I I |i Ii ii! : " :¦.'¦¦ -r- '."': : ¦ 7- ¦ .-¦ |li YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 1944 HISTORY OF DRACUT 0aIcu 5$ Uwvavl* HISTORY of DRACUT MASSACHUSETTS CALLED BY THE INDIANS AUGUMTOOCOOKE AND BEFORE INCORPORATION, THE WILDERNESSE NORTH OF THE MERRIMAC. FIRST PERMANENT SETTLEMENT IN 1669 AND INCORPORATED AS A TOWN IN 1701 By Silas R. Coburn "History baa a great office, to make the past intelligent to the present for the guidance of the future." Charles Knight 1922 Press of the Courier-Citizen Co. lowell, mass. Copyrighted, 1922 By Silas R. Coburn DEDICATION TO THE PEOPLE OF DRACUT, MASS. and to all Descendants of those Sturdy Pioneers who were the Early Settlers in this Vicinity wherever their lot is cast TXbts memorial is Dedicated with Respect and Affection by SILAS ROGER COBURN TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ix Chapter I — Settlement of Dracut 1 II — Period of the Glacial Movement 20 III— Indian History 30 IV — Early Grants and Allotments of Re served Land 65 V — Establishment of the Province Line .... 97 VI— Early Wars 108 VII— The Revolutionary War 117 VIII— Shay 's Rebellion and War of 1812 162 IX — War of the Rebellion, Indian and Spanish Wars 168 X — War with Germany and Her Allies .... 176 XI— Church History 182 XII— Mills and Industries 210 Including Woolen, Cotton, Carpet and Paper Mills, Saw and Grist Mills, Fulling and Carding Mills, Tanneries and numerous mis cellaneous industries. XIII — Schools, Libraries and Lyceums 225 XIV — Roads, Ferries and Bridges 241 XV — Cemeteries, Physicians and Tragedies . . 274 XVI — Mines, Quarries and Fisheries 285 XVII — Electric Service, Dracut Water Supply System 294 XVIII— Survey of Roads 298 By Hon. B. F. Varnum. XIX — Miscellaneous Subjects 312 XX — Biography and Genealogy 364 Concluding Remarks 434 INTRODUCTION THE HISTORY OF DRACUT is now presented to the public in accordance with the request of the citizens of the town for a history which would embody in one volume the various subjects which relate to its existence. I make no claim to any special knowledge of events or superior ability to place them upon record. No writer of a work of this nature can prepare the material from a personal knowledge of the facts, for the participants have, with a few exceptions, gone "To the pale realms of shade, where each must take his chamber in the silent halls of death," and even their existence has been forgotten. Facts and information have been gathered from different sources. The records of the town have been carefully studied, though as the town clerks of the earlier years did not realize the need of a full account of the transactions of the town, it has been difficult to record the proceedings of those years. No record of the first ten years of the town's existence has been preserved, and whatever events of that period are here recorded have been obtained from other sources. The Registry of Deeds and probate records of Middlesex County have been examined and much information from this source supplements the records of the town. The State archives have been examined and material relating to the years before Dracut received a name has been gathered. Valuable assistance has been rendered by members of Dracut families who have preserved the business papers and letters of earlier days. Too often these have been considered of no value and have been destroyed. To the historian many of these seemingly worthless papers have proved invaluable. These old documents yellow with age, often nearly illegible,, in handwriting strange and cramped, make clear many difficult problems in historical matters. Old letters, old account books and old diaries have contributed facts obtainable in no other way. The residence of a lifetime in or near Dracut has assisted materially in the compilation of this work. The many changes wrought in these years are thus recorded from personal recollection, and acquaintanceship i HISTORY OF DRAOUT with the old residents has furnished opportunity for storing the memory with their reminiscences. These facts have been verified as far as possible by personal observation which has extended over several years, as I long ago realized the value of a town history and commenced collecting information, hoping that in the future some one would weave it into a book and thus retain it in a permanent form. No history of Dracut has ever been published from which to learn of the proceedings of earlier days and much which is of value has been lost. As the present generation passes away and traditions are forgotten, these collections will be of value to those who take our places as citizens of the Town of Dracut. In the collection of these facts I have been ably assisted by many who have been interested in the production of a history and I take this opportunity to acknowledge their kindness. I feel especially indebted to the late Edwin M. Currier, formerly of this town, as many a problem has been solved by him which, only for his patient and careful study, would remain unsolved. Much of the success attained by these records is due to his unremitting labor. I am also indebted to Walter McK. Draycot of Lynn Creek, B. C, Canada, for