II V Preservation of this book has been made possible by a gift to the Yale University Library from Thomas H. O'Flaherty, '56 B.s. and '60 j.d., and Ellen J. O'Flaherty, '60 M.S. and '64 ph.d. _SS2_S<2_£2aoSLOmtfar. PATRONS. James Madison, of Va. Gerrit Smith, Esq. N. Y. Chief Justice Marshall, do. Elliott Cresson, Esq. Rt. Rev. Wm. White, D.D. Wm. Short, Esq. PRESIDENT. Rev. John Bkecktnmdge. VICE PRESIDENTS. Jos. R. Ingersoll, Esq. Rev. W. H. De Laneey, D.D. Rev. A. Barnes, Rev. H. A. Boardman, Dr. John Bell, Gerard Ralston, Esq. Matthew Newkirk, Esq. Alexander Mitchell, M. D. Benjamin Naglee, Esq. Joseph Dugan, Esq. Hon. Joseph M'llvaine, TREASURER.Lloyd Mifflin. SECRETARIES. Foreign Correspondence — Elliott Cresson. Domestic Correspondence — Rev. W. A. M'Dowell, D.D. Recording — Topliff Johnson. MANAGERS. Samuel Jaudon, • James N. Dickson, Richard D. Wood, Lewis R. Ashhurst, William M. Muzzey, Clark Culp, George W. North, Henry S. Spackman, Samuel W. Hallowcll, Rev. John W. James, Rev. J. A. Peabody, John Hockley, Solomon Caldwell, Benjamin Coates, William M. Collins, Samuel Magarge, James A. Porteus, Benjamin D. Johnson, J. Houston Mifflin, Robert B. Davidson, Charles Naylor, W. M. McMain, Rev. Robert Baird, Rev. George W. Bethune. Printed by William S. Martien, No. 0 George street. Cbse At a meeting of the Board op Managers of the Young Men's Colonization Society of Pennsylvania, held November 11th, 1834, the following Resolution, offered by Dr. John Bell, was unanimously and cordially approved, viz: Resolved, That the Board op Managers, in the name of the Society, return their grateful acknowledgments to Job R. Tyson, Esq. for his appropriate and excellent Discourse, delivered before the Young Men's Colonization Society of Pennsylvania, on the 24th of October, 1834, and that a copy of the same, be requested of the Author for publication-. Extract from the Minutes. Toplipp Johnson, Secretary of the Board of Managers. Philadelphia, Dec. 5, 1834. PREFATORY REMARKS. The Author of the following Discourse will regret if it should give pain to any person. or party. He himself belongs to no party whatever. The call which was made upon him, imposed the duty of expressing his opinions fully and fearlessly, and he trusts that he has discharged the obligation in a spirit of temperance and candour. As it is of little moment to others what opinions he may choose to entertain or express, his chief solicitude has been lest the cause might be injured by his lame exposition and imperfect defence. The writer does not intend to become a gladiator in this arena. He hopes, therefore, to be pardoned for saying, that the limits prescribed to an oration, precluded that full array of fact and argument which the topic requires. From this cause, he has left untouched several considerations which he would gladly have introduced, and been prevented from pursuing others which are barely started. Some of these are concisely hinted at in the form of notes. Owing to the necessity of compression on the one hand, and the want of skill on the other, he has, no doubt, been guilty of the fault noticed, after Horace, by Boileau : "J evite d'etre long, et je deviens obscur." DISCOURSE. On this day has sailed from the port of Norfolk, the good ship Ninus, laden with one hundred and twenty-six of the enfranchised sons and daughters of Africa. Like the worthy and persecuted associates of William Penn, these voyagers seek shelter from oppression in a foreign clime. Delivered from the fetters of bondage by the active philanthropy of this association, they seek, in the establishment of a new colony, the enjoyment of freedom. They embark, the first emigrants to the Pennsylvan Colony, on the one hundred and fifty-second anniversary of the arrival of Penn, with the first English settlers, on the shores of the Delaware! With a coincidence so remarkable, an omen so auspicious, may the vessel spread her canvass to benignant winds! Bearing with her the elements of an independent empire, may Heaven penetrate the hearts of her passengers with the magnitude of their enterprise, and illumine their minds to direct it with wisdom ! What friend of humanity will refuse his gratitude and joy, at the rescue of one hundred and twenty-six human beings from the jaws of slavery? Who will not sympathise with those pleasurable and intense emotions, which the event is calculated to excite in the "hearts of its fortunate instru ments ? The reflections which the departure of this band of adven turers must awaken, are peculiar and cheering. In the pos session of present comfort, and joyous with anticipations of unqualified freedom and future plenty, how unlike the condi tion of their unhappy ancestors, borne from the cherished 6 land of their fathers, with the cruel prospect before them of perpetual exile and hopeless servitude! To the mind of sen sibility it is consoling to reflect, that we restore to Africa, as intelligent and free, the posterity of her sons, whom we re ceived as barbarous and enslaved ! It is consoling to reflect, that we send' them not 'empty away,' but carrying the fruits of light and knowledge, and capable of scattering their pre cious seeds upon a soil which has lain neglected and buried, for centuries, in the grossest ignorance and night. Such is the first step which the Young Men's Colonization Society of Pennsylvania have taken in this sphere of bene volent exertion. The origin of the body is but of yesterday; but its active existence has been the means of conferring important benefits upon the parent Institution. It has infused into its veins the inspiriting virtue of youthful blood, with its impulsive energy. As a branch of the chief establish ment at Washington, it will act upon similar views, and aim at similar results. As an association formed in Pennsylvania, guiding and directing the destinies of a colony bearing its honoured name, it will seek the establishment of those cardinal doc trines of government which rendered Penn illustrious, and his province happy; It will imitate the colonial policy of a Founder, conceded to be far-sighted and virtuous. It will infix as corner-stones in the Pennsylvan fabric the princi ples which he inculcated and practised ; the principles of toleration and temperance — of unbroken faith and universal peace. It will aim, in unison with the parent Society, at those practical blessings to the American negro and the native African, which it was the great design of that institution to promote and subserve. The occasion, therefore, is opportune to recall the reasons which suggested the formation of the American Colonization Society, and to take a glance at her leading principles and purposes, as they are understood and acted upon in Penn sylvania. The distinguished honour of proposing a Society, as it was afterwards modelled, for the colonization of the free blacks upon the coast of Africa, belongs to Dr. Finley, of New Jersey. It dates its existence, as an organized company, in the beginning of the year 1817, upwards of thirty years after the formation of the Abolition Society of Pennsylvania, the parent of perhaps all the similar institutions in this coun try. Let us survey the wide field of enterprise which the condition and prospects of the degraded and wretched sons of Africa presented, at that period, to the mind of enlight ened benevolence. The introduction of negro slavery into this country be longs to its provincial history. It must go in reduction of that debt which we owe to our ancestors — it is an incum brance connected with our English inheritance. Thirteen years after the settlement on the James river, a ship load of Africans, from the coast of Guinea, was sold to the planters. Multitudes, in Virginia and the other colonies, were soon after added. New supplies were in a course of constant arrival. At length the influx becoming onerous, and the injustice of the traffic apparent, further importation was prohibited by law. Slaves being thus admitted, and being cherished in the southern latitudes on account of their alleged necessity and great number, the revolution swept by without effecting their emancipation. Legal provision has since been made for the gradual removal of slavery in the states north of the Poto mac, but on the south it continues to exist without a sen sible change. In other countries servitude has no doubt been in practice, more oppressive, being less restrained by benignant legisla- lalion and the moral tone of society. The laws in all the slave-holding states, protect the slave in the enjoyment of those qualified rights which are compatible with its recogni tion, as a legal system. But with these assuasives the sys tem prevails, and is attended with too many revolting ap pendages ever to have the approbation of disinterested and dispassionate men. It is opposed to the genius of our insti tutions, and at war with that principle of human equality which forms at once our political profession and our national boast. It sinks its unhappy victim to the dust, and prevents 8 him from growing to that moral and intellectual stature be fitting the dignity of a sentient being. 'H/tccru, yelp rf'apEtfjJs artowvviat tjpuorfa Zauj, 'Av'zpoi, si)*' av f-i" wt* Si%iov 'J^ap 'EXy'sw.^— Od. 17. 323. Its effects upon the master who lives under it, and upon the country which tolerates it, are only less baleful and ruinous. Look for a moment at the condition of our southern country, where, as well in its moral as its ^physical aspects, can be seen the sweeping desolation of its blight. The vice of indo lence, and those other vices which, march in the train of inac tion, are but too perceptible on every hand. With all the advantages of a favourable position for commerce, a genial climate and luxuriant soil, we find deserted wharves, grass grown streets, and exhausted fallows. Instead of the hardy race which should fix upon solid ground the deep foundations of our republican edifice, we find them luxurious and effemi nate, unequal to those vigorous exertions which a new system in a new country requires.* Those who cannot maintain the style of gentlemen, seek subsistence in other states where labour is honourable and its recompense less contingent. Thus sapped of its strength,, its enterprising spirits banished by an inexorable necessity — its magnificent fields neglected and uncultivated — its inhabitants emasculate by indulgence, " The country blooms a garden and a grave." To change so lamentable a condition of things — to restore man to his civil dignity, if not his native worth — to wrest * Montesquieu attempts to lessen our estimate of the evils of servitude, in despotic countries, by alleging that the condition of a slave is hardly more burdensome than that of a subject. Though his ideas of the African race and of negro slavery, are alike abhorrent and unphilosophical, (See Sp. L. 15 B. 5 chap.) he is nevertheless aware of the inconsistency of slavery with political institutions which aim at, or establish equality. In relation to such govern ments, he says, " slavery is contrary to the spirit of the constitution; it only con tributes to give a power, and luxury to the citizens which they ought not to have." (Sp. L. 15 B. 1 Chap.) Of its effects upon the master, he says, " he contracts all manner of bad habits with his slaves, he accustoms himself in sensibly to the want of all moral virtues, he grows fierce, hasty, severe, volup tuous and cruel."