YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ON COLOUE j*. 10ITDOS' PRIKTED BY SPOTTISWOODE AND CO, NEW-STREET SQUARE. ON C OL 0 U B AND ON THE NECESSITY EOB A GENEEAL DIFFUSION OF TASTE among ALL CLASSES. WITH REMARKS ON LAYING OUT DRESSED OR GEOMETRICAL GARDENS. EXAMPLES OE GOOD AND BAD TASTE ILLUSTBATED BY WOODCUTS AND COLOURED PLATES IN CONTRAST. SIR J. GARDNER WILKINSON D.CL. P.K.S. P.K.G.S. M.K.S.L. M.K.I.B.A. ETC. LONDON JOHN MTJERAT, ALBEMARLE STREET. 1858 PEEEACE. In writing the accompanying remarks on colour and the necessity of encouraging taste, I have been actuated by a desire to see England rival, and if possible excel, other countries in all the various branches of aesthetic art. I have ventured to point out what appear to me to be certain errors and misconceptions, into which we have fallen or are liable. to fall ; and I have endeavoured to show how important it is that all classes of the community should appreciate the beau tiful, and encourage the production of good works. Without this we may vainly hope that taste will take permanent root in the country, or that the studies now so laudably encou raged by some valuable institutions will produce any general and lasting benefit. If I appear to censure, it is only from a regret that errors should be repeated without correction ; and my remarks are not made with a view to find fault but to show why we have sometimes failed to produce a work deserving of praise, and to point out what should be avoided ; with the sincere wish that we may deserve the praise, instead of the censure, of those who now condemn us for deficiency of taste. There are some who, like the Italians, are privileged, by their own superiority in this respect, to condemn us for A 3 VI PREFACE. our deficiency ; and the French are far more successful than ourselves in decorative design ; but we may refuse to others the same privilege, and though the Germans have made considerable advances in various branches of art, we cannot concede to them the superiority they assume ; and in point of colour their example* would be rather injurious than beneficial to decorative taste. I do not however intend by this to detract from the great merit they deserve of having laboured assiduously to study and advance art in its highest, as well as in its inferior, branches.; this I acknowledge with great respect ; and I gladly admit the credit due to them for having called attention to the works of the early masters of Italy, which had ceased to be regarded with proper interest until brought by them into general notice. I have been par ticular in censuring the common error of introducing great quantities of green into coloured ornamentation; and have shown that though green may sometimes be allowable in large masses, and when of a glaucous hue may be used as a ground for other colours, its employment in large proportions in combination with them is incompatible with their harmonious ' arrangement. It abounds when people become artificial. But in those periods when taste in colour was pure, the primaries were always preferred ; and in confirmation of these remarks I may observe that the old custom is also observable! in heraldry, where the early coats have the primary colours (with gold and" silver), and where green is a sign of no great age. The same change from the natural and pure taste of man at an early period (when it was unbiassed by conven- * They appear also to differ very much from their early masters in the appreciation and use of rich colours, PREFACE. VII tional or theoretic notions) is shown in the recent coloured designs of the North American Indians ; who for the old simple patterns, and the use of primary colours, have substi tuted an imitation of real flowers and the abundant introduc tion of green, in order to suit the artificial requirements of European purchasers. I could have wished that the coloured specimens I had made of the various combinations mentioned in Sections XVI. and XVII. of Part I. could have been introduced, as well as of those mentioned in Sections XVIII. and XIX., and of the coloured papers in Section XXI. ; but this has been found impossible from their number, and the expense of printing so many colours, hues, and tones. Any one however may easily make experiments on the particular 'effect produced by them, from the names of the colours I have indicated. I have had much pleasure in offering my meed of praise to our institutions for the instruction of students in deco rative art; and the efforts now making for the general diffusion of taste cannot be too highly commended. Ex cellent opportunities are also given, by the exhibition of the drawings of competitors in architectural, monumental, and other designs, of showing the talent of the designers, and of accustoming the public to the habit of forming some opinion on the merits of each ; and these exhibitions give a far fairer estimate of the talents of the candidates than the usual " competitive examinations " in various branches of learning ; which, useful as they are, often lead to a questionable con clusion respecting the real talent and sound knowledge of a successful competitor. If I have sometimes repeated the same remarks I offer this A 4 'VUl PREFACE. excuse, that it was from a desire of calling attention to par ticular points which appeared to me of the greatest import ance ; and as my object is to suggest what I believe to be of use, I hope to be pardoned whenever I have expressed an opinion differing from the conclusions, or the practice, of others. I can respect them while I differ from them ; and as my wish is to direct inquiry towards certain questions most worthy of consideration, I shall be happy if others will point out any erroneous judgment I may have formed on the subject ; and I therefore conclude with the well-known words of the poet — " Si quid novisti rectius istis, Candidus imperii; si non, his utere mecum." ERRATA AND ADDENDA. Page 18, six lines from the bottom of the page, after the word "admis sible,'' add , " and where copies of natural objects should seldom be introduced." Page 80, line 19, on the words " three purples," add this note : — * " The purple of Tyre was extracted from the Murex and the Buccinum ; but the Helix Ianthina (still so common on that coast), is the shell from which tbey probably first obtained it, as it proclaims the secret of its possessing the purple dye by the colour it throws out, like the Sepia, on being approached. This accords with the story of its accidental discovery by the dog of Hercules, which would not have been made from the Murex or the Buccinum ; arid if these gave a dye superior to that of the Helix Ianthina, their properties were found out by subsequent experiment, their colour not being at first purple. Indeed they only produced a good dye by being used together, and by a long process ; while that of the Helix Ianthina is at once a pure and true purple. (See my note, and the woodcut in Herodotus, book iii. ch. 20, n. 2, Tr. Rawlinson.) The Phoenicians imported purple fromHermione in Argolis, Cytherea, &c. ; and Ezekiel, xxvii. 7, says it came to Tyre ' from the Isles of Elishah ' (Hellas, or Greece) ; it has therefore been thought that this was different from the ori ginal purple of Phoenicia, which accords with the above statement." Page 242, line 5, on " Flaxman," add this note : — * " Like the Greeks, he felt the impropriety of displaying grief in sculpture ; and though the Greeks in writing used a stronger ex pression than our ' indulged in grief (as in the ' TeTapir ' of Homer, II. i|/. 10), they abstained from representing the suffer ing countenance in sculpture and painting ; as we even see in a fresco representing the sacrifice of Iphigenia, given in Gell's Pompeii." Page 266, line 2, for " finished houses,'' read " furnished houses." Page 302, line 19, on " Homeric age," add this note : — * "Cf. H. t|/. 743, the Sidonian crater offered as a prize by Achilles, at the funeral games of Patroclus." I.S.W. 41 DESIGN SHOWIH&HOW GREEN MAY BE USED TO LIGHT TO OTHER COLOUR LoTidoiJohniriirGwAlbeimii' StrsstJ&y.l853 /fl»J Illllll I.GW. dd SEVEN COLOURS GIVEN TO BE ARRANGED ISA PATTERN landon, JolmMTUTdy, Albemarle Street, Hmr.1858. iniuiuinn a. 3d c defgh.iklm.il EFEECTS OE COLOURS. EIG.5. THE PRINCIPAL COLOURS USED, 6,7, 8,9,10, ARE DISCORDANT J G"W deL Landcot JolmMnrray,-AIbemarl£ Street Nov; 1558. DESCRIPTION OF PLATES AND WOODCUTS. PAET I. Plate I. is intended to show how blue, red (or scarlet), white, black, green, and gold may be combined in a mosaic pattern. The idea of its general configuration is taken from one of the borders which separate the fresco paintings in Giotto's Chapel, at Padua, and it has been varied to suit the arrangement of the colours. The quantity and disposition of the green will serve to show how small a "proportion of that colour is required, and how it brightens up a design. {See p. 63.) The gold too illustrates what I have said in pp. 107, 117, of its being employed in greater quantity than orange or yellow. As an instance of the black lines separating the chief sections of the design, mentioned in p. 108, see Blue, D 2, p. 135. Plate II. shows how the seven colours, orange, yellow, blue, purple, green, red (or scarlet), and black, given promiscuously in fig. 1, may be arranged in harmonious order, as in fig. 2. It is one of many different arrangements which may be made of those colours ; in some of which more or less red, or blue, or others, may be intro duced, according to the required effect. For though, as a general rule, the blue should be in greater quantity than red, it is possible to have perfectly harmonious combinations even where these pro portions are disregarded. There are cases, for instance, when more red may be used than blue ; and sometimes the red' may be con fined to a very minute quantity. In fig. 2, it will be observed how much better blue and orange are suited to each other than blue and yellow, which are rather harsh. Here too the power of a small quantity of green is very apparent. {See pp. 63, 146, 166.) The design is not very well suited to the arrangement of colours; but it may serve as an in stance of colour in a geometrical figure. Plate III. Fig*. 1 and 12 give different arrangements and quantities of the same colours, blue, orange, black, white, and green. They are both harmonious. {See Blue, C 9, p. 134.) xii DESCRIPTION 0^ PLATES AND WOODCUTS. Plate III. — (continued.) Fig. 2 is the Egyptian arrangement of blue, scarlet, and green, on a yellow ground, or separated by yellow fillets. (See p. 95, and Blue, B 2, p. 132.) Fig. 3 is one arrangement of the seven colours, purple, yellow, blue, scarlet, green, orange, and black, in simple succession. An other, and perhaps a better, arrangement would be black, blue, yellow, scarlet, purple, orange, and green ; or purple, orange, green, scarlet, blue, yellow, and black. (See Blue, E 1 a, p. 135.) In fig. 4 are the colours, but not the pattern, of the Jewish ephod. (See p. 17, 131 ; and Blue, B 7, p. 183.) In fig. 5 are specimens of the hues of the colours mentioned in this work, as near as they can be obtained in copies made partly by chromo -lithography, and partly by hand colouring: viz. a. blue,, b. red, c. scarlet, d. crimson, e. cerise, f. purple, g. yellow, h. orange,! i. green, h. tea-green, I. brown, m. horsechesnut, n. chesnut, ; o. black. Figs. 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, illustrate what I have said in pp. 92, 93,;? and are specimens of discordant combinations: -viz. fig. 6. scarlet, green, and russet (red would be still worse than scarlet) ; 7. blue, orange, and olive ; 8. yellow, purple, and citrine ; 9. purple and citrine ; and 10. green and russet. In fig. 11 is an instance of the mode of preventing blue and red (or scarlet) looking purple ; by the intervention of the white and orange. There are many methods of doing this. Here the com bination is blue, white, scarlet, orange, and purple, which is har monious ; though in this design the orange next the scarlet, does not afford a sufficient contrast. (See Blue, C 2, p. 134.) Figs. 13, 14, illustrate the difference of little red on a white ground, and little white on a red ground : showing the great su periority of the former. (See p. 149 ; description of Plate iv. fig. 4 ; and Blue, B 6, p. 133.) Plate IV. fig. 1, is an instance of the union of blue, red (or scarlet),. and yellow, the latter separating the other two to prevent their having a purple effect in combination. (See pp. 9, 94, 95 ; and Blue, A 1, p. 131.) Tnfig. 2 are the five colours, blue, scarlet, yellow, purple, and black (see Blue, C 5, p. 134.) The proportion of the purple and the black, to the yellow and to the other two colours, is by no means the one generally required; and it might be altered considerably in ?a different design. The arrangement is nevertheless quite har monious ; and it may serve as an instance of the great range allowed to the proportions of different colours, mentioned in pp. 147, 148.1 251. (See Blue, C 5,' p. 134.) PI. IV. COMBINATIONS OF COLOURS LonfliffTV-fcfr"'lfr'TTBy Al^mnarlp Street. Nov. U358. l.G.W. del EFFECT OF PATTEllMS WUKU EOT QUJTE REGULAR. (.anion.JoJra "Murray, Aj^cimu-ie Sireai. Nov.]858. DESCRIPTION OF PLATES AND WOODCUTS. xiii Plate IV. — (continued.) Fig. 3 shows how little green is required to brighten up a design, as I have already shown in the description" of Plate I. (See p. 63, and Blue, B 2, p. 132.) Fig. 4 is an instance of white on a red ground, generally so heavy (see p. 149, and description of Plate in. figs. 13, 14), which is made perfectly agreeable by the addition of blue and yellow in this design. (See Blue, B 6, p. 133.) Fig. 5 is another instance of the manner in which red and blue may be prevented from appearing purple by the intervention of yellow and white, and how blue should be separated from yellow in a pattern (as in a carpet) by a black line. (See the combination in Blue, C 7, p. 134.) Fig. 6 is given as an instance of the propriety of making the patterns rather irregular than exactly symmetrical and of equal size, particularly in a carpet. The advantage of this is more obvious in a large expanse, and the inaccuracies being there smaller in proportion than in the figure here given, they do not appear so evidently to the eye, though they have the desirable effect of preventing that monotony which fatigues it in an exactly symme trical design. A better instance of this is given in Plate v. Jig. 2. The colours are blue, scarlet, orange, black, white, yellow, and purple." (See Blue, E 8, p. 136.) Plate ~V.fig. 1 is a carpet border of blue, scarlet, green, yellow, black and white. (-See Blue, D 1, p. 135.) Though the combination is harmonious, the arrangement of the red next to the green is not such as would be generally recommended ; nor should yellow border the red ; but those defects are here remedied by the distribution and proportion of the other colours ; and the whole is well balanced and agreeable. Fig. 2 is intended to show how much more important is the effect of the colour in a carpet than that of the pattern, as I have observed in p. 20 ; and how much more agreeable is that irregularity in certain parts of the pattern met with in Eastern carpets, than the formal and symmetrical exactness thought so necessary in our own. As I have said in the description of Plate iv. Jig. 6, the irregularities are made more apparent in this small design than they would be in the large expanse of a carpet, where they would give the required variety without being actually apparent to the eye ; but * By mistake the yellows as well as the orange, have all been printed of the latter colour in the plate, instead of being alternately so. DESCRIPTION OF PLATES AND WOODCUTS. small as it may be, the effect of the central portion will serve to show how much better a varied pattern is suited to a carpet than one of more geometrical and formal construction. The proportion of the border to the central part is of course disregarded. It is intended for a centre of greater dimensions, where the same centre might be extended, or repeated, or subjected to various modifications. (Set Blue, E 2, p. 135.) PAET H. Page Woodcut 1. Mistaken application of the principle of " flowing lines " . . . ... .174 „ 2. Vases with badly proportioned foot . . .180 „ 3. Fig. 1. Vase of elongated proportion . . 180 Fig. 2. Idea of the base taken from the stone ring in which the pointed-based vase originally stood, as in fig. 3 . . . . . .181 „ 4. Designs of tables, inconsistent and unmeaning . 187 „ 5. Principle regulating the form of a Saracenic dome . 206 „ 6. Faulty mode of placing landscapes, or figures only, on the front of a vase .... 212 „ 7. Figures placed around a vase . . . .212 „ 7 a. Flowers, as the Greek honeysuckle, conventional . 217 „ 8. Cabinets of bad form ..... 219 „ 9. Maori wood carving, not unlike some of our mediaeval and later work ..... 220 „ 10. Mixture of glass, or porcelain^ with metal, mistaken . 221 „ 11. Ornaments on a false principle . . . 222 „ 12. Objects of good shape badly imitated . 223 „ 13. Chandelier made up of various objects . . 230 „ 14. A candlestick made of a vase ; a false principle . 230 „ 15. One utensil copied from an object of a different cha- racter • . . . . .230 „ 16. Other instances of the same . . . .231 „ 17. Canopied tombs, elegant in idea and form . . 242 „ 1 8. Vases, faulty in their proportion . . .243 „ 19. Greek women carrying hydrias, or water-jars, to the fountain. (From Mr. Birch's Pottery, as well as woodcuts 21, 22, 23, 37, 38) „ .249 DESCRIPTION OF PLATES AND WOODCUTS. XV Page Woodcuts 20 to 24. Greek Olla, and other vases (mostly Greek), of good form and proportion . . 250 to 254 Figs. 8, 9, of woodcut 24, show how different they may be, though both are of good form and proportion ; and how impossible it is to lay down rules for what must depend on the judgment of the eye. „ 25 to 33. Vases of bad taste, though many very costly 255 to 258 „ 34. Some spoilt by changes in the form and proportion . 258 „ 35. A vase appearing as if made up of the form of two different ones ..... 259 „ 36. Vase with handles suited to its size . . . 260 „ 37. Greek rhyton in the form of an animal's head . 260 „ 38. Greek askos, taken from a water skin . . 260 „ 39. The askos badly imitated at the present day . 260 „ 40. Fig. 1. Mistaken, and (Jig. 2) proper mode of placing figures on vases . . . .261 „ 41. Mistaken position of figures on a cylix . .261 „ 42. Mixture of geometrical patterns and flowers in a design, a false principle . . . .261 „ 43. The same form, as in a window divided into two parts by a vertical line, looks higher than when not so divided ...... 262 „ 44. Taulty mode of arranging ornaments in a vertical design ...... 263 „ 45. The volute capital of very early Egyptian date . 263 „ 46. Mixture of scrolls and flowers, a false principle . 264 „ 47. Mode of hanging pictures in a room . 265 „ 48. Egyptian early vases, very like those of Greek time, in form and details .... 300 „ 49. Some patterns, used in Greek and later times, of a very early Egyptian age .... 301 „ 50. Roman notched stone voussoirs copied by the Sa racens ...... 302 „ 51. Anglo-Saxon treatment of drapery, fig. 1 I, fig. 2 b, and figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, — an imperfect and ill understood imitation of the antique . . . .311 „ 52. Segmental arch abutting against a wall, as if it did not belong to it . . . . ¦ 333 „ 53. Arches approaching too near to the summit of the wall it pretends to support, and even breaking through and passing above it 334 „ 54. Mistakes in spires and obelisks . . . 339 xvi DESCRIPTION OF PLATES AND WOODCUTS. Page.; Woodcut 55. Obtuse points of spires . . .340 „ 56. Monstrous forms of some German spires . . 340 „ 57. Want of proportion between upper and lower arches 342 „ 58. Windows of bad form . . . .348 „ 59. Broken pediments ..... 348 „ 60. Bad taste of Stuart time imitated . . . 348 „ 61. Facades with the pediment broken up . . 349 „ 62. House with the ground sloping towards it ; and the mode of laying out a terrace and garden on the same ground when lowered and levelled . . 368 Plate VI. Fig. 1 a, b, c, d, e, balustrades of different patterns, most simple in their construction. Fig. 2. Patterns of box, with gravel walks between them. Plate VII. Fig. 1, a geometrical garden with terrace-walk above, within a stone balustrade, close to which is a border with mixed , flowers of various colours. The central part is some feet lower than the terrace-walk, from which two flights of stone steps lead to its walks. In its centre is a vase on a pedestal, or a small fountain. The walks are of gravel, and the beds are edged with box. The sloping sides, e e, are here laid out in a zigzag pattern ; but this may be varied by other patterns, more tasteful and elabo rate than the zigzag, or they may be planted with mixed flowers of various colours, provided they are low. At each corner is an Irish yew. Fig. 2 contains various patterns. The gardens need not be con fined to the space here given ; and this figure is rather intended to offer a variety of patterns, than the arrangement of a garden, which should have other patterns at the side, between it and the balustrade which . surrounds it, as on the left of Plate viji. at e. In the colour of these Plates, allowance must be made for the false effect caused by the quantity of yellow in the garden walks, which will not appear in the garden itself. Plate VIII. gives an arrangement of beds in a geometrical garden of moderate size, which may be extended according to the size of the garden. GEOMETRICAL GARDENS & FLOWER BEDS PI. VI. Tyl. y ys~ \j- i, ,i i^.Z yymyy wM^mm yy.y=^' >vu «^3W ®> roj Vi/ \m W&tiVVth.™ Puihsfod Iff Jolai,JlkrTmr,Jlbmuaie 0*1858 CEOMETRICAL GARDENS & FLOWER BEDS. Pi.vn. ^ A Feiwtcu/L.ar cu Vase oruPedestaZ-mfh. sttps I B. B JBardanvidwarioiis Flowers. .* j't) ZZ State. ba^astradeJc ifrram naving a vase, on eaxn,,jpdlar,wi&-a sunJc fence or fosse hdew. il, fe'Roand leds with, Jh$k-3far. D D AYase Gt> eack/ccrnor oftk&slejiuuj teals E E. F. F. Stonest^s leading el/wn. frvnutke termce walk to the Ictrer levels ~b ~b Vppy tomue walk. The centre, jiarb is Icwer ¦diaiv the upper terrace- waUo\\&\oibtkesteps FF Lead about WC feet Jy?.2. ¦H r- mH ! V€ Fountain- 8 p U \7jm 5W wm-j j rtus walk -wkuh maveuherbe, on a> father level &ax tAe Garden as m,F.lororvtk& jam* level arnearbfse =xp= — ' ep j 1 PiMsIlM «i fcfri /few! OhmiarlvStJSbS. CEOMETRICAL GARDENS & FLOWER BEDS n.vni. A Terrace ~be(wens the house- £ tha garden,. F F 5to/ieSaps. B FnzntazjL C. Stone balustrade or the tmrai'e watt. C C Slap&s of turf K H Sunk fence or fosse D Slope of tarf round tAe fomUai/o orjplarUed K.K Targe ~Yases onltedestals. wtfhstmjcrppJk other Ion- mqping plants, &c. feJBedswtffc cypress oriish^w. E ^..tirarel walks LIZ ewer gravel walks. FuhUsJietl by John, Mimy.JUxmarU ST 7S& ON COLOUR THE NECESSITY OE TASTE BEING GENERAL. PART I. ON COLOUE. § 1. It has been generally remarked by foreigners, and as generally admitted by ourselves, that the English are very indifferent to the effect of colour for decorative or ornamental purposes. We take little pleasure in studying the harmonious arrangement of colours, either in dress, furniture, or architec ture; and when the attempt is made to compose coloured designs we frequently tolerate and even admire discordant or anomalous combinations. Indeed, we sometimes maintain that bright colours not only fail to please, but are even dis agreeable ; and advocate the use of compound hues, neutral tints, greys, and other so-called "quiet colours," in prefer ence to any combinations of the primaries, red, blue, and yellow, and other colours of the prism. These we often jpro- nounce to be "gaudy." But bright colours are not neces sarily gaudy. It is when bright colours are put together without due regard to their suitableness to each other, their relative quantities, or the arrangement they require, that they appear gaudy and glaring. Gaudy colours we may, in ^ ON COLOUR. Part I. fact, define to be the union of bright hues without har mony ; and no wonder the effect should be disagreeable. But this is the result of want of skill in their combination ; the fault is not in the colours, but in the arrangement. Any face which is deformed, however perfect the individual fea tures, would fail to please ; while the same features, properly put together, would make it beautiful ; and certain musical notes, incorrectly combined, would produce a discord, though the same properly adjusted would produce harmony. So too with colours ; and we find that some, even of those who have always been indifferent to colour, or averse to the use of bright hues, are ready to acknowledge the beauty of certain harmonious combinations, and are surprised at the effect, which they expected to be gaudy and offensive. There are, however, some who are as completely insensible to the effect of such harmony as they are to that of musical sounds ; others, again, have a perverted or false taste ; and others are unable to distinguish colours, being affected by what, is called " colour-blindness." To these three it is useless to appeal; as it would be to expect a person incapable of discovering discordant notes to have an appreciation of harmony in music, But for those who are capable of understanding the har mony of colour, and who only require proper instruction, it is essential that correct examples should be provided, which should be constantly set before them, as the perceptive facul ties may be improved or misled by the frequent contempla tion of perfect or imperfect models. It is therefore of great importance that those who give instruction in the harmony of colours should be thoroughly imbued with the true feeling for it, and should possess that natural perception which, though it may be improved, cannot be obtained by mere study. It is not by forming a theory on some fanciful basis, that a perception of the harmony of colours is to be acquired. Like § 1. HERE THEORY. USELESS. 3 a correct ear for music, it is a natural gift. Theory will not form it, as theory will not enable any one to detect a false note. The power depends on the perceptive faculty; and unless any one possess this, he will vainly attempt to lay down rules for the guidance of others. Yet we find that some have based their notions of the proper arrangement of colour solely on theory ; and others, who might have had a proper feeling for it through their own perceptive faculty, or from the study of good models, have occasionally allowed themselves to be led astray by some plausible assertions, founded upon a fanciful basis, and supported by false rea soning. The same hasty attempts have been made to lay down rules for colour as for form and proportion. These are all dependent on the perceptive faculties ; and it is certainly not by beginning with a theory that any of the three can be taught. The Italians have a remarkable perception of true propor tion, but they did not learn it from a theory, nor do they teach it by rules ; and how would it be possible to define every variety of form and make them all amenable to rules? When we hear a false note, it is not to a theory that we have recourse in order to prove it ; and we can no more help see ing a discord (if we have a true perception of colour) than we can help being struck by a discord in music. If the ear is correct, it will detect the latter ; if the eye is so, it will perceive the former. Neither the eye nor the ear can do otherwise. Theory will not supply the -place of those organs ; and it would be as hopeless to attempt to teach the ear to discriminate between sounds, or the nose to distinguish scents, by rule, as to substitute theory for the perceptive faculty in judging of colour. Mr. Euskin, in his "Elements of Drawing " (p. 248), observes that composition is unreach able, and " no one can invent by rule, though there are some simple laws of arrangement," for which he gives some very B 2 4 ON COLOUR. Paet'I. useful instructions. So too the agreement and disagreement of particular colours must depend on the power of perceiving them; and, as in judging of form and proportion, the eye can only be assisted by certain facts which are the result of observation, but which can never be obtained by mere theory. It is hopeless to begin by teaching this through the ear. The harmony of colour must first be learnt through the eye; and those who teach it must possess the faculty of perceiving? it ; but to begin with a theory is writing the grammar of a language before the language is understood. Nor is it, at any time, possible to reduce it to rules, like a language. And yet instances of this precipitation are constantly occurring; and instead of guiding the eye, which is to be the judge in such matters, there is an attempt to substitute the memory for the perception, and to charge it with rules founded upon some plausible and imaginary data. Because such and such colours stand in a certain relationship to others, or are compounded in a particular manner, it is affirmed that they must there fore accord or disagree with some other one ; and the ques tion asked is not whether they do or do not agree, but whether they ought or ought not to agree. 2. These theories, and the predetermination of what colours should do, put me in mind of a story told me by a German of my acquaintance, who, on his first arrival in London, endea voured to account for all he saw by explanations formed in his mind before he had time to obtain experience, and who thought, as his countrymen too often do, that everything must be subjected to speculation and made amenable to theory. ^ Happening to go into Portman Square, he saw, conspicuous on the facade of one of the houses, a richly painted hatch; ment. He made a note of it ; while he wondered what it meant. But on going into Grosvenor and some other squares, where he also saw other hatchments, he at once formed his theory; and when he entered this among his memoranda: § 2—4. HASTY CONCLUSIONS. 5 " Each square in London is marked by its arms, set up in a conspicuous position on one of the houses," he felt sure he had ascertained the rule that guided us in one of our English customs. 3. Some of those who have formed theories on colours have been equally hasty. Whatever might serve to confirm them has been eagerly laid hold of; and certain analogies between colour and sound have been brought forward to support some preconceived notion. Burnet very justly observes, that in the various theories respecting the harmony and effect of colours there are many points of -coincidence, and much that has a foundation in truth and nature, but which when applied to the examination of the works of those who have excelled in colouring are inapplicable ; and this remark applies with still greater force to the combination of colours for decorative purposes, where nature is not the guide, and where such positive contrasts are allowable, as would be harsh and intolerable in a picture. 4. Among the analogies of colour and sound which have been seized upon to maintain a theory is the discovery made by Newton while investigating the properties of light, " that the lengths of the spaces occupied in the spectrum by the seven primary colours exactly correspond to the lengths of chords that sound the seven notes in the diatonic scale of music." But this was merely the determination of an ac cidental analogy. "Newton on this subject proceeded no further ;" and Hutton has shown the absurdity of pretensions such as Father Castel put forth, of constructing a musical in strument that should present the analogous colours and sounds to the eye and ear. " And if," he adds, " there be any analogy between colours and sounds, they differ in so many other points, that it need excite no wonder that his project should miscarry."* Such an experiment cannot aid the eye in f Hutton's " Recreations," vol. ii. part 4, prob. 55. B 3 6 ON COLOUR. Part I. judging of colour. The fact is most interesting, but it har no bearing on the question, it is only to be used as a simile; and when practice has given us the means of understanding the whole subject, we may amuse ourselves with this or any other speculation on the analogy of colours and sound, with out fear of being drawn thereby into hasty and erroneous conclusions. 