YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY A N I N a U I R Y INTO THE BEAUTIES of PAINTING; AND INTO THE M E R I T S OF THE MOST CELEBRATED PAINTERS, Ancient and Modern. L I ' ¦ -J— r rni j By D A N I E L WEBB, Efq. Ofi; fin ao-Tra^arai T&w £uy%u tron^ the Several authors on this Subject, I cannot fay, that I havt received ftom them the instruction I expected. A. This Dial. I. General Plan of the Work. 3 A. This does not proceed from a want of capacity in them, but from a defect in their plans : they are, as you know, bio graphers ; and, as the perfons whole lives they write, are all of one profeffion, the continued fepetitioii of the fame thoughts, and of the fame technical terms* tire and' diftract the reader. There is another ob jection to their manner of writing -, their ideas, however juft, are fb Scattered through the different parts of their works, that they are not eafily reducible to any fyftem. In the exposition of an art, as in the distribu tion of a picture, a loofe difperfion of the objects, confounds both the eye and the understanding. But, thefe writers are fub- ject to a Still greater difadvantage ; for, as the painters whole talents they defcribe, if we except a very few, excelled much more in the mechanick, than in the ideal part of painting, it throws the force of theft observations on that point, with which, B z we, 4 General Plan of the Work. Dial. .1 we, who are but obfervers of the art, have the leaft to do. B. Though I understand very well the terms mechanick and ideal, in their ge neral acceptation, yet, 1 wifh you would explain them, in their particular relation to the fubject before us. A. We may confider the imitative arts in two points of view ; ifl, As imitations of fuch objects as are actually before the eye ; 2dly, As reprefentations of thofe images- which are formed by the fancy. The firft , is the mechanick or executive part of the art ; the fecond, the ideal or inventive. [a] Tully has juftly distinguished thofe [«] Nee verd ille artifex, quum faceret Jovis form- am aut Minervae, contemplabatur aliquem e quo firni- litudinem duceret ; fed ipfius in mente infidebat fpe- cies pulchritudinis eximia quxdam, quam intuens, in caque defixus, ad illius fimilitudinem artem et manum dirigebat. In Br u to. parts, Dial. I. General Plan of the I Fork. 5 parts, when he obferves, that the Jupiter of Phidias was not drawn from any pattern in nature, but from that idea of unexam- ' pled beauty, which the artift had fom:ed in his mind. The great difference, ob- ferved among painters of any name, arifes from their different excellencies in thefe two parts : thofe, whofe chief merit is in the mechanick, will, like the Dutch painters, be fervile copiers of the works of nature -, but thofe, who give wholly into the ideal, without perfecting themfelves in the me chanick, will produce \b~\ fbozzo's, not pictures : it is evident then, that the per fection of the art confifls in an union of thefe two parts. Of all the moderns, Ra phael feems to have come the neareft to this point. The next to him is, perhaps, Qorreggio. I have faid perhaps, becaufe, though there is no great variety in his [i] The rough draught of a pi&ure. B 3 ideas, 6 Genreal Plan of the Work. Dial, I. ideas, yet are they fometimes fo happy, at tended with fuch grace, and executed with fuch truth, that, as there is no one artift, whofe paintings we fee with more pleafure, fo is there no one, whofe impreffions we re ceive more warmly, or remember longer ; and this kit is the teft of perfect painting. But before I enter further into our fubject, it may not be improper, to lay before you the. method I propofe to obferve. Firft then, we will examine our capacity to judge of the imitative arts •, to determine which, we muft previously fix the limits between tafte and fcience. In the next place, we may confider the true value of thefe arts,, which muft be estimated, by their antiquity, their degree of credit with every polite nation, and, above all, by their ufefujnefs to focie- ty. I Shall then divide paiating, which is our principal object, into its four leading branches, namely, defign, colouring, clear obfcure, and compoficion. Concerning each of Dial. I. General Plan of the Work. y of thefe, I Shall endeavour to point out its different begyiies and ends ; how far the an cients feem to have attained thofe ends ; and of courfe, what light they muft Stand in, on a comparison with the moderns: One Satisfaction you will have in this pro- grefs, that, almoft every Step we take, will be on claffick ground j and, as ail the testimonies I ufe, or lights I borrow, are from the heft writers of antiquity, the vi vacity and good fenfe in their remarks, will at once entertain, and guide us in our pur- fuir. As the day is now too far Spent to enter upon our fubject, to-morrow, if you pleafe, we will begin ; and dedicate a morn ing to each of the divisions, in the order I juft now Seated them. B 4 DIA- DIALOGUE II. Of our Capacity to judge of Painting. [f] rr^HE learned, fays Quintilian, know JL the principles of an art, the illi terate its effects. He has, in thefe words, fixed the boundaries between tafte and fci- ence. Were I to define the former, I Should fay, [J] that tafte was a facility in the mind [c] Dodli rationem artis intelligunt, indodti volupta- 1 tern. Lib. ix. 4. [d] Many writers have oppofed judgment to tafte, as if they were diftinft faculties of the mind ; but this muft be a miftake : The fource of tafte is feeling, fo is it of judgment, whick is nothing more than this fame fenfibility, improved by the ftudy of its proper objefts, and brought to a juft point of certainty and correctnefs. Thus it is clear, that thefe are but diffe rent degrees of the fame faculty, and that they are exercifed wholly on our own ideas ; but, fcience is the remembrance or affemb!age of the ideas of others r to Dial. II. Our Capacity to judge, &c. 9 to be moved by what is excellent in an / art-, it is a feeling of the truth. Bur, fcience is to be informed of that truth, and of the means by which its effects are pro duced. It is eafy to conceive, that, dif ferent as thefe principles may be in their fetting out, they muft often unite in their decifions : This agreement will occafion their being mistaken one for the other, which is the cafe, when it is affirmed, that no one but an artift can form a right judgment of fculpture or painting. This maxim may hold indeed with refpect to the mechanick of an art, but not at all as to its effects ; the evidence and force of which, are what determine both the va lue of £he art, and merit of the artift. What [e] Tully obferves of an excellent and hence it fometimes happens, that men the moft remarkable for this kind of knowledge, are not equally fo, for their fenfibility. [/?] Id enim ipfum eft fummi oratoris, fummum oratorem populo videri. In Bruto. orator, »o Our Capacity lo~ judge BfAt.L IE orator, may as-juftly brfaidof an excel-* lent painter; his Superiority will be evi dent even to the leaft intelligent judges! But netther authority nor argument give1 a weight to our opiaidfl»,; touching any art we treat of, equal to the illustrations and examples which they lend each other. Happily, £/] the near affinity that is' obferved between the polite arts, they be ing indeed all but different means of ad dressing the fame paffions, makes this, at once, the; moft effectual and ready me thod of conveying our ideas. I find in Dionyfius HalicarnafTeus ah observation on rnufick much to my purpofe. [g\ «« I [/] Oauies artes, quas ad hjimanitatem perti nent, habent qDoddam commune wn,CHjlu^, et quafi cognationc inter fe continentur. Cic. pro Archia poeta. have $iau II. of Pa in ting. n have learned," fays he, " in theatres fill- " ed with a promifcuous and illiterace '"., crowd, what a kind of natural corre- " fpondence we all have with melody, " aqd the agreement of founds : Having " known the moft admired and able mu- " ficjan to be hiffed by the whole muki- " tucje, when he has Struck a fingje firing " out of turje, to the difturbance of nar- " mony ; yet, put this fame instrument " into the hands of one of thofe fimple- " tons, with orders to exprefs that note, " which he would exact from the artift, " he cannot do it. Whence is this ? The *' one is the effect: of fcience, the lot but " of a few; the other of feeling, which 3m BofvMiiia viro ts n-Xufls?, on //.lav jgofjsu ao-jp(pw.- mv «S«S3?> «V *rai situ Kftfvcrtxe tcv •JVwtsjv tstbv ti uv iviy.aihn tpis TE^tTusi; at .£g>atgrnfntpr, awrot Troiwai KctGavroL ra o^yata, ax. as Smairo, t> Sv VOTi ; on TSTo jus nrirupvc trw, ij; s itairtq (MTBi^ytpa.- (*!»" izmo h T,a9s{, S ircttnt avi^ugst » tp.vms. Pion. Halicarn. De ftrucTr. orat, fed. {i. " nature 12 ' Our Capacity to judge Dial. II, " nature has beftowed On all." This ap plies itfelf to our prefent fubject : The eye has its principle of correspondence with ¦what is juft, beautiful, and elegant: It acquires, like the ear, an [ h ] habitual delicacy ; and anfwers, with the fame fidelity and precifion, to the fineft im- preffions : Verfed in the works of the beft painters, it foon learns to distinguish true expreffions from falfe, and grace ;from affectation ; quickened by exercife, and confirmed by comparifon, it outstrips rea- foning ; and feels in an inftant that truth, which' the other developes by degrees. B. Yotr have been defcribing, what Tully calls a learned, and we, I think, may term a chafte eye. But, do you not, in this procefs, make the growth of taSte [£] Confuetudo oculorum. Cic. lib. vr. Acad. quaeft. to Dial. II. of Painting. 13 to be little more than a fenfitive vegeta tion, withdrawing it wholly from its de pendency on fcience ? A. Let us obferve its advances in poetry, as we have before in mufick : This too, will be the more decifive, as poetry is an union of the two powers of mufick and picture. In this, the imagina tion, on its firft fetting out, ever prefers extravagance to juflnefs, or falfe beauties to true ; it kindles at the flafhes of Clau- dian; and flutters at the points of Sta- tius; this is its childhood. As it grows in vigour, it refines in feeling; till, fu_ perior to its firft attractions, it refts on the tender pathetick of Virgil; or the manly fpirit of Lucretius. Exactly par allel to this, is the progrefs of the eye in painting ; its firft affections are always ill placed : it is enamoured with the fplen- did j 4. Our Capacity to judge Dial. ft. did impofitidns of Rubens, or the [f] the atrical grace of Guido ; this lafts not long ; it grows chafte in its purfuit •, and flight ing thofe falfe beauties, dwells on the native and mellow tints of Titian ; on the un forced attitudes, and elegant Simplicity of Raphael. Was this change, in both cafes,.. the refult of reafoning, or produced by a [0 The grace of Guido is rather technical that* ideal; by the firft is meant a certain flow of Contour, invariably applied to every character, and on every occafiori. Thus the daughter of Herodias r'eceive's the head of St. John, with the ftudied dignity of an attrefs ; and the victorious St. Michael, treads on the body of his antagonift, with all the precifion of a dancing mafter. By an ideal grace, I underftand that particular image, which in the inftant ftrikes a polite imagination, as peculiar to the action and character before it. Of this the Sanda Cecilia of Raphael, and the Magdalen in the St. Jerome of Cdreggid, are" the happieft examples: The gracefalnefs in thefe figures is not only proper to their characters-, but gives a fingular force and beauty to the expreffion. It was from this happinefs, that the venuftas of Apelles bec.-.me proverbial ,- as, among u?, any action that is Angularly graceful, is termed Coreggiefque* growing Dial. II. c/"Painting. i£ growing knowledge of the rules of each > art, we Should mark its advances ; the contrary of which is almoft ever the cafe ; fo that we are often furpifed at this altera tion in Ourfelves, afid Wonder, that the ideas and objects which affected us fo warmly at firftj Should, in a Short courfe of time, art fo coldly upon us : Nay, fome men there are* and thofe too very capable of judging in other matters, who never rife to this change j but continue, to the laft, Under the influence of the fame boyiSh and wanton imagination. B. The greatest difficulty in your fy- ftemj would be* to deduce the different degrees, as well as diverfity of our taftes* from this fame univerfal principle of feeling. A. The firft, I Should think, may be accounted for, from the different propor* tions of that fenfibility, as beftowed on us by 16 Our Capacity to judge Dial; ILV by nature, or improved by ourfelves : The fecond, from the diverfity in our imagina tions, in the direction given to them by education, and the constitutional or tem porary flow of the animal fpirits. But, as this is an inquiry quite beyond my reach, I Shall leave it to thofe, who can trace the progrefs of our ideas ; and can determine, and account for the various in fluences of outward objects on our fenfes. Inftead of lofing our time in fuch endlefs difquifitions, let us found our knowledge on facts ; and pafs from them to natural and ufcful conclusions. " The [k\ Lace- " demonians," fays Atheneus, " are no " where reprefented as being themfelves " muficians ; yet, the purity of their tafte " in this art, is univerfally acknowledged t " they having, at three different times, [&} Auxtoa.tjA.iHot, h f*EV ejiat^avov Tt!> [Ano-txw, sJev fa- ytsrw' oti h xpimt $vmv\a.t xtzhaq rm ri%>w, Sfto^oyetTai. *7otp* ctvruv ya.^ (pact t§is ijjbi cEcraxsiai Aaip9f(pa)(X£»»v au- tw. Athenseus, lib, xiii. Deipnofoph. c. 6. when .Dial. II. ©/.Painting. 17 " when it was corrupted and loft, reftored " and preferved it." The following ob servation by Tully, at the fame time that it illustrates, receives authority from this :fa<5t — " All [/] men, by a kind of tacit " feeling, without art or fcience, diftin- " guifh, in both cafes, what is right from. " what is wrong ; and, as they evidently do " fo in painting and fculpture, fo, &c. &c. And again : " It is wonderful, fays he, that, " feeing the difference is fo great between " the knowing and the ignorant, in the " practice of an art, that the difference " Should be fo far from great, in their " judgments concerning it." [/] Omnes enim tacito quodam fenfu, fine ulla arte aut ratione, qua; lint in artibus ac rationibus rec ta ac prava dijudicant j idque cum faciunt in picturis et in fignis, &c. &c. Mirabile eft, ciim plurimum in faciendo interfit in ter doctum et rudem, quam non multiim differat in judicando. De Oratore, lib. iii. C B. You 1 8 Our Capacity to judge Dial. II. B. You have, I think, fully establish ed the principle you contend for ; name ly, that we have all within us the feeds of tafte, and are capable, if we exercife our powers, of improving them into a fufficient knowledge of the polite arts. I am perfuaded, that nothing is a greater hinderance to our advances in any art, than the high opinion we form of the judg ment of its profeffors, and the propor tionable diffidence of our own. I have rarely met with an artift, who was not an implicit admirer of fome particular fchool, or a Slave to fome favourite manner. They feldom, like gentlemen and fcho- lars, rife to an unprejudiced and liberal contemplation of true beauty. The dif ficulties they find in the practice of their art, tie them down to the mechanick; at the fame time, that Self-love and va nity lead them into an admiration of thofe 4 Dial. II. «/Painting. i ttx"" lK $iutyo%*>i capuSuv afyoiiravlit Et; iitjMi&ui /Mat, xa\\o{ it vytis xcct afiov xat ^fjoT^vot avlo av\a tt;npya?cttlo' Kai ux av tvgotf trafha axgtGi; Mulct aXv&etui m.ya>-ptt\t fytoion* Opjyotlctt ya% ui Tfyw is xuXKtm. Max. Tyr. Differ, xxiii. ed. Lond. compositions: 4 A j.ujl proportion, and a manly grace, > Spread thro' his limbs, and kindled in his fate. Nature for once affum'd the fcu/ptor's part, And in a faulflefs beauty rivall'd art. And Philoftratus, Speaking of the beauty of Neoptolemus, remarks,, that it was as much inferior to that of his father Achilles, as the handfomeft men are to the fineft Statues. [e\ Grattts in ore vigor: cervix, humerique, manufque, Peftoraque artificum laudatis proxima fignis, px qua parte vir eft. Metam. lib. xii. Should Dial. IV. O/.Design. 