information relating to the Dracuts of England which have given the town its name and which is the only Dracut in the United States. A study of the early records of England has enabled him to trace the history of the name back to the time of the Norman Conquest in the year 1066, and to the Roman occupation B. C. 54. I acknowledge valuable assistance rendered by Miss Elizabeth Coburn of Varnum Avenue, whose collection- of old papers furnished information which could be gathered from no other source. Many facts relating to Indian history and the Revolution have been found among old papers owned and carefully preserved by Mrs. Clarence G. Coburn, now residing in Pawtucketville, and cheerfully placed at my disposal; also to Mr. W. T. S. Bartlett and Mr. J. M. Wilson for contributions to the Indian History. The trustees of the Dracut Town Library have assisted in the work by advice in relation to publication of the book. The financial assistance which makes it possible to place the history before the public has been given by the citizens of the town, INTRODUCTION xi who at the annual town meeting held February 2nd of the past year, 1921, voted to defray the expense and appropriated money for this purpose, appointing the Library Trustees a committee to attend to the publication. I wish to thank all who by furnishing information or by words of encouragement have assisted me in this work, which is the result of twenty-eight years' study. I do not assert that the work in every respect is absolutely correct. Errors will creep in however careful a writer may be, and I trust that the reader will be lenient and will understand the difficulties to be encountered in the preparation of a work of this nature. There are, to some extent, facts recorded in this work with which the present generation is acquainted, but I believe that as household utensils are placed upon the shelves of a museum for the instruction of future generations who will know of them only by tradition, so the same principle should apply in the preparation of a history. The present generation will have passed away, but the future generations will have the same desire to study the acts of the former years which are possessed by us. The peculiar manner in which the early documents were written with the quaint spelling and abundance of capital letters which preceded a general rule for their use has been retained. It should be borne in mind that this was not the result of ignorance on the part of the writers, but was the style then in use. No doubt .the style of spelling in the time of Chaucer and Spencer would present the same difficulties to our fore fathers which theirs does to us, and in one or two centuries those persons who examine the writings of the present day will probably find as marked a contrast as exists at present between the style now in use and that of a century ago. The English language of the time six centuries ago can hardly be recognized as the language of the present day and no one can predict with any certainty what its future may be. My object in writing this history has been to instruct and entertain the readers. The work has been performed without expectation of pecuniary reward. The formation of new acquaintances, the study of the works of nature and the satisfaction to be derived from the knowledge that those who xii HISTORY OF DRACUT study this history will be led to take a deeper interest in the early days of the town's existence has provided ample compensation. The amount I receive from the town I consider a gratuity and wish to extend to my fellow-citizens my thanks for the gift. After twenty-eight years of study and preparation this history is now placed before the public, and it is my earnest desire that the lessons of patience, patriotism and good citizenship taught us by our ancestors may not be forgotten, but may be transmitted from generation to generation. 0aZ&S Jf}. U- 9 * z z ^ 111 4 m \_ ~ — a a, — -j s = s rt o d, Q. U Z WAR WITH GERMANY AND HER ALLIES 177 mark created the German Empire and included all under one government. In 1914, Germany declared war against France, having as allies, Austria, Turkey and Bulgaria. The aUies of France were England, Russia and Belgium and before it closed on November 11, 1918, a large part of the countries of the world were in a state of war. The United States remained neutral until 1917, when repeated insults by Germany and the success of the Central Powers, as Germany and her allies were caUed, obliged the United States to declare war, April 6, 1917, and the arrival in Europe of the American soldiers was the cause of the defeat of the Central Powers and the overthrow of the GermaU Empire. Names op Soldiers prom Dracut Who Served in This War John F. Briscoe Antonio Bernier Ernest Boivineval George E. Benoit Isadore Boucher Louis Bernier Israel Boulet Adelard H. Bourgeois Robert C. Blakely Lawrence Brennan Paul L. Burden Frank S. Burden Charles E. Bixby Arthur H. Cashin Ralph H. Coburn Rodney C. Coburn Everett 0. Coburn Napoleon Cardinal Z. Prince Coburn Robert Campbell Leroy Caverly Daniel J. CoUins Thomas Collins Chester J. Canney James F. Costello Forrest H. Calhoun Charles F. Clevette