0 ¦J0vt theft Books '/rr\ Me,/«g^ag of a College bi^iHtrCf/ony] 10 Bought with the Income ofthe ANN S. FARNAM FUND THE SPANISH SERIES GOYA THE SPANISH SERIES EDITED BY ALBERT F. CALVERT GOYAToledo Madrid SevilleMurillo Cordova El Greco VelazquezThe Prado The Escorial Royal Palaces of Spain Spanish Arms and Armour Granada and the Alhambra Leon, Burgos, and Salamanca Catalonia, Valencia and Murcia Valladolid, Oviedo, Segovia, Zamora, Avila, and Zaragoza GOYA AN ACCOUNT OF HIS LIFE AND WORKS BY ALBERT F. CALVERT, WITH 612 RE PRODUCTIONS FROM HIS PICTURES, ETCHINGS, AND LITHOGRAPHS LONDON: JOHN LANE, THE BODLEY HEAD NEW YORK: JOHN LANE COMPANY MCMVIII To THE MARQUIS OF CO MILL AS My dear Marquis, I beg you to accept the dedication of this volume as a mark of the high value I place upon your friendship, and as a sincere expression of my esteem for yourself as a patron of the arts, a true philanthropist, and a lifelong worker in the interests of Spanish greatness. I am, my dear Marquis, Your sincere and obliged, ALBERT F. CALVERT. Edinburgh : T. and A. Constable, Printers to His Majesty PREFACE It has been said that in England everybody knows of Cervantes, but very few persons have more than a nodding acquaintance with Don Quixote, and Goya's reputation in this country is even less securely founded. The great Ara- gonese is indeed little more than a name to the general public, and his work is literally unknown. Two little books — Mr. W. Rothenstein's Goya, now out of print, and a monograph by Mr. Richard Muther in the Langham Series — are the only volumes in English dealing exclusively with a painter who for more than half a century might have been described, with more aptness than that with which the words were applied to Zurbaran, as ' All Spain.' As sincere a lover and as brilliant a transcriber of the beautiful as Watteau and Van Loo, a greater realist than Hogarth, and in portraiture second only to Velazquez, Goya stands out as the greatest artist Spain has pro duced since the death of the great Court painter of Philip IV. The fact that Spanish art reflects the aspira tions and is largely concerned with the repre- viii GOYA sentation of scenes selected by its chief patron, the Spanish Catholic Church, accounts, in some measure, for the lack of sympathy and apprecia tion with which it is regarded in this country, but this prejudice does not explain the neglect from which Goya has suffered. Goya, it is true, accepted commissions from the Church, but his religious subjects do not comprise a tenth of his canvases, and in his etchings and engravings he is seen only as a secular moralist. As the painter of the Spanish Rococo period, he dipped his brush in beauty, gaiety, and humour ; as a portraitist he was vivid, surprising, audacious, a maker of masterpieces ; while his etchings constitute an unrivalled commentary upon the spirit of the age, recorded by its ' most fearless and advanced thinker.' Goya's art would appear to be the reflection of his life. His youth was disordered and tempest uous ; in the height of his success he accepted favours, but he was too conscientious an artist to repay the adulation of the world by flattering it in his canvases ; and he published his disillusions in the biting satire of his Caprices and Proverbs. The authorities I have consulted would make a formidable list, but among those to whom PREFACE ix I am under special obligation I must mention the ' Lives ' of Goya by the Conde de la Viflaza, Paul Lefort, Paul Lafond, W. Rothenstein, Richard Muther and Julius Hofmann ; Vale rian von Loga's works on Goya's etchings and engravings ; Don Juan de la Rada's chapter on ' Goya's Frescoes in the Church of San Antonio de la Florida;' Muther's appreciation of Goya in his History of Modern Painting; Stirling-Max well's Annals of the Artists of Spain ; Carl Justi's ' Sketch of Spanish Art ' in Baedeker's Spain and Portugal; C. Gasquoine Hartley's Spanish Painting; the Boletin de la Sociedad Espanola de Excursiones ; and Th£ophile Gautier's brilliant study of Goya in his Travels in Spain. In making the collection of Goya's works that is presented at the end of this volume, I have taken the line of least resistance and included reproductions of every picture, etching, or litho graph that I could acquire. However inadequate photography and 'process' may be to convey an impression of the original works, I have endeavoured to give English students an oppor tunity of becoming acquainted with the subjects and general nature of much of the output of Goya's sixty years of artistic effort. x GOYA In the compilation of the appended exhaustive catalogue of Goya's works, which I am not without hope may be found of practical value, I have derived no little assistance from Spanish and German publications and from the list prepared by M. Paul Lafond. To Senor Don Mariano Moreno, who has made a special study of Goya and his work, I am indebted for de scriptions of many pictures which are published here for the first time, and my thanks are also due to him for permission to reproduce from his collection a number of photographs which were new to me. I have also to acknowledge the kindness of the authorities of the Academy of San Fernando in allowing me to publish copies of the different prints of Goya's works issued by the Academy ; and to express my thanks to Sefior Don J. Lacoste, Messrs. Braun, Clement and Co., Messrs. Mansell and Co., and Herr Franz Hahfstaengl, for their courtesy in sup plying me with various pictures included in this collection and permitting me to reproduce them. A. F. C. ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE SUBJECT i. The Family of Charles iv., 2. The Infante Don Carlos, 3. The Infante Francisco de Antonio, 4. The Infanta Maria Josefa, 5. The Infante Don Antonio, 6. The Infante Don Carlos Isidro, . 7. King Charles iv. , . > 8. King Charles IV. , 9. King Charles iv. , 10. King Charles iv., n. King Charles iv. , 12. King Charles IV. , 13. Queen Maria Luisa, 14. Queen Maria Luisa, 15. Queen Maria Luisa, 16. Queen Maria Luisa, 17. Queen Maria Luisa, 18. Queen Maria Luisa, 19. Ferdinand vu. , 20. Ferdinand vii. , GALLERY . Prado, Madrid. . Prado, Madrid. Paula . Prado, Madrid. . Prado, Madrid. . Prado, Madrid. Maria . Prado, Madrid. . Ministerio de Hacienda, Madrid. . Ministerio de Hacienda, Madrid. Royal Palace, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid. Don A. de Beruete, Madrid. Don Jos6 L:_ zan. , Ministerio de Hacienda, Madrid. Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Academy of St. Ferdinand, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Xll GOYA TLATE SUBJECT 21. Ferdinand VII. , 22. Ferdinand VII., 23. Don Luis, Prince of Parma, 24. Duchess of Abrantes, 25. Duchess of Alba, 26. Duchess of Alba, 27. Duchess of Alba, 28. Duchess of Alba, 29. Condesa de Altamira and Daughter, 30. Count of Altamira, .... 31. The Infante Don Luis de Borbon, . 32. Altamirano, Auditor of Seville, 33. Don Manuel Lapefia, Marques de Bondad Real, .... 34. Marquesa de Caballero, . 35. Conde de Cabarrus, 36. The Wife of Cean Bermudez, . 37. J. Cean Bermudez, . 38. Dona Lorenzo Correa, . 39. The Toreador Costillares, 40. Don Joaquin Maria Ferrer, 41. Condesa-Duquesa de Benavente y Osuna 42. Dona Manuela de Alvarez Comas, . 43. Florida Blanca, 44. Don Antonio Foraster, . 45. The Engineer Ignacio Garcini, 46. Dona Josefa Castilla- Portugal, 47. Don Juan Antonio Cuervo, 48. Dona. Maria Ildefonso Dabalos, 49. General Don Juan Martin, GALLERY Prado, Madrid. Ancient Collection of Eus- taquio Veate. Prado, Madrid. Duquesa de Abrantes, Madrid. Don Rafael Barrio. Palacio de Liria, Madrid. Duque de Alba, Madrid. Marques de Cervera. Bank of Spain, Madrid. Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid. Marques de la Vega Inclan. Don Joaquin Argamanilla. Marques de Cervera. Bank of Spain, Madrid. Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid. Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid. M. Bischoffsheim, Paris. Don Jose' Lazaro. Count of Candilla. Madrid. Marquis of Baroja. Marquesa de Martorell. Don J. Millan. The Garcini Family, Madrid. Don Vicente Garcini. Don F. Duran. Count of Villagonzalo. Don Luis Navas. ILLUSTRATIONS xm PLATE SUBJECT 50. Godoy, Prince of the Peace, . Si. F. Guillemardet 52. Jaspar Melchor de Jovellanos, 53. Asensio Julia 54. The Milkmaid of Bordeaux, . 55. Asensio Julia, 56. Marquesa de Lazan, 57. Don Francisco Larrumbe, 58. The Bookseller of the Calle de Carretas, Sg. Don J. Antonio Llorente, 60. Duke of San Carlos, 61. Duke of San Carlos, 62. The Actor Isidoro Maiquez, . 63. The Actor Isidoro Maiquez, . 64. Countess of Miranda del Castaiiar, 65. Conde de Miranda, 66. Leandro Fernandez de Moratin, 67. The Family of the Countess of Montijo, .... 68. Senor J. B. de Muguiro, . 69. Marques de Castro Terreflo, . 70. Marquesa de Castro Terrefio, . 71. Camar6n, 72. Muiiarriz, 73. Duke of Osuna and Family, . 74. Admiral Mazaredo, 75. Melendez Valdfe, . 76. Duke of Osuna, GALLERY Academy of St. Ferdinand, Madrid. Louvre, Paris. Marquesa de Villamajor, Madrid. Comtesse de Paris. Condesa Vinda de Muguiro. Louvre, Paris. Comtesse de Montijo. Bank of Spain, Madrid. Don Benito Garriga. Don Francisco Llorente y Garcia de Vinuesa. Marques de la Torrecilla. Conde de Villagonzalo. Prado, Madrid. Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid. Formerly in the Montijo Collection. Academy of St. Ferdinand, Madrid. Palacio de Liria, Madrid. Condesa Vinda de Muguiro. Dona E. Camaron. Academy of St. Ferdinand. Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Don M. Hernando. Senor Suarez Incl&n. Formerly in the Collection of the Duke of Osuna. xiv GOYA PLATE SUBJECT 77. Duke of Osuna, 78. Duke of Osuna, 79. Duke of Osuna, 80. Duquesa del Parque, 81. Doctor Peral 82. General Palafox, 83. Dona Isabel Corbo de Porcel, 84, Don Tiburcio Perez, 85. Don Mariano Luis de Urquijo, 86. Don Tomas Perez Estala, 87. Don Pantaledn Perez de Nenin, 88. Marquesa de Pontejos, . 89. Don Ramon Pignatelli, 90. General Ricardos, 91. The Toreador Jos6 Romero, . 92. Marques de San Adrian, 93. The Espada Pedro Romero, . 94. Ramon Satue 95. Don Manuel Silvela, 96. Doiia Maria Teresa Apodaca Sesma, 97. Marquesa de la Solana, . 98. General Urrutia, 99. Maria del Rosario Fernandez, 100. Maria del Rosario Fernandez, 101. Marques de Tolosa, 102. Conde de Teba, 103. Jos6 de Vargas Ponce, . 104. Don Jose" de Toro Zambrano, 105. Dona Antonia Zarate, . . Marquesa de Villamajor, Madrid. . M. Duniat, Paris. . Formerly in the Palace of the Duque de Osuna, Madrid. . Marques de la Vega, Madrid. . National Gallery, London. Prado, Madrid. . National Gallery, London. . D. F. Duran and Cuervo. . Academy of History, Madrid. . Countess of Cedillo. . Don P. Labat. . Marquesa de Martorell. . Duquesa de Villahermosa. . Madrid. . Madrid. . Collection of the Family. . Duque de Veragua. . Dr. Benito Garriga. . Don F. Silvela. de . Don Andres Arteta. . Marques del Socorro. . Prado, Madrid. . Academy of St. Ferdinand Madrid. . Conde de Villagonzalo. . Bank of Spain, Madrid . Don J. Lazarp. . Academy of History Madrid. . Bank of Spain, Madrid. . Senora Vinda de Albacete. ILLUSTRATIONS xv PLATE SUBJECT 106. Dona Antonia Zarate, 107. Dona Lola Zimenez, 108. Don Evaristo Perez de Castro, 109. Don Juan Jos6 Mateo Arias Dairla, no. Father Lascanal in. Don Ramon de Posada y Soto, 112. Marques de Caballero, . 113. Conde de Gazinza, . 114. Moratin, .... 115. The Artist 116. The Artist, 117. The Artist, 118. The Artist 119. The Artist, by Vicente Lopez, 120. Don J. B. de Goicoechea, 121. Goya's Grandson, . 122. Doiia Feliciana Bayeu, . 123. Don Juan Martin de Goicoechea, 124. Dona Narcisa Baranona de Goicoechea, .... 125. Doha Juana Galarza de Goicoechea, 126. Francisco Bayeu, . 127. Josefa Bayeu, . 128. Group of Heads, 129. Portrait Study of a Woman, 130. Portrait of a Young Girl, 131. Portrait of a Lady, . 132. Portrait of a Lady, . 133. Portrait of a Lady, . 134. Portrait of a Lady, . 135. Portrait of a Lady, . GALLERY Seiiora Vinda de Albacete. M. Chiramy, Paris. Louvre, Paris. Marquesa de Almaguer. Don J. Lazaro. Don Jos6 Maria Perez Caballero. Marques de Cervera, Madrid. Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid. Don F. Silvela. Academy of St. Ferdinand, Madrid. Don A. Pidal. M. Leon Bonnet. Prado, Madrid. Don Felipe Modet. Marques de Alcafiices. Don C. Ferriz. Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid. Don Felipe Modet. Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Comtesse de Paris. Private Property. Conde de Pefialvez. Don Jos6 L-Lzaro. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. XVI GOYA PLATE SUBJECT 136. Portrait of a Lady, . 137. Portrait of a Lady, . 138. Portrait of a Woman, 139. A Little Girl, . 140. Portrait of a Lady, . 141. Young Spanish Woman, 142. Portrait of a Man, . 143. The Old Man, 144. Portrait of an Architect, 145. Portrait of a Doctor, 146. Portrait of a Lady, . 147. Portrait of a Lady, . 148. Portrait of a Lady, . 149. Portrait of a Lady, . 150. Portrait of a Man, . 151. Portrait of a Lady, . 152. Portrait of a Lady, . 153. Portrait of a Gentleman, 154. Charles IV., . 155. Queen Maria Luisa, 156. The Infanta Isabel, 157. Portrait of a Man, . 158. Don Felix Colon, . 159. Don Felix Colon, 160. Portrait of a Man, . 161. Portrait of a Boy, . 162. Portrait of a Boy, . 163, Portrait of a Boy, . 164. Portrait of a Lady, . 165. Portrait of a Lady, . 166. Portrait of a Lady, . 167. Portrait of a Young Lady, 168. Episode of the French Invasion 1808 GALLERY Don A. de Beruete. Don R. Garcia. Louvre, Paris. Marques de Casa Torres Madrid. Don J. Gutierrez Martin. Louvre, Paris. Private Collection. Conde de Da. Marina. Senor Orossen. Comtesse de Paris. Comtesse de Paris. Comtesse de Paris. Don Ricardo Traumann, Madrid. Don Ricardo Traumann, Madrid. Mons. C. G., Paris. of Prado, Madrid. ILLUSTRATIONS xv PLATE SUBJECT 169. Episode of the French Invasion of 1808 170. Casting Bullets by Moonlight in the Hills of Tardienta, 171. Scenes of the 2nd May 1808, . 172. Battle-Scene, 173. Manufacturing Powder in the Sierra de Tardienta, .... 174. The Tribunal of the Inquisition, 175. The Procession of Flagellants, 176. A Meeting of the Company of the Philippines, ..... 177. The City of Madrid : an Allegory, , 178. Music : an Allegory, 179. Spain making History, . 180. The Madhouse, 181. The Majas of the Balcony, 182. The Majas of the Balcony, 183. The Majas of the Balcony, 184. La Maja (Nude), . 185. La Maja (Clothed), 186. The Knife-Grinder, 187. The Water-Carrier, 188. Old Age, . . 189. Robbery of a Coach, 190. Brigands, 191. Brigand murdering a Woman, 192. Brigands stripping their Captives, 193. Murder by Brigands, 194. Brigands' Care, 195. Goya and the Duchess of Alba. 196. The Plague Terror, 197. The Monk's Visit, . 198. A Masquerade, 199. The Dance, ' . Duquesa de Villahermosa. Royal Palace, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid. Royal Palace, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Academy of St. Ferdinand, Madrid. Corporation of Madrid. Don Luis Navas. Don Luis Navas. Prado, Madrid. Duque de Marchesa. Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Budapest. Budapest. Lille Museum. Marques de Castro Serna. Marques de la Romana. Marques de la -Romana. Marques de la Romana. Marques de la Romana. Marques de la Romana. Marques de la Romana. Marques de la Romana. Marques de la Romana. Duquesa de Villahermosa. Marques de la Torrecilla. Vlll GOYA LATE SUBJECT 200. The Funeral of the Sardine, 201. The Booth at the Fair, . 202. The Greasy Pole, . 203. The Bonfire, . 204. Nocturnal Scene, 205. The Picnic, 206. The Inundation, 207. The Village on Fire, 208. Caprice, .... 209. Caprice, 210. Caprice, .... 211. Dogs and Guns: Design Tapestry, 212. A Dead Bird, . 213. Dead Birds, 214. A Picador on Horseback, 215. Picador and Bull, . 216. Death of the Picador, 217. A Bull-Fight, . 218. A Bull escaped from the Arena, 219. Meeting of Witches, 220. Galician Shepherds fighting, . 221. The Procession, 222. Caprice, ..... 223. The Fates, 224. Saturn devouring one of Children, .... 225. Judith and Holofernes, . 226. Two Monks, . 227. The Maja, .... GALLERY . Academy of St. Ferdinand, Madrid. . Marques de Castro Serna. . Marques de Castro Torres. . Conde de Villagonzalo. . Marques de la Romana. . Marques de la Torrecilla. . Marques de Castro Serna. . Marques de Castro Serna. . Doiia C. Berganza de Martin. . Dona C. Berganza de Martin. . Don A. Pidal. for . Prado, Madr d. . Prado, Madrid. . Prado, Madrid. . Prado, Madrid. . Marques de Baroja. . Paris. . Bequeathed to the Royal Academy, Madrid. . Duque de Veragua. . Prado, Madrid. . Prado, Madrid. . Conde de Candilla. . Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. his . Prado, Madrid. . Prado, Madrid. 228. A Caprice, 229. Listening to the News, From Goya's Country House near Madrid. Prado, Madrid. ILLUSTRATIONS xix PLATE SUBJECT 230. A Group of Witches, A Group of Witches, The Bull-Fight Pilgrimage to the Fountain of San Isidro Meeting of Witches, Two Old People eating Porridge, . The Mass of Parida, 237. The Topers, 238. Women of Madrid, and Friars, 239. The Majas and the Majo, The Witch, . Laughing Women, The Swing, . The Greasy Pole, The Accident, Coach attacked by Bandits, Building the Church, 231. 232 233. 234-23S- 236. 240. 241. 242. 243- 244.245-246. 247. The Village Procession, . 248. Summer : Threshers of Wheat, 249. The Hermitage of San Isidro, 250. The Wounded Mason, . 251. The Hermitage of San Isidro, 252. Scene from the Play ' El hechizado por fuerza' — The Bewitched, 253. The Picnic 254. Herd of Bulls coming from the"> Munoza J 255. A Caprice 256. A Witches' Conventicle, 257. Sorcery Scene, .... 258. Don Juan and the Comendador, GALLERY Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Marques de la Torrecilla. Marques de Casa Torres. Prado, Madrid. Duke de Montellano. Duke de Montellano. Duke de Montellano. Duke de Montellano. From the Collection of the Duque de Osuna. From the Collection of the Duque de Osuna. Don Ricardo Traumann. Don P. F. Durdn. Don P. F. Durdn. Prado, Madrid. National Gallery, London. National Gallery, London From the Collection of the Duque de Osuna. From the Collection of the Duque de Osuna. From the Collection of the Duque de Osuna. From the Collection Duque de Osuna. From the Collection Duque de Osuna. XX GOYA PLATE SUBJECT 259. Don Quixote, . 260. St. Bernard of Siena, Church of San Francisco el Grande. Marques de Torrecilla. Toledo Cathedral. Prado, Madrid. Don A. Beruete, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Seville Cathedral. Don A. Canovas, Madrid. Don A. Pidal, Madrid. 261. St. Bernard of Siena, 262. Christ taken by the Soldiers, . 263. Christ on the Cross, 264. The Death of St. Joseph, 265. The Holy Family, .... 266. St. Justa and St. Rufina, 267. Apparition of St. Isidore to King Ferdinand ill., 268. St. Peter, .... 269. The Prayer in the Garden of Geth semane, The Rector of San Antonio, 270. St. Elizabeth of Hungary healing Lepers, .... Don Clemente Velasco. 271. St. Hermenegild in Prison, . . Don Clemente Velasco. 272. Angels and Cherubim, . . . Conde de Villagonzalo. 273. Fresco of the Cupola of San Antonio'' de la Florida, 1st Section, 274. Fresco ofthe Cupola of San Antonio de la Florida, 2nd Section, . 275. Fresco of the Cupola of San Antonio de la Florida, 3rd Section, . 276. Fresco of the Cupola of San Antonio de la Florida, 4th Section, ' . 277. Group of Angels from San Antonio de la Florida 278. Fresco of San Antonio de la Florida, 279. Lunch on the Banks of the Manza- nares : Tapestry Cartoon, . 280. Dance at San Antonio de la Florida : Tapestry Cartoon, 281. The Scuffle at the New Inn : Tapestry Cartoon, 282. Al Fresco Scene : Tapestry Cartoon The Church of San Antonio de la Florida. Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. Prado, Madrid. ILLUSTRATIONS xxi •¦LATE SUBJECT GALLERY 283. The Drinker : Tapestry Cartoon, . Prado, Madrid. 284. The Parasol : Tapestry Cartoon, . Prado, Madrid. 285. The Kite : Tapestry Cartoon, . Prado, Madrid. 286. The Card-Players : Tapestry Car toon, Prado, Madrid. 287. Children with a Bladder : Tapestry Cartoon, Prado, Madrid. 288. Boys picking Fruit : Tapestry Car toon Prado, Madrid. 28g. Blind Man playing the Guitar : Tapestry Cartoon, . . . Prado, Madrid. 290. The Fair of Madrid : Tapestry Car- toon, Prado, Madrid, 291. The Crockery Seller : Tapestry Cartoon, Prado, Madrid. 292. The Soldier and"j the Girl: l-Tapestry Cartoons, Prado, Madrid. La Acerolera : J 293. Playing at Soldiers : Tapestry Car toon, Prado, Madrid. 294. The Game of Pelota : Tapestry Cartoon Prado, Madrid. 295. The Washerwomen : Tapestry Car toon, ... . . Prado, Madrid. 296. La NoviUada : Tapestry Cartoon, . Prado, Madrid. 297. The Tobacco Guard : Tapestry Cartoon, . ... Prado, Madrid. 298. Children climb-'' ing a Tree : The Hunter and his Dogs : The Child and the Bird : 299. The Woodcutters: Tapestry Car toon, Prado, Madrid. 300. The Rendezvous : Tapestry Car toon,- Prado, Madrid •Tapestry Cartoons, Prado, Madrid. xxii GOYA PLATE SUBJECT GALLERY 301. The Gardener : Tapestry Cartoon, Prado, Madrid. 302. The Vintagers : Tapestry Cartoon, Prado, Madrid. 303. Poor , Woman at the Fountain : Tapestry Cartoon, . . . Prado, Madrid. 304. Winter : Tapestry Cartoon, . . Prado, Madrid. 305. The Wedding : Tapestry Cartoon, Prado, Madrid. 306. Women at the Fountain : Tapestry Cartoon Prado, Madrid. 307. The Swing : Tapestry Cartoon, . Prado, Madrid. 308. The Stilt-Walkers : Tapestry Car toon Prado, Madrid. 309. Boys climbing a Tree : Tapestry Cartoon Prado, Madrid. 310. Boy on a Sheep : Tapestry Cartoon, Prado, Madrid. CAPRICES. PLATE SUBJECT 3"- 1. Francisco Goya y Lucientes, Painter. 312. 2. So it is settled. 3*3- 3- Here comes the Bogey ! 314- 4- The Old Spoilt Child. 315- S- Birds of a Feather. 316. 6. Appearances are Deceptive. 317- 7- Not thus can he distinguish her. 318. 8. Kidnapped. 319- 9- Tantalus. 320. 10. Love and Death. 321. n. Andalusian Brigands. Boys, to Work ! 322. 12. Tooth-hunting. 323- 13- Scalding Hot ! 324- 14- What a Sacrifice ! 325- IS- Good Counsel. 326. 16. ' May God pardon her ! ' 327- 17- Bien tirada esta. 328. 18. ' And his House is burning ! ' ILLUSTRATIONS xxiii PLATE SUBJECT 329- 19. 'All will fall.' 33°- 20. They are already plucked. 331- 21. How they pluck her. 332- 22. Poor Little Things ! 333- 23. Carry this Dust away. 334- 24. No Remedy. 