Yale University Library 39002002935048 r^^JJy-nrf i fpr- ike founding of a College in ¦ ihi$(Zolon.f I • YAILE«»¥ffl¥EIESinnf • ^^^rr;-"-^X: ^ iii.^.- -. Gift of WINTHROP E. DWIGHT 1928 ABRAHAM LINCOLN /v///v/V/V /////•/.'/;/ (// /yoy ABRAHAM LINCOLN A BIOGRAPHICAL ESSAY BY CARL SCHURZ WITH AN ESSAY ON THE PORTRAITS OF LINCOLN BY TRUMAN H. BARTLETT ILLUSTRATED BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND COMPANY MDCCCCVII COPYRIGHT 1 89 1 BY CARL SCHURZ COPYRIGHT I907 BY HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OF THIS EDITION IO4O COPIES WERE PRINTED AT THE RIVERSIDE PRESS CAMBRIDGE MDCCCCVII \ CONTENTS ON THE LIFE-MASK OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN Page i By Richard Watson Gilder THE PORTRAITS OF LINCOLN 5 By Truman H. Bartlett THE HAND OF LINCOLN 39 By Edmund Clarence Stedman ABRAHAM LINCOLN: A BIOGRAPHICAL ESSAY 43 By Carl Schurz NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABRAHAM LINCOLN IN 1863 Frontispiece This photograph was made by Brady on the Sunday before the Gettysburg speech, delivered November 19, 1863. The following account of the circumstances attending it is taken from an article by Noah Brooks in " Scribner's Magazine" for February, 1878: — "One Saturday night, the President asked me if I had any objection to accompanying him to a photographer's on Sun day. He said that it was impossible for him to go on any other day, and he would like to have me see him ' set.' Next day we went together, and as he was leaving the house he stopped and said, ' Hold on, I have forgotten Everett !' Stepping hastily back, he brought with him a folded paper, which he explained was a printed copy of the oration that Mr. Everett was to deliver, in a few days, at Gettysburg. It occupied nearly the whole of two pages of the c Boston Journal,' and looked very formidable indeed. As we walked away from the house, Lin coln said, ' It was very kind in Mr. Everett to send me this. I suppose he was afraid I should say something that he wanted to say. He need n't have been alarmed. My speech is n't long.' ' So it is written, is it, then ? ' I asked. c Well, no,' was the reply. ' It is not exactly written. It is not finished, any way. I have written it over, two or three times, and I shall have to give it another lick before I am satisfied. But it is short, short, short.' I found, afterward, that the Gettysburg speech was actually written, and rewritten a great many times. The several draughts and interlineations of that famous address, if in existence, would be an invaluable memento of its great author. Lincoln took the copy of Everett's oration with him to the photographer's, thinking that he might have time to look it over while waiting for the operator. But he chatted so constantly, and asked so many questions about the art of NOTES ON photography, that he scarcely opened it. The folded paper is seen lying on the table, near the President, in the picture which was made that day." THE LIFE-MASK OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN, FULL-FACE VIEW FROM THE PLASTER Page $ This life-mask of Lincoln was made by Leonard W. Volk in April, i860, just before Lincoln's nomination for the presi dency. A few replicas of the mask in plaster were early made, and it has also been cast in bronze, — in Paris, in 1877, under the direction of Mr. Truman H. Bartlett, and in New York, a few years later, as the result of a subscription taken for this purpose. An important account of the making of the mask, written by the sculptor himself, will be found in the " Cen tury Magazine" for December, 1881. THE LIFE-MASK OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN, THREE-QUARTERS VIEW FROM THE PLAS TER Page 12 RIGHT PROFILE OF THE MASK IN BRONZE Page 18 LEFT PROFILE OF THE MASK IN BRONZE Page 22 PROFILES OF LINCOLN AND WASHINGTON Page 26 The life-mask of Lincoln by Leonard W. Volk and that of Washington by the French sculptor Houdon are considered the two most important contributions yet made to American plastic portraiture. The profile of Washington is taken from Houdon's bust, the face of which was practically a replica of the life-mask. THE ILLUSTRATIONS xi THE HANDS OF LINCOLN Page zo The casts of the hands of Lincoln were made by Leonard W. Volk in June, i860, just after Lincoln's nomination for the Presidency. Replicas in plaster and bronze are not uncommon. THE HAND OF LINCOLN Page 41 ABRAHAM LINCOLN IN 1859 Page 50 From an original photograph owned by William Lloyd Gar rison of Lexington, Mass. This photograph was made by A. W. Fassett of Chicago in October, 1859, and the nega tive was lost in the great Chicago fire in 1871. ABRAHAM LINCOLN IN 1861 Page 64 From a rare photograph by an unknown photographer, copy righted in 1 861 by D. Appleton & Company. From a copy in the possession of Francis J. Garrison of Lexington, Mass. LINCOLN WITH HIS GENERALS AT ANTIETAM Page 70 From a photograph taken by Alexander Gardner for Brady just after the battle of Antietam on the 3d of October, 1862. The original negative is now in the possession of the War Department at Washington. LINCOLN AND GENERAL McCLELLAN Page 82 From a photograph by Gardner taken at the same time as the foregoing. The original negative is in the possession of the War Department at Washington. xii NOTES ON LINCOLN STANDING ALONE Page 88 This is an enlargement of Lincoln's figure in a photograph by Brady of a group composed of Lincoln, Gen. J. A. McCler- nand, and Pinkerton the army detective. RIGHT AND LEFT PROFILES OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN Page 94 The profile of the right side of Lincoln's face is from a pho tograph made by Brady in 1864. That of the left side was made by Brady on November 8, 1863. LINCOLN AND HIS SECRETARIES, JOHN HAY AND JOHN G. NICOLAY Page 102 From a photograph by Brady taken at the same time as the left profile, November 8, 1863. ABRAHAM LINCOLN IN 1864 P^mio From an un-retouched negative made March 9, 1864, by Rice. This negative, with one of General Grant, was made in commemoration of the appointment of Grant as Lieutenant- General and Commander of all the armies of the Republic. LINCOLN AND HIS SON "TAD" Page 122 From a photograph of uncertain date, by Brady. LINCOLN IN 1865 Page 128 From the photograph by H. F. Warren of Waltham, Mass., taken March 6, 1865. The following interesting account of THE ILLUSTRATIONS xiii this late and important picture of Lincoln was communicated to the " Century Magazine" for October, 1882, by Mr. Alex ander Starbuck of Waltham, Mass. : — "About the last of February, 1865, Mr. H. F. Warren, a photographer of Waltham, Mass., left home, intending, if practicable, to visit the army in front of Richmond and Pe tersburg. Arriving in Washington on the morning of the 4th of March, and finding it necessary to procure passes to carry out the end he had in view, he concluded to remain there until the inauguration ceremonies were over, and, having car ried with him all the apparatus necessary for taking nega tives, he decided to try to secure a sitting from the President. At that time rumors of plots and dangers had caused the friends of President Lincoln to urge upon him the necessity of a guard, and, as he had finally permitted the presence of such a body, an audience with him was somewhat difficult. On the afternoon ofthe 6th of March, Mr. Warren sought a presentation to Mr. Lincoln, but found, after consulting with the guard, that an in terview could be had on that day in only a somewhat irregular manner. After some conversation with the officer in charge, who became convinced of his loyalty, Mr. Warren was admitted within the lines, and, at the same time, was given to understand that the surest way to obtain an audience with the President was through the intercession of his little son c Tad.' The lat ter was a great pet with the soldiers, and was constantly at their barracks, and soon made his appearance, mounted upon his pony. He and the pony were soon placed in position and photographed, after which Mr. Warren asked c Tad' to tell his father that a man had come all the way from Boston, and was particularly anxious to see him and obtain a sitting from him. ' Tad ' went to see his father, and word was soon returned that Mr. Lincoln would comply. In the mean time Mr. Warren had improvised a kind of studio upon the south balcony of the White House. Mr. Lincoln soon came out, and, saying but a very few words, took his seat as indicated. After a single negative was taken, he inquired, ' Is that all, sir ? ' Unwilling to detain him longer than was absolutely necessary, Mr. Warren xiv NOTES ON THE ILLUSTRATIONS replied, c Yes, sir,' and the President immediately withdrew. At the time he appeared upon the balcony the wind was blow ing freshly, as his disarranged hair indicates, and, as sunset was rapidly approaching, it was difficult to obtain a sharp picture. Six weeks later President Lincoln was dead, and it is doubtless true that this is the last photograph ever made of him." There is a good deal of evidence to point to the belief that the so-called "last" photograph of Lincoln by Gardner, for which the date of April 9, 1865, is given, was actually taken somewhat earlier than this by Warren. ON THE LIFE-MASK OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN ON THE LIFE-MASK OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN This bronze doth keep the very form and mould Of our great martyr's face. Yes, this is he: That brow all wisdom, all benignity ; That human, humorous mouth; those cheeks that hold Like some harsh landscape all the summer's gold ; That spirit fit for sorrow, as the sea For storms to beat on ; the lone agony Those silent, patient lips too well foretold. Yes, this is he who ruled a world of men As might some prophet of the elder day — Brooding above the tempest and the fray With deep-eyed thought and more than mortal ken. A power was his beyond the touch of art Or armed strength — his pure and mighty heart. Richard Watson Gilder. THE PORTRAITS OF LINCOLN THE PORTRAITS OF LINCOLN T is the popular belief, the world over, that Abraham Lincoln was in face and figure, in action or repose, an ugly man. It is doubt ful if any human being known to history has been the subject of such complete and reiterated description, by high and low, friend and enemy; and the vocabulary employed to describe him includes about every word in common use in the English language, the meaning of which is opposed to anything admir able, elegant, beautiful, or refined. The words used to set forth the physical appearance of this per sonage, now rated by imposing fame as one of the Great of the Earth, gather when assembled a new and affecting interest. From the time Abraham Lincoln was fourteen years of age, then more than six feet high and weighing about one hundred and sixty pounds, until he was nominated for the Presidency, he was locally known by the following pleasing char- 8 ABRAHAM LINCOLN acterizations : "angular," "ungainly," "clumsy," "gaunt;" "awkward," "thin," "leggy," "gawky ;" "gigantic," "solemn visaged," "beardless clodhop per;" "uncouth," "half-clad