;;i^t3'l;::^t:|:Sii;:^iM;; - - - ¦ . ¦ ".-¦.-- ¦..-; agisted SCOT OF CUPAR'S APOLOGETICAL NARRATION. FORBES OF ALFORD'S RECORDS CONCERNING THE CHURCH. AN APOLOGETICAL NARRATION OF THE STATE AND GOVERNMENT OF THE KIRK OF SCOTLAND SINCE THE REFORMATION: BY WILLIAM SCOT, MINISTER OF CUPAR. CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE ESTATE OF THE KIRK IN THE YEARS M.DC.V. & M.DC.VI. BY JOHN FORBES, MINISTER OF ALFORD. EDINBUEGH: PEINTED FOB THE WODEOW SOCIETY. MDCCCXLVI. PREFACE. The two Works contained in the present volume, although they are how printed for the first time, appear to have been extensively- circulated in manuscript, and they are often quoted as works of authority by learned Presbyterian writers. The Council of the Wodrow Society, having resolved upon their publication, and the gentleman to whom the task of editing had been devolved finding himself unable to undertake it within the limited time, I was re quested to superintend the volume through the press, in co-opera tion with the Eev. James Anderson, who had undertaken the more laborious part of transcribing and collating the Manuscripts, as well as of correcting the proof-sheets. As neither of the Works is of a nature to require minute illus tration, our chief object has been to present an accurate text, by a comparison of what were considered to be the most accurate or authentic copies. I. SCOT'S APOLOGETICAL NAEEATION. This work presents a brief but comprehensive view of the affairs of the Kirk from the Eeformation in 1560, till the meeting of Parlia- VI PREFACE. ment after the arrival of Charles the First in Scotland in 1633. Thus it embraces a period of Ecclesiastical History which has been much more fully detailed and illustrated by Calderwood and later writers. The personal share however which the Author had in many of the later transactions recorded in his work, gives it a degree of value which it might not otherwise have possessed. Petrie, in the latter part of his History of the Catholick Church, printed at the Hague, in 1662, (part iii. p. 371,) made consider able use of it. He quotes it under the title of " The Historical Narration of the Government of the Church, which (he says) is com mon now in writ, and said to have been penned by William Scot, the eminent minister of Couper." In the subjoined note I have endeavoured to claim for him, after an interval of two centuries, the authorship of a well-known work which was published ano nymously in the year 1622, under the following title : — " The Course of Conformit-ie," As it Hath proceeded, Is concluded, Should be refused. Psalm, xciv. 20. Shall the throne of iniquitie Jtave fellowship with me, which frameth mischief by a law ? Printed in the year 1622, 4to.* * After the above title, " The Preface to the Reader" fills 8 leaves, and the table of " The Course of Conformitic," other 3 leaves. The tract itself, which ends on page 1G8, assumes the form of a dialoguo between an aged minister, Epaphras, and a yonng minister, Archippus ; and includes copies of various Protestations and other documents, as well as a Treatise on the new Office of Bishops, divided into 13 chapters (pp. 20-48.) It has hitherto been ascribed to David Calder wood ; but I am inclined to assign tho authorship of it to William Scot : — 1. From the manner in which he repeatedly refers to it in his Apologetical Narration ; 2. The preface. vii The text of Scot's Apologetical Narration is given from a manuscript in the possession of Dr. James Keith, Fellow of the Eoyal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh ; and the best thanks of the Society are due to that gentleman for the very liberal man ner in which he afforded the use of it to the Council. It is a small folio, written in a neat and legible hand of the time of the author, and extends to 282 pages. Two more recent manuscripts in the Library of the Faculty of Advocates have also been used. The one is a 4to volume of 351 pages, (marked Wodrow MSS. 4to vol. xv.,) written about the end of the 17th century, and has been carefully collated.* The other is a folio, pp. 238, (marked 34 : 2 : 11,) and corresponds eo closely with Wodrow's MS., as to render it not improbable that it was transcribed from it. On a fly-leaf, it has the name of " Al. Dunlop," who was Professor of Greek in the University of Glasgow, and it is supposed to have improbability that Calderwood, who at this time was an exile in Holland, and was engaged in various other works, could readily have compiled it ; and, 3, That in a copy in my possession, there is written, in a contemporary hand, " By M. W. S." the initials of Scot's name. In corroboration of this, I find that Johnston of Warriston, in some MS. collections which I possess, under the title of the " Third Part of Testi monies," refers to " the Course of Conformitie," page 73, " wherein worthy Mr Wil liam Scot, and Mr Henderson, and others, spake their mynd freely and fully." This reference may suggest an obvious inference, that Scot himself appears as Epaphras, and Henderson, who had not been more than six or seven years in the ministry, as Archippus. It is also more than probable that the manuscript, having been sent to Calderwood in Holland, where it evidently was printed, he may have written " The Preface to the Reader," in which he speaks of it as being " from a ready mind and a good will," and characterizes the " two honest Epitomists" in a manner which the Author himself would probably not have done. * Among the Harleian MSS., No. 4621, is a copy of Scot's Narrative, in " small folo of 211 pages, closely written in -a small hand." (Catal. vol. iii. p. 180.) This, I pre sume, was the copy to which Wodrow refers in the passage quoted in a note to page xxvii., as having belonged to James Anderson, author of the " Diplomata Scotia;," from whom Harley, Earl of Oxford, obtained several of the Harleian MSS. now in the British Museum. A similar copy was purchased, along with Professor Matthew Crawford's Manuscripts, by the General Assembly, in the year 1736. Vlll PREFACE. belonged to the Hon. James Erskine of Grange, Lord Justice- Clerk, from 1710 to 1734, but who survived till 1754. The Apologetical Narration is presented to the Members of the Wodrow Society without claiming to be regarded as a work of any great historical importance, but as one that is worthy of preservation by such a Society, were it merely to serve as a literary memorial of a man who was so highly and justly respect ed, during a long life, and in times of no ordinary difficulty, for his uniform zeal and fidelity in his ministerial labours, and who joined extensive learning with singular modesty and soundness of judgment. II. FOEBES'S CEETATNE EECOEDS. This work is of a much more limited nature than Scof s Narra tion ; but it may be deemed of greater importance, from its exhi biting, in full detail, by one of the leading sufferers, the whole iniquitous proceedings against those Ministers who were present at the meeting of the General Assembly which had been ap pointed to be held at Aberdeen in July 1605. The MS. from which the text was prepared for press is in the Advocates Library, (marked 34 : 5 : 8,) and bears the following title : — " The Eeformation of Eeligion in Scotland, containing the Beginning, Progress, and Establishing of the Trueth, both in Doc trine and Discipline, within the same. Ex Authoris Autographo." But this title does not properly describe the work. It is a 4to, pp. 209, and on the first leaf is written, in a legible hand, " Ex PREFACE. IX chartaceis Mri. Hugonis Craig, 1690, A. D. C. S." It forms part of a collection, in four volumes, lettered on the back " Kirk MSS." A., B., C, and D. ; and having belonged to the Hon. John Swinton of Swinton, one of the Lords of Session, from 1782 to 1799, it is in the present volume quoted as " Swinton's MS." A literal tran script of this MS., made about the beginning of the last century, is in the possession of the Eev. Thomas M'Crie, Edinburgh. It however appears that Forbes had subsequently revised his work, and made very considerable additions to it, giving it the title of " Certaine Eecords touching the Estate of the Church," &c. It was therefore necessary that the additional chapters or passages should be incorporated with the original work; but all these additions are pointed out in the foot-notes. Two copies of this enlarged manuscript are preserved in the Advocates Library. One of these, written in a legible hand of the reign of Charles I., is a small 4to, pp.' 301, (marked 32 : 4 : 5,) and, having the name of a former possessor, " Ex libris Johannis Gibson, Dec. 22. 1704," it is, for the sake of dis tinction, quoted as " Gibson's MS." The other is a large 4to, pp. 126, (marked " Wodrow MSS. 4to, vol. xiii.,") and is an accurate transcript of that MS. made about the year 1700. Among the Biographical Collections by the Eev. Eobert Wodrow, deposited in the Library of the University of Glasgow, are copious Lives both of Scot and Forbes. Many years have now elapsed since I had an opportunity of examining and taking notes from these Collections ; but the hasty manner in which all these Lives were compiled by the indefatigable Author, and the preface. extent of the two specially referred to, rendered it altogether unadvisable to apply for permission to have them transcribed and added to the present volume. Inde'ed the materials of Scot's Life consist almost wholly of extracts from Calderwood's larger History, which is now in the hands of the Members of the Wodrow Society ; and those of Forbes exhibit little else than a series of extracts from Forbes's own work, which forms the latter part of this volume. To satisfy however the Eeader's curiesity, Mr Anderson, having recently examined Wodrow's Collections at Glasgow, for that purpose, has condensed in the following pages the whole information contained in these unpublished Lives, with such additions and corrections as the researches of later times have supplied. DAVID LATNG. signet library, 10 July 1846. NOTICE OF THE LIFE OP MR WILLIAM SCOT. William Scot, the author of the " Apologetical Narration of the State of the Kirk of Scotland," was a man of high character and of very considerable influence in his day ; but our knowledge of his personal history is, in a great measure, limited to a few facts connected with his public life. As to his parentage, birth and education, Wodrow had not succeeded in obtaining any informa tion. " It's not improbable," he says, " he was a native of Fife, educat at St. Andrews under Mr Andrew Melville, who had the pleasure to see many of his scholars useful and eminent in the Church." * It appears however, from the statement respecting his age at the time of his death, f that he was born in the year 1558, and derived his origin from the Scots of Balwearie, a family of great antiquity in Fife. But his father, Eobert Scot, seems to have been a younger son, and to have died about the beginning of 1605. This we learn from the Eetours of Service ; Mr William Scot, minister of the Word of God in the Church of Cupar, having been served heir of his father, Eobert Scot in Mylne-dean, in the third part of the lands of the northern portion of Pitblado, 3d April 16054 * Wodrow's Life of Scot, MS. t See his Funeral Inscription, at page xxx. t Betours, Fife, No. 150. Xll LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. Being intended for the ministry, William Scot received a learned education at St Andrews, having matriculated or entered St Salvator's College in 1582 ; and in 1585 he took his Master's degree. * It has not been ascertained at what time he was ad mitted to the ministry ; but his name occurs as minister of Ken- noway, in Fife, in the proceedings of the General Assembly in 1595 ; f and he was translated from thence to Cupar, in the county of Fife, in 1602, where he continued to labour till his death, for the long period of forty years. % It may be noticed that Wodrow, in his life of Scot, falls into a mistake in supposing that he was minister of Cupar so early as 1596. Professing to derive his information from Calderwood, he says, " I find him minister there, May 1596, when, as we have seen in Mr James Melville's, and Mr John Davidson's Lives, the Synod of Fife met at Dunfermline, for renewing the nation's, and their own ministerial covenant with the Lord. It would seem, (he adds,) Mr Scot had been Moderator of the former Synod, and now he preaches at the opening of that meeting ; and Mr Calderwood says it was an excellent discourse." Calderwood, how ever, does not say that Scot was minister at Cupar in 1596; but that he was minister there at the time when he wrote his history. His words are, " Mr William Scot, presently minister at Cupar, made a notable exhortation." § Scot was minister of Kennoway in 1596. How long he had held this charge previous to that year is un certain. " But we may guess from his being Moderator of that Synod, which by this time was as much planted as any Synod in the Church, and at this time and afterwards were eminent for their firm and zealous appearances for truth, and against corruptions of all kinds, that he was ordained to the ministry some years before, * A note of these dates was obligingly communicated to Mr Laing by Principal Lee ; who adds that Scot appears with his fellow student Adam Colt, as paupcrcs (or minxts- potentes,) that is, persons who paid the lowest fees. t Tho Booko of the Universall Kirk, vol. iii. p. 836. | Selections from the Minutes of the Synod of Fife, printed by the Bannatyne Club pp. 219-230. § Calderwood's History, vol. v. p. 433. LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. xiii it not being ordinary to make ministers Moderators of Synods till they had been some time in the ministry." * In the year 1602, the General Assembly which met at Holy- roodhouse in November, having appointed ministers to reside for some months in the families of the Popish Lords, " by whose labours in the meantyme . . . the said noblemen and thair families may be confirmit in the trueth, and the enemies therof debarrit from thair companies," Scot was fixed upon for the Earl of Huntly's family, and also put on the Committee for draw ing up instructions and directions to the ministers thus appointed, t Huntly was then the leading man among the Popish nobility, and distinguished for his activity and zeal in supporting and encourag ing Popery in the North. It was, therefore, a proof of the high estimation in which Scot was held by his brethren, when they selected him for so delicate and difficult a situation. We again find him Moderator of the Synod of Fife held at St Andrews in September 1604 ; for, at the opening of the next meet ing of that Synod at Burntisland in April 1605, he " taught powerfully against the corruptions entered in our Kirk." $ Scot cordially sympathised with the ministers who were impri soned and prosecuted for holding a General Assembly at Aberdeen in 1605, and took an active part in the exertions made to obtain their liberty. With this view, he and other Commissioners from the Presbyteries of Fife, appeared before the Privy Council upon the 14th of November, with a petition in their behalf, § which, being refused, and the Council having desired the Commissioners to * Wodrow's Life of Scot, MS. t The Booke of the Universall Kirk, p. 984. Wodrow, ignorant of the fact that Scot was first rninister at Kennoway, in speaking of this appointment says, " Indeed, in Calderwood's MS., this Mr Scot is termed minister at Kennoway, and may be an other minister of the same name. But I suppose it was the same whose life I am upon ; hut, being uncertain, I say no further on this." He afterwards supposes Kennoway to be a mistake for Cupar. J Calderwood's History, vol. vi. p. 276. § Two ministers belonging to the same Presbytery with Scot having been sent to attend the Assembly at Aberdeen, were among the imprisoned, and were afterwards banished, namely, Mr John Sharpe, minister of Kilmany, and Mr Alexander Strachan, minister of Creich. XIV LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. apply directly to the King, Scot drew up a petition praying for their restoration to liberty. In various other ways he testified his deep interest and Christian sympathy in their sufferings. In May 1606, letters were sent from the King to eight of the most eminent ministers of the Scottish Church, of which number Scot was one, requiring them to come to the Court before the 15th of September ensuing, the professed object being to treat with them in matters respecting the peace of the Church, but the real object of which was to enable the King to carry forward his mea sures for the establishment of Episcopacy in Scotland with the more success. Fourteen of the most zealous of the ministers being now shut up in prisons, were deprived of the power of resisting these measures ; and to lessen the resistance still more, these eight ministers, — including the Melvilles, the master spirits of the Church of Scotland, — being those whose opposition was chiefly dreaded, were called up to Court, to remove them from the scene of action, where their opposition would have been most powerful and successful. Scotj before he.took ship with Andrew and James Mel ville for London, on the 15th of August, received the following letter, which Wodrow supposes to be from one of the ministers imprisoned in Blackness, although it is not subscribed, nor bears the name of the place from which it was written. * It is addressed ' thus : " To the Eight Honourable Mr William Scot, Minister of Cupar, deliver this," and is as followes : — " Eight Honourable, " After my hearty salutations, I am wo that I should not see you before your journey. This miserable situation of ours has promised and beguiled me. But, seeing it is so, in God's provi- * This letter Wodrow has inserted in his Life of Scot ; and he thinks it probable that it was written by Mr Forbes or Mr Welsh. " But," says he, " it does not look so like Mr Welsh's hand, several of whose original letters I have." The original is among the Wodrow MSS. vol. xlii. folio, no. 49 ; but neither does it appear to resem ble the handwriting of Forbes, one of whose autograph letters we have seen. From internal evidence there can be no doubt that it was written by some one of the minis ters imprisoned for holding the Aberdeen Assembly ; and we may hazard the conjec ture that it was written by John Sharpe of Kilmany. LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. XV dence, I shall remember you as God shall give me. We all thought to have conferred with you or some of the rest, but we know the cause, and we are dear to you ; and, seeing the cause of Christ is als dear to you as to us, we need not speak of it. The news we have are, that our brethren are to be layed first with fair words and some deeds, for every one shall have 500d merks, when ye come there ; and if that cannot prevail, next boasting. But I hope the Lord shall be with you. They say you are to be dealt with to condescend to thir three things : 1. To the King's supre macy ; next, to the Bishop's directions ; and, thirdly, to allow of our conviction. This last Thursday there was a supplication given in to the Council upon this occasion, because several of our flocks who are in ward be infected with the pest ; as Ayr, and the hail brethren's flocks almost that are in Ness. The President was friendly, for he read it before and mended some things, and caused write it over. Marr and Elphinstoun and Fleeming assisted it. It was concluded it should be sent in the first packet. Mar has promised. Dumbar came not in till Friday. He was dealt with. It was said that of new he had gotten full commission anent us ; but he denies. He has promised to do meikle ; but I look not that ever God shall favour him with sic a good turn. I cannot express my grief that I have not seen you. The Lord give us a blessed meeting, and direct you and the rest in this dangerous time, that ye may kythe faithful and zealous of his honour. As for us, we are contented to stand with this cause of Christ, and ready to fall with it. My cousin of Glasgow * wrote to me the last day, and I to him. He has promised meikle. He is an courtiour. Ye may confer with him as ye have occasion. I am wo that he should be that other way. I have not will to trouble you, so many otherways I know vexed ; but I pray the Lord to direct and guide you, and give us an happy meeting. Ye will leave two lines if ye have any purpose. The grace of God be with you ! Your own. " The 9th of August 1606. " The Brethren commend themselves to you." * Probably Patrick Sharpe, Principal of the College of Glasgow. XVI LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. Scot and his brethren reached London in due time, and were admitted to a conference with the King on the 22d of September, when " the King made an eloquent speech, tending to this or the like purpose, showing, that whereas he had left the Church of Scotland in great peace at his departure, being now desirous to have the same continued, he had sent for them to know of the particular disturb ances thereof, which lately had therein arisen, and to hear their advice and counsel how the same might be composed and mitigat ; showing also, how happy this Church of England was established under the government of Bishops. In end, he grew to two parti culars, to wit, lmo, To demand what they thought of that conven ticle (for so continually he called it) at Aberdeen ; and whether they would condemn the same or not. 2do, What overtures they would give for a peaceable and ordinar Assembly to be kept." * Another conference between the King and the eight ministers took place on the 23d of September, when they were again examined as to the lawfulness of the Assembly held at Aberdeen. On this occasion, after several of his brethren had delivered their sentiments on this subject, " his Majesty's Attorney, Sir Thomas Hamilton, began to presse Mr William Scot touching the said point, to whom he answered so gravely and learnedly, using both termes of law, logick and theologie, that he had the great applause of the nobilitie of England, the King's Advocate, seeing the said Mr William to answer so discreetly." t On Monday, the 29th of September, they were again examined before the Council of Scot land on the same subject, and also in reference to their praying for the imprisoned Ministers. The Council, " after they had asked their mind again of every one in particular touching that Assem- 1 bly at Aberdeen, put the deponer in a corner, lest, returning, he might signifie to the subsequent what he had confessed ; in which * A Report of the Conferences betwixt his Majesty and the Ministers of Scotland holden at Hampton Court, 22d September 1606, in Wodrow MSS. vol. xlii. folio no. 49. This paper contains some particulars concerning this conference which are not in Calderwood's History ; and, on this account, we have quoted more largely from it than we would otherwise have done. flbid. LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. XVII trial God so ruled all their hearts and mouths, that (although none of them heard what another had confessed, yet) all of them agreed joyntly in one harmonic The said day they demanded them also, if they had prayed for the prisoners, and what was the particular form thereof, who confessed that all of them had prayed, but the particular form they could not remember, seeing many of them used not a set forme. Alwayes at that time some of them rehearsed the particular words so neere as they could remember, and subscribed the same with their hands. Others desired a time to call the same to minde Thereafter, they were called before the Council to give in the particular forme of their prayer subscribed by their hands ; at which time also, they, who the night before extempore had done the same, gave in the parti cular forme of their prayers as more advisedly thought upon." * They were also required by the Council to return, each for him self, written answers to three written articles which were delivered to them ; the first referring to their praying for the imprisoned Ministers ; the second, to the King's power to call and prorogue General Assemblies ; and the third, to his power over all per sons and in all causes, civil or ecclesiastical. The answers of Scot to these questions substantially agreed with those of his brethren, and are expressed with much modesty and courtesy ; but he takes due care not to acknowledge the high pretensions of. royal prerogative, which it was the object of these questions to assert, t Two methods were adopted by the King to convert Scot and his associates to the measures of the Court for the subversion of Presbytery and the establishment of Prelacy on its ruins. First, some of the most learned Doctors of the English Church were employed to deliver discourses before them in confutation of Pres bytery and in defence of Prelacy; the Scottish Ministers being seated directly before the pulpit, that they might the more dis- " A Report of the Conferences between his Majesty and the Ministers of Scotland, &c. Wodrow MSS. vol. xlii. folio. t See his Answers at pp. 173-175 of his Apologetical Narration. b XVlil LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. tinctly hear, and be the more deeply impressed by the orations of these learned preachers. The following is the account given of this singular piece, of king's craft in a paper which we have more than once quoted : " The Dean of Westminster sent to Mr John Gor don, Dean of Salisburrie, to desire them to be at sermon to-morrow following, the 21st of September. After their riding to Church a seat was prepared for them hard by the pulpit, where Dr Barlo [Barlow], Bishop of Eochester, made the sermon on Acts xx. 28, ' Attendite vobis, et toti gregi in quo constituit vos Spiritus Sanctus episcopos ;' which words he urged for Bishops, Archbishops, &c, their jurisdiction and superioritie over the other ministrie, much abusing Fathers, perverting Scripture and delivering many points of Popish doctrines. . . On Tuesday, 23d September, in the morning, they were warned by the said Mr Alexander Hay to be at sermon again; who, when they had come to the King's Chappel were placed hard by the pulpit to heare Dr Bucrage [Buckridge] on Eom. xiii. 1, ' Omnis anima potestati- bus superioribus subjeeto esto,' fyc, touching the King's Supremacie ; who altho he delt not so naughtily as the former, yet still wyned Pope and Presbyterie together as enemies to King's supremacie. The Sabbath following they were charged to come to his Majestie's Chappell, to hear Dr Andrews, Bishop of West minster, * opening up Numbers [x. 1, 2,] ; in which he compared their Presbyteries to the conspiracie of Corah, Dathan and Abiram. On the morrow, being Tuesday, the 30th September, the sermon being begun by Dr King, and they missed from the Chappel, were sent for with all expedition, who comeing heard him." t This sermon was in the same style as the preceding. " Dr King," says Calderwood, " made a most virulent invective against the Presbyteries, crying to the King, ' Doun, doun with them ' !" % But the elaborate discourses of these learned Doctors were entirely thrown away upon those for whose immediate benefit * Dr Lancelot Andrewes was successively Bishop of Ely, Chichester and Winchester. t A Report of the Conferences, &c. | Calderwood's History, vol. vi. p. 582. LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. XIX they were intended, who, so far from being convinced, offered to answer the Sermons ; which James prudently would not permit, well knowing that his English Bishops had very imperfectly studied this controversy. These four Sermons having been printed, Scot was one of those appointed by his brethren to prepare an answer to them ; but which never appeared. * This method of conversion failing of success, another was adopted. The Ministers were to be placed in the houses of some Dean or Doctor of note, whose private influence might be brought to bear upon them. " The 23d of November Alexander Hay was sent to them from his Majesty with this ambassage : That whereas his Majesty had sent for them to heare their counsell and advice in pacifying matters, and that they had not satisfied his Majesty, but some of them had shewed themselves inobedient to his Majesty's command, therefore he thought good to send them to the school of obedience." t (Then follow the names of the Ministers and of the Doctors with whom they were to be lodged.) No more, how ever, was heard of this till about three months after, when this charge was renewed ; which led the Ministers to present a suppli cation to the Council of England, complaining of such a mode of treatment, and praying to be allowed to return home. The sup plication having been delivered to Bancroft, Archbishop of Canter bury, to be answered, he sent for two of their number to come and speak with him. Scot and James Melville went to his house at Lambeth, where his Grace received them with all the affability of a courtier. After conversing on the order of the Council requiring each of the ministers to take up his residence with some Dean or Bishop, and on the desirableness of a union between the Churches of England and Scotland, the Archbishop observed that the only difference between the two Churches consisted in forms of government and some ceremonies, and that, since they came from Scotland, he understood their Church was almost brouo-ht to one with the English Church in that also, Constant * Melville's Diary, Wodrow Society edition, p. 678. t A Report of the Conferences, &c. 62 XX LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. Moderators having been appointed in their General Assemblies, Synods and Presbyteries. Such a communication could only inflict a deep wound on the heart of the Ministers, who regarded this as a step to the over throw of that system of Church government which was dearer to them than life, because they believed it to be the only form of Church government which Christ had appointed in his Word. Accordingly, Scot, who could not remain silent when this tender point, which awakened all the sensibilities^ of his soul, was touched upon, " beganne a wise and solid conference and discourse, saying and laying sic groundis as mycht beir up a suir and graive worke ; and making mentioun of our dewtie to Chryst and a guid con science." But to speak of " dewtie to Chryst and a guid conscience," as involved in the defence of Presbytery, must have appeared ridiculous to the Archbishop, or, in his own elegant phrase, a sample of " the gaggle and noise of the puritanical geese and dogs." The man could not think or feel otherwise who regarded the zealous Presbyterians as he did Knox, the founder of Presbyterianism in Scotland, as " men altogether carried away with a mad fury," and " as chief authors of all the domestic unquietness and sedition that of a long time, through the malice of Satan, hath been within the bowels of our commonwealth;'' and, accordingly, with a smile of apparent courtesy, but which, in reality, must have proceeded from, or concealed contempt, he interrupted Scot, and with affected condescension and familiarity, tapping him on the shoulder, said, " Tush, man ! here, take a cup of good sack!" And so, filling the cup, and holding the napkin in his own hand, he made them drink. * We shall only farther remark of Scot while at London, " that by his prudence and wisdom, as well as his good address, he was very useful to all the rest of his brethren there ; and such was his gravity and respectful carriage there, that some of the English nobility when they saw the hard treatment the Ministers met with, * Melville's Diary, p. 700 ; Miscellany of the Wodrow Society, p. 491. LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. XXI offered Mr Scot great welcome and encouragement if he would stay with them in their families." * In May 1607, Scot was allowed to return to Scotland, and to his own flock, provided he sent to Court a testimonial of his good behaviour from the Archbishop of St Andrews ; and failing this, he was required to return to London before the 15th of July. Whether Gladstanes was disposed to give Scot a testimonial of good behaviour, or to allow him to remain at home, except from considerations of mere policy, may be easily inferred from the fol lowing extract from a letter which he addressed to the King, dated St Andrews, July the 20th 1607 : "I received from your Majesty a direction anent Mr William Scot minister at Cupar, that the Bishop of Dunkeld, the Lord Scoon and I, should report to your Majesty whither his presence here might be beneficial! to the peace of the Kirk and your Highness service, that therupon your Majesty might prorogat his license of abiding here upon our good report. Sir, if I had been put in trust alone, I would have been bold to have returned my service ; for I protest I stand in awe of none bot God and the King. My Lord of Dunkeld is sick and bedfast, and my Lord Scoon is there. I presume, in their absence, most humbly, upon my knees, to beg of your Majesty, that since Mr Scot is come thither, he may have of your Majesty proroga tion of his remaining here, till some reasonable day, that may give some occasion to us to explore his disposition and usage, in such sort, as we may give, upon good grounds, an sufficient ground to your Highnes, which may move your Majesty to continou him or remove him. Thus for the present it may please your Highnes to give him a supersedere in write, with such confyning as your Highnes thinks meet for an untried man." f The only thing which could be laid to Scot's charge, was his opposition to prelacy, and for this he must be confined, and, if the Archbishop should judge fit, doomed to exile from his native country. Gladstanes clearly * Wodrow's Life of Scot, MS. t Life of Archbishop Gladstanes in Wodrow's Biographical Collections, printed by the Maitland Club, vol. i. pp. 250, 251. XX11 LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. considered him as belonging to " the auld Melvinian bruide ;" an appellation which he applied to the more public spirited of the Ministers, whose opposition to the plans of the Court and the Estate of the Bishops gave him too much trouble, and whom therefore he desired to be kept under due restraint. * Had it not been for a scheme devised by the Bishops, professedly to restore harmony to the Church, but in reality to lull asleep and divide the ministers, who continued stedfast to the Presbyterian dis cipline and government, Scot might have been kept longer in England. This scheme was that of Privy Conferences, at which some on the side of each of the parties, which then divided the Church, were appointed to meet before his Majesty or his Majes ty's Commissioner, to reason and conclude about ecclesiastical affairs, and to devise, if possible, some middle ground on which both parties might unite. Scot and some of his brethren, from its being intended to place them on these Conferences, were allowed to remain at home ; and accordingly, in the General Assembly held at Linlithgow in July 1608, twenty being appointed, ten on each side, for holding a con ference of the nature we have described, Scot was nominated one of the number. He attended the Conference which took place at Falkland in May 1609 ; but he soon found that all his own and his friends efforts and reasonings at such meetings, how ever zealous and powerful, did little good in arresting the pro gress of defection. " I doubt not," says he in a letter to James Melville, dated September the 16th 1609, " most loving father, * As an indication of Gladstanes's disposition towards these Ministers, we shall only quote one instance taken from his " Memoirs to the King," in which he says, " The Dyocesian Synode of Fyfe and remanent kirks of my Diocie, betwixt Tay and Forth, hath bene holden heir in your Majestie's citie, quhair thair was some opposition maid in the beginning be Mr Jhone Malcolme and some of the auld Melvinian bruide that remains heir ; but I repressed them by authoritie and reason, to the great content ment of all your Majestie's gude and faithful subjects that were present in great nom- ber, swa that thereafter I keiped that Assemblie with great peace and obedience and reverence to me, so restis onlie the Synode of my Dyocie be-south Forth, which I have indicted- in Haddingtoun upon the first day of November." Wodrow MSS. vol. lxix. folio no. 13, p. 18. The Synod here referred to was probably that which was held at St Andrews in 161 1. See Calderwood's History, vol. vii, p. 157. LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. XX111 but if ye would censure us as we deserve in thir things, yee might verie justlie esteeme us to be voide of all sound affectioun, that sould be Christians, obliged as we are unto you and to our father, south by. . . I beseeke you, but ceremonies, (most dear unto me,) lett us understand with this trustie bearer your minde parti- cularlie, and wherein we may be more steadable ; for we have need to be advised and spurred ; we read and we scroll, but the veritie is wounded, and we make no support." To which Melville replies, " My deere and most loving sonne, you would be censured and spurred ; but what I sould censure I see not weill, and to spurre a running hors I can not, and yet it is true, there is great need of both to us all." He then proceeds to comment on the Conference at Falkland, the crafty design of its appointment, and the dark prospects of the Church. * Scot, however, though chosen a member of this Conference, was considered by the Court and the Bishops too dangerous a man to be allowed to attend the judicatories of the Church, as appears from his Apologetical Narration, (p. 206) ; and from a minute of the Provincial Synod of Fife, held at St Andrews, May the 6th, 1614, to the following effect : — " That humble supplicatione be maid to the King's Majestie, for directing the Secreitt Counsell to gif ane license to Mrs William Eow, Jhone Carmichael, William Scot, William Watson and John Scrymegeour, to repair to thair ordinar ecclesiastick judgementis, and releiving thame from their confyning." f This restraint, however, was ultimately removed. In the Assembly held at Aberdeen, August 1616, Scot, with some others, J were appointed to prepare and publish answers to " some pamphletts and books full of calumnies, quyetlie sett foorth, and spred within this countrey be the Papists, and enemies of the true religioun, ... to the effect, that therby the geiple may be instructit how to beware of the samein, and the * Calderwood's History, vol. viii. pp. 48, 49. t Selections from the Minutes of the Synod of Fife, printed for the Abbotsford Club, p. 78. J The others were Mr William Struthers, Minister at Edinburgh, Patrick Forbes, Laird of Corse, and William Cowper, Bishop of Galloway. XXIV LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. said errours and calumnies may be refutit." * But we are not aware that either he, or any of the rest to whom this task was in trusted, ever published any thing directly in answer to Popish writers. Their attention was probably withdrawn from the Popish controversy in consequence of the debates arising from the enact ment and imposition of the Perth Articles, which then began to agitate the country. To these Articles Scot was decidedly opposed. He was a mem ber of the Assembly at Perth, 1618, at which they were enacted, and distinguished himself by the ability with which he reasoned against them, both in the Privy Conference and in the open As sembly. In the Privy Conference, four were named to dispute the article of kneeling at the receiving of the Lord's Supper, Dr Henry Philip and Dr William Forbes for the one side, and Mr William Scot and Mr John Carmichael for the other. Lord Binning, f in a letter to the King, dated " Santjohnston, the 27th August, at night," [probably 1618,] giving an account of the Con ference, says, " Master William Scot of Couper, being command ed to speak, opponed agains the article [of kneeling] with modes- tie and protestation, that he would be unwilling to adduce reasons to impugne ane proposition cumming from your Majestie ; and thairefter proceiding to his argumentis, was secunded be Mr John Carmichell, with more vehemencie and wilfullness. They alledg- ed, that the ordour presently observed in this countrie being agreable to the Word, and Chrystes institution, and they sworne at thair admission to the ministrie to observe the true religion and discipline ressaved in this Church, they could not, with saif conscience, alter it. Which being answered, they came to the substance of the question anent the maner of resaiving, and spent the rest of that day, and ane part of the next, in disputation upon that subject ; nothing being omitted be the adversaris, which thair owne inventionis, or the writings" of those who allow thair * The Booke of the Universal! Kirk, p. 1120. -)¦ Formerly Sir Thomas Hamilton, Lord Advocate, aud successively Lord Binning, Viscount Melrose, and Earl of Haddington. LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. XXV opinion, could suggest." * But if we may believe this writer, their arguments were " wiselie and learnedlie refuted by my Lord of Glasgow, whom Doctour Lindsay of Dundie, and Doctour Philip of Arbroath, Doctour Bruce, and sum others of the best and most learned did assist, with manie evident and pithie rea sons." He farther adds, " The Article was ordained to be voted in the Conference, and in end allowed be so great oddis of voices, as gave wonderfull contentment to all weel affected ; yet the number of the vulgar Ministers | having vote in the publict As- semblie being verie great, oure doubt rested what the event might be, of that which depended upon the opinions of an mul titude of ignorant and preoccupied people." At this Assembly it was agreed, that Scot, and Alexander Henderson, should be translated to Edinburgh ; but the transla tion of Scot never took place. J The strong aversion of the citizens of Edinburgh to the Perth Articles probably prevented their obtaining either of these ministers at that time. But this is an evidence of the high character which Scot maintained, and of his reputation as a preacher. Considering his decided opposition to the Perth Articles, it is not surprising to find him subjected to trouble on that ground ; but he seems to have experienced less molestation than some others of his brethren. In 1619 he was called before the High Commission held by Spottiswood at St Andrews, § and accused of being joint author with Mr John Carmichael, minister at Kilconquhar, and Mr Alexander Henderson, minister at Leuchars, of the anonymous tract, entitled " Perth Assembly," &c, proving * Wodrow MSS. vol. lxix., folio, no. 34. See also an account of this discussion in The Booke of the Universal! Kirk, pp. 1153, 1154. t A contemptuous epithet applied to those Ministers who were opposed to the Perth Articles. X Henderson remained as minister of Leuchars till the year 1638 ; when, against his own inclination, he was translated to Edinburgh. § The writer of the Statistical Account of the parish in 1796, speaks thus of Scot : " This gentleman was of the ancient family of Balwearie, possessed of a consider able estate, and a great favourite with Archbishop Spottiswood, with whom he passed much of his time in the neighbouring delightful retreat of Dairsie ;" (vol. v. p. 111.) Such intimacy, however, may well be called in question. XXVI LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. the Nullity of that Assembly,— (a work of which Mr David Calderwood was the author) — but they answered with so much wisdom, that the Bishop failed in obtaining any advantage against them and they were dismissed with threatenings.* It was pro bably on this occasion that Scot, in addressing the Bishop, styled him " My Lord," which led Mr John Eow of Carnock, who was strongly opposed to giving the Bishops their titles of hon our, to undertake a journey to Cupar to tender a reproof to his friend for this supposed species of compliance. This was a point upon which the Eeformers differed in opinion. Bow's argument was, that what was wrong in the Bishop to receive, must be wrong in another to give him. Scot considered that this title might be given to the Bishops on account of the civil honours conferred upon them by the King, f But Scot was not surpassed by Eow in his opposition to prelacy, and in his readiness to suffer rather than submit to the innovations then introduced into the Church. Shortly after this, at a conference held at St Andrews between the Bishops and the Ministers, whom the Archbishop of St Andrews called together professedly to advise about the best course for promoting the peace of the Church, Scot exhibited much firmness. After the Bishops and one of the ministers, Mr John Carmichael, had given their advice, Scot's opinion being asked, he prayed to be excused, as he had not that dexterity in giving expression to his sentiments possessed by some others, which appeared from the words he had uttered at Perth having been wrested to a sense which he never intended, and, in that sense, reported to the King ; but, when farther pressed, he made this noble reply : " I have continued in my ministrie manie yeers, spending moe goods nor ever I gained thereby; and now, the infirmities of my bodie and mind doth so increase that I doe verilie think the time to be neer of my relaxation; and if his Majestie be pleased sooner to discharge me, I am readie to * Row's History, p. 324 ; Calderwood's History, vol. vii. p. 392. f Row's History, p. 474. LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. XXvii undergo his will in that case, before I embrace these things that are urged." * Scot had hitherto performed the whole ministerial duties of the parish of Cupar alone ; but, about this time, in consequence of his growing bodily infirmities and the greatness of his charge, endea vours were made to procure for him some assistance. We meet with a minute of the Synod of Fife, held at St Andrews the 5th of October 1619, on this subject : " Anent the suit proponed be the brethren of the exercise of Couper in behalf of Mr David Dalgleish, that he may be licentiat to help Mr William Scot in the burdein of the ministrie their, and preach as he did befoir, per vices, it was thoucht altogether unlawful and contrair to an act of the General Assemblie, and theirfoir refused." f The Church of Cupar was, however, made collegiate about the year 1625, and Mr David Dalgleish was appointed second minis ter. $ Scot continued many years after this very useful to the Church, although little is known regarding him in the following period of his life. But it was during this time that he occupied himself in writing his " Apologetical Narration," now printed for the first time, § as appears from the manner in which he occasionally refers to events of that period. * Calderwood's History, vol. vii. p. 400. t Selections from the Minutes of the Synod of Fife, p. 90. % Dalgleish was admitted to the first charge immediately upon the death of Scot, and died in 1651. Selections from the Minutes of the Synod of Fife, p. 220. § The MSS. which have been made use of in printing this work have already been mentioned in the Preface. Here we may introduce the account which Wodrow gives of the MS. of it in his possession, and the estimate which he formed of the work itself. " There are two MSS." he observes, " said to be his yet preserved ; of which I shall give the reader some account. The first is his Apologetical Narration. This Mr Petry sometimes cites in his printed History, and I have a copy of it which I collated with another copy in the late worthy and learned Mr James Anderson's hands. This copy had been once in the late David Simson's, who, in Queen Anne's time, had a pension as Queen's Historiographer, and he wrote a few observes on the margin. In one of them he asserts that copy to be the original copy wrote by the author's own hand. What his authority was for this I do not know. It was exceeding fairly writ ten, and looked like a copy designed for the press, with the marks for all that was to be printed in italics and other letters. This MS., after Mr Petry, I call Mr Scot's Apologetical Narration ; for it hath no title in my copy, or the other, and yet I find XXviii LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. The Apologetical Narration has always been regarded as an authority by Presbyterian writers from the time it was written to the present day. Calderwood largely availed himself of its mate rials. Wodrow, indeed, expresses himself unable to say whether Calderwood had ever seen it ; but that he had seen and perused it we have every reason to believe. In revising the proofs we have compared the greater part of it with his History ; from which it is evident that he had not only read it, but made a very free use of it in the composition of his own invaluable work. Nor is Scot any mean authority. To his statement of facts great weight is to be attached ; for he was not only contemporary with many of the transactions which he records, but was actively engaged in them, and had, therefore, the best means of information. It is not known with certainty that Scot wrote any work except the Apologetical Narration. There is, however, reason to think that he was the author of a small work entitled " The Course of Conformity," which was published in 1622, 4to, and which has usually been ascribed to Calderwood. * It may be added that two Sonnets written by him at an early period, are printed in James Melville's Spiritual Propine. f The change which took place in ecclesiastical affairs in 1637 it agrees with Mr Petry's citations under that title. It contains about fifty sheets. It's neatly and very handsomely written in a plain style, and contains a good many original papers of these times." Wodrow adds, " Whether Mr Calderwood had the perusal of it I cannot say. He does not mention it amongst the rest of the materials from which he collected his large history. They were certainly contemporaneous, and Mr Calderwood outlived him. The substance of the Narration and most of the public papers are in Calderwood, but not all. It certainly deserves to be published, and is one of the clearest and most judicious accounts of this Church from the Reformation, but especially from the introduction of Prelacy to the end of King James the Sixth's reign and downward to the year 1633 that we have now remaining." The other MS., besides the Apologetical Narration here referred to, is " A Letter touching repairing to Diocesan Assemblies and Presbyteries." Wodrow having met with a copy of this letter, bearing the inscription, " Mr W. Scot of Couper," supposed it was written by him ; but having found it in substance engrossed in Calderwood's History without the form of a letter, he came to the conclusion that it was a letter from Calderwood to Scot on that subject. Wodrow's Life of Scot, and Wodrow MSS. Adv. Lib. Edin. vol. xxix. 4to, no. 5. * See foot-note to Preface, p. vi. t This work was published at Edinburgh, in the year 1598; See M'Crie's Life of Melville, vol. ii. p. 455-6. LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. XXIX and 1638, when the fabric of Prelacy which had been reared at so much expense of principle, and violation of law and justice, was overthrown, must have been contemplated by him with peculiar satisfaction ; and his wisdom and large experience would be highly serviceable to those who were the active agents in the movements of the second reformation. " It was a good providence to this Church," says Wodrow, " that we had some few old ministers, though they were very few, that had seen and borne a part in the glory of the first and purest state of the Church, and had come through a very long and black cloud of corruption for forty years, from the [year] 1597 to 1637, and had watched and kept their garments clean. They were of great use at the building of our waste places again in the [year] 1638, especially persons of such gravity, prudence and wisdom as Mr Scot."-* As to the history of Scot within the more limited sphere of the respective parishes where his lot was cast, we are without the means of acquiring much information. Had the Kirk-Session Ee- cords of Cupar during his incumbency been preserved, they would doubtless have furnished many interesting particulars connected with his ministerial labours, as well as illustrative of the manners of the age. At length Scot died on the 20th May 1642, f in the 84th year of his age, J and was interred at the west side of the burial ground of Cupar, where a handsome monument, said to be executed in Holland, was erected to his memory, with an inscription, which, from the action of the weather, and the little care taken for its preservation, is now quite illegible ; but, fortunately, it was copied and published by an industrious collector of Funeral Inscriptions in the year 1713. The old church of Cupar, which was erected * Wodrow's Life of Scot, MS. t " Mr Livingstone," says Wodrow in his Life of Scot, " tells us that Mr Scot lived to the year 1642 or 1646, I am not sure which it is in the original copy." But, from the records of the Synod of Fife, it appears that the date of his death was 1642. Selections from the Minutes of the Synod of Fife, p. 219. % The writer- of the Stat. Account in 1796, says, that Scot died in the 85th year of his age, (vol. xvii. p. 141.) XXX LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. in the year 1415, in the present locality, was an elegant structure, 133 feet by 54, with two rows of arches. In the same year, the spire of the church was built, by the Prior of St Andrews, up to the battlement; and, two centuries later, it was completed by Wil liam Scot at his own expense. To exemplify the barbarous taste of later times, the church was pulled down in 1785 ; and replaced by what was fondly imagined to be " the most convenient and elegant structure of the kind" in Fife. The steeple and spire, however, were preserved, and form a conspicuous feature of the town. The following is the inscription : ME WILLIAM SCOT'S MONUMENT. SCOTIS RESUSCITATIS, ANGLIS EXCITATIS, RENOVATO F(EDERE, REPARATA RELIGIONE, PROSTRATA HIERAECHIA, RESTITUTO PRESBTTERIO, SUCCENTURIANTIBUS ILLUSTRISSIMIS E PRIMA NOBILITATE ET MINISTERIO BENE MERITIS IN ECCLESIAM, NUN- QUAM SATIS MEMORANDIS, CONFIRM ANTE CJESARE BRITAN- NICO, ADSTIPULANTIBUS REGNI ORDLXIBUS, OBIIT PLACIDISSI- ME IN DOMINO UNUS, QUI NOBIS CUNCTANDO RESTITUIT REM, GULIELMUS SCOTUS, ecclesle cuprensis pastor, ex ILLUSTRI ET ANTIQUISSIMA FAMILIA SCOTO-BALVTRIANA 849 ANNO ^R^E CHRISTI, M.DC.XLII. A. D1. CAL. JUNII 13. [THE SAME " ENGLISHED," BT R. MONTEITH, M.A. *] " The Scots being again raised up, the Englishes animated, the Covenant being renewed, Eeligion restored, the Hierarchy thrown down, Presbytery again set on foot, the most illustrious of the chief Nobility and of the Ministry, favourers of the Church never enough to be remembered, all appearing, the King confirming, and the Estates of Parliament concurring, died most pleasantly in the Lord, one who by mature counsel restored to us our busi ness, Mr William Scot, Minister of the Church at Cupar, and * " An Theater of Mortality, or, a Further Collection of Funeral Inscriptions over Scotland; Gathered, &c, by Robert Monteitli," p. 201, Edinburgh, 1713 8vo. LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. XXXI the 84th person* lineally descended from the illustrious and ancient family of Scott of Balweirie. He died, 20. May 1642." From this sketch it is evident that wisdom, prudence, mode ration and fidelity were all combined in the character of Scot. The part which he took in the great controversy of his day between the Court and the Presbyterians we are at no loss to determine ; for, in his Apologetical Narration, he comments with great free dom upon the affairs which he relates. A man of his standing had powerful temptations to resist ; for had he become a supporter of the measures of the Court, he would doubtless have risen to high preferment. But, having adopted from conviction the cause of Presbytery, he entered cordially into the conflict against these measures ; and, possessing too high principle to yield his convic tions to the current of existing circumstances, he persevered in it faithfully to the close of life. Mingling with the leading men of the strict Presbyterian party in his day, he proved an able coadjutor, and possessed a high place in their estimation. James Melville, with whom he lived in terms of intimate friendship, uniformly speaks of him with the highest respect, reckoning him among the number of " the maist grave, godlie, and discreit breithring of the Synod of Fife." t Andrew Melville appears also to have highly esteemed him. In a letter to James Melville in 1611, he says, " Menalcas| of Cupar, on the Eden, is, I hear, constant ; and I hope he will prove vigilant in discharging all the duties of a pastor, and not mutable in his friendships, as too many discover themselves to be in these cloudy days. Salute him in my name." And in another letter to Mr Eobert Durie, dated Sedan, 24th May 1616, he says, " Faine wold I heare good things from Mr William Scott, Mr John Carmichell, and Mr John Dykes, * Monteith had evidently mistaken the year of Scot's age for the degree of his descent from the Scots of Balwearie. Sir Robert Sibbald, in the year 1710, supposes this family to have flourished for 500 years ; but the 84th in lineal descent would, even at a moderate computation, carry their pedigree to a few centuries anterior to the Christian sera ; certainly before the arrival of the Romans in Britain. t Melville's Diary, p. 386. X A classic name which, in conformity with a jocular style of address not unusual with him, he applied to Scot. XXXli LIFE OF MR WILLIAM SCOT. whom I hope the Lord hath not left destitute of his good Spirit, but that they shine as burning lamps in the mids of that confused darkness." * John Livingston, who was personally acquainted with him, thus speaks of him : " Mr William Scot, minister at Coupar in Fife, [was] a wise, learned, prudent man, who under stood the laws and customs of nations above many others. He was one of those who were called up to London before the pre tended Assembly of Glasgow, that brought in Episcopacy, and by his prudence he so helped the rest, as the enemies got no advan tage, and yet they were all sent home again, except Mr Andrew Melvill, who was committed to the Tower. It is said that the Earle of Salisburie, wondering at his wisdom, offered him a great pension and place, if he could have stayed in England, being sometimes in his house. I have wondered to see how he would give counsell in very intricate cases." t To conclude these remarks on his character in the words of Wodrow, " Among our ministers who succeeded the Eeformers of this Church, there were not many superior to Mr William Scot, in piety, gravity, learning, splidity in judgment, singular wisdom in difficult cases, stedfastness to the principles and purity of this Church. Even such who brought in corruptions and prelacy professed a very great regard for him, and he and Mr John Carmichaell seem to have borne the most conspi cuous share in the struggle maintained with the prelates from the [year] 1610 downward to 1630. They had the pleasure, indeed, when our Melvilles, Bruces, Boyds, Scrimgeors, and Simsons, and many other worthies of the elder sort were banished, confined, or removed by death, to observe a new set of very eminent men coming up to appear for the purity of the Church, of Mr David Calderwood, Mr David Dickson, Mr Alexander Henderson, with many more, who made a very great figure upon the happy turn, 1637." * M'Crie's Life of Melville, vol. ii. pp. 426, 532. t Characteristics, in Select Biographies, printed for the Wodrow Society, vol. i. p. 311. NOTICE OF THE LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. John Forbes, the author of the second work in this volume, entitled " Certaine Eecords," &c, was descended from Forbes of Corse, in the parish of Coull, Aberdeenshire. The founder of this house, from whom he was the fourth in lineal descent, was Patrick Forbes, the third son of James, second Lord Forbes, and armour-bearer to King James III., to whom that monarch, as a reward for his faithful services, granted by charter, dated at Edinburgh, 17th Dec. 1476, " Omnes et singulas terras Baroniae de O'Neil, videlicet terras de Coule, Kincraigie, et Corse," &c. Patrick Forbes, first of Corse, was succeeded by his son David, who has been described as a " gallant and brave man." David was succeeded by his son Patrick ; who again was succeeded by his son William, who early embraced the doctrines of the Eeformation, and is described by Dr Garden, the biographer of Dr John Forbes, as " a man of sagacity and spirit" — " vir sagax et magnanimus." He married Elizabeth, daughter of Alexander Strachan of Thorn ton, iii Kincardineshire, the head or chief of the ancient family of Strachan, and died in July 1598. Of this union there were seven sons and five daughters. 1. Patrick, the eldest, and heir of his father, was born in 1564, and became in 1618 Bishop of Aberdeen, an office which he filled for seventeen years. He was distinguished for his learn- XXxiv LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. ing, piety and worth, and died 28th March 1635, aged 71. He married Lucretia, daughter of David Spence of Wolmerston, in the county of Fife,* by whom he had two sons, William, who suc ceeded his father, but who died without issue, and John, the cele brated professor of Divinity and Ecclesiastical History in King's College, Aberdeen, who succeeded his brother ; but his male line becoming extinct, the representation of the family devolved on the house of Craigievar, which will be immediately noticed. 2. Wil liam, the second son, was educated at Edinburgh, and by his suc cess in commercial enterprise amassed a large fortune, with which he purchased considerable estates, as appears from no less than five charters executed in his favour under the Great Seal, of differ ent lands and baronies, some in Aberdeenshire, some in the county of Fife, and some in Forfarshire. He founded the family of Forbes of Craigievar, so called from the lands of Craigievar, in Aberdeenshire, which formed part of his property. 3. John, the author, of whom we are about to speak somewhat more particu larly, was the third son. 4. Arthur, the fourth son, who followed the military profession, was for some time abroad, where he distin guished himself in the Swedish service, and on his return settled in Ireland, and was created Baronet in 1628. His son was ele vated to the rank of the Irish peerage, under the title of the Earl of Granard, by Charles n. in 1675 ; from whom the peerage has passed by uninterrupted succession, from father to son to the present time. Of the other children little is now known. Captain Alexander, the fifth son, and James, of Knockandrach, the sixth son, both died without issue. The eldest daughter, Margaret, was married to the Laird of Thainstone ; the second, Agnes, to the Prior of Monymusk ; the third, to John Farquharson of Norham ; the fourth, Elizabeth, to Duncan Forbes of Campbell ; the fifth, to Alexander Ogilvie of Mildarie. * * Douglas's Baronage, p. 75 ; Lodge's Genealogy of the Existing British Peerage, p. 165; Lumsden's Genealogy of the Family of Forbes, with continuations, p. 21; Collections for a History of Shires of Aberdeen and Banff, printed for the Spalding Club, p. 607 ; Biographical Memoirs of Bishop Patrick Forbes, prefixed to Funeral Sermons on his Death, printed for the Spottiswood Society, pp. xxv., xxvi. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. XXXV The information which we now possess respecting John Forbes, relates, in a great measure, to his prominent share in some of the most important ecclesiastical transactions of his day, which at that time excited much interest, and involved the great principles con tested between King James and the Presbyterian ministers. He was born about the year 1570, and was probably educated at King's College, Aberdeen. Having studied for the ministry, and received licence as a preacher of the Gospel, he was first settled at Alford, a parish in Aberdeenshire, and the seat of a Presbytery. Into that remote part of the country the light of the Eeformation had but very partially penetrated, and the people were generally sunk in the ignorance, superstition, idolatry, and moral degradation of Popery. It was thinly planted with Presby terian ministers, and they met with much opposition and discour agement, particularly from the Earl of Huntly, whose whole influ ence was thrown on the side of the Popish interest. The situa tion in which Forbes was placed was, therefore, difficult ; requir ing much fortitude, prudence and fidelity, and he gave full proof that in none of these qualities was he deficient. The high estimation in which he was held by his brethren in the North is evident from their appointing him, in 1605, to appear in their name, first before the Privy Council, and then before the Court of England, to justify their proceedings in reference to the Earl of Huntly. At this time the Earl received much coun tenance, both from the King and his courtiers, which encouraged him not only to continue in the profession of Popery, but also> to employ his powerful influence for its support in the North of Scotland ; and from this it was manifest that the King, now when peaceably put in possession of the three kingdoms, was influenced in favouring the Earl from other considerations than the pretended one he had urged previously to his succession to the throne of England, — the necessity of conciliating the Papists of that country. Huntly thus presuming upon impunity through royal favour, did not scruple openly to treat with abuse the Presbyterian ministers when they made him the subject of c2 XXXvi LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. discipline ; and when the Synod of Aberdeen were taking steps to excommunicate him, he raised a process against them before the Council. This took place in February 1605. In these cir cumstances Forbes and Charles Ferme or Fairhqlme appeared before the Council to defend the proceedings of the Ecclesiastical Court in this matter. Stratoun, Laird of Laureston, the King's Commissioner, who seems to have" been more partial to the adher ents of Popery than to the stricter Presbyterians, whom he was accustomed to call, by way of contempt, " the Puritans," sent a letter to the Council, ordering them to give out letters of horning, warding and banishment against the ministers of the North, who had been most zealous and active in their opposition to Popery, and in proceeding against Huntly, provided they would not desist from the course of ecclesiastical discipline which they had instituted against him. The consequence was, that the Coun cil prohibited the Synod of Aberdeen, both by personal charges and by public proclamation at the Market Cross of that city, from proceeding against the Earl, under pain of rebellion. This was done under the pretext of the new offers which he promised to give in for their satisfaction. But Huntly, who had no sincere intention of submitting to the Church, failed in performing what he had promised, and derided the ministers when they required him to subscribe the Confession of Faith, declaring he would not subscribe it himself, and bidding his " man" subscribe it for him. This led to the appointment of Forbes by the Synods of Aber deen and Murray, with the advice of the Council, to repair to the Court in England, to furnish the King himself with a particu lar and correct account of the ecclesiastical proceedings in refer ence to the Earl, and to represent to him the lamentable condition of the North in consequence of the growth of Popery, and parti cularly to lay before him as one of their grievances, the encourage ment and support given to the Popish superstition by that noble man. * * Wodrow's Life of Forbes, MS. ; Melville's Diary, p. 570 ; Calderwood's History, vol. vi. p. 271 ; Row's History, p. 227 ; Forties's Records, p. 381. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. XXXV11 The letter of the Synods of Aberdeen andTVlurray to the King? informing him of the appointment of Forbes on this mission, is as followes : — * " It may please your Sacred Majestie, " The gret necessitie of our effaires in generall, and off the par ticular dealing we have this lang time haid with the Marquess of Huntlie, does enforce us, in all reverence and humbill submission, to acquaint zour Majestie with all our proceidingis, and present difficulteis quhairwith we ar straitit, and that be ane of our awin number, our loving brother Mr Jhone Forbes, off quhome baith for his fidelitie and uprightness, and for his sincere affectioun borne to the advancement of the kingdome of God, zour Majestie's ser vice and peace of the land, we haiff maid speciall choise, and have authorisit him with our commission toward zour Hienes ; beseik- ing zour Majestie, in all humbill and hartie affectioun, to grant him zour Majestie's gratefull acceptance, and favourabill countenance with ane indifferent eare, in his delyverie of suche thingis to zour Majestie as we have committed to his credit, trusting so far to the constant assurance, quilk our hartis does still brook, of zour Majes ty's unchangeable stedfastness and continuance in zour Hienes godlie zeall and fordwart affectioun ever hitherto borne, and at all tymes clearlie manifestit, to the maintenance and promoving of the licht and libertie of the Gospell of Jesus Christ, not onlie in the mater off doctrine but also in the odour of government and disci pline therein manifested, that gif zour Majestie graunt him audi ence but prejudice, he sail give zour Majestie ane full contentment of all proceedingis, and sail obten at zour Majestie's handis ane gratious answer to all our humbill and lawfull desyrs, all tending to the glorie of God, advancement of zour Hienes honour, and forder quyeting of zour Majestie's subjectis. The report quhairof, committing to the sufficiencie of our Comissionar forsaid, in all reverence, submission, and humilitic of our hartis, we tack our * Wodrow MSS. vol. lxix., folio, no. 24. XXXviii LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. leave, beseeking God to graunt to zour Majestie long and prospe rous reigne. " From our Assemblie at Aberdein, the twentie ane day of Februar, ane thousand sex hundreth and fyve zeiris. " Your Majestie's humbill subjectis, A. Blakburne. P. Blakburne. Chairlis Ferme. David Eaitt, Moderator. Ad. Burnett. Mr James Eoss. Mr Eobert Eeid, Scryb to the Provinciall Assemblie of Aberdeen. Mungo Guthrie, Moderator of theProvinciallAssemblieof Murray. George Dovglas, ane of the Commissioners of Murray. DuNDAS, Comissionar for Murray." Forbes went to Court in March in execution of this commission. The Earl of Huntly hearing of his journey, immediately proceeded to Court with all haste, to pre-occupy the mind of the King, and arrived there before Forbes. But Forbes being admitted into the King's presence, and having laid before him the grievances of the Church in the North, was favourably heard, and sent back with diligence, carrying a letter to the Council, strictly requiring them not to resist the authority and jurisdiction of the Church, * and another to the Church, containing assurances of the King's con stancy in the religion in which he had been educated, and his purpose to preserve unaltered the order of Church government established by law in Scotland, and the Acts of Parliament with respect to General Assemblies, t * It would, however, seem, that this letter was without effect ; for, in a letter to the King, dated 20th February 1606, by tho Synod of Aberdeen, in which the Synod " lamentabillie offeris to your Majestie the grieffis of the Kirk and all good men in our boundis ;" the following is one of their grievances : " Thirdly, that quhen the ministrie of the Synodis of Abirdeen and Murray laboris be the censures of the Kirk to reduce my Lord Marques of Huntlie, and Eai-11 of En-oil, to the aeknowleging of the treuth, and leaving of Papistrie, they are continually discharget he your Majestie's letteris of horning." t Melville's Diary, p. 570 ; Row's History, p. 227 ; Forbes's Records, p. 382. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. XXXIX At his return to Edinburgh from London the time of the meet ing of the General Assembly, which had been prorogued to July 1605, was approaching;* Forbes had some conversation on that subject with the Chancellor, who expressed himself not unfriendly to the keeping of the Assembly, provided it should only meet, and, without the transaction of any business, be dissolved ; while Forbes engaged to use his influence with his brethren that nothing more should be done, t The Chancellor, who was at heart no friend to the Bishops, was disposed, we have every reason to believe, from his opposition to them, to encourage the ministers to meet together, although afterwards, upon perceiving the King's hostility to that meeting, and his determination to punish those who had kept it, he became active in their prosecution from mere personal interest. And from this interview with the Chancellor, together " with the seemingly kind entertainment Mr Forbes had from the King while at London, to keep by the Acts of Parliament, by which the annual meetings of Assemblies were legally secured, and to hold by the constitution of the General Assemblies, Mr Forbes was * In the Assembly held at Holyroodhouse in November 1602, his Majesty being pre sent, the next Assembly was appointed to meet at Aberdeen on the last Tuesday of July 1604 ; hut this meeting having been prorogued, in the name of the King, by Laureston and the Commissioners of the General Assembly, to the 2d of July 1605, it was not kept ; the only Commissioners who came to observe it being three from the Presbytery of St Andrews. The Church awakening to a conviction of her pusillani mity and unfaithfulness in deserting that diet, many gentlemen and Commissioners from Synods in the South and West, convened at St Andrews, where the Synod of Fife were meeting, in September 1604, to take measures for holding the General Assem bly in July 1605. The same subject was brought under the notice of this Synod at its next meeting at Burntisland, April 30. 1605, in a letter addressed to the Synod by James Melville. By the way, it may be observed, that Calderwood in his History ap pears to have fallen into a mistake, when, in giving an account of this meeting of the Synod of Fife, he says, " The King's Commissioner was present, and promised to deal earnestly with the King for licence to keep the next ensuing Assembly," vol. vi. p. 278. Forbes in his " Records" certainly makes a statement the very reverse of this, pp. 380, 381. And Forbes's statement is corroborated by a letter which Laureston wrote to the King a few days after the meeting of the Synod. See Appendix, No. I. t The Chancellor was afterwards subjected to some trouble on account of what passed between him and Forbes on this occasion. He stoutly denied that he had ever given Forbes the slightest encouragement to hold the obnoxious Assembly. See a letter of his to the King on this subject in Appendix, No. II. ; with which compare the full and particular account which Forbes gives of the whole affair in the 12th Chapter of his " Records." xl LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. led to think that the time to which the last Assembly was ad journed might be kept without any great offence to the King and courtiers. Meanwhile it was singularly necessary for the preser vation of the liberty of General Assemblies; and what was Mr Forbes's opinion could not but have a considerable weight with others, considering he was just come from Court, and behoved to have the best views of the seasonableness of such a meeting." * The Assembly, accordingly, was held by nineteen ministers, who came to Aberdeen as commissioners, on the 2d of July. Its proceedings may be briefly stated. After sermon by Mr James Eoss, one of the ministers of the city, Sir Alexander Stratoun of Laureston, the King's Commissioner, having informed the Ministers assembled that he had a letter from the Privy Coun cil, requesting them, in a friendly manner, not to meet at that time ; it was agreed, as the Council's letter was addressed " To the Brethrein of the Ministry convened in their Assembly at Aberdeen," before reading it, to constitute the Court and choose a Moderator. The meeting having been constituted by prayer, Forbes was unanimously chosen Moderator, and the Council's letter referred to having been read, discharging the Assembly, and forbidding them to appoint another diet without previously acquainting his Majesty, the only resolution come to was to transact no business, and to prorogue the Assembly, with the advice of the Commissioner, to a new day ; and having requested Laureston to name a day and place for their next meeting, and he refusing to do so, the Moderator appointed the last Tuesday of September following. Upon which the Commissioner protested, that he never acknowledged the lawfulness of that Assembly, as the Moderator of the last Assembly and the Clerk were absent ; while the Moderator, in the name of his brethren, made a counter protestation. Then a messenger-at-arms, by order of the Com missioner, delivered to the Moderator a subscribed charge of his Majesty, commanding the Assembly to dissolve, under pain of horning. The charge having been read and considered, the Modc- * Wodrow's Life of Forbes, MS. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. xli rator, with consent of the rest, after prayer, dissolved the Assem bly. This is a summary view of the whole proceedings. The Assembly simply met ; chose a Moderator ; resolved to transact no business ; appointed a future meeting, and when charged by the King to dissolve the meeting, dissolved it. * After the disso lution, other nine commissioners, having been misled by the let ters of Laureston, and the Commissioners of the Church, in which the day of meeting was on purpose differently dated, made their appearance, eight on the 4th of July, and one on the 5th ; and they united in expressing their approbation of what their brethren had done. The tyrannical measures of the Court which followed are fully stated in his " Eecords," and need here be only glanced at. The ministers being summoned by order of his Majesty before the Privy Council, fourteen of them, t having defended the lega lity of their conduct, were condemned to be incarcerated in diffe rent parts of the country, some in the castle of Blackness, and others in the prisons of Dumbarton, Stirling and Doune. Forbes and John Welsh, being the most distinguished, and regarded as ringleaders, were treated with greater severity than the rest, being * The Council indeed published " A Declaration," &e., on the subject, giving a very different account ; but which Forbes has completely proved to be foil of misrepresen tation. A counter statement was published by the Ministers, entitled, " A Faithful Report of the Proceedings anent the Assembly of Ministers at Aberdeen, upon Tues day, 2d July 1605." Both these documents are in Calderwood's History, vol. vi. pp. 419 and 437. Spottiswood's narrative of this Assembly is just an abstract of the Council's Declaration. Wodrow, in his Life of Forbes, has some remarks on the in accuracy of Spottiswood's account, for which see Appendix, No. HI. t Among this number were two of Forbes's co-presbytors, who, along with him, had been chosen by the Presbytery of Alford Commissioners to Aberdeen Assembly, namely, Mr James Irvine, minister of Tough, and Mr Robert Youngson, minister at Clatt. These two, though not tried like Forbes for treason, were at last banished. Among other evils of the long imprisonment and ultimate banishment of these minis ters of the North, was the disastrous influence which it had upon the moral and religious condition of that part of the country, where, at that time, Presbyterian ministers were thinly planted, and where the labours of such zealous men could ill be spared. Accordingly, in the letter to the King, dated 20th Feb. 1606, by the Synod of Aberdeen formerly quoted, one of their grievances is, " that ane great num ber of kirkis, planted in this countrey, are leaft altogether desolate, be the lang conti nuing in ward of thair pastoris, seeing the maist pairt of utheris kirks arc unplanlit." Wodrow MSS. vol. lxiv. no. 39, p. 64. xlii LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. imprisoned in separate cells in the Castle of Blackness, and se cluded from all intercourse with their friends. These fourteen ministers having declined the authority of the Privy Council, as incompetent judges in their cause, because purely ecclesiastical, and, therefore, what should have been tried only by the Church Courts, six * of them were served with an indictment, to stand trial for high treason before the Court of Justiciary, at Linlith gow, in January 1606. The charge brought against them in their indictment was, that they had treasonably declined the authority of the Privy Council ; the charge of treason being founded on a law enacted in 1584, during the infamous administration of Arran, which declared it treason for any to decline the King and his Council as competent judges in all matters whatsoever; a law, however, which, in so far as it applied to ecclesiastical matters, was set aside by a subsequent statute in 1592. The Ministers appeared before the Court at the day appointed ; and had justice and eloquence prevailed, they would doubtless have been acquitted. Their counsel made an able and unanswer able defence. The speeches of Forbes and Welsh were bold and eloquent, exhibiting the most resolute firmness of purpose in adhering to the cause of truth, and yet the utmost respect and loyalty to their Sovereign ; and they made a powerful impression on the jury and all who were present. Forbes especially distin guished himself on that occasion. We shall quote his opening address to the Assize or Jury, as reported in one of the Manu scripts t of his " Eecords " : — " The reasoning being endit, and the assise to be inclosed, the pannel % desired yet to be heard ; in whose nsme Mr John Forbes did speak to the Assise : First, Earnestly willing them to take heed to themselves quhat they did in that matter, and * These were, besides Forbes, John Welsh, minister at Ayr ; Robert Durie, minis ter at Anstruther ; Andrew Duncan, minister at Crail ; Alexander Strachan, minister at Creich ; and John Sharp, minister at Kilmany. t This, the opening speech of Forbes before the jury, is taken from Swinton'sMS. See it as given in Gibson's MS. p. 480. X That is, the six Ministers before the bar. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. xliii gravely to consider the cause quhairof they were accused, lest, by ignorance or unadvisedness, they sould bring innocent blood upon themselves. And for removing all scruple that yet remained in their minds, anent their alledged contempt of his Majestie's com mand and disobedience to his chairge, in respect either of the pre- tendit chairge execute by Lawrestoun, or the Counsell's missive letter, or letter direct from the Commissioners, [he] first, protested in the sight of God, who knows the secrets of all hearts, that, as they should answer to him in that great day, they never heard nor understood of any sic chairge given publickly as was alleaged, neither that any notice or information thereof ever came to their eares, directlie or indirectlie, be Lawrestoun himselff, allbeit still present with them, in and at their Convention, or be the officer, or witness, or any uther living creatour, and that, in their conscience, they were perswadit, (and beleived that so also were the Lords of his Majesty's Counsel!,) that it was a manifest forgerie and falset ; neither would Lawrestoun, his officer nor witnes, stand to it, if they were earnestlie and exactlie examined. Besydes, that they had oftymes, by their letters of supplication to the Counsell, desyred to be heard, to reduce and improve the same, bot all their bills and suits were continuallie rejected be the Lords, and they never admitted to plead for themselffes ; in the quhilk action they durst be bold upon no less hazard then their lyffes, to tak upon them the verification of the falsehood therof. And for testification of their reverend regaird of obedience to his Majesty, declaired their readie and willing obedience, geven the 2d of Julij, in their Assemblie, these same letters being personallie execut against them ; quhairof they had famous testimonie under the subscription of their nottars. " Concerning the Counsell's missive, he declaired, first, That the very direction of it upon the back, if there had bein no uther neces- sitie, did sufficientlie witnes both the necessitie and lawfullnes of their Assemblie ; for seeing it was direct ' To the Brethreine of the Ministrie, conveined in their Assemblie at Aberdein,' it could neither be resaived, read nor answered, except they had bein as- xliv LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. sembled. Secondlie, touching the answering of it, That it was obeyed in the first pairt, anent their present dissolving and conti nuing of all the effaires of their Assemblie, to Lawrestoun his con tentment : as for the secound, ' that they sould appoynt no new day,' it was repugnant to the lawes both civili and ecclesiasticall. Besyde it was a thing quhilk of conscience they could not obey, in respect thereby the Kirk sould have beine depryved of her liber- tie, the Generall Assemblie sould have deserted, and all ordinar occasion, according to the lawand custome observed, and prescryved ordour of meitting, taken from the Kirk by their deid ; for the quhilk they could not have been answerable to their Synods and Presbitries who sent them. And farder declared, that befor the designation of the day maid be them, it was first offered to Law restoun to appoynt the nixt dyet, long or short as he pleased, and was refuissed be him. . Lastlie, concerning that letter, it being a privat missive and desyre of the Counsell, That it neither ought nor could import rebellion to his Majesty, and contempt of his Hienes command, allbeit it had been whollie disobeyed. " The letter sent from the Commissioners of the Generall As semblie, he declared that it could be no ground to infer disobedi ence to his Majesty, in respect both of the persons who sent it, and the form of it. For in the Generall Assemblie at Halyrud- ' house, in his Majesty's presence and with his consent, all power of prorogation, drifting, delaying or altering the dyetts of the Ge nerall Assemblie, was taken from the Commissioners; and ther- for they wer no wayes haulden to acknowledge ther command in that poynt. Nixt, in the forme it was most unlawful and repugnant to all lawes and resaived ordour of the Kirk, seeing it requyred ane prorogation indefinite to no certaine tyme nor place. Morover, that albeit disobedience might be inferred thereon, zet could it not, neither ought it to be layed to ther chairge, hot ther Synods and Presbitries, to whom the letters were direct, seeing they went at ther command, whom they are holden to obey. Be syde all this, that some of them had not resaived the said missive till they wer come to Aberdcin. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. xiv " And farder, to make it manifest that they could nowayes be accuissed for meitting without his Majesty's consent, [he] declared that they had ane warrand subscryved be Lawrestoun and Mr Patrick Galloway, appoynting that same day and that place for the Assemblie ; and heirupon regrated the strange dealling used against them, who being taken in no iniquity, whose doeing could be damned be no law, who were found within the compas of their calling, exerceissing the ordinar poynts therof, agrieable to the Word of God, according to the lawes of the land, ordinance and ordinarie custome and practeisse of the Kirk since reformation of religione; yet not the les wer so troubled in bodie, thrust into prissone, drawen befor judgment-seatts, condemned as evill doers, revylled as seditious, heigh mynded, unrewlie spirits, troublers of the peace of Kirk and Commonwealth, and authors of all the evills quhilk are brought and lyke to be brought upon the House of God; and that not only be the Counsell, bot be their own brethrein, the Commissioners of the Generall Assemblie, who as they were the very instruments and procuirers of all that harme to the House of God, so wer they the cheiff and principali authors of their trouble, by their callumnies and lies, entyseing and still in censing his Majesty against them, by a false pretence of disobedi ence ; intending to bring his Hienes by their pollicie to be ane promover of their iniquitie and wicked purpose of overthrowing the lawfull libertie, ordour and jurisdiction of the House of God, and bringing his Kirk again in bondage to that antichristian tyrranie of the Eomishe Hierarchie ; quhilk heirtofor, as contrair to the Word of God, hes -bane by publict profession, subscription and oath, abjured be themselffes : — quhilk wickednes, becaus it ap peared sumwhat to be impedit by their lawfull proceidings, ther- for was it that the Commissioners did endeavour to bring them to condemne and dissallow their own doeings ; ever collouring their malice with the schow of his Majesty's wrathe, steirred up be themselffes, and intending to cover their own wickednes with the cloak of their brethrein's sufferings, whom they mynd to cause bear, albeit innocent, the punishment of their iniquitie, that the xlvi LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. more secuirlie they may accomplishe their wicked intention against the Kirk. " Heirefter, that the Assyse or Jurie might know how farr that matter committed to their tryell did concerne themselffes in con science, he did remember them, upon that solemne Confession of Faith resaived, sworn and subscryved be every one of themselffes and the haill Lords ; in the quhilk they had sworne, by the great name of the Lord their God, not only to continue in the doctrine and discipline of the Kirk, bot also to defend the same, according to their vocation and power, all the dayes of their lyfe, under no les paine then the danger both of bodie and soull, in the day of God's fearfull judgment ; and therfor willed them to take heid to themselffes quhat they did in that matter, seeing they stood that day accuissed for exerceissing and maintenance of that discipline quhilk they were bound to defend, — for exerceissing of it in their Assemblie at Aberdeine, for maintenance of it in giving in ane Declinatour of the Counsell's judgment in a matter ecclesiastick, quhilk according to the said Discipline, Word of God and lawea of the land, ought only to be judged by the Kirk : lastlie, that they sould not be abuised by that false construction of their De clinatour given out by their adversaries, and thereby be induced to convict them. He oppened up to them the malicious glosse maid upon their Declinatour, as though thereby they had dis claimed themselffes from all subjection to his Majesty or his Coun- sell ; and for clearing of their innocencie in that poynt, did de- claire how at all tymes they had professed their willing subjection to his Majesty and his Secret Counsell in all things civili; so that by their Declinatour they had done nothing quhilk in any sort could derogate any thing to his Hienes Eoyall authoritie over them, or quhilk was contrair to the lawes of the kingdome or prac teisse of the Kirk in his Majesty's presence ; neither ever had they secluded his Majesty by their Declinatour from the judgment of their cause in the Generall Assemblie. And, for clearinsr heirof, he willed the assyse to read and considder their Supplication, given in to the Lords of Counsell befor their Declinatour; quhilk did LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. xlvii beare and expresse submission of them to the Counsell and other civill judicatours, in quhatsoever thing they sould be found to have transgressed against any civill law ; and heirwith [he] did delyver the coppie therof to the clerk, to be read to them ; and farder willed them to consider of the declaratione of their Declinatour, then instantlie maid be them befor the Justice and Lords, quhilk was insert in the Justice bookes ; and so concludet with significa tion of their readiness to seall up the trueth and veritie of all that they had done and suffered for with their lyves, as the veritie and trueth of God, quhilk both they and the Lords and assyse or jurie were obleidged, by their forsaid Covenant, to maintaine ; and ther- for chairged them in the sight of God, so to judge of them that day as they would wishe the Lord to judge of themselffes in that great day quhen they sould be compelled to render an accompt to him of their forsaid oath and bond." Forbes's second speech at the bar, in reply to the Lord Advocate, was equally characteristic. The application which in the perora-r tion he made to the King of Saul's violation of the covenant and oath which Joshua entered into with the Gibeonites, and of the punishment of that violation in Saul's posterity long after his death, produced a thrilling impression. In the expressive language of James Melville, who was present, " the quhilk maist pithilie reas- soneing, from less to moir, he applyit to the King ; and thairon, directing the admonition and threatneing most terribill, maid all the heiraris astonischit, and their hairis to stand." * But these defences, powerful and eloquent though they were, proved unavailing. It was the determination of the Court that they should be found guilty ; and to effect this the most discredit able arts were employed. From an apprehension of the difficulty of their condemnation, the Earl of Dunbar, Lord High Commissioner, was sent down to Scotland to bring them to a trial by jury, and to secure their conviction. The Court, instead of being held in Edin burgh, where the citizens were friendly to the Ministers, was held * Melville's Diary, p. 625. xlviii LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. at Linlithgow ; twenty of the Privy Councellors were appointed assessors to the judge ; the jury was packed with the kinsmen and friends of the Earl of Dunbar, and, in his address to the judges he attempted to bribe them by promises, and to overawe them by threatenings. After the jury had retired, the Crown officers, upon learning that it was their purpose to acquit the Ministers, held with them the most illegal intercourse, endeavouring by all means to influence them to return a verdict of guilty. It was by such disgraceful methods as these, that a majority of nine to six found the prisoners guilty of treason. The doom to be pronounced was delayed for some time till his Majesty's pleasure should be known. The King at length resolved to banish them out of all his dominions for life, and) having communicated this resolution to the Council,* sentence was formally pronounced upon them on the 23d of October, and on the 7th of November they embarked at Leith for France. The scene on that occasion was very affecting. Many of their friends were assembled to bid them farewell. Before embark ing they fell upon their knees on the shore and prayed with much fervour, which greatly moved the spectators ; and, after joyfully singing the 23d Psalm, took leave of their brethren and acquain tances, went into the ship, and landed safely in France, t Such was the result of the proceedings against Forbes and his associates, which the great body of the intelligent people of Scot land at that time regarded as tyrannical and oppressive, and which produced in them a deeper aversion to Episcopacy and an increas ing dislike to the Bishops, whom they believed to be the chief insti- * The King at the same time wrote to the Council informing them of his purpose respecting the other eight ministers who had not heen brought to trial, hut who were lying in prison. By the letter to the Council, Mr Charles Ferme was ordained to be confined in the Isle of Bute ; Mr John Monroe in Kintire ; Mr Robert Youngson in the Isle of Arran ; Mr James Irvine in Orkney ; Mr William Forbes in Shetland ; Mr James Grey in Caithness ; Mr Nathaniel Inglis in Sutherland ; and Mr John Ross in Lewis. Messengers were directed to charge the ministers to enter tho places of their exile, and " not to exceed the same without licence under pain of death." Spot tiswood's History, p. 499. f Melville's Diary, p. 669 ; Row's History, p. 210. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. xlix gators of this as well as other severe measures adopted against the Presbyterians. * Forbes spent the remainder of his days on the Continent,! where he was eminently useful and highly, respected. He main tained a close correspondence with some of the most eminent divines in Holland and France, $ and travelled through most of the Protestant Churches. § The first account of him, after his banishment, which we meet with, is in two letters written shortly after by Mr Welsh to Boyd of Trochrig. In a letter dated Eochelle, 7th March 1607, he thus speaks of Forbes : " Monsieur Forbes is gone to Sedan, upon what occasion I know not, ffor he did not wrytt to me, only Patrick Morrise hes advertisit me of this." || In another letter to the same individual, dated 7th May 1607, he thus writes : " The Bishop of Glasgow is come to Ffrance : I suspect verele that it is for me and Mr Jhone Forbess, that we sail not be sufferit in this kingdom, for the King regards not much the rest. It wer guid that in your * Spottiswood in a letter to the King, previous to the trial of the Ministers, plainly states that such was the effect produced by their imprisonment. And such feelings were undoubtedly increased after their condemnation. See Appendix, No. IV. t Such also was the fate of his companions in exile, with only one exception. A few particulars concerning them may be here introduced. Welsh, after remaining for some time at Bourdeaux, became minister of Jonsack, in the province of Angoumois. He died in London in 1622, whither he had ventured to come, in the hope that King James might have granted him liberty to return to Scotland for the benefit of his health. Durie, like Forbes, settled in Holland, and, in 1609, became minister of a Scotish congregation at Leyden, where he continued to labour with fidelity and acceptance till his death, which took place in September 1616. Duncan was received into the college of Rochelle ; but having made some acknowledgment to the King respecting the Aberdeen Assembly, he was allowed to return from banishment. He was afterwards prosecuted before the High Commission, and imprisoned for non conformity to the Articles of Perth. He died in 1626. Strachan sickened and died at Middleburg soon after he landed on the Continent. Sharp was made Professor of Divinity in the University of Die. (M'Crie's Life of Melville, vol. ii. pp. 432, 435 ; Steven's History of the Scottish Church, Rotterdam, &c, p. 312 ; Row's History, Wod. Soc. edition, p. 323.) X He was the intimate friend of Andrew Melville, and they kept up a close corre spondence when abroad. Melville, " in the course of the year 1612, was gratified with a visit from Forbes, who spent several weeks at Sedan along with his brother Arthur, an officer in the Swedish service." (M'Crie's Life of Melville, vol. ii. p. 432.) § Wodrow's Life of Forbes, MS. || Wodrow's Life of Boyd, printed for the Maitland Club, p. 280. d 1 LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. next letter, M. Plessei were informit to resist it sa far as he may, gyf such thing be." * Forbes afterwards became minister to the English merchants at Middleburg, and was the founder of the Pres byterian Church in that place. Some of his successors belonged to the English Nonconformists ; but the congregation tenaciously preserved its Presbyterian aspect, and has often been served by a minister of the Church of Scotland.f Forbes, while he continued in this place, was much respected and very useful. " From inci dental hints in the records of Consistory, there is pleasing evidence that he was greatly beloved by the people here for his Christian worth, and for his zealous pastoral fidelity." % After Forbes had been some years in exile, proposals were made by the Court both to him and to his associates to make some acknowledgment to the King, with the view of having their sen tence of banishment remitted ; and there were not wanting many considerations to induce Forbes to comply with the terms offered, even though these should involve some compromise of principle. Both his own health and that of his family had suffered much abroad ; he had many beloved relatives and friends in Scotland ; and the native land of the exile is endeared to him by many tender associations. But he and all his fellow exiles § rejected the terms offered, as involving a dereliction of principle which could not be conscientiously and honourably made. In a letter which he wrote to James Melville || on this occasion, he nobly expresses his determination not to abandon the principles of which he had been so fearless and powerful a champion in his native coun try. " We ought not rashly," says he, " to contemn the peace and liberty offered us in the name of the Prince. But if under the external mask of liberty they seek to draw us into a slavery worse * Wodrow's Life of Boyd, printed for the Maitland Club, p. 305. t Steven's History of the Scottish Church, Rotterdam, &c., p. 312. X Ibidem, 317. § Andrew Duncan had been allowed to return to Scotland upon making some ac knowledgment. The other ministers were not so compromising. || James Melville much esteemed and respected Forbes. He describes him as "ane faithfull brother and godlie minister in the North." Melville's Diary, p. 570. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. li not only than imprisonment and exile, but than the loss of life itself, we are not to purchase the liberty of out bodies by inthralling our souls." * Still, however, he ardently longed, were it the will of providence, to return to Scotland. In the year 1616 he went to England, and after waiting six months, was admitted to kiss his Majesty's hand, and obtained a promise (which was never realized) that he and Durie would be relieved from banishment, f About two years after, he expresses his feelings on the subject of his return in a letter to Boyd of Trochrig, dated Middleburg, 10th May 1618. " Eight reverend and heartily beloved Brother in the Lord. — My love and duty remembered. I am glad to hear of your good health, though it please the Lord to exercise us here with sickness. I thank God I myself now enjoy tollerable health ; but my wife and diverse of my family are still troubled with sickness. Hitherto, since my dwelling in this town, my house has never been free from sickness. He that sends it knows we have need of it. By this you may consider if we would condescend to return home ; if so be we did see the Lord preparing the way to us. But rather or we stirr a foot hence without him, we are ready to endure what more it shall be his pleasure to lay upon us. We should indeed have the more heart to come home if all things were at peace. For my own part, I neither desire to see, nor to be a partner any more of the troubles of our Church. If I could be an instrument of peace, I wish I might at the loss of my life procure it. But the Lord knoweth what is meetest. Here we are in good hope of quietness, within short time, for the better side prevails daily more and more." &c. } In this letter he informs Boyd that he was about to set out for London, probably with the view of using means to obtain the King's permission to return to Scotland. He also expresses his desire to hear Boyd's particular opinion of his " Treatise tending to clear the Doctrine of Justification," printed at Middleburg in 1616, * M'Crie's Life of Melville, vol. ii. pp. 434-436. t Ibidem, vol. ii. p. 447. j Wodrow's Life of Boyd, p. 139. d2 Hi LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. a copy of which he had sent to Boyd. " I beg to learn from you, something more concerning your judgment of that latter treatise I sent you ; for I shall not be ashamed to be taught by you, and im proved in quhatsoever mislyketh you, either in the order or matter thereof; for we both love and labour to learn daily." This treatise is dedicated " To his well beloved in the Lord, the faithfull of the English Church in Middleburg, whose love to the truth hath en tertained his ministrie among them." After it had been printed on the Continent, Forbes sent a copy of it to King James, together with a letter, dated July 24. 1616, requesting his Majesty to grant permission to its being printed in England, and dedicated to him.* This favour does not, however, appear to have been granted ; for an edition of it was not published in England till the year 1635. The time when Forbes entered upon his charge at Middleburg has not been precisely ascertained ; but it was probably in 1611 ; and he continued here till 1621, when he accompanied the Factory of the English merchants from Middleburg to Delft, and was the first stated Presbyterian pastor in that place. But his persecutors at home did not suffer him to live and die at Delft in peace. He was removed from his charge by the jealous interference of the English government. He however remained in Holland, and died about the year 1634. f Forbes was the author of various works, of which Charteris gives the following list : " He wrote diverse treatises and sermons. Item, The Saint's Hope and Infallibleness thereof. 8vo, Middleburg 1608. Item, A Treatise tending to the clearing of Justification. 4to, Middleburg, 1616. Item, A Treatise how God's Spirit may be decerned from Man's own Spirit. Lond. 1617. Item, Four Sermons on 1 Tim. vi. 13, 14, 15, 16. 4to, 1635." Forbes left behind him three sons, John, Arthur, and Patrick. \ Arthur, who devoted himself to the military profession, took the side of the Covenanters. He " was seised upon at sea, anno 1639," * See this letter in Maidment's Analecta Scotica, vol. ii. p. 353. t M'Crie's Life of Melville, vol. ii. p. 448. X MSS. account of Various Families in Scotland, Advocates Library, Edinburgh. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. liii says James Gordon, parson of Eothiemay, " and casten for some tyme into prisone at Newgate, in Londone, by the King's war rant." After his liberation he was promoted by the Covenanters. " Monroe had ane horse troope mustered and putt under the com mand of Arthur to go to Aberdeenshire. But according to Gordon, who sets every thing connected with the Covenanters in an odious and ridiculous light, he gained little merit by his exploits in the North. " Before summer [1640] was spent, having been ordered to waite upon Monroe in his expedition to Strabogye, without order, the Captain and his troope fell to robbe the coun try, or rather to steale away a number of Strabogye men's cowes and other bestiall ; which was so displeasing to Monroe, (though the comittye of the shyre wold have taken it for good service,) that Forbesse was put out of credite by it, and his troope broken and reduced ; he and they having been nothing else but a laugh ing stocke for sometyme in the country about." * Forbes's son, Patrick, subscribed the Covenant in presence of the famous Assembly at Glasgow, 1638. t Mr Patrick Forbes, says a MS. account of the Glasgow Assembly, " was so much the more gladly received, because that his father before him had been ane sufferer for the truths of Christ Jesus. To whom the Modera tor said thir words, ' Come forward, Mr Patrick ; before, ye were the son of a most worthy father, but now, ye appear to be the most worthy son of ane most worthy father.'"! Patrick Forbes appears to have been for some time minister of Delft, although not immediate successor to his Father; and he afterwards became chaplain to the Earl of Teviot at Dunkirk. But he did not ad here to his Father's principles ; for, returning home with the King at the Eestoration, he conformed, and was consecrated Bishop of Caithness in the year 1662. He possessed this See * Gordon's History of Scots affairs, published by the Spalding Club, vol. iii. pp. 196, 197. See also Spalding's History of the Troubles, vol. i. pp. 222, 223. t Bow says, that the person who subscribed was a minister of Holland, Mr John Forbes, son to Mr John, at Delft, banished for the cause of God. History of the Kirk of Scotland, p. 504. See also Baillie's Letters and Journals, vol. i. p. 144. X Errol MS. quoted in a note by the Editor, in Gordon's History of Scots affairs, vol. ii. p. 4. liv LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. until his death in the year 1680. Wodrow, in his Analecta, states an anecdote unfavourable to his religious character, on the authority of Mr H. Cross, minister at Bower, in Caithness, who informed him, that Patrick Forbes, Bishop of Caithness, " when there, was too much given to profane swearing, and was termed ' the swearing Bishop.' A grave minister happened to be with the Bishop, and a gentleman who had an evil habit of swearing, and in that company could not refrain. After once or twice swearing, of which the Bishop took no notice, the minister thought it proper to give the gentleman a rebuke ; and among other things he insisted that it was aggravated, because he swore before the Lord Bishop. The gentleman, with a tart enough pun, replyed, ' He was certainly mistaken in his reproof, for he swore not before but after my Lord Bishop.' " APPENDIX LIFE OF JOHN FORBES. No. I. — Letter prom Sir Alexander Straiton or Laureston to the King. * Sir, — Pleis zour most excellent sacred Majestie, of laitt I acquentit zour Majestie anent the proceeding of the Sinod of Fyff, speciallie thair pur pose of keeping ane Generall Assemblie at Aberdein, the fyfe of Julij nixt ; for preventing of quilk attemp the Conimissioneris and I haif declarit zour Majestie's plesour heirin, and haif requyrit zea comandit tham and all other Sinodis in North Britaine, to forbeir ony sik meting. Zet informit they meane not to cease, hes takin resolutione to avait on that day and place, to resist that meting with authoritie yf they went thairto. The towne of Edenburgh, with quhome I haiff utterlie contestit, of new hes gevin in leittis. The most pairt inclynis to haif Mr Patrick Galloway to supply that vacant place in thair kirk. Hk zeir producis new effeiris, but since that matter is zett in deliberatioun, the Bishop of Galloway, quha, with diligence is to repair to zour Majestie in that and all other particularis concerning the Kirk, vill gif zour Majestie cleir relatione. Wishing zour Majestie long, hapie and prosperous raigne, I humble kiss zour Hienes handis. Edinburgh, 4th of May 1605. No. n. — Letter prom the Earl op Dunfermline to King James VI. f Maist sacred Soveraine, I crave your Majesty's favour that it may be lesome to me giff entrie * Wodrow MSS. vol. lxix., folio, no. 7, p. 10. t Wodrow MSS. vol. lxix., folio, no. 46, p. 79. This l»tter is printed in the Miscellany of the Spalding Club, vol. ii. p. 152. lvi APPENDIX TO THE to this letter, with some report of the antiquitie. 1 think, to a man that hes delyted all his dayes in letters writing to the maist learned and wyse Kyng in the warld, it can nocht be imputt to great amisse, albeit some memorie of learning be intermixed thairin. I red that Marcus Scaurus, a man of great renoune amangis the Romanes florente republica, being accused by Qnintus Varius of a verie odious cryme, that he sould haiff ressaved money fra the King Mithridates, for to betray the affaires of Eome ; — efter his accusar had deduced all argumentis and probatiounes he could devise, he used naa other defence but this, Quintus Varius ait, Marcum regia pecunia corruptum, rempuMicam prodere voluisse. Marcus Scaurus huic culpce ajjinem esse negat, utri magis credendum putatis. Whilk defence was followed with the acclamation of the haill peple, condemning the accusar as a calumniator and a lyar, and acknowledging the defendar's undoubted vertew and honestie. Maister Jhone Forbesse, a condemned traitour for his rebellious and seditious conventicles, haldin as General Assemblies, against your Majestie's authoritie and command, accuseis your Majestie's Chancellar to haiff geven advise, counsall or consent to the halding of the said mutinous Assemblie. Tour Majestie's Chancellar sayes it is a manifest lye ; and, if it might stand with his honour and dig- nitie of his place, to enter into contestation with sic a condamned traitour, could cleirlie verifle the same. Master Jhone Forbes and all his colleigis, abyddis still at the mantenance and justification of that their Assemblie, as a godlie and lawful proceeding. Tour Majestie's Chancellar, by his publict letters, dischargit and contramandit the said Assemblie ; he hes sensyne condamned the said Assemblie as a seditious and unlawfull deid, and all the pertakers and mantenars of the same as mutinous and seditious persones. Tour sacred Majesty hes to judge whilk of thir twa is maist worthie of credeit. Farther, I think not neidfull to impesche your Majestie in this mater ; bot some information I haiff sent to Mr Alex ander Haye, whilk it may please your Hienes to accept and heir off, when best lasour fra mair weightie affaires may permit the same. Swa, maist humblie taking my leiff, and praying the eternal God lang to preserve your Majestie in all felicitie, I rest, Tour sacred Majestie's maist humbill and obedient subject and servitour, DUNFERMELYNE. Edinburgh, 25th Maij 1606. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. lvii No. III. — Wodrow's Remarks on Spottiswood's Account of the Assembly at Aberdeen. * In the account of this whole matter of the Assembly at Aberdeen, and the subsequent trouble and trial of the Ministers, I have purposely omitted taking notice of Bishop Spottiswood's account of this matter, in his History, pp. 486-490 ; that so I might spare myself the trouble of contradicting that most partial Historian at every turn ; and when I have given a full state of this matter from original papers and other direct vouchers, I may leave the reader to compare what is above with the disguised and most unfair account given by the Bishop ; who, I must think, could not but know facts to be otherwise than he hath represented them, because, at this time, he was at the top of affairs, I may say, and of far greater inte rest and activity than even Gladstanes the Primate, and was active to draw somewhat from Mr Forbes to the Chancellor's disadvantage, till he brought him to appear for the temporalities of Bishops, and could not but understand the state of the Ministers affair. However, I shall point out some of the most glaring misrepresentations the Bishop gives. In the entry, he owns that the Assembly was continued or adjourned to the day at which Mr Forbes and the rest of his brethren convened ; but then, he says, " The King being informed of a great preparation that the ministers were making for keeping that meeting, and that they intended to call in question all the conclusions taken in former Assemblies for Episcopal government, directed the Commissioners of the Church to desert the diet, and make no indiction of another till he should be adver tised. They accordingly did intimate his Majesty's pleasure to all the Presbyterians, and therewith, as they were desired, declared that his Majesty did purpose to call a number of the Bishops and disaffected ministers to Court, and, for preventing such disorderly meeting, hear the differences that were among them debated in his own person," f If the King had such an information as this, I doubt not it was from this author and the Bishops, who stood not to fill the King's ears with misre- ports of the ministers ; and I as little question but the King, willing the * From Life of Forbes, in the Wodrow MSS. belonging to the Library of the College of Glasgow. t The quotation is inaccurately made by Wodrow, and is therefore here taken from Spottiswood's History, p. 486. lviii APPENDIX TO THE Commissioners to delay the Assembly, proceeded from these misreporls, and the Commissioners and Bishops fears of their being called to an account for their breach of their commission, and scandalous contravening the Assembly's Cautions. But as there were no conclusions agreed to directly for Episcopal government by former Assemblies, though, indeed, too much agreed to that was an inlet to it ; so I am persuaded the Minis ters had no hopes, and, therefore, no design to call in question what was already concluded in Assemblies : whatever endeavours they no doubt designed to use, to have the limitations and Cautions established, for preventing corruptions in Ministers, Voters in Parliament and Commis sioners from the Assembly, and the due and yearly keeping of such Assemblies, made as effectual as they could. But though there had been undue designs, as there was none among Ministers, was this a sufficient ground for the Bishops and Commissioners to put the King upon an open breach of promise made in the last Assembly, and a direct counteracting of the Act of Parliament and Act of the last Assembly ? This is indeed the shortest way with Dissenters; but a method not capable of defence though fairly enough owned by the Bishop. And lastly, I cannot free him of falsehood when he says, The Presbyteries were acquainted in their letters by the Commissioners of a meeting the King designed before himself for peace ; which the reader may see from their letter itself above set down, page . . * where so far are they from pretending this, that they declare their earnest desires of an Assembly, and their endeavours to have one, and that they would continue in them with the King. This is a specimen of the Bishop's sincerity in the entry. It would be too long to notice each paragraph of the Bishop's misre presentations. I see no ground to think that most Presbyteries resolved to obey the Commissioners letter ; since many things which fell in hin dered the Commissioners coming up to Aberdeen ; neither is it fact that Mr Forbes and Mr Welsh were in expectation of a frequent Assembly, and thought chief ringleaders of this stir, as he calls it. There was a general inclination in the uncorrupted part of the ministry for an As sembly ; neither was it any small encouragement from statesmen which made them move in this matter ; but [a sense] of their duty to God and his Church. The Bishop, in the next room, I cannot but think over the belly of clear * Sec this letter of the Commissioners in Forbes's Records, p. 38-1. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. lix conviction to the contrary, insists upon Laureston's pretended charge, the day before the Assembly, and that, as he pretends, by letters from the Council ; whereas, by the Registers and otherwise, he behoved to know that the Council's instructions were expressly not to charge them till he presented their letter; neither did he do it, however scandalously he falsi fied the charge afterward, as we have seen; and the reader is left to judge, whether Laureston's guilt in so doing, under the weight of the fears of the treatment he might meet with from the Prelates, or the Bishop's homologating this, after what he knew of the matter, and pub lishing it to the world, is the greater. The speech, I suppose framed by the Bishop for Laureston, (for Mr Forbes and the Ministers represent the matter quite otherwise, and I doubt not, truly,) is pretty enough, and contains a prelatical stretch of the prerogative, That the Parliament is disposed as the King thinketh meet. I fancy it would have been hard for Mr Laureston and the Bishops assistants to have defended this position, That upon a supposition of an Act of Parliament for annual meetings, trienicall or septennically, the King might break in upon it. It's directly false, (I beg pardon for thir flat words, but what is above supports me in them,) That the Assembly requested Laureston to remove for a little, and then, in a trick, chose a Moderator. This whole matter stands in its full light in the pre ceding accounts, which could not be called in question by the Ministers greatest enemies while they were alive to answer for themselves. It was next said, Laureston denounced them rebels ; but it was the Councill did it some time after. Meanwhile the Bishop, though he no doubt knew the Ministers public answer to Laureston's charge, is pleased to pass that over in silence. It was indeed not fit to be told by him ; it would have spoiled part of his former tale. The preventing the Ministers meeting in September is given as the ground of Mr Forbes and Mr Welsh's summonds before the Council. But as the first was never sum moned, but tricked in before them and then imprisoned, this was not the real cause. The summoning of these two would not have been any great stop. They had stronger ways to prevent a meeting in September, and a good many others were attacked and imprisoned, August 2, two months before October 3 ; which the Bishop is pleased to forget, that he may throw the odium mostly on Mr Forbes and Mr Welsh. He 1ms some pretext for reckoning all but the imprisoned Ministers acknowledgers Ix APPENDIX TO THE of their offence ; and yet it was not the case of all either. Several were passed over by intercession, without any acknowledgment, as Mr Archi bald Simpson ; others did not compear and so were overlooked. In this acccount of the Council's proceedings, Oct. 24, the Bishop had reason to suppress the loyal and reasonable petition of the Ministers which he could not but know of, and homologates the Council's finding their Declinature treason ; or rather coins this as a reason for the Council's deferring censure till the King's mind were known. One would think they were hardly enough censured for any thing they had done, and their close after imprisonment were censure without a sentence, as he repre sents it. But all this is but a pretext to load the King with their after trial, while himself and the rest of the Commissioners were pushing it. Every branch almost of his account of their trial has some perversion of facts in it, most injurious to them and the worthy Ministers convened at Linlithgow. He represents that their brethren supplicate for liberty to convene with them as if they had been obstinate persons and already intercommuned ; whereas this was the Advocate's own proposal, and nei ther their brethren nor Advocates that day dealt with them to relinquish their witnesses, &c. There was not [the] least different sentiments among them and their brethren ; and the whole ministers approved their procedure. I fear I have wearied the Reader by this time, with thir hints at the Bishop's unjust representations of this affair ; but it's a pity his cunning misrepresentations of every thing relative to the worthy Ministers, his contemporaries, should have been so long without being exposed in their own colours. No. IV. — Letter from Archishop Spottiswood to the King. * Please zour most Sacred Majestie, I wes in the way towardis zour Hienes, quhen it wes my gude happe to meit my Lord the Erl of Dumbar, quhow requyrit me to stay a quhyll, upoun ane opinioun his Lordship hes, that my service heir at this tym may be stedable. I zeldit willinglie, as hafing no other desyr but to do zour Majestie service, quhairevir, at home or abroad. Amongest uther thingis, I wes to haiff menit to zour Hienes the grit prejudice that is done to our Kirk effairis be this detening of the Ministers in ward, the burthen * Wodrow MSS. vol. lxix., folio, pp. 27, 2S. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. lxi therof being cast upon us, of purpose to make zour Majestie's design in the erecting of Bishops the more hatit, and other discontentit spiritis serving tham with this as a ground to -work sum unquyetness in the State. This, Sir, I impute onlie to the neglect of zour Majestie's direc- tionis gifin in that mater, quhilis we were together at Courte, the suspi- cioun of quhilk neglect, I persafit your Majestie had evin at that tyme. But quhat hes ben zour Hienes gud plesure since the using of thair De clinator I nevir understud, till my Lord his cumming hither, saif that a brute went of the calling tham before the Justice. And none will deny that is sound myndit, but [except] that they haif merit a more hard deal ing ; zit as matteris are now handlit, and the peple disposit, any man seis it sail not go for zour Majestie's honour and contentment. " Thairfore, Sir, out of a sincere affectioun to zour Hienes, am I bold, in mayst humble wyse, to entreat zour Majestie, that it may be zour gracious plesure to supersed that business, and renew only zour Majestie's first command ments, that so many as stand obstinatelie at the defence of thair proceed- ingis, may, by sentence of Counsell, be exylit your Majestie's cuntrey, and others that will acknowledge thair errors, may be confinit within thair parochis during zour Hienes gud plesure." Quhilk opinion, if it sail please zour maist excellent Majestie in zour wpsdom] to approve, than, Sir, let me desyre this farder, that the same may be done during the Erl of Dunbar his residing heir, or else, I am of opinion, zour Ma jestie sail never see it concludit. This, and many other things, Sir, are done of mere policie to disapoint zour Majestie's affairs in the Parlia ment ; speciallie that concern our Estait. But if it please God, zour Majestie sal haif, or it be longe, a' more particular narratioun of thingis, and assurance sufficient, as I hope, for ane happie successe of that service that is so gretlie opposit unto. Mean quhyl, Sir, I must also signifie to zour Majestie the invaliditie of the renunciation maid be the Duke of Lennox, of the Bishopfick of Glasgo, that the samyn may be renewit, and to that effect, zour Hienes wilbe plesit to continew that particular designatioun of landis, quhilk his G[race] is suting presentlie to my coming up, that zour Majestie may haif the securite that is requyrit, see ing his satisfactioun is so great. As for sum particular injuries offerit me, quhilk hes plesit my Lord of Dunbar to mentioun in his letter to zour Majestie, I will not repeat thaim, and, I trust, by his G [race's] meanis, to be reparit. For this tym I cease crafing zour Majestie's lxii APPENDIX TO THE humble pardon for this my importunite, and praying God Almightie to blisse zour Hienes with a longe and happie regne. Tour Majestie's most humble and obedient Servitor, Glasgow. Edinburgh, the 26th of December 1605. No. V. — Letter from Mr John Forbes to the King, in vindication of his loyalty and speeches. * It may please zoure sacred Majestds, As I had resolved to trouble your Majestie no moir, zour Majestie not willing to heir from me any moir, so did I think that no man suld have bein so malicious, whom my bypast troubles suld not have stayed from seiking my farder harm ; but now heiring • that the Conservitour suld in form zour Majestie of traducing speiches uttered be me against zour Majestie, I most crave pardoun of zour Hienes to declar my innocencie. The Lord hes laid this law upon me that I suld not speak evill of the Prince of my peple ; the conscience of which dutie hes, dois, and still I hoip, by God's grace, sail inforce me to take head to my speeches of your Majestie, althocht ther were no man to control! me ; and besyd the testi- monie of my owne conscience, I know their is no place where I have bein, nor prince, or any uther person, with whom I have conferred, but can, and, if neid beis, will witness where constantlie I have stood to the defence of zour Majestie's honour against all sinistrous, either reports or conceitts of men, even speciallie in that same wherin I am now traduced. Nether ever remember I that ever to any I did speak any thing that micht have giffin the smallest occasioun to forge such a calumnie, except onlie that conference twiching zour Majestie which was betwixt the Conservator, Mr Robert Durie, and me, in tlie Conservatour's own chalmer ; wherein he with us, and we with him, lamenting the prejudice that everie where amang gud men did arys to zour Majestie, for the too gryt favour and clemencie used to the adversaries of God's treuthe, zour Majestie's most bitter enemies, and the harder dealing with zour Majestie's most loving subjects, professing the said treuth with zour Majestie : and so falling to speak of the judgments of men, I did schew him that I had * Wodrow MSS. vol. lxix., folio, no. 53. LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. Ixiii seen one who, passing to Ingland, did affirm that he did carie thether letters from Rome, wherby he had wrocht gryt prejudice in the heart of many in France ; wherwith long grevyd, I did communicat this my greiff to the Conservatour, ever desyours that zour Majestie micht know it, lyk as he did in no less measure lament the sam inconvenient to me. Bot that I ever did speak that zour Majestie had changed with the Pop letters, or that I did affirm this report of this man to be trew, or did therupon traduce zour Majestie to any creatour, that [if?] he or any uther can prove it, then do I not refuss the deserved punishments. And what wes my part toward zour Hienes in that speech to the Conservatour, his awin testi- monie, givin me at my departing, and taking of his loive which he wold have me to tak, in testimonie that he esteemed me a faithfull and loyall [subject] to zour Majestie, ar sufficient to cleir me of all calumnie ; for besydes his favourable using of me at my being heir, he did dismiss me at my going away, with als honest a testimonie as he culd give to the most faithfull servand that ever did serve zour Majestie ; and not only so, but promised to mak it knowin to zour Majestie, what faithfull dutie I had keiped in all perts towards zour Hieness, so that by no man culd I have looked of that man anie report to be spread to my prejudice. The Lord forgive him, and make zour Majestie wyss to discern suche flatteries ! for so long as zour Majestie is willing to heir evill of zour servants, ther sail nevir be wanting who sail invent calumnies to our harme. Nather speak I this to obtain the benefit of my peaceable return to my countrey ; for, sence zour Majestie is not resolved to grant [this], I have resolved to bere with the loss of it, till it pleis the Lord to inclyne zour Majestie's heart to farder clemencie. Bot althocht I never return, zet mynd I, by God's grace, to prove no less dutifull and faithful in all reverence, love and obedience to zour Hienes, then if I did enjoy all the favour zour Majestie can zeald me ; for I do not as uthers respect zour Majestie for gain, nor peace, nor courtesy, nor any commoditie worldlie, sae muche as for conscience, and that carie I with me whithersoever I go. I hoip the Lord sail give me this grace to love him, and to honour the King always. If zour Majestie had pleased to heir myself befoir this tym, zour Majestie wold have had better pruf of my honest and upricht heart to zour Hienes ; but gene zour Majestie will nather have me nor my labors, I rest in patience, still faithful thocht never imployed, and your Majestie's ever, — althocht forsaiken still loving and honouring zour Hienes, — althocht zour Majestie both suld halt me and lxiv APPENDIX TO THE LIFE OF MR JOHN FORBES. procure my scheme [shame], praying to God to bless zour Hienes, and pros per zour throne, and continew zour posteritie theron to the end, and to con found all zour Majestie's enemyis and evill willers, and in tym expedient to mak knawin to zour Majestie who ar faithfull and who not. The sure mercies of David be with your Majestie for evir ! Tour Majestie's most humble and obedient servand, most unjustlie oppressed and undeservedlie traduced. (Sic Subscribitur,) Mr Johne Forbes. No. VI. — Letter prom Mr John Forbes '- To my Reverend Bretheren the Pastors and Elders of the English Church at Amsterdam." * Reverend and Beloved in the Lord, — As I did send you the copie of the Acts concludit at our last Synod, so I would have satisfied your desyr in the other things, now as befoir requyred by you, if they had bein in my possession ; but the truth is, that they ar in the hands of Mr Wing, J who did not send them unto me with the Acts, but hes retained them, as I think, till he have first regis- trat them in his owen book ; therfoir, if you please to wryt unto him, I think he will satisfie [you] in that poynt. The Lord grant your desyr in making us of one mind in the truth, so shall his name be moir glorified and his Church more edified, and brotherly love moir regarded ! To his grace and blessing I commend you. Tour loving brother in the Lord, Jo. Forbes. Delph, 16th Decemb. 1623. * From the Original, among Papers of the English Reformed Church, Amsterdam. Obligingly communicated by the Rev. Dr Steven, Edinburgh. The ministers of this church, at that time, were Mr John Paget and Mr Thomas Potts. Steven's History of the Scottish Church, Rotterdam, &c., p. 279. t Mr John Wing was at first minister at Sandwich in England, and then chaplain to the Merchant Adventurers at Hamburg. In the year 1 620 he was settled at Flush ing, whence he was translated to the Hague, and was admitted pastor of the English Presbyterian Congregation there, May 11. 1627, by Forbes, who was then minister at Delft. Ibid. pp. 302, 306, 308. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Preface, . . . . . . v Notice of the Life of Mr William Scot, . . xi Notice of the Life of Mr John Forbes, . xxxiii Appendix to the Life of Mr John Forbes, . . Iv APOLOGETICAL NARRATION OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK OF SCOTLAND, .... 3 [Marginal Notes in thF Wodrow Manuscript, *"] 1558. Of the Book of Order of Geneva ; The Book prefixed before the Psalms ; The number of Ordinary Church Officers ; Cartwright ; Of Funeral Sermons, . . . ib. Of Superintendents, and the First Book of Discipline, 4 1560. The First Confession of Faith ratified ; Observations of the First Book of Discipline, . . , . ib. ' Superintendents, Exhorters and Readers, for an Interim ; First Book of Discipline not strictly to be observed ; The reason of instituting Superintendents ; Readers permitted ; No new Bishops in the Diocess of the old ; The country divided in provinces ; Superintendents no ordinary officer ; The First Superintendents, but five Superintendents, . 5 * The MS. of Scot's Apologetical Narration among the Wodrow Collection of MSS., besides the Marginal Notes of the Author, contains various others written by Wodrow himself. These, from their utility in reference, have here been collected into the Table of Contents. lxvi TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1560. The difference between the Superintendents and our pre tended Bishops ; Anent the Election of Superintendents, &c, of old, . . . . • .6 Ministers no members of Parliament unless for advice in mat ters of religion, . . . . . .8 Other Observations out of the Book of Discipline ; Fasting and Festival Days forbidden ; Of changeable and un changeable Ceremonies, . . . . .9 The First Course of Government, bt Superintendents and Commissioners fob Provinces, ... . .10 Four sorts of Assemblies in our Kirk ; Presbyteries not at first because of the rarity of- Ministers ; Weekly exercise ; No precedence in degrees among Ministers ; Commissioners institute ; The power of Superintendents and Commissioners of Countries limited by the Acts of the Assemblies, . ib. Superintendents may be removed by the General Assemblies; General Assemblies twice a-year ; Superintendents tryed by them ; Superintendents delated ; Book of Discipline is the rule for admission and removal of Ministers ; Synods twice a-year ; Appellations ; No appeal from the General Assembly ; Ministers judges of the complaint of a Superin tendent, . . . . . . .11 Superintendents must associate Ministers ; The Superintendent had others joined with him to judge ; Commission to try complaints against Superintendents ; No mention of Super intendents but where was a reformed kirk ; Superintend ents exercise jurisdiction not alone ; Superintendents must associate the Elders of their own kirk, . . .13 Of the three Popish Bishops converted ; But have no power of jurisdiction ; The late Bishop of Galloway not admitted Superintendent there, . . . . .15 1563. The three Bishops visit their own bounds as Commissioners ; Complaints on the old Bishops ; Question anent civil offices ; Superintendents delated for faults ; Commissioners and Superintendents all one ; Orkney and Galloway delated ; TABLE OF CONTENTS. lxvil 1563. Orkney marries the Queen and Bothwell; Appointment anent Galloway ; Mr Row visits Galloway ; Orkney restored ; Commissioner of Isles rebuked ; Galloway inhi bited ; Orkney accused, . . . . .16 Of the order and necessity of General Assemblies ; Moderators freely chosen, and not always Superintendents ; The old Bishops never chosen ; Who had vote in Assemblies ; Their Commission ; Their change ; The end of Assemblies and their work ; Their privilege of orders and diets, . .17 The power of Synods increased ; Matters referred by the As sembly to Synods ; Matters sometimes referred to Superin tendents now referred to Synods, . . .18 1566. The purity of God's worship preserved ; The Helvetian Confession approven ; Holy days excepted ; a Letter to England; Consultation craved for separating the Jurisdic tions ; Anent the marches betwixt Ecclesiastic and Civil Jurisdiction, . . . . . .19 The Second Course : Of Bishops, Superintendents and Commissioners fob Provinces. 1571. August. The Court seeketh Bishops to be erected ; Mr John Douglas presented to the Bishoprick of St Andrews ; In hibit by the Superintendent of Fife to vote in Parliament ; Collectors of the Thirds discharged; Superintendent of Angus complains of it, and of collation of benefices and erection of Bishops ; He complains again to the Regent ; The Regent's answer ; The inhibition discharged ; Superin tendent of Angus writes to the rest for a meeting to consult of Policy, 20 1572. January 12. The Conclusions at Leith for Bishops, Deans, &c. ; Commissioners to treat with the Regent and Report, 21 Commissioners appointed by the Regent; Articles agreed upon at Leith by the said Commissioners, . . 22 These Articles approven by the Regent, Feb. 1 ; The Nobles scope in them ; Tulchan Bishops, . . .24 Adamson's three sorts of Bishops ; Douglas chosen Bishop of St e2 Ixviii TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1572. Page. Andrews ; Scot took instruments of his dissent ; Mr Knox's freedom; Douglas inaugurated; His answer to the Su perintendent's question ; He reads his answer ; Hands im posed, . t . . . . . .25 Mr Knox's malecontent ; Conclusions of Leith to be revised by Knox, &c, . . . . . .26 March. An Assembly ; Some appointed to revise the Articles ; Douglas's places ; Beza's advice concerning Bishops, . ib. Conference about the Articles concluded at Leith ; Offence at the names of Bishop, &c. ; Protestation that the Articles are but for an interim; In effect no agreement; Other Bishops inaugurat, . . . . .27 Knox buried ; Morton Regent ; an Assembly at the Regent's desire ; Superintendents continued where Bishops are ; Sundry things laid to the charge of the new Bishops; March, 1573. Douglas complained upon; Douglas delated again; His death ; Paton, Bishop of Dunkeld, delated, suspended ; Bishop of Murray delated ; Boyd, Bishop of Glasgow, neg ligent ; Gordon of Galloway discharged ; His crimes ; Appointed to be excommunicat if he satisfy not ; Satisfieth ; Is restored to preach, but not to jurisdiction, . . 28 March. Acts for curbing Bishops and Superintendents ; The Assembly's answer anent civil places of kirkmen ; A minis ter cannot be a civil or criminal judge ; Pont delated ; Ecclesiastical and civil places, . . . .30 The General Assembly not moderated by Bishops, . . 32 1574. March. General Assembly's supplication to the Regent; Act in favour of Assemblies amissing ; The Bishops not greater in power than Superintendents ; The Bishops differed not from Superintendents except [in] the manner of their entry and vote in Parliament, . . . . . ib. 1575. March. Commissioners to treat of Jurisdiction and Policy; Bishops to be tried by the Assembly before their election ; An article anent Bishops, . . . .32 Durie's Protestation anent the Office of Bishops ; Question, If Bishops have their functions from (he Word of God ? com- TABLE OF CONTENTS. lxix 1575. Page. mitted to reasoning, and their answer ; A Bishop may be deposed by the General Assembly, if he be not found qua lified, . . . . . . .33 The points wherein thet agree concerning the Office of a Bishop or Superintendent, . . . .34 The name Bishop common to all Pastors ; Bishops to take charge of a particular flock ; Visitor, . . . ib. The Third Course : Of Visitors, . . . 35 1576. Bishops ordained to take them to particular flocks ; The country divided for the Visitors ; Power of Visitors, . ib. The Office of Visitor accessory to the Ministry ; The Office of Visitor a corruption ; Motion anent Presbyteries, . 36 1578. How long Visitors continued ; Acts anent Bishops ; They are to be called by their own name ; No more Bishops to be elected ; Bishops to submit to reformation ; Corruption in the Estate of Bishops ; The Office of Bishops damned, July 1580, . . . . . .37 Of Exhorters and Readers ; Readers put away ; The Bishops forced to submit ; April 1576, Bishop of Glasgow delated ; October 15. 1578, he submits to reformation ; Mr Patrick Adamson ; Presented to St Andrews, April 1577 ; He is delated ; Commission to try him ; He submits ; October 1578, Commission to censure him ; July 1579, renewed ; His faults ; He submits ; Bishop of Dunkeld enjoined, . 39 Of the Second Book of Policfe, . . .41 1576. — April. Appointment anent the Policy ; Of the pains taken for the Constant Policy ; October, their travells revised, ib. 1577. — April. The heads of Policy debated ; Digested ; Regent acquainted ; Fast, . . . . ib. Policy to be presented to the Regent ; Beza of Bishops ; King James the VI. takes the government on him ; Regent resigneth the Government ; Policy to be presented to the King; Fast, . . . . . .42 lxx TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1578. Report of the King's Answer ; Conference with the Council ; Commission for new Conference; October 1578, anent vote in Parliament, . . • • .43 1579. July. The King writes to the Assembly; The Assembly craves further Conference ; Assembly's Letter to the King, 44 1580. July. Assembly's Desire; Conference anent Presbyteries, Elderships, Parishes; Mortoun accused; Some special heads of the Second Book of Policy, . . .45 The Fourth Course : Of Presbtteries enduring till the tear 1610, ...... ib. Of the Second Confession of Faith ; January 1580, Confes sion of Faith subscribed by the King's family ; Affirmative and Negative ; Bishops abjured by the Covenant, . 46 1581. April. King's Letter to the Assembly ; Piatt of Presbyteries ; Instructions for erecting of Presbyteries by the King's Orders; King's Letter to Nobles; Presbyteries erected; Policy registrat, . . . . . .48 Mr Robert Montgomery provided to Glasgow ; October 1581, he is inhibit ; April 1582, he is deprived ; Montgomery's excommunication ; The enterprize of the Lords at Ruthven, called Gowrie's conspiracy ; The King at Ruthven ; Mont gomery seeketh reconciliation, . . . .49 1583. Bishop Adamson, his courses against the Kirk; Adamson consulteth a witch ; Cited to the Assembly Oct. 1583 ; Sus pended ; Goeth to England ; A new enterprise of the Lords, 50 1584. Ministers forced to fly out of the Country ; February 1584, Melvill declines the Council ; Melvill, Davidson, and Gal loway flee, . . . . . .51 May. A Parliament ; Adamson and Montgomery sit in Par liament ; Command anent Ministers of Edinburgh ; Pont protests against the Acts; Mr James Lawson and Mr Walter Balcanquhall withdraw themselves and protest, ib. Of Mr Adamson's Declaration of the Acts ; Ministers urged subscription of obedience to Bishops ; Banished Lords re turn ; Road of Stirling ; Parliament, . . .52 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Ixxi 1584. Page. Ministers seek abrogation of Acts of Parliament ; Write their Exceptions ; The King pens a Declaration, . . 53 1586. February. Conference in favours of Bishops ; April, Adam son excommunicat ; Adamson appeals to the King ; May, Adamson's Process held as not led; Protestation against that, . . . . . . . ib. A mixed form agreed upon in this Assembly ; The conditions of the former Conference assented to, with conditions anent Bishops ; Commission to process Bishops ; Four Office bearers in the Church, . . . . .54 1587. This mixed form endured not; June Assembly ; Presbytery of Glasgow enjoined to annul their admission of one to their temporality ; Letter to the King anent Mr Pont ; All Pastors to be subject to Presbyteries ; Confession of Faith to be subscribed ; Instructions to the Commissioners to the King, 55 1588. Adamson delated and deprived of his Commissionrie ; Mont gomery satisfieth, . . . . .56 1589. January. The King desired to subscribe the Confession de novo; March 1590, Commission to receive the subscrip tion of all Estates, . . . . . ib. 1590. August. The King's testimony in commendation of our Kirk; Act for subscribing the Book of Policy ; Act annulling the power of Visitors, . . . . .57 What Ministers accepted Bishopricks, . . .58 Adamson hateful to the King ; Adamson absolved upon his desire, . . . . . . .59 1591. April. Adamson recants; Subscription to the Book of Policy still urged, . . . . . . ib. 1592. Assembly's desire to the King ; Liberty of General Assem blies, Synods, &c, ratified, . . . .60 1593. The number and seats of the Presbyteries; The seat of Pres byteries not alterable but by Assembly; The order and power of Presbyteries, . . . . . ib. Of Moderators ; The order and power of Synods ; General Assemblies, . . • • • .61 The Presbyterial and Episcopal Government compared to- lxxii TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1593. Page. gether ; The objection of confusion answered ; Presbyterial Government better than Prelatical, . •- .62 The Objection of error and schism answered ; Hepburn's opi nion of the Soul ; Apostacy follows a General Bishop, . 64 The Fifth Course is of the Episcopal Government which now holdeth bt usurpation and violence, . . 65 The occasion of altering the Government ; The Popish Lords excommunicat and banished, . . . . ib. 1596. March. Corruptions searched out ; Fast; Davidson's exhor tations ; Fasts appointed ; Complaint upon the Popish Lords ; Commission to prepare Articles to the King, . 65 Papists ; Politicians ; Exchequer appointed ; Octavians, . 67 June. Huntly's return ; Convention at Falkland ; Ministers oppose Huntly's return ; Convention at Dunfermline ; Sep tember, Errol returneth, . . . . . ib. Assembly at Cupar ; The King is offended at the Assembly for meeting ; Melvill's free speech to the King, . . 68 Oct. 20. The Ministers divide the country to settle a corres pondence ; Commissioners from every quarter to stay at Edinburgh per vices, called the Council of the Kirk ; Infor mation of dangers ; Fasts appointed, . . .69 Nov. 9. The Ministers Grievances to the King ; The King's Answer ; The Ministers Reply, . . . . ib. The Council of the Kirk's advertisement to the Presbyteries ; Fears of altering the liberty of the Kirk, . . .70 Black cited, convened for his freedom in the pulpit ; Minis ters directed to the King with new Grievances, . .71 Nov. 15. Their Report; Ministers sent back to the King anent Mr Black ; The King's Answer ; Black's Declinature ; The Declinature sent to the Presbyteries; Four hundred subscribe it ; Spottiswood one, . . . . ib. Nov. 24. Commissioners of the Assembly convene ; Minis ters sent to the King; The King's answer; Overture to pass from the Declinature ; The Ministers offer ; Re port, . . . . . . .72 TABLE OF CONTENTS. lxxiil 1596. Page. Black summoned ; The lieges discharged to meet with minis ters ; The Commissioners charged off the town, . . 73 Nov. 29. Articles to the King and Council ; A new De clinature, . . . . . .74 Nov. 30. Ministers to assist Mr Black and present the Articles; Black's second Declinature; Resolution of the Ministers ; Proposals from the King about Mr David ; Con ference with some from the King, . . . ib. Second message from the King ; Articles of agreement ; The King passes from them; Black convict, and the punish ment referred to the King, . . . . . 76 New Conference anent Mr Black, . . . .77 Dec. 9. Message sent to the King ; Black charged North ; A Letter for a Convention of State and Kirk, . . 78 Commissioners Exhortation to the ministers of Edinburgh, 80 Dec. 14. The Ministers charged off the Town ; The Ministers obey ; The Commissioners Declaration to the Presbyteries, ib. The state of the difference betwixt the King and the Kirk, 81 Dec. 16. The King desires Conferences; Mr Bruce's Answer, 82 Intention anent some citizens, . . . .83 Dec. 17. Balcanquhall's speech to the People; Barons con vene; Bruce's Exhortation; Some directed to the King; Bruce's Discourse with the King ; The Report ; A Covenant sworne; The manner of the Tumult, Dec. 17; Articles sent to the King, . . . . .83 The Articles not presented ; The King goes to Linlithgow ; Strangers charged off the Town ; The Session removed ; Citizens warded ; Ministers commanded to the Castle ; .The Ministers withdraw ; No cause of altering the Government, 86 Mr Patrick Galloway refuses the band ; Fifty-five Questions printed ; The meeting at Perth appointed, . .87 1597. Feb. 8. Synod of Fife; Commission to the King; Pres bytery of Edinburgh, . . . . . ib. Feb. 29. Assembly at Perth ; Sir Patrick Murray's diligence ; Ministers in North; Mr James Nicolson changed; Mr James Melvill's advice and resolution, . . .88 lxxiv TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1597. Debate anent assembling ; Eight Presbyteries hold it no Ge neral Assembly ; Eleven Presbyteries hold it an extraordi nary Assembly; Mr David Lindsay, Moderator, without election ; Clerk not orderly admitted, . . .89 Thirteen questions resolved ; No publick reasoning ; The rest referred ; Commission anent the Popish Lords ; Mr Bruce away ; Mr Andrew Melvill; Mr James Melvill withdraws ; Mr Thomas Buchanan ; Conference with the King, . 90 Differences betwixt this and preceding Assemblies, . .91 April 27. Assembly ; Protestation ; Ministers of Edinburgh cleared ; Black returns, . . . . .92 May 15. Assembly; Mr Rollock; Mr Thomas Buchanan changed ; Andrew Melvill ; Davidson's Letter, and Protest for the liberty of the Church; Perth Assembly ratified; Other Articles agreed ; Imposition of hands ; Popish Lords, 93 The cheefe Workmen for Episcopacue enabled with a Gene ral Commission for the better effectuating of thedj purpose, . . . . . . .94 Commission to Ministers ; Their power ; The General Com mission is the introduction of Episcopacy ; Difference be twixt this and former Commissions; The bait; Some named for the fashion, . . . . . ib. June. Rutherford's sentence reduced ; The General Commis sion begin to rescind the Acts of Assemblies and Presby teries ; Mr Black and Mr Wallace removed from St An drews ; Gladstanes brought to St Andrews ; A new Rector, 95 Three Earls relaxed, . . . . .96 The First Step to our Prelates grandeur : Ministers vote in Parliament, . . . . . . ib. Dec. Parliament ; Petition for Ministers vote in Parlia ment; The Overture of Assembly, 1581, anent vote in Parliament; Answer of Assembly, 1582, anent it ; Appoint ment, May 1592, anent it, . . . . ib. Anent Ministers vote in Parliament ; How Prelates vote, . 97 TABLE OF CONTENTS. lxxv 1597. Page. Vote in Parliament granted ; The Presbyteries informed ; Ordinary time of Synods altered ; Feb. 1598, Synod of Fife ; David Ferguson's discourse ; Mr John Davidson ; The Melvills warning ; Black Saturday, . . .98 1598. March 7. Assembly anticipate ; The Assembly in Dundee for settling the Third Estate in Parliament ; Melvill and others charged away ; Grievances against the Commis sioners ; King's promises ; Commissioners approven, . 100 Commission renewed ; Their Power ; Members of the Com mission ; Commission anent Ministers of Edinburgh, . 101 The King's Declaration for Vote in Parliament ; Opposed ; The affirmative carried by ten Votes, . . .102 Mr Davidson against Vote in Parhament; Mr Davidson's protestation against establishment of Bishops, . .103 The number of Voters ; Their election ; The Synods to con vene all in one day; Commissioners to meet with the King, . . . . . . .104 Three Commissioners out of a Presbytery ; Themselves trans gress ; Mr Bruce urged with imposition of hands, . 106 June. Synod of Fife, . . . . . ib. Heads anent vote in Parliament, .... 107 Caveats of Vote in Parhament, .... 108 His name [the Kirk's Voter in Parhament] to be Commis sioner for such a place, . . . . .109 Court willing to accept Voters in Parhament upon any terms ; Assembly prorogate to 1600 ; Letter to the Pope ; Basili- con A«go», ..... . 110 1599. Nov. 17. Conference at Holyroodhouse, . . . ib. 1600. March. Assembly ; Mr Peter Blackburne's Recantation ; Wilkie, Moderator ; Policy to carry the Vote ; Privy Con ference ; The King breaks it off; Simile of the Collier and Waker, . . . . . . .112 Cautions ratified ; Melvill charged to his lodging, . .113 Conclusions at Falkland ratified ; Act anent the continuation of Voters in Parliament, . . . .114 Commission renewed ; Ministers of Edinburgh discharged not Ixxvi TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1600. Page to' preach; Anent Gowrie's treason; Mr Bruce charged off the Kingdom, ...... 115 October. Conference at Edinburgh ; Three appointed to Vote in Parhament, . . . . .116 1601. Feb. Synod of Fife; Gladstanes, challenged ; Lindsay re buked, 117 March. A Meeting at Bruntisland ; Assembly anticipat ; Hall Moderator ; James Melvill's Letter of Advice to the General Assembly, . . . . . ib. Mr Davidson's Letter; Mr Davidson committed, confined, . 118 Causes and Remedies of defection ; Ministers of Edinburgh reported ; Commission renewed ; King's promise, . 119 1602. Nov. Assembly; Melvill's Protestation ; Visitors appointed, 120 Sept. Synod of Fife ; Grievances ; Assembly's answer, . ib. Commission renewed ; Overtures anent stipends ; Resolutions anent the Plott, ...... 121 Nomination of some more that the King would present to the vacant benefices ; Mr Bruce not suffered to preach in Edin burgh, . . . . . . .123 Dame Whitelaw loosed from sentence of excommunication by the Commissioners of the Kirk ; King's harrangue before his going to England ; The King refuses to take off the Ministers confinement, . . . . .124 Conference at Hampton Court ; Proclamation against Papists ; Ratification of the Service Book ; Three hundred Ministers suspended, deprived [or] excommunicated, . . 125 1 604. July. Parliament ; Treaty anent union, . . . ib. August. Synod; Spottiswood challenged; Confession sub scribed ; General Assembly shifted ; Convention of Minis ters ; Assembly continued to July 1605, . . 126 Iniquity abounds ; Commissioners from St Andrews keep the diet at Aberdeen, July 1604; Protestation, . . 128 Convention at St Andrews ; October 1604, Convention at Perth ; Grievances anent the Commissioners ; Answer ; Mr George Graham's promise, . . . .129 Articles agreed ; Letters continuing the Assembly, July 1 605, 131 TABLE OF CONTENTS. lxxvii 1604. Page. Commissioners appointed to keep the Assembly at Aberdeen, in July 1605; The meeting not frequent; Prevarication anent the diet, . . . . . .132 1605. Ministers that keeped the 2d July 1605; Ross preacheth; Laureston present ; Laureston removeth ; Mr John Sharp, Clerk ; Council's Letter considered ; Laureston coming in is contented ; Laureston removeth ; Next diet appointed September next, . . . . . .133 Laureston returned ; Protests that this was an unlawful As sembly ; Moderator protests ; The Assembly charged to dissolve ; Instruments of their willingness and obedience, . 135 Others Commissioners come on the 5th of July ; Instruments of their presence and approbation of the proceedings ; Pres byteries approbation ; Laureston's misreport ; Forbes and Mr John Welsh committed, .... 136 July 25. Charge to Aberdeen to suffer no Assembly, . 137 August 2. Other Ministers imprisoned ; The pest, . . il August 8. Presbyteries discharged to approve it ; Charge to all to delate the approvers, . . . . ib. Oct. 3. Fourteen ministers cited to Council; Seven com mitted; Some pass from it, . . . .137 Sept. 2. Synod of Fife held out of Dunfermline ; Convene at Inverkeithing ; The imprisoned's Apology and Petition, . 138 Proclamation of an Assembly without any year, . .139 Oct. 24. The imprisoned cited before the Council; The Ministers Petition to the Council ; Their Declinature, ib. The Ministers answer to the libel, . . . .140 The Ministers sentence ; And remitted to their prisons, . 148 1606. January. Six Ministers put to an assize ; The Ministers will not pass from the Declinature, .... 148 The Judges, . . . - . .149 The Advocates defences for the Ministers, . . .150 Explanation of the word simpliciter ; In terloquitor, . .151 The Assize, . . • • • .152 Illegality; The Ministers filed by plurality; Six absolve them, 154 The sentence continued ; Remitted to prison, . .155 lxxviii TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1606. February. The Synods to meet all in one day ; The King craves answer to five Articles, . . . . ib. Synods reject them ; The French and Dutch Ministers at Lon don misinformed ; The Ministers Apology, . .156 Information against the Chancellor, . . .157 July. Parhament at Perth ; The Caveats refused to be insert in the Act of Parhament; Spottiswood preaches against the Discipline ; Galloway's preaching ; Ministers offer to prove the Caveats broken ; Cowper's preaching, . . ib. The Ministers Protestation; Three subscribers turn after wards Bishops ; The substance of the Protestation, . 159 The Lords of the Articles reject the Protestation ; Protesta tion in open Parhament, . . . . .162 Prelacies erected in temporal Lordships ; The Bishops ride, and their places ; Acts, ..... 163 The Earles and Lords clothed in scarlet, . . .164 The Second Stepp or Degree : The Constant Modera tion of Synods and Presbtteries, . . . ib. Eight Ministers called to London ; Dunbar's advice, . 165 August. The Ministers advice in their Presbyteries; Re ceive no commission ; Gladstanes treachery ; Gladstanes charged by his Presbytery, . . . .166 Sept. 22. The Ministers called before the King ; The King's speech ; Time to advise obtained, . . .167 Sept. 23. The Ministers second appearance ; The King's question ; The Bishops answer ; Mr Andrew Melvill's answer ; Mr James Melvill's, .... 168 Mr Andrew Melvill ; Mr William Scot ; Their overture ; Dismissed with applause ; Charged not to return to Scot land ; Called to the Chapel ; Questions put to the Minis ters ; Mr James Melvih's answer ; Supplication by the im prisoned Ministers ; Mi* Andrew Melvill, . . 169 The Ministers called before the Scots Council ; Articles given them in writt ; Mr James Melvill's answer ; Mr William Scot's answer, . . . . . .171 TABLE OF CONTENTS. lxxix 1606. Page. Their Grieves, and Advice how to pacifie the Troubles of the Kirk, ...... 176 Letters for a Convention at Linlithgow ; They supplicate to be dimitted ; Are enjoined to live severally at Bishops houses, ....... 177 Nov. Mr Andrew Melvill called before the Council; En joined; The imprisoned Ministers sentenced with banish ment ; Nov. 7, they embark at Leith ; Six Ministers banished, eight detained at London, eight lying in wards, 178 The tenor of the letter for the Convention at Linlithgow, . 179 Dec. Convention at Linlithgow ; Galloway's speech ; Mr James Nicolson, Moderator ; Philip, scribe ; Protestation intended, but crushed ; Resolution for repressing Papists ; Agent for the Presbyteries, . . . .180 Divisions among Ministers ; The King's intention and "decla ration, ....... 181 The Bishops Declaration, . . . . .182 Anent the banished Ministers ; The King's overture of Con stant Moderator ; Overture approven ; The number of the Convention, . . . . . .183 Admonition to peace ; Thanks to the Convention ; An extract refused ; Presbyteries urged with the Moderators ; The act refused ; Some accept, ..... 184 Synods urged with Moderators ; Refuse ; Scoone's madness ; Scoone takes instruments ; Synod takes instruments ; Act anent Moderators ; Letter to the Ministers in England ; Commissioners to Assembly ; Mr Row put to the horn, 185 1607. Synod of Fife discharged ; They meet on the sand ; Proro gation ; Act of Linlithgow produced ; The act not acknow ledged ; Members charged with horning to accept of Glad stanes [as] Moderator ; Their answers ; Gladstanes threat ened with excommunication ; Dykes and Scrymgeour con fined ; Cranstoun put to the horn, . . . 