— Sp. L. 15 B. 1. Chap. from destruction those virtues which droop if they be not carefully cherished — were among the original objects of the Abolition Society of Pennsylvania. This institution was composed of men of the first distinction and merit; men who, fired by that liberty which the revolution established, were willing to render that liberty universal. They la boured for the general cause of the African, both bond and free. Though legal emancipation was the primary object of their convention, their comprehensive and benevolent plan embraced in connexion with it, the abolition of the slave trade, and the assistance and elevation of the African race. Schools were formed under competent teachers, and these were watched with the most anxious and unremitted assiduity. The operations of the Society, as a corporate body, were commenced in the year 1789, but it has, in fact, been in energetic agency, since about the year 1785. Nearly half a century has witnessed the devoted zeal of this philanthropic institution. Is it premature or invidious to inquire by what fruits its efforts have been distinguished ? After the lapse of so many years, after the application of intense and persevering labour, if success has neither been realized nor loomed at a distance, is it unfair or unreason able to doubt the final result of the experiment? The abolition of our system of slavery in Pennsylvania was in 1780, a period of nearly five years before the organi zation of the Abolition Society. Is it a derogation from its claim to unquestioned benevolence to deny to it, as a body, any instrumentality in the enactment of the abolition law ? The association was not in being at the period of its passage. The merit of the measure is to be ascribed to the profound sense entertained by the legislature, of the injustice and evils of slavery, incited as they were by Benezet* and other distinguished philanthropists, The statute abolished hereditary servitude, and provided * In the Life of Benezet, page 92, 1 find the following account of his instru mentality in the passage of the act. " During the sitting of the legislature in 1780, a session memorable for the enaction of a law which commenced tho 2 10 for the freedom of the future generation of existing slaves, but those who were then in existence received no benefit from its provisions.* In 1790, which was ten years after the passage of the act, and five after the formation of the Society, there were nearly four thousand slaves in the state. The number has been gradually diminishing, but at the census of 1830, there were in Pennsylvania, sixty-seven slaves, the most of whom will irremediably continue till death, the abso lute property of their masters.t This remnant of legal bondage has remained unimpaired and unaffected by the exertions of the Abolition Society, whose laudable zeal in the maintenance of human rights, must be greatly scandalised by its continuance. In Connecticut and Rhode Island slavery was abolished four years after its inheritable quality was expunged from the code of Pennsylvania, but slaves were permitted to exist, and are now actually in being, by the operation of their statutes. In New Jersey, according to the, census of 1830, there existed, the large numb.er of two thousand two hundred and forty-six slaves. Nor must a fact be omitted in this connexion, that the rapid diminution of slaves at. the north, is not solely to be ascribed to the virtue of unaided statutes, but partly to sales gradual abolition of slavery in Pennsylvania, he had private interviews on the subject, with every member of the government, and no doubt thus "essentially contributed to the adoption of fthat- celebrated measure." — Life of Anthony Benezet by Roberts Vaux. * In the case of Miller v. Dunlling, decided in the year 1826, and reported in the 14th volume of Sergeant and Rawle's Reports, page 442, Judge Tilgh- man was called upon to give a construction to the act of 1780. He decides several interesting points, the first of which is, " That the legislature, anxious as it was to abolish slavery, thought it unjust to violate the right which every owner of a slave had to his service ; and, therefore, every person who, at the lime of passing the act, was a slave, was to remain a slave." t The number of slaves in Pennsylvania, as returned in the census of 1830, is three hundred and eighty-six. I have adopted in the text the number re ported by a select Committee of the Senate of Pennsylvania, who were ap pointed to investigate the cause of the increase since the year 1820, when the number returned was but two hundred and eleven. The Committee exclude from the computation all who were not in being when the abolition act was passed. Vide Journal of the Senate for 1832-3, page 483. 11 made to persons in the slave-holding districts, in anticipation or fraud of the law. Thus many unfortunate men, whose posterity by law would be free, or whose personal servitude would expire at a given period, by being sent beyond the pale of our jurisdiction, became bound by new and infrangi ble fetters. In the adjoining states of Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia, legal servitude survives. If a sentiment has been imbibed in. either, or all of these, unfavourable to its continuance, it is only justice and candour to admit that it has arisen from the efforts of their own philanthropists, and the influence of those internal causes which foreign argu ment or remonstrance could neither prevent nor accelerate. The whole South may be appealed to for the truth of the assertion, that certain measures ascribed there to the Abolition Societies, in exciting estrangement and hostility towards the North, have had the effect of silencing inquiry into the justice or policy of the system. Ill-judging indivi duals have greatly contributed to this alienation and repug nance. Assuming, as a principle, that man could not be legitimately the subject of property, it was thought to be a meritorious act to screen from re-capture, the fugitive who should seek an asylum within our borders. Numerous fugi tives from the southern states have thus been enabled, either by connivance or active assistance, to elude the pursuit of their masters. In vain was it alleged, that the re-delivery of the slave to his legal owner, was a right recognised in the federal Constitution, and protected by express legislative enactment.* In vain was it predicted that such resistance * The 2d Section of the 4th Art. of the Constitution of the United States pro vides, that " no person held to service or labour in one state, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labour, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such labour or service is due." A similar provision in regard to fugitives from justice, immediately precedes this rule in regard to slaves. The learned Du Ponceau, in his " Brief View of the Constitution of the United States," thus expresses his sense of this two-fold provision, page 45 : " Fugitives from justice, and from personal service or labour, are to be delivered up, on being demanded in the manner prescribed by the Constitution and the laws made in pursuance thereof." Accordingly, an 12 to rights, acknowledged by the laws of a sister state, would kindle into a flame those jealousies and suspicions which the accidents of commerce too frequently engender between in dependent and contiguous states. In vain were his abettors reminded of the effects which such interference must inevita bly produce, in tightening the bonds of the slave by all such additional cords as the security of his person at home would render necessary. In vain were they admonished that the retention of a fugitive would prove injurious to the interests of Philadelphia, by the invitation it offered to others to make this city their refuge. In vain were they solemnly adjured, that by exciting indignant feelings at the south, they marred the prospect of legislative emancipation — that by concealing or harbouring a few runaways, sometimes the worst of the class, they forged new manacles for those who remained in bondage. Persuasion and remonstrance too often proved wholly ineffectual ; for what could these effect against a line of conduct prompted by compassion for the slave, and the belief that it was a sacred duty to protect him?* act of Congress was passed on the 12th of February, 1793, entitled, "An act respecting fugitives from justice, and persons escaping from the service of their masters." The object of this enactment was to point out the mode by which fugitive slaves shall be restored to their masters in the states from which they may have escaped. The Abolition Act of Pennsylvania, which became a law upwards of seven years before the adoption of the Constitution of the United States, is very explicit upon the subject of fugitive slaves from other States, although it aimed at the ultimate destruction of our domestic slavery. The 11th section provides, " that the said act, or any thing contained in it, should not give any relief or shelter to any absconding or runaway negro or mulatto slave or servant, who had absented himself, or should absent himself from his or her owner, master, or mistress, residing in any other state or country, but such owner, master, or mistress should have like right and aid to demand, claim, and take away his slave or servant, as he might have had in case the said act had not been made," Jt can hardly create surprise, that the slave holder, smarting under pecuniary loss, should feel little respect for the man whose philanthropy could lead him to violate rights which were thus recog nised by the Constitution of the United States, by act of Congress, and by the local legislation of his own state, * Among the old abolitionists who paid respect to the legal institutions of the country, I may name the late Elisha Tyson, of Baltimore, whose efforts in the cause of abolition were so successful, that he is said to have been instru mental in liberating, during his life, two thousand slaves from bondage ! His 13 1 do not impute to the Society, as a body, the maintenance of such principles nor their reduction into practice. Its vene rable and distinguished President* never would sanction or connive at a course of action so hostile to sound policy, and the dominion of municipal and constitutional law. But whoever may have been instrumental in producing it, the consequence is a decided repugnance at the South to all the acts of Abolition Societies. Their counsels are derided or bitterly laughed at, and their speeches and tracts, being branded as 'incendiary,' are neither listened to nor regarded. Nothing emanating from such a quarter, receives the decency of respect or attention. When the tranquillity of sober re flection is disturbed by objects of excitement, it is easy to adopt extravagant sentiments and to suggest new and plau sible reasons in their defence. It was in this state of the public sensibilities at the South, that the doctrine of state rights was appealed to for the purpose of opposing the en croachments of Northern philanthropists. The cry was heard, that their laws were insulted and their property invaded by men who had nothing to lose by the toleration or extinction of slavery; that a society of another state which had abolished its domestic system, were assailing their own local institu tions. The pride of the South coming to the aid of its pas sions and interest soon extinguished all hope of affecting their intelligent biographer says: "During the whole course of Mr. Tyson's philan thropic exertions, he was strongly characterized for the profound deference which he paid to the laws of the land. * * * Not only because this is one of the conditions upon which every citizen has a right to continue in the communily, but also because the encouraging of disobedience to the laws in one respect, would be the promoting of it in another; disobedience would grow into rebellion, and rebellion end in the total subversion of the state. It was for these reasons that his appeals in behalf of the persecuted Africans were made either to the clemency of individuals, or to the justice of the civil judge. * * * But those cases wherein argument and persuasion were unavailable, he submitted to the legal tribunals of the country; and having placed them there, left them to the future care of those whose oaths bound them to do justice." — Life of Elisha Tyson, p. 13, 14. * William Rawle LL. D., the author of the well known and able work on the Constitution of the United States. 