YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ..J ©MIT WE£-'ILS!l?v £ rbtufit.&%nt&- o ECCLESIASTICAL BIOGRAPHY; OR, LIVES OF EMINENT MEN, CONNECTED WITH Till! HISTORY OF RELIGION IN ENGLAND; FROM TIIE COMMENCEMENT OF THE REFORMATION TO THE REVOLUTION ; SELECTED AND ILLUSTRATED WITH NOTES, BY CHRISTOPHER WORDSWORTH, D.D. I.ATE MASTER OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, AND RECTOR OF EUXTED, WITH UCKI'IELI), SUSSEX. dfourtS CEifttton, WITH MANY ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES IN FOUR VOLUMES. VOL. I. LONDON: FKANCIS & JOHN EIVING-TON, st. paul's church yard, and Waterloo place. 1853. LONDON : gilbert and rivington, printers, st. John's square. G-5 ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION. This Third Edition differs from the two preceding, in the way both of addition, and of omission. Of omissions of any considerable moment, there is only one. The Life of Philip Henry, which constituted a large portion of the sixth volume of the former editions, has been withdrawn. The length of this Life had been occasionally complained of, as hardly compensated by a proportionate degree of value and in terest ; and sometimes it was alleged, that some degree of incon gruity and unsuitableness to the leading, general design of the Collection, was introduced by the circumstance of the longest piece in the whole work being an encomiastic account of a non conformist minister. After all, however, the consideration which weighed most on the Editor's own mind, was, that since his former publication, a new edition of the Life in question has ap peared, revised, &c. from the original Diary, under the following title, viz. The Life ofthe Rev. Philip Henry, A.M., &c. corrected and enlarged, ly J. B. Williams, F.S.A. London, 1825. 8vo. After the appearance of the narrative in this revised and aug mented form, it seemed that it would be neither respectful to the public, nor just to any of the other parties concerned, to re publish merely the old edition, which wanted the accessions and improvements introduced by the new Editor : it was thought best, a 2 iv ADVERTISEMENT TO therefore, to abandon this portion of the series entirely ; it being left to any of my readers, who may think the deficiency serious, to make it good, by the separate purchase of Mr. Williams's new and extended edition. The additions, introduced in this Third Edition, consist partly of additions to the text, and partly to the notes. The new Lives adopted are only two. The first a short account of Dean Oolet, founder of St. Paul's School, consisting of ex tracts, brought together from sundry Letters of Colet's friend, Erasmus : and the other is an interesting narrative by himself, of the troubles of Thomas Mountain, a London clergyman, pub lished by Strype from Fox's Papers. It is introduced as forming a suitable connecting link between the persecutions of the reign of Mary, and the re-establishment of the Reformed Catholic Church of England under Elizabeth. But much the most important addition to the body of the text, is a two-fold Introduction of considerable extent, at the opening of the first volume. It is divided into two main portions ; the former of which may be characterized generally as an historical narrative of the origin and progress of the Papal usurpations and corruptions in England both in Church and State, and is derived from Dr. John Inetfs Church History. The latter, borrowed from Dr. Richard Bentley's famous Fifth of November sermon, I have entitled "Doctrinal Corruptions of Popery." The two former editions wanting any such Introduction as is now referred to, and opening abruptly with the Life of Wickliffe ; I have long felt that my Reader, without any fault of his own, was thus placed in a somewhat fallacious and injurious position, in finding his sympathies enlisted in behalf of a party, strenuously THE THIRD EDITION. v opposed to the governors of the established Church of that age (and oftentimes in opposition also to those of the State), without being put in possession of any sufficient account how this con dition of things had arisen, and without receiving any adequate exposition of the motives and principles by which either those governors of the Church, or the mal-content party (Wickliffe and his followers) themselves, were actuated. By leading my Reader back to the ancient and primitive condition of the Church of England, and thence guiding him along in rapid progress down to the age of Wickliffe, through a short, but sufficiently copious, and at the same time a not uninteresting recital of the lamentable degeneracy, gradually introduced by the usurpation and tyranny of the Church of Rome, it seemed that my Reader would be led naturally and easily to comprehend the true nature of the prin ciples (in many important respects grossly delusive and erroneous) upon which the rulers of the Church sought to maintain them selves against the arguments and efforts of the mal-contents : and that he would be better qualified to discern and distinguish between what was right and what was wrong in the principles and conduct of the Reformers ; and so learn also occasionally to look with a degree of pardonable indulgence upon the incidental aberrations of those eminent persons, the early champions of respiring freedom and truth, who though baffled and discomfited for several successive generations, were in fact, in many main respects, no other than the fore-runners and fore-fathers in Christ, of Cranmer, Ridley, Latimer, and the rest, the great successful champions, under Providence, of the English Reforma tion ; were, in fact, no other than that which the Reformed Catholic Church of England herself, through much conflict, at length gradually became under Henry VIII., Edward VI., and vi ADVERTISEMENT TO THE THIRD EDITION. finally under Q. Elizabeth : then, I say, became, through Cod's mercy, and still subsists by the same mercy ; and still, we trust, will continue to subsist, the noblest branch of the true Catholic Church of Christ ; the guardian, keeper, and nurse of all genuine intellectual, moral, civil, and spiritual truth and freedom, in equal opposition to the modern corruptions, whether of the tyranny and despotism of the Church of Rome, or of the insubordination and anarchy of Puritans, Rationalists, and Sectarians. The additions to the notes, throughout the whole work, are numerous ; and the Editor hopes that the length of many of those which are new, will be compensated by the value, which they will be thought to give to his Collection. The Index, also, has been largely augmented. With respect to the size and dimensions of the Work, it is not necessary to say more, than that the six volumes of the preceding editions are compressed into four in the present ; and that the Work, in its external appearance and qualities, is conformed elosely to the Editor's Christian Institutes ; in the hope, also, that in many higher respects they may be found suitable companions and associates; and may mutually conspire and co-operate in carrying into effect the Editor's main design in the compilation of them both, the advancement of the religious portion of a liberal education of the middle and upper classes of society, according to the principles of the Church of England. For numerous and valuable suggestions, in the way both of correction of and addition to the Notes, while the edition was passing through the press, I am bound to acknowledge myself very greatly indebted to John Holmes, Esq., of the British Museum. Trinity College, Cambridge, June 1, 1839. ADVERTISEMENT FOURTH EDITION. This Fourth Edition is still further indebted to the kind and valuable assistance of the same Gentleman who is named at the conclusion of the foregoing Advertisement. The un abated interest which he has continued to take in the Work, has been shewn by the contribution of many new Historical and Biographical Notes, such as could only have proceeded from one who is deeply versed in all kinds of literary and antiquarian lore. For the accession of so much interesting and useful matter which has thus been made to these Volumes, the Pro prietors, upon whom has devolved the duty of conducting them through the press, desire to return their sincere and grateful acknowledgments. February, 1853. TO THE MOST REVEREND CHARLES, BY DIVINE PROVIDENCE, LORD ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY, PRIMATE OF ALL ENGLAND AND METROPOLITAN. My Loud, If I were disposed to consider the value of that portion of these volumes, which is the result of my own labour, I could not but feel that the laying them at your Grace's feet would constitute a most inadequate acknowledgment of the gratitude which I owe to your Grace for many very great favours and benefits conferred upon me. In this view, there could be only one consolatory circumstance to sustain me ; the knowledge that to you the homage of all my efforts is due, be they great or little : and he therefore who is already engaged for all, may seem to be released from the necessity of satisfying himself of the worthiness of any particular offering. But, my Lord, there are considerations of a different nature, from which I may be permitted to tender these volumes to your Grace's favourable regard, without the hazard of being thought x DEDICATION. so ill to understand the nature and extent of my own obligations, and the dignity of your Grace's name. Many of the Lives, of which this Collection is composed, have already often obtained the praise of the wise and good, as calcu lated to promote, in a more than ordinary degree, the cause of pure taste, good morals, and true religion; objects of infinite importance, for the prosperity of which, they who well know your Grace's unceasing cares and labours, may be excused if they bear testimony, that every endeavour to extend those great blessings, has a peculiar title to come forth under your Grace's protection. The tendency which has been thus attributed to many of these Lives individually, it was my hope would not be impaired, but augmented, by combining them into one series, and by the addi tion of the few illustrations with which they are here accompa nied. If therefore I have not been deceived in this expectation, I cannot deny to myself the pleasing assurance, that the present Publication will be received by your Grace as an effort not uncongenial to your wishes, and, in however low a degree, sub ordinate to your own cares ; and, as having afforded therefore a not unsuitable engagement of a portion of such intervals of leisure, as I may have been able to obtain consistently with the demands of your Grace's more immediate service, and of pastoral labours. Again : This likewise is to be acknowledged, that it is owing to your Grace not only that these Volumes exist at all, but also that they exist such as they are. All that is new in them comes by your Grace's liberality and public spirit. Whatever pleasure then or profit any of my readers may receive, especially DEDICATION. xi from this part of my materials, it is fit that they should know that from the Archbishop of Canterbury the benefit is derived. And, at the same time, let it be further declared, that this is but a very humble instance of that love of good letters, and that public spirit, which have prompted your Grace to the exertion of many acts of munificence, for the increase of the literary treasures of your country, which exalt your Grace's name to the same level with those of the most illustrious of your predecessors, Cranmer, and Parker, and Laud. That your Grace's labours for the welfare of the Church of God may long be blessed with abundant fruits of righteousness and peace, is the earnest prayer of My Lord, your Grace's most devoted, faithful and humble Servant, CHRISTOPHER WORDSWORTH. Lambeth, Nov. 22, 1809. PREFACE. The first wishes for the existence of a collection, similar in design to that which now appears, were excited in my mind not less than ten years ago, and often recurred to it, during a resi dence in the University of Cambridge ; though I do not remember to have entertained, then, any very confident expectations, that the work would ever be undertaken by myself. But when, after the expiration of something more than half the above-named period of years, I had been called to Lambeth, to the service of his Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury, and, in process of time, the probable advantages of such a collection appeared continually to my mind, rather to increase, than to be diminished ; and when some efforts which I had made to bring about the execution of this design, from another quarter, on a contracted scale, had yet produced no effect, I determined to turn my own hands to the work : — and it now becomes my duty to state the views and motives upon which it was begun, and the way and manner in which it has been performed. The mention, in the outset, of the places where the wish for the existence of this work was first conceived, and where it has been prepared for publication, I judge not to be impertinent, because these circum stances may probably have had a considerable influence on its contents and character ; and therefore the knowledge of them may lead the reader, by a natural and easy progress, to a further explanation of the principles on which it has been compiled. A protracted residence in either of our Universities, and PREFACE. xiii afterwards in that service which I have mentioned, it will easily be understood, was likely to engage any man in ardent wishes and desires for the general prosperity and welfare of sincere piety and true religion : and to inspire him more particularly with an honest concern that those most important interests should ever advance and flourish among our theological students and the clergy ; and through their means and labours, with the divine blessing, in every rank of society. It appeared then, to the present writer, that there were extant, among the literary productions of our country, many scattered narratives of the lives of men eminent for piety, sufferings, learning, and such other virtues, or such vices, as render their possessors interesting and profitable subjects for history, many of which were very difficult to be procured, and some of them little known ; and that, therefore, the benefit which might have been expected to result from their influence, was in a great degree lost. These I thought it inight be a labour well-bestowed to restore to a capacity of more extensive usefulness, and to repub lish them in one collection ; not merely with a view of affording to many readers an opportunity of possessing what they could not otherwise enjoy ; but also from the hopes, that the serviceable effect of each might be increased by their union and juxtaposi tion ; and that, through the help of a chronological arrangement, a species of ecclesiastical history might result, which though un doubtedly very imperfect, might yet answer, even in that view, several valuable purposes ; while it would possess some peculiar charms and recommendations. A scheme of this nature, it is easy to conceive, could not well be undertaken without many limitations. Besides those obvious ones of restricting the history to that of our own country, and to the lives of our fellow countrymen, there appeared to me many reasons, why the work should begin with the preparations towards a Reformation by the labours of Wickliffe and his followers, and not a few why it might well stop at the Revolution. Within those limits are comprehended, if we except the first establish ment of Christianity, and the growth of the papal power amongst xiv PREFACE. us, the rise, progress, and issue of the principal agitations and re volutions of the public mind of this country in regard to matters of Religion :— namely, the Reformation from Popery, and the glories and horrors attending that hard-fought struggle; the subsequent exorbitancies and outrages of the Antipopish spirit, as exemplified by the Puritans ; the victory of that spirit, in ill- suited alliance with the principles of civil liberty, over loyalty and the established church, in the times of Charles the first ; the wretched systems and practices of the sectaries, during the Com monwealth, and the contests for establishment between the Pres byterians and Independents at the same period; the hasty return of the nation, weary and sick of the long reign of con fusion, to the antient constitution of things, at the Restoration ; the operation of those confusions, and of the ill-disciplined triumph of a portion of the adverse party upon the state of morals and religion, during the early part of the reign of the second Charles ; the endeavours of Charles and his brother to restore Popery, and introduce despotism ; the noble exertions of the clergy of the church of England, at that interval, in behalf of natural and revealed religion, and protestantism, and civil liberty ; the Revolution of 1 688, together with the ascertainment of the distinct nature and rights of an established church, and a religious toleration ; and the principles of the Non-jurors. A narrative of these grand particulars, together with many others of inferior moment, obtained in connexion with a descrip tion of the virtues, private life, and character of the agents principally concerned in them would, I thought, be considerably interesting and useful, and especially in regard to those objects which I have above referred to ; without descending to later times, less productive in some respects than the preceding, and more so indeed in others, but on both accounts the less fitted to constitute any part of this design. At the Revolution, a degree of stability was given both to our ecclesiastical and civil esta blishments, which they never before possessed ; and hence a great part of the age which followed was less fertile, at least in historical interest : and from that sera, the growing abundance PREFACE. xv and extent of biographical memoirs, were felt, of themselves, as a discouragement against attempting the admission of any portion of them into a collection like the present. It was no part of my original plan to go in quest of any thing new, but merely to revive the old. Yet, when his grace the Archbishop of Canterbury generously gave me permission to avail myself of the stores contained in the manuscripts in the Archiepiscopal Library at Lambeth, I could not forbear, in justice to that liberality, to exert such a further portion of industry, as might seem best calculated to increase the value and usefulness of my publication. For this reason, and from this source, the reader will find here a copious Life of Sir Thomas More, never before published ; a new edition of Caven dish's Life of Cardinal Wolsey, so much surpassing in value those which have preceded it, as almost to deserve the name of a new work ; and some large and interesting additions to the Memoirs of the Nicholas Ferrars ; besides many occasional extracts inserted in the notes : for all which I desire in this place to return humble thanks to my most honoured Patron. That which occasioned me the greatest labour and difficulty, with regard to the remainder of my materials, was the laying in the first stores, and afterwards making a selection out of them. The contents of these volumes are but a very small part of what I have gathered together, not without a considerable expence of time and pains. From the same heap, another man perhaps would have made now and then a different choice. But the prin ciples upon which I proceeded will, I trust, be made sufficiently apparent to my readers in the course of this preface : further I have nothing to say, but that, proceeding upon those which I judge the best principles, I made the selection the best I could. It will be found (for which I imagine no apology is necessary), that I have preferred the ancient and original authorities, where they could be procured, before modern compilations and abridg ments ; the narratives, for instance, of Fox and Carleton, before the more artificial compositions of Gilpin. xvi PREFACE. Neither do I think that it will require any excuse with the judicious reader, that in the early parts of the series, I have been at some pains to retain the ancient orthography. It was one advantage which I contemplated in projecting this compilation, that it would afford, by the way, some view of the progress of the English language, and of English composition. This benefit would have been greatly impaired by taking away the old spelling. But I have always thought that the far more solemn interests of historic reality, and of truth, are also in a degree, violated by that practice. The reader is desired further to observe, that in many cases the Lives are republished from the originals, entire, and without alteration ; but in others, the method pursued has been different. Wherever the work before me seemed to possess a distinct character as such, either for the beauty of its composition, the conveniency of its size, its scarcity, or any other sufficient cause, I was desirous that my reader should have the satisfaction of possessing it complete : but where these reasons did not exist, I have not scrupled occasionally to proceed otherwise : only, in regard to alterations, it is to be understood, that all which I have taken the liberty of making are confined solely to omissions. Thus, the Lives written by Isaac Walton, are given entire ; but the accounts of Ferrar and Tillotson have been shortened. Many of the Lives which are given from Fox's Acts and Monuments1, and which the Editor looks upon as among the most valuable parts of his volumes, are brought together and compiled from distant and disjointed parts of that very extensive work; a circumstance of which it is necessary that any one should be informed, who may wish to compare these narratives with the originals. It will be found also, that in many places much has been omitted ; and that a liberty has not unfrequently been taken of leaving out clauses of particular sentences, and single coarse and gross terms and expressions, especially such as occurred against Papists. But, here also, though he has not all Fox laid before him, yet the reader may be assured that all which he has is Fox. 1 The edition followed is that ofthe year 1610. PREFACE. xvii In the Notes which I have added, my aim has been occa sionally to correct my Author; but much more frequently to enforce his positions, and illustrate him, and that especially in matters relating to doctrines, opinions, manners, language, and characters. Their number might easily have been increased, but I was unwilling to distract the reader's eye from the object before him, except where I thought some salutary purpose might be answered. Where the notes are designated by letters, a, b, c, &c. or are inserted between brackets ( [] ), it is to be understood, that they are not the Editor's, but are derived from the same source as the text. Upon the whole then, my desire has been to bring forward in the way, and by the means which I have stated, a work which might deserve some humble station in the same rank with those produc tions which have been found to benefit the high and holy cause of pure taste, and virtue, and piety. It is presumed that this object may in some degree have been obtained, by the examples which will be found here recorded, and the manner in which the several narratives are told, of patient enduring of affliction for conscience1 sake ; of suffering even to bonds and imprisonment, and death itself, in the cause of the everlasting Gospel ; of stedfast labour and perseverance in the various duties and good works of many several callings and stations in society : of the successive stages, and the vicissitudes of the progress of the Christian life, from its first beginnings in the grace and mercy of God, to its earthly consummation in a peaceful happy death : — and, on the other hand, by the contrast, which will be found occasionally manifested and displayed, in the goings on and the fate of error and vice, and earthly-mindedness. From the multitude of secular concerns which press upon us on every side, we have all continual need to be called to the contemplation of the things of the future world, and to be reminded that this life is chiefly important because of its connexion with the other. My hope is, that the histories of life and death, here delivered into the hand of my reader, may bring some aid to the side of those salutary impres sions. vol. i. a xviii PREFACE. If it be likewise thought that the Editor has been influenced by a further aim and desire to promote the interests of religion and piety, especially as they are professed within the pale of the church of England, the surmise, he confesses, is well-grounded ; and it will greatly add to whatever satisfaction he looks for from his labour, if he shall find that it has indeed operated to that effect : for he is persuaded that whatever is gained in that cause, is gained in the way which is most likely to secure and serve " the edifying of the body of Christ in love." And yet, if he could any where have found Popery associated with greater piety and heavenly-mindedness than in Sir Thomas More, or non-con formity united with more eminent gifts than in Richard Baxter, those examples also should have obtained their station in this work, for the honour of God, for doctrine, for reproof, for instruc tion in righteousness. It has then been no part of my design to give occasion of offence to any. If indeed occasion be taken, where none was intended to be given ; if the errors and the evil practices of popery, the truths of Protestantism, the sufferings of martyrs and confessors, and the intolerance and cruelty of persecutors; if the madness of fanatics, and the evils of civil and religious war, cannot be de scribed and deplored without blame ; if the wisdom to be derived to present and future ages from the records of the past cannot be obtained by ourselves, without exciting displeasure in other bosoms ; there may be circumstances which shall call forth our concern and sorrow for the pain of a suffering fellow-creature ; but the consequences must be endured, as no part of our design, but only accidental to it ; and the complainant may bear to be admonished, whether, instead of casting harsh imputations upon us, he would not be better employed in re-examining the grounds and principles of his own faith, and enquiring whether all which has been done in what he blames is not that cause hath been afforded to him of rendering thanks and praise to the mercy of God, for giving him another call and summons to escape from error, and forsake his sin. PREFACE. xix But the Editor can make no apology for the large space which is occupied in his history by the popish controversy, either in regard to the views of politicians, or of Romish controversialists. I am well aware that by the extent to which I have availed myself of Fox's Acts and Monuments, I fall within the range of such censures as that of Dr. John Milner, in which he speaks of " the frequent publication of John Fox's lying book of Martyrs, with prints of men, women, and children expiring in flames ; the nonsense, inconsistency, and falsehoods of which (he says) he had in part exposed in his Letters to a Prebendary." I am not igno rant of what has been said also by Dr. J. Milner's predecessors in the same argument, by Harpsfield, Parsons, and others. But neither his writings nor theirs, have proved, and it never will be proved, that John Fox is not one of the most faithful and au thentic of all historians. We know too much of the strength of Fox's book, and of the weakness of those of his Romish ad versaries, to be further moved by Dr. John Milner's censures, than to reject them as grossly exaggerated, and almost entirely unsubstantial and groundless. All the many researches and dis coveries of later times, in regard to historical documents, by Burnet, Strype, and many others, have only contributed to place the general fidelity and truth of Fox's melancholy narrative on a rock which cannot be shaken. After all, the object nearest to the Editor's heart in compiling this collection, has been, as he has already intimated, to consult the benefit of the theological students in the universities, and the younger clergy. Lambeth, Nov. 20, 1809. a 2 POSTSCRIPT. I have yet occasion to request the reader's attention, shortly, to another very different subject. In the year 1802, I published " Six Letters to Granville Sharp, Esq. respecting his Remarks on the Uses of the Definitive Ar ticle, in the Greek Text of the New Testament." 