186 August and October. Moderators opposed by Synod of Lo thian ; Synod of Merse and Teviotdale ; Presbyteries lxxx TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1607. Page- charged to receave Moderators ; Two Ministers charged to prison, retire ; [Synod of] Angus accept the Moderator, 188 The act at Linlithgow ; Cautions of constant Moderators, . 189 April 26. Mr Andrew MelviU sent to the Tower ; The rest of the Ministers confined ; Mr William Cowper's Letter, . 194 The Assembly prorogat to Nov. 4. 1607; A meeting appointed August 1607 ; Mr James Nicolson's death ; Mr David Lindsay, ...... 195 Assembly prorogat to April 1608, . . .196 Assembly prorogat till July 1608 ; Mr John Murray warded, 197 Bishops visitations; May 1608, Law declined; The decliners put to the horn ; Confined, . . . .198 1608. May, ult. Letter anent the High Commissions ; The Bishops means of preparation for an Assembly ; Conference at Falkland ; Articles by the Ministers to the Bishops, . 199 The Bishops Articles, . . . . .200 Doctor Dounam's Sermon, .... 201 July. Assembly at Linlithgow ; Law Moderator ; Acts ; Causes of the growth of Popery, . . . 202 Commissioners called to an account ; Reasons for their conti nuance ; Protestation ; Commissioners chosen, . . 203 Distraction of affection; Difference in judgment ; Commission for removing differences, .... 204 Anent the banished and confined Ministers, . . 206 1609. January. Spottiswood's report ; Commissions to the Bishops, ib. Bishop of Galloway sent up to Court, . . . 207 Memorialls to be proponed to his Most Excellent Majes ty, [by the Bishops,] ib. May. Conference at Falkland ; Simson's Letter ; Ministers desire; Bishops answer ; Ministers reply ; Conclusion, . 211 Two things to be questioned ; The Ministers desire ; Bishops answer ; Ministers reply, . . . .213 Overture for peace ; Next Conference appointed ; Assembly prorogat, ....... 214 Anent the Conference, . . . . .215 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Ixxxi 1609. , Page. June. Bishops place ; Act in Bishops favors ; Bishops re stored ; Kirkmen's apparel, . . . .215 Nov. The King's letter to Edinburgh ; Christmas vacance ; Fairfoul confined ; Spottiswood a Lord of the Session, .217 1610. January. Habits of Apparel, .... 218 The Third Step : The power of the High Commission. February. The High Commission proclaimed ; The tenor of the Commission, . . . . . . ib. High Commission contrary to Act of Parhament, . .221 The Fourth Degree or Step : Ordination and Jurisdic tion tyed to them. June 6. Assembly ; Missives from the King ; Bishops letters, ib. Spottiswood Moderator ; A protestation interrupted ; Spottis wood's lie ; The word Presbytery rejected, . .223 Dunbar ; Manner of Commissions ; Many without Commis sion ; Money distribute, ..... 224 The Heads and Articles concerning the Discipline of the Kirk in all time coming. Acts ; Five negative, Seven non liquets, . . .225 Episcopal Visitation and Diocesan Synods equivalent, . 228 The Authors against keeping Diocesan Synods, . .229 Ministers Sermons against the Assembly ; Proclamation ratifying, ...... 231 October. Diocesan Synod; Opposition; Cowper; Procedure; Murder, . . . . . .232 Nov. Synod; Supplication, .... 233 Three Bishops consecrate ; More consecrated ; Dunbar's death ; Melvill's prophesy of Dunbar ; Popish Lords libe- rat ; Straiten warded ; Gladstanes's Letter, . . 234 1612. October. Parhament; Act of Assembly altered, . . 237 Cowper, Bishop of Galloway, .... 238 1614. Proclamation for Communion at Easter ; Spottiswood trans lated ; Malcolm challenged, . . . . ib. / lxxxii TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1615. Page. Sept. Law, Bishop of Glasgow ; Bannatyne, Bishop, . 239 Dec. Courts of Commission united, . . . ib. The Pretended Bishops, their Government, and the effects of it. 1616. June. Huntly warded; Huntly relaxed in England; Pro clamation, July, ..... 240 Assembly at Aberdeen, August; Spottiswood, Moderator; Constitution, ...... 241 Act against Papists ; Acts ; Many withdraw ; Spottiswood's Questions ; The King's guard ; Commissioners anent dila pidations ; Supplication to the King ; Spottiswood's addi tions, ....... 242 Huntly absolved ; Struthers commendation of the Assembly, 245 Organs in Chapel; Pictures; Kneeling, June 1617; Parlia ment ; Article anent the King's making of laws, . 246 Protestation ; The King informed ; Protestation presented but not read ; The King passes from it, 247 1617. June 27. Subscribers, . . . . .248 Simpson warded ; Calderwood with two more before the High Commission ; Calderwood's Answer ; Calderwood suspend ed ; His reasoning ; Calderwood deprived ; Warded, . 249 Some acknowledge a fault ; Preposterous order of Assembly, 251 Nov. Assembly at St Andrews ; Spottiswood against Mel vill ; Articles agreed ; Ramsay, . . . ib. Dec. Spottiswood preached [in support of] Festivals, . 253 1618. Jan. 26. The King's Letter ; Observations of Festivals, pro claimed, January 28, . . . . . ib. Feb. 16. Forbes of Corse's Letter; At Easter the Commu nion with kneeling, ..... 254 Kirks unite, . . . . . .255 The Fyve Articles. August. Assembly [at] Perth ; Spottiswood's Protestation in Sermon ; Their sitting ; Spottiswood, Moderator ; Clerk ; Nobles, Barons, without commission ; King's letter ; Spot tiswood's allegiance, ..... 256 TABLE OF CONTENTS. lxxxiii 1618. Page. Ministers require four things ; 1. Anent votes ; 2. Anent the Moderator ; 3. Anent the Articles ; 4. Private Conference by some of either side ; King's letter read ; Spottiswood ; Reasoning granted, . . . . .258 Kneeling ; Bishop Lindsay anent kneeling ; Articles given in, in write, ...... 261 The King's letter in write read ; Spottiswood's threats ; Order of voting ; State of the question ; Articles concluded ; Nul lity of Assembly, . . . . . .262 Articles to be subscribed by intrants, . . .265 October. Acts ratified by proclamation, . . .266 Ministers urged with obedience ; 1618, Christmas ; Easter, 1619; Galloway's letter to the King against Edinburgh; Hall, 267 1619. March. Mr Richard Dickson before the High Commission, 268 April. Another Minister before it ; Appellation; Mr Duncan cited ; Declines ; Mr Duncan's admonition, . .269 Nov. 13. Meeting at St Andrews ; The King's letter ; Spottiswood presseth obedience ; Carmichael's answer, . 270 1620. January and February. Ministers before the Commission, . 272: Scrimgeour before the High Commission ; His discourse, . 273 Scrimgeour's reasons against his sentence, . . 275 Scrimgeour's Protestation, .... 277 Merse Ministers before the Commission, . . .278 March 28. Commission at Glasgow ; Livingston before the High Commission ; Mr John Ferguson, . . ib. Their Declinature, ..... 279 April. Directions from the King anent citizens of Edinburgh, 280 Spottiswood's Diocesan Synod, . . . .281 June 19. The King's proclamation, . . . ib. May. Proclamation ; Supplication, . . . 282 [Marquis of] Hamilton, Commissioner, . . . 283 1621. July 22. Simpson's preaching; Called before the Council; Warded in Dumbarton ; Ministers charged off the town ; Informations left by the Ministers, . . .284 Protestation ; Mr David Barclay, presenter, . .292 lxxxiv TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1621. Page. Ministers denied access to the Parliament ; Hamilton's har- rangue ; Election of the Lords of Articles, . . 293 Articles ratified [by the Lords of] Articles, . . 294 Protestation affixed publicly ; Five Articles approven, . 295 Fire, thunder, darkness ; Hailstones, rain, . .297 August 20. Acts proclaimed ; The tempest renewed ; Pro testation ; The King's Letter, .... 298 October 10. Uniformity urged, . . . . ib. Spottiswood's alleged Letter ; Biggar before the Commission ; Mr John Murray ; Mr John Row, . . .299 Mr David Dickson, December the 6th; January 2, 1622, Dickson before the High Commission ; Declinature ; Dick son deprived and confined, • 300 Mr George Dunbar deprived and confined ; Declinature, . 302 George Johnston cited for not preaching at Yule ; seventy- three years old ; Deprived, .... 305 1622. October 23. Mr Duncan's Letter to Spottiswood, . . ib. Mr Robert Boyd of Trochrig ; Mr Andrew Ramsay, . 306 1623. January. Boyd displaced, . . . . . ib. 1624. March. Mr William Forbes's doctrine challenged by the people ; The Ministers offended at it, . . . 307 Forbes; Sydserf; Struthers, . . . .308 April. Diverse before the Council, . . . ib. June. Anent William Rigg's fine and confinement ; Others confined ; Discharge of Coventicles, . . . 309 August. A Proclamation for Communion at Christmas, . 311 Sept. Proclamation to choose conform Magistrates, . 312 Nov. The Pest in ane Yule Communion ; January 1625, William Rigg, . . . . . . ib. 1625. The King will have Communion at Easter ; March, The King's [James I.] death mars Easter Communion ; Dickson's remorse for kneeling ; The King's [Charles I.] Letter to Spottiswood, . . . . .313 Proclamation anent Conformity, .... 314 Sept. Direction to choose conform Magistrates, . . ib. Commissioners or Clergy sent to the King about Kirk Rents, 315 TABLE OF CONTENTS. IxXXV 1628. Presbyteries send some to meet with the Bishops, 1628 ; The Commissioners to Court ; Their charges, . .316 Mr Alexander Henderson ; Bishop of Ross, goeth alone to Court; Instructions for the Clergy, . . .317 Anent the Communion in Edinburgh, . . . 318 April. Supplication to the King, and complaint by the Ministers of Edinburgh, . . . .319 Instructions ; Sydserf subscribes them ; Ministers of Edin burgh; Grievances, 1630. July. Grievances, August. Grievances, 1633. May. Grievances, June. Supplication, 320 327 328330335 CEETAINE EECORDS TOUCHING THE ESTATE OF THE CHUECH OF SCOTLAND. THE FIRST BOOKE. CAP. I. — The happo: estate of the Church of Scotland, after the Reformation of Religion, . . . 345 CAP. H. — The first beginning of the decay in the govern ment AND JURISDICTION ecclesiastick, . . . 349 CAP. HI. — The kestauration of the Kirk to her wonted LIBERTTE IN THE TREWEST GOVERNMENT, . . . 351 CAP. TV. — The second break and beginning of the present decat op the libertre, jurisdiction and discd?line of the Keek of Scotland, ..... 354 CAP. V. — The indeavour of the Ktrk to preserve the dis cipline FROM THE CRED7ING IN [of] CORRUPTIONS, AND CON- TRATR DRESSINGS OF THE ADVERSARIES, . . • 359 lxxxvi TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. CAP. VT. — The pollicie used to induce the Kirk to allow DIVERS THINGS TENDING TO THE STRENGTHENING OF THE FOR MER COURSE AGAINST THE DISCIPLINE, . . • 363 CAP. VH. — The causes moving his Majestie, after his going to Ingland, to continue in his former purpose and pro jects TO ACCOMPLISH HIS DESIRE, .... 373 CAP. VIE. — Of the diligence and earnest endevours of the mlnistrie to preserve and matntaine the ld3ertie of their Assemblie, against the pollicds and craft of the Bischops and Commissioners, ... . 378 CAP. IX. — The constant going on of Counsell and Commis sioners IN THE INTENDn PURPOSE, .... 383 CAP. X. — Of the Assemblie haulden, and proceidings therof, ....... 386 CAP. XI. — A short note of the calumnies uttered in the foresaid Declaration against these Ministers for their MEITTING AT AbERDENE, . . . . .397 THE SECOND BOOKE. CAP. I. — Touching the imprissonment of the SEx Ministers committed to the Castell of Blacknes, . . . 401 CAP. H. — The second bringing of the Ministers that were imprisoned in Blacknes before the Counsell, and inde- vour of the Counsell bt interhogatours to intrappe them, and bring them within the compasse of a law ; and the Ministers answers, ...... 409 CAP. HI. — The Declaration of the Ministers proceidings, for clearing of their own innocencie, and appeasing of his majestie's wraitn, sent by tiiem to his majestie, . 417 TABLE OF CONTENTS. IxXXvii Page. CAP. IV. — The pollicie of the Counsell to cover their wrong and imprissonment of the remanent Ministers, . 419 CAP. V. — The conclusion taken at Londoun, and execution therof on the Counsell's pairt, in the proces led against the Ministers, the 24th of October, at Edinburgh, . 425 CAP. VI. — The favourable answering of Mr Gilbert Beoun his complaint, the releasing of Mr Henry Bltth out of prison, and particular dealling with the Minis ters to bring them to a confession, . . .436 CAP. VET. — Certatne petitions given to the Counsell in favours of the imprisoned ministers. — Their letter to the Presbitrie of Edinburgh for clearing of their inno cence:. — Two Petitions sent to the King, one from the Presbyterie of Edinburgh, and another from the impri soned Ministers with other petitions to the Councell, and further secret purposes against the Ministers in Blacknes, ....... 439 CAP. VlLL — Of the convoying of the Ministers from Blacknes to Linlithgow, and the dealing with them be fore THEIR ARRAIGNMENT, ..... 455 CAP. IX. — The arraignment of the Ministers before the Lord Justice, with such proceedings as happened before the calling of the jurie, ..... 463 CAP. X. — The jurie is called, the exhortation made to THEM, AND THEIR PROCEEDINGS, , 476 CAP. XI. — The things that followed upon this process of CONVICTION, AND OF THE PUBLISHING OF THE CALLUMNIOUS BOOK OF " DECLARATION*' SO OFTEN MENTIONED BEFORE, TO GETHER WITH SOME GRIEl'ES OF THE MINISTERS OF LOTHIAN AND TEVIDALE, &C, . . . . • .107 lxxxviii TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. CAP. XH. — Letters sent from the preachers of the French and Flemish churches at London, to the Ministers of Edenburgh, with an answer thereto from the imprisoned Ministers, and another letter sent from them bt Mr Wh.- liam Irrving, servant to the King's Majestie, . . 524 CAP. XTTT. — Some Ministers sent foe bt his Majestie. — The General Assembly still shotted. — A petition sent by the waeded Ministers, and a protestation by some other Minis ters to the Parliament of Perth, but not presented. — Some articles penned by them. — What maters were con cluded at the Parliament of Perth. — A petition sent from the warded Ministers to the King, and a letter to their brethren going to Court, .... 552 CAP. XIV. — The copie of his Majestie's letter to the COUNCELL OF SCOTLAND, CONCERNING THE SENTENCE TO BE PRO NOUNCED AGAINST THE IMPRISONED MINISTERS, . .556 It is stated at page Iii. that Mr John Forbes had three sons, John, Arthur and Patrick. From Livingston's Memorable Characteristics it appears that Forbes had another son, James, minister at Abercorn. Livingston classes him among " the faith ful and able ministers of Christ in the Church of Scotland of his acquaintance," and describes him as " an able and zealous preacher, who after every sermon behoved to change his shirt, he spoke with such vehemency and sweating. Every year he gave the communion four times." APOLOGETICAL NARRATION OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK OF SCOTLAND, BY MR WILLIAM SCOT, MINISTER OF CUPAR. APOLOGETICAL NARRATION OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK OF SCOTLAND. When the light of the Gospell was striveing with the darknesse of Poperie, within this realme, at the breaking up of Eeformation, so many particular kirks as were reformed were governed accord ing to the Order sett downe in the book, prefixed to the Psalms in meeter; which is called, in the First Book of Discipline, "The Book of Common Order," and, in the Acts of the Assemblies, " The Order of Geneva," that is, of the Inglish congregation at Geneva, where Mr Knox had been some tyme minister. We have there the forme of election of pastors, elders and deacons, of the admi nistration of the sacraments, and solemnization of marriages, which continued after till the declining of our Kirk. The election and admission of superintendents, some prayers for extraordinary occa sions, the treatise of fasting and excommunication were added after ward. Ministers were directed by acts of the Generall Assembly observe that order in celebration of the sacraments and solemniza tion of marriage. In this book there are only four sorts of Office-bearers acknow ledged as warrantable by the Word of God: to wit, of pastors, doctors, elders, and deacons. Because the book is obvious to every man, I need not to discourse upon every head. Only let the reader be advertised, that that learned and judicious divine Mr Cart- 4 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION wright, in his first reply to Doctor Whitgift, hath these words: " Although the Inglish church at Geneva had that," to wit, fune ral! sermons, " in their Book of Common Prayer, yet, as I have heard of those that were there present, it was not so used." The reasons alledged in the First Book of Discipline are so forcible to prove the inconveniences of funerall sermons, that there needeth no further doubt to be made of the matter. The short Confession of Faith prefixed befor that book was the first Confession which was approved by our Kirk. OF SUPERINTENDENTS, AND THE FIRST BOOK OF DISCIPLINE. So soon as the light prevailled over darknesse, a Parliament was hplden in August 1560, for the establishing of religion and the suppressing of Poprie. At this Parliament, the Confession of Faith, which is extant among the Acts, was ratified, and again anno 1567. After the dissolving of the Parliament, consultation was had at the direction of the counsell concerning the policie and govern ment of the Kirk. It was committed to Mr Knox, Mr John Win- ram, Mr John Eow, Mr John Spotiswood, John Willock and Mr John Douglas, rector of the University at Saint Andrews, to draw up the heads of the Policie, as they had done of the Doctrine. When the Book was presented unto the Lords some wished it were rati fied by Parliament ; others, in mockage, called it a " devout ima gination;" the licentious perceaved their carnall liberty was to be restrained, if the discipline prescribed in the book were established; such as had gripped greedily to the church rents considered that their commoditie was much to be impaired, if so much were be stowed upon the ministery, the schoolls, and the poor, as was modified by that Book; yet it was subscribed by sundry, and rati fied by Act of Counsell upon the 17th day of January next fol lowing, with provision that the bishops, abbotts, priors, and other prelats and beneficed men, who had joyned themselves to the Eeformed Kirk, within this realme, be suffered to possesse their OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 5 benefices during their lifetime, so that the ministery within their prelacies be provided according to the modification of that book spread abroad. This Book was not intended to be strictly observed in all tyme coming in every point, but liberty was reserved to the posterity to devise and establish a more perfect, as we may see in the History of the Kirk, pag. 546. That which was alterable and temporary may be discerned from the rest, which is of perpetuall use, by some reason or respect alledged in the book. For somthings were devi sed for the state of this Kirk in her infancie, and as it were inforced upon them by necessity ; the policie of the Kirk being so defaced befor in the tyme of Poprie, that it could not be repaired at the first. Because the harvest was great and the labourers few, they appointed superintendents, exhorters, and readers. They allow in churches, where no ministers could be had for the present, men that could read distinctly the Common Prayers and the Scriptures, but permitt them not to administer the sacraments, unlesse, by pro- cesse of tym, they grow able to deliver wholsome doctrine ; and yet not befor they be admitted. So they allowed no reading minis ters. The exercise of exhorting and explaining the Scriptures, they permitted to some readers, that had any abilitie, to traine them up for the ministry. If, after two years, readers were not found to grow up to that abilitie, they thought it good they be removed and ly not as a burden upon the Kirk. They requyr no bishops to be placed in the diocesse of the old Popish bishops, which they would have done, if they had thought that the office of a bishop was an ordinary and perpetual office in the Kirk instituted by Christ or his Apostles ; but without reguard to the limits of the old diocesses they divide the whole countrey in ten parts, which they call diocies or provinces, and requyre that super intendents be appointed to travell through them, that the whole countrey may be watered with the preaching of the word. To these, charge was given to plant and erect kirks within their bounds. They confesse they were forced to make this difference of ministers through necessity, not that they thought the office of a superintend- 6 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION ent is any of the ordinary offices which the Lord hath appointed ; which is clear by these words : " We thought good to signifie to your Honours such reasons as moved us to make difference be twixt preachers at this tyme." And again, " We thought it a thing most expedient at this time." Their chief reason was, lest the great est part of the realme should be left destitute, if the few preachers they had were all settled in particular kirks. They intended to have had a superintendent for every province ; yet, because their travelling throw their bounds was chargeable, they could not at- taine to moe then five : Mr John Spotiswood for Lothian, Mr John Willock for Glasgow and the West, Mr John Carswell for Argyle and the Isles, Mr John Winrame for Fife, John Erskin Laird of Dunne for Angus and Mearns. Howbeit the office of .those Superintendents was afterward abolished, as was the office of Bishops, I will shew the differences betwixt them and our pretended Bishops who claime to them as their predecessors. 1. The Superintendents must travell through their province, preach thrice in the week, not staying twenty dayes in one place, nor in the chiefe place of their residence above three or four months at the most, but must re-enter in visitation of the rest of the kirks of their bounds. This course they must keep till the kirks be provided of ministers, at least of readers. So their charge stood more in preaching then in governing. Our Bishops teach scarce once in the week in their cathedrall kirk, some scarce once in a quarter. 2. They * crave, that when any superintendent shall be deposed, or depart this life, that not only the eldership, magistrats and coun sell of the chief towns nominat two or three of the most learned of the ministery, but also that all the kirks within the bounds have liberty to nominat such as they shall think worthy to stand in elec tion ; that, after nomination, edicts be set forth, that such as could object against the persons nominat might be warned to be present, » " They, " that is, the Reformed Kirk craves. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 7 in the chief town, at the day appointed for that effect ; that the ministery of the province, with three or four superintendents nixt adjacent, do try their learning, manners, wisdome and ability to govern ; that he who shall be found most worthy may be burdened with the charge; that the examination be publict; that the voters be charged, in the name of God, to vote according to their con sciences; that the ministers of the province bring with them the votes of the people committed to their care, that the election may be the more free ; that the gentlemen and burgesses of the diocie be made privie to the election, that he may be the better beloved being chosen by themselves. In the election and admission of Mr John Spotiswood, Superintendent of Lothian, warning was given to earles, lords, barons, gentlemen and others, that had or might claime vote in election, as ye may see in our Psalme Books. 3. How the Bishops enter to their usurped or pretended office, ye shall see in the owne place. And yet in this book they * grant that at the first tyme, the nomination, examination and admis sion of the superintendent could not be so strict as they wold have it, and, afterward it must be. Other ceremonies then sharp examination and approbation of the ministers and superintend ents, with the publict consent of the elders and people, they can not allow to the admission of a superintendent. Bishops must be consecrat by the metropolitan, and other three bishops at least must be present. A simple minister might admitt a superintend ent. Mr John Knox admitted Mr John Spotiswood. The super intendent by that book must be subject to the censure and correc tion of elders and ministers, not of his chief towne only, but also of his whole province. What obedience Mr Spotiswood promised at his admission, ye may read in the Book of Common Order. The proud prelatf, his son, saith, he will not be subject to such a crue. If the ministers and elders of the chief town and province be negli gent in correcting the superintendent, when his offence is knowne, * See Note to the page 6. t John Spotiswood, Archbishop of St Andrews. 8 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION the nixt one or two superintendents, with their ministers and elders, may conveen him in some part of his province befor them, and cor rect him. Ye see how carefull they were to keep him in order, when there was no appearance as yet of tyrrany or misbehaviour. By this book, every congregation hath liberty to chuse their owne mi nister. The person chosen must compeir befor men of soundest judgment, remaining in the chief reformed citty or towne, nixt adjacent, which was the readiest mean could be devised at that tyme. He must interpret some place of Scripture appointed by the ministery, and be examined by them in all the controverted heads of religion, and that publictly, and thereafter sent to the congrega tion where he is to serve, that he may give a prooff of his gifts and soundnesse in religion by sundry sermons. His examination then was not committed to the superintendents alone, or to such as pleased him to appoint, but to some learned ministers. Imposition of hands they think it not necessary: now it is urged as necessary, but none other necessary but of the bishops hands. Others then superintendents might admitt ministers. Mr John Knox admitted not only the superintendent, but also Mr James Lawson, ta the ministery in Edinburgh. Ei the head of order and discipline to be taken with publict offenders, no mention is made of superintend ents, but of ministers and elders ; and in their visitation, they are ordained to note such crymes as be heinous, that by the censures of the Kirk^the offenders may be corrected. 4. In the head of superintendents we have no degrees of supe- riour and inferior, provinciall and generall superintendents, but all are made equall in rank and degree : but bishops are subordinat to archbishops, primats and patriarchs. Bishops, in respect of their barronies, have vote in Parhament. They allow no barronies, but stipends upon superintendents, and, therefor, they could have no place to vote in Parliament. No minister, according to this book, must be one of the King's Counsell, be he judged never so apt for the purpose ; but he must either cease from the ministery, which, at his pleasur, he may not do, or else cease from bearing charge in civil affairs, unlesse it be to assist the Parliament, if he be called, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 9 they mean to assist with advice, or to answer doubts out of God's word ; otherwayes, if they had thought the ministery should be the third estat, they wold have allowed them also place to vote, and sit as judges. Mr John Knox, in his exhortation to Ingland, dated at Geneva, 12th January 1559 yeares, hath these words : " Let none that be appointed to labour in Christ's vineyard be intangled in civil affairs, or, as ye call them, the affairs of the realme, except it be when the civil magistrat and the minister of the word assemble together for the execution of discipline, which is a thing easie to be done, without withdrawing any person from his charge ; for, as touching their coming yearly to Parliament for matters of religion, it shall be superfluous and vain, if God's true religion be once so established, that after it never be called in question or controversie." In this book they requyre a lawfull minister to administer the sacraments ; doctrine to preceed the ministration ; sitting at the Lord's Table ; distribution and dividing be the communicants ; abbeyes, munkeries, frieries, nunries, chappells, chanteries, cathe- drall kirks, canonries, colledges, other then were for the present parish kirks, to be utterly overthrowne, except only palaces, man sions and dwelling places adjacent, with their orchairds or yards ; free election of ministers ; their admission in presence of the peo ple ; the whole revenue of the temporality of bishops, deans and archdeans, lands, and all the rents of lands pertaining to cathedrall kirks to be bestowed upon the mantainance of universities and superintendents; that baptisme be administred upon the Lord's Day, or on the week dayes after sermon. They condemne observ ing of fasting and festivall days, violent intrusion of a minister up on any congregation, a reading minister, secret joining in marriage, funerall sermons, communicating at Easter, and sundry other things, as the reader may easily observe. Whereas, in the Confession of Faith, article 20, they think no policie nor order in ceremonies can be appointed for all ages, tymes and places, and that ceremonies invented by man ought to be changed, when they foster superstition rather then edify the Kirk, their meaning may be explained by their words in this book, in the 10 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION head of policie, where they distinguish betwixt things necessarie to be observed in every kirk, and things variable to be ordered by every congregation, and allow every particular kirk to have a par ticular policie of their own, without prejudice of the common and generall, as, whither to have sermon this or that day of the week, or how many in the week. Ceremonies for good order and com- linesse they allow, but what is that to sacred rites, which are pro perly called ceremonies. THE FIRST COURSE OF GOVERNMENT BT SUPERINTENDENTS AND COMMISSIONERS FOR PROVINCES. The chief government of our Kirk, since the Eeformation, was in power of Assemblies. We have had four sorts of Assemblies, Na- tionall, which were commonly called Generall Assemblies ; Provin cial!, which were commonly called by the generall name of Synods ; Presbyteries, that is, classical! meetings of a number of ministers within such a precinct ; and the Eldership of every particular con gregation. But the presbitries or classical! meetings could not be constitut for discipline and government at the first, because of the rarity of ministers ; yet we had weekly meetings of ministers, and others aiming at the ministry, for the exercise of prophesieing from the very beginning. The different and variable courses, therefore, was not in the government by assemblies, but in the office-bearers, sometimes ministers having preheminence, lesse or more, above the rest of their brethren ; and, for a long time, ministers, all equal in power, governing jointly in presbitries, without acknowledging any superior but synod or Generall Assemblies. The first course, to wit, of Superintendents and Commissioners, continued till January 1572. When they could not attain to moe superintendents then the five above named, they gave the commis sion to other ministers to preach in the bounds or provinces alloted to them, to plant kirks, to visit kirks, schoolls, colledges, to suspend, deprive, transplant ministers, to conferr vacant benefices, to procure the eradication of all monuments of idolatry. These were called the OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 11 commissioners for planting of kirks, commissionars of, or rather for or to countreyes or provinces, commissioners for visitation. They had the same power that the superintendents had, but that it en dured no longer but a year, unlesse it pleased the General Assemblie to continue their commission ; so that we may justly call them tem- porarie superintendents, and the superintendents durable, or con stant commissioners, both having a deligat power from the Assem blie, limited by the Book of Discipline and acts of Assemblies ; and, therefor, in many acts, under the name of superintendents, are comprehended these commissioners. These superintendents durst not take upon them to sit in an High Commission over their bre thren, nor do any thing in matters ecclesiasticall without the con sent of the Kirk. These Superintendents were tryed at every Generall Assemblie, which then were holden twice in the year, where, after they were removed, any that pleased gave complaint or information against them : but we have no sett nor free assemblies to try and censure our pretended bishops, who do what they list without any control- ment. The superintendents, especially of Fife and Angus, were delated to the Assemblie for slackness in visiting their kirks, negli gence in preaching, admitting of unqualified men, who had been sometime Papish priests, and young men to the ministery without due tryall, according to the Book of Discipline ; that they were much given to worldly bussinesse ; that ministers resorted not to the weekly meeting for exercise of prophesieing. Ministers were appointed now and then to assist them in preaching, and yet they desired to be disburdened of their office, which is a token that it was not of divine institution, but by humane appointment, and might be laid aside without deposition, at the will and pleasur of the As semblie. So the countrey was watered with the preaching of the word, not only by superintendents, but also by other ministers and commissioners. Mr John Knox his ministry did more good then all the superintendents. It was ordained in the Assembly, June 1562, that the examination of such as were to be established in the ministery should be in presence of the superintendent and best re- 12 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION formed kirk nearest the place where he is to be established, provyd- ing alwayes, that the judgment of best learned who shall be pre sent, be sought, in the examination and admission, and that he who shall be so receaved, shall not be removed but according to the Book of Discipline. Here ye see that the Book of Discipline is to be observed as the rule for removall of ministers. In December 1562, it was ordained that all persons serving in the ministery, as well such as was called bishops, as others, as also exhorters and readers, who have not entered to their charges, according to the fourth head of the Book of Discipline, desist till they be orderly entered. By this Assemblie, it was ordained that the synods be holden twice in the year, to wit, in April and October ; that the superintendent give sufficient advertisement of tyme or place to the particular kirks, that the minister, with an elder or deacon, may repair to the place. By the same Assemblie, ministers ought not to be transplanted without consent of the most part of the ministers and elders present at the synod. La June 1563 it was ordained, that if any person found himselfe wronged by any sen tence given forth by the session of any particular kirk, he be per mitted to appeall to the superintendent and the synod, and, if yet wronged, from them to the Generall Assemblie, from which it shall not be lawfull to him to appeal. So the superintendent alone was not judge of an appellation for a wrong alledged committed by the session or eldership of a particular kirk. E any wrong was done by the superintendent and the synod, remedy might be had by appella tion to the Generall Assemblie. But now no remedy can be had, whatsoever wrong we receave from the prelat's. hands ; for we have no ordinary Assemblies and extraordinary, but when it pleaseth them, and where they may be masters themselves, which also are very rare. Commission was granted by this Assemblie to Christo pher Goodman minister at St Andrews, William Christison minis ter at Dundie, Mr John Douglas rector of the Universitie of Saint Andrews, Mr William Cock and Mr William Scot, to take cognition of the complaint given in by the Superintendent of Fife, against Mr George Lesly, minister of Stremiglo, to decide therein, and to no- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 13 tifie their sentence and decreet to the Superintendent of Angus. Here ye see rmnisters appointed to be judges of the complaint of a superintendent. In December 1564, because of the common report, that many ignorants and of bad conversation were admitted to be ministers, exhorters, readers, the Superintendents of Angus, Lothian and the West, were ordained to visit certain bounds allotted to them, other then their owne ; and Mr Knox to visit the kirks of Fife, ¦Strathern, Gowrie, and Monteith, to try, suspend, depose as they shall find cause. But who admitted those ignorants or scandalous persons, but superintendents and commissioners for visitation of kirks ? In December 1565, it was ordained that the superintendent call the disobedient minister, exhorter, reader, befor himselfe and some of the nearest discreet ministers ; and if, being convict of dis obedience, he refuse to satisfie according to their injunctions, that he be suspended from his ministerie and stipend till the next Assem blie, that he may be further censured or restored to his former estate, according to the evidence of his repentance. Here, ye see, the su perintendent might not so much as suspend a disobedient reader, let be a minister, without associating to himselfe some of the nearest discreet ministers. Presbitries were not as yet constitut, yet they went as near as they could. By this Assemblie, the superintendent was tyed to the advice of the nixt reformed kirk in decerning the excommunication of adulterers, murtherers, &c. This is meant if there be not a reformed kirk, that is, a kirk having an eldership established, where the crime is committed : otherways a reformed kirk without the superintendent might excommunicat, as ye may see in the Treatise of Excommunication added to the Book of Com mon Order. In this Assemblie, the Superintendent of Fife his complaint was tryed by others then superintendents. In Decem ber 1567, Mr John Craig, David Lindsay, George Buchanan, or any two of them, were appointed to direct their edicts to the kirks, which were wyder then the Superintendent of Fife his charge, that the ministers and elders might compear at Couper the 22d of Ja nuary, with their complaints against the said superintendent, and 14 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION to try and report to the nixt Assemblie, which they did to the As semblie holden in July 1568. The Treatise of Excommunication, after it was revised by some appointed to that effect, was approved by that Assemblie, wherin the reader shall often find mention made of the ministery, session and kirk, but of superintendents only where there is no reformed kirk ; and wher there is mention made of superintendents, there is also mention made of assessors joined with them. No excommunication is to be found there by bishops officials. Ei July 1569, we find that the Superintendent of Angus being appointed by the last Assemblie commissionar to visit the shireffdoms of Aberdeen and Bamff, deprived the principali and regents of the Colledge of Old Aberdeen, not allone, but with the advice, counsell and consent of the ministers and commissioners of the kirks within the bounds. In July 1570, when it was asked, at such as were appointed by the Assemblie to decide questions, What is the jurisdiction of a superintendent, and how farr it is extended? the answer was remitted to the Book of Discipline. El March 1571, (or, according to the old accompt, 1570,) it was asked at such as were appointed to decide questions, Whether the superintendent might take up particular delations in their chief kirk, where ther is good order, execution of discipline, and a weeklie assemblie of ministers and elders for this ? and it was answered, That it was thought good for avoiding corruption and partiality, that he have some of the elders with him. It was asked, E any person or persons in a re formed parish or city, where order and discipline is observed, may be compelled to answer befor their superintendent in prima instantia, the matter not being tryed befor their own particular assemblie, their immediat judge ? It was answered, Ordains the order of the Book of Discipline to be observed herein, wherunto the superin tendents are subject. The Eeader, then, may gather by these acts and orders, together with the differences I have observed befor out of the Book of Dis cipline, what power the Superintendents had, and what odds ther is betwixt them and our usurping Bishops. The hearts of professors were in the begining so ravished with the clear light of the gospell, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 15 that there was no fear of tyrannie ; yet, be processe of tyme, the office wold have brought forth as bad effects as it did in Ger many, whereof Gualter complaineth in his Homilies upon Luke, (Homil. 132.) During this course we had no bishops, but only three Popish bishops, who professed reformed religion, and, therefore, were suf fered to bruik their rents, but without prejudice of the stipends alloted to ministers ; to wit, the bishops of Galloway, Orknay and Cathnesse. They had no power to exerce jurisdiction by virtue of their old episcopall office ; and therfor, in the register of the Assem blie, are designed by a note of degradation, as it were, " called or intituled Bishop ;" nor might take upon them to be superintendents, but according to the order set down in the Book of Discipline, nor of commissioners, but at the appointment of the Generall Assemblie ; and, therefor, when Mr Alexander Gordon, bishop of Galloway, was seeking to be superintendent of Galloway, the Assemblie holden in June 1562 would not acknowledge him for superintendent of Galloway, because he had not observed the order prescribed in the Book of Discipline, nor admit him, unless they understood that the kirks of Galloway sought him to be their superintendent, and till he subscribed the Book of Discipline. In December following, for planting of kirks in the sheriffdome of Dumfreis and the rest of the West, the Assemblie put in leits the said Mr Alexander and Mr Eobert Pont, minister then at Dunkelden, ordained edicts to be set forth for the admission of one of them to the superintend- entship upon the last Sabbath of Aprile, and appointed the super intendent of Glasgow, Mr Knox, Mr Eobert Hamiltoun minister, and others to be present at the inauguration in the kirk of Dum fries. In the mean tyme they give him the power of a commissioner in Galloway. Mr Knox went after to Dumfreis, where he found that Mr Alexander had corrupted the most part of the gentle men, had induced them not only to nominat him, but also to elect him ; whereupon Mr Knox delayed the action, and left Mr Eobert Pont with the Maister of Maxwell, that his doctrine and conver sation might be knowne. So, Mr Alexander was disappointed at 16 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION that tyme, howbeit then familiar with Mr Knox, and often at his table. In June 1563, commission was given to the bishops of Galloway, Orknay and Cathnesse, to visit their owne bounds, plant ministers, &c. as other commissioners did. They were more able to bear the charges then stipendiarie ministers : otherwayes many were fitter. They had been so enured to abuses in their old government, that they could not carry themselves dutifully as commissioners. Com plaints were made upon them, when they wer in office. La December 1564, when the Superintendents of Lothian and Angus, the Com missioners of Galloway and Orkney, wer removed to be tryed, some brethren desired, that it might be demanded of the Commissioners of Galloway and Orknay, Whither, with a safe conscience, they might exerce both the office of a Superintendent and the office of a Lord of the Session ? where, by the way, ye may see, Commissioners were in effect superintendents, and might be so called during their commission. They wer both delated in December 1567 ; Galloway for not visiting kirks, for haunting the court too much, for procuring to be one of the Senators of the Colledge of Justice, and of the Privie Counsell, for resigning Inchafray in favours of a young child, getting lands in few in prejudice of the kirk ; Adam, called Bishop of Orknay, for negligence in visitation, bestowing of bene fices upon Frances Bothuell, a Papist, and placeing him in the ministery, for occupying of the room of a Judge of the Session, for solemnizing the marriage between the Queen and the Earle of Bothuell, contrarie to an act made against the marriage of the divorced adulterer, till the Assemblie were satisfied for the scandall. In Jidy 1568, the Commissioner of Galloway, Mr Alexander Gordon, was injoyned to come to Edinburgh at the tyme of the nixt Parhament, and to shew his diligence in the charge committed to him in that province, and to answer whether he will wait upon court and counsell, or upon preaching of the word and planting of kirks. The Superintendents of Fife, Angus, Lothian, were ap pointed to report his answer to the nixt Assemblie. In the mean- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 17 tyme, Mr John Eow, minister at Perth, was appointed to visit Galloway. The Bishop of Orknay was restored again to the ministerie, and enjoined to confesse his offence in the kirk of Holi- rood House, for solemnizeing the marriage betwixt the Queen and the Earle of Bothuell. Ea July 1569, the Superintendent of the Isles was rebuked for accepting the bishoprick of the Isles without acquanting the Assembly, and for ryding at and assisting of the Parhament, holden by the Queen's faction for the Queen, after the murther of the King. Mr Alexander Gordon was enjoined to come to the nixt Assembly, and inhibited to exercise any function in the Kirk, conforme to the act made against him in July 1568, by which he was discharged to excercise the office of a commissioner in Gal loway, or to lift up the Thirds which he had for that office, in caise he compeared not befor the last session of the Assembly. But I find nothing of his compearance at the nixt Assembly. In Fe bruary 1570, sundry things were laid to the Bishop of Orkney's charge, and, amongst the rest, that he had desisted from preaching, and sat as a judge in the Session, and styled himself with a Eoman title, " Eeverend Father in God," which belongeth to no minister. The first he thought had been warrantable ; for the second, he de- nyed that he delighted in any such style, or craved any such arro gant title. This much for these who were called Bishops, only be cause they had been Bishops in tyme of Poprie, and still bruiked the Bishopricks, but were not bishops in office, but only commis sioners at the appointment and during the pleasur of the Assemblie; and yet ye see how they carry themselves, notwithstanding of their joining to the Eeformed Kirk, and how they wold have behaved themselves if the General Assembly had not had authority over them. The Generall Assemblies were not moderated by superintendents, but by such as were freely chosen, whether minister or superin tendent. Master John Eow, Mr David Lindsay, Mr John Craig, and Mr William Christison, Mr Eobert Pont, Mr George Hay, Mr Gilbert Garden, all ministers, were chosen to moderat as well as superintendents, but not one of those who had been bishops of old had the credit to be chosen during all this tyme. The Gene- 18 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION rail Assembly mett often upon the 25th of December, so ministers wer not then tyed to stay at home to make a sermon upon Christ's nativity that day. Be an act made in July 1568, such only wer to have place to vote in the General Assemblie: to wit, superin tendents and commissioners appointed for visiting of the kirks, ministers and commissioners of shires, chosen at the Synod with consent of the rest of the ministers and gentlemen conveened at the Synod, commissioners of burghs chosen with consent of the coun sell and kirk of the burgh, and commissioners of universities. It was ordained that none be admitted without their commission in write, and that the same persons be not continually chosen, lest the power of the Assemblies rest only upon them, but that they be changed from Assembly to Assembly. When Presbytries wer erected this sort of election was somewhat altered. The end of thir [the Assembly's] meetings was not only to make canons and constitutions, but also to try superintendents and commissioners for planting of kirks, receaving of heinous offenders, after evidence of their repentance, to consult upon references, receaving petitions, delations, appellations, to appoint some to decide questions, to ap point commissioners to present their petitions to the Parhament, generally to do all things that were requisit for the welfare of the whole Kirk in generall. These Assemblies were of such importance, that when Secretarie Lethingtoune and other Court Lords made a quarrell in December, anno 1562, about holding Assemblies without the Queen's allowance, it was answered, Shee understood that ther was a reformed Kirk within this realme ; that they had their owne orders and appointed tymes for meeting ; take from them the free- dome of Assemblies and take from them the Evangell, for without Assemblies how shall good order and unity in doctrine be pre served ; it is needfull that by the authority, judgment, and gravitie of many, the errors and follies of a few be repressed. As the ministers did grow in number, and the Synods become more frequent, the Generall Assemblie disburdened themselves of some bussinesse, and committed them to Synods^ Adulterers, murtherers, incestuous persons, and others, convicted of heinous OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 19 crimes, presented themselves to the Generall Assembly to receave their injunctions, and at the next Assembly they presented them selves again in their linen cloaths, &c. to be receaved. But in March 1570, these penitents wer ordained to compear befor the Synods to the same end. Whereas questions proponed by ministers wer heard in the Generall Assembly, or decided by such as the Assemblie appointed to meet together for that effect, it was or dained by this Assemblie that all questions be proponed thereafter to Synods ; and, what is too hard or cannot be solved, that that only be proponed to the Generall Assembly. By an act made in December 1564, if the Assemblie had not leasur to answer to ane question before their dissolving, the decision was to be referred to the Superintendent of the bounds wher the question arose, and such a number of ministers as he should choose to assist him, and their reasons were to be reported in writ to the nixt Assembly ; but by this latter act the question was to be decided by the Synod. So to search out the power of superintendents, we should look to the pos terior acts, and not to the anterior, which were abrogated by pos terior. The worship of God was preserved all this time in purity by our Generall Assemblies. When the latter Confession of Helvetia was approved by the Assembly holden in December 1566, they ordained that a note be sett in the margine, at the printing, wher ther is mention made of the same five dayes which are now urged upon us. So they approve that Confession of Faith, but with the excep tion of Holy dayes. The same Assemblie directed a letter to be sent to the Bishops of Lagland in favours of their brethren troubled for cornered capp, tippit, and surplice; where they shewed their detes tation of such baggage. Some were appointed by this Assembly to revise the Answer made by Mr William Eamsay, one of the mas ters of Sainct Salvator's Colledge, to Bullinger's Treatise touching the Apparrell of Preachers in England. Often did the Assemblies crave, by their commissioners, from the Lords of Counsell and Estates of Parliament, a consultation upon the causes belonging to the jurisdiction of the Kirk, that they might be b2 20 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION separated from the civil, and so the marches ridd betwixt the civil and ecclesiasticall judicatories. Some were appointed by the Par liament 1567, to conferrwith the commissioners of the Kirk, but I find no effect nor conclusion as yet. THE SECOND COURSE : OF BISHOPS, SUPERINTENDENTS, AND COM MISSIONERS FOR PROVINCES. Mathew, Earle of Lennox, holding a Parhament in Stirling in August 1571, when the Queen's faction possessed the castle and towne of Edinburgh, the Superintendent of Fife inhibited Mr John Douglas, rector of the University of St Andrews, who was pre sented a litle befor to the Bishoprick of Saint Andrews by the Earl of Morton, to vote in that Parliament in name of the Kirk, till he be admitted and allowed by the Kirk, under the pain of excommu nication. The Earl of Morton commanded him to vote as the Bishop of Saint Andrews, under the pain of treason. The Eegent was killed. Befor the dissolving, John, Earle of Marr, was chosen Ee gent. About the begining of November, the collectors of the Kirk were discharged by letters proclaimed at St Andrews to gather the Thirds, because, as was alledged, ministers stipends were not payed, nor that superplus which was alloted for the King's House out of the Thirds. But it was thought that these letters were raised at the instance of the Earle of Morton, whom Mr John Douglas had informed, by letter, that the collector wold not suffer him to uplift certain dueties belonging to the bishoprick. The Superintendent of Angus, in a prolix letter to his chiefe, the Ee gent, complained of the inhibition, that nothing be answered to the collectors of the Kirk, that benefices are conferred and bishops sett up without advice and consent of the Kirk. La another letter he complaiheth of the great misorder at the last Parhament, in creat ing bishops, placeing them, and giving them vote in Parhament as bishops, in despight of the Kirk, and high contempt of God; the Kirk opponeing itself against that misorder, seeing the Kirk hath the power of examination and admission of men to spirituall [offices,] and OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 21 benefices of spiritual! cure, whither bishopricks or inferior benefices. Lest it should seeme that ministers, out of avarice and ambition, sought the possession of great benefices, he letteth his Grace under stand, that the Kirk hath continually suited, in their articles con sented to, and subscribed by the most part of the nobilitie, that when any benefices vaiked, having many kirks joined thereto, that all the kirks should be divided and severally to severall men to serve, every one at his own kirk; in which mind all that bear office in the Kirk doe continue. If the dismembering of great benefices cannot be granted at this tyme, he doubteth not but the Kirk will consent — that the benefices and offices joined thereto, being conferred ac cording to the order befor mentioned — to assigne such portion as may be spared, above the reasonable sustentation of the ministrie of the kirks of such benefices, to the maintainance of the King's House and common affairs, till farther order be taken in these mat ters. The Eegent answered that their meaning was mistaken ; that their meaning was, and still is, to procure the reforming of things disordered any way, as far as may be ; that the default is in this, that the policie of the Kirk is not yet perfect, nor any sort of conference had amongst godly men, weel minded, and of good judgment, how the matter may be helped. He sent withall ane dis charge of the inhibition lately made. The Superintendent of Angus, at the Eegent's desire, wrot to the superintendents and commissioners for a meeting, to consult what order shall be taken for provision to the King's House out of the Thirds, and upon some matters touching the policie of the Kirk and disposition of benefices. Upon the 12th of January 1572, or, according to the old begin- ing of the year, 1571, the superintendents and commissioners from some towns and kirks conveened in Leith. This meeting is called in the Eegister a Convention, yet, in the second session, they con clude it should have the force and power of a Generall Assembly. They ordain, neverthelesse, that the moderator of the last Assembly continue till the nixt ordinary Assembly, and that all who were present at this convention should repair to it also. They confesse, 22 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION in the third session, they had not tyme to stay, and, therfor, upon the 15th day, gave commission and power to the Superintendents of Fife and Angus, Mr WiUiam Lundie of that ilk, Mr Andrew Hay, Commissioner of CHdsdale, Mr David Lindsay, Commissioner of Kyle, Mr Eobert Pont, Commissioner of Murray, and Mr John Craig, one of the ministers of Edinburgh, or any four of them, to compear befor my Lord Eegent his Grace, and so many of the Secret Counsell as his Grace shall appoint, in Leith, in this instant month of January, to conferr and reason upon such heads and articles as shall be proponed to them by his Grace and the Coun sell to conclude, conforme to the instructions given them by this Assembly, and to report their conclusions to the nixt Assembly, to be insert among the acts of the Generall Assembly. Morton, Chancellor, William Lord Euthven, Treasurer, and Eo bert, Commendator of Dumfermline, Secretarie, Mr James Mack- gill, Clerk of Eegister, Sir John Ballandine, Justice-Clerk, Colline Campbell of Glenurquhie, Adam, Bishop of Orkney, were nominat commissioners by the Counsell upon the 16th day of January, to conveen all or any four of them, with the commissioners nominat by the Kirk, to treat and conclude anent all matters tending to the ordering and estabhshing of the Policie of the Kirk, the sustenta- tion of ministers, support of the King's Majestie's House, and com mon affairs of the realme, to continue in such order as shall be agreed upon until his Hignesse' perfect age, or untill the same be altered or abolished by the Three Estate in Parhament. The same day the commissioners conveen, and conclude that the names and titles of Bishops and Archbishops be not altered, nor the bounds of the old diocies confounded; that ther be an Chapter of ministers annexed to every metropolitan or cathedral! see; that du ring the vacancie, the Dean, or, failing the Dean, the next in digni- tie in the Chapter use jurisdiction in spiritualibus, which the Bishop might have used; that the Archbishops and Bishops exerce no farder jurisdiction by their spiritual! function, then the superintendents had and presently exerce till the same be agreed upon ; that bishops and archbishops be subject to the Kirk and Generall Assemblies OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 23 of the same in spiritualibus, as they are to the King in temporalibus ; that they have the advice of six at the least of the most learned in the Chapter, to the admission of such as shall have function in the Kirk, and that as many others of the Chapter as please may be pre sent, and vote at the said admission; that ministers and readers be planted throughout the reahne ; that ther be readers specially ap pointed at every special! kirk, where it may be done conveniently, who, being found qualified by the Bishop or Superintendent, and entering by the lawfull order of the true Eeformed Kirk, shall minis ter the sacrament of baptisme, and solemnize marriage after law- full and orderly proclamation of bannes, as effeirs ; that all common kirks be disposed as benefices to qualified persons ; that no dispoT sition be made of any deanrie, provostrie, colledge kirk, or other benefice, whereunto diverse kirks are annexed, till it be provided how the ministrie of every one of these several! kirks shall be sus tained of the fruits of the same kirk, if it be possible, by speciall assignation of so much yearly stipend as shall be found reasonable ; that he who shall have the stile, title or place of abbot, prior or commendator, be learned and well qualified, because he must have place in Parhament ; that the King's letters commendatory under the signet being directed to the Archbishop or Bishop of the bounds, where the abbacie or priorie lyeth, he shall try his ability and learning, and upon his testimoniall from his ordinar, the person nominat shall compear before the King or his Eegent, and give his oath in forme as the Bishop giveth; and because the persons of the convents are departed this life, the ministers serving the kirks of the abbacie or priorie shall be the Chapter or assessors to the Com- mendators in giveing of any infeftments, tacks, rights or dispositions of rents concerning the living ; that the person admitted commen dator may be promoved, if he shall be found worthy, to be a sena tor in the Colledge of Justice, or imployed by the King in the necessary affairs of the commonwealth ; that, first of all, it be pro vided how the ministers of the kirks belonging to the abbacie or priorie shall be sustained of the fruits belonging to the same kirks. They do not specifie, notwithstanding of all this tryall and exami- 24 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION nation, whither the person nominat must be a minister or not, but it seemeth he may be. Sundry other articles or conclusions were agreed upon, concern ing the disposition of provostries, prebendaries, colledge kirks, founded upon temporal lands, or annuells ; as also of chaplanries of the like foundation for support of the schoolls ; the chapters of metropolitan and cathedral kirks; the King's recommendation with licence to choose a bishop ; the form of the edict to conveen the Chapter for his election ; the testimoniall of the Dean and Chapter to be returned to the King or his Eegent ; the confirmation, provi sion and royal assent upon the Chapter's certificat; the King's com mand to consecrat him ; his oath to be taken befor the King and his Eegent; the King's restitution of the temporahties; the form of a letter to be directed to the ordinar, or the see vacant, to the Dean of the Chapter, in favours of a person to be promoved to an abbacie or priorie ; the testimonyall of the ordinary returned to the King or his Eegent; the gift and provision upon the ordinar's certificat; the forme of the tryall of bursars, and their gift and provision ; the forme of the oath to be given by the person provided to any bene fice with cure, at his admission, and of bursars of arte, theologie, lawes, medicine, at the tyme of their recept into the Universities. These Articles and formes were considered by the Counsell, and approved by the Eegent, in the King's name, upon the first of Fe-' bruary 1571, or, according to the now beginning of the year, 1572. This gaUimaufrey* made with such haste could not be weeU made. Here was a fair shew of restoring benefices to the Kirk, but in effect it was only to put kirk-men in titles, that noblemen might get the greater security from the titulars of temporal! lands to be feued by them, ease of their tithes, and pensions to their servants and dependers ; and therefor was this goodly Policy forged. It had been good for the spirituall welfare of the Kirk of God, that such titles had never been hatched, or suffered to keep any life in a re formed kirk. These bishops of the new forge were called " Tul- * Galimafre'e, a French word signifying hotch-potch; and, in English, any inconsis tent or ridiculous medley. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 25 chane bishops." Tulchan is a calf-skin stuffed with straw to cause the cow give milk. The bishop served to cause the bishoprick yeeld commoditie to my lord, who procured it to him. Edicts were affixed upon the kirk door and abbey gate of Saint Andrews, upon the Lord's Day, the third of February, by the Earl of Morton's direction. UponFryday the 8th of February, Mr Patrick Adamson, discontented because he was not preferred, in his sermon, made three sorts of bishops, My lord bishop, my lord's bishop, and the Lord's bishop. " My lord bishop," said he, " was the bishop in tyme of Poprie ; my lord's bishop is now when my lord getteth the benefice, and the bishop serveth for a portion, with a title to make my lord's right sure; the Lord's bishop is every true minister of the gospell." Mr John Douglas was chosen, notwithstanding many opposed to the election. George Scott, minister at Kirkaldie, took instruments that he consented not. Mr Knox, being then re sident at St Andrews, by reason of the trouble, preached upon the 10th of February in presence of the Earle of Morton, but refused to inaugurat Mr John ; yea, in open audience of many, he denounced " anathema" to the giver, and " anathema" to the receiver. After sermon, the Superintendent of Fife went up to the pulpit, taught upon the first chapter of the Epistle to Titus, and, after doctrine, followed the same order that was used in the admission of superin tendents ; but when the Superintendent demanded if he would not be obedient to the Kirk, and usurp no power over the same, he an swered, he wold clame no greater power nor the Counsell and Generall Assemblie should prescribe. It is likely these Bishops and the Court aimed at a greater power than was already agreed upon, and that they looked to obtain at the General Assembly what they pleased, having sped so weell at the last Convention at Leith. In that Convention it was aggried, That bishops and archbishops exerce no greater power and jurisdiction in their spiritual function then the superintendents, (but mark what follows,) " while [un til] the same be agreed upon," whereby appeareth farther was in tended. Mr John Douglas read his answer to every demand out of write. The Bishop of Caithness, the Superintendent of Lothian, 26 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION and Mr David Lindsay, sitting on a foorm befor the pulpit beside him, laid their hands on him, and embraced him in signe of admis sion. When Mr John Eutherfoord, provost of the Old Colledge, per- ceaved Mr Knox his repineing to have proceeded from malecon- tentment, the next Sabbath, in sermon, he [Knox] said, " I have refused a greater bishoprick nor ever it was, which I might have had with the favour of greater men then he hath his. I did and do repine for the discharge of my conscience, that the Kirk of Scotland be not subject to that order." It is to be observed, by the way, that Mr Knox was not at the Convention holden at Leith, nor was not able to travell to Assemblies for infirmity of body. The Assembly holden at Saint Andrews in March next follow ing appointed twenty, or any eight of the number, to conveen in Mr Knox his house, to revise and consider the articles and conclusions agreed upon at Leith, and to report to the next Assembly ; but we find no report made nor insert in the Eegister. The Superintend ents of Fife, Angus and Lothian, were desired by this Assembly to continue in their jurisdiction without prejudice of the Archbishop, or, in effect, to assist and help the Archbishop. When Mr Knox had heard that the Assemblie had continued the Bishop Eector of the University, notwithstanding of a bill given in by some of the University, [he] regrated that so many offices were laid upon the back of an old man, which twentie men of the best gifts wold not be able to bear ; for he was now a bishop, rector of the University, provost of the new colledge. This Bishop, indeed, as he was unable of body to travell, he was unable of tongue to preach ; but little respect had the Court to the abilities of the person, so that com- moditie could be reaped by vertue of the title. This Bishop had neither the health, wealth nor honor he had befor. Morton and his friends took up a great part of his rent in feus, tacks and penr sions. Theodoras Beza, being informed of the course which was taken in Scotland for the erection of the estate of bishops, wrote a letter to Mr Knox, dated at Geneva, in April 1572, which I know not if OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 27 it came to Mr Knox befor his death, that is befor November, as it is like it did. La this letter he adviseth him and the rest of the brethren, as followeth : " As bishops bred the Papacie, so bastarde bishops, the relicts of the Papacie, will not faill to bring in epicu- reisme upon the earth. Whosoever, therefor, wish the saftie of the Kirk, let them bewar of this plague ; and seeing ye have timously put it to flight in Scotland, I intreat you never receave it again, howbeit it entice with a pretext of preserving unity, which hath deceaved even many of the best ancients." The Assembly, holden at Perth, in August 1572, appointed some to conferr with those who were at the aggreement in Leith, upon the heads and articles aggreed upon, and to report, which they did, with a protestation, to which the Assembly adhered, alse well that were in commission at Leith, as others. They offend at the names of Archbishop, Dean, Archdean, Chancellor, Chapter, Abbott, Prior, and would have the name of Archbishop not used; the Chapter to be called the Bishops Assemblie ; the Dean, the Mode rator of that Assemblie, and sicklike ; the names of Archdean and Chancellor to be changed. As for the functions of Deans, Arch- deans and Chancellors, Abbots and Priors, they think good some be appointed to try and give their judgment, how farr the same shall be extended ; and upon the changing of the names or titles, they con tinue farder, revising the articles to a farther opportunity, and ad- hereing to their protestation, that the said heads and articles agreed upon be receaved only as an interim, till farther and more perfect order be obtained at the King's Majestie's Eegent and nobilitie, for which they will presse as occasion shall serve. So they say they will not stand to that interim during the King's minority ; and, in effect, they will not stand to any thing aggreed upon ; for they have not condescended upon the description and extent of those functions above mentioned, nor their names, and referr farder consideration of all the heads and conclusions to a fitt opportunity. So, in effect, they aggree to no interim ; for it wer absurd to think that they aggreed for an interim to offices or functions, not yet condescended upon, nor yet their names. In 28 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION the mean tyme way was given to the now admitted bishop to exerce his office according to the aggreement; and others after were inau gurated after the like manner. Upon the 24th of November 1572, the same day that Mr Knox was buried, the Earle of Morton was chosen Eegent. Mr James Paton is inaugurat bishop of Dunkelden, not long after. In August 1573, the Eegent, in his articles to the Assemblie, craveth a day to be appointed for the admission of moe bishops. The Superintendents, notwithstanding, were continued, both where bishops were placed, and where not placed, howbeit they desired to be disburdened : for where they were placed, if the diocie was so large that the Bishop was not able to overtake the charge of visitation, as in Glasgow and St Andrews, superintend ents were continued and commissioners appointed for so much of their bounds as the Assembly limited to them. The Superintend ent of Fife only was called the Superintendent of Stratherne, during Mr John Douglas's lifetime, because bis chief charge of visi tation was in Fife and, after his death again, he was called Super intendent of Fife. Sundry complaints was made upon these new made bishops. Mr John Douglas was delated in March 1573, of old 1572, for admit ting a Popish priest to minister baptisme, to whom the Superintend ent of Lothian befor had given certain injunctions, which he had not obeyed, for not visiting the halfe-year bypast. He answered, he admitted not the priest till he recanted his Poprie openly in the kirk of St Andrews. The Assembly enjoineth the priest to satis- fie the Superintendent's injunctions, and, in the mean tyme, inhi- biteth him to exerce any office in the Kirk. To the second he answered, he preached where he visited be himselfe, but might not visit since the last Assembly, by reason of his sicknesse and infir mity. In August 1573, he was delated for giving collation of a benefice, bestowed befor upon a minister to another suspect of Poprie ; for suffering of the exercise of Saint Andrews to decay ; for admitting some to function in the Kirk that were unable and untryed, specially such as came out of Merce and Lothian ; for OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 29 receaving some ia St Andrews who had committed offence in Lothian; for visiting by others and not by himselfe. He pretended either ignorance or the season of the year, or referred to the books of his visitation. He ended his dayes in the year 1574 ; fell down dead in the pulpit of St Andrews, and never recovered again ; which is to be observed, for he was the first that was inaugurat bishop since the Eeformatione. Mr James Paton, Bishop of Dun- kelden, was delated in sundry Assembhes, for sundry things. In August 1575, he was suspended for not excomunicating the Earl of Atholl, a Papist, according to the ordinance of the Assembly. He confessed he had sett nineteine years tack of thirtie chalder of victuall of teind, for half a mark the boll, to the Earle of Argyle, but was willing to have it reformed, either with his favour, or by processe of law. Further processe against him was continued till the next Assembly, at the Eegent's request. In March proceeding, he was delated for admitting one to be reader, who, within twenty days after, went with a dead corps to the kirk, having his super- cloth upon him, as was reported. He was commanded to try the report. George, Bishop of Murray, was delated in March for for nication alleadged committed with M, and was injoined to purge himselfe ; wherein he was lingering. Commission was given to some of the brethren to summond the Chapter of Murray befor them to try their proceeding, and what grounds they had to give their tes- timoniall without due tryall of his conversation and literature. He was a whole winter mumling upon his papers, and yet was not prompt in the delivery of his sermon. Mr James Boyd was in duced by my Lord Boyd to accept the bishoprick of Glasgow, the gift whereof he, being familiar with the Earle of Morton, pur- chassed for his commoditie. In August 1574, he excused his neg ligence with his imployment in the temporall affairs of his bishop rick : he was not so well qualified as need were. Alexander Gordon, Bishop^of Galloway, was discharged to exerce any func tion in the Kirk till the Assembly were further advised. Sundry things were laid to his charge in the Assembly following, in August 1573, to wit, that in the time of the late troubles, he intruded him- 30 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION s self in the ministery of Edinburgh; refused to pray for the King ; incited them to rebeUion against him, notwithstanding of his oath of obedience ; sat in a pretended Parhament to dispossesse him of his crowne ; gave thanks to God pubhckly for the slaughter of the Earle of Lennox, Eegent ; had committed sundry heinous offences. He claimed to the benefite of pacification, which was made at the ending of the troubles ; but aU which was laid to his charge was not comprehended under that act. In August 1574, John Brand, minister ofHolyroodhous, was enjoined, under the pain of depriva tion, to excommunicat him in case he do not satisfy. La March foUowing, he submitted himself, excused pairt, confessed or denyed other pairts. Upon his submission, and, for the Eegent's request, he was only ordained to confesse his offence pubhckly in the Abbey Kirk. In August 1575, he presenteth the order of his satis faction ; he is restored to the liberty of preaching, but standeth still suspended from the commission of visitation, but is desired to assist Mr John Eow, Commissioner for GaUoway. Now ye have seen what manner of men our first Bishops were, and that the Court Lords aimed at their own commoditie more then any good pohcie in the Kirk. Sundry acts were made in the mean tyme for curbing both Bishops and Superintendents. In March 1573, this article given in by the Superintendent and ministers of Lothian was approved: to wit, that the extract of the head of the superintendent's office, registred in the Book of Disciphne, may be given to the ministers of every province, that the superintendent's office may be tryed there by, that as they are found diligent or negligent, they may be con tinued or changed. In March 1574, it was concluded that the jurisdiction of bishops shaU not exceid the jurisdiction of superin tendents, which befor they had or presently have, and that they shaUbe subject to the discipline of General Assemblies as members thereof, as superintendents have been in aU sorts ; that no superin tendents or commissioners to plant kirks shaU give coUation of benefices or admit ministers, without the assistance of three quali fied persons, ministers of the province, who shaU give their testi- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 31 moniaU to the superintendents or commissioners, subscribed with their hand in signe of their consent ; and, in like manner, that no bishops give coUation of any benefice within the bounds of superin tendents, within his diocie, without their consent and testimoniaU subscribed with their hands, and that bishops within their owne diocie visit by themselves, where there are no superintendents, and give no coUation of benefices, without consent of three weeU qualified ministers, as said is of superintendents and commissioners to plant kirks. La August foUowing, anno 1574, it was ordained that super intendents and commissioners found negligent in their office, or not executing their dutifuU charge, in their visitation and preaching, or culpable in their life, shaU be punished and censured according to the quality of their offence, either by admonition, pubhct repentance, deprivation for a tyme, or deprivation simpliciter, as the Assembly shaU think good. In August 1575, because it appeared to some brethren that the long continuance of commissioners in their office wold breed ambition and other inconveniences, it was thought good, where able men might be had, that a yearly change be made. In the decision of questions, it was answered that bishops might not transport ministers, but with the advice of their Assembly. When the Eegent, in March 1573, craved some learned men in the minis try to be placed Senators of the CoUedge of Justice, the Assembly, after reasoning at length, concluded, That none was able to bear both the charges, and therefor inhibited any minister to take upon him to be a senator in the CoUedge of Justice, Mr Eobert Pont only excepted, who was already placed. He was Ucenced by that Con vention which was holden at Leith in January 1572; and yet in August foUowing, he was delated, that, being a commissioner of Murray, he made no residence in Murray,, visited no kirks these two years bygone, except Elgin, Innernesse and Forresse, &c. He aUedged want of leasur ; the truth is, he was distracted with another charge. At the same Assembly in March preceeding, it was proponed by the Superintendent and ministers of Lothian, Whether it be lawfuU by the word of God that the administration of the word and sacraments, and the ministration of criminaU and 32 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION civU justice be so confounded, that one person might occupy both the charges ? It was answered, It was neither agreeable with the Word of God nor the practice of the primitive Kirk. The GeneraU Assemblies were moderated aU this tyme, not by any bishop, except once, to wit, in March 1575, (of old 1574,) by Mr James Boyd, nor superintendent but once, to wit, the Superin tendent of Angus in March 1572. At other tymes, ministers, Mr Eobert Hamiltoun minister of St Andrews, David Ferguson, Mr Alexander Arbuthnet, Mr Andrew Hay, Mr John Duncanson, Mr Eobert Pont, moderated. The GeneraU Assembly, in their humble supphcation to the Ee gent in March 1574, (alias 1573,) appeaU to his owne knowledge E, since God blessed this country with the light of the Evangell, the Kirk appointed not, and, by Act of Parhament, it was authorised that two GeneraU Assemblies should be holden twice in the year? which they wold not have aUedged so confidently if it had not been true; and yet now we misse such an act, and cannot find it extant amongst the printed Acts of Parhament. Ye see, then, the first sort of bishops, accepted only for an interim, had no greater jurisdiction then the superintendents, differed only in their manner of entry, and that they had vote in Parhament in respect of their barronie and benefice, which superintendents had not : So that second course differeth nothing from the first in effect, but both may be comprehended under the name of " Superintend ents, and their Jurisdiction also from tyme to tyme Eestrained ;" so that we may justly say, the government of superintendents, limit ed and restrained as said is, endured to the end of 1575 years. As befor, commission was given to consult upon the causes be longing to the jurisdiction of the Kirk, so during this course also we find, in August 1573, that some of the CounseU wer to be appointed to confer with commissioners of the Kirk, upon articles concerning the jurisdiction and policy of the Kirk. Mark the words, " jurisdic tion and policie :" so the stable and constant Policie was not yet concluded. In March 1575, the Assembly appointed some to con- ferr with the Eegent's commissioners upon the jurisdiction and OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 33 Policie of the Kirk, and to bring an copie of the conference with them, that aU the provinces may have use of it, to the end they may be the better resolved when the matter shaU come to publict reasoning. This Assembly ordained an article to be given in to them, who reason upon the policie and jurisdiction of the Kirk, That an law may be made that no bishop be elected to a bishoprick by the Chapter, befor he give a prooff of his doctrine befor the GeneraU Assembly, and tryaU be taken by them of his doctrine, life and conversation ; and in the mean tyme discharged and inhi bited aU Chapters to proceed to the election of any bishop without tryaU taken befor of bis doctrine, Ufe and conversation befor them ; and that thereafter he report his testimonial from the Assembly to the Chapter. By this one article, the reader may easihe perceive what is meant by " policy," in the commissions above mentioned, and that Leith's PoUcy was not established, not so much as for an interim. La August 1575, John Durie, one of the ministers of Edinburgh, when bishops were under tryaU, as the superintendents were, accord ing to the Order, protested, that the tryaU of a bishop prejudge not the reasons which he, and other brethren of his mind, had to oppone against the office- No wonder it was that at every Assembly they were vexed with delations against bishops, seeing the office it self was not lawful. Anent the question proponed by certain brethren, Whether, if the bishops as they are now in Scotland, have their functions from the Word of God or not ? or E the Chapters appointed for creating of them ought to be tolerated in this Eeformed Kirk? For the better so lution, this General Assembly in August 1575, appointed Mr John Craig, then minister at Aberdeen, Mr James Lawson, minister in Edinburgh, Mr Andrew MelviU, then Principal of the CoUedge of Glasgow, for the one part, Mr George Hay, Commissioner of Cath- ness, Mr John Eow, minister at Perth, Mr David Lindsay, minister at Leith, on the other part, to reason and conferr upon this question and to report their judgment. In the sixth session they reported their judgment in writ as foUoweth : viz. They think it not expe- c 34 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION dient presently to answer directly to the question; but if any bishop be chosen who hath not such quaUties as the Word of God requireth, let him be tried by the General Assembly de novo, and so deposed. THE POINTS WHEREIN THET AGREE CONCERNING THE OFFICE OF A BISHOP OR SUPERINTENDENT. First, the name of Bishop is common to every one of them that hath a particular flock, over which he hath a peculiar charge, as weU to preach the word as to minister the sacraments and to execute ecclesiasticaU discipline with consent of his elders. And this is his chief function by the Word of God. Morover, out of this number may be chosen some to have power to oversee and visit such reasonable bounds besids his own flock, as the General Assembly shaU appoint, and in these said bounds to appoint ministers with consent of the ministers of that province, and consent of the flock to whom they shaU be appointed; also to appoint elders and deacons in every particular congregation, where none are, with consent of the people; and to suspend ministers for reason able causes with consent of the ministers forsaid. They thought it not expedient to answer directly to the question for the present, because the Court was set for the state of Bishops ; yet in their articles they make a bishop no bishop, because they tye him to a particular flock ; but this office of visitation also was after thought needless, where presbitries wer constitut. Observe, here, also the superintendent is joined with the bishop, and the articles strick at both, and both were removed to the door togither. Mr Andrew MelviU returned to Scotland in July 1574, before which tyme the conclusions at Leith wer caUed in question, and the matter of policie was in hands. Because the former was not condescended upon, what could he do when he came, but by the abilitie of his gifts ? he had no power to command the meanest mi nister, let be to overrule Assemblies. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 35 THE THIRD COURSE : OF VISITOURS. The advice and opinion given in by the brethren concerning this question moved about the office of bishops in the last Assembly, after reasoning at length upon every article, was approved by the Assem bly foUowing in April 1576. And to the end the said articles may be put readUy in execution, bishops who had not received the charge of a particular congregation wer injoined to condescend what par ticular congregation every one wold make choice of; and because the bounds which bishops, superintendents and commissioners of countreyes had befor were too large, wher thorough discipline was not duely exercised through lack of visitation, some were appointed to go apart, and, according to the parts of the countrey designed to them respective, to make a division of the whole realme into such bounds as might be commodiously visited by such Visitors as shaU be appointed by the Assembly. They give in their judgment, and the Assembly nominated one, two, or three ministers for visitation of any of the limited bounds as they thought expedient. The brethren appointed to advise upon their office, power and jurisdiction, gave in the Articles foUowing which were ap proved : — " That he caU the rest of the ministers togither within the bounds of his visitation ; hold SynodaU Assembhes and be moderator ; try ministers ; have the oversight of schools, [and he] be tryed by this Assembly ; propone matters that are to be consulted upon ; gather votes, [and] declare what is found by votes; have the oversight of aU the particular kirks within the bounds of his visi tation and of the ministry thereof; see that every one of the ministers exercise their own vocation diligently in their own con gregations ; in the bounds of his visitation, appoint ministers with advise of the ministry of the province assembled in the Pro- vinciaU Assembly, at the least, six of the best learned within his bounds, or, that faffing, of the next adjacent to be chosen in the SynodaU Assembhes, the cause being there tryed, particular inti mation being made to his particular congregation to be present, c 2 36 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION except some urgent Cause occur that it be necessary to do the same with short advice, as if the minister committ some notorious cryme, whereby he cannot longer be detained in his office, in which case the Visitor may conveen them that are upon the exercise of that province, and they, with him and the session of the particular kirk, proceed to suspension, after lawful tryaU. Upon the presenta tions of patrons to the Visitor, he, with consent of the SynodaU As sembly of his province, shaU give letters testimoniaU to him that is presented, lawful impediments being taken away, at the least with the advice of six ministers within his bounds, or, that faffing, of the next adjacent, to be chosen in the SynodaU Assembly, provyding alwayes, that the consent of the flock where he should be appointed be had, or else a reasonable cause be shewed by them, wherefor not ; and in caise he hath been a minister befor, that he receive his letters testi- moniaUs upon the presentation, with the consent or advice of the mi nisters of the exercise within that province ; and that none give col lation of any benefice without the bounds committed to hfm by com missioners from the Kirk. That aU ministers be admonished not to proceed unadvisedly to excommunicate ; and if difficulty arise there- anent, that the Visitor and the rest of the country be advised with ; and sicklike, anent absolution. Where there is not ecclesia bene constituta, that he traveU to constitut it. That he take heed to the keeping of the exercise, repairing of kirks and kirk-yards, desig nation of manses and gleibs, and aU other charges pertaining ad decorem ecclesice, and granted to the Kirk be the lawes of the countrey." So ye see neither bishops nor superintendents is acknowledged any longer ; every minister is a bishop according to Scripture lan guage ; that the office of a visitor is accessory to the office of the ministrie only at, and during the pleasure of the Assembly. Bi shops or superintendents may not visit henceforth so much as a portion of their former diocie, unlesse it be designed to any of them as to other ministers by the Assembly. Ye see these visitors were in effect but constant moderators tyed to Synods or some se lected associats. In July 1580, it was ordained that in every Pro- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 37 vinciaU Assembly certain assessors shaU be nominat by theni to con- curr with the commissioners of the countrey who shaU subscribe with him in aU weighty and great matters ; and, in October 1576, that the books of these commissioners and visitors be sighted at the Ge neraU Assembly. Notwithstanding of aU these cautions and limita tions, it was declared by the Assembly holden in October 1580 to be a corruption, and to tend to tyrrany, that such a kind of office as the office of visitors should stand in the person of one man, which should flow from the presbitries ; yet because of the state of the tyme and lack of present order for estabhshing and constituting presbitries, they suffered that office of visitors yet to stand. It was thought meet that the Clerk Eegister should be requested to con- curr with some ministers deput by them to devise a plott for the constitution of presbytries, and to report their judgment to the next Assembly; yet in July preceeding, anno 1579, when it was men tioned by the Synod of Lothian that a generaU order be taken for erecting of presbytries, where pubhct exercise was used, tiU the policie of the Kirk be established by law, it was answered, The exercise may be judged a presbytrie. This third interim or course of Visitors indured from the begining of the year 1576 tffl the begining of 1581. During this course, bishops were urged with two things. One was to take them to a particular flock, and to quyte other corruptions of that estate, as they were already found out or to be found. In Aprile 1578, it was ordained that aU bishops and others bearing ecclesias- ticaU function be caUed by their own names, or " brethren " in tyme comming. Again, forasmuch as ther is great corruption in the estate of bishops as they are presently made within this realme, whereunto the Assembly wold provide some stay in tyme comming so farr as lyeth in them, to the effect that farther corruption may be brydled, the Assembly hath concluded, that no bishop shaU be elected or admitted hereafter, befor the next GeneraU Assembly, discharging aU ministers and Chapters to proceed to the election of the said bi shops, in the mean tyme, under the pain of perpetual deprivation. In July foUowing, this Assembly, aU in one voice, concluded and 38 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION provided, that the said act shaU be extended to aU tymes to come, ay and tUl the corruption of the estate of bishops be utterly abolished, and that aU bishops already elected be requyred particularly to submit themselves to the GeneraU Assembly concerning the refor mation of the corruptions of that estate of bishops in their persons, which, if they refuse after admonition, to proceed against them to excommunication. In October 1578, the Assembly sett downe the speciaU corruptions which they craved them to reforme, with promise that if the GeneraU Assembly shaU afterward find farther corrup tion, to be content to be reformed by the Assembly, when they shall be required. The corruptions expressed for the present were, that they be pastors and ministers of one flock; that they usurp no cri- minaU jurisdiction; that they vote not in Parhament in name of the Kirk without advice from the Assembly; that they take not up, for the maintainance of their ambition and ryotousnesse, of the emolu ments of the Kirk, which may sustain many pastors, the schools and the poor, but be content with reasonable livings according to their office; that they claime not to themselves the titles of temporaU lords, neither usurp temporaU jurisdiction, whereby they may be abstracted from the discharge of their office; that they impyr not above parti cular Elderships, but be subject to the same ; that they usurp not the power of presbytries; that they take not further bounds of visitation then the Kirk committeth unto them. La July 1580, the office of a bishop was damned by a speciaU act, as foUoweth : " Forasmuch as the office of a bishop as it is now used and commonly taken within this realme, hath no sure warrand, authority, nor ground out of the Scriptures, but was brought in by the foUy and corruption of men's invention to the great overthrow of the true Kirk of God, the whole Assembly in one voice, after liberty granted to aU men to reason in the matter, none opponing themselves in defence of the said pre tended office, findeth and declareth the said pretended office, used and termed as is above said, unlawfuU in the selfe, as having neither fundament, ground, nor warrant in the Word of God ; and ordain- eth, that aU such persons as bruik, or hereafter shall bruik, the said office, to be charged simpliciter to dimitt, quyte, and leave off the OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 39 samen, as an office whereunto they are not caUed by God : And sick- like, to desist and cease from preaching, ministration of the sacra ments, or using any way the office of pastors, whUe they receave de novo admission from the GeneraU Assembly, under the pain of ex communication, to be used against them: wherein if they be found disobedient or contraveen this act in any point, the sentence of ex communication to be executed against them." Least any man should think that they damned not the office sim- pliciter, but the corruptions, he must know that these corruptions are the very essence of the office; so that to abolish the corruption of the estate of bishops, is to be abolish the corrupt state of bishops. For if the name be common to aU pastors, and every one must be bound to a particular flock, and can claim no superiority over bis brethren, by virtue of such an office, the bishop is no more a bishop, as a diocesian bishop is now defined, but every minister is a bishop, and the Scripture acknowledgeth no other. In this Assembly it was also declared, that aU coUations or admis sions that shaU be given by any pretending the style of Bishop shaU be void in the self, null, and of no effect in tyme coining. It was declared likewise, that the offices of readers and exhorters are no ordinary offices in the Kirk of God, and so both bishops and readers were thrust out. In Aprile 1576, Mr James Boyd, Bishop of Glasgow, was de lated for preaching seldome. He confessed he was not so UberaUy doted * with understanding as others ; that preaching is a gift not equaUy bestowed on aU ; yet he had preached at Govane and other kirks, and was wffhng to do his dutie. He was urged to take him to a particular flock: loath was he to be restricted; at length he made choise of the kirk of Oswald, and yet attended not. In October 1578, he was urged to submitt himself to reformation of the corrup tions of his estate, which he was as loath also to do; yet, at last, he was forced to yeeld. His submission was exhibit in write, in July 1579. Mr Patrik Adamsone, soon after the Eeformation, left his * i. t>. gifted. 40 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION flock, and went to other countreyes. After his return, he re-entered to the ministery. Now when he findeth the bishoprick of Saint Andrews vacant, he leaveth Pasley, and becometh the Eegent's minister. He was soon after presented to the bishoprick. Ei April 1577, he was delated, that he had entered in the bishoprick con trary to the acts of the Assembly ; had usurped the office of visita tion in Fife, not being authorized by commission, or with power from the Assembly; and had left his ordinary office of the ministry. Commission was given, because he was absent, to some brethren to try him upon these points, to try the Chapter and the Laaugurers, and to discharge him of farther visitation tiff he be authorised by the Assembly. He at length submitted himselfe; but in October 1578, commission was given to some brethren to charge him with the transgressions committed by him against the tenor of his submis sion, and to charge him to quyte the corruptions of the state of a bishop in his person, as they shaU be particularly specified to him ; and, if he refuse, after due admonition, to excommunicate him. Their commission was renewed in July 1579, to charge him, de novo, to quyt the particular corruptions, whereunto he had not yet agreed in his answer ; likewise to charge him with these offences : First, That having submitted himselfe to the Assembly, he went imme diately after and voted in Parhament. Second, That he gave col lation of a viccarage haveing no power of visitation where the vic- carage lyeth. Third, That he had agreed to aU the heads of poli cie except four, and yet opponed to the same in the Parhament. What were his answers I find not; but I find he submitted. La a word, aU the bishops were brought under subjection, forced to sub- mitt, to quyt the corruptions of their estate, and to obey that act made against bishops in July 1580. In that Assembly, the Bishop of Dunkelden, who had been deposed befor, for not repairing a tack made to the Earle of Argyle, was charged to dimit his bishoprick, and repair the losse of dilapidation of the rents under the pain of excommunication. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 41 OF THE SECOND BOOK OF POLICIE. La the mean tyme, the Assembhes were diligent setting down the constant poUcie which they desired to be estabUshed. In AprUe 1576, commission was given to some brethren of the ministry to conveen, conferr and dehberat upon the poUcie; some from the West to meet in Glasgow ; some for Lothian to meet in Edinburgh ; some for Fife to meet in Saint Andrews ; some for Angus and Mearns in Montrosse ; and some for Aberdeen ; and to meet in severaU companies in the month of June; and to meet, two or one at the least of each company, in a common meeting at Stirling, to conferr their whole traveUs, and to report to the nixt Assembly. La October foUowing, some brethren were appointed to revise their traveUs, conferr upon things already penned, and other things which were presently to be given in, and put them in some good forme. In Aprile 1577, the heads were read pubhctly, and agitat. All had Uberty to oppone with reason. Such as wold not reason in publict were directed to resort to the brethren, who had these heads recommended to their study and search. After reasoning, some heads were referred to further reasoning ; some, because obscure, had need of explanation ; some, because prolix, had need to be contracted, that they might be presented again to pubhct read ing. Some wer appointed to revise the whoU traveUs taken in that matter, digest and dispose them in good order ; and, in the mean time, it was permitted, that if any pleased to reason, that they have accesse to these brethren. In the tenth session, they returned to the Assembhe with the heads digested in order, and in one body. AU that had any argument to the contrary were requyred to propone the same. Three heads wer only caUed in question, De Didconatu, De Jure Patronatus, De Divortiis. These three heads were reasoned upon in utramque partem, — further disputation referred to the day foUowing. Some brethren were appointed to contract or enlarge the heads, where it was requisit, yet more accuratly, and digest them yet in better order. Such as pleased to reason farther were 42 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION directed to resort to them. The visitors were ordained to intimate to the barons within their bounds, that such a work was in hand, and to desire their presence and concurrence at the nixt Assem bly. They send some to the Eegent, from tyme to tyme, to in- forme him of their proceedings and diUgence; but he was not weeU pleased with their platforme. A fast was appointed to be keept through the whole countrey, and to begin upon the Lord's Day, the 9th of June, to continue and end the nixt Lord's Day. One of the chief causes [was], that the work of estabhshing a perfect order and policie in the Kirk, which was presently in hands, might have good successe. La October foUowing, it was thought good that the heads of the policie and jurisdiction, which were read in the audience of the Assembly, should be presented to the Eegent as agreed upon, after reasoning among the brethren, except the head De Diaconatu, with a note that the same is aggreed upon by the most part of the Assembly without prejudice of further reasoning. Some bre thren were appointed to present a coppie; and, in case the Eegent required conference and reasoning, a number were appointed to con- curr and attend upon advertisment given by the Eegent. Beza's Treatise of Divine, Humane, SatanicaU Episcopacie, dedicated to my Lord Glames, ChanceUor, was sett forth in the mean tyme. The Eegent had no doubt stayed the work, he was so sett for bi shops and conformitie with Ingland, unlesse the Lord had stirred up a faction against him. The King is perswaded to take the govern ment in his owne hand, howbeit, the year sett downe in the act of the Queen's dimission was not yet come. Morton resigned the Eegiment upon the 12th of March 1577, or, as we now reakon, 1578. The brethren reported to the Assembly foUowing in Aprile, that they presented the Book of PoUcie to the Eegent, togither with the supphcation of the Assembly, and that a day was appoint ed for conference; but the alteration of authority interveening, they presented some articles to the King, one of which was for the Policie. Because some brethren found some difficulty in the head OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 43 De Diaconatu, further reasoning was referred to this Assembly. AU that had any argument to propone were warned in the fourth ses sion to be prepared the day foUowing; but then none offered to op- pone against or propone any argument. It was thought good that a coppie, after reviewing yet again of the heads, be presented to the King, togither with a supplication, and another coppie to the CounseU. In case conference and reason be craved, some are no minat to conveen with such as shaU be nominat for that effect be the King and CounseU. Another fast is appointed to be keept in June. One of the causes was, that God wold put it in the hearts of the King and Estate, not only to make good lawes for the govern ment of the reahne, but also to establish such a poUcie and disci pline in the Kirk, as is craved in the Word of God, and is conceaved and penned already, to be presented to his Highnesse and CounseU. Whatsoever should be the approbation of the King and CounseU, we see the Assembly hath aggreed and approved the Book. The brethren reported to the Assembly in June 1578, that the King gave a very comfortable and good answer, that not only wold he concurre with the Kirk in aU things that might advance the true religion presently professed, but also wold be a procurator for the Kirk ; that thereafter he presented their supplication to the Coun seU; that some wer appointed by the CounseU to confer with some ministers. That conference was read: little disagreement. By Mor ton's procurement, the Parhament was translated from Edinburgh to Stirling, where Morton stayed with the King, with his favourers and dependers. AthoU and the rest of that faction stayed in Edin burgh discontented. AU that could be obtained at this Parhament was a commission to conferr upon the heads of the Book. The com missioners of the Kirk, who had sought a ratification of the Book, took this for a shift, because the Book was aUowed befor by those who were appointed to conferr upon the matter, except in four heads, wherein was no great difficulty, and which were explained in the last Assembly. They desired so many, at least, to be ratified as were agried upon, and a commission to be given to some to reason upon the rest ; but that was not granted, for Mor- 44 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION ton was the chief guider of this Parhament. Some noblemen of the other faction being present at the Assembly, in October 1578, the Moderator of the Assembly, in name of the Assembly, intreated them for procureing the like, and that none vote in Parhament, in name of the Kirk, but such as have commission from the Kirk. A conference was holden in December, in the Castle of Stirling, by such as the King caUed for ; but, the death of Atholl intervening betwixt and the nixt Assembly, Morton beareth the greatest sway^ The King writeth to the Assembly, which was holden in July 1579, upon occasion of some rumours, that they were to treat of some things which might seeme somewhat prejudiciaU to the eccle- siasticaU poUcie, long traveUed in and hoped for, willing them to for bear any proceeding at that tyme, which may touch matters here- tofor not concluded upon by his laws or receaved in practise ; but whatsoever in the former conferences, touching the policie of the Kirk, was remitted to be reasoned and decided by the Estates in Parliament, so rest without prejudgeing the same by any of their conclusions, at that tyme ; that he is content, that befor the ap proaching Parhament, such matters as are not fully reasoned may be consulted upon, that they may be prepared to passe, in forme of lawes, at the approaching Parhament. The Assembly understand ing how that letter was procured, giveth commission to some brethren to passe to Stirling and present some articles to the King ; this amongst the rest: That, because, in the late conference holden at Stirling, at his Highnesse command, concerning the pohcie of the Kirk, certaine articles thereanent remained yet unresolved, and referred to further conference, that persons unspotted with such corruptions, as are craved to be reformed, may be named by his Majesty, to proceed to a further conference upon the said pohcie, and tyme and place be appointed to that effect. Here ye may see what hath hindered fuU agriement hithertiU. A pithie, eloquent, and prolix letter was penned, to be presented by their commis sioners to the King, to perswade him to establish by law that PoUcie which they had drawn, not out of the cisterns of men's OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 45 traditions, but out of the pure fountain of God's Word; which thing wisely begun in his Highesse name, be his first Eegent of godly memory, and ordained by the Act of Parhament to be fol lowed furth, hath been diligently pressed for from time to time, but especiaU since the acceptation of the government in his own person ; as yet no furtherance. La July 1580, they direct their commissioners to the King with some articles, and this in speciaU, that the Book of PoUcie may be estabUshed by the act of Privy CounseU tUl a Parhament be holden, that the same might be ratified. In October, and the months foUowing, the King caused some of the CounseU conferr with them at sundry dyets, by their direc tion and advise, how Presbytries or Elderships may be constitut of a certain number of paroches lying together, smaU paroches united, and great divided, for the better sustentation of the ministrie, and more commodious resort of people to their kirks. There was also drawne up the forme of a letter, to be written to some of the prin- cipaU noblemen and gentlemen, and some of the ministers within the bounds of every eldership, to conveen, advise, and report to the King their advice in things requyred for this, betwixt and the 24th of June nixt. But, it is to be observed, that the Earle of Morton's death was plotted in the mean tyme. He was accused upon the last of December 1580, and committed to prison upon the 2d of Ja nuary foUowing. Howsoever, he was either through ignorance, as himselfe confessed afterward, or induced by the Inglish, to oppose to the Pohcie which was in hand, yet he was stout and wise, one of the chief mantainers of rehgion, and a chief instru ment to set the crowne upon the King's head. The tyme of his government was esteemed the best that Scotland ever saw. Lest it should be thought alteration of rehgion was intended in cutting off such instruments, it was expedient to hearken to the articles of the Kirk, and please ministers and professors with somthing in the meantyme. The heads of the Policie are extant in print under the title of 46 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION the Second Book of Discipline, whereunto I referr the reader, de siring him to observe, that any bearing office in the Kirk may not usurp dominion or be CaUed lords ; that the titles invented in the kingdome of Antichrist, and his usurped hierarchie, ought not to be suffered in the Kirk of God. They condemne admission of any to papisticaU titles of benefices, such as have no function in a re formed kirk, as Abbotts, Priors, Commendators ; as, also, the old Chapters, Convents of Abbeyes, CathedraU Kirks, and the like ; Deans, Archdeans, Chanters, Subchanters, Treasurers, Chancellours, and others having the like titles flowing from the Pope, or Canon Law ; Diocesian Bishops, their election by Chapters ; that any per son under whatsoever title, attempt any act in the Kirks name, either in CounseU or ParUament, or out of CounseU. To be short, almost every line of the Book condemneth the present course. Ye may see what pains were taken to search out the true and durable pohcie which ought to be estabhshed in the Kirk ; that it was not brought in rashly, without deliberation, but after many conferences and reasoning in pubhct Assemblyes, and other ap pointed meetings, (more grave and learned men was there never in our Kirk then at that tyme) ; that it was not brought in by falshood or force, but hberty was granted to every man to reason and oppone. How this course of Episcopacie hath entered, ye shaU see, in the owne place. We are now to see how this Pohcie was put in practice. THE FOURTH COURSE : OF PRESBYTRIES ENDURING TILL THE TEAR 1610. The Second Confession of Faith, which is commonly called the King's Confession, was subscribed by the King and his household upon the 28th of January 1580, or, according to our new accompt, 1581. The first clause of this Confession comprehendeth the first Confession already ratified in Parhament : so it is not merely ne gative, but partly affirmative, partly negative ; and the negative was added for the better tryaU of Papists, and the sincerity of con verts and professors, in abrenounceing errors. A charge was sub- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 47 scribed by the King at Halyrudhouse, the 2d of March, and pro claimed, commanding commissioners and ministers to urge their pa- rochiners to subscribe this Confession ; to proceed against such as refused, according to the laws and Order of the Kirk, and to delate them to the King and CounseU. This Confession was approved by the GeneraU Assembly, holden in AprUe after, and in other As- semblyes foUowing ; and by their direction, subscription was to be required of ministers and professors of aU ranks. La this Con fession, we professe we detest not only the Pope's owne worldly monarchic, but also the wicked Hierarchie which is maintained and defended by him : the CounseU of Trent declared this hierarchie to consist of bishops, presbyters and deacons. We then professe we detest the degree and superiority of bishops. Again we pro fesse we abhorre and detest aU particular heads, as they were then damned, and confuted by the Word of God, and Kirk of Scotland. But, so it is, that not only the doctrine sounded from pulpits against EpiscopaU government, but, also, it was damned in the Book of Pohcie, agreed upon in the General Assembly, and, by a parti cular act of the Assembly, holden in July 1580, and in Aprile 1581. They declare, that by that act, they meant to condemne whoUy the estate of Bishops, both their spirituaU and temporaU jurisdic tion. When we promise then solemnly, and swear by the great name of the Lord our God, to defend the doctrine and the discipline then approved and embraced by the Kirk of Scotland, according to our vocation and power, under the pains contained in the law, and danger both of soul and body in the day of God's fearftdl judg ment, we promise to maintain the constant disciphne already agreed upon, and not a temporary or interim of superintendents, bishops, visitours, which were aU acknowledged to be brought in for an interim. The PresbyteriaU government was that which they rested upon, already concluded, and plotts were drawne for the constituting of them*; sundry of which were erected befor pro fessors were urged by acts of the Assembly to subscribe this Confes sion. See Aprile and October 1581. * i. e. presbyteries. 48 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION The Laird of Caprintoun presented to the Assembly, holden in AprUe 1581, the King's letter, containing a commission to concurr with the Assembly, together with certain roUs concerning the planting of kirks, and a plott drawn for erecting of Presbytries ; and the letter which was to be sent to the noblemen and gentlemen within the bounds of every Presbytrie, to consider what the As sembly wold have added or diminished in the forme of the letter. In the instructions given be the King, with advise of the CounseU, he is directed to signifie to the Assembly that he hath caused, and yet wiU cause, the conference be keept for furth getting of all things which may set forward the PoUcie, whUe the same may he established by law. In the letter which was to be directed to the noblemen and gentlemen, we have a clear acknowledgment of the necessity of Presbytries in these words : " It is thought impossible to attain to any formaU order likely to have continuance to the posteritie over our whole realme, whffe the ancient bounds of the diocies be dissolved, where the paroches are thick togither and small to be united, and wher they are over great and larger bounds, -to be divided ; and, thereafter, Presbytries or Elderships constitut for a dusson of parishes, or thereabouts, some more, some fewer, as the commodity of the country lyeth, when the ministerie and elders in these bounds conveening may commodiously excercise discipline, and take order in the affairs of the Kirk, so farr as shaU be ap pointed, befor the cognition be brought to the SynodaU Assembly." Some brethrene were appointed to consider the roUs, and plott given in by Caprintain. After they had reported their judgment, the Assembly thought good that, without delay, some Presbyteries be constitut for paterns to such as wer to be erected afterward, viz. at Edinburgh, Saint Andrews, Dundee, Perth, Stirling, Glasgow, Air, Eving, Haddingtoun, Dumbar, Chirnside, Linlithgow, Dum- fermling, and appointed some brethren in severah parts to put that in execution. It was ordained also, that the Book of Pohcie, howbeit it had not so good successe as good men wished, that it might be insert in the Eegister of their Acts for a testimony to the posterity of their pains and travel. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 49 Morton suffered upon the 2d of June. After he was out of the way, the Duke of Lennox began to be troublesome to the Kirk. He provided Mr Eobert Montgomery, minister at StirUng, a stohd asse and arrogant, to the title of the bishoprick of Glasgow, vacant by the death of Mr James Boyd. The brethren of the Presbyterie of Glasgow were sore vexed for refusing to admitt him. Sundry offences and erroneous points of doctrine were laid to his charge in the Assembly holden in October 1581. He was inhibited, under the pain of excommunication, to medle any farther with that matter. The Presbyterie of Stirling is ordained to try him in these articles, which were given in against him, &c. ; yet he persisted and caused the Presbyteries of Glasgow and StirUng, and the Synod of Lothian, to be troubled for opposing him or proceeding against him. He was therefor deprived in Aprile 1582, during the wUl of the As sembly, and had been excommunicated, if he had not stayed the sentence by his submission ; yet they gave power to the Presby terie of Edinburgh to excommunicat him in case he medled any farther. But notwithstanding of his promises and submission, he transgressed the injunctions given him, and therefor was excommu nicated, upon the 10th of June, at the direction of the Presbytery of Edinburgh. Commission was given in June to proceed against the Duke in case he intertained him. The King and CounseU de clared and caused proclaime that the excommunication was nuU ; but the people abhorred him as an excommunicant. When the Duke was preparing for a chamberlaine air,* Marr, Gowrie and others their adherents went to Perth in August, where, meeting with the King returning from hunting in AthoU, they in vited him to Euthven Castle, removed such as favoured Lennox, and the new Earle of Arran, James Stewart, a brother of the house of Ochiltree, another misguider of the Court. Arran was appre hended as he was coming to the King. The Duke is forced to depart out of the country. Some of the Lords, reformers, stay by course about with the King. Mr Eobert Montgomery seeketh to be re conciled to the Kirk again. * Air, an itinerant court of justice. D 50 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION The King, much grieved at the death of the Duke of Lennox, withdrew himselfe from the Lords, and went secretly, upon 28th Ja nuary 1583, out of Falkland to Saint Andrews, accompany ed with CoUoneU Stewart ; where he remained tUl such noblemen repaired to him as he wrote for, and the new Earle of Arran was recaUed. Mr Patrick Adamson had lurked a long tyme in the castle of St Andrews, hke a tod in a hoU diseased of a fearful feditie, as he himself caUed his disease, whereunto he feU through gluttony and drunkennesse which kythed diverse tymes, and once by filthy vomiting, beside the Moderator in the Assembly. For the curing of his disease, he sought help of witches ; but now he becometh whole, went to the pulpit incontinent, declaimed before the King against the ministerie, and the Lords that guarded the King lately. He was warned by the Synod of Fife, apud acta, to compear befor the GeneraU Assembly holden in October 1583 ; where the processe of the Presbytry of St Andrews against him and the witch with whom he consulted, and the processe of the Synod of Fife, were produced. The process being found orderly deduced, and for con- tumacie in not compearing, he was suspended from the office of the ministerie, and farther tryaU was to be taken of his hfe and cor rupt doctrine. Pretending he was to go to the weU of Spa for the recovery of his health, he purchased from the King security that, during his absence, the Kirk should not proceed against him. But it was his purpose to stay in England under the colour of ambas- sage, and there to seek the advice of the most corrupt sort he could find, for the overthrow of the discipline of the Kirk of Scot land ; for he thought the surest course to keep his benefice was to use some wicked and indirect deaUing against the Kirk. The Lords who had possessed themselves about the King at Euth- ven, and their adherents, wer either induced to take a remission, or forced to depart out of the countrey. Such as had licence granted to depart had a time prescribed to them. Gowrie fingered, wait ing upon the opportunity of taking the Castle of Stirling, which was intended by Angus, Marr and the Master of Glames. Gowrie was apprehended and beheaded in Stirling, the 2d of May 1584. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 51 Some ministers, howbeit no way privie to the enterprize of tak ing the Castle of Stirling, were certainly informed that they were to be apprehended without any citation ; because Mr Andrew Mel vill, compearing in February 1584 befor the Lords of Secret Coun seU, declined them as judges of his doctrine, and, therefor, was commanded to enter into Blacknesse ; but he being informed that his life was sought, conveyed himself into England. Now others, to eschew violence, foUow after : Mr John Davidson, Mr James Carmichael, Mr Patrik GaUoway and some others. In the meantyme our famous ambassadour, Mr Patrick Adamson, is not idle in England. His carriage there is painted out in the " Legend of the Limmer's Life." After he had ended his negotia tion in England, he returned soon after the execution of the Earle of Gowrie. It was concluded in CounseU, that a Parhament should be holden, and begun the 19th of May. No intimation was made befor by proclamation. Such as were privie to it were of Arran's faction, or such as durst not oppose themselves. The Lords of the Articles were sworn to be secret. They had but five sessions in three dayes. The dooers were kept so closse, that none of the ministrie could find accesse. Dangerous acts were concluded, which the reader may see extant among the Acts. Mr Patrick Adamson and Mr Eobert Montgomery satt in this Parhament, as representing the Third Estate, and gave their voices, forsooth ! to make themselves Bishops. The King and CounseU, suspecting that the ministers of Edinburgh wold declaime against the proceedings of that Parhament, sent a charge to the provest and baiUies, to pull them by violence out of the pulpit, and to committ them to prison, in case they did so. The provest and baiUies dryve tyme tiU the acts wer proclamed. The acts were proclaimed upon the 25th of May. Mr Eobert Pont, and Mr Walter Balcanquell, took pubhct documents in the name of the Kirk of Scotland, in the hands of George Mackeson, that they protested against the said acts. Mr James Lawson, and Mr Walter BalcanqueU, ministers of Edinburgh, understanding what charge was given to the provest and the baiUies, what Arran had threatned, what was intended d2 52 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION against them, after consultation with the Presbytrie, with the chief of their flock, and some barrons and gentlemen dwelling near by, withdrew themselves and went to England. What letters past be twixt them and their flock, of which some proved very undutiful, and no better then enemies, I passe by as too prolix to be insert in so short an abridgement. Some others fled soon after ; others were troubled and committed to prison here at home. The Acts were so agitat among the subjects, and misliked by good men, that the Court was forced to sett Mr Patrick Adamson, the chief deviser, on work, to make a Declaration of their meaning and the King's intentions, and that as in the King's name. This Declaration came to Ught in January nixt foUowing ; was so greedily embraced by the Enghsh bishops, reprinted with an odious pre face ; * and to preserve the memory of it, was inserted in the Conti nuation of Holinshed, where that being lybeU lyeth as a blurr to blot their Chronicle. Sundry confutations went current in writ among men's hands, speciaUy in a dialogue entituled Zelator and Temporizer, where Palemon decerneth for Zelator. f Ministers were urged to subscribe obedience to the Parliamen- tarie bishops, and approbation of the late acts, under pain of the losse of their benefice or stipend. Many yeelded ; a good number refused. Sundry reasons were writen by Mr James MelviU, then remaining after his flight in Berwick, and by sundry others, where by the brethren were strengthened. The shortnesse of this abridge ment wiU not suffer me to descend into a particular deduction. These troubles endured tul the pest began to rage in Edinburgh, and other chief towns. The people cryed out, that the Lord's hand wold not be stayed tiU the banished Lords and ministers returned ; whereupon their friends advertised them to draw near to the Bor ders ; but there was difficulty in obtaining Ucence from the Queen; yet, when the Lord EusseU, eldest son to the Earle of Bedfoord, was slain at a meeting in the borders, between the Wardens, upon the 26th July 1585, and no redresse could be had, the Queen suf- * See the Wodrow Miscellany, vol. i. p. 473, &c. t This dialogue is inserted in Calderwood's History, vol. iv. pp. 295-339. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 53 fered the banished to return without asking the King's consent. The banished Lords, Angus, Marr, and the Master of Glames, and the Commendator of Arbroth, banished long before for other causes, re- turne to the borders, gather their forces. Maxwell, lately persued by the Court, joineth with them. They came forward to Stirling. Arran seeing the Castle wold be rendered, escaped upon the 2d of November be the bridge. The Lords were receaved into favor, and a Parhament was appointed to be holden in December for their restoration. Ministers repair from aU parts to Lirdithgow a Uttle befor the begining of the Parhament. The sincerer sort sought an abroga tion of the late acts. The King was so headstrong, that the banished Lords, notwithstanding of their fair promises in time of their exffe, pretended it was not expedient to medle in that matter at that tyme ; they must be first settled in their own Estats, and then they would work wonders ; the King might be wrought upon afterward and won, &c. The good Earle of Angus was willing indeed for his part, but could not find any concurrence ; yet the ministers insisted with the King. He desired them to sett downe in write what ex ceptions they had against the late acts. They sett down their ani madversions as pithy as shortnesse of time wold suffer, which they presented with a supplication, wherin they craved the ministery to be restored to their former possessions, as weU of discipUne as of their places, from which they were displaced by occasion of the said acts. The King took pains to pen a declaration of the acts with his own hand, which, when he had dehvered to them, he said should be as good and sufficient as an Act of Parhament ; yet was it not sufficient, but rather needed a reply. But the cold winter and uneasie lodging caused the Parliament hasten to an end. A conference was holden in February foUowing betwixt some of the Secret CounseU and some of the Ministery, not of the soundest sort apparently, such as yeelded subscription; wherein it was aggreed that Presbytries should be re-estabhshed, but yet that those that bruiked the title of Bishops should have power to give collation of benifices, moderate in Synods, visit diocies, with advise of such 54 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION as should be chosen by the nixt GeneraU Assembly, and after by the SynodaU, and wher ther are no bishops that ther be commis sioners appointed having the like power. But in Aprile the Synod of Fife, which had been intermitted two years by occasion of the troubled estate of the Kirk, conveened in Saint Andrews, cutt off Mr Patrick Adamson as a rotten member, by excommunication, for teaching, notwithstanding that he was suspended by the Gene raU Assembly, for the notorietie of the offences for which he was suspended; for impugning the settled order of GeneraU Assembhes and Presbytries ; for contempt of the Synod ; and for other noto rious slanders whereof he was to be accused, but refused to un- derly the tryaU. The Bishop directed a messenger with a com plaint to the King, and ane appeUation to the King, Estate and CounseU ; which was learnedly and at length confuted by Mr James MelviU. The GeneraU Assembly foUowing soon after, which was holden in May 1586, without examination of their processe or his appeUation, but for the good hope they had of the King's favour able concurrence to bind up the House of God, and the promises made by Mr Patrick in his submission, held the said processe and sentence as unled, undeduced, and pronounced. Against this forme of proceeding protestation was made by some of the brethren of that Synod. In this Assembly was first seen what fear and flattery of Court might work among weak and inconsiderat ministers. Much travel, indeed, was taken by the Court to obtain this, and the subscriving ministers had not as yet throughly repented. The Bishop, notwith standing, was odious to the godly, remained suspended, and felt the weight of the sentence more heavy afterward, not resting upon this absolvitor. The same Assembly assented to the conditions sett downe in the late conference, for the most part, but [except] that in receiving of presentations and giving conations, the Bishop or Commissioner shaU proceed with advise of the Presbytery, and other assessors to be joined to him, or, of the most part of them, till the Generall Assembly take farther order, that their visitation of Presbytries or OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 55 particular kirks be not prejudiciaU to the Presbytries owne visi tation ; that they neither admitt nor deprive without consent given of the most part of the Presbytrie and other assessors to be joined by the Synod ; that as a pastor of a particular flock, he shaU be subject as other pastors to the tryaU and censur of Presbytries and Synods, but in respect of their commission, to the GeneraU As sembly. But the King could not be satisfied unlesse they were subject only to the censure of the GeneraU Assemblies, and, there for, it was yeelded to, untiU farther order were taken by the Gene rall Assembly ; yet Presbytries were re-estabUshed, time and place appointed for holding of SynodaU AssembUes. Commission was given to some brethren to lead processe against a number of these bishops and commissioners, reserving the sentence till the nixt GeneraU Assembly ; and it was declared, in the sixth session, that ther are four ordinary office-bearers in the Kirk set down to us by the Scriptures — Pastors, Doctors, Elders, Deacons, and that the name of Bishop must not be taken as it hath been in tyme of Papistrie, but it is common to aU pastors and ministers. The mixed government of bishops, or commissioners, and Pres bytries could not endure long ; howbeit those who had befor been possessed in the benefice were tolerated stiU to enjoy the same. But, in the Assembly foUowing, in June 1587, they ordained the Presbytrie of Glasgow to annuU their admission of one to the temporahtie of the bishoprick of Glasgow ; and sent a letter to the King bearing their reasons wherefore they cotdd not consent that Mr Eobert Pont should accept the bishoprick of Caithnesse, as his Majesty would have had him, to wit, because that corrupt estate or office of these who had hitherto been called Bishops was not agreeable to the Word of God, and had been damned in divers other AssembUes. It was ordained by this Assembly, that aU pastors, of whatsoever sort, be subject to the tryaU and censure of their brethren, as weU of the Presbytries as of SynodaU and GeneraU AssembUes ; that masters of colleges and schools shaU receave none of mature age, tUl they subscribe the Confession of Faith, and communicat, nor promove them to any degree tiff they 56 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION subscribe de novo, under the pain of the censures of the Kirk. In their instructions given to such as were appointed by them to at tend upon the King and the Parliament, they enjoine them to ad mitt nothing hurtfuU or prejudiciaU to the discipUne of the Kirk, as it was concluded, according to the Word of God, by the Gene raU AssembUes preceeding the fourscore four year ; but precisely to seek the same to be ratified and aUowed, if possible it may be. Little more could be obtained by their commissioners at the Par hament, but the first point, to wit, That nothing was done preju dicial!. The Lords thought they had done a great benefit to the Kirk in that, that bishopricks, abbacies, and priories, were annexed to the Crowne ; for, by this means, [it was] thought we should not be troubled again with the bishops. Ei the nixt Assembly, which was holden in February nixt fol lowing, Mr Patrick Adamsone, for that present diseased, was delated for sundry things, and deprived of his commissionrie, and Mr Thomas Buchanan appointed commissioner tUl the nixt As sembly. Commission was given to the Presbytrie of Edinburgh to summond him before them, to answer for solemnizing the mar riage of the Earle of Huntly, without subscription to the Confes sion of Faith, and other offences ; and to censure him. Mr Eobert Montgomery having satisfied the Kirk, the Assembly findeth he may be admitted to a flock where he hath not been scandalous, providing he be found qualified in life and doctrine. At a convention of ministers in January 1589, or, after the old accompt, 1588, some were appointed to traveU with the King for his subscription de novo to the Confession of Faith, now in his perfect age, and to renew the charge given in his minority to all his subjects to subscribe of new again, which was also obtained. A commission was given by act of CounseU, after the Assembly, holden in March 1590, to some ministers to receave de novo the subscriptions of noblemen, barrons, gentlemen, and other subjects, to the GeneraU Band for the mantainance of religion and the Con fession of Faith, w Inch was put to execution ; and the Confession of Faith was subscribed by persons of aU estates the second tyme. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 57 La the Assembly holden after the King's return out of Denmark, in August 1590, he praised God that he was borne in such a time as in the time of the Ught of the gospeU, to such a place as to be King in such a Kirk, the sincerest Kirk in the world. " The Kirk of Geneva," said he, " keepe Pasch and YuUle. What have they for them ? They have no institution for them. As for our neigh bour Kirk of England, their service is an iU said masse in Inglish. They want nothing of the masse but the liftings. I charge you, my good people, ministers, doctors, elders, nobles, gentlemen and barrons, to stand to your purity, and to exhort the people to do the like ; and I, forsooth, so long as I bruik my life and crowne, shaU maintain the same against aU deadly." Ther was nothing heard for a quarter of an hour, but praising of God. and praying for the King. At this Assembly it was ordained by common consent of the whole brethren, that whosoever hath borne, presently bearetb, or hereafter shaU bear office of the ministrie in the Kirk within this realme, be charged by every particular Presbytrie, wher they are resident, to subscrive the heads of the discipUne of the Kirk within this realme, at length sett downe and aUowed by the act of the whole Assembly, in the Book of Policie, which is registrat in the Eegister of the Kirk ; and, namely, the heads controverted be twixt us and the enemies to that discipUne, betwixt and the nixt SynodaU Assembly [of the provinces,] under pain of excommunica tion, to be execut against the non-subscribers ; and that the Pres bytries which shaU be found remisse and negUgent herein shaU receave pubhct rebuik from the General Assembly ; and that the Moderator of every Presbytrie receave from the Clerk of the As sembly a coppie of the said Book, under his subscription, upon the expenses of the Presbytrie, betwixt and the first day of Sep tember, under the pain to be accused openly in the face of the Assembly. La this Assembly was likewise concluded, as foUoweth : " Forasmuch as it is with common consent of the whole brethren of the Assembly resolved, that where the Presbytries are well and orderly constitut, the yearly election and nomination of visitors 58 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION over countreyes hitherto customably observed in the Assembly, is not necessary nor expedient ; the same Presbytries, having esta blished in themselves a sufficient power, to send out of their own number some instructed with their commission, pro re natd, to take order with such things as faU out in their bounds : Therefor, it is thought meet, and concluded, That the said yearly election of commissioners over countreys where Presbytries are weU and suffi ciently constitute, shaU cease in tyme coming. And where befor the said commissioners did bear the charge to enroU the ministers and their stipends at the platt, receave presentations, and give coUations thereupon, designe manses and gleibs, That the said well constitut Presbytries, every one of them, shaU yearly (ay and while the necessity craveth) elect and choose out of their owne number a brother, in name of the whole Presbytrie, for enrolling and ex- peding their stipends at the platt ; designe manses and gleibs with in the bounds of the said Presbytry ; and in aU things concerning the execution of his commission to be countable and subject to the judgment and censure of the Presbytrie, and that aU presentations be directed in tyme comeing to the Presbytrie where the benefice lyeth. Alwise, in admission and deprivation of ministers in Buchan, Aberdeen, Garrioch and Marre, that Buchan and Aber deen proceed with mutuaU advise in admission and deprivation of ministers, and likewise Marre and Garioch ; and in case of variance, that the matter be remitted to the Assembly." Some of those that were at this Assembly, have sensyne accept ed bishopricks : Mr NeiU CampbeU, after Bishop of Argyle ; Mr Peter Blackburn, after Bishop of Aberdeen ; Mr Patrick Lindsay, after Bishop of Eosse, now Bishop of Glasgow ; Mr George Glad stones, after Bishop of Saint Andrews ; Mr James Nicolson, after Bishop of DunkeU ; Mr George Grahame, after Bishop of Dum- blane, now Bishop of Orkney ; Mr William Couper, after Bishop of GaUoway ; Mr David Lindsay, minister at Leith, after Bishop of Eosse; Mr John Spotswood, after Bishop of Glasgow, now Bishop of St Andrews. The King was so vexed with complaints upon Mr Patrick OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 59 Adamson, lying registrat at the horn for debt, and so ashamed of him, because he was so odious, that he rejected him, and disponed his hferent to the Duke of Lennox. The miserable Bishop feU into poverty and sicknesse, and was forced to crave support by Mi- Andrew Melvill. He sent to the Presbytrie of St Andrews and desired to be absolved from the sentence of excommunication. Some brethren were sent to him to try him. He cryed often and pittifuUy to Mr James Melvill, " Loose me, for Christ's sake." At their report he was absolved. Mr John Caldcleugh presented, in his name, to the Synod of Fife, which was holden in Aprile 1591, his Eecantation in certain articles. Some were directed to him to crave a more clear and ample recantation in the vulgar tongue ; which he did, and sub scribed with his owne hand. * It was read in the GeneraU Assembly holden in July nixt foUowing. At the Assembly, holden in July, in respect the greatest part of the Presbytries had not satisfied the ordinance of the last Ge neraU Assembly, touching subscription to the Book of Policie, it was ordained that the former act be observed and put in execution with the rest, betwixt and the nixt Assembly. La the Assembly holden in May 1592, it was thought good that this article be presented amongst others to the King, because of the approaching Parhament, to wit, That the Acts of Parhament made in the year of God 1584, against the discipUne and Uberty of the Kirk, be annulled, and the same discipline, whereof the Kirk hath been in practice, ratified. The terror of BothweU's remaining in the countrey; the horror of the fact at Dunnibirsle, yet recent in men's minds, partly because the Earle of Murray's corps was lying in Leith kirk yet unburied, partly by reason of pubhct rebuike and threatning from pulpit; and the better expeding of BothweU's for- faultrie, procured at the nixt Parliament, farr by the expectation of the ministry, an act for ratification of the liberty of the true Kirk, of GeneraU and SynodaU AssembUes, of Presbytries and Sessions; * See Adamson's Recantation, in Row's History, Wodrow Society edit. pp. 118-31. 60 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION and of their jurisdiction and discipUne for aU tymes to come ; and for abrogation of aU acts, statutes and canons, made of before in the contrair; and that aU presentation to benefices be directed there after to particular Presbyteries to give coUations thereupon. This is the first act of the twelth Parhament of King James the Sixth, and was sent from the King to the GeneraU Assembly holden in April 1593, as a great gift, as it was indeed, if he had suffered them still to enjoy it. At this Assembly, which was holden in AprUe 1593, the names of aU the Presbytries were given up, viz. DingwaU, KirkwaU, Thurso, Dornoch, Taine, the Channorie of Eosse, Invernesse, Forresse, Elgin, Euthven, Bamff, Deir, Innerourie, Aberdeen, Kincardine, Cowie, Brechin, Arbroth, Meigle, Dundee, Dunkelden, Perth, Dumblane, St Andrews, Cowper, Dumferling, Kirkaldie, Stirling, Linhthghow, Edinburgh, Dalkeith, Haddingtoune, Dum- bar, Peebles, Chirnside, Dunce, Jedburgh, Melrosse, Drumfreis, Kirkudbright, Wightoun, Air, Eving, Pasley, Dumbartoune, Glas gow, HamUton, Lanark. These were the townes whereunto the ministers of the kirks nixt adjacent resorted every week for exer cise of prophesie, by course, and exercising of discipline. The seat of the Presbytrie might not be changed without the deter mination of the GeneraU Assembly, as the act made in October 1581 beareth. What matters were treated in Presbytries the reader may find in the first act of the 12th Parhament; or, to be short, they put in execution the acts of SynodaU and General Assemblyes ; exerced the ordinar jurisdiction of admitting, suspending, depriving minis ters within their bounds ; excommunicating, or aUowing, or com manding obstinat impenitents to be excommunicat, or absolving the penitent ; of visiting particular kirks vrithin their bounds, re ceaving complaints from ministers and other members of particular kirks : what jurisdiction the Diocesian, that is, the bastard Bishop, had over aU the kirks and ministers of the diocie ; that a company of pastors, or divine and apostolicaU bishops had over every one of the number severally, and their congregations committed to OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 61 their charge, consociat togither under that Presbytry, without con- trolment of any bishop, tUl the Assembly holden at Glasgow 1610 : Therefor, of necessity, their meeting behoved to be frequent for exercising discipUne, and so their custome was to meet weekly. Nor yet was ther any superiority of any one of the number above the rest; but only priority of order in the person of him who was to moderate, and only so long as he was to moderate, that is, for halfe a year, to wit, from their SynodaU Assembly to the nixt SynodaU Assembly, as was determined in AprUe 1582. The Moderator was chosen only by the brethren of the Presby trie, which order endured tiU that pretended Assembly which was holden at LinUthgow 1606. Visitation of any particular kirk within the bounds of the Presbytrie was not tyed to the Modera tor, nor was it thought meet in Aprile 1582, but that the Pres bytrie direct two or moe to that effect, as they should see expe dient. Nor was it thought expedient then that the Presbytrie should be astricted to direct their Moderator to the GeneraU As sembly as their commissioner; but that they have liberty to send such of their number as they thought meetest for the weel and comfort of the Kirk. SynodaU Assemblyes consisted not of some commissioners from Presbytries, but the whole brethren of the Presbytries belonging to any Synod, conveened not in one certain place, but in the place appointed by the last Synod. After the last Moderator had ended his exhortation they proceeded to the election of another. These Synods were holden twice in the year, and had power over the Presbytries. Every Presbytrie by course was tryed by the rest, and rebuiked for negligence or commended for their dihgence. E^ any of their number deserved to be censured, he was tryed, sus pended, or deposed. They receaved complaints upon, or appeUa- tions from Presbytries, if any were. As occasion required, they aggreed upon articles to be proponed to the nixt GeneraU Assem bly, &c. The GeneraU Assembly was holden twice in the year, tiU the year 1584, and after once, (except in the troublsome times anno 1584 and 1585,) tiU the 1604th year. The Moderator was 62 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION chosen at every Assembly. It consisted of Commissioners from burghs, and shyres, and Presbytries. Seeing pastors are equaU in power by God's ordinance, that government cannot be lawfull which brings in superiority of one above others. Whereas that paritie in power is charged with anarchie and confusion, it is an unjust imputation, proceeding from malice or ignorance ; for, notwithstanding of this paritie amongst pastors considered severaUy, ther is a subordination of deacons to elders, of elders to pastors ; nixt a subordination and subjection of sessions or elderships of particular kirks to Presbytries, of Pres bytries to Synods, of Synods to the NationaU Assembly. Thirdly, Every pastor is subject to the joint feUowship of pastors in Pres bytries, Synods, or NationaU Assemblyes. Fourthly, Ther is a priority of order, in that ther is one to be President or Moderator in every meeting or Assembly. It is not then loose or single, but a compact paritie ordered, as said is, that we allow. This comely order preserveth that paritie which God hath aUowed to be amongst pastors, considered with respect of one to another severaUy, and is more convenient for the Kirk of God than the superiority of Diocesian Bishops. It cannot be denyed, but many eyes see better then one, either in trying ministers or finding out of hereticks, or devising remedies for eviUs, or examining delin quents. Nixt, put the case, the sight of one may be sharper than of many ; yet many having equaU power are not so easUy corrupted to pervert discipUne and judgment, as one judging and ruling by his sole power, or with power by his negative voice to frustrat the voices of many. One that is a stranger and no kindly pastor may be more easUy induced to wink at hereticks ; to admitt or to- lerat unworthy and vitious ministers ; to suffer Atheisme or Poprie to grow, than a number of pastors watching over their owne flocks. The zeaU of one stirreth up the coldness of another, and his zeaU is tempered by the mildnesse of a thud. The contempt of the world in one beareth downe the covetousnesse of some worldling1. The grace and gifts of God to diverse persons, like sundry ingredients in one salve, meet togither and temper one another. It is expedient, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 63 say politicians, that in Synods or Assemblies, ther be some like Cato, Appius Claudius, or the like, to correct with their severity the gentle voices of others. 3dly, WU1 not the kindly pastors be more carefull and vigUant for the weeU of their owne flocks, than an idle sheepherd sett over them with a generaU oversight, and at the appointment of men ? 4thly, Is ther not greater liberty, and, consequently, sincerer government where men may utter their minde freely in propounding, reasoning, voting, when aU are of equaU power, than when one hath power to present others to be nefices, to give coUation, prefer, transferr ? or, on the other side, to depresse, vex, and persecut ? 5thly, Is it not more convenient for the ease of God's people, that causes be pleaded, offences tryed, and offenders censured, where the offence is committed, without charges to parties or witnesses, and with expedition, than to trouble the subjects with travelling to the Bishop, and to stay upon his tryaU and determination ? 6thly, Is not that government mor con venient for the Kirk, where no man is exeemed from censur, then where prelats rule without controlment, either of Presbytries or Synods, and from whose censur they are exeemed, or of GeneraU Assemblyes, which are not holden but when it pleaseth them, and are overruled by them, when they are holden ? It is often aUedged, that parity is subject to schisme and breed ing of heresies; but I answer, That may be true, where parity is not qualified and ordered with the subordination and subjection above mentioned, but every man is suffered to hve as he Ust ; but where it is ordered, as said is, experience in our owne Kirk is a sufficient evidence of the most powerfuU mean to suppresse schisme and heresie : and that was the reason King James aUedged, to an In- ghsh divine, wherfor our Kirk was never troubled with heresie ; " for if," said he, " it sprang up in a paroch, there was ane eldership to suppresse it ; if it had escaped them, the Presbytrie was ready to crush it ; if the Presbytry should be neghgent, then the Synod was to see to it ; if it had not been then suppressed, the GeneraU As sembly had taken strick order concerning it." But we never heard that any error was so obstinatly mantained, that it was brought to 64 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION the censure of a Synod, let be of the GeneraU Assembly, but only of Mr Eobert Montgomery, and Mr Patrick Adamsone, usurping bishops, and Mr Thomas Hepburn, who held that the souls of the faithfuU, after departure, do not enter into the joyes of heaven, tiU the day of judgment ; yet he was suspended, and after confer ence with such as were appointed to conferr with him, he corrected his opinion. The like proof we have in the Kirk of France ; and if the Eeformed Kirk of the Low Countreyes had enjoyed the liberty of sett and ordinary GeneraU AssembUes, as the Kirk of Scotland did, and of France doth, Arminianisme had not gotten head amongst them. If that extraordinary NationaU CounseU had not been holden at Dort, in aU likelyhood it had prevaUled. But Epis copal! government hath bred or intertained schisme, heresie, tyr- ranny. E a presbyter had hatched a heresie, it was soon suppres sed, unlesse a bishop had taken the patrocinie ; but if a bishop had hatched a heresie, or had taken upon him the defence of an heresie hatched by another, he drew commonly the whole diocie after him, and so the heresie was spred farr and wyde. Therefor, when the universaU bishop was sett up, the generaU apostacie foUowed. The whole world hath been shaken with contentions for preferment of Bishops, Patriarchs and Popes to their places, so that we may justly averr, that the superiority of bishops hath been the knife which hath cutted the strings of concord and peace. The ethnick Emperors have not been greater persecutors, then lordly Prelates. If we wUl cast our eyes upon our neighbour Church, there we shall find Famuhsts, Anabaptists, Lutherans, Arminians, and preachers themselves, popishly affected; sound and orthodox preachers and prefessors sffenced, imprisoned, banished, or otherwayes hardly used. Since the ring of equality among pastors in our Kirk was broken, and the Uberty of holding Assemblies was reft from her, a fearfuU schisme hath entered, with obtruding Popish ceremonies. Poprie and Arminianisme are taught in kirks and schooles, and none so easily preferred to bishopricks or inferior places, as Arminians and Popish preachers, which in end wUl draw the whole body to apostasie and defection, which is more dangerous then schisme. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 65 THE FIFTH COURSE IS OF THE EPISCOPALL GOVERNMENT WHICH NOW HOLDETH BT USURPATION AND VIOLENCE. We shaU first sett downe the occasion of the alteration ; nixt, the steps and means whereby they ascended to their height; and, thirdly, their carriages and practices after. The occasion or irritant cause of the alteration of the Church Government was not, as is aUedged by many, the blind Tumult which was raised in Edinburgh upon the 17th of December 1596, as appeareth by the deduction foUowing : — The beauty of our Kirk, both for purity of doctrine and order of discipUne, was become admirable to the best Eeformed Kirks. The Assemblyes of the faithftdl were never so glorious and comfortable; the ParochinaU and ClassicaU Elderships, ProvinciaU and Nation aU Synods never of greater authority then in the begining of the year 1596; after that the apostat Earles, Angus, Huntly and Arrol, traffiquers with the King of Spain, were excommunicat, and at the procurement of the Kirk and Queen of England were, for their unnaturaU conspiracie with the Spaniard, forfaulted and ex- peUed out of the countrey. Yea her chief care was, to search out the sins of the land, abuses, and corruptions, in whatsoever state, calhng or judicatory, that they may be repented for and amended, and to advert to the safetie and preservation of rehgion, and the Uberties of the Kirk, which, at this tyme, requyred opposition to the re-entry and restoration of those Earles. Whereupon, in the Assembly holden in the end of March 1596, were drawne up the corruptions and enormities found in Ministers, their caUings and conversations ; offences in the King and Queen's House ; in Courts and Judgment-Seats, and in persones of aU Estates ; the catalogue whereof, for brevity, I omitt. Upon Tues day, the 30th of March, they had an humUiation in the East Kirk of Edinburgh, caUed the Little Kirke, where were present four hunderth persons, ministers and other commissioners and profes sors. Within an hour they looked with another countenance nor that wherewith they entered, being moved with Mr John David- 66 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION son's exhortations. Such sighs and groans for their sins were not heard at any other fast since the Eeformation, for any immi nent danger ; and tears [were] shed in such aboundance, that the place might justly be caUed Bochim. They testified their entering in a new league with God, by holding up their hands. E we compare those times with the present, what need have we of humi- Uation for our fearfuU revolting, and many grosse sins which durst not then sett up their head? It was ordained, that the like solemne humiliation for their sins and neghgence, with protestation to walk more warrily in their wayes, and more dUigently in their charges, be observed in the SynodaU AssembUes ; and that so many as it shaU happen to be absent observe the like at their Presbyteries : but it was not universally put in execution. Their care was nixt to advert that the Kirk be not endangered by the externaU enemie. In their greeves to be presented to the King, they humbly meant, that to the grieffe of aU good men, the hazard of rehgion and of the peace of the countrey, the forfaulted Earles enjoy their lands and Uvings as peaceably, and to their greater advantage than when they were at his Majestie's peace within the countrey; and their confederats and friends, partakers and assis- ters with them and their treasonable attempts, are suffered to have so great liberty ; never having so much as once entered their per sons in waird, nor given surety, nor pledges for their good and dutifuU behaviour, in caise it shaU happen the said rebeUs, or any other forraigne enemies to repair within the countrey for disquyet- ing of the estate thereof; as if they had exemption from aU lawes to strengthen themselves, for strengthening the hands of the ene mies, when they shaU happen to arrive, as it appeareth to be their intention, by preparation of forces, and armour, and leagues of friendship, which they are dayly binding up, &c. And commission was likewise given to some brethren of the ministery to assemble themselves, as they should find urgent occasion, to consult, reason and advise upon, and propone articles to the King for preventing of all dangers which in aU likelyhood might fall to the state of reh gion. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 67 The devUl, envying the happinesse and laudable proceedings of our Kirk, stirred up both Papists and politicians to disturb her peace and to deface her beauty. The Papists perceaved that there was no rest for them in Scotland, if the authority which the Kirk had, continued. PoUticians feared their craft and trade, which is to use indifferently aU sorts of men and means to attain to their owne ends, and to sett themselves up in the throne of Christ, should be undone. About this tyme, were appointed by the King and Coun seU eight to be Commissioners of the Exchecquer, who, by the peo ple, were caUed Octavians, viz. Alexander Seaton, President of the Session, Mr John Lindsay of Balcarras, Mr James Elphingstoun, one of the Senators of the CoUedge of Justice, after Lord Balme- rino, Walter Stewart, Prior of Blantyre, Sir David Carnegie, now Earle of Southesk, Mr John Skeen, Clerk of Eegister, Mr Thomas HamUton, the King's Advocate, now Earle of Haddingtoun, Mr Peter Young, the King's Eleemosyner. To these was committed the care of the King's rents, propertie and casuahties, because the King was superexpended through the default of those who had the charge in former tymes. Huntly returneth secretly in the month of June, whereof the King was advertised soon after in July. The Lady Huntly by her moyen, procured a Convention of diverse of the nobihty and others, the Earle's speciaU favourers, which was holden in Falkland in August. Offer was made in his owne name, and it was concluded that it should be leissum to him to return and remain in the coun trey, upon the performance of such conditions as his Majesty should propone to be performed by him; notwithstanding that Master Andrew Melvill, Mr James Melvill, Mr James Nicolson, Mr Pa trick GaUoway, Mr David Lindsay, and other ministers who were present, protested in the contrair, in respect it could neither stand with the King's credit to propone or hearken to any condi tions, tiU first it were made manifest that he were out of the coun trey, as these who suited for him did aUedge ; nor could it stand with the surety of religion and peace of the country, in respect his apostacie, which was the ground of the excommunication, or his e 2 68 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION conspiracie with the Spainiard, the ground of his forfaultour, were not yet acknowledged offences by him. Another Convention was holden at Dumferling in September, wher the conditions wer ag- gried upon, which were offered to him without consent of the mi nistery. ErroU returneth the same moneth of September. Diverse of their friends and favourers vaunted that they had procured al ready his Majestie's protection and peace, past and subscribed in CounseU, and that they looked assuredly for advancement to offices, charge of guards, and Ueutenentries as they had befor. Some of the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly, and some other ministers Conveening in Cowper, directed some of their num ber to Falkland to the King, to wit, Mr Andrew Melvill, Mr James Melvill, Mr James Nicolson and Mr Patrick GaUoway, to crave that the dangerous enterprises of the enemies might be prevented. The King seemed offended at their meeting and commission ; but Mr Andrew Melvill answered, with great liberty and boldnesse, " Sir, ther ar two Kings and two kingdoms in Scotland ; Christ is a King, and the Kirk is his kingdom. You are a subject to Christ and a member of his Church, neither Head nor King. The spirituall office-bearers to whom he hath committed the government of his Church, hath power and warrand to conveen, which you ought not to controU or discharge, but assist. Sir, when you were in your suadling clouts, Christ reigned freely in this land, and in despite of the enemies the office-bearers had their meetings. Their meet ing hath been steadable to you, when the enemies were seeking your destruction ; and yet, now when ther is such a necessity urg ing them, you vriU find fault with their conveening. The wisdome of your CounseU, which is devilish and pernicious, is this : Because the Ministers and Protestants are too strong and control the King, they must be weakened and brought low, by stirring up a partie against them, and then -the King being indifferent for both, both shah see to him, and so he shall be weU served, grow in grandeur and attain to his purpose. But this wisdome may prove foUy, and, in serving both, you shaU lose the hearts of both." The King at last settled, and dimitted them pleasantly, promising, that howbeit OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 69 the Estates had Ucenced them to make their offers, they should not be receaved tiU they wer out of the countrey again, and offer what they wold, they should get no grace at his hand, tUl they have sa tisfied the Church. They were suffered, notwithstanding, to re- maine and traveU with their friends for reconciliation. The Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly and Commissioners from diverse Synods, conveened at Edinburgh upon the 20th of October, as was appointed befor at Cowpar. It was thought ex pedient, that a number of commissioners be appointed for every quarter of the countrey ; of which number one for every quarter shaU have ordinarie residence in Edinburgh monthly, by course, to communicat such advertisements as shaU be directed from diverse parts of the countrey, and to consult upon the most expedient in every case. Mess. Eobert Bruce, Eobert Pont, David Lindsay, James Balfour, Patrick Galloway, Walter BalcanqueU, ministers within the Presbytrie of Edinburgh, were appointed to conveen alwayes and ordinarUy with them. This meeting was caUed the CounseU of the Kirk. From this Convention likewise were sent to the Presbytries informations of the dangers arising from the re turning and remaining of the forfaulted Earles ; and for remedies, the ministers were desired to make the professors sensible of the dan ger, to keep a pubhck humiliation the first Sabbath of December, to urge an amendment in aU estats, beginning at themselves, to intimat solemnly in aU their kirks the excommunieation of the apostat Earles, to proceed with the censures of the Kirk summarly, upon one citation, against such as intertain any seerecie with them, or take any deahng for them, quia pemclitatar salus ecclesiae et reipublicce. November was appointed to be the first moneth. Upon the 9th day of November, these who conveened directed Mess. David Lindsay, Patrick GaUoway, James Nicolson, and James Melvill to the King, to desire his Majesty to declare what it was that moved him to take so hardly with the ministers, and to pro- pond their greevances. Upon the 11th of November, they re port to the brethren the King's answers : That there could be no good agreement betwixt him and the ministers tiU the marches 70 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION of their jurisdiction were redd ; that they should not speak of the affairs of State or CounseU in pulpit ; that the GeneraU Assembly should not be conveened but by his authority and speciaU com mand; that Synods, Presbytries, and particular sessions, medle with no causes whereupon his laws strike, but fornication and such like slanders ; that he wold be satisfyed touching these and such like heads. As for answer to their greevances, That he had granted nothing to the excommunicat Earles, but that which his Counsell and Estates thought needful for the peace of the realme, and upon condition that they satisfy the Kirk ; that the Lady Huntly who was to come to the baptisme of his daughter, was a good discreet lady ; Papists may be honest folks ; his mother was a Papist, and yet ane honest woman ; that the Lady Livingstoun should satisfy the Kirk, or else not come near to his daughter, but he could not refuse to concredit her to the Lord Livingstoune. And that they replyed, That the free rebuik of sin, without respect of per sons, was warranted by God's Word ; that ministers speak alwayes reverently of his Majesty, but could not spare the enemies, nor deaU with any favourable deaUing used toward them ; that the dis cipline of our Kirk was estabhshed, after many conferences, upon evident grounds of the Word of God, by bis Majestie's lawes and Acts of Parhament, and use and practice foUowing ; that his Ma jestie should not have permitted any favour to be granted to the forfaulted Earles, tUl they had been out of the countrey, and that all these tokens of favour shewed to Papists moved good men to sus pect his Majestie ; that if the Lady Huntly come to the baptisme, the pulpits could not but sound against it ; that the committing of his daughter to the Lady Livingstoun's custody would be esteemed a speciaU pledge of his Majestie's favour to Papists. When the Brethren heard this report, they perceaved clearly that the overthrow of the liberty of Christ's kingdome was intend ed, and were glade that the King had uttered his mind so plainly. They thought meet that the Presbytries should be advertised, and brethren exhorted to study diligently the grounds of the discipline, and advertised, not to reason upon the articles which shaU be sent OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 71 to them from the King, tiU the brethren of the CounseU were ad vised ; for they feared to caU in doubt the undoubted DiscipUne of Christ's Kirk. Here ye may see the alteration of the Discipline was intended befor the 17th of December; and I have heard, that the King had a roU of the names of such ministers as he purposed to preferr to bishopricks before the falling furth of the 17th day. The same day, the 11th of November, they wer certainly in formed, that Mr David Black, minister at St Andrews, was to be charged to compear before the King and his CounseU for some words uttered by him, in some of his sermons in the moneth of October last bypast. The day foUowing, the brethren above named were directed to the King to understand what wer the doubts and questions his Majesty said, he had to propone touching the bound ing of the office and caUing of the ministery ; and to advertise his Majesty that it was hardly taken, that the ministers of God's Word should be charged and troubled upon calumnies and triffling delations, when, in the meantyme, the enemies of the truth were favoured and overseen. They reported, the 15th day, that they had gotten no good answer, because his owne minister, Mr Patrick Galloway, had said to him in privat conference, that the Kirk gott but fair words and promises without effect, but the enemies got the deeds. Yet the same brethren, Mr Patrick excepted, were directed again to in sist earnestly upon this point, That the common enemy be taken order with, befor any controversie be intended against the Kirk or any of the brethren ; otherwayes, to let him understand that aU the world wold say, Nothing was intended but to benefite the enemy and to trouble the Kirk. The King answered, He thought not much of that matter, only let Mr David compear, and, if he be innocent, purge himselfe in judgment ; but take heed ye decline not my judicatorie ; for if you do so, it wUl be worse. The bre thren, notwithstanding, conveening upon the 17th day, perceav- ing the drift of the King and CounseU was, by this preparative, to draw ministers' doctrine under their censure and controhnent ; and, remembering that sundry declinatures of this nature, given in be- 72 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION for by good brethren, were forgotten or denyed, because they were only verbaU, resolved upon a declinature in writ, fortified by good reason, and to be subscribed by themselves with Mr David, be cause the cause was common. Mr David compeared, and gave in his declinature upon the 18th day. Upon the 20th day it was thought needfuU that a coppie of the declinature be sent to every Presbitrie, to be subscribed by aU their members, together with a letter, requesting them to return it subscribed befor the first of December, or, with aU possible diUgence, with any of their most wise and faithfuU brethren, who were able to assist them in so weighty matters, and withaU desiring every one to study diligently this question, and the whole pointes of the discipline ; for certainly Satan was to make an onsett on this hedge of the Lord's vineyard, that he may thereafter destroy and waste the plants thereof at his pleasur. Dihgence was used in gathering subscriptions, so that in short space the hands of about four hunder were put to it. None so diligent as Spotswood, now Bishop of St Andrews, howbeit even then he reveaUed to the King aU their counsells and proceedings, either by himselfe or by a courtier with whom he was famUiar. He was the only suspected or known Judas among the ministery at that time. Ther were some others hke Hazael, that understood not their own hoUow hearts tiU time discovered them. Upon the 24th of November the Commissioners of the Generall Assembhe, being for the most part present, and informed that they were to be charged to depart off the towne, with advise of the Coun seU of the brethren, resolved, seeing they were conveened by war rant from Christ and his Kirk, in so dangerous a time, to see that the Kirk receaved no detriment, to stay, notwithstanding of any charge, so long as it should be found expedient. Yet it was thought expedient to direct Mr David Lindsay, Mr Eobert Bol lock, and Mr James MelviU, to the King, to show him what great inconveniences might ensue, he entering in hard deaUing with the Kirk, and dischargeing the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assem blie ; to beseech him to desist from all persute of Mr David Black, and all controversies arising thereby till order were taken with the OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 73 common enemy, and a GeneraU Assembly convocat for deciding of aU controversies, and answering to aU his greeves and questions ; and to move him to consider the danger wherein the countrey standeth, by Papists banding themselves togither, associating to themselves diverse clannes, preparing armor and horse, &c. They reported the day foUowing his answer, That he was sorry that matters should have so faUen out betwixt him and the Commis sioners; yet if they would passe from the declinature, at least make a declaration that it was not generaU, but particular, and used in that cause of Mr David Black, being a cause of slander pertaining of right to the Kirk, he wold passe from the summonds, and aU persute of Mr David. Whereupon diverse formes of a declaration were devised, but [they] could not find one which they thought wold content the King. In end, they condescended upon this offer, that if his Majesty wold passe from the summonds of Mr David Black, and sett downe an act of reference of all persute of the said Mr David, and cease from charging of ministers for their preaching, tiU a lawfull GeneraU Assembly were convocat, they, on the other part, would take up the declinature, and cease to Use the same tiU the said Assembly. The brethren directed to the King report, upon the 27th day, how they had spent much tyme in reasoning with his Majestie, but could not aggrie, unlesse the Commissioners wold passe from the declinature, and cause Mr David Black answer and acknowledge their judicatory; but they wold not undertake it. Upon the same day, the 27th of November, Mr David Black was of new summoned with proclamation and sound of trumpet, at the crosse, for speeches uttered by him in his sermons, within these three years last bypast. Because that sometymes barons and others satt with the ministers, aU the leidges were discharged likewise by proclamation to assemble themselves at the desire of the ministers, Presbytries, or other ecclesiasticaU judgments, under pretence of assisting them in their defence, being accused of any cause, crime, or offence, or when they repair to any judgment seat, or otherwise, without his Majestie's licence. Ther wer also letters 74 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION given furth, upon an act of Secret CounseU, chargeing the Commis sioners of the GeneraU Assembly to depart out of the towne within the space of twenty-four hours after the charge, and dischargeing them to conveen any where else. The Commissioners conveen immediately after, and laid the proclamation open befor the Lord, the judge and revenger of such odious imputations as they wer burthened with, in these proclamations, and the charge and usurpa tion of supream authority over the Kirk. They ordained such as were to occupy the pulpits to deaU mightily, by the Word, against the said proclamation and charge, and to use such arguments as might flow from such grounds as they laid downe to them. Upon the 29th of November they resolve to give in some arti cles to the King, and CounseU, the day foUowing, which was the dyet of Mr David's compearance ; wherin they clear themselves of those odious imputations, and crave action to be stayed tiU a law- full GeneraU Assembly should be convocat. They thought it also expedient, in respect of the new UbeUed summonds, a new decli nature be formed and used by Mr David in bis owne name, and in name of the rest of the ministery. Upon the 30th day, the hour approaching, the Commissioners appointed Mr Eobert Bruce, Mr Eobert Pont, Mr Eobert EoUock, Mr David Lindsay, and Mr Patrick GaUoway, to present their ar ticles and to assist Mr David in his action. The rest were exercised in the meantyme, tiU their returne, in confessing their sins, which had procured such trouble, that with penitent hearts and earnest motion of the spirit, they might now pour out their prayers to the Lord. The brethren returning about hah0 hour to one, reported that some had entered in communing with them, and had conde scended upon some grounds of agriement ; that the Commissioners for the. King's part wer to traveU with his Majestie against after noon, and they wer to traveU with the Commissioners. One of the grounds whereupon they condescended was, that they should take up their declinature, and the CounseU their summonds, and use a form of protestation. Afternoon, seeing no appearance of agriement, and the CounseU sitten down, the second declinature OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 75 was given in, wherein Mr David adhered to the first, and fortified it with moe reasons. The articles above mentioned were also pre sented. Mr David was wonderfuUy assisted with courage, wisdome and utterance, and also the brethren who were appointed to assist him, namely, Mr Eobert Bruce. The King and CounseU, notwith standing, past to the interloquitor, and found themselves Judges, competent to aU the parts of the libeU except one, which concerned the rehgion of England ; so scrupulous were they to medle with matters spirituaU and ecclesiasticaU. The brethren after their re turn to the rest, who were excercised in the meantime as before noon, reported what had past. It was thought meet that the doc trine be directed against the interloquitor, as a strong and mighty hold sett up against the freedome of the GospeU, and to give thanks to God for the unity of spirit among themselves. Immediately after the dissolving, the Treasurer and Provest of Edinburgh craved conference with Mr Eobert Bruce and Mr Eo bert EoUock, Mr James Nicolsone, and Mr James MelvUl. They report, that his Majesty, notwithstanding of the interloquitor, meant no extremity against Mr David ; but for entertaining of peace with the Kirk, he wold pardon him, providing they wold bring him downe to his Majestie, and cause him declare the truth in aU the points UbeUed. After deUberation, they answered, E it were Mr David's owne particular or hurt that were in question, or danger, or of any other of the brethren, his Majestie's offer wer thankfully to be accepted ; but it was the Uberty of the GospeU which was greevously wounded in the discipUne thereof, by the proclamations made upon Saturday last, and now in preaching of the Word, by usurping the judicatory therof ; that if the King had taken his life, and of a dusson [dozen] moe, he wold not have wounded the hearts of the brethren and people more deeply, nor have done such injury to Christ. They could no wayes be content unlesse these things were retreated and amended, but wold oppone to such proceedings with the extreame hazard of their Uves. The messengers taking up the weight of the matter were much moved, and returned to the King with their answer. 76 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION The day foUowing a gentleman of the King's Chamber came timously to one of the brethren, and desired the bent of the doc trine might be stayed that day, not doubting but bis Majesty wold satisfie them. It was answered, The edge of the doctrine could not be blunted without evident appearance of amendment of wrongs; yet he went downe to the King accompanied with another brother, who returned and reported his Majestie's mind and offers, to de clare his meaning concerning the two proclamations and the inter loquitor. The brethren rejoiced not a little ; sett downe his offers and mind in writ, amending some points ; and sett downe the arti cles and grounds of agreement, that his Majesty might see if they wer agreeable to» his meaning. The brethren who were directed found him weU content with the articles in effect. He said, he wold agree to the abohshing of those two acts which wer pro clamed, and not suffer them to be imbooked. Farder, of his owne accord, [he] offered to writ to the Presbytries, and to satisfie them concerning the interloquitor, receaving from them a band of duti- fuUnesse in their doctrine, on the other part. As for Mr David Black, let him come downe and declare his conscience concerning the hbeU befor Mr David Lindsay, Mr James Nicolson, and Mr Thomas Buchanan, and thereafter he should be content to do what they thought meet. When they went downe after noon with Mr David they found the King changed. He directed Mr David Lindsay to crave of Mr David Black, that he wold compear befor the CounseU, and there eonfesse an offence done to the Queen at least, and so receave pardon. Mr David refused aUutterly, lest so doing, he should seem to acknowledge them judges of his ser mons, or to approve their proceedings to be lawfull ; [they] having summoned and admitted ignorant and partiaUy affected persons, lying under the dangers of the censures of the Kirk, at his pro curement, to be witnesses, notwithstanding of most ample testi- monialls of Provest, BaiUies, CounseU, Session of the Kirk, the Eector, Dean of Facultie, Principalis of the CoUedge, Eegents, and whole Members of the University, his dayly auditors, wer produced for him, but rejected; but if it wold please his Majestie OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 77 and the CounseU to remitt him to his lawfull and ordinary judge, the EcclesiasticaU Senat, he should depone the truth willing in every point, and underly their censure or ordinance, if found guffty. The King went to CounseU : Mr David not compearing, the depositions of the witnesses wer read, the points of the lybeU found proven, and the punishment referred to the King. The acts above mentioned, the interloquitor and whole processe were registrat. The doetrine sounding after the old manner, the King craved conference again with the «ame brethren. After long reasoning, they returned to the articles and grounds of agriement, and ther wer produced a forme of declaration upon the proclamation ; a declaration anent the charge ; and a missive to the Presbytrie of Edinburgh anent the interloquitor. These brethren, after they had caused diverse things to be amended, receaved them to be com municat with the Commissioners, and other brethren awaiting upon their returning. The formes and declarations, being considered by the Commissioners and CounseU [of] the brethren, were not found sufficient to repair the injuries done, but rather ratified the same. Other formes and declarations wer devised, and the missive to the Presbytrie of Edinburgh, as also their act of dutifull obedience. Sundry conferences past betwixt the King, or some Councillors, and the three brethren above named, but without successe : for upon Wednesday, the 8th of December, the three above named reported to a frequent assembly of brethren come from diverse provinces, joining with the Commissioners, 1. That, anent the forme of a letter sett downe by the brethren which his Majestie should send to the Presbytries, bis Majesty, in presence of the CounseU, refused to accept it, because it imported an indirect annulling of the inter loquitor. 2. Anent the act of the Presbytery of Edinburgh, it was not thought sufficient ; because it contained not a simple band of not speaking against his Majestie and CounseU, but Umited with certain conditions which wold ever come in question, and turn again to the controversie of the judicatory. 3. The formes of proclama tions penned by the brethren were refused, because they imported 78 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION a plain retreating of the former proclamation and acknowledging of an offence. 4. Touching Mr David Black, his Majesty would no- wayes passe from the interloquitor pronounced in his cause, nor. suspend execution of the same tUl a GeneraU Assembly ; but, the punishment being in his wiU, he wold declare it in private to the brethren, which was transportation or suspension for a space. But that they answered, They could not agree to that, for the reasons above rehearsed. That in end his Majestie craved to be resolved [of the truth] of certain speeches uttered by him ; to wit, " that the treachery of his heart was disclosed, and that aU Kings were the devU's bairns ;" that Mr David should choose seven or eight of twenty or twenty-five of his auditors, indifferent men, whose names shaU be given him, that by their deposition, he may be re solved; but that Mr David in the mean desist from preaching. That they answered, They had no commission but to urge the ac ceptation of the formes which the brethren had devised, but they should report the answers to their brethren. Upon the 9th of December, after the report of the thrie brethren was heard, the Commissioners and the rest of the brethren, per- ceaving that ther was nothing but driveing off time, and the common enemies, in the mean time, to compasse their intentions, thought it no wayes expedient to use any further communeing, but to direct some to his Majestie, to let him know how they had humblie sought redresse of the wrongs done to Christ and his kingdom of late by that charge, proclamation, interloquitor and processe against one of their"most faithful brethren ; how they had been most willing to have condescended to any conditions of peace and agreement, tiU the wounds which Christ's kingdom had receaved might have been throughly cured, to the intent both his forces* and the Kirk's autho rity might be sett against the common enemies ; but seeing they were disappointed, that they were free of what should ensue ; but faithfull pastors could not, without treason against their spirituaU King, abstain from fighting against such proceedings with that * That is, His Majesty's forces. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 79 spiritual armour which was given them, potent in God for over throwing these bulworks and mounts erected for the sacking of the Lord's Jerusalem. Upon the 10th of December, Mr David is charged to passe, with in six dayes, north, and to remain be-north the north water tUl his Majesty declared his wiU, under the pain of rebeUion and putting of him to the home. Upon the 11th of December, the Commissioners were certainly informed that ther was a great number of missives written, and ready to be directed through the countrey for caUing a Convention of the Estates and of a GeneraU Assembly, the tenor whereof foUowes : " We greet tou well, As We have ever carryed a speciaUe good wUl to the effectuating the PoUcie of the Kirk, whereanent We have oftentimes had confer ence with the pastors and ministerie ; so We and they, both resolving now in end that the whole Order of the said PoUcie shaU be particu larly condescended and agreed upon, for avoiding sundry questions and controversies that may faU out thereanent, to the slander and danger of rehgion, We have for that effect appointed as weeU a Ge neraU Convention of our Estates, as a GeneraU Assembly of the mi nistery, to hold here in Edinburgh upon. the 5th day of February nixt to come, to treat and resolve anent aU questions standing in controversie or difference between the CivU and EcclesiasticaU judg ment *, or any ways concerning the pohcy and externaU government of the Church. And therfor wUl We effectuaUy desire and request you that ye faiU not, aU excuses sett apart, to be present at our Convention the day and place foresaid precisely, to give your best advise and opinion of that matter, as ye tender the effectuating thereof, the weeU of reUgion and estate, and wUl show yourselfe our dutifuU and weU affected subjects. Swa we committ you to God's protection. From Halyrudhous, the day of December 1596." * Here, and also near the foot of page 73, " judgment" is evidently a mistake for " judicature," or " jurisdiction." 80 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Here the reader may more clearly perceave that ane alteration of the estabhshed government was intended befor the 17th day of December, and that not only the marches of the jurisdiction, CiviU and EcclesiasticaU, were sought to be ridd, but the order of the Pohcie and Church government was to be caUed in question. How beit, afterward, nothing was pretended but the restraint of free ap plication of doctrine, and nfinisters' vote in Parhament to vindicat them from poverty and contempt, because otherwayes strong oppo sition was feared. Upon the 14th day of December the Commissioners of the Gene rall Assembly exhorted the ministers of the Presbytrie of Edinburgh, as they wold answer to God and his Kirk, in so necessary and dangerous a time, to caU befor them such persons of highest rank as are known or may be found to be malicious enemies, and to pro ceed against them to excommunication. The same day, the charge given out befor against the Commission ers of the GeneraU Assembly was proclaimed with sound of trumpet, and put in execution. After advisement, they thought it lawfull to them to disobey such an unlawful charge, but not expedient, and needlesse, seeing after their departure out of the towne, others might succeed and so the work might proceed; and so resolved to depart, committing the cause to God, and the diligent care of the Presby terie of Edinburgh. But fearing that the heavy tentation of poverty might prevaiU with the weaker sort, and draw them on to subscrive a band which might captiously import the King and CounseU's power to judge of ministers' doctrine ; because the King had profess ed the day befor, that such as would not subscribe should want their stipends ; they thought it requisit to send to every Presbytrie a declaration of their proceeding, and with the declaration their letter. The minuts of tlieir proceedings I have already sett downe. In their declaration, they writ plainly, that they were insisting with his Majesty to kythe in action against the forfaulted Earles; [that] he was induced to convert his whole actions against the ministrie with greater intention than he could be moved against the adver saries this long tyme, that so they might be driven to desist from OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 81 prosecuting of their sute against the Papists, and to employ them selves whoUy in defence of the freedom of preaching and discipUne; that the restraint of the freedom of the spirit in the rebuke of sin, was the principaU butt aimed at in this whole action ; because the mysterie of iniquitie which hath been intended, begun, and is going forward, (whether the purpose be to thraU the GospeU by injunc tions, or by a poUcie equivalent to injunctions, or to bring in hberty of conscience, or, if it draw deeper, in Papistrie, which is to be feared for many reasons, and wUl be reveaUed in the owne time), being such as cannot abyd the Ught of reprehension, the only ad vantage of their cause is thought to stand in extinguishing the Ught, which might discover the umawfuUnesse thereof, that so they passe forward in darknesse without aU chaUenge, tUl the truth wer over- throwne. And because that impietie dare not yet be so impudent to crave, in expresse termes, that sin be not rebuked, it is sought only, that his Majesty and CounseU be acknowledged judges in matters civU and criminaU, treasonable and seditious, which shaU be found uttered by any minister in his doctrine, thinking to draw the rebuke of sin in King, CounseU, or their proceedings, under the name of one of these crymes, and, that way, either to restrain the Uberty of preaching, or to punish it under the name of some vice by a pretence of law and justice ; and so, be time, to bind the Word of God, that sin may go forward with Ufted up hands to the highest. Ye see then what was the controversie betwixt the King and the CounciU, and the Ministery. The King wold have the Ministers to hear the offers by the forfaulted Earles, that they might be reconcUed to the Kirk. The ministers urge, on the other side, that they be re moved out of the countrey again, and that he do the duty of a ma gistral., as becometh him, for their treasonable conspiracie; the par don whereof he confessed in the begining was above his reach. Their offers imported conference, but no conversion or acknowledgment of any offence ; nor were [they] made in sincerity, as the event prov ed. This could not be obtained : therfor the pulpits sound against such as favour them, as become faithfull watchmen to discharge F 82 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION their dutie in so dangerous a tyme. PubUct rebuke of pubUct and crying sins was thereupon caUed in question, and the estabhshed discipline ; and so they were driven from the offensive to the defen sive part. The ministrie craved but only the tryaU of ministers in the first instance, for apphcation of doctrine to the rebuke of cor ruptions and public offences, as they ought to have by the Word of God, and practises in former tymes. But it was refused. What sins did reigne in the land, the catalogue drawn up in the last Assembly can bear witnesse : A flood of bloodshed overflowing the land, and deadly feuds arising thereupon ; adulteries ; incests ; un- lawfuU marriages and devorcements, aUowed in judgment ; oppres sion ; blasphemie ; universaU neglect of justice, both in civil and criminaU causes ; remissions for blood, adulteries, incests ; no execu tion against the adherents of the detected enemies, nor the enemies themselves, by imploying their Uvings for resisting of the Spaniard, or other forreigne enemies, whose invasion was feared ; at the same time, the odious murther at Dunibirsle not punished, &c. Had they not reason then to blow the trumpet, and forewarn the people of God's judgments ? And now, when the chief enemyes, forfaulted for an unnaturaU conspiracie, were suffered to returne and remain in the countrey, with hcence, had they not reason to fear danger to re ligion, and to insist, as they did ? Were [it] not for the free re buke of sin and free exercise of discipline, what had been the case either of Kirk or Commonwealth ? The wyld bordermen stood in greater awe of the Presbyteries excommunication nor of letters of horning. I know a nobleman confessed, that he was more affrayed for the Presbytrie's officer nor the officer of amies. Therfbr, upon the 16th day, he [the King] sent for the four ministers of Edinburgh. But Mr Eobert Bruce refused to enter in any farther communing, tiU the Commissioners of the Generall Assembly were recaUed by as pubhct and honest a proclamation, as it was unhonest and calumnious, (so he caUed it,) whereby they were charged to depart. The Secretar, after advisement with the President, promised it should be so. While they were thus under communing, ther was an intention OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 83 to charge twenty-four of the most zealous professors, burgesses of Edinburgh, to depart out of the towne, speciaUy such as did watch in the night for the safetie of their pastors. For some of the Cubi- culars, envying the Octavians, who had gotten the manageing of the King's rents, whereby they were disappointed of great pensions, advertised the ministers to be upon their guard night and day ; and, on the other side, gave the like advertisment to the chief of the Octavians to keep their gates shutt : And so oyl was cast upon the flame which was already kindled. The chief Octavians wer Presi dent Seaton, Sir James Elphingstoune, Mr Thomas HamUton, the King's Advocat, and Secretar Lindsay. The chief Cubiculars were Sir George Home, after Earle of Dunbar, Sir Patrick Murray, and his brother David Murray, afterwards Lord Scoone, both brethren of the house of Balvard. Upon the 17th day of December the charge was execute upon one of the twenty-four. Mr Walter BalcanqueU, being advertised befor he went to the pulpit, laid forth befor the people the whole proceedings betwixt the King, and the Octavians, and them ; and, according to the warrant he had of the Kirk, he requested the barons and gentlemen who wer present, and others weeU affected, to conveen in the Little Kirk, and to consult how the imminent dan ger to rehgion may be averted. After they were conveened, Mr Eobert Bruce had ane exhortation, and laid forth the present dan gers ; and, thereupon, desired those who were present to hold up their hands, and swear to the defence of rehgion which was then presently professed. Thereafter, they directed two noblemen, Lords Lindsay and Forbesse, two barons, Barganie and Blairwhan, two of the towne baiUies, to the King, with certain articles, for redres sing of wrongs done to the Kirk, and preventing of imminent dan gers. Mr Eobert Bruce was desired to accompany them, and pro pone the matter. Hearing that the King was come up to the Tol- booth, they went to him and found him in the Upper house. " Sir," said Mr Eobert, " The barons, gentlemen, and brethren presently conveened, apprehending the danger imminent to religion by hard dealhng against the ministry, and zealous professors, have directed f2 84 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION some of their number to your Maj esty ." " What appearance is there of danger," said the King ? " The burgesses best affected to reh gion," said Mr Eobert, " are under communing, charged to depart out of the towne ; the Lady Huntly is intertained at Court ; and ther is vehement suspicion that her husband is near at hand." u. But what have ye to do with that ?" answered the King, and with that parteth from him, drawen, as appeared, by the President and others who wer about him. They returne to the rest, who were in the meantime exercised in hearing the Word read, and reported thus : " We went to his Majestie as ye desired us, but wer not weU accepted, nor our greivances receaved, and so ye have to consider what is next to be done." It was thought meet to reserve their greivances to a better tyme, and, in the meantime, to knitt up a covenant with the Lord, to stand to their profession and defence of the good cause, to their last breath ; wherunto aU agreed, and testifyed their agreement by holding up their hands. Ther was a great applause of the multitude which was present. Mr Eobert Bruce required sUence, and to behave them selves quietly, for the reguard they had to the cause. WhUe they were proceeding, a cry cometh from the streets to the Kirk door, with these words : " Save yourselves, ther is a tumult in the gate." Another cry went through the streets, with these words : " Ar mour ! armour !" I heard a nobleman, a counseUour, affirme, that it was one suborned by the Cubiculars who came to the door, and after went to the streets, and raised the cry ; but who it was, it is not yet knowne. The people in the Kirk, apprehending that there was a fight among parties, leap to the streets. The greater number of burgesses, being at home in their houses, sent out to enquyr what the matter meant. They heard that their ministers were invaded, and the cry went through the streets, that their ministers were slaine ; whereupon they run to the street in annes. The barons and gentlemen who were in the Kirk accompanied Mr Eobert Bruce to his lodging, and after went to their owne, purposing to return to the kirk-yard; for they feared also the ministers invasion. The rest of the ministers went to the streets to try ; the barons and minis- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 85 ters return to the church-yard, caU for Mr Eobert Bruce, and report to him, that there was a great disorder among the people through a false alarme, and no man could perceave what was the ground of the fray. They aU lament the case, send for some of the magistrats, and desired them to pacifie the people, running some one way, and some another ; some to the Kirk, thinking their ministers were invaded or slaine ; some to the Tolbooth door, thinking the King had been slaine ; then two or three cryed at the Tolbooth door, which was shutt, for three of the Octavians, that they might take order with them ; another cryed, " The sword of the Lord and of Gideon." The King sent likewise a charge to the Provest and BaU- lies to stay the tumult. The people, at the command of the ma gistrats, went home to their owne houses, and put off their armour. La the meanwhffe, the magistrats were doing their office. The King sent down the Earle of Marr and the Lord Holyroodhouse, to the barrons and ministers conveened in the church-yard, with many fair and plausible speeches; but some hot speeches past betwixt my Lord Lindsay and the Earle of Marr. The barrons and minis ters went into the Little Kirk again, satt downe, and directed the same Commissioners, for the most part, who were directed befor, to shew his Majesty, that they were greived at their heart for the tumult, and to beseech him to provide some remedy for the present evills. The King seemed to be weU-pleased, willed them to sett downe their petitions in writ to the CounseU, and promised a rea sonable answer. Soon after, the Lairds of Cesfurd, Traquair, and CoUoneU Stewart, wer sent to them to put them in expectation that aU should go weU. Whereupon they dissolved with publict thanksgiving to God for his gracious providence, disposing such an accident after such a manner, that no man had receaved harme, and that the people retired so peaceably to their houses, at the voice of the magistrats. My Lord Forbesse, Barganie, Blairwhan, and Faudownside, were directed with thir articles ; to wit, re quests that such Octavians be removed as favoured the excommu- nicat Earles, and wer authors of aU the present troubles in the Kirk ; that the excommunicat Earles be commanded to depart out 86 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION of the countrey, befor any of their offers be heard ; that the Com missioners of the GeneraU Assembly be recaUed by pubUct pro clamation. The Commissioners when they came to the outer court of the PaUace, hearing that the King was in a rage for the dishonour done to him (as he apprehended) that day, separated themselves, and left their commission undischarged. The King went the day foUowing to Linlithgow. AU that wer not ordinarie inhabitants in Edinburgh wer commanded to depart out of the towne. The members of the Session were warned to be ready for removaU, and to sitt where they should be advertised, at the nixt proclamation. The magistrats were commanded to search and apprehend the authors of that heinous attempt. Some of the citizens wer committed to sundry wairds. The ministers of Edin burgh were commanded to enter in the castle of Edinburgh, because the King's wrath was kindled hottest against them, and the chief Octavians might use them at their pleasur. After advice with some others of the ministers, they thought it expedient to withdraw themselves tUl the present fury were mitigat. But for aU the dili gent examination which was made for many dayes, no ground could be found of any conspiracie against the King, or any other; only after the tumult was raised, one or two cryed to have some of the Octavians, abusers of the King, to take order with them, for which words they were fined. E ther had been any intention to do harm to any man, what could have hindered them to have put their pur pose in execution ? There was no partie in readiness able to with stand them. Ye see then, the Tumult upon the 17th day of December was no just cause to move the King to alter the government of our Kirk, nor to wrong the whole Kirk for the fact of one particular kirk ; howbeit their fact had been grounded upon bad intentions. Nor is it leissum to Kings to thrust Christ's government to the door for the faults of men, and bring in what formes they please. But as ther was no just occasion given, so that tumult cannot serve so much as for a pretence, seeing, as I have already discovered in the OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 87 preceeding discourse, the alteration was intended befor the 17th of December. Upon the 20th of December, Mr Patrick Galloway was sent for to come to Linhthgow, but was not suffered to come near the King. The King sent to him a coppie of the band, whereof we made men tion befor, to be subscribed, which other ministers were also to be urged to subscribe, under the pain of losse of their stipends. But he, and others after him, refused for many reasons. The Questions, whereof mention hath been made befor, came to Ught in print soon after, fifty-five in number ; and the Convention of the Estates and Ministery wer appointed to be holden at Perth, upon the 29th of February, for consulting upon and determining the spirituaU jurisdiction of the Kirk, as weU in appUcation of doc trine, as her whole poUcie ; yet in aU the Questions, the maine point of the poUcie, to wit, the superiority of bishops, was coa- ceaUed, howbeit chiefly aimed at. The Synod of Fife, holden at Cowper upon the 8th of February, ordained every Presbytrie within their bounds, to direct two of their number to meet at St Andrews, the 21st of February, to conferr and resolve with common consent upon the most sohd an swers to these questions. For strengthening of the brethren, they directed also some brethren to traveU with the King for deserting of that Convention which was to be holden at Perth, or at least for continuation tUl the ordinar Assembly, which was to be holden in Aprile ; and to shew to him that no Presbytrie hath power to give commission to any of their brethren to caU in question, or put in doubt the determinations and conclusions of the GeneraU Assem bly : as also to request his Majestie to relax the ministers of Edin burgh from the home, and restore Mr David Black to his owne place. They sett downe instructions and limitations for the Com missioners, which wer to be sent from their Presbytries to Perth, in case the dyet were keept. The Presbytrie of Edinburgh, and other Presbytries did the like. The brethren appointed by the Synod of Fife mett at St An- 88 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION drews, and resolved upon answers to the Questions. Others also took pains, and among the rest Mr Patrick GaUoway. The brethren of the ministrie repaired to Perth upon the 29th of February, but moe out of the North than wer wont to be seen at any GeneraU Assembly. Great pains were taken by courtiers and craftie poUticians to divide them in factions. They complain to the ministers be-north Tay, that the ministers of the South wer severe, undiscreet, arrogant, and usurped the government of the whole ; commended the ministers of the North for men of better disposition and greater discretion; and doubted not, if they wer acquanted with his Majestie, they should see, in short tyme, aU matters brought to a good point. Sir Patrick Murray, the diligent apostle of the North, made their acquaintance with the King. They got accesse late at night and timously in the morning. The chief of these laboured upon others that came from the North. La end, they began to look bigg on their brethren ; found fault with the minis ters of the South, speciaUy the " Popes of Edinburgh," that they had not handled matters weU, that they had almost lost the King. Yet the sincerer sort of the ministery, howbeit grieved at such speeches, stood to then: instructions, both privately and pubhctly, in such sort, that the holding of the Assembly was delayed for two or three dayes. In end, Mr James Nicolson is brought by Sir Patrick Murray to the King. After conference tiU midnight, when he was to ly downe beside Mr James Melvill, his bedfeUow, he repeated some of the King's speeches, mixed with threatnings and insinua tions. " I perceave," said he, " the King wUl wraik both himselfe and the Kirk, unlesse our matters be better looked unto, and that we yeeld so farr as we may, rather than lose aU." Mr James perceav- ing him to be farr changed, ansuered, He saw no better resolution, •than as they had done in former tymes, to seek to God by prayer, and to discharge their duty faithfully, committing the event to . God, to whom the cause belongeth. As for himself, by the grace of God, he should never yeeld to any thing contrary to the Word of God, and to that which we had sufficiently warranted by the Word, and professed so long with such comfortable fruit. " E we passe," OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 89 said he, " especiaUy at this tyme from the least point, it wiU shake us loose, disarme us of the trust we have in the equity of our cause, and break that unity whereby we have stood so strong to this hour." At length the ministers wer urged by Sir Patrick Murray, in the King's name, to resolve whether they wold hold Assembly or not. Mr Peter Blackburne, minister at Aberdeen, maintained that they might; Mr James Melvill that they could not. The brethren, for the most part, inclined to Mr James MelvUle's opi nion ; but, by the persuasive speeches used by Mr James Nicolson, and the King's authority joined withal, some were induced to assent. Commissioners from eight Presbyteries voted that meet ing could not be holden for a GeneraU Assembly. The Commis sioners from the Presbytries of Fife protested plainly that they disassented from that forme of proceeding, or whatsoever should be concluded in that pretended Assembly. Commissioners from eleven Presbyteries aUowed it for an extraordinary GeneraU As sembly. Upon this point began the renting of the ministery. Such as were sett to satisfie the King in matters to be proponed, wUl have it to be an Assembly extraordinar ; because, otherwise they could not have power to conclude or make any acts, or do any thing in prejudice of the established discipUne, or acts of for mer AssembUes. The other sort acknowledged the meeting to be lawfuU, and that they come for obedience to his Majestie, to hear what his Majesty wold propone, and answer in form, as they saw expedient, but not as having the power of a GeneraU Assembly, but rather to remitt the finaU answer to the Assembly. It was a meeting of the ministry only upon the King's missives sent to them. Others than ministers ought to be members of a Gene raU Assembly, according to the acts and practice of our Kirk. And whereas the Moderator of the last General Assembly used to begin with his exhortation and prayer, befor a new Moderator were chosen, here Mr David Lindsay, minister at Leith, a man that was gratious to the Court, by the instigation of the Court, intruded himselfe in the office of Moderator without election, 90 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION wherupon proceeded disorder and confusion. The Clerk was not chosen, and taken sworn according to the order. It is not then sufficient to prove it a GeneraU Assembly, because a number at that meeting — few moe than the disassenters — arrogated that power and authority; but the nature of the meeting must be tryed by the acts and order of the Kirk. The King's Commissioners craved the decision of thirteen arti cles only, for the present remitting the decision of a great number of the printed questions to a better opportunity. Some brethren wer appointed to conferr upon the thirteen articles, and to report their overture and advice to the Assembly. Their advice was ap proved, but after altered, through pretended haste, and otherwayes conceaved and sett downe in the Eegister. No reasoning was had in publict. So the apphcation of doctrine to the pubhct rebuke of sin was restrained. No minister shaU be chosen to any princi pali town without his Majestie's consent. Some were appointed to treat upon the rest of the questions, and to report their advice to the nixt Assembly. The tyme and place of conveening was referred to the King. Commission was given to the Presbytrie of Murray and Aberdeen, with concurrence of some brethren nominat to that effect, to insist with the Earl of Huntly, and to report his answers to the conditions and articles which wer given them in commis sion for his tryaU. The like course was taken for Angus and ErroU. These to whom the commission was given, were the men that fa voured the Earles most. Notwithstanding, they knew ther was no sincerity in their deaUing, and so the event proved. It was a great mercy of God that no mor evU was done, if we consider the carriage of matters at that meeting. Mr Eobert Bruce had with drawn himself befor out of the countrey. Mr Andrew Melvill was detained by the choosing of the Eector of the University of St Andrews, which feU forth at that tyme, and apparently was foreseen by them. Mr James MelvUle was present ; but when he perceaved the beginnings of a dangerous defection, and under standing that sundry were directed from the King to deaU with him, and to bring him to him, [he] withdrew himself secretly. Mr OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 91 Thomas Buchanan acted his part honestly, when the King sent for the ministrie to repair to the place, where he and the Estates were conveened to reason upon the articles, but feU off befor the nixt Assembly. Howbeit, the ministrie repaired to the place, where the King and Estates are conveened, at the King's desire, to conferr with them upon the articles ; yet they refused to make one As sembly with them, or to submitt any matter ecclesiasticaU, either concerning doctrine or discipUne, to their judicature, but returned to the place of their owne meeting, to reason and resolve upon aU points ; and yet ther was no reasoning in pubhck, but only among those who wer appointed to go apart and advise upon them. This Assembly, if I might so call it, and the AssembUes fol lowing, were farr different from the preceeding AssembUes. Befor, the spirituaU office-bearers appointed tyme and place of meeting ; after, they wer appointed when and wher it pleased the King. 2. Before, they wer directed by the Word ; after, by the King's letters, commissions, or speeches. 3. Before, matters wer proponed in simpUcity of heart, and brethren wer directed to seek hght out of the Word by conference, meditation, and prayer : courses after wer plotted first in the King's Cabinet ; and accordingly aU means used for execution, and impediments removed. Every man is observed, and either commended or censured : this man is the King's man, an honest man, a discreet minister, a peaceable man; he goeth this way : that man is seditious, brain sick, factious; he reasoneth in the contrar. 4. Before, matters were discussed at length pleasantly, without controlment, and the whole number ac quiesced ; now, if a man that standeth for the truth insist and cannot be stifled, with a frivolous distinguo, the King himselfe, when he is present, must faU upon him, bear him downe, and put him to sUence. 5. Before, the common aime at God's glory and the weeU of the kirk, the presence of such as were learned, zeal ous, holy, powerfuU preachers, procured good order and reverence to the Assembly ; now, the Prince's presence or purpose is only reguarded : an honest man is taunted or mocked either by gesture or speech. 6. Men of best gifts befor, had free accesse, and their 92 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION gifts wer imployed ; but now, plotts are laid, how none shaU have place but such as wiU serve to their purpose. 7. [Before,] matters wer put in dehberation, and to voting freely and indifferently; now, nothing is suffered to be agitat in pubUck, but that which the King's men are sure to carry away with plurality of voices ; and to this end the catalogue of the Commissioners' names must be viewed, that they may know who will vote with them, and who against them ; and when the roU is caUed the wonted order is not observed, but, as at this last Assembly, such are first caUed as favour their course. In a word, the advancement of Christ's kingdome was sought before ; now, the cheefe care is to frame and conforme the poUcie of the Kirk to the estate of a free Monarch, and to advance his supreme and absolute power in aU causes. We shaU have oc casion to point at more in particular afterward. Howbeit the ordinary GeneraU Assembly was to be holden in the next month of Aprile, yet the King wold not delay this meet ing at Perth in March preceeding. Upon the 27th of AprU fol lowing, Mr Eobert Pont, Moderator of the last ordinare GeneraU Assembly, and some few Commissioners out of Lothian, Strathern, Stirhngshire and Fife, repaired to St Andrews to keep the dyet ap pointed by the last GeneraU Assembly, expecting far moe brethren, but were disappointed, because of the late meeting at Perth, and an other dyet appointed by them. After incaUing upon the name of God, and humble confession of their sins, which had procured that desolation, votes and documents of protestation were taken for the hberty of the Kirk. AU summonds, references, appeUations, were continued tiU May, the tyme appointed by the meeting at Perth for the nixt Assembly. So the bitter effects of the late and yet recent rent soon appeared. The Ministers of Edinburgh, offering themselves to underly tryaU for the 17th of December, were relaxed from the home. Their innocency was tryed in the tryaU and examination of others. Mr David Black is suffered to return out of his confinement in Angus to St Andrews. This shew of calmnesse made many the more se cure, when in the mean time plotts were inlaying. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 93 The GeneraU Assembly was holden in May after, 1597, at Dun dee. After that the Assembly was lawfully fenced by the doctrine of the last Assembly's Moderator, Mr Eobert Pont, the Commis sioners from Presbytries wer wearied with attending upon Mr Bol lock's coming, whom the King and his faction intended to have Moderator. He was a godly man, but credulous and simple, not so fitt for discipUne and government as for the pulpit and the schooles ; neither was he made privie to aU the mysteries of the iniquity which was then in working, but only so farr as the plotters thought need- fuU. His old Master, Mr Thomas Buchanan, now wonne to the King's side, tuned and tutored him as he saw it fitting. They thought the estimation men had of him wold induce many to Uke of their course the better. Much traveU was taken for his election. Such ministers as were befor acquainted, brought others of any note to be acquainted with the King. This was their exercise morning and evening. After that terrors and threats were carryed to Mr Andrew MelvUTs ears, to drive him in a manner out of the toune, the King sent for him. After some rough conference betwixt them, the King dimitted him cahnely. Mr John Davidson, minister at Salt Prestoun, directed a letter to this Assembly, wherein he certified them in his owne name, and in the name of the rest of Christ's faithfuU ministers, that if any act did passe prejudiciaU to our Christian hberty, agreeable to God's Word and the lawes of this realme, that, by God's grace, he wold stand by the protestation made by himself before, ver- baUy, at the last GeneraU Assembly holden in Edinburgh. The Convention of the ministers conveened lately at Perth was acknowledged for an extraordinary GeneraU Assembly. Notes in forme of declaration of his Majesty's, and Perth Assembhe's mean ing of some of the articles then concluded, were receaved as suffi cient, notwithstanding of the opposition of many brethren. An swers wer given to so many other of the King's other Questions as wer proponed by himself or his Commissioner. Howbeit the main point, to wit, superiority of Bishops over Ministers, was conceaUed, yet, in the answers, it was ordained, that ordination of 94 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION ministers be not acted without imposition of hands, which befor was not thought necessary; because the imposition of hands is now, by the Prelates, accounted the cheef note or mark to difference a bishop from a presbyter, which he may not delegat to a presby ter, as he may do jurisdiction. It appeareth they have been pre paring the way by this ordinance. These to whom the tryaU of the excommunicat Earles was committed, produced their answers to the articles and conditions prescribed to them. Power was given to the same Commissioners, after the accomphshment of the con ditions, to absolve them from the sentence of excommunication, who wer as ready to absolve as the other in shew wer to be absolved ; and that was only in shew, that they might the more easily be re stored to their estates and dignities, as their continuance in Poperie afterward made manifest. THE CHEEFE WORKMEN FOR EPISC0PACD3 ENABLED WITH A GENERALL COMMISSION FOR THE BETTER EFFECTUATING OF THEIR PURPOSE. Power and commission was given, at this Assembly, to fourteen ministers, or to any seven of them, to conveen with the King, at such tyme and place as he should appoint, to take sohd order anent the provision of ministers to Edinburgh, Dundee, St An drews, the King's owne House, and the Prince's ; to give their advice and judgment to his Majestie, anent the planting of every particular kirk within the realme ; to devise overtures concerning the Constant Platt ; and, generaUy, to give their advice to his Ma jestie concerning the weU of the Kirk, and entertainment of peace and obedience to his Majesty ; and to propone to his Majesty the petitions and greeves, as weU of the Kirk in generaU, as of every member thereof in particular. Commissioners wer appointed be for, to present articles, petitions or greevances to the Parhament, King or CounseU ; but now, those who were appointed by this Assembly, have also commission to sitt with the King and exerce jurisdiction, by censuring such ministers as by free apphcation of OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 95 their doctrine offended the King. It was easy to the King's faction to induce a great number [to agree to] this GeneraU Commission ; because befor, they wer forced to attend long upon such as wer ap pointed to modifie stipends, but now they are put in hope of large and constant provisions. This pohcie hath served their turn ever since, to put them in hope -of augmentation of stipends, when the King was to urge any point upon the Assembly. These Commis sioners, having accesse to the King when they pleased, and commis sion to sitt and consult with him, began soon to change their man ners. They wold rule, both in and out of the Assembhes. Matters which were to be treated in GeneraU AssembUes were first prepared and drest by them at Court. Some were put in the roU for the fashion, who wer not made privie to the secret plotts, but only to grace the company ; for seven wer sufficient at this tyme to sitt and plot what they pleased. So these Commissioners wer a wedge taken out of the Kirk, to rent her with her own forces ; and this GeneraU Commission was the very needle which drew in Episco- paUe authority. In the moneth of June immediately foUowing, the King and Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly conveening at Falkland, reduced the sentence of deposition pronounced by the Presbytery of St Andrews against Mr John Eutherford, minister at Kinnocher, a non-resident, one that waited not upon his calling, but took him to the exercise of physick. In the moneth of July they removed Mr David Black, and Mr Eobert WaUace, two painfull ministers out of St Andrews, without consent or advice of the Presbytrie. Mr Eobert WaUace was suspended for some words uttered against my Lord Menmuire, (Mr John Lindsay,) Secretar, a plotter against the Kirk. Mr George Gladstanes, minister in Angus, was placed by him in Mr David's roome. Mr George was afterward preferred to the Bishoprick of the See ; whereby it appeareth that these other two were removed to give way to the planting of a bishop there ; howbeit it was strangely dissembled, in the meantime. At the same- tyme, they procured a new choise of a Eector of the University ; Mr Andrew MelviU being rector. In the meantime, an act was 96 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION made that no Masters nor Professors of Divinity in the University should sit in the Presbytrie upon matters of discipUne ; which was done of purpose to seclude Mr Andrew. In the month of August, the three Popish Earles were relaxed, by sound of trumpet, at the cross of Edinburgh, and proclamed free subjects. Their restoration to their Uvings, dignities and honours, was proclamed at the crosse, in tyme of the Parhament, which was holden in December foUowing. THE FIRST STEP TO OUR PRELATS' GRANDEUR : MINISTERS VOTE LN PARLIAMENT. At this Parhament, which was holden in December 1597, the workmen for Episcopacie — the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly — preferred a petition in name of the Kirk, to wit, That ministers might have vote in Parhament. They had not commission to petition any such thing, either for the Kirk in generaU, or for the ministrie in particular. It is true, it was an old complaint and greevance of the GeneraU AssembUes, that those who had the benefices of the prelacies voted in Parhament in name of the Kirk, and therefor petitioned that none vote in Parliament in name of the Kirk, but such as should have commission from the Kirk, if ther wer such a necessity that some must vote in name of the Kirk ; but that ministers in particular vote in Parhament in name of the Kirk, was never petitioned. The Assembly holden in October 1581, being required by the King to give him some overture, how he shaU not be prejudged, seeing they had damned the office of bishops, whereunto also is annexed a temporaU jurisdiction, by whom the Prince was served by voting in Parhament, assisting in CounseU, contributing to taxations and such like ; thirtie barrons, burgesses, commissioners from burghs, and ministers wer appointed by the Assembly to consult upon it apart. They returned, after consultation, to the Assembly, with this overture, That for voting in Parhament, or assisting in CounseU, Commissioners from the Ge neraU Assembly shaU supply the place of Bishops ; as for the exerce- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 97 ing of civill or criminaU jurisdiction, the head baUlies may exerce the same. The Assembly aUowed the overture, but did not deter mine that ministers should be sent Commissioners to that effect. When the like question was proponed by the Convention of Estates, in October 1582, answer was returned from the Assem bly, That they could not consent that any should vote, but such as did bear office in the Kirk, and wer authorized with commission from the Kirk; but did not determine whether ministers, or barrons and burgesses who were elders. The Assembly, holden in May 1592, enjoined every brother to consider, Whether it was leissum to ministers to vote in Parliament, in the old Prelates places, that they might be the more able to reason upon it : but no conclusion was resolved upon. So the Assembly was never earnest for vote in Parhament, but complained that such Lords as had the abbacies, priories and bishopricks, voted in name of the Kirk, whereby the Kirk was damnified in sufficient maintainance for the service of God ; or answered to the King's complaining of the want of his Third Estate. But the ground is false, that, of necessity, the Kirk must be an Estate in Parhament ; for by the Kirk is meant either the mi nistrie only, according to the Popish sense, taking the clergie only for the Kirk ; or the ministrie, togither with the communalitie of professors, which is the right acceptation of the word. Mi nisters may not lawfuUy sit as members in ParUament, because the Parhament is a CiviU court or great counseU, conveened for making of laws concerning weights and measures, rights of inhe ritance, forfaultures, losse of Umb or hfe, and such like, whereof ministers ought not to make lawes or be judges, seeing they are separat and set apart to preach the GospeU, and watch over the souls of the people. And howbeit church affairs and matters of rehgion be sometimes treated in ParUament, yet it is a civiU as sembly : their proceeding and sanction of such lawes is civill. E ye wUl comprehend aU the professors or members of the Kirk under the name of the Kirk, then aU the subjects of this king dom shaU make but a Third Estate, — the whole countrey but a G 98 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION pairt of the ParUament. Farther, the subjects considered ma- teriaUy, they are the same persons both in Kirk and Common wealth; but considered with diverse respects, they are distin guished fbrmaUy. As citizens of the kingdom, their body is re presented in Parhament. As members of the Kirk, their body is represented in a GeneraU Assembly. As members of the Kirk, they should meddle only with things spirituaU in their judicatories, counseUs, &c. The truth is, that none doth vote in Parhament in the name of the Kirk, or as ecclesiasticaU persons, but only as bar rons, or in respect of the baronie annexed to the bishoprick, abbacie, or priory. So that, if prelats were not barrons, the Kirk wold get no vote. I grant ministers may be present at Parhaments with the Book of God in their hands, if they be requyred to an swer any doubt ; nor ought the Estates to make any act concerning rehgion, or the affairs of the Kirk, without the advice and consent of her representative body, the NationaU Assembly ; but ministers ought not to be members of that court or counseU, nor no other in name of the Kirk. So many noblemen as possessed great benefices, and so many others as they could move to assist them, opposed ; but, through the King's earnest dealling with sundry, it was granted, that so many of the ministrie as his Majesty should provide to the office, place, title, and dignity of a bishop, abbot, or other prelate, shall, at aU tymes hereafter, have vote in ParUament. It was thought that no honest man in the ministery wold accept of such dignities, titles and offices ; and that therefor the Estates wer more hberall in their grant. The consideration of the office was remitted to the consultation and agreement of the King and the GeneraU Assembly, but without prejudice of the jurisdiction and discipline of the Kirk ; but what that office of the bishop, abbot, prior, should be, and not prejudiciaU to the jurisdiction and discipline of the Kirk, I think it wer hard to determine. The Commissioners, as if they had procured a great benefit to the Kirk, sent their missives to the Presbytries to informe them with what difficulty it was obtained, and what danger, ther was in OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 99 delay, and therfor had anticipat the tyme of the Assembly, which was to be holden in May ; and, with his Majestie's consent, had appointed it to be holden the 7th of March. Under fair pretences the dyets appointed by ordinar GeneraU Assemblyes wer altered, and either anticipat to surprise men, or prorogat tiU they had pre pared persones, or dressed purposes, tUl at last the whole hberty to appoint any dyet at aU was reft out of their hands. In their missives they informe them likewise, what order was taken for the platt and provision of stipends, to make the other point the more acceptable. Yet the judicious and sincerer sort of the ministrie discovered the mystery of iniquity, lurking in this pretended benefit of ministers voting in ParUament ; as the Synods holden in Lothian and Fife, about the end of February. Ei the Synod of Fife, David Fergusson, the most ancient minister in Scotland, discoursed anent the travel and pains taken by the ministry to purge this Kirk of the corrupt Estate of Bishops. " But now," said he, " I perceave a purpose to erect it again. I can compare the convoy to nothing more fitly than to that which the Grecians used for the overthrow of the towne of Troy, by busking up a brave horse, and by a crafty Sinon perswading them to demohsh a part of their waUs with their owne hands, to receave that in for their honor and weU- fare, which served for their utter wraik and destruction." There fore, he wold, with the other two brethren who had already given warning, cry, Equo ne credite, Teucri ! Mr John Davidson being present upon occasion, said, " Busk, busk, busk him as bonnUy as ye can, and bring him in as fairly as ye wUl ; we see him weiU eneuch : see how he setteth up the horns of his mytre." Sir Patrick Murray had been directed to the Synod from the King, and a letter was [sent] from the Commissioners of the GeneraU As sembly, to perswade them to accept so great a benefit, procured with so great difficulty. The greatest number were inclining, tiU Mr Andrew Melvill, and Mr James MelviU, began to forewarn them of the danger. Upon Saturday the 25th of February fell forth that fearfuU g2 100 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION ecclipse of the sun, which continued the space of two hours, so fearfuU, that that Saturday is yet caUed by the people, " The black Saturday :" a prognostick, as the tymes gave occasion to inter pret, of that darknesse which was to faU upon the Kirk. The GeneraU Assembly, conveened in Dundee the 7th of March 1597, alias 1598. Mr Patrick Blackburne, minister at Aberdeen, was chosen Moderator by plurahty of votes, especiaUy of the bar rons and northland ministers. His assessors wer nominat by the King, against aU order. Nothing of moment was done the first two dayes, but ministers were brought to the King from morning tiU late at night, and voters procured to vote in ParUament, and other matters which were to be proponed. Mr Andrew Melvill was commanded first to keep his lodging ; and after, upon the 9th day, he and Mr John Johnstoun, a Professor of Divinity in St Andrews, were charged to depart out of the towne under the pain of horning. Some Presbytries gave in their greevances against the Commis sioners of the GeneraU Assembly. Such alterations were not heard at any time before in our Assembhes, as now about these greevances. Papists and pohticians wer brought in to take their pastyme, and gather matter of slander and calumnie. But the King, fearing that the maine purpose which he had in hand could not succeed that way, laboured to have the greevances buryed, and, to please the ministry, promised to traveU with the taksmen of the tithes for augmentation of the duty of their tacks. Whereupon, the Commissioners from the Presbytries which had given in their greevances being removed, and secluded from voting in the tryaU of the Commissioners, it was concluded, that the greivances and answers of the Commissioners should be buryed and obhterat for continueing of peace in the Kirk ; and the proceedings of the Com missioners of the GeneraU Assembly wer approved and passed over without censure, both what they had done in placeing and displaceing ministers at St Andrews, reponeing Mr John Euther- foord, and also obtruding two young men, Mr George Eobertson OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 101 and Mr Peter Hewat, upon Edinburgh, to be coUeagues to the old ministers, at the division of the towne in quarters.* The General Commission was renewed and made more ample. FuU power was given to some ministers, about twenty in number, or to any nyne of them, to concur with his Majesty for setting downe sohd grounds for the constant Platt, and of security to be made to the tacksmen for the remanent of their tithes ; and, in case the Presbyteries approve their grounds, to conveen with his Majesty and Lords of his Privie CounseU, having the power of the Parha ment to that effect, that they may put a final end to the constant Platt and planting of every particular kirk within this realm ; as also to plant sufficient ministers in the principaU burrows, and to provide sufficient ministers to the King and Prince his house, the kirks of Dumfries and New Abbey ; to present greevances to the Parhament ; to give his Majesty advice how to avoid dangers and inconveniences, which wer likely to befaU the Kirk ; and, in case his Majesty found himself greeved, or crave redresse of any enor mity done to him by any of the ministerie, to cognosce thereupon, and, after advice of the most discreet of the Presbytrie, to proceed in tryaU be themselves, and conclude as they shaU see expedient for the glory of God, and the peace of the Kirk ; and last, to pro pone to his Majesty, at their conventions, petitions and, greevances, either of this Assembly in generall, or of any member in particu lar. This Commission was to endure to the nixt Assembly. The most part of the persons nominat wer such as were aspiring, or were preferred to bishopricks afterwards, viz., Messrs Peter Black burn, James Nicolson, Alexander Douglasse, Thomas Buchanan, George Gladstones, Alexander Lindsay, Eobert Pont, David Lindsay, Gavin HamUton, Andrew Knox ; Mr John Knox, Mr Henry Livingstoun, and some others, wer nominat for the fashion. Nine might be had at aU tymes without them, to consult and conclude when they thought it expedient. Commission was given * In 1584, the town of Edinburgh had been divided into four districts or parishes, with a minister for each ; and in 1597, the Town-Council resolved to increase the number of ministers to eight, or two for each parish. 102 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION in particular to Mess^ Eobert EoUock, David Lindsay, Eobert Pont, Patrick GaUoway, Thomas Buchanan, James Nicolson, George Gladstones, John Duncanson, or any five of them, to place the ministers of Edinburgh in their severall quarters. A whole week was spent befor the cheef point was proponed, to weary the ministers come from the South ; that, after the departure of some of them, detaining their owne adherents, they might the more easUy come to their purpose. The King, in the tenth session, declared, what great care he had to adorne and benefit the Kirk, and to restore to her her patrimony ; [and] that for the effectua ting of this, it was needfuU that ministers have vote in Parhament, without which the Kirk could not be vindicat from poverty and contempt. " I mind not," said the King, " to bring PapisticaU or AngUcan Bishops, but only to have the best and wisest of the mi nistery appointed by the GeneraU Assembly, to have place in CounseU and ParUament, to sit upon their own matters, and not to stand always at the door like poor supplicants, despised, and nothing reguarded." Some of the Commissioners spoke to the same effect. Ther was sharp and hot reasoning, notwithstanding, in the eleventh session, against ministers, voters in Parliament. Messrs Eobert Bruce, James MelviU, John CarmichaeU, John Da vidson, William Aird, and some others, oppugned. The King was forced to commend Mr John CarmichaeU for his acutenesse. Mr James Melvill's reasons are extant in the Course of Conformitie, * as they were enlarged afterward by himself. Mr Andrew MelviU was charged to depart out of the towne the week before, because they feared him, as was weeU remembered by Mr John Knox, when this point was proponed. But what availled reasoning, where authority swayed the matter, and votes wer procured befor hand ? Beside, the point itselfe was so plausible to corrupt and worldly mi nisters, that they thought it the only mean to recover the Kirk rents, when some of their owne number shaU sit in CounseU and * The title of a tract usually ascribed to David Caldenvoood, printed in the year 1622, 4to. Melville's Reasons are also included in his own Diary, ("Wodrow Society edit., pp. 470-485.) OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 103 Parhament ; whereas befor they wont to stand at the door with their petitions in paper, and scarce gett a good answer. Some were so simple that they could not see evUl in the vote, nor foresee the consequence of it. When the roU was caUed, Mr GUbert Bodie, a drunken Orkney asse, was first caUed on ; a number of northland ministers foUowed, aU for the beUy and the body ; yet the negative voters were overcome only by ten voices, and had overcome the affirmative, if barrons wanting commission had not voted with them. The Commissioners, chaUenged by sundry brethren for presenting such an article to the Estates, were ap proved ; and it was concluded, That it was necessary and expedient, the ministrie, as the Third Estate of this realm, in name of the Kirk, have vote in ParUament. But here it may be demanded, If the ministrie, as representing the Kirk within this realme, should have vote in Parhament, wherefore doth not the whole ministrie vote in Parhament ? But it is false that the ministrie only repre- senteth the Kirk without other office-bearers. The Act of Par liament beareth no such meaning, That the ministrie represents the Kirk, and therfor should have vote. And at the same As sembly some that consented that the Kirk should have vote in Par hament, wold have had barrons and burgesses chosen by the As sembly to be their Commissioners to vote. Others were content to accept it upon whatsoever conditions it might be had. Mr John Davidson, when his vote was asked, desired them not to be sudden in such weighty matters. When one had said, that the title of Lord could not be denyed to them that were to sit in Parhament, and mantainance answerable to their dignity — " See ye not, brethren," said Mr John Davidson, " how bonnUy yonder bishop beginneth to creep out, Novus palliatus Episcopus." The King and a great number burst forth in laughter, so hght account made they of the matter ; but he, proceeding, said, " Have we not done much to it, that have striven so long against that corrupt es tate to bring forth now such a birth ?" The deceitfuU workmen laboured to extenuat the matter, and to cover their proceedings as if no such thing had been intended. La end, he gave in a protes- 104 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION tation in writ, which he had in readinesse three or four dayes be for, in his owne name, and in name of aU other brethren who wold adhere to it, and craved that it might be insert in the books of the Assembly. He votted and reasoned befor in other matters, but without prejudice of his protestation made befor, or to be made after. This protestation was reached from hand to hand tiU it was laid down befor the Clerk. The King taketh it up, readeth it, and sheweth it to the Moderator, and others sitting beside, and then put it up in his pocket. La this protestation he protested, in his own name, and in the name of others, that he disassented from aU the proceedings in this and the other two Assemblies immedi ately preceeding, as not having the hberty of free Assembhes per mitted unto them, tUl the nixt better constituted and advised As sembly ; and, therefor, that it be lawfull for him and others who shaU adhere to this protestation, to use their wonted freedome, notwithstanding of any law or act to be made in the contrare. He left the Assembly ; and a number of ministers, who were sUent when the King demanded in a boasting manner who would stand to it, overtaking him at the. other side of the ferry, subscribed it, about three or four score. But when he comes to St Andrews, he was advised to cutt off the names and burne them. In the twelfth session, Concerning the number of the ministery that should have vote in Parhament in name of the Kirk, it was likewise concluded, and thought expedient, That as many of them should be chosen for vote in ParUament as wer wont of old in tyme of the PapisticaU Kirk to be bishops, abbots and priors, who had the like liberty, viz., to the number of fifty-one, or there by. Item, after reasoning, it was voted and concluded, That the election of such of the ministery as should have vote in Parhament ought to be of a mixed quality, and appertain partly to his Ma jesty, and partly to the Kirk. And because, for shortnesse of tyme, the brethren could not be perfectly resolved in the remanent heads and circumstances, concerning the office of him who should have vote in Parliament, viz., de modo eligendi ; of his rent ; of the continuance of his office ; whether he should be chosen ad culpam, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 105 or not ; of his name ; of the cautions to preserve him from corrup tions, and such other circumstances : The Assembly desireth every Presbytrie to be ripely and thoroughly advised with the heads above written, and, thereafter, to conveen in their SynodaU As sembUes, through the whole countrey, upon one day, which shaU be done upon the first Tuesday of June nixt to come ; and there, after new reasoning and advising upon the heads above written, that every Synod choose three of the wisest of their number, who shaU be ready upon his Majestie's advertisement (which shaU be upon a month's warning at least) to conveen with his Majesty, to gither with the doctors of the Universities, viz., Messrs Andrew Melvill, John Johnstoun, Eobert EoUock, Patrick Sharp, Eobert Howie, Eobert Wilkie, James Martein, such a day and place as his Majesty shaU think expedient, with power to them to treat, reason and conferr, upon the said heads, and others appertaining thereunto ; and, in caise of aggreement and uniformity of opinions, to vote and conclude the whole question touching vote in ParUa ment ; otherwise, in case of discrepance and variance, to referr the conclusion thereof to the nixt GeneraU Assembly. It standeth not with equity that the King should be partner in the election of the Commissioners to vote in name of the Kirk, more than of the Commissioners for barrons and burgesses. The King and the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly had framed some cautions to inclose the Commissioner, (voter in ParUament,) to range him in, suppose he should grow never so wyld, that he grow not to a Popish or Inglish Bishop, [and] that he might the more easUy be embraced. But, when they were read, they perceaved that many brethren who had assented to the maine point begann to scarr ; therfor this point was referred with the rest, to be advised upon. Mr Andrew MelviU and Mr John Johnstoun were debarred from this Assembly, where the main points were to be reasoned and put to voting, but wer permitted to be present at the appointed meet ing of the Commissioners from Synods, wher no power was granted to conclude but in case of agreement ; and that their rea- 106 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION sons might be known befor the nixt Assembly, and there shifted or suppressed. The Synods were enjoined to conveen aU in one day, that one should not understand what another had done or receave hght from another. Because they perceaved that ther came a number of Commis sioners out of some Presbytries to oppose to their course, they pro cured then an act, that, in tyme coming, no moe ministers be directed as Commissioners to the GeneraU AssembUe but three at the most ; that one be directed from every Presbytrie, in name of the barrons, and one Commissioner be directed out of every burgh, except Edinburgh, which shaU have power to direct two ; yet they themselves afterwards brought five or six out of some Presbytries, as they found needfuU, to advance their course. Those who had the charge committed to them to place the ministers of Edinburgh in their severaU quarters, who befor had taught promiscuously, wrought great vexation to Mr Eobert Bruce, in AprUe and May foUowing 1598. He had been minister in Edinburgh eleven years befor. Now, when he was to accept a part of the towne, togither with his coUeague, Mr James Balfour, which was his owne desire, they urge him with imposition of hands. Lest he should seeme to run unsent aU the years bypast, without a calling, he constantly refused to receave imposition of hands as a ceremony of ordination, or entering into the ministry ; but was content to receave it as a signe of confirmation, if they would give their declaration thereupon in write, which, after much debate, they were forced at last to give, maugre their hearts. I observed befor, that this ceremony, which was thought unneces sary and indifferent, was now of late urged as necessary ; because they were laying the foundation of Episcopacie, which, in words and outward profession, they denyed. Mr William MelviU, one of the Senators of the CoUedge of Jus tice, and Sir Patrick Murray, were directed by the King to the Synod of Fife, which was holden in June. They were carefull to . procure three to be chosen for the appointed conference that fa- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 107 voured the King's course ; but by the devise of their favourers, a number of the best affected and most opposite to the course wer put upon the leets, that they may be ridd of tlieir votes, and that the votes of such as were affected that way might be scattered, whereas the votes of others who wer wrought upon, were laid upon thrie of their owne. So Messrs Thomas Buchanan, George Glad stones, and John FairfouU, were chosen Commissioners ; which, when the sincerer sort which was the far greatest part, perceaved, they wold yeeld to no other commission, but to report faithfully the judgment of the Synod, to reason, vote and conclude, according to the same. The Commissioners from Synods conveen in Falkland, the 25th of July 1598. The King and his adherents found not such ad vancement of their course as they expected. Seeing the sincerer sort could not get the maine point recaUed, they laboured for the straiter Cautions. It was concluded as foUoweth : — " First, Concerning the manner of chosing of him that shall have vote in ParUament, in name of the Kirk, it is condescended upon, that he shaU first be recommended by the Kirk to his Majesty ; and that the Kirk shaU nominat six for every place that hath need to be filled, out of which number his Majesty shaU choose one whom he Uketh best ; and his Majesty promiseth, obligeth and bindeth himselfe, that he shaU choose no other but one of that number; and in caise his Majesty refuse the whole, upon a just reason of unsufficiencie, and of greater sufficiencie of others not recommended, the Kirk shaU make a new recommendation of men, according to the first number, out of which one shaU be chosen by his Majesty without any further refusaU or new nomination ; and he that shaU be chosen by his Majesty shaU be admitted by the Synods. Secondly, It is concluded, that the GeneraU Assembly shaU have the nomination or recommendation of him that shall have vote in Parhament in name of the Kirk, who shaU take the advise of the Synods and Presbytries thereanent directed from them in write ; and the Synod shaU have hberty to nominat, as weeU within their 108 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION province, as without ; providing, that if there be any within the province meet for the place, cceteris paribus, he be preferred to an other. Thirdly, Anent his rent, it is advised, with one consent, that the kirks being planted sufficiently, the coUedges and schooUs already erected not prejudged, the King's Majesty shah provide to him aU the rest of that benefice whereunto he is preferred. Fourthly, As for the Cautions, to keep him that shah have vote in Parhament from corruption, they are these foUowing : — 1. That he presume not any tyme to propone at Parhament, CounseU, or Convention, in name of the Kirk, any thing without expresse warrand and direction from the Kirk ; and such things as he shaU answer for to be for the weUl of the Kirk, under the pain of deposition from his office : neither shaU he keep sUence, or con sent, in any of the saids Conventions, to any thing that may be pre- judicaU to the hberty and weU of the Kirk, under the same pain. 2. He shaU be bound, at every GeneraU Assembly, to give an accompt anent the discharging of his commission since the As sembly preceeding, and shaU submitt himselfe to their censure, and stand to their determination whatsoever, without appeUation, and shall seek and obtain ratification of his doings at the said As sembly, under the pain of infamie and excommunication. 3. He shaU content himselfe with that part of the benefice which shaU be given him by his Majesty for his Uving, not hurting nor prejudging the rest of the ministers of the Kirk within his benefice, planted or to be planted, or any other minister in the countrey whatsomever ; and this clause to be insert in the pro vision. 4. He shaU not, in any wise, dffapidat his benefice, neither sett nor make any disposition thereof without the speciaU advice and consent of his Majesty and the GeneraU Assembly ; and, for the greater warrand, he shaU interdyte himself not to dffapidate his benefice, nor to consent to the dilapidation thereof, made by others to the Generall Assembly ; and shaU be content that inhibi tions be raised against or upon him to that effect. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 109 5. He shaU be bound to attend faithfully upon his own particu lar congregation, wher he shaU be minister, in aU the points of a pastor ; and hereanent shaU be subject to the tryaU and censure of his owne Presbytery and ProvinciaU Assembly, as any other minis ter that beareth not commission. 6. In the administration of discipUne, coUation of benefices, and aU other points of ecclesiasticaU government, he shaU neither usurp nor acclaime to himself any power or jurisdiction farther than any of the rest of his brethren, under the pain of deprivation ; and in caise he usurp any part of the ecclesiasticaU government, and the Presbytrie, Synod, or GeneraU Assembly oppone and make any impediment, to be null, ipso facto, without any declaration. 7. Ei Presbytries, ProvinciaU and GeneraU AssembUes, he shaU behave himself in aU things, and be subject to their censure as any of the brethren of the Presbytrie. 8. At his admission to the office of Commissionarie, these and aU other points necessary, he shaU swear and subscribe to fulfiU, under the penalties forsaid ; otherwise not to be admitted. 9. La case he be deposed by the GeneraU Assembly, Synod, or Presbytry, from his office of the ministery, he shaU lose his vote in Parhament ipso facto, and his benefice shaU vaick.* Farther Cautions to be made, as the Kirk pleaseth and findeth occasion. Touching his name that for the Kirk shaU have vote in ParUa ment, It is advised, by uniforme consent of the whole brethren, that he shaU be caUed ' The Commissioner ' of such a place ; and in case the Parhament, by bis Majestye's moyen, may be induced to acknow ledge that name, it shaU stand so ; if not the GeneraU Assembly shaU conclude this question anent his name. The question being demanded, Whether the commission of him that should vote in ParUament for the Kirk, should endure for his Ufetyme, except some cryme interveen, or for a shorter tyme, at the pleasure of the Kirk ? the Commissioners of the ProvinciaU * i. e. become vacant. 110 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Assemblies, being of diverse opinions, thought good to referr this question to the nixt GeneraU Assembly." The King and Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly were no't weUl pleased with the strictnesse of these Cautions, nor mind ed that they should be observed ; but wer content that ministers vote in Parhament was admitted, upon whatsoever conditions. That they might have tyme to dresse their matters for the nixt Assembly, which was appointed to be holden at Aberdeen in July 1599, it was prorogat, by proclamation, tUl March 1600; as also that the King may, by degrees, bereave the AssembUes of their hberty to appoint and indict dyets. In the month of July 1599, the King and the Commissioners, having caUed for some ministers to St Andrews, laboured with them for reconciliation and profession of brotherly love, which was not refused. But by this mean, they thought to insinuat themselves in their affections, and either to win them to their course, or to blunt the edge of their zeaU against them ; for it was not difference in opinion only that made ahenation of affections, but plotting against the discipUne, aspiring to preferrment, vexing of their brethren. In September foUowing, was the letter directed to the Pope, for which Secretar Elphingstoun was afterward troubled. In the same moneth certain passages, extracted by Mr James MelvUl out of Basilicon Doron, wer presented to the brethren of the Synod of Fife, wherein the King's intention to erect the state of Bishops was discovered, howbeit it was denyed. Some few coppies only were printed at first,* and these were committed to the trust of some few. Mr John Dicks [Dykes] was suspected to have extracted these passages. The King thereupon sent Mr Frances BothweU to apprehend him, that he might reveaU from whom he had the coppy, but he withdrew himselfe, for Mr James his security. The King, with advice of the Commissioners of the GeneraU * The edition referred to was printed at Edinburgh, by Robert -Waldegrave, 1599, 4to. According to the Royal Author's own statement in 1603, there were only seven copies printed of the original edition. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. Ill Assembly, fearing the hke opposition at the nixt Assemblie that he found at the last, or greater, thought meet to appoint a conference at Holyroodhouse the 17th of November, to the end, as was pre tended, that such as were not satisfied might be resolved, that so a way might be prepared for a peaceable Assembly. The truth is, if he could obtain the unanimous consent of those who were con veened, who were the men of cheef note in our Kirk, he assured himself their judgment would be foUowed in the nixt Assembly ; if not, yet the reasons of the other party might be made known, an swers or replyes prepared, or some other means used to attain to their purpose. It was granted to every one that was present, to reason freely, both upon the points already concluded, and the points which wer referred to the nixt Assembly. The brethren opposite to their course, howbeit not prepared, because not timously forewarned, condescended to reason, but under protestation, that their reasons wer not prejudiciaU to the nixt Assembly, and that it might be free to them to add, farther then, as they were able. They reasoned pitluly against ministers voting in ParUament, against the perpetuity of the votter, and the title of Lord or Bishop to be given to him. Farther, they foretold, that which we see and feeU this day, that they wold debauch and be distracted from their caU- ings ; that they wold break the barrs of aU the Caveats, vote and reason in ParUament as they pleased, and take no limited commis sion ; if they got once the title of Bishops, aU the Caveats wold not restrain them from usurping lordship and preheminence over tlieir brethren ; that they wUl bring with them from the Court to the Kirk such behaviour and manners as they drink in there ; they wUl look sour if they want the styles among their brethren, which are given them in the Court, wher they shaU be styled " Lords" at every word, and, possessing the chiefe places in the realme, wUl be avenged on them at the Platt or the Court ; or otherways, if they serve the Prince and the Estate, howbeit against the weale of the Kirk, the Prince wUl maintain them by his authority and moyen in AssembUes, having the sustentation of ministers in his power ; or if the Assembly depose them, he wiU have them to enjoy still 112 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION their styles and rents, and so shaU they sett themselves to be avenged upon the Kirk. They dissolved with Uttle contentment to the King. " If the Assembly wold not embrace the benefit offered, let them," said he, " blame themselves if they fall in po verty and contempt." As for himself, he could not want one of his Estates ; he wold place such in these places as he thought good, who wold accept of the same and do their duty to him and the countrey. This bastard Estate is commonly aUedged, and the service they owe to the King and countrey ; whereas their ser vice is to serve in matters spirituaU for the welfare of men's souls, both Erince and people, in the countrey ; and others may and can serve better in things civill or temporaU. Mr Peter Blackburne, minister at Aberdeen, Moderator of the last General Assembly, taught good and sound doctrine in his ex hortation at the beginning of last Assembly, which was holden at Montrose in March 1600, but was induced or rather threatened to recant, afternoon, before the whole Assembly. This was a step to a bishop of the new stamp. Sundry of the sincerer sort wer put on the leets, and therfor the votes wer divided ; but aU that were for the King's course laid their votes upon one man, and so Mr Eobert Wilkie was chosen Moderator. The hke trick I observed befor in a Synod of Fife. The nixt poUcie was to draw their chief opposits upon the privy conference, that they might know how to deaU in pubUck. La the privy conference, four were chosen for each side to conferr and reason apart, upon hope that, upon their agreement, wold foUow an universaU harmony as was pretended ; but in effect, it was to essay if their opposits might be drawn to them, if not, to proceed after their wonted manner. Yet some good was expected, if their con ference had not been interrupted by the King. For the one side, wer chosen Messrs George Gladstaines, James Nicolson, Eobert Howie, Alexander Douglas ; and Mr John Spottiswood, now Bishop of St Andrews, to be their scribe : Messrs Patrick Sharp, Patrick Simpson, James MelviU, David Barclay, for the other side; and one to be their scribe ; for they were enjoined to sett down OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 113 their reasons in writ. They spent the tyme very fruitfuUy an whole afternoon, beginning at the very ground to define a Parlia ment, and what it was to vote in Parhament, and so forth. The four of the opposite side were square and plain, after protestation [before God] for secrecie ; but the King, being informed that night by some of his owne, wold suffer no more that private reasoning the day foUowing, but wold have it publict befor himself and some of the CounseU, in the privy conference. Those that stood for the estabhshed discipUne, proved by many Eeasons that the act of the GeneraU Assembly holden at Dundee 1598, taken according to the mynd of the Act of ParUament, concerning Ministers vote in Par Uament, was flatt repugnant to the Word of God. Their reasons were so strong, that in effect they were aU granted ; but only it was denyed that any such thing wold foUow as was aUedged. They denyed they were to bear any charge or office in things civil, make laws, judge upon forfaultries, medle with civU affairs, con found jurisdictions, &c. It was pertinently aUedged, how the col- Uer desired to dweU beside the waker, * aUedging many commo dities might redound to them both by their feUowship ; but the waker refused altogether, " for it is not possible," said he, " but thy occupation wUl marr mine, for thou makest black, and I make white." The King and Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly, — I mean so many as wer privy to the course, were aspyring to bishopricks, and had their meetings with the King for such purposes, — finding this conference not to succeed, held the gripp they had gotten. The acts already past must not come in question in pubhck. Their chief care was to obtain a ratification of the Cautions concluded at Falk land, and consent to the perpetuity of the voter in ParUament. The King, from his rising in the morning tUl he went late to bed, was so bussied with ministers, that the courtiers complained they could not get accesse to him. Mr Andrew MelvUl was commanded to keep his lodging, howbeit he was sent in commission from his * Or, wauker, a fuller, from wauk, to full cloth. H 114 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Presbytery. The brethren were made to beleeve, that erecting of Episcopacy was not intended, but only ministers voting in Parha ment to vindicat the Kirk from contempt and poverty ; and so sounded their answer to their opposits arguments in the conference. Yet there was such opposition made, that the King and the Com missioners of the GeneraU Assembly could not procure perpetuity to the Commissioner in ParUament ad vitam, or ad culpam, &c. Fiftie-one voted that he should be chosen annuatim by every Pres bytrie from year to year ; some cryed, instead of annuatim, " Away with him ;" forty-eight, of which many were not ministers, voted ad vitam or ad defectum. The King's workmen were so greeved, that they conveened and devised a new glosse drawing near to that which was concluded ; to wit, that the Commissioner voter in Parhament, shall give account annuatim, and lay downe his office at the feet of the Assembly, to be continued or altered as the Assembly shaU think expedient. They communicate this device to the King. The King and Clerk sett the conclusion downe so. And so it is extant as foUoweth : — " Which whole conclusions, (to wit, of the meeting of the Com missioners from Synods at Falkland,) being read in audience of the whole Assembly, the Assembly, being ryply advised therewith, rati fied, aUowed, and approved the same, and thought expedient that the said Cautions, together with such others as shaU be agreed up on by the Assembly, be insert in the body of the Act of Parha ment, which is to be made for conformation of the voter in Parha ment to the Kirk, as most necessary, and substantiaU points of the same. " Forasmuch as the Commissioners of Synods conveened at Falk land, the 25th of July 1598, being of diverse opinions concerning the continuance of his commission who should have vote in Parha ment, whether he should endure for his lifetyme, except some cryme or offence interveen, or for a shorter tyme at the pleasure of the Kirk, they thought good to referr the same to this present Assembly : Therfor the GeneraU Assembly, having reasoned at OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 115 length upon the said question touching the continuance of him that shaU vote in ParUament, finds, and, after voting, decerns, that he shall annuatim give an account of his commission obtained from the General Assembly, and lay downe the same at their feet, to be continued or altered by his Majesty and the Assembly, as the Assembly, with consent of his Majesty, shaU think most expedient for the weU of the Kirk. " It is statut and ordained, That none of them that shaU have vote in ParUament shaU come as Commissioners to any General Assembly, or have vote in the same, in any tyme coming, ex cept he be authorized with Commission from his own Presbytery to that effect. " It is found by the Assembly, That crimen ambitus shaU be a sufficient cause of deprivation of him who shaU have vote in Par- lament. " It is statut and ordained, That every minister intimate this ;eneraU, that vote in ParUament is concluded by the Assembly, and that none utter speeche in pulpit contrair to the same." The GeneraU Commission was renewed, wherwith the chief plot ters of Episcopacie were authorized, almost the same who were nominat in the former : Messrs James Nicolson, Alexander For- besse, Alexander Douglas, Alexander Lindsay, George Gladstones, David Lindsay, Andrew Lamb, Gawen HamUton, Eobert Font, Eobert Howie, Andrew Knox, James Law, John Spotswood, Patrick GaUoway : Some others were joined with them, but their souls came not into their secrets. The King might proceed in execution of the Commission with nyne of the number without the rest. The ministers of Edinburgh were charged, upon the 12th of August, [1600] by the King and CounseU, to depart out of the towne — aU, except the two young men that entered last ; and discharged to preach in the King's dominions, because they wold not professe to the people, that they were perswaded that the Earle of Gowrie and his brother wold have killed the King in St Johnstoun, upon the 5th of August ; and perswade the people to beleeve the same. H2 116 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION They offered to thank God for his dehverance out of a danger, to rehearse faithfully to the people the history as his Majesty de- Uvered it, and to speak nothing in the contraire ; but that was not accepted. Not long after, their places were declared vacant by the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly. Upon the 5th of Sep tember they were charged to compear before the King and Coun seU in StirUng, to hear farther punishment decerned against them. Messrs WilUam Watson, Walter BalcanqueU, John HaU, James Bal four, professed they were resolved, and were appointed to pubhsh their resolution in the Kirks designed to them, and to confesse their error and incredulity. The Court gave out that they were sent to make their repentance. Mr Eobert Bruce professed, that he was not yet resolved, but craved tyme to search and try. He is ordained to depart out of the countrey, not to return to England nor Scotland without his Majestie's Ucence, and to remaine in Airth tUl his departure. The King, with advice of the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly, appointed a meeting of two out of every Synod, to be holden at Edinburgh in October, to take some order for the Kirk of Edinburgh, and to consult with the Commissioners upon such things as were to be proponed to the nixt ParUament. At this meeting the King was earnest to have others planted in the Mi nisters of Edinburgh their roomes, (notwithstanding the pubhshing of their resolution,) except Mr John HaU, whom, said the King, I wiU take in mine owne hand. It was answered, That could not be done, unlesse they were deposed by the Kirk, or cutt off by some civiU judicatory ; yet the King was so headstrong, it was thought good to try their owne mindes, if they wold be content with transportation rather than that their kirks should vaik. Mr James MelviU, Mr William Scot and Mr John Carmichael were directed to deaU with them, After they were gone forth, the King and the Commissioners took hold of the opportunity, [and] obtained the nomination of these three to vote at the nixt Parhament, which was to be holden in November, to wit, Mr David Lindsay, Mr Peter Blackburne, Mr George Gladstones, without regard to the OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 117 Cautions and Order concluded at the last Assembly ; howbeit this meeting had not the power or strength of a GeneraU Assembly. The three brethren directed to deaU with the ministers of Edin burgh understood nothing of the matter tUl the meeting was dis solved. At the nixt ParUament, whereat Gowrie was forfaulted, the three who were nominat voted. In the Synod of Fife, conveened at Saint Andrews in February foUowing, anno 1601, Mr George Gladstones being chaUenged, confessed that he sat in the last ParUament and answered as bishop when he was caUed, but aUedged that it was against his heart, because they wold not name him otherwise. Such were the slight shifts they had when they were found guUty of any breach. Mr David Lindsay was rebuked in face of the Synod of Lothian, which was holden in Aprile, by Mr John Davidson. There was a meeting of ministers in Bruntisland, in March 1601, where it was aggreed, that the King be dealt with for the restoring of the ministers of Edinburgh to their places, and a free GeneraU Assembly to put all matters debatable to a point. The Commis sioners of the GeneraU Assembly promised to deal with him to that effect ; but how did they performe their promise in the first, when some of them said to the King, " Now Sir, seeing- they are out, blame yourselfe, if ever they anger you again ?" As for the last, it is true they proceeded not further in their course, at the nixt Assembly, but matters debatable were not put to a point. The nixt GeneraU Assembly was appointed to be holden at St Andrews the last Tuesday of July [1601] ; but, by the King's direction, it was anticipat, and holden in May in Bruntisland; wherupon sundry were disappointed. When there was appear ance that Mr Patrick Simpson was to be chosen Moderator, the King would needs have the leets changed, and a neutraU man chosen. So Mr John HaU was chosen, who was no neutraU man, but a dissembler, and a secret advancer of the King's course. Mr James MelvUl being detained by sicknesse, sent a letter to this Assembly. La the letter, he desyreth them to insist with his Majesty to yeeld to the agreement of the brethren conveened at 118 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Bruntisland in March ; giveth his advice for repossessing the mi nisters of Edinburgh ; for processe against them wUl be hard, transportation fashious and fuU of inconveniences. He chargeth them, as they wUl answer to God, to labor for a redresse of that wrong, which Christ and his Kirk hath sustained by the act and decreet of Secret CounseU, whereby the ministers of Edinburgh were discharged to preach at any time hereafter, in any part of the countrey. He wUleth them to try if proceedings have been con- forme to the conclusions of the Est Assembly, — otherwise it is not possible to hold out corruption ; and to complain of the restraint of the freedome of GeneraU AssembUes, which are now made to depend upon Ucences, letters, and proclamations ; whereas burgesses and barrons enjoy their privffedges freely. In end, he layeth down his commission at their feet, as the pyoner doth his burthen ; for it had greeved him continuaUy, and now brought him into extreame danger of his Ufe. Howbeit he was not privy to their greatest secrets ; yet, ye see, it greeved him to sit somtymes among them, aud countenance their meetings, howbeit he consented not to their decreet and sentences. The King took the letter out of the Moderator's hand, suffered it not to be read, but put it up in his pocket, and laid it amongst his writs, as Mr James [MelvUl] was informed. Mr John Davidson sent his letter likewise to this Assembly. " Should James and John," said he, " be seeking to sitt, one at the right hand, another at the left, when Christ is going to Jerusalem to suffer death? Is it tyme for Baruch to seek great things for himselfe, when the Lord is about to destroy the thing he hath planted, and threatneth his people with fearfuU captivity? Is it tyme for us now, when so many of our worthy brethren are shame fully thurst out of their places and callings, without aU order of just proceeding against them, et boni malis deputantur, and Papists, Jesuits, Atheists, dayly flocking home, are suffered, countenanced, and advanced to great roomes in the realme ? Is it tyme for us of the ministrie to be enveigled and blindfolded with pretence of pre ferment of some smaU number of our brethren, and that, not to OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 119 stand so much in the ordinance and election of the Kirk, as at the pleasure of the Court, to have vote in Parliament, to ride with foot mantles, and have the titles of prelacies, and so to make the pre parative in ourselves of that Hierarchie, as they caU it, which the Papists mynd with speed to enjoy ? What is this but honorari in tra palatiwm ad servitutem ? ShaU we, brethren, like Sampson, sleep stiU in Dehlah's lapp, tiU they cry ' The PhUistins be upon thee, Samson ?' " and much more he hath to this purpose. In the post script, he wisheth they wold not determine any thing de presenti, touching the new planting of Edinburgh, in prejudice of their brethren not yet displaced by order, for any promise de futuro, touching punishment of Papists ; for these two cannot consist to gither. E reason found no place, he desireth them to remember, that melius et optabilius est egregium bellum, pace impia, et a Deo dis- trahente. His letter was read in the Assembly, and allowed ; but, the King aUedging there was treason in it, he was committed to the Castle of Edinburgh, in May, and afterward confined in his paroch for his letter, tUl his departure out of this Ufe. Howbeit the Assembly began with small contentment to either party ; yet the King, to win the hearts of the people, because of the jealousie many had of the fact committed at Perth, in August before, protested, with the tear in his eye, that he should be for ward for the Kirk and the hberty of the GospeU. For farther satisfaction, that was approved by the Court, and many of the ministerie, which before was not only neglected, but mocked at ; to wit, to rype up the causes of defection in aU estates, from the purity and zeaU of the practice of true reUgion, and to advise upon the remedies. So that in this they had a taste of their wonted Assemblyes. The causes and remedies, for brevitie's sake, I omitt : " yet," as Mr James MelvUl observeth, " there was smaU sincerity in the cheef directors and others of that faction ; for, neither were the chief causes of defection laid open, nor a right course taken for remedy." The distraction among brethren, the cause, and the remedy were not touched. The King was so headstrong against the three ministers of Edinburgh, Mr James [Balfour], Mr Walter 120 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION [BalcanquaU], Mr WiUiam [Watson], that, for his satisfaction, it was ordained that they be transported, and planted where the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly shall think expedient. The GeneraU Commission was renewed, and aU the same persons almost authorized with it ; so that the plotters were not changed ; howsoever others wer put out or in as they thought expedient. About the end of the Assembly the King vowed, holding up his hand, to execute justice faithfully, to discredit aU such as should attempt any thing in prejudice of rehgion. The GeneraU Assembly was appointed, at the last, to be holden the last Tuesday of July 1602 ; but it was prorogat by the King's proclamation to the 10th of November, and was holden in the King's ChappeU at Holyroodhouse. Before Mr James MelviU gave his voice at the election of the Moderator, he protested as foUoweth : — " With aU reverence to your Majestie, before I speak any thing in this Assembly, I must protest, that seeing it is con veened extraordinarUy, and not at the tyme appointed at the last Assembly by your Majestie's authority, and is keept here within your Majestye's palace, a place not accustomed heretofor for hold ing the Assembhes of the Kirk, whatsoever shaU be done therein contrary to the Word of God, the former constitutions of the Kirk, and estabUshed discipline of the same, (which God forbidd,) to be null, and of no effect, and that it be remedied at the nixt ordinar GeneraU Assembly of the Kirk of Scotland." Strict order was taken for visitation of Presbytries and particu lar kirks, and the order of the Visitors proceedings was sett downe ; but sundry who wer plotting for bishopricks were nominat Visi tors ; yea, some to be visitors of the bounds whereof they were al ready stiled Bishops ; to wit, Mr David Lindsay to be Visitor of Eosse, Mr George Gladstones, of Caithnesse, that under colour of visitation they might be put in possession of ecclesiasticaU juris diction. It was espyed, and the farr greater number opposed, yet by cunning convoy and the King's authority, it was caryed. The ProvinciaU Synod of Fife, which conveened at Kinghorn, in September preceding, aggreed upon some greevances to be pre- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 121 sented in certain articles to this Assembly : That the GeneraU AssembUes were not orderly keept, notwithstanding the Act of ParUament and acts of AssembUes, but the dyets were altered without the knowledge of the Presbytries and Synods ; that mi nisters are caUed befor the King and CounseU in prima instantia, for doctrine and discipline ; that the Government of the chief af fairs of the Kirk continueth in the hands of some few, under the colour of a commission, to the prejudice of Synods and Presbytries; that Doctors of Divinity and Professors of Divinity were debarred from AssembUes ; that the Assembly hath taken no tryaU hitherto anent the Cautions set down for avoiding corruption in the Com missioners, voters in ParUament ; that there is Uttle deUberation or reasoning had in weighty matters, wherby conclusions passe in GeneraU AssembUes, almost the half of the brethren gainsaying, which breedeth distraction. Sundry other particulars they regrate. Their greevances were often rejected ; but, at last, by reason of their importunity, they were read. Some others were appointed to advise with some of them upon the remedies, which were read in the Assembly and aUowed ; to wit, That the GeneraU Assembly be keept according to the Act of Parhament 1592 ; that his Ma jesty proceed against ministers according to his owne declaration, enacted in the Assembly holden at Dundee 1597 ; that aU com missions be given and used henceforth according to the acts of the GeneraU AssembUes ; that Doctors having lawfuU commission have vote in GeneraU AssembUes ; that the Caveats be looked to and precisely keept in aU tyme coming, under the pains contained in the act made thereanent; that nothing be done or concluded in Assembhes except it be sufficiently reasoned and dehberated. But how weU wer these things put in practises ! The GeneraU Commission was renewed, wherewith the same persons were authorized as before. The brethren appointed to sit on the constant Platt, with the King's Commissioners, produced their overtures, resolving in three heads ; [whereof the tenor follows : — ] " If every particular Minister's stipend being assigned out of 122 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION the fruits of the Kirk where he serveth, by the benevolence of the tacksmen, that they may grant to the augmentation of the said stipend. " If there shaU be a perpetuaU security made to the said tacks men of their tithes, upon a speciaU grassum to be condescended upon for each chalder, for the space of nineteen years ; and to be renewed yearly thereafter, for the said space, for the like grassum, upon this condition, that the said principaU tacksmen [shaU grant and] renew the like security to their sub-tacksmen, for pay ment of their part of the said grassum pro rata, where any sub- tacks are. " Or if the great Benefices shaU be provided to Ministers upon this condition, that aU the kirks of the prelacies be planted with sufficient ministers, and be provided with competent Uvings, as the modifiers of the constant Platt shaU think expedient, and he to pay to the King's Majesty, yearly, the tenth part of the fruits of the said benefice which shaU rest by and attour the sustentation of the said Ministers ; and that aU the inferior benefices shaU be provided to ministers serving the cure of the said kirks, as weU Personages as Vicarages. " Or if aU the great Benefices shaU be dissolved, and the Prelate to have the principaU kirk of the Prelacie, with the temporaU land thereof, and the rest of the kirks to be provided with qualified ministers ; and the said Prelate and titulars of the said kirks to pay a yearly duety to his Majesty, as the benefice may bear, at the sight of the Commissioners foresaid." The King and the plotters purpose was perceaved. A better overture than any of the three was presented ; to wit, A formed Platt for planting aU the kirks within the realme, by dissolving of the prelacies, and planting of fifty Presbytries in their place, of which the Commissioners should have vote in ParUament. This was the platforme set downe by Commission from his Majestie and Estates of Parliament, anno 1597. This overture found no place ; for the plotters had prepared men for their owne purpose. So, by the evU advised multitude, the second overture was accept- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 123 ed, bearing the provision of ministers to aU the prelacies, with the conditions therein expressed. It was thought expedient by this Assembly to nominat and ad- joine others to these who were nominat by the Commissioners of the Synods, conveened at Holyroodhouse the 15th of October 1600, out of the which number, his Majesty may make choice of such as he wUl present to the vacant benefices. The names of the whole num ber foUoweth: Messrs Eobert Pont, Eobert Howie, James Nicolson, Alexander Scrimgeour, John Forbesse, Gawen HamUtone, George Munro, James Eobertson, John Howisone, James MelvUl, Andrew Knox, Patrick GaUoway, Alexander Douglas, Alexander Lindsay, Eobert Wilkie, John Spotswood, WiUiam Malcolme, Alexander Forbesse, John Knox, Andrew Lamb, John Clappertoun, George Graham, Eobert Bruce, Patrick Lindsay, John Carmichael. This forme of election is different from that which is set downe before the Caveats at Montrose. Sundry have been preferred to prelacies not contained in this roU, nor chosen according to the order con descended upon before, as Mr John Abernethy, now Bishop of Caithnesse ; Mr Adam BaUendin, now Bishop of Dumblane ; Mr James Law, first Bishop of Orknay, and after Bishop of Glasgow ; Mr Andrew Boyd, Bishop of Argyle ; Mr David Lindsay, now Bishop of Edinburgh ; Mr John MaxweU, now Bishop of Eosse ; Mr Thomas Sydserfe, Bishop of Breichen ; [Mr John] LesUe, the last Bishop of the Isles. Mr George Gladstones, Mr David Lindsay, and Mr Patrick Blackburne, are not nominat in this catalogue, because they were already presented to bishopricks. Sundry are here nominat for the fashion, and rather for a mock than in good earnest, who were never purposed to accept ; to wit, Messrs Eobert Bruce, James MelvUl, John Forbesse, John Car michael, John Knox. As for Mr Eobert Bruce, howbeit he was suffered to returne to his native countrey, yet was he never suffered to preach in Edinburgh again. He was content to acquiesce in the proceed ings of the ParUament against Gowrie ; but that wold not con tent the King, unlesse he wold promise to professe it pubhctly in 124 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION sermon that he was resolved. And if he had, there is no likely- hood that they wold have suffered him, more than Mr James Bal four and Mr William Watson ; for they knew very weU the waUs of Jericho could not rise, if such a trumpet sounded as it was wont to do in Edinburgh. Nor yet was he suffered to remaine near to Edinburgh, but confyned many years in the North, and, in the end, in his own dweUing-house of Kinnaird, where he ended his dayes the year 1631, [in the 72d year*] of his age. The same day, (that is, the 25th of February 1603,) that the Commissioners of the GeneraU AssembUe declared that Mr Eobert Bruce bis place vaiked, and his re-entrie failled through his owne default ; they ordained, the King himself being present, Sir John Ker of Littledeane to adhere to Dame Margaret Whitlaw, (her hus band, the Laird oflnnerweek, yet Uving,) with whom he had com mitted adultery before, and to be absolved from the sentence of ex communication pronounced by the ministers of the South. So weeU did their proceedings agree with other. Mr James Law, afterward Bishop of Glasgow, absolved them ; but the Lord justifyed, within few years, f the sentence pronounced by the ministers of the South. The King, in his harrangue in the great Kirk of Edinburgh, the 3d of April 1603, two dayes before his departure to England, thank ed God that he had settled both Kirk and Kingdome, in that es tate which he mynded not to alter in any wayes, his subjects living in peace. The hke he promised for the Discipline of the Kirk, upon the 5th of AprUe, to the Commissioners of the Synod of Lothian, meeting him above Haddingtoune, when he was in his journey to England ; but yet [he] could not be moved, at then- request, to grant rehefe to Mr Andrew MelvUl and Mr John Davidson from their confynement, nor liberty to Mr Eobert Brace to re-enter in Edinburgh. When Ormestoun, a Uttle before, had requested for Mr Davidson, he answered, His hands were bound by a promise made to the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly. * Bruce was bom about the year 1559 : see Life prefixed to the Wodrow Society edition of Ms Sermons. t See Calderwood's History, vol. vi. p. 205. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 125 A conference was appointed by the King, to be holden in Janu ary 1604, at Hamptoun Court. Many expected a reformation of the corruptions of the Church of England ; but some wer appointed to reason against them who never took them to heart, and were rather prevaricators, and false, than sincere disputers. The rest were dashed or mocked. Mr Patrick Galloway sent a coppie of the con ference, revised, as he aUedged, by the King himselfe, to the Pres bytrie of Edinburgh, farr different from that which is extant in print, and yet importing but slender or no reformation. Mr James MelvUl, being present when it was read, desyred the brethren to have compassion upon their godly and learned brethren in England, who were disappointed of the reformation which they had so long expected ; to be grieved with them ; and to pray for them. In February and March foUowing, in a proclamation against Papists, Jesuits and Seminarie priests, the King professed, not withstanding, that he was much obhdged to him who was Pope for the present. In another proclamation, * the forme of their Church government, [and] the Service Book were ratifyed and approved, and a Convention of the clergie was appointed to treat and agree upon such orders, canons and constitutions, as were to be observed in tyme coming. Their Canons and Constitutions were ratified by the King. So the godly were put out of hope of reformation; and, not long after, 300 ministers were suspended, deprived, sUenced or excommunicated. Had we not need then to doubt of the stabihty of our DiscipUne ? In the ParUament holden at Perth, in July 1604, when Com missioners were chosen to treat with the EngUsh upon the Union, some noblemen, barrons and burgesses craved a clause to be insert ed in the commission for preserving the estate of rehgion, both of doctrine and discipline, in the owne freedome and sincerity. They craved the assistance of the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assem bly ; but Uttle thought or care had they of the matter which be wrayed their treachery, and that the overthrow of the Church dis- * This proclamation relates to the Church of England. 126 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION cipline and government was intended, notwithstanding of promises and protestations made in the contrair. Yet William, Earle of Mor ton, insisted so earnestly in open ParUament, that howbeit the clause was not insert in the commission, yet, in the first act made in fa vours of the Kirk, it was provided, that rehgion should not be prejudged either in doctrine or discipline by this Commission : but whether it be extant in the Eegister, Earn uncertaine. Mr David Lindsay, Bishop of Eosse, Mr George Gladstones, Bishop of Cathnesse, and Mr John Spotswood, Bishop of Glasgow, were put up in the roU of the Commissioners ; but there foUowed no in convenience at that tyme, because the Treatie for the Union was crossed. In a Synod holden at Tranent in August [1604], Mr John Spotswood and Mr John Law were chaUenged, for seeking, by in direct means, the overthrow of the DiscipUne. They protested they had no such intention, but only to recover the Kirk rents ; yet the brethren being jealous of their proceedings, urged them to subscrive the Confession of Faith of new with the rest of the brethren. They subscrived the Confession of Faith, printed in foho anno 1596, with the rest of the brethren in East and West Lothian. There remain yet ahve of the subscrivers, Mr Adam Colt, Mr Andrew BlackhaU, Mr Andrew Mackghie, Mr John Adamson, Daniel WaUace, Mr David OgyU, Nathaniel Harlaw, Mr William Penman, Mr William Arthur, Mr Peter Hewat, Mr Eichard Dicksone, Mr Gavin MackkeU, John Ker, minister at Line. Howbeit the chief watch-towers of our Kirk, Edinburgh and St Andrews, were spoUled and denuded of their faithfuU watchmen ; Mr Brace and Mr Davidson confyned ; yet the plotters for Epis- copacie, and overthrow of our Church government perceaved, that their course could not be so speedUy advanced as they wished, unlesse the Kirk were bereft of her hberty to indict and hold free GeneraU AssembUes ; because they were to be comptable to the Generall Assemblies. They laboured that there should be no Assembly at aU to crave account, till they got strength and power OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 127 to overrule them then as they pleased, nor then, but when they pleased. This was foreseen by judicious and prudent men of the ministery, and sundry means were used for preservation of the U- berty of the Kirk. The Synod of Fife dealt with Mr John HaU, Moderator of the penult GeneraU Assembly, to intreat for an Assembly to be holden before the last ParUament, according to the custome observed in former tymes. He reported, that he had written to the King, but could not obtain it. The Presbytrie of Edinburgh wrot to Mr Patrick GaUoway, Moderator of the last Assembly, when he was last at Court, to deaU with his Majesty to the same effect. After diverse delayes of answers, at length he promised to return home to that end ; but when he and the Bishop of Eosse returned from Court, no such effect foUowed ; yea, they reported in a fuU Convention of ministers, directed from Synods, that the King had answered, It was needless, because nothing was to be treated at the nixt Parhament but the Union of the two Eealmes, whereby the order and discipUne of the Kirk was nowayes to be prejudged. The Commissioners from Synods aUedged the union could not be concluded, without union of Churches in go vernment and forme of worship ; and that such as voted in the name of the Kirk, were bound by the Cautions to propone nothing in ParUament or any other convention, without express warrand and direction from the GeneraU Assembly. The new-named bishops and other Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly, ad vancers of the EpiscopaU course, were not pleased with such answers, and, therefore, broke up the conference, as was their cus tom when they were crossed. When the dyet appointed by the last ordinary General Assembly was approaching, Sir David Mur ray, Lord of Scoone, brought from Court, among other articles, one for continuation of the Assembly. The Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly, at the King's di rection, sent their letters to the Presbytries in June, and prorogat the dyet appointed by the last GeneraU Assembly to the first Tuesday of July 1605, or a shorter dyet upon new advertisement, declaring it was his Majesty's pleasure. The Presbytries, forbearing 128 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION to offend his Majesty, acquiesced, yet ceased not to crave the dyet to be hastened, by reason of urgent necessities. Iniquity did abound ; idolatrie did increase ; Jesuits and Seminarie priests traf- fiqued and traveUed through the countrey securely ; malefactors eluded the inferior judicatories of the Kirk, by appeUations to a GeneraU Assembly, which they did never expect. The Presbytries of St Andrews, notwithstanding, resolved to keep the dyet appointed by the last Assembly, to wit, the last Tuesday of July 1604 ; because the warrand of keeping it was greater than the warrand of continuation, seeing the Union intend ed was nothing hindered thereby. Messrs James MelvUl, WiUiam Erskine, WiUiam Murray were directed, as Commissioners, to that effect, who presented their commission to the parish kirk of Aber deen upon the last Tuesday of July, about four afternoon, before Messrs Peter Blackbume, James Eosse, Archibald Blackburne, ministers at Aberdeen, John Bough, minister at Nigg, Mr Thomas Nicolson, Commissarie of Aberdeen, George Nicolson burgesse, and Mr Thomas MoUison, Walter Eobertson, David Marr, notars, and withaU presented their protestation which was read in their audi ence, and subscrived in their presence. They made their protesta tions by word conforme thereunto, and took documents and instru ments in the hands of the con-notars. In this Protestation they protested, that they were there present for keeping the said Assem bly, that it desert not, so farr as in them lay ; and protested, befor God, that whatsoever dammage, detriment, or interest the Kirk of Scotland shaU incurr by the neglecting of the said Assembly, it be not imputed to the Presbytry of St Andrews : and for remedy, agreeable to the Word of God, laws of the realme, acts and consti tutions of our Kirk, and the old practice and hberty thereof, when God shaU think expedient. Howbeit this day was not keept, yet it was prorogated, at his Majestie's desire, by a letter sent the Presbyteries, subscrived by the King's Commissioner and the last Moderator, and con tinued till the first Tuesday of July 1605, at the farthest, unlesse they were advertised of another dyet sooner, and declared it OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 129 was his Majestie's pleasure. The best affected brethren in the North were touched with remorse for their own neglect, when they observed the carefuUnesse of the Presbytry of St Andrews, and considered the weight of the matter itself. The three brethren directed to Aberdeen, advised them to direct from the nixt Synod, which was to be holden at Aberdeen, in August, their letters to other Synods, to request them to direct some of their number to be present at the Synod which was to be holden at St Andrews, where they may lay open their greeves, and crave their concur rence for a GeneraU Assembly. A great number conveened at St Andrews, especially out of the South and the West. Lowrestoun,* (the King's Commissioner for Kirk affairs, after the death of Sir Patrick Murray) being informed that they purposed to hold a GeneraU Assembly, had letters from the CounseU in readynesse to discharge their meeting ; but when he observed their proceedings he approved aU, and willed them to warne other Synods, to direct their Commissioners to Perth in October, to conveen with the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly. When they wer as sembled at Perth, Lowrestoun desyred the Commissioners from provinces to conveen apart, and to advise upon articles and peti tions to be sent with him to his Majesty. They went apart, ut tered their greeves to others ; regrated heavffy the decay of the hberty of the Kirk ; the usurpation of the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly, taking upon them the whole government of the Kirk; the inconveniences falUng forth thereby in aU the pro vinces ; the want of a free GeneraU Assembly. How soon these things came to the knowledge of the Commissioners of the Ge neraU Assembly, they were not suffered to conveen any longer apart. Many wold have continued their meeting apart, if the rest wold '' have consented. When they conveened with the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly, they insisted chiefly upon two gree vances : one, That the Commissioners nominat by the last Assem- * Sir Alexander Stratoun of Laureston (in Angus) knight. In the MS. the name. is variously written, Lowrestoun, Lawrestoun, Lauriston. I 130 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION bly, or rather some few of their number, arrogated to themselves the whole government of the Kirk, and the power of the GeneraU Assembly ; doing and undoing what they thought good, under the name of it ; and redacting the Kirk to an oligarchic, notwithstand ing, by good reason, their commission expyred, when the diet for the nixt Assembly appointed at the last was past. The other, That the new named bishops took upon them the boldnesse to rea son and vote in Earhament, without any commission from the Kirk, to the great shame of the Kirk. To the first, the Commis sioners of the GeneraU Assembly answered, That their Commis sion was to continue till the nixt Assembly : they were weary of that office, but the King wold deaU with no other, and that they wold find, if they attempted anything without them ; which last was true : but better none at aU, than such. As for the first part, The effects proved that they were not wearied, but that they might continue [they] procured prorogations of the Assembly; for their commission was the chief mean, whereby they wrought their owne advancement. To the nixt, Both bishops and other Commissioners not yet preferred, answered : " Let the breakers of the Cautions be severely censured." " I wold he were hanged," said Mr George Grahame, " above aU thieves, that presseth not to the outtermost to see the Cautions keept, to hold out corrup tion, the pride and tyrrany of bishops ;" and yet he himselfe had entered lately to the Bishoprick of Dunblane, without acknowledg ing the Kirk, contrair to many promises made by himselfe before. The Commissioners from Synods replyed, That ther was not a jot of the Cautions observed, either in the entry of bishops, or in their behaviour after their entry: they neglected their flocks, posted to Court, and returned Lord Bishop. The Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly desyred the brethren to reserve their greev ances to the GeneraU Assembly ; wherat they promised concur rence, and, if they failled, were content never to be esteemed as brethren again. It was replyed, That aU greevances were remitted to a Generall Assembly ; and, in the meantyme, such as feared con- trolment, and had credit at Court, procured continuation tUl cus- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 131 tome had corroborated corruption, and moyen were made even amongst the ministery, for their advancement and standing be twixt them and Christ by it, when he shaU caU them to an ac count. In the end, they aggried upon four points to be petitioned : First, That a GeneraU Assembly may be holden without offence Of his Majesty, according to the Act of Farhament, and custome of the Kirk. Second, That order may be taken with Papists and contemners of the censures and discipUne of the Kirk. Third, That their godly and faithfuU brethren persecuted by the EngUsh Bishops may be suffered to enjoy their offices and livings. The Court claw-backs opponed prophanely and ridiculously to this point, tUl they were dashed and put to sUence. Fourth, Anent the Platt, because some brethren were prejudged by the last mo dification. Lowrestoun promised to deaU faithfuUy with the King for these points ; but the plotters could undermine aU by their secret letters. Mention being made of hastening a GeneraU Assembly at the last Synod of Fife, holden in Burntisland, Lowrestoun, being now re turned from Court, and there present, withstood it with aU his might, and shewed he had an expresse article in commission, not to permitt it ; howbeit, seven severaU tymes supplication was made for preventing the tyme appointed, because of the incon veniences arising through the delay. But the Commissioners answers tended all to delay ; yet the Ministery were put in fuU assurance, that if the dyet wer not prevented, yet the tyme ap pointed should hold without faiU. But when the dyet appointed in July 1605 was approaching, the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly sent letters to the Presbytries to supersede that dyet, tiU after the nixt approaching ParUament, without intimation of another place or dyet to which the Assembly should be continued. It was not sent till the tyme was so near that one Presbytery could not understand what another had done. And what think ye was to be done at the nixt ParUament? Even the restitution of the Estate of Bishops. i2 132 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION The Ministery having used aU these means to procure his Ma jestie's consent for hastening the Assembly, the last day appointed by the Commissioners former letter of continuation approaching ; the Presbytries and Synods, seeing the many inconveniences al ready faUen forth through the delay of it, and greater hke to foUow upon the deserting of it, to wit, the losse of, the Kirk's hberty to indict GeneraU Assemblyes, directed their Commissioners to keep the Assembly. For, by the Act of ParUament 1592, the GeneraU Assembly preceeding must appoint the nixt Assembly foUowing, with his Majesty's or his Commissioner's consent, if they be pre sent. If, therefor, that dyet be not keept, and Assembly holden, there cannot be another dyet appointed by the Kirk ; and so there could be no Assembly holden but when it pleased the King and the aspyring Frelates. What great consequence there was in the losse of this hberty, judicious men of the ministery saw then, and the whole countrey feeleth now. Bishops usurp and overrule, without controlment or censure of Assemblyes ; Poperie and Atheisme in crease ; Arminianisme is taught and maintained pubhckly ; inno vations are brought into the worship of God; and many are in danger of revolting from the Eeformed Beligion. The GeneraU Assemblyes were the bulwark of our Kirk, whereupon dependeth the preservation of the true rehgion [and] of the purity thereof in doctrine and discipline. Zealous and faithfuU ministers were carefuU to maintain that hberty which the Kirk hath from Christ, her King, and confirmed by the lawes of the countrey; speciaUy seeing other Estates were so carefull at this tyme to maintain their hberties. Of the Commissioners directed from the Presbytries, some keept the first [appointed] day of July, that is, the second day, according to the first letter of prorogation sent by the Commissioners from Perth, 4th July 1604. Others come not tiU the fourth and fifth dayes, because the last letter directed from Edinburgh in June last, when the dyet was approaching, which was subscrived by the same persons that subcribed the former, for staying of the said Assembly, did advise the Presbytries to whom it was directed, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 133 not to keep the first day of July, as if the first day had not been appointed before. So it feU forth, that aU that came to Aberdeen keept not one dyet. Whether this was done purposely to frustrate their meiting, that the first seeing so few, and no appearance of moe, might dissolve before the rest came, let any man judge who wiU observe the proceedings of the plotters hithertiU ; and then judge, if there be any honesty in such tricks. Upon the 2d day of July 1605, repaired to Aberdeen these Commissioners from Presbytries : Mr Eobert Durie, minister at Anstruther ; Mr Andrew Duncan, minister at CraU ; Mr John Sharp, minister at Kilmany ; Mr Andrew Strachan, minister at Creigh ; Mr John Forbesse, minister at Aufurd ; Mr WiUiam For besse, minister at Kinbethok; Mr James Eving, minister at Touchej Mr Eobert Youngson, minister at Clatt ; Mr Eobert Eeid, minister at Bancherie-Trinity ; Mr Charles Fairholme, minister at Fraser burgh ; Mr William Davidson, minister at Eathen ; Mr David Eo- bertson, minister at Eugley ; Mr John Munro, minister at Taine ; Mr Archibald Blackburne, minister at Aberdeen ; Mr James Eosse, minister at Aberdeen ; and John Eough, minister at Nigg. After that Mr James Eosse, ordinary minister of the towne, had ended his sermon, they wer purposed to begin the Assembly ; but, missing the Moderator of the last Assembly, Mr Patrick GaUoway, and supposing that sundry of their brethren were stayed through injury of the weather and rising of the waters, they conveened in the kirk with Lowrestoun, the King's Commissioner, and with mutuaU consent continued their downsitting till two afternoon. At two afternoon, they conveened in the session-house of the kirk of Aberdeen. Immediately after incaUing on the name of God by Mr David Eait, Moderator of the last ProvinciaU Assembly holden at Aberdeen, they sent for Mr Thomas Nicolson, the ordinar Clerk of the Generall AssembUes. La the meantyme, Lowrestoun en tered, sat downe among them, presented a missive from the Coun seU, indorsed to the Ministery conveened in their Assembly at Aberdeen, and desired it to be read and answered. It was an swered, That it could not be orderly receaved, read, nor answered, 134 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION tUl a Moderator wer chosen. Lowrestoun named Mr John For besse to be mouth to the rest ; but they answered, It behoved them to keep the order of election. He removed of his owne accord, lest, as he himself aUedged, he should be chaUenged for seeming to approve the said election by his presence, in case it should hap pen that he and they could not agree. The ordinary Clerk was desired likewise to do his office, and remain with them; but he refused, tUl he might see their proceedings content Lowrestoun, and removed himself likewise. Thereafter, Messrs John Munro, Eobert Durie, John Forbesse wer put on the leets ; but when they wer to remove, the brethren, willing to acquiesce in Lowrestoun's nomination, stayed them, and aggreed that Mr John Forbesse should be Moderator. After that he had incaUed the name of God, they chose Mr John Sharp to be their Clerk for the tyme. Thereafter, the CounseU's letter was read and considered. As for the first point, Concerning the dissolving of their present Assem bly, it was concluded, that they would suspend aU treating of matters tUl a new Assembly. As concerning the second, which was, Not to appoint any new dyet for another General Assembly, it was thought necessary to appoint a new dyet for the reasons above mentioned ; yet they thought it expedient first to acquaint Lowrestoun, and to desire him to nominat a day, long or short, to which they wer resolved to condescend. He returned at then- request, and found himselfe weU satisfied with their answer to the first point ; but as to the second, he refused to assigne any tyme, long or short, howbeit they assured him they were ready, for the respect they had to his Majesty, to continue as befor, to a certain day, if his Majesty desyred them. After reasoning, at length he was brought to consider the expedience and necessity of that point, but wold not condescend, because, as he aUedged, he had not a warrand. It was therfor declared unto him, that it behoved them to appoint a day ; whereupon he removed himselfe again willingly, howbeit he was desyred by some brethren to stay and hear what was concluded. He aUedged as befor, that he did it for fear to be chaUenged. The door was always ready to be OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 1 35 opened to him, first and last, when it should please him to re enter. After his removaU, the treating of aU matters was con tinued tUl the last Tuesday of September nixt, the tyme appointed by them for the nixt Assembly to be holden at Aberdeen ; and it was ordained, that intimation be made to aU the Eresbyteries within the realme, that they might send their Commissioners to the place, and at the day appointed. When they were about to dissolve, Lowrestoun returned, and protested, That he did not acknowledge their meeting for a lawful Assembly from the beginning, because of the absence of the last Moderator and the ordinar Clerk of the GeneraU Assemblyes. The Moderator, in name of the brethren, protested, That it behoved to be a lawfuU Assembly notwithstanding, in respect of the war rand of God's Word, lawes of the countrey, constitutions, con- tinuaU custome and practise of the Kirk, and a particular warrant for that day and place subscribed by himselfe, Mr Eatrick Gal loway, Moderator of the last Assembly, and Eichard Thomson, Clerk to the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly. Lowrestoun caused John Wishart, messenger, charge them, under the pain of horning, to suffer their Assembly to desert. The messenger gave the Moderator, in name of the rest, ane coppie of the charge. This was needlesse ; for they had already concluded to dissolve ¦upon the expresse desire of the Lords of Secret CounseU's letter. The charge being read and considered, the Moderator, at direction of the brethren, took documents and notes in the hands of the messenger, who was also a notar pubUck, that they were ready instantly to obey the charge, and that in presence of diverse wit nesses. He refusing the benefit of his office in that part, they dis solved after the Moderator had given thanks to God, — went im mediately to the common Clerk, Mr Thomas MoUeson's chamber, and took instruments and documents in his hands, of their obe dience to the said charge. Upon the Fryday after, come sundry Commissioners from other Presbyteries of Kyle, Carrick, Cunninghame, Lothian, Merce, Strathem. They were partly hindered by the speats of waters ; 136 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION partly deceaved by the Commissioners missives sent to their Pres byteries to inhibit them, pointing at the fifth day. Mr John Welsh, Mr Nathan Eagles, Mr James Greig,* Mr John Young, Mr Archibald Simpson, Mr Abraham Henderson, NathanieU Harlaw, Mr Thomas Abernethie and John Eosse, finding the brethren dis solved before their coming, and having receaved a subscribed coppie of their proceedings, went togither to the place where the Assembly was holden, and for the discharge of their commissions, took documents in the hands of two notars, that they were come to keep the said Assembly, and finding the same dissolved, did ratifie and approve the proceedings thereof in their own names, and in the names of the Presbyteries that sent them. The Commissioners reported their proceedings to their own Presbytries, which were approved in aU points, as also by other Presbyteries. Lowrestoun made a sinistrous report of their proceedings at Aberdeen, and that he had discharged them, by open proclamation, at the mercat crosse of Aberdeen the day preceeding, to hold any Assembly. Upon the 24th of July, Mr John Forbesse, being in Edinburgh of purpose to satisfy the Lords of Secret CounseU anent the al- ledged disobedience to his Majestie's charge, was warned by a macer to compear before the Lords of Secret CounseU. There conveened betwixt six and seven in the morning, six Lords and seven or eight Bishops, and Commissioners of the GeneraU As sembly, Mr Patrick GaUoway, Mr James NicoEon, Mr John HaU, &c. They conveened the more timously to prevent the ordinar tyme of the CounseU, where they feared the opposition of some of the NobUity. He was commanded to enter in waird in the Castle of Edinburgh, because he wold not condemne the Assembly holden at Aberdeen ; howbeit he was content to submitt himselfe, and the proceedings thereat, to the judgment of the Generall As sembly. Mr John Welsh, being also in Edinburgh, was charged, * Hero, and also at page 138, Scot's MS. makes the name Craig, instead of Greig or Greg, minister of Colmonell, in Stranraer. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 137 by a macer, to compear before the CounseU the nixt day following ; because he refused to take his oath super inquirendis as he appre hended, howbeit he was willing, upon the knowledge of particular interrogatories. He was committed to the jayUe of Edinburgh tiU eleven hours, and then both he, and Mr John Forbesse, were transported to Blacknesse. Upon the 25th of July, charge was given, by open proclama tion, to the provests and baiUies of burghs, speciaUy of Aberdeen, to suffer no ministers to enter within their bounds upon the first Tuesday of September nixt to come, nor eight dayes before or after to hold any Assembly, as was appointed by the ministers lately assembled at Aberdeen. Upon the 2d of August, Mr Eobert Durie, Mr Andrew Duncan, Mr Alexander Strachan, and Mr John Sharp, being summoned before, compeared before the CounseU, and were sent to Black nesse, because they refused to condemne their proceedings at Aberdeen. In the mean tyme the pest broke up in Edinburgh, Leith, St Andrews, and other parts of the countrey. Upon the 8th of August, Presbyteries, Sessions, Synods, and Ministers in particular, were discharged, by proclamation, to authorise, approve, justifie, or aUow the proceedings of the minis ters at Aberdeen. Noblemen, gentlemen, barrons, magistrats and other leidges, were charged to report to the CounseU when they heard any minister, either in sermon or private conference, justify their proceedings, or condemn the proceedings of the Counsell, &c, with certification if they faUled, &c. Much bussinesse was there made for the annuUing of this Assembly, because of their appointment of a new 'Assembly for preservation of the Uberty granted by Act of ParUament ; which Uberty standing, there was no appearance that Episcopacie could be advanced. Upon the 3d of October, other fourteen ministers, who had been at Aberdeen, being cited, compeared befor the Lords of the Secret Counsell. Seven of the number wer committed to waird for the same cause that other brethren wer befor : Mr Charles Fairholme, 138 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION and Mr John Munro in the castle of Downe ; Mr Nathan Inglesj and Mr James Greig in the castle of Dumbarton ; Mr James E- ving, and Mr WiUiam Forbesse, and John Eoss, in the castle of Stirhng. Mr Archibald Blackburne, Mr Eobert Youngson, and some others, were drawn to confesse, that if they had known what they did then, they wold not have holden that Assembly, and, therefor, wer suffered to return to their chairges : but Mr Eobert Youngson repented, and compeared at the nixt dyet before the CounseU with the imprisoned brethren. Mr Thomas Abernethie stood to the Assembly, tiU he heard that he was to be confined in Innemesse ; then he desired to be heard again, and submitted him selfe ; wherupon he was suffered to return in peace. Some who were at that Assembly wer not cited, and so spared by God's providence. The Synod of Fife was appointed to be holden in Dumfermling upon the 2d of September ; but the ministers were not suffered to enter within the towne ; for the ChanceUour had given the Pro vost, the laird of Pitfirren,* direction to that effect, which was con trary to the Uberty granted by the Act of Parhament. They went to Innerkeithing to hold their Synod. They agreed upon a fast for the pest; the imprisoned brethren; the restraint of the GeneraU AssembUes. None, except five or six, wold agree to the holding of a GeneraU Assembly at the day and place appointed by the brethren assembled in July at Aberdeen ; yea, hardly could they be brought to seek a prorogation, because of the near- nesse of the tyme appointed, tUl May, with consent of the King and other Eresbytries ; but this took no effect. They had smaU hope that any supplication would be receaved but from the Com missioners of the GeneraU Assembly, and feared farther trouble to the imprisoned brethren. The imprisoned sent an ample Apologie to the King f to clear •their cause, by a right information of their proceedings at their * Sir Robert Halket of Pitferrane. t This Apology or Supplication to King James, dated from Blacknesse, 2d Septem ber 1605, is printed in Calderwood's Hist. vol. vi. p. 322-332. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 139 Assembly holden at Aberdeen, after they had been five weeks imprisoned ; and, withaU, a supplication for Uberty and release ; but were not heard. Because it was thought, that the Kirk was altogither spoiled of power to indict and hold GeneraU AssembUes, and that we were not to have GeneraU AssembUes again, a GeneraU Assembly was proclamed to be holden at Dundee the last Tuesday of July ; but no mention was made in what year, which was as much as to say, " Ad Grcecas Calendas" The imprisoned Ministers, after thirteen weeks imprisonment, were summoned to compear befor the CounseU upon the 24th of October 1605, to hear and see it to be found and declared, That they have very contemptuously and seditiously conveened, assembled and proceeded ; and therfor, their said Assembly, and approbation thereof, to be decerned and declared unlawftdl, and they to be pu nished in their persons and goods, for their unlawfuU holding and approving of the same, or else to shew a reasonable cause why the same should not be done ; with certification, &c. The imprisoned Ministers compeared at Edinburgh the 24th of October 1605, and gave in their supphcation, beseeching the Lords to remitt the tryaU of their cause to the Generall Assembly, the only judge competent ; seeing the lawfuUnesse, approbation or dis- aUowance of a GeneraU Assembly, or proceedings thereof, belongeth to the GeneraU Assembly, and the GeneraU Assembly foUowing hath ever aUowed or disaUowed the Assemblies preceeding and their proceedings ; as also because, in the last proclamation, his Majesty expected reparation of aU misorders at the nixt Assembly. The supphcation was read, but rejected; and they were urged, by the King's Advocat, Sir Thomas HamUton of Monkland, knight, to an swer to the lybeU ; whereupon they were constrained to give in the declinature foUowing : — My Lords of Secret Counsell, — Please your Lordships, the approbation or disallowance of a GeneraU Assembly hath been, and should be, a matter and cause spiritual!, and always cognosced 140 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION and judged by the Kirk, as Judges competent within this realme : And seeing We are caUed before your Lorships, to hear and see it found and declared, that we have very contemptuously conveened and assembled ourselves in a GeneraU Assembly, at Aberdeen, the first Tuesday of July last bypast ; and therefore, the said Assembly and approbation thereof, to be decerned and declared to be unlaw- fuU; as at more length is contained in the summonds executed against us thereanent : We, in consideration of the premisses, and other reasons to be given in by us, have just cause to dechne your Lordships judgment, as no wayes competent in the cause above specified ; and by these presents, We simpliciter dechne the same, seeing we are most willing to submitt ourselves to the tryaU of the GeneraU Assembly, only judges competent. By these presents, subscrived with our hands, as foUoweth, the 24th of October [1605.] (Sic subscribitur,) Mr John Forbesse. Mr James Greg. Mr Eobert Durie. Mr Chas. Ferholme. Mr John Welshe. Mr Eobert Youngson. Mr John Sharp. Mr John Munro. Mr John Eosse. Mr Will. Forbesse. Mr Andrew Duncan. Mr James Irving. Mr Nathan Ingles. Mr Alex. Strauchan. They were urged, notwithstanding, to answer the lybeUed sum monds, which they did for clearing of their cause, but under pro testation, and adhereing to their declinature. Their answers were amplyfied afterwards, upon occasion of their Apologies and Suppli cations. The summe of aU I have drawn up as foUoweth :— Suppose the whole lybeU were admitted, it foUoweth not that their meeting or proceedings were unlawfuU; because the true ground and warrant of ecclesiasticaU meetings are suppressed, to wit, the liberty which Christ, the Head of the Kirk, hath by his authority given to his Kirk ; and yet the civiU approbation of the Christian magistrate, moved of Christian duty, in testification of his subjection to Christ, is aUedged as the only warrant. For OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 141 this was holden as a sure ground, that the office-bearers of the Kirk may assemble when need requires, in name and authority of Christ, the Head of the Kirk, for exercise of disciphne and order ing the affairs of the Kirk ; that no King, Erince, nor Magistrate may bereave them of this power and Uberty, but ought to main- taine and conserve the same ; that the magistrate's power is cumu lative, not privative. And farther, Mr James MelvUl, in his Apo- logie for the imprisoned,* wUleth it ever to be observed, " that the Assembhes convocated, by the King appointing tyme and place by his letter and proclamations, (suppose there were an hundreth of them,) are not the ordinary Assemblyes of the Kirk, because they flow from the civill magistrate ; which is the ordinance of man, and is not %ag; cording to the lawes, none should have accesse to the assisers after they be inclosed ; for by the statute made in the eleventh Farha ment Ja. VI. July 29, anno 1587, act 91, it was ordained that aU assisers be inclosed, and none suffered to repair to them under any pretence whatsomever, nor any one of the assise to come forth, till, after agreement, they return their answer to the Judge : otherwise, the person to be pronounced clean, and innocent of the crymes aUedged, and laid to his charge. So if the benefit of the law had been granted to them, they should have been declared innocent; for it was sufficiently known that the ChanceUour of the assise came forth to the Justice and the Lords, and some, to witt, the .Clerks, resorted to the assise. Much traveU was taken to per- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 155 swade the assisers, that no harme was intended to the impanneUed in their person, life, or goods, to induce them to fyle the impan neUed ; yet six of the number cleansed them simpliciter : Sir John Livingstoun of Dunipace, Sir Archibald Stirling of Keir, Gavin Hume of Johnscleuch, Eobert Livingstoun of West-quarter, Thomas Livingstoun of Panton, James Shaw of Sauchie. When the Chan- ceUour of the assise returned, and reported the verity of the jury, Dunipace professed he absolved them not only as innocent of trea son, but also as honest ministers, faithful servants to Christ, and good subjects. It was no excuse to the rest to fyle them upon as surance of their hfe ; for the imputation of a cryme is as grievous to an honest man as the losse of his life. The Judge continued the sentence tiU the King's wUl and plea sure should be farther known, and ordained the empannelled Mi nisters to be carried back to their wairds, and to be straitly keept, that no man have accesse to them. The Ministers embraced one another, and thanked God for his presence in the whole action. They were conveyed to the place about ten hours at night, and some of the guard were appointed to attend upon them. The people said, " Certainly it is a work of darknesse to make Christ's faithfull ministers traitours. God grant the King were never in greater danger than by such traitors." Upon the morne they were convoyed to Blacknesse. Messrs Andrew MelvUl, James MelviU, John CarmichaeU, and other ministers accompanyed them, where they parted with thanksgiving, prayers, and many teares, and more confirmed in the cause. The King and the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly thought it now fitt tyme, when the ministers imprisoned in Black nesse wer convicted of treason, to try the patience and constancie of the rest of the ministery ; so terrifyed, as they supposed, with the trouble of those, that they thought nothing wold be refused. Therefor the whole Synods of the realme were, by the King's di rection, appointed to conveen in the month of February, in their owne shyres and bounds respective, aU upon one day. So one Synod could not understand the resolution of another. The King 156 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION had his Commissioner or Commissioners at every Synod, to crave answer to the five articles. These five Articles foUowing wer directed to the Synod of Merce and TiviotdaiU, with Mr David M'GUl younger, a Senator of the CoUedge of Justice, and Mr Gavin Hamilton, Bishop of GaUoway. 