33S- 25. Because he broke the Pitcher. 336. 26. Now they have a Seat. 337- 27. Which is the more bored ? 338. 28. Hush! 339- 29. This is what he calls Reading. 34°- 30. Why hide them ? 341- 31. She prays for her. 342- 32. For Over-sensibility. 343- 33. ' To the Count Palatine.' 344- 34. Sleep conquers them. 345- 35. They shave him. 346. 36. A Bad Night. 347- 37. Will the Pupil know more than the Master ? 348. 38. Bravissimo ! 349- 39. As far as his Grandfather. 35°- 40. Of what 111 will ne die? 35i- 41. Neither more nor less. 352. 42. Thou who canst not. 353- 43. The Sleep of Reason produces Monsters. 3S4- 44. They spin Linen. 355- 45. There is a lot to do. 356- 46. Doing Penance. 357- 47. Homage to the Master. 358. 48. The Blowers. 359- 49. Little Ghosts. 360. 50. The Chinchillas. 361. 51. They cut each others' Nails. 362. 52. What a Tailor can do. 3^3- 53. ' What an Orator ! ' 364- 54. The Shameful One. 36S- 55. Till Death. XXIV GOYA 366. 56- 367. 57- 368. S3- 369- 59- 370. 60. 37i- 61. 372. 62. 373- 63- 374- 64. 37S- 65- 376- 66. 377- 67. 378. 68. 379- 69. 380. 70. 381. 71- 382. 72. 383- 73- 384- 74- 38S- 75- 386. 76. 387- 77- 388. 78. 389- 79- 39°- 80. SUBJECT Ascending and Descending. The Pedigree. Swallow that, you Dog ! And yet they do not go. Trials. Up above the World so high ! Who would believe it ? How grave they are ! Bon Voyage. Where is Mamma going? Changing Lodgings. Wait till you have been anointed. Pretty Mistress. Fanning the Brazier. - Devout Professions. The Day breaks, let us go. You will not escape. It is better to do nothing. Don't shout, Idiot. Will no one set us free ? The Habit of Command. A Mimic Bull-Fight. Be quick, they waken. No one has seen us. Time 's Up ! DISASTERS OF WAR. 391. ±. Sad Presentiments. 392. 2. With or without Reason. 393. 3. All the Same. 394. 4. Women inspire Courage. 395. s- And are like Wild Beasts. 396. 6. Well deserved ! 397. 7. Courage) ILLUSTRATIONS xxv PLATE SUBJECT 398. 8. What always happens. 399. 9. They will not ! 400. 10. Nor they. 401. n. Nor for these! 402. 12. Were you born for this? 403. 13. A Bitter Sight. 404. 14. Hard is the Way. 405. 15. And there was no Remedy. 406. 16. They avail themselves. 407. 17. An argument. 408. 18. To bury and to be silent. 409. 19. There is not Time. f 410. 20. To heal each other. 411. 21. It will be the Same. 412. 22. As much and more. 413. 23. The same elsewhere. 414. 24. They are still of use. 415. 25. And these also. 416. 26. That cannot be seen 417. 27. Charity. 418. 28. The Populace. 419. 29. He deserved it. 420. 30. The Tragedy of War. 421. 31. Strong Measures. 422. 32. Why? 423. 33- What more is there to do ? 424. 34. For a Knife. 425- 35- No one knows why. 426. 36. Nor wherefore. 427. 37. This is worse. 428. 38. Barbarians. 429. 39. A Great Feat with the Dead. 430. 40. He turns it to Account. 431. 41. They escape through the Flames. 432. 42. All is in Confusion. 433. 43. Here also, 434. 44. ' I saw it.' XXVI GOYA 435 45- 436 46. 437 47- 438 48. 439 49. 440 5°- 441 5i- 442 52. 443 53- 444 54- 44S SS- 446 56- 447 57- 448 58. 449 59- 4S° 60. 451 61. 452 62. 453 63- 454 64. 465 65- 456 66. 457 67. 458 68. 459 69. 460 70. 461 71- 462 72. 463 73- 464 74- 465 75- 466 76. 467 77- 468 78. 469 79- 470 80. SUBJECT And this, likewise. This is bad. Thus it happened. Cruel Misfortune ! A Woman's Charity. Unhappy Mother. Thanks to the Blue Millet. They arrive too late. He died without Help. Vain Clamours. To beg is worst of all. To the Cemetery. The Healthy and the Sick. Of no Use to cry. Of what Use is a Cup ? No one to help. Are they of another Race ? Death-beds. Collected Dead. Cartloads for the Cemetery. ' What means this Tumult?' Strange Devotion. This is not less so. What Folly ! Nothing ; he says it himself. They do not know the Way. Against the General Good. The Consequences. The Cat's Pantomime. This is worse. A Meeting of Quacks. The Carnivorous Vulture. May the Rope break. He defends himself well. Truly she died. Should she revive ! ILLUSTRATIONS xxvii TAUROMACHIA PLATE SUBJECT 471. x. Hunting Bulls across Country in the Olden Time. 472. 2. Hunting the Bull on Foot. 473. 3. Moors hunting the Bull across Country. 474. 4. Moors fighting the Bull in an Enclosure. 47S- 5- The Moor Gazul fighting the Bull. 476. 6. Moors irritating the Bull. 477. 7. Origin of the Banderilla. 478. 8. Moor attacked by a Bull. 479. 9. Spaniard, wearing a Turban, slaying a Bull. 480. 10. Charles v. spearing a Bull in the Arena of Valladolid. 481. 11. The Cid spearing a Bull. 482. 12. Mob attacking a Bull. 483. 13. Horsemen planting Banderillas in the Bull. 484. 14. The Student of Falces and the Bull. 485. 15. The famous Martincho planting Banderillas. 486. 16. Martincho's Feat. 487. 17. Moors using Donkeys as a rampart against Bulls. 488. 18. Martincho in the Arena at Zaragoza. 489. 19. Martincho's Feat at Zaragoza. 490. 20. Juanito Apinani in the Arena at Madrid. 491. 21. Spectators slain by the Bull at Madrid. 492. 22. The Female Picador, Pajuelera, at Zaragoza. 493. 23. Mariano Ceballos, alias el Indio, in the Arena. 494. 24. Ceballos mounted on a Bull in the Arena at Madrid . 495. 25. Bull-Baiting by Dogs. 496. 26. Picador overthrown by the Bull. 497. 27. Fernando del Toro in the Arena. 498. 28. Rendon in the Arena at Madrid. 499. 29. Pepe-Illo faces the Bull. 500. 30. Pedro Romero in the Arena. 501. 31. Flaming Banderillas. 502. 32. Bull overthrowing Picador. S°3- 33- Death of Pepe-Illo in the Arena at Madrid. XXVIII GOYA PLATE 5°4- 505S06. 5°7508, S09 5i°. SUBJECT 34. Picadors mounted on Mules harnessed to a Carriage. 35. Bull carrying a Wounded Toreador on his Horns. 36. Bull carrying a Dead Toreador on his Horns. 37. Variation of No. 25. Bull-baiting. 38. A Spanish Gentleman in the Ring. 39. Bravo Toro ! 40. Nearing the End. PROVERBS 5"- 1. 512. 2. 5*3- 3- 514- 4- 5iS- S- Si6. 6. 517. 7- 518. 8. 519- 9- 520. IO. 521. 11. 522. 12. 523- 13- 524- 14. 525- 15- 526. 16. 527- 17- S28. 18. Women tossing a Dead Donkey and Mannikins in a Blanket. Soldiers flying from a Tree draped to represent a Ghost. Persons listening to an Orator. Peasant dancing before a Man and Woman. Man carrying off a Woman on a Winged Monster. The Infuriated Man. Man and Woman joined together at the Shoulders. Persons dressed in Sacks. Fantastic Personage offering Kittens to two Women. Human Beings maltreated by a wild Horse. A Two-headed Woman pursued by two Men. Majos and Majas dancing. Men attempting to fly. Fantastic Salutations. A Monk preaches ; Soldier throws himself down an Abyss. Man and Woman quarrelling. Persons deriding a Blind Man. The Old Man and the Corpse. ILLUSTRATIONS XXIX EXAMPLES IN THE COLLECTION OF SENOR A. DE BERUETE PLATE SUBJECT 529. The Promenade, 530. A Pauper, 531. The Madman, 532. The Miser, 533. A Woman flying, 534. Madmen, 535. The Maja and the Cloaked Man 536. A Monk suspended in the Air, 537. The Living Skeleton, 538. French Chastisement, 539. To have and to hold, 540. The Snake-Charmer, 541. Charity, .... 542. Who will win ? 543. The Madman, 544. The Lady with the Puppies 545. Paupers 546. Procession entering the Temple, 547. Women praying, . 548. Mid-Lent, 549. Brides of the Church, 550. Melodious Mediators, 551. A Sleeping Maja, . 552. The Skaters, . 553. Study for the Young Infante in ' The Family of King Charles iv.,' SS4. Study for the Portrait of the Queen in ' The Family of King Charles IV.,' . 555. Sleeping Giant, 556. A Gentle Episode, 557. A Prisoner, 358. The Happy Man, GALLERY Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete, Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A.'de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. XXX GOYA PLATE SUBJECT 559. Under a Hood, 560. Fairy Tales, . 561. Spanish Beauty, 562. Haut-ton, 563. The Man with the Crocodile, 564. At last it breaks, 565. The Broken Pitcher, 566. Woman with a Child in Arms 567. Rural Events, . 568. Chastisement, . 569. A Monk doing Penance, 570. The Invalid, . 571. Mirar lo que no ven, 572. An Idiot, 573. Invocation, S74- Prayer, . 575. A Mad Newswoman, 576. A Monk 577. The Bride, 578. The Belle ofthe Assembly, 579. One more Unfortunate, . 580. A Portrait, GALLERY . Don A . de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. . Don A. de Beruete. FRESCOES IN THE CHURCH OF SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA 581. Interior of the Church of San An tonio de la Florida, 582. San Antonio de la Florida, 583. San Antonio de la Florida, 584, 585. San Antonio de la Florida, Painting in the Principal Chapel. Paintings on the Centres of the Intrados of the Choir and Principal Chapel Arches. Paintings on the Springings of the Intrados of the Principal Chapel Arches. ILLUSTRATIONS XXXI PLATE 586, 587. San Antonio de la Florida, 588. San Antonio de la Florida, 589. San Antonio de la Florida, 590. San Antonio de la Florida, 591. San Antonio de la Florida, 592, 593- San Antonio de la Florida, S94, 595. San Antonio de la Florida, 596. San Antonio de la Florida, 597. San Antonio de la Florida, 598. San Antonio de la Florida, 599. San Antonio de la Florida, 600. San Antonio de la Florida, . Paintings on the Springings of the Intrados of the Choir Arches. . Paintings on the Intrados of the left Side Chapel Arch. . Paintings on the Intrados of the right Side Chapel Arch. . Triangles formed by the Dome adjoining the Prin cipal Chapel. . Triangles formed by the Domeadjoining the Choir. . Paintings at the Sides of the Window on the left. . Paintings at the Sides of the Window on the right. . First Group on the Cupola to the left of the Centre. . Second Group on the Cupola to the left of the Centre. . Centre of the Composition on the Cupola facing the Entrance. . First Group on the Cupola to the right of the Centre. . Second GroupontheCupola to the right of the Centre. DRAWINGS, ETC. 601. The Duke of Wellington, 1812, 602. Lady and Gentleman on back. Horse- From the Original Drawing in the Print Room of the British Museum. From the Original Drawing in the Print Room of the British Museum. xxxii GOYA PLATE 603. Head of the Dying Fray Juan From the Original Drawing Fernanez. in the Print Room of the British Museum. 604. A Criminal undergoing the infliction From the Original Drawing of the Garotte. in the Print Room of the British Museum. 605. A Lost Soul From the Original Drawing in the Print Room of the British Museum. 606. Condemned Criminals conducted to From the Original Drawing Execution. in the Print Room of the British Museum. 07. Spanish Proverb Illustrated, . . From an Etching, hitherto unpublished, in the Print Room of the British Museum. 608. Spanish Proverb Illustrated, . . From an Etching; hitherto unpublished, in the Print Room of the British Museum. 609. Spanish Proverb Illustrated, . . From an Etching, hither to unpublished, in the British Museum. 610. The Bulls : A Study of the Animals From an Etching, hither- in various positions. to unpublished, in the British Museum. 611. Bull-fighter fettered in the Arena, . From an Etching, hither to unpublished, in the British Museum. 612. A Blind Guitar-Player tossed by a From an Etching in the B"11- Print Room of the British Museum. GOYA I A CENTURY before the birth of Goya, Spanish painting had attained its crown of achievement in the work of the four great naturalists, Velaz quez, Ribera, Zurbaran, and Murillo. Josef de Ribera (' Lo Spagnoletto '), had succeeded Ribalta, and had given lasting expression to the realism which characterised Spanish art in the seventeenth century ; Francisco de Zurbaran, the Estremaduran peasant, whom Lord Leighton called ' All Spain,' carried on the tradition of the elder Herrera in his passion for truth in detail and in the dramatic intensity of his ex pression ; Murillo, the disciple of the Spanish Catholic Church, bewitched his generation with what Antonio Castillo y Saavedra described as his ' wondrous grace and beauty of colouring ' ; and Velazquez, 'our Velazquez,' as Palomino proudly styled him, was the supreme painter A 2 GOYA through whom Spanish art became the light of a new artistic life. Of Velazquez it has been said that he attained perfection in the realism of detail and in the realism of sight, and in his commanding genius Spanish art was emancipated from the fetters of pseudo-Italianism in which it had laboured so long. He carried Spanish realism to its Ultima Thule. Further his age could not go, and generations of artists who came after~ him devoted themselves to the imitation and repro duction of his colour and his technique with such passionate servility that in the end the copy of the pupil was frequently mistaken for the work of the master. The perfect technique of the great Court painter had, in his own day, the effect of arresting artistic development — it left his successors nothing to solve for themselves. He achieved so much in his own work that, for a time, the last word in art seemed to have been spoken. Until his influence had died away, the reproduction of Velazquez was the aim of the Madrid painters. For this reason, after the death of Velazquez, the artistic life of the seventeenth century became a spent force, and for want of new impetus of original genius Spanish art steadily declined. The followers of GOYA 3 the supreme painter failed to realise the true inwardness of his message. They had the seed, but they could raise no new flower. One feels towards the pictures of Velazquez as Swinburne felt towards the muse of Sappho : ' . . . earth's womb has borne in vain New things, and never this best thing again ; Borne days and men, borne fruits and wars and wine, Seasons and songs but no song more like mine.' But the reverent desire to perpetuate ' this best thing' could not arrest the decay of artistic in spiration. The disciples of Velazquez copied and painted successfully (up to a point), and they trained other generations of imitators who con tinued to work and teach their methods, until imitation slowly but surely sank into artistic degradation. Under the sway of Mariana of Austria, the decay of Spanish painting was further hastened, and the ascendency of the facile, brilliant brush of Luca Giordano, under Charles IL, dealt the death-blow to the realistic impulse that had carried the national school of the middle seventeenth century to the realisation of its utmost ambition. The decadence which followed the death of Velazquez was most pronounced among the 4 GOYA Castilian painters, but the empire of Giordano extended to the Provincial schools and completed the more gradual decline of art in Andalusia and Valencia. Seville was foredoomed to decadence as a school of painting, for its artists had taken Murillo as their model, and in servilely imitating the ' Painter of the Conceptions,' they emphasised his faults, exaggerated his unreality, and carica tured his affectations. The popular admiration of Murillo was all-powerful to hasten the general decline, and each year the artistic outgrowth of Andalusia became more enfeebled. jf In the last months of the seventeenth century Charles II. digd without issue and the art-loving Austrian dynasty was ended. The succeeding Bourbon sovereigns brought with them an art derived from France; they had no ambition to reanimate the native art of the country. Madrid became the only recognised art centre in Spain, and to Madrid, in 1761, came, at the invitation of Charles III., Giovanni Battista Tiepolo, the Venetian fresco-painter, and the Saxon pedant, Anton Raphael Mengs. The Spanish painters who had rendered homage to the facile Giordano were caught by the glamour of the fantastic, insincere art of Tiepolo, while the dreary academic influence of Mengs — whose GOYA 5 paintings are declared by Carl Justi to echo the last shadow of eclectic mannerism — made for all that is dull, exact, and lifeless in pictorial art. No great Spaniard arose to counteract the demoralising influence of these imported pro fessors ; it was realised in the studios of Madrid that the methods of the favoured aliens led tb popularity and fortune ; the Spanish artists followed the line of least resistance, nor desisted when they found that it carried them ever further from the tradition founded by Velazquez./ This art, dull but without dignity, showy but meaningless, was the reflex of the prevailing rottenness in the national life. During the reign of Charles III. a certain superficial decency was observed ; the corruptness of Court life was kept out of sight ; a general conspiracy of make- believe was maintained. But under Maria Luisa of Parma and Charles IV., the abomination of moral desolation in social, political and artistic life was complete and confessed. Manuel Godoy, afterwards Prince de la Paz, was Prime Minister of Spain, and the country was demoralised by dissolute courtiers and unscrupulous ministers, and drained by insatiable priests. But in the turmoil created by an aristocracy sunk in lasciviousness, a government steeped in cor- 6 GOYA ruption, and a commonalty beaten and bled into a state of nerveless resignation, was heard the echo of the revolutionary movement which was sweep ing over Europe. The teaching of Goethe and Schiller, followed by the preaching of Rousseau, had taken concrete form in the butcheries of Robespierre and Danton ; the movement had culminated in the personal supremacy of Napoleon Buonaparte. The hopes of the Spanish nation were centred in the Crown Prince Ferdinand. Even as the First of the Tigers thought to exterminate Fear by killing a man, the Spaniards believed that the abdication of Charles IV. would make an end of misrule and give their country peace and prosperity. But the King hated his son, and inspired by the double purpose of defeating the ambition of the Crown Prince and punishing the disloyalty of his subjects, he laid his crown at the feet of the Emperor of the French, who bestowed it upon his brother, Joseph Buonaparte. The Spanish liberals made the alien king welcome, but the Spanish loyalists proved a constant thorn in the side of the usurper, and at the end of five years Joseph Buonaparte fled Madrid. Two years later the Prince of the Asturias returned to Spain to be crowned king as Ferdinand vu.. GOYA 7 Again the distressful country was plunged into the depths of retrogression, clericalism, and fanaticism. Spain was undergoing her fate. The strong men of the troublous times of the eighteenth century were the revolutionaries and reformers, and, as was inevitable, they sprang from the people. Rousseau, Robespierre, Napoleon, these were the forces that directed the move ment, the effect of which was to make itself felt from one end of Europe to the other. /Goya was a revolutionary. He lived under four kings of Spain. He was elected a member of the Acad£mia de San Fernando in the reign of Charles in. ; Charles iv. appointed him Pintor de Cdmra del Rey; he took the oath of allegiance to Joseph Buonaparte, and painted the usurper's portrait ; Ferdinand VII., who declared that he had deserved death for his defection from the Bourbon cause, condemned the man but pardoned the artist and received him as a member of the new Court. ¦' Critical opinion condones Goya's flexible patriotism by the fact that 'it was a period of national disaster,' and that 'national calamity was not altered by these trivialities.' Goya, we are reminded, was a revolutionary; he was also a pitiless, if quizzical, onlooker at GOYA the life of the Madrid Court. It was a simple matter to him to transfer his allegiance from the Bourbons to Joseph Buonaparte, and it was even more simple to welcome Ferdinand vii. to the throne. 'What did such changes matter in years of irretrievable ruin?' writes C. Gasquoine Hartley, in A Record of Spanish Painting. The question may be left for the individual to answer according to his own fancy. And if Goya was, as some will find, an opportunist, a political weathercock, and a moral Vicar of Bray, as an artist he was a great reformative force. Alter- - nately an idealist and a realist, he fought with all the social forces and against the academic standards of the school commanded by David and Mengs, destroying the debased conven tions of painting and freeing the brush from the domination of a clique. A national artist par excellence, he gave lasting form to the sentiments, customs and conditions of his country. A pro found believer in empiricism, a great humourist, sometimes impetuous and fantastic, at other times holding fast to reality ; a master of portraiture ; fantastic, inspired, spontaneous in his aquafortis, etchings ; he seized upon and immortalised every aspect of the gruesome tragi-comedy which was played in Spain in the last years of the eighteenth century. GOYA 9 Francisco' Jose" de Goya y Lucientes was born at the end of March (the 30th or 31st) 1746 at Fuentetodos near Zaragoza, in Aragon, the province which gave to the nation poets like the ' Spanish Horaces,' historians like Zurita, teachers like Gracian and Luzan, a scholar like Latassa, and a statesman like the Conde de Aranda. Goya was baptized in the Church of Our Lady of the Ascent, and the names given him by his godmother, Francesca de Grasa, were Francis Joseph. The amiable weak ness for connecting great men with great families has prompted a German biographer to claim that both his father and mother belonged to the nobility, and that his first patron was the Duque de Fuentes. Less imaginative authorities, how ever, tell us that his parents, Jose" Goya and Gracia Lucientes, were poor but hardworking peasants, and that when ' the regenerator of the Spanish school of naturalistic painters ' — to quote the prefatory note to Goya's pictures in the Prado catalogue — had completed his course of elementary instruction at the hands of the vil lage schoolmaster, he was put to agriculture. A fortunate accident revealed the bent of the lad's genius and liberated him, at the age of fourteen, from the drudgery of manual labour. 