"i- ,r. ',. yv, 2002361773 stsa YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY /X f- 4 MXf-i-xJj: ri-Lo , / n >^f 7. fit tt&i i, , 'W. 7 1^ ^ rx; <¦ r/p ' ! £~ Cc ? ' r ^ -•' ^ /2^ ^ *¦ ^ U , - 0 I. LUTHER MARTIN. ii. NATHANIEL RAMSAY. c SfuTi^-^Publtcctliorr^ QTlo. 24. LUTHER MARTIN << THE FEDERAL BULL-DOG. >> HENRY P. GODDARD. II. A SKETCH OP THE LIFE AND CHARACTER or NATHANIEL RAMSAY, BY W. F. BRAND, D.D. JSallimors, lL6l \5_ LUTHER MARTIN. PREFACE. In the preparation of this pamphlet the published authorities consulted have been Hildreth's History of the United States; Scharf's History of Maryland, and "Chronicles of Baltimore;" The Reports of the Trials of Samuel Chase, and of Aaron Burr ; The Autobiography of Judge Taney ; The Life of Judge Story, by W. W. Story ; Kennedy's Life of Wm. Wirt ; The two Lives of Wm. Pinkney, by Wheaton and by Bishop Pinkney ; Parton's Life of Aaron Burr ; Blennerhassett's Diary ; Henry Adams' Life of John Randolph (American Statesmen Series) ; Jacobs' Life of Capt. Cresap ; The Life of Rev. Jas. Millnor, by Rev. J. S. Stone, besides the old newspapers and pamphlets of Mar tin's day in the rich library of the Maryland Historical Society. Most useful of these has been the copy of " Modern Gratitude," possessed by the Society, of which I know of but one other copy extant, that in the possession of Luther Martin McCormick, of No. 147 West Preston street, a grand-nephew of Luther Martin. This gentleman, who is the only surviving descendant of Mar tin's family, is also the owner of Pine's picture of Martin and family and of the miniatures by Peale. To him I am greatly indebted for material, as I was to his venerated father, Rev. Thos. McCormick, who died in 1883, having passed his 90th birthday. That gentleman, the late Chas. Tiernan, who died in 1886, and Hon. J. H. B. Latrobe, who still presides over the Maryland vii Vlll PREFACE. Historical Society, are the only persons I have been able to find who recall Martin, and each furnished me with reminiscences. To Judge John A. Campbell, now living in Baltimore, I am indebted for impressions of Martin, gathered by Judge Campbell from conversations with Judge Taney and John Quincy Adams. Martin's letters to Mrs. Chas. Hager were published in the defunct "Baltimore Times'' in January, 1882, by Col. J. Thos. Scharf, who has, or had them then in his possession. It is my hope at some future date to expand this pamphlet into a biography. Henry P. Goddaed. Baltimore, Md., March 26, 1887. LltTHER MARTIN: THE FEDERAL BULL-DOG. >> IN the Picture Gallery of the Maryland His torical Society at Baltimore, there hangs a large oil-painting, in which the artist, Robert Edge Pine, has portrayed a group of young people attired in the costumes Avorn by the wealthier class ,in this country in the latter part of the 18th cen tury. The group consists of husband, wife, and two little girls ; one, almost an infant, reclines in the mother's arms, while the other, a child of apparently six or seven years of age, is playing with a small dog. The lady is dressed in silk, and is looking across a smooth green lawn from the porch on which she sits, her eyes following the direction of her husband's hand, which is pointing toward a vessel coming up the harbor Of Annapolis, where the picture was painted. The man has a riding whip in the other hand, his 2 9 10 dress is of velvet, his face handsome and intelli gent. Behind the wife a colored servant watches with care the youngest child, and the whole pic ture suo-oests comfort and domestic happiness. CO ¦¦" *¦ Sometime between the years 1820-25 a rising young member of the Baltimore bar, who still practises his profession in that city of which he has long been one of the most esteemed and re spected citizens, and who has for a long series of years presided over the society in whose gallery hangs the picture just described,1 was associated with the late Roger B. Taney, afterwards the cele brated Chief Justice of the U. S., in trying a case in the U. S. District Court in session at Baltir more. William Wirt was the opposing counsel, and the court room was filled with interested auditors, when suddenly there was a little, ripple of excite ment and the crowd gave way to right and left as a grey-haired old man tottered into the room, ancl passing inside the rail seated himself as if accustomed to the place. Apparently ignoring or unconscious of the deference shown him by the lawyers present, as well as by the spectators, he seemed absorbed in munching a piece of ginger bread. The old gentleman had on well-worn knee breeches, yarn stockings, silver buckles on his shoes and ruffles on his shirt bosom and sleeves. 1 Hon. J. II. B. Lntrobo. 11 It needed but brief observation to satisfy the sur prised young lawyer that the old man was nearly bereft of mental power and had wandered into the court room, more from a feeble instinct than with any real purpose. The handsome young husband 6f Pine's picture, the centre of that happy family group, and the trembling old dotard that was seen thus aimlessly wandering into a court room Were one and the same: It is Luther Martin, with his lovely wife and fair daughters, Maria and Elinor, that we see in the picture. It is Luther Martin, for over a half century a recognized leader of the Maryland bar — a bar ever famous for its eminent members, — the man who had been leading counsel in two of the greatest trials of cases of national interest ancl importance in the history of our country, who had thus wandered, a discrowned, demented and almost friendless Lear into the arena of his old renown. Knowledge as to the early life of Luther Martin is chiefly obtained from the brief autobiographical sketch published by him in one of the later num bers of that remarkable series of pamphlets en titled "Modern Gratitude," published by him in 1801-2. Born at New Brunswick, New Jersey, in 1744, Martin — who was of English stock — was the third of nine children. In 1757 he went to a grammar school where he learned the rudiments of Latin: 12 thence to Princeton College, where he graduated in 1763 at the head of a class of thirty-five. The poverty of his parents had made it a hard task for them to send him to college, but he fully appreciated • what they had done for him in pro viding for his education, " for which," he says in " Modern Gratitude," " my heart beats toward them with a more grateful remembrance than had they bestowed on me the gold of Peru or gems of Golconda." As soon as of legal age Luther con veyed to his elder brothers, in return for their sacrifices, a small tract of land that came to him from his grandfather. Two days after graduation the lad of 19 decided on law as his calling, ancl, with a few dollars in his pocket and a few friends for company, set out for Cecil County, Maryland, with letters to a Rev. Mr. Hunt. This gentleman kindly treated him and gave him letters by aid of which Martin secured a school at Queenstown, Queen Anne's County, Mary land, where ho taught till April, 1770, living with, and using the library of, Solomon Wright, father of Robert Wright, later a United States Senator from Maryland. His means were. scanty, and he was then, as ever after, in pecuniary stress, for he was improvident by nature. He ran in debt, and when he stopped school-teaching to devote his Avhole time to law study, he was. arrested on five different warrants . of attachment. Of his peciir 13 niary difficulties at that time he says in "Modern Gratitude": "I am not even yet, I was not then, nor have I ever been an economist of anything but time." In 1771 Martin was admitted to the bar, and in 1772 vvent to Williamsburg, Virginia, where he remained during a term of court, making many Valuable friends, among them Patrick Henry. He soon began practice in Accomac ancl Northampton, Virginia, was admitted as an attorney in the courts of Worcester and Somerset Counties, Maryland, and took up his residence in Somerset. His in-> come soon reached the large sum, for that day, of 1,000 pounds per year, and was never less till the revolutionary troubles began. That in the very inception of his legal practice he displayed ability that insured success and fame therein, is evinced by the recorded fact that at one of his early terms before the Williamsburg Court he defended 38 persons of whom 29 were acquitted. In 1774 Martin was appointed one of the com missioners for his county to oppose the claims of Great Britain : also a member of the convention called at Annapolis to the same end. In this, his first appearance in the arena of politics, he at once took strong patriotic ground. About this time he published a reply to the address sent out by the Howes from their ships in Chesapeake Bay, also an address " To the inhabitants of the peninsula 14 between the Delaware river and the Chesapeake, to the southward of the British lines," which was circulated in printed hand-bills. It is to these days he alludes in " Modern Grati tude " (page 138): "Throughout which not only myself but many others did not lie down one night in our beds without the hazard of waking on board a British ship or in the other world." In 1778, by the advice of Judge Samuel Chase, Martin was appointed Attorney General of Mary land. In this position he most vigorously and rig-. orously prosecuted (almost persecuted) the Tories of his State, making thereby life-long enemies as well as warm friends, for throughout his whole life he was never neutral in anything.1 Always lavish 1 In the early Maryland Reports can be found a case which shows the bitterness with which Martin, as Attorney General, pursued all suspected of having been Tory sympathizers during the Bevolution. It is tlie case of State of Maryland vs. Samuel Johnston, tried in 178G (2 II. & Mell. 160). Mr. Johnston applied to be admitted to practice in the courts of Maryland. Martin opposed on the ground that at the outbreak of the Bevolution Jolinston had resigned certain petty offices in Pennsylvania rather than take the oaths of allegiance, and had removed to Maryland to remain "peaceable and inactive'' during the war. Johnston acknowledged this charge, but pleaded that his conscience did not permit his taking the oath referred to at the time as lie did not think himself absolved from allegiance to the king, until independence was acknowledged, although he wished well to our liberties; that his sons- in-law were colonels in our militia, two sons privates in our armies, one of whom was taken prisoner ; that now that independence was established he was perfectly attached to the government of Maryland. Although all the witnesses corroborated Mr. Jolinston and represented him as a mild, conscientious gentleman, Martin fought the case by every legal resort and did not submit until a third and final hearing, before the highest court in the State, when Mr. Johnson was decided admissible. 15 but never grasping, he very early in his official cai'eer refused a silver service tendered him for his bold prosecution of a wealthy citizen charged with the murder of an Irishman. His spare hours at this time were spent in managing a salt mine at Accomac. In 1783 Martin married Miss Crcsap of Old Town, Alleghany Co., Md., a daughter of that cele brated Capt. Michael Cresap Avho was charged by Thomas Jefferson, in his " Notes on Virginia," with the massacre of the family of the Indian chief Logan. The alleged speech, put into Logan's mouth by Jefferson, in relation to the wrong dono the Indian was until recently a favorite piece for school-boy declamation. In a life of Capt. Cresap, published at Cumberland, Md., in 1826, ! it is stated that Martin published a reply to Jefferson defending Capt. Cresap, but that it had a limited 1 The author of this life was one John J. Jacob. It is quite a readable little volume. In it the writer says, apropos of Jefferson, that he foresees the difficulty of questioning the truth of any statement made by such a man, " especially by such a, pigmy as myself, however encircled with the shield of truth, would in all probability, be as unavailing and feeble as the efforts of a musquito to demolish an ox," hence, he says, he received assur ances from Luther Martin, who had intermarried with a daughter of Capt. C. that he would undertake a defence. Confident in his ability and posi tion, "co-equal with the philosopher of Monticello," he placed the mate rials in his hands, lie adds that Martin published a, defence of Capt. C. but that it did not have a wide circulation, as " pamphlets are soon lost and party spirit ran so high that any blemish on the moral fame of Jef ferson was easily transferable to his political standing, hence it was bet ter upon the whole some men might think that Cresap, however innocent, should yet remain under censure, than that any suspicion as to the perfec tion of so great a character should rest on the public mind." 16 circulation and has disappeared. Although Jef ferson said of this pamphlet that it was of a style " that forbade the respect of an answer," the ver dict of history is pretty well established that Logan was not Avronged by Cresap, at any rate to the extent claimed in the imaginary speech ; but the feud thus created between Martin and Jefferson never ended; "as great a scoundrel as Tom Jefferson," being the severest condemnation Martin could bestow on any man. In 1787 Martin was sent by the Maryland Leg islature as one of the delegates to the convention at Philadelphia, which framed the Federal Consti tution. In the debates of that famous body he took an active part. In view of the fact that not many years after he was christened by his old antagonist, Jefferson, "the Federal Bull-Dog," it is noteworthy that his speeches in convention were in vehement opposition to the Constitution, ancl that he left the body forever with one of his col leagues and went home rather than sign the in strument. He kept up his opposition on his return to Maryland ancl laid before the Legisla ture of that State some of the ablest arguments against ratification ever made.1 A single quotation from his protest against the license allowed the African slave trade in the Con- 1 It was from Martin's arguments published at this time that John C. Calhoun was wont to draw in his nullification speeches. 17 stitution may serve to indicate the prophetic wis dom and wise statemanship of the man. " It ought to be considered that national crimes can only be, and frequently are, punished in this world by national punishments, and that the continu ance of the slave trade, ancl thus giving it a national sanction and encouragement, ought to be considered as justly exposing us to the displeasure and vengeance of Him who is equally Lord of all, ancl Who views with equal eye the poor African slave and his American master." The Madison papers confirm Martin's report of his opposition to the continuance of the. slave trade. That he was conscientious and consistent therein appears from the fact that in 1789 we find his name associated with that of his friend Judojo Chase as the two " Honorary Counsellors " of the Maryland Society for promoting the abolition of slavery, and the relief of poor negroes and others unlawfully held in bondage." It is remarkable that the next public appear ance of Luther Martin in a matter of national interest was as a staunch supporter of this very Federal Constitution, the adoption of which he had so ardently opposed, and fully as remarkable that such appearance should be as counsel for a Federal official — his warm personal friend — who had been no less bitter in his opposition to the same instrument. This appearance was as one of 3 18 the counsel for the defence in the impeachment trial of Judge Samuel Chase before the United States Senate in 1804. The occasion was a momentous one and recog nized as such by all who participated therein, as here was to be fought one of the first great battles of our national history between the advocates of diverse views as to the construction of the National Constitution, ancl the question to bo settled whether the judicial department of our government could be controlled and manipulated at the pleasure of either of the other departments. That President Jefferson instigated this trial of the most vul nerable member of the Supreme Court in order to make that body less of an obstacle to his methods of government is most probable. The Senate was presided over by Vice-PrcsiJ dent Aaron Burr, who, though he had recently slain the ablest Federalist of them all, and was out of favor with his own party for his selfish effort to push himself into the Presidential Chair designed for Jefferson by the party as a whole in the last contest, yet presided with a grace ahd fairness that Avon universal recognition. " With the dignity and impartiality of an angel, but with the rigor of a devil," said an opposition newspaper . 1 1 With that love of dramatic effect which characterized the man, the Vice- President had the Senate Chamber fitted up as a court in which the Sena tors were arranged in a semi-circle about himself as centre, with the accused, 19 Among the Senators sitting in judgment on the case was the future President, John Quincy Adams, who steadily voted in favor of the accused, and many other wearers of historic names, such as Bayard of Delaware, Breckinridge of Kentucky, Dayton of New Jersey, Giles of Virginia, Tracey of Connecticut, Pickering of Massachusetts ancl Sumpter of South Carolina. The Chief Manager of the impeachment on part of the House was John Randolph of Roanoke, then but thirty-one years of age and already the leader of the House, yet more feared than loved for his sarcastic eloquence. Hildreth (History of the United States) well comments on his speeches in this case as " tingling but desultory surface strokes." Of his five associates Cajsar Rodney of Delaware was the most notable. Around Judge Chase, who was fully able to plead his own cause yet shrewd enough to draw about him the ablest advocates of his day, there gathered as counsel his life long friend Martin,1 his counsel, the managers of the impeachment and the House, all effectively placed, while extra galleries draped in green cloth were provided for spec tators, with handsome boxes for ladies, for the diplomatic corps and mem bers of the government. The Senators' seats were draped in crimson, those for managers and counsel in blue. '"Most formidable of American advocates was' the rollicking, witty, audacious Attorney-General of Maryland ; boon companion of Chase and the whole bar; drunken, generous, slovenly, grand ; Bull-dog of Federalism, as Mr. Jefferson called him ; shouting with a school-boy's fun at the idea of tearing Randolph's indictment to pieces and teaching the Virginia Democrats some law, — the notorious reprobate genius Luther Martin." Henry Adams' Life of John Randolph, page 141. 20 Charles Lee, late Attorney General of the United States, ancl Robert Goodloe Harper, who had but just ceased to be the Federal leader in the House and Avho has passed into history as one of Mary land's greatest advocates. Of lesser fame were Joseph Hopkinson, author of "Hail Columbia," and Philip Barton Key, of a family identified Avith our other great national anthem, " The Star Spangled Banner." The charges against Judge Chase Avere embraced in eight articles. Their general drift Avas that he had violated his official oath and been unmind ful of his judicial duties in two cases tried before his court and that he had improperly charged a grand jury, making his charge a political tirade against the party in power. Judge Chase Avas undoubtedly an obstinate and bitterly prejudiced old Federalist, Avho had been very overbearing to members of the bar and most injudicious in his remarks concerning President Jefferson's official course, yet that he Avas not de serving impeachment the result of the trial before a body containing a majority politically opposed to him and to whom Chase's "bacon face," as an opposing journal derisively termed it, Avas not more obnoxious than his political course, clearly indicates. The Avisdom of the verdict is at this day pretty generally admitted. The arguments in the trial by Chase's counsel 21 are characterized by Hildreth as "Martin's mas sive logic, ancl Lee's and Harper's argumenta tive eloquence directed always to the point." 1 Space for extracts from Martin's argument is wanting, but one notes in passing that therein Martin lays down an important view of an old question in ethics Avhen he says, that Avhen coun sel have done all that can be done to insure a fair trial for a client, if agreeable to law and to clear, undoubted evidence the prisoner is guilty, it is the duty of counsel to submit his client's case to the honest decision of the jury Avithout any attempt to mislead them, ancl this whether the counsel are appointed by the Court or employed by the criminal. He Avell adds " the duty 'of a lawyer is, most certainly, in every case to exert himself in procuring justice to be done to his client, but not to support him in injustice." As is Avell known the impeachment Avas not sustained, only three of the eight articles receiv- 1 "If any student of American history, curious to test the relative value of reputations, will read Randolph's opening address, and then pass on to the argument of Luther Martin, he will feel the distance between show and strength, between intellectual brightness and intellectual power. Nothing can be finer in its way than Martin's famous speech. Its rugged and sus tained force ; its strong humor, audacity, and dexterity ; its even How and simple choice of language, free from rhetoric and affectations ; its close and compulsive grip of the law ; its good-natured contempt for the obstacles put in its way, — all these signs of elemental vigor were like the forces of nature, simple, direct, fresh as winds and ocean, but they were opposite qualities to those which Randolph displayed." Adams' Life of John Ran dolph, pp. 146-147. 90 ing even a majority of the votes of the Senators, none the requisite two-thirds.1 In 1805 Martin resigned the Attorney-General ship of his State after twenty-seven years con secutive service. Despite his years (he had passed sixty) he had still the largest practice of any lawyer in the State of Avhich he Avas the most- talked-of citizen, but that he Avas not mercenary is shown by his next appearance in a great public trial Avhere his love for the accused and hatred of Jefferson led him to take a most active part. This Avas in the famous trial of Aaron Burr at Richmond in 1807; with the possible exception of the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson, the greatest State trial in our history. Burr, who had first met Martin during the im peachment trial of Chase, had greatly admired his talents ancl become his Avarm personal friend, and hence at once summoned him to his defence, though he neither had then nor ever had the money to pay for his legal service. Again the surroundings were dramatic and the scene historic. The stately Chief Justice John 'That Judge Chase realized how much he owed to Martin, is indicated by an anecdote (American Law Review, 1807) to the ellect that in a case before the Federal Court at Baltimore, some years after the Chase trial, Martin, overcome by liquor, was so insolent and overbearing in his deport ment that it became unendurable, whereat the District Judge drew up a paper for his commitment for contempt and handed it to Chase, who took up a pen to sign it, hesitated a moment,. threw down the pen and said: "whatever may be my duties as a judge, Samuel Chase can never sign a commitment against Luther Martin." 23 Marshal, then fifty-two years of age, "'with eyes the finest ever seen," sat upon the bench, and as he looked upon Burr, Avho unflinchingly gazed back, it Avas remarked " that tAvo such pair of eyes had never looked into each other before." The counsel for the government Avere a far abler trio than had led the attack upon Chase. Their nominal chief Avas George Hay, son-in-laAV of James Monroe, Avho acted under advice of daily letters from Jefferson, avIio Avas even more anxious for conviction than in the preceding trial and Avho had greater cause and a far better case. But, " where McGregor sits is always the head of the table," and Avhere William Wirt AAras one of the counsel there could be no other head. Although but thirty-five, Wirt was even now master of a style of impassioned eloquence that swept all be fore it, as can readily be realized by recalling tlie oft-quoted description in his speech at this trial of the ruin of Blennerhasset's home by Aaron Burr. The last of the trio Avas Lieut.-Gov. Alex. McRea, described as " a sharp-tongued lawyer." As in the other trial the real leader of the de fence was the accused, a man Avhose Avhole life Avas a romance full of shattered possibilities of good ness and greatness and Avho, if he had possessed any moral balance, might even then have sat in the Presidential Chair filled by Jefferson instead 24 of occupying the culprit's seat in a trial for treason ordered by that chief magistrate. The nominal leader of the five able counsel for the defence Avas Edmund Randolph, who had held two portfolios in Washington's cabinet (ancl left the last under a cloud) and had also been Gov ernor of Virginia, able, learned and dignified; second, Martin; third, John Wickham, leader of the Richmond bar; fourth, Benjamin Botts, father of the celebrated John Minor Botts, young but eminent for his fearlessness; ancl fifth, Jack Baker, "a jolly dog," lame but very witty. Martin's old antagonist in the Chase frial, John Randolph, Avas noAV foreman of the grand jury, having tried in vain to escape from that duty on the ground of his prejudice against the prisoner. Martin's argument in the Burr case can be found in full in the official published report of the trial. All in all it impresses one as a skilful bit of special pleading by one Avho seeks every technical loophole for his client's escape, and Avho has read and studied hard for precedents to that end, pressing these home upon tho court under the plea of asking fair play for Burr, regardless of the consequences to Blennerhassett ancl othei's indicted, notwithstanding that he specially dis claims such purpose. A bit of terse common sense may be excerpted from Martin's argument on a question repeatedly 25 coming before the courts as to the capability for jury service on the part of those who have read newspaper accounts of the alleged crime, Avhere he says " every citizen reads the papers. He sees therein the charges against the accused. He Avould not have the soul of a man, nay not the soul of a mosquito, if he did not take a part in Avhat Avas going forAvards and an interest in Avhat concerned the welfare of his country. It cannot be doubted that juries are as fallible as judges and as liable to be influenced by their feelings and passions by what they see and hear." In the same argument Martin availed himself of the opportunity afforded by an allegation that Jefferson Avas keeping back certain important pa pers necessary for Burr's defence, to pour upon him the vials of Avrath Avhich he Avas ever ready to uncork Avhen the President's name Avas men tioned. He closes this passage of invective by say ing that " Avhoever withholds necessary informa tion that would save the life of a person charged Avith a capital offence is substantially a murderer ancl so recorded in the register of heaven." In one of his letters to Mr. Hay, Jefferson re torts : " Shall we move to commit Luther Martin as a particeps criminis Avith Burr? Grayball will fix upon him misprision of treason at least, and at any rate his evidence will put down this unprin- 4 26 cipled and impudent Federal bull-dog, and add another proof that the most clamorous defenders of Burr are all his accomplices. It will explain Avhy Luther Martin Acav so hastily to the aid of ' his honorable friend,' abandoning his clients ancl their property during a session of a principal court of Maryland, iioav filled, I am told, Avith the clamors ancl ruin of his clients." Martin was again on the Avinning side, for, de spite popular belief in Burr's guilt, at least in intention, which found voice in the jury's verdict of " not proved to be guilty," the case of the gov ernment Avas hopeless after Judge Marshall's ruling that the assembling and enlisting of men on Blen- nerhassett's Island shoAAred no overt act; that even if it did, Burr's agency did not appear, and that the overt act must bo established before testimony as to Burr's conduct or declarations could be admissible. As usual Avith him, Martin stuck by Burr through good and evil report, and after the trial took him with Blennerhassett to his OAvn home in Baltimore as guests. This created great public indignation in the city, and handbills were posted about that "effigies of Chief Justice Marshall, of Burr and Lawyer ' Brandy-Bottle ' " Avould be hanged on Gallows Hill that evening, a plan which Avas carried out, the police only preventing a public riot. 27 In the recollections of John Barney, quoted by Parton in his life of Burr, Barney states that he Avas present at a dinner given in Burr's honor by Martin at this time, at AA'hich Burr rose from the table and Avent to the window to bow to a passing band, Avhich, he supposed, had come to serenade him, but when he discovered that the tune was "the Rogue's March," the Avindows Avere quickly closed. This anecdote Avas confirmed by the late Wm. Jessop of Baltimore, Avho headed the pro cession on the occasion. In 1814 Martin was appointed Chief Judge of the Court of Oyer and Terminer for Baltimore city ancl county, a position which he filled very satis factorily till the abolition of the Court in 1816. In February, 1818, forty years from the date of his first commission, he Avas reappointed Attorney- General of Maryland, but his poAvers soon Avaning an assistant had to be appointed, and he appeared in but few cases. The last important case in which I find record of him Avas the famous case of McCul loch vs. State of Maryland, before the United States Supreme Court in 1819, a test case as to the right of a State to tax the circulation of a United States bank Avithin its limits. Martin appeared for the State, with William Pinkney opposed to him. It is curious to note that in Martin's argument in this case he goes back to the "strict construction" view of the United States 28 Constitution of his early days in opposition to the general tenor of the stiff federalism of his middle life, leading to the conclusion that his argument is rather " official " than from his con victions. In 1820 he had a stroke of paralysis and became entirely dependant upon his friends, as he never saved any money, which state of affairs led the Maryland Legislature in 1822 to pass an act, which is unparalleled in American history. This act required every lawyer in the State to pay an nually a license fee of five dollars, the entire pro ceeds to be paid over to certain designated trus tees "for the use of Luther Martin." The hold that Martin had upon his professional brethren is indicated by the fact that but one lawyer is on record as ever having objected to paying this remarkable tax, and he was induced to withdraw his objections to the constitutionality of the act before the case reached the highest court, while the tax Avas almost universally paid ungrudg ingly. As the end drew near, Burr, Avho Avas Martin's debtor in every sense, took him into his own house in New York ancl gave him a permanent home therein, where, paralyzed, infirm and poor, he Avas enabled to pass his last days in comparative comfort, dying July 10, 1826, aged eighty-two years. 29 Martin as a Lawyer. Whatever his merits or demerits as man or statesman, Luther Martin was indisputably a great laAvyer. The cases in which he was engaged in the formative period of our republic Avere many of them of State or national interest, ancl as the lead ing laAvyer of Maryland at the time he did much to mould the general tenor of its laAvs. His con temporaries, the foremost lawyers of his day, such men as Pinkney, Wirt, Harper, Taney and Story, have nearly all of them left on record tribute to his great abilities. A careful perusal of such of Martin's arguments as have been preserved — almost invariably they are very lengthy — show a marvellous memory and tremendous amount of knoAvledge of law. Equip ped Avith endless precedents, he cites them at great length ancl exhausts his side of the case ; yet, Avhile here and there is found a piece of tremendous invective or amusing sarcasm, as a Avhole the speeches are pretty dull reading. One concludes after careful study of these arguments that Martin won (for he Avas very successful) more by weight of precedent and knowledge of laAv than by per sonal eloquence. William Pinkney speaks of Martin's argument in a case in Avhich he Avas pitted against him as "remarkably redundant" and "remarkably defi- 30 cient" in that he had resorted to authorities with out number to support what nobody denies and " had abandoned the field of fair argument," but in the same speech defends Martin from any suspicion of dishonorable action and alludes "to his generosity and utter negligence in pecuniary' matters." In this connection it is interesting to quote from Judge Taney, Avho, in his autobiography, says, "I haAre seen Pinkney writhe as if in pain when lis tening to Martin speaking in his slovenly Avay in broken sentences, using the most indefensible vulgarisms and sometimes mispronouncing his words," whereas Pinkney, he adds, often over dressed both his person and his manner, frequently addressing the court with hands gloved Avith amber- colored doeskins. Chief Justice Taney devotes much space in his autobiography to Martin, saying that "he was a profound lawyer. He never missed the strong- points of a case and, although much might have been omitted, everybody Avho listened to him Avoulcl agree that nothing could be added," that the foremost men of the bar were afraid of his inexhaustible resources and that his fairness to the accused Avhen Attorney-General Avas always notable. Judge Joseph Story, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, gives a very inter- 31 esting sketch of Martin in a letter Avritten at Washington in 1808 (quoted in full in the life of Judge Story by W. W. Story). He found him diffuse, " but amid the chaff is excellent Avhcat." He animadverts on his slovenly appearance and says, "you should hear of Luther Martin's fame from those avIio have known him long and Avell, but you should not see him." Aaron Burr Avrote of Martin, " with better breed ing and a redemption from habits of inebriety his would be a perfect character. His heart is over flowing with the milk of benevolence. His pota tions may sometimes perhaps coagulate, but they Avill never acidify the fluid Avith which it is so Avell replenished," piously adding, " may it never be Avastcd on the unworthy." In Blenncrhassett's diary of the Burr trial there is a vivid picture of Martin's staggering into his room, introducing himself, swallowing a pint tum bler of brandy, and then talking Avonderfully Avell upon all subjects, astonishing his hearers by the Avidth and depth of his knowledge but disgusting them at the same time by his bad manners. Ad mitting his Avonderful power of citing facts and making arguments that sweep aAvay all opposition, Blennerhasett denies him fancy or grace and sums him up in one Avord as " the Thersites of the law." That, especially in later life, Martin Avas some times guilty of great disrespect to the court is 32 evident from recorded cases in which he Avas severely reprimanded for such offences. His Private Life. The private life of a man Avho for a half century or more held such prominent position in the pub lic eye surely awakens interest, but herein it is that he Avas most a failure. Tho happy husband and father of Pine's picture, the friend of judges ancl of statesmen, the rival of Wirt and Pinkney, the generous host ancl entertainer of the Avealth and blood of Baltimore, died a childless Avidower, poor and imbecile, from his bad habits. In his family relations he Avas especially unfor tunate. His Avife, of Avhom a beautiful, miniature by Rembrandt Peale is still extant, died Avhile he Avas in the prime of life, leaving him two daugh ters Avho inherited her beauty. In the year 1800, while these girls were in their, teens, Martin, noAV fifty-six years of age, paid his addresses to a charming and Avealthy Avidow, Mrs. Mary Hager, a lady who at fifteen years of age had refused Gen. Horatio Gates, of revolutionary fame, and Avho Avas at this time the Avidow of Charles Hager, mother of one daughter, ancl possessed of a large estate in Western Maryland. The mother had occasion to employ Martin on some law business ancl Avas shrewd enough not to refuse him till he 33 had Avon hei* suits. She subsequently married a Col. LeAvis. A series of Martin's letters to this lady are extant. All of them are readable, most of them arc very ardent love letters and very interesting from their mixture of loA-e and politics as Avell as from their revelation of the Avriter's character. In the very first of the series, dated Annapolis, May 12, 1800, he offers himself as folloAvs : " You have a charming little daughter Avho Avants a father. I have two Avho stand in need of a mother. By doing me the honor to accept my hand, our dear children may have the one and tho other, and I promise you most sacredly that in me you shall ever find a tender, indulgent and affectionate husband, and your present little daugh ter shall find in me everything she could Avish in a father. My fortune, my dear madam, is not in considerable. I have a large landed estate in Maryland and Virginia and my practice brings me more than $12,000 per year. Our estate united Avill enable us to live in a style of happiness ancl elegance equal to our wishes, and so far am I, my dear madam, from Avishing my little girls to be benefited by your estate, that if we should not increase our family, your fortune, Avhatever it may be, shall be your own ; if you survive me, or if you should not survive me, your daughter's." The third letter of the series tells its oavii story 34 and is pretty conclusive evidence that at this period of his career Martin had lost the power of self-control in the use of stimulants. Reproaching the lady for coldness, he says : "I have been told since you left town that on last Sunday Aveek, in the evening, I Avas seen at your lodgings. Of this I had no possible recollec tion. I doubt not that I made a very foolish fig ure, but I think it impossible that 1 should have behaved Avith rudeness or impropriety. Was that the reason, my very dear Mrs. II , of the coldness and reserve you appeared to meet me Avith on the Monday morning Avhen I called on you before I Avent to Annapolis? If so, I Avill not blame you, but be assured you shall never see mo again in a situation that I know not what I do, unless it should proceed from the intoxication of love. In. the heat of summer my health requires that I should drink in abundance to supply the amazing, Ayaste from perspiration, but, having found that I Avas so unexpectedly affected as I was by cool Avater and brandy I have determined to mix my Avater with less dangerous liquors. Nay, I am not, only confining myself to mead, cider, beer and, hock, mixed with soda Avater, but I am accustom ing myself to drink Avater alone. Tims if avc live to see, each other again you -will find me most completely reformed ancl the soberest of the sober." 35 In a letter of December 17, 1800, he is very loving ancl pleads for a favorable ending of his suit, announces that he has sent the lady a Christ inas box of currants and raisins Avith a jug of Madeira for mince pie, ancl (forgetting his prom ised reformation) promises to drink her health in a glass of good Madeira at 2.30 p. m. on Christmas day and Avishes her to observe the same hour by a similar libation. In the last letter, June 12, 1801, the advocate virtually abandons his suit as hopeless and falls back into the position of legal adviser and per sonal friend. . Luther Martin's besetting sin Avas indisputably love of, and excessive indulgence in, ardent spirits; Numberless anecdotes illustrative of this fact are still in circulation in Maryland, many purely tra ditional but others Avell founded. At a meeting of the Maryland Historical Society many yeai's since, Judge Giles (United States District Judge) cited John Quincy Adams as having informed him that he (Adams) Avas once present in the United States Supreme Court when Martin Avas so drunk that the Court adjourned rather than let hiin attempt to conduct his case.1 He Avas often compared to Porson, the great Oxford professor, Avho absorbed liquors and Greek Avith equal love ancl felicity: ¦Judge Campbell tells me that this was in the case of Fletcher vs. Peck. Cranch's U. S. Supreme Court Reports, Vol. VI. 36 This comparison is apt in connection with a story told in Tyler's life of Judge Taney (page 122 seq.) : In a suit of great magnitude as to the interests involved, in Avhich Mr. Taney Avas associated with Martin, Avhich Avas to be tried at Hagerstown, the two started from Frederick, 26 miles distant, the evening before the appointed clay of trial. At every relay (5 miles) Martin drank Avhiskey Avhen he could get it, ale, or, if he could get neither, but termilk. Arriving at Hagerstown they took sup per, Avhen Taney told Martin that after a cigar and a rest he Avould come to his room ancl go over the case Avith him. At 11 p. m, he did so, only to find Martin Avith hat, one boot, and all his clothes on, lying across the bed \Tery much under the influ ence of liquor. Finding it impossible to arouse him, Taney returned to his own room distracted but not daunted and studied the case till day break. At the opening of the Court Taney Avas in his seat, sure that Martin Avould not appear, as his room door was locked Avhen Taney left the hotel, but just as the case was called in Avalked Martin ancl " in none of his forensic efforts," said Taney, " did he excel his skill in the management of this case." The late Reverdy Johnson Avas Avont to tell a similar story of his experience Avhen, as a young laAvyer associated Avith Martin, he drove with him from Baltimore to Annapolis to try a case. Stop- 37 ping over night at the Half-way House, Martin got very drunk as usual. Mr. Johnson retired and had been asleep some hours, Avhen he Avas aAvakened by Martin, Avho entered the room, lit a candle, threw himself on his bed, took a volume from •. his pocket and began to read. Much sur prised, Mr. Johnson inquired as to the book Avhich so interested him as to keep him from undressing and retiring at that late hour. " Young man," replied Martin, " I have of late always made it a rule to read a few pages from the book of Common Prayer before going to sleep." That Martin knew the difference between "Philip drunk and Philip sober" Avas evidenced in the pretty Avell authenticated story of the defi; nition of drunkenness that he gave to a certain Episcopal clergyman of Baltimore, Avho having been complained of by some of his parishioners for intemperate habits, sought Martin as his legal adviser. "Are you guilty?" said Martin. "That depends, sir," AA'as the reply, " upon Avhat you call drunkenness." "A man is drunk," replied Martin, " Avhen after drinking liquor he says or does that Avhich he Avould not othenvise have said or done" — a definition, by the Avay, Avhich has been much discussed pro and con in social as Avell as legal circles in Maryland since. As to Martin's religious convictions there is on record a single important entry, that is in the memoirs of Rev. Dr. Jas. Millmore (for many years rector of St. George Church, New York) by Rev. Dr. J. S. Stone (Am. Tract Soc'y, 1848), Avherein, says the biographer, "April 5, 1813, he records an account" (in his diary) " as singular as it Avas pleasing of the conversion of L'. M., an eminent lawyer in Baltimore, advanced in years, avIio had been equally celebrated for his powerful eloquence at the bar, ancl for his notor ious sacrifices at the shrine of Bacchus." After noticing this man's appearance at a public reli gious meeting, Avhere he engaged in exhortation and prayer, in a manner " which for fervor and sublimity astonished all avIio heard him," the diarist exclaims, " Thanks be to God, His power is infinite !" This extract must apply to Martin, yet he Avas certainly an attendant at St. Paul's in Baltimore many years before. The parish records of this, the oldest episcopal parish, show him to have held a pew from before 1800 to 1824 ancl that he Avas characteristically ever in arrears for pew rent for non-payment of Avhich his pew finally passed into other hands. . ' Next to. intemperance, gross carelessness in money matters seems to have been his pervading fault. William Pinkney has already been quoted on this point ancl there is abundant other evi dence. An advertisement clipped from a Baltic 39 more paper some\vhere betAA'een 1813 and 1820 shows Martin advertising for a loan of $1,200 for one year. He offers as security land within from 3 to 12 miles of the city (evidently various pieces of property), "valued at $40,000," offers to pay interest every 60 days and closes by saying "avIio- ever shall advance this money will be secure from any loss, Avill enjoy the same profit upon it as if invested in bank stock, ancl will confer an obli gation upon a person in the catalogue of whose vices whatever they may be, ingratitude has never been named." i It is curious to know on Martin's own authority as narrated by him to the father of a gentleman still living, that at about' this time (Avhether in rcsponso to this advertisement is not stated) the wealthy merchant, Robert' Oliver, of Baltimore,' sent his cashier to Martin with his blank check, requesting him to fill it out for an amount to "cover his present necessities." Said Martin as he. told the story, "I took the noble fellow at his word. and filled out the check for $5,000," for which, tradition says, he subsequently executed a mortgage of some real estate, but it is not proba ble that Mr. OliA'er expected to be or ever was1 fully repaid. In their marriages neither of Martin's daughters chose Avisely, bringing unhappiness alike upon their doting father and upon their own heads.. 40 Thes'e girls, Maria and Elinor, are said to have both been beautiful and accomplished. An exist ing miniature of the" eldest, Maria, by Rembrandt Peale,1 which Avas pronounced by the late Madame Patterson Bonaparte " a living likeness," certainly bears out the claim so far as she Avas concerned. The youngest daughter, Elinor, Avhen but six teen years old married, February 24, 1801, at Brooklyn, N Y., Richard Raynal Keene. This marriage Avas in direct opposition to her father's Avishes, Avas unattended by and never forgiven by him. It lead to the publication by him in 1801-2 of a remarkable series of pamphlets entitled 'f Modern Gratitude." This strange Avork consists of five pamphlets published at short intervals, of Avhich but very few complete collections are extant.. The most valu able, in that, it contains the single pamphlet pub lished in rejoinder by Keene bound up with it, is owned by the Maryland Historical Society, Avho secured it at the "Brinley sale "a few years ago. In these publications Martin excoriates his son- in-law, R. R. Keene, Avith all the virulence of Avhich his extensive vocabulary and Avide reading of criminal cases, gives him command. More bit ter language he could have hardly bestowed upon p 'This with similar miniatures of Martin and his wife, all beautifully executed, are now in possession of his great-nephew Luther Martin McCor mick, of Baltimore. . > 41 'a Cataline or Nero. Yet the Avork is very tedious reading. The sum and substance of the matter, as gleaned from the pamphlets and rejoinder seems to be that after Martin had taken Keene, an impecunious young lawyer, into his home as a matter of kindness and charity, the latter stole the affections of his young daughter Avhen she Avas but a child of fourteen; and after a sinuous course of concealment and deception of her father induced 'her to marry him, despite that father's requests', threats, protestations and commands. All in all the book is a curious study, leading one to feel that Martin undoubtedly had much provocation, that Keene's conduct Avas unmanly, but that the publication could be of no benefit to any of the •parties in interest, yet it has served one1 good pur pose in that in defending himself from Keene's charges as to his own early' pecuniary difficulties •and his. habits, Martihgives the interesting bits 'of autobiography from Avhich we get all our knowl edge of his early life. ' The inauspicious marriage resulted unhappily, the young wife is said to have been ill-treated. She survived but four years, dying in 1807. Tho issue-of the marriage Avas one son, Luther Martin Keene, born in New Orleans, died in 'New York City. Despite his dislike of the father, Martin loved, cared for and educated the son, whose father soon dropped out of sight. When the old 6 42 lawyer died he left his valuable laAv library to the lad, Avho quickly sold it as he did a lot that had been Avilled to his mother by Mr. Burns — father of the celebrated belle, Mrs. Van Ness, who left a lot in Washington to each of Mar tin's daughters out of regard for their father. The young man squandered the . proceeds, Avent from Baltimore to New Orleans, thence to sea and came home to New York a wretched invalid, dying at a hospital in early manhood, ending the direct line of Martin's descendants. Maria Martin, - the . elder daughter, married a naval officer, Lawrence Keene, not a relative of Richard Raynal Keene. They lived a while Avith her father, but her married life was also unhappy and she separated from her husband, who left the city. Not long after she Avas sum moned to his dying-bed in New York, but his life had expired when she arrived. Heart-broken, she .returned home, but soon became insane from her troubles and Avent to an asylum, where she shortly died. If Capt. Cresap ever did Avrong the family of the Indian Logan, surely his sin Avas visited upon his children, even to the third ancl fourth generation. LIFE AND CHARACTER NATHANIEL RAMSAY. A SKETCH OF THE LIFE AND CHARACTEROF NATHANIEL RAMSAY, JAcnl.-Col. Cmmumiilunl of the. Third Regiment of the Muryhiml Line. lyTATHANIEL RAMSAY was of Scotch-Irish 1 parentage. His father, James Ramsay, Avhen young, emigrated from the North of Ireland to the Colonies and, as a. farmer, settled in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Here Avere born to him, among other children, three sons, to each of Avhom he gave the best collegiate education to be had then in America, and each of Avhom did honor to a judicious father's training. William, the eldest of these sons, a much-esteemed Presby terian minister, died in 1771 in Connecticut, where all his ministerial life had been spent. David, the 3roungest, and probably the most intellectual, is 45 46 Avell knoAvn among the eminent men of the early history of the United States as patriot, historian, ancl physician. Nathaniel, the second son, Avas born 1st May, 1741. After graduation at Princeton he studied law, and in 1771 became a member of the bar in Cecil County, Maryland. A portrait by one of the Peales, hanging above me as I write, represents him upholding. the goodly volume of Bacon's LaAvs of Maryland. Before he could have had time to attain a high position as a lawyer, he gave himself to the struggle that ended in the independence of his State and of her associates. He Avas a delegate from his county to the Maryland Convention of 1775, and Avas actively engaged in furthering the ends of that convention until January, 1776, Avhen he Avas made a captain in the first battalion raised in Maryland. This battalion, under the" command of Colonel Smallwood, marched to Philadelphia and thence to New York in time to take part in the disaster of Long Island, Avhich, but for the judgment and the surprising bodily endurance of Washington, might have been the termination of the hopes of the Americans, .and. Avhich, on the day of the battle, Avas relieved only by the daring and steadiness of a portion of the Marylanders, Avho, in repeated charges on Lord CornAvallis, Avere used by Lord Sterling to cover the retreat of his men. 47 Ramsay remained connected with the army until the close of the Avar, although in inactivity during a long period through no will of his own. He found opportunity to gain a reputation for coolness and courage; but he held a suboi'dinate position, and he might have had no claim to remembrance other than that of numbers of the brave and patriotic men of his day but for the fact that, in his last battle as in the first, he Avas among those Avho were called on to face special danger for the safety of others. Colonel Ramsay, as a soldier, was especially prominent on only one occasion ; but his conduct then and the great interests that then rested ou him and his command Avere such as to deserve enduring gratitude, especially from Mary- landers, Avhose reputation he advanced. The dreary Avinter passed by Washington at Valley Forge had ended. The Americans, who did not often attain distinguished success in arms, had shown Iioav they could endure privation and suffering. They seem to OAve the gaining of their freedom to having acted on the precept of the early Church Father, Stand as an anvil that is beaten. When the summer came the British found themselves obliged to abandon Philadelphia, and on the 18th June Sir Henry Clinton crossed the Delaware Avithout opposition. This evacuation had been foreseen, and when a council Avas held to de cide ou the course to be pursued a large majority 48 of the general officers Avere prompt to declare that an action should be avoided: General Lee even •asserted that it would be " criminal " to hazard an enaao-ement. The destination of Clinton Avas un- certain. Washington followed him through New Jersey, purposing to be governed by eA^ents and influenced by a judgment different from that of his council a. second time convened, and Avhich Avas still of the opinion that a collision should be avoided. As the British drew nigh to the heights about Middletown, without further consultation he de cided on his own responsibility to attack them when they should leaAre a strong position held by them near Monmouth Court House. With this view he disposed his troops and gave his orders on the night before, the 28th June, 1778. To Gen eral Lee Avas assigned the duty of attacking the rear of the enemy Avhen on their march. Recon- noitering that he might properly do this, Lee was met by a larger force than he had looked for, Clinton having marched back with his Avhole rear division. After a slight hesitation he directed the Avhole detachment under his command to regain the heights they had passed. "About noon Wash ington, Avho Avas leading the rear division of the army, to his utter astonishment and mortification, met the advanced corps retiring before the enemy Avithout having -made a .single effort to maintain 49 their grounds. Those Avhom he first fell in Avith could give no other information than that by the order of General Lee they had fled without fight ing. General Washington rode to tho rear of the division which he found closely pressed. There he met Lee to whom he spoke in terms of some warmth. . . . lie also gave immediate orders to the regiments commanded by Colonel Stewart and Lieutenant-Colonel Ramsay to form on a piece of ground for the purpose of checking the enemy Avho were advancing rapidly on them." The facts here stated are given on the authority of Judge Marshall : the last paragraph is in his words. It is not for me to describe the battle, but only to present more fully AA'hat Marshall dis misses in a line, — the incident that concerns the subject of my sketch. Why, being Lieutenant- Colonel, Ramsay Avas in command of a regiment I cannot say ; nor do I knoAV Avhen he Avas prac tically promoted. His formal commission is pre served. It is signed by John Jay, President of the Congress of the United States, ancl bears date 1st June, 1779, nearly a year after the battle of Monmouth: it constitutes and appoints him "to be a Lieutenant Colonel Commandant in the Army of the United States, to take rank as such from the first day of January, A. D. 1777." Ramsay's share in the battle of Monmouth is related by an eye Avitness in these words : 7 50 " I Avas at General Washington's side Avhen he gave his orders to Colonels Stewart and Ramsay. General Lee's command Avere retiring before the British troops which Avere pressing close upon them. General Washington arrived at this junc ture, contemplated the scene for a few moments, then called to him Colonel Stewart and Colonel Ramsay, Avhen taking the latter by the hand, 'Gentlemen,' said he to them, 'I shall depend on your immediate exertions to check Avith your tAvo regiments the progress of the enemy till I can form the main army.' ' We shall check them ! ' said Colonel Ramsay. These officers performed what they promised. Colonel SteAvart Avas early Avounded ancl carried off the field. Colonel Ram say maintained the ground he had taken till left Avithout troops. In this situation he engaged in single combat with some British dragoons, nor yielded till cut down by numbers and left for dead on the field. . . . This important service . . . arrested the progress of the British army and gave time to the Commander-in-Chief to bring up ancl assign proper positions to the main army." This relation is taken from a marginal note in a copy of Marshall's Life of Washington, noAv belonging to Mrs. Barnard, a granddaughter of Colonel Ramsay. It Avas there Avritten by James McHenry, afterwards Secretary of War, at the time of Avhich he speaks on General Washington's 51 staff, and,. at another period, an aide to La Fayette and, being an able officer trusted by the Comman der-in-Chief, more than a military aide to the youthful General. Family tradition adds something to the state ment made by Mr. McHenry. It is said that Washington took the Maryland Colonel's hand in both of his and said with great solemnity: "Sir, in God's name hold this ground — minutes. The safety of the army depends on your doing so." The time specified Avas more than doubled before Ramsay's guns Avere Avithdrawn. They Avere saved. Additional facts arc given in a draft of a letter, in Mr. McIIenry's hand, found a feAV yeai*s ago, among family papers, and noAV in my possession. It is entitled " Extract of a letter from a gentle man in the army to his friend in this city," and Avas Avritten for publication in a Philadelphia newspaper Avith a vieAv to correct some wrong statements respecting the battle of Monmouth. There is on the manuscript nothing to indicate Avhether it Avas published at, the time. A copy of it having been given to Mr. Thomas H. Mont gomery, it was by him given to the public through the Magazine of American History of June, 1879. In his comments, Mr. Montgomery conjectures that Mr. Dunlap, the editor to Avhom it Avas offered, could not be induced to give it a place in . his paper. In a paragraph commending a 52 number of officers who had distinguished them-; selves, Mr. McIIenry says : "Indeed every, gentleman Avho was engaged seem to act to the full extent of his force and situation, ancl to vie Avith each other for pre eminence in honor. Some even carried this prin ciple in the ardor of military pursuit beyond its purpose. This Avas the case Avith Lieutenant- Colonel Ramsay. While his . men were on the retreat he Avas attacked by one of the enemy's dragoons Avho charged him very briskly. The Colonel was on foot. It Avas for some time be-. tween them a trial of skill and courage. After the horseman fired his pistol, the Colonel closed in and Avounded ancl dismounted him. Several dragoons now came up to support their com rade ; the Colonel engaged them . cominus ense, giving and receiving very serious wounds, till at length attacked in his rear and overpowered by numbers he Avas made prisoner. General Clin ton paid a proper attention to such uncommon prowess and generously liberated the Colonel the following day on his parole." In the marginal note that has been quoted Mn McIIenry states that Colonel Ramsay was left for dead on the field. This Avas the fact. During the early part of the night he revived, but had no • opportunity to escape ; he Avas Avithin the lines of the enemy who held the ground on Avhich the 53 engagement had taken place until about midnight. While the Colonel was fighting hand to hand, a pistol Avas fired at his head within a short dis tance: at the moment of its discharge it Avas turned aside by the sword of an English officer. Life Avas thus saved, but one-half of the Colonel's face Avas burned, and eArer after showed the blackened evidence of his having borne the brunt of a dangerous contest. From the date of his capture at Monmouth Colonel Ramsay saAv no. active service. A long period was passed on parole or in imprisonment. When tardy exchange brought release his com mand had been filled. That happened to him of Avhich many during the Avar had cause to complain. The giving commissions Avas in the hands of Congress Avhose members Avere not ahvays mindful of, or aware of desert. The Com mander-in-Chief, not unfrequently felt the Avrong done to men on Avhom he AA'ould have bestowed marks of honor. He " gratefully remembered," — so Mr. McIIenry wrote on the margin referred to — "the service rendered at Monmouth," and " on his accession to the Presidency of the United States he appointed Colonel Ramsay to the civil office of Marshal, and afterwards to a place of more profit in the customs." Before the act of self-devotion 'ever gratefully remembered,' the two men had been on terms of 54 friendly intercourse. Perhaps, therefore, when at Monmouth Washington called before him the com manders of the two regiments on Avhose exertions he depended, he addressed himself to Ramsay rather than to Stewart, who was of a higher grade. This personal friendship continued through life. This statement was doubted by a friend. Through persistent effort I have learned that the Colonel Ramsay Avho Avas pall-bearer Avas a Virginian. The records of the Masonic Lodge in Baltimore shoAv this. to be the fact. It is probable, although I have no positive evidence of the supposition, that after the close of the Avar Colonel Ramsay resumed the practice of his profession as laAvyer. Twice under the first Federation of the United States he represented Maryland in Congress — in 1786 and in 1787. In the first year of the present Government he Avas Marshal in and for the District of Maryland. His appointment is signed by George Washington, President. A second appointment to the same office bears date 28th January, 1794, ancl is signed by Edmund Randolph as Avell as by the President. In December, 1794, he was made Naval Officer for the District of Baltimore, having received a tem porary appointment in August, Avhen the Senate Avas not in session. In marked contrast Avith a later custom of the Republic, Colonel Ramsay held this office during the remainder of his life — that is, under Washington and Adams, Avhose political opinions he shared, being a Federalist, and also under Jefferson' ancl Madison and Monroe. His first appointment may be attributed to his General's gratitude ; his long continuance in office was due to ability and faithfulness in discharge of duty. Despite a someAvhat lavish expenditure and a too trustful mode of dealing Avith men, Colonel Ramsay was, in a business sense, a prosperous man. At Carpenter's Point, in Cecil County, where the North East River joins the Chesapeake Bay, he OAvned a Valuable estate, at that time especially valuable as a fishing shore. Here, all his life, he Avas fond of spending such time as public duty granted. - His home, for a time, Avas in Annapolis. The United States Court for Maryland, when first estab lished, was held in Annapolis.' In Baltimore, 'during many years, he occupied Fayetteville — a handsome mansion then on the outskirts of the city belonging to the friend to Avhom Ave are indebted for testimony respecting the facts that secure to Ramsay a place in the history of his coun try — testimony modestly Avithheld by his brother, the historian. Mr. McHenry had rented his house when absent at the seat of government as Secretary of War. On his return to Baltimore, not to disturb his tenant and to indulge an affectionate intimacy, he built himself another dwelling near by. The 56 strong friendship thus shoAvn Avas made closer by the marriage of a son of the one to a daughter of the other. In person Colonel Ramsay was very tall — two or three inches above six feet. In early life his frame, although vigorous, was somewhat slight. He is rightly so represented in the spirited bronze casting by Mr. Kelly on the monument lately erected at Monmouth. As age advanced his fig ure filled out, so that his commanding appearance Avould have insured observance among his felloAv- townsmen had he not been Avell knoAvn to all, and remarkable also as among the last of the cocked hats in Baltimore. Courage and gentleness are often associated. Colonel Ramsay was characterized by the one quality and by the other. He was modest in manners, even to an appearance of diffidence ; yet, this shyness overcome, he was found to be full of humor and good fellowship ; i. e., " within the limit of becoming mirth," for he AAras an avowed Christian, Avalking in the fear of God. His daugh ters were fond of telling of a habit that marks sen timent as Avell as devoutness. After the dismissal of his family, before retiring himself, he Avas used to go out and under the open heaven hold com munion with his Maker. He Avas claimed as a playmate by children. The poor kneAV him to be their friend, and therefore not unfrequently im- 57 posed on him. His daughter, has related how on one occasion her father meekly submitted to a virago of the neighborhood, Avho, with the rough ness of one claiming a disputed right, demanded food for her pigeons, because he had replaced a broken AvindoAV-pane in his granary and they could no longer get their accustomed supply of corn and oats. Another fact, also told me by his daugh ter, shoAvs that his kindness of heart betrayed him into doubtful modes of relieving suffering. As Avinter approached he ahvays laid in large stores of wood brought from his Cecil estate — stores large enough for his family and for some of his neighbors who could not buy and to beg Avere ashamed. When rebuked for alloAving himself to be openly robbed, his only answer Avas, "Poor fel- Ioavs, they must be cold or they would not take my Avood." The rigidly righteous may censure his dealings Avith the poor ; but he will not be condemned for having shoAvn mercy. He was long remembered with affection because of his tenderness ancl generosity, as well as with admiration for other characteristics. Soon after his admission to the bar Colonel Ramsay married Miss Peale, a sister of Charles Wilson Peale, the artist and naturalist. From this marriage there Avas no issue. In 1792 he 8 58 took a second Avife, Charlotte Hall, daughter of Aquila Hall and Sophia White, descendants of early settlers in the province. Of five children born of this union three survived their father : William White Ramsay, who left one son and three daughters ; Sophia Hall, married to Daniel McIIenry, whose only child, Ramsay, died unmar ried ; and Charlotte Jane, who was married to Henry Hall of Shandy Hall, captain of cavalry during the Avar of 1812, and Avhose five children are now living. Colonel Ramsay died October 23, 1817, ancl Avas buried in the Presbyterian burying ground, corner of Fayette and Green streets, Baltimore, wherein was built about thirty-five years ago the Westminster Church.1 1 A few days after, the following obituary notice appeared in the Baltimore Patriot. Died, On Friday morning at 2 o'clock, Col. Nathaniel Ramsay of Baltimore, who in the revolutionary war distinguished himself as a hrave, meritorious and humane officer. He was loved and esteemed by all the army, particularly by that great, good, and discerning man, Gen. AVasji- INGTON. At the Battle of Monmouth, when our army was pressed by the enemy advancing rapidly, Gen. Washington asked for an officer; Col. Kamsay presented himself; the General took him by the hand and said, "if you can stop the British ten minutes (till I form)' you will save my army." Col. Kamsay answered, " I will stop them or fall." He advanced with his party, engaged and kept them in check for half an hour ; nor did he retreat until the enemy and his troops were mingled; and at last, in the rear of his troops, fighting his way sword in hand, he fell, pierced with many wounds, in sight of both armies. Add to this he was one of the best husbands, fathers and friends in the world. He will forever be lamented by Ms neighbors, and all who knew him. 59 In Independence Hall, Philadelphia, may be found a portrait of Colonel Ramsay and also one of Dr. David Ramsay, by whom painted the cata logue does not state : the likeness seems to have been secured as was that of the Scottish kings before Macbeth. The daughters of Mrs. Hall, besides a very attractive portrait in oil, from life, of Dr. Ramsay, have three portraits of their grandfather, taken at different periods of his life : one full-size in oil, and two miniatures on ivorv. Brief mention of " the brave Colonel Ramsay " has been made in not a feAV publications, and lately, through the erection of the monument to com memorate the Battle of Monmouth, attention has been draAvn to the gallant conduct of his command in checking what threatened to be a rout. A notice of his life Avas written by myself for Johnson's Cyclopedia, where it appears over the name of General J. G. Barnard, and to Mr. Kelly, who has by his art enhanced the value of the Monmouth Monument, for some publication in connection with that memorial, I gave a year ago the substance of this sketch ; but I have no reason to suppose that my paper has been or will be used. In a pamphlet Avithout date, entitled " Sketch of Colonel Nathaniel Ramsay, of Cecil County, Md.," Isaac R. Pennypacker, Esq., has given a number of interesting facts, gathered from various sources 60 with a diligence presumably quickened by the fact that Mrs. Pennypacker is a granddaughter of Mr. William White Ramsay. I have not ventured to add the fruit of his research to what is familiar through family relations. W- F. Brand. Rectory of St. Maky's Church, Harford Co., Maryland, October, 1885. THE NATIONAL MEDALS UNITED STATES. A Paper read before the Maryland Historical Society, March 14, 1887, HY RICHARD M. MoSHERRY, Of the Baltimore Bar. JaHimore, 1887. THE NATIONAL MEDALS OF THE UNITED STATES. ^urxd-HPublxccxlxon, Q!Tto. 25. THE NATIONAL UNITED STATES. A Paper read before tlie Miirylainl Historical Society, March 14, 1887, BY RICHARD M. McSHERRY, Of xnE Baltimore Bar. 3B;iIliiiioir, 188 /. PEABODY PUBLICATION FUND. Committee on Publication. 1886-87. HENRY STOCKBRIDGE, JOHN AV. M. LEE, BliADI.EY T. JOHNSON. Printed by John Murimiy & Co. printers to tub maryland historical s001kty. Baltiuore, 1887. THE NATIONAL MEDAL OF THE UNITED STATES. SO far as authentic history goes, the great deeds of men have been commemorated in some conspicuous form, not only as a just recom pense for Avell accomplished duty, but as an incen tive to future generations to emulate the public virtue of the hero. As the Prince Ozias said to Judith, " He has so magnified thy name this day that thy praise shall not depart, out of the mouth of men." And beyond authentic history in that semi-tAvi- light noAv being pierced by the keen eye of science, Egyptian papyri, immemorial stones canned Avith Assyrian and Persian cuneiform, Avith Scandina vian and Teutonic Runes, or Avith Aztec hiero glyphs, all give us in picture or in prose the story of the public triumph. 