5. Every one willingly admits the great utility of rules ; hut we must first make ourselves masters of the subject, and he contented to seek for facts to guide us in their formation. As I have already observed, it is useless to pretend to write a grammar before the language is understood ; and languages were spoken long before grammarians' laid down their rules. In like manner, poetic genius was never obtained by theory; the beauty of proportion and of form, and various harmonious effects, have been appreciated at all times ; and the mark is hit by an arrow, or a ball, without any acquaintance with the curve of a parabola. Again, we hear a sharp sound more readily than a deep one, without having first to understand the nature of quick and slow vibrations ; and we know whether the per fume of a flower is sweet without having to wait for a theory of scent. Experiments, such as looking at a colour through a particular medium with the right, and through a different one with the left, eye, or conjectures denying the existence of more than one primary colour, making yellow a "de clining red and blue privation of light," are interesting as phi losophical inquiries, but are quite irrespective of the effect of colours as they present themselves to the eye under ordinary circumstances, and have no more bearing upon the harmony and combination of various hues than they might have on judging of the beauty and effect of a painting ; and to admit any conclusions from them respecting the concords, or the relationship of colours to each other, has only the effect of substituting theory for fact. § 5,6. FACTS AND THEIR RESULTS. 7 We have now to deal with facts and their results, not with reasons. The elements of ornament may be combined in various ways, and may be equally beautiful in many different combinations, without its being necessary to discover the laws or reasons for that agreement, or to impede our progress at the commencement by speculations which are quite as likely to lead into error as to assist our study. So again with colours : and though the three primaries, blue, red, and yel low, in certain proportions, constitute white light, all inquiries respecting the proper quantities required for it, and every appeal to philosophical experiments, in seeking the proper method of orna/memti/ng with colour, are quite irrelevant ; and the Arabs attained to the great perfection we admire in the Alhambra and elsewhere without theories. It was the practice which gave them their success ; and we shall do well to imitate their example by beginning at the beginning ; and when we have obtained the necessary experience it will be time to promulgate theories based on actual and sound ob servation. We want experience and facts, not conclusions derived from uncertain premises ; and it too often happens, when speculations are allowed to interfere, that the judgment is warped, and practice is made to conform to preconceived notions as erroneous as they are arbitrary. We are too apt to substitute memory for observation, and to teach by rote rather than by conviction or the contemplation of good ex amples ; and many prefer to lay down fanciful rules than to convince by facts. 6. To begin with theory is contrary to all inductive reason ing; which proceeds " from facts to laws, and from laws to causes;" and it is equally inconsistent to seek some difficult explanation while a simple one is within our reach. Yet this is of daily occurrence, and the obvious is overlooked in the search for some recondite reason.* * Thus the learned are more pleased to derive the names Pa (or Ba) b 4 8 ON COLOUR. Past I; It is of more importance for the proper arrangement of colours to ascertain which harmonise in juxtaposition than t& occupy ourselves with abstruse questions- respecting, their properties, or the laws by which they ought to be regulated; which, though they may display great thought and scientific knowledge, are here of little practical use ; and which, like the constitutions of certain wise professors, appear as plausible on paper as they are impossible in practice. 7. From facts and actual experience we may obtain some thing positive and useful; from theory nothing can be expected, so long as the subject itself is not thoroughly understood, ex cept the most vague and contradictory conclusions. We have constant proofs of this. One lays down as an axiom, that as light is composed of the three primaries, those colours, when used in the proportion necessary to form white light, " neu tralise" each other, and should therefore be so employed for decorative purposes. But if when so put together they really did neutralise each other, they would then be deprived of their real effect, and we should counteract the very abject we had in view. To ornament with colour and neutrdlm the colour is a contradiction. But it is supposed to accord . with a theory. Fortunately, however, the three primaries" placed in juxtaposition do accord admirably without under going this metamorphosis; and it has been found neces sary to employ artificial means to obtain any approach (and that too a very imperfect one) to the white light they com- and Ma from verbs meaning " to nourish " and " to fashion " (neither of which indeed is very applicable) than from the two natural and untaught sounds made by infants, to which the signification of father and mother were afterwards applied. Again, the mode of reckoning by tens (at once the most obvious and natural, from the ten fingers) is thought to be " one of the most marvellous achievements of the human mind, based on an abstract conception of quantity, and regulated by ajspirit of philosophical class.ficat.on," and the child Harpocrates, with its finger to its mouth, has been thought to represent « Silence," instead of the idea of « infancy," from a very common habit of young children. § 7,8. EACH COLOUR TO HAVE ITS EFFECT. 9 pose, by whirling round before the eye the object on which those three colours have been painted. But besides that the effect consists only of an approximation to white, it has no bearing on the question of the effect of colour in ornamenta tion, which is (fortunately) never whirled round before the eye ; and so far from desiring to give to the eye the impres sion of white, or of colourless light, in placing before it those three colours, our object is directly the reverse ; we want to ornament with colours, not to deceive with colours, nor to place them so that they may "disappear" or be confounded. And as blue and red in juxtaposition borrow from each other, and assume a purple hue when seen at a short distance, it is found expedient to introduce with them a certain quantity of yellow, or sometimes a small yellow or white line of sepa ration, to keep the two colours distinct. The object is to present each colour as it is, and to give it its own power, that red should appear red, and the same with the rest; care being taken at the same time that the whole combination of various hues shall be in harmony, by being properly balanced throughout the composition. It would be a strange recom mendation for a piece of music so to have the notes put together that they should "neutralise" each other, and that " the constituent" sounds should, like the colours, " disap pear." Such a theory of sound would be novel; the practice far from entertaining. Some, again, use the terms " neutra lised and contrasted" as synonymous ; and I would most gladly adopt these or any other expressions, if I could reconcile their meaning with the effect produced ; as it is of advantage that, as far as possible, we should all employ the same terms. But to neutralise is not to set off a colour ; and this last is obviously the effect of contrast. {See below, Sect. V.) 8. Another tells us that " death of a colour takes place when the primitive (or primary) colours come together in equal proportions ; and when alone, or mixed together in unequal 10 ON COLOUR. PaeiI, proportions, they are living colours;" that "any primitive colour may be destroyed by its opposite derivative" (or acci dental colour, as red by green, blue by orange, in equal propor tions) ; and that any " derivative colour may be destroyed by adding the primitive not contained in it." But without stop ping to discuss this point it is sufficient to observe that the effects of red on green, and of blue on orange, are totally dif ferent ; and if the two former diminish each other's intensity the latter mutually increase theirs, being contrasts, and each giving to its companion its full power. (See below, pp. 61, 62.) Others maintain that harmony of colour depends on the pri maries and their "derivatives" being used in the proportions: of the rainbow; which, according to Newton, are (supposing1 the whole to be 100), red 11, orange 8, yellow 14, green 17, blue 17, purple 11, and violet 22; but it is scarcely neces sary to say that the quantity of the secondary colours (58) compared with that of the primaries (42) would not answer for ornamentation, which depends on the contrast rather than on the blending of colours ; and this shows the fallacy of at tempting to form a theory respecting the harmony of colour from scientific and other irrelevant data. That proportion must be of the highest importance in de corating with colours is most certain; and this applies to every case where the object is to please the eye ; but the con ditions under which they are to be used must be considered; and it is not by seizing upon these or those scientific data that rules are to be obtained for our guidance ; nor will any theory suffice to establish the harmony of colours, or take the place of the eye, by pronouncing beforehand on their effect. And now before I proceed further, I beg to assure the reader that these and whatever other remarks I may offer are not made in a captious spirit, nor with any intention to censure the opinions of others. My object is to place before him simple facts, and notice some of those views which appear to me to § 9- POSITIONS OF COLOURS. 1 1 be erroneous and liable to mislead. I hope also to be ex cused for so often repeating the same remarks ; and though the " decies repetita" may not " please" it may fulfil my ob ject of directing attention to those particular points which appear to be most deserving of it, and induce others to con firm, or (if they really see good reasons for it) to show any error in, my conclusions. Nowhere, perhaps, is it more necessary to detect fallacies than when pointing out- the use of colour. If, then, I notice any word which seems to be employed by some one in a questionable sense, it is merely with the view of preventing a misapprehension of its meaning ; and I gladly abstain from objecting to any theory provided it has no tendency to mislead. To discuss all that have been proposed, or even those relating to the position of different colours in the interior of a building, would neither be neces sary nor desirable ; but I cannot omit to mention one which, from its possessing a certain amount of plausibility, has ob tained many supporters. 9. According to this, because the grass which grows at our feet is green, this colour should be placed at the lower part of a wall ; while the brown earth being below the grass, brown is required to be in a still lower position ; and by a parity of reasoning the sky claims for blue the most exalted place in the interior of a coloured building. As similes, these relative positions of the earth and sky are unobjectionable ; but the moment they are put forth as reasons for the arrangement of their respective colours, they are inadmissible; for though blue demands a prominent place in a ceiling, this is not because the sky is blue : cold transparent colours are of use in that position, as they tend to give suitable lightness to the upper parts of a room ; and it is well known how a proper selection and disposition of colours may convey an impression of additional height, when required, and accord with the gra dations of distance and other necessary conditions. 12 ON COLOUR. PAfcil, For though it has been denied that any effect of distance ' is to be obtained by the use of a particular colour, there is no doubt that a ceiling may to all appearance be raised or lowered by those means ; and blue in many positions seems to recede, while red comes nearer to the eye ; which is fre quently very observable in a coloured glass window. But the ceiling is- not the only position suited for blue; nor can the use of any other colour be determined by its place or quantity in nature. It is true that our grass (the admiration of foreigners) is more abundant on the ground ; yet trees, which rise far above the line of the. eye, have not a less claim to the green hue ; and in most warm countries green is much more common in trees than upon the ground. Is green then to be used in great quantities, or in one position, in England, and in smaller quantities, or in a different position, in the south? is blue to be employed more abundantly in countries where the sky is clear, and are the neutral tints of our cloudy atmo sphere to be adopted for our ceilings ? and is the whole tone of ornamentation to depend on and to be varied according to climate ? If so coloured combinations would differ widely in many places from what is really required by harmony : we should have our autumnal and our spring patterns ; and some coun tries where colours are employed with the greatest profuseness would be limited in their use. The Arabs of the Desert would be condemned to give up the lively carpets they weave, and confine themselves almost entirely to blue (of the sky) and an ochry yellow (of the sand) ; and the Eskimos would be nearly limited to blue and white, as the animals of snowy regions are to the latter hue throughout the winter. On such conditions many colours would be excluded altogether ; and excepting blue (in imitation of water and the sky) the pri maries would be sparingly used in many countries. § 9. USE OF GREEN. 13 Since the harmony of colours is the chief object in their arrangement, it is not to the purpose to observe that the brown earth and green grass in nature are in contact ; the two colours dark brown and green being by no means an agreeable combination ; nor would any one be pleased with the same quantity of green in ornamentation that we see in nature. Indeed, when this is actually copied., we are far from welcoming that abundance of green which gives us a pleasure to behold in the fields ; and the dislike felt for pictures where the greens of our climate predominate is sufficiently proved by our artists preferring to introduce the warm brown tints of autumn ; sometimes even to an extent not quite justified even by that season. Besides, if greens are to belong to the lower parts of a building, we ought to make the bases of columns of that colour ; and where, as Mr. Fal- kener very properly asks, is there " a Greek green, or purple, plinth ?" * Nor is the sky the only place of blue in nature ; it may be found in the low position of water, as green is on the hill side as well as in trees ; and in order to carry out a theory drawn from the general aspect of nature, we should be debarred the use of red, which is nowhere to be seen either in the sky, on the water, or even on the earth except in a few flowers at our feet, and in so minute a quantity com pared with the surrounding scenery as to make red lose all its proportion, and all claim to a place among the colours of a landscape (for it is on the general aspect of the scene, not on the details, that the theory is based) ; and black, a very essen tial colour in ornamentationj would be altogether wanting. Under these conditions the colours in a fine southerly climate would be very limited ; while we should have to be satisfied with those of our grey atmosphere and our neutral tint clouds. Nor is it a libel so to designate their dominant hues, * " Class. Mus." i. p. 100. 14 ON COLOUR. Pabti, since some people in this country have actually recommended them for imitation, and have expressed a reluctance to see bright colours ; maintaining that they are ill suited to our climate and our impressions, and that greys or neutral tints accord with all around" us better than pure blue, red, and yellow, which should be confined to southern countries and clearer atmospheres. But though the blue of the sky is brighter in the south than in our own climate, green and others are more brilliant here ; and if, instead of confining ourselves to the general aspect of nature, we contemplate her more minute works we shall find that brilliantly coloured flowers are not denied to the gloomiest climates ; where the scarlet poppy, the blue cornflower, and the yellow buttercup, with the broom, and the furze, are as bright as any in the south, If we are to imitate nature it will be better to copy her in some of these details than in the general aspect she bears in any one climate ; and she has not taught us to abstain from using brilliant colours in those objects which are the nearest to our sight. But in reality, the question if or where nature uses bright colours is not pertinent to our inquiry respecting their employment for ornamentation. Works of art are not amen able to the same conditions as those of nature, unless they are copies of them. And when some one tells us that in the interior of buildings the stone should retain its ''natural" hue, he seems to forget that a building is not a work of nature, but of art. For though it would be inconsistent to colour trees beneath which we might seek shelter or make an abode, the squared stone and stuccoed walls are under totally different conditions, and are artificial, like the colour required for ornamenting them. 10. The rage for making every thing assume a supposed appearance of nature was almost universal in England till lately. Artificial gardens were exchanged for others with ser- § 10,11. ARRANGEMENT OF GARDENS. lo pentine walks; avenues were cut down or disregarded; the formal beds, balustrades, and terraces of our old gardens were looked upon with horror ; and every part of the ground about a house was required to assume the varied aspect of nature. At the same time, gravel-walks, themselves artificial, were admitted ; and if the rage was not carried quite so far as to allow weeds to grow instead of cultivated flowers, it was equally inconsistent to have the (supposed) wildness of nature about a bouse, which is a work of art,. with its angularity and formal lines. It was a vain endeavour to make two opposite conditions coincide. To be in keeping with the aspect of a house, the garden in its immediate vicinity should agree with its artificial character ; and nothing can be more in ac cordance with the style of that work of art than an orna mental dressed garden, from which the gradation to the wild country should be maintained by a decreasing formality in the grounds as they leave the one and approach the other. "Nothing, indeed," as Sir Walter Scott has well observed, is " more the child of art than a garden ;" " and flights of steps, balustrades, vases, and architectural ornaments," says Price, " are not more unnatural, i.e. not more artificial, than the house they are intended to accompany." The change from the old dressed garden was the consequence of the fantastic caprices of the Dutch (by whom it was caricatured) having been brought into England. A reaction then took place in favour of nature, and the opposite extreme of irregularity succeeded. But it was equally studied and unnatural ; and as it was done without regard to adaptability, and without a reason, the result was the anomalous juxtaposition of two incompatible ideas. The same is now attempted in the colouring of works of art : and as it is equally inconsistent, it must equally lead to error. 11. The notion that the quantity or the arrangement of colours is to be taken from nature is obviously erroneous ; and 16 ON COLOUR. PABiI. so far from green being employed in the large masses she spreads before us, its use should rather be confined to lighting up a coloured composition, for which it is admirably suited. It may also be introduced in larger proportions, when intended to be seen by candlelight, which improves green, while it interferes with the effect of blue ; and this change sufficiently shows how different are the conditions of colour for orna mentation and in nature. So far, indeed, from adopting the quantities and arrangements of colours in nature for that pur pose, we should generally deviate widely from them; and who could think of using in decoration the same quantity of green with which she covers the large expanse of a landscape, or of introducing in any one part of a building the mass of green we see in a single tree ? It is reposing to the eye to look upon the great quantity of green in nature, and there is no other colour on which the eye can dwell continually with out fatigue ; but in ornamenting with colours we do not seek the same repose which is there required ; we seek rather a contrary effect, as in music we are not satisfied with the melody of natural sounds, but delight in that harmony which is as artificial as the combination of positive colours for deco rative purposes. Nor is it our object to have a repetition oi the least fatiguing colour, or of the least effective piece of music ; however soothing green and natural melody may be. 12. The introduction of great quantities of green is one of the mistakes which always creeps in when society becomes artificial, and is one of the signs of a want or of a decline of taste. The very general use of the primaries, frequently with the addition of black and white, and a little green, marks the taste of people before they become artificial, and before the true perception of colour becomes blunted; and experience abun dantly proves, that at first pure taste showed a preference for the primaries, and that it was only when it began to be cor rupted that a superabundance of the secondaries were ad- §12.13. USE OF GREEN. 17 mitted. And thus, in their later monuments, the Egyp tians so increased the proportions of green they had pre viously used with red, blue, yellow, white, and black, that in the time of the Ptolemies green was the dominant colour, extending even over the whole capital of a column. The number of their colours was always limited ; these six, some times with gold, were almost the only ones employed on their monuments; brown, purple, and orange-red were rare, ex cept on papyri, and to these, in later times, pink was added, with orange-red. The Greeks, in hke manner, used green very sparingly for ornamentation in their buildings, where red, blue, yellow and gold, black and purple, with some green and white, were the most common * ; and the favourite colours of the Israelites were blue, scarlet, purple, and gold, sometimes on a blue, sometimes on a white (linen) ground. 13. The same dominant use of the primary colours may be remarked in the draperies painted by the early masters of Italy. Nor did they attach importance to landscapes ; their subjects were human figures; and as early poetry treats of persons rather than detailed descriptions of scenery, so early painting preferred the human figure. It is only when people become artificial, and have long led the conventional life of towns, that they begin to show an unreasonable preference for rural scenes in painting ; and it is then that the reaction in favour of the natural takes place, which has been so well described by Mr. Buskin. (" Lectures on Painting," iii.) But I am far from wishing to underrate the beauty of land scape, or from thinking that admiration of scenery misplaced, which is so much felt in this country. And if it be true that the Greeks and Bomans of old, or the Italians and others of southern climates at the present day, have not enjoyed * See below, § 55 Sections HI. and IV.; and Part II. § 59, 60. C 18 ON COLOUR. Past I. picturesque scenery in the same degree as ourselves*, I should be sorry to imitate them in this particular. But that admiration of nature is distinct from a pre ference for landscape in painting; and its selection as the favourite subject for art. Indeed the grandest scenes, most admired in nature, are not always the best suited for a picture ; the scenery of Switzerland is grand arid commands enthusiastic admiration, but it is not always suited for a picture, from the great disproportion of the mountains to the foreground ; and we must be satisfied to admire in nature many scenes not to be transferred to canvas. Connected with this predilection for landscape is that fondness for green already deprecated; and so habitual has this predilection become, that we use the expression "copying from nature," as if it only implied drawing, or painting, landscape. It is in this too that some seek for every illus tration of colour, forgetting that what suits a landscape does not necessarily suit a building, or any other work of art. 14. It may be admitted, as Burnet observes, that the colours to which the eye is accustomed in nature are those that are to be sought for in a landscape-painting: "such as blue, white, or gray in skies ; green, in trees and grass ; brown or warm grey in earth, road, or stone." But this is a totally different question from the treatment of pure, flat, positive, colours used for decorative purposes, where no "toning to those hues most common in nature " is required, or admissible. The painting is a copy of nature, not so a building, or a carpet. Attention to the due " equilibrium " may be neces sary in one as in the other; but from the use of mixed, or compound, hues in the former, and of positive or pure colours in the latter, their treatment, as well as their effect, is very * I am not however disposed to think that the ancients were indifferent to the beauties of natural scenery ; and I have no doubt that to Horace the " domus Albunece resonantis, et prasceps Anio, et Tiburni lucus," were as pleasing as they would have been to any of us. §14,15. COLOURS FROM NATURE. 19 distinct; and while in paintings, especially landscapes, the colouring chiefly consists of various combinations far removed from the primaries, in ornamentation the due effect is pro duced by the union of positive colours, most of which should be primaries. But the quantity of each colour need not, as some suppose, be made to accord with that in the prism and the rainbow ; and there is no more reason for this than for always arranging colours in the same order as they appear in the prism. The quantity of different colours will also depend on the place, or the position, where they are to be introduced, on the character of a building, and on various conditions; their quality too must depend on circumstances; and the same colours will have a very different effect when seen by candle-light and in the light of day. 15. Some there are who maintain that because in nature cer tain two colours a*re found in juxtaposition, they must neces sarily be concords ; and cite those in various flowers to support their argument ; but they forget that besides the petals and the leaves, their eye sees at the same time the yellow anthers, the brown stalk, or other coloured objects, even when the flower is plucked, and many more when it is viewed in the bed where it grows. The light and shade, and sometimes the semi-transparency of the petals, also give to the hues in flowers a somewhat different effect from what they would have as flat colours. But whatever may be the cause of the difference, there is no doubt of the fact, and this is all that is necessary for us to notice in considering the agree ment or disagreement of the colours. If too, in the great variety of combinations presented to us by nature, there must necessarily be perfect harmony; and if nature is expected always to supply us with concords, we shall have no choice left but to receive the most opposite combinations with equal favour. The same acceptation of the colours- of nature as necessary concords must on these conditions be c 2 20 ON COLOUR. Paei I. extended to sounds ; and we must at least allow her the credit of giving them to the notes of birds, and the voices of other animals; yet every one will admit that the sounds uttered by a parrot and a pig, though quite natural, are far from agree able. So too with flowers ; and as some are most beautiful and harmonious in their colours, others are discordant : and few persons will go so far as to maintain that all nature's works are equally pleasing, or that the figures of all animals being beautiful, we are to admire the hippopotamus, or other hideous creatures, as well as the most graceful. It might be as reasonable to maintain that every odour in nature is agreeable, as that every combination of colour in nature is so. But those who appeal to nature as their guide should rather consult the natural taste of man in colour ; and this they will most certainly find to be most in accordance with the coloured ornamentation of the best periods, and of people most remarkable for taste in this particular. y 16. The coloured works of the Arabs and other orientals will illustrate the fact of the early combinations of colours being the most perfect, and at the same time afford an insight into the proper principle of arranging them in carpets, and similar ornamental fabrics. Here we see that the colour, not the pattern, was the (chief object ; and, though they of all people had the greatest facility in combining regular geometrical pat terns, they abstained from introducing them into carpets. The reason was obvious. The effect was to be produced by colours ; they therefore made these the principal features, and showed by the indistinctness of the patterns how secondary a place the latter were to hold in the composition. And here I cannot abstain from noticing some very- sensible remarks by Mr. Giles on this very point : that " colour, and not the pattern, is the primary source of interest in such cases, as in the ordinary Turkey carpet, in which no one looks for a pattern ; and while our Axminsters, Wiltons, and Kidderminsters, the designs of § 16. EARLY STYLE OF COLOUR. 21 which have been considered rather than the harmony of their colours, are so distressing in their obtrusive roses and cornu copias, the incomprehensible and oft-repeated interlaced design of the old Turkish carpet seems never to weary." Those coloured oriental fabrics also show how superior were the earlier to the later productions ; and how in recent times there has been a tendency to admit a greater admixture of green* and other compound colours. And though Orientals have deviated less than most people from the purity of their early taste, they have introduced a more artificial manner into some of their modern carpets and other coloured orna ments. They admit fewer innovations than Europeans in their customs and tastes, and the change in colour is also less marked among them ; but a false taste seems to be gradually influencing some of their modern fancy-works (accelerated perhaps by the selection of the purchasers), though they still ^exhibit a far greater perception of the harmony of colour than the western more civilised and more artificial com munities. To such a degree do the Arabs possess this faculty, that were any of their children furnished by chance with a number of colours, and requested to form them into a pattern, they would be sure to arrange them in some pleas ing concord ; and many a toy they make is remarkable for the beauty of its coloured ornaments. Thirty or forty years ago, even in the streets of Cairo (where early taste has so long "been corrupted, and where it is so inferior to that of the Arabs), the most striking combinations of colour might be seen in the hands of the unsophisticated mem bers of the community; and the artistic judgment of our Consul-General, the late Mr. Salt, aided by long acquaintance with the oriental practice of harmonising colours, often induced him to buy some of the playthings of children, for * Not only in grounds, but in mixed patterns. See below, on " Grounds," Sect. IX c 3 22 ON COLOUR. Paei I, the beauty of their fancy designs. Among these I remember an orange, into the surface of which they had cut a mosaic pattern, leaving the orange rind as a ground, and filling in all the triangular and other hollows with various brilliant colours; than which (comparing small things with great) nothing could be found more harmonious in the mosaics of Italy, or of Damascus, or on the walls of the Alhambra. 