YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY '""-^¦ft^ ^Etroi^-pn^a Co CBi<^ ^^ C^^, THE HISTORY OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN, AND THE OVEHTHROW OE SLAVERY. By ISAAC N. ARNOLD, LATE MBMBEB OF CONOEESS PEOM II.I/INOIS. CHICAGO: OLABKE & CO., PUBLISHERS. 1866. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1866, By CLARKE & CO., In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. PEINIED AND BOOHD BT OHiCAao TYPE foundry: THE WESTEEN Book Mannfaotnimg Comp'y J. CONAHAN, OHIGAOO. BTEMOIYPIR. DEDICATION. TO THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATORS COMPOSINO THE IHIRTY-SEVENTH AND THIRTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS U>fITED STATES. Gentlemen : To you, in commemoration of many friendships which will be ever cherished, of an association which will ever be held in grateful recollection, and as an expression of my high appreciation of the patriotism, constancy, love of liberty, wisdom, and statesmanship, which, by your legislation and influence, contributed so largely to redeem and save the Eepublic, L desire respectfully to dedicate this work. It was your privilege to occupy a responsible position at the most critical period of our history. Under the lead of the Great Martyr whose work, with yours, I have on these pages attempted to record, you have rendered great service to our country. Those vast armies, whose victorious cam paigns extended over half a continent; that great navy, which has made the United States " Mistress " at least of the Western " Seas ;" that system of finance which has carried us, unaided by foreign loans, through the late stupendous war, were all created and sustained by youi IV DEDICATION. But more than all, above all, that ever treasonable, cruel and barbar ous institution of slavery, has been " overthrown '' by the President, aided and seconded by you. It was for you to abolish forever, slavery at the National Capital; to prohibit it throughout all the Territories; to repeal the Fugitive Slave Laws; to put the sword into the hand of the slave, that he might achieve liberty for himself, his family, and his race ; and it was for you to crown all by the Constitutional amendment, abol ishing and prohibiting slavery throughout the Republic. You stood close and ever faithful to our great National Leader, during his event ful administration; and by your aid he was enabled to maintain the integrity of the Nation; to establish National unity based on universal liberty. Although many of you did not at first fully understand or appreciate the great, pure, honest, hng-Tieaded Statesman from the West, yet before he was so mysteriously removed, you had learned to love, honor, and respect him. His deeds and yours I have, attempted on these pages to record. How imperfect the execution of the work, none can more fully appreciate than the author. I have quoted from your debates far less than I TOuld have done, had space permitted. Of many of those from whose speeches my limits did not permit me to quote, I can only say, that, if what is given shall direct attention to those rich mines of eloquence and statesmanship to be found in those volumes of the Gongressional Globe, which contain the complete records of your speeches and transactions, they who shall study those volumes will be richly compensated. In looking over your records, I recall the names of many who left the forum for the camp and battle-field. Among others there were Logan, Blair, McClemand, Fouke, Marston, Van Wyok, Divin, McKean, Curtis, Vandever, Dunn, and Baker, the martyred Senator. And in running over the old roll-call of the Senate, I miss the names of the jovial, honest, and true Preston King; of those crave learned, and able Senators from Vermont, Jacob CoUamer and Solomon Foote ; and of the genial Kinsley S. Bingham, of Michigan, and Governor Hicks, the Senator from Maryland, all of whom now sleep in death. Of the members of the .House who have been thus removed there were Bailey, of Massachusetts, Gurley, of Ohio, Hanchot, of Wisconsin DEDICATION. V Noell, of Missouri; and to these must be added the names of Owen Lovejoy, the pioneer Abolitionist of Illinois, and the venerable John hickory poles and hickory brooms your never ending emblems ; Mr. Polk, himself, was " Young Hickory," " Littie Hickory," or something so ; and even now your campaign paper here is proclaiming that Cass and Butler are of the true " Hickory Stripe." No, sir ; you dare not give it up. Like a horde of hungry ticks, you have stuck to the taU of the Hermitage lion to the end of his life, and you are still sticking to it, and drawing a loathsome sustenance from it after he is dead. A feUow once advertised that he had made a discovery, by which he could make a new man out of an old one, and have enough stuff left to make a little yellow (Jog. Just such a discovery has General Jackson's popularity been to you. You not only twice made President of hina out of it, "out you have had enough of the stuff left to make Presidents of several comparatively sraall men since ; and it is your chief reliance now to make still another. Mr. Speaker, The gentleman says we have deserted our principles, and turned Henry Clay out, like an old horse, to rot. Old horses and military coat-tails, or tails of any sort, are not flgures of speech such as I would be the flrst to introduce into discussion here ; but as the gentleman from Georgia has thought flt to introduce them, he and you are welcome to all you have made, or can make, by them. If you have any more old horses, trot them out ; any more tails, just cock them, and come atus. I repeat, I would not introduce this mode of discussion here ; but I wish gentle men on the other side to understand, that the use of degrading flgures is a game at which they may not flnd themselves able to take all the winnings. " TVe giveitup." Aye, you " give it up," and well you may, but from a very different reason from that which you would have us understand. The poiut — the power to hurt — of all figures, consists in the truthfulness of their application ; and understanding this, you may well give it up. They are weapons which hit you, but miss us. But, in nay hurry, I was very near closing on the subject of military coat-tails, before I was done with it. There is one entire article of the sort I have not dis cussed yet; I mean the military tail yon democrats are now engaged in dovetailing on to the great Michigander. Yes, sir, all his biographers, (and they are legion,) have him in hand, tying, tying him to a military tail, like so many mischievous boys tying a dog to a bladder of beans. True, the material they have is very lim ited ; but they drive at it, might and main. He mvaded Canada without resistance and he ow^vaded it without pursuit. As he did both under orders, I suppose there was, to him, neither credit in them ; but they are made to constitute a large part of the tail. He was volunteer aid to General Harrison on the day of the battle of the Thames ; and, as you said in 1840, Harrison was picking whortleberries, two miles off, while the battle was fought, I suppose it is a just conclusion, with you, to say Cass was aiding Harrison to pick whortleberries. This is about all, except the mooted question of the broken sword. Some authors say he broke it; some say he threw it away ; and some others, who ought to know, say nothing about it. Perhaps It would be a fair historical compromise to say, if he did not break it, he did not do anything else jvitli it. By the way, Mr. Speaker; did you know I am a military hero 7 Yes, sir, in the days of the Black Hawk war, I fought, bled, and came away. Speaking of General Cass' career, reminds me of my own. I was not at Stillmau's defeat, but I was about as near it, as Cass was to Hull's surrender; and, like him, I saw the placo veiT soon afterwards. It is quite certain I did not break my sword, for I had none to break; but I bent my musket pretty badly on one occasion. If Cass broke his sword, the idea is, he broke it in desperation ; I bent my musket by accident. If General Cass went in advance of me in picking whortleberries, I guess I surpassed him in charges upon the wild onions. If he saw any live flghting Indians, it was more than I did, but I had a good many bloody struggles with the musquitoes ; and although I neverfalnted from loss of blood, I can truly say I was often very hungry. 84 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLA-VERY. Mr. Speaker, if I should ever conclude to doff whatever our democratic friends may suppose there is of black-cockade federalism about me, and, thereupon, they shall take me up as their candidate for the Presidehcy, 1 protest they shall not make fun of me, as they have of General Cass, by atteniptlng to write me into a military hero. Mr. Speaker, let our democratic friends be comforted with the assurance, that we are content with our position, content with our company, and content -witli our candidate; and that, although they, in their generous sympathy, think we ought to be miserable, we really are not, and now they may dismiss the great anxiety they have on our account. They are kind enough to remind us that we have some dissensions In onr ranks ; I knew we had dissenters, but I did not know, they were trying to get onr candi date away from us. Have the democrats no dissenters? Is it all union and har mony in your ranks 7 No bickerjng ? No divisions 7 If there be doubt as to which of our divisions will get our candidate, is there no doubt as to which ofyour candi dates will get your party7 I have heard some things from New York; and If they are true, we might weU say of your party there, as a drunken fellow once said when he heard the reading of an indictment for hog-stealing. The clerk read on till he got to, and through the words " did steal, take, and carry away, ten boars, ten sows, tenshoats, and ten pigs," at which he exclaimed— "Well, by goUy, that is the most equally divided gang of hogs I ever did hear of." If there is any gang of hogs more equally divided than the democrats of New York are about this time, I have not heard of It. On the adjournment of Congress, Mr, Lincoln took a trip into New England, and spoke often and earnestly in favor of General Taylor's election. He also stumped Illinois and , other parts of the West, with great effect during this Presi dential canvass. General Taylor's election inspired hopes that the administration would be, at least, fair and just towa,rds the North on the slavery question. At the second session of the Thirty-first Congress, the most important and significant act of Mr. Lincoln, was the introduction into the House, of a bill to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia. The bill provided that no per son from without the district should be held to slavery within it, and no person thereafter, born within the district, should be held to slavery. It provided that officers of the govern ment, being citizens of slave states, coming into the district on public business, might bring their slaves temporarily into the district, and hold them while necessarily engaged in pub lic business. It provided for the emancipation of all slaves legally held within the district, at the will ofthe masters, and that full compensation should be made by the government and that the act should be subjected to the approval of the people of the district. BILL TO ABOLISH SLAVERY . 85 The provisions of this bill have been quoted as evidence that Mr. Lincoln was not a thoroughly anti-slavery man. So far from proving this, it establishes the fact that he was such, and it proves also, that he was a practical statesman, and not a visionary theorist. He believed slavery was unjust to the slave, and impolitic for the nation, and he meant to do all in his power to get rid of it. He prepared his bill with reference to the condition of public sentiment, at that time, and what was possible to be accomplished. The bill represents what he hoped could, by the action of Congress, become a law, rather than his own abstract views of justice and right. The result showed that even this bill would not be tolerated by the slaveholders. Their opposition was so decided and unanimous, that the bill could not even be brought to a vote. On the question whether slaves used and lost by the offi cers of the government while engaged in the Seminole war, should be paid for, as property, which was raised in the cele- bratedPachecocase, Mr. Lincoln voted, "no!" He would not pay for them ; thus refusing to recognize property in slaves, as against the right of the government to the services of all citizens, or persons black or white, in time of war. Mr. Gott, of New York, introduced a resolution instruct ing the Committee on the District of Columbia, to report a bill abolishing the slave trade. Mr. Lincoln moved an amendment, instru --ting the Committee to report a bill to abolish, not the slave trade, but slavery. Mr. Lincoln's Congressional term ended March 4th, 1849; he declined a reelection, and was succeeded by the eloquent E. D. Baker. He was a candidate for the appointment of Commissioner ofthe General Land Office, from President Taylor; for which place, he was recommended by the whig State Central Com mittee of Illinois. It was given to Justin Butterfield, a distinguished lawyer of Chicago. ^Mr. Lincoln was tendered the position of Secretary, and then of Governor of Oregon ; but fortunately for him, and the country, providentially, I ought to say, he declined. There was work for him this side of the Rocky Mountains. In 1849-50, he was voted for by his party in the Illinois 86 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Legislature, for the Senate ; but the democrats had a large majority. The vote was a recognition of his position as the leader of his party. From Mr. Lincoln's retirement from Congress, in 1849, until the passage of the Kansas and Nebraska bill, in 1854, he was engaged in the laborious and succesful practice of his profession. He rode the circuit, attended the terms of the Supreme Court, and United States District and Circuit Courts, and held a leading position at the bar. Mr. Lincoln was the father of four children, Robert, Ed ward who died in infancy ; William, the beautiful and most promising boy, who died at Washington, during his Presi dency, and Thomas. The oldest and youngest, are living. Robert, a promising young man, who graduated with dis tinction at Harvard, Massachusetts, and who served for. a short time, on the staff' of General Grant. Thomas, the youngest, is receiving his education at the excellent public schools in Chicago. The tenderness, affection, and indul gence of Mr. Lincoln for his family, were conspicuous, even while burdened with the cares of the Presidency. He was an indulgent and most affectionate father. The loss of his son Willie, seemed to make his affection for the youngest a passion. In the midst of the cares and annoyances of the Presidency, he was in the daily habit of reading to this child, a chapter in the Bible. He governed his children by affec tion. His severest censure was an affectionate reproach. After the death of William, he seemed to cling, if possible, still more closely to the others, and it was no unusual thing, for the visitor at the White House, on the gravest subject, to find the President, with his young boy, " Taddy," as he was called, in his arms. Mr. Lincoln was a good, natural mechanic, and when he again entered public life, was rapidly acquiring distinction as a patent lawyer. In the great case of McCormick against Manny, involving the question of infringement of the patent of McCormick's celebrated reaper, he was engaged for Manny. It is a curious fact, that in this case, he was opposed, among others, by two members of his cabinet, Messrs. Seward and LINCOLN AGAIN AT THE BAR. 87 Stanton, the latter then practicing law at Pittsburgh, and Washington, with great distinction. Mr. Lincoln invented, and patented, an apparatus for lifting steamers over shoals and bars, in the Western rivers. The curious, may find the model, made by himself, among the curiosities of the Patent Office, at the Capital. His practical skill, as a mechanic, his wonderful power of statement and illustration, his ability to make the most abstruse point clear to the common mind, made him almost unequalled as a patent lawyer. He had, at this period of his life, a very large, and it might have been, a very lucrative practice, but his fees were, as his brethren of the law called them, ridiculously small. He lived simply and respectably, with no expensive tastes or habits, his wants being few and simple. The -only instance known of his tak ing a fee, regarded as large, was the charge of five thousand dollars, to the Illinois Central Railroad, for services, in a very important case in the Supreme Court. This rich corporation, ¦with a road and branches, running more than seven hundred miles in the State of Illinois, the case involving questions of great difficulty, and of vast pecuniary importance to the corporation, his friends insisted that he should charge a liberal fee for the very important and valuable services he rendered. He never, knowingly, accepted a fee to support fraud, injustice, or wrong; but to the poor, the oppressed, the weak, his services were ever ready, with or without a fee. The son of a poor widow, who had, in his early struggles, befriended Lincoln and rendered him many kind offices, was indicted for murder; Lincoln, the moment he heard of it, wrote her a letter volunteering to defend her son. It was a case where public prejudice was strong against the accused, and the principal witness swore, that he saw, by the bright light of the moon, the prisoner give the death-blow. Mr. Lincoln showed, by reference to the almanac, that there was no moon on the night in question. The case brought out all his power, as an advocate. His appeal and arguments were irre sistible, and he carried the jury and the crowd with him. When the jury returned a verdict of " noi guilty," the aged mother fainted in the arms of her son. Such was Lincoln's grateful return to the poor woman, who had aided him in 88 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. his days of struggle with poverty. In his arguments at the bar, Mr. Lincoln's style was generally plain and unimpas sloned, and his professional bearing was so high and honora ble, that no man ever questioned his truthfulness, or his honor. No one, who ever watched him for half an hour, in a hard contested case, would doubt his ability. He had a clear insight into the human heart; knew jury, witnesses, parties, attorneys, and how best to address and manage all. His statement of his case was an argument of itself; his illustrations, often quaint and homely, yet always clear and presented with sincerity and earnestness of manner, gener ally carried conviction. He never misstated evidence, or law, but met the case squarely and fairly. Such was Mr. Lincoln at the bar, a fair, honest, able lawyer, on the right side, always successful — avoiding, carefully, the wrong side, and when he found himself upon it, either throwing up his case, or making an effort so weak, that the jury, generally said, " Lincoln is on the wrong side; he don't try." The last case which Mr. Lincoln ever tried, was the case of Jones V. Johnson, tried in the United States Circuit Court at Chicago, in the Spring of 1860, before the Hon. Thomas Drummond, District Judge. The case involved the title to land of great value, which had been formed by accretion, on the shore of Lake Michigan, by the gradual action of the lake. It led to an investigation of ancient land marks and boundaries, old Government surveys, and maps; the loca^ tion of the lake shore when the town of Chicago was first platted into town lots, etc. It involved the recollections of the old settlers, and was a case peculiarly fitted for Mr. Lin coln's powers. The case was tried by Mr. Lincoln, and Messrs. Wilson & Fuller, and others, for the plaintiff, Jones, and by Judge B. S. Morris, and the author,for the defendant Mr. Lincoln obtained a verdict in favor of his client al though in the previous trials, the result had been the other way. CHAPTEE lY. LINCOLN AND SLAVERY FROM 1854 TO 1858. Lincoln and Douglas Debate at Springpield, 1855 — At Peo ria — Election op Trumbull to the Senate — Keorqaniza- TiON OP Parties on the Slavery Issue — The Kepublican Party — Presidential Election of 1856 — Margaret G-arneb — Brooks' Assault on Sumner — Lincoln's Hatred op Slav ery — Buchanan — Kansas — Lecompton — Douglas — The I- Dred Scott Case — Slavery Dominant, and Its Eppects Upon the Republic. TN 1854, events occurred, which brought into public action -L all the power and energy of Mr. Lincoln. The repeal ofthe Missouri Compromise, the struggle for, and outrages in Kan sas, brought him again prominently before the people of Illi nois, and from this time, he devoted himself to the conflict between freedom and slavery, until he was elevated to the Presidency. The conviction settled upon his mind, that there could be no peace on the slavery question, until freedom or slavery should triumph. Wben Senator Douglas returned to Illinois, after the pas sage of the Kansas-Nebraska bill, he was met by a storm of indignation, which would have overwhelmed a man of less power and -will. Like a bold and couragous man, confident of his power over the people, he met the storm, and sought to overcome it. At his first attempt to address the people at Chicago, he was refused a hearing, but he would be, and was heard. Early in October, the State fair was held at Spring- fi!eld, and his personal and political friends from all parts of the State, made it a point to be there, as it was known Doug las would be present and attempt to vindicate his action. When it was known that Douglas was to speak, Lincoln was 89 90 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. called upon by those who disapproved of the course of the Senator, to reply. Douglas spoke to a vast crowd of people, with his usual great ability. His long experience in debatCj his confidence in himself, made him somewhat arrogant and overbearing. Lincoln listened to his speech, and at the close, it was announced, that he would, on the following day, reply. Douglas was present at this reply, which occupied more than three hours'; during all this long period, Lincoln held his vast audience in close attention. No report of this speech has been made, but it was undoubtedly one of the greatest efforts of his life. A by-stander, describing the speaker and the speech, says. " His whole heart was in the subject. He quivered with feeling and emotion. The house was as still as death." The effect of the speech was most magnetic and powerful ; cheer upon cheer interrupted him. Women waved their handkerchiefs, men sprung from their seats and waved their hats, in uncontrollable enthusiasm. As soon as Lincoln concluded, Douglas sprung to the stand and said he had been abused, "though in a perfectly courte ous manner." He spoke until the hour for supper, but with out his usual success. He said he would continue his re marks in the evening, but he did not. He was evidently, unprepared for the tremendous effort of Lincoln, and could not immediately, recover from it. Their next place of meeting was at Peoria; Mr. Lincoln fol lowed Douglas to that place, and challenged the discussion. On this occasion, as at Springfield, Lincoln replied to Doug las, in a speech of some three hours length, and carried the audience, almost unanimously with him. On these two occa sions, more perhaps than any other in his life, was Douglas disconcerted by the vigor and power of the reply to him. A consciousness of being in the wrong may have contributed to this result. It was perfectly clear, that Lincoln spoke from the most deep and earnest conviction of right, and his man ner indicated this. Mr. Lincoln desired to continue the dis cussion, with the author of the Kansas-Nebraska bill, in other parts of the State, but Douglas declined. General Shields, who was the colleague of Douglas in the Senate, whose term was about to expire, had voted, under ELECTION OF TRUMBULL TO THE SENATE. 91 the influence of Douglas, for the Kansas-Nebraska bill. He was a candidate for reele^ion. Mr. Lincoln having been the leader ofthe whig party, now the leader of all who opposed the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, and the Kansas out rages, was brought prominently forward for the place. The free soil democrats,whigs, and liberty party men, were united and carried a majority of the Legislature. Lincoln would have been elected Senator, as he was the choice of a large majority of the anti-Nebraska members, so elected; but among the Senators, who had been elected as democrats, and who held over, but who would vote for an anti-Nebraska democrat, for the Senate, were N. B. Judd, B. C. Cook, Pal mer, (now Major General Palmer,) and Parks. These gentle men, while appreciating Mr. Lincoln's ability, and his great services, felt that they could not vote for a whig, and brought forward Lyman Trumbull, as a candidate. On ascertaining these facts, seeing danger, that unless prevented by the imme diate concentration ofthe anti-Nebraska members. Governor Matteson, a democrat would be elected, Mr. Lincoln, with the generous magnanimity and unselfish devotion to princi ple which ever characterized him, withdrew his name as a candidate; and by earnest, personal appeals, induced his friends to vote solid for Judge Trumbull, and thus secured his election. Meanwhile the Thirty-fourth Congress had been elected and convened in December, 1855. The old whig party had been dissolved, and out of it had sprung two parties, calling themselves the American, and the republican parties. At this Congress, neither party having a majority, a long struggle ensued for the election of Speaker, which after sixty days' ballotting, resulted in the election of N. P. Banks, .of Massachusetts, over ex-Governor Aiken, of South Carolina. "The slavery question absorbed public attention, and political contests before the people, centered more and more upon that question, as the Presidential election of 1856 approached. The friends of freedom, elevated by the consciousness of a great cause, animated by the advocacy of great principles, and a generous love of hberty, conscious of the moral sub limity of their position, grew more and more confident of success. The slavery question, had shattered and broken up 92 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the old party organizations. From the fragments of former parties, there existed the material, which if it could be united, and brought together, would constitute a powerful and successful party. There had been in the great democratic organization, an earnest and powerful element opposed to slavery; but as that party had passed more and more into the control of the slave holders, this element had been driven out. The old whig party had been broken up ; the party calling itself American, was not sufficiently broad, national, and catholic to suit the American people. The time had come, it was believed by many, for the organization of a new party, which should embody the vitality, vigor, and the genuine democratic prin ciples ofthe ancient democracy; a party which earnestly and heartily believed in the Declaration of Independence; a party that should combine the best elements of the old parties, and all the earnest anti-slavery men of the country. This new organization needed a leader, and found one, unconciously to itself, and to him, in Abraham Lincoln. He was selected by the instincts of the masses of the people. In principle, in character, he was, of all others, the representative man of this new organization. The aggressions of the slaveholders, and their outrages in Kansas, had intensified the feeling of hostility to slavery, and in that hostility, was to be found a common bond of union. Hitherto the democratic party, under the attractive name of democracy, had secured the vote of the foreign born citi zens of the republic. But a large and intelligent class, in cluding the Swedes and Norwegians, and a very numerous body of Germans, and others, when they saw an organiza tion distinctly hostile to slavery, which, in all its forms they abhored, placing itself upon the broad principle of liberty, felt that their true position was in the ranks of this new party. If this powerful foreign element could be detached from the democracy, and join the new party now crystalizing it would contribute very largely towards its early success. But there were strong prejudices to be overcome between these foreign born citizens and that portion of the new party who had been called Americans. THT REPUBLICAN PARTY. 93 The new party was organized in the Northwest, and thus the first cordial union between the Americans, and the foreign born citizens, was established upon the basis of hostility to, and the restriction of, slavery. The leaders of this new party called a convention at Pittsburgh, on the 22d of Febru-, ary, 1856. This convention laid down a platform of broad, comprehensive principles, and inaugurated the republican party. F. P. Blair, Sen., was a leading member of this convention. A convention of the people of Illinois was called at Bloom- ington, in May, 1856, to appoint delegates to the National convention which was to meet at Philadelphia in June, to nominate candidates for President and Vice President. The free-soil democrats, anti-Nebraska democrats, whigs, Ameri cans, and liberty men of Illinois, and of all nationalities, were brought together at this convention, and mainly through the influence of Mr. Lincoln, united on the broad platform of the Declaration of Independence, and hostility to the ex tension of slavery. Great difficulty was found in laying down a satisfactory platform of principles; finally, after much controversy and discussion, -with no satisfactory result, Mr. Lincoln, who was present, was sent for by the committee on resolutions,and he solved the difficulty, by suggesting that all could unite on the principles embodied in the Declaration of Indepen dence and hostility to the extension of slavery. This sug gestion was immediately accepted. " Let us," said he, " in building our new party, plant ourselves on the rock of the Declaration of Independence," and " the gates of hell, shall not be able to prevail against us." The convention, there upon resolved, " That all men are endowed with the inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and that the ob ject of government is to secure these rights to all persons within its jurisdiction;" this, and hostility to slavery, and a determination to resist its further extension, was the sub stance of the platform adopted. Thus was organized the party, that revolutionized the democratic State of Ilhnois, 94 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. against the powerful influence of Douglas, and ultimately elected Mr. Lincoln to the Presidency. The representatives of this new party from all parts of the free States, and some of the slave States, met at Phila delphia, in June, 1856. The great difficulty in regard to union was again successfully encountered, and overcome, mainly through the influence of Mr. Lincoln, and his friends from the Northwest. The platform was substantially the same as that on which the friends of Mr. Lincoln had de termined to fight the battle in Illinois. The convention nominated John C. Frement for President, and William L. Dayton, for Vice President. It was at this convention, that Mr. Lincoln, as the leading statesman of the broad, national Northwest began to be appreciated, and in the informal ballot for Vice President, he received one hundred and ten votes. The democratic party met at Cincinnati, on the 2d of June, and on the first ballot for President, the vote was for James Buchanan, 135, Franklin Pierce, 122, S. A. Douglas, 33. On the sixteenth ballot, the vote stood, Buchanan, 168, Douglas, 121. Buchanan was afterwards nominated, Douglas being considered unavailable, because of his direct connection with the repeal of the Missouri compromise, and Pierce, because of the outrages committed upon the free State setlers in Kansas, under his administration. John C. Breckenridge was nominated for Vice President. The convention, although it could not nominate Douglas, yet " adopted the principles contained in the organic laws, estab lishing the Territories of Kansas and Nebraska. It also endorsed the compromise measures of 1850. By the course of the Southern whigs, in voting for the re peal of the Missouri compromise, and the subsequent support by its leaders, of the compromise measures of 1850, that venerable party was broken up, a large portion of its young and active men joined the free-soil democrats and liberty men, in organizing and strengthening the republican party. A portion of its aged and very respectable members, some times called " Silver Greys," from their venerable appearance, made up, what was called an American party, and these nominated Millard Fillmore for President, and AndreW J. ELECTION OF EIGHTEEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY-SIX. 95 Donellson, for Vice President. When the convention nomin ating these gentlemen, laid upon the table, a resolution, de claring, " That the convention should nominate no man for President and Vice President, who was not in favor of inter dicting the introduction of slavery into territory North of 36° 30", by Congressional a'ction;" about fifty delegates withdrew from the convention, and gave their influence for Fremont and Dayton. The republican convention, nominating Fremont and Day ton, placed itself distinctly and squarely on the great principle of American freedom so emphatically asserted in the Declar ation of Independence, and declared, " That with our repub lican Fathers, we believe it to be a self-evident truth, that all men are endowed with the inalienable rights of life, lib erty, and the pursuit of happiness," and that it was the ob ject of the Federal Government to secure these rights to all persons, -within its exclusive jurisdiction, and the convention denied the right of Congress, a territorial Iicgislature, or any individual, or association of individuals, to give legal exist ence to slavery in any territory of the United States, and de clared that it was the right and duty of Congress to prohibit in the territories, these twin relics of barbarism, poligamy, and slavery." Then followed one of the most animated, and closely con tested political campaigns known in the history of the repub lie. Up to the time of the October State elections, the suc cess of the republican party seemed very probable. The democratic party, however, succeeded in carrying, by small majorities, Pennsylvania, and Indiana, and this virtually, settled the contest. Buchanan received 172 electoral votes, Fremont, 114; and Fillmore, the vote of the State of Mary land. The republican vote was largely increased, by the out rages upon Northern feeling, in the offensive and inhuman enforcement of the fugitive slave law. Two incidents occurred, during the year, and before the Presidential election, calculated to inflame the feelings of he free States, and strikingly illustrative of the character of slavery and the barbarism produced by it. 96 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. One morning, in January, 1856, two families of slaves escaped from Kentucky, and flying across the Ohio river, on the ice, they found refuge in the house of a poor negro. They were followed, traced, overtaken, and breaking open the door, a scene burst upon .the eyes of the pursuers, which exhibits slavery as it was, before the war. In one corner ofthe room, lay a beautiful child, nearly white, bleed ing to death, with its throat cut. In an adjoining room, was the mother of the bleeding child, Margaret Garner, with two other wounded children, with the bloody knife in her hand, seeking to take their lives, desiring to kill all her children rather than they should be taken back to slavery. They were all arrested, and the living taken back to Ken tucky — sent South, and all trace of them lost in that hell of slavery existing in the Gulf States. This mother, who thus sought liberty for her children in death, was a beautiful mu latto, twenty-three years of age, of good character ; she said she had determined tc kill all her children, and then herself, rather than go back to slavery. The other incident, to which allusion has been made, was the attack upon Charles Sumner, Senator from Massachu setts, by Preston Brooks, a member of Congress from South Carolina. Mr. Sumner had made an eloquent speech, onthe Kansas question, exhibiting the barbarism of slavery, and had spoken, with some severity of Butler, of South Carolina, a relative of Brooks. Mr. Brooks, with Keitt, and other abettors, stole into the Senate Chamber, approached Sumner from behind, whUe seated, writing at his desk, knocked him to the floor, and continued to beat him, while insensible until his rage was thoroughly satisfied. The House of Representatives censured, did not expel Brooks. He resigned and was reelected without opposition. His constituents lauded the " chivalric act!" Sumner's real assassin was slavery ! He has lived to see that assassin after striking at the life of the Nation, and at last, thoroughly arousing it — crushed beneath that Nation's manhood and power. There were, during this canvass, many threats, by leading men in the slave States, that in case Fremont should be ll:;coln'£ hostility to slavery increases. 97 elected, the" slave States would secede from the Union. Little consideration, or attention was given to these threats ; they were regarded as idle gasconade, only meant to influence voters. The struggle between freedom and slavery, still went on. The slaveholders, elated with their triumph in the election of Buchanan, were now confident of success. The friends of free dom, so far from being discouraged by Fremont's defeat, became conscious of their power, and nerved themselves for still grater efforts. The contest of 1856 being over, they did notdisband their forces and lay down their arms, but prepared for success in 1860. Old party issues and parties disappeared, and slavery extension became the vital issue. Very few, however, if any, doubted that the contest would be settled by peaceful agencies, and that the decision of the ballot box would be acquiesced in, or if not, would be appealed for new trial to the next election, as was ever the American custom. Mr. Lincoln's opposition to slavery, became more and more intense -with time, and the development of its cruelties. Writing to a friend in 1855, he said, " I hate to see the poor creatures hunted down, caught, and carried back to their stripes and unrequited toil." Seeing, in a steamboat, going down the Ohio, a dozen slaves shackled together with irons, he said, " That sight was a continual torment to me, and I see something like it every time I travel the Ohio, or any other slave border." It was in the campaign of 1856, that no longer embarrassed by party, but standing on the platform of freedom, with which his whole soul sympathised, he exclaimed, with pro phetic enthusiasm, "We will, hereafter, speak for freedom, and against slavery, as long as the Constitution guarantees free speech; until everywhere, on this wide land, the sun shall shine, and the rain shall fall, and the wind shall blow upon no man who goes forth to unrequited toil." Ah ! how little did Lincoln think, when on the prairies of Illinois, he uttered that noble sentiment, that in less than eight years, his voice should utter the potential word of 7 98 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW bP SLAVERY. " emancipation," from the date of which, thereafter, " no man should go forth to unrequited toil." In March, 1857, Mr. Buchanan was inaugurated and organ ized his cabinet ; Lewis Cass was made Secretary of State, Howell Cobb, of Georgia, Secretary of the Treasury ; John B. Floyd, of Virginia, "Secretary of War ; Isaac Toucey, of Connecticut, Secretary ofthe Navy; Jacob Thompson, of Mississippi, Secretary of the Interior ; Aaron V. Brown, of Tennessee, Postmaster General; Jeremiah S. Black, of Pennsylvania, Attorney General. ^ Tbe contest for the possession of Kansas, between ffeedom and slavery, still went on. The free-State men, after seeing Kansas repeatedly invaded by armed men from Missouri, the polls taken possession of, a legislature elected by non-resid ents, and the acts of such a Legislature recognized by the Federal officials, refused to participate in these mock elec tions, and calling a convention of the actual settlers, the people elected delegates, which met at Topeka, adopted a free-State Constitution, submitted it to the people, aud it was almost unanimously adopted. They then proceeded to elect officers under it. This brought the contending parties into direct collision, and civil war menaced Kansas. Congress, in the winter of 1856, had appointed an investigating Committee consisting of William A. Howard, of Michigan, John Sher man, of Ohio, and M. Oliver, of Missouri, which, after full in vestigation, reported, that every election held under the auspices of the United States officials, had been controlled, not by actual settlers, but by residents of Missouri, and that every officer, in the territory, owed his election to non-residents. The people's officers, elected under the Topeka Constitu tion, had been arrested and the Legislature dispersed under orders of the President, by United States regular troops. In January, 1858, a body, calling itself the Legislature of Kan sas, elected by fraud, pretended to submit to a vote of the people, a Constitution, called from the place where the Legis lature had met, the Lecompton Constitution. The law by which this was submitted to a vote, contained a provision that all votes should be "for the Constitution wi^A slavery; the lecompton CONSTITUTION. 99 or for the Constitution without slavery;" and yet the Consti tution itself recognized slavery, and contained a provision restricting the Legislature from interfering with slavery then in the territory, before 1864! The people, by a vote of 10,226, against, to less than 200, for, this Constitution, expressed their opinion of the trick, and yet Mr. Buchanan had the shameless effrontery to urge upon Congress, the admission of Kansas under this Lecomp ton swindle ! It was by such disgraceful means that the states men, so called, of the slave States, sought to force slavery upon Kansas. The repeal of the Missouri Compromise was fatal to the supremacy of the slave power, and the attempt to force slav ery upon Kansas, and surreptitiously to introduce her into the' Union as a slave State, under the lead of Buchanan, shattered the democratic party, and contributed largely to the triumph of the republican or free-soil party of 1860. Douglas had the sagacity to see whither the extreme course of the administration was tending, and the courage to resist it. He led the opposition in the Senate to the Lecompton Constitution, and thereby atoned to some extent, for his instrumentality in the overthrow ofthe Missouri Compromise. He presented, in February, 1858, the remonstrance of the Governor and State officers elect, of Kansas, elected under the Topeka Constitutiftu, against its admission under the Lecompton Constitution. In the debate on this question, Mr. Fessenden, of Maine, said the people of Kansas had thrown a majority of over 10,000 votes against this very Constitution. That the great question through all the Kansas struggle had been, slavery, or no slavery. The leading idea of the repeal of the Missouri Compromise was to make Kan sas a slave State. This was denied by Mr. Douglas, but was reiterated by Mr. Fessenden. A passage occurred in this debate between Mr. Fessenden and Jefferson Davis, of curious interest. Mr. Davis expressed his concurrence not only with the message of the President, but his hearty approbation of the high motives that actuated him when he wrote it. Apparently looking forward to the separation of States, he held that a Senator, while sitting in 100 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the Senate Chamber, was in the relation of a minister to a friendly Court, and that the moment he sees the government in hostility to his own State, his honor, and the honor of his State compel him to vacate the seat he holds. " I am, said he, not in the habit of paying lip service to the Union. If through a life, not now a short one, a large portion of which has been spent in the public service, I have given no better proof of my affection for this Union than my declarations, I have lived to little service indeed. Whatever evil may be in store for us, I trust I shall be able to turn to the past and say, that up to the period when I was declining into the grave, I served a government I loved, and served it with my whole heart." ^ Mr. Fessenden said, " I have avowed no disunion senti ments here or elsewhere. Can the Hon. Senator from Mississippi say as much ?" Mr. Davis, " Yes." Mr. Fessenden, " I am glad to hear him say so, as the newspapers have represented him as making a speech in Mis sissippi, in which he said he came into Mr. Pierce's cabinet a disunion man.'" Although the bill passed the Senate, yet by the determined and powerful opposition of the republican members, aided by a few votes which followed Douglas from the democratic ranks, the measure finally failed. The opposition of Douglas to their schemes exasperated the slaveholding Senators, and they sought to degrade him by removing him from the position which he had long held, of Chairman of the Committee on territories. This was done on motion of the infamous Slidell, of Louisiana. But Douglas never exhibited more commanding ability than when he led the opposition in the Senate to the Lecomp ton cheat. The defeat of this scheme was for him a magnificent Congressional triumph. Buchanan sent his tool, Slidell, to Illinois to organize a third party to defeat Douglas in the approaching canvass for the Senate. But before approaching the great intellectual combat be tween the two champions of the Northwest, Lincoln and THE DRED SCOTT CASE. 101 Douglas, we must mention two or three other important topics which entered into the discussion referred to, and constitute a part of the history of the times. We have seen that the Executive and Legislative Departs ments of the Government had long been under the control of the slaveholders. The Judicial Department, over which had once presided the pure and spotless abolitionist, John Jay, and the great Constitutional lawyer and intellectual giant, John Marshall, had become an object of profound reverence to the people. It had been the arena of the high est forensic discussions, involving the most important ques tions of private rights and Constitutional power. The great advocates of the country, lawyers whose names are classic in forensic literature, Pinckney, Henry, Emmet, Wirt, Mason, Dexter, Webster, Clay, Sargent, Ogden, and others, had there discussed with matchless ability, questions involving State rights, and National sovereignty and power, as well as the laws of Nations, and maritime and municipal law. This court had come to be regarded by the American people as the most dignified, enlightened, and august tribunal on earth. The period had now come in which the National Judiciary was to be prostituted, and American Jurisprudence disgraced by its efforts to uphold and strengthen slavery. JDred Scott, a negro, held as a slave in Missouri, had been voluntarily taken by his master into the free State of Illi nois, and subsequently to Fort Snelling, in territory lying North of the line of 36° 30", where slavery was prohibited by law. Upon the well settled principle of law, a master volun tarily bringing a slave upon territory where slavery is prohibited, the slave becomes free. Dred Scott became a freeman, and he brought suit for his liberty, and the case went up to the Supreme Court of the United States for final decision, was argued, and was to have been decided at the term of 1855. But a majority of the judges, in view ofthe pending Pre~ idential election, and the intense feeling then existing on the slavery question, postponed the decision until the next term, which would be subsequent to the Presidential election. 102 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. That decision, when promulgated, so shocked the moral sense ofthe people, and was such a palpable violation of law and decency, that there is little doubt if published before the election, it would have changed the result. Thecourt, through Chief Justice Taney, held: First, That Dred Scott being descended from an African slave, was not, and could not be a citizen of the United States, and therefore could not maintain a suit in the Federal Cotlrts. This ended the case. But the point had been made that Scott was free by operation of the Missouri Prohibition of 1820. The Chief Justice, and a majority of his associates eagerly seized the opportunity to pronounce the prohibition of slavery un constitutional and void; and they went on to say that by vir tue of the Constitution, slavery existed in all the territories of the United States, and that Congress could not prohibit it. Thus the revolution was complete. The Federal Government was organized upon the princi ple that slavery was local, confined to State limits, and Con gress prohibited it in all the theu existing territories. The Chief Justice, and his associates, now decided that slavery, by virtue of the Constitution, was legal in all the territories, and that the right to take and hold slaves in all the territories, was a right which Congress could not prohibit. The Chief Justice endeavored to show that colored men were not included in the Declaration of Independence, under the language of "all men are created equal, etc.;" but he de clared that "for more than a century before the date of that instrument, they had been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race; and so far inferior, that " they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect;" and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. Mr. Justice Curtiss, in his able, dissenting opinion, showed that so far from this being true, that in the States of New Hampshire, New York, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and North Carolina, negroes had been not only citizens, but elec tors and voters. Mr. Justice Catron, of Tennessee, dissented from the opinion of the court that Congress could not legis late for the territories; he said "More than sixty years have THE DRED SCOTT CASE. 103 passed away since Congress has exercised power to govern territories by its legislation directly, or by territorial charters, subject to repeal; and it is now too late to call in question that power." Thus slavery triumphed in every department of the Gov ernment, and seemed to hold an intrenched and unassailable position. How does George Bancroft, the life long democrat, but with a reputation as a historian, which will not permit him to withhold the truth — when speaking at the grave of Lin coln, and in the presence of Eternity, characterise this decision? He says: The Chief Justice ofthe United States, without any necessity or occasion, volun teered to come to the rescue of the theory of slavery j and from his court there lay no appeal but to the law of humanity and history. Against the Constitution, against the memory of the Nation, against a previous decision, against a series of enactments, he decided that the slave is property ; that slave property is entitled to no less protection than any other property ; that the Constitution upholds it in every territory against any act of a local Legislature, and even against Congress liself ; or, as the President for that term tersely promulgated the saying, " Kansas is as much a slave Statej as Souths Carolina or Georgia; slavery, by virtue of the Constitution, exists in every territory." * I have thus hastily and imperfectly, but I hope sugges tively and truthfully, traced the progress of the slave power in the republic, from the revolution, down. At the close of the revolution, it was a fe,eble, tolerated, local institution. The moral sense and religious convictions, as well as the political sentiments, genius, principles of the republic were against it. But slavery, having in an unfortunate moment, been toler ated by the framers of the Constitution, under the belief that it would be but a temporary evil, soon aspired to power and became the master of the Government. Conscious of its inherent weakness, it demanded additional territory for its expansion. First, Louisiana, then Florida, then the re peal of the Missouri restriction, that it might go North and West, as well as South; then Texas, then the war on Mexico for more territory. Up to the period ofthe Dred Scott deci sion, slavery had generally been successful upon all the issues made with freedom. It was now perfectly absolute on the * Bancroft's oration on Lincoln, p. 13 and W. 104 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. bench ofthe Supreme Court, as was painfully illustrated by the doctrines announced in the Dre.d Scott decision. It controlled the action of Congress. It directed who should be Presi dent; and no party had thus far succeeded, which placed in nomination any man openly hostile to it. The army and the Navy, with West Point, and the Naval school for its nur series, were its right and left hand to carry out its purposes. The control of the National treasure, collected and paid largely in the free States, was in the hands of slaveholders. The slaveholder held the purse and the sword; he ruled at the White House, in Congress, and on the bench of the Supreme Court; and represented the republic at home and abroad. The fairest portion of the republic, with the richest soil and the most genial climate, had been blighted by its curse. That portion of the Union where slavery existed, was comparatively poor, sparsely settled, with little thrift or com fort; with no manufactures, little commerce; very far behind the free States in culture, arts, and intelligence. Contrasted with the South, with its rich, natural advantages, was rocky, cold, bleak, barren New England. Under the influence of free labor, every valley blooming like a garden, her fields smiling with abundant harvests, every hill sheltering a thriv ing village, with every element of comfort; with commerce whitening every sea ; with a skilled and intelligent labor which sends its manufactures to the uttermost parts of the earth. Free labor produces this contrast, and everywhere the passing stranger reads in every object he sees, that liberty dwells among the hills and mountains of New England, while slavery blackens aud desolates the sunny plains of the South. In the free States were to be fouud everywhere, the church, the school house, the comfortable home, the news paper, the library, and everywhere domestic comfort, refine ment, culture, the arts and taste; christian civilization in its highest forms. In the South were a few opulent families living in luxury and ease; families highly educated, refined, of great social attraction, while the great mass of the white people were ignorant, idle, and rude; with the great planta^ tion, the slave-huts, squalor, ignorance, brutality. Slavery ^ EFFECTS OF SLAVERY. 105 everywhere, operating as a moral blight; reducing rapidly a once noble race into barbarism. The effect of slavery in retarding the material prosperity of the country, may be strikingly illustrated by the census tables, and a comparison between the free, and slave States. Taking for illustration. New York and Virginia. By the census, the population of Virginia in 1790, was 748,308, and in 1860, 1,596,318, making the ratio of increase, 113, 32 per cent. In 1790, New York numbered 340,120, and in 1860, 3,880,735, the ratio of increase being 1,040,99. Thus the rate of increase in New York, exceeded that of Virginia, more than nine to one. In 1790, the population of Virginia, was largely more than double that of New York.* In 1860, the population of New York was very largely more than double that of Virginia. In 1790, Virginia, in population, ranked first of all the States, and New York the fifth. In 1860, they had reversed their position, and New York was the first, and Virginia the fifth. At the same rate of progress, from 1860, to 1900, as from 1790 to 1860, Virginia retaining slavery, would have sunk from the first, to the twenty -first State, and would still continue at each scceeding decade, descending the inclined plane toward the lowest position of all the States. Such has been, and still continues to be, the effect of slav- eiy, in dragging down that once great State from the first, toward the last in rank in the Union. But if, as in the ab sence of slavery must have been the case, Virginia had in creased from 1790 to 1860, in the same ratio as New York, her population in 1860, would have been 7,789,141, and she must always have remained the first in rank of all the States. The census proves that slavery greatly retards the increase of wealth. By tables 33 and 36 of the census of 1860, it appears, omit ting commere, that the products of industry, as given, viz : of agriculture, manufactures, mines, and fisheries, were that year, in New York, $606,000,000, cr $156 per capita, and in Virginia, 120,000,000, or $75 per capita. This shows a total value of product in New York, more than five times greater See preliminary census Bep., p. 132. 106 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. than in Virginia, and per capita, more than two to one. In cluding the earnings of commerce and all business not given in the census, it will be shown that the value of the pro ducts and earnings of New York, in 1860, exceeded those of Virginia, at least seven to one.* The war taxes of the Republic may be very great, but the tax of slavery is far greater, and the relief from it, in a few years, will add much more to the National wealth than the whole deduction made by the war debt. The population of the United States would have reached, in 1860, nearly 40,000,000, and our wealth have been more than doubled, if slavery had been extinguished in 1790 ; this is one of the revelations made by the census; whilst in science, in education, and National power, the advance would have been still more rapid, and the moral force of our ex ample and success would have controlled for the benefit of mankind, the institutions of the world. Having shown how much the material progress of Vir ginia, has been retarded by slavery, let us now consider its effect upon her moral and intellectual development. The number of newspapers and periodicals in New York, in lB60, was 542, of which, 365 were political, 56 religious, 63 literary, 58 miscellaneous ; and the number of copies cir culated in 1860, was 320,930,884. The number in Virginia, was 139; of which, 117 were political, 13 religious, 3 literary, 6 miscellaneous; andthe number of copies circulated in 1860, was 26,772,568. Thus the annual circulation of the press in New York, was twelve times as great as that of Virginia. The number of public schools in Virginia, in 1850, was 2,937, teachers 3,005, pupils 67,438, colleges, academies, etc., pupils 10,326, attending school during the year, as returned by families, 109,775; native white adults of the State who cannot read or write, 75,868. Public libraries, 54; volumes, 88,462; value of churches, 2,902,220. By table 165, compendium of census, the per cent- age of native free population in Virginia, over 20 years of age * Most of these calculations are taken from an able pamphlet ofthe Hon. Saxierl J 'Walker. EFFECTS OF SLAVERY, 107 who cannot read or write, is 19.90, andin New York, 1.87; in North Carolina, 30.34; in Maryland, 11.10; in Massachusetts, 32, or less than one-third of one per cent. In New England the per centage of native whites who cannot read or write is 0.42, or less than one-half of one per cent.; and in the Southern States 20.30, or 50 to 1, in favor of New England. But if we take the whole adult population of Virginia, in cluding whites, free blacks and slaves, 42.05 per cent., or nearly one-half cannot read or write, and in North Carolina, more than one-half cannot read or write. We have seen by the above official tables of the census of 1850, that New York, compared with Virginia, had nearly ten times as many pupils at schools, colleges and academies, twenty times as many books in libraries, and largely more than seven times the value of churches; while the ratio of native white adults who cannot read or write, was more than 10 to 1, in Virginia, compared wdth New York. We have seen also, that in North Carolina, nearly one-third of the native white adults, and in Virginia, nearty one-fifth cannot read or write, aud iu New England, 1 in every 400; in New York, 1 in every 131; in the South and Southwest, 1 in every 42 of the native white adults. The comparison of other free and slave States would exhibit the same results. Let us compare for a moment, the two great Western States, Hlinois, a free State, and Missouri, until the rebellion, a sla-ve holding State. The Comparison will furnish just results in regard to the effects of slavery, for while Missouri has increased since 1810, in wealth and population, much more rapidly than any of the slave States, there are several free States whose relative advance has exceeded Illinois. The rapid growth of Mis souri is owing to her immense area, her fertile soil, her mighty rivers (the Mississippi and Missouri,) her central and commanding position, and to the fact, that she had so small a number of slaves to the square mile, as well as to the free population. The population of Illinois, in 1810, was 12,282, and in 1860, 1,711,951; the ratio of increase from 1810 to 1860, being 13,838.70. (Ts-ble, Census I860,) The population of Mis- 108 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. souri, in 1810, was 20,845, and in 1860, 1,182,012; the ratio of increase from 1810 to 1860, being 5,570.48. (Ib.) The rank of Missouri, in 1810, was, 22, and of Illinois, 23. The rank of Missouri in 1860, was 8, and of Illinois, 4. The area of Missouri,is 67,380 square miles, beine the 4th in rank, as to area, of all the States. The area of Illinois is 65,405 square miles, ranking the 10th. Missouri, then has 11,875 more square miles than Illinois. This excess is greater by 749 square miles than the aggregate area of Massachusetts, Delaware, and Rhode Island, containing in 1860, a popular tion of 1,517,902. The population of Missouri per square mile in 1810, exceeded that of Illinois .08; but, in 1860, the population of Missouri per square mile, was 17.54, ranking the 22d, and that of Illinois, 30.90, ranking the 13th. Illi nois, with her ratio to the square mile, and the area of Mis souri, would have had in 1860, a population of 2,082,042; and Missouri, with her ratio and the area of Illinois, would have had in 1860, a population of 971,803, making a differ ence in favor of Illinois, of 1,110,239, instead of 529,939. The absolute increase of population of Illinois per square mile, from 1850 to 1860, was 15.54, and of Missouri, 7.43, Illinois, ranking the 6th, in this ratio, and Missouri, the 14th. These facts prove the vast advantages which Missouri possessed in her larger area, as compared with Illinois. But Missouri, in 1810, we have seen, had nearly double the population of Illinois. Now, reversing their numbers in 1810, the ratio of increase of each remaining the same, the population of Illinois, in 1860, would have been 2,906,014, and of Missouri, 696,983. If we bring the greater area of Missouri as an element into this calculation, the population of Illinois in 1860, would have exceeded that of Missouri, more than two millions and a half. By census table 36, the cash value of the farms of Illinois, in 1860, was $432,531,072, and of Missouri, $230,632,126, making a difference in favor of Illinois, of $201,898,946, which is the loss which Missouri has sustained by slavery in the single item of the value of her farm lands. Abolish slavery there, and the value of the farm lands of Missouri would soon equal those of IlHnois, and augment the wealth EFFECTS OF SLAVERY. 109 of the farmers of Missouri, over two hundred millions of dollars. But these farm lands of Missouri embrace only 19,984,809 acres, (table 36,) leaving unoccupied 23,138,391 acres. The difference between the value of the unoccupied lands of Missouri and Illinois, is six dollars per acre, at which rate the increased value of the unoccupied lands of Missouri, in the absence of slavery, is $148,830,346, Thus it appears, that the loss to Missouri, in the value of her lands, caused by slavery, is $340,729,292. If we add to this diminished value of town and city property in Missouri, from the same cause, the total loss in that State in the value of real estate, exceeds $400,000,000, which is nearly twenty times the value of her slaves. By table 35, the increase in the value of real and personal property of Illinois, from 1850 to 1860, was $715,595,276, being 457.93 per cent, and Missouri, $363,966,691, being 265.18 per cent. At the same ratio of increase from 1860 to 1870, the total wealth of Illinois, would be $3,993,000,000, and of Missouri, $1,329,000,000, the difference being $2,664,- 000,000, caused by slavery, which is more than twice the value of all the slaves in the Union, at the beginning of the slaveholder's war. These comparisons could be extended to all the free, and lately slave States, with the same results. Virginia was a considerable colony when Pennsylvania was occupied exclusively by Indian tribes. In 1790, the population of Virginia exceeded that of Penn sylvania, 313,925, yet in 1860, Pennsylvania exceeded Vir ginia, 1,308,797. The ratio of increase in Virginia, being from 1790 to 1860, 113.32 per cent, and in Pennsylvania, during the same period, 569.03 per cent. The effects of slavery upon morals and civilization will be strikingly illustrated by the barbarities and cruelties of the great civil war, upon a description of which I must soon enter. When it is remembered that there were nearly four millions of people among whom marriage had no legal ex istence, the family relation no legal recognition, where it was a penal offence to teach a negro child to read the Holy Bible; where the chastity ofthe colored woman was without 110 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. protection, where a negro could not be a witness in a court of Justice, the reflecting mind will be able to form a correct estimate of the moral condition of both blacks and whites growing out of this institution of slavery. While idleness, ignorance, license, and the exercise of unrestrained, and irresponsible power growing out of slavery produced its legitimate effects, demoralization, licentiousness, and vice of all kinds, and rapidly reduced a noble rax;e of men, capable of the sublime heroism, and self-denial of the Revolution, to that of a semi-barbarous condition, there were many exceptions, and localities, where the institution was patriarchal in its character, and where the high moral character of the masters, with leisure, means, and taste for intellectual culture, produced a high order of men. There were localities at the South where existed the most attractive and charming illustrations of social culture and re finement. There were families who regarded their position as masters, as responsible trusts; who felt themselves respon sible to God for the moral and physical well-being of their dependants. There were to be found many philanthropists and noble women in the slave States, who devoted themselves to the moral culture and well-being of their servants, with a philantliropy as devoted and self-sacrificing as any that sent the missionary to christianize heathen in foreign lands. There also, were very many specimens of that genial hos pitality, that kindness, grace, and refinement, which gave to social life, at the South, its proverbial charm. But these were becoming more and more exceptional, as the degeneracy, and profligacy, resulting from slavery extended. It is not in human nature to be born, reared, and live with a race, over which is exercised, unrestricted, irresponsible power, subsisting upon its unrequited toil, pampered by idleness, and license, without moral degradation. Especially did slavery unfit the people of the South for the administration of Republican Government. It under mined the purity, simplicity and virtue which must ever be the basis of a successful Republic. BPFECTg OF SLAVERY. Ill The slaveholders, as a class, were tyrants, and loving to erercise power themselves, disregarded the rights of others, and the restraints of law. As a class, the slaveholders would gladly have changed the Government to that of an aristocracy or monarchy, so that it would have secured slavery. They verified the truth stated by Mr. Lincoln in his letter, dated April, 1859, to the republicans of Boston, who celebrated Jefferson's birth-day. He said: This is a world,of compensation, and he who would be no slave, must consent to liave no slave. Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves, and under a just God, cannot long retain it. The degeneracy of the slaveholders, was exhibited but too often and too sadly, during the war. As a class, with many honorable exceptions, they were cruel, treacherous, and barbarous. Now that slavery is extinct, the true manhood of the South ¦will again arise, and regain its former position; we shall again see worthy successors of Washington, Madison, and Jefferson, in Virginia, and the South, who will arise and help to rear, shape, and preserve that vast Continental Republic of justice, intelligence and virtue, which is now to arise. But it is time to return to the sketch of that universal agi tation of the slavery question which produced the slavehold er's rebellion, and in which this institution was to die, as the result of the war brought on by itself, and by which it sought to strengthen and perpetuate its power. OHAPTEE Y. LINCOLN FROM 1857 TO 1860 — THE LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS DEBATES. Lincoln's Nomination por the Senate — His Springpield Speech — He challenges Douglas to Joint Discussion — Douglas Accepts — The Debate — The Meeting at Freeport —Speech at Columbus — At Cincinnati — At Cooper Institute — The " Rail-Splitter." PERHAPS, the man to whom Abraham Lincoln was more indebted for his greatness and his fame, than any other, was his great political rival, Stephen A. Douglas. Mr. Lin coln said, on one occasion, in 1856, of Mr. Douglas, " Twen ty-two years ago, Judge Douglas and I, first became ac quainted; we were both young then — he a trifie younger than I. Even then we were both ambitious, I, perhaps, quite as much as he. With me, the race of ambition has been a failure — a flat failure. With him, it has been one of splendid success. His name fills the Nation, and it is not unknown in foreign lands. I affect no contempt for the high eminence he has reached; so reached that the. oppressed of my species might have shared with me in the elevation , T would rather stand on that eminence, than wear the richest crown that ever pressed a monarch's brow." These great men, alike self-made, self-educated, coming early in life to Illinois, soon became leaders, each of his party. Lincoln had contended for supremacy, in generous emulation with Hardin, Baker, Browning, Logan, and Trumbull. Douglas had had keen rivals in Breese, Shields, Young, McClernand, and others; but in 1857, each was confessedly, the leader of his party in Illinois. No two men were ever more unlike. Physically and mentally, they were contrasts. Lincoln was the real, 112 S. a. DOUGLAS. 113 literal, physical giant; Douglas was "the Little Giant," in person, but a real giant in intellect, as has already been stated. Douglas was bold, unflinching, impetuous, denunciatory, and determined ; possessing in an eminent degree, those qualities which create personal popularity; and he was ever the idol of his friends. His iron will, indomitable energy, firm faith in himself and his cause, united with frank, genial, magnetic manners ; familiar, accessible and generous, made him alto gether one of the strongest men in the Nation. These two men, as has been stated, were members of the Illinois Legislature together, as early as 1836. Douglas had distinguished himself as an able debater and controversialist, in Illinois, in the House of Representatives, and in the Senate of the United States. His position on the slavery question had not been consistent. He had voted for the Wilmot proviso, and to extend the Missouri compromise line across Texas. He finally settled down upon the position of "popular sovereignty," or "squatter sovereignty" as it was called; that is, that the people of each territory should settle the slavery question for themselves. It being, as he declared, his true intent and meaning, " not to legislate slavery into any State or territory, nor to exclude it therefrom, but to leave the people thereof, perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their own way, subject only to the Constitution of the United States." As already stated, he had reported and carried through Congress, the bill to repeal the Missouri Compromise. When Mr. Buchanan's adminis tration became a party to the conspiracy to force Kansas to become a slave State, Douglas was faithful to this principle, and defended the right of the people, to decide freely and fairly, the question for themselves. This brought him in col lision with Buchanan and the slave power, and the slave leaders in the Senate sought to degrade him, by removing him from the Chairmanship of the Committee on Territories. He aided effectually in defeating the scheme to force a pro- slavery Constitution upon Kansas. His Senatorial term was drawing near its close, and in July, 1858, he came home to enter upon the canvass, for reelection. In June, 1858, the Republican State Convention 114 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. met at Springfield, and nominated, with perfect unanimity, and amidst the greatest enthusiasm, Abraham Lincoln, as their candidate for the Senate. The speech which Mr. Lin coln made on that occasion, brief as it is, is one of the most reraarkable in American History. He gave so clear an exposition of the antagonism, and the " irrepressible conflict " between liberty and slavery, that his words immediately seized the attention of the whole Nation, and became histori cal. Up to that time his position on the slavery question, had not entirely satisfied the radical anti-slavery men of Northern Illinois. But when that philosophic speech was pronounced, one of the most radical men present exclaimed, " Lincoln is right in principle, if he is not quite up to us in details;" the man who plants himself on a great principle, will soon be right on all details. Governor Seward, after wards, at Rochester, New York, October 25th, 1868, ex pressed the same idea, in words which have also become memorable. " It is," said he, " an irrepressible conflict between opposing and enduring forces, and it means that the United States will sooner or later become either an entirely slave- holding Nation, or an entirely free labor Nation." The speech of Mr. Lincoln is the text of the great debate between himself and Douglas, and its importance demands its insertion : Me. PEESiDENT, AND GENTLEMEN OK THE CONVENTION: If we could flrst know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could better judge what to do, and how to do it. We are now far into the fifth year, since a policy was initiated with the avowed object, and confident promise of putting an end to slavery agitation. Under the operation of that policy, that agitation has not only not ceased, but has constantly augmented. In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. " A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved— I do not expect the house to fall — but I do ex pect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction ; or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new— North as well as South. Have we no tendency to the latter condition? Let any one who doubts, carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combluation — piece of machinery, so to speak— compounded of tlie Nebraska doctrine, and the Dred Scott decision. Let him consider not only what work the machinery is adapted to do, and how well adapted ; but also let him study the his tory of its construction, and trace, if he can, or rather fall. If he can, to trace the evidences of design, and concert of action, ainong its chief architects, from the beginning. LINCOLN'S SPRINGFIELD SPEECH, JUNE, 1858. 115 The new year of 1854 found slavery excluded llrom more than half the States by State Constitutions, and from most of the National territory by Congressional pro hibition. Four days later, commenced the struggle which ended in repealing that Congressional prohibition. This opened all the National territory to slavery, aud was the flrst point gained. But, so far. Congress only had acted ; and an indorsement by the people, real or apparent, was indispensable, to save the point already gained, and give chance for more. This necessity had not been overlooked ; but had been provided for, as well as might be, in the notable argument of "squatter sovereignty," otherwise called " sacred right of self-government," which latter phrase, though expressive of the only rightful basis of any government, was so perverted in this attempted use ofit as to amount to just this : That if any one man choose to enslave anotiier, no tMrd man shall be aUowed to object. That argument was incorporated into the Nebraska bill itself, in the language which follows : " It being the true intent and meaning of this act not to legislate slavery into any Territory or State, nor to exclude it thereft-om ; but to leave the people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic Institutions in their own way, subject only to the Constitution of the Uni ted States." Then opened the roar of loose declamation in favor of " Squatter Sove reignty," and " sacred right of self-government." "But," said opposition members, " let us amend the biU so as to expressly declare that the people ofthe Territory may exclude slavery." " Not we," said the friends of the measure ; and down they voted the amendment. -While the Nebraska bill was passing through Congress, a law case involving the question of a negro's freedom, by reason of his owner having voluntarily taken him flrst into a free S ate and then into a free Territory covered by the Congressional prohibition, and held him as a slave for a long time in each, was passing through the United States Circuit Court for the District of Missouri ; and both Nebraska bill, and law suit were brought to a decision in the same month of May, 1864. The negro's name was " Dred Scott," which name now designates the decision finally made in the case. Before the then next Presidential election, the law case came to, and was argued in the Supreme Court of the United States ; but the decision of it was de ferred until after the election. Still, before the election. Senator Trumbull, on the floor of the Senate, requested the leading advocate of the Nebraska bill to state his vpinion whether the people of a Territory can Constitutionally exclude slavery from their limits ; and the latter answers : " That is a question for the Supreme Court." The election came. Mr. Buchanan was elected, and the endorsement, such as it was, secured. That was the second point gained. The indorsement, however, fell short of a clear popular majority by nearly four hundred thousand votes, and so, perhaps was not overwhelmingly reliable and satisfactory. The outgoing President, In his last annual message, as impressively as possible echoed back upon the people the weight and authority of the Indorsement. The Supreme Court met again ; did not announce their decision, but ordered a re-argument. The Presidential inaugu ration came, and stUl no decision of the court; but the incoming President in his inaugural address, fervently exhorted the people to abide by the forthcoming decision, whatever it might be. Then in a few days, came the decision. The reputed author of the Nebraska bill flnds au early occasion to make a speech at this capital indorsing the Dred Scott decision, and vehemently denouncing all opposition to it. The new President, too, seizes the .early occasion of the Sil liman letter to indorse and strongly construe that decision, and to express his astonishment that any difl'erent view had ever been entertained ! At length a squabble springs up between the President and the author of the Nebraska bill, on the mere question ot fact, whether the Lecompton Constitution was or was not, in any just sense, made by the people of Kansas ; and in that quar rel the latter delares that aU he wants is a fair vote for the people, and that he cares not whether slavery be voted down or voted up. I do not understand his de claration that he cares not whether slavery be voted down or voted up, to be in tended by him other than as an apt definition of the policy he would Impress upon the ])ublic mind— the principle for which he declares he has suflTered so much, and Is ready to sufl'er to the end. And weU may he cling to that principle. If he 116 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. has any parental feeling, well may he cling to it. That principle is the only shred left of his original Nebraska doctrine. Under the Dred Scott decision, " squatter sovereignty" squatted out of existence, tumbled down Uke temporary scaflToIding— like the mould at the foundry, it served through one blast and fell back into loose sand— helped to carry an election, and then was kicked to the winds. His latejoint struggle with the republicans, against the Lecomptlon Constitution, involves nothing of the original Nebraska doctrine. That struggle was made on a point— the right of the people to make their o-nm Constitution — upon which he and the republicans have never difl-ered. The several points of the Dred Scott decision, in connection with Senator Doug las' "care not" policy, constitute the piece of machinery, in its present state of ad vancement. This was the third point gained. The working points of that machinery are : First, That no negro slave, imported as such from Africa, and no descendant of such slave, can ever be a citizen of any State, in the sense of that term as used in the Constitution of the United States. This point Is made in order to deprive the negro, in every possible event, of the benefit of that provision of the United States Constitution, which declares " That citizens of each State shaU be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States." Secondly, That " subject to the Constitution of the United States," neither Con gress nor a Territorial Legislature can exclude slavery from any United States ter ritory. This point is made in order that-indi-vidual men may fill up the Territories with slaves, without danger of losing them as property, and thus to enhance the chances of permanency to the institution through aU the future. Thirdly, That whether the holding a negro in actual slavery, in a free State, makes him free, as against the holder, the United States courts wlU not decide, but will leave to be decided by the courts of any slave State the negro may be forced into by the master. This point is made, not to be pressed immediately ; but, if ac quiesced in for awhile, and apparently indorsed by the people at an election, then to su.stain the logical conclusion that what Dred Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free State of Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with any other one, or one thousand slaves, in Illinois, or in any other free State. Auxiliary to all this, and working hand in hand with it, the Nebraska doctrine, or what is left of it, is to educate and mould public opinion, at least Northern pub lic opinion, not to care whether slavery is voted down or voted ujd. This shows exactly where we now are ; and partially, also, whither we are tending. It will throw additional light on the latter, to go back, and run the mind over'the string of historical facts already stated. Several things will now appear less dark and mysterious than they did when they were transpiring. The people were to be left " perfectly free," "subject only to the Constitution." -What the Constitution had to do with it, outsiders could not then see. Plainly enough now, it was an ex actly fitted niche, for the Dred Scott decision to afterwards come in, and declare the perfect freedom of the people, to be just no freedom at all. "Why was the amend ment expressly declaring the right of the people, voted down ? Plainly euougli now : the adoptionof it would have spoiled the niche for the Dred Scott decision. Why was the court decision held up? "Why even a Senator s individual opinion withheld, till after the Presidential election ? Plainly enough now : the speaking out tlien would have damaged the perfectly free argument upon which the election Avas to be carried. Why the outgoing President's felicitation on the indorsement ? Why the delay of a re-argument? -Why the incoming President's advance exhor tation in favor of the decision ? These things look like the cautious patting and petting of a spirited horse preparatory to mounting him, when it is dreaded that he may give the rider a fall. And why the hasty after-indorsement of the decision by the President and others ? We cannot absolutely know that all these exact adaptations are the result of pre concert. But when wc see a lot of framed timbers, different portions of which we know have been gotten out at difl'erent times and places and by difFereJit work men—Stephen, Franklin, Roger, and James, for instance* — and when we see these timbers joined together, and see they exactly make the frame of a house or a mill, 'Stephen A. Douglas, Franklin Pierce, Roger B. Taney, and James Buchanan. LINCOLN'S SPRINGFIELD SPEECH, JUNE, 1868. 117 all the tenons aud mortices exactly fltting, and all the lengths and proportions of the dilTerent pieces exactly adapted to their respective places, aud not a piece too many or too few — not omitting even scafi-oldlng — or, if a single piece be lacking, we see the place in the frame exactly fltted and prepared yet to bring such piece in — In such a case, we flnd it impossible not to believe that Stephen, and Franklin, and Roger, and James, all understood one another from the beginning, and all worked upon a common plan or draft drawn up before the flrst blow was struck. It should not be overlooked that, by the Nebraska bill, the people of a State as well as Territory, were to be left " perfectly free," " subject only to the Constitu tion." Why mention a State? They were legislating for Territories, and not for or about States. Certainly the people of a State are and ought to be subject to the Constitution of the United States ; but why is mention of this, lugged into this merely Territorial law ? Why are the people of a Territory and the people of a State therein lumped together, and their relation to the Constitution therein treated as being precisely the same? "While the opinion of the court, by Chief Justice Taney, in the Dred Scott case, and the separate opinions of all the concur ring Judges, expressly declare that the Constitution of the United States neither permits Congress nor a Territorial Legislature to exclude slavery from any United States Territory, they aU omit to declare whether or not the same Constitution per mits a State, or the people of a State, to exclude it. Possibly, this is a mere omis sion ; but who can be quite sure, if Mr. McLean or Curtis had sought to get into the opinion a declaration of unlimited power in the people of a State to exclude slav ery from their limits. Just as Chase and Mace sought to get such declaration, iu be half of the people of a Territory, into the Nebraska bill; — I ask who can be quite sure that it would not have been voted down in the one ca.se as it had been in the other ? The nearest approach to the point of declaring the power of a Sl^ate over .slavery, is made by Judge Nelson. He approaches it more than once, using the pre cise idea, and almost the language, too, of the Nebraska act. On one occasion, his exact language is, " except in cases where the power is restrained by the Constitu tion of the United States, the law of the State is supreme over the subject of slav ery within its jurisdiction." In what cases the -goyter of the States is so restrained by the United States Constitution, is left an open question, precisely as the same question, as to the restraint on the power of the Territories, was left open in the Nebraska act. Put this and that together, and we have another nice little niche, which we may, ere long, see-filled with another Supreme Court decision, de claring that the Constitution of the United States does not permit a Slate to exclude slavery from its limits. And this may especially be expected if the doctrine of " care not whether slavery be voted down or voted up," shall gain upon the public mind sufficiently to give promise that such a decision can be maintained when made. Such a decision is aU that slavery now lacks of being alike lawful in all tlie States. Welcome, or unwelcome, such decision is probably coming, and will soon be upon us, unless the power of the present political dynasty shall be met and overthrown. We shall lie down pleasantly dreaming that the people of Missouri are on the verge of making their State free, and we shall awake to the reality in stead, that the Supreme Court has made lUinois a slave State. To meet and over throw the power of that dynasty, is the work now before all those who would prevent that consummation. That is what we have to do. How can we best do it ? There are those who denounce us openly to their own friends, and yet whisper to us softly, that Senator Douglas is the aptest instrument there is with which to efi'ect that object. They wish us to infer all, from the fact that he now has a little quarrel with the present head of the dynasty; and that he has regularly voted with us on a single point, upon which he and we have never difl-ered. They remind us that he is a great man, and that the largest of us are very small ones. Let this be granted. But "a living dog is better than a dead lion." Judge Douglas, if not a dead lion for this work, is at least a caged and toothless one. How can he oppose the ad vances of slavery? He dont care anything about it. His avowed mission is im pressing the " public heart " to eare nothing abotit ii. A leading Douglas democratic newspaper thinks Douglas' superior talent wiU be needed to resist the revival of the African slave trade. Does Douglas believe an efl'ort to revive that trade is ap proaching ? He has not said so. Does he really think so ? But if it is, how can he 118 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. resist It? For years he has labored to prove it a sacred right of white men to take negro slaves Into the new Territories. Can he possibly show that it is less a sacred right to buy them where they can be bought cheapest? And unquestionably they can be bought cheaper in Africa tlian in Virginia. He has done all in his power to reduce the whole question of slavery to one of a mere right of property ; and aa such, how can he oppose the foreign slave trade— how can he refuse that trade in that "property" shall be "perfectly free " — unless he does it as a protection to the home production ? And as the home producers will probably not ask the protection, he will be wholly without a ground of opposition. Senator Douglas liolds, we know, that a man may rightfuUy be wiser to-day than he was yesterday— that he may rightfully change when he finds himself wrong. But can we, for that reason, run ahead, and infer that he wil! make any particular change, of which he, himself, has given no intimation ? Can we safely base our action upon any such vague inference ? Now, as ever, I wish not to misrepresent Judge Douglas' position, question his motives, or do aught that can be personally offensive to him. Whenever, if ever, he and we can come together on principle so that our cause may have assistance from his great ability, I hope to have inter posed no adventitious obstacle. But clearly, he is not now with us — he does not pretend to be — ho does not promise ever to be. Our cause, then, must be intrusted to, and conducted by, its own undoubted friends — those whose hands are free, whose hearts are in the work — who do care for the result . Two years ago the republicans of the nation mustered over thirteen hun dred thousand strong. We did this under the single Impulse of resistance to a com mon danger, with every external circumstance against us. Of strange, discordant, and even hostile elements, we gathered from the four winds, and formed aud fought the battle through, under the constant hot fire of a disciplined, proud and pampered enemy. Did we brave all then, to falter now? — now, when that same enemy is wavering, dissevered and belligerent? The result is not doubtful. We shall not fail— if we stand firm, -we shall not fall. Wise counsels may accelerate, or mistakes delay it, but, sooner or later, the victory is sure to come. There is a tone of solemnity and deep apprehension in this speech of Lincoln. After describing in words so clear and simple that none could misunderstand, the conspiracy to ex tend slavery to all the States, he says: " We shall lie down, pleasantly dreaming that the people of Missouri are on the eve of making that a free State, and we shall awake to the reality instead, that the Supreme Court has made Illinois a slave State. To meet and overthrow the power of that dynasty, is the work of all who would prevent that consummation. This is what we have to do." To this work his life was henceforth devoted. He brought to the tremendous struggle, physical strength and endur ance almost superhumah; an intellect trained to present and discuss political questions to the comprehension of the American mind, and with a success never equalled by any other American orator or statesman. In allusion to the disposition manifested outside of Illinois, and especially by the New York Tribune,to sustain Douglas, he said, " our cause must be entrusted to, and conducted by, its LINCOLN'S SPEECH AT SPRINGFIELD, JUNE, 1868. 119 own undoubted friends; those whose hands are free, and whose hearts are in the work. We ' do care ' for the result, alluding to Douglas' statement, that he " did not care whether slavery was voted up or voted down." He concludes in the language of hopeful prophesy. " We shall not fail, wise counsels may accelerate or mistakes delay it, but sooner or later, victory is sure to come," Such was the high philosophic appreciation by Lincoln, of the conflict then pending before the American people. The first battle was to be the intellectual combat between him and Senator Douglas; a contest made in the watchful, anxious view of all the people of the Union. Liberty against slavery was the clearly defined issue. The Senatorial debate between Webster and Hayne, is historical; that involved questions of Constitutional construction, State rights, and theories of Government. The contest between Lincoln and Douglas involved the triumph of freedom in Kansas, and in the Union. It was not a single debate, but extended through a whole campaign. The great political parties throughout the country, paused to watch its progress, and looked with eager solicitude upon every movement of the champions. Mr. Douglas arrived at Chicago, from Washington, on the 9th of July, and was recieved with the most enthusiastic demonstrations by his friends. He addressed himself to re ply to Mr. Lincoln's Springfield speech. Lincoln was present and heard the speech of Douglas, and replied to it the even ing afterward. On the 16th of July, Mr. Douglas spoke at Bloomington, and Mr. Lincoln was present. Douglas again addressed the people at Springfield, on the 17th of July, to which Mr. Lincoln replied in the evening. Thereupon Mr. Lincoln addressed to Mr. Douglas the following note, challenging him to the joint debate: Chicago, July 24th, 1868. Hon. S. A. DO0QI.AS, My Dear Sir,- WUl it be agreeable to you to make an arrangement to divide time, and address the same audience, during the present canvass 7 etc. Mr. Judd Is authorized to receive your answer, and if agreeable to you, to enter into the terms of such agreement, etc. Your ob't serv't, A. LINCOLN. 120 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. The challenge was accepted, and it was arranged that there should be seven joint debates; each champion alter nately opening and closing the discussion ; the opening speech to occupy one hour, the reply one hour and a half, and the close a half hour, so that each debate should occupy three hours. They were to speak at Ottawa, August 21st; Freeport, Au gust 27th; Jonesboro, September 15th; Charleston, Septem ber 18th; Galesburg, October 7th; Quincy, October 13th; Alton, October 16th. These debates, held in different sec tions of the State, and in the open air, called together vast crowds of people. There was every motive to stimulate the champions to the exertion of thefr utmost power. Each en tertained a sincere conviction, that in the principles he advo cated was involved the safety, and perhaps the life of the Republic. The debates, with one exception, were conducted -with the dignity and courtesy which were becoming the occasion. The Senatrrship was the immediate personal prize for the victor, and in the future, the Presidency, for which Douglas had been long an aspirant. They discussed all the great polit ical questions of the day, but each felt instinctively, that the vital question, the question of questions, was slavery. The question of slavery in the territories, the Dred Scott decision, the fugitive slave law, the opinions of the Fathers, above all the meaning of the Declaration of Independence enumerating the inalienable rights of man, were the topics of discussion. Douglas wen t through this canvass with the manner and bearing of a conquering hero. There was something grand, exciting, and magnetic, in the boldness with which he threw himself into the discussion, and dealt his blows right and left against the republican party on one side, and the administration of Bu chanan, which sought his defeat, on the other. Buchanan sought, by the use of Executive patronage and power, to de feat Douglas. He succeeded in seducing a few, but the mass of the party stood firmly by the Senator. Douglas and his friends were most liberal in their expenditures. He had his special trains of cars, his bands of music, his processions with banners and cannon, and all the paraphanalia of a great leader. Lincoln on the contrary, conducted the canvass in a THE LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS DEBATE. 121 plain, simple, frugal unostentatious manner. Some idea of the simplicity of the man and his manners, may be gathered from a remark he made at the close of the debates, in which he said to a friend, " I don't believe I have expended in this canvass one cent less than five hundred dollars in cash." Senator Douglas was at this time, undoubtedly the leading debater in the United States Senate. For years he had been accustomed to meet the trained leaders of the Nation in Congress; and never, either in single combat, or receiving the fire of a whole party, had he been discomfited. His style was bold, defiant, aggressive, vigorous. He was fertile in resources, terrible in denunciation, familiar with political his tory, and handled with readiness and facility, all the contro versial weapons of debate; of indomitable physical and moral courage, and unquestionably the most formidable man in the Nation on the stump. The friends of Lincoln were not with out anxiety when the challenge for a campaign on the stump was given and accepted. Lincoln was candid, cool, truthful, logical, philosophical; never betrayed into an unfair state ment. The criticism upon him as a lawyer, was verified and illustrated in these debates. " On the right side of a case, Lincoln is an overwhelming giant, on the wrong side, his sense , of justice and'right, makes him weak." Douglas' ardour al ways made him, for the time, believe that the side he adopted was right. Lincoln argued the side of freedom with the most profound conviction that its triumph was necessary to the existence of his country. It was wonderful, how strongly in these discussions, as in all the acts of his public life, he impressed the people with his fairness, honesty, and truth fulness; every hearer in the vast crowds which thronged to these discussions, whatever his political views, went away with the conviction, " Lincoln believes what he says, he is candid, he would not mistate a fact, or take an unfair advantage to secure a triumph." He had one advantage over Douglas, he was always good- humoured; he had always an apt and happy story for illus tration, and while Douglas was sometimes irritable, Lincoln never lost his temper. Douglas carried away the most popular applause, but Lincoln made the deeper and more lasting 122 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. impression. Douglas did not disdain an immediate, ad cap tandum triumph, while Lincoln aimed at permanent convic tion. Douglas addressed prejudice, and especially the prejudice against the negro, with an adroitness and power never surpassed. Lincoln stated his propositions, and sustained them with the fullest histoiical knowledge and illustration, and .with irresistible logic. Douglas, owing to the favorable and unfair apportionment of the Senators and Representatives in the State Legislature, secured a majority, and obtained the Sena- torship ; although a majority of the popular vote was recorded against him. These debates made Douglas, Senator, and Lincoln, President. At the close of these debates, and of the canvass, the cham pions visited the city -of Chicago, at about the same time. Lincoln was in perfect health, his face bronzed by the prai rie suns, but looking and moving like a trained athlete. His voice was clearer, stronger, and better than when he began the canvass. Douglas was physically, much broken. He was so hoarse that he could scarcely articulate, and was entirely unintelligible in an ordinary tone. Few men living could have gone through these open air discussions without break ing down, and few could have recovered from them so soon. Douglas' speedy recovery, exhibited his wonderful vigor and elasticity. The most prominent feature of Mr. Lincoln's speeches in this canvass is his constant reference to the Declaration of Independence. Mr. Douglas knew that in Illinois, at that time there was a deep seated, nearly universal prejudice against the negro. He sought continually, to use that pre judice against Mr. Lincoln; sometimes most unfairly misre presenting him to be in favor of social, as well as political equality, between the races. The points made by Lincoln in these debates, were: First, That the country could not permanently endure half slave and half free, and that slavery was wrong in itself. Second, He attacked the popular sovereignty doctrine of Douglas. His clear, simple statement ofit, was its crushing THE LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS DEBATE. 123 refutation. He said it meant simply, " if one man choose to enslave another, no third man shall be allowed to object." Third, He announced and endeavored to prove the exist ence of a conspiracy to perpetuate and nationalize slavery, and that the Kansas-Nebraska bill, and Dred Scott decisions, were essential parts of this scheme. , The point to which he most often recurred, was the defence of the Declaration of Independence, establishing as the very basis of our government, the inalienable rigjits of man; planting himself on the great principles of the Declaration, which received alike the homage of his heart and the sanc tion of his intellect. This devotion to the grand idea of man's liberty and equality is the key note of the debate. In his speech at Chicago, July 10th, 1858, in reply to Douglas,, for the purpose of showing that all men were included in the " Declaration of Independence," he says : We have besides these men descended by blood from our ancestors— among us, perhaps half our people, who are not descendants at all of these men ; they are men who have come from Europe, Gerinan, Irish, French, and Scandinavian — men that have come from Europe themselves, or whose ancestors have come hither and settled here, flnding themselves our equals in all things. If they look back through this history to trace their connection with those days by blood, they flnd they have none, they cannot carry themselves back into that glorious epoch and make themselves feel that they are part of us ; that when they look through that old Declaration of Independence, they find that those old men say that, " We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal," and then they feel that that moral sentiment taught in that day, evidences their relation to those men ; — that it is the father of all moral principle lu them, and they have a right to claim it as though they were blood of the blood, and fiesh of the fiesh, of the men who wrote that Declaration, and so they are. That is the electric cord in that Declaration that Unks the hearts of patriotic and liberty-loving men together, tha.t win link those patriotic hearts as long as the love of freedom exists in the minds of men throughout the world. Again he said at Springfield, July 17th, 1858, in reply to Douglas : I adhere to the Declaration of Independence. If Judge Douglas and his friends are not wllUng to stand by it, let them come up and amend it. Let them make it read that all men are created equal, except negroes. Let us have it decided, whether the Declaration oflndependence, in this blessed year of 1858, shall be thus amended. In his construction of the Declaration last year, he said it only meant that Ameri cans in America, were equal to Englishmen in England. Then when I pointed out to him that by that rule he excludes the Germans, tlie Irish, the Portuguese, and all the other people who have come amongst us since the Revolution, he reconstructs his construction. In his last speech he teUs us it meant Europeans. I press him a lit tle further, and ask if it meant to include the Russians in Asia ? or does he mean to excludethatvastpopulation from theprinciples of the Declaration of Independence? I expect ere long he wUl introduce another amendment to his definition. He Is 124 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. not at all particular. He is satisfied with anything which does not endanger the nationalizing of negro slavery. It may draw white men down, but it must not lift negroes up. Who shall say, " I am the superior, and you are the Inferior? " My declarations npon this subject of negro slavery may be misrepresented, but cannot be misunderstood. I have said that I do not understand the Declaration to mean that all men were created equal in aU respects. They are not our equal in color ; but I suppose that it does mean to declare that aU men are equal in some respects; they are equal in their right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." , Certainly the negro is not our equal in color— perhaps not in many other re spects ; still, in the right to put into his mouth the bread that his own hands have earned, he is the equal of every other man, white or black. In pointing out that more has been given you, you cannot be justified in taking away the Uttle which has been given him. All I ask forthe negro is, that if you do not like him, let him alone. If God gave him but little, that little let him enjoy. Again in August, at Ottawa, he said : I hold that there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to aU the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I hold that he is as much entitled to these as the white man. I agree with Judge Douglas, he is not my equal in many respects — certainly not in color, perhaps not in moral or intellectual endowment. But in the right to eat the bread, without the leave of anybody else, which his own hand earns, he is my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas, aud the equal of every Uving man. At Galesburg, October, 1868, he said : The Judge has alluded to the Declaration of Independence, and insisted that ne groes are not Included in that Declaration ; and that it is a slander upon the fram ers of that Instrument, to suppose that negroes were meant therein; and he asks you : " Is it possible to believe that Mr. Jefferson, who penned the immortal paper, could have supposed himself applying the language of that instrument to the ne gro race, and yet held a portion of that race in slavery 7 Would he not at once have freed them?" I only have to remark upon this part of the Judge's speech, and that briefiy, that I believe the entire records of the world, from the date of the Declara tion of Independence up to within three years ago, may be searched in vain for one single affirmation, from one single man, that the negro was not included in the Declaration of Independence; I think I may defy Judge Douglas to show that he ever said so, that Washington ever said so, that any President ever said so, that any member of Congress ever said so, or that any living man upon the whole earth ever said so, until the necessities of the present policy of the Democratic party, in regard to slavery, had to invent that affirmation. And I will remind Judge Doug las and this audience, that while Mr. Jefferson was the owner of slaves, as undoubt edly he was, in speaking upon this very subject, he used the strong language that " he trembled for his country when he remembered that God was Just;" and I will oflTer the highest premium in my power to Judge Douglas if he wiU show that he, in all his life, ever uttered a sentiment at all akin to that of Jefferson. I have said once before, and I will repeat it now, that Mr. Clay, when he was once answering an objection to the Colonization Society, that it had a tendency to the ultimate emancipation of the slaves, said that " those who would repress all ten dencies to liberty and ultimate emancipation must do more than put down the benevolent efforts of the Colonization Society — they must go back to the era of our liberty and independence, and muzzle the cannon that thunders its annual joyous return— they must blot out the moral lights around us — they must penetrate the human soul, and eradicate the Ught of reason and the love of liberty !" and I do think— 1 repeat, though I said it on a former occasion— that Judge Douglas, and THE LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS DEBATE. 125 whoever like him teaches that the negro has no share, humble though it may be. In the Declaration of Independence, is going back to the era of our liberty aud in dependence, and, so far as in him lies, muzzling the cannon that thunders its an nual joyous return; that he is blowing out the moral lights around us, when he contends that whoever wants slaves has a right to hold them ; that he is penetrat ing, so far as lies in his power, the human soul, and eradicating the light of reason and the love of liberty, when he is lu every possible way preparing the public mind, by his vast influence for making the institution of slavery perpetual and national. » At Alton, October 15th, 1858, he said : At Galesburg the other day, I said in answer to Judge Douglas, that three years ago there never had been a man, so far as I knew or believed, in the whole world, who had said that the Declaration of Independence did not include negroes in the term " aU men." I reassert it to-day. I assert that Judge Douglas, and all his friends, may search the whole records of the country, and it will be a matter of great astonishment to me if they shall be able to find that one human being three years ago, had ever uttered the astounding sentiment that the term " all men " in the Declaration did not include the negro. Do not let me be misunderstood. I know that more than three years ago, there were men who, finding this assertion constantly in the way of their schemes to bring about the ascendency and perpetua tion of slavery, denied the truth of iL I know that Mr. Calhoun, and all the politi cians of his school, denied the truth of the Declaration. I know that it ran along in the mouth of some Southern men for a period of years, ending at last in that shameful though rather forcible declaration of Pettit, of Indiana, upon the floor of the United States Senate, that the Declaration of Independence was in that respect " a self-evident lie," rather than a self-evident truth. But I say, with a perfect knowledge of aU this hawking at the Declaration without directly attacking it, that three years ago, there never had lived a man who had ventured to assail it in the sneaking way of pretending to believe it, and then asserting it did not include the negro. I believe the first man who ever said it, was Chief Justice Taney, In the Dred Scott case, and the next to him was our friend, Stephen A. Douglas. And- now it has become the catch-word of the entire party. I would like to call upon his friends everywhere, to consider how they have come in so short a time to view thfe matter in a way so entirely different from their former belief ? — to ask whether they are not being bome along by an irresistible current — whither, they know not ? But, perhaps, the noblest and sublimest utterance in all these protracted debates, were the words he uttered at Alton " Is slavery wrong?" That is the real issue. That is the issue that will continue in this country when these poor tongues of Judge Douglas and myself shall be silent. It is the eternal struggle between these two principles— right and wrong— throughout the world. Theyare two principles that have stood face to face from the beginning of time ; and will ever continue to struggle. The one is the common right of humanity, and the other the divine right of Kings. It is fhe same principle in whatever shape it developes itself. It is the same spirit that says, " You work, and toil, and earn bread, and I'll eat it." No matter in what shape it comes, whether from the mouth of a King who seeks to bestride the people of his own nation and live by the fruit of their labor, or from one race of men as an apology for enslaving another race, it is the same tyrannical principle. It required some nerve in Lincoln, in a State where the prejudice against the negro was so strong that the people 126 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. would neither let him vote nor testify, nor serve on a jury, to stand up and proclaim the right of the negro to all the rights in the Declaration of Independence. Mr. Lincoln stated, " that up to the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, he had lived in the hope that slavery was in the course of ultimate extinction :" The adoption of the Constitution and its attendant history led the people to be Ueve so ; and that such was the belief of the framers of the Constitution itself. Why did those old men, about the time of the adoption of the Constitution, de cree that slavery should not go into the new territory, where it had not already gone? Why declare that within twenty years the African slave trade, by which slaves are supplied, might, be cut off by Congress? Why were all these acts? I might enumerate more of these acts— but enough. What were they but a clear indication that the framers of the Constitution intended and expected the ultimate extinction of that institution ? And now, when I say, as I said in my speech that Judge Douglas has quoted from, when I say that I think the opponents of slavery wlU resist the farther spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest ¦with the belief that it is in course of ultimate extinction, I only mean to say, that they wlU place it where the founders of this Government originally placed it. He thus describes his appreciation of the momentous issue : I do not claim, gentlemen, to be unselflsh ; I do not pretend that I would not like to go to the United States Senate ; I make no such hypocritical pretence ; but I do say to you that in this mighty issue, it is nothing to the mass of the people of the Nation, whether or not Judge Douglas or myself shall ever be heard of, after this night; it may hea trifle to either of us, but in connection with this mighty question, upon which hang the destinies of the Nation, perhaps, it is absolutely nothing. Judge Douglas, in the speech at Bloomington, July 16th, 1858, indicated the style in which he desired to conduct the debate : The Republican Convention, when it assembled at Springfleld, did me and the country the honor of indicating the man who was to be their standard-bearer, and the embodiment of their principles, in this State. I owe them my gratitude for thus making up a direct issue between Mr. Lincoln and myself. I shaU have no controversies of a personal character with Mr. Lincoln. I have known him well for a quarter of a century. I have known him, as you all know him, a kind- hearted, amiable gentleman, a, right good fellow, a worthy citizen, of eminent ability as a la-wyer, and I have no doubt, sufflcient ability to make a good Senator. The question, then, for you to decide is, whether his principles are more in accord ance with the genius of our free institutions, the peace and harmony of the Repub lic, than those which I advocate. He tells you, in his speech made at Springfleld, before the convention which gave him his unanimous nomination, that: " A house divided against itself cannot stand." " I believe this Government cannot endure permanently, half slave and half free." " 1 do not expect the Union to be dissolved— I don't expect the house to fall— but I do expect It wlU cease to be divided. It wUl become aU one thing or all the other." THE LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS DEBATE. 