43 Should we Still doubt of the truth or juft- nefs of the defcriptions, let us obferve the works which gave occafion to them. Let us contemplate the fine proportions, the Style of drawing in the Laocoon and Gla diator. Let us mark the fublime of the art, in the expreffive energy, the divine character of the Apollo. Let us dwell on the elegant beauties of the. Venus of Me- dicis. Thefe are the utmoft efforts of de fign: It can reach no farther than a full exertion of. grace, character, and beauty. We have, thus traced the genius of defign from its firft efiays to its full flight. But there is an [/] enthufiafm in every. art. The Greek Statuaries felt themfelves ftrait- tened within the out-lines of nature ; they invented new proportions, they conceived [/"] EiBas-taff/nov T«; TE%ni; ¦ utu kui « has E»9a- trtufla Jnf/Ha^yeii'. Suidas. new 44. Of D e s i g n. Dial. IV. new characters. The \g\ Jupiter and Mi nerva of Phidias were fubjects of aftoniSh- ment in the moft enlightened ages. It Ihould feem, that the Wonderful effect of thefe ftatues, proceeded from an union of the beautiful, with the great and uncom mon ; thus combining the whole influence of vifible objects on the imagination. If we are aftoniShed at the firft fight of the Coloffal ftatues on the monte Cavallo at Rome, a fecret and growing pleafure fucceeds this amazement : For, though the immenfity of their fdrm feems, at firft, to fet them above the fcale of our ideas, yet, fo happy is the fymmetry of their parts, fuch a freedom of defiga, fuch an aptnefs for action prevail throughout, that the eye foon becomes familiar with their propor tions, and capable of their beauties. [g] Non vidit Phidias Jovem, fecit tamen, velut tonantem ; nee ftetit ante oculos ejus Minerva, dignus tamen ilia arte animus, et concepit Deos et exhibuit. Senec. Rhet. lib. x. B. It Dial. IV. Of D e s i g n. 45 B. It is probable, that a great part of the pleafure which we receive in the con templation of fuch Coloffal figures, arifes from a comparifon of their proportions with our own. The mind, in thefe mo- Inents, grows ambitious ; and feels itfelf afpiring to greater powers, and fuperior functions : Thefe noble and exalted feel ings diffufe a kind of rapture through the foul ; and raife in it conceptions and aims above the limits of humanity. The fineft, and, at the fame time, moft pleafing fen- fations in nature, are thofe, which, (if I may be allowed the expreffion) carry us out of ourfelves, and bring us neareft to that di vine original from which we Spring. ' A. To this power of humanizing, if 1 1 may fo call it, thefe Coloffal proportions, \ fucceeds that of annexing the fublime to the moft minute. When two fuch extremes 4 correfpond 46 Of D e s i g n. Dial. TVV correspond in their effects, we may be affur- ed, that the merit in both fprings from the Same caufe, a [h] greatnefs of manner. The moft celebrated inftance in this kind, was the Hercules of Lyfippus ; which, though not more thani a foot in height, filled the imagination equal to the Hercules Farnefe. As this Statue is loft, we muft con tent ourfelves with the defcription of it by Statius [/]. At the chajle board the god himfelf appears, Infpires the artijl, and the banquet chears j He, only he, could teach thee to confine A great idea to minute defign ; [&] M^yaXoIs^irov. [z] Hsec inter caftaj genius tutelaque menfe Amphitryoniades, &c. • Deus ille, Deus : Sefeque videndura Indtilfit, Lyfippe, tibi, parvufque videri Sentirique ingens ; et cum mirabilis intra Stet menfura pedem, tamen exclamare libebit, (Si vifus per membra feras) hoc peftora preffus Vaftator Nemees, &'c. Lib. iv. Sylv. From DlA-t. IV. Of D E S I C Hi 4^ From part to part our beaUd fancy JTt-es, And gives to char a tier, what J pace denies y Prefs'd by that arm, the lion f ants for brtath\ And Cacus trembles at th' impending Jeal'L B. The Jupiter of Phidias, and Her cules of Lyfippus are equal examples of the fuperior genius of the Greeks ; and it muft be confeffed, that if they have im proved on nature, it was not fo much by quitting her proportions, as -excelling her ideas. WhenI reflect on this evident fupe- riority of the Greek artifts over the ancient and modern Roman, I am at a lots to ac count for it : I cannot attribute it wholly |o a pre-eminence of genius ; being un- . willing to believe, that nature could confine |rue tafte to fuch narrow boundaries: Aod :yet, if She is partial to particular ages, why may not She be fo to particular di- aaates ? ^Tms 48 Of D e s I c v. Dial. IV, A. This reflection is humbling; let us look, for a fecond caufe. [k] Seneca ob ferves, " That naked bodies, as they be- " tray their imperfections, fo they give a " full exhibition of their beauties : " Each of thefe effects tends to the improvement of defign. Clothing on the contrary, dif- guifes beauty, and gives a protection to faults. The [/ ] Greeks, it is known, al- moft ever reprefented their figures naked. But the Romans, whofe character was mi litary, dreffed theirs in armour. That art which challenges criticifm, muft always be fuperior to that which Shuns it. We are told by Pliny, \m\ " That Praxiteles had [k~] Nuda corpora, vitia fi qua fint, non celant, nee laudes parum oftentant. Lib. iii. Ep. 6. [/] Grajca res eft nihil velare ; at contra, Romana ac militaris, thoracas adhere. Plin. lib. xxxiv. c. 5. [02] Duas fecerat Veneres Praxiteles, fimulque, ven- debat; alteram velata fpecie, quamob id quidem made Dial, IV. 0/ Desig.n, 49 " made two ftatues of Venus, which he " fold at the fame time ; the one clothed ; " which for that reafon, was preferred by "the people of Cos : Thofe Of Gnidus " piirchafed that which was rejected. The " reputation of thefe ftatues was widely " different ; for by this laft Praxiteles en- " nobled Gnidqs." We may conceive then, that the Greeks had the fame advantage over th'e Romans, that the naked Venus had over the clothed : This advantage holds Still more Strongly againft the moderns; who, borrowing their characters and fub- jects from a chafte religion, are not only forced in decency to clothe their figures ; but often, by propriety, to make that cloth ing of the coarfeft materials. Hence it is, that, we often fee a .Saint bending under a load of drapery, and the elegant form of a prxtulerunt Coi ; rejeftam Gfiidii emerunt : Immen- $ differentia famfe 5 illo enim,figno Praxiteles nobi- litayit Qnidum. Lib- xxxvi, c. 5. E nun 50 Of D e s i g n. Dial. IV. nun overwhelmed in the blanketting of her order. If paint fometimes reprefents to us the naked body of a Chrift, it is either Stretched on a crofs, or disfigured by fuf- ferings; whilft the virgin-mother is hooded to the eyes, and the beauties of the Mag dalen are abforbed in velvet. The refult of this habit is evident, when our firft ar tifts come to defign the nud ; a comparison of Raphael's figures, in the incendio diBor- go, with the Laocoon or Gladiator, would have much the fame effect, as that of a Flemifh coach-horfe with an Arabian cour ier, B. It may be offered in this place, that as our fubjedts feldom admit the nud, we are not fuch great fufferers by a neglect of it. A. But this negligence has the worft effects, even where it feems protected ; for we Dial. IV. Of D e s i g n. $t we find, that our painters are much more happy in the difpbfition and caft of their draperies, than in the correctnefs of their defign ; and Raphael would not be fo much praifed, for giving us, in his clothed figures, a fair expreffion of form and pro portion, were not the contrary of this the general character of our painters. Thefe reflections have carried me fomewhat wide of my fubject ; I muft return to it. The defign of the ancients is distinguish ed by an union in the proportions, a Sim plicity of Contour, and excellence of cha racter. Of the firft I have faid as much as I might do, without venturing too far in to the mechanic of the art : But, as I have only hinted at the others, fome more par ticular remarks may not be improper. There is no one excellence of defign, frorn which we receive fuch immediate pleafure, as from a gracefulnefs of action : If we E 2 obferve 52 Of Design. Dial. IV. obferve the attitudes and movements of the Grepk Statues, we Shall mark that carelefs decency, and unaffected grace, which ever; attend, the motions and gestures of men un- confoious of obfervation. There \n~\ is a prodigious difference, between thofe move ments which fiow'from nature, and . thofe which are directed by art. The ancients knew this well; and hence followed that fingular Simplicity which cha- racterifes their works : For, though at times, as in the Venus of Medicis, and daughters of Niobe, they rife to an affumed gracefulnefs ; and even profefs a defire to pleafe ; yet this is confin'd to fo fimple a contour ; it is fo little above the meafure of ordinary action, that it appears lefs the effect of Study, than the natural refult of [»] Paulum interefle cenfes, ex animo omnia, Ut fert natura, facias, an de induftria ? Terent, And. aft. iv. fcene 5. 'i a fuperior Dial. IV. O/Desicn. 53 a fuperior character, or an habitual polite nefs. ^.Raphael has, in this particular, been wonderfully happy in his imitation of the antique. The moft courtly imagination cannot reprefent to itfelf an image of a more winning grace, than is to be feen in in his Sta. Cascilia : Indeed, an elegant Simplicity is the characteristic of his defign ; we no where meet in him the affected con trasts of Mic Angelp, or the Studied atti tudes of Guido ; the true difference be tween thofe, may be belt conceived, in a fnppofed comparifon of the real characters -of the Drama, with the actors whoperfon- ate them ; in Raphael, and the antique, we fee Alexander and Hamlet, in Mic. Angelo and Guido -And, A- Though in treating of grace and beauty, character, So far as it is determin- E 3 ed 54 Of D e s i g n\ Dial. IV. ed by them, has been naturally included ; yet there remains Still a more effential part ; '¦ I mean, that expreffion of a mind, con veyed in the air of the head, and intelli gence of the countenance. If, in the other branches of defign, the ancients are to be admired ; in this they are wonderfuj. However enlightened we may be by the moft elegant obfervance of nature, or warmed by the moft poetic defcriptions, the Belvedere Apollo, and daughter of Ni- obe ftill give us new ideas of noblenefs, energy, and beauty. The ftatuaries of i Greece, were not mere mechanicks ; men of education and literature, they were more the companions than fervants of their em ployers : Their tafte was refined by the converfation of courts, and enlarged by the lecture of their poets: Accordingly, the fpirit of their Studies breathes through their works. We fee no fuch influence in the productions of the moderns ; their greatest merit Dial. IV. Of D e s i g n. ^ merit is a fervile. imitation of the antique; the moment they lofe fight of them they are loft. In the elegant, they are little ; in the great, charged ; character they have none ; their beauty is the refult of mea- fure, not idea : And if, mistaking extra vagance for fpirit, they aim at the fublime, it ends in the blufterings of Bernini, or caricatures of Michael Angelo. B. From all that you have offered on the defign of the ancients, we may define grace to be the moft pleafing conceivable action, expreSfed with the utmoft fimpli- city each occafion will admit of. A. So far as a definition of Grace can go, yours gives a juft idea of it ; for, it implies the higheft degree of elegance in the choice ; of propriety in the application ; and of eafe in the execution : You rightly term it an action, for therff is no grace E 4 , without g6 Of D e s i g n. Dial. IV. without motion. Thus, Milton diftin- guifhes it ftom beauty, Grace was in all herjlepst heav'n in her eye. Venus was blit gueffed at by her beauty, She was known by her motions '¦ — Vera inceffu patiiit Dea: '• But, the per fection of Grace is, when it becorhes;[0] characterick ; and marks fome amiable emotion in the mind. Such, we may pre- furne, w&s the excellence of Aperies • [p] ; [o] Let us unite to thefe amiable exprefiions, a becomihg air of the head, flexure of the body, and an elegant difpofition of the limbs, we fhall then have a clear conception of that correggiefque Grace, which it has fo much puzzled our writers to explain. I have in my pflffeffion an excellent copy of the St. Jerome of Correggio, where one may fee in the Angel, the Ma donna," the Chrift, and the Magdalen, fo many dfflintt examples of this idea. Xp] Prsecipua Apellis in arte venuftas fait, cum eadem itate maxiiMi piQores effent ; quorum opera cum admiraretur, collaudatis omnibus, deefle iis unam who, Dial. IV. Of D e s i g n: 57 *' who, living at the fame time with fome " of the greateft painters ; after he had " feen and admired their Several works, " declared, that the only thing wanting in " them was Grace ; that they poffcffed " every other excellence ; but in this, he " faw no one equal to himl'elf." B. The testimonies which you produce from their writings ; but above all, the Greek ftatues, which we may look upon as living witneffes, Sufficiently prove the me rit of the ancients. Let us now, if you pleafe, confider that of the moderns : Thus, eftablifhing a general idea of comparifon between the two, we Shall have a more per fect one of both. I do not mean to lead you into a detail of the perfections or im perfections of our different artifts ;. it will illam Venerem dicebat, quam Graci Xa«V vocant ; cxtera omnia contigiffe, fed hac foli ftbi neminem pa- rem. Plin. lib. xxxv. c. 10. be 58 Of D e s i g n. Dial. IV. be fufficient to throw the merit of the caufe upon fome one, who is generally al lowed to be the moft excellent. A. There is no difficulty in our choice: I Shall lay before you the reflections I have made on the defign of Raphael ; with this latitude, that you may admit or reject them as they happen to fquare with your own ; for, this Should always be the cafe, where we profefs to have no other guide but feel ing ; and to form our judgment merely from effects. The defign of Raphael was, in its be ginnings, dry, but correct ; he enlarged it much on feeing the drawings of Michael Angelo : Of too juft an eye to give intire- ly into the exceffes of his model, he ftruck out a middle ftyle ; which, however, was not fo happily blended, nor to perfectly original, as quite to throw off the influence of Dial. IV. Of. D e s i g n. 59 of the two extremes : Hence, in the great, he is too apt to fwell into the. charged; in the delicate, to drop into the little . His defign, notwithstanding, is beautiful ; but never arrived to that perfection, which we difcover in the Greek ftatues. He is excellent in the characters of Philofophers, Apoftles, and the like; but the figures of his women have not that elegance, which is distinguished in the Venus of Medicis, or the daughter of Niobe; in thefe, his convex Contours have a certain heavinefs, which, when he feeks to avoid, he falls into a drynefs Still lefs pardonable. B. Yet his proportions are efteemed excellent ; and their fymmetry fuch, as to give to his figures an effect beyond the pro mife of their Stature. A. It &> Of D e s i g nt. Dial. IV. A. It is true, but yet, not having form ed his manner on the moft beautiful an tique, we do not fee in him that elegance in the proportions, that freedom in the joints, which lend all their motion to the Laocooh and Gladiator. Iriftead of thefe, the figures of Michael Angelo were his mo dels in the great ftyle ; whence, in his Con vex Contour, having quitted the lines of nature, and not having fubftituted thofe of ideal beauty, he became too like his ori- crinal ; as maybe feen in his Iricertdio di Borco. Would you therefore place Ra phael in his true point of view, you muft obferve him in the middle age ; in old men; or, in the nervous nature: In his Madonna's, he knew very well how to choofe, as likewife'how to vary the moft beautiful parts in nature : But, he kndw not, like the Greek ftatuaries, how to ex prefs a beauty fuperior to the natural. Thus, in Dial. IV. Of D e s i g n. 6t in his Galatea, at the palace Chigi, where he has [q~] profeffedly attempted ¦ a cha racter of perfect beauty, he has fallen Short of the beauty of his Madonna's : The caufe Of which feems to me to b'e this, that, in the former, he drew after his own