10 GOYA M. Matheron relates that the lad had been sent with a sack of wheat to a neighbouring mill, when a monk of Zaragoza (probably Father Felix Salvador of the Carthusian con vent of Aula Dei) happened upon him. Goya, seated on his burden, was intent upon drawing a pig with a piece of charcoal upon a white washed wall. The priest, struck by the cor rect free lines traced by the youngster, inquired who his master was and received the charac teristic reply: 'I have none, your reverence. It is not my fault, I cannot keep from drawing.' The overmastering incentive pleaded by the youthful delinquent never forsook him, and, although powerful enemies resented his too free use of the pencil, and the Holy Inquisition was moved to curb his unwearied industry, he con tinued to ply brush and needle and gavel during sixty-eight years of changing, strenuous life. Father Salvador remained Goya's friend until his death. He saw his father, and obtained per mission from him, in 1760, for the lad to go to Zaragoza. The imperial city exercised a powerful influence upon his art. There is always in his pictures, as one of his countrymen points out, the Zaragoza landscape, so rich in the contrasts of its splendid and vigorous vegetation, recalling GOYA n the banks of the Genii or the Turia, while its limy hills and grey plains bring to the memory the vistas of Castile. The melancholy of the sky — pierced by the severe lines of innumerable towers and bounded by the austere distant rock — remind us that here the sun has not the same suggested warmth that supplied the rays for Murillo's brush ; that this is not the land of fancy but the land of genius, cold as the snow of the Moncayo, that adds beauty to the beau tiful plants which produce not sweet odours but I healing balsams. »* Thanks to the friendly offices of Father Salvador, Goya was admitted to the studio of Jos6 Luzan y Martinez, whose religious and historical pictures bear evidence of soft fresh colouring. He attended, too, the school founded in 1714 by the sculptor Juan Ramirez, a pupil of the well-intentioned Gregoria de Mesa. In the studio of Martinez, Goya, who from the first betrayed his lifelong passion for realism, worked with untiring ardour, stimulated, it may be, by the industry of his co-pupils, Jose" Beraton, Tomas Vallespin.and the Huescajeweller, Antonio Martinez, who founded, in Madrid, the silver smith's business which still' bears his name. ' In the schools of Zaragoza,' says C. Gasquoine 12 GOYA Hartley, ' he followed no conventional standards, and his continuous study was directed to the development of his exuberant individuality. /,To \ comprehend the truth, and afterwards to depict it, as it pleased his ever-varying fancy, this was his great aim. / His utterance was inevitable and instinctive, the overflow of his dramatic, inexhaustible and vivid imagination.' / Goya's exuberant, passionate temperament betrayed itself in other directions outside his art. He lived, as he worked, in a condition of uncon ventional, even arrogant independence.; Many tales of the wild escapades of his youth are told. His revolutionary tendencies embroiled him in frequent altercations ; thrice he is said to have fallen under the ban of the Inquisition. Zaragoza finally grew unsafe for him, and in 1766 he fled to Madrid. There are no discovered documents relating to his first years in Madrid, and his biographers, for the most part, preserve a dis creet reticence concerning his mode of life in the capital. It is supposed that he copied Velazquez, and the pictures at the Casa de Campo, the seat of the Duque de Arcos. It has even been surmised that, through his friend- ship with Bayeu, he had the entrde to the royal palaces of La Zarzuela, Aranjuez, and the GOYA 13 Escorial. Other writers favour the idea that he lived the life of a young revolutionary, and Richard Muther, in his monograph of the painter, pictures him 'wild and passionate, an athlete in his physical strength,' being ' everywhere present when dancing or love-making, scuffling or stab bing, is going forward.' The one outstanding fact, upon which most biographers are agreed, is that one morning he was found lying in the streets with a dagger in his back. This occurrence, supplemented, it is said, by his misfortune in again incurring the displeasure of the Inquisition — some hold that he was placed under police supervision — made him once more seek safety in flight. He had a will to visit Rome, but-no money to defray his travelling expenses. Tradi tion declares that he joined himself to a company of bull-fighters, worked his way to the coast as a picador, and set sail for Italy. Iriarte is the authority for most of the details concerning this period of Goya's career. French writers declare that the painter remained in Italy from 1769 to 1774. There is a full-length likeness of Pope Benedict XIV. still in the Vatican which is said to have been painted by Goya in a few hours, but as that pontiff died in 1756 there is much reason to doubt the truth of the legend. 14 GOYA The Conde de la Vinaza in his Life of Goya refutes every detail of this story. It is said that while Goya was in Italy he secured a prize offered by the Parma Academy of Fine Arts for a picture of ' Hannibal surveying Rome from a pinnacle of the Alps,' but the Conde maintains that Goya at this time was in Spain and that it was in his own country he painted his picture and carried off the second prize. In the Mercure de France of January 1772 we read : ' Le 27 Juin dernier l'Acad6mie Royale des Beaux Arts de Parme tint sa stance publique pour la distribution de ses prix. Le sujet de peinture etait : " Annibal vainqueur du haut des Alpes jette ses premiers regards sur les campagnes d'ltalie." . . . Le premier prix de peinture a 6t6 accorde au tableau qui avait devise : " Montes fregit aceto," et qui etait de monsieur Paul Borroni etc. Le second prix de peinture a 6t6 remporte" par M. Francois Goya romain (sic), 61eve de M. Vajeu, peintre du roi d'Espagne.' The following paragraph by M. Paul Mantz from the same source is quoted into the Archives de tart franeais : ' L'Acaddmie a remarque" avec plaisir dans le second tableau un beau maniement de pinceau, de la chaleur d'expression dans le GOYA 15 regard d'Annibal et un caractere de grandeur dans l'attitude de ce g6n£ral. Si M. Goya se fut moins £carte" dans sa composition du sujet du programme, et s'il eut mis plus de veVite' dans son coloris, il aurait balance" les suffrages pour le premier prix.' The Conde de la Viflaza, Goya's Spanish biographer, maintains that this picture was painted and the prize won before the artist went to Italy, and he proves, by the publication of documents preserved in the Archives of the Pilar Cathedral at Zaragoza, that in October 177 1 the painter, forsaking Madrid, was back on the banks of the Ebro in the enjoyment of an enviable _ reputation. This is in direct contradiction to the old stories describing a love adventure as the reason for his sudden and hasty departure from Rome. A mad enterprise which had for its object the rescue of a young maid from a convent ended, it is said, in his capture, and he ' only escaped the gallows by the most reckless and headlong flight.' This much we know, that , Goya was in Zaragoza in 1771. He returned not as a fugitive and an outlaw, but as a reputable citizen having the confidence of the Cathedral authorities, who commissioned him to paint the quadrangular vault in the Holy Chapel. The i 6 GOYA fresco which he prepared as a proof that 'he was experienced in this kind of painting,' was submitted to the Building Committee of the Cathedral, on November n, 177 1, together with the director's assurance that it had received the approval of experts, and with Goya's offer to paint the vault of the small choir for 15,000 reals, he providing the labourers and materials. The Committee, having heard this proposition and recognising it as better than that made by Don Antonio Velazquez, who asked 25,000 reals for the work, ' agreed to Goya's proposition, but in order to be safe and sure,' it was stipulated that he should make some further studies and submit them to Madrid for the approval of the Royal Academy of Fine Arts (San Fernando), * which obtained, the negotiations would be completed and the contract signed.' On January 27, 1772, Goya presented his study to the Committee, who having ' already been informed that it was a skilful piece of work in specially good style,' approved it, and waiving the stipulation that it should be submitted to the Royal Academy, they decided that the artist should forthwith proceed with the work. The documents give no information concerning the progress of the work, but we learn from a minute GOYA 17 in the Building Committee's meeting, held on June 1, 1772, that the painting of the choir was nearly finished by that date, and the scaffolding was about to be taken down. We are without any authentic particulars con cerning the next three years of Goya's life, but the Conde de la Viflaza supposes that with the 15,000 reals which this work brought hiin, he went to Italy. How he passed his time there cannot be definitely stated, but many interesting surmises have obtained currency. We are assured by Mr. Muther that for Goya ' the antique had no more existence than the magnificent art of the cinque-cento : what attracted him was rather the teeming life of the people. Out of the red robes of the priests, the costumes, gay with colour, of the women of Trastevere, the merry, careless freedom of the Lazzaroni, he created fragments of life, rich with all its varied colour. Muleteers with their jangling cars, religious processions and Carnivale masques,' to say nothing of much ' love-making, scuffling and stabbing ' — these are imagined to be the influences that directed his genius during his stay in Italy. Paul Lafond (Goya), while admitting the legendary element in most of the reported incidents in the life of the painter, repeats the stories of his ascending B 1 8 GOYA to the lantern in the dome of St. Peter's, of his making a tour of Cecilia Melella's tomb, walking upright on the narrow ledge of the cornice, of his amatory escapade at a convent and its resultant flight from Rome. He also adds that his genre pictures attracted so much attention in Rome that the Russian ambassador, instructed by his sovereign to invite a number of distinguished. artists to establish themselves at the Court at St. Petersburg, made Goya a very tempting offer, which he refused. On the other hand, the Conde de la Viflaza declares that 'he was frequently seen studying the most sublime fres coes in the land, leaning boldly on the decora tions ofthe architraves or on the most dangerous parts of the cornices ' ; that he secured the necessaries of life by the sale of pictures of the customs of his native land ; that he made the acquaintance of Luis David, for whom he formed a deep and lasting attachment ; and, finally, that ' the only recollection he preserved of Italy in his old age was of his having met there the painter of " The Rape of the Sabines." ' The friendship that existed between Goya and David has called attention to the similarities in the temperament and the aims of the two men, whose work was so widely different. Both used GOYA 19 their brushes to glorify the throne and received honours from kings ; both sacrificed tradition on the altar of new ideas; and both lacked the tender ness and the faith necessary in the treatment of religious subjects. David was the friend of Robes pierre and Saint Just, of Marat and Buonaparte ; he painted the ' Coronation of the Hero of the Pyramids ' ; he attended the Convention and voted for the death of Louis XVI. Goya was the friend of Godoy and of the ministers of Joseph Buonaparte ; he painted the pictures of the Usurper as well as those of the kings that preceded and followed him ; and he executed ' The Disasters of War ' and ' The Caprices.' David was ambitious for the aggran disement of his art, and Goya strove to make it worthy of its civilising mission, but they differed in the means by which they sought to attain their respective ends. David was in spired by the antique, and produced works which possessed the hardness of statuary as well as its clear-cut accuracy of form, while Goya went direct to nature for his inspiration, and his paintings are the reflections of naked reality.- The painter of ' The Death of Socrates ' was imbued with the guiding purpose of making his work dignified, elaborately accurate, and ex- 20 GOYA elusive, while the author of the frescoes of La Florida, drawing inspiration from the customs of the toilers and the dandies alike, held that 'a picture is finished when its effect is true.' David represented man endowed with improbable and unattractive virtues, Goya painted man as he was ; David idealised the individual form with classic grandeur, and his austere and solemn compositions, though based on observation of nature, were moulded to a fixed external idea ;/ but Goya was as faithful to psychologic truth as to anatomy, and his brush revealed the moral sentiments of man kind and laid bare the passionate and terrible emotions of the human soul./ When Goya returned to Madrid in 1775 Spanish art was directed by Mengs and Tiepolo, by Maella and Francesco Bayeu. Mengs, the ' reasoning artificer,' who had neglected the world of nature in his servile study of Raphael and the antique, was a painter who theorised much and invented little. According to Richard Cumberland he was an artist incapable of por traying either life or death; a painter whose creations neither terrify nor inspire passion or transport ; a timid, conscientious craftsman with an excellent hand for miniature. Yet Mengs, GOYA 21 the ' Spanish David,' as we are told by Jose" de Madrazo, was regarded by the youth of his time as ' the regenerator of the antique,' and from the dictatorial chair of pictorial art, his voice 'was heard like that of an oracle, not so much by the artistic cohorts of agitated Germany, where he received little attention, as by the peaceful Italo-Spanish pleiades, who applauded with enthusiasm the exhumation of the Hellenic form from among the ruins of Herculaneum and Pompeii, because it was the fashion, and without comprehending the reach of that fortuitous event.' In the fantastic, beautiful, but slightly handled compositions of Battista Tiepolo we have the reaction against this form of classicism. The Venetian possessed a fertile and brilliant fancy, his execution was free and daring, if at times careless, and, in addition, he had a wide know ledge of the resources of his art. His decora tions in the new palace at Madrid were ' extolled to the skies of a generation that had forgotten Velazquez.' Tiepolo got his effects rapidly; Mengs was laborious to a fault, but his work was probably a better guide for second-rate painters, themselves poorly equipped in knowledge, than the clearly (though incorrectly) drawn com- 22 GOYA positions of his Venetian contemporary. As director of the Acaddmia de San Fernando, Mengs suggested several new laws for the government of the students and certain altera tions in the methods of study. These were at first adopted, but in carrying them into effect the director seems to have met with opposition and involved himself in quarrels, which ' did little credit to the wisdom of his fellow-directors, or to his own temper and tact.' As a result of these dissensions Mengs failed to accomplish all his reforms, but he secured several important changes in the Academy. It was due to his efforts that plaster casts were taken of the statues discovered at Herculaneum. Charles III. dowered the in stitution with a rich collection of marbles and bronzes which had been presented to his Majesty by Mengs, and he supplemented this gift with a large number of statues and busts from the Museum of Cristina of Sweden, and with pictures from the royal galleries and from the suppressed houses of the Jesuits. The sovereign also formed a library for the Academy, opened a school of perspective (Royal Decree of August 19, 1766), and commissioned the surgeon Augustin Navarro to instruct the students in the science of nature and the human form. GOYA 23 In his efforts on behalf of the Academy, Mengs had the loyal assistance of Francisco Bayeu and Mariano Maella. The latter's pictures are deficient in invention, in vigour of execution, and in variety ; indeed his cold pearl-coloured creations have nothing to compensate their feeble and unimpressive handling and colour. Bayeu was gifted with peculiar intelligence and as an artist displayed fertility, capacity in composing a picture, and a skilful touch, but his designs lack vigour and delicacy, and his colour is disagreeable. When Goya reappeared in Madrid in 1775, Mengs was dictator , of art, and Bayeu was the Court painter. Goya's art owed nothing to con temporary influence or example, but to these two officials he was indebted for employment and for his wife. The young Aragonese knew nothing of the bitterness of long apprenticeship ; his rise in the esteem of the art world of Madrid was rapid. This, in a measure, was due to his genius, but his worldly prospects were assisted by his marriage to Josefa Bayeu, the sister of the Court painter, and by the influence of Mengs, which secured for him a commission to execute a series of designs for the tapestries woven at the Fabrica de Tapices de Santa Barbara. This first 24 GOYA series were designed for the decoration of the dining-room and bed-chamber of the Prince of the Asturias in the Palace of El Pardo. Goya delivered the first picture on October 31, 1776; on January 26, 1778, the tenth and last cartoon was delivered. Between 1776 and 1791 Goya executed the forty-six tapestry cartoons which now hang in the Prado, and he repainted many of his designs on a smaller scale for the Countess of Benavente at the Alameda. As late as 1802 the Santa Barbara factory wove tapestries from Goya's pictures, and up to 1832 some of the more favoured designs had been reproduced four times. Isabella II. presented some of these fabrics to King Leopold of Belgium, but the greater number adorn the royal palaces of Madrid, El Pardo, and the Escorial. The designs for tapestries which Goya com posed during this period of over twenty-five years form a large part of the painter's artistic output. It has been said that these early designs . do not exhibit any of the painter's predominant characteristics, and that they reveal crudeness and uncertainty. It is probable that Goya approached the task, in the first place, with very little knowledge of either the industry or the style GOYA 25 of design required from him. Mr. Rothenstein remarks that the models in the Prado are painted 'in so crude a key, and with so little regard for harmony of colouring, that their merit is apt to escape the attention of many students,' while the strong reds and yellows Goya employs in them have prompted Mr. Muther to compare them unfavourably with the 'tender delicate colouring' of Watteau and Lancret. Certainly Goya's designs are unequal in merit. It must be remembered, too, that often he had not the good fortune of being reproduced faithfully ; while other artists employed by the factory gained much by reproduction, his work almost invariably suffered in the process. The officials at the factory objected to the elaborate and delicate work which Goya submitted, and a beautiful model ('The Blind Man playing the Guitar ') was returned to him on the ground that it could not be successfully transferred to the threads of the warp. Goya corrected his design by exaggerating all the tints and he accentuated the figures by enclosing them in white outlines. This fact suggests one reason why Goya's enthu siasm in the employment speedily grew cool. We learn from the Palace archives that the officials, who were more concerned with the com- 26 GOYA mercial than the artistic side of the manufacture, declared that Goya's figures were 'dandies and girls with so much decoration of coifs, ribbons, fal-lals, gauzes, etc., that much time and patience is wasted on them, and the work is unproductive.' They contrived to remedy this defect by cover ing his figures with paintings of trees or clouds or anything else that made the tapestry easier and cheaper to produce, and this treatment was not calculated to make Goya more careful in the finish of his designs. It therefore follows of necessity that only occasionally among his later cartoons can one be found to compare with those in the first series, such, for instance, as 'The Picnic on the Banks of the Manzanares ' and ' The Dance at San Antonio de la Florida,' or indeed with any of the earlier designs, which were all remarkable for the vigour and animation of the scenes, the delicacy of colouring (despite an occasional surfeit of sienna and red ochre), the strength and freedom of the drawing, and the genius for natural and effective grouping in the composition of the pictures. Goya would appear in these works to be carried away by his imagination, and he has presented to us a masterly panorama of all that is brightest and most joyous in the national customs — a panorama GOYA 27 that puhsatesj^ithtj^ ^tan^usjmejnriment..-ajQd4ascinates with its irre sistible gaiety. We seem to hear the bells of the pony" chaise and the pleasant jokes of the wenches at the f6tes on the banks of the Man zanares ; the farces of Ram6n de la Cruz are translated into the language of colour. And the pictures with childreiv^iiappy, roguish young- ^sters—reveal not only marvellous skill, but IT sympathy with the poetry and charm of child hood that has not been surpassed. Zapater tells us that Goya was often seen surrounded by children in his house by the Manzanares, and his whole-hearted love of childish grace and innocence is manifested in these studies. Among his later work as a designer of tapestry one of the best examples is ' The Earthenware Stall,' which in jits ^delicacy of^c^QMagg, its skil ful arrangement of transparent draperies, and its '" brilliant 'lighti rig;!