127 Mr. Lincoln in his speech at Quincy, indicated the gravity of the great drama : He, Douglas, said, too, " that he should not concern himself with Trumbull any more, but thereafter he should hold Lincoln responsible for the slanders upon him." When I met him at Charleston after that, although I think that I should not have noticed the subject if he had not said he would hold me responsible for it, I spread out before him the statements of the evidence that Judge Trumbull had used, and I asked Judge Douglas, piece by piece, to put his finger upon one piece of all that evidence that he would say was a forgery ! When I went through with each and every piece. Judge Douglas did not dare then to say that any piece of it was a for gery. So it seems that there are some things that Judge Douglas dares to do, and some that he dares not to do. A voice — " It's the same thing with you." , Mr. Lincoln — Yes, sir, it's the same thing with me. I do dare to say " forgery," when it's true, and I don't dare to say " forgery," when it's false. Now, I will say here, to this audience, and to Judge Douglas, I have not dared to say he committed a forgery, and I never shall until I know it; but I did dare to say —Just to suggest to the Judge — that a forgery had been committed, which by his own showing, had been traced to him and two of his friends. I dared to suggest to him that he had expressly promised in one of his public speeches to investigate that matter, and I dared to suggest to him that there was an implied promise that when he investi gated it he would make known the result. I dared to suggest to the Judge that he could not expect to be quite clear of suspicion of that fraud, for since the time that promise was made, he had been with those friends, and had not kept his promise in regard to the investigation and the report upon it. I am not a very daring man, but I dared that much, Judge, and I am not much scared about it yet. When the Judge says he would' nt have believed of Abraham Lincoln that he would have made such an attempt as that, he reminds me of the fact that he entered upon this canvass with the purpose to treat me courteously ; that touched me somewhat. It sets me to thinking. I was aware, when it was first agreed that Judge Douglas and I were to have these seven joint discussions, that they were the successive acts of a drama— per haps I should say, to be enacted not merely in the face of audiences like this, but in the fkce of the nation, and to some extent, by my relation to him, and not from anything in myself, in the face of the world; and I am anxious that they should be conducted with dignity and in good temper, which would be beflting the vast audience before which it was conducted. But when Judge Douglas got home from Washington and made his first speech In Chicago, the evening afterward I made some sort of a reply to it. His second speech was made at Bloomington, in which he commented upon my speech at Chicago, and said that I had used language ingeniously contrived to conceal my intentions, or words to that efiTect. Now, I understand that this is an imputation upon my veracity and my candor. I do not know what the Judge understood by It, but in our flrst discussion at Ottawa, he led oflT by charging a bargain, somewhat corrupt in its character, upon Trumbull and myiself; that we had entered into a bargain, one of the terms of which was that Trumbull was to abolitionize the old democratic party, and I, (Lincoln,) was to abolitionize the old whig party ; — I pre tending to be as good an old line whig as ever. Judge Douglas may not understand that he implicated my truthfulness and honor, when he said I was doing one thing and pretending another; and I misunderstood him if he thought he was treating me in a dignified way, as a man of honor and truth, as he now claims he was disposed to treat me. Even after that time, at Galesburg, when he brings forward an extract from a speech raade at Chicago, and an extract from a speech made at Charleston, to prove that I was trying to play a double part— that I was trying to cheat the public, and get votes upon one set of principles at one place, and upon another set of princi ples at another place. I do not understand but what he impeaches my honor, my veracity, and my candor, and because he does this, I do not understand that I am bound, if I see a trathful ground for it, to keep my hands ofT of him. As soon as T 128 '. LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. learned that Judge Douglas was disposed to treat me in this way, I signified in one of my speeches, that I should be driven to draw upon whatever of humble resources I might have — to adopt a new course with him. I was not entirely sure that I should be able to hold my own with him, but I at least had the purpose made to do as well as I could upon him ; and now I say that I will not be the flrst to cry "hold." I think it originated with the Judge, and when he quits, I probably will. But I shall not ask any favors at all. He asks me, or he asks the audience, if I wish to pu.sh this matter to the point of personal difficulty ? I tell him, no. He did not make a mistake, in one of his early speeches, when he called me an amiable man, though perhaps he did when he called me an " intelligent " man. It really hurts me very much to suppose that I have wronged anybody on earth. I again tell him, no ! I very much prefer, when this canvass shall be over, however it may result, that we at least part without any bitter recollections of personal difficulties. These discussions were generally grave, but Lincoln could not at all times refrain from humour. In his speech at Springfield, July 17th, 1858, he said: Senator Douglas is of world-wide renown. All the anxious politicians of his party, or who have been of his party for years past, have been looking upon him as certainly, at no distant day, to be the President of the United States. They have seen in his round, jolly, fruitful face, post-offices, land-offices, marshalships, and cab inet appointments, chargeships, foreign missions , and sprouting out in wonderful exuberance, ready to be laid hold of by their greedy hands. And as thej' have been gazing upon this attractive picture so long, they cannot, in the little distraction that has taken place in the party, bring themselves to give up the charming hope, but with greedier anxiety they rush about him, sustain him, and give him marches, triumphal entries, and receptions beyond what, even in the days of his highest prosperity, they could have brought about iu his favor. On the contrary, nobody has ever expected me to be President. In my poor, lean, lank face, nobody has ever seen that any cabbages were sprouting out. These are disadvantages, all taken together, that the republicans labor under. JVe have to flght this battle upon principle alone. I am, in a certain sense, made the standard- bearer in behalf of the republicans. I was made so merely because there had to be some one so placed — I being in nowise preferable to any other one of the tweuty- flve— perhaps a hundred, we have in the republican ranks. Then I wish it to be distinctly understood and borne lu mind, that we have to fight this battle without many — perhaps without any — of the external aids which are brought to bear against us. So I hope those with whom I am surrounded have principle enough to nerve themselves for the task, and leave nothing undone that can be faiily done, to bring about the right result. After Senator Douglas left Washington, his movements were made known by the public prints ; he tarried a considerable time in the city of New York ; and it was heralded that, like another Napoleon, he was lying by and framing the plan of his campaign. I think I have been able to see what are the material points of that plan. They were not very numerous. The flrst is "popular sovereignty." The second and third are attacks upon my speech made on the I6thof June. Out of these three points — drawing within the range of popular sovereignty the question of the Le compton Constitution —he makes his principal assault. Upon these his .successive speeches are substantially one and the same. On this matter of popular sove reignty I wish to be a little careful. Auxiliary to these main points, to be sure, are their thunderings of cannon, their marching and music, their fizzle-gigs, and flre- works ; but I will not waste time with them. They are but the little trappings of the campaign. Coming to the substance — the first point — "popular sovereignty," is to be la belled upon the cars in which he travels ; put upon the hacks he rides in ; to be flaunted upon the arches he passes under, and the banners which wave over him. It is to be dished up in as many varieties as a French cook can i reduce soups from potatoes. THE LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS DEBATE. 129 Lincoln again expresses his -views of the importance of the slavery question : Although I have ever been opposed to slavery, so far I rested In the hope and beUef that it waa in the course of ultimate extinction. I might have been mis taken ; but I had believed, aud now believe, that the whole public mind, that is, the mind of the great majority, had rested in that beUef up to the repeal of the Missouri Compromise. But upon that event, I became convinced that either I had been resting in a delusion, or the institution was beiug placed on a new basis— a basis for making it perpetual, national, and universal. Subsequent events have greatly confirmed me in that belief. I believe that bill to be the beginning of a conspiracy for that purpose. So believing, I have since then considered that ques tion a paramount one. So beUeving, I think the public mind will never rest tUl the power of Congress to restrict the spread of it shaU be again acknowledged and exercised on the one hand, or on the other, all resistance be entirely crushed out. I have expressed that opinion, and I entertain it to-night. It is denied that there Is any tendency to the nationalization of slavery in these States. Mr. Brooks, of South Carolina, in one of his speeches, when they were presenting him canes, silver plate, gold pitchers and the Uke, for assaulting Senator Sumner, distinctly affirmed his opinion that when this Constitution was formed, it was the beUef of no man that slavery would last to the present day. He thus speaks of the Dred Scott decision, and Douglas' reverence for it : And I remind him of another piece of history on the question of respect for Judi cial decisions, and it Is a piece of Illinois history, belonging to a time when the large party to which Judge Douglas belonged, were displeased with a decision of the Supreme Com-t of nUnois, because they had decided that a Governor could not remove a Secretary of State. You will find the wliole story in Ford's History of minois, and I know that Judge Douglas will not deny that he was then in favor of overslaughing that decision by the mode of adding five new Judges, so as to vote down the four old ones. Not only so, but it ended iu the Judge's siUing dawn mi thai, very bench as one of the five new Judges, to break down thefowr old ones. It was in this way precisely that he got his title of Judge. Now, when the Judge tells me that men appointed. conditionaUy to sit as members of a court, wUl have to be catechis ed beforehand npon some subject, I say, " You know, Judge ; you have tried it." -When he says a court of this kind -will lose the confldence of aU men, wiU be prostituted and disgraced by such a proceeding, I say, " You know best. Judge ; yon have been through the mlU." But I cannot shake Judge Douglas' teeth loose from the Dred Scott decision. Like some obstinate animal, (I mean no disrespect,) that will hang ou when he has once got his teeth flxed, you may cut off- a leg, or you may tear away an arm, stUI he wiU not relax his hold. . And so I may point out to the Judge, and say that he is bespattered all over, from the beginning of his political life to the present time, with attacks upon judicial decisions— I may cut off- Umb after limb of his public record, and strive to wrench him from a single dictum ofthe court— yet I cannot divert him from it. He hangs to the last to the Dred Scott decision. These things show there is a purpose strong as death and eternity, for which he adheres to this decision, and for which he wiU adhere to all other decisions of the same court. A Hibernian — " Give us something beside Drid Scott." Mr. Lincoln — ^Yes ; no doubt you want to hear something that don't hurt. Judge Douglas Is going back to the era of our Revolution, and to the extent of his ability, muzzling the cannon which thunders its annual Joyous return. When he Invites any people, wlUing to have slavery, to estabUsh it, he is blowing out the moral lights around us. When he says he " cares not whether slavery is voted do-nm or voted up"— that It iss a saores" rlvht. of self-govern roo'-t ' - '- 130 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. judgment, penetrating the human soul, and eradicating the light of reason and the love of liberty in this American people. And now I wUl only say, that when by all these means and appliances. Judge Douglas shall succeed in bringing public sentiment to an exact accordance with his own views —when these vast assemb lages shall echo back aU these sentiments- when theyshaU come to repeat his -views and to avow his principles, and to say all that he says on these mighty ques tions — then it needs only the formality of the second Dred Scott decision, which he endorses in advance, to make slavery alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new. North as well as South. My friends, that ends the chapter. Judge Douglas can take his half hour. A good specimen of Judge Douglas' boldness and dogmat ism was exhibited at Freeport, August 27, 1858. Douglas persisted in calling the Republicans "Black Bepublicans" although the crowd called out and insisted again and again that he should say "'White Bepublicans" — "no epithets." It must be admitted Douglas was insulting, and the crowd re sented it. He was in the very strongest Republican district, and there were ten to one of the crowd Republican, and yet Douglas persisted in calling them "Black;" at length he said: Now, there are a great many Black Bepublicans of you who do not know this thing was done. (" -White, white, and great clamor.") I wish to remind you that while Mr. Lincoln was speaking, there was not a Democrat vulgar and blackguard enough to Interrupt him. But I know that the shoe is pinching you. I am clinching Lincoln now, and you are scared to death for the result. I have seen this thing before. I have seen men make appointments for Joint discussions, and the moment their man has been heard, try to interrupt and prevent a fair hearing of the other side. I have seen your mobs before, and deny yonr wrath. (Tremen dous applause.) My friends, do not cheer, for I need my whtxle time. I have been put to severe tests. I have stood by my principles in fair weather and in foul, in the sunshine and in the rain. I have defended the great principles of self-government here among you when Northern sentiment ran in a- torrent against me, and I have defended that same great principle when Southern senti ment came down like an avalanche upon me. I was not afraid of any test they put tome. I knew I was right — I knew my principles were sound — I knew that the people would see in the end that I had done right, and I knew that the God of Heaven would smile upon me if I was faithful in the performance of my duty. At Alton, October 16th, 1868, Lincoln said, speaking of slavery : On this subject of treating it as a wrong, and limiting Its spread, let me say a word. Has anything ever threatened the existence of this Union save and except this very institution of slavery? What is it thatwehol(l most dear amongst us ? Our own liberty and prosperity. What has ever threatened our liberty and pros perity save and except this institution of slavery ? If this is true, how do you propose to Improve the condition of things by enlarging slavery ?— by spreading Itout and making it bigger? You may have a wen or cancer upon your person and not be able to cut it out lest you bleed to death ; but surely it is no way to cure it, to engraft it and spread it over your whole body. That Is no proper way of treating what you regard a wrong. You see this peaceful way of dealing with it as a wrong— restricting the spread of it, and not allowing it to go into new countries where it has not already existed. That is the peaceful way, the old- lashioned way, the way in which the fathers themselves set us the exaraple. THE LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS DEBATE. 131 At the meeting at Freeport, August 27, 1858, occurred one of those passages which brings out the traits and charac teristics of the champions. Mr. Lincoln, after alluding to some questions propounded to him by Senator Douglas, at Ottawa, said : I now propose that I will answer any of the Interrogatories, upon condition that he will answer questions frora me, not exceeding the same number, to which I give him an opportunity to respond. The Judge remains silent; I now say that I win answer his interrogatories, whether he answer mine or not, and that after I have done so, I shall propound mine to him. I have supposed myself, since the organizatiton of the Republican party at Bloomington, in May, 1856, bound as a party man by the platforms of the party, then, and since. If, in any interrogatories which I shaU answer, I go beyond the scope of what is within these platforms, it will be perceived that no one is responsible but myself. Having said thus much, I will take up the Judge's interrogatories, as I flnd them printed in the Chicago Times, and answer them seriatim. In order that there may be no mistake about it, I have copied the interrogatories in writing, and also my answers to thera. The flrst one of these interrogatories is In these words : Question 1.—I desire to know whether Lincoln to-day stands, as he did in 1854, In fiivor of the unconditional repeal of the Fugitive Slave Law ? Anstoer. — I do not now, nor ever did, stand in favor of the unconditional repeal of the Fugitive Slave Law. Q.i. — I desire hira to answer whether he stands pledged to-day, as he did In 1854, against the admission of any more slave States into the Union, even if the people want them ? A. — I do not now, nor ever did, stand pledged against the admission of any more slave States into the Union. Q. s.—I want to know, whether he stands pledged against the admission of a new State into the Union, with such a Constitution as the people of that State may see flt to make? A. — I do not stand pledged against the admission of a new State Into the Union, ¦with such a Constitution as the people of that State may see flt to make. C. i.— Iwant to know whether he stands to-day pledged to the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia ? A.— I do not stand to-day pledged to the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia. Q. 5.— I desire him to answer whether he stands pledged to the prohibition of the slave trade between the difl'erent States 7 A.— I do not stand pledged to the prohibition of the slave trade between the difi'erent States. Q. «.— I desire to know whether he stands pledged to prohibit slavery in all the Territories of the United States, North as weU as South of tlie Missouri Compromise line? ^.— I am impliedly, if not expressly, pledged to a belief in the right and duty of Congress to prohibit slavery In all the United States' Territories. Q. 7.— I desire him to answer, whether he is opposed to -the acquisition of any new territory, unless slavery is flrst prohibited therein ? ..1.— I am not generally opposed to honest acquisition of territory; and, in any given case, I would or would not oppose such acquisition, according as I might think such acquisition would or would not aggravate the slavery question among ourselves. Now my friends, it wUl be perceived upon an examination of these questions and answers, that so fiir, I have only answered that I was not pledged to this, that, or the other. 182 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. The Judge has not framed his Interrogatories to ask me anything more than this, and I have answered in strict accordance with the interrogatories- aud have answered truly, that I am not pledged at all upon any of the points to which I have answered. But I am not disposed to hang upon the exact form of his interroga tory. I am rather disposed to take up, at least sorae of these questions, and state what I really think upon them. The fourth one is in regard to the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia. In relation to that, I have my mind very distinctly made up. I should be very glad to see slavery abolished in the District of Columbia. I believe that Congress possesses the constitutional power to aboUsh it. Yet, as a member of Congress, I should not, with my present views, be in favor of endeavoring to abolish slavery In the District of Columbia, unless it should be npon these conditions : First, That the abolition should be gradual ; Second, That It should be on a vote of the majority of qualifled voters in the District ; and Third, That compensation should be made to unwilUng owners. With these three conditions, I confess I wonld be exceed ingly glad to see Congress abolish slavery in the District of Columhia, and, in the language of Henry Clay, " sweep from our Capital that foul blot upon our nation." 1 now proceed to propound to the Judge the interrogatories, so far as I have framed them. I will bring forward a new instalment when I get them ready. I wlU bring now only four. The first one is — 1. If the people of Kansas shaU, by means entirely unobjectionable in all other respects, adopt a State Constitution and ask admission into the Union under it before they have the requisite number of inhabitants, according to the English hiU— some ninety-three thousand— wiU you vote to admit them? 2. Can the people of a Uuited States Territory, in any lawful way, against the wish of any citizen of the United States, exclude slavery from Its limits prior to the formation of a State Constitution ? S. If the Supreme Court of the United States shall decide that States cannot exclude slavery from their limits, are you in favor of acquiescing in, adopting and following such decision as a rule of political action? 4. Are you in favor of acquiring additional territory, In disregard of how such •acquisition may afl'ect the nation on the slavery question? It will be observed that the answers of Mr. Lincoln are full, fair and candid, and it is just to state, that these answers were not satisfactory to the radical anti-slavery men whom he addressed, and he knew they would not be. To the first question, Mr. Douglas said : In reference to Kansas, it Is my opinion that, as she has population enough to constitute a slave State, she has people enough for a free State. I hold it to be a sacred rule of universal application, to require a Territory to contain the requisite population for a member of Congress, before it is admitted as a State into the Union ! To the second question, Douglas replied : It matters not what way the Supreme Court may hereafter decide, as to the abstract question whether slavery may or may not go into a Territory under the Constitution, the people have the lawful means to Introduce It, or exclude it as they please, for the reason that slavery cannot exist a day, or au hour, anywhere, unless it Is supported by local police regulations. Those police regulations can only be established by the local legislature, and if the people are opposed to slavei-y, they win elect representatives to that body, who will, by unfriendly legislation, effect ually prevent the Introduction of it Into their midst. If, on the contrary, they are THE LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS DEBATE. 133 fbr It, their legislation -wlU favor Its extension. Hence, no matter what the deci sion of the Supreme Court may be on that abstract question, still the right of the people to make a slave Territory or a teee Territory Is perfect and complete under the Nebraska biU. It was in regard to this question that a friend of Mr. Lin coln said : " If Douglas answers in such a way, as to give practical force and effect to the 'Dred Scott' decision, he in evitably loses the battle, but he will therefore reply, by de claring the decision an abstract proposition ; he will adhere to his doctrine of squatter sovereignty, and declare that a territory may exclude slavery." "If he does that," said Mr. Lincoln, "he can never be President." "But," said the friend, " he may be Senator." "Perhaps," replied Lincoln, "but I am after larger game; the battle of 1860 is worth a hundred of this." It is not known positively whether Mr. Lincoln then looked forward to the possibility of his being a candidate for the Presidency; it is not improbable that byhis rare sagacity, and knowledge of public sentiment he already saw, in the rivalry of prominent leaders, his own nomination. However this may have been, he believed that the elevation of Douglas to the Executive chair, with his avowed sentiments, would be dan gerous to liberty, and sought by every legitimate means to ' damage his prospects. To the third question, Mr. Douglas said : The third question which Mr. Lincoln presented Is, if the Supreme Court of the United States shaU decide that a State of this Union cannot exclude slavery from its own limits, wiU I submit to It 7 I am amazed that Lincoln should ask such a question. He casts au iraputation upon the Supreme Court of the United States by suppos ing that they would violate the Constitution of the United States. I teU him that such a thing is not possible. It would be an act of moral treason that no man ou the bench could ever descend to. Mr. Lincoln, himself, would never, in his partisan feelings, so lax forget what was right, as to be guilty of such an act. This, however, from Mr. Douglas, was an evasion, not an answer. To the fourth question, whether he "was in favor of ac quiring additional territory in disregard as to how such acquisition may affect the slavery question," he replied : with our natural Increase, gro-wing with a rapidity unkno-sra in any other part of the globe, with the tide of emigration that is fleeing from despotism lu the old world, to seek refuge In onr own, there Is a constant torrent pouring into this 134 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. country that requires more land— more territory upon which to settle, and just as fiist as our interests and our destiny require additional territory In tbe North, in the South, or on the Islands of the Ocean, I am for It, and when we acquire it, wiU leave the people, according to the Nebraska blU, free to do as they please on the subject of slavery, and every other question. It was impossible to reconcile Douglas' position at Free- port, that slavery could be rightfully excluded from a Terri tory by legislation, and the "Dred Scott" decision, which decided that a slaveholder had a legal right to take his slaves into all the territories. Mr. Lincoln exposed this in one of his terse, clear sen tences, when he said " it was declaring that a thing may be laivfully driven away from a place, where it has a lawful right to go." These debates, and the debaters, have passed into history. The world has pronounced Mr. Lincoln the victor, but it should be remembered, in justice to Douglas, that Lincoln spoke for liberty and against the extension of slavery ; he was the organ of a new and vigorous party, and he knew he was right. Douglas was a candidate for the Presidency as well as Senator, and must keep one eye on the slaveholders, and the other on the citizens of Illinois. This hampered and embarrassed him, yet he made a brilliant canvass. An immense vote was cast — for Mr. Lincoln, 126,084; for Mr. Douglas, 121,940; and 5,091 were given for the Bu chanan ticket, which was run to defeat Douglas. Owing to the fact that several Democratic senators held over in districts which gave Republican majorities, and the inequality of the apportionment, it ha-dng been made on the basis of the population of 1850, Mr. Douglas was reelected. These debates were published at the time in the leading newspapers throughout the Union. The manly bearing, the vigorous logic, the straight-forward honesty and earnest sin cerity, as well as the intellectual power manifested by Mr. Lincoln in these discussions, made a deep impression upon the people. So well satisfied was the Republican party with the efforts of its champion, that these debates, including the speeches of Douglas and Lincoln, were published, without alteration, as a campaign document, and scattered everywhere throughout the Union. LINCOLN'S SPEECH AT COLUMBUS. 135 At the close of the canvass, Mr. Lincoli resumed the practice of his profession. His fame as a lawyer and a statesman had extended throughout the West, and he was called by professional engagements, not only into every part of Illinois, but into Indiana, Wisconsin, Missouri and Ohio. In 1859, he visited Kansas, and the grateful people of that young State received him as one who had eloquently plead their cause. In the autumn of 1859, Douglas visited and stumped Ohio. The fame of Lincoln had extended there, and he was sent for to come to that State and reply. He went, and spoke at Columbus and Cincinnati. A few extracts are given from his speech at Columbus : The American people, on the flrst day of January, 1864, found the African slave trade prohibited by a law of Congress. In a majority of the States of this Union, they found African slavery, or any other sort of slavery, prohibited by State Constitutions. They also found a law existing, supposed to be valid, by which slavery was excluded from almost all the territory the United States then owned. This was the condition of the country, with reference to the institution of slavery, on the first of January, 1854. A few days after that, a biU was introduced into Congress, which ran through its regular course In the two branches of the National Legislature, and finally passed into a law in the month of May, by which the act of Congress prohibiting slavery from going into the Territories of the United States was repealed. In connection with the law Itself, and, in fact, in the terms of the law, the then existing prohibition was not only repealed, but there was a declaration qf a purpose on the part of Congress never thereafter to exercise any power that they might have, real or supposed, to prohibit the extension or spread of slavery. This was a very great change ; for the law thus repealed was of raore than thirty years' standing. FpUowing rapidly upon the heels of this action of Congress, a decision of the Supreme Court Is made, by which it is declared that Congress, if It desires to prohibit the spread of slavery into the Territories, has no Constitutional power to do so. Not only so, but that decision lays down principles which, if pushed to their logical conclusion — I say pushed to their logical conclu sion—would decide that the Constitutions of free States, forbidding slavery, are themselves unconstitutional. Mark me, I do not say the Judge said this, and let no man say I affirm the Judge used these words ; but I only say it is my opinion that what he did say, if pressed to its logical conclusion, wUl inevitably result thus. Looking at these things, the Republican party, as I understand its principles and policy, believe that there is great danger of the institution of slav.pry being spread out and extended, until it is ultimately made alike la-wf ul in all the States of this Union; so beUeving, to prevent that incidental and ultimate consumma tion, is the original and chief purpose of the RepubUcan organization. I say chief purpose of the Republican organization ; for it is certainly true that if the National House shall fall into the hands of the Republicans, they wUl have to attend to aU Ae other matters of National House-keeping, as well as this. Of the Ordinance of 1787, he said : Not only did that Ordinance prevail, but it was constantly looked to whenever a rtep was taken by a new Territory to become a State. Congress always turned their attention to It, and in all their movements upon that subject, they traced 136 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. their course by that Ordinance of '87. When they admitted new States, they ad vertised thera of this Ordinance as a part of the legislation of the country. They did so because they had traced the ordinance of '87 throughout the history of this country. Begin with the men of the Revolution, and go down for sixty entire years, and until the last scrap of that Territory comes into the Union in the form of the State of Wisconsin, everything was made to conform with the Ordinance of '87, excluding slavery from that vast extent of country. At Cincinnati, Lincoln addressed himself to Kentuckians among others. He said : It has occurred to me here to-night, thatif I ever do shoot over the Hue at the people ou the other side of the line into a slave State, and purpose to do so, keep ing my skin safe, that I have now about the best chance I shaU ever have. I should not wonder that there are some Kentuckians about this audience ; we are close to Kentucky; aud whether that be so or not, we are on elevated ground, and by speaking distinctly, I should not wonder if some of the Kentuckians would hear me on the other side of the river. For that reason I propose to address a portion of what I have to say to the Kentuckians. I say, then. In the first place, to the Kentuckians, that I am what they call, as I understand it, a " Black RepubUcan." I think slavery is wrong, morally andpoUt- loaUy. I desire that it should be no further spread in these United States, and I should not object if it should gradually terminate in the whole Union. While I say this for myself, I say to you Kentuckians, that I understand you difl-er radi caUy with me upon this proposition ; that you believe slavery is a good thing ; that slavery is right ; that it ought to be extended and perpetuated in this Union. Now, there being this broad difference between us, I do not pretend in addressing myself to you Kentuckians, to attempt proselyting you ; that would be a vain effort. I do not enter upon it. I only propose to try to show you that you ought to nominate for the next Presidency, at Charleston, my distinguished friend. Judge Douglas. In all that there is a difference between you and him, I Understand he is sincerely for you, and more -wisely for you, than you are for yourselves. It is my opinion that it is for you to take him or be defeated ; and that if you do take him you may be beaten. You will surely be beaten if you do not take him. We, theHepublicans and others, forming the opposition of the country, intend to " stand by our guns," to be patient and firm, and In the long run to beat you whether you take him or not. We know that before we fairly beat you, we have to beat you both together. We know that you are aU of a " feather," and that we have to beat you altogether, and we expect to do it. We don't Intend to be very impatient about it. We mean to be as deliberate and calm about it as it is possi ble to be, but as firm and resolved as it is possible for raen to be. When we do. as we say, beat you, you perhaps want to know what we will do with you. I win tell you, so far as I ara authorized to speak for the opposition, what we mean to do with you. We mean to treat you, as near as we possibly can, as Washington, JeflTersou, and Madison, treated you. We mean to leave you alone, and in no way to interfere with your Institution; to abide by all and every compromise of the Constitution, and, in a word, coming back to the original proposition, to treat you, so far as degenerated men (If we have degenerated,) may, according to the examples of those noble fathers —Washington, Jefferson, and Madison. We mean to remem ber that you are as good as we; that there is no difference between us other than the difference of circumstances. We mean to recognize and bear in mind always that you have as good hearts In your bosoms as other people, or as we claim to have, and treat you accordingly. We mean to marry your girls when we have a chance— the white ones I mean, and I have the honor to inform you that I once did have a chance In that way. I have told you what we mean to do. I want to know, now when that thing takes place, what you mean to do. I often hear it Intimated that you mean to di vide the Union whenever a republican or anything like it. Is elected President of the United States. (A voice— "That is so.") "That isSo,"one of themsays- I CINCINNATI SPEECH. 137 wonder if he Is a Kentuckian? (A voice — " He is a Douglas man.") Well, then, I want to know what you are going to do with vour half of it? Aro you going to spUt the Ohio down through, and push yonr half off a piece? Or are you going to keep it right alongside of us outrageous fellows? Or are you going to build up a wall some way between yom- country and ours, by which that movable property of yours can't come over here any more, to the danger>of your losing it? Do you think you can better yourselves on that subject, by leaving us here under no obU gation whatever to return those specimens of your movable property that come hither? You have divided the Union because we would not do right with you, as you think, upon that subject; when we cease to be under obligations to do any thing for you, how much better ofl- do you think you will be 7 WUl you make war upon ns and kUl us all? "Why, gentlemen, 1 think you are as gallant and as brave men as live ; that you can fight as bravely iu a good cause, man for man, as any other people living; that you have shown yourselves capable of this upon various occasions ; but man for man, you are not better than we are, and there are not so many of you as there are of us. You wiU never make much of a hand at whipping us. If we were fewer In nurabers than you, I think that yon could whip us ; if we were equal it would likely be a drawn battle ; but being inferior j,ji nurabers, you wlU make nothing by attempting to master us. The most elaborate and carefully prepared speech, ever made by Mr. Lincoln, was that delivered by him at the Cooper Institute, in the city of New York, on Tuesday evening, February 29th, 1860. This was Mr. Lincoln's first appearance in that city. The large hall was crowded to hear this Western statesman, then chiefly kno-wn as the successful competitor of Douglas. Bryant, the poet, presided; if any came to hear noisy declamation or verbiage, they must have been disappointed. There is not a more learned, exhaustive, logical speech in political literature. It has not a superfluous word. He took for the text of his speech, these words of Senator Douglas, uttered at Columbus, Ohio, the previous autumn. " Our fathers when they framed the Govemment under which we Uve, understood this question just as well, and even better than we do now." Conceding that this was true, Mr. Lincoln proceeded to enquire, " what was the understanding those fathers had of the mestion mentioned?" (Slavery.) He first answers, who were " our fathers who framed ihe Government." He snowed that the thirty-nine men who framed the Constitution were " our fathers," " What is the question which these fathers understood just as well, if not better than we do now?" 13.8 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Itis this: "Does the Constitution forbid our Federal Government to control as to slavery in our Federal territories?" He then went into a full historical argument on the subject, presenting every recorded act of the Fathers upon the ques tion. His argument demonstrating the right of Congress to prohibit slavery in the territories, never has been, and never can be answered. He closed this great speech, which made a profound im pression upon the thoughtful men of New York, with these memorable words. " Let us have faith ihat right makes might, and in that faith let us to the end, dare to do our duty, as we understand it," This effort was so dignified in manner, and style, it exhib ited such logic, and learning, and was in every way so dif ferent from what was expected, that the orator from the prairies awoke the next morning to find himself famous. This speech was very widely circulated and read, and pre pared the minds of the people for his nomination for the Presidency. As the Presidential election of 1860, approached, Mr. Lin coln's name was more and more frequently mentioned in connection with that position. The prominent candidates, however, continued to be Senators Seward and Cameron, and Governor Chase. Mr. Lincoln, outside of Illinois, was regarded only as a possible compramise candidate. On the loth of May, 1860, a Republican State Convention was held at Decatur, in Macon county, Illinois, to nomin ate State officers, and appoint delegates to the National Presidential Convention, which was to meet in Chicago, in June. As Mr. Lincoln entered the hall where the convention was in session, he was received with such marked demonstration as left no doubt, about his being the choice of Illinois, for the Presidency. Soon after he was seated, General Oglesby, announced that an old democrat of Macon county, desired to make a contribution to the convention. Immediately,some farmers brought into the hall two old fence rails, bearing the inscription, "Abraham Lincoln, ihe rail candidate for the Presidency in 1860. Two rails from a lot THE RAIL SPLITTER OF ILLINOIS. 139 of 3,000, made in 1830, by Thomas Hanks and Abe Lincoln, whose father was ilie flrst pioneer of Macon county." The effect of this cannot be described. For fifteen minutes, cheers upon cheers went up from the crowd. Lincoln was called to the stand, but his rising was the signal for renewed cheering, and this continued until the audience had exhausted itself, and then Mr. Lincoln gave a history ofthese two rails, and of his Hfe in Macon county. He told the story of his labor in helping to build his father's log cabin, and fencing in a field of corn. This dramatic scene, was not planned by politicians, but was the spontaneous action of the old pioneers. The effect it had upon the people, satisfied all present, that it was a waste of words to talk in Illinois, of any other man than Abraham Lincoln, for President. No public man had less of the demagogue, than Mr. Lin coln. He never mentioned his humble life, or his manual labor, for the purpose of getting votes. He knew perfectly well, that it did not follow because a man could split rails, that he would make a good statesman or President. So far from having any feeling of this kind, he realized painfully, the defects of his education, and did his utmost to supply his deficiencies. When told that the people were talking of making him President, he said, "they ought to select some one who knows more than I do." But -while he did not think any more of himself, because he had in early life, split rails, he had too much real dignity to lose any self respect on that account. OHAPTEE YI. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 1860 — ELECTION OF LINCOLN, AND CULMINATION OF THE CONSPIRACY TO DISSOLVE THE UNION. The Charleston Convention — Douglas — Secessionists Break UP THE Convention — Adjourn to Baltimore — and Rich mond — Douglas — and Breckinridge Nominated — "Ameri cans" Nominate Bell and Everett — The Chicago Conven tion — The Wig-Wam — Seward — Lincoln — The Nomination — The Canvass — The " Wide-Awakes " — Position of Parties on the Slavery Question — Lincoln Elected — Conspiracy to Dissolve the Union — Preparations op the Conspirators — The North Disarmed. PRIOR to the meeting of the Democratic National Con vention, which met at Charleston, South Carolina, in April, 1860, it was ob-^ous that a storm was gathering which threatened the rupture of that old and powerful organization. Douglas was the popular candidate for President in the free States, and had many strong personal friends in the slave States. But the ultra slaveholders as a class, were bitterly hostile to him on account of his course on the Lecompton question. They determined to break up the convention rather than permit his nomination. Hitherto in conventions, the North had yielded to the more positive and determined leaders among the slaveholders, and many supposed the friends of Douglas would yield, and that a nomination of some negative man would be forced upon the convention upon whom the party would harmonize. But two powei-fal elements prevented this. The friends of Douglas who had been inspired by him with a will as determined as that of his enemies, having a majority, resolved that their leader should not be sacrificed as Van 140 CHARLESTON CONVENTION. 141 Buren, Benton, and other leaders had been, who had offended the slaveholders. • The other element was composed of the secessionists and traitors, who did not desire Union, but were determined to push matters to extremes, to divide the democratic party, thereby secure the success of the republican party, and then to make that success the pretext for secession. A convention composed of these elements with such purposes, could not harmonize. The committee upon resolutions to which the subject ofthe platform was referred, made three reports. The majority reported resolutions declaring, among other things, that " Congress had no power to abolish or prohibit slavery in the territories; nor had the territorial Legislature any power to abolish or prohibit slavery in the territories; * * * nor to impafr or destroy the right of property in slaves by any legislation whatever." This was intended as a direct repudiation pf Mr. Douglas' doctrine of popular sovereignty, and his friends knew that they might as well give up the canvass at the start, as to go before the people on this platform. A minority of the com mittee, but representing a decided majority of the electoral votes, reported resolutions re-affirming the old platform adopted at Cincinnati, in 1856; with some additional resolu tions designed to conciliate the slave States, and declaring that "inasmuch as there were differences of opinion in the democratic party as to the powers of a territorial Legis lature, and as to the powers and duties of Congress under the Constitution, over the institution of slavery in the territories, the democratic party would abide by the decrees of the Supreme Court, on questions of Constitutional law." When it is remembered that the Dred Scott decision had been pronounced, giving to the slaveholders all that they claimed, one would suppose that this resolution would have been deemed satisfactory. And it would have been, if the slave holders had really desired harmony, but a majority of them meant disunion. Benjamin F. Butler, of Massachusetts, one of the committee, reported the Cincinnati platform without addition. After voting down Mr. Butler's proposition, the 142 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHRQ-W OF SLAVERY. convention adopted the minority report, which contained the Ciiicinnati platform with the additions. Thereupon, L. P. Walker, subsequently the rebel Secretary of War, presented the protest of the delegates from Alabama, and those delegates withdrew from the convention. Among these delegates was William L. Yancey, long be fore a notorious secessionist. The delegates from Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, South Carolina, Florida, and Arkansas, Georgia, and Delaware, thereupon also withdrew. The con vention thereupon resolved that it should require two-thirds of a full convention to nominate, and then, after balloting several times, on each of which ballots Mr. Douglas had a large, but not, under the rule, a two-thirds majority, the convention adjourned to meet at Baltimore, on the 18th of June. The seceding delegates adjourned to meet at Richmond, on the second Monday in June. The Baltimore convention met and nominated Stephen A. Douglas for President, and Benjamin Fitzpatrick, of Ala bama, for Vice President, but on his declining, Herschel V. Johnson, of Georgia, was substituted. The seceders' convention at Richmond, adopting the reso lutions of the majority ofthe committee, nominated John C. Breckinridge, of Kentucky, for President, and Colonel Joseph Lane, of Oregon, for Vice President. The disruption of the democratic party was hailed with delight by the infatuated people of Charleston, and other parts of the rebel States, as the prelude to the breaking up of the Union. The Constitutional Union (American) party nominated John Bell, for President, and Edward Everett, for Vice President. On the 16th of May, 1860, the Republican Convention met at Chicago, to nominate candidates for President and Vice President. An immense building called the " Wigwam," capable of holding many thousands of people, had been specially erected for the meeting. Full, and eager, and en thusiastic delegations were there from all the free States, and representatives were present from Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri, and Virginia, and some scattering CHICAGO CONVENTION. 143 representatives from some of the other slave States ; but the Gulf States were not represented. Indeed, few of the slave States were fully and perfectly represented. On motion of Governor Morgan, Chairman of the National Executive Com mittee, David Wilmot, author of the Wimot Proviso, was made temporary Chairman, and George Ashmun, of Massachusetts, permanent President. Theirplatform of principles was adopted without difficulty. They resolved to maintain the principles of the Declaration of Independence, declared their fidelity to the Union; their abhorrence of all schemes of disunion ; denounced all who threatened disunion as an avowal of contemplated treason, which it was the duty of the people sternly to rebuke and forever silence. The convention also resolved: "that the new dogma that the Constitution carried slavery into all the territories, was a dangerous political heresy, revolutionary in tendency, and subversive of the peace and harmony of the country; that the normal condition of all the territories is that of freedom; that neither Congress, the territorial Legislature, nor any individual could give legal existence to slavery; that Kansas ought to be immediately admitted as a free State; that the opening of the slave trade would be a crime against human ity." They declared also in favor of a homestead law. Har bor and River improvements, and the Pacific Railroad. The leading candidates for the nomination for President, were Wilham H. Seward, of New York, Abraham Lincoln, of Illinois, Salmon P. Chase, of Ohio, Simon Cameron, of Pennsylvania, and Edward Bates, of Missouri ; but it early became apparent that the contest was between Seward, and Lincoln. Mr. Seward -had been for many years, a leading statesman; Governor of New York, and long its most dis tinguished Senator; he had brought to the discussions ofthe great issue between liberty and slavery, a philosophic mind, broad and catholic views, great sagacity, and an elevated love of liberty and humanity. Few, if any, had done more to enlighten, create, and consolidate public opinion in the free States. His position had been far more conspicuous than that of Mr. Lincoln. Hence he had been supposed to be 144 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLA^VERY. more in the way of rivals, and had become the object of more bitter personal and political hostility than Mr. Lincoln. The Illinois candidate was principally known outside of the North west, as the competitor of Douglas. Yet the sobriquet of "honest old Abe," "the rail-splitter of Illinois," had ex tended throughout the free States; he had no enemies, and was the second choice of nearly all the delegates of which he was not the first choice. He was supposed by the shrewd politicians, to have, and he did possess, those qualities which make an available candidate. Although a resident of the State, he did not attend the convention, but was quietly at his home in Springfield. Few men of that convention realized, or had the faintest foreshadowings of the terrible ordeal of civil war, which was before the candidate which they should nominate and the people elect. Yet there seems to have been a peculiar pro priety in Mr. Lincoln's nomination; and there was here illustrated, that instinctive sagacity, or more truly, providen- vidential guidance, which directs a people in a critical emerg ency, to act wisely. Looking back, we now see how -wise the selection. The Union was to be assailed ; Lincoln was from the National N orth- west, which would never surrender its great communications with the ocean, by the Mississippi, or the East. The great principles of the Declaration of Independence were to be assailed by vast armies; his political platform had ever been that Declaration. Aristocratic power, with the sympathy of the Kings and nobility of Europe, was to make a gigantic effort to crush liberty and democracy; it was fit that the great champion of liberty, of a government " of the people, for the people, by the people," should be a man born on the wild prairie, nur tured in the rude log cabin, and reared amidst the hardships and struggles of humble life. On the first ballot, Mr. Seward received 173J votes to 102 for Lincoln, the others being divided on Messrs. Cameron, Chase, Bates, and others. On the second, Mr. Seward re ceived 184 votes to 181 for Mr. Lincoln. On the third, Mr. LINCOLN'S NOMINATION. 145 Lincoln received a majority, and his nomination was then made unanimous.* While the balloting was in progress, * Did Lincoln anticipate this nomination? In March 1860, Mr. Lincoln spent several days at Chicago, engaged in the United States Court in the trial of the case of Johnson v. Jones, During the trial. Judge Drum mond, Mr. Lincoln, and the members of the bar engaged in the case, were dining together, at the table of one of the counsel, who was a warm personal and political friend of Mr. Lincoln. Others of the counsel present were equally warm friends of Judge Douglas, who was then the most prominent candidate tor the Presidency before the people. ¦When the cloth was removed the host said " gentlemen, please fill your glasses for a toast, which, differing as we do politically, I ara sure all present will heartily respond to." "May Illinois furnish ihe next President!" The friends of Douglas drank to him, and the rest of us to Lincoln. So far as the author knows, the flrst nomination in any newspaper of Mr. Lincoln for the Presidency was made on the Sth day of October 1859, by the Aurora Beacon, published at Aurora, Kane county, Illinois, and then ably edited by John 'W. Bay, Esq. In the Beacon for October 6th, 1859, under the caption of " Th,e calmness of the re publicans," Mr. Lincoln was named. Incidentally, ainong some half dozen others, as the possible man for their candidate for 1859. In the Issue of the same paper of November 10th, 1859, the nomination took defi nite shape under the caption, " TJiey say Old Abe is the man." Among other passages occur the foUoHdng, iu that article : " Illinois has rather waited for others to move, than to move herself, because her man is one of her own citizens, and she trusted that the people of other Sta tes, would do, with a/ better grace, what she is particularly desirous of having done. She waits to second, what she would be the first to move in, were the great man a citizen of any other State. * * It is a settled question we believe that the West must have the next President, never having had a man in the office, but one month. It is also settled, that there must be a candidate who can carry the most doubtful States. Now Illinois, if any, is one of those states. No one doubts that Douglas can poU the largest vote here, of any raan, unless It be Abe LiNOOiiN, and no one doubts that what Lincoln did under all the disadvantages, of 1858, he could do easily under the better auspices of 1860. And it would be peculiarly a glory. If on the very ground where Lincoln was cheated out of his election, (as Senator) there he should be run again, and should have the glory of defeating Douglas, should he be the opponent. He wiU thus fight neither with great nor small, but only with the King of the democratic host. Lincoln has every element of popularity and success, and he has one which will give him peculiar prominence over Douglas, and that is his integrity to the great principles which this State, and all the free States are determined shall cut a figure in the next election. Freedom v. Slavery. We are in no hurry to bring out Mr. Lincoln. He will be thought of in time by all that will need him, if he be the man. But if he shaU become the nominnee of the republi can hosts, we shaU count it a Joy to hoist his name at our ¦mast head, and to hang the banner on the outer wall of our city and country." The same paper in its issue of December I5th 1859, under the caption, " TTto is the strongest man?". after discussing the claims of Mr. Lincoln at length as against Mr. Seward and others, concludes with these truthful and prophetic words: "And we cannot help thinking how, like a shadow of a great rock in a weary land, such a President will seem, as Abraham Lincoln will make. He -will, in his principles and measures, o'er Buchanan, like an eagle soar. Disunion will flnd hun as South Carolina found old Jackson. Tlie slave trade will find him a Wllberforce The army wUl be used for defence, not ofl-ence. With Lincoln for President, and Cameron, or Reed, or even Thad. Stevens as Vice President, the ticket would sweep the 'States, as Von Tromp the seas. This Is he whom we consider the strongest man, and for whom we would avas so conscious of his guilt, that he dared not, as a rebel general, surrender to General Grant), was Secretary of War. It was important to the Confederates that the slave States should be THE NORTH DISARMED. 155 armed, and the free States disarmed; and that the little reg ular army of the United States should be sent so far away as not to be in reach of the government until the conspiracy had accomplished the revolution they had designed. Hence, Floyd, as Secretary of War, ordered 115,000 muskets, from the Springfield and Watervliet manufactories and arsenals, to be sent to the arsenals in the slave States. He also sent a vast number of cannon, mortars, ammunition and munitions of war tc the South. He took care, not only that Southern arsenals should be stocked with vast supplies of arms and other munitions of war, but that the garrisons of Southern forts and arsenals should be so weakened that no effectual resistance could be made to the local militia's seizing them. The valuable Arsenal of Fayetteville, North Carolina, was garrisoned by one company of troops; Fort Moultrie, in Charleston harbor, by eighty men; Key-West, the key to the Gulf of Mexico, by one company; while the United States Mint at New Orleans, the Custom Houses at New Or leans, Charleston, Mobile, and Savannah, were entirely unguarded. Such were the bold and unscrupulous acts of the conspira tors. It was the intention of some of them to prevent the inauguration of Lincoln ; to prepare the way to surrender 'the capitol and archives to the rebels; and this purpose would have been accomplished, but for the vigilant eye of the venerable hero, General Scott. CHAPTEE YII. PROGRESS OF THE CONSPIRACY— FROM THE ELECTION OF LINCOLN TO HIS ARRIVAL AT WASHINGTON, FEBRUARY 1861. The Conspiracy Extending — Administration of Buchanan — General Scott — G-eneral Cass — Action op Congress in Winter op 1860-61 — Committee op Thirty-Three — Peace Convention — Eeport op Adams — Secret Meetings op Con spirators AT THE Capitol — Seven States Secede, and Or ganize A Provisional Government — Jefferson Davis — Re bellion Without Excuse — Slavery, the Corner-Stone op the Confederacy — Counting Electoral Votes by Congress — Lincoln Leaves Springpield por Washington — His Journey — Assassination Plot — His Arrival. WHILE the organization and proportions of this widely extended conspiracy were boldly and defiantly exhib ited, and daily becoming more and more formidable, the at tention of the whole country was fixed upon President Buchanan. Would he, like Jackson in 1832, declare " by the Eternal, the Union shall be preserved ! " Would he pre pare to meet force by force ? Would he send the veteran Scott to South Carolina, and elsewhere, to protect National property, execute the laws, and maintain national suprema cy? Scott had pointed out the danger, and urged and im plored that vigorous means might be taken to maintain the national authority. Buchanan, either traitorously, or through weakness, which, in its results, was equivalent to treason, took no steps to main tain the Union, but was wax, or clay, in the hands of Messrs. Davis, Howell Cobb, Thompson, Floyd, and their associates. He even went so far as to promise the Confederates that no reenforcements should be sent to the garrisons in Southern 156 TREASON IN THE CABINET OF BUCHANAN. 157 forts. .With this assurance, the leaders of the conspiracy went forward in their guilty preparations with impunity. It is probable that, with a loyal, energetic President like Jack son, -with the aid of -Scott, the conspiracy might have been crushed in its inception. There was, in the border States, a clear majority for the Union, and, in the gulf States, a considerable portion of the people were opposed to secession ; but, receiving no aid, no encouragement, and no protection from the executive or his subordinates; seeing the cabinet, and nearly all Federal office-holders in the slave States actively promoting disunion, unchecked and unrebuked, and the secessionists everywhere open, bold and defiant, the Union men yielded to the threats and terror of the active, energetic, unscrupulous conspirators, and made little resistance to the current of popular excitement which was sweeping on towards civil war. The candid world will ever hold the administration of Buchanan responsible for this neglect to crush the rebellion in its beginning. Floyd, having finished the work of treason as Secretary of War, fled South, to meet the applause of the conspirators for his perfidy, and to exchange the portfolio of War Secretary of the Republic, for a commission in the rebel army. Isaac Toucey, of Connecticut, more infamous, if possible, than even Floyd, did the same for the navy that Floyd did for the army. He scattered the vessels of war beyond seas, and placed the naval force out of the reach of the government. It appears, from an official report made to Congress, that it was in the power of the Secretary of the Navy to have stationed a naval force, adequate to the protection of all the rights and property of the government, at exposed points; but instead of doing so, the Secretary sent the vessels of war abroad, without justification or excuse. A committee of Congress also found him guilty of accepting resignations of officers of the navy who were in arms against their flag, and of others who sought thus to dispose of their com missions under the United States, to accept service from its enemy.* ~*See report of Secretary of Navy, July, 1861 and report of Naval Committee. 158 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Thus the right arm of the government was despoiled of its weapons — the army and navy. The treasury was plun dered, and the national credit shaken, for the benefit, and in aid of the purposes of treason. But for the resolute energy of General Scott, the purpose of the conspirators' to prevent the inauguration of Lincoln, and to obtain possession of the capitol and its archives, would have succeeded. As early as October, 1860, General Scott warned President Buchanan of the danger that the conspirators would seize Forts Jackson and St. Phillip, guarding the entrance to the Mississippi,' (which Admiral Farragut, subsequently, sd gal lantly retook), and which were then without garrison ; Forts McRea and Pickens, in Pensacola Harbor, with an inefficient garrison ; Fort Pulaski, Georgia, without a garrison ; Forts Moultrie and Sumpter, Charleston, the latter without a garri son, and the former with only eighty men ; Fortress Monroe without a sufficient garrison. He also recommended that all should be so garrisoned, as to render an attempt to take them by surprise, hopeless. He closed his timely and patri otic letter with the declaration that, " with the army faith ful to its allegiance, and the navy probably equally so ; and with a Federal Executive, for the next twelve months, of firm ness and moderation, there is good reason to hope that the danger from secession may be made to pass away, without one conflict of arms, one execution, or one arrest for treason." The honest old hero could not conceive that treason had en tered the very highest departments of government, and that the heads of the army and navy were, at that moment, from their oflicial desks, conspiring for the overthrow of the gov ernment. The officers of the army and navy had been, many of them, seduced from their allegiance, and were ready to desert their flag. On the 14th of December, General Cass, a patriot, resigned the office of Secretary of State, because the President refused to reeuforce the forts in the harbor of Charleston. Scott urged the Secretary of War to warn the garrisons against surprise. His warnings and importunities to garrison the forts were again repeated; but traitors in the Cabinet and dotage and weakness, approaching imbecility, or treason, in THE REBELLION DELIBERATELY PLANNED. 159 the Executive, prevented any attention being paid to his earnest and repeated applications. Time verified, and more than realized, his predictions. That which he so confidently exi.-^cted to find, and the absence of which he could scarcely conceive, fldelity io the flag in the army and navy, was, to a lamentable extent, wanting. The treachery in the Cabinet extended largely among officers born at the South, both in the army and na-vy. All the fortresses and forts named, were seized by the rebels, except Fortress Monroe. The rebellion was not the result of impulse, but, as has been previously stated, a deliberately planned movement. In October, 1856, a meeting of the governors of slave States was held at Raleigh, North Carolina, convened at the instance of Governor Wise, who afterwards proclaimed, that if Fremont had been elected, he would have marched to Washington, at the head of 20,000 men, and prevented his inauguration. Mr. Keitt, member of Congress from South Carolina, said, in the convention of his State, which adopted the ordinance of secession : " I have been engaged in this movement ever since I entered political life." Mr. Rhett said : "The secession of South Carolina is not the event of a day. It is not anything produced by Mr. Lincoln's election, or the non-enforcement of the fugitive slave law. It is a matter that has been gathering head for thirty years." The Provisional Governor of South Carolina, Mr. Perry, appointed by President Johnson, said, in a pubhc speech, in July, 1865 : We were, at the tune of secession, the most prosperous, free and happy people on the ace of the earth. The sun had never shone on a nation or empire whose fu ture was raore bright and glorious. But the public raind had, unfortunately, been prepared, in the southern States for thirty years past for an effort at disunion. The people had been induced to believe that disunion would be a great blessing, and that it m ight come without war and bloodshed ! The leading politicians, a t the South were anxiously waiting for some plausible pretext for seceding from the Union. **************** The so-called "righis of the South" were In no possible danger from Mr. Lincoln, even had he been disposed to interfere with them. There was, at that lime, a ma jority of twenty-seven in the House of Representatives, politically opposed tohim. There was a majority, in the Senate, of six against him. A majority of the Su preme Court were opposed to the principles of the Republican party. Lincoln was. therefore, in a minority in both houses of Congress, and on the bench of the Su preme Court; and a large majority of the people had supported others for the presidency. He was powerless to injure the slave Stutts. 160 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Notwithstanding the overwhelming evidence of the exist ence of a wide-spread, long planned conspiracy tp dissolve the Union, evidence which could be accumulated to almost any extent, the people of the North were slow to believe that those who threatened, were really in earnest; equally slow to believe the leaders were unappeasable, and, being them selves unwilling to resort to force, they were ready to yield almost everything to secure harmony. The conspirators, and those who were made to sympathize with alleged Southern wrongs, were misled and encouraged by the idea, too gen erally expressed by Northern democratic politicians, and the democratic press, that the South was right, and really suf fered real wrongs; and that the South had a right to se cede, and should be met by conciliation, concession and compromise. Mr. Johnson, a prominent politician of central New Tork, said, at a State convention held at Albany, on the 31st of January, 1861 : " The will of a large portion of the citizens of this State is against any armed coercion to restore the Union by ci-vil war. If Congress and our States cannot win back our southern brethren, let us, at least, part as friends." Leading democrats proclaimed : Union by compromise, or peaceable separation. Some of the conspirators were led to believe, from the ex pressions of the press and politicians, that either there would be no attempt at coercion, or, if there should be, the Democrats would be found on the side ofthe seceding States. At the opening of the second session of the Thirty-sixth Congress, President Buchanan said, in substance, that while no State had a right to secede, the Federal Government could not coerce a sovereign State. He told the conspirators they had no right to secede, but if they did, he could not prevent it. This was all they wanted. They were bold, unscrupu lous, determined men, with well defined purposes. Bucha nan urged that the Union was not to be preserved by force, but by compromise. In other words we had no government. The Union was an association, to exist as long as the States found it agreeable. The Government, according to Bucha nan, was mere moral suasion — without authority. Had he THE COMMITTEE OF THIRTY-THREE. 161 announced with dignity, decision, and power, that the Gov ernment was the majesty of authority, armed with power, and in its right hand the sword to compel obedience, he could have enforced submission, and maintained National author ity. His message greatly encouraged and emboldened the conspirators. It was referred by the House, to' a Select Committee of one from each State, of which Mr. Corwifi, of Ohio, was Chairman, to report measures of pacification. But Mr. Iverson, Senator from Georgia, expressed the animus of the conspirators, when he exclaimed : " Gentlemen talk of concession, the repeal of personal liberty bills ! Repeal them all to-morrow, and you cannot stop the revolution. There will be no war!" said he. Ben. Wade, Senator from Ohio, staunch, fearless, blunt, and honest, in the face of the conspirators aud compromisers, said : " We will prohibit slavery from invading another inch of the free soil of the United States. I will stand by this principle. We pretend to no right to interfere with your ' institution ' in your States, but we beat you on the plainest and most palpable principle ever presented to the American people, and now we tell you plainly, our candidate shall be inaugurated, and shall administer the Government." A committee of thirteen in the Senate had been raised to report measures of pacification. This committee, and Mr. Corwin's committee of thirty-three in the House, reported and discussed various propositions of compromise. Many of these propositions offered by way of concession by Northern members, were voted down by the conspirators. It was clear they did not wish compromise measures to succeed. They so conducted matters as to throw odium on the North, and consolidate and unite public sentiment at the South in favor of secession. To avert the threatening dangers, the " Peace Convention," was called at Washington. This was a convention of dele gates from neariy all the free States, and several of the slave States, to consult and see on what terms the disaffected, and traitorous, could be induced to abandon their purposes. There were, as we have seen, many at the North who believed the secession movement was only a " strike " for additional 11 162- LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. guarantees for slavery. It had become a settled custom of the slaveholders, whenever they wished to carry a point, to .threaten to dissolve the Union. They had demanded Loui siana, and it had been purchased for them; Florida, and it was obtained ; Texas, and it was annexed ; a more stringent and humiliating fugitive slave law, and it was passed; the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, and it was repealed; the Dred Scott decision, and it was decided that a negro had " no rights." Thus, they had become arrogant, because their demands, backed by threats, had been so long yielded to. Many believed that by adding new concessions, the slave power might be pacified. But, when liberal concessions were voted down by the conspirators themselves, it became evident that they had deliberately resolved to force an issue, and go out of the Union. Charles Francis Adams, from the House Committee of thirty-three, reported, " that no form of adjust ment will be satisfactory to the recusant States, which does not incorporate into the Constitution of the United States, an obligation to protect and extend slavery. On this condi tion, and on this alone, will they consent to withdraw their opposition to the recognition of the Constitutional election of the Chief Magistrate. Viewing the matter in this light, it seems unadvisable to attempt to proceed a step further in the way of offering unacceptable propositions." It was clear the conspirators had resolved on revolution. While these movements of the traitors were going on in the cotton States, and State after State was passing ordin ances of secession, the conspirations at Washington, held their secret meetings, and leading Senators and members, acting in concert with traitors in the Cabinet, so managed as to thwart all the movements of General Scott, and to paralize the action of such few faithful officers as sought to preserve the Union. • There was a meeting held at the Capital on the night of January 5th, at which Jefterson Davis, Senators Toombs, Iverson, Slidell, Benjamin, Wigfall, and other leading con spirators were present. They resolved in secret conclave to precipitate secession and disunion as soon as possible, and at the same time, that Senators and merabers of the House HAMILTON OP TEXAS. 163 should remain in their seats at the Capitol, as long as possi ble, to watch and control the action of the Executive, and thwart, and defeat any hostile Ineasure proposed. In accordance with concerted plans, some of the Senators and members, as the States they represented passed ordin ances of secession, retired from the Senate and House of Representatives. Some went forth breathing war and ven geance, others expressing deep feeling and regret. Nearly all ¦were careful to draw their pay, stationery, and documents, and their mileage home, from the treasury of the Government, they went home avowedly to overthrow. There were two honorable exceptions among the represen tatives from the Gulf States, Mr. Bouligny, representative from New Orleans, and Andrew J. Hamilton, from Texas. They remained true to the Union. On the evening of the 3d of March, 1861, when the Thirty- sixth Congress was about to expire, Hamilton, when bidding farewell to his associates said, " 1 am going home io Texas, and I shall stand by the old flag, as long as there is a shred ofit left as big as my hand." Nobly, bravely, has he redeemed that pledge. He stood by the flag through all the perils of the war, and as Provincial Governor of Texas, he has aided in the restoration of that Union to which he was ever steadfast and true. The absence of declaratory laws by Congress, had been much relied upon by Mr. Buchanan's Attorney General, Mr. Black, in his labored argument to show that the Executive had no power to coerce States. In accordance with the programme of the conspirators, South Carolina, had adopted the ordinance of secession, on the 17t.h of November, 1860; Mississippi, January 9th, 1861; Georgia, January 19th; Florida, January 10th; Alabama, January llth; Louisiana, January 25th, and Texas, February 1st.* These seven seceding States, appointed delegates to meet in convention, at Montgomery, Alabama. They met on the 4th of February, and organized a Provisional Government, ?Mcpherson's History, p. 2 and 3. 164 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. similar in many respects, to the Constitution of the United States; under which Jefferson Davis was made President, and Alexander H. Stephens, Vice President. The President of the Confederate States, was a man of culture and large experience in public affairs. Born in Ken tucky, educated at West Point, at the expense of the Govern ment he sought to overthrow, he entered public life as the follower of Calhoun. He was of an imperious temper, and of a most intense personal ambition. He favored the repu diation by the State of Mississippi, of the bonds issued by that State, and thus brought deep disgrace upon the American character. He was called to the position of Secretary of War by President Pierce, and in that position he deliberately conducted the affairs of the War Department -with a view to strengthen the slave States, preparatory to a separation, and for war, if necessary, to secure separation. As the head of the insurgents at Montgomery, he was guilty of opening the bloody tragedy of civil war, by ordering the fire upon Fort Sumpter. The character of the man may be inferred from the language he used in a speech on his way from Mississippi to Montgomery, to assume the Presidency. " We will carry the war," said he, " where it is easy to advance, where food for the sword and torch await our armies in the densely populated cities." Such was. the war this man inaugurated and carried on until his ignominious capture. How different this from the forbearing, dignified, christian spirit of magna nimity which ever characterized the language of the Cliief Magistrate of the Union during the war. Davis used the language of the iucendiary and conspirator, while Lincoln was ever the dignified and scrupulous Chief Magistrate. With him, it was always, " with malice towards none, with charity for all, -with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right," that he discharged his duty. The atrocities of the war, the treatment of prisoners, the the massacre of Negro soldiers, and the catalogue of barbari- 1ies down to the fiend-like assassination of Lincoln, were but ¦ the exhibition of the same spirit, which, on the very thresh- hold indicated the torch, and the densely populated Northern ci^es as its food. BUCHANAN'S CABINET. 165 The spirit of Davis thus announced, in the beginning of the war, was the spirit of the slaveholder, and characterized the leaders of the slaveholders rebellion. The well-meaning and ignorant masses of the people in the seceding States, were deceived. Upon the heads of their leaders and teachers is the guilt, and upon the institution which produced such men, be the infamy. The Vice President, Alexander H. Stephens, was a very different character. Intellectually an abler, and morally, a far better man, he had vigorously opposed secession, and never heartily approved it. Meanwhile, the conspirators having tied up the hands of the Executive by obtaining a promise from him not to rein force the feeble garrisons in the Southern forts, and having adroitly secured the written opinion of his Attorney General endorsed by the official declaration ofthe President, that he had no power to coerce a State, adopted the most efficient means to carry out their purposes. The President was constantly watched by the conspirators and their agents, that he might not be induced to change his mind. A portion of his cabinet and some of his political friends chafed under the course he had adopted. General Cass, as has been stated, resigned the position of Secretary of State, because he refused to reinforce Fort Moultrie, held by the gallant and faithful Major Ander son, \^ho had been assigned by Scott, to command that important position. On the 10th of December, Howell Cobb resigned his posi- sition of Secretary of the Treasury, because, as he alleged, " his duty to Georgia required it." He was succeeded first by Philip F. Thomas, a devoted Unionist, from Maryland, and afterwards by General Dix:, of New York. On the 26th of January, John B. Floyd resigned the posi tion of Secretary of War, because Buchanan would not withdraw the few troops, there were left in the National forts of South Carolina. He was succeeded by the true and loyal Joseph Holt, of Kentucky. On the 17th of December, Attorney General Black resigned the position of Attorney General, and was succeeded by Edwin M. Stanton. Stanton, Dix, and Holt, were unflinching Union 166 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. men, and did what they could to prevent the surrender ofthe Government to the conspirators. They most efficiently aided General Scott in securing the peaceful inauguration of President Lincoln. The strange spectacle was presented, that while the conspi rators were boldly, and with little disguise, hatching their schemes of breaking up the Government, in the Senate and in the House, at the War and Navy Departments, and in the very •cabinet of the Executive, no attempt was made to inter fere with, much less arrest the known, open and avowed traitors. All that the feeble man in the Executive Chair did, was to appoint a day of fasting, humiliation and prayer; and declare, that though secession was wrong, he had no power to prevent it. The conspirators labored industriously to make the revolution an accomplished fact before the inaugu ration of Mr. Lincoln. They were active in plundering the Government, securing the forts, ordinance, arms and all ma terial of war, and arming themselves, so that if Lincoln should be inaugurated, he would have no immediate means of coercion. The absence of any grievance or excuse for the rebellion, will be apparent from two or three facts. The slaveholders and their friends, had at that time, a working majority in both Houses of Congress; and they had controlled both Congress and the Executive, and dictated the policy of the Government for more than forty years. This truth is very strikingly presented by Alexander H. Stephens, the ablest among the conspirators, in a speech made on the 14th of November, 1860, when opposing secession before the Legislature of Georgia. He said : Mr. Lincoln can do nothing unless he is backed by the power of Congress. The House of Representatives is largely in majority against him. In the Senate he is powerless. There will be a majority of foul against hira. * * * " Many of us,' ' said he, " have sworn to support the Constitution. Can we, for the mere election of a man to the Presidency, and that too, in accordance with the forras of the Constitution, make a point of resistance without becoming the breakers of that same instrument ?'' The same mau afterwards, frankly and distinctly announced that slavery, the security of slavery, was the object of the revolution, and that that institution should be the " corner stone " of the Confederate Governraent. THE GLOOMY WINTER OF 1861. 167 While these various movements were going on, Lincoln remained at his home in Springfield, Illinois, a deeply anx ious, yet hopeful spectator. The greatest solicitude was man ifested North and South, to learn his views, and ascertain hia policy. In November, he visited Chicago, and expressed to his friends, the deepest concern in regard to the movements of South Carolina, and other States, threatening revolution. The impression he made upon all who approached him was, that he was direct, truthful, and sincere, with a heart full of good nature and kindness, yielding to his friends in all mat ters, except those which involved principle, but upon such questions, inflexibly firm. He expressed strong hopes, that notwithstanding the intense excitement, he might be able to quiet the storm, and restore tranquility without war. To an inquiry made to one of his intimate friends, as to what kind of a man is Lincoln ? the reply was, " He has the firmness, without the temper of Jackson." No one will ever forget the dark and threatening aspect of affairs which lowered upon the country during the winter of 1860-61. What a horrid nightmare were the long days of that winter, in which patriots could see conspirators plotting, traitors plundering the treasury, dispersing the soldiers of the Republic, and sending its armed ships abroad, and already stripping the arsenals ; the dark and awful tornado coming, and the rebels preparing to scuttle the ship of State, after hav ing plundered her of money and arms, and these very conspira tors her chief officers, and the people passengers, with no power to interfere ! How anxiously the people watched and waited, how earnestly they prayed for the 4th of March, none will ever forget. All eyes were turned to Lincoln as to the only man who could save his country from the clutches of the conspirators. That was a strange spectacle — an hour of awful suspense, the 15th of February, 1861, when the electoral votes were counted in joint session of both houses of Congress. Breck inridge, the Vice President, presided. Fears were enter tained that by some fraud or violence, the ceremony would be interrupted or not performed. But the schemes of the conspirators were not yet ripe for violence. In pursuance of 168 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the Constitution and the forms of established law, both houses of Congress met at 12 M., in the gorgeous hall ofthe House of Representatives. In such joint session, the Vice President and Speaker, sit side by side, the Vice President presiding. The Chaplain of the House, as well as the crowds of people who had thronged to the Capitol, seemed impressed with the peculiarly solemn character of the proceedings. He invoked God's blessing and protection upon the President elect, prayed for his safe arrival at the Capital, and that he might be peaceably inaugurated ; (thus exhibiting the anxiety of the public mind upon the subject.) The two most conspicuous personages present, were the Vice President, Breckinridge, and 'Douglas; both unsuccess ful candidates for the Presidency. Breckinridge received seventy-two electoral votes, and Douglas only twelve, although he was second to Lincoln only, in the popular vote. On the llth of February, Mr. Lincoln left his home at Springfield for Washington. His journey to the Capital was all the way through crowds of anxious, religious, and patriotic men, everywhere in voking upon him, the blessing, the guidance, and protection of Almighty God. How deeply he himself felt, and how oppressively he real ized the weighty responsibilities resting upon him, appears from the beautiful and touching speech he made to his im mediate friends and neighbors from the platform of the rail- car, when about to start, and bidding good-by to that home to which he was destined never again to return alive. There is not a more touching and sublime speech in our language than this. Said he : My Fribnus : No one, not in my position, can realize the sadness I feel at this parting. To this people I owe all that I am. Here I have lived more than a quar ter of a century. Here my children were born, aud here one of them lies buried. I know not how soon- 1 shall see you again. I go to assume a task more difficult than that which has devolved upon any other man since the days of Washington. He never woulii have succeeded except for the aid of Divine Providence, upon which he at all times relied. I feel that I cannot succeed without the same Divine blessing which sustained him ; and ou the same Almighty Being I place my reli ance for support. And I hope you, my friends, will all pray that I may receive that Divine assistance, without which I cannot succeed, but with which success is certain. Again, I bid you all an affectionate farewell. LINCOLN ON HIS WAY TO WASHINGTON. 16,9 The deep, religious feeling which pervades this speech, marked him to the close of his life. All through his troubles he earnestly solicited the prayers of the people, and they were his. From the time of his departure from Springfield, until he was borne back from the Capital which he had saved, — hallowed forever in the hearts of a people who6i he had delivered, and Deified by a race which he had emancipated, — he was the object of earnest prayer at the family altar, and in the house of public worship, from Maine and Minnesota to the Ohio and the mountains of Tennessee; from the great lakes to the ocean bounds of the Republic, Every loyal heart asked God's blessing upon "Honest Old Abe." As he went forth upon his mission to fill his grand destiny, and to his final martyrdom, every where the hearts of the people went out to meet him. Their feelings found expres sion in the mottoes inscribed upon the banners under \^ich he was to pass : " We will pray for you." " God bless you !" "God aid you!" "God help you to save the Republic." On one of the draped banners, which followed him to his grave in Springfield, was a motto which truthfully expressed the sentiment of the whole American People : He left us, borne up by our prayers ; He returns, embalmed In our tears. He passed through the great States of Indiana, Ohio, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, on his way to the Capital. From the date of the election, to the time when Mr. Lin coln left Springfield for Washington, there had appeared, through the press, and by other channels, vulgar threats and menaces that he should never reach the Capital alive. Little attention was paid to them ; yet some of Mr. Lincoln's per sonal friends in Illinois, without his knowledge, employed a detective, and sent him to Washington and Baltimore to investigate. This detective ascertained the existence of a plot to assassinate the President elect, as he passed through Baltimore. The first intelligence Mr. Lincoln had of this was at Philadelphia. After the ceremonies of the day, he was called to the room of Mr. Judd, a devoted friend, who had 170 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. accompanied him from Illinois, aud the facts laid before bim. He was urged to start at once for Washington, taking the train that night, by which he would reach the Capital early the following morning; and thus he would pass through Baltimore in the night, and two days earlier than the con spirators anticipated, and so avoid the danger. He had ap pointments to meet the citizens of Philadelphia at Inde pendence Hall, and the Legislature of Pennsylvania at Har risburg. He therefore declined starting for Washington that night, but was finally persuaded to allow his friends to ar range for him to return to Philadelphia, and go to Washing ton the evening after the ceremonies at Harrisburg. On the next day, the 22d of February, Mr. Lincoln visited the old Independence Hall, where the Congress of the Revolution adopted, amidst the most solemn deliberation and grave de bate, the Declaration of Independence. This had ever been the Bible of Mr. Lincoln's political faith. However others might differ, he believed, with his whole heart, in the Decla ration of Independence. It was to him no tissue of " glitter ing generalities," but he gave to it an honest, hearty homage and reverence. He made the following speech on the occasion. He said: AU the political sentiments I entertain have been drawn, so far as I have been able to draw them, from the sentiments which originated iu, and were given to the world from this hall. I never had a feeling, politically, that did not spring frora the sentiraents embodied lu the Declaration of Independence. It was not the mere matter of the separation of the colonies from the mother land, but that .lentiment in the Declaration of Independence which gave liberty, not alone to the people of this country, but, I hope, to the world for all future time. It was that which gave promise that, in due time, the weight would be lifted from the shoulders of men. This is the sentiment embodied in the Declaration of Inde pendence. Now, my friends, can this couutry be saved upon that basis? If it can, I will consider myself one of the happiest men in the world, if I can help to save it. If it cannot be saved upon that principle, it will be truly awful ! But if this country cannot be saved without giving up the principle, I was about to say, " I ¦would rather be assassinated on tlie spot, than surrender it." ***** I have said nothing but what I am willing to live by, and if it be the pleasure of Almighty God, to die by. The allusion to the assassination was not accidental. The subject had been brought to his attention in such a way that, although he did not feel there was serious danger, yet he had just been assured positively, by a detective, whose veracity PLOT TO ASSASSINATE LINCOLN AT BALTIMORE. 171 his friends vouched for, that a secret conspiracy was organ ized, at a neighboring city, to take his life on his way to the Capital. He went to Harrisburg, according to arrangement ; met the Legislature, and retired to his roora. Meanwhile, Gen eral Scott and Mr. Seward had learned, through other sources, the existence of the plot to assassinate him, and had de spatched Mr. F. W. Seward, a son of Senator Seward, to apprise him of the danger. Information coming to him from both these sources, each independent of the other, induced him to yield to the wishes of his friends, and anticipate his journey to Washington. Besides, from Baltimore there had reached him no commit tee, either of the municipal authorities or of citizens, to tender him the hospitalities, and to extend to him the courtesies of that city, as had been done by every city through which he had passed. He was persuaded to permit the detective to arrange for his going to Washington that night. The tele graph wires to Baltimore were cut; and, with one friend, wearing, not a Scotch cap, (as alleged by the daily press), but a felt hat, which some friend had presented to him, he ar rived at Philadelphia, drove to the Baltimore depot, and the next morning the Capital was startled by the announcement of his arrival. Mr. Lincoln, long afterwards, declared : " I did not then, nor do I now, believe I should have been assassinated, had I gone through Baltimore, as first contemplated ; but I thought it wise to run no risk, where no risk was necessary."* Those who review the facts, in regard to the conspiracy, in the light of his subsequent assassination, can entertain no doubt, either of the existence of the plot, the fiendish de termination of the conspirators, nor that many prominent rebels were knowing and consenting to it. A letter is in ex istence, from the Governor of a border slave State, written before that date, and in reply to an application for arms, ask ing whether they would be used " to kill Lincoln and his men?"t * stated to the author by Mr. Lincoln, from whom the foregoing facts, lu regard to the assassination plot, were obtained. t It is due to this Governor, to say, that he was subsequently a devoted Unionist, and explained this letter, by stating it to have been a, joke. 172 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. General Scott, Joseph Holt, Secretary of War, Edwin M Stanton Attorney General, and others, had made such ar rangements as secured his immediate safety. General Sum ner, then colonel; General Hunter, then major in the regular army, and other devoted and watchful friends, were around him. So many of his supporters, from the free States, followed him, that a large body of citizens could have been immediately organized as soldiers, if necessary. OHAPTEE YIII. LINCOLN IN THE WHITE HOUSE. Lincoln's Inauguration and Inaugural — Douglas and his Prophecy — Lincoln's Cabinet — Condition op Affairs on THE 4th op March, 1861 — Benjamin F. Butler's Position — The " Prodigal Son." MR. Lincoln availed himself of the earliest opportunity, after his arrival at the Capital, to express his kindly feelings to the people of Washington and the Southern States. On the 27th of February, when waited upon by the Mayor and Common Council of Washington, he assured them, and through them the South, that he had no disposi tion to treat them in any other way than as neighbors, and that he had no disposition to withhold from them any consti tutional right. He assured the people that they should have all their rights under the Constitution. " Not grudgingly, but fully and fairly." On the 4th of March, 1861, Abraham Lincoln was inaugu rated President of the United States. An inauguration, so impressive and solemn as this, had not occurred since that of Washington. The ceremonies took place, as usual, at and on the eastern colonnade of the Capitol. General Scott had gathered a few soldiers of the regular army, and had caused to be organized some militia, to preserve peace, order and security. Thousands of Northern voters thronged the streets of Wash ington, only a very few of them conscious of the volcano of treason and murder, thinly concealed, around them. The public offices and the departments were full of plotting trai tors. Many of the rebel generals, including Lee, the John stons, Ewell, Hill, Stewart, Magruder, Pemberton, and others, 173 ' 174 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. held commissions under the government they were about to abandon and betray. Spies were everywhere. The people of Washington were, a large portion of them, in sympathy with the conspirators. None who witnessed it will ever forget the scene of that inauguration. Oh the magnificent eastern front of the Cap itol, surrounded by the Senate and House of Representatives, the Judges of the Supreme Court, the Diplomatic Corps, the high officers ofthe Army and the Navy, a vast crowd outside of the guards ; a crowd of mingled patriots and traitors ; men looking searchingly into the eyes of every stranger, to dis cover whether he gazed on a traitor or a friend. Standing in the most conspicuous position, amidst scowling traitors, with murder and treason in their hearts, Lincoln was per fectly cool and determined. Near him was President Bu chanan, with his white neck-tie, seemingly bowed down with the consciousness of duties unperformed ; there were Chief Justice Taney and his associates, who had disgraced Ameri can jurisprudence by the Dred Scott decision ; there was Chase with his fine and imposing presence ; and the vener able Scott, his towering form still unbroken by years ; the ever hopeful and philosophical statesman Seward; the scholarly, uncompromising Sumner; blunt Ben. Wade. There were distinguished governors of states, and throngs of eminent men from everj' section of the Union. But there was no man more observed than the great rival of Mr. Lin coln, — Douglas. He had been most marked and thoughtful in his attentions to the President elect, and now his small but sturdy figure in striking contrast to the towering form of Lincoln, was conspicuous ; gracefully extending every cour tesy to Ms successful competitor.* His bold eye, from which flashed energy and determination, was eagerly scanning the crowd, not unconscious it is believed, ofthe personal danger which encircled the President, and perfectly ready to share it with him. Lincoln's calmness arose from an entire absence of self-consciousness ; he was too fully absorbed with the grav- * The author is here reminded of the following incident: As Mr. Lincoln removed his hat, before commencing the reading of his "Inaugural" — from the proximity of the crowd, he saw nowhere to place it; aud Mr. Douglas, by his side, seeing this, instantly extended his hand and held the President's hat while he was occupied in reading the address. Lincoln's inaugural 175 ity of the occasion, and the importance of the events around and before him, to think of himself With a voice so clear and distinct that he could be heard by thrice ten thousand men, he read his inaugural address. This address is so important, and shows so clearly the causelessness of the rebellion, that no apology is offered for the following quotations from it : " Fellow Citizens op the United States : In compliance with a custom as old as the government itself, I appear before you to address you briefly, and to take in your presence the oath prescribed by the the Constitution of the United States, to be taken by the President "before he enters upon the execution of his office." * * * * " Apprehension seems to exist, among the people of the Southern States, that by the accession of a Republican administration, their property and their peace and personal security, are to be endangered. There has never been any real cause for such apprehension. Indeed, the most ample evidence to the contrary has all the while existed and been open to their inspection. It is found in nearly all the published speeches of him -who no-w addresses you. I do but quote from one of those speeches when I declare that "I have no purpose, directly or in directly, to interfere with the institution of slavery, in the states where it now exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so , and I have no inclination to do so." Those who nominated and elected me, did so with a full knowledge that I had made this and many similar declara tions, and have never recanted them. ***** " I now reiterate those sentiments, and, in doing so, I only press upon the public attention the most conclusive evidence of which the case is susceptible, that the property, peace, and security, of no section, are to be in anywise endangered by the now incoming administration. * * * "I hold, that in contemplation of universal law, and of the Constitu tion, theUnion ofthe States is perpetual. Perpetuity is implied, if not expressed in the fundamental law of all National Governments. * * " I therefore consider that, in view of the Constitution and the laws, the Union is unbroken, and to the extent of my ability I shall take care, as the Constitution itself expressly enjoins upon me, that the latns of Ahe Union he faithfully executed in all the States. * * * * As Mr. Lincoln pronounced the foregoing sentence, with clear, firm and impressive emphasis, a visible sensation ran through the vast audience, and earnest, sober, but hearty cheers from men, who hear boldly expressed a clear duty — but I'llS LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. one involving grave and perhaps perilous consequences were given. He went on : " In doing this there need be no bloodshed nor violence; and there shall be none, unless it be forced upon the national authority. The power confided to me will be used to hold, and occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the government, and to collect the duties and imposts ; but beyond what may be necessary for these ob jects, there will be no invasion, no using of force against or among the people anywhere. Where hostility to the United States, in any inte rior locality shall be so great and universal as to prevent competent resident citizens from holding the Federal offices, there will be no at tempt to force obnoxious strangers among the people for that object. While the strict legal right may exist in the government, to enforce the exercise of these offices, the attempt to do so would be so irritating, and so nearly impracticable, withal, I deem it better to forego — for the time — the use of such offices. ****** " Physically speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other, nor build an impassable wall be tween them. A husband and wife may be divorced, and go out of the presence, and beyond the reach of each other, but the different parts of our country cannot do this. ****** "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise the constitutional right of amending it, or their revolution ary right to dismember or overthrow it. I cannot be ignorant of the fact that many worthy and patriotic citizens are desirous of having the national Constitution amended. ****** "My countrymen, one and all, think calmly and well upon this whole subject. Nothing valuable can be lost by taking time. If there be an object to hurry any of you in hot haste to a step which you would never take deliberately, that object will not be frustrated by taking time; but no good object can be frustrated by it. Such of you as are now dissatisfied, still have the old Constitution unimpaired, and on the sensitive point, the laws of your own framing under it. The new administration will have no immediate power, if it would, to change either. If it were admitted that you who are dissatisfied hold the right side in the dispute, there still is no single good reason for precipe itate action. Intelligence, patriotism, Christianity, and a firm reliance on Him, who has neyer yet forsaken this favored land, are still compe tent to adjust, in the best way, all our present difficulties. * * * LINCOLN'S INAUGURAL. 177 " In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow countrymen, and not in mine, are the momentous issues of civil war. The government will not assail vou. " You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. You have no oath registered in heaven to destroy the government, while I shall have the most solemn one to "preserve, protect, and defend it. "I am loth to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies — though passion may have strained, it must not break- our bonds of affection. " The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battle-field and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone, all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely it will be by the better angels of our nature." In his own peculiarly clear and simple manner, he vindi cates himself and his party from all cause of apprehension on the part of the slaveholding States. He assures the people " that the property, peace, and security of no section, are to be in anywise endangered by the incoming administration." In clear, but most moderate and inoffensive language, he firmly announced his intention to fulfil the sworn duties of his office, by taking care that the laws of the Union shall be executed in all the states. There will be no bloodshed or violence unless it be forced upon the National authority. His closing appeal against civil war, was most pathetic ; and, as he uttered the solemn words, for the first time during the delivery, his voice faltered with emotion. He said : " In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow countrymen, and not in mine, are the momentous issues of civil war. The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. Tou have no oath registered in Heaven to destroy the Government, while /shall have the most solemn one to preserve, protect, and defend, it. ' I am loth to close,' said he pathetically. We are not enemies, but friends. 'We must not he enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affeoti6n. " The mystic cords of memory, stretching from every battle-fiel^i and patriot grave, to every living heart and hearthstone, all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature." 12 178-, LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Alas ! such appeals were received by the parties to whom they were addressed, with jeers, and ribaldry, and all the maddening passions which riot in blood and war. It was to fvrce only, stern, unflinching power and severity, that the powers and passions of treason alone would yield. With reverent look and impressive emphasis, he then re peated the oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitu tion of his country. Douglas, who knew from his personal familiarity with the conspirators, better than Lincoln, the dangers that surrounded and were before him, who knew the conspirators and their plots, with patriotic magnamity, which in love of country, fo..'got self — then grasped the hand of the President, gracefully expressed his congratulations, and the author has reason to believe, expressed the assurance that in the dark future he would stand by him, and give to him his utmost aid in upholding the Constitution, and enforc ing the laws of his country. Nobly did Douglas redeem that pledge. Here the author pauses a moment, to relate a most singu lar prophecy, in regard to the war, uttered by Douglas, Jan uary 1st, 1861. On that day, in reply to a gentleman,* mak ing a New Year's call, and who inquired, " what will be the result of the eflbrts of Jefferson Davis, and his associates, to divide the Union ?" " Rising, and looking," says my inform ant, "like one inspired, Douglas replied:" "The cotton States are making an effort to draw in the border States to their schemes of secession, and I am but too fearful they will succeed. If they do succeed, there will be the most terrible civil war the world has ever seen, lasting for years." Paus ing a moment, he exclaimed, "Virginia will become a char- nel house, but the end will be the triumph of the Union cause. One of their first efforts will be to take possession of this Capital to give them prestige abroad, but they will never succeed in taking it — the North will rise en masse to defend it— but Wasshington will become a city of hospi tals — the churches will be used for the sick and wounded — even this house, (Minnesota block, afterwards, and during the war, the Douglas Hospital^ may be devoted to that • General Charles Stewart, of New York. DOUGLAS' PROPHESY. 179 purpose before the end ofthe war." The friend to whom this was said, inquired, "What justification for all this?" Doug las replied, " There is no justification, nor any pretense of any — if they will remain in the Union, I will go as far as the Constitution will permit, to maintain their just rights, and I do not doubt a majority of Congress would do the same. But," said he, again rising on his feet, and extending his arm, " if the Southern States attempt to secede from this Union, without further cause, I am in favor of their hav ing just so many slaves, and just so much slave territory, as they can hold at the point of the bayonet, and no m-ore." The President, having been inaugurated, announced his Cabinet as follows : William H. Seward, Secretary of State ; Simon Cameron, Secretary of War; Salmon P. Chase, Secre tary of the Treasury; Gideon Welles, Secretary ofthe Navy; Caleb B. Smith, Secretary of the Interior; Montgomery Blair, Postmaster General, and Edward Bates, Attorney General. Four of this Cabinet, viz :, Messrs. Seward, Chase, Came ron, and Bates, were candidates for the nomination for the Presidency at the Chicago Convention. Mr. Seward, the Secretary of State, was Mr. Lincoln's most formidable com petitor; on the first ballot, receiving the highest number of votes given to any one. He had been among the most dis tinguished of the great men of New York. He had been the recoguized leader of the republican party, and had advocated with great ability, very radical anti-slavery measures. He had by his speeches and influence, done as much, perhaps more than any other man, to create and consolidate the pop ular judgment and feeling which triumphed in 1860. He was an accomplished scholar and a polished gentleman, familiar with the history of his country and its foreign policy, and admirably adapted to conduct its foreign correspondence. His mind was philosophic and didactic. He always took a cheerful and hopeful view of affairs, never anticipated evil — believed the rebellion would last " sixty days." He was a shrewd politician, and did not, in the distribution of patron age, forget the " Seward men." On going into the Cabinet he became conservative, and his influence since has been always against extreme -views. 180 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Saimon P. Chase, Secretary of the Treasury, had been also a prominent candidate for the Presidency. He was a man of commanding person, and fine manly presence, dignified, se date, and earnest. His mind was comprehensive, logical, and judicial. He was an earnest, determined, consistent, radical abolitionist. His had been the master mind at the Buffalo Convention of 1848, and his pen had framed the Buffalo plat form. By his writings, speeches, and forensic arguments, and as Governor of the State of Ohio, and in the United States Senate, acting with the accomplished free-soil Senator from Massachusetts, Charles Sumner, he had contributed largely to the formation of the republican party. Up to the time he became Secretary of the Treasury, he had developed DO special adaptation to, or knowledge of finance ; but he brought to the duties of that most difficult position, a clear judgment, and sound sense. Simon Cameron, had been a very successful Pennsylvania politician ; he was of Scutch descent, as his name indicates, with inherent Scotch fire, pluck, energy, and perseverance. He had a marked Scotch face, a keen gray eye, was tall and commanding in form, and had the faculty of never forgetting a friend, nor an enemy. He was accused of being unscrupu lous, of giving good offices and fat contracts to his friends. He retired after a short time, to make room for the com bative, rude, fearless, vigorous, and unflinching Stanton. A man who was justly said to have "organized victory." Montgomery Blair, the Postmaster General, represented the Blair family. A family of large political influence, and long connected with National affairs. F. P. Blair, Sen., as the editor of the Globe, during General Jackson's administration, was one of the ablest and strongest of the able men who sur rounded that great man. He had associated with, and was the friend of Benton, Van Buren, and Silas Wright, he had seen those friends stricken down by the slave power, and he had learned to hate and distrust the oligarchy of slaveholders, and his counsels and advice, and his able pen, had efficiently aided .in building up the party opposed to slavery. Montgomery Blair had argued against the Dred Scott de cision. F. P. Blair, Jr., and B. Gratz Brown, had led the Lincoln's cabinet. 181 anti-slavery men of Missouri, and had, stfter a most gallant contest carried the city of St. Louis, and the former was now its honored representative in Congress. Edward Bates, the Attorney General, was a fine, dignified, scholarly, gentlemanly lawyer of the old school. i- -Gideon Wells had been a leading editor in New England, and has conducted the affairs ofthe Navy with great ability; Caleb B. Smith was a prominent politician from Indiana, and had been a colleague of Mr. Lincoln in Congress. On the evening of the 4th of March, Mr. Lincoln entered the White House, as the National Executive. He found a Government in ruins. The conspiracy which had been preparing for thirty years, had culminated. Seven States had passed ordinances of seces sion, and had already organized a rebel Government at Mont gomery. The leaders in Congress, and out of it, had fired the excitable Southern heart, and had infused into the young men, a fiery headlong zeal, and they hurried on with the greatest rapidity, the work of revolution. They ordained rebellion, and christened treason, secession. South Carolina, as already stated, having long waited for an occasion, took the lead, and had eagerly seized the pretext of the election of Mr. Lincoln, and on the 17th of November, 1860, passed unanimously, an ordinance of secession. Georgia, against the remonstrances of Alexander H. Ste phens, and others of her statesmen, followed, on the 19th of December, by a vote of 208 against 89. Ordinances of seces sion had been adopted by Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Louisiana, and Texas. North Carolina still hesitated. The people of that staunch old Union State, first voted down a call for a convention, by a vote of 46,671 for, to 47,333, against, but a subsequent con vention, on the 21st of May, passed an ordinance of secession. Nearly all the Federal forts, arsenals, dock-yards, custom houses and post offices within the territories of the seceded States, had been seized, and were held by the rebels. Large numbers of the officers of the army and the navy, deserted, entering the rebel service. Among the most conspicuous in this infamy, was General David E; Twiggs, the second 182 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. officer in rank, in the army of the United States, and in Janu ary, 1861, commanding the Department of Texas. He had been placed there by Secretary Floyd, because he was known to be in the conspiracy. Secretary Holt, on the 18th of Jan uary, ordered that he should turn over his command to Col onel Waite; but before this order reached Colonel Waite, Twiggs had consummated his treason by surrendering to the rebel Ben. McCullough, all the National forces in Texas, numbering twenty-five hundred men, and a large amount of stores and munitions of war. Strange as it may seem, the resignations of many officers were received and accepted, and the traitors instead of being arrested, were suffered to pass over to the insurgents. The civil officers of the United States were not permitted to exercise their functions in the seceded States under penalty of imprison ment and death. All property of the National Government was seized and appropriated to the rebellion. Debts due to the Government and to individuals in the loyal States, and the property of Union men, were confiscated. There was little or no struggle in the Gulf States, except ing in Northern Alabama, against the wild tornado of excitement in favor of rebellion, which carried everything before it. In the border States, in Maryland, Virginia, North Caro lina, Tennessee, and Missouri, there was a contest, and the friends of the Union made a struggle to maintain their position. Ultimately the Union triumphed in Maryland, Ken tucky, and Missouri ; and the rebels carried the State of Tennessee against a most gallant contest on the part of the Union men of East Tennessee, under the lead of Andrew Johnson, Governor Brownlow, Horace Maynard, and others. They also carried Virginia, which seceded April 17th, and North Carolina, which adopted secession on the 20th of Mav. Some of the rebel leaders labored under the delusion, and they most industriously inculcated it among their followers that there would be no war ; that the North was divided ; that the Northern people would not fight, and if there was war, a large part of them would oppose coercion, and B. F. butler's POSITION. 183 perhaps fight on the side of the rebellion.* There was in the tone of a portion of the Northern press, and in the speeches of some of the Northern democrats, much to encourage this idea, and some leading republican papers were at least am biguous on the subject. There was, however, one prominent man from Massachusetts, who had united with the rebel leaders in support of Breckinridge, who sought to dispel this idea. This was Benjamin F. Butler, who carae to Washington, to know of his old political associates what it raeant ? " It means," said his Southern friends, " separation, and a Southern Confederacy. We will have our independence, and establish a Southern Government, with no discordant elements." " Are you prepared for war," said Butler. " Oh ! there will be no war ; the North will not fight." " The North will fight. The North will send the last man, and expend the last dollar to maintain the government," said Butler. " But," said his Southern friends, " the north can't fight, we have too many allies there." "You have friends," said Butler, "in the North, who will stand by you so long as you fight your battles in the Union ; but the moment you fire on the flag, the Northern people will be a unit against you." "And," added Butler, "you may be assured if war comes, slavery ends." Butler, sagacious and true, became satisfied that war was inevitable. With the boldness and directness which has ever marked his charac ter, he went to Buchanan, and advised the arrest of the com missioners sent by the seceding states, and their trial for treason. This advice was as characteristic of Butler to give, as of Buchanan to disregard. During the last months ofBuchanan's administration, there was a struggle between the conspirators in his cabinet, and the honest men — ^Dix, who had replaced Cobb as Secretary of *Ex President Pierce In a letter to Jefferson Davis, dated January 6th, 1860, among other things said: "If through the madness of Northern abolitionists, that dire calamity, (disruption of the Union,) must come, the fighting will not be along Mason and Dixon's Hue merely. It will be iviihin our oum borders, in our own streets between the two classes of citizens to whom I have referred. Those who defy law, and scout Constitutional obligation, will, if we ever reach the arbitrament of arms, flnd occupation enough at home !" Such a letter is sufficiently signiflcant. 