5 6 But the natural fitness of things requires that public reward for public services should be ex pressed not only in a conspicuous, but also in an enduring form, and so all the resources of art and labor and treasure have in each succeeding age been utilized and exhausted, to produce gorgeous edifices, temples and monuments to signalize the victories of the great captains and the reigns of the great kings and princes of the earth. Many of these great monuments of the past do survive, such as the Pyramids, and the later edi fices of Greece and Rome, and to an extent we know their meaning and the name of the person in Avhose honor they were built. But Avho shall tell us of the number that have fallen into ruin and disappeared, as the men whose names they were built to perpetuate have disappeared and been forgotten. And of those that exist which one tells us that Avhich any coin dug from the old soil of the Troad Avill tell us ; the name, the date, the very features of the man in Avhose honor it was struck. The two largest and most imposing monuments on the Appian Avay, near Rome, are circular edi fices, one of which is so large that there is a house and farm buildings and an olive grove upon its summit, and no man knows in Avhose honor it was built. The other, which is somewhat smaller, tra dition calls the tomb of Cecilia Metella, but tradi- tion cannot tell us who Avas Cecilia, nor why this sumptuous pile Avas erected to her memory and the tomb itself is silent. But medals, as memorials, are not silent. In a year, or a hundred years, or a thousand years, or ten thousand years, after the man has played his part, this little metal disk is a Avitness Avho shall tell him who reads, the name of the man and the deed he did, and the time and the country, and shoAv his very features " in his habit as he lived." Much as Ave are indebted to ancient coins for exact and concise historical information, it Avould appear that Avhat we call a medal Avas practically unknoAvn to antiquity, which only struck pieces destined for circulation and exchange as money. The ancient engravers in the types of current money infinitely varied, endeavored to multiply and disseminate religious and historical ideas, but these Avere technically coins not medals. The exact definition of a medal according to the science of numismatics is, " A piece of metal in the form of a coin not issued or circulated as money, but stamped with a figure or device to preserve the portrait of some eminent person or the memory of some illustrious action or event." It may be fairly said that we OAve the medal, according to this definition, to that period to which all arts are so much indebted. I mean the Italian Renaissance of the fifteenth century, which broke 8 the old mould that imprisoned art in conventional forms and brought her back to her mother nature. Vittorio Pisano or Pisanello Avas indeed the creator of the medal proper. He was a portrait painter of Verona, and the first technical medal Avas designed by him in honor of John Paleologos, next to the last Greek emperor of Constantinople. This potentate, Avho Avears in the medal a very remarkable headdress copied from life, was at the time, 1439, attending the great Oecumenical Coun cil held at Ferrara and Florence, consulting about the union of the Greek and Latin churches, and had this medal struck in honor of his visit. So accomplished an artist was Pisano, that a very late Avork on numismatics says that, " He marked the limits of the art to Avhich he gave birth, and his successors have made variations on his style but not improvements." From his time onward Italy has been distin guished in this beautiful art — the long list of its masters, either as designers, engravers or both, including such great names as Ratfaele and Bene- venuto Cellini. France followed quickly in the footsteps of Italy, and a very beautiful medal was struck in 1451 to commemorate the taking of Bordeaux and the final expulsion of the English from France. Other nations followed in the Avake and adopted the idea, so that every civilized country soon had issued 9 national medals of more or less importance and artistic merit. " When in the course of human events it became necessary for this people to assume among the powers of the world the separate and equal station to Avhich the laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitled them," the Continental Congress was met at the outset Avith the question as to hoAV the new republic should honor its heroes. It could not give them titles and peerages, but it could give them, as General Scott once expressed it, "the highest reward a free man can receive — the recorded appro bation of Ms country." Nay, even before the tre mendous declaration of the 4th July, 1776, the Congress had decided the point, for on the 26th March, 1776, it Avas " Resolved, that the thanks of this Congress in their own name and in tho name of the thirteen united colonies whom they represent be presented to His Excellency General Wash ington, and the officers and soldiers under his command for their Avise and spirited conduct in the siege and acquisition of Boston ; and that a medal of gold be struck in commemora tion of this great event, and presented to His Excellency, and that a committee of three be appointed to prepare a letter of thanks and a proper device for the medal." Messrs. Jno. Adams, Jno. Jay and Hopkins, Avere the committee so appointed, and here over tliree months before the Declaration of Independ ence begins the story of 10 The National Medals of the United States. The letter of John Hancock, President of Con gress to General Washington, informing him of this resolution, may Avell be taken as the best expression of the meaning and extent of the honor conferred on an American citizen by an act of Con gress presenting him with a medal. "Philadelphia, 2d April, 177G. " To General Washington. "Sir: It gives me the most sensible pleasure to convey to you by order of Congress the only tribute which a free people will ever consent to pay — the tribute of thanks and gratitude to their friends and benefactors. The disinterested and patriotic principles which led you to the field have also led you to glory ; and it affords no little consolation to your countrymen to reflect that as a peculiar greatness of mind induced you to decline any compensation for serving them except the pleasure of promoting their happiness, they may without your permis sion bestoAV upon you the largest share of their affection and esteem. " Those pages in the annals of America will record your title to a conspicuous place in the temple of fame, which shall inform posterity that under your direction an undisciplined band of husbandmen, in the course of a few months became soldiers; and that the desolation meditated against the country by a brave army of veterans, commanded by the most experi enced generals, but employed by bad men in the worst of causes, was, by the fortitude of your troops and the address of their officers next to the kind interposition of Providence, con- 11 fined for near a year within such narrow limits as scarcely to admit more room than was necessary for the encampments and fortifications they lately abandoned. Accept, therefore, Sir, the thanks of the United colonies unanimously declared by their delegates to be due to you and the brave officers and troops under your command, and be pleased to communicate to them this distinguished mark of the approbation of their country. The Congress have ordered a golden medal adapted to the occasion to be struck and when finished to be presented to you. " I have the honor to be with every sentiment of esteem, Sir, your most obedient and very humble servant, "John Hancock, " President." No country in the world has been as chary of granting this sort of public recognition to its citi zens as the United States. From the beginning of our national history to this, the 112th year of the republic, only eighty-three medals have been granted by Congress, so that of all governmental honors know^n to the world to-day, it is the rarest: It is interesting to recall the various opinions and suggestions made by the great men of that time in treating of this subject. The United States Mint Avas not established until 1792, and previous to that time the revolu tionary medals Avere struck in France generally under the direction of the American minister near that court. And it happened that there was in Paris at that time a brilliant group of engravers 12 who have given us in all of these medals noble specimens of their beautiful art. It appears that the first medal actually struck Avas that of Lieutenant-Colonel de Fleury, which Avas executed under the direction of Dr. Franklin about 1780. The doctor sIioavs his practical mind in a suggesT tion Avhich he makes in a letter to Mr. Jay, the then Secretary of State, he says : "The man avIio is honored only by a single medal is obliged to show it to enjoy the honor which can be done only to a feAV and often awkwardly. I, therefore, Avish the medals of Con gress were ordered to be money, and so continued as to be con venient money by being in value aliquot parts of a dollar." Our government has never quite adopted that idea (Avhich Avas exactly the practice of the coiners of antiquity), but it has come tolerably near it by placing upon every revenue and postage stamp and bank note the portrait of some of our public men. In 1792 the Senate passed a bill for coining- money Avith the head of the President upon it, but General Washington himself opposed it, and the House of Representatives amended the bill by substituting the head of Liberty, the mother or per haps grandmother of the classic female who hoav figures on that coin Avhich is by laAV Avorth 100 cents, and of Avhich we all try to be collectors., Colonel Humphreys, av1io1 Avas entrusted by Mr. 13 Morris with the commission of procuring the other medals Avhich had been voted, immediately upon his arrival in Paris addressed himself to the French Royal Academy of Inscriptions and Belles Lettres, asking them to aid him " in having these medals executed in a manner grateful to the illustrious personages for whom they are designed, Avorthy the dignity of the sovereign power by whom they are presented, and calculated to perpetuate the remembrance of those great events Avhich they are intended to consecrate to immortality." The Academy took a most active interest in the Avork and immediately appointed a committee of four of its members to suggest the designs. Colonel Humphreys returned to America, leav ing the superintendence of the medals to Mr. Jefferson, Avho in Avriting about them to Mr. John Jay, the then Secretary of State, made some suggestions Avhich are thus commented on by Mr. Jay in his report to Congress, dated 11th July, 1787. After reciting Mr. Jefferson's suggestions, he says : " In tlie judgment of your Secretary it would be proper to instruct Mr. Jefferson to present in the name of the United States one silver medal of each denomination to every mon arch (except the King of England for that would not be deli cate) ; and to every sovereign and independent State without exception in Europe, and also to the Emperor of Morocco. That he also be instructed to send fifteen silver medals of each 3 14 set to Congress to be by them presented to the thirteen United States respectively, and also to the Emperor of China with an explanation ancl a letter, and one to General Washington. That he also be instructed to present a copper medal of each denomination to each of the most distinguished Universities (except the British) in Europe, and also to Cte de Rocham- heau, Cte d'Estaing and Cte de Grasse, and lastly that he be' instructed to send to Congress two hundred copper ones of each set together with the dies. "Your Secretary thinks that of these it would be proper to present one to each of the American colleges, one to the Marquis de la Fayette, and one to each of the other Major- Generals Avho served in the late American army, and that the residue Avith the dies be deposited in the Secretary's office of the United States subject to such future order as Congress may think proper to make respecting them. " It might be more magnificent to give gold medals to sovereigns, silver ones to distinguished persons and copper ones to tlie colleges, but in his opinion tlie nature of the- American government as well as the state of their finance. Avill apologize for their declining this expense. All of which is submitted to the Avisdom of Congress. "Jno. Jay." Congress does not seem to have adopted Mr. Jay's report, at any rate the proposed action has never been taken. But it would appear that Mr. Jefferson fully expected that his suggestion would be carried out, as Ave find him under date of 23rd February, 1789, writing to Mr. Dupre, the en graver, asking him for a copy of Dr. Franklin's 15 medal, as he is going to haA'e a description of all the medals printed in order to send them with copies of the medals to the sovereigns of Europe. It is no doubt owing to the fact that the pro posed copies of the medals Avere never struck, that the Bibliography of American National Medals did not begin Avith Mr. Jefferson's description of those given for the Revolutionary battles. The first work on this especial subject known to the Avritcr of this paper Avas published in 1848, by Carey & Hart, Philadelphia, and is called " Memoirs of the Generals, Commodores and other Commanders avIio Avere presented Avith medals by Congress, by Thomas Wyatt. The Avriter's attention was called to this Avork by Mr. W. Elliot WoodAvard of Roxbury, Mass., a name Avell known to all American numismatists. The only accessible copy Avas found in the Boston public library, and up to its date it is a com plete Avork giving an engraving of the medals issued up to that time with a memoir of each of the recipients. Mr. Wyatt seems to have been the first person to collect a full set of our medals, and in a letter from him to Mr. Woodward in 1861, he speaks of the great difficulties he had in searching out and borrowing every medal of the series. For the medals of Major Lee and Major Stewart he Avas 16 obliged to go to France. He had a number of sets struck off for sale at the request, and partly at the expense, of Jared Sparks, Abbott Lawrence, Daniel Webster and other gentlemen interested in the project, and he says that the Legislatures of Maine, NeAV Hampshire, New York, Virginia and Penn sylvania ordered each a set for the public libraries, with a vote of thanks for his perseverance. In 1861 Mr. James Ross Snowden, Director of the Mint, published a volume called the " Medallic Memorials of Washington." Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott & Co. — an interesting and valuable Avork. In 1878 Mr. J. F. Loubat, of New York, pub lished his " Medallic History of the United States of America." This magnificent and exhaustive work has become an absolute authority on the sub ject. All that learning and conscientious and intelligent research can do, has been done to make it perfect, and the Avriter of this paper cheerfully acknowledges his indebtedness to it for most of the facts herein given. The work being, hoAvever, only published as an "edition de luxe," in two large quarto volumes, printed on especially prepared paper and enriched Avith 170. etchings of the medals by M. Jules Jacquemart, it is necessarily too expensive a book for general circulation and is, therefore, perhaps not as Avell known as it ought to be. 17 Mr. Loubat gives descriptions of eighty-six medals which he classifies as national, although seven of them have not the sanction of a Cons;res- sional vote. The first, or Revolutionary group, is composed of the foUoAving : 1. General Washington, for the occupation of Boston, by Duvivier. 2. Major-General Gates, for the surrender at Saratoga, by Gatteaux. 3. General Wayne, for Stony Point, by Gat teaux. 4. Major John SteAA'art, commanding the left wing storming party same action, by Gatteaux. 5. Lieutenant-Colonel de Fleury, commanding the right Aving storming party same action, by Duvivier. 6. Major Henry Lee, for surprise of Paulus Hook, by J. Wright. This Avas the famous " Light Horse Harry " — the Avorthy sire of his noble son, General R. E. Lee. 7. John Paulding, David Williams ancl Isaac Van Wart, for the capture of Major Andre. This is not a medal proper, but a piece of repousse Avork made by a silversmith. 8. General Morgan, for the victory of the Cow- pens, by Dupre. 9. Lieutenant-Colonel William A. Washington, same action, by Duvivier. 18 10. Lieutenant-Colonel John Eager HoAvard, same action, by Duvivier. 11. Major-General Nathaniel Greene, for victory at Eutaw Springs, by Dupre. This completes the list of medals given to the army during the Revolution. Tavo of the reci pients Avere Marylanders. The first, Major John Stewart, Avas a son of Stephen Stewart, a merchant of Baltimore. He commanded the left storming party at Stony Point, Avhich, in the Avords of Gcn» oral Wayne's official report, " Avith unloaded mus kets and strict orders not to fire, in the face of a most incessant and tremendous fire of musketry and from cannon loaded ¦ Avith grapeshot, forced their Avay, at the point of the bayonet, through every obstacle." In this same report Mr. Archer is commended for gallantry, and Avas in consequence brevetted cap tain by order of Congress, Avhich looks as though Harford County had a representative in that action. Colonel Stewart. was a first lieutenant in 1776, captain in 1777, served through the Avar Avith great distinction, and commanded a regiment in tho Southern campaign. He Avent to South Carolina directly after the Avar and died there in 1783,. and so Avas comparatively little known in Maryland outside of his own kinsmen. Of the other Mary- lander —Colonel John Eager Howard — nothing 19 need be said here ; his life is a part of the history of this city and knoAvn to us all. The Maryland bayonet Avas as effective under Colonel Howard in South Carolina as it had been under Colonel Stewart on the Hudson, as will appear from these Avords taken from General Morgan's official report of the action at the Cow- pens: "Lieutenant-Colonel HoAA'ard observing this, gave orders for the line to charge bayonets, Avhich Avas done Avith such address that they fled with the utmost precipitation, leaving their field pieces in our possession. We pushed our advantage so effectually that they never had an opportunity of rallying, had their intentions been ever so good." It is a matter of history that the gallant Colonel, during the battle of the Cowpens, held in his hands at one time the swords of seven British officers Avho had surrendered to him. , But one medal Avas given during the Revolution to the young American navy — that of 12. Captain John Paul Jones for his various naval exploits, particularly the capture of the British frigate Serapis off the coast of Scotland. This great naval commander hoisted with his own hands the first American naval flag on board the Alfred on October 10, 1776, at Chestnut Street Wharf, Philadelphia. He Avas the only American officer decorated by the King of France, and has the unique distinction of being the only American 20 citizen whose title of knight (chevalier), conveyed by the decoration, has been officially recognized by the United States Congress. This medal is by Dupre, and, Avith the exception of the medal of Major Henry Lee, which is by Joseph Wright, the first draughtsman and die sinker of the United States Mint, and of the medal to the captors of Major Andre, all of those men tioned Avere executed by the great French en gravers, mostly after designs and with inscriptions furnished by a committee of the Academy of In scriptions and Belles Lettres in Paris. Our forefathers evidently did not believe in pro tection to home art, perhaps being of the same mind as a great American general, avIio, in Avriting to the Secretary of War on this subject, said:1 " But 1 beg leave again to suggest that the honor of the country requires that medals voted by Con gress should always exhibit the arts involved in their highest state of perfection wherever found ; fur letters, science and the fine arts constitute but one republic embracing the world." General Wash ington seems to have been also imbued with that idea, for while at Valley Forge, on finding some valuable medical manuscripts — the property of a British medical officer — among some other cap tured property, he directed them to be returned to their owner, saying that the Americans did not Avar against the sciences. 21 There are six other Avell-known medals of the Revolutionary times, which are of very great his torical importance, but are not national in the sense of being ordered by Congress. These are 13. The Libertas Americana, in. honor of the surrender at Yorktown. This Avas ordered by Dr. Franklin to be executed by Dupre., It represents young America as the infant Hercules strangling two serpents. 14 and 15. Tavo medals to Dr. Benjamin Frank lin, engraved and dedicated to him by his friend, Augustin Dupre, both of Avhich bear Turgot's cele brated Latin verse, composed in his honor : " Eri- puit coelo fulmen sceptrumque tyrannis " (He Avrenched the thunderbolt from heaven and the sceptre from tyrants). 16 and 17. Two medals struck in Amsterdam — one called "Libera Soror" in honor of the acknow-. ledgment of the United States by the United Netherlands, the other in honor of the celebration of the first treaty of amity and commerce between those countries. , . 18. The so-called Diplomatic medal. It was then the custom, and, to a great extent is iioav, for a sovereign to give some token of his regard to a retiring : ambassador Avho has been a " persona grata" at his .Court, and General Washington and his Secretary of State — Mr. Jefferson— evidently thought that the United States Government should. 4 * 22 not alloAv itself to be outdone in generosity and splendor by any king of them all, and so ordered these medals, each Avith a gold chain, to cost f 1,000; but only tAvo have ever been given — one to the Chevalier de la Luzerne, Minister of the Iviim- of France in the United States from 1779 to 1784, and the other to the Marquis tie Moustier, likeAvise French Minister at Washington from 1787 to 1790. A medal called the Japanese Embassy Medal Avas struck at the Philadelphia Mint on May 17, 1860, by order of the State Departmant, in honor of the arrival of the first diplomatic representatives of the Empire of Japan in this country. Three gold medals Avere struck, one for each of the three envoys, and copies in silver or copper Avere given to the other members of the Embassy ; but this must not be confounded Avith the Diplomatic medal, and, strictly speaking, is not a national medal. It Avas simply to commemorate the inter esting fact that for the first time in history, the Empire of Japan abandoned its traditional policy of Oriental seclusion, ancl opened regular diplo matic communication Avith Western civilization. Many gentlemen here present Avill doubtless re call the visit of these ambassadors to Balti more on the 8th June, 1860, Avhere, as guests of the Government of the United States, they Avere formally received by tho Mayor and City Council,. 23 and their swords Avere stolen from the Gilmor House. A peculiar and much-criticized incident in that connection Avas that the police authorities advertised, offering a large reAvard — I believe $1,000 — for the recovery of these SAvords, promis ing to the thieves immunity from all criminal prosecution on the return of the stolen property. This was done on the belief that the loss of the swords Avould subject the envoys to the penalty of death on their return to Japan. 19. The first medal given by Congress after the Revolution was to Captain Thomas Truxton, com mander of the United States frigate Constellation, Avhich Avas built at Harris Creek, Baltimore, for the capture of the French ship of Avar La Ven geance, near the island of Guadaloupe, on the 1st February, 1800. This Avas at the time of the unfortunate complication Avith France, Avhich has left us, among other disagreeable reminiscences, the famous French spoliation claims. President John Adams, in Avriting to Captain Truxton in regard to this medal, expressed some views about the navy Avhich do not seem to have been in accord with the policy of our Government for the last twenty years. He says : " The counsels Avhich Themistocles gave to Athens, Pompey to Rome, Cromwell to England, De Witt to Holland and Colbert to France, I have always given, and shall continue to give, to my countrymen— that as 24 the great questions of commerce and power between nations ancl empires must be decided by a military marine, ancl Avar and peace are decided at sea, all reasonable encouragement should be given to the navy. The trident of Neptune is the sceptre of the Avorlcl." 20. The next medal Avas granted March 3, 1805, to Commodore Edward Preble, of the navy, for the gallant action before Tripoli in 1804. We find in the official report high commendation given to a lieutenant Avith the Maryland name of Trippe, avIio commanded one of the boats and Avas severely Avounded in that action. 21-42. Some, reference should noAv be made to the medals Avhich are called by the United States Mint Presidential Medals. Of these there are twenty-two — two for General Washington and one for each of the succeeding Presidents except Gen eral William Henry Harrison, Avho died one month after his inauguration. In 1786 Mr. Kean, member of Congress from South Carolina, moved that medals be struck for presentation to the Indian chiefs Avith Avhom.the United States should conclude treaties. The first medal so struck Avas given to Red Jacket, the great chief of the Six Nations, on his visit to Philadelphia in 1792.. It bore on its face the figure of General Washington, with the legend, George Washington, President, 1792, and all sub: 25 sequent Indian medals have, following this prece dent, borne the engraved portrait of the President Avho approved of the treaty, Avith the date of his administration, thus making a most valuable and interesting addition to our national historical medals. More medals Avere granted during the Avar of 1812 than at any other period of our history. The first three Avere voted January 29, 1813: 43. To Captain Isaac Hull, of the United States frigate Constitution, for the capture of the British frigate Guerriere. 44. To Captain Stephen Decatur, of the frigate United States, for the capture of the British frigate Macedonian, ancl 45. To Captain Jacob Jones, of the United States sloop of Avar WTasp, for the capture of the British sloop of Avar Frolic. Silver medals, copies of the golden ones Aroted to these captains, Avere directed by Congress to be given to the nearest male relatives of Lieutenants Bush and Funk, killed in these actions. The gallant Captain Decatur Avas born in Syne- puxent, Worcester County, Maryland, and Captain Hull, in his report, highly recommends Lieutenant Contee, of the Marines, for coolness and gallantry. Next come the medals of 46. Captain Bainbridge, for the capture of the Java, December 29, 1812. 26 47. Lieutenant McCall, for the capture of the Boxer, September 4, 1813, and 48. Lieutenant William Burrows, for the same action. He Avas in command of the United States brig of Avar Enterprise, was killed in the action and Avas succeeded in command by Lieutenant McCall. His medal was, therefore, voted by Con gress to his nearest male relative. 49. The famous victory of Captain Oliver Hazard Perry on Lake Erie added two medals — one to Perry himself and the other to the second in command 50. Captain Jesse Duncan Elliott, of Maryland, Avho Avas thirty-one years old at the date of that action, but, young as he Avas, had already made his mark by cutting out two British ships from under Fort Erie, for which Congress had voted him a sword of honor. Commodore Perry's old battle flag, Avith the legend " Don't give up the ship," is still preserved at the Naval School at Annapolis. The victory of Lake Champlain Avas rewarded by three medals — one to 51. Captain Thomas McDonogh, one to 52. Captain Robert Henley, and one to 53. Lieutenant Stephen Cassin. Then followed the medals of 54. Captain Lewis Warrington, of the sloop of Avar Peacock, for the capture of the British brig Epervier, April 29, 1814, ancl of 27 f '55. Captain Johnson Blakeley, of the sloop of Avar Peacock, for the capture of the British sloop of Avar Reindeer, July 8, 1814. - 56.; The medals of Captain Charles Stewart, of the United States frigate Constitution, for the capture of the British frigate Cyane, and of .'.¦ 57. Captain James Biddle, of the United States sloop of Avar Hornet, for the capture of the British sloop of, Avar Penguin, complete the list of naval medals granted during the AA^ar of 1812. ' Captain Charles Stewart Avas the maternal grand father of the present famous Irish patriot, Charles Stewart Parnell. .; During the same war the actions of Chippewa, Niagara and Erie, in Upper Canada, were rewarded by medals to 58. Major-General Jacob Brown. ¦*• 59i . Major-General Peter Buel Porter. i 60. Brigadier-General Eleazar Wheelock Ripley. 6L Brigadier-General James Miller. 62. Major-General Winfield Scott. 63. Major-General Edmund Pendleton Gaines, and the victory of Plattsburgh, by the medal of 64. Major-General Alexander Macomb. In the official reports of these battles special mention is made of Captain Towson's, artillery. I suppose that he is. the same gallant, officer whose fame has been immortalized by the naming of the capital of a neighboring county;. 28 The next of the army, medals of the Avar Avas granted for the battle of New Orleans, January 8,- 1815, to 65. Major-General AndreAv Jackson, " Old Hick ory" — " a great democratic victory." And Congress in 1818 voted medals to 66. Major-General WTilliain Henry Jackson, and 67. Isaac Shelby, a Governor of Kentucky, for the battle of the Thames, in Upper Canada, October 5,1813. General Harrison was, as has been already stated, the only President of the United States for Avhom no Presidential Medal was struck. Governor Shelby was born in Hagerstown, Maryland, September 14, 1750. He distinguished himself in the Southern battles in the Revolution-! ary war, and was voted a sword of honor Avith the thanks of the Legislature of North Carolina. .= He Avas Governor of Kentucky from 1812 to 1816, and joined General Harrison at the head of 4,000 Ken tucky volunteers and rendered gallant service at the battle of the Thames. >He declined to be Secret tary of War in 1817 and; died in Kentucky, Julyt 18, 1826. . s. .. .. : The last -medal for this war Avas not voted until February 13, 1835. It av as to ,.....¦ , , -. ,-. , 68. Colonel George- Croghan, for the defense of Fort Stephenson, August 3, 1813.' t ; ; ; ? : Congress does not seem to have found it ne.ces- 29 sary to commemorate the battle of Bladensburgh by the granting of a medal to any of the partici pants in that brilliant strategic movement. 69. From the end of the war of 1812-15 to the time of the Mexican Avar, no medals were voted by Congress, as the Avar with the Florida Indians did not apparently call for any such especial honor ; but during this period a medal was struck in France in honor of the treaty of commerce con cluded Avith that country, June 24, 1822. This is in no sense an official medal, but Mr. Loubat clas sifies it as national by reason of its great historic interest. 70, 71, 72. During the Mexican Avar Major- General Zachary Taylor received no less than three medals, Avith the corresponding vote of thanks of the Congress — one July 16, 1846, for the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma ; one March 2, 1847, for Monterey; one May 9, 1848, for Buena Vista, and 73. General Scott, the hero of 1812, received his second medal for the actions of Vera Cruz, Cerro Gordo, Contreras, Churubusco, Molino del Rey ancl Chapul tepee. All through the reports of these actions we find honorable mention of the Maryland names of Wat son, Ringgold, May, Ramsey, Randolph Ridgcly, and others of the gallant sons of this old State. On the 10th December, 1846, the United States 30 brig Somers, one of tho squadron blockading Vera Cruz under the command of Captain Raphael Semmes, Avas struck by a sudden squall, and sunk Avithin ten minutes from the time the squall struck her. The British, French and Spanish men -of- Avar, Avho Avitnessed the disaster, immediately lowered boats manned by brave men, avIio, at the peril of their own lives, in a raging sea, rescued all but two officers and forty men. 74. Congress passed an act, March 3, 1847, directing that a suitable medal be struck ancl pre sented to the officers and men of these various foreign vessels, in recognition of their gallant and humane conduct. 75. The Martin Costa incident in the harbor of Smyrna, July 3, 1853, resulted in the Aroting of a medal to Commander Duncan N. Ingraham, of the United States ship St. Louis. This gallant officer, evidently a firm believer in " a vigorous foreign policy," Avas informed that Martin Costa, a citizen of the United States, had been claimed as an Austrian subject, Avas taken as a prisoner and con fined on board the Austrian brig Hussar. After polite request for his surrender ancl a refusal from the Austrians, Capt. Ingraham shotted his guns, anchored Avithin half a cable's length of the brig, which had been by this time reinforced by a ten-gun schooner and three Austrian mail steam ers, ancl sent the foUoAving note: 31 " To the Commander of the Austrian brig Hussar : "Sin, — I have been directed by the American charge at Constantinople to demand the person of Martin Costa, a citizen of the United States taken by force from Turkish soil and now confined on board the brig Hussar, and if a refusal is given, to take him by force. An answer to the demand must be returned by 4 p. in. " Very respectfully, " Your obedient servant, " D. N". Ingraham, Commander." Costa Avas then surrendered and sent on shore to the custody of the French consul. 76. A medal was voted on May 11, 1858, to Sur geon Frederick Henry Rose, of the British navy, for volunteering to act as medical officer of the United States ship Susquehanna, nearly all of avhose crew Avere disabled and dying from yellow feArer, and on July 26, 1866, a medal Avas voted to 77. Captains Creighton, Low and Stouffer, for saving the ship's company of the wrecked steamer San Francisco, Avith the Third United States Artil lery on board, in December, 1853. 78. With a magnanimity and true patriotic feel ing Avhich does honor to the American character, the Congress gave no medal commemorating the battles of the great civil war except the one given to Major-General U. S. Grant by the act of Decem ber, 1863, for the victories of Fort Donelson, Vicks burg and Chattanooga. 32 79. On the 28th January, 1864, a medal was also voted to "Commodore" Cornelius Vanderbilt, in recognition of his free gift to the Government of the steamer which bore his name and Avhich Avas valued at $1,000,000. It was provided in the act that a copy of this medal should be placed in the Congressional Library. In his letter accepting the medal, he gives the foUoAving good advice to his descendants: "And it is my hope that those Avho come after me, as they read the inscription of the. medal and are reminded of the event in their father's life Avhich caused it to be struck, will inflexibly resolve that, should our Government bo again imperilled, no pecuniary sacrifice is too large to. make in its behalf, and no inducement suffici ently great to attempt to profit by its necessities." . 80. On tho 1st March, 1871, Congress voted to George Foster Robinson, late a private of Maine Volunteers, $5,000 in money and a gold medal in recognition of his heroic conduct in saving the life of Mr. Seward from the attack of Payne, . the accomplice of John Wilkes Booth, on April 14, 1865; but it seems unfortunate that, this gentleman could not have been suitably rewarded in some other Avay than by, a perpetual record of an act Avhich Americans of all political creeds can now only remember Avith shame and sorrow. These three medals are the only ones in any Avise connected Avith that unfortunate Avar period. 33 81. On March 2, 1867, Congress voted a medal to Mr. Cyrus West Field, of New York, " for his foresight, courage and determination in establish ing telegraphic communication by means of the Atlantic cable traversing mid-ocean and connecting the Old World Avith the New." Mr. Field founded the New York, Newfoundland and London Telegraph Company in 1854, organized the Atlantic Telegraph Company in 1856, and Avas the active mover in that great project until its final real success in 1867. " Peace has its victories as well as Avar," and this Avas assuredly one of the greatest. 82. On the 16th March, 1867, a medal was voted to George Pen body, "for his great and peculiar beneficence in giving a large sum of money, amounting to $2,000,000, for promotion of educa tion in the more destitute portions of the Southern and SoutliAvestern States." ¦ Before a Baltimore audience it Avould be super fluous to make any eulogy upon tho character and good deeds of that great philanthropist. It may be of interest, hoAvever, to give an extract from his letter to Mr. W. H. Seward, Secretary of State, acknoAvledging the receipt of the medal : "Cherishing, as I do, the warmest affection for my country, it is not possible for me to feel more grateful than I do for this precious memorial of its regard, coming, as it does, from thirty millions of American citizens through their representa- 34 tives in Congress, Avith the full accord and cooperation of the President. "The medal, together with the rich illuminated transcript of the Congressional resolution, I shall shortly deposit at the Peabody Institution, at the place of my birth, in apartments specially constructed for their safe keeping, along with other public testimonials with which I have been honored. There, 1 trust, it will remain for generations, to attest the generous munificence of tlie American people in recognizing the efforts, however inadequate, of one of tlie humblest of their fellow- countrymen to promote the enlightenment and prosperity of his native land." This feeling acknowledgment by this great and good man of the honor conferred upon him be comes all the more striking Avhen we recall the fact that he respectfully declined a baronetcy and the Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath, tendered him by Queen Victoria in recognition of his munifi cent charity to the London poor. 83. The loss of the steamer Metis, 31st August, 1872, was commemorated by, a medal granted to the creAVS of a lifeboat and fishing-boat, who saved the lives of thirty-two persons from the wreck. 84. John Horn, Jr., of Detroit, by voto of Juno 20, 1874, received a medal in recognition of his extraordinary record of having, at different times, saved the lives of more than 100 persons from drowning. 85, 86. Congress, by the act of June 16, 1874, authorized the striking of medals in commemora tion of the Centennial celebration at Philadelphia in 1876, ancl two Avere struck at the expense of the Centennial Board of Finance for sale and distri bution. We come noAv to a class of medals distinctly national in their character, but so multiplied in number that it is impossible here to do more than refer to them. 87, 88. On the same clay, June 20, 1874, that the medal Avas voted to John Horn, Jr., Congress passed the following act: "Resolved, That the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby directed to cause to be prepared medals of honor with suitable devices, to be distinguished as life-saving medals of the first and second class, which shall be bestowed upon any persons who shall hereafter endanger their own lives in saving lives from perils of the sea, within the United States or upon any American vessels. "Provided, That the medal of the first class shall be con fined to cases of extreme and heroic daring, and that the medal of the second class shall be given to cases not suffi ciently distinguished to deserve the medals of the first class. "Provided, That no award of either medal shall be made to any person until sufficient evidence of his deserving shall be filed Avith the Secretary of the Treasury and entered upon the records of the Department." Many brave men haAre earned and received this medal since the passage of this act. 36 It is a fact scarcely known outside of the army and navy that our Government gives a medal or decoration exactly equivalent to the Iron Cross of Germany, the Victoria Cross of England or the Legion of Honor of France for distinguished mili tary A'alor, and it is a singular and remarkable tribute to the modesty of tlie recipients that tho country at large has heard so little on the subject. The necessity and fitness of such rewards for valor has been recognized by all nations, and no reward is more highly esteemed by military men than a personal decoration for distinguished bravery. General Washington by a general order at Newburg, August 7, 1782, provided, that for any singularly meritorious action reported by a board of officers, men should have their names enrolled in the book of merit, and should wear a heart in purple cloth or silk, edged with narrow lace or binding, and Avhen so decorated should be per mitted to pass all guards and sentinels which officers are permitted to do. During the Mexican Avar officers were re\varded by brevets, and deserving privates by certificates of merit and $2 additional monthly pay. 89. But during the Civil Avar these makeshifts Avere abandoned, and the Acts of July 12, 1862, ancl March 3, 1863, provided that medals of honor should be given to such officers, non-commissioned 37 officers ancl privates Avho have most distinguished or may hereafter most distinguish themselves by gallantry in action. Up to the end of the Avar in 1865, 330 of these medals had been given and some 300 more have been given since that time. 90. The acts of December 21, 1861, ancl July 16, 1862, made similar provisions for the navy, but excluded commissioned officers. The Avritcr Avas informed by a distinguished naval officer that 338 of these medals Avere given during the Avar and 113 since. This concludes the list of National Medals prop erly so-called ; but there is another one that ought to be in existence, voted as far back as 1857 to the celebrated Arctic explorer, Dr. Elisha Kent Kane. This distinguished naval officer died at the early age of thirty-seven years, and it Avas.only after his death that the medal Avas voted. The Superintendent of the Mint in a letter under date March 5, 1887, says, " The Dr. E. K. Kane Medal AA'as not struck at, the Mint, but I am informed that it Avas manufactured in New York." The writer has not as yet, however, been able to obtain any reliable information about it. A large number of other medals have been struck at the Mint. Some of them by order of State Legislatures, called sub-national medals ; some of them for private individuals. Many of these are of great historical interest, but not being 6 3S national in the sense of being voted by Congress,- they do not come Avithin the scope of this paper.1 But there is a class of medals, badges or orders growing out of our various Avars Avhich should be briefly mentioned. The oldest of these is the Order of the Cincinnati. This society Avas formed by the officers of the Revolutionary army at the cantonments in New- burg on the Hudson in May, 1773. The original institution adopted at that time thus describes the purpose of its formation : " To perpetuate therefore as avcII the remembrance of this A'ast event (the Revolution) as the mutual friendships Avhich have been formed under the pressure of common danger and in many instances cemented by the blood of the parties, the officers of the American army do hereby in the most solemn manner associate, constitute and combine themselves into one society of friends, to endure as long as they shall endure or any of their eldest male posterity; and in failure thereof the collateral branches avIio may be judged worthy of becoming its supporters and members." 1 Congress has in various instances, in granting a gold medal to successful commanders, ordered that a silver medal should be given to each of the subordinate commissioned officers engaged in the action. But as these sil ver medals are simply copies of the ones in gold given to the commanding officers, they are not here separately enumerated, all being of the same design, and therefore to he considered as but one medal, exactly as the numerous life saving and Army and Navy Medals of honor are all repro ductions of one original. in the cases of Colonel John Stewart and Colonel de Fleury, subordinate officers at Stony Point, the resolution of Congress thanked them by name, and two distinct medals were struck, one by Duvivier and the other by Gatteaux, each having its separate and original design, and neither bearing any resemblance to the gold medal of Gen. Wayne. 39 The principles which are declared to be immu table are: to inculcate to the latest ages the duty of laying down in peace arms assumed for the public defence in war ; to perpetuate the mutual friendships commenced under the pressure of common danger ; and to effectuate the acts of benevolence dictated by the spirit of brotherly kindness towards those officers and their families who unfortunately may be under the necessity of receiving them. The society declared to be eligible all commis sioned officers of the army and navy of the United States who left the service Avith reputation, and foreign officers not lower in rank than colonels or captains in the navy ranking as colonels. The original membership was about 2,000, Avith Gen eral Washington as President as long as he lived ; the present membership is hoAvever not over 500. The Hon. Hamilton Fish is the present President- General, ancl the Hon. Robert M. McLane Presi dent of the Maryland State branch. The bald eagle carrying the emblems on his breast was chosen as the insignia of the order, and the medal Avas made in Paris by M. Duval, after designs prepared by Major L'Enfant. Dr. Franklin Avho was later elected an honorary mem ber of the society for life did not approve of this selection for the following reasons, expressed in a letter to one of his family : 40 " For my own part I wish the bald eagle had not been chosen as the representative of our country ; he is a bird of bad moral character, he does not get his living honestly. You may have seen him perched on some dead tree where, too lazy to fish for himself, he watches the labor of the fishing- hawk, and when that diligent bird has at length taken a fish and is bearing it to his nest for the support of his mate and young ones, the bald eagle pursues him and takes it from him. With all this injustice he is never in good case, but like those among men who live by sharping and robbing, he is generally poor and often very lousy. Besides he is a rank coward; the little king bird, not bigger than u sparrow, attacks him boldly and drives him out of the district. He is, therefore, by no means a proper emblem for the brave and honest Cincinnati, who have driven all the king birds from our country, tho' exactly fit for that order of knights which the French call Chevaliers d'lndustrie." The medal is, hoAvever, a very handsome piece, and was the only foreign order allowed to be worn by French officers at the French Court. Many members settled on the land granted to them in the West for their services in the Avar, ancl General St. Clair and Colonel Sargent, two original mem bers, named their three pioneer log-cabins, at the junction of the Licking ancl the Ohio, after their society, and so gave it a flourishing godchild in the city of Cincinnati. . The civil war produced the military order of the Loyal Legion, Avhich is, I am informed, founded on exactly the principles of the Cincinnati, including 41 the hereditary feature Avhich has been so much criticized. It is confined to commissioned officers ancl numbers over 5,000. General Sheridan is the present Commander, succeeding the late General Hancock. Their medal also represents the bald eagle on a six-pointed star. The Grand Army of the Republic, also an out come of the civil Avar, is intended to be a charitable organization for officers ancl men. They are very important in numbers and ha\re a handsome bronze badge. The Mexican Avar originated the Aztec Club and the Association of the Mexican Veterans, ancl I understand that a badge has been adopted called the Order of the Cacti; but this I have never seen, nor any description of it. Jiut noiio of these can be considered as national medals, inasmuch as none of them have ever received any direct Governmental recognition. Congress, however, by the act of July 25, 1868, authorized the wearing of army corps badges on occasions of ceremony. The really national medals may, therefore, prop erly be limited to the eighty-three already enu merated1 granted by order of Congress; and, extra ordinary as it may seem, there docs not exist in •Unless the historical importance of numbers 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 09 gives them the national character which they lack by reason of not having the sanction of a Congressional resolution. 42 any public department of our Government — not even in the Mint itself — any complete collection of them. In 1855 the Mint Avas authorized to strike copies for sale, ancl it was then discovered that nearly all those of the Revolutionary epoch Avere missing. Most of these were, however, obtained from Paris by the courtesy of the French Government, Avhich, more zealous than our own authorities, had. pre served them, ancl new dies Avere struck at our Mint. There are, however, three not yet at the Mint — those of General Wayne, Lieutenant-Colonel Stew art and Major-General Nathaniel Greene ; but, after a three years' search, authentic copies have been procured and are now the property of Mr. T. Harrison Garrett, of this city — a member of this society. The city of Baltimore earned the name of the Monumental City because of her taking the initia tive, in honoring the memory of Washington by the beautiful marble shaft Avhich is to-day one of her greatest ornaments, ancl the erection of other historic memorials, and it would seem to be especi ally fitting that from the city of Baltimore should begin the action which will cause these medals to be properly preserved and placed on record in all the public departments, ancl in every State and Territory in the Union. 43 The larger projects of Dr. Franklin, Thomas Jefferson ancl John Jay,. already mentioned in this paper, did not, it is true, meet with the approval of Congress so far as Ave Iciioav ; but the modified scheme embodied in the joint resolution prepared by ;your committee and already read to you, if it fails noAv, can be tried again in the next Congress. For these are the heirlooms of the Republic. They Avere given by a grateful country " in per- pefuam rei memoriam" ancl they record men and things Avhich this people must not alloAV to pass into oblivion. Here in these fourscore little pieces of metal is an epitome of the history of the United States. Her victories in Avar ancl in peace, the achieve ments of her sons in the arts ancl sciences, ancl the munificence ancl patriotism of her citizens in the hour of their country's need all arc recorded here. Ancl although they may be but the dry bones of history, they are the visible material object lessons which every American child, learning his country's histoiw should be familiar Avith. And when some Dr. Schliemann of the future in taking an archaeological tour in company Avith Macaulay's NeAV Zealander, may commence his excavations on the site of the ruined capital of some State to-day the newest of Avestern territories, he shall exhume, stamped on imperishable metal, in this collection of national medals, the history of 44 the United States. He Avill not know the fact, nor perhaps Avill we, but none the less its existence there Avill be clue to the efforts of the Maryland Historical Society, if it succeeds in accomplishing even partially the Avork that was left unfinished by Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and John Jay. APPENDIX. At the regular meeting of the Maryland Historical Society in April, 1885, the attention of the Society was called to the fact that no complete collection of the National Medals voted by Congress was known to exist in any of the departments of the government, although a number of them were preserved in some form at the United States Mint in Philadelphia. Considering that in the interest of education and for historical reference the preservation and publication of these medals is an important national matter, the Society then passed a resolution constituting a committee for the purpose of investigating the subject and taking such steps as they might deem proper to bring it to the notice of the general government. This committee was composed of Messrs. T. Harrison Garrett, Lennox Birckhead, and Richard M. McSherry, the latter being the chairman. After some correspondence with the officials at the Mint, the committee concluded that the first practical step was to obtain the originals or authentic copies of those medals which are not and never have been at the Mint. These are but four in number, namely, those of General Wayne, Colonel Stewart, and General Greene, all originally struck in France, and that of Doctor Elisha Kent Kane, which has never been struck at all, so far as the committee can discover. 7 45 46 After a two years' search, involving much correspondence, one of the committee got intelligence of the existence of authentic copies of the Wayne, Stewart and Greene medals, and these copies are now in Baltimore, the property of another member of the committee, Mr. Garrett. Immediately after procuring these copies the committee pre pared the following resolution, which was offered in "the House of Representatives January 30, 1887, by the Hon. Jno. V. L. Findlay. Joint Resolution authorizing and requiring the Secretary of the Treasury to have struck copies of certain medals and to deliver the same to certain departments and to the various States and Territories. Whereas, at various times by order of the Congress of the United States, National Medals have been issued in commemora tion of great national events, deeds of valor of our naval and military heroes, important public services by citizens and the administration of our Presidents. And whereas, it is believed that no complete set of these medals is in the possession of the United States Government in the Mint or elsewhere. And whereas, in the interest of education and for historical reference their careful preservation in some form accessible to all citizens is most important as exact memorials of events and personages notable in our national history and to be remembered with patriotic pride. Now therefore be it resolved by the Senate and House of Repre sentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Treasury be and is hereby required to have struck off at the United States Mint complete sets of all the National Medals of the classes above named. And in case a die or copy of any of such medals is not in the possession of the Mint, then the Secretary of the Treasury is 47 hereby required to procure the original medal or an authentic copy thereof, and to prepare a new die making an exact repro duction of the original. And the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby authorized and required to distribute these complete sets when made as follows : One set in the original metal as first issued to all the executive departments of the United States Government at Washington. One set in bronze to each of the States of the Union and the Territories, to be by them preserved accessible to the public in such form as the various Legislatures may prescribe. And the cost of dies, material and distribution shall be defrayed by the United States Mint at Philadelphia out of its contingent fund. This resolution was submitted to the Director of the Mint who approved of it, and was referred to the committee on coinage, weights and measures, and the only member of that committee who was referred to on the subject expressed himself as strongly in favor of it. Time, however, did not allow the resolution to be reported by the committee on coinage, &c, and voted on by Congress, but there was no reason to apprehend any opposition to the measure, especially as the Director of the Mint estimated that the expense would be very small and could be defrayed by the Mint out of its contingent fund. It is the intention of the committee to have the resolution again presented in the next Congress. And the object of the chairman of the committee in preparing this paper was to put clearly before the Society the purpose and scope of the resolution, and to set forth what seems to him its great historical and educational im portance, in the hope that every person who reads the paper may lend his influence and assistance towards the accomplishment of so worthy a project. A MEMOIR OF JOHN LEEDS BOZMAN, THE FIRST HISTORIAN OF MARYLAND. A Paper read before the Maryland Historical Society, May 9th, 1887, BY SAMUEL A. HARRISON, M. D. Graia quis Italicis auctor posuisset in oris Moenia, querenti, sic e senioribus unus Kettulit indigenis, veteris non inscius sevi.— Ovid. gnltinutrc, 1888. A MEMOIR JOHN LEEDS BOZMAN. cv Sfunb ^Publication, Qfta. 26. A MEMOIR OF JOHN LEEDS BOZMAN, THE FIRST HISTORIAN OF MARYLAND. A Paper road before Ibe Maryland Historical Fociely. May 9th, 18 87, SAMUEL A. HARRISON, M. D. Graia quis Italicis auctor posuisset in oris Moenia, querent!, sic e senioribus unus Rettulit indigenis, veteris non inscius aevi. — Ovid. $n\\\mrt, 1888. PEABODY PUBLICATION FUND. Committee on Publication. 1887-88. HENRY STOCKBRIDGE, JOHN W. M. LEE, BRADLEY T. JOHNSON. Printed uy John Murphy & Co. 1' It INTERS TO Til K M A K YL AND HISTORICAL SOCIETY. IiAl.TIMOUE, 1888, PREFATORY NOTE. In order that credit may be given where it is most justly due, it is proper to say, and to say distinctly, that much the greater part of what has here been related of both John Leeds and John Leeds Bozman, was derived from memoranda and private letters of that highly accomplished and most honor able gentleman, John Bozman Kerr, whose natural abilities, extensive learning and large acquaintance with Maryland History should have made him the successor of his great uncle. Other persons, most of whom have now passed away, were consulted with reference to Mr. Bozman's habits and appearance, and the information thus obtained has been cautiously used ; but for his character and opinions the chief reliance has been placed upon his own writings. The county records and newspapers have given but small contribution to our knowledge of a " life exempt from public haunt." His name has gained admittance into some of the Biographical Dictionaries, but the notices of him are exceedingly meagre and imperfect. JOHN LEEDS BOZMAN, THE HISTORIAN. THOSE who have rendered distinguished ser vices to their fellows, by thought, word or deed, are wrongfully deprived of half their just meed, however well they may have been paid in life with praise and more substantial reward, if their memories are allowed to perish from the minds of men. Nor are they alone the losers by such neglect, for states and communities suffer detriment, hardly to be measured, when they permit the recollections of their good or great or useful citizens to be effaced by " the tooth of time and rasure of oblivion : " for what spur or incen tive to finer natures is comparable with the hope of winning the more durable existence that the remembrance of after times confers, ancl what inspiration to others, less highly endowed, is equal to that afforded by lofty example held permanently 7 8 in view? If the objects of this Society are not misapprehended, one of its purposes is " to memorize And leave in books for all posterities The names of worthies and their virtuous deeds " — to perpetuate or, if dying, to revive recollections of those citizens of this State who, in the past, thought, wrought and wrote wisely and well — an object most worthy of your labors. That the Maryland Historical Society, with such an object before it, should not have attempted to trace the pathway in life which lay not along the thronged thoroughfares of the " city full," but, as it were, through the lonely recesses of primitive forest, and Avhich is now almost effaced by the falling leaves of time — that it should have made no effort to recover the lineaments, fast fading from the canvas where once they were so strongly drawn, of him who was the first1 to essay the task lThe only person that can justly claim precedence in time of Mr. Bozman as the first historian of Maryland was the Bev. Thomas Bacon, the compiler of the laws of the province, whose labors, as embodied in his great work, are hardly to be estimated. It may be well enough to state that Mr. Bacon was an uncle to Mr. Bozman by marriage, and from the compiler of the laws the historian of Maryland may have received the first suggestion or inspiration to attempt the work upon which his celebrity depends. The above is allowed to remain as written before the following attracted attention: "The earliest historian of Maryland was George Chalmers, whose Political Annals of the Present United Colonies was published in London in 1780 . . . His Account of Maryland is fair and for the most part accurate."— W. T. Brantly, in Winsor's Nairative and Orilical History of America, vol. III., p. 559. 9 upon which it has been engaged now this many years — seems strange, and. the more so in view of the laborious diligence that has been expended in following the aimless wanderings and in restoring the doubtful portraiture of less con siderable personages of the State. Under these circumstances, it is thought that the presentation of some account, imperfect as it may and must be, of Mr. John Leeds Bozman, the historian of the earliest years of Maryland, will not be out of place, and, perhaps, acceptable to students of Maryland history. The history of families, et nati natorum et qui nascentur ah Mis, of which local history is largely made up, has of late years acquired fresh interest, and this with others besides those whose vanity it gratifies by its record of descents from ancestors easily believed to be of gentle blood, and with those others who are pleased with the genealogical puzzles which it "helps to solve or complicates the more. Philosophy is using these family histories as furnishing data for the confirmation of those doctrines of heredity that have relations with so many departments of human knowledge, particu larly with anthropology in all its varied branches. For this and other reasons, a few words of the ancestors of Mr. John Leeds Bozman will be par doned. His family was of Dutch origin, and had for its founder in America William Bozman, the 10 immigrant — a man who is represented as having possessed great force of character. He is said to have been in the Chesapeake as early as 1627. He was later seated in that portion of the penin sula which afterwards became Somerset County, and this may be regarded as the home or solar of the family. He was appointed by Governor Calvert in 1663 one of the Commissioners to settle the boundary between Virginia and Maryland, and, in 1664, one of the Commissioners to grant warrants for land to persons desirous of removing from the jurisdiction of Virginia to that of Mary land. He held other positions of trust after the organization of Somerset County in 1666. A son of William Bozman was John, who rose to the distinction of being one of the Judges of the Pro vincial Court of Maryland, and from him sprang Thomas and llisdon Bozman, both of whom became residents of Talbot County. Pusdon Boz man, a man of large landed possessions, fixed his home at Sherwood, upon the Eastern bay, and here he acquired consideration and position in social and civil life. He is believed to have died without children.1 Thomas Bozman married Mary Lowe, the daughter of Colonel Nicholas Lowe, of Oxford Neck — a gentleman who at one time or 1 Wide flats just within the Eastern bay, bordering upon this estate, are known to sailors and fishermen as the " Bozman Flats," and a town in a situation not remote has very recently been laid off, which has received the name of " Bozman," but more in honor of the historian than of his family.' 11 another was Clerk of the County, High Sheriff", Member of the House of Burgesses and Colonel of the Militia. By his wife Colonel Thomas Bozman acquired a large estate in Talbot, upon a portion of which, subsequently, but long after his death, known as Belleville, he settled, and this became the seat of the family, passing through a collateral branch from its possession as late as 1874. He occupied many places of honor and emolument in the county and province. He was High Sheriff, a Commissioner and Justice of the Peace, the Deputy Surveyor General, Deputy Com missary General for the Eastern Shore, Colonel of Militia and a Vestryman of St. Peter's Parish.1 Few men of his day in Maryland were held in higher esteem. The son of Colonel Thomas Boz man and Mary Lowe was John, who, marrying Lucretia Leeds, the daughter of John Leeds, of Wade's Point, became the father of John Leeds Bozman, the subject of this sketch. At the risk of prolixity something must be said, 'Some of these official titles suggest to us of the present little of the honor and dignity they represented to men of a former time, for apart from the fact that the offices they designate were once of greater importance than they now are, it should be noted that in a, society essentially aristocratic and yet forbidden to use the only symbols of nobility that were known, ns was the case in provincial Maryland, official position conferred titular rank. Thus, names and places that would now be disdained by men of good social standing were sought after with avidity, as much for the distinc tion they conferred as for the emoluments they secured, and as the offices were largely monopolized by certain families, the titles assumed a kind of hereditary character. 12 in connection with the Bozman genesis, of Mr. John Leeds, the maternal grandfather of the his torian of Maryland, for to this source, perhaps, may be traced the inclination to letters and science which he displayed. Mr. John Leeds, now almost forgotten, was held in much esteem by his contem poraries for the purity of his character and his very respectable attainments. He was the son of Edward Leeds, of Wade's Point, in Talbot County — a property which he inherited from his father, Captain William Leeds — a Puritan in religion, a contemporary of William Claiborne, a resident of Kent Island and a representative, in 1661, of Kent County in the House of Burgesses. Captain William Leeds, who died in 1708, was the son of Timothy Leeds, the immigrant, who came to Virginia with Newport's expedition.1 John Leeds was born, according to the Quaker notation, on the 18th of the fifth month (July), 1705, and, his father dying soon after, was left to the care of his mother — a woman of strong sense as well as purity of character — who, having embraced the doctrines of the Friends, gave to the mind of her son a religious impress that was never lost, though he soon ceased all communion with these people. Of his education nothing whatever is known except that it was obtained wholly in Maryland — he 1 As mentioned in Smith's History of Virginia, vol. I., p. 172, Richmond edition of 1819. 13 never having been sent abroad, as the sons of wealthy planters and merchants often were. It may have been received under the tuition of one of those teachers who were purchased from the ships as indentured servants, for some of these were men not so ignorant and depraved as their forlorn condition might indicate ; but in view of the extremely defective instruction that was im parted at that early time in the province — in view, too, of the small encouragement that was given to the prosecution of liberal studies in such a primitive society as then existed in Maryland, and, finally, in view of the really respectable attainments of Mr. Leeds — we arc justified in believing that he possessed a natural aptitude for learning which overcame educational deficiencies and a taste for letters that could not be extin guished by the rudeness of his environments. A kinsman, writing of him, said: "Though educated solely in Maryland, few among his cotemporaries had higher, claims, by common consent, to rigid scholarship and more skill in the mathematics." It was on account of his proficiency in astronomy and geodesy that he was appointed by Governor Sharpe one of the Commission to supervise the work of the surveyors, Mason and Dixon, in laying down the boundary line between Pennsylvania and Maryland, which in subsequent years acquired such historic celebrity and momentous political 3 14 importance. Of him Governor Sharpe said in a letter: "I appointed Mr. Leeds to be a Commis sioner, and it was at my desire and request that he traveled and attended the other Commissioners. I did not think it safe with regard to Lord Balti more's interest to be without him, there being no other person I could procure to assist whose knowl edge of such matters I could rely on."1 It is hardly doubtful that the detection of some errors in the original survey was owing to his knowledge and accuracy. Mr. Leeds gave much attention to astronomy,2 but more particularly to optics, in which science his descendants claim that he made uiirevealed discoveries which anticipated many of a later day. The truth of this there are, of course, no means of determining. He possessed a valuable collection of philosophical instruments, some of which, after his death, came into the pos session of St. John's College and others remained in that of his grandson, Mr. John Leeds Bozman.3 1 Services which were so valued by Governor Sharpe and upon which Mr. Leeds himself placed no slight estimate, for his accounts show that he demanded an extra allowance of a guinea for each day of one hundred and seventy-seven that he attended, are strangely ignored by historians, who do not connect his name with this important transaction. 2 The Philosophical Transactions of 1769 contain a letter of his upon the Transit of Venus, occurring on the 3d of June in the same year. lie left behind him a large mass of astronomical calculations, which it was intended to submit to Mr. Bowditch for examination ; but the matter was delayed and the papers were destroyed. Of course, there are no means now of esti mating their value. 3 There is a tradition that the Maryland authorities, after the passage of the Confiscation acts in the Revolutionary era, laid claim to some of these In the year 1735 Mr. Leeds was appointed one of the Commissioners or Justices of the Peace for Talbot County, which position he held until the year 1738, when he was appointed Clerk of the County.1 In this place he remained for a great number of years, and while holding it he was, in 1766, appointed Naval Officer for Oxford, and at a later date, say 1773, a Judge of the Provincial Court. No office of the Provincial Government was of greater importance and dignity than this, except that of the chief executive, and his appointment to it must be regarded not only as a testimonial to his high character, but as evidence of his possess ing, in addition to his other acquirements, a good knowledge of law. He was also at one time Treasurer of the Eastern Shore. During the long controversy^ that was waged with the Royal Gov ernment by the American Colonics prior to the actual outbreak of the hostilities of the Revolu tion, Mr. Leeds counselled patience and peace; and he opposed all measures that seemed to tend to the rupture of the ties which bound Maryland to the mother country, and when finally these ties instruments, for the use of the College, as being the property of the Lord Proprietary. Mr. Leeds said that he had no objection to their going to the College, but that they were his own and refused to deliver them. Being, however, a non-juror, he transferred them to his grandson, John Leeds Bozman, by bill of sale. •Allibone, in his Dictionary of Authors, speaks of Mr. Leeds as the "Sur veyor General of Maryland." He was, probably, Deputy Surveyor General for tho Eastern Shore. 