ideas, which were imperfect; in the latter, he copied beautiful nature, which was almoft perfect. lam confirmed in this opinion by a fecond obfervation : Of all the objects of paint, Angels call moft for ideal beauty ; thofe of Raphael, are by no means distin guished in this particular ; for, he had no examples for them in nature, but was [q'] In a letter to the count Baldaffar Caftiglione, he fpeaks of his Galatea in the following words : " Delia " Galatea, mi terrei un gran maeftro, fe vi foflero la " meta delle tante cofe, che V. S. mi ferive : £ le '* dico, che per dipingere una bella, mi bifognaria " veder piu belle : Ma eflendo careftia di belle donne, " io mi fervo di certa idea, che mi viene alia mente. " Se quefta ha in fe alcuna eccellenza d'arte, io non '! fo : Ben mi affatico di avcrla." obliged 62 Of D t S I G N. DlAL.'IV. obliged to draw them from his own ima*- gination. B. Accordingly, he has given them a motion, fpirit, and expreffion, for which he could have no example. A. True ; but thefe do not constitute beauty, which is our prefent object : On the contrary, in Raphael they often coun teract it: Thus, in the heads of his Ma donna's, the nofe is generally too large ; he thought, no doubt, that this gave more meaning and fenfibility to the face. In the fame manner, his men, of the middle and advanced age, have their features too Strong ly marked ; the mufcles, particularly thofe of the lips and eye-brows, are charged : It is plain, that he preferred this form, be- caufe, by it, he could more eafily exprefs the feveral emotions of the mind. But, the perfection of an art, is, to unite the jufteSt Dial. IV. 0/ D e s i c n. 63 jufteft expreffions to the fineft forms. The Belvedere Apollo, and the daughter of Ni obe, are the ftandards of beauty ; what energy, what a divine expreffion is there in the one ? what diftrefs, what an affecting fenfibility in the other ? There are few ex preffions (if we except thofe, which excite in the;beholders either hatred or contempt) which may not be more happily marked in a fine countenance, than in fuch as are ill-favoured ; where the features are chare. ed, the Slightest movements throw them into forcible expreffions ; the confequences of which are, that the finer fymptoms of paffion are in a great meafure loft ; and the Stronger ones lofe much of their force, by the facility with which they are expref- . fed : But, in a face naturally beautiful and compofed, not only the degrees of paffion are traced with delicacy ; but, the violent agi tations of the foul, affect us more fenfibly, by the total difturbanccand alteration which they $4 Of D e s i g N. Dial. IV, they produce in the countenance. This idea will always have a great effect on the intelligent obferver ; and, in proportion as the execution is more difficult,, it wjll do more honour to the artift. I muft add to thefe remarks, that, exclufive of the. force which beauty gives to expreffions in- general, there are fome, which cannot well exift without it : Thus, if dignity, courage, love, or joy be thrown into a charged or ill-favoured countenance, they grow into an extremity, by which they lofe their very efience ¦, and are transformed into pride, fiercenefs, luft and grimace. You are not to fuppofe, that in the cafes above- mention- tioned, I always fpeak of either abfolute beauty, or abfolute deformity ; there are degrees in both ; and the judgment of the artift confifts, in proportioning thofe de grees to the feveral occafions. B. This, Dial. IV. Of D e s i g n* 65 B. This is, to turn a pleafing art into art ufeful fcience ; and to make every picture a fchool of virtue. But yet, I cannot for give you, the having reduced the defign of Raphael, fo much below the ftandard, at which it is generally placed; A. The judicious Pouffin has gone much farther than I have done, or even than he had a right to go ; when he affirmed, that Raphael among the moderns was an angel, but, that compared with the ancients, he was an afs. This is too much ; how ever, it ferves to Show how fenfibly this painter felt the difference that was between them. But, fetting aflde thefe comparifons, Our purpofe is to come at a fettled idea of the moft perfect defign : What is it to us, whether the examples were produced two thoufand, or two hundred years ago ? A man of tafte, like the philofopher, Should F be 66 Of D e s i o n. Dial. IV. be a citizen of the the world, acknowledge merit wherever he meets it, indifferent whe ther it Shines forth in a Raphael or Apellesy in a Michael Angelb or Glycon. B. You have advanced, that the greatest excellence of defign was grace ; whence is it then, that Correggio, who, in this is in imitable, is, by many, placed fo low in the clafs of Designers ? A. This arifes from a want of attention to the character and purfuits of this amiable painter. His conftant aim was grace : And a happy effect of clear obfcure : A wav ing and varied Contour was neceffary tO' this end : Hence, he gave wholly into the ferpentine, Studioufty avoiding right lines, and acute angles, as too fimple in their effects, [r] Thus the habit, and even ne- [>] Nullum fine venia placuit ingenium : Da mihi gueracumque vis magni nomkis virum, dicam illi quid ceffity Dial, IV. O/Disign. 67 cefty of continiaally varying his out line* threw him into little errors in drawing, whiGh Spring not, as fome think, from an ignorance of this branch of his art, but from a predilection for another ; and, there are "few, I believe, who would wifh thofe inadvertencies away, accompanied with the charms which gave occafion to them. B. It is a difpute among the critics, whether he ever faw or imitated the an tique; A. This difpute is his greatest praife; for, rf&ey who fuppofe he did, cannot otherwife account for the general beauty, atas fua ignoverit, quid in illo fciens diffimulaverit : Multos dabo, quibus vitia non nocuerint ; quofdam, quibus profuerint ; quos, ft quis eorrigit, delet : Sit enim vitia virtutibus immifta funt, ut illas fecum trac- tura fint. Sen. Ep. cxiv. F 2 and 6$ Of D e s i g n7 Dial. IV.: and elegance of his defign : While thofe, who are of a contrary opinion, ground ed on imperfect relations of his life, or the lapfes and unfteadinefs of his pencil, are forced to impute that beauty and elegance to a pure ftrength of genius. Certainly, his manner feems to have in it all the warmth of invention, as it has a certain boldnefs, fuperior to imita tion, and productive of uncommon graces. Upon the whole, I think, we may af firm of his defign, where it is not facri- ficed to his more favourite aims, that it is often mafterly, and always pleafing ; a quality, rarely met with in thofe fer- vile and unideal painters, who think they have attained every perfection, if they keep within the rules of drawing ; " [ s ] with thefe, leannefs paffes for [j] Macies illis pro fanitate, et judicii loco in'- firmitas eft ; et dum fatis putant vitio carere, in " health,, Dial. IV. Of D e s i g n. 69 " health, and weaknefs for judgment ; " and, while they think it fufficient " to be free from faults, they fall in- " to that capital fault, the want of «* beauties." id ipfum incidunt vitium, quod virtutibus ca- rent.' Quint, xi. 4. F 3 D I A- [7°r DIALOGUE W Of Colouring. iOHOULDthe moft able mailer in. O defign, attempt to reprefent, by that alone, a rofe or grape, we Should have but a faint and imperfect image ; let him add to each its proper colours, we no longer doubt ; we fmell the rofe, we touch the grape ; hence the poet [/] : So glow'd the grape, fo perfecl the deceit, My hand reached forward, ere I found the cheat. It feems then, that the firft gives a general idea ; the fecond a particular existence. It was this, no doubt, that induced Plutarch [/] MlXgS XulifX0' Toy (3o1gU» T3I{ JteislllXoif, 'TjregaTraliiGffs tji 8e« t«ii x%vpMlai. to Dial. V. Of Colouring. yi to affirm, " [a] that in painting, we are " more ftruck by colouring than drawing, " by reafon of its Similitude and decep- " tion :" And another obferves, " [x] That " the painter may defign the outlines and " proportions of a man, but it is by co- *' louring, that he brings it to reprefent a " Socrates or Plato." The ancients were not contented with attribudng to colours the power of realizing objects ; they make them to be their chief ornament, the very • foul of beauty : [y] Thus Tully, " There *' is in the body a certain harmony of pro- " portions, united to the charm of colour- " ing, and this is called beauty. An au- [»] Ef yguQut; xt^Muls^av tali J^g^f** yg«/si|KD?, o\* to ai/^iKtXov xut u%d\nKm. De Poetis aud. \x\ O Pojypatpos , ft n^flt- tuiu. Ammonius in x. Gateg. Ariftot. [j] Corporis eft quaedam apta figura membrorum, cum coloris quadam fuavitate, eaque dicitur pulchri- tudo. F 4 " thor, J2 0/ Colouring. Dial. V.-' " thor, of no lefs authority, obferves ; [z] " that fuch a body may be deemed truly " beautiful, in which a temperate and " pure blood fills the limbs, and fwelfs *' the mufcles, fpreading through the whole -" a ruddy tinge and glow of beauty." Hence it was, that a Grecian lady of ad mired tafte, being afked, which was the fineft colour in nature, anfwered, the blulh of an ingenuous and beautiful youth. B. You need not draw all your examples from antiquity : Whatever rank our paint ers may hold, we have Titians in our poets. — Obferve how Shakefpear pencils : "Tts beauty truly blent, whofe red and white Natures own fweet and cunning hand laid on. [z] In quo temperatus ac bonus fanguis implet membra, et exfurgit toris ; ipfos quoque nervos ru- bore tegit, ac decore commendat. De cauf. corrupt. eloq. c. 21. And Dial. V. 0/ Colouring. 73 And Fletcher, who excels in the defcription of beauty and its effects ; Have I not receiv'd A lady to my bed, that in her eye Keeps mounting fire, and on her tender cheeks Inevitable colour f Maid's Tragedy, Thus too our divine Milton : To whom the angel, with afmile that glowed Celeftial rofy red, Love's proper hue. Such as thefe may be truly called colours dipped in heaven ; and, a fine complexion, in the language of a poet, is the die of Love : Certainly it gives a wonderful effect to beauty ; it is a hint of foniething more than human ; it comes forth as the emana tion of an intrinfic purity and lovelinefs, aqd diffufes through the human form a tinge of the angelic nature. A. You 74 Of Colouring. Dial. V. A. You paint it like one who had felt its power. The influence, indeed, of this Species of beauty, which is the refult of co lours, feems to be univerfal ; and to extend to all beings capable of love. But (if we may credit the nice obfervers of nature) it is in none more remarkable than in birds [a~\ ; Thro' the bright flocks the cautious wooer flics, Dwells on each fpot, and notes their various dies : Foe to a fir anger love, he yields alone To kindred tints, and ieauties Hie his own. B. I Shall wifh hence forward to under stand the language of a goldfinch ; what a pleafure would it be, to hear the male warbling forth, [a] Agmina late Fasminea explorat cautus, matnlafque requirit Cognatas, paribufque interlita corpora guttis. Speft. N°. 412. Urit Dial. IV. O/Colourikg. y$ Urit me Glycera nitor, Et vultus nimium lubricus afpici. A. The open was palpable, and your raillery is perfectly fair. But, to return to our fubject ; whatever may be the influence of colours on other beings, we can have no doubt of it in ourfelves ; infomuch, that irregular, and even ordinary features, Shall often, by the mere luftre of red and white, overbear the power of the moft perfect fymmetry. We are not to wonder therefore, that the poets, hurrying over the other circum stances of beauty, dwell with fo much pleafure upon this. Thus the elegant Tibullus \h\, [£] Candor erat, qualem praefert Latonia Luna, Et color in niveo corpore purpureus. Ut Juveni primum virgo deduQa marito, Inficitur teneras ore rubente genas ; Such y6 O/Colouring. Dial. V. Such a mix' d whitenefs fpreads the doubtful moon, So thro' his fnowy fkin the fcarlet fhone; Thus, tinged in blujhes, moves the confcious maid Withjlepfufpended to the nuptial bed; Thus intermix' d with lilies breathes the rofe, And ripening apple with Vermillion glows. Statius on a fimilar occafion is more warm, and kindles almoft to extravagance [c] ; Stripped of his garments, with afudden bound Hejlarts to view, and dials a brightnefs round ; His polijh'd limbs, and glowing breajl difplay Beauties, that gladden like the fpring of day; Thro' his whole frame diffus'd, our eyes may trace The kindred blujh and fplendor of his face. Et cum contexunt amaranthis alba puella? Lilia, et autumno Candida mala rubent. Lib. iii. Eleg. 4. [c] Emicat, et torto chlamydem diffibulat auro. Effulfere artus, membrorumque omnis aperta eft Latitia, infignefque humeri, nee pedlora nudis Deteriora genis, latuitque in corpore vultus. Theb. lib. vi. If Dial. V. Of Colouring. 77 If the poets confidered colouring as the chief beauty in nature ; it is no wonder, that painters, whofe art is an imitation of nature, Should make it the great object of their ftudy. Accordingly, Parrhafius,Zeuxis, and Apelles, the moft celebrated painters, were at the fame time, the moft excellent colourilts. If we examine the praifes be ftowed on the laft of them, we Shall find, that they turn chiefly on that truth and beauty, which are the gift of colours: The mafter-piece of this painter, and confe quently of the art itfelf, was his Venus anadyomene. Tully thus marks its perfec tions, [ii] " In the Coan Venus, that is " not real body, but the refemblance of a " body : Nor is that ruddinefs, fo diffufed " and blended with white, real blood, but [d] In Venere Cda, corpus illud non eft, fed fimile corpori ; nee ille fufus et candore mixtus rubor, fan- guis eft, fed qusdam fanguinis fimilitudo. De Nat. Deor. lib. i. " a certain 78 Of Colouring. Dial. V. »'* a certain refemblance of blood." Ovid alludes to this fame tendernefs and warmth of pencil [d\. In graceful a£i her fea-wet locks eomprefs'd, Send the quick drops which trickle down her breafl, O'er her bright fkin the melting bubbles fpread, And clothe her beauties in a f after jhade. {/] Apelles a little before his death attempt ed a fecond Venus, which was to have ex- [/} Sic madidos ficcat digitis Venus uda capillos, Et modo maternis tefta videtur aquis. Lib xi. Triftv To the fame purpofe the epigrammatift Aufonius, Ut complexa manu madidos falis aequore crines, Humidulis fpumas ftringit utraque comis. [e] Apelles Veneris caput, et fumma pectoris politif- fima arte perfecit : Reliquam pratem corporis inchoa tam reliquit. Lib. i. Ep. 9. Nemo picTsor eft inventus, qui Veneris earn partem, quam Apelles inchoatam reliquiflet, abfolveret ; oris enim pulchritude, reliqui corporis imitandi fpem au- ferebat. De OfEciis> lib. iii. ceeded DrAL.V. 0/ Colouring, 79 ceeded the firft ; but died, juft as he had finished the head and breafts. We are told, that no painter could be prevailed on to complete this figure ; the idea, the cha racter, the Style of defign were determined ; it Should feem then, that what they dread ed, was, a comparifon of their tints with his. It is certain, the reputation of this painter was not owing to great compofi- tions ; many of his moft celebrated works were [/] fingle figures, and, fome of them, painted from the life -, a practice, which naturally produces, as is proved in Titian, an excellency in colouring ; as this is only to be learnt, by an accurate and diligent obfervance of the mixed and fubtile tints in nature. Accordingly, Pliny tells [_/"] Fecit Apelles Amtigonum thoracatum, cum equo incedentem : Pentiores artis preferum omnibus ejus operibus eundem regem fedentem equo. Alercan- drum et Philippum quotjes pinitcrit, enumerare fuper- vacuum eft. Plin. xxxv. 10. us, 8o Of Co lou ring. Dial. V, us, that he [g] " painted a hero naked, in " which he1 challenged nature herfelf.' Butj above all, Propertius pays him the prettieft compliment, and, at the fame time, gives us the jufteft notion of his merit, when, diffuading his miftrefs from the ufe of paint, he recommends to her to truft, to her real complexion ; which he com pares to the [i>] native carnation of Apel les. — - — [g] Pi'nxit et heroa nudum ; eaque piflura naturarn ipfam provQcavit,, Lib. xxxv. 10. \V\ The- common objection to the colouring of Apelles^ is, that he ufed but four colours : For this we have the authority of Pliny, who, at the fame time', -names' the colours, viz. black, white, red and yellow. Now, as it does not feem poffible to form a perfedl carnation from thefe, we muft either fuppofe that'Pliny was miftaken, or, that the praifes beftowed on the colouring of Apelles, by all the beft judges of antiquity, and by Pliny himfelf among the reft, were not juft. There- is a paffage in Cicero, which, I think, clears this difficulty, and proves ' that Pliny was mi£ raken ; it is as follows : Similis in pittura ratio eft, in £)ualis' Dial. V. Of C o t o v r i n q. 2\ Quails Jpelleis ejl color in tabulis. Thus making it a merit in nature, to rife to a competition with art. By attempting to prove that colouring was the great ex cellence of Apelles, it muft not be inferred frpm hence, that he was wanting in the other parts : The age in which he lived, was distinguished above all thofe before and after, by a perfection jn defign ; a weakneft therefore in this, would not have paSTed uncenfured in fo capital a painter. The refemblance, likewife, in the praifes be ftowed on him, with thofe, which, in later times have been attributed to Correggio, qua Zeuxim, et Polygnotutn, et Timentem, et eorunv qui non fust ufi plus qnatuor coloribus,/cr»Kw et linea- menta laudamus. At in Aetione, Nicomacho, Protp- gene et Apejle, jjMts perfefla funt omnia. Thus, thofe who ufed but four colours, are praifed for their pre portions and char ail ers only; but, Apelles is diftin- guiftied from them, and declared to be perfect in every branch of his art. The inference is obvious. G the 8?' 