184 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the Treasury; Holt, who had replaced Floyd, as Secretary of War; and Stanton, who had replaced Black as Attorney Gen eral ; Black having been called to the department of State, on the indignant retirement of Gen. Cass from that position, when Buchanan refused to reinforce Anderson at Moultrie. When Lincoln entered upon his duties as President, such had been the misrepresentation of the speakers and press in ' the Southern States, that the people regarded him as a savage monster, in form and in character. The following incidents will illustrate this feeling. A distinguished South Carolina lady, the widow of a Northern scholar, proud, aristocratic, and conscious of " tlie blood of all ihe Howards," and to whom Lincoln had been rep resented as a demon, half ape and half tiger, the very devil himself — called upon him at Willard's Hotel, just before his inauguration. The President elect came into the parlor ac companied by senators Hale, Seward, and others, prominent members of Congress. As she approached, (she was nearly as tall as the President,) she hissed in his ear, " South Carolinian !" He turned and addressed her with the greatest courtesy and gentlemanly politeness. After listening to him a few moments, astonished, she said to hira : " Mr. Lincoln, you look, act, and speak like a huraane, kind and benevolent man !" He replied, "Did you take me for a savage, madam ?" " Certainly, I did," said she. Such was the impression his genial, benevolent nature made upon her, that she said to him, " Mr. Lincoln, the best way for you to preserve peace is to go to Charleston, and show the people what you are, and tell them you have no intention of injuring them." She went home, and entering a room, where were assembled a partyof se cessionists from South Carolina,Georgia and Alabama, exclaim ed as she entered, " I have seen him ! I have seen him !" " Who ?" enquired they. " That terrible monster, Lincoln, and what is more, I am going to his first levee." The evening of the reception arrived, and dressing herself in a black velvet dress, with two long white plumes in her hair, this tall daughter of South Carolina repaired to the White House. Being nearly six feet high, with black hair, black eyes, a Calhoun THE PRODIGAL SON. 185 or Cataline face, (as her friends called it,) in her velvet robes, with her long, white plumes, she was a very striking and majestic figure. As she approached the President, he recognized her instantly. "Here I am again," said she, " that South Carolinian." " I am glad to see you," said he, " and I assure you that the first object of my heart is to pre serve peace, and I -wish every son and daughter of South Carolina were here, that I might tell them so." Meeting Mr. Cameron, Secretary of War, " South Carolina is the " Prodigal Son," aaid he. She replied instantly, "Ah, Mr. Secretary, but " The father divided the inheritance and let him go, but they say youare goingto make war on Carolina." In the light of to-day how aptly Mr. Cameron might have replied, that the " Prodigal son, after having spent his portion in riotous living, would arise, and go to his father;" and he might have prophecied, that when the seceding States " had spent all, and there should arise a mighty famine in the land, "they would be compelled to say, "We will arise and go unto our father and say, Father, we have sinned against Heaven and before thee, and am no more worthy to be called thy son, make us as one of thy hired servants." The parable has been literally fulfilled. The people of the South after spending their all in the war, came to Washington and said to the President, " We are no more worthy to be called thy sons, make us as hired servants." But the President, with a wisdom as yet very questionable, when the rebel states were yet "a great way off, had compassion on them, and ran out to meet them, and fell on their neck and kissed thera, and he brought forth the best robe and put it on thera, and rings on their hands and shoes on their feet, and killed the fatted calf" " But Massachusetts, the elder son and the elder brothers were not pleased with this, and doubting the sincerity of their repentance, and like the elder brother .of the " Prod igal son," complained and were angry. Is it yet time for Liberty to reply to Massachusetts, " son, thou art ever with me, and all that I have, is thine — it was meet that we should make merry and be glad, for these, thy erring brothers were dead, and are alive again — they were lost and are found." OHAPTEE IX FROM THE 4TH OF MARCH TO THE 4TH OF JULY, 1861— FROM THE INAUGURATION OF LINCOLN TO THE MEETING OF CONGRESS. The Kebels send Commissioners to Washington — Position of THE Border States — The Kebels Begin the War — Attack ON Sumter — Danger of Washington — President's' Call por 75,000 Men — Douglas Supports Lincoln — Uprising op the People — Murder op Massachusetts Soldiers — Response op Border States to Call por Teqops — The North-west — Vir ginia, Tennessee, Maryland — Henry Winter Davis — The Clay Guards — Missouri, Blockade of Seceding States — Calls for Additional Troops — Rebels Seize Harper's Fer ry and GrospoRT Navy- Yard — Death op Ellsworth — Great Britain and France Recognize the Rebels as Belligerents — Lee and Benedict Arnold — Death op Douglas. ON the 12th of March the Confederate authorities commis sioned John Forsyth, M. J. Crawford and A. B. Roman, Commissioners to the United States, with a view, as they said, to a speedy adjustment of all questions growing out of the political separation. Mr. Seward, Secretary of State, declined to. receive them; denied that the Confederate States had, in law, or in fact, withdrawn from the Union ; denied that they could do so, ex cept through a National Convention, assembled under the provisions of the Constitution. On the 9th of April the Commissioners withdrew from Washington, after addressing a letter to the Secretary of State, saying that they, on behalf of the rebel Government, accepted the gage of battle, etc. And yet, aftfer the receipt of this letter, such was the unparal leled forbearance ofthe Government,that these Commissioners 186 POSITION OF AFFAIRS, MARCH, 1861. 187 were not arrested, but permitted quietly to withdraw, with the open avowal of going home to wage war ! On the 18th of March, General Braxton Bragg, command ing insurgent forces in Florida, issued an order, forbidding the citizens of the Confederate States from furnishing sup plies to the Navy of the United States. At this period, in March, even Mr. Douglas had not fully made up his mind, in favor of coercing the seceding States, into submission. Prominent Democrats in the free States, openly advocated the joining of Northern States to the Con federacy." Such was the undecided condition of public sen timent, in the free States in March ; and as yet the Govern ment of Mr. Lincoln had taken no bold, decided action, clear ly indicating its policy. Meanwhile the Confederate author ities had siezed, as has been stated, with few exceptions, all the arsenals, forts, custom-houses, post-offices, ships, ordi nance and material of war, belonging to the United States, and within the seceding States ; and this, notwithstanding that General Dix, Secretary of the Treasury, had i ssued an order,directing that "If any man attempts to haul down the Araerican flag, shoot him on the spot." No position of greater difficulty can be conceived, than that of President Lincoln, in the spring of 1861. Congress had adjourned, without making any provision for the ap proaching crisis. The office of Secretary of War, for eight years previous to Mr. Lincoln's administration, had been conducted by Jefferson Davis and John B. Floyd, by whom a collision with the Federal Governraent had been anticipat ed. As we have already seen, they had strengthened the South at the expense of the North. They had arraed the South by robbing the Northern national armories, and scat tered beyond immediate recall, our little army and navy. Besides this, they, and especially Davis, had driven out of the service of the Array as far as possible, every raan who was not a States'-rights, pro-slavery man. The North was politically divided ; a powerful political party, from long association, was in sympathy with the se ceding States. This party had just come out of a violent contest against the party which had elected Lincoln. The 188 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. border slave states were neariy equally divided in numbers, and while the quiet, better educated and more conservative were for the Union, the young, reckless, and hot-headed were for secession. While South Carolina and some of the other cotton States were substantially a unit for secession, in other slave States there was a strong majority opposed to it. To arouse sec tional feeling and prejudice, and sepure co-operation and unanimity, it was deemed necessary to precipitate measures and bring on a conflict of arms. It was generally said, that the first blood shed would bring all the slave States to the aid of the belligerent State. As before stated, there was a strong party in the North opposed to coercion. Had fhe President assumed the initiative, and comraenced the war, while it would have united the slave States against him, it is not at all clear but it would have alienated a large portion of the Democrats of the North. Mr. Lincoln fully appreciated these difficulties, and these facts explain tnuch that he did, and omitted to do, for which many of his friends censured him in the earlier stages of the rebellion. He sought to hold Virginia, Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri and Tennessee. The rebel leaders made the most strenuous efforts to in duce the above named States to join the Slave Confederacy, butthe discreet and judicious forbearance of the President, to some extent foiled their efforts, and he succeeded in hold ing Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri from joining the rebels. As has been stated, the people of the border States were divided in sentiment, and it was very doubtful, for a tirae, which way they would go. The House of Representatives of Kentucky, on the 22d of January, resolved by a vote of 87 to 6, to resist the invasion of the South at all hazards. The Legislature adopted a resolution directing Governor Magoffin, of that State, by proclamation, to order Confed erate troops off Kentucky soil. Magoffin vetoed this, but it was passed over his veto. In the beginning of Mr. Lincoln's administration he acted on the defensive, while the rebels, from the first, assuraed a bold, defiant tone. The Confederate Government immedi- ATTACK ON SUMTER. 189 ately after it was established, raised troops, borrowed eight millions of money, and offered letters of marque to all who might choose to prey upon the rich commerce of the United States. The rebel Secretary of War, Walker, in a grandil oquent speech, prophecied that, before the 1st of May, the Confederate fiag should float over the dome of the old Cap itol, and it might, eventually, float over Faneuil Hall, itself ! Tt was determined to bring on a collision, by an attack on Fort Sumter. This was designed raore especially and directly to carry the ordinance of secession through the convention of Virginia. To fire the Southern inflammable heart and raise a whirlwind of fury, which would sweep every thing before it, was the reason Davis and his co-conspirators opened the war. On the llth of April, General Beauregard demanded of Major Anderson the surrender of Fort Sumter. The Major refused. On the night of the same day, Beauregard wrote to Anderson, under instructions from the authorities at Montgomery, that if he " would state the time at which he would evacuate Fort Sumter, and agree, that in the mean time he would not use his guns against the Confederates, unless theirs should be employed against Sumter, the Confederates would abstain frora opening fire upon him." At half past two, on the morning of the 12th, Anderson replied, he would evacuate the fort by noon of the 15th. At half past three he was notified, in reply, that the rebels would open their batteries, in an hour from that time. Their bat teries were opened, accordingly, and after a bombardment of thirty-three hours, which the little garrison endured and rephed to with heroic courage, (their provisions and ammu nition having been exhausted) Anderson agreed to evacuate the Fort. He retired from it on Sunday raorning. It is clear the rebels sought a collision, in pursuance of their avowed policy of rousing and inciting the South. The attack on Sumter immediately precipitated the political ele ments, and the people ranged themselves for, or against the Union. The Capital was in a most critical condition. Full of Se cessionists, the roads leading to the North obstructed, and "190 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the city in a condition of siege. The mails, in every direc tion, were stopped, and the telegraph wires cut by the insur gents. The National forces, which were approaching Wash ington were obstructed ; the war and navy departraents were filled with spies, and probably, the White House itself. In this condition of things, it was not deeraed safe to issue or ders through the ordinary channels, because every thing sent in that way, reached the enemy. Special and private mes sengers were sent North, who pursued a circuitous route to the northern cities and governors of loyal States, calling on them to hasten troops to the rescue of the Capital. A com pany of personal friends was organized, M'ho guarded the White House, the Long Bridge crossing the Potomac, and the Arsenals, and probably saved the life of the President, and the Government from overthrow. On the 15th of April, President Lincoln issued his proclamation, calling for 75,000 men. This preclaraation was prepared on Sunday. Before its issue, and while the President was considering the subject, he was visited by Senator Douglas, who expressed his full approval of this call, only regretting that it was not for 200,- 000 raen instead of the number called for. The following dispatch was written by Senator Douglas, and given to the agent of the Associated Press, and sent to every portion of the North : "April 18, 1861, Senator Douglas, called on the Presi dent, and had an interesting conversation, on the present condition of the country. The substance of it was, on the part of Mr. Douglas, that while he was unalterably opposed to the administration in all its political issues, he was pre pared to fully sustain the President, in the exercise of all his Constitutional functions, to preserve the Union, maintain the Government, and defend the Federal Capital. A firm policy and prompt action was necessary. The Capital was in dan ger, and must be defended at all hazards, and at any expense of men and money. He spoke of the present and future, without any reference to the past." * • The original of this dispatch In Douglas' hand writing is now In possession of Hon. George Ashmun, of Massachusetts, who kindly fumished a copy. DOUGLAS SUSTAINS THE PRESIDENT. 191 Thus Douglas lent the influence of his name, with his party and the country, in aid of .this decisive step, towards suppres- ing the rebellion by force. He soon after returned to Illinois, and at Springfield and Chicago, made speeches sus taining the policy of the President, and declaring, that now, there could be but two parties, " patriots and traitors." The speech of Douglas, at Chicago, was made in the im mense building called the " Wigwam," built for, and used by the National Convention which nominated Lincoln for the Presidency. Since the day of that nomination, no such crowd had gathered there, as assembled to hear Douglas. He said we had gone to the very extreme of magnanimity. The return for all which had been done, was war, armies marching on the Capital — a movement to blot the United States from the map of the globe. " The election of Lin coln," said he, " is a mere pretext," the secession raoveraent is the result of an enorraous conspiracy, formed by the lead ers of the Southern Confederacy, before the election of Lin coln. " There can be no neutrals in this war — only 'patriots or traitors." There were those in the border States who deprecated this call, and who expressed the belief that this act precipitated war, and that continued forbearance would have brought on a reaction at the South, which would have resulted in a restoration ofthe Union. They who indulged in such dreams little knew the spirit of the conspirators. Had this call been delayed, even a few hours, or had there been less promptness in responding to it, the President would have been assassin ated, or he would have been a fugitive or a prisoner, and the rebel flag would have waved over the Capitol, and Jefferson Davis would have issued his Proclamations from the White House. Mr. Lincoln pursued the policy of conciliation, in the vain hope of peace, to the very verge of National destruction. The fall of Sumter and the President's call for troops, were the signals for the rally to arms throughout the loyal States. .Twenty millions of people, forgetting party divisions, and all past diff'erences, rose with one voice of patriotic en thusiasm, and laid their hearts and hands, their fortunes and 192 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. their lives upon the altar of their country. The Proclama tion of the President calling for 75,000 men and convening an extra session of Congress to meet on the 4th of July, was followed, in every free State, by the prompt action of the Governors, calling for volunteers. In every city, town, vil lage, and neighborhood, the people rushed to arms, and the strife was, who should have the privilege of marching to the defense of the National Capital. Forty-eight hours had not passed after the issue of the Proclamation at Washington, before four regiments had reported to Gbverner Andrews, at Boston, ready for service. On the 17th, he comraissioned B. F. Butler, of Lowell, as their coramander. Governor Sprague, of Rhode Island, calling the Legisla ture of that State together, on the 17th, tendered to the Gov ernment, a thousand infantry, and a battallion of artillery, and placing himself at the head of his troops, started for Washington. The great State of New York, whose population was nearly four millions, through her Legislature, and the action of Gov ernor Morgan, placed her immense resources in the hands of the National Executive. So did Pennsylvania, with its three millions of people, under the lead of Governor Curtin. And Pennsylvania has the honor of having furnished the troops, that first arrived for the defense of the Capital, reaching there on the 18th, just in time to prevent the seizure of the nearly defenceless city. By the 20th of April, although the quota of Ohio, under the President's call, was only thirteen regiments, 71,000 raen had offered their services through Governor Dennison, the Executive of that State. It was the same everywhere. Half a million of men, citizen volunteers, at this call, sprang to arms, and begged permission to fight for their country. The enthusiasm pervaded all ranks and classes. Prayers for the Union and the integrity of the Nation, were heard in every Church throughout the free States. State Legislatures, Mu nicipalities, Banks, Corporations, and Capitalists everywhere offered their money to the Government, and subscribed im • mense sums for the support of the volunteers and their fami lies. Independent military organizations poured in their THE UPRISING OF THE PEOPLE. 193 offers of service. Written pledges were widely circulated and signed, .offering to the Government the lives and pro perty of the signers, to maintain the Union. Great crowds marched through the principal cities, cheering the patriotic, singing National airs, and requiring all to show, froih their residences and places of business, the stars and stripes, or " the red, white and blue." The people, through the press, by public meetings, and by resolutions, placed their property and lives at the disposal of the Government. At this gloomy period, through the dark clouds of .gather ing war, uprose the mighty voice of the people to cheer the heart of the President Onward it came, like the rush of many waters, shouting the words that became so familiar during the war — We are coming, Father Abraham, ^ Six hundred thousand strong. The Government was embarrassed by the number of men volunteering, for its service. Hundreds of thousands more, were offered, than could be armed or received. Senators, members of Congress, and other prominent men, went to Washington to influence the Government to accept the ser vices ofthe eager regiments, everywhere imploring permission to serve. The volunteer soldier was the popular idol. He was every where welcome. Fair hands wove the banners which he car ried, and knit the socks and shirts which protected him from the cold; and everywhere they lavished upon him every luxury, and comfort, which could cheer and encourage him. Every one scorned to take pay from the soldier. Colonel Stetson, proprietor of the " Astor House Hotel, in New York, replied to General Butler's offer to pay — " The Astor House makes no charge for Massachusetts soldiers." And while the best Hotels were proud to entertain the soldier, whether private or officer, the latch-string of the cabin and farm-house was never drawn in upon him who wore the National blue. Such was the universal enthusiasm of the people for their country's defenders. 13 194 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. The feeling of fierce indignation towards those seeking to destroy the Government, was greatly increased by the attack of a mob in the streets of Baltimore, upon the Sixth regi ment of Massachusetts volunteers, while passing from one depot to the other, on their way to the Capital. This attack on the 19th of Aprilj in which several soldiers were shot down, roused the people to the highest pitch of excitement. The secessionists were so strong in that State as to induce the Mayor of Baltimore, and Governor Hicks, a Union man, to protest against troops marching over the soil of Maryland, to the defense of the National Capital. They burned the bridges on the railroads leading to Washington, and for a time, interrupted the passage of troops through Baltimore. The Governor so far humiliated himself, and forgot the dig nity of his State and Nation, as to suggest that the differ ences between the Government and its rebellious citizens, should be referred to Lord Lyons, the British Minister. The Secretary of State fittingly rebuked this unworthy sugges tion; alluding to an incident, in the late war with Great Britain, he reminded the Governor of Maryland, " that there had been a time when a General of the American Union, with forces designed for the defense of its Capital, was not unwelcorae anywhere in Maryland;" and he added, "that if all the other noble sentiments of Maryland had been ob literated, one, at least, it was hoped would remain, and that was, that no domestic contention should be referred to any foreign arbitrament, least of all, to that of a European Monarchy." While such was the universal feeling of loyal enthusiasm throughout the free States, in the border slave States, there was division and fierce conflict. Governor Magoffin, of Ken tucky, in reply to the President's call, answered, " I say, em phatically, Kentucky will furnish no troops for the wicked purpose of subduing her sister Southern States." Governor Harris, of Tennessee, said: "Tennessee will not furnish a man for coercion, but 50,000 for the defense of our Southern brothers." Governor Jackson, of Missouri, refused, saying, " not one man will Missouri furnish to carry on such an un holy crusade;" and Virginia, not only refused through her ACTION OF THE NORTHWEST. 196 Governor, to respond, but her Convention then in session, immediately passed an ordinance of secession, by a vote of 88 to 55. The Northwest, the home of the President, and the horae of Douglas, was, if possible, more emphatic, it could scarcely be more unanimous, than other sections of the free States, in the expression of its deterraination to maintain the Union at all hazards, and at any cost. The people of the vast country between the AUeghanies and the Rocky Mountains, and North ofthe Ohio, regarded the Mississippi as peculiarly their river, their great outlet to the sea. Proud and confident in their hardy strength, familiar with the use of arms, they never at any time, for a moment, hesitated in their determin ation, in no event, to permit the erection of a foreign terri tory between themselves and the Gulf of Mexico. Here were ten millions of the most energetic, determined, self- reliant people on earth, who had overcome difficulties, and surmounted obstacles; and the idea that anybody should dare to set up any fiag, other than their's between thera and the ocean, was a degree of audacity they would never toler ate. " Our great river," exclaimed Douglas, indignantly, " has been closed to the commerce of the Northwest." The seceding States, conscious of the strength of this feeling, early passed a law, providing for the free navigation of the Mississippi. But the hardy Western pioneers were not dis posed to accept paper guarantees for perraission to " possess, occupy and enjoy " their own. They would hold the Missis sippi, with their rifies. When closed upon them, they re solved to open it, and they did open it. They imraediately seized upon the important strategetic point of Cairo, and from Belmont to Vicksburg and Fort Hudson, round to Lookout Mountain, Chattanooga, and Atlanta, they never ceased to press the enemy, until the great central artery of the Republic, and all its vast tributaries, from its source to its mouth, were free; and then, marching to the sea, joined their gallant brethren on the Atlantic coast, to aid in the complete overthrow of the rebellion, and the final triumph of liberty and law. 196 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. It has been stated that the people of the border States had been divided in sentiment, and it was very doubtful for a time, which way they would go; but the attack upon Fort Sumpter, and the call by the President, for troops, forced the issue, and the unscrupulous leaders were able to carry Vir ginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas, into the Confederate organization, against the will of a majority of the people of those States. Virginia, the leading State of the Revolution, the one, which under the leadership of Washing ton and Madison had been the most influential in the formar tion of the National Government, the " Old Dominion," as she was usually called, the " Mother of States and of states men," had been for years, descending from her high position. Her early and Revolutionary history had been of unequalled brilliancy ; she had largely shaped the policy of the Nation, and furnished its leaders. Her early statesmen were anti- slavery men, and if she had relieved herself of the burden of slavery, she would have held her position as the leading State of the Union; but, with this heavy drag, the proud Old Commonwealth had seen her younger sisters of the Re public rapidly overtaking and passing her in the race of pro gress, and the elements of National greatness. Indeed she had fallen so low, that her principal source of wealth was from the men, women, and children, she raised and sent; South to supply the slave markets of the Gulf States. Her leading men had been advocating extreme State rights' doc trines, fatal to National Unity, and thus sowing the seeds of secession. Her politicians had threatened disunion, again, and again. Still, when the crisis came, a majority of her people were true; a large majority of their Convention was opposed to secession, and when afterwards, by violence and fraud, the ordinance was passed, the people of the Northwest, the mountain region of Virginia, resisted, and determined to stand by the Union. This portion of the State raaintained its position with fidelity and heroisra, and ultimately estab lished the State of West Virginia. Although Virginia, in January, 1861, voted a million of dollars for defensive purposes, yet as late as April 4th, the Convention, by a vote of eighty-nine to forty-five, voted down ACTION OF VIRGINIA. 197 an ordinance of secession. But the Union men in the Con vention, under various appliances, the promises, threats, and violence used, yielded one after another, until, under the ex citement growing out of the attack upon Fort Sumter and the President's call to arms, the ordinance of secession was forced through. Before this could be done, however, a mob was raised at Richmond by the conspirators and a Com mittee appointed to wait upon certain Union men in the Convention, and advise them that they must either vote for secession, absent themselves, or be hung. The secession of Virginia, added greatly to the danger of Washington, and a bold movement upon it, then, in its defenceless condition, would have been successful. Alexander H. Stephens, Vice President of the Confederacy, came to Richmond, and everywhere raised the cry of " on to Washington !" The State authorities of Virginia did not wait the ratifica tion of the secession ordinance by the people, to whom it was submitted for adoption or rejection, but immediately joined the Confederacy, commenced hostilities, and organ ized expeditions for the capture of Harper's Ferry and the Gosport Navy-yard. Senator Mason immediately issued an address to the people, declaring that those who could not vote for a separation of Virginia from the United States, " must leave the Slate !" Submission, banishment, or death was proclaimed to all Union men of the Old Commonwealth. No where, except in West Virginia, and some small localities, was there resistance to this decree. In the Northwest, the mountain men rallied, organized, resolved to stand by the old flag and protect themselves under its folds. The secession of Virginia, gave to the Confederates a moral and physical power, which imparted to the conflict the proportions of a tremendous civil war. She placed herself as a barrier between her weaker sisters and the Union, and she held her position, with a heroic endurance and courage, worthy of a better cause and of her earlier days. Indeed, she kept the Union forces at bay for more than four long years, preserving her Capital, and yielding only, when the hardy soldiers of the North had marched from the 198 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Cumberland to the sea, cutting her off and making the struggle hopeless. North Carolina, naturally followed Virginia, and on the 21st of May, adopted by a unanimous vote an ordinance of secession, and her Governor, Ellis, called for an enroUraent of 30,000 men. Tennessee, was the daughter of North Carolina, yet her people were widely divided in sentiment and sympathy; East Tennessee, embracing the mountains of the Curaberland range, and the Western slopes of the AUeghanies, where there were few slaves, and peopled by a brave, hardy, and loyal race, were devoted to the Union. In the West, a ma jority of the people were in sympathy with those seeking to overthrow the Government. The Governor, Isham G. Har ris, was an active conspirator, aud in full accord with the enemies pf the Union. General Pillow, on the organization of the rebel Government, hastened to Montgomery, and ten dered it 50,000 volunteers from Tennessee. On the 9th of February, the people voted down secession by 65,000 ma jority! The Union men of that State, under the lead of Andrew Johnson, Horace Maynardj Governor Brownlow, and their associates, determined to raaintain the Union. But the loyal people of Tennesseee were isolated from the free States, unapproachable from the East, except across Virginia, and over the AUeghanies; and from the North separated by the semi-rebellious State of Kentucky. Under these circum stances, it was difficult for Mr. Lincoln to furnish them aid and succor. The State was nearly surrounded by secession influences; the State Government was in the hands of trai tors to the Union, and in June following, by means of fraud, violence, intimidation, and falsehood, an apparent majority was obtained in favor of secession. East Tennessee, however, still indignantly rejected secession, and her sons made a gallant fight for the Union. Maryland, from her location between the free States and the National Capital, occupied a position of the utmost im portance. Could she be induced to join the Confederates their design of siezing the National Capital and its archives would be made comparatively easy. Emissaries from the ACTION OP MARYLAND. 199 conspirators were busy in her borders during the winter of 1861. But while there were many rebel sympathizers and traitors among her slave-holders, and raany leading families gave in their adhesion to the conspiracy, the mass of the people were loyal. The Governor of the State, Thomas H. Hicks, though he yielded for a time to the apparent popular feeling in favor of the Confederates, and greatly embarrassed the Government by his protests against troops marching over Maryland soil to the defence of the Capital, was, at heart, a loyal man, and in the end became a decided and efficient Union leader. He refused, against inducements and threats of personal violence, to call the Legislature of the State to gether, a majority of whom were known to be Secessionists, and who would have passed an ordinance of secession. But the man to whom the people of Maryland are most indebted, and who was most influential in the maintenance of the Union cause, at this crisis, and who proved the benefactor of the State in relieving her from the curse of slavery, was the bold, eloquent and talented Henry Winter Davis. He took his position from the start, for the unconditional maintenance of the Union. The officials of the city of Baltimore, were most of them Secessionists, and its Chief of Police was a traitor, and was implicated in the plot to assassinate Mr. Lincoln on his way to the Capital. On the 19th of April, a mob in the city of Baltimore, had attacked the Massachusetts Sixth regiment, while quietly passing through to the defense of the Capital, and several soldiers and citizens were killed in the affray. The bridges connecting the railways from Pennsylvania and New York, with Baltimore, were burned, and for a time, communication by railroad was interrupted. Gen. B. F. Butler, leading the Massachusetts troops, to gether with the New York Seventh Regiment, were compel led to go around by Annapolis, and to rebuild the railway to Washington. But one dark, stormy night, General Butler marched into Baltimore, encamped on Federal Hill, and re ¦ opened communication with the North. The Union men of Maryland rallied; the leading Secessionists fled, or were 200 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. arrested ; and, from that time, Maryland was a loyal State, lending to the Union the aid of her moral influence, and fur nishing many gallant soldiers to flght its battles. On the 18th of April, the day before the massacre of the Massachusetts soldiers by the Baltimore mob, intelligence reached Washington of a plot, on the part of the secession ists in that city, aided by Virginia, to rise, fire the city, seize as prisoners the President and his Cabinet, and all officials present, take possession of the Government archives, and thus realize the prophecy ofthe rebel Secretary of War, Walk er, that the flag of the Confederates should float over the dome of the Capitol before the first of May. There were, at that time, but few troops in Washington, and the means of defense were very inadequate. Soldiers were hurrying to its defense from Pennsylvania, New York and New England, but a part of the plan was the burning of the bridges of the railways, and the interruption of communi cation betweei; Baltimore and the North, and this part waa successfully executed. When intelligence of this plot was received at Washing ton, there were several hundred gentlemen of high personal character and social position in the city. They immediately met, organized, took an oath of fidelity to the Union, elected Cassius M. Clay of Kentucky, and General James H. Lane of Kansas their leaders, were armed by the War "Department, and, for several days, acted as guards. The party under Lane took up their quarters in the East room of the White House, and the others guarded the city. Arms were placed in the Capitol, it was provisioned for a short seige, and it was prepared to be used in case of necessity as a citadel. Be hind its massive marble walls it was believed that the Presi dent and the officials, and Government archives, might find safety, until the loyal people of the North, rallying to the rescue, should reach the Capital. But Butler soon opened communications ; the New York 7th reached the Capital, and then there were troops enough to make the execution of the plot raadness ; and it was con sequently abandoned. Meanwhile Fortress Monroe, Annap olis and Baltimore, were occupied by Federal troops, and all ACTION OF MISSOURI. 201 danger of an immediate attack ofthe insurgents, disappeared. What course would Missouri, the leading State west of the Mississippi take ? With a population exceeding a million, she had only 115,000 slaves. Her interests were with the free States, yet she had a Governor in direct sympathy with the traitors, and so were the majority of her State officers. A State Convention was called, but an overwhelming majority of Union men had been elected. The truth is, that although the slave power had succeeded in destroying the political power of her great Senator, Thomas H. Benton; yet the seeds of opposition to slavery he had scattered, were everywhere springing up in favor of Union and Liberty. The city of St. Louis, the Commercial Metropolis of the State, had be come a free-soil city; it had elected Francis P. Blair, Jun., a disciple of Benton to Congress. The large German popu lation, under the lead of Franz Siegel and others, were for the Union, to a man. To the President's call for troops, the rebel Governor Clai- burn F. Jackson, returned an insulting refusal, but the peo» pie under the lead of Blair, responded. The United States Arsenal at St. Louis, was, at this time, under a guard commanded by Captain Nathaniel Lyon, one of the boldest and most energetic officers of the army. He, in connection with Colonels Blair, Siegel, and others, organ ized volunteer regiraents in St. Louis, preparing for a con flict, which they early saw to be inevitable. The arms of the St. Louis Arsenal, were, during the night of the 25th of April, under the direction of Captains Stokes and Lyon, transferred to a stearaer and taken to Alton, Illinois, for safety, and were soon placed in the hands of the Volunteers from that State. Governor Jackson had gathered several hundred men whom he called &" State Guard" but whom he intended should be drilled and prepared as rebel soldiers, and with whora he intended to seize the United States arras and the Arsenal. But his design was thwarted by Captains Stokes and Lyon. Lyon then, on the 6th of May, followed up his success in saving the arms, by marching with about six thou sand men to camp Jackson, where the " State Guards" were 202 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. encamped, and surrounded and took them prisoners. He captured twenty cannon, 1,200 new rifies, several chests of muskets, and a large quantity of amunition, most of which the "State Guard" under direction of Governor Jackson, had stolen from the United States arsenals. On the 19th of April, the President issued a proclamation, blockading the ports of the Gulf States, and on the 27th of April, this was extended to North Carolina and Virginia, both of which states had been carried into the vortex of rev olution. On the 3d of May, the President called into the service 42,034 volunteers, for three years, and provided for an addition of over 20,000 men to the regular army. Meanwhile the insurgents had been active and eiiterpris- ing. They had boldly seized Harper's Ferry, and the Gos port Navy Yard, near Norfolk, Virginia. Within twenty- four hours after the Secession ordinance passed the Virginia Convention, they sent forces to capture those places where were very important arsenals of arms and ordinance. Har per's Ferry had long been a National Armoi'y, and comraand ed the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, one of the most im portant connections of the Capital with the Great West. It was the gate to the beautiful valley of the Shenandoah, aud of great importance as a military post. On the 18th of April it was abandoned by its small garrison, and taken possession of by the insurgents. At about the same time, the Gosport Navy Yard, with 2,000 pieces of heavy cannon and various material of war, and large ships, including the Pennsylvania of 120 guns, and the Merrimac, afterwards famous for its combat with the Monitor, fell into their hands. Owing to imbecility, or treachery, or both, this Navy Yard, with its vast stores and property, estimated to be worth from eight to ten millions, was left exposed to seizure and destruction. When it was too late. Commodore Paulding was sent to re lieve the imbecile, if not treacherous, McCauley, and be lieving that he could not defend the Yard and property, he set fire to the ships, attempted to destroy the ordinance, and commit to the flames the Yard and every thing of value con nected with it. The fire was only partially successful, and a DEATH OF ELLSWORTH. 203 very large amount of the property fell into the nands of the rebels. Meanwhile troops gathered to the defense of the National Capital. Among others, eame Colonel Elmer E. Ellsworth, with a splendid regiment which he had raised, picked men from the New York firemen. On the evening of the 23rd of May, the Union forces crossed the Potomac, took possession of Arlington Heights and the hills overlooking Washington and Alexandria. As Colonel Ellsworth was returning frora taking down a rebel fiag from the Marshall House in Alexandria, he was in stantly killed, by a shot fired by the keeper of the hotel over which the obnoxious symbol had floated. This young man had accompanied Mr. Lincoln from Illi nois to Washington, and was a protege of the President. He had introduced the Zouave drill into the United States. He was araong the first raartyrs of the war, and his death was deeply mourned by the President. His body was taken to the Executive Mansion, and his funeral, being the first of those who died in defense of the flag, was very impressive, touching and solemn. He was, almost, the first soldier ever slain in the United States, in civil war. A gold raedal was taken from his body after his death, stained with his hearts' blood, with the inscription "non solem nobis, sed pro patria," "Not for rayself, but for ray country." The secession of Virginia had been followed by the re moval of the rebel Government to Richmond. Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Arkansas had joined the Confederacy. Thus eleven States, through State organiza tions, had withdrawn, and sought to divide the Republic. At last Freedom and Slavery confronted each other, face to face, with arms in their hands. The loyal States at this time, had a population of 22,046,472, and the eleven seced ing States had a population of 9,103,338, of which 3,521,110 were slaves. The Vice President of the Confederate States, in his speech at Milledgeville, Georgia, frankly said : " This {African Slav ery,) was the immediate cause of the late rupture, and pres ent revolution. Jefferson in his forecast had anticipated this. 204 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. as the rock upon which the old Union would split ! He was right; what was conjecture with hira is now a realized fact, &c, ***** * Our new Government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, iis corner stone rests upon the great truth, thai the Negro is not equal io the white man ; that Slavery, subordination to the su perior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new Government, is the first in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical and moral truth." The Confederate Government being based on slavery — this being openly avowed as its corner-stone, how would it be re ceived in Europe, especially by those great nations. Great Britain and France, which had so often reproached the Unit ed States for the existence of slavery ? These great nations and all the world, were now to be spectators of a conflict be tween an established Government, perfectly free, and a con spiracy and rebellion, by a portion of its citizens, avowedly to erect upon its ruins, a governraent based on human slav ery. Surely there was every reason to expect these powers would indignantly rebuke any suggestion that they should recognize a Governraent with such a basis, and that they would, in the most emphatic manner express their disapprov al of a rebellion against an existing government, for such a cause. Yet the Governments of Great Britain and France, acting in concert, even before the representatives of the new Ad ministration arrived at London and Paris, recognized the rebels as a belligerent power. This strange readiness to en courage rebellion, this eagerness to accord belligerent rights to a disorganizing power based on human slavery, was gen erally and justly attributed to a secret hostility, on the part of the .governing classes of Europe, toward the American Republic. The United States stood before the world, as the Representative of freedom, democracy, civilization, order and regular government. The rebels, as a disorganizing rebel lion based on slavery and barbarism ; and yet, the crowned heads and the aristocracy made haste to hail it as a belligerent. The London Times, the great organ of the British Aristoc racy, joyously announced that, " The great Republic is no GREAT BRITAIN AND EUROPE. 205 more! Democracy is a rope of sand!" The United States, it said, lacked the cohesive power to maintain an Empire of such magnitude. Disintegration was, already, exultingly proclaimed to be an accomplished fact, and no power, it was alleged, existed in the Federal Government to unite the fragments of the dis solved Republic. At the moment of extremest National peril, when the son of the western pioneer whom the people had chosen for their Chief Magistrate, appalled by the dangers which gathered around his country, when his great and honest soul, bowed itself to God, and as a simple child, and in deepest supplication asked His blessing, and guidance; at this hour, from no crowned head, from no aristocratic ruler abroad, came any word of symya- thy ; but those proud rulers could jest at his uncouth figure, his uncourtly bearing. "The bubble is burst," said they. The Almighty answered that prayer; He joined the hearts and hnked the hands of the American people and their Pres ident together ; and from that hour, to his death, the needle does not raore quickly respond to the polar influence, than did Lincoln to the highest and God-inspired impulses of a great people — a people capable of the highest heroism and the grandest destiny. Very soon the work-shops of England and Scotland were set in motion to prepare the means of sweeping American commerce from the ocean. The active sympathy of the masses of European popula tions, and the cold and scarcely concealed hostility of the ar istocratic and privileged classes, were early and constantly manifested during the entire struggle. This was, perhaps, not unnatural. In addition to the uneasiness which the rap id growth and commanding position of our country had ere ated, the whole world instinctively felt that the contest was between Freedom and Slavery, Democracy and Aristocracy. Could a Government, for the people and by the people, main tain itself through this fearful crisis ? It was quite evident, trom the beginning, that the privileged classes abroad were more than willing to see the great Republic broken up, to see it pronounced a failure. Mr. Buchanan had left our 206 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. foreign relations in a very deplorable condition ; the Union had few, if any, able and deterrained representatives abroad. The conspirators had prepared the way, as far as possible, by their intrigues, scarcely veiled, for the recognition of the Confederacy. The rebels had a positive, vigorous organiza tion with agents all over Europe, many of them in the dip lomatic service of the United States. They had created a wide-spread prejudice against Mr. Lincoln, representing him as merely an ignorant, vulgar " rail-splitter" of the prairies. Mr. Faulkner, of Virginia, represented our Government in France, and Mr. Preston, a slaveholder frora Kentucky, in Spain, both secessionists. It was not long, however, before Mr. Lincoln irapressed the leading traits of his character upon our foreign policy. Frankness, open, straightforward integrity, patient forbearance, and unbroken faith in the tri umph of the Union and liberty, based on his trust and confi- , dence in the Almighty, and the American people, character ized his foreign policy. This policy was simple and thor oughly American; our Representatives were instructed to ask nothing but what was clearly right, to avoid difficulty, and to maintain peace, if it could be done consistently with National honor. The record of the diplomatic correspond ence of the United States during the critical years of this administration, is one of which Americans may justly be proud. Time and events have -sdndicated the statesraanship by which it was conducted. Mr. Seward, in his instructions to Mr. Adams, on the eve of his departur^e for the Court of St. James, very clearly laid down the principles which should govern our relations with foreign Nations. Mr. Adams was instructed not to listen to any suggestion of coraproraise be tween the United States and any of its citizens, under foreign auspices. He was directed firmly to announce that no foreign Governraent could recognize the rebels as an independent power, and reraain the friends of the United States. Recog nition was War. If any foreign power recognized, they might prepare to enter into an alliance also, with the enemies of the Republic. He was instructed to represent the whole country, and should he be asked to divide that duty with the FOREIGN POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES. 207 Representatives of the Confederates, he was directed to return home. The action of the insurgent States was treated as a rebel lion, purely domestic in its character, and no discussion on the subject with foreign Nations would be tolerated. England did not recognize the Confederates as a Nation. She did not choose war; but short of recognition, alliance and war, it is difficult to see how she could have done more to encourage and aid the insurgents. On the fioor ofthe British Parliament, a member exulted in the secession of the slaveholders, as " The bursting of the bubble. Republic." We have seen that slavery brought on the attempted revo lution. To secure that institution, the aristocracy of the South, the slaveholders, seceded from the Union and drew the sword, declaring to the world their determination to make this their peeuliar institution, the corner-stone of their empire. The Confederacy had secured the cooperation of eleven States; and it had active aid and sympathy frora Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri, while the Union cause had effective and numerous friends in Tennessee, and a large majority in that part of Virginia, since organized into the State of West Virginia. There were, at this time, and raostly in the rebel States, nearly four millions slaves. How should they be treated? Should the Governraent, by offering them freedom, make them its active friends? or alienate them by returning them to slavery? In the light of to-day, it is difficult to realize why there should have been any hesitation or vacillation on this question. The transfer of four millions of people, living in the seceding States, frora the rebel to the Union side, would be decisive. But many of the Union men of Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Maryland, were slaveholders. The Constitution had been generally held as recognizing and pro tecting slavery. By precedent, long established usage, and generally conceded Constitutional obligation, negroes were to be returned by Federal officers, on demand, to their claim ants. The power of the Federal authority under the control of slaveholders, had been long used to return fugitive slaves. 208 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. The National Judiciary, the army, and the navy, had been the instruraents, by which the institution of slavery was up held. The claim of the master to his slave, had been pro tected by extraordinary guaranties unknown to any other species of property, and the right to this species of property had grown to be considered a sacred thing. No " rude hand" must touch it! Abolition and abolitionists were "vulgar fanatics," reckless of Constitutional obligations; slaveholders were gentlemen. For years the Military Academy at West Point, and the Naval School, at Annapolis, had been under pro-slavery influences. For eight years iramediately preced ing the revolt, Jefferson Davis and John B. Floyd, as Secre taries of War, had controlled the army, weeding out those who did not agree with thera in their peculiar views of State rights and slavery. When the insurgents raised the flag of rebellion, the army and navy were scandalized, and the Na tion disgraced by large numbers of the officers deserting their flag. Nearly two hundred of the graduates of the Mili tary School at West Point, deserted and joined the rebel army. From Robert E. Lee, down to the contemptible Bu chanan, who the day before his treason, carae to Mr. Lincoln and said, " If all others desert you, I will stand by you,* there is a catalogue of naraes, which will forever disgrace the annals of the old regular army. The narae of Benedict Arnold, long so conspicuous alike for his treason and his personal courage,has been overshadowed by the cloud of de serters, who turned their swords against the flag they had sworn to defend, and against the country which had adopted and educated them. Among these deserters, the man destined to attain the most conspicuous position in the rebel army, was Robert E. Lee. It is important in the interest of truth, that history should do him justice; that his conduct should be rightly appreciated by the American people, and the world. He bore one of the proudest revolutionary naraes, and had intermar ried with a family, which, by its connection with Washing ton, has always commanded the love and honor of our country. He had received from his country, grateful for the *Thls statement the author received from Mr. Lincoln himself. ROBERT E. LEE. 209 services of his ancestors, the best education her National Military School could give. By accepting such education at her hands, he had dedicated his life to her railitary service. He became the petted soldier, the favorite of his loyal com mander-in-Chief, and the staff of his years. General Scott loved and trusted him; and by his confidential relations to the Lieutenant General, Lee was in possession of all his plans and purposes. Suddenly, on the eve of a rebel war, he de serted his flag, betrayed his Chief, and within two days after his resignation was accepted, he was found in^the rebel ser vice, soon to receive a high coramand. How does his treason corapare -with that of Benedict Arnold ? Each deserted his flag; each was treacherous to his Chief, by whom he was honored and loved; each drew his sword against his country and his old faithful comrades. Lee was as much beloved and honored by Scott, as Benedict Arnold was by Washington. Arnold sought to betray a stronghold into the enemies' hands. Lee took into the rebel councils, full knowledge of Scott's plans, and a minute and accurate knowledge of the railitary establishment of his country. He had been gener ously educated by his country, and his life was doubly pledged to her service ; Arnold was a volunteer, and complained of personal grievances. Lee had the countenance of many trai tors, to keep hira company ; Arnold's infamy, thanks be to God ! was solitary and alone. It cannot be pleaded in exten uation of Lee's treason, that he followed Virginia into seces sion. He deserted before the secession ordinance of his na tive State had been adopted by the people, and he was one of those, who led Virginia into rebellion. Lee's letter of resignation bears date April 20th, and the people of Virginia did not vote on the ordinance of secession until the 23d of May.* To the infamy, justly attaching to him as a deserter frora his flag, and a traitor to his country, the stern logic of truth compels us to add, that he shares with Jefferson Davis, the blacker colors of at least not preventing such fearful in humanity, and cool calculating cruelty, as finds no parallel in the conduct of Arnold, nor in any act of the earlier American history, before the manhood of the South lost its real chivalry, in the barbarities of the slave system. * L»»'s appointment In the rebel service hears date April 22d. 14 210 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. During a long and bloody war, Davis and Lee saw, with out interference, their corarades and fellow soldiers of the days before their fall, raurdered by thousands, while prison ers of war. With their residences at Richraond, one as Pres ident and dictator, and the other as Coraraander of the armies in Virginia, the dark and horrid records of Libby, and Belle Isle, and Andersonville, could not have been un known to them. Those sickening details of slow murder, starvation and suffering, at which huraanity shudders, it would be well, for the sake of our common raanhood, to con- sigti to oblivion, but that they exemplify how some of the best blood of the South could, under the influence of the slave system, be converted into the brutal barbarians, by whom such outrages were perpetrated ! The saddest spec tacle of this fearful war is not the desolated field, the burning city, the homeless family, nor the bloody battle-scene, with its bleeding mutilated sufferers, patient, noble, sublime in their agony; nor is it the hospitals of sick, wounded, and dying; nor is it even those great prison-fields, where faraine, and thirst, and heat, and vitiated air, and nakedness, and vermin, and every loathsome disease, joined with brutal guards, combined to reduce gallant, brave, heroic men to insanity, to imbecihty, to idiocy, and to death. No! the the saddest picture of all, is to see educated, refined Southern gentleraen , the boasted " chivalry " of the slaveholding section, suffering, tolerating these barbarities as an instrumentality of war to reduce the power of their enemies ! . This is indeed, the saddest spectacle of the war. For this the South has been purged with fire. Passing through this agony, the slave States have come out of it, freed, emanci pated, disenthralled, and regenerated. The noble manhood of the South will be restored. On the dark clouds, which still envelope the Southern section of the Union, the bow of promise appears. That bow rests upon liberty. To return to Robert E. Lee. The personal misfortunes of such a man, the romance of his bravery as a soldier the charm of his personal manners, will not excuse the historian from recording the truth; that this man, gallant soldier as he was, had no loyalty to his flag, no regard for his oath, no lee's treason. 211 fidelity nor gratitude to his country, or his Chief; no human ity, nor good fellowship towards his corarades, to induce him to interfere to prevent their extermination by fearful cruelties while prisoners of war. He must go down to posterity as a deserter and a traitor. There were Southern loyahsts true and faithful, scorning all temptations addressed to their fidelity. Among others, in civil life, Were Andrew Johnson, and Andrew J. Harailton; in war, the glorious naraes of Generals Scott, George H. Thomas, Geo. G. Meade, and Admiral David G. Farragut. How do the names of Lee and Davis grow black jn con trast with that of the hero of Lundy's Lane, of Gettysburg, and of Nashville, and the blunt, but honest sailor, who so nobly and gloriously triumphed over traitors at New Orleans and Mobile. Shall we so teach our children? Shall we thus make up the record ? or are all moral distinctions to cease? Is treason odious? Shall truth, fidelity, and patriotism continue to be honored, and falsehood, perjury, and treachery scorned? Or is there no distinction between Andrew Johnson and Jefl'er son Davis; between General Scott and General Twiggs; between George H. Thomas and Robert E. Lee; between David G. Farragut and Raphael Semmes ? The forraer were faithful, the latter faithless ; the former kept their oaths, the latter broke them; the former shed their blood in heroic defense of their flag, and the latter deserted, and then made war upon it. Somebody will be held responsible for the suff'ering of this terrible war. Unrepentant rebels and traitors are consistent in holding the Federal Government responsible. Loyal raen cannot be consistent, in honoring Scott, Thomas, and Farragut, without conderaning Twiggs, Lee, and Davis. Of the officers who remained, a few were only half loyal. How -would such men — the Government seeking to hold the slave States of Kentucky, Maryland and Missouri — treat the negroes? The solution of this question was practically made, and the difficulties surrounding it, cut away by the clear, bold, 212 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. and direct mind of General Benjamin F. Butler, of Massa chusetts. He had been a pro-slavery Breckinridge democrat When his political friends at the South drew the sword, he, -without hesitation, drew his for his country, and against them ; and he was the first to lead a brigade to the defense of Washington. In May, General Butler found himself in command at Fortress Monroe. One evening three negroes came into his camp, saying, " they had fled from their master, Colonel Mal lory, who was about to set them to work on rebel fortifica tions!". If they had been Colonel Mallory's horses or mules, there could be no question as to what should be done with them. But so strangely deluded were the army officers, that up to that time, they had returned fugitive slaves to rebel masters, to work and fight for the rebel cause ! Would Butler continue the folly? He uttered the words, " These men are contraband of ivar!" This sentence, expressing an ob-vious truth, was more im portant than a battle- gained. It was a victory in the direction of emancipation, upon which the success of the Union cause was ultiraately to depend. He, of course, refused to surren der them, but set them at work on his own defenses. Up to this time, the South had fought to raaintain slavery, and the Government, for fear of offending Kentucky, and other border States, would not touch it. Strange as it may seem, a rebel officer had the presumption, under a flag of truce, to demand the return of these negroes, under the alleged Constitutional obligation to return fugitive slaves. General Butler, of course, refused, saying, " I shall retain the negroes as contra band of war! You are using them upon your batteries; it is merely a question whether they shall be used for or against us." Other Generals of the Union army, were very slow in recognizing this obvious truth. General McClellan, ou the 26th of May, issued an address to the people of his military district, in which he said, " Not only will we abstain from all interference with your slaves, but we will, on the contrary, with an iron hand, crush any attempt at insurrection on their part." DEATH OF DOUGLAS. 213 Early in June, the administration and the country, sus tained a great loss in the death of Douglas. He died at Chicago, on the 3d; his death, hastened by the zeal and en ergy he exerted to aid and strengthen the Government to meet the dangers surrounding it. Mr. Lincoln was deeply grieved by the death of his great rival, who had become one of his most valued advisers. Douglas had caused the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, and thereby precipitated the conflict between freedom and slavery; but for this repeal, probably the resort to arms might have been delayed for a generation; possibly by the influence of moral and peaceful agencies prevented ; but as has been stated, he did all in his power to redeem the past, by gi-^ing all his influence to the Government when the conflict came. The moment the flag of the insurgents was raised, he tried to hush the voice of party strife, and rallied his friends to the support of his country. He died at a mo ment when he had the opportunity and the disposition to have rendered the greatest service to his country. Had he lived, his energetic, determined, positive character would have continued him a leader, and there would have been no voice louder, raore emphatic than his, demanding prompt, vigorous, and decisive measures. The Nation will not forget him, and Illinois will cherish his memory, and as the early opponent, and later, the friend of Lincoln, his name will live as long as Lake Michigan shall roll her blue waves upon the shore where rest his remains. C H APTER X. EXTRA SESSION OP CONGRESS — CIVIL POLICY AND MILITARY EVENTS TO THE CLOSE OF 1861. Congress — ^^President's Message — Action op Congress — Ba ker's Reply to Breckenridge — Andrew Johnson — Denoun ces Davis — The Rebel Leaders — Prominent Senators, and Members — Sumner, Baker, Fessenden and Others — Ste phens, Colfax, Lovejoy and others — Bill to Confiscate THE Property and Free the Slaves of Rebels — The Army NOT to Return Fugitive Slaves — Crittenden's Resolution — Bull Run — McClellan in Command — Freemont — His Emancipation Order — Letter of Holt — President Mod ifies THE Order — His Reasons — Cameron's Instruction to Sherman in S. C. — Military Movements in the Fall of 1861 — Death op Lyon — Ball's Bluff — Death op Baker — Bel mont — The Trent Affair — Arrest op the Maryland Legislature. npHE special session of the 37th Congress met at the Capital -»- on fhe Fourth of July, agreeably to the call of the Pres ident. Hannibal Hamlin, Vice President, presided over the Sehate, Galusha A. Grow of Pennsylvania was elected Speaker of the House, and Emerson Etheridge of Tennessee, Clerk. In the Senate, twenty-three States, and in the House twen ty-two States were represented. There were forty Senators, and one hundred and fifty-four Representatives, on the first day of the session. No Representatives appeared from Vir ginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Al abama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, or Arkansas. An drew Johnson, " faithful among the faithless," represented Tennessee in the Senate, and Horace Maynard and Andrew 214 EXTRA SESSION OF CONGRESS. 215 J . Clements appeared and took their seats at the second ses sion, in the House. Among the more prominent Senators of New England, who had already secured a National rep utation, were Fessenden and Morrill of Maine, Hale and Clark of New Hampshire, Sumner and Wilson of Massachu setts, CoUamer and Foote of Vermont, and Anthony of Rhode Island. New York was represented by Preston King and Ira Harris. Mr. Hale, from New Hampshire, had been the leader of the old Liberty party. " Solitary and alone" in the United States Senate, by his wit and humor, his readiness and ability, he had maintained his position against the whole Senatorial delegation of the Slave States, and their numerous allies from the Free States. Frora Verraont, the dignified, urbane, and soraewhat formal, Solomon Foote ; his colleague was Jacob CoUamer, a gentleman of the old school who had been a raember of Cabinets, and was one of the wisest j urists and Statesmen of our Country. Preston King had been the friend and confidant of Silas Wright and Thomas H. Benton, and a leader at the Buffalo Convention ; genial, true and de voted to the principles of democracy as enunciated in the Declaration of Independence. From Pennsylvania, was Da vid Wilmot, who, while a member of the House, introduced the "Wilmot Proviso," which connects forever his name, with the Anti-Slavery contest. From Ohio, John Sherman, a brother of General Sher man, and late a distingi,iished Speaker of the House of Rep resentatives and Chairman ofthe Committee on Finance; and Benjamin Wade, staunch, rude, earnest and true. From Illinois, Lyman Trumbull and 0. H. Browning, both distinguished lawyers, and competitors at the bar with Douglas and Lincoln. From Iowa, Senators Grimes and Harlan ; from Wisconsin, Doolittle and Howe ; from Mich igan, Bingham and Chandler; from Indiana, Jesse D. Bright and Henry S. Lane; the latter of whom had presided over the Philadelphia Convention of 1856. But many vacant chairs in these council chambers, im pressed the spectator with the magnitude of the impending struggle. The old Chiefs of slavery were absent; some at 216 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Richmond, others in arms against their country. The chair of their leader, Davis ; that of the blustering Toombs ; the accomplished, cautious Hunter ; the polished Benjamin ; the haughty, pretentious Mason; the crafty, unscrupulous Slidell, and their compeers, were all vacant. The seat ofthe "Little Giant" of Illinois, the ambitious but true patriot, Douglas, was vacant — not, thank God, from treason, but by death. Life long opponents gazed sadly upon his unoccupied seat. Well had it been for the fame of Breckenridge if his chair had been made vacant by early death. But still conspicuous among the Senators of this Congress, was the late Vice Pres ident, now the Senator from Kentucky. As the representative of one of the historic families of that State, no young man of the Nation, until 1860, had prouder prospects. Entering into the conspiracy to divide the Union, he first permitted, as a preliminary step, his name to be used at Charleston, for the Presidency, to divide the Democratic party. He came to the United States Senate in July 1861, with no loyalty to the Union. He had on the 25th of April preceding, denounced the call of the President for troops, and advised, that in the event of the failure to arrest what he called coercion, Kentucky should unite with the South. He entered the Senate with the avowed deterraination to ar rest, if possible, the efforts of the Administration to protect and maintain the Government by force. He had now few friends or sympathizers in Washington, and was regarded with distrust by his loyal associates. Dark and gloomy, he could be daily seen, without companions, wending his way to the Senate Charaber, where his voice and his votes were con stantly exerted to thwart the raeasures inti-oduced for main taining the authority of the Constitution. He soon came to be looked upon as a spy as well as a traitor. It was obvious that his heart was with his old associates at Richmond. As soon as the special session closed, he threw off all dis guise, entered the Secession Camp, and joined his fortunes with the insurgents. , President Lincoln, in his message to this Congress, calmly re-dews the situation. He calls attention to the fact that at his inauguration, the functions of the Federal Government president's MESSAGE. 217 had been suspended in the States of Georgia, South Caro-' Una, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas and Florida. All the National property, in these States had been appro priated by the insurgents. They had seized all the forts, ar senals, &c., except those on the Florida coast, and Fort Sumter in Charleston harbor, and these were then iu a state of siege by the rebel forces. The National arms had been seiz ed and were in the hands of hostile armies. Large numbers of officers of the United States Army, and Navy, had resign ed and taken up arms against their Government. He review ed the facts in relation to Fort Sumter, and showed that by the attack upon it, the insurgents began the conflict of arms, thus forcing upon the country iraraediate dissolution or war. No choice was left but to call into action ihe war powers of the Govemment, and to resist the force eraployed for its destruc tion, by force for its preservation. The call for troops was made, and the response was most gratifying. Yet no slave State except Delaware, had given a regiment through State organization. He then reviewed the action of Virginia, in cluding the seizure of the National armory at Harper's Ferry and the Navy-yard at Gosport, near Norfolk. " The people of Virginia had permitted the insurrection to make its nest within her borders, and left the Government no choice but to deal with it, where it found it." He then reviews the ac tion of the Government, the calls for troops, the blockade of the ports in the rebellious States, and the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. He asked Congress to confer upon hira the power to make the conflict short and decisive. He asked to have placed at his disposal, 400,000 men, and 400 millions of money. Alluding to the . desire of the people to furnish the men and money necessary to raaintain the Union, he said, " the people will save their Government, if the Government itself will do its part only indifferently well." He calls attention to the fact, that ours is a Government of the people, and they appreciate it; that while large num bers of the officers of the army and navy had proved " false to the hand which had pamj)ered them, not one common soldier or common sailor is known to have deserted his flag." It is worthy of note, that the President in this, his first 218 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OE SLAVERY. message, as in so many of his speeches and State papers, calls attention to the great fundamental principle of our Govern ment, the eiiuality of all. He quotes the clause in the Decla ration of Independence, that " all men are created equal," and contrasted it with the aristocratic features of the Government, sought to be created on its ruins. Those who knew Mr. Lin coln best, knew that he looked, confidently, to the ultimate extinction of slavery. It is clear, that in accordance with his cautious character,' he hoped to destroy it by gradual emanci pation. From the beginning, he watched andgladly used every means whicli his prudent and scrupulous raind recognized as right and proper, to hasten its ultimate overthrow. Congress responded promptly to the call of the President, and voted 600,000 men, and 500 millions of dollars to suppress the insurrection. At this meraorable session. Congress coramenced a series of measures, which, in connection with the action of Presi dent Lincoln aud the victories of the Union arms, resulted in the downfall of African slavery. On the 4th of December, 1861, a resolution introduced by Senator Trumbull, unanimously passed the Senate, " That John C. Breckenridge, the traitor, be, and he hereby is, ex pelled." Some ofthe debates of this session, were of exceed ing interest. Among the most dramatic was a debate between Breckenridge, of Kentucky, and Colonel Baker, of Oregon. Breckenridge received from the fiery and eloquent Senator, a terrible rebuke for his treachery. Baker, iu a speech made on the 1st day of August, in reply to the treasonable utterances of Breckenridge, said : " What would the Senator from Kentucky, have? These speeches of his, sown hroadcast over the land, what clear distinct meaning have they? Are they not intended for disorganization in our very midst? Are they not intended to destroy our zeal ? Are they not intended to animate our enemies ? Sir, are they not words of brilliant polished treason, even in the very Capital of the Republic?" [Here there ¦were such manifestations of applause in the galleries, as were with difficulty suppressed.] • Mr. Baker resumed, and turning directly to Mr. Brecken ridge, enquired: baker's reply to BRECKINRIDGE. 219 " What would have been thought, if, in another Capital, in another Republic, in a yet more martial age, a Senator as grave, not more elo quent or dignified than the Senator from Kentucky, yet with the Ro man purple flowing over his shoulders, had risen in his place, sur rounded by all the illustrations of Roman glory, and declared that the cause of advancing Hannibal was just, and that Carthage ought to be dealt with in terms of peace ? What would have been thought if, after the battle of Cannae, a Senator there had risen in his place, and de nounced every levy of the Roman people, every expenditure of its trea sure, and every appeal to the old recollections and the old glories?" There was a silence so profound throughout the Senate aud galleries, that a pinfall could have been heard, while every eye was fixed upon Breckenridge. Fessenden exclaimed, in deep low tones, " he would have been hurled from the Tarpean Rock 1" Baker resumed: " Sir, a Senator, himself learned far more than myself, in such lore, ^Mr. Fessenden) tells me, in a voice that I am glad is audible, that ' he would have been hurled from the Tarpean Rock.' It is a grand commentary upon the American Constitution, that we permit these fvords of the Senator from Kentucky, to be uttered. I ask the Senator to recollect, too, what, save to send aid and comfort to the enemy, do these predictions amount to? Every word thus uttered, falls as a note of inspiration upon every Confederate ear. Every sound thus uttered, is a word, (and falling from his lips, a mighty word) of kindling and triumph to a foe that determines to advance." This was that Baker, brilliant alike as an orator and a sol dier, who, on the prairies of Illinois, had contested the palra of eloquence and popular favor with Lincoln and Douglas; he, who had gone to California, and pronounced the raemor- able funeral oration over the murdered Broderick, assassin ated because, as he said, " he was opposed to the extension of slavery and a corrupt administration." Going thence to Oregon, he came to Washington as its Senator. After a short and brilliant career in the Senate, he fell, pierced with nine bullets at Ball's Bluff, one of the early martyrs of the war, because, as he said, " a United States Senator must not retreat." 220 LINCOLN AND TJIE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. In conspicuous contrast with Breckenridge, stood Andrew Johnson, of Tennessee. Born in the humblest statioii, without the advantages of education, a man before he learned to read, yet his vigorous intellect and indomitable will soon raised him to distinction. In the winter of 1860-61, while all around him seemed treacherous and faithless, he stood firm, " faithful among the faithless." Confidence in his supposed firm integrity and unswerving patriotism were such, that a party with which he became associated only because it was identified with the cause of his country, generously offered him the second office in its gift. On the 2d day of March, 1861, in reply to Senator Lane, of Oregon, Johnson, turning to the party of conspirators, who still lingered in the Senate, exclaimed, " who is it, that has fired on our flag? Who has given instructions to take our arsenals and dock-yards, to sack mints, and steal custom houses? Those who have done this, have they not been guilty of treason? Show me who has been engaged in these conspiracies, who has fired on our fiag," said he, turning to wards the rebel Senators, "Who telegraphed to take our forts, dock-yards, mints, and armories? Show me who did this, and I will show you a traitor." This sentiment was received with applause by the galleries, crowded with Union men, Ihen present in Washington to witness the inauguration of Mr. Lincoln. Mr. Clingman called for the clearing of the galleries, but it was not insisted on. " If individuals were pointed out to rae," Johnson contin ued, " who were engaged in nightly conspiracies, in secret con claves, issuing orders, directing the capture of our forts, and the taking of our custom houses, I would show you the trai tors; and that being done, the persons pointed out, coming within the purview and scope of the Constitution, were I Pres ident, I would have done as Jefferson did with Aaron Burr — I would have arrested them, I would have caused them to be tried for treason, and if found guilty, by the Eternal God, I would execute them!" Such was the temper of Johnson, in 1861. He took his seat, the crowds in the galleries tried to repress their feelings, but they could not restrain themselves. First, a faint cheer from the ladies' gallery, then the clapping of a pair of fair hands — then one general, universal cheer, and ANDREW JOHNSON. 221 then three cheers for the Union, and three more for Andrew Johnson, shook the dome of the Senate Chamber. Johnson had zealously supported Breckenridge for Presi dent, and yet, when his treason was developed, he did not hesitate one moment, in denouncing the traitor. On the 27th of July, in a speech in reply to Breckenridge, after quoting a remark, that " when traitors become numer ous enough, treason becomes respectable." Yet, said he, " God being willing, whether traitors be many or few, as I have hitherto waged war against traitors and treason, I intend to continue it to the end." His denunciation of Jefferson Davis was vehement and severe. He said, " Davis — a man educated and nurtured by the Government, who sucked its pap, who received from it all his military instruction, a man who got all his distinction, civil and military, in the service of this Government, beneath its flag, and then -without cause, without being deprived of a single right or privilege — the sword he unsheathed in vindi cation of the stars and stripes in a foreign land, given to him by the hand of a cherishing mother, he stands this day, prepared to plunge into her bosom." Conspicuous among the body of able Senators frora New England, was Charles Sumner, with a reputation as an orator, a scholar, a philanthropist, extending beyond his own country. He was recognized as worthy to represent the best and nob lest, the most cultivated and purest manhood of Massachu setts. In intellect worthy to fill the place of Everett; in purity and learning, the worthy disciple of John Quincy Adams ; in singleness of purpose, in devotion to the broadest humanity and liberty for all, he was a worthy representative of those, who first taught the great Christian principle of the V common Father and the Universal brotherhood of man. He had experienced in his own person, the cowardly brutality and barbarism, the legitimate offspring of slavery. The same spirit which starved to death Union prisoners at Anderson ville, had sought to assassinate Sumner in the Senate Cham- bei". The bludgeon of Brooks and the pistol of Booth, were alike aimed by slavery. Providence directed that the life of Lincoln should be crowned by the death of a martyr, but 222 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. ^ had preserved Sumner to aid Lincoln in the great work of the emancipation of a race. The speeches of Sumner, up to this time, had one defect, they were overloaded with learning. The great thought was too often concealed under many quotations. In the earnest ness and gravity of the discussions during the war, this fault disappeared. His speeches, during the four years of Mr. Lincoln's , administration, illustrate our history, while influential in moulding and guiding public opinion. Among the more conservative of the New England Senar- tors, was Jacob CoUamer, of Vermont. He had held the position of Judge of the Supreme Court of that State, and had been Postmaster General under President Taylor. Dis tinguished for solid comraon sense, minutely familiar with his country's history and its laws, conscientious and self- poised, he exerted a commanding influence, and was alway.i listened to with profound respect. Senator Fessenden, Chairman of the Committee on Fi nance, and the successor of Mr. Chase, as Secretary of th« Treasury, was another very able and learned New England Senator. Ever ready, ever well informed, keen, witty and sarcastic; as a general debater he had no superior. He was one of the most practical and careful statesmen in the Senate. The House of Representatives of this memorable Congress, was composed generally, of men of good sense, respectable abilities,^ and of earnest patriotism, rather than of shining parts and high distinction. It represented and reflected the intelligence, integrity and patriotism of the American peo ple. This Congress early realized, that it had two great du ties towards which all its energies should be directed. These were to maintain the integrity of the Union, by subduing the rebellion, and extirpating its cause — African slavery. The leader of the House, Chairman of the Comraittee of Ways and Means, Thaddeus Stevens, of Pennsylvania, united the wisdora of three score years and ten, with the vigor and energy of twenty-five. He was the raost sarcastic, and witty, as well as the most eccentric member of the House. He waa respected alike by friend and foe, aud none desired a second encounter with him on the floor of the House. If he could STEVENS, COLFAX, MORRILL AND, DAWES. 223 not deraolish with an arguraent, he could annihilate with an epigrara or a sarcasm. Ready, adroit, and sagacious, as wel'. as bold and frank, he exerted a large influence upon tho House and the country. He was bitter and uncompromising, rather adapted to the position of leader of the opposition, than to conduct and control the majority. The most rising man in the House, was Schuyler Colfax, of Indiana, then in his fourth term, destined to be the Speaker of the House of Representatives during the Thirty-eighth and Thirty-ninth Congresses. Nature had given him an un tiring capacity for work, quicksighted tact, much coramon sense, great frankness, and greater kindliness. Often diff'er- ing from his political opponents, he never roused their anger by too strong statements, or too harsh an utterance; while those who knew him most, loved him best. Starting in life at the lowest point of a printing office, then an editor and publisher, he gave up business, after twenty years trial for politics, and became the representative man of his State. He has constantly improved since he entered Congress. Never an extreme radical in his views, yet he never wavers from his ideas of truth. Politics is now his profession, and no man better understands its secrets than Schuyler Colfax. As a parliamentarian, he had no superior in the House, and is one of the most rising statesmen of the West. Justin S. MorriU, of Vermont, the author of the Morrill tariff, was one of the most laborious men in Congress. Not brilliant, but so well inforraed, with such a fund of practical knowledge on the subjects of taxation, tariffs, and finance, that he was a raost useful member, and his influence upon all these subjects was very great. Henry L. Davies, of Massachusetts, occupied the important position of Chairman of the Committee on Elections. He was a man so perfectly just and fair; so candid and impartial, that he always comraanded the respect of all parties. He had all the information and accurate knowledge of the New Eng land gent eman. His State and section ever found in hira a most able and eloquent defender. His colleague, B. F. Thomas, represented the Quincy district. He was a fine scholar, and a very able man, but too much of a lawyer for a 224 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. statesman. He was cramped by technicalities, and became too conservative for Massachusetts, and retired. In the delegation from New York, were Roscoe Conklin, an able debater, and Abraham B. Olin, a leading meraber of the Committee on Military Affairs; Charles B. Sedgwick, Chairman of the Committee on Naval Affairs ; E. G. Spauld ing, a leading member of the Committee of Ways and Means ; and Reuben E. Fenton, subsequently Governor of that State, and Erastus Corning, the President of the New York Central Railroad. In the delegation from Pennsylvania, were Judge W. D. Kelly, an able debater, and an extreme radical ; John Hick man, James H. Campbell, Hendricks B. Wright, Edward McPherson, John Covode, James K. Morehead, and the Speaker, Mr. Grow. Frora Ohio, were Pendleton, Vallandighara, and Cox, leaders of the opposition, and James M. Ashley, and John A. Bingham, the latter one of the most ready, eloquent, and effective debaters in the House. From the State of Illinois, as supporters of the President, were Washburne, Lovejoy, Kellogg, and Arnold. Among those who had supported Douglas, were Richardson, McCler nand, and Logan. The two latter retiring after the special session and going into the army, became distinguished in the field. Among the members from Wisconsin, was John F. Pot ter, a radical abolitionist, and a resolute, true man. During the Thirty-sixth Congress, he accepted a challenge from Roger A. Pryor, of Virginia, but Pryor did not choose to fight the member from Wisconsin. Among the members known as anti-slavery men, the most widely distinguished, perhaps, was Owen Lovejoy, of Illinois. He was the brother of that Lovejoy, who fell a martyr to freedom and the liberty of the Press, at Alton, Illinois, twenty-five years before. After the death of his brother, 1 kneeling upon his grave, he swore eternal hostility to slavery, and solemnly dedicated himself to the anti-slavery cause. He was a man of powerful frame, strong feelii^gs, great per sonal magnetic power, and one of the most effective stump OWEN LOVEJOY. 225 speakers in the United States. As early as 1838, he aided in the organization of the Liberty party. He was by profession, a preacher of the Gospel, but he now went forth among the people, and with a tongue of fire, and a vehemence and pas sionate energy that ever carried the masses with him, spoke and preached against slavery. In the log school houses, the churches, on the open prairies, and in the groves of the West, he preached his crusade against slavery. His party grew and increased with each election. He was sent, first to the Illi nois Legislature, and then to Congress, and there, while slavery yet held control, he did not hesitate to beard the lion in his den. He had seen the rise and growth of the anti- slavery cause, from the time when its friends were mocked, mobbed, outraged, and every way abused, until increasing and gro-wing, it had become a power in tbe land; had elected a President, and now held control of both Houses of Congress. In February 1859, during his first term in Congress, in re ply to the furious denunciations of the slave holders, charg ing, among other things, upon the floor of Congress, that he was a "negro stealer" he indignantly and defiantly exclaimed ; ' ' Yes, I do assist fugitive slaves to escape ! Proclaim it upon the house-tops ; write it upon every leaf that trembles in the forest ; make it blaze from the sun at high noon, and shine forth in the radiance of every star that bedecks the firmament of Grod. Let it echo through all the arches of heaven, and reverberate and bellow through all the deep gorges of hell, where slave catchers will be very likely to hear it. Owen Lovejoy lives at) Princeton, Illinois, and he aids every fugitive that comes to his door and asks it. Thou invisible demon of slavery! dost thou think to cross my humble threshold, and forbid me to give bread to the hungry and shelter to the houseless ? I bid you defiance in the name of Grod." The first great measure of this Congress, looking to the slave question, was a bill reported by Senator Trumbull, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, to confiscate all prop erty, and free all slaves used for insurrectionary purposes. Mr. Breckinridge vehemently opposed the bill, and stated that it was one of a series of measures which would amount to the " loosening of all bonds." 15 226 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Senators justified their vote for the bill, on the ground, that in the battle of Bull Run, fought on Sunday, July 21, the rebels had used the negroes and slaves in battle against the Union army. The bill passed the Senate by thirty-three to six. In the House of Representatives Mr. Burnett, of Kentucky, a member who joined the rebel army, iramediate ly after the adjournment of Congress, declared that the bill would amount to a wholesale emancipation of the slaves in the rebellious States. Mr. Cox of Ohio, opposed the bill. Thaddeus Stevens, Chairman of the committee of Ways and Means, ably advocated it. He said : " I warn Southern gentlemen, that if this war continues, there will be a time when it will be declared by this free nation, that every bond man in the South, belonging to a rebel, (recollect, I confine it to them,) shall be called upon to aid us in war against their masters, and to restore the Union.'' On the third of August the bill passed. It is a reraark able fact, how reluctantly members touched slavery, and in dicates how slowly the public mind came to the conclusion that the surest way to destroy the rebellion, was to destroy slavery. Sorae of the best and raost patriotic men in Congress, voted against this bill ; among them Messrs. Bai ley, Crittenden, Diven, Haight, Hale, Odell, McPherson, Rol lins and others. From the beginning of the contest, the slaves flocked to the Union army, as to a haven of refuge. They believed freedom was to be found within its picket lines, and under the shelter of its flag. They were ready to act as guides, to dig, to work, to fight for liberty. The Yankees, as their masters called the Union troops, were believed by thera, to come as their dehverers from long and cruel bondage. And yet, al most incredible as it raay now seem, many officers permitted masters and agents to enter their lines and carry away, by force, these fugitive slaves. Many cruelties and outrages were perpetrated by these masters, and in many instances, the colored men, who had rendered valuable ser-yice to the Union cause, were permitted to be carried from beneath the flag of the Union back to bondage. SLAVERY IN THE BORDER STATES. 227 Lovejoy was raost indignant at this stupid and inhuman treatment, and early in the special session, introduced a res olution declaring that it was no part of the ,,duty of the sol diers of the United States, to capture and return fugitive slaves. This passed the House by the very large majority of ayes ninety three, nays fifty nine. In the Senate, Mr. Powell of Kentucky, proposed to amend the Army Bill, by providing that no part of the army should be employed "in subjugating or holding, as a conquered province, any sovereign State, or in freeing any slave." The amendment was rejected. Senators from the slave holding States were advised that slavery would not survive, in any State, the march of Union armies. There were, in the border States, many Union men who desired to maintain the Union, and wished, also, that there raight be no interference with the institution of slavery. These raen, -with the small band of anti-slavery men in Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri had rendered efficient aid in preventing those States from seceding. Their representa tive man in Congress was the aged, venerable, and eloquent John J. Crittenden of Kentucky. He had been the confi dential friend and colleague of Clay, and had never faltered in his loyalty to the Union. He had been conspicuous iu the session of the Thirty-sixth Congress, in attempting to bring about terms of compromise, to prevent the threatened war. On the 15th of July, on motion of General John A. Mc Clernand, the House, by a vote of one hundred and twenty- one, to five, adopted a resolution, pledging itself to vote any amount of money and any number of men, which might be necessary to ensure a speedy and effectual suppression of the rebellion. On the 22d of July 1861, Mr. Crittenden offered the fol lowing resolution, defining the object of the war : ^^ Resolved, That the present deplorable civil war has been forced upon the country, by the disunionists of the Southern States, now in revolt against the Constitutional Government, and in arms, around the Capital; that, in this National emergency Congress, banishing all feel ing of mere passion or resentment, will recollect only its duty to the 228 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. whole country ; that this war is not waged, upon our part, in any spirit of oppression, nor for any purpose of conquest, or subjugation, nor purpose of overthrowing or interfering with the rights or estab hshed institutions of those States ; but to defend and maintain the su premacy of the Constitution, and to preserve the Union, with all the dignity, equality and rights of the several States unimpaired ; that as soon as these objects are accomplished, the war ought to cease." It was adopted by the House, there being only two dissent ing votes. It served to allay the apprehensions of the bor der States, whose sensitiveness had been excited by the agents and abettors of the rebellion. The special session of Congress, confined its action to measures connected with the war, and did comparatively lit tle in the way of general legislation. After long debate, it sanctioned the acts of President Lincoln, and voted more than all the men and means he had called for to suppress the insurrection. Its anti-slavery action was confined to a rebuke of the army officers, for returning fugitive slaves ; and the agitation and passage of the bill, confiscating the property, and freeing slaves employed to aid in the rebellion. This became a law on the 6th of August, and was the first in that series of measures, which resulted in the language of Breck inridge, in "loosening all bonds." But the discussions which occurred on the floor of tho Capitol, contributed largely, to the formation of that public sentiment, which resulted in the final overthrow of slavery by the President's Proclamation of Emancipation. The way was being prepared. One of the most meraorable speeches of this session, dis tinguished alike for its eloquence, boldness and sagacity, was that of Senator Baker, on a resolution approving the acts of President Lincoln, in calling out men, in raising an army, suspending the writ of Habeas Corpu,s, and other acts to suppress the insurrection. He said : " As a personal and political friend of the President, I approve of every measure of his administration, in relation to the troubles of the country. I propose to ratify whatever needs ratification. I propose to render my clear and distinct approval, not only of the measure, but SENATOR BAKER. 229 of the motive which prompted it. I propose to lend the whole power of the country — arms, men, money, and place them in his hands, with authority, ahnost unlimited, until the conclusion of this struggle. He has asked Ibr $400,000,000. We propose to give hun $500,000,000 He has asked for four hundred thousand men. We propose to give him half a million, and for my part, if, as I do not apprehend, the emergency should still be greater, I will cheerfully add a cipher to either of these figures. "But, sir, while I do that, I desire by my word and my vote, to have it clearly iinderstood, that I do that as a measure of war. As I had occasion to say in a very early discussion of this question, I want sud den, bold, forward, determined war. I do not think any body can conduct one of that kind, as well as a dictator. But, as a Senator, I deem it my duty to look forward to returning peace. I do not beUeve it will be longer than next February. " Till danger's troubled night is o'er. And the star of peace returns." ' Whether that peace shall be conquered at Richmond, or Montgom ery, or New Orleans, or in the wilds of Texas, I do not presume to say; but I do know, if I may use so bold a word, that the determined aggregated power of the whole people of this country — all its treasure, all its arms, all its blood, all its enthusiasm kindled, concentrated, poured out, in one mass of living valor, upon any foe, will conquer. "1 believe, with most gentlemen, that the Union sentiment will yet prevail in the Southern States. Bayonets are sharp remedies, but they are very powerful. I am one of those who believe that there may be reverses. I am not quite confident that we shall overrun the Southern States, as we shall have to overrun them, without severe trials of our courage and our patience. I believe they are a brave, determined people, filled with enthusiasm, false in its purposes, as I think, but still, one which animates almost all classes of their population. But however that may be, it may be that instead of finding within a year, loyal States sending members to Congress, and replacing their Senators upon this floor, we may have to reduce them to the condition of terri tories, and send from Massachusetts, or from Illinois, Governors to con- trof them. It may he ; and sir, if need come, I am one of those who would be willing to do it. I would do that ; I would risk, even the stigma of being despotic and oppressive, rather than risk the perpetu ity ofthe Union of these States. I repeat, and with that repetition I close. Fight the war through ; accomplish a peace ; make it so per fect and so permanent, that a boy may preserve it ; and when you have done that, you have no more need for a standing army." 230 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. The right of the President to increase the regular Array, and to suspend the Habeas Corpus were gravely questioned. Indeed, so far as relates to the right to increase the regular Army, Mr. Lincoln himself, regarded it as an act called out by imperious necessity, and requiring the sanction of Con gress to legalize. Mr. Sherman of Ohio, said : " I believe that the President had the right, and that it was his duty to issue the Proclamation of April last. I believe he had a right; it ¦was a part of the power of suppressing an insurrection, to blockade the ports of the States, or any of them. I do not believe the President of the United States, has the power to suspend the writ oi Habeas Corpus, because that power is expressly given by the Constitution to Con gress and to Congress alone ; and therefore I cannot vote for either of the last three propositions — the fourth, the fifth or the sixth. Still, I approve of the action of the President. I believe the President did right. He did precisely what I would have done if I had been in his place ; no more, no less ; but I cannot, here, in my place as a Sen ator under oath, declare that what he did, was legal. I may say it was proper, and was justified by the necessity of the case ; but, I cannot, here, in my place, under oath, declare that it was strictly legal, and in consonance with the provisions of the Constitution. I shall, therefore, be compelled to vote against the resolution." Congress by large majorities, both in the Senate, and in the House legalized and approved, of all the acts, proclara ations and orders of the President, respecting the Array and Navy, and calling out the militia and enrolling volunteers.* There had, up to July, already gathered to the standard of the Union, many more men than the number mentioned in the President's call. These troops held Fortress Monroe and vicinity ; garrisoned Baltimore, guarded the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad and other roads leading to the Capital, besides which, there were at Washington some 30,000 troops. A force under General George B. McClellan were driving \he rebels out of West Virginia. The insurgents, under Beaure gard, confronted the troops near the Capital, with an equal, if not superior force, holding a position along Bull Run Creek ; their right resting on Manassas, and their left at *Aot of August 5, 1861. BULL RUN. 231 Winchester, under General Johnston. It was determined to attack this force, and the Union army under General Mc Dowell, left its camps near the Potomac on the 16th of July, and attacked the enemy on the 21st. The attack was skill fully planned, and was at first successful, until reinforcements under Johnson arriving opportunely, at the crisis of the bat tie, saved the insurgents from a defeat, and enabled them to repulse the Union troops and drive them back from the base of the Blue Ridge, to the defences of Washington. There never was a more mortifying defeat than that sustained by the National forces at Bull Run. It took the people com- pletelj' Isy surprise. They, and the Union soldiers had not appreciated the strength and magnitude of the rebellion, nor the fierce vigor with which the rebels would fight. With this battle, commenced the exhibition of those, fe rocious cruelties and barbarities, which, to a great extent, characterized the insurgents during the war. There was a hatred and ferocity on the part of the rebels towards the Union soldiers, scarcely paralleled, and which was in striking contrast to the conciliatory feelings of the loyalists towards the rebels. The latter robbed and mutilated the dead upon the battle field, and wore the bones of the fallen as personal ornaments. These things it were well to forget, except that they illustrate the barbarism produced by slavery, and there fore, the truth of history demands their record. The slave holders have ceased to exist, because slavery has been des troyed, but as a beacon and a warning, the real character of the men produced by this institution, should be truthfully de scribed. The public mind was learning to recognize the re bellion as slavery in arms. It was advancing towards that position in which slavery was to be attacked directly. But yet, the Country, the Army and the President hesitated. Much has been said by the Press, about this battle being forced upon the military authorities by the President, who, it was asserted, had been influenced by popular clamor and the cry of "On to Richmond." It was said that General Scott was forced to fight this battle before he was ready. It is true, the cry of "On to Richmond" was very general, but it is known, that when General Johnston had escaped from 232 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. General Patterson, and was marching to join Beauregard, President Lincoln suggested to General Scott, the propriety of delaying until Patterson's corps could co-operate -with the Union army at Centreville. General Cameron, Secretary of War, returned from the field on Saturday before the battle, and urged the sending of re-inforcements ; and five regiments were started towards Bull Run but did not reach there in time to participate in the engagement. The disaster of Bull Run, mortified the National vanity and pride, but aroused also the National spirit and courage. The morning following the defeat, witnessed dispatches flash ing over the wires to every part of the North, authorizing the reception of the eager regiments, ready to enter the service and retrieve the results of the battle. The Administration and the people, immediately they learned of the loss of this battle, set themselves vigorously to increase and re-organ ize the army. Grave and thoughtful men left their private pursuits and organized regiraents, and offered them to the Government. None were now refused. The popular feeling through the loyal States again rose to an extent even greater and deeper than that which followed the attack upon Fort Sumter. Perhaps there is no more striking and curious exhibition of it, than was shown in the devices and inscriptions upon the. envelopes of letters passing through the post-office, among the masses ofthe people and the soldiers. Every envelope had engraved upon it, in rude wood-cuts or steel, some patri otic emblem, motto, or the head of some popular leader or General. The heads most frequently thus honored, at this time, were those of Washington, Scott, Lincoln, Lyon, Ells worth, Douglas, McClellan, Anderson, Foote, Grant, Fre mont, Rosecrans and Dix. The Flag, the Eagle, the Nation al Arms, Liberty, the Temple of Freedom, the Capitol, and Mt. Vernon, were among the emblems engraved. Mottoes expressing devotion to the Union, to liberty, to loyalty, were almost universally printed on the envelopes : such as "Lib erty or death ;" " Liberty and Union;" " We have beat our last retreat ;" " Victory or death ;" " Death to Traitors ;" " Strike till the last armed foe expires ;" " One people and POPULAR FEELING AFTER BULL RUN. 233 one Governraent frora ocean to ocean, frora the Lakes to the Gulf;" Remember Ellsworth;" "Not a star shall fall ;" " Our hearts are with the heroes who defend our glorious flag;" "Fear not, Abraham, I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward;" "Death to Slavery;" "Down with the slave-holders;" " We are coming, Father Abraham, Six hundred thousand more !" These, and hundreds of others gave expression to the deep and all pervading feelings of the people. Expeditions were organized and sent to the south, and Fort Hatteras was surrendered to the Union troops on the 28th August. On the 31st of October Port Royal came into possess ion of the Union army. The rebels were driven out of West Virginia, and General George B. McCleUan, who had been in command there, and who was believed at the time, to pos sess military ability of a high order, was called to command the armies again gathering in vast numbers around the Cap ital. In October, General Scott retired on account of age and infirmity, and General McClellan was appointed to the com mand. The policy governing the Administration as announc ed on the close ofthe special session of Congress by the Secre tary of War, was to receive all fugitive slaves, as well from loyal as disloyal masters, and employ them in the service of the United States, under such ' organizations" and in such " occu pations" as might be most convenient. The troops, however, were not permitted to interfere with the servants of peaceful citizens, nor were they to be permitted to encourage such servants to leave their masters, nor was the army to prevent the voluntary return of slaves. Slavery was still tenderly treated. The superstitious regard for it, which pervaded the Nation, as if the Union was in some mysterious way, bound up with the institution, still lingered. The question was not, as in stern war, how can most destruction be dealt to the slave holder, as the enemy of the Country? but rather, how can the country carry on war, and do the institution the least harm ? But war is a stern and rapid teacher, and these long cherished notions, were fast disappearing before the roar of rebel guns and the flash of rebel swords. 234 LINCOLN AND THE OVBRTHRCW OF SLAVERY. John C. Fremont was abroad, at Paris, at the breaking out of the rebellion. This ardent soldier, whose adventures, in tracing a route across the Continent for the Pacific Rail way, had given him the name ofthe "Path-finder," had long been the object of romantic admiration, on the part of. the American people. He had been the candidate of the Repub licans for the Presidenc}' in 1856, and he was, for a time, a popular idol among a large portion of the people. He has tened home and offered his sword to the Government. He was immediately appointed a Major General, and given command of the Western Department, embracing Missouri and a part of Kentucky. On the 31st of August, he issued an order declaring martial law throughout the State of Mis souri, and declaring that the property, real and personal, of all persons in that State, who should take up arms against the United States, or who should be proved to have taken an active part with their enemies in the field, "is declared con fiscated to the public use, and iheir slaves, if any they have, are hereby declared free." At this time, the contest in Kentucky, between the traitors and Unionists, was of doubtful result. The order went far beyond the act of Congress, which, up to this time, freed such slaves only as were used for insurrectionary purposes, or in aid of the rebellion. It was not in accordance with the instructions of the Secretary of War. It was clearly compe tent for the President, under the war power, and independent of the act of Congress, to issue such an order ; but he was not prepared as yet to take such a step, aud it was more proper, when taken, that it should emanate from the Presi dent, as the Commander-in-Chief, than from a subordinate, and apply, generally, throughout the States in rebellion. The order, however, was hailed with enthusiastic delight by im pulsive and ardent patriots throughout the Union. Even the New York Herald approved it. But it tended seriously to embarrass the Executive, in his eftbrts to retain Maryland and Kentucky in the Union. The spirit in which it was re ceived in Kentucky, appears frora a letter of Hon. Joseph Holt to the President. After pointing out the violation of the act of Congress, he says : JOSEPH HOLT TO THE PRESIDENT. 235 " You may judge of the alarm and condemnation with which the Union loving citizens of Kentucky have received this proclamation. The hope is earnestly indulged by them, as it is by myself, that this paper was issued under the pressure of military necessity, which Gen eral Fremont believed justified the step; but that in the pauticulars specified, it has not your approbation, and will not be enforced in dero gation of law. The magnitude of the interest at stake, and my ex treme desire that by no misapprehension ofyour sentiments or purpos es, shall the power and fervor of the loyalty of Kentucky be at this moment abated or chilled, must be my apology for the frankness with which I have addressed you, and for the request I venture to make, of an expression of your views upon the points of General Fremont's proclamation, on which I have commented. The President, after mature deliberation, requested Gen eral Fremont to modify this order ; but on the General's ex pressing a preference that the President should himself do so, Mr. Lincoln issued an order, modifying the proclamation of Fremont so far as to make it conform to the act of Congress. Even this modification subjected the President to rauch censure ; but his own explanation of his modification of this order contains a complete vindication of his conduct. He "When, early in the war. General 1 remont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not think it au indispensable necessity. When a little later. General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected,beoause I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When still later. General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I again forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March and May and July, 1862, 1 made earnest, and successive appeals to the border States, to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for mili tary emancipation, and arming the blacks, would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition, and I was, in my best Judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hands upon tlie colored element. I chose the latter. In choos ing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss, but of this I was not entirely confident. More than a year of trial now shows ho loss by it in our foreign relations, none in our home popular sentiment, none in our white railitary force — no loss by it anyhow or anywhere. On the contrary, it shows a gain of quite a hundred and thirty thousand soldiers, seamen and laborers. These are palpable facts, about which, as facts, there can be no caviling. We have the men, and we could not have had them without the measure. And now, let any Union man who complains of this measure, test himse-;f by -writing down in one line, that he is for subduing the rebellion by force of arms ; and iu the next, that he is for taking these one hundred and thirty thousand men from the Union side, and placing them where they would be best for the measuije he condemns. If he cannot face his case so stated, it is only because he cannot face the truth. 236 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. I add a word which was not in the verbal conversation. In teUing this tale, I attempt no compliment to my own sagacity. I claim not to have controUed events, but confess plainly, that events have controlled me. Now, at the end of three years' struggle, the Nation's condition is not what either party or any man desired or expected. God alone can claim it. -Whither it is tending seems plain. If God now wiUs the removal of a great wrong, and wills also that we of the North, as well as you of the South, shaU pay fairly for our complicity in that wrong, impartial history will flnd therein new causes to attest and revere-the Justice and goodness of God. From this time, strenuous efforts werfe being constantly made to induce the President to abandon what was called the "border State policy," and to proclaim universal eman cipation of all the slaves, and also to arm and employ them as soldiers against the rebellion. A step towards this policy, and another step towards emancipation was taken October 14, 1861, by the orders issued by General Cameron, as Secretary of War, to Gen eral Sherman, then about to assurae command in South Carolina. The following extract shows its character : You will however, in general, avail yourself of the services of any persons, whether fugitives from labor or not, who may offer themselves to the National Gov ernment. You will employ such persons in such services as they may be fitted for, either as ordinary employees, or, if. "special" [the word special InterUned by President Lincoln, and in his own handwriting,] circumstances seem to require it, in any other capacity, with such organization in squads, companies or other wise, as you may deem most beneficial to the service. [" This however not to mean a general arming of them for military service."*] You will assure all loyal masters, that Congress will provide just compensation to them for the loss of the services of the persons so employed. And you will assure all persons held to involuntary labor, who may be thus received into the service of the Government, that they will, under no circumstances, be again reduced to their former condi tion, unless at the expiration of their respective terms of service, they freely choose to return to the service of their former masters. It is beUeved that the course thus indicated, will best secure the substantial rights of loyal masters, and the proper benefits to the United States, of the services of all disposed to support the Government, while it will avoid all inter ference with the social systems or local institutions of every State, beyond that wbich insurrection makes unavoidable, and which a restoration of peaceful relations to the Union under the Constitution, will immediately remove.f This was the first authority conferred upon any commander to avail himself of the services of fugitives from labor, and authorizing their organization into "squads, companies or otherwise, as might be most beneficial to the service." * This sentence interlined by the President. ¦jTaken from the original draft, with the President's Interlineation, In possession 3f Mr. Cameron. ARMINa NEGROES AS SOLDIERS. 