-; comparable with 'The Village Wedding,' which Cruzada declares to be the most graceful composition of the whole collection. Here the story is told with supreme humour. The stupid and happy youth in his finest attire walks beside his fresh-coloured bride who is bedecked with finery and ribbons, a priest and the parents and friends of the young couple 28 GOYA accompany them, and the village piper marches in front surrounded by a crowd of singing, shouting, dancing children. In beauty of colouring this design is the equal of the handsome, graceful figures in ' The Water-Girls,' and in its mirthful- ness and--featfsm"lt~~is a companion" lo h1§ illustration of ' Blind Mafl's . Buff,' which over- flows with irrepressiblemerrjrnenl. Another ftlAgiiiH^i^stpMIMbi^ i1'^1 urn-*** notable design which is also the largest that Goya painted, is ' El Agosto,' a striking piece of work. ' On contemplating this picture,' writes the Conde de la Viflaza — who declares that it entitles Goya to be known as the Theocritus, the Virgil, and the Garcilaso of painting — 'the sun seems to burn and asphyxiate with its fire, the reapers appear to be dazed with wine, and we seem to hear the chirping of a cricket hidden in the sheaves. Of the children crying and playing on the hills of straw, some appear to be the children of Van Dyck, and others the work of the expressive hand that created the weeping Ganymede.' The forty-six cartoons mentioned in the Prado catalogue — of which thirty-three are reproduced at the end of this volume — are now contained in the Goya Room of the Madrid Gallery. During the reign of Isabella II., Frederico de Madrazo, the GOYA 29 director of the Royal Gallery, repeatedly impor tuned the administrators of the Royal Patrimony to exhume the Goya designs from the cellars ofthe Tapestry offices to which they had been consigned, and to have them restored and housed in the Royal Museum. This request, however, was not conceded, and it remained for Gregorio Cruzada Villaamil to rescue them from the oblivion into which they had fallen. He succeeded in having the cartoons placed at the disposal ofthe Escorial Tapestry Museum Commission, and after being restored they were sent to the Prado. Unfor tunately the works are difficult to restore and quickly deteriorate ; for it was Goya's practice to sketch his pictures with extraordinary rapidity, to surround the whole with carbon, and then trace his figures with the aid of aqua rds. Many of the studies in the Prado are covered with glass in order to preserve from total loss the canvases on which scarcely any oil has been used beyond that contained in the colours. During these first years of his material pro sperity Goya varied his work for the tapestry factory by producing genre paintings and a few portraits. He also began at this time to exer cise his extraordinary powers as an engraver. As an exponent of genre he was unsurpassed, as 30 GOYA a portraitist he was excelled by Velazquez alone, but his genius is more certainly demonstrated in his aquafortis work than in either his genre studies, his frescoes, or his portraits. ' Goya was pre-eminently fitted, both by his environment and by his nature,' writes C. Gasquoine Hartley, ' to be the exponent of genre.' The truth of this dictum is patent to all who study his canvases of this period. The customs that he depicted were the customs that he loved ; the subjects, the people, and the passions represented are always real. He reveals both imagination and invention in the grouping and arrangement of the scenes. The vigour and boldness of his manner is revealed in the success with which he seizes, as with a camera, the fleeting movement — the unfinished smile, the arrested gesture — and seals it upon his canvas. His scenes of carnival and of merry makings, his representations of bull-fights, and his sidelights on the Inquisition, are living phases of the life which surrounded him and in which he found his pleasure and his inspira tion. The spirit of Goya is in all these pictures. His dramatic temperament, his fierce humour, and his imagination found their outlet in the life of the period and expressed itself in these paintings in which that life is immortalised. GOYA 31 In all that he painted Goya never lost sight of, if he did not always attain, his object of* securing absolute truth of effect. Whether he is employed on a portrait, a representation of romance or diablerie, or a religious fresco, he is true to the principle explained in his own remark that 'a picture is finished when its effect is true.'/ And the truth of 'his flashes of insight imprisoned in line and paint,' give his work a sense of modernity which is seen in the pictures of few other artists. M. Paul Lefond declares : ' More than any other painter of past periods he is made to be understood in our day. Something more and something better than a modern, the Aragon painter still remains a forerunner; he is still almost a contemporary of the generation to come. His manner of translating and inter preting nature is absolutely modern. He renders it as he sees it, with the comprehension of an artist of our time, daring and independent. He is more than a hundred years in advance of his century. His manner of portrait-painting is completely outside all theory of teaching; his fashion of "treating frescoes is an extraordinary audacity. He has in his whole existence, without truce or compromise, been pursued by this idea of arriving at the true expression of life.' 32 GOYA / It has been claimed for Goya that his genius was arrogantly unsubjective ; that he had no master and was contemptuous of all rules. Originality and independence could go no further, and it may be admitted that he was intolerant of out side influence. /But the spark of genius must be fanned into flame by the magnetic influence of example, and while Goya studied nature with a passionate and jealous devotion, he glories in the debt he owes to Rembrandt and Velazquez. ' I have had three masters,' he wrote to a lite rary friend, ' Nature, Velazquez, and Rembrandt.'y Some have tried to recognise in him a disciple of Tiepolo, and his study of the aquafortis engravings of the Venetian may well have sug gested his adoption of that so long neglected method of engraving, but as we should expect, he preserved an independent attitude of mind and developed a manner quite different from that of Tiepolo. There is no evidence, in his engravings, of any admiration for Tiepolo's style, but his admiration of Rembrandt was as sincere as was his devotion to Velazquez. Gautier finds that Goya's work reminds one of Velaz quez and Rembrandt, 'as a son reminds you of his ancestors, without any servile imita tion — or rather, more by certain congeniality of GOYA 33 taste than by any formal wish.' ,' Goya's love for the old masters,' says Lafond, 'is the best proof one can give of his sincerity. He did not think of inventing new processes ; conscious that the same language is capable of a variety of ex pressions, he was content to master the technique of the past and to borrow from it all that best suited his individuality.' But what he borrowed he moulded and modified to suit his own pur poses ; translating it into a language which was his own and in the process enlarging it with new and further life. / In 1779 Goya presented to the King his plates after the pictures of Velazquez. This series, which consisted of the portraits of Philip III., Philip IV., Margaret of Austria, Isabella of Bour bon, Prince Baltasar Carlos, the Count-Duke of Olivarez, and other etchings, are faithful though not inspired copies of the master. Goya wrote to Zapater that he had had the honour of being received by his Majesty and family when he submitted the plates for their inspection, and he adds, ' I could not have wished them to' be more pleased than they showed themselves to be on seeing them.' Herr Valerian von Loga, who has an intimate acquaintance with and profound knowledge C 34 GOYA of Goya's etchings and lithographs, has just published in Berlin a series of thirty-two repro ductions of the rarest examples of the painter's work in these media. The explanatory notes which accompany the plates are of great inter est both to the student and the collector. This writer assumes that Jose" del Castillo, who worked with Goya for the tapestry factory of Santa Bdrbara, urged him to devote some of his restless activity to the etching needle. He holds that in his earlier attempts, and particu larly in ' The Flight into Egypt,' the technique reminds one of Tiepolo. This etching is the work of an apprentice hand, and while it is not devoid of charm, it runs on bad lines. Goya's acquaintance with the fundamental rules of etching was so imperfect that, in the first prints of his ' St. Francisco de Paula,' the inscrip tion C. A. R. J. appears turned the wrong way. It is the opinion of Herr Valerian von Loga that in almost all the plates executed at this period there is a certain emptiness and un steadiness of drawing, while the unsuccessful handling of light and shade betrays the work of the beginner, but ' what is new and original, and above all, characteristic of Goya, is the manner in which the whole is worked out according to GOYA 35 the painter's mode of working. We see the artist taking pains, not to give form to the things them-' selves, but to their appearance. On this account outlines are omitted and contours left open, and there are no regularly-growing, flowing lines, ! while parallel and crossing strokes are rare. The : dark surfaces are composed of a great number of short, chopped-off strokes ; the entire workman ship is nervous and undecided. It is clear here that the ability of the artist was far behind the good-will, and at times too his inspiration was insufficient.' ' In his copies of Velazquez Goya appears to have been the first to introduce into Spain Le Prince's ten-year-old process of aquatinta, a process which in later times he developed to the highest perfection. In 1779 he brought out an etching from one of his own designs for the tapestry factory. His work so pleased the Prince of the Asturias, for whom it was executed, that the painter is credited with an intention of publishing all his Santa Barbara pictures as etchings. But his growing popularity as a portrait painter now claimed his activities for more remunerative work, and for more than ten years he laid aside the etching needle in favour of the brush. 36 GOYA We learn from a memorial preserved in the Palace Archives that the graciousness of his reception, the success of his tapestry designs, and the admiration that Charles III. had expressed for his two religious studies of ' Christ Crucified ' and of 'St. Francis,' emboldened the artist to proffer himself for the position of Court Painter. This honour was denied, but he was elected a member of the Acad£mia de San Fernando. On January 24, 178 1, Goya left Madrid for Zara goza to assist in the redecoration of the Church del Pilar under the direction of his brother-in- law, Francisco Bayeu. The dissensions which arose out of this commission between Bayeu and Goya, and between -Goya and the Building Com mittee, were bitter and prolonged. It is not likely that the biographers of Goya, without the facts of the dispute to guide them to a correct conclusion, would display much sympathy with a conventional, mediocre painter like Bayeu, or so nebulous a body as an archbishop's chapter, and Zapater and Cru^ada have revealed their hero in the light of a persecuted, long-suffering martyr. The vanity and envy of Bayeu and the wilful obstinacy of the Building Committee in their support of the older artist they hold to GOYA 37 have been at the bottom of the matter. But the Conde de la Viflaza has exhumed the hard facts in the archives ofthe Pilar Cathedral, and from these it is now clear that the/indomitable indepen dence of Goya's nature and his impetuous intolerance of all restriction] have not been taken sufficiently into account by his biographers. -- From the documents which Viflaza has brought to light we learn that the frescoes which Bayeu completed in the Pilar Church, in 1776, gave so much satisfaction to the authorities that they agreed to the artist's terms for painting the round vaults and cupolas of the church. Four years later, when the Building Committee were getting impatient for the work to be put in hand, they granted Bayeu permission to engage his brother Ramon and his brother-in-law Goya to assist in the execution of the designs which he had already prepared. On October 5, 1780, Ramon Bayeu and Goya presented these designs for the vaults. The Committee found that they were 'inspired by the greatest taste' and decided to proceed at once with the work. It may be assumed that Francisco Bayeu arrived shortly after to supervise the operations of his assistants, and it was not long before the dis agreements between Goya and his brother-in-law 38 GOYA commenced. On December 14 Bayeu com plained that Goya would not be subject to correction in the manner of his painting, and he asked the Committee that he might be relieved of his responsibility in the direction of the work, in so far as Goya was concerned. We read that ' the Committee, taking into account that Goya had come to paint, owing in a great measure to the pressure and eulogy of Bayeu in his letters, agreed that the Building Director (Canon Allu£) should see Goya and his painting frequently, and mention any defects he might notice and impress upon him how grateful he ought to be for the good offices of D. Francisco Bayeu in engaging him as his assistant.' Although it is evident that Goya was already in revolt against the supervision which he had accepted as a condition of his employment, the trouble was temporarily overborne. From this we may conclude that the good Aliud did not insist too much upon the gratitude which Goya owed to his brother-in-law. By February Goya had completed the painting of the dome, and he then submitted his studies for the four triangles formed by the arches supporting it. It would appear that the public had expressed their dissatisfaction with Goya's compositions in the dome, and the GOYA 39 Committee complained that not only were these new designs marked by similar defects of 'drapery, colouring, and idea,' but one of the figures repre sented came short of the standard of chastity that was required in pictures of this kind. The Committee, 'fearing to expose themselves to fresh censure and an accusation of negligence and want of care, put this matter, by reason of the confidence he had won from the Committee and from the whole chapter, under the direction and in the hands of D. Francisco Bayeu, hoping that he will take the trouble to see these studies and say whether the observations of the Com mittee are just in deciding that the triangles be painted in such a way that they may be shown to the public without fear of criticism.' But when this resolution of the Committee was com municated to Bayeu, he retaliated with a tirade upon his offended dignity, and we find Allue" appealing to Goya to ' see if there be any way of arranging the matter, knowing that the Com mittee desire harmony, and do not wish to expose their conduct to censure, but desire only that the work be skilful and perfect.' To this appeal Goya returned what we may describe as a characteristic letter. This epistle has been published in Spain, but no transla- 40 GOYA tion has hitherto appeared in England. The letter is as follows : — Memorial of Goya to the Building Committee. D. Francisco de Goya, Member of the Royal Academy of San Fernando, respectfully shows : That after having put the works of his profession before the public, namely, the paintings just unveiled at the Church of Our Lady of Pilar, his attention had been called to the opinions he hears expressed, containing a criticism prompted by a principle other than that of justice, or governed by the authorised rules of art, which only should form the opinion regarding the work; and although he cannot believe that ill-meant prejudice has gained access to your rectitude, or that you could be led away by impulses little in accord with reason ; yet the honour of a professor is a very delicate thing ; opinion is what sustains him, all his subsistence depends on his reputation, and when that is obscured by even a light shadow, his fortune is gone ; therefore Nature warns him to take care of it by using all the defences within his reach, and to omit the least would be to gain a slight advantage by abandoning the greatest treasure the Creator had entrusted to him. These principles, accompanied by a sense of wounded honour, the expositor hopes his explanation will make evident to your benignity. D. Francisco Bayeu asked that the work in the domes might be done by his brother and the expositor, but it was on the understanding that the latter should do one of the parts by himself, as Bayeu himself GOYA 41 agreed, considering that the degree of an honoured member of the San Fernando Academy, acquired by the work which had won great renown for him in Madrid, in addition to the work for H.M., would not admit of his absolute subordination to another pro fessor without detriment to his honour. The expositor might be wrong in this, but his error would have the approbation of D. Francisco Bayeu himself, who agreed to it, and was a trustworthy witness of the success that might be expected ; and also that of the chief Presbyter Allue, to whom through some people in the city he had manifested the same opinion, to which he agreed. The expositor feeling sure of said promises, with all good faith in them, proceeded with the Study or Design, and as he wished to be on good terms with D. Francisco Bayeu he took it to him, and received his entire approval : he came with him to this city : he began his work by consulting him regarding the place where the principal facade should be put ; the expositor gave way to Bayeu's opinion. He presented the design to you, who approved them ; and in executing them he has only enlarged them. Taking into consideration these harmonious dealings of the supplicant with D. Francisco Bayeu, which created no motive for resentment, and were governed by the principles and rules prescribed in the first and only conversations regarding the matter, who could think that the expositor had been wanting in respect to Bayeu ? There are those who think so, because when the work was well in hand, they wished to make him understand that the agreement with Bayeu was that he should interfere as much as he liked with the 42 GOYA expositor's work, and that the latter should obey him as a subordinate in execution, placing of figures, style, colouring, and so forth ; in a word make him a mere executor and mercenary subordinate ; but as this was in direct opposition to what had been agreed, it would have been discreditable to his honour to yield, as he would be losing what his merit had won for him, and he could not therefore so humiliate himself, for he knew that the previous offices were sufficient, and that similar ones if continued would not make them anything but his own production. D. Francisco Bayeu's warn ing to you that he would not be responsible for his part of the work, only shows that his object was to create a want of confidence that should cause coercion to be exercised, which was justly resisted, for doubt as to skill and success sat ill on D. Francisco, who knew quite well of the honours acquired by the expositor in Madrid, both from the Royalties and from all who had seen his productions, all executed by himself without the slightest direction from any one. After this, things were artfully circulated against the conduct of the expositor, concerning his temper, pro ceedings and dealings with Bayeu, he being accused of hauteur, pride and stubbornness. Thereafter malice prepared the blow, long premeditated, of first creating personal disaffection, and then disaffection with his work ; as shown by the reception of his work in the dome of the Cathedral of Our Lady. The criticism passed by some persons can only be attributed to this, because all its merit is unobserved and only the defects suggested by caprice or ignorance . are sought. GOYA 43 He has suffered with resignation the insults to his honour, he has had the patience to see that the same Bayeu who impaired his credit with insinuating words, and the deceitful complaint that he was responsible for the success of the work, and that he would have to give an account of the confidence placed in him, and that the supplicant was depriving him of this satisfac tion because he would not allow him to correct or alter his productions ; on other occasions defended the expositor, exalting his merit, acknowledging his skill and the correctness of his painting. The insinuations of Bayeu have led to the conclu sion that the expositor came to this city as a mere subordinate of his, and that notwithstanding this absolute dependence, his proud spirit would not sub mit to asking for instructions from D. Francisco, even on the ground of friendship and relationship, Two entirely false propositions, which are the cause of all the supplicant's trouble, because regarding the first he has already told you about the agreements that pre ceded his coming to Zaragoza, and regarding this and the second, D. Francisco Bayeu cannot deny that, as the result of those agreements, the expositor executed the studies and designs in Madrid, showed them to him, received his approval, and no fault was found. The studies are the complete work, with the same figures, colouring and arrangement to be observed, and the work itself an entire copy of them ; and if they passed his examination in Madrid as an act of condescension on the part of the supplicant, emanating from his desire for peace, why, if as he says he was responsible, did he not then point out the defects he 44 GOYA might have noted? He did not do so ; then what is to be inferred from his having concealed them, if he noticed them ? Obviously, and no dissimulating artifice can hide this, it may be gathered that his object was for the expositor to be in error, receive indignant public censure, and lose all the merit and status won by his work. But not wishing to believe such malevolence, because other proofs would be required of it, it must be admitted either that he found no defects in the studies or designs, and therefore the painting on the dome, which is the same, has none, or that D. Francisco was most culpable who, knowing of them, said nothing and allowed them to be copied. The expositor has never departed from that friendly subordination, nor attempted to oppose D. Francisco Bayeu with the proud spirit of which he is accused ; a proof of this is what has been said about the designs ; another, the placing of the principal facade ; and, lastly, the many visits he paid him at his own house, even though they were not returned. On being informed that the Chapter wished Bayeu to inspect the work on the dome, he arranged for him to do so, which he did, accompanied by the chief Presbyter Alkie, and in his presence admitted and acknowledged the perfection of the work, saying that what he had been informed was not true ; he also saw the designs for the triangles, and approved of them. In face of all this, the expositor finds that the same