1. That in the nixt ensueing GeneraU Assembly, no former acts made in any preceeding Assembly (his Majesty being present), be in any way touched, altered, or interpreted. 2. That the estate of Bishops be not meddled with, but continued in the same condition they are presently in, tUl his Majestie's far ther pleasure and wiU be knowne. 3. That there be no alteration of any of the Commissioners, ex cept upon the tryaU of some notable fault in their doctrine, life, and conversation. 4. That notwithstanding of any appellation, the Commissioners shall proceed ; they always for their proceeding being answerable to the nixt GeneraU Assembly. 5. That they acknowledge the warrant of their meetings to come by permission of the Prince. Whether the same Articles were directed to aU the Synods, or others more grosse, as was reported, I am uncertain ; but the Synod of Merce and TiviotdaiU rejected those above expressed ; and others did the like, or referred to the GeneraU Assembly. The ministers of the French and Dutch churches at London, being misinformed, and stirred up by some courtiours and court ministers, sent a letter to the ministers of Edinburgh, to regrate the behaviour of the imprisoned ministers. Whereupon the Minis ters imprisoned in Blacknesse returned answer, or a true Apologe- tick ; and likewise wrote a prolix and pithie Letter to their brethren here at home, wherein they deduced their proceedings since their Assembly holden at Aberdeen ; which I omitt, because the proceed ings have already been sufficiently deduced in the preceeding history. Only this is to be remembered, that they paint out the Commis sioners of the GeneraU Assembly in their owne colours ; affirming, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 157 that, under the pretence of a Umited commission from the General Assembly, they arrogated to themselves the full jurisdiction and authority of the Kirk in aU things, and dayly did promove their in tended change of the estate of our discipline, in bringing us under the bondage, first of a perpetuaU dictatura, under the title of Com missioners, as the fynest cover of their intentions, and nixt of an- tichristian slavery of the Hierarchie ; that their purposes were dis covered by their speeches, by the presentation of some of them to their Bishopricks, with fuU authority over their brethren, and sunr dry other signs ; but especiaUy by open profession, in publick, at aU the Synods of late, where the perpetuaU dictatorship and lordly domination is perceaved to be the chief stay of our Assembly, which they fear must needs faU if these hold, and is the chief cause which moveth them with such hatefuU enmity to persist against them for their meeting at Aberdeen ; because thereby they thought their enterprise, almost accomphshed, was somewhat im peded. By the craft of the Bishops, report was made to the King that ChanceUour Seaton was upon the counseU of holding an Assembly at Aberdeen. Wherupon the Earle of Dumbarr was sent downe to try him ; but, partly by the assisting of his friends at home, and partly by the Queen and the Inghsh Secretarie their moyen, he enjoyed still his office, without exact tryaU whether it was true or /false ; and so Mr John Spotswood, Bishop of Glasgow, the delator, was disappointed ^it that tyme. In the moneth of July 1606, a Parhament was holden at Perth, wheras befor it was appointed to be holden in Edinburgh. The pretended cause of the change was the pest, which was almost none at aU. But Perth was, at that tyme, a place fitter for setting up of Bishops upon the stage of honour than Edinburgh, where they were most odious. At this Parliament, the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly were urged by Commissioners from Presbyteries, to crave that the Cautions might be insert in the Act of Parhament, which was to be made for confirmation of the Estate of bishops. They went to the 158 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Lords of the Articles for a fashion, knowing, very weU, that it wold be refused. ChanceUour Seaton said plainly, " We enter not Bishops according to the act of an Assembly, but according to that they were an hundred yeares syne." The Commissioners urged no further, howbeit this answer was not answerable to the provision made in the act 1597, concerning ministers vote in Parhament; nor agreeable to equity, that ministers should vote in Parhament, the Kirk not consenting, or, at least, not consenting but upon con ditions, and with limitations, agreed upon by the King himself and his bishops. The Commissioners from Presbyteries had no place to urge, nor yet wold have been heard ; that charge lying upon the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly. They desired them to censure Mr John Spotswood, then Bishop of Glasgow, who had spent the greatest part of the sermon he had before the Parhament against the estabhshed disciphne ; but they refused. Mr Patrick GaUoway having taught upon the Lord's day, in tyme of Parha ment, that it was not the King's intention to sett up Bishops, Lords in Parhament, to be lords over the brethren, or to have any jurisdiction over them; and, therefore, to prevent corrup tion, Cautions wer set downe by his Majesty and the GeneraU As sembly, which, if they contraveened, they shaU be esteemed in famous, the Ministers moved the Commissioners of the Assembly to conveen, and offered to prove that the Bishops had broken aU the Cautions, both in their entry to their bishopricks, and in their behaviour after. But the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assem bly referred the tryaU to the GeneraU Assembly, which, said they, is to be holden at Dundee the last Tuesday of that instant month of July. But at the rising of the ParUament it was prorogat tiU May 1607. So there was no true meaning neither in their words nor their deeds. Mr WilUam Couper, minister at Perth, had a sermon before the Estates the day preceeding the sitting down of the Parliament, to the great contentment of aU the godly ; which is yet extant to his great conviction. But none was suffered to preach again during the tyme of the Parhament, but such as favoured the course of Episcopacie. To this end it was aUedged, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 159 that the King had sent downe expresse direction who should preach. The Ministers, finding that the Cautions were not admitted by the Lords of the Articles, thought it necessary to protest. A pro testation was formed by Mr Patrick Sympson, minister at Ster ling ;• wherunto Mr James MelviU added a part, which he amphfyed after, and confirmed in every point. The protestation was sub scribed by these ministers foUowing: Messra Andrew MelvUl, James MelviU, WiUiam Scot, James Eosse, John Carmichael, John GUlespie, WiUiam Erskine, Collin CampbeU, James Mure- head, John Davidson, John MitcheU, John Coldan, John Aber- nethie, James Davidson, Adam Banantyne, John Eow, William Buchanan, John Kennedie, John OgUvie, John Scrimgeor, John Malcolme, James Burden, J. Bleckfurd, James Strauchan, James Eow, William Eow, Eobert Mercer, Edmond Myles, John French, Patrick Sympson, John Dykes, William Young, William Couper, WUliam Keith, Henry Duncan, James Mercer, Eobert ColvUl, William Hogg, Eobert Wallace, John Weems, David Barclay, WUliam Cranstoun ; Mr David Calderwood, and some others, who coming to Perth afterward, subscribed likewise. Of these who subscribed three turned afterward Bishops : Mr John Abernethie, Mr Adam Banantyne, and Mr William Couper. La this protesta tion they desyred the Estates to remember, if they should autho rise the preheminence of Bishops above their brethren, they wold bring into the Kirk of God the ordinance of man ; and, that which experience in aU preceeding ages hath testyfyed to have been the ground of great idlenesse, grosse ignorance, unsufferable pryde, pitilesse tyranny, shamelesse ambition, and of that antichristian Hierarchie, which cUmbed up upon the steps of the prehemencie of bishops, untiU that Man of Sin come forth as the rype fruits of the wisdome of man. They desyre them to beware to strive against God with a displayed banner, by buUding up again the waUs of Jericho, which the Lord has not only demohshed, but also laid under an horrible execration and interdiction ; to remember their oath and subscription, the slander of the gospeU, defamation of 160 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION many preachers, offence of the people, hearing preachers accepted in their owne persons, the dignity, pomp, and superiority, which before they damned openly in others. They affirme, that if these few aspiring preachers go forward in their defection, not only ap propriating to themselves aUanerly, but also taking upon them such offices as carry with them the ordinary charge of governing the civill affairs of the countrey, and finally seek to subprdinat their brethren to their jurisdiction, they are more worthy, as rot ten members, to be cutt off from the body of Christ, than to have superiority and dominion over their brethren. They offer to prove that this Bishoprick, which is sought to be erected, is repugnant to the Word of God, the ancient canons and fathers of the Kirk, the tenets of the modern most godly and learned Divines, the doctrine and constitution of our Kirk, the lawes of the Eeahne, prejudiciaU to the weeU and honor of the King and the realme, especiaUy of the Nobility, and to the weeU of the Kirk. La end, they protest, in name of the Kirk in generaU, and of their Presbytries in particular, and in their owne names, against the said bishoprick and bishops, and the erection, confirmation, or ratification of their Estate at this present Parhament ; most humbly craving, that their protestation, in substance and forme as it was sett down, might be admitted by their Honors, as registrat among their statutes and acts, in case these Bishopricks be aUowed, erected, ratified, or confirmed. Mr James MelviU had in readinesse the verification of the points which they offered to prove in the Protestation, which are already extant in print in the " Course of Conformity," and the substance sett down before in the Eeasons against ministers vote in Parha ment. Only this is to be observed, that, in proving their Estate to be prejudiciaU to the honor and weeU of the noblemen and estates of the realme, he sayeth, " Set me up these bishops, once caUed long since, the ' Prince's led horse,' nothing, howsoever unlawfuU and pernicious to the Kirk or the realme, if it shaU be borne forth by the countenance, authority, care and endeavour of a King, it shall be carryed through by his Bishops in Parliament, sett up and entertained by him for that effect, and the rest of the Estates shall OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 161 serve like cyphers. They have their Lordships, livings, honor and estimation, profit and commodity from the King, as other Estates have not. The King may sett them up and cast them down, give them and take from them, put them in and out at his pleasure ; therefore, they must be at his direction, to do what liketh him. He may deaU with them without law, because they are sett up against law : he cannot deaU so with other Estates ; for they have either heritable standing in their roomes, by the fundamentaU Ewes, or a commission only from the Estate that sent them, as from burgesses or barrons. Deprave once the EcclesiasticaU Estate, which hath the gift of knowledge and learning beyond others, and is supposed to be of best conscience, because so it should be, the rest wUl easUy be miscarryed ; and that so much the more, that the Officers of Estate, the Lords of Session, and other judges that have their offices from the King, are commonly framed after. the Court affection, others for commodities and advancement may easily be corrupted, and so nothing shaU passe in Farhament with out the Bishops and that faction. Yea, let the ChanceUor, Secre- tarie, Treasurer, President, ComptroUer, and other officers, take heed that these new Prelates, as covetous and ambitious as ever were those of old, insinuating themselves by flatteries and obsequi- ousnesse in the Prince's favour, attaine not to the bearing of aU these offices, and exerceing of the same, as craftUy, avariciously, arrogantly and cruelly, as ever the PapisticaU Prelates did." As for the weeU of the subjects, he foreteUeth, that aU true reUgion, or the fruitful! use of it for the feeding of souls, wiU decay. If there arise a Popish or prophane Prince they must alter with him, please and obey him, or losse' their places, honors, riches and pleasures ; which they wUl not do, because they have already given their consciences, honesty, truth and credit before man, as a price for these things of the world. E true reUgion stand, what care wiU they have, notwithstanding, of feeding of souls, that have sold their owne for the world ? AU their care and travell must be to keep Court, to acquyre more plenty of goods, honor and plea sure. Inferior ministers, for the most part, wiU foUow their L 162 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION fashions, whereupon shaU foUow atheisme, licentiousnesse and prophanity among the people. DiscipUne being put in their hands, they wiU make merchandise of it in favours of this or that nobleman, of this or that courtier ; for such use to be men-pleasers, and darr not displease others by the execution of discipline, lest it should strike against themselves, commonly more guilty and slanderous than any other. E any succeeding Prince please to play the tyrant, and govern not by his Ewes, but by his wul and pleasure, signifyed by missives, articles, and directions, they wiU never admonish him as faithftdl pastors wold do, (for such they are not, have not lawfuU calling, nor authority from God and his Kirk) ; but as they are made up by man, they wiU flatter and please man. As they stand by the Prince's affection, so they wUl by no means jeopard their standing, but wiU be the readiest men to put his wUl and pleasure in execution ; suppose it were to apprehend his best subjects, namely, such as stand for the lawes and liberties of the realme, and to cast them into dark and stinking prisons, or to banish them from their native countrey. Unlesse men of what soever degree cappe and kneeU to them, and give them their am bitious stUes and places, suppose against their hearts, they shah not misse to be crossed by them in their affairs, and to be traduced at Court by them or by their means. The Bishop in his owne city and among his vassaUs, wUl think himselfe a pettie Eoy. E any under him, refuse to serve him with whatsoever they have, means shaU be found to piU and poU him. If the Prince be prodigaU, or wold inrich his courtiers by taxations, impositions, subsidies and exactions, laid upon the subjects, who shall be so ready to impose them in Parhament or Convention, as those who are made and sett up for the like service ? The Lords of the Articles rejected, likewise, the Protestation. It was therefore thought meet, that a coppie should be presented to every Estate as they satt severaUy, and to some speciaU noble men. Much was promised by the Commissioners of burghs and barrons when they were conveened apart ; but the most part were won either one way or other to the King's purpose. There rested OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 163 only a protestation to be made in open ParUament. The last and most solemne day, he [Andrew MelviU] got entry with great diffi culty into the ParUament House. How soon he was espyed to rise, of purpose to speak, one was sent to him to charge him to depart, which, notwithstanding, he did not until he had made his mind knowne. A paction was made betwixt the Lords which had the Kirk rents and the Bishops, That the Bishop should consent to the erec tion of a number of other prelacies in temporaU Lordships, and the Lords of Erection shah consent to the confirmation of the Bishops new gifts, to their restoration to the old rents, Uvings, privUedges, which their predecessors had in time of Poperie. When ministers vote in ParUament was agreed upon in the GeneraU As- sembUe, it was agreed, also, that there should be fifty-one voters. Now, by the erection of these Prelacies the Kirk was defrauded of so many voters, whereas they pretended great zeaU for ministers vote in ParUament, to vindicate the ministry from contempt and poverty. I confesse they had an intention even then to procure a revocation, whereof they have given since evident prooff. Such was their treachery both against God and man. The first day of the Parhament ten Bishops rode betwixt the Earles and Lords, of which number was Mr Peter EoUock, Bishop of Dunkelden, as having place in Parliament, in respect of his bene fice only, for he was never a minister ; but the last day they went on foot to the Parhament House, because they got not the place nixt the Marquesses. The first act of this Parliament, which concerned the King's supremacie, was keept a long tyme so closse, that the Clerk durst not let any have the extract of it. The second concerned the re stitution of the Estate of Bishops, as the reader may see it at length in the Acts of ParUaments. In the third, It was ordained that no Bishop may sett in few, tacks, or otherwayes, or dispone any part of the patrimonie of their bishopricks, without the advice, consent and assent of their Chapters, or the greatest number of them duely procured and obtained ; and that the said Chapters remaine now, l2 164 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION and in aU tyme coming, according to the foundation of the said bishopricks, and as it hath been in tymes bypast, without any kind of alteration ; except in the Chapter of St Andrews, &c. Chap ters were damned by the Kirk of ScotEnd as weU as Bishops, yet the Estates in this Parliament ratified both, without so much as ad vising with the Kirk, or GeneraU Assembly of the Kirk. The GeneraU Assembly [was] wont to be holden usuaUy immediately befor, or in tyme of Parliament, but now none must be holden for fear of opposition. Equity craved that their Estate should not be erected, tUl all parties having interest, or that might have been prejudged by that erection, were summoned to have heard their erection. It is weU known the Kirk of ScotEnd was much pre judged by erecting them in manner and forme, and with the pri- vUeges sett downe in their provision. At this Parhament, the Earles and Lords were cloathed in scar let. It is constantly reported, that a Popish Bishop, at the break ing up of the Eeformation, said, That a red Parhament in St John stoun should mend aU again. And indeed defection has ever grown since that tyme. At this Parhament was granted a taxation of four hundred thousand merks. THE SECOND STEPP OR DEGREE : THE CONSTANT MODERATION OP SYNODS AND PRESBYTERIES. The reader may perceave, by the proceedings of the last Parha ment, wherefor the King and the Commissioners of the Generall Assembly, would have had the GeneraU Assembly continued tiU after this ParUament. The ministery was made to beleeve that they were to have a GeneraU Assembly in this instant month of July ; but at the rising of the Parliament, it is prorogat, by procla mation, untiU May 1607. Some show of Assembly they must have, for colour of the Kirk's consent to constitut the Bishops constant Moderators of Presbyteries and Synods. They durst not venture upon a free GeneraU Assembly. Therfor a mean was devised, for drawing some men of chief note out of the way, that they might the more easily attaine to their intent. In the month of May, there OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 165 was sent from Court eight missives, directed to eight ministers, Messrs Andrew MelvUl, James MelvUl, James Balfour, WUliam Scott, John Carmichael, Eobert WaUace, Adam Colt, WUliam Watson. They are willed and commanded, aU excuses sett aside, to repair toward Court before the 15th day of September, to the end the King might treat with them, and such others of the breth ren as he commanded to be there at that same tyme, in matters concerning the peace of the Church ; seeing he was frustrat of his traveUs to that end before, by the contempt of his authority in some, and presumption in others in presuming to justify their ab solute proceedings, and withaU, to slander his just commandments and the lawfuU proceedings of his CounseU ; and likewise by the late answers of the Synods, aU tending to delay, without any as surance of performing, at the nixt GeneraU Assembly, that which had been so earnestly urged. After incaUing on the name of God, they advised, whether they should obey the King's letter or not. Finding no appearance of good, they used meanes for hberty to stay at home. But the Earle of Dumbarr assured them, there was no remedie ; for the nixt warning wold be a charge, to their greater pains, and lesse advantage to their cause, the chief men standing in defence of it being blotted with contempt and disobedience. They were also borne in hand, that this was devised by some who wold have matters to proceed better, and without the Bishops' and Com missioners' knowledge. Therefor, as they loved the weeU of the Kirk in generaU, and of their imprisoned brethren in particular, they wold desire to do as they were directed by the letter. The Earle of Dumbarr made Mr James MelvUl believe that he was the procurer of those missives, for a speciaU benefit both to the Kirk and them ; that the Bishops understood not, tiU of late ; that they had traveUed to stay it but in vain : therefor willed- them to be of good courage, to make no excuse ; assuring them, by God's grace, he should make it the best voyage that ever they made. They resolve first, to attend on the Parliament to do some piece of service to the Kirk of God, which they did, as ye have heard, and thereafter to prepare themselves for their journey. 166 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION In the month of August, the eight ministers sent for to come to Court, advised with their Presbytries and Sessions how to carry themselves. Their Presbytries and Sessions would give them no commission, in caise they had been urged to a disputa tion ; but advysed them to deUver their opinion in matters pro poned to them. Three of their number, being members of the Presbytrie of St Andrews, craved from their Presbytrie an extract of the acts made and subscribed heretofor in the Presbytrie, anent the Discipline of the Kirk ; especiaUy the act concluded by the Presbyterie, upon the 2d of August 1604, concerning the sub scription of the whole brethren of the Presbytry to the Confession of Faith ; which was granted. Li subscribing of this act they ap prove the Confession of Faith, and the Act of ParUament, holden anno 1592, for explanation of the present Discipline authorized in the said Confession; promised solemnly to defend the same, and never to come in the contrary, according to the great oath sett downe in the Confession of Faith. Mr George Glaidstones sub scribed this act with the rest. Another act was granted them, made the 10th of January 1605, bearing Mr George Glaidstones" excuse for his journey to Court, without advertising the brethren, and his declaration, in presence of the whole brethren, that as he departed a brother, so he returned, without usurping any autho rity, and promised to behave himself in as great humility as be fore. But there was no truth nor trust to be given him. He had changed four flocks, and sworn that he should never be Bishop of St Andrews, because the Bishops of that See were so unhappy in their end, and much hated ; yet, even at that same tyme, he re turned Bishop of St Andrews. When some gentlemen, and others, his famihars, who expected some benefit by his advancement, asked how he could bear with the Presbyterie, he answered, " Hold your toungue, we shaU steaU them off their feet." After the eight ministers had taken journey, Mr George Glad stones informed his Presbyterie, that his Majesty had sent for him, and asked wherein the brethren would employ him. They charged him, as he wold answer to God, that he wold neither, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 167 directly nor indirectly, do any thing in prejudice of the estabUshed DiscipUne ; which he promised solemnly in presence of the breth ren : and farther, that he should do nothing but that for which he should be welcome to them at his return, and for which he should not be ashamed to be spoken of, either now or hereafter, by the posterity ; taking God to witnesse that he never minded the alteration of the discipline of the Kirk. But the contrary ap peared in short tyme after. Upon the 20th September 1606, the eight ministers got pre sence at Hampton Court. Upon the 22d of September they were caUed before the King. The King came to the Chamber of Pre sence, accompanied with the Earles of Dumbarr and Orknay, Lord Fleming, the Laird of Lawrestoun, SE Thomas HamUtoun, the King's Advocat, Mr John Spotswood, Mr George Gladstones, Mr James Law, Mr James Nicolson, Mr Eobert Howie, Mr Patrick Sharp, Mr Andrew Lamb. The King declared what causes moved him to write for them. In end, he gathered aU his speeches to two heads, wherein he said he would be through with them for the peace of the Kirk : the one concerning the pretended Gene raU Assembly, (so he termed it,) holden at Aberdeen, and the pro ceeding which foUowed therupon ; the other, how there might be an ordinary and peaceable Assembly holden, to sett aU things at quyetnesse and good order. They had agreed before, among themselves, to give no present answer. Therefore, Mr James Mel vUl, who was appointed to be their speechman, after he had ex pressed, in a complementing manner, their joy for his inclination to entertainie peace, &c, desyred tyme to advise, because his Majestie's missive sent to them did bear no particular, neither heard they of any before that tyme. After some tyme had been spent upon sending of Commissioners from Presbyteries to Aber deen, after the receaving of Lawrestoun's letter ; the praying for the convicted brethren ; proceedings of the Synod of Fife ; and Mr James MelviU's letter directed to that Synod against the five articles ; the Kuig resumed the first two heads, and wiUed them to advise upon an answer against the nixt day. 168 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION The day foUowing, that is the 23d of September, they compear ed again. The Prince stood at the King's left hand with the above-named Scottish noblemen, CounseUours, Bishops, Commis sioners of the GeneraU Assembly, so many as were present. Can- terberrie stood at the King's right hand, Sahsberry, Suffolk, Wor cester, Nottinghame, Northamptoun, Lord Stennop, Lord KnoUes, and sundry other noblemen. Some Bishops and Deanes stood be hind the tapestrie, who now and then discovered themselves. The King, after resuming of the points proponed the day pre ceeding, desired, at last, to be resolved, in particular, Whether the Assembly holden last at Aberdeen was a lawfuU Assembly ? and whether the proceedings of the ministers at it, and afterward, were justifiable or not ? The Bishops and Commissioners who were pre sent, were first asked, and answered, That they damned aU their proceedings. Then the King enquyred at Mr Andrew Melvill, What he could say for that Assembly, seeing the number was so tew, and they wanted the Moderator and Scribe, and were dis charged before, by open proclamation. He answered shortly, as we have afready sett downe in the answers of the imprisoned before. Then the King asked, What reason he had not to con- demne their proceedings. He answered, " First, I am but a pri vate man, come upon your Majestie's missive, without any Com mission from the Church of Scotland ; and therefore, seeing nemo constituit me judicem, I cannot take upon me to condenme them. Second, Your Majesty, by virtue of your proclamation, dated here at Hampton Court, (which he produceth,) hath remit ted their tryaU to the GeneraU Assembly, expecting reparation of wrongs, if any be done. I therefore cannot prejudge the Church and Assembly of my vote there ; which, if I give now, I shaU be sure to have my mouth shut up then, as, by experience, I and other brethren have found before. Third, Res non erat integra, sed Jiac- tenus judicata, by your Majesty's CounseU ; whether rightly or not, that I remitt to God before whom one day they must appear, and answer for that sentence. I think your Majesty wiU not be content that I should now contradict your Counsell, and their proceedings. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 169 Fourth, How can I condemn my brethren indicta causa, not hear ing their accusers objecting against them, and themselves answer ing ?" This was the substance of his answer, which he uttered after his owne manner, roundly and freely. The rest answered the like in effect. Their harmony moved the Liglish and others who were present very much. When Mr James MelvUl was giving his an swer, [he] said farther, " If in the meantyme your Majesty wiU urge me to deUver my judgment of the matter, according to my conscience, unlesse the wrongs done to them, and given in writ to your Majesty's Estates at the last ParUament holden at Perth, be considered and discussed, I wold not for aU the world condemne them. A coppie of the wrongs we are earnestly desired by them selves to deUver to your Majesty." With this he stepped forward and deUvered them to the King in his own hand. The substance of their informations to the last ParUament we have already sett downe in the defences of their proceedings. After they had given their answers, Mr Andrew MelviU broke out in his own manner, and plainly avouched the innocency of the brethren, recounted the wrongs done to them at Linlithgow, and laid to the Advocate his charge, craftie and malicious dealhng against them, so that xurrsyogos ruv a,hik to be visitor in his place. And whatsoever minister, without just cause and lawfuU excuse made, shaU absent himselfe from the Visi tation, or the Diocesian Assembly, he shaU be suspended from his office and benefice, and, if he amend not, shaU be deprived. " Item, Exercise of doctrine is to be continued weekly among the ministers, at the tymes of their accustomed meetings, and to be moderated by the Bishop, if he be present, or then, by any other whom he shaU appoint at the tyme of the Synod. " Item, That the Bishops shaU be subject in aU things concerning their hfe, conversation, office and benefice, to the censure of the GeneraU Assembly ; and, being found culpable, with his Majestie's ' advice and consent, to be deprived. " Item, That no Bishop be elected, but who is past the age of forty years compleat, and who hath at the least been an actual and teaching minister by the space of ten years. " Which whole articles being diverse tymes pubhckly read in the face of the whole Assembly conveened, after voteing, the same were ratified, approved, and concluded by the whole Assembly, and ordained to be observed in aU tyme coming. " Sess. 5. Forsameikle as in this present Assembly, it is afready statute, that the exercises shaU be moderate by the Bishops in the meeting of the ministry, if they be present, or then, by any other whom the Bishop shaU appoint at the tyme of the Synod ; and be- ' cause the nixt Synod is not to be holden before the moneth of Octo ber nixt to come, therefore it is ordained, that, in absence of the Bishops, the constant Moderators shall remaine in their own places, tiU the nixt Synod be holden in October nixt to come." There were but fyve of the whole number disassented. Seven , answered non liquet. The rest consented to these conclusions, whose names deserve to be registrat in a larger History to their eternah infamie. * In these Articles they acknowledged, that the necessity of the p2 228 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Kirk craved there should be yearly GeneraU Assembhes, yea, the Bishops assured the ministers there conveened, that the King wold grant them the hberty of the GeneraU Assemblies every year. And in that they were made liable to the censures of the GeneraU Assemblies, it appeareth that the power granted in these articles above written falleth, in case we have not ordinar and sett Gene raU AssembUes to censure them ; for it were foohshnesse to make them Uable to the censures of GeneraU AssembUes, if it were un certain whether they might have AssembUes or not. The Bishops then are but usurpers in whatsomever they claim by virtue of these articles ; and ministers are but slaves in acknowledging them for respect to these articles, suppose that Assembly holden had been nuU of itself; for it is weU known we have no ordinary Gene raU AssembUes to censure them. Howbeit they were made liable to the censure of the GeneraU AssembUes, yet the ministers there ' assembled are not to be excused; for what hope could there be of bearing downe their tyrannny in the GeneraU AssembUes, if Pres byteries and Synods be made obnoxious to them ; for if the Pres- 1 byteries and Synods be subdued or corrupted by them, the Assem bly, consisting of Commissioners from Presbyteries or Synods, must be subdued and corrupted also. Where they acknowledge the indiction of the Assembly to appertaine to the King, by the prerogative of his royaU Crowne, (if that clause be not foisted in without their knowledge), they have betrayed one of the chief liberties which Christ hath granted to the Kirk, and was ratified by the lawes of the countrey. It appeareth that the Bishops Visitation and the holding of the < Diocesian Synod are either taken as equivalent and to import that i the holding of the Diocesian Synod is nothing else but a visitation ^ of the ministers at the Diocesian Synod, which visitation, Sylvester in his Summa caUeth the imperfect or not full visitation, distin guishing it from the fuU visitation, when the Bishop visiteth the particular kirks of the diocie. If they were not taken for one thing, the Bishop might not depute another to moderate the Dio cesian Synod, as by these articles he may depute another rmnister ' OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 229 to visit his diocie. If it be not an EpiscopaU visitation, why is the pretended Bishop suffered to substitute a vicegerent, seeing that part of the act, which toucheth the moderation of Diocesian Synods, giveth him no power to substitute any but that which a simple Moderator should do ? Chooseth not the Bishop his own clerk, without consent of the Synod ? continueth the dyet at his own pleasure ? summoneth persons to compear in his owne name, and not in name of the Synod ? suffereth nothing to come in vot ing but what he pleaseth, or names to be called for giving of votes, but when he pleaseth? numbereth and pondereth them as he pleaseth? and when he hath ventured a matter upon voting, he wiU not stand upon plurahty of voices ? When they have pyped, he wiU dance as he pleaseth, as Mr James Law, Bishop of Glasgow, said once at a Diocesian Synod. In one of the Articles, it is ordained, That whatsoever minister, without just cause, shaU absent himself from the Visitation or the Diocesian Assembly, shall be suspended from bis office and bene fice, and, if he amend not, shaU be deprived ; where ye see, they are joined togither, Visitation and the Diocesian Synod ; and no mention is made of visitation in any other article but in this, where the Diocesian Assembly is joined with it. How then can minis ters cover their repairing to Diocesian Synods, and bear the world in hand that there is no difference betwixt the ProvinciaU Synods we had, and the Diocesian Synods we have now, but only that the Bishop is constant Moderator ? EpiscopaU Visitation and a Pro vinciaU Synod or CounseU cannot consist togither in one meeting, and proceed after one manner and forme. If it be a visitation, the Bishop is only judge, and the ministers there conveened sub ject themselves to his visitation. J£ it were merely a CounseU, then the Bishop were only President or Moderator ; but when mi nisters shaU oppose to the Bishop's substituting whom he pleaseth to moderate, citeing in his owne name and using a negative power, &c, then shaU we say, they stand to the nature of a Synod? Farther, Is there no more requyred but to stand to the nature of a Synod? Ought they not to stand to the freedome which the 230 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Synods [were] wont to have ? The perpetuity of moderation in the persons of the pretended Bishops beareth downe free reason ing and voting; and because, by a divided consideration, the Bishop is to be considered out of the Synod as a High Commis sioner or Visitor to suspend, deprive, waird, fyne any of them, give coUation of benefices, &c. The repairing to Diocesian Synods possesses them in the chief place of the Kirk, and instaUeth them, as it were, in their EpiscopaU thrones, which, if it were forborne, the world wold see more clearly aU their usurpation otherwayes. The pretended Bishops have no power granted by these Articles to intend or reduce processe against any offender, but only to re^ vise the processe. How can they then aUedge, that Presbyteries stand only precario and by toUerance? for where shah the pro cesse against any offender be intended or reduced, if not in the Presbyterie ? E the King should be advertised by the GeneraU Assembly that . another may be placed in the roome of the Bishop, staymg the pronouncing of the sentence of Excommunication, the processe being lawfully deduced, doth it not presuppose that there must be ane ordinary sett tyme for the GeneraU Assembly which should try and complaine ? doth it not foUow, seeing we have not such ordinary Assembhes, that the Presbyteries may use their wonted Uberty to the sentence of excommunication or absolution, howbeit the Bishop's approbation cannot be had ? CoUation of benefices was not taken from Presbyteries by this act, but afterward by the ParUament. What if the Bishop judge him not quahfyed whom the Presby terie hath found qualifyed for the ministry ? ShaU the judgment of one cross the judgment of many ? But let this passe as absurd. Why do not Presbyteries oppose to the entry of ministers admit ted without tryaU ? for by " the ministers of the bounds," who should try the person to be admitted, was meaned " the Presby terie :" that pretended Assembly forbearing the word " Presby terie," only because it was offensive to the King, as was aUedged, and useing a description in place of it. And sicklike, why do they OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 231 acknowledge any for a deposed minister, not deposed with consent of the ministerie of the bounds where he serveth ? May not Pres byteries proceed to admission by themselves, or deposition, if the Bishop take any other course than is approved by the acts of this pretended Assembly, or seeing there is no ordinary GeneraU AssembUes ? It seemeth, that in the article concerning the Oath to be taken at the tyme of the admission, that these words, " and to his Ordi nar," seeing: it is not declared before, who is the Ordinar ; nor the forme of the oath is not sett downe ; and it is insert betwixt that part of the act, which concerneth swearing obedience to his Majesty, and the forme of that Oath. Li the article of the exercise of doctrine, the exercise of disci phne, for any thing that is found in that article, may be moderat by a Moderator chosen by the Presbyterie. E the Bishops shaU be subject in aU things concerning their life, conversation, office and benefice, to the censure of the GeneraU Assembly, then it is evident, that in the former articles nothing was granted, but upon assurance of sett and frequent Assemblies. Therefore, this failling, it foUoweth, that not only they have ipso facto forfaulted aU the power granted to them in the former ar ticles, but also that they remained stiU subject to the censures of the Presbyteries and Synods, conforme to the Caveats sett downe in former Assembhes, for keeping them from corruption ; and that the Bishops usurpation wiU be no excuse to ministers deserting the cause of God, and aU men wiU think them unworthie of their place, quyting the Uberties of the Kirk. But considering the nature of this Assembly, and the reasons above mentioned for the nullity of it, they ought not to have acknowledged it at aU. GeneraU AssembUes may choose their own Moderator, notwith standing of any thing that is said in this Act of this Assembly, howsoever the pretended Archbishop usurpeth the place. Some faithfuU and zealous ministers condemned in their sermons pubhckly, and laid to the charge of the Bishops perjurie and defec tion. Upon this occasion foUowed a terrible proclamation for ratifi- 232 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION cation of the acts of that Assembly. An iU turne hath need to be weell backed. When God's glory and the weeU of the Kirk was chiefly regarded in Assembhes, there was no need of such pro clamations to force ministers to obedience, or to suppresse oblo- quie. Mr George Gladstones, Bishop of St Andrews, held a Diocesian Synod in St Andrews, in October nixt foUowing [1610] after this Assembly. He sent before his missive to particular mmisters, re questing them to concurr to such things as are competent to that judicatorie for their interest, and to abyde such tryaU as shaU be thought fittest ; and, withaU, intimateth, that suspension from the ministerie is the penaltie of vrilfuU absence for the first time. He sat with his green velvet cusheon before him, and Mr John Mitch- elson, Clerk, on a stooU besyde him. When he craved a Privie Conference, Mr John Malcolme, Mr WiUiam Erskine, Mr John Kinneir, Mr David Mearns, and Mr David Spence, made some opposition, and would understand by what authority the order established in our Kirk, by so many famous AssembUes, was alter ed, and upon what warrant he was Moderator ?- When he aUedged the act of Glasgow, and it was read, the brethren were much moved. Mr David Spence said, " If I had the value of fourtie shillings to plead for before a judge, wUl I make that man procu rator for me, whom I know perfectly wiU give my fourtie shillings to my partie ? We know that these men who were nominate, for the most part, to that Assembly, were of a contrary mynd and intention, and, therefore, we wold give them no commission from our Presbyterie." Mr WUliam Couper, an unconstant man, and then gapeing for a bishoprick, so minced the matter, as if nothing had been concluded but things indifferent. The Bishop partly threatened, if any repyned at the acts of that Assembly he should be deposed, and farther punished according to his Majestie's plea sure, partly with flattery, promising that nothing should be done but with consent of the whole. There was no farther opposition. When the Conference conveened, the Bishop sent for Mr Eobert Howie, aUedging that doctors should be joined with pastors in OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 233 case any doubt occurred ; howbeit, Mr Andrew MelvUl was de barred before by an act made by the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembly, for fear to be crossed in their courses. When it came to the tryaU of the brethren, a whole Presbyterie was not removed, as was the custom before, but five or six brethren. He asked at ten or twelve, and then in generaU, if any had ought to object. Thereafter he caused the beddall cry at the kirk door, E there were any man ready to object against the ministers of A, B, C, their life and ministry. So sundry signes of EpiscopaU Visitation, rather than of a ProvinciaU Counsell or Synod, appeared to any that were judicious. Upon the Sabbath-day after, while he was reposeing himselfe upon his bed, in tyme of the afternoon's sermon, his sister's son kUled his cook with a throw of his dagger, just under the left pape. He was wakened out of his sleep, and the people in the kirk were raised with a cry of blood and murther. He was to hold his Diocesian Synod of Lothian in Hadding- toun the 1st of November. He requyred the ministers to be pre sent, accompanied with two or three Commissioners from every paroch, and threatened the absents with suspension. Here, again, ye see the signs of EpiscopaU Visitation. The Presbytery of Haddingtoun thought it meet to declyne him, and resolved upon a supplication, to move him not to urge them with any other dis cipline or government of the Kirk than they had sworn to and subscribed at the King's command, and command of the GeneraU Assembly, and practised so many years. Mr James CarmichaeU was ordained to present it, and, in case it were not receaved, to utter the substance of it be word. The rest promised to assist. But when the Bishop asked their voices at the choosing of the Clerk ; wherein he condescended to them to please them, Mr James dis charged not his part. Whereupon other brethren of the Presbyterie were moved to oppose to his sitting. Mr John Kerr began ; then Mr James foUowed with a tedious and unprofitable harangue ; but Mr Andrew M'Ghie assisted him. Mr Archibald OswaU fol lowed ; but aU were referred to a Privie Conference. The three brethren found no assistance as was promised, both by their owne 234 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION brethren and the Presbyterie of Dalkeith. But, afternoon, the rest of the brethren accompanied them to the Privie Conference ; but they receaved no satisfaction from the Bishop. Yet none of the Presbyterie was caUed upon that night in any matter that was treated, except Mr James CarmichaeU, who did sit, vote and reason. The Bishop was loath to meddle with them, tUl he was forced, the day foUowing, in a matter concerning the pEntation of North Berwick ; but some went out before they were caUed upon. The rest of that Presbyterie wold not vote in that place. What opposition was made in other Synods I have not enquyr- ed ; but this, in generaU, I know, that, however there was great murmuring, there was weak resisting ; ministers were become so faint-hearted, and carelesse of the Uberties of Christ's kingdome ; every man careing for himselfe, without regard to his oath and subscription : for they were bound to mantain the estabUshed discipline to their uttermost power, and, therefore, guUtie of per- jurie as weU as the pretended Bishops. Mr John Spotswood, Bishop of Glasgow, Mr Andrew Lamb, Bishop of Brechin, and Mr Gavin HamUton, Bishop of GaUo way, were consecrate bishops at London in the month of November 1610, by Abbots, Bishop of London. There was no mention made in the Assembly, holden at Glasgow, of the consecration of Bishops; for, howbeit that perfidious pack tyed Presbyteries and Synods to them, in the points and with the Umitations expressed, yet meant they not to determine that there was a distinct office of a Bishop in the Word of God different from the office of a minister ; yea, the contrary was determined before in our GeneraU Assem blies : And, therefore, they intended not consecration ; for by the Bishop [of] the diocie is not meant in the Act of Glasgow a Bishop by office, but only a simple minister, so styled in regard of the great benefice of the bishoprick, as he was so styled in the two preceeding Assembhes. That some ministers, by divine or aposto- lick institution, ought to have power over other ministers and their flocks, or to be proper pastors of aU the congregations of the diocie, as they arrogate to themselves ; — or that ordination of Pres- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 235 byters was tyed to them by divine right, and aU jurisdiction in particular kirks did flow from them, — was not the meaning of that Assembly. The power granted to them was only a power com mitted to them by that Convention, as in former tymes to Com missioners of provinces ; which another Assembly may denude them off, without degradation or execration as they caU it. Their consecration, then, is of no force, and ought not to be acknowledg ed. And if consecration had been intended, yet ought they not to have receaved it from a forreigner without consent of that Con vention, but should have contented themselves with that forme which was used in the year 1572. In the month of December these three returned to Scotland, and consecrated Mr George Gladstones, Archbishop of St An drews. The rest were consecrate upon the 13th of January fol lowing, [1611]. The Earle of Dumbarr, a chief instrument imployed for the over throw of the discipline of our Kirk at Linhthgow and Glasgow, departed this hfe, at Whitehall, upon the penult of January. Mr Andrew MelviU, when he heard what was concluded at Glasgow, after sUence for a space, broke forth in these words : " That man (meaning Dumbar) that hath overthrowne that Kirk and the liber ties of Christ's kmgdom there, shaU never have the grace to sett his foot in that kingdom again." Huntly and ErroU were sett at Uberty not long after the Assem bly was past. So it appeared they were committed only to gull that Assembly, as if Bishops were zealous and forward against Papists. Mr John Stratoun, minister of Forresse, in the North, was cited to compear before Bishop Gladstones, and some of the King's Coun seU, for doctrine dehvered by him at an exercise against the Estate of Bishops, (the Bishop of Murray being present), and was wairded in the castle of Invernesse. By this letter following, written by Mr George Gladstones, pre tended Bishop of St Andrews, and dated the last of August 1612, the Eeader may perceave what preparation was made for the ratifi- 236 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION cation of the acts of Glasgow at the nixt ParUament, to the pre judice of a free Parhament : — " MOST GRACIOUS SOVERAIGNE, "As it hath pleased your Majestie to direct me and my Lord, your Majestie's Secretary, for advising anent our affairs to be handled in this approaching Parhament, so happUy did I find him and my Lord of Glasgow both in this towne, and conveened them both immediately after my arriving ; and with good advisment we have made choise of these things which are most necessary, and have omitted these articles which may seeme to carry envy or sus picion, or which your Majesty, by your royaU authority, might performe by yourselfe. But we aU hold fast this conclusion, That it is most necessary and convenient, both for your Majestie's ser vice and weeU of the Church, that the day, viz., the 12th of Oc tober, shall hold precisely, to the which the Parhament was pro clamed upon the 24th of this instant. I wiU assure your Majesty, that the very evUl wUl that is carryed to my Lord ChanceUor * by the Nobility and people is like to make us great store of friendship ; for they know him to be our professed enemy, and he dissembleth it not. I thank God, that it pleased your Majestie to make choice of my Lord Secretary to be our formahst and adviser of our acts. For we find him wise, fast, and secret. We wiU not be idle in the meantyme to prepare such as have votte to enclyne to the right way. All men do foUow us, and hunt for our favour, upon the re port of your Majestie's good acceptance of me and the Bishop of Caithnesse, and sending for my Lord of Glasgow, and the procure ment of this Parliament without advice of the ChanceUor. And if your Majestie wiU continue these shineing beames and shews of your Majestie's favour, doubtlesse, the very purpose that seemeth most difficult wiU facUitat, to your Majestie's great honor, and our credit, which, if it were greater than it is, your Majesty wold re ceave no interest ; for besydes that, no estate may say that they * Alexander Seton, Earl of Dunfermline, was Lord High Chancellor from the year 1605 till his death in 1622. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 237 are your Majestie's creatures as we may say, for there is none whose standing is so slipperie, when your Majesty shaU frown, as we ; for at your Majestie's nodd we must either stand or faU. But we referr the more ample declaration of these purposes and other points of your Majestie's service, to the sufficiencie of my Lord Glasgow, and my good Lord Secretarie,* the fourteenth Bishop of this kingdome. But my Lord of Glasgow and I are contending to which of the two provinces he shaU appertaine. Your Majestie, who is our great Archbishop, must decyde it. Thus, after my most humble and hearty thanks for your Majestie's good acceptance, and gracious dispatch lately, which hath filled the ears of aU this kingdome, I beseech God to heap upon your Majesty the plenty of all spirituaU and temporaU blessings for ever. I rest. " Your Majestie's most humble subject and servitor, " St Andrews." Edinburgh, last of August 1612. At the ParUament holden in October 1612, the act of the pre tended Assembly at Glasgow was ratified, or rather perverted, under colour of explanation by additions, omissions and alterations : so that in effect it was a new act different from the Act of Glas gow, as may appear by coUation. But this is not the first tyme the Parhament hath wronged our Kirk by their acts. The Bishops consented to these omissions and additions, without advise and consent of the GeneraU Assembly, whereunto they were tyed by the Caveats, and, therefore, bewrayed not only their perfidie, but also their insatiable desyre of absolute jurisdiction and exemption from aU censures ; for they canceUed such clauses as made them lyable to the censure of the GeneraU Assembly, or tyed them to the Presbyteries in the deposition of ministers and their tryaU be- * Sir Thomas Hamilton, afterwards Earl of Haddington, and Lord President of the Court of Session, was appointed Clerk Register in 1612, but previously to July that year he exchanged the office with Sir Alexander Hay of Newton, when he became Secretary for Scotland. 238 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION fore admission. The omissions, additions, and alterations of the act the reader shaU find after, in the Grievances presented by the ministers, anno 1633. Mr WUliam Cowper succeeded in the Bishoprick of GaUoway to Mr Gavin Hamilton in the year foUowing [1613], but made his re sidence in the Cannongate, that he might be near the ChappeU EoyaU, where he preached as Dean, neglecting his diocie, where he ought to have preached as Bishop, if the office of a Diocesian Bishop had been lawfuU. None was more forward in the purer tymes against the Estate of Bishops, but none more frank, when he declyned, to defend the corruptions of the tyme. But he was vexed with answers, replyes, and rejoinders,* that in the end, the conference of a good Christian woman killed him. A charge was proclamed for the celebration of the Communion upon Easter Day, the year 1614 and 1615. The most part obey ed, howbeit there were acts of the GeneraU Assembly standing against it. Mr John Spotswood was translated from the See of Glasgow to the See of St Andrews. He was no sooner instaUed, but within three days after, that is, upon the 8th of August, Mr John Mal- cohne, minister at Perth, a godly, grave and learned man, being cited, compeared before him and the rest of the Bishops who were present. They found fault with his Epistle Dedicatorie prefixed to his Commentarie upon the Acts : First, Because he requested the King to recaU the banished ministers, aUedging they were more faithfull subjects to his Majesty than those who had receaved great benefices at his hands : Nixt, That he regrated the corruption brought in into our Kirk by unlearned and unsanctified men. He explained his meaning, and subscribed it, at their desyre, for his Majestie's satisfaction. In the beginning of September Mr James Law, Bishop of Ork ney, was inaugurat Bishop of Glasgow. Mr George Grahame, * This evidently refers to his controversy with David Hume of Godscroft. See Calderwood's History, vol. vii. p. 180, &c. ; and Row's History, p. 257. Cowper died at Edinburgh in 1619, (ib. p. 259.) OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 239 Bishop of Dumblane, succeeded to him in the Bishoprick of Orkney. Mr Adam Bannantyne succeeded to Mr George Grahame in the Bishoprick of Dumblane. He was a vehement opposit to the state of Bishops tiU of late. He had said before that Mr George Grahame, the undought of Bishops, had gotten the Bishoprick of Dumblane, the excrement of Bishopricks ; but he is not ashamed to Uck up his excrements, and to accept that mean Bishoprick to patch up that broken lairdship of Kinnocher, [Kinneuchar.] In December 1615, the Courts of the High Commission were united in one, the Archbishop of St Andrews and Glasgow, or any one of them, being one of the number of five, at the least, &c. Seeing the Court of High Commission was the strongest hold the Bishops had, they thought good to make it stronger by uniting the two Courts in one, at the renewing of the Commission occa sioned by the death of the last Archbishop. In this they maintain their usurped authority ; overrule ecclesiasticaU judicatories ; put in execution the acts of pretended AssembUes, overruled by them selves ; knowing very weeU that they wold not find concurrence in Presbyteries or Synods, the ordinary judicatories of the Kirk, to suspend or deprive ministers for not conformitie and obedience to those acts. So the acts of unlawfuU Assemblies are violently obtruded upon the Kirk by a judicatory, which is not a Kirk judi catory, nor yet approved by the lawes of the countrey ; and the Bishops overrule the Kirk by a power never committed to them by the Kirk. Here it is to be observed, that at this tyme Mr John Spotswood and Mr James Law, both sometyme ministers in one Presbyterie, and at the point of suspension, in the purer tymes, for the pro fanation of the Sabbath, are now the only two Archbishops of Scotland, and have power to suspend, deprive, fyne, impri son any minister in Scotland. Two pretty foot-baU men, as Mr Davidsone caUed them, had now, as we may say, the ball at their foot. 240 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION THE PRETENDED BISHOPS THEIR GOVERNEMENT, AND THE EFFECTS OF IT. The pretended Bishops were somewhat moderate and cahne at Synods and Presbyteries tiU the Act of GEsgow [1610] was rati fied in ParUament [1612] ; but after the ratification of the act, with the power of the High Commission, and pretended EpiscopaU authority, they tyrannize. Before, ministers were troubled by the King and CounseU, at their instigation, or by themselves, under pretence of a commission from the GeneraU Assembly ; but now they exerce both a borrowed power from the King, and a power proper to themselves, as they aUedge, by reason of their EpiscopaU office, wherunto they were consecrat, but without consent of our Kirk. Now beginneth alterations in the worship of God; and changes are intended in divine service, and the Confession of Faith. Much bussinesse there was about the excommunication and ab- solvuig the Marquesse of Huntly. He was urged by the High Commission to subscribe the Confession of Faith upon the 12th of June 1616, but he refused to give any kind of satisfaction ; wher- upon he was committed to waird in the Castle of Edinburgh, but was set at Uberty in two or three dayes after, by a warrant from the King to come to Court ; but before Mr Spotswood had ad vertised him of his refusaU, as was aUedged. Upon the 8th of July, it was reported that he was absolved, and receaved in the bosome of the Kirk of England. Our Bishops seemed to storme, aUedging that the Bishops in England were usurping their old" pretended power. All this bussinesse about Huntly, and two or three Papists in the North, was made for a pretended necessity of a GeneraU Assembly in the North, where the Bishops were sure to procure the consent of many ministers to their devices, and io have the fewer opposits out of the South, and the heart of the country. They give out the increase of Poperie was like to produce dangerous effects to the estate both of Kirk and Countrey, and especially in the North. Therefore, upon the OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 241 22d of July, the Generall Assembly was indicted, by publick pro clamation at the Cross of Edinburgh, to be holden at Aberdeen, and to begin the 13th of August. The Bishops directed tlieir missives to the Presbyteries, wherein they wiUed them to send their Moderators, with other Commissioners, and to furnish them with expenses, under the pain of the losse of their Assignations the year foUowing. They excused themselves for the sudden premonition, alledging, they could give no intimation tiU they had receaved a warrand from his Majesty ; as if they had been altogither ignorant of the matters to be treated, and had not been acquainted with the appointment before ; but now, forsooth, there is a fyre broken up suddenly in the North, which wold set all the kirks on fyre if remedy were not provided in tyme : therefore there must be run ning post haste to the North to extinguish that fyre. The Assembly began upon the 13th of August [1616]. Spots- wood stepped into the Moderator's place without election, against the practice and acts of our Kirk, not yet repeaUed by act of any pretended, let be, lawfuU Assembly. Commissions were not con sidered whether free or limited. A number of lords and barrons satt there with their silks and satins, but had no lawfuU commission to vote. Bishops had no commissions from Presbyteries, as they ought to have had, according to the Caveats and to the practice of our Kirk. The Moderators of Presbyteries had no better war rant than the Bishops direction. The Assembly holden at Linlith gow the year 1606 was not a lawful General Assembly; their Act was forged, and concerned only constant Moderators : but the Mo derators at this tyme are the Bishops substitutes, and of another stamp. But what freedome can there be either in this or any other Assembly foUowing after the Assembly holden last at Glasgow, and authorising the Bishops with the power of the High Commission, where such men moderat, vote, direct ? who dare oppose ? This is the mine of our Kirk, that ministers resort to their Assemblies and do not protest for the right constitution and freedome of the Assembly, but joine with them where they cannot _ but be overthrowne with plurality of votes. Q 242 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Much tyme was spent in preaching, renewing old acts and making some new [ones] against Papists, (as if no acts had been made against Papists before, or execut but without successe), that ministers, speciaUy such as came from the South, being wearied, might withdraw themselves before the chiefe matters chiefly aimed at were treated. Many good acts were made indeed, against Papists, but were never ratified in ParUament, far lesse put in execution. But, by the way, the authority of the High Commission was acknowledged indirectly in the acts made against Papists. [John Gordon of] Buckie presented a supph cation in the fourth Session, in name of the Earle of Huntly. The answer was referred to his owne presence. The Bishop of Canterbury his excuse for absolving him was read. Mr Alexander Forbesse, Bishop of Caithnesse, for making Canter- berry beheve that it wold be acceptable service to the Kirk of Scotland, was threatened with deposition. But he was preferred, not long after, before aU other competitors, to the Bishoprick of Aberdeen. In the mean tyme, upon the 16th of August, were produced cer tain instructions directed from the King, anent the devising of a remedy for the defection and falling away of many from the truth. The instructions were advised upon, and after, [it was] statute and ordained upon the 17th of August, That provision be made for learned, wise and peaceable men, in vaiking places of the chief Burrows and towns ; that care be had of transplanting of the most learned and most discreet Ministers, and placeing them where noblemen, especially such as are inclyned to Poperie, make resi dence ; that Bishops in their visitation of kirks, either by them selves, or, where they cannot overtake the businesse, the minister of the paroch, make aU young chUdren of six years of age, be pre sented before them, to give the confession of their faith, that so it may appear in what rehgion they have been trained up. Spots- wood added in the margine, " and that they be recommended to God by solemne prayer at the tyme, for the increase of their know ledge and continuance of his grace with them." No mention here OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 243 of the imposition of hands ; but who could hinder the Bishop to im pose hands, when he recommended them to God ? Farther, it was statut, That after that tryall, the ministers of the parish, every two or three years, once at the least, examine them, that, after sufficient growth in knowledge, they may be admitted to the holy Commu nion. They ordained Mr Patrick GaUoway, Mr John Hall and Mr John Adamson, then minister at Libertoun, to form a Cate- chisme, and to have it in readinesse before the 1st of October, to the effect the same may be aUowed and printed with the King's Ucence ; and that none other be used in families for the instruction of cluldren and servants, who must give account thereof in their examination before the Communion. Farther, it was also ordained, That an uniforme order of Liturgie or divine service be sett downe to be read in aU kirks on the ordinary days of prayer. Mr Patrick GaUoway, Mr Peter Hewat, Mr John Adamson and Mr WiUiam Arskine, to this intent, were appointed to revise the Book of Com mon Prayers contained in the Psalm Books, and to sett downe a common forme of ordinary Service to be used at aU tymes here after, which shaU be used in time of common prayers in aU kirks, where there is exercise of common prayers, as likewise by the mi nister (where there is no reader) before sermon. Mr James Law, Bishop of Glasgow, and Mr WUliam Struthers, minister of Edin burgh, two learned clerks, forsooth, for such a purpose, were ap pointed to put in forme the EcclesiasticaU Canons drawne forth of the Books of the former AssembUes ; and where the same is defect ive, supphe it by Canons of CounseUs and EcclesiasticaU Conven tions in former tymes. It was statut, That the Confession of Faith presented to this Assembly, (penned, as we heard, by Mr John HaU and Mr John Adamson), be receaved universaUy throughout the whole kingdome : To the which aU hereafter shall be bound to swear and set their hands, especiaUy such as bear office in the Church at their acceptation of the office, and likewise, students in schools and coUedges. It was ordained, That the Communion be celebrated four tymes in the year in burrow townes, and twice in Endwart, so that the tyme of Easter be one of the tymes. It was Q2 244 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION ordained, That baptisme shall not be denyed to any infant, when either of the parents, or any faithfuU Christian in place of the pa rent, shaU require the same ; and that the same be granted any tyme of day, without respect or delay in regard of the hour of preaching. Item, It was ordained, That every minister have a per fect and formaU register of baptismes, marriages and buriaUs, &c. Four dayes were spent upon articles made against Papists, how beit they might have been concluded in one hour ; but these acts were aU ended in one Session. A number of the ministerie, fore seeing what was - to be proponed, and finding the Assembly made for the purpose, withdrew themselves. Others, in the mean tyme, abode. There rest nothing then to the pretended Moderator, but to ask at those who were present, " What say ye, my Lord ? — what say ye, Laird ? — what say ye, Mr Doctor ?" It was answer ed, " WeeU, my Lord." If any man pressed to speak unasked, the Bishop wagged his finger, and that meant sUence. The crowes were not more affrayed of a scarr crow, than slavish ministers were of the wagging of the Bishop's finger. The ministers rounded in other's eares, " How can we either vote or speak freely, having the King's guard standing behind our backs ?" The Bishops of St Andrews, Glasgow, Dunkelden, Murray, Eosse, GaUoway, Brechin, Orkney, Caithnesse, Dumblane, Argyle, Isles, Patrick Forbesse of Corse, George Douglas, minister at Cul- len, Mr John Eeid, minister at Loggie-Buchan, Mr George Hay, minister at Turreff, Doctor Hendry Phillip, minister at Arbroth, Mr David Lindsay, minister at Dundee, Mr WUUam Scott, minis ter at Couper, Doctor Eobert Howie, Sector of St Andrews, Mr John Mitchelson, minister at BruntUand, Mr Patrick GaUoway, Mr John HaU, Mr WUliam Struthers, ministers of Edinburgh, Mr Ed ward Hepburne, minister at Haugh, Doctor John Abernethie, mi nister at Jedburgh, Mr Eobert Scott, minister at Glasgow, Mr WU liam Birnie, minister at Air, Mr WUliam Arskeen, minister at Din- i ninno, or the most part of them, had full power and commission to conveen at Edinburgh the 1st day of December nixt to come, to take order with the dUapidators of benefices. The most part of OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 245 them had power likewise to take order anent the planting of suffi cient and quahfied ministers at the kirks of burrow-towns presently vacant ; and likewise to receave from the Bishop of Glasgow, and Mr WUUam Struthers, the Cannons of Church Disciphne, commit ted to their charge, to revise the same, aUow and disaUow thereof, and direct a supphcation to his Majestie, that it would please his Highnesse to ratify and approve the same, and to approve the printing thereof by his royaU authority. Bishop Spottswood addeth in his scroUs these words foUowing : — "Item, Power to receave the Books of Liturgie or Divine Service, and the samen being aUowed, to cause pubUsh the same in print, and the Catechisme, aUow or disaUow thereof, as they shaU think expedient ; and the same being aUowed, to cause pubUsh the same in print for the Service within the kirks of aU the kingdomes. As also to revise the Confession of Faith presented to this Assembly, and, after mature dehberation, to take order that the same may be pubhshed ; and in aU these things to do as they wUl be answerable to God, the Kings Majesty, and the Church." The Confession of Faith seemeth to be devised of purpose to thrust out the former Confession, subscribed and sworne by persons of all Estates, and binding them to maintaine the estabhshed Disci pline, and to detest and renounce all traditions, and ceremonies de vised by Antichrist for wanting the warrant of the Word. The Book of the Cannons we doubt was ever perfected by those to whom it was committed, or yet the revising of the Book of our Common Prayers, and setting down a common forme of ordi- narie Service ; neither yet have we heard that those Commis sioners ever mett for the revising of their traveUs. The Marquesse of Huntly was reserved for a flourish tUl the end of the Assembly, and absolved in the last Session after he had sub scribed the new Confession of Faith. .- After the dissolving of this Assembly, Mr WUUam Struthers, who went to Aberdeen without commission from the Presbyterie of Edinburgh, feU out in his sermon, in Edinburgh, in a great com mendation of the proceedings of that Assembly, and affirmed that 246 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION aU things were done with so great wisdome, gravity and godlinesse that they left a notable testimony of their upright deaUing to the posterity. He was then a pensioner, that is, a souldier waidged to maintaine the present course. For decoreing the EoyaU ChappeU of the Palace of Halyrud- house before the King's coming downe, place was prepared for the organs and quiresters, the statues of the twelve Apostles and four Evangelists curiously wroght in timber, which were to be gUded and set up. But the people murmuring, the Bishops, Mr Patrick GaUoway and Mr John HaU, disswaded the King from setting up the images. A discharge was returned from the King, but with a eharpe rebuke and check of ignorance from the King and Bishop of Canterburrie. Some Noblemen, CounseUors and Bishops communicated kneeU- ing in the EoyaU ChappeU in the month of June, [1617] not re garding either Christ's institution or the order of our Kirk, but only forward to please the King. This was the first tyme since I the Eeformation that the singing of quiristers and the playing of organs was heard in the EoyaU ChappeU. These dumb doggs, the ministers of Edinburgh, were sUent, neither disswading the King in private, nor opening their mouth in pubhck. In the tyme of Parhament there past an article amongst the Lords of the Articles, to wit, That Bishops should be elected by the Chapters, which is contrary to the acts of GeneraU Assem bUes ; the Bishops themselves consenting if not devising that article. The two Archbishops protested before a number of mi nisters conveened in the Little Kirk, that no alteration was in- \ tended. And yet not only the former article was concluded amongst the Lords of the Articles, but also the day foUowing an other was agreed upon, which was like to cutt the cords of the remanent hberties of the Kirk ; to wit, That his Majesty, with advise of the Archbishops, Bishops, and such a competent number of the Ministerie as his Majesty, out of his wisdome, shaU think expedient, shaU, in all tyme coming, have full power to advise and conclude matters decent for the external policie of the Kirk, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 247 not repugnant to the Word of God ; and that such conclusions shaU have the strength and power of EcclesiasticaU Lawes. This was to make of no avaUl our GeneraU AssembUes, and to give way to the King and the Bishops to bring in ChanceUors, Deans, Officials, surpUces, coapes, capps, kneeUing, holy dayes, crosse in baptisme or whatsomever other ceremonies, Eomish or AnglicaU, which they should deeme not repugnant to the Word of God. The Bishops assured the ministers that nothing should be agreed upon or consented unto by them in matters concerning the Church, the discipUne and order thereof, without their speciaU knowledge and advice; and affirmed, that neither they nor the ministers there assembled had power to consent to the smaUest change of the order of our Kirk already estabhshed, unlesse the speciaU advice and determination of the GeneraU Assembly, re presenting the body of the Kirk of this kingdome, were had thereunto. Many of the ministers, being perswaded with these speeches, went out of the towne resting upon their word. Others, remain ing after they understood that such an article was agreed upon amongst the Lords of the Articles, and to passe in a law, resolved upon a protestation against it in open Parliament. The ministers of Edinburgh seemed as forward as any of the whole number. Mr Patrick GaUoway said often he wold subscribe it with his blood, yet refused to subscribe it with pen and ink, lest the King should have seen his name after the presenting of it. It was therefore advised, that Mr Archibald Simpson should subscribe as Scribe in name of the rest, and that the rest set downe their names in a roU for a warrant, whereof he should have a custody. Mr Peter Hewat was appointed to present it, because he had place in Parhament as Abbot of CorsragueU. The King was made ac quainted with their proceedings by Mr Patrick GaUoway, as we were informed ; and, therefore, Mr Peter Hewat was chaUenged when he came downe to the Palace. Some brethren, having heard of that which was fallen forth, appointed Mr Archibald Simpson to present another coppie, in caise Mr Peter had failed, or been 248 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION impeded to discharge his commission. When the Lords con veened in the Parhament House, Mr Archibald presented his coppie to the Clerk of Register to be read before the Estates ; but he refused. The King, after some conference with the Bishops, entered, and sat downe in his throne. When this article was to be read, he declared he wold passe from it, because it bindeth him to take advice : he wold do in that matter as he thought good, according to his royaU prerogative. Among other reasons they used, they remembered the King, that diverse tymes he had sufficiently secured them from aU suspicion of innovation, espe ciaUy by a proclamation upon the 26th of September 1605, when rumors of intended conformity with the Kirk of England were spread abroad ; by which proclamation, the hearts of aU honest men settled themselves in confidence that no such thing should be attempted : and again, by his Majesty's letter sent downe the last winter, to take away aU fear of any alteration which might arise upon his intended journey ; intimation whereof was made in the pulpits by his Majesties speciaU -wiU, and direction of chief counsellors. THE NAMES OF THOSE WHO SUBSCRIBED THE ROLL, JUNE 27, 1617. Messvs Patrick GaUoway, John HaU, Andrew Ramsay, WUUam Struthers, Robert Scot, John Balfour, Robert Colvine, Thomas Sydserf, Hendry Blyth, George Grier, John Aird, James Burnet, Archibald Simpson, WUliam Black, Simon Johnstoun, William Arthur, William Weemes, George Dumbarr, John Scrimgeor, James Ingles, WiUiam Knox, John Smith, Michael Wallace, Patrick Shaw, John Alexander, Robert Murray, Charles Lums- dane, Patrick Hamilton, David Calderwood, John Ker, Walter Whitfoord, John Chalmers, James Porteous, Luke Sonsie, James Lamb, WUliam Guild, WiUiam Douglas, John Merser, George Chalmers, James Robertson, Henry Livingstoun, John Cheialy, Francis Collace, William Justice, John Weems, Alexander For- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 249 rest, WUUam Jameson, Alexander Keith, Andrew Balfour, Robert Rough, Robert Hemes, Theodor Hay, Adam Simpson, James French, WUliam Scot, a minister in the West. Mr Archibald Simpson, minister of Dalkeith, was committed to waird in the Castle of Edinburgh, for not exhibiting the roU of the names. He had given the roU to Mr Patrick Henderson, reader of the Great Kirk of Edinburgh, who delivered it to Mr David Cal derwood, minister at CraiUing. Mr Peter Hewat, who should have presented the protestation, Mr Archibald Simpson, who was Scribe to the meeting, and Mr David Calderwood, who had the roU of the names of the subscribers, were summoned to compear before the High Commission, which was to be holden at Saint Andrews the 8th of July, but was continued tiU the 12th of July, at which tyme [the King] himselfe was to be present in person. Mr Peter Hewat was deprived and confyned in Dundee. It was aUedged, that his voice could not serve him to teach any longer, and, therefore, [he] was content to be removed from the minis terie with honesty, and to Uve upon the Abbacie whereunto he was provided, where he maketh his residence for the present. Mr Archibald Simpson was confyned in Aberdeen, where he remained tiU the Earle of Morton obtained his Uberty. Mr- David Calderwood answered, that he had rendered the names of the roUs to Mr Archibald Simpson. As for the other point of the libell, The assisting of that mutinous meeting, he answered, That when that meeting shaU be condemned as mutinous, he shaU answer for his particular assistance. When he could not be induced to acknowledge a fault in subscribing the Protestation, they passed from the hbell ; and the King urged him with a conformity and obedience to the acts of Assembly, especiaUy to acknowledge his Ordinar the Bishop of Glasgow, and to repair to his Diocesian Synod. He aUedged, he was not bound to answer farther than to the points of the lybeU ; yet being urged by the King to answer, he refused to promise conformity. Whereupon he was removed, caUed in again, and suspended till October nixt to come ; and the Bishop of Glasgow was enjoined 250 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION to deprive him, in caise he repaired not to the Synod at that tyme. He aUedged, that the King in the pubUck disputations the day preceeding had disclaimed the power of deprivation primario, and consequently of suspension. The King aUedged, The Bishops, Fathers of the Kirk and EcclesiasticaU- persons, had given out the sentence. Then turning him to Spotswood and the rest of his fel lows he used this dUemma : — " The power ye have, ye have it either of his Majesty or from the Kirk. Ye have it not from his Majesty ; for his Majesty cannot communicate to you the power that he clameth not to himselfe : nemo potest transferre in alium plus juris quam quod in se habet. AU the power which ye can pretend to have from the Kirk, is grounded upon the Act of Glasgow, which grant ed only that every Bishop in severaU, associating to himseffe some of the ministers of the bounds where the dehnquent serveth, may suspend or depose. That cannot be done in this Court ; therefore I cannot acknowledge your sentence." Often did the King urge him to acquiesce, and demand, as is aUedged, E he wold desist for a certain tyme, in case he should command him by his royaU autho rity, as from Mmselfe. He being disturbed by confused speaking and rude behaviour of those that stood by, and supposing that the King was stUl urgeing obedience to the sentence, he answered as before. Whereupon he was removed, caUed in again, and the sen tence of deprivation was pronounced : whereunto he wold have answered again, as he did before when the sentence of suspension was pronounced ; but he was commanded to closse waird in the Tolbooth of St Andrews, whence he was transported to Edinburgh, where he was detained till he found caution acted in the Books of Secret CounseU for his departure out of the countrey, conforme to the ordinance of the CounseU given thereanent, subscribed by St Andrews and Binning. His cause was never heard before the CounseU, and yet the CounseU fortifyeth the sentence of the High Commission. That same night the sentence was pronounced against these three ministers above named, Mr John HaU, Mr Patrick GaUoway, Mr WiUiam Struthers, and Mr Andrew Ramsay, minister of Edin- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 251 burgh, howbeit they had exhorted the other three to stand to the protestation, acknowledged upon their knees, that if they had known his Majesty wold have taken offence at them for their conveening and subscribing the Protestation, they wold not have done it ; and so got a kisse of the King's hand. The day foUowing, that is, the Lord's day, the 13th of July, the Bishops to please the King, (who made him beheve he had no more ado when he came in the countrey, but to give his presence), presented to the ministers of sundry Synods, conveened afternoon, Five Articles which were after concluded at Perth. The Mi nisters wold not meddle, but referred to the GeneraU Assembly. When Spotswood came from Court, after the King's departure out of the countrey, he reported that the King wold have a Gene raU Assembly, and the Five Articles reasoned and concluded; but wold not appoint tyme nor place tUl the Commissioners were first chosen : a preposterous order, but agreeable to the corrupt course which the Bishops had in hand, that is, [that] the Assem bly should not be indicted tiU they were first acquainted with the names of the Commissioners, and not then, if they find them not plyable to their purpose. Nay, farther, the Commissioners must be chosen in their presence, and where they had authority. They had their Diocesian Synods, for the most part, in October, where, themselves being present, the Commissioners were chosen for the GeneraU Assembly, which was not then indicted, but to be in dicted. When some were nominate by the Synod of Fife, holden at St Andrews the 5th of October, the Bishops wold not admitt the nomination of some of them. Upon the 4th of November the Assembly was indicted, by sound of trumpet, at the croce of Edinburgh, to be holden at St Andrews the 25th of that instant month 1617. This intimation was not tymous nor sufficient. Sundrie diocies were absent, and that through default of tymous warning. This is another exception against this Assembly ; for aU that have interest ought to be timously warned beforehand. The first day of their meeting, Spotswood, in his exhortation, enveighed bitterly against many worthy men of the ministery 252 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION who then were resting from their labours, and affirmed that some of them were worthy to be hanged. He caUed Mr Andrew Mel vUl a seditious fyrie man, — so bold and impudent was the man, who, in former tymes, durst scarce open his mouth in his pre sence ; but necessity lay upon him to be thus shamelesse ; for the King was made privie of late to a leud prank played by him, and he thought such invectives wold be acceptable service. The King and Bishops purpose was notwithstanding withstood. The Bishops therefore desyred something might be devised for the King's satisfaction. Mr Patrick GaUoway and some others were appointed for this purpose. They devised, that if there be any sick person within their paroch, visited with long sicknesse, and unable to repair to the kirk to receave the Communion, the pastor shaU not refuse to administrate the Communion in his house, providing there be six persons, at the least, of good rehgion and conversa tion, present, to receave with him ; and not tiU he hath declared, upon his conscience, that he thinketh his sicknesse to be deadly, and forewameth his minister twenty-four hours before. Nixt, That the minister, in the celebration of the Communion, give the elements out of his owne hand to every communicant, saying, when he giveth the bread, " Take, eat, this is the bodie of the Lord Jesus Christ, which was broken for you, do this in remembrance of him ;" and exhorting him to be thankfull. And when he giveth the cup, saying, " This is the blood of Jesus Christ shed for you, do this in remembrance of him ;" and exhorting him likewise to be thankfuU. It seemeth there was not fuU agreement, but that all the Articles were referred to the nixt Asssembly, in respect, a great number of Commissioners from Synods, Presbyteries, burroughs, and gentlemen, were absent by reason of the season of the year, distance of place, and shortnesse of advertisment ; neither ought any of their resolutions to have been acknowledged for the same respects, and other exceptions above mentioned. Whereas they thought to have surprised the ministers with short advertise ment, it turned to their disadvantage. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 253 Enmediately after the dissolving of this meeting, Mr Andrew Ramsay, one of the ministers of Edinburgh, declaimed pubhckly against the intended novations, but, not long after, became a de fender of them. The Commissioners appointed by the Parhament to see to the plantation of kirks and modification of ministers stipends, satt till Christmasse. The Bishops tainted many ministers with the hope of augmentation of their stipends. Bishop Spotswood preached in the Great Kirk of Edinburgh upon the 25th of December, and laboured to prove the observa tion of festivaU dayes to be lawfuU. Bishop Cowper taught in the ChappeU RoyaU, where there was playing upon organs. So the Bishops practised novations before they were approved by the GeneraU Assembly. Sundry brutes * went in the month of January 1618, that the King was highly incensed at the Bishops, because the Five Articles were not receaved, and at the ministerie for driving tyme ; that he wold let the Kirk of Scotland know what it is to have to do with an old King, or to abuse his lenitie ; that there was a war rant sent downe from the King to discharge Presbyteries and Sessions of particular kirks, as mutinous conventions. After the ¦ spreading of these brutes for preparing the way, Spotswood con- vocated the Bishops and Ministers, who were for the present in Edinburgh, upon the 26th of January. -The King's letter was read, wherein he manifested his wiU and pleasure, that they should conveen, and approve the Five Articles ; and, if any refused their consent, that the Bishops suspend him. But how is it likely that the King could know whether any countrey ministers were to be in Edinburgh at that tyme ? Belike the Bishops had blanks to fiU up as occasion requyred, and, at this tyme, to make use of one after the spreading of former brutes, hoping to get some advan tage by sudden frayes. Upon the 28th of January, universaU cessation and abstinence, upon the five Holy Dayes, was enjoined by proclamation, to the * Or bruits, reports. 254 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION effect, the subjects may the better attend the holy exercises which his Majesty, with advice of the Kirk, wold appoint to be keept at these tymes in the Kirk. AU manner of husbandrie and handy labors were discharged, with certification, that the contraveeners shaU be punished with aU rigour, as disobedient and rebellious persons, contemners of his Majestie's authority. Here ye see the observation of holy dayes was enjoined, notwithstanding no GeneraU Assembly had yet consented, and Acts of Parliament were standing in the contrair yet unrepeaUed. Patrick Forbesse, laird of Corse, in a letter sent to Bishop Spots- wood, and dated the 16th of February 1618, conveyed his answer concerning his acceptation of the Bishoprick of Aberdeen, after such a forme that the Bishops might easUy know he wold accept the Bishoprick nolens volens; nay farther, he insinuated, that his accept ation would grace the office. He pretended that he was loath to be an urger of the ceremonies upon others ; yet none was so ready at Perth to consent to the Five Articles, — none so vehement afterward for the practice of them as himselfe. He pretended he wold not enter but upon such and such conditions ; yet he entered by the election of a Chapter, and without swearing to the Caveats as others had done before him. It is weU knowne that he undertook not the ministerie till Bishopricks were in deaUing, and that he could find no better mean to repair his decaying estate. A charge for observation of Holy Dayes was again pubhshed, and within thrie or four dayes after, that is, upon the third of AprUe, the Magistrates of Edinburgh sent the officers through the town to observe there was no work nor trading, because, as they aUedged, the King had sent a letter to Provost and BaUies to ob serve Good Fryday. No respect was had to the Acts of Parlia ments or Assemblies. Bishop Couper taught in the RoyaU Chap peU. Upon Easter-day the Communion was celebrate by sundry Bishops in their CathedraU Kirks with kneeUing, and in the RoyaU ChappeU by Bishop Couper, and again in the RoyaU ChappeU upon Whitsunday. So the Bishops practised the ceremonies as occasion OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 255 offered, before the GeneraU Assembly had determined upon an an swer to the King. The Commissioners appointed by the last Parhament to modifie and augment ministers stipends, united sometymes two, sometymes three kirks in one. The Bishops consented to those unions to currie the favour of noblemen or for gain. Ministers were further ed or hindered as they hked or misliked the Five Articles. THE FTVE ARTICLES. When the Bishops had prepared persons at the Platt or at Synods, or upon other occasions, then they thought it high tyme to have ane Assembly for concluding the Five Articles. Rumours were spread, that we should never have the hberty of a GeneraU Assembly again; yet upon the 3d of August [1618], an Assembly was indicted by pubhc proclamation to be holden at Perth the 25th day of the same moneth, which was but a short advertisement. Spottiswood in his sermon protested, in the presence of God, that the Five Articles were sent to him to be insert among the Canons of the Church, which were then ingathering; that he humbly excus ed himself, that he could not insert that which was not first advised by the Church ; that he heard nothing of them afterward, tiU the King, taking advantage of their misbehaviour who penned the protestation, and proudly stood to the same, resolved to have these Articles admitted ; that he laboured they might be referred to an Assembly, which was obtained upon promise that his Majestie should receave satisfaction. He aUedged, that the promise was not made by him alone, but was ratifyed by others also of that number who were at the Assembly holden at St Andrews ; that he, with the rest of my Lords the Bishops, excused the delay made at that tyme, but the letter was hardly accepted and an other returned full of anger and indignation ; that he traveUed at the ministers earnest sohcitation, to divert the troubles, which, before that tyme, they wold most certainly have felt. But who can beheve his protestations and aUedgeances ? Suppose they were 256 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION not the first devisers, yet they offered their assistance and best endeavours. What he and his feUows, and others, their adhe rents, promised at St Andrews, is not to be imputed to the rest. . The Articles were motioned before the Protestation was formed, as may appear by the contents of the forementioned Protestation itselfe. But it was his craft to mention that Protestation, and the King's irritation, that the ministers present might be terrified from protestations. How could any of the ministers be troubled for any of the Five Articles not yet concluded, but acts and laws standing in the contrair ; and, consequently, how could he avert such troubles, for such a cause ? But any fiction was aUedged that might terrify for the tyme. Noblemen, Barrons, Burgesses, Bishops and Doctors sat at a long table upon forms ; but ministers were left to stand behind, as if their place and part had been only to behold. The Bishops carry some majesty on their part to dash simple ministers. Spottswood placed himselfe in the Moderator's chair without election. When Mr George Grier, minister at Haddingtoun, desired that the order of free election might be observed, he answered saucUy, The As sembly was conveened within the bounds of his charge, wherein, so long as he served, he trusted no man wold take his place. A new Clerk was chosen without formaU election or votting. Ministers were warned to give in their commissions before the sitting downe of the Assembly in the afternoon. So it was not knowne who had lawfuU commission, who not, tUl the votting of the Five Articles in the end of the Assembly. When it was asked, Whether aU nobler men and barrons and ministers there present should have power to vote, the usurping Moderator, Spottswood, answered, " No mi nisters that wanted commission ; but voice could not be denyed to noblemen and barrons who were come upon his Majesty's missives." But the first part of his answer was not observed, and the second was false. Fearing to be troubled with moe questions, he enjoined silence, and requyred the King's letter to be read. Doctor Young, Dean of Wincester, presented the letter. It was twice read in open audience, to make a more forcible impression of terror. The letter OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 257 was expostulatorie, wherein he remembers how he had been pro voked in former tymes, and wisheth to be no farther provoked. After the reading of this letter, the Bishop aUedged, That he was perswaded his Majestie wold be more glade of the consent of this Assembly to these Five Articles, than of aU the gold of Eidia ; but in caise of their refusaU, he assured them, the whole estate and order of our Kirk wold be overthrowne. Some ministers wold be banished, others deprived ; aU wold be brought under the wrath of authority. He adviseth them rather to consent in tyme, nor afterward to begg favour by offering conformity as others have done. To this effect he aUedged, that Mr John Sharp, one of the ministers banished for the disordered conventicle holden at Aber deen, as he caUed it, had written to him the night before, to in tercede with the King for hberty to him to return to his owne na tive countrey, and had offered to submitt himselfe to aU good order in tyme coming. But the letter was neither read nor seen. His aversnesse to conformitie is known to the whole country since his returne. " O," said the Bishop, " I know when some of you are banished and others deprived, ye wiU blame us, and call us persecutors ; but we wUl lay aU the burthen upon the King, and if ye caU him a persecutor, aU the world wiU stand up against you." Then Doctor Young foUowed, and laid out all the taunts and reproaches breathed out at Court against the proceedings of the last meeting holden at Saint Andrews, as if their taunts and reproaches were much to be regarded; his Majestie's high dis pleasure kindled by occasion thereof, like a flame of fyre, ready to consume aU, except it were quenched at that Assembly, by con senting to the Five Articles ; but these last words, " like a flame of fyre, ready to consume aU except it were quenched at that Assembly, by consenting to the Five Articles," are omitted in his printed discourse. But it is sufficient against the freedome of the Assembly, that he aUedgeth the sorrows of his heart have been enlarged, since the last Assembly holden at St Andrews, to hear such words of indignation and just displeasure, so often to proceed out of the mouth of so good and gracious a Prince, like R 258 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Moses, the meekest man upon the face of the earth. Sed verendum etiam atque etiam, quo exeat patientia tarn scepe Icesa. The ministers, defenders of the estabhshed order, perceaving the drift of these speeches and discourses, requyred four things : 1. That none be admitted to vote, but such as were authorized by lawfuU commission. Spottswood answered, His Majesty had writ ten to some noblemen and barrons to be present : if any man had any exception against them he should be heard. It was replyed, That they wold not except against their honorable persons, but only craved the order of the Kirk might be observed, whereby it is provided, that none have place to vote in General Assembhes without commission. 2. That the Uberty of the Kirk be not violat in the election of a Moderator. Spottswood answered, That the Assembly was convocat within the bounds of his Diocie : He wold understand who wold take the place over his head. 3. That the Articles proponed in short and generaU summs might be putt in forme, and amplie extended, as his Majesty wold have them to be enacted, that they might be the better advised upon and consi dered. He answered, " Let alone those toyes : trouble us not with these needlesse questions ; we shall speak of these things in the Privie Conference." 4. That some of either opinion may be set apart to coUect and putt in order the reasons of either syde, for the more sure and easy information of the Assembly. This motion was also rejected. The pretended Moderator proceeded at his owne pleasure, with out advice or information of Commissioners from Synods or Pres byteries, to the nomination of those that were to meet in the Privie Conference. Some few of the sounder sort were taken in, to try the force of their arguments or answers, before they be proponed in pubhck. The King's letter was read again in the Privie Conference, which Spottswood seconded with many terrors. He aUedged, that four of the Articles were concluded already, in the Assemblies holden last at Aberdeen and St Andrews, howbeit not in forme as his Majesty requyred; that his Highnesse alto- gither refused the cautions and conditions added as frustrations of OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 259 his intentions : that his Majesty was stiU offended at the Assem bly holden at St Andrews. Of those two Assemblyes and their proceedings, we have treated sufficiently already. He wold have KneeUing put to voteing without reasoning, for removing the offence his Majesty conceaved. After much deaUing, reasoning was granted. The ministers standing for the established order craved again that the Articles might be put in perfect forme ; that the reasons of moment might be proponed in writ, and some of . either syde appointed to put them in due forme. But the pre tended Moderator, notwithstanding of the reference of those con ditions to the Privie Conference, rejected them. They desyred the other partie wold prove them necessary and expedient for our Kirk, or otherwise improve the former order already established. But he aUedged, they must either prove the Articles to be impious and unlawfuU, or else they must prove disobedient to his Majesty. Notwithstanding of whatsover could be aUedged, they were forced to object against the said Articles. Some few reasons were proponed that night, but were cutt off by cavilling and quarrelling at men's persons, rather than solidly answered. The day foUowing, in the morning, much tyme was spent with the Bishop's discourses ; and after, some few argu ments were proponed and answered as before, by the other partie. The pretended Moderator was instant to have the matter put to voteing. The ministers aUedged, that the proper use of the Conference was, to prepare and put in order matters that were to be treated in the pubUct Assembly,— for that should be prejudi ciaU to the publict voteing ; and therefore requyred, That the voteing and farder reasoning might be reserved to the full As sembly. The pretended Moderator replyed, That it was the cus tome of the Lords of the Articles in Parliament, to proceed after that manner; that he wold not spare to committ twentie preju dices to pleasure the King ; that the voteing in Conference was only by way of advice, and not to determine ; yet how difficiU is it to make men vote in publick, contrair to their advice in private, and before the same persons. As for the order observed in the r2 260 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION ParUament, it is no rule for AssembUes to imitate in their proceed ings. AU upon the Conference votted to the change of the ges ture of sitting in the act of receaving the sacramentaU elements, into the gesture of kneeUing, except ten or eleven. Mr WiUiam Couper, Bishop of GaUoway, in his sermon upon the 27th of August, sett at nought the ancient order of the Kirk, sometymes highly commended by himself; and, extoUing his owne new light, presumed to catechize those who might have catechized him. The last Session, which was only the second, was holden after dinner. The King's Commissioners, the Secretarie, Lord Scoone and Carnegie, and the Bishops— masters and rulers of the Assem bly — assured the Ministers, that out of that house they should not go tUl his Majesty were satisfied. The pretended Moderator as sured them, his Majesty behoved to be satisfied; that his High nesse wold accept of no other answer but yeelding ; urged voting without further delay ; insulted upon them. " I know weU enough, (said he), there is none of you that wUl suffer so much as the losse of your stipends for the matter ; that none that voteth in the con trair mindeth to suffer : Some pretend conscience and fear, more to offend the people than the King ; but aU that wUl not do the turn. Think not but when the act is made I wUl get obedience." Yet a Uttle before, he had said, that although the act were made, his Majestie wold be merciful in urgeing obedience ; and that they knew himselfe to be more favourable to the brethren than any Bishop in England. He took it upon his conscience, that there was neither Esse nor lad, rich nor poor, in Scotland, (some few precise persons excepted), who wished not the order of KneeUing to be receaved. Whereas it was aUedged in a pamphlet, that the Bishops were bringing in Papistrie, and good professors wold fight in defence of their owne religion, he answered, That the ceremonies made not separation betwixt us and the Eoman Kirk, but their idolatrie, which, if the Eomanists wold forsake, they wold meet them midway, and joine with them. As if some professors had been disposed to fight, he disswaded them to lean to them, and wished if such things should happen, it wold please his Majesty to make OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 261 him a Captaine, and was assured that none of those braggers wold come to the field. After these blasts, the Ministers were instant to have the Articles reasoned upon in fuU Assembly, for infomiation of all those who had place to vote. After much dealhng some shew of hberty was granted ; but the proponers were quickly cutt off and soundly re buked, rather borne downe with authority than satisfied with rea son. Secretarie Hamilton, and the pretended Moderator enjoined them strictly, either to propone a new argument, or else to hold their peace, when as the argument had either not been proponed before in the Conference, or not answered, or the reply was in terrupted, and aU was new to the fuU Assembly. Many ministers had not so much as accesse to hear, or propone ; for they had not seats provided for them, and gentlemen thronged in before them. The defenders of the Articles were suffered to discourse as long as they pleased, to gybe, mock, caviU ; so light account made they of the fearfuU rent which might ensue, that their behaviour was of fensive to the beholders. When it was aUedged, out of Zanchius, that even things indifferent abused to idolatrie, should be altogither removed, the usurping Moderator opponed the judgment of the King of Great Britain to his judgment, or of any other of the learned. In a word, he professed plainly, that neither their rea sons nor their number should carry away the matter : these Arti cles must be concluded, and shaU be concluded, although there were none but the eleven Bishops, (no more were present), with the authority of his Majestie's Commissioners to impose them. Their best defence was taken from the authority of the King's sword, which was of greater weight than his Majestie's judgment. It was aUedged, he wold ranverse aU, except we yeeld. Some of them confessed, that if his Majesty could have been dissuaded, they would have reasoned against the introducing of these Articles into our Kirk. Doctor Lindsay, being posed in conscience, con fessed that they had neither scripture, reason, nor antiquity for Kneelhng : but to avert the King's wrath, thought it best to yeeld. But in his defence of the Proceedings of this Assembly, he hath 262 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION wrested his owne words to another sense. There was much confu sion because of haste ; for the King's chief Commissioner, Secretar Hamilton, and the Bishops resolved to conclude, and end in this Session. The ministers, not being suffered to reason and prose cute their arguments, and fearing prejudice in voting, gave in some Articles in writ to be considered, and professed they were ready to present in writ reasons against every one of the Articles. They suspected the presenter, Mr John Scrimgeor, minister of King- horn, was to present a protestation against the proceedings of the Assembly, and, therefore, commanded them to subscribe these Articles ; but when he was perceaved to seek a pen to subscribe, the pretended Moderator receaved them out of his hands. Two of them only were read, but no wayes respected, and the rest were suppressed. The ministers requested voting might be suspended, tiU their reasons were sent to the King's Majestie in writ, and an swer returned ; but their request was despised. Before the roU was caUed, the King's letter was read againe in open audience of the Assembly, no doubt to leave the last impres sion. The ministers, defenders of the estabhshed order, requyred again, that none might have place to vote, but such as was autho rized with lawfull commission. The pretended Moderator an swered, If all Scotland were present there they should vote. The pretended Moderator certified those that were present, that who soever voted against the Articles, his name should be marked, and sent up to his Majesty. He took the catalogue of the names from the Clerk, and caUed first on the King's Commissioners and their Assessors ; then the Noblemen, Bishops, and Barrons ; then the Doctors and Ministers ; and last of aU the Burgesses. The Doc tors and Ministers names were caUed upon without order ; for he called first on those of whose consent he was assured, without res pect to the order of Province or Presbyterie. The Articles were not put to voting severaUy, but thus : " WUl you accept, or refuse the Five Articles ?" Or sometymes thus : " WUl ye consent to these Articles, or disobey the King ?" In calling of the names, he willed them often to have the King in their mind ; to remember the King. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 263 He assured them, that he that denyed one of the Articles should be reputed to deny aU. In the end, the Five Articles were con cluded by plurality of votes. The King's Commissioners, and their Assessors, aU the Noblemen except OchUtrie, and aU the Barrons except Wauchtoun, who was not present in that Session, all the Doctors except Doctor Strang, aU the burgesses and a number of ministers, votted for the Articles. Forty-five ministers voted negative; some few, non liquet. Doctor Lindsay affirmeth, that forty-one of the ministers voted negative. Some voted wanting commission ; others whom they feared were pretermitted. The nuUity of this Assembly may be inferred upon these rea sons : — First, Commissioners of some Presbyteries were absent by reason of untymous premonition : four Diocies were absent, Orkney, Caithnesse, Argyle, and the Isles. Second, Spottswood usurped the Moderator's place without election, which was against the order estabhshed in our Kirk, and practise, even when we had Superintendents and Bishops ; against the Cautions agreed upon at Montrose, and the Cautions agreed upon at their owne Convention, holden at Linlithgow 1606; neither was this order repeaUed at the Assembly holden at Glasgow, nor any mention made there but of moderation of Synods and Presbyteries. Third, Many votted wanting commissions. Bishops ought not to have voted unlesse they had had commissions from some Presbyterie, as was agreed upon in the Cautions at Montrose. No Barron ought to have vote, according to the act made at Dundee in the year 1598, but one out of the bounds of one Presbyterie, and having commission. No moe Commissioners from burghs, except Edinburgh, should be admitted but one, according to the said act, nor moe ministers than thrie out of a Presbyterie ; yet here moe were admitted, yea six or seven out of one Presbyterie, as, for example, out of Auchterarder Presby terie,* by the Bishop of Dumblane, Mr Adam BeUenden, his con voy. Some Moderators of Presbyteries voted without commission * Mr Andrew Allan and Mr James Burdoun were only chosen Commissioners for the Presbytery of Auchterarder ; yet Mr Adam Bannatyne or Ballenden, .Bishop of Dumblane, added seven or eight to them. Calderwood's History, vol. vii. p. 333. 264 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION from their Presbyteries, under colour of a forged cEuse foisted into an act of a pretended Assembly, holden at LinUthgow in the year 1606, and against the order estabUshed in AprUe 1582, when it was thought expedient, that Presbyteries should not be astricted to direct their Moderators in commission to the GeneraU Assem blies. Farther, It is true the Moderators of the Presbyteries were then of another stamp ; viz. the Bishops substitutes according to the act of Glasgow ; at which tyme the constant Moderators were continued only to the nixt Diocesian Synod, where the Bishops were to appoint their substitutes ; and by the Assembly holden at LinUthgow 1608, they were continued only for an interim to the nixt Assembly, which was that holden at Glasgow. But suppose they were the same, and of the same sort, yet what have we to do to acknowledge either LinUthgow or Glasgow AssembUes ? It ap peareth, then, that if none had voted except such as had commis sion, the sincerer sort had prevaiUed, and, consequently, we may inferr, that the Assembly of Perth, consisting of lawfuU members, rejected the Five Articles. Fourth, Those that voted affirmative, having commission, either had their commission procured, or were the King's pensioners, or looked for some benefice, or were won with the promise of augmentation of their stipends, or had sub scribed some articles in privat, or were circumveened with pro mises made to them, that they should not be urged with the prac tice, if they wold only consent to please the King. Some confessed they, assented not simpliciter, but to avert the wrath of authority. Some were threatened by their owne Diocesian Bishop in private with deposition, namely by Bishop Cowper. Some were twice caUed upon, after the interjection of other names, as though they had not answered the first tyme, and so votted twice. Many had voted already for the Articles in Private Conference. Necessity of yeeld- ing was enforced upon no lesse danger than the wrath of authority, " imprisonment, exile, utter subversion of the estate and order of this Kirk. Such as had courage to speak were checked, rebuked, in terrupted, threatened. Yea, it was plainly professed, that neither reasoning nor the number should carry the matter away ; so, sup- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 265 pose such as had commission had prevaiUed in number, their affir mative votes should not be regarded. Fifth, Notwithstanding that it was craved that the Articles might be put in vote severally, because some, perhaps, might vote for one, who might have voted against the rest, yet were aU the Five offered, or rather obtruded to voting at once. He that denyed one was to be repute as if he had denyed aU. Sixth, The Bishops, and some others, had practised before in the King's ChappeU, and, therefor, ought to be secluded from voting, suppose there had been no other exception against thenu Seeing we have here made mention of some Articles presented to Ministers to be subscribed at their entry, I have here subjoined the Articles wherewith a brother * was urged at his entrie. " I, A. B., now to be admitted to the ministrie of C, faithfully promise, and solemnly swear, by thir presents, to observe and ful- fiU the Articles and Conditions foUowing : they are to say, " 1. That I shaU be leUl and true to my most gracious soveraigne the King's Majestie, and his successors, and, to my power, shaU mantaine his Highnesse right and prerogative in causes ecclesias ticaU. " 2. That I shaU be obedient to my Ordinar, the .... and to aU superiors in the Church, speak of them reverenthe, and in aU private and pubUct prayers, commend them and their estates to God's mercifull protection. " 3. That I shaU in aU places, by conference, and where I shaU have occasion in pubhck preaching, mantaine the present govern ment of the Kirk, and jurisdiction EpiscopaU ; and shaU, by read ing, be carefuU to informe myselfe, to the end I may stand for the same against aU adversaries opposit to the same. " 4. That I shaU be diligent, to my power, in the duties of my caUing, be resident with my flock, and not divert therefrom with out the Ucence of my Ordinar. " 5. That I shall study to advance the state of the Kirk in gene- * Mr Alexander Martin. 266 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION rail, and, particularly, the estate of the Kirk of C, whereunto I am to be receaved, in aU profits and commodities I can. " 6. That I shah live a peaceable minister in the Kirk, subject ing myself to the orders that therein are, or, by the consent of the said Church, shall be {lawfully) established; and by all means that I can use, procure others, to the due reverence of the same. " Which things if I contraveen, (as God forbid), I am content, upon tryaU and cognition taken by my said Ordinar, without aU reclamation or gainsaying, to be deprived of my ministerie, and to be reput and holden a perjured and infamous person for ever. " Subscribed with my hand, at," &c. The word lawfully in the sixth Article was not insert in the principali which was to be subscribed, as that brother assured me. There is no law, civill or ecclesiasticaU, ordaining any such Arti cles to be subscribed at their entry, either to their offices or bene fices. But after this Assembly, Conformity to the Acts of Perth was comprehended in the Articles which ministers were urged to sub scribe. The Bishops formed the Articles which were to be sub scribed diversely, as it pleased them to deaU hardly or more fa vourably with the intrants ; but none were devised whereby they were not entangled one way or another. Upon the 20th of October the Acts of Perth Assembly were ratified ; and the ratification was proclamed at the mercat croce of Edinburgh : An act for commemoration of Christ's birth, passion, resurrection, ascension, and sending down of the Holy Ghost, upon the dayes appointed for that use : An Act anent the administration of baptisme in private houses, when necessity shaU requyr : An Act anent the catechizing of young chUdren of eight years of age, and presenting them to the Bishop to lay hands on them, and to blesse them with prayer, for the increase of their knowledge, and in con tinuance of God's heavenly graces with them : An Act anent the administration and giving the holy Communion in private houses to sick and infirme persons : An Act that the blessed Sacrament of the holy Communion of the body and blood of Christ be celebrate to the people, humbly and reverently kneeUing on their knees. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 267 These are the words of the proclamation ; but the Reader may see the Acts sett downe in ample forme in their ratification at the Par hament holden anno 1621. Farther, An Act of restraint of Simon- aicaU pactions in the entry of ministers, ordaining that every mi nister shaU, before his admission and coUation by the Ordinar, swear the oath contained in the said Act. But the power of collation was not granted to the pretended Bishops by the Act of Glasgow ; an Act giving Commission to certain persons therein mentioned to revise the labour of those to whom commission was given in the Assembly of Aberdeen for revising the Book of Common Prayers, and collecting the cannons of Church disciphne ; and as they find the same worthie to be aUowed, to take order for approbation and pubUshing thereof. But, so farr as I understand, there passed only a ratification of the Catechisme aUowed in Aberdeen. The King and the Lords of the Secret Counsell ratified, aUowed, approved and confirmed the acts above mentioned, in aU and sundry points, clauses, heads, articles and conditions, and ordained the same to have the strength and force of lawes in aU tyme coming : And, in speciaU, that there be a cessation and abstinence from aU labour and handie-work upon the fyve dayes above mentioned, which are appointed to be dedicated to God's service, to the effect that the subjects may the better attend upon the holy exercises which are to be keept in aU kirks at these tymes. After this Assembly, the Bishops urged ministers with obedience to the Acts of Perth Assembly, especiaUy to the Acts of the obser vation of holy dayes, and kneeUing at the receaving the sacra mentaU elements of the supper. But the greatest part of the mi nistery wold not acknowledge Perth Assembly to be lawfuU, nor give obedience to these Acts. The ministers of Edinburgh, espe cially Mr Patrick GaUoway and Mr Wilham Struthers, enveighed against the people for the rarity of their hearers upon Christmasse day 1618 ; and as great heat arose betwixt them and the Session of their kirk, when they urged the elders and deacons to serve at the tables, when the Communion was to be celebrate at Easter 1619, they delated their flock to the King, whereupon the King 2 68 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION sent a sharp rebuke to the Magistrates and CounseU of the towne. In their letter they did what they could to incense the King, and let him understand that he had as great advantage against the Towne of Edinburgh as he had the 17th of December. But when they were challenged, they denyed stiffely that they had sent any hard information to the King. But in July 1619, the controversie was taken up between them and the Magistrates, by the pretended Bishop of St Andrews, and the President, Secretarie HamUton, * at the Kirk's direction. To aUure many to come to the Kirk, they offered them hbertie to sit, stand or kneeU, as they pleased ; but few were then moved with the offer ; howbeit, by processe of tyme, many have been drawn to communicate with them. Cold and gracelesse were their Communions; few were the communi cants, but rare was the number of kneeUers. And since the first breaking off, the number of communicants hath increased, to the great grief of the better sort. But the number of kneeUers have decreased; neither are the communicants like to be urged with kneeUing, tiU a greater number of communicants be drawne in. It is lamentable to see that holy action so profaned, where the former order of administration was changed ; the distractions be twixt the ministers and the people, kneeUers and sitters, commu nicants, and such as wold not communicat, (not without great reason), with the kneeUing communicants. Mr John HaU craved to be dismissed with the King's favour, pretending his age and infirmity of body, but in truth to hve at ease and lazily upon the pension he had of the King, for his good service in former tymes. So he left his ministrie in Edinburgh without the people's consent, and when there was no sensible decay perceived in his gifts. Mr Richard Dickson was cited to compear before the High Commission in March 1619, to answer for not celebrating the Com munion conforme to the Act of Perth, condemning in speciaU the act of kneeUing, and inhibiting the people to kneeU. Without any * Sir Thomas Hamilton (then Lord Binning) had been appointed President of the Court of Session in June 1616. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 269 long processe he was deprived, and ordained to enter his person in waird in Dumbarton, where he was detained some years, but was never suffered to return to his own flock. Mr Thomas Hogg, minister at Dysert, was summoned to com pear before the High Commission, the 13th of Aprile 1619, for impugning, in his course of exercise, the Five Articles concluded at Perth. He refused to answer to that judicatorie for his doc trine. Bishop Spottswood wUled him to advise, whether he wold conforme to the Articles ; but he answered, He was resolved. He was caUed again before them upon the 22d of Aprile. The Bishop laid to his charge sundry speeches he had uttered against the Estate of Bishops. After he had answered, the Bishop offered to provide him to the first vacant place in his diocie, because he was meanly provided in Dysert, if he wold not meddle with their Estate hereafter. But he refused the offer or to make any such bargain. Bishop Law was appointed to conferr with him. When he had said that they must answer before the Judge of Heaven, who had a higher commission, Bishop Law answered, " It is lang to that day, and ye must suffer in the mean tyme." After he was caUed in again, they suspended him from his ministrie, ordained him to go to Orkney within the space of fortie days, to be confyned there during the King's pleasure and wiU. He appealed to the judgment of a lawful General Assembly, by reason the particulars upon which they grounded their sentence were not UbeUed in the summons, but only aUeged by St Andrews. Sundry speeches past betwixt him and sundry of the Bishops, which I am forced to pretermitt in this abridgment. St Andrews caused summons him to compear before the nixt Diocesian Synod, to hear and see himself deprived for obstinat rejecting the Articles of Perth. But he compeared not, understanding that the Bishop proceeded in the Diocesian Synod as he pleased. Thereupon he was deprived. Mr Andrew Duncan, minister at CarraUl, one of the six minis ters condemned at Linlithgow and banished, but suffered, upon earnest entreaty, to returne, was cited likewise to compear before the High Commission. He declined at the first diet, and stood 270 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION to his declinature at the second diet. The High Commission proceeded to sentence of deprivation, and ordained him to enter in waird at Dundee. After the sentence was pronounced he gave in this admonition following : — " Now, seeing I have done nothing in this bussinesse whereof I have been accused by you, but have been serving Christ Jesus, my Master, in rebuking vice in simpUcity and uprightnesse of heart, I protest (seeing ye have done me this wrong), for a remedy at God the righteous Judge his hands, to whom vengeance belongeth, and who wiU repay and summonds you before bis dreadfuU judg ment-seat, to be censured and punished for such unrighteous deaU ing at such time as his Majesty shaU think expedient ; and in the mean tyme declyne this your judgment simpliciter now as of befor, and appeaU to the ordinary GeneraU Assembly of the Kirk, for the reasons before produced in write. Pitie yourselves, for the Lord's sake ; lose not your own dear souls ; lose them not, I beseech you, for Esau's pottage. Remember Balaam who was cast away by the deceit of the wages of unrighteousness ; and forget not how miserably Judas lost himself for ever, for a triffle of money that never did him good. Fye on back and beUy that destroyeth the soul ! Better be pyned to dead for hunger than for a Uttle peltrie of the earth to perish for ever, and never be recovered so long as the days of heaven shaU last, and the years of etemitie shaU endure. Should ye be the burriers of your brethren, the sons and servants of the Christ Jesus ? This doing is not the doing of the shepherds of the flock of Christ Jesus. If ye wUl not regard your soul nor conscience, look, I beseech you, to your fame. Why wUl ye be miserable both in this hfe and in the hfe to come ?" The pretended Bishop called a number of ministers to a meeting in St Andrews, upon the 23d of November 1619, without the King's knowledge, as they aUedged ; but the King, being certified of their intention, had sent the Lord Scoone to be present, and, with him, his letter for declaration of Iris pleasure. They were drawn only to a meeting or conference ; but, by their expectation, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 271 Scoone was sent to threaten them, and to present the King's rigo rous letter. Spotswood professed, that, for his particular, he could be contented that the Kirk of Scotland wanted those things. " But seeing," saith he, " his Majesty doth urge them, and that, without his displeasure, he could not tolerate your refusaU any longer, the things themselves being indifferent, and now estabUshed by an act of the Kirk, ye must not think that we mean to suffer in this cause with you, although ye should incur great troubles hereafter ; for I wUl preferr unity in the Kirk before your chUdren, wives and estates ; and what his Majestie's expresse command is, ye shaU hear by his owne letter." The King's letter to the Bishops was read, commanding them, as they wold be answerable to him, to de pose aU those that refuse to conforme, without respect of persons, no wayes regarding the multitude of the rebeUious ; for if there be not a sufficient number to fill their places, he would send them mi nisters out of England. Spottiswood craved the advice of the Bishops and some others. Mr John CarmichaeU, giving his advice, answered, That suppose the things urged were indifferent, yet it hath been the judgment of famous divines, that those who agree in the foundation, should bear one with another in things indiffe rent. He remembered to this purpose, the speech of Hermannus to Cassander : " Et tunc audeas eos in exilium ire jubere, propter rituum et consuetudinum diversitatem, qui una vobiscum in praecipuis Chris- tianae religionis capitibus consentiunt ?" And Wachan, [Vaughan,] Bishop of London, his words to himselfe : " E I were charged, upon an oath," saith he, " I would take mine oath, that the Kirk of Eng land might weeU want these ceremonies ; and that, seeing we hold them indifferent, and our brethren hold them unlawfuU, we are bound to bear with them." He aUedged, likewise, that diverse brethren in England have been tolerat to their dyeing day, though different in practice. Seven were appointed for either syde to conferr the day follow ing. They began with cursorie vehtations ; whereupon Mr John CarmichaeU desyred, if they would have matters ftdly reasoned, that they might agree upon some solid course. His desyre was, 272 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION that they might reason by writ. This was refused, and the act of the Assembly was stUl urged. He answered, " I pray you presse us no more with that act ; if ye presse us, ye wiU provoke us to utter that which wiU discontent you. First, The Bishop of Aberdeen had confessed, that if the brethren had been faithfully dealt with, they had not won so many to their side." Nixt, He al- ledged the promise made by Spottiswood at Perth, that it should not be a snare to the Kirk afterward ; and that, therefore, he de syred the brethren only to give way for the present, for the King's satisfaction. 3. He aUedged the act was not conceaved in the terms of law, " We ordaine ;" but only in these words, " It seem- eth meet or convenient ;" and that one of the Bishops came to some of them standing togither, and said, " See how we have sett downe this act of geniculation in words, which may give the King contentment, yet such as may not enforce a law to be a snare unto the brethren." Farther, he assured the Bishops, if they straitened them with an act, they wold make known to the world how that act was drawn on, upon what promises and conditions it was con veyed, and after what manner it was enacted. And whereas they caU these things indifferent, he hoped, by the grace of God, to make manifest to the world, both by word and write, that these things were not indifferent, but simply unlawfuU. Bishop Law replyed, to the manner of enacting, that they did imitate therein the Apostles decree. Mr John rejoined, That the Apostles words were not only, That it seemeth meet to the Kirk, but also to the Holy Ghost ; and therefore their decree did bind jure divino. But when ordinary office-bearers meeting in an Assembly say, " It seemeth good unto them," it is but their particular judgment, and bindeth not obedience to the act, which was urged by Scoon. A new meeting was appointed ; but the ministers compeared not. A number of Ministers were summoned to compear before the High Commission, upon the 26th of January and 21st of February 1620, and were urged to conforme at the nixt Easter, and cele brate the Communion according to the act of Perth, with certi fication of deprivation ; but they celebrated, notwithstanding, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 273 according to the laudable forme estabUshed and receaved by our Kirk. Mr John Scrimgeor, minister at Kinghorn, was cited to com pear before the High Commission, which was to sitt upon the 1st of March in Edinburgh. When he compeared, he was urged to conforme to the Act of Perth in the ministration of the Sacraments and observation of holy dayes. Some velitation between him and some of the Bishops passed upon these two points, and upon the resort of people out of other paroches to his Communion. He was removed and caUed in again. Spottiswood intimate to him, that he was deprived of aU function within the Kirk, and was ordain ed, within six dayes, to enter Dundee, to be confyned there. He [Scrimgeour] chaUenged them for their suddentie, before they had heard what he had to say, and desyred to be farther heard. He caUed to remembrance his advice he gave at a Synod in Dysert, where sundry of the Lords of the CounseU, and Mr James Nicol son, were present, What was the meetest way to pacifie the troubles of the Kirk, to procure honour and soundest contentment to his Majesty : which was, to regard ministers as his naturaU and loyaU subjects, giving them the common benefit of the law of the land ; to deaU with them by reason, and not to force them to any point brevi manu; for they are men of judgment, and so esteemed in the countrey ; brought up at the schooles ; could rea son, and give an account of their doings ; but to force them with violence of horning, wairding, depriving, what honor to the King, or credit to them ? for in aU their sufferings they wold be the more confident : that the Lords present, and Mr James promised it should be so in tyme coming : that Mr James was of that same judgment with himselfe, concerning the English conformity, the King's su premacie, and the Episcopacie. He referred to witnesses, what was ¦ his judgment before his death, and his grief for that which he saw then approaching. He putt the Bishops there present in remem brance, how, at the Assembly holden at Dundee, and after at Montrose, it was pretended a benefit to the Kirk, to have some men of wisdome endued with competent - rents knowne to his s 271 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Majestie, and so, having accesse to deall with him for the comfort and benefit of the brethren ; for planting of kirks, providing of benefices, &c. : How, notwithstanding, some brethren suspected and feared this Episcopacie and English conformity ; with what protestations and oaths such intentions were denyed; and these brethren blamed, and hardly used for giving wairning. " How wisely they suspected," [he said] " and what was meant, indeed, is now manifest. Suppose, I pray you, it had been said to you then, ' Sirs, the tyme will come ye wUl sitt as great Lords, clothed with strange authority, caU and conveen, judge and condenme your faithfull brethren, cast them out of their ministery, and expose them to the uttermost contempt of the world, for not kneeUing at the Communion, for not keeping YuUle ;' what wold ye have answered ? Remember, likewise, under what blame ye bring this Kirk, even to be repulsed by aU the Kirks in Europe, for incon- stancie and faUing from our profession. We were in a most happie unity tUl ye separated yourselves from us ; and yet ye wiU justify yourselves and your proceedings against us, condemn e us as sedi tious, disobedient, disloyaU, proud, fooUsh, such as stand for trifles with so gracious a Prince, that please and foUow the fooUsh mul titude, seeking praise to ourselves. We cannot be sUent, being so hardly used, both by word and by deed. We are forced to plead against you, and to proclaime to the world, that some of our number, baited with the honor and profit of the world, ambitious men, worldlings, men-pleasers, have start from us, and execute aU vio lence and iniquity against us." " Ye sett out pamphlets against us," said Spottiswood, " and darr not avouch them." " That is because of your violence," said Mr John, " otherwise we may avouch them before the whole world. I appeaU you before the Lord Jesus, as ye shaU answer to him in the day of visitation, if you hope to have comfort for that ye have cast out Mr John-) Scrimgeor and others, out of the Lord's vineyaird, as idle and eviU workmen, and if then, the favour of men may ease you." " That will not do your turn nor help you," said Spottiswood. Cowper, Bishop of Galloway, said to him, " Ye are wiUfuU, and wiU keep a OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 275 schisme in the kirk." He answered, " Ye do wrong to alledge so ; ye shaU not be able to acquyt yourselves of schisme ; we walked aU soundly in the truth; ye have leapt from us; ye make a schisme." " I grant we were weeU," said Spottiswood, " if it had pleased the King, who must be obeyed ; and when it shaU please his Majesty, I shaU returne to my former course." He answered, " He is wise that is weU, and can hold himself so ; if we were weeU before, the change must be eviU. I have had some tyme and place to conferre with his Majesty anent the interest of the matters of God, and professed that Christ was the Sovereigne, and only director of his house : And I could, (I may say truely), have climmed up to these preferements. I request you to be more favourable interpreters of his Majesty's mind towards us, your brethren, than thus to expose us to contempt, and other inconve niences." " I tell you," said Mr Spottiswood, " the King is Pope now, and so shall be." " That is an evU stile ye give him," said Mr John. Then he gave in the reasons foUowing, to stay the sentence : — " 1. The reason of the censure being taken from Perth Assem bly, put the case, it were lawful, yet the Act of geniculation was in forma consilii et non prmcepti. Traditio Ecclesiastica, sub forma consilii, et non prwcepti, libera esse dicitur. "2. It was plainly protested, that what was consented unto was only done to give his Majesty satisfaction, and not to snare any brethren. " 3. The reason aUedged for geniculation was the pretence of prayer, yet it is left free to stand or sitt at prayer : Ergo, Much more should the other be free. " 4. The Assembly setteth down no expresse forme of ministra tion of the Lord's Supper, or observation of holy days, at least, no warrand for any forme practised where alteration hath taken place. Neither is there any warrantable forme directed or approven by the Kirk, besydes that which is extant in print before the Psalme Book ; according to which, as I have always done, so now, I minis ter that sacrament. s2 276 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION " 5. The said Assembly, having only and properly power, to appoint convenient censures against the contraveeners of their owne acts and constitutions, have left the same free of aU sanction or pain, generaU, or particular. Likeas, many of the affirmative votters have solemnly declared, that if they had known any hard censure to have past thereupon, they had never votted to any such constitution. " 6. According to the rule, ' Ejusdem est exequi, cujus est con- dere,' it hath been the custome of aU lawfuU CounseUs, and invio- lablie observed by the GeneraU Assembly of Scotland, that they, in their meetings, have execute their owne acts ; or, as occasion hath requyred, have committed the execution of the same to certaine Commissioners authorized to that effect, Presbyteries or Pro vinciaU Assemblies, and have never given place to that PapaU pride : Ad Canonum virtutem, ordinem, interpretationem, dispensa- tionem, fyc, requiritur Papa ; ad infallibilitatem decisionis requiritur, Consilium. "7. As there is no censure ecclesiasticaU appointed in the cases above specified, so there is no Act of Parhament ordaining punish ment for the aUedged transgressions hbeUed ; but, by the contrare, diverse Acts of Parliament, aUowing and commanding his High nesse subjects of this kingdome, to receave the sacraments after the manner observed by us. " 8. The constitutions of this Kirk, in their due tenor and fuU extent, viz., anent the conclusion of a particular matter ; the pe- naltie against the controveeners of that conclusion and execution thereof, properly proceed from one and the same authority, viz., of lawfull consent of authorized Commissioners orderly mett for holding an Assembly. Neither is there any lawfuU power besydes them, for making, establishing, and executing constitutions of that kind ; much lesse may, or should some few of the number, after -3 the dissolving of the GeneraU Assembly, eek, alter, impare, or presume to execute their acts without their own warrant. " 9. As I have receaved my ministery by the lawfuU order of this Kirk, and by solemne oath and promise, given at my admis- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 277 sion, have submitted myself to the GeneraU and ProvinciaU As sembUes and Presbyteries, as judges ordinary, to aUow my pro ceedings, or correct my faults, if any be, &c. : so I stand most humbly submitted to his Majesty and the said Assembhes respec tive, and of reason ought to be judged by no other in the particu lar lybeUed." As for the seventh reason, howbeit it aggredgeth their iniquity for the tyme, yet it was of no lesse force after, it being supposed that the Assembly at Perth was not a lawfuU GeneraU Assembly, nor the Act agreeable to the Word of God, which no Parliament can rectify by their ratification, farr lesse the Parhament foUowing as it proceeded, as ye shaU see anone. Spottiswood, after he had read the Reasons, said to him, " Take up your Reasons again : E ye wUl not conforme, I cannot help it. The King must be obeyed. My Lords have given sentence and will stand to it." " Ye cannot deprive me of my ministerie," answered Mr John : " I receaved it not from you, but from the whole Synod of Fife ; and for any thing ye do, I wUl never think myselfe deposed." " Indeed, (said Bishop Spottiswood), I wiU be a Papist in that. The order of the ministerie hath character indele- bilis; ye are only discharged of the present exercise of it. When ever it shaU please the King, ye may use it againe without any new imposition of hands." Mr John wished to be transported, if the nearnesse of Kinghom to Edinburgh did offend. The Bishop answered, " That cannot be granted now, but afterward, upon your good behaviour." Then he in the protestation following said : — " I protest before the Lord Jesus, that I get manifest wrong ; my reasons and aUegations are not considered, nor answered. I attest you to answer before his glorious appearance for this, and such violent and wrong deaUing, in oppressing me thus malici ously and fraudulently ; and protest plainly, my cause should have been heard as I pleaded, and stUl plead ; and chaUenge exceptionem fori ad legitimum forum et judicem. Likeas, I appeall to the Lord Jesus, his eternal Word, the King my dread Soveraigne his laws, 278 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION the constitutions of this Kirk and Kingdom, the CounseUs and Assemblies of both ; and protest, that I stand minister of the EvangeU, and only by violence am thrust from the same." The only favour he obtained was to be confyned in BowhUl, a little roome of his owne ; but he took greater liberty thereafter. * A number of ministers in the Merce were cited to compear be fore the High Commission upon the 2d of March 1620; but hef could not obtain so much of them as to make the table short, and to give the elements out of their own hands. They were dismissed with admonition to be quiet, and not to hinder others who had promised, sworne, and subscribed. Upon Tuesday, the 28th of March, Mr James Law, Bishop of Glasgow, assisted with the Bishops of Argyle, GaUoway, Dum blane, Doctor Whitfoord, minister at Moffet, Doctor Hay, minis ter at Peebles, Messrs Thomas Muirhead, James HamUton, Archi bald HamUton, David Sharp, DanieU Cunninghame, held a Court of High Commission in Glasgow. Mr WiUiam Livingstoun, minis ter at Lanerk, Mr John Ferguson, minister at Oclultree, were cited to compear before them. Mr WUUam Livingston aUedged he was cited upon the Saturday, and, therefore, in respect of his sermons, had not tyme to advyse upon the lybeU. They urged him, notwithstanding, with obedience to the Articles. He re fused to have ado with them, or their course. They urged him to take a tyme to advise. He refused, because he doubted not, and would not weaken others by bis dissembling. When they urged him with the authority of Perth Assembly, he an swered, " That he was not bound to do good for that Assem bly, much lesse to do evUl ; he wold do good because it is good, ' and not for that Assembly." When Bishop Law asked, What he had to object against that Assembly, he answered, "It was neither free, nor full, nor formaU ; it consisted not of such as had "* power to enact. I thank God I saw it, and the proceedings of it. * That is, he continued preaching at Kingliorn, notwithstanding the sentence of the High Commission. t The Bishop of St Andrews. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 279 LawfuU Commissioners were neglected, and others were admitted to vote who had not commission." The Bishop seemed to take no notice of such speeches. When they proceed to the sentence of deposition or confyning, he answered, That their sentence pro ceeded not from a just power, nor was given for a lawfuU cause, nor the processe deduced after a right manner; and gave his reasons, which are expressed in his dechnature. Mr John Fergu son, after some speeches past betwixt him and them, declyned likewise, and told them they must be answerable to God, how they dealt with him. Glasgow answered, " We wiU be doing in the meantime." Mr John professed plainely he would not acknowledge their deposition, but would teach as long as any would hear him. As for his wairding, he acknowledged the King's power over his person. At the entreaty of some, he got ease of the place of his confyning, to wit, Perth. Mr William Livingstoun should have been confyned in Minnie Abbey; [but] went home to his owne flock. The coppie of the Dechnature given in by them severaUy foUoweth : — " In respect the fault lybeUed concerneth my office of my minis terie, which I receaved by the lawfuU order of this Kirk ; and by solemne oath and promise given at my admission, have submitted myself to the GeneraU and ProvinciaU AssembUes and Presby teries, as judges ordinary, either to aUow my proceedings, or to correct my faults ; I stand most humbly submitted to his Majesty and the said Assemblyes respective, and, by reason, ought to be judged by no others in the particulars lybeUed. Therefore, seeing it hath been the custome of aU lawfull CounseUs, and inviolablie observed in the GeneraU Assemblies of the Kirk of Scotland, that they in their meetings have execute their owne acts, or committed the execution thereof to certain Commissioners : And seeing the aUedged acts containe no paine, or hard censure to follow there upon, neither hath the Assembly given power to Commissioners to execute these acts ; neither is there any Act of Parliament, or- dainino- punishment for the aUedged transgressions lybeUed, but by the contrary, allowing and commanding his Highnesse' s sub- 280 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION jects of this kingdome to preach and receave the sacrament, after the manner observed by us : Notwithstanding whereof, the lybeU threatens, not only deprivation from aU function of the ministerie, but also punishment by other censures and pains that may be im posed by vertue of the High Commission : Farther, his Majesty and Three Estates, (James VI., ParUament 8, Act 131), discharg- eth aU judgments or jurisdictions, spirituaU or temporaU, which are not approven by his Majesty and Three Estates conveened in Par liament, and decerneth the same to cease, tUl the nature thereof be first seen and considered by his Highnesse, and the said Three Estates, conveened in Parliament, as said is, and be aUowed and ratifyed by them : Certifying them that shaU proceed in using and executing of the said judgments and jurisdictions, or in obeying the same, not being aUowed and ratified, as said is, they shaU be repute, holden, caUed, pursued, and punished as usurpers and contemners of his Highnesse's authority, for example to others : And true it is, that this Commission was not approved in Parha ment, notwithstanding interveened since it was first used: There fore, whatsoever censure ye may inflict for useing, I wiU not in- curr the like for obeying. For the reasons foresaids, and others to be eeked, if need be, I decline the said High Commission, as no wayes competent judges in the caise above specifyed ; and hum bly submitt myselfe to be judged by the laws of the GeneraU Assembly." Mr Robert Scot was continued tUl after Easter. Directions were sent downe from the King in the beginning of Aprile 1620, to confyne certaine citizens of Edinburgh for assist ing refractorie ministers in their disobedience, accompanying them when they were to compear before the High Commission, thereby encourageing them to stand out against the orders of the Kirk, in contempt of authority. Whereupon the persons foUowing, nomi nat in the King's letter, were charged upon the 25th of AprUe, to enter to their severaU wairds or confynement, without citation, tryaU, or conviction before the Counsell, only for satisfaction to his Majesty : William Eigg and James Cathkin, to addresse them- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 281 selves to Cathnesse, within the space of thirty dayes ; Richard Lawson, to Aberdeen; John Meen, to Wigtoun, within twenty dayes ; Thomas Eigles, (mistaken for John Ingles), to the burgh of Montrose ; Robert Meiklejohn, to the city of Dunkelden, within fifteen dayes; and to keep waird within the bounds limited to them, and no wayes to transcend the said bounds, without the King's speciaU warrand had and obtained thereto, under the pain of rebeUion. There was no pretended cause against Robert Meikle john, but that he sat the year preceeding, when Mr Patrick Gal loway dehvered to him the elements, whereby it seemeth that Mr Patrick put him in this roU. The CounseU of the towne inter- ceeded with the Bishop of St Andrews for them ;. so the execution was superseded tiU July. Bishop Spottiswood held a Diocesian Synod upon the 25th of Aprile. He threatened to cause the Conforme ministers censure those that were Not Conforme ; but those who wold not conforme went out of the Assembly, except seven or eight, after they had answered to their names. For a terror to this Synod, he had de prived, in the court of High Commission, in the week preceeding, Doctor Barclay of the exercise of preaching within the diocie of St Andrews ; confyned Mr David Mearnes, minister at Carnbie in his own paroch, with certification of deprivation, in caise he resolved not, betwixt and Martimasse, to minister the Communion according to the Act of Perth. Mr William Arskine was ordained to be con fyned in Angus. Upon the 19th of June 1620, new intimation was made, by pro clamation of the King's wUl, and pleasure, concerning obedience to be given to the Acts of Perth Assembly, especiaUy the Acts con cerning the fyve dayes, and the receiving of the Communion, under the pain of suspension, deprivation, confyning or wairding of mi nisters and penalties prescribed for professors according to their qualities and degrees. In the beginning of July, WiUiam Rigg and John Meen were charged de novo, to enter into their confyments ; but, after entreaty, the Bishop wrote to the Counsell in their favours. 282 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION In the beginning of May or end of AprUe [1621,] the subjects were warned, by proclamation, to give in what sutes, articles, or petitions they had to propone to the ParUament, to the Clerk of Register, before the 20th day of May, that by him they may be presented to so many of the CounseU as were appointed by his Majesty to meet some dayes before the ParUament, with certifica tion the same shaU not be receaved, read nor votted in ParUa ment, unlesse they be passed under his Highnesse hand. AU other corporations or private persons, as they had to do in Parha ment, keept their ordinary meetings, according to their wonted priviledges, to prepare their petitions and articles. But that liberty which ministers wont to have of a GeneraU Assembly, to send Commissioners with articles to the Estates conveened in Parliament, was denyed to them, not only now, but at other Parhaments preceeding ; therefore some ministers aggreed upon a Supplication, which was presented by Mr Andrew Duncan in their name to Sir George Hay, Clerk of Register. In this supplication which, in the fuU tenor, is sett downe in " The Course of Conformity," they humbly desyre, in the name of this Kirk, that the Estates would interceed at his Majesties hands, That — " A sufficient and ready execution of former Acts of Parhament made against the fearfuU blasphemie of God's name, profaneing of the Lord's Day, and contempt of his Sanctuary and Service, so universaUy overflowing in this land, not only in the persons of poor ignorants, in a manner tyed to those horrible crymes by a cursed custome, and beggarly necessity ; but even in the more honourable sort, whose damnable exemple encourages their foUowers to sin without fear ; with such additions as may represse and restraine these crying abominations in aU, without respect of persons. " A safe liberty to enjoy the profession of our reUgion, as it is reformed in doctrine, sacraments and discipline, and hath been openly professed, sworne and practised by Prince, pastors, and people of all ranks, your predecessors of worthy memory, yourselves, and vvc all yet living, these threescore years bygone and above. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 283 " A fuU deUverance from and a sufficient defence against all no vations and novelties in Doctrine, Sacraments and DiscipUne ; and especially such as, by constitutions of the Kirk, Confessions of Faith, hberal lawes of the country, oaths and subscriptions, and long continued practice, hath been condemned and cast out, as idle rites and Romish formahties, under whatsoever pretence they plead for re-entrie. " That no Act passe in derogation and prejudice of the acts afready granted in favour of Reformation, Uberty of Assembhes, convenient execution of DiscipUne, &c; or for corroboration of new opinions, against the same, whether Episcopacy, or ceremonies, the shaddow thereof, which for the peace of the Kirk should be rejected by heavenly wisdome, rather than ratified. " That aU Ministers that are removed from their charges be re stored to their places, functions and stipends. " The happinesse to Uve under his Majesty and his heirs, ordi nary judges and rulers appointed by lawes and customs, and esta blished by the Acts of Parhament. That our cause be lawfuUy cog nosced, according to order and justice, before any sentence passe against our persons, places and estates ; and not to be judged by any judicatory forreigne, and not estabUshed by the lawes of the countrey." The Clerk of Register with great difficultie was entreated to receave the Supphcation. When he receaved it, subscribed by the presenter, he professed he doubted whether he would exhibit it to the ParUament or not. The King's great Commissioner, the Marquesse of Hamilton, after he came from Court, had his first meeting in private with the Officers of Estate and some others. They consulted how to prevent and stop all opposition at the ensueing Parliament against the rati fication of Perth Assembly and Acts thereof. The Parliament was prorogate from the 23d of July 1621 to the 25th, that the Bishops and other agents for the King might have tyme to deaU with Noblemen and Commissioners. They tryed their inclination, and as they found them affected wrought upon them to be present or 284 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION absent, or to resolve wisely against the day appointed, speciaUy such as had broken estates. Those whom they feared most, they would have had them to believe that opposition was needlesse : Therefore some dispairing, cryed out, " Our opposition wiU do us evU, and the cause no good." Others, of a more servUe and base spirit, resolved to follow the multitude, and the mightie. Some noblemen obtained hcence to returne home, which was easily granted. Upon the 22d of July, Mr Alexander Simpson, minister at Merton, preaching in the Grayfrier Kirk, spared neither King, Bishops nor Ministers. He and Mr Andrew Duncan, presenter of the supplication above mentioned, were apprehended the day foUow ing by the captain of the guard, and presented before the CounseU. Mr Alexander conceaUed nothing of that which he had said, and spared not to caU the Bishops, in their face, "beUy-gods," and " enemies to the Kirk of Christ," and denounced the judgments of God against them if they repented not. The Bishops wold have had him pubhckly punished. Some bade hang him to be a terror to the rest ; others, better acquaint with his resolutenesse to suffer, advised them to take a calmer course. So he and Mr Andrew, who was chaUenged for presenting the Supphcation, were, at the appoint ment of the Counsell, convoyed by the guard to Dumbarton; where they were detained till October foUowing, and then presented be fore the Counsell. Mr Alexander was confyned in his owne paroch ; Mr Andrew Duncan in KiUrinnie. The weeU affected ministers who were conveened out of aU the quarters of the countrey, directed, upon the 23d of July, eight or nine of their number to the Commissioners of Burrows, to request them to stand to the purity of the truth and hberty of the GospeU. They receaved fair words, but litle performance, at that Parlia ment. One of Bishop Spottiswood's domesticks who was present, informed the Bishop ; the Bishop informed the CounseU. Upon this pretence, and upon the pretence of the preaching dehvered by Mr Alexander, the ministers were charged to depart off the towne within twenty-four hours after the charge, except the ordinary OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 285 ministers of Edinburgh, and such others as, upon notoriety of their lawfuU affairs, wold procure a warrant from the Ordinar, and, fail- Ung him, from one of the Archbishops ; but the true cause was, lest they staying, should procure opposition to the ratification of the Acts. Other subjects that had to do in that High Court of Parliament, were suffered to repair and remaine in the burgh. The Bishops were bound by the Caveats to do nothing in Parha ment without advice and consent of the General Assembly ; but they laboured by aU means that there should be no GeneraU As sembly. Yea, howbeit in the ParUament preceeding, when the union of kirks and modification of stipends were to be treated, they invited and desired promiscuously, ministers to come and assist them with their advice and countenance ; but now, when the Five Articles were to be treated and ratified, neither have they a GeneraU Assembly with whom to advise, nor a promiscuous meeting of ministers, but wUl have aU that are opposite to their intention to be removed out of the towne. Howbeit it was granted by proclamation, that so many ministers as might pro cure a warrant from the Bishop might stay stiU ; yet when some craved Ucence, the Bishop would not grant it, unlesse they would promise to make no interpeUation nor intercession, private or pub Uck, against the Five Articles. Some zealous men of the ministerie, understanding before that the charge was to be pubhshed, resolved to leave Informations and Admonitions to the Estates, and agreed upon a Protestation to be presented to them, if the Informations and Admonitions wrought not the effect intended. They left these Informations foUowing : — " Your Honors assembled in this present Parliament, ought to abstaine from all ratification and aU corroboration whatsoever of Perth Assembly, and the acts thereof, for the reasons foUowing, and many moe aUedged and to be produced, if your great adoes could permitt : — " 1. It is but an Assembly single, and in itselfe divided. 