William H. Cullinan, Jr. Wesley Crosby John Ciesla George Decelle Augustus L. Dutton Arthur DeceUe Leander P. Davidson Cecil P. Dodge EUe Dufour Joseph E. Dufour Alfred Dufour Anthony Drouin Lynwood D. Foster Carminio Fascoine Ernest Firth Archie Fox Lester H. Fox 178 HISTORY OF DRACUT George Garner Armand J. Guenard Saul Joseph Gordon Henry J. Grenier Edward Girard Edmund H. Gunther John T. Gorman John Gendreau William Gendreau Roderique Gendreau Arthur C. Gunther Raymond Gendreau David A. Hanlon Everett Hayward Harvey R. Hayward Herman L. Hodge Royal K. Hayes Roland Hill Harold Hill John Harrison Harold F. Harrison Samuel Newell Harris Charles Harwood Thomas Higgins John J. Higgins Frank Hobbs Clifford R. Harvey Paul Lockhart Hutchinson Stewart Frank Hunt Harold D. Hutchinson Galen H. Harvey Edward Irving Johnson Charles E. Jones James P. Kiernan Florian J. King Roy H. Linseott Jacob Lachut Joseph N. Laflamme Walter E. Leslie Joseph A. Lessard Alexander Lessard Arthur Levesque Romeo Methot Hugh Fred Maguire Henry J. Murphy Harry McLellan Howard V. McCoy Harold McAnney Joseph Francis McNamara Arthur C. Mitchell Ernest Mooney George Mozley Charles Nelson Herbert 0. Nichols John Ouimmette George O'Malley Theodore Perry Hector Pilotte Wilson H. Pollard William Perreault Waldo N. Pierce Benoit Poirrer Albert L. Pelton Elzear Perry Alfred Perreault William Robertson John J. Roughan Thomas B. Roughan Caleb F. Rogers Jesse Richardson Roscoe Richardson WAR WITH GERMANY AND HER ALLIES 179 Asa Richardson Delmer E. Richardson Arthur Gilbert Richardson Leo Roth David Scott William W. Scott Benno W. Shafter Lionel Stewart Manuel P. Sauris Alexander M. Shanks Michael F. Sullivan Leo Sherlock Edgar Sykes Hollis C. Simpson Daniel SuUivan Raymond R. Stevens Edwin Shore FrankUn W. Thomas George Touissaint Charles Therrien, . Jr. Herbert Taylor WilUam H. Taff Edward H. Taff Joseph C. Taff Alfred J. Tremblay Harry W. Thomas Richard E. Udell Percy R. Wilson Edward Walsh Frank R. Walters Alexander Wilson George Leo Wayne Arthur L. Witherall Benjamin WitheraU Raymond A. Willett Edgar A. Yates Richard Young John Zarnowski These men served in the different organizations which com posed the American army. They were found in the infantry, artiUery, and batteries, and were in the navy, the quartermas ter's department and the aviation corps. Their duties, while primarily those of fighting men, included clerical work, remov ing the wounded in ambulances, placing in position telephone wires, police duty and serving as cooks and bakers. They were in the hardest battles and manifested the same spirit which animated our ancestors whenever called upon to defend our rights and Uberties. Among the many organizations, in which were Dracut men, mention may be made of the 319th Regt. Field Artillery, which was engaged in the section caUed the Argonne Meuse Forest. This battle was one in which the enemy was defeated and its influence was felt in the confidence which it gave to the allied forces and the depression which followed the defeat of the Cen- 180 HISTORY OF DRACUT tral Powers. At St. Mihiel the regiment was at the front and by skiUful placing in position of the cannon rendered valuable assistance and contributed to the success of the engagement. The official history of the 82d divison refers in terms of praise to this 319th Regiment of Artillery. Dracut men were also mem bers of Battery F, 102d Field Artillery, which composed a part of the 26th Division U. S. A. In a book entitled "Our Miracle Battery," written by George Mozley, a Dracut man and mem ber of Battery F, incidents are recorded relating to the engage ments at Chemin Des Dames, Seichprey-Xivray, St. Mihiel, Meuse-Argonne, Chateau Thierry, and other places. Mr. Mozley has given permission to the copying of extracts from this in teresting book which will in a measure convey to the readers how the battles of the present day are fought. ' ' The next day, February 5th, as we rode along in the train we noticed old trenches, barbed wire, etc., and just about dark we arrived at Pommiers, where we unloaded. It was then very dark and we moved over the roads until we arrived at some old barracks, formerly German property, about seven miles from the front Une. After taking care of our horses, we retired for a few hours' sleep with the exception of those who were given guard duty. The next morning we could hear the guns booming in the distance. We put branches, etc., on our guns, to camouflage them. We were ordered to keep out of sight for a number of planes were flying around and some of them might be Germans. "On February 8th, while we were at the same place, we noticed some American Infantry-men coming up the road. They were Co. M of the 104th Infantry. As a large number of them were formerly of the 6th Regt. of Massachusetts, we found many acquaintances. On that afternoon we went to a nearby ruined village, where to test our gas masks, we put them on and went into a cave where there was gas. "Early the next morning, February 9th, we left for the front. About noon we noticed some planes at which the French anti-aircraft guns were firing, so we knew that they were German planes. Suddenly we