their treaty of independ- ence. The State maintained its independence for ten years, though after ——— 7 <= = EE AT aS NE amie err rae Seen rxHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 473 the release of Santa Anna, he disavowed the act done by himself, on the ground of its being done while a prisoner of war. Texas made applica- tion for admission into the American Union. This was bitterly opposed by the Mexican authorities on the ground that she had never acknowl- edged the independence of Texas, and that Texas was still a part of the Mexican Government. This became a question in American polities. The elections of 1844 were favorable to the issue of the Texan admission. Mexico claimed sovereignty not only over all Texas, but particularly that part lying between the Nueces and the Rio Grande Rivers. A threatened invasion of this territory on the part of the Mexican authorities, led the American Government to send Gen. Taylor with a large force of United States troops into the disputed territory to take post at Corpus Christi, at the mouth of the Nueces. After some negotiations for peace, on March 8 1846, Gen. Taylor advanced to Point Isabel, thence in a few days to the point on the Rio Grande opposite Matamoras. On his arrival Anere Ampudia notified Gen. Taylor that his forces must quit the territory be- tween the Rio Grande and the Nueces within twenty-four hours, or risk the consequences. Taylor’s communications with Point Isabel, his base of supplies, were threatened by Mexican cavalry. He went with his main force to open communications, and in his absence, his works at Matamoras were attacked and Maj. Brown was killed. In honor of him the American work was called Fort Brown. On May 8 Gen. Taylor in his return to Matamoras encountered Gen. Ampudia at Palo Alto. An engagement ensued and the Mexicans were forced to retreat with a loss of 600 men. The American loss was 6 killed and 44 wounded. Another battle was fought on the 9th at Resaca de la Palma, in which the Mexicans were again defeated, with a loss of 1,000 men, the American’loss being only 110. On the announcement of these engagements, it was stated that American blood had been shed on Amer- ean soil. The President declared that war existed between the United States and Mexico, and called for 50,000 volunteers. Congress immediately appropriated $10,000,000 for carrying on the war. The apportionment of volunteers for Tennessee was 2,000, and Gov. A. V. Brown called for that number. It was finally agreed to accept 2,400 men, 1,600 infantry, and 800 cavalry. Such was the spirit for volunteering, that it became a question, not as to who must go, but who may go. It was remarked that a draft would be necessary to compel men to stay at home. The State was divided into four military districts: one in East, two in Middle and one in West Tennessee. The volunteers of the middle division consisted of the Harrison Guards—Captain R. C. Foster; Lieutenants A. Heiman and cpeugseemareetn neon =I” ee Se eee amen a eS amos 7 Sas ary Si, ape Pe a anion ie =a ; Saee et ow ee ee hig oe ete et a - Seer eeaeelNy - FRE A pe ae Br ; . “TRE " Pe: eee : ESE ae , _- - Site i : a — “ — ss ~ PO PMPae re Tet 1. ERR SP ? " ie ' : = : - Pens arenes _— —— ee a . = es : Sere a = =~ a aim = eee se wm sth yn - Pe Rie =e - we 2 a = sl ": oe a crea em 4 one ran hee en ol bape RS = etal _ er es — : . [ea ie re 3 > . —. ess | - sical meres ‘ _ = : , ~ a jae See re. one aie a Taegan Palas a - pibinnihina -dileinehacinentiedaanmin ated sc pam come - Sa a NH co A ete Ft lg Sn eer pi 474 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. George Maney; the Nashville Blues—Captain B. F. Cheatham; Lieuten- ants William R. Bradfute, and E. Eastman; Shelbyville Guards—Captain Edward Frierson; Lieutenants J. L. Seudder and G. W. Buchanan; the Polk Guards—Captain R. A. Bennett; Lieutenants J. M. Shaver and Patrick Duffey; Tenth Legion—Captain S. R. Anderson; Lieutenants Wilham M. Blackmore and P. L. Solmon; Union Boys—Captain W. B. Walton; Lieutenants Samuel High and C. W. Dixon; Dixon Spring Guards —Captain L. P. McMurray; Lieutenants W. Bradley and James Lanahan,; Lincoln Guards—Captain Pryor Buchanan; Lieutenants A. L. Fulton and J.V. Myers. Lawrenceville Blues—Captain A.S. Alexander; Lieutenants James Burkitt and G. H. Nixon. Hickory Guards—Captain J. Whit- field; Lieutenants J. B. Easley and L. P. Totty. Richland Guards— Captain H. Mauldin; Lieutenants W. P. Davis and W. H. McCrory. Mountain Blues—Captain A. Northeutt; Lieutenants E. M. Mercer and J. J. Hill. These men rendezvoused at the race course near Nashville. The regiment was organized June 3, 1846; William B. Campbell, of Smith County, colonel; Samuel R. Anderson, of Sumner County, heutenant-col- onel: Richard Alexander, of Smith County, first major, and Robert Far- quharson, of Lincoln County, second major; Adolphus Heiman was made adjutant; Dr. McPhail, surgeon, and W. D. Morris, assistant sur- geon. ‘These companies were constituted the First Regiment. Betore leaving for the seat of war a beautiful flag was presented to the regi- ment by Miss Irene C. ‘Taylor, in behalf of the young ladies of the Nash- ville Female Academy. On the 4th and 5th of June they left Nashville for New Orleans. The Second Regiment was ordered to assemble at Camp Carroll, near Memphis, on June 15, 1846. These men were sworn into the service by Gen. Hay. The forces consisted of the Tennessee Guards, Capt. H. P. Maney; Avengers, Capt. T. P. Jones; Memphis Rifle Guards, Capt. E. F. Ruth; Gaines Guards, Capt. M. B. Cook. In addition to these were the following cavalry companies: Fayette Cavalry, Capt. J. Lenow, and the Eagle Guards, Capt. W. N, Porter. From East Tennessee came the Knoxville Dragoons, under Capt. Caswell; Claiborne Blues, Capt. Evans, and the Rhea Jounty Cavalry, Capt. Waterhouse. The infantry companies from this section were Capt. Standifer, from Hamilton; Capt. Lowery, from McMinn; Capt. McCown, from Sevier, and Capt. R. L. Kilpatrick, from Anderson, instead of Capt. Barnett, of Sul- livan. The officers of the Second Tennesse were J. E. Thomas, colonel; R. D. Allison, lieutenant-colonel, and Richard Waterhouse. major. The cavalry of this division moved by way of Little Rock, Fulton, San Antonio and joined Gen. Taylor at Matamoras. Each regiment and company was given an ovation on their departure. The First Regiment,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. AUD consisting of twelve companies, embarked at New Orleans on June 17, and arrived on the Brazos early in July, and were stationed at Camargo till August 29, when the rest of the men were called to assist in the capt- ure of Monterey. The hot weather and climatic causes made a worse havoe in the ranks than Mexican bullets. The regiments were soon sadly depleted before seeing any active service. The First Regiment was attached to Gen. Quitman’s brigade and the Second to Gen. Gideon J. Pillow’s brigade. The line of march for Monterey was taken up on Sep- tember 7, and on the 19th the army was within five miles of the city. The 20th was employed in preparing for battle. The American forces consisted of about 6,000 troops, the city was defended by about 10,000 Mexicans. The battle was fouhgt on the 2\st. The city was strongly fortified and stood at the foot of the Sierra Nevada. The points of defense were Taneria and the Black Fort on the east and Bishop’s Palace on the west. The Tennessee troops were to the left on the east. Their eager- ness to measure strength with their enemies was intense. The guns from Fort Taneria greeted them with both musketry and artillery fire and the bloody work began. They were within eighty yards of the works before they fired on the Mexicans, although they were suffering terribly. As the fire of the Americans opened the fire of the Mexicans slackened. A rush was made for the parapets and the flag of the First was the first planted on the battlements of Monterey. Of 350 men in the charge 105 were lost. ' Among these 26 were killed, 77 were wounded and 2 were missing. From private to colonel every man acted gallantly. The city of Monterey capitulated on the 25th. After the surrender of the city an armistice of four months followed, during which time efforts for peace were made. The truce having ended a large portion of Taylor’s men were withdrawn and given to Gen. Scott, who was meditating a descent upon Vera Cruz. The movement began December 14. In the meantime the two Tennessee regiments had been placed in the brigade of Gen. Pillow. On December 14 the troops started for Tampico, the place of embarkation. They were finally landed at Vera Cruz on March 9, 1847, and approaches were begun. The siege guns opened on the city on the 29d. and continued till the 27th. On the 26th a detachment of six companies of the First and Second Tennessee Regiments was as- signed the duty of assaulting a barricade defending Madeline Bridge. The battalion was led by Col. Haskell. Capt. Foster was the first to leap upon the work. ‘The place was carried with little loss. The city of Vera Cruz and the strong castle of San Juan de Ulloa surrendered on the 29th. Gen. Scott’s army began its march toward the City of Mexico April 9, and on the 18th, his progress was disputed at Cerro Gordo. In lg nae Re A See a SER ard w ry 2 eee » * pase ee Snead a ae : = et ae = is a See, ee ee Se Eas eg476 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. the assault that followed the Tennesseeans were on the left of the line. The assault was vigorous but the Second, entangled in the chapparal in | front of the works, suffered terribly. The loss in the two regiments was 79, 8 being from the First and the remainder being from the Second. | Gen. Pillow was among the wounded, ‘The army then moved forward to Jalapa. The time of service of the Tennesseeans having expired the remaining portion of the regiments were sent to New Orleans, where they were mustered out. Gen. Scott moved his army on to Pueblo, where he was compelled to await re-enforcements to fill his much depleted ranks. A call was made on Tennessee for two additional regiments, the Third a ‘ awnanarenn -agetahlie and the Fourth, and a battalion of six companies called the Fourteenth. Capt. B. F. Cheatham was largely instrumental in raising the Third. It was composed of the companies of Capt. Chambliss, from Giles and Mar- shal Counties, Capt. Solomon, of Sumner; Capt. Whitfield, of Hickman: Capts. Trigg and Bradfute, of Davidson; Capt. Collyer, of Franklin; Capt. Douley, of Rutherford and Coffee; Capt.—,of De Kalb; Capt. Anderson, of Coffee, and Capt. Leftnick of Maury and Lewis Counties. Capt. Cheatham . 5 ° : SEAS es — * " : PF a a — SET ee : SS . { = = et SIG Ss Soe ees a z = - - i << eS - ; : . SAME maps. PTT - = = adie same _— i se ———————— ; — =o oe Se — ees Rae ae Sachs ors aa ii = = a Sis ‘a naadee-nan aa nine ‘: - es : os —— a a r. fh : = can ner want = Sahaesen eee al eras coomi epee. oS. =o 5 ee SS Se was elected colonel of the Third and it was mustered into the service on NO ge sat eereman trac agen “~« ee hace October 8, 1847. Their place of rendezvous was about two and a half miles from Nashville on the Nolensville pike. The Fourth Regiment was composed of the companies of Capt. H. Dill, of McMinn; Capt. C. J. Flagg, of Blount; Capt. R. Oliver, of Anderson; Capt. J. B. Collins, of Bradley; Capt. E. Thomason, of Grainger; Capt. J. C. Vaughn, of Mon- roe; Capt. J. J. Reese, of Jefferson; Capt. G. W. Bounds, of Hawkins: Capt. G. W. Kenzie, of Meigs; Capt. McClellan, of Sullivan; Capt. Waterhouse, of Rhea, and Capts. Parson and Council, of Knox. Capt. Waterhouse, of Rhea, was elected colonel. The remaining forces of the State rendezvoused at Camp Carroll or Carrollton under Col. Trousdale. These forces were all taken to New Orleans by boat, thence by vessel to Vera Cruz. Here they were formed into a brigade, but did not arrive at the City of Mexico until the work of capture was done. However, Gen. Pillow paid a visit to Tennessee in the summer of 1847, and returned in July and joined Scott's army at Pueblo. He was in the advance upon the City of Mexico and engaged in the battles of Churubusco, Chapulte- pec, Molino del Ray and the seige of the city. He was one of the com- missioners to negotiate the surrender. Some very distinguished men were developed by this war; among them may be mentioned Goys. Trous- dale and Campbell, and Gens. B. F. Cheatham and Pillow. On settle- ment of the Mexican question the soldiers of Tennessee returned to their homes to enjoy the full measure of praise their valor upon the field had won. ag ' | sf I panes resatrmentnicanentiie Re ETERS on = - — = : : = es es a RL See = = = — - = a ee > — — =——— : = a =< satan . casera es . rp a Stes ee “i E ses = — : 5 : = - —e acinar es = =e =< a arg i eee oa i. # = ne om _— ¥ ~ : pad rm = = = a ee " a ete en, i ip oat Rc ties = —e ; ai = oe = a : eee = 7 Sa = ss eo era a ee = = SES : = === = = - = = a > : ov ae ie - ~ aie - penal - = s ~~ _ = — < : = = a = = :Li RATTIE OF = wrr i bee 4 1 ine VON ET sO} ) FORT DONELSON, Aa = o ™ Feb. 13-16, 1862 A % i - aT 7 a =~ ‘Ca, ~ sy > eS = ) i lL Mile a a <= V3 = 2S at — = ed fy , pt Peansports f j —oB re aN —<- } “GENS GRENTS Sn, } pe NZ, ol MHEAG® Q' RSS A Nii a nn Dy : ; \. Br e, D z j 5 . He 42 b KA ST Hew 1 fd» MOGs ~ \ aC C oo & SY - Aft <<: > 4 » if Y= = - O; AR ne SS mew YZ <— S by 7, SIE 7 s ~~ S © x 5 re S / % Ne Os Z Sn . a ~ EWA Sct 2 71M > We ¢ Z Ae Ata) (Ky > ci aoe] 4 = 86 iG 3 * ~O.\\ Sa 4 y Ge, = ~ “~D 2 Ni \e } ant : jf =| E < x ~ 1 — n ¥ Be aan r . ie S i] 5 DOVER} S-e-. 6; i = ry ¥ Woes \ H Si & Je, b-"* ZBL .G \ th Divy< UE ZO WIRY iy} n& S10 ? ; by « ay \ it ‘ png PMR, Z NS tt QO Nii i / li / Hy / hy / \ tH | | HH | a i / wie? HH Scene ee a IN eae eee oeeae eos ete : “ Ri aa oe aR ie nat ss So ese ae : = — Sear tee TE See Re Seat aaa ] ey ee een ep oa won —- ae — em a ue RET neu emer ed } Sa eae Fi lege a me x Qn 2 ws 7 : ne = z a — emer aaa Se ee an a eet oe So ahd ima Pai a i io aid : i aes 5 = : ' ome ily I I : as Sa oer i f ‘ be al a a ls i} ool ae ms oh ——— pe 3 Si hig: SHE “ar Soap . * = S = - % rare re ~ ; yet } rg aan ibe: Y i: i SS coment nS Dat i i | = Pe eae Ma Aaah f= Soetont ial : ir _ - ~~. —— = es - ——— 7 . i at nce AINE Adal = Se 8 - if Gata on. = ” Ear on - SS == eerie : Qo ve tn = —— - - a = ee — anil aa eam portant Ne AB —— ~ ; en a = gin OY a ae . = 7 ng See Se s = — ; ee es 2 < — < = ae -* fe phe ceyrtes mae wal SOS Se mee oe ama _ - RR ARE CT A ~ Se eT as aS ar OF ESI =HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ATT CHAPTER XV. FEDERAL MILITARY HISTORY—CAUSE OF THE LOYALTY OF EAST TENNESSEE—A R- RAIGNMENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND OF THE EXECUTIVE BY THE UNION CONVENTIONS—THE CONCENTRATION OF THE CONFEDERATE FORCES AT KNOXVILLE—ORGANIZATION OF THE UNIONISTS—THE HELPLESS SITUATION OF LOYAL CITIZENS—ACTIVE MILITARY OPERATIONS—SELECTED ILLUSTRATIVE CORRESPONDENCE—THE EXECUTION OF THE BRIDGE BURNERS—ARREST OF THE UNION LEADERS—AN OUTLINE OF THE PRINCIPAL MILITARY MOVE- MENTS—BURNSIDES’ OCCUPATION—SIEGE OF KNOXVILLE—THE CONCLUDING SKIRMISHES—SKETCHES OF THE REGIMENTS. O fact connected with the late civil war, abounding in striking events and gigantic achievements, is more remarkable than the number of troops furnished by Tennessee to the Federal Army. It is scarcely credible that a State with a voting population otf only about 140,000, raising nearly 100,000 troops for the Confederate Army, should also have furnished 30,000 men to fight for the Union. It becomes still more remarkable to consider that a very large proportion of this 30,000 F 1b be S = : wd heath a. , ou + be ttt i} ad teal ; itath t S ' rf ' $) ; heen! Par ee fits] Wh 1} ; i} ; } if (tea ' } ; ' ii ; Ni ; ie i} i + mie 1 : i | } Hi retias } iD } | ie | it ' 5 if t } : i i { { iva ‘ , a} 1 1 iis | ate : ' ey Ree yi 4 re ite iy j : i : : iF ' bile | I taht } a beet j i } ' ; \ ni | : i hae ie a reed HES] t ! ive ty ; 1 aes : } 1 ' yt int } ' \ ek bikes nt | } | } 1 1 : | ! } | j 1 ita ina 4 } ite ' } } ' He | ut ; { : ; i } i i Hoa} | il \\i) 'j 4 hy i Aue : 1) t | eh) ast { Ra : (rey | i } it \ 15 q ' ! Maple ih : ; \ } Wy yl} } i a | } j 5 ure 1 ey) th M i} i} : 1 ee} } { 1 { mi A i i et 5 74 i} | 1D } ee iit } , i } ' i 1 | fe HES i} ht | i } | | U came from a division of the State, having a male population between the ages of twenty and fifty, of only 45,000; and that unlike the volunteer from the Northern States, the Union soldier from Tennessee was not tempted to enlist by a munificent State bounty, nor impelled by the force of public opinion, but on the contrary, to do so, he was forced to escape from an enemy’s watchful guard at night and, leaving his home and all he held dear to the mercy of a hostile foe, make his way across the bleak and cheerless mountains, to the Union camps in Kentucky. For an explanation of this remarkable adherence to the Union on the part of the people of Hast Tennessee, it is necessary to look to the origin of the war. As many as have been its alleged causes, all may be traced to the one prime cause, slavery ; all others were the result of or incident to slavery, as has been shown by Dr. Draper, in his history of the war. The difference in climate, soil and physical features between the North and the South, through its effect wpon the growth of slavery, was a remote agency in producing strife between the two sections. On the other hand, the dissimilarity in character, occupation and political sentiments of the people was largely the result of their different systems of labor. It is true, the difference in character of the original colonists was a more or less important factor, but its effect was not great. East Tennessee was settled by the same class of people as that part of the State west of the Cumberland Mountains, and at one time the people 30a TT aa aes — nic ineatieencainenri emanate xe ria nee EO om SS PR ae ears satire — ees Soa a ee POT ages a ee Pea 478 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. of the two sections were homogeneous; but owing to the peculiar topogra- phy of the former, however, slave labor was not very profitable, and com- paratively few slaves were owned—the proportion of the free men be- ing about as one totwenty. The same divergence of interest grew up be- tween Kast Tennessee and the middle and western divisions of the State, as between the North and South as a whole. Consequently upon all ques- tions of political and domestic economy, Hast ‘Tennessee was usually identified with the Northern States. Since 1836, as a whole, it had been strongly Whig, and in some sections for many years, a strong aboli- tion sentiment had existed; when therefore, it was proposed to sacrifice the Union to perpetuate slavery, the majority of the people of Hast Tennessee joined with the freemen of the North, to prevent its consum- mation. They foresaw that should a Confederacy of the slave States be- come established, the person who owned no slaves, as a factor in politics and in society, would be acipher. It is undoubtedly true that the great body of the people did not see this result, but their leaders did, and per- haps in no State were the masses more submissive to leadership than in Tennessee. In addition to this the State, as a whole, had always been intensely patriotic. The readiness with which she had come to the defense of the country, when threatened by an alien or a savage foe, had won for her the name of ‘The Volunteer State.” It was the greatest of Tennesseeans who said: ‘The Union! It must and shall be preserved.’ Even the ma- jority of those who joined in the support of the Confederacy, did so, only when they felt it to be their highest duty, and it was with no feigned grief that they left the old “stars and stripes,” to rally around a new and strange flag. As has been stated, the preponderance of Union sentiment in Tennessee was in the eastern division of the State, yet at the election in 1860 the majority for the “Union” electors was quite large throughout the State. Even after the secession of South Carolina and other more Southern States, the entire State remained firmly for the Union, as was shown by a vote of 24,749 for, to 91,803 against calling a convention. But after the attack upon Fort Sumter, and the call for troops by Presi- dent Lincoln, which worked such a change in the sentiment of the people of this State, the stronghold of the Unionists was in East Tennessee. At the election held in June, to vote on the question of separation or no separation, while the total number of votes in the State against that meas- ure was 47,274, 32,962 of them were cast in East Tennessee.* This result was due in a great measure to the position taken by the political leaders Andrew Johnson, T. A. R. Nelson, William G. *See elsewhere for the full returns of these elections.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 479 Brownlow, Horace Maynard, Connolly F. Trigg, William B. Carter and others, who took a determined stand against secession and did all in their power to prevent Tennessee from going outof the Union. To determine the relative amount of influence exerted by each individual would be an impossibility. Myr. Johnson has by many been accorded the credit for the loyalty of Hast Tennessee, and it was in part due to his influence. He was very popular with the Democracy of the State, and especially of his congressional district, and his powerful pleas for the Union carried many of his party with him. But with the Whig element he could have had but little influence, since he had advocated the election of Breckin- ridge at the preceding presidential election, and had otherwise rendered himself obnoxious to them. In fact, as has been stated, the Whigs of East Tennessee were naturally attached to the Union, and diametrically opposed to the principles of the extreme Democracy, which had inaug- urated the Rebellion. It, therefore, required only the eloquence and zeal of the old leaders Nelson, Maynard, Brownlow and others to fire them o,”? which not even the oO with an enthusiasm for the Union and the “old fla hardships of four years of war served to abate. On the 30th of May preceding that election, about 500 delegates, representing nearly every county in Kast Tennessee, assembled at Knoxville in pursuance of the following call: The undersigned, a portion of the people of East Tennessee, disapproving the hasty and inconsiderate action of our General Assembly, and sincerely desirous to do, in the midst of the trouble which surrounds us, what will be best for our country, and for all classes of our citizens, respectfully appoint a convention to,be held in Knoxville on Thursday, the 80th of May inst.; and we urge every county in East Tennessee to send dele- gates to this convention, that the conservative element of our whole section may be repre- sented, and that wise and judicious counsels may prevail—looking to peace and harmony among ourselves. FEF. S. HEISKELL, JOHN WILLIAMS, W. H. RoGeErs, JOHN J. CRAIG, S. R. RoGERS, JOHN BAXTER, Dr. W. ROGERS, O. P. TEMPLE, W.G. BrowNLow, JOAN TUNNELL, C. F. Triae, [and others. | CG. HH BAER; DAVID BURNETT, The convention met at Temperance Hall, and was called to order by Connolly F. Trigg, upon whose motion John Baxter was chosen tempo- rary president, and John M. Fleming, temporary secretary. Prayer was offered by Rev. Thomas W. Humes, after which Thomas A. R. Nelson was chosen president, and John M. Fleming, secretary. After addresses by the president and Gen. Thomas D. Arnold, and the appointment of a general committee representing the various counties, the convention adjourned to meet the next morning. On the next day the committee, through their chairman, Col. Trigg, submitted their report which, atter considerable debate, was amended and finally adopted. The following ; i . = a a aE LT oe a RE 2 iain sere ee = = ee , Se a ae SeaSe ee — * anim iises era ees ri if = “ IZ : Z t 4 ; 5 : J j ;. a | 5 { ai i . cs [ee : : | : i ; a , Ae q % aut) j ite f i wee eae h 4 « 5 f x , ' 4 i hehe i x y | at { Sfeals f : :| ia is bts) i ‘ i re f L ie he , o ; { ‘ i f 4 . f - i ‘ é : me k ‘ ie aaa i e i ; i i i i i : ‘ “08 Be 27 4 : ; { : 4 | } t aanatt 5] i | ‘9 rh 2 \ ) ae feels bee : iia ; aa ial! hee | S } it, { pe \ ; ny ia bait ; j ‘ VA t 1 > ' 44 j + ea} ? ea ; a, ‘ 1 ‘| Velie & ‘y Pia | eee oi a 3 lie By; j Wiias f 5 feyesi gs I \ e le i 1 et ioe 9.4 || fae ‘ igs 4 2 4 + 7 its ve ; fas tidy ; ‘ # foil) 4 ct EE f 1 » wh 1 ! he ai i i 1% mG a P 2 ; ; it Ve i : if aye il : ret o i at \ 4 ; | ine fain | | ey ery ' ie 4 } ao at, if (i Bae | byes aa) 3 i te ih | ig 7 4 Pie i! i rte yeas) ' ee i\$ fet ‘ Tikva’ guy j i Hog ; ¢ 4 : f a te } ty ‘ ar ke Remit phe bbe ie pk ‘ r + fl 1 b> } 7 te hy 1 t } ha sb oh | cea! 7 eae et ‘ 08) | Mu ayy . ian at 5 Vee | : 4 { } i BF 4 a ‘ me fed a A% fa ij i aa cet SP apa Rana tnmte «alah igen oe! lg 0 elena ; nt SE = SRN Ap ra 7 3 Sa eae 2 Ts a aaa - SE me A RT, NT 480 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. are some of the resolutions, which were preceded by a preamble of con- siderable length: We, therefore, the delegates here assembled, representing and reflecting, as we verily believe, the opinions and wishes of a large majority of the people of East Tennessee, do resolve and declare: First. That the evil which now afflicts our beloved country in our opinion is the legitimate result of the ruinous and heretical doctrine of secession; that the people of East Tennessee have ever been, and we believe still are opposed to it by a very large majority. Second. That while the country is upon the very threshold of a most ruinous and desolating civil war, it may with truth be said, and we protest before God, that the people see) have done nothing to produce it. % % % x * % (so far as we can % * ; Sixth. That the Legislature of the State, without having first obtained the consent of the people, had no authority to enter into a ‘‘ military league”’ with the ‘‘ Confederate States” against the General Government, and by so doing to put the State of Tennessee in hostile array against the government of which it then was and still is a member. Such legislation in advance of the expressed will of the people to change their governmental relations was an act of usurpation, and should be visited with the severest condemnation of the people. Seventh. That the forming of such ‘‘military league,” and thus practically assum- ing the attitude of an enemy towards the General Government (this, too, in the absence of any hostile demonstration against the State) has afforded the pretext for raising, arm- ing and equipping a large military force, the expense of which must be enormous, and will have to be paid by the people. And to do this, the taxes, already onerous enough, will necessarily have to be very greatly increased, and probably to an extent beyond the ability to pay. Kighth. That the General Assembly by passing a law authorizing the volunteers to vote wherever they may be on the day of election, whether in or out of the State, and in offer- ing to the ‘‘ Confederate States” the capitol of Tennessee, together with other acts, have exercised powers and stretched their authority to an extent not within their constitutional limits, and not justified by the usages of the country. Ninth. That government being instituted for the common benefit, the doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind. Tenth. That the position which the people of our sister State of Kentucky have assumed in this momentous crisis, commands our highest admiration. Their interests are our interests. Their policy isthe true policy, as we believe, of Tennessee and all the bor- der States. And in the spirit of freemen, with an anxious desire to avoid the waste of the blood and the treasure of our State, we appeal to the people of Tennessee, while it is yet in their power, to come up in the majesty of their strength and restore Tennessee to her true position. Eleventh. We shall await with the utmost anxiety the decision of the people of Ten- nessee on the 8th day of next month*, and sincerely trust that wiser counsels will pervade the great fountain of freedom (the people) than seem to have actuated their constituted agent. Twelfth. For the promotion of the peace and harmony of the people of East Ten- nessee, it is deemed expedient that this convention should again assemble, therefore: Resolved, That when this convention adjourns, it adjourns to meet again at such time and place as the president or vice-president in his absence may determine and publish. Aiter the adoption of the above resolution an eloquent and effective address was delivered by Andrew Johnson. This convention was com- *Heference made to the election to be held June 8, 1861.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 481 posed of representative men of Hast ‘Tennessee, men of influence and ability. They foresaw the result of the coming election, but not wishing Mia to anticipate it by any act, made provision for a future meeting. The | ee >" number of delegates 1n attendance is evidence of the intense interest in the question before the people; 5,000 copies of the proceedings of the convention were printed and distributed over the State, but it was of lit- tle avail in stemming the tide of secession which swept over Middle and West Tennessee. The leaders in those divisions, with few exceptions é 3 notably among whom was Emerson Etheridge, had been carried away js x s . - by it. So strong was the influence that such men as Niell S. Brown, Judge R. L. Caruthers, Felix K. Zollicoffer and many others, who at the previous election had voted against a convention, were now among the strongest advocates of disunion. The election on the 8th of June re- sulted as shown elsewhere, and three days later Judge Nelson issued a call for the East Tennessee Convention to meet on the 17th of that month at Greeneville. Delegates from all of the counties except Rhea assembled at the appointed time, and continued in session four days. Their labors resulted in the preparation of the declaration of grievances, of which the following is an extract, and the adoption of the resolutions succeeding: We, the people of East Tennessee, again assembled in a convention of our delegates, make the following declaration in addition to that heretofore promulgated by us at Knox- ville on the 30th and 31st of May last. So far as we can learn, the election held in this State on the 8th day of the present month was free, with but few exceptions, in no other part of the State than East Tennessee. In the larger part of Middle and West Tennessee no speeches or discussion in favor of the Union were permitted. Union papers were not allowed to circulate. Measures were taken in some parts of West Tennessee in defiance of the constitution and laws which allow folded tickets, to have the ballots numbered in such a manner as to mark and expose the Union voter. A disunion paper, The Nashville Gazette, in urging the people to vote an open ticket, declared that ‘‘a thief takes a pocket-book or effects an entrance into forbidden places by stealthy means; a Tory, in voting, usually adopts pretty much the same mode of pro- cedure.’ Disunionists in many places had charge of the polls, and Union men when vot- ing were denounced as Lincolnites and abolitionists. The unanimity of the votes in many large counties where but a few weeks ago the Union sentiment was so strong, proves be- yond a doubt that Union men were overawed by the tyranny of the military law, and the still greater tyranny of a corrupt and subsidized press. Volunteers were allowed to vote ‘n and out of the State in flagrant violation of the constitution. From the moment the election was over, and before any detailed statement of the vote in the different counties had been published, and before it was possible to ascertain the result, it was exultingly proclaimed that separation had been carried by from fifty to seventy-five thousand votes. This was to prepare the public mind to enable the secessionists to hold possession of the State, though they should be in the minority. The final result is to be announced by a disunion governor, whose existence depends upon the success of secession, and no provis- ion is made by law for an examination of the votes by disinterested persons, or even for contesting the election. For these and other causes we do not regard the result of the election expressive of the will of the majority of the people of Tennessee. No effort has been spared to deter the Union men of East Tennessee from the expres- sion of their free thoughts. The penalties of treason have been threatened against them, ee ~ acta na si————— 2 eae ee ~ Tar. . . ! =e = —— RE LET em - - - > € . £ hs a - és = ms a a nn ws >. > > ee ana ad ee x ies ane = ee Tee > “ial Ta orn Ty ae, ao - sa Fa Ta POT Eo ES AT Ee RM al acta er aan Soe é 4 Sa = ~ - piace = a ¥ Ta sia: oes - : rina “SAT ae arenas <— a ae - — . a 5 ae parle aera = a a = ot ieee - IR CE arms eam : ea 7 a — - = “ = - _——" = aaa SO Le arene eee name aS . a ‘ 2 = : ~ pga ea ; as Saba EEE OR aaa = i a tet a ees 8 SS sone ere i ag negeecse cere HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. and murder and assassination have been openly encouraged by leading secession journals. As secession has thus been overbearing and intolerant while in the minority in East Ten- nessee, nothing better can be expected of the pretended majority than wild, unconstitu- tional and oppressive legislation, an utter contempt and disregard of law, a determination to force every Union man in the State to swear to the support of a constitution he abhors, to yield his money and property to aid a cause he detests, and to become the object of scorn and derision as well as the victim of intolerable and relentless oppression. In view of these considerations, and of the fact that the people of East Tennessee have declared their fidelity to the Union by a majority of about 20,000 votes, therefore we do resolve and declare First. That we do earnestly desire the restoration of peace to our whole country, and most especially that our own section of the State of Tennessee should not be involved in eivil war. Second. That the action of our State Legislature in passing the so-called ‘‘Declaration of Independence,” and in forming the ‘‘ Military League’ with the Confederate States, and in adopting other acts looking to a separation of the State of Tennessee from the Government of the United States, is unconstitutional and illegal, and, therefore, not bind- ing upon us as loyal citizens. Third. That in order to avert a conflict with our brethren in other parts of the State, and desiring that every constitutional means shall be resorted to for the preservation of peace, we do, therefore, constitute and appoint O. P. Temple, of Knox; John Netherland, of Hawkins, and James P. McDowell, of Greene, commissioners, whose duty it shall be to prepare a memorial and cause the same to be presented to the General Assembly of Ten- nessee, now in session, asking its consent that the counties composing East Tennessee and such counties in Middle Tennessee as desire to coperate with them, may form and erect a separate State. Fourth. Desiring in good faith that the General Assembly will grant this our reason- able request, and still claiming the right to determine our own destiny, we do further re- solve that an election be held in all the counties of East Tennessee, and such other coun- ties in Middle Tennessee adjacent thereto as may desire to co-operate with us, for the ehoice of delegates to represent them in a general convention to be held in the town of Kingston, at such time as the president of this convention, or in case of his absence or in- ability, any one of the vice-presidents, or in like case with them the secretary of this con- vention may designate, and the officer so designating the day for the assembling of said eonvention shall also fix the time for holding the election herein provided for, and give reasonable notice thereof. Fifth. In order to carry out the foregoing resolution the sheriffs of the different eounties are hereby requested to open and hold said election or cause the same to be done, the coroner of such county is requested to do so, and should such coroner fail or refuse, then any constable of such county is hereby authorized to open and hold said election or cause the same to be done, and if in any county none of the above named officers will hold said election, then any justice of the peace or freeholder in such county is author- ized to hold the same or cause it to be done. The officer or other person holding said election shall certify the result to the president of this convention or to such officer as may have directed the same to be holden, at as early a day thereafter as practicable, and the officer to whom said returns may be made shall open and compare the polls, and issue certificates to the delegates elected. Sixth. That in said convention, the several counties shall be represented as follows: The county of Knox shall elect three delegates; the counties of Washington, Greene and Jefferson two delegates each, and the remaining counties shall each elect one delegate. Twenty thousand copies of the proceedings of this convention, to- gether with the proceedings of the session at Knoxville, were ordered to be published in pamphlet form for general distribution. The excite-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 483 ment in East Tennessee soon became intense. The proceedings of this convention, together with speeches denunciatory of the new government, fanned the already glowing fires of insurrection among the Unionists. Brownlow’s Knoxville Whig, a paper which had a very large circulation in this part of the State, did much to arouse the people. very number contained articles filled with the bitterest invective against the “bogus Confederacy.” Landon C. Haynes, a Confederate leader, in writing to L. P. Walker, Confederate Secretary of War, concerning the condition of affairs in Hast Tennessee, on July 6, 1861, said: “Thomas A. R. Nelson, William G. Brownlow, Connolly F. Trigg and William B. Carter are the leaders. Moral power cannot longer be relied on to crush the rebellion. No man possesses that power. Bell had more than any other man, but he is as helpless as a child.” Three days later Secretary Walker requested Gov. Harris to send immediately two regiments to Hast Tennessee, which was accordingly done, and on July 26, “Gen. Zolli- coffer was ordered to assume command of that district, to preserve peace, On August 26 he issued Gen- 99 protect the railroad and repel invasion. eral Order No. 11, in which he states: “The following are the names of the Lincoln leaders in Johnson County: Lewis Venable, of Laurel Creek; Northington, hotel-keeper at Taylorsville ; BR. BR. Butler, of Taylorsville, representative of the county; John G. Johnson and J. W. Merrick, cap- tains of Lincoln companies. Joseph P. Edoms, of Elizabethton, Carter County, and A. Evans, of Washington County, are also among the ring- leaders of them.” On July 10, 1861, Judge Nelson issued a proclama- tion for an election to be held on the dist of August, to choose delegates as provided in the resolutions of the Greeneville Convention. Owing to succeeding events, however, this election did not take place. At the election held the first week in August, Horace Maynard, Thomas iy RE Nelson and G. W. Bridges were elected representatives to the United States Congress by the Unionists, who refused to vote for representatives to the Confederate Congress. A day or two later Judge Nelson started for Washington, by the way of Cumberland Gap, but was arrested in Lee County, Va., and taken to Richmond. He was soon alter paroled and returned to his home. At about the same time Bridges was arrested in Morgan County, and was also released upon taking the oath of allegiance to the Confederacy. During the summer and early fall Union men were quietly organiz- ing and drilling. In most places this was done secretly, but in some localities the Union sentiment was so unanimous that there was no need of concealment. Singly and in squads they began crossing the moun- tains into Kentucky, where they were organized into companies and regi-7 aeggper acy greener sar ne aa naeget = 5 AN Nat s 2 ragga reaper ass Bi ee neal pu ea ape ea eer a ed — arpa rer err Gaston ee ee ieee — ager ay ; nie 5 cas ae : ; Yo : a a a - ; = Tk EG ea me - ; re as : =o ee * este = | - : he werner: Ser ie mene ee - r pene spo Mert ade es ae : = cae S35 = nese } Lame oa Seal ee ——— — mi x SSS Sa ee . Roles ee ee F z : cages eka " = ; — — era : az = oe pont Pak apes iano 484 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ments. Those who remained behind were constantly urging and expect- ing an advance upon Hast Tennessee by the Federal troops, and they held themselves in readiness for a general uprising when that should take place. John F. Fisk, in writing to Kt. Buckner, on September 22, 1861, says: “The mountaineers will whip Zollicoffer as s00n as they get ammunition. By all means send them J/ead, lead, lead!” William B. Carter wrote to Gen. Thomas on October 27 and earnestly called for an advance upon East Tennessee. In speaking of Zollicoffer’s forces he said: ‘‘Zollicoffer has 6,000 men all told; 1,000 of them are sick, 600 or 800 are not arrived; 1,600 of the 6,000 are at Cumberland Gap, the balance beyond the Gap.” This force proved to be too small to sup- press the constantly growing power of the Unionists and the leading Confederates in East Tennessee began to call for re-enforcements. Gen. A. S. Johnston, on November 4, 1861, sent a despatch to Secretary Ben- jamin, in which he said: ‘‘ Herewith I transmit for your information a letter from Goy. Harris, inclosing one from Mr. C. Wallace, imparting information in regard to the political sentiments of the people of East Tennessee, which he represents as extremely hostile to the Confederate Government, and that there is among them a large and well-armed force ready to act at an opportune moment. I have already ordered Stanton’s and Murray’s regiments and some cavalry companies from their stations in Fentress, Overton and Jackson Counties to Jamestown to join some cavalry companies at that place, thence to report and await the orders of Gen. Zollicoffer, who has been notified.” The letter referred to above was written at Knoxville, October 29, and is as follows: Dear Governor: I don’t like to meddle in things that are in keeping of men so much more vigilant and wise than I, but I am constrained by the circumstances about me to be- lieve that Zollicoffer and the railroads of East Tennessee are in a dangerous condition at present. [am well aware that the views of the ‘‘original panel’ in Hast Tennessee are not much heeded abroad, but I am well satisfied that there is to-day a larger Lincoln force, well armed in East Tennessee, than Zollicoffer has of Southern men under his command. x There is no giving way in the hostile feeling in East Tennessee. This you may rely on, and time will convince you. Truly your friend, C. WALLACE. On November 1 Col. W. B. Wood, commanding the post at Knox- ville, wrote to Secretary Benjamin: ‘“ There can be no doubt of the fact that large parties, numbering from twenty to a hundred, are every day passing through the narrow and unfrequented gaps of the mountains into Kentucky. I do not believe that the Unionists are in the least recon- ciled to the Government, but, on the contrary, are as hostile to it as the people of Ohio, and will be ready to take up arms as soon as they be- lieve the Lincoln forces are near enough to sustain them.” These Opinions proved to be well founded, and on the night of the 8th ofHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 48d November the excitement culminated in the burning of three or four railroad bridges on the road between Bristol and Chattanooga. This created great alarm, and more vigorous measures were adopted to-subdue the Unionists, and crush out the insurrection against the Confederate Government. Many arrests were made, not only upon charges of com- plicity in the bridge burning, but for encouraging the Unionist move- ment. Col. D. Leadbetter was immediately ordered to Hast Tennessee with an engineer corps to repair and protect the railroads. Letters and despatches from all points in East Tennessee were poured in upon the Confederate authorities, all telling of the imminent danger from a gen- eral uprising of the Unionists. Maj. T. J. Cannon, stationed at Loudon, wrote: ‘The Union feeling of this country is very bitter, and all they want, in my opinion, to induce a general uprising, is encouragement from the Federal authorities by the introduction or advance of Lincoln armies. They have a great many arms, and are actually manufacturing Union flags to receive the refugee Tennesseeans when they return. They are getting bold enough to avow their purpose.” Col. Wood wrote from Knoxville to Adjt.-Gen. Cooper:, “Five hundred Union men are now threatening Strawberry Plains, fifteen hundred are assembling in Ham- ilton County, and there is a general uprising in all the counties. The whole country is now in a state of rebellion. I learn from two gentle- men just arrived that another camp is being formed about ten miles from here, in Sevier County, and already three hundred are in camp. They are being re-enforced from Blount, Roane, Johnson, Greene, Carter and other counties.” The writer of the letter of which the following is an extract, advised the removal of the Union sympathizers from Hast Tennessee: JonEsBoro, TENN., November 12, 1861. His EXcELLENCY JEFFERSON DAVIS: Sir: Civil war has broken out at length in East Tennessee. In the late election scarcely a so-called Union man voted. Neither Mr. Nelson nor any of the released men who had been sworn to be faithful to the Southern Confederacy voted upon the occasion, and there appeared a simultaneous assault upon our line of railroads from Virginia to the Georgialine. In this county the secession strength is about equal to the Union force, but our force is much weakened by five volunteer companies now in the service. In Carter and Johnson Counties, northeast of this, the Union strength is not only as formidable but it is as violent as that of any of the northwestern counties of Virginia. Had they the power not a sessionist would live in this region. The hostile element in those counties, and also in Greene, is so strong that I give it as my firm conviction that it will neither abate nor be conciliated. They look for the re-establishment of the Federal authority with as much confidence as the Jews look for the coming of Messiah, and I feel quite sure when I assert ‘+t that no event or circumstance can change or modify their hope. cee aWienwal crush out the rebellion here in aweek or ten days, but to prevent its recurrence should be a matter of anxious consideration. * * There are now camped in and about Elizabeth- Qe Se ne eeoe =e Stas I Ln Se ayncncatony; = SAE LES a es + SS a iS a wi api Sa a er mie = nn : ae 5 5 = ns as Fea paea naa pe le Be - — : ; . . - : es = = - s pence hes abana late. onan ~~ — - 2 = - - eo OE ™ PT OS —— = . ee rie ngs aes ear = E - e c : = ar Nig apienigasttgealt FEL ‘ on : < . z - x en PRS 7 mies = : ; ae : E tein = ee : A area pagealenn ae ‘ re 2 ; aaa _ " : oe le se ‘ a ia pe ote mit es 2 mee : = — == = = > - — = . = d —, ag Sera = eee - rh ane 7 : Sad ERNE cacao a Se TE ce te 492 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. no attack until Sunday, November 29, eleven days after the beginning of the siege. He had evidently intended to starve Burnside into a sur- render, but learning that Sherman was coming from Chattanooga, decid- ed to make an assault. His delay had given the besieged time to strengthen their defenses, and proved fatal to his hopes of success. At daylight on the 29th the famous “Barksdale Brigade,” composed of Mississippi troops, made an attack upon Fort. Sanders, then under command of Gen. Ferrero, but was repulsed with a loss of about 1,100 killed and 300 taken prisoners, while the Union loss was only 8 killed, 5 wounded and 30 prisoners. Fort Sanders, on the southwest part of town, was the strongest point in the fortifications. A deep ditch had been dug all around it, and in front of this trees had been cut down, and telegraph wires stretched from stump to stump about eight inches from the ground, in order to trip the men and break the lines.* These served their intended purpose, but the charge was made by veterans, and they pushed on, filled the ditch, climbed up the parapet and planted three Confederate flags on the top. The fort would then, undoubtedly, have been taken had it not been for the action of Lieut. Benjamin, commander of the battery. The guns could not reach those in the ditch, and he, taking the shells in his hand, cut the fuse, and lighting them with his cigar threw them over the parapet, when they exploded, doing terrible execution. + The assault was not renewed, and on the following Friday, December 4, the last of Longstreet’s troops withdrew from in front of the city. The next day Sherman sent a despatch to Burnside from Maryville, say- ing that he was at that point with 25,000 men, and would leave them there unless needed at Knoxville. In a short time he returned with his forces to Chattanooga, leaving the Fourth Army Corps under Gen. Gran- ger to re-enforce the garrison at Knoxville. Gen. Longstreet retreated slowly up the north bank of the Holston River, followed by the Ninth and Twenty-third Corps, under Gen. Parke, and about 4,000 cavalry. As soon as the former had learned that Sher- man had returned to Chattanooga with the main part of his command, he turned upon his pursuers, then at Bean’s Station, and administered to them a decided defeat. Owing to the inclemency of the weather, however, and the bad condition of both armies, active operations were soon after suspended. Longstreet went into winter quarters at Morristown and Russellville, and Gen. Foster, who had succeeded Gen. Burnside in *This plan was suggested to the engineer by Mr. J. B. Hoxie, of Knoxville, who had been master mechanic on the East Tennessee & Virginia Railroad. Upon the occupation of Knoxville Burnside made him a mem- ber of his staff, and placed him in charge of transportation, in which position he rendered valuable assistance. 7 History of the Twenty-first Regiment Massachusetts Volunteers.We \ . { , SO bite PEO EY PR tect POP eR Ro ae HASANIE TU 1h)=; (OR ¢ IT | = | IN 2 . ~ f. [MISSIONARY RIDGE. =\; ) = t ay; 4 Z ye Ss , i) Qo: 1 I oe eo" vg Lo u a = li: N\ YZ >. CRANE(S//ATLE A oe =\\ Que" Ail z ; ad Z cy = = ( aN x 4 yn ‘* ¢ owe \ \/ 4 Ly i ; NS Sy 1 f : ( C fe WZ SN wy \ ZI\ I pat 1 ‘ AK 4, Aye GE Ary yy hp LW 1 —= Ab + GB 4 ‘ < fe SS 4, J WEA Se ae el SRT Ginx WYP SSS ESS | \ Sg = bE > SW a | ( Cameron BY = SS ML | Brown's ZY | Z WE | Wes Aten) ca i Ni 5 WZ. A\\ pS Hy = i) Orel ci PR j SSS ©) S NIG Wa =|\ \))\\\" 5 |i =) een s ; é ~ x] ss LG \ ¢ \ Q \ +] y 20 1 SAN 2 = SoS, SSS S ih R yl) Eik«el] DEah Nt + SSS SS Ih = S i ik | 4% Cont I Ks it ow > © @ SS aoa eee QS — IA\\\ NFA ANS Zor AAS 2\ Sue (NZS KS Mi D = }> a Vay A ‘- C ) Vi) \ Sie 2 \ Hen & Z% Wiis = BASIN . | AIM WS! ns » WAC — AWS AAK S Wek oF ~ SS \ Af) ~ \ = S LD ) | KS 5 |] eS WW, \ \ SS — — | Wi WGA! \ = 3 // SS = J \ Es| Qc = = = 1) NYw yi oi = 2 we Z = = SS) | \ f = 2 ) SX = QS \ \ \ - ~ > —2—_fy)- > Ay I \ eve oa: D = QL <— 2. “AMS SZ -~ N% © ISS? SSS oS La \\ le a * te Y = \ \ at — — ve S = 5 $ eed Z. _ DO A = - = S ce OO § An aH Sy sy % SR; WS = 4 SN < : NSF ms SAIN + > oe ‘ ( ~ WZ é tH s WZ \ \ oe < = \\\ > —— I ES ' 2 RS SS Qi Y = Ly ic ga S ae I = & —— 1 7 / = <= , Ss : e (3 25 = Wo \ ST SS ZZ >» \. | SS = \\ = & Ze \ = ; S | oes tf S WY \\ — zs \ HI rS [ <8 if . saeN Is 1 BP Se . WA Wi, KB S \ Mi) } / S ~ ' ¥ ) i ‘Nin, NG Si = e | { \ SS ~ A i, ie } WFY S 0 ctorp Hie | SANA £ ~~, ¢ ; : : / VW"? S&S . +H ee | ' - ) = SS ROSSVILLE Wi yy a Fi at a ANY rm ere \s | as By : es Set gana oe ee Rig ene ay Te er EESSap Sa ee ahaa ip Ee A ache ae an eegnneee as : — =: => a I - — = = ee idee ° = —— ST seaman as ‘ ~ ee STF : - = Sane: : aanaieiadea. Ni oe —— = os oa ~~ - 7 nee renin SORRY tate a ana < eae - nee ere a ee ese ch “ aan as ta = erate oat naive eee s seas i - . . : _ fue b 7 : Beare - - ; EOS Z mel ee a =; “3 te ian Hoe = Se ‘é ee te . 3 iecenereess palin iis me é a: ~ — oa oc GE oa lt A a CU a ~~ a ee . ns ae os > nae ta on oa ee ie - ~ a — re eee —— — —_ z ~ : = =HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 493 command of the Army of the Ohio, withdrew the greater part of his forces to Knoxville. When Burnside retreated to Knoxville a portion of his command was stationed in detachments at various points above that city and were con- sequently shut out during the siege. Among these detachments were several Tennessee regiments. The Tennessee troops that participated in the defense of Knoxville were the Eighth Infantry and the Eighth and Ninth Cavalry, and others. During the June previous to the siege Gen. Sanders, with about 2.000 men, including the First Tennessee Infantry, made a successful raid into East Tennessee from Kentucky. He reached Knoxville on the evening of June 20, 1863. The next day he planted a battery on the north side of the town and began an artillery duel with the Confederates on the opposite ridge, during which only one person was injured. Pleasant M. McClung was shot, it is said, by the last gun fired by San- ders’ men. Gen. Buckner, in command of the post, was absent with his life guard, leaving only Kain’s artillery and parts of two Florida regi- ments to defend it. Had Gen. Sanders made an immediate assault he could probably have captured the town. During the day, however, a Virginia regiment arrived and Sanders retreated to Strawberry Plains and Mossy Creek and thence back into Kentucky. February 9, 1864, Gen. J. M. Schofield superseded Gen. Foster in command of the Army of the Ohio. No movement of importance was made until April, when, Gen. Longstreet having gone to rejoin Lee in Virginia, preparations were made for the Georgia campaign. ‘The oOo Ninth Corps having been returned to the Army of the Potomac, (Gen. Schofield was assigned to the command of the Twenty-third Corps, and O. O. Howard succeeded Gen. Granger in command of the Fourth Corps. a a RR aanneinaneuianet About the last of April, 1864, after tearing up the railroad for a consid- erable distance above Bull’s Gap, the entire force, with the exception of small garrisons at Knoxville and Loudon, moved to join Sherman. The Tennessee Infantry, which participated in this campaign, formed a part of the Twenty-third Corps, and included the Third and Sixth Regiments, Cooper’s brigade; Fifth Regiment, Manson’s brigade, and the First and Kighth Regiments, ———— brigade. The history of the Georgia campaign and the part performed by the Twenty-third Corps 1s too well known to require mention here. October 31, 1864, Gen. Schofield, who was at Resaca with the Twenty-third Corps, was ordered by Gen. Thomas to Pulaski. He arrived at Nashville November 5, and was immediately sent to Johnsonville. Finding that the enemy had already retreated he left a force for the defense of that part and moved to join the Fourth 31Se as a oI ey ae err rae y = = ETOP = ee LENE “= ae nee = RR eS ee Rie = Coes ae --- os ie ss aE Pre ae ‘ » ma maar : BP ee ea hese ar 4 ae = ea neigngs a a tres eee iii I # ee cain - . ERE wit ae ona atest: ety ae, as at see epee oe = peer mann sear gies Pa, eee eer Srgeetcee ae ae ek nan ee - err ee cow it OEE 2 = were eens eet tee A eee T DELI = = s 7 at ie fe ~ : : —— —— oe ch = 7 ~ = — oe = a g az -* = - | png an nan en - 5 . eg ae - “ é nih ae Pd Seren cp ask ates pene a te bs ‘ = S25. ese i ace tiie 5s = = eer * sae = De cage aie meet i ee IES Sf oe et OE ET TANS re: a md Fa PE SAS ae : inion, ae erie Aa PR pa a ‘i 4.94 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ~ +f - = a 4 a . r oi Corps at Atlanta. Among the troops left at Johnsonville were the Third and Sixth Tennessee Infantry, Cooper’s brigade. Tennessee cavalry were also employed in that vicinity. When Hood reached Columbia Gen. Cooper was ordered to join Gen. Schofield at Franklin, for which place he immediately started. ‘Owing to delays in receiving his orders, however, he could not reach Franklin before its oe- Several regiments of eupation by the enemy, and turned his column direct for Nashville, and arrived at the Brentwood Hill, by the Charlotte pike, on the night of December 2, and again found the enemy between him and the army. He then marched to Clarksville, where he arrived in safety on the oth, and rejoined his command on the 8th of December. Gen. Cooper de- serves great credit for the skill and judgment displayed in conducting his retreat.’’* The fight which took place before Nashville was participated in by All the infantry regiments then in the field, with the exception of the Fourth, more ‘l’ennessee troops than any other one battle of the war. and all the cavalry, except three regiments under Gen. Gillem, were present. All conducted themselves gallantly, and several received es- pecial mention from the commanding officer in his report of the battle. August 4, 1864, what was known as the “Brigade of Governor’s Guards” was organized in accordance with the following order: STATE OF TENNESSEE, EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT, NASHVILLE, TENN., August 1, 1864. ORDERED 1. That Gen. A. C. Gillem, adjutant-general of Tennessee, be assigned to the command of the troops known as the ‘“‘Governor’s Guards.” 2. That First Lieut. Ed S. Richards is announced as assistant adjutant-general of the State of Tennessee, and must be obeyed and respected accordingly. Lieut. Richards will establish his office in this city. 8. Itis further ordered that Gen. Alvan C. Gillem proceed with the Ninth and Thir- teenth Regiments of Tennessee Cavalry, and Batteries E and G, First Tennessee Light Artillery, to East Tennessee, and, under such orders as he shall from time to time receive from this office, kill or drive out all bands of lawless persons or bands which now infest that portion of the State. It is not to be understood that this order shall prevent Gen. Gillem, whenever he shall deem it feasible or expedient, from pursuing said bands of out- laws beyond the limits of the State. Gen. Gillem is further authorized, under such in- struction as he shall receive from this office, to take such measures as are deemed expedi- ent to re-establish order and enforce civil law, to which end Gen. Gillem will lend every assistance in his power to the regularly constituted civil authorities. All the organized regiments of Tennessee troops being raised in East Tennessee to serve one year or longer will obey the orders of Gen. Gillem, who is authorized to organize such new regi- ments as may be deemed expedient. Officers of the commissary and quartermaster de- partments will furnish the necessary supplies upon the requisition of Gen. Gillem. ANDREW JOHNSON, Brigadier-General and Military Governor of Tennessee. Immediately after its organization the brigade began its march to *Report of Gen Schofield. =eHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 495 ast Tennessee, where it arrived about the middle of the same month. August 22 .a-skirmish occurred at Rogersville, soon after which the com- mand took position at Bull’s Gap. While there it was learned that Gen. Morgan with his command were at Greeneville, and an immediate ad- vance was made upon that place. ‘“On the evening* of September 3, at 6 o’clock a courier renored to ‘Col. Miller, then in command of the brigade, that the enemy, in heavy force, were advancing and were in camp about two miles west of Greene- ville. After a short consultation of the commanding officers it was decided to move at once, and at 11 o’clock the Thirteenth Tennessee Cav- alry was ordered to proceed to Greeneville, passing around the enemy’s flank. At 12 o'clock the remainder of the command moved out. The night was very dark and the rain fell in torrents, but the troops pushed on and at 6 o’clock in the morning they came upon the pickets of the enemy, who were attacked by the Tenth Michigan Cavalry, then in advance, and with the whole force driven back about three miles. By that time the Thirteenth had joined the rear and began an attack, which, with a charge made by the Ninth, scattered them in all directions; some forty being taken prisoners. Meanwhile two companies, | and G, of the ‘Thirteenth, had been sent into the town; there they surprised Gen. Mor- gan and his staff, who were ata Mrs. Williams’. Morgan ran out and attempted to escape, but was shot and instantly killed by Andrew Camp- bel, a private of Company G. The two companies captured the staff, and taking the body of Morgan upon a horse, returned to their command with- out having lost a man. The entire column then moved into the town, where they found the enemy’s artillery planted upon College Hill. A flank moyement by the Ninth and Thirteenth Regiments soon dislodged it, and the entire command fled in confusion, leaving two pieces of artil- lery, several wagons, and other equipments. They were driven about four miles, when the pursuit was abandoned. On September 27 a sharp fight occurred at Watauga, in which the command lost 15, killed and wounded. Another skirmish took place at Greeneville, on October 12. On October 27, the brigade left New Market, and during the day met the enemy and drove them back. On the next day the command moved forward until within one mile of Morristown, where they found the enemy in line ready to receive them, with the Ninth and Thirteenth Regiment in front and the Eighth in the rear to support the artillery; a charge was made, but it failed to break the Confederate line, a sabre charge was then ordered. This perowee more See the line was broken, and *This Ate tion of the battle at Greeneville is taken from an account of it written at the time by a Ten- messee officer.if EAI 2e Re eee. roo a age MON ep yes 3 iD pagar ne ee oe a ee Sa Teepe TRI ~ — i ie ST a aiouris nha —_— a = ——— SOS se > te TT SEIT ae ee pee - STREETS SIT GNIS SS eae 7 a ee ae a ae Sa er ol ep ee OE ~ a a e : eer a - - aS DP. Lae ; Ne : 2 — as : = “ 4 " a eee: oe : py ee eS ee ape ’ eer —— 7 eo ae os 2 ioe 232 = —— = tm Lae ne: > aes a al 496 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. McClung’s battery captured with a loss to the enemy of about 300: killed, wounded and captured.” From this time notLing but scout‘and guard duty was done until November 9, when the brigade assembled at Bull’s Gap, where two days later it was confronted by the Confederates under Gen. Breckinridge, by whom, on the 12th, an unsuccessful assault was made. At nightfallon the following day the brigade withdrew from the Gap. After having pro- ceeded about ten miles an attack was made upon the rear, causing a stampede among the pack-mules and wagon-trains, and producing the greatest confusion. The artillery and several hundred men were captured, and the remainder of the force driven back to Strawberry Plains and thence to Knoxville. As soon as the report of Gillem’s defeat reached Gen. Thomas he ordered Gen. Stoneman from Louisville, to take com- mand of the forces in Hast Tennessee. The latter immediately ordered Gen. Burbridge to march with all his available force in Kentucky, by the way of the Cumberland Gap, to join Gillem. At the same time Gen. Ammon, who had been co-operating with Gen. Gillem, received a re-en- forcement of 1,500 men from Chattanooga, and at once occupied Straw- berry Plains. Having quickly concentrated the commands of Gens. Burbridge and Gillemat Bean’s Station, on the 12th of December Gen. Stoneman started for Bristol, his advance under Gillem striking the enemy under Duke at Kingsport, killing, capturing, or dispersing the whole command. The entire force then pushed on to Wytheville, meeting and completely rout- ing the enemy under Vaughn, at Marion, Va. Having destroyed a large amount of supplies of all kinds at Wytheville, Gen. Stoneman turned his attention to Saltville and its important salt works, which were captured and destroyed.* The command then returned to Knoxville, where it arrived on December 29, having marched an average of forty-two miles every twenty-four hours since its departure. It remained in camp until March 21, when such portion as was mounted joined Gen. Stoneman upon his greatraid. The vote for governor, at the election March 4, 1865, indicates the relative strength of the regiments at that time. It was as follows: Highth, 384; Ninth, 606; Thirteenth, 259; Battery E, 79. After the close of hostilities many Confederates who returned to their homes in Hast Tennessee suffered violence at the hands of Union men in retaliation for outrages committed at the beginning of the war. This soon ceased, however; and at the present time there is no place perhaps in the United States where there is a more fraternal spirit existing be- tween the Unionist and the ex-Confederate than in East Tennessee. Ten- _ *In his report of the expedition, Gen Stoneman gives the Thirteenth Tennessee Cavalry the honor of having acted the most conspicuous part in the capture of Saltville.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 497 nessee furnished about 30,000 troops to the Federal Army. They were mustered as follows: Eight regiments of infantry, eight regiments of mounted infantry, thirteen regiments of cavalry and five battalions of light artillery. But in addition to these regiments there were also en- listed, within the limits of the State, about 17,000 colored troops, the precise number of which cannot be ascertained, as they were enrolled as United States troops without regard to State boundaries. The State also contributed to the Federal Army a large number of efficient officers. In addition to those colonels and lieutenant-colonels who from time to time commanded brigades, Tennessee furnished the following brigadier-generals: Samuel P. Carter, Joseph A. Cooper, Al- van OG. Gillem, James G. Spears, William B. Campbell and Andrew Johnson, the military governor, the first three of whom were also major- generals by brevet. The colonels who were brevetted brigadier-gener- als were William J. Smith, George Spalding and James P. Brownlow. Goy. Johnson, upon the organization of the State government in 1862, appointed Alvan C. Gillem adjutant-general, a position which he contin- ued to hold until the election of Gov. Brownlow, when he was succeeded by James P. Brownlow. On August 1, 1864, Lieut. Edward S. Rich- ards was appointed assistant adjutant-general. The first Union regiment of Tennessee Infantry was organized by Col. R. K. Byrd, at Camp Dick Robinson, Ky., in August, 18615 > The other regimental officers at that time were James G. Spears, lieutenant- colonel; James T. Shelley, major; Leonard GC. Houk, quartermaster ; Ed- ward Maynard, adjutant; Robert L. Stanford, surgeon; William A. Rog- ers, assistant surgeon, and Samuel L. Williams, chaplain. This regi- ment was first under fire in the engagement at Wild Cat, and was atter- ward present at the battle of Mill Springs. It also assisted in the capt- ure of Cumberland Gap, where it remained until the evacuation of that post by Gen. Morgan. It then retreated with the remainder of the com- mand to Ohio, and thence went on an expedition up the Kanawha Valley. Returning, it went by the way of Louisville to Nashville, arriving in time to participate in the battle at Stone River, after which it returned to Lexington, Ky. It then entered Hast Tennessee under Burnside’s command and was present at the siege of Knoxville. During the winter of 1864 it was stationed at Kingston, and in the spring entered upon the Atlanta campaign, participating in all of the engagements until just pre- vious to the surrender of the city, when the greater portion of the regi- ment was discharged on account of the expiration of their term of service. While at Cumberland Gap a detachment of this and the Second Reg- iment, consisting of sixty-nine men, led by Capt. Meyers and Lieut. a RT a aSe LE ae oe, Keats: 2 De Riteely tim SG ek sm ir SRS : ea FETT, ae py —— = pate —= ot ri 3 ea — - oe > a) a a a sii 5% a y a ; ea chalagniaen pte Asan oe 7 z pane me its ape WP De weir ancrs See ‘ ~ a = =. : eer ee eee ase ne . = iieani : SSS ee os . relma 7 eae ec | ~ si . = vette eae tea Aa ie IO 7 ote ess N ee ERS» Ng EAP ee aed — - : fia NATTA TE ee oe ae een LT ae on Ae a = F Sn ane a ale ~ eee % b yp tem tanh nee tte aa en 498 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Rogers, captured an important outpost of the Confederates without the: loss of aman. For this exploit a complimentary notice was read on dress parade, by order of Gen. Morgan. The Second Union Tennessee Volunteer Infantry was recruited and organized at Camp Dick Robinson, Ky., with James P. Carter* as colo- nel; D. C. Trewhitt, lieutenant-colonel; M. Cleaveland, major; A. Neat, surgeon; D. A. Carpenter, lieutenant and adjutant; George W. Keith, quartermaster, and W. J. Keith, commissary sergeant. The regiment was mustered into service to date from the 28th of September, 1861, and on the 18th of October following marched to meet the Confederate forces under Gen. Zollicoffe:. From that time until the evacuation of Cum- berland Gap by the Federal forces under Gen. George W. Morgan in Sep- tember, 1862, the regiment was employed in eastern Kentucky, partici- pating in the battles of Mill Springs and many lesser engagements. It then marched through northeastern Kentucky, crossed into Ohio and thence entered the Kanawha Valley, W. Va. Returning by the way of Point Pleasant, Ohio, it went from there to Louisville by river, thence by land to Murfreesboro, where it was engaged in the battle of Stone’s Riv- er. It remained there until March 10, 1863, when it returned to Ken- tucky for the purpose of being mounted, which was done about June ie 1863. It remained in Kentucky, participating in various minor engage- ments with the Confederate forces under Pegram and Scott, until July 4, when it started in pursuit of Gen. Morgan in his raid through Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, and was present at his capture. It then returned to. Stanford, Ky., and joined the force under Gen. Burnside for the cam- paign in Hast Tennessee. In was in the advance of Burnside’s forces at Wolf Creek and Loudon, Tenn., and was present at the surrender of Cumberland Gap by the Confederate Gen. Frazier. It also took the ad- vance of the column which moved into upper East Tennessee from Knox- ville, and brought on and participated in the battle of Blue Springs. After pursuing the retreating forces to Abingdon, Va., and destroying a large amount of stores, it returned to Rogersville, Tenn., where, on No- vember 6, 1863, the regiment was captured by Gen. Jones. One hun- dred and seventeen men, most of whom had been captured, but soon af- ter made their escape, reported at Knoxville and were on duty there during the siege up to the 31st of November. Soon after thé remnants of the regiment were gathered up and were detailed, as provost guards, to duty at Sevierville, Maryville, Clinton and Maynardsville. In Sep- tember, 1864, the garrison at Maryville, consisting of twenty-eight men, was captured. The remaining detachments were then ordered immedi- *Resigned March 2, 1864; succeeded by J. M. Melton.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 499 ately to Lee’s Ferry, on the Clinch River, to harrass Wheeler’s forees, who were then on a raid through East Tennessee. After this expedition the regiment returned to Knoxville, where, on October 6, 1864, 1t was i} mustered out of service, there being at that time only 106 of the orig- inal number. 5 The Third Union Regiment of Tennessee Infantry was organized at Flat Lick, Ky., by Col. Leonidas C. Houk and Lieut. John C, Childs in March, 1862. The other field and staff officers were William Cross, major; Daniel M. Ray, adjutant; John D. Lewis, quartermaster; Will- iam A. Rodgers, surgeon; John P. Blankinship, assistant surgeon ; Will- iam F. Dowell, chaplain; John L. Shipe, sergeant-major; Elijah W. Adkins, quartermaster-sergeant. Tt remained near Flat Lick until June, then, with Spear’s Brigade, went to Cumberland Gap, but was subse- quently ordered to London, Ky. Here the regiment was divided, five companies under Col. Houk remaining at that place, and the other five companies under Lieut.-Col. Childs going to Richmond. Houk having been attacked by a superior force under Gen. Scott retreated to Cumber- land Gap, and subsequently, with Morgan, to Ohio. The five companies under Childs while on their way to rejoin Houk at Loudon, were attacked by Scott’s cavalry at Big Hill, and the greater part of the command captured. The remainder made their way to Richmond, Ky., where, on - August 23, 1862, all but about 100 were taken prisoners and paroled. The few who escaped retreated to Louisville, and were temporarily attached to the Third Kentucky Infantry, with which command they took part in the battle of Perryville. They were then ordered to Gallipolis, Ohio, where the regiment was reunited. It then went to Nashville, and thence to Murfreesboro. In April, 1863, Col. Houk and Lieut.-Col. Childs resigned, and the regiment then stationed at Carthage was placed under the command of Maj. William Cross, who, a short time after, was commissioned colonel. In August the regiment left Carthage, and marched by the way of Alexandria and McMinnville to a point on the Tennessee River below Chattanooga. It remained in the vicinity ot Chattanooga until November, when it proceeded to Knoxville to the relief of Burnside. April 26, 1864, it left Strawberry Plains to enter upon the Atlanta campaign, in which it took an active part. After the surrender of Atlanta it was ordered to Johnsonville, thence to Duck River, and finally to Columbia. Before reaching the latter place, however, the approach of Hood forced it back to Nashville, which it reached by the way of Charlotte and Clarksville, arriving in time to participate in the battles before that city. After pursuing the enemy to Clifton, Tenn., it returned to Nashville, and was there mustered out February 23, 1865, — naar toe 78 oan ne a ae ane a ae, aE ee = Se RT Ss a eer = can eget ererne oe ie eee ea — Se caine aan oaaangeanl een es “4 Sa a Boa iwi wens ae “= ee | Serco Se oe oe * Ta emenaneene, f — # _ ty " be BR I TOT SETI ei aia ai = eae rare ae ‘ mee <=: SS = P ‘ Pn re Payers Sp ee ee = ~ — ae ee aka hinge ou emegene F ee a ee eee ative tPA Ee os TTT ee sola * = ete é : = ae - - es 3 § : fl re == ™: ul ~~ : —— ele ee ~ ~ Ss ru ae . io ere cea sp lames "ate . - generate ETS = ~ — Tra eer — at, c es poate S en ss a ras ae coe pipe eee "3 ee » IS 7 eis = aaa Tate = et = eee enn - - S , gaa Ren eee * non , = SS — eaiene Lol cane ae é oo i : wa a cache aoeete nF weary a —S = a eet 2 ne . 500 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. the regiment at that time numbering about 340 of the original com- mand. During its existence it numbered 990 enlisted men. The Fourth Union Regiment of Tennessee Infantry was recruited 1 7 : 1¢ : r . Wy > * A ~ 7P « ander the direction of Col. Daniel Stover, of Carter County, Tenn., at Louisville, in the spring of 1863. It was composed wholly of exiles from il : a ee ao Hast Tennessee, who were brought out of the Confederate lines by officers May 29 the regiment left Louis- ville, and was mustered into service in the following June. and pilots sent in for that purpose. September 9, 1863, under the command of Maj. M. L. Patterson, it marched to McMinnville, Tenn., where, on the 3d of October, after two hours’ hard fighting against a greatly superior force under Gen. Wheeler, it was captured and paroled. Maj. Patterson, with forty men, returned to Nashville, and the remainder of the regiment, with few exceptions, returned to their homes in Hast Tennessee. Upon the arrival of Maj. Patterson in Nashville a court of inquiry was appointed to examine into the circumstances connected with the surrender of the post at McMinn- ville, which resulted in his complete exoneration from all charges. He then proceeded to Camp Nelson, Ky., to reorganize the regiment, where many of the soldiers reported immediately for duty, the paroles being invalid, having been given in violation of the cartel. January 20, 1864, the regiment was assigned to the First Brigade, Third Division, Twenty- third Army Corps. On the withdrawal of Gen. Schofield’s army from upper Hast Tennessee, the regiment was sent to Loudon, and three com- panies, under Maj. Reeves, to Kingston, Maj. Patterson having been promoted to the lheutenant-coloneley, was detached to command the bri- gade with headquarters at Loudon. The regiment remained there until November, 1864, when the troops were ordered to Knoxville. ieut,- Col. Patterson was then put in command of a brigade consisting of the Fourth Tennessee and Third North Carolina Infantry for an expedition to Paint Rock, N. C., to cut off the retreat of the Confederates from Gen. Stoneman. “This expedition ended about January 10, 1865. The reg- iment remained in upper East Tennessee and vicinity until July, when it was ordered to Nashville to be mustered out. ized the regiment, was early attacked by ice in the field. Col. Stover, who organ- consumption and saw no sery- The Fifth Union Regiment of Tennessee Infantry was organized at Barboursville, Ky., by Col. James T. Shelley, of Roane County, in March, S62) “As ‘a part of Spear’s brigade it particip ated in the operations around Cumberland Gap during the : summer of 1862, also in the retreat from that place, and subsequently in the battle of Stone River. It was present at Chickamauga, and took an active part in the battle of MissionHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. dOL Ridge. In the Georgia campaign it formed a part of Manson’s brigade, and with the remainder of the Twenty-third Corps returned to fight Hood before Nashville. The organization of the Sixth Union Regiment of Tennessee Infant- ry was begun in the early part of March, 1862, by Col. Joseph A. Cooper, at Barboursville, Ky., and, like most of the other regiments from Tennessee, was composed mainly of Unionist refugees. On April 23, four companies being completed, a lieutenant-colonel, Edward May- nard, was appointed. By May 1 three other companies were completed and the following field and staff officers had been appointed: William C. Pickens, major; Henry H. Wiley, quartermaster; William Cary, quar- termaster-sergeant; Ayres Maupin, surgeon, and Henry W. Parker, adjutant. The regiment actively participated in the opening movements of the Seventh Division of the Army of the Ohio, under Gen. G. W. Morgan, in the vicinity of Cumberland Gap, where it remained until September 17, 1862, when it took up the line of march in Morgan’s fa- mous retreat to the Ohio River. After being refitted it remained at Gal- lipolis, Ohio, until November 11, when the brigade to which it was attached was ordered to Nashville. During the battle of Stone River it was detailed as an escort for an ammunition train for Rosecrans’ army. A short distance from Nashville it was attacked by the Confederate cayv- alry under Wheeler, who was immediately repulsed with considerable loss. It remained at Murfreesboro until April, 1863, when it was at- tached to the First Brigade, Second Division, Fourteenth Army Corps, and from that time until September, was employed in drilling and scout- ing in the vicinities of Carthage, Alexandria and MeMinnvyille. About September 10, it crossed the mountains and moyed toward Chattanoo- ga, arriving in time to participate in the close of the battle of Chicka- mauga, as a part of Granger’s reserve corps. The regiment was then stationed on the river above Chattanooga until it joined the forces that moved to the relief of Burnside at Knoxville. It was engaged in the campaign of East Tennessee during the following winter. In April, 1864, having been transferred to the Second Division, Twenty-Third Army Corps, Department of the Ohio, it moved to join Sherman in his campaign to Atlanta. In this it took an active part, losing heavily at Resaca. » After the capture of Atlanta the brigade was ordered to report to Gen. Thomas at Nashville, and was located at Johnsonville and Duck River until the advance of Hood compelled a retreat. The regiment reached Nashville by the way of Charlotte and Clarksville, and partici- pated in the battles around that city on the 15th and 16th of December. It was then transferred to North Carolina and joined Sherman’s forcesSS ae ay ae al SE EP ee —— =z SRT ~ ae a tex 7 ea a Re eee ee LS a cae ii Tepe ta LTE lhe. 9 eames : Ps aa aes ei patentee 9S wg repent eamece seers eS i Cakes a een a ema ear arden ee el eae TN, . TIS en Aga Ee ee SIT woke ee em aetetemercsniid anne a ea —_ i at at nt re OD aN ED SS : - aesege a ee SaaS Sasi a 7 od o one Fig OF a = eerie meee = —s 7 " gape arent Ta a EI ay arte nr —ceameemar eee sgniescer anit tagecene its ete TT GO NTE a —— aie z Sara ss — ms - 3 SEO BS Seeeties “ae ‘ a as meee ga ee eae RN anc O02 TENNESSEE. at Goldsboro, where it remained until March 3, 1865. The regiment was then returned to Nashville and was mustered out on April 27, 1865, having served a few days over three years. The Seventh Union Regiment of Tennessee Infantry was never or- ganized, and the companies raised for it were transferred to other reg- iments. he Highth Union Regiment of Tennessee Infantry was recruited from East Tennessee exiles and refugees at Nicholsville, Lexington, Camp Dick Robinson and other points in Kentucky, by Col. Felix A. Reeve, assisted by John B. Brownlow and H. H. Thomas. The work of recruiting was begun in the fall of 1862, but owing to the fact that sey- eral cavalry regiments, which were more popular with the foot-sore refu- gees, were proposed at the same time, volunteers for infantry service were not numerous, and it was not until August 1863, that the regiment numbering about 700 men was organized. It was then assigned to the Second Brigade, Second Division, Twenty-Third Army Corps, Depart- ment of the Ohio, and was present at Knoxville during the siege of that place. In April, 1864, it marched to join Sherman on his Atlanta cam- paign, in which it took a very active part, participating in every engage- ment. At Utowah Creek, near Atlanta, it was in the advance, and about 100 men of the regiment were killed and wounded in less than fifteen minutes. The Hight Regiment also bore an honorable part in the bat- tles of Jonesboro, Ga., and Columbia, Franklin and Nashville, Tenn. In January, 1865, with the remainder of the Army of the Ohio, it was: transferred to North Carolina, where it participated in the actions at Fort Anderson, Town Creek and Wilmington. command of the regiment in July, 1864. Col. Reeve resigned The major of the regiment when organized was George D. La Vergne, who was promoted to leu- tenant-colonel in October, 1863, in place of Isham Young, resigned. tem PB) The Ninth Union Regiment of Tennessee Infantry was never mus- tered into service, it being transferred and merged into other regiments before it was completely organized. The Tenth Union Regiment of Tennessee Infantry was organized at Nashville, about July, 1862, and was at first known as the First Tennes- see Governor’s Guards. It was recruited partly in Nashville, and partly in Rutherford, Wayne, Hardin and Lawrence Counties, and was com- posed of a mixture of Americans, Irish and Germans. Until the sum- mer of 1863 the regiment did provost guard duty at Nashville, being encamped first at Fort Gillem, and afterward upon the Capitol grounds. It was then ordered out to guard the Nashville & North-western Rail- road, where it remained until the spring of 1864. During the followingHISTORY OF TENNESSER. 03 year the regiment was divided up considerably, detachments being de- tailed for various purposes. In the spring of 1865 it was ordered to Knoxville, at which place and at Greeneville, it remained until about July, when it was returned to Nashville and mustered out. It was ommended at first by Col. A. C. Gillem, and afterward by Col. James W. Scully. The First Union Regiment of Tennessee Cavalry was organized at Camp Dennison, Ohio, November 1, 1862, with Robert Johnson as col- onel; James P. Brownlow, lieutenant-colonel; James O. Berry and Will- iam R. Tracy, majors; Pleasant M. Logan, surgeon; James H. Jones, assistant surgeon; John P. Hotsinger, chaplain; Charles H. Bentley adju- tant; John H. James, quartermaster: McK. C. Williams and Franklin Highbarger, sergeant-majors. The regiment was then ordered to Ten- nessee, and in the organization of the cavalry, Department of the Cumber- land was united with the First Brigade, First Division. The ensuing sum- mer, with the forces of Gen. Rosecrans, it entered on the campaign which resulted in the occupation of Tullahoma and Chattanooga, participating in engagements at Rover, Middleton, Guyer’s Gap, Shelbyville and Cow- a : —— a a re aa ie ee eer — na pret = 2 : 3 ———— mene ee oes = i mT I : 5 a — - — -- aren : - ~ yy eee an’s Station. After an expedition through northern Alabama and Geor- gia under Lieut.-Col. Brownlow, it reached Chickamauga, and participated in the three days’ battle of September 18-20, 1863. It was then sent in pursuit of Gen. Wheeler, going by the way of McMinnville, Shelby- +} il | Ih a tat 7 1 a hal i ee at at : rriakoy | t ville and Murfreesboro, a detachment being sent to Sparta. The regi- ment afterward proceeded to Kingston, Knoxville, Strawberry Plains, New Market, Dandridge and Mossy Creek. At the last two places engage- ments with the Confederate cavalry, in greatly superior force, were had, but by gallant charges under skillful leadership the regiment succeeded in escaping with little injury. It then remained in that vicinity until April, 1864, when it began a march to Resaca, Cassville, Dallas and Pine Mountain, Ga., and thence to a raid on the Macon Railroad, where an engagement occurred. After some hard fighting it reached the Chatta- hoochee River on August 1, and while crossing the stream was attacked by the enemy, who succeeded in taking a large number of prisoners. Col. Brownlow reached Marietta two days later with afew men and there was joined by the more fortunate fugitives. During Gen. Wheeler’s raid through Middle Tennessee the regiment was in engagements with him at La Vergne, Franklin and Campbellsville, and followed him upon his re- treat to Florence. It then returned to Pulaski and had a skirmish with Gen. Forrest, after which it continued to scout along the Tennessee until atter the defeat of Hood, when it went in pursuit of his forces. After a reconnoissance as far as Corinth, in January, 1865, the regiment returned to Nashville, where it was mustered: out June 14, 1865.Besa ee Le a s im! Le i, Weel: 5 Tes \¢ aly : 4 Piss | ; 7 ao thay ae: st ae ye} ; #45) * ieee eres: 1 eee Lal Peel veri) | j f ‘Gerke ai) oF el! eR; Fhe wit 2 chat! ‘ i Bit ?] Wehiie: 7 b t hs eae TG fj i Veena Bl en | i if il Pew ert! ah) ei ata a ee a \ rae (ada! a ttt | i t erg a aa ie VPOHBS ep thie cap ky pasihts) Ae { j : ; WAS beans } ut ‘ wile t oie f a 1:3 een Pesiiite be ted the ‘ Heend |) piag | Whetee Bl 4 / h A AY TR a Media thee ia Bie ha Ke 3} tee ult i heed | iG G+ Geog j ay Fag a fae aie | i abe | ‘ny an eee | en Hee i tial tee } j { Lee ae so A RE —< amma ene op a = et , = ao. = aa aon : ; senate :: a Ch nt ‘ ie ny ae = ———— eed a. Te Re om oo P ~ ee SR Delanhitags = aaran S = wmentetncginy 4 oe ees 5 —_ Tee . Teen ty ole - = 5O4 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The Second Union Regiment of Tennessee Cavalry was organized at Cumberland Gap in the months of August and September, 1862, under Col. D. M. Ray and Lieut.-Col. W. R. Cook, and was composed of loyal citizens of Knox, Blount, Sevier and surrounding counties, numbering in the aggregate about 1,175 men. Shortly after the organization of the regiment Gen. Morgan began his retreat to the Ohio River, and the Sec- ond Cavalry, although dismounted, rendered efficient service in protect- ing the flank and rear of the retreating column. Not long after its ar- rival at Gallipolis, Ohio, it was ordered to Louisville where it was mounted and armed, and pushed on to join Rosecrans at Nashville. arrived in time to participate in the battle of Stone River, where it lost several officers and men. From that time until the 23d of June, 1863, with the remainder of the Federal cavalry under Gen. Stanley, it was em- ployed on the front and flanks of Rosecrans army, doing severe duty. At the latter date it moved with the army from Murfreesboro to Tullahoma pursuing Bragg across the Cumberland Mountains. About July 10 it was ordered to report to Gen. Sheridan for special duty, and was em- ployed in the vicinity of Bridgeport, Alabama, and Chattanooga until the early part of September, when it rejoined the cavalry command under Gen. Stanley and participated in the battle of Chickamauga. After do- ing some escort duty it was ordered to Washington and Kingston, and assisted in the defense of the latter place against Gen. Wheeler. It was then ordered to Nashville, hastily refitted, and forwarded to Gen. Will- iam §. Smith at Memphis for an expedition into Mississippi, in the course of which it participated with credit in engagements at Okolona, West Point, Tallahatchie River and elsewhere. On its return to Nash- ville in March, 1864, Col. Ray having resigned, Maj. W. F. Prosser was commissioned lieuteuant-colonel and placed in command. following the Second, Third and Fourth Regiments of Tennessee Cavalry, with Battery A of the First Tennessee Light Artilery, were ordered to North Alabama and remained on duty in that district until the end of the year. In the numerous engagements with the Confederate cavalry dur- ing that time the Second Cavalry displayed great g allantry, and received the commendation of all the general officers under whom it served. In the pursuit of Hood’s retreating army the command to which it was at- tached marched 280 miles in seven days and nights of unusually severe weather, and during that time were eng In the June aged in six different actions, capt- uring a large number of prisoners and material of every descr From January to July, 1865, when it was muste on duty at Vicksburg and New Orleans. The organization of the T iption. red out, the regiment was hird Union Regiment of Tennessee Volun-_ a HISTORY OF TENNESSER. 5O5 teer Cavalry was commenced at Cumberland Gap, by Ma}. William C. Pickens, of Sevier County, acting under authority from Gov. Johnson. The first recruits were received August 10, 1862, and at the evacuation of that post by Gen. Morgan, only one company had been completed. This company shared in the retreat to Ohio and thence went to Louis- ville, where it was joined by the recruits of Companies B, C, D and E. These companies were ordered to Nashville as guards for government stores, arriving December 24, 1862, when they were temporarily attached to Gen. Spears’ brigade. They were then ordered to the front and parti- cipated in the battle of Stone River. On January 27, 1863, the five companies were mustered into service at Murfreesboro, and the remain- der of that year was spent in scouting and skirmishing with the enemy through various parts of Middle Tennessee. During that time four more companies were recruited and mustered into service. About De- cember 25, 1863, the regiment under the command of Lieut.-Col. Duff G. Thornburgh was attached to a brigade of cavalry under Col. D. M. Ray, of the Second Tennessee Cavalry, and marched upon the expedi- tion into Mississippi, participating in all the engagements of that cam- paign. While at Colliersville, Tenn., in February, 1864, Lieut-Col. Thornburgh turned over the command of the regiment to Maj. John B. Minnis, and soon after tendered the resignation of his command, which was reluctantly accepted. The regiment returned to Nashville in March and remained there until April 10. From that time until September, as a whole or in detachments, it was engaged in scouting or skirmishing. On September 924 and 25, 1864. the entire regiment with the exception of 15 officers and some 200 men, were captured at Athens and Sulphur Brook Trestle, by the Confederates under Gen. Forrest. The captured officers were exchanged December 15. The privates were exchanged at Jackson, Miss., and on April 27, following, the steamer “Sultana,” having them with a large number of other troops on board, blew up near Mem- phis, killing instantly 174 members of the regiment and mortally wound- ing a number of others. The remainder of the regiment was mustered out June 10, 1865. The Fourth Union Regiment of Tennessee Cavalry was organized from East Tennessee refugees, at Cumberland Gap, in July, 1862. and entered the field under the command of Lieut.-Col. J. M. Thornburgh. After leaving that place it followed the course of the other regiments otf Gen. Morgan’s command, and reached Nashville January 206, 1868. At that place and Murfreesboro, it did post and scout service during the remainder of the year. It then went with Gen. Smith on his expedition into Mississippi, returning to Nashville March 18, 1864. On June 19 5 AY i} A f Lt : ' \ | abet \ t seamed abit bi ed 1oyiht ' i ate | bial ; i } iy \\'gt ii Po bene : ih Pil ' i} . j if | etal titi i 7 : ‘ Staak } aie i} ; Wy j ale | iat ie feit } ait t tah 7 i a : ; \j +] i ah il { 1) ba 1 4! fae ' i eet : i 3] f i 7. ! Hine un ; iH} 1 { } a4 id i } { pis ‘ } | : Ww i TI 1 TBAT i | i it i Heuta iii i | } ra) ‘ ita | ' t ‘ } 4 | ib lay \ : > i i 41 j { Lf ey hy i | mitt 4 Sita Beata i » : als: a +} i ay ih ij ij i ii : 4 ! : un a IT Asnaeinieie tenia tied ati i ae ae a = ae ree St he Se EE - iE inane a sa Zea om, eee es in Me ace ee * Senate ae oo a = EE ele a napeeaiaanaieainl ee a E a Sete. Rae er. Cee ~ eae er. TT eae = aa Be ae : we oe = < 5 - is a ea ‘Hughes, Bledsoe and Ferguson declared a war DOG ‘TORY OF TENNESSER. 5O6 HISTORY OF TENNE it was ordered to Decatur, Ala., andin July marched with Gen. Rousseau on his raid through Alabama, reaching Marietta, Ga., on the 23d of sina month. It then accompanied Gen. McCook on a raid south and west of Atlanta, in which it lost nearly all its horses and arms in crossing the @hattahoochic River. On the 10th of August it returned to Decatur, Ala., and was assigned to post and scout duty under Gen. Granger until the 19th of that month, when it was ordered to Nashville. On Novem- ber 27, it advanced to meet Gen. Hood, and participated in nearly all the battles of that campaign. It was then ordered to the Gulf Department and accompanied Gen. Canby through the Mobile campaign, after which it went to Baton Rouge. It arrived at Nashville June 12, 1865. Com- pany C, was detached from December, 1863, to April, 1864, for duty at the headquarters of the Twelfth Army Corps at Tullahoma. The other companies served without intermission with the regiment. The Fifth Union Regiment of Tennessee Cavalry was recruited and organized in Middle Tennessee by Col. William B. Stokes acting under authority from Goy. Johnson, in July, 1862. It was made up at Nash- ville principally, the recruits coming in from various counties in squads. It was first known as the First Middle Tennessee Cavalry, but was sub- sequently changed to the Fifth Tennessee. The regiment was in various battles and skirmishes during the latter part of 1862, actively partici- pating in the battle of Stone River from first to last, closing the fight on the Manchester pike on Monday evening, January 5, 1863. From that time until the close of the war the regiment was employed mainly in detachments, in the eastern part of Middle Tennessee. One battalion was stationed at Shelbyville for some time, and did good service ina number of battles and skirmishes, for which it received high compliments from its superior officers. The other portion of the regiment under Col. Stokes was stationed at Carthage, and had frequent skirmishes; among other duties, it was required to carry the mail fr since, om that point to Gallatin. A portion of the regiment was in the battle of Lookout Mountain under command of Capt. Cain and Lieut. Carter. - os - 3 5 Saran. Lene eee 7 = Se se ep p he eee : Se ee eed Me P ~ - - eae : — — ro ar Ee organization of the volunteer militia forces of West Tennessee. 520 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. this session the Powell River Lead Mining Company, the Bumpass Cove Lead Mining Company, the Hickman County Saltpeter Company, the Confederate Paper-Mill Company in Shelby County, the Nashville Gun By the 4th of May there were stationed in West Tennessee, mainly at Memphis and Jackson, thirty-nine Factory and the Memphis Arms Company. companies of infantry, two companies of cavalry, two companies of artil- lery and one company of sappers and miners.* On the 6th of May the following bill was passed: An Act To SUBMIT TO A VOTE OF THE PEOPLE A DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. Section 1. Be zt enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, That im- mediately after the passage of this act the governor of this State shall, by proclamation, direct the sheriffs of the several counties in this State to open and hold an election at the various voting precincts in their respective counties, on the 8th day of June, 1861.. That said sheriffs, or in the absence of the sheriffs, the coroner of the county shall immediately advertise the election contemplated by this act. That said sheriffs appoint a deputy to hold said election for each voting precinct. And that said deputy appoint three judges and two clerks for each precinct, and if no officer shall from any cause, attend any voting precinct to open and hold said election, then any justice of the peace, or in the absence of a justice of the peace, any respectable freeholder may appoint an officer, judges and clerks to open and hold said election; said officers, judges and clerks shall be sworn as now required by law, and who, after being so sworn, shall open and hold an election, open and close at the time of day, and in the manner now required by law in elections for members to the General Assembly. Sec. 2. Bett further enacted, That at said election the following declaration shall be submitted to a vote of the qualified voters of the State of Tennessee, for their ratification or rejection: DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AND ORDINANCE DISSOLVING THE FEDERAL RELATIONS BETWEEN THE STATE OF TENNESSEE AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. First, We, the people of the State of Tennessee, waiving any expression of opinion as to the abstract doctrine of secession, but asserting the right as a free and independent people, to alter, reform or abolish our form of government in such manner as we think proper, do ordain and declare that all the laws and ordinances by which the State of Tennessee became a member of the Federal Union of the United States of America are hereby abrogated and annulled, and that all obligations on our part be withdrawn therefrom: and we do hereby resume all the rights, functions and powers which by any of said laws and ordinances were conveyed to the Government of the United States, and absolve ourselves from all the obligations, restraints and duties incurred thereto: and do hereby henceforth become a free, sovereign: and independent State. Second, We furthermore declare andordain that Article X, Sections 1 and 2 of the constitution of the State of Tennessee, which requires members of the General Assembly, and all officers, civil and military, to take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States (be and the same are hereby abrogated and -annulled, and all parts of the Constitution of the State of Tennessee, making citizenship of the United States a qualifi- cation for office, and recognizing the Constitution of the United States) as the supreme law of the State, are in like manner abrogated and annulled. Third, We furthermore ordain and declare that all rights acquired and vested under the Constitution of the United States, or under any act of Congress passed in pursuance thereof, or under any laws of this State and not incompatible with this ordinance, shall remain in force and have the same effect as if this ordinance had not been passed. n appointed by Goy. Harris to oversee the *Report of Gen. S. R. Anderson, who, April 26, 1861, had bee ETT ST a ai =HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Salt Suc. 3. Be it further enacted, That said election shall be by ballot; that those voting for the declaration and ordinance shall have written or printed on their ballots “Separa- tion,’ and those voting against it shall have written or printed on their ballots ‘““No Sepa- ration.” That the clerks holding said election shall keep regular ‘scrolls of the voters, as now required by law in the election of members to the General Assembly; that the clerks and judges shall certify the same with the number of votes for ‘‘Separation” and the number of votes ‘““No Separation.’’ The officer holding the election shall return the same to the sheriff of the county, at the county seat, on the Monday next after the elec- tion. The sheriff shall immediately make out, certify and send to the governor the num- ber of votes polled, and the number of votes for ‘‘Separation” and the number “No Sep- aration,’ and file one of the original scrolls with the clerk of the county court; that upon comparing the vote by the governer in the office of the secretary of State, which shall be at least by the 24th day of June, 1861—and may be sooner if the returns are all received by the governor—if a majority of the votes polled shall be for “Separation” the governor shall by his proclamation make ‘+t known and declare all connection by the State of Ten- nessee with the Federal Union dissolved, and that Tennessee is a free, independent gov- ernment, free from all obligations to or connection with the Federal Government; and that the governor shall cause the vote by counties to be published, the number for “Sepa- ration” and the number “No Separation,’ whether a majority votes for “Separation’’ or “No Separation.” Suc. 4. Be it further enacted, That in the election to be held under the provisions of this act upon the declaration submitted to the people, all volunteers and other persons connected with the service of the State, qualified to vote for members of the Legislature in the counties where they reside, shall be entitled to vote in any county in the State where they may be in active service, or under orders, or on parole at the time of said election: and all other voters shall vote in the county where they reside, as now required by law in voting for members to the General Assembly. Sc. 5. Be tt further enacted, That at the same time and under the rules and reguia- tions prescribed for the election herein before ordered, the following ordinance shall be submitted to the popular vote, to wit: An ORDINANCE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE PROVISIONAL GOVERN- MENT OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA. We, the people of Tennessee, solemnly impressed by the perils which surround us, do hereby adopt and ratify the constitution of the provisional government of the Jonfed- erate States of America, ordained and established at Montgomery, Ala., on the 8th day of February, 1861, to be in force during the existence thereof, or until such time as we may supersede it by the adoption of a permanent constitution. Sno. 6. Be it further enacted, That those ‘n favor of the adoption of said provisional constitution and thereby securing to Tennessee equal representation in the deliberations and councils of the Confederate States shall have written or printed on their ballots the word ‘‘Representation,” those opposed the words ‘No Representation.” Suc. 7. Be it further enacted, That ‘n the event the people shall adopt the constitu- tion of the provisional government of the Confederate States at the election herein or- dered, it shall be the duty of the governor forthwith to issue writs of election for dele- gates to represent the State of Tennessee in the said provisional government. That the State shall be represented by as many delegates as it was entitled to members of Congress to the recent Congress of the United States of America, who shall be elected from the several congressional districts as NOW established by law, in the mode and manner now prescribed for the election of members to the Congress of the Jnited States. Src. 8. Be it further enacted, That this act take effect from and after its passage. W. C. WHITTHORNE, Speaker of the House of Representatives B. L. STOVALL, Speaker of the Senate. Passed May 6, 1861. pier ee eee Sy ae a i — _ — we ee ae a NRa oe : ~ . HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The following military bill was also passed: AN Act TO RAISE, ORGANIZE AND EQuiPp A PROVISIONAL FORCE AND FOR OTHER PurRposns. SECTION 1. Be tt enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, That it shall bethe duty of the governor of the State toraise, organize and equipa provisional force of vol- unteers for the defense of the State, to consist of 55,000 volunteers, 25,000 of whom, or any less number which the wants of the service may demand, shall be fitted for the field at the earliest practicable moment, and the remainder of which shall be held in reserve, ready to march at short notice. And should it become necessary for the safety of the State, the governor may Call out the whole available military strength of the State. Sec. 2. Be ct further enacted, That in the performance of this duty, the governor shall take charge of the military, direct the military defense of the State, organize the different arms, and with the concurrence of the military and financial board, hereinafter provided for, control the military fund, make contracts for arms, ordnance, ordnance stores, pro- cure material for the construction of arms, employ artificers, organize one or more armor- ies for the construction of arms, and do all other things necessary for the speedy and efti- cient organization of a force adequate for the public safety. And he shall organize a military and financial board, to consist of three persons of which he shall be ex officio president, and who shall discharge such duties as he may assign them in effecting the ob- jects and purposes of this act, and appoint such number of clerks as may be necessary under such rules and regulations as they may adopt. SEc. 3. Be zt further enacted, That the force provided for by this act, shall be organ- ized into regiments, brigades and divisions, and the whole to be commanded by the senior major-general, who shall immediately enter upon the duty of organizing the entire force for the field, the force authorized by this act, shall be mustered into service for the pe- riod of twelve months, unless sooner discharged. SEC. 4. Be it further enacted, That the staff of said force shal] consist of one adju- tant-general, one inspector-general, one paymaster-general, one commissary-general, one yuartermaster-general and one surgeon-general with such number of assistants of each as the wants of the service may require; and that the rank of quartermaster-general, inspec- tor-general, adjutant-general and commissary-general shall be that of colonel of cavalry, and the rank of their assistants shall be that of lieutenant-colonel and major of infantry and captain of cavalry, all of whom shall be appointed by the governor, subject to the confirmation of the General Assembly. in joint session; Provided, That the governor may fill vacancies in said offices, occurring when the Legislature may not be in session, and the appointees shall at once enter upon the discharge of their duties, subject to the con- firmation of the Legislature when thereafter in session. There shall likewise be appointed by the governor, subject to like confirmation, one ordnance officer, with the rank of col- onel of infantry, who shall take charge of the ordnance bureau of the State, direct the construction of arms, under the governor and milit the same, certify the fulfillment of contracts, and have the general supervision of the arm- ory of the State, with such assistants as the service may require, not exceeding three, who shall have the rank and pay of captain of infantry. The members of the military and financial board shall be nominated by the governor and confirmed bythe General Assembly. Sec. 5. Be it further enacted, That there shall be organized by the governor, a med- ical department, consisting of the surgeon-general, and two other surgeons, the members of which department shall be nominated by the governor and confirmed by the General Assembly, who shall examine all applicants for surgeon and assistant surgeon, and certify their qualifications to the governor for commission in said service, and which department Shall be subject to field service as other surgeons of the army. And the said department are hereby directed, other things being equal, to recommend from volunteer forces such regimental surgeons and assistants as the service may require. SEc. 6. Bett further enacted, That there shall be two major-generals, and such number of brigadier-generals as the proper and efficient command of ‘said force may re- quire, who shall be nominated by the governor and confirmed by the General Assembly, ary and finance board, receive or reject \HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. with power to appoint their own staff; and a chief of engineers with such assistants as the service may require, to be nominated and confirmed in the same manner. Suc. 7. Be it further enacted, That the senior major-general shall immediately enter upon the duty of organizing the whole force for the field. Sno. 8. Be it further enacted, That the governor be authorized to determine the field of duty which the safety of the State may require, and direct said forces accordingly. Src. 9. Beit further enacted, That for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this act, the governor of the State is hereby authorized to issue and dispose of five million dollars of the bonds of the State of Tennessee, similar in all respects to the bonds of the State neretofore issued, except that they shall not have more than ten years to run for maturity, and bear interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum, payable semi-annually at such point as may be therein designated; Provided, That three millions of said bonds shall be held as a contingent reserve fund, and not used unless in the opinion of the governor, by and with the concurrence and advice of the military and financial board, the exigencies of the service and the public safety imperatively demand it; and said bonds shall be in denomina- tion of not less than one hundred, or greater than one thousand dollars. Suc. 10. Beit further enacted, That the public faith and credit of the State is hereby pledged for the payment of the interest on said bonds and the final redemption of the same; and that an annual tax of eight cents on the one hundred dollars on the property, and one-half cent wpon the dollar on the sales of merchandise or invoice cost, whether bought in or out of the State of Tennessee, which said one-half of one per cent is to bein lieu of the one-fourth of one per cent now levied, be assessed and set apart. and held sacred for the payment of the interest on said bonds, and the creation of a sinking fund for their final redemption; Provided, that no more of said tax than is sufficient to pay the interest on said bonds shall be collected, until the expiration of two years from the issuance of the same, and that the whole amount of said sinking fund shall from time to time, as the same may accumulate, be used by the governor in the purshase of said bonds; Provided, They can be had at a price not excecding par rates. Seo. 11. Be it further enacted, That banks and branches purchasing said bonds from the governor, shall have the privilege of classing the bonds so purchased, in the classifica- tion of their assets, as specie funds; and that the banks of the State are hereby authorized to invest their means in said bonds; Provided, That the State shall have the right to pay said bonds so purchased and held by said banks in their own notes; and individuals own- ing said bonds, having purchased the same previously of the State, shall hold the same free from taxation, either State, county, or otherwise. Seo, 12. Be it further enacted, That in order to save expenses, 50 much of the act of the late extra session of the Legislature, as requires the supervisor to make monthly pub- lications of bank movements, be, and the same is hereby repealed. Sno. 13. Bett further enacted, That when peace shall be restored to the country, oF the present danger pass away, that the governor of the State, or other rightful authority, under which said force may be at the time acting, shall issue a proclamation declaring the fact, and shall thereafter discharge the forces raised under this act, and from and after which this act shall cease to be in force. Suc. 14. Be tt further enacted, That the county courts of this State are empowered to assess and collect a tax on property and privileges in their respective counties; to provide a fund for the relief and support of families of volunteers whilst in actual service, when, from affliction or indigence, it may be necessary ; Provided, That the said fund thus raised shall, in all cases, be expended for the benefit of the families of volunteers residing in the county where the same 1s raised: and the revenue collector, for collecting said tax, shall receive no compensation—and the same shall be paid by him, under order of the county court, to the persons to whom the same may be appropriated. Seo. 15. Be it further enacted, That the county courts be authorized to issue county scrip anticipating the tax necessary in effecting the objects of the preceding section. Sno. 16. Beit further enacted, That the county courts of this State are authorized and empowered to appoint and raise semi-annually a home euard of min ute men, whose#5 isi ac GT erhngi Rg ow oe SS ey ee —— oo a a eee. ew eet Ae Ne Gam 2 shear = mt ae ag Mt aga taro ap, ied a Et Sp eae ener hy pasar evince ican cae aha TE AT ONSET dn = mee lee HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. term of service shall be three months, in their respective limits, to consist of companies of not less than ten for each civil district, whose officers, when elected by the companies re- spectively, shall be commissioned by the county courts, and whose duty it shall be to pro- cure a warrant from some justice of the peace, and arrest all suspected persons, and bring them before the civil authorities for trial; to see that all slaves are disarmed; to prevent the assemblages of slaves in unusual numbers; to keep the slave population in proper sub- jection, and to see that peace and order is observed. The Home Guards or Minute Men shall be armed and equipped by each county at its own expense, and a tax may be assessed and collected for the purpose, as well as to compensate those engaged in this branch of duty, if, in their discretion, compensation should be made. The Home Guard shal} assemble in their respective districts to take precautionary measures at least once in each week at the call of the commanding officer, and shall be momentarily ready for service at his call. Persons engaged in this branch of duty shall, upon failure to obey the call to duty by the commander, forfeit not less than one dollar, nor more than five for each offense, to be collected in the name of the chairman of the county court, before any jus- tice of the peace, to be applied by the county court in defraying the expenses of this branch of the public service, unless such failure was the result of sickness or other good cause. A general commander shall be appointed for each county by the several county courts, whose duty it shall be, when necessary, to take charge of all the Home Guard or Minute Men in his county and direct their operations. And the county court is author- ized to issue county bonds or scrip for the purpose of raising money immediately to meet the expenses contemplated by this section. Sec. 17. Bett further enacted, That the property of all volunteers raised under the provisions of this act shall be exempt from execution and other civil process whilst in act- ual service; but this section shall not apply to the Home Guards. Sec. 18. Be it further enacted, That the governor, in raising the volunteers provided for in this act, shall have the discretion to accept into the service volunteer companies ten- dered from other States and from the Confederate States, if, in his opinion, the exigencies of the service or the public safety requires it. SEc. 19. Beit further enacted, That each regiment of infantry shall consist of one colonel, one lieutenant-colonel, one major and ten companies; each company shall con- sist of one captain, one first lieutenant, two second lieutenants, four sergeants, four cor- porals, two musicians, and not less than sixty-four nor more than ninety privates; and to each regiment there shall be attached one adjutant, to be selected from the lieuten, ants, and one sergeant-major to be selected from the enlisted men of the regiment by the colonel. The regiment of cavalry shall consist of one colonel, one lieutenant- colonel, one major and ten companies, each of which shall consist of one captain, one first lieutenant, two second lieutenants, four Sergeants, four corporals, one farrier, one blacksmith, two musicians and sixty privates. geant-major, to be selected as aforesaid. SEc. 20. Bett further enacted, That each regiment shall elect its own colonel. lieu- tenant-colonel and major, and that each company shall elect its captain, its lieutenants, sergeants and corporals. Regimental musicians shall be appointed by the colonel, and the company musicians by the captains of companies. The colonel shall appoint his staff from his command. SEC. 21. Bert further enacted, That the pay of m dollars per month; of brigadier-general two hundred and fifty dollars per month. The aid-de-camp of a major-general, in addition to his pay as lieutenant, shall receive forty dollars per month, and the aid-de- ‘amp of a brigadier-general shall receive, in addition to his pay as lieutenant, the sum of twenty-fiv e dollars per month. The monthly pay of the officers of the corps of engineers shall be as follows: Of the colonel two hundred and ten dollars; of a major, one hundred and sixty-two dollars; of a captain, one hundred and forty dollars; lieutenants serving with a company of Sappers and miners shall receive the pay of cavalry officers of thesame grade. The monthly pay of the colonel of the corps of artillery shall be two hundred and ten dollars; of a lieutenant-colonel, one hundred and There shall be one adjutant and one ser- ajor-general shall be three hundred - ane Soon Seep eennee ees NNHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. eighty-five dollars; of a major, one hundred and fifty dollars; of a captain, one hun- jred and thirty dollars; of a first lieutenant, ninety dollars; of a second lieutenant, eighty dollars; and the adjutant shall receive, in addition to his pay as lieutenant, ten dollars per month. Officers of artillery serving in the light artillery, or performing ord- nance duty, shall receive the same pay as officers of cavalry of the same grade. The monthly pay of the infantry shail be as follows: Of a colonel, one hundred and seventy-five dollars; of a lieutenant-colonel, one hundred and seventy dollars; of a major, one hundred and fifty dollars; of. a captain, one hundred and thirty dollars; of a first lieutenant, ninety dollars; of a second lieutenant, eighty dollars; the adju- tant ten dollars per month in addition to his pay as lieutenant. The monthly pay of the officers of cavalry shall be as follows: Of 2 colonel, two hundred dollars; of a lieu- tenant-colonel, one hundred and seventy-five dollars; of a major, one hundred and fifty- “two dollars; of a captain, one hundred and thirty dollars; of a first lieutenant, ninety dol- lars; of asecond lieutenant, eighty dollars; the adjutant, ten dollarsper month in addition to his pay as lieutenant. The pay of the officers of the general staff, except those of the medical department, shall be the same as officers of the second grade. The surgeon-gen- eral shall receive an annual salary of twenty-five hundred dollars, which shall be in full of all pay and allowance. The pay per month of the major-general’s staff shall be the same as officers of the same rank in the infantry service. The monthly pay of surgeon shall be the same as that of major of cavalry, and the pay of assistant surgeon shall be the same as the pay of first lieutenant of cavalry, and the rank of surgeon shall be that of major of cavalry, and that of assistant surgeon the same as of the first lieutenant of cavalry. Src. 22. Be it further enacted, That the pay of officers as herein established shall be in full of all allowances, except forage for horses actually in service, and the necessary traveling expenses while traveling under orders; Provided, that officers shall not be enti- tled in any case to draw forage for a greater number of horses, according to grade, than as follows: The major-general, five; the brigadier-general, four; the adjutant and inspec- tor-general, quartermaster-general, commissary-general, and the colonel of engineers, ar- tillery, infantry and cavalry, three each. All lieutenant-colonels, and majors, and cap- tains of the general’s staff, engineer corps, light artillery and cavalry, three each. Lieu- tenants serving in the corps of engineers, lieutenants of light artillery, and of cavalry, two each. No enlisted man in the service of the State shall be employed as aservant by any officer of the army. The monthly pay of the enlisted men of the army of the State shall be as follows: that of sergeant or master workman of the engineer corps, thirty dol- lars; that of corporal or overseer, twenty dollars; privates of the first-class, or artificers, seventeen dollars, and privates of the second class, or laborers and musicians, thirteen dol- lars. The sergeant-major of cavalry, twenty-one dollars; first sergeant, tweaty dollars; sergeants, seventeen dollars; corporals, farriers and blacksmiths, thirteen dollars; music- ians, thirteen dollars, and privates, twelve dollars. Sergeant-major of artillery and in- fantry, twenty-one dollars; first sergeants, twenty dollars each; sergeants, seventeen dol- lars; corporals and artificers, thirteen dollars; musicians, twelve dollars, and privates, eleven dollars each. The non-commissioned officers, artificers, musicians and privates serving in light batteries shall receive the same pay as those of cavalry. Src. 23. Be it further enacted, That each enlisted man of the army of the State shall receive one ration per day, and ayearly allowance of clothing; the quantity and kind of each to be established by regulation of the military and financial board, to be approved by the governor. Rations shall generally be issued in kind, unless under circumstances rendering a commutation necessary. The commutation value of the ration shall be fixed by regulation of the military and financial board to be appointed by the governor. Src. 24. Be it further enacted, That all the officers In the quartermaster’s and com- missary departments shall, previous to entering on the duties of their respective offices, give bonds with good and sufficient security, to the State of Tennessee, in such sum as the military and financial board shall direct, fully to account for all moneys and public prop- erty which they may receive. Neither the quartermaster-general, the commissary-gen- 33 a TL eee —————— Be a pas ae a ean a oe aoe ES mange alee ee We, NaN Seen ae ARS a * aa pe iii Speen Epi ome © eee ge eH ( ett: Haul) RY dy | | at ; if aa) Nea Wed ( aa UMeay ee et ale | } t . ia 4 i | Vig y esa Ely } I TER is iter la) tat nee iia THtib | a ks } {lay irjea 8 j 1 ii vf ‘ fag | ea ‘ay eral Gates 4 ia} A ay ag UTE i ani we ee ane a) edi Rake Vee | ee Hat idee Tia. | Coa pala) ob aah ly) i“ iM Hi Piya ahd | iy Hi teats Gia lite 4 Wi Ata {| rea td i Ad A aT RR aR I OT = —— =e eee cS =4 e : ‘ 5 ee = — Sia ; ees = Sains =m rae : rag 5 = ae a 8 2 = ase a - - : t : sre = : er 7 a fi = ‘ oo ~~ amnaae = Aecmumnmiraentiness.c. | =~ z ~ = Salo meray a Bare = a : x Feat eee oes : sam : : Sach a EAN SE al ecb ecrehsasia ne = RR I aR et TES Sane eter er Me Se HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. eral, nor an other or either of their assistants, shall be concerned, directly or indirectly, in the purchase or sale of any articles intended for, making a part of, or appertaining to pub- lic supplies, except for and on account of the State of Tennessee; nor shall they, or either of them, take or apply to his or their own use, any gain or emolument for negotiating any business in their respective departments other than what is or may be allowed by law. The rules and articles of war established by the laws of the United States of America for the government of the army are hereby declared to be of force, except wherever the words °‘ United States” occur, ‘‘State of Tennessee ’’? shall be substituted therefor; and except that the articles of war numbers sixty-one and sixty-two are hereby abrogated, and the following substituted therefor: ART. 61. Officers having brevets or commissions of a prior date to those of the corps in which they serve, will take place on courts martial or of inquiry, and on boards detailed for military purposes, when composed of different corps, according to the ranks given them in their brevet or former commissions, but in the regiment, corps or company to which such officers belong, they shall do duty and take the rank, both in courts and on boards, as aforesaid, which shall be composed of their own corps, according to the commis- sion by which they are there mustered. Arr. 62. If upon marches, guards or in quarters, different corps shall happen to join or do duty together, the officer highest in rank, according to the commission by which he was mustered in the army, there on duty by orders from competent authority, shall command the whole, and give orders for what is needful for the service, unless otherwise directed by the governor of the State, in orders of special assignment providing for the case. Src. 25. Be it further enacted, That all mounted non-commissioned officers, privates, musicians and artificers shall be allowed forty cents per day for the use and risk of their horses; and if any mounted volunteer shall not keep himself provided with a serviceable horse, such volunteer shall serve on foot. For horses killed in action, or that die from injuries received in the service, or for want of forage, volunteers shall be allowed com- pensation according to their appraised value at the date of mustering into the service. Src. 26. Be it further enacted, That the military board shall procure for the service a supply of the army regulations of the United States, and provide by regulation a badge to designate the grade of officers in the service, and such flags and banners as may be necessary. Src. 27. Beit further enacted, That the pay of volunteers who have been enrolled for service before the passage of this act, if actually mustered into service, shall be counted from the time of their enrollment; and the commanding officer of artillery may appoint recruiting officers to muster into service recruits to be assigned to companies afterward, who shall receive pay and subsistence from time of enrollment. Src. 28. Be it further enacted, That any ten companies, with the requisite number of men, offering themselves in a body, shall be mustered into service as a regiment, may immediately organize by electing their field officers, and be commissioned by the governor. The seniority of captain shall be fixed by the brigadier-general regularly in command; Provided, that in all cases where regiments shall have previously organized and elect- ed their officers, such organization and election may be treated by the governor as good and valid. Sec. 29. Beit further enacted, That each of the members of the military and finan- cial board shall receive compensation at the rate of fifteen hundred dollars per annum. Src. 30. Be it further enacted, That officers of artillery, from colonel to captain inclusive, shall be nominated by the governor and confirmed by the General Assembly. Src. 31. Be it further enacted, That all persons against whom indictments or pre- sentments for misdemeanors may be pending, and who have enlisted under this act in the service of the State, the same may be dismissed in the discretion of the judge before whom the same is pending, as well as for forfeitures against the defendant and his securities.HISTORY OF TENNESSER. SON Srnec. 32. Be it further enacted, That the keeper of the public arms be, and he is hereby directed to make suitable and proper arrangements for the convenience and pro- tection of the arsenal of the State; and that for the expenses incurred for such purposes, the sum of twelve hundred dollars is hereby appropriated, for which the comptroller will issue his warrant upon the treasury, upon the certificate of such keeper, and approved of by the military board. Se, 33. Beit further enacted, That the municipal authorities of all incorporated towns in this State be authorized to borrow money by issuing the bonds of such corpora- tion, or otherwise, for the military defense of such town; and in all cases where corporate authorities of said towns have already issued their bonds for the purpose aforesaid, the same is hereby declared legal and valid. Snc. 34. Be it further enacted, That to enable the county court to carry into effect without delay the provisions of the fourteenth, fifteenth and sixteenth section of this act, the chairman of the county court is empowered to assemble at any time the members of the quarterly court, who, when assembled, shall have all the powers exercised by them at the regular quarterly sessions. Src. 35. Be it further enacted, That the corporate authorities of towns and cities are hereby empowered and authorized to levy a military tax upon personal and real estate, not to exceed the one-half of one per cent, and on privileges not greater than one-half the amount now paid to the State; such money to be raised shall be used for military purposes ander the direction of the authority so levying and collecting the same. Suc. 36. Be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the inspector-general of the State, to be appointed under this act, and such assistants as the governor may appoint to muster into the service of the State of Tennessee each company and regiment after the same are inspected, at such times and places as the governor shall designate, and when said troops are so mustered into the service of the State, they shall be subject to all the rules and articles of war as adopted by this act. Sno. 37. Beit further enacted, That it shall be the duty of each captain upon being mustered into the service to furnish a complete roll of the officers and men in his company to the inspector-general, who shall file one copy of the same in the adjutant-general’s office, and one copy to be delivered to the colonel of each regiment then formed, and it shaJl be the duty of the adjutant-general to furnish blank forms to the captains of com- panies. Sec. 38. Bett further enacted, That the governor, by and with the consent of the military and financial board or bureau, shall be anthorized to purchase and carry on any manufactory or manufactories of gunpowder, which may be deemed necessary for the use of the State, purchase or lease any interest in any lead, saltpetre, or other mines, and work the same for the use of the State, and may also in the name of the State make con- tracts for the manufacture of fire-arms or any other munitions of war, to be manufactured “n the State, and make such advancements in payment for the same as may be deemed advisable to insure the ready and speedy supply thereof for the use of the State. Provided, that when such contract is made or entered into the individual or company making the same shall give bond and security for the repayment thereof, if the arms or other muni- 4ions of war for which such advancement may be made shall not be furnished within the time agreed upon for their delivery, or shall not be of the character contracted for. Src. 39. Be it further enacted, That for the purpose of aiding in supplying the State with arms for the public defense, that the act of January 30, 1861, incorporating the Mem- phis Arms Company, be and the same is hereby confirmed, and the corporators declared to be entitled to exercise all the rights and privileges intended to be given by said act; and it is further enacted, that M. Clusky, John Overton, Robert C. Brinkley, Sam. Mate wvlie ed Wicks, Roberson Topp, William R. Hunt, Fred. W. Smith, J. E. R. Ray, Moses White and Ed. Munford be added to the list of corporators. Sno. 40. Bett further enacted, That the governor and all other authorities having charge of finances in the movement contemplated by this act shall make full reports toHt a Hi f 4 if a at ; BIER ety \ 1! ? cl SH sie ee caine “habereneraaee A = Ses _ eee Seen ee 5ST TE al Si I oY faa Fl eae eee Beka PET PT Grin ta ani ha ae Satna eg ee Oe a a LR A A A ATEN AE ET ea Se — ee FE a re prepe eR IT 528 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. the General Assembly of the State to the amount expended, as well as the various pur: poses for which such expenditures may have been made. Src. 41. Be it further enacted, That this act take effect from and after its passage. W. C. WHITTHORNE, Speaker of the House of Representatives. B. R. STovaut, Speaker of the Senate. Passed May 6, 1861. A true copy. J. E. R. Ray, Secretary of State. On the 7th of May the following message was communicated to the Legislature: EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT, NASHVILLE, May 7, 1861. Gentlemen of the Senate and House of Representatives: By virtue of the authority of your joint resolution, adopted on the ist day of May, inst., [ appointed Gustavus A. Henry, of the county of Montgomery; Archibald W. O. Totten, of the county of Madison, and Washington Barrow, of the county of Davidson, “commissioners on the part of Tennessee, to enter into a military league with the authori- ties of the Confederate States, and with the authorities of such other slave-holding States as may wish to enter into it; having in view the protection and defense of the entire South against the war that is now being carried on against it.’’ The said commissioners met the Hon. Henry W. Hilliard, the accredited representa- tive of the Confederate States, at Nashville, on this day, and have agreed upon and ex- ecuted a military league between the State of Tennessee and the Confederate States of America, subject, however, to the ratification of the two governments, one of the dupli- cate originals of which I herewith transmit for your ratification or rejection. For many cogent and obvious reasons, unnecessary to be rehearsed to you, I respectfully recommend the ratification of this League at the earliest practicable moment. Very Respectfully, IsHaM G. HARRIS. CONVENTION BETWEEN THE STATE OF TENNESSEE AND THE CONFEDERATE-STATES OF AMERICA. The State of Tennessee, looking to a speedy admission into the Confederacy estab- lished by the Confederate States of America, in accordance with the Constitution for the provisional government of said States, enters into the following temporary convention, agreement and military league with the Confederate States, for the purpose of meeting pressing exigencies affecting the common rights, interests and safety of said States and said Confederacy. First, until the said State shall become a member of said Confederacy, according to the constitution of both powers, the whole military force and military oper- ations, offensive and defensive, of said State, in the impending conflict with the United States, shall be under the chief control and direction of the President of the Confederate States, upon the same basis, principles and footing as if said State was now, and during the interval, a member of said Confederacy, said force, together with that of the Confed- erate States, to be employed for the common defense. Second, the State of Tennessee will, upon becoming a member of said Confederacy under the permanent constitution of said Confederate States, if the same shall occur, turn over to said Confederate States all the public property acquired from the United States, on the same terms and in the same manner as the other States of said Confederacy have done in like cases. Third, what- ever expenditures of money, if any, the said State of Tennessee shall make before she becomes a member of said Confederacy, shall be met and provided for by the Confed- erate States. This convention entered into and agreed in the city of Nashville, Tennes- see, on the seventh day of May, A. D. 1861, by Henry W. Hilliard, the duly authorized commissioner to act in the matter of the Confederate States, and Gustavus A. Henry,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 529 Archibald W. O. Totten and Washington Barrow, commissioners duly authorized to act in like manner for the State of Tennessee, the whole subject to the approval and rati- fication of the proper authorities of both governments, respectively. In testimony whereof the parties aforesaid have herewith set their hands and seals, the day and year aforesaid; duplicate originals. [ SEAL. | Henry W. HILuiarp, Commissioner for the Confederate States of America. | SEAL. | Gustavus A. HENRy, [SEAL. ] A. W. O. Totten, [SEAL. | WASHINGTON BARROW, Commissioners on the Part of Tennessee. Immediately upon receiving the report of the commissioners the Legislature passed the following joint resolution: Wuereas, A military league, offensive and defensive, was formed on this the 7th of May, 1861, by and between A. W. O. Totten, Gustavus A. Henry and Washington Barrow, commissioners on the part of the State of Tennessee, and H. W. Hilliard, commissioner on the part of the Confederate States of America, subject to the confirmation of the two governments; Be it therefore resolved by the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, That said league be in all respects ratified and confirmed; and the said General Assembly hereby pledges the faith and honor of the State of Tennessee to the faithful observance of the terms and conditions of said league. The following is the vote in the Senate on the adoption of the league: Ayes: Messrs. Allen, Horn, Hunter, Johnson, Lane, Minnis, McClellan, McNeilly, Payne, Peters, Stanton, Thompson, Wood and Speaker Stovall —14, Nays: Messrs. Boyd, Bradford, Hildreth, Nash, Richardson and Stokes—6. Absent and not voting: Messrs. Bumpass, Mickley, New- man, Stokely and Trimble—». The following is the vote in the House: Ayes: Messrs. Baker, of Perry; Baker, of Weakley; Bayless, Bicknell, Bledsoe, Cheatham, Cow- den, Davidson, Davis, Dudley, Ewing, Farley, Farrelly, Ford, Frazier, Gantt, Guy, Havron, Hurt, Ingram, Jones, Kenner, Kennedy, Lea, Lock- hart, Martin, Mayfield, McCabe, Morphies, Nall, Pickett, Porter, Rich- ardson, Roberts, Sheid, Smith, Sowell, Trevitt, Vaughn, Whitmore, Woods and Speaker Whitthorne—42. Nays: Messrs. Armstrong, Bra- zelton, Butler, Caldwell, Gorman, Greene, Morris, Norman, Russell, Sen- ter, Strewsbury, White, of Davidson; Williams, of Knox; Wisener and Woodward—15. Absent and not voting: Messrs. Barksdale, Beaty, Bennett, Britton, Critz, Doak, East, Gillespie, Harris, Hebb, Johnson, Kineaid, of Anderson; Kincaid, of Claiborne; Trewhitt; White, of Dick- son; Williams, of Franklin; Williams, of Hickman, and Williamson—18. The action of the Legislature in passing the ordinance of secession, in adopting the provisional constitution of the Confederacy, in passing the army bill and in ratifying the league between Tennessee and the Confederate Government, all subject to adoption or rejection by the peo- ple of the State, and all done amid great excitement within a few days, eeEe i a = oe a ae 4 * - ¢ ot ee — ii pieey eae oes Sore : - pa reir OE ee ae vast toe seas ae =<— iii nance nee OO de eS =. - ~ 5 : : Sa = : = 2 : . P 7% : = ae ri = riggers - ‘ ane SS ee norepresasia eal ae Ea, eee Se = eo re oa ae Seeker eaeapinng earealceae Pater cine aid rn ape ee agen ae Fre tc md ES NRA Sy A lg Eel came i Bt a rg ER eS 530 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. : , Lae an met the heartiest and wildest reception from all portions of the State. ; ; 7 1G . Y ‘8 The only opposition encountered was In East Tennessee; but the Govy- ernor. as commander-in-chief of the provisional army, determined to ® occupy that portion of the State immediately with troops in the hope of subjecting it to the Confederate cause. As soon as possible, by virtue ci 2 = iA Rie . of the authority vested in him by the army bill, he made the following ” . a) ~N : : military appointments, all of which were ratified by the General As- sembly: EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT, NASHVILLE, May 9, 1861. Gentlemen of the Senate and House of Representatives: I have nominated and herewith submit for your confirmation the following gentlemen: For major-generals, Gideon J. Pillow, Samuel R. Anderson. For brigadier-generals, Felix K. Zollicoffer, Benjamin F. Cheatham, Robert C. Foster, third; John L. T. Sneed, W. R. Caswell. For adjutant-general, Daniel S. Donelson. For inspector-general, William H. Carroll. For quarter-master general, Vernon K.Stevenson. For commis- sary-general, Rh, G. Fain. For paymaster-general, William Williams. For surgeon- veneral, Dr. Paul F. Eve. For assistant surgeon-generals, Dr. Joseph C. Newnan, Dr. John D. Winston. For assistant adjutant-generals, W. C. Whitthorne, James D. Porter, Jr., Hiram S. Bradford, D. M. Key. For assistant inspector-generals, J. W. Gillespie, James L. Scudder, John C. Brown, Alexander W. Campbell. For assistant quartermas- ter-generals, Paulding Anderson, George W. Cunningham, Samuel T. Bicknell, George W. Fisher, Thomas L. Marshall, Thomas Peters, John G. Finnie, W. P. Davis, J. H. Mc- Mahon. For assistant commissary-generals, Calvin M. Fackler, John L. Brown, Miles Draughn, Madison Stratton, James 8. Patton, W. W. Guy, P. T. Glass. For assistant paymaster-generals, Claiborne Deloach, William B. Reese, Jr., Thomas Boyers. For lieutenant-colonel of artillery, John P. McCown. For military and financial board, Neill S. Brown, James E. Bailey, William G. Harding. By reference to your act of the 6th of May, and the army regulations, it will be seen that there are additional nominations yet to be submitted, the number of which it is im- possible for me to determine until it is ascertained, with at least some degree of certainty, the number of troops that it may be necessary to call into active service. I have, there- fore, nominated the heads of departments with such assistants as I considered necessary to the work of immediate organization, leaving the developments of the future to deter- mine the additional appointments it may be proper to make. Very Respectfully, IsHam G. HARRIS. Later the following appointments were made: Gentlemen of the Senate and House of Representatives: Under the act of the General Assembly of the 6th of May, 1861, I have made the fol- lowing nominations for the consideration and confirmation of the General Assembly, to wit: On the 10th instant—Dr. B. W. Avent, surgeon-general, vice Dr. Paul F. Eve, re- signed. On the 10th instant—For surgeon of Col. Preston Smith’s regiment, Dr. Emmett Woodward and Dr. Richard Butt, assistant-surgeon. On the 15th instant—For surgeon of Col. J. Knox Walker’s regiment, Dr. James D. Lindsay. On the 17th instant—For surgeon of Col. George Maney’s regiment, Dr. William Nichol and J. R. Buist, assistant- surgeon. On the 17th instant—For surgeon of Col. John C. Brown’s regiment, Dr. Samuel H. Stout. On the 18th instant—For captains of the artillery corps, Arthur N. Rutledge, Marshall T. Polk, William H. Jackson, Andrew Jackson, Jr. On the 17th in- stant—Reuben Ross, James H. Wilson, Smith P. Bankhead, Robert M. Russell. On the 7th instant—For colonel commandant of the artillery corps, John P. McCown. ForHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. oil Jieutenant-colonel, Milton A. Haynes. For major, Alexander P. Stewart. On the 15th instant—For captain of ordnance, Moses H Wright. On the 16th instant—For assistant adjutant-generals, Pallok B. Lee and Adolphus Hieman. On the 15th instant—For as- sistant inspector-general, Henry Wall, vice John C. Brown, declined, Jo. G. Pickett and CG. H. Williams. On the 16th instant—For major of engineer corps, B. R. Johnson. For the captains of said corps, W. D. Pickett, Montgomery Lynch and W. A. Forbes On the 16th instant—For assistant quartermaster-general, Jesse B. Clements, vice Paul- ding Anderson, declined, John L. Sehon, E. Foster Cheatham, James Glover, John VW. Eldridge, A. J. Vaughn, John © Bransford, John S. Hill, A. L. McClellan, Nathan Adams. H. T. Massengale, John W. Gorham, Frank M. Paul, S. H. Whitthorne. On the {7th in- stant—For assistant commissary-generals, Frank W. Green, John R. Wood, Daniel P. Cocke, John’ W. Crisp, O. B. Caldwell, Lee M. Gardner, William C. Bryan, Jerome Rid- ley, William H. Stover, R. H. Williamson, John D. Allen, Albert G. Eiring, G. W. Me- nees, Samuel E. Barbee. The rank of the various appointees will be determined upon the issuance of commissions, after confirmation by the General Assembly. In the meantime they will enter upon the duties of their respective positions as they may be ordered to do by their superior officers. In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the [ites] ereat seal of the State to be affixed at the department at Nashville, this the 18th of May, 1861. IsHamM G. HARRIS. By the Governor: J. E.R. Ray, Secretary of State. After the passage of the army bill the formation and thorough discipline of regiments for the field rapidly took place. Memphis and Nashville became stirring military centers. Every county seat was a camp. Almost every pursuit was dropped except the popular art of making war. Asa result great progress was made, and soon more than the number of volunteers called tor were ready, and as fast as they could be supplied with arms were mustered into the provisional army of Ten- nessee. Herculean efforts were made to supply the regiments as fast as possible with arms, and calls were issued by the authorities for guns ot any description that eould be used with effect—shot-guns, flint-lock and ‘rel and bear guns, pistols, ote. On the 18th of percussion rifles, squiz June the Legislature acain met, pursuant, to the call of the Governor, s S » | ing to the difficulty of con- who, in his message, recommended that, ow verting the bonds ordered issued under the army bill of May 6 into money, three-fifths ($3,000,000) of the amount ($5,000,000) should be of an equivalent amount of such bonds: that the interest on the internal improvement bonds of the State, pay- able in New York, should be made payable at Nashville; Charleston or New Orleans; and that all necessary legislation to regulate the currency of the State should be made. He also submitted a statement of the 1g the State in an attitude of defense. Twenty- ere in the field; ten enough cavalry issued in treasury notes in heu progress made in placir one regiments of infantry had been organized and w artillery companies were in progress of completion ; companies to form a regiment were also well advanced, and an engineers Ys ies l } HH} iti} t iT ale | } i (iit } ) i WH tie ee . Nk (4 \ i At Hi rit | Wi heal ANAS Mi i th { Mee ip | Wie ' i! (then | i MAN ARIEEES En (| | Hi 1 | | hs . UTS aiake alas) cay ei ned it uaty } | } diy | 1 it t ih } a ee tk LI iF Hi} , \ 1) i) ie ; batt ie | i} i lyin oa) ' } ti ' hi } hh hile: Hi in Ht i} if hal Hn ya nn Hai Hi Hi . iti 4 : We HI | nih | i ') tH i bil it} yA Rie Wt WlROBE Al a { RR Ee SE nat BIR ET Bye ea Mt $ on ai Ma e i iy H ny a i Riis eet A it | SE GREE i Ht 2 ae pangs — ~ a verre SE TT ae - LS - > > am a en ee nec tn os sigan sm nel ea = ey apie ee a : — os a a Sipe 5 > pinnae came dln i em econ i i eine Se ae 532 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. corps was nearly ready for service. Besides these three regiments from the State were with the Confederate Army in Virginia, and a small squad was with the army at Pensacola. In addition, many of the militia regi- ments were as ready for the field as several which had been accepted and mustered in. In accordance with the provisions of the act of May 6 an election was held throughout the State June 8, for the people to decide upon the question of secession or separation, and the question of representation in the Confederate States Congress, and the adoption of the provisional It was well assured at the start that both “separation” and ‘‘representation”’ would carry by hand- constitution of the Confederate Government. some majorities, and this assurance was well sustained as the returns began to come in. The following proclamation by the Governor officially announced the result: PROCLAMATION. To all whom these Presents shall come— Greeting: WHEREAS, By an act of the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, passed on the 6th of May, 1861, an election on the 8th of June, 1861, was held in the several counties of the State in accordance therewith, upon the Ordinance of Separation and Representa- tion; and also, whereas, it appears from the official returns of said election (hereto ap- pended) that the people of the State of Tennessee have in their sovereign will and capac- ity, by an overwhelming majority. cast their votes for ‘Separation,’ dissolving all political connection with the late United States Government, and adopted the provisional government of the Confederate States of America: Now, therefore, I, Isham G. Harris, governor of the State of Tennesse, do ‘““make it Known and declare all connection of the State of Tennessee with the Federal Union dis. solved, and that Tennessee is a free, independent government, free from all obligation to, or connection with, the Federal Government of the United States of America. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the [L.s. ] great seal of the State to be affixed at the department in Nashville, on this, the 24th day of June, A. D., 1861. IsHAM G. HarRIs. By the Governor: J. E. R. Ray, Secretary of State. OFFICIAL ELECTION RETURNS. EAST TENNESSEE. = ——— $$$ — = $$$ ————_—_— le | Separa- | Repre- COUNTIES. | tion. jsentat’n. Sa Reon ANGerSON ere 6. 5, 97 | OG 127 1,278 leds OC re ee 197 186 500 455 Bradley; >.2. . 507 0090 | 1,882 | 1,380 BOUIN erin 3. oon: tewiewdecs ci 418 414 | 1,766 | 1,768 Campbell ERE eee sete iae) eve sets fel) ie Giais Wie cess ee 59 60 | 1,000 | 1,000 Oana tee ees ele. oseki scl | 86 | 86 | 1,348 | 1,343 @laibornen fen 6 cree 250 | 246 | 1,243 | 1,247 Cocke Seah Ser celts taler ees stl averse cca seo ieee eo sc, 518 | 517 | 1,185 | 1,185 Grainger .... sty dott cy nr oe 086 | 582 | 1,492 | 1,489 Gee ee co | 744 | 738 | 2,691 | 2,702 PlamulCOn meee eRe se cc ee | 854 | 837 | 1,260 | 1,97 a SS et agrees [ROD Os oc oomenee Newlel< ccss RTE VNe ae ee yin Washington..........