17. In Europe it is among the Italians that we find the truest perception of the harmony of colour; and it would be far better for those in England who attempt coloured decoration to follow the taste of Italy in this matter, than to adopt the crude notions of some northern people. A blind predilection for German examples is specially to be shunned ; for though some modern Germans (as Hess and others) do possess a proper appreciation of colour, the general character of their coloured ornamentation is utterly at variance with harmony; and a dingy green is often put in juxtaposition with straw- berry-and-cream colour, with an evident innocence (or per haps in obedience to some learned theory) which proves how little they are aware of these two forming a most disagreeable discord. An impression of some of these German mistakes may be obtained from the lower part of the great staircase of the British Museum ; from the windows of the south aisle of Cologne cathedral, by Cornelius ; and from the corridor and other parts of that frightful building the Pinako- thek of Munich. ' The Italians, on the other hand, free from any grass, or other, theory, and guided by the eye, adopt more primary colours for ornamentation. They fearlessly use blues, and reds, and yellows ; greens and other compound hues being in smaller proportions; and they obtain a balance of tone by placing near the ground deeper, or fewer transparent, hues, than in the upper parts of a wall, thereby giving an appear ance of lightness to the higher portions of the building.* * Examples of this may be mentioned in the Palazzo Martinengo at Brescia, § 17, 18. BRIGHT COLOURS IN NORTHERN CLIMATES. 23 18. If the reason of our preferring dull to brilliant colours is (as some suppose) attributable to the grey tints of our northern atmosphere, how is it that other northern people use colours as vivid as those of the south? The Indians of North America, the Eskimos, and the peasants of Northern Eussia and Siberia, ornament their fancy trinkets with the same bright combinations as the Arabs. The colours they prefer are the primaries; and brilliant hues hold a conspicuous place in their simple patterns. Nor are those colours ex cluded from the ornamental works and porcelain of the Chinese; though these last are often deficient in form and elegance of design. It is not our climate which has made us indifferent to the beauty of colour. England, some centuries ago (as Mr. Cutts very properly observes), was not externally so colourless as now. The groups then seen in public on grand occasions were " clad in bright colours : " knights wore " ar mour of silver scales, covered by a jupon of azure, embroidered with armorial bearings," and were mounted on gaily capa risoned steeds ; and those who were the spectators at a tour nament, or who attended any festive meeting, were " gay as a flock of tropical birds ; " while the windows of the castle, or the houses of the towns, were hung with draperies rich in brilliant hues. Public monuments were decorated with painted ornaments, as well as the interiors of houses ; and the church was rich with colour throughout. The brilliant glass window did not then offer an incongruous contrast to white walls, as in our modern churches ; nor did the ceiling, isolated from the rest of a room by whitewash, proclaim a thorough disregard for all agreement with the general effect of the coloured furniture and hangings ; and the painted representa tions of churches and domestic apartments in those days, as given in PI. xxix. of Griiner's Fresco in Decorations ; in the Chartreuse at Pavia, PI. ix. ; and in the Church of St. Maurice at Milan, PI. xi. c 4 24 ON COLOUR. PAM L well as the remains of colour on various monuments, show how universal was the employment of brilliant ornamentation in this, as in other countries. 19. There is an inconsistency in our estimation of colour: we admire and use it in* some places, while we affect to be above its employment in others. Our taste is artificial, and it is, therefore, undecided and ill-defined. When our cathedrals were built they were ornamented with colour throughout; they were not considered finished without it; every tomb afterwards put into them had its painted devices and mould ings ; and the glass window was part of the whole coloured decoration. Colour was with all people in old times a neces sary accessory to architecture ; and it was equally held to be so in England. / " The builders of those cathedrals," says Mr. Euskin*, "laid upon them the brightest colours they could obtain, and there is not, as far as I can learn, in Europe any j monument of a truly noble school which has not been either painted all over, or originally touched with paint, mosaic, and gilding in its prominent parts. Thus far Egyptians, Greeks, Goths, Arabs, and mediaeval Christians all agree; none of them when in their right senses ever think of doing without paint." Our indifference to colour then is sanctioned neither by ancient usage nor by good taste. There even lingers among us an admiration for the obsolete scarlet cloaks of our peasantry, — one of the few remains of old times ; and it was long the habit of our painters to introduce the contrast of blue and red costumes into their landscapes. The colours too which we used in our early cathedrals were (as in other countries when good taste prevailed regarding them) chiefly the primaries; those buildings which had a superabundance of green 'and other compound and mixed colours having been subsequently repainted; and the changes | * " Stones of "Venice," ii. p. 90. § 19. NATURAL TASTE FOR COLOUR. 25 at this later period may be at once verified by comparing them with the dominant colours of the unchangeable glass windows of the earlier age, executed in the. 1200* and the following century. From all this it follows that the neutral tint " quiet colour " of England (which many people of demure habits seem to associate with propriety, as if the beautiful was connected with sin), the browns and yellows of a Flemish painted glass window, or the dull hues of the dingy Dutch carpet, are not attributable to any malady of vision produced by a murky northern atmosphere ; they are rather owing to the loss of the natural and true perception of colour, and to its not having yet been succeeded by a knowledge of it ob tained from good precepts. The one has been lost, and the other has not yet been acquired. It must be admitted that the painted glass windows of our cathedrals generally find favour even with the English ; it is, therefore, surprising that so many should be inconsistent enough to deny any colour to the rest of the building ; those who have objected to this, both on the window and the wall, are at least more consistent ; and a better excuse may be found for their prejudice than for the caprice of placing a coloured window only at the east end of a church, where it stands in glaring contrast to all the rest of the whitewashed building ; and where, from its generally affecting to imitate a "painting," it has all the appearance of a transparent blind. Some again object to coloured glass because the light of the sun, passing through that variegated medium, injures the effect of the pictures which may be in the church; biit this objection is not a fair one; for, as I have elsewhere observed (Part II. § 58), such works of art, on * I hope I may be excused for using this "mode of expressing dates, in pre ference to the usual one. It prevents that confusion of 13th and 14th centuries, and the necessity of recollecting, when we say 13 or 14, that we mean 12 or 13. The only deviation from this will be in the " 1st century," which it will be necessary to retain. 26 ON COLOUR. PAET I. panel or canvas, are out of place there ; and if they are inter fered with by the colour of the glass, as they are by cross- lights, or by being placed under a window, or within a dark recess over an altar, or by any other accident of position, to which they are constantly subject in a church, the fault is not in the building, but in the unsuitableness of the place. They should not be there. When the walls of a Gothic church are decorated with painted designs which form part of the whole coloured building, those designs must be subservient to the effect of the general ornamentation ; but this is a condition to which the "painting" on panel or canvas is never expected to conform. And if the iridescent hues, sometimes thrown on a wall by the sun's rays passing through a coloured window, inter fere with the proper effect of the ornamentation upon that wall, that is after all only a momentary disadvantage, similar to that of the sun itself shining directly upon it through an uncoloured glass window, which would equally interfere, for the moment, with the effect of its colours. On the other hand I cannot agree with those who think the iridescent colour thrown on the opposite wall, or on the pavement, is any reason for .em ploying painted glass windows. Besides, this is quite tran sitory, and a " separable accident," and has nothing whatever to do with the colour of the building ; the beauty and effect of which must depend on its own fcerits. There are, however, some churches, the style and decoration of which neither require nor accord with coloured glass, as those of the Ee- naissance, painted with large frescoes, where coloured glass windows would conceal and interfere with their effect ; and in such buildings the windows are made of plain transparent glass, in order to admit all the light required for that species of ornamentation. Nor would painted glass be suited to a building of Gothic style, decorated with fresco paintings* such as Giotto's Chapel at Padua. 20. And here I maybe permitted to offer a few remarks on § 20. COLOURED GLASS WINDOWS. 27 coloured glass; particularly in reference to its employment for windows in Gothic churches. Among the various kinds of coloured ornamentation, which have justly claimed attention at the present day, are glass windows ; and great advances have been made in the manu facture, as well as in the arrangement, of painted glass for our churches. We have fortunately many excellent examples remaining of this kind of decoration, especially in the ec clesiastical buildings of France ; and the specimens of dif ferent periods are such as to enable us to judge of the effects and merits of their various styles, and to determine which are most eligible as our guides. France was long noted for its superiority in painted glass windows ; and already in the time of Theophilus, who flourished according to the most satisfactory evidence "in the XHth century," France was the country which had then made the greatest advance ment in this species of ornamentation. For in enumerat ing in his Preface the various subjects he is about to treat of in his work, " Bwersarwm Artium Schedula," he assigns to Greece * the superiority in the kinds and mixtures of divers colours (as well as in the manufacture of the brightest transparent coloured glass cups, in glazing pottery with vitrifiable colours by the action of fire and enamelling, and in various processes of ornam&ntal glass-work: — ii. 14, 16); to Tuscany, in various kinds of enamel ; to Arabia, in malleable, or fusible, and chased, work ; to Italy, in the variety of vases, the decoration with gold, and the carving of gems and ivory ; to France, in the precious variety of wi/ndows; and to Germany, in the delicate workmanship of gold, silver, copper, iron, wood, and stone. * Art among the Byzantine Greeks is said to have fallen " in the 8th, 9th, and 10th centuries," and to have "improved again under the Comneni in the 12th century." (Lord Lindsay, ii. p. 54.) Thus the mosaics of S. Apollinare at Kavenna, of the middle of the 500, are better than those of S. Mark's of the 900, and the following century. 28 ON COLOUR. Past I. It is true that Italy also had painted glass ; and that at a very early period, some at Siena being of 1230 ; but coloured glass windows were not generally adopted in Eoman churches; and if in those of Northern Italy they were used, and some, as at Perugia and elsewhere, were very beautiful in colour and design, they were not of the same early period of which Theophilus speaks ; nor do we now find in Italy the numerous brilliant specimens of glass windows which abound in France of the 1200 and the following century. Indeed, the earliest specimens oi painted glass windows in western Europe are in France, some of which date before the end of the 1 100 ; as in the Abbey of St. Denis, where the first crusade is represented on glass of the year 1194. Painted glass windows were also made in Flanders and Germany in the 1200; but France claims the precedence ; and Suger, Abbot of St. Denis, is said to have patronised the art of painting on glass in France in 1152. It is difficult to ascertain how France arrived at the art of painting glass, or whence she derived the first elements of that knowledge. Some have at once pronounced that it was from the Byzantine Greeks, and there is no doubt that coloured glass had been used for windows by them, long before it was employed for that purpose in Western Europe. But those which remain are of stained, not painted, glass; and they afford no decisive solution of the question. The same were adopted by the early Arabs from the Greeks, who • had used them long before the Arab conquests began; and about the year 400; Prudentius (as Labarte has shown) speaks of the employment of glass, in the basilica of San Paolo-fuori- le-mura at Eome, built by Constantine; where, he says, "in the rounded windows are displayed panes of glass of various colours : thus do the windows shine when decorated with the flowers of spring." " The existence of coloured windows " is again more distinctly mentioned "in the 6th century" § 21- STAINED GLASS. 29 (Labarte, "Handbook of the Arts of the Middle Ages," p. 66), and Pope Leo IIL, in 816, adorned those in the apse of S. Giovanni Laterano, " with glass of various colours." It is evident then, that stained glass windows were used during the 300, in the age of Constantine, and they are even ad mitted to have been known in the previous century. That it was likely to be adopted for windows in hot climates as soon as the art of applying it became known, is highly probable ; as the direct transition of heat is less through coloured, than through white, glass ; and for this reason the Arabs in Egypt and elsewhere preferred the former, whenever they glazed the windows of their mosks or dwellings. De barred as they always were from the representation of the human figure *, they only introduced conventional forms ; and their patterns, which frequently resemble, rather than imitate, a flower rising from a fanciful root, or a vase, are composed of various pieces of coloured glass (according to the earliest method), each surrounded and separated from its neighbour by a thin partition composed of egg and gypsum, in lieu of lead- work. The windows are small, both in the mosks and houses ; and the former are generally made up of geometrical patterns and other devices. 21. Colourless glass windows (" speculariorum usum, perlu- cente testa, clarum transmittentium lumen,") were already used in the age of the first Caesars, as shown by Seneca (Ep. 90, p. 398), and perhaps also by Philo Judseus (Leg. ad Ca.); and Seneca says (Ep. 86, p. 373), " rusticitatis damnant Scipionem, quod non in caldarium suum latis specular ibus diem admise- rat." And though talc or other translucid substances might pos sibly be implied, Seneca's speaking of the "multa, luce" would rather require them to be glass; " specularia " was the name * The few instances where figures have been introduced by the Arabs in Spain, and by the Moslems in Persia, are not sufficient to disprove the force of the injunction. The same remark may apply to the cherubim of the Jews. 30 ON COLOUR. Paei I. given to glass windows or panes ; and paintings on glass were long known in Eome. Moreover, the fact of glass panes having been made before a.d. 79, has been established by the discovery of one at Pompeii, as well as by the fragments of others found at Herculaneum. These, it is true, are colourless ; but glass of various hues was employed for many purposes : for making beads, false stones, and other objects of ornament and utility, in the Augustan age at Eome.* Seneca (Ep. 86.) speaks of Eoman ceilings quite covered with glass (vitro absconditur camera) ; and glass mosaic is said by Pliny to have been introduced into Italy by Agrippa. Indeed, glass ornaments were brought from Egypt long before; as at the fete given to the Eoman people by Scaurus, and on other oc casions, when they were worn as personal trinkets, in ac cordance with a common custom in Egypt ; where coloured glass was very generally employed for Ornaments of different kinds, as well as for vases, for false stones, and for many purposes. f Egypt indeed had for ages been famed for its manufacture of glass, and it was doubtless from Egypt that Sidon and afterwards Tyre, and at a much later time the Eomans, learnt this valuable art. It is scarcely worth while to refute the story told by Pliny of the supposed discovery' by some Phoenician sailors returning from Egypt, with a cargo of natron, which they could only have required for the very purpose of making glass, the knowledge of which they had derived from that country ; and the accidental discovery of glass-making could only be. looked for in the land which pro duced the natron. But a more decisive proof of its having * See Part II. § 86. See also Raoul-Rochette, "Peintures Antiques," p. 368 —390, &c. f Probably, as at Rome, for magnifying objects. Seneca (N. Q. i. 3, p. 834) says : " Poma per vitrum adspicientibus multo majora sunt ;" and (i. 6, p. 837) "formossiora quam sint videntur si innatant vitro." A lens has even been found at Pompeii, and another at Nineveh. Nero having weak eyes used a green glass (said to be an emerald) when looking at the gladiatorial shows : " spectabat Smaragdo." (Plin. xxxvii. 51.) §21. EARLY USE OF GLASS. 31 originated in Egypt is afforded by the oldest records that re main, of a time too when there is no appearance of its being recorded as a new discovery : and the simple process of glass- blowing is represented in the usual way among the Egyptian sculptures of the time of King Shafre, the founder of the second Pyramid, about 2400 b.c. The process too of staining glass of various colours, is shown to have been employed about the same period; and the method of cutting and en graving it is proved by a large bead, bearing the name of one of the Pharaohs, to have been known at least as early as 1460 B.C. Glass was one of the exports of the country; one kind could only be made there ; and so celebrated was Egypt for the excellence and abundance of its glass, that it consti tuted part of the tribute imposed upon the Egyptians by Augustus. It was of the most varied hues ; and the many- coloured ornaments superadded to the surface of the vases, and other objects, and fixed by the blowpipe or the furnace, are referred to by Martial *, and are seen in those many-hued cups found in Egypt (and elsewhere), which are doubtless imitations of the real murrhine t, a stone answering to none other than fluor spar, which bears an evident resemblance to those productions of the Egyptian glass-makers. The immense emeralds mentioned by Pliny and others were glass ; so too were many cups and ornamental objects, noted for their richness, in the low ages ; as the supposed emerald dish called " Sagro cateno," of Genoa, which " came into possession of the Genoese, as an equivalent for a large sum of money, at the taking of Csesarea in Syria ; and which, * See Martial's Epigram, xiv. 115. " Adspicis ingenium Nili, quibus addere plura P>um cupit, ah quoties perdidit auctor opus." t Pliny (xxxvi. 26) says this was imitated in glass : " fit et album et mur- rhinum." (See xxxvii. 2.) 32 ON COLOUR. Past I. pawned in 1319, was redeemed for 1200 marks of gold, or about 3000Z." Pliny, speaking of false stones, says the emerald was the most easily imitated ; and glass cups, com bining in their patterns many different hues, were made in Egypt, and afterwards at Eome, without cracking, — an art now lost, and vainly attempted of late at Venice.* Coloured glass was therefore a very old invention ; and if it was not employed at Eome for windows, the mode of making flat panes of white glass had long been known ; and it is probable that the coloured material was used for the same purpose, at a much earlier time than is generally supposed. Indeed, the figurative allusion by St. Paul to seeing through a glass darkly, shows that the habit of looking through stained glass was sufficiently common to be taken as a metaphor. Colourless panes of glass having been once adopted, the use of coloured ones would naturally follow, as soon as the want was felt ; and the art of colouring glass having long been known, we can readily account for their being employed at the comparatively late time of Constantine. Their intro duction into Western Europe from Byzantium, the repository of all the arts after his age, is therefore only what might be expected. 22. The art of making glass had first gone from Egypt to Eome, and thence, in after times, to Constantinople ; but it is uncertain whether the Venetians introduced it directly from Egypt, to which country they traded at the beginning of the 800 a.d., or from Constantinople. Their first glass-manu factories were established on the island of the Eialto ; and. afterwards in different parts of Venice, until the numerous fires they caused induced the Senate to confine all glass- blowing operations to the isle of Murano, where they are * I observed that at Murano they were obliged to form an interior layer or coating of glass, on which they placed the exterior face when this was of many colours. §22,23. ORIGIN OF STAINED GLASS. 33 still carried on ; but the art was long kept a profound secret, and any one betraying it was condemned to the galleys. Venice, therefore, had alone the advantage of supplying other European markets with this valuable commodity, which found its way into many countries, and even to China ; glass was employed by her in the manufacture of false stones, as well as various useful and ornamental objects; and so highly was it prized, that slaves were ransomed with it from the coast of Barbary.* To an early intercourse with Venice might reasonably be attributed the introduction of the art of staining glass into France ; and the manufacture of enamelled waref at Limoges is said by the Abbe Texier to have owed its origin to a colony of Venetians, who settled there in 979, and who had with them many Byzantine artists. This settlement was connected with their trade in spices and oriental stuffs, brought in their ships from Egypt to Marseilles ; and the fact of the builder of St. Mark's, the Doge Pietro Orseolo I., soon after he abdicated the Dogeship, having fixed his residence in France (a.d. 978), is another proof of the intimate relations which subsisted at that period between the Venetians and the French. To the same Doge Orseolo has been ascribed the erection of the church of St. Front at Perigueux— a building supposed to have been copied from St. Mark's at Venice, but with the pecu liarity of pointed arches ; which also occur in several of the early churches in that neighbourhood of the same Byzantine style. 23. The manufacture of stained glass evidently came to France either directly from the Greeks of Constantinople, or through the Venetians ; and it would not be difficult to account for Byzantine influence extending to France, when the Greeks * According to the advice of Marco Polo. f The Romans were acquainted with real enamelling as well as the inlaying of the material within raised metal borders (a cloisons, or cloisonne'). D 34 ON COLOUR. PabtI. abounded in Italy ; and when the marriage of Otho II. with Theophania, daughter of Nicephorus Phocas, in 967 A.D., brought so many Greek artificers into Western Europe. The leading country in art always has had an influence on other people; and this of Byzantium was even felt, in a minor degree in Britain and Ireland at those early periods. , Mr. Whinston cites proofs of the early French painted glass displaying Byzantine features, and traces a resemblance between the glass paintings of the middle of the 1100, and the illuminations of contemporary Greek MSS. ; and he thinks that " the glass-paintings which, on the whole, most closely resemble the antique, are those executed between 1170 and 1240, or thereabouts." These Byzantine features, however, are disputed by some French writers of eminence, who,. maintain that though the use of stained glass for win dows was adopted by the Byzantine Greeks long before it was known in France, the art of painting on glass was a French invention. But here again the Greeks have a prior claim; as Theophilus (ii. 14) shows that they painted glass and burnt in the colours at the same period; and no one will maintain that they derived the secret from the French. And though he mentions the painted glass windows of France, " he attributes," as Labarte observes, " to the Greeks alone the production of vases of ornamental glass," and the French, even in " the fourteenth century," had recourse to the Greeks for every "piece of decorated glass."* 24. The distinction between stained and painted glass con sists in the former being of one uniform hue, while in the latter the colour is applied to the white surface and then burnt in. This .last is used in the "Enamel Method," which admits no stained glass, and requires the whole picture to be painted on the previously colourless surface. The other is called the " Simple Mosaic Method," and in it the whole picture is made * Labarte, « Handbook of the Arts of the Middle Ages," pp. 336, 337. § 21, 25. ORIGIN OF PAINTED GLASS. 35 up of pieces of stained glass, according to the colours re quired to form it. There is also a third, called the " Mosaic Enamel Method," in which some portions are of stained, others of coloured glass, combining the two former methods, though this last distinction is not always maintained. What is generally called mosaic glass has really some of its details and shadows marked out by colour ; and of this kind are the earliest windows of the 1100 and 1200 in France. For though composed of coloured pieces of glass, held together by the leads which form the outlines of the designs, the shading is made by lines in bistre laid upon the surface, and afterwards burnt in; and the same colour* is used for some of the details and folds of draperies. The art gradually grew out of the original simple mosaic process. But it has long been a question when and where the first idea originated of adding the few shades and bistre lines ; for in that was the germ of the enamel process and the real origin of painted glass. 25. In arguing this question it has been observed, on the one hand, that the hard outlines formed by the lead-work and the line-shading are consistent with the character of Byzan tine paintings; on the other, that those formal outlines merely resulted from the mode of fixing the pieces of glass, and that the Byzantine character of the figures would only show that they were copied, like many early paintings, from Greek models ; while some have made this more pertinent remark, that if the discovery of the new art of painting on glass had been made in France, it could not have been unknown to Theophilus, and that he would have noticed an innovation introduced about his time. There is, however, no need of conjecture ; and, as I have already shown (p. 27), he actually states that it was practised by the Byzantine Greeks. And if we find no specimens of the * Some bright lights were scratched in a superadded coat of bistre. d 2 36 ON COLOUR. Paet I. painted windows in their churches, still the direct evidence of Theophilus suffices to establish their prior claim to the use of painted glass, as well as to the manufacture of painted glass vases, for which they were celebrated at the same period.* Our not finding painted windows in Byzantine churches may also be explained by the fact of their walls having been generally decorated with coloured subjects, whose effect would have been impaired by the coloured windows ; still, this does not disprove an acquaintance with coloured glass, or even its occasional use in these and other buildings ; as the absence of the arch from the temples of Egypt does not disprove its inven tion in that country, or its frequent employment in houses and tombs. The extent of the claim which is to be conceded to the French is their having generally introduced it into churches; and though the first idea of burning in the colours was derived from the same source whence the composition of the simple stained window was obtained, this honour of priority may be accorded to the Byzantine Greeks without detracting from the merit due to the French of having been the first to bring the art of painted glass to a perfection which the Greeks could never have attained. The glory of Italy in the art of painting has not been diminished by the fact of her having been indebted to Byzantine models ; and France may well be satisfied in having carried glass-painting to perfection, and in having been the first to give it that brilliancy which constitutes the merit of this beautiful art. 26. The main point to which it is my object to direct atten tion is the choice of style in coloured windows ; and the one which should be selected for our study and imitation is cer tainly the mosaic glass of the 1200. It is true that the glass of the next century (the 1300) was often richer in colour; but the question now relates to the arrangement of colours * The Greeks established this manufactory at Damascus also ; and painted glass vases from Syria may still be seen in some of the mosks in Cairo. § 2«. MOSAIC WINDOWS. 37 and the character of the ornamentation, not to the excellence of the colour imparted to the material. Convinced that the best arrangement of colours is to be found in the windows of the 1200, and that the principle was to make the windows part of the general composition of the whole coloured build ing, I agree with Labarte that the merit of those windows "is their perfect harmony with the general effect of the edifices to which they belong. At whatever distance we examine them, we are struck by the elegance of their form and the brilliancy of their colour. The artist has had no intention of executing an independent work; he has given himself little trouble about a faithful copy of nature ; his whole aim has been to contribute, under the direction of the architect, to the ornamentation of the building; and he has never failed of success, through the skilful arrangement and harmo nious distribution of his colours, which, notwithstanding their brilliancy, shed over the interior of the temple a mys terious light, adding much to the solemn grandeur of the architecture. The harmony of effect did not exclude a rich ness of detail. The mosaics of the grounds, and the borders which surround them, are always of graceful patterns, of infi nite variety, and of charming originality. The subjects are characterised by a touching simplicity, neither devoid of life nor movement." As the deeper shadows admitted into them are made by lines, and some lighter ones by smear-shadows, they are not open to the same objection as the dark con tinuous shades of the late enamel glass, which interfere too much with the transmission of light, and have a heavy appear ance from the light being so unequally intercepted by large opaque shadows. The general arrangement in the mosaic windows is a series of medallions, or lozenges, surrounded by, or imbedded in, a coloured mosaic ground, which, together with the medallions and a rich border, form the whole composition of each D 3 38 ON COLOUR. PaetL coloured light. They have, by way of distinction, been called medallion windows : as those with figures of saints under canopies have received the name of canopied windows.