heard a shrill noise and then an explosion. What was it? We moved along quickly and then one of our WAR WITH GERMANY AND HER ALLIES 181 officers said that the noise we heard was a shell, no doubt di rected at us by the German aviator. "On Monday, February 11, 1918, the whole Battery fired its first shot at the enemy in the World War. We now had an opportunity of seeing what the enemy seemed to take pleasure in doing — destroying, for we noticed orchards everywhere where the trees had been sawed a few feet from the ground and toppled over. The churches, gravestones, etc., had been smashd to dust. * * * Enemy planes came flying around the Echelon as well as the position to get information. Guards were stationed at both places to notify in such cases and also to notify in case of gas. When the enemy was over at night, it was a wonderful sight to see the searchlights, of the French, cross each other in the sky, endeavoring to locate the plane, that shots might be directed at it. On certain nights a large number of planes would go over and we were told that this was one of the routes the enemy took to bomb Paris." Of Seichprey we learn that "all night the sheUing con tinued and at 3.30, on the morning of the 20th, the enemy came over the top to get Seichprey. Gas was everywhere. The guns boomed on both sides and the Battery fired for ten solid hours. All the high explosives had to be used. Each piece fired 950 rounds, when the orders came to pile up all shrapnel, there being 50 left per gun. At '409' the guns had to be pushed out so as to cover the proper places. Consequently there was no protection. All the wires were cut and the Special Detail men were trying to repair them. The last report over the wires was 'Germans enter Seichprey — still coming.' * * * When communication was finally established all batteries of the regiment received orders to fire at one particular spot. We later heard that the reason for it was that two mobile batteries had been drawn up and were doing a great deal of damage. They were annihilated by our regimental fire." CHAPTER XI CHURCH HISTORY UNDER the Colonial law the inhabitants of every newly settled town were obliged to maintain a minister and have regular religious services as soon as their circumstances would permit. It was one of the conditions of the incorporation of Dracut ' ' That the inhabitants of said land assist in the mainte nance of the ministry at the town of Chelmsford as at present they do until they are provided with a minister as the law directs. ' ' "A church officer of whatever degree was an officer only of his own church. According to the primitive doctrine and prac tice of New England, no man was a clergyman in any sense either before his election by a particular church or after his relinquishment of the special trust so conferred. And even while in office he was a layman to all the world except his own con gregation and was not competent to exercise any clerical func tions elsewhere. In the earliest times, ministers were ordained, not by other ministers, but by officers of the church which elected him or, when it had no officers, then by some of its private members. No marriage by ministers was legal, but a civil con tract was made before a magistrate." The First Congregational Church Among the earliest records of the town we find an attempt to provide a house of worship. Under date of March 6, 1711, is recorded, "At a general town meeting unanimously agreed by a generall vote for building of a meeting house. Also by a general town meeting voted and made choice of the West end of Flag meadow hill to be the yard to set the meeting house on." For some reason unrecorded the action was not completed, for we find the following on record : "Dracut December ye 8th day in the year 1714. At a gen eral Town meeting of the Inhabitants that was warned by the CHURCH HISTORY 183 selectmen of the town for to meet and to see in what manner to build a meeting house for our town and to begene it this year. And it was granted by the aforesaid town meeting that the meeting house should be 30 feet longe and 25 feet wide. Also it was granted six pounds of money to be paid towards the building of said house. 30 pounds in the next year in July insueing, 30 pounds in the month of July 1716. Also it is granted for four cattle and a man a day five shillings and so according, and two shillings one man a day for getting timber, also it is granted Thomas Coburn, Ezra Colburn, Joseph Colburn, Thomas Varnum, John Varnum should be trustees for the above said town to hire and agree with men for to build said meeting house above named & give a true account to the town of their ex penses to get the work done as cheap as they can. This is a true account done at a general Town meeting. Joseph Colburn Samuel Colburn Selectmen. ' ' The next year it was voted to build the house larger, two feet more in length, three feet in width and a shed twenty feet in length. April 11, 1715: "Voted to purchase 1 Barrel of cider and such a quantity of rum as the trustees may see fit to be used while building the meeting house." As we read of the small amount of money which was appropriated we conclude that much of the