8vo. Riving- tons. Much has been said and written for and against that pub lication. It would be wrong, therefore, if I were to suffer the present opportunity to pass by, without adverting to those no tices ; at least, without stating whether any alteration of judg ment has been produced in my mind, respecting the argument attempted in the " Six Letters," by the many censures and ani madversions under which those " Letters " have fallen. I am by no means certain, that a cause of very solemn importance may not, in a degree, have suffered, by an aversion to controversy, and an opinion of the little account due to my adversaries, which have kept me so long silent. But had it been true, that the " Six Letters" had obtained a much smaller share of the public notice, either for praise or blame, than indeed they have, it could not but be fit, that I should state occasionally what may be the present bearings and estimate of my own mind, respecting the value and truth of the argument once seriously brought forward by me, in those Let ters ; whether my confidence in its stability may have been, by any means, in the interval, materially increased or diminished ; an argument, the more interesting, at least for its assumed rela tion to an article of our Christian faith, of primary and funda mental importance. In the year 1 803, the Six Letters were followed by " Six more Letters to Granville Sharp, Esq. on his Remarks upon the uses of the Article in the Greek Testament, by Gregory Blunt, Esq." POSTSCRIPT. xxi Svo. Johnson. I thought it sufficient to notice that work by the following Letter, addressed to its Author, which appeared in the month of June of that year, in one or two of the periodical publications. By recording the Letter in this place, I mean it to be understood, that I still retain the same sentiments, respecting the " Six more Letters," which I have therein expressed. To the Author of Six more Letters to Granville Sharp, Esq. Sir, The many observations which you have bestowed upon my " Six Letters to Granville Sharp, Esq." in your " Six more Letters " to that gentleman, may seem to give to my readers, and I have no great objection to say that they give to you, some claim to be informed what impressions have been made on my mind by your animadversions. Your Letters then, in the first place, have in no degree lessened my opinion of the truth of Mr. Sharp^s Rule, and of the value and importance of that discovery. It is, however, a disappoint ment to me, that I cannot go further ; that I cannot proceed to say, that your researches have contributed to give additional evidence and stability to Mr. Sharp's theory; an event which might perhaps have followed, had that theory found a more learned and more logical adversary. But, with regard to my own more particular concerns, (I speak it, not without due deliberation, and well knowing what I say,) in my judgment, you have not shewn, that I have been guilty of any error, of any misrepresentation, of any false reasoning, whether great or small, one instance of inadvertency alone excepted. It appears, that in an extract from St. Cyril of Alexandria, (Six Letters, page 10,) I have inserted the article tov before ^gio-rov, which does not exist in the printed text from which I quoted. In offering our acknowledgments for a favour conferred, it is justly accounted unpolite to extenuate that favour, and to shew how small is its value. For this detection, therefore, I beg leave, without interposing any reserve or demur, to return you my xxii POSTSCRIPT. thanks. But this is all. In every other respect I maintain what I have written, (so far, I mean, as it has been assailed by you,) without exception or relaxation; and in no other point am I enabled to profess my obligations to you for any new stores or materials which may contribute in any way to the decision of the important subject of our respective lucubrations. Again : with so little to retract, I feel also very little inclina tion to recriminate ; to shew what you have, or what you have not done ; to point out your deficiencies, errors, misrepresenta tions, and inconsistencies. I think indeed, that they are, all of them, both very great and very numerous. But you have hinted to us, that you write not for incompetent readers. " I am not writing," you say, "for school-boys." If babes and boys do not read your book, I shall be well contented to leave you to the judgment and censure of others. If men are to be your readers, I can have little concern or solicitude about them. After these observations, it can hardly be necessary, otherwise than for the sake of method, that I should subjoin the conclusion to which they were intended to lead; namely, that, unless I should be called to reconsider, defend, or retract what I have written in my " Six Letters " by some more respectable antago nist, it is not my purpose to take any further notice of your pamphlet. I am, Sir, Your very obedient and humble servant, The Author of Six Letters to Granville Sharp, Esq. In the year 1805, the subject was further prosecuted from the press, by " A Vindication of certain passages in the common English Version of the New Testament, addressed to Granville Sharp, Esq. by the Rev. Calvin Winstanley, A.M." 12mo. Long man. Among many important mistakes, and misinterpretations of writers referred to, from which it might be easily shewn, (as it has been very sufficiently in one of our Monthly Journals, the British Critic, for May, 1808,) that the value attributed by Mr. POSTSCRIPT. xxiii Winstanley to his labours originated principally in his own mis takes and misinterpretations, it may yet be conceded, that Mr. Winstanley has effected more than any other writer that has yet appeared against Mr. Sharp's theory ; not that I apprehend he has, in the slightest degree, affected its truth or stability ; but, in one or two particulars, his observations may perhaps tend a little to help his readers to a clearer understanding, and a more distinct enunciation of that theory. With regard to the " Six Letters " of the present writer, Mr. Winstanley condemns them as of little value. But then, many will think that he supplies us with a criterion whereby we must be led to reckon not very highly of the value of this particular censure, not very favourably of his general judgment, when he tells us, that the book which he con demns he had never seen. After all, Mr. Winstanley's tract will not have been without its good effects. The publication has, doubtless, extended the knowledge of the matter in dispute ; and it will have tended, I trust, to fix his own mind more closely to his object ; and to impress him with higher notions of its im portance and difficulty. Let him permit me then to invite him, with sentiments of considerable respect, and as a sincere fellow- labourer in the search of truth, which I doubt not but that he really is, to renew his efforts, to persevere in his undertaking, and to continue to communicate, either publicly or privately, the result of his researches. In regard to such things as have been said or written, and not printed, against the " Six Letters," and the argument contained in them, it may be not unfit to be mentioned, that where the knowledge of their existence has reached me, I have not been backward (as the persons concerned could, if they pleased, testify), in seeking to obtain a communication of those sentiments and reasonings. It is not less true, however, that I have found, in more instances than one, a readiness to speak or write against the "Six Letters" and their Author, where there existed none to impart to himself a knowledge of the things objected against. As a personal concern, I should have much preferred to have passed this matter by in silence ; but the justice due to a serious argu- xxiv POSTSCRIPT ment connected with a very solemn subject, demands that I should not altogether hold my peace. The testimonies which have been given both in public and private, to the value and importance ofthe " Six Letters" have been exceedingly numerous. But upon these I have no disposition to enlarge. I have always been much more solicitous to seek for arguments against my labours upon this subject, than for com mendations of them. But this consideration must not withhold me from earnestly recommending to the notice of those who wish to prosecute the present enquiry respecting the theory of the Greek Article, the learned and elaborate work of Dr. Middleton on that subject. 8vo. Cadell. Upon the whole then I desire it to be understood, that the general argument respecting the true interpretation of certain important texts in the New Testament, as it is comprised in the " Six Letters," has hitherto, in my judgment, been in no respect impaired by any thing which I have seen alleged on the other side. Let it be further understood, that I hereby earnestly invite either the public or private communication of any objections against it ; That I beg respectfully to suggest, that no man can well be more laudably employed than in endeavouring to rescue any doc trine of our religion from the rash attempts of injudicious men to support it by false and untenable arguments ; And, finally, that I hereby pledge myself to retract publicly what I have written in my "Six Letters," so soon as I shall be convinced, either by my own researches, or those of others, that what I have there written is justly liable to that imputation. Nov. 20, 1809. P. S. June 1, 1839. Nothing has occurred to the Editor, since his last communications on this subject, to impair, in the slightest degree, his confidence in the conclusions, assumed to have been obtained in prosecuting the investigation above referred to. When the keepers of the field slept, and the enemy had sown tares, and they had choked the wheat, and almost destroyed it : when the world com plained of the infinite errors in the church, and being oppressed by a violent power, durst not complain so much as they had cause ; and when they who had cause to complain, were yet themselves very much abased, and did not complain in all they might ; when divers excellent persons, St. Bernard, Clemangis, Grosthead, Marsilius, and pope Adrian himself, with many others, not to reckon Wickliffe, Hus, Hierome of Prague, the Bohemians, and the poor men of Lyons, whom they called heretics, and confuted with fire and sword; when almost all Christian princes did complain heavily of the corrupt state of the church, and of religion, and no remedy could be had, but the very intended remedy made things much worse: then it was that divers Christian kingdoms, and particularly the church of England, being ashamed of the errors, superstitions, heresies, and impieties which had deturpated the face of the church, looked into the glass of Scripture and pure antiquity, and washed away those stains, with which time, and inadvertency, and tyranny had besmeared her ; and, being thus cleansed, and washed, is accused by the Roman parties of novelty, and condemned because she refuses to run into the same excess of riot and deordination. — But we cannot deserve blame who return to our ancient and first health, by preferring a new cure before an old sore. Bishop Taylor. CONTENTS. VOL. I. PAGE 1. Introduction. The British Church and the Anglican . Inett. 1 II. . King Henry II. ; and Archbishop Becket. Inett. 29 III. . National Churches. — Papal Usurpations on the Rights of the Civil Government Inett. 59 IV. — . King John, the Barons, and Pope Innocent the Third Inett. 77 V. . Papal Usurpations in Church and State : Origin and Progress of. — General Recapitulation Inett. 132 VI. . Doctrinal Corruptions of Popery . . Bentley. 147 VII. John Wickliffe Fox. 165 VIII. William Thorpe Fox. 259 IX. Lord Cobham Fox. 351 X. Supplementary Extracts. — Invention of Printing. — Chaucer and Gower. — Progress of Reformation and of Persecution. — Martin Luther Fox. 403 XI. Dean Colet (from the Phoenix) Erasmus. 433 XII. Cardinal Wolsey, by Cavendish, his Gentleman Usher : a New and complete edition, from Manuscripts in the Lambeth and other Libraries 459 VOL. II. I. Thomas Bilney Fox. 1 II. Sir Thomas More ; now first published, from a Manuscript in the Lambeth Library, the Author unknown 43 III. William Tindall Fox. 187 IV. Cromwell, Earl of Essex Fox. 219 V. John Rogers Fox. 303 VI. Bishof Hooper Fox. 355 VII. Doctor Rowland Taylor Fox. 405 VIII. Bishop Latimer Fox. 445 xxvm CONTENTS. VOL. III. PAGE I. Bishop Ridley Fox. 1 II. Archbishop Cranmer Fox. 129 III. Thomas Mountain Strype. 283 IV. Bishop Jewel Anonymous. 315 V. Bernard Gilpin Bishop Carleton. 375 VI. Richard Hooker Isaac Walton. 441 VII. Archbishop Whitgift Sir George Paul. 555 VIII. Doctor John Donne Isaac Walton. 631' VOL. IV. I. George Herbert Isaac Walton. 1 II. Sir Henry Wotton Isaac Walton. 65 III. Nicholas Ferrar Dr. Peckard. 117 IV. Bishop Hall Himself. 265 V. Dr. Henry Hammond Bishop Fell. 327 VI. Bishop Sanderson Isaac Walton. 409 VII. Richard Baxter Himself. 489 VIII. Sir Matthew Hale Bishop Burnet. 521 IX. Earl of Rochester Bishop Burnet. 599 X. Archbishop Tillotson Anonymous. 677 Index 727 LIST OF PLATES. Vol. I. — Wiclif Frontispiece. Vol. II. — Cardinal Wolsey Frontispiece. Vol. III. — Bishop Ridley Frontispiece. Archbishop Cranmer To face page 129. Vol. IV. — Bishop Jewel Frontispiece. INTRODUCTION DR. JOHN INETT AND DR. RICHARD BENTLEY. VOL. !. " Equidem fontes unde hauriretis, atque etiam itinera ipsa putavi esse demonstranda." Cicero. INTRODUCTION. THE BRITISH CHURCH; AND THE ANGLICAN1. Though truth is a blessing which God has laid open and in common to mankind, and they who consider the nature of man, and the great purposes for which he is sent into the world cannot but own, that every one has the same right, and is under the same obligation, to embrace truth and reject error, as to make a right use of his natural faculties, or to believe and obey God, and to take care of his own salvation ; and though this is so evident that if they who plead for an implicit faith, did not at the same time offer us marks of the true church and the infallible guide, and in so doing make every private Christian a judge in the greatest and most perplexed controversy in religion, and appeal to the reason which they call us to resign, and by contradicting themselves become the jest, they would fall under a different cha racter, and be treated as the common enemies of mankind ; — yet it must be owned, that it is a strange deference and veneration which some men pay to the understanding and usages of their ancestors. They will not see, if their fathers happened to live in the dark ; refuse truth, if it had not been offered to them ; and venture their salvation upori the credit of their wisdom, who wanted opportunities to be sufficiently informed ; and even they choose error if it has but the colour of antiquity to recommend it. And which is stranger still, as if there was some particular charm 1 The Anglican.] From " Origines Anglicans, or, a History of the English Church, by John Inett, D.D. Chanter and Canon Residentiary of the Cathedral Church of Lincoln. Foi. 2 vols. 1710. Oxford." Being the Preface to Vol. ii. b 2 4 THE BRITISH CHURCH; in proximity of blood, error in the possession of their immediate ancestors has the advantages of truth at a distance ; and the dark, illiterate, and corrupted, are by some Christians preferred to the more knowing and purer ages of the Church. And it is so difficult to set men right who go wrong out of choice, that he who attempts to undeceive them is more likely to fall under their dis pleasure, and be thought their enemy for telling them the truth, than to convince and bring them to retract their errors. But if some men add obstinacy to their mistakes nothing can be more reasonable than that they who never received, or, upon better information, have forsaken the mistakes, should be just to truth, and guard the honour of their religion from the censures and reproaches of those who unhappily mistake and pervert it. Our enemies know too much to trust their cause to the decision of that rule which ought to determine all the controversies of the Christian Church ; take refuge in antiquity, and hope for the pro tection amongst men, which God and his word have denied them ; and when we plead Scriptures, boldly reply, that the doctrines which they now maintain are the same that our ancestors received with their Christianity ; and the authority which they challenge, no other than what these submitted to. Although there is no weight in arguments of this kind, but such as may with equal force serve the interest of Judaism against our common Christianity, and of paganism against them both ; yet the better to undeceive men in their own way, by removing the popular objections from antiquity which commonly mislead them, I have ever thought that a fair and impartial history of the corrupt doctrines of the church of Rome would be the best answer to the antiquity pretended for them, and just views of the time when, and the unworthy arts by which, they gained a power over the Western churches, would be the best, and all the apology that was necessary to justify their rejecting of it. This consideration seems to have directed the labours of that great prelate1 who wrote the history of the British church, and the same views have been the guide to the continuator thereof. The case of the British church is so fully accounted for by the aforesaid prelate, that I shall say nothing of it ; and what has 1 That great prelate.] Bishop Stillingneet ; in his " Origines Britannicee; or, the Antiquities of the British Churches. 1685. Foi." By " the Conti nuator thereof," the author refers to himself, and to the work of which the extract before us is the Preface to the second volume. AND THE ANGLICAN. 5 already been observed * in the history of the first ages of the English church, will render it needless to say more to justify the doctrine of our Holy Mother ; except only to remind the reader, that the missionaries from Rome, who bore a part in the con versions of our ancestors, suffered them to bring some of their pagan corruptions and superstitious practices along with them into the church. Yet they maintained the doctrine of Gregory the Great who forbade the worship of images ; and God was the only object of their worship. They followed the ancients in their prayers to him to consummate the happiness of departed souls, but knew nothing of praying them out of purgatory. Their Homilies2 are full and express against the doctrine of transubstan- tiation. They translated the Holy Scriptures into the vulgar tongue, and by their canons required the reading of them. They forbade private masses, and required and practised the adminis tration of the sacrament in both kinds. And if Lanfrank and the Norman clergy made any change in the doctrine of the blessed sacrament, it went no further than private opinion, till the council of Lateran, in the beginning of the thirteenth century. That of Constance in the fifteenth shows us when, and by what authority the practice of administering the sacrament in one kind was first established. The original of chantries in England in the thirteenth century shows when the doctrine of purgatory was received. That of infallibility arose out of the claims of an universal pastorship, first broached by Gregory the Seventh in the latter end of the eleventh century, but sped in England as it did in France, and was never received. In short, if the world had a just history of 1 Already been observed.] That is, in the author's preceding volume. 2 Their Homilies.] So Archbishop Parker, in his portion of " The Defence of Priests' Marriages." "But, in God's name, why should they make this their doctrine of transubstantiation, and the gross presence to be so new, that Berengarius must be the first author declaring against it ? Whereas ancient records prove the true doctrine was urged and appointed both for priests in their synods, for the religious in their collations, for the common people in their ordinary exhortations, and expressed in Homilies of a great number, extant in Saxon speech for all the festival days in the year, which written were so used many a year before Berengarius was born or heard of. So that the bishops of old may as well be charged to be Calvinists, if the assertion be so considered, as the bishop of Sarum" (Jewell), " or any bishops at these days." p. 336. 4to. black letter. Some of these Homilies were published under the encouragement of the archbishop, by Fox the martyrologist, a.d. 1571. 4to. See also 1 Inett, p. 348— 55, and 366, 7. 6 THE BRITISH CHURCH ; popery, they would have great reason to repent their rashness, who plead antiquity for it, and put their cause upon that issue. And the many new doctrines first established by the council of Trent so fully confirm the truth of this assertion, that I shall think it needless to say more upon this head ; nor had I said this but by showing the reader that these doctrines fall not in the compass of my present design, to account for the reason of my silence respecting them in the following history. In this volume I have endeavoured to perform what I promised to the public in my last ; that is, to give a just view of the English church for some time after the Norman revolution ; and, in par ticular, of the rise and steps of the papal power, and the changes, as well in the government of the state as the church, which attended it. And because the controversies about investitures, the legantine power, the right of appeals, the exemption of the religious from the authority of their bishops, and both of them and the clergy from the civil power, and about the patronage of the crown, give the best light to the government and discipline of the ancient English church, and show us when and how a change was gradually introduced ; and show that this of England was much the same case as that of other churches abroad, which, by the same men, and by the same arts, and about the same time, were broken and subdued to that of Rome ; I have therefore thought myself obliged to be more full and particular in observing the steps and conduct of those long disputes. And indeed, how ever these controversies pass under other titles, the subject of them was neither more nor less than whether the kings of England should continue, or the bishops of Rome should be raised to the head of the national church? whether the bishops of England might act up to their character and the canons of the universal church ; or whether the bishops of Rome might supersede the commission of Christ, and at pleasure control the authority of His church ? whether they should govern the church of Rome as bishops ; or, as monarchs and sovereign princes, should preside over the universal church ? Nor was England the only scene of controversy ; but from the pontificate of Gregory the Seventh, in the latter end of the eleventh century, when the pretence to an universal pastorship was first broached, till the time of pope Innocent the Third in the beginning of the thirteenth, when the authority of the bishops of Rome arrived at its utmost height of grandeur and elevation, the AND THE ANGLICAN. 7 history of the Western churches is little else but one continued scene of strife and contention : one long struggle betwixt the bishops of Rome endeavouring to raise themselves, and the princes and bishops of the West to guard their kingdoms and churches from their usurpation and encroachments. This was so much the case of England, and the artifices and attempts of the bishops of Rome, in pursuance of the aforesaid design, make so great a part in our history, that it is impossible to give a just view of the English church, without observing the measures and conduct of those prelates, whose ambition and designs did about this time occasion so much trouble, and in the event drew so many mischiefs on the church and nation. It is but too evident, that the bishops of Rome did in time gain a jurisdiction over the English church ; and this has been industriously misrepresented, and so artfully covered with the pretence of antiquity, as to deceive some, and raise doubts and scruples in the minds of others : and this pretence was first made use of, to prevent and embarrass all the steps to the Reformation, and ever since to reproach us with a charge of schism '. Besides, not only the doctrines of infallibility and necessity of communion with the church of Rome, but all those doctrines which properly fall under the head of popery, arise out of the claims or depend upon the authority of the see of Rome, and stand and fall with them; and the honour and justice of the Reformation do in some measure turn upon the same foot. I shall therefore, the better to set these matters in a true light, ask the reader's leave to make some historical remarks on the ground and progress of the claims of the court of Rome, which for the reasons above, do necessarily take up so much room in the following history. The unparalleled assurance with which some men challenge a power, which, like the rivers of paradise, encompasses the whole earth, extends to the other world, and determines the future state of mankind ; which in many instances pretends to control the authority of God, to allow what He forbids, and forbid what He allows ; to set up itself as a standard of truth and error, and the last resort of justice ; — would tempt one to think, that a claim which at once shocks the natural notions of God and religion, and 1 Charge of Schism.] /That the church of England was not guilty of schism in her Reformation, see 4 Christian Institutes, p. 312—24. 334—9. 358, 9- Jewell and n. 8 THE BRITISH CHURCH; the common sense of mankind, should have the most express authority of God, or at least something to colour so extraordinary a pretence. But how wretchedly is one disappointed, who finds all this founded on nothing but upon some occasional discourses of our Saviour with St. Peter, or some particular advices and reproofs addressed to that apostle, but so far from giving the least colour to the claims built upon them, that it is hard to say whether they who found them here, or they who carry us to the history of the creation, and undertake the proof from God's making two great lights1, have the greater advantage in the argument. If one looks to the commission which our Saviour gave to His apostles in His lifetime, to preach to the Jewish nation, exclusive both of the Gentiles and Samaritans ; or to that after His resur rection when all power both in heaven and earth was given to Him, to go out into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature, and finds not the least mark of any particular power given to St. Peter; if one considers, that although Christ as God-man was the great lawgiver to His church, yet this power was founded in His divine nature, and was essential to and inseparable from the person of the Mediator ; that as a prophet He came not to be ministered unto, but to minister ; that it was this ministerial and prophetic power 2 which He committed to His church ; we are so much to seek for the regalia of St. Peter, that if history did not explain the secret, the Christian church had in probability been as little acquainted with the pretended powers of the bishops of Rome, as the patriarchs were who lived before the flood. But it is so natural to men who make their fortunes in the world, to indulge a vanity, and the better to cover the meanness of their original, to look backward to find or make a pedigree, to add a lustre to the family which themselves first raised, that we are not to wonder if the bishops of Rome took the same measures, and endeavoured to persuade the world, that the authority which 1 Two great lights.] " They have indeed found the Pope" (says Barrow) " in the first chapter of Genesis, ver. 1 6 ; for, if we believe P. Innocent IIL, he is one of the two great luminaries there ; and he is as plainly there, as any where else in the Bible." Barrow on the Pope's Supremacy ; or Christian Institutes, vol. iv. p. 151. 8vo. 1837. 2 This prophetic power.] See Baxter in Christian Institutes, vol. i. p. 475 ; and Barrow, in the same collection, vol. ii. p. 398. AND THE ANGLICAN. 9 was first gained by their own conduct, was founded in the com mission of Christ. And the sense and practice of the whole Christian church, for a thousand years after Christ, do so fully confirm this conjecture, that there is no one thing more evident, than that the aforesaid claims, and the wrested interpretation of Scriptures on which they are built, had the same beginning, and were ushered into the world by that ambition which first broached the pretence to an universal pastorship. And the success and credit thereof has been answerable to the weakness of the pretence ; for at least two-thirds of the Christian world rejected as well the aforesaid interpretations, as the doc trines which were built upon them : and those Christians who have been unhappily deceived by the assurance with which the court of Rome has endeavoured to impose their pretensions, do still differ so much about them, that if a visible interest did not enable us to account for it, one would wonder how such great bodies of Christians should centre in the communion of a church, when the principles on which that unity is founded, so vastly differ, or rather so directly destroy one another, that it may be truly said of the claims of the court of Rome, that they have had the fate which commonly attends impostures, which seldom need any thing else to detect and expose them, but the inconsistent tales which are usually made for their colour and support. For a primacy of order, an universal pastorship by divine right, and an authority over the Western church in right of the patriarchate of Rome, are so many several things so widely distant in their own original, their nature and extent, that if they do not flatter themselves, who tell us that the Spanish and Italian churches maintain the supremacy, and in consequence thereof the infallibility of the bishops of Rome by divine right, the Gallican church is certainly in the wrong, and guilty of heresy in denying both ; but if the French are in the right, the charge" of heresy will with equal force turn back on the Spanish and Italian churches. If a more favourable construction be put upon this controversy betwixt those churches, it may be, it will appear much more to the disadvantage of those claims which occasion it ; for if they who boast so much of the zeal of the Spaniards for the grandeur of the papacy, would follow them to their dominions in Italy, and observe the jurisdiction which they challenge and exercise in the right of the crown of Naples, and call to mind the vigorous efforts of their bishops, as well as of the French and Germans, in the 10 THE BRITISH CHURCH; council of Trent, for the divine right of episcopal residence and the consequences of that doctrine ; or consider their friendship and communion with the Gallican church, which so openly denies and confutes the supremacy ofthe bishops of Rome,— they can not easily be persuaded that the Spaniards are such friends to those claims as some men seem to believe. And one who reflects on the conduct of the Portuguese, upon that revolution which brought the present royal family to the crown of Portugal, with what steadiness and resolution they opposed the attempts of the court of Rome, to gain a part in the nomination of their bishops ; that notwithstanding the unsettled state of the new government, the vigorous attempts of the Spaniards to reduce that kingdom to their obedience, and the utmost inconveniences which their church suffered by that dispute, — yet for above twenty years they maintained their ground, and at last secured the rights of the crown, — will be apt to think, that the bigotry of that people is not such a blind and governable thing as some men seem to imagine. And indeed the conduct of all the Western princes in communion with the church of Rome is so much alike, whenever their interests call them to dispute the claims of the court of Rome, as might convince the world that they mean no more by the pompous titles they bestow upon the bishops of Rome, than what the emperor Phocas intended, when he conferred upon them the title of oecumenical bishops ; or the preceding emperors, when in their edicts and rescripts they gave the same titles to the bishops of the greater sees. And the unsuccessful attempts of those prelates to put an end to the disputes betwixt the Dominicans and Franciscans, the Jansenists and the Jesuits, and even to quiet the trifling squabbles, where the sentiments, the honour, the offices, or the privileges of particular orders are concerned, would incline one to think, that the universal pastor ship has little credit amongst those who are under the obligations of vows and interest to support it. Whatever the present sense of some Western churches may be in this particular, nothing can be more evident, than that all the apostles and all the first Christian bishops consulted and acted in common1, and ever treated one another as colleagues and brethren ; that the government and discipline of the whole 1 In common.] See Barrow on the Pope's Supremacy ; or Christian Insti. tutes, vol. iii. p. 267 — 70. AND THE ANGLICAN. 