6/ Colouring;. Dial. VV the great mafter'in the clear obfcure, gives • ¦ ; - • ¦ ' . ¦ juft reafon to fuppofe, that he was in this particular, equal, if not fuperior to any of his time. I would recommend this to the obfervation of thofe, who, on a compa rifon of modern with ancient painting, are fo ready to fuppofe the advantage on the fide of the forfner ; as I do likewife all that I have offered on the character of Apelles, to thofe fanguine admirers of the Roman School, who confider colouring as a kind • of fupeffiuity in paint. Having thus far Shewn the merit of colouring, fo far as it is productive of truth and beauty ; you may expect I Should fay foniething of a branch much cultivated and admired by the moderns ; I mean that harmony and tone, which fpring from a happy difpofi- tiOn of variegated draperies : A perfect knowledge of the union and opposition of colours, together with the effects of their different Shades and reflections, requires, no Dial.V. 0/ Colouring. 83 ho doubt, great Study and practice ; but I apprehend, that too great an attention to this flattery of the eye, has often made our moderns neglectful of. the more effential parts. That this was the cafe in the inferior aera of ancient painting, we have the autho rity of Diohyfius Halicarnaffeus : " [/] The " paintings of the ancients, (fays-he) were " fimple and unvaried in their colouring; " but correct in their drawing ; and diftin- " guifhed by their elegance : Thofe which " fucceeded, lefs correct: in drawing, were " more finifhed, more varied in their lights " and Shades ; trufting their effects to the " multitude of their colours." You will obferve, that this boafted fcience of the moderns, was, to the ancients, a fymptom [z] Ap^aioo ypu tvypv cypuaut. Dion. Hal. in Ifaeo, p. 167. ed. Oxon. G 2 of ::.;. 84 Of Co l o v .*¦ l N e- ^^h ^' pf the decay of paint : And indeed, can die, happieft effect in this kind, that ever flaw* «d from the pencil of Titiai?, make ys, amends for his frequent errors in drawing* or poverty of character ? Can $ie, beft piloted drapery of a Carrache* or Guido* balance the want of grace and beauty in ths one, of warmth and expreffion in the other? Apelles feeing a Helen, that had been paint ed by one of his fcholars, loaded with, orna ments: Cried out, [£] " So young man I not ** able to paint her beautiful, thou haft **• made her fine." When I reflect on the authority of the writers, and the agreement of their notions on the fubject of colouring : I am inclined to believe, that the ancients were equal, if not Superior to the moderns in the moft effential parts : I Should lay little ftrefs on general praifes, or the extra- [ij Q futetzxtov, fui) ivyafittos ypa^at xarfw, «rtoW»tw trtxottixat. 4 vagance Dial. V. 0/ Coi,ourino. ^5 vagance of admiration ; becaufe, it is natii^ ral to us to praife the beft we know ; But, when I meet with distinctions, which mark the degrees of perfection, and with effects, which can proceed but from the Higheft, I Can no longer doubt. I Shall offer you an inftance in each kind, which Strike me as decisive. Parrhafius and Euphranor had each painted a Thefeus ; " £/} Euphra- " nor objected to his rival, that his Thefeus " looked as if he had fed on rofes, his own «' as if he had fed on fleSh." What more could we fay of Titian and Barocci ? Yet, this flight and flcSrid ftyle, was not the con ftant manner of Parrhafius ; Pliny tells us, that he painted two warriors, one of which rulhing to the battle feemed to fweat ; the other, ftripped of his armour was feen to [l] iv/p^aiu^ Ton Qijjia Toy tavlov, ra tlu^petamv craaE- QuXi' hiyut, to» fee* ixtKov §o5a fiiGgaxivat, lot h tuvlw »pt» 0aitu. Plutarch. Bellone an pace clariores faerint Athenienfes. G 3 pant. 86 Of C o l o u r i n g. Dial. V, pant. What a warmth, what a. tendernefs of pencil ? Can paint exprefs that melting diffusion, that deWy moifture, which Spring's from a quickening perforation ? The mel- loweft tints of the Venetian fchool furnifh no fuch ideas. Our notions of excellence are too much limited by our experience ; had we never feen better colouring than that of the Galatea of Raphael, a defcription of the Venus of Titian would pafs for extra vagant. Why might not the Greek fchool have been as far fuperior to the Venetian, as this is to the Roman ? We will now pur- fue the fame method we propofed before, and confider the colouring of the moderns in their greateft mafter Titian, B. Thouch I confefs this was the rule propofed, yet, I muft take the liberty to break in upon it, and to beg, that you would firft give your opinion of the colour ing of Raphael. The Dial. V. Of Col o u r i n g. 87 The advances of fuch a painter in every branch of his art, are worthy our obferva- tiorj ; particularly too, as I find the critics much divided on this point, fome holding him to be an excellent, others an indifferent colourift. A. Raphael, at his fetting out, had no other guide than his own genius ; as, the painters his predeceffors, could furnifh him with no examples to imitate. After fome time, he learnt from Fra. Bartholomeo a bet ter ftyle ; his touch became more vigor ous, his colouring grew warmer, and he finifhed lefs; yet, he ftill preferved too great a famenefs ; and all his perfonages had the fame brown and dufky complexion. He perfifted a long" time in this tafte ; and, one may venture to affirm, that he never wholly abandoned it. In his picture of the difpute of the Sacrament, which is the beft G 4 coloured 85 Of Co io tr r_ t tf c Dial* v. coloured of *ll his works in frefco, one dif- covers a difference between the carnation of his angds and men ;— fuch a circumstance would not be remarked in our beft colaur- jfts ; who preferve this distinction, not only in different beings, but likewjfe in the dif ferent fexes and ages, In the St. Jerome of Correggio, the complexion of the feint, the angel, the child, the mother, and the Magdalen, are all varied, agreeable to their different ages, natures,, and characters. ; In his fehool of Athens* Raphael was more bold, and lefs finished ; and, changing Still his manner in the Heliodorus,. he painted in a Style more free and varied ; though yet, in the delicate, he was Short of perfection. At length, his paffion for defign, made him negligent of colourings as we fee in the Incendio di Borgo. About this time, he be gan to paint with lefs diligence ; and hav ing established his character, left much to his fcholars ; till at length, finding his re putation Dial. V. Of C o £ ckj-r i k g.- % putatfon diminished, "he determined tote* eftabliSh it, by exerting his whoferfkill and knowledge in his transfiguration. : The co louring of this is efteemed gbod, yet,trOrri that qualify or fameriefs," which. I noticed before, his flefh is (till hard and dry. His demitints were compOfed merely of lights and Shades, whence, they retained always a greyifh and duSky caft ; and, whereas, a fine and delicate Skin, -has a greater variety of tints, "than the grofs ; Raphael, hot pof- feltingthis variety, his carnations are ge nerally coarfe and denfe. We muft obferve .'in this place, that the paintings of Raphael in frefco, are better coloured than thofe in oil : As the firft was his favourite practice, he left the fecond moftly to his Scholars, particularly to Julio Romano ; contenting himfelf with retouching and finishing: For this reafon, we cannot fo well judge of his paintings in oil : In which, fuch as we fee them, he is much inferior, with refpect to ¦ 'ttXi ' colouring, go 0/ Colouring. Dial. V. colouring, to Correggio and Titian ; but, in frefco, he is fuperior to all.— — < B. Your obfervations on the failings of Raphael, will be as Shades to the merit and beauty of Titian.— r— A. Portrait painting has all along been the favourite practice of the Venetian fchool. This conftant imitation of nature, has led them into the knowledge of thofe various tints, by which She at once distinguishes, and expreSTes the different carnations. To defcribe, what colours, or mixtures of them, produce thofe various appearances, is the mechanic part of the art ; our fubject is the ideal. We may compare, or determine the degrees of merit in the beft painters, with out following minutely their mechanic pro- cefs ; I can affirm, for inftance, without danger of being contradicted, that Correg gio has not the tendernefs or delicacy of Titian : Dial. V. 0/ Co louring. 91 Titian:, His flefh is too firm ; the Skin too much Stretched ; the humid of our compo- fition is not fufficiently marked. An artift might tell us, that thefe defects proceed from a colouring too yellow or red ; from demitints too much verging on the green ; whereas, nature, and the paintings of Titian, prove, that, in clear and transparent Skins, the humid ever produces a bluifh caft. But, to leave this matter to thofe whofe province it. is. I Shall content myfelf, in this place, with obferving, that in colour ing, [02] Titian, of all the moderns, comes the neareft to nature, and of courfe to per fection. To enlarge more particularly on his merit, would be but a repetition of the [«] Might I prefume to cenfure the colouring of Titian in any particular, it would be in this, that his male and female tints (if I may fo call them), are not fufficiently diftinguifhed : They are both extremely tender and animated, but, the colouring in his women is too vigorous and mafculine. remarks, gz Of Colouring. Dial. V. remarks which I have already offered on the colouring of the ancients : Let us apply thofe remarks to his works, they will reci procally illuftrate each other. B. I Aid fenfible, from the nature of the* fubject, as like wife from what y6u have al ready touched' on, that" a more minute exa mination of this matter would embarrafs us in the mechanic. You have fatisfied me, how far colouring is an aid to beauty, and neceffary to truth : You have Shewn, hovfr highly it was efteeriied by the critics, how induftrioufly cultivated by the artifts of an tiquity. Sy^ marking the failings of Ra phael, and proportioning the merit Of Cor- regio, you have led me into a feeling of the mellow and tender tints of Titian* It would be unreafonable to exact more from you Ort this point ; but there is another, on which I muft beg you to be more explicit ; I mean the general tone or harmony of colours; hi which, Dial. V. Of Co l o u rin g. 93 which, you juft now fuppofed the moderns to bg much fuperior to the ancients. A. My fuppofition was grounded on the Qbfcurity of their writers, and the difference qf th,eir practice. The ancients verfed irj the, mid, derived from this, as I have hefore pjbferved, their elegance and correcftnefs jrj defign. . They were no lefs indebted to it, for. their truth and beauty of colouring. The moderns, on the other hand, particu larly the Venetians, accuftamed to clothe their figures, in velvet, filks, woollen, linen and the like, were naturally led into an ob- feryanee of the different [a] effects of theic [»] We may form a general idea of the variotil cffefts of reflections from the following examples : If a blue be reflected on a yellow, the latter becomes greenifh ; if on a red, the red becomes purple ; and fo on through a variety of combinations : And as the vitim is of a nature to ve&m all $e cftJoirrSj and to be tinged with that of each reflection, the painter muft be careful bow his carnations may be affefted by the feveral reflection*. reflections ; 94 Of C o l o u R i n g. Dial. V.' reflections ; as, of the accord or difagree ment in their appofition. In order to be convinced, that this accord or difagreement is not fantaftical, we need but obferve the rainbow in its full difplay of colours; at which time, their union is perfect : Let the red, the blue, or yellow difappear, it is en tirely disturbed. In the fame manner, place green and yellow, or yellow and red toge ther in a picture, they are evidently at va riance ; let the blue interpofe, their corre- fpondence is reftored. Rubens has painted in imitation of the rainbow ; all the colours co-operate ; the effect is good but accident al ; but, in Titian and Correggio, this ar rangement is the refult of fcience, it is a harmony, which fprings from a judicious and happy union of confenting colours. B. It Should feem that the Mexicans were great matters of this harmony or cor- refpondence of colours, of which, Antonio , de Dial. V. Of Colouring. g^ ' de Solis, the elegant authpr of the Cpnqueft of Mexico, gives the following remarkable inftance. " Among the prefents fent to " Cortez from the emperor, was a quanti- " ty of plumes and other curiofities, made " of feathers ; whofe beauty and natural *' variety of colours found on rare birds " that country produces, they fo placed and te mixed with wonderful art, distributing: " the feveral colours, and Shadowing the " light with the dark fo exactly, that, with- " out making ufe of artificial colours, or " of the pencil, they could draw pictures, *' and would undertake to imitate nature. " In another place, Montezuma is de- " fcribed feated on a chair of burnished " gold, which glittered through the vari- " ous works of feathers, placed in hand- " fome proportion about, the nice diftri- " bution of which, in fome meafure, feem- " ed to outvie the coft of the metal." A. The g6 0/ CotooaiKG. Dial, V. A. The example you have produced in the practice of the Mexicans, is an extra ordinary inftance of the happy effect from an union of colours ; and it is probable that their artifts were, in this particular, nothing inferior to the Italians* Their Skill, in wav ing t}iofe various colours into a kind^pf fea thered tapeftry, or Mofaick, and forming in them regular pictures, and lively imita tions of nature, far exceeds the defcriptions we meet with, of the Babylonian tiffues : As, in their painted language, they evi dently refemble, and feem to have excelled the hieroglyphicks of the Egyptians. B. When we meet with fuch ftrokes of refemblance in the efforts of human wit, among nations cut off from all intercourfe with each other, we are moved with a kind of pleafing furprife; fome treat them as the inventions of hiftorians j others account for DlAtil" V. Of Co L O U R I n c. 97 fpr them by fuppofed, though undifcover- ed, communications ; and yet, to confider things juftly, nothing can be more natural ; the feeds of ingenuity, like thofe of good fenfe, are fown in all foils; and it is no more extraordinary, that their productions Should be alike, than, that the oranges of New-Spain Should refemble thofe of Old. H DIA- l98 ] DIALOGUE VI. Of the Clear obscure. A, [«] T am perfuaded, that, notwithftand- X ing all the pains you have taken, to form a juft idea of the Clear obfcure, from the writings of Vafari, Felibian, and the reft, you will agree