237 It was the inauguration of the policy of arming the colored men, and was a most memorable event in the progress of that history, which placed nearly two hundred thousand colored men in the service of the United States. The sensi tiveness of the public mind appears by the peculiar terms of the order, and especially by the words interlined by President Lincoln, qualifying the order, and disclaiming the idea that this was to "mean a general arming of them for military service." It undoubtedly was the meaning and intention of the Secretary of War, except for such qualification, that there should be a general arming for military service, as private orders were given by General Cameron to General Sherman, to take with hira to South Carolina ten thousand extra muskets. The execution of this order necessarily involved emancipation. It was submitted to the President, and re ceived his careful consideration and deliberate sanction, and it was peculiarly appropriate that as the rebellion had its origin in South Carolina, the policy of emancipation should be inaugurated there. In the meantime, what had been the progress of the Union arms? The disastrous battle of Bull Run occurred on the 2l8t of July. The administration, as has been stated, mani fested the utmost vigor in reorganizing and enlarging the arraies. It now adopted the policy of placing at the head of the armies, young, ambitious and active men, and those who fully possessed the confidence of the people. On the 25th of July, General Fremont had assumed com raand of the Department of the West. General N. P. Banks reached Harpers' Ferry, relieving General Patterson, by whose tardy raovements. General Johnson was enabled to reinforce Beauregard on the battle-field of Bull Run, and snatch victory from McDowell ; and on that day, General George B. McClellan assumed command ofthe Army ofthe Potomac. The command in West Virginia was given to General Rosecrans, who had gained distinguished reputation at Rich Mountain. For the next ensuing three months, the greatest activity prevailed, in organizing the Army of the Potomac. In the 238 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Autumn, it had reached fully 200,000 men. Previous to the arrival of General Fremont in Missouri, the Union force had, under the gallant leadership of Generals Lyon and Sigel, greatly aided by the boldness, activity and prompt de cision of Colonel Frank P. Blair, Jr., maintained the ascend- - , ency of the Union cause, and driven the rebels far towards the Southwest. The heroic Lyon fell at the battle of Wilson's Creek, while bravely leading a charge, and his loss to the Union cause was irreparable. More than any other, at that early day, he seems to have appreciated the magnitude ofthe rebellion. His action in Missouri was, frora the first, prompt and bold. Modest, brave, rapid and decided, he left few equals. He ought to have been better supported. General Franz Sigel, a gallant German soldier, rallied the Germans of St. Louis, organised them into regiments, and rendered efficient service in maintaining in Missouri the Union supremacy. It will be remembered that citizens of Illinois, scarcely waiting the action of the Government, had, on the opening of hostilities, promptly seized and held the very important strategic point of Cairo. This is the terraination of the Illinois Central Railroad, at the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, and is the key to the navigation of both. Such occupation was not too soon. Here began to be con centrated a very considerable force, and here came, very soon, the regiments of Colonels U. S. Grant, John A. Mc Clernand, Palmer, B. M. Prentiss, Richard J. Oglesby, Paine, Wallace and others, whose names emblazon the records of Illinois. Commodore A. H. Foot, in August, assumed command of the naval forces being organized on the Western waters. The insurgent General Sterling Price, Governor Jackson, and Ben. McCullough, of Texas, were very actively engaged in movements to overrun and hold Missouri. On the 12th of September, Price attacked, with overwhelming numbers, the heroic Colonel Mulligan at Lex ington, and notwithstanding a most gallant defense, com pelled his surrender. As Fremont, in command in Missouri, was pursuing Price with a confident belief of overtaking and crushing him, he was, on the 2d day of November, relieved BALLS BLUFF. 239 of his command. General Fremont was the victira of in discreet friends, df military jealousy, and political opposition. General Hunter, who temporarily relieved him, withdrew from the further pursuit of Price, in accordance with suggestions or orders from Washington. On the 29th of August, General Butler, acting in conjunc tion with a naval force under Commodore Stringham, cap tured and took possession of the forts at Cape Hatteras, taking near seven hundred prisoners, guns, and a large araount of material of war. General McClellan had organized, armed and drilled the iramense army which had gathered around Washington; but as time passed on, and this great force remained inactive, shut up in the defenses of the Capital, the Potomac closed, and the rebel fiag in view from the National Capitol, great impatience was felt at the inactivity of this army. Sensible men early perceived, that while in men, material of war and resources, we were greatly superior to the rebels, this inac tivity was exhausting our resources, and that under it the Union cause was losing prestige ; and the National spirit chafed and fretted against the humiliating spectacle of an army, 200,000 strong, permitting itself tc be shut up, and almost in a state of siege. On the 21st of October, occurred the sad butchery of Ball's Bluff; evidently a blunder and a sacrifice, for which McClel lan was responsible. At this battle fell the eloquent and brave Senator from Oregon, Colonel Baker. In the light of subsequent events, it is most clear that this blunder phould have caused the removal of McClellan. Had the President then relieved hira, and could he have found a Grant, a Sheri dan or a Sherman, to have placed in command, what myriads of lives might have been saved ! But McClellan had enjoyed the confidence of Scott, and Mr. Lincoln having given him his confidence, was very slow to withdraw it. If he had remembered that McClellan had been a favorite 01 Jefferson Davis, while the latter was Secretary of War — that he had been sent by hira to the Crimea, to learn, from the Armies of France, Great Britain and Russia, how tc fight, and that his early political associations had been witt ,240 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the leaders of the rebellion and their sympathizers in the North — he would, perhaps, have been more slow in yielding his confidence, and more prompt in relieving him from command. On the 16th of November, a force under Generals Grant and McClernand, advanced from Cairo to Belmont, attacked the rebel camp under General Cheatham, captured twelve guns, burned the camp, and took many prisoners. The gun boats Tyler .and Lexington accompanied the expedition, and rendered efficient aid. A few months after this battle, there came to Washington a fine, intelligent, young man, of pleasing address and manly bearing, who had lost his right arm at Belmont. He carae highly recommended to ask the position of assistant com missary of subsistence, with the rank of captain. The Se cretary of War, owing to some misapprehension, treated him with some rudeness, whereupon the Member of Congress by whom he was presented took him to the President. Upon his being introduced, Mr. Lincoln, glancing at the eloquent, empty sleeve, said : "My friend, can you write." "0 yes," said the young soldier, "here is some of ray writing." Look ing at it, Mr. Lincoln instantly directed his appointraent. "It is little I can do for you, to repay you for the loss of that arm,' said he, "but I gladly do this." No wounded soldier ever approached Mr. Lincoln but he was received with the greatest kindness and friendship. On the 10th of November, General Halleck assumed command of the Department of the West. On the 8th of November, Commodore Wilkes, in the San Jacinto, intercepted the Trent, a British mail stearaer frora Havana, with Messrs. Mason and Slidell, late Senators, and then rebel agents ou their way to represent the Confederacy at the Courts of St. James and St. Cloud. He took them prisoners, and bringing them to the United States, they were confined at Fort Warren, in Boston harbor. The impulse of the people, already indignant at the con duct of Great Britain, exasperated by her early recognition of the rebels as belligerents, was to adopt, and take the con sequences of an act which gratified popular passion and pride. THE TRENT AFFAIR. 241 Congress was in session, and the House of Representatives, on motion of Lovejoy, immediately adopted a resolution of thanks to Captain Wilkes. Fortunately, the President and Secretary of State were cool and reticent, and did not yield to the passion of the day. Great Britain demanded their release. The President and Secretary carefully examined the precedents. Were Mason and Slidell "contraband of war?" If so, was the method of their capture justifiable ? Resistance to the right of search had been one chief cause of the war with Great Britain in 1812. "One war at a time," said Mr. Lincoln. Mr. Seward concluded the argument of one of the ablest and most remarkable State papers of modern times in these words : " If I decide this case in favor of my own Govern ment, I must disavow its most cherished principles, and reverse and forever abandon its essential policy. The country cannot afford the sacrifice. If I maintain those principles, and "adhere to that policy, I must surrender the case itself" The rebel emissaries were cheerfully surrendered to Great Britain. Had President Lincoln, yielding to popular clamor, accept ed the challenge of Great Britain and gone to war, he would have done exactly what the rebels desired, and thus made Messrs. Mason and Slidell incomparably more useful to the insurgents than they were able to be by hanging around the courts to which they were accredited. The sober second thought of the public cheerfully acquiesced in the course which their judgments approved. The Confederate Government had relied with great confi dence on its earfy recognition by the great powers of Europe, and the immediate concession to them of belligerent rights, encouraged them in this expectation. The leaders of the re bellion had been, to a great extent, the governing power at Washington, and there is no doubt, had received before the war opened, the encouragement of the representatives of European Kingdoms. The Confederates, therefore, rather rejoiced in the seizure of Slidell and Mason, believing it would bring on a war with Great Britain, and their „owd 16 242 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. recognition. But Mr. Lincoln, with the sagacity which marked his career as a statesman, determined that so long as there was no recognition of the rebels as a nation, not to bring on a war. " One war at a time," said he. It is known that Lord Palraerston, and it is believed that several other of the British Statesmen, desired to fight the United States in regard to the Trent affair. It is known that France would have followed Great Britian in recognizing the Confederacy. A war with France and England, and with the rebels at the same time, would have taxed the power and resolution of the loyal people of the Uuited States to the utmost. But it would have inspired an energy and an earn- nestness, that was long wanting in the conduct of the war on our " Southern brethren." The failure of Mr. Buchanan's administration to arrest per sons known to be plotting treason, has caused some merabers of that administration to be regarded as particeps criminis in the civil war which followed. Mr. Lincoln's administration was slow in making such arrests; but as its absolute neces sity became clearly apparent, the writ of habeas corpus was suspended, the power was executed. George P. Kane, Chief of Police of Baltimore, the Mayor and Police Commissioners of that city, the Mayor of Wash ington, and many others were arrested; but more important than all, was the arrest of the Legislature of Maryland. The majority of the Legislature of Maryland were seces sionists. The Executive, and a majority of people, were for the Union. Several of the insurgent States had been pre cipitated into hostilities by the Legislature passing acts or Ordinances of secession. ^ In September, 1861, the Secretary of War received infor mation that the insurgents in Maryland, were to procure the passage by the Legislature of that State, of an act of seces sion, and he issued an order to General McClellan to prevent it, by the arrest of all, or any part of the merabers thereof Directions were issued by General McClellan to General Banks, to execute this order. In his instructions, dated Septeraber 12th, General McClellan says: ARREST OF MARYLAND LEGISLATURE. 248 Some four or five of the chief men In the afl-air are to be arrested to-day. -When they meet on the 17th, you wUl please have everything prepared to arrest the whole party, and be sure that none escape. * * If successfully carried out, It will go far towards b^'eoMng the back-bone of the rebellion. * * I have/ but one thing to impress upon you ; the absolute necessity of secresy and success. The order was successfully executed; the meeting of the Legislature broken up, and Maryland saved from a civil war among her own citizens. This act has been censured as an arbitrary arrest. How ever arbitrary, it was a nece^ssary measure, and in the propriety of which General McClellan fully coincided. Governor Hicks, said in the Senate of United States, " I beheve that arrests, and arrests alone, saved the State of Maryland from destruction. I approved them then, and I approve them now." OHAPTEE XI, SECOND SESSION, THIRTY-SE-VENTH CONGRESS — CONGRESS OF 1862. President's Message — Eeport op Secretary op War — Modi fied BY THE President — Stanton succeeds Cameron — Anti-Slavery Measures — Article op War Prohibiting the Return op Fugitive Slaves — Slavery Abolished at the Capital — Prohibited in all the Territories — Negro Soldiers — Military Orders in Eegard to Slaves — Hun ter's Negro Eegiments in South Carolina — Wicklippe's EESoLurioN — Hunter's Eeply — Bill to Give Freedom to THE Families op Negro Soldiers. CONGRESS assembled at its regular session, December 2d, 1861, and found tfie grand drama of rebellion fully opened and developed. Two hundred thousand Union troops on the banks of the Potomac, confronted a rebel army then supposed to be of equal numbers, but now known to have been far less. The magnitude of the American rebellion, and the principles involved, had attracted the attention of the world, which was watching with deep interest the pro gress of events. The common people, the lovers of liberty and free institutions, were hopeful, yet anxious for the issue. Those who had no faith in man's capacity for self-govern ment, those whose interests were in making firm and per manent old dynasties, were already exulting over the failure of the American Repubhc, as " another bubble burst," an other fruitless effort at self-government. Meanwhile, the issue between freedom and slavery began to be more sharply defined. The forbearance of the Governraent on the subject of slavery, was cited by rebel emissaries in Europe, as evidence 244 condition of affairs DECEMBER, 1861. 245 that the issue was not freedom against slavery, but empire and subjugation against independence and self-government. It was obvious that sound statesmanship, as it regarded our cause both at home and abroad, required a more vigor ous policy. It became every day more clear that slavery was not only the cause of the war, but, as treated thus far, an element of great strength, and a bond of union to the rebel States. The neglect of the government to strike decisive and fatal blows at this institution, especially to those who did not know and appreciate the condition of affairs in Maryland and Kentucky, was inexplicable, and had encouraged the ene mies, and paralyzed the friends of the republic abroad. The friends of the administration impatiently asked, if the time had not arrived for raaking war directly upon slavery ? They insisted that this source of strength to the rebels could be made a source of weakness; that the raillions of colored people were the friends of the Republic, and could be made to aid its cause against their masters. The period was criti. cal. Bull Run and Ball's Bluff were unavenged, and the great army under McClellan had as yet done nothing to give confidence to the country. The Confederates were striving to secure recognition abroad. Mason and Slidell, were in Fort Warren as prisoners taken from beneath the folds of the British flag, and England, backed by France, would make the refusal to surrender thera, a cause of war. Such was the condition in which Congress asserabled, and received the President's raessage, in Lfeceraber, 1861. This raessage has fewer of the characteristics of Mr. Lin coln, than any other of his State papers. The truth is, he was feeling his way, revolving the slavery question, and was scarcely yet ready to announce a settled policy on that subject. He congratulates Congress that the patriotism of the people had proved equal to the occasion, and that the number of troops tendered, greatly exceeded the force called for. He calls the attention of Congress to the fact, that Mary land, Kentucky, and Missouri, neither of which at his first call for troops in April, had proraised a single soldier, had, at the date of the message,, not less than 40,000 men in the 246 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. field under the Union flag; and that in West Virginia, the Union men, after a severe struggle, were masters of the country. He announced the retirement of General Scott, and stated that public sentiment and the recommendation of the Lieutenant General, and Executive confidence, had all indicated Geineral McClellan as the raan upon whom to place the command. He said that the insurgents at the beginning, confidently claimed a strong support from North of Mason and Dixon's line, and that the friends of the Union were not free from ap prehension on the point. But this was sobn settled, the people of the free States were united for the Union. Of the slave States, little Delaware was right from the first. Mary land was made to seem against the Union. The soldiers of the Republic, were assaulted, bridges were burned, and rail roads torn up within her limits, and the Government had been at one tirae, for several days without the ability to bring a single regiraent over her soil to the Capital. Now all this was changed. She had already given seven regiments to the Union cause, and none to the enemy. Kentucky, for sometime in doubt, was now, decidedly, and he hoped, un changeably, on the side of the Union. Missouri was com paratively quiet, and" he believed could not be again overcome by the insurrectionists. Upon the policy on the slavery question, he said, "I have adhered to the act of Congress, confiscating property, and freeing persons held to service, used for insurrectionary purposes." On the subject of emancipating and arming ne groes, he said, " The Union must be preserved, and all in dispensable raeans raust be used, but he deprecated haste in the use of extreme measures, which might reach the loyal, as well as disloyal." It is worthy of notice as illustrative of his views of the condition of the insurgent States, and the pouKr of Congress over them in time of war, that he recommends the establish ment by act of Congress, of courts in the insurgent States, when brought under the control of the National Government in which civil rights might be adjudicated. This is his language on that subject; president's message. 247 " I have been urgently solicited to establish hy military power, courts to administer summary justice in such cases. I have thus far declined to do this, because I have heen unwilling to go beyond the pressure of necessity in the unusual exercise of power. But the power of Congress I suppose, is equal to the anomalous condition, and therefore I refer the ¦whole matter to Congress with the hope that a plan may be devised for the administration of justice in all such parts of the insurgent States as may be under the control of this Government."* The courts were to be temporary, but, the recommendation is conclusive, that he recognized fully, the right of Congresii to legislate for the insurgent States, while in a condition of war, and before they were restored to their proper relations to the Union. He reviewed at some length, the condition of affairs, the advantages ofour democratic institutions; and expressed his deep con-victions that the fate of free government was in volved in the contest. " The struggle," said he, " of to-day, is not altogether for to-day. It is for a vast future also." Mr. Cameron's report, as Secretary of War, was a very important paper. After reciting the operations of the army, he states that under the call for 75,000 men, made by the President, and under the call for 500,000 volunteers for three years, authorized by act of Congress in July, there had been raised an army of 600,000 men. His report, as originally prepared, ably discussed and strongly recomraended the arraing and emancipation of the slaves of the seceding States. This part of the report was not submitted to the President until it was in print. When it was then brought to the knowledge of Mr. Lincoln, he expressed surprise and some displeasure, that a member of his Cabinet should have prepared and printed such a report, without first submitting it to hira, and he caused the report to be modified. A portion of this report is here presented as a very clear and able presentation of the great question which was then agitating the public mind : " It has become a grave question for determination, what shall be done with the slaves abandoned by their owners on the advance of our * Message of December 3d, 186L MoPherson's Political History, p. 132. 248 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. troops into Sputhern territory, as in the Beaufort District of South Carolina. The whole white population therein is six thousand, while the number of negroes exceeds thirty-two thousand. The panic which drove their masters in wild confusion from their homes, leaves them in undisputed possession of the soil. Shall they, armed by their masters, be placed in the field to fight against, or shall their labor be continually employed in producing the means for supporting the armies of the rebellion ? " It was the boast of the leader of the rebellion, while he yet had a seat in the Senate of the United States, that the Southern States would be comparatively safe and free from the burdens of war, if it should be brought on by the contemplated rebellion, and , that boast was accom panied by the savage threat that 'Northern towns and cities would become the victims of rapine and military spoil,' and that 'Northern men should smell Southern gunpowder and feel Southern steel.' No one doubts the disposition of the rebels to carry that threat into execu tion. The wealth of Northern towns and cities, the produce of North ern farms. Northern workshops and manufactories, would certainly be seized, destroyed, or appropriated .as military spoil. No property in the North would be spared from the hands of the rebels, and their rapine would be defended under the laws of war. While the loyal States thua have all their property and possessions at stake, are the insurgent rebels to carry on warfare against the Government in peace and security to their own property? "Eeason, and justice, and self-preservation, forbid that such should be the policy of this Government, but demand, on the contrary, that, being forced by traitors and rebels to the extremity of war, all the rights and powers of war should be exercised to bring it to a speedy end. " Those who make war against the Government, justly forfeit all rights of property, privilege or security derived from the Constitution and laws against which they are in armed rebellion ; and as the labor and service of their slaves constitute the chief property of the rebels such property should share the common fate of war, to which they have devoted the property of loyal citizens. "As has been said, the right to deprive the rebels of their property in slaves and slave labor, is as clear and absolute, as the right to take forage from the field, or cotton from the warehouse, or powder and arms from the magazine. To leave the enemy in the possession of such property as forage and cotton, and military stores, and the means of constantly reproducing them, would be madness. It is, therefore mad ness to leave them in peaceful and secure possession of slave property CAMERON'S REPORT. 249 more valuable and efficient to them for war, than forage, cotton, and military stores. -Such policy would be National suicide. What to do with that species of property, is- a question that time and choumstances will solve, and need not be anticipated further than to repeat that they cannot be held by the Government as slaves. It would be useless to keep them as prisonei's of war ; and self preservation, the highest duty of a government,- or of individuals, demands that they should be dis posed of, or employed in the most effective manner, that will tend most speedily to suppress the insurrection, and restore the authority of the Government. If it shall be found that the men who have been held by the rebels as slaves, are capable of- bearing arms, and performing efficient military service, it ^s the right, and may become the duty of the Government to arm and equip them, and employ their services against the rebels, under proper military regulation, discipline and command. " But in whatever manner they may be used by the Government, it is plain that, once liberated by the rebellious act of their masters, they should never again be restored to bondage. By the master's treason and rebellion, he forfeits all right to the labor and service of his slave ; and the slave of the rebellious master, by his service to the Government, becomes justly entitled to freedom and protection. I " The disposition to be made of the slaves of rebels, after the close of the war, can be safely left to the wisdom of Congress. "The repre sentatives of the people will unquestionably secure to the loyal slave holders every right to which they are entitled under the Constitution." The foregoing gives the substance of Mr. Cameron's ar gument. By direction of the President, that part of it in regard to emancipation and the arming of freedmen, was so modified as to read as follows : " It is already a grave question what shall be done with those slaves who were abandoned by their owners on the advance of our troops into Southern territory, as at Beaufort District, in South Carolina. The number left within our control at that point is very considerable, and similar cases will probably occur. What shall be done with them ? Can we affijrd to send them forward to their masters, to be by them armed against us, or used in producing support to sustain the i^bellion ? Their labor may be useful to us ; withheld from the enemy it lessens his military resources, and withholding them has no tendency to induce the horrors of insurrection, even in the rebel communities. They con stitute a military resource, and being suoh, that they^^hould not be 250 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. turned over to the enemy, is too plain to discuss. Why deprive him of supplies by a blockade, and voluntarily give him men to produce them ? " The disposition to be made of the slaves of rebels, after the close of the war, can be saffely left to the wisdom and patriotism of Congress. The representatives of the people will unquestionably secure to the loyal slaveholders every right to which they are entitled under the Constitution qf the country-" ^ On the 14th of January, 1862, Simon Caraeron resigned the position of Secretary of War, and Edwin M. Stanton was appointed his successor. This appointment of a man who had held a position in the Cabinet of Buchanan was at first a matter of some surprise to the Republican friends of the President. The President was recommended to make this appoint ment by Senator Wade, of Ohio, John A. Bingham, of the House, and other radical members of Congress. The Presi dent himself thought it expedient to give the appointment to a war democrat if a suitable man could be found. It was believed Stanton would be for vigorous fighting. Senator Wade saiM: "If the democrats think they have gained any thing by the appointment of Stanton, as Secretary of War, they will learn their mistake ; they will find they have caught 'a tartar.' Stanton (in his own rough phrase) is for fight in earnest." , The new Secretary soon gave proof of his great energy, his wonderful industry, and his power as an organizer. He was always a belligerent, looking at great ends, not very scrupulous about the means of removing the obstacles which stood in his path, and somewhat careless of the forms and restraints of law. Honest and true, and intensely in earnest: if a thing was right in itself, he would cut through, ortreak over all formal obstacles which stood in his way. His tem per was irritable, but placable. There were many instances of cruel^ injustice, which the more patient and just Mr. Lin coln was compelled to correct, but he himself was ready to repair a wrong when convinced he had coramitted one. He acted with the radicals in Congress more, it is believed ACTION OF CONGRESS. 251 because they were in earnest, than on account of sympathy with their principles. He hated the slaveholding traitors more than he loved liberty. This, the first regular session of the Thirty-seventh Con gress, made large advances towards the entire abolition of slavery. Its measures were justly characterized by a Senator as looking to ?universal abolition. By its legislation and its grand debates, this Congress prepared the way for the great edict of emancipation issued by Abrahara Lincoln. The great anti-slavery raeasures which will hand down this Con gress to immortality, were — First, The abolition of slavery at the National Capitol. Second, The prohibition of slavery in all the Territories. Third, The setting free the slaves of rebels. Fourth, Giving legal authority to employ colored men, as soldiers, thus converting slaves into patriotic Union sold iers. Fifth, The enactment of an additional article of war, prohibiting any officer or person in the military or naval ser-^dce, under pain of dismissal, frora aiding in the arrest of any fugitive slave. These great measures were carried after long discussion, and able and full debate. The truth of history, and j ustice to great principles, and those who advocate them, require that the world should know the history of these measures whichhavechanged the character of the republic for all time to come. The delays and inactivity of the army, and dissatisfaction with its movements, resulted in the creation by Congress, on the 18th and 19th of December, of the Joint Committee on the conduct of the war. This committee was composed of Senators Wade, Chandler, and Andrew Johnson, of Tennes see, on the part of the Senate ; on Mr. Johnson being ap pointed Military Governor of Tennessee, Mr. Wright, of Indiana, was appointed in his place; and Messrs. Gooch, Covode, Julian and Odell, of the House. Many of the army officers had disregarded the act of Con gress giving freedom to all slaves employed to aid the rebels. Rebels and rebel officers, under fiags of truce, continued to enter the Union lines, and Union officers had been guilty of surrendering to them colored men who had fled to their 252 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. camps, bringing most valuable information. This was, how ever, far from being a universal practice. General Curtiss, of Iowa, in command in Arkansas, ordered immediate eman cipation of all slaves who had been at work for the Confede racy by consent of their masters. So did General Hunter in South Carolina, and he continued to do this until his general order of the 9th of May, 1862, declaring free all slaves in his department, consisting of South Carohna, Georgia and Florida. The House had scarcely completed its organization, when Lovejoy, indignant that loyal negroes should still be sent back to slavery from the camps of the Union army, on the 4th of December, introduced a bill making it a penal offence for any officer to return a fugitive slave. Senator Wilson gave early notice of a bill in the Senate for the same purpose. The various propositions on the subject finally resulted in the enactment of an additional article of war, forbidding, on pain of dismissal from the service, the arrest of any fugitive, by any officer or person in the military or naval service of the United States. The location of the Capital on slave territory had proved one ofthe most important triumphs ever achieved by the slave holders. The powerful influence of society, local public sentiment, fashion, and the local press, in favor of the insti tution, was ever felt; and its power, from 1800 to 1860, could scarcely be over-estimated. Our country had long been reproached and stigmatized by the world, and the character of a pro-slavery despotism over the colored race fixed upon it, by reason of the existence of slavery at the National Capital. The friends of liberty had for years chafed and struggled in vain against this malign infiuence. Con gress had supreme power to legislate for the District of Columbia, and was exclusively responsible for the continued existence of slavery there. Mr. Lincoln, it will be remem bered, when ser-ving his single term in Congress, had intro duced a bill for its gradual abolition. The President and the friends of the Union and of liberty, at the opening of this Congress, thought it quite time this relic of barbarism at the National Capital should be destroyed. On the 4th of ABOLITION OF SLAVERY AT THE CAPITAL. 253 December, Senator Wilson, of Massachusetts, introduced a resolution that the Committee on the Judiciary be directed to consider the expediency of abolishing slavery in the District of Columbia, with compensation to loyal owners. On the 15th of Deceraber, he introduced a bill for the iraraediate emancipation of slaves, and the payment to their loyal owners of an average sum of $300, and providing for the appointment of commissioners to assess the sums to be paid each claimant, and appropriating one million of dollars for the purpose. The debates upon this bill, involved the whole subject of Slavery, the rebellion, the past, present and future of the country. Mr. Da-vis of Kentucky, made a very remarkable prediction to the Senate and the country, saying, "If you should liberate the slaves in the rebellious States, the mo ment you re-organize ihe white inhabitants of these States, as States of the Union, they would reduce these slaves again to a state of slavery, or they would expel thera, or hunt them like wild beasts arrd exterminate them." Such was the humane senti ment of the exponent of slavery ! And yet, recent events indicate that there was too much of truth in it. Senator WiUey of West Virginia, opposed the bill as a part of a series of measures already initiated, looking to the universal abolition of slavery by Congress. In the midst of this grave debate invoMng their liberty, many of the more intelligent colored men thronged to the galleries of the Senate, and listened, while Senators urged reasons for and against setting them free. Eager, anxious and hopeful, this impressible race could not suppress the ex hibition ofthe intense solicitude they felt in the result. Their dark faces lighted up and saddened with the varying pro gress of the debate. Senator Davis could not appreciate their feelings, and he called attention to, and seemed him self astonished at their audacity. " I saw," said he, "a few days ago, several negroes thronging the open door, listening to the debate on this Subject, and I suppose in a few months, they -will be crowding white ladies out of the galleries !" Some Senators desired to couple with emancipation, colo nization of the colored races. Others objected to paying the 254 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. masters for the slaves, and insisted that if money was to be paid, it ought to be fairly divided between the master and the slave, on an equitable adjustment of wages for labor, and an equivalent rendered by the master. Mr. Sumner closed an eloquent speech in favor of the bill by saying, " Slavery -will give way to freedora, but the good work will proceed. What God and Nature decree, rebellion cannot arrest. And as the whole wide-spread tyranny begins to tremble, then, above the din of battle, sounding frora the sea, and echoing along the land, above even the exultations of victory on well fought fields, will ascend the voices of gladness and benediction, swelling from generous hearts, wherever civilization bears sway, to commemorate a sacred triumph, whose trophies in stead of tattered banners, will be ransomed slaves." The bill passed the Senate by yeas, twenty-nine, nays, six. When the bill came up for action in the House, containing as it did an appropriation of money, under the rules, it was necessarily referred to the Committee of the whole House. As there was a large nuraber of bills in advance of it on the calender, its enemies, although in a minority, had hopes of delaying action or defeating it. The struggle to take up the bill came on the 10th of April, under the lead of that accomplished, adroit, and bold parli amentarian, Thaddeus Stevens. He moved that the House go into committee, which motion was agreed to, Mr. Dawes of Massachusetts, in the Chair. The Chairman called the cal ender in its order, and on motion of Mr. Stevens, every bill was laid aside until the bill for the abolition of slavery in the District was reached. An unsuccessful effort to lay the bill on the table was made by a member from Maryland. F. P. Blair, Jr., in an able speech, advocated colonization in connection with abolition. He said : "It is in the gorge ous region of the American tropics, that our freedmen will find their homes ; among a people without prejudice against their color, and to whom they will carry and impart new en ergy and vigor, in retum for the welcome which will greet them, as the pledge of the future protection and friendship of our great republic ; I look with confidence to this move- DEBATE ON ABOLITION AT THE NATIONAL CAPITAL. 255 ment, as the true and only solution of this question of slavery."* The venerable John J. Crittenden of Kentucky, opposed the passage of the bill. He expressed fears that its passage would strengthen the apprehension that Congress would in terfere with slavery in the States, to the fear of which he at tributed the war. He opposed it also, because it was a link in the chain of universal emancipation. He was replied to by Mr. Bingham of Ohio, a gentleman of vehement, irapassioned eloquence, and of an acute and dis criminating mind. On the subject of human rights, he was always ardent and full of enthusiasm in favor of freedom. After alluding to the faot that none denied the constitutional power of Congress to abolish slavery, he considered the ques^ tion of expediency. Speaking in reply to Mr. Crittenden concerning a quotation made by the venerable member from Kentucky, from Magna Charta, he said : " That great charter which the Barons wrung from the trembling, unwilKng hands of their King six centuries ago, and which the histo rian of the English Constitution declares to be " the keystone of En glish hberty," only provided in the section which the gentleman cited, that "no freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or disseized or outlawed, or banished, or anyways injured, nor will we pass upon him nor send him, unless by legal judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land." — Magna Charta, sec, 45.'\ " That provision, sir, only protected from unjust seizure, imprison ment, disseizin, outlawry, and banishment, those fortunate enough to be known as preemen ; it secured no privileges to vassals or slaves. Sir, our Constitution, the new Magna Charta, which the gentleman aptly says is the greatest provision for the rights of mankind and for the ameli oration of their condition, rejects in its bill of rights, the restrictive word " freeman," and adopts in its stead, the more comprehensive words "no person," thus giving its protection to all, whether born free or bond. The provision ofour Constitution is ' No person shall be deprived of life, or liberty, or property, without due process of law.' This clear recog nition of the rights of all was a new gospel to mankind, something un- , ?Cong. Globe, 2d Sess. 37 Cong., p. 1834— p. 1636. tl7 Vol. Cong. Globe, p. 1638, 2d sess. 37 Cong. 256 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. known to men of the thirteenth century, who then demanded and re ceived for themselves, the acknowledgment of their rights as freemen. The Barons of England demanded the security of law for themselves ; the patriots of America proclaimed the security and protection of law for all. The later and nobler revelation to our fathers was, that all men are equal before the law. No matter upon what spot of the earth's surface they were born; no matter whether an Asiatic or African, a European, or an American sun first burned upon them ; no matter whether citizens or strangers ; no matter whether rich or poor ; no mat ter whether wise or simple ; no matter whether strong or weak ; this new magna charta to mankind declares the rights of all to life, and lib erty and property are equal before the law ; that no person by virtue of the American Constitution, by the majesty of American law, shall be deprived of life, or liberty, or property, without due process of law. Unhappily, for about sixty years, this provision of the Constitution here upon the hearthstone of the Eepublic, where the jurisdiction of the Government of the United States is exclusive, without State limitation, and subject to no restraint other than that imposed by the letter and spirit of the Constitution, thia sacred guarantee of life and liberty and property to all, has been wantonly ignored and disregarded as to a large class of our natural born citizens." In the course of the debate, he eulogised the State of Massachusetts as follows : * " The old Bay State, true to her sacred, her immortal traditions, recollecting that her soil is holy ground, marked with the footprints of the apostles and martyrs of civil and religious liberty, has held to her ancient faith that rights, even political rights are inseparable from man hood and citizenship, and in no wise dependent upon complexion, or the accident of birth. I trust in God, whatever States may falter, Massa chusetts may continue in the ancient ways forever more. Taxation without representation, once stirred the American people hke the blast of a trumpet; rather than submit to it, they proclaimed resistance unto death. In the purer and better days of the Eepublic, taxation only with representation, was the very sign under which the Jefferso nian Democracy were wont to conquer." He then proclaims the identity of Christianity and -Democracy: *Cong. Globe, 2d sess, 37 Cong, p. 1639. SPEECH OF JOHN A. BINGHAM. 257 " They found out and adopted a wiser, juster and better policy, than pagan ever knew. They learned it from the simple but profound teach ings of Him who went about doing good ; who was no respecter of per sons, who made the distant land of his nativity forever sacred to man kind, and whose intense holiness shed majesty over the manger and the straw, and took from the cross its shame and reproach. By His great apostle, came to men and nations the new message, declaring the true God, to whom the pagan inscribed unknown upon His altar ; that God who made the world, and giveth to all life and breath, and hath made of one blood all nations of men to dwell on all the face of the earth. From this new message to men, has sprung, the new and better civil ization of to-day. What was your declaration at Philadelphia on the 4th of July 1776, that ' All men are created equal,' but a reiteration of the great truth announced by the apostle of the Nazarene ? What but this is the sublime principle of your Constitution, the equality of all men before the law ? To-day we deliberate whether we shall make good, by legislation, this vital principle of the Constitution, here, in the Capital of the Eepublic' Crittenden had said " The time was unpropitious." " Sir," said Mr, Bingham, " I think no time is unpropitious for an act of siraple justice." Bingham closed his eloquent speech by saying : " One year ago (llth April 1861) slavery opened its batteries of treason upon Fort Surater at Charleston ; let the anniversary of the crime be signalized by the banishment of slavery from the National Capital." ^ Said Riddle of Ohio : " The result of this war is freedom to all. Every day of its contin uance, every delay, every dragging moment, makes this end the more inevitable. Every step on slave soil, every battle fought, no matter with what temporary result, every musket fired, every sword brandish ed, every soldier that suffers, and every heart that mourns, but makes this result the more absolute. Our early disasters. Bull Eun and Ball's Bluff, the death of Lyon and the removal of Fremont, shall all bear rich fruits ; and the breeze that mournfully lifts the flag of the drown ed Cumberland, where the bitter salt sea quenched the noblest hearts that ever burned with American heroism, shall yet bear to earth's ends, the legend of a continent made free ! * * * * * " It is most fitting that while the army marches to the restoration of the National power over the form of fallen slavery, and tramps its' life 17 258 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. out, that the solemn lustration of the Nation's Capital should be per- . formed by our hands ; that these fetters should dissolve in our breath, so that when our country again confronts her sister nations, though her feet should still be ensanguined with the mingled blood of her filial and parricidal children, she may present her countenance in cloudless, though saddened beauty, purged of its hideous deformity, by her own uncon strained hand. " Make haste to complete this great act, and it shall proclaim itself to the waiting and oppressed of the earth, as the realized gospel of dehv erance. The yellow waves of the Potomac in their downward flow to the sea, shall whisper in liquid murmurs to the great sleeper on its banks, that the city that bears his name, is now worthy of it.'' Wickliffe of Kentucky, venerable in years, but fiery and vehement in temper, moved to amend the bill by striking out the provision prohibiting the exclusion of witnesses on account of color ; he said : " I do hope the friends of the bill will not so far outrage the laws of the District, as to authorize slaves or free negroes to be witnesses !" Stevens, in reply, expressed the hope that the committee would not so far " continue an outrage as not to allow any man of credit whether white or black, to be a witness." Mr. Vallandigham vehemently opposed the bill, declaring truly there were not ten men in the Thirty-sixth Congress, who would have voted for the abolition of slavery in the District. The slaveholders, by their rebellion had produced the charige. After various amendments, and long continued struggle to defeat the bill by parliamentary tactics, on motion of Mr. Stevens, the previous question was sustained, and the bill passed by a vote of 92 ayes to 38 noes. This bill was approved by the President, and became a law on the 16th day of April. Its passage was hailed with joy throughout the Union, and the colored men themselves met in their churches, and offered their gratitude to Almighty God for liberty. A distinguished officer of the old United States array states that years before the rebellion, he had been much among the slaves, and that in passing their cabins at night, when they supposed no white man was near, his attention SLAVERY PROHIBITED IN THE TERRITORIES. 259 had been often arrested by hearing earnest prayers; and going nearer, he heard men and women praying to God for their liberty. Such was the impression which the earnest ness and faith of these poor creatures made upon him, that he declares, that fi-om that time, he never doubted but sooner or later, the slaves would be freed. The territories had long been the battle-fields on which free labor and slavery had struggled for supremacy. Tke early policy of the Governraent, that of the fathers, was prohibition. The proposition of Jefferson, that slavery should never exist in any territory of the United States failed only by one vote, caused by the absence of the delegate from New Jersey. The ordinance of 1787 inaugurated the policy. Slavei-y was strong enough in 1820 to secure a division by an isothermal line of 36° 30' of latitude, embodied in what was called the Missouri Compromise. In 1854, that compromise was repealed, with the avowed purpose on the part of the slaveholders of carrying slavery into all the Territories. Then came the Dred Scott decision, that Congress could not pro hibit slavery in the Territories, and then the hand-to-hand struggle in Kansas followed. The distinct issue of the ex clusion of slavery by Congressional enactment was, in 1860, submitted to the people, and Mr. Lincoln was elected upon the distinct and unequivocal pledge to the policy of prohibition. On the 24th of March, 1862, Mr. Arnold, of Illinois, intro duced " a Bill to render freedom national, and slavery sec tional," and which, after reciting " To the end that freedom may be and remain forever the fundamental law of the land in all places whatsoever, so far as it lies in the power, or depends upon the action of the Government of the United States to make it so, it was enacted that slavery, except as a punishment of crime, whereof the party had been duly con victed, should henceforth cease and be prohibited forever, in all the following places, viz. : 1st, In all the Territories of the United States then existing, or thereafter to be formed or acquired in any way. 2d, In all places purchased or acquired with the consent of the United States for forts, raagazines. 260 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. dock-yards and other needful buildings, and over which the United States have or shall have exclusive legislative juris diction. 3d, In all vessels on the high seas. 4th, In all places whatsoever, where the National Government has exclusive jurisdiction."* Mr. Cox opposed the bill vehemently, declaring that,' in his judgment, it was a bill for the benefit of secession and Jeff. Davis. Mr. Fisher, in an able speech, opposed the passage of the bill. In conclusion, he appealed to the majority to let this cup pass from our lips. He said: "We have done nobly: we have done much in behalf of liberty and humanity at this session of Congress. Let us then here call a halt and take our bearings. Finally, as a concession to the more conservative members, Mr. Lovejoy offered an araendraent, striking out all except the prohibition of slavery in the Territories, and on which he demanded the previous question, and the bill passed the House, ayes eighty -five, noes fifty. The bill was slightly modified in the Senate, and finally passed the House on the 19th of June, prohibiting slavery forever in all the Territories of the United States now existing, or that might hereafter be acquired. Thus, the second great step towards the destruction of slavery was taken ; and closing the great struggle over slavery in the Territories, which had agitated the country, with short intervals, since the organization of the Republic under the Constitution. Had this act been passed in 1784, when Jefferson proposed one substantially like it, the terrible war of the slaveholders would never have come upon the Republic. The institution would never have grown to such vast power. Missouri would have had the wealth and position of Ohio, and slavery, driven by raoral and econoraical influences towards the Gulf, -would have gradually and peacefully disappeared. We have seen that the Secretary of War, on the 14th of Septeraber, 1861, instructed General Sherman to avail him self of the service of any persons, whether fugitives from * See Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-seventh Congress, 2042. NEGRO SOLDIERS. <- 261 labor or not, who might offer themselves to the National Gov ernment, aild he was instructed to employ them in such service as they might be best fitted for ; aud that he might organize them into squads, companies or otherwise, as he might deem most beneficial to the ser-vice. This was qualified by the President, so as not to mean "a general arming for military service." It will be remembered that a portion of the report of Mr. Cameron, as Secretary of War, recommending the general arraing of the slaves, made December 1, 1861, was stricken out by order of the President. The public sentiment had not at that time, in his judgment, advanced far enough to warrant this measure. Indeed, whether the Government should avail itself of the ready and willing services of citizens and slaves of African descent, was, strangely enough in the light of the present, a question which agitated the public mind in the early stages of the rebellion. Many very loyal and sincere men hesitated, and some opposed it. We have seen that at first, colored men escaping to the Union lines, though bringing with them most important intelligence, and strong arms and brave and loyal hearts, found there no wel come, but, on the contrary, were repelled ; and in some in stances, rebel masters were permitted to hunt loyal fugitive slaves within fhe Union lines, and within Union camps. General Halleck issued an order, November 20, 1861, pro hibiting fugitive slaves from being admitted within the lines of his army, a*nd expelling those who had already taken refuge there.* On the 2d of February, 1862, he repeated the order that no fugitive slaves should be admitted within the lines or camps, except by special order of the Coraraanding General. General Buell, on the 6th of March, 1862, declared: "It has corae to my knowledge, that slaves sometimes make their way improperly into our lines, and, in some instances, they may be enticed there, but I think the number has been raagnified by report. Several applications have been made to me by persons whose servants have been found in our camps, and in every instance that I know of, the master has recovered his servant, and taken him away." * Mcpherson's Hist., p. 248-250. 262 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Even gallant General Hooker, on the 26th of March, was capable of issuing an or^er authorizing slave masters to search for fugitive slaves through all the camps of his coramand. He said: "Messrs. Nally, Gray, Dumraington, Dent, Adams, Speake, Price, Posey and Cobey, citizens of Maryland, have negroes supposed to be with some of the regiraents of this division. The brigadier general com manding, directs that they may be permitted to visit all the camps of his command in search of their property, and if found, that they be allowed to take possession of the same without any interference whatever. Should any obstacle be thrown in their way by any officer or soldier, in the division, they will be at once reported by the regimental commanders to these headquarters." On the contrary. General Doubleday, on the 8th of April, 1862, directed that all negroes coming into the lines of any of the camps or forts of his command, should be treated as persons, and not as property; 'and declaring that under no circumstances has the commander of a camp or a fort the power of surrendering a person claimed as a fugitive slave. The article of war recently enacted by Congress prohibits it. This General expressed the opinion that the fugitives brought much valuable information, which could not be ob tained from any other source, and were most valuable as scouts, guides and spies; General T. Williams, ou the 5th of June, 1862, ordered that all fugitives, negroes in his camps should be turned out beyond his lines of guards and sentinels. Colonel Paine, of Wisconsin, refused to obey this order, as violating the new article of war, and for this offence he was placed under arrest. It is difficult to realize the tyranny which slavery had es tablished over the minds of the people, even of the free States. The foregoing orders, perhaps, furnish as striking illustration of it as any fact in history. That there should ever have been any hesitation in welcoming loyal colored men, and transferring them from aiding the rebels, to the Union side, is indeed very strange. The prejudice that so long held the minds of the people to the sacred rights of NEGRO SOLDIERS. 263 slaveholding, and in which these orders against fugitive slaves were conceived, began to disappear in the smoke of battle. The first regiment of negro troops raised during the war, was raised and organized by General Da-nd Hunter, in the Spring of 1862, while in command in the Department of the South. He had been a graduate at West Poiut, and was educated as a pro-slavery man, but like the gallant Lyon, serving in Kansas during the period the effort was made to force slavery upon that territory, the outrages of the slave holders converted him into a radical abolitionist. Finding hiraself charged with the duty of holding the coast of Florida, South Carolina and Georgia, with very inadequate force, and the Governraent being at that time unable to furnish raore, seeing the three States of his coraraand swarraing with able- bodied negroes, all loyal Union men, ready to fight for their libertj', he saw no reason why they should not be organized into soldiers. He accordingly proceeded vigorously in the .work of organizing and drilling these negroes, and reporting his proceedings to the Secretary of War received no response. Meanwhile the facts were spread through the land, and came to the ears of Mr. Wickliffe — a fierce pro-slavery member of Congress from Kentucky. The border States were particularly sensitive on the sub ject of fugitive slaves and colored citizens being used as soldiers, and on the 9th of June, 1862, on raotion of Mr. Wickliffe, of Kentucky, the House adopted the following resolution: " Resolved, That the Secretary of War be directed to inform this House — 1st, If General Hunter, of the Department of South Carohna, has organized a regiment of South Carolina volunteers for the defence of the Union, composed of black men_(fugitive slaves,) and appointed th.i colonel and other officers to command them. 2d, Was he author ized by the Department to organize and muster into the army of the United States, as soldiers, its fugitive or captured slaves ? 3d, Has he been furnished -(vith clothing, uniforms, etc., for such force ? 4th, Has he been furnished by order of the Department of War with arms to be placed in the hands of these slaves ? 5th, To report any orders given said Hunter, and correspondence between him and the Department." 264 LINCOLN AND' THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. This resolution was forwarded by the Secretary of War to Hunter, with a request for an immediate reply. In response to this, General Hunter made the following reply : "Sir: — I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of a communica tion from the Adjutant General of the Army, dated June 18, 1862, requesting me to furnish you with the information necessary to answer certain resolutions introduced in the House of Eepresentatives, June 9, 1862, on motion of Hon. Mr. Wickliffe, of Kentucky, — the sub stance being to inquire : — 1st, Whether I had organized or was organ izing a regiment of 'fugitive slaves' in this Department. 2d, Whe ther any authority had been given to me from the War Department for such organization. Sd, Whether I had been furnished by order of the War Department with clothing, uniforms and equipments, etc., for such a force. " To the first question, therefore, I reply that no regiment of ' fugi tive slaves ' has been, or is being, organized in this Department. There is, however, a fine regiment of persons, whose late masters are 'fugitive rebels' — men who, everywhere fly before the appearance of the Na tional flag, leaving their servants behind them to shift as best they can for themselves. So far, indeed, are the loyal persons composing this' regiment from seeking to avoid the presence of their late owners, that they are now, one and all, working with remarkable industry to place themselves in a position to go in full and effective pursuit of their fugacious and traitorous proprietors. " To the second question, I have the honor to answer that the instruc tions given to Brigadier General W. T.Sherman, by Hon. Simon Cameron, kte Secretary of War, and turned over to me by succession, for my guidance, do distinctly authorize me to employ alMoyal persons offering their services in defence of the Union, and for the suppression of this rebellion, in any manner I might see fit, or that the circumstances might call for. There, is no restriction as to the character or color of the persons to be employed, or the nature of the employment, whether civil or military, in which their services should be used. I conclude, therefore; that I have been authorized to enlist 'fugitive slaves' as soldiers, could any such be found in this Department. No such charac ters, however, have yet appeared within view of our most advanced pickets — the loyal slaves everywhere remaining on their plantations to welcome us, aid us, and supply us with food, .labor and information. It is the masters who have, in every instance, been the 'fugitives,' running away from loyal sla.ves as well as loyal soldiers, and whom we have only partially been able to see, chiefly their heads over ramparts, or, rifle hunter's reply to WICKLIFFE. 265 in hand, dodging behind trees in the extreme distance. In the absence of any 'fugitive master law,' the deserted slaves would be wholly with out remedy, had not the crime of treason given them the right to pur sue, capture and bring back those persons, of whose protection they have been thus suddenly bereft. "To the third interrogatory, it is my painful duty to reply that 1 never have received any specific authority for issues of clothing, uni form, arms, equipments, etc., to th« troops in question — my general instructions from Mr. Cameron to employ them in any manner I might find necessary and the military exigencies of the Department and the country, being my only, but, in my judgment, sufficient justification. Neither have I had any specific authority for supplying these persons with shovels, spades and pickaxes, when employing them as laborers, nor with boats and oars when using them as lightermen, but these are not points included in Mr. Wickliffe's resolution. To me, it seemed that liberty to employ men in one particular capacity, implied with it, liberty, also, to supply them with the necessary tools; and, acting upon this faith, I have clothed, equipped and armed the only loyal regiment yet raised in South Carolina. '' I must say, in vindication of my own conduct, that had it not been for the many other diversified and imperative claims on my time and attention, a much more satisfactory result might have been hoped for, and that in place of only one, as at present, at least five or six well drilled, brave and thoroughly acclimated regiments should by this time have been added to the loyal forces of the Union. The experiment of arming the blacks, so far as I have made it, has been a complete and marvellous success. They are sober, docile, attentive and enthusiastic, displaying great natural capacity for acquiring the duties of the soldier. They are eager beyond all things to take the field and be led into ac tion ; and it is the unanimous opinion of the officers who have had charge of them, that, in the peculiarities of this climate and country, they will prove invaluable auxiliaries, fully equal to the similar regi ments so long and successfully used by the British authorities in the West India Islands. "In conclusion, I will say it is my hope — there appearing no possi bility of other reinforcements owing to the exigencies of the campaign in the Peninsula — to have organized by the end of next Fall, and to be able to present to the Government, from forty-eight to fifty thousand of these hardy and devoted soldiers." The grim Secretary read this reply with great satisfaction, and hurried it down to Congress, and its reception there fur nished one ofthe most amusing and interesting scenes which 266 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. ever occurred in a grave, deliberative body. The irascible Kentuckian foamed with rage, while shouts of laughter greeted the reading of the reply from all parts of the House. Hunter's successful movement in organizing colored soldiers, and this sarcastic reply, settled the question -that negroes should have the privilege of fighting for the Union and their own liberty. For this act of common sense. General Hunter was outlawed by the Confederates. On the 9th of July, 1862, Senator Grimes, of Iowa, moved to amend the bill providing for the calling out of the mihtia, by providing ; "that there should be no exemption from military service on account of color ; that when the mili tia should be called into service, the President should have full power and authority to organize them according to race or color." Senator Carlisle, of West Virginia, declared that the negro constituted no part of the militia of his State. Preston King, of New York, moved to amend the amend ment of Mr. Grimes, by providing, that the President should be authorized to receive into the service of the United States for any war service for which they might be found compe tent, persons of African descent; clothing the President with full power to enroll and organize them and to feed, and pay them such compensation as they might agree to receive, and that when any man or boy of African descent, should render such service, he, his mother, and wife and children, should forever thereafter be free." Mr. Grimes accepted this amendment. Mr. Fessenden, the distinguished Senator from Maine, in the discussion of this bill, said: " I tell the President from my place here as a Senator, and I tell the generals of our army, they must reverse their practices and their course of proceeding on this subject. * * * j advise it, here from my place — treat your enemies as enemies, as the worst of enemies, and avail yourselves like men, of every power which God has placed in your hands, to accomplish your purpose, within the rules of civilized warfare." EMPLOYMENT OF NEGRO SOLDIERS. 267 The ever faithful Senator Wilson, of Massachusetts, said: " The Senator from Delaware, as he is accustomed to do, speaks boldly and decidedly. He asks if American soldiers will fight, if we organize colored men for military purposes. Did not American soldiers fight at Bunker Hill with negroes in the ranks, one of whom shot down Major Pitcairn as he mounted the works ? Did not American soldiers fight at Eed Bank, with a black regiment from your own State sir? (Addressing Senator Anthony, of Ehode Island, then in the Chair.) Did they not fight on the battle-field of Ehode Island, with that black regiment, one of the best and bravest that ever trod the soil of this continent? Did not American soldiers fight at Fort Griswold with black men ? Did they not fight with black men in almost every battle-field of the Eevolution ? Did not the men of Kentucky and Tennessee, standing on the lines ,of New Orleans, under the eye of Andrew Jackson, fight with colored battallions whom he had summoned to the field, and whom he thanked publicly, for their gallantry in hurling back a British foe ? It is all talk, idle talk, to say that the volunteers who are fighting the battles of this country, are governed by any such narrow prejudice or bigotry. These prejudices are the results of the teachings of demagogues and politicians, who have for years, undertaken to delude and deceive the American people, and to demean and degrade them." Garrett Davis, of Kentucky, said : " In my own State, I have no doubt that there are from eighty to a hundred thousand slaves, that belong to disloyal men. You propose to place arms in the hands of the men and boys, or such of them as are able to handle arms, and to manumit the whole mass, men, women, and children, and leave them among us. Do you expect us to give our sanction and our approval to these things? No, no! We would regard their authors as our worst enemies ; and there is no foreign despotism that could come to our rescue, that we would not joyously embrace, be fore we would submit to any such condition of things as that. But before we had invoked this foreign despotism, we would arm every man and boy that we have in the land, and we would meet you in a death struggle, to overthrow together, such an oppression and our oppressors." The wise, sedate, and conservative Mr. CoUamer said: " I never could understand, and do not now understand why the Government of the United States has not the right to the use of every 268 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. man in it, black or white, for its defense; and every horse, every particle of property, every dollar in money of every man in it. * * * The second section of the amendment provides, that when any man or boy of African descent, who, by the laws of any State, owes service or labor to any person, who, during the present rebellion, has borne arms against the United States, or adhered to their enemies, by giving them aid or comfort, shall render to the United States any such service as is provided in the preceding section, he, his mother, and his wife and children, shall forever thereafter, be free, any law or usage to the con trary notwithstanding. I have a word to say about that. I am con strained to say, whether it is to the honor or dishonor of my country, that, in the land of slavery, no male slave has a child ; none is known as father to a child; no slave has a wife, marriage being repudiated in the slave system. This is the condition of things; and wonderful as it may be, we are told that that is a Christian institution!" Mr. Ten Eyck, a republican Senator frora New Jersey, moved to strike out the words " military and naval," before " service," fearful of offending the sensitiveness of the public, in regard to employing negroes iu the military service. Hon est Preston King said, " we may as well meet this question directly, and that he had done talking in such a manner as to avoid giving oftence to our enemies in this matter." He related an incident, "that, in March, 1861, the Captain of the watch at the Capitol, desired permission to omit hoisting the National flag over the Senate chamber, because it hurt the feelings of some people to look at it!" John Sherman, of Ohio, raoved that the provisions, giving freedom to the slave and his family, as a reward for railitary service, should apply to those only, who are owned by rebel masters! He said: " When we take the slave of a loyal man and make him work for us, I do not for that reason, wish to deprive the master entirely of what he regards as his property, or what is regarded by local law as his property. If we inflict injury on him by taking his property and using it for the time being, we certainly should not in addition to that, deprive him of his property altogether. The slave is in no worse condition than he was before, and I think it would be grossly unjust and improper now, or at any time, to deprive the owner of a slave of the legal right to the NEGRO SOLDIERS. 269 service of his slave, if he is a loyal and true man, and has done his duty in the emergency. I certainly would not vote for such a proposition." Mr. King, in reply said : " When we take a slave to serve the country in this emergency, my own opinion is, that he should be made free, whether he belongs to a rebel or not. I should like to have a division on this amendment, so as to have an opportunity to record my vote upon it. It is so plain a proposition, that it does not need any discussion." Mr. Browning, of Illinois, moved to amend so that the mother, wife, and children of the slave fighting for the country, should be free, only in those cases where they were owned by rebels. This proposition received in the United States Senate, 17 votes. Rough and blunt Jaraes Lane, Senator from Kansas, said : " After this war is over, a soldier, perhaps covered with scars, his mother, wife and children around him, having escaped, or their masters escaped from them, are in Washington City. I say that the Government that would restore that mother, that wife and those chil dren to slavery, after that father and husband has been covered with wounds in defence of the country, deserves to be damned. God himself would turn his face against a Government that would commit a crime like that. Let me tell the Senator from Illinois, the bill provides that if the mother, wife and children, belong to a loyal person, he is to get remuneration from the Government, as the Senator or I would for our property. I deny that this Government cannot take the slaves of the loyal and disloyal, and that they are estopped from making any use of them that they choose for the suppression of this rebellion ; and having made use of them, I say it would be a crime before God to returp them to slavery." Senators Sherman, and Browning, and all who voted for these araendraents, have lived, I think, to blush for these votes, and wish that the record could be obliterated. Senator Howard, of Michigan, said : " I do not care how lowly, how humble, how degraded a negro may be, if he takes his musket or any other implement of war, and risks 270 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. his life to defend me, my countrymen, my family, my Government, my property, my liberties, my rights, against any foe, foreign or domestic, it is my duty under God, it is my duty as a man, as a lover of justice, to see to it that he shall be free." Senator Wilson called attention to the fact, that while thousands of negroes would have gladly sought refuge in the lines of our armies, and labored for low wages, they were repelled; and that thousands and thousands of the young men of New England, and the North, had been broken do-wn by the labor of the spade in ditching and entrenching, which labor the fugitive slave would gladly have relieved them from. The bill finally passed, giving freedora to all who should perform military service, but restricting liberty to the families of such only as belonged to rebel masters. The bill passed the House on the 16th of July, 1862, and on the 17th, it received the sanction of the President, and became a law. < The measure thus sanctioned by Congress was the inaugur ation of a systera which resulted in bringing into the service of the United States, 186,057 soldiers, nearly two hundred thousand! The loss by wounds, disease, and all causes, of the negro soldiers during the war, was sixty-eight thousand one hundred and seventy-eight. This was the contribution of the negro towards the preservation of the Union, and the acquisition of liberty for his race ! The good, faithful, and just Lincoln said, in this connection : " Negroes, like other people, act upon motives. Why should they do anything for us, if we will do nothing for them. If they stake their lives for us, they must be prompted by the strongest of motives, even the promise of freedom. And the promise heing made must he kept." The.' job' of saving the Nation, was a great National one, and let none be slighted who bore an honorable part in it. There are some negroes living who can remember, and the children of some who are dead, who will not forget, that some black men with steady eye and well poised bayonet, helped mankind to save liberty in America." EMPLOYMENT OF NEGRO SOLDIERS. 271 This measure was as iraportant and effective in aiding in the overthrow of slaverj', as in crushing armed resistance to the Union. To the accomplishment of both of these great objects, the President was anxiously but cautiously looking. Measures were imraediately taken to enroll negro soldiers as well in the rebel territory, as in the border and free States, and this wms a powerful agency in redeeraing Maryland, Missouri, and Tennessee, frora the curse of slavery. OHAPTEE XII. CONFISCATION AND EMANCIPATION. Bill to Confiscate the Property and Emancipate the Slaves OP Eebels — Action op, the Senate — Or the House — Speech OF Crittenden — Eeply op Lovejoy — Wade, op Ohio — Sedgwick — Passage op the Bill — Joint Eesolution Ex planatory THEREOF — President's Message — Elliott's Eman cipation Eesolution — President's Message Recommending Gradual and Compensated Emancipation — Hunter's Order Freeing Slaves in South Carolina, etc. — Lincoln Declares it Unauthorized — His Address to Border State Delegation in Congress. ON the 16th of July, 1861, Senator Pomeroy, introduced a bill into the Senate, " To suppress the slaveholder's rebel lion." This bill abolished slavery in the seceding states. It was a measure too bold and decided for that session, but time and war soon effected, what this bill sought to accomplish. Va rious propositions were introduced at the regular session for the purpose of giving freedom to the slaves of rebels. Senator Trumbull, Chairman of the Ju'diciary Committee, on the 5th of December, introduced a bill which provided, that the slaves of persons who should take up arms against the United States, or in any manner aid or abet the rebellion, should be discharged from service and labor, and become forever free, any law to the contrary notwithstanding. The measure was zealously advocated by Senators Morrill, Sum ner, Wade, Wilmot, and others, and opposed by Senators Davis, Powell, Wiley and others. Finally, after a long dis cussion, ithe bill and the various amendments were referred to a committee of nine, with instructions to report as early as possible. This committee, through its Chairman, Mr. 272 confiscation and emancipation. 273 Clark, of New Hampshire, reported a substitute for the vari ous bills and araendraents which had been introduced. This substitute provided, in substance — First, That at any tirae after the passage of the act, the President might issue his proclamation, proclaiming the slaves of persons found thirty days after the issuing of the proclamation in arms against the Governraent, free, any law or custora to the contrary not withstanding — Second, That no slave escaping from his master should be given up, unless the claimant should estab lish by proof that he had given no aid to the rebellion, and. Third, That the President should be authorized to employ persons of African descent for the suppression of the rebellion. This last clause illustrates the strength of the still lingering influence of slavery, as though a law of Congress was neces sary to enable the President to employ persons of African rfe- scent to suppress the rebellion ! The whole people, black as well as white, were subject to the call of the President for the preservation of the Government. Strange that any should dream that the master's claim to service, and especially a rebel raaster's claim, could stand in the way of the Government's claim for service as a soldier. The Government could, forsooth, take the son from the father, but not the slave from the master! If the persons held to service were property, the Government could take it for the public and use it for its self preservation. If persons, then they were subject to call for military services. Various propositions to effect purposes of confiscation and emancipation, were introduced into the House. The subject was debated in various forms during the Winter and Spring of 1862, and finally, on the 8th of April, the whole subject was referred to a Select Comraittee of nine, to report on the various propositions pending. Perhaps one of the most interesting passages in the whole debate was that which occurred between Mr. Crittenden, the grey haired, venerable member from Kentucky, and Mr. Lovejoy, of Illinois. Crittenden was the head of a leading and influential slaveholding family of his State, and had been the successor of Henry Clay, as the leader of the old Whig party of Kentucky, An able and eloquent man, his 18 274 LINCOLN and THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. influence was great in his own State, and considerable throughout the Union. In a great speech raade on the 23d of April, in opposition to the confiscation bill, he said : " I voted against Mr. Lincoln, and opposed him honestly and sin cerely, but Mr. Lincoln has won me to his side. There is a niche in the temple of fame, a niche near to Washington, which should be occu pied by the statue of him who shall save this country. Mr. Lincoln has a mighty destiny. It is for him, if he will, to step into that niche. It is for him to be but a President of the people of the United States, and there will his statue be. But if he choose to be, in these times, a mere sectarian and a party man, thai niche will be reserved for some future and better patriot. It is in his power to occupy a place next to Washington — the founder and the preserver, side by side. Sir, Mr. Lincoln is no coward. His not doing what the Constitution forbade him to do, and what all of our institutions forbade him to do, is no proof of his cowardice." This Speech of Mr. Crittenden, was regarded as an appeal from the ablest, and raost influential border State raan, to Mr. Lincoln, to stay his hand; to withhold the proclamation of Emancipation, and save the imperiled institution of slavery. The border State men were ready to crown him the peer of Washington, if he would save slavery. Lovejoy, who knew Mr. Lincoln well, and appreciated him, replied : " The gentleman from Kentucky, says, he has a niche for Abraham Lincoln. Where is it? He points upwards. But sir. should the Pres ident follow the counsels of that gentleman, and become the defender and perpetuator of human slavery, he should point downward to some dungeon in the temple of Moloch, who feeds on human blood, and is surrounded with fires where are forged manacles and chains for human limbs— in the crypts and recesses of whose temple, woman is scourged and man tortured, and outside the walls, are lying, dogs gorged with human flesh, as Byron describes them, stretched around Stamboul. ' That ' said he, is a suitable place for the statue of one who would defend and perpetuate slavery. " Sir, the friends of American slavery need not beslime the President with their praise. He is an anti-slavery man 1 He hates human bond age. The gentleman says he did not vote for him. Why did not the gentleman remind the House that he did vote for a man now among tha rebels? I did vote for the occupant of the Executive Chair, and labored lovejoy's reply to CRITTENDEN. 275 for his election, as I never labored for that of any other man If the gentleman wants to sustain the President in his administration in its stormy and perilous voyage, why did he not vote for his wise and patri otic message, hailed and approved, so far as I know, by the whole country, except slaveholders ? I voted cordially for that message. Ex treme men, as they are called, voted for that message. On saying as I have said, slavery must perish, I do not mean that it must perish at once necessarily. Nor while I say that the slaves can take care of them selves, and that they should be let alone, do I mean to ^ireclude the idea of colonization that is not compulsory. The message of the President, therefore, presented ground where all might stand, the conservative and radical, and with common purpose and combined effort, put forth their exertions for the beneficent object of universal emancipation, ac companied by colonization, if just to the slave, and best for the country. Why did not the gentleman vote for it? I yield to no one in my honest belief in the pure patriotism of the President. I believe in these respects, he stands by the side of Washington. "I too, have a niche for Abraham Lincoln; but it is in Freedom's holy fane, and not in the blood besmeared temple of human bondage; not surrounded by slave fetters and chains, but with the symbols of free dom; not dark with bondage, but radiant with the light of liberty. In that niche he shall stand proudly, nobly, gloriously, with shattered fet ters and broken chains, and slave whips beneath his feet. If Abraham Lincoln pursues the path evidently pointed out for him in the provi dence of God, as I believe he will, then he will occupy the proud posi tion I have indicated. That is a fame worth living for; aye, more, that is a fame worth dying for, though that death led through the blood of Gethsemane, and the agony of the accursed tree. That is a fame which has glory and honor, and immortality and eternal life. Let Abraham Lincoln make himself, as I trust he will, the emancipator, the liberator, as he has the opportunity of doing, and his name shall not only be en. rolled in this earthly temple, but it will be traced on the living stones of that temple which rears itself amid the thrones and hierarchies of Heaven, whose top stone is to be brought in with shouting of grace, grace, unto it. " It is said that Wilberforce went up to the judgment seat with the broken chains of eight hundred thousand emancipated slaves. And it is not too much to believe that the slave liberated by the beneficent power of the President, should, in that future world, next to the God that made him, and the Savior -who redeemed him, thank the benefac tor who released him from the thraldom of slavery, and allowed him to learn the pathway to Heaven in the light of that volume which had to 276 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF. SLAVERY. him, been a sealed book. This is a fame worthy the aspirations of the noblest nature. But the soul recoils from the accursed and bloody fame to which the gentleman would consign the President aa the champion of human bondage, • and the preserver and perpetuator of American slavery." Dark would his fame be ! darker stlU His Immortality of 111. These two speeches, from the champions of slavery and freedom, were read to Mr. Lincoln, in his library at the White House, a roora to which he soraetiraes retired. He was moved by the picture which Lovejoy drew. The tre- • mendous responsibilities growing out of the slavery question; how he ought to treat those sons of " unrequited toil," were questions, sinking deeper and deeper into his heart. With a purpose firmly to follow the path of duty, as God gave him to see his duty, he earnestly sought the divine guidance. The Select Committee, to which the subject was referred, by Mr. Elliott, reported two bills : " a bill to confiscate the pro perty of rebels," etc., and '.'a bill to free from servitude, the slaves of rebels engaged in abetting the existing rebellion against the United States." The latter bill declares a forfeiture of all claims to service by an armed rebel to the persons known as slaves, and makes them free. It declares that the fact that a claimant had been in arms against the United States in the rebellion, should be a good defence to any claim of service set up by him. It required every claimant to establish affirmatively, not only his claim to the service, but his own loyalty. The passage of this bill was earnestly and ably pressed by Elliott, of Massachusetts, and Noell, of Missouri. This earn est patriot from the slave State of Missouri, urged the passage of the bill in the following terras: " But it is the weakness of cowards, or sympathy for murderous traitors, that now while they confront us at all points with arms in their hands, and shoot down our fathers, sons, husbands, lovers and friends, that now lifts up weak hands in helpless horror and raise querulous voices in feeble wails and cries for mercy to the rebels. Mercy now, is treason, rape, arson, an infraction of the whole deca logue ; and I suspect the brain or heart of him who now speaks of CONFISCATION AND EMANCIPATION. 277 forbearance towards them. But the legislation which we are now to enact, is to be enforced when the rebel is disarmed,- and lies bound and helpless in our prison, to receive, in unquestioning silence, the blow we now lift over him. Do not talk to me of the danger of stimulating his hatred, or of aggravating his hostility by threatened severity ; he has been at his murderous work for a twelvemonth. Do not talk to me of making him desperate ; but we may with profit contemplate his changed fortune and temper, when subdued and abject, he awaits in chains, our utterance of his doom. We can deal with the rebels in only two ways ; collectively in States, and severally as individuals. " I would free the slave of every man and woman engaged in this rebellion. The guilt of the master should inure at least to the benefit of the slave, and from this huge crime should spring a greater beneficence." Mr. Sedgwick, of New Tork, said : " As the purpose of this war is to perpetuate slavery, and as this in stitution is the cause of the war, we will break it down, destroy and overthrow the institution. I am for destroying this hostile institution in every State that has made war upon the Government, and if we have military strength enough to reduce them to possession, I propose to leave not one slave in the wake of our advancing armies — not one !" The bills passed the House on the 26th of May, and on the 23d of June, were taken up for consideration in the- Senate. Finally, the Senate adopted its own bill as a substi tute, and passed it. On the 3d of July, the House took up the confiscation bill as amended by the Senate, and refused to concur in the Senate amendment, and a conference com mittee was appointed. This committee reported a bill com bining confiscation and emancipation in one bill. It provided that all slaves of persons who should give aid and comfort to the rebellion, who should take refuge within the lines of the army; all slaves captured from rebels, or deserted by rebels and being under the control of the Government, and all slaves of rebels found or being within places occupied by rebel forces, and afterwards occupied by the forces of the United States, shall be deemed captives of war, and shall be forever free and not again held as slaves; that fugitive slaves should not be surrendered to persons who had given aid and comfort to the rebellion ; that no person engaged in the mill- 278 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. tary or naval service should surrender fugitive slaves on pain of being dismissed from the service, and that the President should be authorized to employ persons of African descent to suppress the rebellion, and that he might organize and use them in such manner as he might deem best for the pub lic welfare. The report was accepted, and the bill, on the 17th of July, 1862, received the approval of the President, and became a law. This approval of the President, however, was not obtained until a joint resolution had been adopted by Congress, as follows : " That the provisions of the third clause of the fifth section of 'An Act to suppress insurrection, to punish treason and rebellion, to seize and confiscate the property of rebels, and for other purposes,' shall be so construed as not to apply to any act or acts done prior to the pas sage thereof; nor to include any member of a State Legislature, or judge of any State court who has not, in accepting or entering upon his office taken an oath to support the Constitution of the so-called Confederate States of America ; nor shall any punishment or proceed ings under said act be so construed as to work a forfeiture of the real estate of the oft'ender, beyond his natural life." • This law has been justly characterized as the first great act of emancipation. Its importance has not been fully ap- . predated. How comprehensive its terms. It declares that every slave claimed or held by a rebel should be freed. There were comparatively few slaves other than those claimed by rebels. It declares that every slave who should fiee to, or take refuge within the army, should be free. The army was to carry liberty to every man who came under the flag. The President, on the day of the approval of this bill, sent to Congress a message, in which he stated that he considered the confiscation act, and the joint resolution explanatory of said act, as being substantially one, and he therefore approved and signed both. He also coraraunicated to Congress the draft of a message stating his objections to the bill, without the explanatory resolutions. This act, on the part of Mr. Lincoln, was one of the same frank and open character which always marked his intercourse with Congress. It is known, however, that he subsequently modified his views of the Dowers of Congress upon the subject of confiscation, and EMANCIPATION. 279 it is believed that a year later he would have signed the bill without the joint resolution explanatory thereof. While Congress had been discussing the great questions of emancipation and confiscation, the President had been most carefully considering the same subjects. The following resolution and action of the popular branch of the National Legislature, as well as the debates in both Houses of Congress, exhibit the rapid progress of public sentiment on the subject of slavery. On the 2d of Decem ber, 1861, Mr. Elliott offered a resolution : "Resolved, 1. That in behalf of the people of these States, we do again solemnly declare that the war in which we are engaged against the insurgent bodies now in arms against the Government, has for its object the suppression of such rebellion, and the reestablishment of the rightful authority of the National Constitution and laws over the entire extent of our common country. 2. That while we disclaim all power under the Constitution to interfere by ordinary legislation with the institutions of the several States, yet the war now existing must be conducted according to the usages and rights of military service, and that during its continuance, the recognized authority of the maxim that the safety of the State is the highest law, subordinates rights of property, and dominates over civil relations. 3. That, therefore, we do hereby declare that, in our judgment, the President of the United States, as the commander-in-chief of our army, and the officers in com mand under him, have the right to emancipate all persons held as slaves in any military district in a state of insurrection against the National Government, and that we respectfully advise that such order of emancipation be issued wherever the same will avail to weaken the power of the rebels in arms., or to strengthen the military power of the loyal forces." Which resolution, after being amended so as to insert after the word " slaves," the words " held by rebels," was, on the 17th, referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. The varied and excited discussions, bills, and numerous re solutions on the subject of emancipation, have been already alluded to. It was obvious that as the war vs^as being waged by the insurgent States to maintain slavery, and secure for it security, if slavery could be destroyed, and emancipation 280 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. accomplished, the object and end of the war would be defeated, and the war itself cease. Besides, so long as slavery was unassailed, it was a source of strength to the rebels, but with emancipation and freedom, the black popu lation would ''flock to the National standard, a!nd render it efficient aid. It is very interesting to trace the gradual advance of opin ion on the part of President Lincoln, which finally resulted in the settled conviction of the absolute necessity of emanci pation. He entered upon the Presidency, a thorough, radi cal, anti-slavery man. He believed in the irreconcilable antagonism between free and slave labor. But with these convictions, no man had a higher reverence for law; and he was by nature cautious, and a conservative reformer. He did not understand that the Presidency conferred upon hira an unrestricted right to act upon his anti-slavery feelings. No raan ever entered upon the Presidency with a more firm determination that his adminis tration should be strictly constitutional. He deprecated violent or su(iden changes. Inspired by these views, on the 6th day of March, 1862, he sent the following message to Con gress, recommending compensated and gradual emancipation. Said he : " I recommend the adoption of a joint resolution by your honorable bodies, which shall be substantially as follows : " Mesolved, That the United States ought to co-operate with any State which may adopt gradual abolishment of slavery, giving to such State pecuniary aid, to be used by such State in its discretion, to compensate for the inconvenience, pubUo and private, produced by such change of system." " If, said he, the proposition contained -in the resolution does not meet the approval of Congress and the country, there is the end ; but if it does command such approval, I deem it of importance, that the States and people immediately interested, should be at once distinctly notified of the fact, so that they may begin to consider whether to accept or reject it. The Federal Government would find its highest interest in such a measure, as one of the most efficient means of self-preservation. The leaders of the existing insurrection entertain the hope that this Gov ernment will ultimately be forced to acknowledge the independence of some part of the disaffected region, and that all the slave States north of such part will then say, ' the Union for which we have EMANCIPATION MESSAGE. 281 Struggled being already gone, we now choose to go with the Southern section.' To deprive them of this hope, substantially ends the rebel lion ; and the initiation of emancipation completely deprives them of it, as to all the States initiating it. The point is not that all the States tolerating slavery would very soon, if at all, initiate emancipation; but that, while the offer is equally made to all, the more North ern shall, by such initiation, make it certain to the more Southern, that in no event will the former ever join the latter in their proposed Con federacy. I say ' initiation,' because, in my judgment, gradual, and not sudden emancipation is better for all. In the mere financial or pecuniary view, any member of Congress, with the census tables and treasury reports before him, can readily see for himself, how very soon the current expenditures of this war would purchase, at fair valuation, all the slaves in any named State. Such a proposition, on the part of the General Government, sets up no claim of a right by Federal au thority to interfere with slavery within State limits, referring, as it does, the absolute control of the subject iu each case, to the State and its people immediately interested. It is proposed as a matter of perfectly free choice with them. "In the annual message last December, I thought fit to say 'the Union must be preserved ; and hence all indispensable means must be employed.' I said this, not hastily, but deliberately. War has been made, and continues to be an indispensable means to this end. A prac tical re-acknowledgment of the National authority would render the war unnecessary, and it would at once cease. If, however, resistance con tinues, the war must continue ; and it is impossible to foresee all the incidents which may attend, and all the ruin whjch may follow it. tuch as may seem indispensable or may obviously promise great efficiency towards ending the struggle, must, and will come. " The proposition now made, though an offer only, I hope it may be esteemed no offence to ask whether the pecuniary consideration tender ed would not be of more value to the States, and private persons con cerned than are the institution and property in it, in the present aspect of affairs ? " While it is true that the adoption of the proposed resolution would be merely initiatory, and not, within itself a practical measure, it is re commended in the hope, that it would soon lead to important practical results. In full view of my great responsibility to my God, and to my country, I earnestly beg the attention of Congress and the people to the subject. "ABRAHAM LINCOLN." 282 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Mr. Lincoln was agitating the alternative of immediate and unconditional emancipation, by his own proclamation, or gradual and compensated emancipation as proposed in the foregoing message. He deterrained to submit the subject to Congress and the border slave States, with the sincere hope, that the latter would be accepted. OHAPTEE XIII. THE PROCLAMATION OF EMANCIPATION. Emancipation Demanded by the Loyal States— Letter of Mr. Greeley — Lincoln's Reply— Interview with Chicago Clergy — Appeal op the Friends op Freedom — Mr. Lincoln Reads THE Proclamation to his Cabinet — Issued on the 22d Septem ber — Apter the Battle op Antietam — Incidents Connected -with it — How Received. TT is clear, from several paragraphs in the President's mes- -*- sage, and it is known from other sources, that the slavery question occupied Mr. Lincoln's most anxious thoughts, and that he was considering the subject of emancipation under military authority, and as a military necessity. He alludes to a paragraph in his annual message which declared " that the Union must be preserved, and hence all indispensable means must be employed. I said this not hastily but deliberately. If resistance continues, the war must continue; and it is impossible io foresee all the incidents which may attend it. Such as may seem indispensable or may obviously promise great efficiency toward ending the struggle must and will come." In these somewhat ambiguous paragraphs we now know that he alluded to the great proclamation of emancipation. It is cleaT that he considered this great question primarily, as it affected the success of the struggle in which the Nation was engaged to suppress the rebellion. If it was a proper and apt measure to effect that end, he^might rightfully adopt it, not otherwise, however much he might desire universal freedora. He himself says, "when, in March, May and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed 283 284 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that meas ure. They declined the proposition, and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, or issuing the emancipation proclamation." He honestly believed "gradual and not immediate emanci pation would be better for all." The message proposing compensated emancipation was proraptly followed by a resolution of Congress, declaring " That the United States ought to cooperate with any State which raay adopt gradual emancipation of slavery, giving to such State pecuniary aid." On the 9th of May, 1862, Gen eral David Hunter, whose zealous efforts to organize negro soldiers has already been noticed, issued an order declaring all the slaves within the States of South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, which composed his district, "forever free." This order came while Mr. Lincoln was hiraself consider ing the subject of emancipation by his own proclamation, and in the midst of his efforts to bring about gradual, and compensated emancipation in tbe border States, and without any knowledge on his part of the General's intention to issue it. He, therefore, immediately issued a proclamation de claring that such order was unauthorized. He recites the resolution of Congress, proposing cooperation and pecuniary aid to any State which might adopt gradual emancipation, ' and declared that he reserved to himself, under his responsi bility, the exercise of the power of emancipating slaves as a war measure, and which he could not feel justified in leaving to any subordinate in the field. He goes on to &&y, the re solution here referred to was adopted by a large majority in both branches of Congress, and now stands an authentic, definite and solemn proposal of the Nation to the States and people most interested in the subject matter. He then made this solemn and earnest appeal : • "To the people of these States, how, I earnestly appeal I do not argue ; I beseech you to make the argument for yourselves. You can not, if you would, be blind to the signs of the times. I beg of you a solemn and enlarged consideration of them, ranging, if it may be, far above partisan and personal politics. LINCOLN'S APPEAL TO THE BORDER STATES. 285 "This proposal makes common cause for a common object, casting no reproaches upon any one. It acts not the Pharisee. The change it contemplates would come gently, as the dews of Heaven, not rending or wrecking anything. Will you not embrace it ? So much good has not been done by any one effort in all past time, as, in the Providence of God, it is now your high privilege to do. May the vast future not have to lament that you have neglected it." In addition to the raessage sent to Congress, Mr. Lincoln invited an interview with the Congressional delegations of Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, Virginia and Delaware. In this interview, the President urged the adoption of the plan of compensated emancipation, but received little encourage ment from the representatives of the border slave States. It is well known to the President's iraraediate friends that he had nearly reached the conclusion, that if the proposition for gradual or compensated emancipation should be rejected by the border States, that military necessity would require him to proclaim emancipation. "I believed," said he after wards, " the indispensable necessity for military emancipa^ tion and arming the blacks would corae, unless averted by gradual and corapensated emancipation." How urgently he pressed the subject, appears from his proclamation in regard to General Hunter's order, and in his interview with the border State members. In July, 1862, the President called the delegates from the border slave States again together, and again made to them his earnest and solemn appeal to accept gradual compensated emancipation. This appeal, submitted to them in writing, is full of earnest expostulation, arguraent and entreaty. Viewed in the light of subsequent events, it is full of sagacity, and the most wise statesmanship. Compare this great State paper with the reply and conduct of the distinguished men whom he addressed, and learn to appreciate the statesman. After advising thera that, in his best judgraent, the represent atives of the border States held more power for good than any other equal number of merabers, he said that he intend ed no reproach, but he assured them, that in his opinion, if they had all voted for the resolution in the gradual emancipation message of March, the war would have been substantially ended. He went ou to say that — 286 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. " The plan proposed is one of the most potent and swift measures of ending the war. Let the States which are in rebellion see definitely and certainly that in no event will the States you represent ever join their proposed Confederacy, and they cannot much longer maintain the contest. But you cannot divest them of their hope to ultimately have you with them, so long as you show a determination to perpetuate the institution within your own State. Beat them at elections as you have overwhelmingly done, and, nothing daunted, they still claim you as their own. You and I know what the lever of their power is. Break that lever before their faces, and they can shake you no more forever. "Most of you have treated me with kindness and consideration, and I trust you will not now think I improperly touch what is exclusively your own, when, for the sake of the whole country, I ask, 'Can you, for your States, do better than to take the course I urge ?' Discarding ^Mracort, p. 24. t Report of the Secretary of War, p. 9. , THOMAS PREPARES TO MEET HOOD. 547 commanders in the rebel army. My information from all sources con firmed the reported strength of Hood's army to be from 40 to 45,000 in fantry, and from 12 to 15,000 cavalry. My effective force at this time, consisted of the Fourth Corps, about 12,000 under Major General D. S. Stanley, the Twenty-third Corps, about 10,000, under Major General Schofield, Hatcher's Division of cavalry about 4,000, Croxton's brigade, 25,000, and Capron's brigade of about 1,200. The balance of my force was distributed along the railroad, and posted at Mnrfreesboro, Stevenson, Bridgeport, Huntsville, Decatur, and Chattanooga, to keep open our com munications, and hold the posts above named, if attacked, until they could be reenforced; as up to this time it was impossible to determine which course Hood would take; advance on Nashville or turn towards Huntsville. Under these circumstances, it was manifestly best to act on the defensive mitil sufficiently reenforced to justify taking the offensive. On the 12th of November, communication with General Sherman was severed, the last despatch from him leaving Cartersville, Georgia, at 2.25 P. M., on that date. He had started on his great expedition from Atlanta to the seaboard, leaving me to guard Tennessee, or to pursue the enemy if he followed the Commanding General's column. It was therefore, with considerable anxiety that we watched the force at Florence, to dis cover what course they would pursue with regard to General Sherman's movements, determining thereby whether the troops under my command, numbering less than half those under Hood, were to act on the defen sive in Tennessee, or take the offensive in Alabama." Reenforcements were hastened to Thomas, and among other troops sent forward, were two divisions of veteran in fantry, under General A. J. Smith. On the 20th of Novem ber, General Schofield's main force was withdrawn from in front of Columbia, and on the morning of the 30th, a posi tion was taken at Franklin. Here followed a most fierce and bloody battle between the arraies of Hood and Schofield. General Thomas, in his report of this battle, says : " The enemy followed closely after General Schofield's rear guard in the retreat to Franklin, and upon coming up with the main force, formed rap idly and advanced to assault our works, repeating attack after attack dur ing the entire afternoon, and as late as 10 P. M., his efforts to break our lines were continued. General Schofield's position was excellently chosen with both flanks resting on the river, and his men firmly held their ground against an overwhelming enemy, who was repulsed in every assault, along the whole line. Our loss as given by General Schofield in his 548 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. report transmitted herewith, (and to which I respectfully refer,) is 189 killed, 1,033 wounded and 1,104 missing, making an aggregate of 2,326. We captured and sent to Nashville, 702 prisoners, including one general officer and thirty-three stands of colors. Major General D. S. Stanly, commanding the Fourth Corps, was severely wounded at Franklin, while engaged in rallying a portion of his command which had been temporarily overpowered by an overwhelming attack of the enemy. At the time of the battle, the enemy's loss was known to be severe, and was estimated at 5,000. The exact figures were only obtained, however, on the re-occupation of Franklin, by our forces after the battles of December 15th and 16th, at Brentwood Hills near Nashville, and are given as follows: Buried upon the field, 1,750; disabled and placed in hospitals at Franklin, 3,800; which, with the 702 prisoners already re ported, makes an aggregate loss of 6,252, among whom were six gene ral officers killed, six wounded and one captured. The important results of this signal victory cannot be too highly appreciated; for it not on-ly seriously checked the enemy's advance, and gave General Schofield time to remove his troops and all his property to Nashville, but it also caused deep depression among the men of Hood's army, making them doubly cautious in their subsequent movements." * Schofield, by direction of Thomas, retired to NashviUe, in front of which, a line of battle was formed on the 1st of De cember. Hood's army made its appearance on the 2d of December. The intense cold weather delayed operations until the 14th, when the weather having become less severe, General Thomas issued orders for an attack on Hood's army to be raade on the 15th. At an early hour the next morning, the hardy veteran soldiers of Thomas and Schofield 'moved to the attack. All day long the fight was fiercely continued; when night came, Thoraas had captured 16 pieces of artillery, 1,200 prisoners, and a large number of small arms. The enemy had everywhere been forced' back with heavy loss. The troops had fought with steadiness and courage. The whole coramand bivouacked in line of battle during the night on the ground occupied at dark, while preparations were made to renew the battle at an early hour on the mor row. At early dawn the next morning, the battle was re newed. At 3 o'clock in the afternoon, the enemy's strong position on Overton's Hill was assaulted by the Fourth Corps. • Report of the Secretary of War, 1865. BATTLE OF NASHVILLE. 549 General Smith's and Scofield's command moved against the enemy's works iu their respective fronts, carrying all before them, frequently breaking his lines in a dozen places, and capturing all his artillery and thousands of prisoners, among the latter, foiir general officers."* The Confederates broke and fled in confusion, over the tops of Brentwood HiUs, pursued by the exulting Union troops. Meanwhile, General Wil son's cavalry dismounted, and attacked siraultaneously, with Schofield and Smith. The fiying rebels were pursued several miles, until darkness rendered the further chase impracticable. During the two days battle, there were captured 4,462 prisoners, including 287 officers, 53 pieces of artillery, and thousands of small arms.f The Confederate army thus defeated, had been considered next to the army of Lee, the most forraidable rebel force which had been organized during the war. It had been ably commanded by Bragg, Johnston, and Hood, and on many bloody fields had estabUshed the courage of the soldiers and the ability of the leaders. It was pursued from Nashville to the Tennessee by Thomas' main army, and by detachments, many miles further; but this proud army never again ap peared in the field as an army organization. Fragments of it were finally gathered up, and under Johnson, laid down their arms to Sherman in the Spring of 1865, at the final surrender of Johnston. The brilliant Atlanta carapaign of Sherraan was in the plans of Grant and his Lieutenant, prelirainary. Another important step was yet to be made before the union of the grand arraies of the East and the West, by the joint and co operative raoveraents of which, Richraond was to be taken, and the arraies of Lee and Johnston captured. " When," said Sherraan, " I plant this array at Goldsboro, Lee must leave Virginia, or he will be defeated beyond hope of recovery." Jefferson Da-ris, on the 22d of September, 1864, prophe sied that Sherman's army, then in the heart of his Confeder acy, would meet " the fate of the army of the French Empire, • Thomas' Report. t Secretary of War's Report, p. 12. 550 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. in the retreat from Moscow; our cavalry and our people," said he, " will harrass and destroy his array as did the Cossacks that of Napoleon; and the Yankee General, like him, will escape with only a body guard." Little did this arrogant boaster then dream this " Tankee General," at whora he proudly sneered, would raarch ai pleasure through his Confederacy ; and that before his with drawal, he himself would be first a fugitive and then a captive, and his erapire crumbled into ruins ! As Hood marched to the North, Sherman foUowed as far as Kenesaw Mountain. At the pass of Allatoona, through which ran t'ne railway forming Sherraan's corarau nications frora which he had not yet cut loose, there was an immense depot of provisions; a milUon and a half of rations. This pass was protected by a fort manned by 1,500 men. On the morning of the 5th of October, General Sherman was on the summit of Kenesaw, watching this pass, when the faint sound of distant artillery and the puffs of white smoke told him that this important position .was assailed. The gar rison was furiously attacked by 6,000 rebels. Sherman from the top of Kenesaw, signalled the commander at Allatoona to hold out to the last, promising relief. When the answer ing signal informed hira that General Corse was there and in command, Sherman, exclaimed, " I know Corse ; as long as he lives the Allatoona pass is safe! " And so indeed it was; for although he was severely wounded early in the day, and although the rebels charged again and again, yet he held out, and beat off the attack with great slaughter of the rebels, and held the post until succor arrived. Sherman having seen Hood far on towards Tennessee, turned his back upon him, leaving hira for Thomas to dis pose of, and prepared to .start on his perilous march to the sea. He divided his army into two parts, the right and loft wings; the right, consisting of the Fifteenth and Seven teenth Corps, under Major General 0. 