bitter opposition which he had thought would cease, still continued, because the sense of truth may be sus pended but not extinguished, but seeing that there is no hope of staying the torrent of provocations that GOYA 45 insult his honour and fame, and that an honoured professor cannot stand for ever against the opposition of his enemies, whose only object is to work him ill ; notwithstanding that he thought he must finish the work on the triangles, he_ has at last been unde ceived by the letter which the chief Presbyter Allue had just sent to him, of which he sends you a complete copy. After the calumnies he has had to endure, the slights and contempt with which he is treated will not permit him to continue to expose himself to some greater misfortune. He now humbly shows, and at the same time sets forth that he has heard that some figures were to be altered in the dome, and although the expositor cannot be sure that you will allow your selves to be guided by the declamatory voice of the ignorant public, or the opinion of rivals, the right he has to defend his honour leads him to .forestall you. Before a daub is put in the Church that will obscure and deprive it of merit, and leave a permanent witness of the ignorance which is a reproach : which is now the only thing in the matter that interests him, and regard ing which he appeals to you — because the will of the owner in his own house does not let go the reins of liberty to such an extent, merely in order to exercise his authority, as to permit without cause, and quite uselessly, great detriment to another on a point so delicate as honour — the expositor thinks the best way to appease the want of confidence he presumes in others and to assert his own opinion, is that a person expert in the art, authorised in his profession, and whose opinion would be impartial, should minutely inspect the work, and when his criticism detects his 46 GOYA unskilfulness and error, or testifies to his sufficiency and skill, he will watch with indifference any mutilations executed. Therefore he humbly begs that you will arrange for the work in the dome to be seen by one of the members of the San Fernando Academy, one of the most renowned, as D. Mariano Maella or D. Antonio Velazquez, at the expense of the expositor, and after careful inspection his declaration be accepted as testimony. — Zaragoza, March 17, 17S1. Francisco de Goya. Upon the receipt of this letter, which may be left to speak for itself, the worthy and sorely tried Allue seems to have invited the mediation of Father Salzedo, who was, perhaps, the only man to whom the irascible Goya might be expected to listen. Salzedo wrote the painter a long, earnest epistle, in which he appealed to his better judgment and prudence, cited instances of humility in the life of Christ for his guidance, and demonstrated the practical advantages that would be derived from doing his work to the satisfaction of the Building Committee. The good father did not hesitate to tell his friend that he had taken up a wrong attitude towards his brother-in-law and the Cathedral authorities, and -plainly exhorted him ' with all generosity and Christian charity, to submit your studies to Bayeu's opinion, in order to please God by your GOYA 47 humility, edify the public, and give pleasure to your friends.' And he adds in conclusion : 'My dictum, as your greatest admirer, is that you submit to the demands of the Committee, have your studies taken to your brother's house, and say to him in the best manner possible : This is required by the Chapter — here they are ; examine them to your satisfaction, and put your opinion in writing, doing this as God and your conscience shall dictate, etc. And then await the result.' The foregoing letter was dated March 30, 1781. On April 6, Goya wrote a conciliatory note to Allue, promising to make fresh studies in consultation with Bayeu. Eleven days later the Committee approved the new designs and expressed their pleasure at finding him recon ciled to his brother-in-law. But the truce, for such one supposes it to have been, did not last. From a minute in the report of the Building Committee's proceedings on May 28, it is re corded that Goya, in a ' not very courteous ' manner, had told Aliud that he was only losing his reputation in Zaragoza and desired per mission to return to Madrid as soon as possible : 'The Committee resenting this further affront, resolved : First, that the Professor be paid for 48 GOYA his painting. Second, that under no circum stances would he be permitted to continue to paint any more in this Church, but that this need not deter the Director from giving some medals to his wife, in virtue of her being the sister of D. Francisco Bayeu, who was so worthy of this and other considerations from the Committee, by reason of his skilful work in this church.' The source of the trouble was the failure of the Committee to accept Goya at his own estimate, which was certainly the true one, as the superior of Bayeu. The young painter doubt less did his best to follow the advice of Father Salzedo, but he wore the robes of humility with a bad grace, and was impatient of ignorant and pedantic criticism. His position had become untenable. The painter received his payment, his wife accepted her medals, and they left Zara goza for Madrid in June 178 1. Goya was indulging no empty boast when he intimated, in his memorial to the Building Com mittee, that his renown in Madrid was widely acknowledged. He was no sooner back in the , capital than the Conde de Florida Blanca sent him a royal order to paint one of the pictures for the Church of San Francisco el Grande. The favoured minister also presented him to the GOYA 49 Infante don Luis, the brother of the King and husband of Maria Teresa Vallabriga, who at once conceived a great liking for the painter. He spent a month at the palace of Arenas de San Pedro, and was entertained with great hospitality, while he executed portraits of the Infante's family. He also painted for the Consejo de las Ordenes several devotional pictures for the Calatrava College at the Salamanca University. In his leisure hours he worked at his picture in the Church of St. Francis. This work was not completed until November 1784. The pictures were ceremoniously unveiled on the 8th of December, in the presence of the King and his court. The occasion was a triumph for Goya. Other pictures had been painted by Bayeu, Mariano Maella, Gregorio Farro, Antonio Velaz quez, Joseph del Castillo, and Andres Calleja. But their work was eclipsed by the composition in which the magic brush of the Aragonese represented San Bernardino de Siena. The saint is shown with a crucifix in his hand, standing on a rock, preaching, by the light of a brilliant star, to the wonder-filled King Alfonso of Aragon and his court. Great was the admiration which this picture won for the artist, but, as was usual in Spain, he D 50 GOYA experienced much difficulty in obtaining payment for his work. In April 1785 we find Goya, Farro, and Castillo memorialising the Conde de Florida Blanca for pecuniary acknowledgment of their labours, explaining that they had each spent two years in making sketches and studies and in the execution of their several pictures, and pointing out that they are obliged to gain their livelihood with their work and 'have no income or assist ance, like others who have the good fortune to serve his Majesty.' This memorial was despatched with a covering letter from Antonio Ponz, who emphasises the fact that the painters are in need, and hopes that their request will be complied with, ' in order that these poor men may not lose heart and that reward shall hearten them to fresh work.' Three months late Florida Blanca arranged with the general directors at the post-office to hand the artists ' six thousand reals for the present until something else is arranged.' This payment is duly noted on the memorial, and a later marginal order, presum ably in the Count's handwriting, reads : ' Pay another 4000 reals to each, although the pictures are nothing wonderful, but theirs are the best.' This grudging eulogy was in striking contrast with the enthusiastic praise bestowed upon GOYA 51 Goya's pictures for the Salamanca College by the Consejo de las Ordenes, who instructed Jove- Llanos to assure the artist that he was ' singu larly satisfied with the care and diligence with which he had finished the paintings and with their eminent merit.' In the year of his return to Madrid Goya's father died, and the painter sent for his mother and his brother Camilo to join him. He obtained for Camilo a chaplainship at Chinchon, but his mother soon wearied of the unaccustomed noise and bustle of the city and retired to Zaragoza, where she lived on a pension of five reals per diem provided by Goya. The artist at this time may have found some difficulty in providing for his household ; for his family, if not long-lived, , was numerous, but it is unlikely that he ever felt the pinch of poverty. We can well believe that he was insistent in obtaining the reward of his labours, especially when he was working for princes who, in his view, were living a life of gilded pauperism, and the stress which Ponz lays upon the needs of these ' poor men ' is far removed from the attitude assumed by Goya. In the letter, in which he applies for payment, he does not plead for a dole in relief of his poverty, but demands the remuneration which 52 GOYA is justly due to him. This is the only recorded instance of his being in financial straits. From this time his career is one of eventful and inter rupted but assured success. Fame and fortune attended him on either hand. In 1785 Andreas Calleja died, and Goya succeeded him as deputy director of the Academy of San Fernando, with an annual salary of twenty-five doubloons. Four years later, on the death of Cornelio van der Goten, Charles IV., who had just succeeded his father Charles III., appointed him a Painter of the Chamber, with a salary of 15,000 reals, which was increased in 1799 to 50,000 reals a year, with the rank of first painter to the King. In this period of his greatest prosperity, Goya was courted not only for the sake of his art, but also for his personal qualities. He was popular with men, while women eagerly con tended for his favour. A revolutionary, he became the friend of the King, while the Queen and the Countess of Benavente delighted in his companionship. He went from palace to palace and from fele to f6te, observing, working, study ing, revelling in the life by which he was sur rounded and in which he played a full part. This lover of freedom could breathe in an atmosphere of corruption ; this son of the soil GOYA 53 could play the courtier with a will. ' If we are to understand his genius rightly,' says C. Gas quoine Hartley, in A Record of Spanish Paint ing, 'all contradictions are solved when we realise that he was an onlooker at, rather than an operator in, many incidents of his life.' This half-hearted attempt to condone the irregularity of his life at this period is at variance both ' with what we know of Goya's temperament and with the facts. He was an actor as well as an interpreter of the scenes which he represents, and many of his pictures, which are regarded as biting satires of the follies and vice of his age, are quite as plausibly explained as the expression of personal animus and party feeling. Certain people have discovered in Goya a moralist after the style of Hogarth, using his brush in the sacred cause of morality, to expose the vices of his time, laying bare the baseness of his contemporaries in order to inspire contempt and horror of their conduct, stigmatising the habits of the court of Charles IV, and castigat ing the hypocrisy, ignorance, and immodesty of the men and women who surrounded the royal family. But while in the later works of his mature age he employed his brush and needle to this purpose, it is more probable, as Lafond 54 GOYA concludes, that under Charles IV. and Maria Luisa, Goya drew and engraved, as La Fontaine wrote his fables: for the pleasure of producing them, from the necessity of multiplying them, not troubling himself about questions of morality or of the lessons which his pictures should teach. ' The truth is,' says his French biographer, ' that, mixed up in the intrigues of the Court and in volved in personal quarrels, he takes the part now of one, now of another, using his pen to scratch his adversaries of to-day who are his allies to-morrow.' In all his works he imbued the subject with the quality of his thought as well as with the charm of his colour and the skill _of his draughtmanship. Of all the artists of his class, says the Boletin de la Sociedad EspaMola de Excursiones, none put into their studies more meaning and personal opinion. If he painted a scene he attached to it a proverb or a significant ejaculation ; if he produced a portrait he left upon the likeness his opinion of his model ; if in many cases it amounted to a positive caricature, he could no more help seeing his subject in that guise than his subject could avoid so appearing to the artist. With regard to Goya's personal life at this period it is not necessary to say much, but it GOYA 55 would seem to have been consistent with our knowledge of him and of his surroundings. Lafond reminds us that his wife bore him twenty children and continued to love him in spite of his endless infidelities. Mr. Rotherstein de clares that while it would be idle to pretend that he was faithful to his wife, it is undeniable that he was deeply attached to her during her lifetime. With the single exception of his devotion to the unfortunate Duchess of Alba,- says the same writer, his intrigues seem to have been as much caprices on the part of his sitters as his own. But these caprices were, as it has been said, endless. ' We have only to look at the master's self-portrait,' writes Richard Muther, ' at this man with the bull-neck and full, sensual lips, to understand that the countless stories which got about on the subject of his relations with the women of high society in Madrid were not all inventions of the fancy. Goya must have been a terror to all their husbands. In all the most aristocratic salons the women were at his feet ; and perhaps they appreciated the differ ence between this sturdy man of the people and their decadent lords and masters. In a word, Goya at this time not only painted Rococo, but lived himself to its full the wild passionate life 56 GOYA of that Rococo period.' And again, in the Boletin de la Sociedad EspaMola de Excursiones, we get the shrewd and common-sense conclusion that ' Goya was a man of his age. He neither aspired to the category of an ascetic nor opposed- the customs and tendencies of his time, and his age being one of transition, without fixed prin ciples, he accommodated himself to its duties and its weaknesses, never for a moment failing in his domestic obligations, yet not refusing those outside favours that presented themselves to him.,-' It would have been strange indeed if Goya had resisted the temptations by which he was surrounded ; it is remarkable under the circum stances that he remained unspoiled. The King, as we have seen, was his friend, the Queen con fided to him her most delicate secrets, the all- powerful Prince de la Pax made him welcome at Aranjuez, and the most distinguished women of the day delighted in entertaining him. Writ ing to his friend Zapater about his success at this period, he said : ' I had established for myself an enviable mode of life ; I no longer danced attendance in an ante-chamber; if any body wanted anything of mine he had to come to me. I was much sought after, but if it was not anybody in a high position, or to oblige a friend, GOYA 57 I worked for none.' He was a privileged guest at the palaces of the Marchioness of Santa Cruz and of San Carlos ; Brunetti and the Countess of Benavente f£ted him. His relations with the beautiful and vivacious Duchess of Alba are too well known to call for more than a passing mention. The artist painted at least a dozen portraits of the Duchess, in one of which he presents himself in company with his inamorata. He introduced her piquant features into the frescoes of San Antonio de la Florida. She is the model for the nude and clothed Maja which hang in the Prado Museum. Tradition has it that the clothed Maja was painted to meet the wishes of the Duke, who expressed a desire to inspect the master's work. The story is almost comical to any one who has stood in front of the two pictures. Nothing but the most con ventional views upon the subject of the nude could make the naked study more offensive in the eyes of a husband than the one in which the young woman, ' naked in spite of her dress,' appears to challenge the continence of all the St. Anthonys of Christendom. Of these pictures Mr. Charles Ricketts writes in an illuminating chapter on The Masterpieces of the Prado : ' Goya's two pictures are still vivacious 58 GOYA and fresh. In " La Maja," a nude, he has painted the sensuous waist, the frail arms, the dainty head of the Duchess thrown upon pillows, contrasting in their gray whiteness with the gleam upon her flesh. In the other we note the same grace of pose, a more summary workman ship, touches of colour — too many perhaps. The Duchess of Alba (La Maja) reclines on her divan in her rich bolero and white duck trousers of a toreador or Spanish dandy. We pause, we are astonished and charmed ; we wonder how such a thing was possible. Her beauty and daring live on the two canvases ; this one scandal in the nineteenth century has endowed the world with those pictures, and they are now in the Prado. So ends the adventure.1 The scandal which associated Goya's name with that of the Duchess of Alba, fanned, it may be suspected, by the jealousy of the Countess of Benavente, could not be concealed, and by the order of Maria Luisa, the Duchess was banished in 1795 to the seclusion of her estate at San Lucar. The painter immediately obtained from the King a prolonged leave of absence and accompanied her into exile. On the journey to San Lucar an accident happened to their carriage, and Goya with his characteristic energy set to GOYA 59 work to repair the defect. An iron bar belong ing to the coach was buckled ; a fire had to be lighted and the iron made straight. The heat and the unwonted exertion which the operation entailed was followed by a chill, and from this chill resulted the deafness which, in later years, became complete. The Duchess was recalled in the following year — this exercise of royal clemency being apparently the only means of securing' the return of the painter to Madrid — and died in the same year in the fullness of her exquisite and inspiring beauty. The period of Goya's greatest popularity (1780- 1 800) was the period of his greatest activity. ; He was high in the favour of the Court. Much of his time was absorbed in painting portraits of his royal and aristocratic patrons. At the same time he never lost touch with the commonalty, nor his powers to depict, with sympathy and understanding, the life of the country — the bustling, laughing, loving, wrangling, vibrating life he loved and to which, by birth and temperament, he belonged. It is probable that he was never a courtier at heart. His effrontery and uncompromising independence, combined with incisive wit and physical strength, made him at once a singular and incongruous 60 GOYA but popular figure in the Court circles, while his frank camaraderie and his amazing prowess in the national games and feats of strength, and above all, the boldness and skill of his demeanour in the bull-ring — in which he is said to have been the equal of the professional espada — won for him the enthusiastic admiration of the hero- worshipping people of Madrid. He seems to have been at no pains to disguise the real bent of his nature. The story runs that he would frequently leave the royal palace to pass the night in the most disreputable taverns and bodegas in the suburbs of Madrid, drinking, dicing, and merry making with the night-birds of the capital. But Goya's artistic output showed no signs of falling off either in quality or amount, and his marvellous rapidity of workmanship enabled him to produce an almost incredible number of canvases. In a biography and review of this size and scope it is not possible to present a leisured review of his pictures. We must be content with a brief notice of the more important among them, but the illustrations at the end of the volume which are produced in such wealth, and which constitute the chief interest of this book, will speak more eloquently than words. Of Goya's methods of painting many stories are GOYA 6jU told, from which it might be concluded that he employed for the purpose every instrument known to art with the solitary exception of a brush. Gautier, who declared his mode to be as eccentric as his talent, has exhausted all the facts and legends relating to his brush-work (if so it can be called) in the following vivacious descriptive passage : ' He kept his colours in tubs, and applied them to the canvas by means of sponges, brooms, rags, and everything that happened to be within his reach. He put on his tones with a trowel, as it were, exactly like so much niortar, and painted touches of sentiment with large daubs of his thumb. From the fact of his work ing in this offhand and expeditious manner, he would cover some thirty feet of wall in a couple of days. This method certainly appears some what to exceed even the licence accorded to the most impetuous and fiery genius ; the most dashing painters are but children compared to him. He executed, with a spoon for a brush, a painting of the " Dos de Mayo," where some French troops are shooting a number of Spaniards. It is a work of incredible vigour and fire.' The vigour and fire which Gautier finds in this picture is to be observed in varying degree in 62 GOYA all Goya's works. These qualities were the results of his temperament, which moved him to fling his ideas upon the canvas before they could escape him, and imbued him with a con stant desire to be rid of them and at work on something else. ' His whole art,' says Muther, ' seems like a bull-fight ; for everywhere he sees before him some red rag, and hurls himself upon it with the fury of the tore' /Nor did his sitters escape the consequences of his