16 were declared to be sundered, he pronounced the act precipitate, ill-advised, morally and politically culpable. He refused to renounce his allegiance to the King of Great Britain, and to recognize as legitimate that government or those governments which had been set up upon the ruins of the proprietary and kingly rule. In other words, he became a Tory — a decided but inactive Tory. He refused to take the oath that was required of him, resigned all his official positions, even that of the Clerk of the Court, ancl retreated to the seclusion of his farm on Bfiy-Side.1 As the contest grew warmer and more embittered in the colony and his county, he apprehended that proscriptive measures would be adopted in Maryland against all those who opposed the current of popular sen timent. So he settled his private affairs prepara- 'The following lines, "occasioned by the oath refused by nonjurors, during the Hovolution/' though without poetic merit, are possessed of curious interest: The Honest man compell'd to take An Oath his heart cou'd never make. A Parody, By John Leeds, Esq. To thee O God 1 who knows the secret mind, Or, if to Virtue or to Vice inclined My cause I leave, and hope the just award, Who Vice can punish, Virtue will reward : If in the maze of these degenerate days I go, unwilling, into error's ways, Or if by wicked men compelled to run In paths reluctant, which I sought to shun, Impute the error to their damned decree Not to my heart, for that is wholly free. Addressed to James Dickinson, Esq. 17 tory to leaving the country, expecting to embark with Governor Eden on the ship Fowey ; but as the final step towards colonial independence was delayed, he was persuaded by kinsmen and friends of tho Whig or patriot party, among whom was a very near neighbor — the lion. Matthew Tilgh man {clarum et venerabile nomen) — to continue at his home, and, he consenting, here remained in unmolested retirement during the whole contest, giving offence to none by the obtrusion of his sentiments upon public or private notice, and enjoying, amidst the suspicion and acrimony that was engendered by the war, the confidence and con sideration of his fellow-citizens of whatsoever poli tical belief.1 Mr. Leeds maintained his opinions to the end of his life, and witnessing, not without self-approval, the failure of the government under the Articles of Confederation, he was confirmed in his belief that a lasting league of independent States was an illusion of political optimism, and that the only sure ground for stability was a con stitutional monarchy. He did not live long enough to witness the happy working of our " more per fect Union " under our new form of government, for he died soon after the adoption of our Con stitution,- in March, 1790, " fully impressed with 'He was referred to by the Rev. John Gordon, an ardent Whig, in a. sermon he delivered in 1774, during the time of the agitation produced by the Boston Port Bill, as "one of whom all had been so justly proud for his profound learning, for his excellence and purity of character." 18 the idea that the expenditure of lives and the waste of treasure might have been obviated by the recognition of a Colonial General Home Gov ernment under the mere prestige of British power and British laws."1 Mr. Leeds was exceedingly liberal in his religious views, for having imbibed from a Quaker mother Arian opinions, there was ground prepared in youth for the reception and growth of the seeds of Deism, which, in his maturer years, were scattered broadcast through out the world. It is known that, like most men of serious minds, he was led to a study of those profound questions of the origin, nature and destiny of man that lay at the basis of religious faith and practice, and, as connected with them, the dogmas and ceremonials by which different forms of religion are expressed and discriminated. His philosophic manner of considering such sub jects, which he adopted instead of the emotional which characterized the people among whom he had been piously bred, may have given rise to the opinion that he was atheistical. If the rigidly orthodox discovered in him something to condemn, the more tolerant of divergencies from a catholic faith saw at the bottom of his character a venera tion of that "power which makes for righteous ness." He was in communion with no religious 'John Bozman Kerr, in a manuscript history of the Chamberlaine family, part of which only has been published. 19 society, but held the Friends in great respect for the purity of their lives, and, like other men in whom the filial sentiment is strong though the religious belief is weak, because their faith and practice were those of an honored parent. Of the more intimate traits of Mr. Leeds' character and of his personal appearance, little or nothing is known : but that he possessed many amiable qualities of mind and heart is attested by the affection of his, immediate descendants, which is of record, and by the veneration of those more remote, which is based upon authentic family tradition. He was buried at Wade's Point,1 his homestead — a property which was taken up origin ally by Zachary Wade, one of Claiborne's com panions, and alienated by him when that worthy was driven from the province in 1647 ? Mr. Leeds left this property to his grandson, John Leeds Bozman, who made it his home for a sliort time during the early part of his life. To the same he bequeathed his library and philosophical instru ments. Mr. Leeds married, on the 14th of the ¦The land thus designated was directly across the Eastern Bay from Kent Point, where, it is claimed, was the seat of Claiborne's settlement. Its name is variously spelled. 4 Zachary Wade was one of the adherents of Claiborne in his resistance to the claims of Lord Baltimore. When this "evil genius," as Mr. Bozman calls him, but very improperly, was driven from Kent Island by Governor Calvert in 1647, he was one of those who "submitted themselves to his Lordship's government" and took the oath of fealty. — Bosnian's Hist, of Md., vol. II., p. 304 (note). 20 2nd month, 1726, Rachel Harrison, by whom there were born to him three daughters, but no sons. One of these daughters, Rachel, became the wife of John Bozman, as before mentioned, ancl the mother of the historian of Maryland.1 To conclude this long genealogical digression 1 This marriage was formally ratified, according to the simple ceremony of the Friends, at the Quaker Meeting house on Dividing Creek, near the town of Trappe— consecrated in the memory of these good people by the fact that near by, at the house of William Stevens, George Fox preached when in America in 1673, having among his auditors " the Judge of the County, three Justices of the Peace and the High Sheriff, with their wives. Of the Indians one was called their Emperor, an Indian King, their Speaker, who sat very attentive and carried themselves very lovingly." The certificate of this marriage may be here inserted as a curious relic of a primitive time : Maryland ss Where as John Leeds, Jr. and Rachel Harrison, Boath of Talbot county in the Province of Maryland, have Declared their Intentions of Marrying Publickly before severell Meetings of the People call'd Quakers in the aff'd County of Talbot, according to the good order used among them, whose proceedings thare in were approved By the said Meet ing, thay appering clear of all others: Now, these are to Certify all whome itt may Concern that for the full accomplishment of their said Marriage, They the said John Leeds and Rachel Harrison appeared in a Publick meeting of the afforesaid People, att their meeting house att Choptank this fourtenth day of ye Second Month In the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and twenty six, and In a Solemn Manner He the said John Leeds, taking the S'd Rachel Harrison by the hand Did Publickly Declare as followeth: Friends, in the fear of the Lord and Praying for Divine assistance, I take my friend Rachel Harrison to be my Wife, Promesing to be to her a True, Loving & AfFectionat Husband untell itt shall Pleas all mighty God by Death to separate us. And then and thare the said Rachel Harrison did in like manner declare as followeth : Friends, in tho fear the Lord and Praying for Divine Assistance, I take my friend John Leeds to be my Husband, Promising to be to him a True Loving and Affeetionat Wife untell itt shal I'lease all mighty God by Death to separate us. And the said John Leeds and Rachel Leeds, she now according to the Custom of Marriage, Assuming the name of Her Husband, as a further Confirmation did then and thare to these Presents sett their Hands, and we whose names are here unto subscribed being Present Att the solemnnizing 21 and to return to the subject of this memoir, it may be stated that there is no difficulty in tracing atavic influence in the forming of the mind and character of John Leeds Bozman. It has been shown that he came from ancestors that were not only reputable, but mentally well-endowed, some of the said Marriage and Subscription aflbre said, as witnesses, Have to these presents sett our hands the Day and Year above writen. John Leeds Junr Rachl Leeds. Samuel Dickinson, John Powell, Ruth Richardson, Will. White [?], William Harrison, William Lewis, Henry Troth, Chas Dickinson, W™ Dickinson, Solomon Edmondson, Peter Sharp, Christopher Birkhead, Dan'.Powell, Joseph Wray, How" Powell, Solomon Sharp, Walter Dickinson, Henry Sharp, John Gorsuch, John Stevens, W'« Sharp, Howell Powell, Jr., W"? Edmondson, Peter Webb. John Kemp, [The names of the women are all written by one person]. Rebeckah Dickinson, Susanah Powell, Jun., Elizabeth Harrison, Sarah Webb, Ann Harrison, Ester Edmondson, Susanah Powell, Sarah Webb, Jun., Suffrah Dickinson, Mary Horney, Sarah Powell, Magdalen Stevens. Under the name of his wife upon this certificate John Leeds wrote with touching simplicity: "She died 10th May 1746 having well and faithfully performed her covenant." In the handwriting of Mr. John Leeds Bozman, upon the paper enclosing this certificate, which he seems to have treasured with filial piety, was an endorsement which effectually settles a disputed point of biography, namely, the birth-place of the celebrated John Dickin son, author of " Farmer's Letters," and of General Philemon Dickinson, of 4 of whom possessed a culture rarely to be found in a new and sparsely settled country remote from those influences that are helpful or stimulating to intellectual effort. How far his example proves the doctrines of heredity, this is not the place' to consider. John Leeds Bozman, the son of John and the Revolutionary Army, both of whom, as will appear, were the kinsmen of Mr. Bozman. The following is the memorandum : " The within Rachel Harrison, to whom my grand father John Leeds was married, according to the enclosed certificate, was one of the daughters of William Harrison and Elizabeth his wife, whose estate and place of residence lay in Talbot County, on the Choptank river contiguous to the place called Barker's Landing. The said Elizabeth Harrison's maiden name was Dickinson. She was the only daughter of William Dickinson, of Talbot county, mer chant, who died in 1718 and left Samuel Dickinson his eldest son and heir at law. Samuel Dickinson by a first wife, had Henry Dickinson his eldest son & heir; but by a second wife (who was a sister of Doc' Cadwallader of Philadelphia) he had two other sons, viz, John Dickinson, (celebrated for his Farmer's letters) and Philemon Dickinson, commonly called General Dickinson of the State of New Jersey. The plantation and residence of the present Doc1 Sam' Dickinson, a grand son of the above mentioned Henry (lying on Choptank) [and still, 1887, possessed by a lineal descendant] has been transmitted to him from his great grandfather, the above mentioned Sam\ Dickinson, and was the family seat of the above mentioned Samuel the Elder. These facts appear from a copy of a deed of release (in my grand fatber, John Leeds' hand writing) which appears to have been given by him to the above mentioned Sam' Dickinson, the elder and son of AVilliam, in the year 1734, for his wife Rachel's distributive share of her grand-father's, William Dickinson's, personal estate, her mother Elizabeth Harrison, being then dead. Her distributive share for which the Release appears to have been given amounted to 100 pounds sterling and 50 pounds currency. "John Leeds Bozman "Sept. 1th, 1814." It may be added, though nothing more is needed, that recent investiga tions prove incontestably that both John Dickinson and Philemon Dickin son were natives of Talbot County, and, therefore, that this County and this State of Maryland are entitled to a portion, at least, of the honors that are reflected from these illustrious names. 23 Lucretia (Leeds) Bozman, was born upon the estate subsequently named Belleville, in Oxford Neck, Talbot County, Maryland, on the 25th of August, 1757. Of his early life little or nothing is known. It was, probably, that of a country boy of the present — lonely, idle and monotonous. His father dying when he was but ten years of age, he was fortunate enough to fall under the care of his maternal grandfather, William Leeds, who directed his education. After primary in struction at home, he was sent to Back Creek Academy, afterwards Washington Academy, in Somerset County, a school of high reputation in its day. At a suitable age, when he had made proper progress in his studies, he matriculated at the Pennsylvania College, now the University of Pennsylvania, where he made a complete course and was regularly graduated. It having been determined that the profession of law should be his calling for life, he was in 1777 entered as a lawyer's apprentice with Judge Robert Golds- borough,1 the fourth of the name, of Myrtle Grovej ancl after the close of the war of the Revolution, he was, in 1784, sent to England for the com- 1 There is a tradition pretty well established that while an apprentice to Judge Goldsborough at his seat in Talbot, he met with Miss Callisla Callister, whose charms may have inspired a tender passion in his breast, and whose death certainly inspired some threnetic stanzas, which were printed in the Port Folio, and acquired considerable vogue in their day, but are now justly forgotten. 24 pletion of his legal studies. He was entered as a student at the Middle Temple, London, his grand father defraying the necessary expenses attending his residence abroad. His most intimate com panion in London was Mr. William Vans Murray, of Dorchester County, also a student of Middle Temple, who subsequently rose to distinction in political life, becoming not only a member of Congress but a Minister at the Hague. With him Mr. Bozman maintained a personal ancl epistolary correspondence until the death of Mr. Murray ; and some of the letters of these friends, recalling incidents of their life in Fig Tree Court, where they had their chambers, indicate that they were not so absorbed in study as to decline par ticipating in the gaieties, or if it must be told, the dissipations of the great city. After spending several years at this school, " mastering the law less science of our law," he returned to Maryland and Talbot, was admitted to the bar, and entered upon the practice of his profession in the various courts of the State and county. He served as Deputy Attorney General under the eminent Luther Martin, his Avarm friend and associate, from the year 1789 to 1807, but it is believed he never held any other office of trust or profit. It does not appear that he acquired any great distinction as an advocate, but he was held in high esteem for the extent of his legal erudition 25 and for the soundness of his professional judg ments. His abilities and tastes fitted him for the calm and quiet duties of the counsellor, or better still for the deliberate decisions of the judge, rather than for the stormy contests ancl fallacious plausibilities of the pleader. Some of his law papers, presented to the General Court and the Court of Appeals, are said to be drawn up with extraordinary acumen and research. A kinsman, perhaps too partial, has said that a paper of Mr. Bozman, presented to the Court of Appeals by one of the counsel in the case of Martin dale and Troupe, familiar to most legal gentlemen of this State through "Harris & Mcllenry's Re ports," where it is inserted without name, is an actual monument of abstruse law, learning ancl forensic dialectics ; that he had heard a most capable scholar and jurist declare that he had frequently resorted to its logic in his pleadings before the Supreme Court of the United States, and had taken occasion to say, in the presence of the same august tribunal, in his ignorance of its true author, that there was but one mind capable of such depth of reasoning — the distinguished Marylander, William Pinkney. As to the just ness of this estimate, a layman is incapable of determining; but it is allowable to quote the words of as severe a critic as any — Mr. Bozman himself — that the argument in this case, first set 26 forth in a pamphlet published by him in 1794, hereafter to be noticed, "was then deemed, by most gentlemen of the profession of the law in Maryland, to have thrown light upon a very intricate subject, and to have been, without doubt, the foundation of the reversal in the Court of Appeals of a judicial decision thereon in the General Court."— (Bozman MSS.) Some essays on legal subjects, presently to be noticed, give evidence of excellent equipment for the conflicts of the courts ; but where1 agility, of mind is so important a qualification for success, it is probable the weight of his own armor Avas a burden and the length of his own sword an embar rassment. Situated, as he Avas, in a small and poor community remote from the great centres of population ancl commerce, it is not astonishing that his practice at the bar Avon for him neither munificent emoluments nor dazzling honors ; and, therefore, it is not to be wondered at that a man such as Mr. Bozman, whose fortune, moderate as it was, relieved him from the necessity of pur suing his profession for a livelihood, and one who felt his own capabilities for winning the higher prizes and palms, if such had been offered for competition, should have abandoned his profes sion to give himself up to those pursuits which, if they Avere not more, remunerative, Avere more pleasurable than the petty disputations of the courts or the monotonous routine of the office. 27 It is not knoAvn when he finally abandoned legal practice ; but he had always been glad to escape the turmoil ancl contention which it in volved, and find refuge in the tranquil retreats of literature and science. Cut off, as he was, from the aids and resources of literary culture, privileges enjoyed by residents of the cities — collections of books and intercourse with learned men — he spent his life in the seclusion of his farm, and the income of a moderate fortune and profes sional practice in accumulating a library Avhich for the day might be called extensive, and for any clay choice and valuable. This library, be queathed to his nephew, the Hon. John Leeds Kerr, sometime Senator of the United States, came into the possession of Mr. John Bozman Kerr, Member of Congress ancl Minister Resident to Central America, ancl was sold within a few years past in the City of Baltimore. It indicated the wide scope of Mr. Bozman's reading, embracing, as it did, the best productions of all time without excluding the current literature of his clay. Besides being well-read in English literature, he appears to have been an accomplished classical scholar and to have possessed a fair knoAvledge of the French language. The natural sciences, too, claimed his attention ; but that of botany seemed to possess for him the greatest interest — as much, perhaps, because it allied itself Avith agriculture, 28 of which he was, in common with most gentlemen of his day in his county, a diligent practitioner, as because its objects presented themselves to his notice in his daily Avalks ancl demanded more than admiring notice. But what may be called the sciences of man — those that relate to history and government, ethics ancl morals — engaged his attention more than any other during his maturer years. He says of himself: "Whenever the author's occupation in life permitted his indulgence in any literary pursuit, that of history always pre sented to him the greatest attractions." His information, however, was extensive upon most subjects, and it was said of him that he Avas " respected as a man of learning among learned men." ' But Mr. Bozman was not content to enjoy the productions of others without attempting to add something of his own to the repast that is spread by generous minds for the refreshment of all. In his day " the mob of gentlemen who wrote with ease " was not so large as at present. Jour nals and other periodicals did not so abound as now, inviting and rewarding literary labor of every 'The following is from a letter dated August, 1793, to his friend, William Vans Murray: "... I was, just before my late illness, deep in physiog nomy. I had lately bought a London abridgment of Lavater's Essays. I know no book that leads a man to such thorough investigation of himself in what I would call a philosophic point of view — that is, as an Animal. It is a science hitherto but little explored ; but depend on it, that before many centuries are past, deep researches will be made in it. 29 sort. He exercised his pen industriously and pleasurably, but not gainfully. He occasionally dallied with the Muses, particularly in early life, and even when engaged in serious work he Avas fond, in his moments of relaxation, of exercising the gentle art of versification. There are still extant effusions of his, both in print and in manu script, that evince some skill in verse-making, but none of the divine afflatus. A few of these Avere thought to be of sufficient merit to gain insertion in the Morning Herald of London and the Port folio of Philadelphia ; but they are strained in sentiment and artificial in construction. They are only valuable as literary curiosities, so none of them need be here presented to prove his Avant of " the vision and the faculty " of the true poet.1 He Avas a contributor of articles upon subjects of current discussion and temporary interest to other journals of the large cities. These articles were apparently welcomed by the editors, as they drew attention and sometimes provoked controversy. He did not disdain to write for the Eastern Shore Herald, the little weekly journal that began to be issued in 1790 in the town of Easton and was edited by James Cowan — the first newspaper pub lished upon the Eastern Shore and the third 1 An ode on the Discovery of the Georgian Star, an Elegy on the Death of Miss O. C. [Callista Callister], and u translation of Milton's elegy on the Return of Spring, are his best and those from which he derives the least discredit as a poet. 30 printed within the bounds of the State of Mary land. Many of his communications, over the signature of Hortensius, are now recognizable ; but many others, anonymous or pseudonymous, are not distinguishable. Those that are known to be his are valuable as giving us an insight into his character, for they exhibit him in his more familiar moods.1 But besides these fugitive pieces, Avritten for his oavh or others' mental diversion, or to serve some temporary purposes, he Avrote several labored essays upon legal, politicjil and social subjects. The first of these was entitled " Observations on the Proposed Bill, entitled ' An Act to declare and explain the LaAV in certain cases therein men tioned,' " ancl was contained in a pamphlet of forty-three pages, printed by James Cowan at Easton in 1794. This was drawn forth by the introduction of a bill to "remedy the consequences of the decision of the General Court in the case of ejectment of Martindale versus Troop," reported in 3 Harris & McIIenry, 244, and was a statute of limitations. As before mentioned, the ar&rrLen1> of T/£eJ?wntIIoii0iuriDie Cceciliw Cotuet-t Jiardn.Baiteinore de Jfatf&fricn-e- m. the. tiJiddvaloiV in -d/nerica. A,U»n B. Co. Llilt . Null THE CALVERT PAPERS. NUMBER ONE. 3funb-12Publtcalicm, ISla. 28. THE CALVERT PAPERS. NUMBER ONE. With an account of their recovery, and presentation to the Society, December iotti, 1888. Together with a Calendar of the Papers recovered, and Selections from the Papers. gHlliuiore, 1689. PEABODY PUBLICATION FUND. Committee on Publication. 18 8 8-89. HENRY STOCKBRIDGE, JOHN W. M. LEE, BRADLEY T. JOHNSON. Printed iiy John Muitpnv k Co. 1' It I N T K It S TO THE MAKVI.iMIl II I S T 0 K I C A I, S O 0 I K T Y . Ii A L T I M O U K , 1 « M 'J . CONTENTS, Address of Mr. Albert Ritchie, 9 Remarks of Mr. John H. B. Latrobe, 22 Report of Mr. Mendes Cohen, 22 Remarks of Dr. AVilliam Hand Browne, 32 Exemplification of the Arms of Sir Georoe Calvert, 38 The Patent of Nohility of Georoe, Lord Baltimore, 41 The Will of Sir George Calvert, Lord Baltimore, 48 The Inventory of the ICstate of the same, 50 Tender jiy Cecilius, Lord Baltimore, of the fiust year's Rent, - - 54 Receipt for the first year's rent, 54 A Calendar of the Calvert Papers, by Mr. John W. M. Leu, 57 The Calvert Papers. First Selection, - 127 PREFACE. At a meeting of the Maryland Historical Society, at their rooms, on December 10, 1888, the Calvert Papers were for mally presented to the Society. An account of the search for, discovery, and acquisition of these papers is given in the following addresses, made by Mr. Albert Ritchie on behalf of the donors, and by the President on behalf of the Society, together with the Report of the Committee on the Calvert Papers, made by Mr. Mendes Cohen ; and some remarks on their character, accompanied by the reading of Extracts, were made by Dr. William Hand Browne ; and to these have been added a Calendar of the Papers prepared by Mr. John W. M. Lee. THE CALVERT PAPERS. Address of Mr. Albert Ritchie. Mr. President, — ON behalf of those who have recently secured possession of a valuable collection of histor ical papers from an immediate descendant of the Calverts, I am here to-night to perform a most agreeable service. The papers referred to lie on the table before you, and I am instructed to present them to the Society of which you are the beloved and honored Pres ident. During the supremacy of the Lords Proprietary, they resided, as you know, at their homes abroad, and were represented here by their Governors. They, however, to a large extent, themselves exer cised the ample powers which they possessed, and maintained an active participation in the govern ment of the province. 2 0 10 Frequent and full reports of the condition of affairs were from time to time transmitted to them, as Avere also many important official papers requir ing their consideration and action. Thus, much of our history got upon the other side of the water ; some in the original, some in duplicate ; the original forming its own part of the record, and that in duplicate serving in some degree to supply the place of original material lost on this side. This collection was received from the possession of Col. Frederick Henry Harford, of Down Place, near Windsor, the great-grandson of Frederick, the last Lord Baltimore, and embraces all that is posi tively known still to exist of those papers that were sent over to the Lords Proprietary in the manner stated. You will remember that in his Calendar Index of 1861, Dr. John Henry Alexander states that in the year 1839 he saw, in the British Museum, two large chests, marked "Calvert Papers," but that, on inquiry made by him many years afterward, all trace of them had disappeared. The acquisition of the papers in those two chests has been an object of which the members of this Society have never since lost sight. Whether these are they or not, it is impossible yet to say. They may, or may not be. But much as we desire to possess those papers, it is rather to be hoped that 11 the records we now have secured are not the ones referred to by Dr. Alexander, because, if it be de termined that they are not, we will then be stimu lated by the knowledge that there are other histori cal treasures in the same line of search still to be looked for and found. The character of these papers will be told to you more in detail during the evening, but I may say in a word that it is believed that they will prove to be a historical treasure trove such as it has not been the good fortune of any other of the States to find, and that they will add much value to the collec tions already possessed by this Society. They will enable us to replace some of the lost leaves of the history of our State, to revise others, and to illumi nate many more. Without anticipating what will be better told you by another, I may, in passing, give a suggestion of the contents of these papers by referring to one or two of them. You know, sir, that the princely grant of lands and waters which comprised the province of Maryland, was given on the condition prescribed in the Charter, that the Lord Proprietary should in every year on Tuesday in Easter week yield and pay therefor the rental of "two Indian arrows of those parts." We are able to assure you to-night that at least the first year's rent was duly paid, for lying before you is the receipt of " W. Thomas, keeper of his Majesty's 12 Wardrobe," for two Indian Arrows " tendered ancl left at and within the Castle of Windsor," for "one year's rent due to the King's Majesty" for "a ter ritory or continent of land called Maryland," and dated on "Tuesday, the xxmrd day of April, 1633." For how many years the prompt payment of this rent continued we may not know, but we may pre sume that it was well kept up, because, from the failure of the native population to appreciate the principle of public law, that the discovery of the fact of their existence, gave the discoverer a claim to all their possessions, it was many years before Indian arrows became scarce in Maryland. Ulti mately, however, about the 4th of July, 1776, we know that this rent was docked. All that we pay now is the annual levy of $2.07 on every one hundred dollars worth of our property. Another paper of this collection, while not so unique, is of more historical value. It is a copy in his own handwriting of the instructions given by Cecilius Calvert to the immigrants before the Ark and the Dove left the Isle of Wight. These Calvert papers, after much search and effort, which will be more fully detailed by Mr. Mendes Cohen, were finally secured by a few of the members of this society, aided by some prominent citizens, and also, it is a great pleasure to add, with the gracious co-operation of several ladies who are with us to-night. 13 There is no need now to make special mention of the names of those for whom I speak, but I feel that I ought at least to say that, more than to any thing else, we are indebted for the possession of these papers to the intelligent and persistent efforts of Mr. Cohen. He will not, in his account of them, say this for himself, and I therefore say it, because it ought to be said by some one. The circumstances warrant the mention of one other name in this connection. Always an inter ested member of this Society and in sympathy with its work, one of the last acts of his life was a gen erous contribution to the fund for the purchase of these papers by Mr. T. Harrison Garrett. The acquisition of these Calvert papers ancl the interest manifested in them to-night, are an assur ance that our State has reached the age of historic research. This, of course, is a development of a somewhat advanced period, for the forces of moral evolution will not produce the historic sentiment until there is a history to be written. The condi tions are — a story to be told, and also the appropriate time for telling it. Unlike the observation of mate rial objects the atmosphere is cleared by distance, ancl the truth of history is better discerned as we get above and beyond the motives, the partialities and mists which obscure a closer view. These con ditions, like experience and good wine, come only by age. There is no improved method of hastening 14 them, and we must wait until the State has a past. The process may be going on, but we can simply stand by while seed time is ripening into harvest. But when the times have ripened for the pen of the historian, and existing conditions have created the want, the same forces which created the conditions will supply the want. Almost exactly two hundred years from the date of the charter had passed before the full period for writing the history of Maryland came, and then the great pen of McMahon was applied to the task. Bozman's Introduction to a History of Maryland had appeared in 1811, ancl Griffith's Sketches of the Early History of Maryland in 1821, but the publi cation of McMahon's first volume in 1831 may be taken, I think, as the well marked beginning of the period of historic research in Maryland. While that work was the evidence of a growth, it at the same time stimulated the growth. The presentation to the State of the manuscript of Bozman's history and its publication followed in 1834 ; then came the Act of 1835 for the rescue, arrangement and preservation of the State papers and documents. The Maryland Historical Society was incorporated in 1844 ; another Act looking to the preservation of the records was passed in 1847 ; in 1849 McSherry' s History appeared, and in 1855 the " Day Star " by Mr. Davis. In 1858 an Act was passed for the procurement of copies of important papers from 15 foreign repositories, and the report and calendar of Dr. Alexander followed in 1860. In 1867 import ant historical features were added to the Land Office; in the same year Terra Mariae, by Mr. Edward D. Neill, was published ; Scharfs History appeared in 1879, and the History of a Palatinate, by Dr. Wm. Hand Browne, in 1884. Many other incidents, as well as numerous monographs, which cannot now be referred to, have marked the period mentioned. The time had indeed come, but when the thought of the State turned to the history of the State, the inquiry was, what are the records? and (more diffi cult to answer), where are they? The archives have a history as well as the State, but though the acquisition of these papers is part of it, the full story cannot be told to-night. Maryland has probably always possessed a more complete collection of State papers than any other of the original States, and the State has always manifested as great an interest in their preservation as perhaps could well be expected. But we seldom find the instinct of the historian united with official position, and there never has been by the State a sufficiently well directed effort for the collection and preservation of its archives. They have passed through the perils of new gov ernment, of war ancl insurrection ; of removal, waste and neglect; of mould, fire and private spoliation. Very much, however, has survived ; much that had 16 nearly gone has been rescued, ancl means have been found to supply from other sources much that has been lost. A valuable work was performed by Mr. David Ridgely, State Librarian, under the Act of 1835, in collecting ancl arranging State papers and docu ments, but the Act unfortunately provided that after collection and repair they should be returned to the various public offices, from their exposure in which the effort had been to rescue them; ancl when looked for, in later years, many that Mr. Ridgely had noted could no longer be found. Immediately upon the formation of this Society it directed its attention to the collection and safety of the State papers, and in 1847 procured the passage of a resolution by the General Assembly to this end. This resolution authorized the Gov ernor to transfer to this Society all original papers, documents and records relating to the history of Maryland prior to the close of the Revolutionary war, which it was not necessary should be kept at the seat of Government. The first part of this res olution was full of promise and looked like a liberal transfer, but there was a string tied to the papers in the shape of a retractive proviso. Under the operation of the proviso there was very little left to be transferred except such documents as were in duplicate, or in such a condition of "apparent or manifest decay" as that they might be " ad van- 17 tageously deposited with the said Historical Soci ety." The Society thankfully received the records that were in a state of " manifest decay" and, as far as it was possible to do so, reverently restored them to a state of convalescence. By the Act of 1858, the Governor was authorized to appoint some person to procure copies of all papers and documents of value relating to the pro vincial history, which were to be found in the Colo nial Office in London, in the library of Zion College, and in the archives of the Propaganda at Rome. Dr. Alexander, who was appointed under this Act, very properly thought that before he began to copy it was important to know what the State already possessed, and accordingly, with the assistance of Dr. Ethan Allen, he prepared the first volume of a Calendar of State papers which is now in the library of this Society. But before the preliminary work was completed the appropriation was exhausted, and the hand of the type-writer has not yet gar nered the sheaves in question. The importance of the State papers was, again, most earnestly pressed upon the Constitutional Convention of 1867, by the late Mr. George L. L. Davis, and through his efforts a clause was inserted in the Constitution, making it the duty of the Com missioner of the Land Office to collect, arrange and classify the papers, records, relics and other memo rials connected with the early history of Maryland. 3 18 This Society at length, in the passage of the Act of Assembly of 1882, accomplished what had been a cherished purpose ever since its organization, namely, the transfer into its custody of all the records, archives and ancient documents of the Province and State prior to the acknowledgment of the independence of the United States by Great Britain, on the condition that they should be safely kept, properly arranged and catalogued, and that the Society should edit ancl publish such of them as were of historical importance, the State reserving its ownership, ancl providing for the free access to these papers of all its citizens. The State at last had appreciated the fact that it had no agency of its own suitable for the work of collecting, assorting and preserving these papers. Then began the reel ai nation of Stale papers from all conceivable, as well as inconceivable repositories. The search went through places where they ought to have been, and were not, and places where they should not have been, but were. Under the authority of this Act, and through previous efforts, the cellars, the lofts, the forgotten cupboards, the woodhouse of the Treasury ancl the dome of the State House, as well as the public offices, all gave up their historic treasures, and at last, so far, at least, as those possessed by the State are concerned, we are able to answer the inquiry, where are the records? They are in the iron vault of this Society 19 — the Home for Aged Papers — protected from exposure and neglect, secure against the hand of the spoiler, and safe from the depredations of the autograph fiend. This Society is faithfully and gladly discharging the conditions upon which it was made the reposi tory of these papers, and is now solving the problem of what the records are. The accumulations of a hundred, and fifty years, including about 10,000 sep arate papers, thus came into its hands. All are being properly assorted and catalogued, with due reference to subject matter and chronological order, and, with infinite labor, the worn papers, the faded writing, tho contracted hand, the long disused abbreviations, and the long since obsolete terms, are being deciphered and the entire text transcribed. Five volumes of the archives, under the scholarly supervision of Dr. Browne, have been published. Towards the expense of this work the State has made a moderate but inadequate appropriation. Much of the necessary service is gratuitous, while important gaps in the records have been filled from the collections of this Society, and by material gath ered abroad at its expense. This Act of 1882, from a historical standpoint, is the most important event that has yet transpired. It not only secured the safety of our State papers, but, through the agency of this Society, it is work ing out a full disclosure of their contents. To a 20 certain degree, in their past condition, they have been as if written in an unknown tongue. This Act, also, is leading up to a new, a more accurate and complete history of the State. The histories of Maryland heretofore written have been well done in view of the broken record and the difficulty of mining the material at command. But a new history of the State has been begun, ancl will appear in clue season. We may not know by whom it will be finished, nor whose name will be upon the title page as its author, but this Society has begun the work. It is now making accessible ancl capable of use the large stores which have been preserved ; it is replacing much that has been lost, ancl with an eye quick for the search, ancl a hand ready to reach, it is looking- for further historical riches in foreign repositories not yet explored. In thus preparing ready to his hand all materials, ancl in doing for the future author the most dreary and laborious part of his work, this Society is contributing its important part toward the new history of the State. It has assumed that portion of the task, which, as McMahon well said, " if inflicted as a punish ment, would be intolerable." Such, sir, is part of the work now being done by this Society, and it is in recognition of its active zeal, and of the service it is rendering the State, that we desire to place in its possession these Cal- 21 vert Papers. They begin the story of our people at a period earlier than the landing at St. Mary's. They had already opened the record when Leonard Calvert set up the cross on St. Clement's, and in the name of his brother, took possession of his unexplored kingdom of forest and river and bay. They have been singularly preserved through the casualties of two hundred and fifty years. The Barons of Baltimore, each in his turn, have played their almost royal parts, and the baronetcy itself has been extinct for more than a century. Eight generations, full of life and high impulse, have wrought their mission, and passed on. The first seat of government has disappeared, and not even its ruins now mark the spot where the early legisla tors assembled. From the little colony has grown a great State, superb in its free institutions, and the home of a million noble people. These parchments have survived through all these changes, ancl, by the force of association, they fill this hall to-night with voices and faces from the weird and majestic past, and stamp again with the vividness of real life, acts ancl events which were fading into shadow and tradition. With all their rich associations ancl historic value, I now have the honor to present them to you as the representative of the Maryland Histori cal Society, and, as I do so, it is with the thought that they are part of the muniments of our goodly 22 heritage of civil ancl religious liberty — part of the evidences of our title to all that is great and honor able in our past. Address of Hon. John H. B. Latrobe. Upon the conclusion of the address of Colonel Ritchie, the President, Hon. John H. B. Latrobe, said: I gratefully acknowledge, Mr. Ritchie, on behalf of the Maryland Historical Society, the valuable addition to its archives of the "Calvert Papers," Avhich the generosity and public spirit of some of our fellow citizens have enabled it to secure. To go now into more formal or extended remarks would consume time which may better be given to some matters immediately connected with the papers referred to. Address of Mr. Mem des Cohen. Mr. Mendes Cohen, Chairman of the Committee on the Calvert Papers, then addressed the meeting, as follows : Mr. President, Ladies and G-entlemen, — In the distribution of the duties of this occasion, it devolves upon me to tell you something in regard 23 to the finding of these papers. I cannot do so, however, without mentioning the name of one of our departed members, taken from among us in the midst of his usefulness more than twenty years ago ; one well known to the older members of the Society and to his fellow citizens generally, as a gentleman of the highest scientific and scholarly attainments. I refer to the late John Henry Alexander, LL. D. Dr. Alexander, amongst numerous other literary ancl scientific works, prepared an "Index to the cal endar of Maryland State papers," compiled under his own direction by authority of an Act of the Leg islature (January session, 1858, Chapter 27) . In the preface to this Index which bears date Easter Monday, 1861, speaking of the collections of Maryland documents in the British Museum, he records : "Many years ago, these possessions of the British Museum might have been increased, and with objects of great interest. In the autumn of 1839, there were lying in one of. its rooms, on the ground floor, two considerable chests marked Calvert Papers, which I myself observed with much inter est ; but presuming that they were an acquisition of the establishment, and would be shortly examined ancl reported upon thoroughly, or at least be there after forever accessible, I made no particular inquiry about them at the moment. It appears that this presumption was erroneous, ancl upon a diligent 24 research instituted recently — under the disadvan tage, to be sure, of there being not a single person left now in the employment of the institution, who was connected then with the particular branch of its service to which belongs the receipt ancl custody of such things, until they are handed over to be placed in their proper receptacles — no further intel ligence could be obtained about them, and no other conclusion arrived at than that, when seen they were merely in transitu, having been probably offered by some party possessing them, but at such a price as precluded their purchase. However this may have been, the mischance is very much to be regretted." It was my good fortune to know Dr. Alexander from my early youth. I was a student of engineer ing; he, the accomplished scientist and mathe matician, the intimate friend of an uncle who stood to me in loco parentis, was pleased on this account to take much interest in the progress of my studies, ancl subsequently in my professional career. I learned to respect the thoroughness with which Dr. Alexander pursued every investigation; the careful accuracy of his observation and the precision with which he noted results. I did not then know how rare were the qualities that I admired in him, nor how great was the privilege which I enjoyed in my intercourse with him ; but I have realized it since, and it is to me a great pleasure to say that we 25 primarily owe our acquisition of these papers to Dr. Alexander's careful methods — for I do not think that the search would have been thought of, as it would certainly not have been undertaken by me, but for that record of a failure to find what he believed to have existed a few years before. On reading that account for the first time and knowing something of the way which English people have of preserving written documents, I thought the chances were strongly in favor of Dr. Alexan der's theory, and that the papers had gone back to the attic corner whence they had emerged for their visit to the British Museum, and I promised my self the pleasure of searching them out as soon as opportunity permitted me a visit to England. In the meantime it chanced that, as correspond ing secretary of this Society, I was in communica tion with Mr. Winslow Jones of Exmouth, Eng land, a gentleman interested in matters bearing upon our history, and who has contributed to our collection some interesting notes in regard to the early Calverts. I ventured to ask his interest and co-operation in a search for the lost papers. He readily gave his assistance and through an inquiry made by him in Notes and Queries, information was elicited which led to our being convinced that a large mass of the Colonial Papers and correspond ence was still in existence and in the possession of Col. F. H. Harford, a retired officer of the British 4 26 Army, and a descendant of the last Lord Baltimore. Some months later Mr. Jones was permitted to see these papers at Col. Harford's seat, Down Place, near Windsor, and in May, 1887, he writes me : — : " I finished on yesterday the examination of the deeds and papers at Down Place " They were in utter confusion, in one very large chest, and not in the two in which they were origi nally kept, without any arrangement and mixed up with family papers unconnected with the Province, ancl very many of both sets without endorsement, but they are all now arranged and for the most part marked "The chest has for some years been in an old Orangery, now used as a potting house and for gar den purposes, and some signs of damp are on a few of the r papers, so that if the chest should remain for some years longer in its present place, the papers may be seriously injured." It is needless to recount our unsuccessful efforts to negotiate with the owners by a correspondence which extended over a year or more. We could neither learn the date of a single paper in the col lection nor the price at which any or all of them would be transferred to the Society. During the summer of 1887, Mr. D. R. Randall, of Annapolis, a corresponding member of this So ciety, being in London, was asked to call to see the papers which had by this time been removed from 27 Down Place to the custody of Col. Harford's solici tors in London. He did so, and was shown such of the collection as had then reached London. He was informed by the solicitors that some of the papers were still at Down Place, partly in the house and partly buried in a field adjoining. The papers referred to as being then in the house at Down Place, are said to have been brought shortly there after to London and to be included in our aggrega tion, but in regard to the buried papers the solici tors write: "We fear that they are lost beyond hope of recovery, as we understand from our client that they were buried some years ago by his gar deners in order to get rid of what at the time was supposed to be useless." At this stage it began to look as if the story of the Sibylline books might be repeated to our irremediable loss, and we felt correspondingly anxi ous to secure the existing remainder before any further diminution should befall them. It was evident that some one familiar with the Maryland Archives must be sent to London, to report speci fically as to the historical value of the find and to act as our agent. The most suitable person available was Mr. J. W. M. Lee, the Society's librarian. The late Mr. T. Harrison Garrett, in whose service Mr. Lee was then engaged, readily consented to spare him for the purpose. Mr. Lee sailed for England April 28 14th last. He reached London on the 21st, and lost no time after his arrival in examining the papers at the office of Col. Harford's solicitors, where it was stated to Mr. Lee, that all the papers known to be in existence were then collected. We were informed by each mail of the progress of his investigation, and in time, of the price placed upon them and of his estimate of their value. An agreement was arrived at without delay, and Mr. Lee was cabled to close the purchase which was at onqe effected through the mediifm of Messrs. Robert Garrett & Sons, who acted as our bankers, and advanced the necessary funds. Through the liberal subscription of the ladies and gentlemen who have just presented the col lection to the Society, sufficient funds were raised to defray the expenses of the mission as well as the cost of the collection and its transfer to your fire proof vault, where it was safely placed on the even ing of June 11th, 1888. There still remain for us the questions : 1st. Are these papers in whole or in part those which were contained in the two boxes seen by Dr. Alexander in the British Museum in 1839 ? 2d. What means the statement about the buried chest ? In regard to the first question it must be stated that our information is very meagre. We have not been able as yet, clearly to establish a con- 29 nection between the papers we now possess and the supposed contents of the boxes seen in 1839 ; nor has our agent, Mr. Lee, given us any informa tion throwing light on the subject. Nevertheless, I believe them to be the same. It is somewhat curious that whilst we in Maryland were wondering what could have become of these missing papers ; at the very time, when in 1861, Dr. Alexander was printing the document which records the facts that have led to the renewal of the search, our sister State, Virginia, in a search for evidence bearing upon the question of the boun clary between Virginia and Maryland, should have developed and recorded the fact of the then present existence of the papers which we now have before us. In March, 1860, the General Assembly of Vir ginia adopted a resolution " authorizing and re questing the Governor, if he should deem it expe dient, to send to England a competent agent to obtain from thence all record and documentary evidence tending to ascertain and establish the true lines of boundary between Virginia and the States of North Carolina, Tennessee and Maryland." Col. A. W. McDonald was commissioned as such agent, and proceeded to London, where he arrived June 20, 1860. In his report to Governor Letcher, dated February 2d, 1861, he states : " I sought out the representative of the Baltimore family, and finally discovered him a prisoner for debt in the 30 Queen's Bench prison, to which some twelve years since he had been transferred from the Fleet prison, after having been there confined for more than eight years. I obtained an interview with this gen tleman ; informed him of the object of my visit, which he appeared entirely willing to promote, and learned from him, after most minute inquiry, that the original charter had never come into his hands with the other family papers which had; that he had never seen it; never heard of it as being in the hands of any other person ; and that he verily believed said original charter to be utterly lost or destroyed." Shortly after our discovery of the papers my at tention was first called to this record by our fellow- member, Mr. Henry F. Thompson. It had there tofore seemingly escaped the notice of those inter ested in the Maryland Archives, as it certainly had my own, a fact which I can only account for by reason of Col. McDonald's report having been made just at the breaking out of our late civil war, at a period when all attention was concentrated upon the stirring events so rapidly succeeding each other almost before the eyes of many of us — a time when, in fact, our people were engaged in making History not in studying it. From this report of Col. McDonald, it will be seen that the then representative of the Calverts had been in prison for debt for at least twenty 31 years, or certainly since 1840, possibly from a some what earlier date. As it was only in 1839 that Dr. Alexander saw the chests, it would seem possible that the then representative of the family had offered them to the Museum before going to prison, either for sale or for safe keeping, and that the Museum declining to take them, they remained in the possession of the family during his imprison ment, and subsequently until our acquisition of them. If this be the case, as I have no doubt it is, it will only be necessary to obtain from the present representative of the family, or his solicitors, the facts doubtless in their possession to establish the identity of the papers before us with those in the missing boxes. Now, as to the story of the burial of a chest of papers. When that statement first reached me, I supposed that it might be a myth, due to the fact that when Mr. Jones found the chest of papers at Down Place, it was in an out-building — a potting- house — and may have been half-buried in the mould and debris of the gardener's work-shop. Mr. Lee was requested to make particular inquiry on this point, and to go, if necessary, to Down Place to ascertain the facts. This he did. He saw both Colonel and Mrs. Harford at their home, but could obtain from them no information more precise than that Colonel Harford had a few years before given authority to his gardeners to bury a box of the 32 papers, which were much in the way. The gar dener to whom this authority was given, was no longer in Colonel Harford's service when Mr. Lee was at Down Place, and Mr. Lee reports that Colonel Harford did not know -the place of burial, nor even if the authority to bury was ever availed of. The papers we have are so complete in some par ticulars, whilst lacking in others where we are pretty sure that the proprietors had received full reports from the Colony, that we cannot but feel that the chest supposed to have been buried may well have contained just what we find wanting. You have thus had a history of all we know, as yet, regarding these papers, and their re-discovery. It will devolve upon others to describe to you their interesting character and contents. In conclusion, I will only express the hope that some of our members, hereafter visiting England, will be sufficiently interested to investigate the questions still left open, whilst there remains a chance of finding those capable of answering them, thus completing and perfecting for our State a record of her early history, perhaps uneq nailed by that of any other of the thirteen colonies. Address of Dr. William Hand Browne. Dr. William Hand Browne, followed Mr. Cohen, with the reading of extracts from some of 33 the recently acquired papers, and with some intro ductory and explanatory remarks, as follows: As you have heard the story of the discovery and acquisition of the Calvert Papers, it remains to give you the briefest possible account of what they are. They consist of nearly 1,000 documents, on paper and parchment, all in admirable preservation, rang ing from the reigns of Henry VIII and Elizabeth, down to the second half of the last century. The most ancient document relating to Mary land is Cecilius Calvert's Instructions to the First Colonists, of which I shall speak more at large presently. We have the Conditions of Plantation of 1640; a series of Council-Books and of the Journals of the Upper and Lower Houses of Assem bly, filling many gaps in our collections ; also copies of laws transmitted to the proprietary for his assent. We have grants of land and rent-rolls of the various counties from 1640 to 1761. Here also is a great mass of documents illustrat ing every phase of the boundary dispute between Maryland and Pennsylvania, from the granting of the latter colony to the completion of Mason and Dixon's survey in 1768, with the maps submitted in the process of the suit; among which last are Mason and Dixon's own map, and a copy on vellum of the famous forged map on which Cape Henlopen 5 34 was misplaced, so that the southern boundary of Delaware was run some twenty miles south of the line agreed upon. We have a collection of receipts for the Indian arrows which the Proprietary was bound by his charter to tender every year at Windsor Castle; and among these the very first, of the date of 1633. We have some twenty documents, all new to us, relating to Avalon ; of which one is an inspeximus of the Charter in 1634, authenticated by the Great Seal of England. There are also several hundred letters from the Proprietaries, the governors, and other persons of consequence ; and many private letters of great interest, some of which throw curious light upon the obscure beginnings of the colony. The heraldic and genealogical parchments are curious and attractive. Among them we have the original patent of nobility creating George Calvert first Baron of Baltimore ; a beautiful piece of calligraphy and illumination, bearing the Great Seal of James I, and a miniature of that monarch. There are also several other heraldic scrolls, richly blazoned, relating to the Calverts and other families. There are impressions of the Great Seals of England, from Elizabeth to George III ; the Great Seals of Maryland, Virginia and New York ; the seals of several kings-at-arms, and others of less interest. 35 I am aware that all this is little more than a very imperfect fragment of cataloguing, neither complete nor entertaining; but under the circumstances it cannot be helped. The importance of many of these papers could only be made clear by an introductory explanation of the omissions they supply, the errors they rectify, or the obscurities on which they throw light. Others of less striking interest, are valuable as serving to fill gaps in a series which is now, I believe, more continuous than any of the colonial archives. But for this evening I have preferred to dip here and there into the mass for fragments, in themselves curious and interesting, which will require the least amount of preface. The first paper I shall bring to your notice is remarkable in two respects : It is absolutely the most ancient Maryland document known to be in existence (for although the charter is older, of that we have only official copies of later date) ; and it is also remarkable as clearly showing the intentions of the Proprietary with respect to religious tolera tion. You are all aware that there has been much idle discussion about this matter, many imperfectly informed persons dating Maryland toleration from the Act of 1649. We have now proof that this was from the first the purpose of the founder of Mary land; and that the Act of 1649 only formulated the policy which had ruled in the province from its very beginning. 36 The Ark and the Dove left Gravesend on October 18th, 1633, and proceeded to the Isle of Wight, where thev took on board Fathers White and Altham, and some others, and lay there until November 30th. Just before their sailing a copy of instructions from the Proprietary was sent to Leonard Calvert and Messrs. Hawley and Cornwaleys, the heads of the expedition, containing precepts for their gov ernance during the voyage and on their arrival. This paper is in Cecilius' handwriting, and from the interlineations and erasures is evidently the draft from which a fair copy was afterwards made. [See No. 1.] The next paper is a report by Governor Leonard Calvert of the circumstances attending the reduc tion of Kent Island — or rather of the trading post upon that island — in February, 1638. Two or three of the leading men at this post, which had been established for the purpose of trade with the Indians, by a firm of London merchants who had no grant of land from any source and whose representatives on the island were simply squatters — these leaders undertook to hold out against Bal timore's authority, so that he had either to throw up his charter, or compel them to acknowledge it. [See No. 9.] The next paper is a long letter written in Novem ber, 1642, by Cecilius to Leonard. We have scarcely 37 any writings from Cecilius except such as are of a purely formal character, and it is pleasant to find him here in confidential communication with his brother. The whole tone of the letter is affectionate, though the extract which I shall read is one in which he takes Leonard sharply to task for disobe dience of orders in granting land to certain parties contrary to his brother's express prohibition. [See No. 12.] The next is a very long letter written by Charles, son of Cecilius and governor of the Province, to his father in April, 1672. It is full of curious and interesting details about matters in Maryland ; but the time will not allow me to read more than a few sentences about the interchange of gifts between father and son. [See No. 14.] The last paper which I shall read is a holograph letter from William Penn to some Marylanders near the head of the bay. Notwithstanding the enormous size of the grant he had received, Penn cast longing eyes upon the Chesapeake, and was all his life trying to extend his boundary southward at Maryland's expense. Shortly after his charter had been signed, he wrote to Charles, Lord Baltimore, a letter full of friendly professions, asking and promising neighborly comity, and desiring that 38 their conduct toward each other might be regulated by the simple rule, " do as thou wouldst be done to." His next step was to write a characteristic letter to Herrman and other influential Mary landers in the north of the province, to induce them, partly by fair words, and partly by veiled threats, to revolt against Baltimore's authority. This letter I shall read. The original, as I said, is entirely in Penn's handwriting, and bears his seal as well as Herrman's indorsement. [See No. 19.] Among other interesting documents exhibited at the meeting, were the following : Exemplification of the Arms of Sir George Calvert. To All And Singvlar As well Nobles, and gentles as others to whom theis presents shall come Sir Richard St. George Knight Norroy Kinge of Arms of the North parts of the Realme of Eng land from the Riuer of Trent Northward send greetinge. Foras much as auntieutly from the beginninge the virtuous and worthy actes of excellent persons haue bene commended to the World, with sundry monuments and Remembraunces of their good deserts amongest which the cheifest and mostusuall haue bene the bearinge of Signes and tokens in Sheild3, called Amies which are evident demonstracons and Testimonyes of proues & valour dyuersly dis tributed accordinge to the qualitie and deserts of the persons merrittinge the same, which order as it was prudently deuised to stirr vp and enflame the harts of men to the Imitacon of Virtue, even soe hath the same bene, and yet is contynued to the intent that such as haue done Commendable Service to their Prince and Countrey either in warre or in peace, may therefore receiue due 39 honor in their owne Lyues and also deriue and contynue the same successiuely to their posterity for euer. Amongest which nomber for that I fynd the right Honourable Sir George Caluert Knight one of his Maiesties principall Secretaryes of State and his aun- cestors to haue recided in the North parts of this Kingdome, and not only to haue liued their in the Ranke and reputacon of gent: and bene bearers of such badges and Ensignes of honor amongest vs, but further haue seene an exact collection made by Mr. Richard Verstegan an Antiquarie in Antwarpe sent ouer this last of March 1622, by which it appeareth that the said Sir George is descended of a Noble and auntient familie of that Surname in the Earldome of flanders where they have liued long in great Honor, and haue had great possessions, their principall and aun tient Seate being at Warvickoe in the said Province, And that in theis later tymes two brethren of that surname vid : Jaques Cal vert Lord of Seuere two leagues from Gaunt remayned in the Netherland broyles on the side of the Kinge of Spayne and hath a sonne who at this present is in honourable place and office in the Parliament Courte at Macklyn, And Leuinus Caluert the other brother tooke parte with the States of Holland and was by them ymployed as their Agent with Henry the fourth late Kinge of Fraunce, which Leuinus Caluert left a sonne in France whom the foresaid Kinge entertayned as a gentleman of his bed chamber. And further it is testefied by the said Mr. Verstegan that the proper Armes belonging to the Familie of the Caluerts is, or, three martletts Sables with this Creast vizt the vpper parte or halues of two Launces the bandroll of the first Sables and the second, or. Nowe forasmuch as I have been required by the said Sir George Caluert Knight to make a true declaracon of what I haue seene concerninge the worthynes of his auncestors that it maye remayne to posterity from whence they orriginally descended as also that at this instant their is three of that Surname and lyniage lyvinge in three seuerall countryes beinge all men of great emenency and honourable ymployment in the State where they 40 Hue, which otherwayes by a generall neclect might in future tyme be forgotten and the honor of their auncestors buried in obliuion. And withall for a further manifestacoh and memoriall of the familie from whence he is descended. The said Sir George Caluert is likewise desirous to add some parte of those honourable badges and ensignes of honor which descend vpon him from his aunces tors their to those which he and his predecessors haue formerly borne here since their comminge into England. The premisses considered I the said Norroy Kinge of Armes haue thought fitt not only to publishe by the declaracon what hath come to my hands and Knowledge concerninge the honor of this worthy familie but also to add to the Coate of Armes which they haue borne here in England beinge paley of Sixe peices, or and Sables a bend counterchanged this Creast ensuinge Vizt : the vpper parte of two halfe Launces or, with bandrolls there to appendinge the one or the other Sables standinge in a Ducall Crowne gules as more playnly appeareth depicted in the margent and is the aun- tient Creast descended vnto him from his auncestors, The which Coate and Creast I the said Norroy Kinge of Armes doe-ratifie, approue and confirme vnto the said Sir George Caluert Knight and the yssue of his body foreuer bearinge their due and lawfull differences accordinge to the lawe of Armes in that case prouided. In witnes whereof I the said Sir Richard St. George Knight Norroy Kinge of Armes haue hereto put my hand and Seale of my office this third Daye of December 1622. In the yeare of the Raigne of our Soueraigne Lord James by the grace of God Kinge of England France, and Ireland Defendor of the fayth &c. the Twentith, And of Scotland the ffyftie and sixe. Rd : St. George Norroy. 