labor would be contributed by the men who would be benefitted by a building in the vicinity. There was an abun dance of lumber of Uttle value, it was near John Varnum 's saw mill at the Pawtucket falls, and but little money would be needed aside from that used to pay expert workmen to oversee the work. The next year it was again voted to set the building near Flag Meadow Hill and the boundaries of the lot defined. The location was on the south side of Varnum avenue and ad joining on the east the homestead of the late Dea. Abel Coburn. This piece of land has been known as the meeting house lot. An account of early customs relates: "An important and interesting adjunct of the meeting house, in some parts of the country was the Sabba' Day House. Comfort being carefully 184 HISTORY OF DRACUT shut out of the meeting house was only then rudely provided for in such subordinate structures. The Sabba ' Day House was a family affair, generaUy comprising but a single apartment, perhaps fifteen feet square with windows and a fireplace. It was very plainly and sparsely furnished. Chairs for the old people and benches for the children stood around the walls and a table in the center might hold the Bible and a few religious books and pamphlets, while at one side shelves contained dishes for cooking and eating. Sometimes the Sabba' Day House was mounted above a shed in which the horse could be sheltered. A group of such cabins standing about the meeting house added not a little to the picturesqueness of the spot and their use con duced greatly to the convenience and comfort of Sabbath wor ship especially in winter." Many families owned foot stoves which may be seen in museums. These were smaU perforated tin boxes enclosed in a square frame and carried in the hand like a dinner box, which would be fiUed with hardwood coals either at the Sabba' Day House or at a neighbor 's fireplace. Besides furnishing coals, the Sabba' Day House provided a place where the cold dinners were eaten and where the housewives could exchange ideas relating to housekeeping and the men discuss farm topics and the politi cal situation. The oldest women in the family were entitled to the use of the footstove while the children would rap their feet together to promote circulation. If there was only one footstove in the family the dog would be brought in and the younger members would receive some degree of warmth by holding their feet on him. At the annual town meeting one of the offices to be filled was that of dog thumper whose duty it was to keep the dogs from fighting during the services. The introduction of stoves for the purpose of warming the meeting house was strongly opposed but when once admitted the Sabba' Day Houses disappeared. The pews were square with seats on the four sides. A door was attached to each one and the seats, boards without cushions, were fastened to the side with hinges and raised when the people were standing. Only the aged or feeble were allowed to remain seated during the long prayer and at its close the children would replace the board seats, which had been raised, making as much noise as possible, much CHURCH HISTORY 185 to the dismay of the elders. A flight of steps led to the pulpit. In front of the pulpit and facing the congregation could be seen the deacon's seat, while in the large galleries were seated the singers, the indigent and colored people and famiUes who could not be seated in the audience room. Above the pulpit was the sounding board, bell shaped, and designed to deflect the sound of the minister's voice down to the congregation. Such, in brief, is the description of the meeting houses of a century ago and there was little variation from the barn-like appearance outwardly. When a minister was considered a proper man for the place he would be settled for life and pastorates extending over a period of sixty years were not unusual. Church attendance was obUgatory and non-attendants were brought into court and fined. The foUowing is the record of the grand jury in 1730 re lating to this matter: "Middl ss At His Majestys Court of General Sessions of the Peace holden at Charlestown for and within the County of Middlx on the Second Tuesday of December being the eighth day of said month Anno Dom: Seventeen hundred and thirty In the fourth years of His Majestys Reign By His Majestys justices of said court, James Richardson of Dracut Husband man as Principal in Five pounds and John Colburn of Dracut Husbandman Surety in the like Sum of Five pounds became indebted to the King to be levyed on their several Goods or Chatties Conditioned that he the said James Richardson & James Richardson Jun. his son Shall appear at the next court of General Sessions of the Peace for Middlx to answer to the Presentment of the Grand Jurors for not attending Publick Worship of God." In 1711 a Mr. Hail or Hale conducted services for a time and received the sum of "43 shillings 4 pence." The same year a caU was extended to Mr. Amos Cheever to become the pastor at an annual salary of fifty pounds with a promise of increased pay if the town was able to give it. He was to have eighty pounds allowed him for the purpose of erecting a dwelling house. The