11 Christian church was founded on a belief of an equality of cha racter and power, common to the whole order of bishops ; that several popes in their disputes with the African bishops founded their claim on a pretended canon of the council of Nice ; that when the title of universal bishop was first given to the patriarch of Constantinople, Gregory the Great founded his arguments against that title, not on any particular right of his own see, but on the indignity thereby offered to the whole order of bishops : to say no more, — the grounds upon which the councils of Nice, Chalcedon and Constantinople, settle the patriarchal dignities are so certain, so full and uncontrollable an evidence of the sense of the whole Christian church, against the universal pastorship of the bishops of Rome by divine right, that if some men's ambition had not extinguished all sense of truth and modesty, and some corruptions in doctrine and worship, which depend chiefly on the authority of the see of Rome, had not disposed others to favour the pretensions which at once shelter their errors and serve some unworthy ends, I make no doubt but the claims of that court had long since been exploded, as the worst grounded and the most dangerous imposture that was ever offered to the Christian world. The Gallican church pretends to steer a middle course, be twixt a bare primacy of order by canon, and the supreme authority over the church, or the universal pastorship by divine right ; and yet in the decrees of their general assembly in the year 1682, wherein that church has published her sentiments on that sub ject, they treat of it in such a manner, as if they designed to mortify the power which they pretend to advance ; to justify the churches which are already reformed ; and open the way to the reformation of that of France. For whilst they assert the pri macy of St. Peter and his successors by the institution of Christ, speak of the majesty of the apostolic see and the obedience due to the bishops of Rome from all Christians, they renounce the authority of the Church in temporal matters ; they confirm the council of Constance, the 4th and 5th sessions especially, which subject the bishops of Rome even to be deposed by a general council ; deny their infallibility in matters of faith ; and bound their authority in matters of discipline, not only by the canons of the Christian church, but by the rules, customs, and institutions of states and national churches ; and found these decrees on the 12 THE BRITISH CHURCH; authority derived to them from the Holy Ghost. How consistent these decrees are with themselves or with the usages of the Gal- lican church, I shall leave others to determine ; but if there can be such a visionary primacy as is consistent with the natural rights of princes, the canons of the universal church, the just liberties of national churches, and the authority of Christian bishops, there seems no more reason to quarrel about it, than to make war upon the king of Spain for his title of king of Jerusa lem ; or undertake to confute the claims of a certain prince who calls himself the emperor of the Sun : in short, whatever occa sioned or whatever be the issue of these decrees, I cannot but say of them as St. Paul does on a like occasion, whether of truth and good-will, or out of contention, yet Christ is preached, and I glory in it. For the sense of this council is so agreeable to the sentiments of the greatest writers of that nation, who with in comparable learning and judgment have confuted the supremacy of the bishops of Rome, and does so much overbalance whatever can be pretended from the contrary sense of the Spanish and Italian churches, and at the same time does so fully assert the independence of the Gallican church, and thereby justify the con duct of the reformed churches, and open a way to the reforma tion of a church which has made so open and so vigorous a step toward it, — that one cannot but hope that it may in time pro duce great effects for the good of Christendom. They who give up the aforesaid claims as indefensible by scripture and the best antiquity, and found their hopes in the patriarchal institution ', and upon this foot challenge the obe dience of the Western churches, have some colour for their pre tensions. But unless this argument be carried beyond its due length, the controversy on this head would be confined to the bounds of Italy, and no way deserve the reflections of an English historian. Yet because this institution leads to the true original of the authority of those prelates, who suffered their ingratitude to keep equal paces with their ambition, and in time disowned the trust which was the first step to their succeeding greatness, and to this day continues to be the most colourable pretence for it ; to set this matter in a just light, it may be fit to observe the 1 The patriarchal institution.] See Barrow on the Pope's Supremacy ; or Christian Institutes, vol. iii. p. 370 — 3. AND THE ANGLICAN. 13 original, the nature, the extent and consequences of this institu tion, before I come to consider the sense of the English church and nation in the matter under question. The gospel having made a great progress in the empire, the fathers of the church began very early to suit the policy and dis cipline thereof to the form of the civil government \ and by silent consent yielded a superiority to the bishops of the greater sees ; and the success of this change answering the expected ends, the first council of Nice settled it by canon, and leaving the metro politans, or the bishops of the metropolis, in possession of the power which had before been allowed by silent consent and con firmed by usage, they made a farther step, still acting upon the same view, the plan of the civil government. During the in fancy of the Roman empire, the court of the prefect of Rome was the last resort of justice, and appeals were brought thither from the utmost parts of the empire ; but to render the methods of justice more easy, the succeeding emperors changed this course and divided their dominions into districts, which, from the title of prefects given to the persons who presided in them, came in time to be termed prefectures. And after several changes, about the reign of Constantine the Great, Rome, Antioch, Alex andria, and Treves, were set out for the residence of their pre fects, and for the supreme courts of justice to all the adjacent provinces. Rome to some parts of Italy and Africa ; Antioch to the eastern provinces ; Alexandria to Egypt, Libya, and the neighbouring provinces of the empire ; Treves to Britain, Spain, and Gaul. From this platform the bounds of the church and the empire being much the same, the bishops of Rome, Antioch, and Alexandria, were by the consent of the church raised above the rest by the council of Nice ; and upon the same grounds, after the building of Constantinople and settling it as a new seat of the empire, next in honour and precedence to Rome, and styled New Rome, the bishops thereof were by the council of Constantinople raised to the second place in the church. Jeru salem, before subject to Antioch, as the mother church of Chris tendom was upon that ground considered by the same council ; and as the bishops thereof were the only prelates advanced above 1 The civil government^] See Hooker, b. vii. c. viii. § 7. Keble's edition ; and Barrow on the Pope's Supremacy; or Christian Institutes, vol. iii. p. 269—73. , 14 THE BRITISH CHURCH; their brethren on the foot of our common Christianity, they seem to have much the fairest claim to the eminence of authority, which they of Rome only pretend to. Things being thus settled by the councils of Nice and Con stantinople, about the time of the council of Chalcedon in the following century, the bishops of those churches acquired the title of patriarchs, and their districts of patriarchates ; their sees were styled apostolical, and so great a deference was paid to their persons, that the emperors in their rescripts address to them under the title of holiness, and style them oecumenical pa triarchs ; and in the seventh Novel of Justinian, tit. i. that prince addresses Epiphanius, then bishop of Constantinople, not only under the title of most holy and blessed archbishop and patriarch of that city, (as the bishops of Rome were usually called patriarchs of the city of Rome,) but adds as a distinct title, that of oecumenical patriarch. Treves, the chief seat of the Gallic prefecture, though equally within the reason and grounds of this establishment when it was first projected, had yet no part therein. But this seems owing not to any oversight or omission, much less to any design to open a way to the pretensions of the bishops of Rome, (for the whole course of this affair, and the part which those prelates acted therein, oblige one to believe those pretences were not at this time so much as thought of by any side,) but was occasioned by the circumstances of that part of the Roman empire. For Gaul, which was the name the Romans gave to that vast tract of land lying betwixt the Alps ahd the Pyreneans, the Mediterranean, the Ocean, and the Rhine, was exceedingly infested by the irruptions of the French and Almans, the Vandals, Alans, Burgundians, the Sueves, and Visigoths ; and the French gained such footing therein, that after a succession of some lesser princes, the French monarchy was settled by Pharamond about the year 420. Pretty near the same time the Vandals seated themselves in Spain, as the Saxons did in Britain about the middle of that century, and the whole empire received such a shock in the taking of Rome by the Goths in the beginning of the same age, that although the emperors continued their titles to these king doms, yet they were never recovered to the empire, and were torn off from it before the final settlement of the patriarchal power in the council of Chalcedon. The kingdoms about the Baltic were never subdued by the Romans ; and the impressions AND THE ANGLICAN. 15 which they made upon Germany were so far short of a perfect conquest, that it may more properly be said, that that country added a bare title to the emperors, rather than enlarged the bounds of their dominions. — These few reflections make it easy to conceive how it came to pass, that the western and northern kingdoms were so little considered, or rather not thought of at all, by those councils which settled the patriarchal institution. But if they had, those nations had certainly fallen within the patriarchate designed to answer the Gallic prefecture ; and Treves, not Rome, had been the seat of it ; and even if Britain, France, and Spain had been laid into the patriarchate of Rome, I make no doubt but the same authority which first settled, would have put an end to this institution, had those who formed it lived to see the empire torn to pieces, and in that change the reason entirely extinguished upon which it was founded. And since God only, who sees things that are not as if they were, can give such laws as shall be for ever binding ; since there is not a nation or a church in the world, which has not great numbers of laws and canons grown obsolete by change of circumstances ; and this is the case of many canons of general councils, and of that of the apostles " to abstain from blood," and even of the whole ritual law, and must of necessity be the case of all human constitutions, the obligation ever ceasing with the reason on which they are grounded ; nothing can be more evident than this propo sition, that it is the interest of a party, not the weight of argu ment, which supports the pretended patriarchal power of the bishops of Rome. In short, they have as good a title to be kings as patriarchs of Great Britain, and might with a better colour challenge the crown from the void resignation of King John, than pretend to an authority over the English church, by virtue of those canons which settled the patriarchal power. But though the authority of that institution is long since de termined .with the reason of it, yet it had such good effect in the East, that if it had been carried to the intended lengths in the West, and a patriarchate settled there to answer the Gallic pre fecture, in all probability it would have prevented the mischiefs the Western churches have suffered by the claims of the bishops of Rome. But so it was, that whilst the Eastern churches were so well guarded thereby, that notwithstanding the shock they received by the conquest of the Latins in the beginning of the thirteenth century, and the pretended submission of the Greek to 16 THE BRITISH CHURCH; the Latin church in the council of Florence, the Greek churches preserve their rights and liberties to this day : — God, for reasons best known to himself, left the Western churches open and un guarded, and in time suffered them to become a prey to the am bition of the bishops of Rome. For these prelates, being thus raised in that capacity to the first place in the Christian church, were exceedingly elated by their new character ; and the way being thus prepared, a great many things fell to favour their ambition. The zeal and resolution of those prelates in opposing the Arian heresy brightened their character. The countenance which pope Zachary and Stephen gave to the deposition of Childeric king of the Franks, and setting up the Carlovingian line, so engaged the princes of that house, that by their interest the Gallican church was united to that of Rome the latter end of the eighth century. The transla tion of the empire to the Franks, wherein pope Stephen and Leo acted a part, was returned by Charlemagne in conferring great wealth, and power, and privileges on the see of Rome ; and the bishops thereof were thereby raised to the state of temporal princes about the year 800. The afflictions which fell upon Christendom by those inundations which tore the empire in pieces, did indeed lessen their merit, but raised their power and interest. For those invasions in a great measure bore down the religion, and extinguished the learning, and for some time spread paganism through all the Western nations ; and the bishops of Rome having a hand in the conversion of these invaders, suffered them to bring a great deal of their pagan doctrine and superstitious worship along with them into the church ; treated them as the Jesuits have lately done their converts in China ; and became popular by indulging and defending their errors. The purity of the gospel being thus corrupted, and the discipline and ancient government of the church in great measure forgotten, great numbers of forged epistles were published to raise a belief of the ancient power and privileges of those pre lates ; and though now rejected by the most learned men1 of that communion, yet they passed for true history in the ages wherein they were published, and in great measure answered the purposes for which they were designed. 1 The most learned men.] See Joannis Morini Vita, in his Antiquitates Ecclesiee Orientalis, p. v. vi. 1703. AND THE ANGLICAN. 17 But still, though they made a great figure in the West, it yet went little farther than parade and show. Their power was pre carious and uncertain, ruffled and checked at pleasure ; and the canons ofthe church turned against them by every private bishop. In short, their authority was controlled and denied, and even insulted, whenever it bore too hard on the rights of princes, synods, and national churches. And thus things continued till Gregory the Seventh, in the latter end of the eleventh century, published his design to erect the ecclesiastical monarchy. And indeed, whilst the church of Rome continued in a state of dependence on the empire, and the bishops thereof were nominated, or at least their elections confirmed by the emperors, and did not enter upon the pontifical authority till they were qualified for it by an oath of allegiance to them;— it was impossible they should ever raise themselves to a sovereign power over other national churches ; for nothing could be so wild and ridiculous as to challenge the title of mistress and mother of other churches, when she was not mistress of herself; or to pretend to separate other churches from a dependence on the supreme authority of states and kingdoms, whilst that of Rome itself remained in a state of dependence on the empire. And the long disputes betwixt the emperors and the bishops of Rome on that subject, begun by Gregory the Seventh, put it beyond all doubt, that this was the case of that church when that prelate 1 was raised to the papal chair. Having said thus much, to give a short view of the claims and pretensions of the bishops of Rome, and the first steps they made towards the supreme jurisdiction and sovereign power which they gained in time over the Western churches ; I come now to con sider the state and sense of the English church in particular. And here it will be requisite to observe, I. The nature and extent of the supremacy or sovereign juris diction those prelates pretend to. I shall not lead the reader to the dictates or maxims of Pope Gregory the Seventh, or to the boundary set out by the canon law, or by the council of Trent, but observe the nature and extent thereof whilst received in England, or as now exercised in some other churches of the West. And this consisted in confirming the elections of archbishops and bishops; putting them in possession of their respective trusts; and, in return, receiving an oath of canonical obedience from 1 When that prelate.] April 22, 1073. VOL. I. 0 18 THE BRITISH CHURCH; them; calling them to councils abroad, and to national synods at home ; discharging places and persons from their jurisdiction, and receiving appeals from their courts ; exempting the persons of the clergy from the authority, and their revenues from the impo sitions of the state ; and subjecting both these to themselves, exempting the lands of some of the religious from payment of tithes ; and subjecting as well them as the secular clergy to first- fruits, tenths, pensions, and subsidies imposed by themselves. There are some other instances wherein those prelates exercised a sovereign power over the English church, but they are branches from these greater articles, and must stand or fall with them. — This being said of the nature and subjects of the supremacy of the bishops of Rome, it will be fit to proceed and enquire, II. How far the ancient English church was affected by it. And here we are to observe, that although one part of the English nation owed its conversion to the see of Rome, and all the rest complied in some ofthe rites and usages thereof; and the archbishops did sometimes receive their palls from thence ; and the whole English church paid a great deal of deference to the bishops of that see ; — yet in all our histories and records, from the first planting of the Gospel amongst the Britons1 to the 1 Amongst the Britons.] See Bishop Stillingfleet's Origines Britannica, chap. iii. p. 99—144. (The Just Rights ofthe British Churches cleared.)— No evidence that they were under the Roman patriarchate; and chap. v. p. 356—64. (Independence of the British Churches, evinced by their conduct towards Augustine the Monk.) So the learned Sir Roger Twisden, in his excellent work, An Historical Vindication of the Church of England, in point of Schism. 1675, 4to, p. 7, says, "As the Britons are not read to have yielded any sub jection to the Papacy, so neither is Rome noted to have taken any notice of them. For Gregory the Great, about 590, being told certain children were de Britannia insula, did not know whether the country were Christian or Pagan. And when Augustine came hither (598), and demanded their obe dience to the Church of Rome, the abbot of Bangor returned him answer, ' that they were obedient to the church of God, to the pope of Rome, and to every godly Christian to love every one in his degree in charity, to help them in word and deed to be the children of God ; and other obedience than this they did not know to be due to him, whom he named to be pope, and to be father of fathers.' . . . And it appears by Giraldus Cambrensis, this distance between the two churches continued long, even till Henry II. (1185) induced their submission by force; before which ' episcopi Wallise a Menevensi antistite sunt consecrati, et ipse similiter ab aliis tanquam suffra- ganeis est consecratus, nulla penitus alii ecclesiae facta professione vel subjec- tione;' the generality of which words must be construed to have reference AND THE ANGLICAN. 19 Norman revolution, there is not so much as a single instance of any one bishop whose election was confirmed by those of Rome, or put in possession of his trust, or tied to them by an oath of canonical obedience ; of any council called in England by their authority ; or bishop called to their councils abroad ; of any per son or society exempted from the authority of their proper bishops; or of any appeal made from their courts to that of Rome ; of any tenth, first-fruits, or subsidies paid to or imposed by them : in short, there is not any law of the state, nor any canon of the church, that gives the least countenance to the pre tended authority of the bishops of Rome ; there is not the least mark of any jurisdiction or authority exercised by them over the ancient English church. And one who considers, that jurisdiction is a plain and a sensible thing, and appears so evidently in canons and matters of fact ; that church discipline and forms of eccle siastical business do as certainly discover the seat and boundaries of ecclesiastical power, as the style of laws and forms of justice set out the nature of civil government, and enable us to distinguish a monarchy from a commonwealth ; — should, one would think, need nothing more than the entire silence of our history to clear the matter under question. If this be not enough to give us a just view of the sense and practice of the English church in this particular, it may be fit to observe, that when the legate of the bishop of Rome, Boniface archbishop of Mentz, by whose address the princes of the Car lovingian line were wrought upon to subject, or at least to unite, the Gallican church to that of Rome, in an epistle to Cuthbert archbishop of Canterbury attempted to bring the English church to the like condition ; the council of Cloveshoe in the year 747 not only rejected the offer with resentment, but by an express canon : asserted the freedom and independency thereof. Besides, as our history does not afford one single instance in favour of the as well to Rome as Canterbury. For, a little after, he shows that though Augustine called them to council as a legate of the apostolic see, yet returned they did proclaim they would 'not acknowledge him an archbishop, but did contemn both himself and what he had established.' ' I confess,' says he again, ' that it has ever seemed to me (and he alleges his reasons) that they received the first principles of their Christianity from Asia.' "—Ibid. p. 7. 1 An express canon.] The Acts of the council (see 1 Wilkins's Concilia, p. 90—100) do not seem to warrant this strong expression. I do not see that much can be concluded from them either way. c 2 20 THE BRITISH CHURCH ; papal claims, so, on the contrary, they are full and express on the side of the royal supremacy. The kings of England acted as the supreme ordinaries and heads of the national church; and, as such, set out and divided dioceses ; named their bishops and received appeals from their courts ; convened national councils ; and by their laws settled the revenues of the church ; directed the con duct, and punished all offences of the clergy against the state ; and, as occasion required, subjected their revenues to the support of the government. And the long struggle and opposition which they made to guard their rights from the usurpations of the court of Rome, and the subsequent changes in the polity and order of this church occasioned thereby, so fully confirm what has been already suggested on tins head, that if some men had not lost all sense of shame and regard of truth, the supremacy of the bishops of Rome over the ancient English church had never been the subject of dispute. But, III. It must be owned, that during the reign of William the First, pope Gregory * published the claims of the bishops of Rome to a supreme authority over the whole Christian church ; and what our Saviour said to St. Peter of the rock on which he would build his church, the charge he gave him to feed his sheep, and what he said of himself of his being the way and the door ; and, in short, all the fine things that could be thought on, were laid together to give weight to, or at least to colour that pretence. — But after all, if arguments of a very different nature from those of the Gospel had not come in to their aid, the English church after the Conquest had doubtless paid as little regard to this pretence, as it had done before; and this sort of reasoning had sig nified as much in the Western, as it did in the Eastern churches, which paid no more regard to it than to the claims ofthe Turks in favour of Mahomet. How it came to pass wiE be fully accounted for in the following history ; but it may be fit shortly to observe here on this head, that king Henry the First, by yielding up his right of investiture and giving way to the legantine power, advanced the bishops of Rome to the head of the English clergy. In consequence of those concessions they became judges of the elections of bishops ; put them in possession of their trusts ; 1 Pope Gregory.] Of the general history of Hildebrand, or Pope Gregory VII., as connected with his vast ambitious designs on England, See., see Inett, vol. ii. p. 32 — 69 ; Christian Institutes, vol. iv. p. 104 — 7. 120 — 2. and Index, under Gregory VII. AND THE ANGLICAN. 21 required an oath of obedience from them ; called national councils at home ; obliged them to attend their councils abroad ; and in time came to lay impositions on the revenues, and to dispose of the preferments of the church. The right of appeals, and the exemptions of the clergy from the authority of the state, con tended for and begun in king Stephen's, were yielded up in the following reign of Henry the Second ; and the designs of that court were consummated, and the civil as well as the ecclesiastical supremacy, so far as was in the power of that prince, was put into their hands by king John. It is here we have the beginning, the steps, and the foundation of the papal supremacy over the English Church, which the flat terers of that pretence look for in vain in the preceding ages. And the whole course of our history so fully justifies this account, that whereas before the Conquest we have neither marks nor footsteps of the papal jurisdiction, — from the time of the aforesaid agree ments to the Reformation, our ecclesiastic history is little else but different scenes of oppression, and of remonstrances against the abuses it occasioned. — Whether this change in fact and practice altered the sentiments, and changed the faith and sense of the church and nation in this particular, is the next thing to be enquired into. IV. One would have expected, that men who are so very for ward to reproach us with a parliamentary church and a state religion, would have produced some canon of an English national council, grounded on the authority of Christ or the consent of the universal church, to justify this change in the government thereof; at least some public act of the state. But after all it is very evident, that all through the long controversies which their claims occasioned, the nobility, bishops, and clergy, some few excepted, adhered steadily to the rights of the crown and the church ; and that when king Henry did what in him lay to give them away in the great council held in London in the year 1107, he acted wholly upon political reasons ; and was over-influenced by his great minister and favourite the Earl of Mellent, against the sense ofthe wiser and greater part of that assembly. And this was so much the case in all the other disputes on this subject, that if any credit can be given to history, the supreme authority of the bishops of Rome over the English church had no other foundation, but some unhappy concessions or leagues betwixt the kings of England and those prelates, occasioned by the bad titles, 22 THE BRITISH CHURCH ; the weakness, the ill circumstances, or the difficulties which the arts of that court had drawn upon them. If the same reasons, upon which our princes acted in the afore said changes, did not oblige the church and nation to submit to them, then, since (unless the restoration of the papal power in the reign of queen Mary may be so called) it does not appear that a submission was ever settled by any law of the state, or any canon of the English church. On the contrary, the entire and full sovereignty of the imperial crown of England was so con stantly asserted by our several succeeding kings and their great councils ; and the pretended supremacy of those prelates was so frequently denied and controlled, and even insulted by the statutes of mortmain, prsBmunire, and provisors, annates or first-fruits, and that of Henry the Seventh rescinding the papal exemptions of the religious from the payment of tithes ; and was so restrained in all the parts and branches thereof, whenever it interfered with the rights of the crown or the good of the nation ; and was at last so generally renounced and abjured \ as well by the whole clergy in convocation, as by the people in parliament ; and all this brought about in fewer weeks than it had cost years to obtain ; and whilst popery, in other respects, continued the established religion, and did depend so far on the authority of the bishops of Rome, that it was easy to foresee that this change would open the way to the Reformation which the body of his clergy so much dreaded. Hence if any judgment can be made of the faith of a Christian church and nation by the canons, the laws and practices thereof, the supremacy of the bishops of Rome was never received as a part of the religion of England, any more than it is at this time in France ; but, on the contrary, was ever esteemed an usurpation on the rights of the monarchy and the church. Besides it is very evident, that the attempt of king John to render the kingdom a fief of the papacy, though attended with the forms and appearances of law, was ever thought a void 2 and illegal act, and 1 Renounced and abjured.] An Act (26 Hen. VIII. c. i. A.D. 1 535-6) concerning the King's Highness to be Supreme Head, &c. and An Act (28 Hen. VIII. c. x. A.D. 1537) extinguishing the authority of the Bishop of Rome. 2 Ever thought a void.] The king (Edward III.) had lately received notice, that the pope, in consideration of the homage which John, king of England, had formerly paid to the see of Rome, and of the tribute by him granted to the said see, intended by process to cite his majesty to appear at AND THE ANGLICAN. 