boor, whose heavy features were flabby, lifeless, and deeply furrowed; " "a homely, lank, long, dried-up, bony-armed man, with leathery face, shrivelled and yellow; " "long- limbed, brawny-handed, queer-looking old fellow, with prominent features, dull and expressionless; " "rough-looking backwoodsman with a wiry, raw- boned, tall frame and ganglion legs." His clothes and his unconventional movements and manners have received a similar unflattering description. During Lincoln's stumping tours near home or in the neighboring states, his personal appearance received its accustomed attention. In Michigan, in 1856, talking for Fremont, he was known as the "Long Sucker of Illinois; " in Ohio, the "Giant ofthe Sangamon Bottoms;" and farther west, the " Illinois Rail Splitter," and other suggestive names. Lincoln himself was not impressed with his own beauty, and often referred, throughout his life, to his physical plainness, though claiming that inside he was as much of a gentleman as any one ; and even Mrs. Lincoln called him an "ungainly" husband. Joseph Medill, editor ofthe Chicago " Tribune," ABRAHAM LINCOLN 9 who was with Lincoln occasionally during the Douglas debates, says that it was a standing joke of his that there was one " homelier" man in Illi nois than himself, and that was his friend Archie Williams of Quincy, who, he said, had carried the ugly man's jack-knife for twenty years without meeting a successful competitor for it, and he reck oned Archie would carry it as long as he lived, though when he died it would descend to himself. But Lincoln got his jack-knife before death got Archie. "I was accosted on the cars," so he told the story, "by a stranger, who said, < Excuse me, sir, I have an article in my possession which be longs to you.' 'How is that?' I asked, consider ably astonished. The stranger took a jack-knife from his pocket. l This knife,' he said, < was placed in my hands some years ago, with the injunction that I was to keep it until I found a man uglier than myself. I have to say, sir, that I think you are fairly entitled to the property.' " Only once in his life, perhaps, did Lincoln be come painfully conscious of the miserable appear ance of his clothes, and that was when he came to New York in i860 to make his Cooper Institute speech. He brought with him a new suit of black and wore it when he was waited upon by the re- io ABRAHAM LINCOLN presentatives of the Republican Club. He noticed the difference between their well-cut, smooth- fitting garments and his ill-fitting and badly wrinkled ones, and spoke of it freely to them. On his return to Springfield he told Herndon,his law partner, that for some time after he began his speech, and until he became warmed up, he im agined that the audience were noticing the con trast between his rude Western clothes and the neat and well-made suits of Mr. Bryant and others who sat on the platform. But this annoyance was of short duration, and he made no effort while in the East to improve his appearance. As a Presidential candidate Lincoln appeared to the country an untoward being in face, figure, and movement. The recorded observations of the President's personal appearance from the time he arrived in Washington until his death, made by an ever-increasing number and almost indescribable diversity of people, corroborated Western observation, giving no indication that the older East saw differently from the younger West. And so, in consequence, while the feeling of Lincoln's rare and superior worth as a man has steadily increased since his death, with start ling strides and unexpected surprises, his personal ABRAHAM LINCOLN n appearance as it was first described has gone into unquestioned history. Biographers, statesmen, scholars, and writers have echoed ordinary ob servers with such persistence that it would seem that they took delight in trying to heighten the in congruous contrast between the outward and the inward man. Lowell, in the " North American Review " for January, 1 864, apologized for Lincoln's not being handsome or elegant, and at the close of the article called him homely and awkward. In his " Commemoration Ode," while fully recognizing the high character of the first American, he says that " they (the people) knew that outward grace is dust." In his Birmingham address he again al ludes to this contrast, remarking: "But democra cies have likewise their finer instincts. I have also seen the wisest statesman and most pregnant speaker of our generation, a man of humble birth and ungainly manners, of little culture beyond what his own genius supplied, become more ab solute in power than any monarch of modern times, through the reverence of his countrymen for his honesty, his wisdom, his sincerity, his faith in God and man, and the nobly humane sim plicity of his character." 12 ABRAHAM LINCOLN Almost the only person who has publicly writ ten against the popular belief concerning Lin coln's personal appearance is Hon. J. G. Nicolay, the President's private secretary and subsequent co-biographer. He says that to him " there was neither oddity, eccentricity, awkwardness, or grotesqueness in his face, figure, or movement ; " that, on the contrary, he was prepossessing in appearance when the en tire man was fairly considered, mentally and phy sically, his unusual height and proportion, and the general movement of body and mind. He also states that Lincoln's "walk was vigor ous, elastic, easy, rather quick, firm, and digni fied ; no shuffling or hesitating ; he had a large swing in his movement; and when enunciating a great thought that he wished to impress upon his hearers he would straighten up to an impres sive height." Mr. Nicolay gives this as his impression of Lin coln's appearance without seeking to corroborate it by any fact of physical construction. If the words quoted at the beginning of this paper were to be taken, as they have been by the world, as final and conclusive, and there were nothing else than the uncorroborated opinion of Mr. Nicolay ABRAHAM LINCOLN 13 to assist in further examination, there would be no way out of the belief that Lincoln was an " awfully homely " man, — a human frame cruelly proportioned, with articulations orderless, aim less, and unpleasant, housing a wonderful heart and mind. But the truth is that these words were, in the large majority of cases, only parts of sen tences, or parts of a thoughtless general summing up ofthe personal appearance of the man, while the other parts included words indicative of beauti ful physical qualities, or statements of mental and physical relationships, admirable, significant, and suggestive. Nor are these desirable qualities and relation ships isolated ones, peculiar to or only affecting single members of the body; they are intimately connected with the whole physical structure, and furnish evidence that it was different from the physique first described. The excellences of Lincoln's appearance may be classed under two heads, — facial expression and general movement of the body. The following descriptions of Lincoln's eyes were spoken or written without qualification, and are taken from a large number of sources, many of them being the recollections of women: — 14 ABRAHAM LINCOLN « Soft, tender, bluish eyes ; ' " two bright, dreamy eyes that seem to gaze through you with out looking at you ; " " patient, loving eyes ; ' " the kindest eyes ever placed in mortal head ; ' " His eyes had an expression impossible to de scribe, as though they lay in deep caverns, ready to spring out at an instant call ; " " His gray eyes would flash fire when speaking against slav ery, or look volumes of love when speaking of liberty, justice, and the progress of mankind;" "His eyes had a far-away look;' "The saddest face that ever was seen — sadness seemed to drip from him as he walked ; ' "A sad, preoccupied, far-away look, so intense that he seemed to be in a trance;" "Inexpressible sadness in his eyes, with a far-away look, as if they were searching for something they had seen long, long years ago;" "Melancholy eyes that seemed to wander far away." The rapid change of expression in Lincoln's eyes and face is thus set forth: — "His little gray eyes flashed in a face aglow with the fire of his profound thoughts, and his uneasy movements and diffident manner sunk themselves beneath the waves of righteous indig nation that came sweeping over him." "His eyes ABRAHAM LINCOLN 15 flashed fire, he was no longer homely and un gainly, his whole appearance changed in an in stant, his body was transformed, and his face was lighted with a mysterious inner light." "His eyes flashed with pleasure, and his sad counte nance lighted up and became almost beautiful." "The dull, listless expression dropped like a mask. The melancholy shadow disappeared in a twink ling. The eyes began to sparkle, the mouth to smile, and the whole countenance was wreathed in animation." " When affected by humor, sympa thy, or admiration for some heroic deed or sacri fice for the right, his face changed in an instant, the hard lines faded out of it, and the emotion seemed to diffuse itself all over him. His sad face of a sudden became radiant; he seemed like one inspired." Several of Lincoln's friends to whom I wrote for early photographs of him answered that they had none, because no picture represented the light that was in his eyes when he was listening or speak ing, and in such aspects alone did they wish to remember him. And one added, " It was then only that he was in the world." Of Lincoln's naturalness, native dignity, and grace, this is said : — 1 6 ABRAHAM LINCOLN " He had perfect naturalness, a native grace which never failed to shine through his words and acts." " He had the gentleness of the unspoiled child of nature." " He had a dignity of bearing and character that commanded respect." " Nat ural grandeur of demeanor." "A natural gen tleman." "He had a wonderful countenance, easy dignity, and ever-present tact." " He always maintained a singular dignity and reserve with out the least effort." " He was awkward, but it was the awkwardness of nature, which is akin to grace." When I asked a Boston man, the closest ob server in matters of men and art I ever knew, if he thought, as most people did, that Lincoln was awkward, he replied : " Yes, he was awkward, but with an elegance that a king might envy and com mon men despise. He moved with an ease that was in the highest degree impressive, and with a grace of nature that would have become a woman." There is no difference of opinion in regard to the change that came over Lincoln's appearance from the time he began to address an audience until he became warmed up. At first he ap peared awkward, diffident, and uneasy; but as soon ABRAHAM LINCOLN 17 as he got hold of his subject, or it had got hold of him, he was another man. He seemed in spired, and was immensely imposing and dignified. He is thus described : " The act of expressing a great sentiment or concluding a fine period trans formed Lincoln's awkwardness, uncouthness, and boorishness into beauty and nobility of bearing. In making a speech on a subject that deeply