-.. MotalSe. se asec HISTORY OF TENNESSEE, 33d wicgiwie elel.e 0) 0 41.0 0) e141 0: 6) 6\¢ 0)10; 61 ©) 6.0128 0) \6 0 eel ele ¢) © @ (8°65 4) 6 215 10,0) 0.0 (010 (0.6) 9) ¢ 89/0) 2 ne ee) ©. 6) 010) 8 8 eo» © 0101e 6 op 2 0 910 eceourveeoeaereeoaoevenee Se uhaie 1eey 6110) 0) 0 ©. 0).¢ »..0\0) B68 (6.0/0) .¢ (eee. 6! 9 clea a ele ae ee) a0 (010).0 9 .e1: 18: 8) 14/0 7890), 019/18)07)° Bedford .... WanNNON... <<< Cheatham.... WORECCE= 3... Davidson..... DeKalb.... Dickson...... ee DANES go donaado Franklin... AGES ess GRUNGYS. 2.2. + igleyrolin | casn6ac Hickman ..... Humphreys... . ro Be SO TR en os een ee ofcie onic cicns © civinieisis AM ECTICO ME ee ene ce el csreieee sere score): er So are elsle oiciere o cleie eieie ele) eieie vious ieee! eis LATO bbe 04550555 Macone.. 3... NInMeTeA Ieee IWS os 35: 31-10) Montgomery.... Overton’. < «cc. «ch PTTL OTe etoile soles 1G seins) os i eininla sei cle orci Pera He TROL ees a ee os ie cn ielcss «elise evelinintershes oni cic Re ree os cme ere cole ere ornare cine stetesee © eis: siel'e) sh Stewart........ POLI CTA 4 cas 6 WAN PISTON: cc. .s+ 0 cs «6 ee ee ce ae VIR CTM ere tstaie) sicievere ore less eKeieliniorcin scl) njorcin aioe cnn oiese WWiatyMels,5 cs: =»). IV VINNY LOE ws croc exeieseue a'aetel ovate Williamson: ...... «. AVEO Gaconee MIDDLE TENNESSEE. MOtt S25 Sissi ace aie ele 6 0) ¢ 6 s)8 60 6 Bee 130 Separa- | Repre- m@ {tL WH tion. (sentat’n.| Sep’n. | Rep’n ~ > ry 9¢ or 2 fe a 630 | 63 908 603 111 1,226 904 414 481 1,096 D0 738 19 158 | 360 454. | 60 1,586 | 1,576 | 1,022 | 886 | O97 111 1,214 892 413 478 1,089 00 Tol 19 1ol 336 436 1,460 1,987 737 ,196 , 144 600 267 TT 630 ol7 oe 100 202 et OD 1,568 60 | 1,528 627 1,016 | 1,445 Separa- tion. 1,595 1,149 702 1,276 5,635 833 1,141 128 1,652 2,458 528 498 1,400 1,042 1,483 1,124 223 2,912 447 1,642 2,731 2,631 1,471 3,839 2,392 1,249 1,839 6,465 308 1,419 409 1,370 1,945 2.329 . . ‘58,265 5 14,780 | 14,601 Repre- sentat’n. 1,544 1,145 697 1,268 D,012 823 1,138 120 1,650 2,464 528 493 1,400 1,042 1,480 1,122 216 2,892 446 1,628 2,693 2,630 1,471 3,839 2,377 1,247 1,839 6,441 308 1,400 361 1,367 1,918 2,298 7,858 No Sep’n. 727 127 D0 26 402 642 no lA 651 0 1i 353 8,298 , 132,923 32,962 No | Rep’n. 737 118 59 28 29 365 93 7d 73 82 13 19 908 | 121 30 361 8,298. —ee ee a a le : ee a Pe A a Ene aS oe Sa at ie ma Ei yt lh ‘i 4 Vi b (fat Bi 5 eu a Wey tent!) We (meget ive i vi Ha > ; * ti Lee ai i ie et WE A Fe | : co. “Ee : 1] ee hal ted + BY) Caines aniline i ile Healy Wee Hi ral ‘ ae teh i Hk edi Ae a AD a Ee Ea nn A Toe AM a Se ee aR eranga roman STs uss = = a ee ee = a Sr er cg a a lt IN IO HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. WEST TENNESSEE. es oe ap Separa- | Repre- | No | No COUNTIES. tion. | Sentat’n.| Sep’n. | Rep’n. : 798 796 228 226 Ca 967 | 952 | 1,349 | 1,351 Decatur..... Re Gi cic ces aie ale LO 293 550 | 537 Wyn ese ste tees 4] ili On GH eet35 FOLIO he oct oe cst aera e ese er 1,364 | 1,364 | - 23 | 28 Gibson .. ne 1,999 | 1,954 | 286 | 219 Elardeman® on. 5. <1 1,526 | 1,508 29 | 50 HIG EKOOG Ls oo on Dogo dong00oHOr 930 924 139)3) 143 Henderson...... 801 790 | 1,018 | 1,013 Wennye (ks. 1,746 | 1,734 | 317 | 317 DRAUICLCTO lO ee ereicle cols toie evieiers 163 799 ae | : 0 IVTOIN RIG eee ee ee oe ele els aoe: 1,318 | 1,365 | 586 | 591 MadISOUM se ccc We Oe ee Oe Cee cians | 2.704 | 2,751 | 20 | 21 Obiony 2,996 | 2,957 | 64| 88 Rernyeree oe 780 | 779 | 168) 169 Sie D ya ees see ince Sec c oe elie sete: 7,182 | 7,127 | 5 5 TR LOLI yo eee eee lesie ei dc 943 941° |) 16 18 | 1,189 | 1,201 | 1,200 WWGRISIEN/s 5 6.0906080 900000 0000C MOtalSi ee oe Campy Daviss Vides s.s-' Camp Duncan, Tenn... Harper’s Ferry, Va.... Kort Pickens; Pla..;..... Oni arrisnehenny se ctcecin cl ny): Camp De Soto, Tenn......... Hermitage Camp, Va... Camp Jackson, Viana... -- Fort Randolph, Tenn.*..... otalia 3... .. - *Reported. err ee | 1,189 (29,127 |28,962 | Separa- _.....| 6.389 | 6,839 | AGGREGATES. DIVISIONS. Separa- tion. __. | 85598 | 8,598 Repre- No | No Rep’n. Sep’n. CAMPS. tion. | sentat’n. Soccer 506 506 see ul 111 “| oto o7d eee eer eke cetera a cleft oie) eneietenere [eal 737 ee eel 1DOEp al 09 eine 15 18 be | ie| i 622 622 Repre- | sentation. Hast lhennessee.-... .<..<- Middle Tennessee....... West Tennessee..:...-. Military Camps........ Maj ORI GICSH ne ee 14,780 58,265 29,127 6,339 14,601 | 57,858 | 28,962 | 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 | 00 | | 00 00 00 cee oO 00 No Rep’n. _No Sep’n. 32.923 | 32,962 8,298 | 6,117 | 0,000 | 8,298 6,114 0,000 108,511 47,338 ol COLL: 6,339 | 107,760 | 47,374 | } 47,888 | 47,374 The Confederate Congress had, May 17, anticipated the action ot Tennessee in separating herself from the Federal Government, and had, rit rem ycHISTORY- OF TENNESSEE. before adjournment, and before the result of the election of June 8 be- came known, passed the following act: An Act TO ADMIT THE SpaTE OF TENNESSEE INTO THE CONFEDERACY, ON A CERTAIN CONDITION. The State of Tennessee hav the United States, and to becoming, in the future, a mem measures may not be consummated before the approaching recess of Congress; therefore, The Congress of the Confederate States of America do enact, That the State of Tennes- admitted a member of the Confederate States of America, upon an equal foot- r the provisional government of the ing adopted measures looking to an early withdrawal from ber of this Confederacy, which see shall be ing with the other States, under the constitution fo same, upon the condition that the said constitution for the provisional government of the Confederate States shall be adopted and ratified by the properly and legally consti- tuted authorities of said State, and the governor of said State shall transmit to the Presi- dent of the Confederate States, before the reassembling of Congress after the recess aforesaid, an authentic copy of the proceedings touching said adoption and ratification by said State of said provisional constitution; upon the receipt whereof, the President, by any further proceeding proclamation, shall announce the fact, whereupon and without on the part of Congress, the admission of said State of Tennessce into the Confederacy, under said Constitution for the provisional government of the Confederate States, shall be considered as complete; and the laws of this Confederacy shall be thereby extended over as fully and completely as over the States now composing the same. HOWELL COBB, President of the Congress. said State Approved May 1%, 1861. JEFFERSON DAVIS. The following was the provisional government of the Confederate States of America: Jefferson Davis, of Mississipp1, president ; Alex- ander H. Stephens, of Georgia, vice-president. Cabinet Officers: Robert Toombs, of Georgia, secretary of state; CG. G. Memminger, of South Carolina, secretary of the treasury ; L. P. Walker, of Alabama, secretary of war; S. B. Mallory, of Florida, secretary of navy; J. H. Reagan, of Texas, postmaster-general ; J. P. Benjamin, of Louisiana, attorney- general. Congress: Hon. Howell Cobb, ‘of Georgia, president ; J Oe Hooper, of Alabama, secretary. Standing Committees: Executive De- partment—Stephens, Conrad, Boyce, Shorter, Brooke; . Foreign Affairs— Rhett, Nisbet, Perkins, Walker, Keitt; Military Affairs—Bartow, Miles, Sparrow, Kenan, Anderson; Naval Affairs—Conrad, Chestnut, Smith, Wright, Owens; Finance—Toombs, Barnwell, Kenner, Barry, McRae; Commerce—Memminger, Crawford, DeClouet, Morton, Curry; Judiciary. Withers, Hale, Cobb, Harris; Postal—Chilton, Boyce, Hill, Hill. Kenner; Territo- arne; Public Lands— —Clayton, Harris, Curry; Patents—Brooke, Wilson, Lewis, ries——Chestnut, Campbell, Marshall, Nisbet, Fe Marshall, Harris, Fearne; Indian Affairs—Morton, Hale, Sparrow, Lewis, Keitt; Printing—Cobb, Harris, Miles, Chilton, Perkins; Accounts— Owens, Crawford, Campbell, DeClouet, Smith; Engrossment—Shorter, Wilson, Kenan, McRae, Bartow. The ratification of the governor's military appointments , had no sensoST ee, ee oe ee Se Te ae ale elite et 2 ee chet nn Ea et mdm Sh ea alc i tir moe a ih aptphinr te ee oe epee 536 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. sooner been made by the Legislature than the assignment of officers to their commands was officially announced. Prior to this, on the 25th of April, Gov. Harris had directed Gen. S. R. Anderson to proceed to Memphis to organize the various volunteer forces at that point and throughout West Tennessee. He remained at Memphis, engaged in active and valuable military work, until about May 3, when he trans- ferred the completion of the organizations there to Gen. J. L. T. Sneed and returned to Nashville. On the 3d of May ten companies at Nash- ville were mustered into the State service and became the First Tennessee Regiment, commanded by Col. George Maney. About the same time another regiment, which became the First Confederate Tennessee, was organized at Winchester, with Peter Turney, colonel. By the 5th of the same month 171 companies had reported themselves ready for the field to the adjutant-general. On the 9th of May Gov. Harris appointed his staff as follows: James W. McHenry, adjutant-general; David R. Smith, quartermaster-general; John H. Crozier, inspector-general; John YV. Wright, first aide-de-camp; Preston Smith, second aide-de-camp ; Gideon J. Pillow, senior major-general, was placed in command of the provisional army of the State, with headquarters at Memphis. Samuel R. Anderson, junior major-general, was assigned to the command of the Department of Middle Tennessee, with headquarters at Nashville, and, May 14, appointed William A. Quarles and Granville P. Smith his aides- de-camp and W. C. Whitthorne, his assistant adjutant-general. On the 17th Brig.-Gen. R. ©. Foster, by order of Gen. Anderson, took command of the forces at Camp Cheatham, Robertson County, and about the same time Brig.-Gen. F. K. Zollicoffer was assigned to the command of the militia at Camp Trousdale, Sumner County, and Brig.-Gen. W. R. Caswell to the command of the forces of Kast Tennessee with head- quarters at Knoxville. Gen. B. F. Cheatham was assigned to command at Union City, and Gen. John L. T. Sneed at Randolph. The military and financial board appointed by the governor under the army bill consisted of Neill S. Brown, William G. Harding and James E. Bailey. Gov. Harris was ex-officio a member of this board. The members were appointed immediately after the passage of the army bill, and soon had established in active working order all the military departments created by that instrument. Although no formal call was issued by the gover- nor for troops until June 21, the rapid mustering of militia for the pro- visional army and the concentration at important points -and along the northern boundary of the State, were steadily, yet informally, pursued by virtue of the popular belief that the State was in imminent danger of invasion. May 19 the Nashville Patriot stated that up to that date aboutHISTORY OF TENNESSEBR. D3 Gs 25.000 volunteers had been tendered the governor. On the 20th of May Gen. Pillow at Memphis ordered reprisals taken of Northern prop- erty passing that city on the river, railroads or otherwise, and required all vessels and shipments to be examined with the view of ascertaining the ownership of cargoes, ete. About May 22 Gen. Zollicoffer succeeded in securing, via Chattanooga, several thousand stands of arms from the Confederate Government. Two days later news was received at Mem- phis that 15,000 Federal troops were on the eve of departing down the river from Cairo to capture and sack the former city, which report occasioned great bustle and excitement. By the 25th of May about 17,000 stands of arms had been received by the State authorities from the Confederate Government. Three days later several six-pound cannons, which had been manufactured by Ellis & Moore, Nashville, were tested and found serviceable. By the 29th there were encamped at Knoxville between twenty-five and thirty companies, and from them Col. Church- well’s regiment had been organized. Hight or ten companies had been rendezvoused at Chattanooga and vicinity and were encamped there ready for service. Late in May the county court at Memphis appropri- ated $12 for the wife and $6 for each child, per month, of each volunteer who should enter the Confederate service. At this: time Whitfield, Bradley & Co., of Clarksville, were making serviceable cannon. At the election of June 8 Tennessee troops to the number of 737 polled their votes for “separation” at Pensacola, Fla. Barly in June much had been done with the means at hand, to place the State in an attitude of defense. Five or six batteries were posted along the Mississippi River, from Memphis to the Kentucky line, commanding the leading strategic points, and consisting of mortars, columbiads and twenty- four and thirty-two pounders, and were manned by a carps of ten fairly well organized companies of ‘Tennessee artillery, under the command of Cols. J. P. McCown and M. A. Haynes. About 15,000 volunteers were concentrated at Memphis, Jackson and other principal points in West Tennessee, and were under the command of Maj.-Gen. Gideon J. Pillow, of the provisional army. Considerable action had been taken to pre- pare defenses along or near the northern boundary of the State, to be in readiness for any invasion from the North. The importance of construct- ing fortifications along the Tennessee and the Cumberland Rivers, as well as along the Mississippi, had been seriously considered, and energetic steps had been taken in that direction. The concentration of Federal forces at Cairo, IIl., late in April, had aroused the apprehension of the authorities of the State and of the Confederate Government, that an ad- vance of the enemy was contemplated down the Mississipp1, and doubt- ae eae naanEs << hate = = SRT Sy ee ee a es 538 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. lessly up the Tennessee and the Cumberland Rivers. It was deemed im- portant to have the militia in such a state of readiness that it could be ealled into the field at a moment’s warning, and Gov. Harris, June 21, issued General Order, No. 1, to that effect. June 3 Gen. Anderson, in command of the Department of Middle ‘Tennessee, called for 2,000 rifle- men, the companies to furnish their own rifles, and for five companies of cavalry, all to furnish their own double-barreled shot-guns. June 1 the Confederate law which prohibited the exportation of cotton, except through Southern ports, came into operation, and Gen. Pillow, commander at Memphis, ordered that none should be sent North through Tennessee or out of Tennessee. Pursuant to the provisions of the army bill, home guards were organized, and a committee of safety appointed in al- most every county of the State. Early in June the city authorities of Memphis had, at their own expense, purchased commissary, quarter- master and ordnance stores and armament for fortifications along the Mississippi, and an agent was appointed by the Legislature to settle with them for such expense. The strategic importance of the location of Mem- phis was early recognized by the authorities of that city, who received great praise for their prompt action to secure control of the Mississippi. Karly in June a force of about 8,000 Mississippians, under the command of Maj.-Gen. Clark, passed northward through West Tennessee, to co- operate with the latter State against the threatened advance southward of the Federals from Cairo. On the 27th of June the military bill was amended. The bonds to be issued under the act of May 6, were exempted from taxation, and fur- ther an ample provision was made for the organization, equipment and discipline of volunteers and militia. Provision was made for the support of the families of such volunteers as should become insane in the service ; and all moneys or property owing by citizeas of the State to citizensof any non-slave-holding State were declared non-collectable during hostil- ities between Tennessee and the Federal Government; that such moneys could be paid into the State treasury and upon the cessation of hostilities should be refunded with interest. It was enacted, June 27, that treasury notes to the amount of $3,000,000, in whole or in part, in lieu of the $3,000,000 of the bonds authorized to be issued under the act of May 6, should be circulated, and that such notes should bear interest not to ex- ceed 6 per centum. July 1, it was made lawful for the banks of the State to receive and pay out the treasury notes of the Confederate Government, and State officers were required to receive such notes in payment of money due the State. Banks were required to increase their circulation. to withold dividends due stockholders in non-slave-holding States while theHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. a9 war continued; and it was made unlawful to pay either interest or principa! of the bonds of the State held by citizens in non-slave-holding States un- til the war should cease, or for bank officers to remove the assets of stockholders of non-slave-holding States from Tennessee. ‘These provis- ‘ons were deemed necessary in view of the probable future scarcity ol money to carry on civil and military affairs. The authorities were not unmindful of the trials and tribulations of their Revolutionary fathers, and made care- ful estimates of chances to carry the State sately through the storm of war. June 28 it was enacted that the authorities of Giles County might assess and collect a tax for the manufacture of fire-arms, gunpowder and other munitions of war. June 28 the inspector of the State penitentiary was authorized to borrow of the State bank $10,000, to be used in the purchase of material for making shoes, hats and army accoutrements. June 29 it was “resolved by the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee that the governor be authorized and requested to place at the disposal of the Confederate States the volunteer forces of the State of Tennessee, the same to be mustered to the service of said States subject to the rules and regulations adopted by the Confederate authorities for the govern- ment of the Confederate Army ; and that in making the arrangements therefore we shall have in view the placing of the defense of the State under the immediate control an ddirection of the President of the Con- federate States.” Within a few weeks after the formation of militia companies had commenced, the women of the State organized in all the leading cities to secure contributions of all kinds of supplies for camp, field and hospital. By the 19th of June the society at Nashville, comprising 231 ladies, had eollected and sent to camp 4,745 pieces of wearing apparel, ete. Organ- ‘zations at Memphis had done nearly as well. During the early months of the war the societies were often. reorganized, and the result of their la- bors was highly appreciated by the sweltering militia in the various hot and uncomfortable camps. August 12 the State Soldier’s Aid Society was formed at Nashville, with branches throughout Middle Tennesseece. From that date until October 1 the society sent to the various camps over fifty large boxes of supplies of all descriptions, and collected in cash $1,834.20. Nashville, Clarksville, Franklin, Pulaski, Columbia, Mur- freesboro, Springfield, Harpeth and other cities donated the money and supplies. Mrs. FE. G. Porter, of Nashville, was president of the State Society. A flourishing society at Memphis accomplished almost as much good as the one at Nashville. August 22 Gov. Harris issued a procla- mation to the women of the State to permanently organize for the cold plying the societies in all weather, which had the happy effect of multi Serene ean nent ae en a — se = aee a atl ; . ETT Pa es " a = - 7 RR a LE MS I ieee I a Sees z rE ; a nes i SS ES ce sani ee oe x aa eske cdi Sasha gpl eeatadins ap are ee - en ae pe en . = ee _ nan remer.es - : ae sana ae = - > - or eae ina ee sek rg . _ ees ae et SI A la ee ias i eee yp a : : = i: ae E * x ; . aS A Tae Tay Sy = a RE aa Heiman commanding the troops at Fort Henry on the Tenne an order to seize all property of the Nort] 540 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. directions and supplying necessities to many a poor soldier boy during the cold winter of 1861-62. On the 6th of July Goy. Harris issued a proclamation calling for 3,000 volunteers to meet the requisition of the Confederate Government on the State of Tennessee. About the middle of J uly, pursuant to the offer of the Tennessee Legislature, the Confederate Government accepted the transfer of the provisional army of Tennessee to the Confederacy, and issued directions to have the troops received and mustered in. About this time Gens. Gideon J. Pillow, S. R. Anderson and D. S Donelson were commissioned brigadier-generals in the Confederate States Army. July 12 Dr. 8S. McKissack, of Maury County, bought $3,000 worth of Confederate Government bonds at par, the first purchase made in the State. Gens. B. F. Cheatham and F. K. Zollicoffer were commissioned brigadier-generals of the Confederate States Army about the 20th of July. About this time Gen. S. R. Anderson succeeded Gen. Caswell in command of the Confederate forces in East Tennessee. (Col. Jo Pickett was his chief of staff. The following is the report of the military and financial board to Gov. Harris, bearing date July 18, 1861: Quartermaster-general’s department....... sieleeiaih os POLO MD 94 Commissary-seneralis department-s5.. 4.5500. 2c ee eee 022,456 03 Paymaster-feneralis;departmentse. 434-56 ees. s oe eee 399,600 00 Medical department....... 8,500 00 Ordnancesdepartmenterrre pase ee . 362,045 91 Contingencies scent oe eee ot cs Sac 12,518 03 MO taser eee tric. dtm les oe nae cos Cocco $2,223,890 91 July 26 Gen. Pillow left Memphis with part of the troops designed for the contemplated campaign northward, moving to Randolph, thence to New Madrid, Mo., where he was joined by Gen. Cheatham with a force from Union City. On the 31st of July Gov. Harris issued a gen- eral order that the officers of the provisional army should muster their command for the inspection of representative military men of the Con- federacy authorized to effect the transfer of the troops, and should pre- pare revised rolls of their companies and regiments to be handed to the Confederate inspector, which acts would operate as a transfer of the State forces to the Southern army. By the 7th of August the transfer was completed. This almost stripped the State of its defensive army, whereupon Goy. Harris issued a eall for 30,000 volunteers to serve as a ‘“Reserve Corps of Tennessee.” On the Ist of August the State voted . on the question of the adoption of the permanent constitution of the Confederacy and gaye a majority of about 30,000 in its favor. Col. ssee, issued 1 passing down the river. Au-BATTLE OF SHILOH, April 6, 1862. = One Mile N OFinth C to Co). Ss" y 4 i) { «¢ Ly pleat 2 Cotton Press (0, . \ 1c ee f G&. Se ; Y A NE j i? OS ¢ \ a ‘py Sf J : Sa, LQ ) \ ~ Va Se) . ~ > ‘Hornet's Nest i Tardee’s Corps ~~ [> o> ; Hardee's Prentiss Ni Yor ' rps Captured ~~ \ a Mey petachn, NEY ; ep POSITIONS WH LATE ON THE EVENING yt) N OF THE 6TH. )]| Peel (Sy AY // owl gpl iS X || | Artillery Fi re) ke / | | 2 HG Ee K US Re \es a ed -_HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. yA cust 1 Gov. Harris was re-elected over his Union competitor, W. H. Polk, of East Tennessee, by a majority of about 30,000. August 22 Gen. Foster, who had succeeded Gen. Anderson in command of the post at Nashville, ordered that thereafter no person would be permitted to leave Tennessee without a passport. About this time there were several bloody encounters in East Tennessee between Federal and Confederate residents. About the middle of September Gen. Foster resigned his command at Nashville. At this time, also, the Confederate Government called upon Tennessee for 30,000 volunteers. During the summer and autumn of 1861 great advancement was made in mustering regiments for the field and in preparing arms, ord- nance and equipments. By the 17th of July the factories at Nashville were manufacturing 100,000 percussion caps daily, and two foundries at Memphis were molding strong and serviceable cannons. A little later muskets and cannons, shot and shell, saddles and harness, knapsacks, etc., were manufactured in considerable quantity at Nashville. There were cannon factories at Memphis, Clarksville, Murfreesboro, Lebanon, Pulas- ki, Shelbyville, Franklin and elsewhere, and small-arm factories on a limited scale were scattered throughout the State. The Governor’s mes- sage to the Legislature October 7, 1861, summed up the military record of the State: In about two months 80.000 volunteers had been placed on the field, many having been declined; the provisional army had been transferred, July 31, to the Confederacy; a total ot thirty-eight regiments of infantry, seven battalions of cavalry and sixteen artillery companies had been raised; all supplies necessary had been furnished by the “‘Mil- tary and Financial Board,” despite the blockade of the Southern ports and the almost utter lack of sources of supplies at home; factories had been so encouraged that by the Ist of October 250 guns were made weekly in the State and 1,300,000 percussion caps; and lead and powder com- panies, particularly the latter, had done a creditable part in preparing the State for war. The Governor submitted the following report of military expenses prior to October 1: Quartermaster-general’s department. ......20---++s7-2°°* $1,657,706 60 Commissary-general’s department....-.--++-+sssresr srr 627,064 87 Paymaster-general’s Gepantmente seca cml omes enc 1,104,800 00 Medical department......-. 24,761 21 @rdnancevdepartment 1) secen een cr. ecco cn cin ae 990,291 20 ecruitin ose hviceee sec artery ea anaes 723 29 Advance on gun, saltpeter and powder contracts, etc...--- 456,826 08 Advance to Gen. Pillow for the Missouri campaign...-.--- 200,000 00 Serco 31,850 59 Contingent expense..... ——$—$—$——— $5,094,023 80 34 14} i Senawe i vane anal ee ee —— SSS ee TT = Na hat a ea Ey Shakaoaetas 2 A Ga SS ES I ~ Nahe at ee eee ee RS era RT RNEASY i 542. HISTORY OF TENNESSEE, All army supplies had been transferred to the Confederate Govern- ment, which assumed the payment of all Tennessee military obligations. Property had depreciated to such an extent as to make it appear neces- sary to raise the rate of taxation, which was accordingly done. In No- vember strong Union forces began to concentrate at Elizabethton, near Bristol, and at Strawberry Plains in East Tennessee, and several skir- mishes occurred. On the 19th of November the Governor issued a procla- mation declaring that there was great danger of an invasion of the State by the Federal forces and calling out the ‘““Reserve Corps” for service in the field. This was in response to the request of Gen. Albert Sidney Johnston, Confederate commander of the Department of Tennessee, whose headquarters were at Memphis, and whose clear discernment of strategic art detected the coming advance of the Federals down the Mississippi and up the Tennessee and the Cumberland Rivers. At this time great difficulty was experienced by the Confederate Government in furnishing its troops with arms. ‘The Governor, though hereulean exertions had been made, found it impossible to arm the ‘“Reserve Corps,” and accord- ingly, November 2, issued an appeal to the citizens of the State to de- liver to their county clerks ‘‘every effective double-barreled shot-gun and sporting rifle which they may have, to be immediately shipped to the arsenal at Nashville, Knoxville or Memphis, where the same will be val- ued by a competent ordnance officer and the value paid to the owner by the Confederate Government. J urge you to give me your aid in the im- portant work of arming our troops, with which we can repel the inva- ders; but if you refuse prepare to take the field, for I am resolved to ex- haust all resources before the foot of the invader shall pollute the soil of Tennessee.” But although almost every citizen possessed a fire-arm of some kind, many hesitated, in view of probable personal needs of defense at home within a short time, to transfer their guns,and large numbers did not. During the summer and autumn of 1861 it became apparent to ob- servant Tennesseeans that should the State be invaded by the Federal Army the advance would come via the Mississippi, or the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers, or south from Louisville. Ky., toward Nashville, or through Cumberland Gap into East Tennessee. To be in readiness to repel these advances masses of the provisional army were concentrated at Memphis, Randolph, Union City and elsewhere in West Tennessee; Forts Henry and Donelson were constructed on the Tennessee and the Cumberland Rivers in Stewart County, and could be garrisoned, if neces-, sary, on short notice by large forces of infantry, and several regiments were stationed at or near Clarksville; a few thousand troops were lo- cated at Camp Cheatham, in Robertson County, and at Camp Trousdale,HISTORY OF TENNESSER. 543 in Sumner County, to guard the approaches from Louisville or Cincin- nati to Nashville and Middle Tennessee; and a considerable force was concentrated at Knoxville to guard Cumberland Gap or other routes that might pour the enemy upon East Tennessee, and to bind that portion of the State. which had strong Federal following, to the cause of the South. Maj.-Gen. G. J. Pillow, at Memphis, commanded the provisional army of the State, with Maj.-Gen. 8. R. Anderson second in command at Nash- ville. Brig.-Gen. B- F. Cheatham was stationed at Union City; Brig.- Gen. John L. T. Sneed at Randolph; Brig.-Gen. R. C. Foster at Camp Cheatham; ‘Brig.-Gen. Felix K. Zollicoffer and later, senior Col. John C. Brown, at Camp Trousdale, and Brig.-Gen. W. R. Caswell and later, Gen. §. R. Anderson at Knoxville. Later, Gen. Zollicoffer assumed com- mand at Knoxville and Gen. Foster at Nashyille. The State seceded June 8, 1861, and as soon as the returns estab- lished the fact of secession beyond doubt, Gov. Harris, although he did not formally transfer the army to the Confederacy until July 351, no longer hesitated to place the forces of the State under the command of officers appointed by the Confederate Government. July 13, under appointment of President Davis, Maj.-Gen. Leonidas Polk took com- mand of the forces along the Mississippi, with headquarters at Mem- phis. About the same time Gideon J. Pillow, Samuel R. Anderson and Daniel S. Donelson, and a few days later B. F. Cheatham and F. K. Zol- licoffer, were commissioned brigadier-generals of the Confederate Army. Gens. Pillow and Cheatham were assigned to commands in West Tennes- see, Gen. Zollicoffer in Kast Tennessee, and Gen. Anderson was trans- ferred to the field in Virginia. On July 26 Gen. Pillow, under orders from Gen. Polk, moved north from Memphis to Randolph with a considerable force, and a few days later advanced to New Madrid and was joined by Gen. Cheatham from Union City with additional troops. About Septem- ber 1 it was communicated to Gen Polk that Gen. Grant, with a large body of troops at Cairo, intended an advance upon Columbus and other points; whereupon, September 7, he moved a large force, soon afterward increased to nearly 10,000 men, and occupied that city and vicinity. This movement met with a prompt demand from Gov. Magoffin, ot Kentucky, for the immediate removal of the Tennessee troops, to which Gen. Polk responded agreeing to do so provided the same requirement was placed upon the Federal troops which, under Gen. Smith September 6, had oe- cupied Paducah and advanced under Gens. Grant, Sherman, McCook, Thomas and others far into Kentucky. This reply of Gen. Polk met the approval of the Confederate Congress, and was sustained by Gen. Albert Sidney Johnston, who, upon the earnest request of Gen. Polk, was ap-cae I AS ————— — ee oe scerencestpehiinnsc ene eee Se TS A Ser areca a il j 544 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. pointed, September 10, to succeed him in command of Department No. 2: The demand to withdraw was also made upon Gen. Zollicoffer, who, Sep- tember 10, had advanced five or six regiments across the line to Cumber- land Ford, in Kentucky, or on the way, and who, with Gen. Polk, had pro- tested against compliance until the Federal forces, advancing across Ken- tucky, should likewise be withdrawn. The South respected the declared neutrality of Kentucky until bodies of Federal troops were permitted to concentrate within her borders with the manifest intention of invading Tennessee and the territory farther south; but when it became certain that such neutrality was working serious injury to the cause of the South, the State having been occupied from east to west by rapidly accumulat- ing Federal forces, the demands of Coy. Magoftin were rightly dis- regarded, and the Confederate troops were not withdrawn. Soon the ru- mors of war became so alarming that all consideration of the neutrality question was voluntarily abandoned. On September 18, Gen. 8. B. Buck- ner with 4,500 troops took possession of Bowling Green, Ky., and im- mediately sent forward a force of 500 to occupy Munfordville. On Oc- tober 11 Maj.-Gen. William J. Hardee assumed command of the force at Bowling Green, which, by October 19, had been increased to 9,956 men. Brig.-Gen. Lloyd Tilghman was placed in command of a small force at Hopkinsville, Ky. The army of Gen. Zollicoffer, comprising from four to six regiments, (two from Tennessee, but varying greatly from time to time), encoun- tered during its advance into Kentucky in September small bands of Federals, with whom light skirmishing was held with some loss. On the 21st of October, at Rockcastle Hills, Ky., 350 Federal troops were found strongly intrenched in an almost inaccessible position. Two Tennessee regiments, under Cols. Newman and Cummings, were ordered to assault, which they did with great gallantry; but the enemy having been re-enforced by 250 men and soon afterward by four more companies, the Confederate troops were repulsed with a loss of 11 killed and 42 wounded, after having inflicted upon the enemy a loss of 4 killed, 18 wounded and 21 captured. An attack by night upon the Federal posi- tion was repulsed, owing to heavy re-enforcements which, without the knowledge of the Confederates, had joined the enemy. Gen. Zollicoffer slowly fell back before the superior force before him to Camp Buckner, at Cumberland Ford. He finally moved back and established his head- quarters at Jacksborough, taking care to blockade the mountain roads approaching Knoxville or East Tennessee, and to post at Cumberland Gap, under Col. Churchwell, a force sufficient to hold it against great opposition. He also placed sufficient troops at Knoxville, under Col. W.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. D45 B. Wood, to repel any probable movement upon that city by the Union- ists of East Tennessee or by an invasion from abroad. For some time after this the perilous position of Gen. Zollicoffer was well understood by Gen. Johnston and the Confederate Government. Advancing steadily upon Hast Tennessee from Louisville, under the immediate command of Gen. Thomas, were twice or thrice as many troops, better armed and equipped than Gen. Zollicoffer commanded; and northeast of Knoxville, in Kast Tennessee, concentrating at several important strategic points were from 2,000 to 5,000 resident Unionists, thoroughly familiar with the country, well armed and resolute. Accordingly, great efforts were made to materially increase the size of this army and to furnish it with effective arms. On the 25th of October Col. R. D. Allison, with about half of the Twenty-fourth Tennessee Regiment and a squadron of cavalry, moved out of Cave City, Ky., and routed afew hundred of the enemy twenty- five miles distant. Considerable skirmishing occurred about this time north of Bowling Green, Ky. Many valuable railroad bridges were burned in East Tennessee. Late in October great anxiety was felt at Clarksville, Nashville and other points along the Cumberland, that, inas- much as only the incomplete Fort Donelson, near Dover, was prepared to oppose the advance of the enemy by water, Federal gun-boats could move up the river with impunity and reduce all the cities within reach of their guns. November 4 Gen. Johnston ordered Gen. Polk at Colum- bus to detach 5,000 troops from that point under Gen. Pillow, with orders to move at once to Glarksville. Ere long Fort Donelson was strongly equipped with suitable ordnance. November 3 Gen. Johnston requested tov. Harris to so far annul his call for 30,000 twelve-months’ men, except such as were efficiently armed, as to have all troops in camp with- out arms and who would not volunteer for three years or during the war, disbanded and sent home, to which Gov. Harris protested, owing to the demoralizing effect such an order would have upon volunteering. Gen. Johnston accordingly reconsidered the matter and modified his request by granting fifteen days to complete the arming of the volunteers, but soon afterward revoked this and the former order. About 9 o’clock on Tth of November a small force under Col. Tappan, Columbus, Ky., by Gen. ttacked at Belmont, the morning of the which had been stationed across the river from Polk to check the inroad of Federal cavalry, was a Mo., by 3,114 men under Gen. Grant; but being re-enforced by three regiments under Gen. Pillow, checked the rapid advance of the enemy somewhat and gradually fell back, fighting gallantly and . e-enforced by three more regiments under desperately against superior numbers until r a rte a = inthe : SS + recto a ee a ON ey — ane SSSF ee OT 2S eg raeaabiceronaeeiaiapesibitet stem caps spapeecheiie Set » ce wegen # bg at Pe eS Slo ee eer ee Lanree? aon ss “s 8 he Neg BS ey EE pg NE RNR ROOT GSI ICTS I SS a 7 — ea al tc aS OREN ry he could get from Mississippi, northern Alabama and Kentucky. 546 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Gen. Cheatham, when, after a furious. contest, the enemy was forced back but recovered, and was forced back again and routed, barely escap- ing capture by a flank movement of two other regiments under the im- mediate command of Gen. Polk.* The Confederate troops actually engaged were about equal numerically to those of the Federals, but were Large quantities of field supplies, cast aside and The battle was characterized by hot and desperate eharges and counter- charges on both sides. Beltzhoover’s battery, fought over, lost and recaptured, was used with splendid effect. On the 6th of November Gen. Polk tendered his resignation, which divided by the river. abandoned by the flying enemy. fell into the hands of the victors. The enemy escaped to his boats. President Davis refused to accept, giving reasons sufficient to induce Gen. Polk to remain in the service. bered 13,866. companies of cavalry, was ordered forward to Hopkinsville, Ky. At November 16 his army num- About the middle of November Col. Forrest, with six this time Gen. Tilghman was transferred to the command of Forts Hen- ry and Donelson. So imminent became the danger of an invasion of Ten- nessee at this period that Gen. Pillow made urgent appeals for reenforce- ments, and Gen. Johnston requested Goy. Harris to place in the field every member of the militia that could be armed, and the Confederate Secretary of War authorized Gen. Johnston to call out every armed. man Late in November Gen. Zollicoffer with his army moved into Kentucky again, and established himself at Mill Springs and Beech Grove. About the middle of December Maj. Gen. G. B. Crittenden assumed command of the eastern district, with headquarters at Knoxville. The following is the consolidated report of the armies of Gens. Hardee and Zollicoffer, officially prepared December 31, 1861.4 | Present for Duty. it ae [ pinnae ae Cavalry. | Attillery 3 Z a : 5 . . ® n 3s | z = z 3 z bo oes, | & D $ 2 3 5 poo Ay wh xs 8 A & = & | ‘ bo ee cubed ie ue |S tal = aus Hardeess Divisions. «....--+. | 412 55387 D2 544 | 19 395 | 6959} 11429 Buckners Division. ..-....... | 407 5972 Ye 655 | 37 688 | 7812} 11761 Bowen’s Division........ | 203: S493 8 esc Sn aes | 3696 4806 @lankgsyBrivadesce sk | 145 1617 08 AO i |e ere 2295 3050 Davis, Brigadet...'-6°. (..... em oSP a ated ele . ‘| 2217 || - 1636. Miscellancoussareacias ek 17 Obie alien le eee lees ee pee 274 615 Zollicoffer’s Division......... ; 238 4515 | 70 | 1095 | 10 226 | 6154 8451 Motley ee | 1475 | 22555 | 218 | 2789|66| 1309| 28407 | 42048. *War of the Rebellion ; Official Records of the Union and Grant. and Confederate Armies. Reports of Gens. Polk +On the 7th of January, 1862, Gen. Leonidas Polk’s report showed : 869 officers and 11,161 men present for duty; aggregate present, 12,030; aggregate present and absent, 18,675. *Sixty days’ Volunteers.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 547 On the evening of January 18, 1862, Gen, Crittenden with about 4,000 effective troops was at Beech Grove, Ky., on the Cumberland River, oppo- site Mill Springs. Having held a council of war with Gens. Zollicoffer and Carroll and his regimental commanders, whereby it appeared that two large Union forces, one at Somerset, and the other ator near Webb's Gross Roads, under Gen. G. H. Thomas, were intending to unite and to- gether attack the Confederate forces, and whereby it appeared that, owing to heavy rains, Fishing Creek dividing the two forces could not be crossed in less than two days, the council therefore determined without dissent to attack Gen. Thomas early the next morning and, if possible, annihilate him, and then fall upon the other Federal force approaching from Somerset and also effect its ruin. Accordingly about midnight the forward movement was commenced. After a rapid march of nine miles the enemy was encountered in force about 7 o'clock on the morn- ing of the 19th and the battle sharply commenced. Gen. Zollicofier fell dead upon the field quite early in the action. The gallant Confederates, poorly armed and handled, though fighting stubbornly and holding their ground for several hours, were finally driven back by superior numbers and severely defeated, the defeat ending ‘n much of arout. Their loss was 125 killed, 309 =unded sand) 99 missing. | They retreated to Gainesborough and then to Camp Fogg, in Tennessee. The Seven- teenth, Nineteenth, Twentieth, Twenty-fifth, Twenty-eighth, and Twenty- ninth Tennessee Regiments participated In this engagement. About noon on the 6th of February, 1862, Fort Henry on the Tennessee, with an armament of sixteen guns and a garrison of 2.985 men,* commanded by Gen. Lloyd Tilghman, was invested by seven Federal gun-boats carrying fifty-five guns and an overwhelming force of infantry, all under Gen. Grant, and in a few hours was surrendered. ‘The Confederate forces escaped to Fort Donelson, except about eighty who were surrendered with Gen. Tilghman and the fort. It was clearly evident at this time that the enemy was advancing all along the line east and west across Kentucky with far superior forces, and as soon as Fort Henry fell, Gen. Johnston, at Bowling Green, perceived that should Fort Donelson also fall, his position would become at once untenable, and the Confederate line would have to be established somewhere south of Nashville, as the Federal gun-boats would have no difficulty in capturing Clarksville, Nash- ville and other points along the rivers Cumberland and Tennessee. AS it seemed evident, owing to the superior forces of the Federals, that Fort Donelson would fall sooner or later, Gen. Hardee, with his forces at move south to Nashville and cross the Bowling Green, was ordered to Oficial Report of Col. A. Heiman.ater valerie 7, apis a ay Leave egal: Sed ed - ee ee a 4 “AES SLATE ELLE = 548 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. river. At this time there was intense excitement at Clarksville and Nashville. The enemy had entered the State and Tennessee was sure to become a battle-ground. The Tennessee regiments at Fort Henry were the Tenth, Forty-eighth and Fifty-first, and Gantt’s battalion of cay- alry and several small miscellaneous commands, including the batteries. As soon as possible after the fall of Fort Henry, re-enforeements were burried to Fort Donelson. try force of Federals, assisted by six gun-boats, appeared before the fort Late on the 12th of February a large infan- and the next morning began a combined attack. Re-enforcements arrived under Gen. Floyd all infantry attacks of the 13th were handsomely re- pulsed. The gun-boats effected no serious damage upon the fort. It turned cold, and intense suffering resulted to the wearied troops. On the afternoon of the 14th the gun-boats were defeated, several disabled and all driven away without injury to the fort. Sharp skirmishes occurred between the infantry, and heavy re-enforcements of the enemy were extended, having in view the complete investment of the fort. Karly on the 15th Gen. Pillow, in force, on the left, attacked the enemy’s right with great fury, driving it slowly from the field. A sharp at- tack on the right was re-enforced by Gen. B. R. Johnson, and gen- erally the whole Federal line was driven back after stubborn resist- ance, but rallied upon being heavily re-enforced, and with artillery re- newed the attack. The Confederates took the defensive and fell back to their lines. Heavy masses of the Federals threw themselves upon the right flank, encountering desperate resistance, and finally effected a lodgment which could not be moved. Night closed the bloody day. A council of Gens. Pillow, Floyd, Buckner, Johnson, -et al, decided to sur- render early the next morning. The command’was transferred to Gen. Buckner, who surrendered the next morning nearly 15,000 troops, Gens. Pillow and Floyd and their escort, and Gen. Forrest and his cavalry es- caping. This was a serious loss to the Confederacy and an unnecessary one, The result was a total abandonment of the Confederate line and the establishment of an irregular new one, extending from Columbus, Ky., south through West Tennessee to northern Mississippi; thence to north- ern Alabama, and thence to northeast Tennessee. Nashville was aban- doned by the troops, the Governor and many others retreating south with the army of Gen. Johnston. fear and excitement. Clarksville and Nashville were in a fever of The large Federal Army moved forward and suc- cessively took possession of those two cities and others f Middle Tennessee, and the Federal line was c arther south in orrespondinely advanced throughout the State. At Murfreesboro Gen. Johnston, with about 11,- 000 men, was joined by Gen. Crittenden, and the fugitives from Donel-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 549 gon and other miscellaneous forces, and an army of about 17,000 men was formed capable of offering battle. Gen. Floyd, with 2,500 troops, was sent to Chattanooga. Columbus, Ky., was evacuated March 4, that army moving south to Jackson. Gen. Johnston moved to Decatur, Ala., thence to Corinth, Miss., where, after great exertion, and with the assist- ance of Gen. Beauregard, he succeeded in organizing a strong army of about 50,000 men. The Confederate line at this time extended from New Madrid, Mo., to Island No. 10; thence to Humboldt, Tenn. ; thence to Corinth, Miss.; thence along the Memphis & Charleston Railroad to Bast Tennessee. On the 19th of February Commodore A. H. Foote, of the United States Navy, reached Clarksville with the gun-boats Conestoga and Cairo meeting with no resistance from the small forts in that vicinity, and, after issuing a proclamation, at the instance of Hon. Cave Johnson, Judge Wisdom, the mayor and others, announcing his intention to re- spect the private rights of all citizens peacefully disposed who should not parade their hostile sentiments, and to take possession of all military supples and stores, none of which must be destroyed, took military posses- sion of the city. Gen. Grant arrived on the 21st. On the 19th Gov. Har- ris issued a proclamation calling out the entire effective military force of the State. He had left Nashville accompanied by the other State officers to save the public archives and property, and to establish a temporary capi- tal within the Confederate lines. He moved to Memphis, but soon aiter- ward personally took the field. On the 20th, at Memphis, having con- yened the Legislature, he gave in his message his reasons for the tempo- rary removal of the seat of government, the archives and the State prop- erty from Nashville. The defeat of Crittenden at Fishing Creek had flanked Gen. Johnston’s line of defense, and no opposing force was left to prevent the army of Gen. Buell from moying upon the capital. The fall of Fort Henry opened the Tennessee up to Alabama to the enemy, and. the fall of Fort Donelson left Nashville an easy prey for the large army of Gen. Grant, which was sure to move upon it within a few days, Gen. Johnston, with the small force left him, being utterly unable to hold the place. He announced that since the act of May 6, 1861, he had raised, organized and put into the field fifty-nine regiments of infantry, one regiment of cavalry, eleven cavalry battalions, and over twenty inde- pendent companies, mostly artillery. Of these the Confederate Govern- mant had armed only about 15,000. The Governor advised the passage of a bill raising, arming and equipping a provisional army OL volun- teers. On the 24th of February Gen. Buell and his advance, Mitchell’s division, arrived at Edgefield, and in the evening were waited upon by3 2 es = ay " Sy eee ree ¥ tenement penne sarcosirgs aman get lagi weep Ln useckGeeraate eran a an oe sR ag: a a nea eee ta ncaa 550 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. the mayor and city authorities of Nashville, to whom assurance of per- On the morning of February 25 seven gun-boats, bearing a considerable force of Federal troops under Brig.-Gen. Nelson, reached Nashville, landed with- sonal safety and uninterrupted business relations were given. out opposition and took possession of the city. News of the surrender of Fort Donelson had reached Nashville Sunday morning, February 17, Scores immediately started for the south; the bridges across the Cumberland were destroyed, the military stores were thrown open to the populace, ) A similar state of affairs had Time quieted the apprehensions of the citi- On the 5th of March Gen. G. T. Beauregard assumed command of the Army of the February 24 Gen. J. K. Jackson was placed in command of the forces at Chattanooga. About when the citizens were anticipating reports of a great victory. and panic and chaos for a time reigned. transpired at Clarksville. zens, though the Federal troops saw few smiling faces. Mississippl, with headquarters at Jackson. Tenn. this time, or soon afterward, Gen. E. K. Smith was assigned to the com- mand of the Confederate forces of East Tennessee, with headquarters at Knoxville. After the fall of Donelson and the evacuation of Middle Tennessee. the Confederate Army concentrated along the railroad from Iuka to Corinth and from Corinth to Bethel, and hurriedly organized, being re- enforced by two divisions from Gen. Polk’s command at Columbus, and later by the remainder of the corps, and an entire corps from Alabama and Mississippi under Gen. Bragg. . Thus re-enforced and equipped under Gens. Johnston and Beauregard, two of the ablest generals of the war, this magnificent army of heroes (about 60,000 strong) prepared to take the offensive. The army of Gen. Grant had concentrated at Pitts- burgh Landing on the Tennessee, and Buell from Nashville was hasten- ing to re-enforce him. Gen. Johnston determined, if possible, to crush Grant before the arrival of Buell. The advance began on the 3d of April, but, owing to severe rainstorms, the heavy roads and the inexperi- ence of the troops in marching, did not reach the enemy, as was hoped and expected, on the morning of the 5th, and not until late in the after- noon. It was then determined to wait until the following (Sunday) morning to begin the attack. The army was divided into four corps: The first under Gen. Polk on the left; the second under Gen. Bragg in the center; the third, under Gen. Hardee on the right; and the reserve corps, under Gen. J. C. Breckinridge—a total of about 40,000 effective troops. * The attack began at daylight on the morning of the 6th, with all the fury of that fine army, burning with a desire to retrieve the losses-of Henry *Gen. Johnston telegraphed President Davis that the army consisted of about 40,000 effective men.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. DOL and Donelson. The enemy was completely surprised as regards a gen- eral attack, and this fact, combined with the furious impetuosity of the onset under skillful and competent leaders. awarded success to the Con- foderate arms in every part of the field. The enemy, though surprised, rallied, and with some exceptions fought with wonderful stubbornness ; but the Confederate dash, intrepidity and rapid and adroit maneuvers on the field were irresistible. Large numbers of the: enemy fled panic stricken back to the river. After ten hours of desperate fighting every encampment of the enemy was in possession of the Confederate forces. But one position had been held, that at the “Hornet's Nest” by Gen. Prentiss, and that had been surrounded, and the entire division with its commander captured. It was a splendid victory, corresponding with the genius of the General who conceived and inspired it; but in the moment of victory, late in the afternoon, this illustrious soldier was severely wounded, from the effects of which he soon died. His great worth was fully appreciated and his loss bitterly lamented by the entire South. The battle raged on until night closed the bloody scene. The victory was emphatic, but ++ remained for short, sharp work on the morrow to seal it with certainty. No sooner had the death of Gen. Johnston, which occurred about the middle of the afternoon, been announced to the strug- gling troops, than involuntarily a dispiriting check was thrown upon the entire army. Gen. Beauregard who immediately assumed command, was known to have not only opposed the attack from the start, but to have counseled withdrawal late on the night of the 5th. This fact produced the impression that the new commander would alter the tactics of the advance, if he did not absolutely order it checked, and accordingly, in doubt as to what was to be done, the victorious army throughout its entire length experienced a severe paralytic stroke, and hesitated for about -an hour, until orders came from Gen. Beauregard to continue the attack. But the impression of the doubtful designs of the commander still pre- yailed, and served to unnerve the onset, and accordingly the headlong attack which had characterized the Confederate advance during the day and was designed to assure the victorious results within reach, was per- mitted to languish until too late to be remedied. The demoralized Fed- erals were allowed to retire unmolested and to form a new line, while the exhausted Confederates also fell somewhat back, and spent the night in the abandoned camps of the enemy. During the night the enemy was heavily re-enforced, and on the following morning, instead of meeting the demoralized army of Gen. Grant, the weary, but elated Confederates en- countered the fresh and powerful troops of Gen. Buell, and although desperate efforts were made to complete the victory, it was found 1mpos-Ua Pil} 1 11} : HA Pade HG ia | Ay | il anh it | it Wa } if , a he fai lI , Wh i] 4 aj i | Mi) | I eth i | Wa | | A A \ maa | | : ; in i ae a a pate aed ace at } x a) a th iF LR j j i eee a) Bae HH a Aine fH i era: a Pao ae { Ah ae a a 5 Bb Ae) Walt fi Bab dita | } el eee yt he Hal | Deen ed Pate EO eT AB Ma | Pee iP Pee init Anh E ; te i\ ‘ iy i HHUA TALAG HMR Te TAL TE a a TH Pe HH a an) ea | SR! TAMA 1 F D tee . i ' : | PRO mee tt 100) bees tee Ve easy ; ay, Hak, Pe due | Wt i ‘| ait ' } | . ie RP { Ee) bart Hh a ’ nae (eats il Winer bean Aber deal Ve ede bee de ai Wee eat iii] r ay ts j Lh ae BELT bay ane ny cab te ! Hl feat seul | eh i ea Wem | ny ee ¢ a ' Para aes] Poa | % fee. at) ait | es cetiail | tie Naa Ca) See |e Hee Bie hs | | t it eal i (| | On Ra | ip | Hal eat ati eo ta galt | i A ai i i . ee rl mc EAE IEP SEI TR I I oF DdD2, HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. sible before superior numbers of fresh troops, and the army slowly fell back and finally moved to Corinth. The entire loss of the Confederate Army in this engagement, was 1,728 killed, 8,012 wounded, and 959 The loss of the enemy was 1,700 killed, 7,495 wounded, and 3,022 captured.t The effective force of the Confederates was nearly 40,000 men,{ while that of the Federals, not counting the army of Gen. missing. * Buell, probably slightly exceeded that number. About the middle of March, 1862, Andrew Johnson, who had been appointed military governor of Tennessee by President Lincoln, reached Nashville and issued an address to the people of the State, and took charge of the State property. From this date forward there was a con- stant conflict between the two governments of Govs. Harris and Johnson. Harris did everything possible for the cause of the South, and Johnson everything possible for the cause of the North. Despite the presence of troops in all portions of the State of either the Federal or Confederate Governments, recruiting continued for both armies. Skirmishes oc- curred almost daily in some portion of the State between citizens, organ- ized or unorganized, or between small squads of either army stationed to guard railroads, supplies or important points. The citizens, Confeder- ate or Federal, were forced through three long, dreary and memora- ble years to realize the horrors of the uninterrupted presence of an armed and powerful force of soldiery, who often took advantage of their power to riot and rob, and to menace and maltreat inoffensive non-com- batants endeavoring to make a living by the arts of peace. Under the conscript law twelve-months’ organizations were perpetuated. This worked great hardship upon many volunteers and kindled no little dis- content, which time alone quenched. On the 14th of March, 1862, nearly two companies of the First East Tennessee ( Confederate) Cavalry, stationed at Jacksborough, were sur- prised through the treachery of Union residents and captured by a regi- ment of Federal troops, which had rapidly crossed the Cumberland Mountains. On the 19th of June. after a spirited and stubborn resistance against numerous attacks through several weeks, Col. J. E. Rains was forced to evacuate Cumberland Gap. January 21, 1862, his force at the Gap consisted of seventy-four officers and 1.523 men present and fit for duty. On the 11th of April Huntsville, Ala., was captured by Gen. O. M. Mitchell, who moved there from Murfreesboro, via Shelbyville and Fayetteville, under the order of Gen. Buell, with about 5.000 men. This *Official report of Gen. Beauregard, April 11, 1862. fOfficial report of the War Department. {The official report prepared under Gen. strength of 35,953 infantry and artillery and 4,382 cz prepared by Gen. Bragg in June, showed an effecti cavalry; total, 37,011. seauregard’s orders, April 21, showed a total effective avalry or a total of 40,335. The official report of this battle ve strength of 33,270 infantry, 1,857 artillery, and 1,884 Another account shows 38,773 effective troops.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE, 5d3 movement, menacing Chattanooga, the rear of the army at Corinth and the heart of the Confederacy, found only two regiments at Chattanooga ; and orders were issued by Gen. Beauregard upon Pemberton’s command for six regiments to move to that point at once. The enemy seized Stev- enson, Decatur and Bridgeport, and menaced the right flank of John- ston’s army at Corinth. At this time Brig-Gen. Danville Leadbetter commanded the forces in and around Chattanooga. During the month of May the Confederate Army quietly held its position at Corinth until a general attack seemed imminent, when it silently evacuated the place. Several sharp conflicts occurred during the siege. Owing to the unhealthfulness of the locality, the impurity of the water and the bad food and inaction, an army which had been in- creased to a total effective strength of 112,092 was reduced to 52,706 upon its arrival at Tupelo, to which point it retreated. The Army of the West, under Gen. Farl Van Dorn, with a total effective strength of 1%,- 000, had been added to the Army of the Mississippi. So great was the reduction in effective strength that a court of inquiry was appointed by the Confederate Government to investigate and report upon the conduct of the quarter-master’s department of the army, but that department was exonerated from all blame. late in June, 1862, Gen. Braxton Bragg succeeded Gen. Beauregard. in command of the army. Island No. 10, on the Mississippi, fell April 7-8. On the 4th of June, Fort Pillow on the Mississippi, twelve miles above Randolph, was evacuated, and Randolph fell soon afterward. Memphis also, after a sharp resistance, was compelled to surrender to the enemy on the 6th. To the demand to surrender, Mayor John Park responded, “In reply I have only to say that as the civil authorities have no means of defense, by the force of circumstances the city is In your hands.” The Confederate loss here was 82 killed and wounded, 75 prisoners, and 4 gun-boats seine, vv reall @e wae city was a most serious loss to the South, as it opened the way to Vicks- burg. Jackson was occupied by the enemy June 7. Strong movements nooga by Mitchell’s army. July 13 Murfrees- were made against Chatta emy by Gen. Forrest. He captured 800 boro was recaptured from the en prisoners. On the 12th of May a Union convention w action was perfected to extend the civil authority of the Federal Govern- ment over the State. Tazewell in Hast Tennessee was taken by the 5th and 6th of August. Soon after ecaptured by Col. Woodward, of again fell into the enemy 8 d throughout the State, as held at Nashville, when enemy alter a sharp battle on the this, about August 19, Clarksville was 1 the Confederate Army, but in September hands. Numerous small engagements occurre agen NS Spare eeTea Ty ee: nn aes ea - 5 we E a wr oe — 2 : iy ot omaes iat ae See S aa km 3 * - aa UST T it } 8 aT “ hari % i, tS ‘| =f Et - ~ ee EE ieee ars at 94 So a. F Oe eee eee ‘ ; : I 3 f Se ik a ee Seca » <. es q hi ¥ es = * - - Figg * ataues ° oS ee = i aye Es eae Be Fi eee : eet z . > tO a : — as: Reenter s mE — ee ae aie — - eR aaerUr fi id aie sgl eo asa Ca Cea 7° ba iit ag I a a Nae ahs wary: + SAI Dod HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. with varying successes. Much of the State was reoccupied by Confed- erate forces, which were recruited within the Federal lines and which preyed upon the garrisons left to hold the leading localities. Forrest became famous as a daring and remarkably successful cavalry com- mander and raider. He destroyed enormous amounts of Federal stores, captured thousands of the enemy, and constantly recruited for the Con- federate Army and particularly his own command. Guerrillas without any constituted authority preyed upon Federal or Confederate stores, and in Thera instances committed acts not justified even by the bloody code of se, This rendered residence in the State humiliating and danger- ous, particularly to women without protectors. After a short time spent at Tupelo in resting, recruiting and refitting Gen. Bragg moved with his fine army to Chattanooga, outmarching Gen. Buell, who had apparently started for the same point. Buell returned with his army to Nashville, and Grant assumed command of the Federal forces around Corinth. Bragg now determined to take the offensive and invade Kentucky, expecting by this strategy to either force Buell out of Tennessee or to capture Louisville and possibly invade Indiana and Ohio. He also hoped to arouse a large following in Kentucky, and in- tended to collect enormous quantities of supplies. He left Chattanooga August 28, and marched northward via Pikeville and Sparta. A few days before he began this movement Gen. Kirby Smith, aware of his in- tentions, advanced northward also, via Jacksborough, through Big Creek Gap, living mainly on green corn, and halted near Richmond for the ar- rival of Bragg. His movement flanked the Federal force at Cumberland Gap, which beat a precipitate retreat to the Ohio River. At London his cavalry killed and wounded 30 and captured 111 of the Federals. At Richmond the Federal troops under Gen. Manson, nearly equal to his own, moved forward and attacked him, but were routed and _ several thousand of them captured. He moved on to Cynthiana. At Munford- ville, with trifling loss, Bragg captured several thousand prisoners. He reached Bardstown September 23. As soon as Buell saw the designs of Bragg he marched rapidly north to protect Louisville, and arrrived there ahead of the latter. Bragg, finding he could not induce Kentucky to join the Confederacy, although he had gone through the ceremony of in- stalling Richard Hawes provisional governor, turned to retrace his steps, meeting with no obstacle for some time to prevent his collecting enor- mous quantities of supplies. At Harrodsburg he formed a junction with Kirby Smith. Finally Buell, under pressure of the War Department, and with an army twice as strong, moved out to attack him. At Perry- ville, October 8, the two armies collided. About 15,000 of Brage’s armyHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Or Cr a fought McCook’s division of nearly twice as many and routed them from the field, capturing several thousand prisoners. He then retreated slowly, passing Cumberland Gap, marching to Knoxville, and thence moving by rail to Tullahoma and marching up to Murfreesboro. Buell was super- seded by Maj. Gen. W. S. Rosecrans, who concentrated his army at Nash- ville. Both armies were reorganized, the Confederate taking the name << Army of the T ennessee,” which it retained during the remainder of the war. Bragg’s army was weakened by the removal of Stevenson’s divis- ion to Mississippl. December 26 Rosecrans moved out to offer battle, and arrived be- fore Murfreesboro late on the 30th. Bragg determined to anticipate the attack, and at daylight on the 31st threw a heavy force upon the Federal right flank. So furious was the onset that, although the enemy fought with great stubbornness, the entire flank was swept around upon the right center. Rosecrans had determined to adopt the same tactics, and accordingly early in the morning massed a heavy force on the Conteder- ate right, but was too late. Before he could accomplish anything in that portion of the field, his right was routed and his entire army was in dan- ger of destruction. The victorious Confederates were checked late in the afternoon. During the night the Federals formed and perfected a new line, and the Confederates strengthened their advanced position. The next day some skirmishing occurred, and a threatening movement was made upon the Confederate right and rear, but as a whole the two armies remained idle and watchful. On the 2d of January Bragg at- tacked the Federal force that had been thrown across the river and in- trenched in a strong position, but after desperate fighting was repulsed, and the next day retreated to Shelbyville and Tullahoma. On the first day of the battle Hardee commanded the divisions of McCown and Cle- burne on the left; Polk, those of Cheatham and Withers in the center, and Breckinridge the force on the right. Wheeler’s and Wharton’s cavalries, respectively, were on the right and the left flanks. On the Federal right was McCook, in the center- Thomas, and on the left Crit- tenden. Accounts and returns differ, but each army had about 45,000 effective troops, the Federals tox rard the last being re-enforced. Bragg’s total loss was 10,125; Rosecrans’ 11,598. The former lost three pieces of artillery, the latter twenty-eight.* On the 30th of December, 1862, Wheeler’s cavalry, in a daring raid, captured LaVergne, Rock Springs and Nolensville. About two weeks before that Forrest had cut loose from Bragg, crossed the Tennessee River at Clifton, captured Trenton, Humboldt, Union City and other *10bese figures were carefully prepared from official reports.556 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. places, with large quantities of supplies and Dee of prisoners, and rejoined Bragg without serious loss. March 5, 1863, Gen. Van Dorn captured 2,000 Federals under Col. John Coburn at Spring Hill. In April Col. Streight, Federal cavalry leader, invaded Georgia, did con- siderable damage, but was pursued and captured by Gen. Forrest. In June Gen. John Morgan started North and invaded Indiana and Ohio, but was finally captured and his command dispersed. Bragg passed the winter at Shelbyville, Tullahoma and vicinity, while Rosecrans remained at Murfreesboro. June 24, 1863, Rosecrans began an advance and endeavored to flank Bragg’s right, but the latter being largely out- numbered, retreated slowly and finally crossed the mountains to Chat- tanooga. About the middle of August the Federal Army began to cross the mountains to confront Bragg. In the meantime Vicksburg had fallen and Gettysburg had driven the Army of Northern Virginia south of the Potomac. Gen. Bragg, seeing that if he remained at Chattanooga his communications would be cut by flank movements of the large and rapidly increasing army before him, moved southward toward Lafayette, preparing to threaten the right flank of the enemy, or his rear via northern Alabama, or to fall upon him as he advanced southward from Chattanooga in detachments through the mountain passes and whip him in detail. ‘The advance in detach- ments was really made, and had the re-enforcements expected arrived for Bragg, the division of McCook far out toward Alpine would have been crushed before Rosecrans perceived his danger. As it was the latter became alarmed and corrected his mistake before Bragg felt able to take advantage of it. Both armies had been heavily re-enforced and the anxious gaze of both nations was riveted upon them. A portion of Longstreet’s corps from Virginia under Hood, and a considerable force from Johnston’s army in the Mississippi had formed a junction with Bragg. The enemy concentrated somewhat near Crawfish Spring, near =) where, September 18, a few preliminary skirmishes occurred. McCook occupied the right of the enemy, Thomas the left, and Crittenden the center. . Polk was on the Confederate right, Hood on the left and Hill in the center. The battle of Chickamauga began early on the morning of the 19th and raged furiously all day without decisive result. The fol- lowing night brought Longstreet with the remainder of his corps. Bragg’s aim had been to break and rout the Federal left, then crush the center and seize the Chattanooga road. Upon the arrival of Longstreet, Bragg summoned his generals in council. He divided the army into two commands—Longstreet with six divisions on the left and Polk with five divisions on the right. The latter was ordered to attack with all hisa j Sort Xf \\ \\\\ SS SY Nn O @ — J — > SIKMIT avsapafuo) SIULT TVA ADIT [HJ — ) — Jc) felaHlitn Ast © A wn 2 a 4 j AV INV ( 1 in) JN jo “@s _w rl 8a, os OD 0 Ni EC he ea ee Kung wzbon” "ee BA “p-Z, 2 Us!) — Ey oO SS > : f - zim ; $Co7, \\ <* wr : eoMA nh Ee 2, D'y ok oo Vy . ot EEO NS I =| 4 Eke (1 0 WAY AS SEA ER A\\3 z aA ~ S S S SS s% SZonstEwA ST Si Line WN an MosAWHobp Or e6 S55 SAU W \ HSV LLIAM. NVWO33LS afiq) BLOT Bt LS ~\\ = Sony % 3 aS 2\ OU ITEM S| SI . Aya - prox ¥ \ UU \ *"SOd GNZ NWWONIH If O DD p> < = = cS g ( = 2! (z 25 \ QO ® SS =——| et a ‘ i ' - ‘dee a ae) { t if ‘ HE : eu 7 ae ATH i} : . re be i i TH) ( fn ti ae i | i i Hi i patie vespenginias. pl RNS San? pnip lawn ete age gt CeaseHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. = Cyr Cl power at daylight, but it was nearly 9 o clock before his troops were in motion. Had he complied with the order there is little doubt that Thomas would have been crushed before the arrival of Negley’s division. As it was Thomas was the ‘“ Rock of Chickamauga” which the Confed- erate hosts failed to overturn. Thus do trifles serve to turn enormous tides. The battle began about 9 o'clock and was continued with furious intensity for many hours, the Confederate cause on the whole advancing, until finally a gap was opened by a misunderstanding of orders, 1t was claimed, in the enemy’s right center* through which the vigilant Long- street threw Hood’s and other divisions like an avalanche. This move- ment was decisive, the whole right wing and part of the center of the enemy crumbling in pieces and rolling back in confusion toward Chatta- nooga, bearing their commanders, including Rosecrans, with them. Thomas on the left was re-enforced on a very strong ridge, and held his position until night, despite the utmost efforts of the Confederates to crush him, and thus saved the Federal Army from destruction. At night he withdrew toward Chattanooga, and left the field to the victorious Con- federates. The battle was over. The losses were about equal (over 15,000) to each army. Rosecrans ‘remained at Chattanooga where he was besieged for sev- eral weeks succeeding the battle of Chickamauga. He was superseded. in command by Gen. Grant October 19. arly in October Wheeler and Wharton entered the Federal lines with their cavalry forces, and in the Sequatchie Valley destroyed about 800 wagons of supplies designed for the starving army of the Federals. They did extensive damage, and finally rejoined Bragg via northern Alabama. October 27 Gen. Hooker managed to open the Federal line of supplies, which virtually raised the siege. Longstreet had been detached to move against Burnside at Knox- ville. Bragg occupied Missionary Ridge with a weakened army too much extended, and Grant, in Chattanooga, received re-enforcements and supplies. On the 23d of November Grant advanced and drove back the Confederate advance lines and occupied and intrenched the ground. ‘The next day Lookout Mountain was taken, and on the 25th the whole Fed- eral Army in overwhelming force swept up to the top of the ridge, driv- ing the Confederate lines, after sharp work, from the field. Gen. Joseph E. Johnston succeeded Bragg in command of the army, *This order, written by an aid of Gen. Rosecrans at the latter’s direction, read as follows: ‘“The genera commanding directs that you close up on Reynolds as fast as possible, and support him.” As will be pen cer ye } “closing up” and “supporting” are two widely different acts, and hence the order was contradictory. a e officer to whom it was addressed, Gen. Wood, had been a short time before sharply reprimanded for neglect by Gen. Rosecrans, and now concluded to construe the order in the latter sense of “supporting only, and accord- inuly withdrew his division, leaving a wide gap in the line of battle, which the vigilant eye of Longstreet at once detected with the results as above described. 35 Sn a eM a age aii it ire the ey ae i i fii hp ea hia } i} ) WW 5 it ir ii Milas 1 Wee L} i r I ( ‘ y EE es.—— om 5 & =| wee. Sete wi a ak E ——d ile ee - — < acss ~ ~ Se 2 ay BE ere ee. Co Eee wenn eae . rig nt i a ; - = ~ ; ae = 7 ———— a a aes = aa errors i sn Py eae sera en Sen a aria liW mci es pacientes tlt An ee es —_— : = 3 ‘ 7 ——~ 7 > = = oa ——- = 3 ‘ “ = = = —— ; ~~ eee ae : aie — Se ma on gs = = ae SSS SS = qc Te SETS ae Sao Sa es sree se ~ e areata = ~ ete —$————$— —e _~ a : =a ms —— — —— silat cheat ai ha ——— — a nemo : ae — te a Ne cia ~ a 7 eee RS essa Se ea ae Se See eee aon ; : ; : - — nT aoe oreo ee — = : Sa eaia a geaeenaeas poekarnaeon aaa seoral ao ee ee nee ~ oe ar ee — SS aE z ean et a ———- m 7 — - ~“r - r x a ee erm pea pongenereeye é mee . : 4 . ; a 3 ate Rare nT dnt - ~~ - - - “ . ‘ ns np eo iret 7 aes pure sepa OCIS a eases ot s = a See res yee a HISTORY OF TENN ESSEE. . . . . : < r 4 > Ents ae the latter relinquishing at his own request. ake W inter of 1863-64 was and around Dalton in recelving instruction and discipline * passed in neral movement of Federal troops Late in February, to co-operate with a ge ked the Confederates at Dalton, in the absence in the west, Thomas attac Gen. W. T. Sherman took com- of Hardee’s corps, but was repulsed. mand of the Federals in March, and Gen. Grant was transferred to the chief command at Washington. About the middle of March, 1863, Gen. BPorrest entered West Tennessee from Mississippi, captured Jackson, Hickman, Ky., Paducah and other places with large quanti- Union City, - and April 18 captured Fort ties of supplies and numerous prisoners Pillow with 557 Federal troops, of whom 962 were colored. Later he dashed into Memphis but was compelled to leave almost immediately ; and also defeated and routed the Federals in Arkansas. About the middle of August, 1863, Gen. Burnside, with a force of nearly 20,000 men at Richmond, Ky., moved southward to cross the Cum- berland Mountains and take possession of East Tennessee. Knoxville was reached September 3; about the. same time Gen. Buckner, unable to resist, withdrew all the available force there to re-enforce Bragg. Gen. Frazier, who occupied Cumberland Gap, was forced to surrender 2,000 men on the 9th, Gen. Burnside then scattered his command to guard and protect Hast Tennessee. Gen. Sam Jones did excellent work against several of the small commands, cutting tnem in pieces and capturing prisoners and supplies. Suddenly, without warning, October 20, Gen. Longstreet moved up from Chattanooga. At Philadelphia, below Loudon, he fell upon a force of Federals 2,000 strong under Col. Wolford and routed them, capturing many prisoners. Moving onward Burnside in foree was encountered November 6, near Campbell’s Station, where a sharp battle was fought. The enemy was forced back, but rallied until night when he retreated to his intrenchments at Knoxville. Both com- mands were handled with conspicuous ability. November 17 Longstreet invested the city. Sharp fighting occurred, and at last having been joined by Gen. Sam Jones, Longstreet November 28 and 29 assaulted but was repulsed. December 5 the siege was raised, as heavy re-enforcements for Burnside approached from Chattanooga. In December, 1863, Wheeler’s cavalry had a sharp engagement with the enemy at Charlestown, Hast Tennessee, over a wagon train. About the same time John Morgan and Martin Armstrong had a sharp battle with Gen. S. D. Sturgis at Mossy Creek, near New Market. Gen. Vance, who entered East Tennessee in January, 1864, after doing considerable _ *As a detailed account of the Georgia campaign would carry the military history beyond the limits as- signed it in this volume, only an outline will be given of the movements in which the Army of Tennessee participated.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Cnr O} CO damage, was defeated and captured by the Federals. In January and February, 1864, Morgan and Sturgis fought several sharp battles ASere ersville, Dandridge, Strawberry Plains and elsewhere. About the first of June, John Morgan started to invade Kentucky. He was routed near Oynthiana by Gen. Burbridge, and made his way into West Virginia, where he collected a small force and returned to Hast Tennessee, captured Greeneville, but was killed and his force dis- persed in September ‘by Gen. ‘Gillem. In October Vaughn’ and Palmer’s forces were defeated at Morristown by Gen. Gillem; but in November the latter was routed by Breckinridge. In September Forrest invaded Middle Tennessee and gave the Federals much annoyance. In Decem- ber the Federal forces under Stoneman, Burbridge, Gillem and others were united, and the Confederates in Kast Tennessee under Breckinridge, Vaughn and others were overpowered and dispersed. In the spring of 1864.an offensive campaign was proposed for Gen. Johnston, to move suddenly into Hast Tennessee, cross the river at Kingston, where a junction would be formed with Longstreet, ordered there for that purpose, and thus with an army of about 75,000 mea to threaten Sherman’s rear and jprevent him from invading the South, as well as to threaten Tennessee and Kentucky. But this was not to be. Early in May, 1864, the Federal Army under Sherman began its ad- ‘vance on Dalton, and successively, by flank movements, forced Johnston who had not been re-enforced as was designed should he undertake an offensive campaign, to retreat. Many have thought that this campaign from Dalton to Atlanta was not surpassed by any other of the war in brilliant and masterly movements, in furious and generally judicious oO battles, and in the splendid condition of both armies. From beginning to end it was a campaign of strategy. The overwhelming force of the Federal commander enabled ‘him to face the Confederate Army with many more than its own number and to flank it with a large additional force. Vigilant as a tiger, Johnston watched the adroit coils of his wily adver- sary expanding and skillfully withdrew, inflicting upon him all the injury possible. At Rocky Face Ridge, Mill Creek Gap, Resaca, Cassville, New Hope Church, Dallas, Lost Mountain, Pine Mountain, Kenesaw Moun- tain, Nose Creek, Powder Spring, Peach Tree Creek (where Johnston was superseded by Gen. J. B. Hood), Cobb’s Mills, around Atlanta, a cam- paign of about four months almost a continuous battle was fought and not once was the Confederate Army driven from its chosen position by the assaults of the enemy. At Lick ‘Skillet road and Jonesboro sharp bat- tles were fought. Atlanta was evacuated by the army of Hood September I. He eT ———_ l = TT TE ae oe eeis - 7 % BGI Alea ASE RES ERC cee — — —— ns ore ws ¢ ~ a ee <= Cee 3 0 eee —— ar . . ‘ CR ge FEE EET I a ee = aescaa wl * we Law ols fa 3 ae... ens x. - ite ’ Fees , < Fatt, 3 : t i Selon x E a = = ee = aa ei ’ = < es eee : = 7s oe RT tas cd sae os - | a m9 carer arses senor seep dara ar aa wai aire ea i ae = = sete Se Mane = Winco ms ye : j ; Fe as Slee ce ii nearing mt i aris eee LOM yk ee a5 acaba wi ee baa di ci a a oe Se cii JAYSas eBaagsg i ae NT ML ERRORS Ee eee raciee Belen 5 shar ie eee to > ; - . - i ~ - pied é . ty aa So eel é sie a Bae Se ime Lee = ‘ z ers wna arial it ar 8 ae oe Jad ey Pak " = = a ina e as aaa ~ Seana aa aa ‘ ——— +> eek 7 7 oe ai - oe ice ~ = —— = ~ ~ ~ - - a ; i He d 4 i any 5 edie: aa i ia “f a Pei vaciaae Pate eet : i A { Ae eh ; i beny Cu i bah \ [ee eee a { a eay a | PBR ‘ Ghee beeaul ay i RGA Che | i Bee he ee) a) é ( ay cg } + f 1 570 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. back with the army to Chattanooga; thence to Chickamauga, where Sep- tember 19 and 20 it did brilliant service, losing 35 killed and 40 wounded. At Missionary Ridge it fought in reserve, and then fell slowly back to Dalton, where it wintered. On the Atlanta campaign, beginning in May, 1864. it fought at Resaca, Dallas, Kenesaw, Dead Angle, Peach Tree Creek and at Atlanta, where it lost many officers and was in numerous skirmishes. It participated in the engagements at Jonesboro, Lovejoy, Dalton and Decatur, without serious loss; and at bloody Franklin fought with great fierceness, sustaining a loss of one- fourth its men, and at Nashville suffered much amid gallant action before an overwhelming force. As Company E of the First Consolidated Ten- nessee Regiment, the Ninth marched to North Carolina, where April 26, 1865, it surrendered with forty men. The Tenth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in David- son, Montgomery and Giles Counties, and was organized at Fort Henry, in May, 1861, with Adolphus Heiman, colonel. It was disciplined at Fort’ Henry, and during the investment lost seven men killed and wounded by the bursting of a 64-pounder. At Fort Donelson, where it retreated, it was under constant and destructive musketry and artillery fire for three days, and became prisoners of war February 16, 1862. Here it earned the designation ‘‘ Bloody Tenth.” September 24 it was exchanged, and October 2 reorganized at Clinton, Miss. R. W. McGa- vock succeeded Col. Heiman, who had died. In December, in Gregg’s brigade, it helped defeat Sherman at Chickasaw Bayou. January 3 it moved to Port Hudson, where March 13, at night, it sustained a heavy bombardment by Federal gun-boats. May 7 it fought at Jackson, and May 12 brilliantly at Raymond, losing Col. McGavock. The Tenth was consolidated with the Thirtieth under Col. Turner. After the capitula- tion of Vicksburg it joined Bragg at Ringgold, and September 19 and 20 at ferce Chickamauga lost 224 men killed and wounded out of 328 engaged, a result with scarcely a parallel in the annals of war. The brig- ade was broken up on the death of Gen. Gregg, and the Tenth was trans- ferred to Tyler’s brigade. At Missionary Ridge the regiment fought hotly, being one of the last to leave the field. In May, 1864, it began the southward movement. fighting with conspicuous bravery at Rocky Face Ridge, Ringgold Gap, Buzzard Roost, Resaca, New Hope Church; Pine Mountain, Kenesaw Mountain, Peach Tree Creek. Decatur (July 22), Atlanta and Jonesboro, where Col. Grace was mortally wounded. In Hood’s campaign into Tennessee it participated in the awful charges at Franklin and the stubborn fighting at Nashville. It then moved to Bentonville, N. C., and surrendered at Greensboro.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Dye The Eleventh Tennessee (Confederate ) Regiment was raised in David- son, Humphreys, Dickson, Robertson and Hickman Counties, and was organized May 22, 1861, at Camp Cheatham, with J. E. Rains as colonel. Late in July it was ordered into East Tennessee, and in October was moved into Kentucky with Gen. Zollicoffer. At ‘‘ Wild Cat” it lost nine killed and wounded, and then guarded Cumberland Gap until the early summer of 1862. It moved south, skirmishing at Walden’s Ridge, los- ing by capture its colonel, Gordon. After sundry movements it joined Bragg at Harrodsburg, thence moved south via Knoxville to Murfrees- boro, where the Eleventh fought its first pitched battle with splendid dash and intrepidity, losing many men, among whom was Col. Gordon, severely wounded. Gen. Rains was killed on the field. After this the Eleventh was assigned to the Tennessee Brigade of Gen. Preston Smith, comprising the Twelfth, Thirteenth, Twenty-ninth, F orty-seventh and One Hundred and Fifty-fourth. It spent the summer of 1863 as Chat- tanooga, and in September participated in the bloody battie of Chicka- mauga with great bravery and severe loss. At Missionary Ridge it fought desperately, resisting the furious charges of the Federals for hours, and until flanked. Four regimental color-bearers were shot down and Maj. Green was mortally wounded. In the Atlanta campaign, in 1864, it was engaged at Resaca, Calhoun, New Hope Church, Dead Angle, Kenesaw, Peach Tree Greek, Sugar Creek and elsewhere, losing in the aggregate heavily, and in variably displaying wonderful dash and pluck. At Jonesboro it lost Col. Long. In the awful battle of Franklin and again at Nashville it bore a distinguished part. It was at Benton- ville, N. C., and April 26, 1865. surrendered at Greensboro. About the beginning of Hood’s Tennessee campaign it was consolidated with the Twenty-ninth Regiment. The Twelfth Tennessee (Confederate ) Regiment was raised in Gibson, Dyer, Carroll, Fulton and Hickman Counties, Tenn., and Graves County, Ky., and was mustered in at Jackson, May 28, 1861, R. M. Russell be- coming colonel. It was thoroughly fitted for the field at Trenton and Union City, and in September moved to Columbus, Ky., and November 7 took active part in the battle of Belmont, T. H. Bell, commanding, losing about thirty killed and wounded. Soon after the surrender ot Fort Donelson it was transferred to Corinth, and April 6 and 7 par- ticipated in the headlong victory at Shiloh with severe loss, Col. Bell receiving dangerous wounds. In May 1862, it was reorganized with Bell as colonel, and was consolidated with the Twenty -second. It was moved to Chattanooga; thence detached to Kirby Smith, at Knoxville; thence marched into Kentucky, where at Richmond it defeated the enemy Ser cpe ena a Seg a oo oS Sone eagnn hermes gee IES ; cians= TREES an Pe < ig eee tchetcangeyer Bors" ngnernea eget te Pe a hE EET Th PETE 2 aan tiie as Skin aye Hiren Sips a Sa cae Re ca, SPP” oe ag tae La RIASE not Rye atice ; — re ENN ATT LES IT BR EN Aci: aly ale a aR eee me ea ~ 3 = Se ne a 572 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. with loss. It joined Bragg at Harrodsburg, was in reserve at Perryville, returned to Knoxville and was consolidated with the Forty-seventh. It was then transferred to Murfreesboro where it bore a gallant part, leaving its gallant dead thick on the field. At Chickamauga, in September, and at Missionary Ridge, in November, it distingushed itself on the field by its impetuous charges and adamantine stands. Again in 1864 at Rocky Face Ridge, Resaca, Adairsville, New Hope Church, Kenesaw, ‘Dead Angle,” Peach Tree Oreek, Decatur and Atlanta, 1t bore its heroic part. At Jonesboro and Loyejoy Station it suffered severely, and in the dread- ful slaughter at Franklin, and in the dogged and desperate fighting at Nashville it fought with its accustomed dash and courage. It made the dark and sorrowful march to the Carolinas, participated at Bentonville and surrendered at Greensboro, N. C,, April 26, 1865, with fifty men. The Thirteenth Tennessee (Confederate ) Regiment was raised in Fay- ette, Shelby, Gibson, McNairy and Dyer Counties, Tenn,, and Marshall County, Miss., and was mustered in at Jackson June 3. 1861, J. V. Wright becoming colonel. It moved to Randolph and joined Sneed’s brigade. After occupying various stations it moved in September to Columbus, Ky., where on the 10th it was brigaded with the Twelfth and Twenty-first Regiments, under Col. Russell. November 7, at Bel- mont, it was desperately engaged driving the enemy back to his boats, but losing the enormous number of 149 killed and wounded out of 400 engaged. Soon after this A. J. Vaughn succeeded Wright as colonel. Mareh 19, 1862, it reach Corinth, and April 6 and 7 fought with des- perate valor at Shiloh, losing 112 killed and wounded. It was then re- organized and a company from LaGrange was added. arly in August it moved to Chattanooga; was detached and sent to Gen. Cleburne, at Knoxville; thence marched into Kentucky and assisted in severely de- feating the Federals at Richmond. It was in reserve at Perryville; thence moved to Murfreesboro via Knoxville and Tullahoma. At the furious battle of Murfreesboro it lost 110 killed and wounded out of 226 engaged. At Chickamauga in September, 1863, and Missionary Ridge in November, it displayed its usual desperation and valor. In the Georgia campaign it was honorably and gallantly engaged in all the prin- cipal battles to Atlanta, suffering in the aggregate severely, and in the Tennessee campaign, at Spring Hill, fierce Franklin and Nashville sus- tained further and sorrowful losses. Sadly the skeleton regiment joined Johnson’s army in North Carolina, where at Bentonville it surren- dered. The Fourteenth Tennessee (Confederate ) Regiment waraised in Mont- gomery, Robertson and Stewart Counties, and was organized at Camp| —- BATTLE OF e— “MURFREESBORO, ‘a SN For \ Wade's \ ¥ e & , S = Is Mill XY < We SS a Sal | \ | > \\ Ss oe \ Le aa > So. * Az £ \ Y sis ‘ ss Dec. 5 Ayre MSINSO e Nett % x S | Eee s 3 Ashbury Cha a $ || ir =| | 5 : | f= O & \| Sj SHrmo¢ ° \ = | | BIO ox Anrios® ys | » BRECT” WHEELER'S CAV . | S 0 i ( o COco9Dd dy» — /YOHNSON , 3S" Bg. ji agoag ase ( > ~ a | \ || | \ | | I I \ i; I \ \= ae ! CO & | | = °. ° tx. i} SS wy | ‘om Q 4% we | RESERVE c ! “WW Q i “ \N jens / RAGG’S HD.QRS || Sey We Sig ® aN | 4 cy C > | & Co 7 . SS Well ero e | ee § 2\ MURFREESBORO | 7 2 a eoot * “ee . + | lt SY 2 Tx tN Te al al 125 Sree JE) * al oF oO %% of (= | | a mi OY S| tet | f yee SF gle \|_S | el aq) a oy | ata P| © S Z, %s — a —— aE - % on Franklin Ttoad & \\é = \\e —\ 00 % DIV. Shelbyville -— | } | |Se ———————— ——————HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 573 Duncan, Clarksville, in May, 1861, under Col. W. A. Forbes. About the middle of July it was transferred to Virginia, where it was brigaded with the First and the Seventh, under Gen. S. R. Anderson. In the har- rassing Cheat Mountain expedition, it suffered intensely and was first un- der fire. During the winter of 1861-62, it participated in the campaigns around Romney, Winchester, and the bombardment of Hancock. From this date it was in all the historical movements of the Army of Northern Virginia. May 31, 1862, it fought at Seven Pines with great bravery, losing heavily. At Chickahominy, Cold Harbor, Gaines’ Mills, Maivern Hill, Frazier’s Farm and elsewhere it left its gallant dead on the bloody fields. Again at Cedar Mountain, second Manassas (where Col. Forbes was killed), Chantilly, Harper’s Ferry, Antietam, Shepardstown, Freder- icksburg and Chancellorsville (May, 1863) it bore a distinguished and honorable part, leaving its best blood on the ever memorable fields. Late in June, 1863, the army moved into Pennsylvania, where at Gettysburg, on the first day, the Fourteenth fought with desperate valor and heroic achievements, sustaining the loss of many of its best soldiers. On the 3d of July its brigade and pickets made the memorable and brilliant charge on Cemetery Ridge. This extraordinary charge has no super 10I in the annals of war. Again at Falling Waters, Bristow Station, in the bloody Wilderness, at feaeral Spottsylvania, at Cold Harbor, Petersburg, the defenses of Richmond and elsewhere, it sustained its heroic record. In April, 1865, the remnant of this war-scarred regiment laid down its dripping arms at Appomattcx The Fifteenth Tennessee (Confederate ) Regiment was raised mainly in Shelby County and at McKenzie, and was organized at Jackson June 7. 1861, under Col. Charles M. Carroll. Later sever: al companies with- drew and were succeeded by others from Shelby County and Paducah, Ky. After occupying various positions it finally Dee in the bat- tle of Belmont,- where it suffered slight loss. In March, 1862, it moved south from Columbus, Ky., and Analy, April 6 and 7, from ate Sta- tion, near Corinth, fought in the bloody battle of Shiloh where it lost the fearful number of nearly 200 killed and wounded, receiving high praise for its dash and daring. It then retur ned to Tupelo where it was reor- ganized, and later was moved via Chattanooga northwé ard on the Ken- tucky campaign, fighting in the severe contest of Perryville, where in a hand-to-hand encounter it assisted in capturing a stone wall. It moved south via Knoxville to Murfreesboro, in which battle it further distin- guished itself. Later it was consolidated with the Thirty-seventh Regi- ment, Tyler of the Fifteenth taking command, which occasioned much 5 > ay ill-feeling during the remainder of the war. It moved back to Chatta- 36 San a nw nn gl ——a ere ——— SE ir inane lama ate 2 iemnrata eames 574 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. nooga, thence to Chickamauga, where in September, 1863, it was hotly ence to Missionary Ridge in November, sustaining in both It followed the fortunes of the Georgia campaign, es with splendid courage and severe loss. engaged, th actions: heavy loss. fightmeg in all the principal battl (in Hood’s unfortunate campaign into Tennessee, it engaged fiercely in the actions of Franklin and Nashv ille, and finally marched to North Caro- lina, where it surrendered. The Sixteenth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised mainly on the Cumberland Table-land, in and around Putnam County, and was mus- tered in June 9 at Camp Trousdale, Sumner County, with John H.. Say- Late in July it moved to Virginia, where it was brigaded The first severe hardship and the It participated In December, age, colonel. with the Kighth under Gen. Donelson. first engagement was on the Cheat Mountain expedition. in the harrassing expedition to Little Sewell Mountain. 1861. it was transferred to Port Royal, opposite Beaufort Island, where it cli valuable guard duty until after Shiloh, when it reported at Corinth and joined Bragg’s campaign into Kentucky, where at Perryville it fought ts first severe battle with great pluck and intrepidity. It then returned and participated g gallantly in the precipitous charges at Murfreesboro. It then moved south and in September fought with conspicuous courage at dreadful Chickamauga, and later sustained for hours the shock of the Federal Army at Missionary Ridge, losing heavily in both actions. In 1864, on the Georgia cz ampaign, it fought at Rocky Face Ridge, Kenesaw, Resaca. Peach Tree Creek and around Atlanta, losing many in the aggre- gate and sustaining its fine record. Again at Jonesboro, and at that hottest battle of the civil war—Franklin—and again at Nashville, it poured the blood of its bravest on the ensanguined fields. With heavy hearts the skeleton remnant of the gallant Sixteenth marched down to North Carolina where it finally surrendered. The Seventeenth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in Bedford. Marshall, Franklin, Jackson and Putnam Counties, and with T. W. Newman, colonel, was mustered in May 5, 1861. It was disciplined at Camp Trousdale and late in July was transferred to Virginia, but in Au- gust returned to Hast Tennessee. It joined Zollicoffer’s Kentucky cam- : paign and at the battle of Rock Castle in half an hour lost 11 killed and 27 wounded. Again it participated in the battle of Fishing Creek (where Gen. Zollicoffer was killed), with the loss of 10 killed and 36 wounded. February 19, 1862, it reached Murfreesboro; thence moved to northern Mississippi, where it participated in the siege of Corinth. In May, T. ©. H. Miller became colonel, but was soon succeeded by Albert S. Marks. It was transferred to Chattanooga early in August, and in SeptemberHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. It —~] OU moved into Kentucky with Bragg, fighting stubbornly at Perryville; thence moved south with the army and December 31 was engaged with magnificent courage at Murfreesboro, losing the extraordinary number of 246 killed and wounded. Later it was engaged at Hoover’s Gap, and in September, 1863, at the fearful contest of Chickamauga lost 145 killed and wounded. It soon moved north with Longstreet against Knoxville; assisted in the assault on Fort Loudon; lost 10 men killed and wounded at Bean’s Station; and passed the winter of 1863-64 in East Tennessee, suffering incredibly. In May, 1864, it moved to Petersburg, Va., and assaulted the enemy at Drury Bluff May 16, losing 12 killed and 50 wounded. It fought in numerous skirmishes around Richmond, and February 5, 1865, sustained considerable loss at Hatcher’s Run. April 2 it fought its last battle on the defenses of Petersburg, losing severely, over halfits men being captured. It surrendered at Appomattox April 9. The Highteenth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was formed at Camp Trousdale June 11, 1861, of companies from Rutherford, Bedford, Davidson, Wilson, Cannon, Sumner and Cheatham Counties, with J. B. Palmer, colonel. September 17 it moved to Bowling Green, Ky., and February 8, 1862, advanced to the relief of Fort Donelson. At the siege two companies of the Eighteenth were the first to engage the enemy. After hard fighting the regiment was surrendered February 16. After about six months it was exchanged and was reorganized at Jackson, Miss., with Palmer as colonel. It was soon transferred to Knoxville to invade Kentucky, but instead was moved to Murfreesboro and brigaded with the Twenty-sixth and the Thirty-second Regiments and others, which last were soon replaced with the Forty-fiftth Tennessee. At Mur- freesboro it participated in one of the most famous and brilliant charges of history with severe loss. Col. Palmer received three wounds. In September, 1863, at Chickamauga, it distinguished itself by its furious fighting and desperate losses. Col. Palmer was again dangerously wounded. Again at Missionary Ridge it fought with its accustomed gal- lantry and loss. It wintered at Dalton, and, in 1864, resisted the advance of the enemy on numerous bloody fields on the way to Atlanta. Palmer was commissioned brigadier-general and given a brigade of the Third, Highteenth, Thirty-second and Forty-fifth Regiments. W. R. Butler be- came colonel of the Eighteenth. In a heroic encounter at Atlanta against vastly superior numbers the regiment was outflanked and a majority of its members captured. The regiment was consolidated with the Third under Col. Butler. It fought at Jonesboro and moved north, reaching Franklin too late for the battle; was detached to aid Forrest, and engaged the enemy near Murfreesboro and elsewhere; and after Hood’s defeat at a re as ees See _ontuisbaseenen nieintipresaoironbhation 2 a eg oF ag ay leg Al pc GS mare ac a Oe hore on ie i arall Ulaadaiae 576 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Nashville moved to the Carolinas where it fought at Bentonville and sur- rendered at Greensboro. The Nineteenth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in Knox, Polk, Rhea, Hawkins, Washington and Sullivan Coun- anized in May, 1861, at Knoxville, with David M. Cum- mings, colonel. It was first distributed over Hast Tennessee to do guard duty, and about July 1 was united and stationed at Cumberland Gap. It marched north on the Kentucky campaign; lost one man killed at Bar- boursville; was in reserve at “Wild Cat;’ fought bravely at Fishing Creek, losing about fifteen killed and wounded. Afterward terrible pri- vations and sufferings were endured. It moved to Murfreesboro in Feb- ruary, 1862; thence to northern Mississippi; thence to Shiloh, where: April 6 and 7 it was furiously engaged in the awtul assaults on the ‘“‘Hor- net’s Nest,” losing over 100 killed and wounded, and assisted in the cap- ture of Prentiss’ division. It was then reorganized and moved to Vicks- burg, where, in the swamps, it suffered terribly from disease, and later fought at Baton Rouge. It then moved north and joined Bragg’s army and participated in the sweeping Confederate victory at Murfreesboro losing over 125 killed and wounded. It moved south and in September, 1863, at Chickamauga, fought with magnificent bravery, losing over one- third of those engaged. Again at Missionary Ridge, in November, it was: Hamilton, ties, and was org hotly and stubbornly engaged, sustaining severe loss. In 1864, from Dalton to Atlanta, in all the bloody battles of that memorable campaign, it fought with conspicuous daring and sorrowful losses. Among the slain was the beloved Col. Walker. It did its duty at Jonesboro and Lovejoy, and in the awful assault at Franklin shed its best blood without stint all over the stricken field. It fought at Nashville, retreated sorrow- fully south, skirmishing at Sugar Creek and Pulaski. It fought its last battle at Bentonville, and surrendered at High Point, N. C., with sixty- four men. The Twentieth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in Davidson, Williamson, Rutherford, Sumner, Perry and Smith Counties, and was organized at Camp Trousdale in June, 1861, with Joel A. Bat- tle, colonel. Late in July it was ordered to Virginia, but returned after reaching Bristol, and marched north with Zollicoffer on the Kentucky campaign, skirmishing at Barboursville, participating in the action at “Wild Cat,” fighting furiously at Fishing Creek, losing 33 killed on the field and about 100 wounded. It then moved to northern Mis- sissippi and in April participated with splendid valor in the brilliant Confederate success at Shiloh, losing 187 men killed and wounded. The regiment was then reorganized, moved to Vicksburg, participated in theHISTORY OF TENNESSEE, Ct —l ~] movement there, fought at Baton Rouge, thence marched to Murfrees- boro, in which memorable battle it was hotly and furiously engaged, sus- taining a loss of 178 killed and wounded of 350 engaged. Later it fought desperately a ut Hoover’s Gap, losing 45 killed and wounded. At bloody Chickamauga the Twentieth displayed wonderful dash and pluck, losing 98 killed and wounded of 140 engaged. At Missionary Ridge it fought brilliantly and retreated in good order. It wintered at Dalton and in 1864, in the famous Georgia campaign, fought with splendid courage at Resaca, Dalton, New Hope Church, Pine Mountain, Kenesaw, Peach Tree Greek. Jonesboro and the actions around Atlanta, losing heavily in the aggregate, Again at Franklin, in those awful assaults in the flaming teeth of death, it displayed heroic valor and suffered desperate loss. It bore its gallant but sorrowful part at Nashville and sadly retreated, marching to the Carolinas to almost literally ‘die in the last ditch.” At Greensboro, N. C., thirty-four sad men surrendered and returned to blighted homes to roe the ravages of wa The Twenty-first Tennessee Rae ) Regiment was raised in Shelby and Hardeman Counties about the last of April, 1861, and was soon organized with Ed. Pickett, colonel. It reported first to Gen. Cheat- ham at ‘Winton City, and later moy ed up to Ce Ky. It partici- pated in the sharp action at Belmont, November 7, then moved back to Columbus and to Union City where it ee a short period; then moved southward and finally participated 1 in the furious battle of Shiloh, and later was consolidated with the Second Regiment to form the Fitth Confederate Regimert. The Twenty-second Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in the counties of Gibson, Carroll, Dyer, Hardeman and in Kentucky and Louisiana, and was organized at Trenton about July 1, 1861, w ith Thom- as J. Freeman, eel It operated in West Tennessee and in the movement which culminated 1 in the battle of Belmont, November 7, where it fought and lost about sev enty-five killed and wounded. It returned south with the army and located near Corinth. It fought at Shiloh, los- ing nearly one- half of those engaged, and displayed great gallantry on the field, Col. Freeman being w founded. It then moyed back to Corinth, where it was re-organized and consolidated with the Twelfth Regiment . and thenceforward lost its identity. Col. Freeman served the one year of enlistment. The consolidation was commanded by Col. Bell, who be- came a brigadier under Forrest. Col. Freeman, at Shiloh, received the surrender of Gen. Prentiss, who handed him his sword. The Twenty-third Tennessee (Confederate ) Regiment was raised in Bedford, Marshall, Rutherford and other counties of Middle Tennessee, ae — pan ——————— — SS anna aaa Sanaa aeass ; ‘s zete. TE ams = . a ae HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. and was organized about the middle of July, 1861, with R. H. Keeble, colonel. It saw its first service in Virginia, and participated in the en- gagement at Drury’s Bluff, with a loss of fifteen or twenty killed and wounded. After various movements it was engaged in the brilliant and furious battle of Shiloh, where it lost severely. It moved north with Bragg and fought at Perryville, then turned south and participated at Murfreesboro. after which it continued with the Army of the Tennessee during the remainder of the war. At Chickamauga it lost heavily. It was at Missionary Ridge and in the famous Georgia campaign, after which it marched back with Hood into Tennessee, and participated at Franklin and Nashville, then moved to North Carolina where it surrendered. At Murfreesboro it was in Johnson’s brigade of Cleburne’s division. The Twenty-fourth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was organized in June, 1861, at Camp Anderson, near Murfreesboro, and comprised twelve companies raised in the counties of Williamson, Rutherford, Maury, Bedford, Coffee, Smith, DeKalb, Sumner, Hickman and Perry. It was first commanded by Col. R. D. Allison, and later by Col. Bratton and Col. John Wilson. It moved into Kentucky and was stationed at Cave City in October. At this time it was in Col. Shaver’s brigade of Hardee’s division. Jt was in Gen. Strahl’s brigade during the most of the war. It participated in the pitched battle of Shiloh, losing many, and was reorganized at or near Corinth; thence moved via Chattanooga on the Kentucky campaign, and was severely engaged at Perryville. It then retreated with Bragg’s army, and on December 31, 1862, partic- ipated in the splendid charge at Murfreesboro, losing again heavily. It moved south, and in September, 1863, was hotly engaged at bloody Chickamauga, and later participated at Missionary Ridge. In 1864 it was in all the leading engagements in the famous Georgia campaign, and in the aggregate lost heavily. It moved with Hood’s army to Jonesboro; thence to Tennessee, where it participated at Franklin and Nashville; thence moved to North Carolina, and in the spring of 1865 surrendered at Greensboro. The Twenty-fiftth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in Overton, White, Putnam and Jackson Counties, and was organized at Camp Zollicoffer, near Livingston, early in June, 1861, with S. S. Stan- ton, colonel. After several months of discipline it invaded Kentucky to break up organizations of Federal home guards, and in January, 1862, joined Gen. Zollicoffer at Mill Springs, Ky., and was engaged in the bat- tle of Fishing Creek, suffering considerable loss and displaying great dash and pluck. It then moved to Murfreesboro, thence to northern Mississippi, where it did important provost duty, aud after Shiloh wasHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. CS Or reorganized, with Stanton, colonel, who was soon succeeded by John M. Hughes. It marched to Chattanooga, thence north on Brage’s Ken- tucky campaign; fought bravely at Perryville, with loss; thence marched to Murfreesboro, in which headlong battle 1t displayed magnificent fight- ing qualities and lost heavily in killed and wounded. It participated at Fairfield, Beach Grove and Hoovyer’s Gap, losing heavily at the latter battle. At the fierce battle of Chickamauga it distinguished itself, cap- turing valuable ordnance and sweeping desperately everything from its course. It then moved with Longstreet against Knoxville, fighting at Fort Loudon, Bean’s Station (twice), Clinch Valley and Fort Sanders, suffering severe loss. It passed a winter of intense suffering among the mountains of East Tennessee, and in February, 1864, moved to near Richmond, Va. It fought desperately at Drury Bluff and in numerous engagements around Petersburg and Richmond, displaying its habitual brilliancy, and was finally surrendered at Appomattox. The Twenty-sixth Tennessee (Confederate ) Regiment was raised in Washington, Sullivan, Meigs, Cocke, Grainger, Rhea, Hamilton, Knox and Roane Counties, and was organized at Camp Lillard, Knoxville, September 6, 1861, with John M. Lillard, colonel. Late in September it moved to Bowling Green; thence later to Russellville, Ky., and early Here it did its first gallant fighting, amid severe loss and heroic personal achievements. It was in February to the relief of Fort Donelson. captured, taken to Northern prisons, and exchanged at Vicksburg in Sep- tember, 1862. moved west, and in December, at brilliant Murfreesboro, fought in the It was reorganized at Knoxville, with Lillard, colonel, furious charges of that famous battle. It moved south, and at Chicka- mauga fought with fiery energy, losing heavily, Col. Lillard falling mor- It also did meritorious and bloody work at Missionary Ridge, passed the winter of 1863-64 in northern Georgia, and fought brilliantly in all the leading tally wounded. R. M. Saffell sueceeded him in command. engagements down to Atlanta, suffering severe loss. At Jonesboro and Lovejoy, and in the Tennessee campaign at bloody Franklin and stubborn Nashville, it displayed its accustomed dash and valor. It retreated south, and at Bentonville, N. C., lost Col. Gaffell, whose successor on the field, Gol. A. F. Boggess, fell in the same fight. dered in April, 1865. The Twenty-seventh Tennessee (Confederate ) Regiment was raised in Benton, Obion, McNairy, Haywood, Weakley, Carroll, Decatur and Henderson Counties, and was organized at Trenton, late in July, 1861, with ©. H. Williams, colonel. It occupied Camp of Instruction until after the battle of Belmont; then moved to Columbus, Ky., and later to Bowling The regiment surren- => renner ene een ten a rst are Ae pilblana a ROT ge eae mir pens Eng Seay eee eae iinet apogee neernlinciea nia more er ee ee ereSe tt a Se 980 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Green. Early in February, 1862, it moved to Nashville; then to Mur- HH at. Shiloh, losing over 100 killed and wounded. It was transferred to HH Chattanooga, and then moved north on the Kentucky campaign. Octo- 1 ) i. Ss : ee ° AR ber 8. at Perryville, it left the bloody field proud of its splendid conduct. | * . . . / a aie = - r a * - y Hh freesboro, then to northern Mississippi. In April it fought desperately — an A+ Murfreesboro, in December, it assisted in the furious charges which swept the right wing of the Federals back seve ral miles. At Chicka- mauga it fought with superb courage, forcing the enemy back at every Chee = < 5D re } Cc ry or ni point, and at Missionary Ridge held its ground long against overwhelm- 5 ii ine numbers. In the Georgia campaign of 1864 it fought with its usual ei | brilliancy in all the leading engagements on the retrograde movement to Atlanta. A north on the ill-fated Tennessee campaign. In the furious and brilliant penne nee et ee pis ain at Jonesboro and Lovejoy it participated and marched (ey oO — ae —s — oak aS=s = x = OT i TN are Tg eT ae ne me oa a a side I a eg REN e Soman te Cae charges at Franklin the gallant regiment steadily carried its streaming banner across the bloody field, losing nearly half of those engaged. In the stubborn contest for its capital city it bore a heroic part, but was overwhelmed and swept back, and then sadly marched down to the Caro- linas, where at Bentonville it fought its last battle. It surrendered in it oO | April, 1865. Phil t 4 . e . . The Twenty-eighth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in Wilson, Putnam, Jackson, White and Smith Counties, and was organized at Camp Zollicoffer, Overton County, in August, 1861, with John P. | Murray, colonel. Atter destroying Federal supplies the regiment joined a aii} Gen. Zollicoffer and fought at Fishing Creek with the loss of 10 men. | | {t then moved south to northern Mississippi, and in April, 1862, partici- pated in the brilhant movements at Shiloh, with the loss of over 100 of its | best men. It then moved south and finally fought at Baton Rouge and Port Hudson, displaying brilliant and meritorious courage. It then joined Brage’s campaign to Kentucky, and fought at Perryville; then i moved south and engaged the enemy in the brilliant charge at Murfrees- , boro. It was reorganized with S. S. Stanton, colonel, and consolidated | H | with the Eighty-fourth. At Chickamauga it fought its hardest and erand- We est battle, losing 230 killed and wounded, and covering itself with im- Hh perishable glory. It skirmished around Chattanooga and did guard hi 7 : ray 1 r i T 2 : : : : Hh duty in Kast Tennessee. In the Georgia campaign it was engaged in all the principal contests, losing heavily, and in Hood’s Tennessee campaign | distinguished itself for courage and hardihood, displaying rare daring ih - and valor on Franklin’s bloody field. After the battle of Nashville it | moved south, and after Bentonville was surrendered in North Carolina. 1 i) | | The Twenty-ninth Tennessee ( Confederate ) Regiment was composed | ih HI of companies from Greene, Bradley, Hawkins, Polk, Claiborne, HancockHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. OSL Re and Washington Counties, and was organized at Henderson’s Mills, Greene County, in July, 1861, with Samuel Powell, colonel. It did He guard duty in East Tennessee until December, and then joined Zolli- ne coffer at Mill Springs, and January 19 met the enemy at the battle of ay ‘ishing Creek, where Col. Powell was permanently disabled. It marched to northern Mississippi via Murfreesboro, and remained at Luka during | the battle of Shiloh. It skirmished around Corinth, moved to @hattan he nooga; thence north on the Kentucky campaign, being commanded by Horace Rice, who had succeeded Arnold, met the enemy at Perryville; thence marched to Murfreesboro, where it exhibited splendid intrepidity and courage, losing 36 killed on the field and 136 wounded. At @hickae | | : -mauga it was held much in reserve, but lost, killed and wounded 32. ii At Missionary Ridge it did gallant work and was complimented on the | MN field by Gens. Cheatham and Hardee. In 1864 at Dalton, Rocky Face Hii Ridge, Resaca, Kenesaw Mountain, Peach Tree Creek and around Atlanta it was prominently engaged. It participated at Jonesboro and Lovejoy ; NHR and in Hood’s Tennessee campaign at Franklin its gallant action was | surpassed by no other regiment, its dead and wounded lying scattered over its bloody path. It fought at Nashville, retreated south with the army, and fought late in the day at Bentonville. It surrendered at Greensboro April 26. | The Thirtieth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in - i i Davidson, Sumner, Robertson and Smith Counties, and was organized | | early in October with J. W. Head, colonel. In November it moved to il Fort Donelson, and February 13 to 16 was prominently engaged and was | | surrendered on the 16th and taken to Northern prisons. They were ex- changed the following July, were reorganized at Camp Jackson with ay J. Turner as colonel, moved to Holly Springs, thence to Grenada, thence to Vicksburg, fought bravely at Chickasaw Bayou, doing the enemy great damage. It then moved to Port Hudson, thence to Jackson. At Raymond May 12, 1863, the regiment fought with great skill and desper- ation against superior numbers, losing about seventy-five killed and wounded, and then retreated to Jackson. After various movements it participated, September 19 and 20, at the fearful contest at Chickamauga, displaying wonderful dash and staying qualities, and losing killed and bie wounded about half of those engaged. At Missionary Ridge it was hot- ly and gallantly engaged, losing severely. Winter was passed at Dalton. Le | In 1864, from Dalton to Jonesboro, in all the bloody principal engage- | ments, the Thirtieth sustained its high honor and courage and in the ag- gregate lost many splendid men. At Jonesboro the regiment in heroic | action lost one-third of itstroops. In the unfortunate campaign of Gen. eg, a parte parla en re Oe. a ——— Feet nnes een cee panes Seinen ei — —— ag ORS SLT LCL TTT aon 582 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. _) tad ssee the regiment participated at Murfreesboro, Frank- distinguishing itself in the bloody art of war. as to fight its last battle at Bentonville Hood into Tenne lin and Nashville further | Tt marched down to the Carolin | and surrendered April 206. | | The Thirty-first Tennessee ( Confederate, West Tennessee ) Regiment was raised in Weakley, Haywood, Madison, McNairy and Decatur iN Counties, and was organized during the summer of 1861! with. A: He | Bradford, colonel, and November 29 marched for Columbus, Ky., where it remained until the surrender of Fort Donelson in February, 1862; | thence moved to Tiptonville, thence to Fort Pillow, and, after the battle | of Shiloh, to Corinth. Later it was moved to Chattanooga, and then | moved north campaigning through Kentucky with Bragg. At Perryville the regiment had its first heavy engagement, displaying great gallantry and losing many valuable soldiers. Egbert E. Tansil succeeded Brad- It marched south with the army and December 31 recreate a kp | ford as_ colonel. fought with conspicuous courage at Murfreesboro, and retreated south with the army, and in September, 1863, fought in the awful battle of Chickamauga, losing nearly half its men. In 1864, in the Georgia all the principal battles, losing Hi campaign, it was engaged in nearly r « oo - - ~ * Hig anos a fo ange -— eae: ees eo a acne ampere aos oan ny ane Peep aeipeinieeepanecmee nee ~ ; Se Hi September, 1863, the regiment was exchanged and late in that year was | transformed into cavalry, and as such brigaded under Gen. Vaughn. It | did service in East Tennessee, recruited in North Carolina, part was sent to Virginia and while there fought at Kernstown, Martinsburgh, wn Hagerstown, Winchester, Piedmont and elsewhere, losing heavily. Hl Later the united regiment was engaged at Marion, Saltville, Morristown, | Bull’s Gap, Greeneville and elsewhere. Marching to join Lee in the | spring of 1865, it was learned that he had surrendered and Gen. Echols | I disbanded his command, but this regiment with others refused, and marched to North Carolina and joined President Davis, and was his He ! | heavily in the aggregate. In the Tennessee campaign of Hood it fought z i t i at Franklin, losing over halt the number engaged. Col. Stafford was me i i killed on the enemy’s line, to which he had penetrated. Again it fought a fi ‘al i at Nashville, thence moved to North Carolina, where it surrendered. it i i I Hl The Thirty-frst Tennessee ( Crea Tennessee ) Regiment ‘ ite 4 ea) \ was raised in Jefferson, Blouns and no Counties, and was organized . A HN | March 28, 1862, with W. M. Bradford, colonel, and was reorganized 1 a Ht i | Hi May 8. It did guard duty in Kast Tennessee and at Cumberlanel Gap, i CT a joined Bragg at Harrodsburg after the battle of Perryville, and late in i Hell i) | i! December moved to Vicksburg, in the vicinity of which 1t participated in (a RET EE numerous expeditions and skirmishes, and in the siege of that city where ; PAE HT P| the soldiers were almost starved to death and finally captured. InHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 583. escort when all were captured. The regiment was paroled at Wash- ington, Ga. The Thirty-second Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in Giles, Lawrence, Williamson, Lincoln, Marshall and Franklin Counties, and was organized at Camp Trousdale during the summer of 1561 with Edmund E. Cook, colonel. About September it was moved to East Ten- nessee, where it did patrol duty around Chattanooga and Bridgeport, Ala. Late in December it moved to Bowling Green, Ky., thence in February, 1862, to Russellville; thence to Clarksville, and thence to Fort Donelson, where from the 13th to the 16th of February it partici- pated in all the daring movements of the siege with severe loss, and was captured with the fort. After about six months the regiment was ex- changed at Vicksburg. It was reorganized about October 1, with KH. Cook, colonel, and moved to Murfreesboro via Knoxville, and during the battle was posted at Wartrace. Tt wintered at Tullahoma, endured ‘a terrible forced march in June, moved to Chattanooga with Bragg in J uly, and fought with superb courage and coolness in the awful conflict. at Chickamauga with heavy loss. Again it was engaged at Lookout Moun- tain, and in November at Missionary Ridge, where it fought with its accustomed gallantry. It wintered at Dalton, and in 1864 participated in the famous Georgia campaign, fighting in all the leading battles down to Atlanta with heavy loss in the agg cregate. It fought desperately and with grievous loss at Jonesboro, and marched north to invade Ten- nessee under Hood, but reached bloody Franklin too late for the battle. It participated in the action at Nashville, retreated south skirmishing on the way, fought its last battle at Bentonville, N. C. and surrendered with Gen. Johnston. The Thirty-third Tennessee ( Weakley, Obion, Madison and other counties, and was organized at Union City October 18, 1861, with A. W. Campbell, colonel. In January, 1862 it marched to Columbus, Ky., where it wintered; then moved south into Confederate) Regiment was raised in northern Mississippi, and in April met the enemy on the furious field of Shiloh, and attested its courage in its desperate charges and its loss of nearly 200 men killed and wounded out of about 500 engaged. The reg- iment moved back to Corinth, and later, via Chattanooga, invaded Ken- tucky under Gen. Bragg, and at Perryville, in October, fought with mag- nificent bravery, suffering heavy losses. After this it moved south with Bragg, and at Murfreesboro bore an honorable part, losing many noble men. At Chickamauga it assisted in the awful charges which beat back the Federal hosts. It fought at Missionary Ridge and retreated south, wintering at Dalton, and in 1864 participated in the series of bloody. and. ——————— ep ES EIT OTE ETI OT NT A pens ESS PO eeai ae oe bs Pama aera ag ancy ie aaa as peemtos eats pee mee * aoe mates oe: = Acne eaten psoas eed Se ee ¥ oenece AS hing Set age PEE a a a J” RR Oe iS To ee > name : See 2 eT ES - aera eee eee = - ee ee ee ee as wren etn cm Oe Tap SS “= Soe onion zi OEE a =v ee nis Rathi 45 er <1 y Dy - y ; = ne at Es ee er eee FS ee Ss 5 > <= etait Sern cmon. win TES a a ot “5 ee . Soper : 2 zi ee ae ae . oa a oe ee “ane Seole ros te ten oes Sap as aera on ae = en ane pnmnpesnennmnancr palette aroma es St i aa = a aay oy cS ae ata chee Patt ae ih org ee Se ——= - : Sep Sah ta ert te i. : = SS = = a eae 584 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. memorable battles from that point to Atlanta, shedding the blood of its bravest bovs in defense of the cause which to them seemed right. It marched north with Hood; was at Franklin and Nashville; thence marched south, and finally surrendered in North Carolina in April, 1865. The Thirty-fourth Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised part- ly in Middle Tennessee and partly in Hast Tennessee, and was organized during the autumn of 1861, with William Churchwell, colonel. It frst saw service in Kast Tennessee, where it remained for a considerable period engaged in outpost duty. It finally participated in the Kentucky campaign, and later joined the army of Bragg in time for the battle of Murfreesboro, in which desperate engagement it was conspicuously act- ive, losing severely in killed and wounded. It moved south with the re- treating army, and after various movements was engaged in the bloody battle of Chickamauga, in September, 1863, where it behaved gallantly and lost severely. In 1864 it participated in the actions of the Georgia campaign, terminating at Atlanta, and then moved back into ‘’ennessee with Hood, taking part in his bloody battles. It then moved south with the army, and finally surrendered in North Carolina. The Thirty-fifth T’ennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in Grundy, Sequatchie, Warren, Cannon, Bledsoe and Van Buren, and was organizéd in the autumn of 1861, with B. J. Hill, colonel. About the first of the year 1863 it moved to Bowling Green, Ky., and after the sur- render of Fort Donelson marched south with the army to northern Mis- sissippi, and early in April participated in the battle of Shiloh, with heavy loss. Its charges were brilliant, sweeping and destructive. It then skirmished around Corinth, fighting with heroic desperation at Shelton Hill amid a terrible fire. It was complimented for this in gen- eral orders by Gen. Beauregard. It moved with Bragg on the Ken- tucky campaign, meeting the enemy again at Richmond and Perryville, displaying its usual heroism. At Murfreesboro it was hotly engaged, suffering severely, and again, in September, 1863, at brilliant Chicka- mauga sustained itself with distinguished valor. It did important pro- vost or guard duty throughout northern Alabama, and finally surrendered at Chattanooga in the spring of 1865. The Thirty-sixth, Thirty-ninth and Fortieth Tennessee Regiments were only partly organized, and in the main saw detached duty. ‘The’ first was commanded by Col. Morgan, the second by Col. Avery. The last was at Fort Pillow in January, 1862. Col. Avery was at Bowling Green in December, 1861, and Col. Morgan at Cumberland Gap in March, 1862. The Thirty-seventh Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in Hamilton, Jefferson, Grainger, Blount, Sevier, Claiborne, Coffee andHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 585 Washington Counties, in northern Georgia and in Alabama, and was or- ganized in October, 1861, at Camp Ramsey, near Knoxville, with W. H. Carroll, colonel. At Germantown, West Tennessee, to which point it was transferred, it drilled for about a month. In November it moved to Chattanooga. It marched north and was present at the battle of Fish- ing Creek, but did not participate in the main battle, losing only five or six killed and wounded. It then moved south via Murfreesboro to north- ern Mississipi, and occupied Burnsville during the battle of Shiloh. The regiment did valuable picket service around Corinth. In July it moved to Mobile, Montgomery, Atlanta, Dalton, Chickamauga Station, Chattanooga, and thence on the Kentucky campaign, and October 8, at Perryville, was hotly engaged. It then marched south, and in October reached Murfeesboro, where, December 31, it was engaged in that battle in the hottest part, losing about half its members killed and wounded. It then moved to Chattanooga. The following June it was consolidated with the Fifteenth under the latter name, and so lost its old existence. The Thirty-eighth Tennessee Confederate Regiment was raised in Madison, Fayette, Shelby and other West Tennessee counties, in Wilson County, and in Georgia and Alabama, and was organized in September, 1861, with Robert F. Looney, of Memphis, colonel. It moved first to Chattanooga, thence later to Knoxville, where it was stationed at the date of the battle of Fishing Creek, Kentucky, having no arms with which to assist Gen. Zollicoffer. It was finally ordered to Iuka, Miss., thence to Eastport, thence to Corinth, and was brigaded first with Gen. Gladden, and later with Gen. Preston Pond, with Louisiana troops. It moved up and fought at Shiloh, losing ninety killed and wounded. It moved with Bragg to Perryville, where it fought, and was soon after re- organized, with John G. Carter, colonel. It moved back and fought at Murfreesboro; thence marched down to Chickamauga, where it distin- guished itself. It was at Missionary Ridge, and in 1864 engaged in the Georgia campaign with heavy loss. It came north with Hood, fought at Franklin, where Gen. Carter was killed, and at Nashville, then marched south, and in 1865 surrendered in North Carolina. The Forty-first Tennessee ( Confederate ) Regiment was raised in Frank- lin, ‘Lincoln, Bedford and Marshall Counties, and was organized at Camp Trousdale in November, 1861, with Robert Farquharson, colonel. In December it moved to Bowling Green; thence to Fort Donelson, where it fought gallantly and was captured by the enemy. In September, 1862, it was exchanged at Vicksburg, and was reorganized with Farquharson colonel. After various expeditions the regiment was transferred, in Jan- uary, 1863, to Port Hudson. In May it moved north, where, at Ray- ae - ee eg i FE RS EE I EE TE ROLLER eres a et elPT Sha nea ee rr ae ™ ge ees > E IE : ne ieaGZ RASS aes SO CTE SO NEST Ne Fe herria Oh : ee ae aS -. " a ‘= ad Oe aca Ee RAN | HET _ Ds Sales eee Sr a : = enrages ae for nme = = Se ee yas so nm = ~——= ee aw j ‘DS6 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. mond, it met the enemy in a sharp battle, and afterward in that vicinity and around Jackson participated in several severe fights and numerous skirmishes. It was at Yazoo City when Vicksburg surrendered. Harly in September .it marched east to Chickamauga, and was in the hottest part of that gigantic and desperate battle. Many of its bravest were stretched dead upon the field. It wintered near Dalton, and in 1864, in the Georgia campaign, was engaged in all the principal engagements down to Atlanta, fighting gallantly and losing heavily. At Jonesboro it also fought, and on the Tennessee campaign at Franklin was not surpassed in desperate fighting by any other regiment. It finally surrendered in North Carolina. During the war it lost more men on picket duty than in battle. The Forty-second Tennessee Confederate Regiment was raised under the first call in Cheatham, Montgomery and other counties, and five com- panies in Alabama, and was organized about the 1st of October, 1861, with Wear in February reached Fort Donelson just in time for the battle, in which Quarles, colonel. It occupied Camps Cheatham and Sevier, and it distinguished itself and lost severely. It was captured, and in Sep- tember, 1862, was exchanged at Vicksburg, and soon reorganized at Clin- ton, Miss. West Tennessee took the place of the five Alabama companies. In March, 1863, I. N. Hulme became colonel, vice Quarles promoted. It participated in various movements in Mississippi before the surrender of Quarles was re-elected colonel. Here five companies from Vicksburg and during the seige. It then moved on sundry expeditions, and in 1864 joined the campaign through Georgia, and was engaged at New Hope Church, Pine Mountain, Kenesaw, Smyrna Depot, Peach Tree Creek, Atlanta and Lick Skillet road, losing in the aggregate heavily. In Hood’s bloody campaign the regiment at Franklin, in those awful as- saults, left about half its numbers killed and wounded upon the field. This was its most desperate battle, and here it exhibited superb courage. It participated in the stubborn contest at Nashville, and moved south with the army, and finally surrendered in North Carolina in April, 1865. The Forty-third Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was raised in the counties of Hamilton, Rhea, Meigs, Polk, Bledsoe, Jefferson, Roane, Bradley, Hawkins and McMinn, and was crganized in November, 1861, with J. W. Gillespie, colonel. Its first service was guard duty in Hast Tennessee until the reorganization in May, 1862. After various move- ments and thorough drill at Charleston, it was, in August, sent to Hum- phrey Marshall’s brigade in Virginia. It soon afterward joined Brage’s Kentucky campaign, but was in no noteworthy engagement. In Decem- ber it was transferred to Vicksburg and was subjected to hard service,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 587 and in May, 1863, moved to Port Gibson to oppose Grant’s advance. It fought at Champion Hill and covered the retreat to Vicksburg. It fought often during the siege, always with dash and daring, losing heav- ily in the ageregate. It surrendered early in July, and was soon ex- changed and was ordered to re-enforce Longstreet, who was beseiging Knoxville. During the winter the regiment was mounted, and in the spring ot 1864 did outpost duty im East Tennessee, skirmishing often and losing severely. It was engaged at Piedmont, losing several men. In Virginia it was often engaged, moving with Early around Washing- ton and fighting at Winchester, Monocacy, Cedar Creek, Fisherville, White Post, Kernstown, Darksville and Martinsburg. In the fall of 1864 it returned to East Tennessee. It fought at Morristown, losing heavily; raided Busselville with success; during the winter it did out- post duty. In the spring it learned of Lee’s surrender and then moved south to join Johnson, but at Charlotte met President Davis and served as his escort until his capture. It was paroled in May, 1865. The Forty-fourth Tennessee (Confederate ) Regiment was raised in Bedford, Grundy, Lincoln, Franklin and Coffee Counties, and was organ- ized at Camp Trousdale in December, 1861, with Cc. A. McDaniel, colonel. It soon moved to Bowling Green, and early in February, 1862, to Nashville, thence to Murfreesboro, thence to Corinth, where it arrived March 20. In April it marched north and fought gallantly at bloody Shiloh, losing 350 killed, wounded, captured and missing out of 470 en- gaged. It reorganized at Corinth and with it was consolidated the rem- nant of the Fifty-fifth Regiment. Late in July it moved to Chattanooga, thence north to invade Kentucky, and October 8 fought desperately at Perryville, losing 42 killed and wounded. It suffered in that awful re- treat south. September 19 and 20, 1863, at Chattanooga the regiment fought heroically and charged the enemy with terrible effect, losing severely, 1t was soon detached and sent with Longstreet to besiege Knoxville. It fought at Bean’s Station and elsewhere and went into winter quarters at Morristown. In May, 1864, it moved to Richmond Va., and was engaged at Drury’s Bluff, Petersburg, Walthall’s Junction and elsewhere besides numerous skirmishes, and was finally surrendered and’ paroled. The Forty-fifth Tennessee (Confederate ) Regiment was raised in the counties of Wilson (Companies B, F, G and EID), Williamson (A), and Rutherford (D, C, H and I), and was organized at Camp Trousdale, Sum- ner County in the autumn of 1861, with Addison Mitchell, colonel. Atter various movements, during which it did duty in Mississippi and Louisiana, it joined the army of Gen. A. 8. Johnston and participated in the brilliant es - - —————— ——— RA PT EE EGE APSE TELLIN GE ETE TE IO_ : wa eae Sy a i eee ae h j 4 hey ae Bh { i { Lin ie Ua} ; 7 4 4 ia +t 7 rei eek tes a Be 23) i | 4 it} ‘Fi sai aa} See PERF ee 3 i wees Pe a a ee ee a 588 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Confederate victory at Shiloh, losing heavily in killed and wound- ed. Company A suffered a loss of 7 killed and about twice as many wounded. It was reorganized at Corinth and was then placed on de- tached duty for some time, after which it participated in the Kentucky campaign, aad later was engaged in the headlong charges at Murfrees- boro, where it again lost severely. It moved southward; fought in the hottest of the awful battle of Chickamauga and again at Missionary Ridge, and in 1864, in many of the general engagements, on the movement to Atlanta, Rocky Face Ridge, Resaca (two) Powder Springs, Atlanta and Jonesboro and then at Columbia; second Murfreesboro, and in 1865, at Bentonville, N. C., where it surrendered. The Forty-sixth Tennessee (Confederate ) ras raised in West Tennessee, almost all the entire force going from Henry County, Legiment and was organized late in 1861, with J. M. Clarke, colonel. It partici- pated in the movement of Gen. Pillow up the Mississippi, was at Colum- bus and Island No. 10, and later at Port Hudson, where it lost several men, killed and wounded. For a time it was part of Stewart’s brigade. Many of the regiment were saptured and died in prison at Camp Doug- las and elsewhere. It participated in the Kentucky campaign under Gen. Bragg, losing a few men killed and wounded at Perryville. OOD? oO It par- ticipated with the Army of Tennessee in all the principal movements of that command, engaging the enemy in numerous places and losing in the Ce ag oO regate heavily. It was finally consolidated with other regiments. The Forty-seventh Tennessee (Confederate) Regiment was organized late in 1861, with M. R. Hill, colonel, and was raised in the counties of Obion, Gibson and Dyer, and first participated in the movements of Gen. Polk’s army succeeding the battle of Belmont. It moved southward and joined the army, and finally, in April, 1862, engaged the enemy at Shiloh. Later it participated in the actions around Corinth, and finally marched with Bragg into Kentucky, fighting at Richmond and skirmishing else- where. It returned to Tennessee, and just before the battle of Murfrees- boro was consolidated with the Twelfth Regiment. The Forty-eighth Tennessee (Confederate, Voorhees) Regiment was raised in Maury, Hickman and Lewis Counties, and was organized in December, 1861, with W. M. Voorhees, colonel. It moved to Clarks- ville, thence to Danville, thence to Fort Henry, and after the evacuation there, to Fort Donelson, where, after fighting in that historical action, it surrendered. After about six months it was exchanged at Vicksburg, was reorganized at Jackson with Voorhees again colonel. A portion of the regiment, on details, in hospitals and on furlough, had escaped the capture at Fort Donelson, and with five companies from Wayne and— y Vj Wy, Y 2 2 —_ © 3 ~ S S S = = SS s SS > \ NY NH G4 S (ace >| Mie" \ Win, = ( * 1) ir VY AQ tiie PANY Y Mad ~ Ks Wd SA, tii Vy, Wy NY UY (Ww""Y n nn as \ C S \ YY % SD We" : Hp QO, Vid, % lly = ~ aw Z Fe SL wMiiy hae A) / i Zi ( SS “4 A SS ZyKE NSE & S&S ZS U" Zo ami Goi Bry .& NW Sy \ hil \\y GG, Fi ee ULL ff | | L ip = Fon federateg| JME Ee Wy WIZ ® 4 yy > “ueeADet Rosition, of" YjA\Z © Vy “zs = ows . wy) Z —_, ~ & ~ ) Z ——— S ‘ — Z = ——>-»ws —— ’ < me vs a A> SS \ \ \ Ye A) A Yar Wy» A Wy, N Gig : lc EAA yy SS bey WZ g cers t (~ Eo SS tes Sa oe ‘Za —— ESS AWS Yr Ti N= SX WS &, : whi IN n 1) ee vy SS : 4 1)/ SS ee Wy, “yi Rill p> “ + EG! CUM, SS $ \iit! LAN Wy NAO AAA \\ GN ps Cl 4G se A = 0 \ Af N Af ON S YK Yt \f, \f7 7 #G wai ¢ DWN SY a Ny “ d TA \ = i{( i \ . \ \ = | iI f VS WS ON = "fi A, AY Van ‘ S a dp \ S “% \ y NN 4, ~ p 3 \ J Yi, Z WU aS 3 "Wi BW) ! ) i \\\l 1] Wy Y\\ “if |\\\ LM A\ Yh o7" i Ih iI Wy <7) Y / Ws Ma, FAW ZZ x Ss = Positio of a | . sok: a oie ~ Cavalr E r Cheathan, S Corps —— Confederate ee — —2 Cavalry ie TT Lee’s Gorps |ed os TO — aaa ge nee go PS ed ea TF % pa Pts ieee Meee in te ~~ eS es a ca i Stee. Gg iain alg CS Css So 7A L a x4 the Twenty-eighth Regiment. (See sket« h of the twenty eighth. ) | . a mT aes x i > . nen . . ° The One Hundred and Fifty-fourth Tennessee (Confederate ) Regi- anized at Memphis in 1860, all of Sumter with Preston Smith, colonel. Seven companies were I mphis, one in Henry County, one in McNairy County, and one in Hardeman County. It first marched. to» and after various movements marched north and Randolph in May, 1861, participated in the battle of Belmont, and afterward moved’ south into: Kentucky, and after the surrender of Fort Donelson to northern Missis- n April fought at bloody Shiloh with severe loss. It was: hen marched north with Bragg on ment was org before the war broke out, and was reorganized soon after the f -aised in Me sippi, and 1 then at Corinth until the evacuation, t ign, fighting ab Richmond, Ky., with great loss, and It marched south with the army, reaching: hotly engaged, losing over a. the Kentucky campa at Perryville, October 8. Murfreesboro where, December 31, it was third of those engaged. It retreated to. Chattanooga, thence to Chick- amauga, where it fought in that great battle in September, and later at Ii wintered at Dalton, and in 1864, in the Georgia: all the principal battles down to Atlanta, losing in It marched north with Hood and Missionary Ridge. campaign, fought in the aggregate many valuable men. invaded Tennessee, fighting at Franklin, Nashville and elsewhere, and re- treating south out of the State. It marched to the Carolinas, partici- pated in the action at Bentonville, and surrendered in April, 1865. In addition to the above organizations there were about twenty cav- alry regiments whose movements it has been almost impossible to trace. About eighteen battalions of cavalry were in the Confederate service from Tennessee. Many of the battalions, which had first served as such and perhaps independently, were consolidated to form regiments. Aside from this there were numerous independent cavalry companies or squads: organized in almost every county of the State to assist the Confederate: eause. The leading cavalry organizations of the State served mainly: with the commands of Gens. Wheeler, Wharton and Forrest. The artillery organizations of the State were so often changed, and! have left such obscure records, that no attempt will be made here to. trace: their movements. They were in nearly all the artillery duels of the Mis- sissippi department. The following is an imperfect list of the Tennes- see batteries: Colms’ Battery, Capt. 8. H. Colms; Appeal Battery, Capt. W. N. Hogg; Bankhead’s Battery, Capt. S. P. Bankhead; Barry's Bat- tery, Capt. R. L. Barry; Belmont Battery, Capt. J. G. Anglade; Brown's: Battery, Capt. W. R. Marshall; Burrough’s Battery, Capt. W... H.. Bur—HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 595 roughs; Carnes’ Battery, Capt. W. W. Carnes; Scott’s Battery, Capt. W. L. Scott; Miller’s Battery, Capt. William Miller; Rice’s Battery, Capt. T. W. Rice; Kain’s Battery, Capt. W. ©. Kain; Anglade’s Battery, Capt. J. G. Anglade; Mebane’s Battery, Capt. J. W. Mebane; Wright’s Battery, Capt. H. E. Wright; Morton’s Battery, Capt. J. W. Morton, Jadkeon's Battery, Capt. W. H. Jackson; Freeman’s Battery, Capt. S. L. Freeman ; Hoxton’s Battery, Capt. Lewis Hoxton; McAdoo’s Battery, Capt. J. M. McAdoo; Huwald’s Battery, Capt. G. A. Huwald; Krone’s Battery, Capt. F. Krone; Taylor's Battery, Capt. J. W. Taylor; Dismukes’ Battery, Capt. P. T. Dismukes; Griffith’s Battery, Capt. R. P. Griffith; Maney’s Battery, Capt. F. Maney; Calvert's Battery, Capt. J. H. Calvert; El- dridge’s Battery, Capt. J. W. Eldridge; McClung’s Battery, Capt. pees McClung; Tobin’s Battery, Capt. Thomas Tobin; Stankienry’s Battery, Capt. P. K. Stankienry; Bibb’s Battery, Capt. R. W. Bibb; Wilson’s Battery, Capt. W. O. Williams; Fisher’s Battery, Capt. J. A. Fisher; McDonald’s Battery, Capt. C. McDonald; Ramsey’s Battery, Capt. 1D), 18% Ramsey; Keys’ Battery, Capt. T. J. Keys; Porter’s Battery, Capt. T. K. Porter; Baxter’s Battery, Capt. E. Baxter; Humes’ Battery, Capt. W. Y Humes; Jackson’s Battery, W. H. J ackson; Lynch’s Battery, Capt. J. P. Lynch, and others. ORGANIZATION OF THE ARMY CORPS AT BOWLING GREEN, KY., OCTOBER 28 1861, GEN. A. S. JOHNSTON, COMMANDIN re First Division, Maj.-Gen. W. J. Hardee. Infantry: First Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Hindman—Second Arkansas Regiment, Lieut.-Col. Bocage: Second Arkansas Regiment, Col. A. T. Hawthorn; Arkansas Battalion, Lieut.-Col. Marmaduke. Second Brigade, Col. P. KR. Cleburne——First Arkansas Regiment, Col. Cleburne; Fifth Arkansas Regiment, Col. D. C. Cross; Seventh Mississippi Regiment, Col. J. J. Thornton; Tennes- see Mountain Rifles, Col. B. J. Hill. Third Brigade, Col. R. G. Shaver— Seventh Arkansas Regiment, Col. Shaver; Highth Arkansas Regiment, Col. W. RB. Patterson; Twenty-fourth Tennessee Regiment, Col. R. D. Allison; Ninth Arkansas Regiment, Tete Coly Gude Masons. Caveltyae Adams’ Regiment and Phifer’s Battalion. Artillery __Swett’s, Trigg’s, Hubbard’s and Byrne’s Batteries. Second Division, Brig.-Gen. S. B. Buckner. Infantry: First Bri- gade, Col. Hanson—Hanson’s, Thompson’s, Trabue’s, Hunt's, Lewis and Cofer’s Kentucky regiments. Second Brigade, Col. Baldwin—Tlour- teenth Mississippi, Col. Baldwin; Twenty-sixth Tennessee Regiment, Col. Lillard. Third Brigade, Col. J. CG. Brown—Third Tennessee Reg- *Taken from the official report.Min en Fits aes axe Soe de v w i t whe ae / in oe soos Nene RO ASE Oe ee Re webiste aan oantopareate ee Se ine MER cele ieameneinai sreaieiaaidiciamaintes I codendimeemas amen cone ‘ahd een. Distal = = epee A a sted commie aa ea - “- us a th a ears aah a Sal hl 1 - ~ canametpe pated tines etal ee ~ e net ees =a 7 3 ae = ha _enneen it tenance ens 5 : a Ras AT ao J ~ - 3 : Se a : . a pene ~ - s BEET OT 2a ig. easel = iemeien - = " 2 = s Bey aba : he ae = * 2 = j x J asa’ Ser oe = . x POOR > — amo iminaingeions cena a pas Sune - ah Ser H a eellpeeh ncaa - = gt a an ct er x ipa g Z ie ante mt 3 = aroma sey Meee vn - a a | — = é as a me wt Ss f — - eee < nes ae ; ~ - ——— ~ = : ee e = Sr ae a ae es - EE Sa ETE Sa Se eR ie are et Tp OTe rae cso ~ = se ntunanapenamaers aa ae eae oe asa —_——— : , a aes I ae a - 3 are me — oe " "3 P mS . " x ae : _ - a a - re - —~ ee Se oe te sa Perewtwe se ms - ~ : = ‘i 2 mee ae ype = aa e ¥ a + aos = ae Seen Sniainne nano —- Saaalipenaliinesaneenaesnnsaail 7 — ——— —— eee = as i = ; a ——— ee: senor =~ ae : ~ = ae Jae peak — Smancan ema = ae i ts rf t = , = = eke na = Seat ae wrens — afer Nir linet 096 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. iment, Col. Brown; Twenty-third Tennessee Regiment, Col. Martin; Eighteenth Tennessee Regiment, Col. Palmer. Reserve—Texas Regiment, Col. B. F. Terry; Tennessee Regiment, Col. Stanton; Harper’s and Spencer’s Batteries. CONFEDERATE FORCES AND LOSS AT SHILOH. * First Corps, Maj.-Gen. Leonidas Polk. First Division, Brig.-Gen. Charles Clark; First Brigade, Col. R. M. Russell; Second Brigade, Brig.-Gen. A. P. Stewart. Second Division, Brig.-Gen. B. F. Cheat- ham; First Brigade, Brig.-Gen. B. R. Johnson; Second Brigade, Col. W. H. Stephens. Second Corps, Maj.-Gen. Braxton Bragg. First Di- vision, Brig.-Gen. Daniel Ruggles; First Brigade, Col. R. L. Gibson; Second Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Patton Anderson; Third Brigade, Col. Pres- ton Pond. Second Division, Brig.-Gen. J. M. Withers; First Brigade, Brig.-Gen. A. H. Gladden; Second Brigade, Brig.-Gen. J. BR. Chalmers, Third Brigade, Brig.-Gen. J. K. Jackson. Third Corps, Maj.-Gen. W. J. Hardee. First Brigade, Brig.-Gen. T. C. Hindman; Second Brigade, Brig.-Gen. P. R. Cleburne; Third Brigade, Brig.-Gen. S. A. M. Wood. Reserve Corps, Maj.-Gen. J. C. Breckinridge; First (Kentucky) Brigade, Col. R. P. Trabue; Second Brigade, Brig.-Gen. J. 8. Bowen; Third Brigade, Col. W. S. Statham. Total loss, 1,728 killed, 8,012 wounded and 959 missing. CONFEDERATE STATES FORCES, GEN. BRAXTON BRAGG, COMMANDING, ARMY OF THE MISSISSIPPI. JUNE 30, 1862.* First Army Corps, Maj.-Gen. Leonidas Polk, commanding. First Division, Brig.-Gen. Clark. First Brigade, Col. Russell—Tweltth Tennessee, Thirteenth Tennessee, Forty-seventh Tennessee, One Hundred and Fifty-fourth Tennessee, Bankhead’s Battery. Second Brigade, Brig.- Gen. A. P. Stewart—Thirteenth Arkansas, Fourth Tennessee, Fifth Ten- nessee, Thirty-first Tennessee, Thirty-third Tennessee, Stanford’s Bat- tery. Second Division, Brig.-Gen.;B. F. Cheatham.) First Brigade, Brig.-Gen. D. S. Donelson—Eighth Tennessee, Fifteenth Tennessee, Six- teenth Tennessee, Fifty-first Tennessee, Carnes’ Battery. Second Brigade, Brig.-Gen. George Maney—First Tennessee, Sixth Tennessee, Ninth Tennessee, Twenty-seventh Tennessee, Smith’s Battery. Detached Bri- gade, Brig.-Gen. S. B. Maxey—Forty-first Georgia, Twenty-fourth Muis- sissippi, Ninth Texas, Eldredge’s Battery. Second Army Corps, Maj.- Gen. Samuel Jones. First Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Patton Anderson— *From the official reports.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 97 Twenty-fifth Louisiana, Thirtieth Mississippi, Thirty-seventh Missis- sippi, Forty-first Mississippi, Florida and Confederate Battalion, Slo- eumb’s Battery. Second Brigade, Col. A. Reichard—Forty-fifth Ala- bama, Eleventh Louisiana, Sixteenth Louisiana, Highteenth Louisiana, Nineteenth Louisiana, Twentieth Louisiana, Barnett’s Battery. Third Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Walker—First Arkansas, Twenty-first Louisiana, Thirteenth Louisiana, Crescent (Louisiana), Independent Tennessee, Thirty-eighth Tennessee, Lumsden’s Battery, Barrett's Battery. Third Army Corps, Maj.-Gen. W. J. Hardee. First Brigade, Col. St. J. R. Liddell—Second Arkansas, Fifth Arkansas, Sixth Arkansas, Seventh Ar- kansas, Highth Arkansas, Pioneer Company, Robert’s Battery. Second Brigade, Brig. Gen. P. R. Cleburne—Fifteenth Arkansas, Second Ten- nessee, Fifth (Thirty-fifth) Tennessee, Twenty-fourth Tennessee, Forty- eighth Tennessee, Calvert’s Battery. Third Brigade, Brig.