with me, that you have more Satisfaction in this matter, from a fingle glance at a picture of Correggio, than from all you have ever read on that fubject. Whether this proceeds from a want of knowledge in thofe writers, or our ignor ance of the mechanic of the art, which they are fo apt to confound with the ideal, [b] Tandem fefe ars ipfa diftinxit, et invenit lumen atque umbras, differentia colorum alterna vice fefe exckante. Pirn. lib. xxxv. c. 5. I Shall Dial. VI. Of the Clear obscure, gJ I Shall not take upon me to determine : But, Certain it is, had we not before our eyes the examples to which they refer us, we Should be often at a lofs for their meaning. Now, in treating of the Clear obfcure of the ancients* we have neither the works [p] nor writings of their painters to guide us. Happily, their claflic authors, men of parts and erudition, were univerfally admirers of this art. Hence their frequent allufions to it ; their meta phors borrowed from it ; with the defcrip tions of particular paintings, and their ef- fectSi In thefe laft we cannot be deceived ; like effects,, in picture, as in nature, muft proceed from uniform caufes : And when [/] I do not mention in this jjlace the paintings found at Herculaneum, becaufe I cannot look on then! as of -a clafs to reft on them the merits of the ancient artifts. There are beauties, it is true, fcattered through out them ; bur, they are the beauties rmrientis artis, of an art in its decline ; fdch as Pliny defcribes it to have been in lifetime j when, as he feelingly lamentfs, there was nulla nobilit piSuta. Ha we ioo Of the Clear obscure. Dial. Vf. we find thefe to correfpond exactly with our own obfervations on the works of the mo derns, this analogy leads us into a certainty, as to the fimilitude of the means by which they, were produced. B. Such inferences as thefe, when they are natural and unforced, are more condu- five than pofitive affertions ; for we are more apt to be, deceived by authority, than by the reafon of thingsi A. \jf\ " Longinus obfervesj that, if we " place in parallel lines, on the fame plane, " a bright and an obfcure colour, the for- 'i " mer fprings forward, and appears much- " nearer to the eye." Hence we may re mark, that when painters would give a pro- [q] Ewi tou avlov xitftam nwrt&oo •Btaqu.XKrfrw i» xg&~ pua i t»is cxtui ti xat tpwlof, oftu; mr^uviratia it to (put, vutf 0-^.tai, xat ov fiotov cifl%oi, uKKu xat tyyvliqu Mark'd by the form and fplendor of a god; j The rays maternal round his temples play, And gild his beauties milk a brighter day; Thefe the fond mother Jiudious to improve, Breath' d on his per fan all the powers of love; Thro' his long winding locks the magic flows, Beams from his eyes, and in each feature glows. There is fomething in this defcription fo truly picturefque, it breaks upon the ima gination with fuch a hidden energy of Clear obfcure, that I am perfuaded, the poet muft have had in his eye, fome celebrated picture in this ftyle. It is eafy to distinguish, when the arts borrow their ideas one from ano ther, and the lights which they fo commu- Os, humerofqueDeofimilis: Namque ipfadecorarn Casfariern nato Genetrix, lumenque Juventae Purpureum, et lsetos oculis amarat honores. Mneid. i. ver. 590. nicate 108 Of the Clear obscure. Dial. VI. nicate and receive, reverberate, and prove reciprocally their beauties. B. I could never read the paffage you have juft quoted, without being ftruck with the beauty of this image; but you have fupplied me with an adventitious pleafure : The correspondence of thefe filter arts, acts, in fome degree, like the harmony of con- fenting voices ; the idea, which they ex prefs, is the fame, but the effect is doubled in theif agreement. When warmed by the defcription of Virgil's Laocoon, we gaze on that at the Vatican, his cries are more piercing, his pains more exquifite, and the ideas of the poet are as unifons to thofe of the Statuary. A. Thus far I have touched on the two leading objects of the Clear obfcure ; firft, That roundnefs or projection, by which figures are difengaged from their fond, and Spring, Dial. VI. Of the Clear obscure, ick? fpring, as it were, from canvafs into life.— Secondly, The distinctive or picturefque diftribution of light to the feveral characters introduced on the fcene. I say, I have only touched on thefe fub- jects, it being my defign, rather to trace the outlines, than to give the full image of painting. To be equal to this laft, I muft have, not only an informed judgment, but a creative hand ; for, without a knowledge and practice in the mechanic, there is no venturing into the depths of this art. How ever, I flatter myfelf, that this Sketch, rude as it is, will carry with it more of the true features of the original, than any you could collect from the writings of our painters, or the authority of our Cicerones ; and though it Should not give us a perfect knowledge, •it will give us a pleafing and, claffieal view of our fubject. The third care of the paint er, in the Clear obfcure, if not So obvious, i is no Of the Clear obscure* Dial. VI, is no way lefs effential than the former. When feveral objects prefent tbemfelves in one view to the eye, we may obfervej that they all differ in the force of their appear ance, each receiving and reflecting the rays of light variously* according to its peculiar form, texture, or pofition : This variety in nature, exerted in its imitation, gives to painting a wonderful air of truth ; the eye meeting the fame effects in the copy, which it has been ufed to in the original, lofes fight of art, and receives the new creation as from the hand of nature. To this, no doubt, Philoftratus alludes, when having propofed fj>] hills, woods, and rivers, as the objects [h] AZ.o-ri, xat oen, xat arvyut, xat to» «t9fg<* ty u raula. ^1r exod. Icon. p. 763. Ed. Lip. That the ancients excelled in Landfcape painting, we have the teftimorry of Pliny j Ludius, Divi Augufti, setate primus inftituit amceniffimam parietem pKluram, villas, et porticus, ac topiarca opera lacos, nemoray colles, pifcinas, euripos, amnes, litora qualia quis op- taret : Varias ibi obambulantium fpecies, aut navi- gantium. Lib. xxxv. 10. of Dial. VI. Of the Clear obscure, m of paint, he adds, and the air in which they are : Now, there is no reprefenting the air otherwife than by its effects •, the which, can be fenfible only, in the relative appear ances of fuch objects, as are contained in it. But, of all thefe circumstances of diverfity, the difference arifing from their refpective distances, is the moft obvious and exten-i five; this is to be distinguished two ways, t>y the diminution of forms ; and the de greeing of colours. Thefe vary, accord ing to the denfity, or depth of the medium, through which they are feen. The firft, being the meafurement of proportions, is regulated by the laws of perfpective : But, the fecond, though it muft co-operate with And Pliny the younger, defcribing one of his Villas, in a letter to a friend, endeavours to give him the higheft idea of it, by comparing it with a well paint ed landfcape. Lib. v Ep. 6. Let thofe, who affirm fo confidently, that the ancients were unacquainted with the Clear obfcure and per- fpedtive, explain, how thefe things are to be reprefent- ed without them. i the Ji& Of the Clear obscure. Dial. VL the former, can be governed only by the eye, and comes within the province of the Clear obfcure; which, by fetting its objects in full or diminished lights* can mark mi nutely their withdrawing from the eye, and determine their feveral distances, by the re lative force of their appearances. What knowledge the ancients had of thefe laws, and what ufe they made of them, may be collected from many paffages in their writ ings ; it will be fufficient to quote an exam ple of each ; touching the meafurement of forms. " [c]How pleafing, fays Philoftratusj " is the artifice of the painter ; for, hav- " ing manned the walls with armed fol- " diers, he prefents fome intire, fome half " figures ; of fome we fee the breafts, now \c J Hsb to ac^icrfj.a. Ton £wy£u(pov' «^£gl?a^^«ll yag Toi^ raXftrti atSeu; un\to-[ievovc, rovf ft.cn agliou? isaeixct opur, ¦tov; Sc r;[Aio-ca oi|/m. ui* cXtuStts, c!]a vSuqoi, it\a inonr,aut. K-ulaGattoviTu ya§ e<; to vsuo n kJ/is apJaKviitlut Siulz&ov/ Tu a uv\tj. Phil. Icon. lib. 1. c. Pifcatores, p. 784.. I courfe, 114 Of the Clear obscure, Dial. VJ. courfe, the degreeing and distancing of ob jects, is the province of the Clear obfcure. : It Should feem, that the modern fculptors ' have not thought fo, when, without any fuch aids, they have attempted in their baf- fo Relievo's to produce the fame effects. A. Their ill fuccefs justifies my obfer vation ; their firft line of figures, only, has a plain to reft on ; the others are fufpended, and, contrary to the laws of nature, as they retire from the eye, and diminish in propor tion, they rife in height ; infomuch, that the feet of the hindmoft are often on a par allel with the knees of the foremoft. The ancients were too wife to give into fuch an abfurdity ; their purfuit, in all their works, was a good effect ; and nothing could have a worfe than this. We therefore find, that in fculpture, they attempted not to mark their distances, otherwife, than by a Simple diminution of the Relievo; but, left to painting, Dial. VI. Of the Clear obscure. 115 painting, what fculpture could not affume, the deception of the Clear Obfcure.— B. Yet, from this, which was an inftance of their good fenfe, has been drawn an ar gument of their ignorance ; and, becaufe they did not force the laws of the Clear ob fcure into fculpture, to which they are aliens ; it has been inferred, that they knew not their connection with painting, out of which they naturally grow.— . A. I have, I think, both from reafon and authority, proved the weaknefs of this fuppofition ; but, Should you ftill have the leaft doubt, the teftimony of Virtruvius muft intirely remove it. By this, it will appear, that the Greek painters, not only knew the rules and ftudied the effects of perfpective ; but that their greateft philo- fophers, ahd mathematicians, thought it worthy their attention, to reduce thefe ef- I 2 fects Hf5 Of the Clear obscure. Dial.VI. fects to fure and determined laws. " {VJAga- " tharcuS was the firft who painted a fcene, " at the time when JEfchylus exhibited his " tragedies at Athens : He has left a com- " mentary on this fubject. From this hint, " Democritus and Anaxagoras wrote on " perfpective ; explaining, in what manner " we Should, agreeable to the appearances " in nature, from a central point, make the " lines to correfpond with the eye, and the " direction of the vifual rays : So that, from " a feeming confufion, may refult a natural «( effect; and the fcene become a true re- " prefentation of buildings : And, that [e] Agatharcus primum, Athenis ^Efchylo docente tragoediam, fcenam fecit ; et de ea re commentarium reliquit : Ex eo moniti Democritus et Anaxagoras, de eadem re fcripferunt, quemadmodum oporteat ad aci- em oculorum, radiorumque extenfionem, certo loco teutro conftituto, ad lineas naturali ratione refpon- dere ; uti de incerta re, certs imagines asdificiorum in fcenarutn pifturis redderent fpeciem ; et quae in di rects planifque frontibus fint figuratas, alia abfcedentia, alia prominentia effe videantur. In Prasf. lib. vii. " thofe Dial. VI. Of the Clear obscure. 117, " thofe objects which are drawn on a per- " pendicular plain, may appear, fome re- «' tiring from the eye, others advancing to- *' wards it." You will obferve on this paf- fage, that the painter was before-hand with the philofopher ; and by imitating the va rious effects of vifion, had worked himfelf into the myftery of its laws. So that in this, as in many other cafes, practice, in- ftead of being the child, was the parent of fcience. B. You have fully vindicated the fcience of the ancients in the particular before us, and diSSipated that cloud, with which the vanity of the moderns had obfcured it ; I am afraid, the more we examine any pre tended advantage over them, the lefs reafon we Shall find to triumph.— A, Having thus given a Sketch of the three principal objects of the Clear obfcure; 1 3 i£ 118 Of the. Clear obscure. Dial. VI. it will be fufficient to mention the fourth, as it feems tofpring of itfelf from a juft exer tion of the former ; I mean the union of the Clear obfcure. This is, when the par ticular accidents of lights and Shades fo co operate, as to produce, in the general, a fine effect ; and that the picture fends forth fuch a proportion of light, as is molt pleafing to the eye, and advantageous to its feveral ob jects. Of this, if I underftand him right, Pliny fpeaks in the following paffage. " [/] Now fplendor was added, this is a " different thing from light ; bur, being " the refult of light and Shade, it was there- " fore called the tone." And Plutarch, Speaking of the painting of Dianyfius [#}, ufes force and the tone as Synonymous ; and [y] Adjeftus eft fplendor, alius hie quam lumen : quem, quia inter hoc et umbram eflet, appellaverunt Tonqn. Lib. xxxv. 5. [g] T* AiowO'iot) £wygx$iti[Aula, i(7^o» c%oilu xat To»oy. Plutarch in Timoleonte. with Dial. VI. Of the Clear 03sgure. 119 with reafon, as it is this accord or harmony of the Clear obfcure, that gives to painting its firft and Striking effect. ' This it is that enchants us, in the Nativity, and other pieces of Correggio ; and to reprefent its power in the Strongest light, I need but obferve, that where this is, we are charmed by a Ca- ravaggio ; where it is wanting, we look cold ly on a Raphael. B. I have often thought, when I have had before me a painting of the Roman fchool, that it was like looking at a profpect in a gloomy day : The beauties of nature are there ; but they want that, which Should illumine and embellish them. The union of the Clear obfcure, fuch as you have de scribed it, is the fun of picture. A. You have expreffed it juftly; for it is not only pleafing in its general effect, but gives vigour and warmth to each particular I 4 object; 120 Of the Clear obscure. Dial. VI. object ; and beftows on them, like the breath of Venus, the latos honores, thofe gladfome beauties, which raife them above the condi tion of an ordinary appearance. B. When I confidered how little fatis- faction I had received on this fubject, from the writings of the moderns, I did not ima gine that you could ever clear this obfcuri- ty, by lights borrowed from thofe of the ancients; efpecially, as I have been accuf- tomed to believe, [h] that their painters were but fuperficially, if at all, verfed in this branch of their art. You have explain ed fo fully the different powers and merits [h] Some have alTerted roundly, that the ancients were unacquainted with the Clear obfcure; others (who confider, that a certain degree of it is infeparable from the very nature of painting) fuppofe, that, what they knew of it, was nothing more than the mere ef- feft of imitation.; without principles or fcience. Had this been the cafe, is it to be imagined, that fo judir cious a critic as Cicero, would have fpoken of the Of Dial. VI. Of the Clear oescure. 121 of the Clear obfcure, that I think, in order to have a reafonable degree of knowledge in this matter, we need do no more, than apply thofe obfervations to the paintings of the Venetian and Lombard Schools. But yet, as in treating of this fubject, you have mentioned Raphael and Correggio-, and feemed to fet them in contraft one to the other ; it would be a further fatisfaction, Should you mark more particularly, in what that difference confifts. A. It Should feem, that in the Clear ob fcure, Raphael knew no part but the imi tative ; we find the cait of his lights and Shades, to be no other, than the cafual ef- lights and fhades of eloquence ; or propofed the con duct of painters in the Clear obfcure, as worthy the imitation of orators ? The paffage is as follows, and merits a particular attention : Sed ha beat tamen ilia in dicendo admiratio, ac fumma laus umbram aliquam, et recefTum, quo magis id, quod erit illuminatum, ex- ftare, atque eminere videatur. De Oratore, lib. iii. feet 122 Of the Clear obscure. Dial. VI. feet of the difpofition of his figures. Cor reggio, on the other hand, is intirely ideal ; and confiders the difpofition of his figures, merely as it tends to produce a better effect of Clear obfcure. It is no wonder there fore, that fcience Should be fuperior to ac cident. Raphael's fyftem, in the compofuion of his hiftory, was fimple and uniform ; it con- Sifted wholly in placing his ftrongeft lights foremoft, and giving them a gradual dimi nution into the fond.