41 Letters Patent Under the Great Seal of England, to Sir George Calvert, creating him Baron Baltimore of Baltimore in the Kingdom of Ireland. The entire space upon the parchment occupied by the Patent is about twenty-six inches in width, by seventeen inches in height. Of this space about eight and three-fourth inches in width by seven and one-half inches in height at the upper left hand corner (the dexter canton) is occupied by the initial letter J. The background of this part is black, but tas- sellated perspectively at the bottom in squares of black and white en riched with gold scrolled work — the whole edged with a plain gold band about one-eighth of an inch wide. The letter J is of blue, edged and beau tifully knotted with gold. The letter proper occupies but two sides of the square, and its foot runs into the mouth of the Dragon of the Tudors (tricked as a wyvern, vert, heightened with gold, and enflamed at the mouth, legged gules), which faces to the sinister and occupies the entire foot of the canton. In the open space between the initial proper and the dragon is the portrait of King James the First, three-quarters profile, facing to the sinister, sitting upon his throne, clad in a red mantle, doubled ermine, the small clothes and hose of white silk, with gold rosettes and trimmings (the right knee only showing ; the Garter does not appear). He is crowned imperially, and wears the Collar and George ; in his right hand he holds a golden sceptre surmounted by a fleur de lis, in his left the orb. The throne is of gold ; and behind it is a curtain of deep violet colour. From this initial letter there runs a bordure of the width of about three and one-half inches along the top and down the left edge of the whole de sign ; and also from the initial letter down the right edge — thus forming three sides of the entire work (the fourth side — the foot — being folded over and fastened down with the cords of the Great Seal which is affixed directly beneath the centre, pendent by a metallic cord passed in and out several times and sufficiently long to leave the Seal entirely clear of the parchment itself). This bordure is also edged in plain gold about one- eighth of an inch wide, and is beautifully ornamented with scrolls, urns, grotesques, and flowers, in gold and colours minutely detailed and skillfully done. The words "Jacobus Dei gratia Angliae" (except the initial J already referred to) are large and done in gold upon a blue stripe of 6 42 the width of about one and one eighth inches, extending from the initial letter across to the bordure on the right. All the lettering is in the usual Court hand, evenly and nicely done, and in black, save as above noted. On the upper strip of the bordure are three Heraldic trickings, viz: (1) — {dexter, and close to the initial letter) The crest of England [ — A lion gardant Or, imperially crowned, tail extended, statant upon an im perial crown gold, jewelled proper, the cap red, turned ermine] — all in front of a large escallop shell ribbed and shaded in blue. (2) — (sinister, and at the extreme right hand upper corner of the entire work) The crest of Scotland [ — A lion affronts gules, crowned imperially Or, in the dexter paw a sceptre erect, surmounted by a fieur de lis gold ; in the sinister, a sword azure, erect also, hilted and handled also of gold : sedant upon an im perial crown of gold, jewelled proper, the cap red, turned ermine] — all in front of a large escallop shell ribbed and shaded in blue, as before. (3) — (centre, and half way between the two crests) The Royal Atohievement [ — The Eoyal Arms, temp Jac. i, but not as ordinarily tricked, thus : quarterly grand quarters : i and iv, quarterly 1 and 4 England, gules 3 lions passant gardant in pale Or ; 2 and 3 France, azure 3 fieur de lis 2 and 1, Or : ii Scotland, Or a lion rampant, within a double tressure, flory counter flory, gules : iii Ireland, azure a harp Or, stringed silver — All within the Garter (dark blue with gold edges, buckle, and champet of gold, the letters Roman and gold also), the intervening space of red, ornamented with gold scroll work spreading out behind the Garter. Above is the imperial crown, of gold, the cap red, turned ermine. The supporters are (dexter) for England: a lion gardant (rampant against the Garter), Or, langued and armed gules, imperially crowned gold, the cap red : (sinister) for Scotland, a unicorn (salient against the Garter), sable, armed, crined, unguled, gorged with a marquif' coronet, therefrom a chain reflexed over the back and ter minating between the hind feet in an annulet, Or. Behind the dexter supporter are represented red and pink roses (but no white ones) with golden centres, growing from green stalks leaved proper, etc. ; behind the sinister supporter, green thistles with flowers purpure, growing from green stalks, thorned, and leaved green, etc. — The whole Atchievement standing upon a greensward coloured naturally and arranged perspectively] — It will be seen, by any one at all familiar with English coat-armour, that these three trickings depart considerably from the official blazon—notably (1) in placing England before France in the quartering, (2) in tricking the unicorn sable instead of argent, (3) in gorging the unicorn with a marquis1 coro net instead of the royal crown, and (4) in transposing the sceptre and sword 43 in the paws of the lion upon the Scottish crest. In the blazon above given exactness of detail has been sought, rather than mere technicality of terms. The Great Seal affixed is that of England, temporis Jacobi primi, in very dark green wax ; it is in a fair state of preservation, but somewhat flattened ; and the upper part is gone entirely. What is left of it is easily to be identified by comparison with other known examples of this Seal. 3acobii6 Dei gratia Hngliab i scocie ffrande et Hi- bernie Rex fidei defenfor etc., Item one paire of brafe Andirons ij" Item one paire of yron Andyrons topt ) w* brafe J VJ' Item firef hovell & tonges v" Item a payre of fnufiers bellowes and two hand-fkreenes of wicker Item two Tables xv° Item one window curtaine of Briftow ftuffe and other peeces of fuch ftuffe to line the windowes In the litle pafeage roome ioyning to a Chamber. Item one window curtaine of briftow ^| ftuffe wth fome other broken peeces of V the same J } In the Bedchamber ding belonging to it Item one green bedd laced and the bed- ) 52 Item two great green cheyres laced and two 1 litle cheyres futable to the said Bedd J Item one Cupbord covered w'1' green cotten Item two litle window curtaines and fmall \ peeces of ftuffe about the roome J Item one payre of Iron Andirons topt \v'.h brafse w'h fyre shovell tonges snuf fers & bellowes Item a table w'.h a green cloth carpett on it x" x8 In another bed chamber Item one halfe headed bedfteed w'.h a Canopy of Norwoh ftuffe & hangings of the fame about the room w'h a feather bedd boulfter & bedclothes to it and a table and one window curtaine Vllj" In a nother bedchamber Item one bedfteed w'.1' furniture of Nor- , w* ftuffe hangings Carpetts & two win dow Curtaines of the fame ftuffe wth a feather bedd boulfter & bedclothes to it Andirons firefhovell tonges bellowes fnuffers and a litle Table Item one Trundle bedd & bedding for 1 servants / In another chamber Item a halfe headed bedfteed a trundle bedd a Canopy of Norw0? ftuffe w'^ bed ding therevnto belonging and a window Curtaine ill" 53 In another Chamber Item one paire of Iron Andyrons fire- f hovell tonges bellowes fnuffers one win dow curtaine of Bristow ftuffe & litle peeces of the fame ftuffe w* a litle Table _, In the Garrett Item one bedfteed w'? a feather bedd & furniture to it two halfe headed bed- fteeds wtb flockbedds and bedclothes three Tables a prefe three Curtaines of darning two carpetts of Norw0^ ftuffe a paire of Andyrons fireshovell and tonges a paire of bellowes fower leather Cheyres and fower leather ftooles In the kitchin Item pewter and tynne vefeells Item vefeells of brafee & yron & other \ ymplements of the kitchin ) In the hall. Item a fettle beadd w'h a flockbedd and "") bedclothes to it three ioyned ftooles a firef hovell and tonges Item Lumbar in and about the houfe Item in ready money remayning in the " hands of the Lord Cottington and ST. W"? Af hton in truft for the vfe of fome of the younger children of the fd Lord Baltymore and difpofed of by his will Smmo totalis 1 . > 1 hui-us Inventanj ) > »Jm m/ vi Vlll 1" Xs IX VII XX11J" 54 This copy is duly tested by Gilbert Dethick, Notary Public, 1, ffeb. 1632-3. Tender of the First Year's Rent. [Indorsement] 23 Aprill 1633. Coppy of my letter | to the Deputy Constable | of Windsor Castle when 1 1 sent my first rent | of 2 Indian Arrowes for | Mary Land. | by John Langford. S' By a late grant of a Territory or continent of land called Mary Land in America, passed vnto me vnder the greate seale of Eng land I am to pay his MaUe at every yeare on the Tuesday in Easter weeke at his castle of Windsor two Indian arrowes : as a yearely rent for the said Territory. wo11 Arrowes I have accord ingly sent by this bearer my seruant to be payd accordingly. and I desire yo1 acquittance for the receipt of them so I rest Yor very louing freind. Receipt for the First Year's Rent. [Indorsement] 23 Aprill 1633 being Tuesday in Easter weeke. A certificate of the tendring of my rent to the King at Wind sor Castle for Mary Land : by the hands of John Langford. Tuesday the xxiii'h day of Aprill 1633 in the Ninth yeare of the raigne of o1 Soveraigne Lord King Charles. Memorand. that the day and yeare abouesaid the right honorable Cecill Lord Baltimore hath tendred and left by the handes of his Seruant John Langford at and in the Castle of Windsor in the Countie of Berk Two Jndian Arrowes for one yeares rent due to 55 the Kinges Ma"" this present day for a Territory or continent of land called Maryland in America granted by his Ma"" vnder the great Seale of England to the said Lord Baltimore vnder the yearlie rent aforesaid. Jn testimonie whereof we have herevnto subscribed the day and yeare abouesaid. W Thomas keep of his Ma"M Wardrobe James Euelegh George Starkey CALENDAR OP THE CALVERT PAPERS. PREPARED by JOHN W. M. LEE. 8 ARRANGEMENT. A. MARYLAND. Pagk I. Charter and Related Papers, - 6) 11. Colonization and Plantation, 62 III. Government : 1. Proclamations, Orders, Commissions, &c, 64 2. Council Records, 71 3. Assembly Records, ... 72 4. Laws, 74 IV. Land Records, Grants, &c, 76 V. Court Records, Wills, &c, 79 VI. Account Books, 81 VII. Indians, ... 83 /III. Virginia, 83 IX. Letters, 84 B. BOUNDARY DISPUTES: DELAWARE AND PENNSYLVANIA. X. Lands on Delaware Peninsula, - 93 XI. Extracts prom Records in England and America, - 97 XII. Penn vs. Lord Baltimore: 1. Court Proceedings, - ... . ioo 2. Agreements, - - 105 , 3. Appointment of Commissioners, - - 106 4. Commissioners' Reports, ..... 107 5. Surveyor's Reports, - - 108 6. Maps, - - - 109 7. Letters, - - - - - 109 8. Miscellaneous, - - - 111 XIU. C. AVALON. 113 D. THE CALVERT FAMILY. XIV. Grants, Deeds and other Documents Relating to Land, Ac., in England. Parchment, - - - 115 XV. Personal Letters. - - 124 XVI. Heraldic Documents, - - 126 59 CALENDAR OF THE CALVERT PAPERS. A. MARYLAND. I. The Charter; and Related Papers. 1632. June 12. The Charter. In Latin. 7 pp., fo. Two copies. Same. In English. 6 pp., fo. [Copies made about 1740.] 22 James I. March 4. Exemplification of the Patent for the Barony of Baltimore. Questions and Opinions as to Lord Baltimore's title to the Province (Calvert and Eden). The Charter of Maryland, together with the debates and proceed ings of the Upper and Lower Houses of Assembly in the years 1722, 1723, and 1724, relating to the Government and Judicature of the Province. Collected from the Journals and Published by order of the Lower House. Philadelphia. Printed and Sold by Andrew Bradford at the Bible in the Second Street, 1725. Sm. fo. Title, 10 pp., Preface IV, and Proceedings, 64 pp. The Lord | Baltemore's | Case, I Concerning the Province of Maryland, I adjoyning to Virginia in I America | with full 61 62 and clear Answers to all material Objections, | touching his Rights, Jurisdictions, and | Proceedings there. | And certaine Reasons of State, why the Parliament | should not impeach the same. | Unto which is also annexed, a true Copy of a Commis|-sion from the late King's Eldest Son to Mr. William | Davenant, to dispossess the Lord Baltemore of | the said Province, because of his adhe|-rence to this Com mon- Wealth. | London, | Printed in the Yeare 1653. Sm. 4o. Title. 20 pp.' 1751. May 4. Case under the will of Charles, fifth Lord Balti more. 3 pp., fo. 1751. May 30. Another case under same. 7 pp., fo. 1761. Jan. 31. Settlementof the Province of Maryland pursuant to Marriage Articles. [Another Copy. Parchment.] Notes on the Marriage Settlement of Frederick, Lord Baltimore. 1805. Mch. 15. John Clapham: Affidavit about quit-rents due Henry Harford in 1774. II. Colonization and Plantation. 1633. Nov. 13. Instructions of Lord Baltimore to the first emi grants. [In the handwriting of Caecilius, Lord Baltimore.] 1634-5. The Lord Baltimore's declaration to the Lords, about Molestors of the old Virginia Company. 1649. July 2. Duplicate of his Lordship's last Conditions of Plantation. [On three sheets of parchment.] 1650. Aug. 6. Declaration of Caecilius, Lord Baltimore. [Parchment.] 63 163 ? The Lord Baltimore's Declaration about his Patent and Molestors of the Old Virginia Company. 16 ? Heads of Inquiry relating to Maryland by Com missioners of Trade and Plantation to Lord Baltimore. Government of the Province. 1664. Sep. 1. Copartnership between William Allen and Henry Sewall, for^the manufacture of Muscovy Glass or Slade (Mica) in the Province of Maryland. [Parchment] A Release of Maryland Land to uses. [Unexecuted. Parchment.] 1690. ? Petition of Charles, Lord Baltimore, to the King for a confirmation of his grant, notwithstanding - the words " hactenus inculto." 1704. Queen Anne. Erection of Annapolis to a city. [Imperfect.] 17 ? The several reasons assigned by the Assembly — the following answers woh occurred to me to make to the Reasons. Conditions of Plantation. 1749. Petition of Charles, fifth Lord Baltimore, to House of Commons. Paper Bills of Credit. 1753. Jan. Petition of Caecilius Calvert to Lords of the Treasury, asking return of arms and ammuni tion furnished the expedition to Canada. 1753. Aug. 23. Copy ofthe Proceedings ofthe Parochial Clergy of Maryland at a meeting at Annapolis. 18 pp., fo. 1753. Oct. Account of what passed at a meeting of the Clergy at Annapolis. 14 pp., fo. 1754. Jan. 5. Answer to Address of Clergy. 1754. July 3. Capitulation granted by M. de Villier to the English troops in Fort Necessity. 1758. July 12. Report of Commissioners of Trade on Petition of Assembly. Exportation of Corn. 1758. Aug. 23. Letter from Wm.'Sharpe, clerk of Privy Council, to Lord Baltimore accompanying same. 64 1757-1758. Muster Roll of Maryland Forces, Fort Frederick. Attested by Gov. Horatio Sharpe. 29 Sep. 1759. 1757-1758. State of Accounts of David Ross, for sums due him on account of Maryland Forces. 1758. Sep. 16-19. Answers to Queries published in the London Chronicle. Tax on Lord Proprietor's Lands. 1762. Answer to Remarks on the Upper and Lower Houses. 1763. Nov. 17. Answers to Queries relnting to the Police and Government of Maryland published in the Public Ledger. [Imperfect.] 1764. An Account of the Paper Currency or Paper Bills of Credit that have been issued since Jan. 1749. The Right of the Inhabitants of Maryland to the Benefit of the English Laws. Annapolis, 1728. Sm. fo., 35 pp. Preface signed by D. Dulany. III. Government. Subsections : 1. Proclamations, Orders, Commissions, etc. 2. Council Records. 3. Assembly Records. 4. Laws. 1. Proclamations, Orders, Commissions, etc. 1658-1681. Book of Presidents [Precedents]. Small folio. 32 pages. Contents : 1658. July 15. Commission to Samuel Telghman as Admiral. 1681. Sep. 6. Commission to Judge Testament ary to use coercive power. 65 1672. Nov. 20. Commission to Judge in Testa mentary Cases. Oath of Governor. " " Chancellor. " " Councillor. " " Lord Proprietary's Secre tary in Maryland. 1657. Nov. 18. Proclamation and Oath of Sub mission. 1658. Aug. 12. Commission to Receiver General. " " Instructions " 1671. July 29. Charles Calvert, Governor, Com mission to Philip Calvert upon the Governor's leaving for Eng land. 1660. June 24. Revocation of Fendall's Commis sion. 1660. " " Commission in event of death of Governor. 1656. Nov. 10. Instructions to Receiver General. 1660. Aug. 24. Proclamation to apprehend Fen- dall. 1660. " " Proclamation excluding Gerard and Fendall from pardon. 1669/70. Mch.21. Instructions. 1660. Sep. 16. Private orders. 1660. June 21. Revocation of Fendall's Commission, [parchment] 1665/6. Feb. 16. Instructions to Charles Calvert, Governor, and the Council. 4 pp., folio. 1665/6. Mch. 9. Same to same, about Acts to be passed. 4 pp., folio. 1667. Oct. 30. Thelling's Orders. Cessation of Tobacco planting. 1669. July 29. Commission left by Charles Calvert, Governor, on leaving for England, to Philip Calvert as Deputy Governor. [Parchment.] 9 66 1669-1670. Instructions about Settlement of the Seaboard. Sm. folio. 7 pages. Contents : 1669. July 28. To Charles Calvert, Governor. 1669. Oct. 22. Council Proceedings on above. 1669. Nov. 26. Letter from Jerome White to Col. Lovelace. 1669/70. Mch. 20. Instructions to Charles Cal vert, Governor. 1674. June 1. Conditions of Plantation. 1685. Aug. 10. James II. Instructions to Charles, Lord Baltimore. Navigation Act. Signed by the King. 1715. George I. Instructions to Lord Guilford, guardian of Charles, fifth Lord Baltimore. Forms for entry and clearance of vessels. 1722-1736. Instructions from Charles, Lord Baltimore. Sm. folio. 18 pages. Contents : 1722. Dec. 5. To Nicholas Lowe. 1723. Feb. 23. " same. 1723. Sep. 27. " same. ? ? " same. ? ? " same. 1728. Apl. 5. " same. 1733. June 18. " M. Telghman. 1735. Mch. 25. " B. Tasker. 1735. May 26. " same. 1735. Aug. 2. " same. 1735. " " " Ogle. 1735. Dec. 15. " Tasker. 1735/6. Mch. 18. " same. 1728. June 19. Commission to Edward Henry Calvert as First Member of the Privy Council of Maryland. [Parchment.] 67 1729/30. Jan. Commission to Caecilius Calvert and Thomas Beake as Secretaries. 1729-1750. Copies of Orders and Instructions of Charles, Lord Baltimore. Small folio. 118 pages. Contents : 1729. Oct. 14. Caecilius Calvert's petition to the King on behalf of Charles, Lord Baltimore. 1729. Dec. 18. Report of Privy Council on above. 1729. ? Petition of J. Henderson and other clergy. 1729/30. Jan. 17. Memorial of Traders. 1729/30. " " Petition of J. Henderson. 1729/30. " 22. 1729/30. " 22. " of John Sharpe and other lawyers, and reply of Lord Baltimore. 1729/30. " 30. Dissent to Act of Assembly. " " " Instructions to Governor. " " " Additional Instructions to Governor. 1729/30. " " Instructions to Agent. " Mch. 9. Yorke's opinion on Acts. ? . Answer to Clergy Address. 1730. July 19. Instructions to Agent. 1730. Nov. 18. Petition of. Henderson. ? " " Traders. 1737. Aug.18. Order of Council. 1737. Oct. 12. Instructions to Ogle. 1737. " " " " Tasker. 1738. Mar. 28. Form for entering Tobacco free. 1738. May 4. Agreement between Baltimore and Penn. 1738. May 25. Order of King on above. 68 1730/1. May 30. Answer to Assembly. " 29. Instructions to Governor. " " Additional Instructions to Gov ernor. " " Letter to Clergy. " " " " Charles Calvert. " " Instructions to Agent. ? " " Governor. 1732. May 5. King's additional Instructions to Lord Baltimore. June 16. Commissioners of Trade to Ogle. 1732/3. Feb. 23. William Jansen to Commis sioners of Trade. 1734. Aug. 10. Additional instructions to Ogle. 1731. . ? Form of patent for appointment of new Governor. 1732/3 ? Form in French for admission of Palatines. ? Form of appointment for Privy Councillor. 1733. June 18. Orders to Surveyor General. " Agent. " Ogle. " June 14. Orders to Jennings. " " " " Agent. " " 15. Additional Orders to Agent. 1735. Mch 25. Orders to Tasker. May 26. " " same. " " Instructions to Jennings. " " " " Ogle. Aug. 2. a " same. a a a " Tasker. Dec. 14. a " Ogle. ii ii (( " Tasker. 1735/6. Mch. 18. a " same. 69 1736/7. Jan. 22. Opinion of Attorney General on nomination of Treasurer for Maryland. 1735. Dec. 14. Answer to Assembly. 1736/7. Jan. 10. " " 1733 ? Instructions to Receiver General. 1738. Dec. 15. it it a 1738/9. Feb. 22. 1740/1. Jan.? 1741. Aug. 12. Ogle. Jennings. Tasker. Ogle. same.Tasker. 1741. Dec. 23. Proclamation. 1742. May 12. Speech to Assembly. 1742. " " Proclamation. 1742. " 28. Orders to Bladen. 1742/3. Mch. 24. " " same. 1742/3. " " Proclamation. 1743. Aug. 9. Orders to Bladen. 1743. " " Answer to Upper House. 1743. " " " " Assembly. 1743. July 20. Proclamation. 1743. Aug. 10. Answer to Assembly. 1743. Dec. 2. Order to Bladen. 1743. " 23. Proclamation. 1743. " 23. Orders to Bladen. 1745. Aug. 7. " "same. 1746/7. Jan. 30. " " same. 1746/7. Mch. 20. Proclamation. 1746. Apl. 2. Orders. 1746. Apl. 4. Schedule of Deeds and Papers in Hyde Case sent to Maryland. 1746. July 6. Orders to Tasker. 1747/8. Feb. 24. " " Land Office. 1749/50. Feb. 6. " " Ogle. 70 1751-1753. Instructions in Letter Book of Frederick, Lord Baltimore. As under : 1752. May 10. Onslow and Sharpe, Guardians to Ogle. " " Same to Tasker. July 8. Same to same. " " Same to same. 1751. June30. Same to Ogle. 1753. Mch. 17. Frederick, Lord Baltimore, to Sharpe. " " " Same to same. 1753. Mch. Form of Commission for Domestic Chaplain. Separate Instructions of Frederick, Lord Balti more. 1754. Jan. 5. to Sharpe. " " Lloyd. " Apl. 17. " same. " " " Sharpe. " " " Upper House. " " " " Lower House. " Dec. 10. " Sharpe. " " " Lloyd. 1755. Sep. 9. " Sharpe. Oct 27. " same. ? " same. Rough draft. 1756. Mch. 9. " same. Dec. 16. " same. " " " Lloyd. 1757. Apl. 31. " Mr. Beadnall. Letter. 1758. Sep. 30. " Assembly. Nov. 27. " Sharpe. 1759. Mch. 17. " same. " 29. " William Perkins. Letter. 71 June 19. to Lords of Treasury. Letter. 1760. July 8. " Sharpe. Oct. 30. tt same. Dec. 20. n same. tt tt ii same. 1761. Aug. a same. Oct. 8. u same. H tt a same. tt tt CI same. 1762. June 16. tt same. 1765. Jan. 16. a same. 1765. tt tt a same. 1765. tt tt it same and Council. it tt tt a same. Rough draft. tt it it tt Sharpe. tt tt « tt same. tt it it tt aamo " Feb. 7. " same. " " 26. " same. ? ? ? about repositories for Archives. Two copies. Hints to be submitted to his Lordship's perusal and consideration only and in order to frame proper instructions to his Governor. 1751. Aug. 17. Appointment of Caecilius Calvert as Secretary for Maryland. 1751. Sept. 1. Appointment of Edmund Jennings as Deputy Secretary of Maryland. 1761. June 25. Bond of Daniel Dulany as Commissary General. 2. Council Records. 1638-1685. Extracts. Folio, 60 pages. 1677. Apl. 13, June 24. Sm. folio. 1677. June 24. Seating the seaboard. 1683/4. Mch. 12, 19. Planting Northern border. Fo., 4 pp. 72 1683/4. Mch. 22. 1684. Oct. 3. 1684. Nov. 5. 1685. May 30. 1685. June 1. 1685/6. Mch. 4. 1685. Apl. 10. 1715. Sep. 3. 1715-1716. Dec.-Feb. 1715. Apl. 23-25. 1716/7. Jan. 11. 1719. Sep. 10. 1736. Oct. 21. 1739. Aug. 1. 1753. Dec. 19. 1756. Nov. 13. Talbott's commission for taking Newcas tle and instructions about settling the country. Folio, 4 pages. Treaty with Indians. Folio, 4 pages. Sm. folio. 30 pages. Council Seal. " 12 pages. " 16 pages. " 17 pages. Cresap affair. Sm. fo. 7 pages. " 2 pages. " 26 pages. 3. Assembly Records. Upper House Journals. 1717. Apl. 22. 1719. May 14. 1720. Apl. 5. 1721. July 19. 1722. Oct 10. 1723. Sep. 23. 1725. Oct. 16. 1725/6. Mch. 15 1726. July 25. 1727. Oct. 10. 1729. July 19. 1731. May 24. 1732/3. Mch. 13. 152 pp. 129 pp. 128 pp. 100 pp. 59 pp. 167 pp. 131 pp. 35 pp. 52 pp. 30 pp. not paged, perfect. 79Pp. 71pp. 1733/4. Mch. 19. 1736. Apl. 10. 1736. Apl. 20. 1739. May 1. 1740. Apl. 23. 1740. July 7. 1742. Sep. 21. 1746. Mch. 29. 1746. July 8. 1746. Nov. 12. 1747. May 16. 1748. May 10. 1751. May 15. 10 pp. 71pp.49 pp. 71pP. 109 pp. not paged, perfect. 65 pp. 32 pp. 40 pp. ' 21pP. 65 pp. 69 pp. 53 pp. 73 1751.1752.1754. 1754.1754. 1754.1755.1755. 1756.1756. 1757.1757. 1758.1758. Dec. 7. June 3. Feb. 26. May 8. July 17. Dec. 12. Feb. 22. June23.Feb. 22. Sep. 14. Apl. 8. Sep. 28. Feb. 13. Mch. 28. 15 pp. 38 pp. 12 pp. 35 pp. 16 pp. 13 pp. 50 pp. 20 pp. 81pp. 45 pp. 43 pp. 69 pp. 17 pp. 129 pp. 1758. Oct. 23. 9 pp. 1758. Nov. 22. 31pp. 1759. Apl. 4. 12 pp. 1760. Mch.22. 36 pp. 1760. Sep. 26. 23 pp. 1761. Apl. 13. 34 pp. 1762. Mch.17. 131 pp. 1758. Proceedings of both houses on the Supply Bill, with short intro duction and opinion of the Atty. Genl. Large folio, pp. 32. Lower House Journals. 1716. Apl. 22. 1717. May 28. 1718. Apl. 22. 1719. May 14. 1720. Apl. 5. 1720. Oct. 11. 1721. July 18. 1721/2. Feb. 20. 1722. Oct 9. 1723. Sep. 1724. Oct 6. 1725. Oct. 6. 1725/6. Mch. 15, 10 14 pp. not paged, per fect. 116 pp. 162 pp. 89 pp. 61pp. 90 pp. not paged, per fect. not paged, per fect. 1-5 miss ing., 170 pp. 113 pp. 108 + 13* pp. not paged, per fect. pp. 1726. July 12. 1728. Oct. 3. 1729. July 10. 1747. Dec. 22. 1749. May 24. 1751. Dec. 7. 1752. June 3. 1754. Feb. 24. 1754. May 8. 1754. Dec. 12. 1755. June 23. 1756. Feb. 23. 1756. Sep. 14. 34 pp. 172 pp. 159 pp. 19 pp. 168 pp. 31pp. 62 pp. 64 pp. 66 pp. 34 pp. pp. 1-2, 95- 100 and all after p. 102 missing. all after p. 289 missing. all after p. 106 missing. 74 1757. Apl. 8. 140 pp. 1762. Aug.27. 207 pp. 197 1TC7 Q OQ OIK Ort/I mioom, 1757. Sep. 28 1758. Feb. 13. 1758. Mch. 20. 1758. Oct. 23. 1760. Mch.23. 1761. Apl. 13. 245 pp. 44 pp. all after p. 249 missing. 43 pp. 201 pp. 119 pp. 1739-1763. 204 missing. 30 Addresses from the Assembly to the Governor, Lord Proprie tary and the King. Votes and Proceedings of the Lower House at the sessions of 1752. June 3. two copies. 1753. Oct. 2. 1754. May 8. 1754. July 17. 1755. Feb. 22. 1757. Sep. 28. 1758. Mar. 28. 1760. Sep. 26. 1763. Oct 4. printed. 4. Laivs. 1638/9-1739. Acts relating to support of government. [Attested copy, 1729.] Contents : 1638/9. Mch. 19. Ordeining Certain Laws. 1641. Mch. 28. Granting one subsyde. 1642. July 30. Support of Government. 1671. Mch. 27. same and Lord Proprietary. 1692. May 10. Annual Revenue. 1699. Ascertaining Acts of theProvince. 1700. Apl. 4. Council, with order of Privy Council. — Laws. 1704. Sep. 5. Annual Revenue. 75 1716. July 17. Gage of Tobacco hhds. 1716. " " Disposition of Fines. 1732. Sep. 29. Annual Revenue. 1739. Council to King. 1650. Aug. 6. Act assented unto by Lord Proprietary. Brought from Maryland in the troublesome times. [Five sheets of parchment.] 1650-1684. Acts. Sm. folio, 10 pages. Contents : 1650. May. Purchasing Land from Indians. 1671. Mch. Support of Lord Proprietary. 1674. May. Gratitude to Charles, fifth Lord Baltimore. 1676. May. Continuing the payment of 2 shil lings per hhd. 1684. Apl. 26. Council's declaration concerning the 2 shillings per hhd. 1649-1692. Acts. Attested in 1759. Contents : 1649. Apl. Levying war. 1661. " Raising forces for defence. " " Repeal of Act for Customs. 1692. June 7. " " " confirming Laws. 1649. Apl. Levying war. 1661. " 17. Repeal of Act for Customs. " " " Support of Government. " " " Port Duties. 1664. Sept. 27 Acts. 1666. Apl. 10. 28 Acts. 1672. May 10. Annual Revenues. 1676. Mch. 15. 21 Acts. [First and sixth leaf missing.] 1686. Nov. 19. Acts. [Parchment book.] 1688. Nov. 10 Acts. 76 1706. Apl. Act for advancement of trade and Proceedings of the Commissioners, July 15, 1706-Sept. 2, 1707. 1715. Apl. Body of Laws. 200 pages, sm. folio. 1718. May 8. Settling bounds of several lots in Annapolis. 1744. Raising 4d. per hhd. of Tobacco for Arms. Two copies. 1747. May 16. Selling liquors and running horse races near Yearly Meeting of Quakers. 1754. Feb. 26. Titles and observations on Acts passed. 1754. July 24. Raising £6,000 for His Majesty's service. 175 ? Second part of Act granting supply of £40,000. 1762. Mch. Titles of Acts passed. 178 ? To procure loan and Sale of Escheat Land and the Confiscation of British property. Laws in force to 1727. Sm. fo. sh., 1727. 1732. July 11. Session Laws. 1732/3. Mch. 13. do. 1741. June 17 1 to I 1742. Sep.-OctJ do. on separate sheets. official, printed 1753. Oct. do. 1754. Feb. 26. do. 1763. Nov. 26. do. Address of Assembly to Gov. Sharpe, and his reply, Apl. 14-15, 1761. Death of George II. Broadside, two copies. Petition of Jonas Green, about Printing, 1763. Broadside. IV. Land Records, Grants, &c. 1633-1657. A note of all warrants for the Granting of Lands in Maryland. 6 pp., fo. 77 1634-1660. Grants of Land in Calvert, St. Mary's, Isle of Kent and Charles Counties. 113 pp., fo. 1639. Nov. 5. Grant to Walter Notley. [Parchment.] 1640/9. Feb. 12. Same to Abel Snow. do. 1658. July 30. Order of Cecilius, Lord Baltimore, to restore the estate of William Nugent, Standard Bearer of the Province, to his widow. [Parchment] 1665. Apl. 5. Grant to Jane Sewall. do. 1669. May 15. Sale of Eltonhead Manor, Calvert Co., to Charles Calvert. [Parchment.] Grant to George Thompson. do. After 1662. Extracts from the Land Records. Transcribed and attested Sep. 19, 1758. Contents : 1674. July 13. Grant to Raymond Stapleford. 1679. Dec. 24. Richard Meekin's Certificate. 1679. Sep. 4. William Bourne's do. 1683. Sep. 10. Grant to John Kemball. 1663. May 27. Same to Francis Armstrong. 1683. May 25. John Pollard's Certificate. 1670. Sep. 1. Grant to Stephen Garey. 1680. Apl. 19. Walter Jones' Certificate. 1668. May 29. Three Grants to Thomas Taylor. 1679. Sep. 17. Thomas Smithson, assignment of Land on Miles River to M. Morrison of London. [Parchment.] 1681. July 1. Conveyance of St. Mary's Hill, St. Mary's Co., from William Boreman to Philip Calvert. [Parchment.] 1684. Oct. 11. Purchase of Land by Charles, Lord Baltimore, from Thomas Smithson of Talbot Co. [Parchment.] 1699. Oct. 16. Lease from Richard Bennett to Edward Somerset [Parchment] 78 1699. Oct. 21. Lease from Edward Somerset and Charles, Lord Baltimore, to Richard Bennett and James Heath. Lands in Maryland. [Parchment.] 1701. Oct. 10. Grant to Charles Carroll of Land in Anne Arundel Co. [Parchment.] 1721. Suit against Thomas Clark. Land in Prince George's Co. 1721. Oct. 29. Deposition of E. Griffith. Land in Cecil Co. 1722. Apl. 24. Certificate of Survey of Partner's Adventure. 1722. Apl. 27, 29. Writs by Gov. Keith for apprehending Philip Syng. 1722. May 28. Examination before Governor and Council in Philadelphia. Questions Athea P. Syng as to land in Maryland surveyed by him. 1722. June 18. Gov. Keith's warrant to lay out land on Susque hanna. 1722. July 20. Bounds of manors in Cecil Co. 1722. July 24. Same. ? Petition of Inhabitants of New Munster, Cecil Co. Bounds. 1729. Deed from Henry Darnall to John Hyde. Land in Prince George's Co. 1731. Jan. 28. Patent of Land to Thomas Cresap [parchment], and various depositions relating thereto on paper. 1739. Petition of Charles Carroll. Land in Anne Arundel Co. 1744. Same of Minister of Shrewsbury Parish, Kent Co. Confirmation of Grant. 1745. Feb. 18. Six documents relating to a tract of land in Prince George's County, in which Charles Lord Baltimore, Samuel, John and Herbert Hyde and others are interested. [Parchments.] 79 1754. Petition and other papers of Bennett Chew. Land at Turkey Point. 17 ? Petition of Inhabitants of New Munster, Cecil Co. Confirmation of their Grant. r Affidavit of Moses Faudrie. Land case. 1759. Sep. 28. Copy of Farmer's Bond for collecting Quit Rents. Forms of four warrants. Forms of Patent for Land as issued in Pennsyl vania and Maryland. Same. Virginia and New York. 1622. Feb. 20. Grant from the King of an annuity of £121 13s. 4d. to Sir George Calvert for eighty years, if George Calvert, Esq., his son, shall so long live. [Parchment, with Great Seal.] 1627. Apl. 20. Grant from Charles I of a subsidy on Silk to George, Lord Baltimore. [Parchment] Court Records, Wills, &c. 1632. Apl. 14. Will of George Calvert, Lord Baltimore. [Parchment.] 1632/3. Feb. 1. Inventory of goods and chattells of George Cal vert, Lord Baltimore. [Parchment.] 1635. Nov. 25. Grant by the Prerogative Court of Canterbury to Caecilius, Lord Baltimore, of administration on the estate of his brother, Henry Calvert, who died abroad or at sea and unmarried. [Parchment.] 1658. Divers proceedings in the Provincial Court. 8 168 ? Forms for the Provincial Court 34 pages folio. 1691. Nov. 26. Mrs. Jane Calvert's Deed of Trust for payment of debts. 80 1694. July 10. Post-Nuptial Settlement by the Hon. Edward Somerset on Anne, his wife, and daughter of Charles, Lord Baltimore. Signed by Somerset and Baltimore. [Parchment.] 1698. Two Copies of last paragraph of will of James Murphy. 1734. Case under the Act of 1704. Support of Gov ernment. 1718. Chancery Proceedings. Macnemara case. 1719. Case of Officers' Fees. 1721. Oct. 10. Provincial Court, Anne Arundel Co. 1725. Apl. 13. Mrs. Jane Hyde's Jointure. [Parchment.] 1728/9. Provincial Court. Nelson vs. Beale. 1732. Apl. 22. Will of Benedict Leonard Calvert. [Parchment.] 1736. Feb. 8. Duke of Beauford to Charles, Lord Baltimore and Caecilius Calvert, security for an annuity of £200, during life of Mrs. Brerewood. [Parchment, unexecuted.] 1738. Aug. 5. Release from Mrs. Margaret Calvert to Charles, Lord Baltimore, of £1000 and of his annuity to her of £100. [Two copies on parchment and rough draft on paper.] ? Case of Charles, Lord Baltimore, vs. Sir Abraham Janfsen (Baronet) for recovery of Lady Balti more's portion of Mr. Theodore Janfsen 's estate. Two copies. 1739. Provincial Court. Daniel Dulany, Atty. Gen eral, vs. Charles Carroll. Land case. 1739. June 9. Case under the will of Hon. Benedict Leonard Calvert. 1740. Sept. 19. Will of William Leman. [Parchment] 1745. Oct. 31. Declaration of trust of New South Sea stock held under the will of William Leman. [Parchment] 81 1753. Statement as to ordinary Licenses in Maryland. 1754. Nov. 16. Opinion on the Law of 1720. 1754. Statement of the 2s. per hhd. duty to the Lord Proprietary. 41 pages, large folio. Same, another copy. 65 pages, folio. 1754. Mch. 27. Release from Cecilius Calvert and Thomas Bladen of sums due Frederick, Lord Baltimore, sisters. 1755. May 6. Case Maryland Duty on Convicts. 1756. Remarks on the Act made Feb. 23. Two copies. 1757. May 24. Memorial of John Stewart to Lord Baltimore. Transportation of felons. 1757. June 25. Act for his Majesty's Service of 1754. Henley's opinion. 5 pp., fo. ? Case on two Maryland Acts. Testimony of convicted persons. Punishment of negroes. 3 pp., fo. 1757/8. Remarks on the bill for support of the Lord Pro prietary. 6 pages, others missing ; two copies. 1760. Oct. 13. Lord Proprietary vs. David Ross. Debt. 1770. May 4. Marriage Articles of John Hyde and Hon. Jane Calvert [Parchment.] 1739-1759. Burton vs. Calvert. Land in Wiltshire. 44 papers. 1748. Earl of Shelburne. Land in Wiltshire. 20 papers. 1748. Sept. 26. Will of Robert Eden. [Parchment.] VI. Account Books and Related Papers. Land office accounts for 1735, 1736, 1748, 1751, 1752, 1754, 1755, 1756, 1757, 1760, 1761. 11 volumes, small folio. Maurice Birchfield's account of Fees. 1714-1722. List of Bills Receivable. 1751-2-3. Account of the Commissioners of the Paper Currency. 1739. Account of Paper Currency issued since January, 1749. 11 82 Comrs. of Paper Currency to Lord Baltimore. Aug. 16, 1746. Same to Trustees of Paper Currency. " " " The usual way of raising money in Maryland for Defence. 1744. Observations on the Defence bill. 1744. Naval officers' accounts. 16 papers. 1753-1761. Accounts of Quit Rents. 40 papers. 1753-1762. Seconds of thirty-nine bills of Exchange. 1767. Part of an account book of Benedict Leonard Calvert. 1727. 52 pp. Rent Rolls with the earliest and latest dates of the Land Grants in the different counties. Talbot, 1658-1722, and Queen Anne, 1640-1724. Calvert, 1651-1723, and Prince George's, 1650-1723. Somerset, 1663-1723, and Dorchester, 1659-1723. Kent, 1658-1724, and Cecil, 1658-1724. Anne Arundel, 1651-1718, and Baltimore, 1658-1723. 5 volumes, thick small folio. Rent Rolls of Baltimore, 1700. Talbot, 1707. Calvert, 1707. Somerset, 1707. St. Mary's, 1707. Charles, 1753. Anne Arundel, 1707. Calvert, 1753. Cecil, 1707. Anne Arundel, 1755. Dorchester, 1707. Calvert, 1759. Kent, 1707. Charles, 1762.14 volumes, sm. folio. Debt Books of Prince George's, 1750. Baltimore, 1750. Charles, 1750. Anne Arundel, 1750. 4 volumes, sm. folio. Accounts of the Lords Baltimore's Revenues for 1731, 1733, 1748, 1752, 1753, 1754, 1755, 1756, 1757, 1758, 1759, 1760, 1761. 13 volumes, small folio. Lord Baltimore's Receipt book. 1729-1750. Account of dividends on Lord Baltimore's stocks. 1757-1760. 83 Accounts of Henry Hooper, agent. 1773-1774. Schedule of the Estate of Frederick, Lord Baltimore. Proven May 27, 1783. Folio, 87 pages. VII. Indians. 1677. May 22. Henry Coursey to Thomas Notley. Delaware Indians. 1677. July 20. Propositions made to the Onoudagas at Albany by Col. H. Coursey and their answer. 1677. July 21. Propositions made to the Maquas, and Sinnecoes, and others, and their answers. 1734. Dec. 12. Maquas Indian Letter to the King. Certified copy with Seal of Albany. 1744. June 12. Edmund Jennings to Lord Baltimore in reference to treaty with the Six Nations. 1744. June 30. Treaty with the Six Nations. Potomac and Sus quehanna Lands. Three copies. 1744. July 8. Edmund Jennings to Lord Baltimore in reference to the treaty. Two copies. VIII. Virginia. 1623. Oct. 8. Privy Council. Virginia affairs. 1634. July 22. King and Council to Gov. and Council, order to give Capt. W. Button Land on Appomattox. 1634. Oct. 8. His Majesty's Letter to Richard Bennett, Gov. of Virginia, in behalf of Mr. Clobery, concern ing the He of Kent. 1651. Mch. 12. Articles of agreement upon the surrender of Vir ginia to the Parliament. 84 1 652. Jan. 27. Council of State to Richard Bennett in Virginia, about Lord Baltimore. 1662. Mch. 23. Virginia Law concerning Indians. 1667. Oct. 30. Order of Privy Council. Cessation of Tobacco planting. 1686. Apl. 29. Trial of George Talbot for a murder committed in Maryland. Attested copy, Mch. 16, 1 702/3, with Virginia Court Seal. 1686. " " Same. Attested copy of 23 Jan. 1724, with Great Seal of Virginia. IX. Letters. 1621. Oct. 21. John Mason to George Calvert. Salt making. 1633. Apl. 23. Caecilius, Lord Baltimore, to the Constable of Windsor Castle, tendering two Indian arrow heads, his first year's rent for Maryland. 1633-1765. Receipts from the Constable of Windsor Castle for the rent of Maryland. The years represented are 1633, 1634, 1636, 1638, 1640-1643, 1655-1658, 1660- 1663, 1671-1677, 1736, 1738-1740, 1743- 1751, 1765. Thomas Smith's relation of his voyage when he was taken by the Marylanders. 5. Henry Ewbank's relation of his being taken prisoner at Mattapany. Thomas Copley to Lord Baltimore. Thomas Cornwaleys to same. . Richard Kempe to same. Leonard Calvert to same. John Lewger to same. 1635. Apl. ? 1635. Apl. 5. 1638. Apl. 3, 1638. ii 16. 1638. ii 25. 1638. a 25. 1638/9. Jan. 5. 85 1638/9. Jan. 5. Richard Kempe to same. 1638/9. Feb. 4. Same to same. 1638/9. " 20. Thomas [Andrew] White to same. 1642. Nov. 21-23. Lord Baltimore to Leonard Calvert. 1664. Apl. 27. Charles Calvert to Lord Baltimore. 1672. " 24-26. Same to same. 1673. June 2. Same to same. 1674. July 24. Same to Lord High Treasurer. 1679-1680. Part of a Letter Book of Charles Calvert, Gov ernor, mostly on family affairs. Folio, 16 pp. Contents : 1679. July 9. to ? " " 10. to Mrs. Mary Darnall. " " to Elizabeth Calvert. " " to Richard Allibone. " " " to Nicholas Lowe. " 13. to same. " 15. to Mrs. Byard. " " " to Nicholas Lowe. " " 14. to Dirck Burk. " " " to Dunck. " " to Gilbert. " Nov. 24. to Dunck. " Dec. 30. to same. 1679/80. Feb. 13. to same. " " 26. to same. Philemon Lloyd 1719. July 18. to ? Land Laws. 1722. " 19. to ? Copper Mines. " " 28. to Copartners. Land office and Franklin. " 30. to ? Boundary. " Oct. 8. to Copartners. Same and Copper Mines. ? ? to ? Land office. [Fragment.] 86 1729. Oct. 26. Benedict Leonard Calvert to Charles, Lord Baltimore. 1731/2. Jan. 10. Governor Ogle to same. 1733. Aug. 28. Same to same. 1749/50. Feb. 12. Same to same. " Charles, Lord Baltimore, to Benedict Calvert, Lloyd, Sharpe and others. Rough drafts. Governor Thomas Bladen 1743/4. Jan. 22. to Lord Baltimore. 1743/4. Feb. 3. to same. 1743/4. " 18. to same. 1744. June 27. to same. 1744. Nov. 15. to same. Edmund Jennings 1744. June 12. to Lord Baltimore. " July 8. to same. " Aug. 23. to same. " 28. to same. " Nov. 17. to John Browning. " " " to Lord Baltimore. " Dec. 3. to same. 1746. Nov. Benedict Calvert to Lord Baltimore. 1765. June 24. Same to same. Stamp Act. Daniel Dulany ? to Governor? 1743/4. Feb. 22. to Lord Baltimore. 1744. June 11. to same. " 14. to John Browning, " July 16. to Lord Baltimore. " " to ? " Nov. 24. to Lord Baltimore. 87 1764. Sept. 10. to ? Criticism of Sharpe. ? to Lord Baltimore. Pages 9-10 only. ? ? Benjamin Tasker 1743/4. Feb. 20. to Lord Baltimore. 1744. June 4. to same. " " to same. " " to John Browning. " 16. to Lord Baltimore. July 12. to same. Sept. 17. to same. to same. to John Browning. to Lord Baltimore. to same. to John Browning. " to Lord Baltimore. 18. to John Browning. 1744/5. Mch. 15. to Lord Baltimore. 1755. Sept. 29. to John Browning ? 1760. Sept. 12. to Caecilius Calvert. ? '? to ? Entry of Letters on several occasions from the Rt. Hon. Frederick, the Lord Proprietor of Maryland and Avalon. Also From the Hon. Caecilius Calvert, his Lordship's uncle, and Secre tary for the affairs of the Province, and Orders and Instructions, &c, being dispatches to the Governor and the several officers and others in Maryland. Begun September the 17th, 1751, pp. 199. Small fo. Vellum. 1751. Sept. 17. Lord Baltimore to Ogle. 1751. Dec. 20. John Sharpe to same. Oct. 20 Nov. 20 a it a 22 Dec. 3 88 1751. Dec. 20. John Sharpe to Jennings. 1751. " 24. C. Calvert to Ogle. 1751. " " Same to Jennings. 1751. " " Same to Tasker. 1752. May 15. C. Calvert to Ogle. 1752. " " Same to Jennings. 1752. " " Same to Tasker. 1752. " " Same to John Ross. 1752. June 12. John Sharpe to F. J. Paris. 1752. July 8. Onslow and Sharpe to Tasker. 1752. " 9. C. Calvert to same. 1752. " " Same to same. 1752. " " Same to same. 1752. " " Same to same. 1752. " " Same to Jennings. 1752. " " ; Same to Darnall. 1752. " " Same to Young. 1752. " " Same to Steuart. 1752. " " Same to Benedict Calvert. 1752. " •' Same to Edward Lloyd. 1752. " " Same to David Graham. 1752. " " Same to John Ross. 1752. " 29. Guardians' petition to King about Boundary. 1752. Aug. 22. C. Calvert to Tasker. 1752. '¦ " Same to Jennings. 1752. Sept 14. Same to Rev. Thos. Bacon. 1752. July 28. Lord Baltimore to same. 1752. Sept. 14. C. Calvert to Tasker. 1752. " " Same to Jennings. 1752. " 25. Same to Dulany. 1752. " 30. Same to Tasker. 1752. Dec. 11. Same to same. 1752. Nov. 17. Report of Board of Trade on Petition of Guardians. Boundary. 89 1749/50. Feb. 28. Extract from Report of same. Account of expenses Canada expedition. 1752. Dec. 11. C. Calvert to Jennings. 1752. " " Same to Darnall. 1752. " " Same to Geo. Stuart. 1752. " " Same to Benedict Calvert. 1752. " " Same to Edward Lloyd. 1753. Feb. 16. Same to Tasker. 1753. " " Same to Darnall. 1753. Mch. 7. Lord Baltimore to the King. Appointment of Horatio Sharpe as Governor. 1753. Mch. 17. Lord Baltimore. Speech to Assembly. ? Frederick, Lord Baltimore, to ? Prejudice of Marylanders against him. 1756. Dec. 21. Same to Sharpe. Revenue of Province. 1765. Feb. 7. Same to same. Ordinary Licenses. Caecilius Calvert, Secretary, ? to ? about Henderson. 1754. Jan. 5. to Rev. Thomas Bacon. " " " to Sharpe. " Dec. 10. to Lloyd. " to Sharpe. 1755. Jan. 12. to Sharpe. Two copies. " Dec. 23. to same. 1756. Mch. 9. to Lloyd. " to Sharpe. 1758. Nov. 27. to Tasker. Enclosure, John Hyde to Hugh Hammersley, Sept. 14, 1758. 1758. Nov. 27. to Sharpe. Imperfect. 1759. Sept. 20. to Dulany. " Nov. 12. to Dr. Nichols. 12 90 1759. 1760. 1760. 1760.1761. 1762, Nov. 17. to Hunt. " 18. to Young. " to Tasker. Two. " " to G. Steuart " " to Benedict Calvert. Apl. 5. to Tasker. Nov. 2. to same. Dec. 2. to Sharpe. 20. to same. Imperfect. Mch. 17. to same. Oct. 8. to Rev. Thomas Bacon. Imperfect. " to Sharpe. June 29. to Lord Baltimore. Aug. 30. to same. 4( Sept. 28. to same. (( Oct. 5. to same. it " 15. to same. a '• 28. to same. n Nov. 12. to same. a Dec. 24. to same. 1763. Jan. 18. to same. (( Aug. 21. to same. Mason and Dixon start. tt Nov. 18. to same. Rents. 1764. Jan. 10. to same. Rough draft. tt tt (« to same. Full copy with additions. a " 30. to same. ? to same. Imperfect. 1764. Mch. 28. to same. Imperfect. (( a a to same. it June 1. to same. ii July 2. to same. 1765. Jan. 16-: Feb. 9. to Sharpe. Two. a Feb. 26. to I same. <» Feb. 26. to Lloyd. 91 1765. May 21. to Sharpe. ? ? to Mr. Sharpe (John?). Governor Horatio Sharpe 1753. Sept. 14. to C. Calvert (extract). 1754. Nov. 5. to ? 1755. Oct. 22. to Lord Baltimore. 1756. Mch. 8. to C. Calvert. 1757. Dec. 26. to same. ? ? Memoranda by Sharpe, Lloyd and others. Two copies. 1758. July 9. to Lord Baltimore. 1759. July 13. to C. Calvert. 1760. Apl. 14. to Secretary Pitt. May 23. to Lord Baltimore. " 26. to C. Calvert. July 7. to same. Oct. 12. to same. Dec. 20. to Lord Baltimore. " 22. to C. Calvert. 1761. Apl. 19. to same. May 5. to same. * 5. to TjotA Bal»»BK*ft. Oct. 22. to same. " to C. Calvert. Not. \i. to Latxl Baltimore. " 13. to C. Calvert 1762. May 11. to same. June 21. to same. Sept. 12. to same. " 25. to same. Two copies. Oct. 11. to same. Nov. 3. to same. 1763. Apl. 26. to same. 1764. Aug. 22. to same. Imperfect. / 92 1765. July 10. to C. Calvert. 1767. Mch. 11. to Lord Baltimore. June 15. to same. 1755. Oct. 3. Richard Lloyd to B. Tasker. 1756. May 9. John Sharpe to Lord Baltimore. 1756. June 19. William Sharpe to ? 1757. May 25. D. Wolsleaholme and J. Ridout to Gov. Sharpe. 1758. July 28. Benj. Young to C. Calvert. 1758. Nov. 3. David Ross to Gov. Sharpe. 1762. Sept. 16. Thomas Cresap to C. Calvert. Hugh Hammersley 1760. June 28. to C. Calvert. 1762. June 23. to Lord Baltimore. 1763. Feb. 15. to same. " 25. to same. 1764. Sept. 11. to same. ? to same. ? to same. Ben net Allen 1765. May 3. to Lord Baltimore > 1767. Jan. to same. Feb. to same. Imperfect. June 21. to same, Aug. 27. to same. Sept. 3. to same. ? to same. A Poem. ? to same. A Postscript, 1762. June 12. Capel Hanbury to ? 1764. Mch. 26. C. and O. Hanbury to ? 1764. Aug. 13. J. Ridout to ? 93 1765. Aug. 25. J. M. Jordan to Lord Baltimore. ? ? Same to same. Imperfect. B. BOUNDARY DISPUTES; DELAWARE AND PENNSYLVANIA. X. Lands on the Delaware Peninsula. 1629-1674. Translations, Notes and Extracts taken from the Dutch Records of New York. 1753. Mr. Jacob Goelet, Interpreter. By Lewis Evans. Relating to Grants on Delaware and various Maryland affairs, attested before Gov. Delancey by Goelet and Evans. Sm. 4o., half calf, pp. 176. [Great Seal of New York attached.] 1641. Mch. 12. Copy of exemplification of grant by Charles H to Duke of York. 4 pp., fo. 1660. Apl. 8. Grant by Charles II to Duke of York of town of Newcastle. 23 pp., fo. 1664-1675. . Inspeximus of New York Records ; Boundaries of neighboring colonies ; Nicholls' Commission ; Duke of York's Grant ; and other documents relating to settlements on Delaware. July 29, 1740. [Great Seal of New York. Parchment] 1664. Apl. 2-26. Same. -Duke of York's grant ; Commission of Nicholls. Oct. 17, 1735. [Great Seal of New York. Parchment.] Same. Another copy. Oct. 20, 1735. 1664. June 24. Copy of part of Deed from Duke of York to Lord Berkeley and Sir George Carteret. No. 2. 2 pp., fo. 94 1664. July 22-Oct. 1. Inspeximus of New York Records ; Letter from Gov. Winthrop of Conn, to Gov. Nicholls, and other documents relating to Dutch on Delaware. Oct. 20, 1735. [Parchment] 1668. June 16. Exemplification of a grant on west side Delaware Bay to Isaac Holme and others. Aug. 18, 1735. [Parchment.] 1671. May 1. Confirmation of grant from Col. Lovelace to v Simeon Brent. Land on west side Delaware Bay. 3 pp., fo. Same. 2 pp., fo. 1671-73. Extracts from the Registry Books kept by James Weedon and Francis Jenkins, surveyors of land on the seaside and Delaware Bay. 22 pp., fo. 1671-73. Grants of Land on or near Delaware. Copy made about 1750. Sm. fo. Contents : 1671. July 15. Daniel Brown. On Seaboard. 1671. " " John Collison. same. 1670/1. Jan. 30. John Rhodeson. same. 1674/5. Mch. 22. Lord Proprietor. Manor in Somerset. 1671/2. Feb. 4. Randall Revell. Indian Neck. 1673/4. Mch. 17. Lord Proprietor. Manor of Somerset. 1671/2. Feb. 10. Robert Catlin. Near Indian Neck. 1671/2. " 13. same same. 1671/2. Feb. William Thompson. Island Creek — Rehoboth Bay. 1672. May 21. John White. Montmore. 1672. " 8. Andrew Gundry. Gundry's De- light. 1672. " 10. Charles Prouse. Prouse's Re covery. 95 1672-1686. 1672. May 10. George Sealy. Sealy's Delight. 1672. " " John Boteler. Newington Green. 1672. " 11. William Coulter. Cheive Chase. 1672.. " " Mathew Wilson. Nottingham. 1672. " " William Winsmore. Pipe Elm. 1672. " 14. William Prentice. Prentice's 2d Choice. 1672. " 22. Daniel Browne. Charing Cross, 1672. " 17. Richard Patee. Seiuse. 1672. " 15. Richard Kemball. Partner's Choice. 1672. " 12. Henry Smith. Kodder. 1672. " 16. same. Porshows. 1673. Aug. 1. Robert Ridgely. Friend's Choice. Extracts or Copys of Severall Grants or Pattents of Land recorded in the Land Record Books of the Province of Maryland. Exhibitt No. 4. 9 pp., fo. Contents : 1672. Nov. 10. Liber W. C. No. 2, fo. 176. 1682. 1672. 1682.1684. 17. same. No. 5, fo. 336. Nov. 17. Apl. 5. same. same. No. 5, fo. 335. No. 4, fo. 139. 1686. May 10. 1675. Sept. 23. Payment made to Indians for Land on west side Delaware. 1 p., fo. 1682-8. Grants of Land on or near Delaware. Copy made about 1750. pp., fo. Contents : 1683. June 28. Col. Vincent Lowe. Talbot Co. Col. Talbot. New Ireland, Cecil Co. 1682. June 12. John Stevens. Durham Co. 96 1684. Apl. 5. John Stevens. Durham Co. 1684. " 25. Ephraim Hermann. St. Augus- .tine Manor. " " same. same. 1687. Sept. 20. Richard Pattey. Somerset Co. 1688. June 12. same. . same. 1688. July 22. Robert Ridgely. On Delaware. 1683. Nov. 29. Edward Dwyro. New Ireland, Cecil Co. 1683. May 10. same. same. 1683. Aug. 29. same. New Munster, .Cecil Co. 1683. May 10. . same. same. 1.683. Sept. 29. same. . New Ireland, Cecil Co. 1686. May 10. Thomas Casey. same. Col. Talbot. Cowe Creek, Cecil Co. same. Izembergh, same. 1682. Aug. 20. Copy Duke of York's grant to William Penn of Newcastle and twelve miles around. Fo., two copies. 1682. Aug. 24. Exemplification of Duke of York's grant of New castle, the twelve mile circle and land south of Newcastle to William Penn. From the New York Records, Oct. 17, 1735. . [Great Seal of New York. Parchment.] Same. Another copy made Oct. 20, 1735. 1683. Talbot's Commission and Demands, etc. 7 pp., fo. Contents : 1683. Sept. 17. Talbot's commission from Lord Baltimore to demand all land on west side Delaware below 40° from William Penn. 97 1683. Sept. 24. Talbot's Demand of N. Moore. " Oct. 31. An answer to a demand made to N. Moore, Penn's .Deputy. Con siderations upon the answer. 1683. Copies of warrants for land on Delaware Bay. 1685. Nov. 1. Order in Council. Division of the Peninsula. 1685. Nov. 13. Order of Privy Council dividing the Peninsula. 1716. May 16. Attainder of Col. Robert Talbot, of Hexham. Order to seize his Real and Personal Estate in Cecil and Talbot Counties. Attested Copy, Sept. 27, 1759. 1717. Oct. 21. Petition of Earl of Sutherland to King for grant of the Three Lower Counties. 6 pp., fo. same. 10 pp., fo. 1725. Jan. 6. Appointment of meeting. Earl of Sutherland's petition. 1753. Oct. 20. Lewis Evans to Gov. Sharpe, with a Summary of the Dutch Records of New York, with a map showing distribution of Land under agreement of 1732. 12 pp., 4o. 1756. Apl. 16. Report of Board of Trade on petition of Caleb Evans praying a grant of all Islands in Dela ware River and Bay. XI. Extracts from Records in England and America. Extracts from Council Records. Large folio, pp. 5-28, 33-44. Contents : 1659. Oct. 7. Liber H. H., pages 44-59. 1661. May 13. same. 97-99. 1661. " 21. same. 108. 1661. July 1. same. . 110-112. 1661. Sept. 19. same. U7-119. 13 98 1669. Oct. 22. B. pages 16-17. 1670. Sept. 19. C. B. 35-36. 1671. Dec. 6. 1672. C. B. 110-113. 1683. Mch. 12. R. R. 59, 63. 1683. " 22. same. 72,76. 1684. Aug. 7. same. 118-119. 1684. Oct. 4. same. 123. 1684. Nov. 5. same. 144. 1685. May 30. same. 230-231. 1685. June 1. same. 235-236. 1685/6. Mch. 5. same. Extracts from Council Records. Sm. fo., pp. 62. Copy made about 1726. Contents : 1659. Aug. 3, Oct. 6-9. Liber H. H, pages 42-59. 1661. May 21, July 1. same. 97, 108, 110, 113. 1669. July 8, Oct 22. K. K. 3, 4, 6, 7, 14, 15. 1673. Oct. 1. R. R., parti. 20. 1677. June 24. same. 122. 1683/4. Mch. 12, 19. R. R., part 2, 59, 63, 72, 73, 75. 1684. Apl. 5. same. 79. 1684. May 12. C. B., No. 1. 86, 88. 1684. Oct. 3, Nov. 5. R. R. part 2. 115-118, 121- 123, 142-144. 1685. May 30, June 1. same. 203,225,232,235, 236. 1685/6. Mch. 5. same. 314, 317. 1650. May. Act Purchasing Lands from Indians, W. H, 116-117. Hermann's Patent, C.B., No. 1 , 59-65. 1670. Dec. 23, 24. C. B. pages 40. 1672. June 19, 20. same. 110, 106. 99 1672. July 11, 12. C. B. pages 113, 115. 1672. Dec. 16, 18. same. 118, 119. Copies of papers from the Plantation office. About Penn's Grant. Transcribed in 1735. Sm. fo., pp. 28. Contents : 1680. June 14. Council to Mr. John Werden. Werden to Council. 1680. June 23. " to Blaithwayt. 1680. " " Barnaby Dunck and Richard Burk to Wer den. 1680. Oct. 16. Werden to Blaithwayt. 1680. Nov. 6. Council to Attorney General. 1680. Nov. 18. Blaithwayt to Lord Baltimore's Agent. 1680. " 20. Werden to Blaithwayt. 1680. " 20. same to same. 1680. Dec. 16. Council Summons to Lord Baltimore's agent. ? Penn's Boundary settled by Lord Chamber lain. ? Attorney General to Lords of Trade. 1681. Feb. 24. Report of Mr. Penn's patent. Proceedings before Committee of Trade. 1683, Apl. 17, 27 ; May 30 ; June 12. 1683/4, Feb. 12 ; July 2 ; July 16, 23 ; Sept. 30 ; Dec. 9. 1684/5, Mch. 17 ; Aug. 18, 26 ; Sept. 2 ; Oct. 8, 30 ; Nov. 7. Privy Council. 1680, June 14, 25 ; Nov. 1 ; Nov. 11 ; Dec. 16. 1680/1, Jan. 15, 22; Feb. 24. 1682. Aug. 1. Copy Duke of York's Grant of Pennsylvania to Penn. 1633. July 3. Privy Council on Remonstrance of Virginia against Lord Baltimore's patent. 1638. Apl. 4. Privy Council on Claiborne's petition. 100 XII. Penn vs. Lord Baltimore. Subsections: 1. Court Proceedings. 2. Agreements. 3. Appointment of Commissioners. 4. Commissioners' Eeports. 5. Surveyors' Reports. 6. Maps. 7. Letters. 8. Miscellaneous. 1. Court Proceedings. 1743. June 9. Defendant's interrogatories to prove copy of Order on Claiborne's claim in 1638, with the nature and authority of the book in which that order is entered, also a copy of the order of Council in 1696. 3 pp., fo. 1743. June 9. Before Lord Chancellor about Orders of Apl. 4, 1638, and July 7, 1696. 1 p., fo. 1743. July 15. Agreement of Solicitors to enlarge time for taking testimony. 1 p., fo. Two copies. 1743. July 19. Order of Master of the Rolls to enlarge time of publication. 4 pp., fo. 1743. Oct. 26. Notes taken on a former hearing in 1743. 3 pp., fo. Three copies. 1747. May 14. Penn's Bill. 66 pp., fo. 1747. Nov. 7. Answers of Charles, Lord Baltimore, to the Bill. Revivor and Supplemental Bill of Penn's. 4pp.,fo. 1747. ? List of Evidence for Plaintiff. 12 pp., fo. 1747. ? Proofs for Defendant. Pp. 83-110. 1747. ? Abstract of Exhibits for Defendant. Nos. 1, 2, . 3, 4, 6, 7, 7, 9. 14 pp., fo. 1747. ? Depositions on Plaintiff's part. Pp. 44-110. same. Four imperfect copies. 101 1740. Oct. 20. Attested copy of Deed from William Penn to William Standly for five thousand acres in Pennsylvania. May 4, 1682. No. 3. 4 pp., fo. 1742. June 17. Publication to be further enlarged for a month. 1 p., fo. 1742. July 13. same, for three weeks. lp.,fo. 1742. ? Affidavits of F. J. Paris about postponements. 1742. ? Defendant's instructions. 10 pp., fo. 1743. June 6, Affidavit of F. J. Paris to be added to above. 2 pp., fo. Three copies. 1743. ? State of the case between Baltimore and Penn as found among his Lordship's papers. 4 pp., fo. Six copies. 1743. ? Notes of the Argument made use of by the Lord Chancellor on the former hearing in 1743, with a copy of Gov. Ogle's letter of Dec. 1, 1750. 3 pp., fo. 1743. June 2. Affidavits of John Sharpe and Hugh Hammersley about finding the order of April 4, 1638, on Clai borne's Petition. 9 pp., fo. ? Defendant's interrogatories to prove copy of order made on Claiborne's claim in 1638. 10 pp., fo. 1743. June 3. Affidavit of W. Rowlandson as to the delivery of Notice of Motion. 1 p., fo. 1743. June 9. Breviate of additional depositions taken under the order of 9 June, 1743, with a copy of the Articles. No. 4. 14 pp., fo. Six copies. 1699. Petition of Charles, Lord Baltimore, to the Queen against Order of 7 Nov., 1685. No. 4. 4pp.,fo. 1699. Same. With letter from the King to Lord Bal timore reciting grant made to Penn, and, 1681. 2 mo. 10th. Letter from William Penn to Lord Baltimore. 1699. ? Petition of William Penn to the Queen, offers to carry out former instructions of 1683-4-5, with Letters of 102 1677. Aug. 24. William Popple to William Penn. 1678. Aug. 20. Nicholson to Lords of Trade. 1697. June 10. [Title of] Address of Council of Maryland to ? 1697. Sept. 1. William Penn to Markham. 1697. Sept. 2. Lords of Trade to Nicholson. 1699. Sept. 20. same to Blackiston. 1735. June 21. Brief, Bill and Answer for Defendant [Baltimore]. 43 pp., fo. Six copies. 1735. ? Case of the Defendant 15 pp., fo. Three copies. same, with memoranda. Two copies. 1735. Oct. 9. Brief on part of Plaintiffs [Penns]. 7 pp., fo. same. 3 pp., fo. ? Petition of Charles, Lord Baltimore, to the King. 2 pp., fo. 1735. ? Memoranda of Evidence read for the Plaintiff. 3 pp., fo. Five copies. 1748. Feb. 21. Defendant's instructions to oppose notice of motion. 8 pp., fo. 1749. Depositions on Plaintiffs. 45 pp., fo. 1749. Jan. 10. Notice to Defendant of an examination of wit nesses. 1 p., fo. Two copies. 1749. Feb. 26. Petition of Lord Baltimore to Lord Chancellor to hear cause, with Lord Chancellor's order. 1 p., fo. 1749. Instructions to move on petition of Feb. 26. 2 pp., fo. Three copies. 1750. ? Additional Brief of Penn. 4 pp., fo. 1750. . State of the amendments made by Plaintiffs to their Bill since argument of Defendant's plea. No. 8. 15 pp., fo. Two copies. 1750. May 7. Further evidence of Plaintiffs. 3 pp., fo. 1750. May 15. Notes of Lord Chancellor on pronouncing his decree. No. 13. 7 pp., fo. Three copies. 1750. May 30. Breviate Supplemental Bill and Answer and 103 Proceedings subsequent thereto. No. 3. 11 pp., fo. Three copies. 1750/1. Mch. 16. Petition of Penn on the Decree. 5 pp., fo. Two copies. 1750/1. Mch. 19. Affidavit of F. J. Paris about Commission un der the Decree. 17 pp., fo. 1751. Mch. 27. Petition of Solicitor of Baltimore on same. 2 pp., fo. 1751. Mch. 29. Order of Lord Chancellor. Circle round New castle. 26 pp., fo. 1751. Mch. 29. same. same. 1 p., fo. 1751. Apl. Petition of Penn to the King. 3 pp., fo. 1752. Petition of Lord Baltimore, to oblige Penn to join in ascertaining the Boundary. No. 5. 3 pp., fo. 1752. Mch. 22. Affidavits of John Browning and Hugh Ham mersley. 4 pp., fo. Three copies. 1752. June 30. Penn. Petition about Commissioners. 3 pp., fo. 1752. Nov. Brief on two Petitions (one of Baltimore, the other of Penn) to the King. For the Defen dant in support of their petition. 22 pp., fo. Four copies. 1753. Petition of Penn to have the line run under the Decree. 3 pp., fo. 1753. Mch. 22. Instructions to oppose petition of Penn. 14 pp., fo. Two copies. 1753. May 1. Instructions for a conference with the Speaker. 1 p., fo. 1753. May 4. Instructions to attend a Conference at the Speak er's on the two petitions. 1 p., fo. Two copies. 1753. June 21. Further instructions in the affair of Penn and Baltimore. For the petitioner Baltimore. 6 pp., fo. Two copies. 1753. Nov. 28. Petition of Penn to the King to have line run under the Decree ; recites agreement of 1732 104 and Decree of 1750 ; asks for Commissioners to define Boundary. 6 pp., fo. same. 3 pp., fo. 1754. Mch. 25. Case of Frederick, Lord Baltimore. 9 pp., fo. 1754. Jan. 21. Petition of Frederick, Lord Baltimore, to House of Commons on his claims. Sm. fo., printed. 1754. Nov. 8. Penn's Bill. 637 pp., fo. same. 48 pp., fo. 1755, Mch. 17. Notice to attend Conference at Mr. Henley's, 1 p., fo. 1755. May 7. Plea on behalf of Lord Baltimore. 45 pp., fo. Two copies. 1755. July 21. Instructions to move amendments to original bill. 2 pp., fo. 1756. Aug. 14. F. J. Paris's paper on East and West line and Lord Baltimore's answer. 1 p., fo. 1757. ? Short hints as drawn up by Lord Baltimore's Solicitor for better consideration of the instru ment of confirmation prepared and tendered by the Solicitor of the Penns. 8 pp., fo. Three copies. 1759. May 29. Heads of matters agreed upon between Counsel on both sides. 1 p., fo. 1760. ? Penn's Bill. 219 pp., fo. 1761. Brief for Defendant. 21 pp., fo. Two copies. 1761. July 23. Attorney General's and Solicitor General's opinion on the Agreement. 11 pp., fo. 1762. ? Answer of Lord Baltimore to Bill of Com plaint of Penns. Indenture of 1760. 2 pp., fo. 1762. Feb. 2. Brief for Defendant. 21 pp., fo. Three copies. 1768. Aug. 20. Report of Attorney General and Solicitor General on Petitions of Lord Baltimore and Messrs. Penn. 105 After 1760. Copy Bill in Chancery as prepared by the Attor ney of the Penns and approved and signed by the Solicitor General, intended to be filed. 3 pp., fo. After 1730. Lord Baltimore's case, with opinion of Mr. Wil- braham and Mr. Jodrell. 4 pp., fo. ? Petition of the Penns to the King with answers thereto. 12 pp., fo. Two copies. ? Copy of Mr. Browne's notes for his intended argument. 19 pp., fo. Two copies. 1736/7. Lancaster Co., Pa. Trials of Disturbers of the Peace. 7 pp., fo. 2. Agreements. 1732. May 10. Articles of Agreement, with copy of MSS. map annexed. 6 pp., fo. same. without map. 6 pp., fo. same. same. 3 pp., fo. 1733. Printed Title page of and the Penn Map to Agree ment of 1732. Sm. fo. 1732. ? Observations for Lord Baltimore on the Agree ment as now adjusted and on Mr. Wilmot's proposed alteration thereon. 5 pp., fo. 1750. Mch. 16. Depositions in regard to the Agreement of 1732. 15 pp., fo. 1750. May 15. Lord Chancellor's decree on Articles of 1732. 2 pp., fo. 1750. same. 11 pp., fo. 1750. Draft of Indenture. 28 pp., fo. 1750. June 26. Penn's Solicitors' proposed alterations. 2 pp., fo. 1756. Draft of Indenture. 26 pp., fo. 1756-7. Draft of Indenture as originally prepared by the Penns, with the several alterations proposed 14 106 therein by Lord Baltimore's Counsel. No. 1. 27 pp., fo. same. 28 pp., fo. 1757. Aug. 8. Draft of Agreement, with Penn's Solicitors' amendments to and alterations, and Letter of F. J. Paris. 3 pp., fo. 1757. Aug. 8. Same, with some short answers thereto. Nos. 2-3. 5 pp., fo. 1759. May 28. Heads for a conference between Attorney General and Solicitor General for final settlement of intended agreement. 2 pp., fo. 1759. May 29. Heads of matters agreed upon between Coun sel. 1 p. 1760. June. Draft of Agreement. 33 pp., fo. 1760. Observations on the Draft prepared by the Penns. 1760. July 4. Agreement. 21 pp., fo. same, with map in margin. Two copies. [Parchment.] 1760. July 5. Penn's release to Lord Baltimore of past costs and damages. [Parchment.] 1761. July 23. Attorney General's and Solicitor General's opinion on the Agreement. 1 page, fo. 1762. Aug. 2. Petition to confirm Agreement. 36 pp., fo. 1768. Aug. 20. Report of Attorney General on the various Agree ments and Indentures. 2 pp., fo. 3. Appointment of Commissioners. Lord Baltimore's. 1750. June 28. Draft of Commission. 5 pp., fo. 1750. June 20. Alterations on above proposed by Penns. 3pp.,fo. 1750. June 28. Commission, full copy. [Parchment] 1760. July 5. Same. Map in margin. Two copies, do. 1761. Apl. 30. Commission enlarging time. Two copies, do. 107 1763. July 4. First draft of request to Governor to assist Mason and Dixon, with loose memoranda. 3 pp., fo. Same, with memoranda incorporated. 3 pp., fo. 1763. Aug. 4. same. [Parchment] 1763. Feb. 9. Commission enlarging time. Draft. 5 pp., fo. 1763. Feb. 15. same. Draft. same. [Parchment.] 1764. June 2. same. Draft altered to Nov., 1765. 1765. Dec. 14. same. [Parchment.] 1766. Nov. 1. same. do. 1767. Nov. 2. same. Draft. same. [Parchment.] 1750. June 30. Draft of Commission. 5 pp., fo. 1763. Feb. 15. Commission to enlarge time. [Parchment.] 1763. July 4. Request to Governor to assist Mason and Dixon. Draft. 3 pp., fo. 1764. Aug. 4. same. [Parchment.] 1764. June 2. Commission enlarging time. do. 1765. Nov. 28. Same. Part missing. do. 1766. Nov. 1. Same. do. 1767. Nov. 2. Same. do. 1763. Aug. 4. Baltimore and the Penns' Agreement with Mason and Dixon. Close copy. 4 pp., fo. Same with colored wood-cut, 1732. Map in mar gin. [Parchment.] 4. Commissioners' Reports. 1732-1733. Copys of several papers exchanged and delivered between the Commissioners appointed for exe cuting the Articles of Agreement between the Proprietarys of Maryland and Pennsylvania. No. 8. 24 pp., large fo. Another copy called "A State of the Commission ers' Proceedings." 80 pp., folio. 108 1750. State of the Commissioners' Proceedings under the decree of 1750. 12 pp., fo. 1750. Nov. 15-24. Proceedings of the Joint Commissioners. At tested copy. 23 pp., sm. fo. 1751. Apl. 22-June 17. Same. 9 pp., fo. 1751. Apl. 22-29. Same. Attested copy. 20 pp., fo. 1760. Sept. 19-Nov. 18. Same. Maryland Commissioners. i2pp., sm. fo, 1760. Nov. 19-Dec. 11. Same. Joint do 16 pp., fo. 1760. Dec. 11-18. Same. Maryland do 2 pp., fo. 1761. Mch. 25-June 25. Same. Joint. 10 pp., fo. 1761-1762. Oct. 19-Apl. 30. Same. 7 pp., fo. 1762. Apl. 29-30. Same. 4 pp., fo. 1762. Sept. 14-15. Same. 4 pp., fo. Two copies. 1762. " " Two Propositions of the Maryland Commis sioners. 1763. July 15-21. Proceedings of Joint Commissioners. 17pp.,fo. 1763. Oct. 20-Dec. 10. same. 8 pp., fo. 5. Surveyor's Reports. 1751. Apl. 26-June 15. Emory and Jones' Journal. 20 pp., fo. 1752. Apl. 16-June 15. same. 9 pp., fo. 1760. Dec. 12-18. Copy of Instructions and Journal. 8 pp., fo. Two copies. 1760-1762. Journal, No. 1, Dec. 13-June 15, with diagrams. 88 pp., sm. fo. 1762-1763. Same, No. 2, July 31-Aug. 30. 56 pp., sm. fo. 1762. May 24-June 15. Journal. 4 pp., " " July 31-Aug. 16. same. 4 pp., " " Aug. 17-Sept 1. " Sept. 2-9. " Sept. 18-Oct. 23. " Oct. 25. " Oct. 6-25. 1763. Mch. 30. same. 4 pp., a same. 3 pp., " same. 4 pp., a same. lp., it same. 3 pp., tt same. lp.,two copies, 109 1764. Dec. 4. Mason and Dixon to ? 4 pp. 1768. Jan. 29. same to H. Hammersley. 3 pp. 1768. Penns and Baltimore in account with Mason and Dixon. 1769. Feb. 24. Same with Receipt in full of Lord Baltimore's moiety. 6. Maps. 1732. Map of Proposed Boundary. Printed by B. Franklin, and usually found with the printed Articles of Agreement of 1732. Wood-cut Two copies. Same. Colored. Same. Copper-plate. Same. MS. on parchment. 1749. Lewis Evans' Printed Map of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York and Three Delaware Coun ties. L. Hebert, Sculp. Same. Colored. 1751. Emory and Kitten's MS. Map of Taylor's and James' Island, Dorchester Co., Md., June 15, 1751. ? MS. Parchment Map of the Circle around New castle, showing property touched by the tan gent. 1768. Engraved Map of the final award of the Joint Commissioners with their report on parchment. Two copies. 7. Letters. 1681. Apl. 10. William Penn to Lord Baltimore. " Sept. 16. Same to Frisby, Lloyd and others. 1682. June 5. Charles, Lord Baltimore, to Capt. Wm. Mark- ham. 110 1682/3. Mch. 12. William Penn to Lord Baltimore. 1683. May 30. Same to same. 1683. June 6, Same to same. 1713. June 9. Charles, Lord Baltimore, to Deputies of Pa. 1722. July 14, Philemon Lloyd to Lord Baltimore. 1722. Sept. 11. Same to same. 1732. Aug. 18. Same to same. 1732. ? Same to same. Pp. 9-15. 1732/3. Feb. 17. P. Gordon to same. 1725. Mch. 22. Charles Lowe to P. Lloyd. 1749/50. Jan. 31. P. Gregory to Lord Baltimore. 1750. July 27. Same to same. " Aug. 4. Same to same. 1750/1. Feb. 23. John Sharpe to Edmund Jennings. 1752. May 28. Same to F. J. Paris. 1752. Sept. 14. Edmund Jennings to C. Calvert. 1753. May 5. C. Calvert to Thomas Penn. 1753. Aug. 18. Same to John Sharpe. 1755. Apl. 27. E. Jennings to C. Calvert. 1756. May 3. John Penn to Lord Baltimore. 1756. June 19. William Sharpe to ? 1760. Nov. 29. Stephen Bordley to C. Calvert. 1760. Dec. Gov. Sharpe to Charles Goldsborough. ? Queries submitted to C. Goldsborough and his answers. Two copies. 1760. Same to D. Dulany. 1760. Gov. Sharpe to S. Bordley. Two copies. Additional Queries submitted to S. Bordley. Two copies. 1761. Feb. 24. S. Bordley to H. Sharpe. ? Same. Answer to Queries. 1761. Apl. 22. Charles Wilmot to C. Calvert. 1761. June 19. C. Calvert to Hugh Hammersley. 1763. Sept. 25. Same to Lord Baltimore. Ill 8. Miscellaneous. 1680. Mch. 4. The Charter of Pennsylvania. 2 pp., sm. fo. Copy made early in 18th century. 168 ? Col. Talbot's Conference with William Penn. 10 pp., fo. 1682. Dec. 13. Conference between Lord Baltimore and William Penn at Col. Tailler's on the Ridge in Anne Arundel Co. 7 pp., fo. . 1683. May 31. The sum and substance of what was agreed and spoken by Charles, Lord Baltimore, and Wil liam Penn at that private conference at New castle. 3 pp., fo. Same. Attested by Lord Baltimore. 2 pp., fo. The state of the Lower Counties in relation to Penn. 2 pp., fo. 1715. The Claims of the Proprietors of Maryland and Pennsylvania stated. 16 pp., fo. 1720. Aug. 29. [Logan's] A plain view of all that has been said or publickly talked for these twenty years last past concerning the boundaries of Maryland and Pennsylvania. 3 pp., fo. Sundry observations relating to Lord Baltimore's claims. 4 pp., fo. 1722. Jan. 19. Proclamation of Governor reciting order of Privy Council, Nov. 13, 1685. 1736. Oct. 21. Resolution of Governor and Council on Cresap affair. 1737. Apl. 20. Depositions about burning Cresap's house, and of Cresap's house being in Maryland. 35 pp., fo. ? MS. Map of headwaters of the Potomac and ad jacent country, showing Indian towns. Two copies, one with memoranda. A letter from a gentleman in Pennsylvania to his friend in Mary land, with some reasons why the Northern Boundary of 112 Maryland is limited to 39 degrees, together with an answer to the foregoing letter. Mch. 27, 1749, May 1, 1749, Apl. 12, 1751, with five MS. Maps on three sheets, and a wood-cut of Smith's Map of 1606 ; engraved by J. Senex, 1735. 43 pp., sm. fo. Same. Three other copies without maps. Each 17 pp., large fo. Some short observations upon the Penselvanian Map and ground less objections against the undoubted rights and bounds of Maryland. 9 pp., fo. Gov. Ogle's observations on the demands of the Penns. 4 pp., large fo. Five copies. 175 ? An account of the question in dispute between Baltimore and Penn, with a draught (map) of Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and New Jersey. 1751. Apl. 12. Agreement between Lord Baltimore and Abra ham Taylor in reference to evidence to be fur nished. [Parchment.] The Case of the Province of Maryland, touching the outrageous riots which have been committed in the Borders of that Province by inhabitants of Pennsylvania. To be heard before the Lords of the Council, 23d Feb., 1737. 3 pp., fo. Remarks on a Message of the Upper House to the Lower House of Assembly in 1762. [Philadelphia: B. Franklin,] 1764. pp., sm. 8o. [In a contemporary letter of D. Dulany, this pamphlet is said to have been written and printed by Franklin.] Justice of taxing the American Colonies demonstrated. London, 1766. 8o. Treaty of 1794. London, 1795. 8o. Case of the British Merchants trading to America. London, 1804. 8o. Extracts from Long's Astronomy to shew that a parallel of Lati tude is a due East and West line. 21 pp., fo. 113 1763. Aug. 4. Dr. Bevis' and Mr. Harris' Hints on running the Tangent Line. Signed by Cecilius Calvert, John Penn, and Rich ard Penn. Opinion of Robt. Henley on the Tangent Line. Reasons by Lord Baltimore's Mathematician for a superficial measure. 2 pp., fo. ~_ Proposals of Mr. Caecilius Calvert on the tangent. C. AVALON. XIII. 1623. James I. Patent to Sir Geo. Calvert, of Avalon. Copy in English. 11 pp., fo. Same. Copy in Latin. 9 pp., fo. 1634. Inspeximus of the charter of Avalon. [Great Seal. Parchment.] 1638. Nov. 13. Charles I. Patent of New Foundland to Hamil ton Pembroke Holland and Dr. David Kirke. 10 pp., fo. 1651/2. Mch. 11. Deposition of James Pratt. Avalon Patent. 2 pp. 1652. Examination of Annie Love and others before Commissioners at Ferry land. Avalon Patent. 45 pp., fo. 1652. May 5. Petition and Remonstrance of Sir David Kirke about Avalon. May 5. Two papers. 1652. Aug. 30. Answers of Amy Taylor to her examination. Avalon Patent. 1652. ? Deposition of John Stevens. Avalon Patent. 1653. The Lord Baltimore's case concerning Avalon. 1663. Aug. 30. Act made by the tenants of Avalon. Fishing, etc. 15 114 1670. Lord Baltimore's case concerning Avalon. The same. [Printed broadside.] 1674. June 1. Commission to Robt. Swanly as Lieutenant of Avalon. [Parchment.] 1677. Mch. 30. Order of Privy Council Building in Newfoundland. 1677. Apl. 11. George Pearson to Lord Baltimore advising him of above order. 1677 ? State of the business of Newfoundland and the fisheries. 11 pp. 1753. Lord Baltimore's petition relating to appointment of a Governor for Avalon. 6 pp., fo. Three copies. 1753. July 26. Privy Council order referring above to Commis sioners of trade. 1754. Copy, case of Lord Baltimore relating to Avalon, with Earl of Northumberland's opinion, with report of Attorney-General made upon his Lordship's petition for leave to appoint a Governor. Enclosure. Duplicate of Petition of 1753. Bounds of the Province. 1756. Petition of Worthington Brice for working mines in Newfoundland. ? Fred., Lord Baltimore's petition to King relating to the Province of Avalon. 7 pp., fo. 115 D. THE CALVERT FAMILY. XIV. Grants, Deeds and other Documents relating to Land, etc., in England. Parchment. The Arundels. 14 Elizabeth, Trinity Terra. Fine and surrender by Wil liam Lord Burghley and others, to Matthew and Charles Arundell, of Man or of Semley. 40 Elizabeth, 21 July. Covenant by Sir Matthew Arun del, and signed by him. ? 14 Elizabeth, 25 June. Wm. Cecil, Lord Burghley, to Matthew Arundel, to Anthony, Viscount Mountague. 1582. 24 Elizabeth, 25 Oct Sir Matthew Arundel to WilUam Arundell. Land at Tilbury, Wiltshire. Signed by Matt. Arundel. 27 Elizabeth, 19 June. Sir Matthew Arundell, of Ward- our. Land in Dorset. 28 Elizabeth, 23 Oct. Deed from Sir Mathewe Arun dell, of Wardour Castell, to Anthony Vycount Mountague, K. G., and others. Land in Dorset. Signed by Mountague and others. 1598. 41 Elizabeth, 14 Dec. Will of Sir Matthew Arundel, Knight. Signed Matt. Arun dell. 45 Elizabeth, 1 Dec. Sir Thomas Arundel, grant of Christ Church Manor. Signed 116 45 Elizabeth, 24 Jan. 1 James, 20 Oct. 13 James I, 13 Nov. 14 James I, 12 Dec. 15 James, 10 May. 1633. 9 Charles, 1 June. 1636. 12 Charles, 30 Apl. 1637. 13 Charles, 2 July. 1637/8. 13 Charles, 28 Feb. by Tho. Arundell, witnessed by Thomas Arrundell, of Wardo Castell, and others. John Bodenham to and from Sir Thomas Arundel, surrender and lease of Manor of Semley. Thomas Arundel, of Wardour, to John Barnes. Signed by John Barnes. John ffoyle, for Lord Arundel. Signed by John ffoyle. Decree in Chancery. Earle vs. Earle. Certified by Great Seal. Christ Church Manor. Same to Garrett Weston and William Hocher. Signed by Thos. Arundell. Same to Edward, Lord Gorges, of Dondalke, and others, Manor of Semley. Signed Thos. Arun dell. Same. Appointmenttouses War- dor Castle and other property. Same to J. Reynell and William Sandys. Land in Dorset. Signed by Reynell and Sandys. Articles, Agreement betweane the Lord of Shrewsbury and My Lord Arundell as to the intended marriage of the Earl to Frances, daughter of said Thomas. Signed Shrewsbury. (Cancelled). Witnessed by Lord Baltimore. 