-Gen. S. A. M. Wood—Sixteenth Alabama, Thirty-second Mississippi, Thirty-third Mis- sissippi, Forty-fourth Tennessee, Baxter’s Battery. Fourth Brigade, Brig. - Gen. J. S. Marmaduke—Third Confederate, Twenty-fifth Tennessee, Twenty-ninth Tennessee, Thirty-seventh Tennessee, Swett’s battery. Fifth Brigade, Col. A. 'T. Hawthorn—Thirty-third Alabama, Seventeenth Tennessee, Twenty-first Tennessee, Twenty-third T'ennessee, Austin’s Battery. Reserve Corps, Brig.-Gen. J. M. Withers. First Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Frank Gardner—Nineteenth Alabama, T'wenty-second Ala- bama, Twenty-fifth Alabama, Twenty-sixth Alabama, Thirty-ninth Ala- bama, Sharpshooters, Robertson’s Battery. Second Brigade, Brig.-Gen. J. R. Chalmers—Fifth Mississippi, Seventh Mississippi, Ninth Missis- sippi, Tenth Mississippi, Twenty-ninth Mississippi, Blythe’s Mississippi, Ketchum’s Battery. Third Brigade, Brig.-Gen. J. K. Jackson—Seven- teenth Alabama, Highteenth Alabama, Twenty-first Alabama, T'wenty- fourth Alabama, Fifth Georgia, Burtwell’s Battery. Fourth Brigade, Col. A. M. Manigault—Twenty-eighth Alabama, Thirty-fourth Alabama, First Louisiana (detached), Tenth South Carolina, Nineteenth South Carolina, Water’s Battery. ARMY OF THE WEST, MAJ.-GEN. J. P. M’CcOWN, COMMANDING. First Division, Brig.-Gen. Henry Little. First Brigade, Col. Elijah Gates—Sixteenth Arkansas, First Missouri (dismounted), Second Mis- souri, Third Missouri, Missouri Battalion, Wade’s Battery. Second Bri- gade, Brig.-Gen. P. O. Hébert—Fourteenth Arkansas, Seventeenth Ar- kansas, Third Louisiana, Whitfield’s Texas Cavalry (dismounted), Greer’s Texas Cavalry (dismounted), McDonald’s Battery. Third Bri- gade, Brig.-Gen. M. E. Green—Fourth Missouri, Missouri Battalion, Mis- agp SN I A OO AE TELA LE A TOSe ie eRe mt i idee sa - nee apis nga. a wane atte acne gine “i : a a ome - a ae a HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. souri Cavalry Battalion (dismounted ), Confederate Rangers (dis- mounted), King’s Battery. Second Division, Maj.-Gen. J. P. McCown. First Brigade, Brig. _Gen. W. L. Cobell—McCr ray’s Arkansas, Four- teenth Texas Cavalr y (dismounted ), Tenth Texas Cavalry (dismounted), Eleventh Texas Cavalry (dismounted), Andrews’ Texas, Good’s Battery. Second Brigade, Brig.-Gen. T. J. Ghurchill—Fourth Arkansas, First Arkansas Riflemen ( dismounted), Second Arkansas Riflemen (dis- mounted ), Fourth Arkansas Battalion, Turnbull’s Arkansas Battalion, Reve’s Missouri Scouts, Humphrey’s Battery. Third Division, Brig.- Gen. D. H. Maury. First Brigade, Col. TP. Dockery, Highteenth Ar- kansas, Nineteenth Arkansas, ieonticnn Arkansas, McCairns’ Arkansas Battalion, Jones’ Arkansas Battalion, ——— Battery. Second Brigade, Brig.-Gen. J. CG. Moore—Hobb’s Arkansas, Adams’ Arkansas, Thirty fifth Mississippi, Second Texas, Bledsoe’s Battery. Third Brigade, Brig.- Gen. GC. W. Phifer—Third Arkansas Cavalry (dismounted), Sixth Texas: Cavalry (dismounted), Ninth Texas Cavalry (dismounted), Brook’s Bat- talon, MeNally’s Battery. Reserved Batteries: Hoxton’s Landis’, Gui- bor’s and Brown’s. Cavalry: Forrest’s Regiment, Webb's Squadron, Sayery’s Company, McCulloch’s Regiment and Price’s Body Guard. THE ARMY OF TENNESSEE AT MURFREESBORO, GEN. BRAXTON BRAGG. COMMANDING.* Polk’s | (First) Corps, Lieut. -Gen. Leonidas Polk, souimandmens First Division, Maj.-Gen. B. F. Cheatham. First Brigade, Brig.- Gen. D. 8. Donelson: Eighth Tennessee, Col. W. L. Moore and Lieut.- Col. John H. Anderson; Sixteenth Tennessee, Col. John H. Savage; Thirty-eighth Tennessee, Col. John C. Carter; Fifty-first ‘Tennessee, Col. John Chester: Eighty-fourth Tennessee, Col. 5. S. Stanton; Carnes Battery (Steuben Artillery), Lieut. J. G. Marshall. Second Brigade, Brig. Clem A. P. Stewart: Fourth and Fifth Tennessee Volunteers (con- solidated). Col. O. F. Strahl; Nineteenth Tennessee, Col. F. M. Walker; Twenty fourth Tennessee, Maj. S. E. Shannon and Col. H. L. W.. Brat- ton; Thirty-first and Thirty-third Tennessee (consolidated), Col. E. E. Transil; Stanford’s Mississippi Battery, Capt. T. J. Stanford. Third Brigade, Brig.-Gen. George Maney: First and Twenty-seventh Tennes- see (consolidated), Col. H. R. Held: Fourth Tennessee (Confederate ), Col. J. A. McMurray; Sixth and Ninth Tennessee (consolidated), Col. C. S. Hurt and Maj. John L. Harris; Tennessee Sharpshooters, Maj. F. Maney; M. Smith’s Battery, Lieut. W. B. Turner, commanding... *Organization at the Battle of Murfreesboro or Stone River, Tenn., December 3l, 1862, to January 3, 1863 +Copied by permission from Military Annals of Tennessee.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 999! Fourth (Smith’s) Brigade, Col. A. J. Vaughan, Jr.: Twelfth Tennessee, Maj. J. N. Wyatt; Thirteenth Tennessee, Capt. R. F. Lanier and Lieut.- Col. W. E. Morgan; Twenty-ninth Tennessee, Maj. J. B. Johnson; Forty-seventh Tennessee, Capt. W. M. Watkins; One Hundred and Fifty- fourth Tennessee (senior), Lieut.-Col. M. Magevney, Jr.; Ninth Marae! Col. W. H. Young; Sharpshooters (P. T. Allen’s), Lieut. JE aar Creighton and Lieut. T. T. Pattison; Scott’s Battery, Capt. W. Lb. Scott. Second Division, Maj.-Gen. J. M. Withers. First (Deas’) Brigade, Cols. J. Q. Loomis and J. G. Coltart: Hirst Louisiana, Lieut.-Col. F. H. Farrar, Jr.; Nineteenth Alabama, Twenty-second Alabama, Twenty-filth Alabama, Twenty-sixth Alabama, Thirty-ninth Alabama; Robertson’s Battery (temporarily assigned on January 2, to Gen. Breckinridge ), Capt. F. H. Robertson. Second Brigade, Brig.-Gen. James R. Chalmers and Col. T. W. White: Seventh Mississipp1; Ninth Mississippi, Col. T. W. White; Tenth Mississipp1; Forty-first Mississippi; Blythe’s Forty- fourth Mississipp1 Regiment (battalion of sharpshooters ), Capt. O. EF. West; Garrity’s (late Ketchum’s) Battery (Company A, Alabama State Artillery), Capt. James Garrity. Third (Walthall’s) Brigade, Brig.- Gen. J. Patton Anderson: Forty-fifth Alabama, Col. James Gilchrist; Twenty-fourth Mississippl, Lieut.-Col. R. P. McKelvaine; Twenty-seventh Mississippi, Col. T. M. Jones, Col. J. L. Autry, and Capt. E. R. Neilson; Twenty-ninth Mississippi, Col. W. F. Brantly and Tieut--Col) Jp By Mor= gan; Thirtieth Mississippi, Lieut.-Col. J. J. Scales; Thirty-ninth North Carolina (temporarily attached on the field), Capt. A. W. Bell; Missouri Battery, Capt. O. W. Barrett. Fourth Brigade, Brig.-Gen. J. Patton Anderson (Col. A. M. Manigault, commanding ) : Twenty-fourth Alabama, Twenty-eighth Alabama, Thirty-fourth Alabama, Tenth and Nineteenth South Carolina (consolidated ), Col. A. J. Lythgoe; Alabama Battery, Capt. D. D. Waters. | Note: McCown’s Division, Smith’s Corps, was temporarily attached to Polk’s Corps, but was with Cleburne’s Division, Hardee’s Corps, under the immediate command of Gen. Hardee. | Hardee’s (Second) Corps, Lieut.-Gen. W. J. Hardee, commanding. First Division, Maj.-Gen. J. C. Breckinridge. First Brigade, Brig.- Gen. D. W. Adams, Col, R. L. Gibson: Thirty-second Alabama, Col. Alex McKinstry and Lieut.-Col. H. Maury; Thirteenth and Twentieth Louisiana (consolidated), Col. R. L. Gibson and Maj. Charles Guillet; Sixteenth and Twenty-fitth Louisiana (consolidated ), Col. 8. W. Fisk and Maj. F. C. Zacharie; Battalion of Sharpshooters, Maj. J. E. Austin; Fifth Company Washington Artillery of Louisiana, Lieut. W. C. D. Vaught. Second Brigade, Col. J. B. Palmer (Brig.-Gen G. J. Pillow, commanding .partao . oe biedgS: witha AG Deb ogee EAL i - EN ae en en . as : * = CQLEM? -— = (4 2 ) MT py. iy Siyios’ COD i. aul Wy, vw yay yy, BG < G Ssa gece a eres pao eeHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 605 erate, Capt. C. H. Conner; Fifth Georgia, Maj. R. J. Davant, Jr. Dib- rell’s Brigade, Col. G. G. Dibrell: Fourth Tennessee, Col. W. S. McLe- more; Highth Tennessee, Capt. J. Leftwich; Ninth Tennessee, Capt. J. M. Reynolds; Tenth Tennessee, Maj. John Minor. Hannon’s Brigade, Col. M. W. Hannon: Fifty-third Alabama, Lieut.-Col. J. F. Gaines: Twenty-fourth Alabama Battalion, Maj. R. B. Snodgrass. Hume’s Division. 23 Se Sac oe ee eee emcees bie ee Tes CT Tag ee RATT —_ pe mo aR ai ——_ 7 i a en! = So ae A -aa Sages ee CO en titan nee Ey The Si TE Se Ee ee a ee eT, ee so = a —a 608 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. . . / 5 < ? y a X ” / sippi, Col. J. G. Wilkinson. Maney's Brigade, Brig.-Gen. George Ma- d Twenty-Seventh Tennessee, Col. H. R. Field; Fourth army), Col. J. A. McMurray, Lieut.-Col. R. N. apt. J. Bostick; Sixth and Ninth Ten- : r i nae : 1 : : ° nessee, Col. George C. Porter; Tw ent} pou Tennessee Battalion (sharpshooters ), Maj. Frank Maney. Smith’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Pres- T ce eG : : Y AT ton Smith, Col. A. J. Vaughan, Jr.: Eleventh Tennessee, @ole Ge “We Gordon; Twelfth and Forty-seventh Tennessee, Col. W. M. Watkins; Thirteenth and One Hundred and Fifty-fourth Tennessee, Coll Aq: Tm and) lieut-Col. ak. W.. Pitman; Twenty-ninth Tennessee, | Dawson’s Battalion Sharpshooters (composed of two companies from the Eleventh Tennessee, two from the Twelfth and Forty- seventh Tennessee (consolidated), and one from the One Hundred and Fifty-fourth Senior Tennessee) Maj. J. W. Dawson and Maj. William Groen! Wright's Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Marcus J. Wright: Highth Ten- nessee, Col. John H. Anderson; Sixteenth Tennessee, Col. D. M. Don- sssee, Col. §. S. Stanton; Thirty-eighth Ten- nell; Twenty-eighth Tenne nessee and Murray’s (Tennessee) Battalion, Col. J. C. Carter; Fitty- first and Fifty-second Tennessee, Lieut.-Col. John G. Hall. Strahl’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. O. F. Strahl: Fourth and Fifth Tennessee, Col. J. J. Lamb; Nineteenth Tennessee, Col. F. M. Walker; Twenty-fourth Ten- nessee, Col. J. A. Wilson; Thirty-first Tennessee, Gol Hy Hy Lancilk: Thirty-third Tennessee. Artillery, Maj. Melancthon Smith: Carnes’ (Tennessee ) Battery, Capt. W. W. Carnes; Scogin’s (Georgia) Battery, Capt. John Scogin; Scott's (Tennessee) Battery, Lieuts. J. H. Marsh and ney: First an Tennessee (provisional Lewis, Maj. O. A. Bradshaw and © Vaughan, Col. Horace Rice; A. T. Watson; Smith’s (Mississippi) Battery, Lieut. William B. Turner; Stanford’s Battery, Capt. T. J. Stanford. Center, Hill’s Corps, Lieut.-Gen. Daniel H. Hill, commanding. Cleburne’s Division, Maj.-Gen. P. R. Cleburne. Wood’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. S. A. M. Wood: Sixteenth Alabama, Maj. J. H. McGaughy and Capt. F. A. Ashford; Thirty-third Alabama, Col. Samuel Adams; Forty-fifth Alabama, Col. E. B. Breedlove; Highteenth Alabama Battal- ion, Maj. J. H. Gibson and Gol. Samuel Adams; Thirty-third Alabama, Thirty-second and Forty-fifth Mississippi, Col. M. P. Lowery; Sharp- shooters, Maj. A. T. Hawkins and Capt. Daniel Coleman. Polk’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. L. E. Polk. First Arkansas, Col. J. W. Colquitt: Third and Fifth Confederate, Col. J. A. Smith; Second Tennessee, Col. W. D. Robison; Thirty-fifth Tennessee, Col. B. J. Hill; Forty- eighth Tennessee, Col. G. H. Nixon. Deshler’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. James Deshler, Col. R. Q. Mills: Nineteenth and Twenty-fourth Arkan- sas, Lieut.-Col. A. 8. Hutchinson; Sixth, Tenth and Fifteenth Texas, Col.HISTORY OF TENNESSER. 609 R. Q. Mills and Lieut.-Col. T. Scott Anderson; Seventeenth, Kighteenth, Twenty-fourth and Twenty-fifth Texas (dismounted cavalry), Col. F. C. Wilkes, Ihieut.-Col. John T. Coit and Maj, W. A. Taylor. Artillery: Maj. T. R. Hotchkiss, Capt. H. C. Semple; Calvert’s Battery, Tent Thomas J. Key; Douglas’s Battery, Capt. J. P. Douglas; Semple’s Bat- tery, Capt. H. C. Semple and Lieut. R. W. Goldthwaite. Breckinridge’s Division, Maj.-Gen. John C. Brickinridge. Helm’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Benjamin H. Helm, Col. J. H. Lewis: Forty-first Alabama, Col. M. L. Stansel; Second Kentucky, Col. J. W. Hewitt and Lieut.-Col. J. W. Moss; Fourth Kentucky, Col. Joseph P. Nuckols, Jr., and Maj. T. W. Thompson; Sixth Kentucky, Col. J. H. Lewis and Lieut. - Col. M. H. Cofer; Ninth Kentucky, Col. J. W. Caldwell and Lieut.-Col. J. C. Wickliffe. Adam’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Daniel W. Adams, Col. R. L. Gibson: Thirty-second Alabama, Maj. J. C. Kimball; Thirteenth and Twentieth Louisiana, Cols. R. L. Gibson and Leon Von Zinken and Capt. E. M. Dubroca; Sixteenth and Twenty-fifth Louisiana, Col. D. Gober; Nineteenth Louisiana, Lieut.-Col. R. W. Turner, Maj. L. Butler and Capt. H. A. Kennedy; Fourteenth Louisiana Battalion, Maj. J. H. Austin. Stovall’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. M. A. Stovall: First and Third Florida, Col. W. 8. Dilworth; Fourth Florida, Col. W. L. L. Bowen; Forty-seventh Georgia, Capts. Wiliam S. Phillips and Joseph S. Cone; Sixtieth North Carolina, Lieut.-Col. J. M. Ray and Capt. J. T. Weaver. Artillery, Maj. R. HE. Graves: Cobb’s Battery, Capt. Robert Cobb; Mebane’s Battery, Capt. John W. Mebane; Slocomb’s Battery, Capt. C. H. Slocomb. Reserve Corps, Maj.-Gen. W. H. T. Walker, commanding. Walker’s Division, Brig.-Gen. S. R. Gist. Gist’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. S.R. Gist, Col. P. H. Colquitt, Lieut.-Col. L. Napier: Forty-sixth Geor- gia, Col. P. H. Colquitt and Maj. A. M. Speer: Highth Georgia Battal- ion, Lieut.-Col. L. Napier; Sixteenth South Carolina (not engaged; at Rome), Col. J. McCullough; Twenty-fourth South Carolina, Col Carr Stevens and Lieut.-Col. E. Capers. Ector’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. MED: Ector: Stone’s Alabama Battalion, Pound’s Mississipp1 Battlalion, Twenty-ninth North Carolina, Ninth Texas, Tenth, Fourteenth and Thirty-second Texas Cavalry (serving as infantry). Wilson’s Brigade, Col. C. C. Wilson: Twenty-fifth Georgia, Tieut.-Col. A. J. Williams; Twenty-ninth Georgia, Lieut. G. R. McRae; Thirtieth Georgia, Lieut.- Col. J. S. Boynton; First Georgia Battalion (sharpshooters ), Fourth Louisiana Battalion. Artillery, Ferguson’s Battery (not engaged; at Rome), Lieut. R. T. Beauregard; Martin’s Battery. Liddell’s Division, Brig.-Gen. St. John R. Liddell. Liddell’s Bri- a or “ oe - 4610 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. gade, Col. D. C. Govan: Second and Fifteenth Arkansas, Lieut.-Col. R. T. Harvey and Capt. A. T. Meek: Fifth and Thirteenth Arkansas, Col. L. Featherstone and Lieut.-Col. John HE. Murray; Sixth and Seventh Arkansas, Col. D. A. Gillespie and Lieut. -Col. P. Snyder; Highth Ar- kansas, Lieut.-Col. G. F. Baucum and Maj. A. Watkins; First Louisiana, th 4 Lieut.-Col. G. F. Baucum and Maj. A. Watkins. Walthall’s Brigade, | a Brig.-Gen. E. CG. Walthall: Twenty-fourth Mississippi, Lieut. -Col. R. ie P. Wailea. Maj. W. C. Staples and Capts. B. F. Toomer and J. i. ‘il D. Smith: Twenty-seventh Mississippi, Col. James A. Campbell; Twen- He ty-ninth Mississippi, Col. W. F. Brantly; Thirtieth Mississippi, Col. J. L Scales; Lieut.-Col. Hugh A. Reynolds and Maj. J. M. John- ae on Petia a | a | on: Thirty-fourth Mississippi (Thirty-fourth Mississippi had four com- Hy i Bee at Chickamauga), Maj. W. G. Pegram, Capt. H. J. Bowen, ‘ 1 | Lieut.-Col. H. A. Reynolds and ——, Artillery, Capt. Chas. Swett: na Fowler’s Battery, Capt. W. H. Fowler; Warren Light Artillery, Lieut. H. Shannon. Left Wing, Lieut.-Gen. James Longstreet, commanding. Hindman’s Division, Maj.-Gen. T. C. Hindman, Brig.-Gen. J. Patton Anderson. Anderson’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. J. Patton Anderson: Col. J. H. Sharp, Seventh Mississipp1; Col. W. H. Bishop; Ninth Mississippi, Maj. T. H. Lyman; Tenth Mississippi Lieut.-Col. James Barr; Forty-first Mississippi, Col. W. F. Tucker; Forty-fourth Mississippi, Col. J. H. Sharp: and Lieut.-Col. R. G. Kelsey; Ninth Mississippi, Battalion (sharpshoot- al ers), Maj. W. C. Richards; Garrity’s Battery, Capt. J. Garrity. Deas’ Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Z. C. Deas: Nineteenth Alabama, Cols; Ke Wic= anne alan Eats lorie Ee i i | Spadden; Twenty-second Alabama, Lieut. Col. John Weedon and Capt. ne ie | H. T. Toulmin; Twenty-fifth Alabama, Col. George D. Johnston; Thirty- ninth Alabama, Col. W. Clark; Fiftieth Alabama, Col. J. G. Coltart; Seventeenth Alabama Battalion (sharpshooters), Capt. James F. Na- Hit bers; Robertson’s Battery, Lieut. S. H. Dent. Manigault’s Brigade, Brig:- (i Gen. A. M. Manigault: Twenty-fourth Alabama, Col. N. N. Davis; Hi Twenty-eighth Alabama, Col. John C. Reid; Thirty-fourth Alabama, Maj. J. N. Slaughter; Tenth and Nineteenth South Carolina, Col. James FP. Pressley; Waters’ Battery, Lieut. Charles W. Watkins and George D. Turner. Buckner’s Corps, Ma}. Gen.-Simon B. Buckner, commanding. Stewart’s Division, Maj.-Gen. A. P. Stewart. Johnson’s Brigade (part of Johnson’s provisional division), Brig.-Gen. B. R. Johnson, Col. J.S. Fulton: Seventeenth Tennessee, Lieut.-Col. Watt W. Floyd; Twenty- third Tennessee, Col. R. H. Keeble; Twenty-fifth Tennessee Lieut.-Col. R. B. Snowden; Forty-fourth Tennessee, Lieut.-Col. J. lL. McEwen, Jr., a is ante = = ence ar Ta ae ~ . — Seen See a = " 7 =e = - aie ape ieee : nee Sei Shwe aN gS oer ere Sn grr ee naa 3 oe — = » ress Oana — a a rT na a ~~ —— Pe ~ ~ ee ee eee seins = = te Srna - Tee ~ rte ae Piste 7% = Pr re ‘ i lah iri cods eee abide ve ae ; ar — ce AONE pare aeemeieeneseee ae ieee ing geet a OR o persed Siro Eee eee ? ea te * . a ~ % stiles Do a ait Bis ria . my A Cel ee ce ae apa = raretin a Saeee * Ane ——— ie e : — : = Sa 7 —- i = Sao ae : a : - a re =~ Slap = ——— eaten a = mee = ee see aaget. Ee 8 2 Sip i ae SE era. a : oes = aes am nae ‘ ~ : . = bn 42 =, = z : a en th wink oieHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 611 and Maj. G. M. Crawford. Brown’s Brigade: Brig.-Gen. J. C. Brown, Col. Edmund C. Cook: Eighteenth Tennessee, Col. J. B. Palmer; Lieut.- Col. W. R. Butler and Capt. Gideon H. Lowe; Twenty-sixth onmescee Col. J. M. Lillard and Maj. R. M. Saffell; Thirty-second Tennessee, Col. E. C. Cook and Capt. C. G. Tucker; Forty-fitth Tennessee, Col. A. Searcy; Twenty-third Tennessee Battalion, Maj. T. W. Newman and Capt. W. P. Simpson. Bate’s Brigade, Brig. -Gen. W. B. Bate: Fifty-eighth Ala., Col. B. Jones; Thirty-seventh Georgia, Col. A. F. Rudler and Lieut.-Col. J.T Smith; Fourth Georgia Battalion (sharpshooters), Maj. T. D. Caswell, Capt. B. M. Turner and Lieut. Joel Towers; Fifteenth and Thirty-seventh Tennessee, Col. R. C. Tyler, Lieut.-Col. R. D. Trayser, and Capt. R. M. Tankesley ; Twentieth Tennessee, Col.\T. B. Smith and Maj. W. M. Shy. Clayton’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. H. D. Clayton: Eighteenth Alabama, Col de 1u Holeeelene Lieut.-Col. R. F. Inge and Maj. P. F. Hunley; Thirty-sixth Alabama, Col. L. T. Woodruff; Thirty-eighth Alabama, Lieut. Col. A. R. Lankford. Artillery, Maj. J. W. Hildridge: First Arkansas Battery, Capt. J. T. Humphreys; T. H. Dawson’s Battery, Lieut. R. W. Anderson; Eufaula Artillery, Capt. McD. Oliver; Ninth Georgia Artillery Battalion, Company E, Lieut. W. S. Everett. Preston’s Division, Brig.-Gen. William Preston. Gracie’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. A. Gracie, Jr.: Forty- third Alabama, Col. Y. M. Moody; First Alabama, Battalion (Hilliard’s Legion), Lieut. -Col. J. H. Holt and Capt.G, W. Huguley; Second Alabama Battalion, Lieut.-Col. B. Hall, Jr., and Capt. WD: Walden; Third Alabama Battalion (all of Hilliard’s Le- gion), Maj. J. W. A. Sanford; Fourth Alabama Battalion (Artillery bat- talion, Hilliard’s Legion), Maj. J. D. McLennan, Sixty-third Tennessee, Liecut.-Col. A. Fulkerson and Maj. John A. Aiken. Trige’s Brigade, Co]. R. C. Trigg: First Florida Cavalry (dismounted), Col. G. T. Max- well; Sixth Florida, Col. J. J. Finley; Seventh Florida, Col. R. Bullock; Fifty-fourth Virginia, Lieut. Col. John J. Wade. Third Brigade, Col. J. H. Kelly: Sixty-fifth Georgia, Col. R. H. Moore; Fifth Kentucky, Col. H. Hawkins; Fifty-eighth North Carolina, Col. J. B. Palmer; Sixty-third Virginia, Maj. J. M. French. Artillery Battalion: Maj. A. Leyden; Jet- fress’s Battery, Puble’s Battery, Wolihin’s Battery, York’s Battery. Re- serve Corps Artillery: Maj.S. C. Williams, Baxter’s Battery, Darden’s Battery, Kolb’s Battery, McCant’s Battery. Johnson’s Division,* Brig. -Gen. Bushrod R. Johnson. Gregg’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. John Gregg, Col. C. A. Sugg: Third Tennessee, Col. CoE OW oe Tenth Tennessee, Col. Wm. Grace; ee Tennessee ; *A provisional organization, embracing Johnson’s and part of the time Robertson's Breede as well as Gregg’s.and McNair’s, September 19, attached to Lungstreet’s Corps, under Maj.-Gen. Hood. ¢ eT nee peetoy Sp a ase 6GE ieee ae ssae ae aI ky Eicabos L = enero = anaes ania oe an mene nm en retenuinailie 612 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Forty-first Tennessee, Lieut.-Col. J. D. Tillman; Fittieth Tene ee Col. C. A. Sugg, Lieut.-Col. T. W. Beaumont, Maj. C. W. Robertson and Col. C. H. Walker; First Tennessee Battalion, Majs. 8. H. Colms and C. W. Robertson; Seventh Texas, Maj. K. M. Vanzandt; Bledsoe’s (Missouri) Battery, Lieut. R. L. Wood. McNair’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. B, McNair, Col. D. Coleman: First Arkansas Mounted Rifles, Col. Robert W. Harper; Second Arkansas Mounted Rifles, Col. James A. William- son: Twenty-fifth Arkansas, Lieut.-Col. Eli Huftstetter; Fourth and Thirty-first Arkansas Infantry and Fourth Arkansas Battalion (consoli- dated), Maj. J. A. Ross; Thirty-ninth North Carolina, Col. D. Coleman; Culpepper’s (South Carolina ) Battalion, Capt. J. F. Culpepper. Longstreet’s Corps,* Left Wing, Maj. John B. Hood, commanding. McLaw’s Division, Maj.-Gen. Lafayette McLaws, Brig.-Gen. J. B. Kershaw. Kershaw’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. J.B. Kershaw: Second South Carolina, Lieut.-Col. F. Gaillard; Third South Carolina, Col; Je =D: Nance; Seventh South Carolina, Lieut.-Col. Elbert Bland, Maj. J. S. Hard and Capt. E. J. Goggans; Eighth South Carolina, Col. J. W. Han- agan; Fifteenth South Carolina, Col. Joseph F. Gist; Third South Car- olina Battalion, Capt. J. M. Townsend. Wofford’s Brigade (Longstreet’s report indicates that these brigades did not arrive in time to take part in the battle), Brig.-Gen. W. T. Wofford: Sixteenth Georgia, Highteenth Georgia, Twenty-fourth Georgia, Third Georgia Battalion (sharpshoot- ers), Cobb’s (Georgia) Legion, Phillip’s (Georgia) Legion. Hum- phrey’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. B. G. Humphreys: Thirteenth Mississipp, Seventeenth Mississippi, Eighteenth Mississippi, Twenty-first Missis- sippi. Bryan’s Brigade (Longstreet’s report, etc., as above), Brig.-Gen. Goode Bryan: Tenth Georgia, Fiftieth Georgia, Fifty-first Georgia and Fifty-third Georgia, Hood’s Division, Maj.-Gen. John B. Hood, Brig.-Gen. E. M. Law. Jenkins’ Brigade (did not arrive in time to take part in the battle; Jen- kin’s Brigade assigned to the division September 11, 1863), Brig.-Gen. M. Jenkins: First South Carolina, Second South Carolina Rifles, Fifth South Carolina, Sixth South Carolina, Hampton Legion, Palmetto Sharp- shooters. Law’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. E. M. Law, Col. J. L. Sheffield: Fourth Alabama, Fifteenth Alabama, Col. W. C. Oates; Forty-fourth Alabama, Forty-seventh Alabama, Forty-eighth Alabama. Robertson’s Brigade (served part of the time in Johnson’s provisional division), Brig.-Gen. J. B. Robertson, Col. Van H. Manning: Third Arkansas, Col. Van H. Manning; First Texas, Capt. R. J. Harding; Fourth Texas, Col. * Army of Northern Virginia, organization taken from return of thatarmy for August 31, 1863; Pickett’s Division was left in Virginia.bd HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 613 John P. Bane and Capt. R. H. Bassett; Fifth Texas, Maj. J. C. Rogers and Capt. J. S. Cleveland and T. T. Clay. Anderson’s Brigade (did not arrive in time to take part in the battle), Brig.-Gen. George T. Ander- son: Seventh Georgia, Highth Georgia, Ninth Georgia, Eleventh Georgia, Fifty-ninth Georgia. Benning’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. H. L. Benning: Second Georgia, Lieut.-Col. Wm. S. Shepherd and Maj. W. W. Charlton; Fifteenth Georgia, Col. D. M. Du Bose and May. Ra J. ‘Shannon; Seventeenth Georgia, Lieut.-Col. Charles W. Matthews; Twentieth Georgia, Col. J. D. Waddell. Artillery Corps (did not arrive in time to take part in the battle), Col. E. Porter Alexander: Fickling’s (South Carolina) Battery, Jordan’s ( Virginia) Battery, Moody’s (Louis- iana) Battery, Parker’s ( Virginia) Battery, Taylor’s (Virginia) Battery, Woolfolk’s (Virginia) Battery. Artillery Reserve (Army of Tennessee), Maj. Felix Robertson: Barrett’s (Missouri) Battery, Le Gardeur’s (Lou- isiana) Battery (not mentioned in the reports, but in Reserve Artillery August 31, and Capt. Le Gardeur, ete., relieved from duty in the Army ‘of the Tennesse, November 1, 1863), Havis’ (Alabama) Battery, Lums- den’s (Alabama) Battery, Massenburg’s (Georgia) Battery. Cavalry Corps, Maj.-Gen. Joseph Wheeler, commanding. Wharton’s Division, Brig.-Gen. John A. Wharton. First Brigade, Col: C. CG. Crews; Seventh Alabama, Second Georgia, Third Georgia, Fourth Georgia, Col. I. W. Avery. Second Brigade, Col. T. Harrison; Third Confederate, Col. W. N. Estes; First Kentucky, Lieut.-Col. J. W. Griffith; Fourth Tennessee, Col. Paul F. Anderson; Eighth Texas, Eley- enth Texas, White’s (Georgia) Battery. Martin’s Division, Brig.-Gen. W. T. Martin. First Brigade, Col. J. T. Morgan: First Alabama, Third Alabama, Lieut.-Col. T. H. Mauldin; Fifty-first Alabama, Eighth Confederate. Second Brigade, Col. A. A. Russell: Fourth Alabama (two regiments of same designation, Lieut.- Col. Johnson commanded that in Roddey’s Brigade), First Confederate, Col. W. B. Bate; Wiggin’s (Arkansas) Battery. Roddey’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. P. D. Roddey: Fourth Alabama (two regiments, etc., as above), Lieut.-Col. Wm. A. Johnson; Fifth Alabama, Fifty-third Ala- bama, Forrest’s (Tennessee) Regiment, Ferrell’s (Georgia) Battery. Forrest’s Cavalry Corps, Brig.-Gen. N. B. Forrest, commanding. Armstrong’s Division (from returns of August 31, 1863, and reports), Brig.-Gen. F. C. Armstrong. Armstrong’s Brigade, Col. J. T. Wheeler: Third Arkansas, First Tennessee, Highteenth Tennessee Battalion, Maj. Charles McDonald. Forrest’s Brigade, Col. G. G. Dibrell: Fourth Ten- nessee, Col. W. 8. McLemore; Highth Tennessee, Capt. Hamilton Mc- Ginnis; Ninth Tennessee, Col. J. B. Biffle; Tenth Tennessee, Col. N. N.614 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Cox; Eleventh Tennessee, Gol. D. W. Holman; Shaw’s (or Hamilton’s) Battalion (?), Maj. J. Shaw; Freeman’s (Tennessee) Battery, Capt. A. L. Huggins; Morton’s (Tennessee ) . Battery, Capt. John W. Morton. Pegram’s Division (taken from Pegram’s and Scott’s reports and as- signments ; but the composition of this division is uncertain ), Brig.-Gen. John Pegram. Davidson's Brigade, Brig.-Gen. H. B. Davidson: First Georgia, Sixth Georgia, Col. John R. Hart; Sixth North Carolina, Rucker’s Legion, Huwald’s (Tennessee ) Battery. Scott’s Brigade, Col. J. S. Scott: Tenth Confederate, Col. C. T. Goode; detachment of Mor- gan’s command, Lieut.-Col. R. B. Martin; First Louisiana, Second Ten- nessee, Fifth Tennessee, Twelfth Tennessee Battalion; Sixteenth T’ennes- see Battalion, Capt. J. Q. Arnold; Louisiana Battery (one section). THE ARMY OF TENNESSEE, GEN. JOSEPH E. JOHNSTON, COMMANDING. * Hardee’s Army Corps, Lieut.-Gen. Wm. J. Hardee, commanding. \ Brown’s Division, Maj.-Gen. John C. Brown. Smith's Brigade— i Brig.-Gen. James A. Smith; Florida Regiment, composed of First, Third, i Sixth, Seventh and Fourth Infantry and First Cavalry, dismounted (con- | solidated), Lieut.-Col. E. Mashburn; Georgia Regiment, composed of First, Fifty-seventh and Sixty-third Georgia Regiments (consolidated), Col. C. H. Olmstead; Georgia Regiment, composed of Fifty-fourth and AP ki Thirty-seventh Georgia and Fourth Georgia Battalion Sharpshooters. i (consolidated), Col. T. D. Caswell. Govan’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. D. C. 1 | Govan: Arkansas Regiment, composed of First, Second, Fifth, Sixth, | Seventh, Eighth, Thirteenth, Fifteenth, Nineteenth and Twenty-fourth | | Arkansas and Third Confederate (consolidated), Col. EK. A. Howell; Texas i) | Regiment, composed of Sixth, Seventh, Tenth, Fifteenth, Seventeenth, i ea Eighteenth, Twenty-fourth and Twenty-fitth Texas (consolidated), | } EN re agora care etilpaenins 6 Te . ei ee wv: ieee vee GF i Re ELE . os “> : 7 . eR en nag Ri a. wae renal AIDES ath i epiname E M A OE Os S ay : % - STR: ie Sa papa 2 aca dis Ca aT An Ve floret gc Lae Aenea emia Se Rtas: cme " Se sre ee NaI irae Fe es . so thy Sin A Gt et iE cer aga Sie ll ele Sunes ee oUF “ala = hla oe lope ih ais Talat a te Lieut.-Col. W. A. Ryan. | } i Hoke’s Division, Maj.-Gen. R. F. Hoke. Clingman’s Brigade: Kit Eighth North Carolina, Lieut.-Col. R. A. Barrier; Thirty-first North i | i) Carolina, Col. C. W. Knight; Thirty-sixth and Fortieth North Carolina, ne Hi Maj. W. A. Holland; Fifty-first North Carolina, Capt. J. W. Lippitt; Mie | Mi Sixty-first North Carolina, Capt. S. W. Noble. Colquitt’s Brigade: Ht Sixth Georgia, Maj. J. M. Culpepper; Nineteenth Georgia, Lieut.-Col. | R. B. Hogan; Twenty-third Georgia, Col. M. R. Ballinger; Twenty- Mt seventh @eoreia, Lieut.-Col. H. Bussey; Twenty-eighth Georgia, Capt. | | G. W. Warthen. Haygood’s Brigade: Eleventh South Carolina, Capt. iti B. F. Wyman; Twenty-first South Carolina, Capt. J. W. Thomas (prob- | ably Lieut.-Col. J. A. W. Thomas ) ; Twenty-fifth South Carolina, Capt. *Organization for period ending April 17, 1865.~~ 4 @ HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 615 EB. R. Lesesne; Twenty-seventh South Carolina, Capt. T. Y. Simons ; Seventh South Carolina Battalion, Capt. Wm. Clyburn. Kirkland’s Brigade: Seventeenth North Carolina, Lieut.-Col. T H. Sharp; Forty- second North Carolina, Col. J. E. Brown; Fiftieth North Carolina, Col. Geo. Wortham; Sixty-sixth North Carolina, Col. J. H. Nethercutt. First Brigade Junior Reserves: First North Corolina, Lieut.-Col. C. W. Broadfoot; Second North Carolina, Col. J. H. Anderson; Third North Carolina, Col. J. W. Hinsdale; First North Carolina Battalion, Capt. C. M. Hall. Cheatham’s Division, Maj.-Gen. B. F. Cheatham. Palmer’s Brigade: Field’s Regiment, First, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Sixteenth, Twenty-seventh, Twenty-eighth and Thirty-fourth Tennessee Regiments and ‘l'wenty- fourth Tennessee Battalion (consolidated), Lieut.-Col. O. A. Bradshaw; Rice’s Regiment, Eleventh, Tweltth, Thirteenth, Twenty-ninth, Forty- seventh, Fiftieth, Fifty-first, Fifty-second and One Hundred and Fifty- fourth Tennessee (consolidated), Lieut.-Col. W. A. Pease (?); Searey’s Regiment, Second, Third, Tenth, Fifteenth, Eighteenth, Twentieth, Twenty-sixth, Thirtieth, Thirty-second, Thirty-seventh and Forty-fitth Tennessee Regiments and Twenty-third Tennessee Battalion (consoli- dated), Col. A. Searcy; Tillman’s Regiment, Fourth, Fifth, Nineteenth, Twenty-fourth, Thirty-first, Thirty-third, Thirty-fitth Thirty-eighth, and Forty-first ‘Tennessee (consolidated), Col. J. D. Tillman. Gist’s Brigade: Forty-sixth Georgia, Capt. A. Miles; Sixty-fifth Georgia and Second and Eighth Georgia Battalions (consolidated), Col. W. G. Foster; Sixteenth and Twenty-fourth South Carolina (consolidated ), Maj. B. B. Smith. Stewart’s Army Corps, Lieut.-Gen. A. P. Stewart, commanding. Loring’s Division, Ma}.-Gen. W. W. Loring. Featherston’s Brigade. First Arkansas; First, Second, Fourth, Ninth and Twenty-fitth Arkansas (consolidated); Third, Thirty-first and Fortieth Mississippi (consoli dated); First, Twenty-second and Thirty-third Mississippi and First Battalion (consolidated). Lowry’s Brigade: Twelfth Louisiana, Capt. J. A. Dixon; Fifth, Fourteenth and Forty-third Mississippi (consolidat- ed); Sixth, Fifteenth, Twentieth and Twenty-third Mississippi (consoli- dated). Shelley’s Brigade: Sixteenth, Thirty-third and Forty-fifth Ala- / bama (consolidated ) ; Twenty-seventh Alabama; Twenty-seventh, Thirty- fifth, Forty-ninth, Fifty-fifth and Fifty-seventh Alabama (consolidated), Lieut.-Col. Daniel (probably J. W.L. Daniel, of the Fifteenth Alabama). Anderson’s Division, Maj.-Gen. Patton Anderson. Elliott’s Brigade: Twenty-second Georgia Artillery Battalion, Maj. M. J. McMullen; Twenty-seventh Georgia Battalion, Maj. A. L. Hartridge; Second Southaaa: SATO ON i ; ; " a a aN pa _ a ~ canine ——— — rr = a ~ me age 616 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Carolina Artillery, Maj. F. F. Warley; | Manigault’s Battalion, Lieut. H. Rhett’s Brigade: First South Carolina, Maj. T. A. Huguenin; K latte. First South Carolina Battalion, Maj. ode oueas: Walthall’s Division, Maj.-Gen. B. C. Walthall. Artillery, Tieut.-Col. J. A Wates: Tee Harrison’s Brigade: First Georgia Regulars, Fifth Georgia, Fifth Georgia Reserves, Maj. C. K. McGregor; Forty-seventh ner’s Br igade: Second South C Thirty-second Georgia, Lieut. -Col. E. Hi. Baconv as Georgia and Bonaud’s Battalion (consolidated ). Carolina Volunteers, composed of Second hyn. and Twentieth South Carolina and Blanchard’s Reserves (consolidated) ; Jarolina Volunteers, composed of Third and Eighth Regi- Third South ments, Third South Carolina Battalion and Blanchard’s Reserves (con- solidated ) ; and Fifteenth South Carolina and Blanchard’s Reserves (consolidated). Lee’s Army Corps, Lieut.-Gen. S. D. Lee, commanding. Hill’s Division, Maj.-Gen. D. H. Hill. J. H. Sharp: eighth and Thirty-fourth Kighth Mississippl Battalion ( ? Seventh South Carolina Volunteers, composed of Seventh Sharp’s Brigade, Brig.-Gen. Fourteenth Alabama, composed. of Twenty-fourth, Twenty- Alabama “9 (consolidated ), Col. J. ©. Carter \, composed of Third Mississippi Bat- talion, and Fifth, Eighth and Thirty-second Mississipp1 Regiments (consolidated ), Capt. J. Y. Carmack; Ninth Mississippi, composed of Ninth Battalion Mississippi Sharpshooters, and Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, Forty-first VOL aWe C: and Nineteenth South Carolina (consolidated ), Brantley’s Brigade, eth Alabama (consolidated), Col. H. bama (consolidated ), Thirty-fourth Mississippi (consolidated ), Col. Stevenson’s Division, Maj.-Gen. C. L. Stevenson. gade: dated), and Forty-fourth 2ichards; Nineteenth South Carolina, composed of Tenth Mississippi Brig.-Gen. Col. J. A. Minter: posed of Twenty-fourth, Twenty-seventh, I R. Regiments (consolidated ), Maj. James O. Farrell. W. EF. Brantley: bama, composed of Twenty-second, Twenty-fitth, Thirty-ninth and Fifti- Thirty-seventh Ala- bama, composed of Thirty-seventh, Forty-second and Fifty-fourth Ala- T. Toulmin; Twenty -ninth, Twenty-second Ala- Twenty-fourth Mississippi, com- PI Thirtieth and W. Williamson; Fifty- eighth North Carolina, composed of Fiftieth and Sixtieth North Carolina (consolidated ). Henderson’s Bri- First Georgia (Confederate) Battalion, composed of First (Con- federate) Georgia Regiment, First Battalion Georgia Sharpshooters, Twenty-fifth, Twenty-ninth, Thirtieth and Sixty-sixth Georgia ( consoli- Capt. W. J. Whitsitt; Thirty-ninth Georgia, composed of nine companies of Thir ty-fourth Georgia, SIX companies of Fifty- sixth Geor gla and all of Vhirty-ninth Georgia, Lieut.-Col. We i Malton: Fortieth_ oll f ad HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 617 Georgia Battalion, composed of Fortieth, Forty-First and Forty-third Georgia (consolidated), Lieut.-Col. W. H. Dunnall; Forty-second Georgia, composed of ten companies of Forty-second Georgia, ten com- panies of Thirty-sixth Georgia, two companies of Fifty-sixth Georgia and one company of Thirty-fourth and Thirty-sixth Georgia, Lieut.-Col. L. P. Thomas. Pettus’ Brigade: Nineteenth Alabama, Lieut.-Col. E. 8. Gulley; Twentieth Alabama, Lieut.-Col. J. K. Elliott (belonged to Thir- tieth Alabama); Twenty-third Alabama, Maj. J. T. Hester; Fifty-fourth Virginia Battalion, Lieut.-Col. C. H. Lynch. Stewart’s Artillery Corps. R. B. Bhett’s Battalion; Anderson’s Battery, Capt. R. W. (?) Ander- son; Brook’s Battery (probably Terrel Artillery); Le Gardeurs’ Battery, Capt. G. Le Gardeur; Parker’s Battery, Capt. Ed L. Parker; Stuart’s Battery, Capt. H. M. Stuart; Wheaton’s Battery, Capt. J. F. Wheaton. Lee’s Corps: Kanapaux’s Battery, Capt. J. T. Kanapaux. 4 CHARTER) XVI TENNESSEE LITERATURE—A CATALOGUE OF THE LEADING LITERARY MEN AND WOMEN OF THE STATE, WITH THE TITLES OF THEIR PRODUCTIONS, AND WITH ANALYTICAL REVIEWS OF STYLES, METHODS AND GENERAL MERITS; TO- GETHER WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PRESENTATION OF THE ORIGIN, SUCCESS AND VARIATION OF THE STATE PRESS. HE activities of the pioneer intellect at the period of the earliest settlement of Tennessee were engrossed in what was of more 1m- mediate importance than the writing of history. Prior thereto a glimpse of the people and of the physical geography of the mountainous section of the State may be had in a rare and valuable old book published in London in 1775, ‘‘Adair’s History of the American Indians.” Adair, as an Indian trader, was among the Cherokees of Hast’ Tennessee a long time before the French and Indian War, when the fierce and haughty Cherokee warriors ruled the land “untrammeled and alone.” A map accompanying the volume calls the Tennessee River the Tanase. ‘The men of action—the heroes who planted the white race in this hot-bed of aboriginal hostility, in the latter part of the eighteenth and the earlier part of the nineteenth century, were too much engrossed by the sword to find much time for the pen. The list of Tennessee authors found in works devoted to that subject «Prepared for this work by “ Mary Faith Floyd” of Knoxville, and by others.618 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. i is not so large as that of other Southern States. It has been said, “The a : f ot pas alt fame of a great man needs time to give 1t perspective. ! tially true of authors, and it remains for the future biographer, after time has done its work in giving due perspective to the great minds of . : : . ee r oe es ° Ht our State, to do justice to the merits and works of Tennessee’s eminent fi , This is essen- if i A literary laborers. Among writers historians may well be mentioned may: | first. Judge John Haywood is earliest on the list. The son of a farmer of Halifax County, N. C., he had no opportunity for collegiate education, but learned some Latin and Greek and studied law, beginning with the study of ‘Reynolds’ Reports,” thence advancing from particulars to gen- ee 3 oT a ame cake . ° ~e ” be . 1 9 i i ; i eral principles. He became attorney-general of North Carolina in 1794, | and soon afterward judge of the superior court of law and equity. In | 1800 he returned to legal practice. Judge Haywood removed to Tennes- al . 2 ° Me clit see in 1807, and located seven miles south of Nashville. He was fond pal } SEY, eh res ng onencaerar jar ns Tae — lene wal nF Baki om of applause; became judge of the Supreme Court of Tennessee in 1816. | Mr. Hiram Barry (the oldest printer in the State), who was personally acquainted with Judge Haywood, says, ‘‘He was of low stature and very cor- Wey | pulent.” He wrote a very dificult hand to read, and Mr. Barry who set ; tae . * . * c ne 3 = | the type in the printing of “Haywood’s History,” was the only printer who ft << a . - Hl | could decipher it. Judge Haywood was author of “ Natural and Abo- | | | riginal History of Tennessee,” “‘ History of Tennessee from 1770 to 1795,” wit | “The Evidences of Christianity.” ‘‘ Haywood’s History” is written in | | | i narrative style without rhetorical ornament, and it is not always as clear | as the relation of historic events ought to be. It contains a mass of val- Af Ht uable materials relative to early events and it is now arare book. The ie mistake is made of locating Fort Loudon on the north side of the Little ; Tennessee. It was situated on the south side of that stream.* | Dr. J. G. M. Ramsey was of Scotch descent. His father was a gal- | lant soldier of the Revolutionary war, fighting under Gen. Washington at at Valley Forge, Trenton and Princeton. Dr. Ramsey was born in Knox County, six miles east of Knoxville, in 1797, and died in that place in | ih 1884, in his eighty-eighth year. He lies buried at Mecklenburg, four 14 | i miles east of Knoxville, at the confluence of the Tennessee and French ii Broad Rivers. He read medicine under Dr. Joseph Strong, was gradu- ated in the University of Pennsylvania, and was a practitioner most of Wt his lite. In the late war, being an ardent secessionist, he was compelled to leave the State during Federal occupation in 1863-65. He went to | North Carolina and remained there some years. In 1853 he brought out his ‘Annals of Tennessee,” a valuable compend of history up to the close of the eighteenth century. He had the manuscripts of the second volume *See Aboriginal map accompanying this volume.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 619 ready for the printer, but tho family residence, while he was in exile, was burnt, and with it the manuscripts and many valuable papers. Dr. Ramsey ranks high as an author. He was a polished and fluent writer, and. possessed. a large fund of information op all subjects. ‘Annals of Tennessee” is a store-house of knowledge to the future historian. It evinces much research and is very accurate and reliable. He was also the author of many elegant addresses, essays and poems. For some years he was president of the Historical Society of Tennessee. A. Waldo Putnam published in Nashville, in 1859, Putnam's “ His- tory of Middle Tennessee, or Life and Times of Gen. James Robertson.”’ It appears from the title page that Mr. Putnam was president of the Tennessee Historical Society. He was born in Belfast, Ohio, in 1799, and was graduated at the University of Ohio. He wrote the sketch of Gen. John Sevier in “‘Wheeler’s History of North Carolina,” and a volume entitled “Life and Times of John Sevier.” Mr. Putnam married a de- scendant of Gen. Sevier. The preface to “ History of Middle Tennes- see” is pleasing and somewhat fanciful. The work is a comprehensive account of the settlement of the Cumberland Valley, and abounds in the incidents and dangers that follow life in the wilderness. In addition to the historical works mentioned is Clayton’s ‘‘ History of Davidson Coun- ty, Tennessee,” an important and valuable work, giving much detailed and statistical information. “Military Annals of Tennessee » is the title of an octavo volume con- taining 882 pages of closely printed matter, recently issued under the supervision of Dr. J. Berrien Lindsley. The first part comprises two very brief, generalized accounts of the war in Tennessee, ably written by J. M. Keating, of Memphis, and A. P. Stewart, of Mississippi. The re- mainder of the volume consists of regimental records so. full of mistakes and so manifestly incomplete as to bar the volume from its probable de- sign of representing fully the splendid Confederate history of the State. The preparation of the volume was apparently a financial enterprise. As early as 1834 Eastin Morris brought out “Tennessee Gazetteer, or Topographical Dictionary” of the State of Tennessee. It is a valu- able compendium of the history of the State, from earliest times to 1834, including the constitution of ‘Tennessee framed by the convention of 1834. A second edition of this book was published in Nashville, ac- companied by ample foot notes. Paschall is the author of ‘“‘Old Times, or Tennessee History,” a work for schools. Knowing the love children have for “‘story-reading,” Pas- chall has arranged historic facts in a most agreeable form. Rach chap- ter, as far as possible, has a beginning and ending, and by this means: : adetnamette Ee te, Sale ee Ar or re ER BERD UE RC ag RT i SoM eR EET ts ae if bert il aa} Ce a = — — er ne ee = Sret Fin. ie 2) ae, ee Ce Gee eT a a eee ane “ ~ ao . s none oe . -- —_ aie = - s : 2 nd = 8 whe a = - - ~ . a : : ——_ maren ee > z a ae hk = 5 aa z in ie = e ee age cote i : : = aia To Zul = = : = haceeindlltemncteaiinasiigemmtin..cc Se aap th lie Sibheaa sch — v = nee . 2 oO ee Se TEA aa . a ee ee : Sara en ee a ee ee a ee ESSE YY eh EY PS LE A 626 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. > two volumes; ‘Christian Growth” and! author of “California Sketches,’ and its Methods” is a vol- “The Class Meeting.” ‘The Sunday-school Nashville, 1883, by Rev. James A. Lyons, a native of ume published at Knoxville, Tenn., a minister of the Methodist Episcopal Church South. Sut Lovingood’s Yarns,” a humorous book, George W. Harris, author of “‘t was born in Knoxville, Tenn. His book had a wide popularity, especially among young readers. Legal writers are Hon. cery Reports,” reported and ed of “Hicks’ Manual;” William C. Kain, author of “Tennessee Justice and Legal Adviser,” and Henry S. Foote, author of ‘‘Foote’s Bench and Bar of the Southwest.” “A Review of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, or an Essay on Slavery,” 1s the: work of A. Woodward, Wit 1D). published in Cineinnati in 1853. Dr. Woodward lived in Knoxville for many years where he practiced his His little book is very credit- William F. Cooper, author of “‘Cooper’s Chan- ited by himself; Wesley J. Hicks; author’ profession, and has left a large family. able, and the views on Southern customs and the estimate of character are just and impartial. ‘Old Times in West Tennessee,” published in Memphis, 1873, and copyrighted by Joseph S. Williams in the same year, is a book by “A Descendant of One of the First Settlers.” The most prominent of the female authors of Tennessee is Miss Mary N. Murfree, whose pseudonym 1s Charles Egbert Craddock. Miss Mur- free is a native of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Loss of property induced her father, who is a prominent lawyer, to live on the old Dickenson planta- tion. | It was the isolated life there that led the young girl to reflection and introspection, and developed her keen observation of nature’s mys- teries, which plumed her pen for its exquisite descriptions of scenery. Miss Murfree touches the very core of nature and reveals all her hidden lore, presenting 1 to the reader in gorgeous coloring. Many visits to» the mountains of East Tennessee made her familiar with the customs and dialect of the mountaineers. This practical knowledge, added to the wealth of imagination she possesses, formed the conjunction necessary All the prominent journals of the country accord She is said to be the ‘‘most to perfect the genius. the very highest praise to Miss Murfree. powertul and original of the ‘southern school’ of romanticists.”’ the Boston Traveller: “Here is the positive, brilliant, glowing genius Says. that has cut its own channel and made its own place.” Her productions are “In the Tennessee Mountains,” “Down the Ravine,” “The Prophet: of the Great Smoky Mountains” and many other contributions to period-- icals: also “Where the Battle was Fought.” The publication of her first. work enti *, justly he fr rank ¢ i entitled her, justly, to the front rank among novelists, and her merit,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 627 is acknowledged by all lovers of the beautiful, who look on her produc- tions as a new voice of delight in the world of fiction. Mrs. L. Virginia French was by birth a Virginian. At an early age she was sent by her father to her maternal grandmother in Washington, Penn., where she was educated. In 1848, having finished her education, she became a teacher in Memphis. Her maiden nom de plume was L? Inconnue. She published, in 1856, “Wind Whispers,” a book of fugi- tive poems; “Legends of the South,” in verse; “Iztalilxo. the Lady of Tala,” a tragedy in five acts, the scene laid in Mexico: ‘“My Roses,” a novel of Southern life in 1872. In 1879. ‘“Darlingtonia,” a novel, ran as a serial in the Detroit /ree Press. She occupied the position of ed- itor to many prominent literary journals of the South. - She is best known as a poet. Her verse is full of tone and imagination, and her drama has been compared to “Ion” and “The Lady of Lyons.” She led a life of excessive literary activity and usefulness. She died at Mc- Minnville, March 31,1881. Since her death her sister, Mrs. Lide Meri- weather, also an authoress, has published a volume of poems entitled ‘“‘One or Two,” the joint work of these gifted sisters. Mrs. Meriweather re- sided in Memphis for many years, and at that time published two books, “Soundings” and “Souls for Sale.” “Soundings,” a prose work, was written with the noble endeavor to elevate and restore to honest effort those who, by one false step, are tossed by custom into the bitter oulf of degradation, without one hope of repentance or of restoration to a more upright career, to which some might attain if the hand-grasp of pitying women was held out tothem. Mrs. Meriweather is also a poet of ability. “October” is a handsome specimen of suggestive style. Mrs. Annie Chambers Ketchum was born in Kentucky, and removed to Memphis after her marriage. While there, she became the editor of the Lotos, a literary magazine. In 1856 she brought out a novel, “ Nelly Bracken” which was favorably received; ‘“ Rilla Motto,” a romance writ- ten for the Zotos in 1860; “Lotos Flowers,” a volume of miscellaneous poems. ‘‘Benny,” a Christmas ballad which appeared in the Home Journal, attracted much attention. Besides literary ability and rare no- bility of nature, Mrs. Ketchum is gifted with beauty, fine conversational powers and a voice of great compass and sweetness. Her teacher, Prof. Wright Merrick, says: “In the classics, in the sciences, she is equally at home; in modern languages, music and drawing she excels as well. I have never known her peer.” She has traveled in Europe recently, and is still actively engaged in literary work. Mrs. Adelia C. Graves, nee Spencer, wife of Z. C. Graves, president at that time of Kingsville Academy, and founder of Mary Sharpe Col-ee DIR ATE EES OE A oe we ee Oe ae eanpeeapeer “i ae wiaaemaaeage Angier is IN Cy SeBiticson weiner — i e [a rraner . Sa as eee oS > = a aa gs oT ne SRL ST ae fis a ei nde ck an esa. 2 ei ES pa ie RE - mag Rees Remorse ARS cee arE Pe: nee ye a Seta maa cope ion meee oe en, — enna a APNE ce a SS Tio TP = Sacer: — noms my . FER = “cares ; = ' Sali SS a amet aos Sacer as ‘? er wea ee ae = ~3 : a see AN Aes ea ie “ tes Sees cs soepe = Rovindensteomesinn : =. ‘ -- mcr wwe pes ese See =o 3 are eI men Mis er . enero j : epee : 7 ke 143 i Tan Ae 1 iH ~~ STALE jae Sen IS enti aire ras:. ee Kit Sigs an Sih tid emi (ie gaat oe pay fame Se er np 3 5 ~ ee em eee i oes, — Pps oman | sarnaeat ~ - sae “ < mero pe = ae an ed sca Peano amasco™ a B28 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. lege, Winchester, Tenn., is an authoress. She was for some time pro- fessor of Latin and belles-lettres and afterward matron and professor of rhetoric in the Winchester College. She has written many fugitive poems and two prose tales, ‘Ruined Lives,” published in the South- ern Repository, Memphis, and a drama, ‘“Jephtha’s Daughter.” She had also a work on “Woman; her Education, Aims, Sphere, Influence and Destiny.”’ Mrs. Mary E. Pope, Memphis, for some time principal of a flourish- ing school for young ladies, is the authoress of fugitive poems; one entitled “The Gift of Song.” Martha W. Brown, who wrote under the pseudonym of Estelle, resided in Memphis. She contributed numerous poems to The Southern Literary Messenger; ‘“‘Thou Art Growing Old, Mother,” is said to be the very essence of the poetry of the heart. Mrs. Amanda Bright was born in Alabama and removed early in life to Fayetteville, Tenn. Her eldest son was killed at the battle of Seven Pines. Soon thereafter her second and only remaining child died. In her great sorrow she wrote a book, hoping to realize a sufficient sum to erect a monument to her sons’ memory. “The Three Bernices, or Ansermo of the Crag”’ was the outcome of this design, published in 1869. Mrs. Bright has vivid imagination, richness and exuberance of style, and she paints nature with the rare and delicate touches of a true artist. She wrote other stories, ‘‘The Prince of Seir’”’ among them. Miss Annie E. Law, long a resident of Tennessee, is of English birth and now lives in California. She is a woman of great force of will, strong intellect and unflinching courage. She gave valuable aid in the war to the Confederates, to whose cause she was a devoted adherent. She was tried as a spy at Knoxville inthe war. She is authoress of many poems, one of the best being ‘‘Memories.” Miss Law is alsoa learned concholo- gist, and has made many valuable contributions to that science. In 1867 Miss Zoda G. Smith published from the Southern Method- ist Publishing House at Nashville, under the nom de plume of ‘ Elloie,”’ a small volume of poems. Her verse is said to contain nothing morbid or insipid, but to elevate the heart, broken by earthly trials, into the purer atmosphere and brighter skies of heaven. Mrs. Bettie Meriwether, a great apostle of temperance, wrote a fine novel of much power, entitled She is a resi- “A Memoir of Hugh Lawson White,” judge of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, and United States Senator, with selections “The Master of Redleaf,’ which was favorably received. dent of Memphis. from his speeches and correspondence, was published in 1856, by his Mrs. Emma M. Blake, nee Rut- She married Mr. granddaughter, Miss Nancy N. Scott. ledge, native of Nashville, and was educated there.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 629 Daniel Blake, an Englishman, a resident of Charleston, S.C. A vol- ume of her poems was printed by her friends after her death, as a memorial of her, entitled “Reliquie.” Mrs. W. G. McAdoo is the author of two novels, ‘‘The Nereid” and ‘ Hagle-Bend,” the scenes laid in Kast Tennessee, and a number of serial stories. Mrs. Annie S. Gil- christ, of Nashville, is authoress of two novels of considerable merit, ‘“Rosehurst” and ‘ Harcourt,” both published in Nashville. Mrs. Jane Tandy Chinn Cross was a native of Kentucky, but pub- lished her books in Nashville. She was twice married, and died in 1870. While on a European tour, she corresponded with The Nashville Christian Advocate. She began writing for publication in 1851. Wrote a book of four volumes for children, and ‘Duncan Adair, or Captured in Escap- ing” and “‘Azile, A Story,” Nashville, 1868. ‘Azile” is a very interesting story, the scene of the first part laid in Dresden, and changing to the Southern States at the outbreak of the war. MHer style is polished, sprightly and lucid. Her portraiture of life in the South is graphic, and there are some fine art touches on German customs and amusements. Mrs. Whitson, resident of Murfreesboro, has published general biograph- ical works. The most important is a book of sketches of the last Gen- eral Assembly, which contains very flattering accounts of its members. JOURNALISM. * The first paper brought out in Tennessee was The Knoxville Gazette, which was published at Rogersville, November 5, 1791, by Mr. George Roulstone. The Gazette was a three-column paper of no great merit, and of little interest to the general reader; yet as the pioneer paper of the new region, it created quite an excitement among the rough settlers. It is supposed that Indian troubles prevented Mr. Roulstone from estab- lishing his paper at once in Knoxville. Although this town was laid out in 1792, many people regarded it as a myth, and the editor of The Gazette may have shared this belief. He, however, removed his paper after the issuance of a few numbers at Rogersville, and continued to publish it in Knoxville until his death, in 1804. Roulstone was printer to the Ter- ritorial and State Legislatures, and published Willie Blount’s “‘Catachet- ical Exposition of the Constitution of the State of Tennessee.” He was public printer at the time of his death, and his wife was elected two suc- cessive terms to fill his place. She was Miss Gilliam, of Nashville, and has left many descendants in Middle Tennessee. Knoxville’s second paper was The Knoxville Register, a weekly issue founded by G. Roulstone in 1798. The Register was in existence about a eR ay eee . Ree med he eee } *Much of the fact contained in the above sketch on the subject of journalism was kindly furnished by Col. Moses White.eae we i ant shi ee eS a Face seat 630 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. two years when its editors G. Roulstone and John Rivington Parrington, published another paper called The Genius of Liberty, a small paper not so large as either of the former, and by no means so sprightly in tone. This made Knoxville the mistress of three weeklies, a fine exhibition for a little frontier town in its babyhood. In 1804 George Wilson edited a paper known as Wilson’s Gazette, a much larger paper than its prede- cessors. It had five columns and ruled lines while the earlier issues had three columns and no lines. This paper continued until 1818 when Wil- son removed to Nashville and published The Nashville Gazette, a paper devoted to ‘“‘Old Hickory’s”’ service. The Knoxville Register, “the one that became an institution of Knox- ville,’ was established by F. S. Heiskill and Hu. Brown in August, 1816. Maj. Heiskill came to Knoxville, in 1814, where he served ‘as journeyman printer on Wilson's Gazette, then the only paper published in East Tennessee.” He was a man of limited opportunities but strong native capacities and managed the political department of The Register with much ability. Hu. Brown was an accomplished scholar and fluent writer, and he conducted the miscellaneous and literary parts of the paper with skill and success. In the bitter party strife which rent the country in the presidential campaign of Gen. Jackson and John Q. Adams The Register entered with vigor and enthusiasm, and bore a prominent part in that political storm. It also supported Judge Hugh L. White for President in 1836. Between 1836 and 1839 The Register changed owners and editors several times, as well as names. Its existence con- tinued, with many vicissitudes, until after 1863, when it succumbed to the exigencies of the war. Up to 1859 The Register had been a Whig paper. In that year it became a strong Democratic sheet. Another paper, The Enquirer, began in Knoxville in 1823. Like other journals of this region it went through many changes of owners and editors. At one time Mr. Hiram Barry was its owner and publisher with J. J. Meredith as editor. Mr. Barry is a resident of Knoxville and the oldest printer in the State, he having come to that place in 1816. He is still an active citizen who can tell many interesting incidents of early affairs in Tennessee. As Knoxville grew other papers had their rise. The Hon. John RK. Nelson, a distinguished lawyer, issued two papers, The Republican in 1831 and Uncle Sam in 1834. The Post was first brought out in Knoxville, in 1841, by Capt. James Williams. It was afterward removed to Athens and still continues there as The Athens Post, edited by Mr. Samuel P. Ivins. The Argus appeared in 1838. It was changed to Standard in 1844, and continued, with some changes, to 1855.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 631 The Plebeian began as a Democratic weekly in 1850, and in 1851 was known as The Daily Morning Plebeian. This was the first daily ever published in Knoxville. Other minor papers flourished from 1853 to 1857; and in 1858 Mr. John Mitchel, the Irish patriot, and Mr. W. G. Swan, of Knoxville, established an ultra pro-slavery paper called The Southern Citizen. Mr. Mitchel was a man of liberal education, polite address and keen wit, added to much boldness and independence of char- acter. Says a critic, ‘The Southern Citizen was conducted with ability, arrogance and intolerance seldom equaled.” The war journals of Knoxville were The Hast Tennesseean, published by the Hon. John Baxter, as principal, in February, 1862, and The Southern Chronicle. The East Tennesseean was devoted to the support of the Confederate States in their war for independence. It had but one issue. The Southern Chronicle fell in 1863, on Federal occupation. Rogersville, in 1816,had a newspaper called The Rogersville Gazette, and in 1850, The Rogersville Times was a lively and enterprising journal. Other towns in Kast Tennessee were not behind in publishing papers. Green- ville had, in 1822, an eight-paged paper entitled The American Economist and Weekly Political Recorder, followed by The Miscellany and The Greeneville Spy, which continued until the war. The first paper ever published southwest of Knoxville, was The Val- ley Farmer, in Washington, Rhea County. This was removed subse- quently to Athens, under the name of Athens Gazette. In 1833 J. W. M. Brazeale, the author of “‘ Life as it is,” edited The Tennessee Journal at this place. As early as 1838, New Market had a paper; and in 1832, Jonesboro issued a Whig paper, called The Washington Republican and Farmers’ Journal,edited by Judge Emerson, of the supreme court, and The Sentinel by Dr. Thomas Anderson, author of a medical work on diseases peculiar to Hast Tennessee. W. G. Brownlow edited his well known Whig at that time in Jonesboro, and between the two papers a political and personal feud raged with unabated fury for a long period. Chattanooga, then known as Ross’s Landing, had a paper called The Hamilton Gazette as early as 1838. The name was changed afterward to The Chattanooga Gazette. This paper passed through some vicissitudes until 1864, when it became a daily issue. Hlizabethton Republican and Manufacturers’ Advocate was the first paper published in Elizabethton. This was succeeded by Brownlow’s Tennessee Whig, begun at this place in 1839. The Whig was bold, intense, incisive, and continued one year, when it was removed to Jonesboro, and subsequently to Knoxville. In 1849 Brownlow’s Knoxville Whig sent out its first issue and continued until suspended October 16, 1861, and revived Nevember 11, S65q0 in632 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ship in 1875, at which time the paper bore the new name of Daily Chron- icle and Weekly Whig and Chronicle. The motto of the Whig, “Cry Hl aloud and spare not,” gave full insight into the spirit of the paper. The H | ny Whig bore, at one time, the title Independent Journal, and Brownlow’ s Knoxville Whig and Rebel Ventilator. No paper ever had a wider cireu- i lation. It is said to have had a circulation of 10,000 in 1855. The Knowx- | Y 1869 Brownlow dissolved connection with this paper and resumed editor- ha 7 eee ee . ~ ome een a pt agp aa | as HR ’ ville Chronicle was established in 1870, by Mr. William Rule, the pres. (Fri Hi Hi Al ent able editor of The Journal. Cleveland, Maryville, Madisonville, a i Hh Kingston and Jasper had weekly papers from an early date. Besides i il i these there were two literary journals published in the University of i Tennessee, and a temperance organ existed for a short while in 1854, in i, Knoxville, published by Mr. Joe Lewis and J. A. Rayl. ene Two papers deserve mention— The Railroad Advocate of Rogersville, ee a te ee > 2 Tlie anata igs shat ‘ nat aos CHE Sea | | | | aan | in 1831, devoted to collecting all available information about the re- fF sources of this favored region, so as to arouse the people to the need of i an outlet for the immense agricultural and mineral wealth of the State. {" Since then the riches have been developed beyond all expectation. The other was a veritable abolition paper, called The Genius of Universal Emancipation. This was published at Greeneville in 1821 by Benjamin t Lundy, a native of New Jersey, of Quaker parentage, and showed that at the South existed the spark of what afterward proved to be one of the fiercest fires of fanaticism that ever swept over a nation. The paper advocated emancipation, and proposed several curious plans for effecting Si ————— the liberation of slaves. A few religious papers finish the list of papers in Kast Tennessee. Journalism began in Nashville in 1797, when a paper was published called The Tennessee Gazette and Mero District Advertiser, by a Ken- tucky printer named Henkle. In a year this paper was sold and the name changed to The Clarion. An issue of the date of 1801 is preserved by the State Historical Society. Its ragged condition shows its age. “Tt is a folio sheet, with pages 10x14 inches, and four columns to the | page, printed in pica type.” The Clarion was enlarged under the name Mt of Clarion and Tennessee Gazette, and other changes of heading until | December, 1821, when it resumed the name of The Clarion. ‘The price of subscription varied from $2 to $3 in advance, or $3 to $4, paya- able after six months.” In 1824 The Clarion was discontinued, and its owners, Abram P. Maury and Carey A. Harris, brought out The Nash- ville Republican. Bradford, the long-time printer of The Clarion, issued from’ that office, in 1808, Bradford’s Tennessee Almanac. The Impar- tial Review and Cumberland Repository appeared in the latter part of ‘Sorcha eee cuenta earanestitiiein it eng tinea aa = on, = OY — Pn ET I AE ANHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 633 1805. A number is in preservation bearing date February 1, 1806, in which is announced the death of Charles Dickenson, who fell in a duel fought with Gen. Jackson. The Museum, begun by Mr. G. Bradford, was a literary monthly, published in 1809, and existed for six months. It contained much valuable political and historical information, and was circulated at the low price of $2 per year. Rev. David Lowry published the first Cumberland Presbyterian organ in the United States. It bore the name of The Religious and Literary Intelligencer. It was a weekly brought out in 1830 and existed nearly two years. Following this was The Nashville Herald, in 1831, owned by Mr. W. Tannehill. This paper was of brief continuance. Next came a weekly literary paper in 1833 of quarto form, named The Kaleidoscope. Its tone was lofty and its influence elevating, but unfortunately its dura- tion was short. The Commercial Transcript, a small commercial sheet, came out in 1835; and after two years it became The Banner and Whig. 5 An “Association of ,Gentlemen” published in the years 1835-36 a Presbyterian paper named The American Presbyterian, which was not sustained. The Cumberland Magazine, a quarterly, was edited by the Rev. James Smith. This man was a Scotch Presbyterian, and wrote a history in defense of that church; a very able work. The Revivalist, a weekly, began in 1837, and changed to The Cumberland Presbyterian, but only a few numbers were issued. Tennessee Baptist of the First Baptist Church in Nashville, a monthly, existed from 1835 to 1837, when it changed owners and became a semi-monthly. The Old Baptist Ban- ner, 1838, was published by the Rev. Washington Lowe. It was a monthly paper. The Christian Review, a monthly magazine, was the Campbellite organ, published between the years 1844-46. In 1840 The Tennessee State Agriculturist began and continued to 1846. A valuable law journal, called The Southwestern Law Journal and Reporter, was published in 1844 and edited by William Cameron and John T. 8. Fall. E. Z GC. Judson and A. H. Kidd edited, in 1844, The Southwest- ern Literary Journal and Monthly Review. The Ba ptist, second paper of that name, a weekly, was published by C. K. Winston, J. H. Shep- herd and J. H. Marshall January, (844-47. The Daily Orthopolitan was edited by Mr. Wilkins Tannehill. This was a daily which began in 1845 and continued one year. The Christian Record, under the dominion of the Presbyterian Synod, began in 1846 and continued under changes until 1850, when it was removed to Kentucky. A monthly, called The Naturalist, was issued in 1846 for one year, and was devoted to education and literature. The Quarterly Review of the Methodist Episcopal Church South began in 1846, in Louisville,SSS ee MN cree 2k S ae BOA aligns Sn cena armen as Silliness ~ suaibchcdetpsbteeeen sees 2 pe ea ieee wae as A a iat A Th ae ae ao eiataciessentienie ena — a en na Rp Pe a NE I A LS I RLS AS TEE 634 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Ky. In 1851 it was removed to Richmond, Va., and to Nashville in 1858 Dr. T. O. Summers was the able editor of this periodical. The Tennessee Farmer and Horticulturist, a monthly, was edited by Charles Foster, in 1846. A temperance paper, The Tennessee Organ, was estab- lished in 1847, by Rev. John P. Campbell. eral hands it was disposed of to Dr. R. Thompson, and Gen. William G. Brien, an eloquent speaker and scholar of much ability, who conducted After passing through sey- it until it was discontinued in 1854. The Southern Ladies’ Companion, a Methodist monthly, was successfully managed, and had a large circula- tion. It was edited by Mr. Henkle and Dr. J. B. McFerrin. The Ten- nessee Baptist, edited by Rey. Dr. Howell, and The Portfolio, a Free- mason monthly, edited by Mr. W. Tannehillin 1847, were ably conducted. The Christian Magazine, edited in 1848 by Rev. Jesse B. Ferguson and J. K. Howard, and The Western Boatman, by Anson Nelson, The Even- ing Reporter in 1849-50, and The Nashville Times in 1849, were other publications of that period. The Naturalist, The Southern Agricultur- ist, The Nashville Journal of Medicine and Surgery and The Southwest- ern Monthly, went through brief life in Nashville in 1849-52. The Ladies’ Pearl, a monthly, was edited between 1852-56 by Rey. W. S. Lang- don and J. C. Provine, and afterward by Mrs. Langdon. The Nashville The Southern Medical Journal of Medical and Physical Sciences, a bi-monthly was published 1853-57. Evening News existed in 1851-53. The Banner of Peace, a.Cumberland Presbyterian paper, continued from 1840 to the recent war. edited by Dr. W. P. Jones; The Gospel Advocate, a weekly in the same The Parlor Visitor,-in 1854, a Baptist organ, year, edited by Elder Tolbert Fanning and Prof. William Lipscomb, and The Southern Baptist Review in 1855, were well conducted papers. The Home Circle, Rey. L. D. Houston, editor, and The Sunday-School Visitor, with Dr. T. O. Summers, editor, were other religious issues of 1855. culturist and Commercial Journal appeared in 1855 and lasted a short time. Two agricultural papers, The Farmer's Banner and The Agri- The Fountain was a sprightly temperance paper in 1855, and The Tennessee Farmer and Mechanic lasted about one year. The Nashville Daily News began in 1857, and discontinued in 1860. The Baptist Family Visitor, and Harper’s Theatrical Bulletin issued a few numbers in 1857. The Legislative Union and American was said to The Daily Chris- tian Advocate, a Methodist paper, and The Christian Unionist, another religious paper, existed a short while. be an important State organ between 1857 and 1859. Other papers, many of them re- ligious, were The Southern Magazine of Temperance, Young’s Spirit of the South and Central American, The Nashville Monthly Record ofHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 635 Medical and Physical Sciences, Southern Homestead, whose literary de- partment was edited by Mrs. L. Virginia French, and The Baptist Stand- ard came out between 1858 and 1860. The Temperance Monthly, edited by Mrs. Emelie C. 8. Chilton, a poet of high order, and The Daily Hven- ing Bulletin were papers of 1859. The Opposition was a campaign paper in the struggle for governor between Col. John Netherland and, Gov. Isham G. Harris. The National Pathfinder was edited by T. F. Hughes, Hsq., in 1860. The Nashville Christian Advocate began in 1834. It was edited successively by many prominent divines. The Louisville (Ky.) Christian Advocate was merged in this paper in 1851. Tn 1858 Rey. Dr. McFerrin, who had been editor, resigned, and was suc- ceeded by Rev. H. N. McTyeire. Dr. McFerrin was appointed agent of the Methodist Episcopal Publishing House at that time. The Nashville True Whig began in 1845, and was succeeded in 1856 by The Nashville Patriot. | The Nashville Gazette, the second paper of that name, was published in 1819 by Mr. George Wilson, the same who had conducted Wilson’s Knoxville Gazette in 1804. The Nashville Whig, established by Moses and Joseph Norvell, began in 1812 and continued to 1816. The Nash- ville Banner, a weekly, existed between 1822 and 1826. It was then united with The Whig, under the name of Nashville Banner and Whig, a semi-weekly. It was not until 1831 that Nashville had a daily paper. This was The National Banner and Nashville Advertiser. This contin- ued until 1834, when it was found that daily papers did not pay in Nash- ville, and it became a tri-weekly. The Nashville Republican grew out of the materials of the old Clarion and Tennessee Gazette in 1824. After some changes it became a daily issue in 1837. The Republican Banner was begun in 1837, enlarged in 1839, and in 1842 Gen. F. K. Zollicoffer, who had learned the printer’s trade in Mr. F. S. Heiskell’s office at Knoxville, assumed the editorship. Gen. Zolli- coffer earned a reputation as an able political writer, and kept up The Banner to the highest standard of newspaper excellence. The Banner had many editors who were men of distinguished merit and position. The Nashville Gazette, third paper of that name, was in existence from 1844 to 1862. About this time The Republican Banner was established, and continued to 1853, when it was united with The American under the title of Nashville Union and American. In 1848 was established The Daily Centre-State American and Nashville Weekly American. The Nashwille Union and American began in 1853, and grew out of the con- solidation of The Union and The American. The Union had been ed- ited by Col. J. G. Harris, who was an editorial pupil of George D. Pren-ee aecamaraleepareet te on ee ee POS etna tee poesia ede piste eT ae a ead Oe aS ae et ap ceaeees ee nig, aT Eee te — - 2 : ae Slee ee : = ee ee suatvemaanthanaiioam Beinn. Si tS ne : = et RT eee LO 636 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. tice. Col. Harris had earned distinction as a political writer, and was an adherent of Gen. Andrew Jackson. Mr. John Miller McKee was com- mercial and city editor of The Union and American in 1858, and in 1860 Mr. John C. Burch became associate editor. Mr. Leon Trousdale was also one of the editors of this paper. The Nashville Union and American vas suspended on the evacuation of Nashville by the Confederates in 1862. Nashville, at the outbreak of the Rebellion, was considered the pub- center of the South, having more periodicals than any other city She had no less than nineteen journals and nine large pub- At the fall of Fort Donelson, in 1862, the general Printing offices were lishin of her size. oe oO lishing houses. panic induced every man to seek his own safety. abandoned by members of the press, their public position rendering them peculiarly obnoxious to the enemy. Many printers were without employment, and in the absence of better occupation engaged in what proved a lucrative business, that of selling newspapers. There were The first made its appearance in February, several war publications. This suspended after 1862. under the name of The Nashville Times. the issue of the thirteenth number. Six numbers of the Hvening Bulle- tin followed. The Nashville Daily Union began in 1862 and had a existence. Other papers were The Nashville Dispatch, April, 1862. The Constitution, with George Baber as editor, appeared in July, 1862, and The Nashville Daily Press began in May, 1863. It con- tinued, with frequent change of editors, to May, 1865, when it was united Mr. S. C. Mercer edited in 1864 The Nash- It was afterward merged with the Press, short with the Times and Union. ville Times and True Union. and bore the title of Nashville Daily Press and Times. The Nashville Daily Journal existed for a short time in 1863. ©. Houk was editor. After the war the publication of The Union and American, as a daily, tri-weekly and weekly, continued to the latter part of 1866, when it be- came, by consolidation with The Dispatch, The Union and Dispatch. In 1868 the paper was combined with The Daily Gazette, and resumed the In 1875 The Union and American was A. paper named Mr. L. name of Union and American. consolidated with The Republican Banner, and became The American, & daily, semi-weekly and weekly issue. The Tennessee Staats-Zeiiung is a German paper, and is said to be the only daily paper of that kind Mr. John Ruhm edited the paper in 1866, when it was first issued. He has since become a prominent lawyer in Nashville. The Methodist Episcopal Publishing House has quite a number of journalistic publications, and does a large book business. outside of New Orleans.PY ST an erg ae SS M i ; Ss SS ALS ri PURE CSA Oo LARUE Nita “ on ee Shr SRS n>: a CIS ieee: h FROM PHOTO BY TRUSS, NOELLEIN % GIERS. NASHVILLE ANDREW JOHNSON> arr IF OT a sin a alee oa ~ 4 repent eons ep en-snesoaies : oman ba eo he CELA tS ein, Sa: = ne ae ee tthesene . eat = 5 SERRE - rac raR > : . s . . * ‘ <= nee ei nematic a ep manna a — > *Y : ces SS et neh val i BY i Uh | > a> als r i ie ‘ PR ATTN TT PPE DEES, Mist rua — ar ~ ae ta Fe eae 33 Se, epee a ae ere = SASS 4s eee BE pe Tig AEE ITT ee eh ra nse tR s es —————— ee a ee 7 md LE I a EE A LAP 3 TORY OF TENNESSEE. B50 HISTORY OF TENNESSE! forgiven, for redeeming grace and un- praise for the evidence felt for sins dying love. The excitement was so intense that the ministers found their strength taxed to the utmost to supply the demands of the congre- gation. From thirty to forty professed to have been converted that day. oO : J ‘ Such was the beginning of the rel e bodily agitations attending upon, 1t was looked upon as the igious movement which on account of the strang most wondertul event of the times. The next meeting was held on the following Saturday and Sunday at the Beach Meeting-house, ten miles west of Gallatin, Sumner County, where was present a vast assembly and where were witnessed scenes sim- ‘lar to those above described.* On the Sunday following this meeting a most wonderful meeting was held at Muddy River Church, a few miles north of Russellville, Ky. To this meeting the people came in in all kinds of vehicles, on horseback and on foot, from all distances up to 100 miles. Long before the hour for preaching came there were present three times as many as the: house could seat, and still they came singly, and in companies of tens, fifties and hundreds. A temporary pulpit was erected in the woods, and seats for the multitude made by felling large trees and laying them on the ground. ‘‘ Preaching commenced, and soon the presence of the all-pervading power was felt throughout the vast as- sembly. As night came on it was apparent the crowd did not intend to disperse. * * * Some took wagons and hurried to bring in straw from barns and treading-yards. Some fell to sewing the wagon sheets together, and others to cutting forks and poles on which to spread them. Counterpanes, coverlets and sheets were also fastened together to make tents or camps. Others were dispatched to town and to the nearest houses to collect bacon, meal, flour, with cooking utensils to pre- pare food for the multitude. In afew hours it was a sight to see how much was gathered together for the encampment. Fires were made, eooking begun, and by dark candles were lighted and fixed to a hundred trees; and here was the first and perhaps the most beautiful camp-ground the world has ever seen.” t The Rev. Barton W. Stone, a Presbyterian clergyman, pastor of Cane Ridge and Concord congregations in Bourbon County, Ky., hearing of the religious excitement in the southern part of his own State and in Northern Tennessee, started early in the spring of 1801 to attend one of the camp- meetings in Logan County, Ky. Afterward he wrote a book describing what he had seen, and as no one has given a more minute description of *The meeting held at Red River Baptist Church is said to have been held in 1799, and this at the Beach Meeting-house in 1800. If this be correct the times of holding these two meetings are pretty accurately deter- mined. tSmith’s Legends of the War of the Revolution.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 6dL the bodily agitations, otherwise known as “the jerks” or “epidemic epilepsy,” the following extracts from his work are here introduced: “On arriving I found the multitude assembled on the edge of a prai- rie, where they continued encamped many successive days and nights, during all which time worship was being conducted in some parts of the encampment. The scene tome was passing strange. It baffles description. Many, very many, fell down as men slain in battle, and continued for hours together ina comparatively breathless and motionless state, sometimes, for a few moments, reviving and exhibiting symptoms of life by a deep groan or piercing shriek, or by a prayer for mercy most fervently uttered. After lying thus for hours they obtained deliverance. The gloomy cloud that had covered their faces seemed gradually and visibly to disappear, and hope in smiles to brighten into joy. They would then arise shout- ing deliverance, and address the surrounding multitude in language truly eloquent and impressive. With astonishment did I hear women and children declaring the wonderful works of God and the glorious mysteries of the gospel. Their appeals were solemn, heart-rending, bold and free. Under such addresses many others would fall down in the same state from which the speakers had just been delivered. “Two or three of my particular acquaintances from a distance were struck down. I sat patiently by one of them (whom I knew to be a eare- less sinner) for hours, and observed with critical attention everthing that passed from beginning to end. I noticed the momentary revivings as from death, the humble confession, the fervent prayer and ultimate deliy- erance; then the solemn thanks and praise to God, the affectionate exhortation to companions and to the people around to repent and come to Jesus. I was astonished at the knowledge of the gospel truth displayed in these exhortations. The effect was that several sank down into the appearance of death. After attending to many such cases my conviction was complete that it was a good work, nor has my mind wavered since on the subject. “The bodily agitations or exercises attending the excitement * * * were various and called by various names, as the falling exer- cise, the jerks, the dancing exercise, the barking exercise, the laughing and singing exercises, and soon. The falling exercise was very common among all classes, saints and sinners of every age and grade from the philosopher to the clown. The subject of this exercise would generally, with a piercing scream, fall like a log on the floor or earth and appear as dead. The jerks cannot be so easily described. Sometimes the subject of the jerks would be affected in one member of the body and sometimes in the whole system. When the head alone was affected it would jerka _ CO abeiga a Brey = 2 as : Pe on eae Oe =, a ing pS oop eal = “a rae eee naesare >"F eee woe = he =i eiilieapsaee TL ARNE Teh Ee : =: ieee k ON LS =a PR i ay amine ae a, A ee ae re qerenenanay pase = Ere tL IS ? : ie ~ Se Sa aN a SSeS Spee or —— penn ee sip canbeee oy ——, spears! apne a Sie rae . Ie ee Se AP A eam yn a japan Sap Bi . x SEE eee ene Sor esi itn Ta ity a A a EG TO a rl ons EIST Sa A Tian ee MINN i t mi yee " , rt pi a ; f el ' Peal Lele | i \ 4 t ' ‘ fe i ii i it 4) Vr tr i at aa 4 1 reais! rhe a] ft: i { ti ‘ i j Foo es “eres; 652 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. = ns ‘4 of = : . Rak thio font ay b: ac skward and torwarad, Or trom side tO side SO quickly that the teatures Cc 5 : “ 1 T \}" ré ‘ « Ta ac] i € ror cou ld not he distinguishe d. when the whole person was attected. L hav seen @ person stand in one place and jerk vackward and forwad in quick succession, the head nearly touching the Fie behind and b>fore. ALI classes. saints as well as sinners, thus affected. They eould not account for it, but some have told me the strong as well as the weak, were these were among the happiest mome ants of their lives. “The dancing exere ise generally began with the jerks and was pecu- liar to professors of religion. The subject atter jerking awhile 3gan to dance and then the jerks woul 1 cease. Such dancing was indee * heav- enly to the spectators. There was nothing in it like levity, nor calcu- lated to excite levity in the beholder. The smile of heaven shone on the countenance of the subject and assimilate .d to angels appeared the whole person. The barking exercise, aS opposers conte mptuously ealled it, was nothing but the jerks. A person afflicted with the jerks, especially in the head. would often make a grunt or bark from the suddenness of the jerk. This name of barking seems to have had its origin from an old Presby- terian preacher of East Tennessee. He had gone into the woods for pri- vate devotion and was seized with the jerks ‘Standing near a sapling he caught hold of it to prevent his falling, a as his head jerked back he gave a grunt, or a kind of noise similar to a bark, his face turned upward. ee wag discovered him in this position and reported that he had found the old preacher barking up a tree. ‘The laughing exercise was Irequent, confined solely to the religious. It was a loud, hearty laughter but it excited laughter in none that saw it The subject appeared rapturously solemn, and his laughter excited so- lemnity in saints and sinners. It was truly indescribable. The running exercise was nothing more than that persons feeling something of thes bodily agitations, through fear, attempted to run away and thus escape from them; but it commonly happened that they ran not far before they fell, where they became so agitated that they could not proceed any fur- ther. The singing exercise is more unaccountable than anything else I ever saw. ‘The subject, in a very happy state of mind, would sing most melodiously, not from the mouth or nose, but entirely in the breast, the sound issuing thence. Such noise silenced everything and attracted the attention of all. It was most heavenly; none could ever be tired of hearing it.” Elder Stone has been described as a man of respectable bearing, of spotless character and childlike simplicity, and easily attracted to the strange and marvelous. The above extract would seem amply to justily the description, and also that his jadgment was somewhat under the do-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. H53 minion of his imagination. Like Elder Hodge he evidently believed that the “jerks” were the work of God. He said that Dr. J. P. Campbell and himself ‘‘eoneluded it to be something beyond anything we had ever known in nature.” Other writers besides Elder Stone have given descriptions of the jerks. The celebrated Peter Cartwright says: “Just in the midst of our controversies on the subject of the powerful exercises among the people under preaching, a new exercise broke out among us, called the jerks, which was overwhelming in its effects upon the people. No matter whether they were saints or sinners they would be taken under a warm song or sermon and seized with a convulsive jerk- ing all over, which they could not by any possibility avoid; the more they resisted the more they jerked. If they would not strive against it and would pray in good earnest the jerking would usually abate. I have seen more than 500 persons jerking at one time in my large congrega- tions. Most usually persons taken with the jerks, to obtain relief. as they said, would rise up and dance. Some would run but could not eet away. Some would resist: on such the jerks were very severe. To see these proud young gentlemén and young ladies dressed in silks. jewelry and prunella, from top to toe, take the jerks, would often excite my risj- bilities. The first jerk or so you would see their fine bonnets. caps and combs fly, and so sudden would be the jerking of the head that their long, loose hair would crack almost as loud as a wagoner’s whip.” Besides other amusing experiences with the jerks, Peter Cartwright relates an account of a very different nature of a man who was jerked to death, which is probably the only case on record. A company of drunk- en rowdies attended a ~amp-meeting on what was called the Ridge. The jerks were very prevalent. The leader of the rowdies was a very large, drinking man, who cursed the jerks and all religion. Shortly afterward he himself took the jerks and started to run, but jerked so powerfully that he could not get away. Halting among some saplings he took a bottle of whisky out of his pocket and swore he would drink the ——— jerks to death, but he jerked so violently he could not get the bottle to his mouth. At length, on account of a sudden jerk, his bottle struck a sapling, was broken and his whisky spilled upon the ground. nee - ~ = eat _ = See eke een at ao bes < mn ie cs a (peeks antag. eee Kut gin Popa S = ices ayenag Ying ————— Ah RT EET } ee — : : a a Se a eae EEN, LET LS ETE RT 654 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. has also left his account of the jerks. He preached in Knoxville, Tenn., in 1805, when about 150 of his congregation were affected with the jerks. ‘T have seen all denominations of religion exereised with He says: ak jerks, gentleman and lady, black and white, young and old without exception. I have passed a meeting-house where L observed the under- h had been cut for camp-meeting, ose for the people to hold on by. IL orowt and from fifty to a hundred sap- lings were left. breast high, on pur} observed where they held on they had kicked up the earth as a horse stamping fies. L believe it does not effect those naturalists who try to e > a eet it to philosophize 1] ee a the lukewarm, lazy professor opinion was that the jerking was eounted for on any known principle. It has been stated above that the first manifestations of this strange were witnessed at the old Red River Baptist Church. Some ‘on. and rarely those who are the most pious, but and the wicked are subject to it.” His “entirely involuntary and not to be ac- phenomenon authorities, however, say that they first appeared at a sacramental meeting in East Tennessee, where several hundreds of both sexes were seized with The numbers that were affected at different sac- ramental and camp-meetings were various. At Cabin Creek, May, 1801, ll that on the third night, to prevent their being trampled this strange affection. 50 many fe upon, they were collected together and laid outin order, in two squares of the meeting-house, covering the floor At Paint Creek, 200 fell, at Pleasant Point. 300. and at Cane Ridge, in August, like so many corpses. 1801. as many as 3,000 are computed to have fallen. This great revival lasted through the years 1800, 1801, 1802 and 1803. and resulted in the conversion of probably no very accurate estimate of the number was ever made. x . « ‘ many thousands of people, though Per- haps its most prominent peculiarity was that it was a Spontaneous out- burst of religious emotion among the masses. There was no great revival like Wesley or Whitefield; there were no protracted meetings, preacher lone-continued and united effort. a revival was grad- oO oO at which by a ually brought about; vival, which im an unusual manner came upon both preacher and people. Another characteristic of the revival was this: doctrinal and dogmatical Their value seems to have been for the but the camp-meetings were the result of the re- discussions were dispensed with. time being entirely overlooked. The efforts for the ministers were chiefly, if not wholly devoted to the excitation of the emotions, to impressing upon the minds of the multitudes the great religious truth of the impos- sibility of escape from punishment for sin, except through repentance and the acceptance of Christ as the Savior of the world; hence, the peo- > ple labored under a powerful conviction of the necessity of reformation) HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 655 in their daily lives, which is always of infinitely greater importance than the doctrine of the decrees. The doctrines that were uttered were mainly those of Arminians and Pelagins rather than those of Calvin: doctrines which appeal more directly to the heart and the common intellect than those that were temporarily neglected. When the great excitement had died away, however, the discussion of doctrines was again renewed, to some of the features of which especially, such as were results of the re- vival itself, we shall refer after giving an explanation of the probable cause or causes of the jerks. These bodily agitations, which within the State of Tennessee were, strange as it may at first appear, confined almost exclusively to the Methodists and Presbyterians. although they were ex- perienced to some extent by the Baptists. But to the Presbyterians be- long the credit of first putting a check to and largely diminishing this wild extravagance. A minister of this denomination ata great camp- meeting at Paris, Ky., in 1803, arose, and in the strongest language denounced what he saw as extravagant and even monstrous. and imme- diately afterward, a part of the people under his leadership, took decided ground against the jerks. From that moment the wonderful movement began sensibly to decline. Many good people of those times together with the leading divines, as has been seen above, unaccustomed as they were then to referring effects to natural causes, and supposing the church, as compared with the rest of the world, to be under the special care of Divine Providence, considered these bodily agitations to be manifestations of Divine power, looked upon them as miracles attesting the truth of religion as those on the day of Pentecost. Others believed them to be the result of the machinations of Satan, and designed by him to discredit religion gener- ally, and camp-meetings and revivals in particular, which he feared would convert the world and destroy his power. But it does not necessarily follow that because good Christian people believed them to be the effect of Divine power that they really were so, Although generally supposed then to be so, they were not by any means new or peculiar to those times. Such agitations were common and remarkably violent in the days of Whitefield and the Wesleys. They bear a close resemblance to what was known as the jumping exercise in Wales, described by Dr. ‘Haygarth in his treatise on ‘‘ The Effect of the Imagination in the Cure of Bodily Diseases.’ Besides these instances of these exercises there were in France 200 years ago, more wonderful manifestations than any recorded as having been witnessed in Tennessee. - ee a, 1 made their appearance, and by a sanctimonious show of piety and zeal i fi ! M ve 4 4 a fo eee weeLS SS ———e eta eee ae : i Reo _ ry os a ere ep noses TEs oem. Scaenaiinaed Ser . ae ar Seg a pee Ga Ee, — or ee » = aon ere sane ‘ a eS Sa a a ele LL TS TIM. SS ; int | be ne i F } ae) ; | . , : ‘| s i } ie ea i ae ‘ | | iy Bel yee at , HI i ' ia ! i | { j | ; iy | Tbe ear ae ‘ i ee. AMEE RRNA | 1 | i: ; ‘Te 7 st 1 ey i tt aie j | ‘ ie at ij Rika ad 5 $ of i lj 28) tee pal Byte ao heat | :| Sat Saat A wee briana | AU eR a ges ; i a DE ii ‘ i 7D : : ai RY ; y i Bile art ae : i : vel | ait ; Wied Hace tebaa j i +f j We 1 nad | f Te eeanH | PAN ui 1} He tae HI hea, Pe ah Hehe | eal } | th ih} koe! ‘eames! at j ; i ot oni } i in }. a i { | ! fae eUee BRL Ber cGy wee iit 1 erty ee hg 1 | eae tia | ty 44) : \ J ap i ! Bia | eel 1] Mote | Vee i ‘pet | Bul eh lt A ol rae ee ae ; 8 f oe H |i { : Aldo Naih { leg f RE Ail 4 | ne ny Hi i | i ; if ' ia J ; ; . ie f i ‘ i 1 | VR Hee 1 i g ! } ' ant | 1 1h : | ipl j ane 4 i it vin bent : 4 ; } wi ae a ol ei 1 ; 1 j Baa ee | Ne} t aay | il Waa) we ah E he } | ; A y t ir 1a rit 2 Rae bab dy bd | : ‘| i ei ‘ Hil Ny 5 q : wityi| 6 pant i We Hi i iy rh | | ait ; 2 Bia { able ip it i | . SMe LS ii ae ‘ fies id ey ed ee a) if] | ‘ I : i a i i te A ’ feag , ih 1 i } } ta bo fait Pes t Hill it § ty hi t a fa "ee Hy | f } : 658 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. luable Presbyterian preachers and a number of un- drew off several va rational doubtless to the great Injury of the cause of wary members, Christianity.” * About the same time other sects sprang up, yy “Stoneites,” ‘Marshallites,” ‘“Schismat- the Synod of Kentucky lost eight mem- known by the respect - ive names of “New Lights” « ics.” ete. By these “heresies” bers: B. W. Stone, John Dunlavy, Richard McNamar, Robert Marshall, John Thomson, Huston, Rankin and David Purviance. Marshall and Thomson after a time returned to the Presbyterian faith. The “Stone- ites” or “New Lights” were a body formed mainly through the efforts of Elder Stone. after he had decided to abandon Presbyterianism altogether. This new body was called by its adherents the “Christian Church,” while by outsiders it was called by the name of New Lights. They held many of the views which afterward characterized the Campbell reforma- ont especially the famous dogma of “baptism for the remission of sins,” and Elder Stone intimates in his book pretty plainly that in adopting it the “Disciples of Christ” or ““Campbellites,” as the followers of Alexan- der Campbell were originally called, had stolen his thunder. When the Campbell reformation reached Kentucky Elders Stone and Purviance united with the reformers, and thus the Southern branch of the old “Christian Church” finally disappeared. Since then the name of Dis- ciples, or Campbellites, has been exchaged for the old name of the “Christian Church.” Elders Dunlavy, McNamar, Huston and Rankin joined the Shakers. Another but more remote result of the great revival was the expulsion from the Presbyterian Church of a portion of the membership by whom was formed the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. The necessities of the Presbyterians at that time in Kentucky and Tennessee were peculiar. In 1801 a few Presbyterian clergymen formed an association which was named the Transylvania Presbytery. On account of the great numbers added to the ranks of Christians by the revival there was not a suffici- ency of educated ministers to supply the demand. This presbytery felt justified in ordaining to the ministry some young men who had not re- ceived a classical education. In 1802 the Transylvania Presbytery was livided into two sections, one of which was named the Cumberland Presbytery, and which included the Green River and Cumberland Coun- ties. In 1804 aremonstrance signed by Revs. Thomas B. Craighead, John Bowman and Samuel Donnel was sent to the Synod of Kentucky against the proceedings of the Cumberland Presbytery in several par- ticulars, amongst other things in licensing uneducated ministers. Being «Recollections of the West,” by Rev. Lewis Garrett.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 659 taken completely by surprise, and thinking the citation of at least doubt- ful legality, the Cumberland Presbytery refused to appear before the synod when cited. At the meeting of the synod in October, 1805. a commission consisting of ten ministers and six elders was appointed to investigate the entire subject, vesting this commission with full synod- ical powers to confer with the members of the presbytery and to adjudi- cate upon their Presbyterial proceedings. Notwithstanding that the Cumberland Presbytery considered this commission vested with uncon- stitutional powers, they all, except two ministers and one elder. appeared before it at the appointed time and place. There were present ten or- dained ministers, four licentiates and four candidates. The commission after censuring the Presbytery for having received Rey. Mr. Haw into connection, and considering irregular licensures and ordinations, detér- mined to institute an examination into the qualifications of the young men to preach. ‘This examination the young men resisted on the ground that the Cumberland Presbytery was competent to judge of the faith and abilities of 1ts candidates. The result of this refusal was that the com- mission adopted a resolution prohibiting all the young men in connection with that Presbytery, ordained, licensed and candidates, from preaching, exhorting or administering the ordinances until they should submit to the requisite examination. The revival preachers, however, resolved to continue preaching and administering the ordinances, and encouraged the young men to continue the exercise of their respective functions. They also formed a council, consisting of the majority of the ministers and elders of the Cumberland Presbytery, of which most of the congre- gations in the Presbytery approved. In October, 1806, an attempt was made at reconciliation with the synod, but the synod confirmed the action of the commission with reference to the re-examination of the young men, and at the same time dissolved the Cumberland Presbytery, attach- ing its members not suspended to the Transylvania Presbytery. The revival ministers determined to continue their work in the form of a council, until their case could go before the General Assembly, which met in May, 1807. At this meeting of the Assembly their case was ably presented, but that body declined to judicially decide the case. The synod, however, upon the advice of the Assembly, revised its proceed- ings, but was unable to modify them. Finally in 1809 the General As- sembly decided to sustain the proceedings of the synod. Thus the Cum- berland Presbytery was effectually excluded from the Presbyterian Church. However, another attempt at reconciliation with the synod of Kentucky was made, their proposition being to adopt the Confession, of Faith except fatality only. To this proposition the synod could not accede.iS ee ee ae Te acti RTT ; a = — ene eae ee : = Cline Wee: Le — — os a. Fie sere ig er = See ERS iy SRT OL. AES = — Pi ms fons creme aes es SP a a 1 age a ee re os 660 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. It had been the custom of the Presbyterian Chureh in North Carolina to ordain men to the ministry W of Faith, with the exception of the idea of fatality taught therein, and the Transylvania Presbytery had also } to make the same exception if they chose. Most of the who had lent their aid in the promotion of the re- When. therefore, the acceptance in full of ho adopted the Westminster Confession ermitted ministers in their ordi- nation yvows Presbyterian ministers vival were men of this class. the Westminster Confession of | to vield without violating their convictions as honest and con- ‘aith was required of them, they found it impossible scientious men. Thus the doctrine of fatality became an impassable bar- rier between them and the Presbyterian Chureh. Neither could they, on account of differences of doctrine, conscientiously unite with any other Christian body. Besides, as they regarded the Presbyterian as the most Seriptural form of church government in the world, they determined to ; independent of the Presbyterian Church. Aeccord- form a Presbytery 1810. the Rey. Finis Ewing and Rev. Samuel ingly, on February 3, King, and licentiate Ephraim MeLean proceeded to the humble log resi- dence of the Rey. Samuel McAdoo, in Dickson County, Tenn., and submit- ted to him the proposed plan of forming a new and independent Presby- tery. Atter earnest prayer that evening until midnight, the next morn- ing he decided in favor of the proposal, and on that day, February 4, 1810. at his residence, was formed the first Presbytery of the Cumber- land Presbyterian Church. Before their adjournment Ephraim Mclean was ordained. “The next meeting of the new Cumberland Presbytery was held in March. 1810. At this session it included four ordained ministers ”’ (the four above named), ‘five licensed preachers: James B. Porter, Hugh Kirkpatrick, Robert Bell. James Farr and David Foster, and eight candi- dates: Thomas Calhoun, Robert Donnel, Alexander Chapman, William Harris. R. McCorkle, William Bumpass, David MeLinn and William Bar- net. After a few months they were joined by the Rev. William McGee. These men were the fathers of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. They adopted as their standard of theology the Westminster Confession of Faith, excepting the idea of fatality.”* This ‘“‘idea of fatality” was supplanted by the following particulars: First, that there are no eternal reprobates. Second. that Christ died not for a part only, but for all mankind. Third, that all infants dying in infancy are saved through Christ and the sanctification of the Spirit. Fourth, that the Spirit of God operates on the world, or as co-extensively as Christ has made the atonement. in such manner as to leave all men ine xecusable. With these ‘Origin and Doctrines ol the Cumberland Presbyterian Church ’—ChrismenHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 661 exceptions the Cumberland Presbyterians adopted the Westminster Con- fession of Faith, and thus was established in Tennessee a new Christian denomination, professing a system of doctrine midway between Calvin- ism and Arminianism, for further particulars respecting which the reader is referred to sectarian writings. After encountering and overcoming numerous obstacles, this church was in a few years established on a firm foundation. At the fourth meet- ing of its Presbytery, in October, 1811, a vain attempt was made to effect a reunion with the Presbyterian Church, but this church, though then and for many years afterward willing to unite with the mother church on ‘‘proper conditions,’ would, rather than recede from its position and preach the doctrines of her confession of faith, prefer to maintain a dis- tinet organization, and labor on according to the best light given them. Their success in this new theological field was from the first very great and very gratifying. In 1813 the original Presbytery was divided into three Presbyteries, and in October of that year the members of these three Presbyteries met at Beech Church, Sumner County, Tenn., and formed the Cumberland Synod. At the first meeting of this synod a committee was appointed to prepare a confession of faith, discipline and catechism in conformity with the expressed principles of the church. This committee, which consisted of the Revs. Finis Ewing, William McGee, Robert Donnell, and Thomas Calhoun, reported the result of their labors to the synod in 1814, by whom their confession of faith was adopted. The numbers of Cumberland Presbyterians continued. steadily and quite rapidly to increase. In 1820 they had numerous churches not only in ‘Tennessee, but also in Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas and Alabama. In 1822 they had forty-six ordained ministers, and in 1826, eighty. A general assembly was then deemed necessary by a por- tion of the clergy, and the plan of a college to be located at Princeton, Ky., was adopted. In 1827 the number of ordained ministers was 114. In 1828 the synod discussed the subject of forming a general assembly, and to carry the idea into effect, divided the synod into four—those ot Missouri, Green River, Franklin and Columbia. The first general as- sembly met at Princeton, Ky., in 1829. To illustrate the rapidity of the erowth of this church in membership it may be stated that in 1822 there were 2,718 conversions, and 575 adult baptisms; in 1826, 3,305 conversions and 768 adult baptisms; in 1827, 4,006 conversions and . 396. adult baptisms. In 1856 there were 1,200 ministers of this denom1- . nation, and 130,000 members, and since that time their growth has been proportionally rapid. The college established in 1525 at Princeton, Ky., - was named Columbia College.IE ee are gow sa Ore. nt oe pihcuntiat a - STF Fae ne RAI = LRT 662 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The statistics for the Cumberland Presbyterian Church for 1569 were as follows: General Assembly, 1; Synods, 24; Presbyteries, 99; minis- ters. 1,500; communicants, 130.000: universities, Cumberland at Leba- non, Tenn.. and Lincoln, at Lincoln, IL ; colleges in Tennessee, male, 2othel. at McLemoresville; female, Cumberland Female College, at MreManmna lle. and Donnell Female College at Winchester. Since this time the Cumberland Presbyterian Church has continued to grow and prosper in this, as in many other States, as the following statistics will show: In 1875 there were, as now, fifteen Presbyteries, with an aggre- gate church membership of 22,566, and 10,961 Sunday-school scholars. In 1880 the church membership was 29,186, and the number of Sunday- school scholars 11,031, and in 1885, the last year for which statistics are obtainable, there were, omitting the Presbytery of Nashville, for which there was no report, 32,726 communicants, 13,447 Sunday-school schol- ars, and $543,545 worth of church property. The total value of the church property belonging to this denomination in the United States was, in the same year, $2,319,006. As may be readily conjectured the Methodists reaped a bountiful har- vest from the great revival. It will be remembered that the Rev. Fran- cis Paythress was presiding elder on the Cumberland District. In 1804 Rey. Lewis Garrett was presiding elder in this district, which included Nashville and Red River in Tennessee, besides portions of Kentucky, Mississippi and Illinois. He traveled the entire Cumberland Valley, from the mouth of the river to the mountains, through the cane brakes of Caney Fork, through every part of the Green River country, visiting settlements and finding all classes much alive to the importance of re- ligion. The Cumberland District was then composed of six circuits and two missions, with about eight or nine traveling preachers. Mr. Garrett was the successor of John Page, who was the presiding elder on this cir- cuit when it was formed in 1802. He had much to do with the great re- vival, and had to assist him such men as Thomas Wilkerson, Jesse Walker, James Gwynn, James Young and Tobias Gibson. When the Western Conference was organized in 1800 it included Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, southwest Virginia and the Missisippi Ter- ritory, all of the western country then occupied by the Methodists. To give an idea of the growth of Methodism in that early day the number of members for 1796 and 1803 are presented. In the former year the whole number in America was as follows: whites 48,128, colored 12,170. This was twenty-two years after the introduction of Methodism into the country. In Tennessee there were 799 white Methodists and 77 colored. In 1802 the numbers were whites 2,767, colored, 180. In 1803 theHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 663 numbers had increased to 3,560 whites and 248 colored. These numbers are, however, not strictly limited to State lines. The conference for 1807 was held September 15, 1806, at Ebenezer, in East Tennessee. Bishop Asbury present and presiding. It was during the progress of the revival that Miles Harper was brought to trial for violating the terms of the union which had been en- tered into by the Methodists and Presbyterians regarding the rules to govern them in preaching. One article of the union was that contro- verted points were to be avoided, and another was that they were not to proselyte. Harper, who was on Roaring River Circuit, preached right on without reference to the complaints of his Presbyterian brethren. The complaints continuing McKendree appointed a committee and put Har- per on his trial. His complainants, howéver, failed to prove the charges, and he in his own defense satisfactorily showed that they were there selves guilty of the very charges they had brought against him, as they had been preaching the doctrine of the unconditional and final persever- ance of the saints, known to all to be a controverted point. The result was that Harper was acquitted, with which all were satisfied. However. when McKendree proposed to put some of the Presbyterians on trial for preaching as above they objected, and he pronounced the union a mere farcical thing. After this the union was of short duration. Conference for 1808 met at Liberty Hill, Tennessee, October 1, 1808, about twelve miles from Nashville in Williamson County, the site of an early camp-ground. At this Conference a regulation was made concern- ing slavery, which was that no member of society or preacher should buy or sell a slave unjustly, inhumanly, or covetously; the case on complaint to be examined, for a member, by the quarterly meeting, and for a preacher, by appeal to an annual conference, where the guilt was proved the offender to be expelled. At this time the Western Conference con- tained 17,931 white and 1,117 colored members, an increase of 3,051. In 1811 the increase in the Holston District was 1,279, and in the Cum- berland District 1,819. In May, 1812, the General Conference met in New York and separated the Western Conference into two conferences, the Tennessee and Ohio. At that time there were in this country, in the United States, Territories and Canada, 184,567 members and 688 travel- ing ministers. Peter Cartwright in his autobiography in making a com- parison showing the growth of the church, says: “Lord save the church from desiring to have pews, choirs, organs or instrumental music, and a congregational minister like other heathen churches around them.” The Tennessee Conference embraced the Holston, Nashville, Cumber- land, Wabash, Illinois and Mississippi Districts, the southern part’ ofego ee atten a STE ey a Fea Snipe as: ee 666 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. seemed to be more than human. It was further told me that on his Aeain bed there were shining lights around him, and they supposed that he heard unearthly musie. ” Ii was about this time, in the years 1811 and 1812, that the religous emotions and fears of the people were affected and awakened in a most remarkable manner by the earthquakes and other phenomena of those vears. Itis very seldom that earthquakes occur over a great extent of country remote from voleanoes, but these quakings were felt over an ex- tent of country 300 miles long and of considerable width. The surface of the earth not only trembled and shook violently, but broke open in fis- sures, from which mud and water were thrown to the height of trees. The comet of 1811 was of tremendous magnitude, and as such bodies were then considered harbingers of impending calamity, great consterna- tion was produced by its appearance. The aurora borealis was also that year exceedingly brillant and beautiful, and many thought that in its rapid movements. the march of armies and bloodshed were portended. 3esides all these things there was a prospect of war with the Indians and with Great Britain. All these impending calamities produced in many quarters a deep-seated and terrible feeling of fear among the people, who shook and trembled more than did the earth beneath their feet. The uninformed but pious mind has for centuries been able to discover at frequent but irregularly occurring intervals signs of the near approach of the consummation of all earthly things. Wars and rumors of wars, false prophets, and the ‘‘ judgments of the Almighty” are seldom absent from the world, which is for this reason continually coming to an end. And at such times as those we are now discussing, uninformed but wicked people, conscious of the iniquity of their lives and of the impurity of their motives, flee to the church, the only refuge for them in the world. In the presence of the terrible comet, and of the earthquakes and im- pending war, men’s hearts failed them, their knees smote together with fear, and they implored the ministers to preach and pray. ‘The experi- ence they were then undergoing was altogether new. ‘They collected to- gether in groups, terrorized and pitiful crowds. Similar scenes were witnessed in 1833, at the time of the occurrence of the great meteoric showers, or “ falling stars,’ which produced a most profound and widely spread sensation upon the multitude. Men who for years had been per- sonal enemies, thinking the judgment day had come, made haste to be reconciled with each other, not waiting even for the dawn of day. Many instances are related by writers, who were eye-witnesses, which, when the danger was over, were exceedingly amusing, ridiculous or absurd. Only =?) one instance of this kind ean be here introduced. a. 2 Fy SES a‘itself. The Tennessee Conference which met in 1812, “4 ‘ Feiss HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 667 Peter Cartwright was in Nashville when the first severe shock of earthquake was felt. He saw a negro woman start to the spring for water. When the earth began to tremble and the chimneys and seaf- folding around buildings being erected began to fall, she raised a shout saying: “The Lord is coming in the clouds of heaven! The day of judg- ment! The day of judgment!’ Hearing this her two young mistresses were dreadfully frightened and came running out of the house begging her to stop and pray for them. But she replied: “I can not stop to pray for you now. I told you how it would be. He is coming! He is com- ing! [ must go tomeethim. Farewell! Hallelujah! Glory Hallelujah!” and went on shouting and clapping her hands. Such is the weakness of poor, ignorant human nature. When judg- ment is impending and apparently immediate and unavoidable, men are fearfully and tremblingly anxious to confess their own sins and to obtain pardon; when judgment seems indefinitely remote they are chiefly con- cerned about the sins of others and in denouncing against them the judg- ments of the Lord. Erasmus well said: ‘Quam religiosus nos afflictio facit!”* When history, philosophy and the natural sciences, the natural antidotes for superstition, shall become sufficiently familiar to the masses such pitiable exhibitions of human weakness will disappear. The action of this conference at Liberty Hill, Tenn., in 1808, has al- ready, been referred to. Some of the presiding elders and circuit preach- ers were strongly anti-slavery in their sentiments, and consequently were rigidly anti-slavery in the administration of discipline. ‘This was the case with the Rev. James Axley and Enoch Moore. ‘They not only re- fused to license slave-holders to preach, but also denied them the privilege of exhorting or leading in prayer-meeting. ‘They even went so far as to ' denounce slave-holders as no better than thieves and robbers. ‘The course of the conference in that early day is illustrated by the following en- try: “Leven Edney, recommended from Nashville Circuit; his character ex- amined and approved, Lewmer Blackman being security that he will set his slave free as soon as practicable.” It was, however, seldom found ‘“practicable”’ to set free the slave. Notwithstanding the action taken by the Methodist Church in its adoption of rules for the government ot slaves and slave-holders. the number of slaves held continued to increase. Generally speaking it was found impracticable to tree the slaves, hence regulations adopted by the church, aimed at the institution, had but little effect otherwise than to create and foster a prejudice against the church dealt with this ques- *How religious affliction makes us!a Oe ea /; aan : ee ————— rs TSE TE ea he Ere ae Ame Sa sii pon Zaomains “ae , - . . = hie _- - ™ ow Pe = se Sia ape eR SaaS e URGE aE ERATE Se ECURENE Se eT eee ean somes Bee ao ten awe 2 re Tames so _~ z = - — Sse a Ce a Ie om oar + 7 o tac “ a ye Rear, Site, waar nee C 23 a - ow Peace cbienicm alg aa Rpg Dag th : ae ps as oes — wna s 3 = ee os i = : — = en daoane en . - _ es mz comet 7 eee a —s Serene: it a RTS Te i SN a Po eee vam EG peripaaaeenns 7 Susie ‘ Perm. poten cai ae ee eee oa aaa my ee eee pete ss itis tiga esa ein VEIT a Pea he : i > - ot — i se : = pone “so aa oe ‘i = - es ye = ‘erst eres pate ee crpirie Dani Ste ie eae sea age a ie acai aga ae 2 malapraeneee feo = wen inn Snr cabrio oe re ao Ga cae we a at “se = . : : - re ' “e marty ee saeleerersh iain einer oa : - ~ —— a ar ESE EEE — Saree See a : : ———— x = Seo eee 7 — eed <2 ann inate eechiemenaaemandaantote maaan = . » - eS = ye - és : ‘x i See me rine ms ps snares np Seiden — = a Leen “ere el ae 668 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. tion with such wisdom as they possessed. It was provided that every preacher having charge of a circuit should, ig a slave to appear at the next ensuing” upon information received, cite any member buying or selliz quarterly eonference, which should proceed to determine whether such slave had been bought in a case of justice and mercy, and if this were found not to have been the case, the person buying or selling such slave should be expelled from the church. At the conference of 1815 this rule was voted to be unconstitutional and a report was adopted the substance of which was that the conferenee sincerely believed that slavery was a great moral evil, but as the laws of the country did not admit of emancipation without the special act of the Legislature in some places, freedom, they could not adopt any rule compelling church members to liberate their slaves, nor eould they devise any rule sufficiently specific to meet the various and complex eases that were continually arising. But as they could consistently with the laws and the nature of nor permit a slave so liberated to enjoy his to go as far things, to do away with the evil and “remove the curse from the Church of God,” they adopted two rules on the subject, the first being that 1f any member should buy or sell any slave or slaves to make gain, or should sell any slave to any slave-dealer, such member should be expelled from the church, except he could satisfactorily show that it was done to keep or place different members of the same family together; and the second was that no person should be eligible to the office of deacon in the church who did not disapprove of slavery and express a willingness to effect a legal emancipation of his slaves as soon as 1t was practicable for him to do so, At the conference held at Franklin, November 8, 1817, this question was again taken up for discussion with the result of the adoption of a very elaborate report. After a ‘“Whereas” that the General Conference had authorized each annual conference to formulate its own rules respecting slavery, the following resolutions (in substance ) were adopted: First—That if any local elder, deacon or preacher in the Methodist Episcopal Church should purchase a slave, the Quarterly Conference should say how long the slave should serve as a remuneration for the purchase money, and that the purchaser should enter into a written obli- gation to emancipate such slave at the expiration of the term of servitude, provided that emancipation were permissible under the laws of the State ; but that if the laws of the State should continue to oppose emancipation, then the next Quarterly Conference held atfer the expiration of the term of servitude, should determine the future status of the slave. Second—The same rule applied to private members of the church, but instead of the Quarterly Conference their cases were managed by anN Wadia As i mo) “ Nie AD mee 4Se “ nee et ee TT a eae ae ee eee a —— Siege S ah Egil apne erie ——- a tina ESD ocala at Se ee a = < ee a ——— —_ le LLHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. $69 committee appointed by the preacher having charge of their respective circuits; and in all cases relating to preachers, deacons, elders or private members, the children of slaves purchased, born during the time of bondage or term of servitude, were to be manumitted upon arriving at the age of twenty-five, provided the law should then admit of emancipation; but if the law should not then admit of emancipation, the cases of all ehildren born of purchased slaves were to be submitted to the Quarterly Conference or the committee, according to whether the owner was a preacher or private member. The portion of this rule which appled to the selling of slaves by a preacher or member is exceedingly interesting and curious. This provision required the preacher to submit his case to the Quarterly Conference and the private member to the committee, which Quarterly Conference or committee, as the case might be, should determine for what term of years the slave should be sold, and required the seller of the slave to record in the county court the emancipation of the slave at the expiration of the said term. This rule was to be en- forced from and after January 1, 1518. Such was the legislation of a body of ministers with reference to a subject over which they had no control, provided the laws themselves did not admit of emancipation, which they themselves assumed to be the fact. Hence the adoption of a. proviso which in every case, taking things as they were, either nullified the rule or made it easy for a member or a minister to retain his slave; for whenever he determined to own slaves it was easy to make it appear that it was in accordance with justice and mercy to retain those already in possession, or that under the law it was impracticable to set them free. Such legislation would seem to be suffi- ciently absurd, but it is amazing that an intelligent body of men should gravely attempt to compel a preacher or member to emancipate a slave at the exp‘ration of a term of years after having surrendered ownership and control of the same. The only theory conceivable which ean relieve the conference of the accomplishment of a solemn mockery is the supposition that they, having confidence in the justice of the future, must have be- lieved themselves to be anticipating civil legislation—that the legal emancipation of the slave was an event the immediate future must pro- duce. However, the attitude of the conference on this subject is of great historic value, bringing out into clear relief, as it does, the strong con- viction of the Methodist body of Christians that slavery was a creat moral evil, the existence of which was deplorable, and to be opposed by every means attached to which there was any hope of its gradual abolish- ment. At the conference held at Nashville October 1, 1819, two persons, Peter Burum and Gilbert D. Taylor, were recommended as proper to be AG Te ~ EL— ot a em = ' q \usts : ie t G p ie PaLE | Si ee vat Hak peta 118) HE Pe HUT, Ke Hl ‘a Hah i 1 bi , nat ee aya he eds Reale it Pd Sie iL ql a pata t| ha ie te } ac) } ii a. pai. Uae ES a re et by Ra \j : iad ia ala ua sh a4 Seep eth oes en ta ahaa ; iil 1 a fat PE 4 OG | i ere | ee dt | ay hid ui ‘ tas hag ts 1h ied BEL Fe tht \ Hl OEE AN) ara teeat | 4 as tee ei Willa: a i ia 4)! Nate 1 eas i if Tees at emia hata) | au) if } 4 ¥ 1 iw ia th DAHL at, tel Ae Yt] i mel) gh it Beret) Wie F aaah iL q 14 1 ¥ . SaMn a) ad ly hie aust yi | Aas * i | 570 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. admitted on trial, but both were rejected because they were slave-holders, and a number of applicants for deacon’s orders were similarly rejected. These rejections elicited the following protest: “Be it remembered that whereas Tennessee Annual Conference, held “1 Nashville October 1, 1819, have taken a course in their decisions rel- ative to the admission of preachers on trial in the traveling connection, and in the election of local preachers to ordination which goes to fix the principle that no man, even in those States where the law does not admit of emancipation, shall be admitted on trial or ordained to the office of deacon or elder if it is understood that he is the owner of a slave or slaves. That this course is taken is not to be denied, and it is avowedly designed to fix the principle already mentioned. Several cases might be mentioned, but it is deemed unnecessary to instance any except the case of Dr. Gilbert D. Taylor, proposed. for admission, and Dudley Hargrove, recommended for ordination. We deprecate the course taken as oppres- sively severe in itself and ruinous in its consequences, and we disapprove of the principle as contrary to and in violation of the order and discipline of our church. We, therefore, do most solemnly, and in the fear of God, as members of this conference, enter our protest against the proceedings of the eonference as it relates to the above-mentioned course and prin- ciple. Thomas L. Douglass, Thomas D. Porter, William McMahon, Benjamin Malone, Lewis Garrett, Barnabas McHenry, William Allgood, William Stribling, Ebenezer Hearn, Timothy Carpenter, Thomas String- field, Benjamin Edge, Joshua Boucher, William Hartt, John Johnson, Henry B. Bascom.” This protest had considerable influence upon the church in the South. It was taken to the General Conference and by that body referred to the eommittee on slavery, but nothing definite was accomplished. At the conference which met at Columbia in 1824 this question of slavery came up again in the form of an address from the ‘“‘Moral Relig- ious Manumission Society of West Tennessee,” whereupon the follow- ing resolution was adopted: Resolved, That the address from the Moral Religious Manumission Society be returned to committee accompanied with a note stating that so far as the address involves the sub- ject of slavery we concur in the sentiments that slavery is an evil to be deplored, and that it should be counteracted by every judicious and religious exertion. Thus it will be seen that the Methodist preachers admitted that slav- ery was a deplorable evil, and should be counteracted by every judicious and religious exertion. ‘‘What a misfortune,” says Rev. J. B. McFerrin,* “that this sentiment had not always obtained! treating the matter in a religious manner, and not intermeddling with it as a civil question.” *“Wfistory of Methodism in Tennessee,” to which this chapter is indebtedHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. O71 In 1832 mission work among the slaves was for the first time ear- nestly undertaken. South Carolina had set the example in work of this nature, and it was not long before there were scores of missionaries in the Southern States proclaiming the doctrines of Methodism to the bond- man as well as to the free. Among the blacks there were many genuine Christians and some excellent preachers. The decided and memorable impulse given to missionary work among the slaves was the result of a speech by Rey. (subsequently Bishop) James’O. Andrew, which “ car- ried by storm the whole assembly.” So successful was the work of mis- sions among the blacks that in 1846 the board reported 29,430 colored members, besides the communicants in the regular circuits and stations of the church, while the general minutes give the total number of col- ored members in the same years as 124,961. In 1861 the board reported 69,794 probationers, and 12,418 children under religious instruction, the general minutes, in 1860, showing 171,857 members and 35,909 proba- tioners. Without pursuing further in detail the action of the church on the important subject of slavery, it is now deemed proper to present a syn- opsis of the reasons for the separation of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States into two portions—the Methodist Episcopal Church, and the Methodist Episcopal Church South. While there may be differences of opinion with regard to minor points of controversy, it can be positively stated that had there been no slavery there would have been no epoch of separation. The existence of this institution, the nec- essary connection with it of church members and its perpetual agitation in the quarterly, annual and general conferences, because of the perpet- ual and increasing agitation of the question outside of the conferences, was finally the occasion of the disruption of the Methodist Episcopal Church, which has been and probably ever will be a potent cause of re- egret to thousands of Methodists in both sections of the country, and probably to all except those who can clearly discern the hand of Provi- dence in all events, and who are settled in their convictions that ‘“ He doeth all things well.” The General Conference met in New York May 1, 1844. It was the most memorable eonference of the Methodist Episcopal Church ever held in the United States. The first question of importance which occupied its attention was that of Francis A. Harding, who had been suspended by the Baltimore Conference from the ministerial office for refusing to man- umit five slaves belonging to his wife at the time of his marriage to her, and which, according to the laws of Maryland, still remained hers after the marriage. The action of the Baltimore Conference in suspending672 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Mr. Harding is sufficiently set forth in the following preamble and reso- lution: WHEREAS, The Baltimore Conference can not and will not tolerate slavery in any of % x oe * x ¥ its members. * % Resolved, That Brother Harding be suspended until the next Annual Conference or until he assures the Episcopacy that he has taken the necessary steps to secure the free- dom of his slaves. With this demand Brother Harding failed to comply because, accord- ing to his plea, of his inability under the laws of the State to do so; but. he nevertheless expressed a willingness to emancipate them and permit them to go to Africa or to any free State provided they were willing to accept freedom on those terms, but no evidence tends to show that any attempt was made to obtain their consent, or that their consent was obtained, and thus their emancipation was impracticable, for they could not live free in Maryland without violating the laws. But notwithstand- ing the impracticability of emancipation the action of the Baltimore Con- ference in the case of Mr. Harding was, on appeal to the General Confer- ence, after able arguments for the appellant by Dr. W. A. Smith, of Vir- ginia, and for the Baltimore Conference by John A. Collins, of Baltimore, sustained by the General Conference by a refusal to reverse it, the vote being 117 against reversal to 56 in favor of it, taken on the 11th of May. Another and still more important case came before the conference on May 22, in that of Bishop James O. Andrew, of Georgia, who had, against his own will, become connected with slavery. Several years previous to the meeting of this General Conference an old lady had bequeathed to him a mulatto girl in trust to be taken care of until she should arrive at the age of nineteen, when, if her consent could be obtained, she should be set free and sent to Liberia; but in case she should refuse to go to Liberia he should keep her and make her as free as the laws of Georgia would permit. When the time came she refused to go to Liberia, and as emancipation and continued residence in Georgia afterward was imprac- ticable, Bishop Andrew remained her owner. About five years previous to the meeting of this conference, Bishop Andrew’s wite’s mother left to her a negro boy, and Mrs. Andrews dying, without a will, the boy became the property of the Bishop. Besides all this, Bishop Andrew, in January, 1844, was married to his second wife, who had inherited from her former husband’s estate some slaves. After this marriage Bishop Andrew, unwilling to retain even part ownership in these inherited slaves, secured them to his wife by a deed of trust. But with reference to the first two slaves mentioned the Bishop became a slave-holder by the action of other people. The General Conference, impelled to action by the growing and assertive anti-slavery sentiment throughout the North-ow AN etic bre HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 673 ern States and the Northern Conferences, took action upon Bishop Andrew’s case by passing the famous Finley Resolution, which was as follows: WHEREAS, The Discipline of our Church forbids the doing of anything calculated to destroy our itinerant General Superintendency; and whereas Bishop Andrew has become connected with slavery, by marriage and otherwise, and this act having drawn after it circumstances which, in the estimation of this General Conference, will greatly embarrass the exercise of his office as an itinerant General Superintendent, if not, in some places, entirely prevent it; therefore Resolved, That it is the sense of this General Conference that he desist from the exer- cise of his office so long as this impediment remains. To clearly perceive the grounds for the passing of this resolution it is necessary to have reference to the discipline then governing the Methodist Episcopal Church. Of this discipline there were but two rules having either direct or indirect bearing upon the case, the first being as follows: ‘The bishop is amenable to the General Conference, who have power to expel him for improper conduct if they see it necessary; and the second being what has been called the Compromise Law of 1816 on the subject of slavery: ‘“We declare that we are as much as ever convinced of the oreat evil of slavery, therefore no slave-holder shall be eligible to any official station in our church hereafter where the laws of the State in which he lives will admit of emancipation and permit the liberated slave to enjoy freedom. When any traveling preacher becomes an owner of a slave or slaves by any means, he shall forfeit his ministerial character in our church, unless he execute, if it be practicable, a legal emancipation of such slaves conformably to the laws of the State in which he lives.” The above is all that is contained in the discipline concerning bish- ops and slavery. It would seem clear enough that the Bishop had vio- lated no rule of discipline if it were true that under the laws of Georgia emancipated slaves could not enjoy their freedom. And as no attempt was made by any one on behalf of the conference to prove that emancl- pated slaves could enjoy their freedom in Georgia, it must be assumed even if it were not the fact that under the laws of his State it was i1m- practicable for Bishop Andrew to emancipate his slaves. The probabil- ity is that the true attitude for the present to sustain toward the conter- ence of 1844 is one of sympathy rather than of censure, even by those who still regret the division in the church. It felt impelled and even compelled to take action upon this question that should satisfy at least a portion of the conferences, and chose to satisfy the majority—the anti- slavery portion, those opposed to the election of or the continuance in office or in orders of a slave-holding bishop. The venerable Dr. Olin, of the New York Conference, probably expressed the sense of the conter- ence as accuratelv as it can be expressed at the present day when heipso ic: Soaaen pomieeiee ease Sere TS: - Leen) ER) ape part = te apatite: Said a Oe Pee Rg RESET. — ee iamaneiinaat a 674 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. said: “I look at this proposition* not as a punishment of any grade ort x * * I believe that what is proposed by this substitute to be a constitutional measure, dishonorable to none, unjust to: none. As such I should wish it to go forth with the solemn declaration of this General Conference that we do not design it as a punishment or a censure; that it is in our apprehension only a prudential and expedient measure, calculated to avert the great evils that threaten us.” Looking at the question now from our present vantage ground it is evident that Dr. Olin could clearly discern the signs of the times. Division and separation, emanating from some source, it was impossible to avoid. The grand wave of anti-slavery sentiment had obtained im- pulse, and was irresistibly increasing in both volume and momentum. The General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, no less than the discipline, was, like every other obstacle this grand wave encountered, unable long to resist. The conference therefore, having to choose be- tween the discipline and the unity of the great body of the church, chose to sacrifice the discipline. Dr. Olin in another part of the same yeech from which the above extract is taken, with reference to the prob- ae oe. consequences of the passage of the Finley Resolution, said: “Yet allowing our worst fears all to be realized, the South will have this ad- vantage over us. The Southern Conferences are likely in any event to harmonize among themselves—they will form a compact body. In our Northern Conferences this will be impossible in the present state of things. They cannot bring their whole people to act together on one common ground; stations and circuits will be so weakened and broken as in many instances to be unable to sustain their ministry. I speak on this point in accordance with the convictions of my own judgment, after hay- ing traveled 3,000 miles through the New England and New York Confer- ences, that if some action is not had on this subject calculated to hold out hope—to impart a measure of satisfaction to the people—there will be distractions and divisions ruinous to souls and fatal to the permanent interests of the church. * * * But, sir, I will yet trust that we may put far off this evil day. If we can pass such a measure as will shield our principles from infringement, if we can send forth such a measure as will neither injure nor justly offend the South, and as shall neither censure nor dishonor - 3ishop Andrew, and yet shall meet the press- ing wants of the church, and, above all, if Almighty God shall be pleased to help by pouring out His Spirit upon us, we may yet avoid the rock upon which we now seem too likely to split.” A brief extract from a an unfulfilled prophecy by the Rey. George F. *The Finley Resolution.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 679d Pierce, of Georgia, a young and exceedingly enthusiastic divine, 1s as fol- lows: ‘Set off the South and what is the consequence? Do you get rid of embarrassment, discord, division, strife? No, sir, you multiply divis- ions. There will be secessions in the Northern Conferences, aren if Bishop Andrew is deposed or resigns. Prominent men will abandon your church. I venture to predict that when the day of division Core and come I believe it will from the present aspect of the case—that in ten years from this day and perhaps less, there will not be one shred of the distinctive peculiarities of Methodism left within the conferences that depart from us. The venerable man who now presides over the Northern Conferences may live out his time as a bishop, but he will never have a successor. Episcopacy will be given up; presiding-eldership will be given up; the itinerancy will come to an end, and congregationalism will be the order of the day.” | The vote on the Finley resolution was taken on the Ist of June, and resulted in its adoption by the vote of 111 to 69. Of the yeas four were from the Baltimore Conference, and one from Texas—the only ones from a conference within slave-holding territory. All the members from Ten- nessee Conferences voted against the resolution as follows: Holston Con- ference —B. F. Sevier, S. Patton, T. Springfield, Tennessee Conference R. Paine. J. B. McFerrin, W. L. P. Green, T. Maddin; Memphis Con- forence—G. W. D. Harris, S. S. Moody, William McMahon, T. Joyner. An attempt to declare the action advisory only was laid on the table by a vote of 75 to 68. On the same day, June 3, a series of resolutions pro- posing the formation of two General Conferences was referred to a com- mittee, which failed to agree, and on the 5th, the following ‘declaration of the Southern members” was presented by Dr. Longstreet: “The delegates of the conference in the slave-holding States take leave to declare to the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, that the continued agitation on the subject of slavery and abolition in-a portion of the church, the frequent action on that subject in the General Conference, and especially the extra-judicial proceedings against: Bishop Andrew, which resulted on Saturday last in the virtual suspension of him from his office as superintendent, must produce a state of things in ‘the South which renders a continuance of the jurisdiction of the General Conference over these conferences inconsistent with the success of the ministry in the slave-holding States.” This declaration was signed by all the members of the Southern Conferences, and by J. Stamper from the Illinois Conference, and was then referred to a select committee of nine, with instructions that if they could not devise a plan for an amicable adjustment of the difficulties thenwy _ a Ogee , ‘ oe : ‘ z : — - — a See " a : a * ~ aii Tet [eae — Sea mek yor ne rans — - ~ 7 Cen en ee a se asco nanan 1 Bim aa essa i ne an arent one mae 2m r - ee eae ae . . a "i 7 ed nrwncers ae a - cone Re Oe eer te : £ See = e : saanenee Sete ae ¢ = = Eee = te ti) rs ictus spans Bis =e. prio eS ee * a < <= “ . a , 5 g = ; : = — = H — neal FES - en . eens a anim eee) ae te a Se <3 . a Ea TEs es 7 ; ; ns Ta ae ~- ~ | ; = es = ss pn tt = SAT ERT z are RIS Ey a - = 2 ae nner cme ~ - ae ae v= -— nian SS ree ; jal ceo 3 — : 4 = aa fe eas So ~ wee - See VES - Se nates ean ae - i 5 a — mae sa ee = 1 : Sey ES ri * oo — 7 . 2 —_ = = om ae sem iabee eaa Stell ie eri 5 erie = a ye ia ” : Seni = nae —— S EEEEEeeieeateitan a Senn oe csimarmaiioe a See aa gee - eee: ee ae Pamame Cisigeonsat Sees Sea a —. aa a = * < es ripen VP ae v ma - i ~ 3 ms a aes =i 7 gee ae Sait aoe ~ ~ aete “ Bi eet i ae . 676 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. existing in the church, on the subject of slavery, to devise, if possible, a constitutional plan for a mutual and friendly division of the church. On the 7th of June this committee reported a plan of separation, which after much discussion was adopted—four of the resolutions by an average vote of 141 to 11, and the remaining seven and the preamble without a divis- ion. In the resolutions provision was made for an equitable division of the book concerns in New York and Cincinnati and the chartered fund, and all the property of the Methodist Episcopal Church in meeting- houses, parsonages, colleges, schools, conference funds, cemeteries, ete., within the limits of the Southern organization was secured to the South- ern Churchyso far as the resolution could be of force. The Southern delegation to the General Conference issued a eall for a convention to be composed of delegates from the several annual confer- ences within the slave-holding States, in the ratio of one to every eleven members, to meet in Louisville, Ky., May 1, 1845. When this conven- tion met Bishops Soule and Andrew presided, and after full deliberation it declared the Southern Conferences a distinct church, under the name of “The Methodist Episcopal Church South.” The first General Confer- ence of this church met at Petersburg, Va., May 1, 1846. It was com- posed of eighty-five delegates from sixteen Southern Conferences, those from Tennessee being as follows: Holston Conference—Samuel Patton. David Fleming, Timothy Sullins, Thomas K. Catlett, Elbert F. Sevier. Tennessee Conference—John B. McFerrin, Robert Paine, Fountain E. Fitts, Alexander L. P. Green, John W. Hanner, Edmund W. Sehon. Samuel S. Moody, Frederick G. Ferguson, Ambrose F. Driskill. Mem- phis Conference—Moses Brock, George W. D. Harris, William Mc- Mahon, William M. McFerrin, Arthur Davis, John T. Baskerville. By this conference Rey. William Capers, D. D., and Rev. Robert Paine. D. D., were elected bishops. At the time of the separation in 1845 there were in the Southern Church about 450,000 communicants, and in 1860 797,205. During the civil war this number was considerably reduced. In 1875 there were 37 annual conferences and 737.779 communicants, of whom 4,335 were Indians and 2,085 colored, and 346.750 Sunday- school scholars. As was naturally to be expected, the three conferences in Tennessee adhered to the Methodist Kpiscopal Chureh South. In 1840 the num- bers of members in each of these conferences was as follows: Holston Conference—White members, 25,902; — colored members, 2,420; local White members, 21,675; col- ored members, 4,405; local preachers, 298. White members, 12,497: z : ~ ‘ mn ee. preachers, 304. Tennessee Conference Memphis Conference— colored members, 1,995; local preachers, 183.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. O07 The traveling preachers in each conference were as follows: Holston, 70; Tennessee,109; Memphis, 69, In 1845 the Holston Conference reported 95 traveling and 327 local preachers, and 34,414 white, 4,083 colored, and 108 Indian members. ‘Tennessee Conference reported (in 1846) 153 traveling ministers. 33.219 white and 8,036 colored members, and Mem- phis Conference reported (in 1546 ) LOL traveling and 310 loeal preach- ers. and 23.111 white and 6,003 colored members. The boundaries of the Holston Conference were fixed by the General Conference of 1874 so as to include ‘East Tennessee and that part of Middle Tennessee now embraced in the Pikeville District; that part of Virginia and West Virginia which is now embraced in the Rogersville, oy Abingdon, Jeffersonville and Wytheville District south of the line of the Baltimore Conference, and including Jacksonville; the line between the Baltimore and the Holston Conferences running straight from Jackson- ville, in Floyd County, to Central Depot in Montgomery County, so as to embrace in the Holston Conference the territory known as the New Hope Circuit; that part of the State of North Carolina which les west of the Blue Ridge; a small part lying east of said ridge, embracing the Catawba Circuit, and that part now in the Wytheville District; and so much of the State of Georgia as is included in the following boundary: Beginning on the State line of Tennessee at the eastern part of Lookout Mountain: thence to the Alabama State line; thence north with said line to Island Creek, and with said creek and the Tennessee River to the State line of Tennessee, and thence to the beginning, including the town of Graysville, Ga.” In 1875 this conference reported 171 traveling and 294 local preach- srs, 38.087 white, 140 colored, and 176 Indian members, and 23,226 Sun- day-school scholars. In 1880 the report was 161 traveling and 290 local preachers; 44,279 white. 