23 served only to reproach the memory of that prince and the wickedness of that court which compelled him to it ; and to let his court at Avignon, to answer for his defaults in not performing what the said king his predecessor had so undertaken for him and his heirs, kings of England. Whereupon the king required the advice of his parliament, what course he had best take, if any such process should come out against him. The bishops, lords and commons desired until the following day to give in their answer; when being again assembled, after full deliberation, they declared as follows : that " neither king John, nor any other king, could bring himself, his realm, and people, under such subjection without their assent; and if it was done, it was done without consent of parliament, and contrary to his coronation oath ; that he was notoriously compelled to it by the necessity of his affairs and the iniquity of the times. Wherefore the said estates enacted, that in case the pope should attempt any thing by process, or any other way, to constrain the king and his subjects to perform what he says he lays claim to in this respect, they would resist and withstand him to the utmost of their power." Parliamentary History of England, vol. i. p. 130. Compare Cotton's Abridgment, p. 102. foi. Of hardly inferior value, is a very explicit testimony even from Sir Thomas More: " Nowe if he saye, as in dede some wryters saye, that king John made England and Ireland tributary to the pope and the see apostolike, by the graunt of a thousand markes ; we dare surely saye agayne that it is untrue ; and that all Rome neither can shewe such a graunt, nor never could : and if they could, it were right nought worth. For never could any kinge of Eng land geve away the realm to the pope, or make the land tributary though he would ; nor no such moneye is there payde, nor never was." The Suppli cation of Souls. Works of Sir Thomas More, p. 296. 1557- foi. The testimony, I say, is valuable, as proceeding from » high constitutional authority. At the same time, you cannot but remark, in reference to a different point, that it is not pleasant to see with what confidence, in a con troversial spirit, and in extenuation of the offences of the see of Rome, such a man should so confidently contradict, as he here does, the unquestionable facts of this tribute having been imposed, and exacted, till it came to be denied in a tone too firm for the pope to overcome. It is true that More might not have so fully all the sources of information which we possess ; but ignorance can hardly be thought a sufficient excuse for assertions so positive and confident. See also Sir Thomas Smith's Commonwealth of England, b. i. c. ix. We may remark yet again, on this important point, that we have the general argument well put and clearly expressed, in a short tract of bishop Hooper, preserved by Strype, in his Ecclesiastical Memorials, (vol. iii. No. xxvi. Records), and entitled De vera ratione invenienda) et fugiendce falsee doctrinal. It was written, as the reader will perceive, in the reign of queen Mary. " Et quod auctoritatem suam papa ratam esse voluerit, quasi a regibus et principibus concessam, certo scimus reges et principes, et si vellent, non posse 24 THE BRITISH CHURCH; posterity see how impossible it is to guard the civil, whenever the ecclesiastical supremacy shall be ravished from the crown : and yet it is certain, the grants of the ecclesiastical supremacy were no less mischievous and no better grounded, than that charter which pretended to give away the crown. — And if this be a true state of our case, the charge of schism against the reformed church of England must of necessity vanish with the imposture which supports it ; and there can be no more ground to question the wisdom and justice of our reformation, than to doubt whether a nation may resume the rights ' which were illegally given away ; or aliquam sua dignitatis partem cuiquam conferre, nee a suo officio et honore deponere. Nam quod Deus necessario alicui statui conjungit, nemo in ahum statum transferre valet. Reges autem sub se ministros, qui ecclesia et reipubKcce munia ministrent, habere possunt, sed pares vel superiores in ecclesise vel reipub. ministerio habere, regibus non licet. Et si forte quispiam, vel regis permissione, vel aliqua temporis pr&scriptione, vel tyrannide, in eccle- siis auctoritatem sibi vindicat; nemo tamen illius auctoritati obtemperare debet, nee episcopo, nee papae, quatenus sunt episcopi; quandoquidem a Deo talem potestatem non habent : nee quia a regibus missi, propterea quod talem potestatem reges episcopo papali facere non possunt. Sed hanc potestatem papae clare vindicat Joannes (Apoc. xvii.) originem suam ha- buisse nee a Deo nee ab homine, sed ex abysso ; et in interitum procul dubio brevi ibit. " Sed hanc violentiam et Satanicam auctoritatem papae, non est prsesentis instituti ulterius prosequi. Tantum admonere volui, quamvis contra omnia jura divina et humana, nunc iterum, propter nostra peccata, inter Anglos caput ecclesia appellari obtinuerit ; non plus hie habere jurisdictionis, quam infimus episcopus Anglim habet Romce. Et tandem denuo Dominus interficiet ilium spiritu oris sui, ut antehac fecit." P. 75, 76. In a later age, the like objection was urged to the royal concessions, to another species of tyranny and usurpation, that of democracy and regicide. " This parliament," says the noble-minded Marquis of Ormond to Lord Inchiquin, (Nov. 17, 1648) "have voted the king's answers unsatisfactory; though they were os large, or larger than he could give : for to my sense he hath parted with more than his own." Carte's Life of Ormond, vol. iii. p. 593. Again in the State Papers of Edward Earl of Clarendon, vol. ii. p. 309. " The king hath not power to release one grain of the allegiance that is due to him." 1 May resume the rights.] All the points connected with these matters were deliberately considered by the Convocation of 1536, and accordingly, on this in particular, in their Institution of a Christian Man, 1537 (the Bishop's Book), they thus express themselves, under the head " The Sacrament of Orders." foi. p. 50, 51. "Whereas the kynges most royall Majestie, consyderynge of his most excellent wysedom, not only the notable decaye of Christe's true and perfytte religion amonges us, but also the intollerable thraldome, captivitie and AND THE ANGLICAN. 25 a Christian church may act up to the commission of Christ, and contend earnestly for the faith which he delivered to the saints. These few reflections on the claims of the bishops of Rome, on their true and pretended antiquity ; on the grounds and the con sequences thereof; and on the sense of the Christian church in general on this subject, and of that of England in particular, will, I hope, give the reader a just view of the nature and importance of those disputes occasioned thereby : and by leaving it out of doubt that it was guarding the supremacy of the crown, and preserving the ancient freedom and independence of the English church on the one side, and on the other usurping on the rights of both, which were the great subject of the aforesaid controversies, will sufficiently answer for the room which has been allowed them in the following history. bondage, with the infinite damages and prejudices, whiche we and other his subjectes continually susteyned, by reason of that longe-usurped and abused power, whiche the bishops of Rome were wonte to exercyse here in this realme, hath nowe of his moste godly disposition, and by consent of his nobles spiritual and temporal, and by the auctoritie of the hole parlyament, determyned no longer to suffer the byshop of Rome to execute any parte of his jurisdiction here within this realme, but clerely to delyver us from the same, and restore us again to our olde lybertie ; surely we have great cause most joyfully and thankefully to embrace and accepte the same, considerynge that therby no prejudice is done to Goddis worde or his ordynances. For, as we have shewed and declared before, it was by princes and men's ordinance and sufferance onely that the byshop of Rome exercysed any such jurisdiction within this realme, and not by any auctoritie gyven unto hym by Christe. And, as for the byshop of Rome, he can not pretende himselfe no more to be greved or injured therewith, than the kynges chancellour, or any other his offycers might worthily thinke, that the kinges highnes shulde do hym wronge, in case he shulde upon good causes remove hym from his sayde roome and offyce, and committe it unto another. And as for us and other the kynges faythfulle subjectes, we shall undoubtedly receyve and have therby syngular welthe and commoditie, as well spiritually to the edi- fienge of our soules, as corporally to the encrease of our substance and ryches." See also a passage to the same purport, under the same head, in the Necessary Doctrine and Erudition for any Christian Man. (The King's Book, 1543. signat. I. 6, 7.) The reader is aware that two years before, viz., in 1534, the bishops, universities, collegiate churches, monasteries, and learned men generally throughout the kingdom, on being formally consulted by the king, had, with very few exceptions, determined : " Romanum episcopum majorem aliquam jurisdictionem non habere sibi a Deo collatam in sacra scriptura, in hoc regno Angliae, quam alium quemvis externum episcopum." Twisden, 72 and 119. 26 THE BRITISH CHURCH; If I have not carried this work so low as might be expected, and this be not sufficiently accounted for by what has been already said on the subject thereof, I hope I may be allowed to say, that I have performed what I promised to the public in my last, and given a just view of the state of the church from the first rise of the papal power, till that usurpation was carried to its utmost height of grandeur and elevation ; and of the changes occasioned thereby both in church and state. — When the hard fate of our Holy Mother, which stands charged by one party with approaching too near to that of Rome, whilst that church, which one would think was the best judge of compliances of this kind, charges us with heresy and schism for standing at too great a distance from her, first obliged me to lay out all the time I was master of, the better to enable me to make a true judgment of the controversies which so unhappily divide the state of Christ endom ; and the bright pattern of that most worthy and learned prelate, who wrote the History of the British Church, had brought me to a resolution to endeavour to do right to our Holy Mother by setting her history in a true light ; I flattered myself with the hopes of continuing our history, from the time where the learned bishop of Worcester concludes his, till the resumption thereof by another very learned and most worthy prelate 1, in his History of the Reformation ; and designed in three short and distinct volumes to set out the three great periods and different states of the English church : the first, that before the Conquest, whilst its primitive freedom and independence on that of Rome were duly preserved ; the second, the state of the church from the Norman revolution, whilst things were in a ferment, and the usurpations of the bishops of Rome still making new steps, till their sovereign power rose to its full growth in the reign of king John ; the third, to give a just view of our affairs during the vassalage and subjection of the English church to that of Rome, till the Reformation so happily rescued the church and kingdom from the mischiefs of that usurpation. The first part of this design has been published some years since ; the second is what now I offer to the public : but the time and my age have in some measure cooled the sanguine thoughts I once had of the third ; and the views I have taken, and the steps I have made towards it, drive one backward, and rather 1 Another most worthy prelate.] Bishop Burnet. AND THE ANGLICAN. 27 throw one into despair, than bring me to any resolution to pro ceed. For to say nothing of the expense of time, the charge and difficulties which attend the ver}- access to records and manu scripts, from whence the most considerable notices are to be expected ; it is no little mortification to hunt from one record to another, to find little else but new scenes of tyranny and oppres sion ; to dwell upon a story filled with remonstrances of our kings and their great councils ; broken and eluded laws ; the un regarded complaints and petitions of the clergy ; the unpitied cries of a nation ; and, in every line one writes, to feel new pain and bleed afresh in the wounds of our country. In short, a history which one can hardly read with patience, or relate with the calmness and temper that become a Christian, is at best a very discouraging undertaking. Yet one who considers the artifices and address with which our enemies are every day attempting to bring these nations back again to the yoke under which our ancestors so long groaned ; how totally some men have forgot the miseries of those days, and even the late prospect we had of falling under them again ; how fondly some men talk of an union with that church, which can allow no terms of communion but such as must let in a foreign power, and bring servitude along with them; how unhappily some mistake the decency and order of our Holy Mother, and will not believe that she is far enough from popery, because she does not sacrifice all regard to the best ages of the church, and run into novelty to show her aversion to that of Rome ; — will easily be persuaded, that the advantages would on many accounts over-balance the difficulties which attend a work of this kind. Had we as plain a view of the use whieh the court of Eome made of their power *, as, I hope, the following history will give of the unworthy arts by which they gained it ; could we see how the wealth of the nation was exhausted to enrich her enemies ; all the measures of law and justice, and even the religion of Christ, forced to give way to avarice and ambition ; the sacred patrimony of the English church made the reward of those who first enslaved it ; and at once behold the difference betwixt the purity, the decency, the order, and the gentleness of our Holy Mother, and the corruptions, the foppery, the superstition and tyranny of 1 Made of their power.] This service, I may remark, is designed to be answered, in some degree, by the earlier portions of the present collection. 28 THE BRITISH CHURCH; AND THE ANGLICAN. Rome ; — a work of this nature would give us a lively view of the blessings of the Reformation, and raise up so just a veneration for that church, which has hitherto through the blessing of God continued its greatest ornament and support, as might possibly cure the mistakes which so unhappily divide us, or at least teach us all such forbearance of one another in love, that our divisions and animosities may never provoke God to take his blessings from us. INTRODUCTION. KING HENRY IT. ; AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET '. The affairs of the king (Henry II.) being in a very good posture, he was at leisure to make his progress in England, and in the year 1159 to go over into France, and set up his preten sions to the earldom of Thoulouse. But whilst things went thus quietly in England, pope Adrian died, which occasioned a new schism 2 in the church of Rome. The haughtiness and ambition of pope Adrian were so suitable to the present views of the court of Rome, that it is not easy to determine whether that prelate was inspired from his court, or actuated by the ambition of his own nature. But from whatever principle he moved, it is very evident that his whole conduct was much of a piece. His rescript to king Henry and bold claim to a sovereignty over all Christian islands s were dictated by the same spirit, which every where appears in his transactions with 1 Archbishop Becket.] From Inetf s Origines Anglicante, vol. ii. p. 235 — 51. 272—83. 286, 7. 2 A new schism.] Of these schisms in the church of Rome, their effects, &c, see Inett, vol. ii. p. 77—81. 140. 138—70. 3 Christian islands.] "Thekyng" (Henry II.) "wrote to P. Adrian of his purpose to reduce the Irishe nation to better religion. The pope in his rescripte did well commende his good zeale, and councelled hym to go for- warde ; but with this proviso, that because (saith he) all ilandes that be turned to the fayth belong to the ryghts of S. Peter and the most holy churche of Rome, the lande shoulde pay yerely to S. Peter for every house a pennye. ... So that whosoever take payne and coste to set any nation in order, or to bryng them to better beliefe, the pope would lose nothyng thereby : where yet tyll that tyme, his fatherhood dyd most strangely suffer 30 KING HENRY II. ; the empire. And it was easy to foresee that the designs of the court of Rome would not die with pope Adrian ; therefore the emperor Frederick, taking the advantage of the present vacancy, employed all his interest in that court to secure such an election as might be consistent with the peace of the empire. On the other hand, the governing part of that court, which was hitherto animated by the spirit of Gregory the Seventh, cast their thoughts another way, and this created such difficulties in the election of pope Adrian's successor, as ended in a schism ; for the court party chose cardinal Rowland late chancellor of the church of St. Peter in Rome, who took the name of Alexander the Third ; whilst the imperial faction chose cardinal Octavian, who took upon him the name of Victor the Fourth. The warmth of the several parties was much alike, and with equal assurance they mutually pretended to the right of election. The kings of England and France acknowledged the title of Alexander, whilst the emperor favoured Victor, and gave such uneasiness to pope Alexander, as obliged him to run the hazard of a voyage by sea to get into France, where we must leave him, till we meet him at the council of Tours, about three years after his advancement to the papacy, concerting measures with Becket then archbishop of Canterbury, for which the king of England had no reason to thank him. The public business detaining the king (1160) in Normandy, Theobald archbishop of Canterbury had the greatest hand in all the affairs of the English church, and by his wisdom and good conduct things went on so smoothly, that, except the common changes which death is ever making, the three or four last years of that prelate's government afford nothing but the building of monasteries, the increase of the religious, and such other occur rences as the historian of the state is chiefly concerned to ac count for. But after that prelate had filled that chair for two-and-twenty years, he died about the middle of April in the beginning of this year (1161), and by his death made way for a successor of a very different temper. The king was in Normandy at the time of that people so outrageously to live, tyll the kyng tooke to the reformation." Archbishop Parker, in the (anonymous) Defence of Priests' Marriages, p. 344. 4to. For a further account of this pretended grant of Ireland by pope Adrian, see Inett, vol. ii. p. 227 — 31. and 279. given below. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 31 Theobald's death, and was attended by Thomas archdeacon of Canterbury, whose services there were so necessary to him, that whatever thoughts he might have of his succession, that chair was not filled till the year following. The king having determined to put that important trust into the hands of his present chancellor, in order thereto he sent him into England, where, by the appointment of Henry the father, his son Henry, lately crowned king of England, summoned a council to meet at London ; and the prior and some of the monks of Canterbury being commanded to attend that assembly, the said prior and monks, with the concurrence of the bishops of the province, elected Thomas Becket \ provost of Beverly, arch deacon of Canterbury and lord chancellor of England, arch bishop. To fit him for that great station he was ordained priest on Trinity Sunday this year (1162), and in the beginning of June following was consecrated bishop, by Henry bishop of Win chester, assisted by several other bishops of the province. This prelate was the son of a merchant, and born in London, and is said to be the first Englishman advanced to the see of Canter bury since the Norman conquest. He was at this time the great favourite and minister of Henry the Second, and at his desire chosen archbishop ; and as chancellor he had acquitted himself so much to the satisfaction of the king and the court, that from his great complaisance and address in that post, the king had formed a mighty expectance, and promised himself a freedom from the disputes and broils, which the stiffness of Anselm and some other of this prelate's predecessors had drawn upon the kingdom. But the king too soon saw himself deceived, and the ground of his hopes turned back upon him. For no sooner did that prelate change his character, but his air and address became new too, and his conversation and conduct had a turn so different from what they appeared before, as too plainly showed the king he had 1 Thomas Becket.] " Thomas a Becket. This is a small error ; but being so often repeated, deserveth to be observed and corrected. The name of that archbishop was Thomas Becket ; nor can it otherwise have been found to be written in any authentic history, record, calendar, or other book. If the vulgar did formerly, as it doth now, call him Thomas a Becket, their mistake is not to be followed by learned men." Henry Wharton's Observa tions subjoined to Strype's Memorials of Archbishop Cranmer ; Appendix, p. 256. 32 KING HENRY II. ; misplaced his hopes and favours, and that there wanted nothing but opportunity and instructions from the court of Rome, to render this prelate the fittest instrument to consummate that usurpation which was already become insupportable to the church and kingdom; and the trusts which he had passed through, served only to increase and give still greater reason for the suspicion and fears of the king. However, things passed quietly the first year. Pope Alexander the Third, as has been said before, finding himself very uneasy at Rome, and by the power of the emperor Frederick, who had espoused the interest of his rival pope Victor the Fourth, so shut up in Italy, that he could not without great difficulty keep up a correspondence with France, England, or Spain ; and having for that reason ground to suspect, that the emperor might bring those nations over to his adversary ; at least make such impressions as might be to his disadvantage ; he left Rome, and sailed to France ; and the better to concert measures with the clergy of France and England, called a council, which met at Tours in France about Whitsuntide this year (1 163). This put so colourable an opportunity into the hands of the new archbishop of Canterbury, to concert measures for the car rying on what his after conduct gives one reason to think he had before projected, that he could not overlook it. Therefore he applied himself to the king, and having obtained his leave, he, accompanied by Roger archbishop of York and the bishop of Durham a, went over into France. Pope Alexander received the archbishop of Canterbury with all the marks of honour and esteem ; and in return, if we may rely on the authority of Neu- brigensis, he secretly resigned his archbishopric, because, as that author saith, he had received his mvestiture from the hands of the king b ; and then took it back again from the hands of the pope c. Baronius agrees that he resigned his bishopric to pope Alex ander, but fixes the resignation after the council of Clarendon when that prelate fled into France d, and says, the reason of this resignation was for that his conscience was troubled, because he chiefly owed his election to the archbishopric to the favour of the * Baron. Annal. ann. 1163. N. 2. b Gul. Neubrig. [William of Newburg] lib. ii. cap. 16. « Ibid d Baron. Annal. ann. 1163. N. 19. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 33 king a. And herein Baronius follows the writers of his life ; and if he be not mistaken in the time he fixed for this affair, it is very probable he is not mistaken in the reason and true ground thereof. For beside the many papal canons which had been made upon that subject, King Henry the First did in the year 1107 give up his right to the investiture of bishops1, and it does ¦ Annal. ann. 1164. N. 30. 1 Investiture of Bishops.] " The king's" (Henry I.) " contests with the church, concerning the right of investiture, (A.D. 1108) were more obstinate and more dangerous. As this is an affair that troubled all Europe as well as England, and holds deservedly a principal place in the story of those times, it will not be impertinent to trace it up to its original. In the early times of Christianity, when religion was only drawn from its obscurity to be persecuted ; when a bishop was only a candidate for martyrdom ; neither the preferment, nor the right of bestowing it, were sought with great ambition. Bishops were then elected, and often against their desire, by their clergy and people; the subordinate ecclesiastical districts were provided for in the same manner. After the Roman empire became Christian, this usage, so generally established, still maintained its ground. However, in the principal cities, the emperor frequently exercised the privilege of giving a sanction to the choice and some times of appointing the bishop; though, for the most part, the popular election still prevailed. But when the Barbarians, after destroying the empire, had at length submitted their necks to the gospel, their kings and great men, full of zeal and gratitude to their instructors, endowed the church with large territories and great privileges. In this case it is but natural that they should be the patrons of those dignities, and nominate to that power, which arose from their own free bounty. Hence the bishoprics in the greatest part of Europe became in effect, whatever some few might have been in appearance, merely donative. And as the bishoprics formed so many seigniories, when the feudal establishment was completed, they partook ofthe feudal nature, so far as they were subjects capable of it ; homage and fealty were required on the part of the spiritual vassal ; the king on his part gave the bishop the investiture, or livery and seizin of his temporalities, by the de livery of a ring and staff. This was the original manner of granting feudal property, and something like it is still practised in our base-courts. Pope Adrian confirmed this privilege to Charlemagne by an express grant. The clergy of that time, ignorant, but inquisitive, were ready at finding types and mysteries in every ceremony : they construed the staff into an emblem of the pastoral care, and the ring into a type of the bishop's allegorical marriage with his church ; and therefore supposed them designed as emblems of a jurisdiction merely spiritual. The papal pretensions increased with the general ignorance and superstition ; and the better to support these preten sions, it was necessary at once to exalt the clergy extremely, and, by breaking off all ties between them and their natural sovereigns, to attach them wholly to the Roman see. In pursuance of this project, the pope first strictly for bade the clergy to receive investitures from laymen, or to do them homage. vox. I. D 34 KING HENRY II. ; not appear that this usage was resumed either by king Stephen or by the present king. But it is very evident that the court of Rome began about this time to be very impatient of allowing princes any share in the election of bishops ; and the archbishop's A council held at Rome entirely condemned this practice : and the condem nation was the less unpopular, because the investiture gave rise to frequent and flagrant abuses, especially in England, where the sees were on this pretence with much scandal (often) held long in the king's hands, and afterwards as scandalously and publicly sold to the highest bidder. So it had been in tbe last reign, and so it continued in this. " Henry, though vigorously attacked, with great resolution maintained the rights of his crown with regard to investitures, whilst he saw the emperor, who claimed a right of investing the pope himself, subdued by the thunder of the Vatican. His chief opposition was within his own kingdom. Anselm, archbishop of Canterbury, a man of unblamable life, and of learning for his time, but blindly attached to the rights of the church, real or supposed, refused to consecrate those who received investitures from the king. The parties appealed to Rome. Rome, unwilling either to recede from her pre tensions or to provoke a powerful monarch, gives a dubious answer. Mean while the contest grows hotter : Anselm is obliged to quit the kingdom, but is still inflexible. At last the king, who, from the delicate situation of his affairs in the beginning of his reign, had been obliged to temporize for a long time, by his usual prudent mixture of management with force, obliged the pope to a temperament, which seemed extremely judicious. The king re ceived homage and fealty from his vassal : the investiture, as it was generally understood to relate to spiritual jurisdiction, was given up, and on this equal bottom peace was established. The secret of the pope's moderation was this : he was at that juncture close pressed by the emperor, and it might be highly dangerous to contend with two such enemies at once ; and he was much more ready to yield to Henry, who had no reciprocal demands on him, than to the emperor, who had many and just ones, and to whom he could not yield any one point, without giving up an infinite number of others very material and interesting. " As the king extricated himself happily from so great an affair, so all the other difficulties of his reign only exercised without endangering him." Burke's Essay towards an Abridgment of the English History. Works, vol. x. p. 437. 