0. Howard, and the left, consisting of the Fourteenth and Twentieth Corps, under Major General H. W. Slocum. General Kilpatrick com manded the cavalry. The aggregate force numbered between sixty and seventy thousand picked men. Probably no superior SHERMAN STARTS FOR THE SEA. 551 body of soldiers, officers and men, was ever organized. They had faith in theraselves, and in their leader. Frora Atlanta to the sea, there ran two nearly parallel liues of raUway; one leading to Charleston, South CaroUna, and the other to Savannah, Georgia. The road to Charleston from Atlanta, was 308 miles long, while that to Savannah was 293 miles. On the llth of November, Sherman telegraphed from Kingston to Chattanooga, " all is well," then ordered the wires to be cut and started for the ocean. He would probably be heard from next from the sea coast. On the evening of the 15th of November, the torch was applied to the raachine shops, store houses, and depot build ings of Atlanta. The band of the Thirty-third Massachu setts was playing the air " John Brown's soul is marching on" by the light of the blazing buildings of this city, which, next to Richmond, had been considered the most iraportant strong hold of the slaveholding Confederacy. The array marched eastward towards Macon, the cavalry covering its flanks. As it advanced, it destroyed the railroads, and everything which could be of value to the Confederates. Sherman reached and occupied Milledgeville, the Capital of Georgia, without any serious opposition. By skillful raaneouvres, he deceived the enemy as to his real purpose, and induced thera to concen trate far away frora his line of march, so that he reached Savannah without difficulty or loss. Savannah was held by General Hardee, with 15,000 troops. The City was invested, and scouts sent down the river to find the fleet, which was known to be on the coast, watching for Sherman's arrival. The fleet was found, and the news ex pressed to the North that Sherman had got through and all was well. To open coraraunication between his army and the fleet, it was necessary for Sherman to capture Fort McAllister which commanded the approaches from the sea. On the 13th of December, a column under the gallant General Hazen, attacked and carried the fort by assault. The communica tions with the fleet were opened; General Sherman went immediately on board, and sent his first despatch to the Secretary of War, announcing his complete success. The investment of Savannah now proceeded so rapidly, that by 052 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. the 20th, Hardee was compelled to save the garrison by flight. He burned the rebel iron clads, and such stores and material, as in his rapid flight he was able to destroy, and on the 21st of December, Sherman entered the city, and on the 22d, he sent to President Lincoln the following despatch : " I beg to present to you as a Christmas gift, the City of Savannah, with 150 guns, plenty of ammunition, and about 25,000 bales of cotton." Thus ended Sherman's grand march to the sea! This inarch is already a part of the romance of history. With the steady, resistless force of the glacier; with the over whelming power of the avalanche, Sherman descended from the North, crushing everything in his path frora the moun tains to the sea. Then, turning again towards the North, that, grand Northwestern army, cooperating with the long tried veterans of Grant, crushed the fragments of the rebellion between the opposing forces. Five weeks from the time he left Atlanta, with a total loss of less than 1,500 men, he marched through the great State of Geo.rgia, called the " Empire State of the South," occu pying its capital, destroying its railroads, and now rested his victorious soldiers in its chief city. It is not recorded that the haughty Toombs, Iverson, and other slaveholders who were accustomed to exhibit the arrogance and swagger of the slave overseer in Congress, were heard of by Sherman in his easy march through their State. Sherman appropriated and destroyed the corn and forage for thirty miles on either side of a line from Atlanta to Savannah, and also " all the sweet potatoes, cattle, hogs, sheep, and poultry, and carried away more than ten thousand horses and mules, as well as a vast number of their slaves." The belt of country through which Sherman marched, was full of negroes, and the Gene ral invited all the able bodied men to join the column, and he took especial pleasure in teUing them they were free; that Massa Lincoln had given them their liberty, and that they could go where they pleased.* * Sherman's Report. 'Vide Nichols' Story of the Great March, p. 61, and 82. THE ALABAMA AND THE KEARSAROE. 553 The negroes already understood that the Proclamation of Emancipation had made them free. They regarded the ad vent of the " Yankee," as the fulfiUment of the millenial prophesies. " The day of Jubilee," the hope and prayer of a life tirae, had come. They had the most perfect trust and confidence in their deliverers. One day, a woraan -with a child in her arras was working her way araong the tearas, crowds of cattle, and horseraen. An officer called kindly to her: " Where are you going auntie?" She looked up with a hopeful, beseeching look and replied, " Ise gwine whar youse gwine, raassa." * The colored people manifested a forgiving spirit towards their late masters, and a docile, obedient spirit towards those who set thera free. One of thera said to Sherraan " we don't wish to do anything wrong. We know you carae here to set us free, and we expect you to tell us what to do. Some of these masters have treated us shamefully ; whipped, impris oned, and sold us about, but we don't wish tobe revenged on thera. The Bible says we must forgive our enemies. They have been our eneraies ,and we forgive them. Thank God we are slaves no longer !" * Nothing occurred during the war which more incensed the the American people, than the ravages upon their commerce by the English built cruisers, sailing under the rebel fiag. By avoiding all armed antagonists, they roaraed the sea with impunity, robbing and destroying American merchantmen, and finding refuge and protection, and very often supplies, in neutral ports, and especially in those of Great Britain. The inost destructive of these cruisers were the the Alabama, Florida andi the Georgia, Early in June, 1864, the, J.fa;6ama, after a successful cruise among the Araerican Merchant ships of the South Atlantic, returned to Northern waters and put into Cherbourg, France. The -Kearsar^e, Captain John A. Winslo-vv commanding, imraediately sailed for Cherbourg. On the 15th of June, Captain Seraraes of the Alabama, knowing escape was impossible, with characteristic bravado, sent a note to Cap tain Winslow, asking him not to depart until the two vessels * Nichols' Grand March * Nichols' Story of the Great March, page 108. 654 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. could meet, and expressing a desire to fight the Kearsarge ! Winslow had come for the purpose, had been long in pursuit of the Alabama, and had no intention of aUowing the Ala bama to escape, as Semmes very well knew. The Alabama having prepared herself at leisure for the confiict, on the 19th of June came out of the harbor. She was foUowed by the English Steam Yacht Deerhound, to act as her tender, and to be ready to receive her officers in case of disaster. The Alabama opened at long range, to which the Kearsarge made no reply, but steaming directly for the Alabama, sought close quarters. In a short time the Alabama hung out a white flag, and Winslow reserved his fire, but the Alabama again opening her fire, she received another broadside. She was then abandoned by her commander. The Deerhound picked up Semmes and his oflicers and steamed off with thera, Wins low and his crew, too busy in picking up the drowning crew of the Alabama, to prevent her. The Alabama in a few mo ments went down, even before all the wounded could be ' saved. Semmes, conscious of the danger to which his irregular proceedings after his surrender would subject him in case of capture, got on board the Deerhound, which immediately steamed for the friendly port of Southampton, Great Britain. This fight was so near the French coast that thousands of spectators on the shore witnessed the triumph of the Ameri can fiag, and the speedy sinking of the English-rebel ship. The Florida was captured by Captain H. Collins of the Wachusett on the 6th of October, in the Bay of San Salva dor, Brazil. She was brought to Hampton Roads and acci-" dentally sunk. The Georgia was captured by the Niagara, on the 15th of August. Admiral Farragut was, in the summer of 1864, in comraand of the squadron off Mobile ; and late in July received an ad dition of four raonitors to his fleet. The principal entrance to Mobile Bay was defended by Forts Gained and Morgan. There were also Fort Powell, a water battery, and earth works. Inside were Confederate iron-clads. On the 5th of August, Admiral Farragut made his preparations for attack. In order to obtain an unobstructed view, and to give his FARRAGUT AT MOBILE. 555 orders with clearness, he ascended to the main-top of his fiag- ship the Hartford, and moved forward to the attack. The conflict was most furious and terrific. One of the monitors, the Tecumseh, commanded by the brave Craven, struck a tor pedo, and sunk, carrying down her gallant commander and nearly all onboard. Still the indomitable Farragut steamed in and passed the forts. The rebel fleet was destroyed or dis abled, except the iron-clad ram Tennessee. This boldly bore down upon the flag-ship, the Hartford. The fleet was di rected to run her down. The Hartford was the third ship which struck her; but as the Tennessee shifted her helm, the blow was a glancing one, and as she rasped along side of Far- ragut's ship, he poured iu a whole broadside of nine inch solid shot, "within ten feet of her casement."* The Hartford was again approaching, when the Tennessee struck her colors. She was undoubtedly the strongest vessel ever constructed by the Confederates, and she was most gal lantly fought. The victory of Farragut over the fleet was followed by the surrender of Forts Gaines and Powell. Fort Morgan still held out, but on being invested by General Granger, on the 23d, this last of the rebel defenses of Mobile, unconditionally surrendered. This brief review of the mil itary operations of 1864, which has been given, exhibits the progress of the Union arms. The heavy, continuous pound ing of Grant upon the armies under Lee, the sledge-hammer, crushing blows he gave, the brilliant raarches and victories of Sherman, the rapid, dashing triumphs of Sheridan, and the successes of the Navy, culminating with this characteristic exploit of Farragut, gave joy and confidence to the loyal people throughout the republic. It was a significant fact that the President had for some time issued official an nouncements of victory " to the friends of Union and Lib erty." * In his judgmentthese were becoming more and more identical. Proclamations of thanksgiving and gratitude to God were issued, the President was buoyant with hope, aud obviously encouraged in the belief of an early termination of the war. In foUowing the grand miUtary campaigns of 1864, • Vide Farragut's Report. * President's Proclamation of May 4, 1864. 656 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. some important events in connection with the President and the war, have been omitted. It was during the sumraer of 1864, and before the victories we have raentioned had relieved the anxiety of the people, that Mr. Lincoln was induced by Mr. Greeley to have sorae correspondence with Confederate agents in Canada. The Confederates were represented by Messrs. C. C. Clay of Alabama, James B. Holcombe of Vir ginia, and George N. Saunders. These eramissaries were there for purposes, and raoveraents, sorae of which were of a character entirely outside of the legitimate operations of war. Expeditions to rob and plunder banks, over the border, to fire Northern cities, have been clearly traced to them, and there is evidence tending to connect them with crimes of a still graver, and darker character. By some raeans, they suc ceeded in creating the irapression upon that good, but some what credulous and sometiraes indiscreet raan, Horace Greeley, that these agents were deserving of attention, and that it would be wise to confer with thera. He wrote to the Presi dent on the 7th of July, a letter in which he said : * " I venture to remind you that our bleeding, bankrupt, almost dying country also longs for peace — shudders at the prospect of fresh con scriptions, of further wholesale devastations; and of new rivers of human blood. * * * "I fear Mr. President, you do not realize how intently the people desire any peace, consistent with tbe National integrity and honor, and how joyously they would hail its achievement and bless its authors." He begged and entreated Mr. Lincoln to extend safe con duct to the rebel eraissaries, then at Niagara, that they might exhibit their credentials and submit their ultimatum. Mr. Lincoln believed at that time, that the best means of obtain ing peace, was by destroying the rebel armies. That Grant, and Sherman, Sheridan and Farragut, were doing more to bring it about, than could be accomplished by any negotia tions to which he was thus so urgently entreated. He doubted whether these agents had any authority; but Mr. Greeley was a prominent political friend, a man of the purest and most * Raymond s Life of Lincoln, etc., p. 672-3. NIAGARA FALLS CONFERENCE. 557 patriotic purposes, and Mr. Lincoln, thought he would con vince him of his own desire for peace, and expose what he believed to be the deceptive character of these agents. He therefore in reply to Mr. Greeley, said : " If you can find any person, anywhere, professing to have any propo sition of Jefferson Davis, in writing, for peace, embracing the restoration of the Union, and abandonment of slavery, whatever else it embraces; say to him he may come to me with you." In another letter the President said, " I not only intend a sincere effort for peace, but ihat you shall be a personal witness ihat ii is made." Mr. Greeley, on the 13th of July, wrote again to the President, saying: " I have now information on which I can rely, that two persons, duly commissioned and empowered to negotiate for peace, are at this moment not far from Niagara Falls, in Canada, and are desirous of conferring ¦with yourself, or with such persons as you may appoint and empower to treat with them." He then gave their names, etc. It turned out that Mr. Greeley had been entirely deceived. That the rebel agents in Canada had no authority whatever to treat for peace. Mr. Greeley, on the 18th of July, says: "I have communicated with the gentlemen in question and do noi find them so em powered as J was previously assured." But he seems to be unconcious of the deception practised upon him, and still desirous that that they should be permitted to visit Washing ton under the President's safe conduct. Mr. Lincoln, des patched his private Secretary, Major Hay, to New York, with the following note : " Executive Mansion, July 18, 1864. " To whom it may concern : " Any proposition which embraces the restoration of peace, the in tegrity of the whole Union, and the abandonment of slavery, and which comes by and with the authority that can control the armies now at war against the United States, will be received and considered by the Exec- i utive Government of the United States, and will be mefrby liberal terms on other substantial, and collateral points, and the bearer or bearers thereof, shall have safe conduct both ways. "ABRAHAM LINCOLN." 558 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Mr. Greeley was authorized by Mr. Lincoln in his letter of July 9th, to tender the Confederate agents safe conduct, only upon the condition that they professed to have a proposition of Jefferson Davis in writing, for peace, embracing the restoration of the Union, and abandonment of slavery. But it seems he did not communicate this to the rebel agents. Mr. Greeley was entrapped, and did not discover it. Mr. Lincoln, feeling the injustice which a partial publication of this correspond ence did to him, and to the country, asked Mr. Greeley to permit the whole correspondence to be published, omitting certain passages in Mr. Greeley's letters which were calcu lated in his judgment, to injure and depress the country. Mr. Greeley decUned, unless the whole was pubUshed, and Mr. Lincoln with characteristic magnanimity, subraitted in silence to the injustice, writing the foUowing letter to Mr. Rayraond: * "Executive Mansion, Washington, August 15, 1864. " "Hon. Henry J. Raymond: " My Dear Sir: — I have proposed to Mr. Greeley that the Niagara correspondence be published, suppressing only the parts of his letters over which the red pencil is drawn in the copy, which I herewith send. He declines giving his consent to the publication of his letters, unless these parts be published with the rest. I have concluded that it is bet ter for me to submit for the time, to the consequences of the false posi tion in which I consider he has placed me, than to subject the country to the consequences of publishing these discouraging and injurious parts. I send you this, and the accompanying copy, not for publication, but merely to explain to you, and that you may preserve Ihem until their proper time shall come." " Yours truly, "ABRAHAM LINCOLN." The rebels, under John Morgan, made a desperate raid into Kentucky, and although checked and defeated by Gen eral Burb ridge at Cynthiana, received so much encourageraent and syrapathy frora the citizens, that Mr. Lincoln felt com pelled to suspend the writ of Habeas Corpus, and declare martial law in that State. • Raymond's Life of Lincoln, p, 5S7. - PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 1864. 559 The Presidential election approached, coining now in the midst of a civil war, which wrapt the whole country, and aroused everywhere the raost intense and violent passions; it was felt that it was a fearful ordeal through which the country must pass. The Confederates stUl held their Capital; three great rebel armies stiU held the field; the public debt was steadily and rapidly increasing. Under the pressure of an imperative miUtary necessity, the administration had used its Constitutional right of suspending the Habeas Corpus, the great safeguard of civil liberty; aad dealt with individuals deemed dangerous, with a severity as absolute as the most energetic governments of Europe had been accustomed to do in tirae of war. Taxes were increasing; the President or dered new drafts to fill up the ranks of the decimated armies. But yet victory, a restored Union, and universal liberty, began to be clearly visible as the results. The demo cratic party availed itself of every means to secure popular favor and success at the elections. It was in the midst of the confiict, when the administration was straining every nerve to crush the rebellion, that the Democratic National Convention had raet at Chicago, and declared the war a fail ure, and deraanded that iraraediate efforts be made for a cessation of hostilities, etc. The foUowing is the iraportant resolution upon which the election turned. " Resolved, That this Convention does explicitly declare, as the sense of American people, that a-iter four years of failure to restore the Union hy the experiment of war, during which, under the pretense of military necessity, or war power, higher than the Constitution, the Constitution itself has been disregarded in every part, and public liberty and private right alike trodden down, and the material prosperity of the country essentially impaired; justice, humanity, hberty, and the public welfare deniand that immediate efforts he made for a cessation of hostil ities, with a view to an ultimate Convention of the States or other peace able m^eans, to the end ihat, at the earliest practicable moment peace may be restored on the basis of the Federal Union of the States." * The Union War party joyfully accepted the issue thus boldly tendered. With this frank avowal, they did not doubt • Raymond's Life of Lincoln, p. 592. 560 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. the result, and they prosecuted the canvass -with energy and confldence. Whether the war should go on with vigor, to the complete and final overthrow of slavery and the rebellion, or whether hostilities should cease, was the condition of the canvass. With this great and overshadowing issue, the peo ple cared little for the wrangling over the petty questions which arise in a Presidential canvass. The President sought no disguise that the war was now "for liberty and 'Union." He said during the canvass to a citizen of the West, in substance : " There are now in the service of the Uuited States nearly two hundred thousand colored men, most of them under arms. The Democratic strategy demands that these forces be disbanded, and that the masters be conciliated by restoring them to slavery. The black men who now fight for us, and who assist Union pris oners to escape, are to be converted into our enemies in the vain hope of gaining the good will of their masters." " Take" said he, " 200,000 men from our side, and put them in the battle-field or corn-field against us, and we would be corapelled to abandon the war. There are men base enough to propose to me to return to slavery our black warriors of Port Hudson and Olustee, and thus win the respect of the masters they fought!" " Should I do so?" said he, with indignation glow ing in every feature, " I should deserve to be daraned in tirae and in eternity. Come what may," said he, " I will keep my faith with the black man. Freedora has given us 200,000 men raised on Southern soil. It will give us more. No human power can subdue this rebellion without the eraancipation policy. / will abide the issue." He did abide the issue, and the glorious cause of liberty, blessed by God, and sustained by the people, triuraphed. The victories of Sheridan and Sherman, Farragut and Grant re-acted upon the people, and sweUed the majority by which Lincoln was reelected.. He received all the electoral votes given, except those of three States, New Jersey, Delaware and Kentucky. His majority on the popular vote was more than 400,000, a larger raajority than was ever before given for any Presidential candidate. Those who feared the ordeal of a popular election in the raidst of the passions of civil war, were corapelled to acknowledge PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 1864. 561 the calraness, the wisdom and dignity with which the Ameri can people passed through this crisis. They came out of it stronger, raore resolute, and raore united than ever before. An observing world was compelled to acknowledge this people capable of self governraent. At a late hour on the night of the election, Mr. Lincoln was serenaded, and in response, said : " I am thankful to God for this approval of the people. But while deeply grateful for this mark of their confidence in me, if I know my own heart, my gratitude is free from any taint of personal triumph. I do not impugn the motives of any one opposed to me. It is not in my nature to triumph over any one, but I give thanks to Almighty God for this evidence of the people's resolution to stand by free government and the rights of humanity." 36 CHAPTER XX T. THE SECOND SESSION OF THE 38TH CONGRESS— CONSTITUTIONAL ARJENDMENT ABOLISHING AND PROHIBITING SLAVERY THROUGH OUT THE REPUBLIC. The President's Message — Anti-Slavery measures — A Bust FOR Chief Justice Taney — Salmon P. Chase appointed Chief Justice — -The Constitutional Amendment — Passage OF THE joint RESOLUTION THROUGH CONGRESS — RATIFICATION THEREOF BY THE STATES. WE now come to the Second Session of the 38th Congress, and the last Annual Message of President Lincoln. Congress had never before during his administration, opened under such happy auspices. Victories in the East and in the West, and increasing and accumulating evidence of the ex haustion of the Confederacy, indicated the early triumph of the Union cause. Mr. Lincoln had just been re-elected by a majority unprecedented; thereby staraping upon his admin istration the approval of the people. The Emancipation Proclamation, the eraployraent of negro soldiers, and the Constitutional Araendraent prohibiting slav ery, had been distinctly presented to the people, aud had re ceived their emphatic approval. It was under these cheer ing circumstances that in Deceraber 1864, Congress met and received frora Abraham Lincoln his last Annual Message. He commenced this pecuUarly interesting State paper, by ex pressing the " profoundest gratitude to Almighty God." The careful student of Mr. Lincoln's State papers, and other writings will observe a constantly increasing religious senti- ment||fxhibiting itself Especially is this discernible after the death of his idolized son Willie, in February, 1862. 562 president's message, 1864. 563 After reviewing the relations of the United States with other nations, he announced the opening of the ports of Norfolk, Fernandina, and Pensacola. Then aUuding to the Arguelles case, in which a slave-trader seeking asylum in the United States had been surrendered to Spain, he said : "For myself I have no doubt of the power and duty of the Exec utive under the laws of nations to exclude enemies of the human race from an asylum in the United States. If Con gress should think that proceedings in such case lack the au thority of law, or ought to be further regulated by it, I re comraend that provision be made for effectually preventing foreign slave traders from acquiring doraicil and facilities for, their crirainal occupation in this country. He then called attention to the circurastances which had induced him to give notice to the Government of Great Bri tain, of the termination of the treaty stipulation of 1817, which had liraited the number of armed vessels on the Great Lakes. " In view of the insecurity of life in the region adjacent to the Can ada border by recent assaults and depredations committed by inimical and desperate persons who are harbored there, it has been thought proper to give notice that after the expiration of six months, the period conditionally stipulated in the existing arrangements with Great Britain the United States must hold themselves at liberty to increase their naval armament upon the Lakes, if they shall find that proceeding nec essary. The condition of the border will necessarily come into consid eration in connection with the question of continuing or modifying the rights of transit from Canada through the United States, as well as the regulation of imports, which were temporarily estabUshed by the Reci procity Treaty of the 5th of June, 1854." He then proceeds to speak of the very iraportant subject' of finance, andthe receipts and expenditures of Governraent. He " The legislation of the last session of Congress has beneficially ef fected the revenue. Although sufficient time has not yet elapsed to ex perience the full effect of several of the provisions of the acts of Con- gross imposing increased taxation, the receipts during the year from all sources, upon the basis of warrants signed by the Secretary of the 564 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Treasury, including loans and the balance in the treasury, on the 1st day of July, 1863, were $1,394,796,007 62, and the aggregate disburse ments upon the same basis were $1,298,056,191 89, leaving a balance in the treasury, as shown by warrants, of $96,739,905 73. Deduct from these amounts the amount of the principle of the pubhc debt re deemed, and the amount of issues in substitution therefor, and the ac tual cash operations of the treasury were receipts, $884,076,646.77, disbursements $865,234,087.86, which leaves a cash balanqe in the treasury of $18,842,558.71. Of the receipts, there were derived from customs, $102,316,152.99 ; from lands, $588,333.29 ; from direct tax es, $575,648,96; from internal revenues, $109,741,134.10; from mis cellaneous sources, $47,511,448.10; and from loans applied to actual expenditures, including former balance, $623,443,929.13. There were disbursed, for the civil service, $27,505,579.46 ; for pensions and In dians, $7,517,930.97 ; forthe War Department, $60,791,842.97; for the Navy Department, $85,733,292.97 ; for interest of the public debt, $52,685,421.69. Making an aggregate of $865,234,087.86 and leav ing a balance in the treasury of $18,842,558.71, as before stated." Of the public debt he says : "The public debt from the 1st day of July last, as appears from the books of the Treasury, amounted to one billion, seven hundred and forty million, six hundred and ninety thousand, four hundred and eighty- nine dollars, and forty-nine cents. Probably should the war continue for another year, that amount may be increased by not far from five hundred millions. Held as it is, for the most part by our own people, it has become a substantial branch of National, though private prop erty. For obvious reasons the more nearly this property can be dis tributed among all the people the better. To favor such general dis tribution, greater inducements to become owners, perhaps might with good effect and without injury, be presented to persons with limited means. With this view I suggest whether it might not be both expe dient and competent for Congress to provide that a limited amount of some future issue of public securities might not be held, by any hona- fide purchaser, exempt from taxation, and of seizure from debt, under such restrictions and limitations as might be necessary to guard against abuse of so important a privilege. This would enable prudent persons to set aside a small annuity against a possible day of want. Privileges hke these would render the possession of such securities to the amount hmited, most desirable to any person of small means who might be able to save enough for the purpose. The great advantage of citizens being president's message, 1864. 565 creditors as well as debtors with relation to the public debt, is obvious. Men readily perceive that they cannot be much oppressed by a debt which they owe to themselves. The public debt on the 1st day of July last, although somewhat exceeding the estimate of the Secretary of the Treasury made to Congress at the commencement of last ses sion, falls short of the estimate of that officer made in the preceding December, as to its probable amount at the beginning of this year, by the sum of $3,995,079.33. This fact exhibits a satisfactory condition and conduct of the operations of the treasury." Of the National Banking System, the great financial measure of Mr. Chase, he says : " The national banking system is proving to be acceptable to capital ists and to the people. On the 25th day of November, five hundred and eighty-four national banks had been organized, a considerable number of which were conversions from State banks. Changes from the State system to the national system are rapidly taking place, and it is hoped that very soon there will be in the United States no banks of issue not authorized by Congress, and no bank-note circulation not se cured by the Government. That the Government and the people will derive general benefits from this change in the banking system of the country, can hardly be questioned. The national system will create a reliable and permanent influence in support of the national credit, and protect the people against losses in the use of paper money. Whether or not any further legislation is advisable for the suppression of State bank issues, it will be for Congress to determine. It seems quite clear that the Treasury cannot be satisfactorily conducted, unless the Gov ernment can exercise a restraining power over the bank-note circulation of the country. Referring to the report of the Secretary of War, for the details of the operations of the Army and of the Navy, he " The report of the Secretary of the Navy presents a comprehen sive and satisfactory exhibit of the affairs of that department and of the naval service. It is a subject of congratulation and laudable pride to our countrymen, that a navy of such proportions has been organized in so brief a period, and conducted with so much efficiency and suc cess. The general exhibit of the navy, including vessels under con struction on the 1st of December, 1864, shows a total of 671 vessels, 566 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. carrying 4,610 guns, and 510,396 tons, being an actual increase during the year over and above all losses by shipwreck or in battle, of 83 ves sels, 167 guns, and 42,427 tons. The total number of men at this time in the naval service, including officers, is about 51,000. There have been captured by the navy during the year 324 vessels, and the whole number of naval captures since hostilities commenced is 1,379, of which 267 are steamers." After alluding to the rapid sale and settlement of the pub lic lands, notwithstanding the war, and the rapid progress of the great Pacific railway, he comes to the all-absorbing subject of the war. He says : " The war continues. Since the last annual message, all the import- a,nt Hnes and positions then occupied by our forces have been main tained, and our armies have steadily advanced, thus liberating the regions left in the rear ; so that Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, and parts of other States, have again produced reasonably fair crops. " The most remarkable feature in the military operations of the year is General Sherman's attempted march of three hundred miles, directly through an insurgent region. It tends to show a great increase of our relative strength, that our General-in Chief should feel able to con front and hold in check every active force of the enemy, and yet to detach a well-appointed large army to move on such an expedition. The result not yet being known, conjecture in regard to it cannot here be indulged." Of the progress towards reconstruction, " moulding so ciety for durability in the Union," as he terras it in his own most significant phraseology, he says " although these move ments are short of complete success, it is much in the right direction that 12,000 citizens in the States of Arkansas and Louisiana have organized loyal state Governments, with free constitutions, and are earnestly sti'uggling to maintain and administer them. The movements in the same direction, more extensive, though less definite in Missouri, Kentucky and Tennessee, should not be overlooked. " But Maryland," he says, exultingly, " presents an example of complete suc cess. Maryland is secure to liberty and Union for all the future. The genius of rebellion will no more claim Mary- land; Uke another foul spirit being driven out, it may seek to tear her, but it will w'oo her no more." president's message, 1864. 667 Upon the pending question of the proposed constitutional amendment abolishing slavery, the question of all others of overshadowing importance, he says : " At the last session of Congress, a proposed amendment of the con stitution, abolishing slavery throughout the United States, passed the Senate, but failed for the lack of the requisite two-thirds vote in the House of Representatives. Although the present is the same Con gress, and nearly the same members, and without questioning the wisdom or patriotism of those who stood in opposition, I venture to recommend the reconsideration and passage of the measure at the present session. Of course the abstract question is not changed, but an intervening election shows almost certainly that the next Congress will pass the measure, if this does not. Hence there is only a question of time as to when the proposed amendment will go to the States for their action, and as it is to go at all events, may we not agree that the sooner the better ? It is not claimed that the election has imposed a duty on mem bers to change their views or their votes, any further than as an addi tional element to be considered. Their judgment may be affected by it. It is the voice of the people now for the first time heard upon the question In a great national crisis like ours, unanimity of action among those seeking a common end is very desirable — almost indispensable ; and yet no approach to such unanimity is attainable unless some defer ence shall be paid to the will of the majority. In this case the com mon end is the maintenance of the Union, and among the means to secure that end, such will, through the election, is most clearly declared in favor of such constitutional amendment. The most reliable indica tion of public purpose in this country is derived through our popular elections. Judging by the recent canvass and its results, the purpose of the people within the loyal States to maintain the integrity of the Union, was never more firm or more nearly unanimous than now. The extraordinary calmness and good order with which the millions of vot ers met and mingled at the polls, gives strong assurance of this. Not only all those who supported the Union ticket (so called,) but a great majority of the opposing party also, may be fairly claimed to entertain and to be actuated by the same purpose. It is an unanswerable argu ment to this effect that no candidate for any office whatever, high or low, has ventured to seek votes on the avowal that he was for giving up the Union. There has been much impugning of motives, and much heated controversy as to the proper means and best mode of advancing the Union cause; but in the distinct issue of Union or no Union, the politicians have shown their instinctive knowledge that there is no diver- 668 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. sity among the people. In affording the people a fair opportunity of showing one to another, and to the world, their firmness and unan imity of purpose, the election has been of vast value to the Union cause." Upon the question of how far the Republic had been ex hausted by the war in men and resources, he makes the fol io-wing interesting and striking statements : " The election has exhibited another fact, not less valuable to be known — the fact that we do not approach exhaustion in the most im portant branch of the national resources— that of Uving men. While it is melancholy to refiect that the war has filled so many graves, and caused mourning to so many hearts, it is some rehef to know that, compared with the surviving, the fallen brave have been so few. While corps and divisions and regiments have formed and fought and dwin dled and gone out of existence, a great majority of the men who com posed them are still living. The same is true of the naval service. The election returns prove this. So many voters could not else be found. The States regularly holding elections, both now and four years ago — to wit : California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermant, West Virginia, and Wisconsin — cast 3,982,011 votes now, against 3,870,222 cast then; showing an aggregate now of 3.982,011, to which is to be added 33,762 cast now in the new States of Kansas and Nevada, which States did not vote in I860 ; thus swelling the aggregate to 4,015,773, and the net increase, during the three and a half years of war, to 145,551. A table is ap pended, showing particulars. To this again should be added the numbers of all soldiers in the field belonging to Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Delaware, Indiana, Illinois, and California, who by the laws of those States could not vote away from their homes, and which number cannot be less than 90,000. Nor yet is this all. The number in organized Territories is triple now what it was four years ago, while thousands, white and black, join us as the national arms press back the insurgent lines. So much is shown affirmatively and negatively by the election. It is not material to inquire how the increase has been pro duced, or to show that it would have been greater but for the war, which is probably true. The important fact remains demonstrated that we have more men now than we had when the war began ; that we are not exhausted, nor in process of exhaustion ; that we are gaining president's message. 569 strength, and may, if need be, maintain the contest indefinitely. This as to men. Comparative Vote, 1860 and 1864. 1860. 1864. Kentucky 148,216 91,300 Maine 97,918 115,141 Maryland..... 92,502 ' 72,703 Massachusetts 169,533 175,487 Michigan 154,747 162,412 Minnesota 34,799 42,534 Missouri 165,538 90,000 NewHampshhe 65,953 69,111 New Jersey 121,125 128,680 New York 675,156 730,661 Ohio 442,441 470,745 Oregon 14,410 f 14,410 Pennsylvania 476 442 572,697 Rhode Island 19,931 22,187 Vermont 42,844 55,811 West Virginia 46,195 33,874 Wisconsin 152,180 148,513 Total 3,870,222 3,982,011 Kansas 17,234 Nevada 16,528 33,762 Total 4,015,713 Material resources are now more complete and abundant than ever. The national resources, then, are unexhausted, and, as we believe, in exhaustible. The public purpose to re-establish and maintain the national authority is unchanged, and, as we believe unchangeable." He then goes on to say that the issue with the rebel lead ers could only be decided by war, and victory. Negotiation was useless. On this point he said : " On careful consideration of all the evidence accessible, it seems to me that no attempt at negotiation with the insurgent leader could result in any good. He would accept of nothing short of the severance of the Union. His declarations to this effect are explicit and oft repeated. He does not attempt to deceive us. He affords us no excuse to deceive ourselves. ^ • Nearly. t Estimated. 570 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. We cannot voluntarily yield it. Between him and us the issue is dis tinct, simple, and inflexible. It is an issue which can only be tried by war, and decided by victory. If we yield, we are beaten. If the South ern people fail him, heis beaten. Either way, it would be the victory and defeat following war. What is true, however, of him who heads the insurgent cause, is not necessarily true of those who follow. Al- thougli he cannot reaccept the Union, they can. Some of them we know already desire peace and reunion. The number of such may in crease. They can at any moment have peace, simply by laying down their arms and submitting to the national authority under the Consti tution. After so much the Government could not, if it would, main tain war against them. The loyal people would not sustain or allow it. If questions should remain,, we would adjust them by the peaceful means of legislation, conference, courts, and votes, operating only in constitutional and lawful channels. Some certain and other possible questions are, and would be beyond the executive power to adjust — as, for instance, the admission of members into Congress, and whatever might require the appropriation of money. The executive power it self would be greatly diminished by the cessation of actual war. Par dons and remissions of forfeiture, however, would still be within the executive control. In what spirit and temper this control would be exercised, can be fairly judged of by the past. A year ago general pardon and amnesty upon specified terms, were offered to all except certain designated classes, and it was at the same time made known that the excepted classes were still within contemplation of special clemency. During the year many availed themselves of the general provision, and many more would, only that the signs of bad faith in some led to such precautionary measures as rendered the practical process less easy and certain. During the same time, also, special pardons have been granted to individuals of excepted classes, and no voluntary application has been denied. " Thus practically the door has been for a full year open to all, except Buch as were not in condition to make free choice — that is such as were in custody or under constraint. It is still so open to all ; but the time may come, probably will come, when public duty shall demand that it be closed, and that in lieu more vigorous measures than heretofore shall be adopted." He closes this wise and statesman-like message, in the following memorable words; words the more they are pon dered by the Araerican people, in the light of the present. THE president's MESSAGE. 671 the more deep will be the regret that this great and good man, was not permitted himself to finish the work of restoring the Union. " In presenting " says he, " the aban donment of armed resistance to the National authority on the part of the insurgents, as the only indispensable condition on the part of the Governraent to peace, I retract nothing heretofore said as to slavery. I repeat the declaration made a year ago, that while I remain in my present position, I shall noi attempt to retract or modify ihe Emancipation Proclamation ; nor shall I retum io slavery any person who is free by the terms of that proclamation, or by any of the acts of Congress." Rather than do this he would retire from the office of President. " If the people " said he, " should by whatever mode or means, make it an Executive duty to reenslave such persons, another, and not I, must be their instrument to perform it. In stating a single condition of peace, I raean siraply to say, that the war will cease on the part of the Governraent, whenever it shall have ceased on the part of those who began it." This session of Congress went forward with the work of remo-ring from the Statute book, all laws which had been passed for the support and maintenance of slavery, and creat ing disabilities on the part of the negro race. A law was enacted providing that no person should thereafter be dis qualified from carrying the United States' mails on account of color. At this session, the law finally passed and received the prompt approval of the President, giving freedom to the families of colored soldiers. Senator Wilson, Chairman of the Committee on Military Affairs, speaking of the resolution, said: " The committee have three times reported the substance of this resolution. It simply provides that the wives and children of soldiers of the Republic shall be made free. The needs of the country have placed weapons in the hands of the slaves. They are to-day in the trenches before Richraond and Petersburg, and on the shores of the Carolinas; and they keep watch and ward over the Mississippi from Cairo, to the Gulf, They are everywhere doing their duty bravely and well. Butler 672 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. and Banks, Meade and Burnside, Warren, Hancock, and Grant have all borne testimony to their fidelity, their cour age, and their services. It is estimated that from 75,000 to 100,000 persons, -wives and children of these soldiers, are held in slavery. It is a burning sharae to the country ; it is an indecency to the Araerican people, to hold the wives and children in slavery, of men who are perilling their lives for the country." The joint resolution making free the wives and children of colored soldiers, passed the House on the 22d of February, 1865. Senator Trumbull, Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, of the Senate, on the 23d of February, moved to proceed to the consideration of the bill, which had been re ported from that coramittee, providinsc for a bust of the late Chief Justice Taney to be placed in the Supreme Court roora. Mr. Suraner objected that an eraancipated country should make a bust to the author of the Dred Scott decision. Senator Trumbull said: "He (Taney,) was a great, and learned, and an able man, and he trusted the Senate would take up and pass the bill.* Mr. Sumner in reply, said : • The Senator from Illinois says that this idea ot a bust is not to be hooted down Let me tell that Senator that the name of Taney is to be hooted down the page of history. Judgment is beginning now; and an emancipated country will fasten upon him the stigma which he deserves. The Senator says that he for twenty-five years administered justice. He administered justice at last wickedly, and degraded the judiciary of the country, and degraded the age. Ml. Johnson. I cannot fail to express my astonishment at the course of the honorable Senator from Massachusetts, which he thinks it, I suppose, his duty to pursue. Sir, it the times iu which -we are living are honestly and truly recorded by the historian, I think the honorable member from Massachusetts will be very happy if he stands as pure and as high upon the historic page as the learned judge who is now no more. The honorable member seems to suppose that the decision in the Dred Scott case was a decision of the Chief Justice alone. It was not so. In that decision a majority of the court concurred. Whether that decision is right or not, permit me to say to the honorable member there are men belonging Jto the profession at least his equals, who think it to have been right; but whether right or wrong, those who knew the moral character of the Chief Justice as well as I did, would blush to say that his name is to be execrated among men. Sir, the decisions of that learned Jurist are now quoted with approbation everywhere, and there is not a judge upon the bench now, three or four of them having been selected by the present incum bent of the Presidential ofBce, who will not say at once that a brighter intellect never adorned the judicial station. But it is a matter of history. Every Judge who has been at the head of that tribunal has his bust placed in that court room. Does the honorable member wish to have It unknown in future times that there was * Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 1012-13. SPEECH OP SUMNER. 673 such a Chief Justice? I suppose he does; I presume he does; and why? Because he differed with him. If so, to be consistent,, he will be compelled to wish that two-thirds of the profession in the United States, and two-thirds of tlie country, should be forgotten in all after time, for I am sure I am not mistaken in supposing that at least that number will be found in opposition to the peculiar opinions of the honorable member from Massachusetts. ***** Mr. Sumner. I objected to this Joint resolution some days ago, when it was re ported by the Senator ftom lUinois, [Mr. TR-aMBtrLi,,] aud he was disposed to hurry It at once upon the Senate, to the exclusion of important business. I objected to it again to-day, but it was from no indisposition to discuss it. I know well the trivial apology which may be made for this proposition, and the Senator from Maryland [Mr. Johnson,] has already shown something of the hardi hood with which it may be defended. But in the performance of pubUc duty I am Indifferent to both. " The apology is too obvious. ' Nothing but good of the dead.' This is a familiar saying, which, to a certain extent, may be acknowledged. But it is entirely inap plicable when statues and busts are proposed in honor of the dead. Thpn, at least, truth must prevail. " If a man ha.s done evil during life he must not be complimented in marble. And if indiscreetly it is proposed to decree such a signal honor, then the evil he has done must be exposed ; nor shall any false delicacy seal my lips. It is not enough that he held high place, that he enjoyed worldly honors, or was endowed with inteUectual gifts. ""Who wickedly is wise, or madly brave, Is but the more a fool, the more a knave. " -What is the office of Chief Justice, if it has been used to betray Human Rights ? The crime is great according to the positon of tlie criminal. " If you were asked, sir, to mention the incident of our history previous to the rebellion which was in aU respects most worthy of condemnation, most calculated to cause the blush of shame, and most deadly in its consequences, I do not doubt that you would say the Dred Scott decision, and especially the wicked opinion of the Chief Justice on that occasion. I say this with pain. I do not seek this debate. But when a proposition is made to honor the author of tills wickedness with a commemorative bust at the expense of the country, I am obliged to speak plainly. " I am not aware that the English judges who decided contrary to Liberty in the case of ship-money, and thus sustained the king in those pretensions which ended in civil war, have ever been commemorated in marble. I am not aware that Jef freys, Chief Justice and ChanceUor of England, famous for his talents as for his crimes, has found any niche in Westminster Hall. No, sir. They have been left to the Judgment of history, and there I Insist that Taney shall be left in sympathetic companionship. Each was the tool of unjust power. But the power which Taney served, was none other than that Slave Power which has Involved the country in war. " I speak what cannot be denied when I declare that the opinion of the Chief Justice in the case of Dred Scott, was more thoroughly abominable than anything of the kind in the history of courts. Judicial baseness reached its lowest point on that occasion. You have not forgotten that terrible decision where a most unrighteous judgment was sustained by a falsification of history. * « * " Sir, it is not flt, it is not decent, that such a person should be commemorated by a vote of Congress ; especiaUy at this time when liberty is at last recognized. If you have money to appropriate in this way, let it be in honor of the defenders of liberty now gathered to their fathers. There was John Quincy Adams. There also Tvas Joshua R. Giddings. Let their busts be placed in the court room, ifyou please, where with marble lips they can plead always for human rights, and teach. Judge, and advocate, the glory and the beauty of Justice. Then will you do something not entirely unworthy of a regenerated land ; something which will be an example for future times; something which will help to fix the standard of history. " I know that In the court room there are busts of the other Chief Justices. Very well. So in the haU of the doges, at Venice, there are pictures of all who fllled that 574 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. high office in unbroken succession with the exception of Marino Faliero, who, although as venerable from years as Taney, was deemed unworthy of a place in that line. Where his picture should have been, there was a vacant space which testified always to the Justice of the republic. Let such a vacant space in our court room testify to the Justice of our Republic. Let It speak in warning to aU who would betray liberty. Senator Hale said, " I am not willing to pass an appropri ation, to do honor to the Dred Scott decision, nor to its author." He said: " The Supreme Court of the United States was at that time the thrall of slavery, just as much so as Gurth, the son of Beowulph, and Wamboa, son of Witless, that had a ring about their necks by which they were marked ' born thrall of Cedric, of Rotherwood.' The Supreme Court, the thrall of slavery, did not think it prudent to publish the decision which they made at December term, 1855, and for what rea son? There was a Presidential election coming on in the fall of 1856 ; and If the decision had been made at the sitting of 1855, and the public had known it; if the decision which was afterward proclaimed in 1857, had been declared in 1855, or the eariy part of 1856, the sage of Wheatland would now be an ei-Senator instead of an ex-President. The Supreme Court kept back the decision. Senator Wilson said, " I have no heart to follow any raan to the grave with reproaches, nor to dishonor his name, or defame his memory. But I am impelled by an imperative sense of duty to vote against the resolution to perpetuate in marble, the features of the Judge who pronounced the Dred Scott decision, the greatest crime in the judicial annals of the Republic." He said: " You may, sir, erect statues to him ; yon may pass resolutions, you may pro nounce eulogies ; but the future, the coming future, grand and great, of emanci pated, disenthralled, and regenerated America, will place him just where it wlU places others who were recreant to liberty and humanity. That future will declare that he nurtured the spirit of slavery, strengthened its power, enthroned it, hedged it around with judicial authority, till it, in the pride and arrogance of its power, raised its hand against the Nation, aud rushed headlong into the fire and blood of clvU war." The Senate adjourned without bringing the resolution to a direct vote, and the friends of Chief Justice Taney did not bring the subject again to the attention of the Senate. Justice Taney died October 12th, 1864, and there was great interest felt by the people, and much speculation in the pub lic press, in regard to his successor. The office of Chief Justice, is only second in dignity to that of President, and considering its tenure scarcely, if at all, inferior to the Pres idency in iraportance. Indeed looking to the raoraentous legal and Constitutional questions likely to grow out of the CHASE APPOINTED CHIEF JUSTICE. 575 war, the office of Chief Justice, was the most important in the Government. Those who did not thoroughly know the raagnaniraity, and high sense of duty which governed Mr. Lincoln, could not believe he would nominate Mr. Chase for that position. RecaUing what was termed the want of fidelity to his Chief on the part of Secretary Chase, in permitting his friends to seek his noraination for the Presidency over Mr. Lincoln, while continuing to hold a place in his Cabinet, and the circurastances connected with his resignation of the office of Secretary, they were quite sure Mr. Chase would not be Chief Justice. But this opinion did injustice to Mr. Lincoln. It is known that nothwithstanding all the infiuence brought in favor of others for this high position, Mr. Lincoln never hesitated a raoment in his determination to appoint Mr. Chase. He believed him the most fit man for the station, and he said: "We have stood together in the time of trial, and I should despise rayself if I allowed personal differences, to affect my judgment of his fitness for the office of Chief Justice." The appointment of Salmon P. Chase as Chief Justice of the United States was promptly sent to the Senate^ on the meeting of Congress, and as promptly confirmed. Nothing perhaps more strikingly illustrates the revolution in opinion, and in the Government, than this change in the Supreme Court. Taney was the representative of slavery; Chase had long been the champion of liberty. Taney's dy nasty on the bench will ever mark the period of the supreme rule of slavery in the Republic, as that of Chase; the advent of universal freedom. The author of the Dred Scott decision gave place to the author of the great argument for freedom in the Van Zant case. In that case, Mr Chase said to the then Chief Justice, " Execrandus qui non favet libertaii." " He who will not favor liberty, shall be accursed." A maxim, of which there has been no more striking illustration than that furnished by the posthumous farae of Chief Justice Taney. The gravity of the usuaUy sober proceedings of the House, was reUeved by an amusing episode, occurring between Cox of Ohio, and Washburne ofllUnois, during the discussion of the Freedmen's Bureau bill. Mr. Cox made a curious and sarcastic speech upon what he called "miscegenation," charging 576 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the Republican party with being in favor of' the amalgama tion of the black and white races; and'in this speech he was especially severe and contemptuous upon the negro. Wash burn immediately foUowed him, and for the purpose of show ing the inconsistency of the member frora Ohio, read the foUowing extracts, corapliraentary to the negro frora a Uvely and clever book written by Mr. Cox, and entitled " The Buckeye Abroad." * " We shall not probably have the pleasure at next Congress of hearing my friend from Ohio rehearse this speeeh here, because I think, in the Ught of the recent elections in Ohio, and particularly In the district of the honorable gentlemen, I can say to him In the language of Watts, and in the spirit of the utmost kindness, ' You living man, come view the ground Where you must shortly lie.' " I desire to show the House what the gentleman from Ohio has written iu regard to the 'African,' in a book entitled 'A Buckeye Abroad; or Wanderings in Europe and in the Orient.' By S. S. Cox. He is describing St. Peter's, and says : ' In the mean time seraphic musio from the Pope's select choir ravishes the ear, while the incense titUlates the nose. Soon there arises in the chamber of theatrical glitter'— "What?— ' a plain unquestioned African ! [laughter,] and he utters the sermon in facile La- tinity, with graceful manlier. His dark hands gestured harmoniously with the rotund periods, and his swart visage beamed with a, high order of intelligence.' [Laughter.] What was he ? Let the gentleman from Ohio answer : ' He was an Abyssinian. What a commentary was here upon our American prejudices! The head of the great Catholic Church surrounded by the ripest scholars of the age, listening to the eloquence' — of whom ? — * of the despised negro ; and thereby illus trating to the world"— what 7— ' thereby illustrating to the world the common bond of brotherheod which binds the human race.' [Roars of laughter.] " But the gentleman goes on to say : ' I confess that, at first, it seemed to me a sort of theatrical mummery, not being familiar with such admixtures of society.' That was the first impression of my young and festive friend from Ohio as he wan dered through the gilded corriders of St. Peter's. (Laughter.] ' But,' lie says, ' on refiec tion, I discerned in it the same infiuence' which, during the dark ages, conferred such inestimable blessings on mankind. History records that from the time of the re-yival of lettera, the influence of the Church of Rome had been generally favor able to science, to civilization, and to good government. Why?' Why, asks my friend from Ohio, is the Church of Bome so favorable to science, to civilization, and to good government? Let the gentleman answer: ' Because her system held then, as it holds now, all distinctions of caste as odious.' [Great laughter.] 'She regards no man, bond or free, white or black, as disqualified for the priesthood. This doctrine has, as Macauley develops in his introductory chapters to his English history, mitigated many of the worst evils of society; for where race tyrannized over race, or baron over villein, Catholicism came between them and created an aristocracy altogether Independent of race or feudalism, compelling even the here ditary master to kneel before the spiritual tribunal of the hereditary bondman The childhood of Europe was passed under the guardianship of priestly teachers ; who taught, as the scene in the Sistlne chaper of an Ethiop addressing the proud rulers of Catholic Christendom teaches, .that no distinction is regarded at Rome, save that which divides the priest from the people. " ' The sermon of the Abyssinian '—that is, of this colored person, this Roman citizen of ' African descent '— ' in beautiful print was distributed at the door. I * See Congressional Globe, First Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 713. WASHBURNE AND COX. 577 bring one home as a trophy and a souvenir of a great truth which Americans are prone to deny or contemn.' [Laughter.] " Now, I ask my friend from Ohio if he has still got that trophy and souvenir to bring into this Hall ? " Mr. Cox. If the gentleman will allow me to reply I will do so. " Mr. Washbubnk, of Illinois. 1 believe I have never in my life refused to yield to my friend from Ohio, but he refused to yield to me when he had the fioor Just now, and as, of course, I always Uke to be equal with him In politeness, I must decline to yield now." Mr. Lincoln had strong hopes, that the constitutional araendraent aboUshing and prohibiting slavery throughout the Republic, might now, at the 2d session of the 38th Con gress be passed, notwithstanding it had failed at the previous session. Hence, as we have seen, he earnestly in his mes sage urged the measure upon Congress. The fact that the people had by such a decided majority declared in favor of this raeasure, strengthened the hope that it might now obtain the requisite constitutional raajority of two-thirds. It will be reraerabered that the resolution had passed the Sen ate, with only six negative votes, and that a motion to recon sider was pending in the House^ when the first sessson of this Congress adjourned. On the 6th of January 1865, Mr. Ashley, of Ohio, who had entered the motion to reconsider, called it up and made an able speech in its favor.* Mr. Orth, of Indiana, spoke earnestly in favor of the res olution. Messrs. Townsend of New Tork, Holman, Cra vens and Voorhees of Indiana, spoke against it. Mr. Voorhees said : f " Such an act shotild not be consummated amid the fiery passions and vehement hates engendered by civil war It should be the work of calmness and of peace. It is to last for all time. There is an idea of perpetuity attached to constitutions and constitutional amendments which does not belong to ordinary acts of Legislation. They should therefore be the work of unclouded wisdom, and not spring from the wrath and smoke of the battle-field. If we have spent a large portion of our time here since the war commenced in repealing or revising or amending our hasty and crude legislation, it should admonish us to refrain €rom laying a rude and Inno vating hand on the Constitution Itself. When the sky shall again be clear over our heads, a peaceful sun illuminating the land, and our great household of States all at home in harmony once more, then will be the time to coulsder what changes, If any, this generation desires to make on the work of Washington, Madison, and the revered sages of our antiquity." Mr. Kasson of Iowa, spoke very ably in favor ofthe amend ment. After replying to the arguments of Mr. Mallory and * Congressional Globe, Second Session Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 141. t Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, page 138. 37 578 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. other members of the Kentucky delegation against the res olution. He said:* " I appeal from that old Kentucky to that young giant Kentucky that is now ris ing in its place and representing the purer democracy of our fathers. That young giant springing like Minerva full" armed from the front of Jove, which took action in Its Legislature on Friday last in the spirit of this amendment, and which has an eloquent exponent upon this fioor, [Mr. Yeaman,] from whom we have heard once on this question. I appeal to that young Kentucky, infused with the life of the tunes, capable oS' appreciating the spirit of events, competent to understand the necessity of a modification of our institutions which is required by the times, and by circumstances. And to that Kentucky I submit the argument which I render here, for it will meet me on tlie terms and premises, and logic which I have sought humbly to submit to gentlemen on that side of thp House to-day. * * * " One of its effects as stated to me yesterday on competent authority was that one of the ' institutions' subordinate to the institution of slavery had been called into play against some soldiers of our Army who had been taken prisoners and es caped. It is well known that it is a recognized business in parts of the South to keep and train blood-hounds for the recovery of fugitive slaves. I speak of it as a fact well known and not denied by anybody. My information is this, that four union soldiers recently escaped from one of the rebel camps were pursued by the aid of that subordinate institution and overtaken. A ring was formed about them and the blood-hounds were let in on these four soldiers, who were torn to pieces amid the jeers and shouts of the rabble which encircled them ! Tell me that it IS my duty to act in any way for the protection of that Institution ! Let gentlemen go home to their constituents if they will, and say that they voted for the perpetu ation of an institution capable of effects of that kind, one which denies the consti- tutioual rights of our citizens in the South, suppresses the freedom of speech and of the press, throws types into the rivers when they do not print its will, and vio lates more clauses of the Constitution than were violated even by the rebels when they commenced this war, and which.has, in effect, been in chronic and constant rebellion against the provisions of our natiohal Constitution for the last twenty years. *********** * " I had rather stand solitary, with my name recorded for this amendment, with the hope of justice twenty years hence, than to have all the honors which could be heaped upon me by any political party in opposition to this doctrine. You cannot resist the tide of modern civilization. It commenced with our Revolution, and it will fiow on until unforseen obstacles shall block up its course. It was sustained by the spirit of Washington, and Madison aud Jefferson, who denounced this in stitution ; it was strengthened by Prance, when that great empire then flourished with the liberal genius of a republic, pronounced a decree for the entire abolition of slavery throughout her then extended colonial dominions. Thence it passed to England, and, although a bitter enemy of Prance, and disliking everything fa vored by the French people, yet after twenty years ot contest under the leader ship ot men whose names stand high— none higher— on the roll of English history or of fame, freedom became a fixed fact throughout all the dominions of Great Britain. Subsequently it even permeated the arbitrary despotism of Russia, and now. by a decree of the imperial Government, seven million serfs are set free and restored to the natural rights of mankind." Fernando Wood of New York, opposed the resolution, as did many others who .sympathized with him politicaUy. Mr. Farnsworth of Illinois, an early radical abolitionist, one of the band of men which had under the lead of Love joy, built up the Liberty party in IlUnois andthe north-west, ¦« Congressional Globe, 2d session, 38th Congress, page 198. DEBATE ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. 579 spoke strongly in favor of the araendraent. Perhaps the ablest speech against the resolution was raade by Mr. Pen dleton, the leader of the Deraocratic party in the House, and late its candidate for the Vice Presidency. He denied the constitutional power of Congress to pass the amendment. After ingeniously arguing the constitutional question he closed with the foUowing eulogy upon the Constitution " as it is." * " This Constitution demands the highest admiration of my intellect. It has re ceived the profound homage of my heart. The oath which I have taken commands me to perform that duty which my intellect and my heart impose upon me ; and I intend, through evU and through good report, through whatever storm of popular disfavor, to stand by it as I understand it, even to the end. I love my whole country. South as well as North ; and it is because I love it that no act of mine shall retard the restoration of peace or the reconstruction of that Union which made it all my country. I am a Northern man ; I have their prejudices; I love my section; I love its people; I love its institutions ; I am jealous of Its honor; and no act of mine shaU stain the lustre of the fame of its good faith. I am a citizen of Ohio. It was the home of my fathers, and it is the home of my children ; and I will stand by this Constitution because I wish to preserve forever the rights and dignities of my State, and maintain forever the liberties of its citizens. " I am not influenced, therefore, by any peculiar love for the people of the South; by any peculiar regard for their institutions. I stand unmoved by the con siderations which have been addressed to us. It is nothing to me that gentlemen from slaveholding States approve this amendment ; .it is nothing to me that the tide of the popular sentiment runs in favor of it ; it is nothing to me that we of Northern States who believe as I do, stand alone, if alone we must stand. I in tend to do my duty as I understand It, and I am prepared for the consequences be they what they may." Mr. Jenkes of Rhode Island said : "But in this contest slavery commenced the flght ; it [chose its own battle-fleld; It has fought its battle, and it is dead. In the course of our victorious march, that battle-fleld has come into our possession , and the corpse of our dead enemy is up on it. Let us bury it quickly, and with as little ceremony as possible, that the foul odor of its rotting carcass may no longer offend us and the world." Mr. Woodbridge of Vermont, denying property in raan said: t " Coming from the Green Mountain State, where the mountain brooks leap from rock to rock, In the full play of freedom ; where the winds of heaven sing the song of freedom among the trees upon her mountain tops, and where a good old judge, fifty years ago, said to a claimant who claimed and presented a bill of sale for a slave, " Show me a bill of sale from God Almighty, and your title will be recognized,' it is not necessary for me to say that in my Judgment there can be no property in man." " It will end iu the triumph of the Union ; it will end iu the honor of the glori ous old flag, so thatit shall float again over every inch of the soil of the Union ; but not alone because of Lincoln, not alone because ot Farragut, not because of Sherman, not because of Grant, but because of God. Slavery has been tried at the * Congressional Globe, 2d Sess. 38 Congress, p. 224-5. ¦f Congressional Globe, 2d session S8th Congress, p. 243-4. 580 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. bar of Omnipotence and been found wanting. Its history is not written In the history of the nineteenth century. When we eome to the great and ;final victory it wUl not be a victory alone, sir, but It will be a change of front of the universe. Sir, It wlU open to the oppressed people of Europe renewed hope of freedom for themselves and their children. " The a,doptlon of this amendment will be beneficial to the South. Sir, I know that this war will end ; and I entreat gentlemen upon the other side of the House to act with us in putting down, by constitutional means, the cause of this great and dlrefnl calamity. The war will end victoriously for us ; but I want this resolution to pass, and then, when it does end, the beautiful statue of the goddess of Liberty which BOW crowns the majestic dome above our heads may look north and south east and west, upon a free nation, untarnished by ought inconsistent with free dom-redeemed, regenerated, and disenthralled by the genius of universal emancipation." Mr. Thayer, representing faithfuUy the State of Pennsyl vania, appropriately called the Keystone State, in reply to Pendleton and his eloquent expression of attachraent to his native State, and his oraission to express his higher allegi ance to the Republic said : * " Sir, I reverence the gentleman's affection and allegiance to his native Stata ; I entertain the highest respect toward him for cherishing those feelings. But, sir, I would have been glad to have seen his great talents directed to maintain not only the glory of his native State, but also the sovereignty and perpetuity of this great brotherhood of States, the glory of this great American nation, now receiving its baptism of blood and fire. I should have preferred, sir, in a great crisis like the present, to Usten not to such partisan and sectional cries as ' Long live Ohio !' or ' Long live Massachusetts !' or ' Long live Pennsylvania !' but to that nobler, better shout which now bursts like the roar of the ocean from hundreds of thousands of brave men, as they hurl themselves upon the common enemy of the Americau people. ' Long live the nation !' Long Uve the United States of America^one and inseparable !' " One of the ablest and raost eloquent speeches in favor of the araendraent was raade by Mr. Rollins of Missouri. He said " The rebeUion instigated and carried on by slavehold ers, has been the death-kneU of the institution./ * He said •'I am a believer in the Declaration of Independence wherein it is asserted that ' all men are created equal.' I believe that when it says ' all men' it means every man who was created in the 'image of his Maker' and walks on God's foot-stool, without regard to race, color, or any other accidental circumstance by which he may be surrounded. I know that astute politicians, crafty and ambitions men, in various periods of the republic have tried to draw a distinction between this nian aud that man, because he happened to have a different colored skin ; that the Dec laration was applicable alone to white men, and not to the black mau the red man, or any other than the white man. That the word ' all' meant a part, not 'all! But, sir, I believe that that general clause in the Declaration oflnde pendence was meant by the immortal man who penned it, and the immortal men who signed it,, and by a large majority of the great men of that day North and South, to assert the great principle, founded in the rights of mau, founded in rea^ son and in strict accordance to the law of morality aud of the Divine will that ' aU menare created equal,' without distinction of race or of color. And although our * Congressional Globe 2d Session, 38th Congress, page 246. "Congressional Globe, 2d session, 38th Congress, page 258-260. DEBATE ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. 581 ancestors felled to apply the principle, although they were derelict in duty in liv ing up to the great enunciation of principles which they made to the world and mankind, it is uo proof to my mind that they did not mean exactly what I say they meant in the expression to which I have referred. *' '* * * " An anti-slavery man in sentiment, and yet, heretofore a large owner of slaves myself— not now, however— not exactly with my consent, but with or without my consent. The convention which recently assembled in my State, 1 learned from a telegram a morning or two ago, had adopted an amendment to our present State constitution for the immediate emancipation of all the slaves in the State,. I am no longer the owner of a slave, and I thank God for it. If the giving up of my slaves without complaint shall be a contribution upon my part to promote the pub lic good, to uphold the Constitution of the United States, to restore peace and pre serve this Union, if I had owned a thousand slaves, they would most cheerfiUly have been given up. I say with all my.heart, let them go, but let them not go without a sense of feeling and a proper regard on my part for the '.future of themselves and their offspring !" Of the power of the slaveholders in ruling the Republic, he used the following language : " Sir, the pecuUar friends of slavery have controlled the government for much the greater part of the time since its establishment ; and but for their own wick edness and folly might have saved the institution, and h.id their fuU share in Its managementfor many years to come. If they have lost the political control, aU are blameless save themselves ! ' But yesterday, the word of Csesar might Have stood against the world ; now lies he there, With none so poor as to do him reverence.' Of the necessity to abolish slavery, to secure permanent peace, he said : * " We never can have an entire peace in this country as long as the institution of slavery remains as one of the recognized institutions of the country. It occurs to me that tlie surest way to obtain peace is to dispose ofthe institution now. From whatever cause, whether it be from Northem Intermeddling— if you so call it ; and there has been far too much of this — or from Southern arrogance and dictation and agitation, whether from one cause or the other, or both, slavery wil) always be a disturbing element ! There will be no peace, there will be no perfect Union in this country until some way or other we shall have disposed of It. You cannot get over moral convictions. And so long as the General Goverpment is connected with slavery or associated with it in any way, the great tide of emigration that will flow into the South, carrying new ideas of human rights, this institution will be a disturbing element, and we will have a continued agitation until, in some way or other, this question is disposed of. I have therefore brought myself up to the'point We may as weU unsheath the sword and cut the Gordian knot I" Of Mr. Lincoln's proposition for compensated eraancipa tion, he said : "And, sir, if ever a set of people made a mistake ou earth. It was the menol Kentucky, by whom I was somewhat governed myself when three years ago they rejected the offer of the President of the United States, who, wiser than we were, seeing the difiioulties before us, but seeing the bow of promise set in the sky, and knowing what was to come, proposed to us to sweep the institution of slavery from • Congressional Globe 2d session, 38th Congress, page 260-1. 582 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the border States, offering the assistance of the United States to aid in compen sating the loyal men of those States for their losses in labor ahd property. I say that the unwisest of all acts, so far as the border States were concerned, was the rejection of this liberal offer on the part of the Executive of the United States. I voted for the proposition at first ; and then most unwisely changed my ground, showing the versatility ofthe man, and would perhaps, if it had come to a final vote, have opposed it, because my constituents were likely to be offended by the passage of such a law. They arc now convinced, when their slaves are gone aud their pockets are empty, tliat I was right in the flrst place, and they were wrong. 1 have read in the papers of this morning that the Legislature of Kentucky, after electing that distinguished and able man, James Guthrie, to the Senate of the United States, have passed a resolution in favor of the emancipation, ' urtlh the consent qf the owners, and with compensation." Of the first introduction of slavery into the country he said: " Mr. Speaker, I regret that the action of our ancestors in reference to slavery in flicted this evil upon us. And when I speak of our .ancestors, I mean those of Plymoth rock and those of James river. And while iu this house and in the other end ol this Capitol, I have heard attacks on the pilgrim fathers, and while I saw lately, a disreputable statement concerning the early settlers of Virginia, yet I have no sympathy with the spirit which prompts such efforts. Doubtless there were bad men as well as honest and good men among the original settlers of both the northern and the southern sections of our country. Through the promptings of cupidity and avarice, slave'ry was first established in this countrj-. Could our ancestors who countenanced this Institution in its establishment, witness the scenes of the present time, they would doubtless feel that they committed an un pardonable sin. And for this sin the North and the South are equally responsible The people of both sections were engaged in this infamous trafiie, and we are this day gathering the fruits of their iniquity. It is thus that ' Even handed Justice Commends the ingredients of our poisoned chaUce To our own lips;' or, as the same great master expresses It — ' That we but teach Bloody instructions which, being taught, retum To plague the inventor." ' Speaking of Kentucky he said : " I again, Mr. Speaker, refer to the State of Kentucky, she was admitted In to the Union iu 1799. She is the oldest daughter in the family of States. She was the first that was .admitted after the adoption of the Federal Constitution. The great men of Kentucky of that day, proud and venerable names, advocated the propriety of a system of gradual emancipation. Will my friend from the Maysville district, [Mr, Wadsworth,] will my friend from the Louisville district [Mr. Mal- IjOby,] will any of my friends who oppose this amendment declare that it would not have been a great boon if the original constitution of Kentucky had disposed of slavery forever 1 Will my very excellent friend [Mr. Clay] say that it would not have been better for his distinguished and venerable fatiier, who was a member of the convention wliich framed the first Constitution of Kentucky would it not have been better for his immediate ancestors, to have met firmly the ques tion at that day, and thus relieved the State from slavery, and the people of tliat noble Commonwealth of the terrible sorrows which have since fallen upon them ?' Of the eficcts of slavery upon Missouri, he eloquently said . " I come now to speak a word in reference to my own State of Missouri. She came into the Union as it were in the midst of a revolution. For tlie purpose only DEBATE ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. 583 of having a few thousand slaves there, the whole continent shook with the agita tion of this Missouri question. We were fighting for the privilege of holding a few slaves in bondage In that great State. We forgot the paramount good in this mis erable struggle. Does my friend [Mr. Hall,] from the district adjoining the one which I represent, does any man upon this floor tell me that it would not have been better for Missouri at once, in 1820 to have passed an ordinance for the grad ual or immediate emancipation of her slaves, driving the institution beyond her boundaries ? If there is such a man he is not as enlightened on the subject to-day as I am : he has not learned as much as I have done. " Why, sir, what is Missouri to-day, and what would she have been had there been incorporated at that time with her organic law, an ordinance' declaring the Institution of slavery forever abolished within her limits ? We would have been as Ohio, and Illinois and Iowa. We would have been rid of this curse which is ever reappearing, the curse of Slavery, the raw head and bloody bones, and we would have been clear of all these troubles. We would have had no bands of guerrillas watering the soil of our State with the blood of our peaceful citizens. We would have had no armed bodies of men stationed in all our borders to keep the peace. Look at Illinois, Just across the Fatiier of Waters. She came into the Union in 1818, two years befdre Missouri, and with less population, fewer mineral resources, not so manj^ rivers, no better facilities for commerce, yet she has four thousand miles of railroad, while Missouri has only twelve hundred. Illinois has a prosper ous, happy and peaceful population of two million, while we have only half thl^ number, and our people are leaving in every direction, seeking homes in the terri tories, in the distant mountains, in South America, in Mexico, iu Illinois, flying away from the horrble spectre of this infernal rebellion. Why is this ? I know of but one real, substantial, specific reason, aud that is that the framers of the Mis souri constitution allowed slavery to remain, while Illinois was made forever free by the ordinance of 17S7, penned by Thomas Jefferson, a son of Virginia, and by which Virginia ceded an empire within itself (the Northwestern Territory) to the United States. ' " I have been looking up for light from above, aud I begin to see it streaking along the horizon, however it may be with other gentlemen in tills hall." He then indulged in the following predictions of the future: "When the poor and humble farmers and mechanics of the. States of Alabama and Mississippi shall have left the bloody trials in which they are now engaged to tear down this temple of human liberty ; when they will return perhaps to their deso lated homes ; when they shaU look once more upon and hug to their bosoms the wives and children whom they love, in poverty and in rags ; when they will go, .perhaps without an arm, or without an eye, or without a leg, and in poverty to those who are dependent upon them for support in life, taught by experience, they will ask the question of themselves, ' -Why all this ? What have we been flghting for ?' Thev will bring to mind the sweet memories of otiier days. They will re member the peaceful and happy home which they were induced to leave, and which they enjoyed under the benign influences of wholesome and liberal laws passed here, and they wiU inquire ' By what sophistry, by what appeal, by what force, by what maddening influence is it that we have been Induced to enter into this terrible rebellion ? Not to promote any Interest of wife and children, but to destroy all the blessings vouchsafed to us and to them by a free government and equitable laws ;' and they will further ask, ' Who has been the author of my mis- fprtunes, and the ruin of my family, my all?' Sir, they will point to those who hold the power at Richmond ; they will direct their vengeance against them ; and Davis and his traitorous crew, as I have said upon a former occasion, .will, like AetsBon of old, be tn the end destroyed by their own friends." He concluded by saying ; " Let ours be the ' bright particular star' next to the star that led the shepherds to Bethlehem, which shall lead the downtrodden and oppressed of all the world into 684 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. an harbor of peace, security and happiness. And let us, kneeling around the altar, all thank God, that although we have had our trials, we have saved our country ; that although we have been guilty of sins, we have wiped them out, and that we at length stand up a great and powerful people, honored by all the earth, ' redeemed, regenerated, and disenthralled by the genius of universal emancipation.' [Loud applause on the floor and In the galleries, which was checked by. the Speaker.] The foregoing speech made by a raan who had been a large slaveholder, held the House and the crowded galleries in the most profound attention. Few more effective speech es have ever been made in the Halls of Congress. Mr. Garfield of Ohio, traced in a graphic manner the his tory of the slave power — its former arrogance, and its present prostration : * "¦Whodoesnotrememberthat thirty years ago, a short period in the life of a nation, but little could be said with impunity in these Halls on the subject of slav ery ? How well do gentlemen here remember the history of that distinguished pre decessor of mine, Joshua R. Giddings, lately gone to his rest, who, with his forlorn hope of faithful men took his life in his hands, and in the name of justice protested against the great crime, and who stood bravely in his place until his white locks, Uke the plume of Henry of Navarre, marked where the battle of freedom raged fiercest. We can hardly realize that this is the same people, and these the same Halls, where now scarcely a man can be found who wi^ venture to do more than felter out an apology for slavery, protesting at the same time that he has no love for the dying tyrant. None, I believe, but that man of more than supernal bold ness from the city of New York, [Mr. Fernando Wood] has ventured this session to raise his voice in favor of slavery for its own sake. He still sees in its features the reflection of divinity and beauty, and only he. ' How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning ! How art thou cut down to the ground, whichdldst weaken the nations!' Many mighty men have been slain by thee; many proud ones have humbled themselves at thy feet ! AU along the coast of the political sea they lie like stranded wrecks, broken on the headlands of free dom. How lately did its advocates with impious boldness maintain it as God's cwn, to be venerated and cherished as divine. It was another and higher form of civilization. It was the holy evangel of America, dispensing its blessings to the wilderness of the west. In Its mad arrogance It lifted its hand to strike down the fabric of the Union, and since that fatal day it has been a ' fugitive and a vaga bond upon the earth ;' and like the spirit that Jesus cast out,, it has since then been ' seeking rest and finding none.' It has sought in aU the corners of the Re public to flnd some hiding place in which to shelter itself from the death it has so richly earned. It sought an asylum in the untrodden territories in the West, but with a whip of scorpians, indignant freedom drove it hence. I do not believe u loyal man can now be found that would consent that it should again enter them. It has no hopes of harbor there. It found no protection or favor in the hearts or consciences of the freemen of the Republic, and has fied from its last hope of safe ty to the shield of the Constitution. We propose to follow it there and hurl it as Satan was exiled from heaven.' And now, after these long discussions, rose the still tall and scarcely bent forra of the venerable leader of the House, Thaddeus Stevens, to close the debate on this great * Congressional Globe 2d session, 38th Congress, page 263. STEVENS' SPEECH. 585 measure. Instantly the raembers of the House gathered around him, filling the seats and aisles, and every available spot near the " old man eloquent." Intelligence was sent to the Senate that Thad. Stevens was speaking on the Consti tutional Amendment, and directly many of the Senators came in, and Justices of the Supreme Court, to hear the ven erable anti-slavery leader speak on the measure that was to consummate the labors of forty years with coraplete success. As soon as Senators and raerabers could get their places, the House and crowded galleries were hushed info deepest silence. He said: * f " * «¦ * ¦" From my earliest youth I was taught to read the Declaration of Independence and to revere its sublime principles. As I advancecjL in life and be came somewhat enabled to consult the writings of the great men of antiquity, I found In aU their works which have survived the ravages of time, and come down to the present generation, one unanimous denunciation of tyranny and of Slavery, and eulogy of Uberty. Homer, ^schylus the great Greek tragedian, Cicero, Hesiod, Virgil, Tacitus, and Sallust, in Immortal language, all denounced slavery as a thing which took away half the man, and degraded human beings, and sang peans in the noblest strains to the goddess of liberty. And my hatred of this infernal Institution and my love for liberty were further infiamed, as I saw the inspired teachings of Socrates and the divine inspirations of Jesus. " Being fixed in these principles, immovably and immutably, I took my stand among my fellow-citizens, and on all occasions, whether in public or in private, in season, and, if there could be such a time, out of season, I never hesitated to express those ideas and sentiments, and when 1 went first into public assemblies, forty years ago, I uttered this language. I have done it amid the pelting aud hooting of mobs, but I never quailed before the Infernal spirit, and I hope I never shrank from the responsibiUty of my language. ****** * * « **** " -When, fifteen years ago, I was honored with a seat In this body, it was danger ous to talk against this institution, a danger ¦vvhich gentlemen now here will never be able to appreciate. Some of us, however, have experienced it ; my friend from Illinois on my right [Mr. Washburne] has. And yet, sir, I did not hesitate, in the midst of bowie-knives and revolvers, and howling demons upon the other side of the House, to stand here and denounce this infamous institution in language which possibly now, on looking at it, I might deem intemperate, but which I then deemed necessary to rouse the public attention and cast odium upon the worst institu tion upon earth, one which is a disgrace to man and would be an annoyance to the Infernal spirits. ***** * * ****** " Perhaps I ought not to occupy so much time, aud I will only say one word further. So far as the appeals of the learned gentleman [Mr. Pendleton] are con cerned, his pathetic winding up, I will be willing to take my chance, when we all molder in. the dust. He may have his epitaph written, if it be truly written, 'Here rests the ablest and most pertinacious defender of slavery and opponent of lib erty ;' and 1 will be satisfied if my epitaph shall be written thus: 'Here lies one who never rose to any eminence, and who only courted the low ambjtioii to have it said that he had striven to ameliorate the condition ofthe poor, the lowly, the downtrodden of every race and language and color. [Applause.] " I shall be content with such a eulogy on his lofty tomb, and such an InscriptloD on my humble grave, to trust our memories to the judgment of other ages." * Congressional Globe, 2d session, 38th Congress, page 265-6. 586 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. The spectacle presented during the delivery of the above speech was deeply impressive. The Diplomatic circle was crowded, the House was filled, the galleries were packed with distinguished citizens frora every section, the fioor and lobbies of the HaU itself, were filled with distinguished sol diers and civilians who gathered to hear the debate, and who now listened to the Pennsylvania statesman, as he narrated the progress of the anti-slavery cause from its feeble begin ning, down to its now near approaching and final triumph. As the vote was taken on the final passage of the Joint Reso lution, the most intense anxiety was felt in regard to the re sult. No one knew with certainty what would be that result. Whether a suflicient number of Democratic votes could be obtained to secure its passage was uncertain. As the clerk called the roll, there was perfect silence ; no sound except that made by a hundred pencils quickly marking the ayes and noes as the members responded. When the call was finished it was found there were 119 ayes, and 56 nays : two- thirds of the members having voted for the resolution it was adopted.* * The following is a list of the ayes and noes, on the passage of the Resolution, taken from the Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 531. YEAS— Messrs. Alley, Allison, Ames, Anderson, Arnold, Ashley. Bailey, Augus tus G. Baldwin, John D. Baldwin, Baxter, Beaman, Blane, Blair, Blow, Boutwell, Boyd, Brandegee, Broomal, William G. Brown, Ambrose W. Clark, Freeman Clarlie, Cobb, Goffrotli, Cole, Colfax, Creswell, Henry Winter Davis, Thomas T. Davis, Dawes, Deming, Dixon, Donnelly, Driggs, Dumont, Eckley, Eliot, English, Farnsworth, Frank, Ganson, Garfield, Goocii, Grinnell, Griswold, Hale, Herrick, Higby, Hooper, Hotchkiss, Asahel W. Hubbard, John H. Hubbard, Hnlburd, Hutcliins, Ingersoll, Jenckes, Julian, Kasson, Kelley, Francis W. Kellogg, Orlando ' Kellogg, King, Knox, Littlejohn, Loan, Lougyear, Marvin, McAllister, McBride, McClung, Mclndoe, Samuel F. Miller, Moortiead, Morrill, Daniel Morris, Amos Myers, Leonard Myers, Nelson, Norton, Odell, Charles O'Neill, Orth, Patterson, Perham, Pike, Pomeroy, Price, Radford, William H. Randall, Alexander H. Bice, John H. Rice, Edward H. Rollins, James S. Rollins, Schenck, Scofield, Shannon, Sloan, Smith, Smithers, Spalding, Starr, John B. Steele, Stevens, Thayer, Thomas, Tracy, Upson, Van Valkenburgh, Elihu B. Washburne, William B. Washburne, Webster, Whaley, Wheeler, Williams, Wilder, Wilson, Windom, Woodbridge, Worthington, and Yeaman — 119. NAYS— Messrs. James C. Allen, WlUiam'J. Allen, Ancona, Bliss, Brooks, James S. Brown, Chanler, Clay, Cox, Cravens, Dawson, Denison, Eden, Edgerton, Eldridge, Finck, Grider, Hall, Harding, Harrington, Benjamin G. Harris, Charles M. Harris, Holman, Philip Johnson, William Johnson, Kalbfieisch, Kernan, Knapp, Law, Long, Mallory, WUliam H. Miller, James R. Morris, Morrison, Noble, John O'Neill, Pendleton, Perry, Pruyn, Samuel J. Randall, Robinson, Boss, Scott, William Q. Stee.e, Stiles, Strouse, Stuart, Sweat, Townsend, ;Wadsworth, Ward, Chilton A. White, Joseph W. White, Winfield, Benjamin Wood, and Fernando Wood— 56. NOT VOTING!— Messrs. Lazear, Le Blond, Marcy, McDowell, McKlnney, Middleton, Rogers, and Voorhees— 8, PASSAGE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. 587 When the name of English, a democrat frora Connecticut was called and he answered aye, there was great applause in the House and galleries ; so it was when Ganson, Herrick, Nelson, Odell, Radford, and Steele, democrats from New York, were called and they voted aye. When the Speaker made the formal annunciation, "The Constitutional majority of two-thirds having voted in the affirmative, the joint resolution is passed, " it was received with an uncontrollable outburst of enthusiasra. The Repub lican raembers, regardless of the rules, instantly sprang to their feet, and applauded with cheers ; the example was fol lowed by the spectators in the galleries, who waved their hats, and the ladies their handkerchiefs, and cheers and con gratulations continued for many minutes. FinaUy Mr. Inger- sall of Illinois, representing the district of Owen Lovejoy, in honor as he said of the sublime event, moved that the House adjourn. The motion was carried, but before the members left their seats the roar of artiUery announced to the people of Washington, that the araendraent had passed Congress. The personal friends of Mr. Lincoln, hastening to the White House, exchanged congratulations with him on the auspicious result. The passage of the resolution was not unexpected to him, and it filled his heart with joy. He saw in it the complete consuraraation of his own great work, the Eraancipation Proclamation. As the leader in the overthrow of slavery, he had seen his proclamation sanc tioned by an emphatic majority of the people at the Presi dential election, and now the Constitutional majority of two- thirds in both Houses of Congress had voted to subrait to the people the Constitutional amendment, which would finish the "job," In the evening, a vast crowd of enthusiastic and rejoicing friends, marched with music to the White House, publicly to congratulate the President on the passage of the resolu tion. Mr, Lincoln addressing the crowd said: " The occa sion is one for congratulation to the country and the whole world." He informed them that Illinois had already ratified the amendment, and that it had already been ratified by one 588 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. branch of the Maryland Legislature ; but he was proud that Illinois had been the State first to act. The joint resolution was inadvertently presented to the President, and signed by him. But he suggested that the action of Congress was perfect of itself, and did not need the the signature of the Executive to render it valid. Judge TrumbuU presented a resolution, reciting that the amend ment proposed by Congress respecting the extinction of slavery, having been inadvertently presented to the Presi dent for his approval, it was declared that such approval was unnecessary to give effect to the action of Congress; was inconsistent with the former practice in reference to all araendraents to the Constitution heretofore adopted, and be ing inadvertently done should not constitute a precedent for the future.* Senator Trumbull in his speech on the subject reviewed all the precedents, and showed that no araendraent of the Constitution ever adopted by the people, had ever been pre sented to the President for his approval; and that the point having been raade before the Suprerae Court, that without such approval the araendraent was invalid, the Supreme Court had held such approval unnecessary ; the Chief Justice declaring the opinion of the court, saying: "The negative of the President applies only to the ordinary cases of legis lation. He has nothing to do with the proposition or adop tion of araendraents to the Constitution." The Senate adopted the resolution of Senator TrurabuU without a divi sion. f The question may therefore be considered as settled by the precedents and the concurrence of all Departraents of the Government. The friends of universal liberty throughout the Republic, regarded the passage of the joint resolution through Con gress, as equivalent to the adoption of the amendment. The people having sanctioned it at the Presidential election, and two-thirds of both branches of Congress having voted for it, it was not doubted three-fourths of the States, through their Legislatures, would ratify it. The passage of the * Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 629. t Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 63L PASSAGE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. 589 resolution through Congress was therefore celebrated as the triuraph of freedora, and the final " overthrow of slavery " throughout the Republic. The question was discussed whether the adoption of the araendraent by three-fourths of the States represented in Congress, and who, while the other States were public eneraies, constituted the United States, would be a compliance with the Constitution. It was decided by the House of Representatives, that a Constitutional quo- ram of the House, was a majority of the members duly elected to the House. It was contended that a majority of three-fourths of the United States, meant three-fourths of the States recognized as States ofthe Union; those whose Repre sentatives and Senators constituted Congress and the law making power. That States whose people were public enemies and who were in open war seeking to overthrow the Constitu tion, could not, while occupying such an attitude, be entitled to vote on an amendment to the Constitution, which they were seeking to destroy. As more than three-fourths of all the States ratified the amendment, the question never became a practical one. When in June, 1858, at his home in Springfield, Abrar ham Lincoln startled the people by the announcement, " I believe this Nation cannot endure permanently, half slave and half free," and when in concluding that very remark able speech, with the prophetic voice, the uplifted eye, the inspired mien of a seer, he exclairaed, " We shall not fail if we stand firra, we shall not fail. Wise counsels may acceler ate, or mistakes delay, but sooner or later the rictory is sure to come;" he looked to long years of poUtical controversy; he expected a severe struggle and a final triumph through the use of all the agencies by which public opinion is influ enced and formed; and he anticipated the final triumph through the ballot-box. By a raind which ever sought for truth, which followed it through all the processes of reason ing, with instinctive sagacity he foresaw the struggle, and the triuraph of freedom. But he did not foresee, unless in those mysterious dim shadows, which sometimes startle, by half revealing the future, his own elevation to the Presidency; he 690 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. did not foresee that he should be chosen by God an,d the peo ple, to lead on to tha;); victory which he then felt was sure to come ; that he should speak the word which should emanci pate a race, and free his country. Nor did he foresee, that a martyr's death should crown a life, which was so consecrated to duty, a life which was to be thenceforth so filled with unselfish, untiring devotion to country and to liberty, that his example will be everlasting, growing brighter with years; forever to inspire the patriot, and give courage to those who labor, and struggle, and die, for the poor, and the oppressed; until in all the world, there shall be left no slave to be freed, no oppressor to be overthrown. This great revolution, corapleted by the adoption of the Constitutional amendment has been sketched, in these pages, very imperfectly; how far the poor description has lagged behind the subUme action of the drama, none can better ap preciate than the author. The visible steps in legislation and governmental action, by which the Republic was led up to final and universal emancipation, have been outUned. Some of those steps, and the raost important were : First, The army was prohibited from returning to rebel raasters, fugitive slaves : Second, The eraployraent of fugitive slaves as laborers in the army was sanctioned: Third, The passage of a law confiscating and conferring freedom upon slaves used for insurrectionary purposes : Fourth, The abolition of slavery at the National Capital : Fifth, The prohibition of slavery in all the territo ries : Sixth, A law giving freedora to all who should ser-<^e as soldiers in the array or in the navy : Seventh, A law emanci pating the slaves of rebels: Eighth, And raost iraportant of all, the great Preclaraation of Emancipation; emancipating the slaves in the rebellious States: Ninth, A law emancipat ing the farailies of all those who should serve in the army or navy of the United States : Tenth, The repeal of the fugi tive slave code: Eleventh, The Constitutional amendment abolishing and prohibiting slavery throughout the Republic. The responsibility, the honor of carrjdng these measures through, and sustaining them, justly belongs to the Repub lican party. This is the record on the slavery question to ANTI-SLAVERY MEASURES. 591 which that party proudly turns. AU of these measures were opposed by the Democratic party as a party. Individuals of that party voted for some of the measures, but such votes were few and scattering. On the passage of the bill to pro hibit slavery in the territories, the Democrats in the House of Representatives gave fifty negative votes against eighty- five ayes given by the Republicans. Upon the bill to repeal the fugitive slave laws the vote in the House was ayes ninety, noes sixty-two; all the noes, with two or three exceptions from the border States, given by democrats. The bill to aboUsh slavery in the District of Columbia, passed the Senate, ayes twenty-nine, noes fourteen ; and it passed the House, ayes ninety-two, noes thirty-nine. The negative votes were given by democrats. The Constitutional amendment abolish ing and prohibiting slavery passed the House, ayes (119) one hundred and nineteen, noes fifty-seven, (67,) the negatives all democrats. Such is the record. In addition to the anti-slavery measures above enumerated, others relatively of minor iraportance have been adopted. The Statutes of the United States have been purged of all laws made to maintain and secure slavery. The law exclud ing negroes from the witness stand, and laws creating various disabilities have been annulled. The great civil rights bill, designed especiaUy to secure eqiiality before the law, although vetoed by President Johnson, has been passed over his veto, by the Fortieth Congress. Yet the great work is not entirely finished ; some relics of the barbarous institution still linger in the Constitution and upon the statute book. These with the prejudices which have grown up with the institution will rapidly disappear. The formal adoption of the Constitutional amendment by the States, rapidly followed its passage through Congress. The resolution, as we have seen, passed Congre^ss on the 31st day of January, A. D. 1865. Illinois, as was fit, being the home of Lincoln, and under his inspiration, took the lead in ratifying the amendment. Not a day elapsed before it was ratified by both branches of the Legislature, and the result telegraphed to Mr. Lincoln. Then came Rhode Island, on the 2d of February, and on 692 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the same day Michigan, and then regenerated Maryland on the 3d; keeping pace with her, was New York and West Virginia. Then came on the 7th, Maine on the East, and Kansas on the West; and on the 8th, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania; and on the 9th, Old Virginia, through her few loyal legislators; then on the 10th, Ohio, and redeemed Mis souri; on the 16th, young Nevada, and Indiana, and Louisi ana, and then Minnesota, on the Sth and 23d. Then foUowed Wisconsin, Vermont, Tennessee, Arkansas, Connecticut, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Alabama, North Carolina, Georgia, Oregon, CaUfornia, Florida, New Jersey, and Iowa, in the order in which they are named. Thirty-two States in all, have filed with the Secretary of State, official evidence of their ratification of the amendment. Kentucky, Delaware, Mississippi, and Texas have as yet, failed to ratify. It must have been a proud moment, when WiUiam H. Seward as Secretary of State, on the 18th day of Deceraber, 1865, officially proclaimed the ratification of the amendment, and certified that the same " has become to all intents and purposes, valid, as a part of the Constitution, of the United States.* Who could have anticipated' when Mr. Sewai-d, in * The following correspondence gives in a, semi-official form the dates of the ratification : . Washington, July 23, 1866. Hon. W. H. Seward, Secretary of State, My Dear Sir: « « * May I trouble yon to furnish me the dates, at which the several States adopted the Constitutional amendment prohibiting slavery forever throughout the Republic, and a copy of your official certificate or proclamation, announcing suoh ratification by the requisite number of States. I cannot forbear congratulating you on the part you have taken in this great revolution. Few have had the felicity of living to witness such glorious results from their labors. How few could have anticipated when you began your anti-slavery labors, that you would live to officially proclaim that " slavery is no more," Very Eespectfully Yours, ISAAC N. ARNOLD. Depakment op State, Washington, August 22, 1866. Isaac N. Arnold, Esq., Sir : Your letter of the 23d ultimo, asking to be furnished the dates at which the several States adopted the amendment to the Constitution prohibiting slavery, etc., was duly received; but owing to the exigencies of public business in this Department, it has not been convenient to answer it until now. The dates of ratification by the several States, up to this time, are as follows : IlUnois, February 1st, 1865; Rhode Island, February 2d, 1865: Michigan, February 2d, 1865; Maryland, February 1st and Sd, 1865; New York, February 2d and 3d, 1S65: West Virginia, February 3d, 1865 ; Maine, February 7th, 1865 ; Kansas, February 7th, 1865; Massachusetts, February Sth, 1865; Pennsylvania, February Sth, 1865; Vir^ ginia. February 9th, 1865; Ohio, February 10th, 1865; Missouri, February lOth, 1865; THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. 593 1849, entered the Senate of the United States as the anti- slavery leader, that he would live, officially to proclaim ihe overthrow of slavery by Constitutional araendraent throughout the Republic ? Nevada, February 16th, 1865; Indiana, February 16th, 1865; Louisiana, PebruarY 17th, 1865; Minnesota, February 8th and 23d, 1865; Wisconsin, March 1st, 1865; Ver mont, March 9th, 1865 ; Tennessee, April, Sth and 7th, 1865 ; Arkansas, AprU 20th, 1865; Connecticut, May Sth, 1865; New Hampshire, July 1st, 1865; South Carolina, November 13th, 1865 ; Alabama, December 2d, 1865 ; North Carolina, December 4th, 1865; Georgia, December 9th, 1865; Oregon, December llth, 1865 ; California, Decem ber 20th, 1865; Florida, December 28th, 1865; New Jersey, January 23d, 1866; Iowa, January 24th, 1866. I transmit a copy of the certificate of ratiflcation, agreeably to your request. Thanking you for the congratulations with which you conclude your letter, I am. Your O^bedient Servant, WILLIAM H. SEWARD. February 4th, 1865. The Delegates from certain Territories obtained permission to enter this paper npon the Journal of the House : House of Kepbesentatives, Washington, February 1, 1865. Representing Territories which must soon become States, as Delegates deprived of the inestimable privilege of voting in this House, and feeling a deep Interest In the proposition to amend the Federal Constitution, forever prohibiting slavery within the jurisdiction of the United States, demanded alike by the exigencies of the times, the voice of the loyal people, and by our efforts in the field to suppress a rebellion inaugurated and sustamed for the purpose of perpetuating slavery, we cannot do less than state that the measure meets our unqualified approbation. H. P. BENNET, Colorado. J. B. S. TODD, Dacotah. J. F. KINNEY, Utah. W. H. WALLACE, Idaho. S. G. DAILY, Nebraska. FRANCISCO PEREA, New MexiX. CHARLES D. POSTON, Arixma. 38 OHAPTEE XXTI THE THIRTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS— TO ITS CLOSE. The Freedmen's Bureau Bill — Rebellious States not to vote IN the Electoral College — Reconstruction — Treatment of Union Prisoners — Rebel Prisoners — Attaciv of Brooks upon Butler — His vindication by Boutwell and Stephens — Close of the Thirty-eighth Congress — Valedictory of Speaker Colfax. AT this, the second session of the Thirty-eighth Congress, was finally passed the act creating the Freedraen's Bu reau. It encountered rauch opposition ; its friends differed so widely in regard to its provisions, that its details were finaUy settled by a conference coraraittee. Mr. Sumner, in the Senate, and Mr. Elliot, in the House, were its very zealous and earnest advocates. Mr. Sumner said " Emancipation is not enough. You must see to it, that it is not evaded or nullified ; and you must see to it especially, that the new made freedmen are protected in thos" rights which are now assured to them, and that they are saved from the prevailing caste which menaces slavery under some new alias;" and this he declared was the object of the bUl creating the Freed men's Bureau. The freedmen now rejoicing in recovered rights, must for a while be, in the language of Mr. Lincoln, " the VMrds of the nation," and protected from the tradi tional harshness and cruelty to which for generations they have been exposed. " The Government must be to them a shield." After several ineffectual attempts to agree upon a bill which should be satisfactory to both Houses of Congress, a com mittee of conference, consisting of Messrs. Wilson Harlan and WiUey, of the Senate, and Messrs. Schenck, BoutweU 594 PASSAGE OF THE FREEDMEN'S BtRBAU BILL. 595 and Rollins of the House, agreed upon a bill embracing, substantiaUy, the following provisions : It established in the War Department, to continue during the war, and for one year thereafter, " A Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands," to which was to be sub mitted the supervision of all abandoned lands, and the con^ trol of all subjects relating to refugees and freedmen, frora rebel States, or any territory included within the operations of the array. The Bureau was to be under the control of a commissioner to be appointed by the President, with the consent of the Senate. The Secretary of War was authorized to direct the issue of provisions, clothing, and fuel, as he raight deera needful for the iraraediate and temporary shelter and supply of des titute and suffering refugees and freedmen and their families. The President was authorized to appoint, with the advice and consent of the Senate, one assistant coraraissioner for each of the States in insurrection, to aid in the execution of the provisions of the act. The commission was authorized to set apart, under the direction of the President, for the use of loyal refugees and freedmen, such tracts of land within the insurrectionary States, as had been abandoned by rebel owners, or to which the United States had acquired title by confiscation, sale, or otherwise, not to exceed forty acres to every raale refugee or freedman, with the privilege of purchasing the same. This bill passed both Houses of Congress, and received the approval of the President. Mr. Lincoln selected to execute the law, as the head of the Freedmen's Bureau, Major Gen eral 0. 0. Howard, a man uniting the experience of one of the most brilliant soldiers of the war, great practical ability and good sense as an executive officer, with a christian life and character, and an earnest, sincere philanthropy, which com manded universal respect; no better appointment could have been made. Congress, before the day for counting and declaring the electoral vote, passed a joint resolution, reciting " that the inhabitants aud local authorities of the eleven seceding States, having rebelled against the United States, and having con tinued in a state of armed rebellion for more than three years. 596 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. and being in a state of arraed rebellion on the Sth of No veraber, 1864 (the day of the Presidential election,) there fore, ' resolved, that the States naraed were not entitled to representation in the electoral college for the choice of Pres ident and Vice President of the United States." ' This joint resolution was presented to the President, and signed by him ; but, on the Sth of February, he sent to Congress a mes sage, stating that the resolution had been signed by the Executive, in deference to the views of Congress, implied in its passage and presentation to him. He added, however, this stateraent especially iraportant as expressive of his views upon- the subject of reconstruction: "The two Houses of Con gress, convened under the twelfth article of the constitution, have complete power to exclude frora counting all electoral votes deeraed by thera to be illegal, and it is not corapetent for the Executive to defeat or obstruct that power by a veto, as would be the case if his action were at all essential in the raatter. He disclairaed all right of the Executive to inter fere in any way, in the raatter of canvassing or counting electoral votes, &c." * On the Sth of February, 1865, both Houses of Congress convened in the Hall of the House of Representatives, the President of the Senate presiding, for the purpose of opening and counting the votes for President and Vice Pres ident. The whole nuraber of votes given was two hundred and twenty-three, of which Abrahara Lincoln received two hundred and twelve, and George B. McClellan received twenty-one, for the office of President ; aud Andrew John son and George H. Pendleton, respectively, received the sarae number for Vice President, and, thereupon, Abra ham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson, having received the majority of the whole nuraber of the electoral votes for President and Vice President, were declared duly elected. The subject of reconstruction carae again before Congress, in various forras, at this session. The " Bill to guarantee to certain States whose governments have been usurped or over thrown, a republican form of government," was again con sidered, January 16th, 1865. • McPherson's History, p. S79. RECONSTRUCTION IN CONGRESS. 