117 1628. 12 Oct. 1639. 15 Charles, 1639. 15 Charles, 20 June. 1639. 15 Charles, 16 Aug. 1639. 15 Charles, 1 Oct. 1639. 15 Charles, 3 Oct. 1639. 15 Charles, 16 Oct. 1639. 15 Charles, 25 Oct. 1639. 15 Charles, 6 Nov. 1641. lMch. 1641. 1653/4. 19 July. 20 Feb. True Copie of the declaration sealed by My Lord, Thomas Arundell. Signed by Tho. Arundell. Rt. Hon. Thomas, Lord Arun del, of Warder, to Cecill, Lord Baltimore. Thomas, Lord Arundell, to Ce cilius, Lord Tisbury- Wilts. Signed by Tho. Arundell Bal timore. Same to Caecill, Lord Baltimore. Manor of Semly. Signed C. Baltimore. Same to same. Same property. Signed Tho. Arundell. Covenant between same. Same property. Signed Tho. Arun dell. Counterpart of Grant from same to same. Same property. Indenture between same. Tilbury and Semley. Signed Tho. Arundell. Myles Phillipson and others, to Cecill, Lord Baltimore. Cecill, Lord Baltimore, and Wm. Catchmayd, Fishmonger. To supply salmon caught. (Un executed). Thomas, Lord Arundell, of War- dour. Relating to the probate of his will. Cecil, Lord Baltimore, to Thomas Hooper. Land in Dorset. 118 1655. 1 Mch. Agreement between Cecill, Lord Baltimore, and Humphry Weld, of Lulworth, and Clare, his wife, and Catherine Ewre, widow, two of the daughters and co-heirs of Ladie Anne Arundell. 31 Henry VIII, Jan. 30. Grant by Henry VIII of a licence to Cristofer Conyers, son and heir of Robert Conyers. 5 Elizabeth, June 28. To George Conyers. [Great Seal.] 26 Elizabeth, Feb. 13. Lease to Thomas Conyers, son of George Conyers, by Hon. William Cecil Knight, Lord Burghley, and Thomas Sex- aforde. With Schedule at tached. Signed by W. Burgh ley. 40 Elizabeth, Nov. 3. Lease, from Hurvey Hastinges to Thomas Lyne, of Wyke Farm, in Co. Southampton. Case of Outlawry of Charles Calvert in Ireland in 1689. 17 ? Broadside. Two copies. 1720. May 4. Marriage Articles of John Hyde, Esq., and the Hon. Jane Calvert. Signed Charles Baltemore. Witnessed, Ben.. Leo. Calvert. ? 1751. Case upon the three Maryland Acts, and Opinion. Two copies. 1751. Two papers. Case on Marriage Settlement of Frederick, Lord Baltimore. 1751-4. A paper relating to the portions of Caroline and Louisa Calvert. 1751. June 11. Appointment of Cecilius Calvert and Thomas Bladen as guardians of Caroline Calvert. 119 1751. Nov. 23. Frederick, Lord Baltimore vs. Onslow and others. Three papers. ? Seven papers in the Francis Brerewood case. ? Executors of Charles, Lord Baltimore, vs. Fred erick, Lord Baltimore. Defendant's Answer. 26 pp., fo. 1753. Nov. 12. Richard Barnet to Jno. Morgan. Amount of debt due by Frederick, Lord Baltimore, and Release to Lord Baltimore endorsed thereon. Danby Wishe. 1601. 42 Elizabeth, Mch. 5. Grant of the advowson of the rectory of Danby. Signed by Richard Etheryngton and Henricus Best. 1603. 1 James I, Oct. 20. Thomas Conyers, Christopher Conyers and George Pudsley and William Moynell. Grant to Grover Pudsey and others. Signed by Thomas and Chris topher Conyers. 1608. 6 James I, Dec. 5. Robert Dawe and Robert Typ- per. Danby Wiske and various Manors in Suffolk, Norfolk, &c. Signed by Robert Dawe. 1611. 9 James I, Aug. 7. Radulphus Rookeby to Marma- duke Sympson. Signed by Ru. Rokeby, Roger Tockett, William Tockett and Myles Taylor. 1612/3. 9 James I, Mch. 21. Raphe Rookebye and others to John Constable. Signed by Raphe Rookebye and Myles Taylor. 120 1615/6. 13 James I, Feb. 13. George Calvert . and Richard Forster. Signed by Ri : Fors- ter. 1617. 14 James, June 19. George Calvert, Esq., to James Morley and James Pennyman, Jr. Signed by James Morley. 1622. 20 James, Dec. 6. Sir George Calvert, Knight, to Walter Mallory, Danby Wiske — and on separate sheet of parchment, North East Shore in Moulton. Signed by Geo. Calvert. 1623. 20 James, Dec. 6. Same. Signed by Walter Mal lory. 1623. 20 James I, Dec, 7. A Declaration of Trust. Sir George Calvert, Knight, Sir Henry ffane, William Peaseley and Philip Darnall. Signed by Geo. Calvert. Two sheets. 1694/5. Feb. 18. Charles, Lord Baltimore, and Thomas More. Signed by T. . More. Kiplin or Kipling. 39 Elizabeth, June 15. Bargain and Sale of the tytles of Kipling from Henry Scroope and Cuthbert Pepper. Signed by Henry Scroope. 21 James, Feb. 18. Sir George Calvert, in chancery, with part of the Seal. 1677. 29 Charles II, Aug. 5. Charles, Lord Baltimore, Chris topher Smithson and Leonard Smithson to George Smithson and others. Signed by Ch. 121 Baltimore, Christopher and Leonard Smithson. 1677. 29 Charles II, Aug. 6. George Smithson, Nicholas Lowe and Charles, Lord Baltimore. Declaration of Trust. Signed by George Smithson and Nich olas Lowe. 3 Charles, Mch. 20. Sir George Calvert to Cecil Cal vert, to levy a fine on all his lands in Yorkshire. Signed Geo. Baltimore. Same. Signed Cecill Calvert. 1678. Mch. 15. Charles, Lord Baltimore, to Henry Lowe and others. Kip- lin, Danby, &c. Signed C. Baltemore. Moulton. 16 James I, Nov. 28. The King to Sir George Calvert. (Calvert family grs. of land in Eng.) 1643. 19 Charles, Aug. 11. Cecill, Lord Baltimore, Hugh Smithson, Jerom Roystone, Jr. and Peter Coles. Signed C. Baltemore. Counterpart of same. Signed by Smithson, Roystone and Coles. 1648. 24 Charles, Dec. 1. Hugh Smithson, Jerom Royston, Jr., Peter Coles, William Bur nett and James Clement. Signed by first three. Tested, C. Baltemore. 24 Charles, Dec. 2. William Burnett, James Clem ent and Cecill, Lord Baltemore. 16 122 With a schedule of various deeds. Signed C. Baltemore. 1676. 29 Charles II, Mch. 8. James Clement, Charles, Lord Baltemore, and Richard Alle- bond. Grant. Signed by Jas. Clement and Ch: Baltemore. " " " 9. Release. Signed by same. 31 Charles II, Mch. 14. Charles, Lord Baltimore, Henry Lowe, Nicholas Lowe and Thomas Gilbert. Signed C. Baltemore. Semley. 9 Elizabeth, July 20. Henry Baynton, Francis Bayn- ton and Roger Bodenham. 1608. Dec. 5. Edward Thurlande to John Manyngham. Signed by Manyngham. 1655. Aug. 16. Rowland Piatt and William Kuype to Cecill, Lord Balti more. Signed by Piatt and Kuype. ? Lands in Berks, Wilts and Ox ford. 1616. May 13. Pitzhanger, Middlesex. Rich ard Lee. Conveyance in fee of the Manor of Pitzhanger. Signed by Richard Lee. Same. Signed by same. East Pulham. 1571. Dec. 12. An exemplification of dismission of evidence. Carle vs. Arundel. Three sheets. 123 1653. Feb. 20. Conveyance from Sir Thomas Reynell and others, trustees, to William Constantine and Raphe Darnall of East Pulham and Berne Meadow, held in trust under the will of Thomas, Lord Arundel, for his grandson, Henry Arundel. Signed by J. Reynell and witnessed by C. Bal temore, John Langford and others. 1658. July 7. Nicholas Gould, Cecill, Lord Baltimore, William Constantine, Raphe Darnall, Robert Haworth and Richard Whitehead. Signed by Gould, Haworth and Whitehead. Same. Signed by Haworth and Whitehead. Same. Omitting name of First. Signed by same. 32 Charles II. Wragg's Recovery. ? 1 James II. Same. ? Waterford, Ireland. 1709. June 21. Conveyance by Charles, Lord Baltimore, and others, of lands in County Waterford to James Taylor. Signed C. Baltemore and Fran.Wyse. St. Giles in the Fields. 1697. Oct. 15. Charles, Lord Baltimore, to William Spencely Brownlow Street With schedule. Signed by Spencely. 1734. Mch. 31. Counterpart of assignment of lease from Lord Baltimore to Raphe Lane. Signed by Ra. Lane. 1731. July 8. Manor of Chesterton, Huntingdon. 1732. Oct 12. William Genew, of Ham. Co., Surrey, to Caecilius Calvert, Esq. Counterpart of Mortgage. 1745/6. Feb. 17. Power of Attorney from John and Henry Hyde to Thomas Bladen, Benjamin Tasker and D. Dulany. 1745/6. Feb. 18. Same from Samuel Hyde to same. 124 1745/6. Feb. 18. Same from Charles, Lord Baltimore to Thomas Bladen and Benjamin Tasker. Epson. 1709-1766. Eighteen parchments and papers. Eden Papers. 1748. Sept. 26. Tested copy of Will of Robert Eden, Hon. Spen cer Cowper, Duke of Durham, to Sir John Eden, Baronet. 1762. July 3. Same to same. 1764. Jan. 9. Same to same. License to assign. Two copies. " " 11. Sir John Eden, Baronet, to Robert Eden. XV. Personal Letters. 1731. Sept. 6. Henry Jernegen to Lord Baltimore. 1740/1. Feb. 6. John Dacosto to ? 1741. Oct. 3. C. Calvert to John Sharpe. 1744. June 1. Two receipts. Theo. Janssen. 1753. Dec. 14. Lord Baltimore to Lady Baltimore. 1756. Mch. 6. Duke of Devonshire to Lord Baltimore. 1756. Mch. 23. Duke of Bridgewater to same. 1756. May 8. Earl of Waldegrave to same. 1756. May 9. Earl of Hertford to same. 1756. May 9. Earl of Northumberland to same. 1756. June 6. Same to same. 1756. June 6. Earl of Waldegrave to same. 1756. June 8. Earl of Jersey to same. 1758. Aug. 20. Duke of Bridgewater to same. 1758. Aug. 24. Earl of Jersey to same. 125 1758. Aug. 24. Duke of Bedford to same. 1758. Aug. 25. Earl of Essex to same. 1758. Sept. 1. Lord Gower to same. ? Same to same. 1759. Apl. 11. C. Pratt to same. 1765. Apl. 7. Stapleton to same. ? Earl of Halifax to same. Lord Baltimore to ? Same to Lady Diana Egerton. 1756. May 13. Same to Lady Baltimore. Lady Di. Egerton to Lord Baltimore. Same to same. Lady Baltimore to same. Same to same. Same to same. Mr. Wroughton to same. Mr. and Mrs. Grenville to same. Louisa Calvert to Lady Baltimore. 1763. Feb. 12. Frederic Juboch & Co. to Lord Baltimore. In French. " Apl. 13. Baron de Fries to same. In French. " Apl. 18. E. Wieman to same. In German. " May 17. Baron de Fries to same. In French. " July 15. Same to same. In French. " Nov. 7. Hammond Habbach to Sir John Eden. " Dec. 9. John Bowlby to R. Eden. 1764. Apl. 20. Meynard to Lord Baltimore. " July 1. Lord Baltimore to ? In Italian. French letter to Lord Baltimore. An account against same. In Italian. Six memoranda and bills relating to same. Memoranda about Northwest Passage. 30 pp. " concerning travelling. 151 pp. Colored plan of Battle of Dettengen, 1743. 126 Map of part of Russia, 1734. Colored MS. plan of Cronstadt and St. Petersburg, 1737. XVI. Heraldic Documents. 1622. Dec. 3. Confirmation of Arms to Sir George Calvert. Granted by Richard St. George Norroy, King at Arms. [Emblazoned.] Signed Ri : St. George Norroy. 1624. Patent under the Great Seal creating George Cal vert, Baron Baltimore of Baltimore in Ireland. [Emblazoned with Great Seal.] 1656. Pedigree of the families of Jarmy Mynn and Wyndham, prepared for Mr. Justice Wyndham. [With numerous Coats of Arms tricked and emblazoned.] 1785. Apl. 6.' Confirmation of Arms to Lady Frances, Mary Wyndham (daughter of Frederick, last Lord Baltimore). Signed Isaac Heard, Garter prin cipal King at Arms, and Thomas Lock, Claren- ceux King at Arms. [Emblazoned. Seals.] 1746. Feb. 3. Patent appointing Charles Fifth Lord Baltimore Cofferer of the Household to H. R. H. Fred erick, Prince of Wales. [Seal.] 1746. Feb. 3. Another as Surveyor General to H. R. H. Fred erick, Prince of Wales. [Seal.] THE CALVERT PAPERS ? FIRST SELECTION. CONTENTS. No. Paoe. 1. Lord Baltimore's Instructions to Colonists, 131 2. Thomas Smith's Account op his Capture, - 141 3. Henry Ewbank's Account of his Capture, - 145 4. Secretary Kemp to Lord Baltimore, - 149 5. The same to the same, - 152 6. The same to the same, 155 7. Thomas Copley to the same, - - 157 8. Thomas Cornwai.eys to the same, - 169 9. Gov. Leonard Calvert to the samk, - - - 182 10. Secretary John Lewger to the same, 194 11. Father Andrew White to the same, 201 12. Cecilius, Lord Baltimore, to Gov. Leonard Calvert, 211 13. The same, Declaration to the Lords, 221 14. Gov. Charles Calvert to Cecilius, Lord Baltimore, 229 15. The same to the same, - 252 16. The same to the same, - 277 17. Part of a Letter-Book of Gov. Charles Calvert, - 305 18. William Penn to Charles, Lord Baltimore, - 322 19. The same to Frisby, Jones, and others, 323 20. The same to Charles, Lord Baltimore, - 325 21. The same to the same, - - - 327 22. The same to the same, - - - 328 23. Charles, Lord Baltimore, to William Markham, - - 330 17 129 THE CALVERT PAPERS. No. 1. LORD BALTIMORE'S INSTRUCTIONS TO COLONISTS. [Indorsement.] 15 Nouem. 1633. A Coppy of Instructions to Mf Leo. Caluert, Mf Jerom Hawley & Mf Tho. Cornwaleys the Lo : Baltimores Gouernor & Comissioners of his prouince of Maryland. In the 5* Article some directions is given con cerning Cap. Cleyborne. Instructions 13 Nouem : 1633 directed by the Right HoIlO,'!', Ceciliiis Lo : Baltimore & Lord of the Prouinces of Mary Land and Avalon vnto his well beloued Brother Leo : Caluert Esqf his Lop? Deputy Gouernor of his prouince of Mary Land and vnto Jerom Hawley and Thomas Cornwaleys Esq? his LopF" Comissioners for the gouernment of the said Prouince. 131 132 1 . Inpri : His Lopp requires his said Gouernor & Com missioners th? in their voyage to Mary Land they be very carefull to preserue vnity & peace amongst all the passengers on Shipp-board, and that they suffer no scandall nor offence to be giuen to any of the Protestants, whereby any iust com plaint may heereafter be made, by them, in Virginea or in England, and that for that end, they cause all Acts of Romane Catholique Religion to be done as priuately as may be, and that they instruct all the Romane Catholiques to be silent vpon all occasions of discourse concerning matters of Re ligion ; and that the said Gouernor & Comissioners treate the Protestants w'h as much mildness and fauor as Justice will permitt. And this to be obserued at Land as well as at Sea. 2. That while they are aboard, they do theyre best endeau- ors by such instruments as they shall find fittest for it, amongst the seamen & passengers to discouer what any of them do know concerning the priuate plotts of his Lopps ad- uersaries in England, who endeauored to ouerthrow his voyage : to learne, if they cann the names of all such, their speeches, where & when they spoke them, and to whom ; The places, if they had any, of their consultations, the Instruments they vsed and the like : to gather what proofes they cann of them ; and to sett them downe particulerly and cleerely in writing wth all the Circumstances ; together w'.h their opinions of the truth and validity of them according to the condition of the persons from whom they had the information ; And to gett if they can euery such informer to sett his hand to his Informa- con. And if they find it necessary & that they haue any good probable ground to discouer the truth better, or that they find some vnwilling to reueale that wch (by some speeches at ran doms, that haue fallen from them) they haue reason to suspect they do know concerning that buisness : that at their arriuall 133 in Mary Land they cause euery such pson to answer vpon oath, to such questions as they shall thinke fitt to propose vnto them : And by some trusty messenger in the next shipps that returne for England to send his Lopp in writing all such Intelligences taken either by deposition or otherwise. 3. That as soone as it shall please god they shall arriue vpon the coast of Virginea, they be not perswaded by the master or any other of the shipp, in any case or for any respect whatsoeuer to goe to James Towne, or to come w"'in the coiuand of the the fort at Poynt-Comfort : vnless they should be forct vnto it by some extremity, of weather, (wch god forbidd) for the preseruation of their Hues & goodes, and that they find it altogether impossible otherwise to preserue themselues : But that they come to an Anchor somewhere about Acomacke, so as it be not vnder the comand of any fort ; & to send ashoare there, to inquire if they cann find any to take w'h them, that cann giue them some good informatione of the Bay of Chesapcacke and Pattawomeck Riucr, and that may giue them some light of a fitt place in his LoppB Countrey to settdowne on ; wherein their cheife care must be to make choice of a place first that is probable to be healthfull and fruitfull, next that it may be easily fortified, and thirdly that it may be convenient for trade both wth the English and sauages. 4. That by the first oportunity after theyr arriuall in Mary Land they cause a messenger to be dispatcht away to James Town such a one as is conformable to the Church of England, and as they may according to the best of their iudgments trust ; and he to carry his ma".68 letter to S^ John Haruie the Gouernor and to the rest ofthe Councell there, as likewise his Lopps letter to S' Jo : Haruie, and to give him notice of their arriuall : And to haue in charge, vpon the deliuery ofthe said 134 letters to behaue himself wth much respect vnto the Gouernor, and to tell him th' his Lopp had an intention to haue come himself in person this yeare into those parts, as he may per- ceiue by his ma"?3 letter to him but finding that the setling of that buisness of his Plantation and some other occasions, required his presence in England for some time longer then he expected, he hath deferred his owne coming till the next yeare, when lie will not faile by the grace of god to be there ; and to lett him vnderstand how much his Lopp desires to hold a good correspondency wth him and that Plantation of Virginea, wcb he wilbe ready to shew vpon all occasions and to assure him by the best words he cann, of his LopP" particuler affection to his person, in respect of the many reports he hath heard of his worth, and of the ancient acquaintance and freindshipp woh he hath vnderstood was between his Lopps father & him as like wise for those kind respects he hath shewne vnto his Lopp by his letters since he vnderstoode of his L°pps intention to be his neighbor in those parts : And to present him wth a Butt of sacke from his Lopp w°.h his Lopp hath gitien directions for, to be sent vnto him. 5. That they write a letter to Cap : Clayborne as soone as conveniently other more necessary occasions will giue them leaue after their arriuall in the Countrey, to give him notice of their arriuall and of the Authority & charge comitted to them by his L°pp and to send the said letter together w'.h his LoppB to him by some trusty messenger that is likewise conformable vnto the Church of England, w'h a message also from them to him if it be not inserted in their letter woh is better, to invite him kindly to come vnto them, and to signify that they haue some buisness of importance to speake wth him about from his Lopp woh concernes his good very much ; And if he come vnto them then that they vse him courteously and well, and tell 135 him, that his Lopp vnderstanding that he hath settled a plan- tacon there wthin the precincts of his Lopp8 Pattent, wished them to lett him know that his L°pp is willing to giue him all the encouragement he cann to proceede; And that his Lopp hath had some propositions made vnto him by certaine mrchants in London who pretend to be partners w'h him in that plantation, (viz) Mr Delabarr, Mr Tompson Mf Cloberry, MF Collins, & some others, and that they desired to • haue a grant from his Lopp of that Hand where he is ; But his L°pp vnderstanding from some others that there was some difference in partnershipp between him and them, and his Lopp finding them in their discourse to him, that they made somewhat slight of Cap : Clayborne's interest, doubted least lie might preiudiee him by making them any grant his Lopp being igno rant of the true state of their buisness and of the thing they desired, as likewise being well assured that by Cap : Clayborne his care and industry besides his charges, that plantation was first begunn and so.farr aduauced, was for these reasons vn- willing to condescend vnto their desires, and therefore deferred all treaty w'f* them till his Lop.p could truly vnderstand from him, how matters stand between them, and what he would desire of his Lopp in it. wch his Lopp expects from him ; that therevpon his Lopp may take it into farther consideration how to do iustice to euery one of them and to giue them all reason able satisfaction ; And that they assure him in fine that his Lopp intends not to do him any wrong, but to shew him all the loue and fauor that he cann, and that his IS™ gaue them directions to do so to him in his absence ; in confidence that he will, like a good subiect to his ma"6 conforme himself to his higness gratious letters pattents granted to his Lopps whereof he may see the Duplicate if he desire it together w'h their Comission from his Lopp. If he do refuse to come vnto them vpon their 136 invitation, that they lett him alone for the first yeare, till vpon notice giuen to his L°pp of his answere and behauiour they receiue farther directions from his L°pp; and that they informe themselues as well as they cann of his plantation and what his designes are, of what strength & what Correspondency he keepes w'.h Virginea, and to giue an Account of euery partic ular to his L°pp. 6. That when they haue made choice of the place where they intend to settle themselues and that they haue brought their men ashoare wth all their proiiisions, they do assemble all the people together in a fitt and decent manner and then cause his ma'"' letters pattents to be publikely read by his Lopps Sec retary John Bolles, and afterwards his L°ppsComission to them, and that either the Gouernor or one of the Comissioners pres ently after make some short declaration to the people of his Lopps intentions wQh he means to pursue in this his intended plantation, woh are first the honor of god by endeauoring the conversion of the sauages to Christianity, secondly the aug mentation of his ma""'s Empire & Dominions in those parts of the world by reducing them vnder the subiection of his Crowne, and thirdly by the good of such of his Countreymen as are willing to aduenture their fortunes and themselves in it, by endeauoring all he cann, to assist them, that they may reape the fruites of their charges & labors according to the hopefulnes of the thing, w'.h as much freedome comfort and in- eouragement as they cann desire ; and wth all to assure them, that his Lopps affection & zeale is so greate to the aduancement of this Plantacon and consequently of their good, that he will imploy all his endeauors in it, and that he would not haue failed to haue conie himself in person along wth them this first yeare, to haue beene partaker w'h them in the honor of the first voyage thither, but that by reasons of some vnexpected 137 accidents, he found it more necessary for their good, to stay in England some time longer, for the better establishment of his and their right, then it was fitt that the shipp should stay for him, but that by the grace of god he intends wthout faile to be w'h them the next year : And that at this time they take occa sion to minister an oath of Allegeance to his ma* vnto all and euery one vpon the place, after hauing first publikely in the presence of the people taken it themselues ; letting them know that his Lopp gaue particuler directions to haue it one of the first thinges that were done, to testify to the world that none should enioy the benefitt of his ma"fB gratious Grant vnto his L°pp of that place, but such as should giue a pubKque assur ance of their fidelity & allegeance to his ma".6. 7. that they informe themselues what they cann of the present state of the old Colony of Virginea, both for matter of gouernment & and Plantacon as likewise what trades they driue both at home and abroade, who are the cheife and richest men, & haue the greatest power amongst them whether their clamors against his Lopps pattent continue and whether they increase or diminish, who they are of note, that; shew them selues most in it, and to find out as neere as they cann; what is the true reason of their disgust against it, or whether there be really any other reason but what, being well examined proceedes rather from spleene and malice then from any other cause ; And to informe his L°pp exactly what they vnderstand in any of these particulers. 8. That they take all occasions to gaine and oblige any of the Councell of Virginea, that they shall vnderstand incline to have a good correspondency w'.*1 his Lopps plantation, either by permission of trade to them in a reasonable proportion, w'hin his Loppa precincts; or any other way they can, so it be cleerely vnderstood that it is by the way of courtesy and not of right. 18 138 9. That where they intend to settle the Plantacon they first make choice of a fitt place, and a competent quantity of ground for a fort wthin wch or neere vnto it a convenient house, and a church or a chappel adiacent may be built, for the seate of his Lopp or his Gouernor or other Comissioners for the time being in his absence, both woh his Lopp would haue them take care should in the first place be erected, in some propor tion at least, as much as is necessary for present yse though not so compleate in euery part as in fine afterwards they may be and to send his Lopp a Piatt of it and of the scituation, by the next oportunity, if it be done by that time, if not or but part of it neuertheless to send a Piatt of what they intend to do in it. That they likewise make choisc of a fitt place neere vnto it to seate a towne, 10. That they cause all the Planters to build their houses in as decent and vniforme a manner as their abilities and the place will afford, & neere adioyning one to an other, and for that purpose to cause streetes to be marked out where they intend to place the towne and to oblige euery man to buyld one by an other according to that rule and that they cause diuisions of Land to be made adioyning on the back sides of their houses and to be assigned vnto them for gardens and such vses according to the proportion of euery ones building and adven ture and as the conveniency of the place will afford w6h his ,Lopp referreth to their discretion, but is desirous to haue a par- ticuler account from them what they do in it, that his Lopp may be satisfied that euery man hath iustice done vnto him, 11. That as soone as conveniently they cann they cause his Lopps surveyor Robert Simpson to survay out such a proportion of Land both in and about the intended towne as likewise wthin the Countrey adioyning as wilbe necessary to be assigned to the present aduenturers, and that they assigne euery adven- 139 turei* his proportion of Land both in and about the intended towne, as alsoe w'hin the Countrey adioyning, according to the proportion of his aduenture and the conditions of plantacon propounded by his Lopp to the first aduenturers, woh his Lopp in convenient time will confirme vnto them by Pattent. And heerein his Lopp wills his said Gouernor and Comissioners to take care that in each of the aforesaid places, that is to say in and about the first intended Towne and in the Countrey adiacent they cause in the first and most convenient places a proportion of Land to be sett out for his Lopp* owne proper vse and inheritance according to the number of men he sends this first yeare vpon his owne account ; and as he alloweth vnto the aduenturers, before any other be assigned his part; wth w"? (although his Lopp might very well make a difference of proportion between himself and the aduenturers) he will in this first colony, content himself, for the better encouragement and accomodation of the first aduenturers, vnto whom his Lopp conceiue himself more bound in honor and is therefore desirous to giue more satisfaction in euery thing then he intends to do vnto any that shall come heereafter. That they cause his Lopps survayor likewise to drawe an exact mapp of as much of the countrey as they shall discouer together wth the soundings of the riuers and Baye, and to send it to his Lopp. 12. That they cause all the planters to imploy their seruants in planting of sufficient quantity of come and other prouision of victuall and that they do not suffer them to plant any other comodity whatsoeuer before that be done in a sufficient pro portion w°.h they are to obserue yearely. 13. That they cause all sorts of men in the plantation to be mustered and trained in military discispline and that there be days appoynted for that purpose either weekely or monthly according to the conueniency of other occasions ; woh are duly 140 to be obserued and that they cause constant watch and ward to be kept in places necessary. 14. That they informe themselues whether there be any convenient place wthin his Lopps precincts for the making of Salt whether there be proper earth for the making of salt- peeter and if there be in what quantity; whether there be probability of Iron oare or any other mines and that they be carefull to find out what other coinodities may probably be made and that they giue his Lopp notice together wth their opinions of them. 15. That In fine they bee very carefull to do iustice to euery man wthout partiality, and that they auoid any occasion of difference w'h those of Virginea and to haue as litle to do wth them as they cann this first yeare that they conniue and suffer litle iniuryes from them rather then to engage themselues in a publique quarrell w"' them, woh may disturbe the buisness much in England in the Infancy of it. And that they giue vnto his Lopp an exact account by their letters from time to time of their proceedings both in these instructions from. Article to Article and in any other accident that shall happen worthy his Lopps notice, that therevpon his L°.pp may giue them farther instructions what to doe and that by euery conveyance by woh they send any letters as his Lopp would not haue them to omitt any they send likewise a Duplicate of the letters w0"1 they writt by the last conveyance before that, least they should haue failed and not be come to his Lopps hands. 141 No. 2. THOMAS SMITH'S ACCOUNT OF HIS CAPTURE. [Superscription.] Mf Tho : Smiths relation of his voyage when hee was taken by the Marylanders 1635 The relacon of Tho : Smith of his voyage to Potuxant Riuer in the Pinacc the Long Tayle wherein hee was taken by the Marylanders. The 26th day of March 1635 I being sent in the Pinace the long taile by Cap? William Claiborne to trade for corne and furs, the said Cap? Claiborne haueing deliuered mee a Coppie of his maf letter lately sent vnto him for the confermacon of the Comission formerly graunted vnto the said Cap? Claiborne for trade in the Collonies of America. The 4th day of Aprill I arriued at Mattapany. The 5th day Cap? Hen : ffleet and Cap? Humber w*? a Company of men came ouer land thither and demaunded by what power I traded I tould them by vertue of his ma" Comission and letter graunted to Cap? Claiborne of woh I had coppics of each they demaunded the sight of them w°h I shewed them they peruse- ing of them Cap? ffleete replyed that this paper did not any way Hcense the said Cap? Clayborne to trade any further then the He of Kent and that I must goe for Maryland wth the Pinace, but Cap? Humber replied it was a false Coppie and grounded vpon false informacon, and soe turned himselfe to Cap? ffleete said come let vs board them woh they did 142 notwthstanding I tould them they had best take heede what they did it was not good iesting wth paper woh came from his ma'!6. Cap? ffleete, Cap? Humber wth the rest of theire Companie entred the vessell the Longtaile and turned our men on shore wthout any armes to defend themselues from the natiues not- w'hstanding I entreated them not to leaue our men wthout armes ashore, to w6h Cap? ffleete answered they were as safe as if they were aboard. I desired them to shew mee their Comission by wob they tooke vs but they would shew mee none. The next day they sent for our men a board and turned them into theire barge : who had that night lien in the woods very dangerously the natiues being vp in armes amongst themselues. The said Cap? ffleet comaunded mee to 'goe for Maryland w"1 him in our little boate and spake with the Gouernor wch I did and by the way wee had some discourse about the accusacon for w°.h Cap' Claybourne was last yeare accused of by the Mary landers for complotting wth the Indians to cutt off the English that were at Yawocomoco : Cap? ffleet told mee, that woh hee said of that busines was drawne from him by a wile, in comon discourse and that hee was verie sorrie for speaking any such thing, and that although it bee reported in Virginia that hee had taken his oath of those things, yet it was not soe, and that hee did not take it to bee an oath, for all that was done done was the Gouernor gaue him the said ffleet a little latine booke, and bade him kisse it saying nothing and if there were any such busines reported amongst the Indians about Cap' Claiborne yet they were a people that were not to be beleeued and the said ffleet said to mee, before God I did not know it was a testament, the said ffleete told mee when Cap? Cornwallis and Mr Hally brought him a writting and asked him whether 143 hee would set his hand to itt, ffirst haueing caused them to put out many things that were in it soe by their perswations set his hand to it. "When wee came to Maryland I found the Gouerno? was not there, Cap? Cornewalles being left his deputie I went to him and told him, that Cap? ffleet had taken our Vessell and turned our men a shore Cap? Cornewalles told mee they did noe more then what they had order for to doe by Comission to make stay of all vessells woh they should find trading wthin the Prouince of the Lord Baltimore : the said Cap' desired to see the Comission by woh I traded and haueing seene the foure Coppies hee told mee hee did wonder much at Cap? Claibornes strange proceedings for said hee were this a true coppie it hath only relation to the Hand where hee liueth but said hee doubted truth of this papf first in regard they were grounded vpon false informacon I told him I would bee deposed they were true Coppies to woh hee said my oath was as good as nothing the said Cap? told mee, hee would the uext morning goe with mee abord w6h the next Day hee did, and when I came abord I found all the men turnd a shore againe w'hout any armes to defeud themselues from the natiues, haueing not long been there and had some discourse w'h Cap? Humber hee tould mee the vessell must goe for Maryland and there stay vntill the Gouernor came home : and if I and the rest would goe with him by land wee should bee welcome for in the boate wee should not goe, he leauing the charg of the vessell with Capt : Humber I desired to leaue one to looke to the trucke wch the said Cap? denied : ffurther the said Cap? told mee that if there were any such letters graunted by his ma"8 it was got by indirect waies in regard they had noe notice thereof from the Lord Baltimore I desired wee might returne home if not all yet one wcb was denied, and being all turned ashore without any peece or armes but one peece which I had myselfe. 144 Within 2 daies after our being there the Gouernor came home who when our vessell was come about sent for vs to waite on his pleasure when wee should bee called being seet at Cap? Cornewalles house accompanied with the said Cap' and one Mr Greene sent his Marshall for mee, when I came the Gouernor told mee hee vnderstood that some of his "people had made staie of a vessell of Cap? Claibornes of woh I had comaund of I told they had, hee demaunded of mee whether I traded for myselfe or for Cap? Claiborne I told him for Cap' Claiborne hee demaunded a note vnder my hand to testifie as much, w°h I making a stand at, hee told mee he would keepe mee prisoner to answere it, if I would not set my hand to a note woh they made woh I did. Hee demaunded what Comis sion I had to trade I told him I had a Coppie of his ma?8 Comission graunted to Cap? Claiborne and also a Coppie of a letter sent by his ma"" for tlie confirmation of the same the Gouernor told mee for his former Comission it was worth nothing because hee was not to trade wtbin theire limitts, and for the Coppie of his ma" letter hee said was a paper without any publick notaries hand and was worth nothing- being grounded ypon false informacon and that hee had seene one of them in Virginia and if it were true it was gotten " by some indirect meanes for they had not any notice of it from the Lord Baltimore, and that hee intended to keepe the vessell wth the goods I demaunded of him how wee should get home hee told mee should not returne for Kent but hee would send vs for England or for Kecotan I told him wee were in want of corne, hee said it could not bee, I offered to bee deposed that the Coppies were true, and that I had examined them, hee said my oath is as good as nothing, the next day hee sent for all the goods a shore wthout any knowledg of myne or any of our companies and brooke open a chest wch was both locked and 145 nayled, the goods being ashore I desired our Invoyce wth a certificate to shew the reason of staying the vessell woh with much a doe I had, some of our Beauer I see presently disposed of and some of the cloth I saw sold to an indian haueing spent 4 or 5 daies there and seeing noe hopes of haueing our vessell againe I desired the Gouernor wee might returne home w*h with some other meanes I made by some friends hee graunted wee should goe : but hee was sorrie hee had noe boate to send vs home in : hauing at that tyme 3 boates riding at his dore. I told him if there was noe other way I would make some meanes by the indians woh hee graunted I should doe, the next day wee were sent away without either peece or victualls but one peece woh I had myselfe haueing 20 leagers to goe w'hout any meanes but such as wee should find from the Indians woh with greate danger it pleased god to send vs safe home This I will bee readie to, iustifie vpon oath whensoeuer I shall bee therevnto called Tho : Smith. No. 3. HENRY EWBANK'S ACCOUNT OF HIS CAPTURE. [Indorsement.] Copie of Henry Ewbancks Relation Of his being Seized at the head of Patuxent in April 1635. The Relation of Henry Ewbanck concerninge his beinge taken Prisoner at Mattappany at the head of Pataxunt River the 5th of Aprill 1635. 19 146 I beinge at an Indian Towne caled Mattappany at the head of Potaxunt River tradinge for ffurrs by the appointm' of Cap? Clayborne there came vnto me ouer Land Cap? ffleete Cap? Humber and two more charginge me by virtue of their Comission graunted from his Ma"6 to the Lo : Baltimore to goe alonge w'h them to Mary-Land, to answer my tradinge before the Gouernof and that if I would not goe along quietly Cap' Humber told me that he would haue the Indians carry me wether I would or noe, soe I went alonge w'h them yet Cap' ffleete before fearinge that I would haue run away pmised the Indians that if I ran away the first of them that layd hands vpon me to stay me, he would giue them an hundred armes length Roneoke. beinge come from Mattappany to Potaxun Riuer there in Cap? Claybornes Pinnace wth Mf Smith and his Company or men beinge all on Shoare but a little Boy who was aboard, Cap? ffleete and Cap? Humber tooke or small wherry and would haue gon aboard the said Pinnace, refusinge at first to take Mf Smith alonge w'h them, who was aboard their Barge, he callinge to them and tellinge them th' he had his Ma'." Comission to trade, they then tooke him into the wherry and Rowed aboard the Pinnace and said that they would take her notwthstandinge that Comission Mf Smith shewed them accountinge it and callinge it a Pap sayeing that it was a false Copy and if it were granted to Cap? Clay borne from his Ma".e it was granted and grownded vpon false Informacons & soe it was worth nothinge soe Cap' Humber bid his men haueing all ready boarded or Pinnace to waigh Anchor and fall Downe towards Maiy Land, by the way we stopped at an Indian Towne called Potaxun where I would haue gon a shoare but Cap' Humber would not lett me. from thence we rowed downe to the Mouth of the Riuer where we were turned a shoare out of or Pinnace w'hout or Armes to 147 travell to Mary Land on foote, beinge comen thither wee remayned 3 or 4 dayes before wee could speake wth the Gouer- nor who at last beinge set in Court w'h Cap' Cornwallys and Mr Greene he sent for me in, when I came to the Gouorno' he said vnto me, did you come Sirrah from Mattappany I ans wered him yes againe, he asked me what I did there and who sent me. I told him I traded for furrs wth the Indians and that Cap' Clayborne sent me, Againe he said Sirrah how durst yo" trade there, knoweinge it was in the prcincts of this Pro vince and knoweinge of Cap' Claybornes vnlawfull and dis honest practizes, w'h the Indians to cutt of this or Plantacon yo" beinge the Interpter and Instrum' to doe it, I replyd that I did not know that it was in their prcincts, nor that Cap' Clayborne had euer practized wtb the Indians against them and that for my owne pte I would be deposd vpon my oath th' I was neuer an Instrum? or Interp'ted to the Indians for Cap' Claiborne, in any such kind, and pfered them to take my oath of it then but they would not giue it me, then he caused cer taine writings to be made for me to sett my hand to, and they were to effect that I should Justifie that Cap' Claiborne had vnlawfully practized w'h the Indians against them, w°h the Clerke to my best remembrance in readinge the writinge to me neuer menconed any such thinge. I had like to haue set my hand to it, beleivinge it had ben as the Clerke read it, but I takinge it in my owne hand and readinge it found it to be otherwise, then he reade it to me wherevpon I refused to set my hand to it, then the Gouerno' caused it to be changed twice againe, w* beinge don he told me it had ben all one if I had set my hand to the other, for they were all three as one in effect, then agayne he told me he would either send me to Virginia or to England for I should not retourne to Cap? Clayborne any more to be his instrum' in 148 his vnlawfull practizes, but afterwards the Gouernor riseinge from the table and comeinge to me in a Milder way then he had don, before callinge me by my name tould me if I would take imploym' from him I should haue good meanes and be welcome to him, I replyd, Sr I can not answer it to be im- ployed by yo" or any other beinge as yet Cap' Claybornes Couenant Seruant, then he said take imploym' of me and lett me alone to answer it, then he further demaunded of me if I would resolue to take imploym? I told him noe then he bid me thinke vpon it, Moreouer I heard him say that all the Baye downeward w'hin 6 or 8 myles of Akamak both easterne shoare and Westerne shoare was wthin their prcincts, and wthin 3 or 4 dayes after he sent me and the rest of or ( Company away wthout Armes or victualls to home in a Cannow a matter of twenty leagues through the Towncs ofthe Indians. More ouer I remember that Cap? ffleete beinge set at supper w'h Cap' Cornwallis and the Kinge of Potuxun fallinge into dis course of the Accusations layd against Cap? Clayborne, The last yeare Cap? ffleete sayd it had ben very breife in the Mouthes of the Indians all wayes vntill that his last voyage and that then he said he heard nothinge, moreouer he said that he had sayd too much of it, and he thought not that Mf Haw ley would haue drawen his comen discourse into writinge, if he had he would haue ben more warye, ffurthermore he told me that I had cause to thanke god that he came soe happily to take me out of the hands of the Indians who as he said would haue killed mee, wch I know to be false and not soe, And againe the Indians told me that it was by meanes of Cap? Claybornes Cloth, woh Cap' ffleete tooke in his Pinnaces that he bought the Beavof it beinge better liked of the Indians then that woh they had of the Gouerno" the Indians sayeinge 149 it was nought. And all this I wilbe ready when I shall be called to be deposed on and soe I haue hereunto sett my hand. Signed Henry Ewbanck. No. 4. SECRETARY KEMP TO LORD BALTIMORE. [Indorsement.] January 1638 Mf Rich. Kemp to x (Secretary) from Virginea [Superscription.]To the Right Honob!.6 and my very good Lord the Lord Baltimore these Present My Lord : I receiued yof Lorpps Commands of the second of August Last for the buying of ffortye neate Cattle, ten Sowes, fforty Henns and Ten Negroes to be Transported to S? Maryes for yor vse. At the tyme of the receiuing of yof Lorpps sayd Letters I expected yor Brothers arrivall daily in Virginia, but vnder standing after, that he was imbarqued about the Isle of Kent busines, I writt to him desiring advice from him, but at this date have heard nothing of him. I have onely hitherto made inquirye where to make the purchase of what yd" desire, the reason why I have not dealt further is, ffirst the streightnes of the tyme limited mee being 150 Christmas, wob was a short warning and the tyme ofthe yeare soe vnseasonable that in likely hood before they could have bene deliu'ed they would all have perished for want of fodder wch is very rare in Virginea, and I beleeve not yett knowen in Maryland, but how ever tis the Most dangerous, and only fatall tyme for Murreine of Cattle, woh they fynd, who are best provided to p'serve them. When yof Brother and I conferr, what he shall find fitt to require of mee, shall be readily obeyed (my Creditt and all my Indeavours being at yo1 Lorpps disposall) By the next I hope yor Lorpp shall receiue ouf ioint Account in the busines. The duplicates of our p'sent dispatches I humbly herew* p'sent, whereby I doubt not but yof Lorpp will observe how the old, and inveterate malice of Sf John Harvey his Adver- saryes reflecteth likewyse vpon mee, instanced in two particu lars, One about the Invoices, w°h was soe strange a thing to the Sub Committees (as divers Informed mee who were prsent when they sate about the reference of those Petitions the Copyes whereof are now sent you) that many Interroga- toryes past from them, why the two pence p Cask should be payed, and why the Sec'tarye should have it, w'h much other Language shewing noe good meaning towards mee, (for it seemeth I am a Rub in theire way) The other in that Capt West in his Complaint against Sf John Harvey bringeth mee in allso as much guiltye for re- ceiuing fine shillings for a Tickett for every Passenger that goeth out of the Colonye. The first yof Lorpp will fynd fully Answered in the duplicate if they will allow of the Kings Order. The other I will never deny to have receiued being War ranted thereto by my Commission, as being a ffee belonging to all SecTtaryes before mee and soe rated by Act of Assembly, 151 before my tyme, And yf Capt West had bethought himselfe he might have knowen, that by an Order of Court three yeares before my arrivall (himselfe being one att the making thereof) the Sec'tarye may receiue ten shillings for every passe, and soe pportionably double for all other flees more then I ever de manded. I have p'sumed to trouble yof Lorpp w?h the Copyes of the Acts, and of the sayd Order of Court hoping of yof Lorpp" favour to pduce them if there shall be Occasion. The frequent, and Constant Reports this yeare of a Com- panye comming vpon vs doe at p'sent much distract vs, in so much that most are rather contriving how to desert the place then too loose any more Indeavour heere, where noe stabilitye of theire Affaires is to be expected. Yof Hono™ interest (I feare) will not be least in the p'iudice thereof for yf some of the cheifest of those who designe a Companye be true to theire Oaths, yo" must expect all the opposition that nialice can giue. I hope yo' Lorpp will fynd power and meanes to prevent them, yf wee can leape this Rub I doubt not but ou' Affaires will run a more even course heerafter. Thus resting Yof LorppB humbly to serve yo" Rich : Kemp. After the writing hereof yof Brother arrived heere at James Towne, by whom I receiued a further Command from yof Lorpp then was intimated to mee in yo' Letter, w°.h was abowt the sparing of yof Lorpp some Sheepe, wherein I will willing serve yof Lorpp Humbly desiring yo' Honof to accept from mee Ten Ewes, and a Ram, w°.h I will deliuf this Summer to yo' Brother for yor vse. 152 Yof Brother and I have likewyse conferrd abowt yof demands, the conclusion whereof he hath pmised mee to giue yo' Lorpp an Account of, As allso of a pposition woh if intended (according to the Information to vs brought) and deuly psequted, and assisted may perchance giue a blow to the new Companye, if it be not advanced too farr allreadye. No. 5. SECRETARY KEMP TO LORD BALTIMORE. [Indorsement.] 25 Aprill 1638 Mf Rich : Kemp to me. from Virginea against Mf Hawley. [Superscription.] To the Right Hono"!6 and my very good Lord the Lord Baltimore these present My Lord By my Last of the 6'.h of Aprill I p'sented yof Lorpp w'h the duplicates of the Acts of ou' Last Assembly w'b the whole proceedings thereof, And because what concerneth the interest of soe noble a ffreind may be noe vnwellcome Information to yoV I haue herew'? presented yof Lorp.p w'b the Copye of the Pattent sent this yeare to my Lord Matravers. 153 I beseech yof Lorpp to allow mee of yof favour in the ac quainting yo" how it stands w,b vs vpon the arrivall of the new Treasurer Mf Hawlye. The generall disgust of the In habitants was and is such against him that the Last Assembly had disabled him from that place, and power he holds, had not the Governo' and Counsell curbd theire pceedings. At that tyme Mf Hawlye had given noe other account to vs of the extent of his power then what his commission expressed w°b warranted him noe further then what did belong to former Treasurers and expressly for the Reeeiuing of the quitt Rents in the Execution whereof ney ther the Governof nor any of the counsell concerned any iniurye to themselues. When the Assembly was dissolved, he then pduced to vs his Instructions, wherein ffines, and all other perquisites to the King were expresslye wlbin the Lymitts of his commission, as allso all Grants of Land were first to passe his appbation, and allowance and vpon what tearmes they were to passe was left to his discretion. In which particulars the Governof and Counsell had iust cause to doubt what his Intendments were. The Governof found his mayne subsistance taken away, And in especiall manner such a mayme it must be to all suc ceeding Governo™ that how they can Hue w'hout forcing meanes of being from the people is not in my experience of the place to sett downe, for granting the Kings pension of one thowsand pounds p annum payed after the Rates of provision in this country (hiring or building of howsing being considered) it can in noe measure giue him supportance equall to the Quallitye of his place. And for the Grants of Land as the tearmes haue ben allwayes certeine soe the priviledge and power of granting haue by Antient Charter bene given and as in all succeeding 20 154 tymcs soe the Last yeare were againe confirmed to the Gov- erno' and Counsell. This suddein Alteration as it gives infinite distraction to the people, soe it must w'bout doubt much discourage, and dishearten those who haue, and doe serve his ma"6 heere in the places of Governo' and Counsell. And heere yof Lorpp may please to giue mee leave to be something sensible of my owne suffering. The Office and benefitt of the Invoices woh was formerly belonging to the place of Secretary is now by expresse warrant a peculiar per quisite to his place (this following I receiue by information). His Intents are to gaine the profitts of the Pattents, and to haue the keeping of the Seales, what is the remaynder of my ffees will not cloth, and paye one Clarke yearely. My Predecesso'" in this place had an allowance of twenty servants and cattell w"' all what I at any tyme have inioyed what soe many servants in those tymes when Tobacco was sold for foure shillings p pound might yeild may without over Rating be valeiwed at one thousand pounds p Annum, this allowance (as it belonged to former Secrtaryes) was granted mee, yet I inioy noe part of it, though the Labour of the place be doubled. And if Mf Hawley thus gleane from mee, and wthall in crease my toile (for his Execution and Accompt will be very short w"'out my help, and furtherance from the Records, I conceiue yof Lorpp will Judge I doe not without cause exhi bits this my greiuance. Why I haue taken the boldnes to trouble yof Lorpp wtb this Relation, without the Least Intimation heerein to any other, with favour I am thus induced. Because I receiue from vn- doubted Information that the effect of Mf Hawlye his busines proceeded from yof Lorpps favour in his behalf. 155 I am from my owne assurance as confident that yof Lorpps intents had noe aime eyther of pubHq greiuance, or lessening those whose service yo" may please in any tryall to command. All wcb therefore I humbly tender to yo' Lorppa consideration. Resting. Yof Lorp?B Humbly to serve yoY Rich : Kemp. James Cittic this 25th of Aprill 1638. Yof Brother the other day acquaynted mee w'b yof Lorppa commands to ppound to the next Assembly that for the better Regulating of the Trade in the Bay, the bounds of yof Lorpps Province might be sett downe in an Act wtbin w6h those of Virginia should not Trade, w'bout Lycense from thence and soe on the contrarye, wherein I will not fayle effectually to serve yo' Lorpp No. 6. SECRETARY KEMP TO LORD BALTIMORE. [Indorsement.] 4 Febr : 1638 Mf Rich : Kemp Secre : of Virginea to me Concerning Sf Frances Wyatt from Virginea [Superscription.]To the Right Honob!e and my very good Lord the Lord Baltimore these humbly Present 156 My Lord I receiued Lately a Letter from Sarieant Maior Donne and a Leiftenant Evelyn wherein I was desired wtb all secrecye and dispatch to certifye certeine depositions to prove the designe of poisoning the Indians in the tyme of Sf ffrancis Wyatts Gov ernment, as allso • that through his Oversight and vnskillfull Carriage many people were drawen from theire Plantations to theire greate p'iudice and to the much dishonour of the Nation, to woh purpose I haue vsed all possible Indeavour and sent them in this inclosed packett w'h other materiall writings extracted out of the Records affirming the Slaverye indured by the people theere vnder the Tyrannye of the Companye. Theire further Advice was to direct my Letters in a Cover eyther to my Lord Matrevers & Mf Endimion Porter for Capt Bond (they being both his ffreinds) But I have declined that course not being Confident enough of a safe con- veiance to eyther of theire hands. And therefore Assuring my selfe of yof Lorpps pardon heerin I did pcure one Mf Clegy an Agent for Mf Jennings to direct the packett to him and by this meanes to be sent to yof Lorpp. By the ffirst Shipp the Rebecca yof Lorpp may perchance have vnderstoode of the bad newes wob then freshly arrived before the going of that shipp concerning the cutting of yo' people at Maryland. But I am confident it will prove but an Indian flam to amaze vs woh is usuall among them. My reasons being that both yof Brother himselfe and Boatcs from this Colonye speedilye went to inquire the truth, wob if it had bene on' owne Boates at least would have returned and given the alarum, for if th' be soe, the Danger knocketh att our owne dores, and wee are resolved to meete it and not Attend it. Next wee have made particular inquirye both of the Chi- cohoming Indians and the Pamonkey Indians whoe are 157 r neighbouring to the Wicocomicoes concerning whom the Report goeth, that it was committed by them. But these know nothing thereof, wob if they did, they would ffreely relate being Enemyes at p'sent to those Wicocomicoes. yf they have attempted anything and that more danger be doubted. Wee will be readye w"1 our whole forces to Vin dicate yo' Cause, and assure theire further safetyes. Thus humbly resting Yo1;8 LorpF8 faithfully and humbly to serve yo? James Cittye this 4th of Rich : Kemp ffebruary 1638. No. 7. THOMAS COPLEY TO LORD BALTIMORE. [Indorsement.] 3 Aprill 1638 Mf Tho. Copley to me, from S? Maries heerein are demands of very extravagant priuiledges [Superscription.]To the Right Hon"!6 the Lord Baltamor these be Right Honera"?6 I wrot unto your lorpe laitly uery largly by Captaine Hop- son, enclosed in a letter to my cousen Genio, and befor that in a letter sent by Mf Robert Euelinge. Now therfor only 158 according to the present occasion, I will giue your lorp.6 some acconmpte touchinge the laite assembly and the proceedings thereof — First then as I acquainted your lorpe in my former letter It was not fitt that we should be there in person, and our Proxis loould not be admitted in that manner, as we could send them, and therfor as we weare excluded thence, Soe we did not in termeddle w'b them there. Yet Iff Lugar oonoeauing that some that had relation to us weare not soe fauourable to his waye, as he desired, seemed in some sorte to attribute the same to us, But I will assure your lorp.6 that he was much mistaken, for truly we weare noe cause therof, as he might easily haue gathered in that William Lewis who is our ouerseier, and had more Proxis then all the rest, was euer concurring wtb him, w°.h could not haue binne if we had binne auerse, but howso- euer, I canne not heare that euer any of the rest weare auerse to any thinge that concerned your lorpe and therfor if he should write any thinge to that effecte, your lorpe may be con- fidente that they are meere friuolous suspitions of his owne, w"'out any true grounde. Truly the diuill is uery busie here to raise such lyke apprehensions, wob though most false, yet they serue his turne to hinder much the frute, wc.b otherwyse we might haue, but I trust that you lorp6 will be warye of them, and not doubte, but that next unto god, we are sincerely your lorp.68 perhape much more then those, who seeming more, are indeed most there owne. Touching the lawes wob your lorp.6 sent, I am told that they would not be accepted and, euen the Gouenor, and Mf Lugar said once to me, that they weare not fitt for this Colonye. for myne owne parte, seeing noe seruice that I could doe your lorp.6 therin and many inconuenices that I might runne into by intermedlinge, I neuer soe much as rede them nether doe I yet 159 know what they contained; for the temporall prouidence I left my selfe to your lorp.6 and for matter of conscience, I supposed that your lorpe had taken good aduise what occasion then could I haue to intermeddle aboute them ? The lawes w'h now are sent to your lorp.° I neuer knew nor saw till euen now, that they weare ready to be sent to your lorpe And there being hast to send them, I only gott a hasty uew of them. Yet diverse things euen in that hasty reeding occured to me, wob I conceaued requisite to acquainte you w'b all, leau- ing them to your lorp.' more serious consideration. First then reflecting on the Infancy of this Plantation, and on the many difficultye that are in conserning it, many things, that herafter when it should be fully planted might be profit able unto it, at this time seemed lyklier to keepe it backe then to forwarde it. As for example wheras It is required, that 20 men be regestred liere be/or any one canne pretend to a mannor, I doubte uery much, whether many will be found in England, that will be able and willing to uenture at first such a charge, easpecially if they reflecte, that in case some of there men dye runne away or miscarry, they must turne freeholders, and out of the remainder of there misfortune pay for euery hundred acre of ground yeerly one barrell of Corne, a paiment perhaps not uery heauy to one who gitting a maite and labouring faithfully himselfe, and taking but one hundred acre, will haue noe greate difficultye to pay it, but to a gentleman, who hath a companye of headstronge seruants wob in the beginning easpecially shall scarcly maintaine themselue, this burden will cumme heauy. And accordingly Mf Greene one of the Gentlemen that camme in the Arke, reflecting that besydes the losse of his halfe share of trucke, he was now to pay tenne barrells of Corne for his 10000 acres and that only he had three men to raise that 160 and maintaine himselfe and his wyfe confidently told me that he must necessarily deserte the Colonye. But further suppose that one should raise men sufficient to git a Mannor, Yet when he shall reflecte, that whatsoeuer happeneth, lie canne not sell his Mannor, but by keeping it he must be necessitated to Hue where perhaps he hath noe will, I doubte that many will be terrified by that hazard. Besyds, by these laws euery lord of a Mannor must pay 20 shillings for euery thousand acres, he must in his owne persons, w"' all his able men and free holders, be mustered, and be subieete to the fines and punish ments of the muster maister, who . may search his munition euery month, and perhaps punish him for that w6h he could not possibly git. In the seruicc of the country he must send 15 freemen, and by those of his Mannor maintaine them during the time of seruice he must prouide himselfe and his men w"1 nccessarie munition, he shall not trade, but be com pelled to plante, though most of those that maide the lawc, haue tolde me that there is noe commoditye to be gott by planting. His taxes and publique seruice must be more then in other countrys, because the men here are uery few, and if these lawe shall be executed by busye heads, the uexations they may raise upon uery few men will not be few, and yet if through the abuse of some base baleife or the lyke officer they should happen to stricke an officer, he shall loose lyfe lands and goods. Truly I am sure that if these things should be exactly pursued, that few would tarry, and whether if by publique lawe such things be once bruted many will cumme, I doubte much. This I am sure that some here reflecting on what they haue donne say plainly that if they canne not Hue here, they canne Hue else where, and therfor that they care not much. Others complaine uery much that by the many Proxies wob the Gouernor, Mf Lugar, and there instruments 161 had gotten, they did what they would, wthout any restraints at all. Others already question the Validity of they lawes be cause they say that they canne prooue, that they weare neuer red thrice in the same tenor, others say other things, and if the only apprehension of future consequence already beginne to affright them, what will the consequence themselue doe. Truly I doubte that euen in the most flourishing countrys lords of Mannors, would conceaue such lyke laws some what burdensom. What then will those apprehend, who shall be soe weake that they shall scarcely be able to stande of them selues? Certainly I conceaue that your lorpe will rather thinke it fit to nourish and support younge sprigs, then to depresse them ; and to goe aboute to gather frute befor it be planted, and ripe, is neuer to haue frute. But perliapes some may be of opinion, that if your lor1'!' canne but haue tlie trade of Beauer and Corne to your selfe, the plan tation is not much to be regarded. And the fewer there are the better cheire will be for them, and that amonge Ruens they shall alwaye find somc-thinge. Yet against this I would dc- syre your lorp6 to reflecte that in a flourishing plantation, Your lor1? shall euer be sure of a growing profit and honor. But in these pettye trades and in raking out of mens necessitye, the honor will be little, and the profitt uery uncertaine. Some that are immediate actors perhaps may gitt some thinge, but your lorp." shall be sure if you your selfe haue the profite, to make large disbursments, and to receaue large accoumpts, and besydes I am of opinion that god will not prosper such designes, where if your lorp.0 reiecting them sticke to your first designes, god in time will giue them a happy successe, and raise to your selfe and your seed noe small Blessinge. Here certainly nothinge is wanting but people let it be peopled, and it shall not yeeld to the most flourishing country for profitt 21 162 and pleasure, the promoting then of this must be your first aime, and this your lorp.6 must encourage by all means, and when your fruts are ripe, it will be time to gather them. Now only you must nourish plants, and while you expect fruts from others, by your selfe seeke fruts from the earth, wob may be gathered in plenty, if your lorp.6 please to cumme and see, and resolue on the best, for mine owne parte I haue soe good an apprehension of the country, that I noe way repent me of my iourney, but Hue uery contentedly and doubte not but if I canne haue pacience and expecte the seazons, I shall find as happy frute here as in any other parte of the world. But endeed the old saings are true that Roome was not bulte in a day, and that such as will lipe ouer style, befor they cumme at them, shall breake there shin, and perhaps not gitt ouer the still soe quickly, as those, who cumme to them, befor they goe ouer. Many other things to this effect will occure to your lorpe upon better consideration then I could take, yet these occuring I could not omitte to suggest them. I beseech almighty god, that your lorp.6 may make the best use of them, to gods great est glorie, and your owne temple. But now I will say some thinge of the Inconuenience falinge by these lawes of the church of god, wch should haue binne regarded in the first place, but was not thought of, as it seemeth by the lawe. In wob First there is not any care at all taken, to promote the con- uersion of the Indians, to prouide or to shew any fauor to Ecclesiasticall persons, or to preserue for the church the Immunitye and priueledges, wob she enioyeth euery where else ; But rather M: Lugar seemeth to defend opinions here, that she hath noe priualedges iure diuino. That bulls Canons and Casuists are little to be regarded in these cases, because they speake for themselues, as if others oposing them had noe selfe 163 interest and therfor must know better what belongs to the church then she hirselfe. That Priueledge are not due to the church till the common wealths in woh the church is grante them. And therfor while they grante none, _Z" doubte tlmt not only Mr. Lugar, but also some others that Ifeare adhere to much to him, conceaue that they may proceed wth Ecclesiasticall persons an w'.b others, and accordingly they seeme to resolue to bind them to all there lawes, and to exacte of them as of others, and in practice already they haue formerly granted warrants against some that dwell w'b us, whom though the shrive (who hath formerly bin a purseuante, and is now a cheife protestante) desyred me to send him downe, Yet he added (euen befor the Gouernor if I be not mistaken) that he must otherwyse fech him downe. Againe euen already befor your hr*? haue confirmed the lawes ; Mr. Lugar hath demaunded of me to be paid this yeere fifteene hundred weigld of Tobacco towards tlie bulding a fort, Wheras I dare boldly say that the whole Colony together neuer bestowed on me the worth of fiue hundred weight one would thinke that euen out of Gratitude, they might free us from such kinde of taxation easpecially seing, we put noe taxe upon them, but healpe them gratis, and healpe them also in such a manner, that I am sure they canne not complaine. Secondly by the new lawe we should relinquish wliat we haue, and then cast lotts in what place we shall chooce, and if our lott prooue ill, what we haue already may be chosen from us and soe we may beginne the world anew, and then ether we must loose all our buldinge, all our cleering, all our en closures, and all our tennants, or else be forced to sitt free holders, and to pay for euery hundred acres one barrell of corne wheras we are not yet in a little care to gitt bread. 164 3d.ly Though we should haue the best lott ; yet if we should choose Metapanian first, then we are sure to loose Mf Gerards Mannor, notw'bstanding that we haue bought it at a deere raite, and if we permite this precident that Assemblys may alter mens rights ; noe man shall shall neuer be sure of what he hath, but he that canne git most proxis in euery assembly shall dispose of any mans estate that he pleaseth, w"b is most unlawfull in the churches state, for any secular man to doe, and for ecclesiasticall persons to permite. 4tbly Taking any Mannor, we must be trained as sooldeirs we must prouide munition, we must haue in euery mannor 15 free men ready for the seruice of the country, whom we must also maintaine in time of seruice, and others things we should be subiecte to by these lawes, wcb would be uery unfitt for us. 5"/ It is expected that euery head plante two acres of Corne, wheras therfor already we find by experience that we canne not possibly employ halfe our number in planting, we must ether turne planters ourselues, or else be forced to be trenching upon this law and as more cumme in unlesse our men also increase we shall still trench more. g*iy tyre should not only loose our trade in Beauer and Corne, but euen for the corne weh we shall need to buy for bread, we must aske leaue, and if such as are to giue leaue should haue a desygne to monopolize the Corne, or for any other respects would be crose, upon what extremityes would the quickly cast us ; really, I should be uery loth to Hue at the curtesy of other men. 7l? Though I am resolued to take no land but under your lo?*." title yet time may cumme, that perhaps it would prooue noe small ineonuenience, that a conuerted Indian Kinge may not giue to him to eonuerteth soe much land as might suffice to buld a church or a house on, And I would desyre your 165 lorp.° to enquire whether any one that should goe aboute to restraine ecclesiasticall libertys in this points encurre not the excommunications of Bulla Ccenae 8^ Jn euery Mannor 100 acres must be laid out for Gleabe lande, if then the intention should be to bind them to be pas tors who enioy it, we must ether, by retaining soe much euen in our owne land undertake the office of Pastors, or lesse euen in our owne Mannor maintaine Pastors, both w°.h to us would be uery Inconuenient. 9l7 That it may be preuented that noe woman here uow cliastety in the world, unlesse she marry w'bin seaucn yeers after land fall to hir, she must ether dispose away of hir land, or else she shall forfeitc it to the ncxte of kinnc, and if she haue but one Mannor, wheras she canne not alienaite it, it is gonne unlesse she git a husband. To what purpose this ole law is maid your lorpe perhaps will see better then I for my parte I see greate difficultyes in it, but to what purpose I well see not. 10'r Jn the order sett downe for paiment of debts, I had not time to examine it, I desyn your lorpo to gitt it well pondered, for I doubte It runneth not right w'b that woh is ordinarily prescribed by Casuits as iust. II1? In the 3Jf. law amonge the Enormous Crime One is Exercisinge iuridiction and authoritye, w'hout lawfull power and commission diriued from the lord proprietarie. Herby euen by Catholiques a law is prouided to hange any catholique bishop that should cumme hither and also euery preist, if the exercise of his functions be interprited iuridiction or authority. Diuerse other things I doubte not but that your lorp.6 will ob- serue, when w'h better consideration then I haue donne, you shall reed ouer these lawes. Yet this may suffice to giue your lorpe a Caution not to be inuolued in these grose ouersyghts. 166 I hope that gods grace time and good instruction may by degrees make men here more sensable of god, and of his church and of the conuersion of Infidels hertofor soe much pretended But for the present gods cause is committed to your lor1!8 hands And that your lorp.6 may be sure to proceed right therein, I beseech your lorp.6 befor you doe any thinge aboute these lawes, that yon would be pleased to reed ouer and to ponder well the Bulla Coense. Secondly that in things concerninge the church your lorpe would take good aduise of the church. Thirdly that your lorp.6 would be uery wary not to trench upon the church and where any thinge may seeme to trench, to use fitt pneuention against the bad consequence. And to healpe to settle our quiet here. I beseech your lorp.6 to send me a priuate order, that we may while the gouerment is catholique enioy thes priuiledges follow The first that the church and our houses may be Sanctuarie The second that our selues and our domestique seruants, and halfe at least of our planting seruants, may be free from pub lique taxes and, seruices, And that the rest of our seruants and our tennants, though exteriorly the doe as others All their ten- in the Colony, Yet that in the manner of exact- nants as well • j ¦ ., . .. ,, „ , as seruants m^ or doinS xt> Priuatly the custome of other he intimates catholiques countrye may be obserued as much as heere ought may be tnat catholiques out of bad practice to be exempt- _ ed from the cumme not to iovS^ those due respects wob they t e m p o r a 1 1 owe to god and his church. [JfJukl^ The tMnl is that thou9h in PuhU(lue we suffer timore'shand.] our cause to be heard and tryed by the publique magestrafs, yet that in priuate they know, that they doe it but as arbitrators and defendors of the church because Ecclesiasticall iuridiction is not yet here setled. 