original letter in which this offer was made is in existence. A 186 HISTORY OF DRACUT similar offer was presented to Mr. Wigglesworth, who also de- cUned to accept it. It is noticeable that no title was prefixed to these names. October 15, 1718, the town "mad choise of Mr. Mackgger to settle in Dracut to prech the Gospel and to do the whole work of a settled minister; and likewise voted to give to Mr. MacGregor 65 pounds for his salary for the first four years. ' ' Rev. James MacGregor, with several families of his parish in the north of Ireland, had arrived in America that year. While endeavoring to find a suitable place in which to settle, Rev. Mr. MacGregor came to Dracut and received the caU to become their pastor. But his duties to his own people forbade his acceptance although he consented to perform the duties as pastor for a time and taught the town school in the winter of 1718-19. The fol lowing May he removed, with his associates, to Londonderry, N. H., where they became the first settlers of the town. In 1720, a call was extended to Rev. Thomas Parker, at that time only 19 years of age, but who so strongly impressed the people with his ability and fitness to perform the duties of the office that his youth was not considered as unfitting him to become the pastor. His reply was as follows : "Chelmsford, Jan. 30, 1720. To the inhabitants of the town of Dracut : I received your vote the 3d of this instant January by the hands of Capt. Varnum and Lieut. Hildreth, wherein I under stand you have unanimously made choice of me to be your set tled minister. I have perused and considered your offer also understanding your earnest desire that I should settle amongst you. I can find no fault with what you have been pleased to offer and I do therefore accept the same provided you do pay me quarterly. As you have been unanimous in your choice so I hope you will always endeavor to live in peace and unanimity, that there be found a spirit of peace in each of you. I also beg your prayers to Almighty God for me, that I may prove a faithful minister of Christ and instrumental in saving many souls, that you may sit quietly and contentedly under my min istry, that I may have a comfortable prospect of your being benefitted thereby, and that you and I may so believe and manage CHURCH HISTORY 187 ourselves that we may meet with comfort in this life and with peace at death ; and that we may lift up our heads with joy at the last day shall be the continual fervent prayer of me, one of the un worthiest of God's ministers. Thomas Parker. "The action of the town is as folk>ws: At a general town meeting made choice of Rev. Thomas Parker as their minister and voted to give him a call to settle at eighty pounds yearly for his salary. Voted that Captain Var num, Quartermaster Coburn and Ephraim Hildreth carry the vote to Mr. Parker and that Quartermaster Coburn be paid six pounds to provide for ye ordination." His letter of acceptance shows the spirit in which he entered upon the work and which enabled him to render such satisfactory service that he remained with the Church until his death, which occurred March 18, 1765, his term of service being forty-four years. Before his burial the town voted "To buy Madame Parker a morning suite also to buy six Rings for the Baires for sd Desest." At the time of his death there was a small burial place between Varnum avenue and the river which is still in existence and here he was laid to rest by those whom he had served so many years. His grave was marked and after a cen tury had elapsed his remains were removed to the Woodbine cemetery on Old Meadow road. As the town increased in population and more families set tled in the central and eastern portions the location of the meet ing house became unsatisfactory, and in 1745 a town meeting was called for the purpose of selecting another site. There existed a great diversity of opinion as each section desired the location of the building in their vicinity. They finally decided "to build a meeting house for ye public worship of God, 45 feet in length and 35 feet in breadth and 23 feet between the plates and sills and that said meeting house shall be set on ye northwesterly side of ye Great road, on the easterly side of Mr. Nathan Simonds land near said road and near the easterly line of said Simonds land. ' ' Nathan Simonds was at that time the owner of one half of the 500 acres of the Indian Reservation, therefore the location must have been not far from Riverside street, then called the 188 HISTORY OF DRACUT Great road. The site was unsatisfactory and on December 16th of the same year it was voted "to build the meeting house 44 by 36 & 24 feet in the clear on the high land between Col. Var nums house and the Old Meadow Path." This was Joseph Varnum who lived at the garrison house near the navy yard village and the location chosen seems to have been further north than the one chosen the preceding May. Neither site was satisfactory to all parties and no further action was taken until February 10, 1747-8, when the town again voted to build a meeting house and "to sett it at the Southwest corner of John Bowers his homestead by a Great majority in