* 27. The medallion window belongs to that period when single lights, either roundheaded or lancet shape, were used, though it was also continued, particularly in France, long after the mullioned window had taken the place of the single lancet. Subjects selected from the Bible and Testament are repre sented in the medallions, where the figures are few, and dis tinct, as in antique compositions. The medallions themselves are circular or oval, trefoils or quatrefoils, or of other shapes, each containing its separate picture; while some of larger size are subdivided into two or more compartments, each having its own subject ; and the greatest variety of the forms and arrangements of the medallions may be seen in the beautiful windows of the cathedrals of Bheims, Chartres, Bourges, Auxerre, and Sens, Hfee Sainte-CJhapelle, and other French churches. The intermediate spaces between the medallions, extending to the border of each Hght, are occupied by the mosaic ground, consMiiig of one uniform pattern, on which the medallions are supposed to be placed; and at each side next to the border is a section of the prevailing medallion, or some other geometrical device. The ground is formed of crossing lines, or an imbricated or other design, or a running pattern of scroll-work or arabesque foliage. The pattern of crossing lines and the imbricated one being both very common in architecture, on the flat surfaces of walls, at this and at an earlier (Norman) period, they may have been * These last were also contemporary with the later medallion style ; and some good specimens of canopied glass windows, with single figures, are found in cathedrals of the same period, as in the apse and choir of Rbeims and others. (See that useful work, " Monographie de la Cathedrale de Borages," PL xvm. xxii. xxin. xxv.) Their effect was not then impaired by the opaque shadows and the heaviness of the canopies of a subsequent age, as in I*- steyrie, PI. L. of 1400 a.'d. and others. § 23. 27. GROUNDS OF THE WINDOWS. 39 adopted as belonging to the time, rather than for any merit as glass patterns beyond that of being easily adapted by their form to the purpose ; but the arabesque pattern (which was used in windows at the same period) was the result of greater feeling for graceful ornament. It is certainly preferable as a ground. This, indeed, is abundantly shown by the windows in the Sainte-Chapelle at Paris, erected by Louis IX. (1241-1244), which for form, variety, colour, and the com bination of the medallions and grounds, are conspicuous among the most splendid ones in France of that period. And while mentioning the beauty of that glass, I cannot but do justice to the talent of M. Luson, who has been employed to restore it; for the most fastidious and accurate eye is unable to distinguish between the original and modern parts of those brilliant windows. The coloured grounds are frequently composed of red lines on blue, with a yellow dot at their junction, or in the centre of the blue field ; or of arabesque scroll-work of red, yellow, and some little green, on a blue ground. The general rule respecting the ground is, that its pattern shall appear to be continuous, and (as I before stated) with the medallions placed upon it; not, as in some modern glass, with the ground broken up into separate spaces, each containing its own pattern, whereby a great quantity of the colour of the field is left plain around that pattern. This makes the window heavy, disturbs the distribution and harmony of the whole design, and is directly opposed to the true principle of mosaic glass-work. Another important point in the treat ment of grounds is to prevent their extending over too large a surface ; for wherever they occupy the greater portion of a window the proportion and the general effect of the whole composition are impaired. This too should be borne in mind, that neither in the grounds (when surrounding me dallions) nor in the figures, nor in other parts of a window, » 4 40 ON COLOUR. Past!. should there be any large space covered with one unbroken colour. At the same time the caleidoscope minuteness pro duced by putting together numerous small pieces of coloured .glass should be avoided, having a paltry and spotted appearance; and proclaiming poverty of invention, and im perfect knowledge of design. The want of sufficient space for the grounds is also a fault; and the juxtaposition of several medallions, or compartments of similar form, with little or no ground between them, is fatal to the effect of a window, being monotonous and tiresome to the eye; and some variety in the form, as well as in the contents, of several of the medallions, is more pleasing than the constant re petition of the same. The borders should be equally varied, as in the windows of the 1200, where they frequently have arabesque scrolls and other patterns, with a due quantity of blue, red, and yellow, and sometimes a little green, according to the design in the centre of the light, with which the border should always accord in motive and colour. In the medallions, while the primaries predominate, brown, purple, and orange, and some mixed colours are admitted; and round each of these is an edging of one or more colours, in order to frame it and separate it from the ground. This edging is often red, blue, or yellow, according to the colour required, with a rim of very light neutral colour, supposed to answer to white, but which is mostly of a greenish hue ; and the best windows have the least transparent, or translucid, white glass. When ever this is introduced in quantity, it spoils their appearance, causes them to look hard, and cuts out the medallions too harshly from the ground. It is still more objectionable when in contact with the lead lines, as it makes them too pro minent, and injures that effect which is produced by their judicious employment. 28. The use of much white glass, whether transparent or translucid, in a coloured window, is one of those fatal mis- § 28. OF WHITE TRANSLUCID GLASS. 41 takes which have found favour in modern times, and, as some few instances of it occur in old windows, it has been thought to have the sanction of good authority. But those few instances ought, on the contrary, to have shown its defor mity, and whether really original, or (as in some cases) restorations made at the time when much colourless glass came into fashion, they serve as beacons to be shunned. It is quite as necessary to know what to avoid, as what to imitate. For it should be laid down as a rule, that no glass should be white in a coloured glass window, except when absolutely required as part of the composition; and wherever a simple space, or edging, is to be introduced, without being of any positive hue, it should be of a neutral tint, like the subdued greenish hue of partially bleached glass. This neutral hue should also be rather deeper in windows on the south, and even on the east and west sides of a church, than on the north ; and additional depth may in like manner be given to all the colours of windows on the south, and also on the east and west, in consequence of the greater quantity of bright light and sunshine passing through them than through those on the north. When more warmth and richness of effect are required, the lighter borders may have a greater quantity of yellow ; provided always that too much yellow be not used, so as to exceed its due proportion to the blue and red ; and it is easy to perceive the marked difference that subsists between a window where transparent, or translucid, white glass is used in such borders, and where yellow is permitted to impart warmth to them ; the effect of the one abounding in white glass being poor and cold. Windows too in which figures or any coloured pattern are introduced upon a white, or even on a good diaper, ground have an insignificant character; they often appear as if made up of stray parts of some other composi tion, and are only excusable where much light is required. 42 ON COLOUR. Part I. 29. Another error, greatly to be condemned, is the confusion sometimes seen in blues and reds, which are made to appear purple when seen at a distance. It has been fatal to many of our modern windows, otherwise not devoid of merit. Among the causes of this are the want of a sufficient quantity of yellow, the improper arrangement of the reds and blues, and the absence of other colours required to combine with them. A yellow, or a white, fillet between the red and blue, or a spot of the same placed on the centre, or at the junction of the two, will obviate it ; though, as before shown, white has a poor cold effect, and yellow is to be preferred, both for its richness and for its completing the combination of the three primaries. But in all instances of coloured decoration the different hues should be so arranged in the general composition as to prevent an undue and disproportionate effect of any one colour. 30. It sometimes happens that the pattern is allowed to run from one light to another, half being on one and half on its neighbour ; and this is very allowable, provided the figv/res in a medallion, or in any other part of the same light, do not cross from it into the adjoining one, the mullion cutting them in half. It is often seen in windows of later periods, and particularly in those of the 1400, and the following century, when opaque stone mullions are allowed to pass through the body of a man, or otherwise painfully to divide and interfere. with the subject. The fault arose out of the attempt to make a large " paintvng'''' on glass, — an abuse which was suffered to creep in towards the end of the 1300, and which ended in producing all the defects of those grandiose windows so much admired in Belgium and elsewhere, and which have fatally interfered with the true principles of painted glass.* Like the splendid monstrosities of Louis XIV. and XV. in * As in PI. xcix. of Lasteyrie's " History of Glass-Painting," a window of the seventeenth century in the Chartreuse de Molsheim, and many others. § 20-31. CANOPY WINDOWS. 43 furniture and various ornamental works, they have imposed on innocent minds and warped the judgment of those who are more influenced by splendour and an ad captandum display than by good taste : and as the judgment is apt to be misled by what is specious and seductive, greater care is requisite in order to guard against its influence. 31. In the 1300 brilliant colours were given to glass, and its manufacture was excellent. At that period, instead of the mosaic patterns of the previous century, larger figures of saints under canopies occupying each a single light (already introduced in the previous century, particularly in the upper windows), came into more general use ; and though there is no objection to these figures, provided the masses of colour are not too great in some parts, the shadows not too heavy, the figures not too large, and the canopies not deeply shaded, nor of a different character from the building itself, they are far less pleasing than the medallion style. Nor can we forget that they are always likely to lead to the introduction of "pictures" on glass,- and the abandonment of the true principle of vitro- chrome decoration. Great masses of unbroken colour in the grounds and the draperies give a heaviness to the design ; and in consequence of the human figure being received as the standard of size, this, when larger thah life, disturbs propor tion, and when placed in the upper story deceives the eye by taking away from the apparent hejght of the building. It is true that, as in Northern Italy, there are many speci mens of single figures occupying the whole breadth of one light, sometimes in compartments one over the ojther in the same light, which are highly to be commended ; and as long as the conditions just specified are regarded, single figures may safely be introduced. But as those conditions are so often violated in this mode of decorating windows, and as their effect is generally inferior to that of the' mosaic pattern, the latter is to be preferred. It is difficult to avoid the tendency 44 ON COLOUR. Past I. towards making a "painting" on glass when single figures are so introduced; and as they did before, so they would probably again lead to a departure from the true princi ples of painted glass windows. We observe how in those days, after the latter part of the 1300, the window assumed step by step the .aspect and pretensions of a large picture uDtil at length in the 1500, whole windows consisting of several lights were covered by one continuous subject ; and massive yellow canopies, miscoloured baldacchvni,wA monstrous trans parent columns, with other architectural accessories, defied all harmony of colour, proportion, and possibility. The predo minance of yellow, of yellow-brown, and of transparent colour less glass, together with the substitution of the secondary and tertiary hues for the primaries, destroyed all harmony of colour ; and besides a constant repetition of discords, the scrolls and broken outlines in vogue at that period disfigured the designs, as the ponderous architectural ornaments of the Eenaissance period interfered with the character of the building itself. In the "Athenaeum" of June 16, 1855, in a review of Mr. Oliphant's useful book on glass-painting, are some just remarks respecting the windows of different periods ; and in the glass of the Perpendicular time the colour is described as " blanched, hectic, sickly, and unwholesome." "The paintings are too highly finished, and painted without reference to their position ; " and " in 1450, when the Perpendicular had seen its best, in spite of Ulm, Munich, Cologne, and Eouen, glass- painting lost its harmony of purpose and integrity of design. The cinque^cento brought with it huge colonnades, triumphal arches, cupids, and all the refurbished lumber of a galvanised paganism. The present ruin of glass-painting, is that some artists merely imitate old unapproachable examples, while others foolishly try to execute oil painting with a material limited in its nature and requiring conventional treatment. Mr. Oliphant says, to remedy these evils no customer should § 32. PAINTING ON GLASS. 45 purchase windows on which the paintings are not well drawn and composed, harmonious in colour, with low and well discrimi nated relief, that should not destroy the flatness of the surface." 32. At the period of the Eenaissance, glass-painting had brought in a style which was at variancewith the very principles on which it had been based. It had then assumed the right of representing "paintings;" and going out of its province it presumed to take the place of panel, of canvas, and of the fresco wall. It mistook its powers ; and, after all, the painted glass window only became a transparent blind. No greater mis take can be imagined than the attempt to make a large picture on a translucid material. Our faces, our landscapes, and our buildings, are not translucid ; and glass cannot give aerial per spective, which is a necessary condition in such a work. The province and object of a glass window in a church are not to present a copy from nature, but to be simply a portion of the general decoration. However well the imitation of a large "painting" may be made on glass, it is at best not a picture, but the imitation of one, as any other conventional substitute may be. We are sometimes surprised at the ingenuity dis played in making a picture of pieces of coloured cloth or paper, or by some other clever deception : we wonder at, and applaud, the resemblance ; but we are not expected to look on it as a "painting," and if this were asked of us we should maintain that, however ingenious, it had failed to fulfil its conditions, or attain to the high level to which it aspired. The colours may be most splendid ; they may impart to cos tumes, jewellery, and fancy ornaments the most brilliant effect; and the composition of the subject may be faultless ; still the translucid glass window will only merit admiration as painted glass ; and I cannot subscribe to the opinion that any painter of eminence, " on witnessing the effect produced by the richness and brilliancy " of those " of the 15th century " at Florence or elsewhere, "when the sun shone through them, would be 46 ON COLOUR. PaeiI, tempted to throw away oils in despair." This admiration of a false principle has unfortunately become too prevalent with some persons at the present day, and we are therefore fre quently horrified by some large " painting " on glass in our London churches, made worse by discords of colour, and by being contrasted with a whitewashed wall ; the whole window too cut into squares by monotonous parallel and, cross lines passing over the figures and their drapery, having the aspect of a prison or a cage, with a badly coloured landscape in the background. 33. When in the 1200 the medallion was placed on the co loured ground, it was not as an independent picture; but as a portion of the ornamentation of the window, and was conven tional. It was subservient to, and part of, the general effect, and was not there for itself, but for the whole subject of which it was an accessory. It is on this same principle that we tolerate small figures of cupids, animals, chimeras,„and other conceits in an arabesque scroll pattern; they are not intended to be representations of such objects, but are only part of the orna mental pattern; and we look upon them simply as conventional. Labarte (in his admirable "Handbook of the Arts of the Middle Ages"*) makes these very just remarks: "The chief merit of the windows of the xii. and xiii. centuries, ... is their perfect harmony with the general effect of the edifices to which they belong In the middle of the xv. century the revo lution in the art of painting upon glass was complete. .... Thenceforth glass was nothing more than the material sub servient to the painter, as canvas or wood in oil painting. Glass-painters went so far as to copy upon white glass, as upon canvas, the master-pieces of Eaffaelle, Michael Angelo, and the other great painters of the Italian Eenaissance. ... We also find entire windows painted in mono-chromatic tints But the era of glass-painting was at an end. From the * Pages 70, 75, 76. §33,84. DESIGNS ON GLASS. 47 moment that it was attempted to transform an art of purely monumental decoration into an art of expression, its intention was perverted, and this led of necessity to its ruin." 34. The object in a coloured glass window is to obtain an effect from its appearance as a whole, when seen at some dis tance, not to derive its merit from the beauty of its figures ; but still the figures, wherever they are introduced, should be good, and bear inspection on a near approach. For when, at -the present day, the practice of introducing them in medallions, or elsewhere, is adopted in our windows, we are not bound to imitate the faulty drawing or the inelegance of the figures of an early period. Had the designers of those days been able to draw them well, they would have done so ; incapacity, not choice, compelled them to make them faulty and rude, and we are not, therefore, bound to copy them in this particular. But we need not introduce modern or inappropriate costumes; we should rather maintain the early character of the subjects and draperies of the figures, while we abstain from making the temple at Jerusalem, the palace of Pharaoh, or the cities of Canaan, Greek or Eoman ; and Joshua, or other ancient military personages, need not be in armour of mediaeval times. It is not necessary to have any anachronism either in archi tecture or in costume. But in the conventional colouring of these ornamental designs we may follow the old glass- painters. They understood the art, and they very properly suited the colours to the general effect of their windows, which at once shows they considered them not "pictures" or real representations of nature, but simply ornamental. They used a blue, a red, or any other colour, according as it was wanted; and the Prodigal Son is seen feeding yellow, red, green, and blue boars, according to the require ments of the coloured design. Eespecting the excellence of the figures, Mr. Whinston says, " if glass-paintings, whose drawing so much resembles the antique, completely 48 ON COLOUR. Part i. harmonise with the buildings of the 12th and 13th centuries, would not other glass paintings equally harmonise with such buildings, whose drawing should more exactly resemble the antique in point of excellence ? I say in point of excellence, for I totally disclaim any intention of recommending the sub stitution of copies of classical draperies or ornaments for mediaeval ones, or exchanging the individual character and strictly human as opposed to God-like expression of the coun tenance which distinguish Christian art for the more gene ralised and conventional treatment of the antique. I wish to see the Christian sentiment elevated, but not obliterated, by a study of the antique, and the mediaeval drapery drawn as the mediaeval artist would have drawn it had he possessed the power of the Greek." We are satisfied in most cases to copy an old style of architecture, because it is difficult to invent a new one of equal beauty, and if a new style is to be intro duced this can only be done by degrees; so too we maybe guided by the taste of a good period in glass, though it is not necessary to imitate all its imperfections, as well as its beauties. 35. In a work entitled " Hints on Glass-Painting,"* are some judicious remarks on "the true principles of glass-painting;" and though I cannot agree with the author in the preference he gives to glass of cinque-cento time, with its "picture or scene represented under a canopy or bower, or beneath an archway," I subscribe to his opinion When he says, "The capabilities of some kinds of painting are greater than those of others; but whichever ah artist has occasion to adopt, it is evident that his efforts should be confined to a skilful appli cation of the means it places at his disposal. He should endeavour to develop its resources to the fullest extent, but he ought not to seek excellencies which are incompatible with its inherent properties. Failure must necessarily result from an attempt to produce, in one mode, effects which are only * " By an Amateur," ch. ii. sect. 2, p. 238. §35- PRINCIPLES OF GLASS PAINTING. 49 attainable in another." And for this very reason it is incon sistent to attempt to make a picture on a material which, while it is suitable for ornamentation, cannot assume the place of panel or canvas. Indeed the maxim I here uphold is quite in accordance with what he afterwards says, that " the artist who undertakes to practice glass painting should bear in mind he is dealing with a material essentially different from any with which he has hitherto been familiar." . . . " The chief excellency of a glass painting is its translucency. A glass painting, by possessing the power of transmitting light in a far greater degree than any other species of painting, is able to display effects of light and colour with a brilliancy and vividness quite unapproachable by any other means. On the other hand, this same diaphanous quality is the source of certain defects, such as the limited scale of colour and of transparent shadow observable in a glass painting,. of which its inherent flatness is a necessary result. These peculiarities will be found to restrict the successful application of glass painting to a particular class of subjects." "Another peculiarity of a glass painting, which has the same tendency, is its mechanical composition. Lead-work and saddlebars . . . are essentially necessary for the support of the glass ; . . . and in whatever manner it may be arranged " the metal-work "causes the picture to be traversed by a number of black lines." "These remarkable features of a glass painting, then, render it unfit for the representation of certain subjects. Such as essentially demand a picturesque treatment are better suited to an oil or water-colour painting than to a glass paint ing, the pictorial resources of which are more limited. A glass painting is incapable of those nice gradations of colour, and of light and shade, which are indispensable for close imitations of nature, and for producing the full effect of atmosphere and 50 ON COLOUR. Past I. distance. And even if this defect could be overcome, the lead," or other metal-work would infallibly ruin the picture. For these reasons it would be improper to select a landscape, for instance, as the principal subject of a glass painting. A subject of this description, though it might form a valu able auxiliary as a background to a design, would, if ex ecuted by itself, only betray the defectiveness of the art in its flatness and want of atmosphere. The same objection equally applies to long perspective views of interiors, and the like. To these may be added groups of figures, or even single figures, requiring a great display of foreshortening : and compositions which do not simply consist of figures confined to the fore ground, but comprise distant groups carried far into the back ground of the picture. " The subjects which appear best suited to glass paintings are those which, when executed, are of 'themselves pleasing objects, and are favourable to a display of the translucent qualities of the glass. Of this kind are ornamental patterns, and a variety of other designs capable of being properly repre sented in a simple, hard, and somewhat flat manner ; by broad masses of stiff colouring, hard outlines, and vivid contrasts of light and shade." I cannot, however, agree with him, that a subject like " The Eaising of Lazarus, by Sebastiano del Piombo, in the National Gallery, would form, with a little modification, a good design for a glass painting ;" but rather coincide with him in this opinion, that, " in order to render available the translucent quality of glass to the utmost extent under every conjuncture, the artist should adopt the mosaic system of glass painting; because, under this system, the most brilliant and powerful effects of light and colour can be produced. . . . Whether it is white or coloured, it is equally transparent; . . . hence, caeteris paribus, a mosaic glass painting, the whole of whose basis is equally transparent, must be more diaphanous § 35. MOSAIC GLASS. 51 than an enamel, or mosaic enamel glass painting ; the ground work of which is of different degrees of transparency. . . . " It may be said that the mosaic system does not possess so extended a scale of colour as the enamel system ;" . . . but this inferiority " is more than counterbalanced by its superiority over the enamel in strength of colour and ... in point of bril liancy." It may " be urged as an objection against the mosaic system of glass painting, that the employment of a separate piece of glass for almost every colour of the design renders the use of harsh outlines throughout the picture unavoidable, and, consequently, that it is less favourable than the enamel system for pictures. But this objection does not appear to be well founded. It has been stated that no glass painting, unless it be of very small dimensions, can be constructed without the aid of metal-work, and that wherever metal-work is used'there will be the appearance of black lines. To this law an enamel glass painting affords no exception : if of huge dimensions it must be composed of many pieces of glass, and these must be secured in their places either simply by means of leads, or in a metal framework. The construction of the work does not indeed require that the leads or metal frame work should follow the course of the outlines of the picture ; but this is practically the only difference between an enamel and a mosaic glass painting. The black lines cannot be got rid of." . . . "The construction of a mosaic glass painting appears indeed to be, on the whole, more favourable to the effect of the picture than that of an enamel glass painting. For the lead-work, being generally and pretty equally diffused over the whole design, is on that account less noticed than if its course were confined only to a few particular outlines. I may also add that the colouring and execution of a mosaic glass painting greatly tend to disguise the lead-work." . . . " I think I am justified in concluding, that the mosaic system E 2 52 ON COLOUR. Pakt I. Of glass painting is, on the whole, the best system to be adopted."— (pp. 245 and 268.) By the "mosaic system" I suppose he alludes to that which was in vogue during the 1200, when the patterns were combined with medallions, as at the Sainte-Chapelle, at Auxerre, Chartres, Bourges, Sens, and other cathedrals; as he says they were " employed in this country from the earliest period at which painted glass is found ;" and as he notices " French medallion windows of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries." — (pp. 33, 34.) These, he very properly observes, were "undoubtedly the most interesting" of the "three principal classes of coloured windows in this (the early English) style" — the "medallion, the figure and canopy, and the Jesse windows ; " and with this preference for the medallion windows I fully concur. For the medallions, them selves ' one of the conditions is, that the drawing and "compo sition of the figures should be good, even though subject in their colour to conventional rules. But we must not have large pictures on glass, as they sin against the very principle of this kind of ornamentation, and assume a place to which they have no claim. 36. I should extend the subject too far if I were to enter into the question of the form and proportion of windows and their arrangement; or attempt to show how some, even in France and elsewhere, fail to fulfil the proper conditions of vitrochrome decoration, especially during the 1400 and 1500 (without coming down to more debased times); I cannot, however, omit to mention the error in several circular windows, of making its lights, or the patterns on them, concen tric instead of radiating from the centre ; nor can any excuse be found for placing a disproportionately large rosette in the upper part of a window over a series of short upright lights, such as are seen in the north transept of Sens Cathedral. Nor is that of the south transept much less faulty in propor- § 36. SPECIMENS OF MOSAIC GLASS. 53 tion. They are both of the Flamboyant style. I may also notice some good and some faulty specimens given in those two grand works,— -"Monographiede laCathedrale deBourges," — and Lasteyrie's "History of Glass." Of the former, I may cite the medallion windows in PL iv. vi. vn. xn. xrv., as well as Etude xi. fig. 4, from Sens, giving the History of the Prodigal Son ; though in this the colours are not all quite accurately copied.* PI. x. gives another specimen of medallion glass, but in that plate it has a heavier appearance than in the original ; I may also mention PI. xii. and xiii. and others ; and in- the mosaic borders are some good combinations of form and colour, especially in those marked 8, 4, of Cologne, Mans, Troyes, Angers, Chalons, St. Denis, and Lyon. In the mosaic grounds marked " Mosaiques," PI. E, fig. 2 is far too green, as are 6 and 8, which have a disagreeable effect. In the PL G they are very faulty, and are of later date, from Strasburg and Friburg; but in PL K they are of a better style. In PL n. they are also good ; but in the "Mosaiques," PL F, from Soissons, &c, the medallions with mere patterns and without figures are very objectionable. In Lasteyrie, PL in. and iv. are the old windows of St. Denis, which are very interesting from being the earliest known speci mens of figures in medallions, and present an instance of the arrangement of the red lines crossing a blue ground with a yellow dot at their junction. The three upper medallions of each window, having patterns instead of figures, appear to be of a different date. In PL xvi. is another medallion window, from Tours, " of the xinth century," of good design ; and in PL xxrx. is another early medallion window from the Sainte- Chapelle, but this has a fault in the want of variety in the forms of the medallions, and the recurrence of the same * The scene represents the feeding of the pigs, &c. ; and the Colours in these plates are generally wanting in richness compared with those on the glass. e 3 54 ON COLOUR. Paet i; circles throughout the four lights is tiresome to the eye. Nor is the distribution of the small pictures in regular squares or panes, in another window (PL liv. of 1461 A.D.), an agree able one ; for though the colour is good, and each compart ment has its own subject, the want of variety in the forms gives it a monotonous effect. PL lxiv. is an instance of faulty arrangement as well as of bad colour, the subject being the Garden of Eden continuing acrossthe six lights; and PL lxx., a scene from the Apocalypse, is offensive both in colour and arrangement. In another work, "Vitreaux de la Cathe- drale de Tournai," are some glass windows of merit, but though good in design and colour for that particular style and period, they have the fault of being pictures upon glass, and of having the subjects interfered with by the construction of the. window. This is the usual objection to the best specimens met with in the Netherlands; and when, as at Brussels and elsewhere, they add faulty colouring and ponderous designs, they are still more opposed to the true principles of the painted glass window. 