interested him, he often quivered all over with emotion, nearly stifling his utterance." Of Lincoln's stretching-up capacity, or vertical elasticity, there is also no difference of opinion, and this, as the artist knows, is a quality marked only in people of the highest physical construc tion. That he could stretch up to an unwonted height, or appear to do so, is well authenticated. In interesting conjunction with Lincoln's facial and physical transformations, — the ready expres sion of a rich and sensitive emotional nature, — may be placed his great muscular strength and activity, and the terrible character of his anger when aroused by injustice to himself or to a friend, though he was averse to any combative exercise of his strength save in a friendly wrestle, or to help some one in trouble. Now we come to the crucial questions : Do 1 8 ABRAHAM LINCOLN not the beautiful character of Lincoln's eyes, the sudden and peculiarly impressive change in his facial expression, his unusual power of stretch ing up, or vertical elasticity, and the rapidity and strength of his bodily movement, suggest the idea that there were admirable qualities in his physi cal make-up not included in the popular belief? It seems to me that these things suggest a splen didly sensitive, responsive, and powerful system of nerves ; a muscular organization of a rare and superior kind; and that instead of high intel lectual and emotional qualities incased in an ill- assorted body, it will be found that there was an admirable body, and a deep harmony between the outer and inner man. An examination of the portraits of Lincoln will help to make this apparent. It is doubtful if any personage in history has had as many portraits made from life in the short space of seven years — by human workers in oil and clay, by sunlight in photographs, ambrotypes, and tintypes — as Abraham Lincoln. It began during the Douglas debates in 1858, became a campaign necessity in Springfield the second day after his nomination, and continued almost with- // /rj//r/'. //¦?.'// / //r...-f'ftv,jh- ¦/ // /-rnfttsr ABRAHAM LINCOLN 19 out interruption until forty days before he breathed his last. Mr. L. W. Volk, a Chicago sculptor, was the first artist to whom Lincoln sat for his portrait, — a bust, — finished a month or two before the Chi cago convention. An event occurred in the pro gress of making this bust that may be justly called the second most important one in the history of American portraiture, — the taking of a most per fect mask of the future President's face, — the other being a like process with the face of Wash ington in 1785, by the French sculptor Houdon. This Lincoln mask is the first reliable contri bution to the material upon which a safe exami nation ofthe forms of his face can be made. The photographs, ambrotypes, and tintypes made be fore and after he became President are also valu able contributions. Those, with casts of both his hands, taken a few days after his nomination, com plete what there is of unquestionable material by which to judge of the character of Lincoln's face, figure, and physical movement. It is to Frenchmen that the credit of first see ing the true beauty of the life mask, of appreciat ing it and describing it, is due. When, in 1877, I took a plaster copy to the oldest bronze founder 20 ABRAHAM LINCOLN in Paris, to get it cast in bronze, I put it down on a table side by side with a mask of the Abbe Lamennais. The first words of the founder were: "What a beautiful face! Why, it's more beauti ful and has more character than the Abbe's, and we think that is the handsomest one in France! What an extraordinary construction, and what fine forms it has ! " Then he asked who it was, and added, "I shall take pleasure in showing it to So-and-so," naming several of the principal sculptors in Paris for whom he did work. Some weeks after, when I went to get the bronze copy, the founder told me that these sculp tors and others had seen the Lincoln mask and ex pressed themselves in the most appreciative terms of what they saw in it. Here in substance is what they said: "It is unusual in general construction, it has a new and interesting character, and its planes are remarkably beautiful and subtle. If it belongs to any type, and we know of none such, it must be a wonderful specimen of that type." Like things were said of it by other French artists, as I took pains to show it for examination. I lent the mask and a number of Lincoln photographs to the best French genre sculptor of modern times, for several months, for him to see what he could ABRAHAM LINCOLN 21 get out of it in making a face in clay. When he got through he made these observations : " I can do nothing with that head, and I doubt if any one in these times can. The more I studied it, the more difficulties I found. The subtle charac ter of its forms is beyond belief. There is no face like it." Fremiet was particularly interested. He said, among other things : "It seems impossible that a new country like yours should produce such a face. It is unique." Then he asked, " Do you know anything about the physique of your mar tyr President? He must have been tall and slim, having little flesh, and very alert in action." As I was then making some sketches of a statuette, based upon a very little knowledge of Lincoln's physical appearance, Fremiet' s suggestions were of great value, for I knew him to be a learned ethnologist. He then recommended me to get for a model a man of the neighborhood who was tall and slim, but very compactly built. His height was six feet, four inches, — the same, I learned long afterwards, as that of Lincoln. At the close of our conversation, Fremiet said, " You have in hand a wonderfully interesting subject. I envy you." 22 ABRAHAM LINCOLN No word was uttered or suggested by any of these persons indicating consideration of the mask from a popular, or so-called " classic," point of view ; it was invariably looked at from the point of view of individuaLcharacter, as an original and interesting piece of facial construction, and ad mired for the harmony of the face with itself. There was no reference to ugliness, coarseness, or flabbiness of form. It was the same with the pho tographs shown to them. A short detailed review of the mask would be something like this: a projecting face with un usual vigor and contrasts of planes; long, large, protruding ears; strong, angular lower jaw, and high chin; all lines of face muscular or bony, strongly, firmly, and delicately marked ; the fore head wrinkled to the roots of the hair ; the full ness above and immediately back of the temples very rich and firm, giving not only an important contrast to the line of the face below, but finish ing that part of the head with a commanding form and outline. The profile is also unusual, in the character of. the lines and in their construction: first, the full line of the forehead, carried from the top of the nose upward; second, the projecting nose, prac- oo .^Toftte ^ojfySA^ i'ia,j. /in/// ////fvi//t S///A'/// ABRAHAM LINCOLN 65 only thirty-nine years old. In the national Demo cratic convention of 1852, he appeared even as an aspirant to the nomination for the presidency, as the favorite of "young America," and received a respectable vote. He had far outstripped Lin coln in what is commonly called political success and in reputation. But it had frequently happened that in political campaigns Lincoln felt himself impelled, or was selected by his Whig friends, to answer Douglas's speeches; and thus the two were looked upon, in a large part of the State at least, as the representative combatants of their respec tive parties in the debates before popular meetings. As soon, therefore, as, after the passage of his Kan sas-Nebraska bill, Douglas returned to Illinois to defend his cause before his constituents, Lincoln, obeying not only (his own impulse, but also gen eral expectation, stepped forward as his principal opponent. Thus the struggle about the princi ples involved in the Kansas-Nebraska bill, or, in a broader sense, the struggle between freedom and slavery, assumed in Illinois the outward form of a personal contest between Lincoln and Douglas; and as it continued and became more animated, that personal contest in Illinois was watched with constantly increasing interest by the whole coun- 66 ABRAHAM LINCOLN try. When, in 1858, Douglas's senatorial term being about to expire, Lincoln was formally desig nated by the Republican convention of Illinois as their candidate for the Senate, to take Douglas's place, and the two contestants agreed to debate the questions at issue face to face in a series of pubfic meetings, the eyes of the whole American people were turned eagerly to that one point; and the spectacle reminded one of those lays of ancient times telling of two armies, in battle array, stand ing still to see their two principal champions fight out the contested cause between the lines in single combat. Lincoln had then reached the full maturity of his powers. His equipment as a statesman did not embrace a comprehensive knowledge of public affairs. What he had studied he had indeed made his own, with the eager craving and that zealous tenacity characteristic of superior minds learning under difficulties. But his narrow opportunities and the unsteady life he had led during his younger years had not permitted the accumulation of large stores in his mind. It is true, in political campaigns he had occasionally spoken on the ostensible issues between the Whigs and the Democrats, the tariff, internal improvements, banks, and so on, but only ABRAHAM LINCOLN 67 in a perfunctory manner. Had he ever given much serious thought and study to these subjects, it is safe to assume that a mind so prolific of original conceits as his would certainly have produced some utterance upon them worth remembering. His soul had evidently never been deeply stirred by such topics. But when his moral nature was aroused, his brain developed an untiring activity until it had mastered all the knowledge within reach. As soon as the repeal of the Missouri Compromise had thrust the slavery question into politics as the paramount issue, Lincoln plunged into an arduous study of all its legal, historical, and moral aspects, and then his mind became a complete arsenal of argument. His rich natural gifts, trained by long and varied prac tice, had made him an orator of rare persuasiveness. In his immature days, he had pleased himself for a short period with that inflated, high-flown style which, among the uncultivated, passes for " beau tiful speaking." His inborn truthfulness and his artistic instinct soon overcame that aberration, and revealed to him the noble beauty and strength of simplicity. He possessed an uncommon power of clear and compact statement, which might have re minded those who knew the story of his early youth of the efforts of the poor boy, when he copied his 68 ABRAHAM LINCOLN compositions from the scraped wooden shovel, care fully to trim his expressions in order to save paper. His language had the energy of honest directness, and he was a master of logical