writing. ' ' The Bowers homestead was at the northeast corner of Hovey square, opposite the Hovey house. This action caused the town to be divided into factions and a controversy com menced which was so bitter that the inhabitants of the west part of the town appealed to the General Court by a petition in which they rehearsed the past actions of the town in building the first house, settling a minister, etc., and set forth the recent votes of the town in regard to the different sites selected. The situation wiU be better understood if the petition is recorded. Omitting the legal formalities the substance of the petition is : "27 May 1745 the town did vote and agree upon a place for Rebuilding the said meeting house about a mile to the northward from the 1st meeting house. That notwithstanding said votes the Inhabits have called another meeting and on the 10th of Feb. last did by a majority of votes grant that a meeting house should be built at the Southwest corner of the John Bowers home stead at least a mile eastward from ye place agreed upon ye 27 of May as aforesaid and further granted two hundred pounds of the last Emission [papermoney] to be laid out in building the same which last mentioned place is upward of two miles eastward from the first meeting house" and further prayed that a committee be appointed "to view and appoint the most reason able place for a meeting house. ' ' The petitioners state that they believe by the action of the town that two meeting houses are to be built at the towns charge without separating the inhabitants and if so they request that they may be divided into two towns or parishes. CHURCH HISTORY 189 The petitioners John Varnum John Littlehale Abraham Varnum Edward Coburn Josiah Coburn Thomas Varnum Samuel Winn Caleb Parker Ephraim Colburn Edward Coburn Jr. were John Littlehale Jr. Robert Lindsay James Richardson John WilUams Joseph Colburn Ezra Littlehale Ezekiel Richardson Jr. Aaron Coburn Abraham Coburn Daniel Coburn These signers can be identified as residents of the west part of the town. In answer to the petition the General Court ordered April 7, 1748, "that Col. Richards and Mr. Brewer with such as shall be joined by the Hon. Board be a Committee to view the Situation & Circumstances of the Town of Dracut at the charge of the petitioners & report what they judge proper for this Court to do in this Petition and all proceedings respect ing building a meeting house are stayed in the meantime." A counter petition was presented April 15, 1748 by those citizens who favored the placing of the building on the Bowers' lot. It was signed by: Jacob Coburn Samuel Varnum Levi Hildreth Simeon Colburn Kendall Parker David Parker WiUiam Hill Stephen Russell Jonathan Crosby Robert Wright Josiah Richardson Jr. David Fox James Emery Jonathan Emery John Crage Francis Nickles John Varnum Jr. Edward Taylor Stephen Kimball Thomas Hildreth Stephen RusseU Jr. Stephen Farmer Alexander Lindsay Jacob Colburn Jr. Joseph Chamberlain Joseph Chamberlain Jr. Darius Harris Ephraim Curtis Jr. Ephraim Richardson Stephen Wood Daniel Fox 190 HISTORY OF DRACUT The Legislative Committee decided that the proper place for the location was "on the height of land in the highway be tween the barn of Col. Varnum and the orchard of said Varnum northwesterly of said barn. This decision would locate the build ing on the west side of Beaver brook as proposed three years previous to this time. This report was adopted by the Council as the Senate was then called, but the House did not concur and thus the matter was left as before. The town clerk's record of August 22, 1748, states the action of the town ' ' Voted to accept the meeting house that was voted to be set up at the Southwest corner of John Bowers homestead lot to stand and be finished at the Highway Southward of Capt John Colburns house where the frame is already raised." September 6, 1748, "Voted to take part or all of the old meeting house to finish the new. ' ' Not withstanding this vote, the old house was offered for sale at auction in 1758 and purchased by Daniel Abbott, "he being the Highest Bider in sd Vandue." The exact site of the new house was unknown for many years, but following the transfer of the Capt. John Colburn homestead we can locate it very nearly. March 1, 1750 Capt. John Colburn conveyed his "homestead farm containing 60 acres lying on both sides of the road by the meeting house" to his son, Ensign Joshua Colburn. November 4, 1757, Joshua deeded the dwelling house, barn and eight acres of land to Nathaniel Mitchell, a tanner and currier, whose vats were on Tanhouse brook. The tract is described as bounded ' ' at the Southwest corner at a great stone in the end of a wall by the Northward side of the Townway, by the westerly side of the gate by the road about three rods North Easterly from the North East corner of the meeting house in said town." The writer remembers this gate or, what is more probable, one of the later built gates which stood at the end of the lane which led from Pleasant street northward to the Swain house and which occupied the land on which the cottages on the west side of Upland street near the line of the Clark farm, are