597 Mr. Elliot moved a substitute for the bUl, providing that the States declared to be in rebeUion shall not be permitted to resurae their political relations with the Governraent of the United States, until they shall have adopted a State con stitution, forever prohibiting involuntary servitude, and guar anteeing to all persons, freedom and equality of rights before the law,* Mr. Wilson of Iowa, proposed to amend by providing that Senators and Representatives should- not be received frora the rebellious States, until by act, or joint resolution of Con gress, approved by the President, or passed, notwithstanding his objections, such State shall havo been first declared to have organized a just local government, republican in form. Mr. Arnold of Illinois, offered an araendnent, which was accepted, abolishing and prohibiting slavery in all the terri tory in rebellion against the United States, f Mr. Kelley of Pennsylvania, proposed to araend the bill by proriding that all colored raale citizens in the rebeUious States, who could read the Constitution of the United States should be enrolled as voters. In support of this araendraent he said : J " The organized war power of the rebellion is on the eve of overthrow. It be longs to us to govern the territory we have conquered, and the question of recon struction presses itself upon our attention : and our legislation in this behalf will, though it comprises no specific provisions on the subject, determine whether guer rilla war shall harrass communities for long years, or be suppressed in a brief time by punishment administered through courts aud law, to marauders for the crimes they may comrait under the name of partisan warfare. At the close of an Inter national war, the wronged but victorious party may Justly make two claims ; in demnity for the past, and security for the future ; indemnity for the past in money or in territory; security for the future by new treaties, the establishment of new boundaries, or the cession of military power and the territory upon which it dwells. Indemnity for the past we cannot hope to obtain. When we shall have punished the conspirators who Involved the country in this sanguinary war, and pardoned the dupes and victims who have arrayed themselves or been forced to do battle under their fiag, we shall but have repossessed our ancient territory, re established the boundaries of our country, restored to our flag and Constitution their supremacy over territory which was ours but which the insurgents meant to dismember and possess. The other demand we may and must successfully make. Security for the future Is accessible to us, and we must demand it ; and to obtain it with amplest guaranties requires the adoption of no new idea, the making of no experiment, the entering upon no sea of political speculation. ? « ' • * Congressional Globe, 2d session, 38th Congress, page 281. t Congressional Globe, 2d session, 38th Congress, page 284. t Congressional Globe, 2d session, 38th Congress, page 281-288. 598 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY.. " Let ns meet the question fairly. Do our institutions rest on complexional dif ferences? Can we cement and perpetuate them by surrendering the patriots of theinsurgentdistrict, shorn of aU political power, into the hands of the traitors whom we propose to propitiate by such a sacrifice of faith and honor? Did God ordain our country for a single race of men ? Is there reason why the intelligent, wealthy, loyal man of color shall stand apart abased, on election day, while his ig norant, in temperate, vicious, and disloyal white neighbor par iclpates in making laws for his government ? What is the logic that denies to a son the right to vote with or against his father, because it has pleased Heaven that he should partake more largely of his mother's than ofthe father s complexion ? And is it not known to all of us that well nigh forty per cent, of the colored people of the south are chil dren of white fathers, who, after we subjugate them, will, with professions of loy alty only lip deep, enjoy the right of suffrage in the reconstructed States ? ShaU he, though black as ebony be his skin, who, by patient industry, obedience to the laws, and unvarying good habits, has accumulated property on which he cheer fully pays taxes, be denied the right of a voice in the government of a State to whose support and welfare he thus contributes; while the idle, reckless, thriftless man of fairer complexion shall vote away his earnings and trifle with his life or Interests as a juror? Shall the brave man who has periled life, and mayhap lost limb, who has endured the dangers of the march, the camp, and the bivouac in de fense of our Constitution and laws, be denied their protection, whUe the traitors in the conquest of whom he assisted, enjoy those rights, and use them aS instruments for his oppression and degradation." He raakes the following quotations from the testimony of Colonel Hanks : " I knew a family of flve who were freed by the voluntary enlistment of one of the boys. He entered tbe ranks for the avowed purpose of freeing his family. His name was Moore ; he was owned by the Messrs. Leeds, iron founders ; they resided within one of the parishes excepted in the Proclamation of Emancipation. He was the flrst man to fall at Pascagoula. Upon starting he said to his family, ' I know I shall fall, but you will be free.' " A negro soldier demanded his children at my hands. I wanted to test his affec tion. I said ' they had a good home.' He said, ' Lieutenant, I want to send my children to school; my wife is not allowed to see them; I am in yonr service ; I wear military clothes ; I have been in three battles ; I was in the assault at Port Hudson ; I want my children ; they are my flesh and blood.' " The grave, long years hence, wiU close over those who to the last day of their life would, were it in their power, overthrow the Government or revenge their supposed wrongs upon those who aided in sustaining it. The truly loyal white men of the insurrectionary districts need the sympathy and political support of all the loyal people among whom they dwell, and unless we give it to them, we place them as abjectly at the feet of those who are now in arms against us, as we do the negro whom their oppressors so despise. 1 cannot conceive how the Ameri can Congress could write a page of history that would so disgrace it in the eyes of all posterity as by consenting to close this war by surrendering to the unbridled lust and power of the conquered traitors of the South, those who, tiirough blood, terror, and anguish, have been our friends, true to our principles and our welfare. To purchase peace by such heartless meanness and so gigantic a barter of principle, would be unparalleled in baseness in the history of mankind. ************* " We are to shape the future. We cannot escape the duty. And ' conciliation, compromise, and concession,' are not the methods we are to use. These alas ! have been abundantly tried, and their result has been agitation, strife, war, and desola tion. No man has the right to compromise justice; it is immutable; and He whose law it is never fails to avenge its compromise or violation. Ours is not the work of construction, it is that of reconstruction ; not that of creation but of regenera tion ; and, as 1 have shown the principle of the life we are to shape glares on us RECONSTRUCTION IN CONGRESS. 599 lighting our pathway, from every page of history written by our Revolutionary Fathers. Would we see the issue of ' compromise, concession, and conciliation ? Sir, we behold it in the blazing home, the charred roof-tree ; the desolate hearthslde, the surging tide of fratricidal war, and the green mounds beneath which sleep half a mUllon of the bravest and best loved of our men." Winter Davis made the following prediction of the results which would follow a failure to pass the bill:* " If this bUl do not become a law, when Congress again meets, at our doors, clamorous and dictatorial, wiU be sixty-flve Representatives from the States now In rebellion, and twenty-two Senators claiming admission, and, upon the theory of the honorable gentleman, entitled to admission beyond the power of argument to resist it; for peace will have been restored, there wUl be no armed power but that of the United States ; there will be quiet, and votes wiU be poUed under the existing laws of the State, in the gentleman's view. Are you ready to accept that consequence? For if they come to the door of the House they will cross the thresh old of the House, and any gentleman who does not know that, or who is so weak or so wild as to suppose that any declaratory resolution adopted by both Houses as a condition precedent can stop that flood, had better put his puny hands across the flood of the flowing Mississippi and say that it shaU not enter the Gulf of Mexlcow" Mr. Dawes of Massachusetts, said :f " My only purpose is to Impress upon this House the very conclusion which finds sanction in the last section of this biU, namely, that no form can be prescribed, no law laid down here, no unbending iron rule flxed by the central Government, for the governing of that people, or prescribing the method in which they shall make their organic law. Each of them shall work out that problem for itself and in its own way. That form and system which is best adapted to Louisiana and Arkansas Is quite different from that which is ultimately to be adopted in South Carolina and Georgia. These are a people unlike In their habits aud pursuits, in their no tions. In their loyalty or disloyalty, whichever it may be. In each one of theso States the condition of things and feelings is unique, and flnds no counterpart In any other. In the States more particularly under consideration, the people are struggling to rise from chaos into the form of Republican organic law. The others to which I have alluded, are still wandering in the wilderness of treason and rebel lion, and rolling as a sweet morsel under their tongue the sin which has brought all this calamity npon us." The bill was finally laid upon the table by ayes 80, noes 65. J The question of the admission of Senators and members from Louisiana, Arkansas, and Virginia, was much discussed in both Houses of Congress at this session, but no final vote was taken. The public mind had been painfuUy impressed with the statements of the barbarities infiicted upon Union prisoners by the Confederate authorities. The exchange of prisoners * Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 969. t Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 937. X Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, page 1002. 600 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. had been interrupted, really and mainly because the rebel authorities refused to exchange colored Union soldiers, and refused to treat them as prisoners of war. The story of the treatment of Union prisoners at Libby prison and Belle Isle at Richmond, at Andersonville, Selma, and other places, and the massacre at Fort Pillow, filled the whole land with hor ror. The Comraittee on the Conduct of the war, were di rected by Congress, to investigate, and their report confirmed the conviction that the raost unparalleled cruelties had been inflicted upon the Union prisoners. It was estabUshed that at Andersonville, in 1864, there were 35,000 Union prisoners confined in a field of some thirty acres, and that 30,000 of thera were without shelter, or even shade ; crowded together, sleeping upon the ground without blankets, and many of them partiaUy naked. Their rations scarcely adequate to sustain life, and of a quality that approaching starvation, alone, could induce men to eat. Added to inadequacy and unwholesomeness of food, resulting in a condition nearly ap proaching starvation, want of shelter, and clothing, and the crowding of vast nurabers into a sraall space, was the raost brutal and inhuraan treatment by the guard ; often shooting down unarmed men apparently for amusement.* In the Senate, on the 16th of January, 1865, Senator Wade offered a resolution, that all Confederate prisoners, both officers and men, should receive the same rations, the sarae clothing, and be subject to the same treatment in every respect, as Federal prisoners of war in the power of the rebels. Senator Lane, of Indiana, urging the adoption of the reso lution, stated that there were about 45,000 Union prisoners in rebel prisons, and that the Governraent held about double that number of rebel prisoners. He stated in substance, that most of these 45,000 had been reduced by starvation to utter helplessness. Those of them who escape the slow torture of death by starvation, return emaciated and feeble, and unfit for service. We, as christians, feed, clothe, and provide for the rebel prisoners in our hands. Those we return to them, • See testimony on the trial of Wertz. Report of the Committee on Conduct of the war. See appeal to the President by oflicers confined at Charleston, dated August 1864; also Report of Sanitary Commission. TREATMENT OF PRISONERS BY THE REBELS. 601 we send in a condition of greater efficiency than when cap tured. " They are fed and fattened upon Government ra tions. We receive in return skeletons, shocking to human ity." "It is time," said he, "we resorted to a systera of strict retaliation, raarked by justice in every feature." Senator Wade said :* " Sir, I have no doubt ou investigation of this subject, that it Is a deliberate pur pose of theirs to destroy every prisoner that comes into their hands. They do not Intend that he shall be returned to us in such a condition that he can ever again take the field. Their Inhuman treatment is probably owing more to this con sideration than to mere feelings of malice. It is a system of savage policy, and it has had a most powerful effect on our army. Of the thousands of prisoners we have had in their hands, scarcely one of them is ever returned to us in such a con dition that he can take the fleld again ; while on the other side the prisoners that come into our possession are treated precisely the same as our own soldiers are, and they go back refreshed, recuperated, and ready to take the fleld against us, every man of them. I have no doubt that a, prompt and stern resort to this measure of retaliation wiU have as beneflcial an effect as the measure to which I have referred had in the case to which it was appUed." In regard to the exchange of prisoners. Senator Harlan said :t " I would rejoice to see every prisoner of ours held by the rebels released at once, but when I know that the release of a Union prisoner by the rebels requires the relea.se of a rebel prisoner by our Government, and that he wlU be at once thrown Into strongly fortifled works, and that you will be compelled to recruit three other soldiers to unite with our returning prisoner to make the combat equal j that four Uves are to be put tn jeopardy to recapture thf rebel whom we have released, I cannot criticise the Secretary of War if he should refuse to exchange prisoners from this time forward until the close of the war, even if a fair exchange could be secured ; but I apprehend there are very few Senators here who believe that a fair exchange can be effected. They so analyze all prisoners that they hold of ours, as to release those whose terms of service have expired or are about to expire. Their soldiers are mustered in practically during the war. Every southern citizen able to boar arms is enrolled as a soldier during the continuance of the war. Then when we release a rebel prisoner we put him into their army during the continu ance of the war, while in nine cases out of ten, probably, the soldier received by us in return will be at once well fed and mustered out of service. In addition to this, we know from the facts that have been developed by the Committee on the Conduct of the War, that they do not return to us ablebodled men, but only exchange the sick and dilapidated for those that are ablebodled and vigorous." Senator Suraner said :f " The resolution of the committee sets forth what we all too painfully know, that our prisoners— I quote now from the words of the resolution— have been sub jected to treatirent unexampled for cruelty in the history of civilized war, and finding its parallels only in the conduct of savage tribes; a treatment resulting it the death of multitudes by the slow but designed, process of starvation, and bj * Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 364. t Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 365. i Congressional Glrbe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 38L / 602 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. raortal diseases occasioned by insuflicient and unhealthy food, by wanton expo sure of their persons to the inclemency of the weather, and by deliberate assassina tion of innocent and unoffending men ; and the murder in cold blood, of prisoners after surrender.' " Sumner went on to say, " that the rule of retaliation could not be acted upon by our Governraent. We could enter into no such competition in barbarity." " We cannot," says he, " be cruel or barbarous, or savage, because the rebels, whora we are now meeting in warfare, are cruel, barbarous and savage." He quotes Dr. Leiber, as saying: "If we fight with Indians, who slowly roast their prisoners, we cannot slowly roast in turn the Indians whom we may capture." The northern people wUl not treat captured southerners, as our sons are treated by them. God be thanked, you could not do it, and if you could, how it would brutalize our people."* Mr. Lincoln, when these reports of barbarities came to him, and were authenticated, was deeply moved; but when urged to retaliate in kind, he said, " I never can, 1 can never starve men like that." Why is it, that Mr. Lincoln, and the northern people, never could carry on retaliation in kind ? Why is it, that the rebel authorities could be guilty of cruelties, paraUeled alone by the Spanish treatment ofthe Indians, and by the Inquisition? Will not the calm, just historian of the future truthfully say, this barbarity was the result of the brutalizing infiuence of slavery ? Senator Cowan said, " I think it would be irapossible to procure in the Araerican array, an officer, or a soldier either, who would stand by and see a raan starve; I do not believe it possible. A file of our soldiers might shoot a man in re taliation, but our soldiers would not infiict a slow and terrible torture." Senator Howard read frora the report of the Coramittee of Investigatiorijf to show, that the barbarities were resorted to " for the inhuman purpose of destroying the lives of our men by the slow process of starvation. After producing some of the evidence on the subject, he said : J * Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 382. t Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 386-7. % Congression Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 188. TREATMENT OF PRISONERS BY THE REBELS. 603 "Sir, the barbarities committed upon our men at Andersonville are absolutely indescribable. Human language Is impotent to bring home to the heart and the soul of a man the horrors of those scenes. Artists have been compelled to resort to something more expressive than human language, and painting aud engraving have been called in to aid in conveying to the mind the full idea of the brutalities practiced by the rebel authorities upon our soldiers. Out of those thlrty-flve thou sand, I presume not more than one-half, if as many, still survive to tell the tale of their sufferings ; and the testimony is as clear as the noon day sun that these bar barities were deliberately practiced upon our men for the double purpose of crip pling and reducing our armed force and of striking terror into the Northern popu lation in order to prevent enlistments. There does not remain ground for a doubt that the Rebel Government designedly resorted to the slow process of torture and death by starvation, and to freezing and starving united, operating minute by minute, hour by hour, day hy day, week by week, and month by month, until the man became a living skeleton and an idiot, no longer able to recognize his wife, his children, or his friends; no longer of any value either to himself or his country; and this for the purpose of weakening our miUtary arm and deterring our people from prosecuting the war. " Sir, I ask any man of humanity, any man who feels a respect for his country, does it not become us to punish these barbarities, and to punish them In the only way that is left us ? which is, the original and actual offenders having made their es cape or not being in our power, to seize upon their countrymen, prisoners in onr hends, and subject them to the same severities practiced against us. I know, sir, that the heart of a generous man naturally revolts at the practice of retaliation. I am not a stranger, I trust, to the ordinary feelings of humanity : but when the voice of my own countrymen cries to me from the dungeons of Libby, and from the putrid pools of Anderson viUe ahd implores me to interpose whatever power I may possess to deter the rebels from the infliction of such cruelties on them, I cannot, and, so help me GSod, I will not shut my ears to their cries. ******* " Sir, the history of the world, certainly the history of the civilized world, pre sents no parallel to the brutalities committed by the rebels. Bead the story of, Dartmoor prison, you find nothing to be compared with them. Read the story of the Black Hole of Calcutta, yon find nothing there. Read the story of the ancient British hulks. In which twenty thousand French prisoners were kept in close con finement for three or four years off the coast of England, in spaces not more than four and a halt feet high between decks, and you wlU find nothing there to be com pared with these cruelties. In the whole history of modern el villzed, war, these crimes stand out in hideous prominence. The cautious and careful Senator Foster, of Connecticut, said, that he "was astonished that any intelligent raan should express a doubt whether our prisoners in the hands of rebels, ft-ora the first day of the war, had been treated barbarously, inhuraanly, and that this treatraent continues to the present tirae." He said, "who are our opponents ? They are a band of insurgents, robbers, traitors, malefactors on land, and pirates on the deep; and because such men de scend to what would disgrace savages in the treatment of prisoners, not disgracing any ISTational name, for they have no National name to disgrace, shall we, who are citizens of the United States of America, each man feeUng that he has a part of the ISTational honor to sustain, do that which disgraces thera? 'So, Mr. President, no, no." * * Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thlrty-elgth Congress, p. 411-12. 604 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Senator Hendricks, of Indiana, who opposed the resolution, said, " I do not doubt now, that there have been cruelties, not justified by the usages of christian warfare, inflicted upon our prisoners in the South." * Senator Reverdy Johnson, opposing the resolution, said : " What I want, therefore, is such a systera of exchange as may put an end to these cruelties in the future,' leaving the past where it is ; leaving the Rebel Government, if they have resorted to the enormities stated in this resolution, as I hme no doubt they have, to the judgment of the civilized world, ' which will pronounce a judgraent of infamy to all concerned in them."t Senator Wade, in speaking of the influence of slavery upon the people, said : % " I know something about these Southern people. Habituated to slavery, with their hearts entirely hardened to the misfortunes and hardships of man in the per son of the poor slave, they have forgotten that he is human and that they owe him any respect ; and this hardening process did not stop with the slave, but the poor white man in the South is treated even at a greater distance and regarded as occu pying a lower position of degradation than the negro. They do not care anything about the private soldiers. They would as lief we starved their private soldiers to death as not, unless they wanted them returned to fill up their armies. They place them side by side with the negro whose fate they care nothing for. It is not the poor private soldier that I want to see subjected to these pnnisliments, because he is not responsible for this treatment, and because these accursed, hardened aristo crats look with as much composure on his fate as some here look on the fate of our soldiers in their barbarous hands. They care nothing for him ; they have lost aU feelings of humanity for those whom they consider the mere plebeian trash, whether black or white. But when you touch the chivalry, of whom their oflicers are composed, when you subject them to Ignominious labor in the trenches, or put them on the same treatment which they deal out to our soldiers, my word for It their hearts will be reached aud a remedy will soon be attained. * * * * " Is there nothing that will degrade a man? May he not steep himself in crime so deep that it is damnation and contamination to communicate with him? If so, is not Jeff. Davis that man ? Before Almighty God, if war has brought suffering, dishonor, and death upon our people, Davis and his associates are responsible for It; audit a common murderer ought to die once for the crime of murder, Jeff. Davis' death ought to be multipled a hundred thousand fold. Not only that, but think of the meanness that attaches to his crime. I was here when Jeff. Davis and company walked up to your desk, sir, and raised their hands to God, and swore to maintain the Constitution of the United States, and I was here when that oath was forgotten and they raised their accursed arm against this Republic, and, with all the power that they had acquired from it, turned about to destroy that very Constitution which they had before sworn to maintain. Is perjury no dis grace ? And does not an honest, just man lose confidence in his fellow-man when he finds him steeped in perjury? * * * Sir, his touch was contamination, and communication with him was dishonor. He had perjured his soul before God, and his arm was attainted and reeking with the blood of the bravest aud best ol the population of the United States." * Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 412. t Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 454. X Congressional Globe, Second Session Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 495. TREATMENT OF PRISONERS BY THE REBELS. 605 Senator Chandler, of Michigan, said : * " I saw the other day a Captain who has just returned from a seventeen months' Imprisonment in a Southern prison, a gentleman from Michigan, and he told me that he was Informed by the Superintendent of their prison that it was their policy, their flxed policy, that no prisoner who remained three months in a rebel prison should ever be fit to enter the United States army after his exchange and return home. If this was the barbarism of a single Individual who happened to have a number of onr prisoners in his charge, perhaps it would not be proper for ns to adopt retaliation as a policy ; but it has been proved over and over again that this is the policy of the rebels in the conduct of the war, their settled policy, their policy everywhere in every State, with every prisoner." Senator Sprague, of Rhode Island, said : f " Early in the history of this war it was my privilege to have intimate and near friends connected with the army. It was my good fortune to be with them npon the battle-field. I saw many of them wounded, others struck down. The patriotic people of my State demanded of me that their remains should be returned to the State; that the ground of that State should be hallowed by their bones and re mains ; that their history should be a part of the State. In obedience to that de mand I traveled with a proper escort to endeavor to secure their bodies ; and what did I flnd ? I found that the friends whom I had left wounded upon the bat tle-field had been murdered after we had left. I found the dead that we were obUged to leave upon the battle-field with their faces downward as a mark of indig nity. I found the heads of the bravest and best of my companions severed from their bodies to be used as drinking cups by Southern rebels. Of the remains of some of the best, most InteUigent, and bravest officers that ever served any cause, I found but the portion left from a bonfire. « * * This treatment has been practiced by the rebels upon Union soldiers to bring about the very result that has been brought about, and that is, an exchange of prisoners." Senator Saulsbury, of Delaware, suggested that the best measure for the relief of the suffering Federal prisoners was " peace." To induce peace, by the recognition of the Con federacy, was doubtless one of the motives inducing the rebel authorities to perpetrate these cruelties. He said : % " It Is peace, sir, that this country wants. Give us peace, and no Federal soldiers WiU ever again rot in Confederate bastlles or prisons, or starve in Confederate pens. Give ns peace, and the mother whose aching heart and streaming eyes you now witness will bless you for your deed. Give ns peace, and Instead of these acts of barbarism of which we hear, your land shall again bloom and blossom as the rose, Sir, In the place of retaliatory measures, in the stead of resorting to acts of cruelty to meet acts of cruelty, and to prevent tjjem in the future, I propose that your commissioners meet, and I invoke you, if this be the honest aim of the President of the United States, lend him your wlUing and cordial aid ; and then, sir, you will have no need for retaliation ; then, sir, your soldiers no longer wUl be starved or murdered or ill treated, but they shall return to their homes long left, to cheer their famiUes,. to rejoice again that peace blesses the land, and that their country does not require any further sacrifice of life or blood upon their part." • Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 496. + Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 516. X Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 520. LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. The resolution was amended so as not tj require retalia tion in kind, but the Executive and railitary authorities* were directed to retaliate upon the prisoners of the eneray in such manner, according to the laws and usages of war, as should deter him from the perpetration in future of cruel and barbarous treatment of our soldiers. N'o act of retalia tion, under this resolution, was ever inflicted upon any rebel prisoner. I have quoted from these debates on thtf subject of the treatment of prisoners of war, for the purpose of showing that in the highest deliberative body of the country the truth of the charges of barbarity and cruelty raade against the rebel authorities, was not disputed, except as to the extent of those cruelties ; and, also, to show by the evi dence produced in such debates, what sort of enemies slave holders are, and by what agencies they carried on the war to maintain slavery ; and, also, for the purpose, by placing on record the truth, to raake slaveholding odious. It was after the facts in regard to the barbarities practiced upon Union prisoners had been established, and proclairaed throughout the civilized world, that for the purpose of en deavoring to neutralize, or lessen the odium growing out of such a system, that rebel agents and syrapathizers in Eng land raised a fund for the purpose, as alleged, of relieving the wants of rebel prisoners in the hands of the Govern ment. These prisoners were notoriously better clothed, and fed, and cared for, than while soldiers in the rebel service. Lord Wharncliffe had been induced to become the agent of the parties raising this fund, and he asked, through Mr. Adams, representing the United States in Great Britain, that perraission be granted to an agent to visit the military prisons within the Northern States, and minister to the com fort of the Confederate prisoners. Mr. Adaras communi cated this request to Mr. Seward, who instructed Mr. Adaras to inform Lord Wharncliffe that the application was disal lowed. The Secretary said in his reply "that the United States had ample means for the support of prisoners, as well as for every other contingency of the war," and that the insurgents were suffering no privations that appeal for relief * Congressional Olobe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 621. brooks' charges against BUTLER. 607 to charity, either at home or abroad. In reply to a letter of Lord Wharncliffe, published in the London Times, in which he charged that Confederate prisoners in the hands of the Governraent were suffering unusual privations, Goldwin Smith, who had lately returned from a visit to the United States, during which he had visited the ca,mp where rebel prisoners were detained, published a letter, in which he bears testimony that the rebel prisoners were treated with the utmost liberality and kindness. He expressed his belief that the sentiment of the people at the ISTorth was strongly as possible in favor of a humane and generous treatment of prisoners, both as a matter of duty and as an instruraent of ultimate reconciliation, and this, notwithstanding they have " the proof before their eyes that their own soldiers are treated with the greatest barbarity in Southern prisons." One of the most exciting debates of this session arose out of a charge made by Mr. Brooks, of IJfew York, against General B. F. Butler, of Massachusetts, charging hira, while in comraand at B'ew Orleans, with being a "gold robber." General Butler addressed a note of inquiry to Mr. Brooks, which the latter brought to the attention of the House as a question of privilege, upon the ground that it was a chal lenge, or a note prelirainary to a challenge. Mr. Boutwell raised the poiut of order, that the letter was no breach of privilege, and the Speaker sustained the point of order, from which decision Mr. Brooks appealed. * He said : " With no desire to enter into an epistolary correspondence with General Butler, whose literary talents I well estiraate, and which, if not altogether Chesterfieldian, have nevertheless the vigor and nerve of Junius." " I choose to answer hira here, when I raade the reraarks of which he is supposed to complain." Mr. Ingersoll, of Illinois, desired that Mr. Brooks would explain to the House what reasons he had for calling General Butler a " gold robber." Brooks replied : " That is what I want to do, but I cannot do it in discussing a question of order." Mr. Ingersoll, thereupon, moved to suspend the rules so as to allow Mr. ?Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 376. 608 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Brooks to proceed. The motion was agreed to, and Mr. Brooks proceeded, reiterating the charge. The House adjourned, Mr. Stevens holding the floor. The next morning he yielded to Mr. Boutwell, who was the immediate representative in Congress of General Butler. After some prelirainary remarks, Mr. Boutwell said : * " Now, Mr. Speaker, I come to the testimony in reference to the 850,000 transac tion in New Orleans. I ask the attention ot the gentleman from New York to one point, because, when I have presented the evidence, I shall put to him a question on my own responsibility as a member of this House, as a Representative of a dis trict, as a citizen of this country, interested somewhat in the reputation of a man who is already historical, and who, since the administration of Hastings in India, has had a larger command and greater interests of the country placed in his hands than almost any other person, and I shall expect a definite and distinct answer to that question ; and therefore I put him on his guard at this early moment. The question I shall put to him is, (asking the Clerk first to read the extract from the gentleman's speech which was contained in General Butler's letter,) whether he reaffirms the statement which he made or whether he retracts it? And according to the course which he takes shall be mine as to some observations which I wiU then submit." He then read evidence, showing that Sraith, the clairaant of the $50,000 in gold allowed to have been robbed of him by General Butler, was an enemy of his country, and the firm of which he was a meraber were agents for the Con federate loan. He then read the order of General Butler, creating a military coraraission, consisting of General Shep- ley, W. IN". Mercer, and Thomas J. Durant, to inquire whether the specie in question was the property of the Con federate States, or had been used in any way to aid the Con federate States. He then read the evidence taken before such commission, on both sides, and after argument of counsel. The commission decided that, " With regard to the $50,000, the coraraission think there is ground for deten tion until the proper department at Washington can be heard from." This award was made June 17th, 1862, and on the 2d of July thereafter General Butler reports the facts to the Secretary of the Treasury, f He read other correspondence with the Secretary of War, aud the counsel of Smith, and then added : " In the first place, there Is no element of the crime of robbery in this transac tion from the beginning to the end. The seizure was made by a public officer, a mUltary commander, iu pursuance of what he beUeved theu to be his duty, ajid • Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 394. t Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 395. brooks' CHARGES AGAINST BUTLER. 609 what I believe a jury of his countrymen anywhere, on the evidence, would find to have been his duty under the circumstances in which he was placed. He submitted the whole question of the right of property, as far as it could be submitted, to a military commission, and he followed the decree, or award made by that commis sion, aud within fifteen days reported the facts to the Government, and from tliat day to tills he has always'been ready and responsible. He has again and again solicited the Department to take the money and assume the responsibility— either to take it as belonging to the Government, or pay it over to Samuel Smith & Co., and reUeve him." Mr. BoutweU then, after reading the charge raade by Mr. Brooks, demanded whether he reaffirms the charge, or re tracts it ? and closed by stating, " I yield the fioor for a reply." Mr. Brooks said : " When the gentleman concludes I shall be happy to make reply. The introduction of his remarks shows that he is not entitled to courtesy." " Mr. Botjtweli.. I understand, then, that the gentleman is neither prepared at this moment to reaffirm the statement made in that speech, nor to retract It. Ou this evidence, conclusive as to the falsity of the charge, the gentleman from New York stands sUent, and wUl neither reaffirm the declaration that he has made to this House and to the country, that Major General Butler of the army is a gold robber, nor wlU he, upon this evidence, retract It. Has it made no impression upon him ? Does he not comprehend it ? Does he yet persist in allowing that declaration made in his speech to stand upon the record? If he has a name to live, does not the dread of posterity inspire him to do justice to a servant of the country? Is he still silent ? Has he no voice to reaffirm what he has declared, or Is he yet destitute, shall I say of manliness, to admit that he was mistaken?" Mr. Brooks, in reply, araong other things, said : * " No man, Mr. Speaker, did more, or, I might say, as much, to excite and arouse the feelings of this country, and to bring about that hostility which led to the clash of arms as Major General Butler. Belonging to the Democratic party, and the most ultra of that party, he was ever flrst and foremost iu stimulating and encouraging that hostility and invective which would lead to excitement and to war- and when ever the Democratic party was disposed to compromise or make concessions in any way which would lead to pacification, he was the last of all to yield, and the first and foremost to bring about that collision of opinion which would lead to this clash of arms. And yet I, who am of the school of Clay, and of Massachusetts' own Webster, trained in obedience to the Constitution and laws, never even responsible for any of the errors of the Democratic party, hardly connected with that party except so far as it chose to honor me here with Its sympathy aud its votes, elected here upon the fioor of this House in opposition to the machinery of that party ; I am denounced by the Representative of this General Butler as a man more disposed to welcome a rebel uniform of gray than the blue uniform of a soldier of the United States ! " Sir, in the Charleston Convention, which led to the rupture of the Democratic partv and the election of Lincoln, if Butler himself had been the paid agent of Jeff. Davis and of the conspirators to destroy this Union, he could not have acted a more efficient or a more fatal part in sundering and dividing that party and bring ing about this collision than he did as a delegate from Massachusetts to that con vention. I never voted in my life for Jefferson Davis, while Major General Butler • Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 397. 39 610 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. voted fifty-seven times in the Charleston Convention for this same Jefferson Davis, to make him President of the United States. Compare my record then, then, with his. Compare my past with his. A sagacious man, like General Butler, a man of talent and power and capacity, must have known very well, while he was thus acting in the Charleston Convention, where all that action would lead; thatit would lead to a disruption of the party of the Democracy, and in that disruption to a triumph of the Republican party. ******* " The honorable gentleman from Massachusetts was pleased to say that since the record of Hastings in India no man had had so wide and so extensive a command as Major General Butler. The honorable gentleman from Massachusetts will permit me to say that I think that was a most unfortunate aUuslon. The history of Hast ings in India is in a good degree the history of Major General Butler at New Or leans and throughout all those regions on the Mississippi. I will not recall that history ; but I will recall the fact that years afterward the proudest and the loftiest spirits in the British Parliament, from Burke onward, arraigned Hastings for his conduct in India as I have arraigned Butler here ; and as others hereafter wlU arraign him on the floor ol^ this House, for his conduct in New Orleans and else where. And, sir the history of Butler will, I venture to predict, be the fate of Pastings ; supported by a ministry, though but feebly aud partially supported, yet recorded in history as a plunderer and a robber, and bequeathing to posterity a name immortal for that plunder and robbery alone." Mr. Stevens in conclusion, among other things, said : * "The evidence has done great justice and great favor to Major General Butler, for, sir, there is not a candid man, there is not an honest man in this House who will dare to say that that evidence is not a complete and perfect vindication of Major General Butler from all the charges made against him by the gentleman from New York ; it not only vindicates him, but shows him to have, in all his acts and in all his correspondence, acted, not only like au honest man and faithful officer, but like a gentleman and a well educated man. The whole of the corres pondence would do credit not only to his heart but to his great ability and his scholarship and his professional learning. And I will say here that, so far as pro fessional learning goes, I was long ago struck with his correspondence with the gentieman who was sent down there by the Qovernment, Mr. Reverdy Johnsop, General Butler showed more ability, more knowledge of the law of nations, and was more correct in his positions than that gentleman ; and if General Butler's doctrine had prevailed, 8800,000 in gold, which was seized by him, would have been kept from supplying the rebel armies, to which it was applied, when turned over, under the advice of the eminent counsel to whom I refer." Of the great public services rendered by Butler, he said : " The gentleman says that General Butler has done no service to his country. Service to his country ! If it Is true that he helped to kill the Democratic party, he did a great deal of service to the country. [Laughter.] I do not know that fact. That tooli place before secession, and is, therefore, a little further back than I choose to go. But if he was wrong tlien, the gentleman from New York has been going wrong ever since and getting worse ail the time, while General Butler has been getting better and better, and is now au excellent man. I wish to God they would all reform in the same way. [Laughter.] Did he not corae on in the midst of peril and seize Baltimore, which others had failed to do ? Did he not go to New Orleans and seize It, and administer its affairs better, and to the greater satisfac tion of every loyal man, than has been done since, although I do not draw com parisons ? Talk about that being a paraUel with the administration of Warren Hastings ! All that I have to say is this : Warren Hastings was made Imraortal by the talents of the counsel who prosecuted him. He was acquitted, as the public , * Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth, Congress, p. 400. CLOSE OF THE THIRTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS. 611 will acquit General Butler. The only difference is that there has been no pure and upright and manly eloquence in this prosecution, to immortalize General Butler as in the case of Warren Hastings." He thus speaks of John Brown : " He also talks about John Brown. The gentleman well knows that that class of people to whom he referred were very few in the United States. None of the Re- ]^ublican party belonged to that class. But, sir, I will state the difference between John Brown and the gentleman from New York. While I have not a word to say in extenuation of the conduct of John Brown, nor anything to say against his sentence, yet, sir, there are times in the history of men when there are such great evUs that the motives of some men who attempt, although in an irregular tnanner, to eradicate those evils, wiU overshadow aU the irregularities in the eye of pos terity, although we here at the moment cannot forget or forgive them. There are times, sir, when posterity will look beyond tlie inimediate step to see where a man proposed to land, what were his intentions and his motives, and they will judge according to the ulterior design. Now, sir, the motive of John Brown —honest, up right, but mistaken in his means — no mau who loves freedom can help applaud ing, although none of us would justify the means. But upon tlie principle which I have mentioned, when the gentleman from New York and myself will be mol- dering in the dust and forgotten, or only unpleasantly remembered, the memory of John Brown, I will venture to predict, will grow brighter and brighter through coming ages ; and the State of Virginia Itself, by its own freemen and its own freedmen, will, within the lives of some ^now present, raise a monument to his memory upon the very place where his gallows stood." ifothing could be more complete and conclusive than this vindication of General Butler, so far as regards the transac tion in question. The charge has- never since been repeated. The Thirty-eighth Congress drew towards its close. It had done its duty. Differing with the Executive on points of administration, as many of its merabers did, yet it had faithfully sustained him in carrying on the war. It had placed in his hands, with perfect confidence, the vast re sources of the country. It had voted increased taxes to maintain the N'ational credit. It had amended the EnroU raent Law to give it raore efficiency. It had obliterated for ever from the National Statute Book the barbarous slave code. More than all, and above all, it had passed the constitutional amendment, prohibiting and aboUshing slavery forever. The records of this Congress, and those of the Thirty- seventh, are full of the wisest statesmanship and eloquent expressions of the noblest sentiments of patriotism and huraanity. These records will long be consulted, for the story of the forensic confiict between liberty and slavery. That confiict is there recorded in the speeches, votes, and legislation, during this, the most eventful period of Araeri can history. He who in the future would fully comprehend 612 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. that history, raust study it in these eloquent discussions. The Thirty-eighth Congress ended, and passed into history, with the following valedictory of Schuyler Colfax, Speaker of the House :* " Gentlemen of the House of Representatives, the parting hour has come ; and yonder clock, which ' takes no note of time but from its loss,' will soon announce that the Congress of which we are members has passed into history. Honored by your votes with this responsible position, I have faithfully striven to perform its always complex aud often perplexing duties without partisan bias and with the sincerest impartiality. Whether I have realized the true ideal of a just presiding officer, aiding, on the one hand, the advance of the public business, with the re sponsibility of which the majority is charged, and, on the other hand, aUowing no trespass on the parliamentary rights of the minority, must'be left for others to de cide. But looking back now over the entire Congress, I cannot remembor a single word addressed to you which ' dying I would wish to blot.' " On this day, which by spontaneous consent is being observed wherever our flag floats as a day of national -rejoicing, with the roar of cannon greeting the rising sun on the rock-bound coast of Maine, echoed and re-echoed by answering volleys from city to city, and from mountain peak to mountain peak, tiU from the Golden Gate it dies away far out on the calm Pacific, we mingle our congratulations with those of the freemen we represent over the victories for the Union that have made the winter just closing so warm with joy and hope. With them we rejoice that the national standard, which our revolutionary fathers unfurled over the land, but which rebellion sought to strike down and destroy, waves as undisputed at this glad hour over the cradle of secession at Charleston as over the cradle of liberty at Faneuil Hill, and that the whole firmament is aflame with the briUiant glow of triumphs for that cause so dear to every patriot heart. We have but recently commemorated the birthday of the Father of his Country, and renewed our pledge to each other that the nation he founded should not 'be sundered by the sword of treason. And the good news that assures the salvation of the Republic is doubly joyous, because It tells us that the prayers of the past four years have not been un answered, and that the priceless blood of our brave defenders, so freely offered and so profusely spilt, has not been shed in vain. We turn, too, to-day, with a prouder joy than ever before to that banner, brilliant with stars from the heavens and radiant with glories from the earth, which from Bunker Hill to Yorktown, from Lundy's Lane to New Orleans, and from the darker hours of the rebellion in the past, to Savannah, aud Fort Sumter, and Cliarleston, and Columbia, and Fort Fisher, and Wilmington In the present, has ever symbolized our unity and our national life, as we see inscribed on it ineffaceably that now doubly noble inscription, ' Liberty and Union, now and forever, one aud inseparable.' " But, in this hour of gladness I cannot forget the obligations, paramount and undying, we owe to our heroic defenders >on every battle-fleld upon the land, and every wave-rocked monitor and frigate upon the sea. Inspired by the sublimest spirit of self-sacriflce, they have realized a mUlion-fold the historic fable of Curtius as they have offered to close up, with their own bodies, if need be, the yawning chasm that imperiled the Republic. For you and me, and for their country, they have turned their backs on the delights of home, and severed the tenderest of ties to brave death in a thousand forms; to confront with unblanched cheek the tempest of shot, and shell, and flame ; to storm frowning batteries and bristling intrenchments ; to bleed, to suffer, and to die. As we look from this Capitol Hill over the nation there are crushed and broken hearts in every hamlet ; there kre wounded soldiers, mangled with rebel bullets, in every hospital ; there are patriot graves in every church yard ; there are bleaching bones on every battle-fleld. It is the lofty and unfaltering heroism of the honored living, and the even more honored dead, that has taken us from every valley of disaster and defeat and • Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, pp. 1423-4. VALEDICTORY OF SPEAKER COLFAX. 613 pla.ced our feet on the sun-crowned heights of victory. The granite shalt may commemorate their deeds. Our American Valhalla may be crowded with the statues of our heroes. But our debt of gratitude to them can never be paid while time shall last and the history of a rescued nation shall endure. " If my voice, from this Representative Hall, could be heard throughout tho land, I would adjure all who love the Republic to preserve this obligation evei fresh in grateful hearts. The dead, who have fallen in these stmggles to prevent an alien fiag from waving over the ashes of Washington, or over the graves where sleep the great and patriotic rivals of the last generation, the hero of New Orleans and the Illustrious Commoner of Kentucky, cannot return to us. On Shiloh's plain and Carolina's sandy shores, before Richmond, and above the clouds at Lookout Mountain, the patriot martyrs of constitutional liberty sleep in their bloody shrouds till the morning of resurrection. But the living are left behind. And if the Sacred Record appropriately commends the poor, who are ever with us, to our benefactions and regards, may I not remind you that the widow and the fatherless, the maimed and the wounded, the diseased and the suffering, whose anguish springs from this great contest, have claims on all of us, heightened im measurably by the sacred cause for which they have given so much? Thus, and thus alone, by pouring the oU of consolation into the wounds that wicked treason ha« made, can we prove our devotion to our fatherland and our affectionate gratitude toward its defenders. " And, rejoicing over the bow of promise we already see arching the storm-cloud of war, giving assurance that no deluge ot secession shall again overwhelm or endanger our nation, we can join, with heart and soul, sincerely and trustingly, iu the poet's prayer : ' Now Father, lay thy healing hand In mercy on our stricken land ; Lead all its wanderers to the fold, And be their Shepherd, as of old. ' So ShaU our nation's song ascend To thee, our Ruler, Father, Friend; WhUe heaven's wide arch resounds again With ' Peace on earth, good wiU to men.' ' " We go hence -with our official labors ended, to the Senate Chamber and the portico of the Capitol, there, with the statue of the Goddess of Liberty looking down for the first time from her lofty pedestal on such a scene, to witness and participate In the inauguration of the Elect of the American people. " And now, thanking you most truly for the approbation of my official conduct which you have recorded on your Journals, I declare the House of Representatives of theThirty-eighth Congress of the United States adjourned sine die." Note.— The foUowing incident is so characteristic of Speaker Colfax, and so well Illustrates that goodness of heart, and sweetness of disposition, for which he is distinguished, that, although perhaps out of place here, I cannot omit it. The last days of this session were, as such days always are, full of cares and perplexities, everything and everybody hurried, and impatient, yet through all, Colfax retained his amiability. On the last night of the Session, when going into .the Speaker's Room, I saw a basket ;of most beautiful fiowers, marked : "lilrs. O., with the kind regards of Mr. Colfax." This lady was the wife of an officer of the House, who was very ill. This kind consideration, that did not forget the wife of a subordinate even iuthat last hurried night of the Session, shows an unselfish heart somewhat too rare among poUticians. OHAPTEE XXYII. LINCOLN'S SECOND INAUGURATION— THE END OF THE WAR. Port Fisher — Peace Conference — Wilmington and G-oldsboro TAKEN — Eebels resolve to arm the Negro — Columbus, S. C, CAPTURED — Charleston Falls — Second inauguration of Lincoln — He goes to Grant's headquarters — Military Conference — Sheridan at Five Forks — An assault along the whole line — Petersburg and Richmond evacuated — Lee surrenders to Gran'j.' — Johnston surrenders to Sher man — All rebel armies surrender — The President at Richmond — Returns to Washington — The grand review of the armies THE arraies of the Republic were not idle during tlie winter of 1864-5. Indeed, sorae of thera had progressed so far South as to raake the winter the raost favorable period for a campaign. At Christmas, as has been stated, Sherman, with his confident, victorious army, was at Savannah. The rem nants of Hood's discomfited and broken columns had been driven towards the Gulf by the well-organized, and tri umphant army of Thomas. Grant, with the Grand Army of the Potomac, was tightening his grasp around Petersburg and Richraond, holding Lee with all his force, and ready to take advantage of any diminution of troops in his front. The railitary operations of 1865 began with an expedition by a land and naval force corabined, to reduce Fort Fisher, situated near the mouth of Cape Fear River, and which comraanded the approach to Wilmington, N'orth Carolina. This port had been a principal place of blockade running, and foreign trade, by the rebels during the war. After the 614 CAPTURE OP FORT FISHER. 615 fall of Savannah, it became the principal gate through which supplies from abroad could be passed to the Confederates. The almost invulnerable works of the fort, were strongly garrisoned, for the eneray appreciated the importance of hold ing this position ; nevertheless, General Grant determined to reduce it. On the 13th of December a force of about 6,500 men, under General Butler, started from Fortress Monroe, to operate in conjunction with the naval force under Admiral Porter against Fort Fisher. Qn the 24th of December, Admiral Porter attacked the fort, without waiting for the arrival of the land forces ; but, after a bombardraent of five hours duration, the Adrairal withdrew his fleet. During the following night, General Butler's forces arrived, and on the 25th about 2,200 of the men were landed. The attack by the naval force was re newed. General Weitzel, who had the immediate comraand of the force on shore, captured two batteries, and some prisoners; but, after a careful examination of the ground and defences, he reported against the expediency of attempt ing to carry the place by assault. In the evening General Butler ordered the trooops to reembark, and notified Admiral Porter that he should sail for Harapton Roads. General Grant, the administration, and the public, Were greatly disappointed at the result of this expedition. But there was not a hearty cooperation between the land and naval force. It was not usual for Grant to abandon an object deemed important, until it was accomplished. Learning that the fieet was still off Fort Fisher, he advised Adrairal Por ter to hold on, and that he would raake another attempt to take the place. He selected General A. H. Terry to com raand the expedition, and about 1,500 men were added to those who made the former attempt. The expedition reached its destination on the evening of the 12th. The troops disembarked on the 13th of January; on the 16th the fort was assaulted, and after several hours' desperate fighting was captured with its garrison and armament. The Union force soon acquired entire control of Cape Fear River. For this gallant exploit. General Terry was made a Major General. 616 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. At the request of General Grant, Butler was reUeved from command, and Major General Ord assigned to the depart ment of Virginia and If orth Carolina. * During the winter of 1865, there were unofficial, and un authorized movements looking towards peace. Before Mr. Blair's visit to Richmond, an earnest friend of peace — honest, perhaps, but mistaken — approached Mr. Lincoln, and said in substance : " Assuming that Grant is baffled and delayed in his efforts to take Richraond, will it not be better to accept peace on favorable terms than to prolong the war ? Have not nearly four years of war demonstrated that, as against a divided If orth, a united South can make a successful de fence ? The South is a unit, made so, it is conceded, by despotic power. We of the N'orth cannot afford to secure unity by giving up our constitutional^ government ; we can not secure unity without despotism." The rebels, said this advocate for peace, " will fill up their exhausted armies by 300,000 negroes ; these negroes, under the training and discipline of white officers, and with freedom as their reward, will fight for them. The Union arraies will be very greatly reduced next year by the expiration of the terra of service of many of the raen. How will you fill up the ranks ? The people are divided ; one-third or raore, as the elections show, are positively aud unalterably against the war ; one-third or toore positively and unalterably for carry ing it on until the rebellion is thoroughly subjugated ; the remainder of the people — when the clouds gather black and threatening again, when another draft comes, and increased taxation, the peace men, and the tiraid, facile, doubtful raen, will go over to the opposition and raake it a raajority. You can now secure any terras you please, by granting to the rebels recognition. You can fix your own boundary. You can hold all within your lines — the Mississippi River, and all west of it, and Louisiana. You can retain Maryland, West Virginia, and Tennessee. Take this — make peace. *When the intelligence of the capture of Fort Fisher reached Washington, General Butler was being examined by the committee on the conduct of the war. In regard to the failure of his expedition. When the news was announced, " Thank God for that," exclaimed he. BLAIRS' VISIT TO RICHMOND. 617 Is not this as much territory, which was formerly slave terri tory, as the Republic can digest and assimilate to freedora at once ? Make this a horaogeneous country — ^make it free, and then iraprove and develop the raighty empire you have left. If you succeed in subduing the entire territory in re bellion, can the nation assimilate it, and ¦ make it homo geneous? Are the people in the Gulf States sufficiently intelligent to make freedom a blessing? You can people, educate, and bring up to the capability of self-government the territory you have within your lines, but taking it all — with its people accustomed to slavery, with the ignorance and vice resulting therefrom, is it clear that it is worth the blood and treasure it raay cost ?" The President was unmoved by these representations. His reply was brief, and emphatic : " There are," said he, "just two indispensable conditions to peace — national unity, and national liberty. The national authority must be restored through all the States, and I will never recede from the posi tion I have taken on the slavery question."* "The people," said he, " have the courage, self-denial, the persistence, to go through, and before another year goes by, it is reasonably certain, we shall bring all the rebel territory within our lines. We are neither exhausted, nor in process of exhaustion. We are really stronger than when we began the war. The purpose of the people to raaintain the integrity of the Republic has never been shaken." Mr. Lincoln justly regarded the Noveraber election as deciding that there should be no peace without union ; no peace until the supreraacy of the national authority should be everywhere recognized ; no peace without liberty to all. For the purpose of learning the views of the Confederate leaders, F. P. Blair, sen., a private citizen, but a raan of large political experience, and great infiuence, with raany family and personal friends among the rebels, on the 28th day of December, 1864, obtained from the President per mission to pass through the railitary lines South, and return. The President was informed that he intended to use the pass as a means of getting to Richraond, but no authority to ¦^See Mr. Lincoln's instructions to Mr. Seward, when sent to meet Stephens and Hunter at Fortress Monroe. 618 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. speak or act for the Government was conferred upon him. On his return he brought Mr. Lincoln a letter from Jefferson Davis, addressed to hiraself, the contents of which he had been authorized by Davis to communicate to the President, in which Davis stated he was now, as he always had been, wiUing to send coramissioners, or receive them, and " to enter into a conference with a view to secure peace to the ' two countries. ' " Thereupon the President addressed a note to Mr. Blair, dated January 18th, 1865, in which, after stating that he had read the note of Davis, he said he had been, was now, and should continue, ready to receive any agent whom Davis, or other infiuential person resisting the national au thority might informaUy send to hira with a view of secur ing peace to the people of " our common country." This note was delivered by Mr. Blair to Jefferson Davis. The visit of Mr. Blair resulted in the appointraent by Davis of Alexander H. Stephens, R. M. T. Hunter, and John A. Carapbell, to con fer with the President on the subject of peace, on the basis of his letter to Mr. Blair. When their arrival at the carap of General Grant was announced. Secretary Seward was charged by the President with representing the Governraent at the proposed informal conference. With the frankness which was characteristic of Mr. Lincoln, he instructed Mr. Seward to make known to Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell that three things were indispensable, to wit : 1. The restoration of the national authority throughout all the States. 2. No receding by the Executive of the United States on the slavery question, frora the position assumed thereon in the late annual message to Congress, and in preceding documents. 3. No cessation of hostilities short of an end of the war, and the disbanding of all forces hostile to the Government. He was further' instructed to inforra them that all pro positions of theirs not inconsistent with the above, would be considered and passed upon, in a spirit of sincere liberality. He was further instructed ". to hear and report, but not to consummate anything." However, before any conference was had, the President joined Secretary Seward at Fortress Monroe ; and on the 3d CONFERENCE AT HAMPTON ROADS. 619 of February, Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell carae on board the stearaer of the President, and had an interriew of several hours with hira. The conditions as contained in the President's instructions to Mr. Seward were stated and insisted upon. Those condi tions, it will be observed, contained an explicit stateraent that the Executive would not recede frora the Eraancipation Proclamation, nor from any of the positions which he had taken in regard to the abolition of slavery. The agents of Davis were also informed, that Congress had by a constitu tional majority, adopted the joint resolution, submitting to the States the proposition to abolish slavery throughout the Union, and that there was every reason to believe it would be adopted by three-fourths of the States, so as to become a part of the constitution. The rebel agents earnestly desired a temporary cessation of hostilities, and a postponement of the questions, but to this the President would not listen. So far from this, Mr. Lincoln said to General Grant : " Let nothing that is transpiring change, hinder, or delay your military movements or plans.' The conference ended without result.* * Mr. Stephens is stated by a Georgia paper, to have repeated the following char acteristic anecdote, as having occurred during the interview : " The three Southem gentlemen met Mr. Lincoln and Mr. Seward, aud after some preliminary remarks, the subject of peace was opened. Mr. Stephens, well aware that one who asks much may get more than he who confesses to humhle wishes at the outset, urged the claims of his section with that skill and address for which the Northern papers have given him credit. Mr. Lincoln, holding the vantage-ground of con scious power, was, however, perfectly frank, and submitted his views almost In the form of an agreement. 1. * * « « Davis had on this occasion, as on that of Mr. Stephen's visit to Wash ington, made it a condition that no conference should be had, unless his rank as commander or President should first be recognized. Mr. Lincoln declared that the only ground on which he could rest the justice of war— either with his own people or with foreign powers— was that it was not a war for conquest, for that the States had never been separated from the Union. Consequently, he could not recognize another government inside of the one of which he alone was President; nor admit the separate independence of States, that were yet a part of the Union. ' That,' said he, ' would be doing what you have so long 'asked Europe to do in vain, and be resigning the only thing the armies of the Union have been fighting for.' " Mr. Hunter made a long reply to this, Insisting that the recognition of Davis' power to make a treaty was the first and indispensable step to peace, aud referred to the correspondence between King Charles I. and his Parliament, as a trust worthy precedent of a constitutional ruler treating with rebels. Mr. Lincoln's face then wore that Indiscrlbable expression which generally preceded his hardest hits, and lie remarked: 'Upon questions of history I must refer you to Mi.. Seward, for he is posted in such things, and I don't pretend to be bright. My only distinct recollection of the matter is, that Charles lost his head.' That settled Mr. Hunter for a while." 620 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY, It appears from a statement of Mr. Hunter, one of the persons appointed by Davis to represent the Confederacy at this conference, that Mr. Lincoln was very explicit upon a most important point in regard to reconstruction as it is called. Mr. Hunter, before the rebellion, had been Speaker of the House of Representatives, Senator of the United States, and was one of the ablest men of the Confederates. In a carefully prepared speech made at Richraond on his return from the peace conference, he said: " Whenever we go into the United States as a conquered people, we give up the laws of the United States, and must take such as they choose to make for us ; and we go in without representation in making those laws; for," said he, "Mr. Lincoln told us, told me, that while we could send Represen tatives to the Yankee Congress, yet it rested with that Con gress to say whether they would adrait them or not."* If Mr. Hunter tells the truth, here is , another expression of opinion by Mr. Lincoln, directly upon the point that it rested with Congress exclusively to determine whether Representa^ tives from the rebellious States should be admitted. This statement, made directly after the conference, upon a point upon which Mr. Hunter would naturally feel peculiarly solicitous, may be regarded as entitled to consideration ; especiaUy, as it is in harmony with the stateraents and positions of Mr. Lincoln upon other occasions. Mr. Lincoln, raight now well feel confident of early, and decisive success. Grant held the forces of Lee so that they could not safely leave their fortifications. Thomas, with a victorious army, was in the West; Sherman, with his invin cible army in the South, and it only remained for the com prehensive mind of Grant, after destroying some additional outposts, to close in, and crush the waning miUtary power of , the rebels. The array of Hood, having been defeated and nearly destroyed, General Grant directed General Thoraas to send General Schofield, with his corps to the East; it was proraptly sent, reaching Washington on the 23d of February, and was immediately dispatched to North Caro lina. That State was now constituted a military Departraent, *Thls speech will oe found quoted In Appleton's Encyclopedia of 1865, p. 191. THE REBELS RESOLVE TO ARM THE NEGROES. 621 and General Schofield assigned to its command, and placed under the orders of General Sherraan. General Schofield, in cooperation with the fleet of Admiral Porter, proceeded to reduce Wilmington. The Union troops followed, and entered that city on the morning of the 22d of January, the enemy having retreated towards Goldsboro. In this extremity, General Lee was, on the 2d of February, appointed to the command of all the armies of the Con federacy. The rebel authorities, in their desperate fortunes, now resolved to call upon the poor, despised negro for aid. Freedora was now offered to him if he would fight for his master. Mr. Benjamin, the Secretary of State of the Con federacy, in a public meeting after the peace conference at Hampton Roads, said the Confederates had 680,000 black men, and he expressed his regret that they had not been called into the field. He continued : " Let us now say to every negro who wishes to go into the ranks on condition of being free, "go and fight — you are free.' My own negroes have been to me and said, ' master set us free and we'll fight for you.' " He continued: "You must make up your minds to try this, or see your army withdrawn from before your town. * * * I know not where white men can be found." General Lee had long before recommended this policy, and declared that the war could be carried on only by the employment of negro soldiers. On the 16th of February, the Legislature of Virginia passed resolutions authorizing and consenting that such number of able bodied slaves might be enlisted into the military service, as might be deemed necessary. A bill was passed in the Confederate Congress, authorizing the employment of slaves, but it came too late to be of serrice, if, indeed, it ever could have availed. Sherman, on the Ist of February, started his army from Savannah. A broad track of desolation, sweeping along the great lines of railroads, marked his path. On the 17th, he captured Columbia, South Carolina ; thence, he moved on Goldsboro, North Carolina, by Fayetteville, reaching the latter city on the 12th of March, and opening communica tions with General Schofield. On the 25th of February, Gen eral Joe Johnston was appointed, by Jefferson Davis, to 622 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. command the army of the Tennessee, and all the troops of South CaroUna, Georgia, and Florida. On the 15th of March, Sherraan resuraed his march upon Goldsboro, and after a severe fight at Averysboro, corapelled the eneray to retreat. On the 18th, the corabined forces of the eneray under Johnston, attacked Sherraan's advance at BentonvUle, capturing three guns and driving it back upon the main body, but on the night of the 21st, they retreated. Sherman's forces now united with those of Generals Terry and Schofield. Among the raost iraportant fruits of the cam paign of Sherman into South Carolina, none were more gratifying than the fall of Charleston. The march of Sher man to Columbia, compelled its evacuation, which took place on the night of the 17th, and it was occupied by the Union troops on the 18th of February. The Union fiag had been lowered at Sumter, the 14tli of April, 1861. For nearly four years, this proud city had successfully resisted all attacks upon it, but was forced at last to yield to the array of Sher man, which had marched unchecked half across the Republic, frora North to South, and from West to East. It was now occupied and held by colored troops, many of them recruited from South Carolina. Here, as elsewhere throughout the slave States, the Union soldiers were received by the negroes with acclamations of delight. They followed the National flag through the streets singing : " Ye's long been a'comln, . Ye's long been a'comln, etc, Por to take de land. " And now ye's a'comln. And now ye's a'comln, etc., For to rule de land." While the Union arraies were everywhere raarching on frora victory to victory, let us return to the Capital, to witness the second inauguration of him, who was the central figure of the vast and complicated machinery now raoving forward with irresistible force to crush into one common grave, slavery and rebelUon. On the night of the 3d of March, 1865, as is usual on the last night of the session, the President, with his Cabinet, waa Lincoln's dispatch to grant. 623 at his room in the Capitol, to receive the numerous acts which always pass Congress during the last hurried hours of the session. The Thirty-eighth Congress, on the 3d of March, continued its session from 7 o'clock in the evening until 8, A. M., on the morning of the 4th. It was a stormy night, and while the President was thus waiting, exchanging con gratulations with Senators and members, there came to the Secretary of War, a telegrara frora General Grant, announc ing that Lee had at last sought an interview with him for the purpose of trying to arrange terms of peace. We now know from Lee's testiraony taken before a secret coramittee of the Rebel Congress, that he had for a considerable time before this, lost hope in the success of the rebellion. Lee had ad vised General Grant that he was clothed with authority to act. The dispatch was handed to the President, and after reading it, and refiecting for a few moraents, he wrote the following reply, which was submitted to his Cabinet then present. It was then signed by the Secretary of War, and telegraphed to General Grant : " Washington, March 3, 1865 — 12 p.m. " Lieutenant General Grant : " The President directs me to say to you that he wishes you to have no conference with General Lee, unless it he for the capitulation of G-eneral Lee's army, or on some minor and purely military matter. He instucts me to say that you are not to decide, discuss, or confer upon any political question. Such questions the President holds in his own hands, and will submit them to no military conferences or conventions. Meantime you are to press to the utmost your military advantages. "EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of 'War." The morning of the 4th of March was still cloudy and stormy, but as the hour of 12 approached, the rain ceased, the clouds disappeared, and the bright, genial sun came forth in all its splendor. Crowds of the best and noisiest of the land, those who had given their time, their means, and their best exertions to the country in civil and military ser vice, had gathered to the Capital to witness the second inau guration of a man now the most beloved and revered of all in the land. As the procession started for the Capitol, a 624 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. brilliant star made its appearance in the sky, and the incident was regarded by many, as an omen of peace. The two Houses of the Thirty-eighth Congress adjourned sine die, at 12 o'clock. A special session of the Senate, had been con vened, and Andrew Johnson, at that hour appeared, took the oath of office and became Vice President, and the pre siding officer of that most dignified body in America, the Senate ofthe United States. There were then present, beside the members of both Houses of Congress, the Judges of the Supreme Court in their official robes, the Diplomatic Corps, brilUant in the Court costumes of the respective nations they represented. A crowd of distinguished officers of the army and navy in full uniform ; prominent citizens, scholars, states men, bishops, clergy, governors, judges, editors, from all parts of the Union, on the floor of the Senate. The galleries were full of ladies, and citizens, especially of soldiers, who had come in from the hospitals and camps about Washing ton, to witness the inauguration of their beloved Chief. The Vice President was regarded with especial interest. His en trance into the Senate chamber, recalled the bold and patri otic words he had, from his seat in the Senate, hurled against the leading traitors ; words, the utterance of which had made him Vice President. He was greeted with cheers; cheers which his appearance and words soon silenced into astonish raent and hurailiation. At 12.30, followed by the brilliant asserably frora the Senate charaber, the President was con ducted to the eastern portico of the Capitol, again to take the official oath of office, and pronounce his inaugural. A vast crowd met him, but very different from that which greeted hira on his first inauguration. Now a crowd of citi zens and soldiers, who would wilUngly die for their Chief Magistrate, thronged the area in front of the Capitol. It was touching to see the long lines of invalid and wounded soldiers in the National blue, some on crutches, sorae who had lost an arm, many pale from unhealed wounds, who had sought permission to witness the scene. As the President reached the platform, and his tall form, high above his associates, was recognized, cheers and shouts of welcome filled the air ; and not until he raised his arm in token that he would speak, could they be hushed. He paused a moment, and looking Lincoln's second inauguration. 625 over the brilliant scene, still hesitated. What thronging raeraories passed through his mind ! Here, four years ago, he had stood on this colonnade, pleading earnestly with hia " dissatisfied feUow countrymen," for peace, but they would not heed hira! He had there soleranly told thera that, in their hands, and not in his, was the raoraentous issue of civil war. He had told thera they could have no conflict, without being theraselves " the aggressors ;" and even while he was pleading for peace, they took up the sword, and he was compeUed to "accept war." Now, four long, weary years of wretched, desolating, cruel war, had passed ; those who made that war, were everywhere being overthrown ; that cruel institution, which had caused the war, had been destroyed, and the dawn of peace was already brightening the sky behind tbe clouds of the storra ! Chief Justice Chase adrainistered the oath. Then with a clear, but at times a saddened voice, President Lincoln pronounced this his second — his last inaugural. " Fellow-Countrymen : — At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office, there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a state ment somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued, seemed very fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, Uttle that is new could be presented. "The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to rayself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured." On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago, all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avoid it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted alto gether to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents 40 626 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. were in the city, seeking to destroy it with war — seeking to dissolve the Union and divide the effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the Nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came. One- eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not dis tributed generally over the Uhion, but localized in the South ern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was soraehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest, was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union by war, while the Governraent clairaed no right to do raore than to restrict the territorial enlargeraent ofit. " Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with, or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. " Both read the sarae Bible and pray to the sarae God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in -wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayer of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. Woe unto the world because of offenses, for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whora the offense coraeth. If we shall suppose that American slavery ia one ofthese offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which having continued through His appointed time He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern there any departure from those Divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him ? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we praj', that this mighty scourge of war raay speedily pass away. Yet if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsraan's two hundred and fifty years ' LINCOLN'S SECOND INAUGURAL 627 of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so, still it must be said, that, the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether. " With malice towards none, with charity for all, with firm ness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us finish the work we are in, to bind up the Nation's wounds, to care for him- whd shall have borne the battle, and for his widow and his orphans, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and a lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations." Since the days of Christ's Sermon on the Mount, where is the speech of Magistrate, Prince, or Ruler, which can com pare with this ? May we not, without irreverence, say that the passage comraencing: " Fondly do we hope — fervently do we pray — that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsraen's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn by the lash shall be paid by another, drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said that the judgraents of the Lord are true and righteous altogether," is worthy of that Holy Book, which daily he read, and frora which, during his long days of trial, he had drawn inspiration and guidance ? Where else, but frora the teachings of the Son of God, could he have drawn that Christian charity which pervades that last sentence, in which he so unconseipusly describes his own moral nature: "with malice towards none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphans ; to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace araong ourselves, and with all nations." No State paper, in Araerican annals, not even Washington's farewell address, has made a deeper irapression upon the people. Coraing down frora the Capitol after its deUevery, aud meeting Dr. Channing, the chaplain of the House, he said : 628 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. " Mr. Lincoln's inaugural is the finest State paper in all his tory." A distinguished statesman and jurist, frora New York, after hearing the inaugural, said to a friend of the President frora Illinois : " As Washington's narae grows brighter with tirae, so it will be with Lincoln's. A century frora to-day that Inaugural will be read as one of the raost sublirae utterances ever spoken by man. As Washington's is the great name of the revolution, so will be Lincoln's of the civil war; and Lincoln will perhaps occupy a higher position in history than Washington." "Yes," was the reply, " if he crushes the rebellion ; yes, if he overthrows slavery ; yes, because the events with which he has had to do, affect thirty millions of people, instead of three." This inaugural, in its solemn recognition of the justice of Alraighty God reminds us of the grand old words of the Hebrew prophets. When this paper crossed the Atlantic, there, as here, it received the most profound attention. The leading statesmen of the continent, the leading minds of Great Britain and France, through the press, and in Parlia ment, found no words adequate to express their admiration. There was one feature of this inauguration entirely new ; it was attended by a vast crowd of freedmen. From Wash ington and Baltimore, from the country about, in Maryland and Virginia, they gathered by thousands to witness the in auguration of him whora they called thdr President, their benefactor. Lincoln possessed those qualities, and had ren dered such services, that, if he had Uved in the days of raythology, he would have been placed among the gods. A majority of the negro race now regard him as Divine, and it is doubtful if they will ever be able to see him simply as a man. When the clouds broke away, and the sun carae out in its brilliancy on inauguration day — especially when a star appeared at raid-day, these siraple, excitable, strongly relio-i- ous and superstitious people, saw in these natural exhibitions the palpable interposition of God. The only change raade in the Cabinet, was one raade necessary by the retirement of Mr. Fessenden, who re signed to take his seat in the Senate. On the sixth of March Hugh McCuUoch, of Indiana, was appointed Secretary of CONFERENCE AT GRANT'S HEADQUARTERS. 629 the Treasury. Jaraes Speed, of Kentucky, had been, in 1864, appointed Attorney-General in place of Edward Bates, who had resigned. The appointment of Mr. McCul- loch, from Indiana," led to the resignation of Mr. Usher, who had succeeded Caleb Smith, of Indiana, as Secretary of the Interior. He resigned, to take effect on the 15th of May, and James Harlan, Senator from Iowa, was appointed his successor. And now Mr. Lincoln's whole heart was with the move ments of the armies, which he confidently hoped would be decisive. He was conscious that the end approached, and deterrained to spend sorae tirae at the headquarters of General Grant, near Petersburg. On the 27th of March, 1865, the President, as Commander- in-Chief, met his leading and most trusted generals then in the field, at the headquarters of General Grant, at City Point, to arrange the final raovements against Lee and John ston. An artist has worthily depicted the scene of the meet ing of the President and his Cabinet, when he read to them his Proclamation of Emancipation. This meeting, at Grant's headquarters, yet awaits the pencil which shall picture this scene, second in interest only to that. There was the tower ing form of Lincoln, his rugged face which had been so deeply furrowed with care and anxiety, now radiant with hope and confidence. There was the short, sturdy, resolute form of the hero of Vicksburg, so firm and iron-like ; every feature of. his face, and every attitude and movement, so quiet, yet each expressive of inflexible will, and never-falter ing determination "to fight it out on this line." There, too, was the tall forra of Sherman, with his broad, intellectual forehead, his nervous restlessness, his sharply outlined face, bronzed by that magniflcent carapaign from Chattanooga to Atlanta — from Atlanta to the sea — and now fresh from the conquest of Georgia and South CaroUna. There, too, was Meade, the hero of Gettysburg, the ever faithful Lieutenant of Grant, in the terrible campaign, now, after all its bloody conflicts, to be crowned with coraplete success. There, too, was the smaU, sinewy form of Sheridan, the embodiment of fiery energy, and restless activity ; and there 630 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. was Ord, ever a gallant and indefatigable soldier. Here the plans of these great leaders were aU discussed and perfected, and each went forth to execute his assigned part, in the general, corabined raoveraent against the foe. A general movement of the forces around Richmond had been decided upon. It began on the 29th, and ten days' marching and fighting finished the campaign. The rel^ftls, however, on the 25th, raade one last effort to break through the lines of Grant; they assaulted and took Fort Steadraan, and a part of the line to the right and left of it, but soon the reserves were brought up, and the eneray was driven back with a heavy loss in killed and wounded, and 900 prisoners. General Grant says : " I had spent days of anxiety lest each raorning should bring the report that the enemy had re treated the night before. I was firmly convinced that Sher man's crossing the Roanoke would be the signal for Lee to leave. With Johnston and hira corabined, a long, tedious, and expensive campaign, consuming most of the summer, might becorae necessary." This, Grant now determined to prevent. To effect this object, he sent Sheridan with the cavalry far to the left, foUowed by Warren with the Fifth Corps, and Humphreys with the Second. Troops were drawn from the James, to occupy the lines around Peters burg, and take the place of those which Jbllowed Sheridan to the left. The cavalry advanced and occupied Dinwiddie Court House. The line of entrenchments around Rich mond and Petersburg extended near forty railes. Grant had resolved to turn Lee's right, and, if possible, interpose a force between him and escape ; and if Lee should so weaken his lines by sending troops to our extreme left, as to make it practicable, assault and carry the works in his front. When Sheridan reached Dinwiddie Court House, he was, according to the original design, to cut loose, and start on an expedi tion against the South-side, and Danville Railroads. But on the night of the 29th, Grant modified his plan in this respect, and wrote to Sheridan : " I now feel like ending the matter, if it is possible to do so, before going back. * * In the raorning, therefore, push round the eneray, and get on his right-rear. We will act altogether as one army here, SHERIDAN AT FIVE FORKS. 631 until it is seen what can be done with the enemy." But Lee had discovered the raoveraent, and perceiving how fatal to him would be its success, he struggled to interpose a shield, to ward off the attack of the eager and earnest Sheri dan. If Sheridan turned his right, got in his rear, and cut the railroads, his army was lost. And yet with a line of works frora north-east of Richmond, extending across the James, and to the south-east of Petersburg, a distance of thirty-five miles to be guarded; a watchful and powerful army along this front ready to spring forward and seize any weak point, it was difficult for him to detach any very large force to meet the assault of Sheridan. A storm interposing, retarded the approach of the Union infantry and artillery sent to support Sheridan, and gave Lee time to concentrate his force. He anticipated the attack, and made an irapetu ous assault upon Warren, but it was finally repulsed, with a severe loss to Lee. Sheridan appreciating the vital importance of seizing Five Forks, the centre of five roads, and situated about four miles west of Lee's entrenched line, and the key to the position which he was struggUng to hold, he deterrained to secure the point. On the 31st of March, while with a portion of his force, he occupied the attention of the enemy, with an other he moved rapidly to Five Forks, and seized the posi tion. The rebel comraander sent a force too strong to be resisted, and drove out the cavalry of Sheridan, compelling him to return again to Dinwiddie Court House. Here, pressed by superior numbers, Sheridan dismounted his troops and placed them behind a slight breast-work, and repulsed an attack of infantry. Reenforcements were ordered to join Sheridan as rapidly as possible. This officer now, as soon as reUeved, imraediately renewed the atterapt to get possession of the iraportant position of Five Forks. Towards this point Lee was concentrating all the force he could spare. Sheridan, at the h'cad of the cavalry, again pushed forward and drove hira within his works at the point of the converging roads. Meanwhile the Fifth Corps had joined him. While holding the front, he made a feint as though to turn the rebel right, while he ordered Warren to 632 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. fall with full force on their left. While Warren executed this order with great personal heroisra, capturing raen and guns, the cavalry charged full on the rebel right and front, and the result of this brilliant affair was the capture of 5,000 prisoners, and many guns ! At early dawn on Sunday morning, the 2d of April, Grant ordered an assault upon the weakened lines in front of Petersburg. This was raade along the whole line frora the banks of the Apporaattox to Hatcher's Run, by Parke, Wright and Ord. The line was everywhere carried, and then away beyond Hatcher's Run — away to the extrerae left — the Union troops carried everything before them, and the rebel forces were everywhere in full retreat. During the fierce cannon ade of that Saturday night, Lee ordered Longstreet, whose forces had held the lines north of the James, to come to his relief at Petersburg. The bells of Richraond tolled, and the drura s beat, caUing railitia, citizens, clerks, everybody who could carry arras, to raan the lines frora which Long- street's troops were retiring. Then in that ill-fated city — " The beat of the alarming drum Boused up the soldier, ere the morning star. While thronged the citizens, with terror dumb. Or whispering, with white lips, the foe, they come ! they come I " And there was mounting in hot haste, the steed. The mustering squadron, and the clattering car Went pouring forward, with Impetuous speed, And swiftly forming " — not " in the ranks of war," but — io escape. At eleven A. M. of that Sunday, Lee sent a dispatch to Jefferson Davis, which he received in church, saying Peters burg and Richraond could no longer be held. And now the coraraander of the Confederate array strained every nerve to escape ; but Grant had deterrained then and there to " make an end of it," and pressed on with all possible rigor. Sheridan, with his cavalry, and the Fifth Corps, under Warren, were far to the southwest, already blocking the path of escape south of the Appomattox. Crossing to the north side, Lee struck westerly towards Amelia Court House. All that night the remains of the once proud and valiant array of Northern Virginia, which had fought and THE PURSUIT OF LEE. 633 struggle^ with a heroisra worthy of a nobler cause, pressed forward, and by morning were sixteen railes from Peters burg. In the early dawn of Monday, April 3d, the skirmish line of Grant's array advanced, and soon discovered that Petersburg had been evacuated. At the sarae tirae the troops north of the James discovered Richmond to be on fire, and General Weitzel sent forward a cavalry party, which entered the city, and once raore. restored the star- spangled banner over the capital. But not for Richraond did the iron will of Grant turn aside for a single moment from his fixed determination to destroy the army of Lee. He pressed the pursuit with all his energy, and Lee now struggled painfully to escape. During the 3d, Lee reached Amelia Court House, on the Danville Road, thirty-eight miles west of Richmond. There he expected to find a depot of rations for his nearly faraished army ; they had by mis take been forwarded to Richmond, and consumed in the con- fiagration of that city. Here, in consequence, he was com pelled to reraain until the 5th, to obtain food, and this gave time to the indefatigable Sheridan, with his cavalry, to strike the Danville Railroad at Jetersville, seven miles to the southwest of Araelia Court House. Late in the afternoon of the 5th, Meade, with the Second and Fifth Corps, came up with Sheridan. Lee was still at Amelia Court House. On the night of the 5th the rebel commander made another raove with the hope of reaching Farmville, west twenty-five railes ; there he hoped to cross the Appomattox, destroy the bridge, and fly to the mountains. Meanwhile the army of the James, under Ord, came down, and a light coluran in advance met the head of Lee's column near Farraville, which its coraraander. General Reed, heroically attacked, and by such attack detained. Reed was killed, sacrificing himself and his sraall coramand to secure the capture of Lee's army. This delay enabled General Ord to come up, upon which the rebels entrenched. In the afternoon, Sheridan again struck the enemy, capturing sixteen pieces of artillery, 400 wagons, and detained the rebel force until the Sixth Corps could reach him, when a general attack was made, resulting in the 634 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. capture of 6,000 prisoners, including EweU, and many gen eral officers. The next day, the 7th, the pursuit was re newed, and it was ascertained that Lee had succeeded in crossing to the north side of the Appomattox; but so close was the pursuit, that the retreating array was prevented from destroying the bridge, and the pursuing column foUowed on its heels. The escape of the rebel army was now hopeless. It was between the Appomattox and the Jaraes, exhausted of suppUes, its cavalry and draught horses starving, and the raen by thousands falling out of the ranks, frora hunger and fatigue. Grant seeing, as he says, that Lee's chance of escape was utterly hopeless, raaguanimously addressed him a note, sug gesting the hopelessness of further resistance, and stating that he felt it his duty to shift from himself the responsibility of further effusion of blood, by asking a surrender. Lee replied on the same day, the 7th, stating that he too desired to avoid useless effusion of blood, and asked what terms would be offered on condition of surrender. Grant replied, on the 8th, that, " Peace being ray great desire, there is but one condition I would insist upon, and that is the men and officers surrendered shall be disqualified for taking up arras against the Government of the United States until properly exchanged." The pursuit, however, was not relaxed. Early in the morning of the 8th, Meade followed Lee north of the Appo mattox, while the tireless Sheridan, with all the cavalry, pushed straight for Appomattox Station, followed by General Ord's command, aud the Fifth Corps. He reached there late in the evening, drove out the rebels, and captured twenty-five pieces of artillery, and four trains of cars loaded with supplies for Lee's army. The chase was up. At midnight Grant received frora Lee the following note :* « April 8, 1865. " G-ENERAL : I received at a late hour your note of to-day. In mine of yesterday I did not intend to propose the surrender of the army of Northern Virginia, hut to ask the terms of your proposition. To be » Grant's Report, p. 41. lee's SURRENDER. 635 frank, I do not think the emergency has arisen to call for the surrender of this army, but as the restoration of peace should he the sole object of all, I desired to know whether your proposals would lead to that end. I cannot, therefore, meet you with a view to surrender the army of Northern Viaginia, but as far as your proposal may affect the Con federate States forces under my command, and tend to the restoration of peace, I should be pleased to meet you at ten A. M. to-morrow, on the old stage road to Richmond, between the picket lines of the two armies. Lieutenant General U. S. Grant." " R. E. LEE, General. Its disingenuousness under the narae of " frankness," will not be seriously conderaned when the extremity to which he and his " lost cause" of slavery were reduced, are remem bered. He did not deceive Grant, but that comraander scorned to take, advantage of its dissiraulation to exact harder terms, but in accordance with his instructions from the Secretary of War, replied as follows : " April 9, 1865. " General : Tour note of yesterday is received. I have no au thority to treat on the subject of peace; the meeting proposed for ten A. M. to-day could lead to no good. I will state, however. General, that I am equally anxious for peace with yourself, and the whole North entertains the same feeling. The terms upon which peace can be had are well understood. By the South laying down their arms they will hasten that most desirable event, save thousands of human lives, and hundreds of millions of property not yet destroyed. Seriously hoping that all our difficulties may be settled without the loss of another life, I subscribe myself, &c., "U. S. GRANT, Lieutenant General. « General R. E. Lee." On the 9th the eneray raade a desperate attempt to break through the lines of Sheridan, but as the infantry of General Ord came into view, the utter hopelessness of the attempt was perceived, and a white flag was seht, asking a suspen sion of hostilities, pending a negotiation for a surrender. General Lee asked an interview in accordance with Grant's note, to arrange the terms of surrender. The interview was 636 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. held at Appomattox Court House, and the terms of surrender agreed upon in writing as follows : "= " Appomattox Court House, Va., April 9, 1865. " General : In accordance with the substance of my letter to you of the Sth instant, I propose to receive the surrender of the army of Northern Virginia on the following terms, to wit : Rolls of all the officers and men to be made in duplicate, one copy to be given to an officer to be designated by me, the other to be retained by such officer or officers as you may designate. The officers to give their individual paroles not to take up arms against the Government of the United States until properly exchanged ; and each company or regimental com mander sign a like parole for the men of their commands. The arms, artillery, and public property to be parked and stacked, and turned over to the officers appointed by me to receive them. This will not embrace the side-arms of the officers nor their private horses or bag gage. This done, each officer and man will be allowed to return to his home, not to be disturbed by United States authority so long as they observe their paroles and the laws in force where they may reside. " U. S. GRANT, Lieutenant General. " General R. E. Lee." " Headquarters Army of Northern Virginia, ) " April 9, 1865. I " General : I received your letter of this date, containing the terms of the surrender of the army of Northern Virginia, as proposed by you. As they are substantially the same as those expressed in your letter of the Sth instant, they are accepted. I will proceed to designate the proper officers to carry the stipulations into effect. " R. E. LEE, General. " Lieutenant General U. S. Grant." These terras were very liberal, raagnanimous, generous. Grant's conduct was in the highest degree delicate, towards an enemy, that certainly, as a soldier in the field, had earned his respect. The stipulation in the surrender, providing that " each officer and man will be allowed to return to his home, not to be disturbed by United States authority, so long as they ob serve their paroles, and the laws in force where they may * Grant's Report, p. 42. lee's SURRENDER. 637 reside," gave much dissatisfaction to the army, and to the country. There were many officers embraced in the surren der who had deserted their fiag to join in the rebellion ; some who had never gone through the form of resignation. The Union soldiers remembered that their comrades had been shot for desertion. General Picket, of the rebel array, had hung the Union men of North Carolina for that fidelity to their country, which he termed treason. He and his asso ciates were now perraitted to return home unpunished, un molested. Tet this dissatisfaction was in a measure lost in the universal joy and acclaraation which greeted the surren der of Lee. It was difficult to exact severe terras of men in the condition of the Confederates. With the heavy burden of slavery to fight for, their heroism and persistence could not fail to secure respect. Lee's position, with all his faults, was indeed pathetic, when he was seen taking his farewell, and saying to his gallant soldiers : " Men, we have fought through the war together, I have done the best I could for you." It was not in the heart of a generous foe to exact severe terms. His raisfortunes alraost disarmed justice. The meeting of the rank and file, as well as the officers of the two armies, after the surrender, was raost cordial. They had learned to respect each other as soldiers. They now fraternized like long separated and estranged brothers. The Confederates were without shoes — in rags and tatters — worn and exhausted vrith terrible raarches, constant fighting, hun gry, and utterly wretched. The Union soldiers grasped the hands of their late enemies, made them their guests, divided their rations, supplied them with clothing, and so far as pos sible relieved every want, and then even dirided with them the money in their possession, to enable thera to reach their horaes. At this tirae the Confederates appreciated, and were most grateful for the generosity with which, from the Lieutenant General down, they were treated. They would then have joyfully accepted from the Government any terms which left them their lives, and their reraaining property. The surrender of Lee was regarded by the other rebel coraraanders as fatal to the rebellion, and they rapidly followed his exaraple. 638 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. On the 5th of April, Grant directed Sherman to push for ward frora where he then was, and " let us see," said he, " if we cannot finish the job, with Lee's and Johnston's arraies. * * * Rebel arraies now are the only strategic points to strike at."'" On the receipt of this order Sherman moved against Johnston, who retreated rapidly through Raleigh. This, the capital of North Carolina, Sherman occupied on the 13th of April. On the following day, news of the surrender of Lee, reached General Sherraan at Sraith- field. On the 14th a correspondence was opened between Sherraan and Johnston, which resulted, on the 18th, in an agreeraent for the suspension of hostiUties, and a raeraoran- dura, for a basis of peace, subject to the approval of the President. That raeraorandura provided in substance : 1. That the contending armies should remain in statu quo until after forty-eight hours' notice should be given by either commanding general to the other. 2. The Confederate armies to be disbanded. " 3. The recognition by the Executive of the United States of the several State Governments on their officers and legislatures taking the oath prescribed by the Constitution of the United States, and where conflicting State Governments have resulted from the war, the legiti macy of all shall be sumbitted to the Supreme Court of the United States. " 4. The reestablishment of all Federal Courts in the several States, with powers as defined by the Constitution and laws of Congress. " 5. The people and inhabitants of all States to be guaranteed, as £ir as the Executive can, their political right and franchise, as well as their rights of person and property, as defined by the Constitution of the United States, and of States respectively. " 6. The executive authority of the Government of the United States not to disturb any of the people by reason of the late war so long as they live in peace and quiet, abstain from acts of armed hcstility, and obey laws in existence at any place of their residence. " 7. In general terms, war to cease, a general amnesty, so far as the executive power of the United States can command, or on condition of disbandment of the Confederate armies, and the distribution of arms • Grant's Report, p. 40. SHERMAN'S AGREEMENT WITH JOHNSTON DISAPPROVED. 639 ani resumption of peaceful pursuits by officers and men, as hitherto composing the said armies, not being fully empowered by our respec tive principals to fulfil these terms, we individually and officially pledge ourselves to promptly obtain necessary authority and to carry out the above programme. " W. T. SHERMAN, Major General, " Commanding the Army of the United States in North Carolina. "J. E. JOHNSTON, General, " Commanding Confederate States Army in North Carolina. This basis of agreeraent was proraptly repudiated by the President, every member of the Cabinet concurring. Indeed, the country was astounded, that General Sherman could have been induced to submit such propositions to the Presi dent for consideration. The Secretary of War, immediately sent to General Grant, the following statement and order : " War Department, Washington, April 21, 1865. " General : The memorandum or basis agreed upon between Gene ral Sherman and General Johnston, having been submitted to the Pres ident, they are disapproved. You will give notice of the disapproval to General Sherman, and direct him to resume hostilities at the earliest moment. " The instructions given to you by the late President, Abraham Lin coln, on the 3d of March, by my telegraph of that date addressed to you, express subtantially the views of President Andrew Johnson, and will be observed by General Sherman. A copy is herewith appended. " The President desires that you proceed immediately to the headquarters of General Sherman and direct operations against the enemy. Yours truly, " EDWIN, M. STANTON, Secretary of War. " To Lieutenant General Grant." The following is a copy of the President's instructions : " War Department, Washington, March 3, 1865. " To Lieutenant-General Grant : " The President directs me to say to you that he wishes you to have no conference with General Lee, unless it be for the capitulation of General Lee's army, or some minor and purely military matter. He wishes me to say that you are not to decide, discuss, or confer upon any political question. Such questions the President holds in his own 640 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. hands, and will submit them to no military conferences or conventions. Meantime you are to press to your utmost your military advantages. " EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War." The Secretary of War issued the following stateraent : " This proceeding of General Sherman was disapproved for the following, among other reasons : "1. It was an exercise of authority not vested in General Sherman, and on its face shows that both he and Johnston knew that he (Sherman) had no authority to enter into suoh arrangement. " 2. It was a practical acknowledgment of the Rebel Government. " 3. It undertook to reestablish the Rebel State Governments that had been overthrown at the sacrifice of many thousand loyal lives and an immense treasure, and placed arms and munitions of war in the hands of the rebels at their respective Capitals, which might' be used as soon as the armies of the United States were disbanded, and used to conquer and subdue the loyal States. " 4. By the restoration of the rebel authority in their respective States, they would be enabled to reestablish slavery. " 5. It might furnish a ground of responsibility by the Federal Gov ernment to pay the rebel debt, and certainly subjects loyal citizens of the Rebel States to the debt contracted by the rebels in the name of the State. " 6. It puts in dispute the existence of loyal State Governments and the new State of Western Virginia, which had been recognized by every department of the United States Government. " 7. It practically abolished the confiscation laws, and relieved rebels of every degree who had slaughtered our people, from all pains and penalties for their crimes. " 8. It gave terms that had been deliberately, repeatedly, and solemnly rejected by President Lincoln, and better terms than the rebels had ever asked in their most prosperous condition. " 9. It formed no basis of true and lasting peace, but relieved the rebels from the pressure of our victories, and left them in a condition to renew their effort to overthrow the United States Government, and subdue the loyal States, whenever their strength was recruited and an opportunity should offer." Sherman's career, up to the tirae of this negotiation with Johnston, had been illustrious. He had rendered such signal REBEL FORCES EVERYWHERE SURRENDER. ¦ 641 services to his country, he had added such honor to her arms, that he had earned the right to her most favorable construc tion to every act, and an indignant negative to any suggestion of improper motive. Stanton, in expressing the disapproval of the Executive to the terms extended to Johnston, was emphatic, and decided, but not more so than was the general judgment of the country. On the morning of the 24th, General Grant arrived at the camp of General Sherman, and communicated the disap proval of the President,- to the terms which had been agreed upon. Notice was imraediately given of the termination of the truce, and a deraand was made by Sherman, for the sur render by Johnston, of bis army on the same terms as were given to Lee. A meeting between Sherman and Johnston, was held on the 26th, which resulted in the surrender and disbandment of Johnston's- army upon substantially the terms given to Lee. The surrender of the other rebel forces quickly followed. General Howell Cobb surrendered to General Wilson, at Macon, Georgia, on the 20th of April. On the 14th of April, General Dick Taylor surrendered all the forces east of the Mississippi to General Canby. On the 26th of May, General Kirby Smith surrendered his entire command to General Canby. With this last surrender, there was left no organized rebel forces anywhere within the territory of the United States. On the llth of May, Jefferson Davis, flying in disguise towards the sea, was captured at Irwinsville, Georgia. The President, as has been stated, remained at City Point after the conference of the military leaders, to witness the execution of the plans then determined upon. As the oper ations against Lee's army progressed, he telegraphed to the Secretary of War, and through him to the exulting people of the loyal States, the joyous news ofthe briUiant successes of the army. On the morning of the 4th of April, the Union troops took possession of the burning Capital of the Confederacy, and extinguished the fire, caused by the reckless carelessness 41 642 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. of the rebels. Among the first to enter Richraond, were the colored troops of General Weitzel's coraraand. They marched into the city, singing their favorite song of " John Brown." With drums beating, flags waving, bands playing, the Union column passed up the streets, fianked with the raging fire, and then, stacking arms, they went to work with a will to save Richmond, from this conflagration. Fully one-third of this beautiful city was burned by a fire comraenced by the Confederates setting fire to tobacco warehouses. Government foundries, and other property to prevent its falling into the hands of the Union array. On the day of its capture, Pres ident Lincoln, with his youngest son, Adrairal Porter, and a few attendants, visited the city. His coming was unan nounced, and he walked, leading his little boy by the hand, frora the landing to the headquarters of General Weitzel, just vacated by Jefferson Davis The news of his arrival spread through the city, and imraediately the exulting ne groes from all quarters came running to see their deliverer. Their enthusiasm was uncontrollable. They danced, sung, shouted, cried with joy. Their delight Was mingled with gratitude; thanks to God, and to Lincoln, were mingled together in such a way as would have been deemed very irreverent, did not their earhestness, their sincerity, and their ignorance excuse thera. Mr. Lincoln held a brief reception at the General's headquarters ; drove about the city, and at 6 P. M., returned to City Point. On Thursday, he again visited Richmond, accompanied by Mrs. Lincoln, Vice President Johnson, and several Senators. On this occa sion he was visited by prominent citizens of Richmond, anxious to know what would be the policy of the Qc(N- ernment towards thera. Without coraraitting himself to anythiug specific, he easily satisfied thera that his course would be generous, forgiving, and raagnaniraous. In one of these interviews, I have reason to believe the President stated his views of the necessity of National Union substantially as set forth in his first Inaugural Address and more fully in his Message of December, 1862. It will be reraerabered that in that raessage, he said : " That portion of the earth's surface which is owned and inhabited by the THE UNITED STATES MUST CONSTITUTE ONE FAMILY. 