impetuosity. Many of his portraits were painted in a day, but the sitting lasted not a few hours merely but the whole of the day, during which time, Mr. Rothenstein tells us, ' Goya, inexorable towards his model, worked in absolute silence with extraordinary concentration and vigour.' The same writer relates, as an example of his nervousness and irritability in his studio, the story that the Duke of Wellington so exasper ated Goya while he was painting his portrait by passing comments upon his work while the picture was in progress, that he took a sword from the wall and forced his noble sitter to beat a retreat from his studio. Other authorities state that it was with a pair of pistols that he put the English Duke to flight. After all, the weapon is not a material point in the story. GOYA 63 A man who worked at this pressure might be expected to develop a tendency to scamp his work, but while many of Goya's compositions are mere sketches, they are all finished according to his theory that 'a picture is finished when its effect is true.' The many compositions Goya executed for the Countess of Benavente, until recently at the Alameda Palace, comprised the most representative exhibition of Goya's genius. The collection included many pictures painted with exceptional delicacy. The most important of these pictures, the Romeria de San Isidro, is a wonderful canvas containing a mass of details which astonish by their clearness and finish. The ' Coach attacked by Brigands ' is one example among many of his skill in catching an instantaneous motion and transfixing it upon the canvas. Among the Alameda paintings are some repetitions of the designs for the tapestry factory. The exuberant gaiety in these pictures is in amazing contrast with the ' San Bernard ' or the terrifying cartoon of 'Saturn devouring his Children.' /Goya can be simple and bizarre, idyllic and grotesque, fascinating and appall ing — his vitality emphasises every facet of his imagination. The examples of phases of his many-sided vision are inexhaustible. ' He makes 64 GOYA demons terrible by their humanity, and men and women horrible by their diabolical sinisterism. He paints you a f£te or a funeral, a picnic or a hanging, with the same facility and artistic assurance ; be the mood he would portray gay or gloomy, the scene brilliant or shuddersome, the beauty that of a child, a blushing maiden or a dazzling Maja, he never hesitates; nor does he often come short of success. In his portraits he is a realist — versatile, vivid, often unflinching in his brutality, unsurpassed, when he wills it, in perfection of treatment and intention. His finish is the fulfilment of his purpose, which has nothing in common with finish in the sense of elaboration. True, many of his likenesses are ' washed in with a certain impatience, almost as if the painter had tired of his subject ' (C. Gasquoine Hartley, in A Record of Spanish Painting); true again, the restlessness of his temperament made him inclined to seize on a characteristic rendering of pose and feature : but his portraits reflect the idea in his mind ; they express the always very definite something he has to say; the effect is true and the picture is finished. It was his method to arrange his canvas, his model and all his accessories, and then remain wrapped in profound reflection. When GOYA 65 his study of his model was ended he set to work, either to materialise his inspiration in a swift realisation of a personality, or to produce a suave, lingering piece of workmanship which recalls the refinement of Gainsborough in its elaborate, exquisite detail. Goya, by virtue of his portraits, has been rightly acclaimed the legitimate descendant of Velazquez, and, like the great Court painter of a previous century, he is a magnificent excep tion. But the comparison between the two masters cannot be pushed too far. Velazquez was a realist to whom the world appeared as a beautiful vision ; Goya was a realist to whom life was always a drama and not in frequently a satiric melodrama played in the tempo of a farce. Velazquez depicted men and women at their noblest ; Goya, when he was in the mood, detected the worst that was in them and he exposed it with a flourish. The grandeur of the times which we discern in the portraits of Velazquez is the grandeur of the artist's conception and treatment. / The eques trian effigies of Philip III. and Philip IV. reveal the magnificence and nobility of conscious king ship which neither of the monarchs possessed ; the royal likenesses convey to us a prosperity E 66 GOYA which impoverished Spain did not enjoy under the rule of his kingly sitters. Thus it is curious to find that some critics, but particularly the Conde de la Viflaza, should see in Goya's work a similar determination to idealise and glorify the charac ters of his royal patrons. ' The celebrated canvas of the family of Charles TV.,' writes Goya's latest Spanish biographer, ' together with the equestrian portraits' — the composition of which, as Mr. Rothenstein reminds us, he may well have learned from Velazquez — 'of Maria Luisa and* her husband, of Ferdinand vii. and Godoy, show forth a grandeur of mind and intellec tual and moral qualities which these people did not possess. The Godoy represented by Goya as though he were a sort of Marquis de Pescara, although he never wore his uniform except at sham fights, recalls the fact that Velazquez also, flattering the ridiculous vanity of the Count-Duke of Olivarez, painted his portrait in a suit which was not his own. Goya painted moral life hyperbolically idealised in his effigies of the kings, because he was painter to the Household and protected by the Crown and the Court, although he was rather the protector of his protectors. In all the other portraits of statesmen, politicians, literati, GOYA - 67 scientific men, actors, bull-fighters, priests and artists, Goya harmonised exactly the body and the mind. How marvellously he caught the faces of the men of great minds! How beautifully the moral and intellectual qualities of the person represented are shown ! ' A second and more cautious reading of the foregoing passage was required to convince us that it was written without sarcasm, and was meant to express a sober estimate of the qualities which the writer discovered in the pictures referred to. Personal taste, as we have remarked elsewhere, counts for much in the whole field of art, and in the opinion which is quoted the Conde de la Viflaza has the field practically to himself. Nearly all Goya's critics and admirers are united in their appreci ation of the merciless and remorseless frank ness, the pitiless satire, the mocking, saturnine faithfulness of the likenesses. Sir William Stirling-Maxwell misses the point of the eques trian portrait of Charles IV. when he remarks that ' the poor imbecile king, in the blue uniform and cocked hat of a colonel of the guards, mounted on a sober brown charger,' is 'an example of the dignity which may be conferred, by a skilful hand, on the most ordinary features 68 GOYA and expression, without sacrificing the resem blance.' But who beside Viflaza and Stirling- Maxwell could detect anything but a burlesque of kingly dignity in this grandly-uniformed, coarsely-made and coarse-faced Bourbon who sits 'asthmatic and fat, upon his fat asthmatic horse, with his fat asthmatic dog' — a study which moves a German critic to remark, ' How like a Moloch he appears, an evil god who has battened upon the life-blood of his people.' The portraits of his sensuous, passion-ridden queen are equally fearless, true even to brutality. Maria Luisa was a courtdsan seated upon the throne of Spain. Velazquez, it has been wisely said, redeemed the face of Mariana of Austria in his portrait by making her unapproachable icy pride the keynote in his composition. Goya extenuates nothing. He shows the queen, dicol- lete"e to vulgarity in her insolently vulgar gown, with gleaming arms and bosom exposed as a snare, which is watched over by the greedy, hawk like eyes. It is the woman she was, the 'woman who loved men better perhaps than she was loved by them,' the courtesan that the artist knew and flattered and despised. Of the picture of the ' Family of Charles iv.,' with its fourteen life-size figures, it has been written that it GOYA 69 ' mirrors the hidden merriment with which Goya recorded the Court history.' Here is a faithful exposition of Goya's estimate of the Spanish royal family ; an estimate which has never been so remorselessly expressed by any other de lineator of royal groups. They are depicted in their resplendent uniforms " and rich gowns, they have all the dignity that is derived from gorgeous trappings, but Goya has not spared them, or us, a tittle of their pitiful stupidity, their coarse insolence, their mental and moral degeneracy. ' The heads are admirably painted, as Gautier admitted, ' and are full of life, delicacy and intelligence ' ; but the French critic's general verdict upon the group represented is his best tribute to the genius of the painter ; — ' a grocer's family who have won the big lottery prize.' The more closely one studies these royal portraits the more one becomes convinced of their truth. To-day they remain' as real to us as the sympathetic, Velazquezesque likenesses of the painter Bayeu in the Prado, or of Dr. Peral in the National Gallery. It is almost impossible for any one to be in a position to award the palm for supreme excellence among Goya's portraits, for besides being so numerous, they are widely distributed among the aristocratic families of 70 GOYA Spain, and many are practically inaccessible to the student. There are fewer than two dozen of his portraits in the Prado, only two in the National Gallery, and one in the Louvre. Few people are familiar with more than a certain number of his portraits. For this reason there are many different opinions as to the compara tive merit of his pictures, but the individual opinions all constitute a remarkable tribute to the painter's genius in catching the likeness and reflecting the character of his subjects. Of the portrait of Villanueva, Seflor Caveda writes that ' it not only faithfully represents the features of the famous architect and the ex pression of him as a whole, but reveals in him the goodness of soul that animates him, and the noble simplicity of character which is so skilfully transmitted in all Goya's impressions.' Seflor Mariano Nonqu6s, referring to the portrait of Moratin, now in the possession of Don F. Silvela, declares that 'it may rightly be said without any appearance of exaggeration that this effigy is painted with the mind and with a spontaneity which is clearly seen, since there is nothing in it that reveals difficulty in the work, or any preconceived idea of imitating any other painter in its execution,' and he adds that, GOYA 71 by reason of the individuality it discloses, it should be considered one of the best likenesses painted by Goya. According to the painter Carlos Luis de Ribera, the genius of ' La Tirana ' may be seen in the head of the portrait of the distinguished actress, Rosario Fernandez. ' In it, as in all his (Goya's) works,' says this authority, * there is that air of truth which so few painters have attained ; there is brilliancy and freshness without pretension or exaggeration, the model is simple and convenient, and while it makes no show of strength it is not weak. Its execution springs as much from sentiment as that of all his canvases, because it was never sought after by Goya, but was the consequence and result of his spontaneity and intuition.' Again, of his portrait of Jose" Luis Munarriz, the eminent critic, Don Francisco Maria Tubina, writes : ' There is something on the canvas in addition to per fection in the technique, the beautiful develop ment of the subject and the exact likeness ; the immaterial part must be recognised and appre ciated — the inner vigour Goya gives the character, which illumines the features with the glow ofthe soul. Munarriz is represented to us in the picture as the fancy imagines him, as we see him in his biography, ingenious and lively in thought, dis- 72 GOYA tinguished in form, kind and firm in tempera ment, prudent in judgment, and with a mind always directed upon things which elevate and ennoble. Munarriz the literary man,' he says in conclusion, ' is the Munarriz of the picture, the one being explained by the other.' And read, also, what the Boletin de la Sociedad Espafiola de Excursiones contains concerning the two portraits of Dona Antonia de Zarate, now in the possession of Senora Vinda de Albacete : ' But where Goya shows the most exquisite sensibility and profound psychology is in these two portraits of one person, in which he incorporates the whole story of a dreamer swayed in life and death by the highest ideals, a woman of a race of poets and artists, Antonia de Zarate. Though in the first portrait he represented her smiling and in perfect health, in the second he knew her existence was under mined by a treacherous disease which was to cause her death. Never have we felt more deeply the impression of pathos than before this presentment of a soul rather than a person, before this face enveloped in transparent veils, with life showing in the eyes, and in that life a melancholy realisation of approaching death.' Goya's portraits, as we have said, are so numer ous that it is only possible to deal here with a GOYA 73 brief selection of them. In his large and varied gallery he displays so much versatility that it appears impossible that they could all have been conceived by the same mind and painted by the same hand. His treatment is alternately rough to the verge of violence and as smooth as the work of a miniaturist ; his tones are crude and heavy or luminous and glowing, as the sitter appeals to his mind ; he makes his queen a con fessed harlot and his little grandson the incar nation of dainty boyhood. The portrait of his wife, now in the Prado, is a work of the highest excellence, so are the beautiful representations of the Duchess of Alba, the vivid impression of Asensi, the delicious portrait of the Marquesa de Pontejos, the Gainsboroughesque study of the Conde de Florida Blanca, the equestrian painting of General Palafox, the dashing, almost contemptuously vivid likeness of Godoy, the striking portrait of Guillemardet so enthusiastic ally eulogised by M. Leon Legrange (Gazette des Beaux-Arts), and those of the Duke of Osuna, of Felix Col6n, Jove-Llanos and Ventura Rodriguez, of Martincho and Romero, the bull-fighters, of Pignatelly, General Urrutia, of the royal children, and of himself, painted when still young- -each portrait bears the stamp of Goya's genius, 74 GOYA each expresses an individuality in his individual style, each is finished because its effect is true.;' Goya's portrait of the Duke of San Carlos, the most loyal friend of the son of Maria Luisa, has won the admiration of many painters and critics. The head is beautifully painted, the posing is natural and graceful, the figure lives and breathes. For this ' miracle of art,' as Viflaza styles it, Goya used only a few colours, which he spread over the canvas with an energetic and grandiose brush, each stroke being the expression of an aesthetic thought and the perfection of the technique of painting. The portrait, 'which legitimises Goya's descent from Velazquez,' is said to be like the work of Rembrandt in its clare-obscure, of Watteau in its correctness, and of Titian in its delicacy and freshness. But there is no end to the expressions of admiration which Goya has inspired. Eduardo Rosales went to Zaragoza annually to visit Goya's portrait of the Duke of San Carlos, and on one occasion, when he had been lifted by a friend that he might study the face of the portrait, he is reported to have exclaimed, 'My friend, such painting will never be seen again.' In 1798 Goya was intrusted with the decora tion of the newly built church of San Antonio GOYA 75 de la Florida, which had sprung into existence in 1720 as a primitive hermitage, had been destroyed when the El Pardo road was made in 1768, was re-erected two years later, and in 1792 was replaced by the present elegant edifice, which was built at the expense of the royal patrimony, after the plans of the celebrated architect, Ventura Rodriguez. The outside of the building is of good architectural style, the interior is small and elegant, and well suited to the rank and fashion which frequented it. The Church was opened for worship on July 1, 1799, and we read that ' Madrid went wild with excitement at the glory of Goya's achievement.' Don Juan de Dios de la Rada y Delgado, who supplied the text for the volume of aquafortis engravings of these frescoes which D. Jose" Moria Galvan y Candela executed in 1897, tells us that they were wholly in accord with the conditions of the time. But the sentiment of Mr. Rothen stein is nearer to the truth when, in speaking of these frescoes, he says that he can remember nothing which gave him so clear an idea of Goya's cynicism. 'Imagine,' he writes, * a coquettish little church with a white and gold interior, more like a boudoir than a shrine, but furnished with altar, and seats, and confessionals. 76 GOYA One's nostrils expect an odour oifrangipane rather than incense, and it must be admitted that Goya's frescoes do not strike a discordant note in this indecorously holy place.' The subject of the main composition covers the cupola, and contains upwards of a hundred figures considerably over life-size. The picture illustrates the miracle ascribed to St. Anthony of Padua, who restored to life the corpse of a murdered man in order that he might reveal the name of his assassin and rescue an innocent man who was about to be executed as the perpetrator of the crime. The scene is enclosed by a painted railing which surrounds the entire composition. We see the saint standing on an eminence against a luminous background. His life-giving words have just restored the corpse to consciousness. The man leans forward, supported in the arms of a companion, with his hands clasped in an attitude of profound veneration, his expressive face looking fixedly upon the saint with a gaze of surprise and gratitude. The central figures are surrounded by a motley crowd of men, women, and children, some of whom express their astonishment by eloquent gestures, while others appear indifferent to the miracle that is being performed, and one or two frolicsome GOYA 77 boys are seen astride the figured railing. On the spandrils, the intrados, the curvilineal tri angles of the arches, and behind the high altar, are groups of angels and cherubs. The angels are beautifully clothed and almost wanton in their human loveliness, the babes are entirely without the illusion of divine origin. It has been said that in this composition Goya per fectly interpreted the spirit of the Church de la Florida ; certain it is that these angels with ' the skin of a camellia, eyes of fire, and the beauty of a harlot,' which move with audacious free dom of attitude, ' not in pure spheres of blessed ness, but in an atmosphere of atoms of gold illuminated by an Asiatic sun, are the strangest and most beautiful creatures that ever adorned a consecrated house.' ' The frescoes of la Florida,' comments C. Gas quoine Hartley, ' are yet another witness of the truthful humour of Goya's insight, but not one of his countrymen realised the irreverent irony of his work.' ' The figures are as full of piquant intention,' declared Richard Muther, ' as can be found in the most erotic paintings of Fragonard. ... It is an artistic can-can ; it is Casanova transferred to colour. All that the Church paint ing ofthe past had created is despised, forsaken; 78 GOYA and this satire upon the Church and all its works was written in the land of Zurbaran, of Murillo.' The Conde de la Viflaza alludes to Goya as an artist who painted pictures with religious subjects, but not religious pictures. ' I do not know,' he says, ' a more profane master than this Velazquez, Rembrandt, Vicelli and Veronese rolled into one.' And he instances his monumental paint ing at la Florida to illustrate his contention : ' An admirable energy, the most splendid scale of tones. What relief! What a magic of colour ! What a beautiful lesson the light of nature re ceives there ! On the other hand, what lack of religious feeling and spirituality in those frescoes ! ' And having denounced in the angels the silkiness of their skins, the brilliance of their eyes, and the wantonness of their beauty, he adds, ' the miracles of the exemplary man of Padua are familiarly treated as a spectacle of wandering rope-dancers might be ! ' It has been said that the King was incensed against the artist for introducing renowned ladies of his court in the faces of the winged arch angels, and it is generally believed that the most aristocratic persons of the capital are represented in the frescoes, but if Charles IV. resented his choice of models, he had a most GOYA 79 amiable way of expressing his displeasure. Goya himself, writing to Zapater, admitted that ' the King and Queen are mad on your friend Goya,' but the madness took the form of a royal order, dated October 31, 1799, which reads: ' H.M. wishing to reward your distinguished merit and to give in person a testimony that may serve as a stimulus to all professors, of how much he appreciates your talent and knowledge of the noble art of painting, has been pleased to appoint you his chief painter of the Chamber, at a yearly salary of 50,000 reals, which you will receive from this date free of rights, and also 500 ducats a year for a carriage : and it is also his pleasure that you occupy the house now inhabited by Don Mariano Maella should he die first,' etc. Certainly the frescoes in his own day were extolled as the most important work ever done by Goya's marvellous brush; he closed the eighteenth century with creations that won for him his greatest contemporary fame and raised him to the summit of his art. If nothing could be further removed from religious inspiration, nothing human could reveal more enchanting beauty, more exquisite grace. These frescoes were praised as ' an inimitable symphony of light and colour.' It is not in our province either to 80 GOYA accept or to refute the claim that 'they raise the most common things of Goya's time to the high spheres of Spanish mystic realism.' Goya's contemporaries did not realise that the paintings outraged the canons of propriety and probability, and in later times Seflor Rada finds that the painter, in this work, rises always to the regions of mystery, where only genius can pene trate, and responds to the peculiar influence of a temple which seems rather to inspire loving human aspirations, than mystic- thoughts of infinite abstraction. 