lucidity. He loved to point and enliven his reasoning by humorous illustrations, usually anecdotes of Western life, of which he had an inexhaustible store at his com mand. These anecdotes had not seldom a flavor of rustic robustness about them, but he used them with great effect, while amusing the audience, to give life to an abstraction, to explode an absurdity, to clinch an argument, to drive home an admoni tion. The natural kindliness of his tone, softening prejudice and disarming partisan rancor, would often open to his reasoning a way into minds most unwilling to receive it. Yet his greatest power consisted in the charm of his individuality. That charm did not, in the ordi nary way, appeal to the ear or to the eye. His voice was not melodious; rather shrill and piercing, espe cially when it rose to its high treble in moments of great animation. His figure was unhandsome, and the action of his unwieldy limbs awkward. He com manded none of the outward graces of oratory as they are commonly understood. His charm was of a different kind. It flowed from the rare depth and ABRAHAM LINCOLN 69 genuineness of his convictions and his sympathetic feelings. Sympathy was the strongest element in his nature. One of his biographers, who knew him before he became President, says: "Lincoln's com passion might be stirred deeply by an object present, but never by an object absent and unseen. In the former case he would most likely extend relief, with little inquiry into the merits of the case, because, as he expressed it himself, it 'took a pain out of his own heart.' ' Only half of this is correct. It is cer tainly true that he could not witness any individ ual distress or oppression, or any kind of suffering, without feeling a pang of pain himself, and that by relieving as much as he could the suffering of oth ers he put an end to his own. This compassionate impulse to help he felt not only for human beings, but for every living creature. As in his boyhood he angrily reproved the boys who tormented a wood turtle by putting a burning coal on its back, so, we are told, he would, when a mature man, on a jour ney, dismount from his buggy and wade waist-deep in mire to rescue a pig struggling in a swamp. In deed, appeals to his compassion were so irresistible to him, and he felt it so difficult to refuse anything when his refusal could give pain, that he himself sometimes spoke of his inability to say "no" as 70 ABRAHAM LINCOLN a positive weakness. But that certainly does not prove that his compassionate feeling was confined to individual cases of suffering witnessed with his own eyes. As the boy was moved by the aspect of the tortured wood turtle to compose an essay against cruelty to animals in general, so the aspect of other cases of suffering and wrong wrought up his moral nature, and set his mind to work against cruelty, injustice, and oppression in general. As his sympathy went forth to others, it attracted others to him. Especially those whom he called the "plain people" felt themselves drawn to him by the instinctive feeling that he understood, esteemed, and appreciated them. He had grown up among the poor, the lowly, the ignorant. He never ceased to remember the good souls he had met among them, and the many kindnesses they had done him. Although in his mental development he had risen far above them, he never looked down upon them. How they felt and how they reasoned he knew, for so he had once felt and reasoned himself. How they could be moved he knew, for so he had once been moved himself, and he practiced moving others. His mind was much larger than theirs, but it thor oughly comprehended theirs; and while he thought much farther than they, their thoughts were ever ':'' V .-*'¦'''. :-v?ri" •'":.;1 .'" \0 > » i ¦ j. . - . ¦?i ?&M.>y if-y \f- ' fe : iftf s. ABRAHAM LINCOLN 71 present to him. Nor had the visible distance be tween them grown as wide as his rise in the world would seem to have warranted. Much of his back woods speech and manners still clung to him. Al though he had become "Mr. Lincoln" to his later acquaintances, he was still "Abe" to the "Nats" and "Billys" and "Daves" of his youth; and their familiarity neither appeared unnatural to them, nor was it in the least awkward to him. He still told and enjoyed stories similar to those he had told and enjoyed in the Indiana settlement and at New Salem. His wants remained as modest as they had ever been; his domestic habits 'had by no means completely accommodated themselves to those of his more high-born wife; and though the "Ken tucky jeans" apparel had long been dropped, his clothes of better material and better make would sit ill sorted on his gigantic limbs. His cotton umbrella, without a handle, and tied together with a coarse string to keep it from flapping, when he carried on his circuit rides, is said to be remem bered still by some of his surviving neighbors. This rusticity of habit was utterly free from that affected contempt of refinement and comfort which self- made men sometimes carry into their more afflu ent circumstances. To Abraham Lincoln it was 72 ABRAHAM LINCOLN entirely natural, and all those who came into con tact with him knew it to be so. In his ways of thinking and feeling he had become a gentleman in the highest sense, but the refining process had polished but little the outward form. The plain people, therefore, still considered "honest Abe Lin coln" one of themselves: and when they felt, which they no doubt frequently did, that his thoughts and aspirations moved in a sphere above their own, they were all the more proud of him, without any diminution of fellow feeling. It was this relation of mutual sympathy and understanding between Lincoln and the plain people that gave him his peculiar power as a public man, and singularly fit ted him, as we shall see, for that leadership which was preeminently required in the great crisis then coming on, — the leadership which indeed thinks and moves ahead ofthe masses, but always remains within sight and sympathetic touch of them. He entered upon the campaign of 1858 better equipped than he had ever been before. He not only instinctively felt, but he had convinced him self by arduous study, that in this struggle against the spread of slavery he had right, justice, philo sophy, the enlightened opinion of mankind, his tory, the Constitution, and good policy on his side. ABRAHAM LINCOLN 73 It was observed that after he began to discuss the slavery question his speeches were pitched in a much loftier key than his former oratorical efforts. While he remained fond of telling funny stories in private conversation, they disappeared more and more from his public discourse. He would still now and then point his argument with expressions of inimitable quaintness, and flash out rays of kindly humor and witty irony; but his general tone was serious, and rose sometimes to genuine solemnity. His masterly skill in dialectical thrust and parry, his wealth of knowledge, his power of reasoning, and elevation of sentiment, disclosed in language of rare precision, strength, and beauty, not seldom astonished his old friends. Neither of the two champions could have found a more formidable antagonist than each now met in the other. Douglas was by far the most conspicu ous member of his party. His admirers had dubbed him "the little giant," contrasting in that nick name the greatness of his mind with the smallness of his body. But though of low stature, his broad- shouldered figure appeared uncommonly sturdy, and there was something lion-like in the square ness of his brow and jaw, and in the defiant shake of his long hair. His loud and persistent advocacy 74 ABRAHAM LINCOLN of territorial expansion, in the name of patriotism and "manifest destiny," had given him an enthu siastic following among the young and ardent. Great natural parts, a highly combative tempera ment, and long training had made him a debater unsurpassed in a Senate filled with able men. He could be as forceful in his appeals to patriotic feelings as he was fierce in denunciation and thor oughly skilled in all the baser tricks of parliamen tary pugilism. While genial and rollicking in his social intercourse, — the idol of the "boys," — he felt himself one of the most renowned statesmen of his time, and would frequently meet his oppo nents with an overbearing haughtiness, as persons more to be pitied than to be feared. In his speech opening the campaign of 1858, he spoke of Lin coln, whom the Republicans had dared to advance as their candidate for " his " place in the Senate, with an air of patronizing if not contemptuous con descension, as " a kind, amiable, and intelligent gentleman and a good citizen." The little giant would have been pleased to pass off his antagonist as a tall dwarf. He knew Lincoln too well, how ever, to indulge himself seriously in such a delusion. But the political situation was at that moment in a curious tangle, and Douglas could expect to ABRAHAM LINCOLN 75 derive from the confusion great advantage over his opponent. By the repeal ofthe Missouri Compromise, open ing the Territories to the ingress of slavery, Doug las had pleased the South, but greatly alarmed the North. He had sought to conciliate Northern sen timent by appending to his Kansas-Nebraska bill the declaration that its intent was " not to legislate slavery into any State or Territory, nor to exclude it therefrom, but to leave the people thereof per fectly free to form and regulate their institutions in their own way, subject only to the Constitution of the United States." This he called " the great principle of popular sovereignty." When asked whether, under this act, the people of a Territory, before its admission as a State, would have the right to exclude slavery, he answered, " That is a ques tion for the courts to decide." Then came the fa mous "Dred Scott decision," in which the Supreme Court held substantially that the right to hold slaves as property existed in the Territories by virtue of the Federal Constitution, and that this right could not be denied by any act of a territorial govern ment. This, of course, denied the right ofthe peo ple of any Territory to exclude slavery while they were in a territorial condition, and it alarmed the 76 ABRAHAM LINCOLN Northern people still more. Douglas recognized the binding force of the decision of the Supreme Court, at the same time maintaining, most illogi- cally, that his great principle of popular sover eignty remained in force nevertheless. Meanwhile, the pro-slavery people of western Missouri, the so- called "border ruffians," had invaded Kansas, set up a constitutional convention, made a constitu tion of an extreme pro-slavery type, the "Lecomp ton Constitution," refused to submit it fairly to a vote of the people of Kansas, and then referred it to Congress for acceptance, — seeking thus to accomplish the admission of Kansas as a slave State. Had Douglas supported such a scheme, he would have lost all foothold in the North. In the name of popular sovereignty he loudly declared his op position to the acceptance of any constitution not sanctioned by