37. Among the many conditions of coloured glass windows I may notice the following : that they should be subservient to the general ornamentation, their object being decorative; they should assimilate to, and aid, the decoration and style of the building; they should not be a contrast to a white wall ; nor pretend to be a painting or large picture ; the small figures in the medallions, though conventional, should be good, not imitations of a rude style, and should be part of the coloured effect of the window when seen at a distance : broad opaque shadows should not be introduced, nor an attempt be made to convert the flat into a round style: figures larger than life should be avoided as injurious to the proportion of a building : no great expanse of one colour in one place should catch the eye ; and a picture extending over two or more lights, cut by an opaque mullion, is incon- § 37-39. CONCORD OF COLOURS. 55 sistent and offensive. A quantity of white glass is bad and poor, and yellow is better than white for preventing red and blue from appearing purple at a distance. The border should be in proportion to the size of the light ; too small, and even too large a quantity of ground between medallions should be avoided ; the medallions should not be all of the same form, and the patterns should not be too small, nor have a spotted appearance as in a caleidoscope ; the primary colours should predominate over the secondary and tertiary; and the best windows for imitation are those of the 1200. In rosette windows, the tracery lights, or openings, should radiate from the centre, rather than be concentric But coloured glass is not required in buildings of the Eenaissance style. 38. I have shown that in former times, England was neither prejudiced against the employment of colour, nor was defi cient in the due appreciation of it. She was then fully persuaded of its importance as an ornamental accessory (even in architecture) ; and now that the same conviction is gain ing ground, it is most important that the subject should be properly understood, and that We should seek the same result from the employment of colour which has been at tained in those countries where it has been practised with the greatest success. This is to be done by careful observa tion, by the education of the eye, and by studying those examples of good combinations which may serve to form our taste ; and it is only when experience has thus been acquired that rules can be laid down for combining colours consist ently with true harmony. The same facilities may then be afforded for obtaining harmony of colour, which rules in'music afford for producing the harmony of sounds. 39. The perception of the concord of colours, as of sounds, is to some persons a natural gift ; and those who possess it can no more help perceiving at first sight whether their arrange ment forms a concord or a discord, than they can help dis- F i 56 ON COLOUR. Part I. tinguishing red from green, which those whose perception of colour is imperfect cannot do. To give an eye for colour is no more possible, as I have before said, than to give an ear for sound ; and though both may be improved by study, if possessed, so both may be impaired by bad habit. No effort will create a natural gift, as no rules will correct' the defective vision called "colour-blindness," which confounds a colour with its accidental one. And so common is this defect in England *, that one man in every seven hundred and fifty is said to be colour-blind, *. e. unable to distinguish a certain colour from another, as red from green. And the fact of these two being so often confounded, makes the custom of having red and green lights for opposite signals on board our steamers and on railway lines reprehensible and dangerous. For by those who have defective vision no two colours are so generally confounded as red and green, and to such a degree that a soldier's red coat and the grass of a field, and strawberries (or cherries) and their leaves, appear to them to be of the same colour. Nor is it always the accidental that is mistaken for its complementary colour : some confound orange with grass- green, and yellow with light-green ; and others see " indigo and Prussian blue as black," and pink as pale blue. But black and white, which are accidental to each other, are not confounded, f * Women are supposed to have this defect in a minor degree than men. I f I" *he Proceedings of the Royal Society, vol. viiu p. 172, Mr. Pole refers | to Dr. "Wilson of Edinburgh, who says there are three kinds of colour-blindness. " 1. Inability to discern any colour but black and "white. This is very rare. 2. Inability to discriminate between the nice distinctions of colour, so common as to be apparently rather the rule than the exception. 3. Inability to dis tinguish between any of the colours most marked to normal eyes, and its most complete form is what is called dichromic vision, being total blindness to one of the three primary colours. In this last, according to the symptoms exhibited in different cases : 1st, blue and yellow are perfectly distinguished : 2nd, almost all colour-blind persons think they see red, but it is frequently confounded with green (the most common mistake), black, orange, yellow, brown, blue, and §4,0. PERCEPTION OF COLOUR. 57 Defects like these cannot be overcome either by study or by rules. But though study and the contemplation of good examples will not remedy such defects, nor give at once a true perception of the harmony of colours even to those whose vision is not defective, still they are very necessary for their instruction, as they might otherwise continue to be unable to distinguish between a concord and a discord, from the want of that natural gift. Again, those who do possess that natural perception may not always be able to combine colours, though they may readily perceive whether colours are or are not harmoniously united in a composition ; as any one with an ear for sound may detect false notes without being able himself to arrange any in an air. But the first and indispensable condition in furnishing examples, or rules, is that the subject should be thoroughly understood ; and the required knowledge can only be derived from a natural per ception of the harmony of colours improved and matured by observation. 40. In examining into the effect of colours, we have to in quire what it is when presented to the eye, not what it ought to be according to this or that theory ; and nothing will be understood on the subject unless the eye is first allowed to be the judge. It is the perceptive faculty which is to be appealed to, and we must begin by ascertaining certain facts violet ; crimson and pink appear to have no relation to scarlet : 3rd, green is a most perplexing colour, it is not only confounded with red, but with black, white, or grey, orange, yellow, blue, violet, and brown: 4th, violet is con founded with blue and grey, and orange with yellow : 5th, more difficulty is manifested with light or dark tones of compound colours than with full ones." It is certainly remarkable that while blue and yellow are seen perfectly well, their effect should be so different when combined together as green; and this is explained by the white of the colour-blind person being green, one of the three elements (red) being wanting to him, and he having only blue and yellow to produce his white. Green is therefore no colour to the colour-blind. He has only two sensations of colour, blue and yellow. Red and green are then, both, shades of yellow. 58 ON COLOUR. Pam I. as to the colours that suit each other ; leaving the reason why they do so to a future occasion, when we have mastered the facts. It matters little for the harmonious combination of colours why blue and yellow form green, we want to ascertain how various tones of green accord with other hues; and when we have determined the proper combination of these and other colours we may speculate on their natures, or on the reasons, at our leisure. It is this endeavour to explain some irrelevant question, and the desire to build a theory on certain remarkable properties that have appeared during the inquiry, which have led to the unfortunate blunders about accidental colours and their necessary harmony, whereby many who have no eye for colour have been persuaded to adopt the most disagreeable discords as harmonious concords. The argument has simply been that they must agree, because they ought to do so. 41. But while I express a disapprobation of certain theories, I must repeat my disclaimer of an intention to offer any of my own; and if I object to any other opinion, it is not from a desire to find fault, but from a sincere wish to see our taste improved, and to second the efforts made to promote it which reflect so much credit on their authors ; and judging from their results and the improvement now taking place we may feel convinced that by proper instruction and encouragement the English are capable of producing works of merit in ornar mental design as in every branch of art. I do not pretend to lay down rules for colour or dogmatise in any matters con nected with taste ; I merely seek to direct attention to those subjects, and to urge that nothing should be done without a purpose and a thorough understanding of the means of ob taining success. I do not presume to teach or dictate, but rather recommend inquiry : that every thing may be done with a reason, and every opinion be the result of thought. The habit of thinking for ourselves, particularly in matters § 41—43. BALANCE OF COLOUR. 59 of taste, is a great desideratum ; and it is refreshing to hear an original remark from those who, in looking at objects of art, express their opinion without reference to some hackneyed one daily repeated without inquiry or conviction. Even if wrong, it may have its use ; and at all events the original thinker will occasionally suggest a valuable idea, which is not to be obtained from one who is satisfied with a borrowed criticism. Instances of this might be cited in the opinions of some who, though biassed in their views, and seeing excellence only in a particular style, yet do, from their origi nality of thought, offer many most valuable suggestions. 42. In the combination of colours there are some which, being contrasts, set off each other, and materially heighten their effect ; while others, again, decrease it. In both cases their effect depends greatly on their relative proportions ; and such is the influence of proportion, that colours which suit each other in one instance will sometimes have a disagreeable effect in another, where the quantity, or even the tone of one is too great or too little for that of its neighbour. And a similarly inharmonious character will be given to a whole carpet, or other coloured object, when the hues which compose its design offend against those conditions. This balance of colour must always be attended to ; for it is on this, as well as on the suitable juxtaposition of colours that harmony depends. 43. The first step in studying the harmony of colours, is certainly to ascertain what two, or more, when placed together are concords or discords. But this is not all that has to be determined. The quantity of each must also be regulated, as well as their proper position ; and the same set of colours put together in different proportions and positions will have a different appearance. Colours also borrow from each other, and thus mutually change their effect ; while others heighten each other's power by contrast; and others soften, or diminish 60 ON COLOUR. Paet I. it. Thus blue and red have a very different action on each other from green and red; as these last have from blue and -orange ; though in the two last cases the colours green and red, and blue and orange, are accidental to each other. Blue and orange, which are accidental colours, are a harmo nious contrast; but red and green, or yellow and purple, are not necessarily so because they are also accidental colours. (See Sect. VI.) We must therefore understand which colours agree by contrast, which by analogy, and which tend to diminish, or otherwise alter each other's effect ; for some of these are apt to be confounded, and a very fallacious doctrine has been pro pounded — that the union of one of the primaries with its acci dental colour is analogous in effect to that of the same primary with its two companions ; as, for instance, that red with green has the same effect as red with blue and yellow. It is true that white light consists of all the three, and it is not till it has been decomposed that they are distinctly and separately presented to the eye ; but in looking at white light we do not distinguish the red, blue, and yellow ; otherwise, a white glass window might pretend to the possession of the three colours. No one, however, will allow his fancy to go so far as to imagine that in white he sees the three primary hues ; and yet it is not more inconsistent than to consider green, the same as blue and yellow, or to say, as some have, that when green is put with red we then have the three primary colours — we have in reality one primary and one secondary; and to show the difference of the effect of two colours when used singly and when united as a compound or secondary, we need merely place red and yelloW with green, and orange with green ; the former an imperfect, the latter a very harmonious, combination. (See Sect. XVIH.) It is to the eye that the' several colours must distinctly appear. It is not enough to know that theoretically they are all there ; and green is not only to the eye a new colour, § 44. HOW COLOURS AFFECT EACH OTHER. 61 quite distinct from blue and yellow, but has a very different effect in combination with other colours from that produced by blue and yellow. Such a theory might obtain for the mono-chrome taste of churchwardens the credit of using all the primaries in the whitened walls for which our churches are so remarkable ; but our sensations tell us the monotonous truth. 44. The great point in ornamenting with colours is to keep them distinct; and to seek effect, not confusion, from their combinations ; and the necessity of enabling the eye to see the colours separately and distinctly may be illustrated by placing red, blue, and green" together, when the- red and blue in juxtaposition have the appearance of purple, which is a discord with green ; whereas, if a yellow fillet had been inter posed between those two colours they would have been kept distinct, and what has become a discord would have been a harmonious combination. When the red and blue are in small quantities, as, for instance, in narrow lines, the purple effect becomes more evident, particularly when viewed from a distance; and we not unfrequently see instances of it in our modern stained glass windows. But though red and blue in juxtaposition have the appearance of purple, and yellow placed next to red gives it an orange hue, the same" illusion is not caused by the contact of the other two primary colours, blue and yellow ; and these do not look green when in juxta position, except in certain cases. Nor is the change then so marked, as when blue andred, or yellow and red, are in con tact. And this is one of many proofs that all the three primary colours are not under the same conditions in relation to each other. It is not, therefore, necessary to lay down the same general and invariable rule respecting the three primaries : that " in making new patterns or ornaments, red and blue should not join, nor yellow and red, nor yellow and blue," as though the three combinations were exactly 62 ON COLOUR. Paet I. similar, and subject to the same laws. For yellow and blue do not deceive the eye to the same extent as the others, when in juxtaposition. Nor has red with green the same effect as red with blue and yellow ; and still less have red blue and yellow the same effect as these three colours when united in one. A difference will also be caused by the relative quahties of the two colours, as well as by the presence of others ; and yellow placed between red and blue (in juxtaposition, therefore, with both of them) is not only agreeable, but is necessary, as before stated, for keeping them distinct, and completes the harmony of the three primaries. The difference of effect produced by green and blue with red is well known to those who have fire-coloured hair; and experience teaches them that green softens the force of red. Blue, on the contrary, being a constrast to red (particularly to scarlet and fire-red, as well as to orange) sets it off; and women with red hair are justified in their habit of diminishing its intensity by the other more suitable colour. In ornamen tation this is not our object. We want to show, not to hide, the colours. We wish to brighten, not to diminish, their effect. Great quantities of green, therefore, deaden the reds of a carpet or a wall, by depriving them of their full effect, and by interfering with the balance of colour on which har mony so much depends ; since by taking away from the reds some of their due power, these no longer bear the same pro portion to the other colours in the design. The same applies to all colours which have a reciprocal effect on each other. Whatever diminishes their effect is contrary to the spirit of ornamentation; it disturbs and even alters altogether the relative powers of the various colours. ' For , a colour so affected ceases to be the same it really is. Thus a black next to a red, or to a green, or between two of these, ceases to appear really black ; it becomes of a dull, or a russet, hue ; and §45. CONTRAST AND OTHER EFFECTS. 63 the red and green each lose part of their own colour and effect. Introduce a white or a yellow next to the black, and this last regains at once its own hue ; it is once more really black by the assistance of the reviving contrast ; but if its legitimate effect be taken away, it has no longer the power of maintaining the place it ought to have in preserving the balance of colour with its surrounding companions. The differences between a neutralising* effect, harmony by con trast, and other harmonious unions of colours, are suffi ciently obvious; and nothing shows them better than the juxtaposition of such colours as black and red, or black and green, which really do neutralise each other, or lessen each other's effect; and that of black and white, which contrast with and set off each other ; and that of blue, red, and yellow, which harmonise with, and set off, but do not neutralise, each other. It is precisely this neutralising power of a colour, when in juxtaposition with some particular one, which requires it to be used in such a manner as not to inter fere with its neighbour ; and some, as greens, when they are to be seen by daylight should be employed sparingly, and with great judgment. This too may be observed of green, that a certain quantity of it appears to be greater than the same quantity of most other colours. The most valuable office of the brilliancy of green is to give brightness to a design ; and when only introduced in such a manner as not to diminish the power of red, it is most effective. But this and other remarks on the application of colours will be noticed in the sequel. 45. Much has been written on the scientific phenomena of colours, which present many most interesting facts ; but they have no direct bearing on the employment of colours for ornamental purposes, and the attempts to draw conclusions from them for our guidance in the harmonious adaptation of * " Neutralising " has, perhaps, been used sometimes instead of " balancing." 64 ON COLOUR. Paet I. colour only tend to mislead. For the present we only want the results of actual observation and a knowledge of the proper combinations of colour derived from the experience of those who possess the true perception of it ; and, as I cannot too often assert, it is the eye which is to be consulted as the proper judge of what it sees. 46. But before entering into the question of the combination of colours, it will be necessary to classify them, and to deter mine the application of some at least of the terms used in distinguishing them. The primary colours are three : blue, red, and yellow ; and not all those of the prism, or the rainbow, which some have denominated "primitive colours," including the intermediate derivative colours, purple, orange, and green. Colours then may be classified in this order : A. Primaries (Simple colours) : blue, red, and yellow. B. Secondaries (Compound colours) : purple (composed of blue and red); orange (composed of red and yellow); and green (com posed of blue and yellow). C. Tertiaries (Mixed colours): russet (composed of purple and orange) ; citrine (composed of orange and green) ; and olive (com posed of green and purple). D. (Irregular colours): browns, greys, neutral tints, drabs, stone- colour, &C. E. (Extreme colours) : black and white. / i Mr. Field, in his admirable work on this subject, gives the i proportions of these colours, according to the scale of his chromatic equivalents: as "I. 3 yellow, 5 red, and 8 blue = 16 ; II. 8 orange, 13 purple, 11 green =32 ; III. 19 Citrine, 21 russet, 24 olive = 64;" and consequently "red 5 is equi valent to green 11, yellow 3 to 13 purple, and blue 8 to 8 orange." Newton, as I have before stated (pp. 5, 10) ,gives the § 46. NOMENCLATURE OF COLOURS. _ 65 proportions of the colours of the rainbow — supposing the whole to form 100 — red 11, orange 8, yellow 14, green 17, blue 17, indigo (or purple) 11, violet 22. This last division I shall consider in noticing the secondary colours. A. The first division of the three primaries is the most simple and intelligible, though still it is necessary to deter mine exactly what are blue, red, and yellow, since each colour is composed of different hues and tones ; and the mere name of a colour is otherwise indefinite. By blue should properly be understood (as by the other two) that colour which appears in the prism, when light is decomposed by it ; but it is necessary to describe these and other colours, as the names of most of them are very con ventional. Blue may be considered equivalent to that of the deepest coloured sky (or to lapis lazuli, or a French blue) ; not what we call sky blue, but the colour of the sky in those southern climates where the atmosphere is clear, and where it appears to the eye an intense bright blue. What it is in an ex ceptional case, when the atmosphere is foggy, it is unimportant to consider ; nor is it necessary to examine the question of the sky being really white ; nor even to inquire into the reason of its blueness from the reflection of the blue ray, which takes place so readily in meeting with a medium of a different density ; nor why some shadows are blue instead of black. These have no bearing on arrangement of colours, nor even on their nomenclature ; and the decomposition of light, and various optical phenomena, interesting as they are, have no connexion with the question now before us. It is not always easy to determine what the exact tone or even hue is, when we mention some colours ; and it is there fore necessary to agree as to our meaning when speaking of any one. a. The blue of the sky, then, is the one to which the name blue most properly applies. It was evidently that F 66 ON COLOUR. Paet I, adopted by all southern people, and in looking through a broken part of the coloured ceiling of an Egyptian temple you perceive, where the colour has been well preserved, very httle difference between it and the sky. With regard to the colours we use, lapis lazuli, or French blue, may be said most pro perly to represent blue ; and the former has the advantage, as Mr. Field has shown, of being more durable than cobalt blue, which tends to greenness, though it has the power of resisting the sun for a long time. b. Bed is not so easily defined. It has been called the colour of the ruby, of the carbuncle, of blood, of the red- currant, or of a red-ochre, all which are somewhat dissimilar. The particular hue may therefore be taken either from that most generally used in olden times for ornamental purposes, or from that of the rainbow. It will suffice that it be one of the known reds, and provided we fix on the exact hue we mean, whenever it is mentioned no mistake can occur. Those which are generally called red appear to have too great an approach to a crimson ; and without pretending to decide whether the colour of the carbuncle or any of the above has the best claim to be considered a true red, I would suggest that the colour of the original Verbena Melm- dris is one of the purest types. When the primaries blue, red, and yellow are combined, they produce a perfect concord; but when the yellow is wanting, scarlet accords far better than red with blue; and they do not assume the same false purple hue by their juxta position, owing to the yellow in the scarlet. When, therefore, blue and red are the only two colours placed together, the latter should give place to scarlet, which too is almost always preferable to pure red for ornamentation. But when blue, red, and yellow are in juxtaposition, red, or rather crimson has a very rich and satisfactory effect. c. Yellow has been represented by "gamboge moistened fpli § 46. PRIMARIES AND SECONDARIES. , 67 with water : " but the particular hue of yellow, blue, red, crimson, and scarlet, and some other colours, implied whenever I mention them, may be seen in Plate in. fig.. 5. Yellow, Mr. Field remarks, " is less diminished than all other colours, except white, by distance," and has a great power of reflecting light. It displays itself very evidently in all the varieties of bright green and orange; and the hues of canary, lemon, buff, drab, chesnut, and various light browns, tawny, hazel, and others, are chiefly indebted to it for their composition as well as for their brightness. To this first class, some have added black and white ; ex tending the number of the primaries to five ; but their not being among those of the prism may exclude them from a ace both in the first and second class. Mengs observes, that " colours properly speaking, are but three," yet " as we cannot do without black and white," he adds these to the primary colours, and extends the number to five ; and Leonardo da Vinci says, " the first of all simple colours is white, though philosophers will not acknowledge white and black to be colours, because the first is the cause and receiver of colours, the other totally deprived of them. But as painters. cannot do without either, we shall place them among the others : and according to this order of things, white will be the first, yellow the second, green the third, blue the fourth, red the fifth, and black the sixth." It is, however, inconsistent to admit green, and exclude purple and orange ; and Mayer and others are right in limiting the number of primaries to three : blue, red, and yellow. B. The secondaries are compounds of any two of the three primaries ; of blue and red ; of yellow and red ; or of yellow and blue : making purple, orange, and green. But it is not easy to define their exact hues unless we limit them to the product of equal parts of two primaries ; and for these, I must again refer to Plate in. fig. 5, and to Sect. XIX. ; which F 2 68 ON COLOUR. Pam I. will show the character I ascribe to each. All we require is that it should be fixed ; and I shall have occasion to notice the names applied to them, in mentioning "Werner's Nomen clature of Colours." (See below, p. 91.) There is, indeed, great uncertainty respecting the exact complexion of most colours in other languages as well as in our own. What, for instance, can be more indefinite than the name of purple, the tones of which vary according as they contain more red or more blue ? What again do we under stand by the name " violet colour ? " Some consider it to be composed of equal parts of one kind of red and blue ; others, to be that of the violet flower, though the name is as indefinite as the colour of the flower itself; all which tends to show how necessary it is to define the nature of each colour, and of the hue of which we speak ; and how uncertain must be the im pression conveyed by the name of any one, unless we determine the sense in which we use it. Again, in other purples, the porphyry has more red, the lilac more blue ; and we must dis tinguish the various sub-tones as well as tones, by qualifying them as red-lilacs or blue-lilacs ; red-violets or blue-violets, &c, as by other specifications of their different intensities. Of the imperial purple I shall speak presently. Similar gradations exist in orange and in green; according to the greater proportion of red and yellow in the former, and of blue and yellow in the latter. The claim of these three to be secondary colours is their being each composed of two only of the primaries, and to their being in the prism ; and browns and greys, ranked with them by Hundertpfund and some others, can -only hold a place in a distinct class. The prismatic colours dissolve so insensibly into each other, and form a succession of hues so finely graduated, that it is not possible to perceive the exact limit of each*; but in * In the rainbow and the prism red and violet are the two outermost colours ; and " the red shades off by imperceptible gradations into orange, § 46. NUMBER OF THE PRIMARIES. 