643 people of the United States, is well adapted to be the home of one National family ; and it is not well adapted for two or more. 5))K Our fathers had organized this " national faraily " under the Constitution, and it became his especial duty, as Presi dent, to maintain and perpetuate it. This duty he had en deavored faithfully to discharge. The patriotism of the loyal people embraced every portion of the Republic. Their pride had long dwelt upon the idea of a vast Republic "whose dorainion shall be also frora the one sea to the other, and from the flood unto the world's end."t The loyal people had fought the war through, because they would not give up this idea. The vast extent of the country and its future greatness and glory had long been to him a source of national pride. Virginians raust learn to substitute in their affections the Nation for the State : they need not love Virginia less, but they must love the RepubUc more. The people have overcorae the rebellion, not only because it was their duty under the Constitution, but also because they wanted the aid of the insurgent States to enable them to realize their great destiny. The South is an essential part of, and must help to build up, the great Republic. In reply to a suggestion frora the Virginians, that it was difficult to love a country so vast, and that patriotisra was always strongest araong a people inhabiting a country with a small territory, as iUustrated by the Scotch and the Swiss, where every person identifies his own home with his country, and the difficulty of embracing in one's affections, a whole continent, the pride and glory of the Roraan citizen in the Roman Erapire was recaUed. But perhaps a better answer to this raay be found in Mr. Lincoln's raessage before referred to, in which he says, speaking of our whole country, "Its vast extent, and its variety of climate and productions, are of advantage, in this age, for one people, whatever they might have been in forraer ages. Steara, telegraphs, and inteUigence have brought these to be an advantageous com bination for one united people." The continent is "our * Annual Message of December, 1862., 1 72 Psalm, V. 8. 644 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. national homestead." This, in aU "its adaptations and apti tudes, demands union and abhors separation." Now that slavery is eradicated, we shall soon cease to quarrel, and become a homogeneous people. Virginia will again become a leading, possibly, the leading S^ate, and before twenty years, she will thank Mr. Lincoln for the Emancipation Proclamation. Mr. Lincoln returned to Washington on the 9th of April. He had scarcely reached the White House before the news of Lee's surrender reached him. No language can ade quately describe the patriotic joy and deep gratitude to Almighty God which filled the heart of the President and the people. All the usual manifestations of delight, illumi nations, processions, with banners and music were given; but beneath all these outward manifestations, there was a deep, solemn, religious feeling, that God had given us these great victories, and th&,t He had in His Providence a great future for our country. The last battle had been fought, the last victory won, the Union triumph was complete, the rebeUion utterly crushed, and slavery overthrown ; and now, though not in -order in point of time, let us, before dismissing from these pages the Grand Army of the Republic, anticipate that final review of the troops of Grant and Sherman before they, having fin ished their work, retired to their homes among the people. This review was an event full of moral sublimity. The bronzed and scarred veterans, who had survived the battle fields of four years of active war, the hardy frames of those who had marched and fought their way from New England, and tbe Northwest, to New Orleans and Charleston; those who had withstood and repelled the terrific charges of .the rebels at Gettysburg ; those who had fought beneath, and above the clouds at Lookout Mountain ; who had taken Vicksburg, Atlanta, New Orleans, Savannah, Mobile, Peters burg, and Richmond ; whose campaigns extended over half a continent ; the triumphal entry of these heroes into the National Capital of the Republic which they had saved and redeemed, was deeply impressive. Triumphal arches, gar lands, wreaths of flowers, evergreens, marked their pathway. REVIEW OF THE ARMIES. 645 President and Cabinet, Governors and Senators, ladies, children, citizens, all united to express the nation's gratitude to those by whose heroism it had been saved. But, there was one great shadow over the otherwise bril liant speetacle. Lincoln, their great hearted chief, he whora all loved fondly to call their " Father Abrahara ;" he whose heart had been ever with thera in the carap, and on the march, in the storm of battle, and in the hospital ; he had been murdered, stung to death, by the fang of the expiring serpent which these soldiers had crushed. There were many thousands of these gallant men in blue, as they filed past the White House, whose weather-beatfen faces were wet with tears of manly grief. How gladly, joyfully would they have given their lives to save his. And now these grand armies were disbanded, and hastened to the horaes which they had voluntarily left, to be wel comed by family and friends, and cheered and cherished for life by the thanks of a grateful people. CHAPTEE XXYIII. COST OP THE WAR — LINCOLN'S "POLICY," — HIS ASSASSINATION funeral— THE GRIEF OF THE PEOPLE. Number of troops furnished by the several States — Cost in men and money of the war — Colored troops — Lincoln's " POLICY " — His views of the powers of Congress over the REBELLIOUS STATES — No RIGHT TO VOTE IN THE ELECTORAL COL LEGE — Loyalty should be the basis of reconstruction — Lincoln's views of negro suffrage — Faith must be kept WITH the negro „ RACE — ^ThE ASSASSINATION — FunERAL — National grief. THE military power of the rebellion was now crushed. Looking over the Republic from North to South, from East to West, it is difficult to realize fully the iraraense cost of this slaveholders' war. A great price, a terrible retribu tion had been visited upon the people, for the existence of slavery. Perhaps it is not extravagant to say, in the lan guage of Mr. Lincoln's second inaugural, that " the war had continued, until all the wealth piled by the bondman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil had been sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash had been paid by another drawn with the sword." With the war, the cause of the war disappeared. Some few dry statistics and considerations, will aid in the realiza tion of the magnitude of the conflict. The population of the twenty-three loyal States, and which, duriug the war, con stituted the United States, was 22,046,472. This includes Mis souri, Kentucky, and Maryland, which furnished soldiers for the arraies on both sides, and which had a population of 646 COST OF THE WAR. 647 3,025,745 ; and, also, California and Oregon, on the Pacific, and so distant from the scene of confiict, that they contri buted comparatively few men, leaving a population from which the soldiers were raainly taken, at 18,588,268. The population of the eleven seceding States was 9,103,333. The war was raainly fought by Araerican citizens, although there were sorae German and Irish regiments, and many of Irish, German, Norwegian, and other nationaUties, in the ranks of the regiments raade up raainly of American birth. There was no large accession to the population by emigra tion during the war. The number of emigrants in 1860 was 153,000, and it decreased during the first two years of the war ; and the increase in 1863 and 1864 was to fill up the vacancies in the ranks of laborers. The emigrant was not enrolled, nor drafted into the railitary service. The whole nuraber of Union soldiers raustered into service during the war, was 2,690,401 — fourteen and a half per cent, of the whole population.* The number of deaths in battle, and * The following table shows the number of troops furnished by each State, as reported.to Congress by the War Department : Aggregate statea. Aggregate. redu'd to 3 yr*B Btan'd. Maine 71,745 56,595 New Hanipshlre 34,605 30,827 Vermont 35,256 29,052 Massachusetts 151,785 123844 Rhode Island 23,711 17,878 Connecticut 57,270 50,514 NewYorli 455,568 380,980 New Jersey 79,511 55,785 Pennsylvania 366,326 267,558 Delaware 13,651 10,303 Maryland 49,730 40,692 West Virginia 30,003 27,853 District of Columbia 16,872 11,606 Ohio 317,133 239,976 Indiana '. 195,147 152,283 Illinois 258,217 212,694 Michigan 90,119 80,865 Wisconsin 96,118 78,985 Minnesota f. 25,034 19,675 Iowa 75,860 68,182 Missouri , 108,773 86,192 Kentucky 78,540 70,348 20,097 18,654 Total 2,653,662 2,129,041 648 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. from wounds, was 96,089; frora disease, 184,331; total, 280,420, or about ten and a half per cent. This is accord- iii.g to the records of the War Departraent. The actual number is a little higher. Fifty-seven Generals died during the war; thirty-seven of thera in battle or frora wounds; twenty from disease. The cost of the war to the United States was $3,098,233,078. The States expended in bounties, &c., as -estimated by committee of Congress, $500,000,000, The call for troops made by the President in all amounted to 2,042,748, and the numbered obtained was 2,690,401. * The whole number of colored troops enlisted into the railitary service during the war, was 178,975, and the losses these troops sustained during that period by sickness, wounds, killed in battle, and other casualties incident to war, was 68,178. The aggregate of colored population in the United States in 1860, was 4,449,201, of which 3,950,531 were slaves, f Under all the circumstances, the colored race fiirnished a fair proportion of soldiers. It is certain, considering the desperate and despo'tic means resorted to by the Confederates to fiU up the armies of the rebellion, that a much larger proportion of the people were forced into the miUtary service, in the rebel, than in the loyal States. The number of rebel troops finally surren dered, was in round numbers, 175,000. The number of *The foUowing table shows the date of the Jseveral calls for troops by the Presi dent, the number required at each call, the period of service, and the number obtained. The table is compiled from data in the War Department : Date of Number Perloda of Numbers call. ^ called for. service. obtatned, April 16, 1861 75,000 3 mos 93,326 May and July, 1861 582,748 3 years 714,231 May and June, 1862 3 mos 15,007 July 2, 1862 300,000 3 years 431,958 August 4, 1862 300,000 9 mos 87,588 June 15, 1863 100,000 6 " 16,361 October 17, 1863 300,000 3 yearsi February 1, 1864 200,000 3 " J ^^'*^ March 14, 1864 200,000 3 " 284,021 April 23, 1864 85,000 100 days 83,652 July 18, 1864 500,000 l,2&3yrs 384,882 December 19, 1864 300,000 l,2&3yrs 204.568 Total 2,942,748 2,690,401 280,420 died in battle or hospital ; 22,281 officers resigned; privates not aUowed to resign. > tCensiis of 1860, p. 595. RESULTS OF THE WAR. 649 prisoners in the hands of the National authorities, during the last year of the war, was 98,802. These were all sent to their horaes by the United States. The theatre of war was in the rebellious States. Their cities were' besieged and captured ; their territory desolated, and their people suffered all the evils of war at their own homes. The heroism of the Confederates was worthy of men who fought for liberty instead of slavery. The defence of Richmond required four years of fighting, and in all 700,000 men, before it was captured. In what raodern war, has any fortress, city, or capital, made a defense more heroic, and persistent ? This gigantic contest has beeu carried through to final success by a people previously absorbed in trade, and agri culture, and charged to have been enervated by wealth and prosperity. The American people, great in the war, were greater in their forbearance in the hour of victory. The supremacy of the law, of the civil power, had never been disregarded. The Republic comes out of the confiict with no security of civil liberty encroached upon, none of the guaranties of Magna Charta, and the Constitution broken down. No military coraraander ever dreamed of sub verting the supreme civil authority. The greatest captain of the war, rebuked those who urged him to be a candidate for the Presidency against Lincoln. All, military men not less than civilians, have recognized in the law and the Con stitution, the sovereign of the Union. Even when the assas sin struck down the Chief Magistrate, and it was known that conspirators were at the capital, seeking to destroy the high officials, the raachinery of the Governraent went on without a jar ; the Constitution and the laws \pere still supreme. The people exhibited as much moderation and humanity, as courage and persistence. The hour of vic tory, under the inspiration of Lincoln, was not the hour of vengeance, but of forgiveness. The war carried on by the Republic against slavery and rebelUon, was a Christian war, conducted upon principles of Christian civilization. It is this combination of raartial and civic virtues, which inspire hopes that the people will be equal to the great duties 650 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF S^LAVERY. yet before them, and by the exhibition of which they have compeUed their recognition by the candid world, as one of the great peoples of modern times. And now carae the grave and difficult work of building up the shattered fragments of the RepubUc ; the broken columns of the temple raust be reconstructed, with their foundations resting firraly upon liberty. To this work of reconstruction Mr. Lincoln now addressed hiraself He was no theorist, but a practical statesman, looking ever to the wisest raeans, to secure the end. In justice to hira, it raust ever be borne in mind that he lived less than ten days after the surrender of Lee ; not long enough to construct a policy. Much has been said in regard to his views on this subject, by his suc cessor, and those who follow him. They have attempted to shield the " Johnson policy " so eraphatically conderaned by the loyal people of the United States, under the great narae of Lincoln. Let us see what are the facts. The efforts of Mr. Lincoln to restore certain rebellious States to their forraer relations to the Union, were raade in the midst of war, when he was seeking, by every possible means, to detach those States frora the rebellion, and was anxious to secure the raoral infiuence of the return to the Union of a former slaveholding and re bellious State, emancipated and loyal. He had not tirae before his death to develope any settled policy in regard to what securities and guarantees the safety of the Republic might require, before restoring to power, those who had sought its overthrow. Philosophers and thinkers had specu lated and written upon the subject, but Mr. Lincoln, as a statesraan, a man of affairs, had not committed himself, be cause the subject had but just come before hira as a practical question, at the tirae of his death. Yet it is interesting and instructive^to learn his views as far as developed^ and the indications of what_bj^ policy would have_been nad he Uved; and at the hazard of repetition, I will recall his acts and declarations heretofore mentioned in this volurae, and add such others as are within my knowledge, that the people may have before them the means of forming an intelligent judgraent on the subject. LINCOLN'S " POLICY." 651 It will be conceded, that emancipation, the freedom of the colored race, was an indispensable condition to any plan of reconstruction which he would countenance. This was de clared repeatedly iu his raessages, and in his instructions to Mr. Seward before the conference at Harapton Roads. Let us recall what he did and what he said, indicative of his opinions of the status or condition of the rebelUous States, the powers of the Executive and Congress over them, and the wisest means by which they could be restored to their former relations. Early in the conflict, he appointed Military or Provisional Governors over the rebellious States. In his first Annual Message of December, 1861, he recommended that Congess provide by law for the establishraent of courts " for the ad ministration of justice in all such parts of the insurgent States and Territories as may be under the control of the Governraent, whether by voluntary return to its allegiance and order, or by the power of our arras." * He said to Con gress, that he had been unwilling to go beyond the pressure of necessity in the unusual exercise of power, " but the powers of Congress, I suppose are adequate to the anomalous condition." He thus recommended Congress to legislate and make laws for the government of such portion of the insur gent States and Territories as raight be under the control of the Government. In his Proclamation offering amnesty on certain conditions, and suggesting the mode of organizing loyal State Governments in the insurgent States, where the rebel State and Confederate Governments de facto had been overthrown and expelled, dated Deceraber 8, 1863, he says : " It is suggested as not iraproper, that in constructing a loyal State Governraent in any State, the narae of the State, the boundary, the subdivision, the Constitution and the general code of laws, as before the rebellion, be raaintained, subject 'to necessary modifications," etc. f Referring in his Message to this recommendation, he says of it : " The suggestion, as to maintaining the poUtical frame work of the States, on what is called reconstruction, is made • See Message of December, 1861. t See Message and copy of Proclamation, December. 1863. 652 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. in the hope that it will do good, without danger of harra. It will save labor and avoid confusion." It will be observed that this suggestion in regard to the maintenence ofthe boundaries and names ofthe old States, is put exclusively upon the ground of convenience. As the hostile government was expelled by the military power frora the seceding and belligerent States, and the territory which had been in rebeUion was brought under National control, Mr. Lincoln, as President and Coramander-in-Chief, governed that territory. It has been seen that, as eariy as his first an nual Message, " unwilling to go beyond the pressure of neces sity, in the unusual exercise of power," he asked Congress to relieve him by passing laws establishing courts in such conquered territory. Immediately after the rebel power was subjugated and overthrown in any portion of the belligerent territory, Mr. Lincoln recognized it as his duty, as the Executive, to pre serve the peace, punish crime, prevent anarchy, and see that justice was done to all. This he did first through the mili tary power, then, he appointed Provisional Governors, who, as the Union sentiment developed itself, initiated proceedings to organize civil Government under the direction of the Ex ecutive, as in Tennessee, Arkansas, and Louisiana. The civil Government thus organized, was always treated by Mr. Lincoln as a permissive, subordinate Government, until it should be sanctioned by Congress. The rebel State Govern ments he regarded as public enemies to be overthrown, and an entirely new Governraent, Republican in form, was to be estabUshed in place of them. In initiatory steps to organize new, loyal, RepubUcan State Governments in place of those e:!jpelled and overthrown, he, as the Executive, prescribed the quaUfications of voters, and required, that all participating in the preliminary proceedings, should be loyal to the Union, and should support the acts of Congress, and the Preclaraa tion emancipating the slaves. Mr. Lincoln always treated these proceedings, as preliminary, and as requiring the action of Congress, before the new State Government would be entitled to resume its forraer relations, and be entitled to LINCOLN'S " POLICY." 653 representation in Congress and to vote in the electoral college. The evidence of this will be more fully presented here after. Without going more into detail, it may be asserted without fear of successful contradiction, that Mr. Lincoln, as President, treated the Confederates as public enemies ; that not only were all the acts ofthe Confederate Government so called, but thpse also of the State Governments of the States in rebellion, regarded and treated by him as void, and these organizations were to be subjugated and overthrown ; and the territory from which they were expelled by arms, was to be governed for the time being by martial law ; but he was always anxious to bring back such territory, freed from the curse of slavery, to its " proper practical relations to the Union." In a letter to General Banks in regard to Louisiana, the President said : " If Louisiana sends members to Congress, their admission to their seats will depend, as you know upon the respective Houses of Congress and not upon the Executive." In his Proclamation of July 8, 1864, Mr. Lincoln presented the bill which had passed Congress, and which for reasons therein stated he did not sign, " as a very proper plan (of re- constructioli,) for the loyal people of any State, choosing to adopt it," and announcing his intention under certain circumstances, to adopt and execute the plan therein set forth. * This bill, it will be remembered, was that of Henry Wintfer Davis, reported frora the Reconstruction Committee of the House, and the provisions of which have been heretofore given. Afte'V the conference at Hampton Roads, one of the rebel Commissioners, Mr. Hunter, formerly a Senator of the United States, and before the rebellion, a man of high personal character, in giring a semi-official statement of these nego tiations, said : " whenever we go into the Union as a con quered people, we give up ihe laws of the United States, and must take such as ihey choose io make for us, and we go in without repre sentation in making those laws : far Mr. Lincoln told us, told me, * Proclamation of July 8, 1884. 654 , LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. that while we could send Representatives to the Yankee Con gress, yet it rested with that Congress to say, whether they would receive thera or not." * The Confederates came under the National authority as a " conquered people," they submitted without terras, except as to the personal security of those who surrendered to Grant and Sherraan. This speech of Mr. Hunter establishes that they carae with knowledge that they raust take such laws' as the Government they had sought to overthrow should pre scribe ; and " that they must come in without Representation in making those laws;" and that Mr. Lincoln notified them that it would be for Congress to determine whether their Representatives would be received. This is in strict accord ance with the statements contained in Mr. Lincoln's carefully prepared speech, made on the evening ofthe llth of April, 1865. In that speech he said, alluding to his Annual Message of 1863 : " I distinctly protested that the Executive clairaed no right to say when or whether, raembers should be admitted to seats in Congress from such States." A member of the Cabi net, (understood to be Mr. Seward,) said, he " suggested that I should omit the protest against my own power in regard to the admission of members of Congress," but he would not, and did not omit it. These stateraents establish the fact, that in his judgraent, whether the people of a State which had been in rebeUion, were in a condition to be represented in Congress, and take part in the Governraent, and upon what terras they should be represented, was a question for the deterraination of Congress. Upon the vital- question, when States, whose people had been in rebellion, would be entitled to vote in the Electoral College, a right correlative with the right of representation in Congress, Mr. Lincoln was equally explicit. He said in a Message, dated February 8, 1865 : " The Joint Resolution declaring certain States not cntitied to representation in the Electoral College etc.," has been signed by the Executive. But he went on to say, that to the two Houses of Congress belonged exclusively the right " to exclude frora counting » The Speech of Mr. Hunter, making this report, wlU be found In Appleton's Encyclopedia for 1865, p. 191. Lincoln's "policy." 655" all electoral votes deeraed by them to be illegal." This reso lution has been set forth in these pages,.and it excluded from the Electoral College of 1864, the votes of the eleven States in rebeUion. Mr. Lincoln concurred with Congress, that they ought not to vote, for he signed the joint resolution, but he at the same time declared Congress to have exclusive jujdsdiction over the subject. * I will now proceed to exhibit Mr. Lincoln's views upon another most important practical question, in regard to re construction — namely, upon what basis should the recon structed States be built ? Should loyalty be the basis of reconstruction ? Should the foundation of the reconstructed States be the Union men, or the disloyal ? In all his eftbrts to reconstruct, Mr. Lincoln built upon the loyal Union men, excluding certain classes of disloyal both from voting and holding office. In his raessage of Deceraber, 1863, he says : " There must be a test, so as to build only frora the sound." He further says : " An atterapt to guarantee a revived State Government, constructed in whole, or in preponderating part from the very element, against whose hostiUty and violence it is to be protected, is simply absurd." f And so, in all his ¦ building, he made loyal men, union raen, the foundation of political power; pardoned rebels, and sincerely repentant rebels, who took the aranesty oath, might vote, none others. He appointed none but Union men to office. He took none of his prorisional Governors from the rebel ranks. No man * The following is the message referred to : "To the Honorable the Senate AND House of Representatives : The joint resolution entitled, ' Joint resolution declaring certain States not entitled to representation in the Electoral College,' has been signed by the Executive, in deference to the view of Congress implied in its passage and presentation to him. In his own view, however, the two Houses of Congress, convened under the twelfth article of the Constitution, have complete power to exclude from counting aU electoral votes deemed by them to be illegal ; and it is not competent for the Executive to defeat or obstruct that power by a veto, as would be the case if his action were at all essential in the matter. He dis- clajms all right of the Executive to Interfere In any way in the matter of can vassing or counting electoral votes ; and he also disclaims that, by signing said re solution, he has expressed any opinion on the recitals of the preamble, or any judgment of his own upon the subject of the resolution. "ABRAHAM LINCOLN. " Executive Mansion, February Sth, 1865." From the Cimgressloual Globe, Second Session, Thirty-eighth Congress, p. 711. t Message ot 1863. 656 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. ever received office frora him, who could not take the " Iron clad oath," He did not say: " Bebels must talce the back seais," but he placed loyal men in the front seats. Mr. Lincoln was all kindness, generosity, and magnan imity, to sincerely repentant rebels ; he harbored no thought of vengeance, but to the brave, persecuted, cruelly abused Union men of the rebellious States, his heart yearned with affection. Those who, in tiraes of trial, had stood firra, and maintained their integrity, , these were the men, to be en trusted with power, and clothed with authority in the rebel lious States. These were the men he ever sought for to fill all places of honor, emolument, and power. Such was the " reconstruction policy" of Abraham Lincoln. What were his views as to the position the loyal negro should occupy, in the reconstructed Republic ? He desired that "the intelUgent, and those who have fought gaUantly in our ranks of the colored men," should have the privilege of voting. ''= In his last speech, before quoted frora, made April 11, speaking of negro suffrage, he says : " I would myself pre fer that suffrage were now conferred upon the very intelli gent, and on those who served our cause as soldiers." The foUowiug extract frora a letter to General Wadsworth is in - harmony with the foregoing : " I cannot see if universal amnesty is granted, how, under the circumstances, I can avoid exacting in return, universal suftrage, or at least suffrage ou the basis of intelUgence aud military service." **<¦<¦ Regarding it a religious duty, as the nation's guar dian of these people who have so heroically vindicated their manhood on the battle-field, when in assisting to save the life of the Republic, they have demonstrated in blood their right to the ballot, which is but the humane protection of the flag they have so fearlessly defended." f * Letter to Governor Hahn, March 12, 1864. t The following is an extract from the Wadsworth letter. I have never seen the authenticity of this letter denied, and it bears internal evidence of being genuine : " New York, September 25. " The Southern Advocate, of September 12, publislies the following extracts from the late President Lincoln's letter to General Wadswoi-th, who fell at the battle of the Wilderness. The letter, which is of a private character, is to be sent to General Wadsworth's family. It shows that Mr. Lincoln, who desired the bestowal of the LINCOLN'S " POLICY." 657 There is further evidence that Mr. Lincoln, had he lived, would have endeavored to secure suffrage to colored men, at least to the intelUgent, and to those who had exposed their lives for their country by serving in the Union army. I venture to place on record the opinion, based in part upon evidence which I cannot now make public, that had he lived, Mr. Lincoln's policy would have embraced general, not universal amnesty and negro suffrage.* From this general amnesty he would, I believe, have excepted certain leaders of the rebellion whose condiict had been pecuUarly and flagrantly criminal, and " all who had been engaged in any way in raaltreating colored persons, or white persons in charge of such, otherwise than lawfully as prisoners of war."t elective franchise npon the blacks, was also at an early day in favor of granting universal amnesty. Mr. Lincoln says : " ' You desire to know, in the event of our complete success in the fleld, the same being followed by a loyal and cheerful submission on the part of the South, if universal amnesty should not be accompanied with universal suffrage. Now, since you know my private Inclinations as to what terms should be granted to the South, in the contingency mentioned, I will here add that, if our success should thus be realized, foUowed by such desired results, I cannot see, if universal amnesty is granted, how, under the circumstances, I can avoid exacting in return universal suffrage, or, at least, suffrage on the basis of intelligence and military service. How to better the condition of the colored race has long been a study which has attracted my serious and careful attention ; hence I think I am clear and de cided as to what course I shall pursue in the premises, regarding it as a religious duty, as the nation's guardian of these people who have so heroically vindicated their manhood on the battle fleld, where, in assisting to save the life of the Repub lic, they have demonstrated their right to the ballot, which is but the humane protection of the flag they have so fearlessly defended.' " « The following note from the Hon. Charles A. Dana, Assistant Secretary of War, during the last two vears of Mr. Lincoln's administration, will indicate a portion ' of the evidence on this subject ; " New Yore, November 13, 1868. " My Dear Sir : In a speech here before the election, I stated that at the time of Mr. Lincoln's death, a printed paper was under consideration in the Cabinet providing ways and means for restoring State Government in Virginia. In that paper it was stated that all loyal men, white or black, were to be called upon to vote in holding a state Convention, while all rebels were to be excluded. I said that I could not alfirra that Mr. Lincoln had definitively adopted that policy with respect to black suffrage, but that I knew his mind was tending to it, and that I was morally cer tain he would have finally adhered to it. After Mr. Johnson's accession, all the provisions of the paper were incorporated in the Presidential Proclamation respect ing the re-organlzation of State Governments, with the single exception of this one making aU loyal men voters, whether white or black. * * * « » " Yours, vei-y truly, " CHARLES A. DANA. "Hon. Isaac N. Arnold." fSee President Lincoln's Amnesty Proclamation of December 8, 1863. 42 658 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. There was no point in regard to which Mr. Lincoln was raore sensitive, nothing about which he was more deter mined than that the National faith, pledged to the negro, that his liberty, his person, and his property should be protected, should be scrupulously kept. Let us recall sorae of his words on this subject. When, as Coramander-in-Chief, he declared the slaves of the rebel States free, he accompanied the decree with the pledge " that the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain their freedom." In his Message of December 8, 1863, after referring to the Eraancipation Prec laraation, and the laws of Congress, giving freedom to colored persons, and authorizing their eraployraent as sol diers, he says : " These laws and proclaraations were enacted and put forth for the purpose of aiding in the suppression of the rebellion. To give thera their fuUest effect, there had to be a pledge for their raaintenance. In ray judgraent, they have aided, and will further aid the cause for which they were intended. To now abandon thera, would be not only to relinquish a lever of power, but would also be a cruel and astounding breach of faith." Therefore, he insisted that all re pentant rebels, before amnesty was extended to them, should swear to support these very laws and proclaraations ; aud he solemnly declared that he never would return to slavery any person who had been made free by that proclamation or by those laws. " Negroes," said he, in his letter to the lUinois Convention, "like other people, act upon motives. Why should they do anything for us, if we will do nothing for thera. If they stake their lives for us, they must be prompted by the strongest raotives, even by the promise of freedom. And the promise being raade, raust be kept." Mr. Lincoln was a man of great evenness of temper, rarely excited to anger; personal abuse and indignity did not disturb him but wrong, injustice, and bad faith raade him indignant. When, therefore, sorae one suggested to him that he raio-ht placate the rebel raasters and secure peace, by an abandon ment of the freedraen, he indignantly exclairaed, " Should I do so, I should deserve to be damned in time, and in eternity." LINCOLN'S " POLICY." 659 These declarations might be extended indefinitely. But there are enough ; the great heart of Lincoln was above the prejudice of color, and when he saw a black soldier, with a brave, loyal heart, raairaed, with an arra or a leg shot off in battle, his heart yearned towards him ali the more, be cause he was of a despised race. Had he lived, no rebel out rage would have been coramitted with impunity upon a Union soldier, however black his skin; no hurable school house for freedraen's children would have been burned by mobs of former slaveholders ; no churches where colored people asserabled to thank God for sending them their great Liberator, " Father Abraham," would have been burned by pardoned rebels. The army would have been used, if neces sary, for the protection of loyal men, without regard to color, and the Republic would have been made the loyal man's safe and secure " Castle." Such would have been " the policy " of Abraham Lincoln. Let those who havfe broken faith with the negro, and been treacherous to the loyal, never insult the memory of Lincoln, by endeavoring to screen such perfidy under his honored name. For the rest, we know how hard it was for him to punish, how ready to forgive, but there was one offense he never would forgive, the violation of the Nation's faith to the negro. As the fortunes of the Confederates becarae raore dark and gloomy, there were those among them disposed to resort to measures still more black and desperate. Indeed, after the Presidential election of 1864, at which the people had so emphatically declared their deterraination " to prosecute the war with the utraost possible vigor to the complete suppres sion of the rebellion," a reckless and fiendish desperation, on the part of the slaveholders, became raanifest. Dark and mysterious hints, and intiraations of scheraes, so infernal in their character as to be regarded as utterly incredible by the loyal people, were brought to light. The people of the United States have ever been esteemed a bold, manly race, scorning treachery, cruelty, and all the malignant practices of some of the more weak and cowardly races. There pre vaUed a general love of "fair play;" and arson, and assas sination were unknown in the Araerican history, and were 660 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. regarded as so antagonistic to American character, that nearly all refused to believe any citizen of the United States could be found, base enough to perpetrate these cowardly criraes. When, therefore, threats of the conflagration of cities, the spread of disease and pestilence by sending into crowded towns pestilential poison, and assassination, were heard, and conspiracies to effect these objects were discovered, the charges were repudiated as incredible ; and it was believed that no Araerican could be found sufficiently infernal to cora mit this class of criraes. But the result proved that those who thus reasoned, did not appreciate the deraoralization and degeneration produced by slavery. In the autumn of 1864, HoweU Cobb Kennedy, alias Robert C. Kennedy, and others, undertook, at the instance of the Confederates, to execute a plan of wholesale arson and murder, by setting fire to hotels and places of public resort, crowded with unsus pecting guests, including women and children, in the city of New York. A-man by the narae of Beall, holding a cora raission from the rebel authorities at Richmond, acting with others, officers of the army of the insurgents, was guilty of attempting to throw trains of cars, filled with peaceable citi zens, off the track. For these and other offenses, these raen were tried, found guilty, and sentenced to be hung.* A party, bearing commissions from the insurgent government, on the 12th of October, 1864, crept in disguise across the Canadian frontier, into the peaceful vUlage of St. Albans, in Vermont, robbed the banks and murdered sorae of the citizens. The raen guilty of these outrages were now to climaac their crimes, and to fix forever upon the "lost cause" of Slavery and RebelUon, the infamy of assassinating the purest, kindest, most forgiving ruler in all history; a magistrate, capable of the sublime, the Godlike prayer, if they had given hira time to pray, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do." It has already been stated that Mr. Lincoln returned from City Point to Washington, on the evening of the 9th of April. From this tirae untU the 14th were memorable days. *See Trial and Sentence of Beall and Kennedy. MoPherson's Pol. History pp. 652,553. LINCOLN'S LAST DAY. ' 661 The surrender of the rebel armies followed each other in rapid succession ; and the joy of the people was inexpressible. The whole country — every city, town, village, neighborhood, . — every house was gay with the Union flag, now worshiped by every loyal heart. Every house was illurainated, bells were rung, salutes fired, and every raanifestation of joy and gratitude to God. Mr. Lincoln was full of hope and happi ness. The clouds were everywhere breaking away, and four years of sunny peace and cornparative quiet, of happiness, of the consciousness of great dutiesi well and successfully discharged, were rising before hira. On the raorning of the 14th of April, his son Robert, just returned frora witnessing, as an aid on the staff of Gen. Grant, the surrender of Lee, breakfasted with the President. It was a happy hour the father thus passed with his son, listening to details of the event. After breakfast he spent nearly an hour with Speaker Colfax, conversing in regard to the future, and explaining how he hoped to heal the wounds of the war, and build up on a sure foundation the Great Republic. Then he received and exchanged congratulations with a party ofhis old Illinois fi'iends. Between 11 and 12 o'clock, tbere was a Cabinet meeting, attended by Gen. Grant, at which all reraarked the hopefuland joyous spirit of the President; and all bear testi mony, that in this hour of rictory, he had no thought of vengeance ; but his raind was dwelUng upon the best raeans of winning back to sincere loyalty, those who had been making war upon the country. After the Cabinet meeting, he drove out with Mrs. Lincoln, expressing a preference to ride without other company, evidently with a heart full of joy, wishing to comraune alone with her whose life had been made anxious by his great duties. He conversed now of happier days. Said he to Mrs. Lincoln, " We have had a hard time together since we carae to Washington, but now the war is over, and with God's blessing upon us, we raay hope for four years of happiness, and then we will go back to Illinois, and pass the remainder of our lives in peace.' In the early evening he had another interview with Col fax, and George Ashmun, who had presided at the Chicago Convention, which nominated him for the Presidency. In 662 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the midst of the rejoicings at the capital, it had been an nounced by the press, that the President and General Grant would attend Ford's Theatre that evening. General Grant had an engagement which prevented hira from attending, and Mr. Lincoln, although reluctant on that occasion to at tend, was persuaded to go, that the people raight not be dis appointed. Mr. Colfax walked frora the parlor to the door with the President, and at the door bade hira " Good-bye," declining his invitation to accorapany him to the theatre. Mr. Colfax says : * (I * * * jjy mind has since been tortured with regrets that 1 had not accompanied him. If the knife which the assassin had in tended for Grant had not been wasted, as it possibly wonld not have been, on one of so much less importance in our national affairs, per chance a sudden backward look at that eventful instant might have saved that life, so incalculably precious to wife and children and coun try ; or, failing in that, might have hindered or prevented the escape of his murderer. The willingness of any man to endanger his life for another's is so much doubted that I scarcely dare to say how willingly I would have risked my own to preserve his, of such priceless value to us all. But if you can realize that it is sweet to die for one's country, as so many scores of thousands, from every State and county and ham let have proved in the years that are past, you can imagine the conso lation there would he to any one, even in his expiring hours, to feel that he had saved the land from a funeral gloom which, but a few days ago, settled down upon it from ocean to ocean and from capitol to cahin, at the loss of one for whom even a hecatomb of victims could not atone." Mr. and Mrs. Lincoln and party reached the theatre at about nine o'clock, and found it crowded to its utmost capacity. He was received, as he always was, with th(5 raost enthusiastic greetings. In the raidst of the play, a pistol shot was heard, and a raan, with a bloody dagger in his hand, leaped from the President's box to the stage, exclaim ing : "Sic semper tyrannis"—" The South is avenged" — and then ran behind the scenes. The President had been shot • See his speech at Chicago, April 30, 1865. THE ASSASSINATION. 663 from behind, and the assassin had escaped. Major Rath- bone, whp had accorapanied the President, seized the assas sin as he rushed past him, but the murderer, cutting him severely in his arm with his dagger, broke from hira. The President fell forward as he was shot, into the arms of his wife, and on the arrival of the surgeons, it was found the ball had entered the brain, creating a mortal wound. He was insensible from the beginning, and lingering until a few minutes past seven, on the morning of the 15th, expired. The rebel leaders had used the hand of a miserable, half- crazed play-actor, by the narae of John Wilkes Booth, to assassinate the Chief Magistrate of the nation, which their swords could not overthrow. Booth did not live to betray the men who set him on ; had he lived, a man who could commit an act so cowardly, would have been likely to have betrayed his employers ; but the exulting words of the fiend, as jje leaped upon the stage, betrayed the source from which he derived his helUsh inspiration. Alas, that Virginia's proud old motto should have been thus desecrated ! On the sarae night the Secretary of State, who was con fined to his house by severe injuries, received, by being thrown from his carriage, was attacked in his bed, terribly cut, and stabbed, and his life was saved only by the heroic eftbrts of his sons and daughter, and an assistant nurse, whose name was Robinson. Mr. Frederick Seward, his son, in atterapting to prevent the entrance of the ruffian into his father's sick roora, was struck by a pistol on the head, and his skull fractured, and he rendered insensible. The assas sin of Mr. Seward was an accomplice of Booth, who went by the narae of Payne, but whose real narae was Powell ; and he had been a Confederate soldier. Booth, in atterapting to escape, was shot on the 21st of April, by a soldier naraed Boston Corbett. Sorae of his ac complices were arrested, tried, and hung. But all of these were but the wretched tools of the conspirators. It yet re mains uncertain whether the conspirators themselves will ever in this world be dragged to light and punishraent. Andrew Johnson, the Vice President, was inaugurated as President on the morning of Mr. Lincoln's death. After wards, and after investigation, he issued a proclamation, / 664 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. reciting that it appeared from evidence in the Bureau of Military Justice, that the murder of Abrahara Lincoln, and the atterapted assassination of Mr. Seward, had been proc ired by Jefferson Davis, and others ; and, in behalf of the Government, he offered one hundred thousand dollars reward for their capture. * Whether Jefferson Davis, and the other leading rebels named in the proclamation are really guilty, or whether, if guilty, there is sufficient evidence to establish that guilt, as no trial has yet been had, I will express no opinion. That his assassination was the subject of frequent reraark among the slaveholders and rebel leaders, is well known. Mr. Lincoln had often been threatened with assassination, and his friends had long felt great anxiety on the subject, but they were never able to induce him to take precautions. He walked to and frora the War, Navy, State, and Treasury Departraents at all hours, unattended; drove or rod© on •The foUowing Is a copy of the Proclamation : "BY THE PBESIDENT OE THE tTNITED STATES OP AMBBIOA! "A PROCLAMATION. " Whereas, It appears from evidence in the Bureau of MiUtary Justice that the atrocious murder of the late President, Abraham Lincoln, and the attempted as sassination of the Honorable WUliam H. Seward, Secretary of State, were incited, concerted, and procured by and between Jefferson Davis, late of Richmond, Vir ginia, aild Jacob Thompson, Clement C. Clay, Beverly Tucker, George N. Saunders, William C. Cleary, and other rebels and traitors against the Government of the United States, harbored in Canada : "Now, therefore, to the end that justice may be done, I, Andrew Johnson, Presi dent of the United States, do offer and promise for the arrest of said persons, or either of thum, wittiln the limits of the United States, so that they can be brought to trial, the following rewards : " One Hundred Thousand Dollars for the arrest of Jefferson Davis. " Twenty-five Thousand Dollars for the arrest of Clement C. Clay. " Twenty-five Thousand Dollars for the arrest of Jacob Thompson, late of Mis sissippi. " Twenty-five Thousand Dollars for the arrest of George N. Saunders. " Twenty-five Thousand DoUars for the arrest of Beverly Tucker. " Ten Thousand DoUars for the arrest of William C. Cleary, late clerk of dement C. Clay. " The Provost Marshal General of the United States is directed to cause a de scription of said persons, with notice of the above rewards, to be published. " In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be afiixed. " Done at the city of Washington, this second day of May, In the year of our . Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-five, and of the Independence ^ '¦' of the United States of America the eighty-fifth. " ANDREW JOHNSON. " By the President : " W. HUNTEB, Acting Seoretary qf^Me." THE ASSASSINATION. 665 horseback to his summer residence at the Soldiers' Home often at night and alone. Mr. Colfax, in the speech at Chicago, already quoted from, makes the following statement on this subject : " No one could ever convince the President that he was in danger of violent death. Judging others by himself, he could not realize that any one could seek his blood. Or he may have believed, as Napoleon wrote to Jerome, that no public man could effectually shield himself from the danger of assassination. Easier of access to the pubhc at large than had been any of his predecessors ; admitting his bitterest enemies to his reception-room alone ; restive under the cavalry escort which Secretary Stanton insisted should accompany him last summer in his daily journeys between the White House and his summer resi dence at the Soldiers' Home, several miles from "Washington, at a time, too, aa since ascertained in the details of this long-organized plot discovered since his death, when it was intended to gag and handcuff him and to carry him to the rebel capital as a hostage for their recogni tion ; sometimes escaping from their escort by anticipating their usual hour of attendance ; walking about the grounds unattended ; he could not be persuaded that he run any risk whatever. Being at City Point after the evacuation of Kichmond, he determined to go thither, not from idle curosity, but to see if he could not do something to stop the effusion of blood and hasten the peace for which he longed. The ever-watchful Secretary of War, hearing of it, implored him by tele graph not to go, and warned him that some lurking assassin might take his life. But armed with his good intentions — alas ! how feeble a shield they proved against the death-blow afterwards — he went, walk ing fearlessly and carelessly through the streets, met and conferred with a rebel leader who had remained there, and when he returned to City Point, telegraphed to his faithful friend and constitutional adviser, who till then had feared as we all did at that time for his life : " ' I received your despatch last night, went to Richmond this morn ing, and have just returned. "'ABRAHAM LINCOLN.' " When I told him, on that last night, how uneasy all had been at his going, he replied, pleasantly and with a smile, (I quote his exact words,) ' Why, if any one else had been President and gone to Rich mond, I would have been alarmed too ; but I was not scared about myself a bit.' " If any of you have ever been at Washington, you will remember the foot-path hned and embowered with trees leading from the back 666 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. door of the War Department to the White House. One night, and but recently too, when, in his anxiety for news from the army, he had been with the Secretary in the telegraph office of the Department, he was about starting home at a late hour by this short route, Mr. Stanton stopped him and said, ' You ought not to go that way; it is dangerous for you even in the daytime, but worse at night.' Mr. Lincoln re plied, ' I don't believe there's any danger there, day or night.' Mr. Stanton responded solemnly, ' Well, Mr. President, you shall not be killed returning that dark way from my Department while I am in it ; you must let me take you round by the avenue in my carriage.' And Mr. Lincoln, joking the Secretary on his imperious military orders and his needless alarm on his account, as he called it, entered his carriage and was driven by the well-lighted avenue to the White, House." The terrible news of the death of Lincoln, was on the morning of the 15th borne by telegraph to every portion of the Republic. Coraing, as it did, in the midst of universal joy, no language can picture the horror and the grief of the American people on its reception. A whole people were in tears. Persons who had not heard the news, coraing into crowded cities were struck with the strange aspect ofthe people. All business was suspended, gloom, sadness, grief, sat upon every face. Strangers who had never seen the good President, woraen, and children, and strong raen, wept. The fiag, which had everywhere, frora every spire and raast-head, roof, and tree, and public building, been fioating in glorious triumph, was now lowered ; as the hours of that dreary 15th of April passed on, the people, by a comraon impulse, each family by itself, commenced dressing their houses and the public buildings in mourning, and before night the whole nation was shrouded in black. There were no classes of people in the Republic whose grief was more demonstrative than that of the soldiers and the freedmen. The vast arraies, not yet disbanded, looked upon Lincoln as their father. They knew his heart had fol lowed thera in all their campaigns and marches and battles. Grief and vengeance filled their hearts. But the poor negroes everywhere wept and sobbed over a loss which they instinct ively felt was to thera irreparable. On the Sunday following THE FUNERAL OF LINCOLN. 667 hia death, the whole people gathered to their places of public worship and mingled their tears together over a bereavement which every one felt like the loss of a father or a brother. The remains of the President were taken to the White House. On the 17th, on Monday, a raeeting of the raerabers of Congress then in Washington, was held at the Capitol, to make arrangements for the funeral. This meeting named a committee of one meraber frora each State and Territory, and the whole Congressional delegation frora Illinois, as a Con gressional Committee, to attend the remains of Mr. Lincoln to their final resting place in Illinois. Senator Sumner and others desired that his body should be placed under the dome of the Capitol, at Washington. It was stated that a vault had been prepared there for the remains of General Washington, but had never been used, because the Wash ington family and Virginia desired that his body should remain in the family vault at Mt. Vernon. It was said it would be peculiarly appropriate for the remains of Lincoln to be deposited under the dome of the Capitol of the Repub lic he had saved and redeeraed. The faraily of Mr. Lincoln would, I have reason to believe, consented to this, but Gov ernor Oglesby, Senator Yates, and others frora Illinois, were very urgent that his reraains should be taken to his old horae at Springfield, and it was finally so decided. The funeral took place on Wednesday, the 19th. The serrices were held in the East Roora. It was a bright, genial day — typical of the kind and genial nature of him whom a nation was so deeply raourning. This was the third funeral which had taken place at the White House during its occupation by the faraily of Mr. Lincoln. First, that of Colonel Ellsworth, at which the President was araong the most grieved of the mourners, teen that of his son, Willie, and now the President hiraself. The funeral services were very soleran and touching. They were attended by Mr. Lincoln's successor, the Cabinet, the Chief Justice and his Associates, the Senators and Mem bers of Corigiess, General Grant and Admiral Farragut, and a long list of military and naval officers, the Diplomatic LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. Corps, the Governors of the States, a large body of clergy, and distinguished citizens from every portion of the Republic. After the cereraonies at the White House, the body was taken to the Capitol, and placed in the Rotunda, beneath the Statue of Liberty, and guarded by sad and weeping soldiers. The coffin was covered with a profusion of sweet spring flowers, the face was exposed to sight, and thousands carae to take a last look before the procession should start for its destination on the far-off prairies. His features were, as in life, gentle, placid and kind. They seeraed, even in death, to express the Godlike sentiraents he had uttered from the steps of the Capitol on the day of his inauguration. As they looked upon that face, all felt that the rebels had killed their best friend. While these rites were going on at the Capital, funeral services were had everywhere throughout the land. The whole Nation suspended business, and every tongue and every pen was speaking Of the Nation's loss, and of him of whom every heart was full. The remains of the President, and those of his beloved son, Willie Lincoln, were then taken to the depot, and placed in the funeral car, prepared to receive thera. Non-coinraissioned officers of the Veteran Reserve Corps were detailed, to act as a body-guard, to attend the reraains to their last resting place. It was arranged that Major Generals of the army should attend the body, and keep guard continually, so that at all times, during the journey, the coffin should be under their special guardianship. It was ordered that the body, with those who foUowed it, the guard and attendants, frora the Capital, to the old horae of the President at Springfield, Illinois, should take nearly the sarae route Mr. Lincoln had taken, when he came from Illinois to assume the Presidency, thus giving the people an opportunity to show their respect and reverence. The funeral procession left Washington on Friday, the 21st, and was to stop at Baltiraore, Harrisburg, Philadelphia, New York, Albany, Buffalo, Cleveland, Colurabus, Indianapolis, Chicago; thence to Springfield. Thus, traversing the States THE FUNERAL OP LINCOLN. 669 of Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois. And now this long pilgriraage of sorrow, traversing half the continent, began. The people of every State, city, town, and hamlet, came with uncovered heads, with streaming eyes, with their offerings of wreaths and flowers, to witness the passing train. It is impossible to describe the scenes. Minute guns, the tolling of bells, music, requiems, dirges, military and civic displays, draped flags,- black, covering every public building and private house, everywhere indi cated the pious desire of the people to do honor to the dead. Two thousand miles, along which every house was draped in black, and frora which, everywhere, hung the national colors in mourning. The funeral cereraonies at Baltiraore, were peculiarly irapressive. Nowhere were the manifestations of grief more universal ; but the sorrow of the negroes, who thronged the streets in thousands, and hung like a dark fringe upon the long procession, was especiaUy impressive. Their ooarse, homely features were convulsed with a grief which they could not control. Their emotional natures were excited by the scene, and by each other, until sobs and cries, and tears rolling down their black faces, told how deeply they felt their loss. As the train passed slowly through the city of York, Pennsylvania, it paused, and there came, with mournful music, a procession of young ladies with a wreath of flowers which was laid reverently upon the coffin, and then, with no words, but the eloquence of deep silence, the train passed slowly on; and thence on to Har risburg ; and thence to Philadelphia, where the remains were to lay in state in the old Independence Hall. A half mil lion of people were in the streets, to do honor to all that was left of him, who, in that same HaU four years before, had declared that he would sooner die, sooner be assassinated, than give up the principles of the Declaration of Independence. He had been assassinated because he would not give them up. All felt, when the reraains were placed in that historic Hall, surrounded by the memories of the great men of the past, whose portraits, from the walls, looked down upon the scene, that a peer of the best and greatest of the revoluntionary 670 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. worthies was now added to the list of those who had served the Republic. The floral decorations of the Hall were pecu liarly beautiful. An immense cross, terminated by an anchor, made of white camelias, stood at the head of the coffin ; circular wreaths, anchors, crosses, and pure white flowers, everywhere contrasted with evergreens. The head of the coffin was placed near the old bell, now broken and preserved as a relic, which rang out the joyous peal which announced the passage of the Declaration of Independence. There it stood, bearing, conspicuously, the words, "Proclaim liberty throughout the land to all ihe inhabitants thereof." Lincoln had done this. And, because he had thus proclaimed, the slaveholders had murdered him ! During Saturday night of the 22nd, and the Sunday follow ing, bands of music were stationed in the belfry of the Hall, and played solemn dirges and hyrans over the departed. The procession reached New York on the 24th, and re mained until Tuesday, the 25th. The whole city was draped in mourning; on the day of the procession, its great thorough fare, Broadway, was absolutely full, from the Battery to Central Park. Milesof flags hung out, all draped in black; each house hung with dark embleras frora roof to pavement; mottoes everywhere expressive of the most profound sorrow and rever ence. Among the incidents here, was the visit to the remains, by the venerable and now broken frame of the aged soldier, General Scott, who carae to look his last upon the features of the President whose first inauguration he had aided ta secure. As the train passed up along the banks of the Hudson towards Albany, through all the towns and villages of thia interesting region, every possible deraonstration of grief and respect was raanifested. In one of the towns near the High lands, a tableaux of touching beauty had been arranged. As the train slowly approached the place, just aa the sun was sinking behind the Catskills, it was discovered that thou sands of the country people had gathered around an open space, near the banks of the river. This space was carpeted and draped with fiags, and as the train carae still nearer, slow, sad, plaintive rausic was heard, and a beautiful lady, repre senting the Goddess of Liberty, was seen kneeling over the THE FUNERAL OF LINCOLN. 671 grave of Lincoln, holding the drooping flag draped with mourning. The funeral train passed slowly by, the band play ing a solemn dirge, the setting -sun breaking through gor geous clouds, Ut up the scene. It was a most impressive spectacle. Then on to Albany — thence through the great State of New York to Buffalo, and then again across Pennsylvania thence to Cleveland, Colurabus, and Indianapolis — and thence to lUinois, reaching Chicago on the first of May. Here every man had personally known Mr. Lincoln ; here he had tried his causes, here he had made his speeches to juries, and arguments to courts. Here everybody had heard his politi cal speeches, and here he had been nominated for the Pres idency. Here were his old neighbors and friends, and yet, mourning him deeply and heartily, as did all, it scarcely could surpass the grief which had been raanifested all the way frora the National Capital. The body was placed in the Rotunda of the Court House, and this edifice and every other public or private building in the city, were draped with flags, and with embleras of mourn ing. The Court House was decorated with wreaths of flow ers, and everywhere were mottoes, expressive of the univer sal grief and reverence. Over the north door of the Court House, was the motto, " The altar of freedom has bome no nobler sacrifice" Over the south door, " Illinois clasps to her bosom, her slain hut glorified son," The funeral train reached the Capital of Illinois on the 3d of May. The Romans were accustoraed to decree a triuraph to their returning heroes. What Roraan triumph can be compared to the return of the remains of Lincoln from Washington to Springfield? The body was taken to the State House, and the covering reraoved frora the face so that his old friends and neighbors might look once more upon the features of Lincoln. His remains had been so perfectly em balmed that the expression was still natural and life-like. Here was seen among others, that touching motto : " He left us bome up by our prayers, • He returns embalmed In our tears." 672 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. The corpse was taken to Oak Ridge Cemetery, and there, araong bis old friends and neighbors, his clients and constit uents, with the nation — the world — for his raourners, was he buried. The funeral oration was pronounced by Bishop Sirapson. The following extracts will indicate its tone and spirit : " Near the capital of this large and growing State of Illinois, in the midst of this beautiful grove, and at the open njouth of the vault which has just received the remains of our fallen chieftain, we gather to pay a tribute of respect and to drop the tears of sorrow around the ashes of the mighty dead. A little more than four years ago, he left his plain and quiet home in yonder city, receiving the parting words of the concourse of friends who in the midst of the dropping of the gentle shower gathered around him. ******* " Here are gathered around his tomb the representatives of the army and navy, senators, judges, governors, and officers of all the branches of the government. Here, too, are members of civic processions, with men and women from the humblest as well as the highest occupations. Here and there, too, are tears, as sincere and warm as any that drop, which come from the eyes of those whose kindred and whose race have been freed from their chains by him whom they mourn as their deliverer. More persons have gazed on the face of the departed than ever looked upon the face of any other departed man. More races have looked on the procession for sixteen hundred miles or more — by night and by day — by sunlight, dawn, twilight, and by torchlight, than ever before watched the progress of a procession. **'* * * * * * * * * * " If you ask me on what mental characteristic his greatness rested, I answer, on a quick and ready perception of facts ; on a memory unusu ally tenacious and retentive ; and on a logical turn of mind, which fol lowed sternly and unwaveringly every link in the chain of thought ou every subject which he was called to investigate. I think there have been minds more broad in their character, more comprehensive in their scope, but I doubt if ever there has been a man who could follow, step by step, with more logical power, the points he desired to illustrate. He gained this power by the close study of geometry, and by a deter mination to perceive the truth in all its relations and simplicity, and, when found, to utter it. *********** " But the great act of the mighty chieftain, on which his fa'ine shall rest long after his frame shall moulder away, is that of giving freedom BISHOP SIMPSON'S FUNERAL ORATION. 673 to a race. We have all been taught to revere the sacred characters. Among them, Moses stands preeminently high. He received the law from Grod, and his name is honored among the hosts of Heaven. Was not his greatest act the delivering of three millions of his kindred out of bondage ? Yet we may assert that Abraham Lincoln, by his proc lamation, liberated more enslaved people than ever Moses set free, and those not of his kindred or his race. Such a power, or such an opportunity, God has seldom given to man. ***** " As a ruler, I doubt if any President has ever shown such trust in Grod, or in public documents so frequently referred to Divine aid. Often did he remark to friends and to delegations, that his hope for our success rested in his conviction that God would bless our efforts, because we were trying to do right. To the address of a large religious body, he replied, ' Thanks be unto God, who, in our national trials, giveth us the churches.' To A minister who said he hoped the Lord was on our sicle, he replied that it gave him no concern whether the Lord was on our side or not, for, he added, ' I know the Lord is always on the side of right,' and, with deep feeling, added, ' But God is my witness that it is my constant anxiety and prayer that both myself and this nation should be on the Lord's side.' *********** " Chieftain ! farewell ! The nation mourns thee. Mothers shall teach thy name to their lisping children. The youth of our land shall emu late thy rirtues. Statesmen 'shall study thy record and learn lessons of wisdom. Mute though thy lips be, yet they still speak. Hushed is thy voice, but its echoes of liberty are ringing through the world, and the sons of bondage listen with joy. Prisoned thou art in death, and yet thou art marching abroad, and chains and manacles are bursting at thy touch. Thou didst fell not for thyself. The assassin had no hate for thee. Our hearts were aimed at, our national life was sought. We crown thee as our martyr — and humanity enthrones thee as her triumphant son. Hero, martyr, friend, farewell !" 43 OHAPTEE ,XXIX. ABRAHAM LINCOLN. THOSE who shall have read these pages thus far, have already obtained better means of forming a correct judg ment of Mr. Lincoln than from any atterapt at word paint ing. He was a man difficult to describ^ and one who can be best understood and appreciated as portrayed by his own speeches, writings and conduct. Physically, he was a tall, spare man, six feet and four inches in height. He stooped, leaning ibrward. as he walked. He was very athletic, with long, sinewy arms, large, bony hands, and of great physical power. Many anecdotes of his strength are given which show that it was equal to that of two or three ordinary raen. He lifted with ease five or six hundred pounds. His legs and arras were disproportionately long, as compared with his body ; and when he walked, he swung his arms to and fro more than most raen. When seated, he did not seera much taller than ordinary men. In his move ments, there was no grace, but an impression of awkward strength and vigor. He was naturally diffident, and even to the day of his death, when in crowds, and not speaking or acting, and conscious of being observed, he seemed to shrink with bashfulness. When he spoke, or listened, this appear ance left him, and he indicated no self-consciousness. His forehead was high, his hair very dark, nearly black, and rather stiff and coarse ; his eye-brows were heavy, his eyes dark-grey, very expressive and varied ; now sparkling with humor and fun, and then deeply sad and melancholy ; flash ing with indignation at injustice or wrong, and then kind, genial, droll, dreamy ; always changing with his moods. His nose was large, clearly defined ami well shaped ; cheek-bones 674 PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS. 675 high and projecting. His mouth firm. He was easily cari catured — but difficult to represent as he was in marble or on canvass. The best bust of him is that of Volk, which was modeled from life in May, 1860, while he was attending court at Chicago. Among the best portraits, in the judgraent of his faraily and intiraate friends, is that of Carpenter, in the picture of the Reading of the Proclamation of Emancipation before the Cabinet. He would be instantly recognized as belonging to that type of tall, thin, large boned men, produced in the northern por tion of the Valley of the Mississippi, and exhibiting its pecu liar characteristics in a most marked degree in IlUnois, Kentucky and Tennessee. In any crowd in the United States, he would have been readily pointed out as a Western man. His stature, figure, manner, voice and accent, indi cated that he was of the Northwest. His manners were always cordial, familiar, genial; always perfectly self-pos sessed, he raade everyone feel at horae, and no one ap proached hira without being irapressed with his kindly, frank nature, his clear, good sense, and his transparent truthfulness and integrity. There is raore or less of expression and character in handwriting. Lincoln's was plain, simple, clear, and legible, as that of Washington, but unlike that of Washington, it was without ornament. In endeavoring to state those qualities which gave him success and greatness, one of the most important, it seems to me, was a combination of a supreme love of truth, and a wonderful capacity to ascertain and find it. Mentally, he had a perfect eye for truth. His mental vision was clear and accurate : he saw things as they were. I mean that every thing presented to his mind for investigation, he saw divested of every extraneous circumstance, every coloring, association or accident which could mislead. This gave him at the bar a wonderful sagacity which seeraed almost instinctive, in sifting the true from the false, in ascertaining facts; and so it was in all things through life. He ever sought the real, the true, and the right. He was exact, carefully accurate in aU his statements. He analyzed well ; he saw and presented what lawyers cal. the very gist of every question, divested of 676 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. all unimportant or accidental relations, so that his statement was a demonstation. At the bar, his statement of Ms case, or of a question of law, waa so clear, that most persons were surprised that there should be any controversy about it. His reasoning powers were keen and logical, and moved forward to a demonstration with the precision of mathematics. What has been said implies that he possessed not only a sound judgment, which brought him to correct conclusions, but that he was able to present questions so as to bring others to the same result. * His memory was strong, ready, and tenacious. His read ing was liraited in extent, but his memory was so ready, and so retentive, that in history, poetry, and general literature, no one ever reraarked any deficiency. As an illustration of the power of his raemory, I recoUect to have once called at the White House, late in his Presidency, and introducing to him a Swede, and a Norwegian ; he immediately repeated a poera of eight or ten verses, describing Scandinavian scenery. and old Norse legends. In reply to the expression of their delight, he said, that he had read and adraired the poem several years before, and it had entirely gone from him, but seeing thera recalled it. The two books which he read most were the Bible and Shakespeare. With these he was very familiar, reading and studying thera habitually, and constantly. He had great fond ness for poetry, and eloquence, and his taste and judgraent in each was exquisite. Shakespeare was his favorite poet. Burns, stood next. Holmes' beautiful poem, " The Last Leaf," was with him a great favorite. The following-verse he regarded as equal to anything in the language ; " The mossy marbles rest On the Ups that he has pressed In their bloom. And the names he loved to hear, Have been carved for many a year. On the tomb." * He made a speech at a Burns' Festival, in which he spoke at length of Burns' poems; illustrating what he said by many * Carpenter's Six Months at the White House, p. 69. PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS. 677 qilotatioils, which was listened to with the greatest pleasure, but it was unfortunately never reported. He was extremely fond of ballads, and simple, sad, and plaintive music. He was a most admirable reader. He read and recited from the Bible and Shakespeare, with great simplicity, but remarkable expression and effect. Often when going to and from the army, on the steamers and in his carriage, he took a copy of Shakespeare with hiin, and not unfrequently read aloud to his associates. After conversing upon public affairs, he would take • up his Shakespeare, and addressing his com panions, remark, " What do you say now to a scene from Macbeth, or Hamlet," and then he would read aloud, scene after scene, never seeming to tire of th^ enjoyment. On the last Sunday of his Ufe, as he was coming up the Potomac, from his visit to City Point and Richraond, he read many extracts frora Shakspeare. Araong other things, he read, with an accent and feeling whicti no one who heard him will ever forget, extracts from Macbeth, and among others, the foUowing : * * " Duncan is in his grave ; After Ufe's fitful fever, he sleeps well. Treason has done his worst ; nor steel, nor poison, Malice domestic, foreign levy, nothing Can touch bim farther." After "treason" had "done his worst," the friends who heard hira on that occasion, reraerabered that he read that passage over twice, and with an absorbed and pecuUar raan ner. Did he feel a raysterious presentiraent of his approaching fete? His conversation was suggestive, original, instructive, a.nd playful; and by its genial huraor, fascinating and attractive beyond comparison. Mirthfulness and sadness, were strongly corabined in hira. His mirth was exuberant, it sparkled in jest, story, and anecdote; and the next moment those pecu- Uary sad, pathetic, melancholy eyes, showed a man " familiar with sorrow, and acquainted with grief" I have listened for hours at his table, and elsewhere, when he has been sur rounded by statesraen, raUitary leaders, and other great men of the Nation, and I but repeat the universaUy concurring 678 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. verdict of aU, in stating that as a conversationalist, he had no equal. One raight raeet in corapany with him, the most distinguished men, of various pursuits and professions, but after listening for two or three hours, on separating, it was what Lincoln said, that would be reraerabered. His ideas, and his illustrations were those that would not be forgotten. Men often called upon hira for the pleasure of listening to hira. I have heard the reply to an invitation to attend the theatre, " No, I am going up to the White House — I would rather hear Lincoln talk for half an hour, than attend the best theatre in the country." As a public speaker, without any attempt at oratorical dis play, I think he was the most eftective of any man of his day. When he spoke, every body listened. It was always obrious, before he corapleted two sentences, that he had soraething to say, and it was sure to be soraething original, soraething diff'erent frora anything any one had heard from others, or had read. He irapressed the hearer at once, as an earnest, sincere raan, who believed what he said. To-day, there are raore of the sayings of Lincoln, repeated by the people, more expressions, sentences, and extracts from his writings and speeches, farailiar as " household words," than frora those of any other Araerican. Next to the Bible, and Shakspeare, there is no other source so prolific of these faraiUar phrases and expressions as his writings and speeches. Soraebody has said, " I care not who makes the laws, if I may write the ballads of a nation." The words of Lincoln have done more in the last six years to raould and fashion the American character than those of any other raan, and their infiuence has been all for good; for truth, right, justice, and liberty. Great as has been Lincoln's ser vices to the people, as their President, I think his influence derived from his words and his example in moulding the future National character, in favor of justice, right, liberty, truth, and real, sincere, unostentatious reverence for God, is scarcely less important. The Republic of the future, the raatured National character, will be raore influenced by Abrahara Lincoln, than by any other raan. This is evidence of the greatness of the man, intellectually, and still more, PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS. 679 morally. In this power of irapressing hiraself upon the people, he contrasts with many other distinguished men in our history. A few quotations from Webster live in the every day language of the people. Little of Clay survives ; not much of Calhoun, and who can quote, off hand, two sentences from Douglas ? But you hear Lincoln's words, not only in every cabin and caucus, but at every school house, high school and college, and by every farraer, as he tells you story after story of Lincoln's, and all to the point, hitting the nail on the head every time, and driving home the arguraent. Mr. Lincoln was not a scholar, but where is there 'a speech raore exhaustive in argument than his Cooper Institute speech ? Where anything more full of pathos than his speech to his neigh bors at Springfield, when he bade thera farewell, on starting for the Capital ? Where anything more eloquent than his appeal for Peace and Union, in his first Inaugural Address, or than his defence of the Declaration of Independence in the Douglas debates ? Where is the equal ot his speech at Gettysburg ? Where is a more conclusive arguraent than in his letter to the Albany meeting, on arrests? What is better than his letter to the Illinois State Convention ; and that to Hodges of Kentucky, in explanation of his anti- slavery policy ? Where is there any thing equal in simple grandeur of thought, and sentiment, to his last Inaugural ? From all of these, and raany others, from his every day talks, are extracts on the tongues of the people, as familiar, and nearly as much reverenced, as texts from the Bible; and these are shaping the national character. "Though dead, he yet speaketh." As a public speaker, if exceUence is measured by effect, he had no superior. His manner was generally earnest, often playful ; sometimes, but this was rare, he was veheraent and irapassioned. There have been a few instances, at the bar and on the sturap, when, wrought up to indignation by some great personal wrong, or an aggravated case of fraud, or injustice, or when speaking of the fearful wrongs and injustice LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF (SLAVERY. - of slavery, he has spoken in a strain of impassioned vehemence . which carried everything before him. Generally, he addressed the reason and judgment, and the effect was lasting. He spoke exteraporaneously, but with more or less preparation. He had the faculty of repeating, without reading it, a discourse or speech whichhe had prepared and written out. His great speech, on opening the carapaign in Illinois, June, 1858, was carefuUy written out, but so natur ally spoken that few suspected thatit was not extemporaneous. In his style, manner of presenting facts, and way of putting things to the people, he was more like Franklin than any other American. His illustrations, by anecdote and story, were not unlike the author of Poor Richard. Another source of his great inteUectual power, was the thorough, exhaustive investigation he gave to every subject. Take, for illustration, his Cooper Institute speech. Hundreds of able and intelligent men have spoken on the same subject, as was treated by him in that speech, yet, they will all be forgotten and his wUl survive, because his is absolutely per fect — forthe purpose for which it was designed. Nothing can be added to it. Mr. Lincoln, however, required time, thoroughly to investi gate, before he came to his conclusions, and the movements of his mind were not rapid, but when he reached his conclu sions he believed in them, and adhered to thera with great firmness and tenacity. When called upon to decide quickly upon a new subject, or a new point, he often erred, and waa ever ready to change when satisfied he was wrong. It was the union, in Mr. Lincoln, of the capacity clearly to see the truth, and au innate love of truth, and justice, and right in his heart, that constituted his character, and made him so great. He never demoralized his intellectual or moral nature, either by doing wrong, that good might come, or by advocating error, because it was popular. Although, as a statesraan, erainently practical, and looking to the possible good of to-day, he ever kept in raind the absolute truth, and absolute right towards which he always aimed. PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS. 681 Mr. Lincoln was an unselfish raan. He never sought his own advanceraent at the expense of others. He was a just man. He never tried to pull others down, that he might rise. He disarmed rivalry and envy by his rare generosity. He was erainently a tender-hearted, kind and humane raan. These traits were illustrated all through his life. He loved to pardon ; he was averse to punish. It was difficult for him to deny the request of a child, a woman, or of any who were weak and suffering. Pages of incidents might be quoted, showing his ever thoughtful kindness, gratitudcj . and appreciation of the soldiers. The foUowing letter is Selected from many on this subject : " Executive Mansion, Washington, November 21, 1864. " Dear Madam : I have been shown in the files of the War De partment a statement of the Adjutant General of Massachusetts, that you are the mother of five sons who have died gloriously on the field of battle. I feel how weak and fruitless must be any words of mine which should attempt to beguile you from the grief of a loss so over whelming. But I cannot refrain from tendering to you the consolation that may be found in the thanks of the Republic they died to save. I pray that our Heavenly Father may assuage the anguish of your be reavement, and leave you only the cherished memory of the loved and lost, and the solemn pride that must be yours to have laid so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of freedom. " Yours, very sincerely and respectfully, "ABBAliAM LINCOLN. " To Mrs. Bixby, Boston, Massachusetts." One suraraer's day, in walking along the shaded path whicla,leads from the White House to the War Department, I saw-'the taU forra of the President seated on the grass under a tree, with a wounded soldier sitting by his side. He had a bundle of papers in his hand. The soldier had raet him in the path, and recognizing hira, had asked his aid. Mr. Lincoln sat down upon the grass, investigated the case, and sent the soldier away rejoicing. His charity, in the best sense of that word, was pervading. When others railed, he railed not again. No bitter words, no denunciation can be found in his writings or speeches. 682 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Literally in his heart there was " malice towards none, and charity for all." Mr. Lincoln was by nature a gentleman. No man can point, in all his life time, to anything mean, sraall, tricky, dishonest, or false ; on the contrary, he was ever open, manly, just, sincere, and true. That characteristic attributed to him by Mr. HoUand, in his raost excellent biography, of coarse story telling, and which he deeras it necessary to pal liate and apologise for, did not exist. I assert, that ray in- . tercourse with him was constant for many years before he went to Washington, and there I saw hira daily, during the greater part of his Presidency, and although his stories and anecdotes were racy, witty, and pointed, beyond all corapari son with others, yet I never heard one of a character to need palliation or excuse. * It raay interest the people who did not visit Washing ton during his Presidency, to know in what sort of a room Mr. Lincoln lived, and transacted business during his admin istration. His reception roora was on the second fioor, on the south side of the White House, and the second apart ment from the southeast corner. The corner room was oc cupied by Mr. Nicolay, his private secretary ; next to this was the President's reception room. It was a room perhaps thirty by twenty feet. In the middle, on the west side, was a large marble fire place, with old-fashioned brass andirons, and a large, high, brass fender. The windows looked to the south, upon the lawn and shrubbery on the south front of the White House, taking in the unfinished Washington * Mr. Carpenter, in his " Six months at the White House," aUuding to this mat ter, says : " It is but simple justice to his memory that I should state, that during the entire period of my stay in Washington, after witnessing his intercourse with nearly all classes of men, embracing governors, senators, members of Congress, officers of the army, and intimate friends, I cannot recollect to have heard him relate a circumstance to any one of them, which would ,have been out of place ut tered in a ladies' drawing-room. Aud this testimony is not unsupported by that of others, well entitled to consideration. Dr, Stone, his family physician, came lu one day to see my studies. Sitting in front of that of the President— with whom he did not sympathise politically— he remarked, with much feeling, 'It is the pro vince of a physician to probe deeply the Interior lives of men ; and I afllrm that Mr. Lincoln is the purest hearted man with whom I ever came in contact.' Secre tary Seward, who of the Cabinet officers was probably most Intimate with the President, expressed the same sentiment in still stronger language. He once said to the Rev. Dr. Bellows : ' Mr. Lincoln is the best man I ever knew !' " PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS. 683 Monument, the Potoraac, Alexandria, and down the beauti ful river towards Mount Vernon. Across the Potoraac was Arlington Heights. The view from these windows was altogether very beautiful. The furniture of this room consisted of a long oak table, covered with cloth, and oak chairs. This table stood in the centre of the roora, and was the table around which the Cabinet sat, at Cabinet raeetings, and is faithfuUy painted in Carpenter's picture of the Eraancipation Preclaraation. At the end of the table near the window was a large writing table, and desk, with pigeon holes, for papers such as are common in lawyers' officers. In front of this, in a large arm chair, Mr. Lincoln usually sat. Behind his chair, and against the west wall of the room, was another writing desk high enough to write upon when standing, and upon the top of this were a few books, consisting generaUy of the Statutes of the United States, a Bible, a copy of Shakespeare, and Whiting's War Powers. There was a sort of bureau, with wooden doors, with pigeon holes for papers, standing be tween the windows. Here the President kept such papers as he wished readUy to refer to. There were two plain sofas in the roora. Generally two or three raap frames, from which hung military raaps, on which the movements of the armies were continually traced and followed. The only pic ture in the roora was an old engraving of Jackson, which hung over the fire-place ; late iu his administration was added a fine photograph of John Bright. Two doors opened into this roora, one frora Mr. Nicolay's, the secretary, and the other from the great hall where the crowd usually waited. A bell cord hung within reach of his hand, while he sat at his desk. There was an ante-roora adjoining this, plainly furnished, but the crowd usually pressed to the hall, from which an entrance might be directly had to the Presi dent's room. A messenger stood at the door, and took in the cards and names of visitors. Here, in this room, raore plainly furnished than many law and business offices, plainer than the offices of the heads of Bureaus in the Executive Departments, Mr. Lincoln spent the days of his Presidency. Here he received everybody, 684 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. from the Lieutenant General and Chief Justice^ down to the private soldier, and humblest citizen. Custom had estab lished certain rules of precedence, fixing the order in which officials should be received. The members of the Cabinet, and the high officers of the army, were, of course, received always promptly. Senators and members of Congress, who are usually charged with the presentation of all petitions and recomraendations for appointments, and who are expected to right every wrong, and correct every evil each one of their respective constituents raay be suffering, or imagine himself to be suffering, have an immense amount of business with the Executive. I have often seen as many as ten or fifteen Senators, and twenty or thirty members of the House, in the hall, waiting their turn to see the President. They would go to the ante-room, or up to the hall, in front of the recep tion room, and await their turns. First, the Vice President, if present, and then the Speaker of the House, and then Senators and members of the House in the order of their arrival, and the presentation of their cards. Frequently Senators and members would go to the White House as early as eight or nine in the raorning to secure precedence, and an early interview. While they waited, the loud, ring ing laugh of Mr. Lincoln, in which he was sure to be joined by all inside, but which was rather provoking to those outside was often heard by the waiting and irapatient crowd. Here; frora early raorning to late at night, Mr. Lincoln sat, listened and decided; patient, just, considerate, hopeful. All the people came to him as to a father. He was more accessibld than any of the leading merabers of his Cabinet; rauch more so than Mr. Seward, shut up in the State Department, writing his volurainous dispatches ; far raore so than Mr. Stanton, indefatigable, stern, abrupt, but ever honest and faithful. Mr. Lincoln saw everybody ; governors, senators, congressmen, officers, ministers, bankers, all classes of peo ple ; all approached him with confidence, from the highest to the lowest ; but this incessant labor, and fearful responsi bility, told upon his vigorous frame. He left Illinois for the Capital, with a frarae of iron, and nerves of steel. His old friends, who knew hira in Illinois, as a man who knew not PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS^ 685 what illness was, who knew him ever genial and sparkling with fun, as fhe months ofthe war passed slowly on, saw the wrinkles on his forehead deepened into furrows; and the laugh of old days became, sometimes almost hollow ; it did not now always corae from the heart, as in former years ; anxiety, responsibiUty, care, thought, wore upon even his giant frame, and his nerves of steel became at times irritable. For more than four years, he had no respite, no holidays. When others fled away from' tbe dust and heat of the Capi tal, he must stay ; he would not leave the helm, until the danger was past. Mrs. Lincoln watched his care-worn face with the anxiety Qf an affectionate wife, and sometiraes took him from his labors almost in spite of himself; she urged him to ride, and to go to the theatre, to divert his mind from his engrossing cares. Let us for a moment try to appreciate the greatness of his work and his services. He was the Coraraander-in-Chief, during the war, of the largest army and navy in the world ; and this army and navy was created during his administra tion, and its officers were sought out and appointed by him. The operations of the treasury were vast beyond all previous conceptions of the ability of the country to sustain ; • and yet when he entered upon the Presidency, he found an empty treasury, no credit, no army, no navy, the officers all stran gers, many deserting, more in syrapathy with the rebels. Con gress divided, and public sentiment unformed. The party which elected him was in a minority. The old Democratic party, which had ruled the country for half a century, hostile ta him, and by long political association, in sympathy with the i^iflurgent States. His own party, new, made up of discord ant elements and not yet consolidated, unaccustomed to rule, and neither his party nor himself possessing any prestige. He entered the White House, the object of personal prejudice to a pajorityof the people, andof contempt to a powerful minority. And yet t am satisfied from the statement of the conversation of Mr. Lincoln with Mr. Bateman, quoted hereafter, and from Yiarious other reasons, that he hiraself more fully appreciated the terrible conflict before him than any man in the Nation, and LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. that even then he hoped and expected to be the Liberator of the slaves. He did not yet clearly perceive the manner in which it was to be done, but he believed it would be done, and that God wOuld guide him. In four years, this raan crushed the raost stupendous rebel lion, supported by arraies raore vast, and resources greater than ever before undertook to overthrow any Governraent. He held together against warring factions, his own great party ; and strengthened it by securing the confidence, and bringing to his aid a large proportion of all other parties. He was reelected alraost by acclaraation, and he led the peo ple, step by step, up to emancipation, and saw his work crowned by the Constitutional amendment, eradicating slavery forever from the Republic. Didthisman lack firraness? Study the boldness of the act of emancipation. See with what fidelity he stood by his proclamation. In his Message of 1863, he said, " I will never retract the proclamation, nor return to slavery any person made free by it." In 1864, he said, "if it should ever be made a duty of the Executive to return to slavery any person made free by the proclamation or the acts of Congress, sorae other person, not I, raust execute the law." When hints of peace were suggested, as obtainable by giving over the negro race again to bondage, he repelled it with indignation. When the rebel Vice President Stephens, at Fortress Monroe, terapted hira to give up the freedmen, and seek the glory of a foreign war, in which the Union and Confederate soldiers might join, neither party sacrificing its honor, he was inflexible ; he would die, sooner than break the faith pledged to the negro. Mr. Lincoln did not enter with reluctance upon the plan of emancipation, and in this statement I ara corroborated by Lovejoy, and Suraner, and raany others. If he did not act raore promptly, it was because he knew he must not go faster than the people. Men have questioned the firmness, boldness, and will of Mr. Lincoln. He had no vanity in the exhibition of power, but he quietly acted, when he felt it his duty so to do, with a boldness and firraness never surpassed. PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS. 687 Wliat bolder act than the surrender of Mason and Slidell, against the resolution of Congress, and alraost universal popular claraor, without consulting the Senate, or taking advice frora his Cabinet? The reraoval of McClellan, and Butler; the mbdificatipn of the orders of Freraont, and Hunter, were acts of a bold, decided character. Mr. Lincoln acted for hiraself, taking personally the responsibUity of deciding the great questions of his administration. He was the most democratic of all the Presidents. Per sonaUy, he was horaely, plain, without pretension, and with out ostentation. He believed in the people, and had faith in their good irapulses. He ever addressed himself to their reason, and not to their prejudices. His language was siraple, sometiraes quaint, never sacrificing expression to elegance. When he spoke to the people, it was as though he said to them, " come, let us reason together." There cannot be found in all his speeches, or writings, a single vulgar expression, nor an appeal to any low sentiraent or prejudice. He had nothing of the demagogue. He never himself aUuded to his humble origin except to express regret for the deficiencies of his education. He always treated the people in such a way, that they knew that he respected them, believed them honest, capable of judging correctly and disposed to do right. The following incident, related by Mr. Deming, Member of Congress from Connecticut, illustrates the religion which governed his daUy Ufe : On one occasion, Mr. Lincoln said, "I have never united myself to any church, because I found difficulty in giving ray assent, without raental reservation, to the long and complicated statements of Christian doctrine, which characterize their articles of belief and confessions of faith. When any church will inscribe over its altar, as its sole qualification for raerabership, the Saviour's condensed state ment of the substance of both law and gospel: 'Thou shalt love the Lord thy God, with all thy heart, with all thy soul, and with aU thy mind, and thy neighbor as thyself,' that church shaU I join with aU ray heart and soul."* One day, when one of his friends was denouncing his political enemies, "Hold on," said Mr. Lincoln, "Remember * See Demlng's Eulogy on Lincoln, p. 42. 688 * LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. what St. Paul says, ' and now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three ; but ihe greatest of these is charity.' " From the day of his learing Springfield to assume the duties of the Presidency, when he so impressively asked his friends and neighbors to invoke for him the guidance and wisdom of God, to the evening of Ms death, he seemed ever to live and act in the consciousness of his responsibility to that God, and with the trusting faith of a child, he leaned con fidingly upon His Alraighty Arra. He was risited during his administration by raany Christian delegations, represent ing the various reUgious denorainations of the Republic, and it is known that he was relieved and coraforted in his great work by the knowledge that the Christian world were pray ing for his success. Sorae one said to him, one day, " no man was ever so reraerabered in the prayers ofthe people, especially those who pray ' not to be heard of raen,' as you are." He replied, " I have been a good deal helped by just that thought." The support which Mr. Lincoln received during his ad rainistration from the religious organizations, and the sym pathy and confidence between the great bpdy of Christians and the President, was a source of iraraense strength and power to him. I know of nothing revealing more of the true character of Mr. Lincoln, his conscientiousness, his views of the slavery question, his sagacity and his full appreciation of the awful trial through which the country and he had to pass, than the following incident stated by Mr. Bateman, Superintendent of Public Instruction for Illinois. On one occasion, in the Auturan of 1860, after conversing with Mr. Bateman at sorae length, on the, to him, strange conduct of Christian raen and rainisters of the Gospel supporting slavery, he said : " ' I know there is a God, and that He hates injustice and slavery. I see the storm coming, and I know that His hand is in it. If He has a place and work for me — and I think He has — I believe I am ready. I am nothing, but Truth is everything. I know I am right, because I know that Liberty is right, for Christ teaches it, and Christ is God. I PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS. 689 have told them that a house divided against itself cannot stand ; and Christ and Eeason say the same ; and they will find it so. " ' Douglas don't care whether slavery is voted up or down, but God cares, and humanity cares, and I care ; and with God's help I shall not fail. I may not see the end ; but it will oome, and I shall be vindi cated ; and these men will find that they have not read their Bibles right.' " Much of this was uttered as if he was speaking to himself, and with a sad, earnest solemnity of manner impossible to be described. After a pause, he resumed : ' Does n't it appear strange that men can ignore the moral aspect of this contest ? A revelation could not make it plainer to me that slavery or the Government must be destroyed. The future would be something awful, as I look at it, but for this rock on which I stand, (alluding to the- Testament which he still held in his hand,) especially with the knowledge of how these ministers are going to vote. It seems aa if God had borne with this thing (slavery) until the very teachers of religion had come to defend it from the Bible, and to claim for it a divine character and sanction ; and now the cup of iniquity is full, and the vials of wrath will be poured out.' After this the conversation was continued for a long time. Everything he said was of a peculiarly deep, tender and religious tone, and all was tinged with a touching melancholy. He repeatedly referred tb his conviction that the day of wrath was at hand, and that he was to be an actor in the terrible struggle which would issue in the overthrow of slavery, though he might not live to see the end." The place Mr. Lincoln will occupy in history, will be higher than any which he held while living. His Eraanci pation Proclamation is the most iraportant historical event of the nineteenth century. Its infiuence will not be liraited by time, nor bounded by locality. It will ever be treated by the historian as one of the great land-raarks of human progress. He has been compared and contrasted with three great per- sonages in history, who were assassinated, — with Csesar, with WiUiam of Orange, and with Henry the IV. of France. He was a nobler type of man than either, as he was the product of a higher and more Christian civilization. The two men, whose preeminence in American history wiU not hereafter be questioned, are Washington and Lincoln. Tiincoln was as pure as Washington, as raodest, as just, as 44 690 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. patriotic ; less passionate by nature, more of a democrat, with raore faith in the people, and raore hopeful of the future. Washington will be the representative man of the era of Independe];ice ; and Lincoln, that of universal liberty. The cardinal ideas of Lincoln's policy, were national Unity and Liberty. That the portion of the earth called the United States should continue the home of one national family, recognizing the brotherhood of raan, was his grand aim. This great family, with a continent for a homestead, un iversal liberty, restrained and guided by intelUgence and Christianity, was his sublime ideal of the future. For this he lived, and for this he died. CHAPTEE XXX, the constitutional history of the war. The War Powers of the Government — The right to treat the Confederates as Public Enemies — The Habeas Corpus, who may suspend it — The Right to Emancipate Slaves in time op War — To estalish Military Governments over Rebellious and Belligerent Territory — The Legal Status op Rebellious States — Judicial Decisions — ^May Conditions BE Imposed upon Rebellious States, before being permitted to participate in the Government — And by what Power — Who must Determine whether a State Government is Republican in Form — What has been settled by the War. I PROPOSE in this, the concluding chapter, to give a history of the Constitution during the war. During the rebeUion, a great party condensed into a single, short sen tence its creed and its policy : "The Union as it was, and ihe Constitution as it is." To this it was replied, the America of the past is gone forever; a new nation has been born through the agony of the great ciril war. The theories and the institution which produced that war, have been over thrown, and their roots are being eradicated. Changes in the consfruction of the Constitution ; in the development of its long dormant and scarcely suspected war powers, andaraend- ments to the Constitution itself, have produced changes which alraost araount to a revolution. The attention of the people has,been so absorbed by the stirring scenes of the con flict, by the hopes which elated, and the fears which depressed them, that they have scarcely noticed, in the presence of these more stirring events, this revolution. A revolution as important in its results as the defeat of hostUe armies, or the overthrow of armed rebellion. Great civil wars have almost always produced great changes. 691 692 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. When they have secured liberty and justice; when they have exalted the sentiment of national honor; and when, in any large degree, they have promoted the public welfare, then the results which they have produced, are more import ant, raore paramount, more permanent, and more worthy of adrairation than the most renowned of victories. War, in itself, is but a record of suffering, heightened often, it is true, by the display of the highest rirtue and capacity, but chiefiy interesting from its results ; and as the means to accoraplish great ends. The raost valuable lessons in history are derived, not from mere military operations, but frora the conffict of the great ideas and principles which underlie all great wars. In the great and *sad tragedy of our civil war, crowded, as it has been, with scenes of the raost intense interest, nothing is raore iraportant than the great political revolution which it has accomplished. The two great ideas ' which the Union armies represented, were Nationality and Liberty. At the South, it was Slavery and the State. Na tional Unity and Universal Freedom have triumphed ; and, with their triumph, there has been a great change of opinion in respect to the war powers of the Governraent under the Constitution, including the powers of the President and Congress, on the subject of rebellion, slavery, treason, and war. The history of these changes, the Constitutional history of ihe war, is worthy of the profound study of all enlightened statesmen and thinkers, of all who trust in and admire, or who fear the progress of popular government. It is, doubtless, too early to write this part of the history of the great conflict. The atmosphere is not yet clear of the clouds of the contest, and the billows of contending opinion have not yet entirely subsided. I propose to note some of the changes, and thereby aid those who, in cooler and calmer days, shall make up the record. Let us go back, and see what was the condition of public opinion, which in our country raakes the law, preceding the war, on the subjects suggested, and corapare it with the present, and the great changes will be obvious and striking. The best evidence of public opinion upon the construction of the Constitution in regard to slavery. State rights, the PUBLIC opinion BEFORE THE WAR. 693 National Government, and the war powers under the Constitu tion, is to be found in the platforms of the great political parties, in the raessages and action of the Executive, and the action of the several departments of the Government, the speeches of leading statesraen, and resolutions of public meetings. The platform of the Republican party, on which President Lincoln was elected, contained this resolution : " Resolved, That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States ; and especially the right of each State to order and control its own do mestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is essential to the balance of power on which ther perfection and endurance ofour political fabric depend, and we denounce the lawless invasion by armed force of the soil of any State or Territory, no matter under what pretext, as among the gravest crimes." Democratic resolutions, beginning in 1840, and continuing to 1860, were repetitions of the following : " Resolved, That Congress has no power under the Constitution to interfere with or control the domestic institutions of the several States," etc. The ancient and long established doctrine of the Demo cratic party in relation to slavery was expressed in the Oincivr nati Platform in 1856, as follows: "That Congress has no pmeer under the Constitution to interfere with, or control ihe domestic institutions of the several States, and that all such States are the sole and proper judges of everything appertaining to their affairs not prohibited by the Constitution." The Attorney General of the United States, Judge Black, in an official opinion dated November 20, 1860, (being about two weeks after Mr. Lincoln's election, and presented to the Cabinet of President Buchanan,) declares in substance, that war raade by Congress upon a seceding State would dissolve the Union, and thus legaUze secession. His words are : " If it be true that war cannot be declared, nor a system of geheral hostilities carried on by the central Government against a State, (as he 694 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. had previously attempted to show,) then it seems to follow that an attempt to do so would be ipso facto an expulsion of such State from the Union; being treated as an alien and an enemy, she would be compelled to act accordingly. Arid if Congress shall break up the present Union by unconstitutionally putting strife and enmity between difi'erent sec tions of the country, instead of the domestic tranquility which the Constitution was meant to insure, will not all the States he absolved from their Federal obligations ? Is any portion of th^ people hound to contribute their money or their blood to carry on a contest like that P " President Buchanan, in his Message of December 3, 1860, says : " The question fairly stated is : Has the Constitution delegated to Congress the right to coerce a State into submission, which is attempt ing to withdraw, or has actually withdrawn from the Confederacy ? If answered in the affirmative it must be upon the principle that power has been conferred upon Congress to declare . or to make war upon a State. After much serious reflection, I have arrived at the conclusion that no such power has been delegated to Congress or to any other department of the Eederal Government. * sjj * * * Without descending to particulars, it may be safely asserted that the power to make war against a State is at variance with the whole spirit of the Constitution. * * * * Congress possesses many means of preserving it, (the Union,) by conciliation, but the sword was not placed in their hands to preserve it by force." It was resolved by Congress in 1861, by a nearly unani mous vote ; " That neither the Federal Governraent nor the people, or the Governments of -the non-slaveholding States have the right to legislate upon or interfere with slavery in any of the slaveholding States of the Union." On the 14th of January, 1861, Mr. Corwin, Chairman of a Select Committee of thirty-three, reported a series of prop ositions to the House of Representatives, the flrst of which was adopted in the forra of a Joint Resolution by a vote of 137 to 53, in the House, and was subsequently passed by the Senate, contained the following : " Resolved, That it is the duty of the Federal Government to enforce the Federal laws, protect the Federal property and preserve the Union of these States. PUBLIC OPINION BEFORE THE WAR. 695 " Reioh/ed, That we recognize slavery as now existing in fifteen of the United States by the usages and laws of those States, and we recog nize no authority legally or otherwise, outside of a State where it so exists, to interfere with slaves or slavery in such States, in disregard of the rights of their owners or the peace of society." The foUowing resolutions passed the United States House of Representatives, February llth, 1861, 116 yeas, 4 nays: " Resolved, That neither the Federal Government nor the people, nor Governments of the non-slaveholding States have a purpose or a Constitutional right to legislate upon or interfere with slavery in any of the States of the Union. " Resolved, That those persons in the North who do not subscribe to the foregoing propositions are too insignificant in numbers and influence to excite the serious attention or alarm of any portion of the people of the Republic ; and that the increase of their numbers and influence does not keep pace with the increase of the aggregate population of the Union." On the 28th of February, 1861, a Joint Resolution was passed, 133 to 65, providing for an araendraent of the Constitution, as follows : " Art. 12. No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which shall authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or to interfere within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State." Abraham Lincoln, in his Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861, says : " I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe Ihave no lawful right to do so, and I have no incUnation to do so." President Lincoln again says in his Inaugural Address of March 4th, 1861 : "I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution, which amendment, however, I have not seen, has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Gov ernment shall never interfere with ihe domestic institutions of ihe States including thai of persons held io service. To avoid mis construction of whatl have said, I depart frora ray purpose not to speak of particular araendraents so far as to say that, b% LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. holding such a provision now to be implied Constiiuiional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable." ' I have already in this volurae detailed the action of the miUtary leaders early in the war, in regard to slavery. They were very slow, as we have seen, to assert belligerent rights against the slaveholders. For a tirae they would not permit any interference with slaves or slavery; and the strange, almost incredible spectacle was presented, of the Nation's attempting to carry on war against the slaveholding Confed eracy, refusing to accept the loyal services of a very con siderable portion of the people of the Confederacy be-^ause they were black, and for a time, raany officers of the urray, not only refused to accept such service, but actually used the Federal army to return loyal men to the rebel authorities, to be used in strengthening the power of the insurgents. After actual war had been comraenced by the insurgents, after the Confederate Government had been established, Mr. Seward, Secretary of State, on the 10th of April, 1861, thus writes to Charles F. Adaras, our Minister to England : * " For these reasons he (the President) would not be disposed to re ject a cardinal dogma of theirs (the secessionists), namely : that the Federal Govemment could not reduce the seceding States to obedience hy conquest, even though he were disposed to question that proposition. But in fact the President wiUingly adopts it as true. Only an imperial or despotic Government could subjugate thoroughly disafiected and in surrectionary members of the State. This Federal Republican system is, of all forms of Government, the very one which is m^st unfitted for such a labor. Happily, however, this is only an imaginary defect. The system has within itself adequate, peaceful, and recuperative forces. Firmness on the part of the Government in maintaining and preserving the public institutions and property, and in executing the laws where amthority can he exercised without waging war, combined with such measures of justice, moderation and forbearance as will disarm reason ing opposition, will be sufficient to secure the public safety, until re turning reflection, concurring with the fearful experience of social evils, the inevitable fruits of faction, shall bring the recreant members cheer fuUy back into the family, which, after all, must prove their best and • Diplomatic Correspondence of 1S61. PUBUC OPINION BEFORE THE WAR. 697 happiest, as it undeniably is, their most natural home. The Constitu tion of the United States provides for that return, by authorizing Con gress, on application to be made by a certain majority of States, to assemble a National Gonventien, in which the organic law can, if need- fid, he revised so as to remove all real obstacles to a reunion so suitable to the habits of tbe people, and so eminently conducive to the common safety and welfare. Keeping that remedy steadily in view, the Presi dent, on one hand, will not sufier the Federal authority to fall into abeyance ; nor will he, on the other, aggravate existing evils by attempts at coercion, which must assume the form of direct war against any of the revolutionary States. If, while he is pursuing this course, com mended as it is by prudence and by patriotism, the scourge of civil war, for the first time in our history, must fall upon our country during the term of his administration, that calamity will then have come, through the agency, not of the Government, but of those who shall have chosen to be its armed, open, and irreconcilable enemies ; and he will not suffer himself to doubt that, when the value of the imperilled Union shall be brought in that fearful manner home to the business and bosoms of the American people, they will, with an unanimity that shall vindicate their wisdom and their virtue, rise up and save it." The Secretary of State writes to Mr. Adaras, February 17th, 1862, as foUows : " To proclaim the crusade (against slavery) is unnecessary ; and it wonld even be inexpedient, because it would deprive us of the needful and legitimate support of the friends of the Union who are opposed to slavery, but who prefer union with slavery, to disunion without slavery. Does France or does Great Britain want to see a social revolution here, with all its horrors, . hke the slave revolution in St. Domingo ? Are these powers sure that the country, or the world, is ripe for such a rev olution, so that it must certainly be successful? What if, in inau gurating such a revolution, slavery, protesting against ferocity and inhumanity, should prove the victor ? " * *It is a tact worthy of note, that Mr. Seward, earlylln 1862, deprecating emanci pation as " a crusade " against slavery, asks : " Does France or does Great Britain want to see a social revolution here, with all its horrors, Uke the slave revolution ol St. Domingo." Emancipation came, through President Lincoln, within less than a year from the date of Mr. Seward's letter, but to the credit of the long-abused negro race, let it he remembered, that it produced no " horrors," no outrages upon the part of the freedmen, upon their late masters. Mr. Lincoln, in proclaimmg emancipation, had enjoined "npon the people so declared free, to abstain from all violence (see p. 299) except in self-defense." This admonition of their benefac- tor they have scrupulously observed. Compare the conduct of the two classes, the 698 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Mr. Seward writes to Mr. Adaras, July 5th, 1862 : * " It is a satisfaction to know that a copy of my dispatch 260, has been received and read to Earl Kussell. The subject it presents is one of momentous import. It seems as if the extreme advocates of African slavery and its most vehement opponents were acting in concert together to precipitate a servile war — the former hy making the most desperate attempts to overthrow the Federal Union; the latter hy demanding an edict of universal emancipation as a lawful and necessary, if not, as they say, the only legitimate way of saving the Union." Mr. Seward, writing to Mr. Adams on a prerious occasion, " The rights ofthe States, and the condition of every human being in them, will remain precisely the same, whether the revolution shall succeed or whether it shall fail. In one case the States would be federally con nected with the new Confederacy ; in the other, they would, as now, be members of the United States, but their constitutions and laws, customs, habits and institutions in either case will remain the same." The People's Convention, which raet in Fanueil Hall, Bos ton, in October, 1862, and which contained araong its members, Joel Parker, Professor of Law at Cambridge, and B. F. Thoraas, an ex-judge of the Suprerae Court of Massachusetts, passed the following resolutions : " Resolved, That we deeply regret that the President of the United States at this time, forgetful of his obligations to the whole country as the constitutional head of the Govemment, and yielding to unwise coun sels, should have declared in his Proclamation of September 22d, 1862, his determination to adopt hereafter, in the prosecution of our deplo rable civil war, the policy of a party which the House of Eepresenta tives, by the resolutions of February llth, 1861, unanimously declared to be too insignificant in numbers and influence to excite the serious attention or alarm of any portion of the people of the Eepublic. " Resolved, That in the name of civihzed humanity, we respectfully hut earnestly protest against the Emancipation Proclamation of the freedmen aud their rebel masters, towards each other since the day of the eman cipation of the former; and which has been guilty of the most violence, the greater number of outrages, and "horrors'!" Let Memphis and New Orleans answer. ?Diplomatic Correspondence, Part 1, p. 124. By the time this dispatch reached Mr. Adams, Mr. Lincoln had written the Proclamation of Emancipation.