2. In forme of proceeding not only different from others, but directly against the order established in the Kirk. 3. In effect contrarious 286 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION to aU GeneraU and ProvinciaU Assembhes, Presbyteries and Ses sions as they are institut, and have been holden in Scotland since Reformation of rehgion within the same. 4. The carried sentence and acts thereof are repugnant to the forme of rehgion receaved, believed, professed, established and defended by this Kirk and whole body of this realme, by your honourable predecessors of worthie memorie, and yourselves, and practised universaUy, and in the severall paroches of this kingdome, these sixtie yeares and above. Non est a consuetudine recedendum facile, nisi rationi adversetur ; much lesse from a known truth, directed and blessed by God in such abundance of benefits, as the land hath enjoyed with rehgion. No Kirk, Protestant nor Lutheran, nor of other profession, Papists or whosoever, wUl go in a change, without some evident, at least ap parent reason of the Word. The change but of the old Calendar for the Pope's new one, (and that is but a small thing), made a great hurly-burly at Riga in Livonia, and at Augusta. " 2. Such ratification should crosse and directly prejudice the Acts of Parhament 1592, and the provision expressed in the end of the Act of Parhament 1597, and aU other acts sett down in favour of the jurisdiction of the Kirk, hberty thereof, Assembhes and discipUne : Item, His Majestie's proclamation, pubUshed and printed at command of his CounseU, 1605 : Item, The protestation made at Perth 1606, and all others made before and since : Item, The Covenant made by the ministers and professors of this king- dome, 1596 and 1597, and aU other bands, whereby pastors and flocks have obhged themselves, in persons and continuaU practice, to stand to the forme of religion receaved and practised. Tales legum mutationes would prove legum vulnera. Quce in suo statu eademque manent, etsi deteriora sunt, tamen utiliora sunt reipublicaz, quam quae per renovationem vel meliora inducuntur. And with what credit and constancie could your Honours confirme separation from your fathers, and the break of ancient unity and conformity with your owne Kirk, when it may be truly said, Melius atque rectius olim provisum , et qua' convcrtuntur, in deterius mutantur? " 3. The Reformers of this Kirk, and such as by a long continu- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 287 ance foUowed them, laid a sure foundation, and buUded upon the same without error, notwithstanding of difficUl tymes. It were our wisdom to go forward, and not backward ; to strengthen, and not to weaken. David left not the ark where Saul left it, nor Solomon where David. If our fathers were in the way, our change is error, and out of the way. And shaU we say now, that our sound and ancient profession is priscus rigor, cui jam pares non sunt homines ? Constantine's course was more commendable. Perfecit Constantinus quod Philippics jam cceperat. It were our duty if our forebeears have done wrong, to practise the rule, Quce illicita a prcedecessoribus inveniuntur, admissa in melius revocari oportet. " 4. Observation of holy dayes, kneeUing, &c, as they are straitly enjoined, are void of the necessary properties requyred by the wisest fathers in a lawful ceremonie, utfidei congruat, saluti profi- ciat, discipline conducat ; so in this Kirk, neither are they neces sary, expedient, nor fitting the frame of our Reformation. They edify not ; they divide and destroy. In so farr as ceremonies, be ing testes religionis, they are signes to the adversaries of the truth, that we repent our Reformation, which is not; and presages to returne to their damned ceremonies, which, by the grace of God, we mean not, in substance or ceremonie. To reinduce them, say the Divines of Germanie, is to disturb the peace of the Kirk, to grieve the godly, to wound the weak, to countenance Poperie by shew of inchnation towards it, or commoderation with it. In neighbour Kirks where they most prevaiU, their removaU is most earnestly sought. " 5. In Perth Assembly, they are concluded not as laws bind ing either to fault or paine, but as admonitions or constitutions. Magnum est discrimen inter ecclesiastica decreta et politica, quorum necesse est ilia minus obstringere conscientias ; nam in ecclesiasticis, spectanda est tvrufya, in politicis autem parendum est, quamvis tu earn eutaxiam non videas. Such ceremonies are juris privati, non publici. Ek man is bound in conscience by the Word, first to discerne what is indifferent, and then to direct himselfe in the right use of every individuaU thing for his own edification. And 288 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION if ministers and professors be restrained from that search, and brought under a compeUed obedience by the law, that were to re vive the ancient servitude of the German Adiaphorisme, wherewith the godly wold never suffer themselves to be entangled : Nulla lex sibi solam conscientiam justitice suae debet, sed Us a quibus obsequium exspectat. " 6. Our forebeears findeth the controverted ceremonies to be the mouse-webbs of Popery, and hke the moudiworts in Thessaly, that overthrew a whole towne. Quod in Papatu dolendum, in re- formatione auferendum putarent. They not only took away Baal, but the calves of Dan and Bethel. They thought it nowayes meet to follow Pilate's poUcie, to please the Jews with scourgeing of Christ that they might keep him alive. And wUl the Papists be pleased with scourgeing the doctrine with inventions, &c, and taking again some of these ceremonies ? WiU that preserve us against their heat breathed out against us as hereticks, and make us lurk under mitigation, as if we were now but schismaticks ? ' Non est ad hunc modum in religione agendum,' (saith one) ; ' tota enim repurganda est, et ad vivum emendanda.' And another saith, e Atqui prcestaret sepultam esse doctrinam ad tempus, quam sic fla- gellari.'' It is to be feared, before it be long, that men disaffected to the ancient order shaU further presume, ere it be long, to give out other doctrines as weU as new ceremonies. " 7. Ratification wold compasse a great many ministers and pro fessors of this Kirk between two dangerous straits : Either to prac tise against the truth, as they understand it, and have walked in it, and against the personall bands, whereby they have obliged themselves to stand constantly to the obedience of it, or else to fall under the breach of a civU law, more hardly, perhaps, to be pursued than the lawes against heresies, blasphemies, breaking of the Sabbath Day, &c. In such case, as we are alwayes ready, in our goods and bodies, to the increasing and upholding of his Majestie's honour and Estate ; so, according to our possibility, and the occurrent necessity of his Majestie's affairs, we cheerfuU offer our best supplies and help. And for ease of our just greevances, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 289 and fears of our Christian Uberty from constraint of ceremonies, we humbly begg to have returned ratification of our ancient Uberties of reUgion. Ceremonies should be perswaded by reason, and not enforced by compulsion. Propter externos ritus disciplines homines pios ferire, neque Domini est voluntas, neque purioris ecclesice mos. In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ we requyre your Honours, that at this tyme ye walk in the matters of the Kirk, as one day ye shaU be judged dutifuU, according to the Scriptures foUowing : — ' Beware of men ; bewarr of eviU workers.' ' Let no man beguile you with enticeing words.' ' Stand fast in the faith ; quite you like men; be strong.' ' Stand fast in the Uberty wherewith Christ hath made you free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.' ' Hold fast the form of sound words.' ' That good thing which is committed unto thee, keep.' ' Contend earnestly for the faith which was once given to the saints.' ' Seeing ye know these things before, bewarr lest ye faU from your owne sted- fastnesse. ' Strengthen the things which remain that are ready to die. Eemember how thou hast receaved, and heard ; and hold fast, and repent. If thou watch not, I wiU come upon thee suddenly luce a thief in the night, and thou shalt not know what hour.' ' They have no courage for the truth upon earth.' (Jeremiah, ix. 3.)" FIVE REASONS WHY THE FIVE ARTICLES OF PERTH OUGHT NOT TO BE RATIFIED IN THIS PRESENT PARLIAMENT. " First, Because that Assembly was not lawfully constitute, wanting a fundamentall privUedge of a lawfuU Assembly, in re spect that, contrary to the Act of the Generall Assembly, holden anno 1600, and anno 1568, Bishops, Barrons and Burgesses, votted, not being authorized with Commissions from Synods, Presbyteries, nor Sessions of Kirks. His Majestie's letter, directed to particular barrons and burgesses, without commission from their incorpora tions, could not give them vote in Parliament, much less in the GeneraU Assembly. 290 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION " Secondly, Putting the case that these Articles were indiffe rent, yet the Assembly hath erred, in respect it hath concluded contrary to the apostohck rule in things indifferent ; which is, that the practice should not only not compeU him that, for conscience, refuseth to practise, but, also, lest he offend him, should forbear to practise himselfe ; propter conscientiam non tuam, sed ipsius, dico, 1st Corinth, x. 29. ' If thy brother be grieved for thy meat, now walkest thou not charitably. Destroy him not for thy meat for whom Christ hath died.' (Rom. xiv. 15.) " Third, Because the foresaid Articles being determined in al teram partem per circumstantias irnpeditivas in themselves, are un lawfuU : the observation of it drawing with it a revolt, and return ing back again to Popish rites and ceremonies ; a violation of our profession, subscriptions and oaths, whereby we renounced them ; a confirming of Papists in their errors, and putting them in hope of our coming to them in more substantial points ; grieving of the hearts of aU zealously affected ; a preparative in the hearts of the commontie, (who measure rehgion more by externa!! masks- of ceremonies, than by substantial points of doctrine), to the receav ing again of whole Poperie ; a terrible renting of this Kirk, and inducing Atheisme instead of rehgion, the people not knowing what to believe ; and seeing the observation of YuUl obtruded, which, before discharged by Act of Parhament in aU pulpits in Scotland, was sufficiently declared to be the invention and tra dition of men, to be wUl worship and superstition, intertaining the people in an error anent the birth of Christ, leading them to aU sort of excess and profanation : And geniculation, the first of the fifteen ceremonies of the Masse, (teste Dellarmino,) a gesture u> vented and ordained only by Antichrist, more than 1300 years since, after Christ, as the principaU externaU worship of their breaden God, now inforced in the celebration of the Lord's Supper, under pretence of indifference, more reverence and humility ; as if we were not forbidden, prcecepto negativo, to presume to give or receave the Communion more reverently than Christ and his disciples did ; or that we were not commanded, prcecepto affirma- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 291 tivo, to imitate Christ in aU his rehgious actions, neither mira culous nor admirable, nor having particular reason restricting them to that time ; as though we were not warranted, prcecepto compara tive, rather to imitate Christ with a table gesture, in that holy banquet, than Antichrist with a gesture of adoration inductive to idolatrie ; or, as though a man were able to give a reason why the surplice, the crosse, and the elevation of the bread, may not as well be receaved, (being of more antiquity). And if the ministers, ha ving a surphce, with crossing, elevate the bread, and the people bow their knee, what want we of a mass ? Ubi semel deerratum est, in prceceps devenitur. " Fourth, Because, if the High Commission be emboldened, with ratification of this Parliament, to deprive ministers that wUl stand out against these ceremonies, being the greatest number of the best qualified, most painfull and fruitful of their calling within the land, what a lamentable desolation shaU it draw upon this Church ! What a wound shaU it be to every godly heart, to see their faithfuU pas tors deprived, wairded, and banished, for giving the Communion as Christ gave it, and refusing to give it after the forme of Anti christ ! Is this a tyme to obtrude Antichristian ceremonies in the Kirk, when the bloody sword of Antichrist is embrued in the blood of so many Protestants in France and Germany ? " Lastly, Because it was never seen, that this Parhament con firmed the Acts of any Assembly, which they knew was caUed in question, not only by a great number of the special of the minis terie, but also by the greatest part of the most zealous professors of the whole bodie of the kingdome ; as is manifest by the prac- • tice of Edinburgh, seeking the Lord's Supper in thousands with out the city." In their Admonitions they inferr that the sound of the feet of Poperie is at the doores, by these tokens — That Papists go free who used to be fyned ; professors are counted Puritans, and rehgion disgraced ; Seminary priests go abroad, and true pastors are con fyned and imprisoned ; sea-ports are patent to forreigne Papists, t2 292 apologetical narration and banished ministers lye unrecalled ; sundry statesmen be smaU friends to the true profession, and not unfriends to Papists ; tyme- servers, and men-pleasers, usurp commission for Christ's Kirk, being the greatest enemies thereof; the disciphne of Christ's Kirk is already weeU nigh destroyed, and turned Antichristian, by the usurpation and tyranny of our Prelates. The bringing back again the cursed ceremonies which many count indifferent, but are, in effect, pernicious, is, by the confession even of the urgers, at least unnecessary and untymous, and so in rehgion abominable and impious ; but, in truth, it is, first, a returning of the dog to the vomit; second, scandalous to Papists and professors; third, con trary to the Word ; fourth, in regard of the present use, wherso- ever they are receaved, proving superstitious ; fifth, by reason of the oath of God, which hereby is despised, blasphemous ; sixth, in regard of the consequences damnable and devilish; and for the manner of their estabhshing by violence and craftinesse, to all who have eyes, odious. In their Protestation they professe, if it shaU happen that any matter be proponed, put in articles, or concluded in prejudice of the reUgion established, and Acts of Parliament passed in favours of the same, they wiU be constrained to use the remedy of a pro testation. Likeas, adhereing to the protestations made at the Par Uament holden at Perth in the year of God 1606, and to the protes tations used in the last ParUament holden at Edinburgh, [1617], and to aU other protestations whatsomever made in favours of the Kirk, and against aU hurts and injuries intended against the same : By the presents, they solemnely protested against all and whatso ever articles, acts, or statutes whatsomever, shaU be proponed, concluded, or published in and from the present Parhament, in prejudice of the jurisdiction and hberty of the Kirk, Assemblies thereof, order estabhshed, or any part thereof, or in favours of the usurped government, and damned hierarchie of ceremonies and alterations whatsomever, concerning the ministration of the sacra ments, or any other point or practice of disciphne receaved in this kingdome. Mr David Barclay was appointed to subscribe to the of the state of the kirk. 293 protestation in their name, and to present it to the Lords of the Articles, being conveened, and, if need be, to affix the same upon the Parliament House door, or Mercat Croce, that their reasonable disassent may be notoriously knowne. The Brformations and Admonitions above mentioned made such impression upon the hearts of many members of the Parliament, that few wold have consented to the ratification of the Five Arti cles, if they had not been wrought upon by the Marquesse of HamUton, the Bishops, and others that were sett on work by them. It was recommended to the care of the double guard, within and without, that no minister, wanting the Bishops Ucence, be suffered to enter into the ParUament House. After the members of the Par liament were placed in their owne ranks a second search was made, that such ministers might be removed, in case any had been suf fered to enter. The Marquesse, in his harangue, after he had laid open the King's great and extraordinary affairs, continuaU debase ments, extraordinary aides, his suffering for the defence of the Pro testants and Reformed Kirks, more than aU the Princes of the world sustained, he spoke of the Five Articles as of matters indif ferent, and therefore might be enjoined by the Prince who hath lawfuU power to command in such things. He promised in the King's name, that if they wold consent to the Five Articles they should never be urged with moe ceremonies. He doubted nothing of their good affection and concurrence to his Majestie's reasonable desyres, and assured them that he wold let his Majestie know every man's part. So the Five Articles were not proponed indifferently and impar- tiaUy to be considered, whether it was reasonable or expedient to passe them in lawes or not, but by way of entreaty, to satisfy the King's desires, and indirect threatening that his Majestie shall be acquaint with every man's part. The choise of the Lords of the Articles was not made of persons most indifferent, of best judgment, and no wayes partiaUy affected to any party, as beseemeth free Parhaments and Counsells. The Bishops chose 294 apologetical narration eight of the NobUity ; those eight choosed eight Bishops ; these togither choosed eight Barrons and eight Burgesses. The Officers of Estates sat and votted with them. The Lords of the Articles should have begun at the affairs of the Kirk, according to the custome ; but to induce such as were not affected to the Ceremonies to a large subsidie, upon hope to be freed from the Five Articles, they began at the taxation. Three dayes were spent in reason ing, voting, presenting petitions, receaving answers, and setting down conditions in favour of men fearing their owne hurt. But the Five Articles were quickly passed over, without regard had to the discontentment of the subjects, the present rent in the Kirk, the suffering of ministers and professors, and other incon veniences likely to ensue. All except four consented to the Five Articles. Mr Patrick Forbesse, Bishop of Aberdeen, was not con tent that the matter was carryed by plurahty of votes, but reviled the contrary minded as singular. Notwithstanding there was good appearance that the Articles should passe in Parliament, being agreed upon by the Lords of the Articles, yet the King's chief agents thought good to hold the Lords of the Articles busied with something, that they might have leasure to deaU with the members of the ParUament. They im ployed some treacherous intelligencers to try such as were yet unknown to them. These insinuated themselves in the meetings of Noblemen, Commissioners of shyres and burrows, and other oc- casionaU meetings, rarer or more frequent, as occasion was offered. They counterfitted a dislike of Perth Articles where they found any to dislike them. Where they thought they were not suspected, they wold craftily disswade men from good motions and resolu tions, with shew of agreement in the generaU end. At night they returned to their directors, and informed them what was every man's disposition, that they might know with whom to deall by themselves, or by others. Whereupon the Noblemen, Commis sioners of shyres and burrows, were requested, in an imperious manner, to forbear their meetings which they should have had for advising, reasoning, and preparing themselves the more dcliberatly OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 295 to vote in pubUck. It was promised, they should have inspection of whatsoever thing past among the Lords of the Articles, at least twenty-four hours before the publick meeting. They were enjoined not to meet without the Great Commissioner's speciaU consent. In the meantyme were the members of Parliament wrought upon. Some were aUured with fair promises to promise consent ; others, howbeit otherwayes weU affected, were so terrifyed that they left the town. Some went home to eschew importunate requests. Some who obstinately refused when they were chosen by their shyres to accept commission, and had taken instruments upon their refusaU, yea, had sworne, neither to ryde nor vote in Parliament at that tyme, were induced both to behave themselves as commis sioners, and to vote for the Articles. In the meantyme, the King, lying near to York, of purpose to receave tymous advertisment, was informed of aU their proceedings. The bruite was spread, that the Parliament was to sit longer than was looked for. But suddenly, without knowledge, and be side the expectation of many of the members of the Parliament, Saturday the 4th of August was appointed to be the last Ryding day. Upon that day, betwixt three and four in the morning, many were raised out of their beds with the sound of the com mon beU, and came forth in arms, barefooted to the streets, fear ing the people had made some insurrection. Those who had their hands deepest in the present course were in the greatest perplex ity, till they understood the people had no other intention but to quench a fyre, consumeing a tenement of land in the Cowgate. When the Lords were "mounting on their horses, a swan flieing over their heads, and muttering her naturall song, the people whispered among themselves, that they feared a bad conclusion of that Parhament. The entry to the Parliament House was straitly keept, lest any minister should enter without the Bishops' passe- port. Mr David Barclay, minister at St Andrews, got entry, but with great difficulty, as farr as to the uttmost barr, where he waited upon occasion to enter farder ; but, in end, was removed and put forth. He being debarred of accesse, fixed a coppie of 296 apologetical narration the protestation above-mentioned upon the door of the ParUament House, and another upon the Croce. After that all the members of the Parhament were sett in their owne places, the Great Commissioner, the Marquesse, exhorted them to yield to the Five Articles concluded in Perth ; made apo- iogie for the King's sincerity in reUgion ; attested, there was no thing under heaven could be so acceptable to bis Majesty, as that the Kirk of Scotland wold receave the Five Articles ; and said, he wold engage his honor, faith, and credit, upon that Princelie word, which his Majesty spoke to him, That if they wold receave those Five Articles at that tyme, his Highnesse wold never bur den them with any moe ceremonies during his lifetyme. This he affirmed again in substance. After that the ChanceUor had ended his speech, no place was left for reasoning. The promise made to the nobihty, to have inspection of the conclusions of the Lords of the Articles, twenty-four hours at least before the publick voting, was tymously remembered by N. But this motion, and aU farther deliberation was with bitterness repeUed. Although the Five Articles were indifferent * in themselves, and in the opinions of the most part, yet were they trussed up togither, that the weighti est might seeme of no greater weight than the rest. The vot ters were discharged here as at Perth to give any reason for their votes. They were directed to expresse their voices by these words, " agree " or " disagree." It came to passe that the wyde opening of the mouth at the syUable a, did eat up the first syUable dis, when some, speciaUy those who spoke with a low voice, being affrayed with the minaceing eyes and looks of the Secretar, answered ; and so the negative was noted for affirmative ; Disagree for Agree. In calling the roU and marking the voices, the distinction of the Three severaU Estates was not obseived, but the names promiscuously called. Sundry voted as proxies for absents. The Secretar voted for two English Vicounts who had never been in Scotland but within this halfe-year. If they had wanted their proxies and the votes of the Officers of Estate, the * That is, unconnected. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 297 affirmative voters had been inferior in number, as men conceaved who were present. Two or thrie noblemen presented not them selves to their places tUl the Articles were past. AU former Acts of ParUament, constitutions and customs, in so farr as they were derogative to any of these Articles, were annulled and rescinded,- as we find them extant in print ; howbeit these words were neither voted nor read in ParUament. Alwayes it is acknowledged that they are repugnant to the former acts ; which some do deny. Howbeit it was usuah in aU ParUaments since the Eeformation, that the Uberties of the Kirk be ratified, the liberty of Assemblies and discipUne for tryaU and punishment of the adversaries of the true reUgion, yet no mention was made of the same. When the Grand Commissioner, the Marquesse, was rising from the throne to ratify the Acts by the touch of the scepter, an extra ordinary great Ughtning was sent in at the windows. After the first, a second, and after the second, a third more dreadfuU. The lightnings were seconded with three great cracks of thunder. The house was dark before by reason of the darknesse of the day; but im mediately after the lightning, foUowed an extraordinary great dark nesse, which astonished aU that were in the house. It appeared to aU that dwelt within the compasse of ten or twelve myles, that the cloud stood right above Edinburgh, and overshaddowed only that part. The people caUed this Saturday, " The Black Saturday." The beacon standing in the entry of Leith haven was beaten down with one of the blasts of thunder. After the lightning, darknesse, and thunder, foUowed a showre of haill stones extraordinary great ; and last of aU, rain in such abundance, that it made the gutters run like Uttle brooks. The Lords were imprisoned about the space of ane hour and an halfe. Servants rode home with foot mantles ; and their masters withdrew themselves, some to coatch and some to foot. So the Five Articles were not honoured with carrying of the Honors, or Ryding of the Estates in ranks. In the mean tyme, the Castle thundered with fyrie cannons, according to the custome used at other Parliaments. This day began with fyre from the earth in the morning, and ended with fyre from heaven at the 298 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION evening. When the fear was past, then durst the Atheists scoffe, and say, That as the Law was given with fyre from Mount Sinai, so did these fyres confirme their lawes.* Bishop Spottiswood went to Leith that night, and crossed the ferrie the day foUowing, ac cording to his custom of profaneing the Lord's Day. Upon Monday the 20th of August, the Acts of ParUament were proclamed at the Mercat Crosse of Edinburgh. The tempest, rain, thunder and fyre-flaughts f were renewed, and continued aU the tyme of the reading of the Acts at the Crosse. After the Acts of Perth were read, Doctor Barclay fixed a coppie of the protestation above written upon the Crosse, and another upon the kirk-door, and a third upon the palace-gate of Holyrood House ; whereupon he took instruments with aU requisite solemnities, using the words following : — " Here, in the name of the bretherne of the ministery professing the rehgion as it hath been practised in our Kirk since the Eeformation of the same, I protest against aU those things that have been concluded in prejudice of our privUedges since the first Eeformation thereof ; and adheres to my former protestation made and affixed upon the Tolbooth door and other places, and to aU other protestations made in favours of the Kirk in tyme of pre ceeding Parliament." The King, having obtained the vantage of a law, enjoined [on] the Bishops rigorous execution, aUedgeing that the greatest matter the Puritans had to object against the Church government was, that their proceedings were warranted by no law, which now, by this last Parliament, was cutt short. As the sword was put into their hand he exhorted them to go on to use it, and let it rust no longer, tiU they perfected the service trusted to them. This letter, as many other of that kind, was no doubt procured, if not devised and penned, by the Bishops themselves, and sent up to Court. The stile is like Spottiswood's. Upon the 10th of October, the King directed a letter to the CounseU, willing the Lords of the Secret CounseU and Session, * Calderwood's reflection on this is, " 0 horrible blasphemy !" f Fyre-flaughts, flashes of lightning. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 299 and members of the CoUedge of Justice, to be advertised before Christmasse, to resolve upon obedience to the Five Articles ; to assure the CounseUours and Sessioners, that if any of them do not resolve to conforme within fourteen dayes before Christmasse, he shaU lose his place in his service ; if any advocate or clerk, he shaU be suspended from the exercise of his office, the fees and casualities thereto belonging, tiU such tyme as he conforme. He signifyed also, that it was his speciaU pleasure, that no magis trates, nor officers of burghs, nor shirreffs, nor shireff-clerks, nor officers be chosen throughout the whole ldngdom, but such as in aU points conforme and give obedience to the said orders. About the end of October, the Bishop of St Andrews aUedged he had receaved a letter from the King, to urge aU ministers, readers, and schoolmasters to conforme, or else to depose them, without respect to age or infirmity. Whereupon, Mr Thomas Bigger, reader of Kinghorn, was cited to compear before the High Commission, and wairded in the Tolbooth of St Andrews. In end, the Bishop set him at hberty, upon condition to keep himselfe within the schooU, and neither read in the Kirk, nor discharge the office of a Clerk in the Session. Mr John Murray, then minister at Dunrfermling, was again troubled. He refused to compear before the High Commission, and was forced to remove when the Bishop had procured a war rant to charge him, under the pain of rebeUion, to remove, and to remain confyned within the paroch of Fowles. Mr John Row, minister at Carnock, was confyned in his owne paroch. Mr David Dickson, minister at Eving, was threatened by the Bishop of Glasgow, upon the' 6th of December, for not practising the ceremonies, and labouring what in him lay at the last Parlia ment to impede the acting of the Articles, but was dismissed at that tyme, after some conference and reasoning with the Bishop ; but was summoned upon the 2d of January, to compear before the High Commission in Edinburgh, the 9th of January 1622. He compeared, and after the summonds was read, he desyred 300 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION them to expone his words to the best sense, and to suffer himself to be the exponer. In end, he asked if Mr George Dumbar had given in a declinature, but they wold not satisfy him in that point. He taketh out of his pocket a coppie of the dechnature, and laid it down to the Clerk. Some of the Bishops, whispering in his ear as if they had favoured him, said to him, " Take it up, take it up." He answered calmely, " I laid it not downe to that end to take it up again." St Andrews asked, E he wold subscribe it. He pro fessed he was ready. The Clerk, at the Bishops direction, had scarcely read three lynes when the Bishop burst forth in cursing and raUhng speeches, full of gaU and bitternesse, with a counte nance answerable, and affirmed there was more pride in him than in aU the Bishops of Scotland : he was led with the spirit of re beUion and disobedience, with the spirit of the devUl. " I have hanged," said he, " a Jesuit for the hke fault." Mr David an swered, " I am not a rebeU ; I stand here as the King's subject, and offer myselfe, in my dechnature, to the ordinary judicatorie established afready by the King's laws. Grant me the benefit of the law, and of a free subject ; I crave no more." The Bishop al- ledged, His parishoners craved continuation, upon some hope ; which they denyed. The Bishop of Glasgow aUedged, That he had promised to such as had interponed request for him, that if he behaved himself well before the High Commission, he should be suffered to return home ; but by this declinature he had marred the matter, and made it immedicabile vulnus. But the truth was, he promised to the Countesse of Eglintoun, that if Mr David be haved himself quietly, when he came to the towne of Edinburgh, he should not be called upon [to appear before] the High Commission; which was not performed. The Bishop desired his parochiners to remove, and move him to take up his declinature. They craved a tyme ; but it was not granted. Neither did they as he desyred. He called him a Schismatick, an Anabaptist, one that had misled them, and fiUed them with fantasies : he raiUed likewise upon the Towne-Clerk, before they went forth. When Mr David was call ed in again, St Andrews saith to him, " Thou art a rebeU, a OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 301 breaker of the fifth command, disobedient to the King and us, who may be your father, both one way and another : ye shaU ryde with a thicker back before ye ding the King's Crown off his head." " Farr may such a thought be from me," answered Mr David. " By God's grace, there shaU not a stroak come from the King's hand, that shaU divert my affection from him." " It is a Puritan tale," said Saint Andrews ; " ye caU the King your King, but he must be ruled by you." Aberdeen asked, " May not the King give his authority that we have, to as many souters and taylors in Edinburgh, to sit, and see whether ye do your duty or not ?" " My dechnature answered to that," said Mr David. Then Spotts wood of St Andrews feU to raUling again. " The devUl," said he, " wUl do so, wiU draw anew with him, he has Scripture enough." He caUed Mr David, knave, swingeor, a young lad ; " you might have been teaching bairns in the school. Thou knowest what Aristotle saith, but thou hast no theologie." Because he perceaved Mr David gave him no stUes, but once caUed him " Sir," he gnash ed his teeth, and said, " Sir, ye might have caUed me ' Lord.' Long since, when I was in Glasgow, ye caUed me ' Lord ;' but I cannot tell how you are become a Puritan now." Mr David stood sUent aU the tyme, and once lifted up his eyes to heaven, which St Andrews caUed a proud look. At last, Mr David said, " I have been eight years a Eegent in the CoUedge of Glasgow, and four years a minister. Those among whom I have lived, know I am not the man ye call me. Say to my person what you please, by God's grace, it shall not touch me." " Ay," said St Andrews, " ye gEry in your sufferings. There are here who wold suffer more for a good cause, than ye wUl do for an eviU." " No," said Mr David, " I glory not in my suffering ; but if ye wiU trouble me, I hope to have peace in my suffering ; as I said to the Bishop of Glasgow, in his owne gaUerie." St Andrews gave out the sen tence in these words : " We deprive you of your ministerie at Irving, and ordaine you to enter in Turreff, in the North, within twenty days." " The wiU of the Lord be done," saith Mr David ; " though ye cast me off, yet the Lord will take me up. Send me 302 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION whither ye please, I hope my master shall go with me ; and as he hath been with me heretofore, wUl be with me stUl, as with his owne weak servant." " Sweeth away !" saith St Andrews, as if he had been speaking to a dogg, " pack, ye swinger !" and cryed to the door keeper, " Shutt * him out !" The Bishops were as soon in the streets as the honest men : so it seemeth they neither began nor ended with prayer. The Pro curator FiscaU, at whose instance he was summoned, was not pre sent. He was neither accused nor convicted. They asked not so much as, " WUl ye obey the Acts of the Assembly ?" but only raUled, and gave out sentence without mention of any cause. When they considered the words that had past, they could find no advantage, but only, that he had said, " He wold obey the King in the Lord ;" which importeth as much, say they, as [that] the King commanded not in the Lord. After that he had continued preaching twenty days, he took instruments of his readinesse to enter into his journey to Turreff. But at the Earle of Eghntoun's request, the Bishop of Glasgow granted him Ucence to come to Eglintoun, where he teached in the HaU, or the closse, for the space of two months. Then the Bishop sent him a charge to remove to his waird, upon the 11th of AprUe ; howbeit the week preceeding he had promised to the ministers of Glasgow, and forty other ministers, and the Commissioners sent from Eving, that he should not be hastie in the chargeing him. In the narrative of the charge, mention was made, that he was deprived of his ministery within this kingdome ; whereas, in the sentence they deprived him only of the exercise of his ministerie at Eving. Where the Bishop in the High Commission had or- danied him to enter into Turreff, without mention of confyne- ing of him within the bounds of that viUage ; in the charge, he was discharged to passe out of the bounds thereof. So being charged, he addresseth himself to Turreff, in obedience to the civill part. Mr George Dumbar, minister at Air, after the reading of the * Shtitt or shoot, push. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 303 summonds, which threatened deprivation, and that some words had past concerning conformity, he gave in a Dechnature. The Bishop raged, and aUedged he had denyed the King's authority, and made a shew to caU for the Provest and baiUies to putt him in closse prison. St Andrews aUedged, Father Anderson, the Jesuite, was a better subject, and caUed aU the Puritans of Scot land " hers." Mr George answered, " We disclame not the King's authority ; we appeaU to the authority established by the King and the lawes of the realme, which, in aU humility, we wiU obey either actively or passively." They proceed, notwithstand ing, to the sentence of deprivation, and ordained him to be con fyned in Dumfries. The Dechnature given in severaUy by Mr David Dickson and him here foUoweth : — " Forasmuch as the AssembUes of this Kirk standing in force, and ratified by the lawes of this kingdome, have respectively, and properly belonging to them only, lawfuU power and Uberty to try, admitt, and ordaine quahfied persons to the service of the minis terie ; and to suspend and remove from the same such as shall happen to be found guUtie and insufficient; and to exerce the whole jurisdiction and discipUne of the Kirk, according to the order estabhshed : By virtue whereof, and by reason of the so lemne oath of God, astricting, the whole kingdome, and especiaUy the ministrie thereunto, the lawfuU GeneraU and ProvinciaU Assem bhes, and Presbyteries, have lawfuU power and liberty in matters of admission and deprivation, to or from ecclesiasticaU functions : Nevertheless we have receaved the coppie of a lybeU, whereby we are summoned to answer at your instance, in a cause of depriva tion, contrary to the privUedges and Uberties of the Kirk, lawes of the countrey, and commendable course and practice hitherto observed within this Kirk and kingdome. Herefore we most earnestly and humbly desyre you, that ye wold wisely consider and cease to trouble us with such commandments as may intend prejudice, or prove hurtfuU, to the Kirk and kingdome of Christ within this realme : Otherwayes, for the obliged respect and dutie 304 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION we carry to the Kirk, and lawfuU Assemblies thereof, we wUl be forced to declyne you, as judges no wayes competent in the cause lybeUed. Likeas, we being most wUling to eschew the meanest degree and imputation of contempt, have disposed ourselves to come in your presence, to declare unto you the necessity of our subjection to the judges and judicatories above specified ; and in that respect to testify our declyning from you, as incompetent judges in the cause lybeUed. And by these presents, we simpli citer declyne you, offering ourselves most wiUingly to a lawfuU and ordinary judgment, appointed and estabhshed by the Lawes of our kingdome, concerning us and our affairs, and that for the reasons foUowing, and others to be aUedged in tyme and place : — " 1. Because the right of tryall, cognition, and giving of sentence in the cause expressed in the lybeU, standeth in the power and priviledge of the lawfull Assemblies respective above written, which by no law nor canon of the Kirk as yet extant are canceUed, an- nuUed, or declared expyred, much lesse translated or devolved in your persons, to try, cognosce, appoint punishments, and execute sentence at your pleasure. " 2. Because this forme of judicatorie is mixed of civill and ec-< clesiasticaU persons, for the inflicting of civiU and ecclesiasticaU censures upon the parties conveened before you, to the prejudice of that distinction, which should be betwixt civill and ecclesiasticaU judicatories, according to the Word of God, and estabhshed order in this kingdome ; whereby it is out of aU question, that no civiU person can sitt and cognosce upon the deprivation of a minister : As also, that no minister or ecclesiasticaU person may inflict any civill punishment, nor yet any such ecclesiasticaU censures as be long to a whole Assembly, much lesse in their owne names libel edicts, summon parties, impose dyets of compearance, lead pro cesse, give out sentences, not only indifferent, but, in many re spects, contrarie to the formes of proceedings receaved and prac tised in the Kirk's affairs, as the lybeU whereby we are summoned importeth." OF THE STATE OF THE KTRK. 305 Mr George Johnstoun, minister at Ancrum, was cited to com pear at the same tyme. He sent his excuse that he was not able to travell by reason of the infirmity of his body, and the present storme. He was summoned again to compear the 28th of June, for not preaching to the people upon Christmasse day, &c, and not ministring the Communion according to the form prescrived in Perth Assembly. He again excused himself with the infirmitie of his body, and an accustomed fever which followed after his travell in the free air, with other miseries foUowing old age. * In the post script he has these words : " Ingerere violentiam naturae odiosum est. Pueritia apud omnes meretur favorem, commiserationem senectus. Calumniatorem oderis." By the calumniator he meant Mr John Abernethie, Bishop of Cathnesse, a diocie in the North, but con tinuing stiff minister of Jedburgh, a burgh in the South, who carryed an inveterate malice against him. Bishop Spottiswood Bishop Law, Bishop Lamb, the Bishop of Rosse, the Bishop of Aberdeen and the Bishop of Caithnesse, decerned the old man, who was at the seventy-third year of age, and had been full fiftie years a minister, to be deprived of all function in the ministery, and to be confyned in Annandale during the King's pleasure. He con tinued, notwithstanding, preaching every Lord's Day, not knowing that they had deprived him, tUl they intruded not long after a young man in his place, vacant by his deprivation. Mr Andrew Duncan sent this letter following, dated the 23d of ¦October 1622, to the Bishop of St Andrews : — " My Lord, — It might be supponed, that seeing I have been so many years under censure of banishment and imprisonment, I might now at last, in my old dayes, look for some pitie and ease, and so much the rather, in respect that favour is now extended to the enemies of the trueth and the Estate, commandment being given out to set them at large out of their wairds and prisons. We that are Christ's servants and ministers then, might be worthUy blamed, * George Johnstone was admitted minister of Ancrum, in Nov. 1572. (Register of Ministers, p. 41.) See also the List of Ministers, 1574, in the Miscellany of the Wod row Society, vol. i.. p. 375. 306 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION if we expected lesse than these have already obtained. I must now at last, therefore, request that it wold please you not to trouble me, although I go and serve my Master in that caUing he has set me in. King Adonibezeck's judgment should affray mercUesse souls. HaU binks are slidderie you know, and earthly courts are kittle ; and King's minions are sett upon high skelfs, but slipperie and dangerous. I have seen one right high, mounted in your roome * and course, that got a fouU and shamfuUe faU. Pitie your poor soul, and look up to Him that can do this, to the Mightiest. I beseech you remember you have overthrown my poor estate ; but what reck of that ? you have hindered God's work to be done in many places. The Lord of heaven give you remorse. I beseech you, as you tender your owne salvation, play no more the burrioe t upon your brethren : that is the devU's part. Eeturne, amend, and disappoint many. If you pertain to God, these lynes wUl do you no evU. God make you seek mercie and mend. Yours to be commanded in aU good, Andrew Duncan, Minister of Christ Jesus at CraiU." " Anstruther, 23d of October 1622. I beseech you for an answer with the bearer." The hard-hearted Bishop wrote this answer at the end of the ¦ letter :— " Brother, — I am sorry to see you insist in your follies. Our Kirk has no need of such spirits, especially at this tyme. You shall do weU to be quyet, lest you faU in the hands of worse burrioes than ' I have been. I minde to die without remorse, for any thought or; deed I have ever had or kythed to you, or any of the brethren. I returne you your owne letter to feed upon. FareweeU." Mr Robert Boyd, who had been many years a Professor of Theologie, and a preacher at Salmure in France, and after his re- , turne a Professor and PrincipaU in the CoUedge of Glasgow, was i * An evident allusion to Adamson, Archbishop of St Andrews. f Burrio, an executioner. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 307 admitted PrincipaU in the CoUedge of Edinburgh, in October 1622. The ministers of Edinburgh envyed him for his non-conformity, and the applause he had for his gifts, both in pulpits and schooUs. Bishop Spottiswood, at a conference with the ministers of Edin burgh, commending them for the harmony that was among them, (meaning their uniformity in conformity,) one of their number, Mr Andrew Ramsay, answered, " But there is one string out of tune." The Provost, BaiUies and Counsell of the towne were chaUenged in December, by a letter from the King for admitting him, and were commanded to remove him if he conformed not. They entreated a courteour to deall for him ; but the King, upon the last of January 1623, commanded them of new, to remove him, his wife and family out of the towne, unlesse he conformed totally. The King was not content that he was removed from his office, unlesse he were also removed out of the towne. So he was forced to quyt his pkce, and took his leave. Upon the 23d of March 1624, the Counsell, Session and remanent citizens of the town of Edinburgh, convened according to the ancient custome, observed amongst them since the Reformation to remove jars and eyelists, before the receaving of the Communion. The ministers removed themselves according to the custome, that if any of the people had any thing to object against them, they might utter their mynds freely. John Dickson, merchant, aUedg ed, that Mr WiUiam Forbesse, * affirmed in his doctrine that we and the Papists may be easily reconciled in many of the heads controverted betwixt us and them. John Fleeming, merchant, added, that he affirmed the Papists and we might be easily re conciled in many of the heads controverted, but especiaUy in the head of justification. David Aikenhead and Mr John Hay, the town-clerk, aUedged the place was impertinent to challenge them for their doctrine. James Cathkine, merchant and stationer, insisted that the order should be observed ; that which was deliver ed pubhckly requyred a publick admonition. They usurped not * Forbes was one of the Ministers of Edinburgh ; and became first Bishop of the newly erected See of Edinburgh in 1633, but he died within three months of his nomination. u2 308 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION the power of jurisdiction over them, but only craved satisfaction for removing of offence. John Hamilton, apothecarie, desyred the judgment of the rest of the ministers might be had. This ad vice was followed and the rest were caUed in. They were not a little displeased that they were holden so long at the door. It was told them, what exception was taken at Mr WiUiam Forbesse doc trine, and their advice was craved how to deaU in it. The honest men looked for their assistance, but they took it for a common cause ; touch one and touch aU ; the people had no power to judge of their doctrine. It was answered by the honest men, They were " bound to try the spirits ; Christ's sheep should not foUow the voice of strangers : they took not upon them to censure, but only craved their judgment how the matter should be tryed, and the person, if found guilty, censured. But the honest men could obtaine no good answer; such was their pryde and despite that any of their number should be caUed in question. Then they went to another purpose. James Cathkine and John Mein, merchants, desyred the Communion might be cele brate after the old manner, that they might communicate alto gether in love ; and so the rent may be healed. But nothing could be obtained of the ministers but quarrelling, because they did not first admonish Mr Forbesse privately ; whereunto an swer was made as before. The ministers, especiaUy Mr WUUam Forbesse and Mr Thomas Sydserfe, were vehement in their invectives against the people. Mr Struther, in a letter sent to the Bishop of St Andrews, laid the blame upon him, if they were trod under foot by the people. The rest of the ministers in their general letter to the Bishop, requested him to purchase from the King their dimission out of Edinburgh. This request imported a grievous complaint. In the mean tyme they never chaUenged Mr WUUam Forbesse for his corrupt doctrine, nor craved tryaU before the Presbytry or Synod, whereby they bewrayed great corruption. Upon the last of Aprile, William Rigg, baUlie, John Dickson, '¦ John Hamilton, Joseph Miller, advocat, John Mein, and William OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 309 Simpson, merchants, were charged every one of them severaUy by a macer to compear before the Lords of CounseU, — so many as the King had selected for their tryaU. Every one of them was examined severally, and answered plainly and simply as the matter passed. The Bishop of St Andrews had a minute of interrogatories for every one that was to be examined, furnished, no doubt, by the ministers of Edinburgh, who understood best how to examine every one of them particularly. Because they had not receaved any libeUed summonds, they were the readier to depone every one what was their own part. None of the Magistrates or Town CounseU who were ear-witnesses could im prove any thing they deponed. WUliam Rigg confessed more than he needed, forgetting that others had proponed the question concerning the celebration, because he was of that mynd himself. Upon the 7th of June 1624, the King directed the above-named CounseUors to deprive William Rigg of his office, to fyne him in 50,000 pounds, to waird his person in Blacknesse Castle tiU the Bourne were payed, and after to confyne him in Orkney. When the Lords began to apprehend whereto such a preparative might tend, they thought good to bring the matter before the fuU Coun sell ; so they were all cited, except Joseph Millar, spared at the intercession of some friends, to compear before the Counsell the 10th of June. To prevent the sentence, WUliam Rigg caused the Clerk to forme a biU, wherein he referred himself to the testimony of the ministers themselves, and others, who were present at that meeting, whether he uttered that which he had confessed doubt- ingly before. Whereupon the King's direction was mitigate upon the 10th of June, and he was ordained only to keep his owne house. In the mean tyme they absolve him from that for which the King wold have them to proceed against him to the rigor. John Dickson and WiUiam Sympson were ordained to enter in the jaill of Edinburgh ; John Mein within the towne of Elgine ; John HamUton within the town of Aberdeen ; for ryot and misdemean our, forsooth ! at that meeting, upon Tuesday the 23d of March. There behoved to be some colour. 310 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Upon a complaint made by the Ministers of Edinburgh, that they could have no peace with the people, so long as other ministers; especiaUy the deprived and silenced, resorted to the towne, and keept " private conventicles," as they called them ; a charge waa given and published, that none meet and conveen in any private house or place, to any preaching, exhortation, or any such rehgious exercises, except those of the familie, or their friends resorting to eat and lodge within the same ; that they attempt not to impugne, by discourse or disputation, by word or writ, the true rehgion or lawfuU discipUne of the Kirk, approved and authorized by the lawes ; or slander his Majesty by false suggestions, as if he perse cuted the professors of the true religion. By the narrative of the charge it appeareth that it was penned by the Bishop of St An drews ; for it was aUedged, in the narrative, that those who con veened abstained from hearing the Word preached ; that their private meetings were many tymes at the ordinary hours, when their owne pastors were preaching in their parish kirk ; that they assumed to their conventions the name of Congregation ; of which imputations they might have easily cleared themselves. The King rebuked the Lords of Secret CounseU for their lenity towards the citizens cited before them ; commanded them to put in execution his wiU, and yet again to committ WUliam Rigg to Blacknesse, and to deprive him of his office. Some of them dealt with the ministers of Edinburgh to entreat the CounseU and the Bishops for them, but could obtain nothing of them but a generaU and fecldesse letter to the Bishop, because they wold not promise to communicat with them. They had great reason to refuse, be cause aU the professors within the Kirk of Scotland were bound, by the Confession of Faith, to maintaine the order of administrar tion which was receaved in this Kirk, when the Confession of Faith was first subscribed, and was stiU practised by two parts, at the least, of the congregations of Scotland, still opponeing to these novations. Upon the 2d of July 1624, the Lords of Secret Counsell, to give the King contentment, directed a charge to William Rigg to OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 311 enter his person in waird in the. Castle of Blacknesse, deprived him of his office of BaUharie of Edinburgh, and declared him inca pable hereafter of any office within the towne ; which was a mat ter that touched the Uberties of the towne. John Dickson was deprived of the office of an elder ; WUUam Sympson of the office of a deacon ; and both declared incapable of these or any other offices in tyme coming ; and were ordained to enter in the jaUl of Edinburgh. John Mein was charged to enter in Elgine of Mur ray, the place of his confynement. John Hamilton obtained pro rogations of his Confynement three sundry tymes. The King stUl insisted upon the fyne of 50,000 pounds to be laid upon WUUam Rigg, because he was informed that he was the chiefe ringleader of the non-conformitants in Edinburgh, and that he contributed liberaUy to the printing of books. John HamUton was fyned, likewise, in 20,000 merks, but the CounseU was loath to exact the fynes. The Ministers of Edinburgh wrought continually upon John Dickson and WiUiam Sympson, whUe they were in the jayle, tUl they obtained their promise to communicate ; yet was not John Dickson set at liberty tiU he feU sick, and then was suffered only to keep his owne house. A charge was proclaimed at the Crosse of Edinburgh, upon the 2d of August, that the Communion be celebrated in all the kirks of Edinburgh at Christmasse next, and that aU persons, as well of the Privie CounseU, Session, Magistrates of Edinburgh, as others of the Commonalitie, be present, and communicate kneeUing, with certification that his Majesty wold remove the Session, and all other Courts of Justice out of the said burgh. The wairding and confyneing of the persons above named ; imposing great fynes upon some of them ; the fear of removaU of the Session, made the King conceave that all, some few excepted, wold conforme, and, if Edin burgh yeelded, [that] the rest of the countrey wold foUow their ex ample. Yet the number that resolved to stand out was greater than the King or his informers did apprehend. It was ordained in the CounseU, upon the 20th of September, 312 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION That all burghs should be charged by proclamation to choose con forme men, or such as wold grant to conforme, to be Magistrates, under the pain of incurring the King's high displeasure. John Hamilton and John Dickson were ordained, the first to enter, the other to re-enter, their persons in the jayle of Edin burgh, conforme to a letter directed from the King, but by in formation and advice, no doubt, of the Bishops and ministers here at home. Christmasse approaching, it behoved some to be made an example, to strick a terror in the hearts of others. While these means were used for preparing the way for Christ- maese Communion, the pest breaketh up, upon the 28th of No vember, in sundry houses in Edinburgh, to the great terror of the whole towne. The Lords of CounseU and Session meeting togither upon the last of November, resolved to rise, and continue the Ses sion till the 8th of January. So the Christmasse Communion was not celebrated. John HamUton and John Dickson, after they had been detained nineteen dayes in the jayle, were, upon their sup plication, suffered to attend upon their famUies in the tyme of the plague ; and John Mein returned from Elgin to visit his famihe, about the beginning of January 1625. WiUiam Rigg, after he had been detained in waird in the Castle of Blacknesse half a year, obtained liberty to repaire to his owne house two myles dis tant from Edinburgh, to attend upon his owne affairs for the space of forty dayes, because of the pest. But before the forty dayes expyred, it pleased the Counsell to confyne him in his owne house in Fife. The King, being disappointed of Christmasse Communion, through the breaking up of the pest, resolved to have the Com munion celebrated at Easter, in Edinburgh, according to the Act of Perth, with great solemnitie. Upon the 8th of January, the Lords of Session sat downe to keep Session, and so continued, tUl one of the Senators of the Colledge of Justice his servants fell sick, which the Senator him selfe apprehended to be the pest. But it was thought the advo cates were idle, because the subjects resorted not to the burgh OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 313 for fear of infection, and, therefore, were wUling to take hold of any occasion to depart off the towne. Upon the 6th of March, sure report was brought hither from Court of the Marquesse of HamUton's death. Upon the last of March, sure report was brought from Court, that King James had departed this life at Theobalds, upon the 27th of March. So, the Communion, which was to be celebrated within fourteen days after, that is, at Easter, was not celebrated with that solemnity which was intended. John Hamilton, and John Mein, had been ordain ed to enter into their confines ; but the death of the King inter- veening betwixt and ' the tyme that they should have entered, stayed, and so an end was put to their trouble at this tyme. WUliam Eigg was relieved of the fear he had of his fyne. John Dickson was set at hbertie, and communicate with the kneeUers, but at his departure had great remorse. We were put in some esperance that King Charles wold re dresse whatsoever enormities were committed in the government of the Kirk, and hearken to our grievances ; but we found no alte ration. The course of Conformity continued and advanced. In AprUe foUowing, after his Father's death, he wiUed the Bishop of St Andrews to go on in that good course wherein his Father had set him. He advertised his brethren, the remanent Bishops, to do the like, and to certify them, that it is his speciaU wUl to have the order and lawes which were established concerning Church matters to be obeyed, as was decerned by his Father. Howbeit the Bishops shewed his letter to sundry, yet, because it was private, it was not thought sufficient to work dispair in the hearts of zealous professors. A publict Declaration of the King's wiU was thought requisit. Therefore, upon the first of August nixt following, it was declared, by publict proclamation at the Crosse, " That whereas, some disconforme and averse persons from the present govern ment of the Kirk, and contemners of his authority, by trans gressing the orders established by Acts of Parliament, have travelled to pcrswade sundry subjects, that he intended to make 314 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION some alteration of the Kirk government, and Canons thereof, happily established by his dearest Father, and that he minded not any more to urge the observation of Acts concluded at Perth, and ratified in Parliament, to the intent, that all such false and foolish rumors may be suppressed, and the growth and progresse thereof may be prevented ; that he was so farr from any purpose of inno vation of the government of the Kirk, so happUy estabhshed by his dearest Father, that if the same had not been already deter mined, he wold, with aU his care, have advanced the same, as knowing it to be the only best government whereby a Christian Kirk can be weU ruled in monarchies and kingdomes ; and that he is resolved, so farr as the lawes do aUow, to punish any person that dare seek to disturbe the peace of rehgion or present govern ment." In September foUowing, a direction was sent downe from the King to the CounseU of Edinburgh, that none be chosen magis trates, but such as were conforme. By this means, a faction, of conformitants in Edinburgh engrossed the government of the town in their own hands, or rather a faction of some few, taking the advantage against others worthier than themselves for their non es o conformity. There was likewise a direction, that the former De claration should be printed, and copies thereof affixed upon the Crosse, the Kirk doors and other places, that none pretend igno rance ; which, notwithstanding, was not execute, nor yet needful,. for his mynd was sufficiently known. Lords of CounseU, Lords of Session, Advocates and Clerks, were charged in the King's name, 26th July 1629, to communicat in the ChappeU. They were not bound by law, seeing it was not their paroch kirks. Nixt, howbeit the Communion had been celebrate without offence, yet they were not bound, neither ought they to have communicate in the ChappeU, in respect of other novations brought in without a law : and in that case they were not bound to communicate in their owne paroch kirks. Howbeit the Communion were celebrate in the purest forme, yet obedience was not given, but only by some few scandalous persons, that cared not what novation they coun- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 315 tenance, nor regard that woe the Lord hath pronounced against those that offend his Uttle ones. They offend thousands, and are ringleaders to a generaU defection. The Bishops and such of the Ministers as it pleased them to call for, consulted, from tyme to tyme, upon the Kirk rents and minis ters' stipends. Now, whereas the revocation for settling of the tithes was in hands, they complained to the ministers, that some noblemen wold have had the titles to benefices abohshed, as if by that means the Kirk wold have been undone. Therefore, some Bishops and some Ministers behoved to be sent up to his Majesty, to lay out the case to him ; and those Commissioners they called, The Commissioners of the Kirk, or, The Clergie ; whereas, they were neither Commissioners for the Kirk, nor for the whole Clergie, but for themselves, and such as had more care for the belly and the bannock, than of the purity of reUgion. We know the service of God should be entertained, and sufficient maintenance provided for such as serve in the Kirk of God ; but we wish that the titles of benefices of Bishops, Abbotts, Priorsj Provosts, Deans, Subdeans, Prebenders, Chanters, Subchanters, Parsons, Vicars, &c. were abolished ; for they are but as lures to hawkes, aUurements to un clean birds to seek to their old nests again. What reason is there that the minister of one Kirk should be stipendiarie, the minister of another titular to a benefice ? TiU Bishops that are but bastard office-bearers, and, for the present, plain usurpers, and all other idle and unnecessary office-bearers, be stripped naked of lands, pos sessions, tithes and other kirk rents, parsons and viccars brought within the compasse of proportionable stipends, conforme to the estate and condition of other ministers, there cannot be right order taken for providing mantainance sufficient for the necessary office bearers. Farther, it was great presumption in the ministers meet ing with the Bishops to take upon them that which belonged to a General Assembly ; but the Bishops, unwUling to hear of Generall Assemblies, and lest the necessity of them should be seen, used these promiscuous and confused meetings, as if they had been equivalent to the GeneraU AssembUes, whenas they were nothing 316 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION like. By sending up Commissioners, partly Bishops, partly minis ters, they wold insinuate to the King, that there was great har mony betwixt them and the ministers, and [that] the petitions proceeded not from them alone, but from the whole Clergie or the Kirk ; yet, when they were seeking coUection among the ministe rie, for defraying the charges of their Commissioners, they were not answered according to their mind and expectation, notwith standing of their pretences, that they were sent with articles against Papists, and for mantenance of ministers ; for the better sort of the ministrie deemed, and not without just cause, that the Bishops, by that means, were entertaining agents at Court for their owne standing and the advancement of the course of Conformity ; which might have been gathered by sundry directions from Court, after the return of their Commissioners. At last they gave free hbertie to the Presbyteries to send one or two Commissioners of their owne choise, as they pleased to convene with them. Whereupon the Presbyteries sent one or two Commis sioners from aU quarters, except out of the North, who conveened with the Bishop of Rosse in [Edinburgh,] 1628. The Archbishops absented themselves, that, in case matters succeeded not according to their wish, they might disapprove the meeting ; and so they did after tlieir dissolving. The sincerer sort of the ministery declared plainly, that they wold not acknowledge that meeting for an Assembly, ordinar or extraordinary. Mr Robert Scot, minister at Glasgow, was chosen by the ministers opposit to the present course, to be Commissioner for them to Court ; Mr Patrick Lindsay, Bishop of Rosse, for the conformitants. The articles agreed upon were, 1. To deall for a lawfuU mantenance of the ministry and plantation of kirks. 2. That petition be made for a lawfuU GeneraU Assembly. 3. That petition be made for the ministers banished, deposed, and confyned, that they may be restored to their places, to the end they may be present if chosen Commissioners at that Assembly. 4. That none be troubled in tlieir ministerie for non-conformity, nor intrants with subscriptions to articles tUl that Assembly. 5. That any brother, Presbyterie, OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 317 or society whatsoever, of the ministery, desirous to send up a petition or grievance to his Majesty,- deliver the same to these Commissioners, under their hand, which they promised faith- fuUy to delyver to his Majesty. It was agreed, that twenty shil lings should be taken off every hunder merks or chalder of victuall of every Bishop's rent or minister's stipends within the kingdome, for a year, to defray their charges. The sincerer sort wold rather have had Mr Alexander Hender son, minister at Leuchers, to be their Commissioner ; but, by the promiscuous voting, the burden was laid upon the other. Yet the Bishops were not content with these articles, and seemed to be offended with the Bishop of Rosse. Rosse went up to Court without bis conjunct Commissioner, and dealt as he pleased in Kirk affairs, or as he was directed by his feUows, the rest of the Bishops. The ministers were urged, notwithstanding, to pay the contribution, as if aU things had been performed ac cording to agreement. To move them, the Bishop of St Andrews, in his missives written to the Presbyteries of Fife, Angus, Strath- ern, &c, had these words, " If ye knew, or wold believe those that knew, his attendance at that tyme for the Church in Court, did more than we are able to requyt ; for, had the adversaries prevaiUed in their designes at that tyme, we should not have knowne where now to find ourselves." How wold these words have been taken if a non-conform minister had written them? Yet many of the ministerie denyed the contribution. What was the negotiation of the Commissioners sent up by them to Court, and how the ministery was abused who contributed to their charges, may be coUected out of the Instructions presented by Mr John MaxweU to the Bishops, the 15th of January 1630. instructions for the clergie of scotland entrusted to mr john maxwell their commissioned Charles Rex. " That they use the Marquesse of Huntly, and the Earles of Ano-us, Nithsdale, Abercorne with discretion, endeavouring by 318 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION fair means to reclame them to the professed rehgion, and not to processe them tiU first his Majesty be acquainted therewith. If any of them give any offence by their insolent carriage or contempt, that his Majesty be acquanted therewith, who wiU not suffer the least wrong nor contempt of that kind. " That the Archbishop of St Andrews consider of the deduction of the processe of excommunication against one Patrick Dickson, servant to the Earle of Angus, seeing his Majesty is informed that the processe is not lawfully deduced. " That Noblemen's wives who are Popishly affected, be not ex- communicat, providing always that their husbands be answerable to the CounseU and Clergie, that they shaU not receive Jesuites, or [Papists in their company,] or be served with such ; and that their Edies shaU give no publick scandaU, but admitt conference with such as, by the Church/ shall be appointed for that effect. " Given at his Majestie's Court of WhitehaU, 6th of November 1629. W. Alexander." One of the Bishops said to such as he pleased, that he had seen the day when there was not a minister in Scotland durst, for his hanging, bring downe such articles ; but he spoke only hke a coun terfeit ; for, within half a year after, he, with the first, directed the same man to Court, and entrusted him with their affaires. He was knowne to be Popish, and they knew very weU he had great credit with Bishop Laud, by whose moyen he was preferred after ward to the Bishoprick of Rosse. When the celebration of the Communion was approaching in Edinburgh, at Easter 1628, motion was made by some of the four Sessions, that it might be celebrate, as it was wont to be cele brate before Perth Assembly ; whereupon the ministers entered in ' capitulation with some of their flock most averse from conformity to the new guise. They craved yeelding in some points, and of- j fered them liberty to sitt or stand, and take out of the minister's hand ; which they offered before. But the people refused to makQ OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 319 any bargain or composition in the matters of God. They wold not quyt the distribution among themselves, lett be countenance the kneeUers in the act of kneeUing. And, therefore, Mr Struther acknowledged there could be no sound peace or heahng of the rent, tUl the least scruple or hair were sweeped to the door. In end, they were content to send up a Supplication to the King for a dispensation and liberty to celebrate after the wonted forme. But it was thought meeter by the honest citizens, with whom they dealt, and by many others also, first to celebrate after the old form, and, thereafter, if his Majesty were offended to entreat his favour, — for their supplication would but irritate his Majesty ; that they should seek a dispensation with his lawes : but the minis ters assured them, that they knew a remedy which wold ding out the bottome of it, in case his Majesty send down a harsh answer. The remedy was to lay downe their ministery ; which they never intended. It came to passe, as was deemed by such as were judicious, that the King sent downe a harsh answer, rebuking, or rather threatening them for such a supphcation. It was thought the ministers had taken this course not of sincerity, but to lay the blame and burden upon the King. They stayed for that year from the celebration of the Communion, because the people were incensed, being disappointed of their hopes. In their supplication they present to his Majesty the lamentable face of the Kirk of Edinburgh, where they were pastors ; that many thousands of their flock do not communicate with them, and of such as do com municate few do kneeU ; that, notwithstanding of their lenitie and discretion to quench the fyre of that schisme, they find it more and more augmented, — so that it is impossible for them any longer to endure these combustions : And, therefore, they desyred his Majesty wold dispense with their obedience to the act of kneeUing, that they may condescend to the weaknesse of their flock, and so may have a comfortable and fruitfuU ministerie in communicating with so good and peaceable a people, who (except this particular) are disposed for all loyaUty and dutifulnesse. 320 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION This supplication was dated and subscribed by all the ministers of Edinburgh, upon the 3d of Aprile 1628. In their instructions given to the bearer and presenter, a worthy gentleman, Mr William Livingstoun, * they desyre him to represent to his Majesty, that yearly they find fewer communi cants, and of the communicants fewer conforme themselves in kneehng ; which was an argument of a growing and not of a de caying division. E his Majesty object that possibly lenity is the cause why so many withdrew themselves from their Com munion, to informe him, that their great number procured their immunity. Among other pitifuU effects of the schisme, to in forme his Majesty, that these are most manifest, 1. Pastor pubhckly enveigheth against pastor, and people carry mutuaU grudge and hatred against other, whereby their doctrine is made fruitlesse. 2. Atheists increase, thinking aU religion to be no thing but a matter of changeable opinion and indifferencie. 3. Papists seeing us in that gesture, having some externaU sym bolizing -with them, are thereby confirmed in their errors, as though our practice were an approaching to them, and an in- gresse to their idolatrie and bread-worship. Mr Sydserff, after he had subscribed, thought he had overseen himselfe, and wished this third point had been omitted ; which he bewrayed by the scraping with his naiU. In end, they desyre the presenter, in case his Majesty take hardly with their supphcation, to represent to his Majesty, in aU humility, what wiU be the dangerous estate of their Kirk, if their supphcation shaU work trouble to weak ones instead of peace. That which was feared came to passe ; and the nixt year they returned to their former course, and some of them became more violent than before, namely, Mr Thomas Sydserff, Mr John Max well, Mr David MitcheU, f who were Popishly affected, and spared * Minister of Lanark. t All three, in the course of time, were advanced to EpiscopaU dignities ; Thomas Sydserff became Bishop of Galloway in 1634 ; Dr John Maxwell, Bishop of Boss in 1633 ; and David Mitchell, (but not till after the Restoration of Charles,) Bishop of Aberdeen. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 321 not to vent Arminianisme and Poperie pubhckly in the pulpits, and indirectly to carp at the doctrine delivered by their colleague, Mr WUliam Struther. Whereupon Mr WiUiam relented in that wherein they were most vehement, that is, the urgeing of the Ceremonies and the people to communicate ; perceaving that the intention of those Popish preachers was to increase the schisme, to augment the fyre, and put aU in a combustion, that they might, with the greater ease and Uberty, vent their erroneous doctrine, and seduce the people : yet wUlingly wold he have embraced a fatt Bishoprick at that very time. GIVEN IN BY SOME IN THEIR NAME TO HIS MAJESTY, OR TO THE ESTATES. Soon after King Charles had entered mto his reigne, some ministers, fearing that his declaration proceeded from misinforma tion, and not from his owne disposition, were carefuU to have him rightly informed of the lamentable estate of our Kirk ; and em ployed such as had great credit to present these Grievances follow ing, or the hke, at sundry occasions, not differing in substance : — " His Majestie's most loveing and loyaU Subjects, the Pastors and other Professors within his Highnesse's Kingdome of Scotland, are heavUy Grieved, — " That some Pastors, after commission granted to ministers to vote in ParUament in the name of the Kirk, not without opposi tion of the better sort, fearing EpiscopaU tyrranny to ensue thereupon, as it was offered, have violently violated the Cautions or conditions prescribed by the GeneraU Assembly, to keep the Commissioner votter in Parliament from corruption. The Ca veats are these foUowing, for their entrie : That the GeneraU Assembly should present to his Majestie six ministers, out of which number his Majesty might make choice of one to any vacant place ; and so forth, as ye have them set downe before. x 322 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION " That, notwithstanding of these Caveats, they rested not till the name of Commissioners was changed with a higher title ; and they styled Lords, one of Orkney, another of Murray, the third of Caithnesse, and so forth. " That to obtain ratification and consent of other Estates in Parliament, they consented to the erection of Abbacies and Prio ries in TemporaU Lordships ; and so not only the rent of the Crowne, so farr as it was aided by the coUectorie, is impared, Kirks and SchooUs impoverished, but also place to vote in Parha ment, in name of the Kirk, made void to a number ; for it was appointed that there should be fifty-one nunisters votters in Par liament, according to the number of Abbots, Priors, and Bishops of old. " That they procured that the GeneraU AssembUes, which before were holden yearly, should be prorogate from tyme to tyme, tUl at last, no definite tyme being indicted, the hberty granted by the laws may be frustrated, and made void in tyme comeing, lest they should be made countable for the breaches of the Caveats made, or to be made. " That not being content with the titles and benefices of Bishop ricks, they encroached, against their own protestations, promise, and the Caveats foresaid, upon the jurisdiction ecclesiasticaU ; first, in acquyring at a Convention of ministers, not authorized with commission from Presbyteries, a perpetuaU precedencie, or mode- ratorship in the Presbyteries where they were ministers ; nixt, in usurping perpetuaU precedencie in SynodaU AssembUes; and, thirdly, in accepting, or, rather, procuring power and commission from his Majestie against their owne promise to fyne, confyne, decerne upon suspension, deposition, deprivation of ministers, and excommunication of whatsoever subjects. " That when they were come to be Lords in Parliament, Coun seU, and Convention of Estates, Barrons, and SpirituaU Lords, Patrons of Benefices, Moderators of Presbyteries, Commissioners in the High Commission, they procured an Assembly to be con vocat, which neither was nor could be free, in respect of this their OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 323 grandeour : and, in this Assembly, (the worthiest of the ministerie being either confyned or banished,) they obtained that Presbyteries might not execute the censures of the Kirk, admitt or deprive ministers without their consent; that neither Presbyteries nor Synods might choose Moderators but such as they should unpose ; that Synods should not assemble but when it pleased them to ap point. " That howbeit that AssembUes, convocated and dressed at their owne pleasure, had no intention to admitt them to the office of a Bishop, yet they, not being content with this alterable power com mitted to them by that Assembly, sent some of their number to EngEnd, to be consecrat to the very office of a Bishop, which had been before damned by our Kirk, that by vertue of that office, and not by any power derived from the Assembly, they might exerce what was granted unto them. These being consecrat, consecrated the rest. " That being thus consecrated, they deserted their owne par ticular flocks, and have ever since exercised, not only that power which was, by fraud and terror, acquyred at that their own As sembly, but also a plenarie power and charge over the whole diocie. " That hereupon they grant liberty to solemnize marriages with out asking of banns ; they urge intrants to the ministerie to sub- scrive seven dangerous articles which were never concluded in any Assembly ; they admitt intrants to the order of priesthood in their owne chappeUs, or nearest kirk to their residence, and not in the presence of the congregation where they should serve, or, it may be, never serve ; they admitt not, nor deprive ministers, with con sent of the ministers of the bounds where the intrant is to be planted, or the delinquent is to be punished, even contrary to the Acts of their own Assembly. " That GeneraU Assemblies being so rarely convocat, and only at their pleasure or procurement, the weightie affairs of the Kirk, treated in Parliaments or Conventions, are turned into their hands, and disponed upon at their arbitriment and pleasure ; so that, with- x2 324 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION out danger and offence, the just grievances of the Kirk, and their humble petitions can neither be presented to our dread Sove- raigne, his Highnesse's Parliament, or Convention of Estates; whereas before it was ordinarie, that whensoever the Kirk had to do, the GeneraU Assembly conveened for such matters as occurred for the tyme. Nixt, they rule over the Kirk without controhnent for want of those Assemblies. " That howbeit the GeneraU Assembly should be convocat, yet can they not be free, so long as they continue in this grandeour, sit as ordinary members not authorised with commission, and overrul ing them, as experience hath taught us. " That SynodaU AssembUes, which were wont to assemble twice in the year, are now prorogat at their pleasure ; others are often- tymes substitute in their place to be Moderators, and, when they are present themselves, they do not so much moderat and gather voices as domineer. For some (as Glasgow) have said, ' Ye may pype as ye wUl, I wUl dance as I please.' Others, (as St An drews,) ' E there were but ten here I wold make an act.' Slight tryaU of ministers and Presbyteries is used; conformity is urged; and other weighty affairs are neglected. " That they disdaine to sit with their brethren in Presbyteries, to exercise the gift of prophecie by course ; that the processes of Presbyteries against offenders are condemned, or frustrated by appeUation to the Bishop, or staying upon his determination, who, if he can be won by the offendar, their processe is cutt short; whereby the censures of the Kirk are contemned, and scandalous offences are multiplyed. " That they have removed worthy men of the Ministerie from their caUing, for no other cause but refusaU of Conformitie to some Ceremonies unknown tUl of late to our Kirk, and suffer ministers following their course, and leaning to their protection, to lye under the fouU scandaUs of drunkennesse and harlotrie. " That intrant ministers, who formerly receaved their places without all suspicion of mercenarie deaUing, enter now at great coast, by soumcs of money given to them, their sons, or their ser- OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 325 vants, for presentations, coUations, testimonEUs of ordination, or admission, to their great hurt. " That they intrude Ministers into vacant places without respect of proportion betwixt the gifts of the intrant and the greatnesse of the cure, and oftentymes against the wUl of the people over whom he is sett, and of the brethren to whose feUowship he is adjoined. " That they admitt such to be Ministers as are either not well quahfied for want of Uterature, or profane and light in their con versation; respecting more the favour of suiters, or their owne commoditie, than the weeU of the flocks. " That they place corrupt Professors in Universities, and Preachers in the most eminent congregations, who infect the hear ers with Arminianisme. " That they flatter such as follow them in the course of Confor- mitie ; and such as wiU not follow, but adhere to their former laud able profession, they disgrace with the odious name of Puritanisme, misinforme his Majesty, disquiet the Kirk which they found in peace, and chopp at the pUlars of his Majesties standing — the favour of God and the love of his best subjects. " That Papists increase under their Government, and are em boldened through their connivence or neghgence, contemning in ferior ministers. " That they have alienated and sold the Patronages of some kirks annexed to their Bishopricks, and set tacks without consent of the Assembhes, and have obtained an Act of ParUament to set the ward lands of the Kirk in tack ward, whereby they purchase great soum.es to themselves, and prejudge their successors of their usual! commodity receaved at the entry of tenents. " That whereas before the Testaments of the defunct were at easie rates, proportionable to the poor condition of the parties, now the prices are raised to a great height, and rigorously exacted. " That when constant Stipends were last modified, they consent ed to the union of sundry kirks, and took soums of money for the same from such as had interest. " That albeit they have taken themselves to the charge of many 326 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Congregations in a diocie, yet some of them are non-residents, as the Bishop of Caithnesse residing in the south Border, at Jedburgh, his diocie lying in the farthest north ; the Bishop of Dunkelden, at St Madoes ; Dumblane, at Holyroodhouse ; Eosse, at Downe be- syde Dundee ; GaUoway, at Leith, and so forth. " That they call Ministers before the High Commission prima instantia, before ever they be heard either in Presbyteries or Synods for non-conformity to any idle ceremony, and punish them either civilly, ecclesiasticaUy, or both wayes, as they think good. " That laying aside all necessary duties, as hospitality, support of the poor schoUers and other indigent persons, and reparation of common works, they imploy the rents of their Bishopricks upon lands to their sons, and high marriages to their daughters. " That by needlesse travelling and pastymes on the Lord's Dayes, contrary to the lawes of God and the countrey, the Sabbath and Service of God is brought in contempt through the evU example of some of them, namely, the Bishop of St Andrews : other scand- aUs we omitt. " Strange visitations from the hand of God, great alterations in the estates of men, and not only hard but bad successe in our most hopefull enterprises, have ever wairned us of the abuses. If they were corrected and speedUy amended, as they have brought univer- saUy great distresse, their removaU might soon turn our mourning into joy, and our grievances into hearty gratulations." Whether any of them that were imployed presented these, or others like these, not different in substance, as they were delyvered by the Ministers to them, as diverse persons were imployed upon sundrie occasions, we are not certain, but so farr as some of them have affirmed, that they were presented and read by his Majesty. But certain we are, that no effect foUowed ; no redresse of any of those enormities, whereat the godly were grieved. The Ministers, dispairing to effectuate any good by deaUing pri- vatly by any particular persons, essayed publict means as occasion offered, in tyme of the Convention of the Three Estates, July 1630. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 327 By their procurement these Grievances foUowing were urged by some noblemen, Eothesse, CassiUs, Seaforth, Yester, Rosse, Bal- merinoch, Melvine, Lowdoun, &c. GENERAL GRIEVANCES TO THE CONSCIENCES OF A GREAT MANY OF HIS MAJESTEE'S SUBJECTS IN THIS KINGDOME, GIVEN IN TO THE CONVENTION OF ESTATES, JULY AND AUGUST 1630. " Since it hath pleased God to blesse the simple forme of divine Worship aUowed by the laws of this countrey, whereby the happy Reformation of reUgion was estabUshed among us, free of the pomp of Ceremonies, with peace and purity of doctrine, it is the humble desire of a great many of his Majestie's subjects, seeing these late Ceremonies brought in upon the Kirk of Scotland were urged no otherwayes but upon assurance of freedome and liberty to aU good Christians to practise them as things indifferent, which both his Majesty of blessed memory, and his Majestie's Commissioners in Parhament and Assembly did pubhckly professe, That the Estates assembled in this present Convention would be pleased to sup- plicat his Sacred Majesty for aUowance of that liberty to pastours and their congregations. " And for this effect, that congregations may not be frustrated of a comfortable ministery, his Majesty would also be petitioned, that worthie and weU quaUfied men be not urged at their entry with any oaths or subscriptions, which are not aUowed by the ex presse orchnance of the GeneraU Assembly. " And finaUy, since his Majesty is graciously pleased to pardon his good subjects aU their bygone offences, that of his RoyaU favour he would also be intreated for the distressed Ministers of this kingdom, that they may be restored to their former liberties and stations for the free exercise of their ministerie." The Noblemen intreated the Estates to concurre with them in petitioning ; whereunto they were very wUUng. But five or six chief CounceUers and Court Lords opposed to the reading of the Grievances, and refused flatly that they should be read ; for they 328 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION understood before what was the effect of then? petition. No doubt they were privie to the King's mind, and were assured that the petition would offend his Majestie. So, howbeit offer was made to hear the grievances of the people ; yet when the greatest grie vance was to be proponed, it was prevented, (fyve or six lords overruling the whole Estates) ; which passed not without chaUenge, but ended without any tumult. It was aUedged, That it was more proper to propone those grievances in tyme of ParUament, which was only a shift; for both the tymes were pertinent. And the King in his Articles offered to hear the grievances of the people, before he made mention of the taxation. Because it was aUedged, that it was more proper for ministers to propone such grievances than for the Estates, as. if the Estates should be carelesse of the Kirk and their owne souls, it was thought good, that a grievance should be given in, in name of the laick patrons, for their interest in the ad mission and deprivation of ministers. The Grievances were given in by my Lord Bahnerinoch the 3d of August 1630, for himself and in name of other laick patrons. " That albeit in the Act of Parhament made in October 1612, the forme of the oath which ministers should give at the time of their admission be expressly sett downe ; yet against the tenor of the said Act of Parliament there is a new form of oath, with certain articles devised and urged upon intrant ministers, whereby the entry to the ministry is shut and closed to the best quahfied men, presented by the patrone, accepted by the people, and willing to enter into that function, if they refuse that new forme of oath ; and thereby others less able are obtruded upon the people. " By the same Act it is ordained, That in deprivation and suspen sion of ministers, the Bishop shall associat to himselfe the ministers of these bounds where the delinquent serveth, and there shaU take tryall of the fault whereof he is chaUenged, and accordingly pro ceed to the deprivation or suspension. Yet neverthelesse against the Act of Parliament, and contrary to the order thereof, ministers are deprived and suspended without any tryaU taken by the Bishop, with the concourse of the ministers of the bounds." OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 329 The equity of this grievance was worthUy mantained and clear ed by the presenter, my Lord of Balmerinoch, assisted by the Noble men above named ; and indeed it is to no purpose to any patrone to present, if, after the person is presented, the Bishop may debarre him for not swearing or subscribing what he thinks good ; or, after he is admitted, if he may suspend or deprive the person presented by him either in the High Commission, or any other way than ac cording to the laws. Yet this grievance was opposed, as the for mer, by the same Lords ; howbeit they understood the body of the Convention was bent to vote in favours of the presenter, or rather, of the Kirk of God sore oppressed with the tyrrany of the lawlesse Prelates, debarring, intruding and extruding ministers as they pleased. The Ministers standing for the purity of religion in doctrine, dis ciphne and worship, having essayed sundry means, but in vain, to have his Majesty informed, thought it necessary to take hold of the opportunity of his coming to his native country to receave a crowne, and to hold his first ParUament, at which times Kings use to be gracious, yea, most gracious to aU their supphcants ; and pre pared some articles to present to the King and Estates in Parha ment. It was ordained, in the year 1594, That four of each Estate should conveen twenty days before the ParUament, to consider the articles and petitions which are to be given in, that such as were reasonable and necessary might be put in forme and presented to the Lords of Articles, in tyme of Parliament, and aU improper, frivolous and impertinent matters might be rejected. But it was not then, nor since determined, who should make choise of the per sons. Yet was not this order observed ; but intimation was made by proclamation upon the 16th of May, that aU such persons as in tend to give in any articles or petitions to the approaching Parha ment, give in the same to the Clerk of Register, betwixt and the first day of June, to be presented by him to such" of the Estates and Counsell as should be appointed to hear and consider the same. Yet those ministers, fearing otherwayes not to be heard, appointed one of their distressed brethren to present their petitions to him ; 330 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION which he did upon the 29th of May, and took instruments in the hands of a nottar, of the presenting and receaving of the same, lest the Clerk should have afterward denyed either the one or the other. That the equitie of the Grievances may be considered by any in different and judicious Reader, I have here inserted them in their full tenor. " Grievances and Petitions concerning the disordered Estate of the Reformed Kirk within this Realme of Scotland, presented upon the 29th day of May 1633, by me, Mr Thomas Hogg, Minister of the EvangeU, in myne own name, and in the name of others of the Ministery likewise grieved, to Sir John Hay, Clerk of Register, to be presented by him to such as ought (according to the order appointed) consider them, that thereafter they may be presented to his Majestie and Estates which are to be assembled at the nixt ensueing Parliament. " The opportunity of this solemne meeting of your gracious Majesty and the honourable Estates, conveened in this High Court of Parliament, and the conscience of our duty to God and the Ee formed Kirk within this realme of Scotland, where we serve by our ministerie, constraine us to present in aU humility to your Highnesse and Estates presently assembled, these our just griev ances and reasonable petitions foUowing : — " 1. Albeit vote in ParUament was not absolutely granted to mi nisters provided to prelacies, but only upon such conditions as his Highness of happy memory, and the GeneraU Assemblies of the Kirk should agree upon, which is evident by the remitt and pro vision expressed in the Act of Parhament holden at Edinburgh in December 1597 : And albeit, the manner of their election and admission to the office of Commissioners, and the particular con ditions and cautions to be observed by ministers, votters in Par liament, in name of the Kirk, after long disputation, were agreed upon by his Majesty present in person, and the GeneraUAssembly, of the state of the kirk. 331 and were appointed by them to be insert in the body of the Act of ParUament, which was to be made concerning that purpose ; some ministers, notwithstanding, have been, and are admitted to vote in ParUament in name of the Kirk, as absolutely as if the Act of Parhament did containe no such reference, and as if his Ma jesty, with the GeneraU Assembly, had not agreed upon their elec tion and admission to that office, or upon any Umitation : Where by the Kirk has sustained great hurt and prejudice in her liberties and privUedges, and especiaUy by their frequent transgressing the first of the conditions,, although grounded upon the very law of nature and nations — That nothing be proponed by them in Par hament, CounseU or Convention, in name of the Kirk, without expresse warrant and direction from the Kirk, under the pain of deposition from their office ; neither shaU they keep sUence, nor consent in any of the said Conventions to any thing that may be prejudiciaU to the liberty and weeU of the Kirk, under the said pain : And the second, That they shaU be bound at every GeneraU Assembly, to give account anent the discharge of their Commis sion since the Assembly preceeding, and shaU submitt themselves to their censure, and stand to thefr determination whatsoever without appeUation, and shaU seek and obtain ratification of their doings at the said Assembly, under the pain of infamie and ex communication : Therefore our humble Supphcation is, that the execution of the Acts of ParUament of matters belonging to the Kirk, to which they have voted in name of the Kirk, without any authority or aUowance from the GeneraU AssembUes of the Kirk, be suspended tUl the Kirk be heard, and that, in tyme coming, ministers have no otherwise vote in ParUament, but according to the provision of the Act of Parliament, and the order of their entrie to the office of that commissionarie, and limitation foresaid agreed upon, as said is. " 2. Seeing ratifications of Acts and Constitutions of the Kirk cannot be construed to be a benefit or favour to the Kirk, unlesse the ratifications passe according to the meaning of the Kirk, and the tenor of the said Acts and Constitutions, without omission, addi- 332 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION tion, or alteration of clauses, articles, or words of importance ; and that in the ratification of the Act of the Assembly holden at GEs- gow, anno 1610, which past in the ParUament holden 1612, under the name of explanation, sundry clauses and articles were omitted, as the subjection of Bishops in aU things concerning their life, conversation, office and benefice, to the censure of the GeneraU Assembly, — the censure of Bishops, in caise they stay the censure of excommunication, — the continueing of the exercise of doctrine weekly,— the necessity of the testificat, — and assistance of the ministerie of the bounds, for the admission of ministers ; and other clauses and articles are added and hisert, as the different degrees of Archbishops and Bishops, the power of giving coUation of bene fices granted to Bishops, the disponeing of benefices falling in their hands jure devoluto, the appointing of Moderators in Dio cesian Synods, in case of their absence, and some words of the oath are changed : by aU which omissions, additions, and altera tions, the Kirk hath sustained, and doth sustaine great hurt in her jurisdiction and discipUne : Our humble desyre therefore is, that the Kirk may be hberate from the prejudice of these omis sions, additions, and alterations of the Act foresaid. " 3. Notwithstanding the GeneraU AssembUes have been holden from the tyme of the Reformation tiU the year 1603, at least once in the year, and oftner, pro re nata ; ProvinciaU Synods twice in the year ; weekly meetings for exercises, and Presbyteries every week, for matters to be treated in them respective, and their liber ties were ratified in Parhament, anno 1592 — and by that as a most powerfuU mean, blessed be God ! j>eace and purity of rehgion were maintained: And in the Assembly holden at Glasgow 1610, their Commissioners, voters in Parhament, provided to Prelacies, were made lyable to the censures of the GeneraU AssembUes — it was acknowledged, that the necessity of the Kirk craved that there should be yearly GeneraU AssembUes ; and the ministerie were then assured, that that liberty wold be granted upon their request, whereby they were induced to condescend so farr to the Act then made, as they did; which Act also beareth, in the very OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 333 entrie thereof, a request to his Majesty, that Generall AssembUes may be holden in aU tyme coming, once in the year, or precisely at a set and certain tyme : Neverthelesse, the wonted liberty of holding GeneraU AssembUes is suppressed ; the order of the Pro vinciaU Synods confounded ; Presbyteries in a great part disorder ed and neglected, whereby divisions have entered into the Kirk ; ministers are become neghgent in their callings, and scandalous in their Uves ; the godly are heavUy grieved ; the weak scandalized ; erroneous doctrine is deUvered in kirks and schools without con- trolment ; the Commissioners, voters in ParUament, lye untryed and uncensured ; and Atheisme and Poperie increase : Our hum ble desire is, therefore, that the Acts of ParUament made in favours of the AssembUes of the Kirk, and especiaUy the Act of Parhament holden at Edhiburgh in June 1592, be revived in this present ParUament. " .4. Notwithstanding the observation of festivaU days, private Baptisme, private Communion, EpiscopaU confirmation of chUdren, have been rejected by this our Reformed Kirk, since the beginning of the Reformation ; and it hath been declared by Act of Parha ment 1567, that such only were to be acknowledged members of this Reformed Kirk, as did participate of the Sacraments as they were then rightly ministered, which was without kneeUing, in the act of receaving the SacramentaU Elements of the Supper, or im mediately dispensing the same to every Communicant by the mi nister ; and that it was statute and ordained in the same ParUa ment, that aU Kings should give their oath at their coronation, to maintain their reUgion then professed, and that forme of the mi nistration of the Sacraments which then was used : Neverthelessej pastors and people, adhereing to their former profession and prac tice, are nicknamed Puritans, and threatened not only without any good warrant, but beside the tenor of the Act of Perth Assem bly, which containeth no strict injunction, and, contrary to the meaning of the voters, and to the proceedings of that Assembly, where it was professed that none should be pressed with obedience to that Act. Therefore we humbly intreat, that by ratification of 334 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION the Acts of Parliament made before that Assembly, and by such wayes as shall seem good to your gracious Majesty, and honourable Estates assembled, your Majestie's good people, pastors, and pro fessors, may both be purged from such fouU aspersions, and may be freed from aU dangers and fears which may occur by occasion of that Act of Perth. " 5. Albeit it be determined by the GeneraU AssembUes of this our Reformed Kirk, what oaths ministers should take at the tyme of their admission or ordination, yet there is a new forme of oath devised and urged by the admitters or ordainers upon intrants to the ministrie, togither with subscription to certain articles devised by them, without direction and warrant from any Assembly of the Kirk, yea, or Act of ParUament, whereby the entry to the minis terie is shut upon the best qualified, and others lesse able are ob truded upon the people, to their great grief and hazard of their souls : Our humble petition therefore is, that aU such oathes and subscriptions, urged upon ministers at their entrie or transplanta tion, may be discharged. * " 6. Notwithstanding there be constitutions of the Kirk, and lawes of the countrey for censuring of ministers before the ordinary judicatories ecclesiasticaU, yet, contrary to their order, ministers are suspended, silenced and deprived, and that for matters meerly ecclesiasticaU, before other judicatories, which are not estabhshed by the authority or order of the countrey and Kirk : Therefore our humble petition is, that ministers deserving censure be no other wayes censured than the order of the Kirk does prescrive ; and that such as are otherwayes displaced, be suffered to serve in the ministerie as before." The presenter attended in Edinburgh to compear, if need were, before such as should have conveened according to the proclama tion ; but there was no appearance of any such Convention. We * A part of the document is here omitted, for which see Row's History, pp. 360, 361, Wodrow Society edition. In the old printed copy of the Grievances, dated 1633, Article 5 corresponds with the above text. OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 335 heard that only four or five Officers of Estates consulted apart to gither; but upon what, we know not. Because it was provided by the said Act 1594, that howsoever the Convention of four of each Estate might reject what they thought frivolous and impertinent, yet his Majesty may alwayes present such articles as he thinks good concerning himself for the weeU of the realme ; the ministers directed their brother above- named, to present to his Majesty their supphcation ; which he did upon the 15th day of June 1633, in the castle of Dalkeith, that day that he was to make his entrie into Edinburgh. The King read it at length, and seemed nowayes to be displeased ; but after some conference betwixt the Earle of Morton and him, the Earle came to the presenter, and asked at him what was his name, and parted from him with these words, " I wish you had chosen another place than this house for the presenting of your Supphcation :" whereby it seemed, then, that the King was not content to have seen it. Let the indifferent Reader judge upon the Supphcation, if there be in it a word or syUable to offend. " This happie occasion, with strong desires long waited for by us, your Majestie's most loving and humble subjects, the pastors and professors of the Reformed ReUgion within this your Majestie's kingdome of ScotEnd : The great fame which hath often fiUed our ears, of your Majestie's most pious and princely inclination to reli gion and righteousnesse, whence this Kirk and kingdome, from their singular interest in your Majestie's birth and baptisme, have reason to look at this tyme for a comfortable influence, the body of this kingdome in heart joineing with us, and only waiting for the least word from your Majestie's mouth : The conscience which we have, and which, we trust, is manifest to aU men, that we are seeking neither riches nor honor to ourselves, but that the summe and substance of our desires is, to procure the advancement of the kingdome of Jesus Christ, and to see your Majestie's flou rishing estate in your kingdomes : AU these and each of them move us to entreat, in aU humUity, your gracious Majesty to be favour able to our petitions, which we have dehvered to the Clerk of 336 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION Register, to be presented to your Majesty and the Estates at the approaching Parliament, that they may be considered, and receave a gracious answer." Because there went rumours of novations intended and to be established in Parliament, these ministers laid open to sundrie of the nobility, gentrie and burgesses their fears, and desired them to consider what rent and division hath entered into the Kirk by ratification of Acts of AssembUes controverted among the minis- trie, or rather reputed nuU in themselves ; how division increas- eth by ratification of former Acts of ParUament, confirming the constitutions of those AssembUes : and therefore desyred that all such ratification should be suspended, tUl there be a free GeneraU Assembly to compose the controversies of the Kirk, or tUl both par ties be heard in face of ParUament ; and, namely, the ratification of the Act of Parliament 1612, ratifieing the Act of Glasgow 1610 ; the Act of Parliament 1621, ratifying the Act of Perth Assembly 1618 ; and, for the same reason, the ratification of the Assembly holden at Aberdeen 1616, and consequently, of the new Confession of Faith, Catechisme, Service-book, Canons for Disciphne, or any other novations which may be brought in under the colour of that Assembly. Because it was feared that the High Commission may be authorised, they were informed that it hath been and wold be the more prejudiciaU to the ordinarie judicatories, and bring the Kirk under great thraldome ; that thereby power is given to minis ters to censure their brethren against the order of the Kirk, and in causes wherein they may be both judge and partie ; that there by ministers take power to fyne, confyne, imprison, &c, which is nowayes pertinent to the ministers of the gospeU ; how that this long tyme the Kirk hath been holden m slavery by that Court, notwithstanding the Act of ParUament 1584 hath discharged aU jurisdictions and judgments not approved by Parliament. Because it was intended, and yet stiU is intended, that moe ministers have place in Parhament, as titular Abbots, Priors, &c, to make up the number of fifty-one votters, they were desyred to consider how dangerous it were both for Kirk and Commonwealth, if that Estate ¦ OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 337 were strengthened with such a number, and how great a wrong it is to the Kirk to admitt any moe, till the ministers already ad mitted to vote be brought within the compasse and under the obedience of the conditions agreed upon by the King and the Ge nerall Assembly, according to the provision of the Act of Parlia ment 1597 ; and so much the rather, because it was more than manifest what harme the Kirk had sustained by their unbounded and uncontroUable proceedings. Because it was feared that the Bishops, with some ministers, their adherents, wold propone arti cles and petitions as directed from the Kirk, they were desired to consider that it was proper to the GeneraU Assembly to pro pone articles and petitions to the Parliament in name of the Kirk, and it hath been their custome to conveen before ParUament, and in their meetings to agree upon matters to be proponed, and to appoint Commissioners to present the same ; whereby it was evi dent that no Commissioners from Conventions of Bishops and mi nisters, were their number never so great, should be admitted with out authority of the said Assembly, especiaUy in a tyme when they have procured the GeneraU Assembly to be interrupted, and the hberty of the Kirk to indict Assemblies ratified by Acts of Parlia ment, to be made of no force. Because it was to be feared that an new translation of the Psalmes in Meeter was to be imposed, they were desired to consider, that the Psalmes in Meeter, aUowed by the Kirk of Scotland, and usually sung since the Reformation, cannot be altered by inferior AssembUes of the Kirk, or particular persons ; neither can it be remitted or committed to Synods, Pres byteries, or certain selected persons, tiU there be a free General Assembly. Little good was to be looked for, for the satisfaction of the minis ters amongst the Lords of the Articles, when the Bishops made choise of the noblemen, of which some were Papists, and eight Bishops were nominat to the nobiUty by the ChanceUour. The noblemen were desired by some statesmen not to oppose to such Commissioners of Barrons and Burgesses, as the King had given them in list, and such were chosen for the most part, and with this Y 338 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION number the Officers of Estate were to sit. After they had sitten two or three dayes, some of their number kvformed their acquaintance, that two articles had past amongst them : One concerning habits to be enjoined to churchmen by the King ; another concerning the ratification of aU Acts made before in favour of the Church, which, consequently, was a ratification of the Act of Perth, and other Acts made for the setthng and advancement of the estate of Bishops. Two Noblemen, two Barrons, two Burgesses, purposed to present to the King a petition in their own name, and in name of many other Noblemen, Barrons, and Burgesses, to supphcate that the late novations brought in into our Kirk, with assurance of free- dome and indifferencie of practice from the Commissioners, both in > the Assembly and ParUament, authorized by his Majestie's father, may, by his Majestie's pubhck declaration in Parhament, have no other strength nor execution hereafter, and that Pastors and Pro fessors may be freed from the fear of any further novations, lest, if either the burden of many inconveniences afready felt, by urgeing the former, remaine on them, or the honest hearts of his loyaU j subjects be overcharged with farther, this hE native kingdome be left in heavinesse. But they, being certified by such as tryed Ms minde, and shewed him a coppie of this petition, that he wold sett himselfe against them, they desisted, and reserved themselves to the Parliament. Nothing may come in pubUck to be voted in ParUament, but that which is approved by the Lords of the Articles, nor to be reasoned and voted amongst the Lords of the Articles, which is suppressed by the Lords of the Grievances, conveened before the sitting downe of the Parliament, according to our order. So the Ministers Grievances were suppressed. The Noblemen, Barrons and Burgesses, had no space granted to them, after the rising of the Lords of the Articles, to advise upon other conclusions, but behoved to give tlieir advice, and vote after the reading of them in publict, upon the last day of the ; Parliament, which was the 28th of June. When the Earle of Rothesse craved, that the article concerning AppareU might be OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 339 severed from the Act concerning the King's RoyaU Prerogative, because some might consent to the one who wold not consent to the other, it was refused ; and, therefore, many of the nobility, gentrie and burgesses, voted against the Act, as it was conceaved conjunctly, howbeit the Act was carryed by plurality of votes, whereof some that were present doubt much to this hour. When the Act concerning the ratification of the Uberties of the Kirk, and Acts made in favour of religion, were read, it was asked by the Earle of Eothesse, If there was no Act to be excepted, or if the Act of Perth might be excepted ? It was answered, That no exception was to be made : whereupon aU the persons almost who voted against the former Act, disassented also from this generaU ratification. The assenters for the most part were Noblemen, no representative persons of any corporation; Bishops usurping. a re presentation of the ministrie, who. ought not to have had voice at aU in Parhament, lett be to vote in their owne cause ; Officers of Estate and some of them voteing twice, once as noblemen, and again as Officers of Estate ; some Englishmen who have not a i foot-breadth of land in Scotland; some noblemen who had no other means whereby to recover their ruinous estates ; sundry Lords and Viscounts seeking to be created Earles. Such as dis sented were assaulted sundry wayes, either in private by their friends, parents, or near kinsman. Some of them had promises made to them before, to be dignified with the titles of Earles, but were delayed tUl after the Parliament. The King's inchnation r and pleasure was very weU knowne to aU the members of the Parliament, and yet, notwithstanding, they uttered their disassent freely : yea, some of the assenters have consented since the rising of the Parhament, that they voted for fear of the King's displea- * sure. The King taking pen and paper in hand, in the tyme of the voteing, was a sufficient ground of apprehending fear. i,l The ratification of the Act 1609 doth not conceme surplice or ; any other superstitious vesture, to be used in tyme of divine service, but of the habits of clergymen, to be used either in the , streets or in the Kirk, or in their journeyes and wayfareing ; for y2 340 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION no more was ratified than was injoyned by the Act, anno 1609, and only that part which concerned the habit of the kirkmen. But the intent of that Act was not to give the King power to injoyne sur plice, or any superstitious vesture, as the judicious Reader may easUy perceave in the reading of the Act. That Act determined that preachers should wear black; it was not then left to the King to impose white, but only the forme of their appareU. By that Act, ministers are ordained to provide themselves of the ap pareU to be prescribed, according to their estate and moyen. Ministers were never burdened for provideing to themselves sur plices or the like vestures, but were provided at the charge of the parochiners, as may be seen in the decrees of the Popish Coun- seUs, and late Constitutions of the Kirk of England. If the words of the Act may be extended to the surphce, it may be extended also to aU the rest of the priest's masse vestiments ; for there is no word in the Act to import the surphce more than the rest. It is likely that surplices were aimed at before the Bishops were armed with the power of the High Commission, or the power they pre tend committed to them by the Assembly of Glasgow. The meaning, then, of these words of the Act of Ratification, " to be used and worne at the tymes, and in the manner expressed in the said Act," is nothing else but that they shaU use such formes and fashions at different tymes, and in different places, as shaU be pre scribed to them ; because one forme and fashion wUl not be con venient and commodious for them at aU tymes, and in aU places, in the kirk, in the streets, in their journeyes. Therefore in the late Constitutions of the Kirk of England, confirmed by King James, it is prescribed what gowns they shaU wear in the streets ; what cloathes in their journeyes ; what in private houses and studies ; what graduates shaU wear in tyme of prayer, preaching and minis tration of the sacraments agreeable to their degrees ; what minis ters who are not graduat shaU wear. And yet they had reason to vote against the Act. The sight of capes and surplices in the * ChappeU, the Abbey Kirk, and the Great Kirk before, gave them just cause to apprehend the worst. Nixt it seemeth an injury done OF THE STATE OF THE KIRK. 341 to ministers, that forms of habit should be imposed upon them without their owne advice and consent, at the pleasure of the Prince. What if he shaU command them to be conforme in their habits to Popish Priests, or to wear hoods and beUs ? Thirdly, What reason was there to grant that power to the King and his suc cessors, and so to make it a royal prerogative ; which was granted to King James only, for his incomparable wisdome and great ex perience, as the Act 1609 beareth. Fourthly, That Act, so farr as it concerned judges, magistrates, &c. was not renewed and ratified. Only poor ministers are left to be ordered in their habits, at the pleasure of Princes. By the Act of ratification of the Act of former Acts of ParUa ment, made in favour of the Kirk, the Articles of Perth Assembly cannot be urged ; for n Gratification can be pretended to be made in favours of the Kirk or religion presently professed, if it bind with pains and p'enalties [that] which the Kirk hath left free, and where- anent that pretended Assembly gave only counseU and advice. The Act of Glasgow 1610, as it is ratified in Parhament, cannot be caUed ane Act ratified in favours of the Kirk ; because the most im portant clauses are omitted, and others added, and so it is another Act, and not the Act of the Kirk. Many Acts were made without the knowledge or consent of any GeneraU Assembly, which is the only representative Kirk within this realme, to whose censure the Bishops themselves are lyable. Sundry Acts have been made con trary to the Acts of the Kirk, as Election of Bishops by Deans and Chapters ; which forme of election hath been condemned by our Kirk in purer tymes, and free AssembUes, togither with the office itselfe of a Dean. Some Acts have been ratified, notwith standing ministers have protested against them. And sometymes ministers have been charged to depart out of the towne where the Parhament did sitt, and were not heard when they wold have opposed. Can any such Acts be said to be made in favours of the Kirk and rehgion presently professed ? Can such Acts be pretended to be ratified in favours of the Kirk and rehgion presently profess ed, when the whole bodie of the professors, scarce the tenth part 342 APOLOGETICAL NARRATION, &C. excepted, are averse from the observation of the same ? On the contrary, if aU Acts made truly in favours of the Kirk be ratified, then the Act concerning the King's Oath at his Coronation, often ratified, and many others Acts not yet abrogate, which were made at the instant desyre of the Kirk, are ratified ; of which number there are sundrie mentioned in the first Act of Parhament 1581, and sundrie others since. But how are these put in execu tion, and why was not the Act concerning the King's oath at his Coronation often ratified, not put to execution at the last ParUament ? FINIS. CERTALNE RECORDS TOUCHING THE ESTATE OF THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND, SINCE THE REFORMATION OE RELIGION THEREIN, TILL THE PARLIAMENT HOLDEN AT PERTH, ANNO 1606. WRITTEN BE THAT FAITHFULL SERVANT AND WITNES OF CHRIST, MR JOHN FORBES. CERTALNE RECORDS TOUCHING THE ESTATE OF THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND. THE FIRST BOOKE. CAP. I. THE HAPPIE ESTATE OF THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND, AFTER THE REFORMATION OF RELIGION. ' It is not long since the Lord, who worketh aU things efter the good pleasour of his own wiU, did in mercie visit this kingdome of Scotland, translating it into the kingdome of his dear Son, and delyvering it from the power of darknes, both in sic measour and maner, as no natioun under heaven ever enjoyed the presence of God in greatter glory, so universaUie with such Ubertie, with such a blissing, the whole kingdome being purged from oppen idolatrie, superstition, and humane inventions, and utterlie freed from the tyranie of that man of sinn, who long had keiped it in a miserable bondage of the mynd : So that not only did the light of the Gos peU, in the puritie and trueth of doctrine, prevaUl to the subdew- ing therof to the obedience of faith, that God might be worshipped in spirit and trueth, according to his wUl revealled in his Word, but aUso to the establishing of that only lawfull, decent, and comly forme and ordour of government in the house of God, prescryved be Christ and practised be his Apostles, with the utter overthrow of all antichristian hierarchie, lordly preheminence amongst pastors, 346 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE Popishe government, and whoU image of the beast, that justhe might this natioun have sung a new song of praises unto the Lord, confessing that he had not dealt so with every natioun, no not with any since the beginning. Beside this, for the farder comfort . of his Kirk, it pleased the Lord, in this tyme of grace and hght, to bring into the world our gracious Soveraigne King James, who, in the mercie of God, reigneth presenthe, as a chyld of Ught, being brought foorth in the light, and nourished in the bossome of his Kirk, with the sinceir mUk of the Word, appoynted and prepaired so of God, a meitt defendar of his natioun, saveing trueth, and a fitt nourishing father to his Church, (Esa. 60,) by just recom- pence : who, as before he had beine fed on her breasts with that food that nourishes his soull unto eternaU lyfe ; so againe to make her, as his mother, to reap that promissed bhssing, in causeing her to suck of his breasts protectioun, prosperitie, and peace. In performing of whilk dewtie (knowing that the Lord hath appoynt ed Kings to minister to his Church, and that the natioun and king- dome that will not serve her saU perishe,) his Majestie did show himselff so fordward, as nothing was left by him or any wayes omitted that, in a Prince so blessed of God, could be requyred, in so far, that not only in his Majestie's minor age, under Regents, governours, bot speciaUie efter the takeing of the reignment and government in his own hands, and in his perfyte aige, both the trueth of doctrine, sinceritie of ordour and government, and aU the priviledges, freedome, and immunities of the trew Kirk of God, speciaUie in the spirituaU jurisdiction therof, according as they have been in practise since reformation of religion in this kingdome, have beine oft and diverse tymes explained, ratified, and confirmed, and all contrarie, both doctrine, and discipline, and jurisdiction, expresslie disallowed and discharged; as, namelie, in the 1st Parliament, Acts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, wherin at length is contained the substance of doctrine, and description of the trew Kirk ; in the 2d Pari. Act 2 ; and in the 3d Pari. Act 46, 47 ; in the 5th Pari. Act 1 ; in the 6th Pari. Act 1, 2 ; in the 7th Pari. Act 1 ; in the 11th Pari. Act 2 ; in the 12th Pari. Act 1 ; in the 13th Pari. Act 2 ; ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 347 in the 14th Pari. Act 2 ; in the 15th Pari. Act 1. And for the far der manifestation of his Majestie's fervent zeall to the glory of God and advancement of the kingdome of Christ, the Buik of Disci phne observed in this kingdome, penned be the Kirk, efter long and mature deliberation, being presented to his Majesty and his Privie Counsall the zeir of God 1578, was, by his Hienes graciouslie accepted, and approven, and ordained to be registrat in the buUces of the Assembly GeneraU ; whilk therefter was done in the Gene raU Assembly halden at Glasgow in the month of Apryll 1581, with the consent and approbatione of the Laird of Caprentoun, his Majestie's Commissioner ; wher likwayes was presented, be Mr Craig, his Majestie's minister, and the said Laird of Caprentoun, in his Majestie's name, that notable Confessioun of Faith, caUed the King's Confession, efter that the Estaite of Bishopes was utterhe abohshed at the Assembly at Dundee, the zeir preceiding 1580; in the whilk Confession, besyd the rest of antichristian errors, that Romish hierarchie is utterlie abjured, and the govern ment then present of the Reformed Kirk in this land, and disci phne therof, approved, Unbraced, subscryved, and sworn to, be his Majesty's selff, as wUUng, not only by law to authorise, but also, by practise in his Hienes's own persone, to perswade obedience to the Kirk of God, according to his Word, in all his Majesty's sub jects ; whUk Confessioun was, by his Majesty's pubhck authoritie, universallie unbraced, sworn and subscryved be his Majesty's Nobillitie, Household, and whole Estaites of this land ; by the whUk they all remaine most straitlie obleidged under no less paine then the danger, both of bodie and soull, in the day of God's fearfuU judgment, to continue in the obedience both of the doctrine and discipline of this Kirk, and to defend the same, according to their vocatioun and power, all the dayes of ther lyves, according as, in the said Confessioun, is expresshe contained. And, for the farther promoving of the kingdome of God, and lawfuU jurisdiction of the Kirk in his Majesty's dominions, his Hienes did send to the said Assemblie at Glasgow, with his forsaid Commissioner, a Platt of the Presbitries to be established through the whole realme, com- 348 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE manding Commissioners to be directed from the said Assembly to concurr with sic as [his] Majesty sould appoynt for planting of the saids Presbitries in every province of the kingdome ; whilk was ac- cordinglie done. And least any man sould be ignorant what is the Jurisdiction Ecclesiastick, and ordour of government so solemnly imbraced, his Majesty hes particularlie defined the same, first in the year 1579, 6 Pari. Act 2, declairing it to consist in the preach ing of the trew word of Jesus Christ, correction of maners, and administration of the Holy Sacraments, and ordained therin that no uther EcclesiasticaU Jurisdiction be acknowledged within this realme than that whilk then was and sould be within the said Kirk, whilk then was, be the favour of God, in the said kingdome, in respect, as in the said Act is contained, his Majestie and Estaites did declair ther was no uther face of Kirk nor uther face of rehgion then was presenthe then estabhshed within this realme. Bot most amply and clearlie the said jurischstion, in aU the severaU Assembllies therof, als weUl particular of every congregation, of moe in one Presbitrie, of particular provinces, of the GeneraU As sembllies of the wholle land, are both defyned and ratified in the first act of his Majestie's 12 Pari, the 1592 ; in the whUk the Ge neraU Assembllies appoynted be the Kirk are ratified, and it de claired to be lawfuU to the Kirk, and ministers, every zeir at least and ofter, pro re nata, as occasion and necessitie sail requyre, to hauld and keip GeneraU AssembUes, provyding that his Majestie, or his Commissioners with them to be appoynted be his Hienes, being present at Uk Generall Assembly, befor the dissolving therof, nominat and appoynt tyme and place when and wher the nixt Generall Assembly shaU be halden"; and in caice neither his Majesty nor his Commissioner beis present for the tyme in that town, where the said GeneraU Assembly beis halden, then and in that caice, it saU be lawfuU for the said GeneraU Assembly be themselffes, to nominat and appoynt the tyme and place where the nixt General Assembly of the Kirk sail be keiped and halden, as they have beine in use to do thir tymes bypast. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 349 CAP. IE THE FIRST BEGINNING OF THE DECAY LN THE GOVERNMENT AND JURISDICTION ECCLESIASTICK. Thus for a long space by the fordward zeaU and rair pietie of so exceUent a Prince, and by the faithfuU labours and diUgent watch- fullnes of uncorrupt pastours, the work of God did prosper, and grow to such perfection, as the Kirk of God in this land might justhe have beine caUed the Lord's deUght, the place whilk he loved more than aU the habitations of Jacob, and the very praise of the world : whilk Sathan greatly envying, did ever endeavour, both with head and taUl, to interrupt, yet to no great effect, the Lord still so rulleing the heart of the King, and guyding and holding the starres in his right hand, that neither heresie nor schisme did enter the House of God for the space allmost of [fifty] zeires ; notwithstanding, that the enemies of the trueth, the lo custs sent out of the smoke of that bottomles pitt be their King Abaddon, did greatly labour, both to pervert the trueth, and turne his Majesty's heart from the trew profession thereof; so that about the 1584, by oft suggestion of subtiU flatterers, and godles Atheists, his Majesty was maid something to mislyke that lawfull ordour of government of God's House so estabUshed be his Word, and practissed of his ApostUes, received in this land, ratified be law, imbraced, subscryved, and sworne in most solemne manner by covenant, with the hving God be his Majestie, and haUl Estaites of the kingdome, as only lawfuU and righteous, aUowed of God ; and was brought to esteime more of that lordUe domination of Bishops. The mean used as most meit to work this perswasion in his Majestie's heart was this, That there could be nothing so con trair to the nature of a monarchic, and more dangerous to the peace, and prejudiciaU to the dignitie of his RoyaU Estaite, than that paritie of authoritie in pastours. And so dispairing to change his Majesty's mynd from the trueth of Doctrine, they subtiUie did steall away his heart from the sinceritie of Discipline, whilk, 350 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE hitherto, had beine the cheife stay and bulwark both of the Kirk and religion. Heirupon, in the 1584 year foresaid, foUowed that first and great eclypse of the beautie and comUnes of order, by continuaU prac tise observed in the zeirlie AssembUes of the Kirk (once at least) from the 20th of December 1560 unto the 1584 ; procured not only by sic secular persones, as then through the iniquitie of tyme overrulled aU, bot greatly promoved be sic in the Kirk as had un braced this present world, speciaUie Mr Patrick Adamson, Bishop of St Andrews, and David Cunynghame, Bishope of Aberdeine, Montgomrie, Bishop of Glasgow, who, (as the confession of the said Mr Patrick Adamsone, penned by himself and subscribed with his owne hand, given in to the Synod of Fyfe, and efterward printed, does witnes,) declaires, that being moved pairtlie through ambition and vain glorie, to be preferred to their brethreine, and pairtlie for covetousnes, did undertake the office of Bishoprick. At this tyme, the cheiff men and principali stoupes, both of Kirk and Commonwealth being forced to forsake the land, divers lawes were maid in prejudice of the Kirk of God, to stay their Assein- bUies without his Majesty's hcence obtained to that effect ; whilk hitherto had beine keiped upon the warrand that Christ hes given to his Kirk, to conveine without any Ucence, sought or given to the magistrat uther nor the approven common consuetude, every Assembly on the end designing tyme and place for the nixt, accord ing to the Buik of DiscipUne : As aUso, to bring the judgment of aU matters, als weill ecclesiastick as civiU, in to his Majesty, and his Counsell, and to establishe Bishops, and uther Commissioners constitute be his Majesty, judges in ecclesiasticaU causes. These foresaid Bishops, speciaUie Adamsone, laboured, (as his confession in print bears,) to subject the kirkmen unto the King's ordinance, in things of conscience and matters ecclesiasticaU ; teaching aUso the Presbitries to be ane foolishe invention. And for the farder sure- tie of the Estaite of Bishopes, the said David Cunynghame, be advyse of the said Adamsone, (as his confession bears,) did rent out some leaffes out of the Buikes of the AssembUies, and destroyed ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 351 sic things as maid against their Estaite ; and divers Acts wer urged to be subscryved be aU ministers, contrair to the lawfuU authoritie and free jurisdiction of the Kirk. In this estait of tyme, was that Act amongst the rest maid, whUk is the first in the 8 Pari, halden at Edinburgh, the 22d of Maii 1584, wherin his Majesty, his aires and successors, be themselffes, and their CounseUers, are statute judges competent to all persones in aU matters ; and wherin it is ordained, that none presume to declyne his Majesty's or his Coun seU's judgment, under the paine of treasoun. What wonder, " seeing in many things we sinn aU," (Ja. 3,) ail- though in such a tyme his Majesty sould have beine brought to such things, being so much provoked therto by these who albeit preachours themselffes, yet were so farr bhnded as the foresaid Confession beares, that they beleived the government of the Kirk to be lyke into the kingdoms of the earth, (plaine contrair to the command of our Master, Christ,) and the monarchic of the Kirk whereby it is governed, not to be only in Christ our Saviour, the only Head, Lord and King of Saints, set over Syon for ever, bot in the ministers who are nothing bot vassaUs under him in ane equalhtie among themselffes. CAP. HI. THE RESTAURATION OF THE KIRK TO HER WONTED LIBERTIE IN THE TREWEST GOVERNMENT. Yet did not the Lord suffer his Majesty long to be carryed with the flood of iniquitie whilk then overflowed, nor his Kirk to lye under that bondage ; bot in his justice removed the wicked instru ments, and in mercy restored both Kirk and Comonwealth to their wounted integritie ; so that in the yeir 1590 his Majesty, consi dering aU things more deiply, did cause againe publishe the former Confession of Faith, with ane chairge to every pastour under paine of tinseU of fourtie pound, * that should not cause publishe it * " Upon the paine of loosing four pound of his stipend." Gibson's MS. 352 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING TOE of new, togither with ane generall Band to be sworn and sub scryved to of aU men. And in the zeir 1591, the cheif author of the former disorder, Mr Patrick Adamson, who had been excom municated 1589, being humbUed be the hand of God, was brought to a willing recantation of aU his errors, and compeUed to justifie the King, in confessing himselff to be the author of the buik called " The Declaration of the King's Majestie's Eitention," and that it contained nothing of the King's own Intention, bot of his own at the tyme of the wrytting thereof, and the corrupt intentions of such as, for the tyme, wer about the King and abused his minoritie; confessing plainhe, that in that whoU buik is contained nothing bot assertions of hes, ascryving to the King's Majesty that whereof he was not culpahUe ; and condemning that pairt of the Declara tion wherein soveraigne and supream power is said to appertaine to the King's Majesty in matters EcclesiasticaU, as ane thing un- worthie to be contained among Christian acts, — and that uther pairts touching Presbitries and Bishops, acknowledging plainhe, the one to be authorized be Christ and warranted be his Word, Matt, xviii., so that, albeit the Acts of ParUament did forbid it, the Kirk sould rather obey God nor man, — and the uther, to wit, Bishops to have no warrand of the Word of God, bot to be grounded upon the pohcie and inventions of men, and worthy to be disaUowed and condemned as impertinent to the office of a sin- ceir pastour of God's Word, and the cheif caus whilk these fyve hundreth yeirs bypast, hath, in every country, suppressed the Word of God ; and therfor, he condemneth his own Commentare upon the 1st of PauU's Epistles to Timothie, becaus it tends to aUow of the Estait of Bishops, utherwayes then God's Word can suffer ; and doeth confesse himselff to have bein the author of the Act dis- chairging the ministers stipends that did not subscryve to the acts maid at that tyme, 1584, and that he was more bussie with some Bishops of England to the prejudice of the discipline of this Kirk, pairtlie whUl he was ther, and pairtlie by mutuaU inteUigence, then becam a good Christian, meiklle less a faithfuU pastour. Yea his Majestie did, moreover, give sufficient proof of his innocencie, ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 353 anno 1592, wherein be Act of Parliament he restored the Kirk to her fuU Ubertie of Jurisdiction in aU matters and causses Eccle siasticaU ; ratified and approved the GeneraU Assemblies thereof to be holden, once at least, every zeir ; SynodaU and Provincial! AssembUes to be halden twyse every zeir, in every province of the realme ; and aUso, the Presbitries and particular Sessions ap poynted be the said Kirk, with the whoUe jurisdiction and dis cipUne of the same Kirk, aggreed upon be his Majestie in a con ference had with the ministers to that effect ; the speciaU articUes wherof are mentioned in the said Act. Heir first began his Majes ty, or his Commissioner, to have vote with the AssembUe in the nomination of tyme and place of the nixt AssembUe, according to the provision of the said Act in caice of ther presence. Moreover, in the said Act, his Majestie abrogates, cassis, and anuUes aU Acts maid for maintenance of superstition and idoUatrie, and aU lawes and statutes maid at any tyme befor the day and dait therof, against the Ubertie of the trew Kirk, jurisdiction and disci pline therof, as the same is used and exercysed within this realme ; and specialhe declaires that the forsaid Act, being the threteenth Act of the Parhament halden at Edinbrough the 22d of MaU 1584, saU no wayes be prejudiciaU, nor derogate any thing to the privUedge that God hes given to the SpirituaU office-bearers in the Kirk concerning heads of religion, matters of heresie, excommunica tion, collation, or deprivation of ministers, or ony sicklyk e.ssentiaU censures, speciaUie groundit, and having warrand of the Word of God ; and utterhe abrogats the Act of the said Parhament halden at Edinbrough the said 1584, granting commission to Bishops and uther judges constitute in EcclesiasticaU causses, to resave presen tations to benefices and give coUation theron, and to put ordour to aU causses EcclesiasticaU ; and declaires the same to be expyred in the selff, to be nuU in tyme coming, and of none avaUl, force, nor effect : And specialUe ordaines aU presentations to benefices to be directed to the particular Presbitries in aU tyme coming, with fuU power to give collation therupon, and to put ordour to all matters and causses EcclesiasticaU within their bounds, according to the z 354 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE discipline of the Kirk ; and decemes and declaires the forsaid As semblies, Generall and ProvinciaU, Presbitries and Sessions, juris diction and discipline thereof, mentioned in the said Act, to be in aU tyme coming most just, good and godhe in the selff, notwith standing of whatsoever Acts, canon, civill, or municipaU lawes maid in the contrair. And thereafter, in the ParUament halden at Edin brough 1593, the 21st of Juhi, in the Act 160, his Majestie agam confirmes and estabhshes both the jurisdiction and the judicatours of the Kirk in the GeneraU and SynodaU AssembUes, Presbitries, and particular Sessions of every kirk and paroche ; willing and ordaining their sentences and decreits, in matters pertaining to their judicatory, to be put in execution, and tak fuU effect, and the contempners therof and obstinate persons to be put to the home. Thus did his Majesty sufficientUe witnes what conscience his Hienes maid of that covenant, whilk he himselff had maid, and had caused aU his subjects make with the Lord, and what reverence he carryed in his heart toward that great and glorious name of the Lord his God, makeing it evident to aU men that his Ma jesty (as the forsaid Mr Patrick Adamson affirmeth) was not culpabUe of these things whilk wer ascryved to his Majesty, bot that the sonnes of Servia were too strong for him tUl God did remove them. CAP. IV. THE SECOND BREAK AND BEGINNING OF THE PRESENT DECAY OF THE LIBERTIE, JURISDICTION AND DISCIPLINE OF THE KIEK OF SCOTLAND. When the work of God did thus greatly prosper and his Kirk- floorishe, the Lord only wyse who knowes that ease slayeth the foolishe, and that long peace, without the crosse, breids coldnes in his worship, and who will have offences and schismes to faU out for trying of such as are approved in his Kirk, did suffer Sathan ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 355 again to employ his craft and mahce against the prosperous estaite of his saints. For about the zeir 1595 ane great emulation and jealousie, being secreitly fostered in the hearts of many, bot speci aUie of those who wer nearest his Majestie's person, against ane Octoverat, or eight Privie CounseUors, then croppen in the fuU credit with his Majestie of all his effaires; and therupon that tumultuous uproare, craftiUie raised the said 1595 zeir in Decem ber 17, occasion was taken heirof be the cheiffest of that Octo verat, who were ever Papists in their hearts, and knowen enemies from ther beginning (as yet stUl they continew) to the trueth of God and his trew servands, to intend the utter overthrow of the gospeU and Ubertie of religion. For effectuating whereof, pur- poshe miskening the trew authors of that trouble, they subtiUie did insinuat and foster in his Majestie's mynd ane eviU conceit and oppinion of the ministers, speciaUie of Edinbrough, as authors of the said commotion, and as seditious and turbulent men, seiking no less then his Majestie's overthrow, as he himselff, at the AssembUe haulden therefter at BruntUand, did utter, saying, That he could not esteem himselff sure of his persone so long as these ministers sould remaine in Edinbrough. And, for remeiding of that eviU, they did still perswade, that ther was no way so sure as to alter the government of the Kirk from that Democratic, (as they called it,) whilk aUwayes behoved to be full of sedition and troubUe to ane Aristocratie, and so in end to a Monarchic, whilk aUwayes was least subject to confusion, broyUes and sedition : the accomplishing wherof they did very forwardlie promise to the King, if his Majestie sould procuire the absolute removeing of those ministers of Edin brough, the faithfuU servands of God, and famous for ther knowen sinceritie, wisdom, learning, godliness and fruitfuU labours in the house of God ; whilk, notwithstanding, at that tyme could not be procured, God so clearing and bringing to Ught their innocencie, that by no craft, colour, nor poUcie of their adversaries, could any guUtines be found in them. Wherfor that purpose not succeiding, they went about another way to finishe ther designes, composeing a buik, be the labour z2 356 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE speciaUie of Mr John Lindsay then Lord Secretarie, called " The (King's) Questions to be proponed be his Majestie to the Generall AssembUe," thinking thereby to bring the wholle dis ciphne in question. For answering whereof his Majestie, by his missive letters, did convocat ane AssembUe at Perth the first of March the zeir 1596. Heir first did his Majestie alter the ordinarie dyet and place of the Assemblie of the Kirk ; for in the Assemblie halden at Edinbrough the 23d of Mairch, in the zeir 1595, the next Assem blie was appoynted to haid in Saint Andrewes the 27th of ApryU 1597. Bot his Majestie, be his missives, both altered the place and preveined the tyme. The Kirk, in respect of the tym and course then in hand, greatly fearing this to tend to sum farder pre judice, albeit, for obedience of his Majestie, they assembUed at Perth, yet hardhe could be brought to condiscend to vioEt ther order in acknowledging or consenting that that meiting should be repute ane Ordinar Assembhe ; so that two days were spent in debaiting that matter, whilk his Majestie instanthe urged, that sic things as should be therein concludit might have the fuU strength of the EcclesiasticaU statutes and lawes of the Kirk. So that the ministrie, — being requyred by Sir John Cokburn of Ormestoun knyght, Lord Justice-Clark, and Mr Edward Bruce, Commendator of Culross, his Majestie's Commissioners, to declair if they wer ane lawfuU GeneraU AssembUe of the Kirk, and had sufficient power be themselffes to give answer, treat and conclude upon sic things as wer to be proponed and intreated in this present Convention, according to his Majestie's warrand and missive letters direct to them be his Hienes to this same effect, — finding themselffes on every syde pressed with difficulties, as being in danger to be de- nunceit to the home, or imprissoned for unlawfuU convention and assemblling of themselffes, if they denyed themselffes ane lawfuU Assembhe ; and, on the uther pairt, if they granted that, they wer to be urged with many things prejudiciaU to the Ubertie of the Kirk of God and of the gospell of Christ, wherunto, in respect of the tyme, they behoved either to yield or incur his Majestie's far- ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 357 der displeasour ; at length, efter long deliberation, did return this answer to his Majestie, that their meiting was ane lawfuU Extraor- dinar GeneraU AssembUe, be reason of bis Majestie's letter direct to the Presbitries and ProvinciaUs to that effect, and the Presbi tries and ProvinciaUs commissions given to them to meitt in the town of Perth ; and, therfor, wer willing to hear what his Majestie sould propone, and to treat, conclude, and give answer theranent, conform to the commissions with the whilk they wer authorized be the Presbitries and SynodaU AssembUes. Heirupon his Majestie, for promoving the cheiff poynt wherat he aymed, did delay the proponing of aU his Questions to ane better opportunitie, making choyse of threttein articUes to be resolved at that tyme : the first wherof was, That it sould not be thoght unlawfuU, neither to the Prince nor any of the pastours, at any tyme therefter, to move doubts, reason, or crave reformation in any poynts of the externaU pollicie, and government or disciphne of the Kirk, that are not essentiaU concerning salvation, or is not answered affirmative vel negative be any expresse pairt of the Scripture. Heirby was sought ane hbertie to call the wholl present jurisdiction and ordour of the Kirk in question, that the intendit change might the mor easilUe be effectuat. Yet heirunto did the ministrie accord in matters of externaU government, alterable according to circumstances, pro- vyding that it wer done in the GeneraU Assemblie, in right tym and place animo cedificandi, non tentandi. The 9th article was, That no Meittings nor Conventions sould he among the pastours without his Majestie's knowledge and con sent, excepting aUwayes their ordinarie Sessions, Presbitries and Synods ; whilk lykwayes was aggried to with this addition, That besyde Sessions, Presbitries and Synods, ther meittings in visita tion of kirks, admission and deprivation of ministers, taking up feids, and sic uthers as hes not bein found fault with be his Ma jestie, sould be excepted aUso. In these two things was sought, Both that the meittings of the Kirk, heirtofore frie and authorized be law as ordained of God, sould be maid subject to the Prince's pleasour, and that be tyme the Kirk sould be depry ved of Gene- 358 CERTA1NE RECORDS TOUCHING THE rail AssembUes, whilk in this article wer suppressed, as suppossed to be comprysed under Synods. The 10th article was, That in all the principaU townes ministers sould not be chossen without the consent of their own flock, and of his Majestie, and that ordour to be begun presenthe, in the planting of Edinburgh. The first pairt heirof was yeUdit; the last, touching Edinbrough, was past in sUence unanswered, knowing that this article was purposly sought for procuiring the removing of Mr Robert Bruce, and the rest of the ministers of Edhibrough from that flock, who, for the present, in respect of the violent per- suit made of their lives be the Lords forsaid, were compeUed, be advyse of their flock, to withdraw themselffes from the present furie, and to lye in secreit tiU that storme sould cease ; who, for this cause, wer denunced to the home, aUbeit they aUways offered themselffes to ane unsuspect tryaU of the lawes, anent the uproar raised the 17th of December ; upon the whilk occasion the saids Lords, and for the same purpose, had allso caused his Majestie tak the Town of Edinbrough bound and obleidged, befor he sould re- save them into his favour, tojresaive nor make choyse of no minister bot sik as his Majestie sould appoynt them. The 12th article was, That seven or eight of discreit, wyse minisr ters sould be authorized with commission to reason upon the rest of the Questions as opportunitie of tyme sould serve : for the whUk ther were fourtein appoynted be the Assembhe, ordain ing them to report their oppinion and advyse touching the said Questions to the nixt GeneraU AssembUe. Thus did his Majestie lay the foundation of EpiscopaU government, by making pre paration thereto by the like number of Commissioners as their fore-runners. At this Assemblie his Majestie, intending farder to bring the haill outward ordour and government to depend upon his pleasour, befor the conclusion of these articles, did send to the Assembhe, wUling them to repair to the place wher his Hienes, with the Estaits, were presenthe sittand, there to confer anent the foresaid articUes. They, for obedience to his Majestie, resorted to the ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 359 CounseU, and, befor any reasoning, made Protestation as foUowes : — " Sir, ForsameikUe as we are cum hither to testifie unto your Majestie our obedience, and to hear what saU be proponed to us be your Hienes, in aU reverence we protest, that this our meitting be not esteimed as though we maid ourselves ane AssembUe with the Estaites, or yit does submitt any matter ecclesiasticaU, either con cerning Doctrine or DiscipUne, to this judicatour ; * but efter we have conferred and reasoned with your Majestie anent the articUes proponed to us, we must returne to the ordinary place of our As semblie, ther to reason, voit and resolve m aU these poynts accord ing to the Word of God and good conscience. And this our pro testation we maist humblhe desyr may be admitted and insyrt in your Majestie's Buikes of CounseU, for eschewing inconvenients that heirefter may aryse." This protestation was ratified, regis trat, and confirmed be his Majestie, and farther, is registered in the Bookes of the Assemblie. Heir again, at his Majestie's desyr, the Assembly ordinar is appoynted to hauld at Dundee, the tenth day of Maii 1597 ; and so both tyme and place changed at his Majestie's pleasour. CAP. V. THE INDEAVOUR OF THE KIRK TO PRESERVE THE DISCIPLINE FROM THE CREIPING IN [OF] CORRUPTIONS, AND CONTRAIR DRESSINGS OF THE ADVERSARIES. At this great alteration the Kirk, justhe fearing that whilk more and more daylie did cum on, did use aU lawfuU meanes to preserve their estaite in als great integritie as could be. Therfor Mr Robert Pont, Moderatour of the AssembUe haulden at Edin- broughe the 23d of Mairch 1595, for maintenance of the Kirk's libertie, did pass to Saint Andrews, aecompanyed with Mr John HaU, (now one of the greattest enemies to the libertie of Christ his kingdome,) and upon the 5th day of ApryU'1597, appoynted * " This present Convention." Gibson's MS. 360 CERTATNE RECORDS TOUCHING THE in the forsaid AssembUe at Edinbroughe for the nixt, did fence the Assemblie, and ordourlie continued it to the tenth of Maii at Dundie, according to the appoyntment of the extraordinary As sembUe at Perth, at his Majesty's desyre. So cairfuU were these same men in these dayes to defend the Kirk of God in aU her pri- viledges, who now in thir tymes are becom the cheiff impugners of that Christian libertie ; which more appeared at the nixt Assem blie at Dundee, the tenth of Maii 1597, wher the Assembhe at Perth being called in question, and desyred be bis Majestie to be ratified, with great difficultie they wer moved to acknowledge the lawfullnes of it, yet so as they would have certaine of the Acts maid therat explained and somwhat corrected ; as, namhe, [" con cerning] the articUe anent convention of pastours, his Majestie's consent was declaired to be extendit to all, and whatsoever forme, either of GeneraU AssembUe or SpeciaU AssembUe, permitted and authorized be his Hienes's lawes, according as they have warrand in the Word of God, as being the most authentick forme of consent that any King can give." Lykwayes, [" as to] the articUe anent provision of pastours to Borrowes, it was declaired, That the rea son therof was and is, that his Majestie was content, and promissed, that wher the GeneraU Assembhe finds it necessar to place any persone or persons in any of the saids townes, his Majestie and the flock sail either give their consent therto, or els ane sufficient reason of their refuisall, to be proponed either to the whoU As sembhe, or to a competent number of the Commissioners thereof, as his Majestie saU think expedient." ' At this Assemblie, be advyse of certaine of the ministers them selffes, who, at Perth, fearing to have lost their credit in Court by < their forwardnes in pleading for the Kirk's libertie, pairtUe moved -by threattenings, pairtlie for gaine, and pairtUe to maintaine their courtlie credit, had secreithe weddit themselffes to his Majestie's-1 appetyt, in proeuiring the overthrow of the discipline of the Kirk, and re-esstabhshing again that abjured Hierarchie ; of whom the most special! and principaU was Mr James NicoUson, to that day in great accompt among his brethrein. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 361 His Majestie, upon the pretence and schow of the multitude of matters of great weight and importance, not only touching parti cular flocks, bot whilk did conceme the whoU estaite and bodie of the Kirk, whUk commodioushe could not be intreated nor con- cludit through schortnes of tym in that present Assembly, desyred the brethrein to consider, whither it were expedient that ane Ge neraU Commission- sould be granted to certaine of the most wyse and discreit of the brethrein, to convein with his Majestie, for effec tuating of the saids weightie effaires. Wherupon commission was given again to fourtein, or any seven of them, to convein with his Majestie, to take order for the providing of ministers to the toun of Edinbrough, Dundie, and Saint Andrewes, his Majestie's and the Prince's House, and generaUie to give their advyse to his Majestie in aU effaires concerning the weiU of the Kirk, and inter- tainment of peace and obedience to his Majestie within the realme; with power to them to propone to his Majestie the petitions and greives, als weiU of the Kirk in generaU, as of every member ther of in particular, as sould be brought unto them. Thus did the misterie of iniquite work and tak farder growth daylie by poUicie, thus reduceing the effaires of the Kirk to the government of a few, whilk sould be joyned to his Majestie as his Ecclesiastick CounseU, that, be his Hienes direction, the wholle government of God's house sould be ordered and led, that so, through length of tym, from him, as the cheif mover, aU sould pro- ceid, both in Kirk and Commonwealth. Shortlie heirefter, it appeared to what purpose this commission was sought ; for, at their pleassour, the ministers of St Andrewes, Mr David Blake and Mr Robert WaUace, men of rair and exceUent gifts and sinceritie, wer removed from St Andrews, and Mr George Glaidstanes, ane of the Commissioners, a young man, far inferiour everie way to the for mer, was placed in their rowmes ; and one Mr John Rutherfoord, who, for many just and weightie. causes was depryved of his minis- trie be the Presbitrie of Saint Andrewes, as a most pernicious instrument in procuring dissention betwixt his Majestie and the ministrie, was, notwithstanding against reason, sett to his ministrie 362 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE be these Commissioners. Bot most of aU did they bewray their intention at the succeiding ParUament halden at Edinbrough, the 19th of December 1597, where they procured ane act to be maid, that sic pastours and ministers as at any tym his Majestie sould pleas to provyde to the office, place, title and dignitie of ane Bishop, Abbot or uther Prelat, sould at aU tym therefter have voit in Parliament, sicklyk, and als frielie as any uther ecclesiasticaU Prelate had at any tym bygone, as they who ever hes represented ane of the Estaites of this realme in aU Conventions of the saids Estaites ; in the whUk Act it is aUso ordained, that whatsoever Bishopricks presenthe vakand in his Hienes hands, or whUks saU happen at any tym heirefter to be vaUiand, saU be only disponed be his Majestie to actuaU ministers and preachers in the Kirk, or to sic uther persons as saU be found apt and quahfied to use and exerceise the office and function of ane minister and preacher, who, in their provisions to the saids. Bishopricks, sould accept in and upon them to be actuaU pastours and ministers, and according thereto, sould practeise and exerce the same therefter. Howsoever the Estaits of this land, moved be his Majestie's fordward deaUing, and the Commissioners of the Kirks sent, did yeild to this Act, yet so greathe did they respect the glory of God in maintenance of their sinceritie, als weUl of the only trew disci pline and spirituaU government of his House as of the trueth of doctrine ; that, fearing least this beginning sould tend to the over throw of the present order estabUshed in the Kirk, whilk they had sworn to defend, they refussed to conclude any thing concerning the office of the saids persons to be provydit to the saids Bishop ricks in their spirituaU poUicie and government in the Kirk, and whoUie remitted the same unto the King's Majestie, to be advysed, consulted and agried upon be his Hienes, with the GeneraU As semblie of the ministers, at sic tymes as his Majestie sould think expedient to treat with them thereupon ; zet so as they made this speciaU caution, that it sould be but * prejudice of the jurisdiction and discipline of the Kirk established be Acts of Parliament * Without. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 363 maid at any tym preceiding, and permitted be the saids Acts to all GeneraU and ProvinciaU AssembUes, and uthers whatsum- ever, Presbitries and Sessions of the Kirk. Thus, in his mercy, did God steir up the hearts of the professours to stand to the maintenance of that discipline, whilk by the preachours was sought to be overthrowen. CAP. VI. THE POLLICIE USED TO INDUCE THE KIRK TO ALLOW DIVERS THINGS TENDLNG TO THE STRENGTHENING OF THE FORMER COURSE AGAINST THE DISCIPLINE. His Majestie, persaiving that ther was no hope to prevaiU in Par liament before the GeneraU AssembUe sould first consent to his purpose, from that tyme whoUie keeped himselff to draw the most pairt of the ministrie, speciaUie sic as wer Commissioners, to his mynd, and to have sic only, or for the most pairt, in commission, as did inclyne his way. Therfor did his Majestie, from that tyme, stUl keep the Generall AssembUe his selfe, and endeavoured not only to have the diets therof to depend upon his direction, bot aUso to have aU things governed in them according to his pleasour ; therfor did he alter the dyets appoynted by the Generall Assem bhe at his pleasour, that by consuetud, he might attaine to that, wherunto be law nor reason he could not : and whatsoever had beine done to the grieff of good men and harm of the Kirk, be the Commissioners, for fear to offend his Majestie, (who stUl did plead their cause,) behoved in the AssembUe to be approved. Thus, by his presence, the Commissioners wer stUl maintained in their course against the Ubertie and freedome of the Kirk, the rest being restrained be his Majestie's authoritie and reverence borne to his Hienes, oftymes from censuring those things wherewith they had more then just cause to be greived. This was evident in the nixt Assemblie, whilk being appoynted to haid at Stirling, the first Twysday of Maii, was altered, and, 364 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE at his Majestie's command, brought to Dundie the 7th of Mairch 1597 ; in the whUk, whatsoever was done to the hurt of the Kirk and prejudice of the gospeU, and most exceUent pastours therofin Edinbrough and St Andrewes, or yet in favours of the worst sort, as Mr John Rutherfoord, was aUowed ; only the suspension of Mr Robert Wallace from the ministrie was annuU'd ; yet so as he be hoved not to returne to his place in Saint Andrewes, bot to serve in sic uther place wher the Eirk sould think his travaUls to be best imployed. And aUbeit many just greives wer given in be many brethrein against their proceidings, yet wer aU ordained to be buried and put in obhvion, upon pretence of continuing peace and quyetnes in the Kirk ; the trew cause being the satisfaction of his Majestie's wiU and desyre. In this AssembUe also, the Commis sioners obtained, upon the occasion forsaid, ane approbation of their intention in craiving voit in Parhament for the ministers. His Majestie, not fully satisfied heirwith, did desyr the Assem blie to enter mto particular consideration of that matter anent the Act of Parhament preceiding, touching votting in Parliament, and to conclude every poynt therof, in respect the form, maner and haUl circumstances of the persons that sould have voit, wer reserved be the Estaits to the Assembhe to be accepted or re fused as they sould think expedient. So at that tyme thrie things were concluded anent the Kirk's voiting in Parhament as the Third Estait of the land, and that with great contradiction and miscontentment of aU the best sort, aU things being carryed away be plurahtie of a few voits, the number being more regairded then the weight and valour. First, it was thoght necessar and expedient for the weiU of the Kirk, that the ministers, as the Thrid Estait of the kingdome, in name of the Kirk, sould have voit in Parhament. 2. Concerning the number of ministers that sould have voit, it was concludit and~ thoght expedient that ffyftie and ane, or therby, sould be chosen to that effect, according to the number of Bischops, Abbots and Pryours, that in tyme of the PapisticaU Kirk had voit in Parlia ment. 3. It was concludit, that the election of them who should ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 365 have voit in ParUament ought to be of a mixt qualUtie, and so pairtUe to appertaine to his Majestie, and pairtUe to the Kirk. The remanent heads of that question concerning their office : who sould voit in ParUament, videlicet, of the maner of his election, of his rent, of the continuance of his office, whither he sould be chossen ad posnam or noght, of his name, of the cautions for preservation of him from corruptions, and aU uther circumstances, wer referred to farder advysement of every Presbitrie in particu lar ; and, therefter, the Synods were ordained to conveine the first Twysday of Junii, to reason and consult upon the saids heads, and to choyse out thrie of the wysest out of every Synod, to be in readines upon his Majestie's advertisment, to convein with his Majestie, together with the Doctors foUowing : — Mr Andrew MelvUl, Mr John Johnstoun, Mr Robert RoUock, Mr Patrick Sharp, Mr Robert Howie, Mr Robert WUkie, and Mr James Mairtein, at sic day and place as his Majestie saU think expedient, with power to them to reason and confer ; and, in caise of uniform agriement of oppinions, to conclude the haiU questions touching voit in Parhament : Utherwayes, in caice any discrepancie or variance sould be, the conclusion to be referred to the nixt Gene raU AssembUe. Thus did that' work reseive no smaU progresse ; and for the farder promoving of it, his Majestie, under pretence of the Con stant Platt, planting of kirks, waitting on Parhament, presenting of greives, did obtain again that ane commission sould be given to nyntein, or any nyne of them, to conveine with his Majestie, and to concur with him in aU the forsaid things ; as aUso to have power to give their advyse to his Majestie, for preventing aU in- convenients lyk to faU out in prejudice of the Kirk, and to sitt and cognosce upon every fact of the ministrie, wherof his Majestie, finding himself grieved, sould crave redress, and be themselffes to try and conclude therin, haveing first, for information, craved the advyse of the most discreit of the Presbitrie wher the person offendar dweUeth. This commission being once concludit, dyvers of the ministers 366 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE being greatlie offendit therwith, as bemg the very foundation of ane oppen tyrrannie ; it was again somwhat restrained in the last poynt be his Majestie's consent, that the Commissioners sould not be employed in any sic matter, except it wer first notorioushe knowen that the Presbitrie wher the offendar had his residence, understanding the fact, did either neglect the tryaU therof, or then not satisfie his Majestie with imposition of condigne punish ment. AU things being thus governed, a learned and reverend father, Mr John Davidson, did give in ane protestation in his own name, and in the name of divers uthers, unsuspected brethrein, protesting that that AssembUe was not ane frie AssembUe, and therfor that nothing therin concludit to the prejudice of the Kirk sould have any force or strength. This protestation he desyred to be insert in the Buikes of the Assembhe ; whilk being resisted be bis Majestie, the Assembhe, for fear to offend his Hienes, did discharg the Clark to insert the same in the Buikes of the Assemblie. The nixt Assembhe being appoynted to hauld at Aberdein the first Twysday of Juhi 1600, was, be his Majestie, altered from Aberdein to Montrose, and from the first Twysday of Juhi to the eightein of March, wher the advyse and proceedings of the Com missioners from Synods conveined, according to the ordinance of the preceiding AssembUe, with his Majestie at Falkland, the 25th of Juhi 1598, to resolve upon the remanent heads, touching voit in Parliament, being produced and considered so farr as they had resolved, was aUowed. First, Concerning the maner of his election who sould have voit in Parliament, it was ordained, That he sould first be recomendit be the Kirk unto the King in forme as foUowes : that is, the General Assemblie haveing reseived the advyse of the Synods and Presby tries, wher the person is to be placed, be wrytt nominating sex aither within or without the bounds of ther Synods, the Generall Assembhe saU present them to his Majestie, who bound and obleidged himselff to mak choyse of none uther bot one of the sex presentit to him, as said is : And in caice, upon just reason of their ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 367 insufficiency, and greater sufficiency of uthers, his Majestie sould refuse them aU, then the Kirk was to mak a new nomination, accord ing to the number foresaid, out of the whilk, without farder refusaU, his Majestie sould be obleidged to make choyse of one whom the Synod sould admitt ; with this caution, that if ther wer ane within the bounds of the Synod als meit as these who sould be named without, he sould be preferred. Second, Anent his rent, it was concludit he sould be provydit be his Majestie to the superplus of the benefice wherto he sould be preferred, the haiU Kirks within the same being first sufficient- lie planted, and the schooles and coUedges aUreadie erected not prejudged of their rents and donations. Third, Concerning his name, it was concludit, be uniform consent of aU the brethren, that he sould not be caUed Bishope, etc., bot the Commissioner of sic a place for the Kirk, according to the Synod or Presbitrie, or pairt of the land wher he sould be admitt ed ; with this condition, that if the Parliament could not be induced to acknowledge that name, the GeneraU Assemblie therefter sould conclude that question. Fourth, Touching the Cautions to keep him from corruption, there were nyne maid at Falkland, to wit : — " 1. That he presume not at any tyme in Parhament, Counsell or Convention, to propone, in name of the Kirk, any thing with out ane expresse warrand and direction from the Kirk, and sic things as he saU answer for, to be for the weUl of the Kirk, under pain of deposition from his office ; and that he neither keep sUence in any thing, nor consent to any thing in the saids Conventions, that may be prejudiciaU to the weUl of the Kirk and Ubertie therof, under the same pain. " 2. That he saU be content with that pairt of the benefice whilk ¦ saU be given him be bis Majestie for his Uving, not hurting nor prejudging the rest of the ministers of the Kirks within his bene fice, planted or to be planted, or any uther minister of the countrey whatsoever : And this clause to be insert in his provision. " 3. He sail not deEpidat in any way his benefice, neither mak 368 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE sett nor disposition therof, without the speciaU advyse and consent of his Majestie and Generall Assemblie ; and, to that effect, .sould interdyte himselff to the GeneraU AssembUe, neither himselff to dUapidat nor consent to the dUapidation therof maid be others ; and sould consent that inhibitions be raised on him to that effect. " 4. He sould be bound faithfuUie to attend upon his owne par ticular congregation, wherat he saU be minister in aU the poynts of ane pastour, and heiranent saU be subject to the tryaU and cen sure of his own Presbytrie and ProvinciaU AssembUe, as any uther minister that bears not commission. " 5. That in administration of discipline, coUation of benefices, visitations, and uther poynts of ecclesiastick government, he saU neither usurp nor acclaim to himselff any power of jurisdiction, farder nor any uther of the rest of bis brethrein, except he be im ployed be his brethren, under the pain of deprivation; and in caise he usurp any pairt of the ecclesiasticaU government, the Presbitrie, SynodaU or GeneraU Assemblie opponing and making impediment therto, whatsoever he does efter the said impediment to be nuU, ipso facto, without any declaratour. " 6. In Presbitries, ProvinciaU and GeneraU Assembhes, he saU behaiff himselff in aU things, and be subject to their censure, as any other brother of the Presbitrie. " 7. At his admission to his office of Commissionarie, thir and aU uther poynts necessar, he saU swear and subscryve to fuUfiU, under the penalties forsaids ; utherwayes not to be admitted. " 8. He saU be bound at everie GeneraU AssembUe to give ane accompt anent the discharge of his commission since the Assem bhe preceiding ; and saU submitt himselff to their censure, and stand at their determination whatsoever, without appeUation ; and saU seik and obtaine ratification of his doings at the said Assem bhe, under the paine of infamie and excommunication. *¦ "9. In caice he beis depryved be the GeneraU Assemblie, Synod, or Presbitrie, from his office of the ministrie, he saU aUso tyne his voit in Parliament ipso facto, and his benefice saU vaik." Thir Cautions wer concludit be the Commissioners at Falkland, ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 369 reserving libertie to the Kirk to add farder as they should think meitt and have occasion. Unto the whilk, the AssembUe added these two foUowing : — " 1. That none of them that sail have voit in Parhament sail cum as Commissioners to any GeneraU AssembUe, nor have voit in the same, in any tym coming, except he be authorized with ane commission from his own Presbitrie to that effect. " 2. That crimen ambitus saU be ane sufficient cause of depriva tion of him that saU have voit in Parhament." The question touching the continuance of his office and com mission, Whither it sould be for his lyfe, (except a cryme inter- veined,) or for a shorter tyme ? being left be the Commissioners at Falkland, in respect of the difference of their oppinions, to this AssembUe, it was concludit, " That he sould continue bot for ane yeir, and so sould give compt of his commission resaived from the Assemblie everie yeir, and lay doun his commission at the feit of the said Assemblie, to be altered or continued be his Majestie and the Assemblie, as the Assemblie, with consent of his Majestie, sould think most expedient for the weUl ^of the Kirk." Howsoever these things wer thus concludit, with als great circumspectnes as could be, for avoyding the danger whUk was universaUie feared, yet no regaird was had in keiping them be sic as efterward were promoved be his Majestie ; so that it was layed to the chairge of Mr John Spottiswood appoynted Bischop of Glasgow, therefter in anno 1605, befor his Majestie, be the Lord Balmerinoch, President, that he had sworne to observe the Caveats, and had obleidged him selff to subscry ve them. Neither could his Majestie be weiU satis fied with him in that matter, untiU he did procuir ane act of the Presbitrie of Glasgow, testifieing, that he had not subscryved them ; whilk he presented to his Majestie for his defence, as thoght his -oath had bein nothing as long as he did not subscryve. In this AssembUe was renewed again ane commission to so many, or ony nyne of them, to conveen with his Majestie, for the causses specified in their comission in the preceiding Assemblie, with abso- i lute power therin, and speciaUie in trying and cognoshing offences 2 a 370 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE done be any of the ministrie against his Majestie, and punishing of them as they sould think most expedient for the glory of God and weUl of the Kirk. The nixt Assemblie being appoynted to hauld at Saint An drewes that last Twysday of Juhj 1601, both tyme and place were efterward altered be his Majestie, and the Assemblie brought to BruntUland, the 12th of Maij 1601 ; wher the ministrie have- ing perceaved the great decay that, by the former proceidings of the Kirk, had cum to religion in aU estaites, and that ther was no appearance, without speedie repentance and prevention, bot that, within ane short space, aU sould end in ane oppen de fection to Papistrie or Atheisme, they laboured both to consider the causses and remedies of sic inconvenients ; whilk being pro poned, wer aU outwardhe heard, and resaved and approved be his Majestie ; bot the remedies whilk wer most necessar left un practised to this day. And allbeit ane of the greatest and chieffest causses of the saids inconvenients was the proceiding of the Com missioners of the GeneraU AssembUe, yet was ane commission at his Majestie's desir againe renewed to them, with full power, in aU ' the preceiding effaires committed to them befor ; be quhais advyse and assistance, as in tymes past, so now again his Majestie altered both tym and place of the nixt Generall AssembUe ; it being ordain ed to hauld at St Andrewes the last Twysday of Juhj 1602, [but] it was brought by his Majestie to Holyrudhouse, the tenth of November, the yeir 1602. At the whilk the inconvenients and dangers aUreadie fallen out, and farder lyke to ensew, being more deiply apprehendit be the ministers, they were compeUed in con- , science- to insist more earnestUe for remeid therof. And to this effect the Grieffes foUowing were given in be the Synod of Fyffe/ and craved to be considered and redressed : — " 1. Anent the disorder in keiping the GeneraU Assembhes, Thaji they were not ordinarily keiped, notwithstanding of the Acts of Parhament, Acts of the GeneraU AssembUe, and necessitie of the tyme ; bot the dyets therof wer altered, without the knowledge of Presbyteries and Synods. 2. That Ministers were caUed befor his ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 371 Hienes Secret CounseU, in prima instantia, for doctrine and dis cipline, to the great encouragement of the enemies. 3. That the government of the chieff matters of the Kirk was continued in the hands of a few under the name of a Commission, to the great pre judice of the Uberties of Synods and Presbyteries. 4. That the Doctours bearing ordinar calling in the Kirk, be the discipUne and custome thereof, were debarred from the AssembUe. 5. That the AssembUe had taken no tryall anent the Cautions sett down for avoyding corruption in the Commissioners votters in the ParUa ment." These Greiffes, besyds divers uthers, being considered, the sub- ! sequent Remedies were enacted, with his Majestie's consent : — Con cerning the first, it was found, That the GeneraU AssembUe sould be appoynted and keiped according to the Act of Parhament halden at Edinbrough the 4th of Junij 1592 ; the tenour wherof was insert 'in the ordinance of the Assembhe, ordaining the Gene raU Assemblie to be halden everie yeir or ofter, as occasion sould requyre, and the tym and place to be appoynted for the nixt Gene- ' raU Assemblie in the present Assemblie, be his Majestie or his Com missioner, being present with the Assemblie, utherwayes be the AssembUe themselffes, according as it had bein in use and custom to doe in tymes past ; and so all power taken from the Commission ers in tyme to cum, to alter or delay the dyets of the said Assem blie. Touching the second, it was agreed, That his Majestie sould proceid against ministers, according to his Majestie's own Declara tion, inacted in the GeneraU AssembUe at Dundie 1597, wherin it was agreed that his Majestic sould craive redresse befor the Pres bitries and Commissioners of the Kirk, in whatsoever he sould be offendit. As for uthers who did sumond the ministers to appear befor the CounseU for exerceiss and execution of discipline, it was ,- promissed be his Majestie in the AssembUe at Montrose, the 18th of Mairch 1600, sessione tertia, according as it is there registrat, That no letters sould be direct from the Secret CounseU at the in stance of any persone, against any minister in particular, or any Presbitrie in generaU, for whatsoever thing he or they sould doe 2 a2 372 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE in the execution of his or their offices, before the person requyring the saids letters sould produce ane testimoniaU under form of in strument de denegata justitia, of the minister or Presbitrie judges ordinar. For remedie of the thrid, it was ordained, That aU Com missions suld be given and used, from that tym foorth, according to the Acts of the GeneraU Assemblie. Anent the fourth, it was found, That Doctours had and might have voit in GeneraU Assem blies, being authorized with Commission, according as was declair ed and inacted in the Generall AssembUe at Edinburgh, the 10th of Maij, sessione sexta, 1586, and at [Glasgow, April] 1581, wherin it was decerned, that Doctours sould concurr with the remanent elders, ther brethrein, in all Assemblies. The fyfth greiff, touching the tryaU of the observation of the Caveats and Cawtions, was slenderlie ansuered ; becaus it behoved to be so, and no more [was] ordained, bot that the Caveats sould be looked to, and preceisely keiped in tym coming, under the paines contained in the Acts maid thereanent. And so aU bygone enormities and insolencies in the persons of the saids Commissioners past bot ony cen sure or correction. Yet the smaU beginning that was at that tyme, and indeavour to have things redressed, and the Kirk again restored to her wonted libertie, was ane of the causses whilk mov ed both his Majestie and the Commissioners of the Kirk to labour together to stay aU GeneraU AssembUes in tym coming, for fear lest the said reformation intendit, being prosecut, sould. utterly imped their purposes, not only begun, but now greatly promoved ; as aUso, lest the saids Commissioners, being caUed to their ac- compt, sould suffer the just deserved punishment of -their iniquitie against God and his Kirk ; whilk now had growen to a great height, to the unspeakable grieff and dolour of the best sort, and fearfuU decay of the glory and beawtie of Christ his kingdome, and libertie of the GospeU. , Bot so farr did his Majestie's authoritie (notwithstanding of the saids inconvenients) prevaill, that at the said AssembUe, ane com mission in most ample maner was renewed again to so many, or any nyne of them ; who, for the most pairt, wer aU chossen be his ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 373 Majestie's advyse, of these same men who had bein and stUl con tinued to be the cheiff instruments of the overthrow of the libertie of the Kirk, for their own ambitious desyre of preferrment and gam. At the desyre aUso of his Majestie, the nixt Assemblie was appoynted to be halden at Aberdein, the last Twysday of Jullij 1604. Here first the AssembUe, without dew regaird of the pre judice that theron would foUow to the libertie of the Kirk, did con sent to his Majestie, (so much did they respect his pleasour, con trair to the Act of ParUament and Act of the Assemblie then presently maid, for haulding of AssembUes every yeir once at least, ane continuaU practeiss constantlie observed in tymes past,) that the nixt Assemblie sould not be tUl the last Twysday of JuUij, in the yeir 1604, at Aberdeen. CAP. VII. THE CAUSES MOVING HIS MAJESTIE, AFTER HIS GOING TO ING LAND, TO CONTINUE IN HIS FORMER PURPOSE AND PROJECTS TO ACCOMPLISH HIS DESIRE. Heirafter feU out that great work of God's singular mercie and kyndnes towards his Kirk, ever with thankftdlnes to be remembred, of the peaceable possessing of his Hienes with the impyre and dominion of the whoU Eland, whilk did procuir his Majestie's goeiiig to England : at whose departure from Scotland, (the cheiff- est ground being removed, in the peaceable calling of his Majestie to the Crown of Ingland, whUk was thought to be the principaU motive that did hold his Majestie forward in the former course for procuiring Uniformitie betwixt the two Kingdomes, and, by uniformitie, ane more easie entrie to the possession of the other,) the Kirk in Scotland was left in great hope and expectation of ane peaceable enjoying of her libertie by his Majestie's promeiss and protection, and of the ceaseing of aU practisses against the same by his Majesty's procuirment. Yet his Majestie, coming to England, did find a strong faction of 374 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE the Bischops and their adherents for maintenance, not only of their antichristian Hierarchie, bot of the vylest ceremonies, whereby the sincere worship of God by humane invention was filthihe poUuted, and for refuissing therof the most learned, rehgious and hoUie pas tours to be violenthe put from their caUings, and by them made odious to the licentious, and maliciousUe notted with the name of Puritanes by these who indeid are enemies themselffes of aU Christian pureness, and do hold the Kirk of God, (whilk, by his blood he hes redeemed from bondage of aU ceremonies,) under a most vylle servitude, endeavouring heirby, according to the con clusion of the Apostle, (Gal. v.,) " to obhge themselves to the fuU- fiUing of the whoU law, and so to mak Christ to proffeit them no thing." His Majesty finding this kingdom in this disposition, althogh it yet remained in that staite of outward worship, wherin it had beine left by King Hendrie the Eighth, who had not so much abolished Poperie as the Pope, or, rather, had only transferred the PapaU supremacie from the Pope to himselff; and albeit his Majestie did find yet stiff the said supremacie of authority over aU persones in aU causses, maintained in the person of their Princes, and the worship of God howsoever purged from that grosse idol- latrie of the breaden God and expiatorie sacrifice, yet stUl attyred in the hvray of the robber, and busket and adorned, or rather, de formed" with the adulterous and whoorish ornaments, form, fashion, shaip and covering resaved from that Mother of fornications, the wyne of the wraith of whais whoorish fornications aU nations had drunken ; and this Kirk might justhe, with Tamar, by the vaiU of her face, be judged a whoore ; — yet not the less esteeming it danger ous in his beginning to entend great novations, aUbeit both the , earnest longings of the saints therfor expressed, and his own honor, did lead him to reformation, he was forced by the said faction to imbrace another course for his own peace, greathe fordered therto'- by those of Scotland that had so farr imbarked themselffes in that wickednes ; so that not only was he maid to favour the Estaite of Bischops, bot, against his resolution uttered at his first coming ther, to tak be the hand that pest both of Kirk and Commonwealth, ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 375 Bishop Bancroft, his own particular enemie, and in his heart a knowen enemie to the trueth, notwithstanding he had befor oppen- he spoken and wrytten against his Majestie's undouted right to the Crown of Ingland ; who shortlie efter, by flatterie and bribes, did get himselff maid Primat of England, to the great greiff of all guid men and unspeakable hurt of the Kirk. The course so going in England, it did encourage the saids per sons in Scotland to prosecute ther intentions, being so favoured be his Majesty. So farr was his Hienes sett to promo ve the Union of the two Kingdomes, that becaus he was maid to judge it difficUle to reduce England to a conformitie in religion to Scot land, he inclyned to suffer Scotland to be brought to ane unifor mitie, at least in government, with England. And for the accom plishment heirof, the first cair was, to have such in commission from ParUament, as, in treatting about the Union, sould aggrie to that poynt ; the nixt was, to stay the GeneraU Assemblie tiU that change sould be concluded in ParUament, and so the saids As sembhes utterlie abrogate : the first being stayed at the Parlia ment haulden at Edinbrough, the [3d] of Maij 1604, be the op position of the nobiUitie maid to the Lords of the Articlles, who for the maist pairt were purposhe chossen out of these new favou rites ; the noblemen of ancient blood esteiming the matter to ap- pertaine more to them than these men, who had no farder respect to the weUl of the kingdome then sic as might stand with ther privat advancement, and promoving ther credit for estabhshing ther present authoritie, the Bishops aUso being now knowen to have joyned with them to the overthrow both of the Estaite of Kirk and PoUicie. Wherof advertisment being maid to his Majestie be post, for avoyding of farder troubUe, his Hienes did continue the Parhament tUl the [11th] of Julij therefter; at what tym his Majestie did send ane roU of sic persons as he spe ciaUie requyred to be appoynted Commissioners, the greattest number being of the forsaids persons ; uthers being aither sic as were knowen Papists, or adjudged sic as wer whollie governed be them ; [and there] were joyned with them a few that had some 376 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE regaird to the libertie of Kirk and Kingdome. Heir was ther no way left toihe ancient blood of the kingdome to eschew either his Majestie's offence or the endangering of the Kirk and kingdome, but one, quhilk was the resisting of the taxation sought for bear ing chairges of sic as sould be sent, offering to releiff the countrey of that burdein, if they were permitted to send, in that earrand, sic persones as they sould nominat. The forsaids CounseUors and Bischops seeing such difficultie, that either they must depairt from their purpose, or goe without furniture, they did aU agrie to bear their own chairges, far by the expectation of aU men, if they had not looked for recompence. Heirupon the ParUament, seeing no uther remedie, for prevent ing the best they could the utter overthrow both of Rehgion and PoUicie, did in their commission make speciaU exception of rehgion, government, discipline and jurisdiction of the Kirk, and aU lawes maid in favours therof, according as it was presenthe established and practeised within the kingdome : that the Commissioners sould no wayes meU * therwith, to mak any change or alteration therof. Secondlie, In matters concerning the Commonwealth and PoUicie, they did give no power to conclude any thing, bot only to confer and advyse, reserving the conclusion of aU things to the Estaits conveined again in Parhament. The uther poynt touch ing the Assemblie, the Bischops and Commissioners, with his Majestie's Comissionar appoynted not long befor, the Laird of Lawrestoun, did labour to effectuat. Therfor they did send tlieir letters from Perth, at the tym of the said Parhament, to aU Presbitries, for staying the Assembhe at Aberdeen untUl the first Twysday of Julij, quhilk was the second day therof in the yeir 1605, or sooner, if advertisment sould be maid. The tennour of the letter followes : — " Ryght Honourable Brethrein, — Efter our heartiUie com mendations, being conveined heir in Perth, my Lord ControUer cam befor us, declairing among uther articllcs given to his Lordship be * Mell, meddle. estate of the kirk. 377 his Majestie m Commission, wherwith we were acquainted, that it was his Majestie's wUl, that the GeneraU AssembUe of the Kirk, quhilk was appoynted to be haulden.at Aberdeine this month, sould be continued tiU new adverteisment cum from his Majestie, and quhUl this matter of the treating of the Union wer put to som poynt, desyring us to acquamt the haUl Presbitries of Scotland, that they might be mformed not to direct ther Commissioners to Aberdein ; and being advysed whither it was better to mak you adverteis ment be proclamation or be letter, we thought this the best way, to give you adverteisment be our letter, and to acquaint you with his Majestie's wUl, that ye may stay your meitting till the first Twysday of Julij 1605, or soonner if ze be adverteised * : as also to desyre yow, according to our former letter, to send in to Edin broughe, with aU dihgence, betwixt and the first of August nixt, your contribution for the Kirk of Geneva, if as yet ye have not sent it. Ye know Hendrie Nisbet is appoynted to resaive the same, who wiU delyver an acquittance of his resaite, wherwith ze saU content yourselves, as of whom we have taken assurance that he saU returne us the dischairge of the agent of Geneva, presenthe lying at Londoun, togither with ane discharge from the Syndex and Kirk of Geneva. We look for your satissfaction in this mat ter as ye will show your obedience to his Majestie, who hes recom- mendit that Kirk to us. Nocht els, bot commits you to God. From Perth the 4th of Julij 1604. "- Your loving brethrein the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assemblie, and in our names, " Alexander Straitoun, Commissioner. " Mr Patrick Galloway. " Mr Richard Thomson, Clerk to the Commissioners." * In a note added in the Book of the Universal Kirk, it is stated, that the copies of this Letter purposely " differed in the day ; in the missives directed to the North, was appointed the second day of July ; in the missives directed to the South, the fifth day : Therefore some came the second day and some the fifth day." (vol. iii. p. 1013.) The above Letter in Forbes's MSS. by mistake is signed James, instead of Alexander Straiten of Lauriston, who was Commissioner. 378 certaine records touching the The Presbytries, aU except St Andrewes, notwithstanding that tlieir purpose against the discipUne of the Kirk was sufficientlie persaived, and that by these letters they had given evident testi mony of ther insolent usurpation over the house of God, against the Act made in the Assemblie at Holyrudhouse, the [13th] day of [November] 1602, above specified, and that they understood that the conscience of their iniquitie against the Kirk of God, and most zealous and faithfull of the ministrie, did make them to fear ther just deserved punishment, if the AssembUe had haulden ; and aU- beit, the necessitie of the tyme most necessarly requyred the same, for repressing the dangerous schismes arysing be the saids Com missioners procuirment, the growth of impietie and contempt of religion in aU pairts, the dayUe increass of idoUatrie, and apostasie oppenhe avowed, under hope of immunitie from the censure of the Kirk, by their appellation from Presbitries and Synods to the Ge neraU Assemblie, quhilk was never expected to hauld ; yet for aU this, the Presbitries, becaus the said Commissioners did outward ly dissemble their intention, and did father all upon his Majestie, to testifie how farr they were sett to pleasour his Majestie, yeildit to the said continuation, in hope, by information to his Majestie, to obtaine the haisting of the GeneraU AssembUe to a nearer day. cap. vni. OF THE DILIGENCE AND EARNEST ENDEVOURS OF THE MINISTRIE TO PRESERVE AND MAINTAINE THE LIBERTIE OF THEIR ASSEM BLIE AGAINST THE POLLICIE AND CRAFT OF THE BISCHOPS AND COMMISSIONERS. Allbeit diverse meanes were used before to procuir the haisting ' of the Assemblie, both be Synods and Presbitries imploying di verse of the saids Commissioners to that effect, and yet in vaine ; they did make diverse supplications to his Majestie againe, be the same mediatours : bot without all fruit. So that, seven tymes at ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 379 least, first and last, humble suit was made in this matter, first be the Synod of Fyffe, quhilk eamestUe dealt with Mr John Hall, last Moderatour, before Mr Patrick GaUoway then Moderatour, in his absence with his Majestie, to wryte to the King for hasting the GeneraU Assemblie ; who reported again that he had done so, bot could not obtaine it. Secondlie, The Presbitrie of Edinburgh did wrytt to Mr Patrick GaUoway to intreat his Majesty heirin, who, after diverse delaying answers, at last sent word that he sould cum home to keep ane Assembhe ; bot efter his home-cuming no effect foUowed. AU this was befor the forsaid continuation. Wherefore the Presbitrie of St Andrews, considering more deiply the danger of the said delay, did direct in comission to Aberdeine, Mr James MelvUl, Mr WiUiam Murray, and Mr WiUiam Erskine; who coming there, and finding no convention of their brethrein from the Presbitries, for dischairg of their dewtie to God and his Kirk, did make publick Protestation in form and maner as efter follows : — " At Aberdeen, the last day of Julij," &c. [See this Protestation in Calderwood's History, vol. vi., pp. 264-268.] Therfor, heirefter the brethrein in the North finding themselves speciaUie prejudged be the said delay,— the Assemblie being pur- posly appoynted to hauld among them, for repressing the insolence of Papists in the North Countrey, for planting of noblemen's housses and cheiff places with a ministrie meit to doe the work of the Lord, to prosecute the remedies of defection set doun in the Generall AssembUe at BruntiUand, to cause the lait reconceaUed Papists perform the conditions agreid to be them, — they being con veined in ther ProvinciaU Assemblie at Aberdein, and consider ing the continuaU progresse and growth of the forsaid inconve nients, did send certaine Commissioners to the SynodaU Assem blie of Fyffe, be their advyse, to deaU with his Majestie's Commis sioners, for obtaining of ane short dyet to the Generall Assemblie at his Majestie's hands ; as likewise, to procuire a meitting with 380 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assemblie, that by mutuaU conference in love, the present jealousies might be removed, the future dangers prevented, and a perfyte union wrought among the ministers : Who coming to Saint Andrewes and deaUing as said is, the Laird of Lawrestoun, his Majesty's Commis sioner, promeised to convein the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembhe, (albeit, some of themselffes, speciaUie Mr James NiccoUson, being eamestUe requisted heirto be the said breth- reine of the North, did wUlfullie refuise aU meitting with them) ; and, therfor, willed all the provinces to joyn their request, and mak supplication to his Majestie be him and the saids Commis sioners, and it sould be obtained ; and to this effect, appoynted the day of October the same year, at Perth, to conveine befor his going to Court. The quhilk day, Commissioners being conveined from many pro vinces of the kingdom, did most earnestlie desyr a loving confer ence with the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembhe ther con veined with the Laird of Lawrestoun for the causses forsaids ; bot they obstinatlie refuissed to enter in conference with them. Wherupon the said Commissioners from provinces, finding no uther remedie, resolved to wait some better opportunitie of peace now constantlie refuissed be them ; and for the present, leaving uther things, for eshewing of farder distraction, thoght good to make supplication with them, and be them, with the Laird of Lawrestoun, to his Majestie, for obtaining ane GeneraU Assemblie ; quhilk was promeissed be him, and expected bot aU in vaine. Moreover, the Synod of Lowthian, at two severaU tymes, maid humbUe suit for ane Assembhe to his Majesty, bot could prevaUl nothing. And, last of all, what purpose these Commissioners of the Gene ral Assemblie with the Laird of Lawrcston had, notwithstanding of ther former dissimulation, was cleirlie manifested be the Laird of Lawrestoun, eftcv his return from England, in the Synod of Fyffe, haulden at BruntiUand, the [last] day of [April] 1605, where mention being maid of the Generall Assemblie appoynted the ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 381 second of Juhj at Aberdein, and of directing Commissioners ther- to, the Laird of Lawrestoun stronghe withstood it. Wherupon, the AssembUe desyring that the tym and place only might be ap poynted, how long or short soever, that the Kirk might be put out of suspition and jealousie of lossing their Assembhes, and of dis possessing them of so necessar a priviledge, he could be moved for no intreatie to grant it ; so that ther neided no man be ignorant of their purpose and intention to abrogat and utterly abolishe the GeneraU AssembUe of the Kirk, whenas neither could [would] they condiscend that the dyet appoynted sould be keiped, nor yet would designe any uther dyet therefter. At this tyme, besyde these that wer constitute befor, and Mr John Spottiswood, who was maid Bischope of Glasgow, a litle efter his Majestie's going to England, the remanent Bishoprickes were provided and fiUed with Commis sioners. Mr George Glaidstaines was changed from Caitness, to be Archbischop of Saint Andrewes ; Mr Gawin HamUtoun was maid Bischope of Galloway ; Mr James Law of Orkney ; Mr Andrew Knox of the Eles ; Mr Alexander Forbes of Caitness ; Mr Alexander Douglas of Murray ; by whom, and the remanent Commissioners with them, the ministrie of the North, finding themselffes depryved of their expected comfort of the GeneraU AssembUe, and greatlie impedit, partlie by them, and partlie by the CounseU, in ther own lawfull proceidings with the cen sures of the Kirk against the Marques of Huntlie, who had oppenlie avowed a new apostasie and defection from the trueth, and was becum a recusant, not only by certaine of the saids Commissioners familiarly accompanying him, countenanceing him in his wickednes, reasoning in his favour, and pleading for immu- nitie to him ; bot by their poUicie, act, and ordinance, wiUing them to desist from persewing him, and personall chairge of the Coun seU summonding to compeir befor them to hear themselffes or dained to desist, and publictUe dischairged of the CounseU be cop- pies of proclamation at the mercat crose of Aberdeine, inhibiting, under pain of rebeUion, to proceid against him ; quhilk letters pur- chassed be the Laird of Lawrestoun, without any warrand from 382 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE his Majestie, to the great grieff of aU good men, and no small con solation of the wicked, quhais favour these persons did Ebour to conciliat, being assured to find none of the best sort for strengthen ing their course ; — finding themselffs, I say, thus on every syde hardUe straitted, they resolved to send to his Majestie to lament these just greiffes, being assured that these things could not pro- ceid of his Majestie's direction ; and so directed their brother, Mr John Forbes, in commission to pass to his Majestie with expedi- tione ; who, notwithstanding that he was preveined be the Mar ques of Huntlie, (who hearing of his dispatche took post towards his Majestie to preoccupy his mynd,) yet being most gratioushe admitted to his Majestie's presence the third day efter his com ing and favourabUie heard, returned with great comfort to his brethrein ; his Majestie haveing plainhe signified his miscontent- ment with the said proceiding of Lawrestoun, as done without any warrand from his Hienes, and declairing his constant purpose and resolution no wayes to mak any alteration of the discipline and jurisdiction of the Kirk, and ordour of government quhilk he had left established behind him in Scotland ; making his Majestie's mynd knowen to the Kirk be his own letter, of his unfained affec tion to the trueth and constant resolution to doe and direct them,* and giving strait direction to the CounseU, by ane uther letter, to be so farr from resisting the authoritie and jurisdiction of the Kirk, that, be the contrairie, they sould hauld hand thereto, that no dis obedience sould be tollerat, no not in the NobiUitie themselffes, bot that the lawes sould be seveirly execute against them. The hearts of aU were greatUe comforted, and their myndes re freshed, with these glaid and gracious newes, being fuUie assured that these foresaid persones did most unjustlie attribute and ascryve their devyces and doings to his Majestie, who, of himselff, was in- clyned to mak no change, if he had bein freed from their importunat faschious importunitie, by continuaU posting to Court, without any conscience of ther calling, and the fordward deaUing of the Bischops of England in that matter, with whom the Bischops in * Gibson's MS., "to live and die therein," ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 383 Scotland, according to the example of Adamsone, sumtyme Bischop of Saint Andrewes, bussied themselffes more then be came good Christians, let be faithfuU Pastours, against the Uber tie of the Kirk of God in that kingdom and countrey, pairtlie in presence, and pairtUe by inteUigence, mutuaUy intertained in absence. Upon this knowledge of his Majestie's good mynd and intention, the Kirk assuredly hopped to have found no impediment to their nixt Assembhe, the 2d of Julij, at Aberdein; his Majestie haveing given so fuU assurance of his constant resolution no wayes to mak any alteration of their government, and haveing removed aU op- pinion of any intention in his Hienes to stay or imped their ordi nar meittings, desyring nothing more then the peace of the Kirk ; quhairof he desyred the said Mr John Forbes, be ane instrument, by indevouring to procuir aU things to be done in quyetnes and peace : quhilk the said Mr John promeissed to doe according to his power. These were aU the promeisses maid be him, as he reported at his returne, upon his Majestie's own desyre ; quhairin quhat dewtie was broken by his Commissioner's proceidings at Aberdein wUl efterward appear. CAP. IX. THE CONSTANT GOING ON OF COUNSELL AND COMMISSIONERS IN THE INTENDIT PURPOSE. Notwithstanding of the former speciaU declaration of his Majes tie's mynd to the ministrie, and particular direction sent to the CounseU, neither CounseU nor Commissioners rebaited ought in their course. Bot efter the Commissioners, for the more easie ac- comphshing of their purpose, had removed these persons out of the way, whois authoritie and faithfullnes did most hinder their wicked devysses ; as, namelie, that most reverend father Mr Eobert Bruce from Edinbrough, to the unspeakable miscontentment not only of his flock, bot of all good men, (sic was their insolent tyrannie 384 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE over the Kirk of God,) as efterward aUso Mr Robert Howie from Dundie ; they being conveined at Edinbrough the 8th of Junij 1605, resolved again to stay the GeneraU AssembUe; and to this effect sent their letters, subscryved be the Laird of Lawres toun and Mr Patrick GaUoway, to aU Presbitries, in forme as fol- lowes : — " Brethrein, — Our heartiUie salutations premitted, upon his Majestie's warrand direct to us in Julij last, we gave yow adverteis ment of the continuation of the GeneraU Assemblie tUl the fyft of Julij ensewing ; since quhUk time we have humblhe requested his Hienes, at diverse tymes, for holding of the said Assemblie, and haveing resaived answer, under his Majestie's hand, that befor the Parliament the same cannot be permitted: Quhairof we have thoght meitt, be thir presents, to mak yow advertissed, and to desyre yow to stay your Commissioners from keiping the said djret, because it is his Majestie's pleasour; against quhilk, if we sould attempt any thing we might irritat his Majestie, and give occasion to sic ques tions as we would have eschewed, bot we could not profeit our selves any thing. And, therfor, we requeist yow to tak the con tinuation in good pairt, and assure yow we ar and sail be als earnest for ane AssembUe as any in the Kirk or countrey saU be, and saU doe our utter power and travaUl for the maintaining of the Uberties of our Kirk in everie thing ; quhairin we doubt not bot ye wUl schow yourselves conformable. We have heirin also insert the article direct by his Majestie : — Anent the GeneraU Assemblie we cannot resolve, in respect of the busines that is in both the realmes, befor the approaching ParUament ; bot this being endit, we sail have occasion to advyse and direct the most expedient for the weiU of the Kirk." And sua we committ yow to God. " From Edinbrough, the seventh day of Junij 1605. " Your Brethreine the Commissioners of the GeneraU Assemblie. " Lawrestoun. " Mr Patrick Galloway." ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 385 Thus did they both cast the dyet of the Assemblie in ane uncertaintie by desiring ane jindeflnit prorogation, against all law and preceiding exampUe ; and, farder, by polUcie in poynting out a wrong day, craftUlie indeavouring to bring the brethrein to the slipping of the lawfuU day, and to involve them in the guiltines of ane unlawfuU convention upon ane day not designed. Yet the Laird of Lawrestoun and remanent CounseUors of that sort, justlie fear ing the weaknes of this letter, thoght meitt to direct chairges for staying of the said AssembUe ; quhUk were delyvered for this pur pose to the Laird of Lawrestoun. About this tyme Mr John Forbes, being in Edinbroughe, and hearing that sic chairges wer ordained to be used, went to the ChanceUour *, and, efter sum conference in that matter, the Chan ceUour condiscendit to stay the chairges, and only to use ane letter of requeist, upon the said Mr John his promeiss to imploy his cre dit with his brethrein, for procuiring that no more sould be done in that Assemblie, except only ane continuation of the effaires of the AssembUe to ane uther tyme ; quhUk letter he promeissed to send with one of his owne, and not with Lawrestoun ; the said Mr John Forbes willing him to doe so, justUe fearing the Laird of Lawres toun, as being whoUie addicted to the pleasour of the Commis sioners. Thus did Mr John Forbes, according to his promeiss to his Majestie, for staying aU farder occasion of trouble quhilk might aryse be so violent opposition to the disciphne of the Kirk ; as lyk- wayes to keep the Kirk in possession of her own privUedge, yet so as aU just occasion and matter of any offence sould be taken away, nothing being done bot the dyet continued, t that therefter the Commissioners might bewray themselffes plainhe (if they con sented not therwith) that they wer seiking more themselffes then his Majestie, and the establishing of their own tyrannie by the utter overthrow of the discipline. Howsoever in that buik, intituUed " A Declaration of the just causes of his Majesties proceeding against those Ministers, who are now lying in prison, attainted of high Treason. Set foorth by his Majesties Counsell of his king- * Alexander Seaton, Earl of Dunfermline. f '• *¦ Delayed. 2b 386 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE dome of Scotland," * Anno 1606, (pp. 5, 6, 7,) ther be meikle spoken of the indevour and bussines of wicked men, for crossing his Majes tie's mynd and guid intention by secret suggestions, plotting, &c. ; yet this is aU that bussines quhilk any of these that conveined at Aberdeine did use in that matter, aUthogh it had beine nothmg amisse, aUbeit in so weightie a matter, upon so manifold occasions, they had manifested sum greatter fideUitie and watchfullnes then they did. CAP. X. OF THE ASSEMBLIE HAULDEN AT ABERDEIN AND PROCEEDINGS THEROF. The Presbitries and Synods, (sum haveing no wayes seine the saids letters of advyse, befor the Commissioners chossen and direct be them to Aberdein, wer depairted to keep the dyet,) did, upon the first letter of continuation direct to them from Perth by the Commissioners the yeare of God preceding, elect their Commis sioners. Uthers, haveing resaived the letter a very few days befor the dyet, compairing the informaUitie of the last letter of continu ation with the warrands of the GeneraU AssembUe, Act of Parha ment, and Act of the Assembhe at Halyrudhouse forsaid, and necessitie of the tyme, thoght themselffes more obleidged to obey the saids statutes and lawes then the naked advysse of these men, contrair therto in their letter, wherby they usurped power, not only of altering and delaying the dyets of the GeneraU Assembhe against the ordinance at Halyrudhouse, bot of casting the Kirk by the uncertaintie of aU futur ordinar meitting, according to law and custom inviollablie observed hitherto, (be leaveing both tym and * The above is the title of the official Declaration, which was " Imprinted at Lon don by Robert Barker, Printer to the King's most Excellent Majestie. Anno 1606," 4to, pp. 45. It is inserted in Calderwood's History, vol. vi. p. 419. A counter-state ment, says Dr M'Crio, was published by the Ministers, under the title of " Faithful Report of the Proceedings anent the Assembly of Ministers at Aberdene," printed in England in 1606. (Life of Melville, vol. ii. p. 116.) ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 387 place undesigned, *) in danger of forfaulting their hberty and loosing their AssembUe. Therfore they elected ordourhe their com missioners, and sent them to keip the said Assembhe ; sum the 2d of Juhj, haveing persaived the fraud of the last letter in name- ing the fyfth day ; uthers, not marking the said errour, directed their commissioners to the fyfth day. Quhairupon it feU out that the AssembUe haulden the second day, be sic as were direct therto, was so rare, that they [were] not exceiding the number of nineteen commissioners ; and that the rest, who wer direct accord ing to the last fraudulent letter,! did not cum to Aberdein tUl the fourth and fyfth dayes, efter the Assemblie was dissolved. And sum Presbitries, being casten in doubt to be dissappoynted in respect of the diversitie of dyets designed in the two letters, did stay from sending their commissioners, aUbeit they had chossen them. Upon the 2d of Juhj, ther assembled, from dyvers Presbitries and provinces, Mr Robert Durie, Mr Andrew Duncane, Alex ander Strachan, Mr John Sharp, Mr John Monro, Mr David Raitt, Mr Charles Ferme, Mr WUliam Forbes, Mr James Irving, Mr Robert Youngson, Mr John Forbes, Mr Archibald Black- burne, Mr James Rose, Mr Robert Reid, Mr WiUiam David son, Mr David Robertson, Mr Alexander Scrogie, Mr John Rough, and Mr James MiU; of whom, efter sermon maid be Mr James Ross, minister at Aberdein, sic as were present therat, conveined in the Kirk with the Laird of Lawrestoun, who was there present, and supposing diverse brethrein to be hindred in their journey by injurie of weather, (being extraordinar, in respect of the tym of yeir,) in hope and expectation of their coming, by mutuaU consent both of Lawrestoun his Majestie's Commissioner and them, they continued their downsitting tiU two houres efter- noon ; at quhat tym they meet in the session house within the Kirk of Aberdein, and sanctified their meitting in the name of Jesus, by prayer to God be Mr David Raitt, Moderatour of the Synod of Aberdein, in absence of Mr Patrick GaUoway. At quhat * Unappointed. t See foot note to p. 33. 2 B 2 388 ' CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE time the Laird of Lawrestoun, coming in and sitting doun among them, did mak no impediment to their assembhng, as thoght it had bein a privat conventickUe, seditiousUe, contemptuouslie or in disdaine of his Majestie's princeUe commandement and authoritie royaU, convocat as in the forsaid buik of " Declaration" is aUedged, p. 17. Bot efter he had signified his good wUl and favour in not useing any chairge against them, albeit he might have done so, to stay their meitting, he did present ane missive letter from the Lords of the Secreit CounseU, showing that he had rather chossen to use their friendly requeist, in hope it sould be obeyed. Thus first was the condition maid with Mr John Forbes broken be the ChaunceUor, in sending this missive with Lawrestoun. The letter being presented, becaus it was direct on the back in thir words, — " To our traist Freinds, the Brethrein of the Minis- trie conveined at their Assembhe in Aberdein," — it was layed asyde untill Mr John Forbes was chossen Moderator, be consent of Law restoun first nameing him to that effect. The forme of the proceid- ing herein with Lawrestoun, and in the rest of that action, because it is descryved afterward at length in the Declaration of their pro ceidings sent to his Majestie, we leave it to that place, only spe- ciefieing heir the principaU things done at this tyme. The letter, efter the election of the Moderatour, was redd, the tennour quhairof was as foUowes : — " Traist Friends, — Efter our hartiUie commendationes: Hear ing that ye have appoynted ane AssembUe to be haulden and keiped ther at Aberdein, in the month of Julij nixt to cum, quhairby the King's Majestie may take some occasion of offence against yow, seeing neither [has] his Majesty bein maid privie to your resolu tions, nor yet hes his Hienes consent and aUowance bein sought and obtained to that effect, according to the law and custome in- violablie observed thir many yeires bygane : We have therefore ' thoght meit heirby to advyse yow to considder of this matter, as appertaineth, and wyslie to forsie quhat prejudice sic rash and un- advysed proceidings may draw upon yowr estaites. For we are per swadit, if ye proceid to the haulding of this Assemblie, without his estate of the kirk. 389 Majesty's approbation and allowance, that his Hienes will very hardhe digest that matter, and wiU accompt the same as ane con tempt touching his Majestie in a heigh degrie. And, therfor, it is our wUl and pleasour, and we think it meit and expedient for your own weUls, the peace of the Kirk, and for entertaining and cher- rishing of that Christian harmonie quhilk sould be betwixt his Majestie and yow, that ye dissolve yourselves, repair every one to Ms owne home and caUing, and suffer this meitting to desert ; and afore ye appoynt any new meitting and Assemblie, that ye acquaint his Majestie therwith, quhairby, as ye saU testifie your obedience and conformitie to his Majestie's will and his lawes, swa we doubt not bot his Majestie, upon your own suit and supplication, will in reason give yow contentment and satisfaction heirin. We have at greatter length communicat our mynd in this matter to the Laird of Lawrestoun, one of his Majestie's Privie CounseU, who will at lenth impart the same to yow. And swa we committ yow to God. " From Edinbroughe the twentie day of Junij 1605. " Your good friends, Montroise, Commissioner. Alexander,* CanceUarius. Blantyre,! Secretar. J. CoCKBURNE.f John Prestoun. § " By this letter, besydes other preceiding reasons of the lawfull authoritie of that meitting, it may be judged, if it may be trewly aUeadged, or yet according to the CounseU's own opinion and knowledge at that tyme, that the Ministers proudlie, seditiouslie and most falslie termed and maintained their convention to be a GeneraU Assemblie ; the letter being direct to them conveined at their Assemblie, and desiring that it sould dissolve without nomi- * The Lord Chancellor, Alexander, Earl of Dunfermline, see p. 385. t Walter Stewart, Commendator of Blantyre, and created Lord Blantyre. t Sir John Cockburn of Ormiston. I § John Prestoun of Fentonbarns, afterwards Lord President. 390 certaine records touching the nation of ane uther day. Heirin again, condition and promeiss maid be my Lord ChaunceUour was violat, in that it being agried that a continuatione sould be maid to ane uther tyme, the letter [did] inhibite the appoynting of any day, and so requyred a depart ing from that privUedge and ordour estabUshed be Act of Parlia ment, ordained to be observed in aU tym comeing be the ordinance of the Assembhe at Halyrudhous, with his Majestie's consent, and heirtofor continuaUie practissed be the Kirk. The Ministers, not withstanding, concluded to dissolve without treating any of the effaires of the Assemblie, aUbeit the tyme did most necessarly requyre that they sould have done utherwayes ; and offered the designation of the dyet of the nixt Assembhe to the Laird of Law restoun, according as he pleassed, long or short, upon whose re- fuissaU, they sett doun their ordinance and answers to the CounseU's letter. The ordinance was as foUowes : — " QuhUk letter and desyre therm contained, with the suite and desyre of his Majestie's Commissioner agreeing therto, being ryplie considered be the said Assemblie, and haveing weighed the weightines of the effaires necessar to be intreated,* and rarenes of their own number, (dyvers of the Commissioners being stayed by the tempest of weather,) and willing them, as at aU tymes, to witnes f their wUlingnes to satisfie his Majestie and Lords of the Secreit CounseU in aU their reassonable desyres, in swa far foorth as might stand with the Word of God, and testimonie of a good con science ; thoght meit and expedient to continue the intreating of the effaires pertaining -to the said Assembhe to the last Twysday of September nixt following, and to dissolve for the present, ac cording to the suit and desyre of the letter forsaid ; and ordaines intimation and wairning to be maid to aU the Presbitries within the land to choose their Commissioners, and to send them autho rized with power, to the said Assembhe to be haulden at Aberdein, the last Twysday of September nixt to cum, Anno 1605 yeires." After the quhilk ordinance, his Majestie's Commissioner maid * Treated of. t Give a proof of. estate of the kirk. 391 protestation, that from the begining he did not acknowledge their present meitting for ane lawfuU Assemblie, in respect of the ab sence of the last Moderatour and Clerk ordinar. The Moderatour, Mr John Forbes, in name of the brethrein, protested again, that the said meitting was, and behoved to be, ane lawfull Assemblie, in respect of the warrand of their meitting, on the said day befor specified, subscryved be himselff, the direction of the Word of God, lawes of the land, and continuall custome of the Kirk, and their commissions from their Presbitries and Synods to. that effect. Heirupon the Laird of Lawrestoun caused John Wishart, messin- ger, chairge the brethrein there assembled, to suffer the said Assem bhe to desert, under the pain of horning. The tennour of the letters followes : — " James, &c. — ForsameUdle as aUbeit we have signified our wUl and pleasour, that We cannot be resolved anent the Generall As sembUe afore the approaching ParUament, and the Parliament being ended, that We wiU have occasion to direct that which is maist ex pedient for the weill of the Kirk ; nevertheless We and the Lords of our Secret Counsell are informed, that in this meantyme ther is ane GeneraU Convention and AssembUe of the Ministrie appoynted to be haulden at our broughe of Aberdein, in the month of Julij nixt to come, quhairat a number of the Ministrie of this our realme intends to be present, we being nowayes acquainted and forseene therof, nor yet our consent and aUowance bein had and obtained to that effect, according to the lawes, acts, and constitutions maid theranent, and to the custome observed heirin thir many yeires bygane ; quhairby our direction and commandment in this matter wUl be violat, heighlie to the contempt and offence of Us, our authoritie and lawes. Our wUl is heirfor, and we chairge yow straitlie and command, that incontinent thir Our letters sein, ye pas, and in Our name and authoritie, command and chairge the haUl Ministrie who saU happen to convein at the said AssembUe per- sonaUie, if they can be apprehendit, and faUyeing therof, be oppen proclamation at the mercat crosse of Aberdein, that they suffer the said Assemblie to desert, repair every one to his own dwelling and 392 certaine records touching the chairge, and that they on nawayes presume and tak upon hand to convein and assemble themselves togither in ony place, for keiping of the said AssembUe, under the paine of rebelhon and putting of them to our home. As aUso, that ye command and chairge the Proveist and BaiUyies of the said brough of Aberdein, that they suffer not sic AssembUe, Convention or meitting of the Ministrie to be keiped within that Towne, as the said Proveist and BaiUyies will answer to Us and our Secreit CounseU, upon the dewtifuU dis- chairg of their offices. The quhilk to doe," &c. This chairge being delyvered be John Wishart, subscryved be him, to the Moderatour, redd and considered, the Moderatour, at command of the brethrein, took note and document in the hand of the said messenger, being ane ndttar-pubhct, that they wer readie instanthe to obey the tennour of the said chairge. The said mes senger refuissing the benefite of his office in that pairt, the Mo derator, with the rest of the brethrein, efter incalling of the name of God, dissolved, and depairted out of the Kirk for obedience to his Majestie's chairge, and went directlie to the Common Clerk's wrytting chalmer of the broughe of Aberdein, and tuik notes and instruments of their obedience to the command and chairge of the saids letters in the hands of the Common Clerk forsaid, and uther two nottars with him ; the tennour quhairof foUowes : — " At Aberdein, the second day of Juhj, the yeir of God 1605 yeirs, in the Common Clerk's wrytting chalmer of the brough of Aberdein, at half-hour to fyve, efternoon, or therby, in presence of his connottars and witness underwritten, compeired personaUie the Commissioners of the ministrie of this realme efter foUowing : — They are to say, Mr Robert Durie, minister at Anstruther; Mr Andrew Duncane, minister at Carrel ; Mr John Sharp, minister at Kilhnanie ; Mr Alexander Strachan, * minister at Creich; Mr John Forbes, minister at Allfoord ; Mr WiUiam Forbes, minister at * In Forbes's MSS. some of these names are incorrectly written, both here and at page 387 : viz. Ilewingstoun for Youngson ; Straquaine for Strachan ; Baith and Zifith for Baitt ; and Koch for Rough. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 393 Kinbethok ; Mr James Irwing, minister at Touche ; Mr Robert Youngson, minister at Clat ; Mr Robert Reid, minister at Ban- chrie-Trinitie ; Mr Charles Ferme, minister at Fraserbroughe ; Mr WUliam Davidson, minister at Rathin; Mr David Robert son, minister at Longley ; Mr John Munro, minister at Tain ; Mr David Raitt, minister at Machar, and PrincipaU of the CoUege of Old Aberdeen ; Mr Archibald Blackburn, minister at Aber deine ; Mr James Ross, minister ther ; Mr John Rough, minister at Nig ; and Mr James MiU, minister at Innerrowrie ; and aUedg ed, that they being conveined in the session-house of the kirk of this broughe of Aberdeine, this day, as at the appoynted day and place for haulding of the GeneraU Assemblie of the ministrie of this realme, they wer chairged be John Wischart, messenger, be vertew of his Majestie's letters, given be act of his Hienes Secreit Counsell, of the dait, at Edinbrough, the 20th day of Junij last bypast, within the space of ane quarter of ane hour since, that they sould suffer their Assemblie to desert, repair every one of them to theE own dweUings and chairge, and that they on no wayes presume, nor tak upon hand to convein nor assemble themselffes in any place, for keiping of the said Assemblie, under the paine of horneing, — as the coppie of the saids letters, quhUks they shew to us, connottars and witness underwritten, subscryved, as appeared, be the said John Wishart, messinger, proports :* And that for obedience to the command and chairg of the saids letters, they instantly, efter the giving of the said chairge, and in- calling of the name of God, dissolvit without any farder action, and cam immediatlie foorth of the said session-house and kirk, to the said Common Clark's chalmer, at the west end of the Tooll- booth of the said broughe, as to the most publict place, to tak notes and instruments of their obedience to the command and chairge of the said letters, and dissolving of the said Assemblie, in the hands of us connottars under subscryvand ; and heirupon, they craivit and took instruments, day, month, hour, year, and place forsaid, befor thir witness, Alexander Forbes of Fingask, * Testifies. 394 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE David Ronaldsoii, John TiUidaff, Mathew Donaldson, John Kemp, baker, Alexander Thomson, skinner, burgesses of Aber dein ; Mr George Spence, servitour to the said Mr John Forbes, and Thomas Forbes, son to Thomas Forbes elder, burges of Aberdein. (Sic subscribitur) " Ita est Magister Thomas Mollesonus, Scriba Communis lurgi de Aberdein Notarius Publicus, ac testis adprcemissa requisitus. " Ita est Mr Gulielmus Reid, Connotarius Publicus, in prcemissis rogatus et requisitus ad hcec manu sua. " Ita est Walterus Robertson,* Connotarius Publicus, in prcemissis rogatus et requisitus, testatum his meis signo et subscriptione manualibus." Heirafter they departed every man, and conveined nowayes again in any uther pairt for haulding of the said Assembhe. The answer quhUk they made to the Lords of Secreit CounseU's letter, and sent to them, was as follows : — " the spirit of grace, wisdom, and of the fear of the lord, be in and upon your lordships for salutation. " Having in aU reverence resaived, redd and considered your Lordships letter direct to us with the Laird of Lawrestoun, we have therto conformed ourselves in our proceidings, so far as pos- sibUie we aither might or could with the testimonie of ane good conscience ; for aUbeit we were heir lawfuUie assembUed not upon any privat appoyntment of our owne, bot upon the lawfull warrand of God's Word, the lawes of this land, custome of the Kirk, and speciaU direction of his Majestie's Comnussioner, the Laird of Lawrestoun, and Mr Patrick GaUoway, Moderatour of the last GeneraU Assemblie, with consent of the remanent Commissioners t In the Mt>. Roteon, for Ro'son, or Robertson. estate of the kirk. 395 therof, sent to us hi wryt, quhilk we have, and saU be in readynes to produce, to justifie that we have not assembled ourselves with out his Majestie's consent and aUowance, and so no wayes unad- vysedUe, nor hi contempt of his Majestie ; yet notwithstanding, for satisfieing of your Lordships desyre, whom in the Lord we are and saUbe about aUwayes to obey, we have desisted, and, upon the sight of your Lordships letter, resolved to desist, from intreating, rea soning, votting, or concludmg any of the weightie effaires, quhilk our caUing, and necessitie therby layd upon us, in so necessar ane tyme, did inforce us to, and did conclude to dissolve ourselves and depairt to our own particular chairges, only appoynting ane uther day for our AssembUe, quhairunto we have continued aU things ; quhUk, as it can minister no just occasion of offence to his Majestie nor your Lordships, so it was most necessarlie requyred of us for dischairge of our dewtie to God, the Kirk, and our own consciences, lest by the testimonie of aU these thrie we sould be found and judged the very first and only abrogators of the lawfuU jurisdiction, Ubertie and privUedges of the CounseUs of God's house, for order ing therof, — quhUk our deserting of this present Assemblie, without affixing ane uther particular day therunto, had plainhe imported ; and farder, we sould have bein found manifest oppeners of ane gap to the oppen breach and violation of the lawes and statutes of this realm. QuhUk being considered be your Lordships, we doubt not bot your Lordships wiU apprehend and weigh, how both unneces- sarly, unadvysedlie, and unjustUe, such wrong sould have bein used against us be the Laird of Lawrestoun, as to have execute any chairge of horning, for obtaining that, quhairunto we had aUreadie given aU humble obedience, at the suit of your Lordships letter and requeist. Swa looking that our obedience saU purchase your Lordships favourable asistance, at his Majestie's hands, to mak his Hienes reason to be satisfied, and favourabhe to permitt unto us the Ubertie estabUshed, both in the Word of God and his Hienes lawes, we hairtUlie and humbUie committ your Lordships, and aU your proceidings, to the mercifull direction and protection of God. " From our Assemblie at Aberdein the 2d of Julij 1605." 396 certaine records touching the Let the indifferent Reader here judge quhat aither schow of dis daining his Majestie's authoritie and royaU comandments, or ap pearance of contempt, was herein committed be the Ministers, quhUk justlie might minister matter of offence to his Majestie, as is aUedged in the forsaid book of " Declaration," page 14 ; let be of avenging himselff by justice, and the ordinar course therof upon them; and quhat aither justice, or ordinarie course therof, was keeped by these that efterward did persew them so extraordinarhe, as wUl appear in the proceidings following : or yet quhat strange errour they had faUen in, or aberration, that by such extreamitie they behoved to be caUed bak again to the path-way of obedience, who as yet had faUen in no schaddow of disobedience : and if there be any thing in this haUl course, either to be pitied, or esteimed abominable, whither it be not raither in those who, being judges professing Christ, did so pervert justice against the servands of Christ, for doeing his wiU and work of their ministrie : or, if it be in the ministrie, whither it be not rather in sic as, contrair to their calling and lawes of the land, did associat themselffes in judgment with those counseUors, against their brethrein, as in the historie of their trouble subsequent wiU appear. Upon Thursday the 4th of Juhj, by reason of the forsaid deceit- fuU errour of the Commissioners letter, cam to Aberdein, sent to keip the Assemblie, from the provinces of Air, GaUoway, TividaUl, Lowthiane, Mr John Welsh, Mr NathaneeU EigUes, Mr James Greg, Mr John Young, Mr Thomas Abernethie, Mr Archibald Sympson, Mr NathaneeU Harlaw, and Mr Abraham Hendersoun ; who, finding the Assemblie dissolved befor their coming, resaived ane authentick coppie of the processe therof, subscryved be Mr John Forbes, Moderatour, and Mr John Sharp, Clerk, delyvered unto Mr John Welsh be the said Mr John Forbes, and past to the place quhair the Assemblie was haulden, and took note and instru ment, that they were come according to their commissions, to have keiped the said Assemblie with their brethrein ; bot finding it dis solved befor their coming, and haveing resaived ane just coppie of the proceidings therof, subscryved lawfuUie be the Moderatour estate of the kirk. 397 and Clerk, they, for fulfilling of their commission, protested and took instrument that they, in their own names, and in the names of those who did send them, ratified and approved the haul proceid ings of the said Assemblie. On Fryday the fyfth day of Juhj, cam John Ross from the Synod of Perth, in lyk maner direct to the said day, upon the un- spyed errour of the Commissioners letter ; who haveing heard by these who cam the day befor, quhat had bein done, did in lyk maner, in the place quhair the Assembhe was halden, tak instru ment of his approbation, in name of these who sent him, both in words and substance, agrieing with the former. CAP. XI. A SHORT NOTE OF THE CALUMNIES UTTERED IN THE FORESAID DECLARATION AGAINST THESE MINISTERS FOR THEIR MEITTING AT ABERDENE. These are the persons who conveined out of eight sundrie Synods ; this was the maner and form of their conveining ; and this is the substance of aU their proceiding ; quhilk hes bred such mis contentment, and hes bein with so violent a hattred both of Coun- seUors and Commissioners, so extreamly persecuit in the persons of these men ; aUbeit nothing was done by them except a new dyet appoynted, [and] aU things therto continued.* Concerning the persons of them who conveined, they wer such as to whom their brethrein wer not ashamed nor affrayed, (quhatsoever opprobreous show of the unworthines, inabUhtie, and smaU gifts, in these per sons is made in the foresaid book of " Declaration,") to committ the credit of so grave a commission in so weightie a matter ; God so disposing for his own glorie, who wUl have the praise to himselff alone, of that power and wisdome, quhairby, in the most weak and vyUe, he does magnifie himselff against the power and wisdom of this world ; when as yet sould appear, that quhatsoever exceUencie * Delayed, 398 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE of power is found in them upholding them, in so grevious tryeUs, quhairwith he was to exerceiss them, was not of themselffes bot of God, in whom alone aU creatours sould glorie : quhairof, if Chris tians in thir dayes did rightlie remember, and wer not raither led by nature then by grace, they would not have so, in respect of the persons depryved God of his just praise, in reproaching the pro ceedings, becaus of the persons, seeing it pleasses the Lord to mak his power perfyte through weaknes. Bot so it is indeed, that these persons are most content to rejoyce in their infirmitie, reproaches, persecution and anguish for Christ his sake, that his power may dweU in them, and his vertew [be] maid manifest in their weaknes, leaving it so to uthers to glorie in themselffes for that quhilk is not their own. Yet may it appear strange, when sic persons of sic inabUlitie, unworthines, and smaU gifts, could so overruUe (as is aUeged in the " Declaration") the rest of their pure [poor] brethrein, and get such advantage over them by reason of their simphcitie, (too simpUe indeid if by such they sould be overruUed,) as to have them in a maner tyed to their girdles, to consent to any thing quhatsoever. This farr is knowen, that if these men had bein so overruUed with a burning desyre of vain glorie, that they would labour to mak themselffes famous, as by the foresaid " Declaration" is affirmed, they neided not foUow that burner of the Temple of Diana, haveing oft refussed the chieffest preferments, whilk now are so greediUie imbraced be these who, stryveing to cover their infamie, and to escaip the just deserved punishment of their shamfuU perjurie and apostasie from the sinceritie of the gospeU, have with that temple burner, sett fyre in the Hous of God with spytfuU violence, seiking the overthrow of their brethrein, whose lawfuU proceidings, accord ing to the established and daylie practeissed order of government of this Kirk, did somewhat imped their resolutionj by overthrowing therof to induce * the abjured and damnable disorder of that anti christian Hierarchie. Surelie if his Majestie's purpose was, conforme to his Hienes * Gibson's MS. has, " to bring in and set up." ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 399 lawes, his most Christiane profession, oath and subscriptione, to maintaine that Government quhilk in his foresaid Act of Parlia ment, 1592, is acknowledged be his Hienes and his Estaites to be most just, good and godhe in the selff ; quhUk only in thir respects must neids be most comeUe, and aUso most able, both to preserve puritie of trew profession, and to procuir the establishing of a sohde peace and quyetnes in this Kirk ; ther can be no envy nor grudging, at the progresse of such a good matter, espyed in these Ministers who conveined at Aberdein, neither any purpose to hinder or crosse so good a work, bot, by the contrair, ane earnest intention, and purpose, and desyre, to maintain and preserve the samen. Bot if the authors of the said " Declaration of the Just Causses of his Majestie's (or rather, their own) Proceiding against those Ministers," do understand by that solid and comlie order, that quhilk was not so much his Majestie's purpose, as their advyse and intention, by abohshing of that only just, good and godly jurisdiction and government of this Kirk, to bring in again, — that image of the Beast, most fit, indeid, for the impuritie of their profession, (and so it appeares they mean by these words, in their own reassons, in their Declaration, " puritie of our profession ;") in that caice these Ministers are no wayes to deny their purpose and endeavour, to the uttermost of their power, both in his Majes tie's presence and absence, to resist sic iniquitie, albeit neither be secreit suggestion, false calumnies, plotting or combination, bot by oppen profession and declaration of the trueth, and testification and maintainance thereof, according to their oath and covenant maid with the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, in most lawfuU and orderUe maner, conform to their caUing ; quhilk, indeid, is the trew cause of such extreame rigour used against them be these CounseUors, who, in their declaratione proponing aU things in gene raU, without specifieing in particular quhat is the government be the ministrie impugned, do subtillie insinuat in the mynds of the simple ane suspition of some unlawfuU opposition maid be them to his Majestie's lawfull and godUe intentions, knowing that if they had opened up the particulars, they sould have maid their 400 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE own iniquitie manifest and Christ's ministers innocencie evi dent to aU men. Bot leaving aU things to the " Declaration," quhilk their proceidings efterward saU make of their mynd to the Eeader, we cum to that quhilk ensewed ; for the quhUk we have speciaUie sett down the former description of the Estaite of the Kirk in this land. THE SECOND BOOKE. CONTAINING THE IMPRISONING OF THE MINISTERS THAT WER COMMISSIONERS AT THE ASSEMBLIE OF ABERDENE, TOGETHER WITH SUCH THINGS AS FOLLOWED THEREAFTER, UNTILL THE PARLIAMENT OF PERTH, AND BANISHING OF THE MINISTERS. CAP. I. TOUCHING THE IMPRISSONMENT OF THE SEX MINISTERS COM MITTED TO THE CASTELL OF BLAKNES. The Laird of Lawrestoun, fearing that the Commissioners, whose authoritie did now cease, sould be aU meanes procuir his disgrace, becaus he had suffered the Assembhe to be fensed, and ordourhe continued to ane new day, be advyse taken in his return ing southward to Edinburgh, did privUie resolve to suppress the charge given personaUy to the Ministers, and instead therof, did cause the officer indorse, as thogh the letters had bein publictlie execute at the mercat crosse of Aberdein, against the Ministers, on Monday the first of Juhj, befor their Assemblie ; heirby to bring the ministers in danger of rebeUion by a forged and fals execution, becaus, utherways, he could not sie how to bring aither themselffes within the compas of a law, or to get their proceidings quarreUed as unlawfuU. Yet so it pleassed the Lord to govern that matter, that before his coming to the CounseU, Mr John Welshe, in his returning home, went to the ChaunceUor ; and he enquyring, Jf \ there was any act maid against the Bischops and Commissioners ? he assured his Lordship there* was none maid, neither any uther thing done except the continuation ; and to verifie that, did show him the authentick coppie of the proceeding of the AssembUe, 2c 402 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE together with the protestation of their ratification therof, and informed his Lordship in aU that was done at the Assembhe : — QuhUk he approved and aUowed, affirming, that if there was no more done, there was no wrong done ; and that Mr John Forbes was ane honest man, and had keiped promeiss to him. Therefter, lykewayes, Mr James Balfour, and Mr Walter BaU- canquell, ministers of Edinburgh, went to the ChaunceUour, who being informed, that ane Act had bein maid in Aberdein against the Bischops and Commissioners, accuissed Mr- John Forbes to them of break of promeiss ; quhairin, they haveing resolved his Lordship that no sic Act was maid, nor any thing done, except the fensing of the Assembhe, and continuing it to a new day, his Lordship againe approved their proceidings, testifiemg that if there was no more done, there was no wrong done. Upon this testimonie, the Ministers being in securitie, and expecting no trouble, the Laird of Lawrestoun did give in to the CounseU the forsaid forged chairge and indorsation, and pretended pubhct execution of the forsaids chairge, containing two witness aUanerhe, * both his own domesticks, and complaining heavilhe upon the ministers, as con temners of his Hienes command, adding many uther caUumnies, as efterward wUl appear, eamestUe dealt with the Lords to direct ther uther letters for denouncing them to the home. At whose , desyr, aUbeit the said pretendit execution was contrair to the direction given him be the CounseU, at his goeing to Aberdein, they haveing commanded him to use no chairge, untUl first he sould resaive answer to their missive letter ; and aUthough it was against aU preceiding example or practeiss to pas sic ane Ordinance, the pairtie never being called to answer, and was so maintained be divers weUl affected of the CounseU ; yet did the forsaids Lords, ' glaid of sic occassion against the Kirk, ordaine letters to be direct^ simpliciter to denounce aU that wer at the AssembUe, the second of Julij, to the home. QuhUk coming to the knowledge of Mr James Balfour and uthers, the ministrie in ther pairts, they did earnestlie travell with the ChaunceUour and remanent Lords, that * Only. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 403 sic a preparative, so contrair to aU lawes and custome, heirto- for observed, sould not pas against the persons of their brethrein ; bot they could prevaUl nothing. Quhairupon they maid adverteis ment to their brethrein in aU pairts, against whom the saids letters wer direct, that they might repair to Edinbrough for their own releiff. QuhaEupon, Mr John Forbes coming from the North, and finding diverse of the rest of his brethrein in Edinbrough, they resolved to give in ane supphcation to the CounseU, desyring to be hard in that matter, and ane day appoynted to them to heir and sie the said pretendit chairge and execution reduced and im- proven as fals and forged, and lykwayes their reasons, quhairfor no sic chairg could nor ought lawfuUie to be direct against them in the execution of their calUngs, wiUing and requesting the Lords, in the mean tym, to suspend their forsaid ordinance allreadie maid in their prejudice, and execution of the letters of horning against them to be stayed. WhUl they were conveined for penning of this supphcation on Thursday the 25th of Julij, the Lords of the CouncU and Commis sioners of the Kirk understanding that Mr John Forbes was come to the toun the night before, they conveined themselffes be sex hours in the morning, to wit, the Earle of Montrois, Great Com missioner ; the Earle of Dumfermhng, Lord ChaunceUour ; the Earle of Dumbar, Lord Thesaurer ; the Laird of BaUmirrinoch, Lord President ; Sir John Skene, Lord ControUer, and Sir Tho mas HamUtoun, Lord Advocat, Knights ; the Laird of Lawrestoun; and with them some of the forsaids pretendit Commissioners, of whom some had resaived the style and title of Bischops, Mr Patrick GaUoway, Mr John Spottiswood, Mr John HaU, Mr James NicoUsoun, Mr Andrew Lamb, Mr James Law, a mixture in judg ment of civill effaires in CounseU, uncouth,, unaccustomed, and heirtofor in this land neither practeissed nor heard of: who directed ane meassor [macer] to Mr John Forbes, without any chairge, desyring him to cum and speak with them ; who, coming befor them and being demandit of certaine questions touching the said Assem blie, and speciaUie quhat was his judgment touching the lawfuU- 2c2 404 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE nes of it, answered, that it became him not to judge of that actione quhairin himselff was ane actour, but did, [with] aU humihtie, sub mitt himselff and proceidings in that whoU Assembhe, to the judg ment of the nixt GeneraU Assemblie. Yet stUl being urged upon his privat oppinion, he did give it without prejudice of the judg ment forsaid, to the quhilk he did submitt himselff in approveing of the lawftdlnes of that Assembhe. Quhairupon, without farder occasion, accusation, or conviction of any offence or cryme, he was commanded to enter in waird in the CasteU of Edinburgh, tiU he sould be transported to Blaknes. Quhairat he greatlie marvelling, seeing no mention at aU was maid of the forsaid pretendit chairge, nor any disobedience therof objected to him, bot only the not obeying of the CounseU's missive, he demandit of their Lordships for quhat cause he sould enter in waird. The ChaunceUor answer ed, Becaus it was the King's wiU. Quhairupon he was delyvered to the guard and convoyed to the CasteU, quhair he entered in waird. Therefter, from the forsaid compossed CounseU, a sumonds was direct with ane meassor, [macer] against Mr John Welsh, who was not at the AssembUe, bot only was one of these who afterward approved the proceidings therof, chairging him to com pear befor the CounseU upon the morne, at sevein houres in the morning; quhilk summonds was execute against him about nyn hours, as he accompanied with Mr Robert Durie, Mr Andrew Duncane, and diverse uther brethrein, wer going to the CasteU to visite Mr John Forbes. Thus it may appear, whither of malice against particular per sons, or of any just occasion of offence in their proceidings, this trouble was intendit, quhen, passing by those who wer at the Assemblie, (aUbeit present at that time,) these first were chopped, who, in the judgment of aU, were knowen to have bein particularhe mislyked be these CounseUors and Commissioners, for no uther cause bot that they could not wink at the enimitie of the one against Christ, nor bear with the cruiked courses of the uther. In the quhilk dewtie, aUbeit the rest were all alyke myndit, yet, becaus these two were esteimed of the CounseU and Commission- ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 405 ers to be most fordward, therfor was then- wraith cheiflie intendit against them, aUbeit experience therefter did teach them, that there was no less sinceritie, courage, and constant resolution in the rest of the brethrein, against their corruption and wickednes, and for the trueth, then in these two whom they so much feared. These are they two of whom it is reported in that " Declaration," that his Majestie had most just cause of offence against, the one for his great oversight in former tyme, and that the other had, most undewtifuUy in that same actioun, maid breach of some promisses, maid by him unrequyred to his Majestie himselff, very few months before : the first being spoken of Mr John Welsh, becaus befor he aUways had, in the most fervent zeal, declared himselff enemie to quhatsoever intention in King and CounseU quhilk was contrair to the trueth of God and only trew government of his house. Quhairupon, efter the foresaid trouble in Edinburgh, raised the 17th of December 1595, as said is, he having both gravely, wiselie and soUdUe, in great Ubertie and friedom of the Spirit, in the pulpit of Edinburgh, uttered the counsell and wiU of God to his Majestie and his CounseUors, not spairing to rebuik their knowen enormities, was forced for fear of his lyfe, being most hatefrdlie pursewed and sought for, to escaipe by withdrawing himselff, as the ministers of Edinbrough were lykwayes forced to doe, for a tym. The other being meant be Mr John Forbes, who laitlie had bein in England, and had conferred with his Majestie upon the estait of the Kirk in Scotland, of whom how unjustlie this is affirmed, the preceiding narration of his communication with his Majestie wiU evidentUe declair. Bot what is not frie to these men to speak, who make no conscience to give out in print impudent forgeries against a knowen trueth, as the book of the " Declaration of the Causes of their Proceidings against the said Ministers," doth cleirlie make manifest to aU who are never so slenderlie acquaint with that matter. Bot to give one proof for all of their disposition, the ChaunceUour, notwithstanding of his former approbation of the things done at Aberdein, and of Mr John Forbes his honestie in keiping promeiss 406 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE therin ; yet, efter report maid to his Majestie, finding that it was his Hienes wiU to quarreU with that AssembUe, he was not ascham- ed to lay it to Mr John Forbes his charge, quhen he was befor the CounseU, that he had broken promeiss to him in that matter : who being answered be the said Mr John, that promeiss was keiped be him als honestlie in that errand, as ever was be any with whom his Lordship dealt during his dayes, his Lordship maid no farder reply, bot that he had forgot himself then, if it was so. This con ference betwixt the ChanceUour and Mr John Forbes was marked and put up in memorie be the Bischops and Commissioners then present in CounseU, especiaUie be Mr John Spottiswood and Mr John HaU ; by the quhilk, althogh at that tym they took occasion to traduce the said Mr John, yet efterward did they take their ad vantage at his Majestie's hands, to procuir the ChaunceUor his dis grace, as suspected to be an enemie to the Estait of Bischops.* That day the Supphcation forsaid, penned be the Ministrie, for intreating the Counsell to suspend the execution of their ordinance touching their horning, tUl they sould be heard to improve the aUedged execution, given in be Laurestoun, was presented to the Counsell, but rejected and refused to be red. Mr John Welsh, upon the nixt day, compeiring befor the Coun seU, because he refuised to give his opinion before he heard the questions to be demandit of him, was committed to the ToUbooth, and both he and Mr John Forbes transported the same day to Blak- nes be the guard, and, according to the direction of the CounseU, in- clossed straitUe in severaU houses, t and keiped from the companie ane of uther, and aU other societie quhatsoever, no creatour, except their keiper, haveing access to them. But efterward, Mr John Welshe, upon his offer to give his oath upon the poynts contained in his summonds, the law inhibiting that any sould be compelled to give his oath super inquirendis, was sent for to Edinbrough, the 2d * He was suspected by the Bishops of being opposed to their temporalities. A parti cular account of the affair referred to in the text is given in the 12th chapter of this Book. f Gibson's MS. " roomes." ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 407 of August. The quhilk day aUso compeired befor the Counsell, Mr Robert Durie, Mr Andrew Duncan, Mr Alexander Straquhane and Mr John Sharp, beeing aU summoned befor the CounseU the said day ; who aU being examined upon the same tilings quhilk had bein proponed to Mr John Forbes, thefr answers agrieing aU in one, aU beit severaUie examined, and being in substance haiUie conform to that answer given be Mr John Forbes, wer aU commanded to enter in waird within the CasteU of Blaknes, quhair the said Mr John was, within the space of twentie-four hours. The same day conveined the lait Commissioners of the GeneraU Assembhe at Edinbrough, and notwithstanding of the ordinance touching their commission maid in the Assemblie at Halyrudhous, 1602, That it sould be given and used according to the Acts of the GeneraU Assemblie, quhilk plainhe ordained commissions to be given with limitation, and to continue only to the AssembUe nixt foUowing ; yet did they tak upon them to convein, censure, and judge of the Assembhe at Aberdein, the 2d of JuUj, and to con denme the same ; the brethrein who had keiped it being neither citted, heard, nor requyred to answer. This did they to maintain themselffes in their usurped authoritie and jurisdiction, lest, if that Assembhe of Aberdein sould be aUowed and reput lawfuU, the power of their commission Umited to the nixt AssembUe sould cease ; quhilk was the caus quhilk moved them to insist so rigoroushe against their brethrein, to compeU them to confess their AssembUe unlawfuU, and so of no force nor effect. Mr John Welsh, Mr Robert Durie, Mr Andrew Duncane, Mr Alexander Straquane and Mr John Sharp, according to the forsaid direction of the CounseU, entred in Blacknes the thrid of August. This is that superabundance of lenitie and patience aUedged in the book of " Declaration" forsaid, (p. 14,) used towards these minis ters, in suffering them to stay so long at home, efter their Assem blie, befor they wer committed, and spairing of them so long un- brought to their answer, and superceiding the ordinar course of law against them': the first two being committed the 25th day and 26th of Julij, and the uther four, the thrid of August. Yet in 408 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE one thing may the said aUeadgance be granted ; for surelie the course used against these ministers be the CounseU cannot weiU be caUed ane course of law or justice against them, meikle less ane ordinarie course of justice, seeing no law, and therfor, no justice, does permitt that frie subjects, naither suspect of trea^ son, nor convict of any cryme, sould be committed at the Coun seU's wUl and pleasour aUanerUe. Yet to mak it more manifest quhat cair these CounseUors had to use the ministers of Jesus Christ according to justice, they caussed denunce them to the home upon their forsaid act, procured be Lawrestoun, upon the false and forged execution, ane number of dayes efter they had committed them, contrair to aU law or practeiss preceiding. And aUbeit earnest traveU and moyan was used be diverse of the ministrie, sent in commission to that effect from sundrie Synods and Presbitries of the land, as aUso be certaine noblemen, barrons, and genteUmen, to obtain releiff and deUverie upon cawtione, to the said ministers in Blakness ; yet could no favour be purchassed to them, except they would have acknowledged their Assembhe to be unlawfuU, confesse ane offence committed be them for haulding it, and be their own judgment and sentence condemn and annuU it. The CounseU, in signe of their clemencie, hearing of the conso lation quhilk these ministers enjoyed from God, through their fel lowship in the crosse of Christ, did give out ane warrand to the guard, to transport Mr John Forbesse, Mr John Welsh, and Mr Robert Durie, to Dumbartoun ; quhilk directioun the Lord in his mercy stayed by his providence, that it was not put in execution, to their singular comfort. Therefter, the CounseU did pubhsh two proclamations about the twelff of August, the one dischairging aU Presbitries to direct any Commissioners for keiping the Assem blie, appoynted to hauld at Aberdein the last Twysday of Sep tember, and inhibitting the brough o£ Aberdein, and aU others, to resaive or admitt sic as sould be sent : the uther inhibitting aU Synods, Presbitries, Sessions and Ministers, to authorise, approve, justifie or allow, the Assemblie haulden at Aberdein, the 2d of Julij bypast, aither privathe or publictly, in their meittings, con- ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 409 ferences, or sermons ; and that, (besyde uther pretended reasons,) becaus the said Assemblie was disallowed and condemned be the Commissioners of the GeneraU AssembUe. About the sextein of August, befor the proclamation was pub lished, Mr Hendrie Blythe, minister of the Cannogait in Edin brough, was committed to Blaknes, becaus in his sermon he had heavUhe regratted the hard and rigorous intreatting of Mr John Forbes, and Mr John Welsh, at their first entring in waird. Yet could not that proceiding stay the Ubertie of uthers, in diverse pairts of the countrie, in rebuking the iniquity both of CounseUers and pretendit Commissioners of the Kirk, in committing thek brethrein, the servants of Jesus Christ, to prisson, they being naither chairged, caUed, nor convict for any cryme ; quhilk moved the CounseU to intend the lyk against certaine of them who spak go, speciaUie against Mr James BaUfour, and Mr Walter Balcan- queU, ministers of Edinbrough : bot they desisted for fear to pro- vok farder indignation against themselffes for sic unjust severitie. At this same tyme, Mr Robert Bruce, who had bein, by the pol Ucie of the said pretended Commissioners, restrained from his chairge and ministrie of Edinbrough for the space of five yeirs, under pretence of wairding him be his Majestie sic a space from Edmburgh, was committed to waird in Inchgarvie. CAP. II. THE SECOND BRINGING OF THE MINISTERS, THAT WERE IMPRIS- SONED IN BLACKNES, .BEFORE THE COUNSELL, AND LNDEVOUR OF THE COUNSELL BY INTERROGATOURS TO INTRAPPE THEM, AND BRING THEM WITHIN THE COMPASSE OF A LAW ; AND THE MINISTERS ANSWERS. The answers of the ministers committed to Blacknes concerning their Assemblie being sent to his Majestie, his Hienes, according to the information he had resaived, did return his will, directing certaine Questions to the CounseU to be proponed to the Ministers, 410 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE thinking thereby to bring them by their answers to some incon venients, as though they could not answer the questions, bot they behoved aither to condenme sumthing of ther own proceid ings, or give sum advantage to his Majestie in that qidulk speciaUie he sought. Heirwith, aUso, did his Majestie send ane letter, con taining a refutatione of the defence used be the ministers for their AssembUe, and proveing the authoritie of their meittings to flow from the Prince, as it is sett doun in the book of " Declaration" ; quhilk letter the CounseU keeped back from the ministers in waird, and sent it to the Presbitries, requyreing it to be published in the pulpits as a trueth so certaine and so sohdhe sett doun, that none could caU it in controversie. Yet the Presbitries, persaiving how prejudiciaU it was to their trew Christiane Ubertie, and how httle besetting the dignitie of the Prince, to pubhshe ane Declaration of such a stamp, so different from the print of his Majestie's coyne, and so contrair to his Hienes's both wisdom and pietie, they refuissed the pubhcation thereof; and be the contrair, some did pen ane answer to it, oppening up the insufficiencie of the argu ments therein contained, and, by many reasons, both justifieing the Ministers proceidings and proving the authoritie of the Assem blie to be immediatelie from Christ. The Questions wer sent by the CounseU to the ministers in Blaknes, the 24th of August, with ane chairge to compeir befor them at Perth, the 27th day of that same month, to answer to these interrogatours quhilk foUow : — " 1. What is ane GeneraU AssembUe ? 2. Whither, in one kirk in one kingdom, at one tym, there might be two GeneraU AssembUes ? 3. Whither is it not requyred, that at sic pubhct AssembUes, there be sum Commis sioners at the least out * of every diocese in the kingdome ? 4. What number of brethrein, at the fewest, is requisit to make sic ane AssembUe ? 5. Whither any coming there without commission may be accepted in the number of the assembled brethrein ? 6. Whither hes it bein ane usuaU form in the Assembhes, that the Moderatour of the preceiding Assembhe, efter a sermon maid be * Gibson's MS. " one." ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 411 him, did then give over the chairge ; untUl quhilk tym he ever con tinued Moderatour, and if sicknes impedit him, he then dischairged himselff therof be wrytt ? 7. Whither does not Mr John Forbes continue Moderatour, and must he not dishairge himselff therof at their nixt meitting ; and if so be, upon quhat reason did they pro- ceid, without the presence of the Moderatour of the last preceiding AssembUe ? 8. If he was absent without lawfuU excusse, quhairfor did they not censure him ? 9. If there had bein, in sum uther pairt of the countrey, the number of als many ministers, at that sam tyme, quhilk of the meittings sould have been compted the GeneraU AssembUe ? 10. Whither may the place of meitting appoynted in the former AssembUe be altered, and be whose direction? 11. For quhat cause was Lawrestoun, being the King's Commissioner, removed at their consultation ; who, be his office, sould at aU tymes ever have bein present at aU their proceidings, and without whose presence there could be no lawfuU AssembUe ? 12. Why were they not removed that were upon the lytes to be Moderatour ; quhilk was ane usuaU and lawfuU forme, ever heirtofor in sic caices? 13. Whidder ane Assemblie may be haulden without ane lawfuU Clark admitted, or, in caice of his sicknes, ,or just caus of his absence, by bis substituts ? 14. Whither may a Clark, admitted dureing his Ufe, be dispossessed be ane new AssembUe, without sufficient cause of deprivation, and sufficient cognition? 15. Whither may a Clark serve in that office before he give his oath ? 16. Whither did their new Clark give any oath ? Who was Clark to the giving of it ? Or quhat record was maid of it ? 17. Whither doe they think that the presence of two persons only for aU the bounds lying be-south Forth, containing thretteine shires, besydes stewartries and baUzeries, and being aUmost the half of the whoU kingdome, was sufficient eneughe to mak a fuU AssembUe ? 18. Whither may a new AssembUe, conveined be his Majestie's warrand, and the lawfuU and ordinarie Clark, disprove and con- demne all their proceidings at Aberdeine." The nixt day, efter the chairg and delyverie of the saids Ques tions, being the Lord's day, Mr Peter Hewet, minister at Edin- 412 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE brough, and James Primrose, scryb to the Secreit CounseU, went to Blaknes in commission from the Lord President to the ministers there, promeissing them a dischairge of their appearing at Perth befor the Counsell, if they would mak a favourable declaration of their proceidings in their Assemblie, and give discreit answers to the interrogatours, so as his Majestie must be satissfied and con tented ; unto whom the answer foUowing was delyvered in wrytt, to be given to the President, upon condition, that if it wer ac cepted, an answer with the promeissed dischairge, sould be at them the nixt day, before the sun rysing : if it wer refuissed, that aU wayes their wrytt sould be returned to them again at the said tyme, and not be prejudiciaU to the answers quhilk it sould pleas the Lord to make them give at Perth : — " Please your Lordship, we are most willing to satisfie your Lordship's desyre,' both touching the declaration of our proceidings in the last AssembUe, the grounds that moved us therto, and our purpose therin, and aUso touching sic answers as we sould give to the interrogations at greatter length then this tyme could suffer, or the dewtie that we ought to God in his worship this day could permitt. As to the first, this is the trueth, in the sight of God, that parthe our dewtie to God, according to his Word, in our caUing ; pairtUe our dewtie to his Kirk, in procuiring the weUlfair therof according therto, in the lawfuU use of the Uberties therof, quhilk her Lord hes granted her, quhairof her frie meitings is ane of the chieff; pairtUe the conscience of that Covenant quhilk we have sworne and subscryved, binding us to a constant continu ance in obedience and maintenance, both of the doctrine and disci pline of this Kirk, according to our caUing ; and lastlie, that obedience quhUk we ought to our brethrein, who gave us commis sion to keep the said Assemblie, according to the appoyntment and direction of the letter send from Perth be the Laird of Law restoun and the Commissioners of the GeneraU AssembUe, were the grounds that moved us to goe and keep that Assembhe ; quhUk Assembhe, and the keiping therof, as we are throughlie resolved, are sufficientlie approved and warranted be his Majestie's lawes. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 413 This is the trueth, in our conscience, of the grounds of our meit ting. As for the motives, we protest, in the presence of God, there was neither thoght nor purpose in us to offend his Majestie, let be to utter any contempt of his Hienes authoritie, bot the fear of a more then evident irruption upon the lawfuU Uberties of God's Kirk, and estabUshed order thereof according to God's Word, be some of our brethrein intending to estabhshe of new that abomi nable hierarchie of the Romish Antichrist, long since confuted by the Word of God, abohshed be the lawes, and abjured in our for said covenant. What we did in this meitting, the proces aUreadie produced to your Lordship wUl sufficientUe declair, quhairin we forced the Laud of Lawrestoun to nothing bot that quhilk he did of [his] own accord. " As to the Questions, sic of them as are generaU, concerning the haUl bodie, we think it belongs to the haiU Kirk, to wit, ane EwfuU GeneraU AssembUe, to defyne and resolve them, (and not to us who are particular members therof, being now cited as rei) ; unto the quhilk we have bein, and stUl are readie to submitt our selves, and our haul proceidings, to be judged according to the Word of God. As for sic of them as concerns our particular fact, . as namehe, the 7th, 8th, 11th, 12th, 16th, 18th ; this is our mynd. [As] to the 7th, Mr John Forbes was Moderatour of the last As sembhe, and so continewes. It were meitt he sould teach at the nixt, although it be not absolutlie necessar. As to the 8th, Answers, He was not censured, becaus he was absent, and becaus the Assemblie continued [delayed] aU things at the CounseU's desyre. As to the 11th, He removed himselff wUUngUe, and of his own accord, the door being continuaUie patent, and nothing done quhairin his consent was not first craived. As to the 12th, It is ane indifferent thing, and hes bein indifferentlie used befor, and at this tyme specialhe, becaus the brethrein resolved to make choyse of him whom Lawrestoun had named to be mouth. As to the 16th, He was a minister who had given his oath of fideUitie to the Kirk, at his entrie, in aU things that pertained to the weiU therof. As for the 18th, It is answered befor, that we 414 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE are willing to submit ourselves, in our proceidings at that Assem blie, to the judgment of a lawfuU GeneraU Assemblie, accord ing to God's Word." The Ministers, perceiving the drift of these questions, did pur- poselie eschew the answering of the generaUs, and did so spairing- lie meU with the particulars, that they might disappoynt the pur- posse of sic as earnestlie * intendit to bring them in controversie with his Majestie, m these same things, quhilk they did greatlie t practeiss to the hurt of the Kirk. Answer was not returned according to promeiss. The nixt day, therfor, the sex Prissoners wer convoyed be the guard to Perth the 26th of August. The 27th the CounseU sat, efter the sermon had be Mr WiUiam Cowper, in great evidence of the Spirit, against the corruption intendit in the Kirk, and present trouble of the servants of Christ. The Ministers being caUed severaUie compeired ; first, Mr John Forbes, desyring that, in that matter quhilk was alyke pertinent to them aU, they might be suffered joyntly to give their answers. QuhUk being denyed, efter many reasons why he could not be haulden to answer after that maner that he was sought, to sic interrogatours concerning the estaite of the haul Kirk, and offer ing to give his judgment and privat oppinion extra judicium, for Christian resolution, to any who, in a Christian maner, sould re- quyre the same ; it being still urged be the President, to answer as he was requyred, in respect it was his Majestie's wiU, he did give in, in wrytt, the answers foUowing, deyysed and penned befor by the Brethren for that purpose, fearing that they sould be compeUed to give some answer, or then be given out as despyssers of his Majes tie's wUl and command : — " These Interrogatours are of two sorts ; sum are theatick or generaU, and sum are hypothetick, concerning our own particular fact ; bot unto neither of them ar we haulden to answer at this tyme and in this place for the reassons following : — " 1. Becaus we understand there is no law binding us to doe so. * Gibson's MS. " craftilie." f Ibid. " quietly." ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 415 "2. It is contrair to a protestation maid be the Kirk at Perth, in the GeneraU AssembUe haulden the 4th of Mairch, 1596 ; quhilk. protestation was admitted be his Majestie, as the Register of our AssembUe beares, quhairin it was specialhe provydet, That matters proponed sould be reassoned, votted and concluded, according to the Word of God and good conscience, in the ordinarie place of the AssembUe. " 3. Becaus it is agreed upon in the decision of his Majestie's Questions proponed at the same Assemblie, that doubts sould be pro poned decenter, at right tym and place, animo cedificandi, non ten- tandi ; quhilk act we craive to be keiped. " 4. Questions concerning the generaU Kirk sould not be answered be particulair persons, haveing no lawfuU calUng from the gerjeraU Kirk therto, leist they sould erre and prejudge the Ubertie given be Christ to his Kirk ; and sum of them are aUreadie decydit be the Acts of the GeneraU AssembUe. " 5. AUbeit they wer proponed, as said is, and we had a caUing to answer, we have not had sufficient spaice nor occasion of meanes, to be sufficiently advysed and resolved in matters of sic weight. " 6. We are readie, and here we offer, as members of the bodie, conjunctlie in ane GeneraU AssembUe, to give answer to aU thir questions, and submitts ourselves and our haUl proceidings in our last AssembUe to be judged therby, according to the Word of God and constitutions of the Kirk. "7. As to the particuUar and hypothetick interrogatours, the tym hes not suffered us to answer them presenthe ; bot we saU doe it with aU expedition, in the full declaration of our haul proceidings at our Assemblie, quhairby, not only hoipping, bot we are most assured, that we sail sufficientUe content his Majestie against aU the slanders quhairwith we are burdened." Thir answers being red, the CounseU urged Mr John to give direct answers, in particular, to every question ; bot he refuissed to answer farther nor he had given in be wrytt. Quhairupon, [he] being removed, the rest of the ministers wer severaUie caUed, and requyred to answer severaUie to every interrogatour ; bot they aU 416 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE adhered to the common answers given in iu wrytt be Mr John Forbes. The CounseU caUing for the guard to convoy the ministers back to their waird, they desyred first to be heard, and, behag admitted, they humbllie besought the Lords that they would no longer punish their bodies by imprissonment, they being persons frie be the Ew, and unconvict in any cryme or offence ; bot if they had any thing to lay to their chairge, quhairof their Lordships might be judges according to the law, that they would either, by speedie tryeU, end their troubUe, or then suffer them to repair to their chairges, upon sufficient suretie, sic as their Lordships pleassed to devyse, to have them answerable to the lawes, quhat tym they sould be requyred upon lawful premonition. This their suit was rejected, and they delyvered to the guard, to be convoyed the nixt day to Blaknes. Heirupon they essayed, if they might procuir that favour as to have libertie for fyfteen dayes, to provyde things necessarie for their waird, in respect sum of them had bein taken upon the sudden, without wairning or premonition, and by [beyond] aU ex pectation were committed, haveing maid no provision, sum being more then fourscoir of myUes from their dwellings. This request being allso refuised, they dealt, lasthe, that they might be permitted for the space of four or fy ve dayes only, to ease and refreshe their weak bodies, the seikly disposition quhairof long unprissonment greathe augmented. Bot aU favour and courtesie being denyed, they wer sent to waird, and entred in Blaknes the 29th of August. Bot befor their depairture out of Perth, Mr John Forbes dealt with the Pre sident, that they might have ane licence granted to sic ane one as they would send to his Majestie, with the trew Declaration of their proceidings, for making their innocencie knowen to his Hienes. The President answered, That he was to goe himselff in person, therfor they sould neid no Ucence to any ; for if they lyked, he would carry ought they would send, faithfuUie delyver it, and report ane answer back againe. This did he, becaus they had re solved to closse up all wayes, that nothing sould come to his Ma- ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 417 jestie's eares touchinge the saids ministers proceidings bot be the Counsell's report. At this CounseU, besyds the Lords, wer pre sent, joyned with them, of the lait Commissioners of the GeneraU Assemblie, Mr Andrew Lamb, Mr James Law, Mr Alexander Linday, Mr Alexander Douglas ; of whom Mr Alexander Douglas, then Bischope of Murray, with the uther Bischops, to wit, Mr John Spottiswood of Glasgow, Mr Gawen HamUtoun of GaUoway, and Mr Andrew Knox of the Isles, and with them, Mr Alexander Lyndsay, (no Bisohope, bot ane of the Bischoprie commissioners,) Mr Patrick GaUoway, Mr John HaU, and Mr Robert Pont, aU of that same sort, went up to Court at that same tyme quhen my Lord President went up. CAP. III. THE DECLARATION OF THE MINISTERS PROCEIDINGS, FOR CLEARING OF THEIR OWN INNOCENCIE, AND APPEASING OF HIS MAJESTIE'S WRAITH, SENT BY THEM TO HIS MAJESTIE. The Ministers, efter their re-entering in prissone, finding that his Majestie's mynd was alhenated from them, and his Hienes greatlie offended at their proceidings, pairthe by the misreport and fals narration maid be the Laird of Lawrestoun, strengthened be the Counsell, and pairtUe be the uncharitable misconstructing speaches of the lait Commissioners and new created Bischops uttered against them and their proceidings, to the great prejudice, both of their cause and their persons : Therfor, for appeassing of his Majestie's wraith, and induceing of his Hienes to the favour able consideration of their innocencie, and pittieing of their per sons so long imprissoned without any just cause, [they] thought good to clear themselffes and their doings of the many unjust eclanders and callumnies quhairwith they were heavUUe burdened and traduced, by penning the trew Declaration of their haul pro ceidings in their AssembUe at Aberdein, with ane humble suppli cation to his Majestie for their delyverie, and for free use of the 2d 418 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE lawfull libertie of their AssembUes given be Christ to his Kirk ; purposlie eschewing the direct answering of his Majestie's letter of declaration sent with the questions, becaus it was not sent to them be the CounseU, and becaus they thoght it not meit to depairt from their own particular, to the pleading for the generaU, so established be law, custom, and practeiss, and so sufficientlie warranting their deid in particular, as grounded therupon, and agrieable therunto ; neither would they, swa far as they might, involve themselffes hi unnecessarie questions and debait with his Majestie, to minister occasion by untymous and unnecessar con tention to his Hienes, to obtame that advantage agauist their per sons, quhilk, as yet, their own deid could not minister ; and for obtaining quhairof the saids Questions wer purposlie devysed; it being a thing resolved, That the ministers behoved either by just desert, or then by some shadow and coUour of apparant justice, to be brought within the compas of ane law ;* becaus it was concluded as a thing most necessar for the peaceable perfornung of the for said wicked purpose, touching the government of the Kirk, to put sum of them out of the way, speciaUie Mr John Forbes, and Mr John Welsh, of whom there was no hoip that ever they sould be moved to condiscend, or, in sUence, to toUerat such iniquitie. For this forsaid cause, immediathe efter then? returning to Blaknes they penned the Declaration foUowing, and sent it to the President, who presented it to his Majestie : — " To the most Meightie, Heigh, and ExceUent Monarch, our Gracious and Dread Soveraigne James, be the Grace of God, King of Great Brittane, France, andlrland, Defendar of the Faith &c, grace, mercie, and peace from God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, be multiphed. " Pleas your Most Excellent Majestie to vouchsaife a gratious ear to us in declairing the trew," &c. * What follows from this to the end of {he sentence is deleted in Swinton's MS. In Gibson's it stands without any marks of deletion. estate of the kirk. 419 [For this Declaration, see Calderwood's History of the Kirk of Scotland, vol. vi. pp. 322-332.] ,Upon the 4th of September the Synod of Fife being conveined, after long dehberation touching the keeping of the General Assem blie, appointed to be at Aberdene the last Tuesday of September then instant, which by open proclamation was forbidden, at length resolved to send their advice to aU the Presbyteries of the land, for prolonging the diet of the General Assemblie to the first Tuesday of May 1606, for eschewing aU occasion of offence, and speciaUy the appearance of rash and 'hastie proceeding, in reguard of the foresaid proclamation to the contraries tUl his Highnes were sufficientlie informed of the truth of aU maters, contrarie to the false report, wherupon the aaid prooEmation had proceeded ; ordain ing in the meane time the Presbyteries -of their shires, if any other better advise louching the keeping of the AssembUe should be sent from the rest of the Presbyteries by their Commissioners, to embrace and foUow the same, so farre as might stand with the honor of God, the Uberties of the Church, and the lawes of the land : Which advice being with diligence communicated, as it is said, the continuation was unbraced by all, aud the day by some ; wherupon the meeting of the AssembUe appointed to be at Aberdene the last of September foresaid, was made to be of no effect. * CAP. IV. THE POLLICIE OF THE COUNSELL TO COVER THEIR WRONG AND IMPRISSONMENT OF THE REMANENT MINISTERS. In the mean tyme, whUe this matter is in consultation at London, the conclusion quhairof we saU heirafter hear, the most pairt of the remanent Bretihrein of the ministrie, who had been at Aberdein, * In Swinton's MS. this paragraph is wanting, and in its place there is a part of a paragraph, which, in Gibson's MS., is to be found in the beginning of Chap. V., and ¦which, following the latter MS., we have transposed to that Chapter. 2d2 420 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE aither present at the Assemblie or at the approbation therof, being chairged to appeare befor the CounseU the 12 th of Septem ber, wer continued, to appear the thrid of October at Perth. Mr Hendrie Blythe was continued still in waird, aUbeit ane warrand was procuired, 22d September, from his Majestie for his relieff ; becaus he and his flock refussed the condition craived of them, quhilk was, that the BaiUies and CounseU of the Canongait sould be bound under the paine of two thowsand merks for Mr Hendrie, that in his sermons he sould not mell with the CounseU their pro ceidings, or ony matter of estaite. Ane letter allso was send abroad to aU Presbitries from the ChaunceUour and Secretar, bearing great show of zeaU and good affection to the trueth, and of fordward cair in them, and readines, by justice, to suppres the enemies therof; quhilk they did to miti- gat the mynds of aU men, not a little commoved at their rigorous and seveir proceedings against the Ministers, without just cause, and to prevent the dangerous inconvenients quhilk they feared therupon to aryse. The Letter was as foUowes : — " Efter our very heartiUie commendations : Quhairas his Majes tie is credibUie informed that the order taken, be his Majestie's commandement, with the few number of those of the ministrie that, contrair to his Majestie's warrand, chairg and desyr of the Coun seU, attempted to hauld ane AssembUe no wayes aUowed be the most and best of the Church of Scotland, hes bred sum disquyet- nes in the mynds of the peoplle, hes armed som of the insolent sort to despyse and misregaird the ministers, and has imboldened the Papists to expect impunitie, as if his exceUent Majestie and his Officers of State sould be so bussied with repressing the enor mities and unrewhe accidents that have flowed from the last disobe dience, that their liberties sould be encreassed, and the executing of the lawes against them sould so cease ; it has, therfor, pleassed our gracious Soverane, out of the tender cair that his Majestie hes of the maintenance of that undoubted trueth quhilk his Majestie, hes ever professed, and for preventing of these inconvenients that ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 421 of the present jars may aryse, to command us, be these presents, to signifie to aU the particular Presbitries within this kingdom, that aUbeit this Uttle handfuU of discontented spirits has done quhat in them lay to animat his Majestie against the haiU estait of the Church, that such is his fatherhe love to have the sinceritie of rehgion established for him and his posteritie to the world's end, to have the preachours honoured and regairded in their caUing, to have the enemies rooted out and trodden under foot, and the lawes execut with aU rigour against them ; that it is his Majestie's gra- tious pleasour that, as in love he wUl have the factious brethrein to be corrected, to the terrour of such who may be induced in the lyk errour, and contentment of the best of the ministrie, who feares the dangerous events that such enormities may produce, so, in justice he wUl have none of his subjects in no degrie * to escaipe their dew punishment, that do presume, in word or deid, to offend, despyse or contemne any of that profession, meikle less that any of ane opposit reUgion saU expect any impunitie ; bot upon the decla ration of the minister, or any uther subject quhatsoever, saU be caUed and punished in all severitie. According to the quhilk his Majestie's gracious and princehe commandement, we have thoght good, be these presents, to signifie unto you his Majestie's royaU pleasour and our most wUUng disposition, in every poynt, by our best endeavours to accompUshe the same ; heirby earnesthe request ing you, that if any subject saU presume to offer any injurie or wrong to any minister within your bounds, or if any Papist, Jesuit, or Seminarie Priest, or excommunicat person, saU publictlie or privatlie have any resett, supphe or maintenance, or favours within your said bounds, that ze immediathe declair the same to us, or to his Majestie's Advocats, or to their deputs, under sufficient information be verification, quhairupon proces may be deduced; efter the quhUk ye saU not faiU to sie the lawes put in execution against them, without any spairing, as we saU answer to his Ma jestie on our highest perrill. Thus not doubting of your charitably judgment of aU his Majestie's most just and religious proceidings, * Gibson's MS. " of any degrees." 422 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE foundit upon the remembrance of his deaUing when he was with you, and of our zealous prosecuting of aU kynd of contempt that may steinzie * the puritie of your profession, and of your affauld concurs f with us iu aU things quhUk may tend to the peace of the Kirk. " From Perth the 27th of August 1605. (Sic subscribitur) " Alexander Cancellarius, Secretarie" What sinceritie was in their hearts the Lord kicontinent mani fested, be occasion quhilk fell out at that sam tyme hi the oppres sion [apprehension ?] of Mr GUbert Broun, sumtyme Abbot of New Abbey, ane excommunicat Seimnarie Priest, (with whom what course the CounseU did tak wUl heirefter be manifested) ; anent whom his Majestie had caused mak proclamation, offering great gratituds and immunities to any who sould apprehend him and present him to justice, becaus he was ane knowen notorious idol- later and seducer of uthers therto ; who now being apprehendit be the Laird of Cranstoun, accompanied with some of the guard, was committed be the CounseU to Blaknes, the 1st of October, bot again transported to Edmbroughe CasteU the thrid of October, quhair he was entertained upon his Majestie's chairges ; unto whom the Ministers in Blaknes haveing offered conference whUl he was there, and haveing entered therin with him, it ceased upon his refuisall to answer some things proponed be them, quhair with he fand himselff stf aited, quhilk was thought to have bein the cause quhairfore he was removed from them to ane uther waird. t Upon the said thrid of October, the CounseU being convened at * Stain. t Honest or upright concurring. I " Advyse, if ye think good to put in heir, and make mention of the proclamation maid anent Mr John Hamilton. Thogh it was efter this tym, yet it is of this sort ; for it seemed they would have had him taken to have suffered sic punishment as the uthers did." (Author's note on margin of Swinton's MS. There is a line drawn across as a mark of deletion. The note does not occur in Gibson's MS.) ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 423 Perth, the Ministers, continued from the 12th of September to that day, wer caUed, [and appeared, namelie, from the North, Mr John Munroe, Mr Charles Ferme, Mr James Irving, Mr WUUam Forbes, Mr Robert Johnstoun [Youngson], Mr WUliam Davidsone, Mr David Robertsone, Mr Archibald Blackbume, Mr James Rose, Mr Alexander Scrogie, Mr Robert Reid ; from Dunkelden, John Rose ; from the West, Mr Nathan EngUsh, Mr James Gregge ; and from the South, Mr Thomas Abemethie ; *] of whom the first two or thrie examined haveing given frie and pEine testimonie in ap probation of the AssembUe at Aberdein? f they and aU the rest wer continued tUl efternoon, at the desyr of Mr David Lyndsay, then Bischop of Rosse, who hoped certainUe to induce them aU to ane disaUowing of the said AssembUe as unlawful ; who, to this effect conveining with them, affirmed that there was ane Act of Parlia ment inhibiting expressUe all Assemblies, except sic as had his Majestie's, or else his Commissioner's, speciaU consent unto them. QuhUk act the Ministers eamestUe desyring to know, the book being brought, they kuist up the first Act of the 12th ParUament, 1592, craiving, E that was the act quhairby he meaned ? quhUk being red, and by his confession found to favour them against him, he affirmed there was ane uther posteriour act quhairof he did speak ; quhilk being long searched and not found in the book, Mr David did send the booke to my Lord Advocate sitting in Coun seU, and desyred him to find out the Act inhibiting AssembUes without his Majestie's consent, and to mark it and send ft to him, who sent him back againe the said first Act of the 12th ParUament, 1592. Quhairupon, finding no ground in the law to controU their Assemblie, he desisted from reasoning, and pressed by aUuring perswasion to induce them to that, unto the quhilk he could find no sufficient reason to perswad them ; quhairby he so prevaUled, that in end aU being brought severaUie befor the Counsell, parthe by infirmitie and partUe by craftie aUurements, a few being moved * From Gibson's MS. t What follows from this to line 3d from foot, ending with these words, " no suffi cient reason to perswad them," is deleted by cross lines in Swinton's MS. In Gibson's MS. it stands without any marks of deletion. 424 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE to doubt of the lawfuUnes of that Assembhe, were relaxed from the home and sent home to their chairges ; * bot how trewhe it is aUedged in the forsaid book, (pages 14 and 15,) that they maid protestation of their great sorrow for their offence, and excuissed themselves upon their ignorance, and besought the Lords to be mediatours at his Majestie's hands for a pardon to them, we leave it to the saids brethren's own Declaration ; being fuUie assured by some of themselffes that they are about to mak it manifest, how far they ever were from any such thing, and that the said report is a most impudent callumney. Other sevein remaining constant in the approbation of the said AssembUe, yet so as they sub mitted the judgment therof to the GeneraU AssembUe, wer com mitted, to wit, Mr Charles Ferme and Mr John Munro to the CasteU of Downe ; Mr James Irwing and Mr WUUam Forbes to the Castell of Stirling ; Mr Nathaneel EigUes and Mr James Greig to the Castell of Dumbartoun ; [LE John Rose and Mr Thomas Abernethie to Invemes. After which decree the said Mr Thomas, somewhat fainting, entered before the Councell and forsooke his former opinion ; whereupon he likewise was sent home againe : the rest entered into their prisons ; onhe Mr John Rose obtained to have his prison changed to Stirling.f] Besyds these foresaid there were uther four, Mr David Raith, Mr John Young, Mr Abraham Henderson, Mr NathaneeU Harlow, who, in the providence of God, wer spaired, and past on unsummond; and Mr Archibald Sympson, who, being summond, and compeiring befor the Coun seU, was remitted home againe by the instant deaUing of the Earlle of Mortoun, who, being one of his flocke, was not content that his pastour sould be put in prison for sic a cause. The sam thrid of October, two supplications being given in to the CounseU in favours of the sex Ministers in Blaknes, the one * In Gibson's MS. it is : " Whereby he prevailed so farre that Mr Archibald Black- burne, Mr James Rose, Mr Robert Reid, Mr Robert [Youngson], Mr David Robertson, Mr William Davidsone, and Mr Alexander Scrogie, were moved before the Councell in the afternoone, through infirmitie, to confesse the said Assemblie to be unlawfuU, and so were sent home and released from all danger." t From Gibson's MS. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 425 sent from themselves, requesting that aither they might be put to ane tryall of the lawes, or then put to libertie upon suertie, to be answerable upon lawfull premonition ; the other given in be the ministers of Fyfe, desyring that their brethrein might be releived upon caution, or then wairdit within their own congregations; quhilk both wer refuissed to be red, let be to be answered. Sic was the CounseU's clemencie and favourable proceidings with these servants of God, according to justice; and in place of answer to their humble suit, ane ordinance was direct from the CounseU to the Constable of Blaknes, commanding him to separate them, two and two, in severaU chalmers, to stay them from meiting among them selves, and to suffer no other to have accesse to them. CAP. V. THE CONCLUSION TAKEN AT LONDOUN, AND EXECUTION THEROF ON THE COUNSELL'S PAIRT, LN THE PROCES LED AGAINST THE MINISTERS, THE 24TH OF OCTOBER, AT EDINBURGH. Bot now to returne againe to the proceidings at Court, and things foUowing thereon, the King, having redde and considered the Declaration sent by the ministers with the Lord President, was somewhat moved against the Laird of Laurestoun, both for the evident appearance of the falshood of the aUeadged charge, and because he had informed his Majestie that he had been in his persone contemned and abused ; who therfore being caUed before his Majestie and accused hereof, for his owne safetie feU downe on his knees, beseeching his Majestie not to give credit to the report of the Ministers, by many oathes affirming that it was true that he had said, and that they had written contrarie to the truth. Thus, by a new and impudent falshood, he was driven to defend and cover his former, lest he should incurre his Majestie's wrath. In this debate of his Majestie's mind, which way to incline the sway of his affection and desire, being nothing weakened, but rather strengthened by such as were present ; specialUe the President, (as 426 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE by the subsequent events wUl appeare,) carryed his Hienes to credit Laureatoun, because he would have it so, and it behoved to be so, for effecting his purpose as he reported,* Afterwards the President and Bishops having composed their dehait,t for the aUedged hinder maid by the ChaunceUor and Pre sident to the estabhshing of the Estait of Bischops ; his Majestie haveing taken promeiss of the President, in name of the CounseU,, that in tymes coming they sould concure and imploy themselffes in fordering the forsaid erection of Bischops, and also the Bischops and Commissioners, being by his Majestie agreed m aU their parti- cuUar debates, speciaUie the contention for pre-eminencie of autho ritie, they aU joyned together in one against thefr Brethrein in prisson, and did resolve and conclude anent them as foUows : — First, It was ordained that the CounseU sould caU them, and by their sentence convict them. Secondlie, That the Commissioners of the Generall AssembUe sould doe the hke. Therefter, that sic of them as sould give some token of repentance, by acknowledging of their offence, sould be relieved from prisson and wairded within their own congregations. Concerning them who would not ac knowledge their offence, it was divershe resolved. Mr John Forbes and Mr John Welsh, (of whose repentance for that deid there was no hoipe,) were ordained to be banished. The rest who sould remaine obstinat, wer appoynted to be deposed from their ministrie be, the Commissioners of the GeneraU AssembUe. This yas the favour quhilk the goeing of these Bischops and usurping Commissioners to Court with my Lord President did procuir to their brethrein in affliction, as in ane letter from Londoun be ane pf the Bischops to his own Presbytrie, touching their proceidings at that tyme, is contained at more lenth ; quhairby it may easUie appear, that in aU this matter his Majestie did nothing bot that quhairunto his Hienes was counseUed and. entyssed, parthe be these Counsellors, bot specialhe be the Bischops and Commission- * This paragraph, from the words "the King,"&c, in line 2d, forms the concluding part of Chapter HI. in Swinton's MS., but in Gibson's is introduced here, as stated at p. '09. , t Gibson's MS. " being reconciled together." ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 427 X ers, who, to this effect, did alwayes provyde that one or two of their number sould continuaUie be at Court, for resaivuig advertis- mgnt, and deaUing with his Majestie according therto, that their purpose might prosper. Quhat hitherto hes beine declaired, touching the CounseU and Commissioners proceichngs against these Ministers, is aU supressed and subtiUie conceaUed in the book of u Declaration" sett foorth by the CounseU, of purpose to make the ministers odious, and their cause ungracious, to aU such to whose eares no mformation sould cum of thefr proceiduigs, bot sic as the said buik sould afford. About the 6th of October, the President returned from Court ; which being knowne to the ministers hnprisoned in Blaknes, they sent to him, desiring to know how the King had received their petition, and how he was satisfied with the Declaration of their proceedings, and what effect his Honor's promised traveU had taken in their favour. He answered, That the King thought greater offence to be given by their Apologie, then by their first contempt ; and that he had given order to summond them, and the rest of their brethren imprisoned in other parts, to the 24th of October next, to heare and see their AssembUe declared unlawfuU. * The Counsell, for performing on their pafrt the conclusion taken at Londoun, did, upon the 14th of October, chairge the ministers in waird to appear befor them upon the 24th day thereof, to hear and see their AssembUe descerned unlawfuU, and themselffes to be punished therfor ; and, in the meantyme, did pubhshe ane procla mation direct from his Majestie, purging his Majestie of aU inten tion to make any sudden alteration of the present estait of the Kirk ; and for the declaration of his Majestie's upright meaning heirin, appoynting ane Generall AssembUe to be haulden at Dun die, the last Twysday of Juhj, in the quhilk AssembUe his Majestie expected reparation of these aledged disorders of the wairdit ministers, in so far as belonged to the censure of the said Assemblie, and to have his Hienes freed in aU tyme coming, from * The preceding part of this paragraph is from Gibson's MS. In Swinton's it has only these words to represent it, " The President being returned from Court." 428 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE all such caUumnies as was aUedged, uttered, touching his Majes tie's intention anent the alteration of the estaite of the Kirk among them. Thus was his Majestie induced, by these men's advyse, for promoveing their purpose, to use more poUicie then prudence, hazarding his Hienes own reputation for pleasouring of them in their course, as efterwards wUl appear in the successe, quhilk uttered and manifested their polUcie in this proceiding, practeissed more for covering the secreit intention quhilk was in hand, then for comforting the good by a solide purpose of per forming the thing promeissed. Bot to returne to the Ministers, they being summond, conveined in Edinbrough, the twentie-thrid of October, and there haveing weiyed and considered the tennour, substance, and nature of the- lybeU, quhairof they wer to be accuissed, resolved, be advyse of uthers their brethrein, (quhairof a nobUeman from diverse pairts of the kingdom wer corned there,) to use aU means, without offence, to procuire the remitting of that matter and themselffes to the judgment and censour of the GeneraU AssembUe, as only com petent judges in sic a cause. Upon the nixt day being caUed, the Summonds was red, the tennour quhairof foUows : — " James be the grace of God," &c. [See the Summonds in Calderwood's History, vol. vi. p. 342.] With the foresaid Summonds there came two warrands from the CounceU to the Constable of Blaknes, the one to release the im prisoned ministers on Tuesday the 22d of October, that they might keepe the day appointed in the Summonds before the CounceU ; the other commanding him to separate them, two by two, in severaU roomes, to hinder them from meeting together, and to suffer none to have accesse unto them ; which last warrand, though directed from the CounceU at Perth, the 3d of October, yet, through the mercifull providence of God, was delayed to that day. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 429 Upon Tuesday, the 22d of October, according to the other war rand, the Ministers being set at libertie went to Edinburgh, where they continued advising with God and their brethren, upon that which should be most fit and expedient, for the glory of God and good of his Church, to be done by them, in answering to the said Summonds upon the nixt Thursday foUowing. Upon which day the ministers being called all together, * the Summonds were red, and his Majestie's Advocat, in his Majestie's name, persewed that action against the ministers, who wer desyred by the ChanceUor to answer be one or two of their own number for the rest. Quhairupon, finding that no Proeuratour would be admitted to speak for them, considdering the great inconvenience that would ensew to the Kirk of God, and what hurt to the kingdome of Christ, and the lawfuU liberties of the Church according to his Word, ratified also, and confirmed by the laws of the land and Actes of ParUament, if in matters of -their calling they sould acknowledge the CounseU judges competent ; for eschewing the said inconvenience, yet, so as if it were possible no offence were taken thereby, they did give in to the CounseU the Supplication foUowing. [See this Supplication in Calderwood's History, vol. vi. p. 345.] The Supplication being red, it was desyred be the Advocat, that the ministers sould be caussed answer to the lybeU, and their Sup phcation continued tUl their answers sould be heard to the matter quhafrfor they wer summonded ; [and being propounded by the Lords to the ministers, they besought their Honours, before they were forced to answere, to heare their petition, since that thereby it might be that they should find sufficient reason why they ought not to be urged with further answer. Whereupon, the Clerk, being about to reade it, the Lord ChanceUor stayed him, and caused deUver it back to be redde by some of themselves, and * The preceding paragraph and this paragraph, to this place, are not in Swinton's MS. 430 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE having bene redde by Mr John Forbes, whom it pleased the brethren to desire to speake in their name, it was demanded by the Lord Advocat, Whether the said petition was given in as an answer to the UbeU, or as a sute to the Lordes ; whereunto*] the ministers affirmed, that they had given in that Supphcation as the first pairt of their answers to the said libel; quhilk being weUl considered by their Lordships, they hoipped that they sould be troubUed with no farder processe befor their Lordships, and, ther for, desyred their Lordships mterloquitor theron. The Advocat, perceiving that it tendit aUtogether to the setting off the Lords as not competent judges in that matter, aUedged, That there was ane law, quhairby the Lords of CounseU wer constitut judges over aU persons in aU matters, both spirituaU and temporaU, in respect quhairof the suppUcation ought not to be admitted ; and for veri- fieing his aUedgance, produced the first Act of the eight Parlia ment, halden at Edinbrough the 22d of Maij 1584, in the quhUk it is statute, " That his Hienes, his afres and successors, be them- BehTes and their CounseUs, saU be judges competent to aU persons his Hienes subjects, spirituaU or temporaU, in aU matters quhairin they saU be apprehendit, summond or chairged, to answer to sic things as saUbe enquyred of them be his Majestie and his Coun seU ; and that none of them who shah happen to be apprehendit, caUed or summond, to the effect forsaid, presume, or tak upon hand to declyne the judgment of his Hienes, his aires and successors, or their CounseU in the premisses, under the paine of treasson." To this the Ministers answered, That quhatsoever law was maid in that Parliament, or any uther preceidmg the zeir of God 1592, in prejudice of the trew Kirk and lawfuU liberties therof, could have no strength at that tym against them, in respect of the first act of the 12th ParUament halden at Edinbrough the first day of Junij the said 1592, aU Acts of ParUament, lawes and statuts, maid at any tym befor the day and dait therof, against the Uberties of the trew Kirk, jurisdiction and discipUne thereof, as the sam is used and exerceissed within the realme, are abrogate, cassed and * From Gibson's MS. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 431 annulled, and the Kirk restored to aU her privUedges, Uberties, immunities and freedomes quhatsoever, given and granted to her befor be any [of] his Hienes predecessours, his Regents, or his Hienes selff", and to the frie use of her Assemblies, GeneraU, SynodaU, Presbitries, and Sessions, with the haill jurisdiction and discipUne of the Kirk ; quhUks both Assemblies, and discipUne and jurisdiction, are declaired and decerned to be in aU tymes coming most just, good and godUe in the selff, notwithstanding of quhat- sumever statutes, acts, canon, civUl or municipaU lawes maid in the Contrair; to the quhilks aU and everie ane, that forsaid act makes expresse derogation : And farder anent the said act aUedged and produced be the Advocat, maid the yeir 1584, it is particular- he declaired, That it.saUno wayes be prejudiciaU nor derogat any thing to the privUedge that God hes given to the spirituaU office bearers in the Kirk, &c. ; and therfor their Supplication sould be admitted, notwithstanding of the said act 1584. ;[They] therfor desyred the Lords to read and consider the said act, and to give their interloquitor theron. The act being red, the nunisters wer commanded to remove. At that very instant Mr Robert Yewingstoun [Youngson], (one of these ministers who at Perth the thrid of October bemg induced to doubt of the lawfuUnes of the AssembUe at Aberdeine,* was remitted home) presented hunselff befor the Lords, desyring to be heard ; and his brethrein stayed tUl he sould speak ; quhilk being permitted, he protested, in their presence, and plainhe professed, " That, hi his conscience he was fuUie resolved, and so could not bot acknowledge the AssembUe at Aberdein to be lawfuU, confessing his weaknes, through lack of sufficient resolution, to have beine the cause of his oversight at Perth the thrid of October ; quhilk had maid him to endure, since that day, a more hard wafrd and thraU- dome of mynd nor his imprissoned brethrein had sustained in their bodies, quhairof he could find no releiff untill he sould come befor their Lordships and acknowledge his former offence : and there [he] * Forbes evidently means, to profess the unlawfulness of that Assembly ; for it does not appear that Youngson ever entertained any doubt of its lawfulness. 432 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE thanked God that He had given him rest in his confession." The ChaunceUour, being disapoynted of his expectation, (for he luiked that he had beine purposed to yield, and to entreit his brethrein to the lyke,) demandit of him, E he was summond to that day with the rest ; and if not, how he came there ? Mr Robert answered, That he was summoned not be their Lordships, nor be the authoritie of any earthlie king or judge, bot be the great God [and Lord of Heaven*] and his own conscience, whose chairg he durst not dis obey. Quhairupon the Lords being not a little astonished and the ministers comforted, they wer removed, and Mr Robert Yewing- stoun with them, being first enrolled be the Clark at the Chaun ceUour his command among them. The Lords being advysed, and the ministers caUed bak againe, they wer wiUed to answer to the lybeU, becaus the Lords did find themselffes judges in that matter be vertew of the forsaid act in the yeir of God 1584. The ministers, perceiving that neither law nor reason could perswade the Lords to remit them to their judge ordinar, bot that they would take upon them, against aU equitie or preceiding exampUe, to judge in that matter ; and finding no uther remedie to prevent the inconvenients foUowing such a practeiss, wer compelled to give in ane Declinatour for dischairge of their dewtie to Christ and his Kirk in their calling; lest utherwayes the matters quhUk ought only to be subject to the judgment of Christ and the spirituaU office-bearers in his house according to his Word, sould be brought in subjection to the humane judgment of civiU judges, and so a fearfuU confusion brought in of judgment contrair both to the law of God and of men. The just coppie of the Dechnatour foUowes : — [See the Declinature in pages 139 and 140 of the pre sent volume, and in Calderwood's History, vol. vi. pp. 347-354.] This is that Dechnatour so much misconstructed and misreported, in the forsaid book of " Declaration," page 21 or 23 ; quhairin * From Gibson's MS. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 433 neither was his Majestie nor his royaU authoritie declyned, bot the. CounseU's judgment in that cause aUanerUe, as being no wayes competent m EcclesiasticaU matters. I leave it to the conside ration of every man who reads and considers the Summonds to judge, Quhat was the matter in question? whether it was for makeing a privat conventickle, directUe repugnant and against his Majestie's and CounseU's chairge and direction, against the continuaU custom and practeiss of the Kirk, and consent of aU. After the giving in hereof, that it might appeare to aU whose mindes were indifferently disposed, without prejudicate judgment, that the ministers used this Dechnatour, not out of any contentious disposition, weaknes of theE cause, or want of sufficient reason to cleare their innocencie, but only through the necessitie of that dutie which they owe to God, to his Church, and to their native countrey, in preserving the order established by God in bis Church, and ratified by the lawes of the land in its owne integritie, for the honor of God, the good and safetie of his Church, and the prosper ous and peaceable estate of the land, they gave in certane answers to the principaU points of the Summonds, .speciaUy against the aUeadged contempt and disobedience El their meeting, to make it manifest to aU Christian hearts how innocent they were in theE proceeding, and voide of aU the crimes and slanders wherewith . they were burdened ; which answeres they gave in by way of de claration, adhering stUl to their DecUnator, and not by way of action befor theE Honors as competent judges in that cause, * The contents of the Answers foUow : — ¦ [See these Answers in Calderwood's History, vol. vi. pp. 347-354.] The reasons being red, the Advocat maid ane reply to httle effect, hopping therby to induce the Ministers to enter in action befor the \ Lords and to misken their Dechnatour. Bot they, being willed be the Lord ChaunceUor to answer, [by their forsaid Speaker!] pro tested that they did stUl adhere to their Declinatour, and did not. * This paragraph is not in Swinton's MS. t From Gibson's MS. 2 E 434 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE acknowledge their Lordships as competent judges in that cause, and that they had given in these reasons only by way of declara tion, for satisfaction of aU godUe and honest hearts, in makeing manifest the equitie of their cause, and nowayes of any purpose to plead judiciaUie befor their Lordships. Heirupon the Ministers being removed, efter short advysement, beuig caUed back againe, the ChaunceUor reported and pronounced that the CounseU had found and declaired their Assembhe to be unlawfuU, and therfor commandit them to returne, every one to their severaU wairds, untill his Majestie's farder pleasour were knowen in that matter ; and Mr Robert Yewingstoun [Youngson] to enter with them that were in Stirling, to remain in waird with them. Upon the quhilk command, they, haveing in aU reverence declared their willingness to obey their Lordships in aU things concerning their bodies, guids, and lyves, their conscience only and dewtie to God in their callings reserved, did depairt. Thus the Eeader may perceave what a sturre hath bene keept for the Declinatour or Appeale, so much mistaken and misconstructed in the foresaid booke of " Declaration," (pages 21 and 23,) wherein neither was his Majestie's royaU authoritie dechned, but the Coun- cel's judgment in that cause only, as not being competent in EcclesiasticaU maters. I leave it to the consideration of everie one that readeth and considereth the Summonds, to judge what was the mater controverted, whether it was for making a private conventicle directly agauist his Majestie's and the Councel's com mandment and direction, against the continuaU custome and practice of the Church and consent of aU other Presbyteries, as is aUedged in the forsaid booke of " Declaration," (page 16,) or for keeping a GeneraU AssembUe : since that the verie Sum- mondes do grant the 2d day of Juhj to have beine appointed for the diet of the GeneraU AssembUe at Aberdene, confesse theiu to have beene authorised with commission from their Presbyteries, acknowledgeth them to have an AssembUe appointed and designed, , and charge them to appeare to heare and see the said Assembhe decried unlawful!, not because it was a private conventicle assem- ESTATE OF ^HE KIRK. 435 bled either without pubUck ordination of the diet, or without pubUck authoritie of the Presbyteries, sending them authorised with com missions ; but because it is aUeadged io have bene convened with out the King's consent, and against his commandement, contrary to the Act of Parhament 1592, and because some informaUtie was in their actions. The first, by the former discourse, may easUie be seene and knowne to be forged, though, otherwayes, the authoritie of the assembUes of the saints dependeth nowayes upon the will of man, but of Him alone in whose name they must be convened, and in whose name they are keept to do aU things ; who, as Lord over his owne House, hath only power and authoritie to command therin: neither is there any mediate authoritie betweene the Lord and his ambassadours, in the affaires of their message ; he only sendeth them ; he alone gives them to be pastors and doctors, &c. ; he alone shaU judge them ; he alone shaU reward them ; to him alone they must give an accompt of their dispensation ; and he himselfe alone doth immediatUe rule them by his Spirit and Word. For although there be diversitie of administrations, yet there is but one and the selfe same Lord ; neither hath that body of his two heades. That is the preeminence of the Sonne alone, incommunicable to man or angels, to be head of his Church, which is his body : so that it can not be heard, redde or considered without abhorring the iniquitie and pitying the blindness of men, caUing themselves Christians, who speake and write so heathnishlike of the authoritie of the assembUes of the saints, as subalterne to the civiU power of CivUl Conventions, as having no warrand but from the statuts of men. So Ul doth it become a profane politician to talk of spirituaU things, whose sight reacheth no further then the Umites of the estate of a province, and therefore would have the affaires of Christ's kingdome no less sub ject to the pleasure and direction of princes then the actions of the pohticke body, in their poUcie concerrting the affaires of this present Ufe. Wherefore it is not amiss that those preceeding Answers, by way of declaration, be made against the slanders of the Summonds, and for giving contentment to good Christians. * * This paragraph is not in Swinton's MS. 2 E 2 436 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE CAP. VI. THE FAVOURABLE ANSWERING OF MR GILBERT BROUN HIS COM PLAINT, THE RELEASING OF ME HENRY BLYTH OUT OF PRISON, AND PARTICULAR DEALLING WITH THE MINISTERS TO BRING THEM TO A CONFESSION. The same day, Mr GUbert Brown, being stUl in the CasteU upon his Majestie's chairges, did cause present ane complaint and sup phcation to the Lords, desyring to have restored to him sic sowmes of money and uther things, as he aUedged was taken from him be certaine of the guard at his apprehending : quhilk com plaint was heard and favourabhe answered, the CounseU ordaining all to be restored to him againe : Quhilk ordinance being obeyed, it was found that the most and principaU things that were taken from him were monuments and instruments of idolatrie, sic as Crucifixes, Agnus Dei's, Images, Relicks, &c. ; quhilks aU notwith standing, were, according to the CounseU's act, delyvered bak againe. And afterwards in December next following, being re leased out of prison, and suffered to remain at a friend's house in Edinburgh, upon a Sunday the visitors, upon suspicion, went and searched his lodging, found a chalice, which they presented to the CounceU, which ordained the chahce , first to be weighed, and thereafter burned at the market crosse, and the just value thereof to be restored to Mr GUbert Broune ; whom shortly thereafter, immediately before the returne of the Earles of Marre and Dumbar from Court, the CounceU sent out of the land by sea, with a hun dreth Markes in his purse, although it was reported that he knew of the Gunne-poulder Plott, and had, with others, conspired against the King. * Heirby may it in sum measour be knowen, of, quhat disposition these rulers be towards the trueth, and profes sours therof, and quhat sinceritie was in their hearts in promeis- * This sentence, beginning with " And afterwards in December," &c, is not in Swin- ton's MS. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 437 sing so far to the Presbitries in their letter before specified ; the most maUcious enemie of the gospeU within the land being so favourabUe used, contrair to the lawes, and the ministers of Christ so seveirly handled for the very practeiss ordinar of their caUing, approved be the lawes. The same day also was Mr Hendrie Blyth, * [upon a simple warrand from the Councell] t, without any condition, set at liber tie, and suffered to returne to his chairge. The two dayes foUowing, certain of the Lords traveUed with the ministers to bring their matter to sic a mids J as might satis fie his Majestie and procuir their libertie. The ministers, be ad vyse of diverse of the wyssest and gravest of their brethrein there present, did first present this offer to the Lords, That they would submitt themselffes, in aU that concerned themselffes, to his Majestie's wiU and pleasour, being assured that his Majestie. would not urge them in that quhUk concerned God, his Kirk, and their conscience ; and farder, that in aU humble submis sion they would beseech his Majestie to remit his wraith and be appeassed towards them. This offer being rejected of the CounseU, be advyse forsaid, the ministers againe presented ane uther offer, That for satisfieing of his Majestie, seeing the day appoynted be them at Aberdeine for the Assemblie was alreadie expyred and nuU in the selff, and that his Majestie had be open proclamation appoynted ane uther day, they would for themselffes agrie, that their appoynting of a new day in their AssembUe wer repute and haulden as though it had not beine done i and would beseech his Majestie, in all humble submission,, to. remitt his wraith, and be appeassed towards them,.. This offer also was refuissed. '£!i£__cause of the rejecting of both offers was the difEr[™ .; .^ betwixt the CounseU anaj3£=»~— ! — ^STrTthe Kirk ; the Coun sel! iyKing~~best of the' first offer, if it could have~~Deln~girr~ii * Henry Blyth was minister of the Canongate.. t From Gibson's MS. X Mids, such a means, or medium between extremes. 438 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE afeslinEe; the Commissioners lyking better of the second, J£i* could havebeis*^tained universaUie ; haveing morgjseg3ira to the establishing of their auSlsrsiie^be annulli»g""Ene authoritie of the Assemblie then to his Majesti^^a^!Sfe*iiaaj_j the CounseU, in the uther pairt, indeavoj^sBgrnore to have his MajesSB^aajfied by the Ministejs-esfemission, then the Commissioners authorised bylrfiSi- t&fof the AssembUe. * Therefor nothing could pleasse the CounseU without a simple confession of ane offence, and submission of themselffes and thair haUl proceedings to his Majestie's, censour, wiU and pleasour; and nothing could satisfie the Commissioners without the Assembhe, and haiU proceedings therat, sould be haulden nuU, that their com mission might stand in the fuU strength. The conference ceassed, and the MEusters returned to their severaU wairds. Heir it is not to be forgot how, in the CounseU's book of " Declaration," there is nothing of aU their proceechngs mentioned, except only the proponing the Declinatour. The Sup plication given before, and the Reasons efter, are no wayes touched, except in one word by the way, (p. 22,) aUedging them frivolous, and tyme more to be lossed then any matter uttered in useing them; quhairof we refer the judgment to the Reader ; only poynting at that quhilk is most to be considered, that by this theE poUicie in passing with sUence the Supphcation, the Reassons, [and] the deal ing efterward be offers, they delude the world by their calumnie used against the Ministers, as thogh by theE Dechnatour they had made a plain denyaU of their subjection to his Majestie, and of his royaU power and authoritie over them ; quhairas indeid they de clyned not his Majestie bot the CounseU aUanerUe, neither yet the Counsell simplie, bot in that EcclesiasticaU action only. * This paragraph is omitted in Gibson's MS. and cancelled in Swinton's by cross- lines ; and on the margin is the following note : — " This is bot a conjecture, Their reply will be, that ther was no Commissioner at that conference ; therfor see that be na apparent [ground] given of challenging them heir causles, quhilk may mak uther things less thoght of." ESTATE OF THE KIRK, 439 CAP. VH. CERTAINE PETITIONS GIVEN TO THE COUNSELL IN FAVOURS OF THE IMPRISONED MINISTERS. — THEIR LETTER TO THE PRESBI TRIE OF EDINBURGH FOR CLEARING OF THEIR INNOCENCIE. — TWO PETITIONS SENT TO THE KING, ONE FROM THE PRESBY TERIE OF EDINBURGH, AND ANOTHER FROM THE IMPRISONED MINISTERS, WITH OTHER PETITIONS TO THE COUNCELL, AND FURTHER SECRET PURPOSES AGAINST THE MINISTERS IN BLACK NES. Eiformation being sent to his Majestie from the CounseU, as they thoght meittest, of their proceidings, quhilk answer of his Majestie's mind is expected, the Lord, of his infinite mercie, makes that barbarous and inhumane conspiracie of the Papists against his Majestie, Queen, Prince, and haul posteritie, and Estaites of England, to be reveaUed, quhilk sould have beine exe cut the fyfth of November [1605,] in QuhythaU [Whitehall,] by powder, quhair the whoU bodie of the land sould have beine con veined in Parliament. From the quhUk danger his Majestie, &c, being delyvered, and pubUct thanks given therfore, it was expect ed that the Ministers sould have obtained their libertie ; bot a contrair conclusion was taken, as efterward saU appear. The Ministers warded in Blaknes, in reguard that they had suf fered much in their bodies, by reason of the unwholsomnes of that place, and were at such extraordinarie cost, that they were not able to hold out, gave a petition to the Lords, desiring to be removed from their prison, «or to have Ubertie to provide for themselves the best they might. The removing was flatly refused ; and touching the second, a letter was directed to the Constable of the CasteU, desiring him either to boord them reasonablie, so that he might be the more easihe payed by them, or else to suffer them to furnish themselves ; yet so as, in the meane time, he should use them ac cording to the Couucel's former direction, keeping them in severall 410 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE roomes, and from meeting together, or with any persone whatso ever, as he would answere to the Councell thereon. Such of the ministers as were in other prisons were not made closse prisoners, but were simply imprisoned. * The 14th of November three Supplications were presented to the CounseU, in favours of the ministers in wafrd, be the Commis sioners of the Synod of Lowthiane, and of the Presbitries of Fyffe, directed from them to that effect : the first desiring then* freedome ; 1. That they might be partakers and proclaim ers of that common joy for his Majestie, Queen, Posteritie, and Lords delyverie ; 2. For the comfort of their desolate flockes and famUies ; 3. For their povertie, through their extraordinarie chairges ; 4. Becaus of the infirmitie and weaknes of bodie contracted be long imprissonment. This being refuised, the second was, desyring them to be wairded in their own congregations. QuhUk also being refuissed, the thrid was, for the Ministers in Blaknes, desyring only their transporta tion to any uther waird, in respect of the danger they stood in of the pest, being broken up in the vUlagetown of Blaknes. Bot aU wer rejected; the CounseU willing the Commissioners, present ers, if they desired any favour, relieff, or ease to their brethrein, to procuir it by their own supphcation to his Majestie ; t And, likewise, their imprisoned brethrein themselves to send a petition to his Majestie ; promising to send both in their packet to his Highnes. Wherupon a petition was penned by Mr WiUiam Scot, minister at Cowper in Fife, to be sent to the King for the imprisoned breth ren, which is as foUoweth : — " May it please your Most Sacred Majestie, " As the God of all mercie, out of his fatherhe love hi Christ, contrarie to our merites, hath not only in your RoyaU persone spared your Majestie's subjects, but also hath filled aU your domi- * This paragraph is not in Swinton's MS. t From this place to the end of the paragraph in a subsequent sheet, beginning with the words " But before we proceede to so ungracious an action," &c. is taken from Gibson's MS. In Swinton's the whole portion is represented only by a few lines, briefly stating some of the facts which are stated at length in the other MS. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 441 nions with the glade and acceptable tidings of your Majestie's most prosperous and happy dehverie from that abominable conspi racie, so unnaturaUy plotted by the instruments of Sathan, those restles ennemies to the puritie of reUgion, the tranquiUitie of states and peace of people, against your Majestie's royaU persone, the cheefe defender and maintainer of these blessings in the whole world, the Queene's Majestie, your royaU chUdren, and strength of the royaU estate ; so we have carefuUy in our sermons, and alwayes as it became us, pubUshed the same to your Majestie's subjects here, using aU convenient meanes to stirre up their zealous devotion in praying God for that inestimable blessing, like as in aU churches, streets, and famUies of your Majestie's native and ancient kingdome here, the voice of joy hath bene most cheerfuUy heard, and to manifest everie way, that exceeding joy that all good subjects ought to have for the safetie of their most sacred Sovereigne, aU ceremonies of externaU rejoicing having bene most gladlie celebrated. Now, lest we, your most humble servants, should neglect our dutie, to congratulate with the earnest wishes of our loyaU hearts, for this present mercy and your Majestie's everlasting happines, the unspeakable goodnes of God in the gra cious dehverie ; we have presumed by these few hnes, humbly to offer to your princehe consideration, the speciaU sparkes that inflamed our hearts in the celebration of that joy ; first, the mer- cifuU continuance of God's loving protection, readie deliverie, con stant preserving and fatherhe care, watching at all times over your royaU persone ; nixt, the advancement of the Gospel, and with it many blessings peaceably enjoyed by aU your subjects under your most just and happy government ; and lastly, the horrible desola tion that would have ensued, if God's undeserved mercy had not prevented that inhumane crueltie: for the continuing and increasing of which benefits and cutting by the roote such desperate attempts, we are pricked with the feare, that still possesseth our hearts, to caU on God earnestly to roote out and extinguish such pernicious instruments with their devilish plottes. And for the more ample spreading of that manifold dehverie, upon our knees we most 442 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE humbly intreate your Most Sacred Majestie to extend the bowels of your fatherhe compassion unto the Ministers of the Gospel that ar here in prison, so much the rather, because, through long and strait unprisonment they ar whoUy impoverished ; some of them with weakness and sickness of body heavUy distressed ; others through feare of their Ufe by pestUence, closse by the gates of your Majestie's Castell, where they ar in prison ; and many here of your loyaU subjects, of aU degrie, quaUtie and calling, beside the flockes that want the comforts of their pastors, and wives and chUdren destitute of the necessarie support of thefr husbands and fathers, do earnestlie expect the gracious proofe of your Majestie's wonted clemencie, commonhe shewed to aU poore prisoners at such times ; since the Lords of your Privie CounceU here refuse to do any thing concerning their releasing, without your Majestie's expresse commandement. Thus, trusting in the Almightie God that he wiU give us mater daylie to rejoice in your Majestie's preservation, and your Estates maintained by Him, against the DeviU and hE instruments, to the great comfort of so many worthy subjects, as he hath made subject to your Most Sacred Majestie, yea to aU those that truelie feare God ; and humbly begging your Majes tie's pardon for this our boldnes, we wish your Majestie a long and happie reigne, God's fatherhe protection in this Ufe, and everlast ing glorie in the life to come. " Edinburgh, November 14. 1605. " Your Majestie's most humble servants." The greatest part of the foresaid Commissioners being gone to their chairges before the penning of this petition, it being sub scribed by Mr WUham Scot and Mr James Balfour, it was offered to Mr John HaU to be subscribed by him. It was re fused, though he was earnestlie intreated therto by Mr WiUiam Scot, and so it was left with the said Mr James Balfour, tiU it might be subscribed by the rest of the commissioners of the Synod of Louthian. Upon the 15th and 16th of the same November, the Ministers in ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 443 Blaknes being assuredly informed that Mr John HaU, minister of Edinburgh, not only in private conference, but pubhckly in the pulpit and in the Presbyterie, had uttered some uncharitable speeches, prejudiciaU to their cause and persones, affirming the cause to be of no moment, as being a matter not woorth two straes, wherin they stood with the King ; and that, through their wUftdl contention, they had justly deserved their affliction, and were the cause of trouble and disquieting the peace of the Church ; affirm ing plainly, that howsoever before, yet now they could not pretend conscience for their cause, since that in their last conference with the CounceU, they had departed from that which they pretended to be the ground of their conscience before in that cause : Here upon, they being justly grieved, did penne a letter for clearing of their mnocencie in all these points, and sent it to the Presbyterie of Edenburgh for their satisfaction, upon the 19th day of the said moneth, which is as foUowes : — [See this letter in Calderwood's History, vol. vi. p. 368. It is dated Blackness, Nov. 18. 1605.] This letter being redde in the Presbyterie before such as were present for the time, and the cause and estate of the imprisoned brethrein regrated by them aU, it was thought fit in reguard of the absents, nameUe of Mr John HaU, Mr David Lindsey and Mr Patrick GaUoway, that there should be a meeting againe in the aftemoone, for finding out some way to remeede the griefe of the distressed brethren. In the afternoone, they being conveined againe with such as had bene absent, save Mr David Lindsay, after reading and long conference touching the forsaid letter, and some reasoning betweene Mr James Balfour and Mr John HaU upon some points therof, which Mr John Hall tooke to be meant of himself, who likewise doubted not to affirme plainly, that the cause of the said Ministers suffering was not the cause of Christ ; the answering of this letter was delayed tiU the nixt Pres byterie day. Upon the 26th of November, the CounceU being convened, the 444 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE Ministers in Blaknes sent in another petition, after the manner foUowing : — " May it please your Honors of his Majestie's Privie CounseU, — After so often refusing once to vouchsafe an indifferent eare to our humble petition, we have hitherto offered what either con science can permit or justice require for procuiring an end of our suffering, which hath bene imposed upon us in a harder maner, and stiU continued in the same measure a longer time than might have sufficed to have satisfied the discontentment of aU minds, moved more upon sinistrous report then upon our evU deeds. We have offered ourselves to a lawfuU triaU of the lawes, and to such punishment as may lawfully be inflicted upon us, and just con demning of us in any crime or offence committed against the lawes ; but we ar not heard. We have offered, if present trial cannot be found, to put in surtie in what forme it pleaseth your Honors to devise, to be answerable hereafter to the lawes, when your Lord ships opportunitie and pleasure shaU require, upon lawful warning ; but this is also refused. In matters of our caUing we have shewed our wUhngnes to undergoe the censure of such as from Christ have the caUing and authoritie to governe the affairs of his House ; yet nothing hitherto hath procured us hbertie or ease of our closse im prisonment, being more rigorous than customeably hath bene in joyned to most heinous malefactors, being debarred from one of another's companie, and so closehe shut up that no friend or other creature can have accesse unto us. E our evUl behaviour merites such indignation, and if in our doings there be such a heinous transgression that ought to be punished with greater severitie than the greatest vilanies, we humbly beseech your Lordships to delay no justice, but to let us have the punishment due to our merites, and not stiU to keipe us under the appearing show of guUtines, and in the estait of most guUtie persons, before we be convinced and subject to punishment by the lawes. If stUl there be any thing lacking in our offer that justice or equitie can require to satis fie the desire of a just, though a most severe judge, we ar ready in all humble submission to perform it. But if the benefit of the estate of the kirk. 445 lawes cannot be obtained, and this rigorous keeping of us so closse be stiU continued, thereby to force us to take upon us guUtines, which neither the lawes can lay upon us, nor the judgement of our owne conscience convince us, we must patiently commit our cause to God, the great judge of aU judges in aU causes ; being resolved by his grace, to indure the extreamest severitie of whatsoever affliction man can lay upon us rather than to draw in upon our selves the insupportable burden of God's wrath, or to spoU our selves of the peace of a good conscience ; wherunto we hope your Honors wUl nowayes force us, both for the reverence we think you carie to God ; for the conscience which we think your Honors make of the caUing wherwith it hath pleased Hhn to honour you ; for the respect you carie to that ambassage which Jesus Christ hath con- credited to us ; and the dutifuU care which your Honors should have that the blessed name of the Lord Jesus, the Word of his eternaU truth, and the sacred and holy profession of Christianitie, be neither iU spoken of by your Honors nor by us. So, humbly recommend ing our comfortles estate to your Christian consideration; our suffer ing and cause therof to your equitable judgement ; and the pitifull desolation of our flockes, in such a time, when aU men have just cause of rejoicing,- and our utterlie impoverished famUies, to your Honors pitie and commiseration ; we desire no more but that ye may so remember us, and deal with us as your consciences may be able to secure you in the sight of the Lord, when he shaU bring everie work to judgment^ and weigh them in the scales, not of affliction but of justice. So, expecting [your] favourable and lov ing answer, we humbly recommend your Lordships and aU your proceedings in this and aU other your affaires, to the gracious government of the Spirit of grace and righteous judgment. - " From Blaknes, the 25th of November 1605." This petition being redde before the CounceU, the Lords answer ed, That they could do nothing in this business without the King's speciaU warrand ; and therefore they ordained, that if the Ministers would send a petition to his Majestie, they would send it safelie 446 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE to him. The same day, the Presbyterie of Edenburgh, touching the answer to the ministers letter, wherupon they had advised tiU this day, resolved to send in their names, subscribed by their Mo derator and Clerk, the petition written by Mr WiUiam Scot, which Mr James Balfour had in keeping. And because the Presbyterie would not do this without thefr knowledge, they sent a copie of the said petition, with a letter from themselves, wherof the copie followes : — " The Spirit of the Lord comfort you, " Welbeloved Brethren in Christ, having advised long upon the best way, in our judgement, of the easing of your comfortles estate to the appearance of the world, howbeit, otherwayes, we doubt not of your inward joy of mind, that upholdeth you in this afflic tion ; we thought it fittest that a Petition were sent to the King in our names, subscribed by the Moderator and Clerk of the Presby terie of Edenburgh, that ye may be set at libertie out of your strait prison. And to the end that we do nothing rashhe herein, we have thought it most expedient to send you the copie of the said petition that we might know your judgement, what ye think of it, and whether we should send it or not, and what it is able to effectuate at the King's hands when it is sent ; which we desire you deephe to consider. And, therfore, we require your answere als speedUy as yee can conveniently, what we shaU do in this mater. And so we committ you to God's mercifuU protection, who, in his own good time, wUl ease you of aU your trouble. " From Edenburgh, November 26, 1605. . " Your brethren in Christ, Mr Charles Lumisden, Clerk to the Presbyterie, in all our names." This was the answere that the ministers in Blaknes receaved to their former letter, upon the 27th of that moneth. And the said ministers sent an answere to them againe within a day therafter, the substance wherof was, The acknowledging of their care and ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 447 dihgence for their case; aUowing of that course that they had taken for the procuring of their relief, declaring that their opinion was, that it were best that each one in particular should subscribe the petition, if it might be obtained. The Ministers in Blaknes, being informed of the answere which the CounceU gave to their former petition, thought it fit to send a petition to the King, in the name of the ministers that were imprisoned, subscribed by them aU, wherof the contents foUow : — " Most gracious and dread Souvereigne, " May it please your Sacred Majestie to pardon our boldness ; for the conscience of our dutie hath forced us, by this our letter, to congratulate unto your Majestie that glorious dehverie from that most crueU and treasonable attempt intended against your Majes tie's sacred person, your gracious Queene, the Prince and poste ritie, against the whole Church and commonwealth in these your Majestie's dominions, the like whereof hath never bene heard in ¦any age ; and the joy and consolation of so rare a benefit, as it hath stretched forth itseffe to aU your faithfuU and loyaU subject, so should the glorie thereof, as the sound of many waters, and as the voice of a great multitude, resound unto Him who is the faithfuU preserver of men, unto whom aU praise and glorie, both in heaven and earth belong. This hardnes of our closse keeping ; the weaknes of our bodies through this long imprisonment, some of us for the space of fifteen weekes ; the knpoverishing of us and our famUies through the extraordinarie charges we have bene at here ; the feare of the devoring angeU comming to the gates where some of us are, and readie to enter in at the dores ; the want of the use of our comfortable ministeries so long ; neither these, nor anything else, can be of force to extinguish the unspeakable joy of so glorious a mercy, which not we only, but aU the Reformed Churches in Europe have, and shah reape the same. Hereby, we aU, our wives and chUdren, and aU your Majestie's loyaU subjects, received (as it were) our Uves of new again. Hereby the Uberties of these your Majestie's kingdomes and commonwealths have beene pre- 448 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE served from most fearfuU tyrannie and bondage. Hereby hath the sunne of that most glorious Evangel, not only stood still in our firmament, to give light and comfort to his poore Church, but also being so neare the setting, that the shadowes of the evening had almost covered us, is wonderfuUy caUed backe againe by manie degries, that it might not make haste to go downe in our times, nor in the times of our posteritie after us. Hereby Ught and joy, gladnes and honor are come to aU the saints, in aU and everie kingdome and province, in aU and everie citie and place, where soever this wonderfuU deliverie is knowne. And aU these and many moe we have received through the benefit of so large and blessed a preservation, so that now nothing can be hard to us to indure ; yea, if it were, to be offered up in the sacrifice of this your Majestie's preservation and consolation, which hath redounded to aU the Reformed Churches therby, yet would we rejoice with your Majestie in aU your joy. It is therefore sufficient for us that our eyes have seene and our eares have heard of so great a salvation, to be recorded and declared to aU posteritie to come. And as for us, what can be hard for us now, since the King Uveth, and the light of Israel is not quenched, and he hath to sit after him upon the throne, to do justice and judgement, out of whose breasts the 'Church may suke protection and defence. We have eneugh and have received all things, and ar fuUy satiat ; yet, if it might stand with your Majestie's pleasure to adde this joy to aU the former, as to make us partakers of your Majestie's favour and woonted cle- mencie, declared at all times to aU sort of your Majestie's subjects, but speciaUy at such an occasion of so gracious and notable deli veries, whereby the hearts of aU the chUdren of affliction commonly ar comforted, and the prisoners brought from hope to Ubertie, then should not the praises of our God be closed within these waUes, so should we not only proclame them ourselves, but also by our ministeries, take a coale from the altar and touch the lips and inflamme the hearts of aU your subjects, cheaflie in our owne con gregations, (whose hearts ar somewhat straitned, and their joy limited and bounded, because of the want of that glorious Gospel ESTATE OF THE KIRKr 449 in our ministeries, whereby salvation shined upon their hearts,) that they with us, and we with them, might cause the heaven and earth to resound with the voices of praise and joy. We have no more to render to your Majestie but the holding up of our hands, and the underpropping of aU other your Majestie's people, so far as our ministeries can reach, lest they should faint, and so Amalek prevaUe. Thus prostrating ourselves in aU humble reverence at your Majestie's feete, for the spreading of a lap of the bowels of your compassion and fatherhe love over us, our distressed famUies, and above twelve thousand souls in our desolat congregations, famishing for the want of the word of grace, and now wandring like sheepe without sheepheards, that the mouthes of the hungrie, and of those that ar in distresse, may bhsse your gracious Majestie and your happy posteritie more and more, and that we may take our harpes in our hands and stand at the glassie sea, to sing the song of Moyses the servant of God, and of the Lambe, with the rest of the saints. So, expecting your Majestie's gracious answere, we, upon the knees of our hearts, wish the multiplying of all the Hissings of God, peace and prosperitie in this Ufe, unto your Majestie, with the continuance of the same unto your posteritie to the end of the world, and eternall Ufe in the world to come. " From the place of our imprisonment, November 29. 1605. " Your Majestie's most humble Supphcants, loving and loyaU subjects and day lie orators." Both this and the former petition having beene delivered to his Majestie, no comfortable answere was sent backe againe, and that through the meanes of the pretended Commissioners, chiefly of Mr John HaU, who gave his Majestie inteUigence that they were to be sent, and prevented the favour that might have beene procured by them at the King's hands. The Ministers in Blaknes, hearing of no answere from the King, about the 19th day of December, sent this petition foUowing to the CounceU : — " May it please your Honors, — Howsoever it be that we have not obtained that favour of you, as to make any answere at aU 2 F 450 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE unto our petitions, yet we cannot cease to importune your Honours with our new petition, knowing that yee are in the Lord's steed, to do justice and judgement, essaying everie way, and waiting in patience, if the Lord wUl at any time move your Honors to con sider our estates, which now are such, that if they were throughly knowne to you, we are assured they could not but stirre up com passion in the hearts, at least of so many as looke to find mercy and compassion for themselves in that great day. If neither this tedious and closse imprisonment of twenty-one weeks aEeady past ; this extreame povertie that we are brought to, through these ex- traordinarie charges sustained here ; the infirmitie of our bodies ; the evident danger wherunto we are exposed in the devoting . plague, now the second time broken up closse by the gates where we are ; the depriving of our soules of the consolation of our minis terie ; the distresse of our wives and chUdren ; if none of these wUl move your Honors to compassion, yet let the pitifuU estate of above twelve thousand soules in fourteen desolate congregations, famished for want of our ministerie, and impietie and unrighteous- nes, to the dishonour of God, and procuring of his wrath against both Church and Commonwealth, abounding among them since our imprisonment, be considered by your Honors, and reguard * them and us, as ye would be reguarded in that great day. We intreate your Honors to consider that we are your brethren in Christ, in that same communion of faith and rehgion ; that we have obtained this favour, to be his servants, and to be ministers of Christ in his Gospel ; that we are but only messingers, and did nothing save that which was within the compasse of our commis sion and calling ; that the thing which was done, (namehe the keep ing and allowing of an Assembhe,) is neither in itselfe unlawfuU, being agreiable to aU divine and humane lawes, neither any new and insolent thing, being observed and practised forty-three yeares , within this Church and Kingdome. And shaU no reguard be had of us, speciaUy at this time of so great and rare a dehverie, and rejoiceing of aU the Churches ? Shall our mouths only be stopped, that we may not with our congregations proclame the prayses of ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 451 our God ? Is that which we have done as servants and messingers onlie of God and of his Church, within the boundes of our calling, in so lawfuU and accustomed a thing, so heigh an offence, that so rare and so Erge a manteU of protection aiid deliverie cannot cover, so deepe a mercy and love cannot swallow up ? Should we be forced by rigour and extremitie to confesse an offence, wherof, in the sight of God and of his elect angels, and of your Honors, we here protest, that we are not convicted in our consciences? We wiU cease to trouble your Honors any further, only intreating you, in aU humble reverence, by the great name of the Lord our God, and that his glorious appearance, for our former liberties ; that our prayers and praises, with our congregations, pubhcke and private, be not wanting in such a commodious time, of so glorious a mercy shewed ; and that the blood of so many soules, ready to perish for want of the bhssed truth in our ministeries, cry not in the eares of the said Lord of Hosts, and arme him with greater wrath against this Church and Commonwealth. We recommend your Lordships to his direction and grace, desiring most humbly your Honors answere. " From Blaknes the 18th of December 1605." This petition received no better answere than the former. But the word of the home-comming of the Earles of Marre and Dum- barre, in reguard of the petitions sent before to the King, made aU men expect a warrand for setting of the ministers at libertie to be sent by them : which made the Lord ChanceUer and the Lord President to direct Mr Andrew Forester, minister of Dum- fermling, in commission to the ministers warded in Blaknes, to desire them to come to a confession of an offence in their meeting at Aberdene, which had beene required of them before ; promising to cause the CounceU convene with all convenient expedition, in alse great quietnes as could be,- and upon the said confession to set them at libertie. This they did to prevent the effect of the expect ed warrand, and to get the praise of their Ubertie to themselves. The Ministers, considering the thing that was desired, answered, 2F2 452 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE That as yet their conscience had neither accused them of any of fence done to the King ; neither could their brethren who traduced them most, though earnestly required therto by their letter, be able to informe them in any thing done amisse by them ; neither as yet had any lawfuU and cleare triaU of judgement, according to the lawes, found them guUtie. So as yet they could not, unless they would lie against the truth of God sealed up in theE conscience, make any such confession ; but as ever before, so stUl they were not only readie to suffer whatsoever lawfuU and ordinarie triaU ; and if any man were able, evidentUe to make theE offence and transgression [manifest] to their conscience, they would in aU humUity acknowledge and amend their fault according to reason. But notwithstanding these things, the King had resolved to cause put the ministers to the trial of a jurie for treason, because they had refused the Councel's judgement bo. the mater of their Assemblie. For performing wherof, because the Lord ChanceUor and the Lord President feared to prosecute that wicked purpose, in reguard the thing alreadie done by them had given great discontentment to all men; therefore whatsoever might happen, fearing the worst, they had written before to the King, desiring the Earle of Dumbarre to be sent to countenance the matter, that through his presence and assistance the mater might be the more jsafelie performed, and they somewhat released of the envie, or then more strengthened by his assistance to beare the burden of it. Yet nevertheles, the Earles of Dumbarre and Marre being come to Edinburgh, and having consulted with them in that business, they were aU so afrayed to put it in execution that they durst neither publishe it, nor hazard to practise it in the citie of Edenburgh. Therefore, for their greater safetie, they appointed the CounceU to sit in Linlithgow upon the 10th of Januarie ; because it was within two mUes of Blaknes, where six of the ministers were, at whom they aymed cheeflie ; so that they might easihe cause bring them from their prison to the barre without forwarning or knowledge of their purpose. And that the place should not give any suspicion of their intention, they caused spred some rumors, that they went ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 453 to the said towne for some other more weightie affaires, touching the Gunne-poulder Treason revealed in England, as though there had bene some noblemen of Scotland guiltie thereof, and to be apprehended that day. A Uttle before this, upon the 2d of Januar [1606], the CounceU being convened, and the Earle of Dumbarre with them, the ministers in Blacknes, through some Uttle notice they had, fearing the Earle's errand, which hitherto had bene closely keept, sent a petition to the CounceU ; which being geven in by Mr WiUiam Scot, minister at Cowper, not onlie was rigorouslie refused, but inquisition made with great threatning by the Lord Chanceller of the presenter, saying, " Who durst present such a thing ?" The Ministers, because of the secret intelligence they had, that they were to be accused of treason at Linlithgow, upon the 10 th of Januar sent to Edenburgh to Mr Thomas Craige, Advocat for the Church, Mr WUliam Oliphant, Mr Thomas Hope, Mr Thomas Gray, Advocats and CounceUers, desiring them to try if they were to be accused before the Lord Justice at Lkdithgow, and for what crime ; and if they found any certaintie to advertise them, and be ready themselves to keep that day, to plead for them ; desiring them withaU to come a day or two before to Blacknes, to conferre with them for their better information. And, in the meane time, be cause they suspected their declining of the Councel's judgment in the question of the lawfulnes or unlawfulnes of their Assemblie at Aberdene, to be the ground wherupon their accusation was to be budded, they sent them a copie of their Appeale, * desiring them to be advised therwith. According to the said Ministers desire, the Advocats mett and advised upon the Appeale, and sent them word that they would be readie to satisfie their desire, both in keeping the day at LinUthgow, and in conferring with them a day or two before, if they could find any certaintie that any accusation was intended against them the said day, whereof as yet they had no assurance ; because no warning was geven to the Lord Justice to be present, as he himselffe had told them, and the Councell * The word Appeale in Gibson's MS. is uniformly used for Declinature in Swinton's. 454 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE i etiU dissembled, as if they had had no such purpose in hand, and made the word go that it was for other causes, as it is said before, fearing both difficultie and danger in accomphshing their intention, if it were pubhshed ; which also was the cause that made them change the place of the CounceU, not darting hasard to attempt so ungracious an action, upon so slender grounds, against such per sons within Edenburgh. Which dissimulation of the CounceU, and contrarie rumors going theron, made the said Ministers secure, and so much the rather, because no summonds nor warning was directed against them, for their appearing to answere in any thing before either CounceU or Lord Justice, or any other judge ; which they thoght should have beene done in reguard that they wer warded for no crime. Upon the 8th of Januar the forsaid Advocates came to Blaknes, without any certaintie as yet of the forsaid purpose, being sent from the Earle of Dumbarre to sie if they could bring the Minis ters wairded there to acknowledge an offence in their meeting, and to submit themselves to the King's will and pleasure ; wherein they laboured verie earnestly, although the said ministers had, by suffi cient reason, made them apprehend the equitie of their cause, and the great discommoditie which by their said confession or submis sion would foUow, to the prejudice of the hbertie of the Church of God and kingdome of Christ. After the which reasoning, the said Advocats having layed before them the appearing dangers and difficulties which were liklie to arise, upon their refusing, to their persones, and to the estate of the whole Church of this land, they left them to advise that night, and so departed to LinUthgow, without any resolution touching the forsaid purpose of their future accusation, save only their promise to be in readines to pleade for them, if need should require. Upon the 9th of Januar the ministers in Blacknes sent their for said resolution to the forsaid Advocats to Linlithgow, to be impart ed to the Earle of Dumbarre, desiring Mr Thomas Hope to take the paines to come and conferre with them, touching the bussines which they had neglected the day before : Who, being come, ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 455 he renued againe the forsaid sute of submission, and by many arguments endeavoured to persuade the imprisoned ministers to consent therto ; whose arguments they satisfied with sufficient rea son, to the contentment both of the said Mr Thomas Hope, and such of thefr brethrein as, in a reasonable number, were come to visite them, upon the rumor that they were to be accused at Lin Uthgow the next day foUowing ; nameUe, Mr John Scrumger, minis ter at Kingorne ; Mr MitcheU Cranstoun, minister at Cramont ; Mr Robert Eklin [Echlin,] minister at Ennerkething ; Mr Robert ColviU, minister at Culrose ; Mr John Row, minister at Camok ; Mr WiUiam Arthur ; with divers other godly and zealous brethrein. So after a short conference touching the principaU bussines, without any effectuaU resolution, the day being spent, Mr Thomas Hope returned to LinUthgow. After whose departing Mr James Melvill came to Blaknes, with Mr John Dikes and Mr WiUiam Murray, being moved, by some advertisment upon the forsaid rumours sent to them, to go to Edenburgh for further triaU of the truth of the said bussines, and upon the knowledge which they had received there, were moved to go to their brethrein, to accompanie and assist them the nixt day, as necessitie should require ; by whom the Ministers in Blaknes were first assuredhe informed of their future accusation. CAP. VIII. OF THE CONVOYING OF THE MINISTERS FROM BLAKNES TO LIN LITHGOW, AND THE DEALING WITH THEM BEFORE THEIR ARRAIGNMENT. Upon the 10th ot Januar, two houres or therby before day, the guard came to the CasteU of Blaknes, and with sound of trumpet wakened the Constable, shewing that they were come with a warrand to receive the warded ministers, and convoy them to the CounceU, who were caused to make themselves ready in haste, because the CounceU had directed them to come before 456 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE them at seven of the clock in the morning at the farrest. Thus were they as malefactors convoyed to LinUthgow, and put in a chamber within the Palace, and still attended by the guard. An hour or thereby after their comming, through the mercifuU providence of God, they found a great number of the gravest, wisest, and most zealous of their brethren, besides [those] that had beene with them the night before, farre beyond their expectation, assembled, to their great comfort; of whom were Mr Andrew MelviU, Mr Patrick Symson, minister at Stirhng, Mr Archibald Symson, minister at Dalkeith, Mr John Ker, minister at Salt- prestoun, Mr WUUam Birnie, Mr John CarmicheU, Mr Henry Levingstone, Mr Adam BaUenden, Mr Ninian Drummond, with diverse others from diverse Presbyteries ; with almost the whole brethren of the Presbyterie of LinUthgow, Mr John BeU, minis ter at Cather, of the Presbyterie of Glasgow, and some from the Presbyterie of Dumbartane ; in aU forty or thereby. Thus, they being in the chamber within the Palace, the Lords Newbotle, Blantire and Whittinghame, * were directed to them from the CounceU; who, by earnest persuasion, and many argu ments taken from the danger Uke to foUow, laboured with them to take back their Appeale geven before the CounceU, promising that if they would do so, they would intercede at the King's hands for their libertie ; and laying before them the great prejudice, that the sentence of the CounceU aEeady pronounced, finding them selves judges in that cause, notwithstanding the said Appeale, might bring to the cause of Christ's kingdome and libertie of the Church, together with the manifold inconveniences which, through their refusing, were most like to foUow, partly upon the King's wrath and indignation, wherby he should be moved to deall more hardly with the Church, through diminishing the Uber ties therof, and erecting and bringing in the tyrannicaU authoritie * Three of the Lords of Session, Mark Ker, Commendator of Newbottle, WUliam Stewart, Commendator of Blantyre, and Archibald Douglas of Whittingham ; the two former were, in the course of 1606, raised to the Peerage as Earl of Lothian and Lord Blantyre. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 457 of Bishopes over their brethren, which was the thing they feared most ; and partly upon the condemnatorie sentence which doubt- les would be pronounced against them by the jurie, convicting them of treason for rejecting of his Majestie's CounceU, which would be a most dangerous preparative, if, through their wUfulnes, it should be often practised. Thus subtUy they endevoured to make it appeare, that what they had already resolved to performe, for their particular ends, against Christ, should proceede of the ministers obstinacie m refusing to yield to the King on a thing (as it seemed to them) indifferent. The Ministers answered, That as through necessitie, for defence of their Christian libertie and maintenance of the spirituaU libertie and jurisdiction of the Church, they were compeUed to give in the said Appeale, upon the Councel's obstinat refusing to admit their humble petition, grounded both upon the Word of God, law, reason and practise, desiring that in that mater of the lawfulnes or un- lawfulnes of their Assemblie, for the which they were warned to answer before their Honours, they might be sent backe, (it being an EcclesiasticaU cause,) to the lawfuU and ordinary judgment of the GeneraU Assemblie : so, Ukewise, through the like necessitie, they were forced to refuse to revoke their Appeale againe, seeing it was the only defence whereby the Church might secure itselfe from the iniquitie and inconvenience of the forsaid sentence, which, by the revoking of the said Appeal, should be made to stand in full strength and force against the Church, and hbertie of the spirituaU juris diction therof, as a most dangerous preparative in aU such cases, in aU times coming. Touching the dangers that might foUow, either to the Church in general, or to their persons in particular, upon the forsaid pretended grounds of the King's wrath, and sen tence of treason to foUow upon them, they would not be persuaded that the King, their gracious Souvereigne, could any wayes be mov ed to any indignation, either against the Church or their persons, for their proceidings, being so lawfuU and warranded by the grounds before specified, and tending to no other end but the necessarie dis tinction of the spiritual! and civUl jurisdiction hitherto inviolably 458 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE observed, both by practise, and the King's own presence, to the great comfort both of Church and Commonwealth, and authorised by his Majestie's own lawes ; neither yet that any judge or jurie, that had any respect, how smaU soever, either of God's eternal judgment, or of the peace and joy of a good conscience, and the smaUest reguard of the kingdome of Christ, and Ubertie of their native country, could be induced to involve themselves in so fear- full a guiltines as to convict so innocent persons of so heigh a crime. And although aU these things should happen, yet they could not find any warrand in conscience to deny so dutifuU a tes timonie in so necessarie a time, or to depairt from so lawfuU a de fence, in a cause so dangerous to the Church, and in so doing to betray the libertie thereof. And seeing they knew that it was not the wiU of God that evU should be done that good might come of it, they could not choose either to redeeme the Church from supposed thraldome, or their persons from any intended perU, by so grievous a transgression ; since they were assured that not only their owne consciences, but their Honours also should beare them record, that whatsoever harme were done to the Church of God, or wrong to their persons, should proceede from no just cause ministred by them, howsoever the enemies of Christ and his kingdome, whose purpose was by pohcie to tred under foot the hbertie, frie and law- full jurisdiction of Christ's kingdom, should pretend these proceed- uigs as a cause or cloake to cover their iniquitie ; and therefore they had rather choose to commit themselves and that cause to the direction and government of God, who had the hearts and hands, the wayes and working of aU creatures in his hand, without whose providence they knew that neither any hurt could come to the Church, nor a haire of their heades faU to the ground. After this, some of the Lords, finding themselves to prevaile nothing by their publick dealing with aU in common, delt with them severally apart, endeavouring by fair promises of recompence of losse and libertie to persuade some of them to yield. But find ing their labour lost, they returned to the Councell ; and within a short time therafter came backe againe with the Lord CoUector, ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 459 the Lord Advocat, * and Sir Robert MelviU, where the Lord Advocat, having made some signification of the Councel's good affection and earnest desire to have the mater agried with content ment to the King, peace to the Church, and safetie of their per sons, did afterwardes declare the necessitie of their proceeding to cause put them to the triaU of a jurie, before the Lord Justice, in reguard of the Kmg's direction contained in his letter, which the CounceU had sent with his Lordship there to shew to them ; and the inevitable convicting of them, if they should hazard to under- goe such a triaU, in respect of the first Act of the Parliament 1584, ordaining aU persones, of whatsoever estate or caUing, to in- curre the paine of treason, who should presume to reject the judgement of the King or of his Privie CounceU, in any cause whatsoever ; and herewith did aggravate the danger before speci fied, which would arise hence ; and therefore, that it was their Honour's earnest desire, since no other thing could satisfie his Majestie, that they should take backe their Appeale againe, and so hinder the forsaid triaU and danger that might follow theron. To this they answered, That if their Honours would abrogate the Processe and Act of Councell which was made against them, that it might not remaine as a preparative thereafter, to the prejudice of the Church of God, and spirituaU officers therof, in such causes, they would in that case be content to revoke their Appeale ; other wayes they would not, for the foresaid causes. To this the Lord Advocat rephed, That the Lordes could not consent to that condi tion, because the forsaid Act, wherin they had found themselves to be judges, was alreadie inserted and recorded in their bookes, and so could not be abrogated or taken out againe. The Ministers answered, That in case the said Act could not be taken away, yet they would be contented to take backe their Ap peale, provided-that their Honours would make another Act annull ing the former, and taking all strength and authoritie from it ; that it might neither stand against them as an argument, that they * Sir Thomas Hamilton, afterwards created Viscount Melrose, and Earl of Had dington. 460 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE were convicted in the mater of the lawfulnes or unlawfulnes of their Assembhe, for which they were warned to appeare before their Honours, nor yet as a preparative to be aUeadged any time hereafter against the Church, to the prejudice therof, in the hke cases. The Lord Advocat replied, That the Lordes could not annull the forsaid Processe and Act convicting them, set downe against them ; neither was it needfuU for them to require it, for any danger that thereof, by revoking of their Appeale, might come to the Church, since their Appeale was given in by them as one of their defenses, in the particular action persued against them before the Lords ; and, therfore, as anie man might lawftdly depart from his defences without prejudice of any other person in the like cause, so also they might depart from their Appeale, it being given in as their defence, without prejudice or harme to the Church at any time hereafter. The Ministers answered, That if their meeting at Aberdene, and proceedings thereat, and so the action persued before the Privie CounceU therfore had beene their owne particular, and not the common cause of the Church of Scotland, his Lord ship's argument might have had some appearance of reason to per suade them ; but since they were not privat persones in the for said proceedings, being sent with Commission from their brethren, and representing their persones in aU that they did, according as in all AssembUes, both civill and ecclesiasticaU, the persones as sembled by commission do represent the whole body of those that sent them, it could not be but whatsoever they did in that bussi nes behoved to conceme the whole body ; and therfore their de parting from their lawfuU defence in that action, wherein they stood for the Church, as their Commissioners, representing their persones, behoved to be prejudiciaU to the whole Church in all times comming. And therfore his Lordship's reason could be no warrand to their conscience in that cause, upon any respect of their owne ease or relief, to bring into danger by their deed the libertie of the whole Church and kingdome of Christ within the land. The Lord Advocat, with the other Lords there present, desired ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 461 the Ministers to take the advise of the gravest and wisest of their brethren convened there for the tune, and after consultation with them to returne their answere to the CounceU, within alse short time as they could, because the day was farre spent. The Minis ters answered, That howsoever they were in that mater sufficiently resolved, and by the assistance of God's grace, ready to suffer whatsoever severitie it. should please the Lord to permit to be used against them, yet, neverthelesse, they would not refuse the benefit of their brethren's advise, according unto which they would re turne their answere to their Honours. Thus the Lords departed, and the brethren of the ministerie that convened at that time, about forty or therby, (as it hath bene said,) were admitted to them. After calling on the name of God, the six Brethren that were to be accused having layed open the mater to the other brethren, and declared their resolution therin, rather to abide the uttermost danger, in hope of the Lord's assistance, before they would, by recalling their Appeale, prejudge the Church in her lawfull libertie, geven to her by Christ her Lord, in his Word, and now in his mercy approved by the lawes of this land, and so long possessed and practised with such a blessing ; finding in their conscience that all men had just reason, by such a deed, to hold them as traitours to Christ and his Crowne, and betrayers of the liberties of his Church and kingdome : Therfore they desired them, either by some cleare hght out of God's Word to informe their consciences to the con- trarie, which they would be ready in aU humUitie to embrace, or -^then to assist them by their comfortable encouraging, that they might be the more enabled and strengthened to give a faithfull and frie testimonie of the truth of God, since now they were called therto, and to beare in patience, with joy and cheerfulnes of heart, whatsoever were the wUl of the Lord that they might suffer therfore. The Brethren of the ministerie being greatly comforted with the constant resolution of those that were to be arraigned in so mani fest a danger, as wUling rather to lay downe their lives then, in 462 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE the smaUest iote, to prejudge Christ of his glorie and honour, and his Church of her Ubertie, or to make any shew or appearance to their adversaries that they were any wayes ashamed of the trath of God and testimonie of Jesus ; they were so much the more moved to compassion, and therfore did gravehe dispute and rea son, whether their brethren might pro tempore et loco caU backe their Appeale, with protestation to be made, either by themselves or their remanent brethren, that it should be nowayes prejudiciaU to the Church therafter, that so (if possibly it might be) their brethren might be dehvered from the imminent danger. These things being considered by the brethren, and for a certaine time discussed, in end everie man being particularly inquired of his judgment, it was found, by an universaU consent, the brethren to be arraigned could nowayes, without great prejudice to the Church of God, take backe their Appeale at that tune, for any danger that could therby come to their persones ; and that no protestation could either be a sufficient warrand of dutie in the brethren to be arraign ed, nor yet anie safetie to the Church, in any time thereafter, in such cases as the revoking of the Appeale : And, therfor, this second advise was taken, for eschewing of the present apparent danger, That the CouncUl should be earnestlie intreated to differre the present proceeding, and to grant a certaine space of time to their brethren then to be accused, to go to their Synodes and Presbyteries, who had sent them in commission, and therfore with out their advise could do notlung in that bussines, upon suretie, that either they should returne answere in the said mater, accord ing to the advyse and resolution of thefr brethren, to the CouncelV contentment, against such a reasonable day as their Honours should appoint, or then against the said day they should enter their persones againe in ward, to be answerable, as now, to the lawes, in any thing they had to accuse them of concerning the said Appeale. And for this effect, by common consent, Mr James MelvUl, Mr Patrick Symson, Mr John CarmicheU, Mr Adam BaUenden, Mr Henry Levingstone, were sent to the CounceU, to shew to the Lords the brethren's present resolution, and humbly to desire a ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 463 further time to them to advise, as said is. Which Commissioners comming before the Lordes, and having humbly thanked them for that favour, that it had pleased them to suffer the persones to be accused to consult with the rest of the brethren in so weightie a mater, and having declared the manifold, grave and weightie reasons, which, for the present, hindered their brethren to revoke their Appeale, notwithstanding any danger that might befaU their persones, they humbly besought their Honours to agrie to a certaine delay upon the forsaid conditions. Which sute the Coun ceU flatUe refused; assuring them that either presenthe they be hoved to revoke their Appeale, or to undergo the triaU and censure of the law. This answere being returned, the Brethren all together humbled themselves before the Lord, and earnestlie recommended that cause and themselves to his government. Immediately after, they were convoyed by the guard to the Townes house, and were brought in before the Lord Justice-Deputie, Sir WiUiam Hart, knight, being assisted at that time in judgement by the Lords of the Privie CounceU foUowing : — The Earle of Montrose, Great Commissioner, and the Earle of Dumfermling, Lord ChanceUer, sett together alone on the heighest bench ; and below, on the Lord Justice his right hand, the Earles of Marre and Dumbarre, the Lordes Glames, Newbotle, Balmerinoch, Lord President, TuUibame, and Blantire, with Sir Robert MelvUl elder, knight ; and on his left hand, the Earle of LinUthgow, the Lords Elphingstone, and his sonne the young Lord Abercorne, the Lord Controller, Holyrudhouse, Whitt- > inghame, Clerkintone, the Lord CoUector and KUsyth. CAP. IX. THE ARRAIGNMENT OF THE MINISTERS BEFORE THE LORD JUSTICE, WITH SUCH PROCEEDINGS AS HAPPENED BEFORE THE CALLING OF THE JURIE. The Lord Justice-Deputie, having declared to the six Ministers 464 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE that they were accused of treason for decUning from the judgment of the King's Privie CounceU, and therefore were to be put to the triaU of a jurie, inquired of them whom they would name to be their advocats. They named Mr Thomas Craige, Mr WUUam Oliphant, Mr Thomas Hope and Mr Thomas Gray, who aU four had promised to pleade for them : but the first two being caUed, and thereafter sent for, appeared not, being forbidden before by the Lord Chanceller; and knowing before, that no pleading or reason whatsoever would stay, the CounceU' from their coflclusion of condemning the Ministers, thought it fitter to obey the said direction of the Lord Chanceller, then to appeare to no purpose. The Lord Justice asking the Ministers againe, If they were con tented to have these two Advocats alone ; they desired him to send for the other two also, since they were in the towne, and had come of purpose to plead for them ; which being done, the messinger returning, reported that they refused to come. Wherupon the Lord Justice, the third time asking them if they were contented with the present Advocats, they answered they were, seeing they could come by no moe. Then, he inquiring at Mr Thomas Hope and Mr Thomas Gray, if they would pleade for the accused minis ters; they desired the Lord Justice, according to the Act of Par liament, to cause the other two that had refused, to appeare with them and pleade, seeing the one was particularUe obUged therto, namelie, Mr Thomas Craig, as being ordinarie Advocat for the Church in aU her causes, having a yearlie pension for that purpose, whereby he caused the ministers to looke for him, and trust their action to him with the rest ; and, therefore, his Lordship ought to<- urge and command them, as said is. The Lord Justice answered, That he would urge no man to pleade, if he were not willing to do it of his own accord ; and therefore wiUed them to answere, E they would plead in the. said cause. They answered, That, seeing the cause was good, and the persones honest, they would do as the Lord should assist them, if his Lordship would give them Ubertie ; Mr Thomas Gray adding, That he would give his life for that cause which they maintained. The Lord Justice, after divers ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 465 drifting answeres,' affirming that he would not hinder them, at length, through their importuning to have a warrand of his per mission, he yielded therto. Then Sir Thomas Hammilton knight, Lord Advocate, accused the ministers for declining treasonablie from the King's royall authoritie, in their Appeale given in before the CounceU. But before we proceide to so ungracious an action, let the Reader first consider the disposition and quaUties of that spirit that penned that booke of " Declaration," pubhshed by the CounceU, in their owne name, who ar not ashamed to affirme, that the Ministers were earnestly intreated by their brethren (permitted, upon their earnest request -to the CounceU, to conferre with them) to come to an humble submission and repentance, as also that their two cheef Advocats refused directlie to pleade for them, for their obstinacie, in that they could not perswade them to the same course of humUitie, wherein they had dealt earnestlie with them. It is true, indeed, that the said lawyers delt with them to that effect, before divers of the ministerie convened at Blacknes the 8th of Januar ; and, likewise, Mr Thomas Hope alone without them the 9th of Januar, before many of the brethren. * Bot all departed satisfied with their reasons when they had heard them, only lamenting the inconvenience quhilk they feared to ensew, in respect of the violent course they persaived to be in hands ; and aU promeissed to be in readines to procuir f for them, allbeit they understood it would avaiU nothing ; and so these two principal! Procurators were stayed therefter be the interdiction -=given be the ChaunceUor contrair to their purpose and intention, haveing come to LinUthgow for no uther earrand bot to procuir f for the Ministers. And, touching their brethrein of the ministrie, it is trew, at thefr comming some wer contrair myndit, and by these the CounseU looked to have reapped some advantage against the persons to be accuissed ; therfor did they willingllie urge them to take their advyse, hoipping that it sould have beme to their effect. Bot the matter being oppened, and the cause cleirly con- * From the place marked at p. 440 to this is not in Swinton's MS. t »'• e. to plead. 2 G 466 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE sidered, there was not one of aU that were present who did not justifie their accused brethrein, and gave their advyse to them to be constant, and did glorifie God for their fideUitie, uprightnes, [ wisdom and constancie in that matter, giveing them the right hand of fellowship, and promeissing to Uve and die with them in the maintenance of that trueth for the quhilk they suffered. Yet nothing could stay the CounseU from their purpose ; and, therfor, the Sex Ministers being brought, as said is, befor the Lord Justice, their indytement was grounded upon the first statute maid in Maij 1584, and upon their Dechnatour forsaid, aUedged to be a manifest violation of the said statute. The substance of the lybeU containing their dittay was as fol- lowes : — " ForsameikUe as be first Act of ParUament halden upon the twentie-two of Maij 1584, it was statute and ordained that his ' Highnes, his aires and successors be themselffes, and their Coun- ceUs, are and in tym comeing saUbe judges competent to aU per sons, his Hienes subjects, of quhatsoever estaite, degrie, functione or condition, quhatsoever they be of spirituaU or temporaU, in aU matters quhairin they or ony of them saU be apprehendit, sum moned or chairged be our said sovereigne Lord and Eis CounseU ; ' and that nane of them quhilk saUbe apprehendit, caUed, or sum moned to the effect forsaid, presume or take upon hand to declyne the judgment of his Hienes, his aires and successours, or their CounseU in the premisses, under the paine of treassoun : Notwith standing quhairof the pannel, &c, being chairged to compeir befor the Lords of Secreit CounseU upon the twentie-four of Octo ber, to have answered for their contemptuous haulding of the AssembUe upon the second day of Juhj preceiding, efter that the Laird of Lawrestoun, his Majestie's Commissioner, had expresshe refuissed, and efter that the PanneU * was charged upon the first j day of Julij, under the paine of horneing at the Mercate Crosse of Aberdein, not to hauld the said Assemblie, and also agahist the will and command of the CounseU, quhilk was notified to the pan- * The viov& pannel throughout the history of this trial means the ministers libelled. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 467 neU be the CounseU, be ane letter direct from them to the pannell, and delyvered be Lawrestoun; and sicklyke Mr John Welshe being chairged to compeir befor the CounseU, to have answered for the contempt of conveining at Aberdeine upon the thrid, fourth, and fyft dayes of Julij therefter, with diverse of the breth rein, and ratifieing of the said AssembUe in contempt of his Ma jestie; they and everie ane of them treasonablie declyned the CounseU, as no wayes judges competent to them, be their Declina tour, givine in and subscryved with their hands, aUbeit the said cause and cognitione therof was competent to the Counsell, being for punishment of ane manifest contempt against his Majestie in haulding of the said AssembUe ; quhUk they no wayes could mis- knowe or pretend ignorance of, m swa farr as it was answered be the Advocat, that their Declinatour ought to be repeUed in respect of the said Act of ParUament, quhairby aU DecUnatours are declared nuU, and the exponners thereof to incurre the paine of treassone ; lykeas, in respect of the said answer and reply, their Declinatour was repeUed ; and yet, notwithstanding, the panneU proponed the rest of their deffences, adhering to their Declinatour efter it was repeUed ; and so be proponeing of the Declinatour and adhering therto efter the same was repeUed, the panneU hes incurred the paine of treasone." The lybeU being red and resaived be the Advocat, the PanneU was desyred to schow quhat they had to say for themselffes, why they -sould not pas to the tryeU of ane Assyse. It was answered, be the Procuratours for the panneU, That they ought not to pas to the JbryeU of ane assyse in respect they wer not summond upon fourtie dayes wairnuig to that effect, as the custome is in matters of treas sone ; and so could not be sufficientlie informed nor instructed in their lawfuU deffences, their dittay and crymes quhairof they are to be accuissed no wayes be[ing] forshowen nor revealled to them ; [which could not agrie with law, which ordaines everie persone that is to be accused to be summoned so many dayes before. But it is most certaine that the accused persones were that same day brought directlie from the prison to the barre, without any sum- 2 g2 468 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE monds executed against them, declaring the crime wherof they were to be accused ; whereof the like practise had never bene used against any subject of whatsoever condition or caUing. *] The Lord Advocat answered, That howsoever the law ordaines that order to be keept with persons unapprehendit, yet quhair the pairtie committers of treason is ki hands and put in waird for the same, he may at any tyme, without citation presentit to the pan neU, be put to ane assyse ; and for this [he] aUedged the practeisse used in the person of [James] Wood, younger of Bonnytoun ; t [and therefore the Lord Justice ought to proceid in putting the ministers to the triaU of a jury, notwithstanding the forsaid aUedg- The Prolocutors for the panneU answered, That the forsaid ex ception could not be relevant against the panneU, in respect aUbeit they wer in hands, yet naither wer they apprehendit nor impris- soned for treasson, bot for the haulding of their AssembUe, quhilk was not, neither could be accompted ane treassonable cryme ; and therfor, seeing the panneU to that day had never bein suspect, sclandered, accuissed, or committed for treasson, the Justice could not proceid against them for the present, [without manifest wrong ; §] the instance of Bonnytoun na wayes agrieing with their caice, he being both committed and apprehendit for ane treasson able fact, and no such practice ever haveing past, that a person aUbeit in hands, and put in waird for ane uther cause, sould ther efter bot citation be accuissed of treasson. Hereupon the Lord Justice commanding the Mmisters and their Advocates (who stood closse by the Lordes on his left hand) to stand backe a little^ that place might be geven to the Lordes to conferre together, the Lord ChanceUer rounded a Uttle whUe with the Lordes on the left hand, and the Lord Justice himselfe with the Lordes on his right hand ; after which the Lord Chan celler and he rounded together ; wherupon he pronounced the In terlocutor, repelling aU that had beene propounded for the minis- * From Gibson's MS. f See Pitcairn's Criminal Trials, vol. ii., p. 340. X From Gibson's MS. § Ibid, ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 469 ters, and declared that they behoved to undergoe the triaU of a jurie, and therefore willed the Advocats to propound what they had to answere to the dictay itselfe. * The answere made by the Advocates for the ministers : First, They aUedged that the Act of ParUament maid in Maij 1584 could no wayes mUitate against the panneU, nor the panneU to incurre this paine of treasson through proponeing of their Declaratour, be caus the said Act of ParUament is only maid for establishing his Majestie's royaU authority over aU persons his Hienes subjects, of quhatsoever estaite, as is manifest be the ruberick and inscriptione of the law. And aUbeit it may appear that the said Act not only incluids all persons, bot also incluids all and quhatsoever matter ; + yet these general words cannot be extendit bot aUanerlie to these matters quhilk appertaines properlie to the jurisdiction of the Secreit CounseU ; for, otherwise, if they be generaUie understood, there might foUow ane great inconvenience, vk., ane confusion of all jurisdiction ; and it would be treason to any person, being con veined for spoiUzie befor the Secreit CounseU, to declyne them and appeall to the Sessione, or being chairged for adullterie, to declyne them and appeaU to the Justice, who is onlie judges competent in criminaU matters. And as there are diverse jurisdictions CivUl, quhilk are supreame, ilk ane of them to their own kynd, so there is ane supreame jurisdiction EcclesiasticaU, quhUk has ane warrand of the Word of God, and is estabUshed be the expresse lawes of this realme ; videlicet, be the Acts of Parliament maid 1579, be ane uther maid in anno 1582, and be the thrid in anno 1592 ; quhilk EcclesiasticaU jurisdiction hes their own propper matters quhilk cannot be propper to the Secreit Counsell to cognosce upon, bot pertains to the EcclesiasticaU judicatories ; of the quhUk nature is the GeneraU Assembhe ; and therefor the panneU, in declyneing of the CounseU, being chaUenged of the lawfuUnes or unlawfuUnes of the GeneraU Assemblie haulden be the panneU, hes done no wrong. * This paragraph is taken from Gibson's MS. It is represented in Swinton's. ojily by two lines. t i. e. Causes. 470 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE And aUbeit it may be answered, That the panneU was conveined for contemptuous haulding of the GeneraU AssembUe against the King's Majestie's chairge, yet it cannot alter the nature and qual- litie of the pannell's DecUnatour, quhilk is only for declyneing of the CounseU, in swa farr as the panneU was chairged upon the un lawfuUnes of the AssembUe; for if they had bein summonded only for the contempter, they would never have used any dechnatour, bot being summoned ex hoc medio, videlicet, upon thefr contempt, to heir and sie their AssembUe decerned unlawfuU, they might law fuUie use their Declinatour, for the action takes its nature from the conclusion, and not ex mediis ; and so the conclussions being eccle siastica} jurisdictionis, viz., of the lawfuUnes or unlawfuUnes of the Assembhe, the haile action most be compted ecclesiasticce jurisdic tionis, suppose * the midst quhairupon they were conveined might appeare to conceme the jurisdiction civiU. And this was maid clear by ane exampUe of ane spoUlzie ; for of ane fact of spoUEie there arysses two actions, namelie, if the pairtie be caUed for restitution of the goods, ane civiU action befor the Lords of Session ; and if the pairtie be caUed for oppression, ane action propper to the Secreit CounseU. To this it was answered, be the Advocat, That the Acts of Par liament maid in anno 1579, and anno 1581, cannot derrogat to this Act 1584, becaus the same is posteriour to them. And as to the nature of the actione quhilk was persewed befor the Lords of the Secreit CounseU against the panneU, the same was maist com petent to them, becaus they are judges not onhe to contempt, bot also to the lawfuUnes or unlawfuUnes of the Assembhe foUowing therupon, quhilk was haulden be the panneU against the wiU of the Commissioner, the King's Majestie's chairges, and the CounseU's missive ; lyk as the Lords of the Secreit CounseU repeUed their Dechnatour. And efter the same was proponed and repeUed, quhairby they could not misknow bot they were judges competent, they adherring to the said Declinatour. Thirdlie, The Advocats aUedged, That the Acts of Parliament * Although. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 471 could not be extendit to the panneU's Declinatour, becaus the in tention and meaning of the law must be cheiflie respected ; bot swa it is, that the words, mearung and intention of the law, are only quhair any pairtie is summoned super inquirendis, m the quhilk caice their is a very good reasone, quhairfor the pairtie who de- clynes sould incurr the paine of treasson, becaus he declyning the King and his CounseU befor he knew the matter laid to his chairge, of what nature or qualUtie it is of, he expones * his per son from his Majestie's royaU authoritie ; quhilk cannot be verified in the panneU's cause, quhair they declyne only the competencie i of the judge, in matters EcclesiasticaU, and no wayes refuisses to submitt their persons to his Majestie's authoritie ; and therfor the said law cannot be extendit against them, speciaUie seeing the same is odious, et odiosa sunt restringenda. And that it is odious it is clear, becaus be the consent of aU the Doctours that is de claired to be odious quhilk is induced t against the common law, and quhairby ane third person is prejudged of his right ; of the quhilk nature this law is, becaus thereby that is maid treassone quhilk, be the common law, the consuetude of the countrey, was not treasson of befor. To this it was answered, be the Advocat, That the words of the law are generalhe to be understood in aU matters, and the pairtie cannot excuisse himselff, becaus he was adverteissed of the nature of the accusatione quhilk was to be layed against him ; but gene- raUie the law comprehends aU causses, and must be extendit to their Declinatour, likeas of befor was decydit against Mr David \Black, minister, be the King's Majestie. Fourthlie, It was aUedged, That suppose the Declinatour might faU within the compas of the law, yet the panneU cannot be count ed traittours, nor the assyse cannot fyle them as treassonable de clyners, becaus the law caUs not declyning treassonable, bot punishes the samen with the paine of treassone. To this it was answered, be the Advocat, That all crymes quhilk are punished with the pain of treasson are treassonable. * Exempts. t Brought in. 472 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE FinaUie, It was aUedged, That this Act of Parliament could no wayes stryke against the panneU to make them to incurre the paine of treasson, becaus the jurisdiction of the Kirk is ane sever- all jurisdictione estabUshed be the Word of God and lawes of the realme, and speciaUie be ane Act of Parliament haulden upon the first day of Junij 1592 ; be the quhilk Act not onUe the Generall Assemblies are ratified and approven, bot also it is expreslie de claired that this Act quhairupon they are accuissed, being the hundreth and twentie-nyne Act of the Parhament, haulden at Edinbroughe, upon the twentie-two day of Maij 1584 yeirs, saU no wayes be prejudiciaU, or derogate any thing to the privUedge God hes granted to the SpirituaU office-bearers in the Kirk anent heads of religione, matters of heresie, excommunication, coUation or de- privatione of the ministers, or sicklyk essentiaU censures, speciaUie groundit and haveing warrand of the Word of God ; and swa the said Act of Parliament is expreshe abrogate in so far as it may touche the GeneraU Assemblies and haulding therof, the samen being ane speciall EcclesiasticaU censure, founded and haveing war rand of the Word of God, and being be the said 1592 ratified and approven, and declaired to be good and lawfuU ; lykas the GeneraU Assemblie is ane EcclesiasticaU censure of the lyke nature with these particulars, quhilks are enumerat in the said Act, because in Generall AssembUes the speciaU things intreatted are concerning heads of religione, matters of heresie and excommunication, coUa tion and deprivation of ministers, et ejusdem est naturae totum, cum suis partibus. To this it was answered, be the Advocat, That the Act 1592 is^ ane exception from the said Act 1584 ; and so the samen affirmes the said law 1584. Bot so it is, that the haulding of ane Generall Assemblie against the command of his Majestie's CounseU aiuE Commissioner, and to the contempt of his Hienes authoritie, is neither a head of religione, matter of heresie, excommunicatione, nor deprivation or collation of a minister, or EcclesiasticaU censure ; therfor the said law must be extendit against the samen, it not being contained in the exception as said is. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 473 These reasons being dited and written in the Lord Justice his bookes, as they were taken at more length from the mouth of the forsaid Advocats, the Lord Justice, after the maner before men tioned, (being strange and uncouth to aU the beholders, that no frie reasoning, grave dehberation, and open voting was used in so weightie a mater,) did hunseEe round with the Lords on his right hand, and the Lord ChanceUer with those on the left hand ; and thereafter having rounded with the Lord ChanceUer alone, being about to pronounce the Interlocutor upon the foresaid reasons, the accused Ministers desired of his Lordship that they might be heard, for the better information of his Lordship and the rest of the Lords, before any Literlocutor were pronounced in that mater ; * and bemg permitted to speak, persaiving that upon the word simpliciter contained in their DecUnatour, occasion was taken be thefr adversaries to misconstruct and caUumniat their proceid ings, as though they had maid a plaine denyaU of their subjec- tione to his Majestie, and of his royaU power and authoritie over them, and did disclaime themselffes altogether from all subjec tion to his Majestie's CounseU, [in any cause whatsoever ; f] ther for, for removeing that pretence from the Justice and Lords of their proceidings, and aU prejudice quhUk by that caUumnie might be fostered in the hearts of any against them, and to make both the Justice and his assessours inexcussable, [as before God, so in the sight of men, J] if they sould proceid against them for that cause, they did explaine and cleirly manifest the trueth of their meaning in their Declinatour, according as they had signified ' their mynd in their supphcation given in befor their Dechnatour. The substance of their explanatione dytted be themselffes and re gistrat in the Justice bookes, was to this effect : — That they were never myndit to refuisse or detract the King's Majestie's royaU authoritie as over all subjects, so over aU these of the ministrie in their persons, guids and gear, bot were ever readie, and there did * From the beginning of the paragraph to this place is from Gibson's MS., being fuller than in Swinton's. t From Gibson's MS. X Ibid. 474 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE in aU humilitie confess the same, and did submitt themselffes therto in aU obedience ; as likwayes to aU uther inferiour judica- tours of the land, and speciaUie to the CounseU, in aU matters quhairin they are appoynted judges over any uther, his Majestie's subjects in the kingdome ; aUbeit in the tlungs that conceme the Kirk of God and jurisdiction therof, and specEUie in the matter quhairupon they were accuissed, they had good reasson and war rand, be the Word of God and lawes of the countrey, to declyne his Hienes CounseU as no wayes judges competent therunto. For as his Majestie does judge aU civiU causses concerning the PoUicie be the advyse of CivUl persons, so his Majestie sould cause Ecclesi asticaU matters to be determined be EcclesiasticaU persons aUaner- Ue ; * declairing the GeneraU AssembUe to be the only lawfuU judge to decerne of the lawfuUnes or unlawfuUnes of the Assem blies of the Kirk, unto the quhilk they did submitt themselffes, and to his Majestie, being present therin, as m tymes past, as ane honorable member of the Kirk of God. The Advocat and Justice persaiving by this declaratione and preceiding reassons, aU that were present to pittie and abhore the rigour and extreamitie used aUreadie against the Ministers without any just cause, [finding the mater so cleare to the consciences of aU men, that there was none how simple soever, that did not evidently perceive the wrong already done to them, t] and that it would be accompted a matter odious to aU men, if any conviction sould pas against them, [or any hurt be done to their persons, J] efter so clear a demonstration of their innocencie, they laboured instanthe with the panneU to perswade them to lift their DecUnatour, that the > process might stay and proceid no further. To the which the Ministers answered, That, as before, so yet stUl they were contented to take backe theE Appeale, if their Honours would annul the Processe deduced against them, and the Act of CounceU made thereon ; otherwise they could not, with a safe conscience, expose themselves and the Church of God, in all times hereafter, to the danger of such a decree as they had pro- * Only. t Rom Gibson's MS. J Ibid. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 475 nounced, so prejudicaU to the kingdome of Christ and frie juris diction of his Church, ordained by God, approved by the lawes, and practised so long with such a blessing in this land; which they behoved to do, if they should deprive themselves and spoile the Church of so lawfuU and necessarie a defence : but they were contented that that exposition of their Appeale should be recorded in the bookes of CounceU, as the verie truth of their mynd and intention in that mater, to make it knowne that they did in nothing, by appealing, derogate to the King's royaU prerogative, or to the lawfuU power and jurisdiction of his Majestie's CounceU over thefr persons. * The Lord Justice upon this answer pronounced his Interloqui tor, repelling aU the reassons used be the Proloouttors for the panneU, ordaineing the Ministers to pas to the tryaU of ane assyise, the conclussion being taken befor their coming there, that quhat soever sould be aUedged, they would have the Ministers convict, and so put their lyves in his Majestie's hands by terrour of that sentence, thinking to bring them unto that submission and con fession quhairto, by no uther travell, they could perswade them. The Justice haveing pronounced this most unjust hiterloquitor, affirmeing that aU the Lords, in ane voyce, had so decerned, the Lord HaUyrudhouse, and Mr John Prestoun, CoUectour, t publict- lie opponed, declairing they had not aU consented to so unjust a sentence, and, therfor, wUled the Justice not to lay that blott them. % The Lord Justice replied, saying, " No, my Lords, ye shaU have your partes in this bussines alse weU as I, and your * names shaU be set thereto, to continue for aU times comming, and beare the burthen thereof with me." The said two Lordes con tinuing to utter their discontentment because their names were * This paragraph is taken from Gibsons's MS., being fuller than in Swinton's. t John Bothwell, Commendator of, and afterwards Lord Holyroodhouse, was one of the Lords of Session ; John Preston of Fentonbarns, afterwards Lord President, was also a Lord of Session, and Collector General of the King's Augmentations. X From this to the words " [Sir Archibald]," in line 5th of Cap. x., is from Gibson's MS. In Swinton's it is represented only by the words, " The Justice, notwithstand ing, proceids to the calling of the assyze or jurie ; videlicet." 476 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE to be noted with that deed, the Lord Chancellor spake to the Lord CoUector, saying, " My Lord, that needeth not." CAP. X. THE JURIE IS CALLED, THE EXHORTATION MADE TO THEM, AND THEIR PROCEEDINGS. Notwithstanding aU the preceiding reasons, the Lord Justice proceedes, no man making any further answere ; and the jurie (the most part whereof, contrarie to the Act of Parhament, had not tiU that present time bene present at the arraignment, nor heard the reasoning) were caUed and sworne ; nameUe, [Sir Archibald] StirUng of Keir ; [John] Livingstoun of Dunnipace ; [James] Shaw of Sachie ; [Thomas] Livingstoun of Pantoun ; [Robert] Livingstoun of Westquarter ; Gavin Home of Johnsclewghe ; [Sir John] Forester of Carden ; [Henry] Stewart of CraighaU ; [Sir George] Home of Broxmouthe ; [Sir Patrick] Home of Poll- wart ; [Sir John] Home of North-Berwick ; [Alexander] Home of Rentoun ; [George] Home of Deanes ; James Gib of Carribber, and Mark Swintoun in Innerkeithen ; of whom * there were some knowen to the Lords to be bis Majestie's rebeUs, as, namehe, [Henry] Stewart of CraighaU; sum to be oppen enemies to the trueth, and of a vyUe and deboshed lyfe, as, namehe, Mark Swin toun ; the rest, with these, for the most pairt utterlie ignoraunt * In Gibson's MS. the reading from this to the end of the paragraph is somewhat different, being as follows : " of whom the Lord Justice reporting verie honestlie, as •- men zealous in religion, and honest in fame and conversation, desired the ministers to shew if they had any thing to say against any of them ; who, without objecting against any, admitted them all, being for the most part altogether unknowne to them ; al though they were desired by some honest men to object against divers of them ; name- lie, against CraighaU and Marke Swintoun, the first being a rebell, the latter being a professed Papist. Yet because these things were unknown to them, and they had no present proofe thereof, they keept silence, and suffered the Lord Justice to proceed. Notwithstanding, some of the jurie being verie desirous to shift themselves from that bussines, (as diverse others had done before, partly by corrupting the Clerke's officers, partly by hasarding to pay the fine,) did object against themselves, after they had hoard the mater laid open by the Lord Advocate, and the speeches uttered by the ministers, as shall be declared afterwards." ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 477 of sic matters, and as unacquaint with the PanneU and their pro-- ceichng, so aUtogether unknowen to the panneU ; so that they could object nothing against them, in respect they knew none of them except Dunnypace and KeE. Besyde the most pairt of them, contrair to the Ew, had bein absent aU the tyme of their reasson- ing, and so ought , not to have bein put upon the inquest of a matter quhilk they had never heard nor knowen. Yet being admitted and sworne, the Advocate declaired to them that the Ministers were panneUed for treasson, in respect of their DecUnatour proponed be them against the CounseU, in the matter of their AssembUe, quhairof the CounseU were judges, most proper- he, according to the expresse law of the countrey, quhairupon they were accuissed, to wit, the first statute of the ParUament haulden upon the twentie-two day of Maij 1584 ; and to prove that they had transgressed that said statute, he produced their Dechnatour, subscryved with their hands, quhUk they denyed not, as also the decreit of the Secreit CounseU, quhairin they had found themselffes judges in that matter, and the chairge aUedged used against them at the Marcat Crosse of Aberdeine, with the extract of their pro ceidings at Aberdeine, quhairby they confessed the ressait of the CounseU's letter; and therefter aUedged that the haUl defences quhilk they had used were heard, discussed and repeUed be the judges, so that there rested nothing to the Jurie to find bot if they had declyned, quhilk he alleged could not be controverted, in respect of their own hand wrytte, confessed and acknowledged be them in judgment ; and therfor protected, seeing the judges had V found the dittayes relevant, and their deffences nothing, that if the Jurie sould acquyt the panneU they sould incurr the paines of willftdl errour, and so endanger their lyfe, lands and gear; and reprotestit in the contrair. To this it was answered be the Procurators for the panneU, That the Assyse sould consider * from the begining'the ground quhair- * In Gibson's MS. this address is in the first person. It commences, " Thereafter Mr Thomas Hope, advocate for the Ministers, replied to the Lord Advocat's speeches as followes : — ' The jurie should consider,' " &c. 478 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE upon the panneU was accuissed, quhUk is ane aUedged DecUnatour proponed, be them against the Secreit CounseU ; and confer the Declinatour with the law quhairupon they were accuissed, to try whither if the samen be sic ane Declinatour as may be com- prehendit within the bounds thereof, or merite to be caUed treas sonable ; for the words of the law makes mention that the caus of the makeing thereof proceids from som contumatious and sedi tious persons quhilk contemptuousUe declyned the King's Ma jestie's authoritie, being accuissed of treassonable and seditious speaches uttered be them, swa that the force of this law must stryke upon the contemners of the King's Majestie's authoritie and declyners thereof. Bot so it is, that there can be no contempt nor treasonable proceiding layed to the chairge of the panneU; for quhat they did m their meitting at Aberdein, it was be ane warrand of the Word of God, and be the privUedges of the Kirk, granted thereto be the lawes of the countrey, and be ane speciaU appoyntment maid be the King's Majestie, with the advyse of the Kirk, appoynting the said day for the meitting of the GeneraU AssembUe ; and in this there could be no contempt argued. And quhairas it is layed to their charge that they proceeded against the King's Majestie's inhibitione and letters directed against them; for purgeing of that matter, they were ever readie, m presence of the CounseU, to reduce and unprove the said chairges as manifest- Ue false; lykas now they would, in presence of God, and the haiU nobilUtie and people conveined, tak upon their consciences that there was never any sic chairges used against them. As to the CounseU's letter, it was in effect obeyed ; only a tyme was ap-* poynted for the nixt AssembUe, and a continuatione was maid to a certaine day. And that was their behaviour in haulding the Assemblie, without [any] contempt of his Majestie. So they thought that no person fearing God sould take upon their soules and consciences to pronounce them guUtie of treasson, who had ever, in aU obedience, behaived themselffes towards his Majestie. And as to the law quhairupon they wer accuissed, the samen could not stryke against them, for diverse reasones declaired to ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 479 the judge, quhUk the Assyse ought to consider ; bot speciaUie in respect of ane posteriour Act of ParUament maid in anno 1592, quhairby the Act in anno 1584, quhairupon they are accuissed, is expresslie dischairged, that the same sould not be extendit to the EcclesiasticaU censures. And quhair it is meaned be my Lord Advocat that aU their defences are aUready repeUed be the judge, and that the assyse hes nothing adoe bot to find that they have declyned : To this there may be ane clear answer maid, for the Assyse hes to judge according to their conscience, whither this DecUnatour proponed be them be sic a Declinatour as may faU within the compas of the law ; and speciaUie the assyse hes to considder that the DecUnatour quhairupon they are accuissed is caUed in the dittay " ane treasonabUe DecUnatour ;" quhilk is no wayes provene, for there is nothing showne nor can be showne to prove this qualUtie of their DecUnatour — that the same is treasson able. And if the samen be not found to be treassonable, the dittay cannot be provene ; for quhairsoever there is a qualUtie annexed to any fact, against the quhilk there is a speciaU paine sett doun, that qualUtie must be proven or the pain cannot be imponed, as is manifest in the act agauist thift m landed men. And therfor the Assyse, as they wUl answer to God, sould judge and decyde in the said matter. To this if was answered, be the Lord Advocat, That it is trew quhair the qualUtie consists in facto, the samen ought to be proven, bot not quhair the samen consists in jure. And it is trew that this qualUtie treassondblle is mduced be the law, &c. * It was subjoyned for the PanneU, That the quaUitie treassonable consists in facto ; vE., to prove ane contempt against his Majestie ; and suppose the law inflicts the paine of treasson, yet it must be upon ane contemptuous and treassonnable DecUnatour ; and it fol- lowes, not that aU that quhilk is punished be paine of treasson is treassonnable. * The reasoning being ended, and the Jurie being readie to be * What follows from this to the paragraph in the next sheet, ending with these words, " and the morrow after to be conveyed to their ward in Blacknes," is mostly printed from Gibson's MS., as being much fuller than the corresponding part in Swinton's. 480 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE put apart and inclosed, the Ministers desired to be heard before their removing ; which was granted by the Lord Justice, desiring them earnestly to be short, seeing the day was spent. So in the name of the rest of the ministers, Mr John Forbes spoke first, in substance as foUowes : — " Ye Knights and Gentlemen that ar chosen on our jurie have need to take heed to yourselves what ye doe in this matter ; there fore yee ought first to understand and consider the cause why this day we ar thus accused, lest, otherwayes, through your igno rance, ye bring our innocent blood upon your heades, which assuredlie the Lord wiU require at your hands, if ye condemne us in this cause. The mater is such as we ar not ashamed thereof, and for the which we ar contented not only to suffer reproach and imprisonment, but (if so it shaU please the Lord) we ar ready by his grace, to seale up the truth therof with the blood that is near est to our hearts. I know that we are by many that understand not the truth of our proceidings [thought] to be wilfuU in refusing to acknowledge an offence against the King for keeping our Assemblie at Aberdene, in regard that it is aUedged, [first,] That we were charged and warned by open proclamation the day preceed ing, to desist from keeping of it, upon the pain of rebeUion ; which charge is given in to the CounceU, as executed against us by the Laird of Laurestoun, and we thereupon outlawed, being neither cited nor heard. Secondly, The letter sent from the CounceU is aUedged against us, to prove our disobedience and contempt of his Highnes authoritie. And, lastly, the letter sent by the Commis sioners of the GeneraU AssembUe to our Presbyteries ; wherein it<- was signified, that it was the King's wUl and pleasure that our Assemblie should be continued. Concerning the aUedged charge, upon paine of outlawing, we here protest, in the sight and presence of the eternaU God, who knowes the secrets of all hearts, that as we shall answere to him in that great day, we never heard nor understood of any such charge, neither did any notice or know ledge thereof come to our eares directlie or indirectlie by Laures toun, his officer or witnes, though still present with us, nor yet ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 481 by any other Uving creature. Yea, we ar persuaded in our con science, and so we hope that your Lordships of his Majestie's CounceU ar also, that it is a manifest falshood and untruth ; neither wUl Laurestoun, the officer or witnes, stand by it if they were strictly examined. Moreover, we oftymes, by our humble petition to your Honours, have offered to reduce and improve the same, but as yet could never be heard, aU our petitions being con- tinuaUy rejected, and still we darre upon the hasard and perUl of our Ufe undertake the same. " Furthermore, to testifie our reverend obedience to his Majestie, the same letters being executed against us personally, the 2d of Julij, when we were assembled, we yeelded humble obedience to the charge without delay, and have sufficient proofes to witnes the same, subscribed by famous Notaries. " Touching the Letter sent from the CounceU, first it was directed on the backe thus : ' To the Brethren of the Ministers convened in the Assemblie at Aberdeen;' and so, by the verie direction, it behov ed us to be Assembled, before it could either be receaved, redde, or answered. SecondUe, it requyred two things ; first, that we should dissolve our present meeting ; secondlie, that we should appoint no time nor place for another AssembUe. In the first we fully satis fied the Laird of Laurestoun, by leaving off the treating of any affaires of our AssembUe at that time. The second was such as neither law, reason, nor conscience could suffer us to obey, in doing whereof we could not have bene answerable to our Presbyteries and Synodes that sent us ; seeing thereby we should have suffered |he diet of our Assemblie to be extinguished, , and so by our deed had deprived the Church of that lawfull established order and custome of appointing the diet, the time and place, of our next meeting, before our breaking up, according to the ordinance both of the Church and of the lawes of the land ; so that, in that point, a necessity was layed upon us, since otherwayes the Church could not have had a Generall Assemblie convened againe, according to the ordinarie custom and manner established and practised hitherto, since the reformation of religion, and so not without evident danger. 2h 482 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE Neverthelesse we did not appoint any new diet before we had first simpliciter offered it to the Laird of Laurestoun to be appointed by him, long or short, as he pleased ; which he obstinathe refused. But put the case that we disobeyed that letter, shaU the not obeying of the CouncelPs privat letter be accounted a matter of rebelhon, and contempt of the King's authoritie ? Looke yee to it, my Lords, if yee wiU suffer such a preparative to take place ; as for us, we can neither esteeme so of it nor by our sUence approve it. " Now, touching the other letter of the Commissioners, as it was in itselfe unlawfuU, requiring a prorogation, without ap pointing of either tyme or place, yet we were nowayes tied con traire to both the lawes of the Church and Kingdome. So although they had appointed both time and place, yet we were nowayes tied by any law or ordinance to obey them in that point ; because, in the GeneraU AssembUe keept at Holyrud house, by a plaine law of the Church, made in his Majestie's presence, and with his consent, aU power of changing or delay ing the diets of the Generall AssembUes was taken from them, and the diets of the Assembhes ordained for aU time comming to be both appointed and keeped according to the order set downe in the Act of Parhament. This law, agriable to that law of his Majestie's Parhament, was a more authenticke signification to us in that mater of his Majestie's wiU, contrarie to the naked assertion of that privat letter, then the said assertion contrarie to that law made by the King's consent. But although such a mater might be counted disobedience to the King, we ought neither to be ac cused nor convicted of disobedience to his Majestie ; but seeing their letters were directed to our Presbyteries, and not particularly to us, they are bound to answere to it, and not we, who went not but through their direction and commandment, whom it behoved* us to obey. And as for our meeting in Aberdene at that time, we are able to produce their letter subscribed by the Laird of Laures toun and Mr Patrick GaUoway, appointing that same day and place for that meeting to us ; so that there is no cause whereby we can be justly taxed of. disobedience for that meeting. But the truth ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 483 is, I sie we must beare the punishment of the iniquitie of the Com missioners of the Generall Assemblie, who through their naughtie devises and crooked courses, in seeking to subvert the libertie and lawfuU jurisdictions of the kingdome and Church of Christ, and to bring in againe the antichristian tyrannie of the Romish Hierarchie, by pubhke profession, subscription and oath hitherto abjured by themselves, as contrarie to the Word of God and practise of the apostles, have hereby brought aU this trouble unto the Church of God, and are the authors and procurers of whatsoever vexation and trouble we have sustauied ; upon whom we may justly lay the blame of all that hitherto we have or hereafter shaU suffer in this cause. So we referre to your judgment, what a strange thing this is, that We, who are taken in no iniquitie, whose doing can be condemned by no law, and who are found to keepe ourselves within the compasse of our calling, exercising the ordinarie points thereof, according to God's Word, the ordinances of the Church and lawes of the land, according to the ordinarie and accustomed practise, observed since the beginning of the Reformation, that We, I say, in this case, should be esteemed and reputed to be the cause of aU these evUs ; whereas, in verie truth, it is they who, for the maintaining of their iniquitie, still incensing and stirring up the King against us, and, through their policie, intending to bring him to be a furtherer of their purpose, have bene and stiU are the fountaine out of the which do flow aU the troubles. 1 " And now to the end that yee that are of the Jurie may know how neare this mater toucheth you alse weU as us, I desire you to take heed to the Confession of Faith, which each one of you hath subscribed, and to the Oath, which therein each one of you hath made, by the great name of your God, to maintaine the same Discipline of this Church, for the which we ar ac cused. The words ar these, which I reade to you out of this printed Confession for your better information : " To the which (meaning the Reformed Church) we joyne ourselves wilUnglie in doctrine, faith, religion, discipline, and use of holy Sacraments, as livelie members of the same in Christ our Head, promising and 2 h 2 484 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE swearing, by the great name of the Lord our God, that we shaU continew in the doctrine and discipUne of this Church, and shah defend the same, according to our vocation and power, all the dayes of our Ufe, upon the paine contained in the law, and danger both of body and soule in the day of God's fearfuU judgement." Consider now, I pray you, these wordes, sworne and subscribed both by you and us ; let this first teach you what a necessitie is first layed on us, not only to practise, but, also, with the verie hasard of our lives, to stand to the maintenence and defence of this Discipline, for the which we ar this day accused. And, nixt, I wish you to take heed in what estate you stand in judging of us, if this day yee condemne us for defending that which yee your selves, upon so great paine, ar obliged to defend, for the profes sion and maintenance whereof both yee and we ar so weU war- randed by the Word of God and lawes of the land ; that as for us, our lives in this case ar not deare to us, although yee should con demne us, since, in our Appeale, which in this mater we have used, we have done nothing in the smaUest iote which may de rogate to the King's royal prerogative, or which is contrarie to the lawes of the kingdome and practise of the Church before in Ms Majestie's owne presence ; having alwayes submitted ourselves in aU things civill to his Majestie's CounceU, as our petition given in before our Appeale to the CounceU evidentUe witnesseth, which here I give you to reade, together with our present declaration made of our mind in that mater, to remove aU scruple that might arise in the hearts of any upon the wordes of our Appeale, which hitherto have [been] interpreted amisse by such as have sought^ by all meanes, to involve us in some guUtines, to make the pro ceedings against us to have some appearance of justice and equi- tie, so [as] to bring us and our cause in hatred and detestation.' And, therefore, I charge you, in the sight of God, that yee judge < of us this day as yee would wish him to judge of you in that great day, when yee shall render an account to Him of this your Oath." * * This speech of Forbes, as given in Gibson's MS., contains some passages not in Swinton's MS., while the latter contains some passages which are not in ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 485 To this Speech nothing was replied by any persone ; only the Lord Advocat layed hold on one point, wherein it was aUedged, that by humble petition to the CounceU, they had offered to re duce and disprove the execution given in against them by Lau restoun, and that they were never heard nor admitted ; against which the Lord Advocat affirmed, that they never heard any such thing, and if they had been purposed to do so, they should have made sute to him in that mater, as a thing belonging to his office. To whom the Ministers answered, That he could not be ignorant, neither yet the rest of the CounceU of their petition ; first, in re spect of the bUl given in by them to the CounceU for that effect, he being present there that day when Mr John Forbes was first committed. to the Castle of Edenburgh. Secondlie, Because that same point was set downe as one of their reasons, in the answere given in by them by way of declaratione to the lybeU persewed against them the 24th of October ; aU which answeres, and that especiaUy among the rest, were openly redde, at that same time, before the whole Councell, in his Lordship's hearing ; unto the which, neither then nor before, nor yet thereafter, could they ever receive any answere from the CounceU, or from his Honour, Touching the order and forme keept in making sute to his Lord ship in such matters they professe their ignorance. Howsoever it be, they had petitioned to the Councell, where he was present, and one of the number. After this, the accused Ministers being demanded by the Lord Justice if they had any more to say, Mr John WeEh addressed his speech to the Jurie, in maner foUowing : — " As we are unknown to you so are yee to us ; for there are manie of you whose faces we never saw before. Neverthelesse we are your brethren in Christ, professing the same faith, in communion of the same GospeU, and although our persones are not to be regarded much, yet, notwith- Gibson's. Swinton's copy of it will be given in the notice of Forbes' Life prefixed to this volume, to which the Reader, who may wish to compare the two versions of it together, is referred. 486 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE standing, we are the servants and ambassadours of the great God, howsoever men esteeme of us ; and that which shaU be done to us he shaU account it as done to himselfe, and therefore we say to you, as Jeremie said to the Princes, when he was standing before them, accused by the Priests and Prophets as we are this day, " Behold we are in your handes this day, do with us as it shaU please our God to direct you : but know for a certaintie, that if ye condemne us, ye shaU bring innocent blood upon yourselves and the whole land : for of a truth the Lord did send us, and there is no unrighteousnes in our hands. " As for the mater wherof we are to be accused, and yee are to be our judges this day, we are fully resolved of it that it is the undoubted truth of God, and belongs essentiaUy to Christ's croune and kingdome; and, therefore, we have come forth this morning with greater joy and gladnes to this . tribunaU then ever we did when we went to eate and drink, being hungry and thirstie, and through the Lordes grace are resolved to seale it up with the testimonie of our blood, if it shall please Em to caU us thereto. And this our resolution is neither yesterday nor the day ; for these twenty-four weekes imprisonment of us might have given us leasure to consider the weight and heavines thereof. So that howsoever many men think it to be but an indif ferent mater, yet it is not so in our consciences, but contrariwise a maine and essentiaU point of Christ's kingdome ; it being one of his royaU prerogatives to be supreme judge in aU EcclesiasticaU and spirituaU affaires, which are matters belonging to his king- dome, the outward administration whereof he exerciseth in and ' by his Church only ; so that as we have our offices and callings only of him in his Church and by the ordinance thereof, so should we be judged in the duties of our EcclesiasticaU offices onlie by him, and under him by the EcclesiasticaU Courts of his Churchr And lUse as Councells, Parliaments, and aU CiviU courts belong to the RoyaU croune of a worldlie kingdome, so do aU the Ecclesiasti caU Assemblies and Conventions of the Church (whereof our Ge neraU Assemblie is one of the cheefest,) belong to Christ's spiritu al! kingdome ; and, therefore, the judging of the lawfulnes or ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 487 unlawfulnes of them belongs unto Christ by his Church. Now, therefore, since that posterior Act of Parliament 1592, which dero gates to the former of the yeare 1584, speciaU exception being made both of heades of religion and essentiaU EcclesiasticaU cen sures of the Church warranded by the Word of God, under which this mater whereof we ar accussed is easilie comprehended, — the souvereigntie of Christ in judging all the affaires of his spirituaU kingdome, as an essentiaU part of his royaU dignitie, being an especEU head of rehgion, and the lawfulnes or unlawfulnes of our Assembhes, whereof our Generall Assembhes ar the cheef, war randed by the Word, and having bene used and practised long before there was a civill law made for the approbation thereof, being an essential Ecclesiastial censure ; it is most evident, that we cannot justlie be accounted guUtie of treason for declining from the Councel's judgement in that point, it being so clearlie excepted in this latter Act, which derogates to the former. And, moreover, this is no new thing which we have done, neither ar we only of this mind : for an Appeale was given in before this to the Councell by the Church, subscribed by almost 400 ministers, and among them some Bishopes and Commissioners, who ar the fountane of aU our troubles, and of all the evils of God's Church within this land, upon whom here we lay the cheefe blame of aU our trouble that hath or shaU come to us or the Church of God within this land ; even they, we say, have subscribed that Appeale, and their hand-writtes are yet stiU extant, to testifie their approbation of us in doing no other thing, by our appeaUing from the CounceU, „then that which hath bene done by themselves before. But there is one thing which cheeflie I would have you to consider, name- lie, that which our Brother spake to you before, touching that solemne Oath whereby yee are aU bound, upon the paine of eternaU damnation, to maintaine the present Discipline of this Church. The wordes that containe your oath ye have heard redde to you before. This not only yee that ar on our Jurie, but the King himselfe, and yee my Lords of the Privie Councell, and all the Estates of the land have sworne and subscribed. Seeing, therefore, that our 488 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE Generall AssembUes, and judging of the lawfulnes and unEwftdnes of them, is a part of that Discipline which yee all and we ar sworne to defend upon the paine of endlesse damnation ; we now, there fore, testifie unto you, in the sight of God and of his elected angels, that yee ought to beware that yee breake not that solemne Oath, and so bring upon yourselves both that guUtines and the guUtines of our innocent blood." This speech being 'ended, the hearts of the Jurie and aU that were present being much moved, the Lord Advocat spake to the Jurie againe, saying, that it was needles to make answere to aU those things that were spoken, neither ought they to be moved with such wind ; and so beganne to discourse of the King's wisdom, equitie, justice, clemencie and long patience at aU times, in his proceedings with the Church, and especiaUy with these that were accused, in his wUlingnes to have pardoned their offence, upon their humble petition and submission; and, thereafter, praised much the Councel's lenitie and courtesie towards them, in waiting so long for the space of twelve or threttene weeks for their better resolution, and now, even at the last point, in offering to them this libertie to passe from their Appeale ; and hereon did greathe aggravate their disobedience to the King, — willing the Jurie there fore to take heed, not to their speeches, but to their obedience and dutie to his Highnes in this mater, which now they had in hand, wherein they had no more to do but to see if the Ministers had appealed or not, seeing the Lord Justice and the Lords his assessors had already refuted aU their defences, and found them to have incurred the paine of treason, if the Jurie should try and find' that they had appeaUed, which they eould not but find, in regard of their subscribed Appeale, which there he produced againe, pro testing againe that he would call them in question for wilfuU errour, if they did not convict them, whereby their Uves, lands, and goods would aU faU in the King's handes. To this discourse it was answered by Mr John Forbes for the PanneU : — " We do heartilie praise the Lord for his manifold bless ings bestowed on him, neither can we bkme his Majestie as others ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 489 for the wrong we have suffered. And how innocent we ar of these calumnies that ar layed against us, touching the contempt of his authority and disobeying of his commandment, we beUeve that it is manifest to aU men by our former speeches. The lenitie shewed by your Lordships of the CounceU to us may easUy be seene and considered by our twenty-four weeks imprisonment without any just cause, being the King's free subjects, and the servants of the living God ; through the continuaU rejecting of all our humble petitions, and refusing to do so much as looke on our bihs ; and through our closse keeping, oftymes so strictly, that we were excluded from all fellowship and societie, one of another, amongst ourselves, and of aU other living creatures, by your Honours speciaU direction concerning us, that so we might be left utterly destitute of comfort : after which maner, none of the most hainous malefactors within this land have ever bene handled before. Yet we do rejoice herein, and ar ready, by the assistance of God, to endure the uttermost extremitie that can be used against us, hoping in God, that in this cause for the truth, your Lordships shaU sooner be tyred with afflicting then we with suffering. But because [by] your not weighing gravehe enough the words of the Oath and solemne Covenant, [you] go about by fair speeches and coloured pretences to draw on this guUtines upon the jurie, whereof we have given them warning ; that your Honours may know, that both yee should be free from any such entisements, under whatso ever colour, contrarie to the said Covenant, and they from being in- tised in so weightie a mater, which standes then upon no lesse then salvation and condemnation both of body and soule, upon any pretence to violate their Oath, I wiU read to your Lordships and them that part of the said Confession and Covenant which cleareth the dutie of aU that have subscribed it in such maters : " And, seeing that many ar stirred up by Satan and that Roman Anti christ, to promeisse, sweare, subscryve, and for a tyme use the holy sacraments in the Kirk deceitfuUie against their own con science, mynding heirby, first, under the externaU cloke of reli gion to corrupt and subvert secretly God's trew religion within 490 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE the Kirk, and efterward, quhen tyme may serve, to become open enemies and persecutours of the same, under vaine hope of Popish dispensation, devysed against the Word of God, to his greatter confusion and their double condemnation in the day of the Lord Jesus : We, therfore, wUhng to tak away aU suspitione of hypo- crisie, and of sic double deaUing with God and his Kirk, protest, and caU the Searcher of aU hearts for witness, that our mynds and hearts doe wUlinglie agrie to this our confession, promeiss, oath and subscriptione ; so that we are not moved for any worldly respects, bot are perswadit only in our conscience, through the knowledge and love of God's trew rehgione imprinted in our hearts be the Holy Spirit, as we saU answer to him in that day quhen the secreit of aU hearts saU be disclossed. And, forsameikUe as the outward profession of religion and subscription therof is not sufficient, except that our conversation and behaviour be agreeable therto : Therfor we and every ane of us promeisses faithfuUie to behaive ourselffes as trew professours of this gospeU in every respect, so that, neither in pubhc nor in private, directlie nor indi- rectlie, we saU impugne the veritie thereof be word or wrytte, bot saU, be all meanes, maintaine and defend the samen, both in reas- soning and utherwayes, so far as God wiU give us grace." — These words I exhort your Honours, and you Knights and Gentlemen of the Jurie, to weigh and consider that yee jest not with God in a mater of so great moment." Thereafter Mr John Forbes directed his speech to the Earl of Dunbarre as foUowes : — " My Lord, Since you ar in favour with the King, and I am persuaded your Lordship loves his peace and , welfaire ; being bound by many obligations to do the same, as ye also my Lords that ar here, there is an historie which I remember, and would intreat your Honours to relate it to his Majestie, seeing that I know not if ever I shall have the occasion hereafter to spcake to him myselfe. Therefore, as my last dutie, I beseech your Honours to give his Highnes this warning, that he may eshew the inconvenience. The mater is this : In the 9th of Joshua, when the people of Israel had entered into the land of Canaan, the ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 491 Gibeonites, which were of the people appointed by God to be destroyed, wrought craftily, putting old sakes upon their asses, old bottles rent and bound up, with old clowted shoes on their feet, and old rayment on them, with dried and moldie bread ; came to Joshua, and faining themselves to have come from a verie farre countrey, persuaded Joshua and the Princes to make a covenant of peace with them, not consulting with the mouth of the Lord. Thrie dayes after, the people, understanding that they dwelt in the land, would have destroyed them ; but the Princes of the Congre gation hindered them, affirming that they might not touch them, because they had sworne to them by the Lord God of Israel. Many yeares thereafter Saul sought to slay them, for his zeale towards the chUdren of Israel and Judah ; for the which cause, after the death of Saul, and renting of the kingdome from him and his posteritie, the Lord sent three yeares famine in the land in the dayes of David ; who asking counseU of the Lord, He answered him that it was for Saul and his bloody house, because he slew the Gibeonities. Therefore, at the request of the said people, David delivered seven of the house of Saul into their hands, who were hanged up before the sunne, and so the Lord was pacified, and his judgment ceased. Now, my Lord, I beseech you in the name of God to declare this to his Majestie, that his throne and posteritie may be keeped blameles in this point, and so be free from the wrath which otherwayes must needes foUow ; for if such a fearefull judgement feU upon Said and upon his house, after that he was slaine and the kingdome taken from his posteritie, and upon the whole kingdome of Israel, for breaking the oath and covenant made by Joshua and the people so many hundreth yeares before, with such as they should have had no peace [with,] being of the people appointed by God for utter destruction, and likewise pro cured and purchased through fraud and deceit by the Gibeonites, assuredlie the heavie wrath and judgement of God shaU light upon his Highnes, his posteritie, upon you aU, my Lords, your houses and posteritie, and upon the whole land and kingdome, if the King be induced, (as the Lord forbidde,) or your Lordships 492 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE and this land consent, or suffer that solemne Oath and Covenant to be broken, which is made with God himselfe, professed, subscribed and sworne to by his Majestie himseffe and your Honours, everie one that is here this day, and the whole body of this land, and that by the great name of the Lord your God, upon no less paine then eternal damnation of body and soule, in the day of his fearfuU judgement. And therefore, I exhort you, My Lord, to shew his Majestie this from me, as my last will, as from one that wisheth him weU, and good and peace to him in the Lord. And I pray you that ar here, to take heed to yourselves this day that yee do nothing against the truth of God, and this discipline of the Church, which, by the said Covenant yee obhged yourselves to defend, according to your power, aU the dayes of your lives." Their speaches endit, Mr Robert Durie, in name of the rest, and in his own name, spake to the Lord Justice and whole Assem blie, that seeing there was sufficient testimonie given them if they lyked to considder it, they would add no more ; bot they all approved and ratified that quhilk was spoken as aU their mynds and meanings. >NWe cannot heir pass in sUence the strange and diverse effjjefs that^fekE speeches did work in the heads of aU the beholde^S; sum witnessingMheir detestation of so peart and schamelegs^niquitie in the CounseU, Js^tice and Commissioners, be tile indignation of their countenance ; ushers manifesting thpk^pittie and just com miseration of the most ufrjust sufferings of the panneU by their teares ; bot most of all, the Ju^s^T and speciaU Counsellors utter ing the astonishment of theis'neart isJSjE horrour of their conscience by the confusion of fEeir faces ; and EsOsfi all, the Jurie, aUbeit diverse of theni^fere brought there of purjJssge to convict the PanneU, noi^ithstanding of any defence that soiS^^be maid ho the cojj^Taire, yet did they declair how farr their heartsNljd -scan tp» cd himself in generall onely as n wcllwillcr, desirous to doc all that lay in his power ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 503 from aU speaking against the said proceedings, promising that aU things should turne to the best, and be ordered without prejudice of the Church, or the persones of their brethren that were found guiltie. And, therefore, he sent for Mr James MelviU, partlie for the same purpose, and partly to imploy his travels to persuade his brethren in Blaknes, now after their guUtines, to submit them selves to the King's wUl and to receive his pardon. Touching this last point Mr James Melvill refused to medle therewith, as knowing the brethren's mind to be, rather to suffer whatsoever ex- tremitie, then either by submission or accepting of pardon to approve their unjust conviction. As for the other point, they aU refused simply to be sUent ; yet promised to be somewhat more sparing of their speaches then necessitie could well permit, tiU they had seene the effect of his Honour's travels and promise. About the 26th day of January, an answere was sent from the King to the CounceU, touching the doome to be pronounced against the guUtie Ministers, commanding them likewise to proceed against the rest of the Ministers warded in other places, by putting them also to the triaU of an inquest. Which direction was keept closse by the Councell, which, with aU dihgence, wrote backe againe to his Highnes, shewing to him the trouble and commotion that ap- pearantlie would arise, if severitie were used against the persones convicted, as likewise what difficultie there would be to convict the rest. And, therefore, they intreated his Highnes to shew some favour to them that were already convicted, and to delay the triaU of the rest, * lest that which was wonne already in the former should be lost againe, if the rest were absolved. for their relief; and offered, if they would write any thing for clearing their innocency to his Majestie, both to carry it, present it, and promove then- suit to the outermost ; [and] in the mean time did imparte secretly his errand to Mr John Forbes. The Ministers, glade of so fair ane occasion offered to make his Majestie acquaint with the truth of their cause, did write ane common Letter direct from them aU that were in waird to his Majestie, the tennour followes :" &c. — See this Letter at p. 508. * The trial of the rest, consisting of eight ministers, never took place. They " were released from prison ; but they were banished singly to the extremities of the High lands, to the Western Isles, Orkney and Shetland ; and in these inclement aud bar barous abodes, several of them contracted diseases which huiried them to a premature grave." M'Crie's Life of Melville, vol. ii. p. 207. 504 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE The King wrote backe againe to them, desiring some of the Councell to come to him ; namehe, the Earle of Dumbarre, the Lord Controller, and Lord Advocat ; having consented that the arraign ment of the rest of the Ministers should be> delayed tiU he had spoken with them, and declaring that he could [not] shew mercie to those that, stUl justifying themselves, would not humbly begge the same at his hands, but that he would stiU delay the pronounc ing of the doome tiU the rest were likewise made guUtie, that so it might be pronounced at once against them aU. In the meane time he willed the CounceU, by proclamation, upon aU heighest paines, to put to silence the pulpits in that mater, for hindering of such trouble as they aUedged was like to arise. Upon the 29th day of January, Mr John Knox, minister at Mewrose, [Melrose], was sent in commission from the late Commis sioners of the GeneraU AssembUe then assembled at Edinburgh, to the Ministers in Blaknes, to propound these four things foUowing to them, and to report their answere : First, What reason had they for them to lay the blame and cause of their trouble and suffering upon the foresaid Commissioners ? Secondlie, To inquire if they had busied themselves, as it was reported, to procure the subscriptions of aU the Presbyteries to their Appeale, to strengthen their cause ; Thirdly, To desire them to declare what gentleman had affirmed that the King had excused himselfe for refusing his sute, request ing for the releasing of some of them, by reason of his oath and promise given to some of the Commissioners, not to do it without their consent ; and, Lastly, To inquire of them if they would cor rect the declaration of their Appeale, by leaving out member of the » Church, meaning of the King. The answer sent by Mr John Knox to the foresaid late Com missioners was this in substance : — To the first, they thought it not expedient to enter in question herein with their brethren, seeing there was alwayes some advantage taken of aU their speeches against themselves and to their damage ; and since their present estate required that their mindes should be exercised in preparing themselves for such an issue of their trouble, as the late proceeding ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 505 of the Lord Justice and the Lords against them gave them just cause to expect, rather then to enter into any fruitles and unpro fitable contestation with their brethren ; being alwayes ready, if God of his mercy should offer such an occasion, in love and charitie to communicate their griefes mutually before their brethren, who might be able to judge equitably of both their proceedings. Touch ing the Second, They doubted not but their doings and actions were carefuUy eneugh watched and looked on ; neither did they looke for any favour in. any thing whereof they might be questioned : therefore, as they were not to be their owne accusers, so they were ready to answere to any thing that any other had to lay against them, howbeit they thought that their brethren might have bene more then sufficiently satisfied with the trouble and griefe that was already brought upon them. As for the Third, They were nowayes minded to accuse any man for any private speech ; but for the truth of the mater, there" were some of the late Com missioners sitting among them, to whom that gentleman had told that mater at his returning home, and had rebuked them for their iniquitie therein, whom they desired to sound the deepth of their owne consciences, to try the veritie thereof. Concerning the Fourth and last, They had given their declaration of their Appeale before the Lord Justice, in their opinion according to good conscience, and to the full contentment of all sincere Christian hearts ; to the which they did stand, being alwayes readyto reforme anything there in, when their brethren should, by cleare evidence of God's truth and good reason, make them sie any iniquitie, errour, or just of fence given thereby. This answere, in substance, being delivered by Mr John Knox to the Moderator of the late Commissioners, they wiUed him to give it in writ ; which he, refusing, because he had caried no writing from them, they without any more ado broke up. Upon the tenth of Februar, the Earle of Dumbarre, prevailing nothing with the King by writing, took journey to Court. The whole Synods being convened in this moneth, according to the forsaid warning, made by Mr Patrick Galloway, there were two Commissioners directed by the King to each one of them : the 506 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE one being a Barron or Knight, the other a Bishop or Commissioner of the Church ; without any instruction, or any thing touching the Parliament, (although in Mr Patrick GaUoway his letter that was pretended to be the cause of the meeting,) but only demanding their approbation and consent to the five foresaid Articles sent home by the King. Which Articles being censured, as they de served, by the most part of the Synods, as tending to the over throw of the present government and disciphne of the Church, established by the Word of God, they were aU referred to the GeneraU Assemblie as being the SpirituaU Court, which only had power to answere and discusse such things as concerned the Church in common within this land. These Articles removed aU scruple out of men's hearts touching the intention of the Bishopes and Commissioners, and wakened the brethrein of the ministrie out of their securitie ; finding plainhe that the delay and let of the Generall Assemblie proceeded from their purposing to have the jurisdiction estabhshed in the per sones of Bishopes and Commissioners as their forerunners, who also were shortly thereafter revealed to be the authors, writers, and senders of the first four articles to the King, who added the fifth himselffe, for his owne purpose, the other four only concern ing the Bishopes and Commissioners. Upon the 19th of Februar, Mr WiUiam Scot, Mr John Car- michell, and Mr Wilham Murray, went with a warrand from the CounceU in commission to the CasteU of Blakness, from the Lord Controller, who shortlie thereafter was to take journey towards his Majestie, desiring the imprisoned Ministers there to send the meaning of their mind touching their proceedings, so farre as they could or might yeeld, in such forme as might best pacifie his Majestie's wrath, promising to imploy his endeavours for their reliefe. The imprisoned Ministers, finding it no wayes expedient to give out any thing authentickhe as their mind, after conference with their foresaid Brethren, gave to them in writ a minut of their mind unsubscribed, to serve only for helping of their memorie in that mater ; the substance whereof foUoweth : — ESTATE OE THE KIRK. 507 " Forasmuch as by our proceedings in that meeting at Aber dene, the first Tuesday of Julie last, and by the proponing of an Appeale in the processe persewed against us for the same, we may be interpreted to be contentious, and contemners of authoritie, which crimes, God knowes, we detest from our hearts as heighest abominations, not onUe in persones of our caUing, but in aU that live under Christian princes ; declaring herefore, before God and his angels, that our intention in that mater was honest, together with our whole doings and proceedings, howsoever with infirmities, in the measure of knowledge that God hath given us, lawfuU, sincere and upright ; and by that Appeale we neither had nor have intention or meaning to eschew, refuse, or any wayes to exeme ourselves from any triaU ordained by God, and practised in this kingdome under our dread Sovereigne ; but we most humbly at aU times offered, and offer ourselves to be tried and judged in aU CiviU and Criminall maters, wherein we ar or may be accused, accor ding to the order practised upon others, his Majestie's subjects, by the ordinarie judges, and in EcclesiasticaU matters by the Church, and the SpirituaU judges thereof. Neither do we wholly decline from his Majestie's judgement in such maters, but in this our bussines submit ourselves in all humUitie, and are contented to be judged by his Majestie and the Generall Assemblie, his Majestie being there present, according to the order practised since the reformation of religion within this kingdome. And we confesse that we ar sorie, from the bottome of our hearts, that by us or our proceedings his Majestie should be any wayes grieved or offended. And for appeasing of his Majestie's wrath, in aU humble submission, upon our knees we begge his Highness his favour and woonted clemencie, commonlie shewed to aU distressed subjects, to be ex tended towards us." Upon the 22d of Februar, the Lord ControUer tooke journey towards Court; upon which day also Mr WiUiam Irving, the King's servant, being secreitlie directed by his Majestie, after that he had bene in Stirling and Downe, went to Blaknes, and there conferred with the Ministers for obtaining their owne hand-writ 508 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE directed to his Majestie, both for clearing their cause and appeas ing his Majestie's wrath, promising faithftdly to deUver it to the King, and to further their peace according to his power. The Ministers, after mutuaU communication of their minds, in their severall wards, thinking it fit to imbrace the present occa sion and opportunitie, which hitherto had never been offered to them in so sure a maner, to acquaint his Majestie with the truth of their cause, did write this letter following, for the foresaid pur pose, and sent it subscribed with aU their hands, with the said Mr William Irving, who tooke his journey backe againe the 27th of February. The letter sent to the King is as foUowes : — " Please your Sacred Majestie, " The zeal of this bearer to your Majestie's honour and service, and confidence in your Highnesse's favour, have emboldened us to write to your Majestie, in hope that the simple truth, joyned with humility and humblenesse of heart accompanying the truth, having manifested our hid and yet harmlesse innocency to your High nesse's minde, by grace godly, by nature wise, by office just, shall . baith deliver your Majestie's heart frae aU prejudice imprented be misreports, and purchase to us the benefeit of your Highnesse's clemency, whilk hitherto hes beine restrained not be any offence justly ministered by us, but by policy imposed upon us, and obtrud ed to your Majestie ; our proceedings first and last, being [so farre from contempt of your Majestie's authoritie, that though we were sent with commission to that meeting at Aberdene, *] yet upon the signification of your Highnesse's pleasure be the Laird of Laurestoun, we delayed aU things, although no charge being exe cuted against us, nor intimation made to us ; having offered oftimes to the Lords of your Highnesse's Secret CounseU to have reduced their pretendit execution, aUedged indorsat against us, but we were never heai-d nor admitted. The motives whilk caused us appoint ane new day we referr them to your Majestie's vvise con- * From Gibson's MS. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 509 sideration ; being moved thereto, first be necessity of order, and next be your Highnesse's Commissioner not only refuissing to nomi nate himself ane day long or short as he. pleased, it being simply referred to him be us, but also plainly signifying that he looked we were never to obtain any GeneraU Assemblie again, and yet in end yeakUng thus farr that we had reasone to designe ane new day, albeit he could not consent thereto himself, as having neither credeit nor commission to that effect. And as we did nothing in contempt, so have we abstained fra obstinat and wUfuU defence of our doings, ever refuissing to judge thereof ourselves, we being the actors, and humbly submitting ourselves to the tryal of others, namely, to the Generall AssembUe. Notwithstanding, we were so unwilling to use any dechnation of the CounseU therein, that we did forbear tiU aU other means of supphcation and humble suit was rejected, and so we compelled thereto against our wiU, for pre serving of that order, appointed be God and approved be your Majestie, touching the distinction of the SpirituaU and CivUl judi catories, as our Supplication given in to the Counsell before our "Declinatour will declare ; whilk we have sent to your Majestie. Neither did we this to exeim ourselves fra any lawfuU tryeU in any thing civUl or criminaU wherin we ar or may be apprehended be the Ordinar judges appointed in sic matters, and practised upon uthers your Majestie's subjects. Neither concerned our Dechna tour your Majestie's self, but your Highnesse's CounceU ; neither the CounceU simpliciter, but in that and sic matters SpirituaU allen- narly, * sic as is the lawfulnesse or unlawfulnesse of ane GeneraU Assemblie ; and so (as your Majestie knowes) to be judged be ane spirituaU and not by a civiU judicatory. Your Highnesse's autho ritie over us we never declined, knowing and acknowledging your Highnesse our only Sovereigne Lord, under and in God, and from God, in aU things belonging to this life ; so that whosoever resists your Highnesse's authority or contemnes the samen, he contemnes the ordinance of God, and bringes condemna tion upon himself. And, farder, with great consolation, giving * Only. 510 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE thanks to God, who hes honoured your Highnesse with the con fession of his truth, and so hes caUed your Majestie to be ane honourable ruler * of his Kirk, whilk is his body ; we not only reverence your Highnesse as a nourishing father of his Kirk, whoes royaU power should be employed to the mentenance thereof, in peace and purity both of the doctrine and discipUne, according to the order prescribed be Jesus Christ, her only Lord, Head and King in his Word, in repairing whatsoever is decayed in the trew worship of God, in repressing aU contrary worship, and punishing aU, baith contemners and negligent, in whatsoever the Lord hes concreddeit, f being breakers J utriusque Tabulce ; but also, in respect foresaid, were; and are stUl willing, in aU humility, to be judged in this matter according to the order whilk hes bein observed and practised be your Majestie in the Kirk, for § reformation of reli gione, in the GeneraU Assemblyes thereof, whereunto your Majes tie hes oftentimes sitten, being personaUy present, or otherwise, be your Highnesse's Commissioner : so that, in decUning the CounseU, and betaking us to the GeneraU Assemblie, we did in no wayes declyne your Majestie, || neither meanes to doe so, but in humility submits ourselves to your Majestie and the said Assemblie, as said is, humbly intreating your Majestie and the said Assembhe, to consider heerof, and to have pity and compassion on us, who have bein thir seven or eight moneths restrained from the public service of our God in his Kirk, and frae all dueties to your Majestie in this commonweal ; and that nawayes for any wUfuU standing to the defence of our doings, but only for that being cited and compeirand before the Lords of the Secreit CounsaU we wald not condemne' ourselves before tryall, being urged be them, upon our oath, and under the paine of contumacie, to give our opinion concerning that meeting ; anent the whUk, as ever, so yet, we submit ourselves, our proceedings, and judgment therof, as said is, being maist will ing, in all humUity, to amend whatsover we shaU be found to have "Gibson's MS. has " member." t Commanded. X Gibson's MS. has " vindex." § Gibson's MS. has " since the." || From this place to the last sentence in the letter, next page, beginning with " Sa humbly remitting, " &c. is not in Gibson's MS, / ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 511 done amisse, contrairy to the Word of God, constitutions or cus toms of the Kirk, or lawes of this your Majestie's kingdome, according to the censures of the judges competent ; and now, being in your Majestie's hands, to doe with us as seemes good to your Majestie ; having in every thing whilk we have done in thir our proceedings continuaUy giving evidence [given evident] proofe of humility, reverence of our hearts towards your Majestie, and in every thing having followed that which is agreable to the will of our God, according to our knowledge ; we yet protest, before God, that yet, frae the bottom of our hearts, we are sorry that your Majestie, should be grieved with us our proceedings, and do most humbly beseech your Majestie to relent your Highnesse's wrath, and to be appeased towards us, the servants [of] your Majestie's God, and of your Majestie in God, in aU things ; who never wer nor (God willing) shaU be unfaithfull or disobedient, let be trai- tours, to your Highnesse's authoritie. So humbly remitting the consideration of our weakened persons, so many moneths impri soned, our famUyes outerly impoverished through our extraordinary charges, and our desolate flocks wherin so many soules have bein so long deprived of the comfort of the Gospel ; and prostrating ourselves before your Majestie, we wish frae God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, encrease of honour, prosperity and peace to your Majestie and your Highnesse's throne, with eternaU life hereafter to your Majestie and your Majestie's posterity. " Frae the places of our imprisonment the 24th, 25th and 26th dayes of Februar 1606. " Your Majestie's most humble Supplicants, loving and obedient Subjects, and daylie Orators." This * letter being prepaired in aU their names, Mr John Forbes, fearing that advantage should be taken of his writing to his Majes tie against himself, rather then against any of the CounseU, whom he suspected his Majestie not so much to mislike for any wrong done against him and his bretheren, as for their slownesse in pro- * From this to the paragraph at p. 514, ending with these words, " as oft as he should think good," is not in Gibson's MS, 512 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE moveing, and secreit policy in hindering, the Bishops erection: therefore, at the first, resolved to write nothing in particular ; yet efterward, be advice, finding the matter betwix the Chanceler and him first divulged be the Chanceler his conference with Mr John Welsh, Mr James Balfour and Mr Walter BalcanquellJ and by his own speaches before the CounseU to Mr John himself, and there after to diverse gentlemen in conference, and now at last brought to his Majestie's eares, as said is, he was perswaded to write, yet so spairing as possibhe he might, fearing be sUence to offend his Majestie, and to put his Highnesse in greater suspicione with him- selffe if he should conceal a known and revealed truth. And, on other parte, desirous to avoide aU occasion of danger to himself or others, be pubhshing more than was already manifested ; as also, considering how far the concealing of that matter so long, had brought both him and his brethern in such danger of his Majes tie's wrath, and that the manifesting thereof would, at least, if not prevent the danger, yet make the iniquity of rigorous proceeding against them the more evident to all men ; he concluded to write as after followes : — Please your Sacred Majestie, &c. * WhUl these letters were prepairing, the CounseU was informed that Mr William Irwing had bein in Blacknesse conferring with the ministers ; whereat the Chanceler and President, albeit they knew nothing of his errand, yet fearing that be him some report and inteUigence, according to the truth of their proceedings, might be conveyed to his Majestie be him, they sent direction to the Earle of LinUthgow, that in naewayes Mr WUliam sould be suf fered to have entresse within the Castle of Blacknesse again, who, according to their direction, commanded his servant the Constable * This letter, and some other letters of Forbes, referred to afterwards, are neither in Swinton's nor in Gibson's MS., and we have not succeeded in finding copies of them elsewhere. In the former MS. a blank is left for these letters, as if it had been the intention of the author to insert them at some subsequent period. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 513 to see it were obeyed. Hereupon, Mr WUliam comeing back again to Blacknesse to receive his answere, he was holden at the gates, and accesse to the Ministers refused him, yet [in sUence of the night, secreetly the Ministers *] convoyed out the letters to him at [ane smaU open in the *] gate, who, receiving them, took post back to his Majestie the 27th of Februar ; the Earle of Dumbar being yet in his journey towards Court, so that Mr WUUam did preveen him, and did come to his Majestie before him. The let ters considered, his Majestie began throughly to be resolved, that whatsoever the Bishope of Glasgow had spoken to him concerning the Chanceler and President was trew ; and so his mynd began to be estranged from them, as men both ungrait and deceitfull, who, being advanced highly be his Majestie, and put in the trust of his Majestie's most weighty affairs, and having promised to effectuat his desire, did not the less secreitly practise the contrair ; whilk speciaUy he gathered of that confession contained in the letter sent be Mr John Forbes, that he went not to Aberdein without the free knowledge and advice of some of them, and their appro bation to that whilk was done, providing no more should be done : whilk words, lest they should have bein wrong apphed, Mr John had wiUed Mr William Erring to shew his Majestie that they were meant of the Chanceler, whUk his Majestie of himself conceived} because of the Bishop of GEsgow his speach. This did give a fit occasion to the Lord Fleeming and Earl of Dumbar coming to Court to prosecute their intentione ; for finding alreddyhis Majes tie's mynd brought in jealousie with these men, they did what they could to augment it for the causes before specifyed, and did so far prevaU, that they brought his Majestie to yeald to the removing of both ChanceUer and President from their offices, yet so as it should proceed upon ane lawfuU conviction of undutifulnesse. The ground they thought fitest for that purpose was, their inteUi- gence, foreknowledge, and approbation of the Assemblie at Aber dein ; wherein they presumed verily that Mr John Forbes would be their accusers, in respect of the severity, unjust, bitter proceed- * The words within brackets are deleted in MS. 2k 514 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE ing used be them against himself and his remanent bretheren. Thus, they concluded to use him as the instrument to procure the accomplishment of their designe. His Majestie for prosecuting the matter, did give commission to the Earl of Dumbar and my Lord Fleeming, with so many others, to take tryaU of that matter; and for the greater security, be their advice, his Majestie did again direct Mr WiUiam Ewing vrith commission to Mr John Forbes, desireing him to inform his Majestie how he was able to verify the Chanceler's foreknowledge and approbation of their proceedings at Aberdein, wiUing him to clear it either be writ, witnesses or cir cumstance, and it should suffice. This commission was Ukewayes covered with a pretence of ane generaU creddeit to the had wairded ministers in his Majestie's name, desiring them to passe from their Declinatour ; and, for surety of accesse, whilk Mr WU liam declaired to his Majestie would be denyed to him, his High nesse did give him ane warrand from himself to the Constable of Blacknesse, with ane strait direction to suffer him to conferr with the Ministers at his pleasure, privatly or pubhckly, as oft as he should think good. Upon the 13th of this Februar, according to the King's direc tion, the CounceU made a decree for publishing of a proclamation, to hinder all pubhck speeches in pulpits against their proceedings with the Ministers in Blaknes, &c. ; which afterwards they caused print, which is as foUowes : — " James, be the grace of God, King of Great Brittane, France and Ireland, Defendar of the Faith, to our lovitts f messingers, our sheriffs in that pairt, conjuncthe and severaUie, speciaUie constitute, greiting : Foralsemeikle as We and our thrie Estaites of Parliament, quhilk conveined at Edinbroughe in the month of Maij 1584 yeires, considdering the great harme and in convenience quhilk feU out within our kingdome through the wicked and licentious pubUct and privat speaches, and untrew calumnies, uttered be diverse undewtifuU subjects, to the disdaine, reproach, and contempt of us, our Counsell, and proceidings, stir- ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 515 ring up our subjects to mislykeing and unquyetness, and to cast ing off their dew obedience to us : Therefore We, and our said Estaites of Parhament, statute and ordaine, That none of our sub jects, of quhatsoever function, degrie, or quaUitie, sould presume, or tak upon hand, in tyme coming, privatlie or publictlie, in ser mons, declamations, or particuUar conferences, to utter any fals, sclanderous speaches, to the disdaine, reproach, or contempt of us, our CounseU, or proceidings, or meU in the effaires of us and our Estaite, then present and to come, under the paine of death ; cer- . tifieing them that sould be tryed * to be contraveiners therof, or who sould hear sic sclanderous speaches and not reveaU the same, that the said paine sould be execute upon them without favour, as in the said Act of Parliament at length is contained. In the quhUk Parhament, also, be ane uther act, our royaU power above aU Estaites of our kingdome, both spirituaU and temporaU, was estabUshed; and, therfor, it was ordained, That no person, of quhat soever function or degrie, spirituaU or temporaU, sould declyne our judgment in any matters of sedition or treasson, or uther civUl or criminaU, or in any contumelious, seditious, treassonable speaches, thus uttered be them in pulpits, schooUs, or uther rowmes, under the paine of treasson, as in our said act, at mair length, is contained. And, farder, in our Parliament haulden at LinUthgow, in the moneth of December 1595 yeires, it was statute and ordained be us and our thrie Estaits, That aU our subjects sould conteine themselffes in quyetnes and dewtifuU obedience to us and our authoritie, and in na wayes to presume or tak upon hand, in time coming, publictlie to declair, or privatlie wryte, any purpose or sclander of our person, estaite or government, or to reproach our lawes or Acts of Parliament, or to misconstruct our proceidings, quhairby any mislykeing may be moved betwixt us and our NobilUtie and good subjects, under the paine of death, as in our said Acts of Parliaments, at mair length, is contained. Lyk- as also, in the Generall Assemblie of the Kirk, haulden at Perth in the moneth of March 1596 yeires, (quhair also, and at that same * That is, found. 2 K 2 516 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE instant tyme, there was ane very solemne and frequent Assembhe of the NobiUitie, and CounseU, and Estaites of our kingdome,) it was ordained and agried, with full consent of the said Assembhe, That no ministers sould reprove our acts, lawes, statutes, ordi nances, whUl [untU] he beis advysed of his Presbitrie, Synod, or Generall Assemblie, sould complaine, or seik remeid of the same from us, and report our answer, befor any farther proceiding, as it is contained in an act of the said AssembUe, quhilk was ratified and approven be us and our Estaites conveined at the tyme forsaid. Notwithstanding quhairof, it is of trueth, that [there are] sum rest les and unquyet spirits als weiU of the ministers as uthers, — abuseing our lenitie and favour, and presuming of impunitie, be the bygane prooffes and examples of our proceidings and deaUing with them, quhairin we have very tenderUe and cairfuUie sought the peace of the Kirk, and retaining the preachers therof in that modestie quhUk appertaines to their professione and calling, — who cease not, in their publict sermons and privat conferences, to impugne and misconstruct the proceidings of our CounseU in that lait proces that was used against that Uttle handfull of the Ministrie, who con- temptuouslie maid the fashione of ane GeneraU Assembhe, and keiped ane pretendit Conventicle at Aberdein, in the moneth of Juhj last, and wUfuUie and maUtiousUe not only maintained the samen sensyne as ane lawfull Assemblie, bot, lykwayes, most treas- sonablie and seditiousUe declyned the Counsell in that matter, and, therby, denyed our EoyaU power and prerogative, quhairby they are convict and found guiUtie be ane verry famous inquest of ane number of Honorable Barrones and Gentellmen, of good rank and- credit ; quhairby thir restles and unquyet ministers, prophaneing the chyre of veritie with seditious, sclanderous, and uncomhe speaches, and raUling against the proceidings of our CounseU, as said is, in contempt and break of the lawes, and actes, and ordi nance of the Kirk, do what in them lyes to corrupt the hearts and opinions of our good subjects, and to aUienat and withdraw them from their dew obedience to us and our Counsell, — a matter unseimlie in persons of their professions and calling, and carrye- ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 517 mg with it ane very unfamous sclander to the Kirk. Bot seeing -mercie and clemencie, quhilk ever has accompanied our govern ment, being extendit to unthankfuU and bussy bodies, produces nothing bot contempt upon contempt, and the more that We and our CounseU deaU in peace with sic sort of people they are the more arrogant and loftie, neglecting their studies and contempla tions, and spending the tyme appointed for preaching and in structing of their flockes, with idle talk and impertinent dis courses, and melhng with matters of Estaite, quhairof there is no toUeration within no uther Kirk of Europe : We and our CounseU have resolved no longer to spaire this proud contempt of us and our lawes, bot to put our saids lawes in execution with aU rigour. Our wiU is heirfor, and We chairge yow straitlie, and command, that incontinent thir our letters seine, ye pas, and in our name and authoritie, command, chairge, and inhibite aU and sundrie, our subjects of quhatsoever degrie, quaUitie or condition soever they be, that nane of them presume, nor tak upon hand, privatlie or publicthe, in their sermones, declamations, or privat conferences, to utter any sclanderous speaches against the proceiding of our CounseU and Justice in tryeing and punishing of the saids Minis ters ; and on na wayes to mell in that matter, nor uther the effaires and proceidings of our CounseU and Estait, bygane, present and to come, under the paine of death ; certifieing them that faillyies, and does in the contrair therof, that the said paine of death saU be execute upon them without favour ; certifieing, also, aU and quhatsoever persons that saU happen to be present, and hear the said sclanderous, seditious, and uncomlie speaches, and sail not reveall the samen, that the said paine sail be lykwayes execute upon them ; and sicklyk, that, in our name and authoritie, ye com mand and chairge all and sundrie Shereffes, Stewarts, BaiUyies of our EegaUiteis, Proveist, BaiUyies, and CounseU within Borrowes, Noblemen, Barrones, and Gentellmen of power to landwart, and ilk ane of them, conjunctlie and severaUie, who .sail be present auditors of sic sclanderous, seditious and treasonable speaches, uttered in pulpits, pubUct sermones, or otherwayes, in contempt, 518 CERTAIN RECORDS TOUCHING THE reproach, or disdaine of us, our parents or progenitours, of our Counsell, our proceidings, or meUing vrith the effaires ef our Estaite, present, bygane and to come, to stope and interupt the speakers and utterers therof, tak, apprehend them, and put them in sure firmance, whill [untU] We and our Counsell be adver- teissed, that order may be taken with them as accordes : Concern ing all and sundrie persons forsaids who shaU hear the said sclan derous, treasonable, seditious speaches, and saU not apprehend the authors and utterers therof, if it be in their power, and, faUl- yieing therof, reveall the samen to our CounseU, That the hearer and not apprehender, if it ly in their power, — conceaUer, and not reveaUer, of the said leassing makers and authors of the said sclanderous and seditious speaches, — saU be punished in that same measur and degrie as the principaU offenders, conforme to our lawes and Acts of Parliament maid heiranent ; and, farther, that ye, in our name and authoritie, command and chairge our said Shereffs and Stewarts, BaiUyies of our EegaUities, BaiUyies and CounseU within Broughes, Nobelmen, Barrones, and Gentelmen of power to landwart, and ilk ane of them respective, to put our said Acts of Parliament, and this present proclamation anent the present interrupting and stoppeing, takeing and apprehending of the saids false, sclanderous, seditious, and treassonable speakers, to dew execution in all poynts within fourtie-eight houres nixt, efter they be chairged be yow therto, under the paine of rebeUion and putting of them to the home, and escheat, and bring in aU their moveabU goods to our use for their contemption : The quhilk to doe We committ to yow, conjunctlie and severaUie, our full power,* be thir our letters, dewlie execute and indorsate againe to the bearer. " Given under our Signett, at Edinbrough, the threittein of February, and of our reigne of Great Britane, France and Ireland, the thrid and threttie-nyne yeires. " Per actum Secreti Consilii." ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 519 This proclamation did nothing diminishe, bot raither augment, the open outcry of aU, bot speciaUie of the ministrie ; who, being greathe offendit at so godles and prophane ane edict in a Christian kingdome, under a Christian King, pubhshed by a CounseU profess ing Christianitie, Commissioners were direct from the Synods of Lothiane and TividaiU, to complaine thereof to the Counsell, and wiU them, in the name of Jesus, to redresse it ; who did present in wryt the Greiffes foUowing, to the Counsell : — " Certain Greiffes of the Ministers of Lauthian and Tevidale, being assembled at Edinburgh the 25th of February, anno 1606, conceived upon the Proclama tion, to be given in to the Most Honorable Privie Coun sell, and some redresse to be sought for them. * " First, In aU reverence and humilitie we lament and regrate, That quhairas the messingers and servands of Christ, preachers of God's Word, are authorised be the Holy Scriptures, with full and frie power and commission, to preach the Word, impugne, rebuik, admonishe, exhort, and correct, and that under no less paine then casting both bodie and souU into eternaU hell's fyre ; yet not the less be that Proclamation restraint is maid of their Ubertie, and they discharged, in a pairt, to use their chairge and commission, quhUk to them is given of God towards ane everie persone that is of his famiUie, — quhairas we are oppenhe inhibite, on na wayes, to meU with any affaires of his Majestie's Counsell, and that under the paine of death, to be execut without all favours : Quhilk in aU humilitie, we craive it would pleas your Honors to redresse, becaus it is expresse against the Word of God, and practeiss of his holy servands in all ages. " Secondlie, We most heaviUy lament, That in that proclamation the holy ministrie ar insimulat, t yea, oppenlie notted indicta causa, as restles and unquyet spirits, seditious, sclanderous, and unseemlie speakers, declaimers, raiUers, disdainers, reproachers, contempners of his Majestie's lawes, withdrawers and corrupters of his Majestie's * This title is from Gibson's MS. t Charged. 520 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE subjects hearts from his obedience, unthankfuU, bussie bodies, proud, arrogant, loftie, prophaners of the chair of veritie, spending the tyme appoynted for preaching upon idle talk and unpertinent discoursses, breakers of his Majestie's lawes, and ordinances of the Kirk : QuhUk, seeing it tends to the disgrace and contempt of the holy message quhairin we serve, to the manifest hinderance of the course of the GospeU, unto the heigh dishonour of the great God, in all humUitie and earnest maner, we craive the same to be re dressed. " Thirdlie, Be that Proclamation, strait command and power is given, not only to magistrats and persons clad with pubUck autho ritie, bot also to every man that pleasses oppenhe to resist the course of doctrine, to close the mouth and interrupt the preacher in his sermone, — a matter very strange and of great noveltie, quhilk human civUhtie forbids to be used against any pubhck speaker, in any (although prophane and common) matter or sub ject ; — quhUk if in this it saUbe permitted, it wUl breid great con- fussion, and it saU come to pass that the paroche kirks and pulpits, quhilk are of God ordained for doctrine of peace, and reformation, saU become publict places of contention, stryffe and tumults, and entertaine the corrupt humours of persons eviU disposed, to the heigh dishonour of God's Majestie, the breaking of his Majestie's lawes, (James VI, Par. ii. Act. 27,) unto the great hurt and dis pleasure of aU that being present are touched with any sense or fear of God. " Lasthe, The interruption, taking, and apprehending of the Ministrie in the course of their doctrine is commanded to aU men, as weUl magistrats as uthers, quhilk is unlawfuU to any ; quhairby not only the common people are maid judges of our doctrine, bot also even the reinzies loussed to all prophane persons and Papists, speciaUie under pretence of the said Proclamation, to abuse the ministrie and to be revenged of their own particular quarreUs ; and so sail steir up in every flock, some for invasion, some for defence, quhairupon may follow shedding of blood, and many uther great inconveniences ; quhairas his Majestie's acts have prescryved a ESTATE OF THE KIRK^ 521 more peaceable and orderlie form of apprehending very excom- municats, efter sermons, sacraments, and prayers." Thir Greiffes being presented and read, the ChaunceUour answer ed them, be word, as foUows : — First, In general that these Greiffes wer no greiffes indeed, be caus conceaved upon the Proclamation misconstructed ; as also becaus there was nothing contained in the Proclamation bot that quhilk is expresshe aither in the Acts of Parhament, or Act of CounseU, namehe, anent interrupting, maid anno 1596. In particu lar, to the First greiff he answered, FEst, Enquyring if they might not reprove some except they meddled with the King and his CounseU? SecondUe, Desyring them tauntinglie to come and teU themselves first before they tauld sutters and taUzeours. To the Second greiff he answered, First, Eiquyring if they would not say that Earles, Lords, Barrons, if they wer adulterers, &c, sould goe to heU and name no man in particular, except they wer sic men as wer controUable [incontroUable ?] . 2 . Whereas they aUedged they wer notted indicia causa ; he answered it was not so, becaus sex were convict ; at quhilk word one Mr Adam Colt replyed, Non relevatur, because proclamation was not against them, neither wer they convict of these things. To the Third he answered, There was ane Act of CounseU for the same, [which, if they pleased, (said the Lord Advocate,) they would insert in the proclamation, or otherwise they would shew it to them. *] To the last he answered, Desyring them, if they got any wrong, to complaine, and they sould gett ane sufficient answer. Thus pairtlie with prophane mocks and scoofes, and pairtUe defending their late iniquitie with their former, — this godless act and edict of CounseU by uthers alyke maid be themselffes befor, — they answered the Greiffes and dis missed the Ministers ; who persaiving their mahtious prophanness, thoght it meit to insist no more with them, bot to indevour in their caUing to be faithfuU, committing the event to God. The Counsell perceaving their proclamation to have nothing * From Gibson's MS. 522 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE terrified the preachers, nor procuired any obedience in the people, bot as the one spake frielie against their impietie, so the uther heard it patenthe, and dayhe more and more did abhor it : Therfor, knowing, and as they confes themselffes, finding the simple sort to be too credulous of every fals report, they did sett foorth the book so oft mentioned be us heirtofore, intituled, " A Declaration of the Just Causses of his Majestie's Proceedings against these Ministers who are now lying in Prisson attainted of Heigh Treas son, sett foorth by his Majestie's CounseU of his kingdome of Scotland;" a birth, indeid, fithe and lyveUe representing the father, and a fruit carryeing the kyndlie savour of the trie, if by the Coun sell ye understand these who wer the cheiff and almost only actours in this tragedie, to wit, the Lords ChaunceUour, President, and Advocat, * of whom I would have aU men to esteeime us to speak in this whoU discourse, quhen we name the CounseU. In this booke, they pretend their purpose to be, to remove aU scruple of justice and necessitie of their proceidings against the ministers out of the people's hearts, by setting doun the trew staite of the question, with aU that hath foUowed and ryssen therupon. But so far have they erred from trueth, that to speak the trueth in the sight of Him, who is only trew, I think there was never so impudent and peart a forgerie against so knowen a trueth, so spytfuh malice against so harmless and innocent persons, oppenhe professed be sic whose profession outward does obleidge them to the maintenance of the trueth, whose caUings requyre justice and equitie in their proceidings, and whose advancement from almost nothing, to be the ruUers of a kingdome, sould have procuired^ greatter thankfullness to God, from whom alone aU advancement cometh. To whose bitter reproaches against the faithfuU servands of Jesus, and manifold calumnies against the trueth and veritie of their actions, aUbeit I be not purposlie sett to mak answer in this - discourse, yet would I have all men, by consideration of this faith full and upright Narration of that matter from the beginning, to * That is, the Karl of Dunfermline, Lord Chancellor ; Lord Balmcrinoch, Lord President ; and Sir Thomas Hamilton, Lord Advocate. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 523 learne quhat wrong and injurie is done by the penners to these guUtless ministers and messengers of God in that scandalous pamphlet, pairtlie by conceaUing the trueth both of theirs and the CounseU's proceidings, pairtlie by oppen caUumnies against the trueth of both, pairtlie by wreisting aU things to a wrong sense, against their own knowledge, and pairtUe by laying doun the bitter and malicious thoghts, inventions and conceptions of their own hatefull and eviU dispossed mynds for the causses and grounds of the ministers actions ; in aU quhilk it may be weiU seeine how 8kUlfuUie they have learned to practeiss, among the rest, that pro phane precept of their master Machievell, Calumniare audacter, adhcerebit aliquid. The former discours oppens up the most pairt of these callum- nies quhairwith this action hes bein traduced wrongfullie. There rests yet one to be considered. It is said in that foresaid book of " Declaration," that the only thing the Ministers could aUedge for themselffes why they sould not go to the tryeU of ane assyse was, that the said statute of Maij 1584, was therefter interpretted and hmited by a particular clause of a statute maid in 1592, quhairin it is declaired that the said act maid in 1584, against the declyning of the CounseU's judgment, saU no wayes be pre judicial!, nor derogat any thing to the priviUedges which God hes given to the spirituaU office-bearers in the Church, concern ing heads of religion, &c. Heirin I remitt the Eeader to the reas- soning of this matter befor the Lord Justice, and the speaches uttered be the PanneU, to try in this poynt quhat credit the authors of that reproachfuU lybeU merit ; and, by their frawdulent dealhng in this one thing, to learn quhat trueth is in the remanent narration of that pamphlet, in the quhUk, from the beginning to the end, it may be justhe said that there is nothing quhilk is not aither forged or falshe reported. We speak not this for informa tion of these who dweU in the land, since it is universallie knowen there quhat difference is betwixt that report and the trueth of that action therin recordit ; bot for resolving the mynds of strangers, in respect there is no Christian Church in Europe quhair these men 524 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE have not caussed their said book to be pubhshed, of set purpose to mak the trueth of God and his holy ministrie odious to aU men, in the mean tym suppressing aU monuments and registers- of their proceidings at home, thinking thereby that the veritie sail never come to light ; and, therfor, have they inhibite the Justice-Clark to impart the process at Linlithgow * to any man, no, not to the pairtie upon any condition ; so that it may seime strange how so much heirof did come into our hands. Bot heuin we are bound to thank God, who wiU not faUl to bring every secreit to light and every work to judgment, whom it hath pleassed to convoy thir things to my knowledge out of the authentick Kegisters. CAP. XH.| LETTERS SENT FROM THE PREACHERS OF THE FRENCH AND FLE MISH CHURCHES AT LONDON, TO THE MINISTERS OF EDENBURGH, WITH AN ANSWER THERETO FROM THE IMPRISONED MINISTERS, AND ANOTHER LETTER SENT FROM THEM BY MR WILLIAM IRR- VING, SERVANT TO THE KING'S MAJESTIE. The CounceU and Commissioners of the Church of Scotland did stiU invent calumnies against the imprisoned Ministers, cheefly the six that were in Blacknes, and by their instruments, whom they had readie for all such imployments, caused them to be spread abroad through the whole Ee, especiaUy at London, all to make those faithfuU ministers odious, cheeflie to their bretheren that were abroad : whereby it came to passe that those false rumours came to the eares of the French and Flemish pastors of the * The process referred to, as contained in the original record, is included in Pit- cairn's Criminal Trials, vol. ii. pp. 494-504. As already stated by Forbes, the trial took place at Linlithgow on the 10th of Januaiy 1606 ; and the warrant and doom of banishment was pronounced, after an interval of upwards of eight months, by Mr Wil liam Hart of Preston, Justice-Depute, on the 23d of October 1606. t From this to the paragraph at page 532, beginning with the words, " It is not to be omitted in this time," &c. is from Gibson's MS. Swinton's gives only the leading facts, and does not contain the letter of the French and Flemish ministers to the ministers of Edinburgh. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 525 Churches at London, through the information of one SE James SempiU * and others, who, having taught their tongues to deceit, . made a trade of traducing the godly, for the pleasure of men, and for their owne gaine. The same pastors, whether moved with displeasure for such reports of their brethren, esteeming them to be true, or, through the persuasion of others who sought by aU meanes to procure some testimonie from strangers against the imprisoned Ministers, it is not certaine ; but, howsoever, they were perswaded to write a letter to the ministers of Edenburgh, wherein they relate the rumors that went abroad, their griefes thereat, and their counseU to their brethren. This letter being communicated by the ministers of Edenburgh to the Presbyterie, it was sent from the ministers thereof, with Mr MicheU Cranstoun, to the ministers in Blacknes, that they themselves might give fuU information for answering the same. The letter here foUoweth : — t " Charissimis et apprime in Christo colendis fratri- bus, Ecclesle Edenburgensis fidis pastoribus. " Ne cuiquam vestrum mirum videatur (fratres in Christo obser- vandi) si homines exteri, vobis fortasse nee de facie nee de nomine noti, de re maxime seria vos ultro compeUare non vereamur : homines sumus Christiani, pastores Ecclesia?, vobis in ampla ilia Christi familia trvvsgyoi ; nihU igitur humanum, Christianum, Eccle siae Dei conducibUe, a nobis alienum esse ducitote. Jam vero agitur apud vos causa maximi momenti, cujus exitum non modo Britannia tota, sed plerseque etiam nationes exterae expectant ; boni anxie, dum Ecclesiae et reipubhea? mala perhorrescunt ; attente maii, si quid inde fuci ad sceleratos suos conatus pingendos confi- cere possint ; utinam tamen nobis adsit &iog uto [Mjxunijs. Quis interim hie sileat aut stertat, quin malo certum remedium quserat, vel optet ? Nobis sane cum dolentibus est dolendum, ex Apostoli * Sir James SempiU of Beltrees : see M'Crie's Life of MelviUe. t The marginal notes which accompany this letter have been added by Forbes, or some other hand, 52(5 certaine records touching the pra?scripto, ac vinctorum meminisse nos decet, acsi vincti essemus. Valide certe nos perculit ad nos delatus rumor, de controversia ilia, qua? tarn eximium regem, et alioquin clementissimum, fratribus aliquot infensum reddidit ; sed multo magis, capitale iUud judicium Majestatis, de quo in eos latam esse sententiam fama percrebuit, quantumvis alioqui bonos, et utUes Ecclesiae Dei servos, kethali prorsus et vobis, et piis pectoribus vulnere. Liceat igitur nobis, fratres, absque "ffokvTrgaypjoavvris, nota et vobiscum ingemiscere, et animi sensa paulo Uberius exprimere ; quis enim ad horrendum tanti fulminis impetum excitatus, de causa, de modo, de remedio non sit solicitus ? Itaque et vestrates Scotos, et ex Anglis ahquot, quibus noveramus, et Ecclesia? Dei, et fratrum vmctorum curam incumbere, interrogavimus, communicatisque consUUs, Parlia- mentorum vestrorum acta, quid fratribus objiceretur, quid contra exciperent ; judicii denique totius fundamenta, quantum assequi Synodi con- potuimus, expendimus. Sic porro nobis animadvertere videmur, cessse Kegia x ' A *¦ ' authoritatxs. jieg}a et publica authoritate rite coactas Synodos vobis esse con- cessas ; nee controvertitur, utrum vobis Ecclesiastica negocia Uceat in hujusmodi coetibus pertrectare. Sed enim Eegii esse muneris asseritur, imperatorum Christianorum more, in omnibus ejusmodi conventibus pra?sidere, locum mutare nonnunquam, tempus pro- rogare, cum penes Eegem sit notitia circumstantiarum multarum, quas et vulgus et pastores etiam ignorare fas est ; qua? tamen ad totius reipublicEe salutem pertineant. insimnian- " ^' Metum quidem in vos omnes cadere potuisse non infician- uian&metus, f ur? ne delationibus variis cuncto praetextu qusesitis, jus tandem nisTEegem Ecclesia? evanesceret vobisque omnino periret, cui malo matura contumeUo- > -n >i i p • tt • p s». cautio adhibenda merit. Verum enimvero, fratres, nee suspicax est ingenium charitatis ; nee de Eegibus nostris imprimis, sinis- tras concipere sententias, honestum est, conceptis certe indulgere, easque fovere periculosum ; neque cum Ulo Petri loco constare po test, ' Eegem honorate.' Ecclesia? GaUica? suas quoque Synodos obeunt, regni edictis stabUitas : si Eex tamen ejusmodi proroga- tionem, locive mutationcm indiceret, quod aUquando contigit, du- bium non est quin Eegi suo paritura? essent, quamvis Eomana? ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 527 superstitionis professori : Quid enim si Eex, vel a pestis contagio suis cavendum, vel hostis impetum metuendum esse, aut aliquid simUe, quaha multa humanitus contingunt, imminere deprehenderit, hiccine Eegia authoritas in sublimi specula, clavum tenens reipub- lica?, pro nihUo ducenda erit ? " 2. Demus tamen justum extitisse noxa? metum, ne ex mora 2. Etiam coi- tandem res tota periret. Attendant tamen, fratres, annon supplici- ti0™s t?me- bus et iteratis votis a Kege petenda fuerit aha certi temporis in- SHJ1 dictio ; neque enim verisimUe est, Eegem, et doctrina et pietate toti hSicerT orbi conspicuum, addimus et prudentia non vulgari ornatum, volu- isse tarn necessariam Ecclesia? fulturam conveUere. Videant (in- quam) fratres, annon hie prius et potius multa tentanda fuerint, quam pra?sumptis suspicionibus indulgeretur. " 3. Adde quod cum, et per Presbyteria, ante conventum, et 3. in ipso conventus loco, solenni more fratribus innotuisse, asseratur t8™!*". Eegium interdictum, eos non modo non paruisse, regu ministri ^ntaSln- conqueruntur, sed et in ipso conventu apparitorem seu clericum, seSn e altero summoto, creasse, et proxime Conventum habendum indixe, non sine authoritatis Eegiae contemptu, quod quatenus cum actis Parliamenti, et usitato more conveniat, anxie ha?remus. " 4. Sed et acrius multo nos pungit, quod fratres in jus vocati, 4. clrilem et Eegiam Jurisdictionem excutere visi sunt, et conscripto Ju^S™ exhibito cujus exemplar legimus, et cui mordicus inha?rere malue- Su?*0113 rint, quam Ulud interpretatione moUire, qua? Eegis animum pla- care, et ipsos periculo eripere posset candide et moderate, de fratrum pietate et prudentia sentire par est. Absit ergo a nobis ut in quenquam jus calculi damnatorii assumamus. " 5. Verum quid regerant multi, et quidem boni viri, qui sertam *-homa tectam Ecclesia? Scotica? concordiam, et a famoso talis inobedientia? ^t^St scandalo liberam esse, vehementer cuperent, vicissim audire cogi- nitate™d mur ; atqui prasterquam, quod legibus capitale subterfugium hujus- p™«p«? cemodi esse animadvertunt, non vident quomodo Ecclesiastica de "J™^ immunitate a civihbus subseUiis privilegia ejusmodi constare pos- ^"^ sunt, cum pra?ceptis Apostolicis, qua? regibus, gubematoribus, potestatibus omnibus, omnem animam subjiciant, — omnem, inquam, 528 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE ne Apostolis quidem et Prophetis exceptis, interprete Chrysos- tomo ; et obvia sunt Christi, Pauli, Ignatii, Polycarpi, myriadum prisco seculo exempla, qui nullo se privilegio existimarunt munitos, quo minus vocati se sisterent, et judicia Ucet profana subirent ; et evocatus a Saule summus Sacerdos Abiathar, at capitale judicium, causam dixit simpliciter, nuUa exceptione aut cfrcuitione usus. At enim jam liberior est Ecclesia? conditio. .6- " 6. Audivimus, et magna cum Principis laude, et beneficio, Diluitor ' O r J ' condSone quod fraudi sibi esse vix quisquam patiatur. OcuEti certe et litaiora™1 cordati Principes, dum cogitant quibus gradibus ad tyrannicum potestatis fastigium sese extulerit Pontifex Eomanus, nuUo corn- pen dio maj ore totam Ecclesiam vident, et Barbaro fastu oppressam lugent, quam excusso civihs potestatis jugo. Ecquid mirum, igitur, si Principes, quo potentiores, et robustiores erunt, eo futuri sunt in singulos ordines oculatiores, quandoquidem si servandum est jus, accuratissima dihgentia est imperii causa servandum ? 7. " 7. Neque vero nescimus, bonos et eruditos patres, Ambrosium EtPatrum x ' ..... muitalE"'^- dicimus, Augustinum, Gregorium Primum, et sinules juris Ecclesi- en«uin?ba" astici modeste severos vindices, in causis fidei, multum Episcopis tribuisse : et fratres, quoque, de inito conventu, controversiam mere Ecclesiasticam et Spiritualem, esse nusquam aUbi, quam in Eccle siastico generaU ccetu dijudicandam ; profiteri audimus ; sed enim ex eventu, id est ex jam judicato, constat, eos, id quod controversum est, pro confesso sumere. Et sane, vix ac ne vix quidem, tuta stare posset imperii majestas, hac thesi semel constituta, quotiescunque Pastores aliquot conventus agitabunt, quantumvis reluctante Eege, nihU hoc ad Pra?torem, de jure conventus statuat Ecclesiastica. Synodus ; quis admittat, probet, feret. Equidem, fratres tarn a sceleratis conspirationibus abesse, quam nos ipsos, statuimus, verunT qui hytrrgtxug Synodos Episcoporum, Arrianorumque et circumceU- ionum furores meminerit, vel tum cum Alcyonia vixdum Ecclesia gustasset jus quidem Christianorum Principum, in Episcoporum conventus, ad vetus institutum informandum, et nunquam abro- gandum curabit. " Quorsum vero tam multa, num ut censoria virgula, Christiano- ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 529 rum fratmm affiictionem aha cumulemus afflictione ? Facessat a nobis usque adeo ridicula temeritas, sa?vaque fratemitas. Vemm per vos nobis Uceat, fratres fratmm et Ecclesia? Scotica?, damnis vobis eviiTtttrfcUV. Segnius irritant animos demissa per aures, quam qua? sunt ocuUs commissa fidelibus. Sed quod a vobis presentibus tristissima rerum facies tristisskna impetrat, ut metu, precibus, consiUo, re ipsa fratribus, et laboranti Ecclesiae manus auxUiatrices pra?beatis ; date et nobis absentibus, de multorum virorum bonorum cum sententia, tum hortatu, ad imminentem Ecclesia? plagam con- tremiscere. Eegum et judiciorum authoritate, reipublica? salutem constare certum est, quam quidem, quotquot regnare volent, nun- quam Ebefactari patientur ; itaque judicia in reos lata, vel exequu- tione, vel gratiosa Principis condonatione finire est necesse. Prius iUud in fratres vel metuere, vel gravissimum infligit vulnus. Ecquid enim Scotiam jamdudum Christo sacram, sacri verbi Dei mhustrorum sanguine madere, honestas famUias, atque adeo Eccle sias, Pastorum pra?sidio, sanctisque laboribus orbari sancti minis- terii dignitatem fieda perdueUionum labe commaculari, praedatoriam Papistarum et Jesuitarum factionem, veros Ecclesia? Pastores, sibi rebeUionis socios, aUquo saltern pra?textu, affingere posse, Eomana? synagogse triumphos et plausus eo nomine parare ? Quis bonus ad tantorum malorum vel suspicionem summo cum horrore non inge- miscat. Nam ex tota Ula Papistarum colluvie, si qui fortasse causa? fratrumpatrocinium ostentant, Joabi osculo nobis omnibus imponunt, quos cruento gladio confossos cuperent, imo et pra?starent, siquidem us quicquid hbet Uceret. Martyrium fatemur splendidissimam esse coronam, sed puram castam, et ab omni maU suspicione vacuam. Enimvero fratres quotocunque in mentem venire poterit, pientis- simum Eegem, sacri ministerii assertorem, Antichristiana? tyranni- dis infestissimum hostem, e totius Acherontis faucibus nuperrime ereptum, ipsius et suorum saluti, summo Ulo custode IsraeUs in- vigUante, suique Eegis mentem cor, oculos, aures, manus, mirum prorsus in modum dirigente ? Quis, inquam, credat clementissimum et prudentissimum Regem, innoxio sanguine Pastorum Ecclesia?, cujus se protectorem esse gloriatur, sua subsellia polluere voluisse ? 2 L 530 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE Quem animadvertant, in nonnullis patria? et pietatis hostes plus justo indulgentiorem videri ? Nunquam certe tanto Principi defu- turi sunt, qui nomen ejus ab injustitia? labe vindicent. Ergo quod unicum superest, utinam ad ejusdem dementia? asUum confugere fra- conciiium tres in animum inducant. Sic enim non vanis rumoribus accipimus, dunt veniam . ........ -r. culpa; depie- et vmctis, et mmisteru dignitati Regem consultum veUe, quatenus caildam. 7 ° ° '. * per eos, inviolatam stare Regiam authoritatem Ucebit. Quod si no- biscum vobis eadem stat sententia, detur obecramus, in absentia? sub- sidium, vestro ore aut opera periclitantes fratres, ad quos nobis alio- qui non patet aditus compeUare. Hie vero quid vos restitare audi- mus fratres, ecquid oramus a ministerii vestri dignitate alienum vide- tur, si mala? mentis, maii animi crimen deprecantes, qua decet animi submissione veniam a Rege vestro postuletis, si qua in re se a vobis offensum esse existimabit ? Neque vero urgemus, ut contra mentem, Ratio a quod bonum est malum esse dicatis ; ex multis certe totius Regni dMoTaSS- Scotici presbyteriis ad hunc de quo agitur conventum evocatis, bus et pres- 1 • • t > -r» • • •• • byteriis facto, cum tam multi mterdicto potius Kegis paruermt, et ex us qui adierunt, aliquot veniam a Rege petitam impetrarint, totidem suis quasi calculis, causa? vestra? praejudicarunt. " ' In multis labimur omnes,' ait Apostolus, * et qui verbo non of fendit, hunc perfectum esse opportet.' ' NihU,' inquit ille, ' mihi sum conscius, sed in hoc justificatus non sum.' Et si justitias nostras Propheta menstruata? muheris panno similes esse agnoscit ; annon e turbulentis et incompositis animi affectibus, sordes multa? erum- punt, qua? nos in singula momenta, et in actionibus pra?stantioribus, ad culpas heu nimias ingemiscere cogunt ? Itaque fratres in Christo charissimi, per vitam, et sacra capita vinctorum, imo vero per Christum totius Ecclesia? caput, oramus, ut quatenus per serenis- simi aeque ac potentissimi Eegis dementia Ucebit, ora malignan-, tium obturetis, Symmystasquevestros meliora consiUaedoctos abim- minente periculo eripiatis, quod penes eos esse, venia petita et impe- trata, plerique vera? cultores pietatis non dubitant. Nos certe charis simi et observandissimi fratres, sincerum et candidum animum, his nostris Uteris exsculptum voluimus, ab eo scopo et norma, nuUius nos unquam, aut usquam gratia abducere possit, quahscunque autem fuerit et scopus et tota scribendi ratio, si quid tamen vel mentis ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 531 errore, vel incompositis verbis irrepserit, quod veniam mereatur, hanc concedite quotquot estis, utrobique fratres. Reliqua Christi ana? charitati, justa?que de fratribus, et sancta? Ecclesia? soUcitudini ascribitote. Dominus lesus suo vos omnes Spiritu gubemet et ducat, ad suam et Patris gloriam, Ecclesiasque totius salutem ! "Datum Londini 26 Feb. 1605, Veteri calculo. " Vestri in Christo fratres et Symmysta? de fratrum multorum Sententia Gallica? et Belgica? Ecclesiarum Pastores, " Robertus Masso Fontanus, Aaron Cappel, Nathanael Marius, Ecclesice Gallicce Pastores. Leonhardus Moiartus, Johannes Regius, Simeon Ruitingius, * Ecclesiae Belgicce Pastores." After the reading and consideration of this Letter, the Ministers in Blacknes, finding thereby their doings to be wonderfully tra duced, and many calumnies spred abroad against them, to make them and their cause odious to all Forreign Churches, thought it necessarie to answer the same letter. But knowing that such as were Bishopes and Commissioners in the Presbyterie of Eden burgh would hinder the answering thereof, by the said Presbyterie of Edenburgh according to the truth, they themselves being the chiefe sowers and spreaders of such sinistrous rumours against their brethren, they thought it good to write to them generaUy, desir ing them that as they were privie to their whole proceeding, and knew their innocencie in these things wherewith they were calum niated, to satisfie the brethren that had written to them, and to remove the offence which [was produced] by reason of such slan derous reports as were akeady beleeved by many, and were like to spread further, if they were not prevented in time. In the meane tune, knowing not only how carelesse the same Bishopes and Commissioners would be hereof, but also how contrarie thereto, in the persones of the remanent brethren, they resolved to send an answere themselves thereto, directed to the brethren of Eden- * In- the MS. erroneously " Moiachus," and " Kintingius." 2L2 532 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE burgh, to whom that letter from London had been sent, through the help of such among them as were sincere and weU affectioned, to be conveyed to the ministers of the French and Flemish for their better information and full satisfaction in that mater. The Answere written by them is as foUowes : — [See this Answer in Calderwood's History, vol. vi., pp. 402-419. It is dated " At Blackness, April 1, 1606 ;" and " subscribed by the warded Ministers there."] It * is not to be omitted in this tune, what it pleased the Lord to worke in the hearts of these men, who, upon the assyse at LinUth gow, had convicted the ministers in Blacknesse of treasone ; diverse of whom the Lord did smyte with such consciences of their own guUtinesse, that by their trouble and grief it pleased God to make the innocency of his servants more manifest then if they had bein absolved. This was speciaUy seen in Foster of Carden, and [Sir John] Home of North-Berwick; the formest whereof being matched with a most rehgious lady, who did most lamentably complean upon her husband's fault, and deplore the judgment whilk un doubtedly she expected should foUow upon her husband, his pos terity, and house, in the justice of God, — he, I say, was hereby so pricked in his own heart, that if, in the mercifuU providence of God, he had not been keeped back from harming hhnself, he had oft, by his own [hand,] endeavoured to red himself of his unspeak able grief; whilk thereafter being professed be himself, he was, willing to have come before the world and by his pubUck confes sion of his guUtinesse in condemning the innocent to have both " eased his own heart and removed the offence of his deed from others. The other, to wit, Home of North-Berwick, was so hearily . oppressed with his own burden that he was compeUed to take bed fort sicknesse, till by the consolation mkustred to him be his * This paragraph is not in Gibson's MS. f From this to the end of the paragraph is deleted in Swinton's MS. by cross Unes. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 533 pastour he was made by faith to overcome the fear of the Lord's terrour and inward conviction of his own conscience. But to return again to the purpose before specifyed of the con sultation and conclusion at Court, Mr WUUam Evring, according to his direction, coming to Blacknesse the 7th of AprUe, obtained entry and conference vrith the Ministers upon his Majestie's own warrand, and there declared, in generaU, that his Majestie had graciously received their letter, red and considered it, and that thereby his Highnesse's mynd, albeit it was not ftdly satisfied with their proceedings, yet by this better information of their letter it was mitigat towards them ; for whose full contentment he had in commission to desire them to passe from their DecUnatour, and in more humble submission to make suit and supphcation to his Majestie for their delivery. In the meantime he signified his parti cular commission in secreit to Mr John Forbes. It is in substance as it is mentioned before. * To whom they answered, That to go from their Appeale they could not, for the reasons set downe before at length, neither (as they thought) would his Majestie urge them much in that point, since they had so sufficientlie manifested their mind therein, so farre as it concerned his Majestie, both in the de claration of the Appeale before the Lord Justice, and in their letter to his Majestie sent by him before ; and if yet there remained any scruple that required further clearing of their dutie in God accord ing to conscience, they would gladlie satisfie his Majestie there in. And for the last point, they were wiUing, in aU humilitie and reverence, to intreate his Majestie for their peace and libertie. And so after mutuaU inteUigence between them and their bre thren in StirUng and Doune, t they wrote again to the King the uttermost of their mindes, in that mater, and sent it with the said Mr WUUam Irwing, who tooke journey to Court the 22dofAprUl. The copie of the foresaid letter foUowes : — * From this to the end of the paragraph is from Gibson's MS. In Swinton's MS. it is represented by only two or three Unes. f That is, their brethren who were warded in these places. 534 certaine records touching the " Please your Sacred Majestie, " The singular goodnesse and mercy of our God in his provi dence and watchfull cair over your Majestie's persone and government, as in aU things, so speciaUy in this matter of ours, clearly manifested, does cause us continuaUy give thanks to his great and glorious name : First, Considering the great provo cation whilk alwayes we feared, and now not only be naked report, but cheefly be an book of " Declaration," set forth be your Majestie's CounseU here, and be ane Letter sent frae the Ministers of the French and Fleemish Kirks at Londone to the ministers of Edin burgh, we evidenthe perceive hes been made to your Majestie be the sinistrous report of our doings, pairtly in suppressing the truth, and partly in calumnies against the truth, to stir up your Majestie's wrath against us ; — that yet, notwithstanding hereof, the Lord of his infinit goodnesse and speciaU love towards your Majestie, hes stiU keeped back your Highnesse's hand fra being stretched forth to the hurt of the servants of your Majestie's God. Secondlie, For that na show or cuUour of justice whUk hes been put upon the wrang that we have sustained be the doers thereof, aUbeit in cheefest creddeit vrith your Majestie, and your Highnesse oweth speciaU benefeit and favour, hes born sic sway in your Majestie's resolution, that it sould carry your Hignesse's mynd to the approba tion, before your Majestie, according to that princely and fatherly cair of your subjects welfair, should first find your Majestie's con science warranted with greater surety of truth then outward showes can yeald ; hereby manifesting, that as your Majestie ever misliked the outward mask of mercy, when na matter of trew, humility did procuir it, so does not your Majestie acquiesce in the outward mask or show justice, where no substance of equity or ' truth is under it. Thirdlie, With the strength of our heart we magnify the goodnesse of our God, that he lies inchned your Majestie's heart to pity the oppressed, and to open your Majestie's ear to their cry, and lies moved his Majestie to sic clemencie as to vouchsafe a gracious reccit of our letter, and ane indifferent mynd to our report ; praising God for that we find no prejudice be mis- estate of the kirk. 535 report hes taken sic hold on your Highnesse's heart, but that there is alwayes place therein left to the truth, whereof we have clearly informed your Majestie in our last declaration, whilk we have given in the sight of God in aU truth and fidelity, declaring here by how far we have ever bein fra committing that vUe trespasse, wherewith we are traduced in that print " Declaration," and Letter fra Londone, as though we had disclaimed ourself altogether fra any subjection to your Majestie and your Majestie's Counsell, by our Dechnatour given in to them, making aU our actions of whatsumever sort to be mere spirituaU ; we having first to the contrair, in our Supplication, given in to the Counsell before our DecUnatour, whilk also we sent with this bearer last to your Majestie, made open pro fession of our willing submission to them in aU things civiU, and having given so fuU ane testimony of our duty in that poynt towards your Majestie before the Lord Justice, as in our judgment na Christian heart would require more, and that before any inter locutor was pronounced against us ; whUk being dyted be us, was registrat in the Justice Books, howsoever, be appearance of the fore said booke of " Declaration," baith it and aU the rest of our reasons clearing our innocencie, are suppressed fra your Majestie's know ledge. Therefore as then, and in our last letters, so now again, we professe to your Majestie, and testify to aU men, that as we acknowledge your Majestie's soveraign authority, under and in God, over us in aU things belonging to this life, and this hfe itself; so we doe not, neither did we ever, deny your Highnesse's power over us, vindex utriusque tabulae, to command and cause us in our specialest actions * to redresse whatsoever is contrair to the purity of doctrme and sincerity of order and government in the house of God, set down and prescribed be Christ, the only Head and Law giver thereof, in his Word, and practised therein be his Apostles, and to punish aU whosoever shaU be tryed t to doe any thing in the contrair. Neither ever doe we refuise your Majestie's judg ment in our Assembly in this particular, but with aU our hearts would maist earnestly wish that we may have your Majestie's * In Gibson's MS. " spiritual! caUings." t That is> found. 536 certaine records touching the presence therein, (according as it hath heretofore pleased your Ma jestie thereby to honour the AssembUes of the sancts in that judg ment,) to see our proceidings ; albeit it be true that we declyned your Majestie's CounseU in that matter of the lawfulnesse or unlaw- fulnesse of our Assembly, it being spirituaU, and they appointed of your Majestie, onely ane CiviU Judicatorie in matters civiU, and that also with hmitation ; sa that it is lawfuU to other your Majes tie's subjects to dechne their judgment in sic cause (albeit civUl) as belongs to the Lords of Session, and criminaU matters as belong to the Justice. This is the thing whUk we have done, whilk we are assured your Majestie wUl maist willingly aUow as agreable baith to the law of God and your Majestie's own laws ; and if your Highnesse hes sufficienthe espyed the wrong done to us, but more to your Majestie, in drawing in your Highnesse to be pairty to [against] us in this action, thereby the more securely and strongly under that covert, to bear out their mtentions, we doubt not but your Majestie shaU now proceed, as your Majestie hes begun, to the glory of God, your Highnesse's praise, and the joy of your Majestie's people, to let aU your Majestie's subjects un derstand, that as it is said of David the King, in the matter of Abner, * sa that [which] we have suffered in this matter is not your Majestie's deid ; that sa be your Majestie's countenance on the course of your Majestie's princely cair of justice, and righteous government in clemency, for the peace and prosperity of your Majestie's subjects, it may be stiU with your Majestie, as it is said there it was with David, that ' whatsoever the King did it pleased aU the people.' And now for to this effect, as ever before, so now again, we your Majestie's loving, loyaU, and harmlesse sub jects, in aU humility and reverence, prostrat before your Majestie, • beseeks your Highnesse, our maist gracious Soveraign, to bestow upon us your Majestie's favour and clemency, to pity our desolate flocks and families, our persons, our poverty, our long and hard restraint t to the great prejudice of your Majestie's subjects, among whom so many enormities, so great impiety, atheisme and encrease * See 2 Sam. iii. 31-37. f '•«• Imprisonment. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 537 of idolatry have croppen in, becaus the watchmen have bein so long holden fra the walls. Let aU the sancts and our hearts be comfort ed be the gracious benefeit of your dehverance, that aU, in ane voice, may glorify God for his goodnesse, and offer up ' the calves of our Ups' for that in his mercy he hes given, and stUl does pre serve, your Majestie to reigne over us, ane protector of the inno cent, and releef to the oppressed, and defender of the truth, ane shield and joy to the righteous, ane terrour and fear to the wicked ; and that we may have occasion in our lives to expresse the thank- fulnesse of our hearts, towards God and your Majestie, for his cair and singular blessing ; that under your Majestie's wings as the nurishing father of God's Kirk, the sancts, with joy, may serve their God with sincerity, according to his wUl, being thereto not only warranted from danger be the authority of your Majestie's laudable and Christian lawes, but therein also preserved from aU peril, baith of open enemies and crafty hypocrites, either without or within the bounds of your Majestie's dominions, be your Highnesse's gracious protection, whose RoyaU persone, posterity and estate, we humbly beseek the Lord to bless with the encrease of peace and prosperity, and to defend frae aU danger, bodUy and spirituaU, to the coming again of Him who is blessed for ever. " From the pEces of our imprisonment, the 18th and 22d of April 1606. " Your Majestie's most humble distressed Prisoners, &c." In * the particular commissione direct to Mr John Forbes, he, perceiving by conference with Mr WUliam Irwing, and [by] other conjectours fearing that which afterward came to passe, that by pohcie of the Chancelor his enemyes, his letter was to be made the ground of their proceeding against him, as ane abuser of his creddeit at his Majestie's hands ; and that, otherwayes, if Mr John should not clear the verrity of his own write, that it should be used against himself to his farder disgrace and danger ; so [thus] * From this to the end of the chapter is not in Gibson's MS. 538 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE resolving to compeU Mr John, whom they concluded to use as the author of that report, (allbeit purchased from him upon the occa sion ministered be others, in maner as said is,) and so, for fear of his own danger, to inforce him to manifest the truth of that matter touching the Chanceler, that thereby they might attain to their desire against him ; — Mr John Forbes suspecting aU these things, did write, in maner foUowing, ane answere to his Majestie : — * These letters were dehvered to Mr WUliam Evring the 22d of Aprile, the Ministers shewing him, that, in their opinion, they had done as far in the matter of the Declinatour as his Majestie could require, by their interpretation thereof before the Justice, and in their first letter sent by him before ; and, now, lastly, in that their other letter, whilk was outermost of their minde in that eirand ; so that they beleeved his Majestie should urge them no farder, in respect there remained no scruple uncleared of their duety in God, according to conscience, toward his Majestie ; and if there were any yet that remained whilk required furder clearing, they were reddier therein to satisfy his Majestie. As for the last point, they were willing, — and they hoped that the letter should testify the same, — in aU humihty and reverence, to requiest his Majestie for their liberty and peace, so being, that by humihty there were nothing named whUk might be prejudiciaU to their innocency in that for the whilk they had suffered. Thus Mr William returned be post to his Majestie, who, having red the letters, was highly commoved, that Mr John Forbes by his letter did flie all accusing of the Chanceler, and only did endevour to defend himself, and make evident the truth of that whilk he had written. Whereupon his Majestie did send to the Earl of Dum bar, now on his journey with the rest of the Lords towards Scot land, ane letter showing his miscontentment with Mr John. The Earl of Dumbar, being very desirous to have that matter effectuat, after his return, did send ane trusty servant of his own with ane * This letter is not in any of the MSS. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 539 letter, and some credit besyde the letter, to Mr John Forbes, thereby to stirr him up to be more fordward in that action against the Chanceler. The credit we cannot set down, becaus the said Mr John Forbes does keep it secreit to himself. The letter was as followes : — * " Trust Friend, His Majestie," The same, cause hinders us to declair what answere was given to that whilk be creddeitt was committed to the bearer, whilk suf fered us not to expone the creddeit itself. Unto the letter, this answere was returned from Mr John in writ : — f " My very speciall good lord," By this letter, the Earl of Dumbar and the rest conjoyned with him were put again to ane new advisement, finding that Mr John Forbes stiU refuised to accuse the Chanceler of any thing, and so their purpose hke to be impeided. Therefore, the next resolution was to stir up the Chanceler against Mr John, to accuse him as ane who had written ane untruth to his Majestie of [the] Chanceler ; who, not being acquaint with that whilk was written, and so fear ing that more had bein revealed then was, of that whUk had in secreit past betwixt him and Mr John Forbes, was easily moved to insist, that Mr John might be called to ane compt, pairtly upon the outward show of good wiU and favour in the Judges, who stiU seemed to mislike Mr John Forbes's proceeding, and partly upon the confidence he was in, that Mr John should never be able to prove that conference whilk had been betwix them, in respect it was secreit, and no man present thereat, except one hearer of good account, caUed Alexander Burnet, of Leyes ; to whom the Chancder did write in that matter, being his speciaU trusty friend, and the only man who was able to reveal the haill secreits of that conference, shewing him thereof, and yet signifying that he could * This letter is not in any of the MSS. f This letter is not in any of the MSS. 540 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE not expect that Mr John would give himseEout as author sof any sic accusation, in respect he was certain that he was not able to prove it. The reason why he so trusted, was the assurance he had of the Laud of Leyes, that he would affirm nothing to his prejudice, and he knew there was no other privy to the confer ence. On the uther pairt, such as were set to procure the Chan celer' s disgrace, understanding who they were to whom the Chan celer had manifested that there had bein a promise past betwix him and Mr John Forbes, to whom also he had uttered his approba tion of their proceedings at Aberdein, as agreable to that promise, they laboured to know of them what they would depone and witnesse in that matter if their testimony should be required ; and finding sufficient evidence to verify that whilk Mr John had writ ten, given be the Chanceler his own declaration to them, they re solved confidently to prosecut the matter, and to send for Mr John Forbes and bring him before them, to clear himself in that whilk he had written, intending the accomphshment of their pur pose be his defence als weU as if he had bein accuser, in respect his clearing of himself would sufficiently serve to convict the Chanceler in that whilk would undoubtedly procure his disgrace with his Majestie. In this meantime, whUl this is in deviseing, the Chanceler having caUed to minde his speaches to Mr James Balfour and Mr Walter BalcanqueU, fearing greatly that their testimony being craved should convict him in that whilk he had pairtly denyed upon the confidence foresaid, he sent for Mr James Balfour, and finding be him that he would depone the truth of that whilk he had heard, touching his approbatione of Mr John and his rema nent brethren's proceedings at the AssembUe in Aberdein, he ear nestly dealt with him in the contrair ; but prevailing nothing, he tooke purpose to hinder the tryaU, be staying Mr John Forbes from coming before the Judges appointed in that eirand ; [and] if that might not be performed, be taking aU occasion from Mr John of intelhgence with any man. And to this effect, first, he caused the Constable of Blacknesse to keep him and his brethren in such ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 541 strait and closse waird that no creature might have any accesse to them, neither they have Uberty to acquaint others vrith their estate. Therefore, the Judges, having appointed the 24th of Maij to bring Mr John Forbes before them, according to his Majestie's direction, he sent for the Constable, and wUled him to detein Mr John, albeit the CounseU should send for him, and, for doing so, to pretend non-payment of his charges. The Constable willing to obey him, upon urformation of the day the whUk Mr John was to be transported, went to the Earl of Dumbar, and did signify his purpose of deteining Mr John upon the reason foresaid. The Earl of Dumbar, espying the policy, did frustrat that intention, desir ing the Constable not to detem him for that cause, seing he was to be sent back to him again, and, likewayes, he should not fail to procure his payment. Mr John Forbes, aU this time being keeped as said is, was sent for the 24th of Maij 1606, and be some servants of the Earl of Dumbar convoyed to Edinburgh, together with Mr John Welsh, upon occasion of ane letter sent be the appointed Judges to Mr John Forbes, subscribed be seven of them : The tennor fol- lowes : — " Trust friend, — After our heartily commendations, we have given direction anent your transportation here to the brough of Eduiburgh, vrith any one or two of your brethren whom ye think meet to accompany you, for clearing of this matter concerning the Chanceler ; and if ye have any wryte, or any other verification concerning that matter, we requeist and desire you to bring the same with you, to the effect that matter may be put to ane poynt. And so we commit you to God. " From Edinburgh, the 23d day of Maij 1606. (i Your good friend Montrose, Commissioner, Mar, Dumbar, Fleeming, Glamis, Newbattle, Scoon," 542 certaine records touching the Beside this letter, ane direction was sent to the Constable of Blaknesse to deliver the said Mr John Forbes to a servand of the Earl of Dumbar" s, and siklike, any one or two of his bretheren whom he should think meet to accompany him. Wherupon Mr John Forbes thought expedient that Mr John Welsh should goe with him, in respect the Chanceler had most plainly entered his mynd to him anent their proceedings at Aberdein, and of Mr John Forbes's honesty in keeping promise to him therein ; whilk also being known to the Judges, moved them so to write to Mr John Forbes ; who being brought before the CounseU, and Mr John Welsh with him, Mr John Welsh was removed tiU the CounseU should conferr with Mr John Forbes. A long reasoning was betwix the CounseU, then conveened, and him in that matter, the CounseU urging him to prove that whilk he had written, and he defending, that be no reasone or Ew could he be desired to do so in a matter so privat and secreit, whilk he had in sic manner uttered to his Majestie, as is before specifyed, for so sould no man hereafter open up any thing to his Highnesse, although it should greatly concern his honour and peace, if he should find that he be hoved in publick judgment to verify the same ; beside that in that matter, he understood no undutifulnesse in the Chanceler wherefor it should be so tryed ; and, therefore, as for himself, he would na- wayes be his accuser, only he was to answere for himself in any thing they or any man had to accuse him. The CounseU again answered, That albeit he esteemed that whilk he had written of the Chanceler to be no offence, yet his Majestie thought otherwayes, and therefore it behoved him to verify that, lest he should seem to traduce one of his Majestie's speciaU Coun- seUers. Mr John again replyed, That so every thing that any sub ject should write of ane CounseUer might be made ane offence, and so bring the writer in danger of the former guUtinesse, if so be that whatsoever his Majestie should think ane offence it should be so esteemed, and the writer compeUed to answere thereto : alwayes that it was his Majestie's wUl that he should clear the verity of that matter he was content in that form to do it, whUk was ESTATE of the KIRK. 543 most agreeable to the nature of it, and manner of his reveaUing of it, whUk being secreet, he would, be privat information, satisfie his Majestie's mynd in sick sort, as his Majestie should clearly perceive the verity of that whUk he had written ; wherein, if he faUed, he was content that his Majestie should esteem of him as a tra- ducer of his CounseUer and punish him accordingly. The CounseU answered, That it was his Majestie's wiU that that matter should be tryed before them, and that they should report the tryaU to his Majestie ; therefore wiUed him to tell if he would prove it or no. He perceived that no answere would move them to desist from the publick tryall, desired that the Chanceler might be brought before him, that he might confer with Uim, in respect he believed he should deny nothing of that whilk he Ead written, having given sic publick evidence thereof himself so oft before; but this being refuised, upon the affirmation that the Chanceler did deny any conference with him in the matter, and he enquired what way he would prove it ; answered, That since it behoved to be so, his Majestie, and his servitour, Mr William Ewing, had presented their [three] wayes to bim, whereof his Highnesse was content to accept of any one, to wit, either writt, witnesse, or circumstance. The CounseU demanding be which of the three he would verify that matter, he answered, When it came to the actione they should know, but before would not manifest his purpose ; but if he proved not the truth of his writ, his Majestie could judge sufficiently. And directing his speach to the Advocat, who was his accuser, [he] said, That he thought his Lordship might have long since wearyed in accusing the servants of God, alwayes he hoped in God that his Lordship should not obtain bis desire in that matter, more then in his former proceedings ; wherein he himself finding that the sen tences hitherto * pronounced against him and his brethren was no sufficient cover to their malice, nor warrand for the severity in tended and concluded in their hearts against him and his brethrein ; therefor was it that in this particular his Lordship pressed to catch * From this to the end of the sentenced deleted in Swinton's MS. by cross Unes. 544 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE some advantage to his disgrace, thereby intending to make him and that truth, for the whilk he and his brethren suffered, the more odious to all ; yet he trusted that herein, as in aU the former, the Lord should bring his innocency to light, and frustrat the enemies of his truth of their hope. Therefore, according to his last letter sent to his Majestie, he would not directly take in hand to prove the preceding conference, in respect it was secreit, without any witnesse except one, in the Chanceler's own cabinet, wherein he consented to aU that was proceeded in that meeting, and contained in the processe of their AssembUe. But after the AssembUe, he, [Forbes,] having sent information of the form of the proceeding, with ane authentick coppie of the processe, the Chanceler be word aUowed and approved aU that was done; whilk approbation of their proceedings he would prove sufficiently, as done according to the agreement preceding. This his offer being set down in writ after this same manner, and subscribed be him, the 13th of June was appointed for his proofe. And being again demanded be the Advocat, If he would prove the Chanceler's approbation in every particular of their proceedings, as the election of the Moderator, the election of ane Clerk, &c, he answered, He marveUed that his Lordship did propone sic ques tions, if he desired, as he pretended, to have that mater brought to Ught for his Majestie's satisfaction; for thereby it seemed rather that he was willing to cover the evidency of it by some policy, in causing it seem that he had succumbed m his proofe, because he had faUed in clearing the Chanceler's consent to every particular circumstance of that action, albeit he should sufficiently verify his consent to aU in substance. [He] therefore declared he would add nothing to that whUk he had set down ; but whatsoever was contained in that process, whereof they had received ane cop pie, and whUk was the ground of the proceeding against him and his bretheren, and whereof they had some information to his Majestie, he would verify the Chanceler's approbation to it ah. Being again demanded, If he had any farder information to give unto his Majes tie anent the clearing of that matter, he answered, That he would ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 545 declare no furder at that present, albeit he knew furder in that matter, whereof, if it were his Majestie's pleasure, he would give information to his Majestie's seE, to the effect his Majestie might make his use thereof aUenarly ; and would also give his Majestie his opinion how to understand the truth thereof; but he would neither be ane accuser in that particular, nor have himself burdened with probation in judgment thereof, nor have it to come under processe, according as they had brought that particular of his letter to his Majestie. This his last speach he was also caused subscribe, and so with Mr John Welsh was sent to the Castle of Edinburgh, there to be keeped in closse waird, no man having accesse to them untUl the 13th of June. The Lords that did sit on the tryaU of that matter were Montrose, Commissioner ; the Earl of Mar> the Earl of Dum bar, the Lord Fleeming, the Lord Glames, the Lord Newbatle, the Lord of Skoone*, the Collector, and the Advocat ; of whom, albeit some were set to have that matter brought to Ught, yet others, speciaUy the Advocat, was inclined to the contrair, in favours of the Chanceler, and therefore did all that he might to intrap Mr John Forbes, that in something he might seem to have faUed. They who were of the other intention perceiving that Mr John stUl feared thefr pohcy, as though they did intend rather to dis grace him then to harm the Chanceler, and that the most favour able drift they had in that matter was to remove the blame of sic severity as should be used against him from themselves, be mak ing it appear that it did not flow from their deed at LinUthgow so much as from that new occasion ; thereby thinking to recompense the Chanceler, and meet his poUcie with the like ; who, as he had endeavoured to turn over the hatred of the Ministers trouble upon the Earl of Dumbar, in causing him to be sent to be actour in the conviction at LinUthgow, so there, Ukewayes, the Earle of Dumbar, both to disburden himself and [for] recompencing of the Chanceler, did endevour to cause it seem to aU men that it should be for his * Sir David Murray of Gospertie, created Baron Scone in 1605, and Viscount Stor mont in 1621. 2 M 546 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE cause in particular, in his privat revenge, that the [said] severity Should be used against Mr John Forbes ; — they, as said is, per ceiving Mr John to suspect these things, and, therefore, to be more spairing then they would have wished him, and that he fled so far as he might the publick tryaU of that matter, and desired to have liberty be his own presence to satisfy his Majestie, they delt with him to be more fordward, in respect they understood that he was able to prove his aUedgeance sufficiently, having themselves conferred with his witnesses, and heard what they would depone. Yet he, still wUling to shew that form of proceeding, desired that if they would have his Majestie resolved in that matter they would procure his going to Court, that he might inform his Majestie him- seU in the verity of that matter. They, being most desirous of whatsoever form might serve most for clearing that purpose, wiUed himself to write to his Majestie to that effect, and they should convoy it to his Highnesse, and labour be their moyen to obtain his suit. Mr John Forbes, perswaded that if his Majestie was so instant as they pretendit to have that matter tryed, he would easUy condiscend to send for him, and so desirous to try his Majestie's mind before the day, thinking either to stay the publick try aU, or then to obvert aU offence that might therein arise if his Majestie's expectation were not fuUy satisfied, according to the information and assurance he was put in be these men, was glade to embrace that opportunity of making his mynd in that mater known to his Majestie; and, therefore, did write as after foUowes: — Please your Sacred Majestie, * This letter he sent open to the Earle of Dumbar and the Lord Fleeming, that they might read it, and so no wayes offend with that he did ; as also, [that,] being resolved with that whilk he was * This letter is not in the MS. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 547 to doe, they might before hand advise if that would satisfy his Majestie, and so deal either for staying the tryaU or procure his sending for accordingly. They having red it, and being fully satis fied therewith, as containing sufficient to verify the matter in hand, they did post it to his Majestie with the Laud of Burlie ; whilk his Majestie having read, [he] was more incensed against the Chanceler then before. Who, fearing no let in respect the purpose had not framed according to his hope, for he stUl expected that Mr John Forbes should have bein straited with proving .the conference, wherein he assured himself that he would succumb ; but now perceiving that Mr John had not uttered the things that most he feared, and for the whUk he at the first denyed the conference itself; as also that Mr John had taken no more to prove but his verbaU approbation of their proceedings, as done according to pro mise, and so by consequence to clear the conference ; he, knowing very weU that Mr John was able to justify himself in that point [to] his own disgrace, did send to his Majestie, requesting him to procure his favour ; who labouring in his favours, his suit was first repeUed be his Highnesse, but thereafter, be intercession of the Earl of SaUesberry, his Majesty yealded, albeit that matter was proven, to suffer the Chanceler to remain in his office ; and there fore did send home certaine instructions to the Earl of Dumbar with the Laird of Burlie, whereof one concerning that matter was, that he would not have his Chanceler convict in that whilk Mr John did aUedge, because Mr John was ane convict man himseff, neither would he have him put from his office albeit that matter were proven. The Earl of Dumbar, perceiving his Majestie's resolution changed, and so the purpose na wayes like to succeed, thought meit not alto gether to losse the Chanceler's favour since he was not yet to fall, and therefore, by mutuaU intelligence past betwix them, he agreed to convoy the tryaU als far as he might to the Chanceler his advan tage, and to Mr John Forbes prejudice, that it might seem that the Chanceler did not continue in his Majestie's favour, and in his office, so much by grace as merit ; for since it was his Majestie's 2 m 2 548 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE wiU that he should be esteemed innocent, albeit the matter wer proven, he thought it meetest to pleasure the Chanceler, as said is, that thereby it might appear that the Chanceler had obtained that benefeit by his procurement. And to this effect there were two things wherein he yealded to satisfy [the] Chanceler ; the one was that Mr John Welsh, howsoever before aUowed to be ane witnesse, and brought from Blacknesse to that effect, yet he should be stopped unexamined in the tryaU, becaus he was able to verify the Chanceler's approbation of Mr John Forbes's honesty in keeping promise most clearly, and for the doing hereof to excuse himself, to pretend that Mr John Welsh was ane convict persone ; the other thing was, that albeit Mr John should not use the Laird of Leyes* as ane witness, yet, at his requeist, the Earl of Dumbar promised he should be examined in his favours. Thus the day being come of tryaU, Mr John was brought before the CounseU, where many questions were again purposely proponed be the Advocat, to bring Mr John in some snair ; whereunto Mr John did give sic answers as might give no advantage against him self, or they [he ?] refused to answer them at aU, aUedging, he was come there to answere to no new things, but to clear himself of that whilk the last day he was burdened with, and, being reddie to doe the same, he was holden to do no furder. Being enquired how he wald prove that matter, he did give in fower witnesses laufuUy summoned, to bear witnesse in that matter, to wit, Mr James Balfour, Mr Walter BalcanqueU, ministers of Edinburgh, Mr John Welsh and Mr Robert Carcart. And therafter being de sired to declare, If he would give in any circumstances to clear that matter, he answered, " He would use none at that time ex cept one, to wit, the Chanceler's conference with Mmself before the CounseU, the first day of his imprisonment." Being urged be the Advocat to use the Laird of Leyes as one of his witnesses, in respect he understood the secret of that matter best, he an swered, " He would not, in respect he had not taken the con ference directly to prove, but the Chanceler's verbaU approbation * Thomas Burnet of Leyis, in Aberdeenshire. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 549 afterward of the proceechng, wherein the Laird of Leyes could not be a witnesse, being none of them to whom he had uttered the said approbation." The Advocat insisting on that matter purposely, that either Mr John might be compeUed to use him, or then incur some suspicion for refuising him, that his cause was not honest ; Mr John answered, That it was ane new forme of justice, that the pairty to whom probation of a matter was referred, should not have liberty to make choise of his owne proofe, and that the judge should be so partiaUy set, that albeit the matter were sufficiently verifyed, yet if their humor, or rather the humor of the adverse pairty, were not foUowed in the probation, it should be a prejudice to him that proves; [and] he hoped that, in aU indifferent myndes, it should rather manifest the eviU disposition of the judges then any weak- nesse in his cause. But if his Lordship was so desirous to have the matter exactly tryed, for his Majestie's pleasure, as he stiU pretended, he wUled him, and the remanent Lords, to use aU the meanes they thought meet or expedient for the same, to witnesse their duetifulnesse to his Majestie. As for him, in that whilk he had taken to prove, he would use sic witnesses as he pleased himseU ; and seeing in doing so, he prejudged more himself then the Chanceler, he thought his Lordship should nowayes be grieved thereat. Hereafter Mr John again desired to have the Chanceler brought before their Lordships, that he might confer with him ; but this being again refused, the witnesses are aU fower caUed. Mr John Forbes, hearing them caUed, desired the Lords to send their warrand to the Castle for Mr John Welsh, in respect, without the same, he could not be suffered to come and give his testimony ; whereat the Clerk (being at the doore) retumuig, aUedged, ane masser was directed. Thus Mr John, before the witnesses cam in, is removed, [and] neither the Chanceler nor he brought to see their oath taken. Mr James Balfour and Mr Walter Balcanquell in their depo sitions agreed both in one, conform to that whilk Mr John Forbes 550 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE had written to his Majestie ; * for Mr John, before his writing to his Majestie, understanding of them the conference betwix the Chanceler and them, did so write as he knew of themselves they would testify in judgment. Mr John Welsh was past unsent for, or examined, according to the paction betwix the Chanceler and the Earl of Dumbar. Mr Robert Carcart deponed, That he heard not aU that was bewix the Chanceler and Mr John Welsh, but that he heard him enquire, " If ane act was made against the Commissioners ?" And Mr John assures him, there was none, and to clear that he saw him take ane written processe and present to the Chanceler ; after the whilk he heard the Chanceler say, " E there was no more done there was the less fault done, or thereby in sic hke tearms." After the examination of thir witnesses, Mr John was caUed in again, and being enquired, If he would use any farder proof? He answered, That for that time he would use no furder probation then he had given in aEeaddy. Whereupon he is sent again to the Castle, not knowing tiU he was come out, that Mr John Welsh was not examined. After his departure the Laird of Leyes is examined in favours of the Chanceler, who confessed the conference and his presence thereat, and that. there was a promise but that there should be no Assemblie holden there. The matter being tryed, and by the deposition of Mr James Balfour and Mr Walter BalcanqueU clearly proven, as likewayes, (albeit somewhat obscure) be Mr Robert Carcart's, — and the Laird of Leyes deposition, albeit given m favours of the Chanceler, ma king the matter more evident, — yet according to his Majestie's direction to the Earl of Dumbar, the report was caused passe, that nothing was proven against the Chanceler. Hereupon, in the hearts of many even weU affected, yet igno rant of the truth, great offence was. taken, for encreasing whereof, the evil disposed and the Chanceler's favourers did spread in all places the most vile and odious calumnies upon Mr John Forbes * From this to the end of the sentence is deleted in the MS. Ji: ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 551 that their mahce could devise ; the DevUl and his instruments hereby taking occasion to make the sufferings of him and his brethren to be the lesse esteemed, and their cause the less regarded, and their persons the more despised ; the hearts of the best sort being greatly confounded, esteeming aU things to have been according to the open bruit. Mr John Forbes did patiently bear aU things, commiting his cause to God, who dayly did clear his innocency be bringing the truth to light, and making it known how dewtifuUy he had -behaved himself from the begining of that action, even towards his greatest enemies ; whilk being known to the Chanceler, who feared more the things that he concealed, then all that was uttered, he purposely did speak favourabUe of Mr John Forbes before his weUwiUers, and caus ed his friends so to do, that he might be stayed from declaring the secreits of that conference, albeit to others baith him and his friends did manifest their mahce towards him; always nothing served so much to testify Mr John his innocency, as his Majestie's sUence in that matter, after the receit of the processe caryed to Ms Highnesse be the Lord Fleming ; who, perceiving the deposi tion to agree with Mr John Forbes own writing, was stayed from useing that as ane advantage against him, to put his purpose in execution. So Mr John remained in the same cace he was in before, it being certain, if the reports had been trew that were spread of him in that eirand, sic ane occasion would not have bein shpped, when be all means, directly and indirectly, a pretence was sought against him, to rid the land of him, either be death or banishment. This opinion did hold the hearts of aU weU affected men in ane suspense, tUl God did more clearly manifest the truth. Mr John, in this meantime, albeit greatly aUured be others, and provocked be the Chanceler's mahce, yet did not suffer himself, by the one or other, to be overcome, so as to utter any thing to the Chanceler his prejudice, albeit he might have many wayes pro cured his disgrace. 552 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE cap. xni.* SOME MINISTERS SENT FOR BY HIS MAJESTIE. — THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY STILL SHIFTED. — A PETITION SENT BY THE WARDED MINISTERS, AND A PROTESTATION BY SOME OTHER .MINISTERS TO THE PARLIAMENT OF PERTH, BUT NOT PRESENTED. — SOME ARTICLES PENNED BY THEM. — WHAT MATERS WERE CONCLUDED AT THE PARLIAMENT OF PERTH. — A PETITION SENT FROM THE WARDED MINISTERS TO THE KLN&, AND A LETTER TO THEIR BRETHREN GOING TO COURT. About the latter end of June 1606, the King sent for some of the Ministers to come to him against the 15th day of September nixt foUowing. The persons sent for were these : Mr Andrew MelviU, Mr James MelvUl, Mr James Balfour, Mr WiUiam Scot, Mr WUUam Watsone, Mr John CarmicheU, Mr Robert WaUace, Mr Adam Colt, Mr Henry PhUipe ; of the which, the first eight were known to be of the most learned, wise, faithfuU and upright in the land, and thus most opposite to aU the wickednes of the Bishops and Commissioners ; the last being of another disposition, was purposhe, (as it was thought,) sent through the pohcie of Mr James Nicolson, to the end, that being ui company with the others, he might be acquainted with their mind, and give intelligence thereof to the King and to the Bishopes and Commis sioners. But this poUcie being perceived, the danger was pre vented by the others refusing to have hun in theE companie. The first [thing] that was secrethe aymed at, was thereby to find out a fair excuse for adjournuig againe of the GeneraU Assembhe, appointed by pubUck proclamation to be keeped the last Tuesday of Julij nixt foUowing, in Dundie ; which was shortly manifested by another proclamation, forbidding the said AssembUe in Dundie, * This and Chapter xiv. are suppUed from Gibson's MS. Neither of them is con tained in Swinton's MS. ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 553 and ordaiiung it to be keeped at Perth the first Tuesday of Maij 1607. The copie of the Proclamation followes : — " James, by the grace of God," &c. * What further kvtention and secrete purpose was under this poUcie it wUl be manifest by the successe and event of things foUowing. The resolution of altering the government and disci pUne estabUshed in the Church was aEeady evident to aU men, as in the Parliament keept at Perth, the King's supremacie over aU persons, in aU causes, was much advanced and openlie inacted, and the Bishopes restored to the same estate that they were in before the yeare of God 1552. To this ParUament came divers of the best affected ministers, and penned a Protestation f to be presented to the Estates assembled. Likewise, the Ministers in ward sent a Petition for their releas ing out of prison, with an Eistruction to the Estates in ParUament of the Griefes whereof they complained, and which they humbly desired to be considered and redressed. The Petition foUowes : — " Right," &c. [See this Petition m Calderwood's History, vol. vi. pp. 548-551.] Neither of these was presented to the ParUament, because the Bishopes and Commissioners fearing such things, procured a decree of CounceU, that nothing should be received concerning the Church save that which was presented by the Commissioners of the GeneraU AssembUe. Thus they closed the way from aU their brethren, that nothing could come from them to the knowledge of the Estates. The brethren assembled, perceiving that there was no way but by the Commissioners to have their petitions dehvered, * This Proclamation is not contained in the MS. t See this Protestation in Calderwood's History, vol. vi. pp. 485-491. It is sub scribed by 42 ministers. 554 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE were compeUed to deale with them, who outwardlie pretended an earnest desire to. concurre with them in aU things concerning the good of the Church, but nevertheless they refused to dehver their Protestation, and the Petitions and Griefes of the unprisoned Mi nisters. Whereupon, Mr Peter Blakburne, Mr Patrick Symson and Mr WiUiam Cowper, being of a contrarie opinion to the rest, agried to deliver their afflicted Brethren's Petitions ; which, being perceived, a new remedie was found by the others to frustrate their purpose, which was, that nothing should be delivered by any two or three of the Commissioners, but only by Mr Patrik GaUo way, their Moderator, as speaker of the whole number. These three ministers being thus hindered, resolved to labour with Mr Patrik Galloway, to present the Petitions ; who at length consented thereto, and to that effect, being come to the place where the Parliament was keept, Mr James Nicolson entering at that same time, and hearing of their purpose, stayed Mr Patrik GaUoway from delivering any such thing, so that nothing at aU of the ministers affaires came to the knowledge of the Parliament. The Ministers assembled there for the good of the Church, finding no other remedie, did penne four Articles, and desired the Commissioners to dehver them to the Court of Parhament. The Articles were as foUowes : — * In this Parhament t was layed the foundation of that antichris tian tyrannie and overthrow of aU true Christian government in the House of God, wherein the least part was not the Bishopes and Commissioners ; who also consented to the erection of seaventeen Abbacies and Priories, consisting for the most part of tithes, into temporaU Lordshipes, to such Noblemen and new Lordes as there by might be brought to consent to these three things required in Parliament, all three tending to the high dishonour of God, the bondage of the Church and Kingdome, and utter ruin both of Reli- * These Articles are not in the M S. t On tho 11th of July 1606. (Acta Pari, Scot. vol. iv. pp. 281, 361.) ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 555 gion and Commonwealth. The first was, The King's supremacie over aU persons in aU causes, a prerogative belonging to none save Jesus Christ alone, to whom only aU power and aU judgement is geven of the Father. The second was, The estabhshing of Bishopes, as hath been said, so that neither the Church nor the kingdome should be without a note of Antichristianisme, in the highest degrie repugnant to the royaU dignitie of the Sonne of God. The third was, A subsidie of 400,000 Markes Scotish, to recompence the King's losse sustained in erecting the said Bishopes, although it was not so pretended but for paying of some of his debtes. Thus, in this Parhament was that solemne Covenant sworne and sub scribed by his Majestie and the whole Estates openlie violated and broken by them aU, which cannot passe unpunished of God, who never suffered the taking of his name in vaine, in such an high degree, to passe without an open manifestation of his wrath, in measure answerable to so great a sinne. About the 20th of August, the forenamed Brethren sent for by the King, tooke journey to Court, and besides them, four Bishopes and four Commissioners, for whom also his Majestie had written secretlie. The going of these two last caused aU good men expect the lesse good of that voyage. The imprisoned Ministers, for the fuU discharging of their dutie, thought it expedient to send with their brethren their Petition to the King, containing a plaine declaration of their mind in the things then controverted, and of the wrongs they suffered, and their afflictions; together with a copie of their Griefes, sent by them to the ParUament. The Peti tion was as foUowes : — [See this Petition in Calderwood's History, vol. vi. pp. 563-566.] 556 CERTAINE RECORDS TOUCHING THE cap. xrv. THE COPIE OF HIS MAJESTIE'S LETTER TO THE COUNCELL OF SCOTLAND, CONCERNING THE SENTENCE TO BE PRONOUNCED AGAINST THE IMPRISONED MINISTERS. The King's Majestie, having at length resolved touching the warded Ministers, thought it most expedient not to use them with all extremitie of punishment, but only to banish them out of Scot land, and so be rid of them for ever. Whereupon he sent this letter foUowing to the CounceU : — " James Rex, " Whereas in our Justice Court, keept at Linlithgow the 10th of January last bypast, Mr John Forbes, minister at Awford ; Mr John Welsh, minister at Air ; Mr Robert Durie, minister at An struther ; Mr Andrew Duncan, minister at CaraiU ; Mr Alexander Strauchen, minister at Creich ; Mr John Sharpe, minister at KU- many ; were convicted of the crime of Treason, for their contemp tuous and treasonable rejecting the judgment of us and the Lordes of our Privie CounceU simpliciter, by a Declinator sub scribed with their hands, and given in by them in judgment before the said Lords of our CounceU, as in the said process of conviction, at more length, is contained ; and the pronouncing of the sentence being by our Lord Justice, upon grave and weighty respects, de layed tUl our further pleasure were knowen therein : We now, considering the great insolencie of that proud contempt, and what dangerous example it might be, if it should passe unpunished, having, out of our accustomed lenitie, geven to these declared Traitors more then sufficient time to have implored and made humble sute for our mercie ; yet finding nothing in them but a continuing obdured obstinacie and wUfulnes, without Ukehhood or appearance of amendment or repentence in them, for their former committed foUies ; and albeit the greatness of their offence, and ESTATE OF THE KIRK. 557 specially in men of that caUing, whose fives should be lantemes and fights to others, to carie themselves in aU duty and obedience ; and therefore their oversights, requiring the more severe animad version and punishment, hath most justly merited the extremitie of the rigour of the law to be inflicted upon them, for an example, to terrifie all others from attempting the like : Nevertheles, be cause hitherto that law hath never been put in execution, whereby some men may perhapes pretend that they had the more probable ignorance thereof, aUbeit, in reason, the same can be no excuse, We have, of our wonted clemencie, upon that respect only, spared to umict the rigour of the law at this time ; it being our wUl and pleasure that our Lord Justice, or his deputies, should appoint and affix a Justice Court, to be keept at LinUthgow, or any other place else that you shaU think expedient, upon the 23d day of October nixt to come, and there cause sentence to be given out against the said traitors, to be banished out of aU our dominions during aU the dayes of their naturaU Uves, upon paine of death ; and the sentence being pronounced, our wUl and pleasure is, that they be taken backe againe to prison, there to remaine for the space of one moneth, to prepare \hemselves for their departure ; [before the expiry whereof, if they do not depart, *] wind and weather serving, our wUl and pleasure is, that the ordinarie death usuaUy inflicted upon traitors be directed to be executed upon them ; and if they shaU not depart within the said space, or being departed, shaU returne into our dominions without our Ucence, they shall incurre the paine of death, and aU other paines due to persons convinced of treason. Wherefore these presents shall be to our said Lord Justice a sufficient warrand. And because this, our gentle dealing and great clemencie, extended toward those above named offenders, in this their so heinous a crime and offence, may perhaps move in some others some presumption to think, that for trespasses of this kind no greater rigour could be hereafter used ; for removing of which their foolish opinion and * These words are supplied from another copy of this letter. 558 CERTAINE RECORDS, &C. conceit, and that everie one may take notice of our fuU determi nation in any such like case hereafter, Our wUl and pleasure is, that, in our said Lord Justice his court, to be keept the said day for pronouncing of the said sentence, speciaU intimation be made in open court, by our said Lord Justice, to aU our Ueges then present, that it is our resolution, that if any shah hereafter offend in such an high trespasse, they shall be used with aU severitie, and that the death due unto traitors shaU be inflicted upon them, with aU rigour ; the example of this our present lenitie at this time, never remaining any motive to induce us to shew any such clemencie to such as shaU commit the hke offence hereafter. And Our wiU is, that these presents be recorded in the Books of AdjournaU, and that publication be made hereof at the Market Crosse of Edenburgh, and aU other places needfull. Geven at Hampton Court, the 26th of September 1606. " to his trustie and wel-beloved Councell of Scotland." The effect of this Letter was duely fulfiUed,* and the Ministers being banished out of aU the King's dominions, were dispersed in divers forreign countreyes ; the particular relation whereof might perhaps seeme too tedious unto the Reader, and, therefore, I wiU here make an end of this pitifuU Historic * That is, at the Justice Court held at LinUthgow, on the 23d October 1606, there was pronounced a sentence of perpetual banishment, under pain of death, out of aU the King's dominions. (Pitcairn's Criminal Trials, vol. Ui. p. 503.) INDEX. Abbacies annexed to the Crown, 56. Abbeys according to the First Book of DiscipUne to be overthrown, 9. Abbot, Dr George, Bishop of London, consecrates three Scotch Bishops, 234. Abbots, 27, 46. Abercrombie, James, Lord, 149. Abernethie, John, minister of Jedburgh, afterwards Bishop of Caithness, 123, 198, 244, blamed for calumny, 305. Abernethie, Mr Thomas, comes to keep Aberdeen Assembly after it was dissolved, 136, 396; appears before the Council, 423 ; refuses at first to acknowledge that Aberdeen Assembly was unlawful, but afterwards yields, 138, 424. Absolution, 36, Adamson, Mr John, minister of Libberton, 126, 243. Adamson, Mr Patrick, his three sorts of Bishops, 25 ; presented to the bishoprick of St Andrews, 40 ; proceedings of the General Assembly against him, ib. ; is suspended, 50; sits in ParUament, 51; bis Declaration of the meaning of the acts of Parliament 1564, and of the King's intentions, 52 ; is excommunicated by the Synod of Fife, 54 ; is delated, 56 ; endeavours to subvert the Presbyterian government, 350 ; causes to be torn out of the Register of the Assembly, acts made against the estate of Bishops, ib. ; his poverty and sickness, 59 ; requests to be absolved from the sentence of ex communication, which is granted, ib. ; his recantation and confessions, 59, 352, 383. Aird, John, 248. Aird, William, 102. Alexander, John, 248. Allan, Mr Andrew, 263. Andrews, Dr Lancelot, Bishop of Chi chester, 170, 203. Angus, Earl of, excommunicated and banished, 65 ; Church proceedings in reference to, 90, 202. Angus, Superintendent of. See Erskine, John. Appeal from inferior to superior Church Courts, 12. Arran, Earl of. See Stewart, Sir James. Arbuthnot, Mr Alexander, Moderator of the General Assembly, 32. Archdeans, 27, 46. Argyle, Bishop of, 278. Argyle, Earl of, 170. Argyle, Superintendent of. See Carswell, John. Arthur, William, 26,248; visits ministers imprisoned in Blackness, 455. Assemblies, General, 10 ; held at first twice in the year, 1 1 ; not moderated by Su perintendents, 17; Voters in, 18; mat ters brought before and decided by, ib. ; part of their business committed to Synods, 1 8, 19 ; Act of Parliament, 1 592, ratifying them, 59, 60 ; how often to be held 61 ; efforts to suppress them, 126. Assembly, General, an extraordinary one at Perth, and its proceedings, 89, 90, 356, 357; its difference from preceding As semblies, 91, 92 ; Questions of the King to it, 357, 358; he requires it to meet with the Estates, 358; Protestation of the ministers in reference to this, 358, 359; General Assembly at Dundee in 1597, and its proceedings, 93, 100-106, 360, 364 ; a Protestation against its law fulness, 366; Assembly prorogued by proclamation, 164; again prorogued, 195; again prorogued, 196; again pro rogued, 197; Assembly at Linlithgow, 201-206, 241; Assembly again delayed, 218; Assembly held at Glasgow in June 1610, whieh overthrows the Presbyte rian Discipline, 221-232; Proclamation for ratification of the Acts of that As sembly, 232; its Act against the liberty of the Church corrupted, and its rati fication by Parliament, 237. 560 INDEX. Assembly, General, held in 1605 at Aber deen, 131-139; Commisioners chosen for it, 386, 387 ; they come to keep it on different days, 387 ; the reason of this, 384, 385 ; a letter of the Council to the Assembly requiring its dissolution, 388, 389; Assembly's procedure in re ference to this letter, 390 ; Laureston protests against the lawfulness of the Assembly, 390, 391 ; Forbes's counter protestation, 391 ; Laureston's charge to the meeting to dissolve, ib. ; which is dissolved, 392 ; Ministers answer to the Council's Letter, 394, 395; the Council ordains letters of horning to be issued against all who were at the Assembly, 402 ; Supplication of Minis ters to Council, 406 ; Ministers who appeared before the Council, 406, 407 ; the Assembly condemned by the Commis sioners of the Church, 407 ; the Ministers last mentioned imprisoned in Blackness, ib. ; injustice of the proceedings against them, 408; these proceedings condemned by many Ministers from their pulpits, 409 ; Ministers imprisoned in Blackness brought a second time before the Coun cil, ib. ; King's " Declaration" refuting the defence of the Ministers required to be read from the pulpits, which is re fused, 410 ; King's Questions to be pro posed to the Ministers, 410, 411 ; the Lord President sends a deputation to them and their answer to it, 412,413; they compear before the Council, 414; their answers to the King's Questions, 414, 415 ; are sent back to prison 416; Declaration of their Proceedings for clearing their innocence to the King, 418 ; other ministers concerned in the keeping of Aberdeen Assem bly are brought before the Council, 423 ; a few of them confess the unlawfulness of that Assembly, and are sent home, 424 ; others remain constant and are imprison ed, ib. ; Supplication given in to the Coun cil in behalf of the ministers imprisoned in Blackness, 424, 425 ; the King, Coun cil, Bishops and Commissioners of the Church all unite against the Ministers, 426 ; the design of the Court to bring them to a trial, 427 ; they are summoned, 428 ; their Supplication to the Council, 429 ; they decline the authority of tho Council in Ecclesiastical matters, 151, 432, 434 ; attempts to bring them to satisfy his Majesty and their offers, which are refused, 437, 438; their Petition to the Council, 439 ; three sup plications presented in their behalf which are refused, 440 ; Petition prepared by Mr William Scot to be sent to the King in their behalf, 440-44 2 ; Mr Hall speaks publicly against them, 443 ; letter of the Ministers in Blackness to the Presbytery of Edinburgh in their own vindication, ib. ; the Ministers there send another Petition to tbe Council, 444, 445 ; the Presbytery of Edinburgh resolve to send to the King the petition prepared by Mr Scot as their own, 446 ; ihe Ministers in Blackness send a Petition to the King, 447-449 ; they also send a Petition to the Council, 449-451 ; Mr Forrester sent to them to desire them to acknow ledge an offence, 452 ; their answer, ib. ; put to a trial by jury, 148, 149, 452,453; reason why the Court was not held at Edinburgh but at Linlithgow, 454 ; en deavours to make them acknowledge a fault, 454, 455 ; visited by various of their brethren, 455 ; are conveyed from Blackness to Linlithgow, 455, 456 ; find many of their brethren at Linlithgow, who accompanied them to the bar, 149, 455, 456; means used to induce them to take back their Declinature, and the Ministers answers, 456-461; the Minis ters resolution not to take back their DecUnature approved of by their brethren at Linlithgow, 461, 462 ; Lords of Privy Council who assist the Lord Justice at the trial, 463 ; the Ministers arraigned, 463, 465; the libel, 466, 467; their Advocates defences, and answers of the Lord Advocate, 467-472 ; the Ministers explain before the Court the meaning and amount of their Declinature, 473, 474, 475 ; interlocutor of the Lord Jus tice for their passing to trial by jury, 475; Lord Holyroodhouse and John Preston, CoUector, dissent from it, ib. ; names of the jury, 476 ; Lord Advocate's address to the jury, 477-479; speeches of Forbes and Welsh at the bar, 480- 492 ; effects of these speeches, 492, 493 ; the Ministers are desired to lift their De clinature that the process might stop, which they refuse to do, 494 ; tbe jury threatened, ib. ; a verdict of guilty re turned, 495 ; names of the jury who condemned and of those who absolved the Pannel, ib. ; pronouncing of the sentence delayed till the King's pleasure should be known, 155, 496 ; method taken by the King, after their conviction, to accom- INDEX. 561 to acccomplish his designs, 155; illegality of the procedure, 154; effects of the ver dict returned on the Lords, 496 ; beha viour of the Ministers, ib. ; effects of the proceedings throughout the country, 498, 499 ; the King resolves to try other eight Ministers, 503 ; against which he is dissuaded by the Council, ib. ; deputa tion sent to the Ministers by the Lord Comptroller and the Ministers' answer, 506, 507 ; they send a letter to the King with Mr William Irving, 508 ; the Council's proclamation, prohibiting Ministers from publicly condemning the proceedings against the condemned Ministers, 514, 518; Grievances of the Synod of Lothian and Tweeddale in re ference to this Proclamation, 519, 520; the Proclamation without effect, 522 ; the Letter of the Minsters of the French aud Flemish Churches in Lon don to the Presbytery of EdinBurgh, respecting the imprisoned Ministers, 156, 525-531 ; the Ministers answer, 532 ; their Petition to the Estates of Parliament, 553 ; King's Letter to the Council as to the sentence of banish ment to be pronounced upon them, 555- 557; they embark at Leith, 178; the Convention at Linlithgow lay upon the Ministers themselves the blame of their banishment, 183 ; falsehoods and mis representations of a tract, entitled " Declaration," &c, published by the Council in vindication of their proceed ings against the Ministers, 385, 386, 996-400, 465, 522, 523. Assembly, General, held at Aberdeen in 1616, the real and pretended reasons for holding it there, 240, 241 ; its pro ceedings, 241-245. Athol, Earl of, 29. Balcanquhall, Mr Walter, protests against the Acts of Parliament of 1584, 51, 153 ; withdraws to England, 52 ; ap pointed to meet with the Council of the Kirk, 69; publishes from the pulpit the proceedings between the King and the Octavians, 83 ; confesses his fault in being incredulous of the King's state ments as to tho Gowrie Conspiracy, 116; the King's determination to have him transplanted, 120; his interview with the Lord ChanceUour after the meet- 2 ing of Aberdeen Assembly, 402, 512, 540, 548, 549 ; his sympathy with the Ministers imprisoned for holding that Assembly, 409, 540. Balfour, Andrew, 249. Balfour, Mr James, appointed to meet with the Council of the Kirk, 69 ; col league of Robert Bruce, 106 ; admits his fault in being incredulous of the King's statements as to the Gowrie con spiracy, 116; the King's determination to have him transplanted, 120; is sum moned to Court, 165, 194, 552; sub scribes roll of June 1617, 248; his in terview with the Lord Chancellor after the meeting of Aberdeen Assembly, 402, 512, 540, 548, 549 ; his sympathy with the Ministers imprisoned for holding that Assembly, 409, 442. Ballenden or Bannatyne, Adam, minister of Falkirk, 123 ; attends the trial of the Ministers at Linlithgow, 148, 456 ; be comes Bishop of Dunblane, 180, 205, 239, 263, 278. Balmerinoch, Lord, Secretary to King James VI., and President of College of Justice, 67, 83, 110, 149, 152; sup posed to be opposed to the Estate of Bishops, 426 ; sends a Minister to the Ministers imprisoned in Blackness, to desire them to acknowledge a fault in holding Aberdeen Assembly, 451 ; afraid to proceed against them, 452 ; rejoices at their conviction, 496 ; Bi shops jealous of, 501; intrigue against, 501. 502. Baptism, private, 244. Barclay, David, minister of St Andrews, sentence pronounced against him in the High Commission, 281 ; subscribes Protestation against Perth Articles, 292 ; gets access to the Parliament where the Articles were to be ratified, 295 ; protests against the Act of Par liament ratifying these Articles when proclaimed at the market cross of Edin burgh, 298. Barlow, Dr WiUiam, Bishop of Rochester, 170. Basilicon Doron, 110. Bell, Mr John, minister of Cather [Cal- dcr], attends the trial of the Ministers at Linlithgow, 456. Bellarmine, Cardinal, 203. Beza, Theodore, his opinion of the office of Bishops, 26, 27 ; his Treatise of Divine, Human, and Satannical Episco pacy, 42. N 562 INDEX. Biggar, Mr Thomas, Reader at Kinghorn, cited to appear before the High Com mission for not subscribing the Articles of Perth, 299. Binning, Lord. — See Hamilton, Sir Tho mas. Birnie, Mr William, minister of Lanark, afterwards at Ayr, 211, 244; attends the trial of the Ministers at Linlithgow, 456. Bishops, their office not considered by the Scotish Reformers of Divine appoint ment, 5 ; manner in which Bishops en tered their usurped office, 7 ; Bishops and Archbishops to be subject to the General Assembly, 22, 23 ; acts for re straining the power of Bishops, 30, 31; laws concerning their election, 33 ; de lations against, ib.; report of Assembly's Committee as to the Divine authority of Bishops as then existing in Scotland, 33, 34 ; this report approved of by the General Assembly, 35 ; Bishops re quired to take the charge of a particular congregation, 35, 37 ; Acts of General Assembly with regard to, 37, 38 ; office condemned simpliciter by act of Assem bly, 38, 39, 347 ; Assembly's Cautions as to Bishops not observed, 130; the Cautions desired to be inserted in the Act of Parliament to be made, confirm ing the Estate of Bishops, 157 ; Pro testation given in to the Lords of Articles against the restoration of the Estate of Bishops, 159 ; Act of Parliament re storing it, 163; the Bishops efforts to carry forward their measures, 199 ; they grow more powerful, 216 ; Scottish Bishops consecrated, 234, 235 ; the Bishops become more intolerant, 240 ; double power possessed by, ib. ; their visitation of Kirks, 242 ; some of them non resident, 326 ; Act of Parliament in 1633 intended to ratify acts made in favour of the Estate of Bishops, 338. Bishops, three Popish, who professed the Reformed religion, 15 ; had no power to exercise jurisdiction by virtue of their old office, 16 ; appointed to act as Com missioners in their own bounds, ib. ; complaints and proceedings against, 16, never chosen to moderate at the Gene ral Assembly, 17. Bishops of England, General Assembly's letter to, in favour of the brethren who were troubled on account of the sur plice, 19. Bishopricks annexed to the Crown, 56. Black, Mr David, Minister of St An- drews, appears before the Council and declines their authority in ecclesiastical matters, 71, 72; this considered a com mon cause by the Church, 72, 75, 79 ; his Declinature sent to every Pres bytery and numerously signed, 72 ; again summoned to appear before the Council, 73; new Declinature, 74; his courage, wisdom, and utterance before the Council, 75 ; the King wishes him to confess an offence, which he refuses, 76 ; is willing to submit the matter to a lawful ecclesiastical court, 77 ; the libel against him found proven, ib. ; pujiishtnent the King intended to inflict upon him, 76; speeches said to have been uttered by him against the King, ib. ; is banished, 79, 90 ; Synod of Fife appoint some of their number to deal with the King to restore him to his" own place, 87 ; suffered to return to St Andrews, 92 ; removed from St Andrews by the Commissioners of the Church, 95, 361 ; this approved of by the Assembly at Dundee, 364. Black, William, 248. Black Saturday, 100. Blackburn, Mr Archibald, minister of Aberdeen, a member of Aberdeen As sembly, 128, 133, 387, 393 ; appears before the Council, 138, 423 ; is in duced to confess the unlawfulness of that Assembly, 138, 424. Blackburn, Mr Peter, Bishop' of Aber deen, 58, 100, 112, 116, 123, 128, 553. BlackhaU, Mr Andrew, 126. Blyth, Mr Henry, minister of the Can- ongate, Edinburgh, 248 ; committed prisoner to the Castle of Blackness, 409 ; continued in prison notwithstand ing a warrant from the King for his re lease, 420 ; released from prison, 437. Brodie, Mr Gilbert, a minister of Orkney, 103. Book of Common Prayers, 243, 245. Boyd, Mr Andrew, Bishop of Argyle, 123. Boyd, Mr James, accepts the Bishoprick of Glasgow, 29 ; Moderator of the General Assembly, 32 ; delated for in- frequency of preaching, 39 ; his death, 49. Boyd, Mr Robert, admitted Principal of the University of Edinburgh, 806 ; op position made to him by the ministers of Edinburgh, 307. INDEX. 563 Brand, Mr John, minister of Holyrood- house, 30. Brown, Mr Gilbert, a seminary priest, apprehended and committed to Edin burgh Castle, 422 ; released from pri son, 436. Bruce, Mr Edward, Commendator of Culross, 356. Bruce, Mr Robert, appointed to meet with the Council of the Kirk, 69 ; ap pointed to present certain articles to the King and Council, 74 ; refuses farther communing with the King tiU the Commissioners of the General As sembly be recalled, 82 ; his exhortation in reference to swearing in defeflcc of religion, 83 ; his interview with the King, 83 ; his advice to the people, 84; reasons against ministers having vote in ParUament, 102; urged with imposition of hands which he refuses, 106; his doubts in reference to the alleged Gowrie conspiracy, 116 ; his banishment from Edinburgh, 123; com mitted to ward in Inchgarvie, 409 ; his death, 124. Buchanan, George, 13. Buchanan, Mr Thomas, 91, 93, 101, 107. Buckridge, Bishop, 170. Bullinger, his Treatise touching the Ap parel of Preachers, 19. Burnet, James, 248. Caithness, [Robert Stewart] Popish Bishop of, embraces the Protestant religion, 15; appointed Commissioner of Caithness, 16 ; assists in the admission of John Douglas as Bishop of St Andrews, 25. Caithness, Bishop of. See Forbes, Alex ander. Calderwood, David, the Historian, 198, 248-250. Campbell, Mr Neil, Bishop of Argyle, 58. Canons, Ecclesiastical, 243, 245. Caprintoun, Laird of, 48. Carmichael, Mr James, 51, 233, 234. Carmichael, Mr John, 102, 116, 123; attends the trial of the ministers at Linlithgow, 155, 456, 462 ; commis sioned by the Lord Comptroller to visit the Ministers imprisoned in Blackness, 506 ; summoned to Court, 165 ; per mitted to return home, 194, 198 ; Bishops opposed to his having liberty to attend the General Assembly, 201, 205 ; 2 his reasonings at a meeting called by Spottiswood at St Andrews, 271. Carnegie, Sir David, afterwards Earl of Southesk, 67. Carswell, John, Superintendent of Argyle and the Isles,-6 ; rebuked by the General Assembly, 17. Cartwright, Mr, his remarks on funeral sermons, 4. Cathedral Kirks, 46. Cathkine, James, warded in Caithness, 280, 308. Ceremonies, Views of the first Reformers as to, 9. Cesfurd, Laird of, 85. Chalmers, George, 248. Chalmers, John, 248. Chancellor, Lord, Alexander Seaton. See Dunfermline, Earl of. Chancellors, 27, 46. Chanters, 46. Chapters, 22-24, 27, 33, 46, 163, 246. Charles I., hopes of redress of Grievances on his Accession to the Throne, 313 ; shows his determination to proceed in the same course with his Father, 313, 314; sends a direction to the Council of Edinburgh that none should be chosen as magistrates but such as were con form, 314 ; requires the Lords of Session and others to communicate in his chapel, ib. ; some Bishops and ministers go to him to consult about kirk rents and ministers stipends, 315 ; Scot's re marks on this, 315, 316 ; other Commis sioners associated with the above, 316 ; grievances given in to Charles, 321-326; grievances to be presented to him and the Estates of Parliament, 330-334; supplication presented to him, 335. Cheisly, John, 248. Christison, Mr William, minister of Dun dee, 12 ; Moderator of the General As sembly, '17. Clapperton, John, 123. Cock, Mr William, 12. Cockburn, Sir John of Ormiston, 356. Cockburn, Sir Richard, 149. CoUace, Francis, 248. College Kirks, 24. Colt, Mr Adam, 126 ; summoned to Court, 165, 194, 552. ColvUle, Mr Robert, minister of Culross, 248 ; visits the Ministers imprisoned in Blackness, 455. Commendators, 46. Commissioners for Provinces, occasion of their appointment, 10; nature of their N 2 5G4 INDEX. office, ib ; difference between them and superintendents, 1 1 ; their power limit ed, ib. Commissioners to the General Assembly, law as to their number, 106. Commisioners of the General Assembly meet at Edinburgh, 69 ; charged by au act of Privy Council to depart out of town, 74; this charge proclaimed, which they obey, 80 ; Robert Bruce refuses farther communing with the King till they be recalled, 82. Commissioners, or commission appoint ed to sit with the King about Church affairs, 94 ; the needle which drew in Episcopacy, 94, 95, 361, 373, 383; they petition Parliament in name of the Kirk, that ministers may have vote in Parliament, 96, 362 ; receive more am ple powers, 101 ; carry forward the wishes of the King, 116, 117, 363, 365, 372 ; their usurpation complained of, ,129, 130; opposed to the meeting of Aberdeen Assembly, 131. Communicating, or observing the Lord's Supper in private, 252. Comptroller, Lord. See Scoonet Lord. Confession of Faith, first Confession rati fied in Parliament, 4 ; its doctrine con cerning ceremonies, 9 ; second Confes sion of Faith, subscribed by the King and his household, 46, 347 ; approved of by the General Assembly, 47 ; the subscription of it enjoined, ib. ; sub scribed in 1590, by persons of all ranks a second time, 56 ; Act of the Presby tery of St Andrews as to subscription of, 166 ; a new Confession drawn up, 243 ; which is intended to set aside the old one, 245. Constant Moderators of Presbyteries and Synods, 164, 183, 184; the Synod of Perth refuses to accept of a constant Moderator, 185, 186 ; Act of Assembly at Linlithgow in regard to Constant Moderators and its adulteration, 185, 187-193, 241 ; opposition to them in the Synod of Fife, 187; in the Synod of Lothian, 188; in the Synod of Merse and Tweeddale, ib. ; and in other Synods, ib. ; attempt to settle them in Presbyteries, 196. Constant Platt, 94, 101, 121, 122. Convention at Leith, claims the power of a General Assembly, 2 1 ; appoints Com missioners to meet with Commissioners of the Council, 22 ; proceedings of these combined Commissioners, 22-24 ; Ge neral Assembly appoints a committee to sit with Knox to revise and consider the conclusions of that Convention, 26 ; Ge neral Assembly disapproves of the pro ceedings of that Convention, 27. Convention at Linlithgow, 177-185; its act with regard to Constant Moderators, 185, 187 ; fruit of this Convention, 188. Convention at Falkland 199-201. Cornwall, Mr Robert, 499. Council of the Kirk. See Commissioners of the General Assembly. Covenanting takes place in 1596, 66; re solution to engage in, 84. Cowper, Mr WUliam, minister of Perth, afterwards Bishop of Galloway, 68 ; bis sermon before the Estates of ParUament, 158; his letter to the Bishop of Dun blane, 194 ; member of Privy Confe rence, 205 ; reports the King's approval of the Assembly at Linlithgow, 206 ; his opinion of the Assembly at Glasgow of 1610, 232; in a sermon sets at nought the ancient order of the Kirk, 260 ; preaches in the royal chapel, 254 ; his death, 238. Craig, Mr John, 13 ; Moderator of the General Assembly, 17, 22, 33, 347. Craig, Mr Thomas, Advocate for the Church, 149, 453, 464, 493. Cranstoun, Mr MitcheU, minister of Cra- mond, visits the Ministers imprisoned in the Castle of Blackness, 455. Cranstoun, Mr William, 188. Cubiculars, 83, 84. Cunningham, Daniel, 278. Cunningham, Mr David, Bishop of Aber deen, endeavours to subvert the Presby terian government, 350 ; castrates the Assembly's Register, 351. Davidson, Mr John, minister of Libber- ton and afterwards of Prestonpans, 51 ; effect of his exhortations, 66 ; his letter to the General Assembly, 93 ; his opposition to Ministers voting in Parliament, 99, 102, 103; his Pro testation against the lawfulness of the Assembly at Dundee of 1597, 104, 366 ; which is refused to be inserted in the Assembly's Register, 366 ; his letter to the Assembly which met at Burntisland in 1601, 1 18, 1 19 ; the King refuses to grant him relief from his con finement, 124, 126. INDEX. 565 Davidson, Mr William, minister of Rathen, member of Aberdeen Assembly, 133, 387, 3931 appears before the Council, 423 ; is induced to confess the unlawfulness of Aberdeen Assem bly, 424. Deans, 27, 46. Dickson, Mr David, minister of Irvine, threatened by the Bishop of Glasgow for his opposition to Perth Articles, 299 ; appears before the High Commis sion, by which he is banished to Turriff, 300-302 ; goes to Turriff, 302 ; his De chnature, 303, 304. Dickson, Mr John, merchant, Edinburgh, charges Mr William Forbes with speak ing in his sermons in favour of Popery, 307 ; summoned to compear before the Lords of Council, 308 ; ordained to enter into the jail of Edinburgh, 309 ; deprived of his office as elder, 311 ; promises to communicate according to Perth Articles, ib. ; ordained to re-enter the jail of Edinburgh, 312; released, ib. ; the King's death puts an end to his trouble, 313. Dickson, Mr Richard, 126 ; cited to ap pear before the High Commission for his opposition to kneeling at the Lord's Supper, 268. Discipline, First Book of, ministers who drew it up, 4 ; treatment it received when presented to the Lords, ib. ; is rat'Sed by act of Council, 4, 347 ; registered in Books of Assembly, 347 ; not intended to be strictly observed in all time coming, 5. Discipline, Second Book of. See Policy. Discipline of the Kirk, King's Questions concerning, 87 ; Synod of Fife ordain its Presbyteries to appoint Commission ers to meet for answering them, 87 ; answers resolved on, 88. Dounam, Doctor, 201. Douglas, Mr Alexander, Bishop of Mur ray, 101, 112, 123, 381. Douglas, George, minister of Cullen, 244. Douglas, Sir James, 149. Douglas, Mr John, one of those appointed to draw up the First Book of Discipline, 4 ; presented to the Bishoprick of St Andrews, 20 ; inhibited to vote in Par liament in name of the Kirk, ib. ; Knox refuses to inaugurate him Bishop of St Andrews, 25 ; admitted by the Super intendent of Fife, ib. ; still continued Rector of the University and Provost of the New College, 26 ; unqualified through age for so many charges, ib. ; delated for various causes, 28 ; his death, 29. Douglas, William, 248. Drummond, Mr Ninian, attends the trial of the Ministers at Linlithgow, 456. Dunbar, Earl of, a cubicular, 83; sent down from Court to try six of the Mi nisters who held Aberdeen Assembly, 148, 149, 152 ; sent down by the advice of the Chancellor and Lord President, 453 ; endeavours to bring the Ministers to confess a fault, 454 ; Forbes's speech to him at the bar, 490-492 ; his joy at the conviction of the Ministers, 496 ; determines to be revenged on the Chan cellor and President for being sent on that errand when he perceives how un popular it made him, 498, 499, 513, 514 ; sits on the trial of the Chancellor, 157, 545 ; wishes to acquit the Chancel lor, upon perceiving that such was the King's desire, 547 ; is again at Court, 165, 167, 170, 171, 179, 184, 188, 200, 211, 224; his death, 235. Dunbar, Mr George, minister of Ayr, 248, 300 ; his boldness before the High Commission, 303, his Declinature, 303, 304. Duncan, Mr Andrew, minister of Crail, a member of Aberdeen Assembly, 133, 387, 392 ; goes to visit Forbes when imprisoned, 404 ; appears before the Council, 137, 407; sent prisoner to Blackness, ib. ; declines the Council's authority in Ecclesiastical matters, 140; put to the trial of a jury, 148 ; banished, 556, 558; cited to compear before the High Commission, 269 ; de prived and warded, 270 ; after his sen tence gives in an admonition, ib.; presents a Supplication of some Ministers to the Clerk of Register, 282, 283 ; is brought before the Council, 284 ; his letter to the Bishop of St Andrews, 305 ; the Bishop's answer to it, 306. Duncanson, Mr John, 32, 102. Dunfermline, Alexander Seaton, Earl of, Lord Chancellor, one of Octavians, 67, 83; his interview with John Forbes previous to the meeting of Aberdeen Assembly, 385 ; breach of his promise to Forbes, 388, 389 ; his interview with Welsh, 401, 402; and with Messrs Bal four and Balcanquhall, 402, 403; his connection with the prosecution of rhe Ministers for holding Aberdeen Assem bly, 152, 420, 451, 452, 496; suspected 566 INDEX. by the Bishops, 426, 501 ;' intrigue to displace him, 501, 502, 538-544; his trial, 568. Dunkeld, Bishop of. See Paton, James. Durie, John, minister of Edinburgh, 33. Durie, Mr Robert, minister of Anstruther, a member of Aberdeen Assembly, 133, 387, 392 ; goes to visit Forbes when imprisoned, 404 ; compears before the Council, 137, 407 ; commanded to enter himself prisoner in the Castle of Blackness, ib. ; declines the authority of the Council in Ecclesiastical matters, 140; put to the trial of a jury, 148; banished, 556, 558. Dykes, Mr John, 110, 188, 455. E Earls, the forefaulted, complaints of the Kirk in reference to, 66 ; danger arising from their return, 69 ; controversy between the King and the ministry re specting them, 81, 82, 85. Echlin, Mr Robert, minister of In verkei th ing, visits the Ministers imprisoned in Blackness, 455. Edinburgh, Ministers of, eharged by the King and Council to depart out of Edin burgh, 115; their places declared vacant by the Commissioners of the General Assembly, 116; the King declares their Churches must be open to all the Bishops, 217; dispute between them and their congregations in reference to the celebration of the Communion at Easter, 267 ; they endeavour to incense the King against their people, 268; complain of the deprived and silenced Ministers entering the city, 31Q; sup plicate the King to dispense with obedi ence to the act of kneeling at the Lord's Supper, 319. Edinburgh, the people of, opposed to the Bishops, 157; supplicate the King to allow the Sacrament of the Supper to be celebrated as before the Perth Arti cles, 319. Edinburgh, tumult in, 355. Election of Ministers, to be in the congre gation according to the First Book of Discipline, 8 ; mode of trial previous to induction, 8. Elpbingston, Alexander, Lord, 149. Elphingston, Sir James, one of tho Sena tors of the College of Justice. See Bal- merinoch, Lord. England, 300 Ministers there suspended, deprived or excommunicated, 125. Episcopacy ratified in England, 1 25. Errol, Earl of, excommunicated and ba nished, 65 ; returns, 68 ; Church proce dure with, 90, 202, 207 ; is set at liber ty, 235. Erskine, John, Laird of Dun, Superintend ent of Angus and Mearns, 6 ; his letter to the Earl of Mar, 20 ; deprives the Principal and Regent of Old Aberdeen College of their offices, 14, 22 ; is Mo derator of the General Assembly, 32. Erskine, Mr WUUam, minister of Demno, 232, 243, 244, 281, 379. Estate, Third, Ministers denied to be such by the Reformers, 9 ; Knox's opinion, ib. Excommunication, 36. Excommunication. Treatise of, 13, 14. Exhorters, 5, 12; ignorant and immoral persons said to be admitted as, 13 ; their office declared by the Assembly not to be an ordinary ecclesiastical office, 39. Fairfoul, John, minister of Dunfermline, 107 ; confined to Dundee on account of his praying for the banished and impri soned Ministers, 217. Fairholme, or Ferme, Mr Charles, minis ter of Fraserburgh, a member of Aber deen Assembly, 133, 387, 393 ; appears before the Council, 137, 423; declines tbe Council's authority in Ecclesiastical matters, 140; refuses to acknowledge the unlawfulness of Aberdeen Assembly, 424 ; imprisoned in the Castle of Down, 138, 424. . Ferguson, Mr David, Moderator of the General Assembly, 32 ; his opposition to ministers having vote in Parliament, 99. Ferguson, Mr John, minister of Ochiltree, cited to compear before the High Com mission, 278 ; his DecUnature, 279, 280. Ferme. See Fairholme, Charles. Fife, Superintendent of. See Winram. Fife, the Synod of, 138; discharged to meet, 186; attempt to make Archbishop Gladstanes Moderator of, 187; Grie vances of, given in to the General As sembly, 370, 371 ; the Ministers of the North send commmissioners to, 379. Fleming, John, Lord, 167; is gained over ' by Spottiswood to join with him in dis gracing the Chancellor, 502, 513 ; sits on the trial of the Chancellor, 545. INDEX. 567 Fleming, John, merchant in Edinburgh,807. Forbes, Alexander, Bishop of Caithness, afterwards Bishop of Aberdeen, 123, 242, 381. Forbes, Mr John, minister of Alford, sent by the Synods of Aberdeen and Murray as Commissioner to the King, in refer ence to their proceedings against the Earl of Huntly, 382; his favourable reception, ib. ; promises to the king to endeavour to promote the peace of the Church, 383; his interview with the Lord Chancellor previous to the meeting of Aberdeen Assembly, 385 ; the Chan cellor's breach of promise to him, 388, 390 ; a member of Aberdeen Assembly, 133, 387, 392 ; chosen Moderator, 134, 388; testimony given by the Lord Chancellor to his fidelity, 402 ; comes from the North to Edinburgh, 403 ; summoned before the Council, 136, 403; committed prisoner to the Castle of Ed inburgh, 404 ; accused by the Chancel lor of breach of promise to him, 405, 406 ; removed to the Castle of Black ness, 137, 406 ; appears before the Council, 139, 414; put to the trial of a jury, 148; his speeches at the bar, 153, 154, 480-484, 488-492; Forbes and Welsh considered most hopeless, 418, 426, 497 ; Forbes writes to the King with regard to the interview between him and the Lord Chancellor, 512 ; pro ceedings against the Chancellor in con sequence of that interview, 512-514, 538-551. Forbes, Lord, 83, 85. Forbes, Patrick, Laird of Corse, expresses his readiness to accept of the Bishoprick of Aberdeen, 254 ;' his opinion as to Perth Articles, 294. Forbes, Mr WiUiam, minister of Edin burgh, charged with preaching in favour of Popery, 307, 308. Forbes, Mr William, minister of Kinbethok, a member of Aberdeen Assembly, ) 33, 387, 392 ; appears before the Council, 423, 138; refuses to acknowledge the unlawfulness of Aberdeen Assembly, 138, 140, 424, imprisoned in the Castle of Stirling, 138, 424. Forrest, Alexander, 248. Forrest, Sir John of Carden, one of the jury in the trial of the Ministers for holding of Aberdeen Assembly, 476 ; his remorse for the part he took in this, 532. Forrester, Mr Andrew, minister of Dun- fermlino, 451. French, James, 249. Funeral Sermons, discountenanced by the First Book of Discipline, 4, 9. Galloway, Mr Patrick, 51 ; protests against the permission granted to the Earl of Huntly to return, 67 ; sent as Commissioner to the King to Falkland, 68 ; appointed to meet with the Council of the Kirk, 69; commissioned to the King, ib. ; bis freedom with the King, 71 ; appointed to present certain articles to the King, 74 ; desired by the King to come to Linlithgow, 87 ; his pains as to answering the King's Ques tions respecting the discipline of the Kirk, 88, 102 ; sends a copy of the Conference at Hampton Court to the Presbytery of Edinburgh, 125; written to when at Court by the Presbytery of Edinburgh, 127 ; Moderator of the General Assem bly, 133, 135, 142; Commissioner of the General Assembly, 136, 377, 379, 384, 387, 403, 501 ; his sermon in time of Parliament, 158; desired to preach at the Convention of Linlithgow, 180; a member of Privy Conference, 205 ; appointed to assist in drawing up a catechism, 243, 244 ; dissuades the King from setting up the statues of the twelve Apostles in the Royal Chapel, 246 ; doubtful part of his conduct, 247 ; subscribes the roll of June 27, 1617, 248 ; acknowledges to the King his fault in doing so, 251 ; his advice in regard to private communicating, 252 ; inveighs against the people for the few ness of his hearers on Christmas day, 267. Galloway, Popish Bishop of. See Gordon, Alexander. Galloway, Bishop of, 278. Garden, Mr Gilbert, Moderator of the General Assembly, 17. Geneva, The Kirk of, King James expresses his preference of the Kirk of Scotland to, 57. See Order. Gibb, James, 152. Gladstanes, George, Archbishop of St Andrews, 58 ; admitted minister of St Andrews, 95, 361 ; a member of the Commission appointed to sit with the King, 101, 102, 107, 112; nominated to vote in Parliament, 116; chaUenged by the Synod of Fife for sitting inParliament, 568 INDEX. 117; becomes Bishop of Caithness, 123, 126 ; sent for to Court, 166, 167 ; made Archbishop of St Andrews, 186, 187, 194, 381 ; opposition of Mr John Murray, minister at Leith, to him, 197, 205; goes to Court, 217 ; commission given to him to hold two courts of High Commission, 218; holds a Diocesan Synod, 232 ; intends to hold a Diocesan Synod of Lothian in Haddington, 233 ; is declined by the Presbytery of Had dington, ib. ; is consecrated at St Andrews, 235 ; his letter to the King, 236. Glammis, Patrick, Lord, 149. Glasgow and the West, Superintendent of. See Willock. Glencairn, Earl of, 170. Goodman, Christopher, minister of St Andrews, 12. Gordon, Mr Alexander, Popish Bishop of Galloway, embraces the Reformed reli gion, 15; seeks to be appointed Super intendent of Galloway, ib. ; appointed Commissioner of Galloway, ib. ; delated, 1 6 ; proceedings against, 1 7 ; discharged to exercise any function in the Church, 29 ; submits to the Church and is partly restored, 30. Gordon, John, of Buckie, 242. Government of the Church, Presbyterian form of, adopted by the first Scottish Reformers, 47. Gowrie, Earl of, 50, 115. Graham, Mr George, Bishop of Dunblane, 58, 123, 130; succeeds to the Bishop rick of Orkney, 239. Gray, Mr Thomas, one of the Advocates who defended the cause of the ministers imprisoned for Aberdeen Assembly, 149, 152,453,464. Greig, Mr James, minister of Colmonell, comes to Aberdeen Assembly after it is dissolved, 136,396; appears before the Council, 137, 423 ; refuses to acknow ledge the unlawfulness of Aberdeen Assembly, 138, 424 ; imprisoned in the Castle of Dumbarton, 138. Grier, Mr George, minister of Hadding ton, 248, 256. Grievances of Presbyteries against the Commissioners of the General Assem bly, 100; Grievances agreed upon by the Synod of Fife to be presented to the General Assembly at Holyrood- house 1602, 120, 121,370-372; Grie vances of the Synod of Lothian and Tweeddule presented to the Council, 519, 520 ; tbe Chancellor's answer to them, 521 ; Grievances of the eight Ministers at the Court in London, 176; Grievances given in to Charles I., 321- 326 ; Grievances given in to the Con vention of Estates in 1630, 327 ; are supported by several noblemen, 328; Grievances in May 1633 to be presented to the King, 330-334. Guild, WiUiam, 248/ Gunpowder Plot discovered, 439. Haddington, Earl of. See Hamilton, Sir Thomas. Halket, Sir Robert, 138. Hall, Mr John, minister of Edinburgh, his admission of error in connection with the Gowrie conspiracy, ] 16 ; a secret ad vancer of the King's interest, 116, 117, 200, 359 ; earnestly dealt with by the Synod of Fife to write to the King for hastening a General Assembly at Aber deen, 127, 424 ; joins with the Privy Council in proceedings against the Minis ters who kept Aberdeen Assembly, 403, 406 ; refuses to subscribe a peti tion to the King in favour of the im prisoned Ministers, 442 ; speaks pub- Uckly to their prejudice, 443, 449 ; has a hand in drawing up certain articles favourable to Bishops, to be proposed to Synods, 501 ; accepted as Constant Moderator by the Presbytery of Edin burgh, 184; a member of Privy Con ference, 205 ; obtains a pension from the Crown, 224, 268 ; appointed to assist in drawing up a catechism, 243, 244 ; dis suades the King from setting up in the royal chapel the images of the twelve apostles, 246 ; subscribes the roll of June 27, 1617, 248; acknowledges to the King his fault in doing so, 251. Hamilton, Gavin, appointed one of the Commissioners to sit with the King, 101, 123; made Bishop of GaUoway; 381, 156, 206 ; sent up to Court, 207 ; consecrated at London, 234 ; succeed ed in his Bishoprick by Mr William Cowper, 238. Hamilton, James, 278. Hamilton, John, apothecary, 308 ; sum moned to compear before the Lords of Council, ib. ; condemned to be confined within the town of Aberdeen, 309 ; obtains prorogation of his confinement, INDEX. 569 311 ; ordained to enter the jail of Edin burgh, 312 ; after nineteen days im prisonment is released, ib. ; tbe King's death puts an end to his trouble, 313. Hamilton, Patrick, 248. Hamilton, Mr Robert, Minister of St Andrews, 15; Moderator of the Gene ral Assembly, 32. Hamilton, Sir Thomas, the King's Advo cate, afterwards Lord Binning and Earl of Haddington, one of the Octavians, 83 ; his concern in the trial of the Ministers for holding Aberdeen Assembly, 139, 149, 403, 496 ; at Court in London, 167, 169-171 ; becomes Secretary for Scotland, 237 ; is King's Commissioner at Perth Assembly of 1618, 293 ; pro motes the passing of the Five Articles at that Assembly, 261, 262, 268, 293,296 ; his death, 313. Hampton Court, Conference appointed to be held at, in 1604, 125 ; Conference held at, in 1606, 167-177. Harlow, Nathaniel, subscribes the Confes sion of Faith, 126 ; comes to keep Aber deen Assembly after it is dissolved, 136, 396; not troubled on account of it, 424. Hart, Mr WiUiam, 149, 152. Hay, Sir Alexander, his Majesty's Secre tary for Scotland, 171, 177, 218, 237. Hay, Mr Andrew, Commissioner of Clydes dale, 22 ; Moderator of the General Assembly, 32. Hay, Doctor, Minister of Peebles, 278. Hay, Mr George, Minister of Turriff, Moderator of the General Assembly, 17 ; Commissioner of Caithness, 33, 205, 244. Hay, Theodore, 249. Helvetia, the General Assembly approve the Confession of, with the exception of holy days, 1 9. Henderson, Mr Abraham, comes to keep Aberdeen Assembly after it is dissolved, 136, S96 ; not troubled on account of that Assembly, 424. Henderson, Mr Alexander, minister of Leuchars, 317. Henderson, Patrick, 249. Hepburn, Mr Edward, 244. Herries, Robert, 249. Hermannus, his speech to Cassander, 271. Hewat, Mr Peter, 101, 126, 243, 247, 249, 411. High Commission, two Courts of, 199, their power, 218-221 ; the two Courts united into one, 239 ; the stronghold of the Bishops, ib. ; the Bishops summon Ministers before these Courts, before being heard either in Presbyteries or Synods, 326. Hog, Mr Thomas, summoned to appear be fore the High Commission for his op position to Perth Articles, 269 ; Grie vances presented by him to Sir John Hay, 330 ; presents a Supplication of the Ministers to Charles I., 335. Holyroodhouse, Lord, is sent by the King to calm a tumult in Edinburgh, 85 ; pre sent at the Synod of Fife, 187 ; opposes the trial of the Ministers who held Aber deen Assembly, 475. Home. See Hume. Hope, Mr Thomas, Advocate, defends the cause of the Ministers tried for Aber deen Assembly, 149-151, 453, 464. Howie, Doctor Robert, Principal of St Mary's College, St Andrews, 105, 112, 123, 180, 205, 232, 244, 384. Howison, John, 123. Hume, Alexander, of Rentoun, 152. Hume, Gavin, of Johnscleugh, 152, 155. Hume, Sir George, of Broxmouth, 83, 152. Hume, George, of Deanes, 152. Hume, Sir John, of North Berwick, one of the jury on the trial of the Ministers for holding Aberdeen Assembly, 152, 476 ; desires the Lord Justice to define the matter committed to them for trial, 493 ; his remorse, 432. Hume, Sir Patrick, of Polwart, one of the jury on the same trial, 152, 476 ; wishes to be excused from serving on the trial, 492. Huntly, the Earl of, excommunicated and banished, 65 ; returns secretly, 67 ; it is declared lawful for him to return, ib. Church procedure with, 90, 202, 207, 235,240, 242, 381. Huntly, Lady of, 70. Imposition of hands, 8. Informations to the Estates of Parliament, urging them not to ratify Perth Assem bly and its acts, 285-289. Inglis, James, 248. Inglis, John, warded in the burgh of Mon trose, 281. Inglis, Mr Nathaniel, comes to keep Aber deen Assembly after it is dissolved, 1 36, 396; appears before the Council, 138, 423 ; refuses to acknowledge the unlaw- 570 INDEX. fulness of Aberdeen Assembly, 138, 424; imprisoned in the Castle of Dumbarton, ib. ; declines the authority of the Council in Ecclesiastical matters, 1 40, Innerwick, Laird of, 124. Irving, Mr James, minister of Touche, a member of Aberdeen Assembly, 133, 387, 393 ; appears before the Council, 138, 423; refuses to acknowledge the unlawfulness of Aberdeen Assembly, 138, 424 ; imprisoned in the Castle of Stirling, 138, 424 ; declines the Coun cil's authority in Ecclesiastical matters, 140. Irving, Mr WilUam, carries letters from the Ministers imprisoned in Blackness to the King, 502, 508-511, 513, 514, 533-537. meeting of the General Assembly, 364, 366, 370 ; after his succession to the English throne is moved by additional causes to attempt the overthrow of Presbytery, 373 ; supports Bancroft, 375; his death, 313. Jamieson, WilUam, 249. Johnston, George, minister of Ancrum, 198 ; cited to compear before the High Commission, 305 ; deprived, ib. Johnston, Mr John, Professor of Divinity in St Andrews, 100 ; debarred from Assembly held at Dundee in 1597, 105. Johnston, Simon, 248.. Jurisdiction of the Kirk, 1 9 ; anxiety of the General Assembly to draw the line of demarcation between it and the civil jurisdiction, 19, 32; Convention to be held at Perth for consulting and deter mining upon, 87. Justice, William, 248. James VT. is persuaded to take the government into his own hands, 42 ; invited to Ruthven by Gowrie and others, who remove from him such as favoured the Duke of Lennox, 49 ; in his majority his subscription to the Con fession of Faith is required anew, 56 ; his encomium on the Church of Scotland, 57 ; finds fault with Ministers for medd ling with state affairs in the pulpit, 70 ; present at Assembly of Dundee in 1598, 104 ; his great desire to have Ministers to vote in Parliament, 110, 112, 113, 115, 118, 119, 124; powder treason against, 148 ; his speeches to the eight Ministers summoned to Court, 167 ; his questions to them, 168; offers at the altar, 170 ; Archbishop Gladstanes letter to, 236 ; present at a meeting of the High Commission in St Andrews, 249, 250 ; his letter expressing his will that the Five Articles of Perth should be enacted, 253 ; resolves to have the Communion celebrated at Edinburgh at Easter, according to the act of Perth, 312 ; acts made in favour of the Re formed religion in his resign, 346 ; be gins to dislike the Presbyterian form of Church government, 849 ; the Octa vians prejudice him against the Presby terian Ministers, 355 ; the first time he altered the diet and place of the Gene ral Assembly, 356 ; he attempts to make the whole government and order of the Church dependent on his will, 358, 363 ; alters the time and place of the Keith, Alexander, 249. Ker, John, 126, 233, 248, 456. Ker, Sir John, of Littledean, 124. Kinnear, Mr John, 232. Kneeling at the celebration of the Lord's Supper, opposition of the people of Edinburgh to, 267, 268 ; some noble men and others communicate kneel ing in the Royal Chapel, 246 ; Com munion observed in sundry cathedral kirks by Bishops kneeling, 254. See Perth, Articles of. Knox, Andrew, Bishop of the Isles, 101, 123, 371. Knox, John, the Reformer, minister of the English Congregation at Geneva, 3 ; appointed to assist in drawing up the First Book of Discipline, 4; admits Spottiswood to the office of Superinten dent, 7 ; admits Mr James Lawson to the ministry in Edinburgh, 8 ; his sen timents on ministers holding civil places, 9 ; success of his ministry, 11 ; ap pointed to visit certain kirks, 13 ; de lays the admission of Mr Alexander Gordon to the office of a Superinten dent, 1 5 ; refuses to inaugurate John Douglas as Bishop of St Andrews, 25 ; this said to arise from malcontentment, which charge he rebuts, 26 ; not at the Convention of Leith, ib. ; his burial, 28. Knox, Mr John, minister of Melrose, 101, 123, 205, 504, 505. INDEX. 571 Knox, WiUiam, 248. Lamb, Mr Andrew, Bishop of Brechin, 123, 167; consecrated at London, 234, 403. Lamb, James, 248. Laud, Archbishop, procures Mr John Maxwell's elevation to the Bishoprick of Ross, 318. Laureston, Sir Alexander Straiton of, King's Commissioner for Kirk affairs, 129, 142, 376, 377, 380 ; strongly op poses, in the Synod of Fife, the holding of the Assembly appointed to meet at Aberdeen in July 1605, 131, 381 ; ex cites the Council to discharge the Synod of Aberdeen from proceeding against the Marquis of Huntly, 381 ; sends let ters to Presbyteries to stay the meeting of Aberdeen Assembly, 384, 385 ; pre sent at the opening of that Assembly, 133, 134, 144, 387, 388 ; presents the Coun cil's letter to it, 388 ; protests against the lawfulness of the Assembly, 135, 390, 391 ; his forged proclamation pro hibiting the meeting of it, 136, 401 ; gives it in to the Council, 402 ; in con sequence of which letters of horning are issued against the ministers who kept the Assembly, ib. Law, Mr James, Bishop of Orkney, and afterwards Bishop of Glasgow, 123, 124, 381 ; challenged for seeking to over throw the discipUne of the Kirk, 126 ; at Court, 167; his threatening to the Presbytery of Jedburgh, 1 98 ; chosen Moderator of the General Assembly, 201, 202, 211; goes to Court, 217; brings Ministers from his Diocess in Orkney to attend the General Assembly at Glasgow in 1610, 224 ; a remark of his at a Diocesan Synod, 229 ; inaugu rated Bishop of Glasgow, 238 ; his power, 239, 269, 272, 278, 324, 381. Lawson, Mr James, minister of Edin burgh, 8, 33 ; withdraws to England, 52. Lawson, Richard, warded in Aberdeen 281. Lennox, Matthew, Earl of, Regent, his death, 20. Lennox, Esme Stewart, Duke of, trouble some to the Church, 49 ; he is forced to leave the country, ib. ; his death, 50. Leslie, Mr George, minister of Strath- miglo, 12. Leslie, Mr John, Bishop of the Isles, 123. Lethington, Secretary, quarrels with ministers for holding the General Assem bly without the Queen's allowance, 18. Lindores, Abbot of, 170. Lindsay, Alexander, minister of St Ma- does, and afterwards Bishop of Dun keld, 101, 123, 180, 185. Lindsay, Mr David, minister at Leith, 13 ; Moderator of the General Assembly, 17 ; Commissioner of Kyle, 22, 23 ; becomes afterwards Bishop of Ross, 58, 123 ; protests against the permission granted to the Earl of Huntly to return, 67, 69 ; commissioned to the King, 69, 72; appointed to present certain articles to the King, 74 ; Moderator, but with out election, of the Extraordinary As sembly at Perth in 1597, 89, 147 ; member of General Commission to sit with his Majesty, 101 ; nominated to vote in Parliament, 116; appointed to be visitor of Ross, 120; one of the Commissioners for treating of the Union of Scotland with England, 126 ; his great age unfits him for his duties, 209, 210 ; at the Council when the Ministers prosecuted for Aberdeen Assembly ap peared before it, 423. Lindsay, Mr David, minister of Dundee, and afterwards successively Bishop of Brechin and of Edinburgh, 196, 244, 261, 263. Lindsay, Mr John of Balcarras, 67, 83. Lindsay, Mr Patrick, Bishop of Ross, and afterwards of Glasgow, 58, 123, 316. Lindsay, John, Lord Secretary, suspected of having a hand in the framing of the book, entitled, " The King's Questions, &c, to the General Assembly," 356. Linlithgow, Alexander, Earl of, 149. Liturgy, 243. Livingston, Henry, minister, 101, 185, 248, 456, 462. Livingston, Sir John, of Dunnipace, one of the jury on the trial of the Ministers for holding Aberdeen Assembly, 152, 476 ; declares his determination to act on the trial according to his conscience, 154, 493 ; acquits the prisoners, 155. Livingston, Robert, of West-quarter, one of the jury on the same trial, 152 ; ac quits the prisoners, 155. Livingston, Thomas, of Panton, one of the jury on the same trial, 152 ; acquits the prisoners, 155. 572 INDEX. Livingston, Mr William, cited to compear before the High Commission, 278 ; compears, 278, 279 ; his Declinature, 279, 280 ; appointed by the Ministers of Edinburgh to present a Supplication to the King in reference to kneeling at the Lord's Supper, 320. Livingston, Lady, 70. Lords of the Articles, 51, 162; make an act which virtually gives the King su preme power in the government of the Kirk, 246. Lothian, Superintendent of. See Spottis wood, John. Lumsden, Charles, 248. Lundie, Mr William, 22. M Mackghie, Mr Andrew, minister, 126,233. MacgiU, Mr David, a Senator of the Col lege of Justice, 156. MacgiU, Mr Gavin, minister, 126. MacgiU, Mr James, Register Clerk, 22. Maitland of Lethington. See Lethington. Malcolm, Mr John, minister of Perth, 232 ; summoned to appear before Spot tiswood, 238. Malcolm, William, 123. Mar, David, Notary, 128. Mar, John, Earl of, chosen Regent, 20 ; sent by the King to calm a tumult in Edinburgh, 85 ; an assessor to the Judge at the trial of the imprisoned Ministers, 149. Martin, Mr Alexander, 265. Martin, James, 105. Mat tho! us Tortus, a work of Cardinal Bel- larmine, so entitled, 203. Maxwell, Mr John, Bishop of Ross, 123, 317, 316; known to be incUned to Ar- minianism and Popery, 318, 320, 321. Mearns, Mr David, minister of Carnbeo, 232 ; confined within his own parish by the High Commission, 281. Meiklejohn, Robert, warded in Dunkeld, 281. Mein, John, merchant, Edinburgh, warded in Wigton, 281 ; the Bishop writes to the Council in his favour, ib. ; desires the Lord's Supper to be observed in the old manner and not according to the Articles of Perth, 308 ; summoned to compear before the Lords of Council, ib. j condemned to be confined within tho town of Elgin, 309 ; charged to enter his place of confinement, 311; re turns from Elgin to visit his family, 312. Melville, Mr Andrew, 33, 34; withdraws to England, 51; protests against permission being granted to the Earl of Huntly to return, 67 ; his speech to the King at Falkland, 68 ; detained from the As sembly at Perth in 1 597, 90 ; conference between him and the King, 93 ; Act passed by the King and Commissioners of the General Assembly with the view of excluding him from Church Courts, 96 ; his opposition to ministers having vote in Parliament, 99 ; debarred from the Assembly at Dundee in 1597, 105 ; restraint laid upon him, 113 ; tbe King refuses to grant him relief from his con finement, 124; attends the imprisoned Ministers at their trial at Linlithgow, 456 ; accompanies them after their trial on their way to Blackness, 155; charged to depart from the Parliament House, 163; summoned to Court, 165, 552; questioned by the King as to the lawful ness of Aberdeen Assembly, 168 ; his answer, 168,-171 ; his epigram on seeing the King and Queen offer at the altar, 170; called before the Coun cil of England on account of it, 178 ; sent to the Tower, 194 ; fear which the Commissioners of the Church had of him, 233 ; his words in reference to the Earl of Dunbar, 235. Melville, Mr James, writes against the Acts of Parliament of 1 584, 52 ; his con futation of Bishop Adamson's complaint and appeUation, 54 ; protests against permission being granted to the Earl of Huntly to return, 67 ; commissioned to the King, 68, 69, 72 ; perceives James Nicolson's change of views, 88 ; his own determination of fidelity, ib. ; opposed to the meeting of the Assembly at Perth in 1597, 89; present at that Assembly but withdraws secretly, 90 ; hostile to minis ters having vote in Parliament, 99, 102 ; lays some extracts from Basilicon Doron before the Synod of Fife, 110; mem ber of Privy Conference, 112; his letter to the General Assembly at Burntisland in 1601, 117; his Protestation, 120; ex presses his sympathy with the Reformers in England, 125; his Apology for the imprisoned Ministers, 141 ; visits those imprisoned in Blackness to attend them on their trial, 455, 462, 499, 503; accompanies them after their trial on their way to Blackness, 155 ; summoned to Court, 165, 552; his speech to the INDEX. 573 , King, 167 ; the opinion he gave to the King as to Aberdeen Assembly, 169 ; examined, 170; his Answers to the King's Questions, 172; charged to re main in Newcastle, 194. Melville, Sir Robert, 149. Melville, Mr WilUam, a Senator of the College of Justice, 106. Mercer, John, 248. Mill, Mr James, a member of Aberdeen Assembly, 387, 393. MiUar, Mr Joseph, Advocate, summoned to compear before the Lords of Council, 308. Ministers, Act of the General Assembly in 1562 concerning such as had not entered their charges orderly, 1 2 ; such as were ignorant and immoral said to be admit ted by Superintendents, 13 ; are pro hibited from becoming Senators of the College of Justice, 31 ; advantages of parity of power among, 62-64 ; articles to be subscribed by them at their entry, 265, 266 ; may not lawfully sit in Par Uament, 97, 98 ; vote in Parliament granted to, 98 ; evil effects of this per ceived, 99 ; Ministers ordained to wear black gowns, 218; act concerning ap parel of, 339-341. Ministers of the North, arts of Courtiers upon, 88 ; success of these arts, ib. ; more favourable to Episcopacy than Ministers of the South, 103, 240 ; some of them well affected to the good cause, 129. Ministers who were summoned to Court, 165 ; they advise with Presbyteries and Sessions how to carry themselves, 166 ; are admitted into the King's presence, 167, 168; hear Sermons at Court, 170 ; Articles as to which they were required to give in answers, 171 ; their answers, 172-175; their grievances, 176; they suppUcate the King for liberty to return to their flocks, 177; their treatment, 194. Mitchel, Mr David, minister of Edinburgh, and afterwards Bishop of Aberdeen, leans to Arminian and Popish sentiments, 320, 321. Mitchelson, Mr John, minister of Burnt island, 205, 232, 244. MoUison, Mr Thomas, Notary, 128. Monroe, Mr George, minister, 123. Monroe, Mr George, minister of Tain, a member of Aberdeen Assembly, 133, 134, 387, 393 ; appears before the Council, 136, 423 ; refuses to acknow ledge the unlawfulness of Aberdeen As sembly, 424 ; imprisoned in the Castle of Down, 138, 424; signs the Declina ture, 140. Montgomery, Mr Robert, minister of Stir ling, appointed to the Bishoprick of Glasgow, 49 ; endeavours to subvert the Presbyterian Government, 350 ; pro ceedings of the Church against, 49 ; his excommunication, which the King and Council declare to be null and void, ib. ; seeks to be reconciled to the Kirk, 49 ; sits in ParUament, 51 ; satis fies the Kirk, and is declared by the As sembly admissible to a Kirk, 56. Montrose, John, Earl of, 149, 152, 180, 184, 403, 502. Morton, James Douglas, Earl of, com mands Douglas, Bishop of St Andrews to vote in Parliament in name of the Kirk under pain of treason, 20 ; Chan ceUor, 22 ; takes up a great part of the Bishop of St Andrews rent in feus, &c. 26 ; chosen Regent, 28 ; craves addi tional Bishops, ib. ; the gift of the Bishoprick of Glasgow is purchased from him by Mr James Boyd, 29 ; craves that some learned men in the ministry may be Senators of the College of Jus tice, 3 1 ; the General Assembly's humble supplication to, 32 ; not pleased with the Second Book of Policy, 42, 44 ; is set upon having Bishops, 42 ; resigns the Regency, ib. ; accused and committed to prison, 45 ; his character, ib. ; his execution, 49. Morton, William, Earl of, 126. Muirhead, Mr Thomas, 278. Murray, Bishop of, delated, 29. Murray, Sir David, afterwards Lord Scoone. See Scoone, Lord. Murray, Mr John, minister of Leith and afterwards of Dunfermline, warded 197; Bishops urge his confinement in a barba rous part of the country, 207, 209 ; con fined within the parish of FouUs, 299. Murray, Sir Patrick, 83, 88, 99, 106, 129. Murray, Robert, 248. Murray, Lord of TuUibardine, 1 49. Murray, William,, minister at Dysart, 128, 379 ; visits the Ministers imprisoned in Blackness, 454, 506. N Newbattle, Mark, Lord, 149, 545. Nicolson, George, 128. 574 INDEX. Nicolson, Mr James, minister of Meigle, and afterwards Bishop of Dunkeld, 58 ; protests against the permission granted to the Earl of Huntly to return, 67 ; sent as a Commissioner to the King to Falkland, 68, 69 ; changes his views, 88, 360 ; his influence in inducing Minis ters to hold an Extraordinary Assembly at Perth, 89, 102, 112, 136,501; at Court, 167, 172 ; refuses to meet with Ministers of the North to take measures for redressing the grievances of that part of the country, 380 ; joins with the Privy Council in proceeding against the Ministers who kept Aberdeen Assembly, 403 ; is resolved to accept the Bishop rick of Dunkeld, 177 ; chosen Modera tor of the Convention at Linlithgow, 180; his death, 196, 203. Nicolson, Mr Thomas, 128, 133. O Ochiltree, Lord, 263. Octavians, their appointment, 67, the chief of them, 83 ; Papists in their hearts and hostile to Presbytery, 85, 355 ; make a tumult raised in Edinburgh a pretext for overthrowing the liberties of the Church, 355. Office-bearers, Church, four sorts of, war ranted by Scripture, 3. Ogle, Mr David, 126. Oliphant, Mr William, 149, 453, 464, 493. Order of Geneva, The, or The Book of Common Order, 3. Orkney, Earl of, 167, 170. Orkney, [Adam Bothwell] Popish Bishop of, embraces the Reformed Religion, 15; appointed Commissioner of Orkney, 16 ; marries Queen Mary and the Earl of Bothwell, ib. ; delated, ib ; restored again to the Ministry, 17 ; sundry charges brought against, 17, 22. Oswald, Mr Archibald, 205, 233. Overall, Dr John, Dean of St Paul's, 178. Papists, proceedings of the General As sembly at Linlithgow in reference to, 202, 204, 220 ; discussion in Aberdeen Assembly of 1616, concerning articles made against, 242, 244 ; proclamation against, 125, Parliament of 1584, acts dangerous to the Church concluded in, 51 ; Ministers urged to subscribe these acts under pain of loss of stipend, 52 ; the sincerer sort of the Ministers seek their abrogation, 53; Parliament held in June 1609, 215; restores Archbishops and Bishops to their former authority and jurisdiction, 215, 216. Paton, Mr James, inaugurated Bishop of Dunkeld, 28 ; delated and suspended 29 ; charged to demit his Bishoprick, 40. Penman, Mr William, 126. Perth, Articles of, 255 ; some reasoning. upon, 259 ; but no due reasoning allow ed, 261, 262; how put to vote, 262; concluded, 263 ; ratified, aod the ratifi cation proclaimed, 266 ; King's letter to the Bishops commanding them to depose all Ministers who refused to conform, 271 ; proclamation concerning the Arti cles, 281 ; officers of state consult how to stop all opposition to their ratification in Parliament, 283, 284 ; informations of some of the Ministers of the Church to the Estates in reference to their rati fication, 285-289 ; reasons against their ratification, 289-291 ; Admonitions and Protestations against them to be pre sented to the Lords of the Articles, 291- 294 ; methods used to promote their ratification by Parliament, 294, 295 ; bad omen of that Parliament, 295 ; Ministers not allowed to enter it, ib. ; voting for the articles and their ratifi cation, 296, 297 ; dreadful storm of thunder and lightning at their ratifica tion, 297 ; Acts of ParUament pro claimed at the market cross of Edin burgh, 298 ; which are publicly pro tested against, ib. ; Lords of Privy Coun cil and of Session commanded by the King to conform to the Articles, 299 ; others required to conform, ib ; opposi tion of the people of Edinburgh to them, 318, 338. Perth, Assembly at, in 1618; corrupt preparations for, 251 ; indicted, ib. ; its proceedings, 255-266; Ministers urged to conform to the acts of, 267 ; the greater part refuse, ib. Pest prevails, 52, 137, 196, 312. Philip, Dr Henry, Minister of Arbroath, 180, 205, 244, 552. Plague. See Pest. Policy, The, a commission appointed to confer upon, 41 ; reasoning upon the Se cond Book of, ib. ; heads of the Second INDEX. 575' Book of, presented to the Regent, 42 ; copies to be presented to the King and Council, 43 ; favourable answer of the King, ib. ; King's letter to the Assembly concerning, 44 ; the Assembly's answer, 44, 45, 46 ; the Heads of Policy form the Second Book of DiscipUne, 46 ; which condemns the whole system of Episco pacy, 46 ; and is ordained by the As sembly to be inserted in the Register of their acts, 48 ; all ministers required by act of Assembly to subscribe it, 57. Pont, Mr Robert, Minister at Dunkeld, 1 5 ; Moderator of the General Assembly, 17; Commissioner of Murray, 22; a Senator in the College of Justice, 31; de lated, ib. ; Moderator of the General Assembly, 32 ; protests against the acts of Parliament of 1584, 51, 153; the King wishes him to accept of the Bishop rick of Caithness, 55, 69, 74, 359 ; preaches at the opening of the Assembly of Dundee 1597, 93, 101; Moderator of the General Assembly, 147. Pope, letter addressed to the, 110, 125 ; the King's aUeged promise to, 203. Popery suppressed in 1560, 4. Forteous, James, 248. Powder treason, 148. Prebendaries, 24. Presbytery, remarks on the advantages of, 62-64 ; civil establishment of, 348 ; the beginning of the decay of the govern ment and jurisdiction by, 349 ; laws made in prejudice of, 350, 351 ; again established, 351, 353 ; second decay of the Presbyterial jurisdiction, 354 ; en deavours of the Octavians to overthrow it, 355 ; efforts to preserve it, 359. Presbyteries, how not constituted at the commencement of the Reformation, 1 0 ; the Reformers act as nearly on the prin ciple of, as their circumstances admitted, 13 ; a platt to be devised for the consti tution of, 37, 45, 48 ; the Assembly appoint some Presbyteries to be con stituted as patterns, 48 ; the names of all the Presbyteries are given in to the Assembly of 1593, 60; matters to be taken up in, ib. ; parity in, 61 ; the Moderator has only priority of order, ib.; how long the government by Presby teries continued, ib. President, Lord. See Balmerinoch. Preston, Mr John, Collector and President of the Court of Session, 149, 187, 211 ; opposes the trial of the Ministers im prisoned for Aberdeen Assembly, 475. Primrose, Mr Peter, minister of Mauch- line, 223. Priors, 27, 46. Priories annexed to the Crown, 56. Provincial Assemblies. See Synods. Provostries, 24. Psalms of David, metrical version of the, 337. R Rait, Mr David, a member of Aberdeen Assembly, 387 ; constitutes the meeting by prayer, ib. 393 ; not troubled for holding that Assembly, 424. Ramsay, minister of Edinburgh, 248, 250, 253. Ramsay, Mr Tobias, minister of Foulden, 188. Ramsay, Mr WiUiam, one of the Masters of St Salvator's College, St Andrews, 19. Readers, 5, 12 ; persons ignorant and im moral said to be admitted to be, 13 ; found qualified to baptize and solemnize mar riage, 23 ; their office declared not to be an ordinary ecclesiastical office, 39. " Reading Ministers " not allowed by First Book of Discipline, 5, 9. Reformed Religion, establishment of, by Parliament, 4. Reid, Mr John, minister of Logie Buchan, 244. Reid, Mr Robert, minister of Banchory- Trinity, member of Aberdeen Assembly, 133, 387, 393 ; appears before the Council, 423 ; acknowledges the unlaw fulness of Aberdeen Assembly, 424. Rigg, William, Baillie, warded in Caith ness, 280, 281 ; summoned to appear before the Lords of Council, 308 ; or dained to keep his own house, 308, 309 ; deprived of his office and warded in Blackness, 310, 311 ; the King insists on his being fined, 311; suffered to re turn to his own house for the space of forty days, 312. Robertson, Mr David, minister of Rugley [Rutherglen] ; member of Aberdeen Assembly, 133, 387, 393; appears be fore the Council, 423; acknowledges the unlawfulness of Aberdeen Assem bly, 424. Robertson, Mr George, 101. Robertson, James, 123, 248. Robertson, Walter, 128. RoUock, Mr Peter, Bishop of Dunkeld, 163, 217. 576 INDEX. RoUock, Mr Robert, minister of Edinburgh and Principal of the University, 72, 74, 102. Ross, James, minister of Aberdeen, a mem ber of Aberdeen Assembly, 128, 133, 387 ; preaches at the opening of it, 133, 387, 393; appears before the Council, 423 ; acknowledges the unlaw fulness of Aberdeen Assembly, 424. Ross, John, comes to keep Aberdeen As sembly after it is dissolved, 136, 397 ; appears before the Council, 137, 138, 423 ; refuses to acknowledge the unlaw fulness of Aberdeen Assembly, 424 ; imprisoned in the castle of Stirling, 138, 424. Rough, John, minister of Nigg, member of Aberdeen Assembly, 128, 133, 387, 393. Rough, Robert, 249. Row, Mr John, the Reformer, minister at Perth, appointed to assist in drawing up the First Book of Discipline, 4 ; ap pointed to visit Galloway, 17, 33. Row, Mr John, minister of Carnock, con fined to his own parish, 299, 455. Row, Mr William, minister of Forgan- denny, 186. Royal Chapel at Holyroodhouse, intended decoration of, with the statues of the twelve apostles, 246. Russel, Lord, eldest son of the Earl of Bedford, 52. Rutherford, Mr John, ProvoBt of Old College, St Andrews, 26. Rutherford, Mr John, minister of Kilcon- quhar, deposed by the Presbytery of St Andrews, 95 ; his sentence of deposition reduced by the King and the Commis sioners of the General Assembly, 95, 100, 361 ; this approved of by the Ge neral Assembly at Dundee, 364, Ruthven, Raid of, 49 ; those concerned in it forced to withdraw from the coun try, 50 ; the banished Lords return, 53. Ruthven, Robert, Commendator of Dun fermline, 22. Ruthven, William, Lord, Treasurer, 22, Scoone, Lord, Sir David Murray, 149, 152, 170, 185-187, 260, 270, 545. Scot, Mr George, minister of Kirkaldy. Scot, Mr Robert, minister of Glasgow, 244, 248, 280, 316. Scot, Mr William, 12. Scot, Mr William, minister of Kennoway' and afterwards of Cupar, 116; prepares a petition to be sent to the King in fa vour of the imprisoned Ministers, 440- 442, 506; summoned to Court, 165, 169, 552 ; his answers to the King's Questions, 173-175; charged to remain in his own parish, 194; the Bishops opposed to his having liberty to attend the General Assembly, 201, 205, 206, 244 ; his opinion of the titles of Bishops, Abbots, Priors, &c, 315; and of the Act of ParUament 1633, concerning the apparel of churchmen, 340, 341. Scot, Mr WiUiam, a minister in the West, 249. Scrimgeour, Mr John, minister of King horn, cited to compear before the High Commission, 273 ; his compearance and speech before it, 273, 274, 275; his reasons against his sentence, 275-277; conversation between him and Spottis wood, 277 ; his Protestation, ib. ; preaches in Kinghorn notwithstanding the sentence of the High Commission, 278 ; visits the Ministers imprisoned in Blackness, 455. Scrogie, Mr Alexander, a member of Aber deen Assembly, 387 ; appears before the Council, 423 ; acknowledges the unlaw fulness of Aberdeen Assembly, 424. Sharp, David, 278. Sharp, Mr John, minister of Kilmany, a member of Aberdeen Assembly, 133, 134, 387. 392 ; appears before the Council, 137, 407 ; warded in Black ness, ib. ; signs the Declinature, 140. Sharp, Mr Patrick, 112, 167, 180, 205. Shaw, James, of Sauchie, 152, 155. Shaw, Patrick, 105, 248. Simonaical Pactions, an act restraining, 267. Simpson, Adam, 249. Simpson, Mr Alexander, 284. Simpson, Mr Archibald, minister of Dal keith, 247, 248 ; warded in the Castle of Edinburgh, 249 ; comes to keep Aberdeen Assembly after it is dissolved, 396 ; summoned to appear before the Council, but is sent home without being farther troubled, 424 ; attends the trial of the Ministers at Linlithgow, 456. Simpson, Mr Patrick, minister of Stirling, 112, 117; attends the trial of the Ministers at Linlithgow, 456, 462, 553 ; chosen Moderator of the Conference at Falkland, 199, 200,' 201, 202, 205; his letter to the Conference at Falkland, 211. INDEX. 577 Simpson, Mr William, is summoned to compear before the Lords of Council, 309 ; ordained to be imprisoned in the jail of Edinburgh, Ib. ; deprived of the office of deacon, 311 ; promises to com- municato according to Perth Articles, ib. Skene, Sir John, Clerk of Register, 67, 403, 496. Smith, Mr John, minister of Maxton, 188, 248. Sonsie, Luke, 248. Spence, Mr David, 232. Spottiswood, Mr John, appointed to assist in drawing up the First Book of Disci pline, 4 ; Superintendent of Lothian, 6 ; manner of his election to be Superinten dent, 7 ; assists in the admission of Mr John Douglas to be Bishop of St Andrews, 25, 28. Spottiswood, Mr John, 6on of the preced ing, Archbishop of Glasgow. and after wards of St Andrews, 7, 58 ; is active in procuring subscriptions to Black's Declinature, 72, 112, 126; made Bishop of Glasgow, 381 ; his sermon against the established discipline, 158; at Court, 167, 197, 199, 204, 206; memorials penned by him to the King, 207 ; admitted one of the Lords of Ses sion, 217 ; commission given to him to hold two Courts of High Commission, 218; Moderator of Glasgow Assembly of 1610, 223 ;• consecrated Bishop at Lon don, 234 ; translated to the See of St Andrews, 238 ; his power, 239 ; usurps the office of Moderator of Assembly at Aberdeen in 1616, without election, 241 ; inveighs against Andrew Melvill, 252 ; his sermon at the opening of Perth Assembly in 1618, 255 ; places himself in the Moderator's chair with out election, 256 ; his zeal in promoting the Five Articles, 257-262, 269-271; sits in the High Commission, 273-275, 278 ; holds a Diocesan Synod, 281, 298; his treatment of David Dickson before the High Commission, 300-302, 317, 324, 326, 369, 403, 406, 501, 513. Stewart, Colonel, 85. Stewart, Henry, of Craigiehall, chancellor of the jury on the trial of the imprisoned Ministers, 152, 154, 476, 494. Stewart, Sir James, Earl of Arran, 49. Stewart, Walter, Prior of Blantyre, 67. Strachan, Mr Alexander, minister of Creich. a member of Aberdeen Assem- 2 bly, 133 ; appears before the Council, 137, 407 ; warded in Blackness, ib. ¦ signs the Declinature, 140 ; put to the trial of an assize, 148. Straiton, Sir Alexander. See Laureston. Straiton, Mr John, minister of Forres, cited to compear before Bishop Glad stanes, and warded, 235. Strang, Doctor, 263. Struthers, Mr William, minister of Edin burgh, 243-245, 248, 251, 267, 308, 319, 321. Subscription to the Confession of Faith, 55, 243 ; subscription to the Book of PoUcy required of all Ministers, 57, 59. Superintendents, election and admission of, 3 ; the office of, temporary, 5, 6, 47 ; their number, 6 ; difference be tween Superintendents and Bishops, 6- 9,12, 14; limitations of the jurisdiction of, 14, 19 ; acts for curbing the power of, 30, 3 1 ; how long the government by, continued, 32 ; to be appointed by Assemblies, 34 ; the duties of, ib. Supremacy, King's, Act of Parliament con cerning, 163. Swinton, Mark, a Papist, 152. Sydserf, Mr Thomas, Bishop of Brechin, 123, 308, 320, 321. Synods, or Provincial Assemblies, 10; ap pointed by the General Assembly to be held twice in the year, 1 2 ; their power, and matters to be treated of by , 61. Thirds, The, 20 ; provision to the King's house out of, 21. Thomson, Richard, Clerk to the Commis sioners of the General Assembly, 135, 377 ; his death, 203. Transportation of Ministers, 12, 242. Traquair, Laird of, 85. Trent, Council of, 47. Tulchan Bishops, 25. Tumult in Edinburgh, 84, 85 ; made ;>, pretext for the King's altering the go vernment of the Kirk, 86. Vaughan, Bishop of London, 271. Visitors, the office, power, and jurisdiction of, 35, 36 ; Acts of Assembly regarding, 36, 37 ; offioe of Visitor declared to be a corruption by the General Assembly, O 578 INDEX. 37 ; how long this office continued, ib ; the Annual election of Visitors to cease where Presbyteries were sufficiently constituted, 58 ; order of the procedure of, 120. Vote in Parliament, not allowed to Minis ters by the First Book of Discipline, 8, 9 ; Bishops appointed to have Vote in Parliament, 20 ; which ought not to belong to Ministers, 97, 98 ; determi nation of the King that they should have Vote, 102; Act allowing it passed in Parliament, 362; concluded in General Assembly of Dundee, 103,364; Cautions with respect to Ministers having Vote, 107-113, 366, 369; pretence for the act, 114; opposition to it, 114, 130, 158; number of Ministers having vote, 163, 364, Commissioners Voters in Parlia ment become more insolent, 216. cellor after the meeting of Aberdeen Assembly, 401, 402, 512, 541, 542; his freedom in the pulpit with his Majesty, 405 ; put to the trial of an Assise, 148 ; his speech at the bar, 153, 485-488 ; Welsh and Forbe9 considered most intractable, 418, 426, 496; Welsh is warded in the Castle of Edinburgh, 545. Whiteford, Walter, minister of Moffat, 248, 278. Whitgift, Doctor, 4. Whitlaw, Dame Margaret, 124. Wigton, Earl of, 170. Wilkie, Robert, 105, 112, 123. Willock, Mr John, Superintendent for Glasgow, 4, 6. Winram, Mr John, Superintendent for Fife, 4, 6, 12, 13, 22 ; admits Mr John Douglas to be Bishop of St Andrews, 25, 28. Wishart, John, 135. W Wachan. See Vaughan. Wallace, Daniel, 126. Wallace, Michael, 248. Wallace, Mr Robert, Minister of St An drews, 95, 165, 194, 361, 364, 552. Watson, Mr William, 116, 120; summoned to Court, 165, 194, 552. Weemes, John, 205, 248. Weemes, William, 248. Welsh, Mr John, conies to keep Aberdeen Assembly after it is dissolved, 136, 396; summoned to compear before the Coun cil, 137, 404; imprisoned in Blackness, 137, 406 ; signs the Declinature, 140; his interview with the Lord Chan- Young, Doctor John, Dean of Winches ter, 256, 257. Young, Mr John, comes to keep Aber deen Assembly after it is dissolved, 136, 396; not troubled on that account, 424. Youngson, Mr Robert, Minister of Clatt, a member of Aberdeen Assembly, 133, 387, 393; appears before the Council, 423, 133 ; acknowledges the unlawful ness of Aberdeen Assembly, 136, 424 ; appears before the Council and professes his sorrow for that acknowledgment, 138, 431, 432; is warded in Stirling, 434. FINIS. TAM KM WALK UK, nilNTF.K, (J. JAMTSS COUKT, EDINBURGH,