69 enumerating the secondary ones, there seems to be no reason for subdividing one of them, as the purple — into two, " purple and violet ; " one of these being a gradation of the secondary colour composed of red and blue, instead of the one result of that union. Though it has been determined by philosophical experiments that the prism, or the rainbow, contains seven colours, it is much more simple for practical purposes to con fine the number to six, viz. the three primaries and their three intermediate compounds. Indeed, if two be admitted between fed and blue, two should be admitted between red and yellow ; and also between blue and yellow ; which would increase the number to nine. The actual number, however, is of little importance in the use of colours ; a more essential point is to define the character of each, that we may under stand what we mean in mentioning its name ; and that, in speaking of a red or a yellow, we may not convey the idea of a pink, or of a canary-colour. Experiments which prove that the prismatic colours are " red, green, blue, and violet," or according to Dr. Young, that "'red) greeny and/ violet are the fundamental colours," and that *Hine perfect sensations of yellow and blue may be pro duced, the former by a mixture of red and green, and the latter by green and violet," can be of "no use in the har monious combination of colours for ornamental purposes ; nor can any observations on the relative position and quantity of colour resulting from philosophical speculation be taken as guides in polychrome decoration. orange into yellow," and so on with the rest. Por a body to exhibit truly its colour it must be placed in white light. " A red wafer," as Brewster observes, appears red in the white light of day because it reflects red light more copiously than any of the other colours. If we place a red wafer in yellow light it can no longer appear red, because there is not a particle of red light in the yellow light which it could reflect." In like manner any other coloured body reflects the rays corresponding to its own colour. " The colours therefore of bodies arise from their property of reflecting or transmitting to the eye certain rays of white light, while they stifle or stop the remaining rays." F 3 70 ON COLOUR. Pari I. C. The tertiaries have also been reckoned as three: russet, citrine, and olive. D. But there are others which require to be arranged in a separate class distinct from the primaries, secondaries, and tertiaries, as browns, greys, and various neutral tints (into which black often enters as a principal element), together with clay and stone colours, drab and others. These neces sarily form a fourth class, and I have called them, by way of distinction, "Irregular colours." They have also received the name of " semi-neutral." Many of them are very varied in their hues. Browns, for instance, have sometimes a deep sombre character ; others are brighter in proportion as they have more red or more yellow in their composition, e. g. ches- nut, &c. ; and red-browns, yellow-browns, and purple-browns designate certain varieties, all of which hold a place among warm colours. For whenever such a quantity of blue is added as to deprive brown of its warmth, it passes into another grade of hues, and approaches the greys. Of browns, the "chief constituent" is said to be "yellow;" and they are considered to be compounded of yellow and black ; of black, red, and yellow; of black and orange; of blue, red, and orange; of the three primaries — red, blue, and yellow; or of the three secondaries, or of the three tertiaries, the richer browns having more red and yellow, and the lighter browns being sometimes diluted with white. But brown is also com pounded of red and black ; and it is inconsistent to maintain that red does not enter into the composition of brown, and at the same time to admit that it is partly compounded of orange — a colour of which red is a constituent. Again, black and red form a better brown than most of those above enume rated; black and yellow giving a very imperfect brown, and rather partaking of an olive mixture ; and a similar objection may be made to blue, red, and yellow, and their derivatives. Greys are composed of black and white. Other combina- § 46- GREYS, BLACK, AND WHITE. 71 tions are considered to form them, as blue, red, and yellow, in various quantities according to the character of the required hue, with or without the addition of white : or one of the primaries mixed with its remaining complementary or acci dental colour, added to white : as red with green and white ; or violet, orange, and green with white; and others. The character of the grey will depend on the excess of one of its component colours ; and a black-grey, or a blue-grey, a green-, an olive-, or a violet-grey, will take its tone from the greater quantity of the black, or blue, or of the blue and yellow (i.e. green), or of the blue and red (i.e. violet), &c. which may characterise it. Another kind of grey, or neutral tint, is com posed of purple and black ; and other hues may be made with black so as to form various dark greys. As grey is a cold colour, the addition of too large a quantity of the warm red has an undue effect upon it, by altering its character from a cold to a warm hue ; as the addition of an undue quantity of cold blue to a warm brown changes the nature of the latter, and brings it into another class of colours. The addition of white has a modifying effect ; and while red and yellow, varied in quantity, produce the different tones of scarlet and orange, when diluted with white they give straw, and lemon, and clay colour ; and drabs, as well as the lighter browns, are produced by the addition of white to their original basis. Any one of the primaries mixed with white forms a distinct hue, as does the union of any two of them with white ; thus, red and blue and white, in different proportions, form varieties of purple, violet, and other mixed colours, varying according to the greater or less quantity of blue and red. E. Black and White. — While some have classed black and white with the primaries, others maintain that neither of them merits the name of colour; black absorbing all light, and reflecting none ; and white appearing colourless, though in reality (at least as white light) composed of the three prima- F 4 72 ON COLOUR. Pari i. ries. But this is a philosophical view of them which does not appertain to the question of their employment for orna mentation. Whatever may be their properties, or their right to the name of colours, the eye has positive evidence of their holding a place, and having their own effect, when in com bination with other colours. 47. The tones and gradations of each primary, as well as of any other colour, belong, of course, to the same class as its fundamental hue ; but the moment a simple colour is mixed with any other, it ceases to belong to the same class ; and if it is sometimes the custom to classify crimson, scarlet, pink, and others with the reds, they cannot be reckoned among the primaries ; scarlet, for instance, having a certain quantity of yellow mixed with the red, and therefore being a compound colour. It is, therefore, only for convenience' sake, or in accordance with a conventional custom, that we are justified in classing them among the reds. 48. Accidental Colours. — The accidental colour to any one of the three primaries, as is well known, is the union of the other remaining two. Thus, green (i.e. blue and yellow) is acci dental to red, orange to blue, and purple to yellow. Black and white are also accidental to each other. As the simple primary is accidental to the compound secondary colour (red to green, blue to orange, and yellow to purple), so a tertiary, in like manner, has its accidental colour, in the remaining one not forming part of its composition. Though the existence of accidental colours was known before Newton's time, he was the first to make any careful experiments respecting them, an account of which he sent to Locke; but this was not published till 1829, in Lord King's life of that philosopher. The following are among Ithe observations made by Sir David Brewster on the subject of laccidental colours. If we place a red wafer on a sheet of white | paper, and fix the eye on the red spot, and then turn the eye § 47—S9. ACCIDENTAL COLOURS. 73 to the white paper, we shall see on it an image of that spot of a blueish green colour. And the images of other coloured wafers will be changed according to the accidental colour of each, red becoming a blueish green, orange a blue, yellow an indigo, green a reddish violet, blue an orange-red, indigo an orange-yellow, violet a yellow-green, black a white, and white a black. The accidental colour is what the other wants to make white light, and some style it the " complementary," others the " opposite." The reason of the green image of the red being seen Brewster shows to be, that " the part of the retina occupied by the red image is strongly excited," or *' deadened by its continual action." The sensibility to red light will therefore be diminished; "the deadened part of the retina will be insensible to the red rays which form part of the white light from the paper, and will see the paper of that colour which arises from all the rays in the white light of the paper but red," i. e. blueish green. Again, " when a black wafer is on a white ground, the portion of the retina on which the black image falls, in place of being -deadened, is protected, as it were, by the absence of light, while all the surrounding parts of the retina, being excited by the white light of the paper, will be deadened by its continued action." Hence, the eye " will see a white circle corresponding to the black image -on the retina." But it does not therefore follow that any two colours which are accidental to each other should harmonise — they may, or they may not ; nor is there any necessity that the colours which are intended to convey to the eye the actual impression of several distinct ones harmoniously com bined should be of the same quantity as when they are required to make white light. 49. If any effect is to be produced by a polychrome ornament, it must be totally distinct from that of white light, as I have already shown (p. 60). Again, two of the three primaries accord ,with each other in very different ways. Eed and blue, 74 ON COLOUR. Part I. which are contrasts, have a very different effect in juxtaposi tion from that produced by the juxtaposition of red and yellow, or of blue and yellow ; and because blue accords well with scarlet or with orange, it does not follow that red must accord with green, or purple with yellow. They affect each other differently ; for while orange makes blue appear sharper by contrast, green lowers red by not offering the same con trast. Green does not stand in the same relation to red, as orange does to blue. It is therefore a fallacy to suppose that because orange harmonises with blue, green must harmonise with red, or yellow with purple. Besides, much depends on what tone of one is placed in juxtaposition with the parti cular tone of another; there is one tone of red which approaches towards a concord with a particular tone of green, while some other tones of these two colours are disagreeable and even discordant ; and so far from the blue-green (which is the accidental colour of red) being the most harmonious com bination with it, a yellow-green is far more agreeable (see below, Sect. VI.); and here, as in many other cases, theory is at variance with fact. (See above, pp. 61, 62.) 50. Harmony of colour has too often been limited to simi larity of colour; and Hundertpfund, using the words of Leonardo, says, " harmony requires colours to be of the same nature, contrast being produced by bringing colours in con tact with each other of an opposite character." Contrast is certainly so produced, but there is also harmony by contrast, as well as harmony by analogy ; and the term contrast cannot be used in direct contradistinction to harmony. Blue and yellow are contrasts, as Leonardo observes, but red and green, which he also considers contrasts, are opposed to each other under very different conditions. Blue with red is. a contrast, but of a very different kind from green with red, which are opposed to each other as accidental colours. There are contrasts of various kinds. Some are opposed § 50. KINDS OF HARMONT. 75 as warm and cold colours ; some from other properties ; they should therefore be kept distinct, and when the term is used it is indefinite, and apt to mislead, unless the particular kind of contrast is specified. (See Sect. V.) There are then : a. Harmony by contrast, as red (and still more scarlet) and blue; orange and blue, &c. Some are contrasts by coldness and warmth, as those just mentioned ; some by difference of lucidity, as yellow contrasted with black, or with brown. b. Harmony by analogy, as crimson and rich brown, purple and crimson, yellow7 and gold, &c. c. Harmony of tones, as different blues, or reds, or greens, or purples, or yellows, or oranges, &c. ; as where the light one is a ground for its darker companion, in combination with other colours. These differences of tone are useful to lighten up a composition, or pattern, of many colours; and light tones raise, or brighten up, the deeper ones. d. Harmony of hues, which has much the same property as the last, as verdigris-green introduced to lighten up blue- green in a composition, and scarlet or red-lead colour with dark red, &c. There are also colours which diminish each other's effect, and deaden a neighbouring one ; as green lowers the force of red, especially when alone with it, and in the same quantity and intensity of tone. (See above, p. 62.) Others again raise the force of those they are combined with, as white heightens the rose of the face; and so does black also ; and nothing is more becoming to an Ethiopian than a red turban. White of course increases the intensity of black by contrast, as black adds to the brilliancy and distinctness of white. And though white makes a red face look redder, it increases the paleness of a pale complexion. Black too has a similar effect. Light colours also brighten those of a deeper kind; as 76 ON COLOUR. Part I. white, or yellow, put with red and blue, renders these more lively. If intermixed with them it diminishes their depth : thus, yellow when interwoven with crimson gives it an appearance approaching to scarlet ; and white interlaced with blue gives it a lighter tone. Some suit each other from being the one warm the other cold, as red and blue, orange and blue, brown and blue, &c. ; and yet two cold colours sometimes harmonise with each other, as blue and white. Harmony may be defined to be the due proportion of two, or more, colours, which are concords ; and the balance of colour is equally required for those which accord by contrast as by analogy. For though the idea of contrast shocks some innocent minds, a little consideration suffices to show that contrast not only in colours, but in forms, and other combi nations, contributes most powerfully to the beauty of a com position. It is true that the gradations in the different hues of the rainbow are most agreeable, but in ornamenting with colour it is not sufficient to have them so blended that they shall insensibly melt into one another. The effect of each colour is softened and diminished, which is not the object of orna menting with colour (though it may sometimes answer in dresses); and blue, red (or scarlet) and yellow loqk better when contrasted with each other than with the intermediate purple, orange and green. They have a still better effect when black and white are added (see Sect. XVII. Blue, C 7, and D 1, and E 2, and F 1), and though blue, red, and yellow form perfect harmony, there are other combinations with a greater number of colours which are even more agree able for ornamentation (see Sect. XVII. Blue, A 1, C 7, and E2). What Burnet says of the contrast of warm and cold colours in pictures applies with "equal or greater force to their com bination for decorative purposes ; and he shows, that besides § 50. CONTRAST. 77 the necessity for the equilibrium of colours, the warm and cold should be "properly balanced" against each other. " Cool colours (he adds, p. 10) produce a softer influence on the eye than warm, and excite it less," and the use " of a warm colour will increase" the general harmony in a picture, as when red is introduced with " the white, blue, grey, and green in a landscape ; " while, on the other hand, the union of warm colours, which "arrest the attention of the spectator in a greater degree, will be increased by the introduction of a cold " one ; and " the harmony of a picture composed of white, yellow, red, and brown, is increased by the introduction of a blue." The value of such an arrangement is seen in the hot and cold tints of lights and shades, and in the primary colours of the draperies in large paintings, where red. and blue "are often placed upon the same figures to draw the attention of the spectator to such point ;" and " notwithstanding we are told by Du Fresnoy and others, 'not to permit two hostile colours to meet without a medium to unite them,' we see from the earliest times it has been the practice of all the great painters ; so that red and blue has in a manner become the dress in which from custom we always expect to find certain figures clothed, such as Christ, the Virgin, &c." (Burnet on "Colour in Painting," p. 10.) Nor was the use of blue, red, and yellow confined to any one particular school. This is the effect of the harmony of contrast, and Aristotle says (Probl. 3), " we are delighted with harmony, because it is the union of contrary principles having a ratio to each other;" an idea expressed also by Vasari (vol. i. Introd. Pitt. c. iv.) — " L'unione della pittura e una discordanza di colori diversi accordati insieme." It is this very love of con trast which makes us admire the effect of a long line of water on the horizon seen through a wood of fir-trees ; and which taught the builders of all ages the necessity of opposing the vertical to the horizontal line. 78 ON COLOUR. Part I. It is precisely for the purpose of avoiding monotony that contrast is required. And if variety instead of monotony is to be desired any where, it must certainly be in coloured orna ment. The very principle of ornamenting a flat surface is contrast ; and it is on this that all mosaic and inlaid work, and every design whose effect is produced by dark and light colours, depend. The dread, then, of the impropriety of contrast may be dismissed; and those who have overcome their scruples about the use of bright colours, may venture a little farther without apprehension, and may tolerate contrast. The taste has been pronounced by some to be "very French ;" but our neighbours are right, and there is no fear of revolution in adopting it beyond the very desirable one of improving our coloured designs, and ridding many of a prejudice. For though the French are not good artistic " colourists," they are eminently successful in decorative ornament; and here they excel the Dutch as much as these excel them in imita ting the colours of nature. And if the combination of bril liant contrasts in decorative ornament will not always suit a picture which represents nature, this is only consistent with the fact that the two subjects should have a different treat ment. Colours in pictures do not of course admit of the same contrasts as when applied to ornamental purposes ; the mode of using them is also different, and the grey tints as well as shades introduced into a picture prevent the contrast of the different colours being so strong and decided. Nor are colours even for ornamental purposes to be used in the same way on all occasions. Those which would suit fur niture, or decorate a wall, might not be adapted for dresses ; and colours which suit a lady's toilet, would not always, according to our modern taste, be admissible in the simpler costume of men in the civilised communities of Europe. Colours too which suit one complexion are not always adapted to another. I remember a case which may serve to illus trate this remark. Happening one day to call at the house § 51. NAMES OF COLOURS. 79 of a lady who was a brunette, I met there another who was remarkably fair, when the conversation turned on the new mode of fitting up the opera house. The colour selected had been of an orange hue. "How much I admire," said the former, "the colour they have chosen for it." "Do you, indeed," said her light haired friend ; " do you not think blue would have been preferable ? " I felt quite sure before she spoke what her objection would be; and the reason was equally evident why the other preferred the orange hue; and the same difference of opinion would exist about other colours selected without reference to the taste and require ments of the wearer. 51.1 have stated that the names of colours are uncertain and indefinite (p. 68), and in proof of this it is only necessary to ask what idea is conveyed to the mind by the mere mention of a red, or a blue, colour ? A scarlet coat is called red ; and the term red is applied to a rose, a brick, port wine, mul berries, cherries, and other things of very different hues : the sky, a violet, a slate, and a steel helmet are called blue ; puce colour has been transferred to a blue-purple ; and the Arabs, who apply " green " to a mouse-coloured horse as well as to a copper-coloured Abyssinian, call jet-black "blue;" and their " blue horse" may mean one of jet-black, or iron-grey, colour. In like manner, the Welsh glas " blue," or " green," is applied to black (provided it has no brown tinge) ; and grey is also called "blue" (glas). — Hence glastum, a name of woad. It would lead to endless confusion if the names were thus vaguely used in the application of colours ; and yet so un settled is their nomenclature in most countries, that it is often impossible, in reading the description of any object, to form in our mind a true idea of its colour and appearance. Even when we are more particular, and we attempt to point out certain tones which are thought to be well defined, we are not always intelligible ; thus the well-known name of purple conveys no positive idea of the colour we mean ; and some 80 bN COLOUR. Pari I. persist in calling blue "purple," and a violet "blue;" while others adopt this gradation in the prism, "blue, purple, violet, red;" and another gives "blue, purple, and violet, or indigo." The same was the case of old; and not only has there been a question about the ancient " purple," and the meaning of the Greek nroptpvpsos, or the Latin pur- pureus, but these two words have had several meanings at different periods; and in the writings of different authors. The irop(pvpsos of Greek had a very wide range ; and it was even used to signify any thing "bright," whatever the real colour might be. Homer uses it for the colour of the sea ; the "purpureus (pannus) late qui splendeat" of Horace (A. P. 15) might be of any bright hue ; and the white swan was called by him "purpureis ales coloribus" (iv. Od. i. 10). There is no evidence of its name having been taken originally from Trvp, " fire ; " another word from that root, irvppos, was used for red or scarlet (as by Herodotus and others) ; and Pyrrhus, like Eufus, was applied to men of fiery complexion. Pliny speaks of three purples — one scarlet, another resembling violet, and a third like coagulated blood. The dress of our Saviour is called in St. Matthew xxvii. 28, " scarlet : " in St. John xix. 2, " purple ; " both perhaps alluding rather to its richness of colour than to its exact hue. The imperial purple, as seen in the unchanged mosaics of Eavenna, is the hue which may be received as true purple, that of the stone called porphyry being a far redder hue; and the imperial purple is composed of nearly equal parts of red and blue, which may also be considered to be a true violet colour. 52. It would be difficult, and very unnecessary, to mention all the different tints which are said " by Eoman artists in mosaic to exceed 30,000 ; " but it may be useful to notice the names of the principal colours in some languages ; and I therefore introduce them in English, Arabic, French, German, Greek, Latin, and Italian. English. Arabic. French. German. Greek. Latin. Italian. Blue .... Kohlee (graduated as : Bleu (fonce et Blau (dunkel iaictvBos (Egyp Caaruleus, cy- Azzurro, tur- ghamuk,"dark •," maf- clair, " dark and blau, hell blau, tian, Greek, and aneus (hysgi- chino(azzurro tooh, "light;" Heb. light"). " dark and Roman blues numwaswoad- or turchino- rton, "blue" or light blue "). were mostly ox blue, and was scuro, "dark "blue-purple.") ides of copper ; mixed with blue;"azzurro Azrek (/ . Zerka), the Kvavos was a madder - root dolce, "light "darkest blue; "used blue carbonate in purple dyes. blue"). also for the " darkest of copper. They Vitr. vii. 1. black." are generally mixed with car bonate of lime). Plin. xxxv.6). indigo . . Neeleh (i. e. " indigo "). Bleu d'inde (in Indig-blau (in vbkivBos (uiSikov) . (Indicum*) . Indaco. (sky) . . Semmawee (i.e. "hea digo). digo). venly".) Bleu de ciel, or celeste. Himmel blau . Kvavos xvaveos (from blue car bonate of copper, Kvavos or xpooo- KOAAtt). Caeruleus, cy- aneus (csesius, gray-blue, lo- mentum, co- elon). Celeste. pale (smalt) Genzaree, or Zengaree (from Genzeer, "ver digris, " bluestone). Bleu d'email . . (Schmalte) (Smalt used by the Egyptians.) Azzurro di ' smalto. Bleu de roi, or (Kobalt) . . (Supposed to be the xaAKin, i. e. " coccus." But b'D"D is properly crimson. 2 Chron. ii. 7. Laalee, or doodeh, from dood, "the worm" Carmine . . . Carmin . . . . Carminio. kcrmcz, or coccus baphica, or cochineal, from which carmine is precipitated by means of alum and - distilled water. 1 IBw 00 CO English. Vermilion colour (originally from the Kermes worm (whence " ver meil)," after wards from Cin nabar. (Cinnabar, a na tive red sulphu- ret of mercury ; vermilion being a factitious col., 100 mercury to 16 sulphur.) Scarlet (the scar let grain of Po land is the coc cus polonicus, found on the roots of the " scleranthus pe- rennis," formerly much used for its red dye). Zoonjoofr, or zoon- goofr, or zingifr, pro perly cinnabar; Heb. "It}>tj>, which is also "red ochre," jjuKtos in LXX. Zingifr or zoongoofr ; Heb. -0®. Werdee, not rose- colour, though de • rived from werd " rose ; " Hebr. »3{J> nj?'?in,ornvl?in»3B'0 .Win is "worm;" vj£> is the " coccus.' French. Vermilion, coral- lin. Cinabre. Ecarlate, ponceau. German. Cochenilla Zinnober Scharlach Greek. piKros (properly red-lead, used also for red- ochre, or red oxide of iron, the best being from Lemnos and Cappadocia), (oSoeiSr)s (?) '. . /5o5o«5))S . . . Rufus (yellow- red), rutilus, flammeus. Ruber (rubise radix). Puniceus. Roseus . . . Color di foco Rosso di robbia. Color di rosa, rosaceo. Lacca. Lacca. Color di per- sica. Couleur de ga- rance. Coulenr de fleur degre'nade; pon ceau. Cerise.Couleur de rose . (Krapp;farber- rothe) Rosen-roth, ro- sen-farbe. Khokhee (from khokh, "peach"). Couleur de peche Color persicus 00 English. Arabic. French. German. Greek. Latin. Italian. Purple .... Damson-colour or blue-purple(called puce). Brown-purple . Brown-claret, or maroon *). Violet-purple Bluish-purple Forfeeree, ergooanee (the Hebrew ergoon, |1J1N or JDJ-IK, the blue purple 117071 is from the Helix ian thina). Pourpre . . . Couleur de prune. Purpur . . . iropfyvpsos, (pOWlKlOS Purpureus (pur- ple,from the mu rex and bucci num; and purple glass stained with oxide of manganese) (ostrum). Purpureo, por- porino, bisso. Rosso-bruno. Amatito. Amatito, ama- tisto (Cenn. p. 24). Purpureo.Pavonazzo, pagonazzo,paonazzo,(morello). Violato, pa vonazzo, pur pureo. Menoweesh .... Oodee (also " wood colour "). Pourpre de car dinal. iroptpvpeos , . . iaKivBos . . . Purpureus . . Purpureus . . Violet, imperial- purple. Mulberry-colour. Benefsigee .... Violet, couleur violette. Couleur de lilas. Violet . . . toetSrjs, iroptpvpsos Violaceus, pur pureus. Apricot-colour , Mishmishee. o z o ot-lo a& * Maroon, or marrone, properly chesnut (marron), but said by Mr. JField to be composed of black and red, or black and purple, &e. Yellow (bright — being chrome No. 2). Yellow (ochre) . Saffron-colour . Golden . , . Canary-colour . Straw-colour . . Brimstone-colour(Yellow orpiment colour ; yellow sulphate of ar senic). Orange . . . Green (bright — partaking of moss, emerald, grass, and ver digris-green). ¦ Verdigris-green (verditer), most commonly used by the ancients. Arabic. inV, asfer (/. saffra) Id. (Ion e' tun) . Zahfaran. . . . Lon e' dahab, dtha- habce. Lem6onee (lemon-co lour). Lon e' tibn, tibnee. . Kabreetee . . . . Portokanee (from por- tokan, " orange,'' i. e. of Portugal). f>T», akhderXpa) . KpOKlVOS . Xpvo-eios travSapaien, yellow oxide of lead, and apcrfliiKov, auripigmentum, "orpiment," were ancient yellows. XXapos (the an cient greens were carbonates " or acetates of cop per). (XP»li and Sect. XVHI. §55 VIII. IX. GEOUNDS AND SINGLE COLOUES. 105 give it a particular tone. Thus when a warmer, or a colder, tone is to be produced, more red, or more blue, may be intro duced ; but for this and the subject of quantity and propor tion I must refer to Sect. XVIII. The proper hue of each is also a point of great importance ; for when a bright red, blue, or green, is required to agree with another bright colour, the introduction of any one of these of a duller hue than its companion would be fatal to their general effect. This is sometimes the case in the old mosaic pavements at Eome and elsewhere ; but it may be accounted for by the workmen making the best of the materials they had at hand, and being forced to place dull reds and greens in juxtaposition with brighter hues. And it is probable that the heavy red of por phyry would not have been combined with serpentine if the unlimited choice of brighter and more accordant colours had enabled them to make a better selection.* But it may also be attributed to a vitiated Eoman taste. (See below, p. 151.) Of the proper quantity and proportion of colours I shall also treat in Sects. XVIII. and XIX. IX. Grounds and Single Colours. — A colour, when used as a ground, has a very different effect, and is under very different conditions from the same introduced in combina tion with others in a pattern. Thus green, so intractable in large quantities when with other colours, is allowable for covering the walls of a room ; and light green, greyish-green, tea-green, and others, when in large masses, look better if used alone. There is, however, a certain hue of light blue, or bird's-egg-green t, which may even be used as a ground for many other combined colours ; and tea-green is very suitable for a wall hung with pictures, provided it is plain, without any pattern. (See above, p. 97, Sect. IV.) * An instance of this may be seen in No. 2 of Mr. Digby Wyatt's interesting collection of the " Mosaics of the Middle Ages," and particularly in fig. 2 ; and again in No. 3, where the want of harmony in the mosaic is remarkable. f Bird's-egg-green is rather a hue of green-blue than of green. 106 ON COLOUE. Past I. The same hue of green which would have a disagreeable, or even a discordant, effect, when combined with a particular colour, may occasionally be introduced upon a gold, black, or some other ground in contact with that same colour without appearing any longer discordant ; the ground having altered the relative conditions of the two; and thus instances of green with the most discordant tones are sometimes bearable, as in Indian and Persian patterns, on an orange, black, salmon, red, or even on a pink, or purple, ground, where much gold is introduced, which would be intolerable without the same quantity of gold. I shall have occasion to mention examples of these in Sect. XIX. pp. 152, 155, 156. Pink, again, scarcely accords with any other colour, and looks better alone. It is too frequently overwhelmed by a neighbour. It is true that, in nature, pink has often an agreeable effect with green, as in the rose with its leaves, and the red pink of the wood sorrel suits its leaves also ; but a piece of drapery, or a dress, of these two colours would be far from harmonious. And as I have shown (pp. 19, 100) colours have a very different aspect in a garden, and when used for ornamentation in building, or in fabrics. Pink too sometimes looks well with white (which does not overwhelm it), and with some light hues ; but then the effect is poor, or at most pretty and insignificant. But though too light to bear the union with most other colours, it looks well alone in draperies and dresses. I do not, however, in speaking of " draperies and dresses," mean that these two are subject to the same condi tions ; for what suits one is often ill adapted to the other, and we should be sorry to see all the contrasts allowable in draperies transferred to costume. But in both of them a simple pink hue is preferable to one intermixed with other colours ; and in dresses it is difficult to find any trimmings suited to pink, unless they be black, or a dark purple. This fact of some colours giving a different impression, when in a mass, is consistent with the difficulty of judging of a design, §55 IX. OP GROUNDS. MOSAICS. 