^ THE RIGHT TO EMANCIPATE SLAVES DENIED. 699 President of the United States, both on the ground of its unconstitu tionality and inexpediency.'^ * In a publication issued in November, 1862, one of the ex- judges of the Suprerae Court of the United States, B. R. Curtis, denied that the President of the United States had the power, under the Constitution, to eraancipate the slaves in the rebellious States. He denied the right of the Com mander-in-Chief of. our army to raake railitary arrests, ex cept within the lines of his military operations in the field. He held that the local laws of the rebel States, which regu lated their domestic relations, were still valid as against the mUitary power of the United States, even after the inhabi tants of such States had become public enemies, and, there fore, that they were not superseded by the laws of war. He denied that offences not declared as such by statutes of the United States, could be lawfully punished in time of war by military or other tribunals, thus repudiating the operation of the laws of war in the insurgent States as applicable to a time of actual hostilities. He denied the right of the Presi dent to suspend the writ of Habeas Corpus, or to extend martial law over the country in time of war. The Monthly Law Reporter, the leading law journal of New England, pubUshed in June, 1862, an article denying the right of Congress to pass laws to conflscate the property, or to eraancipate the slaves of the pubUc eneray, (Vol. XXIV., No. vm.,) and asserted the doctrine that in the punishment of treason only, the life estate of the traitor could be taken from him. The article asserted "that when a Government is no longer able to protect its citizens, it has no right to demand that they should obey its laws." It took the ground that "Congress should not legislate, during the rebeUion, in such manner as to bind those persons who were within the district frora which our authority was excluded by the rebels." "The sound constitutional principle," says this learned journal, "which is the result of the authorities, seems to be this : where a usurping power has seized upon "^ese and similar resolutions, adopted by very worthy and ^^"^"^s^ed clU- zens, ought to silence those who charge Mr. Linpoln with bemg stow m Issuing the Emancipation Proclamation. 700 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the Governraent and excluded the rightful authority from the exercise of its functions, it raay claira the obedience of the district throughout which its power extends. If, in obe dience to the comraand of this power, the inhabitants take up arras against their lawful sovereign, they are not liable to the pains and penalties of treason. The power which actu ally governs raay be safely served in arms by those whom it protects." It also asserted that, unless in exceptional cases, it was settled law " that the private property of enemy's subjects upon land is not liable to seizure ; and that even the right of conquest includes the confiscation of the public prop erty only of the conquered State ; " and that there was no dis tinction to be taken between a rebellion and a public war in the application of this rule. " Hence it is apparent," says this journal, " that by the rules which govern the relations of belligerents to each other, the confiscation of the real property of the rebels is irapossible." The miUtary power to emancipate slaves was also denied. It seems to have been the deliberate opinion of President Buchanan, and of most of his original Cabinet, that while the States had no right to secede, yet it would be a violation of the Constitution to prevent secession by coercion. The advocates of extreme State rights, under the lead of Calhoun, had, in 1833, claimed the right of nullification, but this claim was so corapletely overthrown by Webster in his great speeches in reply to Hayne and Calhoun, and was so emphatically repudiated by President Jackson, Edward Livingston, atid the leading statesmen of that day, that it for a while had found little encourageraent.* As the Gov ernment had passed more and raore into the hands of slave holders, we have seen to what an alarraing extent it had been sanctioned throughout the country. *It is known that General Jackson always 'regretted that he did not cause the arrest, trial, and if convicted, execution of Calhoun. I have Information, upon which I am authorized to state that Henry Clay, who Introduced, and by his per sonal Influence and eloquence, carried through the Compromise Tariff of 1833, In after years expressed regret that he had done so. He expressed the opinion that It would have been better for the country, if the issue had been left to be decided be tween the National Government and the authorities of South Carolina^— between President Jackson aud Calhoun. This opinion of Mr. Clay, expressed some years before the slaveholders' rebellion, has often been repeated during the war— many believing that the conviction and sentence of Calhoun, as a traitor, might have saved the Republic from the late rebelUon. THE RIGHT TO SUBJUGATE STATES DENIED. 701 Even Mr. Seward had said " thai the Federal Govemment could not reduce ihe seceding States to obedience by conquest. That only an imperial or despotic government could subjugate thoroughly disaffected and insurrectionary members of the State. That the federal republican systera of ours is, of all forms of govern ment, the very one which is mosi unfitted for such a labor. That President Lincoln would not, on one hand, suffer the Federal authority to fall into abeyance, nor would he, on the other, aggravate existing evils by •atterapts at coercion which must assume the form of direct war against any of the revolutionary States." The prevalence of these opinions which extended to some of the officers of the army, and even to members of the Cabinet themselves, greatly embarrassed the Government in carrying on the war, and for a time irapaired materially its power. The right to emancipate the slaves of the enemy, to con fiseate his property, real and personal, to conderan rebels for freason for acts done under authority of the Rebel Govern ment, and the power of the Governraent, to enrol into its miUtary serrice all its citizens, on the ground that the claim of a rebel master to service could not stand in the way of the claim of the governraent to military service of all who could bear arras, were all denied, not only by the insurgents, but by their friends in the loyal States, and by a considerable number of persons whose opinions were raisled by the sophistry of the press in the interests of the rebellion. The Governraent was greatly erabarrassed at first by the claim set up by the rebels and their friends, that they were entitled to be treated as citizens. That although making war against the RepubUc, they were still citizens, and could be dealt with only according to the forras ofthe Constitution and laws as administered in time of peace. They themselves claimed to be under no restraints except those imposed by the laws of war, but the Government, they contended, raust take care not to violate the Constitution and the civil law. In reply, it was charged that the rebels were beUigerents, and the Government had the right to treat them as such ; not only as pubUc enemies, but as rebels— citizens violating the laws of their country. 702 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. Mr. Lincoln says, in his admirable reply to the Albany meeting : II «»******** Under cover of 'Uberty of speech,' 'liberty of thp press,' and ' habeas corpus,' they hoped to keep on foot amongst us a most efii cient corps of spies, informers, suppliers, and aiders and abettors of their cause in a thousand ways. They knew that in times suoh as they w6re inaugurating, by the Constitution itself, the ' habeas corpus ' might be suspended ; but they also knew tliey had friends who would make a question as to who was to suspend it ; meanwhile their spies and others might remain at large to help on their cause. Or if, as has happened, the Executive should suspend the writ, without ruinous waste of time, instances of arresting Innocent persons might occur, as are always likely to occur in such cases ; and then a clamor could be raised in regard to this, which might be, at least, of some service to the insurgent cause. It needed no very keen perception to discover this part of the enemy's programme ; so soon as by open ho.stiUties their machinery was fairly put in motion. *«*«***»" Mr. Lincoln soon discovered "the enemy's programrae," as he terraed it ; yet thoroughly irabued with a reverence for the guaranteed rights of indiriduals, he was slow to adopt the strong raeasures indispensable to public safety. The rights guaranteed by the Constitution to loyal citizens, such as freedom of the press, freedom of speech, the right of trial by jury, the right to bear arras, were all claimed by traitors in the North, even when used only to protect the notorious enemies of the Union in the execution of their treasonable plans. There was a period in the history of the rebellion, when, under the color of such claims, and in the absence of decisive measures on the part of the administrar tion, there was serious danger of a civil conflict in the loyal States. There was a time when treason and disloyalty, by means of secret societies, had spread to a dangerous extent over certain localities in the free States. There were locali ties in which the military authority of the Coramander-in- Chief was disregarded by local judges and civil State officers ; attempts were made to raise conflicts between the Federal military power and the State judiciary ; operations for raising volunteers and recruiting the array were baffled, or embar rassed by individuals and organized parties; the National credit was assailed and sought to be destroyed. But the strong good sense and sagacity of President Lincoln, careful and conservative as he was, were equal to the deraands of the crisis. The public raind was guided towards correct conclu sions, and aU the officers of the Government, aided by a THE WAR POWERS. 703 treatise upon the war powers of the President, and of Con gress, published in 1862, by William Whiting, Esq., of the Boston bar.* The author justified the action of the President, in the exercise of all the powers he had used, as entirely consistent with, nay, demanded by his Constitutional obligations. He advocated with ability the doctrine — then somewhat novel aud much disputed — that under the provisions of the Con stitution itself, the President and Congress were clothed with ample war powers against the inhabitants of the rebel lious States, and had the right to treat thera, in all respects, as public enemies, according to the laws of war ; while, at * Soon after the pubUcation of his book upon the war powers, Mr. Whiting waa requested by the Administration to come to Washington, and act as special coun sel and soUcitor of the War Department. No such office had at that time been established by law, but so many questions of extreme difficulty and delicacy were conUnually arising, and such was the confidence inspired by this book, that he was urged to accept this very responsible position. Mr. Whiting, with a patriotism and generous love of countiy, as rare as it was honorable, left a very large and very lucrative practice at the bar, and went to Washington, and entered upon the duties of his position, decUning to receive any compensation. He entered upon his duties as the law adviser of the War Department late in 1862. He soon acquired the perfect confldence and warm personal friendship of Mr. Lincoln, and the respect of his Cabinet. The office of Solicitor of the War Department was subse quently estabUshed by act of Congress, and Mr. Whiting was appointed to fill it, but, I beUeve, he decUned receiving any compensation, remaining at his post, a feithful, disinterested and most useful officer, down to the surrender of Lee, and the close of the war. During this period, the services of few men, under the Gov ernment, were more varied and responsible. He gave opinions, written and verbal, to the President ; he furnished written opinions to the Seoretary of War, and the heads of the Navy, and State Departments, in regard to questions arising out of the war, and the law of nations. At the same time, Mr. AVhitlng occupied a position towards Congress not unlike that of solicitor to the British Parliaraent. He was, as his writings abundantly indicate, an intelligent and radical abolitionist, besides being a very learned and accurate lawyer; aud he was in constant con sultation with the committees and individual members of both Houses of Congress, aiding by his counsel and advice and his professional knowledge in the important legislation of Congress. His opinions were constantly sought upon questions growing out of confiscation, slavery, arrests, and Involving international, belliger ent, maratime and martial law, and the local law of the States. He had tho pleasure to be with the army at the time of the assault and capture of Petersburg, and to enter the city of Richmond with President Lincoln after its surrender. The publications of Mr. Whiting, including the " War Powers," " Military Arrests," "Reconstruction," and " Military Government," were, as I think it will be con ceded, the most valuable and practicable works on the legal and constitutional questions growing out of the war, which have as yet been given to the public. ¦WhUe there are many whowUl dissent from some ofhis conclusions, all wiU admit the learning, integrity, and patriotism, which have inspired him in their production. Among those who faithfully, and unselfishly, with a supreme love of Uberty and of country, gave their services to the RepubUc during its days of trial, and who rendered valuable services, should be written the name of William Whiting. 704 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. the same tirae, the rebels could not, by rebellion, treason, and war, escape the penalties to which, as citizens, they were liable. Mr. Whiting says : * " War may be divided into two classes, foreign and civil. In aU civU wars the govemment claims the belligerents on both sides, as subjects, and has the legal right to treat the Insurgents both as subjects and as belligerents ; and they there fore may exercise the full and untrammelled powers of war against their subjects, or they may, in their discretion, relieve them from any of the pains and penalties attached to either of these characters. The right of a country to treat its rebellions citizens both as belligerents and as subjects has long been recognized in Europe, and by the Supreme Court of the United States. In the clvU war between St. Domingo and France, such rights were exercised, and were recognized as legitimate in Hose V. Himely, i Cranch, 272. So in Cherrol V. Foussatt, 3 Binuey, 252. " In Dobrie v. Napier, 3 Scott R. 225, it was held that ablockade of the coast of Por tugal, by the Queen of that country, was lawful, and a vessel was condemned as a lawful prize for running the blockade The cases of the Saniisima Trindad, 7, Wheat. 306, and United States v. Falmer, 3 W. 635, confirm this dOctrme. By the terms of the the constitution defining treason, a traitor Tnust be a subject and a belligerent, and none but a belligerent subject can be a traitor. " Having thus the fuUpowers and right of making and carrying on war against rebels, both as subjects and belligerents, this right frees the President and Congress fi'om the difficulties which might arise if rebels could be treated only as subjects, and if war could not be waged upon them. If conceding to rebels the privileges of belligerents, should relieve theni from some of the harsher penalties of treason, it will subject them to the liabilities of the belligerent character. The privileges and the disadvantages are correlative. But it is by no means conceded that the govemment may not exercise the right of treating the same rebels both as subjects and as belligerents. The constitution defines a rebel who commits treason as one who "levies war" ou the United States; and the laws punish this highest of crimes with death, thus expressly treating the same person as subject and beUigerent. Those who save their necks from the halter by claiming to be treated as prisoners of war, and so to protect themselves under the shield of belligerent rights, must bear the weight of that shield, and submit to the legal consequences of the charac ter they claim. They cannot sail under two flags at the same time. But a rebel does not cease to be a subject because he has turned traitor. The constitution expressly authorizes Congress to pass laws to punish traitor— that is, belUgerent —subjects ; and suppressing rebellion by armed force is making war. Therefore, the war powers of the government give full belligerent rights against rebels lu arms. " To deterraine what are the rights of different nations when making war upon each other, we look only to the law o'f nations. The peculiar forms or rights of tho subjects of one of these war-making parties under their own government, give them no rights over their enemy other than those which are sanctioned by inter national law. . In the great tribunal of nations, there is a ' higher law ' than that which has been framed by either one of them, however sacred to each its owu peculiar laws and constitution of goverfiment may be. " But whUe this supreme law is in full force, and is binding on aU countries, soften ing the asperities of war, and guarding the rights of neutrals. It is not conceded that the government of the Uuited States, in a civil war for the suppression of rebellion among its own citizens, is subject to the same limitations as though the rebels were a foreign nation, owing no aUegiance to the country." * War Powers, pp. M. THE WAR POWERS. 705 Having deraonstrated that the Governraent was clothed by the Constitution with the full powers of war, aud that the only liraitation of these powers were found in the law of nations, and not in the Constitution, the author of "The War Powers " proceeds to set forth several important prin- ples of belligerent law in accordance therewith, and to show that in this rebellion, the Adrainistration was justified in the employment of them all. He showed that the United States had the right to seize and confiscate all the property of the enemy on land and on the sea, including real as well as per sonal estate. That where property on land was captured from the enemy, capture itself passed the title to the captors, and no judicial proceeding was necessary ; but where a prize was captured on the sea, after our declaration of blockade, the decision of a prize court was necessary to confirm the title of the captors. That it .would depend upon the policy of the Govemment, whether belUgerent citizens should be allowed civil rights under the Constitution, inasmuch as "none of the rights guaranteed to peaceful citizens by the Constitution, belong to thera after they have becorae belUgerents against their own government." " Some persons," says Mr. Whiting, " have questioned whether title passes in this country by capture, or confiscation, by reason of some of the limiting clauses of the constitution ; and others have gone so far as to assert that all the proceed ings under martial law, such as capturing enemy's property. Imprisonment of spies and traitors, and seizures of articles contraband of war, and suspending the habeas corpus, are In violation of the constitution which declare that no man shall be deprived of Ufe, liberty, or property without due process of law ; ¦* that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.;t that un reasonable searches and seizures shall not be made ;J: that freedom of speech and of the press shall not be abridged ;J aud that the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. || " THESE PKOVISIONS NOT APPLICABLE TO A STATE OP WAE. "If these rules are appUcable to a state of war, then capture of property is illegal, and does not pass a title; no defensive war can be carried on; no rebellion can be suppressed ; no invasion can be repelled : the army of the United States, when called into the fleld, can do no act of hostility. Not a gun can be fired constitution ally, because it might deprive a rebel foe of bis life without due process of !««;— firing a gun not beiug deemed a ' due process of law.' " Sec. 4 of Art IV. says, that ' the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union arepubUcan form of govemment, and shaU protect each ofthem • Constitutional Amendments, Art. V. t Ibid, Art. V. X Ibid, Art. IV. § Ibid, Art. L J Ibid, Art. II. 45 706 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAERY. against Invasion, and, on application of the legislature, or of the Executive, when the legislature cannot be convened, against domestic violence.' " Art. I. Sec. 8, gives Congress power to declare war, raise and support armies, provide and maintain a navy ; to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrection, and repel invasion ; to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the mUitia, and for governing such part of them as may be In the service of the United States. "If these rules above cited have any application in time of war, the United States cannot protect each of the States from invasion by citizens of other States, nor against domestic violence ; nor can the army, militia, or navy be used for any of the purposes for which the constitution authorizes or requires their employ ment. If all men have the right to ' keep and bear arms,' what right has the army of the Union to take them away from the rebels 7 If ' no man can constitutionally he deprived of his life, liberty or property, without due process of law,' by what right does government seize and hang traitors? By what right does the army kill rebels in arms, or burn their mUitary stores? " TKUE APPLICATION OF THESE CONSTITUTIOlirAL GCAEANTEES. " The clauses which have been cited from the amendments to the constitution were intended as declarations of the rights of peaceful and loyal citizens, and safe guards iu the adminstration of justice by the civil tribunals; butit was necessary, in order to give the government the means of defending itself against domestic or foreign enemies, to maintain its authority and dignity and to enforce obedience to its laws, that it should have unlimited war powers ; audit must not be forgot ten that the same authority which provides those safeguards, and guarantees those rights also imposes upon the President and Congress the duty of so carrying on war, as of necessity to supersede and hold in temporary suspense sucli civil rights as may prove inconsistent with the complete and effectual exercise of such war powers, and of the beUigerent rights resulting from them. The rights of war and the rights of peace cannot co-exist. One must yield to the other. Martial law and civil law cannot operate at the same time and place upon the same subject matter. Hence the constitution is framed with full recognition of that fact; it protects the citizen in peace and in war; but his rights enjoyed under the constitution, in time of peace, are different from those to which he is entitled in time of war. " WHETHER BBLLieEKENTS SHALL BE ALLOWED CIVIL EIGHTS UN DEE THE CONSTI- TUTION DEPENDS UPON THE POLICY OP GOVERNMENT. "None ofthese rights, guaranteed to peaceful citizens by the constit^ution, belong to them after fliey have becoine belligerents against their own government. They thereby forfeit aU protection under that sacred charter which they have thus sought tooverthrow and destroy. One party to a contract cannot break it and at the same time hold the other to perform it. It is true that if the government elects to treat them as subjects and hold them liable only to penalties for violating statutes, it must concede to them all the legal rights and privileges which other citizens would have under similar accusations ; and Congress must be Umited to the provisions of the consti tution in legislation against them as citizens. But the fact that war is waged by these miscreants, releases the government from all obligation to make tliat conces sion, or to respect the rights of life, liberty, or property of the enemy, because the constitution makes it the duty of the President to prosecute war against theni In order to suppress rebellion and repel invasion. In addition to the right of confiscating enemy's property, a state of civil war confers upon the Government other not less important belligerent rights ; and among these rights is that of seizing and holding conquered territory by force, and of instituting and maintaining military Government over it, thereby suspending the ordinary civil administration. THE WAR POWERS. 707 This right was exercised by Mr. Lincoln from the beginning ?f the war, and was never very seriously questioned. On this point Mr. Whiting says : "Any section of this country, which, having joined in a general rebellion, shall have been subdued and conquered by the military fbrces of the Uuited States', may be subjected to military government, and the'rights of citizens in tiiose districts are subject to martial law, so long as the war lasts. Whatever of their rights of property are lost in and by the war, are lost forever. No citizen, whether loyal or rebel, is deprived of any right guaranteed to him in the Constitution by reason of his subjection to martial law, because martial law, when in force, is Constitutional law. The people of the United States, through their lawfully chosen Commander-in- Chief, have the constitutional right to seize and hold the territory of a belligerent enemy, and to govern it by martial law, thereby superseding the local government of the place, and all rights which rebels might have had as citizens of the United States, if they had not violated the laws of the land by making war upon the country. " By martial law, loyal citizens may be for a time debarred from enjoying the rights they would be entitled to in time of peace. Individual rights must always be held subject to the exigencies of National safety. " In war, when martial law is in force, the laws of war are the laws which the Constitution expressly authorizes and requires to be enforced. The Constitution, when it calls into action martial law, for the time changes civil rights, or rights which the citizen would be entitled to in peace, because the rights of persons in one of these cases are totaUy incompatible with the obligations of persons in the other. Peace and war cannot exist together ; the laws of peace and of war cannot operate together ; the rights and procedures of peaceful times are incompatible with those of war. It is an obvious but pernicious error to suppose that in a stcUe of war, the rules of martial law, and the consequent modification of the rights, duties, and obligations of citizens, private aud public, are not authorized strictly under the OonstUiiUon. And among these rights of martial law, none is more famil iar than that of seizing and establishing a military government over territory taken from the enemy ; and the duty of thus protecting such territory is impera tive, since the United States are obligated to guarantee to each State a republicail form of govemment. That form of government having been overthrown by force, the country must take such steps, military and civil, as may tend to restore It to the loyal citizens of that State, if there be any; and if there be no persons who WiU submit to the Constitution and laws of the United States, it is their duty to hold that State by military power, and under military rule, until loyal citizens ShaU appear there in sufficient numbers to entitle them to receive back into their own hands the local government." A still more severe rule of belligerent law is laid down in relation to enemy's property and enemy's slaves, and the right of seizure of all property situated in the enemy's country when necessary for military purposes, and there " are no limits to the war making power of the President, other than the law of Nations, and such rules as Congress may pass for their regulation." " Against aU persons in arms, and against aU property situated and seized in rebellious districts, the laws of war give the President full belligerent rights ; and when the army and navy are once lawfully caUed out, there are no lirniis to the war- maUng power ofthe President, other than (he law ofnaiixyns, and smih rules as Congress may pass for their regulation. 708 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. "'The Statute of 1807, chap. 39,' says a learned judge, 'provides that whenever ll Is lawful for the President to call forth the miUtla to suppress an insurrection, he may employ the land and naval forces for that purpose. The authority to use the army Is thus expressly conflrmed, but the manner in which they are to be used Is not prescribed. That is left to the discretion of the President, guided by the usages and principles of civilized war." The right of the President, as a question of law, to eraan cipate the slaves of any belUgerent portion of the United States, was a question of great interest early in the conflict; and was widely discussed by the press, and in Congress. Mr. Lincoln, as we have seen, early came to the conclusion, that as Commander-in-Chief, he possessed that right, and he exercised it. The argument upon the legality of such exercise is very clearly and ably stated by Mr. Whiting. He says : " The liberation of slaves is looked upon as a means of embarrassing or weaken ing the enemy, or of strengthening the military power of our army. If slaves be treated as contraband of war, on the ground that they may be used hy their mas ters to aid in prosecuting war, as employees upon military works, or as laborers furnishing by their industry the means of carrying on hostilities ; or if they be treated as, in law, belligerents, following the legal condition of their owners ; or if they be deemed loyal subjects having a just claim upon the government to bo released from their obligations to give aid and service to disloyal and belligerent masters, in order that they may be free to perform their higher duty of allegiance and loyalty to the United States; orif they be regarded as subjects ofthe United States, liable to do military duty ; or if they be made citizens of the United States, and soldiers ; or if the authority of the masters over their slaves is the means of aiding and comforting the enemy, or of throwing Impediments in the way of the Government, or depriving it of such aid and assistance in successful prosecution of the war, as slaves would and could afford, if released from the control of the enemy — or if releasing the slaves would embarrass the enemy, and make it more difficult for them to collect and maintain large armies ; in either of these cases, the taking away of these slaves from the ' aid and service ' of the enemy, and put ting them to the aid and service of the United States, is justifiable as an act of war. The ordinary way of depriving the enemy of slaves is by declaring emancipation." As Mr. Lincoln himself held, it belongs exclusively to the President to judge when the exigency arises in which he has authority to emancipate slaves : " The Constitution confers on the Executive, when in actual war, full belligerent powers. The emancipation of enemy's slaves is a belligerent right. It belongs exclusively to the President, as Commander-in-Chief, to judge whether he shall exercise his belligerent right to emancipate slaves in those parts of the country which are in rebellion. If exercised in fact, and while the war lasts, his act of emancipation is conclusive and binding forever on aU the departments of Government, and on all persons whatsover. " IS LIBEKATION OF ENEMY'S SLAVES A EEILIGEEENT EIGHT 7 "This is the chief inquiry on this branch of the subject. To answer it we must appeal to the law of nations, and learn whether there Is any commanding authority which forbids the use of an engine so powerful and so formidable— an engine EMANCIPATION AS A WAR MEASURE. 709 which may grind to powder the dlsloylaty of rebels In arms, while It clears the avenue to freedom for four millions of Americans. It is only the law of nations that can decide this question, because the Constitution, having given authority to Government to make war, has placed no limit whatever to the war powers. There Is, therefore, no legal control over the war powers except the law of nations, and no moral control except the usage of modern «i?vilized belligerents. " It is In accordance with the law of nations and witli the practice of civiUzed belligerents In modern times, to Uberate enemy's slaves In time of war by military power." ,., !SithQugh the validity of the Preclaraation of Eraancipa. tion, in consequence of the constitutional araendraent, has ceased to be a question of so rauch practical importance, yet a subject of such vast magnitude will always possess great historic interest. The Proclamation raay be defended both as the exercise of a belligerent right, and also as the exercise of a power conferred upon the President, as Coraraander-in- Chief, by the Constitution. It is clearly in accordance with the practice of cirilized nations in modern times, and the law of nations, to liberate slaves of the enemy in times of war. In our own revolution, this power was exercised by England, by at least three of her railitary coraraanders : Sir Henry Clinton, Lord Dunraore, and Lord CornwaUis. General Washington, in speaking of Lord Bunraore's ap peal to the slaves, says : " His strength will increase as a snow-ball by rolling, faster and faster, if sorae expedient be not hit upon to convince the slaves and servants of the - impotency of his designs." Mr. Jefterson, in his letter to Dr. Gordon, concedes the right of Great Britain to call the slaves of the Colonists td their aid, as a war measure. After speaking of the injury done by Cornwallis to his estates, to his crops, his barns, his stock of cattle, sheep, etc., he says he carried off all the horses capable of service, and he adds : " He carried off also about thirty slaves. Had this been done to give them freedom, he would have done right. * * * From an estimate made at the time, on the best information I could collect, I suppose the State of Virginia lost, under Lord CornwaUis' hands, that year, about thirty thousand slaves." Great Britain exercised the same right, in the war of 1812, against the United States. Her naval and military 'Whiting's War Powers, pp. 50, 60, 69. 710 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. commanders invited, by J)roclamation, the slaves to join the British forces, promising them freedora. The slaves who joined thera were liberated, and were carried away frora the country, contrary to the express terras of the treaty of Ghent. But England preferred to take the responsibiUty of violating the treaty, rather than to break faith with the ne groes. The United States demanded indemnity for the vio lation of the treaty. This question was referred to the arbitrament of the Emperor of Russia. He decided that indemnity should be paid, not because England had violated the laws of nations in emancipating the slaves, but because she had violated the terms of the treaty.* In the argument submitted to the Emperor, as the referee. Great Britain assumed the ground that, in war, either party had the right to Uberate the slaves of the enemy. Mr. Mid dleton, our Minister, was instructed by John Quincy Adams, Secretary of State, to deny that right, but Mr. Adams has placed on record the fact that he did so, in obedience to the instructions of the President, and against his own opinion. Great Britain asserted the right to liberate enemies' slaves, as a legitimate mode of carrying on war ; a right which she had exercised against her Colonies, which had been used by France agaiust her, and again by her against the United States. Ill 1793, St. Domingo was a colony of France, with a population of raore than half a raillion of negroes. Intes tine war had been carried on for raore than three years be tween the whites and raulattoes. The slaves had revolted in 1791. The Spaniards formed an alliance with the revolted slaves, invaded the Island, and occupied a portion of it. England was making a treaty with the planters, preparatory to an invasion of the Island. St. Domingo seemed about to be wrested from France. Her force there was feeble. Un der these circumstances, the French authorities, in August, 1793, issued a proclamation, under martial law, declaring all the slaves free, and thereby brought them tb the support of "¦ The Emperor " declined to award indemnification for slaves which the British forces carried from other parties not stipulated to be returned." See Wheaton's International Law, edited by Dana, note pp. 440-441. EMANCIPATION IN TIME OF WAR. ' 711 the Government. France recognized the act of the com missioners, and confirmed it, thus recognizing the right un der martial law to eraancipate the slaves of an enemy. This right has been exercised by several of the South American Republics — by General Morillo, and by Bolivar. " Slavery was abolished in Columbia," says John Quincy Adams, " by virtue of a military command, given at the head of the army, and its abolition continues to this day." The United States have recognized the right of its railitary officers in time of war, to appropriate to the public service the slaves of loyal citizens without compensation therefor : " ' In December, 1814,' says a distinguished writer and speaker, ' General Jack son Impressed a large number of slaves at and near New Orleans, and set them at work erecting defences, behind which his troops won such glory on the Sth of Jan- nary, 1815. The masters remonstrated. Jackson disregarded their remonstrances, and kept the slaves at work until many of them were killed by the enemy's shot ; yet his action was approved by Mr. Madison, the Cabinet, and by the Congress, which has ever refused to pay the masters for their losses. In this case, the mas ters were professedly friends to the Government ; and yet our Presidents, and cabinets, and generals have not hesitated to emancipate their slaves, whenever in time of war it was supposed to be for the interest of the country to do so. This was done in the exercise of the war power to which Mr. Adams referred, and for which he had the most abundant authority.' " In 1836, General Jessup engaged several fugitive slaves to act as guides and spies, agreeing, if they would serve the Government faithfully, to secure to them the freedom of themselves and families. They fulfilled their engagement in good fMth. The General gave them their freedom, and sent them to the west Mr. Van Buren's administration sanctioned the contract, and Mr. Tyler's administration approved the proceedings of the General in setting the slaves and their families ft-ee. «* « * * * **• " In 1838 General Taylor captured a number of negroes said to be fugitive slaves. Citizens of Florida, learning what had been done, immediately gathered around his camp, intending to secure the slaves who had escaped from them. General Taylor told them that he had no prisoners but ' prisoners ot war.' The claimants then desired to look at them in order to determine whether he was holding their slaves as prisoners. The veteran warrior replied that no man should examine his prisoners for such a purpose ; and he ordered them to depart. This action, being reported to the War Department, was approved by the Executive. The slaves, however, were sent west, and set free." Perhaps the clearest and fuUest exposition of the war powers ofthe Government, to be found in any paper, previous to the ciril war, is contained in a speech of John Quincy Adams, raade in the House of Representatives, on the 26th of May, 1836. This speech of this learned jurist and states man is very reraarkable, as containing raany of the positions taken by Mr. Lincoln in support of the extraordinary powers he was corapelled to use during the war. Mr. Adaras said : 712 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. "[Sir, in the authority given to Congress hy the Constitution of the United States to declare war, all the powers incidental to war are, by necessary implication, con ferred upon the Oovemm,ent of the United States. Now, the powers incidental to war are derived, not from their internal municipal source, hui from the laws and usages of nations. " There are, then, Mr. Chairman, in the authority of Congress and of the Executive, two classes of powers, altogether different in their nature, and often incompatible with each other — the war power and the peace power. The peace power is Umited by regulations and restricted by provisions prescribed within the Consti tutloir it self The war power is limited only by the laws and usages ot nations. This power Is tremendous ; U is strictly constiiuiional, bid it breaks down every barrier so anxiously erected for the protection of liberty, of property, and of life. This, sir, is the power which authorizes you to pass the resolutions now before you, and, in my opinion, no other. * * * » * * * " But the war power of Congress over the institution of slavery in the States is yet far more extensive. Suppose the case of a servile war, complicated, as to some extent it is even now, with an Indian war ; suppose Congress were called to raise armies, to supply ¦money from the whole Union to suppress a servile insurrection ; would they have no authority to interfere with the institution of slavery ? The issue of a servile war may be disastrous ; it may become necessary for the master of the slave to recognize his emancipation by a treaty of peace ; can it for an instant be pretended that Congress, In such a contingency, would have no authority to inter fere with the institution of slavery, in any way, in the States ? Why, it would be equivalent to saying that Congress has no constitutional authority to make peace. I suppose a more portentous case, certainly within the bounds of possl- bUIty— I would to God I could say, not within the bounds of probability. " Do you Imagine that your Congress will have no constitutional authority to Interfere with the Institution of slavery, in any way, in the States of this con federacy ? Sir, they must and wlU interfere with 11^-perhaps to sustain it by war, perhaps to abolish It by treaties of peace ; and they will not only possess the con stitutional power so to interfere, but they will be bound in duty to do it, by the express provisions of the Constitution Itself. From the instant that your slave- holding States become the theatre of a war, ewil, servile, or foreign war, from that instant the war powers of Congress extend to Interference with the Institution of slavery. In every way by which it can be Interfered with, from a claim of In demnity for slaves taken or destroyed, to the cession of States burdened with slavery to a foreign power. " I might furnish a thousand proofs to show that the pretensions of gentlemen to the sancity of their municipal institutions under a state of actual Invasion and of actual war, whether servile, civil, or foreign. Is wholly unfounded, and that the laws of war do, in all such cases, take the precedence. I lay this down as the law of nations. I say that military authority takes, for the time, the place of all muni cipal institution, and slavery among the rest : and that, under that state of things, so far from its being true that the States where slavery exists have the exclusive management of the subject, not only the President of the United States, but the commander of the army, has power to order the universal emancipation of the slaves." The right, under the law of nations, to emancipate the slaves of an enemy, will probably not hereafter be seriously questioned. The duty of the Executive to do this, under the circumstances which existed when the power was exercised by President Lincoln, as a means of saving the republic, is still more clear. Duriug the rebellion, and especiaUy in the earlier stages, the question was rauch discussed, y^hether \he President could rightfully suspend the writ of Habeas Corpu.s. SUSPENSION OF THE HABEAS CORPUS. 713 In Great Britain, Parliament alone can suspend the writ; Imt it has been the practice there, when the national safety requires its suspension and Parliament is not in session, for the Ministers of the Crown to suspend it and make arrests; and on the assembling of ParUament, ask an act of indem nity, and that the writ be suspended.* It is curious to trace the simUarity of discussion and of topics in the debates upon biUs of indemnity, and authorizing the suspension of the Habeas Corpus in the British Parliament, and in the Congress of the United States during the rebelUon. When, in 1689, the writ had been suspended in England, in discuss ing a BiU authorizing a continuance of the suspension, Hampden said: " We are in war, and if we make only use of that as if we were in full peace, you may be destroyed Arithout remedy." Another member said: "Let the danger be ever so great, I would not dispense with the Habeas Corpus but by Parliament."t The writ has been frequently suspended in England, when ever the Governraent has been threatened by conspiracy, sedition, or treason. In the recess of Parliaraent it has been suspended by Ministers of the Crown, but in all cases the sanction of Parliaraent has been asked and given. The Constitution of the United States was made by those who had learned their lessons of liberty under the old securities of the British MagnaCharta, and the "free system of English laws," and it contained this provision : " The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless, when in case of rebellion or invasion, the pubUc safety may require it." In 1807, at the time of Burr's conspiracy. Congress being in session, a bill passed the Senate authorizing the suspen sion of the writ, but did not pass the House, because before it was acted upon, the necessity for it ceased. It was held by Chief Justice Marshall, in the case of Bollraan, that it was forthe Legislature to decide mj Am " the pubUc safety raight require the suspension of the writ."J * 1 Blackstone's Com. 223. 3 Macauley's England 87 t5 Cobbltt's Parliamentary Debates, 267. I See Ex parte Bollman, i Cranch R, 714 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. Arrests were made with the knowledge and at the instance of Washington, during the Revolution, and the officer having the arrested persons in charge refused to obey the writ of Habeas Corpus issued by the State Judges. Subsequently, the acts of arrests were sanctioned by the Legislatures of the States iu which they occurred. The law, I think, may be regarded as now settled, that the Executive may, when Congress is not in session, suspend the writ, subject to the approval of Congress. When, in 1861, the life of the Nation was threatened, and the public safety required the suspension of the writ ; when on one side of the Capital, and separated frora it only by the Potoraac, was Virginia in revolt; and on the other, Maryland, a large portion of her citizens in league with traitors; and Washingtonitself full of spies and rebels; President Lincoln did, as had been done by William the IH. of England, suspend the writ of Habeas Corpus, and caused the arrest of such persons, as in his judgment, the public safety required. General Banks arrested George P. Kane, Chief of PoUce of Baltimore, and others; and General McClellan arrested the Maryland Legislature, to prevent thera frora passing an act of secession; and other parties were arrested in different sections of the country. Araong others, John Merryraan, of Baltimore, was arrested while holding a commission from the Rebel Government, and recruiting troops to fight against the Republic. Chief Justice Taney issued a writ, which General Cad- wallader, under instructions from the Secretary of War, refused to obey. The Chief Justice held that the President had not the constitutional right to suspend the writ of Habeas Corpus, and that the arrest was illegal.* The sym pathies of the Chief Justice were so notoriously with the slaveholders, that his opinion has not received from jthe Bench or the Bar of the country, the consideration which wduld have been given to it upon a question of law,.not connected with politics. The Attorney-General, Mr. Bates, gave an able and elabor- • See McPherson's History, p. 158, SUSPENSION OF THE HABEAS CORPUS. 715 ate opinion, sustaining the right of the President to suspend the privilege of the Habeas Corpus, as he was especially charged, by the Constitution, with the public safety. He Also held, that the President, as Coraraander-in-Chief, in car rying on war, raight declare raartial law, and thus suspend this writ. In this judgraent, Horace Binney, a distinguished jurist of Philadelphia, concurred, as did Judge Parsons, who held, that the President was vested with discretion to suspend the writ.* No final action of Congress was had upon the subject, until March, 1863. At the Third Session of the Thirty- Seventh Congress, an act was passed, providing that during the rebellion the President, whenever in his judgment the fublic safety might require it, was authorized to suspend the » McPherson, p. 162. Judge Parsons says : " The first and most important ques tion is, who may decide when the exigency occurs, and who may, if it occurs, declare martial law. Onthlspolntlhavemyself nodoubt. Theclause on this subject is contained in the flrst article of the Constitution, and the article relates principally to Congress. Nor can there be any doubt that Congress may, when the necessity occurs, suspend the right to the writ of habeas corpus, or, which Is the same thing, declare or authorize martial law. The question is, has the President this power ? The Constitution does not expressly give this power to any department of the Gov ernment, nor does It expressly reserve It to Congress, although, in the same article, it does make this express reservation as to some of the provisions contained in the article. This may be a mere accidental omission, but it seems to me more reason able and more consonant with the principles of legal interpretation to infer from It an absence of intention to confine it to Congress. And I am confirmed lu this opinion by the nature of the case. "The very instances specified as those in which the right to Jiabeas corpus may be suspended (invasion and rebelUon) are precisely those in which the reasons for doing so may come suddenly, the necessity of determination be immediate, and a cer tainty exist that the suspension wlU be useless, and the whole mischief which the suspension might prevent, take place if there be any delay. To guard against the suspension by limiting the cases, as is done, seems to me wise ; to obstruct it by requring the delay necessarily arising from legislative action would seem to be unreasonable. It is tme that my construction gives to the President, in the two cases of rebeUion and invasion, a vast power ; but so is all military power. It is a vast power to send into a rebelUous district 15,000 soldiers, as Washington did, whose duty it is to meet the rebels, and, if necessary, kiU as many as they could. But it was a power which belonged to him, of necessity as President; and so, I think, did the power of martial law. If it did not, then, when his troops had captured the armed rebels whom they were sent to subdue, the nearest magistrate who could issue a writ ot habeas corpus might have summoned the officer having them In charge to bring them before him, and might have liberated them at once to fight again, and this as often as they were captured, untU a law could be passed ^''Hthe^Wer belongs to the President, he may exercise it at his discretion, when either Invasion or rebelUon occurs, subject, however, to two qualii^cations: One, a universal one, applicable to his exercise of every POwer If he abuses it^ or exer cises it wrongfully he is liable to impeachment. The other is more a matter of cises It wrongmiiy, ne i^ ii^o ^ ^^ ^.^ j^j^ ^^^ j^ discretion or propriety. I suppose tnat ne viu^xim, -j , r such a matter to Congress when he could, and be governed by their action.' 7i-6 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus, in any case, through out the Un;ted States or any part thereof. Another section provided, that any order of the President, or under his authority, made at any tirae during the present rebelUon, should be a defence in all courts to any action or prosecution, civil or crirainal, for any arrest or seizure, under or by virtue of such order.* This act has been sustained by the courts. Much was said during the conflict, much is still said in regard to the status of the rebellious States. In the begin ning, the rebellion was treated by the Governraent as an insurrection of " certain persons " in the seceding States, but it very rapidly assuraed the raagnitude of a civil war, involv ing all residing in the territory of the insurgent States in its consequences, and raaking that territory, and the authority which controlled it, a public eneray. The insurgents clairaed the rights, and becarae subject, for the tirae being, to the laws by which belligerents treat each other in tirae of war. AU departraents of the Governraent treated the insurgents as public enemies. The question was settled judicially by the Supreme Court of the United States, in March, 1863. f The court held "That where the course of justice is inter rupted by revolt, rebelUon, or insurrection, so that the courts of justice cannot be kept open,. civil war exists, and hostilities may be prosecuted on the same footing as if those opposing the Governraent were foreign enemies." "All persons resid ing in this territory (the insurgent States) are liable to be treated as enemies. * * * They are none the less enemies because they are traitors." What rights had the United States over the subjugated territory lately in rebellion ? We have seen that President Lincoln, for the tirae being, governed the territory, exercis ing all the power over it usually exercised by a conqueror. He did this under the law of nations. He had the right to do it, as a portion of the United States, where the loyal re publican governraent had first been overthrown by a hostUe power which raade war upon the United States. After con quering and subduing that hostile power, it became his duty * McPherson, p. 183. + See the case of the Hiawatha, 7 Black's Bep., 687, etc THE RIGHT TO GOVERN THE REBELLIOUS STATES. 717 to govern the country, subject, of course, to the control of Congress, until republican State Governraents, loyal to the Union, could be reestablished. Araong the cases decided by the Suprerae Court, bearing on this subject, are the following : The case of Fleraing vs. Page.* In this case, the United States, being at war with Mexico, conquered and took possession of the State of Tamaulipas, and the court held that it was, for the tirae being, under the military governraent of the President. He, by his subordinates, established a Custom House, and col lected duties, and these impositions were held valid by the Supreme Court. In the case of Cross vs. Harrison, 16 How ard Rep., 187, San Francisco, in California, having been captured by the United States, the President authorized the military and naval coraraanders of our forces to form a civil government for the conquered territory, and to impose duties on imports, etc. Subsequently, California was ceded by treaty to the United States, and the military authority and government continued. The court held, among other things, that the President might dissolve that authority by withdrawing the army, and that "Congress might have put an end io it." This not having been done, the acts of the military authorities imposing and collecting duties were held valid. The same principles were applied and sustained in the government of New Mexico. "Upon the acquisition, in the year 1846, by the arms of the United States, of the Territory of New Mexico, the ciril government of this Territory having been overthrown, the officer. General Kearney, holding possession for the United States in virtue of the power of conquest and occu pancy, and in obedience to the duty of maintaining the security of the inhabitants in their persons and property,. ordained under the sanction and authority of the United States a provisional or temporary government for the acquired Territory. * * * By the substitution of a new sup remacy, although the former poUtical relations of the inhabit ants were dissolved, their private relations, and their rights * 9 Howard Rep., 614. 718 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. arising frora contract or usage, reraained in full force and unchanged, except as far as they were in iheir nature cmd char acter found io be in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the United States, or with any regulations which the conquering and occupying authority should retain."* Such is the law of nations as expounded by the Supreme Court of the United States, and sustained by the highest judicial authorities everywhere. In accordance with the principles sanctioned by these decisions, and the action of the administration of both President Lincoln and his succes sor, it may be assumed as settled, that the Confederates were public enemies, the Rebel Governraents, both State and Con federate, having been overthrown, the United States, in obedience to the duty of maintaining the security of the in habitants, in their persons and property, and to carry out the obUgation to guarantee to each State, a government, repub lican in form, and to restore them ultimately to the Union, rightfully ordained provisional governraents for the rebeUious territory. Much of the confusion, and difference of opinion araong the people in regard to the condition or status of the Rebel States, has arisen frora the arabiguity of language. Upon the rauch raooted question whether the Rebel States were in the Union or out of it, during and at the close of the war, there is probably really less difference of opinion araong con tending parties, than the persons coraposing those parties suppose. The land of the eleven seceding States has always consti tuted a part of the United States, and has never been out of theUnion; nothing but successful revoliijion could take it out. But " a State," within the raeaning ©fthe Constitution, as a State entitled to representation in Congress, and to par ticipate in the Electoral Colleges, is ihe corporation formed by the people, for the purpose of local State Governraent. Were the eleven seceding State corporations, which raade up the Confederacy during the war. States in the Union ! Each of them had, as a corporation, withdrawn from the Union, organized a de facto State Government in hostility to the Union, and was to the extent of their ability, carrying * 20 Howard S. C. Rep., 176. THE RIGHT TO GOVERN REBELLIOUS STATES. 719 on war against it. Were these de facto State Governments at that time States in the Union, and entitled to representation in Congress, and to vote in the Electoral Colleges ? AU will answer no. So the courts, and every department of the Governraent have always held. When these Rebel Governraents, State and Confederate, were overthrown, in what way were new, loyal, and repub lican State Governraents to be organized ? The State Gov ernraents existing before the war, had rebelled, and consti tuted the State Government defacto during the war, and being now overthrown, there were no State Governments remain ing in the territory lately in rebellion. The President, in his proclaraations appointing Provisional Governors, after the surrender of Lee and Johnston, says that the rebeUion had "deprived ihe people of these Slates of all civil governmeni." When in the spring and early sumraer of 1865, the de facto Governors of States lately in rebeUion, issued proclaraations, calUng the de facto Legislatures of the States to raeet, the military authorities of the United States prohibited such meetings, deposed the Governors and other officers, and appointed others in their place, and required that proceed ings to establish civil governraent should start fresh and new frora the loyal people, under the authority and direction of the National Governraent. Not only this, but the Presi dent in his proclamation, declared all acts and proceedings of the political, military, and civil organizations " of the late Confederate and State Governments null and void." * The right to irapose conditions upon the people of the States lately in rebelUon, is scarcely questioned by any loyal man ; what departraent of the National Government shaU deterraine what those conditions shall be, is a question about which there is greater difference of opinion. The adminis tration of Andrew Johnson dictated to the seceding States the leading provisions which they were required to incorpo rate into their new State Constitutions. They were required, among other things, to ratify the Constitutional amendment prohibiting slavery, and to repudiate the rebel debt. Mr. Seward, Secretary of State, wrote to Provisional Governor Perry, of Sputh Carolina, under date of November 6, 1865, • See Proclamation of May 9, 1865 720 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. " The President considers the acceptance by South Carolina of the araendraent, (Constitutional araendraent abolishing slavery,) as indispensable to a restoration of her relations with the other States of the Union." The question has assumed very grave iraportance, whether, under the Constitution, it was the duty of the President, or Congress, to prescribe the terras and conditions upon which the States lately in rebelUon might return to the Union. Whatever in this direction was done by Mr. Lincoln, was always done, subject to the approval and sanction of Con gress ; and his successor, up to a late day in 1865, seems to have proceeded upon the same idea. The Secretary of State, under direction of the President, on the 12th of September, 1865, wrote to Provisional Gov ernor Marvin, of Florida, " It must be, however, distinctly understood that ihe restoration, to which your proclamation refers, wUl be subject to the decision of Congress." Is the duty of prescribing terms and conditions upon which the lately rebellious people of the seceding States may return to the Union, an Executive, or a Legislative act ? Who is to judge whether a people presenting a Constitution, and asking recognition and admission into the Union, have adopted a Constitution republican in form ? This question has been settled by the Suprerae Court of the United States, by Congress, and by the people. Whether a State, appearing with her Senators and Members, has a Constitution, republican in form, and whether she shall be adraitted, is a question which raust be settled by the law-raaking power — Congress, with the approval of the President, or, by Congress passing a bill, nothwithstanding the objections of the President. This question was settled by the Suprerae Court, in the celebrated Rhode Island case.* This case arose frora an atterapt made by a part, perhaps a majority, of the people of that State, to set up a new State Government, forraed by the voluntary act of the people, without any enabling act either of Congress or the State; and which, in its atterapt, raet with arraed resistance frora the existing State Government. •.iiuther V. Borden, 7 Howard's R. p. 1. THE RIGHT TO GOVERN THE REBELLIOUS STATES. 721 The Suprerae Court, after quoting Section 4 of Article rv. of the Constitution, says: "Under this article ofthe Constitution, it rests with Congress to decide what governraent is the established one in a State ; for, as the United States guarantee to each State a republican government. Congress must necessarily decide what governraent is established in a State before it can determine whether it is republican or not ; and when the Senators and Representatives of a State are admitted into the councils of the Union, ihe authority of ihe Govemment under which ihey are appointed, as well as its republican character, are recognized by the proper constiiuiional authority, and its decision is binding upon every other depart ment of the Government." This is in accordance with the uniforra practice of the Governraent in regard to the adraission of Territories. Frora this brief and imperfect sketch, or outline, of the loar powers, clairaed and exercised during the rebeUion, it is obrious that many of them were novel, and some of them widely conflicting with public opinion formed in the quiet days of peace. President Lincoln assumed the exercise of these great powers cautiously, often reluctantly, unwiUing, except under the pressure of suprerae necessity, to establish precedents so liable to abuse by more ambitious, unscrupulous, and arbitrary successors. The action of the Government during the rebeUion estabUshed the fact to all, that our republican institutions, while affording the amplest security and protection to the citizen in tirae of peace, was as powerful and as efficient as a more arbitrary government in tirae of civil war. That the Commander-in-Chief and the war-making power had con trol over the resources, the men, raaterial, and raoney of the RepubUc, and that our Government was as able and efficient as any to suppress insurrection *nd cope with civil war. The world beheld with surprise, and sorae astonishment, a free RepubUc, acting in accordance with its organic law as era- bodied in its written Constitution, contending against raore than eight raiUions of its rebeUious subjects; wieldingvast arraies and navies; controlling and concentrating, wth unsurpassed energy, the immense physical resources of twenty miUions 722 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OF SLAVERY. of loyal subjects, and using them with complete success ; and doing this through the sarae instrumentality which, in time of peace, had advanced the growth, prosperity and grandeur of the American people raore rapidly than was ever before known in the history of nations. There can, I think, be no doubt, that the conviction of the strength of our republican form of governraent, founded upon a just appreciation of what it has done, and especially of its war powers under the Constitution, contributed greatly to the determination by foreign governments not to interfere in our affairs. The terrible events of the war have educated the people to broader and wiser views of the character of our Constitutional Govei-nment. Thegreatbody of the people have been brought to entertain new views of their Constitution, and to respect and to revere it raore highly than ever. They have learned, in the trials of the late contest, that the rights, privileges, and imraunities of States and citizens in the tirae of peace, are raaterially raodified in tirae of war ; that people and States which make war upon the Governraent, becorae public enemies, and thus repudiating, lose the rights guaranteed to them in tirae of peace under the Constitution, and are to be treated in accordance M'ith the laws of war. These doctrines, before the terraination of the war, were adopted and acted upon by the President, the Cabinet, by Congress and by the Supreme Court. Although it is difficult to define with exact precision all that has been settled by the war, yet most of the foUowing propositions have been adopted by the President, the Cabi net, Congress, and the Supreme Court, and few of them, it is beUeved, will be questioned hereafter : First, That the Constitution of the United States, and the laws made in pursuance thereof, are the suprerae law of the land, anything in the ConstiUition and laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. Second, That the United States constitute one Nation ; that the States are subordinate parts of the one Republic; that aUegiance to the National Government is constitutionaUy due from every citizen ; and that no State can by secession, nullification, nor by any act short of successful revolution, WHAT HAS BEEN SETTLED BY THE WAR. 723 absolve any citizen from that allegiance and the obligation to obey the laws of the Nation. Third, That States and citizens of States rebelling against and making war upon the United States, becorae public enemies, and are not entitled while such, to set up the priv ileges of citizens, under the Constitution, to shield them from liability as public eneraies. Fourth, That the right to eraancipate the slaves of a public eneray, in time of war, is legal according the law of nations. Fifth, The Rebel States having withdrawn from the Union, and having through their State Governments in their cor porate capacity, set up a hostile Governraent de facto, upon the soil of the United States, and organized a Confed erate Government de facto within its jurisdiction, it became the duty of tbe National authorities to overthrow and subju gate these usurping and hostile Governments and expel them frora their territory. Sixth, Such hostile de facto Governments, State and Con federate, being overthrown and expeUed, it thereupon became the duty of the United States to govern the territory consti tuting the insurgent States, until Governments, republican in form could be organized and estabUshed in such States. Seventh, That during the continuance of war, and while such hostile State and Confederate cfe/acfo Governraents were in existence, they were not entitled to participate in the Gov ernraent they were thus seeking to overthrow. When such hostile organizations were subjugated, it becarae the duty of the United States to organize, establish, and guarantee to such States, State Governraents republican in forra; and that until such new State Governraents were organized, loyal to the Union, and republican in form, of which Con gress must determine, such portions of the Union are not of their own motion and independent of the action of Congress, entitled to representation in Congress or participation in the Electoral College. In the language of Mr. Lincoln, it is for Congress to say "when or whether merabers should be adraitted to seats in Congress from those States." * * That secession, and nuUification are treason, has been established by the judi ciary of last resort, the conflict of arms. That which would have been done by Mr. Lincoln, had he Uved, and what was expected on the accession of Mr. Johnson. 724 LINCOLN AND THE OVERTHROW OP SLAVERY. The national authority vindicated by war and established by victory, is now placed on solid foundations, maintaining the rights of the States to raanage their local affairs, our Governraent in the hands of a pure and wise raan, like Lin coln, is the strongest and best in the world. It is the strongest, because its officers are the servants of the people, and the Constitution is the highest expression of the will of the people ; and the war has shown that the people will rise to its support and maintenance with an energy unknown under any other form of governraent. When before have the people rose by the miUion, and voluntarily gone into the army to sustain a governraent ? When before have any people as suraed voluntarily such enorraous pecuniary burdens to was a solemn, imposing judicial trial, conviction, and sentence of traitors. The one act of his life to which Mr. Andrew Johnson owed the Vice Presidency, was the bold' denunciation of traitors which he uttered in the Senate on the 2d of March, 1861. The people, when he entered the Executive Chair, remembered that he then and there said " were I Fresident, I would do as Jefl'erson did in 1806, with Aaron Burr. I would have them (the conspirators) arrested, and if convicted within the meaning and scope of the Constitulion, by the etemal Ood I would execute them." ( Congressional Globe, Second Session, Thirty-sixth Congress, p. 1354.) He did not for a few weeks after his accession permit the people to forget these declarations. In his reply to the Illinois delegation, and on other occasions hia language was so vehement, passionate and denunciatory against traitors that con siderate people feared an excess of violence, and an absence of the sobriety, dignity aud decorum which should ever characterize the Magistrate In the administration of justice. By what means the President has been induced to take to his confldence as his most trusted advisers, those whom he threatened to hang as traitors, it is not my purpose now to investigate. But the thoughtful people of the United States anticipated not for the purpose of vengeance, but for the infiuence of example to make treason " odious," and to deter in future, bold, bad and|ambitious men from stirring up civil war, that the decision of the sword would be affirmed by the most imposing State trial in modern times. The world cannot yet be governed without punishing crime— aud there Is no way by which crime can so eflfectually be made "fidious," as by hanging a criminal. But this apparently is not to be. In the present condition of aflTalrs, with the President on the side of the prisoner, it would be a failure and a farce. There will be probably no judicial trial. The spectacle will be presented, of a conspiracy covering a whole continent with blood, a rebeUion carrying death and desolation throughout the land, without one convicted criminal, or one judicial sentence. Those who plotted treason in the Cabinet and in Congi-ess, those pledged to loy alty by ofiicial oaths, the soldiers who deserted their flag, those who were responsi ble for the horrors of Andersonville and the butchery at Fort Pillow, are all to be forgiven, restored to their forfeited rights, and their treason, Instead of being made odious, is to be considered honorable and heroic. The most guilty are to be the most honored ; while the faithful Union men are to be driven into exile by perse cution and social ostracism ! The leading traitors are to be canonized and held up as examples for the young to emulate and follow. Robert E. Lee is President of a coUege, and Raphael Semmes a professor and teacher of moral philosophy ! TRIAL OF THE CONSTITUTION. 725 maintain the integrity of a nation ? In war, as in peace, the popular will, constitutionally expressed, is sovereign. While the Constitution protects the rights of the humblest citizen in time of peace, in tirae of war it calls into action and concentrates all the physical resources of the country against a public eneray, by evoking the war powers of the Constitution as now interpreted by the ablest statesmen and raost learned jurists of the Republic. The trial of the Consiituiion has thus far been a triuraphant success. It has passed successfully through the terrible trial of the great civil war, and thus far has stood the still more fearful ordeal to which it has been subjected since the mar tyrdom of Lincoln. What dangers it will encounter in the iraraediate future, what new perils arising frora the obstinacy, temper, treachery, or arabitiou of rulers, none can clearly foresee. But those who, during the last six eventful years, have traced in all our national affairs the guiding, overruling hand of Alraighty God, ofttimes bringing good out of apparent evil; 'those who have watched the generous patriotisra, and the instinctive wisdom, sagacity and good sense, and the sublirae love of country and of liberty which have raarked the conduct of the American people, will "never despair of the RepubUc." God and the people wiU save our country, in spite of the wickedness of traitors and the treachery of rulers. INDEX ABOLITIONISTS— Society, of 28 Rewards ofl'ered for 39 Abolition party formed 43 ADAMS, J. Q— Defends right of petition 40 ALABAMA, THE 553 AMERir.VN PARTY 94 NominatesFUmoreandDonelson 95 AMNESTY— Terms of proclaimed by the Presi dent 470 ANTI-SLAVERY - National Convention in Philadel phia in 1833; American Anti- Slavery Society organized 38 ARMY OP THE POTOMAC— Org.anized 238 Its inactivity under McClellan 239 Its admirable equipment 307, 32i ElTective force of April 30, 1862 328 Leaders of its three Corps 527 ARNOLD, ISAAC N.— Introduces bill to prohibit slav ery in the Territories 259,280 ARRESTS— Political 392 Discussed by Congress 392 Defended by Lincoln 393, 394 BAKER, COL. OF OREGON— Denounces Breckinridge 218, 219 Speech on resolution approving of acts of Lincoln 228, 229 Death 239 BALL'S BLUFF 239 BALTIMORE 199 Attack on Massachusetts volun teers on April 19 194 BANKS, GEN 237 Captures Port Hudson 411 BARBARITIES OF REBELS,.. .600-6, 660 BELMONT— Battle of. 240 BENJAMIN, JUDAH P 54 BINGHAM, MK. OF OHIO 224 Speech on abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia, 255, 256, 257 On enrollment bill 377 On We-st Virginia 385 On members from Louisiana 387 BLAIR, F. P., SEN.— Visits the Confederate authorities at Richmond....; 617, 618 BLAIR, F. P. JR 238 Speech 254 BLAIR, MONTGOMERY 180 BLOCKADE OF SOUTH'N PORTS... 202 "BLUE LODGES" 64 PAai. BOOTH, J. W.— Assassinates Lincoln 663 Shot by Corbett 663 BORDER .-STATES— Position of 188 Refuse to aid in suppressing the rebellion 194, 195 BRECKINRIDGE, JOHN C 63 Joins the secessionists 216 Expelled from the U. S. Senate ... 218 BROOKS, JAMES G.— Announces in Congress the death of slavery 477, 488 Attack on Butler 607 BROWN, B. GRATZ, OP MO.— Addresses the Senate in favor of emancipation 453, 454 BROWNING, O. H 215, 269 BROWN, JOHN m Defended by Thaddeus Stevens.... 611 BUCHANAN 94, 95 Cabinet of. 98 Apathy towards secession 166 Cabinet abets tlie secessionists .... 154 Position regarding secession.. 156, 157 Southern members of his Cabinet resign 165 Denies right of Congress to coerce a seceded State 694, 700 BUFFALO ANTI-SLAVERY CON VENTION 43 Causes defeat of Gen. Cass 45 BULL RUN— Battle of 230, 231, 232 EflTects of 232 Popular feeling after 232, 233 BURNSIDE, GEN. A. E 345, 355 Assumes command of the Army ofthe Potomac 362 ' Starts for Fredericksburg 363 Fails to cross the Rappahannock for lack of pontoons 363 Attacks rebels at Fredericksburg. 364 BUTLER, GEN. B. F 193 Advises Buchanan to arrest seces sionists J°» Marches into Baltimore •.-.¦ i»» Declares negroes "contraband of war " ^i Captures Fort Hatteras...... ¦«» Denounced by Mr. Brooks as a " gold robber " ¦¦•¦•¦•¦• "'^j ""* Vindicated by Messrs. Boutwell and Stevens • ""»> "j^ Relieved of his command.........^.. bit> BUREAU OF NATIONAL OUR- RENCY- ,q. Created !x| Of military justice '"-^ 727 728 INDEX. CALIFORNIA ^.^^^ Adopts anti-slavery constitution. 46 South opposes her admission Into the Union 46 CAMERON, SIMON 180 Orders to Gen. Sherman 236 Recommends emancipation and arming of slaves 247,250 Resigns his secretaryship 250 CASS, GEN 45 Resigns his seat in Buchanan's cabinet 158 CAVALRY RAIDS 408 CHASE, SENATOR, OP OHIO— Speech against the Kansas-Ne braska bill 52 Described ISO Resigns his position as Secretary of the Treasury 605 Wants to be President 506 Appointed by Lincoln Chief Jus- __ tice of the United States 574, 575 CHICAQO- Delegation of clergymen from, to President Lincoln 289 COLFAX, SCHUYLER 223 Speech on West Virginia 382 Moves the expulsion of Alex. Long from the House of Re presentatives 480, 481 Valedictory to 38th Congress.. 612, 613 COLORED MEN— Orders to enroll 236 Free declared citizens of United States by Att'y-Gen. Bates... 304, 305 Flock to the Union army 435 Threatened by Jetf. Davis with punishment by State authority, if captured 435, 4.36 Promised protection bylLincoln... 436 Also by Grant 436, 437 To be paid as white soldiers 448 Allowed to testify in U. S. courts and to carry mails 465 Families of colored soldiers made free by Congress 571 COLLAMER, JACOB 215, 222, 267 COMMISSIONERS— From rebels to Congress 186 COMMISSIONS, SANITARY AND CHRISTIAN— Organized 492, 493 Money expended by 493 Fairs held by 493, 494 COMMITTEE— On conduct of the war 251 COMPROMISE MEASURES OF 1850 47 CONFEDERATE GOVERNMENT— Recognized as a belligerent 204 CONFISCATION OF REBEL PROP ERTY 273, 276 Right ot denied 701 CONGRESS— The Thirty-third 48 Leading members of 49 The Thirty-seventh, extra sess. of 214 Second Session 244 The Thirty-seventh, third sess. of 369 Its leading anti-slavery measures 251 Its sympathy with Lincoln 395 Close of. 395, 396 Meeting of the Thirty-eighth 442 Merabers of 442, 443 Second session of 582 Summary of doings of. 611 War powers of Congress 692, 723 CONKLIN, ROSCOE 224 CLARK. DANIEL 273 CONSTli'UTION OF THE U. S.— Speeches In the Senate on the amendment abolishing slavery 456. 468 PAOK. Vote on, lu Senate 465 Debates on. In House of Repre sentatives 465, 468, 577, 587 Votes on 468,586 Adoption of amendment by the States 591, 592, 593 History of, during the war 691, 725 Its trial and triumph 725 CONVENTION— Kepublican National at Philadel phia in 1856 94 DiflTerences in, overcome by Lin coln 94 Nominates Fremont and D.ayton 95 Democratic at Cincinnati in 1856.. 94 Republican State at Decatur, 111., in 1860 138 At Richmond, Va., of seceders from Baltimore Democratic; 148 Charleston Democratic 140, 141, 142 Reports of committees at 141 Baltimore Democratic 142,148 Republican National In Chicago in 1860 142, 145 Nominates Lincoln for the Presi dency 145 Republican National at Baltimore 499, 501, 502 Letter of Isaac N. Arnold on at tempts to postpone 499, 500 Democratic National at Chicago in 1864 503, 504 Platform of. 504, 559 COX, S. S 224,',226, 260 CRITTENDEN, JOHN J„ 227 Introduces into Congress a resolu tion defining object of war 227, 228, 265, 257, 273 CUBRENCY— Depreciation of rebel - 437 Bureau of National, created 491 CURTIS, EX- JUDGE B. R.— Denies President's right to free slaves 699 DAWES,H. L 223,254,599 DAV1S,..HENRY WINTEBr- Speecli on the expulsion of Alex. Long from the House of Re presentatives 482, 486 On reconstruction 472, 599 DAVIS, JEFFERSON 99 Made' 'President of Provisional Government of the South 164 Treatment of colored troops 435 DIPLOMACY OF UNITED STATES— During the rebellion 206 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA— Capital located in 31,253 Lincoln introduces a bill for the abolition of slavery in 84, 85 Slavery abolished in 258 DIX. JOHN A 165 DOUGLAS, STEPHEN A 51 Described 51, 113, 121 Opposes Lecompton 100 Debates with Lincoln at Spring fleld, in 1855 89,90 Contrasted with Lincoln 112 "Squatter Sovereignty" doctrines 113 The slave power seeks to degrade him 113 Challenged by Lincoln, iu 1858, to debate 119,120 Discussions with Lincoln at Chi cago, Springfield, Ottawa, Gales burg, and Alton 121-5 Specimen of his manner 130 Replies to Lincoln's Interroga tions 132, 133, 134 Re-elected Senator, in IMS 134 Pledges his support to Lincoln as President 178 INDEX. 729 Remarkable prophecy 178, 179 Dispatch to the North) 190 Speech in Chicago, at " Wigwam" 191 Death 213 DRED SCOTT CASE 101, 102 Decision in characterized by Geo. Bancroft 103 Lincoln's views of. 129 ELECTION- Presidential, of 185& 91, 92 For Senator from Illinois, in 1868.. 134 Presidential of 1860 140, 501-5 Counting of Electoral votes In Congress 167, 168 State elections in fall of 1S63 441 Political state of the country be fore Presidential of 1860 497, 498 Presidential, of 1864.... 559, 56a 561, 595 Rebel States prohibited, by Con gress, from voting for Presi dent and Vice President 595, 596 ELLIOTT, THOMAS D.. . ... 276, 279 ELLSWORTH, COL. ELMER B 203 EMANCIPATION — By Congress, of all slaves claimed or held by rebels 277, 278 Debates in Congress, July, 1861, on confiscation and emancipa tion 273,280 Gradual compensated recom mended to Congress, by Lin coln 280, 281, 369, 370, 371, 372 Co-operation in by U. S. proposed by Congress 284 Universal, demanded by the North 288 Urged by Lincoln's friends, 291,292,293 Lincoln's proclamation of Eman cipation 293-300 Reception of it by the Nation 301, 3C2 Endorsed by Congress 302 Sneered at by Lord RusseU 303 BUl for compensated, lost In Con- , gress. 372, 373 Proclamation of, sanctioned by House of Representatives 373 Welcomed by army 301 BUl for a Bureau of, reported In Congress 477 Emancipat'n in Louisiana 509, 510, 511 In Tennessee 511, 512 In Maryland 512, 513, 514 In Missouri 516, 516 Steps by which the RepubUc was led to 590 Effected by the Republican party 591 Opinion of Wm. Whiting, Esq., on right of President to eman cipate slaves 708, 70> Vle^rs of Washington and Jeffer son concerning emancipation as a belUgerent right 709, 710 Practice of Great Britain and France touching same 709, 712 EMIGBANTAID SOCIETIES 64 ENROLLMENT BILI^ Introduced by Senator Wilson 374,375 Discussed in Congress 374,381 EUROPEAN GOVERNMENTS— Aspect towards secession 205 FENTON, R. E 224 FANUEIL HALL— Resolutions passed by People's Convention, at 698 FARRAGUT, ADMIBAI^ Captures New Orleans 386 At Mobile FESSENDEN, WM. P.,— Speech on enrollment of negro soldiem 266 PAOB. Senator from Maine 222 Appointed Seeretary;of the Trea sury 506, 507 FLORIDA— Purchase of. 32 War with the Seminoles 35 FLOYD, JOHN B.,— Sends munitions of war to the South 155 Beslgns 165 FOOTE COMMODORE 238 Captures; Fort Henry 309 FOOTE, SOLOMON 215 FORT SUMTER^ Attacked 189 Effects of its fall 192 FBANKLIN, BENJAMIN— On slavery 27 FBBEDMEN— Condition of, discussed in Con gress 477 Passage by Congress of the Freed men's Bureau Bill 594, 595 FREE SOIL PAETY 43 FREE STATES— Fourteen of protest against the extension of slavery 45 FBEMONT, JOHN C 95 Appointed Major General 234 Declares slaves of rebels to be free 234 Relieved of his command 239 FUGITIVE SLAVES— Law of 1793 concerning 31 Bepeal of 447, 448 FUNEHAL OF LINCOLN— Ceremonies at Washington... 667, 668 At Baltimore and Philadel phia 669, 670 At New York and Albany 670, 671 At Chicago 671 At Springfield 672, 673 GARFIELD, GENEBAL 308 Bebukes his colleague, Alex. Long, as a traitor 479, 480 Advocates the Constitutional Amendment 584 GABNBE, MABGABET— Slays her chUdren 96 GARBISON, WM.L 38 Visits President Lincoln 38 GEARY, GOVEBNOB— Disgusted with the slave party m Kansas 65, 66 GETTYSBUBG •¦•¦ f20 Battle of v.;; fJS'^S Dedication of Cemetery at 422, 423, 424 Lincoln's address at 423, 424 Contrast between Lincoln's and Everett's addresses 424 GREELEY, HORACE- Urges the President to emanci- pate the slaves •.••¦ ¦*"' Entrapped by rebel agents in Canada oi'i'lI'Si GRIMES. J. W 215, 266, 381 GOVEBNOBS— . - , ., Of loyal States, meeting at Al- toona, Pa ^"' GBANT, GBNEBAIr- Captures Belmont f"> Captures Fort Donelson...... •.••• 3ua Defeats the rebels at Shiloh.... 314, 315 Captures Vicksburg. •;¦ • 4UO-7 Appointed Lieutenant-General... 518 Attends President's Levee, in March, 1864 f'* His plan of campaign ••¦¦• mi Defeat of Lee '»*• >»* 730 INDEX. PASB. GRIERSON, COLONEL— Makes a cavalry raid through Mississippi 408, «9, 410 GROW, SPEAKER 214 Closing address to the Thirty- seventh Congress 396 HABEAS CORPUS— Suspension of legalized by Con gress 230, 395 Bight of suspending discussed 391, 392, 712, 713, 714, 715 How suspended in England 712 Opinion of Marshall, 0. J„. 714 Opinions of Attorney General Bates and Parsons, C. J 714, 715 The President empowered by Congress to suspend 715, 716 HAHN, MICHAEL! 389 Elected to Congress from Louisi ana. 509 Advocates return of the State to Union 389,390, 509,510 HALLECK. GENEBAL— Order No. 3 261 Succeeds Hunter in the West 815 Captures Corinth 316 Made General-in-Chief. 343 HAMILTON, A. J., OF TEXAS 163 HABBIS, BEPEESENTATIVE FBOM MAEYLAND— Declared by House of Eepresen tatives "an unworthy mem ber" 481,482 HALE, J. P 215 HARLAN. JAMES 215, 601 HICKS, GOVEBNOB OF MAEY LAND 194, 199,243 HOAB, JUDGE— Expelled from South Carolina 40 HOLT, JOSEPH— Secretary of War 165 Letter to President Lincoln con cerning Fremont's order free ing slaves of rebels 235 Appointed head of Bureau of Mil itary Justice 491 HOOKEB, GENEBAL JOSEPH 261 Appointed to command Army of Potomac 411 Defeated at Chancellorville... 412, 413 HOUSTON, SAM.,— Speech against Kansas-Nebraska Hill 55 HOWARD, J. M 279, 373 HOWARD, GENEBAL O. 0 414 Appointed head of the Freed men's Bureau 595 HUNTEB, GENEBAL DAVID 238 Organizes first regiment of negro troops 263 Eeplies to resolution of House of Representatives concerning it 264, 265 Declares all slaves free in South Carolina, Georgia and Florida... 264 ILLINOIS- Early courts of. 75,76 Growth contrasted with that of Missouri 107, 108, 109 First State that ratifies the Con stitutional Amendment 587, 588 INAUGUBATION- Description of Lincoln's flrst 173, 174 Of second 623-8 IREDELL, MB.— On slavery 27 JACKSON, STONEWALL— -- ¦ Drives Banks across the Potomac 830 Creates panic at Washington.. 330,331 Escapes from Fremont and Mc Dowell 331 Death of. 413 JEFFEESON, THOMAS— Opinion of slavery 28 JOHNSON, ANDREW 198, 214, 220 Denounces the traitors 220 Denounces Jefferson Davis. 221 Bequests Lincoln to except Ten nessee from the operation of the proclamation of emancipa tion 303 Nominated for Vice President of the United States 502 Appointed Provisional Governor of Tennessee 511 Declares that, if he were Presi dent, he would arrest and exe cute the traitors, (no(e) 724 JOHNSON, EEVEBDY- Speeches of. 449.450,462 JUDICIABY OF UNITED STATES— Long revered by the people 101 Disgraced by Dred Scott decision 101 KANSAS— Struggle of slaveholders and the Free State party 65,66,98 Eeports on elections in by com mittee of Congress 98 Civil war menaced in 98 KANSAS-NEBEASKA BILL 60 Address to llie people against 51 Final struggle on in Congress.... 55-62 Passage of 62 KING, PRESTON 215, 266, 268 KELLY,, W. D 224,597 LINCOLN, ABEAHAM- Described 67, 68, 674, 675 His ancestors 68, 69 Early Ufe 69, 70, 71, 72 Education 70, 71 Eemoves to Indiana 69 To Illinois 70 "The rall-splltter." 70 In Black Hawk War 72 Sent to tlie Legislature of Illinois. 72 Postmaster of Salem 72 Nominated as Speaker 73 His integrity 72,73 Studies law 73 Protests against pro-slavei-y reso lutions 74 Courts of Illinois 76 As a lawyer :.. 77,78, 88 Accepts a challenge 79 Marries 79 Argues case of negro girl "Nance" 79,80 Elected to Congress in 1847 37, 81 Speeches 82 Introduces a bill for the aboli tion of slavery in the District of Columbia 37, 84, 85 Campaign speecli in support of General Taylor's nomination to Presidency 82 Stumps New England for Taylor... 84 Opposes bill compensating offi cers for slaves lost in Seminole War 85 Offered the position of Governor of Oregon 85 Voted for in 1849-50 for office of U. S. Senator 86 Mechanical talent 86, 87 His only large fee for legal ser vices 87 Defends a poor widow's son charged with murder 87 . Tries his last law case 88 INDEX. 731 PAOB. Debate with Douglas at Spring- field and Peoria in 185.5. 89, 90 Withdraws as a candidate for the U. S. Senate in favor of Judge Trumbull 91 Leader of a new party organized in Northwest to resist slavery 92, 93 Supported for office of Vice Pre sident iu the Philadelphia Con vention 94 Contrasted with Stephen A. Douglas 112 Speech, June.lS58 114-119 Discussions with Douglas at Chi cago, Springaeld,Ottawa, Gales burg, and Alton 121-138 Views of the Dred Scott decision. 129 Answers Douglas's interroga tories 131, 132 Visits Kansas 135 Speeeh at Colurabus, 0 132 At Cincinnati 136 At Cooper Institute, N. Y 137, 138 "Bail candidate" for the Presi dency 138, 139 Nominated by Chicago Conven tion for the Presidency. 145, 146 By whom flrst nominated for Presidency, (Note) 145 Elected President 149 Farewell at Springfield... 168 Journey to Washington 168-172 Speech at Independence Hall, Philadelphia 170 Threatened with assassination.... 171 Inaugurated as President 173, 174 Inaugural address 175, 176, 177 AMDoiuts his Cabinet 179, 180, 181 Can for 75,000 men 184 Message to Thirty-seventh Con gress 216, 217, 218 Modifies Fremont's proclamation in Missouri 235 Treatment of a wounded soldier.. 240 Message to Congress in Decem ber, 1861 245, 216, 247 Recognizes right of Congress to legislate for insurgent States 247 Recommends gradual compen sated emancipation 280, 281 Repudiates General Hunter's or der freeing slaves 284 Appeals to Border States 235, 286 Converses with Messrs. Lovejoy and Arnold on eraancipation... 287 Eeplies to Horace Greeley 289 Replies to delegation of Chicago clergy 289, 290 Urged by his friends to emanci pate tbe slaves 291, 292 Issues The Proclamation 294-300 Impatience at McClellan's inac tivity 323, 327, 328 Urges McClellan to more rapid movemunt 326 Telegraphs McClellan on Penin sula that he must strike a blow 327,328 Visits Fortress Monroe 328 Letter to McClellan 329 Replies to McClellan's call for re-enforcements at Harrison's Landing 340, 341 Visits the camp on the James 342 Visits the Army of the Potomac after Antietam 356 Orders McClellan to give bat tle 357,358,359 Message to Congress, December, 1863 '. 369 Points out mischiefs of disunion 371 Eeluotant at using "war pow ers." 391, 392 Suspends Habeas Corpus and Sroelaims Martial Law 392 ;eplies to meeting at Albany... 393 Thanks Grant for capture of Vicksburg 507 Proclaims a day of Thanksgiv ing for the victory of Gettys burg 421, 422 Speech at Gettysburg 423, 424 Appoints a day of Tnanksgiving for victories of Lookout Moun tain and Missionary Bldge 431 Threatens retaliation if rebels treat Union negro soldiers con trary to laws of war 436 Letter to Union men of Illinois... 438-441 Message to Thirty-eighth Con gress 443-446 Views of reconstruction. ...445, 446, 568 Labors for passage of the consti- tional amendment abolishing slavery 468 Insists on fldelity to the freed men 471 Gives his plan of " reconstruc tion " 471 Attends fair of Baltimore Sani tary Commission 494,495 Speaks at the fair in Pliiladel- phia 497 Renominated for the Presidency in 1864 502 Causes of renomination... 497, 498, 499 Addresses General Banks on re construction of Louisiana 510 Thanks Sherman for capture of Atlanta 540 Induced by Horace Greeley to correspond with rebel agents in Canada 556,557 Proposes to Greeley that the Nia gara correspondence be pub lished 558 Suspends Habeas Corpus in Ken- tuck.y 558 Is re-elected President 559 His firm adherence to emancipa tion 560 His last message to Congress.. 562-571 Appoints Secretary Chase Chief Justice of the U. S 574, 575 Speech on passage of Constitu- tional amendment 587 Inadvertently signs it .¦ 588 His early faith in the triumph of abolition ¦;¦ "89 Eefuses to make peace with rebels Inaugurated President 624, 625 His second inaugural address...... d2D, d2o, 0^ Meets generals at City Point 629 Visits Bichmond •¦•.••- °*^ Has a conference with leading citizens of Bichmond... 642, 643, 644 Views of power of Congress over rebel States 2?J"gi His policy ¦.'"^¦;"";"lS Opinion concernmg right of rebel States to vote in the Electoral ^ College "•-.• H ^ Begards loyalty as the basis of reconstruction 2??' iS Views of negro suffrage ^.6.57, 6SS Leaders of the rebellion should be excepted from amnesty......-.- 1»7 Insists on keeping faith with the negroes •'"''¦ •"" 732 INDEX. PAGE. Last day ofhis Ufe 660-663 Assassinated 662; 663 Funeral services 667, 668 Funeral procession from Wash ington to Springfleld 668-672 Funeral oration by Bishop Simp son 672, 673 Lincoln's manners 675 Love of truth 675 Memory. 686 Favorite books 675 Talents as a reader 677 Conversational power 677, 678 Ability as a public spealter 678,679,680 Influence on the national char acter 678 "Household words" 678, 679 Resemblance of his style to Franklin's 680 Tender-heartedness 681 Character of his stories 688 Reception room at White House described 682, 683 His accessibility 684 Magnitude of his labors 685, 686 His cardinal ideas 690 LECOMPTON CONSTITUTION 98 Vote of Kansas on 99 Opposed in United States Senate by Douglas 99 Eemonstrance agaiust by people of Kansas 99 Debate on between Senators Fes senden and Davis 99 Defeated in Congress 100 •LEE, GENERAL EOBEBT E 208-211 Appointed to command of Army of Northern Virginia 334 Appointed commander-in-chief ol rebel armies 621 Surrenders to Grant 634, 635, 636 LIBEBTY PABTY 43 LIBEBTY OF SPEECH AND THE PRESS— Jealously watched by Bepubli cans 489 LOANS- By American people to the Gov ernment durmg the*war 491 LONG, ALEX. OF OHIO— Debate in House of Eepresenta tives on motion to expel 480-489 Censured by House of Represen tatives 489 LOGAN, JOHN A 224 LOUISIANA— Purchased 32 Elects two Union representatives to Congress 386 Debate on admission of 386-390 Emancipation in » 509, 510, 511 New constitution adopted by people of, in 1864 511 LOVEJOY, REV. B. P.— Murder of. 38, 39 LOVEJOY, OWEN 224, 225 Introduces in Congress a resolu tion concerning duty of sol diers touching fugitive slaves... 227, 252, 260 Debate with Crittenden on con fiscation of slaves 273-276 Death 489,490 Lincoln's friendship for 490 LYON, GENERAL— Captures the Missouri "State duard" 201, 202 Death 238 MoCLELLAN, GEOEGE B.- Appolnted commander of Union armies 233 PAaz. Inactivity In 1861-2 807,317 Army of the Potomac 237 Political associations 322 Besieges Yorktown 326 Continued caUs for re-enforce ments 326 Telegraphed by Lincoln that he " must act " 328 Calls for Parrott guns 328 Urged to attack 332 Complains of "mud and rain"..- 334 Fails to take advantage of Lee's blunder in uncovering Bich mond 334,335, 33S Cold Harbor '. 338 Message to Secretary of War 337 Malvern HIU 339 Beturns to Harrison's Landing... 340 Fatal errors during Peninsular campaign 340 Calls for more re-enforcements.340,3S3 Ordered to withdraw to Acquia Creek 345 Delays to re-enforce Pope 346-351 Disobeys orders 351 Determines "to leave Pope to get out of his scrape" 349 Eeappointed commander of tbe Army of the Potomac 353 Tardiness 354 Ordered by the President to give, battle 367, 358, 359 Antietam 359 Believed of his command 360 Nominated at Chicago in 1860 for the Presidency 503 McPHBESON, GBNEBAL- Death of. C 540 MCCULLOCH, HUGH— Placed at head of Bureau of Na tional Currency '. 491 Appointed Secretary of the Treasury MAILS— Violated at South 39 MAYNAED, HOEACE 198, 214, 383 MAEYLAND— Action regarding secession 199 Arrest of the Legislature 242 Slavery abolished in 612, 513, 514 MASON, OF VIEGINIA 54 Captured on board Trent, with Slidell, by Commodore Wilkes. 240 Surrendered to Great Britain 241 MEXICO— War against 36 New Mexico ceded to the United States 37 MISSISSIPPI— ' Opening of the 398 MISSOUBI— Effects of admission as a slave State 33, 34 Action in regard to Secession 201 " State Guard " captured by Gen. Lyon 201 Emancipation In 514, 515, 516 Enthusiam excited by 516 MISSOUBI COMPROMISE 33 Bepeal of. 42-3 Effects of its repeal. 63,64 State of. 201 MITCHELL, GENEEAl^- Address to army at Bowling Green 31C MOBS— Anti-abolition 38, 89 MONITOR— Fights the Merrimac...; 323 MOBGAN'S EAID IN OHIO 410 INDEX. 733 PASS. MULLIGAN, COLONEL- Surrenders to Price 238 NEW ENGLAND— Contrasted with the South 104, 107 NEW YOEK— Eebel plot to burn 660 Prosperity contrasted with that of Virginia. 106, 106, IQT NIAGAEA FALLS— Conference, the 657 NEW OELEANS— Captured by Farragut 317, 318, 319 NOE'TH OABOLINA SECEDEa 198 NORTHWEST, THE— Action regarding the rebellion 195,399 OEDINANCE OP 1787 26 OBDEB OP " THE LONE STAB " 150 PAETY— A new poUtical, organized In the Northwest to oppose slavery.. 92, 93 PEACE CONVENTION— At Washington, In 1860 161, 162 Conference at Hampton Roads 618, 619 PENDLETON, OF OHIO 224 Opposes the expulsion of Alex. Long from. House of Eepresen tatives.- 486,487,488,489 Speaks against the constitution al amendment prohibiting slavery 579 PENINSULAE CAMPAIGN 340 Effects of its faUure on spirits of Northern people 344 PETITION— Bight of, suppressed in Congress 39 Advocated by J. Q. Adams 40 Bestored Iul845 40 PINCKNEY, WM., ON SLAVEEY.... 26 POMEBOY, SENATOR^ Introduces a bUl Into Senate abol- ishlHg slavery in seceding States 272 POPE, GENEBAL— Assumes command of Army of Virginia 343 Addresses his army 343,344 Offends thereby officers of Army of Potomac 344 Asks to be relieved of command.. 344 Driven back 351, 352 Cabal against 352 Acquitted of blame by Lincoln 353 POETEB, GENERAL FITZ JOHN— Convicted of disobedience of or ders 353 PEESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN OF 1856 95 PEOCLAMATION, LINCOLN'S— For 75,000 men 190 EEBELLION- Objects 160,161 Deliberately planned 169, 160 BEBEL, BABBAEITIES 231. 600 Discussed in Senate 600-7 Passage of resolution by Senate concerning 606 BECONSTEUCTION OF BEBEL STATES B^e Debates on admission of repre sentatives to Congress from Louisiana. 386-90 Lincoln's views of. 445,446,470, 471, 476, 507, 508, 509, 510, 620, 650-9 Discussions on in Congress 472-9 Henry Winter Davis' bill con cerning. 473, 474 Passage of by Congress 474 Lincoln's objection to 475 Charles Sumner's views 475, 476 Eesolution of Senate upon 477 Discussion of, in House of Eepre sentatives. in Jan., 1865 506-9 EELIGIOUS SECTS- Oplnionsof slavery in 1785. 28 EEPUBLICAN PABTY— Organized 93 EESOLUTIONS- Of 1788 41 BICHMOND— Captured 642 EOLLINS. BEPEESENTATIVE FEOM MISSOUBI— Advocates the constitutional amendment prohibiting slavery 580,584 SCOTT, GENERAL— Warns Buchanan of designs of secessionists 153 SECESSION- Date of by seceding States 163,197,198 The germ of. 41 Befuted by Webster 42 Buchanan's treatment Contrasted with Jackson's 42 Threatened by South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, &c...: 153 Calhoun on doctrine 153,154 Inexcusable 267 Gloomy winter of 1860-1 197 Condition of affairs March 4, 1861 181, 182 Voted down iu Virginia 196 Successful in 197 Supported by many officers of army and navy 208 Caused by slavery 203,204 Eepudiated by West Virginia 381 SECESSIONISTS— Secret conclave at Washington... 162 Convention at Montgomery, Ala. 163 Seize Harper's Perry and Gos port Navy Yard 202 SEWAED, WM. H 45 Instructions to Mr. Adams 206-7 On capture of Mason and Slidell.. 241 Speaks against 1 Kansas-Nebras ka bin 63 Described 179 Denies right of Federal Govern ment to coerce seceding States 696 697, 698 Deprecates emancipation.. 696, 697, 698 SHEBIDAN, MAJOR GENEBAL PHIL. H 527 T. B. Bead's poem on " Sheridan's Bide " 636, 686 SHEBMAN, SENATOE OF OHIO... 216, 230, 268 Speech on emancipation... 450,451,462 SHEBMAN, MAJOB GENEEAL— Atlanta Campaign 638, 642 Orders the non-combatants to leave Atlanta ••"•• o41 Eeplies to Gen. Hood and the Mayor of Atlanta concerning same 641, 642, 648 644 Grand March ., 646,661 SLAVEBY- ^^ „, „ Opinions of the Fathers on...... 25, 26 Address on by Legislature of Va., to King of Great Britain, 1772 ... ^ Franklin's opinion of ....."....¦¦•••¦•• " When abolished in New England Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey •; J„ Change in public opinion ^« Contrasted with free labor....... 104-10 Position of parties nn m 1860. 149, 16U Tenderly treaieu by U. S. Govern- ment at beginning of war......... 2JJ Debate on abolition in District of 734 INDEX. Columbia 262-228 Abolished in 268 Prohibited by Congress in Terri tories 260 Abolition demanded by the North 288 Statements of Eeverdy Johnson on morality of. 448,449 Propositions in Congress to abol ish and proliibit by amend ment to the U. S. Constitution.. 466 Speeches on same by Trumbull, Wilson, Eeverdy Johnson, Har lan, Saulsbury, McDougal, Hen derson, Pendleton, and Sumner 466 to 468 Vote on same in the Senate 465 Debates in House of Eepresenta tives 466 to 468 and 577 to 687 Votes on 468, 586 First' resolution in Congress to abolish entirely 465 Its final overthrow 692, 693 Power of Congress to abolish in the States 692 to 713 Opinion of Buchanan touching... 694 Vote of Congress on 684,686 SLAVES— Position of Government towards 207, 208 Bil to conflscate when used for insurrectionary purposes.... 225, 226 Flock to the Union armies 226 Military commanders first au thorized to employ them in "^squads, companies" &c 236 Oflicers forbidden to arrest fugi tives 252 Fugitives expelled from the lines of army by Gen. Halleck 261 Permitted by Gen. Hooker to be recaptured 262 Gen. Hunter organizes first regi ment of. 266 Debate in Congress on employ ment as soldiers, 266 to 270 Passage of bill enfranchising such as should perform military ser vice 270 Number killed, wounded, &c., dur ing war, while serving in Union armies 270 Passage, by Congress, of bill free ing all claimed or held by rebels 278 Belief that a day of jubilee was approaching 291 Emancipation proclaimed by Lin coln 294 to ."MO Forgiving spirit towards their masters 558 Opinion of Wm. Whiting, Esq., on right of President to eman cipate 709 Eight of a belligerent to eman- pate 709-12 Practice of England and France in regard to the right, 709,710 Employment of slaves in 1814 by the Government without com pensation 711 SLAVEHOLDEBS— Power of in Congress.. 34 Monopoly of offices by 34 Despotism of 41 Control of the entire Govern ment by 103, 104 SLAVE STATES— 'Tennessee admitted into Union as a slave 3tate 31 Alabama and Mississippi 82 PASZ. SLAVE TEADE— Provision by Congress for Its abolition 27 SMll'H, PEOF. GOLDWIN— On treatment of rebel prisoners by the United States 607 SOLDIEES— Nuraber of fumished for war of the Eebellion by the 'several States 646,617,648 Number of colored troops enlist'd 618 SOUTH CAROLINA— Enacts a law imprisoning colored seamen 40 "The Prodigal Son" ;. 184, 186 Slave.s armed by United States.... 237 STANTON, EDWIN M 165, 266 Appointed Secretary of War. 260 Views of slavery 373 STATES IN EEBELLION— Eight of the United States to govern 716, 723 Decisions of Supreme Court upon 716, 723 Not in the Union during the war 718, 719 Who raay prescribe terms of their retum to the Union 720,721,723 STEPHENS, ALEX. H 62|l66 Speech at Milledgeville 208, 204 STEVENS, THADDEUS— 222, 223, 226, 2S4, 384 Advocates the constitutional araendraent 586, 686 SUMNEE, CHARLES.. 216, 225, 264, 447, 466 Assaulted 65^ Brooks 96 Described 221 Eeviews Lincoln's proclamation respecting government of re volted States 476 Opposes placing bust of Taney in Suprerae Court roora 672, 573, 674 TENNESSEE— Action regarding secession 198 Excepted from proclamation of eraancipation 303 Eraancipation in 611, 612 TANEY, E B 674-6 TEXAS— Adraitted into the Union 38 THOMAS, GEN. GEOEGE H 102 Defeats ZoUikoffer at Mill Spring 308 Defeats the rebels at Franklin and Nashville 647, 648, 649 THOMPSON, JACOB 154 TIMES, THE LONDON— Announces that " The Great Ee public is no more" 206 TOOMBS EOBEET 64 TOUCEY, ISAAC 157 TEEASON— In loyal States 702 TBENT, AFFAIE OF 240, 241 TBUMBULL, SENATOE OF ILLI NOIS 216 Introduces in Senate a bill free ing slaves of rebels 272,467 Protests against President's sig nature of constitutional amend ment bill 588 UNION, THE— Conspiracy of slaveholders, in 1860, todestroy 148, 149 UPEISING OF THE PEOPLE... 192, 198 VALLANDIGHAM 224, 268 Arrested by Burnside 892 Returns North frora rebel lines... 608 Is made chairman of Coraraittee on Eesolutions at Chicago Con vention 608 INDFX. 735 VICKSBUHG 366,7 Captured 407 VIEGINIA— Action regarding secession 196 VOLUNTEERS IN AEMY— Number of 374 WADE, BENJAMIN F 64, 161, 601, 604 WAR OF THE EEBELLION— Federal plan of in 1861-2 306, 307 General movement of army or dered by Lincoln iu January, 1862 308 Battle of Belmont 808 Battle of Mill Spring 308 Capture of Forts Henry and Donelson 309 Kentucky evacuated by the rebels 310 Capture of Nashville 311 Capture of Eoanoke Island, New bern, Fort Pulaski, and Fort Macon 311 Battle of Pea Bidge 311, 312 NewMadrid and Island No. 10 812 Battle of Shiloh 313, 314, 816 Capture of Corinth Slti Plan of operations agreed on at Fairfax Court House, March, 1862 324 Lincoln's dispatch to comman ders conceming same 326 Yorktown 326 Williamsburg 826 Capture of Norfolk 828 Cold Harbor, or Gaines'Mill 336 Savage Station .388 Malvern Hill 8.39 Battle of South Mountain 854 Loss of Harper's Ferry 362 Battle of Antietam 364, 365 Battle of Fredericksburg. 364 Eeview of campaign of 1862 in tlie East 364, 365 Bebels occupy Frankfort and Lexington, Ky 364 Battle of Perryville 364 Repulse of Van Dorn by Bose- crans 366 Surrender of Holly Springs 366 Vicksburg unsuccessfully as saulted by Sherman and Mc Clernand 367 Battle of Stone Eiver 367 Plan of campaign bf 1863 400 Capture of Vicksburg 400-407 Arkansas Post 401 Battle of Port Gibson 405 Grierson's raid 408, 409, 4io Morgan's raid in Ohio 410 Capture of Port Hudson 410, 411 Battle of Chancellorville.. 411, 412, 413 Lee's invasion of Pennsylvania... 413 Battle of Gettysburg 414-420 Meade's failure to pursue Lee 426 Eosecrans forces back Bragg to Chattanooga 427 Burnside occupies East Tennes see 428 Battle of Chickamaugua 428,429 Graflt takes command of the De partments of Tennessee, the Cumberland and Ohio 430 Battles of Lookout Mountain and Missionary Bidge 430, 481 Operations against Charleston 431,482 Assault on Fort Wogner 431 Quantrell's massacre at Lawrence 432 First draft by the President... 432, 4.33 Draft riots in New York 438, 434 Recruiting of negro soldiers.. 434,435 Desperation of rebels at close of 1863 43X •• Military situation when Grant took coramand of all United States armies 522 Failure of Banks' Bed River ex pedition... 623 Massacre at Fort Pillow 623, 624 Exhaustion of the rebels 634, 636 They propose to arm their slaves.. 526 The Army of the Potomac cross the Bapidan 527 Battles of tlie Wilderness 528 Sheridan's raid 529 Gen. Butler occupies City Point and Bermuda Hundred 629, 630 Butler is forced back 630 Battles of Spottsylvania, Nortii Anna, etc 680, 681 First attack on Petersburg 231 Operations on the Shenandoah by Sigel and Hunter 631 Investment of Lynchburg 631 Early and Breckenridge move down the Shenandoah and threaten Washington 632 Eetreat of same 682 Petersburg invested 633 A raine exploded 534 Sheridan takes command of the Department of Washington and the Shenandoali 634 Defeat of General Early 634 Second defeat of Early by Slieri- dan 586 Sherman advances on Atlanta 63-, 689 He turns the enemy's position at Kenesaw Mountain 539 Death of McPherson 640 Atlanta evacuated 540 Sherraan orders non-combatants to leave 541 Sherman proposes to raarch across Georgia to the sea 545 Corresponds with Grant concern ing sarae 545, 546 General Thoraas prepares to raeet Hood 546, 547 Battle of Franklin 547, 548 Battle of Nashville 548, 649 Defence of Allatoona Pass 560 Sherman marches to the sea, and invests Savannah 661, 652 Capture of the Alabaraa 653, 564 Capture of the Florida 654 Farragut's victory at Mobile.. 554, 655 Bebel barbarities 606-607 Attacks on Fort Fisher *''''5}5 Capture of same... "is Capture of Wilmington 021 The rebels arm the negroes oai Fight at BentonvUle 022 Sheiman joins Terry and Scho- fleld "22 Capture of Charleston ••••• 622 Sheridan at Five Forks 631, 6B.i General assault upon Lee's lines at Petersburg •••¦• «i' Grant's pursuitof Lee 633, 634 Lee's surrender t)34, 63o 636 Dissatisfaction of the people at terms of same ''"°. ''¦'' Armistice between Sherman .and Johnson ¦ :u""Jr' Bepudiation of same by the Pie- sident '^''«*? Surrender of Johnston's army.-.. Ml Downfall of the Confederacy 6*1 Capture ot Jefferson DavJS 641 Weitzel's entry into Richmond... 642 736 INDEX. PAGE. Review of Grant and Sherman's troops at Washington 644, 645 Cost of the war 646 Number of troops furnished by the several States 646 647 Number of colored troops enlisted 648 Forbearance of the victors 649 Heroism of rebels 649 Constitutional history of the war 691-726 What has been settled by the war 722, 723 WAE POWERS— Of the government 691-725 Treatise on by William Whit ing, Esq 708 Extracts from same 704-709 . Opinions of J. Q,. Adams con cerning 711, 712, 723 WASHBUENE, ELIHU B. OF ILLI NOIS— Eeplies to Cox 676,676 Speech on Grant 402, 403 Moves to expel Harris 481 WASHINGTON, PBESIDENT— Views of slavery 26 WASHINGTON CITY— Plot to seize 20O WHAENCLIFFE, LOED— Eefused access to Confederate prisons 606, 607 ¦WHITING, WM., OF BOSTON— Appointed Solicitor of the War Department 7P8 Publishes a treatise on " War Powers " 708 Extracts from same 704-709 WEST VIEGINIA 881 Eebels driven from 2.38 Admitted into Union 885 Debate in Congress on same.....382-386 Abolishes slavery 386 WICKLIFFE, C. A 268, 268 WIDE-AWAKES 147 Addressed at Chicago 147, 148 WILMOT PBOVISO 886 WILSON, HENBY 215,253 Speeches of 266,270,375,376, 380, 469