14 system of slavery, except through the agency of bodies formed by themselves, and of measures in which they could personally co-operate. Legislative emancipation, as a phan tom, thus eluded their grasp. Other important objects now claimed their attention. These were the destruction of the slave trade; the protection of the. personal rights of the man of colour; and the exaltation of his'moral and mental being. The department of elevating the negro, a duty of the most pleasing but delicate and arduous nature, must, if properly understood, lead to the most beneficial results. In this pro vince, so peculiarly and justly their own, they have laboured with an ardour which no difficulties could cool, no opposition extinguish. I claim to be an humble advocate of African rights, and a determined enemy to African oppression. I would place them where their personal merits would entitle them to stand, maugre all the baneful prejudices which their distinctive condition has fomented. But do the laws of Pennsylvania deny to them any civil or political privilege ? Do they invidiously point out and distinguish the freeman, because he wears a dark complexion, " The shadow'd livery of the burnish'd sun ?" The freeman of colour is here constituted a free citizen, with all the incidents of absolute denization. But though in possession of all the freedom which laws can confer, and aided by a society who have taught him the use of letters and the obligations of moral and religious duty, he is yet very low in the scale of moral virtue. In elu cidation of this, a reference to the statistics of our prisons and penitentiaries is all that is requisite. In the year 1827, when the white population of Pennsylvania amounted to one million two hundred thousand, and the black only to thirty thousand souls, the criminals confined at the penitentiary at Philadelphia, consisted of one hundred and twenty-one blacks, and one hundred and seventy-three whites. According to the census of 1830, the population of Pennsylvania was one million three hundred and forty- 15 seven thousand six hundred and seventy-two persons, of which number there were thirty-seven thousand nine hun dred and ninety free coloured inhabitants. The number of prisoners in the three penitentiaries of the state, at the end of that year, was five hundred and ninety-eight, of which two hundred and fifty-three were blacks. If the con victions among the white population were in the same pro portion with the black, instead of there being three hun dred and forty-five convicts in the different penitentiaries of the state, an immense and overwhelming multitude, would present of between eight and nine thousand! Nor is there in the magnitude of the crimes committed, a perceptible difference. Among those offences which are supposed to exhibit the highest degree of moral turpitude, such as larceny, robbery, burglary, and arson, the relative proportion of whites and blacks seems to be nearly equal. It has sometimes been argued, in explanation of so lament able a disparity, that the conviction of a coloured man is procured with more facility than that of a white. All expe rience of our criminal courts rejects the imputation as un founded. It affects too deeply the integrity and justice of our judicial tribunals, to be countenanced or discussed with out adequate and particular proof. No ; the fact cannot be reasoned against, explained, or impaired, and however reluc tant we may feel to admit the moral inferiority of the black man in Pennsylvania, the conclusion is altogether irresistible.* Though the statistics of our prisons show the black citizen * Heber tell us that the prisons of Moscow and other places in Russia, were chiefly filled with slaves, most of whom were in irons. The convictions of slaves in the slave-holding states of this union, show the most deplqrable dis proportion to those of the whites. Travellers find the prisons crowded with For the- purpose of contemplating the same men under more favour able circumstances, we must consider them, not in the free state of Penn sylvania, for as I have demonstrated in the text, mere legal freedom confers no exemption from crime, but in Liberia. Governor Mechlin says : " As to the morals of the colonists, (of Liberia) I consider them much better than those of the people of the United States ; that is, you may take an equal number of the inhabitants from any section of the Union, and you will find more drunk- 16 to be more depraved than the white, it must not be forgot ten, that reasons can be assigned for it, without alleging the existence of ingenerate evil beyond the common lot of humanity. All philosophy proves, that man must be incited to virtue and to greatness, by the impulses, of honourable ambition and the hopes of reward. We find men starting from the sinks, of vice and the obscurity of indigence, and winning their way to wealth, honour and distinction, amid a thousand obstacles, and a thousand obstructions. Even the dignity of patrician rank, in England, intrenched as it is behind inveterate customs, and alt the outposts of princely wealth, has been invaded by the daring encroachments of ple beian merit. But however elevated the natural spirit, it will ards, more profane swearers and Sabbath-breakers, &c, than in Liberia. You rarely hear an oath, and as to riots and breaches of the peace, I recollect of but one instance, and that of a trifling nature, that has come under my notice since I assumed the government of the colony." Capt. Sherman says, " There is a greater proportion of moral and religious characters in Monrovia than in this city," (Philadelphia.) Capt. Abels, who spent thirteen days in the settlement, in the early part of 1832, thus attests the moral condition of the colony ; " I saw no intemperance, nor did I hear a profane word uttered by any one. Being a minister of the btospel, on Christmas-day I preached both in the Methodist and Baptist Church, to full and attentive congregations, of from three to four hundred persons in each. I know of no place where the Sabbath appears to be more respected than in Monrovia." The following testimony is borne by Simpson and Moore, who visited the colony together. " We noticed, particularly, the' moral state of things, and during our visit, saw but one man who appeared to be intemperate, and but two who used any pro fane language. We think the settlers more moral, as a people, than the citi zens of the United States." It is to be wished, that we had more recent in formation of the state of the criminal calendar. Capt. Sherman, who was in Liberia in 1830, furnishes the latest news upon this subject. It is, however, all that the most sanguine mind could anticipate. That gentleman says, " To the honour of the emigrants, be it mentioned, that but five of their number have been committed for stealing or misdemeanour, since 1827." During these three years, which produced but five convictions ' for stealing or mis demeanour,' the population of the emigrants averaged one thousand five hun dred souls.' Now, if the moral character of the colonists of Liberia, were not belter than that of the free blacks of Pennsylvania in the year 1830, instead of five convictions, there would have been sextuple that amount; that is to say, if the convictions in Liberia were in the same proportion to the popula tion, as among the free blacks of Pennsylvania, instead of five, there would have been thirty convictions in those three years ! 17 remain tame or torpid without some stirring incentive, some powerful stimulus to action. When intellectual superiority or moral virtue is held in estimation, when its possessor is admired and venerated, we find numerous candidates for the honours attendant upon its acquisition. Why is all this? Because, in the absence of legal impediment, humble merit is sure of success, if it be seconded by the feelings and sympathies of the people. But can the aspirations of the negro in this country be awakened by a similar hope? He feels himself the descendant of a slave, and essentially distinguished from the mass around him. He sees the European foreigner, however differing from us in language and habits, possess every exterior resemblance, and give to his posterity the characteristics of the nation he has adopted. He sees his own offspring but the counterpart of himself, and they likely to transmit their inheritance to their suc cessors from generation to generation. He sees that a re pugnance arising from his ancestry and complexion, pre vents him from enjoying those rights which the laws accord to him. He feels, that though benevolent solicitude for his caste has been alert- for nearly a century, yet the mere privilege of voting — that franchise, without which, liberty- is but an empty name, is denied him at the peril of his life. He feels that social communion with the white man, upon equal terms, is a franchise more difficult to pur chase than that of suffrage to exercise. He feels that the very kindness which he experiences, is a kind of abstract, short-lived sympathy, at a distance, rather than prompted by the admission of undisputed equality, or the desire of nearer ' approach. Thus seeing and thus reasoning, is it surprising that his moral and intellectual nature has not yielded to long- continued and sedulous care ? Promising himself little from the pursuits of industry, or the practice of virtue, save the gratifications of animal existence, and the peace ful consciousness of acting well, he gives up both in despair. In such a state of things it has been suggested, that it is , the part of Christian philanthropy to break down the idle prejudices of lineage and colour by offering tQ 3 18 the coloured man the refinements of society, and to admit him to full participation in the endearments of social in tercourse. Let those who inculcate these doctrines set be fore us the spectacle of their own bright example* Let them, if they can, thus violate all the sanctities of feeling, all the heart felt charities of private life; let them, if they can, upon Christian principles, make the invidious distinction between the negro and his own correspondent class among the whites. An exaltation of the negro above the head of his white com peer, would be unavoidably attended with a twofold impro priety and absurdity. The exclusion of the latter, of equal deserts is indefensible, invidious and unjust, while the ad mission of the former, places him in a station for which he is unfit, and by which he is incapable of deriving advantage. A forced and unnatural union, repugnant alike to reason and to feeling, must ever be the parent of infelicity. But the projectors of amalgamation not having reached that point of moral sublimity which can overlook these various objec tions, it may be considered as a question broached, rather as a metaphysical abstraction, than with the hope, desire, or ex-. pectation of ever seeing it reduced to practice. As the negro, in this country, is from the causes adverted to, curtailed of his moral and mental proportions, it seems rather the dictate of enlightened benevolence to frame plans for his ulterior improvement and practical melioration, than to seek to render him odious by a premature, an indiscreet, and unnatural ele vation. Such being the results of long continued and strenuous ei- forts at abolition, and such the condition and prospects of the free coloured population, it seemed to be desirable, that a new essay should be made, offering more hopeful expectations of success. It was seen that little had been done at the North) and that the great work of Southern Abolition could not be advanced by companies in the free states. It was seen that statutory disability existed to prevent private en* franchisements, unless accompanied by removal from the slave holding territory. It was seen that the free negroes of the United States, stinted and restrained in regard to the finer 19 properties and higher attributes which characterise humanity in positions favourable to its growth and cultivation, were abridged of those common enjoyments which usually fall to the lot of man in a free country. It was under these circum stances, and with these impressions, that the Colonization So ciety grew into being. Though commenced intheNorth,itmet with approbation in the South, and from the era of its estab lishment to the present time, both th.e North and the South have harmoniously united in the projects of an enterprise so transcendently good and glorious. The simple scheme of re moving to Africa all who should consent to emigrate, would, it was honestly believed, promote the ultimate hopes of the Abolition Societies. Let these institutions, by mental and moral culture, prepare the negro for self-government in his father-land. Let them unfold to the free blacks the advan tages which are likely to accrue to themselves, their brethren, and posterity, from erecting free governments in Africa. Let them paint to their imaginations, with pencils glowing with the greatness of the truth, the enjoyments of unrestrain ed liberty and perfect equality, in a region designed by nature, both in its climate and productions, for their exclu sive possession.