107 and of the effect of colours, from a small specimen, as they look very different in that and in the piece. Black, purple-puce, chocolate-brown of a purple hue, grey, buff, and others, answer as a ground ; though, if half the same quantity were introduced into a pattern, they would be insuf ferable, heavy, and gloomy, independent of their offending against the due proportion of quantity. The same may be said of gold, which has a beautiful effect as a ground ; but which, if used in half the same quantity in combination with other colours, would be gaudy and meretricious. Many instances of this might be cited ; but it will be sufficient to notice the beautiful ceiling of the sacristy of St. Mark's, at Venice, which is also remarkable for the admirable harmony of its colours. And here again we perceive how different are the conditions of gold, and still more of a gold ground, from those of yellow, or even of orange ; and, though an orange ground is allowable, the same expanse covered by either of these two colours would be disagreeable. Still worse would be the employment of overwhelming masses of yellow, or of orange, interwoven with other colours, in a design. Nor could white, which, though cold, is tolerable as a ground, be intermixed in large proportions with other colours without injuring their effect. Gold is one of the best of grounds ; but it is better as a mosaic, or slightly figured, than as a plain gilt surface. For coloured mosaics its effect- is admirable ; but a profusion of gilding in a building, or on furniture, is heavy and tawdry, and is one of the faults of French decoration. Amongst the best for grounds in draperies are greys, stone-colour, buff, drab, chocolate, and other light browns, black, white, and purple, which accord well with other colours. On the other hand, when greys, light greens, pink, and some others, are used singly to cover large spaces (as for wall papers), patterns of that same colour of a darker tone may be introduced with good effect. A cream colour is almost always a more agreeable ground 108 ON COLOUE. Past I. than pure white; and their comparative merits may be judged of in Parian ware and in plaster casts. Black is an excellent ground, and sets off other colours when properly assorted, especially if there is sufficient white (or yellow, or orange) to give the black its full effect, and prevent its losing its real hue. How much better, for instance, are red, blue, yellow, and white, on a black, than on a grey (or light), ground ; and the loss in the effect of black, without any white (or yellow) near to it, should never be disregarded. It is not advisable, when black is used as a ground, that it should always appear in large masses, with the other colours dotted upon it ; the effect is often more agreeable when, as in many Persian carpets, the black ground only appears as a thin fillet, or edging, round the other hues, showing itself here and there to assert its position as the ground of the pattern, and giving relief to it, which it is sure to do when properly set off by the judicious intro duction of white, yellow, or orange, in contact with it. The black absorbs light, and heightens, by contrast, the other colours, especially by candlelight, if properly combined ; but if blue, and green, and red, or scarlet, are arranged with black lines between them, the effect is bad, and those lines would then be better if yellow, or even white. But a black ground can seldom be introduced into a ceiling; and, unless the room were of considerable height, it would be fatal to its appear ance. A low room, with much black in the ceiling, would appear still lower and most gloomy. And, indeed, for a coloured ceiling to look well, the room should always be of sufficient height, and be well lighted. The ceiling of the library at the Cathedral of Siena affords a remarkable instance of colours on black, blue, red, and gold grounds ; but here the arrangement is ' subservient to the effect of Pinturicchio's beautiful frescoes on the walls, which is assisted by a wainscoat of dark wood twelve feet in height at the lower part of the room. §55X. THE WHOLE WALL NOT TO BE COLOURED. 109 It is not sufficient that a particular ground should be arbi trarily selected ; it must be adapted to the position it is to hold, to the general ornamentation, and to the character of the surrounding objects. And though black may be generally looked upon as a good ground for colours, it is seldom suited to walls or ceilings. It may be used for some draperies, dresses, and other objects, or even occasionally for columns and furniture; while, in glass, a black ground is rarely admissible. White is a very useful ground for other colours, as it heightens a room, and gives more light than any other ; but it is often cold and harsh when covering a large space; and, beautiful as it is in the ceiling of the library of the Vatican, it is there also open to that objection. The same crudity of ^effect may be observed in that of the Eoman Court at the Crystal Palace of Sydenham ; while the colours of the ceilings in the Greek court, and in the Alhambra Court of Lions, are admirable specimens of harmony of colour. X. A whole wall, ceiling, or other space, should not be entirely covered over with rich ornament; and so also in a coloured piece of drapery, or any ornamental work, it is better to have some portion of it much less rich, and of less com plicated pattern, than the rest ; and, in some cases, to have .only a border round a simple ground destitute of any pattern, as it is apt to fatigue the eye when overloaded with equal rich ness of detail throughout. This is still more important in a coloured building, where, if the whole walls, columns, and other parts, are covered with elaborate and coloured patterns, the eye feels a want of repose; and the same when a building is covered entirely .with sculptured ornament without colour. The richly carved part not only , requires an unsculptured portion in order that it shall not fatigue the eye, but is im proved and set off by the contrast ; and contrast is as necessary for effect in form, quantity of detail, and the position of lines, 110 ON COLOUE. Pabt I. as it is in colour. On this principle, great effect is sometimes given to a coloured pattern by having a portion of the com position, on the wall of a building, without any colour at all ; and, for the same reason, an expanse of wall in a room often looks well when painted with a single uniform ground sur rounded by a rich pattern (see Part II, § 56). And I here agree with the remark of Hogarth, that " when the eye is glutted with a succession of variety, it finds relief in a certain degree of sameness ; and even plain space becomes agreeable, and, properly introduced and contrasted with variety, adds to it more variety.* XL Again, certain colours are better suited for some places than for others, and the brighter and more transparent for higher positions , and if the hangings of a room are scarlet, crimson with gold has a richer and better effect for the chairs than scarlet and gold. A carpet may be darker than the general tone of the draperies, and some of its colours may be carried up by the walls, or the curtains; but if the carpet is dark, the furniture shows better by being of a lighter hue. Eed, or a light colour, is better than blue for table covers ; and though green is not to be recommended for daylight, it lights up well at night, which blue does not ; and this then often appears black, or when of a light tone is scarcely to be distinguished from green. Much, however, may be done to give blue its proper effect, even by candlelight, either by placing a light tone of blue close to the darker one, or by interspersing it with white, which will often lead the eye to see the darker blue, and prevent its appearing black, as already shown in pp. 97, 101. This may be seen in some Persian carpets, where two blues are used. And if some of these have too much green for daylight, they have a good effect at night, except when in excess. Bark green, like dark * "Analysis of Beauty," p. 16. §55X1.- XHI. PROPER POSITION OF COLOURS. Ill blue, looks darker by candlelight, and is not an eligible colour by daylight. XII. Colours that harmonise well may appear less pleasing, in consequence of each not being properly placed next to a neighbouring one that accords well with it. The arrange ment must therefore be consulted ; and it is not enough that they should be such as accord, they must be so placed as to have their full effect on each other. Thus when a blue is only placed at the edges of a pattern, the centre of which consists of red, yellow, and other colours, it looks isolated ; it should be connected by being carried through the inner part, in order to give the full combination of all the colours, and the blue would thus be united with the other colours in the centre of the pattern. When white, or yellow, is intro duced, a pattern is generally improved by the addition of black, or by a black ground; and a black fillet separating each colour in a complicated pattern has a good effect (see Sect. IX. p. 108). As an instance how much the same colours may be affected by their arrangement, I may mention that in a combination of red and blue and black and white and gold, which is harmonious, if the red is placed between the black and white, on a gold ground, they all look poor; while black and white and red and blue, or black and white and blue and red, are a pleasing arrangement (see also pp. 62, 63, 137). Again, green and black and red and blue are improved by the addition of white, which last being a contrast to black gives it its full power. XIII. The combination of warm and cold colours, in proper proportion, is a very great means of obtaining harmony ; and thus we find that when red or orange predominates, a good effect is produced by a corresponding quantity of blue. But it is not sufficient for one colour to be warm to make it accord with another which is cold ; and though orange har- 112 ON COLOUR. Pabt I. monises with blue, it has not necessarily the same effect with white ; and blue and white (both cold colours) though their effect is cold, are an agreeable concord without the assistance of any warm companion. XIV. The colours that accord with each other may be divided into different classes, as may those which are not concords. Sometimes two colours agree by the harmony of positive contrast (see p. 76) ; sometimes by the harmony of analogy. Others require a third to make a complete com bination, without which they are deficient in effect ; which frequently happens in consequence of having too near an affinity to each other ; others, again, require more than one companion to form a proper harmonious union ; and to such colours in juxtaposition I apply the term " wanting." Sometimes harmony is obtained by two colours, as orange and blue; sometimes two colours will not form a concord, without the addition of a third, to complete it; occasionally a concord is only to be obtained by a combination of several colours ; and sometimes a colour, though it may not cause a discord, fails to make an agreeable combination with any other one or two colours, and is better by itself, as pink and others already mentioned (pp. 105, 106). Sometimes it is better as a ground (pp. 105, 106) than when in combination with others of nearly the same quantity. Sometimes, on the other hand, a colour does not look well alone, and requires to be in combination with another, as scarlet, which wants the contrast of blue, or some other colour. But even though colours may be found to possess their full effect when"" alone, they may also enter well into a large pattern composed of numerous others, and even browns, buff, and many more well suited for grounds, may be combined in a general de sign, provided they are inferior in quantity to the primary hues. Two colours then agree — 1. By the Harmony of contrast: § 55 XIV. -XVI. AGREEMENT OF COLOURS. 1} 3 (pp. 74, 76, 98.) — 2. By the Harmony of analogy: — 3. By the addition of a third, without which they are wanting to com plete harmony : — 4. By the addition of several : — 5. Some times a colour is better by itself: — 6.< Sometimes a colour is better as a ground for others. - I have already noticed the contrasts of colours (Sect. V. p. 98). All do not of course offer the same kind or the same amount of contrast, as they do not harmonise or disagree equally, or under the same conditions; and red with blue, white with black, white with red, and others, have each a very different effect on their companion when in juxta position. Dark and light colours, in like manner, vary in their effect on each other ; and the union of these last is not well adapted for ornamentation, being frequently harsh. XV. Some colours disagree from being positive discords ; some fail to accord with each other from their tones being of unequal intensity ; some from their proportions in quan tity being too much disregarded ; and some (as mentioned in Sects. X. and XIV.) from wanting another colour to complete the harmonious combination. Of the latter, I may mention an instance in blue and red, which two, though concords, require the addition of yellow to make perfect harmony. XVI. I shall first notice the arrangement of colours by twos, and show their agreement or disagreement. This is merely with a view to establish their effect upon each other in juxtaposition, without reference to the quantity of each. Among the most pleasing of those which harmonise with each other, in pairs, are : — 1. Blue and orange (or gold). 2. Blue and scarlet. 3. Blue and white. 4. Blue and black. 5. Blue and horsechesnut. 6. Purple and orange (or gold). 7. Green and gold. 8. Black and orange (or gold). 9. Horsechesnut-brown and orange (or gold). 10. Brown and gold. 1 1. Crimson and gold. 1 *4 0N COLOUR. Paet I. Others harmonise in a minor degree ; and others are dis cords. Others again, though not positive discords, are disagreeable. Some, which I have called "discordant," are less obnoxious than those marked " discords ; " and others want one or more additional colours to complete harmony. I shall notice them in the following lists. For instances of harmonious combination of several colours, the reader is referred to Sects. XVII. XVIII. and XIX. ; and for the tones of the principal colours, see Plate m. fig. 5. Blue. (See Buff, Gold, Canary, Crimson, Cerise, Fawn-colour.) 1. Blue and red harmonise, but want yellow, and scarlet is preferable to red. (Of Blue, see p. 65. In flowers, double delphinium, &c.) la.Blue and crimson.* (See Crimson.) 2. Blue and scarlet (see Blue in Sect. XVII.) harmonise, and are more harmonious, from the addition of the yellow contained in the scarlet, . than blue and red, e. g. in flowers, blue salvia, and scarlet verbena ; or double delphinium, and scarlet geranium, &c. 3. Blue and salmon-colour harmonise. 4. Blue and orange, the most agreeable harmony, e.g. blue salvia and marigold ; or blue corn-flower, and Coreopsis Drummondii. (See Sect. XVII. Blue A, B, C, D, E, F.) 5. Blue and yellow harmonise, though inferior to, and less warm and rich than, blue with orange (e. g. blue salvia and yellow calceo laria). But blue should not be placed between two yellows (nor a yellow between two blues), except in certain cases, as when a blue is separated from a red on one side, and from a green (or other colour) on the other, by a yellow line. 6. Blue and white harmonise. 7. Blue and silver harmonise, but cold. 8. Blue and black harmonise. But if red is added they are wanting ; and require the addition of white, or yellow, or orange. (See Blue, A 17, in Sect. XVII.) 9. Blue and horsechesnut harmonise, and have a rich effect. 10. Blue and chesnut harmonise. 11. Blue and chocolate harmonise. 12. Blue and brown harmonise. * By this arrangement I have generally placed the harmonious combinations in the beginning, and the discords at the end. Those with the number followed by a letter, as la, show that the same combination is given elsewhere, if referred to under a name in italics, as here under crimson. §55 XVI. BLUE. YELLOW. 115 13. Blue and stone-colour harmonise, but the blue is rather too powerful for it. 14. Blue and drab harmonise, but the blue is rather too powerful. 15. Blue and pink, a poor effect, but not a discord. 16. Blue and peach, a poor effect, the blue also overpowers its com panion. 17. Blue and green are wanting, and require another colour to com plete the harmony. 18. Blue and purple harmonise by analogy, but wanting; they require the addition of scarlet and gold.* 19. Blue and blue-purple wanting by analogy. This blue-purple is what is generally called puce. 20. Blue and lilac wanting by analogy, and poor. 21. Blue and grey harmonize, but wanting, and seldom useful in combination with others ; except when grey is employed as a ground. Hues of Biue : — Shy-blue. This is what we call shy-blue, but the name is indefinite. Blue of the sky is very different ; it is that of a southern climate (see p. 65) and is the true blue colour. 1. Sky-blue and lilac wanting by analogy, and poor. 2. Sky-blue and pink poor. 3. Sky-blue and white poor and cold. (Other combinations are not deserving of notice.) Torquoise-blue and drab (nankin, fawn, and light chesnut) harmonise. Yellow. (See Blue, Gold, Canary, Drab, Stone-colour.) Yellow must be used in moderate proportions, as already shown p. 94, Sect. III. ; and is very inferior in effect to gold, the place of which, indeed, it can by no means hold (see Gold). It is also very inferior to orange in many cases ; but it serves to brighten up a com position, to separate blue and red, and to form a harmonious combination with them. (By yellow I mean Crome Mo. 2. See pp. 67, 87. In flowers, yellow calceolaria, broom, and furze.) 1. Yellow and black harmonise ; but are inferior to and colder than orange and black, and not so well balanced. (See Sect. XVII. Black with Yellow.) 2. Yellow and green harmonise, but inferior to orange and green. 3. Yellow and horsechesnut-colour harmonise; e.g. the y. petals of the hollyhock and its purple eye (but y. not so rich as orange). * When marked as " wanting," the colours required to complete their har monious effect will be generally found in Sect. XVH. (where several colours are combined), provided they are of snfBcient importance to be recommended for combination in designs. I 2 116 ON COLOUR. PamI. 4. Yellow and brown harmonise, but inferior to No. 3. (See Brown.) 5. Yellow and chesnut harmonise *, but wanting by analogy. 6. Yellow and purple harmonise, as in the heartsease. 7a. Yellow and red-purple wanting and disagreeable, and the purple has a brown appearance. 8. Yellow and pink-purple, or mulberry, wanting and disagreeable, but not a positive discord. 9. Yellow and blue-purple harmonise, as in one kind of heartsease, but colder than and inferior to orange. 10. Yellow and white wanting, and poor by daylight ; but they light up well at night. 10a. Yellow and gold (see Gold) harmonise by analogy, but wanting by analogy. 11. Yellow and orange harmonise by analogy, but wanting by ana logy. They would be improved by blue and black. 12. Yellow and red harmonise, but wanting, they require blue. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, A 1, 2, 3 ; B 1, 2, 6 ; C 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ; and F 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.) 13. Yellow and scarlet wanting by analogy. 14. Yellow and crimson harmonise, and better than the two preceding, but inferior in effect to crimson with orange or gold ; and the yellow is overpowered. 15. Yellow and pink discord, disagreeable, and poor. 16. Yellow and peach discord, disagreeable, and poor. 17. Yellow and salmon-colour poor, and wanting by analogy. 18. Yellow and grey poor and wanting. 19. Yellow and slate-colour wanting. 20. Yellow and lilac wanting. (See Lilac, C 2, Sect. XVLT.) 21. Yellow and drab wanting. 22. Yellow and buff wanting by analogy. 23. Yellow and silver wanting, but light up at night. Canary is not sufficiently powerful to combine with most colours, and generally offends, in combinations, against the rule of having the tones of equal intensity, (p. 99, Sect. VI.) 1. Canary and blue harmonise, but are rather cold ; and the canary overpowered by the blue. 2. Canary and yellow wanting by analogy. 3. Canary and crimson harmonise, but the canary overpowered by the crimson ; cerise would be rather better. 4. Canary and green poor. The canary is overpowered, and takes a greenish hue. * Chesnut colour is, from custom, considered lighter than that of the Spanish chesnut fruit, and I therefore apply it according to common acceptation. Use horsechesnut for the richest colour of this fruit. §55 XVL BUFF. GOLD. ORANGE. 117 5. Canary and black harmonise, but the black is too powerful for the canary. Straw-colour, and Lemon-colour, and Buff are open to the same objection in combination as canary, being overpowered by most colours; — as is the pale yellow of yellow hawhweed. Buff. (See Yellow, Gold, Red, Crimson, Purple, Blue-purple, Lilac, Green, Blue-green, Black, White, Grey, Brown, Chesnut, Drab, Stone.) 1. Buff and blue harmonise, but buff overpowered by its companion. 2. Buff and crimson harmonise, but buff overpowered by its com panion. 3. Buff and scarlet harmonise, but buff overpowered by its com panion. 4. Buff and purple harmonise, but buff overpowered by its com panion. 5. Buff and blue-purple harmonise, but buff overpowered by its companion. 6. Buff and chesnut wanting ; they would be better with blue, or with blue and black, and scarlet. Gold. (See Orange, Red, Slate, Brown, Chesnut.) Gold is more beautiful in combination with other colours than yellow, which is harsh ; and it would be impossible to use the same quantity of yellow as gold, either as a ground, or in combination with other colours. (See p. 107.) 1. Gold and green pleasing harmony. 2. Gold and blue pleasing harmony. 3. Gold and crimson rich harmony. 4. Gold and purple rich harmony. 5. Gold and scarlet rich harmony, but from greater analogy it is inferior to No. 3. 6. Gold and horsechesnut rich harmony. 7. Gold and lilac harmonise (as do gold and lavender). (See Lilac, A, B, C, D, Sect. XVII.) 8. Gold and black harmonise. 8a.Gold and white (see White) harmonise, but wanting. 9. Gold and yellow wanting by analogy, but light up well by night. 10. Gold and grey harmonise, but cold and wanting. 11. Gold and buff wanting by analogy. 12. Gold and drab wanting and poor. Orange. (See Blue, Yellow, Scarlet, Drab, Stone-colour.) Orange is the colour of the fruit, and of the Coreopsis Drummondii, &c. 1. Orange and black harmonise better than yellow and black. i 3 118 ON COLOUE. PAETl. la. Orange and blue. (See Blue No. 4.) 2. Orange and horsechesnut harmonise very agreeably. (See Sect XVII. Blue, B 6a, F 5.) 3. Orange and brown harmonise very agreeably, 4. Orange and purple (or red-purple) harmonise very agreeably as centre (stamens) and petals of the Jacobaa, or Senecio. 5. Orange and blue-purple (or puce) harmonise. 6. Orange and green harmonise very agreeably, as the flower and leaves of Coreopsis Drummondii. 7. Orange and white wanting, but light up well by candlelight. 8. Orange and gold harmonise by analogy, but wanting. Orange will not take the place of gold, and an orange ground is poor and dead compared to one of gold. 8a.Orange and yellow wanting by analogy. (See Yellow, No. 11.) 9. Orange and red harmonise by analogy, but wanting. 10. Orange and salmon-colour wanting by analogy. 1 1 . Orange and crimson rich ; but wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, A 4 ; E 6 ; F 2, 3.) 12. Orange and slate-colour disagreeable. 13. Orange and lilac disagreeable. 14. Orange and grey disagreeable. 15. Orange and drab wanting. 16. Orange and chesnut wanting. 17. Orange and silver wanting, but lights up at night. Silver is so seldom required for ornamentation that I do not think it neces sary to consider its combination with colours. Salmon-colour. (See Blue, Yellow, Orange, Red, Purple, Green.) Red- Orange (red-lead orange) differs very much from the yellow orange above. (In flowers, the pistil of the saffron crocus.) 1. Red-orange and black, wanting, and very inferior to yellow orange with black. 2. Red-orange and blue harmonise. 3. Red-orange and brown wanting by analogy, 4. Red-orange and purple wanting (and by analogy, if a red-purple). Bed. (See Blue, Yellow, Orange, Purpled, Black.) Red is less suited for ornamentation than scarlet, and crimson. (In flowers it is the colour of the original Verbena Melindris.) 1 a. Red and green wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, B 2 ; C 1, 8 ; E 1, 2; F 1.) When the red approaches to pink, a discord; when the red has a scarlet hue and the green is of a bright and rather yellow hue the combination is less disagreeable than when the latter is a blue-green ; and though this may be contrary §55 XVI. EED. SCAELET. 119 to theory, which requires more blue to balance the red and yellow of the scarlet, the fact is proved by experience ; thus, the flower and leaf of the scarlet geranium accord better than the same flower with the blue leaf of the Iris, or Flag. (See pp. 74, 100.) 2. Red and blue-green disagreeable. 3. Red and olive-green discord. 3a. Red and tea-green. (See Tea-green; and Crimson.) 4. Red and purple wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, C 2, 5; E3, 4;F1.) 5. Red and blue-purple wanting. 6. Red and pink-purple, or mulberry colour, wanting by analogy. 7. Red and claret-purple wanting by analogy. 8. Red and horsechesnut wanting by analogy. 8a. Red and black. (See Black.) 9. Red and white harmonise, but wanting. (See Sect. XVIII.) 10. Red and scarlet wanting by analogy. 11. Red and pink wanting by analogy. 12. Red and pink wanting by analogy. 13. Red and salmon-colour wanting by analogy. 14. Red and brown wanting by analogy. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, B 1 ; C 4 ; E 4.) 15. Red and chesnut more wanting than brown. 16. Red and canary wanting, and the red overpowers its companion. 17. Red and buff wanting, and the red overpowers the buff. 18. Red and straw-colour wanting, and the red overpowers its com panion. 1 9. Red and gold harmonise, but inferior to crimson and gold. (See Gold.) 20. Red and grey harmonise, but wanting. 21. Red and lilac-colour wanting. Cerise and lilac would be better. 22. Red and slate-colour wanting. 23. Red and drab wanting, and the red overpowers it. 24. Red and stone-colour wanting, and the stone-colour is overpowered. 25. Red and fawn-colour wanting, and the red overpowers it. Hues op Red : — Scarlet. (See Blue, Yellow, Orange, Gold, Red, Crimson, Purple, Lilac, Green, Black, White, Brown, Chesnut, Drab.) Scarlet is a colour which is seen at a very great distance (on which account it has been objected to for soldiers' uniforms); and it is better adapted from its brightness than red for ornamentatio»;-except in glass, in which translucid material the ruby colour is more effective ; and when united with blue and yellow in a glass i 4 120 ON COLOUE. Paet I. window, ruby-colour gives a brilliant and pleasing concord. (In flowers, the Tom Thumb geranium, scarlet lychnis, and corn poppy.) 1. Scarlet and green; better than red and green, and still better than crimson and green, but wanting. (See Red and Green; see Sect. XVII. Blue, A, 8, 9 ; B 2; C 1, 8, 11, 22 ; D 1, 2, 7 ; E 1, 2, 3, 7 ; F 1, 9.) 2. Scarlet and blue-green wanting and disagreeable. 3. Scarlet and olive-green discordant. 4. Scarlet and tea-green disagreeable. 5. Scarlet and purple harmonise, but wanting. (See Blue, A 7; B 7, 8, 8a, 9 ; C 2, 5, 11 ; D 3, 7, 9 ; E 1, 3, 4,' 5, 8; and'F 1, 5,7,8.) • , 6. Scarlet and blue-purple harmonise, but wanting. 7. Scarlet and claret-purple harmonise, but wanting. 8. Scarlet and horsechesnut harmonise, but wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, B 6a; C 21 ; and F 5.) 8a. Scarlet and black. (See Black.) 9. Scarlet and white harmonise, but wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, All; B 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 ; C 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 13, 22 ; D 1, 2, 3, 5 ; E 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 ; and F 1, 8, 9, and see Sect. XVIII.) 10. Scarlet and crimson harmonise, but wanting by analogy. 11. Scarlet and pink harmonise, but wanting by analogy. 12. Scarlet and brown wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, D 5 ; E 4, 5,7; F 8, 9.) 13. Scarlet and chesnut wanting by analogy. 14. Scarlet and orange harmonise, but wanting by analogy. 14a. Scarlet and yellow. (See Yellow.) 15. Scarlet and canary wanting and poor, and the scarlet over powers it. 16. Scarlet and buff wanting and poor, and the scarlet overpowers it. 17. Scarlet and straw-colour wanting and poor, and the scarlet over powers it. 17a. Scarlet and gold. (See Gold.) 18. Scarlet and grey harmonise, but wanting. 1 9. Scarlet and lilac wanting. 20. Scarlet and slate-colour wanting. 20a. Scarlet and drab wanting. (See Drab.) 21. Scarlet and stone-colour wanting. 22. Scarlet and fawn-colour wanting. Red-lead-colour has nearly the same conditions as scarlet, and as red- orange. Crimson. (See Yellow, Canary, Gold, Orange, Buff, Red, Scarlet, Lilac, §55 XVL CEIMSON. CEEISE. PINK. 121 Green, Black, White, Brown, Chesnut, Drab.) Crimson com bines less pleasingly than scarlet with most colours ; but is useful when great richness is required. (In flowers, inside of cactus speciocissimus.) 1. Crimson and blue harmonise, but wanting ; and they do not com bine so well as blue and scarlet ; they want yellow. 2. Crimson and purple wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, A 7a; B 6b ; C 9a; D 4 ; E 8 ; F 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.) 3. Crimson and blue-purple wanting. 4. Crimson and horsechesnut wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, B 6a ; C 21 ; D 5 ; F 4, 5.) 5. Crimson and slate-colour harmonise, but the crimson overpowers it. 6. Crimson and pjnk wanting by analogy. 7. Crimson and peach wanting by analogy, and the crimson over powers it. 8. Crimson and tea-green wanting, and the crimson overpowers it. Cerise and tea-green are preferable. (See Tea-green.) 9. Crimson and olive-green discordant. 10. Crimson and grey wanting. Red-crimson. Red-crimson and orange harmonise, and are a rich con cord, as' the petals and anthers of the crimson (or old damask) rose. Brown-crimson, Pinh-crimson, Purple-crimson, Blue-crimson (or Groseille), are seldom used in combination with other colours for orna mentation, for which they are less suited than for dresses. Cerise. (See Red, Crimson, Tea-green, Slate-colour.) 1. Cerise and scarlet wanting by analogy. 2. Cerise and blue wanting. 2a. Cerise and lilac harmonise. (See Lilac.) Pink is an intractable colour for combination. It looks better alone ; but, like peach-colour, it may be used sometimes with others in patterns. Perhaps black combines with it better than any other colour, as black lace on a lady's pink dress. A dark purple may also be used instead of black. Pink is suited to young people without any attempt to combine it with other colours. (See p. 106.) 1 . Rose-colour ; 2. Deep Rose-colour. The same conditions apply to rose- colour as to pink. There is, however, a difference in the com bination with green, which, unbearable with pink, may be tolerated with rose-colour ; though rarely, except in the case 122 ON COLOUR Paet I. of rose-coloured flowers (as roses, camelias, &c.) with green leaves ; but these leaves when of a yellowish tinge (like ferns) are better than of bluish -green. No. 2 is better suited to com bine with green than No. 1. But of colours in flowers, see pp. 19, 100, 106. Peach-colour — properly that of the peach blossom, but conventionally applied to another colour, to a lilac-purple. A delicate colour, not well suited for combination, and better alone, like pink. There are some cases where it may come in well among a number of secondary and other colours, as in glass windows, carpets, &c., but sparingly. (See Blue, Yellow.) It has much the same conditions as light pink. Purple. (See Blue, Yellow, Gold, Orange, Red, Crimson, Black, White.) 1. Purple and gold; rich harmony. la.Purple and yellow harmonise. (See above, Yellow ; and see Blue in Sect. XVII. A 26 ; B 8, 18 ; C 2, 5, 9a, 16, 18, 19, 21; D 3, 4, 7, 9 ; E 1, 4, 8 ; F 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8.) 2. Purple and scarlet harmonise, but wanting. (See Blue in Sect. XVII. A 7 ; B 7, 8, 8a, 9; C 2, 5, 11, 21 ; D 3, 7, 9 ; E 1, 3, 4, 8 ; F 1, 8.) 3. Purple and blue-purple wanting by analogy. 4. Purple and maroon wanting by analogy. 5. Purple and lilac wanting by analogy. 6. Purple and slate-colour wanting by analogy. 7. Purple and pink wanting by analogy, and the pink overpowered by it. 8. Purple and peach-colour wanting by analogy, and the peach- colour overpowered by it. 9. Purple and grey poor and wanting. 10. Purple and brown wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, C 16, 18 ; E 4 ; F 7, 8.) 11. Purple and chesnut wanting and disagreeable. 12. Purple and horsechesnut, wanting and disagreeable. 13. Purple and drab wanting, and the drab overpowered by it. 14. Purple and stone-colour wanting and poor, and the stone-colour overpowered by it. 15. Purple and green the worst kind of discord.