a formal popular vote. He " did not care," he said, "whether slavery be voted up or down," but there must be a fair vote of the people. Thus he drew upon himself the hostility of the Buchanan administration, which was controlled by the pro-slavery interest, but he saved his Northern following. More than this, not only did his Demo cratic admirers now call him " the true champion of freedom," but even some Republicans of large ABRAHAM LINCOLN 77 influence, prominent among them Horace Greeley, sympathizing with Douglas in his fight against the Lecompton Constitution, and hoping to detach him permanently from the pro-slavery interest and to force a lasting breach in the Democratic party, seri ously advised the Republicans of Illinois to give up their opposition to Douglas, and to help reelect him to the Senate. Lincoln was not of that opinion. He believed that great popular movements can succeed only when guided by their faithful friends, and that the anti-slavery cause could not safely be intrusted to the keeping of one who " did not care whether slavery be voted up or down." This opinion prevailed in Illinois ; but the influences within the Republican party, over which it prevailed, yielded only a reluctant acquiescence, if they acquiesced at all, after having materially strengthened Douglas's position. Such was the situation of things when the campaign of 1 858 between Lincoln and Doug las began. Lincoln opened the campaign on his side, at the convention which nominated him as the Republican candidate for the senatorship, with a memorable saying which sounded like a shout from the watch- tower of history : " A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot 78 ABRAHAM LINCOLN endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved. I do not expect the house to fall, but I expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the pub lic mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction ; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, — old as well as new, North as well as South." Then he proceeded to point out that the Nebraska doctrine combined with the Dred Scott decision worked in the direction of making the nation "all slave." Here was the "irrepressible conflict" spoken of by Seward a short time later, in a speech made famous mainly by that phrase. If there was any new discovery in it, the right of priority was Lincoln's. This utterance proved not only his statesmanlike conception of the issue, but also, in his situation as a candidate, the firmness of his moral courage. The friends to whom he had read the draught of this speech before he delivered it warned him anxiously that its delivery might be fatal to his success in the election. This was shrewd advice, in the ordinary sense. While a slaveholder could threaten disunion with impunity, the mere ABRAHAM LINCOLN 79 suggestion that the existence of slavery was incom patible with freedom in the Union would hazard the political chances of any public man in the North. But Lincoln was inflexible. "It is true," said he, " and I will deliver it as written. ... I would rather be defeated with these expressions in my speech held up and discussed before the people than be vic torious without them." The statesman was right in his far-seeing judgment and his conscientious statement of the truth, but the practical politicians were also right in their prediction ofthe immediate effect. Douglas instantly seized upon the declara tion that a house divided against itself cannot stand as the main objective point of his attack, interpret ing it as an incitement to a "relentless sectional war," and there is no doubt that the persistent reit eration of this charge served to frighten not a few timid souls. Lincoln constantly endeavored to bring the moral and philosophical side of the subject to the foreground. " Slavery is wrong" was the keynote of all his speeches. To Douglas's glittering sophism that the right of the people of a Territory to have slavery or not, as they might desire, was in accord ance with the principle of true popular sovereignty, he made the pointed answer: "Then true popular 80 ABRAHAM LINCOLN sovereignty, according to Senator Douglas, means that, when one man makes another man his slave, no third man shall be allowed to object." To Douglas's argument that the principle which de manded that the people of a Territory should be permitted to choose whether they would have slav ery or not "originated when God made man, and placed good and evil before him, allowing him to choose upon his own responsibility," Lincoln sol emnly replied : "No; God did not place good and evil before man, telling him to make his choice. On the contrary, God did tell him there was one tree of the fruit of which he should not eat, upon pain of death." He did not, however, place him self on the most advanced ground taken by the rad ical anti-slavery men. He admitted that, under the Constitution, "the Southern people were entitled to a congressional fugitive slave law," although he did not approve the fugitive slave law then existing. He declared also that, if slavery were kept out of the Territories during their territorial existence, as it should be, and if then the people of any Territory, having a fair chance and a clear field, should do such an extraordinary thing as to adopt a slave con stitution, uninfluenced by the actual presence of the institution among them, he saw no alternative ABRAHAM LINCOLN 81 but to admit such a Territory into the Union. He declared further that, while he should be exceed ingly glad to see slavery abolished in the District of Columbia, he would, as a member of Congress, with his present views, not endeavor to bring on that abolition except on condition that emancipa tion be gradual, that it be approved by the deci sion of a majority of voters in the District, and that compensation be made to unwilling owners. On every available occasion, he pronounced himself in favor of the deportation and colonization of the blacks, of course with their consent. He repeatedly disavowed any wish on his part to have social and political equality established between whites and blacks. On this point he summed up his views in a reply to Douglas's assertion that the Declaration of Independence, in speaking of all men as being created equal, did not include the negroes, saying : "I do not understand the Declaration of Independ ence to mean that all men were created equal in all respects. They are not equal in color. But I believe that it does mean to declare that all men are equal in some respects; they are equal in their right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." With regard to some of these subjects Lincoln modified his position at a later period, and it has 82 ABRAHAM LINCOLN been suggested that he would have professed more advanced principles in his debates with Douglas, had he not feared thereby to lose votes. This view can hardly be sustained. Lincoln had the courage of his opinions, but he was not a radical. The man who risked his election by delivering, against the urgent protest of his friends, the speech about "the house divided against itself" would not have shrunk from the expression of more extreme views, had he really entertained them. It is only fair to assume that he said what at the time he really thought, and that if, subsequently, his opinions changed, it was owing to new conceptions of good policy and of duty brought forth by an entirely new set of cir cumstances and exigencies. It is characteristic that he continued to adhere to the impracticable colo nization plan even after the Emancipation Procla mation had already been issued. But in this contest Lincoln proved himself not only a debater, but also a political strategist of the first order. The "kind, amiable, and intelligent gentleman," as Douglas had been pleased to call him, was by no means as harmless as a dove. He pos sessed an uncommon share of that worldly shrewd ness which not seldom goes with genuine simplicity of character; and the political experience gathered /,s,r,i/// ,///?¦/ ./>-//e/'/r/. //"' O'/r/Ar// or/, 7n//r/» ABRAHAM LINCOLN 83 in the legislature and in Congress and in many election campaigns, added to his keen intuitions, had made him as far-sighted a judge ofthe proba ble effects of a public man's sayings or doings upon the popular mind, and as accurate a calculator in estimating political chances and forecasting results, as could be found among the party managers in Illinois. And now he perceived keenly the ugly dilemma in which Douglas found himself, between the Dred Scott decision, which declared the right to hold slaves to exist in the Territories by virtue ofthe Federal Constitution, and his "great prin ciple of popular sovereignty," according to which the people of a Territory, if they saw fit, were to have the right to exclude slavery therefrom. Doug las was twisting and squirming to the best of his ability to avoid the admission that the two were in compatible. The question then presented itself if it would be good policy for Lincoln to force Doug las to a clear expression of his opinion as to whether, the Dred Scott decision notwithstanding, "the peo ple of a Territory could in any lawful way exclude slavery from its limits prior to the formation of a state constitution." Lincoln foresaw and predicted what Douglas would answer: that slavery could not exist in a Territory unless the people desired it 84 ABRAHAM LINCOLN and gave it protection by territorial legislation. In an improvised caucus the policy of pressing the interrogatory on Douglas was discussed. Lincoln's friends unanimously advised against it, because the answer foreseen would sufficiently commend Doug las to the people of Illinois to insure his reelection to the Senate. But Lincoln persisted. "I am after larger game," said he. "If Douglas so answers, he can never be President, and the battle of i860 is worth a hundred of this." The interrogatory was pressed upon Douglas, and Douglas did answer that, no matter what the decision ofthe Supreme Court might be on the abstract question, the people of a Territory had the lawful means to introduce or exclude slavery by territorial legislation friendly or unfriendly to the institution. Lincoln found it easy to show the absurdity of the proposition that, if slavery were admitted to exist of right in the Ter ritories by virtue of the supreme law, the Federal Constitution, it could be kept out or expelled by an inferior law, one made by a territorial legisla ture. Again the judgment of the politicians, hav ing only the nearest object in view, proved correct : Douglas was reelected to the Senate. But Lincoln's judgment proved correct also: Douglas, by resort ing to the expedient of his "unfriendly legislation ABRAHAM LINCOLN 85 doctrine," forfeited his last chance of becoming President of the United States. He might have hoped to win, by sufficient atonement, his pardon from the South for his opposition to the Lecompton Constitution; but that he taught the people ofthe Territories a trick by which they could defeat what the pro-slavery men considered a constitutional