48 colored, and 148 indian members, and 28,541 Sunday-school scholars. In 1555 the following was the report: 158 traveling preachers, 305 local preachers, and 46.529 white members, neither colored nor Indian members reported; the number of Sunday-school schol- ars was 35.116. When the Federal Armies took possession of East Ten- nessee many of the Methodists in that section desired the services of the Methodist Episcopal Church. and under authority given by the General Conference of 1864, Holston Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church was organized, its first session being held at Athens, Tenn., June 1, 1865. The numbers reported to this conference were as follows: 48 traveling and 55 local preachers, 6, 107 members and 2,425 Sunday-school scholars. In 1876 the numbers were 105 traveling and 237 local preach- ers. 23.465 members, 10,413 Sunday-school scholars, 190 churches val-: eee ea EE ~ — = ee intone ail aR se lipaciglindiat SScbaindiab aia betiinhergadsa eas sanitation dato tatiana einige TREE, eS oh TLE rT ET A KM A ms Cee 678 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ued at $173,485, and 11 parsonages valued at $7,077. The boundaries of this conference, according to the discipline of 1876 were, on the east by North Carolina, north by Virginia and Kentucky, on the west by the western summit of the Cumberland Mountains, south by Georgia and the Blue Ridge, including that portion of North Carolina not in the North Carolina Conference. The statistics of the Tennessee Conference Meth- odist Episcopal Church South for 1846, have been given above. In 1874 ‘tc limits were so determined as to include Middle Tennessee, except the Pikesville District. In 1876 it reported 198 traveling and 331 local preach- ers. and 41.297 members. In 1880 the-numbers were as follows: 198 trav- eling and 343 local preachers, 46.428 white. and 15 colored members; 22, - 562, Sunday-school scholars, and the collections for missions amounted to $7,303.80. In 1885 the report from this conference showed 169 travel- ing and 314 local preachers, 52.865 white, and 11 colored members; 24,- 675 Sunday-school scholars. and $12,610.65 collected for foreign mis- sions. and $3,368.20 for domestic missions. The Tennessee Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church was erganized at Murfreesboro, October 11, 1866, by Bishop Clark, under authority of the General Conference. At this time it reported 40 tray- eling and 49 local preachers, 3.173 members, 2,548 Sunday-school schol- ars. and 13 churches, valued at $59,100. In 1868 its boundaries were so determined as to include that portion of Tennessee not included in the Holston Conference. In 1876 the statistics were 96 traveling and 206 local preachers, 12,268 members, 8,309 Sunday-school scholars, 142 churches, valued at $206,940, and 7 parsonages, valued at $2,500. Un- der authority of the General Conference of 1876 this conference was divided by separating the white and colored work. The statistics for 1877 are as follows: 41 traveling and 193 local preachers, 11,6338 mem- bers, 8,329 Sunday-school scholars, 197 churches valued at $137,028, and 15 parsonages valued at $4,000. The Memphis Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church South, a part of the statistics of which have already been given, was set off from the Tennessee Conference by the General Conference, which met in Bal- timore June 1, 1840. At the division of the church in 1845 it adhered to the other Southern conferences. Its original boundaries were as fol- lows: ‘‘Bounded on the east by the Tombigbee River, Alabama State Line and Tennessee River; on the north by the Ohio and Mississipp1 tivers; west by the Mississippi River, and south by the line running due east from the Mississippi River to the southwest corner of Talla- hatchie County; thence due east to the southeastern corner of Yallabusha County; thence in straight line to the northwestern corner of OktibahaHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 679 County; thence due east to the Tombigbee River.” In 1874 the south- ern boundary was changed so as to conform to the State line between Tennessee and Mississippi. In 1871 there were in this conference 278 local preachers and 27,833 members. In 1876 the following was the re- port: 125 traveling and 276 local preachers, 31,627 ernie and 15,726 Sunday-school scholars. In 1880 there were 140 traveling preachers, 238 local preachers, 33,329 white members, 18,610 Sunday-school schol- ars, and amount of collections for missions, $6,021.60, and in 1885 there were 127 traveling preachers, 233 local preachers, 28,584 white mem- bers, 21,884 Sunday-school scholars, and collections for foreign missions, $6.757.62. and for domestic missions, $1,032.41. The convention which organized this church, in 1845, at Louisville, favored the establishment of a book concern, and appointed two book agents-—Rey. John Early and Rey. J. B. McFerrin—to receive proposals for the location of the book concern, and also moneys and contributions for building up the same, requiring them to report at the time of the General Conference to be held at Petersburg May, 1846. This conference provided for a book concern, with Rev. John Early as agent, and assist- ants and depositories at Louisville, Ch arleston and Richmond. ‘The “plan of separation” contemp lated an equitable division of the common property, but the General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church subsequently pronounced the plan of separation null and void and. re- fused to abide by the settlement of 1844, upon which the Methodist Episcopal Church South took the ease to the civil courts and secured a decision in its favor. The decree relating to the book concern was given April 205, 1854. The proceeds of these suits were as follows: Cash, $993.334.50: notes and accounts transferred, $50,575.02; book stock, ),000; accounts against Richmond and Nashville Christian Advocate, 39,500; presses at Richmond, Charleston and Nashville, $20,000, and from. the chartered fund, $17,712; aggregate $414,141.62. The total amount realized from these various sums was $386,153.63. The General Hl $ Conference favored a book concern proper for the South, and accordingly the committee brought in a plan for a book establishment at the city of Nashville for the purpose of manufacturing books, to be called the Pub- lishing House of the Methodist Episcopal Church South, to be under the control of two agents and a committee of three to be called the book committee. In August, 1854, the agents purchased in Nashville a lot fronting on the public square sixty-eight feet and extending back to the Cumberland River nearly 300 feet, upon w hich buildings were erecte Yb! from three to four stories high, costing in the aggregate $37,282.52. In 1858 the General Conference determined to have but one agent, butSeen ee = iedinnd yim rename —~ ee met Es = — s wt Ge ISS. Iai AI la NT a RN I ec ee rT See A e ee a ee ATI batten a a eer, ss Se eee wee ee areas rm “ = re a e re Seta tes - - ae . oe ene: = ——— a a aa alia NS Bie dle aie ul Spares esa ; ora pec ’ > - ad ae an Ee Sse niger ee Se . ; Spe ces earn Sasa ia Tic ticap a poe eae a ee ~ a — “ we : == K 3: anemia ape A a : ea a OE I cage tenet 2 created the office of financial secretary. publishing house ance, $117,417.40. ] 680 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. May 1, 1883, the assets of the were $309.574.61, and its liabilities SOQ ieee bale The Methodist Protestant Church which was separated from the Methodist Episcopal Church in 1830, mainly on account of differences ‘egarding church polity, found a few adherents in Tennessee. The Meth- odist Church seceded from the Methodist Protestant Church in 1858 on the question of slavery, and there were also a few adherents of this churchin Tennessee. But the numbers of neither were never large; hence a detailed account, either of their history or doctrines is not deemed ad- The division in the Methodist Protestant Church having been caused wholly by slavery, after the abolition of slavery by visable in this work. the civil war, the two bodies formed a reunion in 1877 at Baltimore. At the time of this reunion the Methodist Protestant Church had in its Ten- nessee Conference 18 itinerant ministers and preachers and 1,209 mem- bers. and in its West Tennessee Conference 17 itinerant ministers and preachers and 1,140 members, while the Methodist Church had 6 preach- ers and 230 members. tion with the great revival has been referred to in preceding pages. The work of the Presbyterians in ‘Tennessee preceding and in connec- In company with Rev. Charles Cummings in East T’ennessee was the Rev. John Rhea. a native of Ireland, and whose name is closely associated with the formation of New Bethel Presbyterian Church, in Sullivan Coun- ty. These two were the first Presbyterian ministers in T'ennessee. They both accompanied Col. Christian’s expedition against the Cherokees south of the Little Tennessee River. mentioned in the Indian chapter. After this expedition Mr. Rhea returned to Maryland with the intention of bringing his family to Tennessee. but while making preparations for the removal. died there in 1777. His widow and family, however, re- moved to the Holston settlement. reaching their destination in 1779. They, with other Presbyterians, became members of New Bethel Church, located in the fork of Holston and Watauga. In 1778 Samuel Doak was ordained by the Presbytery of Hanover on a eall from the congregations of Concord and Hopewell, north of Holston tiver in what is now Sulli- van County. Preaching here two years Rey. Mr. Doak removed to Little Limestone, in what is now Washington County, in which latter place he remained over thirty years. In connection with the Rey. Charles Cum- mings in 1780, he organized Concord, New Providence and Carter’s Val- ley Churches, in what is now Hawkins County, New Bethel, in what is now Greene County, and Salem at his place of residence. In 1783 or 1784 Providence Church was organized in Greene County and the Rev. Sam-y HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 681 uel Houston called to the pastorate, serving the church four or five years when he returned to Virginia. The Rey. Mr. Doak opened a classical school, which in 1785 was chartered as Martin Academy, the first insti- tution of the kind west of the Alleghanies. In the same year Hezekiah Balch. a member of the Orange Presbytery, united with Rev. Samuel Doak and Rev. Charles Cummings, in a petition to the Synod of the Car- olinas, that a new _ presbytery be formed west of the Alleghanies, in accordance with which petition the Presbytery of Abingdon was formed. It was separated from Hanover by New River and from Orange by the Appalachian Mountains, and extended indefinitely westward. In May of the next year Abingdon Presbytery was divided and Transylva- nia Presbytery created, comprising Kentucky and the settlements on the Cumberland. The pioneer columns of emigration moved through the territory of Abingdon Presbytery to occupy the country beyond the mountains. For a number of years after its formation the Presbyterian body within its limits was in a state of constant internal agitation, resulting im a schism in 1796. The troubles were incr vased if not originated by the visit in 1782 of the Rev. Adam Rankin, of Scotch-Irish parentage, but born near Greencastle, Penn., who was a zealot, in modern parlance a crank, upon the subject of psalmody. His opposition to singing any other than Rouse’s version of the Psalms was a sort of monomania; while oth- ers were almost as strongly in favor of Watt's version. On this subject the controversy waxed very bitter. In 1786 the synod instituted an 1n- vestigation and adopted measures which it vainly hoped would settle the dispute, and for a time satisfactory results seemed to have been reached and peace attained. But a difficulty of a different kind succeeded. The Rev. Hezekiah Balch, who removed to Tennessee in 1784, caused great trouble to the early Presbyterians, by persistently preaching ‘‘Hopkinsian- ism,” a complicated system of religious thought which it is not the prov- ‘nce of this book to discuss. By indiscretion in his preaching he pro- voked determined opposition. ‘The subject being at length brought be- fore the presbytery, a majority of its members voted to dismiss the case. Five prominent members, three of whom belonged in Tennessee, V1Z. : Doak, Lake and James Balch, withdrew and formed the Independent Presbytery of ‘Abingdon. The case came before the Synod otf the Caro- linas and at last before the General Assembly which severely disciplined the seceding members and also Rev. Hezekiah Balch, upon which the seceding members submitted and the Presbytery of Abingdon was consti- tuted as before. At this time the Presbytery was bounded as follows: From New River on the northeast to the frontiers on the Tennesseere a PTR a eer A th eames eee alps | is : : i Sn Ae Sen ee Ny eos = son ; mien — - nd 6 in RE eee ce é a : ee eta tena aims ne E ee = semen ened Syn Se yas Od = = pg Siang Ae . Mcgee + pene Snes oe : —- = ana ae = < Ss a aks F neers on ees ss i ni = nee ; a ae a pinnae Y - = = ee aad ; SE = — — a : eke a me : * pcre. Sekt oncanls = a ——————— —<——— a ———————————— 682. HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. River, and from the Blue Ridge of the Appalachian Mountains to the Gariberland Mountains. It contained thirty-nine congregations, eleven of them in Virginia, three in North Carolina and twenty-five in Ten- nessee. In 1797 the Presbytery of Union was set off from Abingdon, embrac- ine Rey. Hezekiah Balch, John Casson, Henderson, Gideon Blackburn and Samuel Carrick, living in Abingdon Presbytery in Tennessee, Rey. Samuel Doak, Lake and James Balch. In 1793 the city of Knox- ville was laid off and the Rev. Samuel Carrick commenced laboring there and at the Fork Church at the confluence of French Broad and Holston. four miles distant. Mr. Carrick was the first president of Blount College, retaining that position from the time of its establishment in 1784 to his death in 1809. New Providence Church was established at the present site of Maryville in 1793 or 1794, by the Rev. Gideon Blackburn, who was licensed to preach by the Presbytery of Abingdon in 1792. After peace was made with the Cherokee Indians, he undertook a mission to that na- tion and by his self-sacrificing labors among them laid the foundation for the subsequent successful mission of the American Board among the Cherokees. In 1799 Greeneville Presbytery was laid off from the upper end of Union. Greeneville Presbytery was dissolved in 1804. The Presbytery of Transylvania had charge of the churches on the Cumberland River until 1810, when the Presbytery of West Tennessee was erected with four members. In this year the Rey. Gideon Black- burn left Maryville, where he was succeeded by Rey. Isaac Anderson, who was the principal agent in establishing the Southern and Western Theological Seminary, incorporated as Maryville College in 1821. In 1811 he took charge of Harpeth Academy near Franklin and preached in five different places within a radius of fifty miles, one of those five places being Nashville, his efforts resulting in the establishment of a church in each place, these churches being erected into a Presbytery. Churches and ministers rapidly increased in Middle Tennessee. The Presbytery of Shiloh was created in 1816, from the Presbytery of Muhl- enburg in Kentucky and the Presbytery of West Tennessee, Shiloh ex- tending nearly to the southern portion of the State. In 1823 Dr. Black- burn was succeeded in Nashville by the Rey. A. D. Campbell, who was himself succeeded in 1828 by the Rey. Obadiah Jennings. In 1824 Dr. Phillip Lindsley came to Nashville as president of Cumberland College, which was changed to the University of Nashville in 1826. In 1829 the Presbytery of the Western District was organized with five ministers, and in 1830 the first Presbyterian Church in Memphis was established. Following is given briefly the synodical relations of the differentHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 683 presbyteries which were wholly or in part in Tennessee: At the forma- tion of the General Assembly the Presbytery of Abingdon was attached to the Synod of the Carolinas, but in 1803 it was transferred to the Synod of Virginia. The Presbytery of Greeneville belonged to the Synod of the Carolinas. The Presbytery of Union belonged to this synod until 1810, when it was transferred to the Synod of Kentucky. In 1817 the Synod of Tennessee was organized, being composed of te Presbyteries of West Tennessee, Shiloh, Union and Mississippi, they being detached from the Synod of Kentucky. The Presbytery of Mis- souri was attached to the Synod of Tennessee in 1818, but reanetonred to the Synod of Indiana in 1826. The Presbytery of French Broad was erected in 1825, and of Holston in 1826. The Synod of West T'ennessee was formed in 1826, consisting of the Presbyteries of West Tennessee, Shiloh and North Alabama, to which was added, in 1829, the Presbytery of Western District. In 1829 the Presbytery of Mississipp1 becente a part of the Synod of Mississippi and South Alabama, and the Synod of Tennessee was composed of the Presbyteries of Abingdon, Union, French Broad and Holston. These four presbyteries with those of West Ten- nessee and Western District, representing the strength of the Presby- terian Church within the limits of the State, contained in 1830 an aggre- gate of nearly 100 churches and 71 ministers. e From this time on until the year 1861 the Presbyterian Church in Tennessee continued to grow and prosper. In that year the General Assembly at Philadelphia passed what has since been known as the Spring Resolutions, which hopelessly divided the Presbyterian Church in the United States. All of the churches in Tennessee, as was to be ex- pected, cast in their lot with the Presbyterian Church South. The his- tory of this movement with its causes, as seen by the Southern Presby- terians, is given largely in the language of the minutes of the Southern General Assembly, and is here introduced. A convention of twenty dele- gates from the various Presbyteries in the Confederate States of Amer- ica met at Atlanta, Ga., August 15, 1861, of whom Rev. J. Bardwell was from the Presbytery of Nashville. This convention said with reference to the separation of the Presbyterian Church into two bodies: ““ While this convention is far from ignoring the pain ot separation from many with whom it has been our delight as Presbyterians to act in former years, it cannot conceal the eratification which it experiences in the contemplation of the increased facilities for doing a great work for the church and for God afforded by the severance of our previous politi- eal and ecclesiastical relations. “Our connection with the non-slave-holding State, it cannot be denied,, LE OT ie FPL AD BOE AEP LO ER GEE AT DE RE a ae a a M | i i ‘et } | : it i rae ) | | , nia | i : BI | ( ee Bye i} e i | | . } ! i | ile i | Heat | | pal ere alts ea) | Bey penal tail nal | Re eat gil nat | 1 nn by PME iat | sme Fela ial | PEE it i Beene (3) | | Hr VA tf ate al | MRR a ie | : Hit Bh ; i } j a | 1 ie 3 aR USP a | Ea { te mH) Avene i an ie a | ea eth hed | { i) He | ae | Wen Val ‘| Mig Hy i Bia | bey f | ne | tt i ' if Hh) . | : tt | Beak | | al | | ; i | : j | a e Yt on HI 1 | bail na Hi ab Hit { We a | Hi } tee } { eat! {} | | i) Ti | let } Mi 1a || | | | ti Tt / } || ty | Wi |i | WAY We aI ' aii Hi | ae ee ht ; Wi Wan f He} } ih it a ' Ta \ LS Ee Eee ee ae EOE eR ES LD ID PO ST STE IE TYR TS TE LT RT LET NS MR SN RATER AE GP 684 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. was a great hindrance to the systematic performance of the work of evangelization of the slave population. It is true that the Northern por- tion of the Presbyterian Church professed to be conservative, but the opposition to pusocial economy was constantly increasing. Conserva- tism was only a flimsy covering for the evil intent which lay in the heart of the Northern churches. In the last General Assembly Dr. Yeomans. a former moderator of the assembly, regarded as the very em- bodiment of conservatism, did not hesitate to assign as a reason for the rejection of Dr. Spring’s resi lution that the adoption of it, by driving off the Southern brethren, would forever bar the Northern church against all efforts to affect a system of involuntary servitude in the South.”’ At a meeting of ministers and ruling elders which met at Augusta, Ga.. December 4, 1861, for the purpose of organizing a General Assem- bly of the Presbyterian Church of the Confederate States of America, the following members from Tennessee were present: Synod of Mem- phis—Chickasaw Presbytery, William Y. Frierson and H. H. Kimmon; Memphis Presbytery, John M. Waddel, D. D., and J. T. Swayne; the Western District, James H. Gillespie; Synod of Nashville—Holstcz Presbytery, J. W. Elliott and S. B. McAdams; Knoxville Presbytery, E. O. Currey and Joseph A. Brooks; Maury Presbytery, Shepard Wells; Nashville Presbytery, R. B. McMullen, D. D., and.A. W. Putnam; Tus- cumbia Presbytery, James H. Lorance and L. B. Thornton. The title of the Presbyterian Church of the Confederate States of America, and also the confession of faith, the catechism, the form of government, the book of discipline and the directory of worship were also adopted, only substituting the words Confederate States fo: United States. At this session of the General Assembly of the Presby- terian Church of the Confederate States of America an address was de- livered setting forth the causes that impelled them to separate from the church of the North, in which they said: “We should be sorry to be regarded by the brethren in any part of the world as guilty of schism. We are not conscious of any purpose to rend the body of Christ. On the contrary our aim was to permit the unity of the spirit in the bonds of peace. * * * * * We have separated from our brethren of the North as Abraham separated from Lot—because we are persuaded that the interests of true religion will be more effectually subserved by two independent churches. Under the circumstances under which the two countries are placed they cannot be one united body. In the first place the course of the last assembly at Philadelphia conclusively shows that should we remain together the polit- ical questions which divide us as eitizens will be obtruded upon ours HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 68! e church courts and discussed by Christian ministers and elders with all the acrimony, bitterness and rancor with which such questions are usually discussed by men of the world. A mournful spectacle of strife and debate would be the result. Commissioners from the Northern would meet commissioners from the Southern conferences to wrangle over the question which have split them into two conferences avd involved them in fierce and bloody war. They would denounce each other on the one hand as tyrants and oppressors, and on the other as traitors and rebels. The Spirit of God would take His departure from these scenes of confusion, and leave the church lifeless and powerless—an easy prey to the sectional divisions and angry passions of its members. * 2 - * * * * The characteristics of the man and the citizen will prove stronger than the charity of the Christian. We cannot condemn a man in one breath as_ unfaithful to the most solemn earthly interests of his country and his race, and com- mend him in the next as a true and faithful servant of God. If we dis- trust his patriotism our confidence is apt to be very measured in his piety. The only conceivable condition, therefore, upon which the church of the North and the South could remain together as one body with any prospect of success, is the vigorous exclusion of the questions and passions of the former from its halls of debate. The provinces of the church and State are perfectly distinct. The State is a society of rights, the church is the society of the redeemed. The former aims at social order, the latter at spiritual holiness. The State looks to the visible and outward, the church to the invisible and inward. The power of the church is exclusively spiritual, that of the State includes the exercise of force. The constitution of the church is a divine relation, the constitu- tion of the State must be determined by human reason and the course of events. ‘‘Had these principles been sturdily maintained by the Assembly of Philadelphia, it is possible that the ecclesiastical separation of the North and South might have been deferred for years. But alas for the weak- ness of man those golden visions were soon dispelled. The first thing that led our presbyteries to look the question of separation seriously in the face, was the course of the assembly in venturing in determining as a court of Jesus Christ, which it did by necessary implication, the true interpretation of the Constitution of the United States as to the kind of government it intended to form. A political theory was to all intents and purposes propounded which made secession a crime, the seceding States rebellious and the citizens who obeyed them traitors. We say nothing here as to the righteousness or honesty of these decrees. What 43iengpemnarencaeiooeisal esemnte aa # eee ome arimeg it eehan. S zi perenne ns ane ee EET gee Lint ee ee ae | Ss - . = Se a m ns Sails Te ic. a ee OT ~ oma a * = ‘ am ; ‘ cea eee a a ocgert a Ap rah Ee aa ine ra = i — = z ~ = mes = 7 = em _ aay — rman ~ a a: - PRR Ea ae an ye Sport Ae RPE MPO ——— : . ~ —~ ; - . : _ : . ats ss suas eas ; ; Sas cain Saaainan - = — a = ston a ———- a ee eee Ca Aer eee = -—— a — i On ; ee a =e a ae _ = = ae — tae noe e wom B er “ CES —o i" pee es ai poe a fh \ ql i i Spee prea cg nee ne eee ai eee ies Fics a tetas > rest aE a oe ee TT Lee ee = 4 - : ae ae eS ae see meet FS, == ae pe “a me Or nore a nner ; re - ade ———— ; a anes : Se S Sot = henry EE get SS Raa nae ~ aan : eee Ng ee Te a = : SoM = a a TR i < rea + i a A NL ASAE AL A NI AD OT ae eS a EOL OC ELL O ELLE A E —<$<—<—<——— es 686 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. we maintain is that whether right or wrong the church had no right to make them. She transcended her sphere and usurped the duties of the State. ‘The asse and fro by the waves ot populace ; like Pilate it obeyed the clamor of the multitude. and though acting in the name of Jesus, it kissed the scepter 1 bowed to the mandates of Northern frenzy. h the immediate occasion of separation was the course of the mbly. driven from its ancient moorings, was tossed to an¢ “ Thoug General Assembly at Philadelphia in relation to the General Government and the war, there was another ground on which the independent organt- zation of the Southern chureh could be scripturally maintained. ‘The of the church does not require a formal bond of union among lievers throughout the earth. It does not de- like that of Rome, nor a strictly council unity all the congregations of be mand a vast imperial monarchy like that to which the complete development of Presbyterianism would naturally give rise. As the unity of the human race is not disturbed by to countries and nations, so the unity of the spiritual king- ither broken nor impaired by separation and division its division 1n dom of Christ is ne ‘nto various church constitutions, and so forth.”’ ventured to lay before the Christian world their The same assembly ,eir conclusion was that the ehureh had no right views of slavery, and tl to preach to the South the extirpation of slavery any more than they had to preach to the monarchies of Europe and the despotisms of Asia the doctrine of equality, unless it could be shown that slavery was a sin. For if slavery were not a sin, then it was a question for the State to settle, The assembly then attempted to prove that slavery was not at variance with the Bible, and therefore not a sin. The argument on this point can not be here given, but it was the same that was always relied upon to prove that slavery was not necessarily a sin. Thus was the Pres- byterian Church of the South launched upon its individual existence. The minutes of the General Assembly do not give any statistics of value previous to 1863. The fund for church extension was then but $149.75, of which $100 had been appropriated to a church in Tennessee, and $30 to one in Georgia. In this year according to the best estimate that can be made there were 5,830 members of the Presbyterian Churehi in Tennessee. In 1865 the name of the church was changed to the Presbyterian Church of the United States. Thus the Spring resolutions compelled the organization of the Southern Presbyterian Church. The necessary result of political legislation by the General Assembly of 1861 was to force the entire Southern constituency out of that connection. The Southern Assembly earnestly asserted that the church was a non- secular, non-political institution, that it was wholly spiritual in its natureHISTORY OF TENNESSEE, 687 and mission, and entirely separate from and independent of the State. and this position it has ever since maintained. This conception of the true nature of the Church of Christ has caused the Southern Presbyte- rian Church to reject all overtures made by the Northern General] Ne sembly looking toward a reunion, for both Old and New School Presby- terians in the North (a distinction se arcely known in ‘Tennessee ) ) per- sisted in the utterance of political doctrines, which. whether true or false. they were inhibited from utteri ing by the Bible and by their own statute law. ‘These utterances, which the Southern church regards illegal, re- main unrepealed and upon the records, preventing the two churches from uniting into one. No disavowal of them has been made, as of words in- consider ately uttered in times of excitement, and-until such action shal] be taken by the Northern ehurch it is improbable that a reunion wil] ever be effected. In 1866 in Presbytery of Memphis there were 1,184 communicants; the Presbytery of the Western District. 1,058; Presby- tery of foletont 987: Presbytery of Knoxville, 123; Presby tery of Nash- ville, 1,320. and in the Presbytery of Alabama. 1.164. Total, 5.836. In 1870 the following were the number of communicants: Presby- tery of Memphis, 1,913; Presbytery of the Western District, 1,034: Presbytery of re 1,571; Presbyter y of Knoxville, 856; Presbytery of Nashville, 2,074; Pr esbytery of North Alabama, including 4 churches in Alabama, 12 in Mississippi and 23 in Tennessee, 1,804; a total of 9,252. In 1880 the following were the statistics: Presbytery of Mem- phis, 2,041; Presbytery of the Western District, 939; Presbytery of Columbia, 1,713; Presbytery of Holston, 2,030; Presbytery of Knoxville, 1,227; Presbytery of Nashville, 3,388; a total of 11.338. In 1885 the statistics were as follows: Presbytery of Memphis, communicants, 2,055: churches, 36; Sunday-school scholars, 1,448. Presbytery of the West- ern District, communicants, 1,375; churches 25: Sunday-school schol- ars, 533. Presbytery of Columbia, eommunicants, 1,599; churches, 25; Sunday-school scholars, 1,061. Presbytery of Holston, communicants, 4,136; churches, 38; Sunday-sehool scholars, 1,241. Presbytery of Knoxville, communicants, 1,314; churches, 25; Sunday-school scholars, 1,098. Presbytery of Nashville, communicants, 3,393; churches, 34; Sunday-school scholars, 2,673. Total communicants, 11,872; churches, 183; Sunday-school scholars, 8,054. The Baptists also profited by the great revival, but perhaps not to the same or a proportionate extent, as did the Methodists. They were in Tennessee as early perhaps as any other denomination. In 1781 they had six organized churches holding relations with an association in North Carolina, which, with a few others, were in 1786 formed into theSal alpen ec ae ie: la NB ag en A a a na Re en TS a A LE OE IE TT 688 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Holston Association, the first association formed in the State. Among the first Baptist ministers in East Tennessee were James Keel, Thomas Murrell, Matthew Talbot, Isaac Barton, William Murphy, John Chastine, Tudence Lane and William Reno. These ministers usually settled on farms and made their own living by tilling the soil or by teaching school, preaching Sundays, or at night in schoolhouses, in private houses, in 1m- provised meeting-houses or in the open alr, as the case might be. In 1790 the Holston Association had 889 members, and in 1800 it had 37 churches and 2,500 members. In 1802 the Tennessee Association was organized in territory in the immediate neighborhood of Knoxville. Some of the minister's connected with this new organization were Duke Kimbrough, Elijah Rogers, Joshua Frost, Amos Hardin, Daniel Layman and William Bellew. In 1817 Powell’s Valley Association was organ- ‘zed with 12 churches. In 1822 Hiwassee Association, consisting of 10 churches. was organized, which, in 1830, was divided into two associa- tions, the new organization being named Sweetwater Association, and be- ing composed of 17 churches and 1,100 members. In Middle Tennessee the first Baptist Church was organized it is be- lieved in 1786, by Joseph Grammer, on Red River. In 1791 the “Red River Baptist Church” was founded on the Sulphur Fork of Red River. This and other churches in existence at that time were organized into the Mero District Association. Soon afterward other churches were or- canized in the vicinity of Nashville: Mill Creek Church, four miles south of the city, Rey. James Whitsitt, pastor; Richland Creek Church, : six miles west, Rev. John De La Hunte (afterward Dillahunty), pastor, and another church a little further west, of which the Rey. Garner McConnico was pastor. On account of. internal dissensions this association was dis- solved. and in 1803 the Cumberland Association was formed. When this association became too large it was divided into two, the new organi-. zation being named the Red River Association. In 1810 the Concord Association was formed, its territory having Nashville for its center. In 1822 this association was divided and Salem formed with twenty-seven churches. Among the ministers active in this part of the State in addi- tion to those mentioned above were the following: Joseph Dorris, Daniel Brown, John Wiseman, Joshua Sester, John Bond and Jesse Cox. Up to this time there had been but little if any trouble in the church respecting doctrines. There was very general if not universal assent to the great fundamental doctrines of the church, which were strictly and with some of the ministers hyper-Calvinistic. These were particular and unconditional election and reprobation, that Christ died only for the elect, that none of the elect could by any possibility be lost, and that none ofHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 689 the non-elect could by any possibility be saved. But now the doctrine of election and the extent of the atonement, whether it was general or limited in its design, began to agitate the church. A similar contro- versy occurred in eastern Kentucky about 1780, resulting in a division of the denomination into regular and separate Baptists. The result in ‘Tennessee was the same, only more widely felt. The origin of this con- troversy in ‘'ennessee seems to have been as follows: Elder Reuben Ross, who had emigrated from North Carolina in 1807, settling near Port Royal, Montgomery County, and preaching mainly in that and Stewart County for many years, during his early ministry became much troubled and perplexed over the doctrines of election and predestination. He could not reconcile with his own ideas of justice the thought that God in the plenitude of His wisdom and goodness had doomed to ever- lasting misery and to eternal bliss separate portions of the human race, from before the beginning of time, without reference to their merits or de- serts, simply because it was His own will and pleasure so to decree. His study of the sacred Scriptures led him to the’ opposite conclusion. The sacred writings declare that God’s tender mercies are over all His works, that He is no respecter of persons, but in every nation he that fears Him and works righteousness is accepted of Him. Upon his arrival in Tennessee Elder Ross found his fellow Baptists entertaining rigid Calvinistic views with great tenacity, and although out of respect for the opinions of the many great and good men who oO oO had lived and died in that faith he had not publicly opposed their doc- trinal teachings, yet he could not but doubt their correctness, and in order to fully satisfy his judgment of the Biblical soundness of his own views he brought to bear on the study of this question all the faculties of his mind, using all the means in his possession to the investigation of a sub- ject which he felt to be one of the most important in the entire range of Christian theology. In the Old Testament no passage bearing upon this subject is more remarkable perhaps than that found in Ezekiel, chapter xviii, verses 21 to 32 inclusive. These various texts seemed to him to prove conclusively that man’s salvation is conditional instead of uncondi- tional, and the more he studied the Bible the more settled was he in the conviction that this is the true position. The underlying principle of ends accomplished by the adoption of means is everywhere visible in na- ture and the world, and using this as an analogy Elder Ross had his con- viction strengthened that salvation, if obtained at all, is obtained or achieved by or through efforts put forth by ourselves, or that it is condi- tioned on the employment of proper means. The first sermon in which this doctrine was clearly and distinctly enunciated was preached in July, 1817,SE i ee nea eee ene F Se are. ee en : _ = sion aspee ag tincomecnener snr” NT PD h eres o fk 0 i ea Cy a xh ae pr ae Ee ee roe eae ed age ae ca - 5 = > —_- a oe aa FT > ams ~ og: eae ET > iS. i ae ae eens ae = Site tenia Sper TE a ET ST aig SaTe, rece ——————— wet ae one ren aya eee ee Seip gp ns) emp meaner noe ee vein ia ss —_ IS tile ida 3a Ec Ss a CR ge gE ~ enn aergre diegoriorayeiumpin sear a ee Ne eee 20 : ———— ‘Raga ep a he emer Sn i aa lt eee pees: eS AT ET IE Se ee oe EE LOT A EO IER OI I A . a ee ener te ——— 698 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. light upon the history of this church, is here introduced, copied from the “Memoirs,” by Bishop Mercer: “On the 8th of August, 1857, the Bishop was called to consecrate a new church at Riverside, in the Eastern part of his diocese, built by Col. N. and the relatives of his wife. time when what is now generally known as “ Ritualism”’ had gained con- This was ata siderable footing in some of the larger and more advanced Eastern cities, but had yet to plant its first footstep among the mountains and valleys of Tennessee. On arriving at the church, accompanied by Bishop Polk, he beheld a cross on every gate, three crosses on the roof and one on the belfry. On entering the church he found the font at the south door, and on the altar and superaltar a large movable eross, two vases for flowers, and two very large candlesticks, and five other crosses, with multiform devices upon them. This was rather too much for the uninstructed taste of the Bishop. He had not been initiated among the more ‘advanced’ of his brethren. He was too old-fashioned to admire or even tolerate such novelties; therefore, at his command, these insignia were all re- moved before he would proceed to the consecration. Great offense was taken by the worthy family that erected the church, and no regular sery- ices were ever after held in it. It was permitted to fall to decay, and no vestige remains to mark the occasion but the site itself, one of the loveli- est that could possibly be chosen for.a house of God.” Ten years after the consecration of Bishop Otey there were, besides himself, thirteen resident clergymen in Tennessee, and the number of A noticeable feature in the proportionate growth is the inerease in the city parishes above communicants had grown from 117 to about 400. that in the country, Christ Church, Nashville, and Calvary Church, Memphis, far outstripping the others in numbers, importance and influ- ence. At the end of another decade there were seventeen clergymen, be- sides the Bishop, and seventeen parishes, besides the mission stations, Quite a number of substantial church edifices had been erected in various parts of the State, a few of them being of stone, as in Nashville and Clarks- ville, and some of wood, but the most of brick. In 1860, the last year for which there is a Journal of Convention for Bishop Otey’s time, the number of clergy was twenty-seven; the number of organized parishes, twenty-six, and the number of communicants, 1,506. and the entire number of communicants was estimated at 800. For the next five years the great civil war not only effectually checked the growth of the church, but almost destroyed what had been accomplished with such great labor. The attitude of the Episcopal Church was generally the same as that of Bishop Otey, with respect to the war. He was strenu- ously opposed to both war and disunion, if both could be avoided con-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 699 sistently with the honor and safety of the South; but when he saw that war was inevitable, he nerved himself for the contest, and for final advice and counsel to his flock; but the shock was too great for his once power- ful, but now enfeebled system, and no doubt shortened his life. He died on April 23, 1863, having directed that the marble which might cover - his remains should bear no other inscription than his name, the dates of his birth and death, and “The First Bishop of the Catholic Church in Tennessee.”’ The return of peace found the Episcopal Church in Tennessee with- out a bishop. A call was promptly issued for a convention to assemble in Christ’s Chureh, Nashville, to consider the question of electing a suc- cessor to Bishop Otey. Quite a full representative convention assembled on September 8, 1865, when it was found that the Rev. Dr. Quintard was almost unanimously the choice of the convention. Since his election the progress of the church has continued to be steady though slow. In 1884 there were thirty-six white parishes, forty mission stations, and about 4,000 communicants. The charitable institutions of the diocese are numerous and creditable. There is the Orphan’s Home at Knoxville, a similar institution at Memphis, where also is St. Mary’s School, for girls; St. James Hall is at Bolivar, Fairmount, near Mount Eagle, and there is a fine school at Cleveland; there is a male school at Cleveland, one at Knoxville, one in Chattanooga, one at Mount Pleasant, one at South Pittsburg, but above all is the University of the South. Closely identified with the history of the church and education in Tennessee is the history of the University of the South at Sewanee, Tenn. ‘To Bishop Otey is due the honor of the first conception of the university. In 1836, in an address to his convention, he urged the ne- cessity of an institution maintaining the highest degree of scholarship, and sought the co-operation of adjoining dioceses in founding a great university. He was warmly seconded in his efforts by Rey. Leonidas Polk, then a minister at Columbia, who, subsequently becoming Bishop of Louisiana, took a prominent part in the organization of the University ot the South. In 1860 an endowment of over $500,000 and a domain of 10,000 acres having been secured, the corner-stone of University Hall was laid with great ceremony. In the war, the endowment was lost, and the corner-stone, a massive block of native marble, was broken in frag- ments and carried away as relics by the Union soldiers. Misfortune proves-institutions as truly as it does men. Under the energetic leader- ship of Bishop Quintard the university began life anew in 1868, with its bare domain and its admirable organization as its only inheritance. Its beginning was an humble one; but maintaining from the first a high stand-ar a ow ocr sea eapiessonyente ie aaeel cae a Sg a eapiatin’ oa Sania con: Cee aaa aa Ae eee Sanremo ——— aaa i ai i ay ; i syle iy Ly ‘ al by ee eae A (aoe i } i bret aya ii i] Ee A ia | Ti en a; Bl Tl | | by 7 ii oy i is al ORD de ai eae: . Bie i : al : | i: | | nt ih tT BIER ver (ea Va A | t eH patty { i i a ae all {! i Bena gal MAPEE 1B e311 | : Fee adi ’ i} NST TB el a aie Ih era te Wy A AY if F he | i i) \ | ES ni | rad af! Hf Met) yal : Hi { | . : ; ' rigs tae ETT nT - ee es Tee a ee RG in Ne a et ae aa ae wee a earl preieatin erent aE LT ———— Ee Eee 700 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ard of education, it has steadily advanced, till now with 300 students, sub- stantial buildings, and a high reputation at home and abroad, it can see that these past trials have developed strength and proved the wisdom of its scheme of education. The university 1s to-day organized substantially according to the original plan, which was formulated after a careful study of the leading colleges of Europe and America. A plan which has thus stood the test of adversity is worthy of consideration, Among the causes of success are first, the concentration of the means and patronage of a large section in one institution; second, the maintenance of the highest scholarship (the requirements for degrees here are as severe as at Yale or Harvard); third, the elevation and location, free from malaria, pulmonary trouble and catarrh; fourth, it keeps a home in- fluence over the students by boarding them in private families; fifth, it controls a domain several miles in extent, prohibiting the sale of liq- uors, gambling and other evils incident to university towns (it is father of the four-mile law in Tennessee); sixth, it is not a sectional but a general institution, having more students from the North than any other school in the South. It is not narrow or bigoted, but teaches a Catholic Christianity as the basis of morality, and religion and science going hand in hand in all completeness of investigation. The vice-chancellor, Rev. Telfair Hodgson, D. D., is executive head of the institution. Elected to that responsible position in 1879, he has shown rare administrative pow- ers, and much of the material prosperity of the university is due to his wise management. Reference has been made in connection with the account of the great revival to the Rey. Barton W. Stone. He was probably the first in Ken- tucky and Tennessee to preach the creed which subsequently constitu- ted the doctrines of the reformed or Campbellite Church, as it was called in earlier days, but to which, in more recent times, the name of the Disciples of Christ or Christian Church has been applied. As a result of the labors of the Rey. Barton W. Stone a numerous body had originated in Kentucky and extended somewhat into Tennessee, separat- ing themselves from the Presbyterian communion, having for their object a union of Christians upon the Bible alone. But the movement which gave immediate origin and distinctive char- acter to the church of the Disciples was started in Pennsylvania, in 1809, by Thomas Campbell aided by his son Alexander. Their original pur- pose was to heal the divisions in the religious world, and to establish a common basis of Christian union. This, it was thought, could be accom- plished by taking the expressed teachings of the Bible as the only guide. After some time a considerable society was formed; and, curiouslyYY. . W835 te ANNAN Le ~ Do et ‘ We TH) \ oe NSS ah AA\\NS SS Kt \ | re NY Rs HH 2 YESS —— i \ > = hil kK SS Kit a SS HH | = = i} ry | & we c 5 f ti | TM too ne Ke iP \\ : | Fr \ Ina 1 i ia | Pre ra « 3 DP bP i } yb i i Pay ih Rt nN iN | rN if i ‘ ; D | yy) | a) \ < int bs te “ a2 ‘At — | i wv tA 2? ta — ij } j 8 if | | Ba! | Ki Ia i t {| oS iB | el — Ss = i/ = i} Hie {| | { \\\ << ' HAN L HA IN “Zs 1 1 O een ee Cc ij) 5 | _ {iii aa NM b= z < > ee 4 |S ie = - “~ fr} ey | { ii | ti It MMI YW \Y pM WALA | (i t | \ \ \ \ \ \\\ , j i WUT Ch | i! i | HT | 1} F nH | th i {iit \ 5 (i HAH Cy \\\ — MI — © Hi} ~ | Oo \ Co \] nD I ‘o 1 \} iy | A, | S Ae AMAA | HAA & } Ni \ | _ CTH HTIT | | ak : ih ' m wi Mi Mi a HAN AN HT | K i } | Hi i | (ui | I | f {iH \ Wily Nh} Nn Mul | { Mh | HA } | i ily i i] WAN NWT Hi AILI| i il aT | ii} ’ yA AAT HI Hh A | Weld i AIM i HM iett . te SE Sen ~- ne tase RFS Es ouenneesieis ae a = - ee, ~ et a oe a i aoe TERE kd OR MMS. Ses Re ee SUNN LaR aa » a RLS TEE TES Bees: aD emer Meet prt ted Pe eS ee = oa —— PMN Ears | ) ‘ 1 ‘ ms Ss nee mt Nig AC te eg a a ae a pe Lee ees een Sea RS” agaHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 701 enough, as in the case of the Rev. Barton W. Stone, from the Presbyte- rian Church. This society, by the evolution of thought upon Bible teaching, became one of immersed believers, and soon afterward united with the Red Stone Baptist Association, upon the stipulation that no standard of doctrine or bond of union should be required other than the Holy Scriptures. After some time another doctrine was discovered in the Scriptures, viz.: ‘Baptism for the remission of sins,’ which became a distinctive feature of the reformation. Controversy upon these doctrines increased in the Baptist Church, with which Alexander Campbell was then associated from 1813. when he united with the Red Stone Association in 1827. when he began to form separate church organizations, entertaining -his own peculiar views. In order to properly present his view of the doctrine of baptism for the remission of sins, the following extract from his ‘“ Christianity Restored,” published in 1823, is introduced: “If then the present forgiveness of sins be a privilege and a right of those under the new constitution in the kingdom of Jesus, and if being ‘born again,’ and being ‘born of the water and the spirit,’ is necessary to admission, and if being born of water means immersion, as is clearly proved by all witnesses, then remis- sion of sins in this life cannot be received or enjoyed previous to bap- tism. * * The remission of sins or coming into a state of acceptance being one of the present immunities of the kingdom, cannot be received or enjoyed by any one previous to baptism.” Very soon after churches began to be formed on this and the other doctrines of Mr. Campbell, which embraced most of those held by the Evangelical Churches; new organizations soon sprang into existence in Tennessee, embracing the new doctrines, and here and there a Baptist Church went over in a body to the new faith. One of the first of these latter was the Baptist Church at Nashville, Tenn. Of this church, in May, 1826, Rev. Philip S. Fall had become pastor, and it soon became evident that he sympathized with the doctrines taught by Alexander Campbell. The church found themselves in hopeless controversy. The Mill Creek Church, as the senior church of this section, was requested to take action in the matter, but the Nashville Church declined to appear before its bar. The latter church then adopted the ordinance of weekly communions. The minority, powerless in the matter, withdrew, and met for worship October 10, 1830, in the court house. In January, 1828, the Nashville Church adopted the full form of the Disciples’ worship, and in May repealed the entire Baptist creed. The church at this time num- bered about 450 members. In 1831 the “Stonites” in Kentucky and other Western States united with the Disciples and a strong sect or 44ete ee ee re - Pe ae ames a - - i oe an ee - 7 7 = ; Sacer aes pee agg Po a i ia BIAS ire ay * core wireipe oie Soe scien = a aes pee SSPE eT TT a oe — Sar ieee ae Tee RE Sas apache ane ie om eh faa aie ig Sh mt ate nates Prcibety ar - ina { mares si aoe ee Da Se Team Shy ey mm oy ota aaa aa nie C6 ee ie _ » Saye apne ~ eT ene emdetes = CL d \ nore. epctaneerel sab ay x ee . —ae Fe AS Rey corre eo oar — meres = 3 vm . 3 b as ae Re a naa . = “ ee = me - — _» meer = ees serpesmemreneersterehrspoene Tos pt ae te es eu 2 NEI a a ae ee eae ee = . 102 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. added to the number which the Campbells thought hen they commenced their reformation. endent in its nature, made a few years denomination was altogether too numerous W A movement somewhat indep later than this of the Rev. Philip S. Fall, deserves eareful mention. It was that of Elders John Calvin Smith and Jonathan H. Young. They had both been immersed by Elder Isaac Denton and had united with the Clear Fork Baptist Church, Cumberland County, Ky., in 1821. In Sep- tember, 1822, Young and his wife transferred their membership to Wolf Church, in Overton County, Tenn. Ina few years they received . of the same faith and order” in Kast Tennessee, continuing there until 1829, when they moved back to the Wolf River Church, of -which John Calvin Smith had in the mean- istor, as also of Sinking Spring Church, Fentress County, ig of the letter for membership inthe Wolf River iver letters from this echureh to a ‘“churel time become pé Tenn. After the readu Church, Young asked permission to explain his position relative to the frst article of the “Abstracts of Principles.” After he had stated his a short argument i) their favor Smith also objections thereto and closed the propriety of the first article, and then expressed his doubts as to proposed that a vote be taken on t his wife into the church. They w ship, notwithstanding their objections Smith and Young became a wider and wider creed, and they were advised by their brethren to be more cautious, or they would run into Campbellism. A very prominent Baptist preacher said to Smith, ‘““You will take a little and a little until finally you will he reception or rejection of Young and ere unanimously received into fellow- to the creed. The preaching of departure from the Baptist ‘swallow a camel.’”’ Young was ‘nformed that he must account to the ehurch for preaching the doctrines which he did, to which he replied that he was received into Wolf River Church with the definite understanding that he was opposed to the use of human creeds and confessions of faith in the church of Christ. He preached an able discourse at Sulphur Meeting-house, in Cumberland County, Ky., setting forth fully his sentiments on the dis- puted premises. The Wolf River Church was investigated by a commis- sion appointed for the purpose and after able discussions of the question, lasting from July to September, 1831, Young, seeing that he must, if he remained in the Baptist Church, accept the first article, and consequently the whole of the Philadelphia Confession of Faith, proposed that all who were willing to accept the Bible alone, as the only authoritative rule of faith and practice, should rise and stand with him. Seven or eight arose to their feet and stood with Young, and. the ehureh proceeded immedi- ately to cut them off for improper treatment of her order. Elder JohnHISTORY OF TENNESSER. 103 C. Smith was also on the same or similar grounds excluded from mem- bership in the Baptist Church. Smith. Young and the others who were eut off, with a few brethren living in the neighborhood, formed them- selves into a church which became largely influential. The formation of other Christian Churches in Tennessee followed with great rapidity during the two decades from 1830 to 1850. Follow- ing is a partial list of these churches, with the dates of their organiza- tion, so far as could be ascertained. and the counties in which they were located: Two of these churches were organized as early as 1816, though probably as Baptist Churches. The church at Bethlehem, and at Wil- son’s Hill, Globe Creek, Marshall C ounty, in 1823. Lil erty Church, Marshall County, separated from the Ric bland Association of United Baptists for communing with Christians and assisting to set apart a dea- con in that church. At that time it had 126 members; in 1846 it had 450. In 1825 Roane Creek Church, in Carroll County, was organized, and in 1828 Berea Church, in Marshall County. was organized; in 1831 Smyrna Church, Cedar Creek, in Marshall County, and New Herman Church, in Bedford County ; in June, 1832, the church at Rutland’s Meeting-house, in Wilson County, separated from the Baptists by layi Ing aside their abstract principles and agr eeing to be governed by the Bible alone, and the church at Tally’s old field was or ganized this year; in 1833 the church at Paris, Henry County, was or ganized, and in 1844 they built a very neat church edifice; March 30. 1834, Sylvan Church, Sumner County, was organized with nine members; in 1844, it had 115: the church at Buamleyel Fork, Cannon County, aiid that at South Har- peth, Davidson County, were organized this year; in 1835 Rock Spring's Church, Rutherford County, and Sycamore Church, Davidson County, were organized, the former having, in 1844, 130 members; in 1836, Leb- anon Church was or ganized with nineteen members, and reor ganized in 1842; the church at Bagdad, Smith County, was organized in 1835; in 1888, Lewisburgh Church, in Marshall County, and in 1839 Big soni Church, in Wilson County, were org’ anized: in 1840 Trace Cr an Church, Hlackson County, and that at ihoneis Meeting-house, Marshall County, and in 1841 a church at Blackburn’s Fork, and at Cane Creek, Lincoln County, and the Torny Fork. Church, Marshall County, were also organ- ized; in 1842 Hartsville Church, in Sumner County, Salt Lick Chen in Jackson County, and the church at Meigsville, on the Big Bottom, were organized; in 1843 the church at Teal’s Meeting-house, Jackson County, Pleasant Hill Church, Bue keye Church, Flynn’ s Creek, Union Church, Richland Creek, Marshall County, and the Cave Creek Church, Marshall County, were organized, and that at Murfreesboro reorganizediow Ramp ee i gees * wi aan ny eerie he aan . ie i jaa H hs 1 Me { eH th Hane Pe ea me Baye ail a 2 i an e141) Pa genta) | Uh eat Rea | fare} | { ani | EARLE tt f a ear ide a Lip SEER ST ag SS RR me menace — Pitan P= ari Uragelien a OE eee ~~ Sas ee ae ae HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 704 in 1844; the church at Rich Meeting-house was organized, and there date of organization not known, the following: 3 1p Washington County, with 304 members; 4 in Garter County, with 301 F 2in Johnson County, with 124 members, and 2 in Sullivan County with 252 members; in Rutherford County, besides Rock Springs Church, the date of the organization of which has been given above, there Creek Church with 4() members, Cripple Creek Church and Big Creek Church with 60 members; in Warren County Hickory Creek and Rockey River Churches; in Wilson County Liberty Church, on Stone River, besides small congregations at Cypress Creek, Blue Water and Bluff Creek; in Livingston County there were § 970 members; in McMinn County 4 churches with 150 were in existence, members; were the Spring with 130 members, churches with members. From 1849 to 1850 churches organized at about the same rate, of this denomination continued to be since which time their numbers do not jet ca OEE PU. ie amp By Pe = zs — 5ST a os q ae SL eT i ‘ | ey! i a | i | 4 ‘| iB ia ; yy aa as Ue pened tat | . i rele ci A { tM Eh pa | Whi GO ate He eal A i Ee ae PR eee Pee iar t Peal Rta haa bi ; as ji ti ey it p 33 i Nay ik ie it BE) Peano yeah oa | eA: A a eee at | Bei ae PRE Pa ee Peet | hee tai We eae) Ty eee EL La ET Ta | ER ey, ath { ila th Pep tt) i aE f) ne ‘ unaaat ieee Ahan Hh Wee pee eae cee OU ae Hiei ! RE iki baal | ai t Ta et aa Ee | matiay the i S fief ah Gre aes Ned He lf Li . Bee ee A Ra ee ae ee BE SP . ade ae Ue NT ea Heat i ah 7 Pe ait BPR tie bee Hay | PHA i) | Pai ty ahh aa ay ei Ce ath Ni HN He te en ae a I et ine a i mH Hie th at aH bes |) er i HI feral {analy ‘ te 1 i HI Vit 4 | eit \ # es LL TE Fpl pg aR a A rene me seek a home beyond the mountains. 12 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE, have towering shafts of marble erected to their memory, yet John Sevier, who founded a great State and gave it forty years of public service, died and not only no monument marks his grave, but even his burial place is unknown. Gen. Robertson,* “the father of Tennessee,” was born in Brunswick County, Va., on the 28th of June, 1742. While he was yet a youth his parents moved to Wake County, N. C., where he grew to manhood and married Miss Charlotte Reeves. had already obtained the rudiments of an education, and as James When that event oc- eurred he Wake County at that time was the center of the intelligence and culture of the colony, he had laid the foundation of the broad and liberal char- acter for which he was ever distinguished. He had also become imbued with the spirit of liberty which was invading every American colony, and in 1770, to escape the oppression of the tyrant Tryon, he resolved to Accordingly in the spring of that year, with a small party, of whom Daniel Boone is believed to have been the leader, he visited the few settlers who had already located on the Watauga, and being favorably impressed with the country decided to make his home among them. He returned to Wake County after having made a crop, and it is thought he participated in the battle of Alamance, May 16, 1771. Soon after that event, with his wife and child, he again set out on a journey over the mountains to the Watauga, which was reached in safety. Soon after his arrival it was determined to form some sort of government, and he took an active part in securing the adoption of a set of written articles of government, which all agreed to support. [In the early part of 1776 he was one of the committee who drew the pe- tition for the annexation of Watauga to North Carolina. As an Indian diplomatist, Gen. Xobertson had no superior and very few equals. In 1772 he was chosen to visit and pacify the Cherokees, who had been aroused by the murder of one of their number by a huntet. This he successfully accomplished, and by his courage, address and friendly manner won the regard of the chiefs. with whom he remained several days. ‘Two years later, in October, he participated in a battle with the Indians onthe banks of the Kanawha, whither a company under Col. Isaac Shelby had gone to aid the settlers in West Virginia, then in danger of destruction by the Shawanees and their allies. In July, 1777, the Cherokees having become troublesome, Gen. Robertson, co-operating with a force from Virginia, invaded their country and compelled them to sue for peace. During the same year he was appointed temporary agent *So much has been written concerning Gen. Robertson that only a brief outline of his life is here pre- sented.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Maths of North Carolina, and sent to Chota, ‘‘the beloved town” of the Chero- kees, where he resided for some time, and while there rendered himself popular with the chiefs. In 1779 Robertson determined to remove still further west. and in February, accompanied by a party of eight, he set out to examine and loeate land in the Cumberland, and to raise a crop of corn for the sup- port of those who were to come out in the fall. The hardships and pri- vations endured in the founding of the Cumberland settlements have been described in another chapter, and will not be here repeated. Dur- ing all of these troublesome times, and up to his death, Gen. Robertson was looked upon as a counselor and leader by all the colonists. Under the Government of the Notables he was the president of the committee or the judges, and upon the organization of Davidson County was one of the justices appointed to hold the county court. He was also the first representative of the county to the General Assembly of North Carolina, and continued by successive elections until the organization of the Ter- ritorial government. He was then commissioned by Washington major- general of the Mero District. As a legislator Gen. Robertson displayed the highest qualities of the statesman, and he could no doubt have attained eminence in a wider field. Although the Assembly of North Carolina had evinced a disposi- tion to ignore the settlements west of the Cumberland Mountains, he succeeded in securing the passage of many acts for the benefit of his county, notably among which was one providing for the establishment of Davidson Academy; another provided for a superior court of law and equity, and a third prohibiting the establishment of distilleries in David- son County. In 1795 he resigned his commission as commander of the Mero District, and the following year was appointed Indian agent. In March, 1805, he was sent on a mission to the Chickasaws and Choctaws, and in July following, in company with the Indian agent, Dinsmore, met the chiefs of the former nation and obtained a total relinquishment of the title to a large tract of their land east of the Mississippi. In No- vember a treaty was concluded with the Choctaws. During the war of 1812 Gen. Robertson rendered his last and greatest service to his country. Through his influence with the Indians, the Choctaws, Chickasaws and Cherokees, were induced to aid the United States against the Creeks and the British, and the people of Tennes- see were saved from the horrors of an Indian war. Gen. Robertson had long been subject to neuralgia, and while at the Chickasaw Agency he was seized with an attack of great violence, which ended his life Sep- tember 1. 1814. His remains were interred at the agency, where they* = Pn ee ey. 1 Sacee seas ST aaa r eI ane Paha Si aa aT ae, eet - abun aati ———— sak ——— Ba aia a pooner eae ey JN aa — wd ae a net epee PTE ees op ae eo ‘S S r { * — = = TNE Gc a (14 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. rested till the year 1825, when they were removed to the cemetery at Nashville. By his side now rest the remains of his wife who survived him until To 11, 1843. They had eleven children, seven sons and four daughters. ‘T'wo sons were killed by the Indians; one daughter died in infancy. Felix Robertson, one of the sons, was born at the Bluff January fe 1781, and was the first white child born in the settlement. The ancestors of Judge John Haywood emigrated from England at an early period and settled in the city of New York, from which place they moved to Norfolk, Va. The destruction of the town with the home of the Haywoods led the erandfather, William Haywood, to seek a home elsewhere. He moved to near the town of Halifax, on the Roanoke, N. ©. Egbert Haywood, the father of Judge John Haywood, became:a farm- er in the neighborhood. He was a man of ordinary means, and had little desire for books or social culture, caring more for field sports or the chase than literary attainments. : John Haywood, son of the above, was born March 16, 1762, at the family estate in Halifax County, N. C. The country afforded little opportunity for an education: not only were there few schools, but there were few educated teachers. The father being comparatively poor, he was unable to send his son to a foreign country or even a neighboring province to school, as was the case with those more favored by fortune. The want of public schools was in some instances supplied by private teachers. In his early life he attended a private academy taught by a fey. Mr. Castle, from whom he obtained a knowledge of the elements of an education. He acquired some knowledge of Latin, Greek; geography - and’ other branches. His knowledge of any one branch of learning at this time was general rather than special. At an early period in his career he formed a resolution to study law, a profession for which he was well fitted by nature. He was without books, without money, and without an instructor. He began his studies by reading some of Ray- mond’s reports, which were couched in the stilted and circumlocutory style of the period, and interspersed with innumerable Latin and French phrases. He soon rose to prominence at the bar. He made his first argument before the supreme court at the age of twenty-four. He dis- played such ability in this case as to attract marked attention, and he was no longer without clients. In 1794, as attorney-general, he procured not only the reconsideration but the reversal of judgment by the supreme court of a case decided unconstitutional the year preceding. In 1794 he became one of the judges of the superior court of law and equity, a posi- tion which he held five or six years. While on the bench he collected the decisions of the supreme court of North Carolina from 1789 to 1798.-— HISTORY OF TENNESSER. W15 After leaving the bench he again began the practice, which he fol- lowed in North Carolina till 1807, when he moved to Davidson County. Tenn., and settled about seven miles from Nashville. The reputation Judge Haywood had made both as a lawyer and a judge in North Caro- lina soon brought him into prominence before the Tennessee bar. This was ata period when many persons were involved in suits over land claims and titles. Judge Guild, who was examined by Judge Haywood in October, 1822, for license to practice law, describes his visit to the judge as being somewhat peculiar. He found the judge lying out in his yard on a bull-hide in the shade. He looked as large as a sleeping bul- lock, as his weight was about 350 pounds. He found him grim, and when he told his business the judge began growling and grumbling, and said he did not see why he should be disturbed. He called two negro men, and had them take the bull-hide by the tail and drag him farther into the shade. He then began-a very long and searching catechism on the law. He grew very communicative, and was well pleased with his work. Then followed a long lecture of advice, covering almost the whole of moral and legal ethics. He is said to have been agreeable in his manner, fond of society, and entertaining to the highest degree in his conversation. He kept his law office and lbrary at his home in the country, and compelled his clients to attend on him there. Aside from his law studies Judge Haywood found time to pursue a wide field of literary pursuits. He published a work called “ Natural and Aboriginal History of Tennessee,” containing about 400 pages. In this he treats of the In- dians, their usages, ete., earthquakes, dreams, ghosts, goblins, bones of giants, pygmies, mastodons, caves and strange voices in air, portents, signs and wonders, all very curious and interesting. He also published in 1823 his ‘‘History of Tennessee,” a book of about 500 pages, covering the period of settlement from 1768 to 1795. The ‘“Hyidences of Chis- tianity”’ followed. Many of Judge Haywood’s conclusions in his literary works are based on yery little evidence. That close reasoning that char- acterizes his legal conclusions is followed in his other works; but 1s based upon insufficient evidence, and is therefore very often erroneous. Much of his writing is speculative and highly imaginative. One very curious argument Judge Haywood uses to prove that the Hebrews and Indians were the same people is to quote I Samuel, xviii: 27, to prove that the Hebrews scalped their enemies, as well as did the Indians. Many of his other arguments are in a similar vein. Judge Haywood died at his home near Nashville December 22, 1826; in the sixty-fourth year of his age. He died after a few days’ illness, his death being hastened from his great corpulency. Judge Haywood¥ 7 iar7 I a tannin ane tt Sa eee ere ee ee Fs —— — ee re a cael Se ato SOS Spel cea. Gas gr ieaaeek Cetieee. saa eapgat on Sexi eee eet OR eT tee ee ne. Date ea ta ee i ae ee < ey ee <' nek ao asia > _ > peepee EE ce es’ i sin mip, Bae Sees rer ales gta ee ar ype eee a a ae ince TTT ee a es Kat rie Saag coon SS - Sere ET ae «<> ns : Fa aigacet dh Saw * oe or: a i Ss — = Ti Se as oe eng rr errors st : es i os Se Ss Fess _ apa wr een = cee et = . eae : 4 Sn oars oi 4 mes ne { eo - is RF Gree ata " HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 716 left six children——three sons and three daughters: Thomas Haywood. a lawyer and teacher of classic education, died in 1868 near the Nolens- ville pike, about six miles from Nashville; Dr. George was a well-known physician of Marshall County; Dr. Egbert Haywood was a resident of rownsville. Haywood County; one of the daughters married Dr. Moore, of Huntsville, Ala.; a second married Col. Jones, of Tuscumbia, and the third married Col. S. Jones, of Limestone County, Ala. The ancestry of William Blount has been traced with certainty to the invasion of England by William the Norman in 1066. The name was originally Le Blount, and from the successful issue of invasion to the Normans the two brothers accompanying the expedition became owners of large landed estates. In 1669 Thomas Blount, great-grandfather of William Blount, with two brothers emigrated to Virginia, where one of the brothers settled and became the head of a long line of descendants. The other two brothers moved to North Carolina and settled in the vicin- ity of Albemarle. Jacob Blount, father of William Blount, was born im Bertie County, N. C., in 1726, and was married to Barbary Gray, a lady of Scotch ancestry, in 1744, by whom he had eight children. On fel death of his wife he married a daughter of Edward Salten, by which union there were five children. Jacob Blount was a member of North Carolina Assembly in 1775-76. His death occurred at his country seat in Pitt County in 1789. William Blount, eldest son of Jacob Blount, was born in Bertie County, N. C., March 26, 1749. Jacob Blount is said to have been a man of considerable estate, and to have educated his large family in accordance with his ample means and social standing. It is probable that the training of his sons was more in the line of the prac- tical than of the theoretical, that their training was more of action than of letters. and was married February 12, 1778, to Mary, a daughter of Col. Caleb Grainger. He and his father May 16, 1771, and all the brothers were leading spirits in the Revolu- William in early life rose to prominence by personal worth, participated in the battle of Alamance, tionary war. Her half-brother, Willie, was for a time his private secre- tary; was judge of the supreme court of Tennessee, and was governor of the State from 1809 to 18165. William Blount was a member of the General Assembly of. North Carolina the most of the time from 1780 to 1790. He was a member of the Continental Congress from that State in 1783-84, and again in 1786-87, His native State was active in the preliminary conventions which led to the final convention at- Philadelphia, in 1787, of which he was a member. When the action of the convention was referred to the States, Blount used his whole power in the State convention for its ratification.= j FROM PHOTO BY THUSS KGLLEIN & GIERS NAGHVILLE WitLIAM BLOUNT eeae yes — aaa ae ETAT Eee ae Se es a ee yg —- aR a Jigs anne ats ag amr mre LE Ra ee “to 7 Stal in Sie Ae i ENS EE. ag a sR a pee sine SRS | j MY , | Ai pal! ie) seal He |) i } Le lal i | i 1 i {Re é; = pee ean na en a TTT NE ait — ae ee Se pa mo 2% “aes => ee re . eres ete eee ne ita ao Soe eon errs nae Sx alia aa Pin iF pt ak REP a ee seen ON ci EG: A AEE cs See a an a ee ane yee ae 2a iHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ele He is said to have been “a vigilant agent of his State and the faithful] guardian of the interests of North Carolina” at the treaty of Hopewell with the Cherokees, November 28. 1785. He always took an active in- terest ‘in the Western settlements and was ever a zealous friend to the Indians. His good influence was used with them in securine some of the most important and liberal treaties with the Cherokees. @hoctame and Chickasaws. The ordinance and theact amendatory to it for the goy- ernment of the territory southwest of the Ohio River. passed August He 1739. This was after the second session act of North Carolina. which was intended to simplify matters and strencthen the hands of the Gen- eral Government. From personal acquaintance with Gov. Blount, made at the constitutional convention, and knowing his worth and acquaintance with: the affairs of the new Territory, Gen. Washington appointed him Territorial governor. His commission was received August 7, 1790, and on October 10 he entered upon his duties. He first took up his resi- dence at the home of William Cobb, at the forks of the Holston and Watauga Rivers, and called around him the ablest men of the Territory to assist in his government. By the unanimous recommendation of the Legislature, he was appointed by President Washington as superintend- ent of Indian affairs. He made a tour of inspection of the Territory to inquire into the wants and needs of the people. The Indians with whom he was to treat were included in the tribes of the Creeks, Cherokees. Chickasaws and Choctaws. This was one of his most difficult tasks. The boundaries of these were not well-defined and some of the stipula- tions of former treaties not earried out. Many white men had settled upon the territory of the Indians, and this gave cause for complaint by the Indians. British and Spanish intrigue was at work upon the Indians, and to prevent complications with these countries his instruc- tions were to adopt defensive measures only in dealing with the Southern Indians, although surrounded by from 30,000 to 50,000 warriors. Con- sidering the difficulties of the surroundings, he managed with commenda- ble prudence. Being restrained as he was, many private injuries were inflicted by the Indians, which he was unable to punish; hence arose complaints, the grounds for which he was not responsible. Goy. Blount called the Legislative council and the House of Repre- sentatives in extra session at Knoxville on June 29, 1795, to take steps toward the formation of a State constitution. An act was passed July 11, 1795, ordering a census and a yote on the question of forming a State constitution. The result of this poll was announced by the gov- ernor November 28, 1795, there being 6,504 votes for and 2,562 votes against a State constitution. On the same day he ordered a general 45aa maa. 2 Ta Se Sik eae a Sa ea ae Sosa ete Se ee x ey : ed le tae Sl ae = nay risen ae nce ype Ske-o x > a hag meats ana ESS militant ets = ok Ss ere adenad cSlrcinecatirenisrmmscege ans aoe pee msn ay i free ee Sense nt athens tre ci ——— 7 as SO SS ARERR 718 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. held December 18 and +19, for the election of five persons from each county to assemble in Knoxville January 11, 1796, to draft a State Bees citation. The final announcement of the passage of the act took place February 6, 1796. On March 30 the names of William’ Blount and William Cocke were proposed for United States Senators, and election to be on the following day were unanimously elected. The Legislature met again on July 30, and Congress in the meantime having declared the March election of senators illegal, from the fact that the State had not heen admitted, these men were again elected on August 2. Goy. Blount took his seat in the Senate December 5, 1796. July 3, 1797, President Adams sent a message to both Houses of Congress, stating that the con- dition of the country was critical. The grounds for this suspicion was some correspondence Mr. Blount had had with various parties, which led to the belief that he had entered into a conspiracy to transfer the territory of New Orleans and Florida to Great Britain through the influence of an English army and the assistance of the Indians, who were to be drawn into the scheme. Five days after the giving of the notice Mr. Blount was expelled from the Senate on a charge of having been guilty of ‘high misdemeanor, entirely inconsistent with his public trust and duty as a senator.” The vote stood twenty-five for expulsion to one against it. Mr. Tazewell, of Virginia, alone voted in the negative. On the yote of the impeachment of William Blount as a civil officer within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States, etc., it was deter- mined in the negative. ‘The vote stood eleven for conviction and four- teen for acquittal. It is claimed for Mr. Blount that if time had been given him he could have vindicated himself. So great was the confidence of the peo- ple in his innocence that Gen. James White, senator from Knox County, resigned his seat in the General Assembly of the State in his interest it is said, and the people of Knox County elected him to the vacant seat. Ata called session, December 3, 1797, he was unanimously elected speaker of hat body. He is described by Dr. Ramsey as a man ‘“‘remarkable for great address, courtly manners, benignant feelings and a most commanding presence. His urbanity, his personal influence over men of all condi- tions and ages, his hospitality, unostentatiously yet elegantly and grace- fully extended to all, won upon the affections and regard of the populace, He was at once the social compan- This inscription and made him a universal favorite. ion, the well-read gentleman and the capable officer.” on aslab in the graye-yard of the First Presbyterian Church in Knox- ville tells his end: “William Blount, died March 21, 1800, aged fitty- three years.”’HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. V19 Goy. William Carroll was born in Pennsylvania March 3, 1788. He had little advantages for an education, but was a man of extraordinary good sense. In 1810 he left Pittsburgh, Penn., and came to Nashville. He engaged in mercantile business in which he was very successful. On the outbreak of the Creek war he was appointed captain. His fine personal appearance, brave and courageous manner, knowledge of mili- tary matters, frank and noble bearing attracted the attention of Gen. Jackson, who made him one of his most trusted lieutenants. He took an active part in the battle of Talladega December 9, 1813, and contributed no little to its suecess. On the expiration of the term of service of the men Gen. Carroll was one of the most active in raising recruits for the very needy army of Jackson at Fort Strother. These forces. amounting to 900 men, were forwarded early in January, and on the 17th started for Emuckfau, where they met and defeated the Indians on the 21st, In a retrogade movement on Fort Strother the Indians attacked the Ameri- can lines on the 24th at Enotochopco, and were again defeated. On March 24 the army again started, and on the 27th was fought the great battle of Tohopeka or Horseshoe. In these engagements Gen. Carroll sustained his reputation for skill and bravery. He soon after returned home to take charge of the new levies for New Orleans. On November 19, 1814, he embarked at Nashville with 2,500 men, and hastened down the river to assist in the defense of New Orleans, that place was reached December 21, and in a few hours the men were in the position assigned them. On the final battle of January 8 Gen. Carroll occupied the position next to the extreme left. The center of Carroll was selected for the main attack. This was done on information that these men were militia. The British advance in column was made with great desperation, but was met with great coolness. There was an appalling loss of life in front of Carroll’s men. The military fame of Carroll and Coffee is indelibly linked with the fame of Jackson in the great achievements of that period. After the close of the war Gen. Carroll again returned to civil life. He was a very active business man, and brought the first steam-boat the ‘“‘Gen. Jackson,” to Nashville, in 1818. He continued in business till the finan- cial depression of 1818-20, when he met with severe reverses, which led him into politics. In 1821 he was a candidate and was elected governor of the State. He was re-elected twice in succession, but being constitu- tionally ineligible for a fourth term he gave way to Gen. Houston. He was again recalled and served six years longer. His official career as governor was characterized by clearness, good judgment and firmness. His official documents though not classical are noted for good literary taste. In 1813 he was led into a duel with Jesse Benton, brother of en eeSer Ge spe OAR = Sa mae oe Se — rare ee = " ee ess a ree ee 3 - ne ee COT ETT = : : -_ -~—- siieaale — ees — : hte RETA TR noe ns ee ae a = — Saabs bese > er me sie : ¢ ; ae ete — en Sal me oe eee: Sree ia tn ce et —— Fa i Eee ine — am Perens Sees Sg eek ea Ries i le ari RENEE SS aa “ Sets ciel 2 naan maammnlinen hire ainaaNaiiata wna saat SET Te an be SE aie sas FREI TS SM, ay pie st cere seared * scheme 7 " - —— oar ate eS om rsierere pe en aupena ones inane a - ; neni " . anoint ay - Reiiendinrserers : Sa = SSS Sees pense ona ‘ Fil Tr aime mo oo. ee ~~ = = = ~ — — _ = = = ~ = = — - = a2 - — aioe a : = m = = 5 ee Riss = me ees ; * ~- 3 Se aa ~ a eT aa EST Daa tele cies arin ora teens ~ pe en are tne = ie as ; : - — - . ws mr ta wie PTS POS PAIS. = = a ee OT St = : ie ; : one: _ Satie askin eeraiiiaeteti pcaee ae 3 Retna ale TE Eth os rie IS = — : ates = —— Remind sett ime ps rete Som v- taknatieolaniabeleelaoces és dbl eich emeleaehca einai talsheleie alien a —— = = = oo ere tnieroes ene wenger Sa ee a ee = a - wi Tee Se = Se ee ee ae SSS = : ast : ; : : a 720 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Gol. Thomas H. Benton. It seems some of the younger element -was jealous of Carroll’s popularity. bring about a collision between At last Jesse Benton was led into the quarrel and promptly challenged Carroll to a duel. Carroll ap hat Carroll should select some one else. Gen. Carroll Several ineffectual efforts were made to Carroll and some one of the young men. pealed to Jackson to act as his second, but the latter insisted t told Jackson that he believed there was a conspiracy to run him (Car- roll) out of the county. This angered Gen. Jackson, who promptly said that while he was alive Carroll should not be run out of the State. Jackson endeavored to bring about a reconciliation between the two belligerents and partially syueceeded. However, the duel was fought and both contestants received slight wounds. The part that Jackson took in this affair led to the altercation between him and Benton a few weeks afterward. The life of Carroll is summed up in the inscription on his monument: ‘Asa gentleman he was modest, intelligent, accomplished ; as an officer he has energetic, gallant, daring; as a statesman he was wise and just. Delivered an address In Nashville on March 15, 1844, con- eratulating Gen. Jackson and the country on the final passage of the act of Congress appropriating a sum of money to repay Gen. Jackson the amount of the fine with interest imposed upon him by Judge Hall, of New Orleans. This was the last public act of Gen. Carroll. -He died on March 22, 1844, in the fifty-sixth year of his age.” The ancestors of Andrew Jackson were long known near Carrickfer- gus,* in the north of Ireland. Hugh Jackson, the great-grandfather of Gen. Jackson, was a linen draper there as early as 1660, and as was the case generally in that county the same avocation was followed by mem- bers of the family for many years. Hugh Jackson was the father of four sons, the youngest of whom was named Andrew. Andrew was the father of Andrew Jackson, so well known throughout this country. The father of Andrew Jackson, the general, married Elizabeth Hutchinson, the daughter of a poor but respectable linen weaver near their old home at Carrickfergus. With his wife, two sons, Hugh and Robert, and several of his kinsmen, Andrew Jackson immigrated to America and arrived. in Charleston, S. C., in 1767, but soon moved toa settlement known as the “ Waxhaws,” near the line between North and South Carolina. The father settled at Twelve Mile Creek, near a branch of the Catawba River, in what was formerly called Mecklenburg, but now Union County, N. C. The family began work im clearing and cultivat- ing a piece of land, but it seems no title to it was ever acquired. In the spring of 1767 occurred the death of Mr. Jackson, a short time *The Crag of Fergus, or where King Fergus was drowned.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ize before the birth of Gen. Jackson. The body, with the family, was placed in a wagon and carried to the old church at Waxhaw, where the body was buried. Mrs. Jackson went to live with her married sister, Mrs. George McKemey or McCamie, where on March 15, 1767, the future President was born. Owing to the poverty of this brother-in-law Mrs. Jackson went to live with Mr. Crawford, another brother-in-law. who lived near the State line, in South Carolina. Here young Jackson spent the first ten or twelve years of his life. He might have been seen a tall, slender, long, sandy haired, freckle- faced, bright blue-eyed boy while attending an “old field school.” He was dressed in coarse coppered-clothes; and barefooted attended a school at Waxhaw taught by Dr. Humphries, but it seems he never attained great proficiency in any branch nor any great loye for books. The massacre at Waxhaw on May 29, 1780, was the first introduction he had to the horrors of war. Here were butchered 263 of the Whigs of the Carolinas, the wounded having received from three to thirteen wounds; among the number killed was his brother Hugh. Andrew was present at the engagement at Hanging Rock, but was too young to take an active part. He took Col. Davie at that time as his ideal commander, the dash and spirit of that enterprising officer well suiting the aggressive character of Jackson. Soon after this Jackson and his brother Robert, with many others, were captured by the British and Tories. It was while a prisoner that a British officer ordered Jackson to clean his boots, an order which he refused to obey on the ground that he was a prisoner and should be treated as such. A sabre stroke on the head and arm was received for his disobedience. An order was then given to Robert to do the work; another refusal and another wound was the result. The young Jacksons were crowded into a prison pen at Camden after the defeat of Gen. Gates on August 16, 1780. Here without food and clothing and badly crowded the suffering of the prisoners was intense. Mrs. Jackson, by ) sreat exertion, succeeded in securing an exchange of her sons and a few others. With these she started to a place of safety, forty miles distant. The elder son was wounded and suffering from small-pox. Andrew was compelled to walk through rain and mud, and burning with the fever of coming small-pox. Robert soon died and Andrew was reduced to death’s door. The suffering of the prisoners in 1781 induced Mrs. Jackson to go to Charleston, 160 miles distant, to nurse the sick. Here she soon alter died of ship fever. The disbarring of many Tory attorneys by the war opened a new and. lucrative field for Whig lawyers. ‘This led many young men to embarkSete see ee ae ee ' Crt | t RH aetiaa tl a ah int PY Oe ea He (mend Pe ae ii rae a , $ it aly if he ° Uraaet | i “tl EL Pyle tiie trea: ; reel abl Abt i eal iH if ay ' ( bs pe ae ilies ify Ay sabre diad . ay i fas ie We Pee art | 1 j 44 a 5 |; wey) uP tH ra iyi s ; a Berm cae) (ERE Ce en Ba i ey { i Ba meee gl Gia ¥ it ; Ngo! ihe heal ii } F | Fi Be i Ly | ; ny Hy Re eameer ell aS ‘ | | tf] | 4 ~- POT pease St eee ee ae : ee ae ae Terese TS Bocas . > - = x Se ~ — + = x oa ore : \ par ee ee + he om) eS ee : phere aes = < - business, occasionally going down the river trading. HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. in the profession, among them Jackson. He began the study of law with : ° 1 . é { { Spencer McCay, in Salisbury, 8. ©. Here it is said he played cards, fought cocks, ran After a short practice in North Carolina, of which little is known, Jackson de- where he remained during the years 1785-86. horse races and occasionally got drunk, but was never dissipated. termined to seek his fortune in the West. The difficulties between North Carolina and the State of Franklin had been settled. Judge McNairy, a friend and former associate of Jackson, had been appointed judge of the Supreme Court for the Western District, and Jackson obtained the ap- pointment of prosecutor for the same district. Others determined to follow. A party started from Morganton to cross the mountains to Jonesboro, the usual stopping-place this side of the mountains. The party left for Nash- seems not to have been ville bv escort in November, 1788. Jackson without cases. In the Davidson County Court in 1790 out of 192 cases Jackson had 42; in 1793 out of 155 he had 72, and in the July term he had 60 out of 135, and in 1794 he had 228 out of the 397. On the ad- mission of Tennessee as a State he resigned his attorneyship and was chosen first representative for the session by the Legislature, beginning December 5, 1796, and ending March 3, 1797. been present at the next session, beginning May 13, 1797, and ending July 10. 1797. Blount was expelled from the Senate July 8, 1797, and He appears not to haye on November 22 Jackson succeeded him. August 25, 17958, he was ap- pointed to the office of judge of the superior court of law and equity, and soon after resigned his seat in the Senate. He was noted while in Con- sress for the vigor with which he urged the militia claims of Tennessee on Congress. He resigned his seat on the bench in 1804, and again be- gan practice. ‘The salary of a supreme judge was only $600, and this doubtless led him to resign. It is said no reports of his decisions are extant, and that they were clothed in bad language, poorly spelled and ungrammatical—not technical but generally right. After leaving the bench he devoted his time to his profession and to He was very ag- He was insulted by Col. Waightstill, to whom he first applied to read law, in a case wherein Jackson was defeated. Waight- gressive as an attorney. still was challenged for a duel, which was accepted, and the duel fought without bloodshed. A quarrel arose between Jackson and his old friend Sevier. There was just a little favor asked, which Sevier did not readily grant, then an accusation concerning some land speculation in which Jackson accused Sevier of having a hand. In 1803 Jackson, who was still judge, opposed Sevier’s re-election. At a public speaking in Knox- ville, Gov. Sevier denounced Jackson: most bitterly and vehemently, andHISTOBY OF TENNESSEE. —~] bo went so far as to question Mrs. Jackson’s chastity. This threw Jackson into an ungovernable rage, and interference of friends only prevented bloodshed. A challenge soon followed. Sevier accepted ai Condition that the fight should be outside the State. Jackson insisted that it should be within the State. Each accused the other of cowardice. The matter finally ended without harm to either. In the fall occurred the duel between Gen. Jackson and Charles Dickinson. The melancholv ending of this encounter is well known. Dickinson fired first, severely wounding Jackson who did not fall, but coolly aimed at his antagonist and pulled the trigger, the hammer stopping at half-cock. He rarcaciced the weapon, took deliberate aim, fired and killed Dickinson. In 1813 occurred the encounter between Jackson and the Bentons. in which the General was severely wounded. The splendid military achievements of Jackson in the Creek war end- ing in his magnificent triumph at New Orleans on January 8, 1815, are facts of American history. The Seminole war again brought out his military genius, and his government of Florida at a very critical period showed his administrative qualities. There isa certain halo around mili- tary glory that captures the public mind. The name of Jackson was mentioned as early as 1815 by some of his admiring military friends. On July 20, 1822, the Legislature of this State formally nominated Jack- _son for president in 1824. This brought him prominently before the people. Col. John Williams who was United States Senator from Ten- nessee, was a candidate for re-election. To succeed he must carry the Legislature of the State. The election of Col. Williams meant the suc- eess of the Whig ticket and the defeat of Jackson’s prospects. It became necessary for Jackson’s success to defeat Col. Williams. The friends of Jackson staked all by nominating him for senator. His name and fame carried the day and he was elected by a large majority. In the presi- dential campaign of 1824, there were four candidates for the presidency, Gen. Jackson, William H. Crawford, Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams. Jackson had the largest electoral vote, also the largest popu- lar vote, but the matter being thrown into the House, Mr. Adams was elected. In 1825 Jackson resigned his seat in the Senate and returned home, but in October of the same year was again nominated for the presi- dency. The enthusiasm for him rose to a white heat, nor was the tongue of slander idle. In the clection of 1828 Mr. Jackson received 178 votes to eighty-three for Mr. Adams. So popular was Mr. Jackson’s first admin- istration that in 1832 he received 219 electoral votes to forty-nine votes for Mr. Clay. The military career of Jackson is also brilliant. He husbanded his aeeee ee ee a | punm estonia ile _ — : - > OU ee a. ie en a ln TE ; => ‘ Pee siostt ( 5 i , a I qa aE ti i en Pe ae A f Cath ia cL aoe a i i i f bape i nit i | i i it ii) ! a AY CR eae da iat 1 bb) Ce Lave | % a Tis i pape f Lai i) Hi, 1 a a | Pe apn a ta ih : Ete | Ae \ ha Vane 2 eet } SPRL) Pate | Heeb te Bal a i) BR RON a TE | OF Hi hoa) oe Per ant a | amet eel Bal Maat) 1 | Be eer i i Bean (ey a | h RE eo yl ; pia i) es aH We ea! Pee Cel ARO Hn 3 ih by { mil Peete TRU (i Pee Hanh trem et) i 0 WPiGe bathe Hana’. a bey eed Heth | Te WAM eee Pet Een I | att i i iit} ne ai i ii | i r i Fal) iH] ji | i] ee aR tT et ee Had? 1}! i i fae EE a ih Palit HA itt oe TH A ea Beer een h Maat EM te Gea TEED OBI tt ‘| HEH MAI iM | BAA | | Ht | | i it Wei tt | Hy int} | 1} Hi Cunt Le aH] eH a UR et lf HI ii Hy Hh} i hi Oe) eee Way} Mall been ee at walt i j aM Sat By i i ‘| i 1 ‘| | | | i ASS ae RE ee = See 1 ANTES errs <3es - 7T24 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. esources until the time for a blow, then it was struck with the fierce- He pushed his advantages to the utmost and never 1 ness of a gladiator. allowed his enemies time to recover. He often deceived them by a show of strength when he was really weak. His boldness and aggressive spirit made up for his deficiency in men and material. His administra: tive abilities may be more a question, yet whatever of error there might have been 1n them there will always be persons who will try to imitate his course. Many of his ideas were put into successful practice that would have been entirely impracticable if advocated by a man of less force. His aggressive administration did more to establish respect for American prowess than any other. His conclusions when reached were carried out. ‘His wonderful will and courage were the motor which carried him over all obstacles.”’ He stood by his friends and was a good hater of his enemies. His aggressive nature coupled with the love of his friends often led him into difficulties. All his biographers say he was not quarrelsome; this may be, but it seems hardly true. He loved horse racing and could indulge in the most bitter oaths; was also frequently officious in duels. ‘To all these things 1t may be said that public senti- ment was so little against these vices that they were looked upon as mere trifles. Jackson was not a profound scholar nor a great reader. He read men well and kept posted on the events of the day. His spelling has often been ridiculed. Parton says: ‘Jackson lived ata time when few men and no women could spell;” furthermore he spelled better than Frederick II, Marlborough, Napoleon or Washington. Even “O. K.” is said to have been written by him for ‘‘all correct.” A case from the docket in 1790 in Jackson’s handwriting, will illustrate how this error started. ‘‘A. Jackson presented a bill of sale which was approved and marked O. R.”’ The initials being O. R. instead of O. K:, are the ab- breviations for ‘‘ordered recorded,” a very common form of simplifying the expression. Jackson, though never a very polished writer or speaker, had the faculty of getting at the truth in the most direct way. His do- mestic relations were always the most happy. The death of Mrs. Jackson, which occurred on December 22, 1828, was a severe blow to the General. He himself died, without heir, at the Hermitage on June 8, 1840. Sam Houston, a very noted and somewhat eccentric individual was born in Lexington, Rockbridge Co., Va., March 2, 1793. His ancestors were Scottish Covenanters, who fled to the north of Ireland to escape per- secution. A number of them came to Pennsylvania about the beginning of the eighteenth century. The father of Sam was a soldier in the Rey- olationary war, and at the time of his death, in 1807, was inspector of a brigade. The mother with her nine children—six sons and three daugh-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. (25 ters—soon after moved to East Tennessee and settled in Blount County, near the Cherokee country. Young Houston learned to read and write before leaving Virginia, and on his arrival at their new home was sent to school to an academy in the settlement. While attending school he com- mitted to memory almost the whole of Pope’s translation of the Iliad. On his teacher’s refusal to teach him Greek and Latin, he left school in disgust, with the remark that he would never recite another lesson. By the influence of his elder brother he entered a store as a clerk soon after leaving school. Becoming disgusted with his clerkship, he suddenly left and went to live with the Indians. His tall commanding figure and daring exploits as a hunter soon made him a great favorite among the Indians. The chief Ootooteka adopted him as his son. He remained with the Indians three years and grew to manhood, in size being fully six feet in height, of handsome, fine figure. He left his friends, the Indians, as suddenly as he had left home before. He was now eighteen years of age, and on ,his return home he opened a school. He charged the moderate rate of $8 per year for tuition; one-third payable in cash, one-third in corn and one-third in domestic cotton cloth. He began his teaching in 1811, and soon had a flourishing school. The outbreak of the war with Great Britain afforded an opportunity for the display of his talents in a direction more congenial to his nature. In 1813 he enlisted as a common soldier, but soon rose to the rank of ensign. At the battle of the Horseshoe Bend, on March 27, 1813, he re- ceived a severe wound in the thigh from an arrow, and two balls in the shoulder. After the battle he was carried to Fort Strother on a litter. His wounds were thought to be mortal, but his robust constitution saved him. His bravery in battle made him a particular favorite of Jackson. After peace he was stationed at Knoxville as lieutenant, in charge OL a post, but was soon afterward sent to New Orleans. While there his old wounds broke out afresh and he was compelled to undergo a very dan- gerous and painful surgical operation. Atter a winter of suffering he went to New York, where his health improved. In 1816 he returned to Tennessee, by way of Washington City, and was stationed at Nashville. On January 1, 1817, he was appointed to carry out a treaty with the Cherokee Indians. The next year he headed a delegation of Indians to Washington. While in that city he was acct used of exercising too great zeal in putting a stop to the African slave trade through Florida, but wa fully acquitted on trial. On March 1, 1818, he resigned his commission in the army and settled in N ashville, where he began the study of law. After a course of six months he was admitted to practice, and began his labors at Lebanon, Wilson County. His rise was rapid. In Oc tober,Sard a iene ee vs -—— eee pea ee oan Oe at EE mega. oe ae 5 RE SERRE ER ON TIA A pe soone ek : Se — . mi ae pare ae ms SealneiEnneensbeeenetiereeee ee “ eee a ae ee ee iro nigga Filed OT Seem ts iba ence gna tang nea . pani BADE a a em a er en a 720 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 1819, he was attorney-ge sneral for the Nashville District, and in 1821 he was made major-ge eral of the militis . of the Western District. In 1823 he was elected to Congress, and again in 1825. He was elected govern- or of the State by the very flattering aon of 12,000. In January, 1829, Gov. Housion was married to Miss Eliza Allen, but from domestic infelicity he left her in April, resigned his office, gave up his candidacy for re-election. and again went to his old frie nds, the Cherokees, now be- yond the Mississipp1. His old adopted father, Ootooteka, again kindly received him, and by a council of the chiefs, on October 21, 1829, he was made a citizen of the Cherokee nation, with full power. Detecting frauds in contracts with the Indians he went to Washington in 1832, where he plead the cause of the Indians so strongly that it led to an investigation, which caused the suspension of seve ral clerks, and led to a personal en- counter between himself and W. R. Stansbury, of Ohio, in which the lat- ter received a severe castigation. Tor this offense Houston was arrested and fined $500, and was reprimanded by the speaker. President Jack- son. however, caused his fine to be remitted, and he left Washington in disgust and returned to the Indians in December, 1832. He soon after moved to Nacogdoches, Tex., and took a very active part in the ¢ affairs of that State. He was elected delegate to the conven- tion on April 1, 1833; while a me amber of that body he exercised great ‘nfluence over its deliberations. On the outbreak of war between Texas and Mexico. Houston was made commander of the militia of the eastern district, and in October, 1835, joined his forces with Gen. Austin, who was besieging Bexar. Gen. Austin offered to resign the entire command to Houston, who refused to accept. By vote: of forty-nine out of fifty Houston was made commander-in-chief of the Texan forces, but resigned March 2, 1836, because he was accused of wanting to make himself dictator. He was soon after re-elected commander-in-chief by the same vote. He took command of the Texan forces at Gonzales, March 10, which numbered 374 men. A force under Col. Travis held the Alamo against the orders of Houston, and were besieged and captured by Santa Anna and the garrison of 185 men massacred. A panic seized Houston’s men when the news reached camp that Santa Anna was advancing with 5,000 men. With difficulty Houston, who was absent at the time, col- lected his fugitives and fell back to Peach Creek. Here he was joined by 100 men, and soon after by 650 more. Being without: artillery he was unwilling to give battle; in the meantime Col. Fannin was ordered to join him with the garrison of Goliad, but the order was not promptly obeyed. The entire garrison was surrounded and captured by Gen. Urrea and 357 men were shot. Intense feeling was aroused against theHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. oe Mexicans. Santa Anna's army, flushed with victory, captured Harris- burg, the capital, and burned it, also New Washington. On April 10 Houston received two six-pound guns from Cincinnati. His forces now numbered 783 men; Santa Anna 1,600 veterans. Houston attacked him at San Jacinto March 21. He opened with grape and cannister then charged with the ery, “Remember the Alamo.” Houston had his ankle shattered by a ball and his horse mortally wounded, but urged him up te the works which were instantly scaled. The Texans having no bayonets used clubbed muskets, bowie knives and pistols. Few Mexicans escaped ; 630 were killed, 208 were wounded, and 730 were captured. The next day Santa Anna was captured in disguise. Houston exerted all his influence to stay the butchery of the Mexicans and saved Santa Anna. While prisoner Santa Anna acknowledged the independence of Texas and agreed to withdraw his forces therefrom. Houston resigned his posi- tion in favor of Gen. Rusk and went to New Orleans for treatment for his wounds. On his improvement he returned to his old home in Texas. A call was made in July for the election of a president of the repub- lic in September. Houston was selected to be a candidate, but with great reluctance consented. He was inaugurated October 22, 1836, and took his old competitors, Gen. Austin and Hon. Henry White, into the cabinet. He released Santa Anna and sent him to Washington to con- fer with President Jackson. He soon opened communication with the ‘Washington government with a view to the annexation of Texas. His administration was as brilliant as his military career. ‘The constitution prevented his re-election in 1838, when he was succeeded by M. B. Lamar. In 1841 he was again called to the presidency. In his inaugural address he said: “There is not a dollar in the treasury; we are in debt $10,- 000,000 or $15,000,000. We are without money, without credit, and for want of punctuality are without character.” On the annexation of Texas he was chosen one of the United States Senators from that State, and was elected again in 1853 to serve till March 4, 1859. He was defeated for re-election in 1858, but was chosen governor again in August, 1850. He opposed the Kansas-Nebraska bill in a great speech March 3, L854, and lamented the repeal of the Missouri compromise. He was a friend to the American or Know-nothing party. He favored the Lecompton constitution in the Kansas difficulties, and opposed secession at the out- break of the war. He resigned his office rather than subscribe to the oath presented by the convention. His death occurred at Huntersville, Tex., July 25, 1863. Personally Houston was a man of great courage, and was the soul of honor. While in Congress he made charges agalnst Sol. Irwin, postmaster at Nashville. These charges were resented by aSeeeeeesbeeee secebeetensene a Coe pasa ae ov ticertepn dhs alla Mt ai Ss 2 Saar airs: ji } wae (| bla ae: } ee Binh) th aed ‘ i i 7 Ai YY : : eee fi by WS tae ea ae Febba ey ees aay b uf Pea) Ger ah aoa n eps! > fe ¥ q it i} i i j f 1 } Ly ea if bet Hy eel Le eels) } Pi h i } | ee 1} | butt a Aled err ail i é hah Ae Comedia Hii pans hi ij H fe ve il +} VY \ , Y (Tends on i M is a. Ue i tj} ei Ri Sh, teen ay ai eed ieay cmee plat eee was oe oe are ee = a re paeinCas FET sonal o ae aor ree ae i 9: aE ~ Z ~ pero Pat: ete eee eee ie : eee aap cemnAbe ei olltg Ck a . Bers ign, Be Fen LT A RT sehen apupeciiniiancedeaalionmane ai OS ee ee ————— gre cama Soa cea So le oants Satan Seto spew Sipe ee ei seth am nt in ow Yen yet a — —————————————

128 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. challenge sent to Gen. Houston from Col. Irwin by the hand of Col. John Smith. of Missouri. This Houston refused to receive from Smith. The act of Houston was criticised by Gen. William White as being discour- teous to Col. Smith. A dispute arose which resulted in a challenge and duel. ‘Gen. White was severely but not fatally wounded. Col. David Crockett,* son of John Crockett, of Irish birth, was born at Limestone, on the Nollichucky River, in Washington County, Tenn., on August 17, 17806. After some youthful adventures, a little schooling and a third courtship, About 1808 he with his wife and two children moved to Lincoln County, Tenn., where in the two In 1810 or {811 he moved to Franklin County, and soon after the massacre at Fort His mother’s maiden name was Rebecca Hawkins. young Crockett married a beautiful Imish girl. following years he began to distinguish himself as a hunter. Mimms went as a volunteer to the Creek war, participating in most of the important battles until its close in 1815. Soon after the close of the war his wife died, leaving three children, and in a short time he married as his second wife the widow of a soldier, who had two children, and by whom he had three more. He subsequently removed to the country purchased of the Chickasaw Indians, in what is now Lawrence County, and became successively magistrate, colonel of militia, and member of the Legislature. Having lost his property, failed in business, and given up all to his creditors, he determined to go farther West, especially as game was becoming scare in the locality where he lived. Tn 1822 he removed to West Tennessee and settled in what is now Gibson County, but at that time Weakley County. “Here he engaged in his favorite sport, bear hunting, and thus supplied his family with an abundance of meat. He also secured a large quantity of peltry, which he exchanged for coffee, sugar, powder, lead and salt. He was now elected for a second term of the Legislature, serving during the years 1823-24, voting against Gen. Jackson for United States Senator. In 1825 he became a candidate for a seat in Congress against Col. Adam R. Alexander, then serving as the first representative to that body from West Tennessee. but was defeated by two votes. For the next two years he was engaged in the lumber trade and in bear hunting, killing in one season no less than 105 bears. But his speculation in the lumber He then became a candidate a second time for Congress and defeated Col. Alexander and Gen. William Arnold by a He acted with the ‘‘ Jackson party” during the administration of President Adams. but during his second term he voted trade was a total failure. majority of 2,748 votes. against the Indian bill, a favorite measure of President Jackson’s. In *From a manuscript in possession of the Tennessee Historical SocietyHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 729 1830 he was a candidate for a third term in Congress, but owing. to his opposition to the administration party he was defeated by his opponent William Fitzgerald. Two years later, however, despite the efforts of the partisans of the administration, he defeated Mr. Fitzgerald by a majority of 202. He co-operated with the Whig party forming the recharterine of the United States Bank, and opposing the removal of the deposits. In the spring of 1834 Col. Crockett made a trip through the Northern States, visiting Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York, Boston and other cities, and was everywhere received with marked attention, especially by the Whigs. He was presented in Philadelphia by the younger Whigs with a very fine rifled gun, a present he prized very highly, and which he subsequently bore with him in many a bear hunt, as well as during his campaigns in Texas. Retiring to Washington, where he remained until the close of Congress, he returned home, and was a candidate for re-election, Adam Huntsman being his opponent. Crockett was defeated, having not only Huntsman but the influence of Andrew Jackson and Gov. Carroll backed by the Union Bank at Jackson to contend against. Feeling that “Crockett’s occupation was gone” and being diseusted with the ways of scheming politicians, he determined to go to Texas. He made a parting address to his constituents, in which he reviewed his course in Congress and warned them against the policy of ‘‘the Govern- ment’? and the President’s disposition to nominate Mr. Van Buren as his successor. He also alluded to the unfair means used to defeat him in his late canvass, and closed by telling them that he was done with politics for the present, and that they might all go to h—l and. he would go to Texas. Taking leave of his wife and children, and shouldering his rifle “Betsy,” he started at once on the highway to ‘Texas, to a heroic death and to a fame as lasting as the memory of the bloody Alamo itself. He made his journey as rapidly as he could, and reached San Antonio in time to join the patriots before Santa Anna’s army, previous to the siege of the city. He was one of the six Americans who survived the assault upon the Alamo on March 6, 1836. The prisoners were taken before the Mexican chief, who gave orders for the massacre of the whole number. Col. Crockett, seeing their treachery, sprang like a tiger at his foes, when a number of swords were sheathed in his indomitable heart. His body, with others of the slain, was buried in a heap in the center of the Alamo. Thus ended the life of Col. David Crockett, the celebrated bear hunter of Tennessee, the eccentric congressman from the West and one of the heroes of the Alamo, whose fame is as immortal as history. On the 11th of September, 1777, was born Felix Grundy, the young-oe —_ nn ee rede eeeeeen oeee eee naeied an — —_ P< re FE ta ns A a ee eneniiiatecricimaiithatbine: mada Rec uae a Sle ES z cae 8 a n= eavemminaner omnia rae nmi ee ees ee ewer eet soa < ae eel Fae Toca eas ee cee : Peano ere Cae ea 5 Stages Le TTR SRE ae re OT komm 9 = - re ae Soy learn = pnt ponent SS = vel om =, Sse % aa no eg ; A RN e aie cael: - ey 7 pee aK A RR NEE IDC ane Tena RSE ERR rn ee Pak wee af avis Ht! "Poet t) : | ay if ua il Pear |! i 1 Wa CA A OB ii fey) it: nun } F } ‘a ly ‘ rely { £ | ae ea ac? tia Pearse 1A Rae ti na aoe aa ‘ 14 Lit RRR} \ a AG a i PP ERAGE || ( iW ij tte . ie H a UA i 1 I ; a - Sie, cae Se 0S poy eae Emde a ae = = a — a . eee igs at eons mee = # SN Se SE tel HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Hugh Lawson White was the son of Gen. James White, one of the earliest pioneers of East Tennessee, and in many respects a remarkable man. Gen. White was born of Irish parentage, and spent the early part of his life in North Carolina, where in 1770 he married Mary Lawson. During the Revolutionary war he served as a soldier from that State, but at its close removed with his family to Fort Chissel, Va. In 1787 he immigrated to Knox County, Tenn., and in 1792 laid the foundation of the present city of Knoxville. He was a member of the Franklin con- vention in 1785; of the Territorial Assembly in 1794, and the Constitu- tional Convention of 1796. During the Creek war, although advanced in years, he served with distincton as brigadier-general of militia. Taken all in all he is one of the most conspicuous figures in the early history of East Tennessee. Hugh Lawson White was born October 30, 1773, and was conse- quently a lad of fourteen when with his father he came into Tennessee. His early life was spent in hardy toil, with very limited facilities for ob- taining even the rudiments of an education. Attheage of fifteen, however. by earnest effort, he had sufficiently advanced to take up the study of the ancient languages, which he did under the direction of Rey. Samuel Carrick, with some assistance from Judge Roane. His studies were soon in- terrupted by Indian hostilities, and he volunteered as a soldier under the leadership of John Sevier. In this campaign he distinguished himself, not only for bravery, but for strength and endurance. At the age of twenty he was appointed private secretary to Goy. Blount, with whom he remained until the close of his term of office. He then went to Phila- delphia where he took a course of study, after which he engaged in the study of law with James Hopkins of Lancaster, Penn. In 1796 he re- turned to Knoxville, and at once assumed a leading position at the bar. Five years later, at the age of twenty-eight, he was elected judge of the su- perior court, then the highest judicial tribunal inthe State. He resigned in 1807, and was elected to the State Senate. He was re-elected two years later, but did not serve the second term, as he was elected by the Legislature one of the judges of the supreme court. He continued in that capacity until December 31, 1814, when he again resigned. He had been elected president of the Bank of Tennessee in November, 1812, and from that time until July, 1827, he continued to direct the operations of that institution. In 1820, his health being impaired, he returned to his farm, but the country had need of his services, and he was not al- lowed to remain in seclusion. The next year he was appointed by Presi- dent Monroe one of the three commissioners to settle the claims under the treaty providing for the transfer of Florida from Spain to the UnitedJOHN BELLj i ; 4 | | A i | ea - - Mike TR ea TT Fe Ne ps

a zine ener —_- Ree TOT srraaNe ee aa 7d —— ee 7 [a < ry en ara : sat | r \ i = ah = ee At : i a EARS EI Deane Bom iF agra RT a “a a mange —< — = ae SES one: ire : eee an = me CS = es = aS SENT aie i 2 OS an : ee re rs ~ = SR A SINT ee NT RTE i FE GATT Tat RS SL SNE II ed AEDs i wi hae | 1) ui, ND - it 5 ty! 1s a | j a) We us 4} PEE at ; i ‘ 1a) : itt ar! | i) Lean Le ; ow Pes j ies ; Ahilenee ah \ NP eat eae 1m) ae a Nyt 4 i WMC aeca iat Hi Re ea bee ae TT at ie me iia eae i i | =) i f i 1? ae ree ; ni ne ih Paa) let ae 1 ee 4 ee a4 Bie ae \ it He aT: i Me go) eae yee th et are EL be ey ai) | Pi Ha eT Pea Meant || Va ¢ + en i hi! } h i fs Ce ed we te al : Beira cue) | ta dy ii Peet hae ae i Pain| ; He ae | hy li ny i li Hl + it a a ben 10) beet | iM Wea it been ih 7 HI . Hit i) ae ap A ie eh oa) | Hi Ht HI ew vi ban ii VERS] eat he ari eee NA HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. or subject to her laws. It is a practice inconsistent with the liberties of a free State, and never before submitted to.” John Sevier was succeeded this year in the gubernatorial office by Archibald Roane, who served two years, and William C. C. Claiborne was re-elected to Congress; but having been appointed by the President of the United States governor of Mississippi Territory, he chose to ac- cept the latter office. In 1803 John Sevier was again elected governor of the State, and served six more years in that capacity, when, in 1809, he was succeeded by Willie Blount, and himself taking his seat in the Gen- eral Assembly as senator from Knox County. During the second occupancy of the office (in 1807), the relations between the Governments of Great Britain and the United States became unusually strained. The affair of the ‘‘Chesapeake,” which occured on June 22. in which the British man-of-war “Leopard,” fired on the “Chesapeake,” from her four seamen claimed as British subjects, and the failure of subsequent negotiations to effect a settlement of the difficulties between the two nations, produced a bitterness of feeling on the part of Mr. Jefferson and his adherents on the one hand, and the British minis- try on the other, which could only, and which finally did, result in war. Mr. Jefferson had been Tennessee’s choice for President, both in 1800 and 1804, and she now sympathized fully with the National Government in its struggle tomaintain “sailors’ rights.” During this year the Legis- lature sent a communication to the President of the United States, ex- pressive of this sympathy and encouragement in the prosecution of the arduous duties of his position. On the 9d of December, the Governor informed the Legislature that, in case the Government of the United States should call for militia from Tennessee, which it afterward did, the State did not possess one pound of powder and ball for public use nor a single musket for public defense, which was immediately referred to a and took committee for action. On the 7th of September, 1812, the Legislature convened in extra session and received a long message from Goy. Willie Blount regarding the war with Great Britain, which had recently been declared by the Congress of the United States. Of the 100,000 militia called out by the President, 2,500 was the quota from Tennessee. On the 9th of October, the Legislature passed a series of resolutions approving of the declara- tion of war against Great Britain as an act of indispensible necessity to the sovereignty, welfare, happiness and safety of the government and people of the United States, and they also resolved, “ that we view any and every attempt to divide the good people of the United States, whether by a foreign government, by the State governments, respectively, or by |HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 1Dd3 any of those styling themselves citizens of any of the States, as an act, in the first place, too mean, degrading and barbarous, even to have been countenanced by any other civilized government than that of our present enemy. - When the Legislature convened September 18, 1815, peace had re- turned to the United States, and Gov. Willie Blount congratulated the members on the advantages of a republican form of government in times of war as well as in times of peace, and said “such a government is worthy the best support of freemen.” During this year Goy. Blount was succeeded by Joseph McMinn, who had served for several years as speaker of the State Senate. On October 10, 1815, George W. Camp- bell was elected United States Senator for six years, and John Williams for two years. Mr. Campbell served two years, when he resigned to accept the mission to St. Petersburg, to succeed William Pinkney, and John H. Eaton was appointed to Mr. Campbell’s place in the Senate. One of the subjects which engaged the attention of the Legislature was the depressed state of the industries of the country. After the set- tlement of the disputes with Great Britain, and before the disputes at home on the slavery question, this subject was likewise uppermost in the minds of the people, because painfully felt by all. The press teemed with articles defining the causes and prescribing the remedies. Opinions as to the duties of the State and of the people in the emergency were yarious, and sometimes antagonistic, even among the ablest citizens of the State. Among the causes enumerated were these: The embarrassed state of things in Hurope; immense importation ot foreign commodities ; oyertrading at home; neglect of domestic manufactures; general extray- agance in living among the people; general indisposition among the peo- ple to apply themselves industriously to regular business; an attempt to grow rich without labor, and the withdrawal of foreign bank bills. Among other remedies for the embarrassments felt by the people in Tennessee, Gov. McMinn suggested an extention of time for paying debts, the formation of a property law. and the issue of treasury notes, based on the sale of the Hiwassee lands and the public faith, the treas- ury notes to be brought into circulation by means of a loan office. In accordance with the suggestion of the Governor, the Legislature pro- posed the enactment of an elaborate loan-office bill, by which two prin- cipal offices, with a capital of $750,000 were to be established, one at Nashville and the other at Knoxville, the later being authorized to es- tablish eight branch offices, the former “at least five.’ By means of these main and branch offices all portions of the State would be supplied with a circulating medium, every citizen needing money to be furnisheden a tee meek Ge Saree > ae oy Ls I eT = cee eo «nie! PRE a _ ne I SOT LO a Bb Rigg: alg a npatngah htailn meiner abel epenmapeomieiee oil a goes - lal? . _— = = Sen cin Te - Es , + _ . ; A en ce eee a chee scnclamnanaes asin ook —- a 756 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. plishments are yet to be seen throughout the length and breadth of the State. But how fared it with the colored race? Their bonds had been riveted tighter by legislative enactments and social usages, and eyery vestige of obstruction in the way of absolute serfdom had crumbled, or was crumbling in pieces. Education was denied them, as if made them independent and restless under restraint. Religion was awarded them. as it made them truthful, moral and subdued. ‘The effect upon the slaves of the presence of free negroes was prejudicial; and various ex- pedients were proposed, either to counteract such influence or to remove free colored people from the State. At length the Legislature passed the following enactment: Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, That it shall not be lawful for any free person or persons of color, whether he, she or they be born free or emancipated agreeably to the laws in force and use, either now or at any other time in any State within the United States, or elsewhere, to remove him, her or themselves to this State to reside therein, and remain therein twenty days; andif any such free person or persons of color shall presume or attempt to reside therein, contrary to the provisions of this act, every such person or persons of color shall be liable to be indicted before the grand jury of the county, or circuit court of the county, where he, she or they may attempt to reside, and if convicted,shall be fined ina sum not less than ten dollars nor more than fifty dollars, to the use of the county,and shall, moreover, be sentenced to hard labor in the penitentiary for a term not less than one year nor more than two years, the term of service to be fixed by the judge; and if any such free person or persons of color as aforesaid, shall fail or refuse to remove him, her or themselves from this State, within thirty days after his, her or their discharge from the penitentiary, unless detained by sickness or some unavoidable accident, such person or persons shall again be liable to indictment as before, and upon con- viction shall be sentenced to labor in the penitentiary for a term double the longest term before mentioned, but shall not be liable to any pecuniary fine, as in the first instance 1s provided. Sec. 2. Beit enacted, That it shall not be lawful, from and after the passage of this act, for any court or any owner or owners of any slave or slaves to emancipate any slave or slaves, except on the express condition that such slave or slaves shall be immediately removed from this State, and every persop or persons so desiring to emancipate any slave or slaves shall, before such emancipation be allowed, enter into bond with good and suf- ficient security in a sum equal to the value of such slave or slaves so to be emancipated, conditioned that said slave or slaves shall forthwith remove from this State, which said condition shall be a part of the judgment of such court. Src. 8. Beit enacted, That it shall be the duty of each of the judges of the circuit courts in this State, to give this act in charge to the grand juries at each and every term of the courts respectively; and it shall be the duty of the several attorneys-general to re- quire information upon oath, from all sheriffs, coroners, constables and any other person or persons they may think proper to call on, so as to enable him or them to prosecute all offenses under this act, whose fees on conviction shall be the same as in cases of felony now allowed by law. December 16, 1831. The first serious anti-slavery demonstrations were made within the State during the decade of the thirties. Organized societies in the North had for several years distributed anti-slavery books and pamphlets in Ten-HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Wow nessee and other slave-holding States, for the purpose of fanning the fires of abolition. Able representatives of the abolition societies had been sent to the Southern States to teach and preach universal emancipation and to distribute where they would have the greatest effect illustrated publica- tions showing the more deplorable results of the institution of slavery. They were everywhere met with the bitterest opposition. On the 8th of August, 1835, Rey. Amos Dresser was arrested at Nashville for haying in his possession publications calculated to incite an insurrection of the slaves. When the facts became known great excitement prevailed. A “Committee of Vigilance and Safety,” consisting of sixty-two residents of Nashville, appointed to try him, found him guilty of the following specifications : 1. Of being an active and efficient member of the Aboli- tion Society of Ohio. 2. That he had in his possession, in Nashville, sun- dry pamphlets of a most violent and pernicious tendency, and which, if generally disseminated, would in all human probability cause an insurrec- tion or rebellion among the slaves. 3. That he published and exposed to public view the said pamphlets in Nashville and Sumner County. After what was considered an impartial trial, he was adjudged guilty by the committee, sentenced to the punishment of twenty stripes upon his bare back, and ordered to leave Nashville within twenty-four hours. This sentence was promptly carried into execution. Just before this event serious disturbances had occurred in Mississippi and other Southern tates from the same cause. An uprising of the slaves in Tennessee was apprehended at this period, and extra precautions were taken to pre- vent it. The “Committee of Vigilance and Safety” at Nashville was authorized to adopt measures to hold the blacks in subjection. As a consequence of the anti-slavery movements, public meetings were held throughout the State to denounce the course of the abolition- ists and to nullify their proceedings. On the 30th of August, 1835, at Nashville, a public meeting of the “‘ Committee of Vigilance and Safety a ras held, John Shelby serving as chairman. The following boycotting resolutions (similar ones being adopted in many other parts of the State ) were adopted : WHEREAS, It is believed by this committee that funds to a large amount have been con- tributed by Arthur Tappan and other fanatics of New York, for the purpose of disseminat- ing through the Southern and Western States incendiary pamphlets, inciting the slaves to revolt; and it is known that many of our merchants are in the habit of purchasing goods of said Tappan (merchant of New York) thereby increasing his power to injure us; There- fore, Resolved, That we recommend to the merchants of this city and of the State of Tennessee to make no purchases of said Tappan; also Resolved, That we advise our citizens to abstain from dealing with any merchant who is known to make any purchase from siid Tappan or any other abolitionist alter this date.ae Se RE TEI en RS AS Ts = eer SENT aM ¥ eat aopew er nails : ee RS ergine + Canes _ Ss eneey : ae ep: ogee : mee a aga — S weenie 2 RN Tee Tee nwt in Sen _ ener eH Pe = Cas Skee Pi rere reies a oe = SS ae . : a ait = “a = eo SSS 7 er a one a ela oe ee alee aes E 7 od ee —— eee ee eat eee in “ i “ : —S SS = . - a " nbetiaies aie ge a a cee mm aan see ala ere tens Scare crene Saar area eee : arene qth caer ee ama roast ee, oie Tre hea. -- - Sr eet —— nna as a. =a OS tes esta orien tes a a Mae EP RR ET ETC PS a RN Z(ttoy HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Resolved, That the merchants of Nashville and the State of Tennessee be requested to hold meetings and express their views upon the subject of trading or dealing with Arthur Tappan & Co. or with any other abolitionist. So vigorous and so prompt was the action taken by the slave-holders that abolition agitators were obliged precipitately to leave the State. From this time until the war of 1861—65 the breach between the North and South continued to grow wider and deeper. The abolitionists con- tinued their work, sending broadcast over the South, so far as they could escape the vigilance of slave-holders, active representatives and sundry publications calculated to encourage partial or general emancipation. To a large extent this was accomplished despite the watchfulness and op- posing energy of the slave-holders. Slight insurrections of the slaves under these teachings were promptly and effectually checked. Abolition- ists were persecuted and driven from the State. Hundreds of runaway slaves were assisted by Northern societies and individuals on their way to Canada. The underground railroad became an historic organization. Finally the fugitive slave law was passed, but it afforded little relief to slave-holders. The repeal of the Missouri Compromise, the Dred Scott decision, the Kansas-Nebraska bill, the Kansas war, John Brown’s in- surrection, the multiplication of Northern abolition societies, and the fiery debates in Congress kindled everywhere, both North and South, extreme bitterness and widened to an impassable degree the gulf dividing the two factions of the Government. During the session of the Legislature of 1859-60 the “ Free Negro Bill” was introduced. It provided that all free negroes, except certain minors, who should remain in Tennessee after the 1st of May, 1861, should be sold into slavery. It was admitted that free negroes were en- titled to the following vested rights: 1. Freedom from any master. 