* 16. Purple and citrine discord. (See Plate m. fig. 9.) Blue-purple, generally called Puce, but more properly Damson-colour. * This applies to all purples and greens. §55 XVI. PURPLE. LILAC. 123 (See Blue, Yellow, Orange, Red, Crimson, Purple-slate, Blue- green, Black, White, Grey, Brown, Chesnut, Drab, Stone-colour.) 1. Blue-purple and gold harmonise. 2. Blue-purple and scarlet harmonise, but wanting. 3. Blue-purple and lilac wanting by analogy. 4. Blue-purple and buff wanting. 5. Blue-purple and horsechesnut wanting. 6. Blue-purple and chesnut wanting. 7. Blue-purple and canary wanting and cold. 8. Blue-purple and green discord. Pink-purple, or Red-purple, or Mulberry-colour. 1. Mulberry-colour and blue wanting. 2. Mulberry- colour and orange harmonise (with yellow rather cold). 3. Mulberry-colour and gold rich harmony. 4. Mulberry-colour and green discord. Claret-purple. 1. Claret-purple and gold rich harmony. 2. Claret-purple and orange harmonise. 3. Claret-purple and yellow wanting, the yellow is too cold. 4. Claret-purple and blue wanting by analogy. 5. Claret-purple and red wanting by analogy. 6. Claret-purple and black wanting. 7. Claret-purple and green discord. Brown claret -purple, or Maroon (properly chesnut, Marron, but changed by custom.) — Mr. Field says maron or marrone " is com posed of black and red, or black and purple, or black and russet, or with black and any other denomination of pigments in which red predominates." Maroon has nearly the same conditions as the two last. Lilac. (See Blue, Yellow, Orange, Buff, Gold, Purple, Blue-purple, Slate, Blue-green, Black, White, Grey, Brown, Chesnut, Drab, Stone- colour.) 1. Lilac and gold harmonise. (See Gold; and see Lilac in Sect. XVII.) 2. Lilac and canary poor. 3. Lilac and straw-colour poor. 4. Lilac and scarlet harmonise, but lilac is better with cerise. 5. Lilac and cerise harmonise. 6. Lilac and crimson harmonise, but overpowered by the crimson. 7. Lilac and horsechesnut (or brown) wanting. 8. Lilac and green discord. 124 ON COLOUE. Paet I. I,avender follows nearly the same conditions as Lilac. Slate-colour. (See Yellow, Orange, Buff, Red, Purple, Green, White, Brown, Chesnut.) It is a heavy colour, inferior to lavender and lilac. 1. Slate-colour and black harmonise. 2. Slate- colour and cerise harmonise. 3. Slate-colour and scarlet harmonise. 4. Slate-colour and gold harmonise. 5. Slate-colour and crimson harmonise, but overpowered by the crimson. 6. Slate-colour and blue wanting by analogy. 7. Slate-colour and blue-purple wanting by analogy. 8. Slate-colour and lilac wanting by analogy. 9. Slate-colour and grey- wanting by analogy. 10. Slate-colour and drab poor and wanting. 11. Slate-colour and stone-colour wanting. 12. Slate-colour and green discord. Evening Primrose (Primula) has conditions very similar to peach-colour. Green. (Bright green.) By green, it should be understood that I mean a bright hue, partaking of emerald, moss, verdigris, or a full grass- green (see pp. 87, 88), and not any of those blue-greens, olive- greens, and others, too often combined with other colours. (See pp. 74, 100.) See Blue, Yellow, Gold, Orange, Red, Crimson, Purple, Blue-purple, Lilac, White ; see also various combinations of Green in Blue, Sect. XVII. A, B, C, D, E, F.) 1. Green and blue-green wanting by analogy. la. Green and gold a rich harmony. (See Gold.) 2. Green and straw-colour wanting. 3. Green and canary-colour wanting. 4. Green and buff wanting. 5. Green and red wanting and disagreeable. (See p. 102.) 6. Green and scarlet wanting ; but not discordant, as green is with crimson. 7. Green and slate-colour disagreeable and discordant. 8. Green and black do not combine well, each spoiling the effect of the other. 9. Green and grey disagreeable. 10. Green and brown wanting and discordant. lOa.Green and horsechesnut wanting and discordant. 11. Green and chesnut wanting and discordant. §55 XVI. GREEN. TEETIAEIES. 125 12. Green and chocolate-colour discordant. 13. Green and drab disagreeable. 14. Green and stone-colour disagreeable. 15. Green and fawn-colour disagreeable and discordant. 16. Green and plum-colour discord. 17. Green and pink discord. 18. Green and crimson discord. 19. Green and peach discord. 20. Green and purple discord. , 21. Green and grey wanting and disagreeable. 22. Green and russet discord. (See Plate m. fig. 10.) Hues or Gbeen : — Dark Blue-green. (See Canary, Red, White.) 1. Blue-green and orange wanting. 2. Blue-green and yellow wanting and harsh. 3. Blue-green and blue wanting by analogy, and disagreeable. 4. Blue-green and scarlet wanting. 5. Blue-green and pink discord. 6. Blue-green and crimson discord. 7. Blue-green and buff disagreeable. 8. Blue-green and purple discord. 9. Blue-green and lilac discord. 10. Blue-green and slate-colour discord. Other hues of green, as rifle-green *, pea, parrot, olive, sea, apple; leek, sap, and others, are little used for ornamentation, except in particular cases, I shall therefore only notice tea-green. Tea-green. (See Scarlet, Crimson, Green.) See p. 97. 1 . Tea-green and cerise ; almost the only agreeable combination with tea-green ; and then the latter should be a ground. Tea-green is one of those colours which looks better alone. 2. Tea-green and red discordant, and overpowered by the red. 3. Tea-green and scarlet disagreeable. 4. Tea-green and blue wanting. 5. Tea-green and yellow wanting. Russet, Citrine, Olive (the three tertiaries), are of little importance in combination with other colours. There are few with which * Rifle-green may serve as a ground for some draperies, but is too heavy for general use in ornamentation. It has been properly objected to for the uniform of riflemen, being seen at a great distance, when it looks black ; grey would of course be better suited for that purpose. 126 ' ON COLOUR. Paei I. they could be united for decorative purposes ; and I have al ready shown (pp. 92, 93) how badly they accord with the primary and their accidental secondary colours. Black. (See Blue, Yellow, Canary, Gold, Orange, Pink, Slate-colour, Green, Grey, Brown, Chesnut; see various combinations with black, under Blue, Red, Black, in Sect. XVII.) 1. Black and white harmonise by contrast. They give each other their full power when in juxtaposition — the black looks blacker, and the white whiter ; but they are rather cold and harsh when without any other colour. la. Black and blue. (See Blue.) lb. Black and yellow harmonise ; they are also a strong contrast, and set off each other (see Yellow), though not to -the same degree as black and white. lc. Black and orange. (See Orange.) 2. Black and buff harmonise, but the black overpowers its companion. 3. Black and straw-colour harmonise, but the black is overpowering. 4. Black and red injure each other's effect, the black assuming a rusty tinge, and the red being dullened. (See Sect. XVI. Black; Red; and White; and above, p. 102.) 5. Black and scarlet harmonise, but wanting. 6. Black and crimson harmonise, but wanting and rather heavy; black looks better with cerise. 7. Black and purple harmonise, but wanting and gloomy. 8. Black and blue-purple harmonise, but wanting and gloomy. 9. Black and lilac, or black and lavender-colour, harmonise. 10. Black and pink-purple or mulberry harmonise, but wanting and gloomy. 11. Black and horsechesnut harmonise, but wanting and gloomy. 12. Black and drab harmonise, and look well, though the black is rather overpowering. 13. Black and stone-colour wanting. 14. Black and peach wanting and disagreeable. A black border to grey, or to drab, or to a blue-grey, is harmonious. Grey. (See Blue, Yellow, Gold, Orange, Red, Crimson, Purple, White, Brown, Chesnut.) 1. Grey and scarlet harmonise, but wanting. 2. Grey and blue-purple wanting. 3. Grey and lilac wanting by analogy. 4. Grey and black wanting by analogy. 5. Grey and drab wanting. 6. Grey and stone- colour wanting. §55 XVI. BLACK. GEEY. WHITE. BEOWN. 127 7. Grey and canary wanting. 8. Grey and buff wanting. Grey is a very good ground for other colours. White. (See Blue, Shy-blue, Yellow, Orange, Red, Black; and see Sect. XVII. Blue, A 10, 11 ; B 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 ; C 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 20 ; D 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 ; E 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ; F 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 ; and Black ; and White.) 1. White and gold harmonise, but wanting by daylight, except when gold is used to pick out the pattern upon white ; they light up well together by candlelight. 2. White and red. (See above, Red, 9.) 3. White and scarlet harmonise, but white overpowered by the scarlet, except when in much smaller quantity. 4. White and crimson harmonise, but white overpowered by the crimson, except when in much smallar quantity. 5. White and brown harmonise, but white overpowered by the brown, except when in much smaller quantity. 6. White and chocolate-colour harmonise, but white overpowered by the chocolate-colour, except when in much smaller quantity. 7. White and purple wanting, and white overpowered by the purple, except when in much smaller quantity. 8. White and blue-purple wanting, and white overpowered by the blue-purple, except when in much smaller quantity. 9. White and lilac wanting and poor. 10. White and slate-colour wanting and poor. 1 1. White and green wanting, cold, and poor. 12. White and blue-green wanting and disagreeable. 13. White and olive-green wanting and disagreeable. 14. White and tea-green wanting and disagreeable. 15. White and canary wanting. 16. White and straw wanting. 17. White and buff wanting. 18. White and grey wanting. 19. White and brown wanting. 20. White and chesnut wanting. 21. White and drab wanting and poor. 22. White and stone-colour wanting. Blown. (See Blue, Yellow, Orange, Red, Purple, Green, White.') 1. Brown and gold harmonise well. 2. Brown and crimson harmonise, but wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, D 6 ; E 6, 7 ; F 2, 6, 7.) 128 ON COLOUE. pAM L 3. Brown and scarlet wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, B 1 • C 4 • D 5 ; E 4, 5, 7 ; F 8, 9.) 4. Brown and purple wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, C 16, 18 ¦ E 4, 5 ; F 6, 7, 8.) 5. Brown and lilac wanting and disagreeable. 6. Brown and black wanting. (See Sect. XVII. Blue, D 5 6 - E 4, 5, 6, 7 ; F 2, 6, 8, 9.) 7. Brown and grey wanting. 8. Brown and chesnut wanting by analogy. 9. Brown and buff wanting and poor. 10. Brown and drab wanting and poor. 11. Brown and silver wanting. Red-brown. (Chocolate follows much the same rules as Red-brown.) 1 . Red-brown and gold harmonise well. 2. Red-brown and black harmonise. 3. Red-brown and blue harmonise. 4. Red-brown and yellow wanting. 5. Red-brown and orange harmonise, but wanting. 6. Red-brown and lilac wanting. 7. Red-brown and red wanting by analogy. 8. Red-brown and stone-colour wanting. 9. Red-brown and drab wanting by analogy, and drab overcome by the red-brown. 10. Red-brown and green discord. Horsechesnut, which is a richer kind of Red-brown, harmonises well with amber-colour, and many others. (See Blue, Yellow, Gold, Orange, Red, Scarlet, Crimson, Purple, Lilac, Green, Black. See Sect. XVII. Blue, B 6a ; C 21 ; E 4, 5 ; F 4, 5.) Chesnut. (See Blue, Yellow, Orange, Red, Purple, Green, Black, White, Broivn.) 1. Chesnut and gold harmonise. 2. Chesnut and crimson wanting. 3. Chesnut and scarlet wanting. 4. Chesnut and purple wanting. 5. Chesnut and blue-purple wanting. 6. Chesnut and lilac wanting. 7. Chesnut and grey wanting. 8. Chesnut and stone-colour wanting. 9. Chesnut and drab wanting. Drab. (See Blue, Yellow, Orange, Red, Purple, Green, Black, White, Brown.) 1. Drab and scarlet harmonise, but drab overpowered by the scarlet. § 55 XVII. UNION OF THBEE COLOURS. 129 2. Drab and crimson harmonise, but drab overpowered by the crimson. 3. Drab and blue-purple harmonise, but drab overpowered by the purple, and not agreeable. 4. Drab and lilac disagreeable. 5. Drab and orange wanting. 6. Drab and yellow wanting. 7. Drab and buff wanting. Stone-colour. (See Blue, Red, Purple, Slate, Green, Black, White, Chesnut.) 1. Stone-colour and yellow wanting. 2. Stone-colour and orange wanting. 3. Stone- colour and buff wanting. 4. Stone-colour and blue-purpJe wanting. 5. Stone-colour and lilac wanting. 6. Stone-colour and brown wanting. 7. Stone-colour and drab wanting. Fawn-colour. 1. Fawn-colour and blue harmonise, but wanting, and fawn-colour overpowered by its companion. 2. Fawn-colour and brown wanting, and fawn-colour overpowered by its companion. 3. Fawn-colour and purple wanting, and fawn-colour overpowered by its companion. 4. Fawn-colour and pink wanting and poor. XVII. Combinations of three or more Colours. — As in the case of two colours in juxtaposition I place together three or more, without reference to the exact quantity of each; though this, as well as their arrangement, is a very impor tant consideration in a coloured design. But as it is not my object here to enter into these questions, which would require full illustrations of each combination, I must confine myself as before to the mention of their general agreement, and refer to Sects. XVIII. XIX. for a few remarks on their quantity and arrangement. It is to be borne in mind, that when colours harmonise, it is not sufficient that they should be placed together without regard to proper order, nor should they always be placed in the same relative positions. Thus, the white, or the yellow, or the black, may sometimes be K 130 ON COLOUR. Pabi I. repeated between each as a ground; and others may have one colour at one time, and a different one at another, next to them. There are also many cases where two colours, which do not accord well in juxtaposition when no others are put with them, may be made to accord by the introduction of one or two more ; and even positive discords may be recon ciled by the same means. (See Sect. XX.) I have mentioned in Sect. XVI. p. 113, some of those colours which arranged in twos, or with one other, offer the most pleasing concords ; and I shall now point out some of those which produce the most harmonious combinations with two or more companions. 1. Blue and red (or scarlet or crimson) and yellow (or gold). (See below, Blue, A 1 and 2.) 2. Blue and scarlet and purple and yellow (or orange, or gold) and black. (C5.) 3. Blue and scarlet and yellow (or orange, or gold) with a small quantity of (bright) green. (B 2.) 4. Blue and scarlet and gold and white. (B 5.) 5. Blue and scarlet and white and purple and yellow (or rather gold or orange). (C 2.) 6. Blue and yellow and scarlet and white and black and orange and green. (E 2.) 7. Orange and blue and green and white and black. (C 9.) 8. Crimson (or scarlet) and yellow and blue and white and black. (C 10 ; see Black, C 1.) 9. Blue and yellow (or orange) and purple and scarlet (or crimson) and white arid black. (D 3.) 10. Blue and scarlet and green and yellow (or orange or gold) and black and white. (See Black, D 3.) 11. Purple and scarlet and gold. (See Purple, A 1 ; C 1 and E.) The orange here mentioned is a yellow, not a red, orange. Where scarlet is used instead of crimson, the quantity of yellow must be lessened ; and where yellow is used instead of orange, it must also be in smaller quantity. Green too must always be in much smaller proportion than the other §55 XVII. BLUE, THREE COLOURS." 131 colours combined with it, and of a bright hue. (See p. 16.) Dark greens are only to be used in very exceptional cases, as accessories, or in particular positions. In the following lists I have only catalogued the colours, statmg their effect when combined; their arrangement will depend on the design; and the agreement of each colour with another in contact with it, will be seen in the lists in Sect. XVI. Blue. (See Yellow, Orange, Purple, Black, White, Grey.) A (3 colours). 1. Blue and red and yellow harmonise, if in proper proportion ; but there are other more agreeable combinations with a greater number of colours, as C 5, E 1, and in these three gold is much richer than yellow for ornamentation. 2. Blue and scarlet and yellow harmonise well. (See PI. iv. fig. 1.) 3. Blue and crimson and yellow harmonise well. 4. Blue and crimson and orange harmonise well. 5. Blue and crimson and gold harmonise well ; very rich in furniture. 6. Blue and crimson and scarlet harmonise, but wanting by analogy of the last two. (See C 12 ; F 5.) 7. Blue and scarlet and purple harmonise, but wanting by analogy. (See B 7 and C 5, 11, 21 ; D 3, 7, 9 ; E 1, 3, 4, 5, 8; and F 1, 5, 7, 8.) They were the three colours used by the Israelites. (Ex. xxv. 4 ; xxxvi. 12.) They were apparently on a white linen ground, and had gold "tashes," and gold thread worked in. 7a. Blue and crimson and purple harmonise, but wanting. (See B 6 b ; C 9a; D, 4, 9, 10 ; E 8 ; F 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.) 8. Blue and scarlet and green harmonise, but wanting, and the quan tity of the green should be very small ; they want yellow or orange. (See B 2, 10; C 1, 8, 11, 12, (22) ; D 1, 2, 7; El, 2, 3, 7; and F 1, 9. I rarely refer to those which do not accord.) 9. Blue and crimson and green wanting, not agreeable, and still less so if on a black ground : they would be improved by orange ; or by black and yellow ; or by scarlet and yellow. (See C 12 ; D 8 ; E 7 ; F 2, 3.) 10. Blue and red and white harmonise, but cold. 11. Blue and scarlet and white harmonise. 12. Blue and red and black wanting and dull ; they require yellow or orange. 13. Blue and red (or scarlet) and orange harmonise, but wanting; the k 2 132 ON COLOUR. , Paet I. blue overbalanced by the other two ; they would be better with the addition of black. 14. Blue and white and orange wanting. Red should be added, and they would be improved by being on a black ground. 15. Blue and white and yellow wanting. They require a red. 16. Blue white and green wanting and cold. They require a red. (See below, C 1, 3.) 17. Blue and white and black wanting and cold. Improved by adding red or scarlet, or yellow or orang-e. Blue and black are har monious, but the addition of white destroys the balance of colour. (See B 4, 5, 6.) 18. Blue and white and grey wanting, and cold. Want red, or red and yellow, or red and orange. 19. Blue and black and crimson wanting. They require orange, or yellow. (See also D 6, 8, 9, 10 ; E 7 ; F 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.) 20. Blue and black and yellow harmonise, but wanting and cold. 2 1 . Blue and black and orange harmonise ; and better than with yellow. 22. Blue and black and lilac wanting and dull. (See Lilac C 2, and D.) 23. Blue and black and purple wanting and dull. (See Purple, C 1 ; D and E.) , 24. Blue and black and green wanting and poor. 25. Blue and yellow and green wanting. 26. Blue and yellow and purple wanting and disagreeable. (See Blue, C 2; D 3,4; E 1,4; F 1,5, 6, 7, 8.) 27. Blue and orange and purple wanting. (See Blue, C 2, 11 ; D 4, 9 ; E 1, 3, 5 ; F 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8.) 28. Blue and orange and olive-green discordant. (See PI. in. fig. 7, and p. 92.) 29. Blue and orange and green harmonise, if the blue is in full propor tion for the other two; but they would be better with the addition of black. 30. Blue and purple and green discord. 31. Blue and pink and green discord. B (4 colours). 1. Blue and red (or scarlet) and yellow and brown harmonise but poor. 2. Blue and red, or rather scarlet, and a small proportion of green and yellow (or orange or gold) harmonise well. The Egyptians used these with fillets of yellow. (-See PI. in. fig. 2 ; Plate rv. fig. 3.) 3. Blue and red (or scarlet) and black and yellow, or gold, (or on a gold ground) harmonise. §55 XVII. BLUE, FOUR AND FIVE COLOURS. 133 4. Blue and red (or scarlet) and black and white harmonise, but rather cold from the cold colours predominating. 5. Blue and red (or scarlet) and white and gold harmonise well if properly arranged, the white being in small quantity. 6. Blue and red (or scarlet) and white and yellow harmonise ; but not so well as with gold instead of yellow. (See PI. rv. fig. 4.) 6a. Blue and horsechesnut and scarlet (or crimson) and orange (or yellow) harmonise. 6b. Blue and crimson and purple and orange harmonise. This is better than with yellow. It would be preferable with scarlet than with crimson. 7. Blue and scarlet and purple and gold harmonise well. (See Plate in. fig. 4.) They were used for the Ephod (Ex. xxviii. 15), the robe being blue, with a border of these colours. 8. Blue and scarlet and purple and yellow harmonise, but less well than gold. 8a. Blue and scarlet and purple and orange harmonise. 9. Blue and scarlet and purple and white harmonise, but less well than with orange, or gold. 9a. Blue and scarlet and orange (or gold) and maroon (or on a maroon ground) harmonise. 10. Blue and scarlet and green and white harmonise, but wanting. 11. Blue and crimson and green and white wanting and disagreeable. No. 2 is preferable. 12. Blue and black and white and yellow (or gold) harmonise, but wanting and cold. 13. Blue and black and white and purple (or lilac) wanting. 14. Blue and black and white and crimson wanting — want yellow or gold. 15. Blue and black and yellow and crimson harmonise, but heavy; better with scarlet. 16. Blue and black and white and grey (or on a black ground) wanting and cold. 17. Blue and black and white and orange harmonise. 18. Blue and yellow and purple and orange harmonise, but wanting. 19. Blue and yellow and brown and green wanting and discordant. 20. Blue and green and red with black lines between them heavy. 21. Blue and green and red and white harmonise, but wanting. C (5 colours). 1. Blue and red (or scarlet) and white and green and yellow (or rather gold* or orange) harmonise. * It is scarcely necessary to add that gold may generally take the place of orange or of yellow, and is almost always superior in effect to them. 134 ON COLOUE. Past i. 2. Blue and red (or scarlet) and white and purple and yellow, or rather gold or orange harmonise well. (See PI. in. fig. 1 1 ; and A7;B7.) 3. Blue and red (or scarlet) and green and yellow (or gold) on a white ground harmonise. 4. Blue and red (or scarlet) and yellow (or gold) and brown and white harmonise. 5. Blue and red (or scarlet) and yellow (or orange or gold-) and purple and black harmonise well. (See PL iv. fig. 2.) 6. Blue and red (or scarlet) and orange and chesnut and white har monise. 7. Blue and red (or scarlet) and yellow (or rather gold or orange) and black and white harmonise, and are better than the three primaries alone, but they could be improved still farther by a little green. (See p. Ill, and PI. iv. fig. 5.) 8. Blue and scarlet (or red) and a little green and yellow and black harmonise, but wanting. This was also an Egyptian combi nation. 9. Blue and orange and green and black and white (or on a white ground) harmonise, and have an agreeable effect, as in some of the tiles at the Alhambra. This also shows that combina tions may even be made without any positive red or scarlet, and the small quantity in the orange is sufficient, as in that most harmonious combination — blue and orange. (See PI. in. figs. 1,12.) 9a. Blue and orange (or yellow) and crimson and black and purple harmonise, but dull and wanting. (See D 10 ; F 3, 4, 5, 6.) 10. Blue and crimson and yellow and black and white harmonise well. 11. Blue and orange (or gold) and green and purple and scarlet har monise. 12. Blue and crimson and green and yellow and scarlet harmonise. 13. Blue and crimson and yellow and white and scarlet harmonise. 14. Blue and orange and black and purple and white (or on a white ground) wanting. (See D 10 ; E 3, 5, 8 ; F 1, 3, 4, 6, 8.) 15. Blue and orange and brown and yellow and white wanting. 16. Blue and orange and brown and yellow and purple wanting. 17. Blue and crimson and yellow and green and white unsatisfactory. It would be better without green, with scarlet instead of crimson, and wants black. - 18. Blue and yellow and green and purple and brown discord. 19. Blue and yellow and green and purple and white disagreeable. 20. Blue and green and purple and white and orange wanting, and depending much on the proportions and arrangement of the §55 XVII. BLUE, SIX AND SEVEN COLOURS. . 135 colours. In these the blue should be in greater quantity than any one of the others; as in other combinations. 21. Blue and horsechesnut and scarlet (or crimson) and orange (or yellow) and purple harmonise. 22. Blue and white and scarlet and yellow and green wanting and poor. 23. Blue and white and black and yellow (or orange) and scarlet harmonise. D (6 colours). 1. Blue and scarlet and green and yellow and black and white har monise. (See PI. v. fig. 1.) 2. Blue and scarlet and green and orange (or rather gold) and black and white harmonise. (See PI. i.) 3. Blue and scarlet and yellow (or orange or gold) and purple and black and white harmonise well. 4. Blue and crimson and yellow (or orange or gold) and purple and black and white harmonise. 5. Blue and scarlet and yellow (or orange or gold) and black and white and brown (or chesnut) harmonise. 6. Blue and crimson and yellow (or orange or gold) and black and white and brown (or horsechesnut, or chesnut) harmonise, but better with scarlet. 7. Blue and scarlet and yellow (or orange or gold) and green and black and purple harmonise, not agreeably, better without green. (See C 5.) 8. Blue and crimson and yellow (or orange or gold) and green and black and white harmonise, but better with scarlet. 9. Blue and scarlet (or crimson or red) and orange and purple and black and a little yellow harmonise. 10. Blue and crimson and orange (or gold) and purple and black and white harmonise, but wanting. (ut wanting. (See below, CI.) 138 ON COLOUR. Paet j 2. Orange and green and blue and scarlet harmonise. (See above Al.) C (5 colours). 1. Orange and drab and blue and scarlet and black harmonise. 2. Orange and blue and scarlet and black and white harmonise * (See Blue, D 2 ; E 2, 3, 5, 8 ; F 1, 8, 9.) 3. Orange and blue and crimson and white and purple harmonise (See Blue, D 10 ; F 3, 6.) For other combinations with orange, see Blue. The lighter hues, as canary, straw, lemon-colour, buff, &c. need not be mentioned in combination with other colours, as they are of inferior power, and can only be used as accessories in compositions which are too numerous to ffe specified. Red. (See Blue, Yellow, Grey.) Combinations with scarlet are prefer able to those with red. (See Scarlet.) A (3 colours). 1. Red and green and orange (or gold) harmonise, but wanting. 2. Red and green and yellow wanting and poor. 3. Red and black and orange (or gold) wanting. 4. Red and purple and yellow wanting. 5. Red and purple and orange wanting. 6. Red and black and white wanting. The bad effect produced by black on red, and red on black, is partly removed by the black and white contrasting and giving to each other their full power. The same may be said of black and scarlet and white ; and by substituting black for blue in our union jack, the heavy effect of these three colours is very evident. 7. Red and black and green wanting. The black looks of a rusty hue, and disagreeable. 8. Red and black and pink wanting and disagreeable. 9. Red and white and pink wanting and poor and cold. The white is overpowered; 10. Red and black and yellow (or orange) wanting ; requires blue. 1 1 . Red and black and gold harmonise, but rather heavy, and wanting. 12. Red and brown and green wanting and disagreeable. 13. Red and buff and green wanting and disagreeable. 14. Red and green and russet discord. (See PL in. fig. 6.) * In all combinations a larger proportion of blue than of any other colour is of course required, but in these the quantity of blue must be increased still more, in order to balance the scarlet, or the crimson, and the orange. §55XVU. RED. CRIMSON. SCARLET. 139 B (4 colours). 1. Red and black and white and gold harmonise, but wanting. 2. Red and black and white and purple (or lilac) harmonise; but wanting. 3. Red and black and yellow and brown wanting and gloomy. 4. Red and black and yellow (or gold) and purple wanting. 5. Red and green and yellow and purple wanting. 6. Red and green and yellow and white wanting and poor. 7. Red and green and yellow and black wanting. C (5 colours), 1. Red and black and green and white and yellow wanting and 2. Red and green and white and yellow and buff wanting, poor, and disagreeable — as in the mosaics of San Bartolomeo nell' Isola del Tevere, Rome. (See No. 4, Mr.DigbyWyatt's Mosaics.) D (6 colours). 1. Red and black and white and green and purple on gold ground wanting and poor. 2. Red and purple (or lilac) and scarlet and yellow and black and white wanting — not sufficient contrast. Crimson. (See Blue, Yellow, Orange, Black, White, Grey.) A (3 colours). 1. Crimson and purple and orange wanting. (See Blue, B 6 b ; C 9a ; D 4, 9 ; E 8 ; F 3, 5, 6, 7.) 2. Crimson and yellow and brown wanting. (See Blue, D 6 ; E 6, 7 ; F2,6.) 3. Crimson and purple and green discord. (See Blue, F 3.) B (4 colours). 1. Crimson and orange and black and white wanting. (See Blue, E 8 ; F 2, 3, 4, 6.) Scarlet. (See Blue, Red, Yellow, Black, White, Grey.) A (3 colours). 1. Scarlet and blue and orange harmonise, but wanting, scarlet and orange being too much for the blue. (See Blue, B 2 ; C 1 2 3,5,6,7,11,21,23; D 2, 3, S, 6, 7, 8, 9; E 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 ; F 1, 5, 8, 9.) la. Scarlet and blue and yellow. (See Blue.) I"10 ON COLOUR.. PamI. 2. Scarlet and green and yellow wanting. (See Blue, B 2 • C 1 3 8, 12, 17, 22; D 1, 7, 8 ; E 1, 2, 7; F 1, 9.) 3. Scarlet and orange and black (see below, 9) wanting. (See Blue C5, 7, 23; D 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9; E 2, 3, 5, 8 ; F 1, 5, 8, 9.) 4. Scarlet and orange and purple wanting. (See Blue, B 8 a ; C 5 11, 21 ; D 3, 7, 9 ; E 1 , 3, 5, 8 ; F 1, 3, 8.) 5. Scarlet and yellow and purple wanting. (See Blue, B 8 ; C 2 5 21 ; D 3, 7, 9 ; E 1, 4, 8 ; F 1, 8.) 6. Scarlet and black and white wanting. It is not quite as bad as red and black and white (See Red, A 6.) (See Blue, B 4 ; C 7, 23; DI, 2,3, 5; E 2, 3, 4, 5,7, 8;Fl, 8, 9.) 7. Scarlet and black and green wanting. (See Red, A 7; Blue, C 8 ; D 1,2, 7; E 2,3, 7; F 1,9.) 8. Scarlet and blaok**it»a nink vanting and disagreeable. 9. Scarlet and bl' - wanting. (See Blue, B 3 ; C 5, 7, 8;D1, 3, ";P1, 8, 9.) 10. Scarlet and ' . mise, but wanting. (See Blue, B 3 ; C 5, , 'V'5, 11. Scarlet and bro ;ing and disagreeable- (See Blue, E7; F 9.) _ yi 12. Scarlet and buff and green, ;pj,. ing and disagreeable. B (4 colours). 1. Scarlet and black and white and gold wanting. (See Blue, D 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 ; E 1, 8.) 2. Scarlet and black and white and purple wanting. (See Blue, D 3 ; and E 3, 4, 5, 8 ; F 1, 8.) 3. Scarlet and black and yellow and brown wanting. (See Blue, D 5, 6 ; E 4, 7 ; F 8, 9.) 4. Scarlet and black and yellow and purple wanting. (See Blue, C5;D3, 7,9;E4, 8;F1,8.) 5. Scarlet and black arid orange and purple wanting. (See Blue, C 5 ; D 3, 7, 9 ; E 3, 5, 8 ; F 1, 8.) 6. Scarlet and green and yellow and purple wanting. (See Blue, D 7 ; E 1 ; F 1.) 7. Scarlet and green and yellow and white wanting and poor. (See Blue, C 1, 3 ; D 1, 8 ; E 1, 2, 7 ; F 1, 9.) 8. Scarlet and green and yellow and black wanting. (See Blue, C8; D 1,7,8; E 2,7; F 1,9.) C (5 colours). 1. Scarlet and black and green and white and yellow wanting and disagreeable. 2. Scarlet and black and white and purple and yellow wanting (better with orange for yellow). §55 XVII. PURPLE, THREE TO SEVEN COLOURS. 141 3. Scarlet and black and white and purple and orange wanting ; they require blue. D (6 colours). 1. Scarlet and black and white and green and purple and gold (or on gold ground) wanting, poor. 2. Scarlet and purple (or lilac) and crimson and yellow and black and white wanting. Purple. (See Blue, Yellow, Red, Scarlet, Crimson, Black, White, Grey.) A (3 colours). 1. Purple and scarlet and gold harmonise, a rich concord. (See Blue, B 7; C 2, 5, 11 ; D 3, 7, 9-"» 2. Purple and scarlet and orange l*«T!i*ise.'- s^See Blue, B 8a ; C 2, 5, 11 ; D 3, 7, 9 ; E 1, 3. ."'¦•"- "°5 Li •' ^. 3. Purple and scarlet and w) ' ' '¦