* Let them awaken their ambition as the * There seems to be a peculiar fitness in placing the negro in Africa, when it is recollected that large portions of its immense tracts are suited only to his constitution. The white man will languish and die beneath a sun which is con genial to the animal nature of the black man. Nature herself, therefore, would seem to concur with this philanthropy, unless it be thought that she designed those regions, which are so well calculated for the residence of the latter, and for him only, to lie waste and uninhabited. Capt. Nicholson, of the U. S. Navy, says of Liberia, which he visited in 1828, " It was, I believe, never intended that the white man should inhabit this region of the globe : at least, we know that the diseases of this climate are more fatal to him than to the man of colour. They luxuriate in the intense heat, while a white man sinks under its exhausting influence." I cannot forbear from quoting, in confirmation of these views, some judicious remarks of a learned writer in a late number of the Phrenological Journal of Edinburgh. " If we look," says he, " to that well marked and vast peninsula called Africa, we find that equally marked race, the negro, with slight modifications, forming its native population throughout all its regions. We- find the temperature of his blood, the chemical action of his skin, the very texture of his wool-like hair, all fitting him for the vertical aun of Africa; and if every surviving African of the present day, who is living 20 founders of a future commonwealth, to be virtuous and en lightened, rich in the ownership of multiplied blessings, and widely diffusive in the effects of example and influence. If they do this, we shall find the American negro, now dwin dled in his morals and intellect, developing those latent capa cities and inborn energies, which, though oppression might check or conceal, it could not uproot and destroy. We shall find him planting a tree in the midst of a howling desert, bearing the rich fruits of religion, civilization, and liberty, and inviting to the covert of its thick spreading branches and clustering foliage, the people of a continent which has lain so long exposed, uncovered, defenceless, and oppressed. The direct and incidental effects of Colonization are very large and expansive. They are not limited to a qualified benefit resulting to the free blacks only, at the expense of injury to the slave, but comprehend in their wide range the cause of abolition, the absolute disenthraling of the man of colour, the extinction of the slave trade, and the civilization of Africa. For the accomplishment of these great purposes, an extensive region of sea-coast has been selected on the western side of the African continent, stretching two hun dred and eighty miles from the river Gallinas on the north, to the territory of Kroo Settra on the south. Being intended for the abode of freemen, this extensive domain bears the appropriate title, Liberia. The actual jurisdiction of the Colony, at present, extends one hundred and fifty miles from Cape Mount to Trade Town. Between these points is beau tifully situated, at Bassa Cove, the locality of the Pennsyl- van Colony. A few leagues beyond the northern limits of in degradation and destitution in other lands, for which he was never intended, were actually restored to the peculiar land of his peculiar race, in independence and comfort, would any man venture to affirm, that Christianity had been lost sight of by all who had in any way contributed to such a consummation? It matters not to brotherly love on which side of the Atlantic the negro is made enlightened, virtuous, and happy, if he is actually so far blessed j but it does matter on which side of the ocean you place him, when there is only one where he will be as happy and respectable as benevolence would wish to see him, and certainly there, a rightly applied morality and religion would sanction his being placed." 21 Liberia, stretches the more ancient settlement of Sierra Leone, and at its southern extremity stands the flourishing little establishment at Cape Palmas. A glance at the map of Africa, discovers a continuous line of sea-coast from the north-west to the south-east of five hundred miles, which is now dotted by prosperous and Christian communities. These are the green spots which the plastic hand of Colonization has formed out of a trackless region of boundless wilderness. The selection made, it is supposed, embraces more advantages of fertility, site, salubrity, and commerce, than any other which the extensive western coast of Africa affords. The first settlement at Liberia was in the year 1822. It now includes about ten thousand citizens who have submitted to regular government. Of these several thousands belong to the native tribes who have voluntarily placed themselves under its protection; many hundred are recaptured Africans; and the remainder are emigrants from this country. Here is the germ of a powerful and independent commonwealth, destined, perhaps, to carry into the heart, and to the remote extremities of Africa, our religion, laws, civilization, and language. The fierceness of opposition, and the easiness of popular credulity, have combined in casting the most cruel aspersions upon the condition and prospects of Liberia. The mistakes of agents and the temporary miscarriage of favourite plans, have been magnified into events of vital and insuperable con sequence. Its existing state has been represented to ad venturers as supremely unhappy, and the country, in point of climate, as a yawning tomb. The least examination will show that these assertions are without adequate basis, and that the colony, both in climate and the prosperous condition of its inhabitants, presents the most flattering inducements to emigrants. — All new countries in a course of improve ment, are liable to the visitation of febrile distempers. The decomposition of that decaying vegetable matter which their falling forests constantly supply, must furnish nutriment to disease. Change of residence from a temperate to a tro pical climate, must likewise impart an injurious influ- 22 ence. In Liberia, these causes concur and are in full operation, without giving rise to greater mortality . than happens in the most salutary districts of our western coun try.'* Better evidence need not be adduced of the salu- *The truth of the declaration in the text, can be well established by cita tions from the reports of the agents of the parent Society, and the, writings of respectable and disinterested visitors. I shall confine myself to a few quota tions. In February, 1828, Dr. Mechlin writes, " This month, although called by those resident here, the sickly season, has not, to judge from the few cases •of illness that have come under my notice, merited that appellation; Indeed, I do not know any part of the United Slates where the proportion of the sick is not fully as great as here, and the cases of a refractory nature are, almost all yielding to medicine." In April, the same gentleman, referring to the newly arrived emigrants, says, "I never saw any fever in the United-States yield more readily to medicine than the country fever, among the emigrants, at this season." In August, he writes, " that only four, or five cases of sickness exist, and that at no time had health been more generally enjoyed." In December, Dr. Randall writes thus : " The climate, during this month, is most delightful. Though this is regarded as the sickly season, we have but little disease, and none of an alarming character.", During- -this period, when, according to Mechlin, only four or five cases of sickness existed, the population of the emi grants was about twelve hundred persons. In the circular Address of the Colo nists to the Free People of Colour of the United States, published about the same time with these testimonies of the physicians of the Colony, we find this candid and intelligent representation of their experience and prospects in regard to health. " We enjoy health, after a few month's residence in the country, as uniformly and in as perfect a degree, as we possessed that blessing in our native country. And a distressing scarcity of provisions, or any of the comforts of life, has for the last twO' years been entirely unknown, even to the poorest persons in this community. - On these points there are, and have been,. much misconception, and some malicious. misrepresentation in the United States. * * * Several out of every ship's company have, within the last four years, been carried off by sickness, caused by the change of climate. And death occa sionally takes a victim from our number, without any regard at all to the time of his residence, in this country. But we never hoped, by leaving Americavto escape the common lot of mortals — the necessity of death, to which the just appointment of heaven consigns us. But we do expect to live as long, and pass this life with as little sickness as yourselves: " The true ¦character of the African climate is not well understood in other countries. Its inhabitants ,are as robust, as healthy, as long-lived, to say the least, as those of any other country. Nothing like an epidemic has ever ap peared in this Colony ; nor can we learn from the natives, that the calamity of a sweeping sickness ever yet visited this part of the continent. But the change from a temperate to a tropical country is a great one — too great not to 23 brity of the climate, than the fact, that the black inhabitants of the Southern states are scarcely sensible of change. They seldom contract the fever to which emigrants from the Northern latitudes are frequently subject. Misgivings of the affect the health, more or less — and, in the case of old people, and very young children, it often causes death. In the early years of the Colony, want of good houses, the great fatigues and dangers of the settlers, their irregular mode of living, and the hardships and discouragements they met with, greatly helped the other causes of sickness. * * But we look back to those times as to a season of trial long past, and nearly forgotten. Our houses and cir cumstances are now comfortable ; and for the last two or three years, not one person in forty, from the middle and southern States, has died from the change of climate." Capt. Nicholson, of the United States Navy, who had visited Liberia on his return from a cruise in the Mediterranean, thus writes to Henry Clay, under date of the 17th March, 1828 : " The population is now twelve hundred, and is healthy and thriving. The children born in the country are fine looking, and I presume can be raised as easily as those of the natives. All the colonists with whom I had any commu nication, (and with nearly the whole I did communicate in person, or by my officers,) expressed their decided wish to remain in their present situation, rather than to return again to the United States." Capt. Sherman, who, in the year 1830, conducted to Liberia fifty-eight emigrants from this country, and who was there for three weeks, in the month of March, thus speaks his honest impressions : " It has been objected that the climate is very unhealthy — this is true as respects the whites, but erroneous as respects the coloured people. Those from the middle and northern States have to undergo what is called a season ing — that is, they generally take the fever the first month of their residence, but it has rarely proved fatal, since accommodations have been prepared for their reception ; those from Georgia, the Carolinas, and the southern parts of Virginia, either escape the fever altogether, or have it very slightly. Deaths occur there, indeed, as in other places, but Doctor Mechlin, the agent, assured me that the bills of mortality would show a less proportion of deaths, than those of Baltimore, Philadelphia, or ffew : York." Simpson and Moore, two intelligent and respectable coloured men, visited the different settlements in the summer of 1832, and report their sense of the health of the country as follows : " Wherever we went, the people appeared to enjoy good health ; and a more healthy looking people, particularly the chil dren, we have not seen in the United States. * * * Our own health, while in the Colony, was perfectly good, although we were much ex posed to the night air." (Vide Dr. Hodgkin's remarks on the value and respec tability of this evidence, in his inquiry into the merits of the American Coloni zation Soeiety, &c. p. 33.) Without multiplying extracts, which, from a variety of sources, and of similar import, might be greatly increased, I will add the 24 climate must be removed by adverting to the sound constitu tions of the native inhabitants. They survive to an age be yond the prescribed limit of ' three score and ten,' and carry with them through life, in strength of limb and rotundity of form, abundant proof of the excellence of their native air. The original emigrants to Liberia were not exempt from those hardships and privations to which first settlers are ne cessarily exposed. Unacquainted with the dispositions of the people, and ignorant of the peculiarities of the soil, their sub sistence was precarious and slender. Care, privation, and disease brought some to a premature grave.