8vo. 1812. This is the best concise account I have seen of Henry's struggle in the question of the investiture. But looking at the turn of some of the expres sions, it may not be improper to remind my reader, that Burke, at least at the time when this work was written, was a Roman Catholic. On the same dispute, see also Southey's Book of the Church, vol. i. p. 128 — 31. 134,5. 137,8. edit. 1824; an exact and masterly compendium, which, with Blunt's History of the Reformation, ought to be in the hands of every young person of suitable condition in the kingdom. Consult also, for the general history of this question, Inett, vol. ii. p. 24 7, 92—101, 104—9, and 238, &c, part ofthe extract now before us. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 35 pretence of being troubled in conscience1, for being advanced by the interest and recommendation of the king, was at this time 1 Troubled in conscience.] It will be right here to turn to Inett's account of the previous practice of the church of England in the appointment of bishops, and of what took place in the cases of the four immediate prede cessors of Becket : "The elections of bishops had hitherto ever had their beginning from the crown. The method observed from the Conquest had been this : When soever the see of Canterbury became void, the time of filling it was governed by the pleasure of the king ; and when he had first resolved upon disposing that great trust, he sent his summons to the prior and convent of Canterbury, to depute some of their body to attend him at some meeting of a great council, to assist in the choice of an archbishop, where, with the advice of that assembly and the suffrage of the bishops of the province, a person nominated by the king was usually chosen. Thus Lanfranc, and Anselm, and William, the three preceding archbishops, were advanced to that great station. " But in the summons of the legate (Alberic, bishop of Ostia) to the afore said council of Westminster (December A.D. 1138), directed to Jeremy the prior, and the convent of Canterbury, that prelate requires that the prior, with a number of the convent, sufficiently empowered for the election of an archbishop, should attend upon the council. Nor was he content thus to break in upon the rights of the crown in making the first step in this affair ; but in the same instrument he tells the prior that their election being thus made, and consented to by the bishops of the province, the king cannot and ought not in justice to deny his consent. Such an insult upon the rights of the crown was too open to be overseen by the king (Stephen), but the ill posture of his government made him wink at it; and his brother the bishop of Winchester had set his heart upon Canterbury, and was not to provoke the legate, who by the bold and insolent manner in which he had set the business of the election into motion, without the knowledge of the king, had given ground to believe that the conduct of that affair would fall into his hands. " But it happened here as it generally does when some present views lead men out of the ways of law and justice. The compliment made to the bishops of the province in asserting their rights to a vote in the choice of their own metropolitan served only to render their rights an easier prey, by separating them from the rights of the crown. — Such was the case of the convent too. Neither did the king nor his brother find their accounts in this matter. The king was afraid to trust a new accession of power in the hands of his brother, whose authority in his capacity of legate had already overshadowed the royal power ; and therefore, notwithstanding the passion of his brother for the vacant chair, the king secretly favoured the interest of Theobald, abbot of Bee in Normandy : and this so influenced the election, that Theobald was chosen archbishop of Canterbury." Inett, vol. ii. p. 179, 80. Compare Twisden's Vindication, p. 54, thus: "Our writers do wholly look upon the placing of Lanfranc in Canterbury as the king's act, though it D 2 36 KING HENRY II.; the highest and most acceptable strain of courtship that could be made to the court of Rome, which began every where to pre tend to be supreme patrons as well as ordinaries of the church, and, in order thereunto, pretended to a mighty zeal for asserting the rights of capitular elections1. Beside what was publicly owned and transacted at the council of Tours, it seems very probable, that a design was there formed to make the clergy of the Western churches, as far as it was possible, a body separate and independent on the civil powers, and that measures wer,e concerted and agreed upon in order thereto : at least thus much is evident, that he who preached the sermon at the opening of that council, and which is inserted in the his tory of Baronius, saith, that the unity of the church, then en gaged in a schism, and the liberties of the clergy, were the busi ness of that assembly " ; and he pressed both with such equal passion and warmth, that it is not easy to determine, which of the two that orator was most concerned to recommend to that assembly : for, as he tells them, that " the church had not a being if it was not one ;" so he tells them, that " without liberty the church must be miserable, and to be miserable and not to be were much the same ; nay," saith he, " it is worse to be miserable than not to be at all b." Such stress was that council taught to put upon the new ecclesiastic liberty. Accordingly, when the dispute on that subject broke out in England, the archbishop pretended to entitle God to the liberties he contested for, and in the management of that controversy was so entirely governed by the court of Rome, that in his letters to the king and to the bishops of England, written during his exile, he says, that his letters were perused and allowed by the bishop of Rome", before he sent them. And the zeal, with which that eourt defended that prelate when alive, and prosecuted his ene- were not without the advice of Alexander II. Neither did Anselm ever make scruple of accepting the archbishopric, because he was not chosen by the monks of Canterbury." For the earliest case of concession by a king of England, in a dispute of this nature, which was by king Stephen (A.D. 1141), in reference to the see of York, see Inett, vol. ii. p. 188 — 90; and for the practice in the appointment of bishops in earlier times, see a long note from Inett given below under king John, &c. 1 Capitular elections.] See index, under Capitular elections. See also Inett, vol. ii. p. 188—90. 365—75. 403—10. * Baron. Annal. ann. 1163. b Ibid. c Hoved. par. poster, foi. 289. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 37 mies, and did honour to his memory when he was dead, make it still more evident that the affair, which about this time gave so much trouble to England, was first formed by the councils and then conducted by the interest of the court of Rome, and in all probability concerted at this interview betwixt the pope and the archbishop. And the commotions which immediately followed the couneil of Tours, still add more weight to the conjecture ; for from this time the histories of the Western nations are so full of the wrangles and broils occasioned by the pretence to ecclesias tic liberty, that iEmilius saith, the controversy on that subject spread itself over the world a- It appears by Baronius b, that the empire, and the kingdoms of Sicily and Hungary, as well as England, were about the same time embroiled by the same con troversy. Some steps this way had been made in England about twenty years before ; for Alberic bishop of Ostia and legate of pope Innocent, taking the advantage of the weakness and troubles of king Stephen's reign, by a canon of the council which he held in Winchester in the year 1138, gave the first light into the designs of the court which sent him ; and was followed therein by Henry bishop of Winchester and legate of the bishop of Rome, at the council held in London in the year 1143 according to Hoveden0, the year preceding according to M. Paris; wherein it was de creed, that whosoever should lay violent hands upon any clergy man, should not be absolved but by the pope himself or in his presence. This canon is somewhat different in M. Paris, but the preamble, the reason, and the consequence of the canon are agreed upon. The pretence which gave beginning to it, was the mischiefs which the clergy then suffered by the civil war ; for the several parties made no difference betwixt them and the laity, but took them prisoners and made them pay for their ransom. But had this matter stopped here, the world had received no trouble by it ; for the favour allowed the clergy by this canon, was little more than what another canon of the same council allowed to those that till the ground, and what the imperial law had generally allowed to merchants and husbandmen in the time of war ; and that is, a security of their persons from outrage and violence. * Paulus .iEmilius de rebus gestis Francorum. b Baron. Annal. ann. 1169. N. 49. c Concil. Brit. vol. ii. p. 47. 38 KING HENRY II.; But this alone was not sufficient to answer the great design, to make the clergy of the Western churches a body separate and independent on the civil power ; which could not be done without delivering them from the authority of their old masters. And the sanctions annexed to the aforesaid canons leave it beyond a doubt, that the security of the clergy was not the only thing which the court of Rome had then in view ; for by carrying the cognizance of such violences as should be offered to them, from the courts of the king of England to the bishop of Rome, and by changing the civil penalty into an ecclesiastic censure, those canons did, in the consequence and effect thereof, declare the clergy of England subjects to the bishop of Rome. And the present conduct of that court was every way answerable ; for though king Henry took such care for the impartial administra tion of justice, that the least wrong to the clergy and religious could not escape unpunished, and the settled state of his govern ment left no room for their fears, yet this was so far from putting an end to the design to exempt the clergy from the secular power, for which the confusions of the last reign had given some colour, that this impartial administration of justice was the chief sup port of those pretences, which disturbed the government of king Henry. The better to engage the clergy and religious, they were flattered into a belief of the honour and advantages which would accrue to themselves and to the church, by being discharged from the secular power. And by this artifice the design of the court of Rome was so well covered, that the clergy generally ran into it, and those of them who meant well, out of a principle of zeal were for the most part the forwardest therein. And the better to raise their zeal and make them sensible of the encouragement they might expect, the archbishop of Canterbury applied himself to pope Alexander for the canonization of the late archbishop Anselm a, who had distinguished himself by attempts against the rights of the kings of England, and who had given the first blow to their authority. And as this would raise a glory to surround the head of that prelate, so it would at the same time tell the clergy the example they were to follow, and give new vigour to their zeal, by brightening the pattern which was set before them. The forwardness of pope Alexander was answerable to the a Angl. sac. par. ii. p. 177. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 39 importance of this design ; therefore a bull, which bears date at Tours, for the canonization of Anselm, was directed to his suc cessor tho new archbishop, with assurance that his proceedings therein should be confirmed by the court of Rome a. And no doubt but the address of that court, which ensnared the body of the clergy, easily possessed the archbishop with an opinion of the great honour which would redound to him, by appearing at the head of those who were to assert the ecclesiastic liberty. But whatever springs the zeal of that prelate had, he was no sooner returned from the council of Tours, but he presently set this pretence into motion; the occasion and circumstances whereof, Hoveden and Brompton, both favourers of the pretence and of the conduct of the archbishop, thus relate. Immediately after the return ofthe archbishop and his brethren from the council of Tours, a great controversy began betwixt the king and the clergy. "The king," saith Brompton b, "being- desirous that justice should be equally and impartially distributed, and having notice given him by his judges, that several outrages, thefts, and murders were committed by the clergy, ordered," saith Hoveden, "that such ofthe clergy as should be taken in felony, robbery, murder, or burning of houses, should be carried before the judges, and punished as the laity were, when found guilt}' of those offences c." On the contrary, the archbishop opposed this proceeding, and asserted, that " whatever faults the clergy should be found guilty of, they were only triable in the ecclesiastical court, and before the judges thereof." The bishops and clergy of the province of Canterbury, in a synodical epistle written to pope Alexander4, give much the same account of this affair. " The king," say they, "seeing the peace of his kingdom much disturbed by the enormous excesses of some of the clergy, and not thinking the degrading of them for murder and other enormous crimes a punishment sufficient to answer the guilt, or to preserve the public peace ; he caused the laws observed by ecclesiastic persons in the days of his prede cessors to be drawn into a body, and appointed that such of the clergy as offended might be punished according to those laws :" * Angl. sac. par. ii. p. 177. b Brompton (apud Twisden) Histories Anglicanse Scriptores decern, col. 1058. N. 50. c Hoved. Annal. par. poster, foi. 2S2. d Ejusd. Annal. ann. 1167. foL 293. 40 KING HENRY II.; whereas say they on the other side, the clergy insisted on then- being punishable by the ecclesiastic laws only. And as the king had the advantage in point of right, liaving the law and usage of England on his side, he had the advantage also in the manage ment of this controversy ; for whilst the address on the other side was fierce and impetuous, and carried on with very indecent reflections, the king, says the same provincial letter, on his side managed this dispute with all possible respect and veneration to the clergy a. " This," say they, " was the cruelty, whieh has made such a noise in the world; this the persecution, this the wickedness, which have been so much clamoured against." Whereas, says the same synodical epistle, as the king had declared he had no thoughts of lessening the honour of the clergy or the rights of the church, so he has promised, that if it appear that the aforesaid laws are any way prejudicial to the welfare or good of souls, or dishonourable to the church, he was ready to make such alterations, as with the advice of the clergy of his kingdom should be thought fit. There were some other collateral branches of this dispute ; as whether there lay any appeals1 from the king's courts, or whether bishops might go out of the kingdom without his leave ; but the stress of this controversy was, in short, whether the king had any authority over ecclesiastic persons or in causes ecclesiastical. But because this affair did not only at this time divide the Western churches, but has remained a subject of dispute to after-ages, and the honour of the English church and nation, and the justice and authority of the kings of England, have a great share therein ; before I enter upon the relation of this controversy, it may not be amiss to look backward, and to observe the laws and practice of the preceding ages, in the particular under question. Religion has so just and undoubted a right to the most profound veneration and regard, that the ministers thereof never did and never can want a due respect, but where religion itself wants a due influence and authority on the minds of men. For the honour of religion, and of those to whose conduct the interest and ministry of holy things are committed, stand upon the same » Hoved. Annal. ann. 1167. foi. 293. 1 Any appeals.] See Twisden's Historical Vindication, p. 28 — 38 : also Barrow on the Pope's Supremacy, p. 417 — 37. 4to. 1680; and Inett, vol. ii. p. 1 95,6. 280,1 . 376,7. a part of the present extract ; and see also Index, under Appeals lo Rome. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 41 foot, viz. the honour of God, and cannot fail but with the foun dation upon which they are built ; and as they flow from the same common fountain, and stand or fall together, so they ever bear proportion to one another. Therefore the same holy warmth, which accompanied the first ages of the gospel, did also induce Christian princes to grant great privileges and immunities to the ministers thereof. They were excused from all those personal services which might be burthensome to them, or which might withdraw them from the offices of their holy function, or render them little in the eyes of men a ; and their estates were exempted from many charges and burthens, to which the estates of other men were subject b. Nor did the favours to the ministers of Christ stop here, but Christian princes entrusted them with all the power that was necessary to serve the ends of peace and charity and holiness "¦ Yet religion was never thought to strip princes of any of those rights, which nature and the ends of government have put into their hands. On the contrary, from the time that the gospel became the religion of the empire, all the concerns and interests thereof were taken under the care of the civil power, and so many laws relating to ecclesiastical persons and causes were made by the imperial authority, that they take up a great deal of room in the body of laws collected by the appointment of the emperor Justinian. In short, those laws take cognizance of sacred things, persons, and causes. They determine when new churches shall be built, and how supported ; how the rectors thereof should subsist ; and appoint that their maintenance shall be sacred and inalienable d ; to whom the patronage of churches shall belong, and by what measures that right should be conducted e ; how the bishop shall demean himself, if an unworthy man shall be presented f ; what articles of faith should be esteemed catholics; who shall be deemed heretics, and how punished h ; and who shall be esteemed catholics *- By the same authority too councils were convened, and the canons thereof confirmed and published. Particularly the im perial law determines that the councils of Nice, Ephesus, Chalce- - Codic. lib. i. tit. 2. secfe-6. b Ejusd. N. 5. 7. II. " Ejusd. tit. 4. sect. 7, 8. d Novel. 7. tit. 1. prsefat. e Novel. 123. cap. 18. f Codic. lib. i. tit. 1. sect. 1. * Ejusd. sect. 5. h Codic. lib. i. tit. 1. 6. '' Novel. 7. tit. 1. prsefat. 42 KING HENRY II. ; don, and Constantinople should be received, and that the books written by Porphyry against the Christian religion should be burnt"; that Nestorius, Eutyches, Apollinaris, and their fol lowers, should be esteemed heretics b. As the imperial authority thus acted in matters relating to religion and holy things, so it judged of persons too. It deter mined that every city should have its own bishop, and how far his diocese should extend c ; how persons should be qualified that were admitted to holy orders d ; how the lower clergy, the monks, the bishops, the metropolitans, the patriarchs, should behave themselves : and by convening the bishops of the whole Christian church to the eight first general councils by the emperors, the world has one comprehensive and undeniable proof of the autho rity of princes over all ecclesiastical persons, received and owned by the universal church. Ecclesiastical causes were no less the subject of the imperial authority. The laws of the empire direct that synods shall be yearly called, to consider of the matters of faith and discipline e ; that the judgment and sentences of those assemblies should be conducted by the canons of the church and by the laws of the empire f ; that the disputes amongst diocesan bishops should be determined by their proper metropolitan and two assessors5; if they cannot determine them, then by the archbishop or patri arch h ; that all causes of the clergy should be finally determined in the provinces wherein they arise1, and that the clergy should not be called out of the province where they live to any foreign tribunal ; and in what manner causes ecclesiastical shall be con ducted, to whom the cognizance thereof does in the first instance belong, by what steps appeals shall proceed, and whose sentence shall be final and unappealable k. The same laws direct how a suit betwixt a layman and a clergyman shall be managed ; and in case a layman shall com mence a suit in the court of a bishop, and either party does not acquiesce in the sentence thereof, that then the cause may be re heard by the civil judge 1 ; how metropolitans and bishops should be punished, if they neglect to convene their provincial or diocesan * Codic. fib. i. tit. 1. sect. 3. K Ejusd. sect. 5. ' Ejusd. tit. 3. 36. a Novel. 6. tit. 6. cap. 4, 5. • Novel. 123. tit. 6. cap. 10. 22. ' Ibid. e Ibid. h Ibid. ' Codic. lib. i. tit. 4. sect. 29. k Ibid. 1 Novel. 123. cap. 22. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 43 synods " ; how a bishop should be punished, if absent a year from his diocese without the leave of the emperor b, or, if he excom municate a person without showing cause ; how a deposed bishop should be treated, if he attempt to disturb the public peace c. And which is still more, the greatest part, and probably every one, of the aforesaid laws were made by the emperors with the advice of their bishops, and without any complaint were universally obeyed by the clergy and religious ; yet, at the time of making those laws, the bounds of Christendom and the empire were much the same. So that one who looks backwards to the first Christian emperors, and to the greatest and best bishops and clergy that ever served in the Christian church, and finds so many laws on the one side, and such dutifulness and obedience on the other, cannot but stand amazed at an attempt to withdraw the clergy and religious from the authority of the civil government, which at this time gave so much trouble to the English church and nation. If one was to run over the laws and histories of Europe after the fall of the empire, the case will appear still the same. — But to judge truly of the present controversy, it will concern us to look at home, and view the practice of our ancient English- Saxon ancestors '. — Though the assertion of that learned gentle man d, who affirms that a third part of the land of England was in possession of the clergy, at the time of the Norman conquest, cannot be allowed, yet there is no reason to doubt what that writer and M. Paris before him say of the great tenderness and regard, with which they were ever treated under" the Saxon go vernment ; wherein the aforesaid learned writer observes, they held their lands by Frank Almonage, and subject to no duties and impositions, but such as they laid upon themselves in ecclesiastical assemblies e. Whether this be wholly true, I shall not inquire ; but it is certain, that their lands were excused from many of those burthens, to which other lands were subject ; that the bishops had a great share both in the legislature and in the administration of justice ; they were called to and had places in the great council ; and, beside the proper authority allowed to " Novel. 6. tit. 6. cap. 2. b Novel. 123. cap. 10. c Codic. lib. i. tit. 3. sect. 14. 1 An excellent edition of the Anglo-Saxon laws has now been published by the Commissioners of Records, under the care of Mr. T. Thorpe. d Sir Will. Temple, Introduct. Engl. Hist. p. 175. " Ibid. 44 KING HENRY II.; them in right of their function, they were standing judges in the county and hundred courts a, and a mighty deference was ever paid to their judgment, as well in civil as in ecclesiastical affairs. Yet, after all, the privileges they enjoyed are so far from proving the English clergy and religious a body distinct and independent upon the state, that they demonstrate they ever were and ever esteemed themselves a part of the body politic, and owed a subjection to their princes and obedience to their laws. For it was by the authority of their princes that the bishops were convened to all state councils, and it was in obedience to their laws that they presided and judged in the courts of justice ; and under these laws it was, that the clergy of England challenged all the privileges they enjoyed ; and all sides acted up to these notions of the rights of the civil power. King Ina published a body of ecclesiastic laws b, and therein directs the duty of the clergy and religious. The laws of king Alfred are particular and express in directing the punishment of a clergyman who should be found guilty of murder c. And the dialogue of Egbert archbishop of York shows that this had been the usage of England long before the reign of that prince, not only in the case of murder, but also of adultery and theft a. He adds too, that the violence of a layman to the person of a bishop, a presbyter, a deacon, or a monk, was punishable by the secular power e. Edgar followed the example of Ina and Alfred, and in his laws directs the affairs of religion f, and was so far from thinking that the character of his bishops discharged them from the obliga tion of his laws, that he commands them to assist in person in the two annual county courts g. Nor did that prince only extend his laws to the clergy, but he published a body of canons for the good government of the church h, wherein he directs the conduct of the ecclesiastic discipline, in almost all the parts and branches thereof. King Canutus also has his body of ecclesiastic laws *. And the gentle laws of Edward the Confessor, which the clergy, and indeed the whole nation, so passionately desired under the Norman government, are no less full and plain in directing the affairs of the church k : and in a law of that prince, directing the form of - Concil. Brit. vol. i. p. 447. b Ibid. p. 182. c Lambard. de leg. p. 27. d Egb. dialog, p. 273. ' Ejusd. p. 276. < Concil. Brit. vol. i. p. 446. e Lambard. de leg. p. 65. h Concil. Brit. vol. i. p. 447. 1 Ejusd. p. 538. k Lambard. de leg. p. 138. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 45 judicial proceedings, he requires that the advocates of the clergy should be first heard in his courts of judicature". King William the First went on in the same steps, and by his authority first established the ecclesiastical courts b ; and was so exactly followed herein by his successors, that in a synodical epistle of the bishops and clergy of the province of Canterbury to pope Alexander the Third, they tell that prelate, that the laws which occasioned the controversy betwixt the king and Thomas, at this time archbishop of Canterbury, " were the ancient laws of the kings of England °." So that, upon the whole matter, the judgment and practice of the Western church in general, and of the English church in particular, are so evident, that it is impos sible for one who knows any thing of antiquity to make a doubt whether the clergy were anciently subject to the temporal laws of princes, or whether things of ecclesiastical nature were within the cognizance of their courts. I have led the reader thus far, partly to give him some idea of the nature and importance of those rights and powers which the kings of England had anciently enjoyed, and of which king Henry the Second was now in possession ; partly to do right to the English church and nation, by showing how unjustly their enemies place the resolutions and laws of our princes and then- great councils, relating to the affairs of the church and clergy, amongst the faults of the Reformation ; (for if this be the fault of our government, it is a fault which has the best antiquity for example, and such as the best princes and the wisest nations have gloried in ;) and partly to give the reader a just view of that design which was set on foot about this time, to break in upon the authority of the king of England, and to invade the rights of the crown ; the manner and circumstances whereof, the steps by which it was advanced, the actors therein and the pur poses which were served by it, the course of our story brings us now to consider. To set this matter in such a light as may appear free from the bias and impressions which the concern for the honom- of one's country might possibly lead one into, I must again ask the reader's leave to remind him of the occasion of this dispute, as it ¦ Lambard. de leg. p. 138. b Concil. Brit. vol. ii. p. 14. c Hoved. Annal. ann. 1167. foi. 293. N. 20. 