right, and that he called that trick lawful, — this the slave power would never forgive. The breach between the Southern and the Northern demo cracy was thenceforth irremediable and fatal. The presidential election of i860 approached. The struggle in Kansas, and the debates in Con gress which accompanied it, and which not unfre quently provoked violent outbursts, continually stirred the popular excitement. Within the Demo cratic party raged the war of factions. The national Democratic convention met at Charleston on the 23d of April, i860. After a struggle often days between the adherents and the opponents of Doug las, during which the delegates from the cotton States had withdrawn, the convention adjourned without having nominated any candidates, to meet again in Baltimore on the 1 8 th of June. There was no prospect, however, of reconciling the hostile elements. It appeared very probable that the Bal- 86 ABRAHAM LINCOLN timore convention would nominate Douglas, while the seceding Southern Democrats would set up a candidate of their own, representing extreme pro- slavery principles. Meanwhile, the national Republican convention assembled at Chicago on the 16th of May, full of enthusiasm and hope. The situation was easily understood. The Democrats would have the South. In order to succeed in the election, the Republi cans had to win, in addition to the States carried by Fremont in 1856, those that were classed as "doubtful," — New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Indi ana, or Illinois in the place of either New Jersey or Indiana. The most eminent Republican states men and leaders of the time thought of for the presidency were Seward and Chase, both regarded as belonging to the more advanced order of anti- slavery men. Of the two, Seward had the largest following, mainly from New York, New England, and the Northwest. Cautious politicians doubted seriously whether Seward, to whom some phrases in his speeches had unreservedly given the reputa tion of a reckless radical, would be able to com mand the whole Republican vote in the doubtful States. Besides, during his long public career he had made enemies. It was evident that those who ABRAHAM LINCOLN 87 thought Seward's nomination too hazardous an ex periment would consider Chase unavailable for the same reason. They would then look round for an "available" man; and among the "available" men Abraham Lincoln was easily discovered to stand foremost. His great debate with Douglas had given him a national reputation. The people ofthe East being eager to see the hero of so dramatic a contest, he had been induced to visit several Eastern cities, and had astonished and delighted large and distin guished audiences with speeches of singular power and originality. An address delivered by him in the Cooper Institute in New York, before an audi ence containing a large number of important per sons, was then, and has ever since been, especially praised as one of the most logical and convincing political speeches ever made in this country. The people of the West had grown proud of him as a distinctively Western great man, and his popularity at home had some peculiar features which could be expected to exercise a potent charm. Nor was Lin coln's name as that of an available candidate left to the chance of accidental discovery. It is indeed not probable that he thought of himself as a presidential possibility, during his contest with Douglas for the senatorship. As late as April, 1 859, he had written 88 ABRAHAM LINCOLN to a friend who had approached him on the subject that he did not think himself fit for the presidency. The vice-presidency was then the limit of his ambi tion. But some of his friends in Illinois took the matter seriously in hand, and Lincoln, after some hesitation, then formally authorized "the use of his name." The matter was managed with such energy and excellent judgment that in the convention he had not only the whole vote of Illinois to start with, but won votes on all sides without offending any rival. A large majority ofthe opponents of Seward went over to Abraham Lincoln, and gave him the nomination on the third ballot. As had been fore seen, Douglas was nominated by one wing of the Democratic party at Baltimore, while the extreme pro-slavery wing put Breckinridge into the field as its candidate. After a campaign conducted with the energy of genuine enthusiasm on the anti-slavery side, the united Republicans defeated the divided Democrats, and Lincoln was elected President by a majority of fifty-seven votes in the electoral col leges. The result of the election had hardly been de clared when the disunion movement in the South, long threatened and carefully planned and pre pared, broke out in the shape of open revolt, and /('/*/? /t*r/// ^y^/tro//-/ ABRAHAM LINCOLN 89 nearly a month before Lincoln could be inau gurated as President of the United States, seven Southern States had adopted ordinances of seces sion, formed an independent confederacy, framed a constitution for it, and elected Jefferson Davis its president, expecting the other slaveholding States soon to join them. On the 1 ith of February, 1861, Lincoln left Springfield for Washington; having, with characteristic simplicity, asked his law partner not to change the sign of the firm " Lincoln and Herndon" during the four years' unavoidable ab sence of the senior partner, and having taken an affectionate and touching leave of his neighbors. The situation which confronted the new Presi dent was appalling: the larger part ofthe South in open rebellion, the rest of the slaveholding States wavering, preparing to follow; the revolt guided by determined, daring, and skillful leaders; the South ern people, apparently full of enthusiasm and mili tary spirit, rushing to arms, some of the forts and arsenals already in their possession; thegovernment ofthe Union, before the accession ofthe new Presi dent, in the hands of men some of whom actively sympathized with the revolt, while others were ham pered by their traditional doctrines in dealing with it, and really gave it aid and comfort by their irreso- 90 ABRAHAM LINCOLN lute attitude; all the departments full of "Southern sympathizers" and honeycombed with disloyalty; the treasury empty, and the public credit at the low est ebb; the arsenals ill supplied with arms, if not emptied by treacherous practices; the regular army of insignificant strength, dispersed over an immense surface, and deprived by defection of some of its best officers; the navy small and antiquated. But that was not all. The threat of disunion had so often been resorted to by the slave power in years gone by that most Northern people had ceased to believe in its seriousness. But when disunion actually ap peared as a stern reality, something like a chill swept through the whole Northern country. A cry for union and peace at any price rose on all sides. De mocratic partisanship reiterated this cry with vocif erous vehemence, and even many Republicans grew afraid of the victory they had just achieved at the ballot-box, and spoke of compromise. The country fairly resounded with the noise of "anti-coercion meetings." Expressions of firm resolution from de termined anti-slavery men were indeed not want ing, but they were for a while almost drowned by a bewildering confusion of discordant voices. Even this was not all. Potent influences in Europe, with an ill-concealed desire for the permanent disrup- ABRAHAM LINCOLN 91 tion of the American Union, eagerly espoused the cause of the Southern seceders, and the two princi pal maritime powers of the Old World seemed only to be waiting for a favorable opportunity to lend them a helping hand. This was the state of things to be mastered by "honest Abe Lincoln" when he took his seat in the presidential chair, — "honest Abe Lincoln," who was so good natured that he could not say "no;" the greatest achievement in whose life had been a debate on the slavery question; who had never been in any position of power; who was without the slightest experience of high executive duties, and who had only a speaking acquaintance with the men upon whose counsel and cooperation he was to depend. Nor was his accession to power under such circumstances greeted with general confidence even by the members of his party. While he had indeed won much popularity, many Republicans, especially among those who had advocated Seward's nomination for the presidency, with a feeling little short of dismay, saw the simple "Illinois lawyer" take the reins of government. The orators and journals of the opposition were ridiculing and lampooning him without measure. Many people actually wondered how such a man could dare to 92 ABRAHAM LINCOLN undertake a task which, as he himself had said to his neighbors in his parting speech, was "more diffi cult than that of Washington himself had been." But Lincoln brought to that task, aside from other uncommon qualities, the first requisite, — an intuitive comprehension of its nature. While he did not indulge in the delusion that the Union could be maintained or restored without a conflict of arms, he could indeed not foresee all the problems he would have to solve. He instinctively under stood, however, by what means that conflict would have to be conducted by the government of a demo cracy. He knew that the impending war, whether great or small, would not be like a foreign war, ex citing a united national enthusiasm, but a civil war, likely to fan to uncommon heat the animosities of party even in the localities controlled by the gov ernment; that this war would have to be carried on, not by means of a ready-made machinery, ruled by an undisputed, absolute will, but by means to be furnished by the voluntary action ofthe people: — armies to be formed by voluntary enlistment; large sums of money to be raised by the people, through their representatives, voluntarily taxing themselves; trusts of extraordinary power to be voluntarily granted; and war measures, not seldom restricting ABRAHAM LINCOLN 93 the rights and liberties to which the citizen was accustomed, to be voluntarily accepted and sub mitted to by the people, or at least a large majority of them; — and that this would have to be kept up, not merely during a short period of enthusias tic excitement, but possibly through weary years of alternating success and disaster, hope and de spondency. He knew that in order to steer this government by public opinion successfully through all the confusion created by the prejudices and doubts and differences of sentiment distracting the popular mind, and so to propitiate, inspire, mould, organize, unite, and guide the popular will that it might give forth all the means required for the per formance of his great task, he would have to take into account all the influences strongly affecting the current of popular thought and feeling, and to direct while appearing to obey. This was the kind of leadership he intuitively conceived to be needed when a free people were to be led forward en masse to overcome a great com mon danger under circumstances of appalling dif ficulty, — the leadership