— Hence, moft fre quently, his figures in the firft plain are dreffed in white ; a practice, which he learn ed from the Florentine fchool : But Cor reggio, and the Lombard fchool, put for ward the pure and unmixed colours; fuch as red, yellow, and blue ; obferving that the white has an effect [/] too tranfparent [«'] For this reafon Titian brought forward his ob- fcures, and threw his clears into the back ground. This may appear to counteract the principle I at firft i and Dial. VI. Of the Clear obscure. 123 and weak. This method of Raphael, fuch as I have defcribed it, anfwers fully in giv ing a roundnefs to his foremoft figures •, but i; is weak in its general effect : He knew not the powers of the different colours, ftill lefs, the beauties which they communi cate and receive from each other. Correg gio was a mafter of both ; he not only knew their, juft balance and reciprocal in fluence, but extends this knowledge even to their Shades. Thus, you may diftinguifl* in a painting of his, the Shade of a rofe co loured drapery, from that of a red ; as you may, the Shade of a clear white, from that of one more obfcure, It is eafy to conceive, what advantages, an uncommon genius, and elegant imagination, muft draw from fuch refources as thefe ; hence fprings that laid down ; butj as the clears and obfcures fly from each other, they mutually ferve, according as they are placed, to throw each other forward, or at a diftanpe. warmth, 124 Of the Clear obscure. Dial. Vf. warmth, that variety, that magic, which enchants the eye, and prepoffeffes the un derstanding : For, certainly we do not judge of Correggio as of other painters ; preju diced by the- charms of his Clear obfcure, grimace fometimes paffes for beauty, affec tation for grace ; it is by this that he always gains his end, which is to pleafe ; and we view his works with a predilection^which doubles his beauties, and blinds us to his errors.—. B. From this reprefentation of the merit of Correggio, are we not to look upon it rather as fantaftical than real ? Does it not operate more, by feducing the eye, than fa- tisfying the judgment ? * '' A. This feduction is no fmall merit in a painter ; it is an union of the mechanic and ideal ; it is the power of realizing his conceptions ; from which, however, we Should Dial, VI. Q//& Clear obscure. 125 tfhould receive little pleafure, were not thofe conceptions in themfelVes pleafing; for the Flemifh artifts, are in this equal, if not fu perior to any; but their aims are vulgar: But Correggio is, in general, amiable in his ideas, and happy in his expreffions ; he was more conftant in his purfuit of grace than of beauty ; hence he as often out-runs the one, as he falls Short of the other; but the fplendor of his Clear obfcure overbears our cenfure ; and he is to us, what Apelles was to the ancients, the ftandard of the ami able and the graceful, B. Might we not, by blending the Clear obfcure of Correggio, with the compofition of Raphael, form to ourfelves an image of perfect painting ? A. It cannot be denied, that, had the latter been more knowing in this branch of his art, his paintings would have had a much better 126 Of the Clear obscure. Dial. Vf» better effect ; arid yet, nothing is more na tural, than that the event Should be fuch as We find h\ The ideas of Correggio, tend ing ever to pleafe, led him, of courfe, to the difcovery of the means productive of his aim ; Raphael, On the other hand, while he was bufied in tracing the paffions, and intent on determining their movements, was naturally led by the feverity of his pur fuit into a fimplicity, or perhaps, a neglect of colouring. The reafonablenefs of this cbnclufion, is confirmed by an example from antiquity ; Ariftides, who was probably the moft ethic of all their painters, was, as we are told by Pliny, rather hard in his co louring. B. However general the cafe may be, it does not prove that the things are in themfelves difcordant ; on the contrary, you have fatisfied me in the characters of Apelles and Parrhafius, that they may very well Dial. VI. Of the Clear obscure. 127 well exift in one and the fame artift. Can a painter be excufable ; who is weak in the moft effential part of his art, namely, that which gives reality to his, imitations ? His aim, in general, may not be to flatter the eye ; but, it Should be always to fatisfy our feeling. He may think juftly, and convey his thoughts clearly ; yet, his work is but a fbozzo, till, by colouring and the Clear ob fcure, it puts' on the femblance of truth. But, exclufive of the good effect of this fci ence in the general, there are particular cafes, in which it is indifpenfable ; as, in the reprefentations of heavenly and aerial beings: When thefe, inftead of being fu- fpended in a bright and diaphanous glory, are nailed to a muddy fond, or wade through the obstructions of a heavy dawbing, we are offended at the impropriety of their ap pearance ; and the firft thought we have, is, to wonder how they came there. A. The 128 Of the Clear obscure. Dial. Vf. A. The imagination enlightened by the warm and glowing images which it receives from the poets, bears with impatience thofe. gloomy and ponderous bodies, with which our painters people their heavens. The de fect of education in our artifts, is no where fo fenfible, as on thefe occafions-, what fire might a painter catch from the following defcription ? Nor delay' d the winged faint After his charge receiv'd; but from among Thovfand celeflial ardors, where he flood Veil' d with his gorgeous wings, up fpringing light Flew thro' the midfil of Heaven Par. Loft, book v. ver. 247. What an effect of Clear obfcure is hinted in thefe lines ? Hafile hither, Eve, and worth thy fight behold, Eajlward among thofe trees, what glorious fhdpe Comes Dial. VI. Of the Clear obscure. 129 Comes this way moving j ferns another tnofn Ris'n on midnoon.—* Far. Loft, book V. ver. 308. The Italian painters have no excufe. — Ari- ofto and Taffo abound with beautiful and picturefque ideas. There is not, perhaps, a finer image in poetry, than the following one by Taffo. — " Cofi dicendo, fiammeggio di zelo " Per gli occhi fuor del mortal ufo accenfi ; " Pot nel profondo de fuoi rat ft chiufe, " Efparve, — Canto xii. Stanza 93. What a fubject for a fine colourift, to deline ate the form of an angel, retiring and melt ing into the fplendor which furrounds it ? B. The painting of Correggio alone verges on thefe poetic ideas : We acknow ledge in his angels the" inhabitants of hea ven; crayoned in fplendor, pellucid in K glory, 130 Of the Clear obscure. Dial.VL glory, their clear and animated tints breathe a divinity ; they flit in air, like the Skirtings of a palfing cloud, they drop from heaven, like rain through an April fun. A. One would imagine that Pope had been animated with the fpirit of Correggio, and had taken poffeffion of his pencil, when he thus pictured his fylphs r Some in the fields of pur eft ather play, And bafk and whiten in the blaze of day Men of a fuperior genius, view nature through the fame medium, a fine imagina tion j fo that, however different their arts may be in the mechanic part, they will often approach each other in the ideal. Of all the arts, poetry and painting are the moft con genial ; and we may obferve, that as the former never appears more lovely, than when. She dreffes herfelf in the beauties of painting ; fo,. the latter is never fo tranf- porting* Dial. VI. Of the Clear Obscure. I31 porting, as when She emulates the flights, and catches the images of poetry. B< What you have faid in this place of Correggio, is much to his advantage ; but, you juft now treated him rather Slightly on the -article of Beauty', a merit, applied to him by others as peculiar and distinctive : I am at a lofs to account for this opposition of fentiments. A Greek phibfopher being afked, what was Beauty ? Anfwered, This was the [k~\ queftion of a blind man ; yet I am tempted to fubject myfelf to the fame rebuke; for without fome explanation of this matter, we muft ever, in our judg ments on painters, contradict, or talk unin telligibly to one another. A. I should think fuch beauty abfolute, in which we Should find, a purity of co lours, an elegance in the proportions, har- [l] TvpAov to f{o»I«ifia. K 2 mony jt:j2 Of the Clear obscure. Diajl. VI. mony of features, and happinefs of cha racter— B. Excuse me a minute 5 what do you mean in this place by character ? A. I mean that emanation of the mind, which marks its peculiar complexion ; which infpires the features, graces the action, and gives to the whole perfon a particular aim and fignificance. Hence the poet, Thus doth beauty dwell There mofl confpicuous, e'en in outward Jhapet Where dawns the high expreffion of a mind. PI. of the Im. Now the reafon why we differ fo much in our judgments on beauty, is, that in the ufe of this word, we annex to it, fome more, fome fewer of the forementioned ideas ; as each man differst from another, in the caft of his imagination, or the juftnefs of his eye. Thus Dia l.VI. Of the Clear obscure. 133 Thus one, much delighted with the pure and vivid tints of Titian, Shall with difficul ty acknowledge beauty in the grofs com plexions of Raphael, however elegant the proportions, or happy the character. A fecond, to whom harmony of features fills his conception of beauty, Shall admire Car- lo-Maratte ; to the furprife of thofe, who feel no effect from an union of features un enlivened by expreffion. Oppofed to this perfbn Shall be one, with whom character alone Stands for beauty ; thus, when a Ma donna of Correggio gazes on her child, with a fondnefs truly maternal ; or fmiles delight ed with his playful action; he calls that beauty, which a more correct eye (obferving that the proportions are not perfectly juft, and the caft of features, perhaps, even vul gar) Shall admit to be nothing more than a pleafing. expreffion. But, exclufive of thefe particular acceptations, we ufe this word in a fenfe ftill more vague and gene-' K3 ral; 134 Of the Clear obscure. Dial. VI. t ral ; for, as it is the nature of beauty, to excite in the beholders certain pleafing fenfations, we apply indifcriminately the fame title, to every thing which produces a like effect ; and this is evidently the cafe, when we are flattered by the union of co lours, or the charms of the Clear obfcure. Thus, an ancient writer obferves, " [/] That " the moft oppofite colours co-operate in " the formation of beauty :" A testimony, which not only ferves my prefent purpofe, but likewife, brings the paintings of the ancients into the fame point of view with thofe of Correggio ; Shewing, that this laft fpecies of beauty was equally known and cultivated by both. B. Though, what you have offered, be applied only to painting, may we not extend it to common life ; and account, from hence, [/] Ta tuaftutlula rm xZvpulvt e; t»» tow KaKtavs ervt- 8w>i» OftoXayu. i for Dial. VI. Of the Clear obscure. 135 for the difference of our opinions, concern ing the beauty of women ; each man esteem ing her moft beautiful, who moft readily excites in him thofe fenfations, which are the end of beauty ? A. Our Britifh Lucretius, it Should feem, thought fo, when he tells us, that virtue — AJfumes a various feature, to at trail With charms refponfive to each gazers eye The hearts of men. PI. of the Im, K 4 D I A- [ n$ 1 DIALOGUE VII. Of Composition. A. TJISTORY Painting is the repre- JLjL fentation of a momentary dra ma : We may therefore, in treating of com position, borrow our ideas from the Stage ; and divide it into two parts, the fcenery, and the drama. The excellence of the firft, conSifts in a pleafing difpofition of the fi gures which compofe the action : However trifling the pleafure we receive from this may appear to fome, it is certain, that it is founded on nature, and of courfe muft me rit our attention : If we look in a clear night on a ftarry Sky, our eyes prefently fix on thofe parts, where the ftars are (if 1 may fo term Dial. VII. Of Co m p os it ion. 137 term it) grouped into conftellations. The mind, indifferent to a loofe unideal difper- fion, leeks for fomething of fyftem and ceconomy ; and catches at every image of contrivance and defign. Perhaps too, there may be fomething of harmony in a particu lar arrangement of objects ; fimilar to that, which Strikes us, in the correspondence of founds, or flatters us, in the union of colours. B. Whatever the principle may be, we cannot doubt of the effect. The eye charm ed with the elegant diftribution of a Lan- franc, or Pietro diCortona, looks with cold- nefs on the fcattered compositions of a Do- menichino; and often wifhes for fomething more flattering in thofe of the great Ra phael. A. Your obfervation, fo far as it touches Raphael, Shews the neceffity of a diftindion in 13& Of Composition. Dial. VII. in this place. The difpofition, of which we have been Speaking hitherto, is purely picturefque : But there is a fecond kind, which we may call the expreSfive. When many perfons are prefent at an action, in which they are interested, it naturally fets them in motion ; their movements will de pend on their characters and feeling ; an ger, love, or aftoniShment, Shall with pro priety be expreffed by fingle figures ; whilft others Shall be collected into parties, or groupes, to communicate their fears, doubts, belief* and the like. Thus, in that inimi table picture by Leonardo da Vinci, when Chrift, at fupper with his difciples, declares, that one of them Shalt betray him ; they all inftantly take the alarm ; One of the youngeft, rifing from his feat, his bands crofted on his bread, looks on Chrift with an action full of love and attachment to bis perfon -, the zealous and impatient St. Pe ter, throws himfelf a-crofs two or three others, Dial. VII. O/Cqm posit i on. 139 others, and whifpers the beloved difciple, who is next to Chrift ; no doubt, to aSk his mafter who it Should be. The reft are di vided into parties, reafoning and difputinc on their different fentiments. It is eafy to perceive, that the artift, intent on giving a full expreffion to the fentiments and paffions becoming the occafion, confidered the .dif pofition of his picture, merely, as it tended to explain or add force to his principal ac tion. This will ever be the cafe with the greateft painters : They may fet a juft va lue on the fcenery of their piece, but never facrifice to that the expreffion of their fub ject. When Chrift gives the keys to Peter, nothing is more natural, than that the dif- ciples Should all crowd together, to be wit- neffes of an action which fo much concern ed them. This difpofition is true and ex- preffive, but by no means picturefque: Raphael was too wife, to flatter the eye, at the expence of the understanding ; yet, where 14© Of Com position. Dial. VII. wlbare they could both be indulged with propriety, his eompofition was no lefs pic- tmireJqiue than expreffive. In his St. Paul preaching at Athens, the difpofition in ge neral is not only pleafing, but the groupes are well imaged, and happily connected. In Jbrartt, the true difference between thefe ar tifts, is this, with Raphael and Leonardo da Vinci,, difpofition is an acceflbry ; with Lauafranc and Pietro di Cortona, it is not only a principal, but comprehends too often the whole merit of the picture. B. Having fettled our ideas of this part, which you call the fcenery of painting ; let os, if you pleafe, examine the merit of the ancients in this article : It is the received opinion, I think, that their compositions. in painting, like thofe of their baffo Re lievo's, were extremely fimple ; if fo, I cannot expect much from you on this head. A. This Dial. VII. O/Compositiok. 