46 KING HENRY II.; is related by the writers of archbishop Becket's life, and from them by Baronius. Neubrigensis, honestly and bluntly giving an account of this controversy" says, that archbishop Becket (1163) would not permit a clergyman to suffer according to law, and that this was the occasion of the misunderstanding betwixt him and the king. Baronius undertakes to blame that writer for this account, and from the writers of the archbishop's life gives us a relation of that matter somewhat different b. The archbishop, saith he, being returned from the council of Tours, was received very kindly by the king, but afterward fell under his displeasure, for applying himself to recover something which his predecessors had lost from his see, and endeavouring to prevail with the king to fill up some bishoprics then void ; for laying down his chancellorship, " and denying the right of the crown to raise money on the clergy ; for sending away a priest to a monastery, who was convicted of murder and degraded, that he might not be punished by the secular arm';" and when Philip, a canon, was convicted of the same crime, for sending him away, though the king had commanded he should be punished accord ing to law, the archbishop "denying that these or any other clergyman was punishable in any other manner than by the cen sures of the church." This is the account which Baronius, from the aforesaid writers, gives of the controversy which lies now before us. The king, adds the same learned writer, apprehending that such proceedings might increase the wickedness of the clergy, did very earnestly desire " that clergymen, who offended in any heinous manner, might be degraded, and then delivered to the secular power to be punished as the offence deserved." But, as he ob serves, " this was utterly denied by the archbishop and some other bishops d ; at which," saith he, " the king was exceedingly angry." And great reason he had to be so, and more especially if we add what Neubrigensis saith e, that " above one hundred homicides were committed by the clergy under the reign of the king, and that their bishops were much more vigilant to protect them from the law, than to punish their disorders f." But, after all, one has much ado to forbear saying, that all these accounts are still defective, and come very short of the true rea- ¦ Neubrig. lib. ii. cap. 15, 16. b Baron. Annal. ann. 1163. N. 29. ' Ejusd. N. 30. d Ejusd. N. 31. • Neubrig. lib. ii. cap. 16. f Ibid. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 47 son of this controversy ; for though there can be no doubt that the persons mentioned by the aforesaid writers were singled out by the king as fit subjects for his justice, yet it is very evident these instances are the least part of the provocation which the government had received ; for the outrages committed by the clergy were very numerous, and the contempt and insults of the civil authority were open and avowed, and both the mischief and the impunity were of older date than the advancement of arch bishop Becket. So that it was not so much the faults of particular men, as a general licentiousness of the clergy, together with their contempt of the civil authority, founded on a pretence that they were not accountable to the secular power, which gave beginning to, and which was the true basis and foundation of, this unhappy controversy. Whilst the dispute about the ecclesiastic liberty was thus going on in England, the court of Rome had so managed their affairs in Italy and Germany, that the emperor Frederick, the great opposer of the designs of that court, was reduced to such circumstances, that pope Alexander called a council to meet in the Lateran, 1 1 68, where he took upon himself to excommunicate and depose that prince, and absolve the subjects of Italy from their obe dience ; and the reasons given in that sentence were, because he had espoused the interests of the anti-pope a- And John of Salisbury, from whom this account of this council is taken, saith, that pope Alexander herein followed the example of Gregory the Seventh, and concludes the paragraph with words very dark ; but if they have any meaning at all, it is this ; " that the safety of the church being established in the head thereof, there was just ground to believe the like success would attend that prelate in the dispute relating to the church of England b ; " that is, in plain English, there was reason to believe that the court, which had humbled the emperor Frederick, would subdue the king of England. Though the court of Rome was exceedingly elated with their success against Frederick, and the king of England had little reason to hope for any good issue thereof, yet that he might not be wanting to his cause, by a new embassy to Rome, he attempted to prevail with pope Alexander, to translate the archbishop » Concil. torn. x. ann. 1168. Ed. Lab. col. 1449. b Ibid. 48 KING HENRY II. ; Becket to some other see, and to remove him from France to Rome a. And knowing the debts the see of Rome had contracted in opposing the designs of the emperor Frederick, the king offered pope Alexander to pay his debts, and that he would give him ten thousand marks b, in case he was gratified in his desire, and the archbishop translated to some other see. Though the desire of the king was not granted, yet by those great presents, and greater offers which he made, the king prevailed so far, that he chained up the fury of the archbishop for another year, and obtained the sending of Gratian, nephew to pope Eugenius, and Vivian, advocate of Rome, to mediate a peace c. These legates made some progress in the accommodation, but were not able to complete it ; but discovered a secret, which the king had before but too much reason to suspect. For when the king, tired with the ill-usage he had received, said in anger, he would take other measures, the legates replied, " Sir, threaten not ; we fear no threatenings, for we belong to a court that is used to command emperors and kings d." This insolent return of the legates, together with the denials and delays he met with, were enough to let the king into the true sentiments of that artful court with which he had to deal, and to put him out of doubt, that they were resolved to carry their point, and to force him and his laws to submit. Accordingly, when after several conferences a form of agreement was drawn up, wherein the king consented to restore the archbishop to his see, and to all the rights thereof in such manner as he enjoyed them before the controversy, "salva dignitate regni sui, — saving the rights of the kingdom ; " this clause spoiled the whole and broke up the conference e, and the legates returned as they came. Upon the breaking up of this assembly, the king dispatched new embas sadors to Rome, and before the end of the year Simon prior de monte Dei and Bernardus de Corilo were sent legates from thence f ; but the king still insisting on the archbishop's promise to observe his laws, this effort also came to nothing s. The king (1 1 70) appearing thus steady and resolute in the defence of his right, the court of Rome came at last to a resolution a Baron. Annal. ann. 1169. N. 1. b Ibid. ° Ejusd. N. 5. a Ejusd. N. 11. e Baron. Annal. ann. 1169. N. 17, 18. » Ejusd. N. 30. * Ejusd. N. 31. 33. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 49 to try extremities. In the mean time they set themselves to prepare the minds of men to bear so violent a shock to the natural and undoubted rights of princes, by possessing the world with such a character of the king, and such an opinion of his laws, as might if possible bring men to think he had merited the hardships that were or should be put upon him ; or at least might so artfully cover their own designs, that the neighbouring princes might stand still, and quietly see their authority humbled in the example of the king of England. To bring this about, the king was represented as " a tyrant, an oppressor, a violator of the rights of the church," and, in the writings of the archbishop and his party, frequently mentioned under the title of Pharaoh a : and in the common language of that party, " the customs of England were styled pravities, and its laws represented as tyran nical and wicked b, repugnant to the honour of God c, and destruc tive to the rights and liberties of his church d." On the other hand, the cause of Becket was represented as the cause of God and of his church e, and the mortification, humility and holiness of the archbishop every where magnified, and he himself styled a martyr and defender of the cause of God and of his church f, and his name inserted into the offices of the great monasteries of France s : and a decretal bull of pope Alexander was published, against such prelates as adhered to the laws of their own country under the title of court-bishops, wherein " that prelate excites all bishops to defend the ecclesiastic liberty 1," and for their encourage ment saith, there were two things for which every Christian ought " Baron. Annal. ann. 1170. N. 21. b Ejusd. N. 1. c Ibid. d Ibid. « Ejusd. N. 16. 'Ibid. s Ejusd. ann. 1)64. N. 11. 1 The ecclesiastic liberty.] Isaac Casaubon began, and has left behind him an interesting portion of a Treatise De Libertate Ecclesiastica, which promises to have been one of great learning and value ; but he was stopped in his progress by the interposition of the Pope with his patron and master, Henry IV. (Henry, The Great) of France, and was prevented from proceeding. He has defined the subject of his intended work in the following words : — " Ex iis quae hactenus disputata sunt, hoc tandem elicimus, non longe ab hodiernorum pontificii juris doctorum sententia aberraturum, qui Libertatis Ecclesiastical hanc sive descriptionem, sive definitionem contexuerit : Libertas Ecclesiastica jus est quoddam, primarie quidem Pontifici Romano adhasrens, quo universi orbis dominium UH paratur ; secundarie vero Ecclesiasticis, quo viritim et in commune eximuntur ipsi, et bona ipsorum ab omni omnium Prin- cipum subjectione, jurisdictione, potestate : Laid vero ipsis ad omne obsequium redduntur obnoxii." P. 175. A.D. 1709; in Is. Casauboni Epistola, Sfc. foi. vol. i. E 50 KING HENRY II. ; to lay down his life, viz. justice and liberty a; that is, in short, for the cause under debate. The way being thus prepared, pope Alexander recalled the inhibi tion he had before granted, and set the archbishop at liberty to use the censures of the church upon the person of the king. But lest this should speed no better than the former attempts of that angry prelate, pope Alexander did this year constitute Ro- trode archbishop of Rouen, Bernard bishop of Nevers, and William archbishop of Sens, his legates, with power to excommunicate and put the kingdom of England under an interdict 1 : and because he had advice, or at least suspected, that that prince had a secret purpose to have his son Henry crowned king ; the better to break his measures, and put him under a necessity of recalling the archbishop of Canterbury, pope Alexander sent his bull, declaring the crowning of the king the right of that prelate, and forbidding the archbishop of York or any other bishop to intermeddle in that affair without his consent b. This was a fair step towards putting the disposal ofthe crown into the hands ofthe archbishop ; at least it was putting the succession into the same methods, by which the bishops of Rome were now arrived to a pretence of disposing of the empire ; which pretence doubtless had no other original, but the civil respect that was paid to the bishops of Rome, in permitting them to crown the emperor. This inhibition of pope Alexander had not its effect, but, on the contrary, not withstanding it the young king was crowned this year by Roger archbishop of York : yet this disappointment of pope Alexander gave beginning to a new scene of trouble ; for that prelate sus pended the archbishop of York for crowning the new king, and excommunicated the bishops of London, Rochester, and Salisbury as assistants in that solemnity °. And lest the world should mistake the reasons upon which that prelate acted, in the body of the aforesaid bull of suspension he tells the archbishop of York, that the chief reason thereof was " because the new king had sworn inviolably to observe the ancient customs, whereby the dignity of the church was put into danger a." And as he thus used the bishops, so he sent the king word, that if he did not make his agreement with the archbishop " Baron. Annal. ann. 1169. N. 49. 1 An interdict.] See Index, under Interdict. b Hoved. Annal. ann. 1170. foi. 296. N. 40. and foi. 297. c Ibid. a Ibid_ AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 51 of Canterbury by the time which he appointed in his letter, " he would pronounce the same sentence against him, which he had pronounced against the emperor Frederic" :" and by his appro bation the archbishop seconded this impudent and unchristian resolution, with notifying to the king, " that he would put the kingdom under an interdict, if he did not in fifteen days make his peace V The king had a mighty passion for his family, and in the advancement of the late king Stephen to the crown in opposition to the juster title of his mother Maud, and in the controversy which had given him so much trouble and let so many dangers and disquiets in upon him, he was made abundantly sensible, how difficult it would be for a minor to bear up against the pre vailing power of the clergy, headed by the bishop of Rome. The late ill treatment of the emperor Frederic could not but confirm him in this apprehension : and it seems very probable, that con siderations of this kind, together with the vexatious and incurable obstinacy of the archbishop, broke the resolution which the king had hitherto shown in opposing the designs of the court of Rome, and brought this controversy to an issue which was likely to have frustrated all the ends the king hoped to have served by it ; for this agreement, instead of securing the succession, did, by helping to raise the usurpation of the bishops of Rome, enable pope Innocent the Third to depose his son king John, and bade fair for the disinheriting of his family. Whatever were the reasons by which this prince moved in that affair, the writers of Beckefs story generally say, he was frightened into the agreement, as not daring to stand the shock of the interdict and sentence of pope Alexander. Thus much is evident, that an agreement was made the two-and-twentieth of July (1170), being the feast of St Mary Magdalen : by which the king yielded that the archbishop and all his followers should return to England, and peaceably enjoy what they had held before this controversy began ; and this without so much as a promise on the side of the archbishop to observe the laws of England, or so much as the king's presuming to open his mouth for those usages \ " which with so much obstinacy he had before " Baron. Annal. ann. 1170. N. 20. b Ibid. 1 Those usages.] The ancient prerogatives, that is, of the crown of England in ecclesiastical matters, the chief of which had been collected together, and formally recognized in a council convened by the king in the month of E 2 52 KING HENRY II.; defended ;" as that prelate, according to his rude and unchristian manner, relates this affair to pope Alexander a- The king was pleased with this agreement, as princes commonly are, when they are ill-used and insulted by their own subjects. But the archbishop sped worse ; for his success made a wonderful accession to his natural vanity and haughtiness, and at last proved fatal to him. His zeal was now become all fire, and that his opposers might not be kept in suspense what they were to expect from him, before he left Normandy he sent letters of excommunication against Roger archbishop of York for crowning the young king, and together with him the bishops of London and Durham, and all that assisted in that solemnity11 ; the doing whereof, as he pretended, did of right belong to him. The king was sensible of that prelate's design, and endeavoured to prevent it, by appointing men to guard the ports, and seize such persons as they found bringing letters of this kind c. How ever, they arrived safe, and in the beginning of Advent returned the angry prelate himself who had sent them, and who defended them with a fury agreeable to that whieh gave them a beginning. And fire so naturally produceth fire, that it is no wonder if the king was transported beyond the bounds of temper, to see himself affronted in the ill usage of those who had distinguished themselves by a steady zeal for his service ; — and the excommunicated and suspended bishops leaving England, and coming to the king in Normandy, and complaining to him, that the archbishop was grown so imperious that they were not able to live under him, and that when the archbishop came to wait on the young king he came attended by soldiers, and so attended would have entered the king's palace: this (saith the same author) so raised the January 1164, and to which, after some demur, Becket promised obedience, but afterwards revoked his promise, to the great indignation of the king, and the almost universal disapproval of the bishops and great body of the clergy, as well as of the nobles. Hereupon the archbishop withdrew privately into France, where he continued several years under the protection of that court and of the pope, persisting all the while in treating the king in his letters with great insolence. He declares the statutes of Clarendon void, excom municates their abettors, &c, and procures the pope's permission to excom municate the king, if he did not submit very shortly ; engages the French king in a war against Henry, and at length terrifies the king into concession. See these particulars related at large, Inett, vol. ii. p. 253 — 71. a Baron. Annal. ann. 1170. N. 22. b Gervas. Chron. ann. 1170. [X. Script.] col. 1413. N. 30. 40. c Ibid. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 53 indignation of the king, that he said " in passion, he maintained a company of cowardly and slothful men, of which not one would vindicate him from the many injuries which he sustained " :" or as others report his words, that "among all those he maintained or had obliged by his favours, he had none that would vindicate him from one priest that troubled him and his kingdom, and sought to depose and to disinherit him b." The king's domestics thinking themselves reproached by this reflection, were officious beyond their duty and beyond what the king intended; and presently laying hold of these hasty expressions, four of them, viz. Reginald Fitz-Urse, William de Traci, Richard Brito, and Hugh de Morevile, resolved upon the death of the archbishop, and hasting away to England, with all the circumstances of inhumanity, murdered that unhappy prelate in his own Cathedral church, December 28, 1170. The archbishop being thus murdered, the noise which attended it was in some measure answerable to the guilt and horror of the fact ; for as that was barbarous beyond excuse, there wanted no industry to blacken the guilt and to fix it upon the king. On the other hand, the king was sensible of the ill use which would be made of it, and was just to his own honour and innocence ; and to prevent the advantages which his enemies might reap from this occasion, king Henry employed his embassadors every where to assert his innocence. On the other hand, the French ministers aggravated the inhumanity of the deed ; and the court of Rome could not but have reason to fear the consequence of this affair, as that which in the first view appeared very likely to intimi date their partisans, and make them cold in a design wherein that prelate had so fatally miscarried: therefore that court employed their emissaries to represent the horror of the fact, and used their eloquence to give the world such an idea thereof, as might beget impressions fitted to the purposes which they designed to serve by it. Nor did their exclamations set bounds to the dis pleasure of that court ; but as they were very loud in their out cries against the king, so they threatened his kingdom with an interdict, and had doubtless kept their word, if the affairs of that court had not been too much perplexed to permit them to venture upon an undertaking attended with so much danger. On the other hand, the king foreseeing what representations and what use the court of Rome would make of it, did not » Gervas. Chron. ann. 1 170. [X. Script.] col. 1414. N. 40. b Baron. Anna], ann. 1170. N. 45. 54 KING HENRY II. ; without good grounds dread the issue of this affair, and took all possible precaution to prevent the ill effects thereof, and to do right to his own honour and innocence, and more especially in the court of Rome : in order whereto he presently sent an em bassage thither. But that court, which never overlooked any ad vantage to serve itself, would not permit the embassadors to assert the king's innocence, until they had first made their way by good presents and round promises, that the king should abide by the award of the legates who should be sent to enquire into this affair ; a promise which in time entangled the king in diffi culties which he was never able to overcome. However, to put the evil day as far off as he could, the king sailed over to Ireland, to receive the homage of that kingdom. And as during his stay there that people generally submitted to his authority, so in a council which he held at Cashel, the bishops and clergy consented, and in the seventh canon ordained that divine service should be celebrated in all the churches of Ireland, according to the rites and customs of the church of England a. The settlement of Ireland took up the greatest part of this year; therefore the king fearing lest any ill use should be made of his long stay in that kingdom, ordered his ports to be stopped, and nobody to be suffered to come into England, that should pretend to bring letters of interdict against his kingdom. Thus things passed on till the year following (1172); but before that time the legates of the court of Rome arrived in Normandy, where the king permitted them to wait till his return from Ireland ; but being returned from thence, without making any considerable stay in England, he went over to Normandy, where he met the legates in the latter end of September. It was the cause ofthe court of Rome and interest ofthe papacy, for which the late archbishop had lost his life, and that court was resolved to be paid for the blood of their martyr : and what was said of the martyrs of the first ages, that their blood was the seed of the church, was verified in this their martyr. And it was a mighty harvest which they reaped from his blood ; for after all the noise and clamour they had made upon this subject, it appears plainly by the issue, that all their zeal and outcries upon this occasion were nothing else but arts to sell his blood the dearer. Therefore after some time spent upon this occasion, the king was forced upon an agreement, which at once gave away all that * Concil. Brit., vol. ii. p. 98. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 55 he had been so long contending for, and which in the consequence thereof overwhelmed the rights of the church and the crown, and let in an usurpation which bore down all before it. There were seven articles upon which this accommodation was founded, of which three or four so nearly concern the church that they are not to be passed by. First, that the king should never forsake pope Alexander or his catholic successors, so long as they used him as became a catholic king. Secondly, in causes ecclesiastical appeals should be freely made to the bishops of Rome, and the king should neither hinder them himself nor permit others to hinder them ; provided, that if any one should be suspected to have evil designs against the king or kingdom, they should give security before they departed out of his dominions. Thirdly, that the king should after Christmas next ensuing go to the Holy Land in person for three years, unless dispensed with by the pope or his successors ; and in the mean time, that he should maintain two hundred men for that service. Fourthly, that he should abolish all such customs as in his time had been introduced to the prejudice of the church. These articles, together with some others, by which he declares his innocence of the archbishop's death, and promises satisfaction, and to restore the rights of the church of Canterbury, being agreed upon, a council was called, where the king, the archbishop of Rouen, together with other Norman bishops and abbots, did in this assembly swear to observe the agreement; and so did his son king Henry, so far as the articles were general ; and then the articles were sealed with the seal of the king \ All that this mortified prince had in exchange, was absolution from the legates for the fault, of which he was first made to swear he was not guilty. Thus this unhappy prelate's death, like that of Samson, drew destruction after it, and the church and crown suffered more by it, than by all the attempts and endeavours of his life. And watered with his blood, the papal usurpation presently grew up to its full complement and perfection ; for having before gained from the crown the patronage of bishoprics by forcing the right of investitures from the kings of England, and broken all the autho rity of provincial and diocesan bishops by settling the legantine power, and by assuming an authority to exempt the religious from " Gervas. Chron. [ap. Twisden, Decern Scriptores, col. 1422.] 56 KING HENRY II. ; their jurisdiction ; they now by the article of appeals gained a power to call every thing to Rome ; and by the grant of the king to abolish the laws which they called prejudicial to the church, removed every difficulty which stood in the way of their new maxims and pretensions to the ecclesiastic liberty. There re mained little more, but to possess themselves of the crown ; and this too we shall hear of time enough, in the reign of king John, the son of the present king. The changes which presently ensued were so visible, that one of the writers of archbishop Becket's story, in the account written about this time, thus describes the change. " In the former reigns the authority of the see of Rome was little re garded11, and the kings of England ordered all affairs in the church as they saw good ; and under them the archbishops ordered all things according to the law of England ; and when the royal and archiepiscopal power united, their authority was uncontrollable and past resistance11." And the court of Rome appears to have had the same sentiments ofthe conquest which they gained over the crown and the English church, within the compass of the present reign, and by the address of the late archbishop : therefore when king John in the council of Northampton declared, that he challenged no other right in disposing the bishoprics, but what his prede cessors had enjoyed; Pandulphus the legate of pope Innocent answered, " that the right the king pretended to, was abolished by the surrender which archbishop Becket had made of his bishopric into the hands of the pope, and from that time the church of Rome was made the lady and mistress of all the churches of England0." But to return to the agreement of the king. Whatever the flatterers of the court of Rome may pretend to the contrary, we are to ground their first colourable pretence to appeals from England on the aforesaid article of king Henry. For though Henry of Huntingdon, who wrote in the preceding reign, saith, the use of appeals was begun by Henry bishop of Win chester, and then legate to the bishop of Rome d (as he adds) to serve some unworthy ends of his own, and Gervasius follows him in this opinion, (and they are in the right as to the fact ; for that prelate, endeavouring to lessen and modify Theobald then arch bishop of Canterbury, and bring every thing into his own hands, " Wharton, Anglia Sacra, par. ii. p 524. b Ibid. c Ibid. d H. Huntingd. lib. viii. p. 227. AND ARCHBISHOP BECKET. 