which does not dash ahead with brilliant daring, no matter who follows, but which is intent upon rallying all the available forces, gathering in the stragglers, closing up the column, 94 ABRAHAM LINCOLN so that the front may advance well supported. For this leadership Abraham Lincoln was admirably fit ted, — better than any other American statesman of his day ; for he understood the plain people, with all their loves and hates, their prejudices and their noble impulses, their weaknesses and their strength, as he understood himself, and his sym pathetic nature was apt to draw their sympathy to him. His inaugural address foreshadowed his ofiicial course in characteristic manner. Although yield ing nothing in point of principle, it was by no means a flaming anti-slavery manifesto, such as would have pleased the more ardent Republicans. It was rather the entreaty of a sorrowing father speaking to his wayward children. In the kindliest language he pointed out to the secessionists how ill-advised their attempt at disunion was, and why, for their own sakes, they should desist. Almost plaintively he told them that, while it was not their duty to destroy the Union, it was his sworn duty to preserve it; that the least he could do, under the obligations of his oath, was to possess and hold the property ofthe United States ; that he hoped to do this peaceably; that he abhorred war for any pur pose, and that they would have none unless they ABRAHAM LINCOLN 95 themselves were the aggressors. It was a master piece of persuasiveness; and while Lincoln had accepted many valuable amendments suggested by Seward, it was essentially his own. Probably Lin coln himself did not expect his inaugural address to have any effect upon the secessionists, for he must have known them to be resolved upon disunion at any cost. But it was an appeal to the wavering minds in the North, and upon them it made a pro found impression. Every candid man, however timid and halting, had to admit that the President was bound by his oath to do his duty; that under that oath he could do no less than he said he would do; that if the secessionists resisted such an appeal as the President had made, they were bent upon mischief, and that the government must be sup ported against them. The partisan sympathy with the Southern insurrection which still existed in the North did indeed not disappear, but it diminished perceptibly under the influence of such reasoning. Those who still resisted it did so at the risk of appearing unpatriotic. It must not be supposed, however, that Lincoln at once succeeded in pleasing everybody, even among his friends, — even among those nearest to him. In selecting his cabinet, which he did substantially be- 96 ABRAHAM LINCOLN fore he left Springfield for Washington, he thought it wise to call to his assistance the strong men of his party, especially those who had given evidence of the support they commanded as his competitors in the Chicago convention. In them he found at the same time representatives of the different shades of opinion within the party, and of the different ele ments — former Whigs and former Democrats — from which the party had recruited itself. This was sound policy under the circumstances. It might in deed have been foreseen that among the members of a cabinet so composed, troublesome disagreements and rivalries would break out. But it was better for the President to have these strong and ambitious men near him as his cooperators than to have them as his critics in Congress, where their differences might have been composed in a common opposi tion to him. As members of his cabinet he could hope to control them, and to keep them busily employed in the service of a common purpose, if he had the strength to do so. Whether he did pos sess this strength was soon tested by a singularly rude trial. There can be no doubt that the foremost mem bers of his cabinet, Seward and Chase, the most eminent Republican statesmen, had felt themselves ABRAHAM LINCOLN 97 wronged by their party when in its national con vention it preferred to them for the presidency a man whom, not unnaturally, they thought greatly their inferior in ability and experience as well as in service. The soreness of that disappointment was intensified when they saw this Western man in the White House, with so much of rustic manner and speech as still clung to him, meeting his fellow citi zens, high and low, on a footing of equality, with the simplicity of his good nature unburdened by any conventional dignity of deportment, and deal ing with the great business of state in an easy-going, unmethodical, and apparently somewhat irreverent way. They did not understand such a man. Espe cially Seward, who, as Secretary of State, considered himselfnext to the Chief Executive, and who quickly accustomed himself to giving orders and making arrangements upon his own motion, thought it ne cessary that he should rescue the direction of public affairs from hands so unskilled, and take full charge of them himself. At the end of the first month of the administration he submitted a "memorandum" to President Lincoln, which has been first brought to light by Nicolay and Hay, and is one of their most valuable contributions to the history of those days. In that paper Seward actually told the Presi- 98 ABRAHAM LINCOLN dent that, at the end of a month's administration, the government was still without a policy, either do mestic or foreign; that the slavery question should be eliminated from the struggle about the Union ; that the matter ofthe maintenance ofthe forts and other possessions in the South should be decided with that view ; that explanations should be de manded categorically from the governments of Spain and France, which were then preparing, one for the annexation of San Domingo, and both for the invasion of Mexico; that if no satisfactory ex planations were received, war should be declared against Spain and France by the United States; that explanations should also be sought from Russia and Great Britain, and a vigorous continental spirit of independence against European intervention be aroused all over the American continent; that this policy should be incessantly pursued and directed by somebody; that either the President should de vote himself entirely to it, or devolve the direction on some member of his cabinet, whereupon all debate on this policy must end. This could be understood only as a formal de mand that the President should acknowledge his own incompetency to perform his duties, content himself with the amusement of distributing post- ABRAHAM LINCOLN 99 offices, and resign his power as to all important affairs into the hands of his Secretary of State. It seems to-day incomprehensible how a statesman of Seward's calibre could at that period conceive a plan of policy in which the slavery question had no place ; a policy which rested upon the utterly delusive assumption that the secessionists, who had already formed their Southern Confederacy, and were with stern resolution preparing to fight for its independence, could be hoodwinked back into the Union by some sentimental demonstration against European interference; a policy which, at that crit ical moment, would have involved the Union in a foreign war, thus inviting foreign intervention in favor ofthe Southern Confederacy, and increasing tenfold its chances in the struggle for independence. But it is equally incomprehensible how Seward could fail to see that this demand of an uncondi tional surrender was a mortal insult to the head of the government, and that by putting his proposi tion on paper he delivered himself into the hands ofthe very man he had insulted; for had Lincoln, as most Presidents would have done, instantly dis missed Seward, and published the true reason for that dismissal, it would inevitably have been the end of Seward's career. But Lincoln did what not ioo ABRAHAM LINCOLN many of the noblest and greatest men in history would have been noble and great enough to do. He considered that Seward, if rightly controlled, was still capable of rendering great service to his country in the place in which he was. He ignored the insult, but firmly established his superiority. In his reply, which he forthwith dispatched, he told Seward that the administration had a domestic policy as laid down in the inaugural address with Seward's approval ; that it had a foreign policy as traced in Seward's dispatches with the President's approval; that if any policy was to be maintained or changed, he, the President, was to direct that on his responsibility; and that in performing that duty the President had a right to the advice of his sec retaries. Seward's fantastic schemes of foreign war and continental policies Lincoln brushed aside by passing them over in silence. Nothing more was said. Seward must have felt that he was at the mercy of a superior man ; that his offensive proposition had been generously pardoned as a temporary ab erration of a great mind, and that he could atone for it only by devoted personal loyalty. This he did. He was thoroughly subdued, and thenceforth submitted to Lincoln his dispatches for revision and amendment without a murmur. The war with ABRAHAM LINCOLN 101 European nations was no longer thought of; the slavery question found in due time its proper place in the struggle for the Union; and when, at a later period, the dismissal of Seward was demanded by dissatisfied senators who attributed to him the shortcomings of the administration, Lincoln stood stoutly by his faithful Secretary of State. Chase, the Secretary of the Treasury, a man of superb presence, of eminent ability and ardent pa triotism, of great natural dignity and a certain out ward coldness of manner, which made him appear more difficult of approach than he really was, did not permit his disappointment to burst out in such extravagant demonstrations. But Lincoln's ways were so essentially different from his that they never became quite intelligible, and certainly not congen ial to him. It might, perhaps, have been better had there been, at the beginning ofthe administration, some decided clash between Lincoln and Chase, as there was between Lincoln and Seward, to bring on a full mutual explanation, and to make Chase appreciate the real seriousness of Lincoln's nature. But as it was, their relations always remained some what formal, and Chase never felt quite at ease under a chief whom he could not understand, and whose character and powers he never learned to 102 ABRAHAM LINCOLN esteem at their true value. At the same time, he devoted himself zealously to the duties of his de partment, and did the country arduous service under circumstances of extreme difficulty. Nobody recognized this more heartily than Lincoln him self, and they managed to work together until near the end of Lincoln's first presidential term, when Chase, after some disagreements concerning ap pointments to office, resigned from the treasury; and after Taney's death, the President made him Chief Justice. The rest of the cabinet consisted of men of less eminence, who subordinated themselves more easily. In January, 1862, Lincoln found it necessary to bow Cameron out of the war office, and to put in his place Edwin M. Stanton, a man of intensely practical mind, vehement impulses, fierce positive- ness, ruthless energy, immense working power, lofty patriotism, and severest devotion to duty. He ac cepted the war office, not as a partisan, for he had never been a Republican, but only to do all he could in "helping to save the country." The man ner in which Lincoln succeeded in taming this lion to his will, by frankly recognizing his great quali ties, by giving him the most generous confidence, by aiding him in his work to the full of his power, f /J y / / / -y /- ¦ /.