built. The southwest corner of this property on the street is the same as the southeast corner of the George M. Clark homestead. An old deed of this last named property, dated 1765, from Daniel Abbot to Rev. Nathan Davis gives the same distance from this bound to the "North East corner of the meeting house" as CHURCH HISTORY 191 mentioned in the Mitchel deed, that is, about three rods. Meas urements from this bound locate the front of the building at the Une of the Justus Richardson land opposite the Clark house which stands at the corner of Clark and Pleasant streets. The north side was in the highway which is four rods wide at this place. The west end of the building must have been about thirteen rods eastward from the east line of Sladen street at its junction with Pleasant street. By placing the building in the highway the town avoided the expense of buying land and this recalls a statement found in an old diary written in 1679 and confirms the fact that the buildings were sometimes placed in the highway. Two traveUers, visiting in the vicinity of New York City, write that they came "to the first village called Breuklen, which has a small and ugly little church in the middle of the road." On the south or front side there was a door midway between the ends of the building, also one at the east and west ends. When partly finished it was used as a house of worship and for town meetings, but the galleries were unfinished until 1754 as in that year it was ' ' Voted to Let out the finishing of the Gallery in the Meeting Hous to those that would appear to Do it cheapest and workman Like." At a town meeting in 1755 there was an article in the warrant ' ' To see if the town will dignifie the seats in the meeting house." It was voted to seat the meeting house in said town and a committee consisting of Samuel Varnum, Josiah Richardson, Robert Hildreth, Timothy Coburn and Sam uel Coburn was appointed. Another vote declared ' ' that the first in Dignity shall be the fore seat below and the second seat below in sd meeting house shall be the second seat in dignity and the fore seat in the front gallery shall be the third seat in Dignity in sd house and the fore seat in the side gallery shall be the fourth seat in Dignity and the third seat below shall be the fifth seat in Dignity and the second in the front gallery shall be the sixth seat in Dignity and the fourth seat below shall be the seventh seat in Dignity in sd meeting hous and also the second seat in the side gallery shall be the eighth seat in Dignity in sd hous. ' ' After dignifying the house the gallery seats were sold at ' ' Vandue ' ' or auction on condition ' ' that those that Purchas Rite or Rites in sd pews shall not have liberty to sell or Dispose of 192 HISTORY OF DRACUT the same without a Usance from sd town and they that Purchas the same shall be obliged to set in them either themselves or by ther wyves or children or som friend but not to send a servant to set there or a childe under thirteen years of age or any other to Degrade sd seet or seets or to make uneasiness to their seet mats that Purchas a part or a Right in the same seet and Pews. ' ' They also voted ' ' to purchas a cover for the Cushing for the Desk for the meeting house in sd Dracut, ' ' and by separate vote they decided to " by a valvit one and to be of the same Choler as the one on the old desk. ' ' To keep it free from dust they voted ' ' to by som worshlather sheep skinn to cover sd cushing under sd sheep skinn. ' ' The pew owners were aUowed to build their own pews but restrictions were placed on them in relation to size, height, etc. In 1768 they voted "not to appoint any seat in the meeting house for the negroes to sit in." Apparently it was not consid ered necessary to specify any particular seats for them as it is not reasonable to suppose that they were to be excluded. A few specimens of the minor matters acted upon by the town, where now the church or society would take action are quoted from the records. "1786 To see if the town will choose one or more persons to assist Capt. Russell in pitching the tune. Also to see if the town will vote that singing shall be performed a part or all of the time without reading the psalm. Voted that Capt. Stephen Russell be assisted by Joseph B. Varnum, Moses Nowel and Joshua Bradley in setting the psalm. Also that singing be performed in the afternoon without reading the psalm." The singing at the church service was at first unaccom panied by any instrument, so a pitch pipe, usuaUy made of wood was used to give the pitch, and later when vioUns and bass viols were introduced opposition was made to their use because they were used at dances. These instruments with bassoons were used until melodeons and, later, church organs superseded them. "Voted to appoint Capt. William Hildreth, Capt. Josiah Hil dreth, Lieut. Israel Hildreth, Lieut. Abraham Coburn and Lieut Micah Hildreth to be a committee to see that the Meeting House Doors be kept Shut on the day of the Ordination till the Council and Delegates and the Church are Ready to Enter the Meeting house and then open them." In 1786, "Voted that the minister HON. ARTHUR W. C'OLIU'RN DEACON JOSHUA COLBURN