* But the diffi- conclusion to which Dr. Hodgkin, the amiable and excellent writer just quoted, came, in the year 1833, after an attentive examination of all the documents connected with the subject. As a foreign writer, and a man of the most bene volent and praiseworthy character, his impressions, derived from a perusal of the whole testimony, are of intrinsic value. He says in his Inquiry, p. 35, " According to the official statements respecting the health of the colonists at Liberia, it does not appear that the mortality, notwithstanding the influx of new settlers — who would have a kind of seasoning to undergo, whatever might have been the situation to which they had removed — has much, if at all, exceeded the mortality in the United States." From these representations, can it be doubted, that when the colonists shall have turned their attention more to agriculture than trade— when the forests shall have been prostrated, the population increased, and its comforts augmented — we shall hear little com plaint against Liberia on the score of climate ? * Sierra Leone, which, notwithstanding the disregard it has experienced of late years, has done so much for the surrounding tribes of barbarians, and towards the destruction of the slave-trade in that part of Africa, showed, in its early history, a mortality alarming in the extreme. If th£ tithe could be rea sonably alleged of Liberia, which is truly related of Sierra Leone, the enterprise would long since have been abandoned. The obstacles which the English Company encountered and subdued, would have appalled and disheartened Americans. Adam Hodgson, in the appendix to his letter to M. Jean Baptiste Say, on the comparative expense of free and slave labour, published in 1823, gives the following melancholy account of the misfortunes to which the first colonists at Sierra Leone were subjected : " This colony (Sierra Leone,) may be said to owe its origin to the liberality and benevolent exertions of the cele brated Granville Sharp. At the time when the decision of Lord Mansfield, in the memorable case of the negro Somerset, had established the axiom, that " as soon as any slave sets his foot on English ground, he becomes free," there were many negroes in London who had been brought over by their mas ters. As a. large proportion of these had no longer owners to support them, nor any parish from which they could claim relief, they fell into great distress, 25 culties which Liberia has encountered, are those only of all colonial settlements. Their early history presents an uniform aspect, one unvarying page ; it is marked by discouragement and disaster, by disappointment and mortality. The parent and nurse of all the Spanish establishments in America, proved a certain burying-place to most of the primitive adventurers. Of the thirty-eight persons left in Hispaniola, by Columbus, as the seed of a colony, all had perished in ten months after, on his return from Spain. The armament which Ovando conducted thither in 1502, carried two thou sand five hundred colonists. One thousand of these fell vic tims to disease. Notwithstanding these sad indications of a fatal temperature, and the mortality which, at the conclusion of the last and beginning of the present century, thinned the ranks of the French and English armies which successively invaded that island, yet all recent voyagers agree, that to the coloured inhabitants, who are now its undisputed possessors, the climate is propitious and healthful. Of the colonists con ducted by Sir Walter Raleigh to the coast, now forming a and resorted in crowds to their patron, Granville Sharp, for support. * * He determined upon sending them to some spot in Africa, the general land of their ancestors, where, when they were once landed under a proper leader, and with proper provisions for a time, and proper implements of husbandry, they might, with but moderate industry, provide for themselves. * * * Nothing could be more discouraging than the calamities which befell the un dertaking from its very outset. Of four hundred black people who left the Thames on the 22d February, 1787, under convoy of His Majesty's sloop of war Nautilus, not more than one hundred and thirty, (who were afterwards reduced to forty,) remained alive at, and in one body, at the end of the rainy season, into which they had been thrown by the death of Mr. Snleathman, notwithstanding Mr. Sharp's strenuous efforts to avoid it. Disaster followed disaster. Famine, disease, discontent, desertion, succeeded each other with frightful rapidity, till the year 1789, when the Colony, again in a state of im provement, was almost annihilated by a hostile attack from a. neighbouring chief." These calamities have long since ceased, and no objection is now heard to the climate of Sierra Leone, in its influence upon the coloured popula tion, and no fears entertained of the natives or of famine. The neglect which it has suffered, has prevented it from realizing all that might be expected from it. It has rendered the colonists happy, and greatly suppressed the slave-trade. 4 26 constituent part of North Carolina, and of others who subse quently followed, not one survived to tell the story of their melancholy fate. The settlement at James Town, in 1607, narrowly escaped a similar miscarriage. One half of the original emigrants were, in a few months, swept away by famine and distemper. Those who remained thrice formed the resolution of abandoning the Colony and returning to England. Of five hundred settlers whom the chivalrous and devoted Smith left in Virginia, but sixty were in being a few months after ; and they, enfeebled by famine, and de jected by various misfortunes, were projecting a speedy de parture from the land of their hardships and sufferings. The Colony at New Plymouth experienced like embarrassments. In six months after the landing of the pilgrims, owing to the unaccustomed rigours of an eastern winter, and the fatigues and hardships inseparable from a new settlement, nearly half of the adventurers had died. A great pestilence, they were informed by the Indian Chief, Samoset, had raged four years before, and swept the populous region of Patuxet. To their other calamities, was added the sterility of a rocky and stub born soil, the productions of which, after untiring and labo rious cultivation, were always uncertain. The distresses of famine threatened them at every step ; they subsisted upon fish, with precarious supplies of corn and beans, procured from the Indians. It is not necessary to remind Pennsyl vania's of the hardships encountered by those worthy pio neers of the wilderness, who landed on the shores of the Delaware, on this day one hundred and fifty-two years ago. It is not necessary to recount the perplexities and trials which their situation imposed — of their disappointment and con sternation in finding caves for their dwelling places, and impenetrable tracts of forests in the promised land. With such examples, and other lights which history sheds, let Liberia be viewed, and it will be seen that less hardship and disaster, les6 mortality and discontent, cannot be found in any settlement which the long narrative of colonial annals records. The concurring testimonies of Captain Stockton and Captain Nicholson, who visited Liberia in 1828 ; of Captain 27 Sherman, in 1830; of Captain Kennedy and Captain Abel, in 1831; of Hannah Kilham, in 1832; and of Captain Voor- hees, towards the close of the past year, establish, beyond the possibility of question, its striking fitness for its destined object. In confirmation of these disinterested and respectable travellers, are the reports of the agents, the letters of the colo nists, and the evidence of British and French naval officers who have occasionally visited the settlement. They unite in repesenting it as the abode of peaceful content and smiling plenty. The preposterous and unfounded statements of one or two unknown or discredited witnesses, are entitled to no respect from the honest inquirer. Like the fabulous stories circulated against colonial Pennsylvania, in the life-time of the Founder, better information and more enlarged expe rience prove their folly and untruth.* * The unknown witness brought forward by James G. Birney, in his re cent letter against Colonization, exceeds, in the monstrosity of its allega tions, the hardihood of all his predecessors. Having never before heard of the Rev. Samuel Jones, thus distinguished in the letter, I know him only by the account there given, that 'he is a coloured man, and had been a slave in Kentucky,' and by his testimony concerning Liberia. I copy the whole de scription, to enable the reader to see how ruthless and fierce are the attacks upon this devoted settlement. " On the fourth day, Mr. King (Agent of the Tennessee Colonization Society,) suggested that we ought now to visit the poor. We accordingly did so, and of all misery and poverty, and all repining that my imagination had ever conceived, it had never reached what my eyes now saw, and my ears heard. Hundreds of poor creatures, squalid, ragged, hungry, without employment — some actually starving to death, and all praying most fervently that they might get home to America once more. Even the emancipated slave craved the boon of returning again to bondage, that he might once more have the pains of hunger satisfied. There are hundreds there who say they would rather come back and be slaves than stay in Liberia. They would sit down and tell us their tale of suffering and of sorrow, with such a. dejected and wo-begone aspect, that it would almost break bur hearts. They would weep as they would talk of their sorrows here, and their joys in America — and we mingled our tears freely with theirs. This part of the po pulation included, as near as we could judge, two-thirds of the inhabitants of Monrovia." Two-thirds of the inhabitants discontented, and hundreds rather be slaves than remain in Liberia ! Hundreds hungry, and some actually starving to death .' Misery beyond what the imagination can conceive, the eyes ever saw, or the ears heard ! The surprise is not that a spurious bill may get into circulation, but that it should find such an indorser as James G. Bir- 28 Such is the country in which the Colonization Society has invited the black man of America to fix his permanent habi tation. It offers him, ' without money and without price/ a ney. This account is opposed by the letter of the Colonists themselves, and the concurring testimonies of the most respectable travellers, from the year 1828 to the present time. The letter from the colonists represents the face of the country as covered with perpetual verdure, and that the soil in fertility is not surpassed on the face of the earth — that the colonists are blessed with plenty, and enjoy content — that wages are high, and mechanics of nearly every trade are sure of constant and profitable employment.' They say-, " Truly we have a goodly heritage ; and if there is any thing lacking in the character or con dition of the people of this Colony, it never can be charged to the account of the country : it must be the fruit of our own mismanagement, or slothfulness or vices." (See the Circular of the Colonists, in extenso, in Thirteenth Annual Report of the American Society for colonizing the free people of colour of the United States, p. 30, et seq.) Capt. Nicholson thus writes in 1828 : " I cannot give you better evidence of the prosperity of the Colony, than by mentioning that eight of my crew (coloured mechanics,) after going on shore two several days, applied for, and received their discharge, in order to remain as perma nent settlers. These men had been absent from their country upwards of three years, and had, among them, nearly two thousand dollars in clothes and money. Had they not been thoroughly convineed that their happiness and prosperity would be better promoted by remaining among their free brethren in Liberia, they would not have determined on so momentous a step as quit ting the United States, perhaps forever, where they all had left friends and relatives. "The appearance of all the colonists, those of Monrovia, as well as those of Cald well, indicated more than contentment. Their manners were those of freemen, who experienced