167 The fourth. That in our owne persons and wth such as are needfull to assiste us, we may freely goe, abide and Hue amonge the Sauages, w'b out any licence to be had here from the Gouernor, or any other. lastly, that though we relinguish the use of many ecclesias- ticall priueledge when we iudge it conuenient for satisfaction of the state at home, yet that it be left to our discretion to determine when this is requisite ; and that we be suffered to enioy such other priueledges as we may wtb out note. And touching our temporaltyes. first J beseech your lorp.6 that we may take up and keepe soe much lande, as in my for mer letters I acquainted your lor"6 to be requisite for our present occasions, according to the first conditions wob we maid wtb your lor".6 and that albeit we now take not up neere our due, yet that herafter we may take it up when we find it fitt according to our aduentures. And if of that w6h we now haue a parte proue conuenient to be laide out for a towne at S? Maries, Be eonfidente that I will be as forwarde and free as any. Soe that things be carried in a faire and axpiall manner. But I uerily belieue that if the lande be left in our hand, the place shall much sooner be bult on and planted, then if it be taken out. In the trade I shall requeste that your lorpe performe soe much, as that we may employ one bote whensoeuer we shall not otlier- wyse use it, My reason is, because of necessitye we must keepe a bote and when we use hir not, if we haue not this enploiment for hir we shall not be able to supporte hir charge. The thinge is uery necessarie for us, and not inconuenient to your lorpe whatsoeuer some ouer greedy to engrose this trade may suggest to the contrarie. I assure my selfe that your lor?6 will not stande w'h us for soe small a matter. The game I ualew uery little, but the conueniency uery much, and 168 therfor I beseech your lorpe not to runne us into a greate inconuenience for a uery small or noe profitt to your selfe. I desyre lykwysefrom your lorp." a free Grante to buy com of the Indians w"'out asking leaue here, for endeed It will be a greate pressure to eate our bread at there curtesye, who as yet I haue found but uery little curtuous. Certainly while the cheife of this Colony thus wholy neglect planting, and thinke on nothing but on a pedling trade certainly in the Colony, they will still make a scarcity of bread, and in that scarcity if we shall not be able to healpe ourselues nor the Colonye wthout there leaue, that make the want, many greate difficul- tyes may follow. Certainly I haue this yeere planted, much more, then the greatest parte of the Colonye besyde, and soe intende to continue what I am able, because endeed in planting I place my greatest hope, yet for some yeers I know that I must bny, and in buying there canne be noe inconuenience to your lorp.° to grante me a generall licence. And therfor I trust that your lorpe will not denye it, and to encourage your lorp.6 to doe us fauour, this much I will be bold to tell your lorpe that though my principall intention be to serue your lorp.° to the prime end, w°h is the healpe of soulcs, yet in peopling and planting this place, I am sure that none haue donne neere soe much as we, nor endeed are lykly to doe soe much. We are resolued to Hue and dye here under your lorp.6 wob I thinke few others are. Sweete Jesus grante that all may be to his greatest glorie, and if to this your lorp.6 freely concurre, God I doubte not will also concurre wtb your lorl6 and for this blesse the rest, wob I beseech him to doe wth as many Blessings as he wisheth who will euer be Your lorpo serious well wisher and seruant T. C. S. Maries this 3 of Aprill 1638. 169 Since the writing of the former letter I am told that Mf Lugar defends publiquely in the Colony, that an assembly may dispose here of any mans lands or goods as it please if this weare once bruted and belieued I conceaue that none would ether cumme or abide here, easpecially where if any factious working man canne but procure an ouerswaing num ber of Voices by Proxes, he shall undoe whome he please, and none shall be sure of any thinge that he hath, seeing experience hath shewed that one that would labor for it, may quickly git such a faction and such an ouerswaing uoice of Proxis that he may carry what he will really I much feare, that this ouerbusye stirringe to many new querks and deuises, will neuer doe your lor?6 nor the Colony good. I pray god it doe not much harme, according to the old prouerbe that a busye man neuer wants Woe. No. 8. THOMAS CORNWALEYS TO LORD BALTIMORE. 16 Aprill 1638 Mf Tho : Cornwaleys to me ' from S? Maries Right Ho1/ I receaued y' Letf dated the 25 : of May last for wcb and y' therein nobly proffered favoures, I should before this time haue retourned humble thanks, had I not hoped in person toe haue kist yf hands this yeere in England; But yf Lop.8 Ser vice and the pretended Good of Maryland, would not permit mee toe provide for my Journy, nor yet toe follow my owne affayres when my best dilligence had beene most vrgently 22 170 needefull for the Accomodating of them toe my best Advan tage. Wob how jireiuditiall it proued toe mee heere Capt: Anthony Hopson whoe with his Ship was then vpon his departure from hense can partly informe you if you suppose it worth the questioning, And what it may bee in England should my wiues tooe probable indisposition disenable her from manageing my affayres there, yr Lop: may Imagin. Yet I think non can say that my Pryvate Interrest made mee much repine at the Authorety that comanded mee, nor negligently Execute what was expected from mee, wob though it proued nothing soe difficult or dangerouse as was Imageined, yet I suppose the Easy effecting of the busynes, doth not demin- ish the desert of good Desires, but may pas for noe impertinent demonstration, of my reall respects toe yT Lop." Service, notwith standing the many Sugiestions made toe you of the Contrary, of w6b were I Guilty more then I supposed Honor and Contiens did oblige mee, I should not I feare haue the Humillety toe deny it, obstinasy beeing allwayse the effect of self conceited opinions, of wob I hope I am soe Innocent that if youre Lop : or any other can Accuse mee for wilfully swarueing from that vnblameable rule by wob I pretend toe Guide myself and my Actions I am soe far from Perrentory persisting in my Error, As I will not only Acknowledg my fault, but allsoe make what satisfaction the Iniured Party can Expect from my vtmost Abillety. Nor can I think but I haue reason toe Expect the like from others, And therefore I hope what Agreement soe ever yr Lop: makes with Capt: Clayborne, you will eyther Include such A Satisfaction for the Damages Ireceaued by him, as shall bee worthe my Acceptance, or leaue mee roome toe seeke it myself Woh I assure him I will not fayle toe doe if ever wee meete where there is hope of Impartiall Justice, as I promised his Agents when they had basely betrayde mee. On of whom now Lyes at yr mercy for 171 his Life, And wch is Strange I am A Suter for his Pardon out of meere Charety towards his Poore wife and Children. Wob are reasons that would induce mee toe doe the Like for theyre Cheefe Capt : did hee stand in the Like circumstances, As I doubt not but hee will if hee gayne not A quietus from his MatJr : or yr Lop : for how wee haue proceeded agaynst him heere you will see by the Act made for his Atayneture, wcb comes for yr Lops Confirmation with many others among wcb if there were non more vnjust, I should bee as Confydent toe see this same A happy Common wealthe as I am now of the Con trary if yr Lop bee not more wary in Confirmeing then wee haue beene wise in Proposeing. Therefore I beseeche yr Lop : for his Sake whose honor you and wee doe heere pretend, and whoe at Last must Judg wth what Sincerety wee haue dis charged it, That you from whose Consent they must receaue the bindeing fors of Lawes, will not permit the Least Clawes toe pas that shall not first bee throughly Scand and resolued by wise Learned and Religious Divines toe bee noe waise prejuditiall toe the Immunettyes and Priveledges of that Church woh is the only true Guide toe all Eternall Happines, of woh wee shall shew oureselues the most vngratefull members that ever shee nourished, if in requiteall of those many favors and Blessings that shee and her devoute Servants haue obtayned for vs, wee attempt toe depriue her or them, of more then wee can giue them or take from them, with out paying such A Price as hee that Buyes it will repent his Bargayne. What are her Greevances, and how toe bee remedyed, you will I doubt not vnderstand at Large from those whoe are more knowing in her rights and Consequently more sensyble of her Iniuryes then such an Ignorant Creature as I am. Wherefore now all that belongs toe mee, is only toe importune yr. Lop : in whose powre t'is yet toe mend what wee haue done Amis, toe bee most Carefull in preserueing his Honor whoe must 172 Preserue both you and Maryland. Perhaps this fault hath beene permitted in vs as A favoure toe yr Lo? whereby you may declare the Sincerety of yr : first pyouse pretence for the Planting of this desert Province, w°b will bee toe much doubted of if you should take Advantage of oure Ignorant and vncontionable proceedeings toe Assume more then wee can Justly giue you. And for A Little Imaginary Honor, throw yr self vs and yr Country out of that protection w61' hath hithertoe preserued and Prospered that and vs beyound Humaine Expectation ; wcb noe doubt will bee continued if wee Continue as wee ought, toe bee, I never yet heard of any that Lost by beeing bountyfull toe God or his Church, then let not y' Lo? feare toe bee the first. Giue vntoe God what doth belong toe him, and doubt not but Cesar shall receaue his due. If y' Lo? thinks mee tooe teadious in A discourse not proper toe the Part that I doe Act, my Interest in the whole Action must excuse mee, Sylence would perhaps make mee Supposed Accessary toe these dangerouse Positions, wob is soe far from my Intention, that as I now declare toe youre Lo? and shall not feare toe doe the like toe all the world if it bee necessary, I will rather Sacrifice myself and all I haue in the defence of Gods Honor and his Churches right, then willingly Consent toe anything that may not stand with the Good Contiens of A Real Catholick. ~Wh resolution if yr Lo? doe not allsoe make good by A Religious Care of what you send over Authorised by yr Consent, I shall with as much Convenient speede as I can with draw myself, and what is Left of that w6h I brought with mee, out of the Danger of beeing involud in the ruein wcb I shall infallibly expect. Yf Lo? knowes my Securety of Contiens was the first Con dition that I expected from this Government, wob then you thought soe Inocent as you Conceaved the proposition 173 altogether impertinent, But now I hope you will perceaue the Contrary. Nor were it difficult out of the Lawes sent over by yf Lop, or these that are from hence proposed toe you, toe finde Just grounds for toe feare the Introdusement of Lawes preiuditiall toe oure honors and freedome witnes that on Act wliereby wee are exposde to A remediles Suffering of all Dis graces and Insolensyes that eyther the Pastion or Mollis of Suck- seedeing Go™ shall please toe put vpon vs, with out beeing per mitted soe much as A Lawfull defence for the secureing of Life or reputation though never soe vniustly Attempted toe bee taken from vs, with out forfeyteing the same and all wee haue too boote. This and many other Absurdetyes I doubt not but yr Lop : will finde and Correct Vpon the peruseall of oure Learned Lawes, Among wch there is on that Confirmes the trade with the Indians for all Comodetyes toe bee ex ported vntoe yr Lop : by w6b there is now in you an vn- doubted Powre for toe ratefy yr first Conditions with the first Adventurers, wch I doubt not but yf Lo? will performe toe theyre Content, whereby they may bee better Enabled and more obliged toe prosecute the good work they haue begun toe God's Honor and yf Lo?" Proffitt. for my part I will not deny myself toe bee perhaps on of the meanest deseruers among them, vnless desires might pas for merritts and then I durst compare with him that wisheth best toe Maryland. As I haue endeavored toe manifest by all ex- prestions that haue come within my reach, nor will I yet desist from doeing soe, if I may bee soe happy as toe see this differens betwixt the Church and Government well reconsiled agayne. And yr Lo? at Peace with the first Adventurers, whoe are I perceaue noe whit satisfyed with theyre Last Conditions for the Trade, Theyre harts haueing it seems not seconded theyre hands in the Agreement, but some for loue some for 174 feare some by Importunety and the rest for Company consented toe what they now repine toe stand toe, nor can I blame them for tis impossible they can bee sauers by it. W6b made mee refuse toe beare them Company, and therefore am I now the only Supposed Enemy toe yr Lo?8 Proflitt, wch I disclayme from vnless there bee an Antipothy betwixt that and my Subcistance on this Place, yr Lop : knowes I came not hither for toe plant Tobacco But haue toe my noe Little Preiudice hithertoe imployde myself and Servants in Publick works. The building of the mill was I Assure yr. Lop: A vast Charge vntoe mee, for besides the Labor of all my owne servants for two yeeres, I was at the Charge of divers Hire lings at 100 : weight of Tob : the monthe with dyet when Corne was at 2 : and 300 weight the Barrell, all wcb besides divers materialls for it at Excessive rates is all vtterly lost by tlie Ignorance of A fooleish milwright whoe set it vpon A Streame that will not fill soe much in six weekes as will grinde six bushells of Corne, soe that myself nor the Colony is any whit the better for all the payns and Cost I haue beene at aboute it ; yet doe I not deserue the les of Maryland, for I spared noe Cost nor labor for toe make good toe the vtmost what was Expected from mee, nor will I yet desert it for if I bee not tooe much discouraged by youre Lop I intend toe be stow on 100° or 2 : more in remoueing of it toe a better Streame, if I can but see such A number in the Colony as will mayntayne A mill with Greeste in the meane time lam building of A house toe put my head in, of sawn Timber framed A story and half hygh, with A seller and Chimnies of brick toe Encourage others toe follow my Example, for hithertoe wee Liue in Cottages, and for my part I haue not yet had Leysure toe Attend my pryvate Conveniensy nor Proffitt w6b is not a Little necessary for mee, haueing run myself and fortune 175 allmost out of breathe in Pursute of the Publick good as I doubt not but it will appeere heereafter toe all impartiall Judgments, for I think allready few in the Colony will deny but that the Generallety was Les in debt, necessary Goods more Plentifull and better Cheape, when I only supplyed them, and that at the worst hand with goods bought at the Virginian rates, then now they are, when the Country doth abounde with many Dealers, for wob though I am sorry in respect of the Publick Penury, yet I cannot but Acknowledg it as A great favor of Allmighty Gods toe mee, since by it is manifested that had I had noe better motiue then the gayne I made, I should never haue put myself toe the Charge paynes and dangers that I under went in tlie busines. Though I know the Contrary was generally beleeucd in England, where I was soe much behoulding toe the Charety, or rather Iniured by the mallis of some good People, as toe bee reported for A most vncontionable Extortioner of wcb Sin were I guilty I feare I should not soe willingly desist from farther dealeing as now I doe, for seldome or never have I heard or seene Covetousnes decrease with Age, And yet I thank God I finde noe propention toe continue the troble, though I neyther perceaue my Debtors or Creditors weary of my dealeing, but myself weary of the busynes And am therefore vnwindeing myself from these mecannick negotiations as fast as I can re cover in my debts, That others may haue roome toe win what I haue lost by Maryland, nor. will I Grudge toe sec the Suckses answer theyre Expectation, Provided that the Place may thriue as well as they, for I profes myself soe reall A well wisher towards it, That all Pryvate respects are vndervallued if they Stand in Competition with the Publick good. Though I think non hath had les encouragement toe continue theyre good wills toe that or youre Lo?" Service then myself. It 176 beeing thought tooe much after all the Labors and Dangers that I haue run through, and all the Costs and Charges that I haue been att, that I should share in any Proffitts that the Place affords, though for the mayntayneing of myself and famely vpon the Place I haue hithertoe yeerely Exhausted soe great A part of A Poore younger brothers fortune, as if I continue it with out some releeue it must needes in time make me vncapable of doeing good toe that or myself. Toe prevent wob I was this yeere determined toe haue waighted vpon yf Lo? in England, and on way or other toe haue Con cluded this fateall difference aboute the Trade, for my Lord I may properly vse the words of the Ghospell, I cannot Digg and to Begg I am Ashamed, if therefor yf Lo? nor y' Coun try will afford mee noe other way toe support the great Expenses that I haue beene and dayly am at for my Sub- cistans heere, but what I must fetch out of the Grounde by Planting this Stincking weede of America, I must desert the Place and busynes, w°b I confes I shall bee loth toe doe, soe Cordiall A lover am I of them both, yet if I am forst toe it by discourteous Iniuries I shall not weepe at parting nor despayro toe finde heauen as neere toe other parts as Mary land. But I will first doe my Endeavor toe Compose things soe as non shall say heereafter that I lost A right I bought soe deere through negligens or Ignorans. Other mens Imagina tions are noe infallible presidents toe mee, nor will the multi tude of names nor Seales, moue mee toe bee A foole for Com pany, for what in them was only Inadvertens, non would tearm less then foolery in mee, whoe might or ought toe know by experiens, that it is impossible toe Comply with the Conditions mentioned in the Lease and bee A Sauer by them. And yet for my refuseing toe doe like the rest I doubt not but I am Sugiested the only Antagonist toe yr Lo?8 Proffitt. When if 177 the thing were rightly vnderstood you would Acknowledg that I haue done you more right then myself, by not Sub- scribeing toe what I should' never haue intended willingly toe performe, there wanting not meanes by the neighbourhood of Virginia toe haue Easely Avoyded it. Soe that the Event would haue been insteade of the Expected Proffit, the los of the best part of the trade, wob would haue been drawne out of yr Territoryes by yr own Subiects, whoe beeing there by forst toe shelter themselues vnder another Government, and finde- ing perhaps A Little Sweetnes in it, would quickly grow toe such an Avertion agaynst this Supposed oprestion, As nothing would bee more hatefull toe them then you and y' Au- thorety, And Consequently non soe forward toe depres both that and you, as those that otherwise would bee Zealous Defenders of you both. Had my owne right noe ref- erens toe these reasons my Single opposition would haue Appeered more meritorious then blameable, nor would that alter the Case did you but vnderstand how Httle my pry- vate Proffit would haue beene preiudised by it. All the Inconveniens that I can reflect on toe myself, would haue beene my fetching the Truck, and carrying what beaver I could get, from and toe Virginia without bayting at St. Maryes. for I think non of the Adventurers would haue grudged mee A little share with them, or at Least denyed toe wink at my proceedeings if they had met mee, but rather perhaps haue done the like themselues, and where then had beene yr Lops pretended proffitt. But these are my Lord wayse soe Contrary toe my disposition, as I scorn toe profes the practiseing. I protest toe yr Lo? that I am Ashamed toe heare Strangers sometimes take notis of what I haue done and suffered for you and youre Country, and yet toe conclude that neyther my person nor my Estate is secure from Iniury if I 23 178 venture for toe trade in Maryland, without beeing behoulding toe my Servants Secresy, or goeing with as much ¦ Cawtion as if I stoale what I gott. wob poore kinde of proceedeing is so dis- tastfull toe mee that though I haue beene (for Avoydeing greater Inconvenienses) contented for A time toe stoope vnder the burthen, yet am I soe weary of the weight as deemeing it tooe vnworthy of my Longer Patiens that I am resolued toe desert the Place, if neyther the right of my first Adventure, nor the Suckceedeing Exprestions of my fidellety toe yr Service and yr Countryes good can merrit soe much favoure from y' Lo? as toe permit mee freely for toe rent at least soe much yearely as I ventured before I knew whether I should win or loose by the Bargayne. The Proffit of tradeing 60 : pounde p': yeere wob is the sum I shall bee satisfyed with all, if you shall not think fit toe enlarge it out of yr owne noblenes as an Encou ragement toe my future deserts, will vndoubtedly never make mee rich, nor am I ambitious of it, I neuer yet pretended for toe get by Maryland, all I desire is but A help toe keepe mee from Sinking, as you may see by the reasonablenes of my re quest. wcb yet if yr Lo? please toe grant without farther troble toe yrself or mee, I shall take it as the greatest exprestion of yr Lo?8 favoure towards mee that ever yet I could boast of. And accordingly by A reall desire to deserue the Continueance Endeavor toe expres A respectiue Acknowledgment of yr readines toe doe mee right w°h if I can gayne A fayre way and youre Lops favoure toe boote, it were tooe greate A disre- spectiuenes in mee for toe Attempt the Contrary. If now therefore the Suckses answers not my Expectation I cannot help it whoe haue done my part toe let you see how desireous I am toe Avoyde all Publick disputes with you or yr. Autho- rety, whilst I am A poore member of yr Colony. What Course the rest of the first Adventurers will steere I know 179 not, for I am Left toe guide my Bark Alone nor would I willingly bee otherwise, vnles wee could vnite oure Harts as well as Purses, w* not beeing fesible, I despayre of ever doeing good in partnerships, and am therefore resolued toe haue noe more Interest in Comon Stocks, yet will I not bee much preiuditiall toe those that will, for what I promice eyther for price or quantety shall not fayle toe bee most punctuaUy performed, only I love toe bee the manager of my owne Affayres, wob favoure if youre Lo? please toe grant mee I shall not care for other Approbation. Newes I know yr. Lo? lookes for non but what Concernes the Comonwealth of Maryland in wob what I am defectiue J doubt not but yr. Secretary will Supply whoe is as quick as I am Slow in writeing) and there fore in that part A verryfit Subiectfor the place hee bears, And if hee proues not tooe Stiff A maintayner of his owne opinions, and Somewhat tooe forward in Sugiesting new busineses for his owne imployment, hee may perhaps doe God and yr Lop i good Service heere I should bee Sorry toe Change M" Hawley for him, whoe I perceaue stands not soe perfect in yr Lop" t favoure as I could wish him wch perhaps some takeing Advan tage at, and willing for toe fish in trobled waters, may by discourteous proceedeings towards him make him Weary of vnproffitable Maryland, And fors him toe A Change more for his peace and Proffit. As Doubtles Virginia would bee toe him if hee make good what hee hath vndertaken, of woh I see noe other Likelihood if hee haue not left his worst Enemies behinde him, Among woh number I am Sorry toe see such probabillety of yr Lopf beeing on as I perceaue there is. What reasons you haue for it is vnknowne toe mee, nor doe I pre sume toe Judg where the fault is, All that I wish as A Poore friende of his, is that yr Lo? rightly vnderstood him for from thens I verrely beleeue doth flow those Jealosyes that I 180 preceaue are risen betwixt you, w6h beeing increast by misappre- hentions of Contentious Spirits must certaynely if not in time prevented by some Charitable reconsiliation breake forth with such vyolens as will endanger the noe little preiudice of on or both of you. I Assure yr Lop: did I know any Just Cause toe Suspect his Sinserety toe Maryland, or the designe wee come vpon, I should not bee soe Confydent of his Innosence in deserueing toe ill from you or this Place. I cannot my Lord Suppose A little verball vehemensy vttered in the defens of A mans owne Supposed right, Suffitient toe Conclude him guilty of looseing all former respects toe greater obligations, wch if it bee soe greate A Crime I am toe seeke where I should finde on that would bee free when hee Supposeth his right vniustly questioned. I must confes I cannot pleade not guilty, and yet I doubt not but my greatest Enemies doe really beleeue mee for toe bee as I am A most vnfayned friende toe Maryland. And soe I am confident will M* Hawley Appeere if you will giue him time and ocation for toe manifest it, and not by vyolent discourtesyes vpon vncertaine suppositions fors him toe Change his good intentions y' Lop : knowes how many difficultyes hee past in England, nor hath hee beene exempt from the like in these parts, and therefore hee is not too bee blamed for laying howld of some probable way toe repayre his many misfortunes, there beeing noe Antipothy betwixt that and the continueing of his respects vntoe yr. Lop. Well may the dischargeing of the office hee hath vndertaken invite him sometimes toe Looke towards Virginia, but certaynely not with preiudice toe Maryland, from whens hee receaues the greatest Comforts that the world affords him both for Sowle and body the on from the Church the other from his wife, whoe by her comportment in these difficult affayrs of her husbands, hath manifested as much virtue and 181 discrestion as can bee expected from the Sex she owes, whose Industrious huswifery hath soe Adorned this Desert, that should his discouragements fors him toe withdraw himself and her, it would not A Little Eclips the Glory of Maryland. Thus haue I my Lord at large According toe my Capacety commended toe yr noble Consideration such Greevanses as for the present I am most sensible of, toe wcb I hope toe receaue soe satisfactory an answer from yr. Lov : as will Encourage mee toe A resolution of fixing my Earthly Tabernacle in Maryland. Though I am now prepareing for A visit the next yeere intoe England, where I will Supply what is heere wanting concern ing the affayres of Maryland. wch now wants A Commander for Martiall Cause I havcing vpon my determination of goeing this yeere for England Surrendered it vp and am loth for soe short A time toe take it Agayne, nevertlieles at yr Lop.' request, I shall if the Governor commands mee see that the Publick shall not Suffer for want of Such poore Instructions as I can giue them, whilst I am resident among them, or that some other more able man discharge mee of the Care. In the mean time as I haue ever been A ReaU Defender of yr. Lo?.8 right, Soe may you bee Confydent that I will continue. As beeing desireous in all Just wayes toe manyfest myself Youre really respectiue freind and Servant Tho: Coenwaleys from S? Maryes this 6th of Aprill 1638. 182 No. 9. GOV. LEONARD CALVERT TO LORD BALTIMORE. [Indorsement.] 25 Aprill 1638 My Bro : Leonard to me. from Virginea. the taking of the He of Kent Palmers Hand what number of people & catle vpon them. Portobacke. Cedar redd-birdmatts & Lyon. Good Brother : I haue endeauored this last winter to bring the Inhabitants of the He of Kent willingly to submit themselues to your gouernement and to incourage them therevnto I wrote vnto them a letter in Noucmber, where amongst other motines I vsed to perswade them, I promised to free them from all question of any former contempts they had committed against you, so that they would from thence forward desist from the like and submit themselues to the gouernmen? and to shew them greater fauor I gaue them the choice to name whom they would of the Inhabitants of the Ileand to be theire com- maunder ; but one Jhon Butler Cleybornes brother in law and one Tho: Smith an agent of Cleybornes vpon Kent was of such power amongst them that they perswaded them still to continue in theire former contumacie vpon notice giuen me hereof, I presently appointed Cap? Euelin Commander 183 of the Ileand w°.h formerly I purposely omitted because he was had in a generall dislike amongst them, him they con temned and committed many Insolencies against ; wherefore findeing all faire meanes I could vse to be in vaine, and that no way but compulsion was left, I gathered togeather about twenty musketteers out of the Colony of S? Maries and appointing the command of them to Cap? Cornewallis whom I toocke as my assistant w'b me, I sat saile from S? Maries towards Kent about the latter end of November, intending to apprehend Smith and Butler if I could, and by the example of theire punishm? to reduce the rest to obedience, but it beeing then farre in the winter, the windes were so cross and the weather so fowle in the bay, that after I had remayned a week vpon the water I was forct to returne back and deferre that expedition vntill some fitter tyme, two months affter in the beginning of ffebruarie I was giuen to vnderstand that the Indians at the head of the bay called the Sasquahannoughs intended in the spring following to make warre vpon vs at S? Maries pretending revenge for our assisting of our neigh bors Indians against them two yeares before (wob we neuer did though they will needs thinck so) and that they were incour- aged much against vs by Thomas Smith who had transplanted himselfe w'b other English from the He of Kent the last sum mer to an Ileand at the head of the bay fower miles below the falls called Palmers Ileand and vnderstanding likewise that they had planted and fortified themselues there by directions from Cap' Cleybourne w'.h intent to Hue there independent of you (because they supposed it out of the limits of your Prouince) and that the b* Smith and Mf Botler whom I haue formerly mentioned was then preparing to carrie a farther supply from Kent both of men and necessaries to the s? Ileand ; I thought it expedient to stop theire proceedings in 184 the beginnings, and for that purpose haueing aduised wtb the councell about the busines I sat forth from S? Maries for the He of Kent w'b thirtie choice musketteers takeing Cap? Corne- walleis and Capt : Euelin in my company to Cap? Cornew : I appointed the command of those Soldiers I carried wtb me, and afterward arriuing at the a*. Ileand I landed wtb my company a little before sunne rise, at the southermost end thereof where Cap? Cleybornes howse is seated w'bin a small ffbrt of Pallysadoes, but findeing the gate towards the sea at my comeing fast barred in the inside one of my company beeing acquainted wth the place quickly fownd passage in at an other gate and commeing to the gate wob I was at opened vnto me, so that I was arriued and entered the fort w'bout notice taken by any of the Ileand w6b I did desire, the easilier to appre hend Boteler and Smith the cheife incenduaries of the former seditions and mutinies vpon the Ileand, before they should be able to make head against me, and vnderstanding that Boteler and Smith were not then at the fort but at theire seuerall plantations I sent to all the lodgeings in the fort and caused all the persons that were fownd in them to be brought vnto me thereby to preuent theire giueing vntymely notice vnto Boteler and Smith of my commeing, and takeing them all alongst w'b me I marched w'.b my company from thence w'.b what speed I could towards Botelers dwelling called the great thicket some fiue miles from the fort and appointed my Pinnass to meet me at an other Place called Craford, and makeing a stand about halfe a mile short of the place, I sent my Ensigne one Mf Clerck (that came once w'h Mf Copley) from England) w'.h tenne musketteires to Butler to acquaint him that I was come vpon the Ileand to settle the gouernement thereof and commaund his present repaire vnto me at Craford two miles distant from thence, w°.b the 185 Ensigne accordingly did and brought Boteler vnto me before I remoued from where he left me, after I had thus possessed myselfe of him I sent my Serieant one Robert Vaugham w'.b six musketteires to Thomas Smiths who liued at a place called beauer neck right against Boteler on the other side of a Creeck wtb like commands as I had formerly giuen for Bote ler, and then marching forward w'.h your Ensigne displayed to Craford by the tyme I was come thither Smith was brought vnto me where haueing both the cheife delinquents against you I first charged them w'.b theire crimes and afterward committed them Prisoners aboard the Pinnass I came in and appointed a gard ouer them, after I caused a proclamation to be made of a generall pardon to all other the Inhabitants of the Ileand ex cepting Boteler and Smith for all former contempts against you that should w'bin fower and twenty bowers after the proclaiming of the same come in and submit themselues to your gouernement wherevpon w'bin the time appointed the whole Ileand came in and submitted themselues, haueing receiued theire submission, I exorted them to a faithfull con tinuance of the same, and encouraged them thereto by assure* ing them how ready you would be alwayes vpon theire deserts to condescend to any thing for theire goods : Afterward I gaue order for the carrieing of Boteler and Smith to S? Maries in the Pinnass I came in, and w'.b them sent most of the Soldiers as a gard vpon them commaunding them to be deliuered into the custody of the sheriffe at S? Maries vntill my returne and my Pinnass to returne to the Ileand to me, where tiU my Pinnasses returne I held a court and heard and determined diuerse causes between the Inhabitants, at the end of the s* court I assembled all the Inhabitants to make choise of theire delegates to be present for them at a generall assenw bly then held at S? Maries for the makeing of Lawes wob they 24 186 accordingly did, and before my departure from them I gaue them to vnderstand that euery man that held or desired to hold any land in the Ileand, it was necessarie they should take pattents of it vnder the seale of the Prouince as holding it of you wcb they were all very desireous of, so that some tyme this summer I promised to come to the Ileand and bring Mf Lew- ger wlb me to suruay and lay out theire lands for them and then to pass grants vnto the of it, reserueing onely such rents and seruices to you as the law of the Prouince should appoint there is vpon the Ileand about one hundred and twentie men able to beare armes as neer as I could gather of the women and children I can make no estimate, in. conclusion appointing the command of the Ileand to three of them, vist : to Mf Robert Philpot as commaunder and Willia Cox and Tho ; Alle ioynt commissioners w'.b him I departed for S? Maries, where after my arriuall I called a grand inquest vpon Smith who fownd a bill against him for Pyracie, wherevpon he was arraigned before the assembly and by the condemned to suffer death and forfeit, as by a particular act for that purpose assented vnto by the whole howse and sent vnto you, you will per- ceiue ; I haue omitted as yet to call Mf Boteler to his tryall, because I am in hopes by shewing fauor vnto him to make him a good member, but I haue not as yet released him, though I haue taken him out of the sheriffes custody into my owne howse where I intend to haue him remayne vntill I haue made farther experience of his disposition and if I can win him to a good inclination to your Seruice, I shall thinck him fittest to take the commaund of the He of Kent ; for those others w°.b haue now that charge from me are very vnable for it, nor is there better to be fownd vpon the Ileand, but least (Boteler demeaning himselfe otherwise then well) and that I should finde cause to thinck him fitter to be punished then 187 pardoned there should want meanes to giue him condigne pun ishment for all his former offences ; I desire you would send ouer an act the next yeare w'.h your assent thereto, to be pro posed to an assembly in Maryland for theire assent censureing Boteler as Smith was for Pyracie wcb he committed at the head of the bay neer Palmers Ileand in the yeare 1635 vpon a Pinnasse belonging to S? Maries by takeing and a great quantitie of trucking commodities from Jhon Tomkins and serieant Robert Vaughan who had the charge of her and togeather w'b the s1? Pinnass and goodes carried the ad. Tom- kins and Vaughan prisoners to Kent. Smith hath solicited you I suppose by his letters for his pardon but I shall desire you that you would leaue it to me to do as I shaU finde him to deserue ; whereby (if it be possible he should be the better for it) it will take better effect w'b him when he shall coutinue at my mercie vnder whose eye he is : Palmers Ileand beeing already seated and fortifyed and a good stock of cattle to the number of thirteen head put vpon it, I thought not good to supplant but vnderstanding there were fiue men inhabiting it seruants to Cap? Cleyborne and formerly vnder the command of Smith I sent serieant Robert Vaugham and two others w'b him from S? Maries to set downe there and to the sd : Vaugham gaue the commaund of all the rest, and by reason Cap? Cleyborne hath been attainted of ffelony in the last assembly at S? Maries by particular act and sentenced to for feit all his estate in the Prouince I gaue Vaugham authoritie to take the seruants and other goodes and chatties belonging to Cleyborne vpon the Ileand, into his charge and to haue them forth commeing when they shall be demaunded of him togeather wtb what profitt shall be made by the serieants labors. I am informed that vpon occasion of discourse giuen before Sf Jhon Haruey Mf Kempe and Mf Hawley by 188 Mf Boteler whether Palmers He were w'bin the Prouince of Maryland or no Mf Hawley did so weackly defend your title to it that Boteler grew more confident of proceeding in plant ing it for his Brother Cleyborne and I haue some reason to thinck that Mf Hawley did willingly let your title fall for some designe sake of his owne vpon trade w'.b the Sasquahan- noughs wcb he might conceiue better hopes to advance by its depenice on Virginia then on Maryland, for when I sat in counsell at S? Maries about the expedition I made to Kent to stop the proceedings of that designe of Boteler and Smiths planting it, he earnestly diswaded it by suggesting all the reasons he could to make your title doubtfull to it the Ileand and then how vnlawfull an act it would be to hinder theire planting it, and though it was made appeare that theire seat ing there was most dangerous to the Colony at S? Maries by reason that they had incouraged the Indians to set vpon vs and might hereafter furnish them w"1 gunns to our further harme if we should suffer them to proceed, whereas otherwise Boteler and Smith beeing remoued we might hope to make a peace w'b those Indians yet it seemed some designe he had, upon theire setting downe there was so deare vnto him that he preferred it before the safetie of all vs and his owne family beeing included in the daunger, and would needs haue perswaded it to be in Virginia though the express words of your pattent limits the Prouince to the northward where New England ends but it is apparent that the Hand is wtbin your Prouince for the line of fortie by Smiths map by w°.b the Lords Refferies lade out the bonds lyeth right ouer the first falls and this Ileand is fowre miles to the sowtherd below those falls as I can witnes for I was there the last summer and obserued it. I beleeue the faire promises wcb he made you in England whe you procured the preterm? he hath in Virginia 189 how vsefull he would proue to your Colony by it, will neuer be performed by him for nothing moueth him but his owne ends and those he intendeth wholly to remoue from Maryland and place the in Virginia, and intendeth shortly to remoue his wife and family thither, I am sorry it was your ill fortune to be a meanes of so much good to him who is to ingratefull for it, for he disclaimes that he euer sought your help or had any from you towards his preferm? for he thincketh you did not so much as know he pretended to the place he hath nor that you knew he had it vntill a long tyme after it was passed vnto him thus Cap? Cornewallis telleth me hath heard him say, and he is of such greeuance vnto the Gouernor and Secretarie of Virginia that they promise to themselues nothing but mine by his draweing all the perquisites of theire two places from them, and do therefore wonder that you would be the meanes of procureing such a place for him, they do both intend by theire letters to solicite your help for the remoueing him and it were well for both Colonies that he were, for he can not haue less power, then too much in that Colony w°h (by impou- erishing Sf Jhon Haruey and draweing from him and the secretarie the execution of all the cheife seruices w°.b the Kings proffitts and the peoples estates hath dependencie on he will bring vnto himselfe ; so that Maryland wherein it shall haue occasion to vse Virginia is like shortly to seeck for it onely to him where there is nothing to be hoped for but what is vnseruiceable to his owne ends and nothing scapeth his de- signmt though it be neuer so much beyond his reach to compass. The body of lawes you sent ouer by Mf Lewger I endeau- ored to haue had passed by the assembly at Maryland but could not effect it, there was so many things vnsuteable to the peoples good and no way condu3eing to your proffitt 190 that being they could not be exempted from others w°.b they willingly would haue passed they were desireous to suspend them all, the particular exceptions w°.b were made against them Mf Lewger hath giuen you an account of in his dis patches to you : others haue been passed in the same assembly and now sent vnto you w°.h I am perswaded will appear vnto you to prouide both for your honor and proffitt as much as those you sent vs did. the trade w'.h the Indians they wholly exempted themselves from and leaft it to you, onely Cap' Cornewallis I haue promised should not want the most I could say vnto you to procure leaue for him that he might rent three twenty pownds shares in it yearely so long as he is a member of your Colony, w6.b I did as well to de cline his hindrance of passing the whole to you, as also to giue him incouragement for the many seruices, he hath done yon in the Colony, for though it hath been his fortune and myne to haue had some differences formerly yet in many things I haue had his faithflill assistance for your seruice and in nothing more then in the expedicon to Kent this last winter. I would not wish you (now it is in your hands to dispose of) to intrest too many sharers in it for that hath been hitherto the distruction both of the trade and the traders, for they neuer agreeing to trade ioyntly did by theire severall trade preuent on an others marcket and by ouer bidding the prise for beauer dayly spoyled the trade whereas if it had been in one hand, or in so many as would have ioyned, it might haue made some profit to the aduenturers but in the way it hath been hitherto they that haue vsed it hath reaped nothing but losse, wherefore if you shall thinck good to let me haue any share in it I desire you would not in terest any other besides Cap? Cornewalleis, for there is none else in Maryland that knoweth what belongeth to the trade 191 and therefore are not like to ioyne in the wayes w°.h are most expedient for the good of it. if you would let it out to vs two for two or three yeares, rent free, I am perswaded it would be brought to such a state by the way we should bring it in that it would be farre more profittable and certaine then euer it was for hereafter or if you thinck gocd to vse it aU your- selfe and send ouer truck for it I shalbe ready to do you the best seruice I can but you must cause boates and hands to be procured of your owne here and not put yourselfe to hyer them for that will eat you out of all your profitt if not your principall and you must designe to place ffactories as soone as you can on shore in some conuenient places whereto the trade may be drawne for the way of boating it though the boates be a mans owne is very chargeable and vncertaine. I haue deliuered some Tobaecoes to Mf Lewger but whether it be sufficient or too much to ballance the accounts I am to passe I can not yet tell for I haue not had tyme since his commeing to make them vp it is not for any profitt to myselfe that I haue purposely delayed it, (as I hope you will do me so much right as to beleeue) but for want of Leisure from the publike seruices of the Colony and the necessarie loockeing after some meanes of my owne subsistance w°.b is so difficult to compass here as it requireth much tyme and labor. I meane this summer to pass all manner of accounts that are between you and me vnto Mf Lewger, for I haue disposed of all my other businesses so, as I may haue sufficient leisure to do it in. Mf Lewger is a very seruiceable and diligent man in his secretaries place in Maryland, and a very faithfull and able assistant to me the cedar you writt for by him I could not procure to send this yeare by reason there is very few to be fownd that are Ysefull tymber trees two I heard of farre vp in Patuxent riuer, and two others vpon popelyes 192 Hand in the bay nere to Kent, and the fraight and other charges for the shipping them will be so deer that I made a question whether you would thinck fitt to vndergo it, it will stand in eight or tenne pownds a tunne fraight for England besides other charges of transporting it to shipping from where it is felled neither is there meanes in Maryland to transport it vnless it might be split into clapboard, and whether it will not be made vnseruiceable to y" by vseing it so, I can not tell because I do not know the vse you designe it for, by your next letters I pray informe me what you will haue done in it. the matts w'!1 you wrot for amounts to such a charge to be bought from the Indians that I had not sufficient meanes to purchase it, it is not lesse then fortie pownds worth of truck out of England will buy 350 yards of matt besides the charge of seecking them in twentie seuerall indian towns, for vnless they be bcspocken there is very few to be had but such as are not worth buyeing to giue a freind, and besides for the vse you intend them it is necessarie they should be all of one make otherwise they cannot flower a roome ; and before I shall procure so many yards I must send all the Prouince ouer but if you desire to haue them and will prouide truck to buy the1? vpon farther notice from you I will be speack them, to haue them all in as few places as I can to auoid charge : I am sure my Brother Porttobacco now Emperor of Paskattaway, will assist me in it as much as he can for he is much your freind and seruant and hath expressed himselfe to me to be so and giueth yu many thancks after his Indian fashion for your guift sent him by Mf Lewger he hath wtbin this two yeares stept into the Empire of the Indians by killing his eldest brother, the old Emperor, and enioyeth [it] yet w'.h peace through the good correspondencie he keepeth w'h me w°.b aweth his Indians from off'ereing any harme vnto 193 him. I had procured a red bird and kept it a good while to haue sent it to you but I had the ill fortune to loose it by the negligence of my seruant who carelesly let it out of the cage; The beauer w°.b I sent to you the last yeares belongeth vnto the account of the stock Cap? Humber brought ouer. The Lyon I had for you is dead, if I can get an other I will and send it you. I haue had no leisure all this last winter to Virginia to procure an act to be made by the generall assembly then held there for the secureing of your right in the trade w'bin your precincts, and thought it to no purpose to recommend it to Mf Hawleys care after I had vnder- stood so much of him concerning Palmers Ileand against there next assembly w6h will be at the returne of shipping next yeare I will prouide a bill drawne as effectuall for tliat purpose as I can and endeauor what I may to get it passed. I haue sent you herew'.b a letter from Mf Robert Philpot of Kent who hath at this present the commaund of the Ileand) to his ffather the keeper of hygh parcke, I pray cause it to be deliuered vnto him and finde some occasion to commend his sonne vnto him for his faire carriage here, as he doth deserue for he came in at the first claime I made of the Ileanders submission to your Pattent, and incourage his ffather I pray what you can to supply him this yeare, for that I vnderstand is the intent of his letter to him ; I haue writ vnto you con- cerneing the deer you sent for in an other letter by it selfe sent herew'.h as you appointed me. Thus w'.b best loue and seruice to my sister Baltimore and my other two sisters and my Brother Peasely I rest Your most affectionate ffrom Virginia loueing Brother this 25'? of Aprill Leonard Caluert 1638. 25 194 Cap? Winter remembreth his seruice to you, I left him well in Maryland. [Indorsement.] Mf Lewger to me No. 10. SECRETARY JOHN LEWGER TO LORD BALTIMORE. 5 January 1638-9 If Lewger to m from S? Maries. My good Lord I rcc. yo' LoT of the 30th July : and the 2? of August, and another since by mf Poulton of the 30* July. To answere to the first. I have acquainted mf Poulton w'b what yor LopI writes touching some instruccons & directions to be sent out of England for the future comportm? of their part to yof Lopi8 right & the goverm? there, but he made strange at most of them, as if he had received no instruccons touching any of the pticulars, & desired a note of what was written concerning them that they might con forme themselves to it in all points so far as in conscience they might, neither would he beleeve that mf more or any other should give that resolution, that a Catholique magistrate may in discretion proceed here, as well affected magistrates in the like cases doe in England. I should have beene glad to have had resolution touching those cases I sent over, thoughe without any ones hand to it, because it would much have directed me in divers occurrences & difficulties w".b we meete with here, ffbr the pnt, we have no differences at all, & I hope we shall have no more, where either part can avoid them ; and for the errors past (w6h yo' Lopi.8 195 speakes of) on the Governors part and mine, if we knew what or which they were, we should be ready to amend them, & should be glad of the proffer on their part of forgiving & for getting of them : but we are yet confident we have committed none that we can condemne for errors either in point of irrev erence or disrespect to their persons, or in violation of their liberties, as the piit condition of the state there is. And for my owne part I professe before Almighty God, that I am not conscious of any thing yet done out of disrespect to their per sons, functions, or rightfull liberties ; & that hereafter they shall find me as ready to serve and honour them as yo' Lo? can wish. I sent inclosed in yof Lo™8 packett a Ire to Mf Price, but I heare no answere at all of it, nor any thing whereby to guesse that he hath received it. Let me be so much beholding to yo' Lo™ as to lett him know how much I desire from him an answere of my letter ; and that the onely cause of my not writing to him this yeare is want of matter to write of, he is one whom I shall ever acknowledge myselfe infinitely obliged to, and I beseech God reward him for all his charity to me & mine, ffor the wreck, the boate is laid vp at mattapanient ; not worth the repairing ; the beaver & peake is deliverd to the Govern' as pquisites of his office of Admirall. I acquainted the Governf w'b what yof Lo? wrote touching the 6! 10? demanded by mf Greene ; but he saith wisemans adven ture was never parted from the stock, but the proceeds of it was sent vp to yo' Lo? w'.h the rest, & that he had special order from yo' Lo? at the Cowes not to deliver to wiseman his part, So that it seems yo' Lo?i is accountable to wisemans assignes for it, & therefore I desire to have some order from yof Lo? in it, because the next winter if it be not satisfied, mf Greene will putt his complaint into the Court & without doubt will recover it ; &T would rather have it satisfied without compul- 196 sion. ffor the acquittances, the Govern' saith he did take acquittances from wintour and Gerard and others that had their shares delivered them, and he sent them by the Dove, where they miscarried. ffor m™ Eure's stock I have received the whole accompt from the Governf whereby there is charged vpon yof Lo?I 2360! of tobacco; and vpon himselfe 2636? wcb I have received of him vpon accompt; woh is in the whole, 5000 weight of tobacco, within 4! the Accompt it selfe as I remem ber I have already sent to yo' Lo? by my last dispatehe. now for the disposall of this 5000 w? I am yet vncertaine what to doe w'.h it. Kine is a very slow profitt & when yo' Lop?8 stock of cattell is come vpon the place, wilbe somewhat hazardous, in regard the place wilbe over stockt ; except they be committed to some body in a plantation far from the towne, who will have care of providing them wtb winter fod der ; & I doe not yet know any couple (for the dairy will re quire a woman) to whom to committ such a charge, ffor the present I doe resolve the speediest way of employing it to the greatest profitt, wilbe by a stock of swine, wob may be kept some 6. mile hence at the head of S? Georges river where all the cheife marshes bee in wob the swine delight ; & here I in tend to settle a plantation of mine owne this spring, who shall plant corne for the swine, and shall build sties and necessary penns for them, & shall lead them out to their places of feeding; & m'.8 Eures stock shall buy the swine, & I will keepe them for one halfe of the increase at the vsuall rate of these countries is, And if this proiect succeed, it will yeeld a very considerable revenew to her after the first yeare. To this purpose, I doe now send one of my men w'.b the Governf to virginea to lay out for 30. or 40. breeding sowes if they may be had ; & assoone as I hear from him againe, I will in hand 197 w'.b my plantation, & the building of sties to bring them into. If this designe meete with any difficulties I will send up m" Eure her tobaccos into England, to returne commodities hether againe for them, if she please to employ it hether againe, for except this of the swine, I doe not know of any way to turne it to better profitt, then to drive a trade of com modities with it, w°.b maketh yearely returne, to good profitt, without much hazard. The tobacco w6b is due to this stock from yo' Lo?£ I shall now pay out of mf Hawlies debt without lessning yo' stock of cattell w°.h I have yet beene carefull to preserve, ffor the kine sent to the Governf by Sf John Harvy, I have not taken any accompt of them, because no charge, ffor those sent from Palmers Hand, they are yet whole but one steere, wcb the Governf desired to have for his provisions to Kent; & the accompt of that & of whatsoever els I have received of yo' Lopl8, I intend to send by the Captaine. ffor the accompts betweene yo1 Lo? and the Governf he will (he saith) satisfie yof Lo? by this dispatch ; as likewise he will send an acknowledgm? for the 100! for him last, w°.h he saith yo' Lop never writt to him of afore now. ffor the Lawes I have Htle yet to say to them, (more then what I have said in my diarie) till the Assembly be over ; w°.b is appointed to begin on 12tb ffebr. next, mf Smith hath sent me over a venture of 100! but the greatest part of it in liquors, wcb I had rather had beene in any thing els, and if Sf John Simonds adventure be in liquors, I desire it not, because it will vndoe the colony. But in other commodities (such as I have sent to mf Smith for) I wilbe willing and shalbe able (I hope) to returne to the Adventuro' twenty vpon the hundred profitt ; but more I will not vndertake for. The trade of beaver is wholly now in the Govern'8 and the Captaines hands, without any rivall; and 198 they are ioined partners in the driving of it. The deere yo' Lo? writes for, I am able to doe nothing in it as yet ; & to promise more then I know how to pforme, wilbe litle satisfac tion to yo' Lo? I will lay out this next spring for as many fawnes as I can, & if I gett any, I will bestow the breeding of them ag? shipping goes away the next yeare. The Governors pinnace is now gone to Kent to be putt vpon the stocks, and by that time she is trimmed the Govern' intends to be back againe, and to bring away in her the cattell ; as fast as he can. And when they come hether I intend to putt them on the other side where Capt. ffleete planted for this side wilbe over- stockt with them ; & starve them all in the winter, ffor the Cedar desired, I know none here worth sending, as I told yof Lop. by my last, ffor the birds, I haue no cage to putt them in when they be taken, nor none about me dextrous in the taking of them, nor feeding of them, & I have my selfe so litle leisure to look after such things, that I can promise litle concerning them, and for the arrowes the Governf will take care, who hath all the commerce wth them, & for my part I scarce see an Indian or an arrow in halfe a yeare neither when I doe see them have I language cnoughe to aske an arrow of them, ffor the clerk w6b I wrote for, I am now provided w'b one whom I intend to bring vp vnder me, & in struct him in the art of surveying, ffor the merchants pipe- staves, wind-mill &c I have given yo' Lo? some accompt in my diarie. the wind-mill & housing & garden will fall to the Governf by a composition w* I made with him afore his going to Kent, that he should defray all the charges of the ex pedition, & for his hazard & charge should have all the per quisites of the warre, except the cattell onely ; and the pipe- staves, w6b he was to have at 40? a thousand : and I thinke what he hath, he well deserved ; considering the great hazards and 199 vncertainties vpon wob he ventured at that time ; & the great charge wcb he was att. The pipe-staves the Govern' intends to deale w'b mf Stagge now at his coming to virginea, to take them off & to Give me bills of exchange for 40? p thousand what he getts for them above, wilbe to his owne profitt. ffor answere to the second lfe. Your Lop2s stock of cattell willbe so sufficient here by that time they are all brought from Kent that I thinke it wilbe a needlesse charge to . lay out money for more in virginea. I think these wilbe as many as can bee well looked to and provided for in the winter as yett, ffor swine we need not much care thoughe virginea be shutt vp to vs hereafter, for o' owne colony or Kent will provide yo' Lo™ of enow to begin a stock withall at any time ; & when I have resolved whom to employ on Captaine ffleets side for the looking to your dairy, I shall then take some course for the stocking of that ferme with such swine too, as shalbe fitting to begin with all. And ' for poultry I can at this present out of my owne stock furnish yo' Lo™ w'h 50 or 60. breeding henns at any time, ffor negros I heare of none come in this yeare. I have desired the Govern' to be very earnest w'b mf Kempe to spare yo' Lo?p out of his flock halfe a hundred ewes this yeare ; & if it may be obteined from him, I will pay him out of mf Hawlies money, and next to sheepe, I thinke mony wilbe best bestowed on a stock of goates. I spake w'h Mf Coply about mf dorrells goods, & he saith that mf more hath written nothing to them concerning the allowing of mf fforsters debt. and it is fitt if he desire to recover it that he send a lfe of Attorney to sue it for him, or procure a lfe from mf more that they should pay it. there is no will of mf Dorrells yet proved, nor admraon taken out ; nor Inventary made of the goods ; some of them are yet remaining in my hands w6b I 200 wilbe accomptable for, when any one shewes a lawfull interest to demand them by, w°b yet I know of none, ffor the order w6h your Lo? saith is taken that they of the hill shall have some temporall person, &c it were indeed a very good course for the avoiding of present difficulties ; but mf Poulton (whom I acquainted wth it) doth not know of any such order taken as yet. The Vngula Alcis w°.b yo' LoP writes for, can not be had till the summer and then the Govern' saith when he goeth to the Sesquisanongs he will endeavour to procure some, ffor the tenths I gave yo' Lo?p of a generall Accompt of that matter in my last; by w°.h yo' Lo? will find that I have gathred no tenths of any of the rest, & they will thinke themselves very hardly dealt withall to have it exacted of them onely ; and besides I am very confident that their gaines of the trade the last yeare will not allow any paym? out of it ; neither vpon the whole trade w°.b they have entred in my booke will the tenth amount to any considerable matter ; so that w'.b your LoPE8 leave I intend to forbeare the exacting of it, till further order from yof LoP especially so long as they comply (as they doe begin) w'.b yof LoP" service here, ffor the housing w°.h yof LoP directs to be sett vpp, I intend to sett it in hand with all speed, on Captaine ffleets side ; wob yof LoP shall doe well to deale w'.b the Captaine at his coming into England to exchange it w'.b yof Lo? for mf Hawlies house &c if your LoP can compound wtb mf Hawlies heire for the escheate. if you can hinder the Captaine from obteining that house by any other meanes then yof Lo?8 grant, he will exchange Capt: ffleets mannor, and all the mannors in the country rather then let S? Peters goe (so they call m' Hawlies house) to woh he is so much affected for the Saints sake that once inhabited it. I have remembered the Govern' to give yo' Lo? some informa tion in his next touching the country beyond the falls of 201 Patowmeck ; and he hath promised to doe it, and hath putt it vpon his memorandums. ffor the bounds betweene vs & virginea the Governf hath already laboured it in virginea, & he hath promised to give y' Lop an accompt of it by the next likewise. ff'or answere to the third ; the Govern' hath vndertaken to give y' Lo? satisfaction by sending vp the whole accompt : by wob (as I gather) nothing wilbe coming for mf medcalfe to dispose of to mf Copley. Litle els I can think of at this time, my humble service to my Lady, m'.8 Eure, mf Peaselie, and mf8 Peaselie ; my prayers to Almighty God for his blessing on our yong Prince and m" Anne ; & he multiplie so much happines on your Lo??8 head as is wished by Yof Lo?8 most obliged servant John Lewger S? maries this 5th January 1638. ' No. 11. FATHER ANDREW WHITE TO LORD BALTIMORE. [Superscription.] 20. February 1638. Mf Andrew alias Tho : White to the Lo : Baltemore from Maryland. R. Hon"!6 Sir Hauing ended in a former my tedious apologie for my rep utation, I reflected th' I had troubled y' L? and my selfe to much and yett had filled the measure of yf LP8 expectation nor of my liege duety in signifieng such occurrences and mysteries 26 202 of the reale publique woh some solitarie howers in studie of y' LP8 happines haue recounted vnto mee. As concerning our present estate euery day bettering itt selfe by encrease of Planters and plantations and large cropps this yeare of Corne and Tobacco the seruants time now expiring : I am well as sured th' is the subiects of many better pens : therefore I will spare supfluous repetition. This yeare indeed hath prooued sick and epidemicall and hath taken away 16 of our Colony rather by disorder of eating flesh and drinking hott waters and wine by aduice of our Chirurgian rather by any great malice of their feuers for they who kept our diett and absteinence generally recouercd. Really my Lord I take the cause of the sickness to bee the ouergoodnesse of land w°h maketh the viands to substantiall that if duely regulation be not vsed the tyme of summer when the heate of stomakes is oomonly weakest eyther they lye vndisgested and to breed agues or are thoroughly disgested and so breed great quantities of blood and vitall spiritts wcb taking fyer eyther from the heat of the season our buildings beeing farre unfitt for such a climate or from some violent exercise begett feuers trouble some enough where wee want physick, yet not dangerous at all if people wilbee ruled in their diett, woh is hard for the uulgar vnles wee had an hospitall heere to care them and keepe them to rule perforce wob some worthy persons of this place doe think upon. I had my share thereof beeing twice giuen ouer ; but yett left heere for a while to amend and to serue y' L? and this Colony better then before. The reliques thereof I carry still about mee not in weakeness of body wob I neuer had less ; butt in a decay of my hearing when people speake low and I feare in tyme I may loose alltogether : yett as itt is now itt is a hindrance as well in an office I haue as y' LP knowcs as allso in lerning the Indian language wob hath many darke gutturalls, and drowneth often the last syllable or 203 letteth it so softely fall as itt is euen by a good eare harde to bee vnderstood. I am tould of one in London who is excel lent for such cures : and therefore I write to our Great man there for leaue to returne for one yeare for helpe : who knowes whether itt may prooue to wayte upon y' L? hither the yeare following, ffor wcb cause I shall humbly entreat y' L? to ob- teyne of the said party one couple more to come wtb the next Shipps to Mf Englebey who liueth in Suffolk and Mf Bcnett in Dorcettshyer who both doe infinitely desyre to serue God and y' Lp uppon this place and haue signified their desyres to mee by letter. Their coming will relieue mee from the duety I stand heere ; for one yeare : and att my returne I trust to bring more with mee, who will not come alone. This wilbee to uery good purpose, as well humbly to represent sundry things vnto y' L? w°b I dare not committ to letters wcb are no better then blabs : as allso to assist a solitude w6b since my Cosen Coplays departure thence I conceaue the affaires of our Colonye are in ; and haue not many who take them actingly to harte and euen freynds heare our successes as men doe musick for their owne curiosity : not for our good. And in- deede my Lord neyther could my Cosen or any body else tyed to other employments and fixed in the firmament of one place sufficiently doe the busines wee desyre for itt requires a whole man and more ; who will take itt to harte making iourney to and fro throughout Engl* to bring in aduenturers and putt a new heate and Spiritt of action therein : for I haue marked that halfe endeauours and want of energye begett delay and delay workes often dishonour and dispayer. I wish I might haue M' Altam with mee thither for one who is a true zelante of the good of this place, uery actiue, and stirring and hath many noble freyndes and allies who haue sent him since our coming large signes of their Loue : who wilbee able to giue 204 his disculpa to y' L? and cleere his innocency, I hope and re-^ turne to helpe the Colonye againe. Now my Lord in the interim heere is Captayne George Euelin who wisheth much happines to yf L? and the place. Hee sheweth us a draught of our Prouince deuided into Countres, Baronies, Lordships, etts. Hee speaketh of Citties and townes ; of iudicatures, iudges, armes, Captaynies, etts. woh hee tells us yf L? much approoued, and thereon certayne Gentlemen ioyned to come to us w'b 500 men : butt entring treaty about the trade of beuer they broake of againe. I see this frame doth not much displease butt itt is thought rather too timely then vnfitt for neyther haue the Indians deserted the land and left itt to our diuision nor our paucity of men as yett for itt. The greatness of the lordshippes not vnder 5000 akers and reaching to 9000 is thought by eury body too much. and would bee better from 2000 to 4000 for so, as wee stand att the present wee shall sett closer and make more roome for new aduenturers ; and haue more markett townes and some uery soone. There was allso proposed a consideration of yf LP" infinite charge about this prouince both abroad and att hoame and meanes treated how some profitts might bee raysed for the mayntenance of yf LP8 person after that decent manner as princes are by right of nations mainteyned in splendor ac cording to their place. Truely my Lord the proposition was well liked and I heard no body so forward in itt as Captayne Cornewallyes. Only hee desyred th' for satisfaction of all and for the legality of the way th' itt might bee treated in parla- ment and the pouerty and paucity of the Planters for the present bee duely allso considered, and yet some what pre- sentely acted therein : and many wayes wilbee found out. I doubt not, where loyall loue seeketh the way, yf L? is much beloued, and honoured of all. And so to remaine I humbly 205 yf LP- not easily to lend both eares to any information for emulation wilbee, and this will ouersay. I could wish yf L? a graue vnptiall freynd to write you the truth. Vis scire cuius rei inopia laborant magna fastigia : qued omnia possidentibus desit. Qui verum dicat. So seneca and an other found none to tell Alexander truth, but his horse ; who once casting him made him know hee was not Juppiters sonne when his flatterers chaunted itt to him. Why I say thus : yf LP shall vnderstand if wee euer meete. In the interim bee itt a riddle : and I re turne to the poynt againe. Concerning therefore yf L?8 pro- fitts I beleeue ueryly one in twenty of all menage and trade, for 7 yeares will easily bee graunted by our present pouerty and paucity : and when our number groweth greater and richer ; then I thinke th* wob Capt. Euelin proposeth to witt. 1. in 100 for euer little enough and too little too. If all weare of my mind I should say to yf L? as yf L?s father of glorious memorie said to mee in a lr' from newfound Land th' I would deuide euen euery and the uery last bitt w'b yf L? Therefore my Lord to act in the discipline of aflayer. the mayster-poynt is to know where to begin. Aud truely w'h dew reuerence to y' better and grauer iudg? wee must vse all meanes to full people the country for so small matters from many will grow paramount in the whole. Men must bee brought by the acting diligence of such persons in England who as eyewittnesses can ; and, as faythfull seruants to yf L? and this Colony for Gods glory, will, employ themselues wholy about itt visiting all the shyres of the Land and worke solli- citously by themselues, their freynds, and their allies : w'h such a spirit of feruour and paynes : as if God required no other thing in this world att their hands but this. To wch if itt bee added : th? euery planter for euery 2000 lb. of Tob. they gather and cure shall putt one man upon the place to serue 206 them and for euery 5000 shall putt two men : wee shall soone grow uppe. I suppose all would bee glad to bee so bound for certayne yeares. To this I shall humbly represent this calcu lation to yf LP for certayne and indubitable out of our common experience : th? if yf LP laying out 300? for transporting of 45 men att 6* the man, will adde butt one hundred more for the first yeares prouision and putt them vnder a carefull ouerseer you may binde him to giue you lOOO1? of Tob. viritim, and 7 barrells of Corne entersett w'b pease beanes and mazump w'b obligation allso to breed you 200 head of poultry and tur keys wch (excepting this last) was my aggreement w'h my ouer seer this last yeare and God bee thanked hee pformed itt well and wtb ease. I gaue him for his paynes one mans worke of the gang and his owne and all surplusage aboue 1000 a head and about 7 bfl! item a head : and I thinke hee gained nigh 100 Bb sterl. by the bargaine and itt so pleased my Cosen Copley, as hee contineweth the same one yeare more. Now my L? by this meanes you will receaue the first yeare 45000 ft) besides Corne, to vittuall y' men for the yeare following att 3 brls the head, and to buy cloathes for them w'1' the other 4 brls. woh 45000 lb. in Tob, is more then a thousand ft) storl. wob beeing turned to buy more men for the 21! yeare will putt you att 6! transptation 177 men w6b ioyned w'b the former make 222 men whose worke the 2* yeare pduceth you 222000 ft) Tob. id est, 5550 ft) sterl. wob some employed for men att the end of the 2? yeare for the third yeares planting makes together wtb the former 1143 men w6b yeld you the same third yeares end 1143000 ft) of Tob. w6b will bee able to buy and freight many a shippe. To make this solid itt wilbee necessary to haue each head the 2 and 3 yeare to plante 10 barrells of wheate, th' is, three akers a man as some vse heere : th' yf LP may bee att no charge for diett or apparell and after 207 they haue ended their these men beeing sett on Copies may for euer by their chieferent maynteyne y' L?8 house and vses with corne etts. Secondly as in ffrance Spaine and Italie, the Soueraignes doe appropriate the sayle of certayne things for themselues : So I conceaue yf L? may for a tyme monopolize certayne trades as bringing in a brikeman to seme you for yeares and oblieging all to take so many bricks of him as will sett upp so many foote of building more or less according to the degree of person : in contemplation that such houses are cheaper upon the reckoning : necessary for health against heate and coald in this country : and fitter for defense of mens Hues against the infidels. And for this a conuenient price may be sett on the thousand ; no man pmitted to make bricks but one ; vnless hee bee a seruant and makes for his maysters vse alone. The like I say off Carpenters Hatters, Sawcrs, Coopers, Smiths, etc. Thirdly, though for the present I should not aduise to deale any more w'b hiring of Shipps w°b is a busines of great entangle till three yeares of yf forsaid plantation bee ended th' you may bee able to haue two or three fayer shipps of y' owne bought by y' mens labours and seamen in them hyred for yeares w'h boyes growing upp for the sea vnder them wtb one Pilot and his mate w'b any Mayster or Captayne but yf substitute w'h a steward of yf w'h out any purser : Then my Lord the sea will bring in pfitt butt otherwise I neuer heard any way sufficiently warrented to gett by shipp hyre no not though a hyring a shippe I should lett itt to a mayster reser- uing transportation of some men and goods gratis wth out any charge of vittualing hir for if shee should eyther miscarry by the maysters faulte wob I putt in hir : or the mayster not able to pay or the like ; all would recambye upon mee. Only Sea men themselves are to deale in shipp hyer ; as I think Saluo meliori iudicio. But when yf L? hath ships of y' owne then 208 may yf Lordsh? send Tobacchoes to such places where they uent best and bring in all manner of comodityes sett uppe magazines in this Colony att reasonable prices and yett make thereby a uery great gayne : as the Duke of florence doth out of his Innes. ffourthly itt would be uery expedient to trie what wine this land will yeld : I haue a strong p'sumption that itt will proue well for this autumne I have drank wine made of the wilde grapes not inferiour in its age to any wine of Spaigne. Itt had much of muscadine grape but was a dark redd inclining to browne. I haue not seene as yett any white grape excepting the foxgrape w6b hath some stayne of white but of the red grape I haue seene much diuersity : some less some greater, some stayne, some doe not, some are aromaticall ; some not. Now if yf L? would cause some to plante vineyards why may not yr L? monopolize the wine for some yeares : to yf I/.8 great pfitt especially if all sortcs of vines be gotten out of Spaine and ffrance. True itt is you must haue patience for two or three yeares before the yeld wine but afterward itt is a Con stant comoditye and th' a uery great one too. ffifthly y' LP may please to choose some large Hand for a breede of Swine vnder a carefull swineyard who may allso looke to a heard of goates and yong calfes from milke all w6h bought when they bee uery little for no great matter will in few yeares grow upp into great flocks w^out any farther cost att all : whence you may draw for your Darys and y' table abundantly. A sixth thing offred ittselfe vnto mee much more beneficiall then all this aforesayd : wob I will not committe to writing : but will reserue itt to a meeting. Now my noble L? as concerning the trade of beauer ; what- soeuer I can say, after so wise and graue personages who haue fully considerd itt, will bee of little importance, yett if your L? pleaseth that I lay my opinion together with myselfe att 209 yf LP8 feete : and humbly vnder correction rep'sent in secrett to y' selfe alone what I thinke concerning the last concordate of fiue years. If I vnderstand not amisse the sharers are to pay the tenth of their cloath and the tenth of theyre beauer for fiue yeares and then to haue no more right in trade. As concerning the former I feare itt will haue no other effect then to hinder both y' L? and all the first aduenturers from trading att all yf L? by couenant ; the aduenturers, by impossibility of sauing there owne, wob y L? will euidently see by this paper of calculation in wob euery parte is our comon experience. As concerning the 2d. I heare men say : that if the right of truck bee taken from them first by this couert and after ward by open meanes, they can haue no assurance for the lands you giue them : seeing in the declaration and conditions of planta tion both share in trade and the land runnes in one and the selfe same tenor and would bee esteemed so if Hi weare brought to any hearing. I remember wlien yr. Lp. corrected tlie written Copiewch I made, I gaue yT. Lp an occasion vppon the graunt of trade to reflecte whetlier itt weare not fitt to limitt tlie graunt for tearme of life and notwthstanding this suggestion yr. Lp would haue itt goe absolute as the graunt of land : and now my Lord this beeing only the specially reward of the first Aduenturers, who exposed their Hues and fortunes and banished themselues from their freynds, allies, and Country to serue yf L? in this plantation : doe not blame them my L* if they feele itt and stand for their supposed right on wch their maintenance doth much depend, vntill they shall vnderstand how they can loose that ; and may not heereafter haue their land taken from them too. the forme of graunt for each beeing all one. And as for the concordate signed by so many who vnderstand little of truck and trade, excepting relinquishers ; who care little how itt wayeth : that seemeth to suppose a common stock w°b hath 27 210 ben none since the bad successe of the two former in w°b euery body was losers woh makes euery body protest against itt as an engine and mystery to vndoe y' L? and them from whence itt followeth th* howbeitt all Aduenturers in Engl* subscribe yett heere beeing no guilde nor body of traders, as they say, to carry their right by most uoices : though all butt one should forgoe theeir right; yett may that one retayne his. Truely my Ld this doth much trouble the thoughts of our Colony who takes this to bee a stepp to take also their land from them, in tyme vnles they defend this. Good my Ld I humbly beseech you for reuerence to God and y' loue to this xpian Colony of his and yf8 rather ask this right by way of honour of them for some yeares then presse itt from against their will, woh can not bee w"' out losse of their loue at least though no farther inconuenience should follow. Itt is here rather not vnderstood then doubted how such a right bought by a deere aduenture of life and fortunes and giuen as the honorary and distinctiue signe of the first noble vndertakers for y' LP8 Prouince can by any man bee taken from them. Bee the right as itt will : whereof I am no iudge, and may not speake till yf L? giues mee leaue and I am asked : I beleeue the former way as itt was att first woh begett more profitt for yf L? for the trade lyeth farre and wide out of our Colony and much in new Albion then heere : and easie itt will be for yf LP8 subiects to absent themselues from hoame to trade there or att many places besides : from whence will follow that the trade wilbee diuerted from us and a markett sett upp in some neighbouring land : as Capt. ffleetes and Roberts proiect was : and still is as I feare to a uery bad example and diminution of ours. Much better (with humble awe and reuerence bee itt spoken) would itt prooue for yf L? to haue 3 factoridges in the best places, th' is one man in each wtb sufficient truck : the one 211 at Palmers He for the trade of the Sasquesahanoes the other att Nantakoke for all the Easterne foreland and the third at Anacostans for the Mattomecks : and att the end of May our boate may goe and fetch the beuer w'.b uery small charge, and thus much I signified to yf L? by the doue and to leaue itt to yf LP' greater wisdome & consideration. And by this tyme I haue wearied y' LP I am sure : and am much ashamed at my tedious manner of expression. A pardon therefore is to bee asked : woh in honour I hope you wiU giue to this great Par- tiall and humble seruant of yf LP8 who dayly prayeth for yf LP8 happines and the good of yf Prouince Yf LP8 euer all all Tho. White 20. feb. No. 12. CECILIUS, LORD BALTIMORE, TO GOVERNOR LEONARD CALVERT. [Indorsement.] 