57 led the way to that practice, and during the war between king- Stephen and the present king several things were carried to Rome;) yet as the practice was new, and had no ground in canon or antiquity or law, so that court, whose interest was served by it, was so sensible that their title was but precarious, and had the marks of novelty very fresh and visible, thought fit to give it the colour and appearance of right by their late agreement with king, Henry, and the article on this subject was at this time their best title to appeals from England. But what has been said before of the state of the English church under William the First and Second, explained by the ecclesias tical law of England in the statutes of Clarendon, puts it beyond a doubt, that no such right had ever been owned under the Nor man reigns. And the history of the ancient English church makes it no less evident, that the case had been the same in England from the foundations of the English church. And the whole circumstances and manner of gaining on the one side, and yielding on the other, make it plain, that religion was no way con sidered in that affair; for an article of this kind could never have had a being, if either side had believed that the court of Rome had a right to appeals from the authority of Christ or his church, or if this had been the ancient usage of England. So that if the circumstances and designs of king Henry had not explained the reasons thereof, one would stand astonished at a concession of this kind, and at this time of day, when the designs ofthe courtofRome were visible to all the world, and their abusesof that power to receive appeals, which they before this had gained in some other places, were become so notorious, that St. Bernard, who had done too much toward advancing the papal greatness, did but a few years before this complain of the abuse of appeals by the court of Rome, and in terms so passionate and full of re sentment as would make one very uneasy to read them. In his hundred and seventy-eighth epistle to pope Innocent, he tells that prelate, that it was the common complaint that justice was perished in the church, that the authority of the keys of the church was destroyed, and the power of bishops become vile and contemptible ; " because," saith he, " it is out of their power to punish offenders, or to correct the disorders of their own dioceses;" of which he assigns this reason: " offenders," saith he, "appeal to you and to the Roman court, and what the bishops determine with justice, you cancel and repeal, and what they forbid, you 58 KING HENRY IL, &c. determine and appoint a ; and if there be men either of the laity, clergy, or religious, who are more wicked and profligate than other men, they run to the court of Rome, and they have sanctuary and protection ; and having such defenders, they return and insult over those who pretend to correct them b." In the year 1174 a bull was received from pope Alexander declaring Becket a martyr and a saint, and appointing that the day of his passion should be received into the calendar c ; and all on a sudden the miracles of the new martyr shone so bright, that votaries to his shrine and devotions to his tomb became so fashionable, that king Henry was forced to run in with the crowd, and upon his return out of Normandy went and paid his devotions to the tomb of the late archbishop. And if the monkish writers, who began about this age to be fond of an invention of their own, the disciplining whip, do not misinform us, this prince submitted to it, and suffered his body to be scourged ; a sort of discipline, which till the latter end of the eleventh century4 had never been heard of in the Christian church ; and if men had not learned to consecrate their own follies, and to set up their own inventions as standards of holiness and devotion, might have continued unknown to this day. But this has so little of the gospel method of reclaiming sinners, that it is hard to say, whether this treatment was more disagreeable to the spirit of Christ, or more reproachful to the majesty of kings ; so that if we must not reject the authority and disbelieve this part of the story, the honour which is due to the character of God's vicegerents should at least oblige one to cover and forget it. — Had he stopped here, the age, and the difficulty of his present circumstances, might possibly have made some apology for him ; but so fatally did the aforesaid treaty break all the measures of this prince, that he never stopped till his concessions gave the finishing stroke to that interest, which broke his own, and plunged his posterity into mischiefs the past ages had never heard of. As for the court of Rome, it was no wonder if they made all possible haste to distinguish the martyr for the papacy, and let the world see what a value they put upon that bigotry, which had turned to such account to them. " Bernard. Epist. 178. b Ibid. c M. Par. ann. 1173. p. 127. d Du Pin, Eccles. Hist. Cent. ii. p. 126. INTRODUCTION. NATIONAL CHURCHES— PAPAL USURPATIONS ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CIVIL GOVERNMENT.1 In the year 1175, the king (Henry II.) received intelligence of the arrival of Hugo cardinal of St. Peter de Leon 2, legate of pope Alexander the Third. During his stay in England, the old dispute about the liberty of the clergy was brought under consideration ; and as this appears to have been the great errand, so the chief remains we have of this embassy is an agreement betwixt the king and the legate, which consists of these four following articles. First, that no clergyman for the time to come should be carried in person before any secular judge 3 for any crime or transgression, unless for abuses of the forest, or for such services as by reason of some fee they owed to the king or other secular lords. Secondly, the king covenants that he would not keep any archbishopric, bishopric, or abbey, in his hands above a year, unless there was an apparent necessity thereof. Thirdly, it was agreed that such persons as should confess or be convicted of having killed a clergyman, should be punished in the presence of the bishop. Fourthly, that a clergyman should not be obliged to defend himself by duel ". 1 Civil government.] From Inett's Origines Anglicans, &c. vol. ii. p. 295 — ¦ 313. 2 Hugo de Perleonibus, Cardinal Deacon of St. Angelo, and afterwards Priest Cardinal of St. Clemente. 3 Any secular judge.] See Index, under Clergy, exemption of from secular jurisdiction, p. 296. See also Christian Institutes, vol. iv. p. 32. 180. 235. Also Inett, vol. ii. p. 195. 319—22. » M. Par. ann. 1176. p. 132. 60 NATIONAL CHURCHES.— PAPAL USURPATIONS. If what has been already said has not enabled us to account for the reason of this transaction, one who considers the provision which the gospel has made for preserving the rights of the secular power, and the obedience which the first Christians paid to the worst of princes, or the grounds upon which Christianity was admitted as the religion of states and kingdoms, and the advantages which accrue to it from their favours and encouragement, would stand amazed at an attempt to discharge the clergy from the laws of the state ; and much more to find this claim founded on a pretended grant of Christ, who declared his kingdom was not of this world, and both lived and died a great example of the doctrine which he had delivered ; and which is stranger still, that devoting men to the service of religion should exempt them from the duties of it, and an authority to publish the gospel discharge them from the subjection which their holy function obliged them to preach to all the world. There is no doubt but our Saviour appointed an order of men to make the will of God known to the world, and to publish the terms on which He will pardon our sins, accept our services here, and reward us when this life is done, and gave them commission to convey this authority to others : and it is beyond all question, that this is a power different from that which God has given to princes, and such as they can neither give nor take away, nor assume to themselves. And they who are thus commissioned by Christ, are under the same obligation to preach the gospel as they are to obey God ; and the people are upon the same grounds bound to receive it. — And upon this foot Christianity was first preached and obeyed, though the secular power withheld their protection and persecuted those who embraced it : but God blessed His people, and gave success to the ministry of His servants, and will do so if ever this case should happen again. And if this is all that is meant by the independence of the church and clergy on the secular power, there is no more reason to doubt it, than to make a question whether the gospel ought to be preached, or God obeyed, or His people take a care of their own souls. But if the gospel gives no new powers to princes, it certainly takes nothing from them l : they lose nothing by be coming Christians : they are God's vicegerents as much as they 1 Nothing from them.] See Hooker, b. viii. c. iii. Keble's edition, vol. iii. p. 450—9. Again ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 61 were before, and in right of their character continue the common guardians of religion. And that of the prince is thus far the case of every subject too. His submission to Christ does not set him free from any relative duty : he no more ceases to be a subject than to be a father, a husband, or a master. Christianity makes no change in the natural ties of allegiance : the Christian Again c. vi. s. 13. thus : — " Christ in His church hath not appointed any such law concerning temporal power, as God did of old deliver unto the commonwealth of Israel; but leaving that to be at the world's free choice, his chiefest care was that the spiritual law of the gospel might be published far and wide. " They that received the law of Christ were for a long time scattered in sundry kingdoms, Christianity not exempting them from the laws that they had been subject unto, saving only in such cases as those laws did enjoin that which the religion of Christ forbade. Hereupon grew their manifold persecutions throughout all places where they lived : as oft as it thus came to pass, there was no possibility that the emperors and kings under whom they lived, should meddle any whit at all with making laws for the church. From Christ therefore having received power, who doubteth, that as they did, so they might bind themselves to such orders as seemed fittest for the maintenance of their religion, without the leave of high or low in the com monwealth ; for as much as in rehgion it was divided utterly from them, and they from it ? " But when the mightiest began to hke of the Christian faith, by their means whole free states and kingdoms became obedient unto Christ. Now, the question is, Whether kings by embracing Christianity do therein receive any such law, as taketh from the weightiest part of that sovereignty, which they had even when they were heathens ? Whether being infidels they might do more in causes of religion, than now they can by the law of God, being true believers ? For whereas in regal states the king or supreme head of the commonwealth had before Christianity a supreme stroke in making of laws for religion ; he must, by embracing Christian rehgion, utterly thereof deprive himself, and in such causes become subject to his subjects, having even within his own domi nions them whose commandment he must obey ; unless this power be placed in the hand of some foreign spiritual potentate ; so that either a foreign or domestical commander upon earth, he must needs admit more now than before he had ; and that in the chiefest things whereupon commonwealths do stand; but apparent it is unto all men, which are not strangers in the doctrine of Jesus Christ, that no state in the world, receiving Christianity, is by any law therein contained bound to resign the power which they lawfully held before ; but over what persons and in what causes soever the same hath been in force, it may so remain and continue still : that which as kings they might do in matter of religion, and did in matter oi false religion, being idolatrous or superstitious kings, the same they are now even in every respect as fully authorized to do in all affairs pertinent unto the state of true Christian reli gion." Vol. iii. part i. p. 517 — 9. 62 NATIONAL CHURCHES.— PAPAL USURPATIONS is as much bound to obey as the Pagan and the Jew. And the case is still the same whatever post he fills : the pastor is as much a subject to the higher power as the people committed to his charge ; and in some cases in those instances wherein they may pretend to act by the authority of Christ. For our Saviour, who as the great prophet and instructor of mankind laid the foundation of that society which He thought fit to honour and distinguish by the name of His body the church, and who appointed His ministers to go out into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature, and commanded the people to hear His law from their mouths and with meekness to receive the ingrafted word; to submit to those who watch for their souls ; and even to obey those who rule over them in the Lord ; does yet compare His church to a field that should consist of tares as well as good seed, and foretold that ravening wolves should come in sheep's clothing and deceive many. And His apostles by the same spirit foresaw that the seat of God would fall into the hands of antichrists, and deceivers arise who would set themselves above all that was called God ; or in other words, that the ministers of Christ would be subject to error, and might endeavour to impose their mistakes upon the world. Therefore at the same time they command us to believe and obey the gospel, they caution us not to believe every spirit, and not to receive any other doctrine but that of Christ, though it come attested by an angel of light ; to consider whether the doctrine be of God ; to try all things and hold fast that which is good. Thus far every Christian is for himself1 made a judge of the faith of Christ, and by the same authority too which commands him to receive it; and he is under the same obligation to reject the error, however it come recommended, as he is to provide for the welfare of his own soul. The case of the Christian magistrates is very different. They are obliged to encourage the worship of God upon rules of the gospel ; to see that subjects be duly taught ; to keep them from the danger of false teachers, and provide them such pastors as Christ has appointed. And if it happen through human frailty, corruption, mistake, or worldly interest, that the pastors of the church preach themselves instead of Christ, teach the people 1 For himself] See Hooker's Preface, chap. iii. § 1 — 3, and chap. vi. § 5, 6; or Christian Institutes, vol. iv. p. 380—2, and 415—7. ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 63 idolatry or superstition, or any doctrine which may endanger their salvation or the peace of his dominions ; the supreme power in such cases is under the same obligation to remove the deceivers and provide true pastors, as he is to protect the church, to secure the truth and honour of religion, the institutions of Christ, the welfare of his people, and the peace of his country. If the error spread farther and become general, and involve the governing part of a national church, this case may require more caution and prudence ; but if the matter be notorious and the offenders obstinate, the mischief cries so much louder for a remedy. For by permitting the guides thereof to involve them selves in the common guilt, and thereby depriving his church of the ordinary means of redress, God points out the duty of the magistrate, and calls the supreme power, to whom He has com mitted a general care of His glory, to exert the authority which He lodged in his hands. They are in this case under the same obligation to control the error, and secure the truth and honour of religion, as they are to obey God rather than men. And the reason is plain ; the guides in this case go beyond their com mission, and, as the apostle well distinguishes, it is the man and not the Lord that speaks by them. For it is certain that Christ never gave men authority to preach the idolatry which His gospel forbids ; and when this is the case, it is the wolf and not the shepherd which the magistrate drives away from the flock. Besides, this seems to be the only provision which God has made to secure the purity and succession of national churches. His promises to be with His church till the end of the world, and that the gates of hell should not prevail against it, are limited to the catholic church ; and though they afford us ground enough to believe that the church of Christ shall never fail, but continue visible till His second coming, yet these promises are not applicable to particular national churches. The present state of Africa makes it but too plain, that a national church may be extinguished : and if one looks to the condition of some western nations as they stand at this day, and to the general state thereof as they stood some ages since, it will be out of doubt that Christianity may be corrupted * ; that the guides and pastors 1 May be corrupted.] "As the churches of Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch have erred ; so also the church of Rome hath erred, not only in their living and manner of ceremonies, but also in matters of faith." Art. XIX. of the Church of England. 64 NATIONAL CHURCHES.— PAPAL USURPATIONS of national churches may avow the corruption, and propagate the idolatry which the gospel has forbidden ; may require the worship of an image, a relic, or a piece of bread ; deny the use of the sacraments which Christ instituted, or impose new ones of their own ; deny their people the use of the Scriptures in a language they understand, and command them to pray to God in one they do not ; an impostor may call himself the vicar of Christ, and under colour of His authority usurp the rights of princes and oppress their people ; and the spiritual guides of national churches may countenance and defend their claims and errors. Now whenever this happens to be the case, if the natural right which God has given to men to take care of their own souls, or the general commission which He has entrusted to supreme powers to provide for His honour, to minister wrath to evil doers and encourage truth and holiness, be not authorities enough to remove the blind guides and justify the redress, the mischief would be incurable ; a church might degenerate into a den of thieves, and souls perish and nations be ruined without the hopes of a remedy. They who bar the exercise of this power by advancing a pre tence of a spiritual relation betwixt the pastor and his flock, and raise up this relation above the reach of princes, and upon this ground pretend to tell us, that the secular power can neither nominate nor deprive a bishop, seem wholly to mistake this affair, and apply that to a particular local and legal, or at most a canonical relation, which is only applicable to the relation of a bishop or a priest to the whole Christian church. For the first is only human and prudential ; the latter flows from the Order, and has its foundation in the commission of Christ. For according to the way of speaking amongst the ancients there is but one episcopate, and every bishop is a bishop of the whole Christian church, and as such has a spiritual and pastoral relation to the whole flock of Christ ; and this is founded in the Order, goes along with the person, and without change or addition of cha racter equally entitles him to discharge the offices of his holy function throughout the whole Christian church ; and this relation continues as long as the character upon which it is founded. And all the forms of consecrating bishops, used by the Christian church, come up to the grounds of this opinion : they confer the Order, and the relation which flows from it. But the relation of a bishop or a priest to a people of a par ticular diocese or parish springs from a different fountain, and ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 65 must for that reason be of a different nature, and subject to different rules and measures. For it is certain, that a relation peculiar and appropriated to a person cannot flow from his cha racter ; for then it must lie common, and extend itself to the whole Order : and if it arise from a national establishment, it is then no other than a legal and local relation, and must of neces sity be subject to the same authority which gave it a beginning. And to one who considers how frequently this relation is dissolved by the voluntary acts of bishops, priests, or their people, in re moving from one diocese or one parish to another, and new rela tions acquired without assuming a new character, and all this, not only to serve the ends of edification, but sometimes for purposes of a very different nature ; it will seem somewhat strange to have it said, that a relation which so often gives way to covetousness and ambition, vapour, resentment, ease, or the little conveniences of human life, cannot be dissolved to serve the ends of peace or justice, or the safety of a nation, or the greater ends of truth and holiness. But if the distinct nature and grounds of the aforesaid different relations of the same men to the Christian church and to a particular people were duly weighed, all the difficulties which arise from this head would presently vanish. The reason and grounds of the present dispute about the authority of princes, have been considered in another place '. But it may not be amiss, before I end this digression occasioned thereby, to observe, that that which generally misleads learned men in their reasonings about the supremacy of princes and the dependence of the church upon the state, is the want of a due attention to the difference betwixt churches, considered in their proper natures and as they are incorporated into states and king doms ; and challenging those powers and privileges as the inherent rights of the church taken in the first sense, which are only applicable to churches in the second sense, and are derived from the concessions of the civil power. Churches considered as pure spiritual societies are founded upon the commission of Christ, and can have no head but Him on whose authority and doctrine they are built, and by whose spirit they are governed, and from whom they expect protection and rewards : and though that as such they have proper inherent rights, seems as evident as any part of our common Christianity, 1 In another place.] Preface to vol, ii. p. v. &c, or above, p. 7 ¦ vol. i. F 66 NATIONAL CHURCHES.— PAPAL USURPATIONS yet these rights are of the same kind with the institution itself, of a pure spiritual nature, and such as no way affect the rights of princes or the subjection of their people. And whilst churches continued in this posture, there was nothing to awake the jealousy of states and kingdoms. Princes who had not embraced the gospel did not concern themselves in the choice of pastors, or the voluntary rules which these societies prescribed to themselves, or in the exercise of a power which did no way affect the liberties, the estates, or the peace of their people. But when whole nations submitted to the doctrine of Christ, and princes and their people entered into Christian societies, and the gospel became the religion of states and kingdoms, and these societies were established by laws, and provision made by the state to support the ministers of Christ, bishops called to a part in the legislature and great councils, and qualified for those trusts by titles of honour, their censures enforced by civil sanctions, their authority enlarged by making them judges in many cases, wherein the reputation, the liberty, and property of the subject were con cerned ; by this change, bodies of Christians, which were before pure spiritual societies, were incorporated into bodies politic, and by becoming a part of the legal establishment acquired the title of National churches. And thus though their inherent rights remain, and may be enjoyed separate if princes should resume their grants, yet these societies acquired a new capacity, and became a part of the national establishment, and as such can have no other head but the head of the body politic ; for a national establishment not subject to the head of the national body, seems a fit subject for a jest, rather than a ground of controversy and dispute. But however wild and extravagant it may appear to after-ages, this was the present subject of dispute ; for the men who followed Hildebrand in the doctrine which he had lately broached of the independence of the church upon the state, took the doctrine in the lump, and without distinguishing what was true from what was false in that proposition, did, as he intended they should do, run away with the whole together. They applied that to national churches, which was only true of the whole Christian church ; and that to the particular and acquired rights of a national church, which was applicable only to the original rights of the church in general. They confounded the legal powers and privileges of the clergy with those that flow from their Order; and from the account which they were to give to Christ for their pastoral office, ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 67 argued against their allegiance as subjects ; and because they were accountable to the great Shepherd and Bishop of souls for the holy offices of their function, concluded they were not answer able to the magistrate for felony or murder; and from their authority to preach the gospel, argued themselves into a power to preach sedition and rebellion uncontrolled. Had the laity fallen into the same way of arguing, and, because they are answerable to God for theft, and perjury, and murder, and breach of the publie peace, concluded they were not liable to the punishments of the civil power, and, from their natural freedom as men, argued against their legal obedience as subjects, there had been an end of all government at once. And yet these claims are so equally balanced, that it is not an easy matter to determine which has the least reason on its side, or which of them is attended with the greater mischief and absurdity. But one who will carefully distinguish betwixt the relations of churchmen to the whole Christian church and to a particular people ; betwixt authoritative preaching of the gospel, adminis tering sacraments, conferring orders, — and choosing persons to receive those holy trusts, giving of livings, and bestowing baronies and palaces, and calling men to the great councils ; betwixt the plain and express doctrines of Christ, and the inferences and opinions supposed by some Christians to be grounded thereon, but contradicted and denied by others ; betwixt the rites and discipline of Christ's appointment and the prudential forms, rites, and rules of churches, to serve the ends of decency and order ; betwixt the proper power of bishops, flowing from their character, and their external jurisdiction in cases of tithes, patronage, de famation, validity of wills and contracts, and legitimacy of children; in short, betwixt the inherent and essential rights and powers of a church, considered as a pure spiritual society ; and the acquired powers, rights, and privileges of national churches, derived from the concessions of the civil powers, and not from the authority of Christ ; and will consider how reasonable it is. that the supreme power of nations should be judges of their own grants ; will not find it so difficult, as some men imagine, to reconcile the rights of the church to the ecclesiastical supremacy of princes. L^pon the whole matter : one who sees all parties of Christians addressing to Christian princes to decide the greatest controversies in religion, by receiving one church and persuasion of Christians into the national establishment, and shotting out all others ; f 2 6S NATIONAL CHURCHES.— PAPAL USURPATIONS soliciting for their favours, and calling for their laws to distinguish their opinions and constitutions ; to pimish offences against the natural and moral and positive doctrines and duties of rehgion ; imploring their aid to guard the inherent powers of the church, and making use of civil sanctions to chastise every contempt thereof; and whenever they prevail, all this bound upon princes bv the authoritv of their own laws and the religion of oaths ; and yet at the same time hears great numbers of the same persons telling the world, that princes have nothing to do in the affairs of the church and rehgion ; is tempted to such melancholy re flections on human nature, as are very apt to make a man fall out with himself, and even to entertain a very mean opimon of mankind. But whilst we are thus called to pity the weakness, and dread the mistakes and prejudices of men, one cannot overlook a subject for our thanks to God, who has placed us under the instructions of a church, whose wisdom and integritv teach us how to reconcile our faith and our allegiance, our zeal for our holv religion to a Christian pity for all that differ from us, and which at once calls us to assert the original and inherent rights of Christ's church, and at the same time to be just to the state which protects it, in acknowledging the supremacy of the crown. — But I have led the reader too far, and must return to the subject which occasioned this digression ; the fatal ao-reement of king Henry and the lea."ate of the bishop of Rome, for discharging the clergy and religious from the authority of the state. The tyrannical usage and horrible oppressions which the clergy afterwards met with under the papal usurpation, leave it out of doubt, that the court of Rome never designed more by their pre tended zeal in asserting the liberty of the clergy, than to cover their own designs the better, and to make use of the clergy, first, to assist in humbling their princes, and then to put the yoke about their own necks. However, for the present the secret was so artfully covered, that the clergy seem to have been very fond of the pretence : and this makes it easy to account for their conduct, but at the same time it leaves us still farther to seek out how it came to pass, that the kings of England, who could not but see the dangerous consequence of this design, should be brought into it. But if the views of the king hurried him on too fast to see the tendency of this affair, it is certain his council did not oversee the danger, and were just to him ; for in his letter to pope Alex- ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 69 ander upon the occasion of this grant, the king tells that prelate a, that "the wisest and greatest men of his kingdom very much opposed it :" and it was no wonder. For the ground on which this whole scheme was set on foot, was a new and very dangerous principle, viz., that the authority of kings did not extend itself to ecclesiastical causes or persons : so that by discharging the clergy from the obligation of the laws of England, the king did in effect acknowledge the supremacy over ecclesiastical persons and causes to be lodged in another hand. And we are not to wonder, if we find the clergy hence forward acting accordingly ; for that prince who gives up a body of his people to a foreign power, and by a formal releasing them from the obligation to his laws, at least virtually consents to their changing masters, does in a great measure remit the natural ties of allegiance, and must take a great share ofthe blame to himself, if such subjects forget the duties from which he first discharged them. The bigotry of Anselm, Becket, and some others, is past all excuse ; yet it ought to be remembered to the honour of the English bishops and clergy, that under the steady reign of William the first, the whole body of the clergy did unanimously oppose every attempt against the rights of the church and the crown ; and, Anselm and some few others excepted, they stood by Wil liam the second and Henry the first in the long controversy about investitures; and though king Henry the first had, by yielding up that right of his crown, in some measure given up the clergy to the mercy of the bishops of Rome, yet they were just to his grandson Henry the second, and did their parts towards the defence of the crown and the laws. So that do all one can, one, who considers well the series of our story, will find too much reason to believe, that the usurpations on the rights of the church and the crown were, if not entirely yet chiefly, owing to the ill- conduct of the present and the two preceding princes, who, to serve some present turns, or to stave off some impending dangers, made such concessions as in time broke their authority, and put it out of their power to preserve the rights of that church which God had raised them up to defend. Thus for instance ; William the first called in the authority ofthe bishops of Rome to depose the Saxon bishops and abbots whom he * Rad. de Diceto [ap. Twisden], Decern Scriptores, col. 591. N. 60. 