2. Could hold property. Vested rights, it was stated, did not extend to such free colored persons as had assumed a residence within the State after the passage of the act of 1831, as such residence was obtained in violation of law; ‘their rights were natural only. It was argued that free colored persons who had assumed a residence before 1831 had vested rights under the laws but not under the State constitution ; and that the Legislature might repeal such laws and thus annul their vested rights. On the contrary it was maintained that, as the Constitution permitted no retrospective law voiding or impairing the sacredness of contracts, free colored persons who had secured vested rights, such as to hold property, etc., could not be molested; and that, owing to their natural rights, such persons as had assumed a residence within the State after the passage of the law of 1831 and who had thus no ves- ted rights, as they had settled in violation of law, could not be ejectedHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. (a9 from the State by the Legislature. The Supreme Court had decided in the case of The State vs. Claiborne that the word “freeman” meant “ cit- izen,” and that as a negro could not be a citizen he could not be a free- man. But this, it was rightly urged, referred to the political rights of free colored people and not to their natural rights, such people occupying much the same relation to the State that aliens did. The leading argu- ment against the bill was its unconstitutionality. The debate was closed early in January, 1860, Messrs Kast, Ewing, Neill S. Brown, Williams, Bennett, Meigs, Keeble, ef. al. speaking against the bill, several of their speeches being published verbatim et literatim in the daily papers. It failed to become a law. About the time of Goy. Carroll’s first election, a committee, appointed by the Legislature for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the condition of the banks, and what legislation, if any, was required, re- ported that nothing was necessary to be done. The banks were much more solvent than was generally supposed. ‘This was especially the case with the Knoxville and Nashville banks, the former of which would have to call in but 16 per cent and the latter 29 per cent of its loans, to en- able them to discharge all their indebtedness. The question then nat- urally arose, why were their notes so greatly depreciated? The commit- tee, of which A. V. Brown was chairman, thought it was owing to ignor- ance on the part of the people as to the true financial condition of the banks, and to the intrigue and management of brokers in some of the principal towns of the State, but especially to the excessive importation of foreign fabrics to the neglect of domestic manufactures. During the early portion of the history of the State, and especially after the close of the war with Great Britain, opposition to the importation of foreign fab- rics was general and intense, and the sentiment was very strong in favor of domestic manufactures. Numerous laws are on the statute books, favoring the establishment of iron works, salt works, paper-mills, ete. ; and Gov. Carroll’s messages were never weary of impressing 1t upon the minds of the people that habits of industry and economy, and special attention to agriculture and domestic manufactures, were of infinitely more value to them than stay and repleyin laws and the issue of irre- deemable paper currency—the latter being in fact positive evils, while the former were positive benefits. But the question of encouragement to domestic mantfactures by means of a protective tariff appears not to have received much attention from political parties I this State previous to 1824. In that ycar the revision of the tariff, and the augmentation of the duties under it, was one of the principal subjects before Congress, and turned not so much upon the emptiness of the treasury as upon the aie | | te ra 4 A aa ee heeae ree omy name pacer ape ornare ea act eee aid es Wits maar app eeeess oe th Na a toa - ome ia AE etre See mt ha et 5 MNT ESS Se a ile! SiG ei ng Seg Se eS seneree poe * rte at Sp Sie ile ee ee ‘ = ghee: neti eK tA Read nh ae finn eile aig eee phate eae i aca lep peciprmep Ce BSR RETA Rp Ticats ened SaePE om eR ST Ee ihn nc inca —ns aa IN SO PG i ALR ess oe lnc erceee ot var) or aera TE RE ITE LTTE ILO LO LT EL ALTE RET Oe ~ ~ a . ue ws ee nes 5 eR s see y ' Ane Ly see -- re iach To = ef ~ ‘ henge eseey eee en ee T e ee ey pe pan was bs as ee tae ees = t = - 7 eo pore ee = aot yas Sekesies e = LT TS i ee i E > ~ ee . ea op eee “grimy “ : : Soa ee Thy pia aa ieee) Sa ene a io ers 3 - 2 = pg eat - a LS 5 = ae ~ 760 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. distress of the country. By this time prosperity had returned to the State, or was visibly returning, and possibly for this reason, as well as from principle, Tennessee's representatives, Blair, Isaaks and Reynolds arrayed themselves on the side of Mr. Webster in favor of free-trade, Four years later, when the woolen bill, subsequently enlarged into a general tariff bill, came up and marked an era in American legislation, a very large majority of Southern members of Congress, including the en- tire delegation (nine) from Tennessee, were found to oppose its passage. Yet notwithstanding the predilections of the people of his adopted State in favor of free-trade, Gen. Jackson himself, in his message after he became President, as had all of his Republican predecessors in that office, favored protection. In 1822 his friends who desired his elevation to that great office began a movement which in 1823 resulted in his elec- tion to the United States Senate, and they also procured for him from the General Assembly of the State a nomination to the presidency, which would give him, it was believed, more prestige before the country than he could otherwise obtain, for the people generally had no very high opinion of his qualifications for civil administration. With reference to this nomination Mr. Tucker says: ‘“‘ At first this nomination afforded matter for jest and merriment rather than for serious animadversion in other States; since, unquestionable as were Gen. Jackson’s military qualifica- tions, he was not thought to possess the information, the respect for civil authority, nor the temper deemed requisite in the office of President, and very few believed that the favor which his military successes had pro- duced for him in his own State would find much support for him in other parts of the Union.” The General was nominated, however, in 1824. and received 99 electoral votes to 84 for John Quincy Adams, 41 for William H. Crawford, and 37 for Henry Clay. But as he failed to receive a majority of the electoral votes, there was no choice of Presi- dent by the people, and the election was carried into the House of Rep- resentatives, where, through the influence of Henry Clay, John Quincy Adams was elected President, and Mr. Clay made Secretary of State. This appointment by President Adams led to charges by Gen. Jackson’s friends against him and Mr. Clay of a bargain with reference to these two high positions, which charges every well informed person now knows But the General’s defeat only served to stimulate his friends to renewed and greater efforts in his behalf. The question was again taken up by the Tennessee Legislature as early as October 6, 1825, on which day the House of. Representatives, after a to have been without foundation. long preamble expressive of confidence and admiration for Gen. Jackson, passed a resolution already passed by the Senate, nominating him theirHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 761 next candidate for the presidency. The resolution was carried thirty- seven to one, the one being Lewis Reneau, who objected to the action of the Legislature as impolitic and in bad taste, inasmuch as the election was nearly four years hence. Upon hearing of this nomination Gen. Jackson immediately resigned his seat in the United States Senate, thinking it due to himself to practice upon the maxims he had recom- mended to others, and hence felt constrained to retire from a position whence imputation might exist and suspicions arise in relation to the exercise of an influence tending to his own aggrandisement. Hugh L. White was elected October 23, 1825, to succeed Andrew Jackson in the Senate, and Gen. Jackson becoming a candidate for the presidency in 1828 was triumphantly elected to that office, receiving 178 electoral votes to 83 for Mr. Adams. In his first inaugural message President Jackson said: ‘‘ With re- gard to a proper selection of subjects of impost with a view to revenue, it would seem to me that the spirit of equity and compromise in which the constitution was formed, requires that the great interests of agriculture, commerce and manufactures should be equally favored, and that per- haps the only exception to this rule should consist of the peculiar en- couragement of any products of either of them that may be found essen- tial to our National independence.” Gen. William Carroll served continuously as governor from 1821 un- til 1827, in which latter year he was succeeded by Gen. Samuel Houston, who was inaugurated in the Baptist Church in Nashville, October 1. Goy. Houston’s administration appears to have been distinguished by nothing more extraordinary than its termination. The Governor was married January 22, 1829, to Miss Eliza H. Allen, daughter of John Allen, of Sumner County, and shortly afterward discovered, or thought he discovered, that she was wanting in that affection which a wife should have toward her husband. His mind was haunted also by the suspicion that she was not a pure and chaste woman. Mrs. Houston was informed by her husband of the thoughts that were in his mind, and which de- stroyed his happiness, the natural result being a serious difficulty be- tween them; and, notwithstanding that the Governor’s suspicions were soon dispelled and his opinions changed, that he gave her and her father his assurance of his acceptance of her as a virtuous and chaste wife, and that he would defend her character against all assailants with his life if need be, yet the poison of suspicion had inflicted its wound, and no recon- ciliation could be affected. Gen. Houston, for this, and perhaps for other reasons, resigned the office of governor of ‘Tennessee ‘nto the hands of William Hall, speakerle ee woe Ea erent — cee. i A Ce — ad - his agp £ i = rr a Tan ot pe marion paren ny mane LT tit ane ee wa eee ae = on Pr are mererns Phage 2 mae = Se ennai gant — _ © ame in aes a iu i yee eran nee weer Otc EL ca Anenana rai Pe EE nn f ~— peaninen endl: Pes nai An > Eas an ae apie - mar os = er: ena a a ‘4 oy a ga Pave Nes AE ARCH = ae ian eg iia pea —_—- Capea Psion ain Sn ee ae i wr z oP ~~ Zi 2 sername Gey Sep tie ae nm ipo Bin INT, in, arenes ae oe ee ee Ei ly agit Laan Te : eke ee eee ai Sa mine apa | ey ri w ae { ae ‘ ya \ A a aed \ea) oa’ * ; Le qk # i} t Pe a ead Li a t ‘ Ue ij aaa! : Es gamed Bhi a ee aU hea a ' die fon. Nes \' Bis iienh g i de Hy | ' ue ie | i ' a ES Gay et yas ei fh a ti j mM) i ' it t a} VW ut ey ei Tl bee Mt ee fae it i Aa ei, \ i ut | ra i Bie | i i {i oy . i vin ea oie iia oH Dany iaray 4! i aad 1$ ih ' rad eres te eee)" ea ieee eae as Haast Wa Ai) eat | i Ae Hs eB i WER | 762 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. of the Senate. Gen. Houston in his letter of resignation said: ‘“ In dis- solving the political connection which has so long, and in such a variety of forms, existed between the people of Tennessee and myself, no private afflictions, however deep or incurable, can forbid an expression of the grateful recollections so eminently due to the kind partialities of an in. tellizent public. * * * That veneration for public opinion by which I have measured every act of my official life, has taught me to hold no delegated trust which would not daily be renewed by my constituents, could the choice be daily submitted to a sensible expression of their will; and although shielded by a perfect consciousness of undiminished claim to the confidence and support of my fellow-citizens, yet delicately cir- cumstanced as I am, and by my own misfortunes, more than by fault or contrivance of any one, overwhelmed by sudden calamity, it is certainly due to myself and my respect to the world that I should retire from a position which, in the public judgment, I might seem to hold by question- able authority.” Gov. William Hall served out the unexpired term of Goy. Houston, when he was succeeded by William Carroll, who was again governor for six years by successive re-elections. During these three terms of Goy- Carroll occurred events second in importance to none that occurred in the history of this country previous to the civil war. During the years 1831 and 1832, there was great excitement throughout the country, and especially in Tennessee, over the nomination of the President for a second term. When the time came for nominating a candidate Jackson was re-nominated, and when the time for the election came he was triumph- antly re-elected by a majority of the popular and electoral votes surpris- ing even to the most sanguine of his friends—the people giving him 687,502 votes to 530,189 for Mr. Clay, and the Electoral College him 219 yotes to 49 for his opponent. The gravest question with which the Government of the United States had to deal previous to the secession of the Southern States in 1860-61, was that of nullification in South Carolina in 1832: Nullification was the ClVine result of the tariff law of 1828. which most of the Southern States thought unequal and unjust to them inmany respects, but which all, except South Carolina, were resolved to obey until it should be modified or repealed. South Carolina boldly proclaimed in her ‘Ordinance to Nullify Certain Acts of the Congress of the United States,” that certain laws imposing duties on imports were “unauthorized by the Constitution of the United States, and were null. void and no law, nor binding on this State. its offi- cers or citizens; and she further ordained “that it shall not be lawful for any of the constituted authorities. whether of this State or of the UnitedHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 763 States, to enforce the payment of duties imposed by said acts within the limits of this State.” President Jackson’s views on the constitutionality of the tariff laws, were diametrically opposed to those above expressed. ‘The following is + CL Ny : ; 4 o ; his language: ‘“The States have delegated their whole authority over im- ports to the General Government, without limitation or restriction, saving the very inconsiderable reservation relating to their inspection laws. This authority having thus entirely passed from the States, the right to exercise it for the purpose of protection does not exist in them, and con- sequently if it be not possessed by the General Government it must be extinct. Our political system would thus present the anomaly of a peo- ple stripped of a right to foster their own industries and to counteract the most selfish and destructive policy which might be adopted by foreign oO nations. This surely can not be the case. This indispensable power, thus surrendered by the States, must be, within the scope of the authority on this subject, expressly delegated to Congress. ‘While the chief object of duties should be revenue, they may be so adjusted as to encourage manufactures. In this adjustment, however, it is the duty of the Government to be guided by the general good. Objects of national importance ought to be protected. Of these, the productions of our soil, our mines, and our workshops, essential to our national de- fense, occupy the first ranks. Whatever other species of domestic indus- try, having the importance to which I have referred, may be enabled, after temporary protection, to compete with foreign labor on equal terms, merit the same attention in a subordinate degree.” The State of Tennessee, through her Legislature, expressed her views and stated her position at considerable length, in the latter part of the rear 1832. on the three great questions then uppermost in the minds of ; = the people—the tariff, internal improvements, and nullification. Follow- ing is the series of resolutions submitted to the Senate October 20, 1832, by a majority of the joint select committee to which they had been re- ferred: Believing that a crisis has arrived which renders it important that Tennessee should declare to the world her opinion upon the subject of the relative power of the Federal and State Governments, this General Assembly, that no misapprehension may exist as to what are their political principles, do declare that they regard the resolutions adopted in the Legislature of Virginia in the year 1798, and the report of Mr. Madison thereon, as a true and safe exposition of the principles of the Federal constitution; yet, as the support: ers of nullification claim to be adherents of the same doctrines, it becomes the duty o1 this General Assembly distinctly to declare it as their opinion, that nullification is a heresy, the more dangerous as it professes to rest upon the basis of the doctrines of 1798. Therefore, Resolved by the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, That we regard the doc- trine that a State under the constitution, either by its Legislature or by a convention of . ‘7 ( rative § © d ‘ yrescs ry j » the people of the State, has the power to render inoperative a law ol Congress within therr PT A MEINE OS Te iE a apicgiamernes Fane na mt nae ¥ A Rpg capt Ow ae i ae, ene Fo, gd we eee tho laces. Ps = MDS: ere Ay ee a nape <= +e cE 2 aii ne tele IS SEAN mah. ae LENT ee lee —— Lele eam en oe monte tie alee Su aae . ~ eae Ai nhc an ag pf ego ncei = = " a : Sec eo ran atta pa ce Eg eR PL a oe oe a ys A aL SE a TES TS ee [ars ah Dieppe ae erro agin ne ee ny en ee ee ee ee Jaana ED = a a er M : a pana Se = EA ee ee ee a eee EI CIEL POO Oe a - eee SPSS Tel 764 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. limits of the State, as unwarranted by the Federal constitution and dangerous to the ex- istence of the Union. Resolved, That we regard nullification by either of these means as destructive of the principles of the government, and, under the guise of a peaceful and constitutional rem- edy, calculated to precipitate the country into civil war. Resolved That the doctrine, thatthe State has the right, under the constitution, to re- sist or render inoperative within her limits an act of Congress, whenever the same may be declared unconstitutional by a legislative, or, in its highest political attitude, a convention of the people of the State, is wholly unwarranted by the constitution, dangerous to the ex- istence of the Union, and inconsistent with the preservation of the Federal Government, and tending directly, under the guise of a peaceful remedy, to bring upon our country all the horrors of a civil war. With reference to the tariff. acts of Congress, while a minority of the people of Tennessee thought that the General Government had usurped the right of regulating by law the labor of a portion of the people, by imposing unequal and heavy burdens upon a portion of the States in the form of duties, not for the payment of the public debt, but in order to protect the manufactures of another portion of the States; yet the ma- jority, while they believed these tariff acts unequal, unjust and extremely oppressive, still considered them constitutional, and hence thought that no authority had been usurped by Congress in their passage. In the same year that these subjects were being discussed, the State was re-districted for members of Congress, the Legislature having been informed on the 3d of September, 1832, that Tennessee had become entitled to thirteen representatives in the lower house of the National Legislature. On the 14th of the samemonth an act was passed dividing oO o the State into fifteen districts for electors of President and Vice-Presi- dent of the United States, and providing that one elector, and no more, should reside in any one district, and that every voter should be entitled to vote for fifteen electors resident as aforesaid. About this time also Tennessee, in common with many other States of the Union, abolished a practice, which had become odious to public sentiment almost everywhere—namely, imprisonment for debt. The law was passed December 14, 1831. Following is the preamble, showing the estimate in which the old law was then held, and a portion of the act itself: WHEREAS, Liberty of person, like liberty of conscience, should not be restrained by unnecessary legal provisions, and as independence of thought and freedom of action are among the most inestimable of our political rights, it is alike unjust, inhuman and oppres- sive, that imprisonment for debt, which is a hateful remnant of ancient barbarism, should continue to disgrace our statute books, except in cases of fraud, and that it is repugnant to the moral sense of the community to imprison a woman for debt under any circum- stances, Therefore Be tt enacted, etc., That no female defendant in any civil action shall be imprisoned either by: virtue of mesne or final process, etc., and that at all civil actions at law to be commenced on any debt or contract made after the 1st of March next, in courts of recordHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 765 or before justices of the peace, the original process shall be a summons to the defendant to appear and answer to plaintiff’s action, upon which the defendant shall be notified, as is now practiced where bail is not required; nor shall special or appearance bail be re- quired. On January 24, 1840, it was enacted that even in cases of fraud the defendant should have the privilege of release from imprisonment upon habeas corpus, and when the plaintiff had sworn falsely the defendant was discharged from imprisonment altogether. Since then imprisonment for debt has been entirely swept from the statute books, and there remains no vestige of it in Tennessee. The gubernatorial election of 1835 was of a peculiar nature. It was the first election for governor under the new constitution. The candi- dates were Gov. Carroll, Newton Cannon and West H. Humphreys. Gov. Carroll had then served six consecutive years, and those opposed to him objected to his re-election on this ground, and also on the ground of his alleged ineligibility to re-election under the new constitution. He was also considered the Van Buren candidate, which, to some extent, militated against his success. His ineligibility was affirmed upon the strength of the language of Article III., Section 4, of the new constitution: The governor shall hold his office for two years, and until his successor shall be elect- ed and qualified. He shall not be eligible more than six years in any term of eight. The most weighty argument against him, however, in the popular mind, was the fact that he had already held the office during two periods, of six years each, or twelve years altogether, and to re-elect him under such circumstances would have been to violate all the precedents in the State’s previous history. Yet, notwithstanding that all these considera- tions served to defeat him, his popularity was so great that he received 30,247 of the popular vote, to 42,795 cast for Newton Cannon, and 8,433 for West H. Humphreys. Newton Cannon having been thus duly elect- ed, Goy. Carroll’s eligibility never came to a test. It will be remembered that in 1825 Hugh L. White was elected to the United States Senate, to fill a vacancy caused by the resignation of Gen. Jackson. In 1829 he was re-elected to the same position, and in the winter of 1832-33, upon the resignation of John C. Calhoun as pres- ident of the Senate, Mr. White was elected to preside over the delibera- tions of that august body, and in the performance of the duties of his of- fice was so just and impartial as to receive the commendations of Mr. Clay, a political opponent. In 1834 Mr. White commenced to be named as a possible successor to President Jackson in 1837, and in 1835 he was brought prominently forward as a candidate. Alabama, by a large ma- jority of her Legislature, nominated him for that office, and soon citizens’ * + . : ao s r r ac 1A, ana conventions in numerous counties and many newspapers 1n Lewes aneRe 2 Birt. Tg Een Se oi sane soem Al si are ot SR Cate — Lee ara oo cya 7 = Ss Tra = giadaa OER Se ocak Zi ai tee 2s ee ME ro ee a ~ _ Soares a Ai a ap =r ee me se SU ag Bees, or) 5 Mea et — — ‘ aes EE hater ome a esters —_ Mig: situ SEE T S Te a aerate eye gore gate ROMA Sarees - — as are kins or Se STS - acetis sail as : 2 i tay here acter ne ge NEMS TT oe SET, Me mae pare ery 4 na arate ee! = Sa Si eas eg in Bare ene Bee . Stee Seo cae re : a ——— som = naan . See. ig LTTE Tn SET Fre AS eager Ne STS . TR ae ae kant a Sane ——— Tea me RS Ore nop aa hep se orecpeiomectrsn reir aoa eat Se aes paar Soe ape eae ree Sigh maa ae LS Tens waa —= eIRT STOTT ee ARES tient a, wc Sa eS z SE RT TET IO i i a ger eS ee ee a aR . message, = Reel hk gL IT een = eee Ie es eget . Be iy % hen ae ne = es os ne ———— 2 — = ae ree er a BE Ae ane ee ‘ E oa - ae = = = = = == eae SET Eaee aes = aa — eee enceentoners Ss SS ge == HS —— ¥ = Se SS Se eno so ree Sie a Ee et ay — = — a —— ~ a ss . " - mp . xr = ae : Tae = oo Saks a il = oe - J - zi a . sa onl pa ia De Scenes 8 - rR ease cate NED ee er SEES a aaa sass nse ce oacseeseseti ston ots =ea es Soe : . — = ——— —— —— => —— ——— = -———— eee =e ——— 3 i —— ae es Du Se eee coer eae tee 7 eee ee 766 HISTORY OF ':ENNESSEE. nounced him as their choice. The newspapers stated that Judge White’s claims to the Presidency “would not be submitted to a packed jury, des- ignated by the name of a National Convention,” but to the impartial de- cision of a free people. Thomas H. Benton, in his ‘‘ Thirty Years’ View,” savs that Judge White’s candidacy was instigated by John C. Calhoun, in order to divide the Democratic party, and thus defeat Martin Van Buren. Mr. Van Buren, as was expected and foreseen, became the nom- inee of the Baltimore 9°65. and Richard M. Johnson was nominated for Vice-President, receiv- 1 of 15 votes unauthorizedly cast for Tennessee (which Convention, receiving the entire number of votes, ing, with the ai < State sent no delegs pened to be in Baltimore at that time, in the capacity of a private citi- zen. 178 votes, to 87 for W. C. Rives, just 1 vote more than the neces- In Tennessee the course of Mr. Rucker was regarded ites to the convention), by Edmund Rucker, who hap- sary two-thirds. as a remarkable episode. John Bell, one of the most able and distinguished men ever produced in this country, and the Hon. Bailie Peyton, were ardently devoted to Judge White, while Felix Grundy, James K. Polk, Cave Johnson, and J. N. Catron were in favor of Mr. Van Buren, as was also President Jackson himself, whose “‘ preference,” however, which was so much talked of at the time, did not prevent Judge White’s receiving the popular and electoral vote of Tennessee. The spirit of the movement in favor of Judge White 1s sufficiently shown in John Bell’s famous Vauxhall’s speech, delivered May 23,1835. A few words only from the peroration of this speech can be here introduced: I have already said that party is the only source whence destruction awaits our sys- tem. Jam so fully and solemnly impressed with this truth that were I asked what I con- sider the first great duty of an American statesman at this time, I would say guard against the excesses of party. If I were asked what I consider the second duty, I would say, guard against the excesses of party; and were I asked the third, I would still say, guard against the excesses of party. * * * When the spirit of party shall receive an organic existence, thus giving rise to a system within a system, not subordinate but superior to and designed to control the natural operation of the regular, lawful, and constitutional government of the country, when the sacred obligations of truth and justice are required to be yielded up a sacrifice to the unity of such a party, then I proclaim to you and to the world that the spirit of evil which is in the party is predominant. Those who would pre- serve the public liberty and our free institutions from pollution and overthrow must range themselves under a different standard. When party is the watchword and the ensign of those who fight for the spoils, the warning voice of patriotism says to every freeman, every white man, inscribe your country on your banner, and in hoc signo vinces. The campaign was conducted with vigor on both sides until the elec- > r+ tion in November, 1836, when it was found that Mr. Van Buren had re- ceived 170 electoral votes; Gen. Harrison, 73; Judge White, 26 (Ten- nessee’s 15 and Georgia’s 11); Daniel Webster, 14, and Willie PBHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 767 Mangum, South Carolina’s, 11. Tennessee’s choice for Vice-President was John Tyler. The popular vote received in Tennessee by Judge White was 35,962, while Van Buren received 26,120. The defeat ef Judge White for the presidency led him and his Supporters mainly to unite with the Whigs. They had become unalterably opposed to the leading meas- ures of the administration of President Jackson, and percetved as they thought the liberties of the people surely being absorbed by the executive of the nation. The policy of Mr. Van Buren being in the main but a con- tinuance of that of his predecessor, the Whigs were equally opposed to it. However, in the gubernatorial election of 1839, in which Gov. Newton Cannon was the Whig candidate, and James K. Polk the Democratie candidate, the latter gentleman was elected by a vote of 54,680 to 52,114 cast for Goy. Cannon, and thus the custom, so long followed, of honoring the governor with three successive terms, was departed from, and has not since been renewed. ‘The issues before the people for some years previ- ous to Mr. Polk’s election pertained almost wholly to the banks and to the currency. President Jackson had vetoed the bill re-chartering the United States Bank, and the country became dependent upon State banks. The panic of 1837 was attributed by the Whigs to the “experi- ments’ of the executive, as is shown by the following extract from Gov. Cannon’s message to the Legislature, October 4, 1837: It has fallen to our lot to taste the bitter fruits of an experiment upon the currency, which in the midst of the highest state of prosperity has brought upon us a strong revul- sion and total derangement of the monetary concerns of the country. How long and to what extent we may be doomed to suffer under this state of things must mainly depend upon the action of the General Government, by whose mistaken action and unwise policy this calamity has been inflicted upon us. The Whigs were generally in favor of the re-establishment of the United States Bank, and opposed to the State Bank system, while the Democrats were in favor of the State Bank and opposed to the United States Bank. Ephraim H. Foster and Hugh L. White were the two sena- tors in Congress, both of whom had been elected by the Whigs and were opposed to the policy of the administration in several important partic- ulars. In 1839 the Legislature of Tennessee had changed its complexion, a majority of the members being then Democratic. This Legislature, in the plentitude of its wisdom, deemed it proper to change the character of the United States Senate, so far as lay within its power, by instructing Messrs. Foster and White to pursue a course with regard to certain spe- cific measures different from that they would naturally pursue if permitted to be guided by their own judgment alone. The Legislature said they availed themselves of the power which legitimately, and in conformity with long established Republican usage throughout the Union, belonged ) 4 i - ate We e co / ~—~ eo eee So i ages = nate IE aT Oe 2 > Salah ai iS . t " et " cmanaapaile = ame 2 teary, acento se enema ~~ a ee — A et Sars en oa eee eee re Es gic cit nc Py SS ST a nmaneee ai a ede a Saige ETE TMT 2 rr ge pe See iy am ae piece, = - an aia dl TS Gare «ton acetate Sig al oR aati = antennas : : oe 7 ete ~ game wc, = sess 2a I na i SR A alk el TS IR oe in Zr ? ee A ene = ane Ae SAS a eT Se re mn Be ne 768 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. to them of instructing their senators and requesting their representatives in Congress to carry out their declared wishes: and Wuereas, The extraordinary circumstances which have existed for the last few years ‘in the financial and commercial interests of the United States, remain unabated, and under eauses of increased excitement and difficulty originating as we believe in the same vast source of public mischief; and WHEREAS, We do solemnly believe tl in a great degree to be attributed the oppr and through which we are now actually passing, etc., etc. Resolved, That our Senators in Congress be instructed, and our Representatives he chartering by Congress of a national bank; fair and proper exertions to procure the passage of the 1at to that source, the late United States Bank, 1s essive calamities under which we have suffered, Therefore, be it requested to vote against t To vote for and to use all sub-treasury bill, or independent treasury bill; To vote against Mr. Crittenden’s or any similar bill to secure the freedom of elections; 4 To vote against the distribution among the States of the sales of the public lands; To vote for a,bill repealing the duties on imported salt; and To heartily support the leading measures and policy and administrations of Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren. These were named and are known as the “ Instructing Resolutions,” and were passed by the Senate November 8, 1839, and by the House of Representatives November 14. On the 15th Mr. Foster, in an exceedingly able letter, covering all the points of the instructing resoltitions, resigned his seat in the Senate of the United States. Felix Grundy was elected to fill the vacancy, and resigned, not being constitutionally eligible at the time of this election, but was re-elected December 14, 1859) Mie Grundy died December 19, 1840, and was succeeded in the Senate by A. O. P. Nicholson, appointed by Gov. Polk. Senator White, like Senator Foster, unable conscientiously to obey the instructions contained in the resolutions, resigned his seat in the Sonate in a letter dated January 11, 1840. His letter was shorter, more pointed, but perhaps not less able than that of Mr. Foster. It contained this remarkable passage: After your resolutions shall have performed their wonted office and my resignation shall have been received, before electing my successor, I hope in your wisdom you will either rescind or expunge the sixth resolution. Our common constituents, the free and chivalrous citizens of Tennessee, I hope will ever be represented in the Senate by those whose principles and feelings are in accordance with their own; and while this resolution is suffered to remain, no man can accept that high station but one who is himself en- slaved, and fit only to represent those in the like condition with himself. With reference to this same sixth resolution Mr. Foster, in his letter of resignation, had said: ‘‘I would as soon be the servant of the Presi- dent as his senator.” Thus did those two distinguished men emphatically protest against the “long-established Republican usage throughout the Union” of instructing senators in. Congress. Alexander Anderson, of Knox County, was elected to succeed Hugh L. White in the Senate of the United States for the unexpired term. RT Oe RNHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 769 Considerable difficulty was experienced in electing senators to regu- larly succeed Mr. Foster and Judge White. The State was very nearly equally divided in sentiment between the two great political parties— Democratic and Whig. Mr. Polk had been elected governor of the State in 1839 by only 2,500 majority in a total vote of 106,834, and in 1841 James C. Jones, the Whig candidate, was elected by a majority of 3,243 over Gov. Polk, in a total vote of 103,929; though in the meantime, in November, 1840, Gen. Harrison, the Whig candidate for the Presidency, had received in Tennessee a majority of 12,102 in a total vote of 108,680. This Presidential election was perhaps as nearly devoid of issues as any that has occurred since the formation of the Government, the principal ones being the re-establishment of the United States bank and the turn- ing out of office of the appointees of Jackson and Van Buren. After the success of Gen. Harrison was assured, the Whig papers, as might have been expected, announced that the victory was a triumph, not only of party, but the firm and conclusive assertion of moral right and sound policy over Executive misrule. In 1841 the equally balanced condition of the two parties was further shown by the election of members to the Legislature, there being chosen to the Senate 12 Whigs and 13 Democrats, and to the House of KRepre- sentatives, 39 Whigs and 36 Democrats, giving the Whigs a majority on joint ballot of only two. The Legislature convened October 4, and on the 22d Lewis Reneau introduced into the Senate a resolution that the Senate meet the House of Representatives in the Representative Hall on the first Monday of November, 1841, for the purpose of electing two senators, one to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Felix Grundy, and the other to succeed Judge White, whose term had expired on the previous 4th of March. ‘This resolution was laid on the table, and after numerous attempts to take it up and go into convention with the House, such attempts being uniformly defeated by the Democratic members, either by an adjournment or by a direct vote. On the 16th of November a message was received from the House urging upon the Senate the im- mediate necessity of filling the vacancies in the Senate of the United States, not only on the ground of the interests of the State, but also upon those of policy and constitutional obligation. It was observed in this message that each member of the Legislature had taken an oath to sup- port the Constitution of the United States, which instrument made it in- cumbent upon State Legislatures to fill-vacancies in the United States Senate, and that a failure to do so would be disorganizing and revolution- ary, and tend to the destruction of the Government of the United States, for if Tennessee had the right to refuse to elect Senators all the other "Sy nana | 1 i i sa u : At \ = re ie:Santen = a Bina aeeron: = fe ans eee REIS ake Hor roe pin ~ : 2 _ ence ses Saas — as eis a 770 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. States had the same right, and if all should exercise it at the same time there would be no United States Senate, and the result would be the dis- solution of the Federal compact. After the reading of this message, one of its preambles was so amend- ffect that it would promote and advance the public in- ed as to read in e E. H. Foster and Spencer Jarnagin out of office for the terest by keeping next four and six years, respectively, these two gentlemen being the Whig candidates for the vacant seats. ‘The amendment was strongly protested against as being indicative of contempt for the whole Whig party im the Legislature. It was evident from the first, if the two Houses should go into joint convention that two Whig senators would be elected, and this the Democratic members were determined to prevent by refusing to go ‘nto convention. It was their desire, in view of the nearly equal division in public sentiment in the State on the subject of national politics to ehoose one Democratic and one Whig senator, and they would be satis- fied with nothing less. This position they justified on the srounds that the thirteen Democratic senators represented 62,000 qualified voters, while the twelve Whig senators represented only 58,000 qualified voters ; that if the popular will of the counties of Humphreys and Benton were faith- fully represented the strength of both political parties would be equally balanced in any attempt to elect senators to Congress, by a joint vote of the two houses; that a change of four votes in one representative district, and of fifteen in another, would in each case have sent a Democrat in- stead of a Whig to the House of Representatives, and thus in either case have produced a tie, and they were determined to compel the Whig ma- jority in joint convention in case they should go into it, to grant them the benefits they could have commanded if a tie in the joint convention had been the result of the popular election. The attempt to elect two senators was finally abandoned by the convention, and the Legislature adjourned February 7, 1842. Mr. John Quincy Adams, of Massachusetts, about that time, presented to Congress a petition, praying for a dissolution of the Union, and the Whigs of Tennessee charged the thirteen Democratic Senators, who, by their obstructive tactics had prevented the election of United States Senators, with having taken an important step toward effecting the very result for which Mr. Adams’ petitioners had only prayed. The Legislature of 1841, besides failing to elect Senators to Con- gress, also failed to redistrict the State, as required to do by the consti- tution, into senatorial and representative districts. In order that these duties might be performed as soon as practicable, Gov. Jones convened the Legislature in extra session October 3, 1842. This LegislatureHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. weed: failed to elect United States Senators, but it did succeed in redistricting the State; and the Whigs being in the majority, controlled the construc- tion of the redistricting bill, which elicited vigorous protests from Democratic members of both Senate and House, as being unjust to the Democratic party of the State; a flagrant outrage upon popular rights; as overshadowing all gerrymandering that had ever been attempted in any State of the Union; as a violation of the eternal principles of justice and right; and as a sacrifice of the rights of citizenship upon the altar of party. But notwithstanding these charges of unfairness against the Whig members of the Legislature, Gov. Jones was elected in 1843 over ex- Goy. Polk by a majority of 3,833, and the Legislature became strongly Whig in both branches, the Senate having fourteen Whigs to eleven Democrats, and the House forty Whigs to thirty-five Democrats a Whig majority of eight on joint ballot, hence it was an easy matter for the Whigs to fill the two vacant seats in the United States Senate, with- out going into joint convention, the method they insisted upon in 1841, when that was the only method in which it was possible for them to suc- ceed. On the 17th of October, 1843, therefore, they proceeded to elect Ephraim H. Foster to succeed Felix Grundy, and Spencer Jarnagin to succeed Judge White; each of these successful candidates receiving four- teen votes in the Senate and forty in the House of Representatives—a strict party vote. In the Presidential election of 1844 the annexation of T'exas was the principal issue, and, hence, when Henry Clay, on the 17th of April of that year, expressed himself as opposed to annexation, the hopes of the Democrats of the State were greatly elevated, for they believed that no candidate could be elected President unless he favored annexation; and when on the 20th of the same month Mr. Van Buren announced himself as also opposed to annexation, his enemies in the Democratic party were greatly elated, for they then became certain that he could not become the nominee of the Democratic party. When the Whig convention met on the Ist of May, at Baltimore, it nominated Mr. Clay for the Presidency by acclamation, and on the 27th of the same month, in the same city, Mr. Van Buren’s chances were ruthlessly destroyed by the adoption of the two-thirds rule. There were 266 votes in the convention, of which, on the first ballot, Mr. Van Buren received 146, to 116 for all others. On the second ballot he received 127, and on the eighth ballot 104. On this ballot James K. Polk, who was openly and strongly in favor of annexa- tion, received his first support, forty-four votes, and on the ninth ballot he received 233 votes, and was nominated.% & 7 RO SOLE rt re canal ; eae sam co ee ; Dig. FN AI. Te eat Z = ee ere 2 ~ ee REM ne ee - - : ' - — ee ~ oe ge iieyenneoe we : ees a — as i ete ay, SacI Se a Se Ae Stag tl Soha A ae oe te suimgan Soe ane oe ~ SS ee ore ibe, HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The result of the election was that Mr. Polk received 170 electoral votes to 105 for Mr. Clay, New York, with her thirty-six electoral votes having been carried for Mr. Polk, by the aid of James G. Birney, the ab- olition candidate for the presidency. Tennessee, however, preferred to support Mr. Clay, and gave him 60,039 votes to 59,915 for Mr. Polk, thus giving to the Whig candidate her thirteen electoral votes* by the slen- der majority of 124, and thus was Mr. Polk the first presidential candi- date in the history of the country who was not supported by his own State. On March 4, 1845, the senatorial term of E. H. Foster expired, and on the 25th of October the Legislature elected Hopkins L. Turney as his successor. In August of that year Aaron V. Brown was elected goy- ernor of the State, receiving 58,269 votes to 56,646 cast for E. H. Fos- ter, and the Democratic party elected a majority of the Legislature. The Senate, however, was evenly divided, twelve Whigs and twelve Demo- crats, and an episode worthy of remembrance occurred in the election of speaker. ‘The Democrats nominated John A. Gardner for the position, but the Whigs were determined he should not be elected on account of his having been one of -the thirteen Democratic senators who, in 1841 and 1842, prevented the election of two Whig senators to Congress. After 133 ballots had been cast Mr. Gardner withdrew, and on the 138th ballot Harvey M. Watterson was elected. In 1847 Neill S. Brown was elected governor, receiving 61,469 votes to 60,454 cast for Goy. A. V. Brown, and on the 22d of November, on the 48th ballot, John Bell was elected United States senator to succeed Spencer Jarnagin. The presidential election of 1848 resulted in there being cast in Ten- nessee 64,705 votes for Gen. Zachary Taylor, and 58,419 for Gen. Lewis Cass, a Whig majority of 6,286. In 1849, however, the current of po- litical opinion had so far changed as to elect Gen. William Trousdale goy- ernor (Democratic) over Neill S. Brown (Whig), the former receiving 61,740 votes, the later 60,350, and the Legislature became a tie on joint ballot, the Senate being composed of 14 Whigs and 11 Democrats, while the House of Representatives contained 36 Whigs and 89 Democrats. In 1851 political sentiment turned again in favor of the Whigs, who elected Judge William B. Campbell governor, giving him 63,333 votes, while the Democrats could muster only 61,673 in favor of Gov. Trousdale, and the Legislature elected that year was strongly Whig, the Senate having 16 Whigs to 9 Democrats, and the House 40 Whigs to 35 Demo- erats, though the Democrats succeeded in electing 7 members to Con- *The extra session of the Legislature of 1842 changed the law as to Electoral Districts, making them con- om to the Congressional Districts, which were at that time reduced to eleven, aud provided for two,electors at large.- / “ E { nt 1 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Cy gress to the Whigs 4. In 1852 Tennessee cast 58,802 votes for Gen. Winfield Scott for President, to 57,123 for Franklin Pierce, but in 1803 Andrew Johnson was elected governor over Gustavus A. Henry, the Whig candidate, by a majority of 2.261 in a total vote of 124,581. In 1855 Andrew Johnson was re-elected governor over the American candidate, Meredith P. Gentry, the vote being for Johnson 67,499, and for Gentry 65,224. In the canvass preceding this election the two rival candidates made laudable efforts to “locate” each other politically—Mr. Johnson placing Mr. Gentry among the Federalists by showing that he was willing to vote for Webster for President in 1852, and by calling attention to his yote in Congress for the appropriation for President Harrison’s widow; while Mr. Gentry “located” Mr. Johnson among the Abolitionists, by showing that he was in favor of dividing the State into Congressional Districts on the basis of the voting population, thus ignoring the ‘ three- fifths of all other persons,” who could not be constitutionally ignored. This proposition was known as “ Johnson’s white basis scheme.” In 1856 the tide of political sentiment had begun turning quite strongly in favor of the Democratic party, as shown in the election for President James Buchanan receiving 73,638 votes, while Millard Fill- more, the American candidate, received only 66,178—and by this vote were elected Democratic presidential electors for the first time since 1832, and for the second time in the history of the State. Fremont, the Republican candidate for the presidency, received no votes in Tennessee. In 1860, when occurred the last presidential election previous to the civil war, the vote was as follows: For John Bell, 69,176; for John Breckin- ridge, 64,809; and for Stephen A. Douglas, 11,330. No votes were cast for Abraham Lincoln. In 1857 Isham G. Harris was elected governor over Robert Hatton, the former receiving 71,178 votes to 59.807 for the latter; in 1859 Gov. Harris was re-elected over John Netherland, the votes being for the two candidates, respectively, 76,073 and 68.042; and in 1861 Isham G. Har- ris was again re-elected, receiving 70.273 to 37,915 votes cast for We Ei Polk. Thus stood the parties at the breaking out of the civil war. The question of secession from the Union had been occasionally dis-~ cussed for years before it was finally attempted, but generally in earnest opposition. In 1850 the Hon. A. O. P. Nicholson expressed himself as entertaining strong Union sentiments, saying that South Carolina may pass her secession ordinance, but from that day she will have no more peace.” The policy of secession, however, gradually became more and more popular throughout the Southern States, but obtained a foothold z { ef meERUNUNE-Ertaeme: a Sas. eee eee GET STITT AO ms LSE et . ya an te = me. een ne eT igh So a TT a. a ee ee peg 205 : SS ae Soy Ang — amr ias et a ee ee a a eine a fer Se 2 naan nat ae eta “ o Le gees ee we ay ss ee epg oe i Hl (B Pit Hat! iat ; ben th i tia if ‘1 ai May gee ie ay Vaan ; ! maa wii! suena had tank pad Hi 1 eh pea Ri is i Bea) ieee: He axe nat iat Hi lhe as vt tte ani a Fei 13) 4) hse maibidase Lipide — Senter = ae Sn Sat RS SRO et nO an ees ws = na ae oc Coie a > ‘. Reena: nenmenens ee PE an = chi —— ea oon ae a ? en ae : = > os an oe ss a 2: Bee m a pin emt aes pa aN CELT - a neon a — = . SS —- SS = a — - : ae — os : sa = ~~ ae be es c . ra ae oe. ms ed ET TOT Th = Se 2 B - % - es . = = aia b = isle a aE TL TS Vay = Po alae a oriee meena ff roc on aT cn al el PEI TIN RI ET een. ee ae 5 peered —— eet — —e Ti nanamghpitincoere = = ee en nl pe ; ae eli nee = SESE ErENT ack ee ene omnia eS — Ca ek emreniraratienle ie: HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. more slowly in Tennessee than in the exclusively cotton States. The True Whig, published in Nashville, said in August, 1851: It is a singular fact, yet nevertheless true, that every secessionist who has been elected te Congress in Alabama, North Carolina and Tennessee, or throughout the South, is a Democrat, and all the secession candidates in Mississippi, in which State the election oc- Curs in October next, are Democrats. To this chargethe Daily American, also published in Nashville, replied: There is error in this statement. Strictly speaking there has not been a secessionist elected to Congress from the States named. Some four or five of the members elected to Congress in North Carolina and Alabama believe in the right of secession as an abstract question, as a last resort for aggravated wrong; but not one of them, we believe, is in avor of its exercise for present causes. As to Tennessee, we are at a loss to know who of the members are thus designated as secessionists by the Whig. Wedo not know that a single one of them believes in the constitutional right of a State to secede, even as an ab- stract question. fe It would be difficult, even if desirable, to affirm with precision, when any and which leading member of either the political parties of Tennes- seé first announced his belief in the doctrine of secession as an abstract right. But it is evident, from the following message of Gov. Isham G. Harris, that he, at least, at the time of its writing had become a convert to the doctrine: EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT, February 28, 1860. Gentlemen of the Senate and House of Representatives: [ herewith transmit resolutions adopted by the Legislatures of South Carolina and Mis- sissippi upon Federal relations. Whilst I do not concur in their recommendations, not Seeing the necessity or propriety of a convention of the slaveholding States at this time, I nevertheless deem it proper that I should communicate, and that you should respectfully consider the suggestion of our sister States. Believing, as I do, that the people of Tennessee are loyal to the constitution, in all its parts, and with each and all of its guarantees possessing a jealous regard for the rights of the States; feeling justly apprehensive of encroachments upon them, they would feel and demonstrate, when necessary, their identity with ary of her sister States, in resisting any unjust or unconstitutional warfare upon them or their institutions. The resistance should be, first, by the use of all the constitutional means in our power; to the end that the Union may be preserved as it was formed, and the blessings of a gov- ernment of equality under a written constitution perpetuated. But if the hope of thus obtaining justice shall be disappointed, and the Federal Goy- ernment, in the hands of reckless fanatics, shall at any time become an engine of power to invade the rights of individuals and of States, to follow the example of our fathers of 1776, will be the only alternative left us. While there is much in the present attitude of parties, States and public men in the northern portion of the Confederacy to cause appre- hension as to the security of our rights and the continuance of fraternal feeling, yet there is a probability, and a strong one, that wise, temperate and firm counsels may avert the impending evils. * * * ¥ ¥* * * * Respectfully, IsHAM G. HARRIS. In the resolutions referred to by Goy. Harris in the above message, YY Nie RTO. a . 7 . South Carolina had reaffirmed her right to secede, as affirmed in her or- dinance of 1852, whenever the occasion should arise justifying her in herHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ~] own judgment in taking that step, and favoring the assembling of the Southern States to concert measures for united action. And Missis- sippl had resolved that the election of a President of the United States by the votes of one section of the Union only, on the eround of an irre- eoncilable conflict between the respective systems of labor of the two sec- tions, would so threaten a destruction of the ends for which the constitu- tion was formed, as to justify the slaveholding States in taking counsel together for their separate protection and safety. The attitude of the Southern States thus illustrated was the imme- diate consequence of the John Brown raid on Harper’s Ferry, made Oc- tober 25, 1859. Hight days after John Brown’s foolish and fanatical out- break, a series of resolutions was introduced into the Tennessee Legisla- ture, recognizing the outbreak as the natural fruit of the ‘“ treasonable, irrepressible, conflict doctrine of the great head of the black Republican party, and that it becomes the imperative duty of national men of all parties throughout the Union to unite in crushing out its authors as a) traitors to their country,’ ete. After the election of Mr. Lincoln to the presidency, the three creat political parties in Tennessee, in the presence and anxiety of a common danger (for all were devotedly attached to the institution of slavery), were drawn more closely together in sentiment and feeling. They correctly and clearly perceived that imminent danger threatened the institution of slavery. The leaders of these three parties united in an address to the people of the State, recommending them to assemble in primary meetings to request the Governor to call together the Legislature, with a view to their providing for a State convention, the object of which should be to bring about a conference of the Southern States to consider the existing political troubles, and if possible to compose sectional strife. The first extra session of the Legislature of 1861, convened January a Lhe speaker of the Senate, I. W. Newman, in the course of his opening ad- dress said: We have been called together in the midst of revolution, the consequences of which no man can calculate, I fear no people can now remedy, no State counteract, no Govern- ment stop. The rejection of the just, fair and equitable propositions of the venerable senator from Kentucky staggers the hopes of the most conservative men of the South, Let the Southern States then assemble through their best, their ablest men, without dis- tinction of party. They will adopt a declaration, by which we will all stand, to which we can all pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor. In Southern disunion there are destruction, defeat and ruin, while in co-operation and unity there are safety, property and happiness. Gov. Harris addressed the Legislature in along message 1n which he . " = Ss ~ Uf . . ably reviewed all the charges of aggression against the Northern people upon the institution of slavery and. of its various violations of the Con-oa rT in a AP RR I . my JERS, ed eahannepeapanieibe- aici Ne en ied eS eae en NN REAR ns — } iH fat teat 1h Bi + hae | Wael i I} i ey Hilt He aa RA Py ALARM I: dd er th } etme AV tia , i yi ait i i HA i | | if i i a By iy ah | 1h | Balik a mre ea eae ee en see ae ie eee Zs SS Coe eS aR SE CR NEE RR SN ee mip aaa aT. — Ber c: oe aia erce cain ae soon Ne ok Taine Se cae ae = i PN ae a yg gee oO ee Z Ps ar ete htm penis ~ ot om : See aE SRF PS HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. stitution of the United States; defended the South as not having violat- ed constitutional obligations, recommended several amendments to the constitution, one of which was that these amendments should never be He also said: If the non-slaveholding States should refuse to comply with a demand so just and reasonable; refuse to abandon at once and forever their unjust war upon us, our institu- tions, and our rights; refuse, as they have heretofore done, to perform in good faith the obligations of the compact of union—much as we may appreciate the power, prosperity, greatness, and glory of this Government; deeply as we deplore the existence of causes which have already driven one State out of the Union; much as we may regret the imperative necessity which they have wantonly and wickedly forced upon us, every consideration of self-preservation and self-respect require that we should assert and maintain our “‘ equal- ity in the Union, or independence out of it.” changed without the consent of all the slave States. Thus powerfully did the Governor approach the Legislature, and through that body indirectly, and by other means directly, the people, The latter, however, were not ready for secession, John Bell, but a few months previously, as a candidate for the presidency upon a platform of one plank: “The Union, the Constitution, and the Enforcement of the Laws,” had received over 69,000 votes, and Stephen A. Douglas over 11,000, and it may, with small risk of error, be assumed that this aggregate vote of 81,000 preferred union to disunion. But those who favored secession had the great advantage of able, earnest, and deter- mined leaders, while the Unionists, who should have been and might have been eyen more ably led by John Bell and Andrew John- son, were deprived of such leadership by the characteristic hesitancy of the former with respect to his proper course, and by the absence during a portion of the time from the State of the latter in the Sen- ate of the United States. Notwithstanding this great disadvantage the people of the State, under the less able but equally patriotic T. A. R. Nelson, Horace Maynard, William G. Brownlow and others, when, on the 9th of February they were called upon to decide calling a conven- tion to consider the proper course for the State to pursue, cast 91,803 votes against the convention, to 24,749 in its favor, And up to the hour of the attack upon Fort Sumter, though the Governor and a majority of the Legislature were really in favor of joining the Southern Confederacy, yet they were unable to accomplish this result. After this event it would doubtless have been impossible to stem the tide of secession sentiment. On the 8th of June, so great had been the change in public opinion that upon the questions of separation and no separation, representation and no representation, the vote stood in East Tennessee: For separation, 14,780; no separation, 32,923; representa- tion, 14,601; no representation, 32,962. hed & Middle Tennessee: Separation, I= : a ~ >? e ~ : 58,265; no separation, 7,956; representation, 58,198; no representation,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. rata 8.298. West Tennessee: Separation, 29,127; no separation, 6,117; repre- sentation, 28,902; no representation, 6,104. Camps: Separation, 6,246; no separation, 6,340. Total vote: For separation, 108,418; against separa- tion, 53,336; for representation, 101,701; against representation, 47,364. On the 2d of July, by proclamation of Jefferson Davis, Tennessee became a member of the Southern Confederacy, and on August 1, 1561, a vote was taken on the question of the adoption of the permanent con- stitution of the Confederate States, resulting as follows: Hast Tennes- see—for constitution, 15,429; against it, 26,232. Middle Tennessee— for constitution, 42,931; against it, 9.954: West Tennessee—for consti- stitution, 22,938; against it, 1,568. Military Camps—for constitu- tion, 3,835; against it, 3. Total vote: For constitution, 85,133; against it, oOo. | On October 24, 1861, the Legislature elected two senators to the Confederate Congress, one from the old Democratic party, Landon C. Haynes, and the other from the old Whig party, Gus- tavus A. Henry. | On December 4, 1861, the following presidential electors met in Nashville to cast the vote of the State for President and Vice-President of the Confederate States of America: At large, Robert C. Foster and William Wallace. District electors—F. M. Fulkerson, W. L. Eakin, S. D. Rowan, John F. Doak, George W. Buchanan, Lucius J. Polk, G. A. Washington, R. F. Lamb, Robert B. Hunt, Joseph R. Mosby. John R. Fleming was elected by the foregoing to fill the vacancy caused by the absence of the chosen elector for the second district. After organization the vote of the college was unanimously for Jefferson Davis and Alexan- der H. Stephens for President and Vice-President of the Confederate States. From this time on, until a portion of the State was occupied by the United States soldiers, what political history the State had is mainly narrated in the military chapters. As soon as a portion of Tennessee came under eontrol of Federal authority, measures were taken for the re-establishment of local govern- ment. Gov. Johnson appointed new officers and instructed them to be guided in their course of official action by the constitution and the laws passed previous to the secession of the State, all colored persons coming before a judicial tribunal to be treated as free persons of color. By the latter part of 1864 the entire State had been regained, and on September ) of that year a convention of loyal citizens assembled in the capitol at Nashville in pursuance of the following call: At the request of a meeting of the loyal men representing the several divisions of the State of Tennessee at the capital in Nashville on the 2d day of August, 1864, and in ac- cordance with our own views, we do hereby call a convention of theloyal people of the State of Tennessee, to be holden at Nashville on the first Monday in September next, toa “s er meee ae eae = s B 3 ae ai mR r payne Tee = “a a a et a - a IR pe | Oa are mae 2 as re ; SS a - oe _y ——— : a x = - Sane 2 eee nies . li - a - + Rieti miami > = 2 4 c maa sortie era seats t ee oe a leg! eRe Leora Seale amcor ngbaaacamennin ase ee a new mse a =, ed en FRR See yee ae eee ER Eee eget etiaet nec Be SA OT ee oh per oa aha epee ee al ea a ae ee eee ieee SS. T18 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. take into consideration: ist. The general state of the country. 2d. The means of reorgan- izing civil government and restoring law and order in the State of Tennessee. 38d. The expediency of holding a presidential election in the State in November next, and finally to take such preliminary steps in reference to said matter as they may deem necessary and proper, and we do most earnestly urge upon the loyal order-loving and law abiding people of every county in the State, the great importance of securing a full representation in said proposed convention. W.G. BROWNLOW. HORACE MAYNARD. W. P. JONES. JOHN H. CAMPBELL. M. M. BRIEN. J. B. BINGHAM. J. M. TOMENY. Wi EE Pirem. Jn: About 250 delegates representing fifty-five counties were present. Gen. Samuel Milligan was chosen chairman. The convention remained in session for four days, during which time a series of resolutions was proposed and adopted. Among other things it was resolved that a con- vention of the loyal*people of the State should assemble at as early a day as possible to revise the State Constitution and reorganize the State Government, and that an election for President and Vice-President of the United States should be held in the following November, at which only known active friends of the National Government should be permitted to vote. At the same time the following Lincoln and Johnson electoral ticket was nominated: For the State at large, Horace Maynard and W. H. Wisener; for East Tennessee, L. C. Houk, Robert A. Crawford, J. C. Everett; for Middle Tennessee, J. O. Shackleford, W. B. Stokes, T. H. Gibbs; for West Tennessee, Almon Case, William H. Fitch. On the 30th of September Goy. Johnson issued a proclamation ordering an election to be held in accordance with the above resolution, and prescrib- ing the following oath, to be administered to all voters not publicly known to be active friends of the United States Government: I solemnly swear that I will henceforth support the Constitution of the United States and defend it against the assaults of all its enemies. That I am an active friend of the Government of the United States, and an enemy of the so-called Confederate States; fhat I ardently desire the suppression of the present Rebellion against the Government of the United States; that I sincerely rejoice in the triumph of the armies and navies of thc United States, and in the defeat and overthrow of the armies, navies and armed combina- tions in the so-called Confederate States: that I will cordially oppose all armistices or negotiations for peace with Rebels in arms until the Constitution of the United States, and all laws and proclamations made in pursuance thereof shall be established over all the people of every State and Territory embraced within the National Union; and that I will earnestly aid and assist the loyal people in whatever measure may be adopted for the attainment of these ends; and further that I take this oath freely and voluntarily and without mental reservation. So help me God. [his oath disfranchised a large number who would otherwise have voted at the election, and a protest against the action of Gov. Johnson was prepared and signed by the electors on the McClellan and Pendleton ticket, and presented to the President by John Lelyett, but Mr. Lincoln declined to interfere in the matter. The election was accordingly heldHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 779 in conformity with the Governor’s proclamation, and resulted in an almost unanimous vote for the Lincoln and Johnson electors, who met at the re- quired time and cast their votes, which, however, were not received by Congress. : November 30, 1864, a call was issued by the executive committee of Middle Tennessee, for a convention to be held in Nashville on December 19, ‘“‘for the purpose of forming a ticket to be run for a State Constitu- tional Convention by the loyal men of the State.” At the appointed time the presence of the Confederate Army in the vicinity of Nashville prevented the assembling of the convention, and it was postponed until January 3, 1865, at which date a large number of delegates, representing fifty-nine counties, assembled. The convention was organized with Col. S. R. Rogers, as chairman. A business committee to whom were referred all resolutions, was appointed, composed of the following delegates: Sam- uel Milligan, chairman, J. C. Gaut, Horace Maynard, J. R. Hood. Joseph S Fowler, William Basson, William Spence, H. I’. Cooper, Dr. A. Gregg, J. B. Bingham and Gol. RB. K. Byrd. Two reports were presented. The majority report proposed amendments to the Constitution, to be submitted to the people of Tennessee on the 22d of February following, providing for the abolition of slavery, the disfranchisement of all officers, civil, judi- cial, and others, who had acted in hostility to the United States Govern- ment, the abrogation of the ordinance of secession and.all laws passed after May 6, 1861, and the repudiation of all debts contracted in aid of the Rebellion. A resolution was also adopted requiring voters at the elec- tion for the ratification of the amendment, and at the first State election to subscribe to an oath similar to the one required at the Presidential election in the preceding November A minority report was presented by J. R. Hood, denying the author- ity of this convention to propose amendments to the constitution, and favoring the calling of a regularly elected Constitutional Convention, to be held some time in February. After a long discussion, the majority report was adopted. William G. Brownlow was then unanimously nom- inated for governor. After which the convention adjourned, having been in session for six days. On the 26th of January Gov. Johnson issued a proclamation confirming the action of the convention, and ordering an election to be held on February 92. 1865, to vote upon the amendments, and, provided the amendment carried, also one to be held on March 4, for the election of a governor and members of the General Assembly. The election of February 22, passed off quietly. ‘The proposed amend- ments were adopted almost unanimously, but the vote was quite small, On February 28, although the completed returns had not been received,nore pacman yas eo Io eT . « 2 ¥ Ne pelts 2 Sell ep algae Sapa eon firme Seem gape eee Ee ntl tog: EE ins ante fe oe - - rman : = se it em aa Ra Re kg AE alg a Nig Fh = ee ic NO Si ee an a APE he ee AONE A 180 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Gov. Johnson issued a proclamation declaring the adoption of the amend- ments. Accordingly, the election of the March 4 was held, and William G. Brownlow was chosen governor by a vote of 23,222 to 35. On the 3d of the following month the Legislature convened. William Heiskell, of - Knox County, was chosen speaker by the lower House, and Samuel R. On April 5, 1865, Gov. Brownlow was inaugurated, and on the following day transmitted his Rodgers, also, of Knox County, by the Senate. message to the Legislature. He denounced secession in his most vigor- ous stvle. and advocated the ratification of the amendment to the United States Constitution abolishing slavery. On account of the unsettled con- dition of the country, and the alarming prevalence of crime, he recom- mended that persons convicted of horse stealin g, house-breaking and highway robbery be punished with death. ‘Let the proof in all such cases be clear and unquestionable, and then let the offenders be hung, even He advised that the pay of all State officers and members of the General Assembly be increased, reviewed the financial for the first offense.”’ condition of the State, and discussed the subject of the common schools, railroads, the State Bank, and other State institutions. The Legislature remained in session until Monday, June 12. One of the most important measures adopted was an act to limit the franchise, known as the “Arnel! bill.” restricted to the following persons: White men over twenty-one years of By its provisions the right of suffrage was age who were publicly known to have entertained unconditional Union sentiments from the outbreak of the Rebellion; or who had arrived at the age of twenty-one years since March 4, 1865, and had not been en- gaged in armed rebellion against the United States Government; also those who had served in the Federal Army.and had been honorably dis- charged; those who had been conscripted by force into the Confederate Army, and were known to be Union men; and those who had voted at the elections in February and March, 1865. All other persons were dis- franchised. For all persons who had held civil or diplomatic offices un- der the Confederate States, or who had held a military office above the rank of captain, if in the army, or lieutenant, if in the navy; also for those who had resigned seats in Congress or positions in the army or navy, or had absented themselves from the United States for the purpose of aiding the Rebellion, the term of disfranchisement was to continue for a period of fifteen years from the passage of the act. For all persons not included in any of the above classes the right of suffrage was to be withheld for five years. It was made the duty of the clerk of each coun- ty court to open and keep a registration of votes, and before him proof of loyalty was to be made. It was provided, however, that ‘‘no man ofHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. . 7S] publicly-known Union sentiments” should be required to make oath upon registering, and that no person not registered was to be permitted to vote. A person challenged by an admitted voter was required to take an oath of allegiance and fidelity to the State and the United States Govern- ment, and any persons taking the oath falsely was declared guilty of per- jury, and subject to the pains and penalties attached to that crime. By the passage of this act a very large proportion of the former vot- ers of the State were disfranchised, and it was regarded by them as an act of great injustice. At this session, also, the revenue laws of the State were amended, and a high tax was levied on the sales of merchan- dise and other commercial and legal transactions. The Legislature ad- journed to meet on the first Monday in October, at which time it again convened. Meanwhile an election for congressmen had been held Aug- ust 3, 1865, under the new franchise law, and the following men were chosen: N. G. Taylor, Horace Maynard, Edmund Cooper, W. B. Stokes, W. B. Campbell, D. B. Thomas, I. R. Hawkins and J. W. Leftrich. Upon the beginning of the next session of Congress these members, to- gether with Joseph S. Fowler and D.S. Patterson, senators-elect, pre- sented themselves for admission, but were refused their seats upon the grounds that Tennessee had not yet been restored to her position in the Union. June 16, 1865, Congress submitted the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution to the States for their ratification, and three days later Gov. Brownlow issued a proclamation convening the Legislature on the 4th of July for the purpose of considering it. A quorum of the lower house could not be obtained for several days, and as a last resort the sergeant-at-arms was ordered to arrest and bring in the members who had absented themselves to prevent the ratification otf the amendment. A. J. Martin, of Jackson County, and P. Williams, of Carter County, were brought in, and onthe 19th of July a ballot was taken, the arrested members refusing to vote. The result is tersely given in the following dispatch: NASHVILLE, TENN., July 19, 12 o’clock M. Hon. Edwin M. Stanton, Secretary of War, Washington, D.C.: My compliments to the President. We carried the constitutional amendment in the House. Vote, forty-three to eleven, two of his tools refusing to vote. WILLIAM G. BROWNLOW. Only two other States, Connecticut and New Hampshire, had preceded Tennessee in this action. As soon as information of the ratification reached Congress, a joint resolution was adopted declaring that “ the State of Tennessee is hereby restored to her former practical relations to the Union, andis again entitled to be represented by senators and represent- atives in Congress.” The resolution was signed by the President, who 49z ip gg Sa, mee cesar ate eA ae +n, clap Solano ery aoa eget nn - =, = = oe eo eee nee gers scnppcannameeas Sole one rae eee Ae onal cir” 2 aS TT a Cnn ager etl . ee SS NR sai eit Sena enn tamer tia ie ee ~aenial sneer ara SS Se =< ie pn ie cot acne eee —— = ee aha peat ee 3 ed TI 2) itp EEA IIE POE Coane ne > eens Tig "= eae * * “3 a eS $5 soos eters = 2 OE 6 ipa mt PN a aere 2) ee ee = = See ae eigen ee cotta emetariailaminemipiinemane grammes FIO TE (82 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. returned it with a special message, 1n which he stated that he had signed the bill merely to avoid delay, and added: ‘‘ My approval is not to be con- strued as an acknowledgment of the right of Congress to pass laws pre- liminary to the admission of duly qualified representatives from any of the States.” As has been stated, the Thirty-fourth General Assembly re-assembled on October 2, 1865. The majority of both Houses held extreme radical views on the question of restricting the elective franchise, but there was a determined minority in favor of a much more liberal policy in dealing with those who had participated in the Rebellion. On January 19, 1866, a new “franchise bill” was introduced. Its provisions were very similar to those of the act which it was intended to supersede, except that they were more comprehensive. It excluded from the privilege of the fran- chise all who had borne arms against the United States, or who had in any way voluntarily aided the Rebellion; also those who had ever sought or accepted office, civil or military, under the so-called Confederate Gov- ernment. It established an office of Commissioner of Registration in each county, and certificates of registration were required at all elections municipal, county and State. It soon became apparent to the opponents of the bill that, unless some unusual measures were adopted to prevent 1t, it would become a law. Consequently, when it came up for a third reading in the House, enough members absented themselves to prevent a quorum, and contin- ued to do so for several days. Finally, the majority of the absentees tendered their resignations.* Gov. Brownlow, assuming the seats of all members willfully absenting themselves to be vacant, issued a proclama- tion for an election to be held on March 31, 1866, to fill the vacancies. Nearly all who had resigned were candidates for re-election, and with five exceptions, were returned with large majorities. Meanwhile, both the Senate and House had continued the session by adjournment from day to day, and upon the restoration of a quorum, the consideration of the franchise bill was resumed. It passed both Houses, and became a law on May 3. During this session an attempt was made to erect Hast Tennessee in- to a separate State. A similar effort had been made at the beginning of the war, but it was suppressed by the Confederate State authorities. In April, 1866, Gen. Joseph A. Cooper published a letter advocating the measure, and on the 3d of May following, a convention of delegates from twenty-two counties assembled at Knoxville, for the purpose of memorial- *The seceding members were W. B. Lewis, Samuel P. Walker A. E. Garrett, Asa Faulkner, A. A. Free- man, J. F. Thomas, Abner A. Steele, W. B. Scales, A. R. Wynne, Thomas H. Bledsoe, William Barton, P. Will- iams, C. N. Ordway, N. Brandon, W. K. Poston, M. E. W. Dunnaway, W. W. Willi i UN. Way, a Wi, «Ke MoE; We _W. Willis, A. D. Nicks, James BR. Hood, William Simmons, Joseph H. Travis, A, C. Gillem and Wallace Waters.HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 783 izing the Legislature for leave to form anew State. An address to the people of East Tennessee was published, and a committee, consisting of Joseph A. Cooper, D. C. Trewhitt, John Caldwell, L. C. Houk, William Alexander, S. J. W. Luckey, A. B. Owens and M. L. Phillips, were ap- pointed to prepare the memorial. Mr. Senter presented it to the Sen- ate, and accompanied it with a joint resolution, requesting the Governor to issue writs of election to the sheriffs of the several counties repre- sented in the convention, commanding them to hold an election for the purpose of ascertaining the sentiments of the people upon the question. The resolution was referred to a special committee, consisting of two from each grand division of the State, who made two reports. The majority report, signed by the members from Middle and West Tennessee, advised the rejection of the petition, and expressed the opinion that to grant it would be unconstitutional. The minority report, signed by D. W. C. Senter and C. J. McKinney, of East Tennessee, favored grant- ing the request. The majority report was adopted. On November 5, 1866, the General Assembly convened for the fourth and last time. The position of that body at this time was far from envia- ble. From the first, representing, as it did, but a small fraction of the voters of the State, it received but little moral support from the com- munity for which it was supposed to legislate, and now the disfranchised party, adopting the views of Andrew Johnson, believed and maintained that they were unjustly deprived of their constitutional rights, and denounced the Legislature and the executive with unmeasured severity. This action on the part of the people, as may be supposed, did not tend to make those in authority any the less vigorous in their measures. Dur- ing this session the franchise act was again amended, admitting the negroes to its privileges, but at the same time denying them the right to hold office or to sit upon juries. Another measure e of scarcely less im- portance was the organization and equipment of a State militia. A force of about 1,700 men was raised, and placed under the command of Gen, Joseph A. Cooper. ‘These troops, distributed to those points in the State where the greatest danger of an insurrection was supposed to exist, were maintained until after the election in August, when all but five companies were disbanded. On February 22, 1867, the Republican State Convention assembled at Nashville, and unanimously renominated William G. Brownlow for gov- ernor. The resolutions adopted were, in substance: That equal rights should be granted to all; that those who saved the State in time of peril should govern and control it; that those who sought to destroy it, should not be faerie restored to their former privileges; and the course of the> 7 as Py “ es he 3 » = = SS ae Pe eS ee Bee a a hs SRE ao oR aoa ae si Saag Te ae . " . PRE Sey ec i Sa ka a sc - = = Seetnenn ee - So a al - been eee Sofas oe ws fain. 5 SS ni ai mee es r Fin ER tera Le ioe tomcat etla tints ~ EL OP tae oa SS A Ss oe "3 Fei i STREET A i, E = Gao a: ab} i | el} Hl ERTL Lae t Ep SoU Re beat Hie tee Hato ih ieee aH IE ego Haare ae ce ; i) add Plates ie far ue li i) yo ; f ig fh } rea i, a ve ” i Ghia Te A of Peete Nk | aH i 1 ee { fy a a bn ent a | i we fg! Pe . Nt Hitec | at i TER a ook 4 : , { H , iit | ; Vader ‘ vets d | He i i leas i i a Waa tat tah hil] ac ia i } ies? Py mek Sh rea f a te at 4 i : ea] ea 4 i i i menses i Hh i a ai ih i! } 1 aq a Ee tt 4 at Ha aii VaR Hit be eet 1 { TT . eae | i . Pane aint i ik CEI a Bate AMATI Ah Bat || Ht Rid es) : 1 f 1 H | i Pa i ti | ) Shei tt oi H ihe tl i My Mm saga || | { J ij | i + Baa ae La wy , ia 1 ti Sais | teat yt : Waal: 4 ae \| | it Hi | Ay iii) fe pa ( Fs | A i We | il | | i Wl) i Way oan | i Raat a | i Baie) tae | Mat a ee nt AM aie EA (I oy at "84 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. General Assembly and the administration of Goy. Brownlow had been highly satisfactory. The policy of the Union Republican party in Con- gress, inits opposition to President Johnson, was also endorsed. The Democratic State Convention met on the 16th of April, and nom- inated Emerson Etheridge of West Tennessee, for governor. Mr. Ether- idge was a man of publicly known Union sentiments, and at the begin- ning of the war was compelled to leave his home anaccount of his hostil- ity to the course of secession, but with the return of peace he had joined that considerable number of original Union men in the South who sup- ported President Johnson in his policy of reconstruction and who be- came the bitterest opponents of the Republican party. The convention adopted resolutions favoring the immediate restoration of all disfran- chised citizens to complete citizenship and approving the course of Presi- dent Johnson. The campaign which followed was one of the greatest excitement. The granting of the right of suffrage to the negroes, while so largea proportion of the white citizens was debarred from voting, justly aroused intense opposition, and the State guards, re-enforced by régular troops, were not sufficient to prevent out-breaks. The election however, passed off quietly. The franchise law was strickly enforced, and the Republican candidates were successful in nearly every instance, The Thirty-fifth General Assembly, which convened on the 7th of October, 1867, contained but few old members, although there was but little change in its political complexion. D. W. C. Senter was chosen speaker of the Senate, and F. S. Richards of the House. The session continued until March 16, 1868, during which time but few laws of importance were enacted, On October 23, 1867, the two houses met in convention and elected Goy. Brownlow to succeed D. S. Patterson in the United State Senate, for the term beginning March 4, 1869. Mr. Patterson had been elected to the office soon after the reorganization of the State Government in 1865, and during his entire term had acted with the Democratic party in support of President Johnson and his recon- struction measures. The Republican State Convention to appoint delegates tothe National Convention, which was held on January 22, 1868 recommended the nomi- nation of General Grant for the presidency, while the Democratic Con- vention, which met on the 9th of June, endorsed Andrew Johnson as its candidate. During the early part of this year, a new organization began to exert an influence in the political affairs of the State. It first made its appear- ance in the vicinity of Columbia, in Maury County, and from there it spread rapidly over, not only Tennessee, but the entire South. It is saidHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 785 to have originated in a bit of harmless pleasantry on the part of some masqueraders who amused themselves by imposing upon the superstitious fears of the negroes. The success of their adventures suggested the or, ganization of a band for protection against the depredations of negroes and worthless camp-followers and turbulent characters left behind upon the disbanding of the armies. ‘’o the societies thus formed the name of Ku Klux Ktans was given. Their operations were conducted with the greatest secrecy, and costumes, names, and symbols of the most outland- ish and mysterious character were adopted. From a merely protective social organization, it soon developed into a political and military order of the highest discipline. It was stated by Gen. Forrest, in September, 1868, that the Ku Klux Klans of Tennessee, alone, could put 40,000 men into the field in five days. It was also said that in many lo- valities 1,500 members could be brought from their homes to a com- mon rendezvous within three hours after the first signal was given Men of all professions and conditions became members of the order. As a political organization it was arrayed against the Loyal League, which also originated in Henmessee; about the close of the war. At that time the white Unionists of middle and West Tennessee, and the colored people, who ge snerally a alieec 11 to them, found themselves threat- ened, oppressed, and in some localities robbed and murdered. ‘The re- sult was the organization of a powe rful social order known as the Loyal League, which united the members of that laros but cowed class, gave them means of secret and rapid communication with each other, enabled them to protect each other’s person and property, and to avenge wrongs done to their numbers. Upon the reorganization of the State govern- ment accompanie xd by the disfranchisement of their former enemies, their power was greatly increased, and it is not surprising that they used it in retaliation. Thus the oppressors became the oppresse 1; evil-minded per- sons obtained control of the organization, and in many localities numer- ous outrages were committed in the name of the Loyal League. To this cause was largely due the almost phenomenal erowth of the Ku Klux organization ; indeed the history of the two orders is very similar. Both were formed for protection purposes, later became power ful noite sal or- ganizations, and finally went beyond the control of their original leaders, and by unscupulous men were made to cover the most terr ‘ple outrages, On July 6, 1868, Gov. Brownlow issued a De ee convening the General Assembly in extraordinary session on the 27th of the same month. That body met at the ap pointed time ¢ and received a message from the Governor, calling attention to the recent Ku Klux outrages, and recommending the reorganization of the State Militia. He also advisedee oS * a ee aes — Se Sn ae eee meee Serene aS ee ~ ee Sata a ee anh Fe SE - ee. Ene a EF J ed ne eM ae ae : al al, | ee a eae! Wt athe et ERT Fi | pi Maat ee | lh 2 bit ‘taal rah anid 3} 1 yee a ae a a a if al shel et 5 | Re Re Re ea PH DBs aah ian | Ae iat 1 [Re al eet, haat || Li ie atk aves | Lee i at Rite TBE cea Pile 25 age aa Wee rE aD ee Hey) enn i Ie ah il ele att H tek ee ips: aE i haa it ngs | peat WE Penh 1 itea | Wee eth HLA A eh Retail Ty atia | Weg is Ri ae a a, {meet bh Mh Hee a We ee Vi i ath | t ny 1 Hh) | i nn Hit Se | i 4 if ‘hh i 1] ; it hail Heal bebe ciety (eee Eide eh eat i j Bill at ia if} LF pnt aie Weleda || HH | at ee ; li W i 1 NE ey Uae ; Hi aad aera " wi jig | ah ail | a TER PyaL TBH may ieiiays il i i ! i i ' ii} a a | , igen q bik oa Pe Ca er ba | i "ba | ¥ HH Thi Py Day ih || | ae i iW 4; i PRR eM E Ey |i ! ny e Watt ay | i bah i i ) aA | ip f Maye ie | | anise Ru | tH | at Tey | ; ‘ i Ns 7 mts Py 7 EE te WTR Sao mre nite A ans “ss ~ . S SS ee a - oe N pt nahi ke Gm _ —— - : aes z ress i f = oa Scots i : ‘ee 3 ee — ours er) ets a ~ in * es — — Tis cP be ae S = — - aw eaten A ae - 3 - — ome ra ar aa ei once aiaan anna ae = = a ane pe ma 4 an a ca _ = - as aoa . ee — Oia ee a a > = cies “= See rs i = é cieceeeetmentan ant Sarna tae 2 ae 766 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. some action with reference to the finances of the State, and these were the subjects which mainly occupied the attention of the Legislature dur- ing the session. A bill was introduced into the House providing for the organization of the State Militia, under the name of the ‘Tennessee State Guards,” and giving the governor power to declare martial law in any county where he might deem it necessary. Petitions against the passage of the bill were sent in from all quarters, and many members of the Legislature entered their protest against it. Nevertheless, it became a law, and on February 20, 1869, Goy. Brownlow issued a proclamation, declaring martial law in Overton, Jackson, Maury, Giles, Marshall, Law- rence, Gibson. Madison and Haywood Counties, among which he ordered - Gen. Cooper to distribute the State Guards, then numbering 1,600. On February 12 Goy. Brownlow tendered the resignation of his of- fice, and on the 25th D. W. C. Senter, speaker of the Senate, was inaug- Two months later, May 20, 1869, the Repub- + ah lican State Convention met at Nashville to nominate a candidate for gov- urated as his successor. ernor. Gov. Senter had already announced his own candidacy, and was supported by an enthusiastic delegation. His opponent was Wilham B. Stokes, the commander of a regiment of Tennessee Federal Cavalry dur- ing the war, and at that time the representative of his district in Con- gress. The convention assembled, and, after continuing, amidst great excitement and confusion, for two days, without effecting an organiza- tion, 1t adjourned, with each faction claimin g its candidate to be the reg- ular nominee. In the canvass the franchise question immediately be- came the dominant one, and practically absorbed all others. Goy. Senter issued an address to the people, in which he said: ‘“‘The question which most interests the people of Tennessee at the present, time, and which, in itself, is perhaps more pressing and important than any other, is the elective franchise. On this subject I am free to say that, in my judg- ment, the time has come, and is now, when the limitations and disabili- ties which have found their way into our statute books, as the result of the war, should be abolished and removed; and the privilege of the elective franchise restored and extended to embrace the mass of the adult population of the State.” Mr. Stokes represented the view of the more extreme element of the party, and, while favoring the restoration of the franchise privilege, insisted that it should be done gradually and under certain restrictions. The Democrats, powerless to accomplish anything of themselves, framed no platform and nominated no ticket, leaving the contest ostensibly to the two Republicans. ~In reality, however, the Democracy was better organized than either of the Republican factions, and they threw their influence in favor of Senter, who also received theHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ~ oO ~ support of Senator Brownlow and the Knoxville Whig. Owing to the extreme laxity with which the registration was conducted, a very large vote was cast at the ensuing election, and it was estimated that of the 170,000 votes polled nearly 75,000 were cast by Democrats. Goy. Sen- ter’s majority reached nearly 60,000. Of the members of the Legisla- ture elected only 5 representatives and 2 senators had ever held seats in either house before, and a majority of them were either conservative Republicans or Democrats. The Thirty-sixth General Assembly convened on the 4th of October, and on the 19th began balloting for a United States Senator to succeed Joseph S. Fowler. Several candidates were presented, of whom Andrew Johnson received the largest number of votes, but not a majority of all cast. After a number of ballots the opponents of Mr. Johnson united in support of Henry Cooper, senator from Davidson County, who was elect- ed by a vote of 55 to 51. In accordance with the pledges given during the preceding campaign, the Legislature repealed most of the obnoxious laws, and passed an act providing for an election to be held on the third Saturday in December, to vote upon a constitutional convention, to as- semble on the second Monday of the following January. The bill pro- vided that all male citizens over twenty-one years of age, who had been SU residents of the State six months preceding the election, should be per- mitted to vote. The election resulted in a large majority in favor of the convention, an account of which is given in another chapter of this work, The first election after the adoption of the new constitution took place on the second Tuesday in November, 1870. The Democratic Convention of that year met at Nashville, on the 13th of September, and nominated Gen. John C. Brown, of Giles County, for governor. The Republican Convention assembled at the same place on the 22d of September, and chose W. H. Wisener, of Bedford County, as its nominee by acclamation. The most important questions discussed during the campaign were con- nected with the financial policy of the State. Gen. Brown advocated substantially the same policy that was afterward embodied in the fund- ing act of 1873*, and was elected by a vote of 78,979 to At 5005 Zhe Legislature chosen at the same time was Democratic by a large majority. Thus the great struggle, which for nearly five years had disturbed the peace and prosperity of the State, was brought to an end at last. A new constitution, framed by the representatives of the whole people, had’ been adopted by the people, and a government elected by the universal suffrages of the free citizens of ‘Tennessee was inaugurated for the first time since 1834. *See Chapter XI.a eetee Gry eee i a , — y Peet a ee ee Saeed on | . = a = Sr ISS : 5 : ee 4 r ae sae =e ad nae E = Fo ca gent agg: eonenanege eeepc) ghee nem me eS Ste ST Sere oes d Cee Ee : _ aoe een are a ae ee ee ae 2c ae , eJ BP A mate pir mee Ti = : een ones i SS os: ae a i aa ig tinct cece Se “i - big lands ae en - " = SSeS GI SRE Ra ag ia +. oahiaageuaantisoonoeg ab oe aes a, Cae ae | ne ' aay Var aL il a Lae)! He par | Bt Vay | i SV aa ‘4 ii Hy | AL i Mt oe Hy qt ’ fe 1 i} Hat 1 Fa e , 4 3] tn PAUL cee a) Re Berea HTB HR Ee Ort Path I if \ | ran EI ite | ini | | 3] i i ti A i Hi i at | i ith ii ii | hi i ti HISTORY TENNESSEE. OF An unsuccessful attempt had been made, however, to induce Congress to declare the proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1870 void, and to “reconstruct” Tennessee upon the same plan as the other Southern States. A long investigation into the political condition of the State was oO conducted by Congress, but it resulted in nothing detrimental to the new State government. The investigation was based upon the following statements made by members of Congress from Tennessee: FORTY FIRST CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, Hon. B. F. BuTuER, WAsHINGTON, D. C., February 15, 1870. Chairman Reconstruction Committee. As representatives from the State of Tennessee in the Forty first Congress, in behalf of ourselves and our constituents, we submit the following propositions, and earnestly press their immediate consideration upon your committee: 1. We submit that the power now controlling the State of Tennessee is wholly illegal and revolutionary, brought about by fraud and violence in contravention of the constitu- tion of the State as reorganized by Congress. 2. That the present State government of Tennessee is wanting in the great and es- sential requisite of good government, without which peace and happiness are impossible, to wit, the proper protection of the property and the lives of its citizens. 3. The State government of Tennessee, as now constituted and revolutionized, has never had any recognition by the Government of the United States, and we ask that Con- gress take immediate steps to provide for us a government, Republican in form, that will conduce to the happiness of and welfare of all its people. 4. We ask that you supplement this work with an act for the enforcement of the third section of the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Signed, SAMUEL M. ARNELL. W. B. STOKEs. W. J. SMITH. W. F. Prosser. HORACE MAYNARD. During the latter part of 1871 the new political movement, which re- sulted in the nomination of Horace Greeley for the presidency, began to LEWIS TILLMAN. manifest itself. On October 7, 1871, a reunion and reform association was organized at Nashville by several of the leading men of the State, among whom were Emerson Etheridge, A. S. Colyar, E. H. Hast, H. 8. Foote, Frank T. Ried and John Ruhm. An address was issued to the people of the State, setting forth the principles and objects of the associ- ation, which included the restoration of fraternal feelings between the North and the South, the maintenance of law and order, the establish- ment of an efficient system of education, a general amnesty, opposition to repudiation, reduction of taxation by the General Government and civil service reform. Tarly in the following year the Liberal Republican movement reached the State, and in March, 1872. the leaders of the reform association issued an address to the Republicans of Tennessee, urging the appointment of delegates to the Cincinnati Convention, to be held the Ist of May. Conservative members of both of the old parties who were op- posed to President Grant and his administration, joined in the movement, and a full delegation was appointed. In the convention, Mr, Greeley wasHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 789 not the first choice of the Tennessee delegates, and it was only in the sixth and last ballot that he received their vote. The campaign which followed was one of the most memorable in the history of rite State abounding in anomalous situations and combinations. The Demovratte State Convention assembled at Nashville on May 9, in which delegates from seventy-three counties were present. Benjamin J. Lea, of Elare wood County, was chosen chairman. The convention expressed itself as opposed to an independent Democratic ticket, and favored supporting the Cincinnati nominees. Delegates to the Baltimore convention were ap- pointed, and an electoral ticket was partially completed. Gen. Brown was renominated for governor by acclamation. The Republicans held two State conventions during the year. The first assembled on the 15th of May, and appointed delegates to the National Convention, with instructions to support Grant and Maynard for the presidency and vice-presidency, respectively. No candidate for gov- ernor was nominated, it being deemed at that time, the best policy to make no contest. On the 4th of September, however, a second ponent tion was held, and A. A. Freeman, of Haywood County, was nomi- nated for that office. On September 1, Col. A. S. Colyar announced himself as an Independent candidate for governor, but a month later withdrew from the canvass. As important as were the other contests during the campaign, public interest centered in the canvass for congressman for the State at large. The Democratic Convention to nominate a candidate for that office assem- bled August 21, 1882. The candidates for the nomination were Andrew Johnson and Gen. B. F. Cheatham. Before a ballot was taken Johnson’s supporters withdrew, and the remaining delegates declared Gen. Cheat- ham the nominee. Mr. Johnson immediately announced himself as the people’s candidate, and received enthusiastic support from the working men. Previous to this time the Republicans had despaired of electing a candidate, and none had been nominated. ‘This division in the ranks otf their opponents rendered success almost certain, and at the convention on September 4 Horace Maynard was declared the nominee for congressman for the State at large. A thorough canvass of the State was made by the three candidates, a portion of the time being given to joint debate. The result of the election was as follows: Maynard, 80,825, Cheatham 69,- 188, and Johnson 87,900. The vote for both Grant and Freeman was larger than had been anticipated, but they were defeated by a majority of about 12,000. The Legislature elected was as follows: Senators—Dem- ocrats, 14; Republicans: ‘7, and Independent, 4; representatives—Dem- ocrats, 40; Republicans, 28, and Independent, 4.oe ee TO ee inten aon ' — Page pacer Se ral = ies unedeaeee ee - arb = : ial | a hs ae 7 7 : i 4 ai aa || F | ie i By. : de 0 it Vy th hal a rh We a er 2 ea it Beit ‘ on (ets es Mae ae aes patie ee a ua) clea Be fs | Malay ie aie a Bal Hatin Le ie ; a eae ne tee want ns edie | een TA) DB eh Got eae lias a ph See hid hd AH pail , i ; t i 1 HY t Te aa i Bie at agate Wel La A i ' ; : ! ; i ee ieee men ated 1 Ee el pearel a Mt i ye 1h ia } eae eaten ¢ in el lite if WP ey ugh my il Ce ee i} i Ha ; Te Rene Bel i nie ea : beianic lat . Pee ‘ i ; e } c i f ay eee i} { : x i ieee? ‘ H SRL AT | Pe TRH 2B an eg alt We Pineentits (tary e | Te A Oy Mt eam gs TUR GU \ PT a ey Mae ABOU a a8 i bie a Bile : | Cea aH ‘ eid age (bh wit . ty ny) ie itt he aaa Huet idenia i Lea aya yin I Rie) Cedaia | Abe t : } i +] ty ig 14 Wiese ee i (Leal | tee | YO eo ae ee li ay mee in) ea Hi ie (ig Staal ee beat hme IU Da . | ' } a) tia tf | ida tn . Beet lg i . Pasha e hed baal dy TEE eu a | P btes at ti } it ie Hl mel gi i | td} 1 i} i i / SH BTEW BREUER! a STA aa) ea aia) bla ba A ae LPP TE ae em) | ae ; ut) } fou i i By lle til nes imate 4 ii a hE el be ha i i | ; mali iy if i | sy Toa ati) th Bve aA) ail ) a ae Hout i } i Nee hina g ii i] i ¥ i et | anes! ; | é * { ai ; ity 1 ‘| \ i} " | i a it} : ay / cathe tae il ; meat ay | i } ; y ths ee nt | | s ret iG! 1 it ay ee) eee Pernt nie | il ity Hee ean | Sr RY IA j \ g Pen ie tn aati.) | al j 1 Wit : Bi) bers ‘ aot | i? ‘ i ei it a ca | Hi! | +E l ik i | t ‘ iy ‘ He 1 , WT ae ie lis " vail HI Pill UAW) Be | ; pen Hes a a Oe a Ne fit bE ii | I ! 2 Bia Tea, i ahi H e | Wa Til 790 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The most important legislation accomplished by this General Assem- bly was the passage of the funding act and the establishment of a system of public schools. The two years witnessed but little agitation in politi- eal circles. There was a general return to the old organizations, result- ing in a considerable strengthening of the Democratic party, which en- tered the next campaign well organized, and acting with remarkable una- nimity. The Democratic State Convention, to which all “ anti-radicals” were invited, assembled at Nashville August 19, 1874, and organized with G. A. Henry, of Montgomery County, as president. Twelve candi- dates were placed before the convention, and on the fourteenth ballot James D. Porter, of Henry County, received the nomination. The part of the platform adopted relating to State issues declared in favor of pro- tection to honest labor, equality of assessment for taxation, opposition to monopolies, the abolishment of unnecessary offices and a reduction of sal- aries, rigid economy in the State administration, opposition to any policy looking to the raising of a greater revenue than was necessary to carry on the State government and meet all its honest obligations, and opposi- tion to any increase of taxation. Mr. Porter, the nominee of the con- vention, a successful lawyer, was a member of the lower house of the General Assembly in 1859-60, and served during the war as assistant ad- jutant-general on the staff of Gen. Cheatham. The Republican Convention met at Chattanooga September 16, 1874, and nominated Horace Maynard for governor. Resolutions were acopted opposing the funding and assessment acts, indorsing public schools, and denouncing Goy. Brown’s administration as incompetent and unwise. Dur- ing the campaign the civil rights bill, which was then before Congress, was one of the leading questions discussed, and did much to defeat the Republicans. The Democratic victory was one of the most complete ever gained by a party in the State. over 45,000. The Legislature was almost unanimously’ Democratie, there being only two Republicans in the Senate and six in the House. Nine out of the ten congressmen elected were also Democrats. One of the first duties of the Thirty-ninth General Assembly, which convened on the first Monday in January, 1875, was the election of a United States Senator to succeed William G. Brownlow. Several candi- dates were presented, prominent among whom were Andrew Johnson, Gov. Brown and Gen. William B. Bate. Fifty-five ballots were taken, resulting in the election of Mr. Johnson, he receiving fifty-two out of ninety-seven votes cast. On the forty-fourth ballot Gen. Bate received forty-eight of the ninety-six votes cast. The campaign of 1876 found the political situation changed but little Gov. Porter’s majority reachedHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. TOL from what it had been two years before. The Democratic State Conven- tion to appoint delegates to the National Convention met at Nashville on May 31, 1876. John H. Crozier, of Knoxville, was elected chairman. Resolutions were adopted, advocating civil service reform, the repeal of the resumption act of 1875, the repeal of the national banking system, and opposition to a further contraction of the currency and to a protec- tive tariff. ‘The convention also expressed a preference for Thomas A, Hendricks for President. At a convention held in August, presided over by James D. Richard- son, of Rutherford County, Gov. Porter was unanimously nominated and William B. Bate and Isham G. Harris were chosen electors for the State at large. ‘The platform adopted outlined the same financial policy as that of two years before. As the nomination of Mr. Harris for elector at large was distasteful to many members of the party, he withdrew, and E. A. James, of Hamilton County, was substituted in his place. Soon after the Democratic Convention Dorsey B. Thomas announced himself as an Independent candidate for governor, stating that on National issues he was in harmony with the Democratic party, but opposed to its policy with regard to the State debt. While opposing repudiation, he favored a decreased taxation until the people should become better able to bear the burden imposed upon them by the debt. The Republican party also held two conventions, the first on May 17, to appoint delegates to the National Convention, and the second on the 24th of August, to nominate electors for the State at large, H. S. Foote and A. H. Pettibone being the nominees. No candidate for gov- ernor was nominated. The platform advocated opposition to “the unjust tax laws,” and to the convict-lease system, and denounced the Democratic party for levying a high tax and then failing to provide for the payment of the interest on the State debt. It also demanded the repeal of what was known as the “ dog law,” a law passed by the preceding Legislature, levying a tax upon dogs. During the campaign two other candidates for governor, Gen. George Maney and W. F. Yardley, a colored lawyer of Knoxville, announced themselves. Both advocated the principles of the Republican party. On November 6, just before the election, Gen. Maney withdrew, and the greater part of his support was transferred to Mr. Thomas. The election again resulted in a great victory for the Democratic can- didates. Gov. Porter received a majority of ‘about 50,000 over Mr. Thomas, while Maney and Yardley received about 10,000 and 2.000 votes, respectively. The State Legislature remained nearly Democratic. In January, 1877, two United States Senators were elected, one to suc-LE RE ae . SST Te we Tae He SES SLATS TS ot 0 a TERT omen RLS ery ae re ER I gS BP the NE ke ae < ‘tind = 1 - : 7 = er oe - = ane - ae eater ~_ a Dantiocs ere a : : ey moe ~ 5 * acces 7 a aaemere ees cee Fn ae : are SS en el > SaaS + i niga tae SS —— ee ? = = ‘ nope: 7 3 i > partes ToS sapere Tcl. ipa we poe bres Be Pe rend ln on entay ‘ange —_ = ane piicse: te heer aig MOUNTS ONE NG Sa a sy Co ee eat cegea a naal SR a a RR el LO AT neat earns ati nm - - a a A OC re a ae me natn Sea NT a a a SS ee ee — oma spe ness Ae ae a PE ee Stee ener igo 792 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ceed Henry Cooper and the other to fill out the unexpired term of An- drew Johnson. To the long term Isham G. Harris was elected on the first ballot. James E. Bailey and D. M. Key, who then occupied the seat by appoint- ment from the Governor. On the seventy-third ballot Mr. Bailey, of Montgomery County, was elected, having received fifty-five of the one To the short term the contest lay between William B. Bate, hundred votes cast. During this session of the General Assembly the holders of a large part of the State bonds offered to compromise by accepting a settlement of the debt on a basis of 60 cents on the dollar. The Legislature, how- ever, adjourned without taking action upon the proposition, and an extra in on December 5,1877. The session was called for that purpose, to beg session continued nearly a month, but no settlement was effected. In the campaign of the following year the “State debt” question was again the leading issue, and threatened to break up the existing par- ties. The Democratic Convention met on August 15, 1878, and contin- ued in session for three days. Several candidates for the nomination for governor were presented, prominent among whom were John M. Flem- ing, of Knoxville; John H. Savage, of McMinnville; A. S. Colyar, of Nashville, and John V. Wright, of Maury County. one ballots without a choice. a compromise candidate in the person Of: “Ag After taking twenty- S. Marks, of Franklin County, was presented, and-on the next ballot he received the nomination. Mr. Marks had been a life-long Democrat, was originally opposed to secession, served in the Confederate Army, losing a leg at Murfreesboro, and at the time of his nomination was chancellor of his district. As the party was much divided upon the financial policy, no opinion was expressed upon the subject, but it was proposed to sub- mit the question to a popular vote. The Republican Convention assembled at Nashville on the 22d of August. Forty-nine counties were represented, and H. 8. Foote was chosen chairman. The committee on resolutions reported a platform embodying much the same principles as had been expressed before. It was proposed to pay ‘“‘all the liabilities of the State according to the terms of the obligation, except so far as the creditors may voluntarily concede more favorable terms.”” Emerson Etheridge was nominated for governor, but declined the nomination, and three weeks later the execu- tive committee substituted E. M. Wight, of Chattanooga. The first convention of the National Greenback party, ever held in the State, assembled at Nashville on August 29, 1878, and nominated E. H. East for governor by acclamation. Only twenty-one counties were represented. An attempt to organize the party had been made two yearsHISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 793 before, but the movement at that time received little support. Early in the canvass Judge Hast withdrew, and was succeeded by Lewis B. Till- man, Sr., of Bedford County. About ten days later he also withdrew, and Col. RB. M. Edwards, of Cleveland, was substituted. While Mr. Ed- wards received a vote of over 15,000, his candidacy did not materially affect the result as between the Democratic and Republican candidates! and Mr. Marks, with a large majority of the Democratic Legislative can- didates, was elected. In accordance with the pledges made during the campaign, the Forty- first General Assembly passed an act for the settlement of the State debt on the basis of 50 cents on the dollar and four per cent interest, upon condition of its ratification by the people at an election to be held in August, 1879. The proposition was thoroughly discussed by able speak- ers throughout the State, but it failed of ratification. The causes of the failure were numerous. ‘The creditors had not signified their will- ingness to abide by the settlement proposed and. under these circum- stances, many considered that to ratify it would be an attempt to force the bond-holders to accept their terms and in a sense would be a partial repudiation ; others contended for a still greater reduction in the debt. Thus at the opening of the campaign in 1880 the settlement of the State debt still remained the chief issue and seriously disturbed the har- mony of the Democratic party. The two factions in that party known as “State credit” and “low tax” had become more determined, and it was evident that the question could be no longer compromised. Two conventions were held. The first, which met on the 8th of June, to appoint delegates to the National Convention, ignored State issues, but the Gubernatorial convention, which assembled at Nashville on August 10, was compelled to frame a platform ; and while the adoption of the pol- icy of either faction would cause a disruption of the party, 1t was felt that to assume an equivocal or uncertain position would be equally fatal. The committee on resolutions presented its reports. The majority re- port contained the following: ‘‘ We recognize the disposition on the part of the creditors of the State, m view of the great losses entailed by the war, in the great depression of business, and in the general shrinkage of values, to make a liberal reduction in both the principal and interest of our bonded indebtedness, and we declare that we favor a prompt settle- ment by the Legislature with our creditors upon the best terms that can be agreed upon as the result of negotiation.” The first minority report presented a resolution similar to the one adopted by the convention in 1878. The second minority report favored the adoption of a plan of settlement, leaving it to be acted upon by the succeeding Legislature,a ena oe apreriaan pane a a > oe ca i ae TT ef eae sa ea soe : “<< A ets Ae re = —— caine a = ~ ie * = iene aa OTE ae eae ee ee . eee rs oe pomp on NE FT SET EL = Sere ES OE NS: PO aa ee pret aatiadees eet Eig damon re Pasa a ciate att clog yee 7 eer geen meng tee aie eh npr to ange meer er Sony simran oa ¥ zee a“ a ar eipomangenions nag a dE ae eee ces = eee onan tip Sim eee see Ser = ee eS Thin meri oneennemnen lena rt te 2. an 794 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. thus giving opportunity for the people indirectly to ratify or reject it, After some discussion-the majority report was adopted. Immediately about 150 delegates, headed by D. L. Snodgrass, withdrew from the con- vention. The proceedings however were continued, and John V. Wright, of Maury County, was nominated for governor. The seceeding delegates met the following day and nominated 8. F. Wilson, of Sumner County. The portion of the platform presented, referring to the State debt, favored the repudiation of all that portion of the alleged indebtedness incurred in aid of railroads and all: the bonds issued for interest aeeru- ing during the war. It was also declared that no settlement should be made that had not first been submitted to the people. The Republican Convention was held on the 5th of May. Alvin Hawkins, of Carroll County, was nominated for governor, and delegates were appointed to the Chicago Convention. The resolutions adopted twe years before were, in substance, reaffirmed. The National Greenback party again nominated Col. R. M. Edwards for governor. Ihe division in the Democratic party resulted in the election of Hawkins and a large number of Republican members of the Legislature, the Senate standing, Republicans, ten; Democrats, fifteen; the House, Republicans, thirty-seven; Democrats, thirty-eight. The Hancock and English electors, however, were elected by a considerable majority, as both factions of the party supported them. One of the first duties of the Forty-second General Assembly, after its organization in January, 1881, was the election of a United States Senator, to succeed James EF. Bailey. A number of nominations were made, but during the early part of the contest Senator Bailey and Gen. William B. Bate received the majority of the Democratic votes, while the Republicans supported Horace Maynard. After twenty-nine ballots had been taken, without an election, Howell E. Jackson, of Madison County, was nominated, and, receiving the support of a large number of Repub- licans, was elected.in the next ballot by a vote of seventy-two to twenty- three for Maynard. The Forty-second General Assembly also made two attempts at effect- ing a permanent settlement of the State’s indebtedness. On April 6, 1831, what was known as the “100-3 act” was passed, and this having been declared unconstitutional, on May 19, 1882, during an extra session, the “60-6” act was substituted. This much vexed question, however, like the ghost of Banquo, would not down, and it was again the leading issue in the campaign of 1882. The Democratic Convention assembled on the 21st of June. —— The schism which had been produced in the party *See Chapter XI,HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 7193 two years before had been so far healed as to permit delegates from both factions to assemble together, and there was a general disposition to com- promise differences. The committee on resolutions presented two reports: The majority report, which was finally adopted, advocated substantially the same plan as was embodied in the act of 1883. This was eoneidered by the most pronounced “State credit’? men as a victory for the ‘‘ low tax” faction, and they withdrew from the convention. “Their number was stinall, in comparison with the entire convention, and the proceedings were continued without interruption, Gen. William B. Bate receiving ite nomination for governor. The “State credit” or “sky blue” fachion which had withdrawn, among whom were John W. Childress, the chair- man of the Democratic Executive Committee, James EH. Bailey, Gen. W. H. Jackson, and several other prominent members of the party, met and decided to call a convention, to meet on the 11th of July, at which time Joseph H. Fussell was nominated for governor. A platform was adopt- ed, which contained the two following planks: Resolved, That we re-affirm the Democratic platform of 1880 on the subject of the State debt, and approve the 60-3-4-5-6, settlement, passed in accordance therewith. Resolved, That we favor the establishment of a railroad commission, to regulate freights and tariff so as to prevent unjust discrimination, with such powers as shall pro- tect the rights of both the people and the railroads. The Republican Convention met at Nashville on April 27, and re- nominated Gov. Hawkins, but no principles which had not been advo- eated before were presented. At the election in November, Beasley received less than 10,000 votes, and Fussell about one-half of that num- ber, while Bate’s majority over Hawkins reached 30,000. The Forty- third General Assembly, the number of members having been increased in 1881, was composed as follows: The Senate—Republicans, 8; Demo- erats 25; House—Republicans, 26; Democrats, 71; Greenbackers, 2. This General Assembly, while it adopted a plan of settlement definitively disposing of the State debt question, introduced another element of discord. The railroad eommission, which was demanded by the ‘State eredit’’ faction, was established, and for various reasons proved highly unpopular. The campaign of 1884 was opened by the Republican Convention, Delegates were appointed to the National T. Ried, of Davidson County, was unan- The administration of the Democratic which was held on April 1%. Convention, and Judge F rank imously nominated for governor. party, both in the Nation and the State, was denounced, and especially was the railroad commission condemned. The Democratic Convention assembled at Nashville on the 18th of June, and nominated Gov. Bate us approved, for re-election by acclamation. The railroad commission Wwé+ ee eee ee aon ~ arte na oh AS” See eT eerie * me ig epee As 2 kil ko ee at lit se Saas LOT a PEI ei au; 1 oo et catia tlt | a4 ! Hy +f) ah i | il ah Sul Beara a5 31} i Hai Wh tad iy baa i i 4) a | i vidi i ef i rid not ie {| i) AY a a Heaney ai an tt aa bil vag if iy ently A i Bea a vata >) ia el aii) “al ee an +d nh iW Facepiece agai 2 eee Sr se sansa h ne sii 2 alia ~~ ao a ee ale ene + ee thei ap, gg SITES 3 . Rael 6 easier prod ot ARSENE att OS SR aa ae Med = een ee Ts eT VT aac aR —— iat - Stas Hees enna = apgeen ra SS ie — : ~ He my ¢ Pevundee Wit Pa Ae a tet Le tie i Ss it 4 : Lt ee yaa A eae ai 4 * iy rH ut Haha | i ‘| Biers au Ab Lt | any real pelted fe ih REEL a ‘ . at | Habe aT ary! Sian eigenen Bl ne ett teen aE Ee Pa etinen a ne ee sangre atm LN 796 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. and the debt settlement was declared to be final. A long debate on the tariff plank took place, and resulted in the adoption of a resolution to support the platform of the National Convention. On May 22, 1884, a prohibition convention was held in Nashyille, which was largely attended by delegates from all points of tlie State. Judge Robert Cantrell was chosen chairman. Jesolutions were adopted favoring a constitutional amendment prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors, to be submitted to a vote of the people. The nomination of a separate ticket, however, was discountenanced. During the campaign the railroad commission was made one of the leading issues, and did much to reduce the Democratic majority, especially upon the State ticket. The majority for Gov. Bate reached about 7,000, while that of 9000. - The next General Assembly repealed the law creating the railroad commission. At the same session the following proposed constitutional amendment to be the Cleveland and Hendricks electors was about Gov. Bate refused his signature, but it passed over his veto. passed upon by the next Legislature, was adopted: No person shall manufacture for sale, or sell, or keep for sale as a-beverage, any in- toxicating liquors whatsoever, including ale, wine or beer. The General Assembly shall by law prescribe regulations for the enforcement of the prohibition herein contained, and shall thereby provide suitable penalties for the violation of the provisions thereof. The Republican Gubernatorial Convention of 1886, met at Nashville on the 16th of June, and nominated Alfred A. Taylor, for governor. A platform was adopted, declaring in favor of National aid to education and a protective tariff, and condemning the existing convict lease-system. The following resolution concerning the proposed prohibitory constitutional amendment was adopted: That the people have the undoubted right to alter, amend, or abolish their constitu- tion or form of government none will dispute; Therefore be it Kesoloed, That the Republican party of the State of Tennessee recognize the right of the people to have the submission amendment voted upon at the ballot box. The Democratic Convention was held on the 11th and 12th of August, and resulted in the nomination of Robert L. Taylor, a brother of the Re- publican nominee for governor. The platform of the Democratic Na- tional Convention was indorsed, a National debt was denounced as a National curse, and it was declared a crime to hoard money in the treas- ury raised by taxation rather than pay it out on the interest-bearing indebtedness of the Government. It favored “the maintenance and im- provement of our system of public schools and the education of all classes of our citizens; and finally advised the submission to a popular vote of the proposed constitutional amendment prohibiting the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquors as a beverage in Tennessee.HAMILTON COUNTY. -] CO =~] Sie VEE ON © @wiNiiye AMILTON COUNTY is situated in the southeastern portion of the State, and is separated from Middle Tennessee by Marion, Se- quatchie and Bledsoe Counties, which bound it on the west. On the north Hamilton County is bounded by Rhea County, on the east by James County, and on the south by the State of Georgia. This county was estab- lished as a separate organization by an act of the Legislature, passed October 25, 1819, as follows: SECTION 1. Be it enacted, etc., that the territory lying southwest of Rhea County, and south and east of Bledsoe and Marion Counties, shall constitute a county by the name of Hamilton in honor andto perpetuate the memory of the late Alexander Hamilton,* late Secretary of the Treasury of the United States. Sec. 2. Beit enacted, etc., that the said county of Hamilton shall be bounded as follows:. Beginning at a point at the foot of Walden’s Ridge of the Cumberland Moun- tains, on the east side thereof; thence running to a point on the Tennessee River, two and a half miles below the lower end of Jolly’s Island, so as to include Patrick Martin in the county of Hamilton; thence south thirty-five degrees east to the southern limits of the State; thence west to the point where Marion County line intersects said western boundary; thence northeastwardly with Marion County line to Bledsoe County line, to a point oppo- site the beginning, and thence to the beginning. Sec. 3. Beit enacted, that for the due administration of justice, the court of pleas and quarter sessions, and the circuit court of the county of Hamilton, shall be holden at such place as shall be designated by Charles Gamble, Robert Patterson and William Lau- derdale until otherwise provided for by law, ete. Section 4 provided that an election should be held on the first Thursday and Friday of the ensuing March, for the purpose of electing field officers for the county, the militia of the county to compose the Sixty-fourth Regiment and part of the Seventh Brigade, and section 6 enacted that Hamilton County should be a part of the same district with Rhea in electing the governor, members of the Legislature, representa- tive to Congress, and a President and Vice-President of the United States. An act was passed November 20, 1821, to the effect that a line running between the counties of Rhea and Hamilton should commence at a point one-half mile below Blythe’s Ferry, and run across the valley to the mountain, so as to run between the lands of Benjamin Jones and John Russell, ‘thence up the foot of the said mountain to the line of said county as now run and marked,” and that the dividing line between Ham- ilton and Marion Counties, should be as follows: * Alexander Hamilton died in 1804, 50ee nl ee / = ; "57 eee ee wie z i 5 ~ : = See eras UTS Ce A ae sient Te os ae Oe ony ie er a mee ote gape ee ie ee oe Sper se © eS oceans Roe ae Te a ae oe x es - _— a“ * _ : — = ~ Sie ~ st \ en ee em eng re er Caen nap ag 8 ean mT aR “ a cpreamigtrte ns weer . a ™ —— Sent CER “te cabbie geet: = ae a ee ae = —— — Pa ae ee nnn , wer ee a ST EAs a om ee = NiagneRew rep fia glad gata rae RR : te ot ce : on A = oLee a == ~ SSS ere See mort Se ee ae — =e ; : Cae . oe ams ORE ah eee tif shite) eel 1 at i | } i Me A a i be sf cf Tet | } i Hy (ad fit ay Ei Ro : Ht ‘| | al ; Hil iT Syn a i: aie ie p eae VHS Biateee ead ; git} ie i if Dae Pare: ay ja 4 iH { Re Ag a | i ah "| Be a 71a { 1 & eit i iba Hi Vie | if i Bae | i . { 1 an tant | i i} a Ht beeene ad earl bat} ay i Hi #54 i thee it 7 ae pti | oi SE al i | i | il ae | ea le ee he CL ae ; Ht i i He oa Hi ae A aH PT EL ‘ i 4 { q gh TR ELETE eA tA hei) | ra id { shi oi ‘ } ; | ; react (te il ti Hl bh Vij Na eel a | ‘1 i i i! Lt | ae ARIE Ail \ | iy Sal ae Vie ead th Wa ned | A EDEL | Ane ; f | | We a ii en i AH WH iat ee any leat e Maus es Gan Hit . ah iets tal | 14 ( any i; | 4 ‘i i [ i } ih | : t i RT TLS TL Sree eaciaciaae ene ae mee eee Is Sere EI a a SE ae Se A RE ee ES: IO8 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ‘“Beoinning on the southeast corner of Bledsoe County, thence along the extreme height of the mountain to the head of Duck Creek; thence down said creek to the mouth thereof; thence due south to the southern boundary of the State. Omitting the laws of 1833 and 1836, an act was passed February 4, 1842. Sections 3 and 4 of which were as follows: Sro. 3. That the first and second sections of “‘an act entitled an act to alter the dividing line between the counties of Marion and Hamilton,” passed February 17, 1836, be and the same is hereby repealed. Sec. 4. That the dividing line between the counties of Marion and Hamilton on the south side of the Tennessee River, as run and marked by the surveyor-general of the Hiwassee District, in pursuance of an act of the General Assembly, entitled ‘‘ an act to extend the laws and jurisdiction of this State to her southern limits;’” Chapter 16, passed November 8, 1833, shall hereafter be and remain the dividing line between said counties. The next change in the county lines was made by an act passed Feb- ruarv 4, 1850, Section 3 of which is as follows: } That the dividing line between Rhea and Hamilton Counties shall be so altered as to commence on a black walnut and hickory on the eastern fork of said creek; thence north seventy-five degrees west to Src. 38. thence forty poles down the creek to a stake; the fork of said creek; thence westwardly with said road to the Bledsoe County line; thence with Bledsoe County line to Rhea County, so as to include Mr. John Gray and Robert Quarls in Rhea County. On the 3d of April, 1881, an act was passed, section 3 of which was as follows: Src. 3. That the county lines between Bledsoe, Rhea and Hamilton Counties, shall be changed so as to attach the lands of James Sladen to Bledsoe County, beginning on the Hamilton County line, where said line crosses the head waters of McGill Creek; thence down the McGill gorge to the corner in the Roberts survey in said gorge; then with the same degree and line of the Roberts survey, running near a point in the old hard road known as the Stoney Battery, to the waters of Roaring River; thence with the waters of said creek to the original county line between Rhea and Bledsoe Counties. A glance at the map will show that while the southern boundary coincides with the thirty-fifth parallel of latitude, none of the other boun- dary lines run east and west or north and south, the western and east- ern lines running in a general northeasterly and southwesterly direction, corresponding mainly with the course of the Tennessee River above Chattanooga, and the northern boundary extending in a northwesterly and southeasterly direction. The area of Hamilton County is 380 square miles, or 248,200 acres. ‘This has been its area since the organization of James County, by which there were taken from Hamilton County four civil districts to be incorporated into James County. The topography of this county is exceedingly varied, the larger por-HAMILTON COUNTY. 799 tion toward the northwest being mountainous and wild, while the valley of the Tennessee River, with the valleys of its tributaries from the north- west, occupies about one-third of the entire area. The principal valleys and ridges have a northeasterly and southwesterly direction. The ele- vation of the Tennessee River, where in its downward course it first touches Hamilton County, is about 700 feet above the level of the sea. The bridge of the Cincinnati Southern Railroad across the Tennessee River about seven miles above the Market Street crossing in Chattanooga is 698 feet above sea level, while low water at the same place is 635 feet above the same level. ‘The signal service barometer bulb in the court- house is 783 feet high. White Oak Mountains occupy a small space in the southeast corner of the county, while Raccoon Mountains extend into Ne the southwest corner. Missionary Ridge commences at South Chickamauga Creek, near the Tennessee River, and rises to the height of about 500 feet above the valley, while on the opposite side of the Tennessee, Wall- den’s Ridge rises to the height of nearly if not quite 1,500 feet above the valley, and Lookout Point, the highest point of Lookout Mountain, in the southwest corner of the county, rises to the height of about 1.600 feet above low water in the Tennessee. The office of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey, at Wash- ington, D. C., kindly furnishes for publication in this work the following data regarding elevations in the vicinity of Chattanooga: Gannett in his Dictionary of Altitudes, gives the elevation of the following points, based upon railroad levels: Knoxville, 900 feet; Loudon, 816 feet; Chattanooga, 684 feet. According to aplane table survey made in 1869, by Assistant Dorr, of this survey, Lookout Mountain, near Summertown, was found to be 1,580 feet above the level of the Tennessee at Chattanooga, which combined with Ellet’s figures (Ellet gives the height of the Tennessee at Chattanooga as 643 feet), gives 9993 feet as the elevation of Lookout Mountain. Assistant Webber computed the altitude of Point Lookout, of the Lookout Mountains, as 2,166 feet. His Gulf point, which is supposed to be on Missionary station, Deadening, which lies on Wallen’s Ridge, at 928.98 meters, equal to 3,048 feet. It isnot known if the points selected as triangulation points are the highest on their re- spective ridges, but they are supposed to be very near the maxima. B. A. COLONUS, Assistant in charge of Office. Ridge, he gives as 2,200 feet altitude. Prof. Buchanan computes the altitude of his The following table, also kindly furnished for publication in this work, by G. B. Nicholson, chief engineer of the Cinc innati Southern Rail way Company, will be found of special interest:HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ELEVATIONS OF STATIONS. Location of Elevation. Sd aa ton ae - = Sars Set = Siiaienaaae — \ hens — tg Se en eset ee Ae — cons Tae _ eet Cone an aoe : = a = - om, er “4 reper = - ed sea einen oa = . oy ea mise oo mrt i am .. ie os “ . ae at ol > i. ; : = 3 in RTT yc es == - " weed P09 eS oe Piemonte me cpa OTA “i paneer wi a =: 7 _ oe = oo hemes oe Rite anes Meg Se. LL EE ny ane = ne aerating me | Sue eae Sa Sm a See 2% aS +t agate mre il mone _ . tp - . Sg ae ae fewign apna page tint eee Te i Se ang MDI pve ca sai nS “se 7 cngnnt>sempeieepintiecnone ay sane cere aae ae vp so, nad Loe pala eel ane oe at i : naa om oi ag : are CSBP ce pe AD NN ar ecient amet a a Stee age ROE: Miles. County. ‘Stations and Other Prom- Feet Above inent Points. Sea Level, 197.7 SCcottaqe ec State lines... c..cu. Kentucky and Tenn. 1350 200.6 SCOttace ces se Waintheldinn sacs. Deputies) era 1323 204.4 Scott Flat Gap..........| Top of Cut......... 1562 904.4 SCOttiee eee Klat Gapy..0.... |) Oph Mein... | 1514 206.5 209.0 SCOtbr oc ee foe es Scott. . Oneida): 5 Summit, South. (highest point on Depot of Nigo Creek... a) line) Top of Tie. . 1445 1519 212.1 SCOL: gan. oes Helenwood........ Depots sh. 425. ss coe 1392 215.7 Scott. - = New Rivera... 4. Depot.. oe 1206 216.0 Soothe ee. New River:....--. Top of Tie onB ridge 1222 216.0 Othe ok INGW: River a... Low water a 1095 919.0 Scottcc wow water 695 297.1 WRC ayn. « - Dayton. :-.--70-.) Depots. sa eis 706 SORIGH |niheaea. «0, |) Graysville... ....-)Oad @rossinp yes: 73 304.0 Elamilton..... -...-| Coulterville:... .....) Depot. 703 306.7 mevamiltone.-<...- -| pale Creek... .. 7406 Sante Road.. 745 309.5 WELAMIULGOM 16h ie EeeLLOre. oe Road Crossing. . yee 738 314.1 Hamilton ..........| Rathburn..........| Nar. Gauge Crossing 782 Slee || RAMIGONS ieee ol AIS Vee eon Rlatiormi. 3... 718 318.0 PHamiltones,.7---. li Welville \ Platiornm:...-) 702 30106 | amiltoneesse ss |) Cave Springs... Springs. iste wists 688 325.6 EVA mMUCON re eter | ELSON say ila ee ere Platiormes 4 6 683 328.5 ) Hamilton... | Leunessee Riven. «| (hop Ob lesa. ae 698 328.5 Hamilton ....:.....]/ Tennessee River ow water... 635 329.3 Hamilton ...-..... .| Kang’s Point: : Depot... 5.5 ceo 4 687 330.4 Hamilton..........| Chattanooga. Market St. Crossing 675 re a ee hk ee Georgia St: ite Line. 4 687 Se eine = —— : LL NT mo ane erama a — ees ea es SS The distances in this table are from mile-post ‘‘O” at the south end of the Ohio River bridge. The principal valleys in this county are the Tennessee, Lookout, Chattanooga, Chickamauga and the Back Valley, the latter lying between Walden’s Ridge and a group of parallel minor ridges. The principal stream is the Tennessee which is about 1,500 feet wide, and is navigableHAMILTON COUNTY. SOL within the county for steamboats all the year. After running between Hamilton and Rhea Counties about fifteen miles, it turns its course to- ward the southwest; and after running in this direction about fourteen miles, it strikes the base of Lookout Mountain, then pursues a northwest course about seven miles, when it breaks through the mountain range at the “Suck,” and then follows a general, winding southwest direction through Marion County into Alabama. The other streams, all tributary to the Tennessee, are Lookout, Chattanooga, Citico and South Chicka- mauga Creeks from the southeast, and the Suck, Mountain, North Chickamauga, Soddy, Possum, Rocky and Sale Creeks from the north- west. The geology of the county is very simple but very interesting, es- pecially in an economical point of view, and although the entire series of formations is not present in this county, yet in describing the formations uh kal or strata that are present, it is necessary to commence very near the Azoic age. The lowest layer, found in the valley lands, is a chazy lime- stone. known in this State as the Knox dolomite, and then follow the Trenton and Nashville limestones in the valleys and Missionary Ridge, all of the above belonging to the Lower Silurian era. Then follow the dyestone or red iron ore in small ridges mainly, and Niagara lime- stone, belonging to the Upper Silurian, the iron ore belonging to the Clinton group. Black shale and St. Louis limestone are found next, belonging to the Devonian age, and last of all come the mountain lime- stone and the coal measures, belonging respectively to the Lower Car- boniferous and Carboniferous eras. The coal measures cap Lookout Mountain. Raccoon Mountain and Walden’s Ridge, in the last two the coal existing in great abundance and being exceedingly valuable for heating and smelting purposes. The veins usually liein a horizontal position, or dipping more or less to the northwest, and varying in thickness from three feet to five feet. In Walden’s Ridge one vein is said to be thirteen feet thick. The iron ore above mentioned crops out near the bases of Walden’s Ridge, of Lookout Mountain and of the Cumberland table-land, the dip of this ore varying trom about twenty-five to nearly forty-five degrees. The strata containing this ore evidently extend, inthe case of each ridge or table-land, entirely under such ridge from valley to valley on either side, the ridge or mountain appearing to have pressed or bent down- ward the strata upon which it rests. and thus to have formed for a per- manent resting place, what geologists term a synclinal trough or valley, causing the edges of the underlying strata to turn up on either side. This ore extends in a northeast and southwest direction from near Bir- = AJ NV a ere een nd on a ar) Seeee oe ae aie Re sar ee ATS ay a a = = ~ Serra Ta ae a a ra ER Te at ANB rh ee eae Se npiscuassinencdegae _ — SSR ‘Seprey te aes att treme a TEE gre PR ARO AN A IOS SER SA tan LET, oe a ea Sa prem Armas me gy ITS —— SSS a eR ee S02 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. mingham, Ala., into and through the Tennessee Valley, in Hast Tennes- see, through Pennsylvania, and into New York State, where the strata containing it are called the Clinton group. At many places it is called dyestone, being occasionally used in dyeing, and is unlike Jimonite; as it occurs in layers, its quantity can easily be determined. At Walden’s Ridge it forms a stratum varying in thickness from eighteen inches to three feet, and is parallel with the slope of the ridge. Missionary Ridge differs in structure from Walden’s Ridge, being formed by outcroppings of the Knox dolomite, its eastern slope and contiguous territory toward the east of the ridge, being covered with flinty masses and gravel. Between Missionary Ridge and Chattanooga, this same dolomite and the Trenton and Nashville limestones form a wide, rolling valley. On the west side of Lookout Mountain, lies Will’s Valley, in which mainly outcrops the same limestones, and, as has been said in another connection, on the west side of this valley the dyestone group again appears. The uplands or ridges are in many places covered with a soil which is thin and poor, but which is less affected by drought than would naturally be supposed. ‘This soilis well adapted to grazing and is capable of be- ing fertilized to almost any desired richness. ‘he first bottom lands are alluvial, with clay subsoil, and very valuable if drained and supplied with alkali. The second bottom lands are in some places of a clayey loam, in others of a sandy loam, and all either are or can be made ex- ceedingly productive. As may be seen by the table given below, the climate is, generally speaking, mild and equable, the extremes of more northern and southern latitudes not being experienced. The natural products of the forests are greatly varied. Oak grows nearly all over the county, and other kinds of timber are the ash, black ralnut, beech, birch, cherry, red cedar, cypress, hickory, maple, holly, iron- wood and locust, and white and yellow poplar abound. The short-leaf yel- low pine is also found at the base of Raccoon Mountain, in Lookout Valley, on Soddy Creek, on Missionary Ridge and on the top of Walden’s Ridge. It is of great value for bridge and car building, for flooring and joists and for interior finish and decorations, but does not work so easily as the long- leat yellow pine of Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi. Timothy and other varieties of herdgrass, as also clover, grow luxuriantly; corn, cot- ton, wheat, potatoes, both Irish and sweet, broom corn, sorghum and to- bacco, grow to perfection, and are cultivated with suecess. Garden veg- etables of all kinds, and horticultural products, with the exception of the apple, find here a congenial atmosphere, and especially the grape, with the modified exception of the Catawba, the older vines of this variety being‘ % : cs i nut Setiry HAMILTON COUNTY. 803 subject to oidium or mildew; but the Concord is most healthy and pro- ductive, and best adapted to this latitude. So far, however, agriculture is but indifferently or rather poorly conducted. Fertilizing 1s not ap- preciated at its true value; too much of the land is farmed by renters; deep cultivation and rotation of crops are too seldom practiced, and up- start weeds are permitted to grow to an inordinate extent and hight. It is probable and is believed to be true that the first to settle in this part of the country were mainly Scotchmen, and that they came here almost immediately after the close of the Revolutionary war. Some of their names are here inserted: Daniel Ross, Daniel McNair, Daniel Mc- Coy, Joseph Coody, Joseph Martin, Dick Taylor, Fox Taylor, Mr. Adair, Mr. Lowrie, Mr. McPherson and Mr. McDonald. Most of these married Indian wives and became incorporated into the Cherokee Nation. Daniel Ross married a half-breed Indian woman and became by her the father of John Ross, the Cherokee chief, who built the house at Rossville, Ga.., now occupied by Thomas McFarland: of Lewis Ross, who, had it not been for his high cheek bones and straight, black hair, could not have been distinguished from a white man: of Andrew Ross; of Eliza Ross, a very beautiful and accomplished woman, who married a Scotchman and went to Scotland to live; and of the wife ot Joseph Coody, who for a long time lived on the old Daniel Ross farm near the base of Lookout Mountain. and there carried on a cleer skin tannery. The reader will remember that by the act of the Legislature organizing the county, the boundary line was so run ‘“‘as to include Pat- rick Martin in the county of Hamilton” and that “the court of pleas and quarter sessions and the circuit court of the county of Hamilton shall be holden at such place as shall be designated by Charles Gamble, Robert Patterson and William Lauderdale until otherwise provided for by law.” It would seem reasonable to conclude theretore, notwithstand- ing the testimony of certain old settlers to the contrary, especially with reference to Patrick Martin and William Lauderdale, that all of these four persons were here previous to October 25, 1819. Robert Patterson came to this county as early as 1807. and settled on North Carolina grant No. 93 and Charles Gamble, who had been deputy sheriff in Rhea County, came to Hamilton in 1816, settled on the Tennessee River near the mouth of Sale Greek, and after the organization of the county became its first sheriff, and it is stated on apparently sood authority that the first sheriff’s sale was conducted near this creek, from which circumstances the creek received its name. . ; s ° . Oe: 7 Ae ATA rar ©) ; € ee At the time of the organization of the county there were 821 inhab itants, 766 of whom were whites, thirty-nine slaves and sixteen free7 ceeceeereapeionmnennetneny sae garonibettae si alenpepeneeaanenT se Te BT gs ohana See aeae apg oi as Bee ns ay seme NE Soy = ar apa ma i c ne, chow onl oat ce eee Tiree eee eng Es = ei —-- Se = eS AL cn ppl career i marca In tn sar ine eT re ar ee a ee pope) ene : _ — a me, <= ml = x “ a ay - + " = — << . — ~ sates at see —T Fs AR ES ose wen 2 : ea: an - ~~ ee =: “< — eh ~ see se + - ~ - c~ Beg 7 we ee ae a ~ - = at rc vt a an v m" ia sit ~ i _ nares “ rn ~ woarene - gl ics aca = my as * ie = —~ Se ve ane Ii MEETS ATES ES. LE AMIS FITC eas vow a oe _ a ~ Sear Lex = soatimat i rn. Pea SPEIRS = Dieta! as ior me al —_ ae = aan ~ a — a me ~ + ~ te —_— ees - 3 ~ < = tm = ey. . Son een - - : ee ~ ¥ = 7 a —" ; iain ae : is ois ee were a - ; ‘ —— - = eaten mealies eae e- Det = 7 —— - brn: 8 r sage —_ a “ mimes So saiiinaaalelipotag ane eet ee cinee = aL ba iene ‘ Pee ee Ee on = Sane af tay SN | Rape ef . ma Se ae : ee se “ “ 7 oot pert ance a = =. oo = res - mip Perbigres” Sas. a ee no eee iaiad rs Rati abiicianndeare sea “= = — Saat 7 A a na oi 2 Nae Pra ae siciniciilitiph 3S ine sr-ae ae —— pie me = — “ asthenia RET ae - —_ a — a’ =~ - a pikes as: a cs chin stearate ~ ~ ae Se - : = ~ — ¥ = . ee ee == = — ~~ ~ - ae iz zaeee — = : ~ 2 Se r. a Fai ay ke a — ~ ~ eet 2 ~ -- Te Ar SS PCNA ae . — “ ¢ sie = ers ~ a Otte" ana NET a2 Sees es us st Sacaeal Sane ee en a cata sed CH — ene sere a Seer eS ES — pane paeste SS ee — ae a i en Fee = aan enna eee aa we — = = BSc es oe Tae Se a — Sohn eitatoaee ee ae Ex : aera ans iba reer: Sentient tte tt Gagne tana! vA Ae aah at caterer 804. HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. colored persons; hence it would be impracticable even if it were desirable to introduce a complete list of these early settlers. A portion only of the names of these, such as are now remembered or as appear on the county records can be given. Hasten Poe was one of these, and it was at his house, still standing (1886), not far from Melville Station on the Cincinnati Southern Railway, where the first term of the circuit court was held, having been selected by the commissioners, Gamble, Patterson and Lau- John Poe, his grandson, now owns the old place, from near which Poe’s road. formerly ‘‘ Poe’s Turnpike,” passes over Walden’s Ridge. From Mr. Poe’s derdale. Mr. Poe came to this county in 1818 and died in 1878. house, known in early times as ‘‘ Poe’s tavern,” the courts were transferred to that of Asahel Rawlings, who came to this county in 1817, and who had settled near the present site of ‘‘ Old Dallas,” Dallas having become by law the county seat. Nimrod Pendergrass settled on the Tennessee, about one mile above the mouth of Opossum Creek, in 1817 or 1818. having come from Rhea County. In about 1819 or 1820 James Smith came from Kentucky and settled also near Opossum Creek. James Cozby, with his sons, Woods and Robert, came to this county about the time the Cherokees were moved to the southside of the Tennessee, and in 1820 bought the place formerly owned by the Cherokee chief, James Brown, about ten miles above Chattanooga on the North Chickamauga. Andrew Johnson came early and still lives some distance above Hixson. William McGill came from Knox County, probably before the organi- zation of the county, and lived near Robert Patterson. John Hanna came from Virginia in 1820, and lived on what was known as the Wallace farm. John Brown, James Varner and Gilbert Vandegriff were alsoearly settlers, as was Nathan Shipley whose father was killed by Mitchell, near Joseph Paine’s. Preston Gann and George Sawyers came about the same time and lived below what is now Hixson Station. They were neighbors of Ephraim Hixson, who came to Hamilton County from the Sequatchie Valley in 1830. John Russell was a very early settler and lived near Sale Creek. Thomas Coulter was here before 1820, for then he was dealing in lands. William Rogers lived near the present Coulterville, as did James McDonald, whose widow is now living at Benjamin Mc- Donald’s. This family are descendants of the celebrated Scottish chief, Roland McDonald. Elisha Rogers was one of the early settlers as waS Jacob Hartman. Hugh, James and David Cunningham lived on Mountain Creek, near Daniel Sciveley. One of Jacob Hattman’s grants from the State was so located that one of its boundary lines crossed a branch of Mountain Creek ‘ at the place where Hugh Cunningham was drowned.” Daniel Sciveley lived north of the Tennessee, near Walden’s Ridge.HAMILTON COUNTY. 805 Thomas R. Russell was the first surveyor the county had, and judging from his work he was an educated and competent surveyor, as his lines can now be readily found and followed. George Williams was a very early settler living near the “Suck.” Henry Rogers lived two and a half miles above Hixson; Joseph Rogers who came into the county in 1831 built a grist-mill on North Chickamauga Creek. David Beck, orand- father of the present county register, came to the county with his family of thirteen children in 1822, and Beryl Smith, who lived one-half mile below Hixson, came into the county in 1830, John Friar coming also about the same time. Abraham Thomas was a later comer, having lived originally in Virginia. He then moved to Bledsoe County, and finally to Georgetown, in what is now James County, in 1837, one year alter John P. Long, at present the oldest living resident of Chattanooga, came to Hamilton County. Thomas Shirley, now living at the age of ninety in James County, came to Dallas at a very early day, and is probably the oldest of the early settlers of Hamilton County now living. In the early part of the century John Walling with a posse of men, among whom were a Mr. Warren and a Mr. Green, came from Virginia to what is now Hamilton County, in pursuit of Indians who had captured and carried away as prisoners two white women. The posse overtook the Indians and recaptured the women on what is now generally called “ Walden’s Ridge,” but which is sometimes named, as originally, ‘‘ Wall- ing’s Ridge.” Mr. Walling and his posse, after the recapture of the women, built a kind of fort on this ridge, which they occupied for some days, until, supposing the Indians had become reconciled to the loss of their captives, they returned home and restored the women to their friends. The Indians, however, followed and killed Mr. Walling while he was plowing in his field. From this circumstance the ridge was named originally ‘ Walling’s Ridge.” In some unknown way the name was subsequently corrupted into ‘“Wallen’s Ridge,” and it is now so known in some of the departments at Washington; and still later by another orthographical tergiversation it became © Walden’s Ridge.” It is believed, however, that B. B. Cannon, who was county surveyor trom 1830 to 1837, is responsible for this last form of the word, as it is always spelled ‘“‘ Walden’s” by him in his survey; and if this supposition be cor- rect he was not without reason for its application, for a part of the old Walling family spell their name “Walden,” but the majority adhere to the original form, Walling. A very large grant of land was made in 1795 by North Carolina to Stockley Donelson in what is now Hamilton County. Nominally it was for 20,000 acres, but its boundaries as described contained within theiree apap Angas como ign ame pacnce et en apa A git rt ene TE aon nace een TLDS Si insta ite i : ~ Sasi $ RE a . ; — me = = erent es " ones red ae am = PRCT LET Tet aie SESS ae rage <————: = = - = , -— — = as as ma Sua —- a _ ea ER SE : ae c Joe aaa 23 ehien > o ae ort Sees me a er cl tn si gna sea aoa as ee oo aa aie amperes = a ace tg ne waa cn a IRI eer a ni ct a — —ainegaae em - a e je a Se a OR, por Ta eS aa a [cesar eee . == ‘ ihilenpncitioved igs Gla egal io — ee Pecan entra anna ad Hcy eR ee eS uae re - : = ; = ro A = ne en a : Senter te : ean asceanaianpe er Se nena — eae sare ay met nen ars: ae 806 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. limits nearly 150,000 acres. This grant extended from the mouth of Richland Creek in Rhea County to the mouth of North Chickamauga Oreek, on what was then supposed to be the line between North Carolina and Georgia; up North Chickamauga Creek to the Cumberland Mount- ains (that branch now known as Walden’s Ridge); thence along that ridge to Richland Creek, to a point where Dayton now stands, and thence down that creek to the beginning. Langdon Carter’s grant was made in 1795, and Robert Patterson in about 1807 bought 300 acres of this grant lying on what is now known as Opossum Creek, then Mill Creek, and previously, Deep River, and so designated on grants and title papers. Mr. Patterson settled on his purchase about that time and resided thereon until after the extinguishment of the Indian title in 1819, when he was dispossessed in the following manner: In about 1821 Wiliam B. Carter and other heirs of Langdon Carter brought suit against Robert Patterson for the recovery of the land, founding their title upon a 640-acre grant to Langdon Carter, their father. In Hamilton County Mr. Patterson was so popular that the Carter heirs feared justice would not be done them there, and hence took a change of venue to Khea, where they prevailed over Patterson, who thereupon moved a short distance above, and the place thus given to the Carters was occupied until within a few years by John Hughes. I'he names of other early settlers with the approximate dates of their arrival in the county follow in connection with recorded land grants and deeds. ‘The first deed registered in what are now the Hamilton County records was one by which Stockley Donelson conveyed to Charles Me- Clung 640 acres for $200. The land was described as being “‘in the east- ern district on the north side of the Tennessee River, on the first big creek above the mouth of Chickamauga Creek, called by some North Chickamauga, beginning some distance below a very large spring on the south side of the creek at a post oak and red oak trees and blazed black oak, running thence east 226 poles, crossing the spring branch at 24 poles; thence north 453 poles; thence west 226 poles, and thence south 453 poles to the beginning.”’ This deed was dated October 23, 1799, and recorded April 11, 1820. Then follow five other deeds from Stockley Donelson to Charles McClung, all dated in July, 1797, each for 640 acres, except one for 600 acres, the price for the 600 acres being $100; for two ot the 640-acre tracts, $107 each; for one, $150, and for the other, $200. Then follows the record of a grant, No. 166, by North Carolina to John Hackett for 600 acres of land for the consideration of £10 for each 100 acres, the grant being signed by “Richard Caswell, Esq., Governor, Cap- tain-General and Commander-in-Chief,”’ September 20, 1787. ThenHAMILTON COUNTY. S07 follows a deed signed by John Hackett, by which, on the same day, he conveyed to Richard Bearden this same grant, No. 166, together with 800 acres adjoining for $1,000. The first quit-claim deed registered was by James Cozby to Joseph Dunham, of a tract of land “ lying in the east- ern district on the north side of the Tennessee, a small distance above the Suck, and being a part of the 20,000 acres granted by the State of North Carolina to Stockley Donelson, No. 283, and dated July 20, 1795, and being the same land that John Hackett conveyed to Joseph Dunham February 23, 1809.” This quit-claim deed was dated February 24, 1809. The above were all before the organization of Hamilton County. The first deed registered after said organization was dated February 23, 1821, and by it Richard Timberlake conveyed to James Brown a tract of land on North Chickamauga Creek of 640 acres for $3,000. The first bill of sale recorded was by Jacob Roberson to John Brown for two negroes, one a woman named Elizabeth, about thirty-five years old, and the other a boy, named Joseph, about four years old, for $600, under date of May 6, 1820. The second was by John Russell to John Brown. under date of December 9, 1815, for two negroes, one a woman thirty years old, named Aney, the other a cirl, Erager, twelve years old, for 8530. Still earlier than this John Russell sold to John Brown, De- cember 13, 1808, a negro boy, twenty-two years old, named Peter, for $500, and on the 19th of the same month John Brown bought of ‘ Robert Brown, of the Cherokee Nation.” a “male slave by the name of Cyrus,” for $600. Robert Brown made his mark, as did also Susanna Brown, November 29,1817, to a similar instrument, by which she conveyed to John Brown. for the consideration of $500, a yellow boy about fifteen years of age, by the name of Moses. ° According to the records John Brown appears to have been the principal slave buyer of those early days. At the time of the arrival of the first settler in what is now Hamilton County the entire county was occupied by the Cherokees, but so far as is now ascertainable there were but few if any of these old settlers, who were slain by the red man’s tomahawk or spear. The warlike spirit of the Cherokee, originally as fierce as that of any other Indian, had become to a great extent subdued by long eontact and numerous disastrous con- flicts with the superior skill of his white brother, who, though an intruder, was determined and destined to possess the soil. Though in the opening years of the nineteenth century this part of the Tennessee Valley was singularly free from hostile encounters, there had been pre- had for its objective point a viously an expedition undertaken, which more famous, in the military locality already famous, and since made al eT a 1 | bs] ij Fi | i A _oT: San i ceneeranenin ee ee A maesT Tere ana > fen Sele ‘sR Ping A: ~ POLO RS SR aS aS ee en em Se ee ete = Sy ST gE ab SB Clyro a wi Par ae és watt tS u = - = 2 a a i Bey Pen d (1 Vi aed a S Te iene aE abi ita i eee HH ant Ee ? At 4 fl i { : Pen eA Her Gate Pet PMT Me ME BR BH: §. ris tf yl } a a rt Ni aS) Hr Hl] PAW | a ae \ Ht H wt) | ei Rett We en hea ny ae a ee ee ——— ne ee 5 an Ra LIEN LTTE So aca cee eT SO8 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. annals of the country. This was the expedition of Cols. Evan Shelby and. John Montgomery against the irrepressible Chickamaugas, whose town, Chickamauga, was nearly a mile in length and extended up and down Chickamauga* Creek a few miles above its mouth. This expedition, which, under the pilotage of a Mr. Hudson, came down the Tennessee, in 1779, entered the Chickamauga Creek, and, disembarking on its bank, aptured an Indian, whom they compelled to guide them to the town. The Chick- amaugas were taken so completely by surprise that, making no resist- ance, they fled to the fastnesses of the hills and mountains, and were pursued. The number of the Indians thus attacked was about 500. They were commanded by the chiefs, Dragging Canoe and Big Fool, and were equal in numbers to the expedition under Shelby and Montgomery. Pursuit was made, a camp broken up on Laurel Creek, and Little Owl’s The troops of Shelby and Montgomery were the first white men that had seen the rich lands of the Tennessee Valley, in what are now the counties of Hamilton, Rhea, Roane and Knox, and were the first to spread glowing accounts of their Town and other towns taken and burned. fertility and beauty; the consequence being that almost immediately a strong current of immigration was turned toward and into this fair and inviting region. Subsequently to this expedition against the Chickamaugas, a battle was fought on Lookout Mountain between the Indians, commanded by the great chief Wynca on the one side, and Tennessee volunteers com- manded by Gen. John Sevier, on the other. This was the first battle of Lookout Mountain of which there is any record or tradition, and was fought in 1782, Gen. Sevier being, truce and a surrender of prisoners as usual, victorious, compelling a and slaves. The second battle of Lookout Mountain was fought in 1788 by Gen. Joseph Martin, with Col. Robert Love commanding a regiment from Washington County, Col. Kennedy from Greene County and Col. Doherty from lower down. The forces under these officers were. fired upon from every cranny and cliff and tree; three of their captains—Hardin, Fuller and Gibson—were killed, and Capt. Thomas Gibson wounded. the famous Nickajack expedition, an account of which may be found in the general history, on page 97. Until after the Hiwassee purchase, made in 1818, the Cherokees con- tinued to live on both sides of the-‘Tennessee River, but in 1819, accord- ing to the terms of the treaty under which the above named purchase was made, they moved to the south side of that river, and the north side was left to the exclusive occupancy of the white man. The territory This was six years before *Chickamauga means * dull, sluggish stream,” according to John P, Long.- ss on nies HAMILTON COUNTY. 