21th & 23th of Nouemb : 1642 Copie of the Lord Baltemore Lfe to Mf Leonard Caluert. Good Brother By Mf Ingles Shipp wob is now in the Downes I sent a large dispatch to you as you will find by a note inclosed. I forgott in my former letters to giue you thankes wob I now doe, for yo' kindness shewen to Jo : Langford, woh, by his let ters to me, he sayes hath been very much : I take it very kindly from you, and I pray continue it ; for he will deserue it I make no doubt from you, and I shall requite it in due 212 time to you : the like I must and do say concerning Mf Rob ert Euelin, who deserues to be well esteemed by me; and I find by his letters, that you receiue contentment in one another, of wob I am very gladd. In my dispatch by Mr Ingles Shipp wherein one Mf Gilmett comes recomended from me to you : I desired you to take care for his soiourning some where there to his contentment, wcb I desire may be w'b yo' selfe for many reasons, but I forgott to mention his Boy that wayted vpon him w°b must also soiourne w'.h him for he cannot be decently w'b out such an attendance ; wherefore I pray take order for him they haue all necessaries of Bedding &c : prouided and sent w'b them, and I writt then to you to take care also for the sojourning of Mf Will Territt who comes herew'b to you being a Companion of Mf Gilmetts both whom I recomend in those Ires and do now againe very hart- ily recomend them to yof care : for they are both He assure yo" men of high esteeme heere ; and worthy to be cherished and valued by you, in wob you shall extreamely much oblige me. Take care therefore also I pray to accomodate the said Mf Territt w'b a convenient place to sojourne in there : and I shall, as I formerly wrote, pay the charge of it, when I know what it is if it can not be done otherwise ; w°" I hope by your endeavours it may, and I shall take it very kindly from you : howsoeuer you will I hope husband my expence herein the best you can, and I shall pay what is necessary for the sojourning of the aforesaid persons by Bill of exchange hither. The Shipp wherein this letter comes, is sett out by one Mf Douty a very honest and free-hearted Gentleman, the Master is called Edward More and one of his Mates Tho : Tilson whom you know, as I wrote in some of my other lfes. but I am desired by this againe to recomend this Shipp to yo' care for the getting all the freight you can for her there, 213 whereby Mf Douty may be encouraged to adventure thither againe in that way : for he is like to be much a looser Out ward bound : and for to gaine yo' good will and furtherance, M' Douty tells me that he meanes by this Shipp to send you a Teirce of good sack. I pray hasten the designe you wrote vnto me of this yeare, of bringing all the Indians of that province to surrender their interest and right to me, for I vnderstood lately from a member of that Body politique, whom you call those of the Hill there that Mf White had a great deale of Land giuen him at Pascattoway not long since by Kittamaquund, before his death woh he told me by acci dent, not concerning that that place was wtbin my Province, or that I had any thing to doe w'h it, for so he sayd that he had been informed and I had some difficulty to satisfy him that it was w'bin my Province, By this you may daily perceiue what wayes these men goe, and of what dangerous consequence their proceedings are to me. I pray do not forgett also to prosecute effectually the busines of the tribute from the Indians and the discouery of the redd earth, and to send me the quantity I desired of it wtb speed. Me thinkes the Indians who are christened, if their conversion be reall, might be brought to assist in their labours, and contributions of Beauer, peake &c. for the building of the New Chappell : endeavour I pray what you can to effect this. The Colony of Virginea hath this yeare by their petitions hither, desired seuerall things of the King, wob moue but slowly heere for their new Agent Sf John Berkeley, is no very good Soliciter, and regards litle but his owne subsistence, in wch he finds imployment enough for his thoughts ; his fortune being very necessitous. I beleeue that I could stand them in some steed heere in their busines, if they would deserue it of me : but it seemes I haue been soe disobliged this yeare by 214 them ; that I haue little reason to trouble myselfe in their behalf. I haue deserued better of them, for they had long since I dare say been reduced vnder that Company (wob it seemes by their late protestation they so much abhor to come vnder, had it not been for me. You may tell Mf Kemp by letter from you, or otherwise, that if a Declaration may be ob tained from the generall Assembly in Virginea this next yeare, wob may import a settlement of friendship between me & that Colony and an allowance & approbation of my Pattent, and a Disclaime from all petitions deliuered here ag' me and my Colony, in their names : and a condemnation of Cleybornes proceedings in the He of Kent and elsewhere towards me, and that I and my Colony may haue free trade for, and leaue to transport anything we buy in Virginea, without exception; and that they will make a league offensiue & defensiue wth me in such a way as you shall see cause : then I shall be willing to imploy my best endeauours in their affaires here, and I am confident I could find a way to effect those things they desire abone mentioned to their contentment : but vnless all those things aforesaid concerning me be first done by them : I will not trouble myself w'h them. Soe expecting to heare from you concerning this business wherein I would not haue you negli gent, I rest, Yof most affectionate loving London Brother 21 Nou. 1642. My wife sent an Adventure by Mf Robert Euelin the last yeare, to be putt off in Virginea for her, at the best aduantage he could, of which he hath by his letters this yeare faithfully promised to send the next yeare to her, a good returne, and a iust account thereof. I haue giuen my Wife satisfaction for 215 the said aduenture ; and I do bestow the one halfe of it vpon you, and the other half vpon the said Mf Euelin to make yo' best benefits of it, without any farther account to me or my wife for it ; and I haue herein enclosed sent you a Note of the pticulars of that aduenture vnder Mf Ro. Euelins hand w"1 the prices wob they cost in England ; w6!1 1 suppose wilbe doubled there, to the end you may know how to demand yo' halfe from Mf Euelin, and being satisfied therein, to deliuer him the said Note againe. I pray take order that in the next yeares account of my neate cattle there, those wob yo" haue of mine and also those w6h are in Kent, together wth the increase of both those parts of my stocke ; be truly inserted in the said account, for in Mf Lewgers last yeares account, they were both omitted, and I pray send Mf Kemp word that I do not like his way of paym? of the 100Ib wcb by his own agreem? he acknowledgeth receiued from me, and for w6b he was to deliuer me Sheep &c. whither I could haue liberty to transport them or no into Maryland of wob there was no mention in the said agreem? as may appeare by the copy thereof w6b Mf Lewger hath, there fore vrge him to deale fairer w'b me then so, by letting me haue so many sheep as that money comes vnto, to be sold by yof direction for me in Virginea, and turned into Neat-cattle or els that Mf Kemp will pay me in Neat-cattle to be trans ported into Maryland, for I will not accept of the other paym? and I pray do you endeauour my satisfaction herein w'.b expedition, and giue me an account thereof. I wonder why you gaue such kind entertainment as I un derstand you did to certaine Dutch, who came it seemes to S? Maries the last yeare being some of those who are planted in Delaware bay w'h in my prouince. I understand that diucrs 216 poore Planters are much preiudic'd by the Indians killing their hogges, and that the Indians vpon pretence of their being made Christians are conniued at, by the gouernm? there, in this iniury done by them to the planters, to the vndoing of diuers of them, who vpon complaint made, can haue no remedy against the said Indians nor are pmitted to right themselues. I pray if this be true, do not faile to see it timely redressed. I pray haue a speciali care of my ordnance there & send me a pticulf note of them the next yeare & an information in what condition they are. I did expect by yof lfes this yeare to haue had yo' opinion eonc'ning a pposition of setting vj> an Iron Work in those pts according to my desire to yo" last yeare, a copy of w6b pposition I then sent yo? but you do vsually omitt to giue me satisfaction in diu's things, w°.b I write vnto you about, wherein yon do not well : and T banc told you often of. Good Brother lust now I vnderstand that notw'!'standing my prohibition to the contrarie another member of those of the Hill there; hath by a slight gott aboard Mf Ingle's shipp in the Downes to take his passage for Maryland w°h for diuers respects I haue reason to ressent as a high affront vnto mee wherein if you doe not that right vnto mee as I require from you in my Instruc tions dat 20 Octobr last : I shall haue iust cause to thinke, that I haue putt my honor there in trust to ill hands who be tray mee to all the infamous contempts that may bee Laid vpon mee. This Gentleman the bearer hereof Mf Territt will acquaint you more pticulerly wtb my mind herein and w'b the opinion and sence w6b diuers pious and Learned men here haue to this odious and impudent iniurie offred vnto mee, and w'b what is Lawfull and most necessarie to bee done in it as 217 well for the vindication of my honor as in time to p'uent a growing mischeife vpon mee, vnto whome wherefore I pray giue creditt. Mf Gilmett will I know concurr in opinion wth him, for vpon diuers consults had here (before hee went) hee was well satisfied what might and ought to bee done vpon such an occasion. In case the man aboue menconed who goes thither in contempt of my prohibition : should bee disposed off in some place out of my province before you can lay hold of him for they are so full of shiftes and deuises as I beleeue they may perhapps send him to Pattomack towne thinking by that meanes to auoid yo' power of sending him back into those parts, and yett the affront to mee remaine and the dan ger of p'iudice also bee the same, for (whatsocu' you may con- ceiue of them who haue no reason vpon my knowledge to loue them veric much if you knew as much as I doe concern ing their speeches and actions here towards you) I am (vpon very good reason) Satisfied in my iudgm' that they doe de signe my destruction and I haue too good cause to suspect, that if they cannot make or mainteine a partie by degrees among the English, to bring their ends about they will endeauour to doe it by the Indians w'bin a verie short time by arming them &c. against all those that shall oppose them and all vnder pretence of God's hono' and the propagacon of the Christian faith, w6b shalbee the maske and vizard to hide their other designes w*ball. If all things that Clergie men should doe vpon these p'tences should bee accounted iust and to proceed from God, Laymen were the basest slaues and most wretched creatures vpon the earth. And if the greatest saint vpon earth should intrude himselfe into my howse against my will and in despite of mee w'h intention to saue the soules of all my family, but w"1 all giue mee iust cause to suspect that hee likewise designes my temporall destruction, or that being •'28 218 i already in my howse doth actuallie practise it, although wtb all hee doe perhaps manie spirituall goods, yet certeinlie I may and ought to p'serue myselfe by the expulsion of such an enemy and by prouideing others to performe the spirituall good hee did, who shall not haue anie intention of miseheife towards mee, for the Law of nature teacheth this, that it is lawfull for eurie man in his owne iust defence, vim vi repellere those that wilbee impudent must bee as impudently dealt w,ball. In case I say that the parte aboue menconed should escape yo' hands by the meanes afore said (woh by all meanes p'uent if possibly you can) then I praie doe not faile to send Mf Copley away from thence by the next shipping to those parts ; vnless hee will bring the other new comes into yo' power to send back againe, and this I am satisfied here that I may for diuers reasons cause to bee done, as the said Mr. Ter ritt and M' Gilmett will more fullie satisfie you and I am resolued to haue it done accordinglie. The princes of Italie who are now vpp in Armes against the Pope (although they bee Romane Catholiques) doe not make anie scruple of Con science by force of Armes to vindicate the Iniurie wob they conceiue hee would haue done vnto the Duke of Parma ; bye wresting a braue Pallace, not farr from Rome called Capreroly w'h a little Territory about it, from the said Duke for one of the Popes Nephewes : nor doe they much esteeme his excom munications or Bulls (both the pope hath made vse off) in that busines for they beleeue them to bee vniustly grounded, and therefore of no validity : although they continue notw'bstand- ing Romane Catholiques, and these are : the Duke of fflorence the state of Venice, the Duke of Parma and the duke of Modena Reggio : who are ioined in league and haue now an Armie of aboue 40000 men raised against the pope, and hee neer as many against them vpon the quarrell aboue menconed, 219 insomuch as it is generallie concerned here that Rome is sacked by this time, or els that the pope hath giuen full satis faction to the aforesaid princes, for hee is thought too weake for them. In fine if you doe not w*b a constant resolution and faithfull affection to mee, executed what I haue here di rected (whatsoeu' inconvenience come off it) and according to what you shall vnderstand to bee my mind herein more per- ticulerlie by word of mouth from the said M' Territt you will as I said betray mee to the greatest dishono' and p'iudice that euer one Brother did another : But you must bee verie carefull that Mf Territt receiue no p'iudice by his communicating my mind to you, or by his zealous affection and fidelity to mee in doeing his best endeauours w'b you to see my desire herein accomplished. Nor Likewise Mf Gilmett w6b I am confident yo' owne iudgm' and discretion will incline you to preuent although I had not menconed it. I vnderstand that notw'bstanding my prohibition the Last yeare you did passe Grants vnder my seale here to those of the Hill of S? Inegoes and other Lands at S' Maryes and also of 100 Acres of land at Pascattoway some of w6b as I am in formed you concerned in iustice due vnto them and therefore thought yo' selfe obliged to grant them although it were con- trarie to my directions w6b to mee seemes verie strange, for certeinly I haue power to reuoke anie authoritie I haue giuen you here either in whole or in part, and if I had thought fitt to haue totally reuoked yo' power of granting anie Lands there at all in my name certeinly no man that is disinterested could thinke that you were bound neuertheless in conscience to vsurpe such an authoritie against my will, because in Justice diuers planters ought to haue grants from mee : for when I haue reuoked the power I gaue you for that purpose anie man els may as well as you vndertake to passe grants in my name, 220 and haue as much obligation also in Conscience to doe it, and how ridiculous that were for anie man to doe I leaue it to you to iudge when I did giue directions to you not to grant anie more Lands to those of the hill there, vpon anie p'tence what- soeuer I did so farr as concern'd them reuoke that power I formerlie gaue you of granting of lands there, and it was a great breach of trust in you to doe the contrarie for I beleeue you would take it verie ill, and wtb good reason you might, if anie man whome you should trust w'!1 the keeping of yo' sealc, should affix it to anie thing contrary to yo' direction although you were bound perhapps in future to cause it to bee done yo' selfe ; if those psons had had anie iust cause of complaint by haueing grants refused them, it had been yo' part onlie to haue referred them vnto me, who knew best my owne reasons why I gaue the aforesaid Directions, for you are but meerly instrumentall in those things to doe what I direct, and not to compel mee to doe what you thinke fitting : And for ought you know some accident might haue hapned here that it was no iniustice in mee to re fuse them grants of anie Land at all, and that by reason of some Act of this state it might haue endangered my life and fortune to haue permitted them to haue had anie grants at all, woh I doe not He assure you mention w'bout good ground. I shall earnestlie therefore desire you to bee more obseruant hereafter of my directions, and not expect that I should satisfie yof iudgm' by acquainting you still w'b my reasons why I direct anie thing : for then my power there were no more then anie mans else, who may w'b reasons perswade you to doe or fbrbeare any thing as well as I. And I doe once more strictly require you not to suffer anie grants of anie Lands for the future to pass my Seale here to anie Member of the Hill there nor to anie other person in trust for them vpon anie p'tence or claime whatsoeuf w'bout 221 especiall Warrant vnder my hand and Seale to bee hereafter obteyned from mee for that purpose. So I rest Yof most affectionate loueing Brother, London 23'.b Nouemb : 1642. I pray commend my kind respects to M'.8 Traughton and thanke her from mee for the letter shee sent mee this yeare in answeare of another w°h I had sent vnto her the yeare before. The Maisters here of those of the Hill there did diuers waies importune mee to pmitt some of theirs to goe this yeare thither, insomuch as they haue God forgiue them for it caused a bitter falling out between my sister Peasely and mee, and some discontentm' also betweene mee and her husband about it, because I would not by anie meanes giue way to the goeing of anie of the aforesaid psons. No. 13. CECILIUS, LORD BALTIMORE, DECLARATION TO THE LORDS. [Superscription.] Cecil The Lo : Baltemores Declaration to the Lords. To the Right Hono"?6 the Lords Comissioners for forreigne Plantations. The humble Declaration ofthe Lord Baltemores proceedings in the procuring & passing of his Pattent of the Province of Maryland adioyning to Virginea, and of seuerall vniust 222 molestations which some of the old dissolued Company of Vir ginea haue giuen him both before & since, to his great preiudice. The Lor Baltemores ffather having disbursed neare 20000 lbs. besides the hazard of his own person in a Plantation in Newfoundland, a countrey proving not habitable for the great colds in winter. And having therevpon transported himself his wife, goods and family to Virginea w'b intent to plant and reside there, where he had been an Adventurer ; did for that purpose leaue his family there; and vpon his arriuall in England became an humble Sutor to his Ma'!6 for that part of Virginea wcb lyeth between the River of Passa- magnus and the p'sent Plantacon of Virginea on James Riuer towards the South. The 20'.h of Feb. 1631. His Ma* referred the consideracon thereof to the right honob!6 the Earlcs of Dorsett & Carlile, the Lo : Viscount Wentworth and the Lo : Cottington, or any three of them : and their said L™8 having well weighed the said request did 23 of Feb. 1631 signifie his Ma'lf8 pleas ure to Mf Attorney Generall that then was, for drawing a Bill conteyning such a Grant to him and his heires, W"h was so done by M' Attorney and his Ma'.y Signed the same. The matter being thus farr proceeded, some of the old dis solued Company of Adventurers to Virginea, seeming discon tented therewith pretending that some of them the next yeare after determined to settle people on the South Side of James Riuer, for the planting of Sugars, it being the most Southerly and best part of all Virginea and no other but that fitt for that purpose, and that this Grant would much p'iudice them in this their designe wob the late Lo : Baltemore conceauing they did really intend, was unwilling to hinder so good a worke or to disgust them or any other as farr as in reason was 223 fitt, though it were to his owne p'iudice, and therefore vpon his humble sute his Ma* tooke the matter againe into consid eracon and made a new reference to the Earles of Arundell & Carlile, the Lo : Viscount Wentworth and Lo : Cottington, who considered not only of the said pretences, but also of the late incroachment of the dutch nation in those parts, who haue planted and fortifyed themselues northward between the old Colony of Virginea, and the English Colonies planted in New England. All w6b being by their said Lo?8 represented to his Ma'? they did (according to his Ma*8 direccons) by a Warrant vnder their hands dated in March following to Mf Attorney Sewall that then was declare his Royall pleasure to be that the said Lo : Baltemore should resigne his former Grant wob was only passed his signature, and haue an other Grant of a tract of Land lying a great way distant northward from the old Colony of Virginea. And accordingly a Bill was prepared, which passed the Priuy Seale, and then before it could passe the great Scale of England, the said Lo : Balte more dyed. After whose death, the now Lo : Baltemore became an hum ble Suto' to his Ma* for the continuance of his said royall favof and his Ma* gaue warrant dated 21. of Aprill next fol lowing to M' Attorney Generall that then was to draw a new Bill for the granting the said Lands to him & his heires, wob passed likewise the Priuy Seale. Then some of the said old dissolucd Company moucd his Ma* for the stay of that Grant also, vpon pretence of prom ises by proclamacon and otherwise from his Ma* (since the dissolucon of the old Pattent of Virginea) for the referring the old Companyes right to all things formerly granted them in that Pattent excepting the Gouernment and for the renew ing of their pattent to that purpose, within the 224 whereof, the Lo : Baltemores Countrey was included : and his Ma* vpon their great importunity againe referred the matter, as they desired, to the late Lo : Treasurer and the Earles of Dorsett & Carlile, who heard both parties and all matters that are now in question before yo' Lo?.8 were then at full heard & considered of, and pticularly that of Capt. Clayborne's p'tences to the Island whereon he is lately planted, was much insisted vpon by Sf John Worstenholme. But it then appear ing to their Lo?8 first that their old Pattent was legally dissolued, not only to the point of Gouernment as they pre tended, but to all other purposes whatsoeuer, and that conse quently the Countrey formerly granted them was wholy in the Kings hands to dispose of, and that those promises wch they pretended from his Ma"8 by his said proclamation and otherwise were not to reserue to the company any incor porate right, or to renew their Corporation (woh his Ma* is so farr from promising therein to doe, in any kind whatsoeuer, as for the reasons therein alleadged, he rather declares his in- tencon then to be directly contrary, but to continue only euery pticuler mans propriety & right to any Plantacon wcb any had settled there, or assignem'." of Land made vnto them during the time of the said Companyes Pattent being in force, when any of them should desire it, as may appeare by the Procla- macon ; and it being also at that tyme made appeare vnto their Lo?8 that although the tract of land then intende'd to the Lo : Baltemore, were within the lymits of the old Companies Pattent, yet that it did not infringe or trench vpon any such plantacon or assignement as aforesaid ; excepting in one part of a Peninsula contayned within the said Grant, wob part of the Peninsula was therefore afterwards excepted out of his Grant : and that Capt : Cleyborne about the time of passing the said Grant wob was many yeares after the dissolucon of the 225 said Companies pattent ; had without any legall authority de- riued from his Ma* ; seated himself in an Island where now he is, within the Bay of Cheasepeack (wob is within the p'cincts of the Lo : Baltemores pattent) and aboue 100 miles northward distant from James Riuer, the p'sent scituacon of the old Colony of Virginea, of purpose to remoue himself farr from all gouernment, being euer obserued to be a man of a factious Spirit, as did appeare by many of his former actions ; their Lo?? therevpon againe made certificate vnder their hands to his Ma* dated 5 of June 1632. that they thought fitt that the said last Grant should passe to the now Lo : Baltemore & his heires, excepting only a great part of the Peninsula aforesaid whereon some of the old Colony had long before planted themselues during the time of the old Com panies pattent being in force, and accordingly a new warrant from his Ma'? dated 7. of June following, was directed to Mf Attorney Generall that then was, to alter his Grant in that point, and to prepare a new Grant of all the rest w'b that excepcon only ; w6b passed the great Seale of England, it being not a fortith part of the Territory belonging to Virginea, as may appeare by the Cards & Mapps of those Countreys, if yof LoP8 please to peruse them. After all w".b the yeare following the Lo : Baltemore having to his great charge made p'paration of Shipps and provisions for the transportacon of people to begin a plantacon in the said Countrey so granted vnto him ; some of the old dissolued Company, a litle before the going forth of the said Shipps, being transported with spleene, (as he conceiues he hath reason to doubt) and of purpose to molest him in his proceed ings, well knowing how p'iudiciall a litle delay would bee vnto him at that time ; againe p'ferred a declaration to yo' LoP8 of the p'tended iniuries done vnto them by the said 29 226 Grant, formerly so much debated & considered of as aforesaid, and hoping at last (as it seemes) to advantage themselues by importunity and multitudes, they brought 30 or 40 of their Company before yo' Lo?? and all matters formerly considered of, concerning that busines, were then againe debated of at large, and pticulerly that of Cleybornes pretences to the Island wherein he is, was againe much insisted vpon, in their declaracon, as by the Copy of it, will appeare : and when they were out of hope of overthrowing the said Grant, then did they moue, that at least they might haue an independent liberty of trade wtb the Indians within his precincts, well knowing the preiudice wob they should do him if they obtained that liberty ; but it then appearing to yof LoP8 as well the weaknes of their former p'tences in other things, as likewise the inius- tice & great inconveniency of this last motion of theirs. ffirst, in that it. was the Lo : Baltimore's right by his pat tent and the only p'sent benefitt, (though small and not likely to be permanent,) that was probable to be made, towarde the defraying of part of the great charge of the Plantacon, and therefore neither1 in Justice nor equity fitt that any others who did not contribute to the planting of the Countrey should de- priue him of it : Secondly in that it was very inconvenient & dangerous for him and his plantacon to pmitt it, because thereby he should giue those who were not well asserted to his plantacon, and whom he had noe power to regulate a meanes to spoile the markett of that Trade, as likewise to pick quarrells, and doe iniuries to those Indians who were Neighbo™ to his plantacon, and who would be apt to revenge vpon his Planters all such wrongs done them, when those who did them were gone, the Indians making no difference between them being all of one Nation ; Yof LoP8 therevpon thought fitt by an Order at the 227 Starr chamber 3 of July 1633 to dismisse the busines, and to leaue the Lo : Baltemore to the right of his Pattent. All w6h just and faire proceedings in the passing of w°.b pat tent ought to haue been sufficient (as is humbly concerned) to debarr any man from any further importunity in opposing his Ma'.8 gracious Act vnder the great Seale of England, so ad visedly & considerately done, especially there having been really no such promises made by his Royall Proelamaeon aforesaid, as could any way either in hono' or otherwise oblige him to forbeare to make such a Grant vnto the Lo : Balte more : — But only were and are suggested by them either meerely to p'iudice and molest his good endeavo'.8 for the en- largment of his Ma*" Empire in those parts ; or for some other ends besides planting ; ffor if their intentions in this their importunity to haue their Corporation renewed, were and are meerely to haue power thereby to plant, any of them hath might and may yet, without pressing for any such thing, haue Land enough assigned them for that purpose, from his Ma'.8 Gouerno' and Councell in Virginea, as many others, both old and new Plant™ and Adventurers, from time to time, since the dissolucon of the old Company haue had, and dayly haue, and vpon as good conditions as any perticular person of them either had or could haue had, when they were in an incorporated Body ; there being more Land vnplanted and vndisposed of then them these many yeares, and such land as is more Southerly and better then that woh is granted to the Lo : Baltemore, w6b pticuler assigne- m18 also, his Ma* no doubt, would afterwards be pleased to confirme vnto any of them as they should reasonably desire, and as he was graciously pleased to promise, by his said Procla- con, to those who had any plantacon seated or any assigne- ment of Land there, during the time of the old Corporation. 228 But none of those, who haue so much troubled his Ma'f and yo' Lo?8 in this busines, haue any Plantacon or people setled in Virginea, neither haue any of them begun any plantacon for sugars on the South parts of Virginea, as some of them vpon the late Lo : Baltemore's first Grant of that part, aboue menconed (wcb is now 3 yeares since) p'tended very earnestly to doe, or done any thing els since, concerning the plantacon of Virginea, but importuned his Ma* and yo' Lo?8 for the re newing of their Corporacon, and raysed trouble both here and there ag? the Lo : Baltemore and his Plantation. Now for as , much as the said Grant was made vpon such mature deliberation vpon so many seuerall references, war rants and certificates (the Copies whereof are ready to be p'sented vnto yo' Lo?8) And for asmuch as the said Lo : Baltemore hath therevpon disbursed by himself and his freinds aboue tenn thousand pounds for the setling of a Col ony of his Ma?8 Subiects in the said Countrey, having sent two of his Brothers thither (one of whom he hath since lost vpon the place) and having seated already aboue two hundred people there. Hee humbly beseecheth yo' LoP8 to the end he may be no further vniustly molested by any of the old dis- solued Company of Virginea, but may peaceably & quietly enioy his Ma'.8 gracious Grant vnto him, and the right, w6b he (in confidence thereof) hath since so deerly bought by the ex- pence of so great sumes of money, the loss of one of his Brothers and severall others of his freinds, and many other troubles wob he hath since vndergone, in the prosecution of it, That yo' LoP8 would be pleased vpon these considerations ; To make a finall Order that the old dissolued Company of Vir ginea shall be heard no more in their said vniust p'tences against his Pattent, because the often questioning of his right, though it be vpon vniust grounds, doth much p'iudice him in 229 his proceedings, Nor that any other order do passe from this Honob!6 Boord w6b may p'iudice his right or cause any suites in Law between them, ffor that would much endanger the ouerthrow of his Plantation which is now in a good forward- nes to perfection, and consequently his and many of his freinds vtter ruine, in respect that the greatest part of their fortunes are there vpon engaged. No. 14. GOVERNOR CHARLES CALVERT TO CECILIUS, LORD BALTIMORE. [Indorsement.] [Superscription.] Seal. Calvert Arms with A LABEL. 27 Aprill 1664 My son Charles to me by Cap : Miles Cooke. For The Right Honb?6 The Lord Baltemore These p'snt p Capt. Cooke. May it Please Your Lopp — I shall now endeauour to giue yf LoPp an Accompt of what I haue done as to yf Lo?!8 Comands in the last & This yeares letters but I shall first humbly begg yf LopP8 pardon that I haue nott done it sooner : 27th May 1662. Your Lo™ was pleas'd in that letter to comand me to procure some Elke Calues two Males and two FemaUs, I haue vsed all my endeauours possible but can 230 procure none as yet, yf Lopp in that letter was pleas'd to write about the Manu' of Calverton, to know what has beene granted out of it, A Thousand Acres y' Lopp did grant to doctor Barber & 300 acres att an other time, & Mf Pyles has had a 1000 acres more out of it vpon a letter w°.b Mf Lewger writt long since as from yf Lo™ wob is all I know of or can learne from any ; I haue acquainted the Masters of Vessells that what letters I send to y' Lo™ they should carry for Lon don & nott send them by the post as they were wont to doe & that y' Lo™ would beare them out in't, the 20 Barrells of Corne w6h Mf Sewall was to haue he has now payd him by discount w'b the Chancell', & the 20lb wob my vncle had of yr L°™ in Maryland money he tells me is pay'd as may appeare by his neate Accompt of 1661. I haue according to yf Lo™8 Grant to my Cosen Darnall of Jenkins Plantacon endeauourd to sell it for him, & hope by these ships to send him Bills of Exchange for't ; M' Sewall has Great Eltonhead as y' L°pp gaue me Ord' in this letter. 24')' July 1662. According to yf Lopps Comands in this letter I passt the land aforesd to the Secretary, & he has sur rendered his warrant for 2000 acres wcb yf Lopp was please to bestow on him : 26th July 1662. I humbly returne y' Lopp many thanks for the 25 p pole woh the Countrey gaue by Act of Assembly, I shall endeauour to make the best vse I can for your Lopps seruice : As to what your Lopp writes about the Hattons whoe would faine haue a 1000 acres of the Land att Choptico pretending a promisse from your Lopp wob as I find vpon record was but Conditionall, soe that I shall obey yf Lopps Coinands & endeauours to satisfie them in some other place, when soever they shall desire it but as yett I heare nothing from them. The Grant woh y' L°™ gaue to Doctor Barber he 231 shewd me vpon w6b I pass't & sing'd him a pattent, afore y' Lopps letter came to my hands, & whereas y' L°™ does think that grant was reuokt', I enquir'd of the Chancell' about it whoe could say nothing to't as he told me, soe that I cannot find any thing whereby to recall what's pass't he shewing me yf Lopp letter vpon wch I did it & causd the words of yf L°™8 letter to be recorded woh concern'd his buisinesse, Mf Lewgers sonne has that Plantation of Coles in lieu of 500 acres w°? yf Lopp had giuen him, there were noe housing vpon't, soe that there was noe Tob. to be demanded vpon that accompt of him ; As to what yof Lopp : was pleasd to write about the moneys or Tobaccos due from Mf Sewall to M' Lewger & Ccecill Langford I can onely say This that the fees of the Secretarys place are much more then formerly & conceiue it will not preiudice the Secretary to pay part if not the whole, but shall desire yf Lopps positiue Ordf therein for what's due in arreares, & for the future Ccecill Langford being now gone from yf L°™ the Secretary I think may very well pay Mf Lewgers share yearely. 15th Sep : 1661. I did according to yf Lopps Comands take Peeter Gures from the Chancellf but since that he's returnd to him againe but vpon better termes then afore. 24'.b Sep. 1661 Your Lopp in This letter was pleas'd to write about Mf W? Eltonheads will, whoe by word of mouth gaue his land & other estat to his wife he being att that time a prisoner & could not haue the benifitt of paper & Ink vpon w6b the Court then Judgd the will good, but in regard the word heyres was not spoken I am not certaine whether our last Act of Assembly for quietting possessions does not confirmd it as to her as it was intended for all such as had but imperfect Conueyances wcb makes me att p'sent able to say little but shall endeauour to enquire more into't, in regard wee 232 had occasion att our last Prouinciall Court to examine that busines & I find the wittnesse that was to haue prou'd that will was not entred vpon record, wob will alter the thing much, & if Mf Eltonhead will make a letter of Attourney to some person here to sue for his right, I shall endeavour that Iustice be done in't, but if he send a letter of Attourney he must gett it Attested according to Act of Assembly as y' L°pp will see by the Acts sent home this yeare or otherwise it will not be of force here w'b vs ; I giue y' L°pp many Thanks for the Grafts sent by Mr White last yeare but none of them came to good ; I haue & shall obserue y' Lopps Comands in euery particular in these letters of 1662, These last of 1663 I shall now giue yf L°™ the Best Accompt I ame able in answer to euery thing therein. 23'." July 1663. I shall according to yf Lo™8 Comands take care for the future whoes Bills I take, & as to that of M' Loyds about the 26'b he assur'd me in the Presence of the Chancell' that he had taken such effectuall Course w'b his correspondent in England that I press't him nott to draw any Bills, but it shall make me more Carefull the next time; Smiths Bill wob y' L°™ return'd protested came to my hands, but in regard Smith is gone for England whoe sign'd it, noth ing can be done in't here but must leave it to y' L°pp in England where he is or will be some time or other his Father is one of that Company vpon whom he drew those Bills of Exchange & y' Lopp will come to heare of the sonne vpon the Exchange, The 9 hli*8 of Tobacco wob in 1662 I sent whome to y' L°™ by Capt Tully, 7 of wob I thought good & weighty, but as y' Lopp writes were nott, must be Capt Tullys fault, for it was himselfe that assur'd me that 4 of the 7 w6h he brought from Ann Arundell were extraordinary good Tob : & good weight 400 & vpwards all foure, for the other 233 Three, I was w'b him when they were brought on board his Ship & I caus'd eueiy hdd to be opend & shew'd him the To baccos wob he like't then very weU, & wisht all the Tob : he had then on board were as good I saw them weighed & euery hogshead was vpwards of 400 this I can Assure yf Lopp to be truth soe that where the fault was vnlesse Capt. Tully was Careless or did not deale soe fairely >v'h yf L°™ as he ought to haue done 1 can't Imagine, for I tooke all the care possible 1 could that y' L°™ mought not pay freight for bad Tobaccos ; The Bills of Exchange woh your L°™ receiued from Coll Smith charg'd by me I will take care shall be payd againe & thought to haue sent in this yeare, But doctf Tilghman putts me of still alleadging his bad condition he is in, but say's he will not faile to contriue paym? next Cropp,w6h I shall returne to yr L°™, But This will make for the future take care for whome I doe such a courtesey for it was purely to pleasur the doctf he being a stranger att that time in Virginia w6b made me request the fauour of Coll Smith to procure him Creditt for soe much in Virginia wob accordingly vpon my letter he did, & to satisfie him I was forct to draw a Bill for the moneys vpon y' L°™ the Doct' taking noe care to satisfie the debt, As Concerning what yf L°™ writes that the Comiss'.8 w6h I sent did not well to consent that the same time for the stinting to be alike in both places, to w6b it was answered to me that they could not accomodate it otherwise the Other party alleadging that that would not be soe greate a preiudice in regard Maryland was not much to the Northward of Vir ginia, & as to the Calling our Assembly here first was a great ouer sight in them, & they could giue me noe good answer to't, onely that it was much press't by the other party the re sult of our Assembly as to that businesse I sent y' Lopp in Harwood & Copys in Groome; I was not long since att 30 234 Virginia to waite vpon the Gouern' & amongst other buisnesse wth him I mou'd the setting forth the diuisionall line from Wattkins point to the seabord syde to wcb he seem'd very willing, & some time in Aprill was then appointed for't, & since that I received a letter from Scarburgh wherein he gaue me to vnd'stand that he had Order from the Gouer' Councell & Comittee of theire Assembly to write to me that vpon the 10th of May next was the time appointed by 'm for the doing that buisnesse to w°h I answer'd I should nott faile to send others to meet them on y* Lo™8 behalfe, w6h I am now preparing to doe & shall carefully obserue your L°™8 Comands & Instructions in that buisness, & I hope I may be able to giue yf Lopp an Accompt by some of the last shipps that de part from hence or Virginia of the accomodating that differ ence betwext the Virginians & vs, In answer to what y' Lopp writes about the Mann' of Great Eltonhead, vpon inquiry since into that buisnesse doe find that there is 5000 acres according to former suruey, & how Mf Sewall came to find there was but 3000 I shall not venture to say att p'sent, but it goes now for the full quantity as afore & nothing is sd more concerning it by the Secretary ; I receiued a letter from the Lords of the Councell but as yf L°™. Comandcd me haue taken noe notice oft att all, but shall notw'.hstanding be very diligent in obseruing theire Comands, & I humbly begg yf Lopps pardon for my Omission in not sending the last yeares bonds for 1662 till this last shipping, but shall for the future amend that fault, I sent them by Groome & duplicats by Harwood or Tully I dont well remembf w°.b The Orig- inalls I keepe here, those of 1663 I now send by Cap' Cooke & Copys likewise by Tilghman. My last yeares Accompt I sent by Groome w'.b Jack Allen, but am afraid I shall not be able to send yf Lopp This of 1663 untill the next shipping for 235 the sheriffs are soe long afore they returne me theire Bookes that I haue not time to make vp the Accompts the same ship ping to send y' Lopp, woh I hope will excuse me, but I shall notwthstanding endeauour what in me lyes to hasten them, In answer to what y' Lopp was pleasd to write about the 68 hhds of Tob : woh I sent last yeare in Fon for my not sending the weights of euery hdd was not soe much my fault for the Sheriffs came not downe time enough w'h theire notes of par ticular & the ship was gone afore I had them woh was the cause I sent them not, otherwise I should nott haue Comitted such an ouersight as that was : The Gouer' of New Amstell is re turned to Delaware but I vnd'stand as yett nothing from him, neither doe wee heare any thing more of the frigatts that were design'd for the Manados, if at any time there be occaticon for our assistance to Call the Dutch to an Accompt for the Land they enioy there wee shall be ready & endeauour to putt in for yf Lopps. Right wob att p'sent wee conceiue better to lett alone vnlesse yf Lopp can informe vs w6h way wee can safely do't, & wee shall be still ready to Obey Comands. I spoak to the Chancellf touching y' Accompts w°b he sent to y' Lopp to w6h he answered that he had sent yf Lopp his answer to such Obiections as were made & gaue me a Copy oft wob I shall peruse & giue y' Lopp my sence thereof but they are soe tedious that att p'sent I am not able to spend soe much time to examine them neither is he at leasure my sicknesse whilst I was in Virginia & the time it Continued on me after my re turne into these parts has hindred me extreamly & putt me back in all my buisnesse, but I will examine all those ac compts & returne y* Lopp his answer to me as to euery par ticular : I pay'd him his Thirds last yeare as yf Lopp will find by the Accompt currant woh I sent in Groome ; I brought him debtor 70 odds lbs for Arreares of Rents wch I found by 236 the books returnd me in 1662 w°b his seuerall deputys had re- ceiued & had given noe Creditt ever vpon the Bookes formerly of his w°h sume I charg'd him w'b & he to gett it of his deputys w°" I suppose he has ere this. 24th July 1663. I receiued y' Lopps as p Margent by Mf Allen & according to yr Lopps Comands therein haue shewne him all the kindnesse possibly I could, he's a very good Condicond young man, & In time may done well as to the vnd'standing our Comodity & manner of dealing in these parts of the world, w°b att This time I confesse can giue little encouragem' to any, I receiu'd the Mault & flower from Groome & humbly & returne yf Lopp many Thanks for them & for the news books wch are a great divertisment to vs here, I haue acquainted my Couzen W™ Caluert about that buis nesse betwixt him & my vncle, & shall endeauour what I can for the best. 26th July 1663. This I receiu'd by the hands of df Hum- berstone & in Obedience to yf Lo?£8 Comands receiu'd him into my house whilst he stay'd here, but I cannot find him to be the person capable of jierforming those things y' Lopp was in- form'd of him he's an Indiffrent good Chirurgeon & as in- diffrent in his religion, he past here for an Athest, & I think him little better, some call'd him the Heathen doctor & I pre sume none could call him a miss, but I was Civill to him in regard it was y' Lopps pleasure & Comands to me. I shall speake to Augustine as yf Lopp formerly writt about a par ticular Mapp for S! Johns & West St Marys, Mf White has done some thing as to the House & Orchard of S' Johns wcb I presume he'll send yf Lopp this shipping. 3d August 1663. I receiu'd this letter & a letter from yf Lopp for Coll' Fontele Roy & a warrant for him, both wob I carried wth me to Virginia, but afore I could gett it sent 237 to him he was dead, soe that I haue the warrant & shall keepe it vntill yf Lopp shall further direct in't, 1 returne yf Lopp many thanks for the moneys payd to Mf Fitzherbert in England wob I chargd vpon yf Lopp. 14'h August 1663. In answer to what yf Lopp was pleas'd to write in this letter I shall now endeauour to satisfie as to euery particular the best I can; In that letter I receiued seuerall papers from yf Lopp & a note of the prizes of such things sent in Capt Tully. The Things themselfes I receiued & a Man seruant, the other that was to haue come being putt a shoare att Plimouth, I had alsoe by that vessell Copys of y' Lopps Comission & Instructions to Capt Swanley Gone'' of Newfounland, all w6h I shall peruse & returne an answer as soone as I can for yf Lopps satisfaction ; The bus- ness w6b the slones Complain's & writt about is by me accom odated betwext them & the Chancellf he paying the Arrears of Rent due from them, & he to haue what was in his hands of shares, by wob meanes he came to gett 10 or 1281 by the bar- gaine & gave discharges to each other afore me, & soe that that difference was ended ; the arreares of Rent comes to 38 odd pounds w6b I am to charge to the Chancellf8 accompt this yeare, towards paym' of his Thirds as Sallary from yf Lopp : The Proclamacon w°.h yf Lopp was pleasd to mention was issued forth by me & the Rest of the Councell concerning the taking of Hydes for Rent, nothing as yett is done in't, in re gard M' Jackson could not give that security to me wch in Reason I ought to haue demanded of him for the securing yf Lopp of yf Rents & besides one reason wob made me doe nothing in't was because the Councell had nothing to doe w"1 things of that nature w6b afterwards I reflected on though at the Issuing forth of that Proclamaco I was surprised but it signified nothing ; Though many times when I have spoken 238 by the by to the Chancell' of the difficulty I had in getting the Rents cleare euery yeare, he has often press't me to aduise w'.b the Councell w'b it, but I haue made him still this answer that I concciu'd it not a buisnesse properly belonging to them, but that I should vse what means w'h his aduise I thought best, w6b since I haue vnd'stood he has informd the Councell as he has of many other things w6h in priuate I have discours't w'.b him : I haue endeavour'd to assist Mr Jackson what I can in letting him a spott of ground hard by me for his Tann Fatts & lent him a House to putt his Bark in euer since he came, but I find the Countrey are not soe ready to encourage him as I thought they would in regard they see noe great effects of his coming in ; The reason I did nott last yeare send y' Lopp an accompt of the Things sent that yeare & that I did nott answer the letters of that yeare was because Spenser was gone sooner then I heard he was to goe, but I sent by the way of New England but cannot vnd'stand that y' Lopp received the letters. The Things that yf Lopp sent this yeare I shall now giue an accompt to euery particular as I receiud them ; The Warrant wch yf Lopp mentions Mf Lewger has for me as Receiuer came to me, & I liaue giuen Capt Tully lO" to pay him it being for the first paym? & shall not faile to pay as much yearely till 7 yeares be expired as long as I continue Receiuer ; I haue spoke to the Chancell' concerning what he writt to y' Lopp of a promisse I made to Patrick Powest of the land att Pork Hall neck, wob I wonder extreamly att, when he knows, I neuer did nor could I if I would, & to lett y' Lopp see he has done me a great deale of wrong in't, the busnesse was this, he himselfe came to me & spoake in this fellows behalfe to me for that land, To w°.h I answered him : S' you know it lyes not in my power to dispose of any lands Escheated to his Lopp wth out particular 239 Ord' for't, & as yett I haue none the second time he came againe, & I made him the very same answer as afore I had done, but Patrick as he says presst him soe much that he came the Third time w'.b him at woh I was a little troubled & desird the Chancellf he would satisfie him, but nothing would serue it seemes vnlosse I gave the fellow an answer & vpon that I went out of my parlor to the fellow, & the same buisnesse was mou'd by the fellow, & the same answer I gaue him as I had to the Chanf then Patrick desir'd me to write to yf Lopp to procure it him, I then demanded of the Chancell' whither himselfe & Dick Willan whoe was then liuing were willing to't in regard I knew both theire stocks of Cattle & hogs ran in that neck, the Chancellr made me answer he was very will ing & more over did assure me of Mr Willan Willingnesse to't to wch I reply 'd if it be true as yu are pleas'd to say I'll write to his Lopp about it, but w'h in a Day or two after I pass't by Mf Willans House & mett w'h him whoe desir'd to know of me whether Patrick had obtained a grant of Pork hall neck, & vpon that I acquainted him w'h what I have here related to y' Lopp, wherevpon he made me answer that if any body did seate that land it would mine him in his stock, I iiuediatly went to the Chan1!' & sent for Patrick to come thither to mc,& told them both what M' Willan had said, to w6'1 the Chancell' told me priuatly that Willan was a strange man, but My lord the reason of that was there had beene some little difference betwixt my Vncle & him about some Corne Willan had lett him & could not gett it againe, I told Patrick I would doe nothing that should ruine a. person that had beene soe faithfull as dick Willan had beene to yf Lopp well then sd the Chan' doe not Sr at least hinder him by writing to y' L°™, I assurd him I would neither write for the one or the other & this is the buisnesse 240 in short wob I humbly leave to yf Lopp to iudge whether This were a promisse I could acquaint yf Lopp wth many other Triuiall Things w6h he has reported of me but are nott worth troubling yf Lopp wth all att p'sent. T give yf Lopp many Thanks for the Things sent by Capt. Tully, I receiued them all & the Inuoyce and as they were sett downe both in that & the Bills of lading I shall be very carefull as well of what y' Lopp has last sent me as likewise of the things I had afore : The reason 1 haue nott giuen yf Lopp soe large an accompt of euery particular from time to time was for want of a Clerk I haue now hired one for a time, & shall for the future giue yf Lopp better satisfaction ; but for sending the Escheats, Michas I receiue the Rents I will if possible I anie able & can gett my Bookes in time enough ; If T had nothing else to doe but to goe to the Respective sheriff of euery County for theire seuerall books I'ts very possible I hi ought do't, but haning continually more buisnesse then I can well runn Thorough, I must neglect one thing or other if I should stir soc much from home 1 did desire as y' Lopp writes to haue some frieght taking last yeare in England, but fearing afterwards If I should not compleat my freight, I should be protested against, I chose rather to lctt it alone & that was the reason I did not send word as I writt I would otherwise have done. I haue acquainted the Secretary that the Chancell' had writt yf Lopp word of some indiscreet & vnhandsome speeches he should vtter & that the Chancell' had informd y' Lopp he had acquainted me w'1' it, but I assure yf Lopp I can't remeinb' that over I heard any word or tittle oft afore I read y' Lopps letter for if I had I should have hardly past it in silence soe I iihediatly went to the Chancell1 to know of him whoe Those persons were that would be Mr Sewalls accusers he told me M' Coursey was the person, 241 where vpon I sumonds him to S' Marys & made knownc the businesse to him to woh he made answer that he had heard seuerell things come from the Secretary, I desird that he would give me vnd' his hand what he had to say & lay to his charge wcb I heare send to yr Lopps being able to say little to't my selfe the one declaring vpon Oath & the Other posi- tiuely denying vpon Oath. M' Coursey moreouer told me that others had heard as much as himselfe, I demanded whoe those were & he told me the Chancell' had heard the same & to tho same effect as what he could say, whervpon I spoake to the Chancellf whoe told me likewise that he had att an other time heard to the same purpose as Mf Coursey, I sent you some time since for my Brother Lowe to supply, I also sent Bills of Exc. to Mf Barnaby Dunck & desired his eye over my Children to see if all things were complyed with by Nick LoAve : herewith I send you an ace' of what Bills of Exc. and other moneys I orderd into my Brother Lowes hands, there to lye for supply ing all occationes in relation to my Children and my other Concernes ; so that I suppose I did all that was needful! . Just now comes the Mate of one Capt Canham, and brings me Ires from severall persons ; Avith the mate came one Mf Jesfrie Fleetwood avIio likewise has deliver'd me severall lies from yf selfe my Cosen Mary darnall and other persons; the dates of yf that came by the mate & Fleetwood are as followeth, 4?h of Jan? 6?h of Feb. 7th 11th 17. & 30* of March, being six in all, by these Ires I am sufficiently made sensible how kind and carefull you haue been of my Children & Con cernes and do assure you it is a great satisfaction to me and my wife to vnd'stand by all Ires from you and our other freinds that our Children were well and such care taken of them as doth sufficiently satisfie vs & th' they will not want any thing requisit for them to haue. I will now giue some short answer to these last Ires I recd from you, the Comandr of the York Merch' Capt Christoph' Evelin being ready for sailing, I received the Ires and other things you sent by Roddy, Partis, & Groome wcb you make mentione in yf of the 4tb of Januf I haue received Mf Black- tliAvates Ires wob you mention in y'8 of the 6th of Feb.f and am glad M' Wyse was well and that severall persons besides D. Arthur was out vpon Baile — Yf Ire of the 7th of March 307 maketh mention that Arthur had recd Covell's Bill, as for my note due to Bar. dunck I haue orderd him paym' out of the Bill of Exc! for the Charles Walter dunch Comand' it is good newes to me that y° appear'd vpon the Exchange, and I hope God will protect you and all that are innocent from the malice of wicked persons, my wife and I am very very well satisfied that my Cosen darnall will trouble her selfe in seeing neces- sarys bought for my Children, and assist you in that affaire, you did well to pay y' respects to S.f Clement Armiger, As for the Buttler's Annuity it must be pd out of the Yorkeshyre estate, for though I orderd my Sister fiue hundred pounds out of that Estate, yet with this reserue that those should be allowed out of it likewise, and so much you must acquaint Mf Alliband and my vncle Weld. As to your concerne and that of M'8 Rawlins I will drawne on Mf Barnaby dunch for you both ; and am resolved to giue Order to my new Attor neys to lett my howse, for since persons of the Romish per- swasion are not to be permitted to be in Lend? it will not be convenient for me to keepe that howse any longer. My Bro ther Henry Lowe hath not Avritc though you mention that he was in Towne. by y' Ire of the 11th of March I vnd'stand that there has been greate trouble about a Gowne for my wifes daughter Jenny ; and that you were Blam'd by some of my wifes Relatives, but I shall take care to cleere you in that or any thing else they may take vnkindly from you. My wife and I think as you do about the Aveaning of our son Benedict Leo. and that till he haue some teeth it will not be safe, but if the nurse should prone with Child, then our son ought to be wean'd out of hand, and I find you haue taken care it shall be don in such case, wch Avas well thought of and I thank you kindly for the charge you gaue the nurse therein. You signifie that my Irish rent has not been paid but I hope care will be 308 taken by my Attorneys in it when it may be convenient to sue Morris & Cleyborn for it. As to Jn? the Coachman he must be dismist & ought to haue been vpon his quitting my son's services, order shall be given to my Brother Low to pay him of his wages. I am glad to vnd'stand that M'8 Bayard her sister Dell Joynes & her husband haue been carefull of all matters comitted to theire charge w6h I will take care to requite them for, wch y' lfe of the 11th of March I reced a copy of an ace' wob you Avrite, my Cosen Copley gaue you ; amounting to 801 : 10": 05D as you made it, my Brother Nick Ioav I hope hast satisfied it according to my order to him In your Ire of the 17th of March I find that my Avifes Brothers had caused 101 or 121 pounds to be layd out in cloths for the Children without acquainting any of my Attorneys but i suppose for the future there will be a better vnderstanding amongst those 1 hane imploycd to assist you in the care of my Children both I and my wife supposeing there was no such greate cause of complaint as was pretended. T will in my Ires to my Brother Nick Lowe excuse your not letting of him know where my son Cis was lodged ; As to the barrell of Tob : you mentioned brought by Groome I freely bestow it on you to make Avhat you can of it. I am somewhat troubled to understand that my Cosen Smithson had pd but one hundred pounds to my Sister out of my York shire rentt and that as he writt word there would be so much money layd out in building a mannor howse att Danby & in repaireing some other Tenants howses there which will be lost to me if I should be cast by S.f Wf Blackston Your last Ire being the 30tb of March giues me the Avelcome news of my Childrens healths and particularly of little Cis and was glad to see the lfe he writt to you the lie being not dated, but as you conceiue was to haue borne date the 25th of March, I am 309 uery glad to vnderstand that Mr Wysc is well and that you hope he will continue so and that he has receiued moneys for the Tob : I left in his hands I am glad you acquainted Mf Wyse of the part I hold in the Cecelius and by that meanes caused a stop to be made of any paym! for fraight which you signifie was demanded of Mf Wysc. As to the Ladies eon- ccrne I will take care it shall be made good to her. You signifie that my lies by the Lowe were not come to your hands which I Avonder much att, for by Cap? Oswould Wheately I sent a packett vnder couer to Mf Daniell Arthur, which I de sired the master to deliuer to Mf George Cornish, Avho I vndcrstood was to nicete hiin att the Isle of Wight, but if Mf Cornish came not there I then suppose the master might deliuer my packett of Ires to a passenger that went in his ship, who had beene boatsAvainc of the Charles, when I came ouer, and if that person had them I hope he would be carefull to deliuer them. I am glad my vncle Wild came of'Avell before the Lords, but am sorry he is not one of the new parliamf I vnderstand Collf Spencer is Secretary of Virg^- and about four or fiue dayes since did congratulate him the new honour he had thereby receiu? from his Ma".6; this being all att prsent I haue leisure to Avrite only to a?sure you that by all opportunities you shall heare from me, and the same 1 de sire from you, and that you will likewise mind my Attorneys (viz) Mf. Nicholas Lowe Mr Thomas Gilbert and Mf Barnaby Dunck to write by euery shipp and that you giue them notice when any shipp shall be ready to sayle and so I rest p Capt. Evelin Your uery loueing friend 9th July 1679. C B. Bills of Exai on Barnaby Dunck payable to Rich? Burk or ordf for forty pounds sterling, being for his Avages & Annuity — 310 Maryland 10'? Jully 1679. Cosen Darnall T haue now to giue you thanks for your seuerall letters of these following dates viz 2d January 6th feb. & 16'.? ditto 3d march 7th & 26th ditto by these letters you haue taken a great deale of trouble and paines in letting me know in what Condition my Children were in vnderstanding from others as well as from your letters your great kindnesse toAvards them for Avhich my wife and I returne you hearty thanks begging the Continuance of your Care and kindnesse towards them and that you'l please to write by all oportunities to vs as you haue donn I was very sorry to vnderstand of my Cosen your husbands Indisposition as Likewise for the great trouble he finds at present there I shall heerwith send hiin a supply of moneys as alsoe a small tocken of my kindnesse to your selfe which Tie desire you will accept of from Your affecf Kinsman Deere Coosen C. B. To Mrs Mary Darnall at the Lady Summersetts house neare heme Stile In London p Capt" Eueling 10th July 1679 Bills of Exc? on Mr Barnaby Dunck to pay vnto Mf Phil lip darnall the sume of tAventy pounds sterling and to take receipt for the sd sume ; first & second. 10th July 1679. Bills on ditto payable to Mf Mary Darnall for Tenn pounds ster! first & second Bill, one p Evelin, other p Sheppard. 311 Maryland Jully 10th 1679 Deere Sister I have received yours by Mf fleetwood and for your sake I shall shew him what kindnesse lies in my power I writt to you by Capt? Oswold Wheatley but doe not vnderstand you haue received that letter therin I gaue you an accompt of our ariuall and well being I was once resolued to haue seene you this summer but the death of Mr Notley hath Caused such an alteration in affaires with me that I Canot possibly quitt the prouince this shipping which is noe small trouble to me this with my humble seruice to aunt Summersett is all I will trouble you with and therfore Conclude as I am Your most aff'ec? Bro. Deere Sister C. B. To Madam Elizabeth Caluert In London p Capt? Eveling Maryland Jully 10th 1679. Mr Allibond I haue received yours of the 10th feb. by Mf fleetwood and was glad to vnderstand by him that you and your wife were well and at your house in London I had not received any from you vntill this by mf fleetwood you may be asshured I shall show the Gentleman what kindness I Can and wherin Else I Can serue you You shall find me — Your most aff. freind C. B. To Mr Richard Allibond In London. 312 Maryland Jully 10?? 