the blessings of liberty, and appreciated the boon. Many (of them had, by trade, accumulated a competency, if the possession Of from three to five thousand dollars may be called so." Capt. Sherman, whose visit was in the year 1830, thus writes of the comfort and contentment of the settlers : " Monrovia, at present, consists of about ninety dwelling houses and stores, two houses for public worship, and a court house. Many of the dwellings are handsome and convenient, and all of them comfortable. The plot of the town is cleared more than a mile square, elevated about seventy feet above the level of the sea, and contains seven hundred inhabitants. " The township of Caldwell is about seven miles from Monrovia, on St. Paul's river, and contains a population of five hundred and sixty agricultu ralists. The soil is exceedingly fertile, the situation pleasant, and the people satisfied and happy. The emigrants carried out by me, and from whom I re ceived a pleasing and satisfactory account of that part of the country, are located here." Capt. Kennedy's visit was in 1831. He thus states the result of his inquirios and observations : " I sought out the most shrewd and intelligent of the colo- 29 home of freedom and plenty in the land of his fathers. It offers him a sanctuary from wrong and persecution. It offers him the unwonted prospect of an unclouded and bril- nists, many of whom were personally known to me, and by long and many conversations, endeavoured to elicit from them any dissatisfaction with their condition, (if such existed,) or any latent design to return to their native country. Neither of these did I observe. On the contrary, I thought I could perceive that they considered that they had started into a new existence ; that, disen- cumbered of the mortifying relations in which they formerly stood in society, they felt themselves proud in their attitude," &c. &c. Fifteenth Report, 1832. Capt. Abel gives this emphatic testimony. He was in the Colony in the latter part of December, 1831. " Ml my expectations in regard to the aspect of things, the health, harmony, order, contentment, industry, and general pros perity of the settlers, was more than realized. There are about two hundred buildings in the town of Monrovia, extending along the Cape Montserado, not far from a mile and a quarter. Most of these are good substantial houses and stores, the first story of many of them being of stone; and some of them hand some, spacious, and with Venitian blinds. Nothing struck me as more re markable than the great superiority in intelligence, manners, conversation, dress, and general appearance in every respect over their coloured brethren in America. So much was I pleased with what I saw, that I observed to the peo ple, ' Should I make a true report, it would hardly be credited in the United States.' Among all that I conversed with, I did not find a discontented per son, or hear one express a desire to return to America. I saw no intemperance, nor did I hear a profane word uttered by any one. Being a minister of the Gospel, on Christmas day I preached," &c. The pious Hannah Kilham, who visited Liberia in 1832, said nothing of the want, misery, and discontent de scribed by Jones. Can there be a doubt, that if either existed, she would not have seen and mentioned it ? Dr. Hodgkin states, that she left England by no means prepossessed in favour of Liberia. She speaks of the moral con dition and comforts enjoyed by many of the colonists, and of the respectful and cheerful attention paid by the pupils in the girls' school at Caldwell, to the teacher, whose union of gentleness and firmness, she extols. Not a word in confirmation of Jones. Simpson and Moore, two respectable coloured men, one of whom is a clergy man, visited the Colony, at the request of their free coloured brethren of Natches, likewise in the year 1832. The following is the evidence they fur nished : " As a body, the people of Liberia, we think, owing to their circum stances, have risen in their style of living, and their happiness, as a community, is far above those of their coloured brethren, even the most prosperous of them, that we have seen in the United States. They feel that they have a home. They have no fear of the white or the coloured man. They have no superiors. They do not look up to others, but they are looked up to by them. Their laws grow out of themselves, and are their own. They truly sit under their own 30 liant future. But in presenting the invitation, its duty is performed, and it goes no further. It disavows all constraint or compulsion, for these would imply an authority which no where exists, and is no where pretended. It professes itself the friend of the coloured man, because he is degraded by our lawsy and sometimes, as in Pennsylvania, in despite Of legal regulations. It desires to take him from a country where he must languish in inferiority, and where he never vine and fig-tree, having none to molest and make them afraid. Since our return, we have been in the houses of some of the most respectable men of colour in New York and Philadelphia, but have seen none, on the whole, so well furnished as many of the houses of Monrovia. The floors are, in many cases, well carpeted, and all things about these dwellings appear neat, conve nient, and comfortable. There are five schools, two of which we visited, and were much pleased with the teachers and the improvement of the children. * * * We found only two persons who expressed any dissatisfaction; and we' have had much reason to doubt whether they had any good cause for it." Capt. Voorhees, of the United States Navy, arrived at anchorage in the bay of Montserado on the 9th of December, 1833. He dates his report to the Secre tary of the Navy at that Cape, on the 14th. He says, " Piracy has not afflicted this quarter for some time ; and the inhabitants at the settlements living in undisturbed peace and tranquillity, seem to entertain very encouraging confi dence in their future security." After speaking of the kindjof people who should be sent to Liberia, he says, " Such persons of colour here, in the land of their ancestors, find a home and a country, and here only, do they find them selves redeemed, regenerated, and disenthralled." An intelligent old man, about sixty years of age, with whom I conversed, stated that he had been here about eighteen months, and was getting on cleverly for himself and his family, " but that on no account would he return to the United States." The last witness to whom it is necessary to refer, in contradiction of the Rev. Samuel Jones, is a coloured man, who bears the name simply of Joseph Jones. He was sent out hy the Kentucky Colonization Society, for the purpose of ex amining " fully the situation of the Colony of Liberia." The Board of Managers of the Kentucky Society speak of him " as a man of excellent cha racter, of a clear and vigorous understanding, and possessed of those qualities which make a man useful to society." He reached Liberia on the 11th of July, 1833, and remained in the Colony nine months and twenty-nine days. His testimony, therefore, relates to Liberia, as it was about the middle of the year 1834. To the question put to him during his examination, " Do the colo nists appear satisfied 7" his reply is, " I was particular in my inquiries, and I found the large majority well satisfied, and would not return to this country if they could." The Editor of the Western Luminary, who had a conver sation with Jones, says, under date of 30th July, 1834. " He represented the people as being generally contented, and apparently happy." 31 can be happy, to a land capable of bestowing upon himself and his posterity, the blessings of happiness and liberty forever. One of the inseparable incidents, and unavoidable effects of Colonization, is to induce the emancipation of slaves. It has already given freedom to above one thousand human beings. The number is small, only because the ability of the institution has been restricted. In 1830, the owners of upwards of six hundred slaves offered them for manumission, for the pur pose of being conveyed to Liberia. The Society of Friends of North Carolina manumitted several hundred slaves, whose liberation had been denied by the legislature for a period of fifty years, to enable them to enjoy freedom in the African Colony. Benevolent individuals, who feel a kind of paternal solicitude for the future -welfare of those servile dependents, entreat the Society to take them for the same munificent purpose. The noble-minded liberality of M'Donough, of Louisiana, who asked for legislative permission to educate his servants, with a view to ultimate enfranchisement in the land of their ancestors, must be vivid in the public recollec tion. But the evidences of a desire on the part of South ern masters to manumit their slaves, if a proper asylum can be procured for their reception, are too numerous and pub lic to require elucidation. Suffice it, that if the funds of the institution were augmented a hundred fold, and the capa bilities of the Colony were commensurately increased, they would all be put in requisition by the extended and increas ing eagerness manifested at the South for voluntary emanci pations. Ten thousand slaves would at this moment be re leased from thraldom, if they could be transported from the country. It is upon these grounds that colonization addresses itself to the benevolent wishes and active support of the friends of abolition. Here is a mode in which experience has taught us that abolition can be effected. But it is ob jected that the process is slow; that the condition of expat riation is hard and cruel ; that liberations by private indi viduals may have the effect of retarding legislative action ; and that, as it may prove but a temporary assuasive, it will allure the attention of the South from the efficient remedy. 32 Must it then become a question upon which benevolence can hesitate, whether slavery in America is preferable to freedom in Africa? But a slight consideration of the objec tions shows, that they are captious, untenable, and erroneous. If Colonization decoy the inflamed South from the contem plation of measures pursued by the ill-judging North, its re sults must be permanently salutary. It restores that mental equilibrium which, on a question affecting private property, is essential to the exercise of a just and enlightened discre tion. Whatever may be the plea for interfering with pecu niary interest, and however upright and disinterested the motive, any attempt to impair it, must unavoidably awaken feeling and bring about resistance. Allay this hostility by abstaining from harsh imputations and unkindly acts, and half the obstructions to abolition are removed. But why will voluntary emancipations, or the removal of free blacks and manumitted slaves, delay the period of legislative action? By what means, and through what agency, is legislative action effected ? Is it not by that silent process by which private sentiment is influenced ? The slave-holder who nobly resigns that property which was legally his own, has new feelings and sensibilities. He no longer retains an interest in the continuance of slavery as a system. His sentiments are opposed to it. They become as expansive as is the extent of his influence. Some adopt his reasoning, and imitate his example. These become the centre of other circles, which grow wider and more numerous, till at length they diffuse themselves into a dense and undistinguished mass. In proportion as the work of private emancipation advances, the cause of public abolition is hastened. With each case of voluntary liberation secured, the seed is sown for a future and larger harvest of freemen. When, by these means, pri vate sentiment shall have been roused to the natural injustice, the republican inconsistency, and political evils of servitude, we may indulge a well-grounded hope, that its legal extinc tion is at hand. Is it not then a work to which benevolent men and benevolent legislatures ought to contribute ? If the South agree to part with their slaves, can the North do less 33 than incur the expense of providing them with a suitable abode? Is it a proof of philanthropy and patriotism which our Southern brethren can admit as conclusive, that the North should inveigh against servitude without assisting to effect its abolition? If slavery be a national evil, as citizens they should participate in the pecuniary burdens which its de struction imposes. With the adoption of such sentiments and