809 south of the Tennessee was then occupied by the Cherokees until 1838, when, under the provisions of the treaty of New Echota,* made by the Rev. J. F. Schermerhorn with a small fraction of the tribe, this portion of their lands was wrested from them. The Rev. Mr. Schermerhorn was selected by President Jackson to make this treaty by reason of his many previous successes as a treaty-maker among the Indians of the North- west. In 1829 a fraudulent treaty had been forced upon the Choctaws by United States commissioners appointed for that purpose, and now those of the Cherokees who did consent to this treaty of New Echota did so under the conviction that removal, even if resisted and postponed, was ultimately inevitable, and that those who should first remove to their new home west of Arkansas would have numerous advantages over those who should move last. But while this treaty of New Echota was a sham and a fraud, yet there were many good reasons and some peculiar ones for desiring the removal of the Cherokees at that time. The nation, consist- ing of about 18.000 individuals, was entirely surrounded by white people, the lower stratum of which race was gradually but surely ruining the young men of the tribe by teaching them the vices of gambling and the use of intoxicating drinks, and was as certainly bringing the young women to ruin by inducing them to the crime of prostitution, and thus was threatened the destruction of the entire nation. Far west of the Mississippi they would be, for years at least, comparatively free from contaminating connection with these vices and crimes—these tantalizing sarcasms upon elvilization. The Rev. Mr. Schermerhorn made proclamation to the effect that he would meet the Cherokee nation at New Echota and with them make a treaty for their lands: but it was not until after the third attempt was made that this gospel messenger succeeded in getting up a treaty, and then in the absence of several of the head men of the Nation, who had gone to Washington to confer directly with the President and Secretary of War. The Cherokees were at that time divided into two parties, known respectively as the Ridge party and the Ross party. John Ridge, son of Maj. Ridge, and John Ross were the respective chiefs of these parties. The Ridge party, though numerically much the smaller, was in favor of removal and in favor of the treaty, while the Ross party was al- most if not quite unanimously and very strongly opposed to the removal. This was especially the case with the young men, from whom the white settlers for some time, both before and atter the conclusion of the treaty, expected warlike demonstrations, and whom it was exceedingly difficult for the old men to restrain. Through the wise counsels of the old men, *New Town.ae ee ey eae ag r pee ee Sos 7 sprrearnent 3 naleamaay ox 3 o 7 ee - ES < % ; Sakata me FT a se ata eres ws Fare eae oe a SS Sey ATTY ets Mim net ni NE SiR i tat A i en RA St a len Cee eee anes 2 eens be ler nam = cent —— nee = Ni EA x —ldainonennmanase acre Len ani eS nie a LET AS Sars a 810 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. however, peace was maintained. The proportion of the Ridge party to the Ross party was about as 440 to 17,800, which numbers reveal in the clearest light the fraudulent nature of the “treaty” which was made in December, 1835, with the Ridge portion of the Nation and _ bitterly Op- posed by the Ross portion. ‘These numbers are arrived at in the follow- ing manner: President Jackson, because of John Ross’ opposition to the treaty, determined if possible to weaken his influence with his na- tion. and thus render them more tractable and facilitate their remoyal. With this object in view, some time after the ratification of the treaty, he caused to be called a convention of the tribe to decide upon a pro- posed change in the method of paying to them their annuities; that is to say whether the Government should continue to pay these annuities to the secretary of the council, who should also continue to apportion them out to the heads of families, or whether in future the Government agent should pay the respective shares directly to the heads of families. Chief toss advised his people not to attend the convention; but notwithstand- ing this advice about one-half the voting population of his party attend- ed, together with the entire voting population of the Ridge party. The vote upon the question having been taken, it was found that 110 votes had been cast in favor of the President’s proposition and 2,225 against it. The voting population of the Ross party was therefpre about 4,450, and of the Ridge party 110, and assuming that including women and children there were four members of the tribe to each voter, the entire number of the Ridge party is found to be 440, and of the Ross party 17,300. The treaty was made, according to the New American Cyclopedia, with three chiefs and about 600 men, women and children, and according to the Rey. W. Willey, with sixty men and no chiefs. The three chiets who had sold their nation came to an untimely end. Ma}. Ridge was waylaid and shot, John Ridge was taken from his bed and cut to pieces, and Elias Boudinot was decoyed from his house and slain with hatchets and knives. John Ross and his friends expressed the deepest regret at these barbarities, and the United States officers scoured the country for the murderers in vain. The announcement having been made that the treaty had been rati- fied,* the Ridge party soon began to make preparations for removal, and before the two years of grace expired were safely settled in their new home; but the Ross party continued to struggle peacefully for their rights. In the winter of 1836—37 an effort for a new treaty was made, and in July, 1837, a delegation was chosen to visit Washington at the opening of the next Congress, and lay their cause before that body. This case, sustained *The ratification occurred May 23, 1836.HAMILTON COUNTY. Sit by the signatures of almost the entire Cherokee Nation, and by numerous remonstrances from citizens of the United States, was presented in a most lucid and able manner, but no substantial modification of the treaty was ever effected. Still the Ross party could not believe that a treaty so iniq- uitous and oppressive would be carried into effect; and, acting under the advice of their great chief, made no preparations to go, simply waited to be removed, or rather made preparations to remain, as when, on the 23d of May, 1838, the soldiers under command of Gen. Winfield Scott, began to gather them in trom their cherished homes to the rendezvous, their grounds had been planted for a larger crop than usual. ‘The atti- tude of the entire tribe in this to them sorrowful emergency is well illus- trated by that of a single individual, John Benge, a full blooded Cherokee Indian, who said that even then, when the time under the treaty had come to go, he would not move one step of his own accord: but that if a United States musket was presented, and he ordered to go, even though the mus- ket were held and he ordered to move by a boy but ten years old, he would unresistingly obey. As a general thing in order to eollect the Cherokees at the rendezvous, the lower end of Missionary Ridge near Rossville, it was necessary for the troops to quietly surround a portion of the tribe during the night, and the next morning bring to the appointed place all those thus surrounded, and even then it was always found that portions of families were absent, having either purposely gone away to such distances as not to be surrounded, or having evaded the detachments of troops so sent out, in order if possible to remain, instead of going with the rest of the tribe west of the Mississippi River. At length, atter much difficulty and the exercise of much patience by the soldiers, about one-half of the Ross party were collected and for the most part loaded on flatboats and floated off down the Tennessee, others being marched over- land. Owing to the lateness and increasing heat of the season, the other half were permitted to remain until the ensuing fall, when under a contract to that effect made by John Ross with the United States Government, Mr. Ross himself led them to their new reservation in the Indian Territory. One of the incidents of the removal worthy of preservation is the fol- lowing: A small party of Indians, consisting of Chief Bushyhead, his. wife and their daughter and a young man, were coming through Rossville Gap in Missionary Ridge toward the rendezvous. The daughter becoming conscious of the immediate approach of an important epoch in her history, the young man was sent forward to the store at Rossville to await the coming of the rest of the little party. Upon arriving at the store the young brave was questioned as to when Bushyhead would arrive, and gave for reply that he would be at the store in about an hour, as he and= . PER STM : We] = 4 = oe ee ca an a= " E ; se z: = NT aplasia took - So ons casi ie RT Al aa ent 5 IE ee - 1 ™ Pray Meeps , = = — pee Sawing 5 a Eee ae ne, anes Geeaieeeitns ems ie ee - or lag ne in ee a ee te oe Set re ten act ares earache Meter a _—— se 5 chon re B Dy ag Sm cara. Siemans = MEE TB: pee Se : wae ce iia Spee ge page nn eeommmramar yf naa asap haaieeer fy eS ee = - ‘hpi = sci cs a a OR ne we eS 5 a Mc pata. = a» SSS ae ee ‘e eae wm oeaee CE a ee z ~~ F aa ae a see ae — SF Ee gz ne te aS, ~— - = ahs Sis Dita tm ie - w ee Poe enarat eae eee ss oe 7 ——— ~- ——— - =—— > ; oe E Sr ene Ree aS TIS ea a Seana arrenen a a ea eT sen eS nema 3 812, HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. his wife had simply remained in the timber with their daughter until she should be delivered of her expectant heir. In about an hour the remain- ing three, their number now increased to four, appeared in front of the store, the old peopte walking, the newly made mother riding upon a very poor and sharp-backed pony, apparently as unconcerned as if nothing unusual had occurred, and the newly born infant being tenderly carried and cared for in the arms of its grandmother. After remaining at the store a few minutes to purchase some calico or gingham out of which to make a new suit for the new comer, the young woman not having mean- while alighted from her pony, the little party, Chief Bushyhead, his wife, daughter, grandson and the young brave, proceeded to the rendezvous. where to this narrative they are lost to view. Missionary Ridge, made famous in later years by being the scene of one of the most important battles of the civil war, derives its name from having been the scene of the benevolent and pious labors of missionaries sent out to the Cherokees by the American Board of Commissioners for This mission on the ridge was established in 1817 on the south bank of Chickamauga Creek. The first missionaries to Foreign Missions. arrive were the Rev. Cyrus Kingsbury, a recent graduate from Andover Theological Seminary, the Rey. Ainsworth E. Blunt, and the Rey. John Vail. The mission being established was named Brainerd Mission, in honor of the Rey. David Brainerd, a celebrated American Missionary to the The Rey. Loring S. Williams, accom- panied by Moody Hall, arrived from New York State in March, 1817, a The Secretary of War had been authorized by President Madison to instruct the Indian Agent to erect a schoolhouse, and a house for the teacher to be followed by others as occasion might require. Indians. who died in 1747. few weeks after the arrival of Mr. Kingsbury. The mission thus established was a compound of mission, boarding-school and agricultural college, and to The government contractor failed to build the houses ordered by the President, and the missionaries themselves were soon busily engaged in making conduct it imposed upon the missionaries immense labor and care. brick, burning lime, digging cellars and a well, and in conveying their corn meal a distance of forty miles. Houses being erected it then became a matter of economy to erect a mill in which to grind corn, and hence the erection of ‘Missionary Mill,” on the west bank of Chickamauga Creek. T’o obtain water with which to propel the machinery of this mill, they dug a race three-fourths of a mile long to Spring Creek. The race though not in use is visible to the present day. The school estab- lished here for the education of the Indian youth was a great success, often having present at the same time 500 scholars. At the expl-’eoneeenanpesane tem et TE es TP OE Ey ee aw Tope ang nate pe acne sine are eS Sigs oF = rear: Tee “ weg as er te a 3 Kant 2a cccpevertts tet trie pein ng ay ee (er ON eawinccnpers apo alps ennai “ste = eer res -= — = = coer a = ° EN 7 2 3 = - mals 2 - x < = cates saa my asf ro x RIS Siac RTS TOLLE DTT parry Se ae - at = _ = . . , : eens a eS ecentiiiene . f at Sy orm ass < v7 —_ ~ oO AO ow et saan “ contin See + At ae a = aa eee diane aascdbtigiaitnigniend isLegeetiemeinted aL geen ae — ae ‘ Sra erp ries so a 2 ras sae dkdpateneanes oan T- >. = SS =e a = ; se es - ‘ : - - ee a = “ on a re sence Tina aes nae i signe aan — ee ~ . . a : eae ~ as 2 - =. = ar ee eee aE Soe x ga a Eee fs see ai ig OEE zit nee i e , : ; ee ; - : ee een 7 sg Tar ees 2 . be wea nape ic i i = a e ~ - Sa snes ies postal en I te cm eee eee iad a a se ae heonrecnesa ae eS a a FT ance : et, eine pee pee Pa fs Se art sl Des Eir Saat —, oe = reer i mm ———— Se Gpna nn ‘hair rm ad Tc comune denen ements prem pealse Lg ee sare =HAMILTON COUNTY. $13 ration of about eighteen months the Revs. Kingsbury and Williams were transferred to the Choctaws in Mississippi, where they remained nineteen years. Mr. Kingsbury was succeeded by the Rey. Ard Hoyt, the Revs. Mr. Blunt and Mr. Vail remaining with Mr. Hoyt upon the Ridge. After the death of the Rey. Mr. Hoyt his place was filled by the Rev. Mr. Ellsworth who after the treaty of New Echota went West with the Ross party, Rev. Mr. Blunt settled down upon the ‘Blunt farm,” whence he removed to Dalton where he died since the war. On the 27th of May, 1819, President Monroe, accompanied by Gen. Gaines, appeared unannounced at the door of the mission. He expressed him- self as well pleased with all he saw, and ordered erected at the public expense a better schoolhouse for the girls. The mission was conducted until the removal of the Cherokees in 1838, the Lord’s Supper being celebrated for the last time at Brainerd, August 19, 1838. The postoffice at Rossville was established in 1827, James Coody being commissioned postmaster April 28. His successor was N. D. Scales, commissioned July 28, 1832. This postoffice was changed to Brainerd, February 6, 1834, when John C. Ellsworth became postmaster. Ainsworth E. Blunt was commissioned September 17, 1836, and the post- office was discontinued February 20, 1838. The mission property consisting of 160 acres of land _ to- gether with the buildings, was sold by the Rev. John Vail to Thomas Crutchfield, and by him in 1852 was sold to Philamon Bird, who built a larger mill on the site of Missionary Mill, which since then has borne the name of ‘“ Bird’s Mill.”” Mr. Bird constructed a dam across Chickamauga Creek, thus rendering useless the Missionary race. At this mill there are now three run of buhrs, a bolting apparatus and a saw mill, the capacity of the water-wheels being equal to seventy-five horse power. The old’ missionary house much reduced in size 1s now occupied by S. H. Bird, son of Philamon Bird, who died in 1871, and a frame church building known as ‘The Brainerd Church ” stands about half a mile to the westward of the mill. In the old Mission Cemetery near the mill, now nearly overgrown with weeds and cedar trees is a small monument bearing the following inscription: “Here lie the remains of Samuen Worcester, D. D., pastor of the Tabernacle Church, Salem, Mass., and first Secretary of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions: born in 1770 and died June 7, 1821.” His remains were afterward removed to Massachusetts for permanent sepulture. The Rey. Loring S. Williams, mentioned above, writing from lowe SI rs ae!— -~ Seis Cobar eces aaa so: » ast age ea a ea TARY TOE REE a Se ahs oe Sates mage abi = <= in anew = ate haere ee Sac ce ar a cere ook ——. rite Be ie er TINE ET ee ee ae att | ETE eae " ™ 7" snieeetcosanant comes ae. —. ia SL ee Bio semeapcipai coe ste SL Von aaa Ge ipaengies tht ela OR eG AT RES = Si fan m ment discovered that Negley had fallen back to Stevens’ Gap. Thus , failed the design on Gen. Thomas corps, and Gen. Bragg, still pursuing his original purpose of attacking and defeating the Union Army 10 detail : : a AG se ee x before it could concentrate, on the evening of the 12th, ordered Gen.See ol wae ae spin Eb oats — Aenea ee EBLE RT FGA a OO en ee ee So San ae ees ——- - ———— i tacogo linn Ages per onme mee ee rare et aaa aie: ok cig eo rag eg apg PN aint Gr nents aay ireenereetatewnlaee en he fa pn ita ie pe ee ee li oo = ~ NET T Soe ig NE A nd eps ert rg nS Se TE Ran or ele nee narieenchmasiinentne eum re emt Ah ee Antoni NGAI mene a = a cont a a aS ee : armen enorme. *} = ethane omen - ars : = = aaa od aera A fan 4 : : : ores ss sei ~ ae Jatinatiaegtor eres z . = agape: SS ee te Tae Tree NT ama BRT, ss ar “ % . Sear naar es ON = - ' oad a = + - = memtiickd fee . mas = mls —-- Lert i an amie mes penis a iene nee 9 ae em Ie ea ae oe —— sas = c = + . 7 eae a Ee = eae a Ra atta ea oe os Ba = a . : ~ a a seetindiies Ta ean nr : > ee soe. an 22) HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. Polk to move against and attack Gen. Crittenden’s divided cor ps at day- dawn, on the morning of the 13th, that the National Ar my was concen- trating, and thatit was “ highly important that your attack in the morning should be quick and decided.” But during the 12th, Gen. Wilder’ 5 which had been pushed too far out toward Ringgold, discovering its error, made a brilliant attack upon Gen. mounted brigade, Polk’s position, and by the vigor of its movement, and the 1 rapidity of its firing, created the impression upon that general that he was attacked by a very supe- rior foree, andhence at 11 o’clock that night he sent a dispatch to Bragg, stating that he had taken a strong position for defense and asking that le be heavily reinforced. Gen. Bragg again, as in the case of Honan sent Polk an immediate order not to defer his attack. and early on the morning of the 13th, at the head of Buckner’s command, went to the front: and found that no advance had been made by Polk, and that Crit- tenden, having reunited his forces, had recrossed.-the Chickamauga. Thus, gain, did Gen. Bragg’s plans fail to strike and crush the Nationa] Army in detail. After the first day’s battle of Chickamauga, September 19, had ceased, with results generally favorable to the Union forces. Gen. Bragg, in mak- Ing preparations for the battle of the eommands: Gen. Longstreet to the left plan of battle for the 20th was for Polk 20th, divided his army into two and Gen. Polk to the right. His to assault in force on his extreme right at day dawn, after whichthe attack was to be taken up by the divis- tions to Polk’s left. rapidly and when the entire line became engaged, to move forward yv igorously and per sistently throughout tts entire length, at the same time wl in succession. 1eeling on Longstreet’ s left asa pivot, and constantly pressing back Rosecrans’ | of the road to C hattanooga. the rear of the center eft, so as to obtain possession Before daylight Bragg took his position in of his line and waited until after sunrise with in- creasing anxiety and disappointment for Polk to begin his attack. Bragg then sent a staff officer to ascertain and report the reason for this delay. The staff officer. finding that Polk had s spent tl 1e night on the east side of Chickamauga Creek, rode over to hi 11m, found him at breakfast and deliv- meanwhile Bragg, impatient at the continued delay, himself rode over to the right wing and found the tr oops wholly unpre- pared for the attack. At length Polk appeared and he was urged to a prompt execution of his orders and a vigorous attack. This delay on the part of Polk enabled Rosecrans to so adjust the forces of his left w ing as to be partially prepared to receive the terrible assault of the rebel right when it was made, and it is entirely probable that the battle of the 20th. notwithstanding delays ered his message; in the obeying ofHAMILTON COUNTY. 821 orders by some of Rosecrans’ generals, would haye been a magnificent victory instead of a partial defeat for the Army of the Cumberland, but for the conduct of Brig.-Gen. Thomas J. Wood, in the attempt to obey a part of a contradictory order sent to him at 10:45 A. M. directing fan to ‘“elose up on Reynolds as fast as possible and support him.” This was undoubtedly the pivotal point in that day’s battle, but as it 1s presented with sufficient accuracy and fullness on page 557 of the general history, it is merely referred to here in the enumeration of the turning points of this battle fought magnificently by American soldiers on both sides un- der Gen. Rosecrans and Gen. Bragg. The next and last pivotal point in the battle of the 20th was when Gen. Rosecrans at Rossville took the advice of Gen. Garfield, his chief of staff, and himself retired to Chatta- nooga to re-form his retreating army, Gen. Garfield riding to the front to learn the position and condition of Gen. Thomas’ army. It is now generally believed that had Rosecrans ridden to the front and found Gen. Thomas as Gen. Garfield found him, undefeated and refusing to be de- feated, the portions of the Army of the Cumberland that had given way would have been rallied, returned to the field and turned partial defeat into complete victory. As it was, Gen. Thomas by his magnificent staying qualities won for himself that day the proud title of “The Rock of Chickamauga. ”’ Considering all things this was the hardest fought and most bloody battle of the Rebellion. Rosecrans had at no time during the two days’ fighting more than 55.000 effective men, and his losses ag- a total loss of gregated 1,687 killed: 9.394 wounded, and 5,255 missing 16,366.* Gen. Bragg, including his reinforcements from Virginia, Geor- gia and Mississippi had very nearly 70,000 effective troops, and his loss- es amounted to 2,678 killed, 16,274 wounded and 2,003 missing—a total of 20,950. On the 21st Gen. Thomas advised Gen. Rosecrans to concentrate his army at Chattanooga, which was done as soon as practicable and the siege of Chattanooga commenced. The incipient fortifications left by Gen. Bragg when he evacuated Chattanooga on the 9th, were speedily strength- ened as parts of a complete circumvallation to the east and south of the city. Gen. Bragg’s lines extended from Lookout Mountain across Chat- tanooga Valley to Missionary Ridge and along its base and summit to the Tennessee River above the city. Bragg’s object, acting contrary to the adviceof Gen. Longstreet, was to interrupt Rosecrans’communications with Bridgeport, and thus starve into surrender the army he had failed *The losses of this battle as compiled by Brig.-Gen. Richard C. Drum, adjutant-general United Sa Army, were as follows: General Headquarters—wounded, 2; missing 4; Rourteen tay Corpss aren 64: wounded, 3,555; missing, 1,925; Twentieth Army Corps—killed, 423; wOUNG ed eat surnamed Au Twenty-first Army Corps—killed, 322; wounded, 2,382; missing, 699; Reserve Cor Berane onl ws Wounges: a missing, 631; Cavalry Corps—killed, 32; wounded, 136; missing, 300. Total number lost by the y Cumberland 16,179 z n> 4 . we on at: eee | ae wt?sath i ang pe SeieC ip bactincice tne - PETS eo cea a = “ - i - - es sr a at Se mae Seka mene ance = _ : aa _ 3 ome = : ire inn ae eee wed iermeree o A tS a " - putea a aE ones : -o— - nae oe dasaies te - eee m iseape - . —. ieiicgsnisioniahamecielbioartage iF oa came aa Thien ana are a “ = ss eee -sibiis guia’ ap - spain RO - as a ma mens rey ee. =i 7 i . Shahid ae SRT 4 Z pe ncsters : as : sd Sia So etme ee oi ate - Ries ecto - 5 ¢ Seetaeesaee so mA ising Se nemocube: — ~ ae = > Epp ee, eg ee apa 2 te - Gorey pemauate eh sae —- — rn ~ ae is = On == x se wot : = : a — RG eee, - Ne er ectEaeprIecnaneeemaaes a a = z 3 E = —---—— . = 7 : — a = x aa EE ay " St , = > a a ees: ; vs aR gM Se Baap = say: aga MOTE ES aie i LOL TST = - IG) “ , ee Soca RE a ee S ; aaaen Tones arte eaaenna anne ae as r ~ oar en Re mek 2 eee apa Aeon 3 = 7 a _ + i <6 age eats Lal es “te . % : ates a a ere = ci. een ~e E : ieee = - = = * fi - Seca iosah aimee a = a < i Z aioe =F: “7 » =~ a cer ng a na Ta i i ears * eu Ry. STaRaaleeneiaatiog a ee oe ere . a : a ~ — Ss ee eee =e ade Sabena — - er — : : et > a _ ot RS a et itaoninne i a Some one ne a ati wseaoceae eae Sa pega enttion. eaters " * a —— we > . wo - “ eae - — J —— Sl i aah AaB é + a pe ae mm ——— - Sais ‘ - Sioa ec nanieenaneeraen ot > marten SS i ye , in WB \ ae ies i { a if . i a i } Lil We iH (tay | Hy Wve We Hef i j } He Wh, Hi | | Ny | tis Hit! 1 Aa 11 a iit a A ; Bou ea Bai Te HI " ek ee ne ee zs ~ ra ena ee 824 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ber of small arms. Gen. Thomas, in congratulating Hooker’s troops on the defeat of Longstreet, said: ‘The bayonet charge of Howard’s troops made up the side of a steep and difficult hill over two hundred feet high, completely routing the enemy from his barricades on its top, and the repulse by Geary of greatly superior numbers who attempted to surprise him, will rank among the distinguished feats of arms of this war.”’ These detached actions for the defense of the road between the two fer- ries are known in history as the battle of Chattanooga, by the successful issue of which the siege of Chattanooga, by November 1, was fully brought to an end, so far as the supply of the army under Gen. Thomas was concerned. But the gigantic task remained of driving away the besieging army. To accomplish this object it was necessary for Gen. Grant to await the arrival of Gen. Sherman, who, under orders from the general-in-chief of the army, left Vicksburg on the 27th of September and Memphis on the 11th of October for Corinth, on his way to Chattanooga, along the line of the Memphis & Charleston Railway. After passing through a hostile country, the people and the guerrilla bands infesting it destroying the railroad as fast as he completed it, he crossed the Tennessee River at Eastport No- vember 1, and on the same day with his head of column reached Flor- ence, Ala. On the 14th he reached Bridgeport with a large force, and on the 15th reached Chattanooga in person to confer with Gen. Grant. Gen. Bragg had sent Longstreet toward Knoxville to operate against Burnside, and Gen. Grant’s plan involved Ge with Longstreet, and falling back if necessary for the purpose of gaining time, so that when Gen. Sherman’s army should arriy strong force between Bragg return and forcing him to tl n. Burnside’s skirmishing e, he could throw a and Longstreet, thus preventing Longstreet’s 16 mountain passes to obtain his supplies. Gen. Grant’s plan of raising the siege of Chattanooga was a magnif- icent one and though slightly modified two or three times in accordance with subsequent developments was in the end brilliantly executed. It was for Sherman to attack Brageg’s right flank, force it back, and form a line extending across South Chickamauga railroad, and thus compel him to weaken | communication with his base of Hooker, who was t] Jreek, threaten or seize the 1is lines elsewhere or lose his supplies at Chickamauga Station. Gen. 1en in Lookout Valley, was to get to Chattanooga Val- ley in the most expeditious way possible, cross this valley rapidly to Rossville, and form a line across Missionary Ridge facing north, and ex- tending across Chickamauga Valley to the eastward, thus threatening Brage’s rear on that flank; and Gen. Thomas with the army of Cumber- land was to march out from his entrenchments eastward from Chatta-f LED packed HAMILTON COUNTY. §25 nooga and assault the rebel center, weakened as it was hoped it would be, by strengthening his flanks. While other movements were proceeding under Gens. Sherman and Hooker, Gen. Thomas moved forward his entrenchments east of Chattanooga and secured a line fully a mile in advance of the one occupied in the morning, and the fortifications turned to face the east instead of the west, the loss in this preliminary action being probably about 1.100 killed and wounded on either side. On the morning of the 24th Sherman, having by daylight floated pontoons from North Chickamauga to South Chickamauga Creek, and by means of them and a steamboat crossed his entire army by about noon, at 1 o'clock started for his assault on the north end of Missionary Ridge, which by night he had carried, his right being at the tunnel and his left at Chick- amauga Creek. On the same day Hooker fought his famous ‘ battle above the clouds” on Lookout Mountain, captured 2,000 prisoners, and Grant’s line was then acontinuous one from the Tennessee at the mouth of South Chickamauga Creek up to and over the north end of Missionary Ridge, then to Chattanooga Valley, then to the mouth of Chattanooga Creek, and thence up the slope of Lookout Mountain to the foot of the upper palisade. Hooker, in order to gain his position in this line, had been obliged, as was said, to fight his famous ‘battle above the clouds,” and and cross over the point of Lookout Mountain. His troops had been en- abled to gain the plateau on the north slope of the mountain, in full view from the city of Chattanooga in clear weather, by a flank movement under Gen. Geary, who, unobserved, had crossed Lookout Creek near Wauhatchie, while Cruft and Osterhaus held the enemy’s attention in crossing near the railroad bridge down below. The plateau was gained by all these commands about noon. A heavy mist had favored the move- ments of these troops, by rendering them toa great extent invisible to both armies; butthe sound of their musketry and artillery was incessantly heard. And while the fighting on this plateau was going on, the eitizens. of Chattanooga and the soldiers of the Union Army were presented with a magnificent spectacle for hours—the innumerable flashes of musketry all up and down the mountain side being rendered more plainly visible by the darkness caused by the mist or fog which partially hid the sol- diers themselves from view. Having gained full possession of Lookout Mountain. Hooker’s com- mand encamped for the night, and early on the morning of the 25th started across the Chattanooga Valley for Missionary Ridge at Rossville, which he reached about 2 o'clock, having been detained from three to four hours at Chattanooga Creek because of the destruction of the bridges across that creek by the rebel soldiers in their retreat. At Rossville heee ee gg, eat eh a AMEE OER oa aa i Sale Bai RTS ise te. Name nen om - = ns: _ See Pe ACR RTL ae a Sean a bao a eS ST oe —., SaAT ee Soe 2 echt ea reer oe pee — pi ange EL a Sarit — S a ae as = wer * it Pt . jal ~ - ‘ re 7 ~ = Jt ve Ss ‘ ie gaa oy ay weet us | eee r ; ‘ <1 ihe siidteiad . sani creer ° < - = oe A aa Ey Eo iti Be SRA in : ~ ‘ ¥ : Ash : fee eins Seen ee o : gene a ms = ery FAR 2 a ina DO nT ne Saran ren tne ame ae ; paiees Seyesnenace pene * 7 = = ~ - r > “ —- =r eee : = a ———— ee a = = the = = = —— a “5 = c : es ee = = SSS SS a = ~ - nr : - an - ~awes Se Te Tia eo — — 7 - = -s a e es 4 — ee ae a Somer Hey Be er sana es orem aR i ser r a peek ge as ca §30 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. In 1874 two associations, previously organized, were consolidated, viz. : The Memorial and Monumental Associations, and the new organization was named the Chattanooga Confederate Memorial Association. A con- stitution was adopted and signed by fifteen persons May 14, 1874; a few others signed later in that year and three in 1876. The object of this association was to collect the remains of the dead of the late Confederate Army and bury them in a cemetery in or near Chattanooga. Mrs. Penel- ope M. Cooke was president of this association from its organization to the time of her death, December 25, 1875. She was succeeded by Mrs. Anna F. Hight, who was succeeded in 1878 by Mrs. B. D. Lodor, who served until May, 1885, when Mrs. P. A. Brauner was elected, serving until May, 1886, when Mrs. L. T. Dickinson, the present presiding officer, was elected. The secretaries have been Mrs. P. A. Brauner, Tomlinson Fort, Mrs. W. G. Oehmig, Miss Mary Trigg, Miss Mary Cooke and Mrs. Louise G. Connor. About 2,500 bodies have been collected and laid to rest in this cemetery, and a fine monument, erected to their memory, was dedicated May 10, 1877, a day long to be remembered in the history of Chattanooga, as on that day the fraternal feeling, which had for some time been growing, first found public and glad expression. The exercises of dedication were participated in by soldiers of both the Confederate and Federal Armies, and by all classes of the people. The monument, de- signed by G. C. Connor, was erected at a cost of about $2,000. Since the war the members of the Legislature from Hamilton County have been as follows: Senators: A. M. Cate, 1865 and 1867; A. A. Pearson, 1869; E. A. James, 1873; L. S. Marye, 1875; R. P. Lloyd, 1877; John R. Neal, 1879; J. L. Gaston, 1881; H. L. W. Raulston, 1883; H. B. Case, 1885. Representatives: James R. Hood, 1865; John Anderson, 1866 and 1867; E. A. James, 1869; C. C. Patton, 1873; George R. James 1875;S A. Key, 1877; H. M. Wiltse, 1879 and 1881; H. B. Case and Peter Bolton, 1883; W. C. Hodge and T. H. Davis, 1885. Following is the presidential vote in Hamilton County from 1868 to 1884 inclusive: 1868—Ulysses S. Grant, 1,273; Horatio Seymour, 393; 1872—Grant, 1,630; Horace Greeley, 1,098; 1876—Rutherford B. Hayes, 1,888; Samuel J. Tilden, 1,613; 1880—James A. Garfield, 2,460; W. S. Hancock, 1,595; J. B. Weaver, 117; 1884—James G. Blaine, 3,829; Grover Cleveland, 2,439. Gubernatorial vote: March 4, 1865, W. G. Brownlow, 705; no oppo- sition; 1867—W. G. Brownlow, 1,480; Emerson Etheridge, 302; 1869— D. W. C. Senter, Stokes, - 1870—W. H. Wisener, 1,364; J. ©. Brown, 1,171; 1872—A. A. Freeman, 1,602: J. C. Brown, 1,161;\ . : | ‘ ri eee HAMILTON COUNTY. S31 1874—Horace Maynard, 1,155; James D. Porter, 1,145: 1876—George Maney ——; James D. Porter, 1,627; Dorsey B. Thomas. 1.086: W. Peevardley, ———; 1878——h. Mz Wight 103) A. So oMarks. lier: M. Edwards, 43; 1880—Alvin Hawkins, 2.440: John V. Wright, 1,428: S. F. Wilson, 346; R. M. Edwards, 114: 1882—Alvin Hawkins. 2.385 = William B. Bate. 1,633; Joseph H. Fussell, 89; John R. Beasley. 29, - 1884—Frank T. Reid, 4,263; William B. Bate, 2.366; W. J. Buchanan ——; 1886—Robert L. Taylor, 2;381; Alfred A. Taylor, 3,581. Following is a list of the principal county officers from 1820 to 1876. since which time election returns are obtainable and are introduced in connection with most officers’ names: Asahel Rogers’ name is signed as county court clerk to the first deed registered after the county was organized, to which he also affixed his “ Privet seal,” not having an official seal at the office that day, March 1, 1821. Asahel Rogers remained in this office until 1844, when he was succeeded by William T. Rogers. Subsequent clerks have been R. Hen- derson, 1847; James Clift, 1848; John H. Robertson, Novemher 1848-56;.; George W. Arnett, 1856-60; Charles W. Vinson, 1860-64; R. H. Guthrie, 1864-70; J. H. Hardie, 1870-74; L. M. Clark, from 1874 to present time (1886). Sheriffs: Charles Gamble, Terrill Riddle, A. M. Rogers, Matthew Anderson, John Johnson, J. C. Francis, James Roddy, James C. Connor, William Snow. Milo Coulter, G. W. Rider, A. B. Connor, William H. Bean, J. C. Connor, Charles B. Champion. The sheriffs collected the taxes up to 1840. From that time to 1876 there served the following as— Tax collectors: James Rogers, Newton McGill, A. Selcer, Joseph Yarnell, W. H. Bean, M. Adams and D. B. Ragsdale. Trustees: Thomas Stiff, William Rogers, Alfred King, A. P. Hunter, George W. Julian, Jesse Locke, W. H. Crowder, George Curry, F-. Vaughn. Registers: J. H. Jones, 1819; James S Yarnell, 1836" ALG. We Puckett, 1840; Resin M. Rawlings, 1842; John H. Torbett, 1843; A. A. Vinson, 1844; J. B. Peters, 1853; A. W. Moore, 1860; John F. Hamill, 1868; H. C. Beck, from 1874 to the present time. Circuit court clerks: Daniel Henderson, Dr. P. H. Butler, B. C. Con- ner, B. B. Cannon, A. G. W. Puckett, E. A. Glass, William Rogers, C. W. Vinson. The first surveyor of Hamilton County was Samuel R. Russell, who’ served from 1824 to 1828. He was followed by John Cummings from 1828 to 1830; B. B. Cannon, 1830-37; Noble J. Tounnel, a short time im 1837; Robert Tumall, 1837-47; Alexander T. Prowell, 1847-48; Presleysien aoe nto ar gi sg NRE ET page a msetalp rng ee RL Nie reer 5c eoeereees i ee 3c SE oo tome lie. — ES ter og oe ee. LoS ERT ee Pe iC TL ee <—eree =r ST INT ee eer mance ¢ ine al ring “entre ee a ne te ee enn ee ae ipeerenet ge Nea ie oo a eS ee ce YF - ae ees a zo [aa - = aes ie aE ke ae : a , | Mascagni Aas iE vegies eee . 4 PR Sa See A Ps ae EN = 2 = eigt erates Te ALG SERIO = Seaman i i eat i nee eee: pee pp ee = arene = ki ade = Soe Se eee Te seis gene ae RE ala: = = iene ~T mn = > J sere . 2 pelea " ane arenes eee a enmaeeameel apne ¥ — eae —- 4 s See ES ae ll za - i Te ia pleas 0 pense Se . _—— > ead nas . : mn aan sala es, aan ae ne come aon en ag RPE se ——- aati, Sa i : 1 lar Aen 5 MD . Sar eraniel nace = Tee ee oe ee, aOR po = Se echatiiemnebaian etiam ee rh a eae oe ‘oes oa ~ e o Z riety ea wetennw = sone = a — - . EF TEE TE EY i a - einen i an oan I ep TE Moa oes Q34 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. 1,654; Roulston, 2,353; Coppinger, 7; representative— Woodard, 1,658; Patterson, 1,669; Case, 2,284; Bolton, 2,347; Gillespie, 6; Stokes, 9. In the Third Congressional District Dibrell’s vote was 11,403; Trew- hitt’s, 9,698. In 1884 the Congressional vote in Hamilton County was for Neal, Democrat, 2,249; H. C. Evans, Republican, 4,392, while in the entire district Evans’ vote was 14,221, and Neal’s 14,289. In 1886 the Congressional vote was for Neal, 2,800; John T. Wilder, Republican, 3 655: senator—Kennedy, Republican, 3,332; Whitice, Democrat, 2,632; representative—Stone, Republican, 3,485; Hutchins, Republican (colored), 2,742; Drumbar, Democrat, 2,734; Lloyd, Democrat, 2,525. In the entire district Wilder’s vote was 13,818; Neal’s, 14,115. The first judges of the circuit court were Thomas Keith, George W. Rowles and John C. Gaut, the latter being the first to preside in this court since the war. ‘The first records of this court are dated October 3, 1864, all previous to that time haying been destroyed, the session being held at Harrison, with John C. Gaut, presiding. George W. Rider, sheriff, returned a venire facias executed upon the following persons: Wilham Hickman, Moses Smith, McKinney Adams, A. Selcer, Caswell Hall, C. E. Shelton, James Childres, J. EH. McKenzie, F. M. Capps, John A. Brownlow, Peter Munger, Alfred Bettis, W. R. Davis, Charles New- ton, James Cannon, Jesse Shipley, Hiram Pendegrass, Henry Hickman, J. M. Watson, E. M. Cleveland, George Phillips, Washington Evans, Nathan Howard, Daniel F. Houser and William Vandegriff, all good and lawful men, and also summoned Joseph C. Given and R. C. Johnson to attend as constables. Charles W. Vinson, elected clerk of the court March 5, 1864, presented his bonds as such, in the sum of $10,000, to faithfully keep and preserve the records; $5,000, to account for all fines and forfeitures; $25,000, as special commissioner and $5,000 as tax col- lector. The grand jury was discharged on the same day from attendance on the court. The first case on the records was that of Joseph Yarnell vs. William Johnson, resulting in a stay of judgment for six months in order to allow the plaintiff time to file declaration, and quite a number of similar cases followed with similar results. The whole number of cases on this day was thirty-nine. The court was next held September 2, 1865, George W. Bridges hay- ing been assigned to hold it, the Fourth Judicial District being then composed of the counties of Bradley, Polk, Rhea, Hamilton, McMinn, Meigs and Marion. A number of the cases of attachment held over until this court, were decided in favor of the plaintiffs, judgment being ren- dered in some of them for $10,000 and interest; but those cases to which attach the most and perhaps the only interest in a historic sense, were theHAMILTON COUNTY. 835 indictments for treason. Following is the form of the indictment: The State vs. James Moore. The presentment was signed by all the grand jury and was to the effect that James Moore on the first day of May, 1862, and on divers other times, before and after that date in Hamilton County, traitorously, knowingly and wittingly, did aid and assist enemies at open war with the State of Tennessee and the United States, to wit: the pretended Government of the Confederate States of America, by pro- curing and persuading other persons to enlist in the armies of said enemy against the peace and dignity of the State; and the grand jury upon their oaths did further present that the said James Moore on the same day as above and before and after in Hamilton County, knowingly, wittingly and traitorously, did aid and assist enemies at open war with the State and the United States, to wit: the pretended Government of the Confederate States of America, by furnishing said enemy so at war, with arms, ammu- nition, provisions and other articles for their aid and comfort, against the peace and dignity of the State. The presentment was endorsed by Simeon Eldridge, George Phillips, Nathan Howard, Orson Shipley, James Ray, W. R. Brown, W. R. Mosy, James Allen, D. K. Kimbrough, George Varner, H. C. Alexander, Jonathan Jackson and Christian Suit- eman. On October 5, 1865, twenty-one other individuals were indicted for treason, and on the 10th of February, 1866, George W. Bridges on the bench, several of these treason cases were brought on for trial, and were disposed of by quashing the indictments and setting the defendants at liberty. Numerous indictments for felonious assault and murder committed during the years of the war, were brought, and for horsestealing, burglary, larceny, robbery, gaming, lewdness, retailing liquor without license and manufacturing liquor without bond, showing an exceedingly disturbed condition of society, during and immediately succeeding the war. On June 4, 1866, William L. Adams took his seat upon the bench and upon February 11, 1867. Daniel C. Trewhitt presided and was suc- ceeded by John B. Hoyl, ‘n 1870. The last day of this court in Harrison was December 5, 1870, when it adjourned to meet in Chatta- nooga on the second Monday in March, 1871. On the 6th of October, 1869, Elvira Yarnell was indicted for murdering her infant child, and upon trial was found guilty of murder in the first degree on February 8, 1870. Being recommended to the mercy of the court, the sentence, hanging, was commuted to imprisonment for lites in March, 1871, James Smith, colored, and Tabitha Davis, white, were indicted for living together as man and wife, found guilty, and sentenced to the penitentiary for twelve months, but on account of mitigating circumstances, the sen- } Ps A a Pal ry i RY , ee eee acn | yy h hele Ge ' + 1B LEE t Se al a! 4 an ii ef : i ai Sa Sah ea oe —_— ae ES. ae EE IE TF Genes re tenn Ne ETT eae if See = a " reac: Re Me fh nor Sn le 5 a me : aaa Seer Ee - \& : on coe hiner oe ae Soke SS Soe eel aa snes pace Se eas copie he ra | 3 Me ‘ ‘ a i i rane ' ee aoe eaom oa ee ce 0 ae ee a eee. ge are os i ee wil we * Nett oe a a atin nO RE ret Oe gt Le pap ip AE RE i 29 oH 5 ee ne — i san ikincinee Sa REIT ie PS ye eae we — wo a ee : “ =~ ig ma oe anes ae ne : ~ SIO Ee a ease oe) si sae d ee ee ak See: = a oe eT ee and i 5 : eS 4 : . ~~ ~ ~ . aeeunaeel ; ies eee at ‘ - - = a —_ ad - aii aetna a —— a r — “aw 7m = rae ~ é . 7 a Ce ae = 3 eS ten patie Pr ee ms = a s ae ie ia SPOT ats 5 To at o * ee i RS se : - a7 - a. eget eee a SS ela TERN GS. — pena - a a ce ee ang = ye mone ny Se * Bee mile Ne TT Ie dati tare 2 nt es Se eee a ee ARSE = Ss : Sena ore — = = per Ree phe pep 7 renee en Saar A SS pia icra cman une > —— Sa Ti ccna ere Tater nerrinnr eerie PS PRE IE ye a, cae STA BIAS 836 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. tence was commuted to a fine and imprisonment in the county jail—Tab- itha Davis to be imprisoned twenty days and pay a fine of $10, and Smith to be imprisoned forty days and pay a fine of $50. For a few days, commencing November 19, 1873, Chancellor D. M. Key presided in this court by interchange with Judge John B. Hoyl, and also in April, 1874; and in September and November, 1875, W. M. Brad- ford presided similarly. The present judge of this court was elected in 1878. The most important trial during his term was that of Henry Lawson for having committed a rape upon the person of Miss Nancy Donaldson on the 4th of July, 1881. The jury in this case was com- posed of Henry Schwartz, C. H. Dyer, A. Poe, M. S. Brown, W. F. Mont- gomery, M. C. D. Bryant, James Clements, J. H. Brown, David Hart- man, T. H. Dutton, John Kesterson and Peter Boltman. The attorneys for the prosecution were J. M. Robertson and Lewis Shepherd, and those for the defense were Otto Fischer and H. B. Case: The trial was hastened on by Judge Trewhitt, for fear that Lawson, being a colored man, would be taken from the jail and hanged by amob. He was convicted July 25, 1881, sentenced July 27, and hanged September 2, 1881. The re- markable thing about this trial was that Lawson was probably innocent of the crime for which he was hanged, evidence to this effect transpiring after the hanging took place; but the community, incensed at the commission of so heinous a crime upon a white woman and believing her accusation to be true, would have hung the ac- cused had time been given to produce evidence tending to prove his in- nocence. Other hangings in this county have been two since the war, at Harrison, and one in 1876, of Shade Westmoreland, for murdering his paramour’s husband. The most terrible tragedy in which this county has been directly in- terested, though committed outside of her limits, was the murder of William T. Cate, sheriff of Hamilton County, and his deputy, J. J. Con- way. hey were on their way to Knox County with three prisoners for trial in the supreme court, and both officers were assassinated while en route by brothers of one of the prisoners. At Sweetwater two men boarded the train, made furtive glances at and seemed to recognize one of the prison- ers named Taylor, behind whom Deputy Sheriff Conway was sitting. One of the assassins sitting behind Conway deliberately drew his pistol, placed it behind Conway’s ear and fired, killing him instantly. Almost at the same instant another man on the opposite side of the car opened fire upon Sheriff Cate, who was shot four times in all and soon after died of his wounds. The assassins were John, Bob and Andy ‘Taylor. John was wounded in thearm but all temporarily escaped. After some timeHAMILTON COUNTY. 837 Bob Taylor was killed three miles from Lebanon, Mo., by R. P. Goodall, sheriff of the county. John Taylor died about forty miles from the same place and Andy was hanged at Loudon, Tenn., November 23, 1883. The county of Hamilton was originally in the Second Chancery Divis- ion of the State, and in 1858 held sessions in Harrison on the first Mon- days of March and September. The first chancellor was Thomas L. Williams, who has been succeeded by T. Nixon Van Dyke, A. G. Welck- er, Daniel C. Trewhitt, D. M. Key and William M. Bradford. The first records of this court now in existence are dated at Harrison, then the county seat, February 7, 1865. OD. ©. Trewhitt, appointed by Andrew Johnson to fill the vacancy caused by the war, presided. Chan- cellor Trewhitt appointed as clerk and master Addison P. Hunter, who gave bonds in the aggregate to the amount of $40,000. D. C. Trewhitt held court until August 9, 1870, and was succeeded by D. M. Key, who presided at the December term at Harrison, which lasted one day, on which day, December 5, it adjourned to meet at Chattanooga. A special term of this court commenced at Chattanooga, January 23, 1871, 1D), WIL Key, presiding, since which time there has been but one chancery court in the county. The most important cases tried in this court have been the scrip case and that of the exemption from taxes of manufacturing establishments for a period of years. The history of each of these cases is briefly as follows: In 1869 an ordinance was passed by the city council of Chattanooga, providing that all taxes due to the city, except the school tax, should be paid in scrip issued by the city, and that all labor employed by the city, including labor upon public works, should be paid in scrip. For three or four years there was very little friction resulting from this ordinance, because the scrip kept up to very nearly par, but about 1873 it be- gan to depreciate, sinking to 75 or 80 cents, and before the year expired, to BO cents and even 45 cents, one result of this depreciation being that the city had to pay for labor $2 per day in scrip, while private cor- porations were paying not over 90 cents or $1 per day in sash. Mer- chants refused to receive the scrip in payment for dry goods and gro- ceries, and the laboring man receiving it could buy with it nothing to eat or wear. At length a little coterie of capitalists was formed for the purpose of buying up the scrip at heavy discounts and holding it for redemption by the city at par, or for appreciation in the market. Before tax-paying time would come, labor on public works was suspended, all the scrip issued would find its way into the hands of the ring, and the moment taxes were due, the authorities being prohibited by ordi- nance from receiving anything but scrip for taxes, the tax-payer would,ee mee Hi 1 i ' He ae at teh at a Hh aie | Seat f Pb fii eae ree ‘ Lp ey) et rat ne anble a ie pe at ; ; : fa i He 8) (i | : PY f | i : al i : tay If i A i Pe Pela TE a EG it Bay | Pe BL aR aH tat te le ia ie i et a Ha PG ae q j rari | Hi ta ny , eae E If 1h ai eM} ati . Lt i sity ii | A ae 13 | ie ii 459 a : Vee ta : Ht i i Heh | i tas Aad aie Hea i, tp Hela) ie Gay; ta pa || ( " Mah qi Wl f mie \ Pinte | Oe eae ems #4 ; i ae he | ta tae | Vn Hi edi j ea a ak Net ela ; yj Hy gartt a4 ie eI | 44 0 i ae i real eet) ) Hee eer hits Lye ai) Wt 4 Fe | it at Meet Ge | ay eae ata Eee | Vege yah ae it 1 Hy igi fg Fi 15 ih +} ah Peete peel a Tn Faeneel f ne ae . Tipe aes HG Hen ale! ta Set deat Pie | yay he | Pau silt | 4 i Pees erm geri | aay Wy TE a Meee Tt ine, mel | ae Par ee a Be oe ae CG Ve dia: | | tae da pee Bal | | Ht | ET ay eae eee a) Fa A al | Ramee lhl ay ailrly HR TRE dit H | ei hy i TU Hai aii | i Wale Wha i Pn Re : oH elit + ie ea Te WRN | te Le ait nt : 4 Wie ray ad by Vai i i ae Magara uiat aa SUT at H | Rae een NS) tee) |) Be hd) | ft i j teen vie |) Be | Pe enti | it Berens i eee nt Uh aie at eum 3 eS Be Seopa — See i es a ar Sa per NEN GG aE Bao 838 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. from necessity, take his greenbacks, gold, or silver to these men and buy scrip at, say 90 cents on the dollar, and turn it over at par to the city in payment of his taxes. Thus the city was robbed right and left, caus- ing great dissatisfaction; but the system was kept up until 1875, when about $240,000 was outstanding, and nearly as much more was issued during the fiscal year, 1875-76. In the beginning of the year 1876-77, Col. H. B. Case was elected city attorney, and the first question he was required to solve was as to the legality of the issuance of this Scrip. After a careful investigation he was obliged to report that it was in vio- lation of the constitution of Tennessee, and of the banking act of the United States. Aldermen ceased the issuance of scrip and also its redemption, returning Upon this report being made, the Board of Mayor and Immediately the scrip ring, holding about $280,000 of it, began to bring suits against the city in sums under $500, before jus- to a cash basis. tices of the peace, with the view of getting judgments in small sums for the whole amount, and then by mandamus compelling the city to levy a tax for its payment. A bill of injunction was filed by the city attorney, setting up the unconstitutionality of purchasing the scrip below its face and selling it to the tax-payers at an advance, and that in equity they were entitled to receive no more than they had paid for it, and requiring all holders of scrip to come into chancery court and have an account taken and statement made showing the amount that each holder had paid, and also requiring him to receive that amount in such reasonable levies of taxes as the city could stand, suggesting one, two, three and four years as proper time. Chancellor Bradford issued an injunction in accordance with this bill, and ordered publication, enjoining all holders of serip from bringing suit, and enjoining the mayor and aldermen from taking up any scrip, except upon order from the Court. Under this bill trial was had and injunction made permanent. An appeal was then taken to the supreme court, but about the same time a suit, brought by W. J. Colburn, et al., against the mayor and aldermen, invokving the legality of this same scrip was decided by the supreme court, declaring that all issues of orders by any municipality, which anticipated future tax- ation, were in violation of the constitution of the State, and of the char- ter of the municipality. Thereupon the Board of Mayor and Aldermen, under the permission of the chancery court, set aside a certain amount of the tax levy for the redemption of the scrip, and periodically as the levy was collected for that purpose, advertised for the lowest bids at which holders would sell their scrip to the elty. Upon this principle in the course of some three years, all was purchased, except about $15,000, at prices ranging from 48 to 60 cents, and the balance redeemed at par.\. ' ny eke HAMILTON COUNTY. 839 , In 1871 an ordinance was passed by the city council exempting from taxation any manufacturing property for a period of ten years from the time of its establishment. The second question proposed to City Attorney Case was as to the legality of this exemption. Col. Case re- ported that the ordinance was in violation of the constitution and laws of the State, and as the result of this report the Mayor and Board of Aldermen began the collection of taxes from that year on property pre- viously exempt under the ordinance. Some of the manufacturers re- sisted the collection of the taxes, and the cases went to the chancery eourt and thence to the supreme eourt of the State, in which the position of the Mayor and Board of Aldermen was sustained. But no attempt was made to collect taxes for previous years. The records of the county court were destroyed up to 1864, the first day’s proceedings on record being April 4, 1864. Twenty justices pre- sented their commissions, signed by Gov. Andrew Johnson. Peter Munger was elected chairman, and T. W. Spicer and A. J. Thomas were elected the other members of the “court of quorum.” R. H. Guthrie gaye bonds as clerk of the court in the aggregate sum of $25,000. Commissioners were appointed to repair the courthouse, the repairs be- ing completed in 1866, and costing about e400. A. G. W. Puckett was then county judge. R. C. McRee became county judge in 18%, and Hugh Whiteside in 1886. ames A. Whiteside was one of the first lawyers in Hamilton County and one of the ablest that has ever lived in Tennessee. While exceed- ingly unostentatious, he was also exceedingly sagacious. His plans were laid with certainty and carried out successfully, and they were usually a success before the public knew of their existence. He was more of a lawyer than an advocate, was clear and logical in his ar- gument, and as a consequence was More effective before a court than be- fore a jury. He was a man of great reading and of much general in- formation, and was the father of the railroad system of Tennessee. He was appointed by the Legislature, December 8 1843, to assess the damages to‘the school lands in Hamilton County, caused thereto by the building of the Western & Atlantic Railroad, and authorized to demand and. receive from the State of Georgia whatever damages said school lands might have sustained. Mr. Whiteside was of medium height, slender, well proportioned and straight. While he was at one time a member of the Legislature, he generally eschewed politics. He was a Whig until the election of James Buchanan to the presidency in 1856, when he became a Democrat. He was born in 1803, and died in Noyem- ber, 1861.SR ESE EOL RETIRE ~ -—-—— sani ape = ei o. e = teenie ae ee ae TT ee em Boa oe, “ see a ee b ee em ss ire = - —— ———— Seance: cee as al a ae eons . ici iaiondoaeenliab Spat RN pee ae renee nr a _———_— ee —-< ae egeeten ner eS Seen ten GIRS sate Snippet : > ae a, SS see pa = eae eee TT a iin’ anaes aa ae aS eR eT 840 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. A. G. Welcker was a native of Roane County, Tenn., and was ed- ucated at the University of Tennessee. He was a splendid lawyer, but not so successful as an adyocate. He came to Chattanooga about 1850, had a fine practice and was elected chancellor of this division, but when the Federal Army took possession he was ousted from his office and moved to Cleveland, where he died in 1867 or 1868. Hon. D. M. Key was his law partner from 1853 to the time of the war. Mr. Welcker was a Whig, but never ran for any office except that of chancellor. Reese B. Brabson was a native of Sevier County, Tenn.; came to Chattanooga, having graduated from Maryville College, and became the law partner of James A. Whiteside. Mr. Brabson was especially strong before a jury, was very pleasant in his manners and was a very popular man. He was the Whig candidate for presidential elector in 1856, in opposition to Hon. D. M. Key, and was elected to Congress in 1858. John A. Minnis was an early lawyer of Chattanooga, and had a full practice. He was elected to the Legislature, and at the close of the war settled in Montgomery, Ala., where he became city judge, and also United States District Attorney for the northern district of Alabama, holding court at Montgomery and Huntsville. Gen. Francis M. Walker was an attorney at Chattanooga; was a good lawyer, but more of an advocate. He was a gentleman and very agree- able in his manners. He was a very brave soldier, became a brigadier- general in the rebel army and was killed at Atlanta. George W. Lyle came to Chattanooga in 1856 from Clarksville, and married a daughter of Robert Cravens. He was a graduate of the law school of Cumberland University. He was a lawyer of great promise, and while a good speaker had no taste for politics, but his career was cut short by death in 1860. The population of Hamilton County when organized has been elsewhere given. In 1860 it was as follows: Whites, 11,641; slaves, 1,419; free colored, 192; Indians, 6; total, 13,258. In 1870: Whites, 13,053; colored, 4,188; foreigners, 582; total, 17,823. In 1880: outside of Chattanooga, 11,516; Chattanooga, 12,938; total, 24,454. At this census the colored population in Chattanooga numbered 9,082; outside, 2,317. The voters numbered 6,017; males, 12,025, and females, 12,429. The assessed valuation of real estate in the county in 1880 was $4,156,465; of personal estate, $539,433. The taxes assessed in the year 1880 were, State, $13,895: county, $32,773; municipal, $75,- 619. The debt was, bonded, $21,000; floating, $95,264. The number of milch cows was 1,696; gallons of milk produced, 30,116; pounds of butter, 119,281; cheese, 20; pounds of wool, 10,690; number ofPs = ae —— 4 re. 5 a : Heat HAMILTON COUNTY. 841 farms, 930; acres of improved land, 55,854; value of farms, $1,948,179; of. live stock, $245,893; of all farm products, $381,534; cost of fertilizers purchased, 487. The number of manufacturing establishments then was 58; amount of capital employed, $2,045,000; males employed above sixteen years old, 1,958; females above fifteen, 7; children and youth, 168; wages paid during the year, $568,508; materials used, $2,056,438 ; yalue of product, $3,230,006. The public schools of Hamilton County are numerous and are improv- ing. Previous to the establishment of the common-school system in the State, the people here, as elsewhere, depended upon private schools, but it would be very difficult to make even a tolerably accurate list of them. The most noted one that can now be remembered was Aldehoft’s Institute, which was located on top of Lookout Mountain, about four miles south from the Point. It was so named from its founder, Prof. H. W. Von Aldehoff, a noted and learned teacher of ante bellum days. This institute was established in the fall of 1860, and was successfully conducted until some time during its third year, when owing to the advance of the Union Armies, it was suspended from force of circumstances. The building re- mained standing until within a few years, and was used in 1878 by re- fugees from the yellow fever scourge. At the present time nothing remains standing but the chimney, a monument to all that was peculiar in the Southern system of edu pation. ‘The present common-school system was established by act of the Leg- islature in March, 1867, and under this act E. O. Tade became the first superintendent of public instruction in Hamilton County, at a salary of $700 per annum, serving four years. He was succeeded in 1871 by J. H. Hardie, who also served four years. At the beginning of Mr. Tade’s term the county owned outside of Chattanooga three lots, but no school- house, and the school property remained in this condition until after W. M. Beene’s election as superintendent in 1875. During his term of two years, four schoolhouses were erected, one in the Second Civil District; one in the Fourth, one in the Eleventh, and one in the Fifteenth. Ei ne Rogers was elected superintendent in 1877, and during his term of two years, two schoolhouses were built, one in the First Civil District and one in the Twelfth. Under the administration of A. Shelton, who was elected in 1879, and served nearly four years, twenty-three schoolhouses were erected upon lots purchased by the county; and during the term of the present superintendent, H. B. Heywood, elected in 1883, there have been erected eleven more, so that at present the county owns forty school- houses, besides which it rents nine, making forty-nine in allin use. The salary of the superintendent was $700 per year until 1875, when it wasSees ¥ ~ Pee ee ee Sy cd Sepa te | bak i eas eae | Ns Hit 4 fe uty i aCe ee Be Wet a WE } . i} fea , He ae W e BSH that tr i ' ’ = a a ae eee s er SLT % me saieiantiiieda a ae rr orem arom * ane CS Aaen tS 8S ade age = se Rhee Mins * Se ey ee te HT Re oats eee See ae - FLT ARTE eS ee ee es aie f camer ome pp pert eas BF SS AT I SE ea A a IE Rae A ome —_ es ee Se ee hires Seth Aa a i TOT i Nace is NET a ig SN ae Sie rere" LT 849 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. reduced to $300, and remained at that figure until 1883, when it was raised to $600 per annum, its present figure. At first the teachers were of a very inferior order; but Mr. Tade, al- though laboring under many discouragements, awakened considerable interest in the cause of education. During Mr. Beene’s administration one teachers’ institute was held; none was held under Mr. Rogers’, but under Mr. Shelton’s there were seven the first year, thirteen the second, ten the third and during the fourth under him there were two, and under P. A. Wall, appointed to fll out the unexpired term of Mr. Shel- ton, there were four institutes. Under the present superintendent, there have been four each year for white teachers, and two during his term for colored teachers, who have increased in numbers from one under Mr. Tade, to fifteen under Mr. Heywood. Teachers began to improve under Mr. Beene, and became decidedly better under Mr. Shelton who raised the standard of scholarship to which it was necessary to attain in order to obtain a certificate. Up to 1885, certificates were given for one year, when under an act of the Legislature, they were first, and have been since, granted also for three years. The school fund of the county has slowly but steadily increased. In 1867 it was $1 per scholar; in 1871 it became $1.60; in 1875, $2; in 1879, $2.25; in 1882, $2.50; in 1884, $2.60, the highest figure it has yet reached, In 1886, on account of the abnormal increase of the scholastic population, the school fund dropped to $2.51 per scholar. The scholas- tic population of the county in 1876 was as follows: W hites—male, 1,751; female, 1,705. Colored—male, 715; female, 719; total, 4,890. In 1883 it was 8,423; in 1884, 9,618; in 1885, 10,454, and in 1886. at the close of the school year, June 30, 11,661. The schools were taught one month in the year under Mr. Tade; when Mr. Shelton became superintendent they were being taught three months in the year; at the close of his term, four and a half months, and in 1885, five months and one day. There are about fifteen good schoolhouses in the county, well furnished with seats, while the rest are of rather a primitive order. The forty belonging to the county are worth about $500 each, including furniture and land, though there are a few quite valuable properties—that in the Fifth Dis- trict (No. 2), with its two acres of land, being worth about $12,000. Apparatus has been introduced into about six schools in the county. The salaries of teachers average about $33 per month. Satisfactory progress can not be made in the schools until a generous salary shall be paid teachers, thus attracting superior talent, and excluding that which is inferior, for, as a general thing, the people will not permit inferior tal- ent to receive large pay.HAMILTON COUNTY. 843 The following schools have been incorporated under the ‘‘ four-mile law: Poe Spring Academy, August 15, 1879; Pleasant Grove Semi- nary, December 28, 1879; Soddy Preparatory and High School, February 13, 1880, and Bethlehem Academy, September 10, 1881. Previous to the establishment of the present graded system of public schools in Chattanooga, private schools were the main dependence of the people. One of these was the Chattanooga High School for Girls, which was established in 1872, its second session opening September 2 of that year. H. H. Sneed was the rector; J. L. Cooper, professsor of mathe- maticsand ancient languages; HE. Krutch, professor of modern languages; Miss M. H. Shepard, principal of the preparatory and primary depart- ments, and Miss Dismukes, assistant principal. In the fall of 1872, under an ordinance passed the previous July, the graded system was established and went into operation the first Monday in January, 1873. The first members of the board of school commis- sioners were as follows, two from each ward: S. B. Moe and E. H. Price; J. F. Loomis and Willard Abbott; A. M. Johnson and H. ©. Evans; W. D: Van Dyke and E. M. Wight; James Rollins and T. A. Hunt. Following are the names of the officers of the board: S. B. Moe, president; A. M. Johnson, vice-president; H. C. Evans, treasurer, and H. D. Wyatt, secre- tary and superintendent of schools. The city was divided into three dis- tricts, the first comprising the First and Fourth Wards; the second, the Second and Third Wards, and the third, the Fifth Ward. Besides a school in each ward there was the Howard Free School and later the Union Primary School. Some time previously a school for colored chil- dren had been opened under the auspices of the American Missionary Association, which in time passed under control of the board of commis- sioners. ‘The schools remained in session five months the first year, having a total enrollment in the first district of 203; in the second of 988; in the third of 248; in the Howard School of 325, and in the Union Primary, of 88. The salaries paid ranged from $90 per month, paid to the principal of the Howard Free School, and $75 per month to each of the principals of the three district schools, down to $45 per month to each of seven teachers, $40 per month to each of three, and $35 per month to each of two. The entire number of white children, of school age, was 1,490; of colored, 897; of white children enrolled, 772; of colored, 415. The school board erected one new school building in the first district that year, and rented the rest of the room needed, with the exception of the Howard school building which was furnished by the American Mission- ary Association. ‘The prime necessity of the schools then was buildings. The entire cost of establishing and maintaining the city schools for the : ? us Be iSE — a ee! SSeS oe en ae een EET 5 oma a Is enn nen i eS, 2 aires re casi RREeENeaRIEE RO Tea ae + -_ = ida ain? sane ae +B) 45 § ie {a ] nt 4 bedi ees taal wht wat lk ies 1. ivy tour ‘ey i " “id } i mihi ee ee a A eae iB: Heh ll es : i oie fiat | a : _ at f rand Ai 1 ; : pet i] 1) H. tas bel by bi eae } : alrieae P the ie Week if { ' ' Lei ae } 1 b tah) i { a t! i biel : t i fi fe / ql 4 \ oT) (hae i } 1 es f puew : ay 89 ; | ri 1 ' i 3 i i” j 4 i "| i . ae ii { ite | i i | \Pl , | i i" |) h il ira i 4 i” | | tl sega sa one a tag So EN NST RTT PS gS : a aac 2 = : ao Peeeren ids oe = Bae 2 Mag aetna = aster at a 844 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. first year ending July 31, 1873, was $8,824.80, including the salary of the superintendent which was $1,200. One remarkable thing about the text books introduced was that Quackenbos’ History of the United States was used instead of Stephens’. Three new school buildings were completed in the fall and early winter of 1878, and one, on McCallie Avenue, in 1879. At the present time there are three buildings used for white children and four for colored, two main buildings and two others. Statistics indicate the growth and development of the schools in the most concise form, hence the history of the schools in Chattanooga is mainly presented in figures. From 1874. to 1878, inclusive, the statistics are based upon a census of scholastic population from six to eighteen years of age, and since 1878 on a basis of from six to twenty-one. In 1874 the scholastic population of Chattanooga was, white, 1,471; colored, 908; in 1875—white, 1,474: colored, 812; in 1876—white, 1,390; colored, 927; in 1877 white, 1,538; colored, 883; in 1878—white, 1,652; colored, 870. In 1874 the number of different pupils enrolled was, white, 968; colored, 614; in 1875—white, 1,033; colored, 641; in 1876—white, 1031; colored, 599: in 18 7—white, LAO Gre colored, 642, and in 1878—white, 1,155; colored. 684. The per cent of attendance on number belonging was, in 1874, 92.86; in 1875, 95.44; in 1876, 92.47; in 1877 (, 93.24. and in 1878, 94.69. The scholastic population since 1878 has been as follows: in 1879— white, 1,799; colored, 1,008; in 1880—white, 1,961; colored, 1,100; 1881—white, 2,058; colored, 1,166; 1882—white, 2,178; colored, 1,230; 1883—white, 2,544; colored, 1,385; 1884—white, 2,754; colored, 1,787 1885—white, 2,999; colored, 2,059; 1886—white, 3,366; colored, 2,512. The number of different pupils enrolled was, in 1879 white, 1,225; colored, 662; in 1880—white, 1,357; colored, 828; in 1881—white, 1,480; colored, 854; 1882—white, 1, 638; colored, 942; 1883—white, 1,478; colored, 666; 1884—white, 1,942. colored, 1,104; 1885—white, 2,095; colored, 1, 363: 1886—white, 2,125; colored, 1,469. The per cent of attendance on number belonging was, in 1879, 94.41; in 1880, 94.48; 1881, 93.46; 1882, 93.62; 1883, 93. 33; 1884, 93.15; 1885, 93.24; 1886, 91.58. The oa of tuition for each pupil Belen was 1n 1874, $11.87; in 1875, $16.75; 1876, $13.29: 1877 , 11.07; 1878, $9.85; 1879, $9.42; 1880, $9.08; 1881, $10.12. 1882, 810. Os 1883, $16.09; 1884, 11.22; 1885, $12.11; 1886, $11.93. The average salary paid teachers was in 1874. $491.60; 1875, $596.60; 1876 9497. 20; 1877, per month, $01.66; 1878, $51.96; 1885, $54. 64; 1886, $51.70. The entire cost of *Y ears omitted, omitted from report of superintendent.ee: tess Ali htse _ — Se eR AN me ee om a ee a te oe a s STN geen ORR ORES TE nen - a _ net ce cau eataeeenspeaienontaparigeeesr magnet ee er ee ee “aae deenaics a oe ra» ere a ee as » me Mies Deanery Mccel ann 5a coat pene Meieeogte apa perience are ee pee od Nehear haat ge oe aM ad eee eos "i Sal SATIS "= a ee 7 nd Se gt NBII ae = SERGE ra Ne Sa Aer EASE oes ee aes an 5 a Be ae pane, oe = = — ; 7 —- oem sie pa ao Re 8 = : —— x % Zane aor Somer EISLER t | i : Wp? 1p ee ae } X iHAMILTON COUNTY. 845 conducting the schools of Chattanooga, including purchases of real estate and improvements since 1873, has been as follows: in 1874, $21,378.55; 1875; $18,008.58; 1876, $17,620.25; 1877, $15,884.39: 1878. $19,182.74: 1879, $15,384.42; 1880, $17,834.06; 1881, $21.528.80: 1882, $24,722.08 1883, $27,133.47; 1884, $28,478.73; 1885, $26,921.69; 1886. ¢__ The common schools are divided into eight grades, four in the pri- mary and four in the grammar department, the eighth grade being the lowest and the first the highest, the colored schools being graded the same as those for white children. In 1886 the number of white pupils in the first grade of the grammar schools was 65 and of colored pupils 12. The high school was established in 1874 with P. VY. Livingston, principal. At the end of the first scholastic year the total enrollment was 30; in 1876 it was 40; in 1877, 38; 1878. 39- 1879. a9; 1880, 58: Sol G2; 1882) 60); 1883. 6b; 1884, 79. 188b. O4e 1seE Ge) umne course of study in the high school comprises three years of two terms each, during which six terms are devoted to Latin, three to aloebra, two to geometry, four to German, one to rhetoric, one to geology and two to philosophy, elocution and music being pursued throughout the course. The first class graduated from the high school in 1879, consisting of 5 scholars. A class of 15 graduated in 1883, 18 in 1884, 14 in 1885. and 20 in 1886, one of whom was a colored girl. The entire number of oO graduates from the high school is 65. The latest addition to the educational institutions of Chattanooga is the Chattanooga University. In 1871 the conception of a central uni- versity for the Holston, Central, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Blue Ridge and Virginia Conferences of the Methodist Kpiscopal Church was formed in the minds of some of the leading divines of that church. In course of time this idea gained such force that a committee was raised to select a location for such a university. This committee visited Chatta- nooga, Knoxville and Athens, and after a careful examination of the advantages of each place expressed their preference for the three places in the order named, Chattanooga being the first choice, in part at least, because of its being the converging point of more railroads than any other city within the limits of the interested conferences. These conferences subsequently approved the choice of the committee and referred the whole matter to the Freedmen’s Aid Society. However, the final decision was reserved until after the arts of coyness and coquetry, judiciously xercised by the locating committee upon all three of the cities, had sufficiently aroused the citizens of Chattanooga to the danger of losing the university, unless they should raise a sufficient amount of money to purchase at least a site for the institution. On October 6, 1881, a meet- : 53 > J ier eee yee ——_ = ae LER!" LENS ae RAR ATO goats 3 es - ee. ee we am SE id i ee = —- ona Linen abana kes Pei : se ee TW Lee ¢ ITT, re = cst hacer 5 oe meet en en a : le - —_— = Fs ; - = “ ae : ; cont sie seled nausea aotieeat - } “, et ? re =e z a Maitre fe a Ss * j a SI RTRE RTT A) ca er Lacs M Se a ri —o— mT 3 5 ; es 5 r = ies y ~ a Re oF - ae ~* nena Tiel So Ai Ug niece nh AD, Soa Rn ana eT on some TRIS Rg een Sip AMP os ae yoanmrenst = ee ees ar a ‘ ST Fe te - - wre - Sag RT a See eT Se Lay aie et Secu ses AE Ns nae EEEE peennctrate-naneeineaan sans aeons eeprom er er = pee = : SSS ees . os Se SEBAT aT eS Na ma department. 846 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ing of the citizens was held in the rooms of the Iron, Coal & Manufac- turers’ Association to take the necessary steps for the raising of this fund. Mayor Hart, who presided, announced that the university could be pecuned! provided the city would donate to its trustees from five to ten acres of ground. Committees in the different wards were appointed to solicit subscriptions of money for the purchase of the site and at length $15,000, the sum required, was raised. In December, 1882, the com- mittee to finally locate the university held a meeting, and it was found that ten out of fifteen of the committee favored Chattanooga. At a meeting held at the Read House in July, 1883, the negotiations that had been pending for the purchase of a site were closed by the purchase for $30,000 of the “Sheffield Property,” containing 10.85 acres of ‘land. The land consisted of two parcels, the first bounded as follows: north by Vine Street, east by Baldwin, south by Oak and west by Douglas Street; and the second as follows: north by Oak, east by Baldwin, south by Me- Callie and west by Douglas Street. The property was purchased in 1867 by Joseph E. Sheffield, who in 1868 transferred it to his sons, G.S. J. and ©. J. Sheffield, who sold it as above indicated to the Freedmen’s Aid Society for the purposes of the university. The building erected upon this site is a handsome four-story brick structure with a stone basement, 120 feet long by 100 feet in depth, and contains over eighty rooms with every modern convenience, the entire cost being $90,000. September 15, 1886, was the first day of the first term of the educa- tional life of this institution, and the dedication occurred on October 25. Bishop J. M. Walden read the historical address, and Bishop W. F. Mal- lalieu, of New Orleans, delivered the dedicatory oration. On that day it was announced that there were 175 students enrolled, and the insti- tution was looked upon as having attained a phenomenal success. The university is divided into five schools—academiec, collegiate, theologi- cal, musical and art. The classical course in the collegiate school coy- ers four years of study, while all the other courses in this and the other departments or schools require but three years. The first faculty of this institution was as follows: Rey. E. S. Lewis, A. M.., acting president and dean of the college of liberal arts; Rey. J. J. Manker, D. D., dean of ‘the theological school and professor of systematic theology; Wilford ‘Caulkins, A. M., secretary and professor of ancient languages; Rey. W W. Hooper, A. M., treasurer and professor of natural science; Mrs. Mary M. Presnell, M. E. L., preceptress and professor of English literature; Edward A. Robertson, W. B., instructor in mathematics; Rev. Robert Steudel, B. D., professor of modern languages; Frank R. Adams, direetor of the musical department, and Mrs. R. G. Steudel, director of the artHAMILTON COUNTY. 847 Almost upon the threshold of its existence the faculty of this institu- tion was confronted with a question of considerable importance, viz.: that of the right of colored students to matriculation and education within its walls. Two young colored men applied for admission and were refused and subsequently three young colored women applicants were likewise refused. The probability is that all were instigated to apply for the purpose of testing the position of the authorities of the university upon this question. The rejection of these colored applicants at once gave rise to earnest discussion of the question as to the right of the institution to use Freedmen’s Aid Society property and funds for the exclusive education of white students, and the decision of this question must rest upon a correct understanding as to what were the objects or ends for which the Freedmen’s Aid Society was established. These ends can be clearly perceived only by reference to the constitution and pream- ble thereto of the Freedmen’s Aid Society. The preamble is in the fol- lowing words: WHEREAS: The usefulness and success of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the South requires the maintenance and success of various grades of schools among the freed- men; and WHEREAS: There is no specific provision by benevolent organization in our church, to meet this special educational work of the freedmen; we, the ‘‘ General Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church, do therefore organize this Society under the following Con- stitution, with the name and for the purpose therein declared: CONSTITUTION. ARTICLE I. This organization shall be known asthe Freedmen’s Aid Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church. ARTICLE II. Its object shall be to labor for the education and special aid of freedmen and others, especially in co-operation with the Missionary and Church Extension Societies of the Methodist Episcopal Church. From the above preamble and Article II of the constitution, it is per- fectly clear that the main object of the Freedmen’s Aid Society is to edu- cate the freedmen, and were it not for the presence in Article If of the words “and others,” it is likewise perfectly clear that its educational work under its constitution would have been exclusively among the freed- men. If the words “and others” are applied without reference to the primary objects of the Society, they embrace all classes needing educa- tion, both black and white, and this is the construction placed upon Arti- cle II by those in charge of this institution. There is no doubt that this construction would hold if both races were admitted to the institution, but it is at least questionable whether an exclusively white school is author- ized if at all only by an extremely strained and imaginary construction JNeet renter eters icine as - a SIS —— =F eaten - nat L gelamig iat 7 . a carmen 1 rena marty enna nS ei ei eearenaee ae RP eT a ce rn tide eee sen ee eg ey - -- = - _- ~ - —— - TENNESSEE. HISTORY OF 848 of the constitution. In 1884 the general conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church adopted the following resolution: This General Conference declares the policy of the Methodist Episcopal Church to be that no member of any society within the church shall be excluded from public worship in any and every-edifice of the denomination; and no student shall be excluded from in- struction in any and every school under the supervision of the church, because of race, color or previous condition of servitude. The conference, however, also resolved that the question of mixed schools was one of expediency to be left to the choice and administration of those on the ground and more immediately concerned and it is upon these slender threads of authority that the university is justified in ex- cluding colored students. But there is no doubt that in the present state of public opinion regarding the eoeducation of the-two races, a university at Chattanooga for such purpose is an impracticability; hence the dilemma is presented of an exclusively white institution or none. The lesson to be learned from the initial experience of Chattanooga University is this—that in drafting rules, laws or constitutions, equivocal terms should be avoided. The city of Chattanooga, although having no elegant church edifices before 1881, yet from 1540 has had church organizations with such modest and inexpensive structures as the members could afford to build, the first building ever used for religious service being the log schoolhouse at the eorner of Fifth and Lookout Streets. now claim to have had the first church organization in Chattanooga, but The Cumberland Presbyterians the earliest exact date that is obtainable upon which a church was organ- ized is June 21, 1840, when the foundations were laid of the First Pres- byterian Church. Following are the names of some of the first members: W. W. Anderson, Robert M. Hooke, Henry Jones, Elizabeth Jones, John Vail, Lucy A. McFarland, William Smith, Caroline L. Smith, Mary L. Hooke, Ainsworth E. Blunt and John P. Long. erected atthe corner of Third and Walnut Streets. This building,which was A church building was the first ever used in Chattanooga exclusively for religious purposes, was subsequently sold and the lot was exchanged about the year 1853, for a lot on the corner of Market and Seventh Streets, upon which a brick church was erected at a cost of $10,000, some of the largest contributors to this fund being Thomas McCallie, Dr. William S. Townsend, Robert M. Hooke, William Smith and James A. Whiteside. At that time this building was considered a large and elegant structure. In 1882 this property was sold and a new site secured on the corner of Georgia Avenue and Seventh Street, upon which an elegant and convenient church building was erected, the lot and church costing about $35,000. edifice occurred September 28, 1885. The dedication of this new Following is a list of the pastorsHAMILTON COUNTY. 849 of the church with the dates of the commencement of their pastorates: Rev. William Cunningham, 1840; Rey. William B. Brown, 1844; Rey. A. Blackburn, 1850; Rev. William Thompson, 1851; Rev F. A. Ross, DD e6hb5:) Rev. JN. Bradshaw. 1856° Rev Hy McCallie (Dy De 1862, and Rev. J. W. Bachman, D. D., present pastor, 1873. The Second Presbyterian Church was organized with fourteen members, September 3, 1871. The first pastor was Rey. W. A. Rice. The Rev. J. C. Irwin was called April 1, 1875, and the present pastor, Rey. W. J. Trimble, began his labors April 1, 1879. The church building stands on the northeast corner of West Eighth and Chestnuts Streets, and is worth, with the lot upon which it stands, about $20,000. The church organization also owns a mission property worth $3,000. The Sunday- school was organized with thirty scholars in 1871, the superintendents having been Willard Abbott, T. C. Stewart, W. J. Trimble, Wiliam Powell and C. D. Mitchell in the order given. The membership of the church is now 205, and of the Sunday-school 175. The window in the church commemorative of the death of Miss Hattie Ackerman, a heroine and victim of the yellow fever epidemic, is a model of artistic skill and beauty. The Cumberland Presbyterian Church was started probably in 1841, but the organization was not permanent, lasting only two or three years. The first pastors were the Rey. William B. Dawson and Rey. Aaron Grigsby, synodical missionaries. It was revived October 10, 1855, Revs. A. Templeton and Hiram Douglass being the prime movers. The fol- lowing were the elders: Hugh McGill and Allen A. Kennedy. The Rey. A. Templeton remained as pastor until the breaking out of the war. Previous to 1858 the congregation worshiped in a little building on Cypress Street, between Sixth and Seventh Streets, at which time they moved to their present building on Chestnut Street, between Seventh and Righth, which cost about $3,000. During the war they were with- out a pastor, and the church was occupied by the United States Army as a kind of arsenal. An attempt was made by a Southern soldier to blow it up while it was thus used. but the soldier was himself killed while making the attempt. At the close of the war, at the instance of W. L. Dugger, the Government repaired the damages to the building caused by its occupancy. ‘The first pastor after the war was the Rev. EH: J. Stock- ard, who came in 1867, remaining only a lew months. He was succeeded in January, 1868, by the Rev. N. W. Motheral, who remained until 1870. The Rev. John Grisman then came and remained one year. The next was the Rev. William D. Chadick from 1871 to 1877; then the Rev. Thomas Toney, pastor, one year; then the Rev. Dr. William H. Darnallrete an = h Fa cst wo 2 . : pind ple Se - FO ar Eat ang BEE a tat align eee Sake epiyiontem sa Ag ae ie = 4 a = a, ae oan aiomperta ea em pire yeh ~ calla erecta. y os saphow = sae SR Ale ere", ae oe il Pe emronclrasretp ae oe z i Se pee = — = : 4 == cet ent EO te ae oa ey ae mW dis I i my Fp RNR cree = {Taso TS Serre ie —— er yeep —so = —_ = —. pa ee 2 ies wea ts Chae: ae oT rte : Php ere ar ctareeesinnt 5 <= ag PR er Pan SA ne Senet TE cee A me te em pa —— waren ee RE an 2 oP TRE See Ce Sage eo : ened Serene eR. . — eae - re Saree pene SFR A NICE re pI adi ote innate 3 ae isa Gia caller siete > easier akatgiaahet beatnik eave E oor ee ae plore penne 5 eget eee eae " reeset: sts nen ate: ines retary eee eee ereeereeeene S52 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. denomination in the county being estimated to be worth $200,000. Fol- lowing are the names of the preachers: T. C. Warner, D. D.; T. C. Carter, 1D) ee J. J. Manker, D. D.; E. S. Lewis, J. J. Shingler, J. S. Jones, R. M. Marshal, I. V. Miller, S. Hawkins, W. W. Hooper and J. J. Robinette. Of the thirty organizations twelve belong to the colored people. The Christian Church was established in 1871, by a small number of people collected by the Rev. Dr. Hopson, then of Louisville, Ky., who, on the 21st of November of the above named year, concluded a course of lectures, delivered with the view of organizing a church of that denomina- tion in Chattanooga. The church at first contained twenty-one members, nine of whom had been converted and baptized bya Dr Hopson during his two weeks’ stay in the city. The church thus organized held services at various places, at one time ina small school building in the rear of the Episcopal Church, on Highth Street. At length in 1882 they bought alot on Walnut Street, between Seventh and Eighth Streets, 50x82 feet in size, at a cost of $1,325, which is now worth $5,000, and in 1884 commenced the erection of a church, now completed, except the basement. This building was built at an expense of $10,000, at a great personal sacrifice to the members. It was dedicated November 10, 1886, by Elder R. Moffat, assisted by Elder T. D. Butler. The present membership of the church is 188. The following is a list of the pastors of this church: A. Allison, G. W. Abell, J. BR. Biggs, F. M. Hawkins, A. G. Thomas, A. S. Johnson, D. T. Buck and T. D. Butler. who became pastor September 1, 1884, and retired from the church September 1, 1886. The Sunday-school contains 170 scholars. The present officers are, trus- tees, G. B. Woodworth, D. W. Chase and Mr. Post; secretary and treas- urer, Dr. D. E. Nelson. SS. Peter and Paul Catholic Church was established in Chattanooga in 1852, the first baptism of a child, occurring February 10 of that year, being performed by Rev. Henry Vincent Brown—this baptism indicating the time at about which the congregation was organized by this priest. The Rey. Mr. Brown visited the laborers along the railroads, most of whom were Irish, and was instrumental in encouraging them to congre- gate around his mission and to procure homes for themselves at the mere trifle at which they could then be procured. When the war came on it for the most part upset his plans. An Irishman named Daniel Hogan, filled with religious zeal, desirous of erecting a church building, gave to it the land now owned by this church, at the corner of Georgia Avenue and Gilmer Street. A stone structure was commenced and was built up to the eaves when work upon it was checked by the war, and the stones in the wall utilized in the erection of the stone fort. Since then no work nisi 6.HAMILTON COUNTY. 853 has been done toward completing the edifice, the organization considering it best to wait until the final decision.of the Government upon their claim for damages, which it expects will soon come in the form of an allowance, as on the 19th of March, 1886, the House Committee reported favorably upon the claim of $18,700. Rey. Father Brown was succeeded by Rey. Father J. T. Nealis, who remained but a short time and was followed by Rev. Father P. Ryan, who built the parsonage, and who died from yellow fever in 1878. Father Ryan introduced two Dominican Sisters from the St. Cecilian Academy at Nashyille,in 1876, who in that year took charge of the Academy Notre Dame de Lourdes, which has been so successful that in 1886 a fine three-story brick school building was erected at a cost of $12,000, andthe school contains about 250 scholars. Rey. Father P. J. Gleeson was transferred from Clarksville to this church in July, 1885, and since coming to Chattanooga he has purchased a site of forty-s1x acres on the east side of Missionary Ridge for a cemetery, to which were re- moved in November, 1886, the remains of Father Ryan. The church now (November, 1886) consists of about 200 families. The Jewish Synagogue is located on Walnut Street near Fifth. For some years previous to 1882, there had been a Jewish congregation in Chattanooga, and in that year they completed their present synagogue, dedicating it in September. Rev. Julius Ochs, who was then the rabbi, delivered a very fine address, and was assisted in the dedicatory services by Rey. Dr. E. Schrieber, of Mobile, Ala., who delivered an able address on the theme, ‘“‘Shema Israel.” After a short address by Dr. R. M. Wise the exercises closed. The building is of brick, neatly and plainly con- structed and will seat about 300 persons. St. Paul’s Episcopal Church is located at the southwest corner of Chestnut and West Highth Streets, and St. John’s Episcopal Church is located on the west side of Cameron Hill, near the Roane Iron Works. Both organizations are doing excellent work in the mission and hospital fields of labor. St. John’s Church was consecrated February 19, 1882, by the bishop of Tennessee, assisted by the rector of St. Paul’s Church and the Rev. J. H. T. LaRoche, of Sewanee. After the Bishop had de- livered the sermon of consecration, he paid a deserved tribute to Miss E. L. Buckler, who had raised the money for building the echureh edifice upon ground given to the mission by the Roane Iron Company. The mission had been in existence four years, and had held services ina small chapel. The new building, which is capable of seating 300 people, to- gether with the furniture and fixtures, cost $2,000. The chancel win- dows were presented by Grace Church, New York, and the font by Mas John Minturn, of New York, who also assisted Miss Buckler in raising the money to build the church.SS ge ee — —e — me ee ale see oe eas i ee i nr oe eee oe s = - ane ae. aes tvadsaecerecami re 2: era ae es : ae > 3s ars x = geuperataens < Si ecient ced ena ees ae o . } ene RE See iB a ay erty =e — aie Siete nee ee ig i il : ; , 2 Hy u abaed aaa Ft Hat ae Pa eA i satin ui ie 4 tha j i i Hae Tad) eet at if ie 1 Fiieee | ae ea Hi Bp cides ea i Hae} 1 Ei ah SS POR Ss seine raga ie me eae ST _. See 854 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The First Baptist Church is located on the southeast corner of East Sixth and Walnut Streets. and a commodious frame house of worship. It has a large and enterprising membership, The design is at present entertained of selling their present church property, and of building a more modern church, more on a par with the other newly erected church edifices in Chattanooga. The congregation was largely increased by the wise course of their late pastor, Rev. J. T. Christian, D. D., who was succeeded by the present pastor, Rev. M. M. Wamboldt, whose zeal, eloquence and excellent Christian character are fully appreciated by the ehurch. The Second Baptist Church is located at 1004 Cowart Street, in the manufacturing center of the city, and is a strong and growing congrega- tion. The present pastor is the Rev. L. N. Brock, a man of piety, zeal and never-tiring energy. The First Baptist Church (colored) is located at the corner of Tenth and B Streets. being only partially erected and covered in with a temporary wood roof. The pastor is the Rey. W. M. Washington. Shiloh Baptist Church (eolored) is also making considerable progress. The building is not yet completed, the walls of stone The First Congregational Church (colored) is located on the west side of A Street, south of East Ninth Street. It was organized with sixteen members, June 9, 1867, with Rev. BE. O. Tade. pastor, who re- His successor was Rey. A. C. Ellis, who was followed in 1874 by Rev. E. B. Sellers, by Rev. Temple Cutler, in 1876, and by the present pastor, Rev. Joseph EK. Smith, in 1879. mained six years. The American Mis- sionary Association aided this organization until 1883, since when it has been self-sustaining. It now has property worth $20,000, The colored people sustain numerous other churches in Chattanooga. Chattanooga lies on the south of the Tennessee River (strictly speaking, on the east bank, as there the river flows in a southerly direc- tion), not far from what might be termed the central point of converg- ing mountain ranges—Walden’s Ridge, Lookout Mountain and Mission- ary Ridge, or just above where the river breaks through between Wal- den’s Ridge and Lookout Mountain, in longitude 85° 14’ west from Greenwich and in north latitude 35° 4’. Previousto receiving its present name, it was known as Ross’ Landing, Ross Warehouse, or Ross Ferry, these names having been applied indifferently for about twenty-five years, during most of which time the entire region in view from Lookout Point was a wooded wilderness, with only here and there an Indian’s cabin and patch of truck. Rossville was for a long time the postoffice. When, in 1836, the Cherokee lands began to be settled by whites, and tradeHAMILTON COUNTY. 855 sprang up in the various products of their cultivated settlements, Ross’ Landing, the principal landing on the river, became the nucleus of a town, and when, in 1838, the settlers were enabled to acquire titles to the lands they had held by the right of occupancy, a town was laid out at the Landing, lots were sold in April, 1839, and the future Chattanooga began her race for prosperity, wealth and renown. Ross’ Landing, besides becoming the center of trade for the immediate vicinity, also became the center of the salt trade for Kast Tennessee and north Alabama. ‘The salt sold here was made at King’s Salt Works, in Virginia, and at times of freshets, floated in flatboats down the north fork of the Holston, and so on down the Tennessee River to Ross’ and other landings. This company, having a monopoly of the salt trade in this part of the country, sold salt at their ow: prices through agents stationed at the various landings along theriver. In 1838, 1,500 barrels of salt were sold at an average price of $8 per barrel. Thus commenced the settlement and the commerce of Chattanooga—of the future great- ness of which the early settlers had no prophetic vision, and while these small beginnings were being made, a “chief” was among them taking notes which he printed in the Chattanooga Gazette, but unfortunately the printed notes can not be rescued from oblivion. In 1836 a military post was established here, looking to the removal of the Indians at the expiration of the two years’ grace given them by the treaty of New Echota. In April, 1837, a postofiice was established by the name of Ross’ Landing, with John P. Long as postmaster. At first, not being on any post route, it was only a special office, the mail to be supplied from Rossville, Ga., by special contract. Some months afterward a tri- weekly line of four-horse post coaches. was established between Augusta Ga.. and Murfreesboro, Tenn., which added so greatly to the mail facili- ties at Ross’ Landing, that letters could be received from Washington in ten days, then considered remarkably quick time. After the extinguishment of the Indian title to the land, the interest therein passed to the State of Tennessee for the use of the public schools, and to make the proceeds of this land available the Legislature, on the 29th of November, 1837, passed an act creating the Ocoee land district, and establishing a land office at Cleveland. According to the provision of this act lands in this district could be entered at $7.50 per acre and ‘‘who- soever was in possession of and residing upon any piece of land at the passage of said act should have a pre-emption or priority of entry for the term of three months over other persons, and if two or more persons were residing on the same quarter section, they should have a joint pret- erence of entry on said quarter section. ; : 4 —~reper irnpetionee = = Ses = Pst — oes te eee ee tee oe eee ee = = Meer eter Sacaie aeRO aaa a Pees AR etn ORT ATION eR Kg ee ee 856 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. At the time of the passage of this act there were residing upon the = northeast quarter of Section 29, second fractional township, fourth range west, twenty-eight persons and upon the southeast fractional quarter (eighty acres of Section 20), twenty-five persons who were entitled to a joint preference of entry on their respective tracts of land. Those liv- ing on the quarter section were James W. Smith, John P. Long, Samuel Williams, Wiliam M. Davis, Matthew -Frazier, Eliza Russell. Joseph Ellis, Abner Witt, John Keeney, John A. Porter, George B. Gwathmey, Samuel H. Davis, Ezekiel Price, Lewis Webb. Ailsey Cape, Abram Perry, Joseph Rice, Thomas W. Munsey, Berry Jones, Isaac Baldwin, E. H. Freeman, Charles Grigsby and six others. Those on the fraction were David G. Perry, Allen Kennedy, William Long, 8S. S. M. Doak, B. K. Hudgins, Matthias Williams, Matthew Hillsman, D. A. Wilds, William Hill, —— Cathey, I. T. Mathis, William Thurman, Nathan Harris, —— Thrail- kill, Cary A. Jones, William B. Gilleland, James W. Tunnell. Jane Hen- derson, M. W. Legg, William G. Sparks and five others. All of those living on the quarter section or their assignees transferred their right of occupancy to three commissioners or trustees; A. M. Rawlings, John P. Long and George W. Williams, and most of those on the fraction transferred their rights to Allen Kennedy, R. A. Ramsey and Albert S. Lenoir, the duty of these commissioners being to enter the land, to have a town laid off, to make deeds to each respective occupant, to designate certain lots for the use of churches, to convey the lots so designated to the churches, and to sell the balance of the lots to the highest bidder and to divide the net proceeds among the interested parties. In the summer of 1838 the town was laid off into lots by Josiah Patty of Roane County, and was bounded on the north by the Tennessee tiver, on the east by Georgia Avenue, on the south by James Street and on the west by the foot of Cameron Hill. The commissioners for those living on the quarter section entered said quarter November 7, 1838, by entry No. 98, on which a grant, No. 22, was issued by the State, Decem- ber 3, following. The commissioners for the fraction also obtained a grant for that tract. Soon after the survey and platting of the town several of the princi- pal citizens assembled in the log schoolhouse standing on the corner of Fifth and Lookout Streets, for the purpose of naming the new town, soon to be much more than a mere landing. There were from fifteen to twenty persons present at the meeting, at which various names were suggested: Albion, because of the white cliffs on Walden’s Ridge; Monte- video, because of the mountains in view from the location ; Videopolis, suggested by James A. Whiteside, because of the city to be visible inHAMILTON COUNTY. S57 the future from the mountains, and Chattanooga, by John P. Long, because this ‘‘ was the name of a valley and a creek, and was said to have been the original name of Lookout Mountain, given to all these before the country was occupied by the Cherokees, and from antiquity the meaning had been lost.’”’ This name was adopted by the meeting and the future manufacturing center and historic city of the South thus became ‘“Chat- tanooga.” How Chattanooga became the manufacturing center and historic city of the South remains to be related. Mr. Long says the meaning of the name Chattanooga had been lost from antiquity. Some say the original signification of the word was ‘*‘ Hawk’s nest,” others say ‘““Crow’s nest,” and still others “ Eagle’s nest.”” With reference to these meanings the following extract from Van Horne’s “ History of the Army of the Cumberland” is to the purpose. “A somewhat similar name* was applied by the Cherokees to the cliffs, rising boldly from the river above the town, which was derived from Clanoowah, the name of a warlike but diminutive hawk, which was supposed to embody the spirit of the tribe. These cliffs were the pri- vate nesting-place of the bird, and hence a name was given which ex- pressed this fact, and which perhaps has suggested the myth that ‘Chat- tanooga’ means “ eagle’s nest.” The same authority says that originally Chattanooga was the name of a small Indian hamlet situated near the base of Lookout Mountain, on the bank of Chattanooga Creek, and that in the Cherokee language it means “to draw fish out of water.’ It was therefore applied to their small hamlet on the creek, to the creek itself and to the valley. ‘The humble hamlet has disappeared, and its name,suggestive and appropriate at first, was inherited by the town of the white man with meaningless application,” because the white man did not know its meaning. The acceptation of this explanation excludes the very plausible theory of John W. James, that the word, originally spelled “ Chat-a-nu-ga,”’ was sug- gestive of the general topography of the country, and meant “broken mountains.”’ The three principal landings along the river were Ross’, Gunter’s, and Ditton’s. In December, 1838, the name of the postoffice at the for- mer was changed to Chattanooga, and on the 20th of April, 1839, the lots on the quarter section were sold, except forty, the proceeds of the sale approximating ¢45.000. The sale of the lots on the fraction did not occur until after several years. Recurring to the early trade of the city it may be stated that the “Atlas” was the first steamboat that navigated the Tennessee above the Muscle Shoals. The Atlas was commanded by ; a . Came ae ea eats ere } , *Similar to Chattanooga.27ers aS en ba enn nT aee Rare E SE ae coag ee. pen catalina ioe eae — me = ie ee vem : Pa ees SG ne adie ea ad (3 a. THe ome, th: ay exit | it | i Ghee gett) Al aac ie ft ipray! ean (han a ines a i vee I anes ©) eae ; As i) aati (| Ae Ta iG ek eeaeem ees Hal . i i Hy Lh iH ie Pe Geer ay ah: “ered ee es | Se) weer a hae lias : mye HCH eel Ge es pas Cae A > i iy ij W4 4 UB Hideo Gb \ al ’ NN eerde anit if 1 ; Seb Ey { ' fe ‘ yh ‘ ot He ! eH Pua ad eee Pe | fats) ie ia Sav t Tart ry re Hania Boa ed bY iH oe i th et) Pee at i ie $ e feats i i) ; a Fi ie \ f { F at aaa ; i oa LB te { bbe ike a) ; ‘ i Oe Hae ABs a Bar a i | | te. tal Hl fas vee Pertliaiia : ete edie | Hi Need } a | i a 4 pal sib ® a | AA eeee |) Hae We } ike! i ‘| ra 4 r} a. "y if Wat ei ey i ia fe et} i et a aes Me a et wi ca PASS ee Feu Lt eas Pete tH] SpE Yi ee) fia] i iy ey tan avs | ew ier t Paal i f bed on i ek’ {i | ‘ i ia na ii at eve i ‘ | i] bees cite ie ; Ail Hera ; {i His } ied etapa ge ith pobae PHaeS iJ | ima Pea ei eat iia i Hae a rT raha At Hah i j ial Veateael & | i abet: ina) est | FEY i el | BE Abt RE eat iat pat | ' rt i ie 4 ap ' Wi a ayia i| } Bl a ee hil { ; | tt i Ai pee rH ai a ii Le t Hi bay st i i) | a | aay we ' | ihe 1 | SRA As Bae ; veh i fy i || EVRA RS | ; %| ri ly Nh bs N cE hit Potent Hy | : : Pu is Hh } 1 ae aay i i { ie eaten ip a ee TAN i ; fi My +P ‘| t ; - bye aE ay 4 ba t yi ~ Sa ee EE ek, = ~ a , ——— —— = ; Rn. seep adnamnednaetnaien memes — = ~~ Conon —— - ~- : a es angele =. gat ‘ -s — i paca LED ee ee pe SS Sara Sea SER gegen oa ae ee aa ; 7 ~ ne Seer ee = — _ 2 SOLAN con af Mr ae or . aa A ye pas Pie woe atest timc aoe - . ~ wre » shai aii 3 Rho aia a ¥ iS 235 a eT cory . = ng oe nen — - * " ‘~ aes " ay peer ae ~ | ‘ BE S i S 5 2 ‘a ein om ii tpl sit 3 a “thesis ae tinted Ln See ; ae ae im incest ser an mee ee ee Gah ST LTR TAP aoe peer | ~—-~- =~ a PROS ape 5 . (See idea aL ns . : s - ae eg =e : Ca. ae “i se ) > : — - “ = . . Sree ie = — . ke 4 “ = eink emiott = — 5 — ee = - nn wet rn ~ eae a Wee Ss Se gS Ie + : om ili 7 SS ee a ee HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. project was conceived and was being agitated of connecting Charleston with Cincinnati. held at Knoxville, July 4, 1836, at which delegates were present from In furtherance of this grand scheme a convention was Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. The route favored by a majority of this convention was that through the Appalachian chain of mountains by the way of Knoxville and the Cumber- land Gap, while the Georgia delegation, with Absalom Chappell at their head, contended for a more westerly route. Georgia was pushing her road northwest from Augusta to the Chattahoochee River, intending to continue that line northward to the Tennessee River, near Ross’ Landing, thence up the Tennessee Valley to some suitable gap in the Cumberland Mountains, and thence to Cincinnati. ‘This route was favored at Knox- ville by the Georgia delegation, but the convention adopted the more Jirect route via Knoxville and the Cumberland Gap. Upon the return home of the Georgia delegation they calléd a State convention to meet at Macon, which recommended a system of railroads for the State, and that the central point of this system should be east of the Chattahoochie River, now Atlanta, the Georgia Railroad to be con- tinued to that point, as also the Central Railroad from Savannah, the Macon & Western froin Macon, and a line not then built from Columbus; and the State was to build a single line from this central point to the Tennessee River. This general plan received the approval of the Legis- lature of Georgia, which passed an act in December, 1836, to build the Western & Atlantic Railroad from a point east of the Chattahoochee River to the northern boundary of the State at or near Rossville, and, with the consent of Tennessee, on to the Tennessee River. After many discouragements and much delay, the enterprise was completed, the road entered Chattanooga in 1849, and the first railroad train entered the town in December of that year. The tunnel, however, had not been built and passengers had to be transferred over the ridge at Tunnel Hill. The depot was located on Broad Street, according to an agreement with Thomas Crutchfield, who owned the land where the Read House now stands, and who as his part of the agreement was to build a hotel opposite. The hotel when erected was a small frame building and stood on the present site of the Read House. The depot then erected was used until 1858. The entrance of this first train into Chattanooga was an event big with great possibilities, and it was celebrated in a becoming manner. L. P. Parham, editor of the Chattanooga Gazette made a speech in which he said: ‘Iam full of this momentous occasion—too full for utterance. I have labored night and day for this enterprise. I was the first manHAMILTON COUNTY. 863 in Kast Tennessee to agitate the building of this road, and now I am happy to know it has been completed to Chattanooga,” ete. The growth of Chattanooga was comparatively slow before the war. In December, 1851, E. R. Mills, who was located here as agent for the Central and Macon & Western Railroads “‘ had the pleasure of informing the merchants and planters of North Alabama and Tennessee that the connection of the above roads at Macon is complete.” In*1852 there were in business in Chattanooga the following individuals and firms: John H. Newton, dry goods; H. S. Abrahams & Co., dry goods, groceries and liquors, ‘‘the cheapest store in Chattanooga;” C. E. Grenville & Co., commission and forwarding merchants, who charged for forwarding cotton 25 cents per bale; oats, 2 cents; corn, 24 cents; and wheat, 3 cents per bushel; J. Mitchell had just moved in from Gainesville, Ga., and opened a new tin shop; Cohen & Barrett were there and had been for some years conducting the ‘People’s Store;” Massengale, Avery & Co., general store ; Joseph Ramsey & Son were pork packers and dealers in bacon and lard; L. L. Thomasson was a general commission merchant “on the upper wharf boat;’ B. F. Tutt kept a drug store, and the ‘“‘ Tennessee River M. M. and Transportation Company's Express Line of Mail Steamers” ran daily between Chattanooga and Decatur, and were making tri-weekly trips to Knoxville. The city had become quite a commercial point, and at one time, in 1854, the accumulation of cotton over and above what the railroad could carry away was 10,000 bales. The city had then a popu- lation of about 4,000; there were four churches, and halls for the Masons, Odd Fellows and Sons of Temperance; but little had been done toward building up the schools. In 1845 a charter was granted to certain persons to build a rail- road from Chattanooga to Nashville, and after many obstacles had been encountered and surmounted by the projectors of the road it was com- pleted about 1850. This is now the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway, which, including both main lines to Hickman, Ky., 321 miles, and branches, 198 miles, is 519 miles in length. In 18583 what is now the Alabama Great Southern Railroad was chartered by Tennessee as the Wills Valley Railroad and by Alabama as the Nenibenat & Southwest Alabama. It was graded most of its length, and fifteen miles built and operated from Trenton, Ga., to Wauhatchie before the war, trains running into Chattanooga over the tracks of the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railroad until 1565, when the orig- inal franchises were merged into a charter granted to the Alabama & Chattanooga Railroad Company. This company Coes ane line to Meridian, Miss., May 17, 1871. On the first of January, 1871, defaulta vi 2 ee epg ee WC an ante a Ste LET - 3 ~ emai —— age | > = —— ee - ee 4 = = ¥ ra we ae i me Fil teem . pabare e: = seem > ane — - L cae Ta a Eanes wot, 2B ae mee oa Lr Te er San os a ot * me eaees = ee se ot <4 eaegueen Sui a — are ante ger Cake my eee ies pid He ihcaeamart pe tomy. aera ree - ——_ Po a a * r one ORE, ase spares oa meinen kag ona ee ae Se EAT PRR in pte ix ee — see a OO EH MAE seni ent air setiranns aetemeggeo ae ean Pace oe. —_ Si tS a me Page ae pelea =~ - ; as ; ~ TIL an a en el ae : s cape gue eT nt aged lpe aah ag RY = eee ee aN ee Ss Se = A RAI SS ee sai pf ner Se SE Cig RE — ae ES ees TTS BR4 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. was made on account of interest, and from that time to 1877, the history of this road is too intricate with lawsuits and sales, to find narration in this work. On January 22, 1877, it was sold to a company organized by the English holders of the bonds, and this company was fully organ- ized as the Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, November 30, 1877. Since then the roadbed has so improved that it is now one of the most semua! and safe in the country, and the entire length of the line is 296 miles The me & Charleston was originally projected by leading capital- ‘cts of Tennessee, South Carolina and the North. John C. Calhoun, in company with capitalists from his own State and New York, visited Chattanooga and went over the route to Memphis in 1804. The road was constructed from Memphis to Stevenson, a distance of 272 miles; and trains run over the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis, a distance of thirty-eight miles. This road was opened for business July 4, 1858. Tn 1836 the Hiwassee Railroad was chartered from Chattanooga to i. _ eb astro Pia pa PAE a ee _— ams a Rede eS: : r = x = “er rem “i aegis =. eel ~ ase ae oe eee ad — - ow en ; : The es aye “J PS as ; a 34a! * TE via } 1 : ae. =e , * suite a sae at CRY a tp ote aie i $e ty iy : a mys 14 Pak ‘ it ‘ PS ie Hate ye aie ft ; Reload tS ie Tie ae + KB les dibedee Palle { i! eae, i ‘ fs meee byt i al tee thee | 1 be kee pe ae | PS Gal eae bay # j F ‘ ; aye ie ; j | : Vth ae y ry ii ity 7 hy aM Fe 4y ca bast dh ft ii mal 1 ; al he hi Hh BS : 4 a = pita penee eeeeanaragede arate ——— eos “+ mae eye te Sess eee Sapa ea aan pTLA A TT ee bs c: epee a career it sz —— en: 5 cipal scene " ’ os oe Se ee sg ari era = es a a Spee aKa PSS Eg SS SSS a : a. ee ee eT ~ eas a - ee 3 pe Ta art ee ieee i . i . ” PRPC = — 866 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. merged into the chancery court of the county, as the law court was merged into the county circuit court. After the opening of the Western & Atlantic Railroad in 1849, Mr. Crayens, president of the Hast Tennessee Iron Manufacturing Company, moved from Roane County to Chattanooga and erected a foundry and machine shop for the manufacture of freight cars, and for doing general machine work. While conducting this enterprise he developed the fact that as good car wheels could be made from the cold blast charcoal iron of East Tennessee as could be made anywhere in the country. In time this establishment became the property of Thomas Webster. Other manufacturing establishments before the war were the following: I. G. By- num’s steam tannery, then the largest in the South; the pork packing establishments of Chandler & Co. and of Ramsey & Co.; the saw and planing-mill of McCallie, Marsh & Co.: Bell & Co.’s flouring-mill and distillery, the flouring-mill having a capacity of 150 barrels of flour per day, and the distillery of fifty barrels of whisky; C. EK. Grenville’s flouring-mill, with a capacity of fifty barrels per day, with others of minor note, untilin 1860 there were twenty establishments in all em- ploying a capital of $209,300. At this time the population of the city was 3,900, and for the next three or four years during the continuance of the civil war, the permanent population rather diminished than increased. The part taken by Chattanooga during that trying period is for the most part included in the account of Hamilton County’s participation in the war of the Rebellion, in this connection only a few dates of the arrival of troops, etc., being introduced. After the Tullahoma campaign, Gen. Bragg’s army entered Chatta- nooga during the first week of July, 1863, and on the 21st of August, Gen. Wilder, in company with Gen. G. D. Wagner, shelled the city from the north side of the river, causing it to be evacuated by the rebel troops to points beyond range of Wilder’s guns. On the 28th, William Crutchfield, a most intelligent, courageous, and useful scout, spy and guide for the Federal generals during their campaigns around Chatta- nooga, and a true blue Union man. having learned on the 26th of Septem- ber, from the conversation of two rebel quartermasters, the strength of Bragg’s army and his plan of campaign against Gen. Rosecrans, com- municated' this information to Gen. Wilder, who immediately telegraphed it by signal to Gen. Rosecrans who was about thirty miles below at Caper- ton’s Ferry. On the 7th and 8th of September Bragg’s army completed Qo their evacuation of Chattanooga, and Gen. Wilder entered it on the morning of the ninth. After the battle of Chickamauga, Gen. Rose- erans entered Chattanooga on the 20th of September, and his army re-CO on —l HAMILTON COUNTY. treated to that place immediately afterward. By orders from the War De- partment, promulgated October 19, Gen. Rosecrans was relieved from the command of the Army of the Cumberland, Gen. Thomas promoted to that command, and Gen. Grant assigned to the command of the ‘“ Military Division of the Mississippi.” On the 23d Gen. Grant arrived in Chat- tanooga taking command, and on the 24th he made a personal inspection of the positions occupied by the Army of the Cumberland. On the 23d of November, 120 pontons conveyed 83000 men of Sherman’s army corps down the Tennessee to the mouth of South Chickamauga Creek, Gen. Grant’s headquarters being during that day and the next at Wood’s Re- doubt. On the 25th Gen. Grant’s headquarters were in the morning on Orchard Knob, and in the evening after the victory of the Wnion Army on Missionary Ridge they were east of the crest of that ridge. The Forty-ninth Ohio, Colonel Gibson, arrived in Chattanooga on Sun- day, April 10, 1864. asalso did the Seventy-fourth Ohio, Colonel Given, and the Eighth lowa Cavalry,and on the 11th,the Twenty-third Indiana. The scout made by the Fourteenth Colored Regiment and then just completed, in which they had taken Pikeville, Sparta, Kingston and other places, ras highly praised. ‘The items in this paragraph are taken from the Chattanooga Daily Gazette of April 12, 1864, Volume I, No. 38, as is also. the following partial statement of the dilemma which then presented itself to President Jefferson Davis, and the other authorities of the Con- federate States: Unless they free the negro they have nothing left to fight with. If they free the negro they have nothing left to fight for. Ever since the Rebellion began negroes have been falling, Nevertheless their greatest fear now is that the negroes will rise. If Davis impresses food he turns the land into a desert; Unless he impresses food he turns his soldiers into deserters. If they fight they lose the day, and Unless they fight they lose every day. Before the occupation of Chattanooga by the army of Gen. Rosecrans, a paper was published by Franc M. Paul, called the Chattanooga Daily Rebel. No. 247 of Volume 1 appeared May 22. 1863. In this number there was an editorial on “ Jacobinism in the North” in which occurred the following paragraph: “So thoroughly is the Northern mind subject to the delusive principle that the sup- support of the Government, and so completely has the port of the administration is the of free thought which once animated the dominion of the bayonet subjugated the impulse heart of the country, that little can be expected from the resistance of the people, leader- There is no great chieftain among them. Judge Douglass is dead, but he was not a game man. Vallandigham has not the capacity nor the prestige; Horatio Seymour is an old woman; John Van Buren was bought for a trifle; Fernando Wood is only a local politician, and McClellan the great unhorsed, has proven himself to contain more of the “‘little” than of the ‘““Napoleon.”’ There is in fact no man among less, armless, objectless.+ Sa - Fe eae PMN a oS aan ee ee ee SF Re a ie ES eA mR a gett Mi ae ee = Sofa Sa ui ee PTET Te AER EE = = ~ : ons nero m eatin Fite nea —— — ; 7 os ie ai ema peered a RATER IR rh yo “ anne oP hae aA MEET poe scunr ene Han ger ~ oon i tere he i \s es eo ft } ef E 1 1) al Bas Da! | | Aah ad | eat : EE! b Beebe! Bite : ; : h * y be 4 | eit i: aa: i iB, a ie . ; 2 as ae iat St a : i) t | Pil eee; Sl ae { : ; ave ‘ F baal iiftced: Med ; t ge ei) j ; ! ‘ i : eae t4a t : ¥ hf ] ; iEehs : I } mie 1 to ‘3 i ‘ % 14 ai ihe : 12 j panei) ae fit ss ay ay i et Ef Pa | ' ' +) ‘4 te eet Wo) Ber 4} Hee eps He? ' ; why } hee ba: Bel ; } } i Gut hype Bl te i? } ‘ ; ys Ag oe 14 7 ey 1 d % \ BD | i hee) Gan Vy f eel otmeeelt Gat a2 { "4 | oy eras +a ; 1 : a e i t 4 : a” bays ri 5 i fat. | x 1 é a ' r ‘ ; 3 aa} adi a f pt hai ft i 1 (Rees, eh t " : ‘ { : ‘s) : \ : ia} ied eee alia) Ch a ee Ae 4 fi \@ 1 ¥ eae te a a t | : nt a f Shag i ai j « Rie ty ( i gaan fan ; i 5 tha) Lit eaeae Bye ; ht ie. Baris i ' me , ii c a aa lal 148 wal mh |? ‘a y Hy ie Tale Bre he ; Ale 1 i ye Se ‘ oh ‘ Be st ai} : ahi , Ht} hi ! 4 Seow | Nae ce Pe i Aba SR hh e. : i ‘ ; TEE i +i 7h) { i nih} Lalas tee Bl! eke; ms a } ee! i ae rats eee, - ~ —-- — tae Se = _ —--—- = a — - ~ - c— a = ro gas ine ro Tig ong ae : > Ten - Sa em oes mince meena re = ae , - — z eS Diese = at Se CST ve eR or - , ~ - s s — a= ee ~ - niet * " - ' — St mee — ~ 2 ns - ‘Ses Te g etait on apne sax itp —— et " a a i - ' allan : = SOE ae eae - = ae * " aa Dae “ . we - _ - — a = —- = * a . oem as ee ~ > a Bes ee ata = aaions Are oe topes Cae a —— oe —~ : ake : = _ yee oF . - ~ a oe ey eee a me mom wa no ere — zz Se : = oe = = — Z SS a = ~ nnn mem SaiebueD ™ - Soe vot whos Se Ne 4 ae ie Sn De ee ee dagasleatioy —- = : - Sep as m = Aa = AannieNaILae aim neeeer oe . ond - = a eae : 5 a, Eee SST 3 he < meen = Su 5 wee = - = ne - _ me * an “ae ashe yoga = — es — Se bi = ia eta oS Ls wes a ER A ee _ = - . : = “ - = See eg i es — ae > = : A = wie in o abs EF ele = aa — ; = i : : ee en ee nig i RB sear iar ore nro - = SS pares ee eer SS 2 : — = = —=—== aaa - Snr Sem ne a -—-- : ae . ha tne ret eat AM 874. HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. The firm of Temple & Ship p was originally the Soutl hern Pump AG a of $25,000. H. F. Temple, of the Chicago firm of J. F. Temple & Sons, in the year above named met J. F. Shipp, of Atlanta, who was the South- Pipe Company, which was established in January, 1874, with a capital ern agent of the Chicago house, and with him formed a partnership, and located in Chattanooga in preference to Atlanta. The business of the new company was the manufacture of the improved porcelain lined farm pump, patent wood pipe for gas and water mains, pump material, tubing, etc. In 1880 they added the manufacture of furniture to their business, and have since conducted this portion of their manufactures under the name of the Chattanooga Furniture Company. The present location of their factory is at the corner of Frank and Boyce Streets. They own 3,000 acres of timber lands in the Sequatchie V alley, mainly covered with hickory, oak and poplar. The capital invested inthe manufacture of pumps and pipes is about $40,000, and in the manufacture of furniture, about $75,000. The Etna Foundry & Machine Works were started in 1874 in a small way by G. W. Wheland, who came here from Ohio. The works are situated between Sidney and Boyce Streets near the South Tredegar Iron Works. cular saw and grist-mill machine ry, general castings, steam engines, and The hecinoce consists in the manufacture and repair of cir- the Todd new improved turbine water wheel. As his business has in- creased Mr. Wheland has added to his building and facilities until at the present time he employs on the average about fifteen men, and turns out about $40,000 worth of work each year. The business to which the South Tredegar Iron Company has fallen heir was commenced in 1860 by 8S. B. Lowe and others, under the name of the Vulean Iron Company, and was conducted by them on a moderate scale until the war put an end to business in Chattanooga. After the cessation of hostilities the company reorganized and continued under the old name until 1873. In 1875 Hazleton & Harrison took up the busi- ness, and were succeeded in 1880 by the Powell Iron & Nail Company, who ran about one year. In 1881 the South Tredegar Iron Company was incorporated with a capital of $200,000. The officers were H. I. Fox, of St. Louis, president; J. M. Duncan. formerly of Ohio, vice-president, and C. EH. Rubedeaux, secretary. In 1880 thirty nail machines were in operation, in 1581 thirty more were added and in 1882, fifteen, mak- Iron nails were made up to June 1, 1884, when the company commenced making steel nails, having on the 19th of the previous April made their first blow of Bessemer steel, the first Bessemer steel made south of the ing seventy-five as the present complement.Pa * = 3 ! yr I HAMILTON COUNTY. S75 Ohio River. Since this time they have made their own steel. In 1883 they commenced the manufacture of railroad spikes, and during the same year built a large cooperage establishment for the manufacture of their own kegs. In their foundry they make iron, brass and steel castings, and they also have a blacksmith shop. They employ on the average about A50 men, the spike plant has a capacity of twenty tons per day, and the nail plant about 160,000 kegs of nails per annum. The Enterprise Machine Works were established by Benjamin Trux- all in 1870, on Market Street between Highth and Ninth. In 1872 Louis Dunmeyer was admitted to partnership, and the firm became Truxall & Dunmeyer, with a capital of 8500. In December, 1885, they moved to their present location, the corner of Montgomery Avenue and Bovee Street, where they manufacture steam engines, shafting, pulleys, and carry on a general repairing business. They employ on the aver- age ten mou and tarn out about $20,000 worth of work per year. ~ The manufacture of brick was begun in Chattanooga, by Abbot & Gol. den, in 1866, and continued by them in a small way until 1870, when (L. BE. & D. P. Montague) purchased the business and at once erected new buildings and added largely to the business. Besides ordinary and fire brick they manufacture sewer pipe and white goods, flue pipe and flue linings, and orind clay to be manufactured into china-ware, and also make farm drain tile, this branch of their business being added in 1885. The capital invested is about $70,000, and the number of men employed in Chattanooga about 125, while in Alabama where they own 9 fire-brick and china-ware clay mine, it is fifteen. When the Fayweather & Ladew Tannery was first established in Chattanooga in 1876, 1t was by the name of J. B. Hoyt & Co., the great leather and belt house of New York City. It was composed of J. B. Hovt. D. B. Fayerweather and H. S. Ladew. In1883 Mr. Hoyt retired from the firm, disposing of his interest to the present proprietors, both of whom are New York gentlemen, the first named never having been 1n Chattanooga, and the latter but once. The business has been conducted ever since its. establishment by David Woodworth, Jr., originally from New York. The property consists of forty acres of land, and fifty-two dwellings for the employes, foreman and superintendent, and the build- ings necessary for the tanning of the hides. and storing of the Oe The tanning is limited to belting and sole eae New York ee hides being used almost exclusively. About 300 men are Tan . year round, and in the barking seasons sometimes aS many as Mae While this tannery with its two main yards and beam-house buildings, its two dry Ronees. seven bark sheds, and other necessary buildings, hasatid dd ae — — a peiapane ae ¥ ae = fraps 3 a 5 = aeRO ae eee os ~S ep 3 “TT SAR Ta _ = St a ~ + Guero ey caer ago ee REIS OES a pe a epee a ee 876 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. not the capacity of some Pennsylvania establishments, yet it probably tans more hides than any similar institution in this country. Neither the amount of capital invested nor the annual amount of business done , could be obtained from the superintendent. Plow-making was begun in Chattanooga, by Newell Sanders, from Indiana, in a small way in 1879. His first factory, a frame building on Fort Street near Montgomery Avenue, was not much larger than a large dry goods box, costing about $100. After working two or three years he admitted to partnership George W. Wheland, the firm then be- coming Newell Sanders & Co. In 1883 it became the Chattanooga Plow Company, a joint stock company with $40,000, taking in C. C. Bloomfield, of Jackson, Mich., and C. D. Mitchell. Mr. Sanders was elected presi- dent of the company, and Mr. Mitchell, secretary. This company purchased the block of ground between Fort and Carter Streets south of Montgomery Avenue, and upon it erected a machine shop 60x150 feet, a foundry 60x120 feet, and a warehouse and office building 60x150 at an agere- gate expense of $10,390, and put in $12,000 worth of machinery.. The capital stock is now $60,000. This company employs about eighty men. one third colored with satisfactory results. The articles manufactured are chilled plows, cane-mills, self-skimming evaporators, portable fur- naces, a Scotch harrow, and a cotton seed and grain crusher, with which it is claimed farmers and planters can with great advantage crush corn into hominy, and also cotton seed into an exceedingly economical fertil- izer. ‘The annual output of this Lactory 1s about $175,000. The Chattanooga Steam Marble & Stone Works (Daly, Smith & Hill) was established by P. C. Daly, in Chattanooga, in 1872, at the corner ot Cherry and Eighth Streets. In 1880, C. E. Smith. having sold his marble business in Cleveland, Tenn.. came to Chattanooga, and pur- chased a one-half interest in Mr. Daly’s business for $600, and soon in addition to the manufacture of monuments and tombstones. furnished dressed stone for buildings. In 1884 their business had so increased that they found it necessary to move from the corner of Market and Kighth Streets to more spacious grounds; so purchased nine lots at the corners of Cowart, Alabama and Williams Streets. and put up two sets of gang iL been conducting a general marble and building stone business. In Sep- tember, 1885, J. T. Hill was admitted into the firm. and the capital increased to $40,000, and the volume of business in 1885 was oo0,000. saws, propelling them by steam, and since the spring of 1885 have since The firm employ about sixty men, and manufacture monuments mainly from Georgia marble, and furniture pieces mainly from Tennessee mar- ble, both varieties being variegated, but the latter much darker in color) x eb EWAMES bile 5 ; i VS es at i i I CEEee ore ~ ¥ * aise nme amet “ere : ee ee Ls Sa gh re Ag Re, Se ye gp, COR a sane re inten is tong mse mage nna Sana perastsg = Se ae ipayenetsrenin is = a pony tage ~ he ae ay : See “ - ———— a eu — Ea oe — ce " ° : a " ms setters — « ve: ae a 7 Bical ea el ii cael e = emt = -— Se 3m m Sega, ne stereos ae Senee <2 : eee = oe —— ti Ween : ner rT Pace > a WE oA Ae oe 7" ‘ ae ee . 2 ai — ures , —— as ccamniliaeies = Feast ET Meat Si RIT ig z RRA or ea : metela ame % hee ee alee s < — ee sheccainditiiie Rees age prs FP AL a et ame ee » = wares re sFm eet eel rien RAIS aR Aa to IP ielitcseensceigemmma aa om 1 en ie a aan porge a aes > sittin ates eas nna ‘i 3 - SAT tag POPE ee mn re Bt. Bites prea iis pee aa a ev or ce Ge as = 3 is oresiney or J S etl www ia * ~* a _ —-- ——— —_— -— rn — em: * ~ 7 $8 000, and the number of men employed about twenty-Hve. The work done consists of the manufacture of castings and a line of mining ears, car wheels and mining tools and general repairing, and amounts to about $35,000 per year. The Alabama Great Southern Shops were established in Chattanooga in 1880. and are located on Montgomery Avenue and Hooke Street. They consist of a machine shop, planing mill, blacksmith shop, pattern shops and round house. The work done here is mainly the repair of locomotives and cars, the only manufacturing yet done consisting of v 55 ea aE serineee domme ‘ 5 “ — e " ney Stee oe ea a Gre i nna RG Te i aims ST aki ae “- cs : . va) | ee voluntarily closed. t t ; The First National Bank was organized October 25, 1865, and opened its doors for business December 26, of that year, with a capital stock of | $200,000. In 1866 the capital and surplus were $210,000, and in 1886 HT | they were $410,000. In 1866 the loans and discounts amounted to Wa $1,223,000, and in 1885, $3,830,000. The first officers of this bank were W. P. Rathburn, president and T. G. Montague, cashier. Upon the | death of Mr. Rathburn, January 10, 1884, Mr. Montague became pres- ii i ident. The other officers at present are H. S. Chamberlain, vice-presi- Ay | dent; H. C. Squire, cashier, and Joseph H. Rathburn, assistant cashier. i i | 7 “oy ‘ < a : - . ° . ill The business of this bank is managed in a cautious, conservative and al safe manner by able business men. Boeri dpee: ee , os = i ; HAMILTON COUNTY. 883 The Third National Bank was organized in September, 1881, with a capital of $125,000. The first directors and officers were William Mor- row, president; J.-H. Warner, vice-president; J. L. McCullom, W. D. VanDyke, J. P. Smartt, S. A. Key, A. M. Johnson, i. Ol @rntitim dj, Wh Hill and D. E. Rees, and T. D. Flippin, cashier. In L882 D» be Rees was elected president; J. P. Smartt, vice-president; and W. E. Baskette, cashier; and in January, 1885, John A. Hart was elected president; D. EB. Rees, vice-president, the cashier remaining the same. ‘The only change since then has been the election of C. R. Gaskill, assistant cashier. In September, 1885, the capital stock was increased to $200,000, and July, 1886, to $950,000, the surplus fund being then $22,500, and the undivided profits 819.250. No interest is paid on deposits subject to check, but four per cent 1s paid on time deposits. The City Savings Bank was started in December, 1885, by R. B. Hillas, D. Satterlee, and G. W. Lhompson, all from Dunlap, Iowa, and C. E. Stivers of Chattanooga, who had been in the employ of the First National Bank of Chattanooga fifteen years. ‘The business was con- ducted as a private partnership until October, 1886, when the bank was incorporated with a subscribed capital of 200.000, with the following officers: G. W. Thompson, president; G. H. Jarnagin, vice-president; and C. B. Stivers, cashier, and with other directors as follows: J. F. Loomis, J. B. Merriam, W. A. Willingham and A. J. Gahagan. Interest is paid on all sums of $5 and upward at the rate of four per cent per annum, the right of requiring thirty days’ notice being reserved, and six per cent interest is paid on certificates of deposit for one year. The Mountain City Fire & Marine Insurance Company was incorpo- rated March 3, 1870, with an authorized capital stock of $500,000. It commenced business June l, 1885. with $100,000 subscribed. Its re- sources, December 31, 1556, were 21()4.255.70, of which there was eredited to the reserve fund on the books of the company $4,729.08, leaving $99,526.62. The losses paid in 1886 amounted to $3,972.68. The reasons for this low loss ratio are that the risks are judiciously scattered and small policies ‘ssued. The officers of the company are J. C. Griffiss, president; J. A. Hart, vice-president, and W. J. Colburn, secretary. The directors in addition to the president and vice-president are D. A. Carpenter, H. 5. Chamberlin, M. H. Clit, W. O. Peeples, J. P. Smartt, H. F. Temple and R. L. Watkins. The Coal. Iron & Manufacturers Association made application for a charter on October 22, 1876, which was granted in the following language: “ Be it known that W. P. Rathburn, J. T. Wilder, S, B. Lowe, M. D. Vanhorn, L. Schofield, L. L. Thomasson, C. E. James, L. Scho-Sees epee smn = ‘ atid Saat, eee in _ : Fp snag A ELE IER AL OEE NC Gay ge ean chiA NY ae Gee Ty MS aw ing a = 7 Sian Ae erat an —— lap ren ae Ms ee ee: aft : { a Way re ee ahi} i ean adi . Z ; q | rf Hp ecg aeeremage: clifign ig Yes! +. a we -- irae eRe Mie aes 7 ee a nes SSS ee mile te | Pet Hae Bae eer iae ad eet} at | ty veh) 4-)ae Me EET al) Tee ea ; Pe Me tS abe yt TA dy tse i Ras be | 1 eT t a} A oe ae oa \b ea Re a ei oe EE i | pt Mui an inal i | Let eee aE ' Bene THe Wa (Aes meng gi] |e ihe eRe Garail baal ; HF Wy } { ane ahi a? Faas | Ni A ; fiaa i ni Ta a itl eve eat Eta | . a at 1 i 4 : Bh A j 7. ben at lt i Th i it \ Mi ee Sete Vit et j ity Hii eet te wird? ‘ A! at Ly if 4 etl ai Py stannic teal | a} ei i if i Ha BURR H | ea) aga al ‘| / a eal ait © bay ) a Mt & THet eal i 1P hay \ et eS | : Whee ivewaie ght ih bee 1 il mi) | ; ey aa Bt aba ie i Mah |i Pee vel | § a Hi 7 pe imi) a lia ER eK EE IE a seen ag ec Sea RT. ee SS 4 HISTCRY OF TENNESSEE. field, Jr., H. F. Temple. W. E. Rockwood, V. A. Gaskell, C. P. Robertson, A. G. Sharp, Edwaid Doud, Lcuis Li. Parham, Tiuerus P: Bright, M. L. Chapman, Tomlinson Fort, E. G. Laton, M. H. Clift, Xen. Wheeler, J. F. James, J. C. Hazleton and H.S. Chamberlain are hereby constituted a body politic and corporate by the name of the Iron, Coal & Manu- facturers’ Association, for the purpose of encouraging, promoting and fos- tering the mineral, manufacturing and commercial interests of the city of Chattanooga and the surrounding country, and with this object in view to establish in Chattanooga an office or bureau for the collection and SYS- tematic arrangement of specimens of iron, coal, and other minerals, with the product of the manufacturer's and mechanic’s art; also specimens of scientific and historic interest; also for the purpose of collecting facts statistics, maps, books,and information of interest and advantage to society, and especially to various interests and occupations represented in said association, one of the objects of this association being to establish an iron, coal and general exchange after the nature of a board of trade -or chamber of commerce, to facilitate and inerease the traffic in iron. coal and other minerals and their products.” The officers provided for «were a president, secretary and treasurer. In order to make the support of the association light for each member the effort was made to secure a large membership. The officers have been as follows: Presidents—W. P. Rathburn, Lovie. A Walder 1877: HS. Chamberlain. [s7se We D: VanDyke, 1879; John O. Griffiss, 1880; S. B. Lowe, 1881; D. E. Rees, 1882: H. Clay Evans, 1883; M. J. O’Brien, 1884: Marcus Grant, 1885: G. G. Connor, 1886. Vice-presidents—H. »S. Chamberlain, 1876 and 1877; W. D. Van Dyke, 1878; John C. Griffiss, 1879; S. B. Lowe, 1880: D. B. Rees, 1881; H. C. Evans, 1882; M. J. O’Brien, 1883; Marcus Grant, 1884; J. L. McCullom, 1885; D. B. Loveman, 1886. Secretaries—M. LL. Chapman, 1876, 1877, 1879 and 1885: T. J. Carlile. 1387S; Gate Connor, 1880 to 1884 inclusive; H. M. Wiltse, 1886. Treasurers—C. P. Robertson, 1876 and 1877: L. P. Bright, 1878 and 1879; R. M. Bar- FON Te os Oe he hE vier, LSS1 to 1886. inclusive. Some of the important work accomplished by this association has been as follows: In 1877 it entertained the Association for the Advancement of Science; in 1878 it entertained the American Association of Mining Kngineers; in 1879, secured a signal station and observer for Chatta- nooga; in 1880. inaugurated a course of lectures. organized 9, system of flood warnings, secured an appropriation for aroad from Chattanooga to the National Cemetery, and the establishment of the United States Dis- trict Court at Chattanooga; in 1882, entertained the charcoal ironee | 3 ae | fee HAMILTON COUNTY. OO Qo Or workers of the United States, raised a committee to secure a customs house. and had the United States take charge of the flood warnings; in 1883. assisted to secure the Methodist University for Chattanooga, and in 1886 raised another committee to secure a custom house. The Board of Trade was organized originally on the 31st of August, 1881. as the ‘“ Merchants’ Union,” at a meeting held in the circuit court room. The cause of the movement resulting in this organization was the discrimination in freight rates practiced against the city of <) Chattanooga by all the converging railroads, and the organization had for one of its objects the termination of this unjust discrimination. P. C. Wilson said that as secretary of the committee on transportation of the Iron, Coal & Manufacturers’ Association, his attention had been ealled to this unjust disctimination, and that he was of opinion that united action on the part of the merchants of the city was the only rem- edy. A committee of citizens was then appointed to organize and suggest permanent officers. All who were willing to become members of the “Merchants Union” signed their names as follows: W. O. Peeples prose lili Thomasson & Son, J. W- Harris, J. B. Merriam, D. J. Pierce. Smartt & Oehmig, Wassman Bros., W. F. Peak, D. B. Loveman caCorw debs byron, J. W. Butler & Co., Thomas W. Muller, M. oJ. O’Brien, Nixon & Wester, P. C. Wilson and R. M. Tankesley, these being all that were present. Officers were elected as follows: M. J. O’Brien, president, Vilham Nixon, first vice-president; W. O. Peeples, second vice-president; aC: Wilson, secretary; D. J. Pierce, treasurer. A committee on transporta- tion was appointed as Pallowse ©. Ps Robertson, Dab Loveman, J. H. Warner. John A. Martin and P. ©. Wilson. A second committee was ap- pointed to draft a constitution and by-laws, and.a third to visit all the mer- chants to secure membership. The committee on transportation was then given power to act and the Union was committed in advance to sustain any contract said committee might make. On September 9, seventy additional members were added to the list. The “ Merchants’ Union” was changed to the Board of Trade otf Chattanooga, January (7. 1s3sen On Hepruany 14. the committee on transportation reported chat although they had not succeeded in making satisfactory arrangements with the railroads, they hoped to do so before long. The committee made quite an encouraging report on April 12, and on October 2, reported that Chattanooga was then more on an equal- ity with other towns as regarded freight than ever before. On March 9, 1885, the board of Trade in obedience to a request trom the Iron, Coal & Manufacturers’ Association, agreed to detray one-half the expense ofee eS Mig eae ee ‘= Sage ia a os eee hence rer nem meerat pa ae oe 7 - SNP ee Mena PS AR Ee ee eget ee me Se peered aka a ine a aa - vetoes re a P = ae » . ane creat = ae a aaa — seen eee Sei al a SPS ee c es - , ze a ns wr Ta m4 “ - a ine . es Wes 3 , aN a e a an : — nooenan ene -- ae aT, rs PI cS ae ae eee ee x “ - ag res wre pana oo hs ars ~ _— ayaa . ~ a 4 - i > P 3 ——-. #, AS i aka. ; 4 = - OTT a pe aT ee eerie = ; - or lk ~ . os ieemenadian iy sae aia a a >, “ ale FS : . = = inca -——- onan SRR * ‘ : - -- ~~ —_~- eae i senainenensiie . ee — Satin ae pore 7 a ae ae ea is an on oe AA Re MER ne - =. a eS na ale sna anette di. oy ROE” pay SCL =e Te % TaN AE wig 2 ett ae palace amet ee as EL il wi aa aepagmyenmtS : “aati na? a a aT gee is epee RR TSS ee ene “ Fa a ay ee i a apna) ay eee mc ay ae - —————— - a aoe Ps af hare ar sioetieeE ———————— TT a ee ee Fee ay I aetna niga en pone one oa? a Lidge: ee tae a A ce i Riese neta ee rd HISTORY OF TENNESSEE, safety, return to the city. The year 1878 had been exceptionally free frat thunder storms, and the physicians believed that while their non- occurrence and the occurrence of yellow fever at the same time might be only a coincidence, yet electric concussions in the atmosphere produce ozone, and ozone is believed to be a peculiarly health-giving substance. The question of high and low water in the Tennessee is also one of peculiar interest to Chattanooga, as in times of high water considerable portions of the city are overflowed. Low water mark was established in 1539, and since then the only times the water has reached low-water mark were four days ineSeptember, 1881, and on September 19, 1883. High water since 1867 has been as follows: March, 1867, 58 feet x of an inch; January, 1879, 38 feet; March, 1880, 38 feet. 4 inches; Feb- ruary, 1551, 22 feet 5 inches; January, 1882, 40 feet 4 inches: anuary, 1583, 38 feet 8 inches: March. 1884. 43 feet: November, 1885, 30.4 feet; April 8, 1886, 51.1 feet. The only other serious epidemic that has visited this city is the small- pox, which raged with exceptional virulence in 1882 and 1883. The first death from this disease occurred in January, 1882, and the last in June, 1853. The epidemic fairly began in May, 1882, when there were fifteen deaths. In December the greatest number of deaths occurred, 103— twenty-six white persons and seventy-seven colored; and the total num- ber of deaths for the eighteen months of the epidemic was 3834, 110 whites and 224 blacks, while the number of deaths from all other causes during the same time was 570; total number of deaths for the eighteen months, 904. This was a most remarkable thing, an epidemic in the latter part of the nineteenth century, in one of the most healthful cities in the South, more fatal than any one of the four great epidemics of the eight- eenth century. raccina- 1873; those who suffered from small-pox were mostly poor people, and the deaths were very largely among the colored people, the population of the city then being composed of 14,000 whites and 7,000 blacks—two whites to one black; while the deaths were almost precisely in the Opposite proportion, two blacks to one white. begun in December, 1882. in which month the number of deaths was 103; in January, 1883, there were But there had been no general systematic tion since Vaccination was only seventy-four, and in February, eighteen, while in March there was but one. Ina few months cases of and deaths from small-pox entirely ceased, either because of vaccination or because the disease had spent its force. in Chattanooga in o1 Two things © are now wanting ‘der that there may be no excuse for a recurrence of this plague: First, an ordinance excluding from the public schools unvyac- cinated children, and second. improved methods of living poorer classes, both white and black. among theHAMILTON COUNTY. 889 The Chattanooga Gazette was founded in 1837 by F. A. Parham as the Hamilton Gazette at Ross’ Landing. The material was floated from Knoxville down the Tennessee River on a flatboat, on which, after arriv- ing at the landing, the first week’s issue was printed. Soon alter arriving at the landing the publisher built a substantial office on Walnut Street, between Fourth and Fifth Streets, which is now used as a dwelling. After Chattanooga was thus named, the paper changed its name to the Chatta- nooga Gazette. The Gazette constantly urged the building of railroads, and supported the principles ot the Whig party from its establishment to its suspension in 1899, though strenuous etforts were made in the days of Know-nothingism to convert the editor to the views of that party. From 1859 the Gazette remained suspended until 1864, when it was re- vived, Joseph Ruohs furnishing the money and James R. Hood and Elbert A. James being the editors. It was the only paper published within eighty miles ot the place, and the army in possession of the city found in its columns great relief from the monotony of camp life. It was finally suspended soon after the close of the war. A number of other papers have been published in Chattanooga, and have been discontinued. Among them were the following: The Daily Republican, the first number of which was issued November 3, 1867; the Daily American Union, the first number being dated March 4, 1866; the Chattanooga Daily Rebel, mention of which has been elsewhere made, and the Chattanooga Daily Herald. the first number of which appeared February 20, 1872. The Herald was a seven-column folio paper; was published by Samuel Bard, and favored the re-election of U. 8S. Grant to the presidency. The Chattanooga Advertiser was published some time by Ramage & Co. The Chattanooga 7imes was founded by Kirby & Gamble in the fall of 1869. the first number appearing De ember 15. In April, 1874, this firm sold the plant for the benefit of creditors, and it was purchased by Patten & Payne, J. C. Payne eonducting the paper from that time to October 1, 1876. T+ then passed into the hands of Cunningham & Cran- dall. a firm which soon dissolved, Crandall retiring, and Cunningham with several different partners. eontinuing its publication until June 30, 1878. when he sold a half interest and leased the other half to Adolph S Ochs. The property was in a very bad condition, and the wee) edition had been suspended, and the yellow tever broke oo within two months of the purchase. By November the expenses of running the paper were over 2800 above receipts, but about this: time the weekly edition was revived, and since then the growth of the paper 1n circula- tion and influence has been steady. From less than 200 in 1878, thePTET ae a ee PEREZ oo manminnaepelae my Jo Ce geneey rer RIG EAC aoe a EE AT ee So ee 1 in. a OT, . a er Qi oe RT ‘ coats os aap Trt Tams TE ct PERSIE cae 3 POSES, to Rig ~ . : exe aici —— aera " iitacmebel : oe fa ee ne ener As a rN a ah ans SRG AN Ge Nigga a A z 2k Ta ee ee sagem cece Pee eA 1 it SEE PTE I RA HT a mcs <7 RSE RTO a IS ha ie SO A lI a SE Ea om LRT AE Me” ele cee a Sf 0) HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. circulation of the Daily Times has grown to 4,000, and of the Weekly Times to 10,000, and the business of the paper has many times doubled since 1880. ‘The entire plant is worth about $50,000. It is owned by a stock company, and since 1878 has been edited by Col. J. E. MacGowan. The total number of employes on the paper and in the publication office is about forty. The Chattanooga Commercial was started in 1872 by a stock company, with George M. Doak as editor. In 1876 the paper was ‘suspended, and in 1877 it was revived by George M. Drake and H. F. Gris- com. Mr. Drake retired in about five months. and the publication of the paper was continued by H. F. Griscom & Co., Mr. Griscom. editor, con- tinuing thus until September, 1884, when the present company was or- On April 19; 1886, the morning daily was changed to an evening daily, the weekly edition con- tinuing to be issued on Sunday. ganized, and a morning daily paper started. The officers of the present company are J. M. Vernon, president and general manager; D. W. Chase, vice- president, and H. F. Griscom, secretary and treasurer. The Methodist Advocate was established in Atlanta. Ga., in 1868; Dr. E. Q. Fuller was appointed editor, and was retained in this position until 1872, when Rev. N. E. Cobleigh, D. D., was elected editor. On Dr. Cobleigh’s death in 1874, Dr. Fuller was appointed to again fill the place, and was elected editor by the general conference in 1876. He was re-elected in 1880, and held the position until 1883, when the paper ceased to be published by the book concern. At this time Rev. T. C. Carter, D. D., purchased the material, moved the enterprise to Chatta- nooga, and issued the first number in that city January 24, 1883. Dr. Carter has since continued its publication. It is recognized by the General Conference, and is the organ of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the South. Its circulation is now 4.000. ciate editor. The Baptist Reflector was founded in 1874, at Morristown, by O. C, Pope, D. D., and was moved to Nashville in 1876, where its publication was continued by W. D. Mayfield & Co. until 1879, when they sold out to J. B. Cheeves, who continued its publication until July, 1881. In January, 1881, J. M. Robertson, D. D., purchased the Baptist Swn, at Rome, Ga., and the Baptist. Beacon, at Knoxville, and concentrated them at Chattanooga. In July, 1881, he bought the Reflector, and removed it to Chattanooga. In November, 1885, the Baptist Publishing Company was chartered with a capital of $10,000, and the paper sold to this com- pany, by whom Dr. Robertson was elected editor. The stock of this company is held in most of the counties of the State, and the paper has J. H. Bowman is the asso-HAMILTON COUNTY. OO co pe a large circulation in Georgia and Alabama, but it is especially large in Tennessee. The Chattanooga Sunday Argus was started November 1, 1885, by G. Allison Holland as proprietor and editor, and ©. S. E. Holland as local editor and assistant business manager. Mr. Holland started this enter- prise with the design of publishing a straight Democratic paper. It is an eight-column folio, circulates in all the adjoining States to the num- ber of about 3,000 weekly, at the annual subscription price of RAD OR A specialty is made of double numbers; about twenty of these being issued each year. The first number of the Tradesman was issued March 38, 1879, by the Tradesman Publishing Company. It is a Southern trade journal, con- tains thirty-six pages, is issued semi-monthly at $2 per annum, and is devoted to the manufacturers, merchants and industrial classes of the South. The company was incorporated with George H. Hazlehurst, president ; H. F. Temple, vice-president, and Adolph S. Ochs, secretary and treasurer. William Yonge was first business manager, and Col. J. E. MacGowan, editor. There are two other papers published in Chattanooga, one devoted to the interests of the laboring man, the other to those of the colored man, the latter being edited by colored men. The Young Men’s Christian Association was chartered November 8, 1876, the charter members being William Morris, H. D. Wyatt, J. L. Morrison, G. M. Sherwood, Paul Kamerer, W. J. Colburn aun imate Thatcher. But little was effected, however, by the association before 1882, in February of which year it was reorganized with about one hun- dred members and officers, as follows: L. M. Elder, president ; FE. Gibson, vice-president; W. B. Strang, first secretary; CG. E. Ensign, record- ing secretary ; Cc. O. Lindsay, treasurer. These same persons have ever since held these offices. The present membership is 325. This associa- tion constantly keeps open a free reading room, and has a free circulating library of about 1,000 volumes. Its most important work is in the evangelical field; its objects are the physical, mental, moral and religious education of the young; it has four rooms in the Adams Block, rent free, which have been furnished with sufficient elegance by the ladies of the city without cost to the association, and its missionary work extends to the criminal and otherwise neglected classes. The Chattanooga Orphans’ Home was established in February, 1878, and incorporated in the following July. It 1s under the auspices of the Women’s Christian Association of Chattanooga, an organization repre- . . ° r a 7 senting all the Protestant denominations of the city. The first meetingnee eons avi ee ae - sa ee eae Si Samat: en pee ae OR LOE = mena om DSH nee ——— a ipa einen She — eae : Pima ~ ) —— - : ae, = ae * Eee nw a = S Pa Fy die A i he Sant we b: sb alia eae EG = ii — = gy TS a ~ ee Saree o anal: < Gag ng. eer me. oS A a apg Ta nee e : ee : = re in are Ne eee art | ae cage i aa a ’ A fe = eee wr = Rat i re a a ee te eer = =o ee ree = eaciaeaoaee a $9? HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. that led to its organization was called by the Home Mission Socie ty of the First Presbyterian Church in October, (eq7 i, the motive leading to it being the desire of the ladies of the city to rescue the unprotected young, especially the girls, from a future life of crime. The home was to be a temporary shelter from which they could be placed permanently in Christian homes, the work having been a most oratifying succes One year after the organization of the home Rey. T. H. Mic@altis donated to it a lot upon which, through the liberal contributions of other citizens. furniture, board and wages of the ten northern ladies having charge of its various departments, lights, fuel, bedding and clothing of all ie ehil- dren have since been supplied. Mrs. Steele chose a board of trustees and deeded to them as a chartered body the property aiter paying for the land, and the buildings which were destr ryed by fire in Nowombon L885. Citizens of Chattanooga paid about $8,000 toward the erection of the new building, and without any solicitation on the part of Mrs. Steele, her triends and acquaintances and the public contribute to the necessities of the institution as they feel inclined, and these voluntary contributions have thus far very largely met its running expenses. Mrs. Steele is e_. > : > a y . 