///oo/// a.// a // ABRAHAM LINCOLN 103 by kindly concession or affectionate persuasiveness in cases of differing opinions, or, when it was neces sary, by firm assertions of superior authority, bears the highest testimony to his skill in the management of men. Stanton, who had entered the service with rather a mean opinion of Lincoln's character and capacity, became one of his warmest, most devoted, and most admiring friends, and with none of his secretaries was Lincoln's intercourse more intimate. To take advice with candid readiness, and to weigh it without any pride of his own opinion, was one of Lincoln's preeminent virtues ; but he had not long presided over his cabinet council when his was felt by all its members to be the ruling mind. The cautious policy foreshadowed in his inau gural address, and pursued during the first period of the civil war, was far from satisfying all his party friends. The ardent spirits among the Union men thought that the whole North should at once be called to arms, to crush the rebellion by one power ful blow. The ardent spirits among the anti-slav ery men insisted that, slavery having brought forth the rebellion, this powerful blow should at once be aimed at slavery. Both complained that the admin istration was spiritless, undecided, and lamentably slow in its proceedings. Lincoln reasoned other- 104 ABRAHAM LINCOLN wise. The ways of thinking and feeling ofthe masses, ofthe plain people, were constantly present to his mind. The masses, the plain people, had to furnish the men for the fighting, if fighting was to be done. He believed that the plain people would be ready to fight when it clearly appeared necessary, and that they would feel that necessity when they felt them selves attacked. He therefore waited until the ene mies of the Union struck the first blow. As soon as, on the 1 2 th of April, 1 86 1, the first gun was fired in Charleston harbor on the Union flag upon Fort Sumter, the call was sounded, and the Northern people rushed to arms. Lincoln knew that the plain people were now indeed ready to fight in defense of the Union, but not yet ready to fight for the destruction of slavery. He declared openly that he had a right to summon the people to fight for the Union, but not to sum mon them to fight for the abolition of slavery as a primary object; and this declaration gave him num berless soldiers for the Union who at that period would have hesitated to do battle against the insti tution of slavery. For a time he succeeded in ren dering harmless the cry of the partisan opposition that the Republican administration was perverting the war for the Union into an "abolition war." But ABRAHAM LINCOLN 105 when he went so far as to countermand the acts of some generals in the field, looking to the emanci pation of the slaves in the districts covered by their commands, loud complaints arose from earnest anti- slavery men, who accused the President of turning his back upon the anti-slavery cause. Many of these anti-slavery men will now, after a calm retrospect, be willing to admit that it would have been a haz ardous policy to endanger, by precipitating a de monstrative fight against slavery, the success of the struggle for the Union. Lincoln's views and feelings concerning slavery had not changed. Those who conversed with him intimately upon the subject at that period know that he did not expect slavery long to survive the triumph ofthe Union, even if it were not immedi ately destroyed by the war. In this he was right. Had the Union armies achieved a decisive victory in an early period ofthe conflict, and had the seceded States been received back with slavery, the " slave power" would then have been a defeated power, — defeated in an attempt to carry out its most effec tive threat. It would have lost its prestige. Its menaces would have been hollow sound, and ceased to make any one afraid. It could no longer have hoped to expand, to maintain an equilibrium in any 106 ABRAHAM LINCOLN branch of Congress,and to control the government. The victorious free States would have largely over balanced it. It would no longer have been able to withstand the onset of a hostile age. It could no longer have ruled, — and slavery had to rule in order to live. It would have lingered for a while, but it would surely have been "in the course of ulti mate extinction." A prolonged war precipitated the destruction of slavery; a short war might only have prolonged its death struggle. Lincoln saw this clearly; but he saw also that, in a protracted death struggle, it might still have kept disloyal sentiments alive, bred distracting commotions, and caused great mischief to the country. He therefore hoped that slavery would not survive the war. But the question how he could rightfully employ his power to bring on its speedy destruction was to him not a question of mere sentiment. He himself set forth his reasoning upon it, at a later period, in one of his inimitable letters. "I am naturally anti- slavery," said he. " If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I cannot remember the time when I did not so think and feel. And yet I have never under stood that the presidency conferred upon me an un restricted right to act upon that judgment and feel ing. It was in the oath I took that I would, to the ABRAHAM LINCOLN 107 best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it my view that I might take an oath to get power, and break the oath in using that power. I understood, too, that, in ordinary civil administration, this oath even forbade me practically to indulge my private abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I did understand, however, also, that my oath im posed upon me the duty of preserving, to the best of my ability, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which the Constitu tion was the organic law. I could not feel that, to the best of my ability, I had even tried to preserve the Constitution if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution all together." In other words, if the salvation ofthe government, the Con stitution, and the Union demanded the destruction of slavery, he felt it to be not only his right, but his sworn duty to destroy it. Its destruction became a necessity of the war for the Union. As the war dragged on and disaster followed dis aster, the sense of that necessity steadily grew upon him. Early in 1 862, as some of his friends well re- member,he saw, what Seward seemed not to see, that 108 ABRAHAM LINCOLN to give the war for the Union an anti-slavery charac ter was the surest means to prevent the recognition of the Southern Confederacy as an independent nation by European powers; that, slavery being abhorred by the moral sense of civilized mankind, no European government would dare to offer so gross an insult to the public opinion of its people as openly to favor the creation of a state founded upon slavery to the prejudice of an existing nation fight ing against slavery. He saw also that slavery un touched was to the rebellion an element of power, and that in order to overcome that power it was necessary to turn it into an element of weakness. Still, he felt no assurance that the plain people were prepared for so radical a measure as the emancipa tion of the slaves by act of the government, and he anxiously considered that, if they were not, this great step might, by exciting dissension at the North, injure the cause of the Union in one quarter more than it would help it in another. He heartily wel comed an effort made in New York to mould and stimulate public sentiment on the slavery question by public meetings boldly pronouncing for eman cipation. At the same time he himself cautiously advanced with a recommendation, expressed in a special message to Congress, that the United States ABRAHAM LINCOLN 109 should cooperate with any State which might adopt the gradual abolishment of slavery, giving such State pecuniary aid to compensate the former owners of emancipated slaves. The discussion was started, and spread rapidly. Congress adopted the resolution recommended, and soon went a step farther in passing a bill to abolish slavery in the District of Co lumbia. The plain people began to look at emanci pation on a larger scale, as a thing to be considered seriously by patriotic citizens ; and soon Lincoln thought that the time was ripe, and that the edict of freedom could be ventured upon without danger of serious confusion in the Union ranks. The failure of McCleUan's movement upon Rich mond increased immensely the prestige of the en emy. The need of some great act to stimulate the vitality of the Union cause seemed to grow daily more pressing. On July 21, 1862, Lincoln sur prised his cabinet with the draught of a proclama tion declaring free the slaves in all the States that should be still in rebellion against the United States on the 1 st of January, 1863. As to the matter itself he announced that he had fully made up his mind; he invited advice only concerning the form and the time of publication. Seward suggested that the proclamation, if then brought out, amidst disaster no ABRAHAM LINCOLN and distress, would sound like the last shriek of a perishing cause. Lincoln accepted the suggestion, and the proclamation was postponed. Another defeat followed, the second at Bull Run. But when,after that battle, the Confederate army,under Lee, crossed the Potomac and invaded Maryland, Lincoln vowed in his heart that, if the Union army were now blessed with success, the decree of free dom should surely be issued. The victory of Antie tam was won on September 17, and the prelimi nary Emancipation Proclamation came forth on the 2 2d. It was Lincoln's own resolution and act; but practically it bound the nation, and permit ted no step backward. In spite of its limitations, it was the actual abolition of slavery. Thus he wrote his name upon the books of history with the title dearest to his heart, — the liberator ofthe slave. Itis true, the great proclamation, which stamped the war as one for "union and freedom," did not at once mark the turning of the tide on the field of military operations. There were more disasters, — Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville. But with Gettysburg and Vicksburg the whole aspect ofthe war changed. Step by step, now more slowly, then more rapidly, but with increasing steadiness, the flag of the Union advanced from field to field toward ^yr1^--6-^fy&/rhj f^LM^o