'Apart from the fact that Goya was a believer and respectful to all that pertained to religion,' urges Seflor Rada, ' in the principal subject of this painting (the " Cupola ") he is as manifestly mystic and delicate as any painter of the spiritual school. In the central group the risen man partakes of both realism and religious unction. The expression could not be better, nor could the attitude of the saint be more dignified. Apart from this in the other groups, he copied what he was wont to observe in popular gatherings, as he saw it, as it was, as it always will be.' Goya's Spanish apologists may well be justi fied in their contention that his originality forced him to disregard the classic rules and GOYA • 8 1 mannerism of traditional Spanish religious art. They see no impropriety or extravagance in surrounding the figure of a revered saint with a crowd of roysterers, prostitutes, cut-purses and Manzanares rascals. And, after all, the point is scarcely worth arguing. Again, when it is pro tested that Goya's archangels and seraphim were rather beautiful women than angelic spirits — well ! what better conception could there be of angels than the perfections of a charming woman? That is Seflor Rada's retort: 'The naturalist Goya, surrounded by the seductive beauty of his time, could not conceive or even presume that the chosen beings who sing eternal praises in the ethereal regions of celestial glory were any different. More in accord doubtless, with our pious traditions and with Christian spiritual belief are the glories of Juan de Juanes and Murillo ; but each artist has his peculiar temperament as well as his special gamut of colour, and to ask Goya to paint angels like those gre-at Christian artists would be the same as asking the painters of a previous epoch to paint pictures of popular scenes like Goya's.' The logic of the foregoing is presumably sound, although the conclusion seems to us to support those who contend that Goya's temperament F 82 • GOYA rendered him an unsuitable person to translate religious episodes into colour. We remember, as Seflors Rada and Pedro de Madrazo assert, that Goya was 'a believer' and 'respectful in everything pertaining to religion,' and we recall also that in their joint will the painter and his wife describe themselves as 'firmly believ ing and confessing the mystery of the Holy Trinity . . . and all other mysteries and sacra ments, believed and confessed by our Holy Roman Catholic Apostolic Mother Church, in whose true faith and belief we have lived.' But we cannot, at the same time, forget that Goya's detestation of the priesthood was violent and unresting. If he caught the spirit of ecstasy in his picture of San Jose" de Calasanz receiving the Host at the hands of a priest, he also painted a representa tion of Santas Justa and Rufina. This picture has been described as the most profane and in appropriate work of the Aragonese genius. It is stated that he selected as his models a pair of well-known cocottes of Madrid, giving, it is said, the caustic, uncanonical explanation, ' I will cause the faithful to worship vice ! ' Goya may have called himself an orthodox conformer to the national church, but his contempt for his ecclesiastical patrons and those who practised the GOYA 83 devotions which he mechanically professed, is avowed. But apart from their religious significance, or their lack of it, these frescoes of the Church of San Antonio de la Florida reveal Goya at his best as a daring draughtsman and fine colourist. The energy, the spontaneity, the light and the relief, the magic of his paint — all are revealed in this work, which occupied him only three months. And what better proof could one desire of the truth of his own contention :.' In nature colour . exists no more than line — there is only light and shade.' Goya knew how to produce abundant life with simply white lead, the black of smoke, green and vermillion. Richness of colour does not consist in an infinite variety of tints, but in the harmonious variety of tones and in the skil ful selection of the key in which the picture is painted. Here Goya surpassed himself in the effect he produced with a palette that was severe in its simplicity, but the processes employed by the master to obtain his wonder fully vivid and charming tones were so varied that they cannot be exactly determined./ Of the result, Paul Lafond writes, it is 'as true as Velazquez, as energetic and as light as Rembrandt, as delicate as Titian, as spiritual as Tiepolo, with 84 GOYA infinite perspectives like those of Tiepolo and Veronese, and as refined as Watteau.' The painting of the frescoes of San Antonio de la Florida won for Goya, as we have seen, the coveted office of first painter to the Court. It was at this same time he began to paint less and to take up the needle as a new force of expres sion. His first work was the series of designs known as ' Los Caprichos ' in which the spectator is transported into some ' unheard of, impossible, but still real world' — a world peopled with dapper majas, handsome hidalgos, hideous old men and hags more horrible than the witch of Endor, gluttonous priests, spectres and sorceresses, devils and desperadoes and 'corpses, all the myriad diabolical and terrifying shapes and phantasies in which Goya set down his vision of humanity. The origin, the inspiration and the object of these etchings are still matters of speculation. It is generally agreed that the painter executed the first drafts for these plates after his return from San Lucar. His deafness ¦ aggravated by a serious illness, from which he made a slow and painful recovery, obliged him to give up the fatiguing work with palette and brush, and it may well be that he, whose spirit never rested and whose hand was never idle, GOYA 85 fell into a habit of preserving his impressions on paper in order to distract his tormented imagina tion from brooding over his sufferings. It was at a later date that he transferred these drawings on to the copper plates. It may be reasonable to assume, as some have done, that the part of philosopher which he had developed leisurely during his days at Court, as well as the vein of moralist and castigator of vice, was quickened in him by satiety and physical pain. The Conde de la Viflaza appears to believe that Goya suddenly awakened to his power as a carica turist, and that, irritated at the moral ugliness of his contemporaries, and at the vile coterie which surrounded the- King and Queen, he began to inveigh unflinchingly against lasciviousness, covetousness, rapacity, hypocrisy, and ignorance, against the court parasite and the court harlot, the miser and the monk, the women who sold their daughters and the monsters who bought them, against insolent pomp, ecclesiastical rot tenness and venal stupidity. Yet probably the view of Gautier is nearer the truth. He assumes that the now popular painter was ' merely pro ducing so many capricious sketches, when he was in truth drawing the portrait and writing the history of Spain of former days, under the belief ' 86 GOYA that he was serving the ideas and creed of modern times. His caricatures will soon be looked upon in the light of historical monu ments.' Extraordinary as these pictures are by reason of their fancy, their beauty, their saturnine wit, their 'Gargantuan spirit,' as well as by the technical skill and originality they display, they are even more extraordinary by reason of the favour with which they were at first received by the people against whom they were directed. At first the plates were issued separately and were passed from hand to hand among the etcher's friends. But in 1799, probably the year in which the series was completed, a prospectus was issued, advertising the publication of an edition of seventy-. two plates. Goya, for unknown reasons, objected to this edition, and the issue was never made. In the meantime the satire of these tumultuous cartoons was discovered by the objects of his ridicule. Godoy, the old Duchess of Benavente, the Queen's favourites, were the first to be identified, then effigies of the Queen herself and her illustrious lord were recognised upon the plates. The scandal of these allusions aroused an outburst of indignation, instigated, in great measure, by the caricatured and crucified" clergy. GOYA 87 The office of the Inquisition was moved to take action, and Goya's popularity and influence were powerless to avert the inevitable catastrophe. Rescue came from the most unexpected quarter. In 1803 the King caused an edition of 240 copies of 80 plates, which had already been printed, as well as the plates themselves, to be acquired by the state, with an order that he had commanded their publication. It is difficult to account for this splendid action from such a King as Charles IV. Was he so impressed by the merits of these etchings that he was prompted to rescue them from the Inquisition in the interests of art — a magnanimity of spirit ' of which his character gives no promise ' ? Probably he was merely insensible to the satire of the pictures. The ' Caprichos ' were dedicated to the monarch by the artist — a subtle jest on the stupidity of the King, who, Muther concludes, ' was not even in a position to grasp the meaning of the plates.' We learn that Charles remunerated Goya by granting his son a pension of 1 2,000 reals. A reproduction of the letter from the painter referring to this arrangement is as follows : — 88 GOYA £z, O&rf^u, <)&&. 0&vt~ <£'•?***} Co, - ynano, Ci*s JU& ^^A-^^i^c <*?«*_> /% CiZcoprcifi^. Off*. &J fcvrtifn* Qf£vy -*»**y <****<*****¦&* Jr. &*.J><*i GOYA 89 &.a^ TS>*41* Ca*r*vts -»*t"*_. ^M-tf/4-^ -__[.^«»'A«y»iAt Jki. G***^*^, „^ *r~*r«r, f^^U, ATE 1. \ LOS PROVERBIOS (THE PROVERBS)\ A collection of eighteen plates, now the property i. the Academia de San ^Fernando, Madrid. 1. Six Women tossing a dead Donkey and some Puppets in a Blanket. 2. Soldiers flying from a Tree draped to represent a Ghost. 3. Ten Persons seated on a rotten Branch over an Abyss listening to an Orator. 4. A gigantic Peasant dances, with Castanets, before Mannikins. 5. A Man riding on a winged Monster carries off a Woman. 6. A Man, seemingly in a Condition of Fury, throws down an old Man, who begs for Mercy. 7 . A Man and Woman j oined together at the Shoulders. A Crowd kneels before the Man. 8. Persons apparently preparing to run a Sack-Race. 9. A fantastic Personage offers some Kittens to two Women. 10. A Woman dragged along by a Horse. In the Background an Animal about to devour a Woman. 11. A two-headed Woman pursued by two Persons, who give up the chase. 12. Majos and Majas dancing. 13. Men, with wings attached, attempting to fly, 14. Two fantastic Persons exchange Salutations; an odd Crowd of Spectators. 15-. Monk preaching, while a Soldier throws himself into an Abyss. 0 1924 GOYA CATALOGUE 6. Angry Woman quarrelling with a three-armed Man. ^17. Persons deriding a blind Man, who is defended by a Dog. 18. An old Man attended by Monsters approaches a Corpse. * The following plates do not properly belong to the series : — 19. A Crowd watching some Trees tricked out as Ghosts. Belongs to M. E. Lucas. 20. A young Woman rides a Horse on a Trapeze. 2 J. Moors offering an open Book and a Collar to an Elephant. The property of M. E. Lucas. Published in 1877 under the title of ' Otros leyes por el pueblo' (Other laws for the people). Printed by T. and A. Constable, Printers to His Majesty at the Edinburgh University 1 THE FAMILY OF CHARLES IV. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 2. THE INFANTE DON CARLOS. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE THE INFANTE FRANCISCO DE PAULA ANTONIO. (Pkado, Madrid.) PLATE 4. THE INFANTA MARIA JOSEFA. (Pkado, Madrid.) PLATE 5. THE INFANTE DON ANTONIO, BROTHER OF CHARLES IV. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 'fl. THE INFANTE DON CARLOS MARIA ISIDRO. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE ' KING CHARLES IV. (MiNisTEKin de Hacienda, Madrid.) PLATE S. KING CHARLES IV. (Ministerio de Hacjenda, Madrid.) PLATE 9. KING CHARLES IV. PLATE 10. KING CHARLES IV. (Ruval Palace, Madrid.) KING CHARLES IV. (Prado, Madrid..) PLATE 12. KING CHARLES IV. (Marqles de Casa Torres, Madrid.) PLATE 13. " ' : ' ''¦' r*3&**0 ^51 .1 '.:* r-©^ V ^fe5!.t;-.'.: '^_-ES_l,*v ¦ ______ fi_____r t t3S-3_v*. l '. #,. * say ; WSHr'jr-^ _____ • '" rf* *5 *. .. K_ itfil P^ _______Kv.^s QUEEN MARIA LUISA. (Don A. de Beruete, Madrid.) PLATE 14. QUEEN MARIA LUISA. (Don Josit L.azan.) PLATE 15. QUEEN MARIA LUISA. (Ministerio de Hacienda, Madrid.) PLATE 10. QUEEN MARIA LUISA. (Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid.) PLATE 17 JUEEN MARIA LUISA. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE IS. QUEEN MARIA LUISA. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 19. FERDINAND VII. (Acadk.iv of St. Ferdinand, Madrid.) PLATE 20. FERDINAND VII. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 21. ferdinand vii. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 22. FERDINAND VII. (Ancient Collection of Eustaquio Veate.) PLATE DON LUIS, PRINCE OF PARMA. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 24. THE DUCHESS OF ABRANTES. (Duquesa de Abrantes, Madrid.) PLATE 23 THE DUCHESS OF ALBA. (Don Rafael Barrio.) PLATE 26. THE DUCHESS OF ALBA. (Palacio de Liria, Madrid.) PLATE 27. THE DUCHESS OF ALBA. (The Duke of Alba, Madrid.) PLATE 28. THE DUCHESS OF ALBA. PLATE 29. THE CONDESA DE ALTAMIRA AND DAUGHTER. (Makques de Cervera.) PLATE PLATE 31. THE INFANTE DON LUIS DE BORBON. (MaRi.h'f.^ de1 Casa Torres. Madrid. 1 PLATE 32. ALTAMIRANO AUDITOR OF SEVILLE. (Marques de la Vega Inclan.) PI. .VI K 33. DON MANUEL LAPENA MARQUES DE BONDAD REAL. (Don Jovqlin Akgamanilla.) PLATE 34. THE MARQUESA DE CABALLERO. (Marques he Chi. \ ek \.) PLATE 35. CONDE DF r.ABU»n< PLA'I V. 36. THE WIFE OF CEAN BERMUDEZ. (M \K'H kv DE C'\s. TOURES, M \I1RII_.) J. CEAN BERMUDEZ. (M -u.-nri-;^ ])i; Curvkka, Madkii>.) DONA LORENZO CORREA. (M. Pii^ciioi-KsiiKiM, Pakis.) PLATE 39. THE TOREADOR COSTILLARES. ( I ti i\ Josi-: Lazai.o.) DON JOAQUIN MARIA FERRER. (Count of Caxdili.a.) TLATE 11. CONDESA-DUQUESA DE BENAVENTE Y OSUNA. (Madrid.) IT.ATE J2. DONA MANUELA DE ALVAREZ COINAS. (Makqlis of Paroja.) PLATE 43. FLORIDA BLANCA. (.MAUQ. I --\ DE MAR lol.EI.L.) DON ANTONIO FORASTER. (Don J. Millan.) PLATE « THE ENGINEER IGNACIO GARCINI. (The Gakcim Family, Madrid.) PLATE 4it DONA JOSEFA CASTI LLA-PORTUGAL. {U..\ VlUiNft GMK.INI.) PLATE 47. DON JUAN ANTONIO CUERVO. tl>. )•'. In KAN.I DONA MARIA ILDEFONSO DABALOS. (Cul'NT UK YlLLAGi'N/ALO.) IT.ATI''. 4H. GENERAL DON JUAN MARTIN, SURNAMED EL EMPECINADO. (Don Luis Navas.) d GODOY, PRINCE OF THE PEACE. CACADKMV (TV St. KkKDIN'ANI), MadKII) ) PLATE CI. F. GUILLEMARDET, AMBASSADOR OF THE REPUBLIC TO SPAIN, 1798. (Louvre, Paris.) PLATE 52. JASPAR MELCHOR DE JOVELLANOS. (Marquesa he Yu'lamajok, Madrid.) ASENSIO JULIA (' EL PESCADOR ET '). (Ci im i i-.ssi. ue Pakis.) THE MILKMAID OF BORDEAUX. (Condesa Vinda di; Muguiro.) THE PAINTER ASENSIO JULIA C' EL PESCADORET'). (Louvre.) PLATE THE MARQUESA DE LAZAN. (Cmmtesse de Moniijo.) DON FRANCISCO L A R R U M B E. (The Ijank of Spain, Mai. kid.) THE FAMOUS BOOKSELLER OF THE CALLE DE CARRETAS. (D<>\ Bkmto Gahriga.) DON J. ANTONIO LLORENTE, HISTORIAN OF THE INQUISITION. (])n\ Francisco Llorente v Garcia de Vinuesa.) PLATE 00. THE DUKE OF SAN CARLOS. (Makhli.- de la Torrecilla.) PLA'J'E 111. THE DUKE OF SAN CARLOS. (Conde de Villagonzalo.) IT.ATE 02. THE ACTOR ISIDORO MAIQUEZ. (Prado, M un.iu. ) PLATE THE ACTOR ISIDORO MAIQUEZ: REPETITION OF THE FOREGOING. (Maki.h rs de Cas. Ti.KRES, Madrid.) THE COUNTESS OF MIRANDA DEL CASTANAR. (Furmhrly in Montijo Collection.) THE CONDE DE MIRANDA. LEANDRO FERNANDEZ DE MORATIN. (Academy of St. Ferdinand, Madrid.) PLATE 67 THE FAMILY OF THE COUNTESS OF MONTIJO. (Palacio de Liria, Madrid.) IT.ATE r.s. SENOR J. B. DE MUGUIRO. (G>".dksa Vinda in-: Mlt.uiru.) THE MARQUES DE CASTRO TERRENO. THE MARQUESA DE CASTRO TERRENO. PLATE VI. CAMARON. (Dona E. Camaron.) MUNARRIZ. (Academy of St. Ferdinand, Madrid.) PLATE 7:: THE DUKE OF OSUNA, WITH HIS FAMILY. (Pkado, Madrid.) PLATE 74. ADMIRAL MAZAREDO. (Don M. Hernando.) PLATE 75. MELENDEZ VALDES. (Senor SuArez Inclan.) THE DUKE OF OSUNA (FoKMEKl.V IN THE COLLECTION W THE l'HKE OF OSUNA.) PLATE 1 ¦ii-.1 ¦ '/me* '¦'. j * <&? ft*! A ¦ _____________ ***• ________ \ ^flfe L- V-____k 1 -.fflk'^i ^V-___^H BBT THE DUKE OF OSUNA. |7 MAKi,)!. I VA DE YlI.LAMAJOR, M\I)-RII'.) PLATE 78. THE DUKE OF OSUNA. (M. Duviat, Paris.) PLATE 7H. THE DUKE OF OSUNA. (Formerly i\r the Palace uf the Dure of Osuna, Madrid.) PLATE sn. DUCHESS DEL PARQUE. (M\KO_UE« de i.a Vega, Madrid.) PLATE si. DOCTOR PEYRAL. (Natio vjal Gai.i.ekv, LllNII'lN.) PLATE 82 GENERAL PALAFOX. (Prado. Madkid.) PLATE si DONA ISABEL CORBO DE PORCEL. (X \ I If i\ \l, I'.AI.I.IkV, LOMIUX.) PLATE s-1. DON TIBURCIO PEREZ. (D. F. Duran and Cuervo.) PLATE 85. DON MARIANO LUIS DE URQUIJO. (Academy lie Himui.y, Maukim.) PLATE Sli. DON TOMAS PEREZ ESTALA. (Coi.viESs of Cedillo.) PLATE S7 DON PANTALEON PEREZ DE NENIN. (Don P. Labat.) M.A I E SS. THE MARQUESA DE PONTEJOS. (Marquesa de Martorell.) PLATE N'i don ramon pignatelli (Duquesa de Villahermosa.) PLATE 90. GENERAL RICARDOS. (Madrid.) PLATE 91. THE TOREADOR JOSE ROMERO. (Madrid.) PLATE- MARQUES DE SAN ADRIA'N. (In the Collection of the Family.) PLATE 93. THE MATADOR PEDRO ROMERO. (Dure of Yri.aou \.) IT.ATE 94. RAMON SATUE, IN 1823 (ALCAIDE DE CORTE). (Dr. Beniih Garrioa.) PLATE 93. DON MANUEL SILVELA. (Don F. Silvela.) PLATE K-. DONA MARIA TERESA APODACA DE SESMA. (Don Anders Arteta.) PLATE MARQUESA DE LA SOLANA. (Marques del Shcokku.1 S £ 7, PLATE GENERAL URRUTIA. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 99. MARIA DEL ROSARIO FERNANDEZ, SURNAMED 'LA TIRANA,' A CELEBRATED ACTRESS. (Academy ui- St. Ferdinand, Madrid.) PLATE 100. THE ACTRESS MARIA DEL ROSARIO FERNANDEZ. SURNAMED LA TIRANA.' (Conde di- ViiijciwtmaI plate: nil. THE MARQUES DE TOLOSA. (Hank ok Srain, Madrid.) PLATE 102. THE CONDE DE TEBA. (Don J. Lazaro.) PLATE 103. JOSE DE VARGAS PONCE. (Academy of History, Madrid.) IT.ATE 104. DON JOSE DE TORO ZAMBRANO. (Bank of Stain, Madrid.) DONA ANTONIA ZARATE. (,S..-;m.ka Vinda i>k At u-ai_F"(k_) (¦axaOYiny aa vn..i( vao.N-aq. ¦axvavz vinoxnv vnoo '•'HI ilXVTd -T.ATE 107. DONA LOLA ZIMENEZ. (M. Chiramv, Paris.) PLATE 10S. DON EVARISTO PEREZ DE CASTRO, PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL OF CASTILE. 1 l.or\ re. Paris.) PLATE 109. DON JUAN JOSE. MATEO ARIAS DAIRLA. (M\RQl'hs. DE ALMAOUER.) PL4TE 110. FATHER LASCANAL. (Don J. LAzaro. ) PLATE 111. DON RAMON DE POSADA Y SOTO. (Don Jose Maria Perez Caballero.) P1ATE 112 MARQUESA DE CABALLERO. (Marques de Corvera, Madrid.) PI ATE 113. THE CONDE DE GAZINZA. (Makques de Casa Torres, Madrid.. IT.ATE 114. MORATIN. (Don F. Silvela ) PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST, BY HIMSELF. (ACAIJI-.MY UK Sl\ I' * klJJNAXU, Madkid.) PLATE 110. PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST, BY HIMSELF. ID. A. Pidal.) PLATE 117 PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST, BY HIMSELF. PLATE US. PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST, BY HIMSELF. (M. Leon Bonnet.) PLATE 119. GOYA AT THE AGE OF 80, BY VINCENTE LOPEZ. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 120. DON J. B. DE GOICOECHEA. (Don Felipe Modet.) PLATE 121. GOYA'S GRANDSON. (-Maki.iues de Alcanices.) IT.ATE 122. DONA FELICIANA BAYEU. 11). C. Ferriz.) PLATE 123. DON JUAN MARTIN DE GOICOECHEA. (Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid.) PLATE 124. DONA NARCISA BARANONA DE GOICOECHEA. (Don Erlite Modet.) PLATE 12 DONA JUANA GALARZA DE GOICOECHEA. (Marques de Casa Tokkks, Miiikid . PLATE 126. THE PAINTER, FRANCISCO BAYEU, BROTHER-IN-LAW OF GOYA. (Prado. Madrid.) PLATE 127. JOSEFA BAYEU, GOYAS WIFE. (Prado, Madrid.) PIATK 12s. GROUP' OF HEADS. (Formerly in the P\i u k (If-Sav. Tm.mo, now ix tuf C'OLLI-'C I'll iv OK Till C'llMM-ssK DE PAU1S.) 2 > PORTRAIT STUDY OF A WOMAN. PLATE 130. PORTRAIT OF A YOUNG GIRL. (Private Proter iv.) ¦aovh v do xivaxaod 'Tilt .IXV'l.l PL A I E 132. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. IC0NI1I-- OP PlNAIAIZ.) PLATE 133. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. (Don Jose I, (/arm.) PLATE 134. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. (Don A. de Beruete.) PLATE 1S5. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. (Don A. de Bekuete.) PLAI I-. 136. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. (Don A. de Hekieie.) PLATE 137 PORTRAIT OF A LADY. (Don K.. Garcia.) jjL,AJ_'Ji j;^ PORTRAIT OF A WOMAN. (Luuvke, Paris.) PLATE 139. A LITTLE GIRL. (Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid.) PORTRAIT OF A LADY. (,D<_>n J. GuTiKKUt/. Martin.) PLATE 111 YOUNG SPANISH WOMAN. (Louvre, Paris ) PLATE 142. PORTRAIT OF A MAN. (Private Collection.) PLATE 143. THE OLD MAN. (CoNUE UK D \. MARINA.) PT, VTE 144. PORTRAIT OF AN ARCHITECT. PL VIE li:. PORTRAIT OF A DOCTOR. PLATE 140. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. IT.ATE 1 17. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. PLATE US. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. ¦aov-1 v do xivaxaod PLATE l'.u. PORTRAIT OF A MAN. PLATE 151. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. (Senor Orossen.) PI. VI E PORTRAIT OF A LADY, PORTRAIT OF A GENTLEMAN. PLATE 154. CHARLES IV. (Comtesse de Paris.) IT .A I E 155. QUEEN MARIA LUISA. (O i\tti-ssi- he Paris.") T. VI E 150. THE INFANTA ISABEL, AFTERWARDS QUEEN OF THE TWO SICILIES, AT THE AGE OF 12 YEARS. (Comtesse di Paris.) "L \TE l;.r. PORTRAIT OF A MAN. PLATE 158. DON FELIX COLON, SPANISH AUTHOR. (Don Ricardo Traumann, Madrid.) PL VIE 189. (FRAGMENT) DON FELIX COLON, SPANISH AUTHOR. (Don Ricardo Traumann, Madrid.) PLATE 160. PORTRAIT OF A MAN. PLATE 161. PORTRAIT OF A BOY. PLATE 162. PORTRAIT OF A BOY. PLATE 163. PORTRAIT OF A BOY. TLATE 164. - ; ¦ , N ?;&Pr ' a. ¦ . ',. Spr-.' PORTRAIT OF A LADY. PLATE 165. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. PLATE 166. PORTRAIT OF A LADY. PLATE 167. ¦**%fc "-":: ¦-.-. PORTRAIT OF A YOUNG LADY. (Mons. C. G., Paris.) EPISODE OF THE FRENCH INVASION OF 1808. THE STRUGGLE IN THE PUERTA DEL SOL BETWEEN THE CITIZENS AND THE CAVALRY OF THE IMPERIAL GUARD. (Prado, Madrid . > ON MURAT'S CAVALRY BY THE PEOPLE OF MADRID MAY 2ND, 1808 (SKETCHX (Duqufsv de Villahermosa.) CASTING BULLETS BY MOONLIGHT IN THE HILLS OF TARDIENTA. (Royal Palace, Madrid.) t-1> H SCENES OF THE 2ND MAY 1808: A GROUP OF CITIZENS OF MADRID BEING SHOT BY THE TROOPS OF MURAT. (Prado, Madrid.) BATTLE-SCENE. (Marques de Casa Torres, Madrid.) MANUFACTURING POWDER IN THE SIERRA DE TARDIENTA. (Royal Palace, Madkid.) THE TRIBUNAL OF THE INQUISITION. (Prado, Madrid.) THE PROCESSION OF FLAGELLANTS. (Academy of St. Ferdinand, Madrid.) r>HIS -r > HM A MEETING OF THE COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES PRESIDED OVER BY FERDINAND VII. PLATE 177. THE CITY OF MADRID: AN ALLEGORY. (The Corporation of Madrid.) PLATE 178. PLATE 179. SPAIN MAKING HISTORY. (Don Luis Navas.) >1-3 THE MADHOUSE. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 181. THE MAJAS OF THE BALCONY. (COLLHCTION OF THE DuQUE DE MaRCHKSA.) PLATE 182. the majas of the balcony. (Repetition of the Foregoing, with Variations.) the knife-grinder. (Budapest.) LA MAJA (CLOTHED). (Prado, Madrid.) C>w PLATE 187. THE WATER-CARRIER. (Budapest.) PLATE 188. OLD AGE (Lille Museum.) PLATE 18_!_ ROBBERY OF A COACH. (Marques de Castro Serna.) PLATE 190. BRIGANDS. (Marques de la Romana.) PL VTE 191. BRIGAND MURDERING A WOMAN. (Marques de la Romana.) PLATE 192. BRIGANDS STRIPPING THEIR CAPTIVES. (Marques df. i.a Romana.) MURDER BY BRIGANDS. (Marques de la Romana, Madrid.) r >Hm BRIGANDS' CAVE (Marques de la Romana, Madrid.) PLATE 1(1.1. GOYA AND THE DUCHESS OF ALBA. (Marijues de la Rom\na ) THE PLAGUE TERROR. (Marques de la Romana.) PLATE 197. THE MONK'S VISIT. (Marques de la Romana.) > -ir, A MASQUERADE. (Duquesa. de Villahermosa, Madrid.) PLATE 199. z H PLATE 200. THE FUNERAL OF THE SARDINE : CARNIVAL SCENE. (Academy of St. Ferdinand, Madrid.) PLATE 201. THE BOOTH AT THE FAIR. (Marques de Castro Serna.) THE GREASY POLE. (Marques de Castro Torres.) PLATE 203. PLATE 204. NOCTURNAL SCENE. (Marques de la Romana.) PLATE 205. PLATE 206. THE INUNDATION. (Marques de Castro Serna.) PLATE 207 THE VILLAGE ON FIRE. (Marques de Castro Serna.) PLATE 208. CAPRICE. (Dona C. Berganza de Martin.) PLATE 200. CAPRICE. (Dona C. Berganza de Martin.) PLATE 210. o p. >-, DOGS AND GUNS: DESIGN FOR TAPESTRY. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 212. __ 2 PLATE 213. l'LATE 211. A PICADOR ON HORSEBACK. (Prado, Madrid.) PICADOR AND BULL. (Marouks de Baroja, Madrid.) l'LATE 210. DEATH OF THE PICADOR. (Paris.) A BULL-FIGHT. (r.EuUKA IHKI) TO THE ROYAL ACADEMY.) A BULL ESCAPED FROM THE ARENA. (Duque de Veragua.) MEETING OF WITCHES. (Prado, Madrid.) r H GALICIAN SHEPHERDS FIGHTING. (Prado, Madrid ) THE PROCESSION. (Conde di-: C-vnwi.u.) PLATE 222. PLATE 223. PLATE 221. i__________i-^^w'*^_a_^ ___r^ iw^^aB W '* ¦¦• ^¦kHv ; ___W__Rj-_, "flh - . J ¦r Br%_9 Jr -^2e*-JN 1 _____B__L ¦f' -^ PP1^ Jl r 1 fl .jam ¦EM* ' ____M___tf ' \MBr ' 'V J^H *¦ HH_S^Sffinra_l SATURN DEVOURING ONE OF HIS CHILDREN. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 225. ¦ Bii^Hir^i^s ''l/rfov*'' ¦ ' J^' ' • ,^|IL-;--^K^ ¦ ' ¦ ¦ 'a— ^ .'-»' * Ik, _4wil______tec^i '"''''" _i^^__bI mtr z^^***'*' 1 M* * ' jiff K. ' _____ JUDITH AND HOLOFERNES. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 220. TWO MONKS. PLATE THE MAJA. (Erom Goya's Countrv House, near Madrid.. PLATE 228. PLATE 2211. LISTENING TO THE NEWS. (Prado, Madrid.) A GROUP OF WITCHES. (Prado, Madrid.) >l-J A GROUP OF WITCHES. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 230. t-> A GROUP OF WITCHES, (Prado, Madrid.) THE BULL-FIGHT. PILGRIMAGE TO THE FOUNTAIN OF SAN ISIDRO. (Prado, Madrid.) t-* MEETING OF WITCHES. (Prado, Madrid.) TWO OLD PEOPLE EATING PORRIDGE. IPicado, Madrid.) r THE MASS OF PARIDA. (Marques de la Torrecilla.) PLATE 237 THE TOPERS. WOMEN OF MADRID, AND FRIARS. (Marques de Casa Torres.) PLATE 230. PLATE 240. THE WITCH. PLATE 241. LAUGHING WOMEN. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 242. THE SWING. (Duke de Montellano.) PLATE 243. THE GREASY POLE. (Duke de Montellano.) PLATE 244. THE ACCIDENT. (Duke de Montellano.) PLATE 240 COACH ATTACKED BY BANDITS. (Duke de Montellano.) BUILDING THE CHURCH. (From the Collection of the Dlque de Osvna.) PLATE 247. THE VILLAGE PROCESSION. (From the Collection of the Duque de Osuna.) SUMMER: THRESHERS OF WHEAT. (Don Ricardo Traumann.) PLATE 249. THE HERMITAGE OF SAN ISIDRO. (Don P. F. DurAn.) PLATE 250. THE WOUNDED MASON. (Don P. F. Duran.) THE HERMITAGE OF SAN ISIDRO. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 252. SCENE FROM THE PLAY 'EL hTEOHIZADO POR FUERZA' BEWITCHED BY FORCE. (National Gallery, London.) PLATE 253. THE PICNIC. (National Oallerv, London.) HERD OF BULLS COMING FROM THE MUNOZA. (From the Collection of the Dunui-: de Osuna.) PLATE 250 A CAPRICE. (From the Collection of the Duque de Osuna.) PLATE 256. A WITCHES' CONVENTICLE. (From the Collection of the Duque de Osuna.) PLATE 25 SORCERY SCENE. (From the Collection of the Duque de Osu.\a.i PLATE 258. DON JUAN AND THE COMENDADOR. (From the Collection of the Duque de Osuna.) PLATE 259 irsm __¦ DON QUIXOTE. PLAI'E 200. ST. BERNARD OF SIENA. (Church or S.\n Fkanciso> el Grande.) PLATE 261. ST. BERNARD OF SIENA. (Marques de Torrecilla.) PLATE 262. CHRIST TAKEN BY THE SOLDIERS. PLATE 263. CHRIST ON THE CROSS. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 204. THE DEATH OF ST. JOSEPH. (Don A. Bekuete. Madrid ) PLATE 265. THE HOLY FAMILY. (Prado, Madrid.) PI-ATE 266. ST. JUSTA AND ST. RUFINA. (Seville Cathedral.) PLATE 267. APPARITION OF ST. ISIDORE TO KING FERDINAND III. (Don A. Canovas, Madrid.) PLATE 26S. ST. PETER. (Dun A. Phial, Madrid.) THE 'PRAYER IN THE GARDEN OF GETHSEMANE. (The Rector of San Antonio.) PLATE 270. ST. ELIZABETH OF HUNGARY HEALING LEPERS. (D. Clemente Velasco.) PLATE 271. ST. HERMENEGILD IN PRISON. (D. Clemente Velasco.) ANGELS AND CHERUBIM. (CllMlE DE Vll.I.AI.ciNZALU.) > 3 FRESCO OF THE CUPOLA OF SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA, 1ST SECTION. FRESCO OF THE CUPOLA OF SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. 2ND SECTION. PLATE 275. 5ESCO OF THE CUPOLA OF SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. 4TH SECTION. PLATE 27 _T :-~ •• ».•-• i GROUP OF ANGELS FROM SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. >H FRESCO OF SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. r> LUNOH ON THE BANKS OF THE MANZANARES: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) r DANCE AT SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA- TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Maiikih.) THE SCUFFLE AT THE VENTA NUEVA; TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madkid.) PLATE 2S'J. al fresco scene: tapestry cartoon. (Prado, Madrid.) THE DRINKER: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) THE PARASOL. TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Puado, Madkid.) r > -. THE KITE: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Pkado, Madkid. I PLATE 2S0. IHE CARD-PLAYERS: TAPESTRY CARTOON (Prado, Madrid.) CHILDREN WITH A BLADDER: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 2S8. BOYS PICKING FRUIT: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) BLIND MAN PLAYING THE GUITAR: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 290. THE FAIR OF MADRID: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 291. THE CROCKERY SELLER: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 292. THE SOLDIER AND THE GIRL. TAPESTRY CARTOONS. (Prado, Madrid.) LA ACEROLERA. PLATE 293. PLAYING AT SOLDIERS: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) 13 -_ THE GAME OF PELOTA: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 295. THE WASHERWOMEN: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 296. LA NOVILLADA: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 297. THE TOBACCO GUARD: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE CHILDREN CLIMBING A TREE. THE HUNTER AND HIS DOGS. TAPESTRY CARTOONS. (Prado, Madrid.) THE CHILD AND THE BIRD. PLATE THE WOODCUTTERS: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) 13 THE RENDEZVOUS: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE SOI ____________________ THE GARDENER: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 302. THE VINTAGERS: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 303. POOR WOMAN AT THE FOUNTAIN: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE. 304. WINTER: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid ) THE WEDDING: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 306. WOMEN AT THE FOUNTAIN: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) ' THE SWING: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) > H THE STILT-WALKERS: TAPESTRY CARTOON (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE BOYS CLIMBING A TREE: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Prado, Madrid.) PLATE 310. BOY ON A SHEEP: TAPESTRY CARTOON. (Don Gaeino Stuyk, Madrid.) PLATE 311. CAPRICES 1 FRANCISCO GOYA Y LUCIENTES, PAINTER. 2. EL SI PRONUNCIAN. PLATE 313. PLATE 314. 4. EL DE LA ROLLONA. 3. HERE COMES THE BOGEY I PLATE 31 j. PLATE 316. 5. BIRDS OF A FEATHER. 6. APPEARANCES ARE DECEPTIVE. PLATE 317. PLATE SIS. 7. NOT THUS CAN HE DISTINGUISH HER. 8. KIDNAPPEDI PLATE 319. PLATE 320. 10. LOVE AND DEATH. 9. TANTALUS. 11. ANDALUSIAN BRIGANDS. 12. TOOTH-HUNTING. PLATE 323. PLATE 324. 14. WHAT A SACRIFICEI 13. THEY ARE HOTI PLATE 325. PLATE 326. 15. GOOD COUNSEL. 16 'MAY GOD PARDON HERI PLATE S27. PLATE 328. 17. BIEN TIRADA ESTA. . .«. .-..«-.. - ..- „_.J*_3«s»'S_»B!_ 18. 'AND HIS HOUSE IS BURNING!' PLATE 329. PLATE 330. 19. 'ALL WILL FALL. 20. THEY ARE ALREADY PLUCKED. PLATE 331. PLATE 21. HOW THEY PLUCK HER! 22. POOR LITTLE THINGS! PLATE PLATE 334, 23. THIS DUST. 24. THERE WAS NO REMEDY. PLATE 335. PLATE 3311. 26. NOW THEY HAVE A SEAT. 25. BECAUSE HE BROKE THE PITCHER. PLATE 337. PLATE 27. WHICH IS THE MORE BORED? 28. HUSH! PLATE PLATE 340. 29. THIS IS WHAT HE CALLS READING 30. WHY HIDE THEM? PLATE 341. PLATE 342. 31. SHE PRAYS FOR HER. 32. WHY WAS SHE SENSITIVE P PLATE 343. PLATE 344. 33. 'TO THE COUNT PALATINE.' 34. SLEEP CONQUERS THEM. PLATE 34il. 35. THEY SHAVE HIM. A BAD NIGHT. PLATE 347. PLATE 348. 38. BRAVISSIMOl 37. WILL THE PUPIL KNOW MORE THAN THE MASTER? PLATE 349. PLATE 350. 39. AS FAR AS HIS GRANDFATHER. 40. OF WHAT ILL WILL HE DIE? PLATE 351. PLATE 352. 41. NEITHER MORE NOR LESS. 42. THOU WHO CANST NOT. PLATE 353. PLATE 354. 43. THE SLEEP OF REASON PRODUCES MONSTERS. 44. THEY SPIN LINEN. PLATE 355. PLATE 350. 46. CORRECTION. 45. THERE IS A LOT TO TASTE. PLATE 357. PLATE 358. 47. HOMAGE TO THE MASTER. 48. THE BLOWERS. l'LATE 300. 49. LITTLE GHOSTS. 50. LAS CHINCHILLAS. PLATE 361. PLATE 362. 51. THEY CUT EACH OTHERS' NAILS. 52 WHAT A TAILOR CAN DO. PLATE PLATE 364. ^ 53. 'WHAT A MOUTH OF GOLD! 54. THE SHAMEFUL ONE. PLATE 365. PLATE 300. 56. TILL DEATH 56. ASCENDING AND DESCENDING. PLATE 367. PLATE 57. THE DESCENT. __._ - ' YV~ 58. SWALLOW THAT, YOU DOG I H< H% ^f^^^W^rm fa- i ¦ ' & . ' I fa ^Wi/ w- - 62. WHO WOULD BELIEVE ITP 61. VOLAVERUNT. PLATE 373. PLATE 374. 63. HOW GRAVE THEY ARE. 64. BON VOYAGE. PLATE 375. PLATE 376. 65. WHERE IS MAMMA GOING? 66. BEWARE I PLATE 378. 67. WAIT TILL YOU HAVE BEEN ANOINTED. 68. PRETTY MISTRESS PLATE 379. PLATE 380. s___n 70. DEVOUT PROFESSIONS. 69. SOPLAI PLATE 381. PLATE r /. // ////'///'//¦ ?.' , >?_rv /'6 72. YOU WILL NOT ESCAPE. 71. THE DAY BREAKS, LET US GO. PLATE 383. PLATE 3S4. (. Wt'/W ''¦> '//"///'" : 73. IT IS BETTER TO DO NOTHING. 74. DON'T GRIZZLE, IDIOT. PLATE 385. PLATE 380 t! - LVL# V , %T»«j<5&>^' 75. THE HABIT OF COMMAND. 76. WILL NO ONE SET US FREE? PLATE 387. PLATE 3S8. 77. A MIMIC BULL-FIGHT. 78. BE QUICK, THEY WAKEN. PLATE PLATE 390. .-..-: 79. NO ONE HAS SEEN US. 80. IS IT ALREADY THE HOUR P . vVAR PLATE 391. 1. SAD PRESENTIMENTS. PLATE 392. 2. WITH OR WITHOUT REASON. PLATE ALL THE SAME, PLATE 394. 4. WOMEN INSPIRE COURAGE. PLATE 395. 5. AND ARE LIKE WILD BEASTS. PLATE 6. A GOOD THING, TOO I PLATE 397. PLATE 398: 7. COURAGE] 8. WHAT ALWAYS HAPPENS. PLATE 399 9. THEY WILL NOT! PLATE 400. 10. NOR THEY! PLATE 401. 11. NOT FOR THESE1 PLATE 402. 12. WERE YOU BORN FOR THIS? PLATE 403. 13. A BITTER SIGHT. PLATE 404. 14. HARD IS THE WAY. PLATE 405. 15. AND THERE WAS NO REMEDY. PLATE 406. 16. THEY AVAIL THEMSELVES PLATE 407. 17. THEY DO NOT ARGUE. PLATE 408. 18. TO BURY AND TO BE SILENT. PLATE 409. 19. THERE IS NOT TIME. PLATE 410. 20. TO HEAL EACH OTHER. 21. IT WILL BE THE SAME. PLATE 412. 22. AS MUCH AND MORE. PLATE 413. 23. THE SAME ELSEWHERE. PLATE 414. 24. THEY ARE STILL- OF USE. PLATE 415 7-„, ,,/,,'„ rWiS 25. AND THESE ALSO. PLATE 416. 26. THAT CANNOT BE SEEN. PLATE 417. 27. CHARITY. PLATE 418. 28. THE POPULACE. PLATE 419. 29. HE DESERVED IT. SO. THE TRARFnV np wad PLA1E 421. 31. STRONG MEASURES. PLATE 422 32. WHY P PLATE 423. 33. WHAT MORE IS THERE TO DO? PLATE 424. 34. FOR A KNIFE. PLATE 425. 35. NO ONE KNOWS WHY. PLATE 426. 36. NOR WHEREFORE. PLATE 427. 37. THIS IS WORSE. PLATE 428. 88. BARBARIANS I PLATE 429. 39. A GREAT FEAT WITH THE DEAD. PLATE 430. 40. HE TURNS IT TO ACCOUNT. PLATE 431. 41. THEY ESCAPE THROUGH THE FLAMES. PLATE 432. . ,/ ... ',;.__ '- ___. _'_v>^ ^f '....,* 42. ALL IS IN CONFUSION. PLATE 433. 43. HERE ALSO. PLATE 434. 44. 'I SAW IT I 45. AND THIS, LIKEWISE. PLATE 430. 46. THIS IS BAD. PLATE 437. 47. THUS IT HAPPENED. PLATE 4C8 48. CRUEL MISFORTUNE! PLATE 49. A WOMAN'S CHARITY. PLATE 440. 50. UNHAPPY MOTHER. PLATE 441. 51. THANKS TO THE BLUE VETCH. PLATE 442. 52. THEY ARRIVE TOO LATE. PLATE 443. 53. HE DIED WITHOUT HELP. PLATE 444. jYCXiyWW1^^ 64. VAIN CLAMOURS. PLATE 445. 55. TO BEG IS WORST OF ALL. PLATE 446. 56. TO THE CEMETERY. PLATE 417. 57. THE HALT AND THE SICK. PLATE 44S. 58. OF NO USE TO CRY. PLATE 449. 59. OF WHAT USE IS A CUP. PLATE 450. 60. NO ONE TO HELP. PLATE 451. 61. ARE THEY OF ANOTHER RACE! PLATE 452. 62. DEATH-BEDS. PLATE 453. 63. COLLECTED DEAD. PLATE 454. 64. CARTLOADS FOR THE CEMETERY. PLATE 455. 65. 'WHAT MEANS THIS TUMULTP' PLATE 456. 66. STRANGE DEVOTION. PLATE 457. 67. THIS IS NOT LESS SO. PLATE 45S. 68. WHAT MADNESSI PLATE 459. 69. NOTHING; HE SAYS IT HIMSELF PLATE 460. 70. THEY DO NOT KNOW THE WAY. PLATE 461. 71., AGAINST THE GENERAL GOOD. PLATE 462. 72. THE CONSEQUENCES. PLATE 463. 73. THE CATS PANTOMIME. PLATE 464. 74. THIS IS WORSE. PLATE 465. 75. A MEETING OF QUACKS. PLATE 466. 76. THE CARNIVOROUS VULTURE. PLATE 467. 77. MAY THE ROPE BREAK. PLATE 468. 78. HE DEFENDS HIMSELF WELL. PLATE 469. 79. TRUTH DIED. PLATE 470. WILL SHE REVIVEP TAUROMACHIE PLATE 471. 1. HUNTING BULLS ACROSS COUNTRY IN THE OLDEN TIME. PLATE 472 2. HUNTING THE BULL ON FOOT. PLATE 473. 3. MOORS HUNTING THE BULL ACROSS COUNTRY. PLATE 474. 4. MOORS FIGHTING THE BULL IN AN ENCLOSURE. PLATE 475. 5. THE MOOR, GAZUL, FIGHTING THE BULL. PLATE 476. 6. MOORS IRRITATING THE BULL. PLATE 477. 7. ORIGIN OF THE BANDERILLA. PLATE 478. 8. MOOR ATTACKED BY A BULL. PLATE 479. 9. SPANIARD, WEARING A TURBAN, SLAYING A BULL. PLATE 480. 10. CHARLES V. IN THE ARENA OF VALLADOLID. PLATE 481. 11. THE CID SPEARING A BULL. PLATE 482. 12. MEN ATTACKING THE BULL. PLATE 483. 13. HORSEMAN PLANTING BANDERILLAS IN THE BULL. PLATE 484. 14. THE PUPIL OF FALCES AND THE BULL. PLATE 485. 15. THE FAMOUS MARTINCHO PLANTING BANDERILLAS. PLATE- 486. 16. MARTINCHO'S FEAT. PLATE 487. 17. MOORS USING DONKEYS INSTEAD OF HORSES. PLATE 488. 18. MARTINCHO IN THE ARENA AT ZARAGOZA. PLATE 489. 19. MARTINCHO'S FEAT. PLATE 490. 20. JUANITO APINANI IN THE ARENA AT MADRID. PLATE 491. 21. SPECTATORS SLAIN BY THE BULL AT MADRID. PLATE 492. 22. THE WOMAN PICADOR, PAGUERELA, AT ZARAGOZA. PLATE 493.. 23. MARIANO CEBALLOS IN THE ARENA. PLATE 494. 24 CEBALLOS MOUNTED ON A BULL. PLATE 495. cws WW***' 25. BULL-BAITING. PLATE 26. PICADOR OVERTHROWN BY THE BULL. PLATE 497. 27. FERNANDO DEL TORO IN THE ARENA. PLATE 498. 28. READQN IN THE ARENA AT MADRID. PLATE 499. 29. PEPE-ILLO FACES THE BULL. PLATE 500. 30. PEDRO ROMERO IN THE ARENA. PLATE 501. 31. FLAMING BANDERILLAS. PLATE 502. 32. BULL OVERTHROWING PICADORS. PLATE 503. 33. DEATH OF PEPE-ILLO IN THE ARENA. PLATE 504. PICADORS MOUNTED ON MULES HARNESSED TO A CARRIAGE. PLATE 505. BULL CARRYING A WOUNDED TOREADOR ON HIS HORNS. PLATE 506. BULL CARRYING A DEAD TOREADOR ON HIS HORNS. PLATE 507. VARIATION OF NO. 25. PLATE 508. A SPANISH GENTLEMAN IN THE RING. PLATE 509. BRAVO TORO ! PLATE 510. NEARING THE END PROVERBS PLATE 511. 1. WOMEN TOSSING A DEAD DONKEY AND MANNIKINS IN A BLANKET. PLATE 512. 2. SOLDIERS FLYING FROM A TREE DRAPED TO PLATE 513. 3. PERSONS LISTENING TO AN ORATOR. PLATE 614. 4. PEASANT DANCING BEFORE A MAN AND WOMAN. PLATE 515. 5. MAN CARRYING OFF A WOMAN ON A WINGED MONSTER. PLATE 516. 6. THE INFURIATED MAN. PLATE 517. 7. MAN AND WOMAN JOINED TOGETHER AT THE SHOULDERS. PLATE 51S. 8. PERSONS DRESSED IN SACKS. PLATE 519. 9. FANTASTIC PERSONAGE OFFERING KITTENS TO TWO WOMEN. PLATE 520. 10. HUMAN BEINGS MALTREATED BY HORSES. PLATE 521. ¦ H yv-\ S2-2 Wk_ |4B| ^Tls^lSwhwr^^'i.. B_______>v3M_______£«&9 "-''""--- jX ______.- **s_fe-^ '"' 'ia^H l AmiWLWLf- . '¦- ^^^ "-- ^ :-'^^^ 11. A TWO-HEADED WOMAN PURSUED BY TWO MEN. PLATE 522. 12. MAJOS AND MAJAS DANCING. PLATE 523. 13. MEN ATTEMPTING TO FLY. PLATE 524. 14. FANTASTIC SALUTATIONS. PLATE 525, 15 PLATE 526, A MONK PREACHES; SOLDIER THROWS HIMSELF DOWN AN ABYSS. 16. MAN AND WOMAN QUARRELLING. PLATE 027. 17. PERSONS DERIDING A BLIND MAN. PLATE 528. 18. THE OLD MAN AND THE CORPSE. PLATE 529. It&tiik .1 THE PROMENADE. PLATE 530. •-¥4 23V A PAUPER. H|MHE90H^BHH9 PLATE 533. PLATE 534. A WOMAN FLYING. (Don A. de Beruete.) MADMEN. PLATE 535. PLATE 530. THE MAJA AND THE CLOAKED MAN. A MONK SUSPENDED IN THE AIR. (Don A. de Beruete.) PLATE 537. PLATE THE LIVING SKELETON. FRENCH CHASTISEMENT. (Don A. de Beruete.) PLATE 539. PLATE 540. v**Sfc AQUI ALGO HA DE HABER. THE SNAKE CHARMER. (Don A. de Peruf.te. ) 5 o i PLATE 543. PLATE 544. THE MADMAN. THE LADY WITH THE PUPPIES. (Don A. de Beruf.te.) PLATE 545. PLATE 546. PAUPERS. PROCESSION ENTERING THE TEMPLE (Don A. de Beruete.) PLATE 547. PLATE 54S, - — ~c£Z£ **__________ *^rJM Mr <4mp > 'sflgf s mM __J .%m ^^1 ™ ^ ¦¦! tii ,__3___i_- [__> %$$% I1 w R 1M ~. — i, i ' " - PJt|^S Still. i f___i----i_____i-__! pjjs*"" . n te; ' "i Kv >"C -'"•,' WOMEN PRAYING. POR MITAD DE CUARESMA. (Don A. de Beruete.) PLATE 549. PLATE 650. BRIDES OF THE CHURCH. (Don A. de Beruete.) MELODIOUS MEDIATORS. PLATE 551. IPef^ A SLEEPING MAJA. PLATE 552. THE SKATERS. (Don A. de Beruete.) PLATE 553. PLATE 554. STUDY FOR THE YOUNG INFANTE IN 'THE FAMILY OF KING CHARLES IV.' (Don A. STUDY FOR THE PORTRAIT OF THE QUEEN IN 'THE FAMILY OF KING CHARLES IV.' IK BEI-UI."r_.. . K_ SLEEPING GIANT. A GENTLE EPISODE. (Don A. de Beruete.) < a. H Hrf ..__*kJa,U. j $fe:S- « />',«^™.s -\yj( -~ ' -v>- w r^y^^rsBB' H3 SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. PAINTING IN THE PRINCIPAL CHAPEL. PLATE 583. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. PAINTINGS ON THE CENTRES OF THE INTRADOS OF THE CHOIR AND PRINCIPAI? CHAPEL ARCHES. PL -VTE .584. s SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. PAINTINGS ON THE SPRINGIN3S OF THE INTRADOS OF THE PRINCIPAL CHAPEL ARCHES. PLATE 5S0. PLATE 5S7. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. PAINTINGS ON THE SPRINGINGS OF THE INTRADOS OF THE CHOIR ARCHES. PLATE 588. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. PAINTINGS ON THE INTRADOS OF THE LEFT SIDE CHAPEL ARCH. PLATE 589. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. PAINTINGS ON THE INTRADOS OF THE RIGHT SIDE CHAPEL ARCH. PLATE 590. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. TRIANGLES FORMED BY THE DOME ADJOINING THE PRINCIPAL CHAPEL. PI ATE 591. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. TRIANGLES FORMED BY THE DOME ADJOINING THE CHOIR. PLATE 592. PLATE 593 SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. PAINTINGS AT THE SIDES OF THE WINDOW ON THE LEFT. PLATE 594. PLATE 595. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. PAINTINGS AT THE SIDES OF THE WINDOW ON THE , RIGHT. PLATE 596. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. FIRST GROUP ON THE CUPOLA TO THE LEFT OF THE CENTRE. PLATE 597. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. SECOND GROUP ON THE CUPOLA TO THE LEFT OF THE CENTRE. PLATE 598. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. CENTRE OF THE COMPOSITION ON THE CUPOLA FACING THE ENTRANCE. PLATE 599. ;/T-' SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. FIRST GROUP ON THE CUPOLA TO THE RIGHT OF THE CENTRE. PLATE 600. SAN ANTONIO DE LA FLORIDA. SECOND GROUP ON THE CUPOLA TO THE RIGHT OF THE CENTRE. PLATE 601. DUKE OF WELLINGTON, 1812. (From the Orhginal Drawing in the Print Room of the British Museum.) *g PLATE 602. LADY AND GENTLEMAN ON HORSEBACK, (From the Original Coloured Sketch in the Print Room of the British Museum.) PLATE 603. HEAD OF THE DYING FRAY JUAN FERNANEZ. (From the Original Drawing in the Print Room of the British Museum.) PLATE 604. i n* .-.V*/X_lt*'<,V - ' '5> «__>¦_-¦ - "*,»__ ~« "__* -* — — IllliiliP W^z A CRIMINAL UNDERGOING THE INFLICTION OF THE GAROTTE. (From the Original Drawing in the Print Room of the British Museum.) PLATE 605. 2g2 PLATE 006. CONDEMNED CRIMINALS CONDUCTED TO EXECUTION. (From the Original Drawing in the Print Room of the British Museum.) r H SPANISH PROVERB ILLUSTRATED. (From an Etching, hitherto unpublished, in the Print Room of the P.ritish Museum.) H SPANISH PROVERB ILLUSTRATED. (From an Etching, hitherto unpublished, in the Print Room of the British Museum.) r> H H SPANISH PROVERB ILLUSTRATED. (From an Etching, hitherto unpublished, in the Print Room of the British Museum.) HM TAUROMACHIA: THE BULLS. A STUDY OF THE ANIMALS IN VARIOUS POSITIONS. (From an Etching, hitherto unpublished, in the Print Room of the British Museum.) r- > H TAUROMACHIA: BULL-FIGHTER FETTERED IN THE ARENA. (From an Etching, hitherto unpublished, in the Print Room of the British Museum.) Xr>H t-1 TAUROMACHIA: A BLIND GUITAR-PLAYER TOSSED BY A BULL. (From an Etching in the Print Room of the British Museum.) YALE UNIVERSITY a39002 001548560b