7 ae . : pees a . , 1 from Revere, peed and is conducting this noble charity wholly upon ] e - i: . 7 y = her own responsibility, except as indicated above. The aa e Charities of Chattanooga was organized October 1. 1881. The directors and officers of this association are as follows: H. S. Chamberlain, president; C. - Hoyt, secretary and superintendent; Leonard Boice, treasurer; Rey. J. W. Bachman. chairman of the execu- tive committee; C. P. Robertson, J. C. Griffiss. Tomlinson Hort D ye Chandler, C. S. Peak, R. M. Barton. CG. D. McGuffey, Joseph Wassman, D. Woodworth, Jr., S. P. Breckinridge and D. B. Loveman. | The seeret organizations in Chattanooga are so numerous that a his- tory of each one cannot well be given in accordance with the plan of this work. A list of them, however, is here introduced. Of the A. L. of H., there is the Chickamauga Council. Of the A. O. U. W. Benefit Lodge, No. 6; of F. L., Lookout Camp, No: 83% of the G@ AR. look out Post, No. 2, Mission Ridge Post, No. 45. and Chickamauga Post. No. 22 (colored ) ; IE, (QO), ©), Int. Chattanooga Lodge, No. 45, and Guttenberg Lodge, No. 158; K. of H., Schiller Lodge, No.,158; K. of L.. Lookent Assembly No. 22 ie Eureka Assembly No. 4375 (colored), Central Assembly No. 5589, Phoenix Assembly No. 5726, and McDevitt Assem- bly No. 6883; K. if P., Damon Lodge No. 2, Keystone Lodge No. 35, Endowment Rank Section No. 337, and Uniform Rank, Anchor Division No. 8; Masons—Lookout Commandery No. 14, K. T.; Hamilton Chapter No, 288), In, AN, Ihe Chattanooga Lodge No. 199, F & A. M: Te: upleOTA Ses 2 nt Sees a wire ee Si Pee Faes> >ES eee a enon ERT TTT ne eS span nse FEN ene RRA ree Eee - oe ee ee wa gh ei ange “Say a Netpaeler 2PM Are “einai at on rat oa cheat area sb Ppl gig Sac Mr tg RATS “ " Berg ge Mica aaa tee ie eed eects, eae = PRT ESC —< eee ey a (Lane TTT = e ~ i, — ; Gosek omnge te Tos Laer orp sea Bae ues ee a a Si eee ~ edly th wae at FL aR ag ie a (pa eee ae A cemiennuaess Se RTL AA LTT LET LL, ae Ae ST a 2 eg ndaHAMILTON COUNTY. 893 Lodge No. 430, F. & A. M.; Royal Arcanum, Chattanooga Council No. 137. The S. of IT. are represented by the Chattanooga Division No. 111: U. O. G. C., Chattanooga Commandery No. 77. Colored organiza- tions: P. G. M. Council, G. U. O. F.; Eagle Star Lodge No. Alaeaire Ga U. O. F.; Xenophon Lodge, No. 1995, G. U. O. F.: Household of Ruth, No. 121: Lookout Lodge, No. 10; Phoenix Lodge, No. 14, F. & A. M.; Mt. Moriah Lodge, No. 21, F. & A. M. The Confederate Veterans have N. B. Forest Camp, C. V. No. 3, organized September 1, 1880. Besides the two cemeteries mentioned in the history of the county, there are, in Chattanooga, the City Cemetery, Forest Hills Cemetery, the Hebrew Cemetery and the Catholic Cemetery. The postoffice at Chattanooga was established at Ross’ Landing with John P. Long as postmaster, March 22, 1837. The name was changed to Chattanooga November 14, 1838. John P. Long remained postmaster until October 4, 1845, on which day David J. Carr was appointed. Since Mr. Carr’s term the following have been postmasters: William F. Rags- dale, appointed April 9, 1852; Henry T. Phillips, July Lo, 1853; James B. Hood. March 27, 1861; E. A. James, July 18, 1865; Robert S. Ken- drick, April 5, 1569; Gamuel Bard. December 12, 1872; Robert S. Ken- drick. March 20, 1873; William T. Cate, March 2, 1875; Thomas Taylor, July 3. 1776: John T. Wilder, July 17, 1877; Harry F- Griscom, March 29, 1882, and George W. Martin, July Lo, 1885. The postoffice became presidential February 21, 1506, and the letter-carrier service was estab- lished September lL. Soa: The Chattanooga Orphans’ Home tor white children was established in February. 1878, and incorporated in July following. It is under the i auspices of the Women’s Christian Association of Chattanooga, a body sp) - 1 . ,? a ee opus. Mili Be all the Protestant denominations of the city. The: first cr oo representin ° . se tT hee tho . flaaic meeting that led to its organization was ealled by thé Home Mission Society of the First Presbyterian ‘ hurch in October, 157/. Years ot = Te . A int tha \ » ANOW nar § 47) 7 rOO | labor in relieving the necessities of the pool showed no permanently good results. Little children were growing up from street-begging to lives of crime. and this was especially true ot cirls. The need to rescue them was e'reat and the question was © How can it be done?” Nothing short of complete removal trom parental influence was practicable. The object of the Home was indirectly to provide for temporal wants but the chief end in view was the “ winning of couls.” Hence the Home was to be a temporary shelter and training school trom whieh ehiecnen could be placed permanently in Christian homes. In 1879 Kev. ae MeCalhe donated a valuable lot, and through the liberal contributions of eltizens a build- . » aR Mi ye reyes ; > or a A ANDTe- ing was erected at a cost of $6,500. By additional labor and the appre o 56 nce EE OERTK = sae a FER. I a US TT ao ER Seer Sarr TRE - as - ra fais ae ee oat = - e ee arco eee eT Pe cs lg sialon Sey EAS fF ae a ES eee <— ‘ ee == — = 6 ae 2 - a = eateries - near aae SRERTENL m onyne e ee - ~~ eee GR aay zs a ——— EE re = TaN 3 me oe Ae Ti AME ST RS imemagines ee an ann ete ir ee ace ie eae ant ae 0 " me ae ~ tase Coie ne STOTT eae Sa RR SE a ee RRM eT sg cahiiacsaae rm Ze Ss ERIN at y SSS a re we ESTs aaa a pcan arth a — A a REET tes ane agen een i A ARIS ein tasmanian se — ba . — esas * sae Se TNT Re ME Wr es Lope ae re NE TS ET Sr Sa AER RES aN Sennen oe aaa Sa el Se 9 re a eae > z a = = 2 es ne eae NS os te ke $94 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. ciation of real estate the value of the property is now about $18,000. The number of orphans cared for by sending to homes is about 125, but a number of others have been taken as boarders. ‘The first officers of the institution, electedin February, 1878, were Mrs. KE, D. McCallie, president; Mrs. E. E. Loomis, vice-president; Mrs. 8S. D. McCorkle, secretary, and Miss S. E. Shaffer, treasurer. Mrs. McCallie continued president until February, 1886. At the election in February, 1887, Mrs. E. D, McCallie was again elected president; Mrs. 8. E. Nelson, first vice- president; Mrs. D. Woodworth, second vice-president: Mrs. J. P. Wil- kinson, third vice-president; Mrs. 8. D. McCorkle, secretary, and Mrs. M. M. Wight, treasurer.- The executive committee now consists of Mrs. G. A. Wood, Mrs. A. Hyde, Mrs. Woodburn, Mrs. Crouch, Mrs. G. C. Conner and Mrs. S. C. Dodge. Mrs. C. A. Reed is matron and Mrs. Kemp assistant matron. ‘The total number of beneficiaries of the in- stitution, direct and indirect, is about 200. The Steele Home for colored children was opened April 26,1584. It was designed as a home for needy children where they could be trained to perform the various kinds of housework, receive the rudiments of an English education and have good foundations laid for living upright, honest lives. It is located at the corner of Strait Street and the Hast Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad, and the property, consisting of four lots and the buildings, is worth $15,000. It opened with three chil- dren and has received in all 149, varying in age from infaney to fourteen years. Upon arriving at this last named age the children are sent to the industrial school established by the American Missionary Association. The Home receives $50 per year for feeding each child belonging to the county. Mrs. Steele herself, the founder of the Home, being respon- sible for the building. The origin of the trouble over the city charter was in 1883, when, on account of a strong Republican majority in the city council, colored men were placed upon the police force. ‘This was very distasteful to a por- tion of the Democracy, and they conceived the plan of having a charter passed by the Legislature, which was Democratic, giving the governor power to appoint all the city officers except the mayor and board of alder- men, who were to have no power except to levy taxes and to pay out the funds upon the order of the police commission which was to be appointed by the governor, ‘There were only about thirty Democrats in the secret, all of them ex-rebels. The proposed charter was brought before the Legislature and passed by the Lower House by an almost solid Demo- cratic yote, only three or four voting with the Republicans against it. By this time the people of Chattanooga became thoroughly aroused andHAMILTON COUNTY. 895 sent up to the Legislature an enormous petition against the proposed leg- islation signed by most of the Republicans and liberal Democratic voters of the city. The bill, however, passed the first and second readings in the Senate. By this time, Col. Case, senator from Hamilton County. had organized a strong working force against the bill, and went before the Senate committee before whom, as attorneys for the bill, were Snod- n Y ’ . ) > grass and T. M. McConnell. The burden of the argument in favor of bill was that the Republican party of Chattanooga was so strong that the Democrats could have no voice in the government of the city, and that the Republicans put negroes on the police force. Snodgrass, during the course of his speech in fayor of the bill, said in substance: ‘‘If any of you gentlemen will come over to Chattanooga and get on a little ben- der, we will furnish a nigger to arrest you, a nigger to lock you up and a nigger to take care of you after you get into jail. Pass this bill and it will end the occupation of that gentleman (pointing to Case) and he and all of his northern Yankee friends in Chattanooga will leave the State.” Influenced by such arguments as this the Senate committee, composed of thirteen Democrats and two Republicans reported the bill on its third reading. It came up on Thursday before the final adjournment of the Legislature. In the meantime Col. Case had prepared a table of statis- tics showing the wholesome management of the city’s affairs by the Republicans, and also showed that several times when the Republican conventions had nominated incompetent men for important offices they had themselves as a party, elected a Democrat in preference because of his superior qualifications and higher standing. He also showed that there was no mismanagement of the city’s affairs, that the money had all been judiciously and economically expended, and that under Republican administrations; Chattanooga had the best system of schools in the South- ern States. These figures and facts were all placed in the hands of Senator Patterson of Savannah, Tenn., who, in his argument against the bill, said that the Democratic party should not be the only party in the world to oppose local self government; that this bill contemplated the placing of the government of Chattanooga in the hands of the governor of the State. and that the Democratic party was belying its history in attempting to pass any such enactment. Senator Patterson held the floor two hours, when adjournment for dinner was had. After convening again he took the floor and was so melting away the support of the measure that the Democrats favoring it became alarmed, and did not dare to bring it to a vote, and about 3 P. M. moved to postpone further consideration of the bill until the next Tuesday. During the postponement the measure was beaten in the Senate. AsaSamia RTOS eT ON ts eli ara: a Ee era 896 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. result, the managers of the affair in Chattanooga, in concert with a few Republicans, fixed up a compromise measure by which the government was to remain unchanged except that the governor should appoint a police commission. to consist of three men not more than two of whom should be of the same party, and that this commission should have the appointment and control of the entire police force of the city. The mayor was to hold his office for two years instead of one, and the number of aldermen was reduced from ten to six, one from each ward and one at large. This act also provided that all voters, as a precedent to voting, should register at least ten days before the election. and pay his poll tax at the time of registration. The operation of the act was such that the Republicans gained every alderman and the mayor. The registration operated in such way as to create a corruption fund, candidates for office having, in many cases, to pay the poll tax for voters. Although this was a compromise measure, those most active in its procurement were not satisfied to abide by it, but went back to the Legislature asking that body to pass a measure eliminating the board of mayor and aldermen from any participation in the covernment of the city except to levy taxes and pay them out upon the order of the board of public works, a board of school commissioners and a board of police commissioners, all to be ap- pointed by the governor of the State, and made it obligatory upon the mayor and board of alderman to levy the tax upon estimates furnished by these several boards. This act passed the Lower House ot the Legis- lature, and two readings in the Senate, and was recommended for its third and final passage by the committee on corporations. Col. Case in the discussion of the question made a very vigorous fight against the measure on the ground of its unconstitutionality in depriving the tax- levying power of the discretion as to what tax should be levied and expended, and sueceeded in converting five or six Democratic senators to his views and they refused to vote for the measure, unless an amendment were adopted to the effect that the act, if passed into a law, should not take effect until after having been first submitted to a vote of the people of the city of Chattanooga, and adopted by a majority of the voters cast- ine their votes at such election, and that if a majority of the voters should be found opposed to the law going into operation, it should re- main as if it had not been passed. In this condition the bill was passed by the Senate, and the House concurred in the amendment, but the parties who were pressing the measure, have never yet dared to wa eee kh y > j ° ; a « submit 1% to a vote of the people, thus tacitly admitting that in their opinion the people of Chattanooga, if given a chance to do so, would = certainly vote it down.HAMILTON COUNTY. $97 The people of East Tennessee were highly gratified by the appoint- ment of the Hon.-D. M. Key to the postoffice portfolio in the cabinet of President Hayes. A meeting of the citizens of Chattanooga was held March 17, 1877, to give expression to their views and sentiments. W. A. Hoskins was president of the meeting. In the fall following, President Hayes, having accepted an invitation to visit Chattanooga, arrived in that city September 20. The party consisted of the Presi- dent, Mrs. Hayes, and their two sons, Burchard and Webb, Postmaster- General Key, William M. Evarts, and others. An address of welcome was delivered by Col. J. B. Cooke, a prominent ex-Confederate officer. Wade Hampton then made an address, as also did Gen. Key. An address was delivered tor the colored people by Rev. G. P. Milton, and for the workingmen by R. Y. Brennan. Three years later another visitor, equally distinguished with Presi- dent Hayes, but in different ways, arrived upon invitation in Chatta- nooga—Thomas Hughes trom Rugby. On the 15th of September, 1880, Mr. Hughes reached Chattanooga, on the 16th visited Lookout Moun- tain. and in the evening held a reception at the Stanton House. In the course of his reponse to the toast: “Our Guest, Author, Statesman, Philanthropist, Chattanooga welcomes him to the inner sanctuary of her admiration and popularity,” he said: “From the top of Lookout Mountain L admired the superb richness of the country, but there is a higher and more human side to the sights afforded a stranger in your town. I refer to that most beautiful ceme- tery in which are oathered together those who fell in the war, now twenty years ago. To all the advantages of your city is added the most inspiring one that you are here in the center of the greatest events of our day. One feels that the greatest crisis that the world has yet gone through took place on these hills. The lines m ~ Childe Harold” apply more fully to these fields than to Waterloo, or any other battle-field cele- brated among the nations. The crisis at Chattanooga was more impor- tant to the human race than the crisis at Marathon or Tours. The only sentiment that will find utterance in the hearts of all true Americans is expressed in the words: ‘Union and freedom now and forever.’ Ny Coulterville is situated on the Cincinnati Southern Railway, thirty- three miles from Chattanooga. At the time this railway was constructed there was here but one house, that of John J. Coulter, besides the were erected in 1802. The church was built by 1¢ country. Mr. Coul- church, both of which subscription by the people living in the surround ter gave the railroad company two and one-fourth acres of land, and sold them about three and two-thirds acres more upon which to erect the { } ;erp iT a a Seen a Ee a a eae : : > ae - a aanerel Eri ab RTPOa on — a. Rae a es oa = A a ea RAS SS PR a TS ae a ae esteem oe ch Bi smn om 898 HISTORY OF TENNESSEE. depot, and the church authorities also sold the railway company the church property, which added to the other makes about six acres owned here by the company. Sale Creek Lodge, No. 280, A. F. & A. M., then united with the church and erected a building 50x40 feet in size, and two stories high to be used both for religious and educational purposes, standing about 300 yards above the depot, and costing about $1,000, Four stores have been kept in this village: the first by W. L. Pahmyer, in 1877, the second by Spivey & Martin, the third by D. W. & Wea Wilson, and the fourth by J. J. Kelley. two stores, kept respectively by J. M. Martin and John R. Hickman, At the present time there are who has been postmaster since June 3, 1879, when the postoffice was established. Sale Creek is on the Cincinnati Southern Railway. The Welsh Company came here in 1867, and leased the coal mine of Lusk, Pearl & Co.; commenced mining coal and carried the coal on a tram railroad to Sale Creek, flatboats until 1875, when work was suspended and a railway graded a distance of one and a half miles, where it was loaded into from the mines to connect with the Cincinnati Southern Railway. When The first store was started here in 1868 by Peter Bolton, who sold out in 1875 to this railway was built the place had about 300 inhabitants. the Welsh Company. 1 = (oN 5 j ] - ° | ) T 7 land in Bradley County, at Jasper in Marion County, and at New Bethel . - 1 1 % i T Si ‘ : . 7 * ye e in Bledsoe County. He was taken sick while preaching in the Presbyte- rian Chureh at Clevelandduring the session of the synod, was taken home t \\ and died shortly afterward. He was a charter member of Washington - Masonic Lodge and was very active in the furtherance of every interest, pertaining to the prosperity of the lodge. The mother was born in Bledsoe County and died in May, 1853, in Cook County, Tex. Dr. Bell received his literary education principally at Sequatchie College in Bledsoe County, where he graduated in the mathematical and English course of study, He is also a graduate of the medical department of the University of Nashville and the Vanderbilt University. At each of these institutions of learning he acquitted himself in a highly ereditable manner, taking rank with the best or the students in attendance. Aftez attending his first course of lectures he logat <1 at Dayton, Tenn., where - 5 ' . ry L 4 | ey — r 1 7 ' 3 he remained but a short time. He was at UCoultery ille two years and then moved to Soddy in June, 1555, an l has been quite successtul as a practi- tioner. Dr. Bell is a young man, but his prospects seem very bright for the future. He married EB. L. Abel, of Dayton, Tenn., daughter of Perry and Mary Abel. ‘The Doctor is a descendant of purely Irish ancestry. Mrs. Bell is a member of the Methodist Eniscopal Church South, and of 4 i | j ( Dutch descent. The Doctor is a Democrat and a member of the Cumber- land Presbyterian ¢ Dr. H. Berlin is the son of H. and CG. H. (Peters) Berlin, both } 1 1 HuUuren . oe ae fe CIN ae Pt ernie natives of Mechlinburg, Germany, where they now live. ‘The father was a farmer and manufacturer of fishing tackle. Ot their family of two children our subject was the youngest. He was born May 8, 1851, also in Mechlinbure, Germany, and secured his education, both literary and professional, in his native country. After practicing medicine there tor two vears he came to the United States ‘n 1879. and loeated in Chatta- . ee “~~ rence A ne L- Q cya?) »y"F yd tee at T A ( | 2] nooga. He was for a time engaged 1n the general practice of medicine, but of late vears has devoted his entire energy to surgery and female 1. familiarize’ himself more with the ideas and prac- diseases, wishing to tice of the profession in this department he became a student of the Uni- % i In 1875 he married Miss Mary Von Podiwils, of 57 versity of Tennessee. oe oaEe eam ai ST ae wae - . ar : SaaS, meron = - Sa : - ws aN me £ : i is ai tae arse ee coin fr ne amma Fae — c os = 25 z ‘ antl = aia < . weit? . this ame on ee a = z a facilites ~ cme ome a pee ini ENS a tt a a = — , . PS PTE aes ee a 4 ; “ im a year eee cathy aR esa tS STE LS ee re Pic 5 x s Soi rs - Sa eee J : ee ee se 5 Bethe. ea . ; 3 - oe gots ~ een < 4 spe oh gaa is Bee eer : - - - 7 ga ie wale La nes . _ : te : ne - 2 . _ ers me a = . : ond Sere : > = co -— a ope oe Spa ana mete ens eae Rapp nee eee a ne clara he es ee a aa - - - eian " al omnes a SE rae gr a oe Ras ers ea ee (ims oma tie tn, anes ore = eat a = ‘ a > = : min rere . sna s Sy eR oT Es SLE z Sh ste 2 ares oni oe ge oe es ree ~ mace reie Se narnia ite ria a ea ia see ea tm Ce San EE PN aaa et a a an wae eee gl Bier Been Sis ae ae Ee RE aR = a eR telly. aa SG Cc DE i ei TD 910 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. Germany, by whom he has two children: Charlotte and Henry. The Doctor is a correspondent for several medical journals on subjects per- taining to the profession and science. He is a member of both State and county medical societies, being vice-president of the latter. He is 9 Mason and a member of the K. of P. Mrs. Dr. Berlin is a member of the Episcopal Church. Charles W. Biese, secretary and treasurer of the Lookout Ice and Cold Storage Company, of Chattanooga, was born in Holstein, Germany, November 8. 1835; came to the United States in 1860 and located at Chicago, where, in 1861, he enlisted in the Federal Army, sery- ing through grades of private, sergeant, lieutenant and captain in the Highty-second Illinois Regiment until 1865. He then opened one of the first coal mines in this locality which he operated three years. He was then connected with Cherokee Mining & Manutfac- turing Company, and later was connected with the Georgia Coal Com- pany. In 1869 he assisted in building bridges and trestles on the Great Southern Railroad, Alabama. Later he engaged in the same busi- ness with the Alabama Grand Trunk Railroad, with office at Mobile, Ala. and was engaged in the commission business for two years. In1875 he returned to this place and engaged in the agricultural implement bus- iness which he lately sold to his son, Robert and a Mr. Dickinson. In 1883 Mr. Biese had a company formed to engage in the manufacture of artificial ice, but owing to competition it proved a failure. In 1884 he again formed a company of which the present company is the outcome and of which he is secretary. In 1864 he married Narcissa H. MeDon- ald, of Dade County, Ga., who died in 1873, leaving four children, all of whom are living. In 1875 he married his present wife, Miss Hliza A. ~ Pryor, of Jasper, Tenn., who has presented him with two sons, only one living. Mr. Biese is a Republican, a Knight of Labor, a Mason, and a member of the G. A. R., was Post Commander of Lookout Post, No. 2, during 1886. He is also a member of the K. of P., K. of H., and of the Methodist Episcopal Church South, of which he is a steward. U. D. Billmeyer, D. D.8., whose birth occurred March 14, 1853, is a son of Joseph and Margaret (Carnahan) Billmeyer, who were born, reared and married in Pennsylvania. After living in that State for some time they then moved to Michigan about 1852. In early life the father was a contractor and builder and later a farmer and fruit grower. Both are living in Michigan at the present time. Of their family of seven chil- dren our subject is the eldest. He graduated in the Michigan State Nor- mal School in 1876, and, after teaching a year, entered the dental depart- ment of Michigan University, completing the course in 1879. The fol-HAMILTON COUNTY. 911 lowing year he accepted the position of demonstrator of operative dentis- try in the same institution, which position he held in a highly creditable manner four years. Onaccount of failing health he was obliged to resign his position in the middle of asession. In 1884 he came to Ghattanoosa, and. withoutthe assistance of relatives or friends, succeeded in building up an excellent practice. In 1882 Miss Lida Wallace, a native of Michigan, became his wife. They are both members of the Methodist Church. He is a member of the East Tennessee Dental Association, is a Royal Arch Mason and president of the Union Wood Dish Co. Samuel Blair, of Chattanooga, was born in Harrison County, Ky., December 2, 1816, where he was reared and educated. In 1840 he went to Cincinnati, Ohio, and engaged in the ice business, and is stilla mem- ber of the Cincinnati Ice Company. He came to Chattanooga in 1883, and a year later organized the Lookout [ce Company of which he has been principal stockholder and president. In December, 1856, the company began the erection of cold storage warehouses, and have changed the name to Lookout Ice and Cold Storage Company, with increased capital. In April, 1843, he was united in marriage to Miss Mary A. Lafferty, of Cin- einnati, Ohio. The fruitsof this union were five living children—three sons and two daughters. Mr. Blair isa member of the Methodist Episcopal Church. a member of the I. O. O. F., also of the encampment of the L. O. O. F. andis a Democrat in politics. He isan honest and well respected citizen. He has lately organized a stock company of $50,000 and is now boring for natural gas and oil in Hamilton County, Tenn. near Luck Creek. Dr. M. Block, wholesale druggist, is a native of France, born in 1832. He received his literary education in Metz, Lorraine. In 1857 he immi- grated to the United States, spending his first two years in New York as elerk in a wholesale notion house. In 1859 he went to Chicago, where he taught French, while attending two courses of lectures at the Chicago Medical College, where he graduated in 1863, and at once entered the United States Army as acting assistant surgeon. In 1866 he was mus- tered out of the service as assistant surgeon, located in Chattanooga, engaged in the practice of his profession, in which he met with much suc- cess. Excessive labor broke down his health, which forced him to give up the practice. In 1566 he embarked in the drug business in copartner- ship with his brother-in-law, Mr. Prosper Lazard, under the firm name of M. Block & Go. The combined capital of the partners being $22,500. In 1872 Dr. Block commenced traveling in north Alabama and Georgia in the interest of his house, laying the foundation of the wholesale drug business, in which the firm has met with such remarkably good success5 Pare Sos 4 see ipa meen Se Ae ROE NO RTL TE A a OTE eye eT - ; ; Abe, } Cy ty i : i ie eL ae Ie Ba iF iy ei fy ? aa ) ¥ Pe ve ni t | i! i Rao ea RS Le t ie : te i i bi Hit 7 i E | vin i \ Ef " et { li ai i ; Li } 1 i '{ tian hage Hh Hae, i Bite i Meta een | { Hi | Aa EIS 11 a, a ' a Pe 8. eh Hi ue a ei, ie ben) att ee ty aa rt aa BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. 912 since. The firm keeps now two traveling salesmen on the road, has a regular laboratory in charge of a competent chemist, and owns several valuable propriatory articles, among others the well known Bee Hive Cough Syrup, a valuable expe ctorant that meets with large sales. In April. 1885. Mr. Lazard, owing to ill health, withdrew actively from the Jf } . : — he a . * = . business. The firm name of M. Block & Co. is still retained, but will soon be changed (about July 1, 1887,) in that ofthe M. Block Drug Com- pany, under a recent charter obtained from the State of T’ennessee. The new company will remove into larger quarters, and with an increase of oc) capital will ¢ yrrespondingly increase its operations. Dr. Block married in 1865, and is the happy father of two daughters and two sons, one of = the latter, Master Leo Block, a promising lad of seventeen, being order- elerk at his father’s store. The remarkable success of the firm is mainly due to the principle of strict honesty and rule of promptness adopted from the start. The Doctor enjoys a well merited social and professional reputation, has at one time been president of the board of education. He is now president of the Chattanooga Druggist Association, and vice- president of the East Tennessee Pharmacy Association. rT Pater Bolt Hai ATi cen RT Acoli) DOrnnES Ori nvon LON. eter bolton, mechanic and Magistrate. was Dorn LHebvruary al, miles north of where he now 1824, in Rhea County, Tenn., about five lives. He is the eldest of nine children, born to the union of Robert and Annie (Holt) Bolton, and he and two brothers are the only surviving ‘Inian, who came members ot the [The father was a native Vir to Tennessee at a very early day, and settled in Rhea County in -1816. lied in 1869. Mrs. Bolton was bornin Williamson County, Tenn., and died in 1870. Her father was a soldier in the war of 181%. Mr. Peter Bolton, grandfather of our subject, came to Granger County, Tenn., some time before the Indians were moved out of East l’ennessee, and was l *) } Vv TO 7 y | « as \ re 1 ‘oy? ite an extensive tobacco raiser. Our subject came to Hamilton County made his home with his uncle. and was educated in the Hamilton County. He worked at the black- smith’s trade until twenty-five years of age, after which he worked at the bout 13839, ; ibseription schools of carpenter’s trade, which he had learned in connection with the blacksmith’s trade. He was postmaster at Sale Creek twelve years, but resigned the office after his election as representative from Hamilton County. He was elected justice of the peace of the Eleventh District in 1864, and has been elected each successive election since that time. During the years 1868 and 1869 he was tax collector for his district and served as deputy sheriff at the same time. were with the stars and stripes. Previous to the war, in 1852, he married During the late war his warmest sympathies Miss Selena L. Merriman, of Bledsoe County, Tenn., daughter of BryantHAMILTON COUNTY. 913 and Martha (Ferguson) Merriman, who came trom Wilkes County, N. C.. to Bledsoe County, Tenn., in 1834. Mr. and Mrs. Bolton are members of the Missionary Baptist Church. of which Mr. Bolton is now Deacon, In politics Mr. Bolton has been a life long Republican, casting his first presidential vote for Abraham Lincoln. - Samuel Born, superintendent of Forest Hill Cemetery, was born in 1835. in Switzerland, where he grew up and married Miss Fannie Kelly- house, by whom he had two sons. His wife died in the old country, aa he then married Elizabeth Icely, by whom he had two daughters. In 1870 he came to this country, and three years later his wife also came over. she died of cholera ilies He afterward married Minerva Carden who bore him one son. After her death he married Mrs. P. M. Bennett who had one daughter by a previous marriage. . Mr. Born worked at gardening until 1551 when he took charge of the cemetery. He owns eighty-five a eres of land four miles trom Chattanooga for whieh he has been offered $16,000. Heisag od citizen and well respected. He and his wife are members of the Methodist Episcopal Church. William M. Brundage, farmer, is a native of New York, born Novem- ber 11: 1331, and the son of Jonathan W. Brundage and Permelia (Mills) Brundage, both natives of Orange County, N. Y., and both of German descent. The tather was one of the most successful physicians of Susquehanna County, Penn.: he died in 1864, at the age of sixty-five, and mother in 1861, at the age ot sixty-one. Our subject received a fair education in the common schools of Pennsylvania. He began life a poor man after the late war, but now owns a 9\ od farm on Mission Ridge, oe miles from Chattanooga. The farm is well cultivated, is very fertile and productive, is estimated to be very valuable, as compared with the valuation of land sold near him. In 1858, Mr. eonenee married Miss Sarah J. Bennett, a native of Pennsylvania, born May 224, 1841, and the daughter of L. G. and Maria J. Bennett. To our subject and wite were born two daughters: Georgie V. and Nora E. Previous to the war Mr. Brundage was a Whig in politics but since that event has voted with the Republican party. He is an honest, industrious man and is respe ected by all. Mrs. Brundage is a me smber of the Methodist Episcopal Church. James D. Buttolph, is a native of Liberty County, Ga., born October 94. 1858; son of David L. and Laura | Maxwell ) Buttolph, né atives respectively ot New York and Georgia. Our sub ject was reared and educated in Georgia, but remove .d to Marietta of the same State in 1868. In 1873 he entered the employ of his present partner, Mr. Thomas H. Cheek, being head miller tor five years of the Kennesaw mills: He traveled one season, 1885. for Milnan Kerr Dust Collector Co. He came= sz PLB ae a ee - pom 2 aS eee os 2 er zs LEA ies TS elie = * io - oa os — Eee ee ES Re Sosa eee a ex a = Sse eee Seer me : ae hese gs sear gener ae OIE LIT AD SE Te poe < Seep serrate et — pala aba Te a ee Ree és pene so ere i RENEE ati cr anatase Se ae Aen mee, gee Me ie * a gj? Mae pwc neS 7 . ae eee GIS: = moe , Bie ents eat =. ee ia tee ate ES 8m A eee md ae ql NS Reg er ons eons nie n se i eae i = ——. ere ee ee Te — -- “ — eee = ke ee Se ea “fas —— ae cies - a Sacto w eee ee e a a TS pe was aise oe me ge ematere oi i Spatidige C ma, Kahe Lamar peiaginn ae ese ree. nije ea etn ~ - oa ~ "6 pa. =, = Me eC salina eI so ea cael eer ot hi Sak ~ Fa a tess AT arn ees ae eS _ Tinian oregon Reet aero Pept pncawnaii seasons Ma Se TA OL oe —_ 914 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. to Chattanooga in January, 1886, and in May entered the firm of Kakin Cheek & Co. Tn April, 1880, he married Miss Bessie Elliott, of South Carolina, niece of Bishop Elhott, of Georgia; two sons blessed this union, Mr. Buttolph is a Democrat in politics and a member of the Presbyterian Church. William A. Campbell, of the firm of Ristine, Campbell & Co., was born in Meigs County, Tenn., February 3, 18438, and is the son of Andrew and Sarah (Shiflett) Campbell, natives, respectively, of North Carolina and Virginia. Our subject was reared to manhood in his native county, and in 1862 enlisted in the Federal Army, Company G, Third Regiment, Tennessee Cavalry, and served through the grades of private, lieutenant and captain of his company until the close of the war, atter which he engaged in merchandising in his native county until 1871, when he went to Charleston, T'enn., and followed the same pursuit, in con- nection with the grain business, until 1884. He then wént to Sweetwater, Tenn., and organized the Bank of Sweetwater, of which he was cashier until November, 1886. He then came to Chattanooga, and became con- nected with the present business, although still connected with the bank and other enterprises at Sweetwater, Tenn. April 20, 1869, he married Miss Mary J. Henninger, of Pikeville, Tenn., who bore him four children. Mr. Campbell is a Democrat, a Royal Arch Mason, council degree, a mem- ber of the American Legion of Honor, and also a member of the Cumber- John A. Campbell, a brother of William A. Campbell, also a member of the firm of Ristine. Campbell & Co., of Chattanooga, was born in Meigs County, Tenn., August 3, 1848, and in this county was reared and educated. land Presbyterian Church. In 1871 he engaged in merchan- dising with his brother, William A., in his native county, and also engaged in business in Loudon County, Tenn. In September, 1885, he became a member of the firm of Ristine. Campbell & Co., and has continued as such up to the present. Heremoved to Chattanaoga in. April, 1886. December 10, 1875, he married Miss Mollie B. Boggess, of Meigs County and to them were born three children. Mr. Campbell is a Democrat and a Royal Arch mason. John T. Cahill, proprietor of Cahill’s Architectural Brass and Iron Works, was born in Lynchburg, Va., in 1855, and is the son of William and Margaret (Maher ) Cahill, natives of Ireland. Our subject removed to Chattanooga with his parents before the war, and here he was reared, learning the molders trade. In 1875 he established his present busi- ness ona capital of $3,000, but has increased the business from time to time. In 1880 he erected his present foundry on thecorner of Boyce and Hook Streets. The dimensions of this immense structure is 200HAMILTON COUNTY. 915 x218 feet. They make a speciality of architectural work (building cast- ings) and also do a general foundry work, handling and manufacturing grates and mantels. They employ eighty men on an average, and the business sales amount to $100,000 per annum. Mr. Cahill is a stock- holder and director of the Dowling Furnace Company. In 1881 he married Miss Ellen Burchell; of Knoxville, Tenn. He 1s independent in politics, and he and his family are members ot the Catholic Church. M. Cary, manufacturer of carriages and spring wagons, 812 Cherry Street. and 813 Georgia Avenue, was born May al, 1844, in Bucyrus, Ohio. He is the second of four children born to Aaron and Nancy (Myers) Cary. Aaron Cary was born in 1814, in Bucyrus, Ohio, and is of Seoteh descent. His ancestors came to America at the time the Pil- grims landed at Plymouth Rock, an l ssettler at Bucyrus, Ohio, having built the first house at that place. ‘The iis father, Lewis Cary, was the first mother of our subject was born in 1521, in Carlisle, Penn. Her great- grandfather came ‘»om Holland about the time the Hollanders settled on the Hudson River. Mr. Cary was reared in the Quaker Church, but at present he is a member of the Second Presbyterian Church. His son, Dr. Cary, was appointed medical missionary to: Siam, by the board of missions of the Presbyterian Church. M. Cary, the subject of this sketch. received his education 1n the graded schools of Defiance, Ohio. At the age of eighteen he went to Monroeville, Ind., and bought staves for his brother. The following year he accepted a position as general agent for Reiley & Robertson, of Allegheny City, Penn., and Cleveland, dealers in oil barrel cooperage. He had the supervision of thirteen points throughout Indiana and Ohio. ‘The firm failing in 1869 threw Mr. Cary out of employment bat he secured a position as drummer from Carnahan, Hannah & Co., wholesale dealers in boots and shoes, at Fort Wayne. Ind., where he remained two years. He then took charge of a general store at Maples, Ind., which he had previously owned. The style of the firm being M. Cary & Co. He was also engaged at the ame time in the stave business and 1n manufacturing patent barrel hoops. At the end of six years he moved to Fort Wayne, Ind., and traveled one year tor Burgert & Hart, of Toledo, Ohio, wholesale boot and shoe dealers. In 155V he purchased and ran the Mayer House, at Fort Wayne, Ind., a short time. and then began settling up his busi- ness preparatory to coming South. In the fall of 1881 he moved to Chattanooga, and followed various occupations until the fall of 1886, when M. F. Drake Carriage Manufactory, and he purchased an interest of the business. He married Miss Nancy afterward purchased the whole Simpson in the winter of 1867 and the fruits of this union were five il ange A ’ ie re fo- | Ht i id +z lg =e aie EEi as PA Re. ss il a, ] a : aS — -- + : fm + sian oea “0 omarion RN ETT ns ‘ ‘ S ee shia Fg we —— 7 ‘ gba Nha Niemen . a 5 ; ~ a SE oo — ~ . . = parent aor tae ~ oe a =e ue oe iene meee en. - Ziaty a rt an Kagan oe Sahn Sa a ese eee " os a oe : < SS eit " ails ” ; ~: Sh SN EE TT LAIR T anh pI ia ee ae Sere eas ad eae Se ot — e age ~~ a eT athe i ee Ws aed o TT heya ery eee predate nae = SS eel j ae ‘ 2% ih ( iH +t i al : t ei tet Oe ePREb ees | fi r eel eek, MY de ‘ ie vay i i | qi E ie at ; meee aha f @& ’ i baa b * $5 bu | bee ‘ i i b gat ie | tat 4 ; il ; i le f f i" y Lh be a Hi | SR cee 0s) cae tae " Tie ack Hb F ea i; 1) i Y a i | nt vet) if mae aa ie i i pertitiet) : Fy iu | i | . i Paes : : eerie cape eo t Bt ai ei + ite M f Py Bel id Wea ORM ip vi HHH ai he 1 tanh} 15a} f i] i | j Lat ee L ‘ sy 1B tte 4 We . ee ea i ive eae! i Lt re ee ae a Re ae if fi ry ie i ; 4 i ti i tae" i ‘ Fie a peeks ihe late es eae ts Ba at ‘ be ty i : i i { Brea 00104 eae a Pepe ey it t} aT aT a t | : Ly faa} ial i en ritare| Pant IF i! , el ile Vit fears raat bagi 1 a tiERy tls ie biipest ae Lee 4 ei if ia) 1} 4) eae ER ve ‘ a ‘ta ie hi Hl hi ii iP 1| i | \ i tal ' Per NTS Os TES on = eee oD —_ = st es ie = = RTE RFE ee ERED In SITS ALES AR niet Bil sees eer Son =a EOS 916 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. children: Alberta (deceased), Arthur M., Estella E., Winifred Alice and Hugh Aaron. Mr. and Mrs. Cary are members of the Mission Ridge Presbyterian Church in which Mr. Cary is an elder. He is a Republican in politics and an excellent citizen. D. T. Carpenter, farmer and molder in the Ninth District, was born July 9, 1827, in Grafton County, N. H. When twenty-six years of age he went to Cleveland, Ohio, where he remained one year, and then went back to New Hampshire and married Miss Miranda Parkhurst, of Andover, Vt., daughter of John and Hannah (Johnson) Parkhurst. Mrs. Carpenter was born in Vermont in 1831, and by her marriage became the mother of nine children, viz.: Hlla (Mrs. W. S. French), Clarence A., Clara E., Flora B., George EH. (deceased), Grace L., Jettie A. and George E. Mrs. Carpenter is a member of the Presbyterian Church. D. T. Carpenter is a son of Asa and Anna (Turner) Carpenter. The: father was born in New Hampshire and died in 1863. The mother was also a native of New Hampshire and died in 1843. They were both of English descent. The father was a descendant of one of three brothers who came to Connecticut from England about the time of the Revolution- ary war. He was a captain of State militia for many years, and he and his wife were zealous Christain workers in the Congregational Church. Aiter marriage our subject moved to Chicago, where he worked at mold- ing in a foundry for three years. In 1856 he moved to Cleveland, Ohio, where he was foreman in a foundry for the next sixteen years, after which he moved to Columbus, Ohio. He came to Chattanooga in 1873 to look for a suitable place to locate, and in 1874, moved his family down, settling in Chattanooga, where he secured an appointment as foreman in a foundry, in which capacity he continued until 1883. Here he with others organized what is known as the “ Phoenix Foundry Co., ” of which Mr. Carpenter is president and his son, C. A. Carpenter, and Mr. French are managers. They have enjoyed excellent success, con- tinuing to run during the entire time of the stagnation in business of the past three or four years. Mr. Carpenter began life in very limited cir- cumstances, but by economy and judicious management 1s now in a very comtiortable condition. Besides the interest’ he owns in the Phoenix Foundry he has a fine farm of 100 acres. nicely located on Mission Ridge near Kast Lake Station, on the Belt railroad. He enlisted in Com- pany H, One Hundred and Fiftieth Ohio National Guards in 1864, and served as one of the 100 days’ men. He was fifth sergeant of his com- pany, and at the end of the 100 days was brought home sick. Mr. Car- penter’s grandfather, Jesse Carpenter, was a soldier in that mighty strug- gle for independence. :« , hss HAMILTON COUNTY. O17 Hon. Halbert B. Case, attorrey at law, of Chattanooga, was born May ee sss. iD Mecea. Trumbull Co., Ohio. His father was Joseph 1 Case. and his mother’s maiden name was Eliza P. Bidwell. The fecmer was born and reared in Simsbury, the latter in Canton, Conn., and both came from early Puritan stock. They moyed to Trumbull County, Ohio, about 1832, and settled in the dense forests upon the farm upon which the subject of this sketch was born, and where, with the exception ol about four year's during which he resided in the State of New York, he was reared to manhood. Asa boy and young man he was both indus- trious and studious. He made the best use of the common schools of his neighborhood until he was nine years old, alter which, during the spring, summer and autumn, his services were required in the manage- ment of his father’s farm, upon which he was always faithful and effi- cient. Notwithstanding the long hours of severe toil upon the farm, he found recreation during the early hours of the night in the pursuit of useful knowledge, his reading being usually of an historical character, and the winter months were well improved, first in the common and then in the select or high schools, then so numerous on the Western Reserve. By the time he arrived at the age of fourteen he had well mastered the branches of study peculiar to the common school, and then entered upon higher grades ot study. When sixteen years old he entered the West- ern Reserve Seminary at Farmington, with a view to preparing tor col- lege. Being without wealth he earned the money with which to pay for his own education. In his eichteenth year he had his first experience as a teacher, and thereatter until the close of his literary studies, he taught in various localities part of the year, and devoted the rest of the time to study. Atter nearly two years in the seminary he began a course in Oberlin College, where he continued to study until shortly before the breaking out of the war of the Rebellion. Believing that the institution of slavery was a national curse, a curse to the slaveholder as well as to the slave, and believing that the war was caused by that institution, and was to be carried on in 1 ist necessarily result ‘+n its destruction, or 1 the overthrow of the Government, he deemed it his duty to abandon his studies in the midst of his course and respond to the call of his country ¢ the first to volunteer from his native county, ts interest by the one side, and hence that the war mt Accordingly he was one 0 as a private soldier on the 18th ot April, 1861, im Company H, nt. Ohio Volunteer Infantry. In the organization of the The company went at once enlisting Seventh Regime company he was elected orderly sergeant. to Camp Taylor, in Cleveland, Ohio, where the r and sent thence to Camp Dennison. In the reorganization of the regi- eciment was made up9 pee eee aa aera tT ng, SOPRA i SIL ST SS SA See wii see a enema ae te . a pet A So ae Se + s a et a So i _ b Ee Te ee be — cent ee aS po ciety uh a BE Se a # Oe a erg —— Wal 4 Hi i | nt eat [ mia ale i eh ah fl a a iy 4 } } Ha | Wy i tit ant a Ha oe : |r }) i! } it ha PO ee tld nae i ae ANA Ue i i i Wee Wt le Waa ds ey i il / i HG eee ati oul Hi Ua a il | | |W i) Ne ey de malls ai ik t va | WM a j r } HD Wa A ai eal | He MPa ae i} Fa iL ik i a oa uit |} Wh a a WS a WE ma A een Feehan Be an i ae i va Q18 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. ment for the three years’ service, young Case was elected second lieu- tenant, and about six months afterward was promoted to first lieuten- ant. In these various positions he served through the arduous cam- paigns in West Virginia, participating in nearly all the engagements, until the spring of 1862, when he resigned and raised a company of which he became captain—Company QC, of the Kighty-fourth Regiment, Ohio Volunteer Infantry. This was a four months’ regiment, but it served a little over five months at Cumberland, Md. Capt. Case was appointed proyost-marshal and commandant of the post which included a territory some twelve miles square, and in which was located a hospital, occupied by from 10,000 to 15,000 sick and convalescent soldiers. All the troops of the little department thus fell under his command, and it includad officers ranking him in grade, as high as colonels, but so well did he perform his duties that Gov. David Todd, haying sent ex-Goy. Dennison to Cumberland to ascertain who was a proper person to recruit the HKighty-fourth Regiment for the three years’ service, upon the mus- tering out of the regiment from the four months’ service, handed Capt. Case a commission as colonel to recruit the regiment for the three years’ serv- ice. This appointment was wholly unsolicited and unexpected. Col. Case entered upon the work with ardor and enthusiasm, continuing some two and a half months, when, upon the order of the Governor, his regi- ment and the One Hundred and Twenty-fourth were consolidated, he ordered to assume command and to report at once to Cincinnati. But at the solicitation of Col. Oliver Payne, an arrangement was made by which the latter took command and led the new regiment to the field, and Col. Case ordered to continue recruiting the Kighty-fourth Regiment. How- ever, being somewhat tired of the service, he obtained consent to retire, and at once entered upon a law course at the Uuiversity of Michigan, from which he graduated March 29, 1864, taking the degree of LL. B. On the 23d of June, 1863, he married Miss Caroline KE. Kibbee, taking her with him to Ann Arbor during his last year in the University. The vacation was largely spent in a course of analytical chemistry in the laboratory of the University. After graduation he spent some time in special work in the army in the South, but didnot re-enter active service. He began the practice of his profession at Youngstown, Ohio, where he lived until March, 1869, when he removed to Des Moines, lowa, where he led an active life as vice-president of the State Insurance Company, which, under his energetic management, met with phenomenal success. But here came to him dark days and full of trouble, the most trying ordeal of his life.. His young wife, a son of seven years and a son of four months, all apparently in the vigor of health, were suddenly strickenHAMILTON COUNTY. 919 with disease, and all died within the short space of five days, and all lay dead in his house April 28, 1872. The effect of this blow was so great that, after struggling for twenty months to recover from it, he deemed it necessary to change the scene of his labors, and removed to Chattanooga about May 1, 1874. Here he married Janie M. Spooner, a friend of long standing, with whom he has since lived in most happy relations. In Chattanooga he has earnestly pursued his chosen profession, and he is universally recognized as an able lawyer and useful citizen. In his adopted city he held the office of city attorney from November, 1876. to November, 1878, to the satisfaction of the authorities and the people. He was the candidate for Congress on the Republican ticket in the Third Congressional District, in 1880, and received nearly 10,000 votes, the largest vote given a Republican in the district up to that time, the result of the most brilliant canvass ever made by any candidate in the district. In 1882 he was elected to the Lower House of the State Legislature, and in 155 { he was elected to the State Senate, and declined a4 renomination in 1886, on the plea that politics made him poor. In all of his official positions he has been active, attentive and faith- fulin the discharge of his duties, and his record is exceedingly credita- ble to him. Open and frank in disposition, he shirks no duty, and is untiring in its pursuit and unsatisfied until it is performed. He isa deliberate, argumentative and convincing speaker, and has the moral courage to express his convictions without fear or favor. Once convinced that a measure is right he stands by it on principle, 1f need be, against the world. Harnestly believing in universal education and in universal civil and political rights, he boldly proclaims his views, oftentimes in defiance of popular sentiment, and yet with due regard to the right of others to entertain contrary convictions. By his first wife Col. Case has one son living, Frank Luther Case. He was born in Youngstown, Ohio, December 10, 1866. He went through the eraded schools in Chatta- nooga, and oraduated in the high «chool in June, 1883. He then spent two years in the Grant Memorial’ University, Athens, Tenn., and since then has been two years 10 Oberlin College, Ohio. He will enter the senior class in that institution in June, 1887. As a sophomore he was elected one of nine in a class ot eighty-five to represent the class in the junior oratorical exercises which occured about May 15, 1887, in which he acquitted himself with credit. He has also been elected one of six of his class for the senior oratorical contest to occur 1n June, 1888. He is a fine musician and a fine German and classical scholar. Wilford Caulkins, A. M., late professor of ancient languages in \ Chattanooga University, 1s a son of John G. and Nancy (Lee) Caulkins, —an ape Saar mr rT REE DEG i i BG eo Pigg A aaa na SS Rsioans Laine: aT a, S aa ae EET tener Ie =e i rg — te Sede Tania ee ae ‘mene Loe aypatinn San emma abe ia —— eee aan : a oe ee 7 he ia 2 ae Tne lie Sa NO SRS Te egy 920) BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. both natives of New York. The mother was a cousin of the noted philanthropist, George I. Seney, of Brooklyn, N. Y., and also a cousin of Mary Ingraham, wife of the late Bishop Gilbert Haven. After her marriage to Mr. Caulkins they lived in their native State until 1869, when they moved to Knox County, Tenn., where the mother died in IST Ue He has been a life-long worker in the Methodist Episcopal Church, as For a livelihood the father followed merchandising and farming. was also his wife. He is now living in Knoxville, Tenn., and is seventy-four years of age. Their family consisted of six children. Dr, Douglas Caulkins, of Knoxville, is one of this family. Our subject was born July 30, 1852, in Duchess County, N. Y., and was the oldest child born to his parents. private school in his native State. His preparatory education was received in a At leisure hours he assisted his father in the store, and, after coming to T’ennessee, he worked on the farm and was also elerk in a store in Knoxville for a number of He entered the East Tennessee Wesleyan University in 1876, © years. from which institution he graduated in 1880 with the first honors of his class. Rev. Richard J. theological work on the “Doctrine of the Resurrection,’ was a mem- Cooke, D. D., author of a celebrated ber of the same class. While in college he was tutor in Latin and Greek, and after graduating was elected professor of Latin in his alma mater. Later he was also placed in charge of the department of Greek. In May, 1886, he resigned at that place to accept the chair of ancient languages in Chattanooga University. In January, 1887, after the inauguration of Goy. R. L. Taylor, Prof. Caulkins’ name was urged for the position of State superintendent of public instruction by several of the leading journals of the State, including the Chattanooga Times, the Knoxville Journal, the Knoxville Tribune and the Athens Post. He was not, however, an applicant for the position and made no effort to secure it. In 1877 Miss Laura D. Tenn., became his wife, and to them were born three daughters. Prof. and Mrs. Caulkins are Methodists. superior endowments and culture and one whose services the university O’Brien, a native of Greenville, Both The Professor is a man of was considered fortunate in securing. His professional services were eminently satisfactory to the authorities of the university, but in March, 1587, finding himself not in harmony with the proposed policy of the institution in educating white and coloréd students together, he resigned oO his position. He is now conducting a private school in Chattanooga. James A. Caldwell, attorney and president of the Chattanooga Gas ais N Se ty a sas i . : : e au 2 Light Company, is a native of Hamilton County, but was reared principally in Monroe County, Tenn. He was educated in the University of Virginia,XG Se ) Dans GE eS GET) Aa Se bets a 2 HAMILTON COUNTY. 991 and served four years in the Fifty-ninth Tennessee Infantry (which was eu mounted part of the time). After the war he came to Chattanooga in 1867, | aud practiced law alone until 1870, when he was elected Glonoandenece ter, and held this position until 1876, after which he resumed the prac- tice of law alone. In 1873 he was united in marriage to Elizabeth S. Gillespie, a native of Roane County, Tenn., and the daughter of Gen. George L. Gillespie. The fruits of this union were four children, three of whom are living. In 1884 Mr. Caldwell formed a partnership with H. L. Turney, whose death occurred in 1885, since which time our sub- ject has conducted the practice alone. He hasbeen president of the gas company since 15/3, and was director of that company previous to that date. He assisted in the organization of the Forest Hill Cemetery Com- pany, being at different times director, secretary and treasurer of the same. Mr. Caldwell and family are members of the First Presbyterian Church, of which he is an elder. His parents, O. H. P. and Jane (John- ston) Caldwell, are natives of Monroe County, Tenn. The father’s death occurred in Georgia in 1854. The mother, now Mrs. William M. Stately, is living in Alabama. A. ©. Carey, city engineer, was born in the Keystone State, but was | reared in Cincinnati, Ohio, and received his edueation in the public schools of that city. While in the city of Cincinnati he practiced civil engineering for several years prior to coming to Chattanooga, and was well qualified to fill the position of city engineer in this city. He accepted his present position February 1, 1881. He has stock in sev- | eral business enterprises of Chattanooga. His father, EK. H. Carey, was also a native of Pennsylvania, where he followed the harness-maker’s trace. He afterward came to Cincinnati and superintended the con- struction of several different street railroad lines until his death, which occurred in 1883. The mother, A. M. (Juvinal) Carey, was also born | in the Keystone State, and is now a resident of Cincinnati. : Pos Gash principal of high school and Second District of Chatta- ) nooga, is a son of Henry and Eunice (Brown) Cash, both natives of the Buckeye State. The mother died in 1854, but the father is still living in Ohio, engaged as a farmer and stock grower. He has been married twice since the death of his first wife. Our subject is the eldest child by the first marriage, and was born in Belmont County, Ohio, January 16, 1849. He was educated in the common schools and at Mount Union Col- lege, located in Mount Union, Ohio, having graduated from that institu- tion in 1880. By teaching and soing to school alternately, he worked his way through college, and is considered a first-class educator. Pre- | vious £6 coming to Chattanooga in 1886, he was principal of the Bellaire A 4 i 4Poreebe akaeanat anit aloes eset Be on i ses ss oe vit sa ypteneesii pee ey tae Pigeons: peg me ee ene oe een nl gy Stony eae aan, ed arena eet aah eat ati te a enna anata nea dn ee a =~ < oF palma ae GSM AB RS ET a eee eee Sess psesesssnensncne 922 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. (Ohio) High School and also of the high school at Atchison, Kas. He is an excellent citizen and a member of the Methodist Episcopal Church. Hiram S. Chamberlain was born at Franklin, Portage Co., Ohio, August 6, 1835, the fourth in a family of eight children born to Leander aad Susanna (Willey) Chamberlain. ‘The parents were natives of Ver- mont, the father’s birth occurring in Addison County, April 16, 1804, as were also his father, Leander, born in 1766 and his grandfather. Peleg, who was born in 1736. The mother was a native of New Haven; she died in March 1887. In the year 1540 the family moved to Cuya- hoga County, Ohio, where the father died in August, 1884. Hiram S. received his education at what is now Hiram College, attending that institution during President Garfield’s tutorage. He taught school win- ters during his stay at Hiram, but left college in order to go to the front to In July, 1861, he enlisted as a fight for the preservation of the Union. y private in the Second Ohio Volunteer Cavalry, and remained at Camps Chase and Dennison until December of that year, when his regiment was ordered to the front. The first month . o ~ ero ve os EO 1,17 ) (26) rac > . ees a" appointed quartermaster-sergeant; in October, 1862, was commissioned after his enlistment h2 was second lieutenant, and February 26, 1863, he was promoted to first lieuten- ant and regimental quartermastsr. He was quartermaster of Carter’s cavalry division under Gen. Burnside at Knoxville, when itwas captured from the Confederates in September, 1863. May 24, 1864, he was com- missioned captain and assistant quartermaster by President Lincoln, and At the close of the war, Capt. Chamberlain engaged in the iron business. to which during the remainder of the war served in that capacity. he has since chiefly devoted his attention. He resided at Knoxville until 1871, then removed to Chattanooga, and is at present president and man- ager of the Roan Iron Company, also president and leading stockholder of the Citico Furnace Company, and vice-president of the First National Bank. Capt. Chamberlain is one of the best posted men on mineral- ogy in the South, and it is to his knowledge of this valuable science that September 4, 1867, he married Miss Amelia I. Morrow, who was born at Knoxville, December 3, 1841. Six children have been born to them. all] at Knoxville except the youngest two, who were born at Chattanooga: Minnie Morrow, born January 28, 1869; Mary Hattie, born July 9, 1871, died November 9, 1873; Susie Willey, born June 4, 1874, Louise A., born May 23) 18aqe Morrow, born December 12. 1579, and Hiram Sanborn. born June 26, 1882. Milton L, Chapman, a native of Elyria, Ohio, was born February 3, his present financial prosperity is largely due. SS poorer ceaeeaneanesdne reg eee Seta eae er anHAMILTON COUNTY. 923 A$53. He was reared and educated in the Buckeye State. In December, 1570, he came to Chattanooga, and engaged in the milling business with his father, Henry Z. Chapman, until February, 1874, when he engaged in the real estate business at this place, which he has continued successiully to the present time. He is president of the Chattanooga Chair Company, and was secretary of the Iron & Coal Association of Chattanooga for four years, and at present is one of the board of man- agers of the same. He is now one of the directors of the Gadsden ( Ala. ) Land & Improvement Company, and is also identified with other enter- prises in the city. He is manager of Spring Lake Improvement Com- pany. This lake is situated four miles southeast of Chattanooga, in Georgia. The object of the company is to make the lake a pleasure resort, and supply Chattanooga with water in the future. In 1871 Mr. Chapman married Miss Carrie B. Gibbs, of Ohio, and three living children are the result of this union—one son and two daughters. Mr. Chapman is a Republican in politics, and a wide-awake business man. Thomas H. Cheek was born in Rappahannock County, Va., October 20, 1836, and is a son of Elijah and Mary (Holtzman) Cheek, both natives of Virginia. The subject of this sketch removed with his parents to Memphis, Tenn., in 1848, where he resided until 1861. and then entered the Confederate service, being in the ordnance department under Col. Hunt for four years. After cessation of hostilities he established a flour-mill in Macon, Ga., and also followed the same business in Mari- = etta until May. 1886, when he came to Chattanooga, but is still inter- ested in the flour business in Georgia. In 1859 he wedded Mary M. . Reid, a native of Courtland, Ala., who presented him with three children, only one, a daughter, living. Mr. Cheek is a good citizen, and a mem- ber of the Presbyterian Church. J. J. Clift, farmer, and clerk in the Soddy Coal Company’s store, was born May 28, 1838, in Hamilton County, where he now resides. He is the youngest of seven children born to William and Nancy A. (Brooks) Clift. William Clift was born December 5, 1795, in Greene County, Tenn., and came to Hamilton County about 1828. He organized the Seventh Tennessee Regiment, of which he was colonel, enlisted in the fall of 1861, and was a very warm supporter of the stars and stripes. Hearing | that they were threatened by the Confederates, this regiment disbanded and fled to Kentucky. He was captured while returning from carrying some dispatches from Gen. Burnside to Gen. Rosecrans. He was taken to Atlanta, where he was retained in captivity about four months. He then made his escape in February, 1864, and reached home the same month. He was magistrate of his district eighteen years, and was alsome ei “ 8 Be i aa Sag Sarasa naan cy Sic cal eog bet er reo apnea god a5 ai ee ee ee a * Be Mag BO on #é . ea 3 eater ie aids Seen et ee ae zs Pais a EPS ater marcas oor as La aOR a OE - - i at ns a Siem = Pr fe aes an é # ar = “ewes pp dt 0 | if ; f carer a sont ah ele dhe asic eget pg ag Bis Beit | ii pe itt i ga aenealgaienepebam-woomiois Lin ang wie lef hs yan nh nA cp naninatiaieadity nies RE Sa eee Oa = aa a ae ata Sige ne me c i Fan ell Ate re ment im. . es — i a * oe oor: STS on a = a Sea aS Puente ee Saunas in — O94 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. colonel of the State militia. He was greatly harassed by the Confed- erates during the late war, but to the last remained a stanch Union man. He was also a very fine business man, and when he died his effects were estimated to be worth $1,000,000. He died February 17, 1886, aged ninety. Mrs. Clift was born February 22, 1795, in Hast Mean casee: she died August 17, 1847. Our subject received a fair edu- cation in the common schools of Hamilton County, and finished at Sale Greek Academy. He married Miss Elizabeth L. Reveley, of Dayton, Tenn. Mrs. Clift was born February 12, 1843, and died February 12, 1870. leaving three children: Nancy A., W. Robert, and Elizabeth J., now attending the Female College, at Rogersville, Tenn. Mr. Clift and family are members of the Presbyterian Church. In politics Mr. Clift is Denrocrat casting his first presidential vote for John Bell. He was elected justice of the peace in 1876, and still holds that office. He has olyen universal satisfaction 1n ie discharge ot the duties of this office. ( n o H e has been deacon ot the es to which he belones for the past elcht J. H. Cleave, manager for A. G. Rhodes & Co., furniture dealers, 111 and 113 West Eighth Street, Chattanooga, is a native of McMinn County, 4 Tenn., and was reared and educated at Athens, Tenn. He followed agri- cultural pursuits until he came to Chattanooga in 1880. Hethen engaged in the grocery trade at this place until he accepted his present position in 1882. In 1875 he was united in marriage to Miss Tipton Bradford, a native : oe 1 4 AR : |] Qa : Ce ey se = ow Se 7h a - : of Jefferson County. Tenn.: and the fruits ot this wnion were four 4 7 a i= : ol . loo ° ANSTO . : ] a . 1 eet CG ildren. only CWO OL WHOM are living. Alexanclet1 and Pier EUtH ( Hurst ) Cleage, the } nts of our subject, were natives of Virginia and ‘l'’ennes- see, respecti ie The father died at Athens, ee Co., Tenn., in 1875; the m él ris now residing in Gee The individual mem- bers ot the firm of A. G. Rhodes & Co. are A. G. Rhodes. Atlanta. and A. C. Seuddy, Nashville. They began business in Chattanooga in 1881, and lle furniture on the installment plan. They are live, wide-awake men, i nan and are doing a good business. Je We @linkt. bookkeeper and manager of the Soddy Coal Company store since 1874, and one of the principal stockholders of the same, was born in 1828. He is a son of William:and Nancy A. (Brooks) Clift, and was born and reared in Hamilton County. He was educated principally at the common schools, and attended two terms at Harrison Academy. In 1549 he Metieil Liss McKenzie, a daughter of Samuel and Elizabeth F. (Huston) McKenzie. Nine children were the fruits of this union, six of whom are living: Nancy E. (Mrs. Miles); William, bookkeeper for the Soddy Coal Company; Nina Wallace, Joseph W.=) Rye: or ness 9 cf o PRG Pets eat uA o nt Me H.J. SPRINGFIELD n ; i fi de Se i i | iLS ea, aa sa age FFT PL RATE e Seal Fe SE) Rape coe meme oo Pas wg ~ ET g m 7 a TRIE TO ema ie << AOA ARETE var ——" mr re os ei = — fs x abe a ee tie ~ oo > les —_ <= - ne = Pd cm 3 A at TE TE RII Fon - a ai SE i mmc “ Sn Neg mei cating racer ines naan sengeecaal rena aeo MARTE ir wee ee ne Pisa onal ara a SF a lM ac RN a aL aN Deal, «ena mlgRocmninde alone = - a = tan 52 racy a ee aiiceneaeamene we maser tcy diaieice a ees eee ee Tiree ape et any Sree sl Rah E eee ete = oe i Se _ » . é et > ‘s Tei aaa ins ee 7 . er Cre ee eres ie - ‘ , ; t Hit de Mle Hi 4 He abHAMILTON COUNTY. G25 Aldine, Wingenund | deceased). Bruce and James. Mr. Clift is of Seotch- Hag Irish descent. In1861 he enlisted in the war and served almost contin- wously until the final surrender. He was made captain of Company A, m e ¥ | ml : | 2 Thirty-sixth Tennessee Infantry, and upon th e reorganization he came home for a short time. He enlisted shortly after in ( Capt. Starne’s. com- pany, Fourth Tennessee C avalry, and was promoted to a leutenane sy, and hortly thereafter detached and placed upon duty in the adjutant-general’s department where he served until the ck ose of the war. He Was aamolladl at- Meridian, Miss., Mayel3y i865: | Mn Cliche actively engaged in several mining and manutacturing enterprises. He is one of the prin- cipal stockholders in the Sod ly Coal Company, Waldou’s Ridge Coal Com- pany, of Sale Creek, Tennessee, and in the Owita Coal C ompany, of Arkan- sas, and he is also connected with the rolling mill, at Cee The Soddy Coal Mines were first opened by a company of Welshmen from Ohio in 1867. Mr. Clift is a De mocrat in polities, and he and wife are members of the Pre ‘sbyterian Church. WE, Jal, Olkngp attorney, of the firm of Cooke, Clift & Cooke, is a native of Hamilton County, and the son of Col. William C lift, a native of Greene County, Tenn. The father was reared in Knox C ounty, and came to Hamilton C ounty about 1825, residing at Sod ly until his death in 1866. He \ was colonel of the State militia many years, and during the war was _col- Ne onely o Federal Army. From 1848 to 1855 he was commissioner of eS; improvement for the United States Government. The mother. Nancy (Brooks) Clift, was a nativeof Knox C ounty, and died in this county in 1847. Our subject was reared and educated in Hamilton County, and at the commencement of hostilities enlisted in the Fourth Tennessee Con- federate Cavalry. He was paroled at Columbus, Ga.. being at that time on Debrill’s staff. He was admitted to the bar just prior to the war, and at its termination came to Chatt; anooga and began prac ticing his profes- sion in the firm of Wallace & Clift, where he remained one year. After practicing alone for a few months he became a member of the firm of Clift & McRee, then Clift & Baté, then Clift. Bate & Cooke, then Clift & Cooke, and finally, January 1, 1837, the firm of Cooke, Clift & Cooke was formed. Our subject is president of the Soddy Coal Company and Wal- den Ridge Coal Company, also director in the Mutual Gas Company and the Home Insurance Company. In 1867 he married Miss A. C. Cooke, who bore him two children; she died in 1876. In 1883 he married Miss Florence Parrott, of Cartersville, Ga., and to this union have been born two children, both living. Mr. Clift is a member of the Masonic fraternity and of the K. of P. Webster J. Colburn, of Chattanooga, was born in Chatauqua County 58z 5 awe | = ve Sy He as a iol. i Ss ee % ot ae eee cee on acme oe 4 Siren ia kai es pias, i roam areesmadians en : : ce y Sr ep ees al eager tat ey ae . my j = : ete Ras ee ae SS se et . rx =r I ary ye SSE om e eae ge As ps i eer thaetang gi penance an mye . o ; . Tat tM 5 oP ee SE el cede ee OF BS wm 2 a Ce a ihacse~ ey 3 es Sa ree a ae — ae ~ . ~ Sa 5 z See ae 2 ‘ = an = ae it ms : mie oae ae Re oes a —— = a - - ~ “ eee merase ~— a = og Be = aati et eiibohemais oe pune sella iss 4 see is singe Naina naieedl ware cae oa BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. 7 Ce mame —— Dr. David G. Curtis is the son of H. W. and Eleanor Kames Curtis, natives of New York and Massachusetts, respectively. They were mar- ried in Jamestown, N. Y., where they lived until the death of the father, which occurred in 1871. After the death of the father the mother came to Chattanooga to reside with her children, three of whom had preceded her to this place. She died in 1887 at the advanced age of eighty years. The subject of our sketch was born in Jamestown, Chautauqua Co., N. Y., on the 20th of July, 1886. fair educational advantages, his father, though not rich, being a mer- During his youth and minority he had very chant, possessed liberal means and gave his son David, with his other children (of whom there were four besides David—two sons and two daughters), fair opportunity for the acquisition of knowledge and intellect- ual training. At the age of twenty our subject began the study of med- icine and finished his course in 1858, graduating from Berkshire Medical College, Massachusetts. Desiring to study the diseases of the Missis- sippi Valley, he attended the Hahnemann Medical School of St. Louis, and afterward located in southwestern Missouri to practice his profession. In 1863 he yolunteered in the United States Navy at Mound City, Ill, serving as assistant surgeon on the United States steamer, ‘‘ Carondolet,” In 1865 he married Miss Sarah R. Edmiston, of Huntsville, Ohio, who has borne him three children, two of whom are until the close of the war. living—both boys. He practiced his profession in Ohio until 1871, when he came to Chattanooga, where be has since resided. practicing medicine. oo) He has been a member of the board of health nine years and is now its vice-president. He went through the various epidemics that have scourged our city since his arrival in it, the cholera in 1873, the yellow fe ver in1878, and the small-pox in 1883, rendering heroic and efficient service in them all. He is now a member of the city school board and has been for some time. He has also been quite successful in real estate deals as well as an able practitioner. He is one of the original number who established the Ice & Cold Storage Company of Chattanooga, and is now its vice-president and one of its directors. The Doctor is a man of rather radical views on most questions and has the courage of his convic- tions. He always talks ‘“‘from the shoulder out” and his position on He believes in the Darwinian theory of the “survival of the fittest.”’ He is destined to make his impress on the community, in which he lives. any question can be easily ascertained. Warren A. Dewees, agent of the Southern Express Company, is a son of Thomas and Wilhelmina ( Pennypacker ) Dewees, the father a native of Pennsylvania, and the mother of Virginia. After marriage they set- tled in Ohio, where the father followed the bricklayer’s trade. Of theirHAMILTON COUNTY. 931 family of seyen sons, our subject is the fifth. He was born January NU 1853, in Stark County, Ohio, was educated in the public schools, and while growing up learned his father’s trade. In 1869. he came to Chat- tanooga, and worked at his trade until 1872, when he engaged as driver for the Southern Express Company, and has held all the positions in the office up to the highest, having fourteen men under his supervision. Heis a Mason, a Knight Templar, a Knight of Honor, and is an excellent citizen. Hon. William Henry DeWitt, whose name and fame are alike familiar to all residents of Hamilton County and toa large portion of the State, and whose portrait adorns this work, isa native Tennessean, born in Smith County October 24, 1827. His father, Rev. Samuel De- Witt, was born in South Carolina in 1792, and was an officer in the war of 1812 under Gen. Jackson. His mother was a McWhirter, and both branches of the family were of old Revolutionary war stock. The early years of the subject of this sketch were passed upon the farm, his few hours spared from work being employed in the laudible effiort of trying to secure an education. So limited were his advantages that he had to master the lower branches of mathematics and the first books of Latin without the aid of an instructor. For ten months he attended Berea Academy, near Chapel Hill, Tenn., under the tuition of Rev. John M. Branes, one of the old time educators of the State. After attaining man- hood he resided at Gainsboro for two years as an instructor in the Mont- pelier Academy. The succeeding two years he passed in Jackson County as teacher, aud from 1850 to 1856, he lived at La Fayette where he taught school one year and practiced law five years, having acquired the latter profession entirely by his own exertions. For about one year he practiced his chosen profession at Lebanon, and from 1858 to 1875, con- tinued the same at Carthage, in his native county, where he achieved much success. Both before and since the war some of the most able men of Tennessee have been made lawyers under his instructions, and for which he never asked compensation. In 1855—56 he was the represen- tative to the Lower House of the State Legislature from the counties of Smith, Macon and Sumner, a position for which he declined the renom- ination. In 1861 he was an opponent of the constitutional convention of the State which was defeated, and the same year was elected to a seat in the Confederate Congress. Goy. Brown, in 1862, appointed him special chancellor of the Fifth Chancery Division of Tennessee pending an election contest. In politics | he was a_ W. Vhig, faithful at and ardent, but et when the war_came on he espoused | the cause of the Confeder acy and has since @ affiliated Ww ith the Democratic | arty. At “Nashville, “in 1876, he a edag ai ae Mn ae a ie. ee me Oe a Re wegen tg or =s a a HI ff | LI Ht | i i ib i mua i { fey dciay | bigest } | bea i be f i} Pha) fr 5 | - j et | ia ‘ee 8 t at rad By ; at Wi al 1 fat OFT hig et a Nir ha pg psec Spee a, a ce Saati» Sai aiden “ = ee an oe Ga PRS ga NATE SRT Sol patie viremia ries ey A> eo = - = mace _ eT aa aE Ee yi rs Se pentane mes —— Wi at tia j ty H) it =i ee Ae tee tne ee ee e ane oe a See nica 982 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. to the National convention at St. Louis, which nominated Goy. Tilden for the presidency, and in 1878 was a member of the State Judicial Con- vention. May 30, 1847, Miss became his wife, and to their union Emilia, daughter of Thomas Price. five children have been born. two dying in infancy and only one nowliving. His second marriage occurred May 30, 1867, to Miss Elizabeth Wilson, a direct Boone: and two children are the fruit of their marriage. a Mason. an Oddfellow and a Methodist. the ablest lawyers of the State, and is possessed of the highest sense of descendant of Daniel Mr. DeWitt is He is justly regarded as one of honor and justice. His friends are legion, his enemys few, if any. L. J. de Sabla, farmer and gardener, was born June 11, 1832. at Pointe a Pitre, Guadeloupe, West Indies. He is the third of five children born to Marquis de Joly de Blayon de Sabla and Eugenie Gallois. The father soldier in the Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte. He died in was buried. The mother was born in 1812 in Pointe.a Pitre. Guadeloupe, West LS7O. excellent educational advantages, and finished at Henry Ly College, at Paris, practiced his profession one year in Pointe, Guadeloupe, West Indies. was a 100 days’ service under 1865, in Panama. where he Panama in Indies: she died in Our subject had most France. He also secured a good medical education, and In 1849, he went with his father to Panama and engaged in civil In 1853, he came to New Orleans. La., and from there went to a health resort, on the Cumberland Moun- tor the benefit of his health. Narramore, daughter of Judge Narramore, of Cumberland County, Tenn. Tenn., and by her union with our subject, became the mother of six children: Catherine Helen, Joseph Ernest, Mary Octavia (Mrs. George H. Cushman), James Theodore. Fielding Eugene and Matilda Alice. Mr. de Sabla was elected and served as civil engineer of Cumberland engineering on the Panama Canal. tains. He married Miss Paulene Nanev Mrs. de Sabla was born January 4,1841,in Cumberland County. County, Tenn., eight years, was also county court clerk of the same county for several years, and served as clerk and master under Hon. D. McKey. Mr. de Sabla has been quite successful, and owns 120 aeres of fine land just beyond the city limits on the south; 170 acres in Georgia, and Mrs. de Sabla and children are members of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and Mr. de Sabla is : member of the Catholic Church. He was formerly a Whig, but since the war he has voted with the Republican party. W. M. Dorsey. farmer. is the 3,700 aeres in Cumberland County. Tenn. youngest of eight children, four of whom are now living, born to D. and A. (Duekworth ) Dorsey. The father was born about 1776, in Burke County. N. C.. and came to MeMinn CountyHAMILTON COUNTY. 933 in 1829, where he died about 1876. upwardof one hundred years old. The mother was born in 1780, also in Burke County, N. C., and died about 1856. They were both active Christian workers in the Presbyterian Church. Mrs. Dorsey’s father, John Duckworth.was a soldier in the Revolutionary war, and was wounded at the battle of King’s Mountain. Her orand- father came from Ireland to America some time before the Revolutionary war. Oursubject was born in 1824, in McMinn County, Tenn., and came to Hamilton County in 1869, received an average education in the schools of McMinn County, and lived with and assisted his father on the farm until thirty-five years of age, when he married Miss Barbara L. Wilkins. daughter of A. S. and Lavina ( Wallick) Wilkins, both natives of North Carolina. They came to Hamilton County about 1840, where they still reside. Eleven children were the results of our subject’s marriage: John and Mary (twins), Louvina (Mrs. Varnell), Dimmon A., Hattie, Willie N., Charles 8. and four who died in infancy. Mr. Dorsey is a Democrat in politics, and cast his first presidential vote for Franklin Pierce in 1848. He began life a comparatively poor man, and what he is now worth was gotten by his own industry and good management. He owns a good farm of 160 acres on the Western & Atlantic Railroad. It is well improved and located eight miles éast of Chattanooga. He is a Master Mason, joining the order in 1856, and he and wife are members of the Missionary Baptist Church. J. D. Dobbs, farmer, was born February 2, 1840, in Cobb County, Ga. He came to Hamilton County in 1855, and has resided here ever since. He was educated in the military school at Marietta, Ga., also at the Chattanooga High School, and was a short time in attendance at Burrell College, Spencer, Tenn. In 1858 he married Miss Nancy Rob- erts, daughter of Commodore and Jane (Bunch) Roberts. Mrs. Dobbs was born in October, 1839, in Sequatehie Valley, Tennessee, and her marriage resulted in the birth of eight children: Joseph D. (deceased), Anna, Maria (Mrs. F. M. Gossett), James M., Minnie S. (deceased), John, Gorden, and Lewis David (deceased). Mr. Dobbs is a Democrat in pol- itics. May 10, 1861, he enlisted in Company H, Second Tennessee Cav- alry, and was orderly sergeant of the same. He served two years. He is one of the heirs to 175 acres of land adjoining the city limits. His parents, James M. and Maria (Stanley) Dobbs, are of English and Irish descent respectively. The father was a major of Cobb’s company of Geor- gia Rangers during the Mexican war. He was a brave soldier and parti- cipated in all the principal battles of that war. He was born in Elbert County, Ga., December 24, 1818, and died September 10, 1869. The mother was born in Cobb County, Ga., and died when the subject ofSS ee 3 Se ke RS ere “7. mee reece ee a a eo ee sisiian eee ee enon cline Fale eget a ili pa Pea geo oe oe pe mgieucreptowweerss int lf alge . q + | * Fr ; 3 me | a - ; f ft t Fit cre i ree : bE i " i \ = 7 f a Sains sean ae IG RW 7 a edn: = a es Tee das nel eta lee mie BS a Seen By Na tt a i nat i tar t : | 4 if Pe } » il vy ’ ate 4 Be 7h By # i i ene ee lilt ure Rie i dae Diaeditcfinis ies oe aes - Ba mt rs pene sa eer gatalee ~ fas NSE RNa Oo Le “ Eee reiiars mates ne eT - SS eee ~ ae aa = : : = é - fi ry ee are as - ms gg Ree emt og, = RI ap er emg Poh i nat leaner oa elt SSE: a tee Nee = ‘ i eae nabea SS SSSR PREC aaa APPENDIX. BIOGRAPHICAL 934 this sketch was but eighteen months old. His grandfather, David Dobbs, was born and reared in Elbert County, Ga., and commanded a regi- ment in the Seminole war. His maternal grandfather, Dr. Lewis Stan- ley. was born in South Carolina and was among the first emigrants to Gab County. Ga. He was a successful medical practitioner in that county. G W. Drake, M. D., a successful practitioner of Chattanooga, is the son of Samuel B. and Sarah J. (Ball) Drake, both natives of Virginia, where they were reared and married. In-early life the father was alaw- yer, afterward a merchant and lastly a farmer; he died about 184S. The mother is still living and is about seventy years of age. Of their family of five children, three of whom are living, our subject is the aldaen He was born April 4, 1842, in Powhattan County, Va., and received a classical education in Richmond College of the same State. In 1861 he enlisted in Powhattan Troops Confederate Cavalry, being the first troops at Manassas Junction. In-1864 he was wounded in the right arm near Spottsylvania which disabled him from further duty. After the war he taught school and studied medicine, graduating from Vanderbilt University in 1876 as M. D. Soon after this he came to Chattanooga. He is vice-president 'of the State Medical Association, having held that position two years, and was vice-president of the Chattanooga Medical Association. By his union to Miss Elmira Wood he became the father of two children—one son and one daughter. His first wife died, and in 1873 he married Miss Laura Whitehead, who bore him two children, both deceased. Dr. Drake isa successful physician and has practiced his pro- fession for about eleven years. Heis a Royal Arch Mason and a man well respected. Louis Dunmeyer, of Chattanooga, was born in Hardy County, Va., August 11, 1842, son of Jacob and Catherine Dunmeyer, both natives of Germany. He moved to Pittsburgh, Penn., with his parents in 1846, where he was reared and educated. In 1863 he enlisted in the United States Navy, serving as fireman in this department under Admr. Dahl- gren until the close of the war. In 1869 he married Miss Lottie Sayles in Buffalo, N. Y.; she died in 1871 without issue. In 1872 Mr. Dun- meyer came to Chattanooga where he became a partner in the Enter- prise Machine Works, and has continued in that capacity ever since. He is a Republican, a member of the I. O. O. F., the K. of P., and is a suc- cessful business man. Harry W. Durand, attorney and counsellor at law, is a native Hoosier, Jackson being the county of his birth. He received his early education from the excellent system of public schools for which Indiana is noted,HAMILTON COUNTY. Q35 and later attended the graded schools of the city of Bloomington, in Monroe County. He thus acquired an uncommonly good academical education which he still further bettered by a course at the State Uni- versity, situated at Bloomington, which graduated him in 1876. Tater he studied law in that city, and practiced his chosen protession there until 1881 when he came to Chattanooga, and until 1886 was connected with the firm of Wheeler & Marshall. Since that time he has prosecuted his profession alone, and is justly regarded as one of the brightest attorneys at the bar of Hamilton County. October 3, 1883, he united in matri- mony with Miss Jessie Lee Vincent, and their union has been blessed with the birth of one daughter. The father of the subject of this biog- raphy, Dr. J. J. Durand, is a native of Ohio and is a successful practic- ing physician of this county. His mother, whose maiden name was See, is a native Indianian. A. 8. Dunlap, M. D., is ason of James and Margaret (Stewart) Dun- lap, who were born, reared and married in the State of Ohio. The father was a Presbyterian clergyman. The Dunlaps came from Scotland at an early day, and settled in Virginia, and removed from there to Kentucky; a branch also settled in Ohio. Our subject, the eldest of a family of seven children, was born in Madison County, Ohio, May 7, 1836, and graduated from Miami University in 1857, with the degree of A. B., and five years later with the degree of A. M. Previous to entering the university he attended Salem Academy, South Salem, Ross Co., Ohio, to prepare for college. In 1867 he graduated in medicine from the University of Michigan, having taught in the meantime, and read medicine with Dr. A. Dunlap of Springfield, Ohio. From 1870 to 1886, he held the position of first assistant surgeon of the National Military Home near Dayton, Ohio, and from 1871 to 1885 was United States pension examiner and secretary of the pension board. He has been a member of the American Medical Association since 1869, and was also a member of Clark & Mont- gomery Counties (Ohio) Medical Societies. In December, 1886, he came to Chattanooga to enjoy a milder climate, he having become acquainted there some six yearsago. Heis an active member of the Presbyterian Church, and is esteemed by all who know him. Rey. George W. Dumbell, rector of the Episcopal Parish, has three churches under his charge, namely: the Parish Church, St. Paul’s, St. John’s, West Chattanooga, and the Grace Memorial Church, in South Chattanooga. He was born in the Isle of Man, and educated at Rugby and Trinity College, Cambridge, England. Dr. Dumbell, previous to coming to Chattanooga, was successively ° rector of Jackson, Tenn., and St. James’, Milwaukee. He married, in 1557, Georgiana Mary, < ee 3iy ie ; ' ae a eee Ay f RE ay Pal iat th bs | ii I ae at || ara ] mie i£ / i a So eg a rte el Rae ee win = we ai inlet) be Sr A ana eon ‘ eee wins me” ap So 7 * : ipa bt ade tei ja ts na ds alg gk —-~ - = aN eee ace ae ee ies: > SS = SS eee aren emia a CES, a am ee aaa f O38 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. native of Trenton, Tenn., and a graduate of the University of Virginia in 1873. He then returned to Trenton, where he was admitted to the bar the same year. He practiced law alone for about one year, after which he was a member of the firm of Jones & Elder until the date of his ecom- ing to Chattanooga, November, 1576. In 1575, he married Miss Mary Saffarans, a native of Memphis, who bore him five children—one son and four daughters. Mr. Elder practiced in the firm of Elder & Elder until 1882, after which he practiced alone until June of the same year, when the present firm was formed by our subject and George T. White. Our subject was president of the Y. M. C. A. of Chattanooga during 1880 and 1881. and is now a member of the board of directors. His father, John W., is a native of Murfreesboro, Tenn., and is at present president of the Gibson County Bank at Trenton, Tenn. The mother of our subject, Martha G. (Houston) Elder. was a native of Blount County, was reared in Alabama, and died at Trenton in 1578. John W. Elder, Jr., of Chattanooga is a native of T'renton, Tenn.. born August 2, 1853, and a son of Henry L. and Harriet N. ( Houston ) Elder, natives of Tennessee. Our subject was educated in the Univer- sity of Tennessee, and graduated from that institution in 1874. He studied law under ex-Supreme Judge T. J. Freeman and practiced law from 1876 (the time he came to Chattanooga) until 1881, when, on account of failing health, he relinquished the profession, and has since been actively engaged in the real estate and insurance business, representing (ueen of England, Sun, Fire of London; Equitable, of Nashville; Wash- ington Fire and Marine, of Boston, and Fire Insurance Association, of _— London. May 18, 1881, he married Miss B. McMillin, of Chattanooga, a daughter of D. C. MeMillin, Sr. Mr. Elder is a Democrat, a member of the Royal Arcanum and present Commander of American Legion of Honor (local lodge) and also a member of the Methodist Episcopal Chureh South. Hon. H. Clay Evans, a gentleman whose name is synonymous with the business interests and prosperity of Chattanooga, is a native of Juniata County, Penn., his birth occurring in 1843. His parents, Jesse B. and Anna (Shingle) Evans, were also natives of the Keystone State, but re- moved from there to Wisconsin in 1846. where the subject of this sketch was reared and educated. In 1849 the father became infected with the gold fever, and leaving his family crossed to the Pacific Slope, where he engaged in mining. He died in Montana Territory in 1869. As a member of the Union Army, H. Clay Evans participated in its various fortunes until 1864, when he arrived in Chattanooga which has since been his home. For some time he was connected with the Alabama & Chattanooga Rail-HAMILTON COUNTY. 939 road,and was one of the active promoters of the interests of the great Roane Iron Company. From 1874 to 1884 he served as secretary, treasurer. vice-president and general manager of the last named corporation, but in the latter year was elected cashier of the First National Bank which posi- tion he resigned to accept the Republican candidacy for Congress in the Third Congressional District. Mr. Evans entered this contest with a Democratic majority of about 1,700 votes against him, but his known ability and personal popularity cut down the opposing majority to only sixty-eight votes. Besides being the present sole owner of the Nnchion Flouring Mills, the largest in the South, Mr. Evans is the chief stock- holder and manager of the Chattanooga Car & Foundry Company, and is a large stock owner of the Lookout Mountain Inclined Railway Com- pany. He served as city mayor two terms and is now a member of the board of mayor and alderman. Heis a member of the Electric Light Company of Chattanooga, is the owner of one of the finest residences in the city (built at a cost of about $20,000)on Hast Terrace Street, and is, in every sense of the word, a Chattanoogan, with Chattanooga ideas and with the proverbial enterprise of Chattanooga. Mr. Evans is a Sir Knight in Masonry. He married Miss Addie Durand, of Chautauqua County, N. Y., and th4ir union has b3en fruitful in th3 birth of three children. P. Fleming, plumber, steam and gas fitter and dealer in plumber and gas fitters’ supplies, etc., is a native of Ireland, born in 1851. He immigrated to the United States in 1864, and passed several months in New York and Ohio, after which he came to Tennessee and located at Nashville. He remained in that city until 1872, when he removed to Chattanooga, and here followed the plumber’s trade until 1875, after which, in connection with this he added his stock of supphes. He keeps ten men employed, and has a large trade in the city. Im the year 1874 he was united in marriage to Miss Anna O’ Donnell, a native of Chattanooga, who bore him one son, Martin, who was born in 1877. Mrs. Flem- ing’s death occurred in 1878. Our subject's parents, Andrew and Mary (Karrigan) Fleming, were both natives of the Emerald Isle, where the mother still resides. The father died in 1855. James B. Frazier, of the legal firm of Shepherd & Frazier, is a native of the Sequatchie Valley of Tennessee, but was reared principally in the city of Nashville where he had exceptionally good school advan- tages. He pursued the regular course of study at the University of Tennessee, located at Knoxville, from which institution he graduated in 1878, and then began the study of law under the tuition of his father who is recognized as one of the ablest attorneys at the Nash- ville bar -He was admitted to practice in 1879, and the year follow-ne aa ett Sree oe ee 2 aug vps Sealing ‘ - Soe ee 7 mmr a mmeernen mana or aay eee Sa ee ee wees SL ee aa ieee on ae es eee a —- anne thy «Br rm I cng 2 i om le rea mie meee ae erat te ee oi ee ee ag Tad ee anit a ae - ot ote ea Sins Se ae ip am ara 8 -- Ms ae ee SS aa identi aes = == eal ne hort ct ak ge OR eek oe ee Saaweke Sapo ea patho a ae eS oa a Gnees ~ a A OCA ty SRAM ET Tse SE SE z3 = i : = - 940 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. ine remoyed to Chattanooga and embarked in the practice of his pro- Paceion where he has acquired a good and steadily increasing practice. He continued alone until January 1, 1854, when the present firm of Shepherd & Frazier was formed. Mr. Frazier is a member of the Masonic fraternity, is an able attorney and a first-class citizen in every respect. In 1883 he wedded Miss Lou Keith, who isa native of Athens. Tenn. His father, Thomas M. Frazier, is a native of Greene County. this State. but since 1869 has been a resident of Nashville, where for twelve years he served as judge of the criminal court. The mother of our subject was Margaret M. McReynolds, a native of Bledsoe County, Tenn. Dr. J. M. Fraer, a successful practitioner of Chattanooga, is the son of Peter and Celia (Bennett) Fraer. and the mother in Liverpool, England, and when eight years of age was Havins => The father was born in New York brought to Canada where she and Mr. Fraer were married. lived there about ten years they moved to Lewiston, N. Y., afterward to Niagara Falls and still later to Erie County, Penn., where both died. Of the four children born to He was born January 1, 1846, He received an academic education and a medi- He was a manutacturer and inventor. them only one is now living, our subject. near Dundas, Canada. cal education at the Homeopathic Hospital College of Cleveland, Ohio, at Detroit Homeopathic Medical College and at New York Homeopathic Medical College, graduating at Detroit and taking a post graduate course at New York. He also took private instructions in surgery under Will- iam T. Helmuth. after established himself in Chattanooga. In 1883 he married Miss Julia Williams. profession and has met with evident success asa physician. After practicing until 1872 he came South and soon For fourteen years he has been in the practice of his He passed through the several epidemics, but stood at his post through all. He is a Knight of Pythias and an influential citizen. Walter Scott French, of the Phoenix Foundry Company. Our subject was born in Warren County, near McMinnville, Tenn., May 12, 1854, and is the only son of John H. and L. Virginia (Smith) French of three echil- dren born to them, his sisters being Jessie V. and May L. (Noel) French. His mother, of whom he is very proud, was born in Accomac County, Va., was educated in Washington County, Penn., began her literary career in Memphis, Tenn., and was married to John H. French, his father, in 1853, a native of Virginia and a resident of Tennessee, whose writings are too well known to need comment here. His early life was spent on his father’s farm, where, under the tutorship of his excellent mother ‘and afew local teachers, he received his primary education, and laid the foun-H. WHITESIDE py Ss 2A A law oma Ae D : seek rest, which was much needed. Having regained his health. in October, 1875, he entered Frank Goodman & Company’s Business Col- lege, at Nashville, Tenn., where in February, 1876, he graduated with honors, and in April of the same year entered upon active life, as book- keeper for the manutacturing firm of T. F. Burroughs & C ompany, of his native town, at a nominal salary. Longing for a wider sphere of activity . *. . ; : * " ; and wishing to see more of the world. he decided to sever his connection with the firm, and on December 17, 1877, left for Chattanooga, Tenn., where without means and among strangers he began life anew. Disap- to sickness in January. L874. } pointed in not finding ready employment, though by no means discour- aged, his efforts were at last successful. and on January 8, 1878, he was taken into the employment of Mr. P. CG. Wilson. glass dealer—a business entirely new to him—over many worthy applicants, at $20 per month, which was afterward increased as he became more proficient. As an appreciation of his services, his kind employer allowed him to represent the firm at the great banquet tendered by the citizens of Cincinnati to the merchants of the cities of the South. upon the formal opening of the Cincinnati Southern Railroad, where nearly 2,000 cuests dined at Music Hall on March 18, 1880. In March of the next year he was called home to attend the bedside of his dying mother, where after a long illness she breathed her last on April 1, and was laid to rest. Two weeks alter this event found him again at his business, and in August of the same year, at the earnest solicitations of his first employer, Mr. T. F. Burroughs and his father, he was induced to take a half interest in the firm. On September 7, 1881, he was married to Miss Ella M. Carpenter, a native of Indiana, and a former resident of Cleveland, Ohio. whose parents came to Chattanooga in 1874, and left for McMinnville, his old home, and immediately entered upon his duties in his new sphere. After eighteen months of patient and unceasing labor, and seeing that he was falling behind in meeting his payments, he at once determined to sell his interest, either to his partner or father, and return to Chattanooga. This he did, although he received no financial benefit in the transaction. except to clear himself of a debt of $8,000. The transfer was made to his partner on March 15, 1883, and with a light heart he returned to his adopted city. In July of 1883 he, in conjunction with his wife’s 59— ET aE Sa RE 2a "oe * PRE ee ge RT > oe ee 5 = m EP SL aT = LE aN a PF EO A to IE RIE, TOP ITE ER aoe: ~ ~ ee = ~iecen {i Rj : ; a4 ite ; 4 al J { ine ; nae . ¢ {e } I pal 1 eh ee ae vil Wy a« i Pit tad, ik ripe i Ii || ‘ 4 5 tf ya : | 1 ‘ fhe agi), Peg tregh ty i seat i }} rian { + et ; i ‘ 4 ae nee Ab ; ea adi i ane ay | } i mF i Bi { : Hat ; Hy | y a ' | eal bia at Hehe ta eee a ei il Beaten ih ttn it Di h iBiis| | Peewee i a CER rh ae i hat: ' i ae has i 4 SOE ¢ abe 4 ine aL ee : a i rel 7 F ape ; a wy ; i riel 4 i : t } Fe ae itititdieesieree ta eerie ier ot ce * ta 942 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. father and brother, organized the Phoenix Foundry Company, of which he was made ment and devotion to its affairs brought the company safely through the depressing period of 1884-85. From the investment of $500 in this com- saved up by the severest economy and the frugal habits of his secretary and‘treasurer, and owing to whose good manage- pany, young wife, he is slowly gaining a place of honor among his fellow- Be Aa Two children were born of this marriage—boys. Independent in polities, Presbyterian in his religious faith, a good citizen, energetic, conscientious and courageous, we leave him to bravely fight the battle of life set before him. S J. A. Frazier, of Hill City, Hamilton Co., Tenn., is a native of the eastern division of the State, his birth occurring in Rhea County. in 1840. Graduating at the Hast Tennessee University at eenoravalllka just before the war. he entered the Confederate service, and arose to the rank of captain in the Nineteenth Tennessee Regiment. At Chickamauga he was shot through the windpipe and captured, and con- fned at Johnston’s Island, until the close of the war. In 1870 he was elected attorney-general for the Fourth Judical Cireuit of Tennessee; moved to Hamilton County in 1882, and became one of the earliest set- tlers and chief founders of Hill City. To his marriage with Annie Keith. which was solemnized in 1871, two children have been born, Alleck and Sallie. In the last Democratic convention Mr. Frazier was a prominent candidate for Congress. Charles B. Freeman, justice of the peace, was born in Dalton, Ga., November 25, 1858, and is a son of Judge J. P. Freeman of that place. His early life was spent in various occupations until a railroad accident caused him to be a cripple for life. He then began the study of law under Hon. W. C. Glenn, of Dalton, Ga., and was admitted to the Dal- ton barin 1880. ‘Two years later, he came to Chattanooga, and practiced his profession in that city until January, 1884, when he was elected jus- tice of the peace, at a special election, to fill the vacaney caused by the resignation of G. M. Sherwood. Mr. Freeman is a notary public and commissioner of deeds for New York, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Ken- tucky,. North Carolina, Alabama, Geor8ia and Louisiana. C. R. Gaskill, president of the Chattanooga Iron Fence & Screw Company, secretary of the Chattanooga Street Railroad Company, and assistant cashier of the Third National Bank of this city, is a native of Georgia, and was educated at the capital of that State. In 1872 he came to Chattanooga and commenced reading law. In 1873 he accepted a position in the First National Bank as collector, which position he filled acceptably until 1877. Having in the meantime kept up his study ofHAMILTON COUNTY. 943 the law, he was then admitted to the bar and pursued the practice of the profession until 1881, when he returned to the banking business by accepting the position of book-keeper in the Third National Bank, onl has been connected with that corporation until the present time, having served as assistant cashier since 1883. Mr. Gaskill is a member of the Masonic brotherhood, in which order he attained the rank of Knight Templar. He wedded Sallie Lee, a native of Crawfish Springs, Ga. and by her is the father of one daughter, Annie Lee. He is the son of VY. A. and M. A. (Battle) Gaskill, who were natives of Rutland, Vt., and Georgia, respectively. The father is yet living at his birthplace in New England, but the mother died in 1867. Joseph L. Gaston, M. D., is a son of Mitchel and Jane ( Wilson) Gaston, both natives of East Tennessee. where they were married and have since passed their days. They now reside near Chattanooga, and the father cultivates the soil. Joseph L. was born in McMinn County, Tenn., January 26, 1848, and passed his youthtul days on the farm. He received his literary education at the Grant Memorial University, at Athens, Tenn., from which institution he graduated in 1871. He then taught school and read medicine for two years. He then entered the University Medical College of New York, and craduated there in 1875. He practiced medicine at Harrison, James Co., Tenn.. until 1880. Then on account of failing health he virtually relinquished the practice of medicine and was elected State senator. In 1882 he resigned that office to accept the position of collector of customs at the port of Chattanooga, which position he held until the change of administration in 1885, In January, 1885, he was elected city treasurer for the city of Chattanooga, and served his time—one year—in that capacity. Having by this time regained his health, he again resumed the practice of medicine in Chatta- nooga. He is now, in 1887, city physician and secretary of the Board of United States Pension Examiners. In December, 1878, he married Celestia Lamon, and tothem have been born two children, Fred and Harry. He and Mrs. Gaston are both members of the Methodist Episcopal Church. Andrew J. Gahagan, of Chattanooga, was born in Madison County, N. C., February 23, 1844, son of George W. and Mary E. (West) Gaha- gan, natives respectively of South and North Carolina. Our subject was reared and educated in North Carolina, and at the breaking out of the war enlisted in Company D, First Tennessee Cavalry (United States Volunteers), and during service was promoted to the rank of second and first lieutenant. During the last year of the war he served as quarter- master of his regiment. In 1867 he engaged in mercantile pursuits in ¢ms Si es a Faery Bg ¥ = sai stra ce = ey r nts é eR — = " ae ee a ey a eee Sion a 5 eee —~- ay a ina aida st hana = eget ay eee ee = RS ery Sg ey = Sime or jvwwrini peepee ns ay re ee ett ae etd na tA BI BY yi 4 ah { a ti hi i #1, HH, rh}! raiar a ae oie tS - puaanimaheenet seo nee quark ~ ee ‘ = ccc a ea en, pe oe a on a ee. i sae ena mace ere —s_ _- Sree rs Sat tea : ee : 7 = : oe ~ Lilien it eat - eR a a cn ap RANI a = een - pretest omen rm aren ane ‘RAPHICAL APPENDIX. 944 BIOGRAPHICAL API Chattanooga, but retired from this in 1878 and was elected trustee of Hamilton County, serv ing by re- election two terms or until 1882, when he was elected assistant cashier of the First National Bank. In 1884 he became a member of the firm of Loomis, Hart & Co., haying charge of On the 1st of March, 1871, he married Eliza J. the finances of said firm. them were born three children—two Dugger, of Chattanooga, and to sons and one daughter. Mr. Gahagan is a Republican in politics, and as such was elected to the office of trustee. He served as a member of the board of mayor and aldermen several terms. He isa member of the Masonic fraternity, of the K. T.. of the G. A. R. and of the Methodist Episcopal Chureh North. William Gillaspie, farmer, was born June 27, 1842, in Knox County, Tenn.. and is the second of eight children born to Marcus and Eliza Jane (Simpson ) Gillaspie. Marcus Gillaspie was born in Knox County, +7 1809. and died in 1861. His wife was born May 16, 1818, in Ireland. She came with her parents to America when about nine years of age and settled first in Philadelphia. In 1830 they moved to Clai- borne County. Tenn., and from there to Knox County, in 1833. where Miss Simpson married Marcus Gillaspie. She is still hving and makes her home with her son, William. Both Mr. and Mrs. Gillaspie were members of the Methodist Episcopal Church, from the time they were first married. Our subject received a fair education in the schools of Hamilton County, and assisted his father on the farm until the breaking out of the war, when he enlisted in Capt. White’s company, Fitth Ten- nessee Cavalry, and served three months. His father died, and he was released and returned home. In the fall of 1862 he volunteered again, this time joining Capt. Roger’s company, the Fourth Georgia Cavalry. He was sergeant of his company until the winter of 1865, and the ecom- pany was escort for Gen. Walker during the battles otf Chickamauga and Missionary Ridge. After the war Mr. Gillaspie returned to agri- cultural pursuits, which he has since continued. In January, 1887, he was elected road commissioner of his district. He was married in 1885 to Miss Maggie Castle, a native of Hamilton County, born in 1861, and the daughter of Samuel and Mary (Dody) Castle. Mrs. Gillaspie is a mem- ber of the Catholic Church, and Mr. Gillaspie of the Methodist Episcopal Church. He commenced life a poor man and is now in very comfortable circumstances. Heowns 190 acres of excellent land located on the Bird’s Mill road, four and.a half miles east of Chattanooga. Mr. Jacob Gillaspie, grandfather of the subject of this sketch, was a soldier in the struggle for independence. He resided in North Carolina pre- vious to the Revolution, but after that event he moved to Knox County,HAMILTON COUNTY. 945 LTenn., settling first in a fort near where Campbell’s Station now is. He was of Irish descent. David Giles, president of the Chattanooga Foundry and Pipe Works, was born in Pittsburgh, Penn., February 27,1836, son of Thomas and Mary (Evans) Giles, natives of Wales. David Giles was reared to manhood in his native State and in Ohio. He learned the iron business in Penn- sylvania, being a practical molder by trade. In 1857 he came South and accepted a position as foreman ofa foundry at Nashville, where he con- tinued until 1866, when he established a foundry in that city and con- ducted it successfully for one year, when Mr. ©. B. Isbester became a partner, and these gentlemen, in 1877, moved the foundry to Chattanooga. Mr. Giles has been president of the present stock company since its organization as a stock company in July, 1882. He is a Republican in politics, a Knight of Honor, and is recognized’as a reliable and enterpris- ing business man and citizen. tev. Patrick J. Gleeson, pastor of the Roman Catholic Church of SS. Peter and Paul, was born in Ireland in April, 1846. Having received a thorough classical and English education in his native country, he came to America in the fall of 1868. He taught the catholic school of Knox- ville, Tenn., soon after his arrival in the country to the close of the school year. In September, 1569, he resumed his studies for the priesthood, entering Mount St. Mary’s Seminary of the West, Cincinnati, Ohio, Here he continued the usual course of study of philosophy and theology, and received minor orders, sub-deaconship and deaconship from the Most Rev. John Baptist Purcell, archbishop of Cincinnati, on the Ember Days, in December, 1872. He was ordained priest on January 23, 1873, in the cathedral of Nashville, Tenn., by Most Rev. P. A. Feehan, the bishop of Nashville, now archbishop of Chicago. A week later he was sent on his first mission to Clarksville, Tenn. He labored in Montgomery and adjoining counties until transferred to his present charge, arriving in Chattanooga July 18, 1555. J.C. Guild, inspector of mines for Tennessee, and member of the firm of Dickerson & Guild, civil] and mining engineers and analytical chemists, 1s a native of Sumner County, Tenn. He was reared and educated in Nashville, and graduated from Vanderbilt University in 1883. He was in the serv- ice of the State as assistant geologist, during which time he collected all the minerals sent to the Southern exposition at Louisville, and also arranged the mineral cabinet for the State at Nashville and assisted in collecting the specimens for the same. As inspector of mines he makes semi-annual reports to the State commissioner of agricultural statistics, etc., besides many private reports of individual mines. He locateda eee aera eres ee Ty IE get yy teehee ae mers ang ae pp ae Spree cag rman tee anne seers wenn < 2d oe > 5 TT MRR RI San 7 en ae ee a (So aa a) eee : 4 reine pb TS ES nee, eee ae othe oa Sere FI —— 946 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. in Chattanooga in 1886, and October of the same year married Miss Mary Oriya native of Nashville. Mr. Guild is a member of the Greek Society, “Beta Theta Pi.” He is also grandson of Jo. C. Guild, author of “Old Times in Tennessee.” His father, George B. Guild, an able attorney at Nashville, is a native of Nashville, and was a member of the Legisla- ture in 1872, wasalso formerly county court clerk of Sumner County. The mother’s maiden name was Georgie Thompson. ‘The parents are both living, and our subject, two brothers and one sister are the surviving members of a family of five children. Green & Walker, hardware merchants of Chattanooga, established their business August 1, 1886, at their present quarters, 828 Market Street. They carry a large and well selected stock of general hardware and mecha- nie’s tools, and control a large share of the tradein city and county. The individual members are William T. Green and Frank M. Walker. Mr. Green was born in Knox County, Tenn., in 1849, and is a son of the late Augustus P. Green of this city, who died in this county in 1878. William Green was reared andeducated in Hamilton County. In 1874 he engagedin mercantile pursuits near Memphis, Tenn.; in 1880 returned to Chat- tanooga, and for four years has been engaged in the hardware business. He has been quite successful in this occupation. He is a Democrat, a Mason, and is one of Chattanooga’s reliable business men. Frank M. Walker (other member of the firm), was born in Rogersville, Hawkins Co., Tenn., April 3, 1863, and is the son of the late Gen. Frank M. Walker who was killed during the late war. Frank M. Walker, Jr., was educated in Rogersville, and in 1880 came,to Chattanooga, where he learned the hardware business with J. H. Warner & Co. In 1886 he engaged in his present business with Mr. Green. June 2, 1886, he married Miss Maggie Whitman, of Georgia. Mr. Walker is a Democrat in politics, and is a wide-awake thorough-going business man. D. R. Griffiths, merchant and farmer at Sale Creek. was born in South Wales, November 20, 1834, and came to America in 1864. He first settled in Steubenville, Ohio, but in a short time removed to Shamokin, Penn., and from there to Hubbard, Ohio, in October of the same year. In March, 1868, he came to Sale Creek, where he has since resided. Previous to this, in 1866, he, with nineteen others. then living in Ohio, organized a company to come to East Tennessee and lease some coal mines. They opened up the mines in the same year, and continued very successfully, considering the poor market they had, until 1880, when the company sold out to the present owners. Mr. Griffiths began working in the mines at the early age of seyen, and continued this up to 1880. He then opened a store at Sale Creek. and has eneased in this business, 1n StsHAMILTON COUNTY. 947 connection with farming, up to the present. He also deals very exten- sively in tan-bark; and in 1883 they handled $16,000 worth of the same, averaging per year about $5,000. What education Mr. Griffiths has was picked up by the family fireside. He began working for himself at the age of seventeen, and has accumulated considerable property by his own exertions. In 1854 he married Miss Ruth Richards, who was born in January, 1836, and who is the daughter of William and Margaret Richards, of Aberdare, South Wales. To our subject and wife ten chil: dren were born, of whom four boysand two girls are now living: William, David, Thomas, Richard, Annie (Mrs. Reese), and Ruth (Mrs. Thomp- son). Mr. Griffiths is a Republican in politics, and he and wife are members of the Union Church at Sale Creek, although reared Baptists. John A. Hart, of the well known furniture and lumber firm of Loomis, Hart & Co., was born in Greenville, Ohio, on the lst of March, 1845. He received his early education in the schools of his native town, finishing his schooling at college in Delaware, Ohio. During the early part of the war he espoused the Union cause, and enlisting from school served until the close of the civil war as a private. The war over he settled in Ala- bama and engaged in the lumber business, but later settled permanently in Chattanooga. He here has indentified himself closely with the business prosperity of the city, and in 1879 and 1880 served creditably in the capacity of mayor. January 13, 1885, he was elected president of the Third National Bank, a position he yet retains. He is the present pres- ident of the Chattanooga Stove Works which he organized, also vice- president of the Mountain City Fire Insurance, and besides is a stock- holder in many of the most important and successful manufacturing enterprises for,which Chattanooga isnoted. As a business man Mr. Hart has been very successful, and he is recognized as one of the most enter- prising men of Hamilton County. James N. Hazlehurst, president and manager of the Lookout Iron Company, was born in Hancock County, Ga., January 15, 1864. He was reared in his native State and finished his education at Sewanee Uni- versity, Tenn., in 1883. His parents, George H. and Irene W. (Nisbet) Hazlehurst, natives of Georgia, had in the meantime removed to Chattanooga. Our subject was in the Western States and Territories from 1878 to 1881 as civil engineer on the Texas Pacific, New Orleans & Pacific. and Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railways. Upon the organization of the Lookout Iron Company, in 1885, he became its vice- president, and one year later its president. He has officiated in the latter capacity in a faithful and highly efficient manner up to the present time. Mr. Hazlehurst is also a partner in the mercantile business ofEPL TRS SE RSE TL nS — = Sets PTI en lS lage Rate or a a at ne cE he Ra _ Me Rant ae 7 RTE 3p TE npn TRANG AER ESIR Se a hE Ee Hila as eee” St ana mo nae ee en ere erat mip im ime me om basinal ‘ nai sae ee acl orga pe ana ta J sia ‘ mee et . ’ ; : a ica Xreecaechtetae anata a = a eB he nN Nr a Son enaaerneeS aetCe e ene Cee ae 7 ~ = — fitter, Sok: eget cai Sonoma ch nn ls agunicaghiiemeaie wns : sn em tenn Ciyaet ns 948 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. A. B. Wingfield & Co., of this city. October 6, 1886, he married Miss Mary E., daughter of John C. Griffis, of Chattanooga. ae F. Hamill, farmer, of the Second District, was born February 29 1828, in Blount County, Tenn., and is the seventh of nine children born Hamill. The father was and Hamilton He was elected justice of the peace in 1836, 7 to the union of Samuel and Catherine ( Best) born in Blount County, Tenn., about 1789, came to County February 14, 1832. and held this office until his death in May, 1856, with the exception of a few months, caused by his removal from the Second to the Fifth District, He was a very devoted and active member of the Old Line Presbyterian Church, and was one of the founders of the same at the Baker Creek Meeting House. and died in 1840. ingly early day. Our subject attended school but nine months in his life, The mother was born in Buncombe County, N. C:. Her parents came to Blount County in an exceed- but his father was a school-teacher, was well educated. and kept his house- hold bountifully supplied with papers, magazines and the best books circulating at that day, which afforded our subject an excellent oppor- tuuity to store his mind with the general news of the day and with his- torical facts. J. F. Hamill, in 1852, was elected justice of the peace and served until 1858. He was then elected coroner of the county and served until 1860. He also farmed. and ran a ferry boat at Chattanooga until the breaking out of the war. He was then captured as a political prisoner and carried first to Knoxville, then to Nashville. then to Tusea- where he was In July, 1863, he returned home, and until December of the same year worked as a hired hand. loosa, then to Mobile, and from there to Macon, Ga.. released. He then made his escape, to avoid the Conscript Act, went to Lexington. Kye: struck the Federal fot where ne Army, going the entire distance on foot. After the war he returned to Chattanooga, where he was made first sergeant of police and served in 7 { this capacity twelve months. In the spring of 1868 he was elected reg- jm! » ster of the county, and served about six years. In 1874 he moved to - he farm where he has since resided. 1852, he married Miss Ford, Samuel (deceased). Lizzie (Mrs. Williams). James Buchanan, Mollie J. (deceased). John (deceased) and Catherine. Mrs. Hamill died in February, 1864, at Nashville. and on May 19, 1868, Mr. Hamill married Mrs. Mary Smith, tormerly Miss Kirklen, and to this union four children were born: Mollie John, Daniel, Samuel and John. + —) Previous to the war, in February, Rachel who bore him seven children: Benjamin, Mrs. Hamill is a member of the Methodist Kpiscopal Church South, but Mr. Hamill is not a member of any church, but is a Quaker in principle. He was a W hig before the war, but since that event hasHAMILTON COUNTY. 949 voted the Republican ticket. His first presidential vote was cast for Z. Taylor. His grandfather, David Hamill, came from Belfast, Ireland, to Pennsylvania. His wife also came from Ireland and settled in the same locality, where, after the Revolutionary war, they were married. They immigrated to Blount County some time before 1800. and our sub- ject’s father was born in a stockade. J. F.’s maternal erandfather, Daniel Best, came from Holland to America and settled in Buncombe County, N. C., but afterward immigrated to Tennessee. G. M. D. Heard, crockery merchant at Chattanooga, Tenn., was born July 21, 1844, in Cleveland, Ohio.. He is the eighth of ten children born to Charles W. and Caroline (Goldsmith) Heard. - Mrs. (Goldsmith ) Heard was a daughter of Mrs. Abigail (Jones) Goldsmith, of Painesville: Ohio, where the latter now lives, and was one hundred years old the 29th of April, 1887. She is a native of Berkshire Hills, Mass.. and came from there to the city where she now resides, early in this century. Mr. Charles W. Heard was born in Onondaga County, N. Y. in 1806, and came to Ohio at quite an early day. He was a prominent architect of Cleveland, Ohio, where he builtsome of the oldest houses and superintended the building of some of the most prominent public buildings now standing. He was a consistent Democrat, maintaining his opinions against bitter opposition and prejudice which existed in that section during the late war. He was of Scoteh descent. Mrs. Heard wasa descendant of the famous Oliver Goldsmith family. Our subject secured a fair education in the schools of Cleveland, Ohio, and ran away from them and entered the army in 1862. He enlisted in Company H, Kighty-fourth Ohio Vol- unteer Infantry. He came to Chattanooga in 1870, where he has since resided, engaged in his present business, the style of the firm being Brooks & Heard, 122 Market Street, Chattanooga. He was elected and served as school commissioner of Chattanooga one term. He married Miss Lillie Tutt in 1875. She was born in Chattanooga, Tenn., in 1857, is the daughter of Benjamin F. and Lizzie (Rawlings) Tutt, and a descendant of the Tutt family of Augusta, Ga. Four children were the result of our subject’s marriage: Clio, Rawlings Walton, Charles Wallace and Lois Goldsmith. Mr. Heard is a Republican in polities, and he and wife are members of St. Paul’s Protestant Episcopal Church at Chattanooga, of which Mr. Heard is a vestryman. He pur- > chased, in 1884, Beauclair, at the head of Whiteside Street in St. Elmo, the most beautiful natural location for a residence in the county. Caspar H. Hensel, manager tor the John Kauffman Brewing Com- pany (Cincinnati) at Chattanooga, and principal owner of the Chatta- nooga Ice & Bottling Company, 1s a native of Prussia, Germany, borneetiiiomagel eee atten emir eatin ae = SIRI Senne a, Te a, Eateries gare = na oe ~ i - ait aa weet “ a abs b=sceten - a ‘ eer = . “ ~~ ~ - » - _ . ee * im ae oo — es = ~ an a ae — ‘ moe wate = ——— — = " fe a norte cos = ~ : an io rape neni ime intientiaaineien a . ni - gat a ace a a = a = te = ne as peep Sa ca De acai “ . 2 é Bilis) Tin ae le = . ee oe a - a on = Se ee aint Caen eatoes Aeon Feat tanen toes : ; . E “ ie oe -- - =o i Sa a ae ert oa “ = WS ee =n Seether i — aterm enna < en are - - a ee ees eter mee " : Siw es ig: see seis ed = ars 2g agli ia eisai i ee ‘ aS woe Ie a ees ey rs = te re - 8 —o— aes x = . Pent F ‘ ¢ if BPR th) EER Bh Pt Mal: Ha ie He Pe Ry Maal qi pea cea Lie | I sere ere a Re - 4 | ae ‘ see APH 950 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. January 23, 1846. He came to the United States in 1865, and located at Cincinnati, where he engaged in mercantile pursuits. In1883 he entered the employ of the John Kauffman Brewing Company, and in August, 1885, ‘ame to Chattanooga as their representative. In November, 1885. he es- tablished the Chattanooga Ice & Bottling Company, with Mr. A. R. Blair. Since November, 1886, he hasbeen principal owner and manager of the same, bottling ale, beer, carbonated waters, ginger ale, ete. The busi- ness amounts to from $25,000 to $30,000 per annum. He also does an equally large business in ice, being simply dealers in manufactured ice. In June, 1876, Mr. Hensel married Amelia Schuein, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and they have two living children by this union, both daughters. Mr. Henselisa Democrat in politics, a K. of H. ( Cincinnati Lodge), and a mem- ber of the German Lutheran Church. Jesse T. Hill, of Chattanooga, was born in Nashville, Tenn., March 18, 1850, and is a son of Robert T. and Catherine (Stout) Hill, natives of Nashville, where our subject was reared aud educated. In 1868 he came to Chattanooga and entered the employ of the Southern Express Company, where he remained four years. Hewas then deputy clerkand master of chancery court about ten years, after which he became secre- tary of the Etna Coal Company. In September, 1885, he engaged in the marble business:as a member of the firm of Daly, Smith & Hill. Mr. Hill has been director of the Third National Bank, of Chattanooga since its organization, and is also director of Citico Furnace Company. He is president of the Tennessee Marble & Railroad Company, with head- quarters here, and quarry in Monroe County, Tenn., March 16, 1878, he was united in marriage to Miss Alice B. Woodward, a native of Ohio. and to them were born three daughters. Mr. Hill is a Democrat, and was mayor of Chattanooga during the years 1878-79. He is a Mason, was a member of the Chattanooga school board four years, and himself and family are Episcopalians. His partner, Patrick C. Daly, was born in Ireland in 1836, and came tothe United Statesin 1849. where he learned the marble cutter’s trade in New York City. He worked at the same in Northern cities until 1872, when he came to Chattanooga in April of that year and engaged in the marble business. He is a Royal Arch Mason. J. W. Hoagland, M. D., is a son of E. M. and Cynthia (Smith) Hoagland. The father was born in Ohio and the mother in West- moreland County, Va., being of the same family as the famous John Smith, of Virginia. When a girl she moved to Ohio, where she and Mr. Hoagland were married. After moving to Indiana the mother died,’ and the father afterward returned to Ohio and married Mrs. MariahHAMILTON COUNTY. 951 State. He was a farmer by occupation, and became the father of nine children by his first marriage. Our subject was born in Richland County, Ohio, July 16, 1845, and received a good common school educa- tion. At the age of fourteen, he began the carpenter’s trade. He taught school for some time, by which calling he made enough to take him to college and to Worcester University. During the last year of the war, he served in the Federal Army, after which he took a medical course at the Columbus Medical College, from which he graduated in 1876, and has practiced continuously ever since. In 1885 he came to Chattanooga. Previous to this, in 1888, he married Amelia Wiggins, a native of Noble County, Ind., and a daughter of Rey. Charles F. Wiggins. i} Rev. W. W. Hooper, A. M., professor of natural science in Chat- tanooga University, was born in Licking County, Ohio, October 18, 1843. His father, Jacob Hooper, was born in Maryland, and his mother, Mary (Watson) Hooper, was a native of Virginia. In early life both went to Ohio, where they were married and became the parents of six children— two sons and four daughters. In 1852 the mother died, and afterward Jacob Hooper married Elizabeth Lewis, who bore him two sons and one daughter. Both Mr. and Mrs. Hooper are now living in California. In early life the father was a farmer, but afterward followed mechanical pursuits. In 1861, our subject entered the Ohio Wesleyan University, but the stirring events of the war caused him to throw aside his books and volunteer, in 1862, in Company A of a battalion of United States Infantry, and participated in the deadly conflict at Shiloh and Murfrees- boro. Having served eighteen months he was taken sick, and after recovery was detailed in the United States medical department at Louisville, Ky. After the war he spent some time in the Central Ohio Normal and in the Illinois State Normal, after which he taught school and went to college by turns. In 1872, he graduated from the university, and three years later received his degree of A. M. After conducting the high school at Buckley, Ill, a short time, he was elected vice- president of Rust University at Holly Springs, Miss., and three years later became president of the same, which position he held ten years. In 1886 he took his present position. In connection with his profession, he has been working in the ministerial field. In 1874, he married Miss Mattie Green, a native of Ohio, and a graduate of the Ohio Wesleyan Female College. To them were born two children: Frank and Mabel. The Professor is a Mason, and his wife is also a member of the Methodist Episcopal Church. Be ice William T. Hope, M. D., was born December 26, 1850, in Roane County, Tenn. He graduated from the literary depart-tele heen TD Gores - » he he apa tm oe ny >. thal PN TENOR NAT a PR TERI RETR SS Sas oo eee ee eee eee O52, BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. ment of Cumberland University in 1870. under, DOr bb Benois, ne for two years, lectures at the University of Virginia, and graduated College, New York, in 1873. Hospital Medical took Having read medicine a course of from Bellevue After practicing two years in his home county, he came to Chattanooga, where he has remained ever since. He has been city physician, president of the board of health, and is a member of the Chattanooga Medical Society, State Medical Society, the American Medical Association and the American Public Health Association. For many years a member of the Masonic fraternity, he was clected Eminent Commander of Lookout Commandery Ol he Weim Soe Mecllroy. a native of Pike County, Mo. berland Presbyterian Church. In November, 1886, he was married to Miss Lizzie I. Both are members of the Cum- His parents, W. B. and Mary A. (Foute) Hope, were both natives of Roane County, Tenn. - They had three children of whom W. T. and M. M. Hope are Now has generally followed farming and merchandising, the days of militia, and an enrolling officer during the late war. living. The father Was a major during The mother died about 1855, and W. B. Hope was again married in 1862, to Mrs. Kate Weleker Robinson. union of whom seven are now living. Nine children have been the result of this H. D. Huffaker. county superintendent of public instruction in Ham- ilton County. born November « Was LS, 1860, in Hamilton, now James. County, Tenn., and is the eldest of a family of nine children born to « Jesse I’. and Sarah ( Holland) Huffaker. The father was born in Alabama in 1838, and came to Hamilton County, Tenn.. when but twelve vears of 10° AQ ¢ . In 1861 he enlisted in Company I, East Tennessee Cavalry, and was sergeant of his company. At the termination of the war he received his discharge at Knoxville. He is an ordained minister of the gospel in the Missionary Baptist Church, and has charge of three churches at the present time. the daughter of Rey. H. P. Holland (deceased ). He is of Dutch-Ivish extraction as is also his wife, who was born in Monroe County in 1841, and died March 12. 1882. She was Mr. Holland was a prominent citizen of Hamilton, now James, County, and was also of Dutch- Irish lineage. Our subject received his education at Sumach College in Murray County, Ga., and at Coosawattee Seminary. Gordon County, Ga. He is a graduate of Behm’s Commercial College at Chattanooga, and since then has been engaged in teaching and bookke eping. January 4, 1887, he was elected superintendent of the county schools. He has made teaching a success, and his salary was increased each successive term taught. He is one of five in Hamilton County who hold five vear certif- leates, and he is also president of the Hamilton County Teachers’ Insti-HAMILTON COUNTY. 953 tute. December 29, 1885, he married Miss Addie Varnell. of Tyner, Tenn. She was born September 29, 1864, in Hamilton County, and is the daughter of G. W. and Lizzie (Hughes ) Varnell. Mr. Varnell was born September 15, 1829... He served during the late war as first lieu- tenant in Company F’. At the termination of the war he received his discharge at Nashville. He is of Dutch-Ivish extraction, as is also his wife, who was born December 23, 1842 and died February 1, 1878. She was the daughter of William. Hughes (deceased). Mr. Hughes was born October 6, 1806, and served as captain in Company F. He was a prominent citizen of Hamilton County until his death, February, 7, 1878. Our subject and his wife are members of the Missionary Baptist Church, which he served as secretary at his former home in north Georgia. He is a Democrat in politics and a strong Prohibitionist. He is a very promising young man. He is at present principal of the Daisy Academy, but intends at the end of this term to give up school teaching and devote his entire time to the duties of his office. Mrs. Huffaker is his assistant teacher in the academy. David W. Hughes, former proprietor of the planing and saw mill and also former lumber dealer at Chattanooga, was born in South Wales, September 17, 1557, came to the United States in 1866 and to Chatta- nooga in 1867. He entered the lumber business here as employe for other firms. In 1878 he engaged in the business for himself in partner- ship with Childs & Co., and in 1880 the frm became Hughes & Marquet. In 1883 My. Hughes became sole proprietor of the business. The pres- ent works were built in 1875 and the dimensions of the planing mill are 80x120 feet, is two stories high, with one shed 20x200 feet and another 30x200 feet. The saw millis 70x120 and the planing mill, grounds and buildings cover an entire block between Cowart and Whiteside. Louisa and Catherine Streets saw mill is on the Tennessee River, adjoining Roane Iron Works. Thesaw mill and lumber yard cover sixteen acres of sround. The entire businessemploys about 200 men when in operation. Mr. Hughes is president of the Brush Electric Light Company, and has a branch lumber business in Knoxville, Birmingham and in Atlanta, Ga. March 1, 1887, he sold out to the Hughes Lumber Company, an incorpo- rated company who succeeded him in the business. He was elected pres- ident and manager of the company. Mr. Hughes is independent in politics, a K. T., a Mason, a K. of P., Royal Arcanum, and a successful business man. | se Caleb B. Isbester, vice-president of the Chattanooga Foundry and Pipe Works, was born in Scotland December 31, 1828, and is a son of Caleb and Elizabeth (Newton) Isbester, both natives of Scotland. Our subjecti etelbgeinetpmas uit aa a ae ee - 8 A a mr iam 2 soap San ie at al Sitesi neem. a si a aE a bi sat SUE. Oe ae a 3 = sr com - " Fk F ’ = = wii bese uta 1k ASU = Sertich hon — rete eee er me ee Pe eae tems.) ee bE ae ee Sons aera : & = = ae = aS ag = ‘ om tram A wrk SS Sn SRDS a SONG TRO — ae , eg rae ese, So = ese a a a A anh a hin Rm ee ie coor erento ? es ee ae a eT ° abe -- nm ee a Soa ag Tae. nang tan uanantaeen O54 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. Vics C ~ 2 £26 rac PpaAaara 7 Dz : CY , Ai : zame tothe United States in 1832, was reared in Pittsburgh and Allegheny He business with City, Penn., where he learned the pattern maker’s trade (iron business ). same South in 1852, and in 1868 engaged in the foundry Mr. Giles, after which, in 1877, He has been vice-president since the organization of the present stock they moved the foundry to Chattanooga. He was united in marriage to Miss Virginia Thornton of Mr. Company. Tennessee, and tothem were born two children—ason and daughter. Isbester is a Republican in politics, and an excellent citizen. J. J. Jackson, farmer and stock raiser inthe Second District, was born September 10, 1834, in Hamilton County, a log schoolhouse with no about it and a and received his education in dirt floor, After > he married Miss Rebecca i Voile Preston and Mary (Laymen) Gann, who were among the earliest settlers of Hamilton County. Mrs. Trish descent, and the latter of German. by the birth of eight children, ‘“ chinking ”’ assisting his father on the farm until of : Gann in 1855. She was born December and is a daughter of Mr. Gann was born in Hawkins County, Tenn., and The of Scotch- Our subject’s union was blessed Martha A. Gann in Washington County, Tenn. former was four of whom are still living: (deceased), James la Fayette, Ardelia (deceased). Sophronia (Mrs. James A. Hunter), Rufus (deceased), Mary Ann (deceased), Tennessee and Willie. Mr. Jackson enlisted in the Federal Army, Company A, Sixth Tennessee Mounted Infantry, but previous to this he was captured He was mustered In polities Mr. Jackson is an ardent Republican, but before the war was a Democrat. Although not members of the church yet Mr, and Mrs. Jackson are lib- eral in their support of all church and educational enterprises. several times and made his escape each different time. out of service at Nashville, Tenn., at the close of the war. They have given each of their children a good education, and one son, J. L., isnow a practicing physician and surgeon in Chattanooga. He received his liter- ary education at Athens Univer sity, and his medical education at the Old School Medical College at Cincinnati, Ohio, completing his course at the latter institution in two years. He is a very successful practitioner, Our subject was the eldest of eight children born to Jonathan and Nancy especially so in surgery. ( Rodgers) Jackson. The father was born in North Carolina about 180 9. and moved to Marion County with his par- entsabout1812. In 1822, ornear that time, he moved to Hamilton C ounty and settled near Hixon Station. He wasa successful farmer anda highly He died in 1876. The mother was bornin West Ten- nessee, and came with her parents to Hamilton C ounty about 1820. She died in 1880, on the day of the November election. Mr. Jonathan Jackson was of Welsh and his wife of Irish descent. respected citizen. They were highly respectedHAMILTON COUNTY. 955 people, and were active members ofthe Methodist Episcopal Church South. Our subject’s grandfather, Ephraim Jackson, was a soldier in the Revolu- tionary war. Charles EK. James, whose name figures largely and prominently in the business interests of Chattanooga, is a native of East Tennessee, born at Blountville, near the Virginia State line, December 12. 1851. When but five years of age his parents removed to Chattanooga, and he was here reared and educated. In 1870 he embarked actively in business pursuits in the iron brokerage business, at which he continued until the year 1877, when he removed to the city of Montgomery, Ala., there assisting in the construction of the water works of that place. The year following he returned to Chattanooga, and established his present exten- sive business in iron and railway supplies, which is mentioned more fully in the history of the present business interests of Chattanooga in another part of this volume. He assisted in the organization of the Chattanooga Gas Light Company, of which he was the efficient superintendent five years. He was also one of the principal movers in the establishment of the Union Railway Company, of Chattanooga, of which he is now presi- dent. Mr. James is a Democrat in politics; is a Knight Templar in Masonry, and is the father of one son by his marriage with Miss Kate R. Webster, to whom he was wedded in November, 1876. He is the son of Jesse J. and Sarah M. ( Vincent) James. M. L. Jenkins, superintendent of the Soddy Coal Mines, was born in December, 1842, and is one of twelve children born to John and Ann (Lewis) Jenkins. The parents were both inhabitants of Wales. The father is still living, and is eighty years old. The mother died about 1855, while still quite young. Our subject received his education in the subscription schools of Wales. He began mining as a day laborer at the age of twelve, and by his own energy and ability has arisen to his pres- ent position. He came to America in 1868, and located first in Pennsyl- vania, where he remained three years, and then went to Mahanoy City. In 1872 he came to Soddy, where he has since remained. He married Miss Elenor Lloyd in Wales. She is the daughter of Evan and Cather- ine Lloyd. Mrs. Jenkins was born about 1500, and by her marriage became the mother of six children: Evan (deceased), Hester, Catherine, Maggie (deceased), Abram and John. Mr. and Mrs. Jenkins are mem- bers of the Congregational Church. Mr. Jenkins is a Republican in politics, a Master Mason, a K. of H. and a member of the. I. O. O. F. H. A. Johnson, manager and only resident member of the firm of Taylor, Crote & Johnson, saw mill men and lumber dealers, is a native of Buffalo, N. Y., where he grew to manhood, and where he was engagedie: LT ay SE a TE, a .7 REET eee : I Ne TE ETS I Ag Le eee rime eS i. : ———S oy = on gi tae a ip rn mri — - eng eee oe TS TREE ate ae i Hi HH 1 it 1) We EE | oe Hat } . i eee ige ge anes ones etl, a ap ee See ET Ne Se et emai iy Ca oe ries epee li 4 7 eh aliapse Paras et ne Me geet ee a YF ne loa ee aa 956 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. in the lumber business until he came to Chattanooga in 1881. He was then engaged in buying and shipping walnut lumber, until 1854, at which date he located permanently here. In 1872 he was united in mar- riage to Miss Rosa Wright, a native of Fredonia, N. Y., to whom one child, a daughter, has been born. Our subject’s parents, Amasa and Delpha (Smead) Johnson were natives of Vermont. The mother ced in 1865, and the father is now a resident of Michigan. The mill owned and operated by Taylor, Crote & Johnson was built in 1881 by Treice & Gillmore, which firm was succeeded by Woodward & Winchester in 1883, and by Treice & Johnson until the present firm was formed in the fall of 18 About forty hands are employed by this firm, and they saw 4,000,000 feet annually. Hon. Dt M. Key, judge of the United States District Court for the eastern and middle aimieione of ‘Tennessee, is a native of Greene County, this State, his birth occurring January 27, 1824. He is a son of Rey. John and Margaret ( Armitage) Key who were also natives of Greene County, their respective deaths occurring in Monroe County, Tenn., in 1854 and 1882. The father was a minister in the Methodist Episcopal Church. In the year 1826 the family removed to Monroe County where David M. was reared and educated, having graduated from Hiwassee College in 1850. He selected the legal profession as his voca- tion through life, and the same year of his graduation was admitted to the bar. For two years he practiced law at Madisonville, then a short time at Kingston, and in February, 1853, came to Chattanooga, which has ever since been his home. Until the commencement of the war he practiced his profession in the firm of Welcker & Key, then enlisting in the Forty-third Confederate Tennessee Regiment of Infantry, served until the close of the war, and was mustered out as lieutenant-colonel. He then resumed the practice of law in the firm of Welcker & Key until 1565, then in the firm of Key, Hakin & Key. He was a member of the constitutional convention of 1870, and in August of the same year was elected chancellor of the Chattanooga division. This position he resigned in 1875, to acce pt the appointment of United States Senator tendered him by Gov. Porter. In March. 1877. he was appointed Postmaster- General by President Hayes, and filled the office until August 25, 1880, when he accepted his present position. In 1857 Mr. Key oe Eliza- beth Lenoir, a native Ch attanoogan, and to their union nine children have been born. eight of whom are yet living. Thomas S. King, see retary and treasurer of the Vehicle e Spring Com- pany, is a native of Wales, and came to the United States in infancy. His parents, Thomas and Mary ( Morgan) King, located in Illinois in 1848,HAMILTON COUNTY. 957 where our subject was reared and educated at McKendree College, Lebanon, Ill. At the time of the breaking out of hostilities between the North and South our subject enlisted in the One Hundred and Fiftieth Illinois Infantry and served until the close of the war. He then returned to Illinois, but at the end of one year moved to Georgia and engaged in the mercantile business for a short time. He was then engaged in the rail- way mail service of the United States until he accepted his present posi- tion in December, 1884. The Vehicle Spring Company was organized in the year 1884, and has $5,000 invested. He is a member of the Masonic fraternity and the G. A. R. Mr. King’s parents were natives of England and Wales respectively. The father was a local] preacher of the Methodist Episcopal Church for more than thirty years before his death; died August 30, 1886. The mother is still living. Elisha Kirklen, merchant at St. Elmo. was born March 9, 1832, in Bledsoe County, and is one of ten children born to Elisha and Susan (Hixon) Kirklen. The father was born in North Carolina in 1802, and came to Bledsoe County ata very early date. He served as justice of the peace for many years, and was a very successful farmer and merchant. He was of English descent and died in 1866. The mother was born in Bledsoe County in 1804. She was an active Christian worker, and died December 17, 1886. She was of German descent. Our subject received a fair education in the common schools of Bledsoe County. He assisted his father on the farm, and in 1852 married Miss Naney Stockton. She was born December 18. 18338, and was the daughter of William and Charlotta (Reckter) Stockton. Nine children are the result of our sub- ject’s marriage: Mary S. (Mrs. Ashley), Martha J. (Mrs. Shultz), Laura L. (Mrs. Adams), Abraham, Lizzie (Mrs. Jackson), William. Elisha, Joseph and George. Mrs. Kirklen is a member of the Methodist Epis- copal Church South. Our subject farmed in the Second District until 1884, when he moved to St. Elmo and engaged in nerchandising. He has a fine farm of 800 acres in the Second District, also four and a half acres in St. Elmo. Mr. Kirklen is a Democrat in polities, and was post- master at Hamilton postoffice for several years. Rey. E. 8. Lewis, A. M., acting president of Chattanooga University, was born in Natick, Mass, August 24 1855. His father, Rev. Joseph W. Lewis, was a Methodist Episcopal minister of Mas- sachusetts for many years, of which State he was a _ native. His mother, Miss Marcas K. Hoar, was a member of one of the most prominent families of the State. Their family consisted of uhree children—two sons and one daughter. Our subject was the eldest child, and while growing up received his education in the public and high 60+ , te Fee enema ths eye outepnan E an aap cee ee eretn e a penne net ome enenee ee ete - ER ERE ey 3 . Se > = — eras i = = ~ pe staal mee ae ~e etal ~~ as = ai - = citi a as ' : : : — : " Sea ars we ° e eae = icici Tis a 2 ¥ < =x Sioa Beietnar oo <3 - = OES, am ia : ae _— pore 3 a ee SE ag Sethe. aes ce ane a ne tins I ee stieeenen i aE ere % % nian ek . = ~ iat -cams, com m &. aes = 7 Re ore x . ae = : en . - PERE eal. ae 7 - RUNS EE PEAR UOR TN alesis Poses Serge — eas ay . ito Seat S Se 3 oa a enn ee ee 52 anita See ; - = ae er = nae = . ee ‘ Sonny ance ee 4 pent recmis ‘“ a a a a 3 i : “ - > mano ~~~ a Le tegemmmpemcromeg oe ee " - moe my Meio Acme a < 4 aoe . ~— ce r ie Pres . : 2 , SNS. essere seer ae fas soe, nae Enna ease ee — oa ante 5 4s Bs es = 7 : eee ae : ares ae : ~ oT : es Y ‘ Sore a Ke = = x * Nine reps heap ae att eto = MSIE, ‘ oe, Scary ae oo BT anialsoegie < sree lpi ) ater tors See ==