141 A. Th 1 s opinion, is a neceffary comfe- quence of that, which I have already men tioned, namely, that they were unacquairat- ed with the laws of perfpective, and the ef fects of the clear obfcure. If the contrasy of this be true, which, it feems to me, I have proved ; we may very well conclude, that, poffeffed of the fame means with the mo derns, and at leaft equal to them in getamis, they Should employ them to the fameemis. Was their composition fo fimple as it is thought, there could be, in this pjitkular, no variety in the art, and, of courfe, no de grees of merit in the artifts. Yet, we are told by Pliny, " [7] That Apelles confefed " Amphion to be his fuperior in the dif- ** pofition : It was then an object of atten tion ; it muft have been too, in the opinion of the ancients, of confequence ; for, the [/] Cedebat Amphioni de Difpofitione. historian 142 0/ Composition. Dial. VfL historian gives it as an extraordinary in stance pf [w] candor in the painter. It is probable then, that, as Apelles was the Ra phael, fo Amphion was the Lanfranc of Greece. B. I am inclined to believe from hence, that the firft painters among the ancients^ like thofe among the moderns, were, as it is natural they Should be, more ftudious of the expreffive than the picturefque ; and this may be the reafon why the claffic writers, who borrowed their ideas of painting from their capital works, have not dwelt on the article of difpofition ; looking on it as a circumstance infeparable from the general expreffion of the fubject. A. And yet they are not altogether filent on this head : And we may find, even in [*»] Fuit Apelles non minoris fimplicitatis quam ar tis ; nam cedebat, &c. Lib. xxxv. c. 10. them, Dial. VII. Ojt"Composition. 143 them, fufficient lights to fatisfy thofe, who fet out with a good opinion of the tafte and genius of the ancients. Plutarch tells us, that Euphranor painted the engagement of the cavalry at the battle of Mantinea, [»] as if he had been infpired. The painter had ne ver merited fuch fingular praife, had he not wrought his fubject to the neareftfemblance to truth ; and that this could not have been, without a particular attention to the difpofi tion, the fame writer proves in another in- ftance ; when, fpeaking of the battle fought by Araftus againft the Etolians, he adds, that Timanthes the painter, brought this action, as it were, before the eyes of the beholders, by the [0] evidence of his difpofi tion. Thus, it is plain, that the infpiration of Euphranor, and the evidence of Timan thes, flowed from the fame excellence, aa [»] Ovx amiovo-turuf. De Gloria Athen. p. 346. Ed. Paris. fa] Eft^aHtxat r? StxQecrtt. In Arato, p. 1042. union 144 O/Com position. Dial. VII. union of the two kinds of difpofition, the expreffive, and the picturefque. B. Having thus raifed the curtain and examined the fcenery, let us proceed to . what you call the drama of painting. A. It was with great propriety So termed by the ancients ; becaufe, like a dramatic poem, it contains, firft, a fubject, or fable : fecondly, its order, or contrivance ; thirdly, ¦characters, or the manners : Fourthly, the various paffions which fpring from thofe characters, Philoftratus, fpeaking of the compofition of a picture, calls it in exprefs terms the \f\ drama of the painter : Pliny has [q] the fame idea, in his commendation of Nichophanes. But, we Shall be better fa tisfied of the juflnefs of this application, f^J To Seujia Tow Quiy)>a!5 TD^«!f, uvircg tod? ftuQou; tuv wof&oii. Dem. Phal. de eloc. § j6. L jects 146 Of Composition. Dial. VII. jedts are, for the moft part, taken from a re ligion, which profeffes to banifh, or fubdue the paffions : Their characters are borrowed from the loweft fpheres of life : Men, in whom, meahnefs of birth, and Simplicity of manners, were the beft titles to their election. Even their divine maSter, is nowhere, in# painting, attended with a great idea ; his long Strait hair, jewifh beard, and poor ap parel, would undignify die moft exalted na ture, humility and refignation, his charac teristics, are qualities extremely edifying, but by no means picturefque. Let us, for example, compare (I muft be understood to mean only as fubjects for painting) a Chrift armed with a Scourge, driving the money* changers out of the temple, to an Alexan der, the thunder in his hand, ready to dart it on the rebellious nations. It is not in the fublime alone, that their fubjects are defi cient ; they are equally So in the pathetic : The Sufferings, which they moftly reprefent, are Dial. VII. (^Composition. 147 are in obedience to prophecies and the will of beaven ; they are often the choice of the fufferers; and a ten-fold premium is at hand. When St. Andrew falls down to wor ship the crofs, On which he is foon after to be nailed ; we maybe improved by fuch an example of piety and zeal ; but we can not feel for one, who is not concerned for himfelf. We are not fo calm at the facri- fice of Iphigehia ; beautiful, innocent, and unhappy.; we look upon her as the victim of an unjuft decree ; She might live the ob ject of univerfal love ; She dies the .object of univerfal pity. This defect in the fubject, and of habitude in the painters, accounts for the coldnefs, with which, we look in ge neral on their works in the galleries and churches ; the genius of painting wafting its powers on crucifixions, holy families, laft Slippers, and the like, wants nerves, if at any time the fubject calls for the pathe tic or fublime : Of this we have an inftance L 2 in 148 Of Compos iti on. Dial. VII. in the transfiguration by Raphael ; a Chrift uplifted by a divine energy, dilating in glo ry, and growing into divinity, was a fubject truly fublime ; it is eafy to fee, on this oc cafion, that the painter had not that enthu- fiaftic fpirit, or thofe ideas of majefty, which the fubject required : Accordingly, his pen cil is timid and unequal : It is not fo, when he drops to the bottom of the mount, to ex prefs the various feelings and fentiments of the difciples, diftreffed at their inability to work a miracle in their mafters abfence. The truth was, his calm, though fertile ge nius, could better delineate the fine and de licate movements of the mind, which have in them more of fentiment than paffion. This was his true fphere, and it is here, that we muft ftudy, and admire Raphael. B. Your obfervations on the character of Raphael, Show, how effential to painting is that, which you call the third part of the drama, Dial. VII. 0/ Composition. 149 drama, namely, the characters or man ners. 1 A. The ancients thought them fo much fo, that they exprefsly term picture [s] an art defcriptive of the manners. Ariftotle in his poetics, fays of Polygnotus, that he was a [/] painter of the manners ; and ob jects to Zeuxis his weaknefs in this part. We have in Philoftratus the following de- ' fcription of a picture ; " [a] We may in- " ftantly (fays he) distinguish Ulyffes, by " his feverity and vigilance ; Menelaus, by [*] hSowoidIo? t-=x»i- Calliftratus in Defcrip. ftat.igfcul. [f] HOoypaCSo?. Ariftides Thebanus animum pinxit, et fenfus omnes expreffit, quos vocant Grzeci n9« ; id eft, perturbationes. Piin. lib. xxxv. 10. [it] EwiStiXos a JI.CV lOaJWioc, an Toy revtyyov xat cypr,- yopfloi, 0 St AyafA.cji.yay, unto tov cvQsov, Toy Se roy TvScut sAEfOsgia ypatpii, yi/agigoij Say xat Tot 'Yth.aft.'Mtoy, ano Too Qhoavipov, xat toy Aokjou aico toh Iroifcov. Philoftrat. in in Antilocho. L % is I5° 0/ C o mp os iti on. Dial. VII. " his mildnefs ; and Agamemnon, by a " kind of divine majefty ; in the fon of " Tydeus, is expreffed an air of freedom ; " Ajax is known by his fallen fiercenefs ; " and Antilochus by his alertnefs." To give to thefe fuch fentiments and actions, as are confequential from their peculiar charac ters, is [x~\ the ethic of painting. We may judge from hence, how ad vantagious it muft be to painters in general, to be verfed in claffical fubjects ; for, they find themfelves under a neceffity of expreffing the manners as they flow naturally from characters pre determined. The [y~] Greek painters caught their ideas from hiftorians and poets, and translated the beauties of eloquence into paint. 5. H o w wonderful muft have been that genius, which, without thefe advantages, [x] H(W trapta. -Callift. in Defcrip. fiat. Narciffi. ly] Apelles pinxit Dianam facrificantitrm virginum choro miftam ; quibus viciffe Homeri vwfas videtur, id ipfum, defcribentis. Plin. lib. xxxv. c. 10. has Dial. VII. Of Com p Os i t i on. 151 has all their effects ? Such was our divine Raphael : He treats new fubjects ; he in vents new characters : The moft unpictu- refque action, compofed by him, Seems to have been deftined for paint : Chrift gives the keys to Peter ; how barren the incident ! yet his pencil, like the rod of Mofes, Strikes a fpring out of this rock. A. You have defcribed that facility, which is the gift of genius, and the image of truth : This does not confift wholly, as may be imagined, in the ready execution of a con ceived idea ; but in the immediate percep tion of the juftnefs of that idea ; in a con- fummate knowledge of the human heart, its various affections, and the juft meafure of their influence on our looks and geftures ; eafy in promife, but difficult of execution; unknown, unattainable by the herd of paint ers, it drops from the pencil of a Raphael, Correggio, or Leonardo da Vinci. This l 4 iuality 152 Of Composition. Dial. VII. quality was confidered by the ancients as the fureft teft of genius ; thus Plutarch praifes the paintings of {zj Nicomachus, compar ing them, in happinefs and facility, to the poetry of Homer. Apelles affirmed him felf inferior in fome points to other painters j but in this unrivalled. If we except the, three, I juft now mentioned, we Should in vain look for this knowledge, in the crowd of modern painters. Contented with tole rable drawing, fome air of beauty, and a good caft of drapery, they abandon charac ter to the accident of features ; their dra matis perfonee, if we can call them fuch, are like the followers of iEneas, many actors with one face, fortemque Gyam, fortemque Cloanthum; the different echoes of one poor idea : Such characters are fo far from grow- [ss] T«i? Sc Ntxoftaxfiv yputputt xat Toi? °0//,))§«y rix°'f» f**J<* T»5 ***»? Svyapius xat ajagilo?, •srfousri to Soxctv ivx'&H xat guSta; umtpyuStut, la, Tim. QJe- onte, p. 253. Ed. Paris. ing DiAl.VII. 0/ Composition. 153 ing out of the fubject, that they have always the air of Exotics, and feem fitter for any fpot than that in which they are. Inftead of placing the Bacchus and Ariadne of Car- rache, in a triumphal car ; we might put the miftrefs into a cart, and fet her lover to drive it. B. The profeffors of the art, who praife fo warmly the paintings in the palace Far- nefe, Should distinguish better the mechanic part from the ideal. I have never feen them without regretting, that fuch a hand to exe cute Should haye been fo ill prompted. A composition of this kind, though it be rich in all the other powers of paint, if it has neither beauty nor characters becoming the fubjects, will be confidered by a judicious obferver, rather as the furniture than orna ment of a gallery, A. To 154 Qf Composition. Dial. VII. A. To reprefent a Juno without majefty, or a Venus without beauty, is an infult on our underftandings ; the peacock and dove, are not the means of diftinction we look for : The [a] Juno of Polycletus is defcribed by Maximus Tyrius, with fnow white arms, ivory Shoulders, beautiful eyes, in royal robes, of a majeftic mien, and feat- ed on a throne of gold. B. The modern ftatuaries are fo wholly void of character, that they are not to be [a] Hga», oi'av Tlo^vxheflo; Apyetoti; cShJ-c, \ivxu>£yoy, i%i§ui[J/u« XHi iaa9ti. [g] Timanthi vel plurimum aiFait ingenii: Ejus enim eft Iphigenia oratorum laudibus celebrata ; qua ftante ad aras peritura, cum mceftos pinxiflet omnes, prsecipue patruum, cum triftitiac omnem imaginem confumfiffet, Patris ipfius vultum velavit, quem. digne non poterat oftendere. Lib. xxxv. c. 10. It has been imagined that Timanthes borrowed this thought from the following paflage in Sophocles. ' '" Ji? S' icetotv AyafJt.cy.yay ayai, Etti etyayas r&xovcray «s aAffo; xoprn, Aycrtyu^c' xa'fvua'Kty f^n^as xapa, Aaxpvu vrcwycy, oj/.j/.dlay tXiTrtot ro^ofl«f. in 160 Of Composition. Dial. VII. in his defcription of that famous picture of the Sacrifice of Iphigenia, by Timanthes,, obferves, " that the painter having exhauft- " ed every image of grief in the by-ftanders, *' and above all in the uncle ; threw a veil " over the face of the father, whofe forrow «* he was unable to exprefs." If the ingeni ous Timanthes has left us to conceive an idea, which he could not execute, Ariftides, on the other hand, has executed that which is almoft above conception ; by him was painted " [¥] a town taken by ftorm, in *< which was feen an infant creeping to the " breaft of its mother, who, though ex- " piring from her wounds, yet expreffes an " apprehenfion and fear leaft the courfe of " her milk being ftopt, the child Should * fuck her blood.'* What a perfect know- [£] Hujus pi&ura eft, oppido capto, ad matris mo- jientis e vulnere mammam adrepens infans : Intelligi- turque fentire mater, et timere, ne emortuo lacle fan- guinem infans-lambat. Plin. lib. xxxv. c. 10. a ledge Dial. Vlf. Of Co m p osit ion; i6r ledge of the human foul muft this painter have had, to enter thus feelingly into her inmoft workings ! What a power, next to creative, to make fuch tender movements fenfible in the midft of tortures % and the mother's fondnefs distinguishable through the agonies of death ? This picture, it is probable, gave occafion to the following epigram [*']. Suck, little wretch, whilfl yet thy mother lives± : .- Suck the laft drop her fainting bofom gives. She dies ; her' tendernefs outlafils her breath, And her fond love is provident in death. The Philoctetes of Parrhafius is a fine image! of hopelefs wretchednefs, of confuming grief. The picture itfelf is happily defcribed by the [»'] "EtoM, rukuy, nsapa fmlgoj %y ovx sit puSpt «f«?ifft?» 'ihxv ?ito« xat eiv aiSui GtatSoKofAtty cpaQor. Anthol. lib. iii. M epigram- i6z Of Com p osition. Dial. VII. epigrammatift, and the compliment to the painter, has the elegance and fimplicity pe culiar to the Greeks [k]. Drawn by Parrhafius, as in per f on view'd, Sad Phihtletes feels his pains renew' d. In his parch' d eyes the deep-funk tears exprefs > His endlefs mifery, his dire dijlrefs. We blame thee, painter, tho' thy art commend ; *Twas time his fufferings with himfelf Jhottld end. We cannot well conceive an image more tender, or more affecting than this. Let terror be united with pity, the mufe of painting has completed her drama. Of this*. the Ajax and Medea of Timomachus are \ky Kutl to» atto Tfuppws $„, wofciwoW „*{» TovJe GiWMijir eypalps Tlaftwio;. . E» Te yx( 9p6a\ftoit icxTtwvxn xutpw tiWoisn &u*pv, xat i tpv%u alof mrt /\' aya71a.vaa.tt AxSe* luotwy nSr, to, «tityw;g9«, tSu. Authol. lib. ir. beautiful Dial. VII. Of Comp osItio n. 163 beautiful examples ; they are but juft men tioned by Ovid in the following lines [/J : Here Aj ax fits with fullen rage opprefs'd; And in Medea's eyes her crime's confefd. Philoftratus is more particular as to the for mer : [*»] We cantiot (fays he) do juftice to the Ajax of Timomachus, whom he repre- fents diftracted, unleSs we previously form in our minds the image of his condition y and how natural it was, after the follies he. had committed, that he fhould fit down, overwhelmed with Shame, entering on the refolution to deftroy himfelf. This obfer- [/] Utque fedet vultu faflus Telamonius iram ; Inque oculis facinus Barbara rriater fiabet. Lib. ii. Trift. [»] OwJ* ay To» Atayla Ti{ to» Tiftofiupffxi uyua^ctc, i< Sri ayaytygawlat avla f*s/»ij»w,-, si ft.it atahaZat Ti; e; rot youy Ataylof ttSahoy, xat at fixo; av%y amxlovola t<* it T)j Tpata, ffovxollfu, xa6r)o-9at altupviKola, @ov\i)y tsotouuiitot xat Jewju Klmui. Lib. ii. de vha Apollonii, c. 10. M 2 vatior* 164. Of Composition. Dial. VlL vation of the historian, will ferve .us as a comment on the epigrammatift [»]. Here art with nature holds a doubtful Jlrife, And fummons Ay ax to a fecond Ufe ; We fee thee raging, and in every line The painter's fury rifes ftill with thine : Thy looks the anguifh of thy foul difclofe, And the mix'd tear is charged with all thy woes. The Medea was a fubject of emulation to the wits of Greece ; each contending to do juftice to thofe inimitable expreffions, which they thus defcribe [o\ t Medea, painter', now provokes thyfkill, Hop'fii thou to piclure a divided will? f»] Away Ttptopax'0 ***E°» 1 tad\goi' i^iraffc nx*x T«r (pvatv. . "O ypa^/a( etSc at fi.aty%ff.cyoy, Kai avKr\vacr$i\ yj-tp aycpt' Kat fa xspura Aaxpva Tou; /\vmt •crailaf tfu |e roonou?. Anthol. lib. iv. [o] Tan lt\oay MnSttat or cyoajpc Ti(*ofu»^oy xui* Z«?i«, xat tw»oi; aflifM&EtaofMMw" •Di-al.VIL Of Compos it i on. 165 'Tts done : Behold, united by his art The lovers frenzy, and the mother's heart ; Mark how the ftrugglings of her foul appear ; Here fury flajhesi and there melts a tear. 