corresponding generosity in contribution, the whole South might be drained of its slaves before the actual cessa tion of servitude in those Northern States, which vaunt so loudly of ' equal liberty and equal rights.' But the aims of Colonization are not limited to -the extinc tion of bondage in America, but it pursues to Africa with vigilant solicitude the objects of its sympathies and care. It proposes to render them not only free, but intelligent and happy. It offers for their acceptance a fertile and luxuriant country, requiring only the hand of industry and labour to render it the garden spot of the tropics. It offers to the un informed emigrant the prospect of education by means of schools and libraries, and to the man of serious and higher contemplations, the advantages of congregational devotion. It may safely be asserted, that history presents no example of a Colony under better auspices — none with so many solid reasons for the anticipation of success, and so few to justify the apprehension of failure or miscarriage. Colonization, in the wide circle of its benefits, has been but partially displayed. It includes not merely abolition, and the restoration of the African to that liberty of which he and his progenitors have been deprived for ages ; but taking a survey of consequential advantages, it seeks the annihilation of the slave-trade, and the civilization of Jlfrica. With out yielding to that ardour of enthusiasm which a scheme so grand and comprehensive is calculated to inspire, let us, in the sober spirit of philosophical inquiry, calmly look at the probabilities of its promised achievements. The detestable traffic, called the slave-trade, extensively prevails in defiance of the laws and treaties made for its sup pression. From the acts passed by the Colonial Assembly 5 34 of Virginia, commencing in 1699, down to the period when the Congress at Vienna, solemnly engaged for its cessation in Europe, a series of prohibitory laws were enacted, and man}^ strenuous exertions made, to bring it to a practical ter mination. All signally failed. Laws and treaties, and navies to compel their execution, were alike ineffectual. In 1816, a period subsequent to the abolition of the traffic in Great Britain and the United States ; subsequent to the meeting at Vienna, arid the interdict of Napoleon ; the slaves annually taken from the coast of Africa, were computed at 60,000. In 1817 the coast was crowded with slave-ships, and the trade prevailed to such an extent, as to supersede and render abor tive all attempts at ordinary commerce. According to the report of a Committee of Congress, made in the year 1821, the annual average number of slaves withdrawn from Wes tern Africa should be estimated from 50,000 to 80,000. ' The importations into Rio de Janeiro, between the years 1820 and 1829, continued annually to increase from 15,000, to upwards of 43,000. This sickening picture might be height ened by the most revolting details, and presented with those additional horrors, which a description of the Middle Pas sage would bestow. But it is enough. It shows that the attempts to terminate the most diabolical traffic which ever afflicted and disgraced humanity — the edicts of states, the treaties of confederate powers — each uniting in the denuncia tion of it as piracy, and the punishment of it by death — have all been inoperative and powerless. If these be inade quate, it may be deridingly asked, can the plan of Coloniza tion succeed ? Does it exhibit claims to attention, of which such imposing endeavours are deprived? Let us from naked facts coolly consider the present results, and deduce the cer tain tendencies of the scheme, and we shall at least compre hend the mode by which it is proposed to accomplish a pur pose so good and stupendous. ' Cape Messurado, the very spot selected for the residence of the first colonists, and the site of the flourishing town of Monrovia, was a place for the purchase and embarkation of slaves. Before the commencement of the colony, from 4000 35 to 5000 wretched victims of foreign cupidity; were annually exported from the harbour. According to Ashmiln, in the year 1823, between this place and Cape Mount, a distance of fifty miles, now constituting perhaps the most thickly inha bited portion of the settlement, at least 2000 persons were shipped for the hopelessness of exile and slavery in a foreign land. In 1825, the same lamented writer declares, that from Cape Mount to Trade Town, a distance of one hundred and fifty miles^ and embracing the whole region formerly infested, no slaver dared attempt the guilty traffic. The slaxefactories are now entirely broken up. The Chiefs of the country adja cent to Grand Bassa, which is within the line of coast between Cape Mount and Trade Town, stipulated in the year 1829, to cease from the slave trade, and to suppress it within their territorial limits. The recaptured Africans who belong to the colony, are among the living trophies of its victories. The great numbers which have been recaptured at Sierra Leone, and the advantage of these convenient stations on the coast, form powerful incitements to further activity and bra very, on the part of naval commanders. In addition to these evidences of an influence exerted by the colony upon the African slave-trade, might be adduced the increasing com merce of the colonists with the interior tribes; the progres sive improvement of these by means of their intercourse with the settlers; and the growing sentiment of aversion towards the traffic among those tribes, which were formerly distinguished for ferocity and barbarism. The concurring opinions of respectable visitors, and the agents of the Parent Society, represent facts, of this nature, too strongly and cogently, even to be resisted or seriously impunged. Such are the prospects, and such have been the effects of this sim ple enterprise, in the destruction of a trade upon which states men and philanthropists, from a remote period in the annals of Christian Europe, have expended their united energies with so little success. Inseparably connected with the destruction of the slave- trade, or greatly dependant upon it, is the impression to be made upon the mind of Africa. Oppressed with the unbro- 36 ken .sleep of ages, she may not be at once awakened from her stupor— amused with her dreams of ignorance and super stition, she may reluctantly exchange her delusion, for the broad effulgence of life, the great purposes, the unimagined realities of being. The reign of darjkness and night may for a time be permitted in the vicinity of light and day. , " Is't night's predominance, or the day's shame, That darkness does the face of earth entomb, When living light should kiss it ?" But the genius which has given immortality to ancient Egypt —which nurtured young science in her cradle— - which sent her forth to Greece, and finally to Europe — may break through the clouds and dissipate the mists which have so long over shadowed and obscured it. With the return of her sons from exile, blest with the glimmering rays of that light which first broke forth and dawned in their, own land, she will pursue those steps which led to former ascendency, she will reassert her former dominion, crowned with new conquests, and more dazzling glory. "States fall, arts fade, but Nature doth not die." We may look forward to a period when the hand of labour will lessen the vast ocean of her forests ; when extended com merce in procuring wealth, will bring its concomitant conve niences ; and when a luxurious taste will spread about and around, her the refinements of elegance. We may expect a time when the obelisk will mark the spot which has been known for centuries as the residence of fierce and untamed barbarity; and when the institutions of liberty and happiness which we now. enjoy, the greatest and the purest which mankind ever saw, shall be those of a country, the clanking of whose chains, and the loudness of whose laments have penetrated to the remotest corners of the earth. We may anticipate the coming of that glorious day, when the objectless idolatry and blind superstitions of paganism shall 37 be supplanted over the land by the sublime spirit, and pure precepts of Christianity. It is in these connexions, that the colonization of Africa presents to the mind the most cheer ing and ennobling contemplations; It proposes not only to elevate humanity in the scale of freedom, happiness, and vir tue, but it promises to enlarge the limits of the scientific world, and to extend the wide boundaries of Christendom. Humble as is the present condition of the Colony of Libe ria, it is big with its ultimate destination. Its effects are not seen alone in the quickened impulses and more generous aspirations of its inhabitants. The chiefs and kings of the neighbouring country seek- the protection and friendship of an ally whose motives they cannot distrust, and whose ability they cannot question. They see the fruits of superior intel ligence and a better religion, in the plenty, comfort and peace of the settlers. Constant intercourse must beget an improved taste, and the sense of inferiority must transfuse an ambition to remove the cause. That impulsion which Eu rope received in the middle ages, and which led to the melio ration of her own savage manners, arose from her relations with Asia, by means of her pilgrims to the Holy Land. The contemplation of a superior society, and of those refinements engendered by the arts, introduced new ideas of order — com parisons were instituted — emulation was excited — manners grew less fierce and unrestrained. - The proximity of higher cultivation, must, by inevitable transmission, produce the most favourable effects. Look at the present condition of our western country. Originally settled by a race of men, but one remove from the native savage, it presented the desolation of a moral and mental waste. As the rolling tide of emigration approached, carrying with it elements of a • superior order, the waste was nourished as if by the neigh bouring breeze; it was cultivated, and became a garden. Look through the history of man from the earliest age of which tradition speaks — trace the causes of his advance from wildness to refinement — and they will be found to be the collisions of commerce, or the influences of colonial settle ment. History, however, has taught us the lesson, that when 38 colonies are prompted by the love of conquest or plunder, or when nature has interposed impassible barriers to a free com munion, that perpetual war, or servitude, or massacre, is the dire conclusion. Memorable instances of each occur; but it may suffice to refer to that single case which, presents a striking illustration. The colonization of America has been the means of destroying, not civilizing the ancient inhabi tants. The thirst of wealth, of which the presence of these unfortunate beings retarded the gratification, or those physi cal differences which nature herself had implanted, as if forever to distinguish between the invaders and the invaded, formed sufficient impediments to social union. Who can doubt that such would be the consequence to Africa of permanent communities, formed within her borders by the inhabitants of Europe ? Who can doubt that a mere inversion of the existing relation between Africa and Ame rica, would be thence produced? Who can doubt that re maining perpetually, distinct, except in anomalous cases, supremacy on the one side, and subserviency on the other, or constant and bloody conflict, would be the hapless result? But experience has shown that the union of the American negro with the native African, is harmonious and productive of mutual advantage. So far has this union advanced, that intermarriages have already occurred between the female emigrants and the re-captured natives. This must introduce greater alacrity, on the part of the natives, to adopt the cus toms and habits of the emigrants ; — a closer reciprocity of interest, a constant interchange of kindly offices. It is by leagues of alliance, both political and domestic, that there must spring up a kindred sympathy, an identity of feeling, which will unite the two people and render them inseparable. Each emigrant may, therefore, be more than a missionary. He may be as a fertilizing stream in an arid country, dis pensing greenness and beauty along its sterile banks. Let these streams multiply from ten thousand sources; let them be fed by generous tributaries from America and Europe ; and like another^ but greater and richer Nile, in their concen trated mass, the vast and mighty sheet overflowing the 39 continent, will convert its hideous and lifeless deserts into a smiling scene of animation and verdure. A great moral oasis will take the place of diffusive barrenness, in tracts known only as the haunts of prowling animals, and " Of savage men more murd'rous still than they." It is such aims and purposes which animate the friends of Colonization to press forward, in despite of the accumulated impediments which oppose their advance. Unfounded pre judices are raised, which must, by generating a spirit adverse to the coloured man on the one hand, and arraying the North against the South on the other, bring about incalcula ble evils.