tie ee es ere: . : : = eee — ead ues etl ey eae ee Paine - i . oe caret scat eee ea ie : SS 958 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. schools of his native State. He prepared, by private instruction, for Boston University, and craduated in 1877 from the College of Liberal Arts, and four years later also graduated from the school of all science of the ame university. He was professor of natural science in the Cin- cinnati Wesleyan College, has held the position of president of Little Rock University, and accepted his present position in 1886. In 1879 he married Miss Anna C. Sparks of Hamilton County, Ohio, who bore him two children, only one now living, Edward R. He and wife are both members and active workers in the Methodist Episcopal Church. John E. Lloyd, is a native ot Wales.and came to America in the spring of 1860. Hespent the first two years, after landing in this coun- try, in traveling quite extensively throughout the United States, prospect- ing for a company of mining capitalists at Philadelphia. He then set- tled at Dupont, Penn., as superintendent of mines belonging to Geo. Dupont & Co. He was with the Delaware Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company for three years as contractor. In 1872 and 1873 he was a member of the Tuscaloosa Mining and Transportation Company who were prospect- ing with a view to opening up some coal lands in Tuscaloosa County, Ala. He then moved to Rising Fawn, where he was engaged by a New York company, who were engaged in operating the Rising Fawn tron Furnaces. He then came to Chattanooga and engaged in the real estate business. From here he went to Fort Payne, Ala., to open up the Beson Gap Coal Mines for a New York company, and this proved another failure. He afterward engaged in land surveying in DeKalb County, and moved from there to Soddy, where he has since remained. He was superintendent of the mines of Dayton in 1882 and 1883 under John H. Furgason, after which he went to Texas and Arkansas to open up mines for Carson & Louis, of Weatherford, Tex. For the past two years he has been located at Soddy, where he has been looking after the ventilation of the mines owned by The Soddy Coal Company. In 1886 Mr. Lloyd was the Demo- cratic candidate for the Legislature from this Legistative district, cutting down the great majority by which the county is usually carried to 200. During the late war he commanded a company in Fitz John Porter’s army corps. He engaged in all the battles and skirmishes in which his regiment took part up to the time of his separation from the army. He married Miss Annie Morgan in 1870. She was a native of Wales, and came to America, September, 1870. This union resulted in the birth of five children three of whom are living: Katie, Arthur, Emma, Eudora, Theophilus (deceased) and Elizabeth (deceased). Mr. Lloyd is a member of the Congregational Church as was also his wife. He has been quite a successful geologist and practical miner, and has walked over everyHAMILTON COUNTY. 959 foot of the mineral lands of Kast Tennessee, North Carolina and Alabama. His father lived and died in Wales. He was a soldier in the Peninsular war, engaged in the battle of Waterloo, and ranked as colonel in the Brit- ish Army. Hedied when our subject was quite small. A. Lloyd, general superintendent of the Soddy Coal Company, was born June 14, 1845, in South Wales. He came to America in the spring of 1863, and located first in Pennsylvania. He moved from there to Ohio, and in 1867 came to Soddy, where he has since remained. He was one of a company of twenty, mostly Welsh people, who organized a company, and our subject was sent to Soddy to prospect for coal, which being very promising, they at once opened up the coal mine. There being no railroad by which to ship their coal, they built a narrow gauge railroad to the river and shipped by steamboat. In 1874 it was reorganized, and the present company took charge. A. Lloyd and L. W. Morgan were the stockholders in the old company, the rest of the company were new members. It began with a sapacity of 500 bushels per day, and it now has a capacity of 500 tons of coal and coke, Arrangements are now being perfected for a much greater capacity. Mr. Lloyd is principally concerned in this company’s coal interest in Arkansas. Our subject received his education mostly by his individual application, having attended subscription schools only six months in his life. He is the fourth of five children, born to Evan and Catherine (Reese ) Lloyd. The father was born about 1808 and died in 1875. The mother was born about 1814, and died in 1873. They came to America in 1870. Our subject began life as a day laborer, and by his industry and ability as a business manager and financier has accumulated quite a fortune. He married’ Miss Margaret Evans June 4, 1864. She is also a native of Wales, born in 1840, and the daughter {Morgan and Eliza Evans, natives of Wales. Mrs. Lloyd came to America in 1863, and by her union with our subject became the mother of six children: Elizabeth (deceased October 8, 1886), Evan (assistant bookkeeper at the Soddy Coal Company’s officein Chattanooga), Morgan (deceased), Kate Helen, Maggie and Ida. Mr. and Mrs. Lloyd are members of the Welsh Congregational Church. Mr. Lloyd usually votes the Republican ticket, but votes more for principle and the best man. He isa Royal Arch Mason and is a member of the I.O0.OF. The chureh with which Mr. Lloyd is connected was organized in 1871, and its congregation is composed of Methodists, Baptists and Congregation- alists, principally the latter. Itis in a very prosperous condition, has a splendid Sunday-school, and Rey. Morgan is the pastor. He is a native Welshman and preaches in both the English and Welsh languages. Rare 4ee eS Ss / = ae a eae rn aaa 5 5a ee Nee eee ee, — aS eee : - rem ae oars eg E re vee nite esate SS ———s Sere wie ret naa \ { 7 j Hi! 14: Hii } ? Hi 1 Seo sey sagiers eo gin ee mae pis att ih ip ea NBA I OE Gate . be : $ sas : - rare OP aes “ = ee = = Saar eee $F rice ean paar aaa fs roar - - = Sao aoraeaa aes sees eee, a = ’ : ~ ae ea = ear mees Seemetener ae : i es ee Seep Sree. — br a es & : : ' “ 2 aon — i a —-— x - - “ee “ sees 15y si . ; . 7 7 ~ eet ice > mda : : —_ _ oo “= : So SS Laem hata Se ne sme mee: a aitweee i AL Soe See : Seroiinieat emanates = saw - 7 ee = : = , a ea oa a ne : = ‘ ~ os _ - — = “ = vee - ; eee . naan SanaeEneEenene nneanes oe 7 é 5 = iene == ; = ” sae oe 2 a maar 960 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. ‘ Alyn fy William R. Lloyd, superintendent of the Sale Creek Coal Company, was born December 4, 1838, in South Wales, and came to America in 1861. He returned to Wales in 1862, and again in 1866. He worked until fourteen years of age, after which he worked at coal min- on a farm He began life a poor man and owes his elevation to ing as a day laborer. his present position to his own ability as a practical miner. He received his education in the subscription schools of South Wales, and at the age of twenty-one began working for himself. In 1859 he married Miss Margaret Thomas also a native of Wales, who came to this country with her husband. By this union they had these children: William T. (killed by a powder explosion at Soddy, in May, 1866), Evan (deceased), Catherine (Mrs. Thomas), Margaret Ann (Mrs. Price), Jane, Thomas, Rebecce aad Taliesyn, Our subject’s parents, Evan and Catherine (Reese) Lloyd, were natives of Wales, and they in company with Mrs. Lloyd’s mother came to America in 1870. Our subject is a Republican in polities, and he and wife have been members of the Congregational Church for many years. He has been superintendent of the Sale Creek Mines since the fall of 1881, and has the respect and confidence of all who know him. Morgan Llewellyn, secretary and treasurer of the Chattanooga Foun- dry and Pipe Works, is a native of Lehigh County, Penn., born Janu- arv 20. 1846. and the son of William and Mary (Morgans) Llewellyn, both natives of Wales. Our subject was reared to manhood in his native State. and received a fair academic education. arly in life he engaged in the iron business, and later: engaged in mercantile pursuits for himself at Alliance. Ohio. In 1869 he came to Tennessee, and engaged in the mercantile business at Knoxville, and then engaged in the coal business thirty miles above that city, being superintendent of the mines for eight years. He moved to Washington, D. C., in 1879, and accepted a position as clerk in the postoffice department, where he continued four years. In 1883, he resigned to re-enter the coal business at Oliver Springs, Tenn., owning an interest in the Winters Gap Coal Company of that place at the present time, and is secretary and treasurer of the same. June, 1884, he came to Chattanooga, and accepted a position as bookkeeper with the Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works, was elected secretary in July, 1885, and treasurer in July, 1886, being also one of its stockholders. In 1868 he wedded Sallie A. Powell of Pennsylvania, and four living chil- dren resulted from this union—two sons and two daughters. Mr. Llewellyn is a Republican, a Knight of Honor,a Royal Arch Mason, and a member of the Presbyterian Church. The Loomis & Hart Manufacturing Co., saw mill, building material and.HAMILTON COUNTY. 961 wholesale manufacturers of furniture. The business was started in 1866 by J. F. Loomis and F, J. Bennett, under the firm name of Loomis & Ben- nett. In 1875 John A. Hart boug ht the interest of Mr. Bennett, and the bus- iness was conducted by Loomis & Hart until] 1884, when J. T Arnold, F. L. Winchester, A. J. Gohogan and A. G. Stivers purchased an interest in the business, and the same continued under the name of Loomis, Hart & Co., which firm extended their capacity and increased the business to such an extent that it was decided. on January 1, 1887, to incorporate as the Loomis & Hart Manufacturing Go: This company owns their man- « \ > ufacturing site at the foot of Pine and Cedar Streets. consisting of about fifteen acres. They e mploy about 150 men, and do an annual business approximating $250,000, The officers of the company are J. F. Loomis, president; J. T. Arnold, secretary; A. J. Gahagan, treasurer; F. L. Winchester, manager of mills and manutacturing department, and Ae Ge Stivers, manager of their sash, door and blind department. D. B. Loveman & Co. This well-known wholesale and retail dry goods house was established in 1875 by D. B. and H. H. Loveman, who started the business on a small scale. In 1877 Mr. Ismar Noa became a member of the firm, Mr. H. H. Loveman retiring. In the fall of 1886 this firm completed its present large and commodious business block, where they have since carried on their business. In January, 1887, Mr. I. Noa retired from the firm, and Messrs. J. N. Mills and William McDonald were admitted. David B. Loveman is a native Hungarian, born July 29, 1844, and came to the United States in 1853. He was reared to manhood on a farm in Michigan, and in 1860 came to Tennes- see, where he followed clerking in Nashville, Atlanta, Rome (Ga.), and Tuscaloosa, Ala. He engaged in business for himself at Atlanta from 1869 until 1875 in the firm of Friedman & Loveman, also in the firm of William Rich & Co., when he came to Chattanooga, where he has since | been actively engaged in business. June 18, 1873, he married Miss Eva Wolfe, of Baltimore, Md., by whom he had three children—one son and two daughters. He is one of the incorporators of the Chattanooga, Rome & Charleston Railroad. He is the originator and is one of the largest stockholders of both building associations of Chattanooga, and is vice-president in both. He is a Republican in National politics and independent in local affairs. He is an ancient member of the Masonic fraternity, and a good citizen. Capt. John Pomfret Long, of Chattanooga, was born at Knoxville, Tenn., November 25, 1807. His father was William Long, a native of | Mecklenburg County, N. C., born February 19, 1775, settled at Knox- i ville in 1797, married Miss Jane Bennett in 1805 ), resided at Knoxville itputes ~ a Be ng, eg Seman ciate oo sheers - te i ape ee a aay ae Reclapitierationgt erat aes conti dae se eee : e a al store, which he continued, with varylng success, until 8 0. e was then elected city recorder of Chattanooga, and filled the position three years, until the city was evacuated by the Confederates, Prior to the evacuation, in 1862, he was appointed provost-marshal of N A Shan WN eee ee . : Chattanooga by Gen. McCown, and served in that capacity several months. A few days after the battle of Chickamauga his house was torn down and his effects destroyed. He having gone South in the meantime, leaving his family in Chattanooga, they subsequently rejoined him at Griffin, Ga., where they remained until the close of the y * AL ~ a, 2 = 7 ae ° 3} * 3 2 . war. Capt. Long then returned to find himself without home or prop- erty, and a family to support. He began business as a real estate agent, and fortune favored him, for he soon was very successful. In 1868 he applied to Judges Trewhitt and Adams, at Chattanooga, for a law license, which was granted. His practice has been principally in the chancery court, where his knowledge of the land and titles in Chattanooga has been of great value to him. Notwithstanding his losses by war and going security, he has accumulated a nice property, mostly in real estate. When he first came to Ross’ Landing—then a mere ferry and steamboat landing in an Indian country—he found no postoffice and no postroads. He made application to the postoffice department for a postoftice, which was granted, and he was appointed postmaster, without compensation. The name of the postoffice was changed to Chattanooga in 1838. Capt. Long held the postmastership until 1844, when he had to give way for one of the friends of President James K. Polk. In 1832 he east his first vote for Gen. Jackson, his next was for Hugh L. White, and thence- forward he voted the Whig ticket from Harrison to Bell, since which time he has been a Democrat. He attended the Whig State convention at. Murfreesboro in 1841, when Jones was nominated for governor against Polk. In February, 1861, he voted against secession, but when President Lincoln ordered out troops, he voted for secession. He was always a States’ rights man, as was his father before him. He has, however, never been so warm a partisan as to vote the party ticket unless he liked the men; always considered it a duty to vote, but equally a duty to scratch objectionable names trom the ticket. In 1845 he was elected to take his father’s place as an elder in the Presbyterian Church, which he had joined in 1843. He was a commissioner of the town of Chattanooga when the land was subject to entry, and the occupants were entitled to preference of entry. The three commissioners, Aaron bilcee tae ag mag a aces “geet ; ele ae Rice gee Rn ip ett LEILA ja SE a ad lla a ata Ase = a os =e a eas -~ em ee ~ A eae Tet ee Se eee i =e z oon —_ ~3 eee any - = — aera! Snes er eee iene at Scat « an anes fa ase ME ny = J ete ee a a5 erent a Sas re omer coe 964 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. M. Rawlings, George W. Williams and Capt. Long, entered the quarter- . > 9 - ¢ 5 : - section. sold the lots, and made titles to the purchasers April 20, 1839, which was the day on which the town of Chattanooga had its birth. Capt. Long’s staying power is illustrated by the fact that he has never yet seen the Mississippi River, and of the large cities only a few. Capt. Lone was married to Miss Eliza Smith November 6, 1834, at Smith’s : oO ~ a f — x | r x Cross Roads (now Dayton), Rhea Co., Tenn. ary 25, 1813, at Washington, Khea Co., Tenn. Mrs. Long was born Janu- Her father was Will- iam Smith, a native of Massachusetts, who came to Knox County in 1808: was a school teacher, and had for one of his pupils Dr. J. G. M. Ramsey, the historian, who said of him. ‘‘He was one of the best com- y « mon school teachers I ever saw. Mrs. Long’s mother was Elizabeth Cozby, daughter of Dr. James Cozby, a man noted in the early history of East Tennessee as a physician and an Indian fighter. (See Ramsey’s History of East Tennessee. ) Mrs. Long’s brother, Dr. Milo Smith, was an able physician, and for several terms mayor of Chattanooga, where he died in 1868. Mrs. Long was educated at Knoxville; made a profession of religion and joined the church in 1843, the same day her husband mace profession and joined. of her married life, but is beloved for her sweetness of temper. fond of the company of young tolks: that has carried her through all her troubles; She has been an invalid the greater part She is has an unconquerable will power is notably cheerful and pleasant, and, for one of her age, remarkably active. especially when “upon hospitable eares intent.” ehildren—all born in Chattanooga. ehildhood. years ‘oll, — ((A) James Cozby Long, born December 2 T ) this union there Elizabeth Jane Long, died sixteen years old. 1844: educated in were eleven Five of these died in infancy and The others are: (1) William Pomfret Long, died nineteen (3) the Naval Academy at Annapolis; resigned and joined the Confederate Navy in 1361, attaching himself to the fleet along the coast of North Carolina. He was in the fight at Roanoke Island, the second in command of the “ Curlew.’’ Capt. Hunter. He was then transferred to the ‘“‘ Merrimac,” as midshipman, and was in the famous naval fights at Hampton Roads, and remained with his ship until she was burnt. at Mussel Shoals for a while. at Birmingham, Ala. He was then transferred to Drury’s Bluff, and finally to Plymouth, N. C., and was on board the iron-clad “ Plymouth,” when she was blown up by the United States Navy:- He next served under Capt. Moffit on a blockade runner. he went into civil engineering, and had charge of the Government works After the war He is now a manufacturer of iron paint He married, at Elyton, Ala, November 20, 1872, Miss Frances Walker, and has four children: William Walker, JohnHAMILTON COUNTY. 965 Pomfret, James Cozby and Mary. (4) John Pomfret Long, Jr., born March 4, 1847; joined Col. Walker’s Nineteenth Tennessee Regiment in May, 1864, at Dalton, Ga.: participated in all the fights from there to Atlanta, and on July 22, 1864, was disabled by a shell taking his foot off; died March 1, 1880, unmarried. (5) Milo Smith Long, hota May 10, 1850; graduated in medicine at Nashville, and is now in Waleates (6) Marcus Bearden Long, born January 27, 1854; now a civil engi- neer, and was for a while engaged as engineer in Mexico on the Atchi- son, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad; unmarried. One of the aims of Capt. Long’s life has been to give his children something to start upon and to help them attain a standing in society, and he believes that every man ought to have a home and a family, and next, that he has duties fo per- form as a citizen. He has desired wealth, and has been sometimes up and sometimes down, but has always made it a rule to pay his debts. With one exception he has always made a profit on whatever he has sold. He never swore an oath in his life. and was brought up to regard the Sabbath. He has never been dissipated, though not always strictly temperate. He is a self-assertive man, and of quick temper. Being the oldest citizen of Chattanooga, he is often resorted to as an oracle on matters pertaining to the history of persons, families and property in that now important city. He has been a public-spirited man all along, and is uniformly spoken of as the best representative man of the city where he located when it was simply a river landing, and surrounded by the Cherokees. It was very appropriate that in 1881 he was selected to write the historical sketch of Chattanooga, on the occasion of represen- tatives of the North and the South meeting at that city to shake hands over the bloody chasm. His article printed in the Chattanooga Times in September, 1881, is full of valuable history—local, personal and general. J. T. Lynn, secretary, treasurer and superintendent of the Chattanooga Gas Light Company, is a native of Pittsburg, Penn., his birth occuring in the year 1856, son of James and Jane (Ferguson) Lynn, who were natives of Belfast, Ireland, and Glasgow, Scotland, respectively. The parents both came to America when young, and were married at Pittsburgh where the father died in 1857. The mother is yet living, and resides with her children, part of the time at Evansville, Ind., and part of the time with our subject. J. T. Lynn was educated, largely, in the public schools of Allegheny, and at about the age of fourteen years, began serv- ing an apprenticeship at the machinist’s trade on the Northern Pacific Railroad, being the first boy that worked on that railroad. From 1876 to 1881 he was connected with the gaslight company otf Pittsburgh but atee oY " * aaa it Moisi San imag Umer bi ea sores e: Quine s © Cee EE eg, arg es a 5 os shee Sager 2p hee Ned ie tat a does penn Bn naa Oe ~ REST SS Oo scammer gaa = * =a hacgiehdulesticstdimssthagatcica sas saat peunarerienanamenressnenettoerenaesrscton tpsmares 966 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. the latter date moved to Evansville, Ind., and from there to Chattanooga in 1888, where he has since resided. Mr. Lynn is a member of*the Uniformed Rank, and major of the First Tennessee Regiment, is a Knight Templar in Masonary, and is the president of the Endowment Rank of K. of P., of this city. In November, 1881, he married Miss Emma Blackstock, a native of Pittsburg, Penn. HM. Martin. D. D. S. and M. D:, is a son of J. A. and J. D: ( Black ) Martin, both of whom were born, reared and married in Pennsylvania. The father was a dentist by profession, having practiced about forty years. Their family consisted of three echildren—two sons and a daughter. The other son is paymaster inthe United States Navy. Our subject was born October 23, 1860, in Lancaster County, Penn., and at the age of twelve began to extract teeth. His education was limited to the common schools, his health preventing a more thorough course. After following mercantile pursuits for some time he entered the dental department of the University of Pennsylvania, graduating in 1881. Healso gradyated from the medical department the following year. The same year he came to Chattanooga and practiced medicine a year, being one of those chosen to vaccinate the city, during the small-pox epidemic of 1882-83. He then practiced dentistry tor over three years, when failing sight drove him from the profession. In 1886 he opened the drug store that he is now operating. Heis a member of the Chattanooga Medical Association and of the East Tennessee Dental Association. In 1883 he married Miss Margaretta Harding, a native of Pennsylvania, and tothem was born one child, McCloy. Dr. and Mrs. Martin are members of the Episcopal Church. A. H. Marston, treasurer and manager of the Chattanooga Chair Company, is a native of the State of New York, and is a son and the only surviving child of Samuel F. and Carrie May (Blakely) Marston, who were natives of London, England. Realizing that America possessed far greater advantages over England for laboring people, and being only rn) in moderate circumstances, the parents immigrated to this country and were married in New York State. Later they moved to Minnesota, the father now being a resident of St. Paul, where he is engaged in the man- utacture of wagons, carriages, etc. A. H. Marston was reared and educated in the State of Minnesota, and was there engaged in saw mill- ing until 1876, when he came to Chattanooga. From 1878 to 1885 he was an active member of the firm of Loomis. Hart & Co., but in December of the latter year, purchased an interest and assumed control of the Chattanooga Chair Company, continuing in that manner until the present time. Under Mr. Marston’s management the company he repre-a ee of HAMILTON COUNTY. 967 sents has greatly improved in every way, and it is recognized as one of the leading manufacturing institutions of the city. April 30, 1876, Mr. Marston was united in marriage with Miss Carrie M. Everett, and to their union two children have been born—one now living. J. W. Majors, keeper of the county jail at Chattanooga, is a native of Marion County, Tenn., born April 7, 1839, and the only child of Nelson and Penelope (Conner) Majors. Mr. and Mrs. Majors died when the subject of this sketch was quite small. He received his education prin- cipally at Strawberry Plains, East Tenn. He was deputy sheriff and jailor under A. B. Conner in 1867, after which he followed agricultural pursuits until September, 1886, when he was appointed to the position heisnowholding. In June, 1862, he enlisted in the Sixth Indiana Cavalry, Company K, and was orderly sergeant of the same. He was in the Atlanta campaign and in the raid to Macon, under Gen. Stoneman. He was mustered out in 1864 at Indianapolis. In 1867 he married Miss Mary Smith, daughter of William and Jane M. (Macy) Smith. Three chil- dren were the result of this union: Cicero H., Jennie P. and John W. In politics Mr. Majors is Conservative, although reared a Republican. He has served the city as city and Metropolitan police, acting in the latter capacity six monts and the former twelve months. He was brought to Hamilton County when only two years old, wherehe has since resided. He is a good man as his many friends can testify. George W. Martin, postmaster, is a son of Anderson ©, and Louisa (Buchanan) Martin, both natives of Lincoln County, Tenn., and both of Scotch-Irish lineage. The father was a farmer by occupa- tion, was a State senator, and also held various county offices. ‘The mother died in 1861 and the father in 1882. Of their three children, a daughter is dead, and one son is an extensive wool grower in Texas. The other son, our subject, was born near Fayetteville, Tenn., January 20, 1854, and received the common education of the average farmer boy. He subsequently attended the University of Tennessee, aiding himself by working on the college farm, by driving an ice wagon on the streets of Knoxville during vacation, by filling the positions of janitor and tutor, and by doing anything that presented itself. He graduated with second honors in the elass of 1877; after which he engaged with his brother in sheep husbandry in Texas. Through the influence of a college friend he secured the chief clerkship in the Chattanooga postofiice in 1880. Though under Republican rule, he retained that position, faithfully discharging the duties of his office, until 1885, when the change of administration opened the way to the position of postmaster for him. He has always been a firm supporter of Democracy. His promotion to the postmastershipFae * on a ? zs SPT MS at A A tee: a RE ne gs ogame me mon eugene — pn eee err sere wy aR en peemenme tonto oon RIOT St he RG e Rall oe x é A grail repent ee - eae Lot iat oe i.e 2 et TN NE a —— se" Pomemaihe crite a “if te . nes laos . eg eo es a TS mete of Se ¢ a ae a ne Me ae CRETE SOME — ae A a ee ee a are ae 3. ee: ~~ _ * = ASR mid a amie st a= - _ Letina anny, ge hears! ci ay sa at ae aipteoee tae See sed ee rte ner gee em Bras : EE hii Ce ete tine = 2 Saas: 23 ee ss Slaecmatielaiteeecs die ae, + encanto 2 org Siskel = Set eR ee A re — - z ee en ied . Sati tae ia ape ome tr Sa li ecco 2 rae ioe Ne rn La aan 968 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. was a triumph of the principles of civil service reform, of which he is a stanch advocate. His appointment gave general satisfaction to the citizens of Chattanooga irrespective of party, and as a public servant he eschews politics and attends strictly to business. Referring to his man- agement of his office, the civil service reformer said, ‘‘ Postmaster Martin furnishes a csood model for the President who appointed him.” In 1882 he married Miss Flora C. Benton, of Coldwater, Mich., by whom he has three children: Mabel, Kenneth and Elaine. Both Mr. and Mrs. Martin are members of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church of which he is a ruling elder. Rey. J. J. Manker, D. D., dean of the school of theology, and profes- sor of systematic theology in Chattanooga University, was born Decem- ber 24, 1839. His father was Rev. John Manker,: who located in Ohio when a young man, and married Miss Sarah Wright. This union was blessed by the birth of seven echildren—tfour sons and three daughters. For a livelihood he followed mercantile and agricultural pursuits. Besides this he wielded great influence for good by locally ministering to the spir- itual welfare of his fellow man. The mother, too, was a worthy Christian, both being of the Methodist persuasion. ‘They lie buried in the Buck- eye State. Our subject had good educational advantages. After comi- pleting his high school course he entered the Ohio Wesleyan University in 1858, but at the breaking out of the war he enlisted in Company B, Thirty-fourth Ohio Zouave as a private. Step by step he arose until he was commissioned captain of Company B, Fiftieth Ohio Regiment; his entire service extended over a period of nearly three years. After the war he entered East Tennessee Wesleyan University, from which he graduated in 1870 with the degree of A. B. In 1871 he received the honorary degree of A. M. from his first alma mater, the Ohio Wesleyan University, and in 1882 the degree of D. D. was conferred upon him by the University of Tennessee. During his course he had opportunities for teaching, and upon graduating was elected professor of Greek in that university, which position he filled for three years when he resigned and ras made presiding elder of the Knoxville District. In 1880 he was sent to the Methodist Episcopal Church in Chattanooga, and during his pastorate the magnificent stone church was erected. He was afterward appointed presiding elder of Chattanooga District, and in 1886 took his present position. In 1864 he married Miss Julia Tarbell, only sister of Judge David Tarbell, of Georgetown, Ohio. She died in 1880, leaving five children—four sons and one daughter. Rev. J. J. Menker was a member of the general conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church in 1876 and 1884, and of the Centennial Conference of Methodism at Balti-=— \— BD HAMILTON COUNTY. 969) more in 1884. He was a member of the General Missionary and Church Extension Committee from 1876 to 1880. He is a Knight Tem- plar, being at present Grand Prelate of the State of Tennessee. | W.S. Marshall, of the law firm of Wheeler & Marshall, is a native of Richland County, Ohio, and is a son of John & and Sarah (Stewart) Marshall who were natives of Pennsylvania and New York respectively, and whose respective deaths occurred in 1867 and in 1884. Until the year 1853 he remained in the State of his birth, attending the public schools, then entered Jefferson College of Pennsylvania, which craduated him in the year 1856. With the tide of immigration he drifted westward. and until the breaking out of the war made his home in lowa. He volun- teered his services for the preservation of the Union, and served until 1865, when hewas honorably mustered out of the service with the rank of major in Gen. McPherson’s‘corps. At the beginning of the war he held the commission of second lieutenant in the Fifth Iowa Volunteer Infantry. While in the South he became convinced of the healthfulness and future prosperity of Chattanooga, and at the close of the war moved to this city and embarked in the practice of his profession. In 1867 he became one of the firm of Stanley, Wheeler & Marshall, and later that of Wheeler & Marshall. This firm is one of the oldest, best known and most success- ful legal firms in Hamilton County. Mr. Marshall is a director of the Brush Electric Light Company, the Mount Lookout Railway Company, and is a member of the F. & A. M. and of the G. A. R. He has been twice married: first to Miss L. C. Bryant, afnative of Iowa, in 1868, who died the same year. Kate S. Montague, a native of Ohio, became his wife in 1873 and by her he is the father of one son, Stanhope Stewart. C. L. Magill, farmer in the Fourth District, was born March 12, 1845, in Hamilton County. He is one of ten children born to Hugh and Rebecca (Smith) Magill. The father was born in Roane County, Tenn., February 5, 1802. He was one of the best farmers in his locality and was forty years trustee and deacon in the Presbyterian Church. In 1834 he came to Hamilton County and settled on the farm where his son, C. L. Magill, now resides. At that time the country was full of Indians. ‘The mother was born December 11, 1805, in Roane County, Tenn., and was an active worker in the Presbyterian Church. She died January 18, 1886. The father died January 9, 1873. Our subject received a fair education in the common schools of Hamilton County, and assisted on the farm until his marriage to Miss Cyntha Little. She was born October 31, 1844, and is the daugter of John and Mary (Mar- ten) Little. Mr. Magill is aman who has succeeded under adverse cir- cumstances; he is well known and universally respected. He has a fineie an =H os be . eos fe - oe ‘ste oe ba See * a pee souesinsicapeatans ae _ we = phansipay - ‘ " ~ teh -sip epamtba: piepacnencaae ™ — on prenlermran m h e lnm a teen IRIN aero cy Ser ln ea eT Na aici aaa : eae wencigis opsieen-eeetm Peer carte 5 ee Lae eet A = ne a - a ge oy . mace ins Ynm cameraman = ae ate - eigen sits een * :. z amie “a ea oe < ri cn ae . nom . re . - a a ee . i = ae a SS ee ee! o nivta out = stan ones a a ~ = % * aatieenalt — re: SAREE E oo bee ge a hae censittennantendianes % . *. - m = a a a scsi i 5 has ; ; s : ee eae oe 2 3 ee _— ae uae ae : anon ees " a = — = - ais eae asian - Aen ra i na th Eh sci = machi pee Ree ool Set cee eee a nae me esa a = Fahar a Rake ee aan — a aan me a ea at anne = - - : . cteeeane . 2 * : rs eRe sans ~ - ¥ man aaa pestis shee eds se. caieetath Alton Rg ceil ome - ees : » _ = Stivers sine coil Sasi vimneeawriaaee pegeetinie Pio age ; Skee - r oe eee et ae Ses ee chain = wen penetra ~ — ponectaa Pook cepa acini fa : a mae en as papas: eso ps + = = vac aes === : : ee ae 5 ot oem a = ~ cee : : ais : = Pe ee — = . = = = — — = : ly : — ore ——= = eae zeet as i Nip are ra “ as eS a a eee Beeps ene Nt eles, 2 - SS SSS ERG A LTE Se RS TR ee ~ SI AA RE RT ET O70 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. farm of 230 acres, all under cultivation, located five miles from the corpo- rate limits of Chattanooga. Mr. Magill is a stanch Democrat, and cast his first presidential vote tor Horace Greeley. Mrs. Magill is a member of the Primitive Baptist Church. Harry A. McQuade, plumber, gas-fitter and dealer in plumbers’ and eas-fitters’ supplies, is a native of Nashville, Tenn., where he was reared, ars G0 began an apprenticeship to the plumbers’ trade, serving five years Henderson bros., of that city. He followed his trade there until 1870, when he came to Chattanooga, and was connected with the water company until 1881, when he established his present trade which has already grown to large proportions. He is also assistant chief of the fire department, being one of the charter members of the company. In 1868 he was united in marriage to Miss L. Chedbille, a native of France. To this union four children have been born, two daughters and one son now living. Michael and Margaret McQuade, the parents of our subject, were natives of Ireland, and came to the United States in 1845. They died in Nashville in 1862 and 1857 respectively. Our subject is a Knight of Pythias and served on the board of mayor and alderman in 1875, representing the Third Ward. Joab L. McCollum, agent for the North Carolina, & St. Louis Rail- road at Chattanooga,is a native of Dade County, Ga., born May 10, 1842; son of Joab and Sarah (Wood) McCollum, natives respectively of South Carolina and Georgia. Our subject was reared and educated in his native State. Upon the breaking out of the war he enlisted in Gen. John B. Gordon’s (now governor) original company, known then as the ‘Raccoon Roughs,” andserved throughout the war, being promoted through the various grades to major. He was wounded at the battle of Seven Pines, Va., also at Chancellorsville, Spottylsvania and Petersburg, some of these were very severe wounds in the head and limbs. April 19, 1866, he married Miss Bettie A. Holmes, a native of Whitesburg, Ala., and they have two sons and five daughters living. Soon after the war Mr. McCollum began railroading on the Alabama & Chattanooga Road, in this city, served in various capacities as agent, acting treasurer, book- keeper, master of transportation and superintendent of the road from 1868 to1871. Inthe latter year he entered the employ of the North Carolina & St. Louis Railroad, as conductor. During the latter part of 1873 he entered the service of the 8S. & L. & S. E. Railroad as assistant superin- tendent, and served this road about one year, with headquarters at Nash- ville. He re-entered the employ of the North Carolina & St. Louis Rail- road in the latter part of 1874 as train master at Chattanooga, and the following year was made agent at Chattanooga. Mr. McCollum is aHAMILTON COUNTY. O71 Democrat, a Mason, a member of the K. db 2X ©) WL WW, IK. of G FR. and of the Methodist Episcopal Church. Hugh L. McReynolds, M. D.. is a native of Cass County, Mo., born July 2, 1848, and the son of Coleman C. and Mary ( Callaway ) McReyn- olds, both born, reared and married in East Tennessee, where they lived In 1850 the father went to until 1844, and then moved to Missouri. Colorado, and there died. His calling in life was that of a physician. Four years after the death of her husband, the mother died of cholera, In their family were five children, three of whom are living—two sons and one daughter, the other son is a Missionary Baptist minister. Our subject, when nine years of age, was brought to East Tennessee, where he received his literary education. In 1868 he began the study of medi- cine under Dr. A. D. Scruggs, and graduated from the Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, in 1871, and also atthe same time, from the Philadelphia Lying-in Charity Hospital. For ten years he practiced at Mouse Creek, Tenn., and in 1882 came to Chattanooga. He is president of the United States Board of Examining Surgeons, a member of the Chattanooga and State medical association, and during 1883 he was physi- clan of the Hamilton County jail. In1871 he married Mattie L. Rice of Hast Tennessee, by whom he has three children—two sons and a daugh- ter. Both Dr. and Mrs. Reynolds are members of the Missionary Bap- tist Church. James P. McMillin, of Chattanooga, was born on Lookout Moun- tain in 1856, and is a son of the late Jonathan P. McMillin, who was a well known and prominent citizen of Chattanooga. He died in that city in 1882. Our subject was reared to manhood in Chattanooga, and educated at Kmory and Henry College, Virginia. In 1876 he engaged in the general insurance and real estate agency business, in which he has remained continuously ever since, with excellent success. He also engaged in the drug business for four years of this time. In 1881 he married Miss Lizzie Armstrong, of Knoxville, who bore him two children 2, —one son and one daughter. He is a Democrat in politics, a Royal Arcanum, and a worthy member of the Methodist Episcopal Church. Arthur R. Melendy, D. D. S., is the son of A. B. and Anna B. (Rice) Melendy, natives of Vermont and Massachusetts respectively. They were married in Vermont and came to Tennessee in 1869. The father followed farming as an occupation, but is now retired from active life and. lives in Knoxville, Tenn. ‘Their family consisted of two sons. Our subject was born March 4, 1859, in Vermont and educated at the Univer- sity of Tennessee. He received his dental education at Vanderbilt Univer- sity, from which he graduated in 1883 taking the Morrison prize, on bestma eT eee 2. Daa RE aA, ee id il oo epee ee ote ee a ee ny i i Se ae 55 Seri Saye tae oe as eae a er see eo cee Lor omeseniinn Tape raee ge Na cab oe ‘i é j y aS a | , 4 5 ‘4 : ty Oh lige by we rae : chee ener aceentaene mamencc eae a - I we ee em - PATNA pMDI - — wae owe wtp + Ll ee gg cl er ba = ee Spee ne it --- ae SS = Sy oe Berea Se as erences nee = s * 1 e 7 1 epee E = JE } ie 4 , ; My a % iS = A 4 jj 1 ; ? ‘ : ie ih ia 2 ae et ine Pac f fo air? ‘Gh * it t és { el ge ‘ vat i (a Sat if $8 : rea ie ae a 1.9 : : , i ' ae ‘J : TT ie Peo ee 4 at 5 ; ce? ; at Vi ign ; ia i t ; { I : c ; ith he a t } tT ; i cH ; j ; i \ } qo) i i ; 7b : {| oe } f ist | F a ; a 5 ot a! : tant: | tig ; ibe % tes ‘ies a ce e b bee i : ; . 2 q : 1 fi 4 é a) ‘te i} hear a ob ee ‘ igs r{ oe ‘ ' a: : a ' aay ia amy ‘ey eee 1, a 4 i is t 5 } f HP ity ny ; i 5 i ; ; Rfee ; ERG 1 j PA ah) . 4 : iif | g t ina ny ‘’ 1 Pete) d ; j 2 ; PH | f a : tan | tI ea ) i tiga) | Pa | | ' j [ | ' | | +) he hn | | f | HG! jel i Sian ii ih j F ; ae i . a) ii ray gece , } j ei} EER! * acd ea] i t } “ ' i , { 6 tr Meer, eas 7) Bit veka “ty r cleal , ait 4 rabeali p { iiss : h f al i . 4 mY Pit ate k +t | 1 eee ai) 9) ai } Loe gl: Ba ; ieee at ee mal! pi : iat 4 ay a mead 4 q | ; BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. 974. father, Frederick Jones, was a soldier in the Revolutionary war, was & Whig at that time. His son, Jeremiah H., was a soldier in the Creek Indian war and was a clerk for Gen. Rutus Gaines. His eldest son, James Jones, was a sailor. Our subject's brother, Harberd H. Moore, ras a soldier in the Seminole war twelve months. He was mustered out close of the war. prietors of the planing-mill, lumber yard, succeeded Gillispie & Co. (who The individual mem- = in Louisana at the Morrison & Woodward, pro door and blind manutactory, established the business in 1870) in January, L881. bers of the present frm are Robert Morrison, Richard H. Woodward and John B. Nicklin. In 1884 their building on Market Street was d by fire, but they had already commenced building their pres- r of Kast Tennessee freight depot. They sash, destroye ent works on King Street rea have their own timber in central Alabama and manutacture building material almost exclusively. They em] xtensive business. lov on an average seventy men, and are doing an e Theodore G. Montague, president of the First National Bank, of was born in Meigs County, Ohio, im 1836. Such available he improved. His first busi- Chattanooga, Tenn., advantages OL education as were as clerk, the leading store at the county seat, ness venture was to enter, he acquired some knowledge of where in the next two years He then taught school one term of four spent two years at the Pomeroy Pomeroy, goods and the ways of trade. after which Mr. Montague this school he entered the bank of Daniel & thorough business education he had acquired. the bank was suited to his tastes. and although circumstances seemed to draw him into other lines he returned to this work the first favorable opportunity. For three mining company, and from months, Academy. On leaving Rathburn, where he put in practice the The system of business 1n years he was the bookkeeper of a large coal this office, in 1863, Mr. Montague entered the United States service, as he One Hundred and Fortieth Regiment, Ohio Volunteer - Montague went to such places rave advantages for future adjutant of t Infantry. When the civil war closed Mi -n the Southern States as he thought might | growth and development. Being favorably impressed with Chattanooga, Tenn., he easily induced the friends with whom he had been associated in the banking business to visit that section, and the result was the organization, in 1865, of the First National Bank, with W. P. Rathburn as president and Mr. Montague as cashier. was ared-letter day in the young city’s history. the cashier for nineteen years when, on the de was chosen to the presidency. The organization of this bank Mr. Montague was ath of Mr. Rathburn he From the beginning the managementHAMILTON couNTY. 975 was judicious In the use of this capital by fostering all] worthy local enterprises. The history of the First National Bank for twenty-two years reflects the character of the men in control. Only $10,000 of the capital stoek was originally subscribed by citizens of Chattanooga, now a majority of the stock is owned by them. The dividends paid to the stockholders have heen larger than that of any bank in Bast Tennessee, and the capital and earnings now held by the bank and available for the wants of the ever increasing business is larger than that of any other bank in that section. My. Montague has not only officially but per- sonally encouraged and assisted in the organization of most of the business enterprises that have contributed to make Chattanooga the most progressive manutacturing city in the South. Among the leading industries with which he has been connected we mention the Roane lien Company, Lookout Water Company, Chattanooga Gas Company, Brush Electric Light Company, City Fire Insurance Company, Chattanooga Stove Company, Citico Furnace Company, Loraine Tool Company, Whitney (cotton) Mills. ete. Although prominently connected with the varied interests of this section, Mr. Montague has never been an aspirant for publie or political honors. The only exception was to serve ag alderman of the city one term. At this time the city finances were at a low ebb, and the board of aldermen retused to accept any pay for their services. In schools, churches and charities Mr. Montague is a reco = gs nized factor. In 1875 Mr. Montague married Miss Mary Thayer, of Boston, Mass., and by her is the father of four children. Mr. Montague and family are exemplary members of the Presbyterian Church. Daniel E. Nelson, M. D.. is the son of EH. HE. and L, &. (Fultz) Nel- son, natives of Tennessee and North Carolina respectively. Soon after marriage, they moved to Rutherford County, where the father followed agricultural pursuits, The mother died in December. 1864, and the father four months later. Of their family of nine children. five are now living. Our subject was born April 5, 1859. in Rutherford County, Tenn. The close of the war found this family of children without par- ents and almost without means ol subsistence. Our subject worked at all kinds of farm work, and Supported himself even in childhood. Hay- ing learned the rudiments of education, he. by his own efforts, acquired a good education and taught a three months’ school, studying medicine in the meantime. In 1879 he entered Vanderbilt University, and after one term, practiced his profession in Warren County for one year in order to enable him to obtain means to return and finish his medica] course, which he did, graduating in 1882. At the completion of -his course, he entered a competitive examination for a position in the city hospital ofea a roa Ah AA ace ans socio he Saanine on an = — . — — seedy se tapetah aes SEES on ca tate etn a ate see ' ? H AR WG h Ae iF ual ae i fiat) io ; fF j i ES Bi PP ay { \ ; EER tly Pa Hii F tet af peas He if | =e ae pues aie Ao mp cen Aeon = ee eee — 2 Seven s et ch hth aint ht we " eee tng * eee cea sce es ENS IO Raat _ - 5 os enantio —— aca ; i er ee ° Cpa ia ose. ~ LS Sea Ling ae = a = Sao Saeed peas mpi * Be sain Sarge dasha acme at Ve 976 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. essful in obtaining it. After serving about eleven harge of the small-pox hospital, and 1e came to Chattanooga, recom- Tn 1886 he was one of six to Nashville, and was suce months he was chosen physician in ¢@ after the close of this institution 1n USSset mended by the authorities of the hospital. for the position of coroner of Hamilton County, and succeeded in Nelson is secretary of Hamilton County of the State Medical Society, secretary Church, and medical examiner for the apply obtaining that position. Dr: Medical Society, also a member and treasurer of the Christian Manhattan Life Insurance Company. Nixon & Wester, grain dealers and hants of Chattanooga, established their business in 1877 on Market The firm is individually composed of William M. who erected their large warehouse in ar Montgomery Avenue, and 1.000 car loads grain, etc, general storage and forwarding mere Street near Sixth. Nixon and Samuel D. Wester, 1883) Lt Is situated on Convert Street ne Q) square feet; capacity, enty men, and buy and sell, principally grain and hay, shipping extensively, to all Southern States. They also , and do a general storage business. William M. Nixon was July 8, 1850, son of George W. and Ann spectively of Virginia and Tennessee. « covers about 45,00 They employ, on an average, tw store cotton born in Roane County, Tenn., EB. (McElwee) Nixon, natives re W.M. Nixon was reared and educated in his native county, came to Chattanooga in 1870, and was employed in the orain and grocery busi- ness as clerk and bookkeeper until he engaged in his present business in 1877. He is also director in the Third National Bank and of Forest Hill Cemetery, and president of the Chattanooga & Alabama Packet December 3, 1874, he was united in matrimony to Miss Mag- Three living children are the daughter. He is a Democrat, a of H. and ex-president of the transportation committee Company. gie G. Peak, of Meigs County, Tenn. result of this union—two sons and a member of the Royal Arcanum, AG: board of trade, and is now chairman of the of the board of trade. M. J. O’Brien, wholesale and retail merchant, was and brought to New York City when a boy. He received his education in the schools of that city and had started to college when his parents died. At the age of fourteen he was thrown upon his own resources. In-1867 he came to Chattanooga, and aiter working im a printing office a short time clerked ina store. About 1869 he engaged in the grocery busi- ness on a capital of $90, and by hard work and close attention to trade has succeeded in establishing his present business. He is now running a large wholesale house which extends from Market to Broad, He was first born in Lreland has two traveling men, and 1s doing a flourishing business.~af HAMILTON COUNTY. 977 president of the board of trade, was president of the Iron and Coal Manufacturing Association, and was director in the Third National Bank. He is supreme treasurer of the Catholic Knights of America, In 1870 he married Mollie A. Horan, who died in 1884. leaving three children. For eighteen years our subject has been connected with the business interests of this city. He is a member of the Catholic Church as is also Mrs. O’Brien. Daniel J. O’Connell, a member of the firm of O’Connell and Rogers, and secretary of the Union Railroad Company, is a native of the Buckeye State, born in the year 1851. He came to Chattanooga in 1880, and engaged in business with C. E. James until the building of the road was commenced, since which time he has been secretary of the same. He is a Democrat in politics, a member of the Catholic Church, and an energetic, thorough-going business man. AGWar Palmer DD. 1) S:, 1s) sons of ohn T. Palmer, a native of Dublin, Ireland, who came to America and settled in Georgia. He here married Elizabeth Barbour, a native of Georgia. He was a physician and a noted surgeon. During the late war he was surgeon of the Seven- teenth Georgia Regiment. He was a graduate of Bellevue College of Surgeons, New York, was for two years surgeon of Chimborazo Hospital, Richmond, Va.., during the war, and afterward surgeon of the Seven- teenth Georgia Regiment. He wasa graduate of the State University at Athens, Ga., and was also county judge. He died in 1865. Having lived in Georgia until 1873. the mother came to Chattanooga where she now lives. Their family consisted of seven children. Our subject was born in Wilkes County, Ga., May 5, 1845, and received his literary education at Oxford, Ga., and his dental education at the University of Tennessee in 1884. though he had practiced since 1872. In 1878 Miss Lizzie A. Brause, a native of Tennessee, became his wife. Her parents were natives of Saxony, and at an early day they came to this country. The result of our subject’s union was one child: Albion Elizabeth. Dr. Palmer has held the office of president of the East Tennessee Dental Association twice, vice-president twice, and is now secretary. 4. C. Patten is the secretary of the Chattanooga Medicine Company, wich was organized in 1879. The company does a manufacturing busi- ness exclusively, and prepares proprietary goods which find ready sale in every State south of the Ohio and Missouri Rivers. Twenty-five to forty persons are employed, and traveling salesmen cover the extensive terri- tory where the goods find a market. The company does a large amount of advertising in newspapers, and use more postage stamps than any other five establishments in Chattanooga, in mailing their pamphlets,er Sag ge ee ronaa. =n aie hn es Sn ee ae ge ee eee ene ese ae mbes = ae a ee Coma aatalaply wa = vs ree —e { ‘ ; sf Fe ty ae 5 } i i i Se ann ee 978 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. etc. Mr. Patten was born in Jefferson County, IN? Yo, May 3; 1840, and is the son of John A. and Betsy (Cartter ) Patten, both parents being of English descent and natives of New York. Their family consisted of four sons and one daughter. The father died in 1847. Our subject, in received an academic education. When the late war broke out, ent of Lllinois, he entered the Federal service in Ired and Fifteenth Illinois Regiment. At the 1e received a severe wound and was discharged, but after recovering, was commissioned second lreutenant of Company H. One Hundred and Forty-ninth New York Regiment. After three the effects of his wound, he resigned, and in 1864 youth, being then a resid Company H, One Hunt battle of Chickamauga | months, owing to located in Chattanooga. For about ten years he was in the book busi- ness, and for two years conducted the Chattanooga Times. Since 1879 he has been secretary and treasurer of the above company. In 1870 he married Miss Mary M. Rawlings, and by her has one daughter, Lizzie O. In 1875 his wife died. He is a Knight Templar and was the first master of Temple Lodge. Allen Parker, a farmer of the Fourth District. was born December 14, 1820, im Rhea County, Tenn., and is the eldest of a family of ten children born to Elisha and Martha (James) Parker. The father was of English descent and came to Hamilton County in 1821. His second wife wasa Mrs. Schoolfield, formerly Miss Rice Bythe, who bore him six children. Mr. Parker was quite a prominent citizen of the county, and was justice of the peace for nearly twenty years. He was a soldier under Gen. Andrew Jackson in the Creek war. He died in 1866, seventy-seven years of age. Our subject received his education mostly by individual application. He assisted his father on the farm until nineteen years of age, when he married Miss Dovy Beeson, a daughter of Solomon and Mar- garet N. Beeson. This union resulted in the birth of these children, viz.: Minerva ( Mrs. Fryar), Tandey (deceased), Wiley F., Lizzie (Mrs. Morris), Margaret N. (deceased), James (deceased), John and Jeffer- son. Mrs. Parker died in 1870, and Mr. Parker took for his second wife Miss Teressa Carden, in 1875 or 1876. She is a daughter of Robert Garden. The result of the last union was the birth of four children: Bobert, Dovy, Ida and Allen. In politics Mr. Parker is a Democrat. He began life as aday laborer; he now owns 1,200 acres of land two miles and a half southwest of the corporation line of Chattanooga. He followed farming until 1854, when he engaged in railroading as a day laborer, and afterward filled the position of contractor and conductor on construction trains, ete. He continued at the business until 1877, since which time he has followed farming. He was elected justice of the- Cen) ee i HAMILTON COUNTY. 979 peace in 1876, and-still holds the office. He has given universal satisfac- tion in the discharge of the duties of this office. His grandfather, Parker, was a soldier in the Revolutionary war. William C. Payne, Esq., the subject of this sketch is descended from one of the oldest and most worthy families in Tennessee. His ancestors by both the paternal and maternal sides followed Sevier and Shelby from North Carolina and Virginia to the Watauga settlement about the year 1770; were with them at King’s Mountain, and afterward with Gen. James Robertson across the mountains to the French Lick, now the city of Nashville. Josiah Payne, his great-grandfather, was among the first of the little army that penetrated the wilderness to that frontier settle- ment, and his name appears upon the first tax list that was ever prepared for Davidson County. William Payne, his grandfather, and Elizabeth Payne, his grandmother, both being of the same name and distantly related, were married aboutthe year 1787, and soon thereafter removed to a point on the Cumberland River, about forty-five miles by land east from Nashville to what is now Smith County, cut the cane and built a home in the bend of that river which took its name from his settlement as Payne’s Bend, and is still known by that name. John Payne his father, son of William and Elizabeth Payne, was born on this old homestead in the year 1800, grew to manhood, and in 1823 was married to Eunice Graham Chambers, who was born in the year 1805, and was the worthy daughter of John Chambers another early immigrant to that settlement. John Payne died at the old home in April, 1848. his wife Eunice Chambers Payne surviving him many years, and died in the year 1883 at the age of seventy-eight years. William C. Payne our subject, was born to John and Eunice Payne in Smith County, Tenn., on the 9th of August, 1831, being the fourth of six children. He grew up on the old farm, and secured his education first at the country school near his father’s home, was afterward sent to Oakland Academy, at Dixon’s Springs, in Smith County, Tenn., from there he went to Irving College in Warren County, Tenn,, and thence to Cumberland University at Lebanon in Wilson County, Tenn., graduating from the law department of that institution in the year 1855. On the 27th of November, 1852, he was married to Miss Mary Joliffe Bruce, daughter of Dr. Edward H. and Harriet Martin Bruce. Dr. Edward Bruce and wife were Virginians by birth and edu- cation, who had moved to and settled in Smith County some years before. Dr. Bruce was the son of Robert Bruce, a Scotch gentleman, who came from Scotland at an early day, and settled in the valley of Virginia near Winchester. Hewas alineal descendant from Robert Bruce of Scotland. Our subject, after spending a year in the West, looking about, returned to2 AP Eo ET a EE " a PNR SN maa a aaa ana ee Sap lc ita apes anesinc oa DRAIA SSDS - ae ~ 980 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. his native State, and began the pr actice of law at the town of Sparta in White County, Tenn., in the early part of the year 18957. He at once took good rank in his profession, and was in a few months elected attor- ney-general for his district, which position he held until the breaking out of the civil war between the States. Being an ardent Southern man, and much attached to his native State, which a long line of honorable ancestry had helped to settle and build up, he entered the Confederate Army 10 September, 1861, serving first in the infantry, and afterward as a staff officer on the staff of Gen. George G. Dibrell. having sought military honors or preferment, he was an earnest supporter Though never of the Southern cause, until the close of the war. In November, 1866, Mr. Payne moved with his family to the city of Chattanooga, where he has since resided, engaged 1 in the practice of his profession. He has two sisters living: Mrs. Minerva Price, of Hartsville, Trousdale Co., Tenn., and Mrs. Lucy Williams. of East Nashville, Tenn., who with himself compose all that is left of his father’s family, the others dying in infancy. He and his estimable wife have had seven children, four of whom only are living: Lucy, Herbert, Margie and Alice. The family are members of the First Presbyterian Church at Chattanooga. Democrat, having ever believed in the teachings of Mr. Jefferson, and a In politics he is a strict construction of the fundamental written law. Thomas Parkes, vice-president of the Daisy Coal Company, first began prospecting for coal in 1880, and as soonas coal was discovered in paying quantities, opened up the mine and increased the capacity of In 1881 a stock company Mr. Parkes was born April 16, 1840, in Williamson County, and is the second of six children of Thomas and Elizabeth (Field) Parkes. Mrs. Parkes was a lineal descendant of Lord Scales, one of the early governors of Virginia, the mines to one hundred tons daily r average. was organized known as the Daisy Cc oal and Coke Company. and she and her husband were both of English ancestry. Our subject received his education at Franklin Academy. He was united in marriage to Miss S. E. Smith, of Nashville, Tenn., who is a daughter of George W. and Susan Smith. Mr. Smith was of German and Mrs. Smith of English descent. The result of our subject’s marriage was the birth of three children: Daisy, George and Thomas. Mr. Parkes was chairman of the board of police commissioners of Nashville for seven years. In May, 1861, he enlisted in Company H, Twentieth Tennessee Infantry of which he was lieutenant and afterward major on Gen. J. Wheeler’s staff. He served during the war, was captured but made his escape three weeks afterward. After the war he opened up the Daisy Coal Mines, and was a cotton commission merchant at Nashville, Tenn., style of the firm beingHAMILTON COUNTY. 981 Thomas Parkes & Co. Thomas Parkes, Sr., came to East Tennessee in 1833 to prospect for coal and iron. At that time he purchased land at and near Chattanooga and predicted that that city would be the future Pittsburg of America. He built the first cotton factory in Middle Ten- nessee, and owned the first steam cotton factory in Middle Tennessee. He was the inventor of the nail cutter now in use, but did not get it patented. Fifteen yéars later he went to Wheeling, Va., and found his machine in use. Itis now about the latest improved nail cutting machine in use. He was the projector and president of the first railroad running south from Nashville, and was a remarkable man in foreseeing the future manufacturing possibilities of the country. The railroad of which he was the projector, running south to Sheffield from Nashville, is now one of the principal routes South. Our subject is a Democrat in polities, and he and wife are members of the Methodist Episcopal Church South. J. A. N. Patterson, a farmer and merchant at Sale Creek. was born June 17, 18388, in Hamilton County, Tenn., and is the fifth of eleven children born to Lewis and Mary Y. (Pearson) Patterson, eight of whom are now living. Both parents were of Scotch-Irish descent. The father was born in 1796 in Tennessee, and came to this locality before Hamilton County was organized. He was magistrate for many years and died in 1867. He took a great delight in hunting in his earlier days, being considered the best shot and the champion turkey hunter on many occasions. ‘The mother was born in 1806 in Monroe County, Tenn., and died in 1872. Oursubject was educated in Sale Creek Academy principally, and assisted his father in farming until twenty-two years ofage. July 26, 1860, he married Miss E. 8. Coulter,daughter of T. J. and M. J. (Gamble) Coulter, and this union was blessed by the birth of five children, four of whom are living: William Preston, Robert Jefferson, Alfred L., John T. and J. N. (deceased). Mrs. Patterson died in 1877, and in 1879 Myr. Patterson married Margaret H. Wallace, a daughter of Benjamin and Mary Wallace. Mr. and Mrs. Patterson are members of the Presbyterian Church of which he has been an elder since 1868. He is a Democrat and cast his first presidential vote for John Bell. He has been a very successful farm manager and stock raiser. He began life in ordinary circumstances and lost most of his personal property during the late war. In 1862 he enlisted in Company C, First Tennessee Cavalry, and was discharged in 1863. He participated in all the battles and severe skir- mishes in which his company took part. In the fall of 1885 he openeda general store at Sale Creek, where he still continues. He is a successful farmer and an excellent citizen. Starling C. Peeples, of Chattanooga, was born in Gordon County,BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. 182 Ga.. October 25, 1850, and is a son of Drewry and Mary (Collier) Pee- ples, natives of North Carolina and Georgia respectively. Our subject grew to manhood and received his education in Georgia. In 1870 he came to Chattanooga, and was in the employ of his brother, William O., in the grocery business until the year 1880, when he became a member of the firm of W. O. Peeples & Bros. October 29, 1874, he married Miss Evaline Gregory, of Murray County, Ga., who died October 20, 1885, leaving two daughters: Mary EH. and Sarah A. Mr. Peeples is a Democrat in politics, a Knight of Pythias, a member of the Royal Arcanum. A. L. of. H. and the F. L. of H. He is also a member of the Methodist Episcopal Church South. W. O. Peeples & Bros., wholesale grocers, is individually composed of William O., S. C. and R. B. Peeples. ‘This firm was established in 1868 by W. O. Peeples and W. W. Jackson, succeeded by W. O. Pee- ples, later by W.O. Peeples and J. C. Edmondson, and still later by W. O. Peeples. About 1880 the present firm was established. In the spring of 1887 the firm erected the large brick hotel and business block at the intersection of Ninth, Chestnut and Carter Streets. It is a triangular shaped building, 140x275 feet at one end, four stories high and a basement. The hotel has 140 rooms, exclusive of office, dining-rooms, parlors, etc., and is estimated to have cost $85,000. There are eight business rooms on the ground floor, besides the hotel ofice. ‘Two rooms, d0x140 feet, and basement are occupied by W. O. Peeples & Bros., who have two traveling men on the road in the gen- eral grocery trade. This trade extends over Alabama, Tennessee and Georgia. They employ four men in the house, besides three of the firm. Their business averages $250,000 per annum, and is one of the most successful wholesale establishments in Chattanooga. John H. Peebles, superintendent of the union passenger depot and union ticket agent at Chattanooga, was born in Petersburg, Va., June 30, 1849, and is the son of William L. and Rebecca ( Harrison ) Peebles, both natives of Virginia. Our subject grew up and was edu- cated in his native State. In 1865 he came South, located in Nashville, and was in the employ of the North Carolina & St. Louis Railroad, as baggage master, but later was passenger conductor until 1876, when he came to Chattanooga and was ticket agent at this place for the Western & Atlantic and North Carolina & St. Louis Railroads until 1882, when he accepted his present position. April 18, 1878, he was united in marriage to Elizabeth B. Lanier, a native of Nashville, Tenn., and the fruits of this union were the births of three children—two sons and one daughter. Mr. Peebles is a Democrat in politics, a Knight Templar, a Mason and a member of the Methodist Episcopal Church. 4 > =~ — Tine = eS ; A i= en a ne cu = i nein “~ ae — z 990 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. She died about October, 1880. She was a helpless County in 1810. atism the last eight years of her life. She was an cripple trom rheum exemplary Christian from early womanhood. W. B. Seymour & Co., proprietors of the planing-mill and lumber yards, Chattanooga, established their business in September, 1883. The sosed of Walter B. Seymour and Henry T. and yards located between Burton and e, Virginia & Georgia Railroad tracks. and handle on an average 4,000,000 company is individually com} Olmstead, who have their mills East Streets and East Tennesse They employ seventy to eighty men, feet of lumber annually. Walter B. Seymour was born in Connecticut in 58. and came to Chattanooga in 1882. He traveled for the November, 18 of Chattanooga, for one year, and then Southern Lumber Company, established the present business in which well. Mr. Seymour is a Republican in politic fraternity, and ‘s an active business man. Hon. Alonzo G. Sharp, present mayor of Chattanooga, is a native of Fulton County, N. Y., his birth occurring January 9, 1841, son of John and Victoria Sharp, who were natives of Manchester, England. The parents immigrated to America in 1831 and until 1847 resided at Fulton County, ING Ye: engaged in farming; then moved to Franklin County, Ohio, where the father died, leaving a widow, three sons and eight About this time, and while yet a mere boy, arted out into the world to act and do for they are succeeding unusually s.a member of the Masonic daughters to mourn their loss. the subject of this sketch st himself. He succeeded in securing a good practical education by much perseverance and industry, and at the time of the breaking out of hostil- ‘ties between the North and South was acting in the capacity of book- keeper in the commission house of J. R. Paul & Co., of Columbus, Ohio. In April, 1861, immediately after the assault upon Fort Sumter, he enlisted as a private in Company C. Second Ohio Volunteer Infantry, and was a participant in the first battle of Bull Run. Wher his term of enlistment had expired he organized a new company for the service of which he was elected captain. This was Company B, Forty-sixth Ohio Volunteer Infantry. The regiment was ordered to Paducah, Ky., under command of Gen. W. T. Sherman, and from there up the Tennessee River to Shiloh, Corinth, Memphis and on into Mississippi. Before starting on the campaign against Vicksburg, Capt. Sharp was compelled to resign from the service on account of ill health, and he returned to Ohio to recuperate. November 17, 1864, he united in marriage with Miss Jennie Cushman, of Columbus, Ohio, and shortly after this event located in Chattanooga, Tenn., where he has since mostly resided, closely identified with the city’s business interests and prosperity. His careerHAMILTON COUNTY. 991 as a civil officer began in 1867 when he w as elected city treasurer, and from that time until the present he has rom been almost continuously in pub- lic life. In 1867-68 he was city treasurer, and in 1869 was mayor of the city, also serving as director in the Tennessee penitentiary at the same time. In 1870 he served about six months as clerk and master of Ham- ilton County Chancery Court under appointment of Chancellor D. C. Trewhitt. The fall of 1870 he was elected city recorder, and after sery- ing two elective terms, was elected city attorney, serving one year. At the close of his second term of recorder he formed a legal partnership with Judge D. C. Trewhitt, and practiced law until 1873, when was appointed by President Grant internal revenue collector for the Third Tennessee District, in which position he served until they were consolidated. In March, 1877, he was appointed an inspector in the postofice department by Postmaster-General D. M. Key, and in charge of a force resided with his family at San Francisco four years. He then returned to Chattanooga, but removed to Washington, D. C., to fill the appointment of chief inspector of the United States. He resigned this position in September, 1885, and again returning to his old home in Chattanooga was, the month following, elected mayor of the city to serve two years. Mr. Sharp is one of the Republican leaders of Tennessee. C. E. Shelton, farmer of the Fifteenth District, is the youngest of five children born to C. E. and Sarah (Williams) Shelton. The father was born about 1788, probably in Virginia, and moved to Rhea County about 1820. He was an officer in the Creek Indian war, serving nearly two years. He was sheriff of Rhea County one term and also trustee for two terms. He served one term as county surveyor, and was justice of the peace of his district for twelve years. He was one of Rhea County’s most prominent citizens, and was highly respected by all. He died in 1833, The mother was born in Virginia in 1790, and moved to Granger County, Tenn., where she married. ‘She died in 1862. Our subject was born in Rhea County, Tenn., in 1822, and moved to Hamilton County in 1849, settling near where he now resides. He received his education in the subscription schools of Rhea and Hamilton Counties. He took charge of his mother’s farm and supported her after he became twenty years of age. In December, 1846, he married Miss Nancy Walker, daughter of William and Rachel Walker, the first settlers of Bledsoe County, Tenn. Mrs. Shelton was born in 1829 in Bledsoe County, and to her and Mr. Shelton were born ten children: Matilda (deceased), Azariah (now trustee of Hamilton County for the second term), William, Martha (Mrs. Selcer), Mira (deceased), Sallie (Mrs. Fryar), Tennessee (deceased), Mary A., McKinney and Jane. Mr. and Mrs. Shelton and all their chil-ees ER ae Sheet on a . cS —< “- Berg enpaetiesaaun. — aes Vai 4 SS eee ee meee Paar ern ranean RL a at wht = . a ; c _ Fae ot bs tag teow em eS ge . < ee eee Then wae oe RES = aye argiegnenien eee on A in eam gigi ~ aeth oF — ASU REREREREPEC HENNE oo Seay niet nats sce aa geo a gee me Rt ee eer ee ae eee : ae a ee é ‘ peti: eee ee seeeeeentis ——- saan reese eecneaiettticidlinaa a 992 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. dren but one, are members of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, of which Mr. Shelton has been elder for ten years. He was reared a Whig, and is now a Republican in politics. He is alsoa Master Mason. Hewas elected justice of the peace in 1853, served one term, and was elected again in 1877. He was deputy sheriff of Hamilton County two years. He has a fine farm of 240 aeres in one tract, and 340 acres about two miles from where he resides, both well cultivated. Mr. Shelton’s father- -n-law, Mr. William Walker, was trustee of Bledsoe County for twelve years, was highly respected, and an influential citizen. His wife was of Dutch descent, as were also Mr. and Mrs. Shelton, Sr. Our subject has always been ready and willing to aid in the advancement of educational interests in his neighborhood, being one of the five who furnished the greatest bulk of funds required in building the academy near his resi- dence. Azariah Shelton, the present efficient trustee of Hamilton County, is descended from one of the old pioneer families of the State. Heisa native of the county in which he now resides, and was born on the 24th of January, 1850. His early education was quité limited, the ordi- nary three months’ country schooling being all the advantages accorded him but with the energy and perseverance characteristic of the subject of this sketch, managed to acquire more than an average education, which he has in later years steadily improved. When quite young he was appren- ticed to a blacksmith, which trade he fully mastered, but this occupation was abandoned for that of the teacher’s profession. He soon took the lead in his chosen profession, and in a creditably short time was elected to the office of county superintendent of public instruction on the first day of Jannary, 1878, entered upon his second term in 1880, and in August, 1882. was elected trustee and tax collector for his native county, and is at present serving his third term. As a business man Mr. Shelton has no superior, and enjoys an enviable reputation throughout the State, and the State accounting officers are loud in their praises of his method of conducting the business of his office, and is exceedingly popular with all who enjoy an acquaintance with him. When but eighteen years old, August 27, 1868, he formed a happy union with Miss Hattie A. Carper, a native of Hamilton County, and by her is the father of one son and four daughters. He is:a leading member of this county in the Masonic and Odd Fellow fraternities. Q. GC. Shelton, manufacturer of flour and meal, and dealer in grain and feed, is a native of Jackson County, Ala., where he was reared and. educated. He resided in that locality until 1871, when he came to Chatta- nooga and embarked in the grocery trade, at which he continued untilHAMILTON COUNTY. 993 1876, when he built and began the operation of his present mills, situ- ated at 136, 138 and 140 Market Street. He is doing a large business, manufacturing about 150 barrels of flour per day, and for this he finds a ready wholesale market in Tennessee, Alabama and Georgia principally. Mr. Shelton is a member of the board of trade of Chattanooga, and is one of the city’s most respected and enterprising citizens. In 1866 he united in marriage with Miss Mary J. Baker, a native of the same county as himself, and to their union two sons and one daughter (deceased) have been born: George M. and Clement Lee. The parents of the subject of this sketch, Shepherd and Rose (Chapman) Shelton, were natives of the Old Dominion; were reared in North Carolina, from where they removed to Middle Tennessee, thence to Jackson County, Ala., where they followed farming until their respective deaths in 1875 and 1885. G. M. Sherwood was born July 14, 1839, in New York, and is the eighth of nine children born to Amos and Mary (Campbell) Sherwood. They were of English and Scotch descent, respectively. The father was born in 1802 in Connecticut, and moved to the suburbs of Syracuse, N. Y., when a young man. He was quite a prominent man of the locality where he resided, taking part in all questions pertaining to the public interest. He died in the year 1858. The mother was born in Onondaga County, N. Y., in the year 1804, and was a member and an active worker in the Presbyterian Church. She died in the year 1867. Our subject received his education principally at Onondaga Academy; began business for himself at the age of eighteen, and in 1862 married Miss Fannie Butts, daughter of Nelson and Prudence Butts, who were old and promi- nent citizens of Onondaga County, N. Y. Mr. Sherwood had the mis- fortune to lose his wife in 1862, and in 1866 he married Miss Sarah M. Woodbury, a daughter of Francis and Maria P. Woodbury. ‘To this union were born five children: Mary C., George W., Clara, Juliet and Edward Marshall. After marriage our subject engaged in the boot and shoe business in Jackson, Mich., where he moved in the year 1864, the style of the firm being Sherwood Bros. He sold his stock of boots and shoes, and came to Chattanooga in April, 1870, where he engaged in the same business for six years. He was elected city recorder, serving in that capacity for four years; he was out one year and then was re-elected and served one year. He was a member of the county court about seven years, after which he moved out to Mission Ridge, purchased 80 acres of land, and since then has engaged extensively in buying and selling real estate. Myr. Sherwood is a Republican in politics. His brother, Harvey C. Sherwood, has been a member of the State eS er er\y ‘ ’ ; SE ge ETT NET EE cee 2 eae AIRE IN “ ee SA I he: wow iad 5 a en pee pana ee ee soi ee NT a ee ~ aapiaaseemn ances ae * ete: - = mee rsp haenrersee elie oe iden - fags snide ee penne once ae Soke . I were 994 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. Senate of Michigan, and was a Democratic candidate of the Fourth Dis- trict for Congress, but was defeated by a prominent Republican. Although the district was strongly Republican, he led his competitor a hot chase. Mr. and Mrs. Sherwood are members of the Second Presby- terian Church of Chattanooga, of which Mr. Sherwood is an elder. P. D. Sims, M.’D., is a native of Jackson County, Tenn., and one of Gye children, three of whom are living, born to the marriage of Martin and Nancy (Smith) Sims. They were married in Jackson County, Tenn., and the father has followed agricultural pursuits all his life. He is still and is eighty-seven years of age. The mother’s parents came from Scotland and settled in North Carolina, but later moved to ‘Tennes- see. She died in 1851. Our subject was born October 22, 1828, was reared on a farm and educated in Alpine Institute, private school. After taking some private instruction in professional studies he graduated from the medical department of the University of Nashville in 1856. The same year he came to Chattanooga, where he has remained ever living since, passing through the several epidemics. He is a member of the county and state medical societies and also of the American Medical Association. He was at one time mayor of Chattanooga. Six children, three of whom are living, were born to his union with Miss Mary Ran- dall in 1857. She was a native of Middle Tennessee, a member of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, and died in 1879. Dr. Sims is also a member of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, a Royal Arch Mason, and has practiced his profession for thirty-one years. F. W. Skillern, M. D., is a native of Bledsoe County, born July 19, 1851, a graduate of Sequatchie College in 1868, and also a graduate of the medical department of Vanderbilt University in 1876. ‘The follow- ing year he moved to Texas, where he remained until 1883, and then returned to Tennessee: In 1875 he married Miss Alice Williams, a native of Tennessee, but reared in Texas. ‘Two children were the result of this union: Mattie J. and Willie Maud. Mrs. Skillern is a consistent mem- ber of the Methodist Episcopal Church South. In 1886 Dr. Skillern located in Chattanooga. He is a Mason, Knight of Pythias, and for twelve years has been engaged in the practice of his profession. He 1s the son of William and Martha (Farrar) Skillern. The father was born in Bledsoe County, Tenn., and his ancestors came from the Emerald Isle. The mother was born in Bath County, Va. She descended from an old English family. After their marriage they settled in Rhea County, Tenn., where the father was quite an extensive stock trader. The mother died in 1865, after which the father married Miss SarahHAMILTON COUNTY. 995 Henninger; he is still living. To his first marriage were born four chil- dren—two sons and two daughters and to his last union only one child was born. J. P. Smartt, senior member of the firm of Smartt Bros. & Co., whole- sale boot and shoe dealers, was'’born in.-Warren County, Tenn., in 1844, His parents, George M. and Anna (Waterhouse) Smartt, were natives of Tennessee. ‘The father was a farmer, and a man who took an active interest in the welfare of his community. In 1857 he was sent by the people of his county to represent them in the General Assembly. In 1871 the mother died, but the father is still living. To them were born nine children—four sons and five daughters. After the death of his wife the father was again married, with the result of three children. Our subject was reared on the farm, and educated at McMinnville College, and also at Hannah Highland College. In 1862 he volunteered in Com- pany CO, Sixteenth Tennessee Infantry, Confederate Army, and during three years of service never missed a day. At the cessation of hostilities he returned and taught at Hannah Highland College, where he had received the principal part of his education. In 1868 he went to Nash- ville, where he was engaged respectively in the wholesale drug, boot and shoe and hat business. In 1875 he came to Chattanooga, and has since been a prominent factor in the business progress of the city. In 1879 Rowena Kennedy, of Chattanooga, became his wife, and the fruits of this union were three children—two sons and one daughter. Mr. Smartt is director, and formerly vice-president of the Third National Bank; is director of Mountain City First Marine City Insurance Company; is director and vice-president of the Chattanooga Investment Company ; has been president of the board of trade; is director in the Chattanooga Springs Company, and is a member of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, having been an elder in the same since 1866. Hon. H. J. Springfield, farmer, was born September 19, 1841, in Murray County, Ga., and is the youngest of six children born to Solomon ville County, S. C. The father was born August 15, 1807, and was of English descent. He was a soldier in the Indian war, and assisted in their removal from Georgia. He died March 23, 1842. He was one of the best school teachers of his day and excelled in penmanship. He had the reputation of being the most courageous and muscular man of the State. The mother was born September 15, 1809, and is still living, making her home with her son. Our subject received his education in the common schools of Georgia and in St. Clair County, Ala. He has also a good business education. He lived eighteen years in St. Clair Langston and Catherine (Bradley ) Springfield, both natives of Green- enh - cecpeae err ent ae A ETE AIEEE ANAS LT et AS RR Taree - zens Vogt DoF puso iTie a i es ta Serer ~ fs a ‘ OS ee aoc, nares cna caearbte read pane eae cee tease ite RP ee Sa roa a ee ae mee m8 ao a aR Tet) se senna rst nn eames a np eee ine en es cota TH 2 ren te ee mre oo Wiel BO tp HEIN i A - SE NT Sager ee . SEE tn SA REET | f iy i i >) f ie nae ne. gram neem Rise agree a ha, inc haat a at 7 aT sexe 7 ~ eae SRP GET Anis POLINA oe tee Rip cnn i memento eg ce peace tcn 996 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. County, Ala., and then moved to Chattanooga, after which he went to Chickamauga station and then to I'yner, where he engaged in merchan- dising eight years, the style of the firm being H. J. Springfield & Bro. He was elected sheriff of Hamilton County in 1878, after which his brother took entire control of the business, and in 1880 they sold the entire stock. Our subject was twice elected to the office of sheriff by the people, and, in 1882, after being out of office thirty days, was elected by the county court to fill a vacancy caused by murder. While sheriff he was one of the bravest and most courageous officers ever in Hamilton County. He filled the unexpired term of the sheriff who was murdered by the Taylor brothers, desperadoes, and played a very important part in apprehension and execution of Andy Taylor. He captured John Taylor in the northeastern part of Tennessee, and lodged him in the jail at Chattanooga. He wasa member of the Constitutional Convention in Alabama, in 1867, which effected the reconstruction of and restoration to the Union of Alabama, Georgia and Florida. He was appointed by the State superintendent of registration as a member and chairman of the board of registration in his district. He also represented his dis- trict in the State Legislature of Alabama in 1868-69; was appointed United States marshall by Gen. Grant in 1870, but declined the appointment because of his having previously decided to move to Ten- nessee. December 24, 1861, he married Miss Mary C. Masteller, of St. Clair, Ala., who died in 1864. They had one child, James Henry (deceased). He married his second wife, Miss Joicey L. Simpson, in 1866, and she died the same year. In 1869 he married Miss Mary E. Franklin, of St. Clair County, Ala., and five children have blessd this last union: Willard J., Charles, Almera, Walter M. and Edgar C. Mr. and Mrs. Springfield are members of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and he is a Master Mason. He enlisted in the spring of 1863 in the Federal Army and served as captain. He has been a life-long Repub- lican, casting his first presidential vote for Gen. Grant. N. C. Steele, M. D., is a successful physician of Chattanooga, and the fourth child of a family of seven children born to J. N. and Mary A. Steele, natives respectively of South Carolina and Alabama. At the age ol seven his father left his native State and came to Alabama, where at the age of twenty-nine he married Miss Steele, a native of that State, though not wrelative. Three of their four boysare ministers of the gospel. Our subject was born September 20, 1849, near Athens, Limestone Co., Ala., and at the age of five was taken to Mississippi. Living near Corinth, that State, one of the great military stations of the war, and in the vicin- ity of the famous battles of Corinth and Shiloh, his father’s fortune wasee Ee HAMILTON COUNTY. 997 almost totally swept away. This and the impaired condition of his health seriously interfered with his studies, but at the age of twenty-one he began the study of medicine under Dr. J. M. Taylor, of Corinth, one of the most prominent physicians of Mississippi. After studying there a year he took one course of lectures in the medical department of the University of Louisville, Ky., and a second course in the medical depart- ment of the University of Nashville, from which latter institution he oraduated with honor, in February, 1873, having taken the prize for the best thesis on “The Action of Quinine,” and divided the prize for stand- ing the best examination on the principles and practice of surgery. After practicing in Mississippi for thirteen years he went to Europe in 1886, to make a special study of the diseases of the eye, ear and nose, to which he had for several years been devoting much attention. In that year he was a highly endorsed and strong applicant for the chair of eye and ear in the medical department of the University of Nashville and Vanderbilt University, made vacant by the death of Prof. V. S. Lindsley. On returning from Europe, wishing a large city in which to practice his specialties, he removed to Chattanooga in the latter part of 1886; in 1875 Miss Frances E. Jones, of Mississippi, became his wife. To them go: Mary T. and Will- ard H. Both he and wife are members of the Cumberland Presbyterian have been born three children, two of whom are livin Church, he being a ruling elder in that church. The Doctor is an hon- orary member of the Mississippi State Medical Society, a member of the Tri-State Medical Association of Mississippi, Arkansas and Tennessee, and of the Chattanooga Medical Society. In 1884 he graduated from the Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle. He is a Mason, a good citizen, a total abstainer from all intoxicating liquors, and a Prohibitionist. Theodore F. Stewart, of Chattanooga, was born in Atkins County, Ohio, March 12, 1846, and is the son of Hiram Stewart, of that State. Our subject was reared under the parental roof, and educated in his native State. In 1861 he enlisted in the Thirty-ninth Regiment Ohio Volunteer Infantry, United States Army, and gave four years’ service to his country’s cause. In March, 1866, he came to Chattanooga, and accepted a position as teller in the First National Bank, where he con- tinued eighteen, years. Failing health obliged him to abandon this sedentary employment, and he then engaged in the insurance business until 1887. Mr. Stewart has been prominently identified with various manufactories in Chattanooga, and was secretary and treasurer of Look- out ice factory, also a director in the wood and dish factory. He was connected with the cotton-mills, and with Mr. Blair operated a roller corn meal mill (roller process) one year, during 1886. He is at present ee ELT EEE IR i SO TE EO. ETS FSR RR eresag £ > cna wigs 8a walt al a et iAh SO ee ae oe Naa oI oe pe ete Ho ov ts Pe ape oe aay Se ord santas ouster vache — aetna as mn ea te aimee or oem . Hees | Shit Gee | yt ; De aE BEA N if i ase eli Ey i i tj tae ig ean i Pua ae wt ary i ied ote AF ‘! ves eu iad eae (a eet eh ay iL} ae : a i { ft ; Teal| 4 Skee to GS LES ee) ee o~ ~ Seger oo peace ate seco cit EMR il maaan ements. appre ps4 wena ai Se SSeS eS => ne eee aeons aceon emer aan S SND mre A = RS snes SNR - See — aor es aioe eo SS Ee aaa Sena a SERN EN ae eens ant cieeiern erea I98 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. director in the First National Bank. the real estate business, to which he is now giving most of his attention. November 1, 1870, he married Miss Celia M. Shaffer, of Delaware, Ohio, Mr. Stewart is a Republican in In January, 1887, he engaged in who bore him one child, Bessie M. politics, a member of the G. A. R., and the Methodist Episcopal Church. Arthur G. Stivers, of the firm of Loomis, Hart & Co., was born in Meigs County, Ohio, September 23, 1855, and is the son of Washington and Caroline (Fisher) Stivers, natives respectively of New York and Ohio. received his education in the schools of his native State. Our subject was reared to manhood in his native county, and He came South in 1875, and located at Chattanooga, where he has been connected with the firm of Loomis, Hart & Co. ever since. He has charge of the office at 115 and 117 West Eighth Street, also has charge of the sash, May 8, 18838, he was united in marriage to Miss Fannie Pickens, of Racine, Ohio, who bore door and blind departments at the above numbers. him one son. Mr. Stivers is a Republican in politics, a Knight Templar, The firm of Loomis, Hart & Co. is individually composed of J. F. Loomis, John A. Hart, James T. Arnold, F. L. Winchester, A. J. Gohagan and A. G. Stivers. and F. J. Bennett who conducted the saw mill and lumber business at the foot of Pine and Cedar Streets until 1875. Mr. Bennett. The firm of Loomis & Hart inaugurated the manufacture of furniture, which they continued until 1884, when the present com- The mill works cover sixteen acres of ground on the bank of the Tennessee River, and at the foot of Pine and Cedar Streets. and a Mason. being High Priest of Hamilton Chapter of this city. The business was established in 1866 by J. F. Loomis John A. Hart succeeded pany became proprietors. and In 1887 they erected a large, three-story frame warehouse at the corner of Pine and Water Streets. this building are 60x180 feet. The up-town office and large sash, door and blind warehouse is situated at 115 and 117 West Kighth Street. They employ on an average 150 men, and the business will approximate $200,000 per year. They saw and handle about 12,000,000 feet of lum- ber per year. The dimensions of M. E. Stone, merchant and postmaster at Divine, Tenn., was born July 3, 1850, in Chattooga County, Ga., and is the second of seven chil- dren born to William and Annie (Junkins) Stone. The father was born in North Carolina about 1823, and was captain of the State militia of the district in which he resided. He taught school and has been bailiff of the county for two terms. The mother was born about 1832 in South Carolina, and her parents were J. W. and Annie Junkins, who came from Ireland to South Carolina about 1520, settling in Franklin County,HAMILTON COUNTY. 999: where Mrs. Stone was born. She died in 1865. Mr. and Mrs. Stone were active Christian workers in the church since early in lite. Mr. Stone has always been a member of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and Mrs. Stone first joined the Cumberland Presbyterian Church but after marriage joined the Methodist Episcopal Church. Mr. Stone is a licensed minister in the church, and has served the organization to which he belongs as a class leader and in other capacities for some time. He is of German and Holland descent. Our subject received his education in the Chattooga County common schools principally. He assisted his father on the farm until nineteen years Of age, when he was thrown upon his own resources. Mr. Stone is a very promising young man. He followed farming until 1880, when he engaged in business at his present location. One year from that date, there being need of a post- office at this place, Mr. Stone was commissioned to fill the position of post- master under Thomas L. James, the postmaster-general at that time. Mr. Stone commenced life in very limited circumstances, but by energy and enterprise he has succeeded in a very ereditable manner. He has as fine a stock of goods as is to be found in any country store. He built the first store in this locality, and has increased his business until his sales amount to $9,000 per yeat. He is a Democrat in politics, casting his first presidential vote for Horatio Seymour. Besides his store build- ing and stock of goods Mr. Stone owns five acres of land, two anda half miles from the corporation limits of Chattanooga, and is a valuable piece of property. His grandfather, Stone, was a very prominent citizen of the German Government before immigrating to this country. Stoops & Brown, proprietors of the popular Natural Bridge Hotel on Lookout Mountain, took charge of the same in 1885. The grounds belonging to the hotel comprise fourteen acres 0D which is the Natural Bridge, Telephone Rock and numerous other attractions. There are also several fine springs of both free-stone and chalybeate water. The associa- tion of spiritualists purchased the property in 1881 for @7.000. The hotel as 1t 1s NOW improved and arranged contains forty-five rooms. lal, 1a; Stoops is a native of Hamilton County, Ohio, came to Chattanooga in ° 1871, and was connected with the Florentine Hotel from 1876 until he became interested in the management of the Natural Bridge Hotel. He was also treasurer of the Chattanooga Opera House Company, from 1879 to 1886, and during the latter year was postmaster of Lookout postofiice. His parents, A. J. and Nannie A. (Cox) Stoops, are natives of Pennsylvania and Franklin County, Ind., they are now residing in Chattanooga, the father following the occupation of a contractor. JEONG Brown is a native of Washington County, Tenn., where he was reared A - - Sot i " PY oT St r ERT TN ET SEES nt ee hu i es EN RAN ee co}.Sy ea ear a , HE = AR ea ae a ee i agar 5, er earn gienemans a grat tog pert and eee a NESE sna + ie SRR neem otra ‘4 ‘ t q i ‘ ¥ ; rt} ae 1 ¥ eat Ht OTL IT IT TIE EOE ere: care cemsifititn aome pind eien. - sii Se ciangnibeitabaaabtabaiae aay... oe : mse see nee eae _ hela ih : shenrgunttnindieceabaenmensamereneeeeeie eee Piha? alaapinhisinaeligeiatian ten naar eemaames : : . = -. —_ one Stee a os ee one - aero ie a SS ——_ i“ - a —— ST eer goer tea - c - Se ii ee ee ee 2 na - ee i — Spee —_ oe alacant - erm S ra - prema nee eke mer Moony Pe eeseas ‘ ss . see . nepmceenenais me ne . = ~ ¥ atime SS - - s sais ae = - ei = = Senne = = SERIES Sr on og TT Tg Lee Se ere ee — 7 = a * x was s - Ppa a ee Pie wae ——— "7 - E 5 — re oe aie — ae a “ss PRL “noe “ sina > eave eiee capa" owen Seen nna eer ee ~ ‘ aes es - ” : _ rym aaa bi st Se ‘ se AF St . a ~— Sse Faden Tae : nee ES ; ec = Sar ae eae ae are 3 - - -——- a = et SAE te ~- - -— es omnes 1000 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. and educated. He came to Chattanooga in 1878, and was also connected with the Florentine Hotel until he and Mr. Stoops took charge of their present hotel. In 1885 he married Miss Nettie Stoops a native of Covington, Ky. James F. Brown, father of J. N., was born in Wash- ington County, Tenn., and died in the same county in 1863. Margaret (Harvey) Brown, the mother, is also a native of Washington County, Tenn., of Irish descent, and now resides in Jonesboro, Tenn. Berry Talley, a farmer in the Fifth District, was born in South Carolina in 1827, and moved to Georgia with his parents in 1832, in which State he lived twenty-six years. He then moved to Hamilton County, in 1856, locating where he has since resided. He is the youngest of six children born to Stephen and Polly ( Pool) Talley. The father was born in North Carolina in 1788. While living in Georgia he was coroner for one term. He died in 1872. He was a soldier in the war of 1812 under Gen. Jackson, and was a genial good man. The mother was born in 1803 in South Carolina, and died about 1829. Our subject began business for himself at the age of seventeen, and was fifty years old before he learned to write his name, with very little means at his com- mand, he now owns 107 acres of land well cultivated, on the Bird Mill road. He married Mrs. Ellender Langston, formerly Miss Gay, and six children blessed this union: Stephen ( deceased ), Mary (Mrs. Petty), Nancy (Mrs. Biggs), John, William (deceased ) and an infant ( deceased ). Mrs. Talley died in 1862, and in 1863 Mr. Talley married Miss Celina Olliver, who presented him with one child: Kesiah (Mrs. Lee). Mrs. Talley died in 1874, and he then married Miss Martha Wright, who bore him seven children: Alice, Tennessee (Mrs. McDowel), Berry, Margaret and three infants deceased Mrs. Talley departed this life in 1879, and in 1881 he married Mrs. Betters. formerly Miss Lee, by whom he had two children, only one living, Thomas Wesley. Mr. and Mrs. Talley are members of the Baptist Chure h in which he is a deacon. In polities Mr. Talley was a Democ rat before the war, but since that event has been conservative, voting for principal instead of party. Mr. William Talley, the eldest brother of our subject, is living with him at the present time. He ( William ) assisted in collecting the Indians from the surrounding country for removal to the Indian Territory. served asa soldier in the Creek Indian war. second cotton-gin ever put up in H has taken a decided interest in all public improvements. Henry F. Temple, of Chattanooga, was born in Winem, Is YC. September 14, 1840, son of John F. and Cornelia ( Morris) Temple, natives respectively of Germany and New York. In 1852 Henry F. T'wo years before he Our subject owned the amilton County, and is a man whoHAMILTON COUNTY. LOOL. removed with his parents to Chicago, and in 1861 enlisted in the Federal Army, serving in the Twenty-first Kentucky Regiment, first as private, and through all the grades to captain of Company D., and adjutant-gen- eral on the staff of Gen. W. C. Whitaker. After the war he was. engaged in the manufacture of pumps in Chicago for some time, but came to Chattanooga in January, 1874, and engaged in his present business viz.. the manufacture of furniture, pumps, pipe and lumber. He is also vice-president and general manager of the Lookout Incline Railway Company. He has also been prominently identified with other enter- prises in Chattanooga real estate, etc. January 28, 1868, he married Sarah A. Egan, of Chicago, who bore him seven children—five sons and two daughters. Mr. Temple is a Democrat, and was mayor of Chattanooga in 1879 and 1880. He is a member of the G. A. R., and is an excellent citizen. Joseph F. Shipp was born in Jasper County, Ga., February 3, 1844. and isa son of Gustavus V. and Caroline (George) Shipp, natives respectively of North Carolina and Georgia. Joseph F. was reared and educated in his native State, and in 1861 enlisted in the Confederate Army, serving with the Fourth Georgia Regiment two years. He then served in the transportation department until the close of hostilities, when he followed the mercantile business in Social Circle, Ga., until 1873, when he and Maj. Temple established the present business 1D Chattanooga. He has also been largely engaged in real estate trans- actions in Chattanooga. August 12, 1866, he married Lillie E. Eckles of Walton County, Ga., who bore him nine children—six sons and three daughters. He isa Democrat, and has served on the board of mayor and aldermen. He was the Democratic candidate for mayor in 18838, and is a member of the city school board. He is also commander of N. B. Forrest’s camp of Confederate Veterans. Singularly enough the firm of Temple & Shipp is composed of an ex-Federal soldier and an ex-Con- federate soldier, each having faithfully served the cause he deemed right. They dwell in harmony together notwithstanding this fact and are reasonably prosperous. Ww. G. M. Thomas, attorney and counsellor at law, a member of the firm of DeWitt & Thomas, situated in the McConnell Block, is a native of London, Canada, and 1s a son of William and Grace (Keiler) Thomas, who were natives of England and Canada respectively, and who are now residents of Spring City, Rhea Co., Tenn. At the age of three years the subject of this sketch became a resident of Tennessee by reason of the removal of his parents to Bledsoe County, and he was there reared to manhood and received his early education. He afterward entered _— —— ET TS ee ¥+ BS ST So aS ENT a ggg : a , om te SERS CREE Dae U Rene ee aen H ane ———— obas eee a tt RE Re nce a Be a ~ - Ta = seen ee i e ve : 5 7% i - * E pal fone -- . = ie perme ore ona vehenated ye a em = etme ye chm eee tH | | Hd 3 a {i f ii fa ee acon _ Ree ena Set SSE - na ag met tals i ee i So ——— + = Se Se OP oe 3 aaa eee te 1002 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. Vanderbilt University, studied law, was admitted to the bar in 1882 and then came to Chattanooga, where he has since resided practicing his profession. He was first connected with the firm of DeW itt, Shepherd & Thomas, then accepted the position of attorney for the Cincinnati SerithernRaiiroad 1884, when the present firm of DeWitt = rT ~ AO 7 —~ ry 7 ; 7 ~ - cr y * & Thomas was organized. Mr. Thomas is one of the city’s most pro- gressive citizens, is a first class lawyer and is a member of the local DeWitt & Thomas are attorneys for Ham- until lodge of Knights of Pythias. ilton County, Tenn. A. J. Thomas, a retired farmer, at Hixon, was born March 10. 1825, in Bledsoe County, and came to Hamilton County in 1833, settling first at Georgetown. He has been living at or near Hixon since 1854. He is the sixth of nine children born to Abraham and Sarah (Kosy ) Thomas. and came to He after- ward moved to Hamilton County, and here died, December, 28. 1859. The father was born in Virginia December 20, 1789. Sequatchie Valley at a very early period, where he married. He was a soldier in the war of 1812. and was discharged at Mobile. at the close of the war. The mother was born in Marion County, and died September 7, 1846. Our subject received his education at the subscription schools of Hamilton County. She was of English descent. He lived with and assisted his father on the farm until his twenty-ninth year, when he married Miss Louisa Gann, a native of Hamilton County, born in 1834, the daughter of Preston and Mary Gann, who were of Irish and Dutch extraction respectively. To our subject and wife were Sarah (Mrs. Barker), Mary (Mrs. Powell), (deceased), Matilda (Mrs. Dr. W. F. Skillern), William (deceased), George and Florence (deceased ). Mrs. Thomas is a member of the Methodist Episcopal Church. Mr. Thomas is a Democrat in polities although in early life he voted with the Whig party. He is a member of the Masonie fraternity. He was elected justice of the peace in 1865, and served in that capacity with universal satisfaction until 1871. born eight children: Martha (deceased), James A. Not one of his decisions was ever reversed. The grandfather of our subject, John Thomas, was a soldier in the Rey- olutionary war, and shortly after being discharged moved his family into the Sequatchie Valley. Hon. D. C. Trewhitt, judge of the circuit court, is a native of Morgan County, Tenn., born in 1823. In the year 1836 he moved to Cleveland, Tenn., where he was reared and educated. He was admitted to the bar in that city in 1848, and four years later he moved to Harrison. Hamil- ton Co. (now in James County), Tenn. He was a member of the Legisla- ture in 1859 and 1860, and was elected to the Senate in 1861 but resigned ;HAMILTON COUNTY. 1008 went to Kentucky and enlisted in the First Tennessee Infantry, where, at the time of his resignation, in March, 1862, he occupied a prominent position in the army. From the above date until the close of the war he was chancellor of this district, and then practiced law until elected to his present position in the year 1878. July 4, 1865, he was united in marriage to Miss Mary M. Hunter, a native of Hamilton County. This union resulted in the birth of four children. Levi and Harriet (Laven- der ) Trewhitt, the parents of our subject were natives of North Carolina, where they died in the years 1862 and 1855 respectively. Francis E. Tyler was born in Ireland July 13, 1838, and came with his parents to the United States in 1849. He was reared and educated in Pittsburgh, Penn., and was in the employ of a wholesale grocery in that city a number of years, and also in the employ of the Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railroad eight years. In 1861 he enlisted in the Union Army and served first as second lieutenant but was afterward promoted to the rank of lieutenant-colonel of the Seventy-fourth New York Regiment. He came South in 1870 and was paymaster and book- keeper with the Roane Iron Company for five years. In 1876 he engaged in the general insurance agency business, which he has continued up to the present, representing a sreat many well known fire insurance compa- nies. Mr. Tyler is secretary and treasurer of the Mutual Real Estate and Home Building Association of Chattanooga. He is notary public and magistrate of the Fourteenth District, and president of the Chatta- nooga Board of Underwriters. December 25, 1865, he married Mary F. Fleeson, of Pittsburgh, Penn., and to them were born six children, all living. Mr. Tyler is a Republican in politics, is Past Grand of the local lodge of the L 0.0. F., and Past Chancellor of Damon Lodge, No. 2, IK. of P., also a member of the military order of Loyal Legion (Cincinnati, Ohio, Commandery ), also of the G. A. R., Lookout Post, No. 2, of this city, and a member of the Second Presbyterian Ghureh. The above mentioned Mutual Real Estate and Home Building Association, of which Mr. Tyler is secretary and treasurer was incorporated in September, 1885, has a capital of $200,000, with R. M. Barton, Jr., president, and F. H. Tyler, secretary and treasurer. The board of directors are R. M. Barton, H. M. Ward, F. E. Tyler, R. Whigham, A. 8. Ochs, W. Heron, L. O. Read, H. G. Beck and C. E. Smith. This company own and buy large tracts of property in and about the city which they lay off in lots and sell on eight years’ terms, 10 per cent cash and $12 per $1,000 monthly rental. They also build residences on lots on same terms, thus offering unequaled -nducements to laboring men. This is the only company of the kind in the Southern States. OEa ( a ii bO torn rei 7 Seo ~_ 3 ee eee ga ssa pe at fieham oro eal SE tae lk z 7 PIR = SSA AE = ¥ 1004 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. Troutt & Coxon (firm), dealers in marble furniture slabs, and manu- facturers of monuments and general cemetery work, was established in Sep- tember, 1885. They employ two traveling salesmen and seventy-five work hands, and have a flourishing business. They use both foreign and domes- tic mabe and granite. John Troutt was born in the Keystone State in 1843 and grew to manhood there. He followed masonry and stone cut- ting until 1868, after which he followed the same trade in Montana, Utah, Arkansas and Texas, until he came to Chattanooga in 1878. He was then a member of the firm of Renwick & Troutt, masonry contractors, and re- mained such until the death of his partner in January, 1885. He then continued alone until the present firm was formed. His parents, Daniel and Mary (Loudmilish) Troutt, were natives of Pennsylvania, where they died in 1851 and 1854 respectively. Our subject, John Troutt, i S amem- ber of the K. of H., anda genial, pleasant citizen. William Coxon is a native of Montreal, Canada, born in 1849. and came to New York in infancy where he was reared and educated. In 1873 he moved to South Carolina, where he remained one year, then went to Washington, D. C., and from there to Chattanooga in 1875. He has always followed the stone cutters’ trade. In 1878 he married Miss Jennie Morgan, a native of Illinois. Mr. Coxon is a member of the Masonic fraternity and an excellent business man. His parents, James and Susan (Watts) Coxon, are natives of England. They came to Canada in childhood, wer ried there, and in 1849 moved to New York, wl Benjamin T e mar- 1ere they still reside, ruxal was born in Westmoreland County, Penn., March 22. 1842, and is a son of Henry and Elizabeth (Searly) Truxal, both natives of Pennsylvania. Our subject was reared and educated in that State, learning the machinist’s trade in Pittsburg, Penn. In 1869 he enlisted in Company L, One Hundred and Second Pennsylvania Volunteer Infantry as private, was se riously wounded in the left shoulder in front of Petersburg, June 18, 1864, and disabled for further service. He came to Chattanooga in 1870, and established what is now the Enterprise Machine Works. In 1870 he married Miss Mary Locke, of Pennsyl- vania, who presented him with one child—a daughter named Eva, My. Truxal is a Republican, a Mason, and a Knight of Pythias. Ambrose Wagner was born in Baltimore, Md., October 2, 1856, and is the son of John M. and Mary A. ( Kirshuer ) Wagner, both of whom were natives of Bavaria. Our Subject was reared and received a fair education in the city of Baltimore, where he also learned the pattern and model making trade. At the age of twenty-one, he left his native State, came to Tennessee. and located in Chattanooga where he worked at his trade one year. In June, 1878, he established his present foundryHAMILTON COUNTY. 1005 machine shops (a sketch of which appears elsewhere in this work). The January previous, of the same year, he was united in marriage to Miss Annie M. Zinkand, of Baltimore, Md., and to them one daughter, Agnes (deceased) was born. Mr. Wagner is a Democrat, a member of the Catholic Knights of America and of the Catholic Church, and is one of the enterprising and reliable business men and manufacturers of Chat- tanooga. Dr. Leonard Walden is a son of Bishop J. M. and Martha (Young) Walden, both of whom were born and reared in Ohio. Of their family of five children our subject was the eldest. He was born April 20, 1860, at Lynchburg, Ohio, and received his literary education at Cincinnati and Delaware, Ohio. In 1884 he graduated from the Ohio Medical College. After practicing a short time in Covington, Ky., he came to Chattanooga, and in less than a year was elected city physician. He was connected with the board of health, is a member of the Sons of Temperance and other secret orders. He is a very successful practi- tioner. His father, Bishop J. M. Walden, was born in Lebanon, Ohio, on afarm. He received his literary education at Farmer’s College, College Hill, Ohio, and graduated at the age of twenty-one. He was a corre- spondent of the Commercial Gazette, Cincinnati, Ohio, and during the year 1853 started a paper in Illinois, but this proved a failure. In 1855 he left Llinois and moved to Kansas, where he started a paper, but this also proved a failure. He was elected to the office of commissioner of education of that State in 1856, and in 1858 he returned to Ohio and entered the Cincinnati Conference. His first circuit was near Cincinnati. He afterward went to Lynchburg, Ohio, where he was stationed three years and was then sent to Cincinnati. He was connected with the Freedmen’s Bureau until 1868, when he was elected junior member of the Methodist Book Concern. In 1880 he was elected senior member of the same, and in 1884 was elected bishop. Dr. R. F. Wallace is a son of John and Rose (Lamar) Wallace, both natives of Anderson County, Tenn., where they are now living, the father engaged in agricultural pursuits. In their family were nine children— six sons and three daughters. Two of the sons are physicians. Our subject was born in the same county as his parents, February 12, 1859, and was the sixth child. He attended college in Jefferson County, where he received a good education. Having read medicine with Dr. J. P. Wallace, he took a course at the medical department of the University of Tennessee where he graduated in 1886, receiving the first prize, faculty medal, for general proficiency. Isaac A. Wallace, farmer, was born in December, 1841, in the Twelfth 63 — wou S PE, Pi LOS SS. ONS eer #. . ~ * QPS RRA SCE PRE TIES? ee oH re oe | Tgfe stati EE EI | F é | i & eae ee rae aS CREA aie tery ins eens ak laeey RRO TIT TONS Cor fa Se: Rn ki mate i | ss wtiatlagtiels ae SRT: aa See Og, nich RA RATT. ica li aegis alta ee Seni Rig, A ROLE LEE TT TTT > page ea et see = y ei Ts aeinieerenneamae nana aia acaineetanatny SS ee - - r “ on . pro -t * 29 i. rs = ~ ie er em peer ag eee at mes henselae ae sl le BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. 1008 1866. In 1868 he attended a course of lectures at Louisville, Ky. In 1869 he was at McMinnville and went to Beersheba Springs, where he completed his studies in the Latin language under a private instructor; he then traveled one year. While engaged in the life insurance business, in 1871, he married Margaret Hackwarth, daughter of Jasper Hackwarth, of Marion County, and in the fall of the same year, 1871, located near Soddy. Margaret presented him with one child, Thomas Dick. Mrs. Walker died in September, 1880, and in November, 1882, Dr. Walker married M. M. Clift, who was born in 1861. She is a daughter of R. B. Clift, of Hamilton County. This union resulted in the birth of two children—both girls: Sallie (deceased) and Tinque Nay. Dr. Walker is a Democrat, a Master Mason, and in 1880 was appointed notary public, which position he now holds. Mrs.: Walker is a member of the Presbyterian Church at Soddy. Our subject’s father was of English and his mother of Scotch descent. His grandfather, Walker, came from Virginia, settled in Warren County (now Grundy), and was one of the earliest settlers in that region. His father and mother were Baptists. Joseph H. Warner, of Chattanooga, was born in Sumner County, Tenn., September 5, 1842, the son of Jacob L. and Elizabeth J. (Cart- wright) Warner, natives respectively of Virginia and North Carolina. Our subject’s maternal grandfather, James Cartwright, immigrated to Tennessee in 1780, and was one of the pioneer settlers and Indian fight- ers of Middle Tennessee. Our subject was reared and educated in his native county. In 1862 he enlisted in Company A, Nineteenth Tennes- see Regiment Confederate Infantry, serving as private and non-commis- sioned officer until captured at Missionary Ridge, and was held in the Federal prisons until the close of the war. He then engaged as clerk in a wholesale hardware store in Davenport, Iowa, and in the latter part of 1865 he engaged in the business for himself in Nashville. In December, 1866, he removed: to Chattanooga and started his present hardware busi- ness on a limited seale. His trade now extends to Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennesssee and Kentucky. He employs twenty men in the house which is located on the southwest corner of Seventh and Market Streets. It is five stories high, and is acommodious structure. Healso employs five traveling salesmen. Mr. Warner is one of the original founders of the Chattanooga Street Railroad Company, and has been its president for four years. He was one of the organizers of the Third National Bank, and its president some years. June 20, 1867, he mar- ried Miss.Alice G. Hood of Rutherford County, Tenn., and has five liv- ing children by this union—two sons and three daughters. Mr. WarnerHAMILTON COUNTY. 1009 is independent in his political views but has affiliated with the Demo- cratic party. He is a Knight of Pythias. T. C. Warner, D. D., pastor of the Methodist Episcopal Church at Chattanooga, was born December 11, 1843, in Medina County, Ohio. His father, Lorenzo Warner, was a native of Connecticut, and in early life moved to Ohio, where he was educated in Western Reserve College and at Ohio Medical College. For about fifteen years he practiced med- icine and then turned his attention to the ministry, in which he became eminent. He was a representative in the Ohio Legislature, and for seven years was chaplain of the Ohio penitentiary. He was chaplain of the Fourth Ohio Infantry two years during the late war. The mother, Mary O. Kingsbury, was born in New Hampshire, and in girlhood moved to Ohio. The parents were members of the Methodist Episcopal Church, as are also their five children. Our subject received his early education in the common schools, and was well advanced in his course at the Ohio Wesleyan University, when the stirring events of the war put a stop to further study. In 1861 he enlisted in Company ©, Fourth Ohio Infantry, and after serving two years was discharged on account of wounds received at Fredericksburg, Va. He then returned home, and engaged in mercantile pursuits for some time. He entered the ministry in 1866 and for eighteen years was a member of the Northern Ohio Con- ference. In 1884 he was called to Chattanooga,*and under his able management the church has increased rapidly in prosperity and num- bers. While in Ohio Dr. Warren gave public lectures on a variety of subjects. Since coming here the Doctor has thoroughly identified him- self with the interests of the South in helping to solve the social and other difficulties that have arisen. In 1864 he married Miss Frances, daughter of Alex. Laughlin of Ohio, and by her became the father of ten children, seven of whom are living. In 1835 he received the degree of D. D. from Little Rock University. He is a member of the G. A. R., was chaplain of the department of Ohio a year, also of the department of Tennessee and Georgia a year and is now chaplain in chief. He is a member of the executive committee, and trustee of Chattanooga Univer- sity. C. A. Warren (deceased) was a native of London, Canada, born November 7, 1837, and at the age of thirteen moved with his parents to Detroit, Mich. At the age of nineteen he enlisted in the United States naval service, where he continued two years, after which he followed railroading in Michigan two years. He was then in the employ of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad until May, 1867, when he was transferred to the M. & C., serving as conductor for five years.on tt rina “ same alanis ree es ae pet aes ‘ : peice at : = the Me “er a ae Bosh gant oa eae yn ask ae Set aT ee SS “iy py cee te Fina eects ada Sr pment enreas eee oni aaa eet Saree aaa aaa ae ks ET eee sso ee a spi arr nalonemepar ecstni ae a se eens SNE I ae ST ee ee = oer cs = — — - a ee ee reo Se a a mete we EARS ¥ * ~~ ns — Se -- . 2 = ae = SS 2 . =~ sy ane % “ TMS a Se 1010 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. ing 1Sii3dee be accepted the position of passenger and traveling agent for the A. G. S., and after one year was appointed pas- senger and traveling agent for both the A. GG. Ss and Ce ss which position he held until the time of his decease. September 25, 1867, he married Miss Louisa Seaman, a native of Cincinnati, Ohio, after wie they resided one year at Memphis, and then located in Chat- tanooga. Mr. Warren was one of the most popular citizens of Chatta- nooga, and had many warm friends, being loved and respected by all who knew him. He wasa charter member of the K. of P., A. O. U. W. and K. of H. lodges of Chattanooga, each of which, by his death, March 25, 1886, lost a valuable and efficient member. He left but one child, William, aged fifteen. He and his wife were members of the Epis- copal Church, and he departed this life with a full realization of the His parents, William A. and Pauline (Charles) War- The father’s death occured at Detroit, Mrs. Warren is still a resident of Christian hope. ren, were natives of Canada. Mich., where the mother still lives. Chattanooga, but was a resident of Cincinnati, Ohio, up to the time of | Her parents, Joseph C. and Louisa C. (Arnold) Seaman, were natives of Ohio and Kentucky respectively, but resided in Cincin- her marriage. nati the greater part of their lives, the father being engaged in the mer- cantile trade. Their death occurred in 1861 and 1879 respectively. Alfred Webb & Co.. Chattanooga, is individually composed of Alfred Webb and F. I. Stone. The business was established in 1880 by J. M. Wilson, who started on one of the prominent manufacturing firms of He eonducted it one year when Alfred Webb, James Hagie and John McVey purchased his outfit. They conducted the business about four years when the other members of the firm withdrew, leaving Mr. Webb, who conducted it alone for one year. a small scale with all hand tools and a force of six men. In 1886 the present firm became proprietors, and have put in the most improved steam-power tools used in boiler mak- ing. In February, 1887, they completed their present new and elegant works on Cowart and Market Streets. The boiler shop proper being 60x150 feet, and the warehouse being 40x150 feet, is used by Mr. Stone for general wholesale hardware business. The machinery department, which will be conducted by the company, will SauDy, a full line of all kinds of wood and iron making machinery, viz.: engines, boilers, saw mills, ete. They employ on an average Aten men. Their machine agency is superintended by Mr. W. A. L. Kirk, late of Kirk Machine Co., who is an able and efficient manager. Outside of the regular busi- ness they are also building stand pipes extensively for use in Southern States as water works. They are energetic, wide-a-wake business men.HAMILTON COUNTY. 1011 Dr. W. B. Wells, a successful surgeon and practitioner of medicine at Chattanooga, is the son of John and Mary (Stewart) Wells, both natives of South Carolina. They came to Georgia when young, and here passed the remainder of their days. The father followed the occu- pation of afarmer. Of their family of eight children—four sons and four daughters—our subject was the eldest. He was born June 8, 1838, in Habersham County, Ga., and received a good academic education. At the age of twenty-one he began the study of medicine, and took a course in the Atlanta Medical College. During the war he served in the medi- cal department of Hardee’s: corps, Walker’s division and Gist’s brigade. After returning from the war he entered the Atlanta Medical College, and graduated from that institution in 1866. Dr. Wells has practiced his profession for twenty-six years, and twenty of those years were passed in practicing in one locality in Georgia. In 1885 he went to New York, and graduated in the Polyclinic, a school of clinical medicine for graduates from other schools, and afterward came to Chattanooga. He is a member of the Georgia Medical Association and also of the American Medical Association. Four children were the result of his marriage to Miss M. E. Pope in 1867. The Doctor is a Mason and he and his wife are mem- bers of the Missionary Baptist Church as are also his children. Samuel D. Wester, of Chattanooga, was born in Roane County, Tenn., January 10, 1849, son of Christopher C. and Mary (Johnson) Wester, both natives of Roane County, Tenn., and members of pioneer families of East Tennessee. Our subject was educated at Wesleyan University (now Grant Memorial), Athens, McMinn Co., Tenn. He came to Chat- tanooga in 1877 and engaged in the grain business, in company with Mr. William M. Nixon, which he has continued up to the present time. He married Miss Lelia-A. Rice, of McMinn County, Tenn., and three children » are the fruits of this union. Mr. Wester is a Republican, a member and trustee in the First Methodist Episcopal Church of Chattanooga, and trustee in the Chattanooga University. F. O. Wert, attorney and counsellor at law, isa native of the State of Alabama, where he was reared and educated. He is a son of M. and E. C. (Cowen) Wert, who were natives respectively of Harrisburg, Penn., and Alabama. They are yet living and are now residing in the latter State. After acquiring his literary education, the subject of this biog- raphy studied law and was admitted to practice his chosen profession at Decatur, Ala., where he continued until the fall of 1880, when he removed to Chattanooga which has since been his home. He takes an active interest in all public matters, and is deservedly popular because of his enterprise and liberality. He is the present Vice-chancellor of the local1012 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. lodge of K. P. In 1882, the solemnization of his marriage with Miss Lucy Crow occurred, and to them two children have been born: Aubin and Louise. Mr. Wert and wife are members of the Methodist Episcopal Church. Xenophon Wheeler, senior member of the law firm of Wheeler & Marshall, is a native of Licking County, Ohio, where he grew to man’s estate. After securing the common-school education conferred upon all who attended the district schools, he entered Yale College, which gradu- ated him in 1860, and at the commencement of the war he enlisted in the Sixty-seventh Ohio Volunteer Infantry. He was mustered out at Cleve- land, Ohio, with the rank of captain in the One Hundred and Twenty-ninth Ohio Volunteers. While on a leave of absence in 1863, two very impor- tant events occurred in the life of Mr. Wheeler—his marriage with Miss A. E. Knowlton, a native of the Buckeye State, and his admittance to the bar at Newark, Ohio. When the war ended, in 1865, he came to Chattanooga, and associated himself in the practice of his professionas a member of the firm of Stanley, Henderson & Wheeler. In 1867 the firm name changed to Stanley, Wheeler & Marshall, which was dissolved in 1869, Mr. Wheeler practicing alone one year. In 1871 the present firm of Wheeler & Marshall was organized, and their long practice at the bar of Hamilton County has placed the firm among the first of the State. The parents of Mr. Wheeler, Salmon and Gillin (Chipman) Wheeler, were natives of Vermont, and their respective deaths occurred in 1874 and 1868. . George T. White, of Elder & White, attorneys, located in the White Building at the corner of Seventh and Walnut Streets, was born in North Carolina in December, 1849, and is a son of Col. J. F. White. A brief sketch of the father here would not be inappropriate: He was a native of Hawkins County, this State, but removed to Hamilton County in 1850, and a few years prior to the commencement of the war was judge of the county court. He raised a company of cavalry for the Confederate serv- ice, of which he was afterward made lieutenant-colonel; oner near Knoxville; was paroled, but before being exchanged went to Florida where he continued, after being paroled, in the employ of the Confederacy. His wife, formerly Miss Martha Faw, a native of North Carolina, died June 3, 1865. Col. White is now living at Live Oak, Fla., practicing law, and has held the position of criminal court judge. George T. White, the immediate subject of this sketch, although a native of North Carolina, was raised until fourteen years of age in this county, then went with his parents to the Peninsula State where he made his home until twenty-four years of age. In 1870 he entered Emory and was taken pris-Pt i ee HAMILTON COUNTY. 1013 Henry College, Virginia, and in 1872 graduated at the law school at Lebanon, Tenn. In 1873 he located in Chattanooga for the practice of his profession, at which he has been a decided success. May 23, 1884, the present firm of Elder & White was organized, and on the.same date he married Miss Annie Henegor, a native of Charleston, Tenn., by whom he is the father of one son. Mr, White is a member of the Masonic fra- ternity. Hon. Hugh Whiteside, ex-mayor of Chattanooga, enjoys the distinc- tion of being the first native of that city, who has held the office of mayor, and the first native of that city who has attained political prominence since the war. He was born in Chattanooga in 1854, and is a son of Hon. James A. Whiteside, one of the most distinguished men who has lived in this section since it was first settled. Our subject entered college at Sewanee in 1869, and graduated in 1878 at the age of nineteen. In 1877 he entered Washington Law University at St. Louis, graduating in the ensuing year, and began to practice in 1879. After serving as an alderman he was nominated for mayor by the Democrats by acclamation in 1883, and with a majority of 500 to 750 against him, was elected by nine votes, after one of the strongest fights ever made in the city. Mr. Whiteside’s administration of the city’s affairs has been characterized by public spirit, prudence and a fine sense of duty. In 1880 he married Miss Gertrude Staley, one of the city’s most accomplished young ladies, and they have an interesting and happy family. In August, 1886, he was elected county judge for a period of eight years, and is now filling that office. His father, Col. James A. Whiteside (deceased), was a native of Kentucky, born September 1, 1803, and the son of Jonathan and Thankful Whiteside. He came to the Sequatchie Valley in early childhood, and carried mail to Chattanooga when a young man. In 1840 he moved to Chattanooga, and practiced law until about 1850, after which he devoted his whole time, studying internal improvements of the States. He was in the State Legislature one term, and for many years was manager and vice-president of the North Carolina & St. Louis Rail- road, being instrumental in extending the St. Louis branch from Nash- ville. He was also the originator of the Atlantic Great Southern & Mis- souri Central Railroads. He was first married, February 5, 1829, to Mary J. Massengill to whom five children were born, two now living. She died in April, 1843, and February 1, 1844, he married Harriet L. Stran, a native of Virginia, who bore him nine children, one, Ann Newell, dying in infancy, the balance are still living, viz.: James Leonard, of Chatta- nooga; Florence, of Boston, Mass.; Helen, Mrs. R. Walkins, of Chatta- nooga; Vernon, of Chattanooga; Hugh, William, Charles and Glenn,REN AP, Ameen oe ening Pe SENET IE oT a eel an IRIE pi i NET sor, So ce ano . wi a ah nT ig, ' t * ; : 4 ) : { Bile ti f te | ee 1d: Sat. Fel: é : & at io ® is ee pees | es 8g ab ray a if {2a ia) | rey ial i} : tie Pee a : a7 ; Pant Fy zi! at ee ear ' BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. 1014 all of Chattanooga. The Colonel at the time of his decease, November 1, 1861, had great confidence in the future of Chattanooga, and was a very large land holder at that place. Our subject’s mother, Harriet L., resides in, Chattanooga, and is one of the wealthy and enterprising bus- iness citizens. C. 8S. Wight, M. D., isason of Seth and Barbara A. (Bean) Wight, both natives of Maine, and both of English descent. The father in early life was salesman, but has spent the greater portion of his lfe engaged in agricultural pursuits. He and wife are still living, and both are three score and ten years of age. Of their family of ten children, consisting of five sons and five daughters, three of the sons were physicians. Eli M. and Jarvis S., both served in the late war, the former as lieuten- ant and afterward as surgeon, and the latter as private and corporal-ser- geant. The elder attended both Yale and Harvard Colleges, from the latter receiving the degree of M. D. Jarvis S. prepared himself ata school of pharmacy. Both located in Chattanooga, where the former practiced medicine about eighteen years, and was twice mayor of the city. The latter engaged in the drug business. They have both been dead some years. Our subject was born November 13, 1855, in Eastern Maine, and received a good academic education. In 1876 he came to Chattanooga, and studied medicine under his brother. Having attended the medical department of the State University, from which he graduated in 1879, he returned and became a partner of Dr. Eli Wight, who died a year later. For two years our subject was city physician, and two years county physician. He is a member of the State and county medical societies, and for eight years has been in active practice. He passed through the yellow fever epidemic of 1878, and was himself prostrated by the fever. Eli M. Wight held the chair of diseases of the chest and throat, in the medical department of the University of Tennessee, was Republican candidate for governor, and was appointed a member of the State board of health. William J. Williams was born March 11, 1845, in South Wales, and came to America in 1869, settling in Pennsylvania. He was educated in the subscription schools of Wales. At the age of seventeen he left the parental roof. In 1868 he married Miss Mary Ann Davis, a native of Wales, born in 1850, and the daughter of John and Mary (Howell) Davis. To our subject and wife were born six children: Mary, John, David, Gwenie, Thomas and Griselda. In 1872 Mr. Davis left Pennsyl- vania, and came to Soddy, Tenn., where he has sinceresided. He worked in the coal mines for one year, after which he was given the position of contractor to blast the roof of the mines, which position he held forHAMILTON COUNTY. 1015 twelve years. He was then elected bank boss, which position ha now holds. He has under his supervision about 250 men. He owns his pres- ent position to his own ability as a practical miner and overseer. He has the entire confidence of his employers, and is an honest, industrious man. He and his wife and eldest two children are members of the Congrega- tional Church. In politics Mr. Williams is a Republican. William A. Willingham, of Chattanooga, was born in Beaufort County, S. C., July 6, 1837, son of Thomas and Phoebe S. (Lawton) Willingham, both natives of South Carolina. Our subject was reared and educated in his native State. In 1859 he married Miss Emilie F. Dews, of Daugherty County, Ga. She diedin 1868 leaving four chil- dren, three now living: John T., Edward G. and Maxie Belle (wife of J. K. Nuckells, wholesale shoe merchant, of Columbus, Ga). In 1862 our subject enlisted in the Third South Carolina Cavalry, and served one year as a non-commissioned officer. In 1865 he left South Carolina, and spent three years in agricultural pursuits in southwest Georgia. In 1869 he engaged in the lumber business at Forsyth, Ga., where he continued until 1876, after which he engaged in the same business at Columbus, Ga. In January, 1885, he established a sash, door, blind and general lumber business at Chattanooga. In 1869 Mr. Willingham married his present wife, Mary J. Woodruff, of Columbus, Ga., who bore him three children: Furman D., Florence and Ruby. (Mary the eldest is deceased.) Mr. Willingham is a director in the Chattanooga Savings Bank, a Democrat, an ancient Mason, a member of the A. O. U. W. and K. of P., and a deacon in the First Baptist Church of Chattanooga. Hon. H. M. Wiltse, a legal practitioner of the firm of Wiltse & McLean, is a native of Michigan, in which State he was reared and educated, graduating in law from the University of Michigan in 1874. He came to Chattanooga in 1870 and was admitted to the bar in 1873. He did not begin practicing until after his return from law school, when he practiced alone until the present firm was formed January 7, 1887. He is president and attorney for the Lookout Homestead Association, and secretary of the Iron, Coal and Manufacturers Association. He was a member of the Legislature during the years 1879-82, and was assistant postmaster of Chattanooga from July 1876 until July 1577. He was alderman three terms and city attorney four years. He was also editor of the daily and weekly Commercial about two years. In 1877 he was united in marriage to Miss Emma Fairfield, a native of Michigan, who bore him three children, only one now living. Mr. Wiltse is Chancellor Commander of Damon Lodge, No. 2, K. of P.ey neem ne en ie —— ae A a NS 1016 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX. His parents, Henry and Mary A. (Huggins) Wiltse, are natives of New York and Massachusetts, respectively. They reside in Michigan and the father is a retired farmer. David Woodworth, Jr., manager of the Fayeryweather & Ladew Tannery, Chattanooga, was born in New York in 1838, where he was reared and educated. He was brought up in the tannery from boyhood, having been connected with this company throughout. He came South in 1870 and established a tannery for the company at Paw Paw, on the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, in western Virginia. In 1876 he came to Chattanooga and established the tannery of which he has since been manager, In November, 1862, he married Mary North, of New York, who bore him one son, Clement N. Mr. Woodworth is a Republican in politics, a member of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and a director of the First National Bank. He has engaged extensively in the real estate business and has built largely in the city. He isa good citizen and a wide-awake business man. W. T. Worley, station agent at Chickamauga, also farmer and lumber dealer at the same place, was born July 14, 1847, in Cherokee County, Ga., and is the fourth of twelve children of Lodson and Evaline (Clay- ton) Worley. The father was born in North Carolina in 1812, and is now living in Cherokee County, Ga., where he has resided for the past fifty years. He is of French descent. He has been postmaster for nearly forty years. The mother was born in F orsyth County, Ga. in 1822, and is of Scotch descent. Her father, Seward ©. Clayton is still living in Cherokee County, Ga., and is elghty-eight years old. Our subject received his education in the common schools of Cherokee County, and began working for himself at the age of twenty-two. He was baggage master on the Western & Atlantic Railroad for nine years and conductor on a through run for over a year. After marriage he engaged in farming, merchandising and milling, and, although he commenced life a poor man, he now owns 326 acres on the Western & Atlantic Railroad, well improved and well cultivated. Besides this he owns a saw mill in the Fifteenth District. In 1875 he married Miss Georgia A. Kaiser, a daughter of W. J. and Nancy ( Howell) Kaiser. The father was born in North Carolina in 1815, and died in 1881. Mrs. Kaiser was born in North Carolina March 11, 1811, and died March 24, 1884. Mr. Worley is a Democrat in politics, and cast his first presidential vote for Horatio Seymour. By his mar- triage he became the father of three children: Mabel N., Clara M. and James Clark. Mrs. Worley was born October 8, 1851, and is an active worker in the Missionary Baptist Church.HAMILTON COUNTY. LOM Henry D. Wyatt, M. D. and A. M., and superintendent of the city schools of Chattanooga, is a son of Daniel and Phebe (Palmer) Wyatt, both natives of New Hampshire, where they are now living. Of their family of eight children, five are now living,—four sons and one daughter. Our subject was born in Grafton County, N. H., September 24, 1836, grew to manhood on the farm and received his rudimentary education in the common schools and in an academy. Having early imbibed a fondness for teaching he taught several terms during the winter season and worked on the farm during the summer. The war broke out about this time, and in 1862 he enlisted as a private in Company B, Fifteenth New Hampshire Infantry, United States Army, but soon arose to the rank of first lieutenant, which position he held until 1863, when he was wounded at Port Hudson, and mustered out of service in August of that year. He soon turned his attention to teaching and the study of medi- cine, attending lectures at Harvard College, and in 1865 became assistant surgeon of a regiment of heavy artillery, which position he filled until May, 1866. After cessation of hostilities he graduated from the medical department of Dartmouth College, and then, haying a desire to engage in teaching as a profession, he took the classical course at Dartmouth College, graduating in 1871. He then taught in the North until late in 1872, when he was called to take charge of the Chattanooga schools, which he organized and has brought to their present advanced condition. In 1875 he wedded Miss Alice J. Polsey, of Rhode Island. Both are church members and respected citizens. Charles C. Wynne, manager and partner of the Chattanooga Storage & Forwarding Company, was born in Gadsden, Ala., J anuary 19, 1861, son of William B. and Mary A. (Cowden) Wynne, natives respectively of South Carolina and Georgia. Our subject removed to Atlanta, Ga., in 1870, where he was reared and educated. He learned the machinist’s trade, at which he worked for some time, but afterward engaged in. the directory business in the Southern States. He-came to Chattanooga February 1, 1886, and engaged in his present business, being the cotton buyer and handler of the firm. December 10, 1882, he was united in marriage to Miss Julia E. Janes, a native of Greene County, Ga., and one son, Leroy F., was the result of this union. Mr. Wynne is a Dem- ocrat and a member of the Baptist Church. The Chattanooga Storage & Forwarding Company is individually composed of §. A. Cunning- ham and C. C. Wynne, who are lessees of M. H. Clift’s warehouse, No. 1321 Market Street. This building is 75x160 feet, with a gallery run- ning entirely around it. The firmis engaged in a general storage and brokerage business, and sells fertilizers.teres sonata pe er aetlageiene een eke Tema Ly OME ere ; ee eos - - ca « tne asada “ ee eS ~roremmemenns ati oem - - — 2 ee anaa et eee i erg ME oa = GA a mere ee ae r ane eile < sien leper i eeRPRE, ite “ Ola anes z ei - a jal adabenee egyietin tea asta aaa at lal os A omer ihln eT ABORIGINAL MAP OJ ee, wi ect a a opAdams’ St. Re = . = i pe OS ie Ge ‘ { a ( renfroe’s SL. d Se nN Ww E BA Nevill’s St: : a “a: waa St: 5 Prince’s St. fa —~) Kvilgore’s St. ‘oN O Halls St. x O : a) rockél’s St.O ( GC t. 4 f Neb yin ey | rreenfield St \ Renee Miles’ St. . White St.. 4 aorgan’s ‘St. aa Ee Caen dens) SHULL wh i) J DBledsoe’s St. aa ilar 1 8 Hendrick? Ss SED) o> 0 D Mans/rer s St. Or ae Walnut) St.0 Ay ich St. Ziegler’s St. Rock Castle § ‘sher’s Sf. IN — >) ’ 1. © O ? = — elem’ St. Gagpers Lop ne Ss So oO Sedp’ s St. Neel&s, Si.0 peaton’ S\S2. —Havy’s St Hickman. SLED > oO Cie i De ON, eh tich “Ke Donelson’s St, obertson’ SA 1A o On o0 apne y a ) Freeland's St. ~ ty Monbyeun Store 1760 and - oS Rainae. Charlevilles Sto 7 Cockil St 3 Sc ms 2 a a OR Sine 5 Si, ¢¢ San S7\0 Brown St. Buvhanaks ot. OC, ‘astleman’s~ Sf, W. LR Ip Dyer’s I Dunhams 0 lee ld’s St. NORTH CAROLINA\MIL ITARY RESERVAT Oe 1783 os \ once Fox’s Camp ee . ao | ~ v) Greene's 7 STN \ \ 28. ( ( eee |e a | CONGRESSION (Ade TA A anetent ae \ > “\) ~ Ln Ne \ > SS - NS »} A eS RESERVA TON 4 i - April 18, 1806 x Se / Sie c \ ( / ~ Rw | Ss t \ \ 1 le <= mi , \ C yeu u mae j ae Nog L \ na Sa pe Cr p Suu eo Tecullasee ( XN Muscle S/@uals - ‘old WileF OLY =\. Town Chickasaw Old na and Towns Creek ¢ TOSSING, 1791Wolf Hills Ye i 7 O Blacks St. — r~ = 2 oo os = OFt. Henry OShelby’s St. Oy Battle of Long Island Flats 1776 yong Id Se OQ Womack’s St. cy Shelbys St. aig Sevier’s Old Indian ions. 5 Ve Ryberison Stig ee St. /~ ; A Watattc a ee L OO. Carters suo, Wag = Gillespie’ s St. we » Swi = Carter's Sho {$ Robejtson’ S$ Stags Shoals ~~ a G | Fort Blackmore g / ZLisswPP ie ‘ ( Ft "mack s SIA S Grfen’s St.O Br ue me Riv&- (x So 11 mn, late (~~ ; es - Hacketl’s Sé.0/ i J rs Ne es AS SS Me AY oe xX $ War Ford \ \ IY ; pe McCo Fi a LAY A paw fy Lavel’s St. Ai A O Warm “Springs } 4 O O6 iS Rockn a 4 South west Poi NE —Cirbatts & a 6¢ elley’ i Mani Wee Me aT = AN WW 2 ~" CRAB ORCHARD MT WE QO ‘ampbell’ s SE, ie pb jee oar i Whitson’g Port g We f ; ainger Ft.g McGaughey S10 <3 Newell’ sSt. wo = TE 7 ie z A Wa} a } SDL Ss jen Me ters s St, A NS a, 7 oO ys Coyatée wee i Vy, wt NY, Wg Uel Lamotlee o Ws = e SS ‘Neoweeo 7S Ste ASS Q | x %, xy NS \ Wi, Lik ee SN s ar \ “> uy ao MWY ] of J J Se LA *\ ( f : ~ —— a \ (as ; Lae an ) U ~ f WS \ VS < 5 Old French § ” Woencee Max 5) / x ( WAY € ( { oC ae Old ¢ aoe NG AW, Ss L jG fe WS = = AIAN 17) s Us a S43 Ny (AY — | Owns = = Sys KY Wr ' \ Ze \ Hh \ L Ze j IY We xe “\\' in Zo \ fi — Ch CRGNEnG Towns- 3 aw Nee + Van’s Towns ONikkijack f ‘TslarXi Tous zs \ Tuokoue Town ning iter “VW iW s) Toni iu French \ J Store A / \ ? ) J § ( Littlef Owl Town) ( Turkey Tous 7° Bull oun Copyrighted, 1886, by THe GoopsPEED PuBLisHine Co., Nashville, Tenn.2: mere TRS PLS EE Ee een Seen arteries ye Ses mag 8 a SST ae ee ee Seat “ FETT, rete a Ee sag ee = aN pee a i maabaied DT ‘ Ae : ‘Z ote - " 3 - pen 7 el om are ~ hennawes 2 wii dst it i w= Faige = = pater e ne ——Te Sennen sorter sso semen ttieee oaea : ae - ~ ~ Ne RST — —- BEETS = r 2 wai ee é pe eT a — = — Te SSS. a IE 3 Gd chute RE a Se ies dexsacncae aces ie apelin aaa a as . = a