'Twas well, her purpofe only you exprefs 'd, ' Who but Medea could fupport the reft ? The fame is touch'd again with great fpirit in the following epigram \_p~\ : What ventrous hand the curs' d Medea drew ? And brought the parricide once more in view t MfgioJ ajalo fto^ftoii IV i$cu Staau %«£«£ )), flu To fkcy ei; opyuv ycos, To S ei; c7\ioy. Afityao citTttipaatt, op* tuttoh" ct yap airct/\a, Aaxpvov, eii S' eXeu, Stifioi ayar^cfUat. Agxtt S d.y fAETiTiq^"!;, ctpa aoCpo;. aifia Sc rcxytit 'Eirpciri Mrihtri, x ov %cet Tiftofta%oo. Anthol. lib. iv. \f\ Ti; (rov, KoX^jk a6si7ftE, avtiypatyct tiaoni &ap.oy ; Ti; xat ti stSaTvj QapZuppy ttpyuau\o ; . AlEI yap Svfyus (igilpcay (pom' n T»; lt)a»» AeuIejo;, d T/\uvxti T15 iaat\t ant inpptyaat% ; "S.PPC, xat ct xqpa matSoxloyi' erat ya£ uftclgat Zrthm, ei; a SeAej;, xai ygapi; atobuvtlat. Anthol. lib. iv. ¦¦ M 3 Art i6£ Of Composition. Dial. VIL Art thou by flighted love provoi'd again In thy child's blood thy impious hands tojlain? Off murdrefs I ev'n in paint thy crimes we fear ; And all the horrors of thy foul are here. B. It muft be confeffed, that if thefe ar tifts were happy in their power to pleafe, they were no lefs f6, in having fuch feeling critics, fo capable of tranfmitting their me rit to posterity. We too have our Share in thishappinefsj thefe defcriptions are fo juft,. fo lively, fo distinguishing, that we may look upon them as copies of thofe divine ori ginals. The moderns have not this advan tage ; all ideas of their works will vanifh with their colours. When Arioftp cele brates Michael Angelo in the following line, *' E Michael, piu che mortal, Angel divino.'* this praife is exceffive, not decisive ; it car- lies no idea, A. The DrAL.VII. Of Composition. 167 A. The reafon is obvious, the artift did not furnifh the poet with any. Had the painters of Italy produced fuch expreffions as thofe of the Ajax and Medea, the wits of that country, would not have been want ing in doing them juftice. I may, perhaps, appear too general, when I include even Raphael in this obfervation ; but if you re flect, you will find, that his expreffions are more addreffed to the understanding than the paffions : They are more to be admir ed for their variety than force ; they have little, either of the pathetic or fublime ; and the images which they leave in the mind, Slip from it, almoft as haftily, as the picture from the eye. It is not fo with the paint ings of Timomachus and Ariftides; the impreffionswe receive from them Strike full upon the foul ; they dilate it, like the burfts in the mufick of Boranello ; they agitate, they rouze-it, like the fymphonies of Yeo- M 4 fflelli 1 68 0/ C o m p o s i t i o n. Dial. VII? melli ; Such expreffions, (as was obferved of the eloquence of Pericles) leave Stings behind them. The fuperiority which I have here attributed to the ancients, in the* comparifon of their excellencies with thofe of Raphael, is no way injurious to the lat ter ; it is but placing his merit in a juft point of view. The epithets of great and divine, fo constantly beftowed upon him, carry with them every circumstance of per fection : We may be, and are often led by thefe into wrong judgments : Let us, if you pleafe, examine his principal works : we have already taken notice of his conduct in the transfiguration, and of his preference of the humbler to the more exalted fubject ; in this he did but obey the true biafs of his genius : The difciples, in the abfence of their mafter, had attempted to difpoffefs a de moniac -, they failed in their attempt : The painter feizes this moment to exprefs their i furprife Dial.VIL. Of C o m p o s i t i o n. 1&9 furprize and concern at their difappoint- ment: Their fentiments on the occafion, are finely varied: and happily adapted to their different characters. The beauties of' this picture are to be felt, not defcribed ; but yet they are beauties of an inferior order [q]. They fatisfy the understanding, but they do not touch the heart. B. As to your criticifm on the transfigu ration of Chrift, you muft confider, that to Have given it its full effect, the fplendors of the Clear obfcure, muft have co-operated with the fublime in the idea : For this rea fon, it is probable, Raphael did not care to engage himfelf too far in fuch a fubject. Had he conceived, that he was unequal tq. the fublime, he never would have attempt ed the hiftory of the creation. [a] In affeftibus fere plus calor, quam diligentia, valet. Quint. A. A iyo Of Compos iti on. Dial. VII. A. A subject great in conception,. may become little in the execution. God the Creator, prefiding in the center of the »niverfe4 and ordering by his mighty fiat, the fun and moon to break into existence, is a fubject truly fublime : But, when this is reprefented, [r] by the figure of a man, fufpended in the air, with one hand on the fun, and the other on the moon, that, which was noble to the imagination, js trifling to the eye. The immenfity of our idea Shrinks {r} The littlenefs of this idea will beft appear, by comparing it with fuch as are truly great, — — Ride forth, and bid the deep, Within appointed bounds be biaven and earth. And in immediate confequence, Firfl in his eafi the glorious lamp nvasfcen, Regent of day. Par. Loft. Such a fubjedT: as thb will not admit of a mechanick image ; we have a proof of this, when the fame poet anhappily puts a compafs into the hands of theAK jaighty Agent. to Dial. VII. 0/ Com posit ion. 17* to nothing, reduced to a world of a few inches. The fubject, therefore, was inju diciously chofen, and poorly treated. In the fame manner, when we reflect on that act, when God commanded the animals of the earth, to fpring from duft into life, we are filled with the higheft conception of his power ; but, when we fee, in the midft of numberlefs beafts, an old man, with eyes of diminished luftre, a wrinkled forehead, a long beard, and his" robe hanging to the ground, we niay acknowledge the venerable Merlin, but we have no lines of our Creator. Such fymptoms of caducity do not fuit with the divine nature ; if he is to be reprefented, it muft be, by a fublime idea, a character of majefty more than human; fuch as was imagined by Hotner, and executed " by Phidias. 2. Plutarch jyi Of Composition. Dial. VIX- B. [s] Plutarch fuppofes fuch an idea in the Alexander of Apelles, perfonating Jupiter the Thunderer ; which, according to this writer, was painted with fuch energy and truth, that it " gave occafion to a " faying, that there were two Alexanders, ** the one of Philip, invineible ; the other " of Apelles, inimitable." We learn from the fame author, that Lyfippus was no lefs ingenious than fublime, when he drew from a flight inclination of the neck, which was natural to Alexander, the hint of a great, expreffion ; reprefenting him looking up to heaven, with that manly boldnefs, that commanding majefty, which are thus hap, pily marked by the epigrammatist [/]. pj Eyfatl* Ton' xipuvyopogiy oo'tu; E»agya; xai xcx'pu- fcEvw;, art Jayitv, 0T1 Svoty AtKc^aySpay, o ficy QtCKifrffov ycyostt attxvlo;, i Sc AitctWov uftifA,*\oc,. De Fort, vel Virt. M.Alex, p. 335. Ed. Paris. ¦ ¦, W AvSaaovylt ^' eoikeii 0 x^xcof ei; Ata Ttevaaay' ray uir tft.ot TiQfftaij Ztv, av S' titWfWiw sjje. Let Di al. VIL Of Composition, 173 Let us divide, O Jove ! the conqueror cries ; I lord of earth, thou, tyrant of thefkies. A. We muft not expect fuch expreffions as thefe from the pencil of Raphael ; would you fee him in his true character, obferve where the angel turns our firft parents out of paradife ; it is plain, that he acts in obe dience to a command ; he lays his finger gently on the Shoulder of Adam, and marks, by a certain tendernefs of action, a compaf- fion of their paft weaknefs, and prefent mi- fery. It is in tracing thefe flight and lefs obvious movements of the mihd, that this amiable painter Shows the true beauty of his genius ; more excellent, perhaps, in ex- preffing fuch feelings, in that he was not transported by the more violent. I have now brought you into the gallery of die Vatican ; we muft enter the apartments ; though 'we have little to do there ; for, of all 174 Of Composition. Dial. Vlf. all the works of Raphael, thefe the moft ce lebrated for the painting, are the leaft to be noted for expreffion. An affembly of Chri- ftian doctors, or of Heathen philofophers, are fubjects of no motion. Heliodorus. driven by angels out of the temple, pro mises expreffion; but his terror is a grimace. When the angel vifits St. Peter in prifon, we might reafonably expect, in the counte nance and action of the faint, fome kind of emotion ; how do we find him ? faft afleep ; could Giotto have done lefs ? In the action of Attila, indeed, there is fomewhat of dig nity and fpirit ; but it would diftrefs the moft Sanguine admirers of Raphael, to pro- duce,from this feries of painting, fuch exam ples of the pathetic or fublime, as might entitle him to be ranked with the firft painty ers of antiquity. B. I SHALL Dial. VII. Of Composition. 175 B. I shaei. excufe your entering on a particular examination of the hiftory of Pfyche, or the banquet of the gods ; per fuaded, that you would find the paintings at the palace Chigi, as destitute of the ex-: preffions you look for, as you have already found thofe of the Vatican. Yet we muft acknowledge an uncommon energy and fpi rit in the flight of Mercury ; and it has been obferved, that the painter has, with wonderful art, given to Pluto, Neptune, and Jupiter, diftindt characters, yet preferved in all a brotherly likenef$. A. It would have done more honour ta of the Centaur of Zeuxis : How excellent in the mechanic ? what novelty, what boldnefs in the ideal ? Let fuch traits of genius be the character- O iftic 194 (^.Composition. Dial. Vlfc iftic of the antique ; I Shall not difpute with thofe, who admire the picturefque difpofU- tion, the- multiplied characters, and labour ed compofitions of the moderns. B. I find, thefe laft have in you but a falfe friend ; you joined their party juft now,; in the praife you gave to Raphael, only to t;urn upon them with more violence, when the occafion offered— A. I am a fincere admirer of the fagaci- ty and refpurces of Raphael ; but lam more moved by one great expreffion, than by fe-v vera! minute ones. There is generally, in, thefe laft, fomething equivocal and unde cisive j they are often made out more, by, the imagination of the beholders, than by the pencil of che painter : To fome, they. convey imperfect ideas-, to pthers, diffe rent. I hardly have known any two agree in "Dial. VII. 'Of C o m*p b s i t i o n. 1-^5 in the fentiments which they imputed to the: feveral auditors Of St. Paul, I attempted juft now a hiftory of the feelings of the dif- ciples, on the preference given to Peter ; fome are obvious ; but it is poffible you hiay differ from nie in many others. At beft, they muft be ftudied to be underftood ; this weakens and fubdivides the effect : It is not fo in the pathetic, or fublime. In the dying mother of Arid ides, the Medea of Timomachus, the Alexander of Apelles, the ideas are manifest'; the.expretlibns de- cifive; and, we can no more confound, than we can forget, the effects which they produce ¦ ¦ - v B. But, granting that the chief merit of the arts Should, as you fay, corifift in great : or forcible expreffions, are not instances of j thefe to be found in modern painting ? O 2 A. Had icjo" Of C 6 m p o $ i t row. Dial. VH. A- Hah I known of; any comparable to thofe, which I have quoted from the an tique, they. Should certainly ha^e had the preference ; for whatever, might have given occafion to thefe difcourfes, my defign waSy much more, to fettle our ideas of the art, than the pretenfions of the artifts. B. Ma? it not be objected, that thefe ad vantages, which you have fuppofed on the fide of the ancients, might have exifted more in the defcriptions, than in the works themfelves ? A. When any work can be produced of modern art, equal, in the fublime, to the Apollo; in expreffion, to the Laocoon; in grace and beauty, to thp daughter of Ni- .. obe ; I Shall allow 'the force of this objec tion. With regard to thefe, as I have al- 2 ready Dl'ftL. VII. 0/"COMPOS1TION. I97 ready obferved, the caufe of painting and ftatuary is the fame.1 As to compofition, the grand point is expreffion $ colouring and the clear obfcure are proper to .paint j how far the ancients excelled in thefe, ex clusive of all «ther proofs, might be pre- fumed from their fuperior genius, and inde fatigable application. And now, I hope you have received, from this inquiry, the fatisfaction I promifed you at our firft fet ting out. Our purfuit has not beein altoge ther technical ; a fine idea, Whether it be Conveyed in colours or words, tends equally to improve and enlighten the imagination -, and, you cannot but have obferved all along, a conftant and pleafing refemblance^ in the conceptions of the Greek artifts, to thofe Of their poets. The fame ftyle of great nefs, the fame ftrokes of tendernefs, the Same vein of elegance and Simplicity Shine through and beautify their works. B. This ig8 Of C OM PO.S-1 T ION. Dial. ¥H. B. This may well be expected from the known analogy in the operations and. powers of the two arts : Hence it is, that we can with juftnefs transfer, from one to the other the terms proper to each ; and, as poetry is often but the colouring of words^ So painting may be ftyled the eloquence of colours.. A. The lively and natural effects of paint ing, are in nothing more, fenfible, than in the delight the poets take, in. borrowing their images and .metaphors from her. Hence they learn to, groupe and arrange their objects ¦, to Shade and illumine their figures; to draw the outlines of grace; to lay on the tints of beauty ; and all the car louring of words brigjitens as from the' touches of the pencil. This correfpoa- -dence prevails, not only in what relates, to defcription, DfAL.VII. Of Composition.'^ 199 defcription, but even in the very effentials pf each art. Was I to obferve, that there wete grace and beauty in the perfons ; juft-i nefs in the Sentiments; warmth and fpirit in the paffions ; I at once defcribe a good poem, or a good picture. As it is the- character of fine writing, fo it is of excel lent painting, that the thoughts Should be natural, not obvious ; elegant, not re mote. \h\ A Greek artift, having painted a naval engagement on the river Nile, it was heceffary to mark the fcene of action ; to this end, he represented an afs feeding on its bank, beneath which was couched ; a crocodile, ready to fpring upon his prey. A modern would have planted at one end a river god, with water iffuing from feven urns ; and this1, with no fmall conceit of his erudition. The fameTfimplicity and happi- nefs Pf invention are attributed in gene- \h\ Nealces, ingeniofus et folers in arte. - Plin. lib. xxxv. c. 1 z. raj 200 Of Com position. Dial. VII. ral to the paintings of Timanthes ; in one of which, he reprt-efented, in a little picture, a cyclops Sleeping, and, to give an extra ordinary idea of his fi2«V near him were drawn fome fatyrs, meafuriiig his finger with a thyrfus. On which occafion, Plinjr makes this remark, *' \c\ In all his works' " there is more understood than expreffed ; •* and though his execution be mafterly, '* yet his ideas exceed it." This is, in So- many wordSfc a defcription of the poetry of Virgil. A circumftance, extretoely favour able to the Greek artifts, that the praifes due Eft that divine poet, Should be no lefs applicable to this excellent painter. [c] In omnibus ejus operibus intelligitur plus femper quam pingittir j et cum ars famma fit,' ingenium tamen; ultra artem eft. Lib. xxxv. c. 10. F IN I S. ;.•>-..' . ft ¦ i'1 — i , ¦ ,. ERRATA. Pigs 46. In note [1] for hoe peftoray rtatf hoc psaore, Page 56. tele i.far charafterlck, read charaQerifli^k. Page 14 j. line 13, fir Araftus, nad Arawi. a39002 003183291b