1679. Good Brother I Avill now acknowledge the receipt as alsoe giue you thanks for those letters I haue reced from you the last to which I haue not as yet giuen you an answere are of the dates foUoAving 22* feb. 25* March the first of these you mention to haue sent me seuerall letters but I haue recevd but one more besides these I haue already mentioned ; I am glad to vnderstand you are soe well discharged from your old ac quaintance and knaue Bellamy your other letter of the 25* of March mentiones that you had writt at large to me by the same Conueyance that it Came by, but I haue not receiued any such letter as yet you acknowledge the recept of mine of the 15* fob. by a Lime Vessell and giue me to vnderstand that you had suplied my Children with some necessaries afore that request of mine came to your hands for w6b both I and my wife most kindly tlianke you and alsoe for what you wrote Concerning Mf Arthur bailing some time since sent directions for the drawing out what moneys I had in his hands As to your Concerne in your Brother Vins hands I bane don n what I durst doe betwixt two brothers and at last banc procured for you twenty six hoxeds of tobacco as by the Inclosed accompt you will perceiue but I was Con tented to be disappointed my selfe rather then you should be any longer without some returns from him and of this you will be satisfied by the Inclosed letter which I received from him with the noties for the twenty six hoxeds ; more I will Endeuor to procure for you the next shiping for you may be assured I will be your faithfull solicitor herein, now Brother as to the Effects I haue already Consigned vnto you being as followeth, first with my letter of the 5* March I sent you bills of Exi amounting to the summ of 2811.. 38.. 0d. further in 313 my letter to you of the 25* Aprill I sent you two bills of Exl of Boddys & Ellys for the summ of 1661.. 38.. 4d. all which I hope will come safe to your hands, I alsoe sent you an order for Mf Wise and Lombard to pay you the produce of the tobacos left in theire hands, and alsoe the Interest of what Cash I left with them being 200018 for which there was 5' p Cent to be paid me, I shall renew those orders and send them againe with this hauing lately vnderstood that the said Wise & Lombard haue sold the tobaccos to Mf William Drope. I Likewise am aduised that John the Coachman who waited on my son was sometime since dismissed from my sons seruice and that notwithstanding his wages ran on still, therefore vpon your recept lieerof I desire and alsoe order you to pay him of his said wages which by agreement was 61 for the whole yeare, heerin pray faile not. I haue thought fitt and presumd to Constitute you my Cosen Thomas Gilbert Mr Barnaby Dunck and my seruant Richard Burk my attorneys to act for me in Case of any law of suites or other businesse Av6b may happen before I see you, by vertue of which letter of Attorney I must desire you with any two or three of my attorneys to see my house lett that I haue in Southhampton building for as much as you can gett and when any Tenant presents to take Care that an accompt be had of all my things and a note of them all .be taken by you & Rich? Burk, and the goods ancl things lodged in some place where you Mf Dunck & Ric? Burk shall think fitt, so they be carefully secured, herein Good Brother pray faile not, and in particular to take Speciali care of my Trunck in my dressing Roome in wob are my deeds & writings for all my Estate in Engl? Ireland & Else where, this and' the Care of my Children and that I may heare often from you is all I will desire and trouble you with at 40 314 this time Avith my very kind respects to my Sister I remaine i Deere Brother Your affec? frend & Seru? To Mr Nicholas Lowe C. B. merchant in Philpot Lane In London p Capt? Eueling post script Brother Vpon the remouall of the goods and other things in my house aboue Specified my wife your Sister earnestly entreats you that great Care may be taken of a great trunck w6b stands in her Chamber betwixt the bedd and the Chimney there being in it seuerall bottles of Cordiall Waters and Likewise some flent glasses which Avill all be broke if not with great Care Carried away ; it is alsoe requested that as much Care be taken in the remouing my wifes best Chest of drawers and that an Exact accompt be taken of the things in them and lastly that my Scritoire in my dressing roome be Carefully remoued alsoe which is all at this time from Your Lo : Bro in Law p Capt? Eueling I send y" herewith a Bill of \ Exc! for Cap' Evelin's dutys drawne t 501: 16": 04* 14 July 1679 on Tho. Griffith for the sume of i on Bro. N. Lowe in fauour Yours, of Mf Rawlins for fiue pounds sterling C. B. Maryland Jully 15* 1679 Mf Byard. I am informed by my wife of your great Care and kind nesse vnto my Children for which I kindly tlianke you I alsoe 315 am aduised that you haue layd out in necessaries for my Children to the vallue of four pounds sterling or thereabouts which sume if it be not already allowed and paid you by my Brother Nick Lowe you may demaund it of him and alsoe the sume of fiue pounds sterHng which with the five pounds lent you by my wife at Chelsey will be tenn pounds which sume I intend you as a recompence for yo' Care and trouble about my Children and soe I rest Your Loueing freind To Mf Byard at Chelsy C. B. neere London p Capt? Christopher Eueling. Maryland 15* Jully 1679. Good Brother That which I haue written to Mf Byard in the aboue letter to her I desire you will doe me the fauour to Comply with (viz) in relation to the mony aboue mentioned and Charge what you pay vnto her to the accompt of — Your Lo : Bro : in Law To Mf Nicholas Lowe C : B : mer? in'Philpot Lane In London. Maryland 14* Jully 1679 Dick Burk. I haue appointed my Bro : Nick Lowe Mf Thomas Gilbert M' Barnaby Dunck and your selfe to be my attorneys Reuoaking the former power I left w'.b Copley; Arthur, and Allibond and wheras I haue writ to my Brother Nick Lowe to Joyne with you and Mr Dunck in the setting of my house yet if the times should be any thing more faueorable I would then haue you tell my brother from me that you & he may 316 forbeare letting of it vntill my further orders to you and the rest of my attorneys by the first shipp from hence next fall I rest C. B. 14* July 1679 Brother Lowe I did by a former order as now I doe againe by this desire yon to pay out moneys to My seruant Richard Burk for the occasions of my Children and alsoe to reimbourse the said Burk all such moneys as he had lay'd downe in necessaries for my Children afore that order of mine came to your hands, or since and that what moneys you pay him for the occasions aboue Specified you take perticular receipts from vnder his hand the Avhich I desire you to keepe for Your affec Bro : in Law To Mf Nicholas Lowe— C. B. In London. 14* July 1679 M' Dunck This goeth by Capt? Christopher Eueling and is the last opportunity I shall haue of sending to you vntill the returne of the shipping by Capt? Sheppard Comandf of the Se George who is yet in Pottomock, I writt you a letter dated the first of June & therein were inclosed seuerall bills of Ex! for the sume of 143218: 78: 2d the second bills for which sumes as alsoe a Coppy of that letter I send you heerwith ; I Likewise haue heere Enclosed a letter of Attorney to your selfe Bro : Lowe, Mf Thomas Gilbert and Dick Burk for you to act in my be halfe in Case of any Law of suits which may happen about any part of my Estate in England or Ireland or on any other 317 occasion whatsoeuer, desireing you as I haue formerly donn to Enquire after my Children and to knoAv of Dick Burk how they are furnished, and supplied by my brother Lowe whome I haue desired to supply theire wants, he haueing moneys of mine in his hands to that purpose. There was shiped on the Virg! factor Robert Jowles Comandf thirty fiue hhds of tobacco on my accompt, and fifteene vpon Thomas Notleys accompt who is dead and I and Coll Rozier are Executors to his Estate soe that I desire those fifteene as well as the thirty fiue may be sould by you onely I desire that the accompt may be kept seuerally. I haue drawne a bill of Ex! on you in fauor of Richard Burk for forty pounds ster. which when tendered pray Comply with being dated the 10* instant a bill drawne on you of the same date for tenn pounds paiable to Mf Mary Darnall and one other of the like date for twenty pounds paiable to Mf Phillip Darnall all which I desire that you will be pleased to satisfie according to theire seuerall tenours. And now I haue onely this to request that you will be pleased to buy for me the seuerall particulars sett downe in a memorandum heerwith sent you and that by the first and safest opportunity they may be sent to me and that you will be so kind as to write by all opportunities to — Mine and wifes kind respects Your Lo : freind to madm6 Dunck and the same C. B. to your brother 14£ July 1679 Cosen Gilbert I hope you will be so kind as to excuse the trouble I hereby p'sume to throw vpon you, and not onely this but likewise that you'll pardon me for nominateing you one of my Attor neys w6b I begg you'll please to accept of your Relatione to 318 my wife and y' greate kindnesse & Civilitys to me vpon all occationes when I was in England makes me thus bold \vith you ; Assureing you when it shall lye in my way to seme you I will as readily do it as any Relation or freind you haue : I haue herewith sent a lfe to the Ld Anglesey and one to the Lord Tsaueonberge wcb I begg you'll favour me to deliver w* your owne hand, and putt theire LordPE8 in mind of theire kindnesse they promised to shew me in my Absence and that I would haue returnd this shipping but haueing lost him that was my Lieu' Gen1 here and the greate Apjirehensions of mischiefes from Forraine Indians w°.b the managem' of Affaires in Virginia hath drawne on vs occationes my stay vntill the next returne of shipping ; And if any thing relateing to my Province should be moved at the Councell for Forraine Plan- tationes that you Avould please to appeare there for me and lett thm know the reason I returne not as I once resolved to haue don : S' Rob' Southwell who is Cheife Sccrf to the Lords for Plantatione affaires will acquaint you if any thing be moved at that board, to whome give my humble service ; and if you can when the other occationes will permitt it present my humble service to the Marquis of dorchester and Lord Craven and desire the continuance of theire Lopps. favour towards me you will herein highly oblige me Avhome you shall ever find gratefull for what civilitys and favours you think fitt to lay on deare Cosen Yf Affec? freind & serv' C. B. Coppys of Ires to Mf Barnaby Dunck from the 24?!' of No- vemb' 1679 to the of 1680. This is by a Beddiford vessell, named the beginning one Atkins Mf & being the first bound from these parts, I thought 319 it necessary to giue y? notice of my receipt of yours of the 7* August with the enclosed ace? of Daniell Arthurs ballance w°.b y? haue reel Cap? Phillipps, Oswold Wheatly, young Edw? Paine and Cap? James Strong being arriued here from Lond? and now your Bro : Walter is dayly expected by whome I hope to receiue a further ace? from y? of the bills of Ex?- 1 sent y? by Cap! Eueling Comand' of the York Merch?, which were duplicate and the second Bills to those which went w* Cap? Sheppard both w6b Shipps I was informed by Strong were iust arriued in the Downes as he sett saile from thence. I and my wife hold our selues much obliged to y? for yof great kindnesse and Care of our Children as also of my concernes in yo' hands for w?h I will endeavour to make some suitable returne in any thing wherein I can serue y? and yof By the first Lond? vessell I will giue y? an answer to yof aboue menconed and hope to be able by Phillipps to consigne a small quantity of my Ridge tob : haueing an ambitione to send some in that lucky Shipp. Mine and my wifes kind respects to Mad! Dunck w* the same to yof selfe I rest Yof Loueing Friend Vast Cropps of Tob : made in virg* and this Province so that I do expect it will be a drugg ; its sayd that there is made this last Cropp in Virg?- as much as has beene in tliree yeares togeather and in Maryland the greatest Cropp that euer I heard of. Decembf 30* 1679 Mf Dunck This goeth by Cap? Phillipps who this day came from Arrundell into Patuxent River and only Stayeth for this Ire. On Christmas day your Brother Walter came into Patuxent 320 w* the Charles and is now going up with her to Severne from whence is expected within three dayes the Lone Oswold Whcately Comandf Yof p yof Bro : Walter I haue recd for which I kindly thank y? and for the trouble y? haue in my Concernes I haue not had any Leisure as yett to pervse any of yof xlfes so as to be able to returne that answer which I intend to make by the next opportunity and' shall only now. desire y? to take notice by this that if my howse in Southampton Buildings be not lett out that it be kept vnlett and my goods to remaine therein haueing changed my resolutions touching my Children Avhome I now resolue shall Hue togeather there and to that end I am resolued to haue my Son Cecill sent for to towne hopeing by May to be with them my selfe. I am satisfied from severall hands of yof Care and kindnesse to them the which 1 pray continue towards them and also that y? Avill take Care with my other Attorneys that my Concerns now in Chancery may not suffer for Avant of good Councell and such necessary disbursements on them as my Seruant Richard Burke shall informe y? from whome y? Avill haue an ace? of what I can but in short now hint vnto y? being re solued to enlarge in this and other matters Avhen my howse is Cleere from the Crowd of people which this Christmas I haue with me. By the Crowne Malegoe I send y? tenn hhd.8 of my Ridge Tob : which I desire y? Avill lett goe Avith the rest to Holland where I hope for a good markett it being good bright Tob : and Suitable to that place. Mine and my wifes respects to yo' selfe and Mad? Dunck I take Leave in haste — Yof Trudy Loueing Friend — I haue rec? all the goods y.° shipt and sent me on the Charles with my thankes for the same — 321 Feb. 13'b 1679 This serues Cheifly to advize y? that I haue drawne three bills of Ex? all of one Tenor and date for thirty pounds three shiUings sterling payable vnto Mf Wm Meade or his ordf haue ing rec? the value thereof of Mf Robert Roberts which I de sire you will punctually Comply with and the same place to the ace? of Yof very loueing Friend To Mf Barnaby Dunck Merch! att S? Marie Hill Lond° Feb. 26tb 1679. Mf Dunck Sr. I haue drawne on y? this Day three Bills of Ext all of one tenor and date for the Sume of three hundred fifty fiue pounds Sterling payable att thirty day sight to Mf Katharine Grudgefield or her ordf in part of fiue hundred pounds sterling a Legacy left her by her Bro: Thomas Nottley Esqf Dec? late Govenour of Maryland which Bills pray accpt and pay punctually according to tenof take receipt for the same and place it to the ace? of Yof Loueing Friend To Mf Barnaby Dunck Merch? att S? Marie Hill in Lond? 41 322 No. 18. WILLIAM PENN TO CHARLES, LORD BALTIMORE. [Indorsement.] W?1 Pens Letter to my Lord Baltemore of the 10* of Aprill 1681 [Superscription.] For my Honor? Freind the Lord Baltimore Govf & Propr" of Maryland Westminster 10* 2T Ap. 1681 — It haueing graciously pleas'd the King vpon divers good considerations to make me a neighbour to Mary-land, I thought it necessary to make some offer of Freindship, & give a fitt rise for a future good correspondence. I omitt the Per- ticulers of my pretentions, they are so kindly & amply exprest in the Kings letter & to a man of good sense, 'tis enough to be once told of the matter. The Bearer is a Gentleman & my Kinsman, to whom I haue left the manage of my affaires ; as his integrety will in sist vpon my right, his prudence & experience will always guide him from an indecent thing. I only begg one thing 'tis short but the text of all th' can be said, do to me as thou wouldest be done to. I am a strainger in the affaires of the Country, he can haue little light from me, I do so much de pend vpon the influence & prevalence The Kings goodness Avill haue vpon thee, th' I omitt to be any further solicitous, belieueing th' a great & prudent man, Avill always act w* cau tion & obedience to the mind of his Prince; so th? this 323 lett? was rather to be civil, then to pass so ill a complem' vpon the Lord Baltimore, or the Kings letter, as to think it could giue any aide to the one, or light to the other. I shall conclude w* this request that It would please thee to giue my Cousen & Deputy all the dispatch possible in the business of the bounds th' obsemeing our just limitts in th' & aU other things we may begin & mantaine our Just & freindly intercourse wob I do here promess to endeavour & obserue on my part w* all the truth & care Imaginable ; & whateuer favours he receiues, I shall place to my account ; & perhaps there are many Avays by w6h I may discharge them, w6b may giue the Lord Baltimore reason to belieue I do not undeserue the usage & quality of his Very true Freind My Respects to thy lady W1? Penn. My Kinsmans name is William Markham. No. 19. WILLIAM PENN TO FRISBY, JONES, AND OTHERS. [Indorsement.] [Superscription.] W? Penn's Lre of the 16* 7b6r 1681 to some Inhabitants of Baltemore County and Cecill County. For James Frisby, Edw? Jones, August 324 [Indorsement.] Seal. Penn Akms. Herman George Ouldfeild, Henry Ward & Henry Johnson at their Plantations in Penn-Sylvania received this let? out of th? hands of Jn? Highland comming from Sy' Wf Penn from London, with Mf Haige, at my house in Bohem. man?' the 14. January A? 168J into my Custody. ' Teste Augustine Herrman- London 16* 7bI8 1681 My Freinds I hope I do not improperly call you so, because in being so, you will extreamly befreind your selues, as well as perform an act of Duty to the King & Justice to me. I am equally a strainger to you all, but yf being represented men of substance & reputation in th? part of the bay, w°.b I presume falls within my Pattent, I chose to take this opertu- nity to begin our acquaintance & by you w* the rest of the people on yf side of my Country & do assure you & them, th' I will be so farr from takeing any advantage to draw great proffits to my selfe, th? you shall find me & my goverm? easy free & Just and as you shall study to be faire & respectfull to me & my Just Interests, I will not be short of giueing you all reasonable assurances on my part th? I will Hue kindly & well w* you & for this you haue my word under my hand. I think fitt to Caution you, (if within my bounds, as I am ready 325 to believe, but I desire no more then my own) th' none of you pay any more Taxes or Sessm'.8 by any order or law of Mary land ; for if you do, it will be greatly to your own wrong as well as my prejudice ; though I am not conscious to my selfe of such an insufficiency of poAv' here w* my Superiors as not to be able to weather th? difficulty if you should. But the opinion I haue of the Lord Baltimores Prudence as well as Justice & of your regard to your ov/n Interests & future good of your Posterity, makes me to waue all objections of th? na ture & to hope we shall all do the thing th? is Just & honest (w°.b is allways wise) according to our respectiue stations. I have no more to add, but my good wishes for all yf happiness, & th' by the help of Almighty god, next Spring, you shall haue some testemony of my best endeavours to contribute towards it, as becomes my Duty to god, to the King & to their people. I am Pray Salute me to 1 Your Reall Frd : } all yf Neighbours J W? Penn. No. 20. WILLIAM PENN TO CHARLES, LORD BALTIMORE. 12 March 168$ lfe to me from M' Pen being in to the Ld Baltemores of the 24* of Janu' 1682 My Noble Freind I must needs hold my selfe obleidged to thee for the Civil Reception I found in Maryland as well as th' respect th' was 326 shown by the last express, the news it brought gave Credit to a Runier I was unwilling to receive, I mean the death of thy Uncle, a man of Prudence & Ingeneous Conversation. It is a Sermon of Mortality, & so much vigor to be so soon vanisht, shows w? fraile things Ave are, & how little we act the Avise & the good men to persue w* stifness a comfort th' can not keep us Company further then the grave. My many & urgent businesses would not give me leave to send the Inclosed sooner, I hope the delay has proved no manner of disappointment to thee of an Apology in this af faire I will say no more till we meet. A Story came the other day to my Ears that the Lord Baltimore was w* Cap' Conway at Cap? Wards, their takeing an observation, as also up the Sasquehanagh River; but I gave no Credit to it, takeing it for graunted That I should have had notice of so neer an ap proach from the Lord baltimores order, the thing being of th' moment & in me disrespectfull had I had reason to have beleived it, not to have waited vpon him, & he so neer. I hope by the end of this month, to have some prospect when I may attend thee (the Gen1.1 Assembly sitting at this time) I am extreamly desireous to yeild in all points not essentially distructive to my right, & the great & Costly merrits of my Cause, resolveing w* much care & affection to approve my selfe Thy very Loveing My Respects Neighbour & True Frd : to thy lady Wm. Penn. Philadelphia 12* lr 83 The narrative inclosed to me had its defects w?b our 2d in- tervew may help 327 No. 21. WILLIAM PENN TO CHARLES, LORD BALTIMORE. [Indorsement.] Mf Penns Lre of the 30* May (83) to the Lord Baltemore My Noble Fr? Major Sawyer being yet behind, I embrace the opertunity to recommend to the Lord Baltimore thos divers amicable proposals & expedients that I offerd to him for an happy issue of our present affaire. This is so necessary to me, & of th' mighty moment, (both w* respect to the plantation of yf side of my Country, av* a number of people ready to seat it) The injoym? of my famely (a comfort inestimable here below) now at a great distance, & must so remaine till this dispute be ended) & finally the settlem? of my heirs in an un disturbed Right before I dye. That he will excuse my im portunity for his Speedy & final resolve ; haveing upon serious thoughts, determined w* myselfe, to embarque for England by the first Conveniency. If the Lord Baltimore is not pleased to receive any of the former proposals; much more If he should continue to think of any claime to any of thes Lower Countys. And this I thought fitt to mention, because I would not be often troublesome to the Ld Baltimore & his people w* expresses in this hot season of the year. I have no more to add, but that I hope the Lord Baltimore will please to impute the meanness of his entertainm' to the unexpectedness of the occasion, & th' he will give me leave to assure him I am w* much sincerity & affection. My Noble Frd Newcastle the Thy very Resp'^ Fr? 30. 3"?° 83 W" Penn 328 No. 22. WILLIAM PENN TO CHARLES, LORD BALTIMORE. [Indorsement.] , 6* of June 1683 Wf Penns Lfe to the Lord Baltemore My Noble Fr? If vpon my arrival in this Province, I did immediately dispatch my Secretary with two other gentlemen to Salute the Lord Baltimore & assure him of my respects & frdshp's If so soon as I had pay'd my duty to my Royall Patrone the Duke, I did incontinently take a longe Journy in a cold and un pleasant season, th' I might personally give him the further Pledges, of a freindly agreement & neighbourhood. And if I did then therefore wave to press myn own Advantages, be cause I found it uneasy to him ; And lastly, if in my after Correspondences, and especially as our last intervew, I have declined the rigour of my plea & both propos'd and prest some of the mildest & most healing expedients th' if possible, wc might be the last Arbitrators of our own affaires without the need of an other umpire, then the good will we ought to bear to a mutual & lasting union, The Lord Baltimore, I would think, will be so kinde as to lett me hope, he will par don me if I stop here, & shall hold myself acquitted by the endeavours I have used, w* so much Industry & submission, for a freindly Issue. And if there were anything below what I have already offer'd besides Ruine to my Province, God is both my wittness & my Judge, I should be but too apt to encline. My Noble Fr? I am not mov'd by the power of Ambition or Avarice; It is Conveniency yea necessity th' bids me 329 stand. I deal freely. I have outrun all Councels, th' I might purchase peace, tho' with loss ; but w'.b distruction, even nature & Reason forbid. What I seek be it myn own, & so my due ; or the Lord Baltimf & as such, if he please, my Pur chase, It is of th' minute Consequence to him & mighty mo ment to me, because to his Country the Tale or Skirt, to my Province the Mouth or Inlett, that the disproportion of the vallue & Conveniency th' it beares to either of us, will defend, at least, indulge my greater Importunity ; And yet while the advantage seems to be mine, It is most manefest it will be greatly his proffitt to comply ; since it will lay his Province between tAvo planted Countrys, And the People transporting themselves to Pennsilvania in Ships consign'd to Maryland and thos ships yearly bringing such englesh goods as we shall Avant, will naturally draw our people into his Province to furnish themselves, & to make Maryland the Mark of english Trade, at least for many yeares. What shall I say, My Noble Freind, if the powerfull charmes of interest, if the Love of good neighbourhood, if th' w°b is always to be prefer'd, w* Persons of the Lord Balti mores Loyalty, I mean Duty to the King, prevale, I must yet promess myselfe an agreement in some faire & happy ex pedient, & lay by (w°h shall be av* delight) the thoughts of an englesh voyage, th' else, the state of my affaires here, & of my famely there, will of necessity obleidge me to & th' speedely. I shall end av* this assurance wob I have often Given, and shall most religiously observe, that I shall sincerely embrace all occasions by wob I may approve my selfe My Noble Fr? Thy very Firme Philadelphia & Affect. Fr? & Neigh: 6sh 4™ jn 83 W? Penn 42 330 No. 23. CHARLES, LORD BALTIMORE, TO WM. MARKHAM. [Indorsement.] His Lor?!8 Letter to Markham of the 5'.b of June 1682. Munday the 5* of June 1682 Sf I haue receiud yo'.8 of the 26* of the last month and am Sorry it came noe sooner to my hands for I haue dispatcht some Gentlemen away to meet you at the time Appointed and therefore am no Avise Avilling to put of this buisnesse of the ascertaining the bounds betwixt M* Pen and me There are many Reasons to be giuen by me for it but at present shall only offer you these two, ffirst that by a letter from his Most sacred Maiesty procured and sent by the said Penn I am Commanded to joyne with M' Penn or his Agents for the speedy settling our bounds and then Mf Penns OAvne letter Avhich you brought me prest very much the same thing; Secondly that M' Penn the last shipping writt and sent in a letter to seuerall Gentlemen of note that are Certainly within my Prouince as M' Augustin Herman Capt? Ward, Coll Wells &c hinting to them that he was confident they would come within his Gouerm' a thing not kindly taken and to be plaine not according to the Goulden rule mentioned in Mf Penns Letter to me, Doe to thy neighbor as thou wouldst he should doe to thee Now certainly such proceedings were not Neighbour like and Avhen I haue the happiness to see my friend I must be plaine w* him as to that point for as I de sire noe more then my due soe I take it very vnkindly that some of the Inhabitants vp the Bay should be soe Posest as 331 they haue been by th* Letter of Mf William Penns — ffor these reasons Sf I must begg leaue to say I will not admitt of any further delay you well knowing th' yo' Late sickness has bin the only hinderance hitherto. Let me therfore now presse you to send persons qualified and equally impowr'd av* those persons who on my part are already gon and will be in all probability with you afore this will arriue at your hands I haueing Possitiuely orderd them to request the same from you on the behalfe of Yo' faithfull friend & Seru? C. B: Superscription To the Ho'."5 Cap? W?1 Markham Gou' of Pensiluania hast hast Post hast. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE. When the Calvert Papers were presented to the Society on the 10th December last the corresponding secretary, in concluding his account of their finding, expressed the hope that some member, visiting England, might feel sufficient interest in the subject to ascertain, if possible, the facts, first as to whether these papers are those supposed to have been contained in the two chests seen in the British Museum in 1839; and second in regard to the papers said to have been buried. It is therefore with much satisfaction that we are enabled to state that during the past summer Mr. Julian LeEoy White, a member of this Society, undertook the investigation with results which he narrates in the following letter, read at the October meeting of the Society. Mendes Cohen, November 1, 1889. Corresponding Secretary. Baltimore, October 9, 1889. Dear Sir, — According to your request I give you an account of the search for the Calvert papers alleged to have been buried. On the 9th of July last I met Col. Harford by appointment at " Down Place." He showed me the rubbish heap on his grounds where his former butler, Keep, had as the result of his instructions buried tlie papers eight or ten years ago. He was uncertain as to date, exact site or quantity or quality of papers buried, but was quite willing that I should examine the ground, and was altogether very obliging, taking trouble to assist me. After no little effort Keep, the former servant of Col. Harford, was found in London and brought to " Down Place," where I had already provided a small force of laborers. 333 334 Keep told me that he had buried the papers because they would not burn. He had first been told to burn them, he said, and I gathered from him that the best looking papers were removed from the heap before they were dumped by him loosely, and not enclosed in any box or chest, into a hole prepared by him. These selected documents I understood were included in the collection which we secured last year. Col. Harford's mother, Keep said, was very careful of these papers, but at her death the place was for rent and the tenant objected to having this load of papers kicking about in the cellar— hence the order to burn. Keep said that he had taken his bearings carefully at the time of the burial, thinking that the documents might be wanted again ; and showed me exactly where the papers should be within a foot or two. Here with three men to dig we worked away until we had pretty well examined a space of more than ten feet square, going down below the lowest point that Keep could have reached, cutting through roots of trees and into quite wet ground. We found nothing of the papers. While the work was proceeding Col. and Mrs. Harford came and looked over an adjoining fence. Mrs. H. said to me : " I wonder if he ever buried them." This in brief describes the searcli which was most carefully made, and which covered a period of several days, in fact from the 5th to the 17th July. The conclusion would seem to be, that the papers were either entirely destroyed before our search by their long exposure in the damp earth ; or they were never buried, but possibly sold as old parchment or waste paper. Tho latter alternative seems tho more probable as it is hardly possible that if buried there should have been no vestige left of this mass of docu ments, many of which were of parchment. I need not say that I regret very much that I could find nothing to bring back to the Society. Believe me, Yours very truly, J. LeRoy White. Me. Mendes Cohen, Corresponding Secretary, Maryland Historical Society. z,y REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF MARYLAND. A Paper read before the Maryland Historical Society, December 9th, 1889. laltimors, 1890. REPORT OP THE COMMITTEE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF MARYLAND. REPORT or THE COMMITTEE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF MARYLAND. -.1 Sfimd-1£Pubitcation, HJlo. 20. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON TH] WESTERN BOUNDARY OF MARYLAND. A Paper read before the Maryland Historical Society, December 9th., 1889. $nllimun», 1890. PEABODY PUBLICATION FUND. Committee on Publication. 1889-90. HENRY STOCKBRIDGE, BRADLEY T. JOHNSON, CLAYTON C. HALL. Printed bt John Mdhpht & Co. Printers to the Maryland Historical Society. Baltimore, 1890. REPORT. THE original boundaries of the Province of Maryland were laid down with unwonted precision in the charter which created it. These were : the fortieth parallel of north latitude; a meridian line running south to the Md. charter first or most distant fountain of the Poto- in Md. Arch. mac — ("ad verum meridian um primi Council, fontis fluminis de Patowomack") thence Appendix proceeding southward (" deinde vergendo versus meridiem ") to the farther or western bank of that river, and following that bank to a specified point at the mouth of the river where it debouches into the Chesapeake; thence by a straight line across the bay to Watkins Point and onward to the ocean, and thence by the ocean and Delaware bay and river to the fortieth parallel. The only one of these courses that was at all uncertain at the time the charter was granted, was that at the extreme west. The country to the west of the Alleghanies was then altogether unknown. 2 " 5 Indeed, for many years the geography of the con tinent was so little understood, that Herman, in his map (1670), considers the mountains about Cum berland to be the central ridge between the two oceans. The point at which the meridian line was to begin had, therefore, to remain undetermined until it should be found which was the furthest source or first fountain of the Potomac : in other words, which of the branches of that river took its rise farthest from its mouth. This point settled, the spring-head or source of that branch determined the western boundary of Maryland. In 1649, Charles II, then a fugitive in Holland, Boundary granted to Lord Hopton, Sir Thomas Cul- °m85. ep' peper, and other exiled royalists, a tract of M , •, • i ¦ McMahon, vast extent ot territory within two or Hist. Md., three hands ; and in 1675 they sent agents p' 5°' to England to remonstrate against it, or, if remon strance were unavailing, to buy out the grantees' claims ; but without success in either case. By the year 1688 the whole title had vested in Thomas, Lord Culpeper; and James II va.Acts, granted him a new patent for the whole 1736- tract. This descended to Catharine, his daughter and heiress, who brought it in marriage to Thomas, fifth Baron Fairfax of Cameron, in the Scottish peerage. Lord Fairfax proposed to reap some advantage from his immense territorial possessions, which were still unsurveyed ; and in 1733 petitioned the King for the determination of his boundaries by commissioners. The petition was granted, and six commissioners were appointed, three represent ing Virginia, and three the Crown, who determined the boundaries separating his grant from the rest of Virginia. The grants had all called for lands lying south of the Potomac river; and consequently there was nothing in them interfering with the 8 rights of Maryland. For this reason, probably, Charles, Lord Baltimore, made no attempt to have Maryland represented on the Commission. But when the question arose, which was the Potomac river, or which of the two great branches which unite to form it was the longer, the com- Dinwiddie ° Papers, ii, missioners (in 1736) concluded that the North Branch was the longer; Maryland, whose territory was at stake, having no voice in the matter. In 1745, Thomas, sixth Baron Fairfax, Ibid., I, 19. ' ' Faulkner's came to America ; and on October 17, in the following year, surveyors engaged to run the line in conformity with the report of the commissioners, planted " the Fairfax Stone " to mark the northwestern limit of his grant. In 1748 the Virginia Assembly approved the line run by the commissioners, it was confirmed by the King in Council, and Fairfax opened an office for the sale of lands. News of these proceedings reached Frederick, Md Lord Baltimore, and in his first letter of Archives, instructions (1753) to his new governor, (MS.) ' o . Lib. j.k., Horatio Sharpe, he protests against this see Ippen- invasion of his territory, and directs the dlxB- Governor to look into the matter, and to open correspondence with Lord Fairfax with a view to a settlement of boundaries between them. 9 When these instructions were laid before the Mary land Council, they proceeded to inform themselves about the lands in question and the length of the rivers. They called before them Col. Thomas Cresap, a settler in the extreme west of the Pro vince, who knew the country well ; and he assured them that the South was the longer ibid., P. 13. branch, running, as he believed, about sixty miles northwest farther than the North Branch. Sharpe also wrote to Fairfax, calling his attention to the fact that the South Branch, accord- Md. Arch. ing to the best information, was the true corrc^nd- source of the Potomac, and proposing that ™oe, 1, 6, 7. they should unite in determining the cor- dix c. rect boundary. Fairfax replied that he was of opinion that it would be to his advantage to have the South rather than the North Branch as his boundary ; but that he thought the two governors were the proper persons to settle the question. He apparently believed that what he should gain by the extension of his territory to the west would more than offset what he should lose between the two branches. Colonel Cresap, in the next year, made a survey of both branches, and sent SharPe, Governor Sharpe a map of his drawing, Corr- :- 72- in which their position and length are pretty accu rately laid down. A copy of this map is Appendix appended to this report. 10 Sharpe, it is evident, was prepared to take all necessary steps for asserting and securing the rights of Maryland ; but the outbreak of the French and Indian war in the next year (1754) prevented further action. We find him Sharpe, Corr., writing to the Proprietary in 1756 that " no survey can be safely made within eighty miles of the South Branch by less than a body of 100 or 200 men." i^es Ams ^n 1^62 Colonel Cresap wrote in person caivert to the Proprietary confirming his previous Pap's. statements and adding particulars. The treaty of Paris, in 1763, which closed the war, gave an opportunity for a final settlement of the question ; but the King, finding it necessary to adjust the boundaries of his colonial possessions, and to carry out his agreement with the Indians, Md Arch, issued a proclamation prohibiting the colo- m nial governments from granting any lands u. s., lying west of the heads of rivers flowing Appendix into the Atlantic from the west and north- E- west. About the same time the Proprie tary conceived the idea of reserving for himself a manor of 10,000 acres in the western part of the Province, and sent out orders that no lands beyond Cumberland were to be granted to settlers until this manor was laid off. These causes combined to prevent settlements in the extreme west of Mary- 11 land, which otherwise would have led to a final settlement of the boundary. Governor Pigman,g Eden, however, in 1771 appointed com- ReP- 1834- missioners, of whom Cresap was one, to survey and mark the head of the South Branch. He did so ; marked the spot with a stone bearing the letters CLDB, and continued the line northward. On completing his labors, he filed a very accurate map in the Land Office. In May, 1774, Mr. Jenifer, the Proprietary's agent, remonstrated against the action of the Board of Revenue, who were opening to settlers the lands ofthe "Western Reserve," as it was called, telling the Board that while there was no doubt that the South Branch was the true boundary of the Pro vince, yet that it was inexpedient to grant lands in the territory claimed by Fairfax while the Propri etary was waiting an opportunity to bring the whole matter before the King. The Board reply that it is not for them to take any action proc. which may tend to prejudice the Propri- Eeven°e etary's claims or imply any doubt as to McMahon. their validity. " The Proprietary," they say, " has lately been at the expense of running a line to the South Branch ; and if the Virginians hear that he doubts about the extension of these limits, it will be an encouragement to them to begin to throw stones." Holding this view, they continued to 12 grant lands in the Western Reserve until October, 1774, when instructions were received from the guardians of the new Proprietary, Henry Harford (a minor), to suspend all further grants of the reserved lands. Thus the question stood at the outbreak of the Revolution. Fairfax still held the northern neck under the royal government of Virginia ; and when that colony assumed the position of a sovereign State, he held it under the State government. In 1785, on account of the alienage of Denny Fairfax, McMahon, devisee of Lord Fairfax, the Virginia p,B9, Assembly claimed the land as forfeit; but this claim was not upheld by the Supreme 1813, Court of the United States. 7t J?0r7anc ' At the outbreak of the Revolution, (McMahon.) the^ ^e question was still unsettled. Maryland claimed her western boundary under her charter, which had never been revoked or broken ; and this claim had never been yielded, waived, or compromised. This claim, from the first, was to the farthest source of the Potomac, whichever that might be found to be ; and undis puted surveys had shown that the South Branch took its rise from the farthest source, and was therefore the true boundary of Maryland. Virginia recognized the equity of Maryland's position, and in her first Constitution, adopted June 29, 1776, inserted an article confirming to the 13 State of Maryland, in the fullest and most explicit manner, all that the latter claimed. The words are : " The territories contained within the charters erecting the colonies of Maryland, Pennsylvania, North and South Carolina, are hereby ceded, released, and 1776, forever confirmed to the people of those colonies respectively, with all the rights of property, jurisdiction, and government, and all other rights whatsoever which might, at any time heretofore, have been claimed by Virginia, except the free navigation and use of the rivers Potomac and Poko- moke, with the property of the Virginia shores or strands bordering on either of the said rivers, and all improvements which have been or shall be made thereon." Though this was full and complete enough, yet the phraseology " ceded " and "released" implied an assertion of rights which Maryland had never admitted. The first Constitutional Convention of Maryland (October, 1776) was by no means dis posed to allow the State to be represented as the recipient of Virginia's bounty ; and in order that her position and claims might be perfectly clear, this article of the Virginia constitution was taken into consideration, and the following resolution adopted : " Resolved, unanimously, that it is the opinion of this Con vention that the State of Virginia hath not any Jour. 0f right or title to any of the territory, bays, rivers, Convention. or waters included in the charter granted by his majesty, Charles I, to Cecilius Calvert, Baron of Baltimore." 14 After this disclaimer on the part of Virginia and assertion of rights by Maryland, a compact was Hening, made between the two States, Messrs. Md. Acts Jenifer, Stone, and Chase being the com- "* 5< missioners on the part of Maryland, and (Kuty.) Mason and Henderson on the part of Virginia, providing for riparian rights on the Potomac, trespasses, the return of fugitives from justice, etc. This compact was ratified by the legislatures of both states in the same year, and re-enacted in the Virginia codes of 1849 and 1860. So careful was Maryland, on the one hand, not to seem to waive any of her rights, and, on the other, not to appear discourteous to Virginia, who Md. Acts appeared so equitably disposed to her, {™P that when, in 1788, it became necessary Ch' 44- to allot portions of the Western Reserve as bounty-lands to soldiers of the Revolution, care was taken to set out the 2575 allotments in territory north of the North Branch of the Potomac, and running next to "the present supposed boundary of Maryland." Under a resolution of the Assem- Md. Acts, bly in the previous year, Francis Deakin Ch7S44 nac^ been employed to survey and plot Preamble, the lands lying west of Fort Cumberland, and by his plot the bounty-lands were laid out. But to avoid all misconstruction, in the same act the Assembly declared : 15 " That the line to which the said Francis Deakin has laid out the said lots is, in the opinion of the General ? 15. Assembly, far within that which this State may rightfully claim as its western boundary ; arid that at a time of more leisure the consideration of the legislature ought to be drawn to the western boundaries of this State, as objects of very great importance." As the Charter of Maryland was clear in the definition of the boundary, and as the Constitution of Virginia had pledged that State to acceptance of the line laid down in the Charter, nothing now remained to be done but to survey and mark the line. In 1795, by a resolution of the Vid. Assembly, Messrs. Pinkney, Cooke, and Mdlgf10ts' Key were appointed commissioners on Ees- 128- the part of Marjdand to meet a commission from Virginia, and adjust the southern and western boundaries of the State. Mr. Pinkney, however, was sent on a foreign mission, and Mr. Cooke declined to act, as did also Messrs. Carroll and Chase, who were appointed in their places. Mr. Key soon afterwards removed from the State. In 1801 the Assembly, by a resolution, empow ered the Governor and Council to appoint Md. ActS) commissioners for the same purpose, and utmPra- Messrs. Duvall, McDowell, and Nelson were ap pointed on the part of Maryland. Part of the 16 correspondence between Governors Mercer and Council Monroe has been preserved, from which Rec, 1802, it appears that the Virginia legislature Jun. & Nov. . . (See appointed commissioners, but limited their powers to a settlement of the western line. In this correspondence Gov. Mercer points out that the first step to be taken is to determine on which of the branches the first fountain of the Potomac is to be found. This point once settled, there could be no possibility of dispute as to the western boundary, which was a due north line from that point; nor as to the south-western boundary, which followed the right bank of the river. This disagree ment seems to have prevented further proceedings ; and though, in 1803, Governor Mercer, then in the Maryland House of Delegates, recommended run ning a provisional line until further steps Md. Acts, & I r 1810. could be taken, nothing came of it. A resolution of similar tenor was passed in 1810, but without results. By the year 1818, Maryland seems to have grown weary of attempts to recover her invaded territory, and the Assembly passed an Act author- Md. Acts, > J l 1818. izing the appointment of three commis sioners to meet commissioners from Vir ginia, and run a line from "the most western source of the North Branch of the Potomac," due north to the Pennsylvania line. Foreseeing that even this 17 line would inclose lands granted by Virginia, the act provided for the regranting such lands free of charge. This act, however, was not to be operative until the Virginia legislature should have passed an act with similar provisions. Virginia did not act in the matter until 1821, when her legislature passed an act indeed, but one differing materially from the Maryland act. The Maryland act pro vided for the ascertainment of " the most western source of the North Branch of the Potomac" as the beginning of the line; the Virginia act See provided for the beginning of the line at Md18f1cts' the Fairfax stone, which had never been Ees- 125- recognized by Maryland, and, in fact, does not mark the farthest source of even the North Branch. Commissioners were, however, appointed by both States ; but on their meeting, in 1824, the Virginians produced their instructions, which, in themselves, were of a character to bar all further proceedings. The Maryland act, as has been said, instructed her commissioners to ascertain the most western source of the North Branch, and begin the line there; while the Virginia commissioners were instructed to proceed to the Fairfax stone and begin the line there. In other words, the compromise (if we can call so one-sided an offer a compromise) which Maryland, much to her own injury, had offered, was not enough unless she would concede all that Virginia now chose to claim. The Maryland com- 18 missioners were not willing, nor had they the power, to make this concession ; while on the other hand the Virginians refused, or were not author ized, even to investigate the pretensions of the Fairfax stone to mark the farthest source of the North Branch. The line must begin where Vir^ Boyie'sEep. ginia wanted it to begin, or not at all. So mt-t' a^ negotiation came to nothing, and the ch. 195. act of 1818 was repealed in 1825. Mary land's offer of a compromise having been thus rejected, she was remitted to her original rights. In 1826 resolutions were again passed by the Maryland Assembly providing for the Md. Acts, Jt J i & 1825-6. appointment of commissioners to meet commissioners from Virginia and settle the boundary. In case of disagreement, the Gov ernor of Delaware was to be requested to appoint an umpire. This resolution was not to go into effect until the Virginia Assembly should have provided for a similar commission, and should have pledged the faith of the State to abide by its award. A correspondence between Governors Kent and Tyler followed, but nothing came of it. In 1832 the Maryland Assembly (probably stim ulated by the very able discussion of the Md. Acts, J J i83i, question by McMahon in his History of Maryland, published in the preceding year) appointed a committee to inquire and reports — 19 1. What were the true charter boundaries of the State. 2. Whether the southern and western boundaries as laid down in the charter ought not to be taken as the true boundaries. 3. What is the first fountain of the Potomac as called for by the charter. 4. Whether Virginia had at any time recognized the claim of Maryland to all the land included in the charter. 5. Whether any survey could be found deter mining the first fountain of the Potomac. 6. The nature of the boundary dispute, the steps that had already been taken therein, and what further action, in their judgment, should be taken by the State to have the matter finally adjusted. The committee reported at length. In answer to the first question, they recite and explain Ibid. the language of the charter. To the second Res- 128- they say that the southern and western bounds as laid down in the charter should be the present boundaries of Maryland, that State having done nothing to divest herself of her rights. They add that the territory claimed is estimated to amount to 462,480 acres. To the third, that the first foun tain of the Potomac can easily be determined by survey. To the fourth, they cite the declaration of the Virginia Convention of 1776, and the resolution 20 in the Maryland Convention. To the fifth, they cite Cresap's survey of 1771, on file in the Land Office. In answer to the sixth, the committee review the whole controversy in its various stages. They con clude by recommending a commission similar to that provided for by the resolutions of 1826, "to settle and adjust by mutual compact between the two governments the southern and western limits of this State, and the dividing and boundary lines between this State and the Commonwealth of Virginia." As before, the Governor of Delaware was to be requested to appoint an umpire ; and the action of the Assembly was to have no effect until Virginia had provided for a similar commission, and pledged the faith of the State (as Maryland did), to abide by its award. In 1833 the Assembly of Virginia took action in va. Acts, the matter, but it was action of a peculiar See3Aphpe3n2- kind- No notice is taken of Maryland's dixF. overtures nor of her previous attempts to bring about a settlement: the act is worded as if it were a spontaneous and independent move ment on Virginia's part. It provides for the appointment of three commissioners on the part of Virginia "to meet such commissioners as may be appointed for the same purpose by the Common wealth of Maryland, to settle and adjust .... the 21 western limits of this State, and the dividing and boundary line between this State and the Common wealth of Maryland, to commence at the Fairfax stone, or at the first fountain of the Cohongoroota, or North Branch ofthe Potomac." Of course this action, besides being in a high degree discourteous to Maryland, was altogether different from the Maryland resolutions. The latter provided for a settlement by mutual compact, the commissioners to investigate and determine where the true boundary lay; the Virginia act, while preserving the phrase "mutual compact," dictates the place at which the line is to begin, and empowers its commissioners only to meet commis sioners from Maryland appointed " for the same purpose," that is, to begin the line at the Fairfax stone, or the head of the Cohongoroota. It is evi dent that no commissioners appointed under the Maryland resolutions would have power to make this concession ; and, in fact, the resolutions them selves could not go into effect. Moreover, no provision was made for umpirage in case of dis agreement, nor was the faith of the State pledged to abide by the award. It was, in fact, a rejection — and a rude rejection — of Maryland's friendly overtures. Indeed the Virginia Assembly evi dently anticipated such an interpretation, and provided that in case Maryland appointed no com- 3 22 missioners, the line should be run by Virginia alone, in the way she wanted it. This rebuff exhausted Maryland's patience. On March 14, 1834, the Assembly passed a Md. Acts, ' ' . 1833. temperately worded resolution expressing regret at the rejection of their advances, and instructing the attorney -general of the State to institute proceedings in the Supreme Court of the United States to procure a final adjustment of the southern and western boundaries; but providing that such suit should cease at any time, before final judgment, if Virginia would accept the overtures of 1832. It seemed now at last that the question must be definitely settled, either by mutual agreement or by judicial decision. But the resources of Virginia were not yet exhausted. Governor Tazewell, of that State, in his message of 1834, adverted to the matter, saying that Maryland had misunderstood the Virginia Act of 1833; that it was really intended as an acceptance, and not a rejection of the Maryland overtures ; but that Maryland having thought fit to assume a menacing attitude, it did not now comport with the dignity of Virginia to go into explanations. This message was not officially communicated to the Maryland Legislature, but reached them through the public press. 23 This adroit move was perfectly successful. The matter having been referred to by Gov- ernor I nomas, in his message, the special 1834. committee to whom the subject was es'"' referred, report that they see nothing in the matter now brought before them which calls for " any relaxation or change in the course deliberately determined upon at the last session;" and they wish it clearly understood that Maryland " seeks or desires nothing which is not hers of right ; and it is necessary for her honor that in a controversy, however amicable, the terms of adjustment shall not be dictated to her." The committee then refer to the Virginia act of 1833, which they declare "not only not in accordance with, but directly repulsive of," the Maryland overtures, and "an undertaking, in truth, by one of the parties absolutely to settle and pronounce against the claim of the other." But they add, that since they have learned from Governor Tazewell's message that Virginia is will ing to agree to terms of adjustment, "if the door of explanation be not closed upon her," they will not, for their part, let "any strained punctilio" stand in the way of an amicable settlement ; and they will repeal the resolution of March 14, 1834, direct the attorney general to discontinue proceedings under it, and now stand ready and desirous to settle the long-pending controversy by amicable negotiation. 24 They were left standing in this amiable attitude. Virginia made no further move. The provisional line of 1787, or " Deakin's line," as it was called, had long done duty as a boundary ; and as the State granted no lands beyond it, it came to be looked upon — despite the emphatic pro test of the Assembly of 1 788, as the true boundary line of the State. In process of time the marks became obliterated, and conflicts of title and litiga tion arose between the holders of Maryland and the holders of Virginia patents for lands in the debatable territory. So in May, 1852, Md. Acts, 1852. the Maryland Legislature passed an act reciting these facts and requesting the Governor to open a correspondence with the Gov ernor of Virginia about the matter; and authorizing him to appoint a commissioner, if the Legislature of Virginia would also appoint one, which joint com mission should run and mark a lino due north from the Fairfax Stone, which line, when ratified by both Legislatures, should be the boundary between the States. As this was an offer to give up the whole matter in controversy, it looked as if the contention was about to be settled at last. Virginia responded by an act of similar tenor in the following year. This, however, was superseded by an act passed in 1857-8 of somewhat different scope. This pro- 25 vided for a joint commission to trace the southern boundary from Smith's Point to the Atlantic ocean, and the western boundary from the Fairfax Stone to the Pennsylvania line. As the Maryland act of 1852 only empowered the settlement of the western boundary, Mr. T. J. Lee, the commissioner appointed under it, met Col. Angus W. McDonald, on the part of Virginia, to carry out his instructions. By application to the Federal government the services of an experienced engineer, Lieutenant N. Michler, were secured, and a line from the Fairfax Stone north to the Pennsyl vania line was run and marked. This line, when ratified by both Legislatures, was to be the definite boundary. Maryland proceeded to ratify Michler's line by an act passed March 6, 1860. Virginia, wi , 1 ° Md. Acts, however, did not proceed to ratification. i860. In the session of 1859-60 the Virginia Assembly passed two resolutions dealing with the subject. In the first they provided for the erection of suitable monuments to mark 1859-60. Res. 15. Michler's line; and m the second they authorized the governor to send an agent to Eng land to collect record and documentary evidence " tending to ascertain and establish the true lines of boundary between Virginia and the States of North Carolina, Tennessee and Maryland." From 26 this it would appear that they considered the boundary question still open. At all events, the ratification required by the act was not given, and Maryland was once more remitted to her original rights, her charter boundary and its acceptance by the Virginia Constitutional Convention. The outbreak of the war in 1861, and its results, changed the status of the question. The State of West Virginia was separated from Virginia, and in her boundaries (which were designated by county lines) were included those counties in which the disputed territory lies. It was with West Virginia, therefore, that the question would have to be settled. The Legislature of West Virginia, at the session w. va. of 1868, authorized the Governor to ^j' appoint a commission to ascertain the line ch. 175. between West Virginia and Maryland, commencing at the Fairfax Stone, and running north to the Pennsylvania line, and to communicate with the Governor of Maryland, with the view of having a joint survey made. The reason of this action was the fact that Michler's line having been found more favorable to Maryland than the old provisional, or Deakin's line, West Virginia took the ground that as Virginia had never ratified Michler's line, West Virginia was bound to nothing, and the question was still open. 27 In 1884 the Maryland Assembly passed a resolu tion by which, after the statement that there was difficulty m ascertaining the 1884. exact location of Mason and Dixon's line, owing to the absence of marks, the members of Congress from Maryland are requested to use their influence to obtain an appropriation from the Federal government " for the purpose of re-survey ing and locating the said Mason and Dixon's line by marking said Mason and Dixon's line with suit able stone monuments, with the letters M. and V. between the States of Maryland and Virginia, M. and P. between the States of Maryland and Pennsyl vania, M. and D. between Maryland and Delaware, commencing at the Fairfax Stone at the head waters of the north branch of the Potomac, thence running northwardly with Mason and Dixon's line until it intersects the eastwardly line dividing the States of Pennsylvania and Maryland " — and so forth. As the action contemplated by this resolution was, on the face of it, impracticable, your Committee have not thought it necessary to investigate what further steps, if any, were taken in the matter. In 1886 a resolution was passed in the Maryland Assembly to the effect that as Michler's Md ^ line had not yet been adopted by West me. J Pes. 6. Virginia, the Governor of Maryland should be requested to bring the subject to the 28 attention of the Governor of West Virginia, asking him to bring it before the Legislature of that State for such action as they might deem fitting. In the next year the Assembly of West Virginia w.va.Acts, passed an act confirming Michler's line, „ 18.87' but not unconditionally. The act was not See Appen- Committee. APPENDIX. APPENDIX A. " Totam illam partem peninsule sive chersonesus jacentem Pat. Roll, in partibus Americe inter oceanum ex oriente et ' jjj ' sin urn de Chessopeake ab occidente a residuo ejus- 2594. dem per rectarn lineam a promontorio sive capite terre vocate Watkins Point juxta sinum predictum prope fluvium de Wighco scituato ab occidente usque ad magnum oceanum in plaga orientali ductam divisam et inter metam illam a meridie usque ad partem illam estuarii de De la Ware ab aquilone que subjacet quadragesimo gradui latitudinis sep- tentrionalis ab equinoctiali ubi terminator Nova Anglia totum- que illius terre tractum infra metas subscriptas videlicet trans- eundo a dicto estuario vocato Delaware Baye recta linea per gradum predictum usque ad verum meridianum primi fontis fluminis de Pattowomack deinde vergendo versus meridiem ad ulteriorem dicti fluminis ripam et eam sequendo qua plaga occidentalis et meridionalis spectat usque ad locum quendam appellatum Cinquak prope ejusdem fluminis ostium scituatum ubi in prefatum sinum de Chessopeak evolvitur ac inde per lineam brevissimam usque ad predictum promontorium de Watkins Point." 33 34 APPENDIX B. From Frederick, Lord Baltimore's, Instructions to Gov. Horatio Sharpe, 1753. " Whereas the Right Honorable Lord Viscount Fairfax has a grant of a large tract of land lying and running Md. Arch. alone: the banks of Patowmack River on the Vir- **S- . ... Lib#' ginia side, and whereas I am informed the powers J.R.&U.S., of government in Virginia have taken the liberty p' to ascertain the bounds and limits of his said Lordship's grant running along the banks of the said river, which river, to the further bank thereof, is limited to me with its soil and water, and is a boundary between my Province of Maryland and the Province of Virginia unto the fountain head of the said river ; and whereas I am informed that commissioners have pro ceeded therein, and instead of their stopping at South Branch, which runs from the first fountain of Patowmack River, one of the boundaries of Maryland, have crossed to a branch run ning north, whereby their endeavours are to give limits and boundary marks prescribed by my royal charter, subjecting me to great loss of country ; and whereas it being not known to me that my predecessor was made a party to the settlement of such boundaries by the said commissioners ; and were it so, such settlement would be invalid by virtue of my father's marriage-articles, he being only tenant for life, with reserva tion to me as tenant in tail ; I therefore desire and require of you, as soon as possibly you can, to get intelligence how such boundaries have been or are settled by the said commissioners with regard to Lord Fairfax and his grant ; and at the same time, if opportunity serves you, you may communicate to Lord Fairfax that I am very desirous of settling proper limits con- 35 elusive between him and me in regard to my Province of Maryland and his grant in Virginia; and in the mean time you must make or have made a good look out, and warning given to such persons as shall venture to settle in such dis puted boundary between my Province of Maryland and the Province of Virginia under the said grant to Lord Fairfax." APPENDIX C. Sharpe to Fairfax. [Sept. 1753.] Lord Baltimore was pleased to charge me Md. Arch. wit^ an m(Auiry into tue tr"e meridian and place Sharpe Cor. of the fountain head of Potowmack. The best '"''' information I have hitherto been able to procure gives me reason to believe there has been a mistake in fixing the spring head to the North Branch, since the length, with other circumstances, more properly denotes the Southern Branch, commonly called Wappacomo, to be the main and principal course of that river. I am the more willing to be persuaded of the truth of this representation from the consid erable advantage that will accrue to your Lordship. That branch, I am informed, has never been thoroughly explored and traced to its source ; but I flatter myself with having your Lordship's concurrence for such an examination into its course, length, width, and depth as may bring this matter to a nearer ("degree" of certainty ; and if that should appear to be the fountain head of Patowmeck River, I shall not question but your Lordship will be for taking such measures as may ascer tain the mutual limits of the two Proprietorships, agreeable to the direction and true intention of their respective charters." 36 Fairfax to Sharpe. "Frederick, Septemtt the 24th, 1753. "Sir: Yours I received by Mr. Young, by which I perceive Lord Baltimore designs to dispute with this Province which is the head spring of Patowmeck, the south or north branch as run out by the commissioners between his Majesty and me in the year 1736. " I am intirely [of the opinion ?] that the South wouH be much to my advantage, and therefore think it improper for me to appear therein, and that' the Governor of Virginia and your excellency should transact that affair. If his Lordship should obtain his demand, I must insist upon a hew line between his Majesty and me to the Southward." Apjiertd-vx- D. 37 APPENDIX E. Extract from the Royal proclamation of Oct. 7, 1763. "And whereas it is just and reasonable, and essential to Our interest and the security of Our colonies that the Md Arch several nations or tribes of Indians with whom Ms- We are connected, and who live under Our protec- ' u. s. tion, should not be molested or disturbed in the p-379- possession of such parts of Our dominion and territories as, not having been ceded to, or purchased by, Us, are reserved to them or any of them, as their hunting-grounds, We do therefore, with the advice of Our Privy Council, declare it to be Our Royal will and pleasure that no Governor or Com mander-in-Chief in auy of Our Colonies of Quebec, East Florida, or West Florida, do presume, upon any pretense whatever, to grant warrants of survey or pass any patents for land beyond the bounds of their respective governments as described in their commissions ; as also that no Governor or Commander-in-Chief in any of Our other Colonies or Planta tions in America do presume for the present, and until Our further pleasure be known, to grant warrants of survey or pass patents for any lands beyond the heads or sources of any of the rivers which fall into the Atlantic ocean from the west and north-west." 38 APPENDIX F. Act passed March 5, 1833. Commonwealth of Virginia. Chap. 32. An Act to settle the western limits of this State, and the dividing and boundary line between this State and the Commonwealth of Maryland. 1 . Be it Enacted by the General Assembly of the Common wealth of Virginia : That the Governor be, and he is hereby authorized, to appoint three Commissioners on the part of this State to meet such Commissioners as may be appointed for the same purpose by the Commonwealth of Maryland, to settle and adjust, by mutual compact between the two governments, the western limits of this State, and the dividing and boundary line between this State and the Commonwealth of Maryland, to commence at the Fairfax stone, or at the first fountain of the Cohongoroota or north branch of the Potomac river, and to run a due north course to intersect the line between this State and the State of Pennsylvania. If, however, the Common wealth of Maryland shall fail to appoint Commissioners, then, and in that event, the commissioners appointed by the Gov ernor of this Commonwealth, or any two of them, shall run and mark the said line according to the provisions of this bill : and the Commissioners appointed as aforesaid are required to report their proceedings in virtue of their appointment and authority to the General Assembly of this State at the session next after the same shall have been concluded, for confirma tion or rejection. [The remaining sections provide for re-granting lands "after the confirmation of the settlement as aforesaid;" for the 39 employment of a surveyor and assistants and their payment, as also the payment of the commissioners ; and that the act shall be in force from the time of its passage.] APPENDIX G. Acts West Virginia, 1887, Extra Session. Chapter I. An Act to confirm and establish a part of the boundary line between the State of W. Va. and the State of Md. (Passed May 3, 1887.) Be it Enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia: 1. That the boundary line as run and marked by N. Michler, U. S. engineer, in the year one thousand eight hun dred and fifty-nine, under the direction of A. W. McDonald, Commissioner on the part of Virginia, and Thos. J. Lee, Commissioner on the part of Maryland, from the Fairfax Stone to the Pennsylvania line, between the county of Preston, W. Va., and the county of Alleghany, now Garrett, Maryland, be and the same is hereby approved and confirmed as the true boundary line between the State of West Virginia and the State of Maryland. 2. But this act shall not take effect until and unless the State of Maryland shall pass an act or acts confirming and rendering valid all entries, grants, patents and titles from the Commonwealth of Virginia, to any person or persons, to lands situate and lying between the new Maryland line hereby estab lished and the old Maryland line heretofore claimed by Vir ginia and West Virginia, to the same extent and like legal effect, as though said old Maryland line were hereby confirmed and established. Approved May 6th, 1887. 40 APPENDIX H. Note on Faulkner's Report. An opinion having got abroad that Faulkner's report to the Governor of Virginia in 1832, Was in some way decisive of this question, it may be as well to dispose of it here. It is probably traceable to a letter published by him in 1875, in which he says that the evidence he submitted had such " over whelming" effect on the Legislature of Maryland, that they at once dismissed the suit in the Supreme Court and aban doned the claim. Faulkner's report consists partly of well-known facts, some times incorrectly cited (for example he misquotes the Maryland Charter and founds a long argument on the misquotation) ; partly of documents relating to the adjustment of the bounds between Fairfax and Virginia, which have little bearing on the question at issue, and partly of his personal opinions on the matter, which have, if possible, less. As matter of fact, the record shows as we have seen, that the Maryland Legislature, so far from being "overwhelmed," or abandoning any claim, reasserted the rights of the State, and declared that they saw nothing in the documents laid before them to induce them to vary from the course deter mined on. But, out of courtesy to Virginia, they would withdraw the suit, as they had learned from high quarters that that alone stood in the way of an amicable settlement, which was all they desired. This preservation photocopy was made at BookLab, Inc., in compliance with copyright law. The paper is Weyerhaeuser Cougar Opaque Natural, which exceeds ANSI Standard Z39.48-1984. 1992 YA L E?