* As the country should be guarded from the approach of an inimical army, so it should be warned against the insidious attempts of foreign stratagem to undermine its allegiance. What so plausible and insinuating as the deceit ful guise of Christian benevolence? What so likely to sum mon to its aid the religious sensibilities of a foreign country, and the conscientious and unsuspecting of ours? When we find an official functionary of Sierra Leone publishing a report intended to affect the American Colony at Liberia ; when we find Englishmen denouncing as absurd a project * Mrs. Childs cautions us against the adoption of Colonization principles on the score of their unpopularity. The unfounded reports industriously circulated against the scheme, have excited much prejudice against it in the minds1 of many worthy persons belonging to our free black population. This, too, may be said, that preaching at the North against Southern slavery can be easily done, as it costs nothing but the writing and publication of the sermons. Color nization, on the other hand, requires constant pecuniary sacrifices to convey to, and maintain the objects of its care in Liberia. It is for this reason not so cheap a philanthropy as some others. As it requires money in its sup port, the Southern states may naturally, believe, that Northern people would not engage in it without pure and disinterested motives, either of patriotism or benevolence. Touching the argument of James G. Birney, derived from the successive dissolution of several Colonization Societies in the South west, that the plan contains no permanent animating principle, I may refer to the Abolition Society of Maryland, which was dissolved in the year 1798, having existed only seven years. The Protection Society of that state, formed for similar purposes," by Elisha Tyson, some years after, met with a, similar fate. The same may be said of most of the benevolent projects of the age. 40 which they themselves originated and still continue to pa tronise; when we find our glorious Constitution the object of absurd, butcensorious and ruthless attack; when we find two British agents in the Eastern and Northern country railing at institutions over which their auditors have neither jurisdic tion nor control; can we doubt of the existence of a well defined object, a settled and systematic design? It seems manifest, that the Anti-slavery Societies, from their princi ples, connexions and acts, are of foreign parentage — that their formation was dictated by English party politicians, with the view, by making a direct assault upon the constitu tional union of the United States, to compass their objects at home. It is not necessary to, deduce the history of our intercourse from the earliest times, with the great people from whom we are descended, to perceive in the movements of one of her political parties, a constant distrust, an unvarying watch fulness of her offspring. But all nations now attest the rapid approximation of what has long been foreseen and antici pated, that this republic united, would rival and at length supplant England, in her maritime and manufacturing ascen dency. No panting after superior greatness could outrun the certain but quick advances of her youthful and more vigor ous competitor. That which she could not obtain by the direct agency of energetic. exertion, she might realize by the indirection of diplomatic subtlety: If the glory of that rising country could be prevented by distraction of councils — divi sion among its members — separation of its union, — all the brighthopes of its youthful promise, all the dread fears of its opening career, would, in a moment, be dissipated and dis pelled. The cloven foot of this policy was discovered soon after the commencement of our government. It has been equal- lyperceptible in the controversies growing out of the tariff* * The English apprehended much detriment to their manufacturing interests from the passage of our tariff acts. We all remember the clamour of a party in England against them. One or two Englishman greatly contributed by their writings, to inflame the people of South Carolina against these laws, and thus prepared them for the admission of the famous nullification doctrines. It was one 41 But patriotic ardour has defeated it all. The delicate ques tion of negro emancipation, not springing from temporary causes, nor likely to subside with temporary interests, held out its alluring but deceptive promises. It would be well for reflecting Americans to examine the causes of that popular tumultuary eruption which led to the sudden formation of societies in dereliction of the ancient and recognised principles of gmdual emancipation — principles announced in the Charters of our Abolition Societies, and in accordance with the uniform tenor of our abolition acts.* of these writers who dared to calculate the value of the union to South Carolina. — It should not be omitted, however, that other manufacturing nations abroad are not less jealous of the progress of American industry. It is said, and there is sufficient reason to believe, that in the year 1832, when a Bill was before Congress " for promoting the growth and manufacture of Silk," which had been reported and strongly recommended by the Committee on Agriculture, and which appeared to have the assent of a majority of the House of Represen tatives, the minister of France openly declared himself opposed to the bill, and it is probable, considering the great interests then and now in suspense between the two nations, that his opposition did not a little contribute to its rejection, af ter it had passed in committee of the whole. *The charter of " The Pennsylvania Society for promoting the Abolition of Slavery," &c. enacted into a law on the 8th of December, 1789, has these words for its first section : " Whereas « voluntary Society has for some time subsisted in this State, by the name and title of ' The Pennsylvania Society for promoting the Abolition of Slavery, and the relief of free negroes unlawfully held in bondage,' which has evidently co-operated with the views of the legisla ture, expressed in the act of the General Assembly of this Commonwealth, passed the first day of March, in the year of our Lord 1780, entitled ' An act for the GRADUAL abolition of slavery,1 and a supplement thereto, passed the 29th day of March, in the year of our Lord 1 788." It thus appears by the Charter of this Society — the fundamental law of the body corporate, without which it could not have a legal existence — that its views were confined to gradual abolition. — The Biennial Conventions of the various Abolition Socie ties in the Union have repeatedly sanctioned the principle of gradual emancipa tion. The Convention which met at Washington, Dec. 8, 1829, express their belief that abolition " can only be obtained by very gradual means," that laws fixing a future period for the freedom of slaves had met the approbation of form er Conventions ; that the idea of immediate freedom had encountered universal reprobation ; and that "gradual abolition is the only mode which at present ap pears likely to receive the public sanction." See minutes of the 21st Biennial American Convention, pp. 27, 8, 9. — All of our abolition acts proceed upon the principle of gradual emancipation. Pennsylvania set the example in 1780. Connecticut followed in 1784. Rhode Island a little later the same year. New 6 42 It would be well for Americans to pause before they adopt, at the suggestion of foreigners, a philanthropy which incites to turbulent invective and acrimonious clamour, against an honest and well intended benevolence. They should examine York in 1799, and New Jersey in 1804. These acts all adopt the principle of gradual and prospective abolition. — The other non-slave-holding states in which legal slavery has been adjudged to be incompatible with their Constitu tions, have always had very fein or no slaves. I allude to Maine, Massa chusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont, in the latter of which states only, in the year 1790, there were slaves. In that year, Vermont had seventeen slaves. Slavery was prohibited in Ohio, Indiana and Illinois, before these communities were admitted to the rank of states, by the celebrated compact of 1787, for the cession of the North Western Territory to the Federal Govern ment. Whether the prohibition, which, in aceordanee with the Compact and Ordinance of Congress, was afterwards introduced into the Constitutions of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, has been expunged in either, I have not been able to ascertain; but certain it is, in Illinois, slaves are returned in 1810 and 1820, and according to the census of 1830, there exist 746 slaves in the state. Suffi cient, however, has been said, to show that gradual emancipation has been the characteristic feature of all the legislation in this country. This sentiment is not affected by the judicial construction which has been put upon the Constitu tions of several of the states in which there were few or no slaves whatever, especially as judges ate governed by their own abstract notions of what the law is. In Pennsylvania, the Constitution contains a similar article to that which, in Massachusetts, had been judicially pronounced inconsistent with slavery, and yet the seven judges composing the then High Court of Errors and Appeals, solemnly determined, "that it was their unanimous opinion slavery was not inconsistent with any clause of the Constitution of Pennsylvania." With regard to the policy of the immediate or gradual abolition of slavery at the South, that is not the question in this place ; but I may be pardoned for quot ing the concurring sentiment of Anthony Benezet and Dr. Fothergill, upon this subject, as the latter contributed so largely to the passage of our abolition act. In a letter to Dr. Fothergill, under date of 4th month 28th, 1773, Benezet writes : "Z am like-minded with thee, with respect to the danger and difficulty which would attend a sudden manumission of those negroes now in the Southern colonies, as well to themselves as to the whites." Again -. — The danger of immediate abolition in places where slaves constitute a large part of the population, as in the Southern country, is distinctly admitted by Jonathan Edwards, (an unwilling witness,) in an appendix to a sermon which he pro nounced at New Haven, in 1791. He had contended in his sermon, upon general principles, for the necessity of immediate abolition j upon the doctrine being impugned as dangerous, he thus distinguishes between the Northern and Southern states. " As' it respects the Northern, in which slaves are so few, there is not the least foundation to imagine, that they would combine or make insurrection against the government ; or that they would attempt to murder their masters." * * * " With regard to tho Southern states, the case is different. The negroes in some parts of those 43 the long list of Colonization advocates, and see whether the first statesmen, jurists, and citizens of this country, are capa ble of the detestable hypocrisy of aiming, through its means, at the perpetuation of servitude. They should coolly investi gate the immediate bearings and remote results of Colonization. They should dispassionately compare the declarations of its enemies with the certainty of its present performances, and the probabilities of its future influence.* states are a great majority of the whole, and therefore the evils objected would, in case of a general manumission at once, be more likely to take place." Since 1773 and 1791, when Benezet and Edwards respectively wrote, the slaves at the south have greatly increased in number; and as a consequence, the " dan ger and difficulty," as expressed by one, and the " evils ofihroat-cuttin