70 NATIONAL CHURCHES.— PAPAL USURPATIONS did not dare to trust, that he might make way for the Normans: and his son Henry the first, to secure himself against the pretensions of his brother Robert, recalled Anselm, and thereby virtually and after wards in form yielded up the royal right of investitures : and king Stephen sent to Rome to have his title to the crown confirmed, and, to secure his possession, asked the legatine power for his brother, and unworthily bowed down before it, and acted the subject in his own kingdom. And appeals to Rome, though not established till the succeeding reign, had their beginning at the same time and upon the same grounds. To give the better colour to his ambition, Henry the second took a title to the kingdom of Ireland from pope Adrian ; and a dispensation from a successor to violate his father's will, which he had sworn to observe, and upon that ground dispossessed his brother Geoffrey of the dukedom of Anjou ; and by his afore said agreement, after the death of archbishop Becket, gave up the ancient right of the crown to the last resort in causes ecclesias- tical, and discharged the clergy from the secular power. By these false politics those princes did virtually own all that the bishops of Rome contended for, and it was in vain to pretend to deny the authority which they had allowed when it served their own ends. But if the hasty growth of the papal power in England be not thus to be accounted for, this part of our story must for ever be left in the dark ; for they who put it upon the superstition and ignorance of the age, or the bigotry of some particular men, have difficulties in their way which are never to be overcome. — But to return to the exemption of the clergy from the secular power. Wheresoever the blame ought to lie, it is but too evident this was the unhappy state of England ; ._ ^interests of the church and state were about this time divided, and set in opposition to one another ; the one headed by the bishops of Rome, the other by the kings of England : and we are in the ensuing story to see these two powers dashing one against another. And which is sadder still, the clergy, who of all men ought to be most tender of the peace and honour of their country, were by these unhappy changes put under a necessity of becoming parties in a very un natural and dishonourable usurpation on the rights of their natural princes and their kingdoms. — But whoever is to be blamed for letting in that usurpation, the clergy are never to be excused for what they afterwards did to render it lasting and insufferable. Whilst these things were doing (1177) in England, that we ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 71 might not be to seek where our miseries had their beginning, the same spirit appeared every where throughout the Western nations ; and though it advanced by slower paces than it had done in Eng land, yet a general assault was made upon the secular power, and there is scarce a nation in Europe which does not afford some trophies to adorn the triumphs of the Roman court. But those of pope Alexander over the emperor Frederic are very extraordi nary, and such as ought never to be forgotten. There had never been a good understanding betwixt the em perors and the bishops of Rome, from the time that pope Gregory the seventh first broached the doctrine of judging, correcting, and deposing secular princes. And as that doctrine and the new maxims of the court of Rome had given perpetual jealousies to those princes, the same reason had made them ever forward to break the measures of that party, which ran into the Hildebrandine principles. And this occasioned several schisms and wars ; and there had been a long quarrel upon this subject betwixt the present emperor and pope Alexander, which was compromised about this time, but in a manner so equally unbecoming both parties, that one cannot easily determine at whose door the greatest share of the infamy ought to be laid. After a war of sixteen or seventeen years, and a schism sup ported by a succession of four anti-popes a, and the blackest scenes of confusion and misery that war and schism can produce, pope Alexander, by the assistance and intrigues of the French king b, and by the arms of the Lombards and of William king of Sicily, had so entangled the affairs and so broken the measures of the emperor Frederic, that that prince saw himself under a necessity of making a peace with the pope : and meeting at Venice, an agreement was made, wherein it was stipulated that the emperor should beg the pope's pardon. Accordingly, at the great door of the church of St. Mark, in the presence of the senate and people of Venice, the emperor, kneeling down, kissed the feet of pope Alexander, and asked his pardon ; whilst that haughty prelate treading on the neck of the emperor, that he might at once offer an outrage to God and to his vicegerent, repeated these words, "It is written, thou shalt walk upon the basilisk and the asp, and tread the lion and dragon under thy feet c." " Stella de vitis Pontificum, p. 180. b Epist. Alex, apud Concil. torn. x. col. [1245] 1293. [1489. 1496, 7.] c Stella. Ibid. 72 NATIONAL CHURCHES.— PAPAL USURPATIONS The emperor endeavouring to lessen the infamy of so mean and tame a submission, cried out in return, that he submitted to St. Peter and not to him ; but that prelate replied, " Mihi et Petro8," giving himself the preference to the apostle whom he pretended to succeed. Baronius. who relates this story, and seems to have been ashamed of one part of it, does yet confess, that it has the authority of Blondus and ^Eneas Silvius, and that froni them it is translated into the chronicle of cardinal Bessarionb. And in the account which he gives thereof, he makes the story rather worse than better ; for he saith, that at that congress the emperor put off his imperial robes and dignity, and prostrated bis body to the ground to kiss the feet of the pope c ; and that when he came into the church, he took a stick, and, having first driven out the people, did the office of a door-keeper, and in that manner waited upon the pope to the altar d. But after all the pains he has taken to soften this story, Stella, a writer of the lives of the popes, and who was himself a Venetian, as he makes no doubt of the truth of that particular of which Baronius seems to be ashamed, so he speaks of it with a relish, and gives it a place amongst the triumphs of pope Alexander e. And that prelate himself was not only transported with the general success of this affair, but all his epistles written upon that occasion have an air and turn which plainly show he took pleasure in the pompous circumstances he must have blushed to have had a share in, had he not forgot the modesty and humility which became a Christian prelate. For in his epistles to the archbishop of Canterbury f, to the archbishop of York8, to the bishops of England11, and to the archbishop of Capua1, he takes care to tell them, that the emperor kissed his feet, and when he took horse held his stirrup. And there is no doubt but all the rest he wrote upon that subject ran in the same strain : and so hasty was he to publish his glory, that his letters bear date at Venice, where this affair was transacted. So that when we behold this scene, and at once see an emperor forgetting all the honour and majesty of a prince, and a Christian bishop insulting his rightful sovereign, and glorying in a pomp which crowned heads had never assumed ; we have in one view such unhappy instances of the effects of prosperity and adversity, as a Epist. Alex. b Baron. Annal. ann. 1177. ' Ejusd. N. 100. « Ibid. '¦ Stell. de vit. Pontif. p. 180. ' Concil. torn. x. col. 14S7. ' Ibid. h R. Dioet. [X. Script, col. 598.] 1 Concil. torn. x. col. 1486. ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 73 afford us a very mortifying reflection on the infirmities of human nature. If the French kings escaped better than the emperor and the king of England, yet it was not long before their great monarch Lewis was brought as a pilgrim to Canterbury, to pay his devo tions at the tomb of that prelate a, who had been the great instru ment in humbling the king of England, and had done a great deal in advancing the designs of the papacy. And that court was very just in making their returns, and letting the world see how much their heart was set upon humbling kings, by the veneration and favours which they paid to those who were their instruments therein. As upon this foot the French king was brought to the tomb of the late archbishop, and by rich presents and a grant of great quantities of wines yearly for the monks of Canterbury, he has given the world very unusual marks of a zeal for the rights of princes, so this year Philip earl of Flanders and the archbishop of Rheims b came to Canterbury on the same errand, to visit the tomb of the late archbishop. And the merits and sufferings of that prelate, or, to speak more properly, the cause he suffered in, not only shed a lustre upon his memory, but descended to all his creatures and followers : therefore about this time John of Salisbury, who had been a dependent upon him, was upon that account advanced to the bishopric of Chartres in France. And as the French king grounds his consent to the election of John of Salisbury, chiefly upon the friendship of that prelate with the late archbishop c, so he thinks fit to tell the world, that that election was owing to the influence of the archbishop of Sens, legate to pope Alexander d. And to render the honours to the memory of the late archbishop as public as was possible, the dean, precentor, and chancellor of Chartres, came over to England and made their election, or rather published the certificate thereof, in the cathedral church of Can terbury. As if all this zeal to brighten the memory of the greatest enemy the present king and crown of England ever had, and to reward his party, had not been mortification enough to the king, before this year was done a new legate from Rome, and at the Baron. Annal. ann. 1179. N. 21. Gervas. Chron. ann. 1177- [X. Script, col. 1435.] Ludov. Epist. ap. R. Dicet. [X. Script, col. 593.] * Ibid. 74 NATIONAL CHURCHES.— PAPAL USURPATIONS instance of Lewis king of France, who was then in open war with England, was sent into France with power to put the dominions of the king of England under an interdict, in case he did not suffer his son Richard to marry Alice the daughter of the French king a. And when by his menaces that legate had brought those two princes to an agreement, he farther engaged them to agree upon an expedition to the Holy Land ; an undertaking so fatal to all the Western princes who engaged in it, that one can hardly forbear applying to him who gave this advice, what our Saviour saith of sowing tares, " it was an enemy that did it." This was one article first put upon king Henry, when he made his peace upon the death of Becket : and indeed this was the usual atone ment required to appease their wrath, whenever the court of Rome was offended. And if weakening Christian princes and rendering them an easier prey to the papal usurpations were not at the bottom of this war, it is very certain this was the effect and con sequence thereof. Whilst the court of Rome was thus carrying on its designs to render the Western princes vassals to the papacy, and was every day making some new advances, they did not forget to mortify and humble their bishops ; and in order thereunto took all occasions to encourage those who attempted to break through the ancient discipline of the Church. And as the religious were ever the most forward therein, their encouragement bore proportion to the import ance of that interest which the court of Rome hoped to serve by it. It was this consideration which ever made them friends in that court, which no interest was sufficient to resist. And Richard archbishop of Canterbury about this time felt the effects ' of the bias that court lay under, and not only saw his authority disobeyed, and * Baron. Annal. ann. 1177. N. 126. 1 Felt the effects.] Of the progress, effects, &c. of this exemption of the religious orders from episcopal jurisdiction, we may take the following as a melancholy specimen from Sir Roger Twisden : " When the papacy first attempted the exempting some great monasteries from the jurisdiction of their ordinary, it was ' salva Primatis reverentia ;' or, as Malmsbury explains it, ' Archiepiscopi tantum nutum in legitimis spectaturus.' But, however this was thus carefully penned not to thwart with the archbishop, yet, being brought hither, it was taken away by Lanfranc, and not permitted to be made use of, the abbot finding no other way to regain it but ' multorum preces.' Yet afterward the pope without scruple exempted them not only from their diocesan, but even such as were under the arch bishop's nose, with all pertaining to them, were taken out of his jurisdiction ; ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CIVIL GOVERNMENT. 75 the offender supported in his rebellion, but put in a condition to set him at defiance, and to insult him in his own province ; and this was occasioned by the vanity and ambition of the monks of Canterbury. The convent of the monks of St. Austin having first driven out, and then by their interest in the court of Rome got their former prior deprived about two years before, they chose Roger in his room, who having in a very haughty manner required the arch bishop to come to Canterbury, and to give him his benediction in his own monastery, was told by the archbishop that it was his duty to attend the place which he appointed. Nevertheless he at last consented to come to Canterbury, and give him his benedic tion, provided the prior would make such profession of obedience as had usually been made to his predecessors : but this was a con descension the monks had not humility enough to think of, much less to bear ; and therefore their prior was sent away to Rome, and in the beginning of this year returned to England with the ring and the mitre, the usual ensigns of the episcopal authority a, and with a mandatory letter from pope Alexander, requiring the arch bishop of Canterbury to go to the monastery of St. Austin in Canterbury, and there to give his benediction to the prior elect, and without requiring from him the usual profession of canonical obedience b. When the archbishop refused to obey, the prior returned to Rome, and there received his benediction. Nor was this the only mortification put upon that prelate ; for pope Alexander did at least pretend to confirm the scheme and model projected by and he who at first preserved others' rights, had now those houses at an easy rate removed from his own : a fact of infinite advantage to the papacy, by which it had persons of learning in all parts, who, depending wholly on it, defended what was done as being so by one who had a power (right) of doing it. And he (the archbishop), who alone did at first * agere vices apostolicas in Anglia,' was under no legate, permitted no bull from Rome to be made use of in England but by his approbation, was now so far from taking them away from the bearers, that private clerks, by deputation from thence, did sit as his superiors in determining differences between him and others, who by strength were taken from his jurisdiction." Vindication of the Church of England, §c. p. 39, 40. On the general question, see a learned and elaborate statement in Inett, vol. ii. p. 204—23. See also 226,7. 318,9. 338—41. and 494. See also Index, under Religious Orders, exemption of, k)c. " Gervas. Chron. ann. 1178. [X. Script, col. 1444.] b Ibid. 7 76 NATIONAL CHURCHES, &c. Gregory the Great, and to determine that the two archbishops of Canterbury and York should have precedence according to priority of consecration a, and that the archbishops of Canterbury should not require a profession of canonical obedience from the arch bishops of York b ; and in case they refused to consecrate the archbishops of York for want of such profession, the bishops of the province were then to consecrate them by the papal authority0. But though a constitution of this kind appears both in the history of Diceto d and in the appendix to the third council of Lateran, and this doubtless served to perpetuate the quarrel upon this sub ject, yet it doth not appear that it answered the ends for which it was designed : however, it could not but give some uneasiness to the archbishop of Canterbury. But if pope Alexander gave too much to the province of York, he endeavoured to make the archbishop of Canterbury a recom pense at the charge of his suffragan bishops. Those prelates, it seems, had a wrong notion of the legatine authority, and per suaded themselves that the archbishops of Canterbury as legates had no cognizance of such causes as were the proper subject of their authority, but when carried to the legate by appeals e : but by a constitution of pope Alexander the third, directed to the bishops of the province of Canterbury f, he thinks fit to tell them, that though their archbishop as metropolitan had no cognizance of things arising in their dioceses, but when brought to him by appeals, yet as legate he had cognizance of every thing in the first instance as well as in case of appeals g, and commanded them quietly to submit, and to suffer causes from their several dioceses to be brought to his legate ; or, in other words, quietly to part with their rights and to yield up their authority, as a sacrifice to the usurpation which was by this time grown masterly and in capable of resistance. This was the return which the court of Rome made to those bishops who were not so careful as they should have been in the defence of their metropolitans ; they were made an easy prey, and became a common sacrifice to the usurpation which they wanted precaution or courage to prevent ; and if they had any favour, it was only this, to see the rights of the crown and the national church perish first, and to be themselves last devoured. ¦ Concil. torn. x. col. 1690. '' Ibid. c Ibid. d R. Dicet. [X. Script, col. 589.] " Concil. torn. x. col. 1690. • Ibid. n Ibid. INTRODUCTION. KING JOHN, THE BARONS, AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD1. The design of pope Gregory the seventh to change the primitive and apostolic government of the Christian church from an aristo cracy to a monarchy, and such a monarchy too as pretended to a supreme authority over princes, falling into the hands of a suc cession of men who for more than an age pursued it with indefati gable zeal, great applications, and steady counsels, the ecclesiastic monarchy was raised to such a pitch, that pope Innocent, taking the advantage of a dispute (1207) betwixt Otho and Philip, who by different factions were both elected emperors, determined " that the correction of princes belonged to the bishops of Rome a ;" that " it was their right to judge of the elections of emperors, and either to approve or reject as they saw cause6 :" and this deter mination was inserted into the decretals, as a standing law and maxim of the court of Rome. And in the council of Avignon in the year one thousand two hundred and nine, it was decreed by the legates of that court, that bishops might by the censures of the church compel the lords, nobility, and people, and governors of provinces, to promise upon oath to extirpate heresy out of their country, and in case of neglect to interdict their dominions and countries °. 1 The third.] From Inett's Origines Anglicanee, &c. vol. ii. p. 410 — 22, 430—52, 465—72, 473—87. 11 Blondel. decad. ii. lib. vi. b Decretal. Greg. lib. i. tit. vi. cap. xxxiv. c Concil. torn. xi. par. i. col. 43. 78 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, The conduct of that court was suitable to the maxims thereof; for not contented to command the wealth, and usurp on the authority of the Western churches by drawing the clergy and religious to a dependence upon them, and thereby to secure to themselves a considerable interest in the several dominions of the Western princes, they carried their pretensions still higher, and under the umbrage of the Holy War ' found out ways to break in upon the authority of states and kingdoms, to lay impositions on their subjects, and without the leave of their princes to raise men and head armies in their dominions, and in some measure to make themselves masters of their wealth, their arms, and people. And it was an easy step from hence to advance to the command of their crowns ; for he who has the wealth and subjects in his power, has the prince and the crown at his disposal. And so art fully did they manage that war, that those expeditions which were at the first the scourge of infidels, became at last the terror of Europe, and were upon all occasions held as rods over the heads of Christian princes. The emperors of Germany had very often felt the dire effects of that holy fury, and the Eastern church and empire were at this time bleeding under it. And yet, as if God had given up the Western princes to blindness and infatuation, and intended to redouble His judgments upon them by suffering them to be parties to their own ruin, whilst these things were doing, they were so fatally charmed by the artifices of the court of Rome, that their arms were engaged one against another, and princes by turns were tools to and suffered under the imposture, and were not allowed to see their danger, till it was past a remedy. For whilst they slept, the new ecclesiastic monarchy grew up to the most formidable power in Europe ; and which is still more, it was in the hands of pope Innocent the third, a young, bold, and active prelate ; a man of great capacity, great application and address, and greater ambition ; and as exactly fitted to put the last hand to the vast designs of the court of Rome, as if God had raised him up for an original of craft and ambition, and intended in him to let the world see, what base and unworthy designs might be covered and carried on under the colour of religion and the holy name and authority of Christ. 1 The Holy War.] See Index, under Crusade. See also Ben. Accolti De Bello a Christianis contra Barbaros. 1731. 8vo. Buddsei Selecla Juris Naturalis, p. 97 — 148, &c. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 79 Whilst the court of Rome was thus in the height of its glory, the monarchy of England was in a very feeble and languishing con dition. The king found his kingdom deprived of the civil duties and assistance of the clergy and religious, their persons made sub jects to a foreign power, their wealth excused from the necessities of the state, and the power of nominating and investing bishops snatched out of his hands ; and by this means saw so great a body of men excused from his laws and government, that the number, wealth, and dependencies of the clergy and religious considered, it may seem doubtful whether himself or the bishop of Rome had the greater interest in his kingdom. Besides, the king had ascended the throne over the head of his nephew, Arthur earl of Bretagne, and if he had not the guilt of his death to answer for, yet the world believed hardly of him, and he had at least the reproach and the dishonour of it. The suspicion he had of his title made him very liberal in his promises, and stoop too low to meet the crown ; and that raised an expectance in his people which he could not answer, and for that reason he was scarce sooner on the throne, than on ill terms with his subjects : and he was so far from recovering the affections of his people by his succeeding conduct, that he gave them too much reason to believe, that the care of their welfare had not its due weight upon him ; so that time rather increased than put an end to the uneasi ness and disaffection of his people. And the issue was such as might be expected ; for they remembered the promises which the king had too soon forgot, and suffered themselves to be led by his ill example to forget their own duty, when he stood most in need of it, and when the honour of the monarchy and their country required it at their hands. In this posture stood the affairs of the monarchy and of king John, when he was called to assert the rights of his crown, against a bold and daring encroachment of pope Innocent the third, in his attempt to force an archbishop 1 upon him. The king had the law, and the ancient usage of England, and the rights of all the princes of Christendom on his side ; but the time was now come when the court of Rome was to let the world see, that the canons were rules fitted only to the infant ages of the Church, and had now no more force, but where the interest of the papacy made them binding: and accordingly the power which Christ had trusted 1 Force an archbishop.] See Southey's Book of tke Church, vol. i. p. 256 — 62. SO KING JOHN. THE BARONS. to His church, to serve the ends of peace and holiness, was pre sently called forth to serve the purposes of that ambition, which our Lord detested and which His rehgion had forbid. For pope Innocent seeing the king resolute to maintain the poor remainders of his right, proceeded to interdict the kingdom, and commanded that the sentence which he had before pronounced in his own consistory at Rome, shoidd be pronounced and pub lished in England by the bishops of London, Ely, and Worcester, who for this purpose were made executors of the aforesaid sen tence : and the interdict was pronounced accordingly, the latter end of March this year (120S), and too soon and too generally obeyed. The king, as he had great reason to be, was exceedingly provoked with this wicked and unchristian usage, and suffered his resent ment to carry him to such extremities as turned to his disad vantage : for not content to treat WiUiam bishop of London, Eustace bishop of Ely. and Malgar bishop of Worcester, as their undutifulness deserved, and to force them to seek their safety out of his dominions, that prince, though he did afterwards distinguish and receive those to his favour and protection who refused to observe the interdict, for the present let loose his rage upon the whole body of the clergy and religious, and generally seized their effects, especially those of the religious. And the event was such as usually succeeds, when princes suffer themselves to consult with their passions, and make their own displeasure the measure of their justice ; for seeing innocence no longer their security, and the innocent and guilty involved in the same fate, resentment carried the clergy and religious beyond their duty, and united them, at least in their wishes, to the papal interest. It seems very probable, that this proceeding had a very different effect from what the king expected, and, instead of giving a check to it, made the interdict the more generally observed: so that except the baptism of infants, confession, and the last offices to dying persons, there was a stop put to all the public offices of reli gion. The dead had the burial * of the ox and the ass ; daily prayers, the administration of the eucharist, preaching of God's word, were forced to give way ; God's altars were forsaken, His houses shut up and left destitute ; in short, the honour of God and the interest and care of soids were made sacrifices to the 1 Had the burial.] See Index, under Interdict. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 81 tyranny and ambition and wickedness of the court of Rome ; and (except in some convents, which had ever been the favourites of that court, and were for that reason, rather than for the sake of God, permitted to say their offices once a week a) this was for some time the miserable state of the nation, at least wheresoever the interdict was obeyed. The king, who had by his own ill conduct provoked the clergy and religious, saw himself under a necessity of endeavouring to bind his lay subjects faster to his interest ; therefore he called them to renew their oath of fealty, and took hostages from many of his nobility. But though he was generally obeyed herein, yet such precautions as give men reason to think they are suspected without cause, do commonly operate the wrong way, and, if they tie up their hands, do at the same time alienate and let loose their affections, and carry their hearts another way ; and if this was not the case of this prince, the too general coldness of the nobility in the defence of the king gave ground for a suspicion of this kind. And the heavy impositions which the present circumstances of the king required, redoubled bis misfortune ; for it is so natural to subjects to judge by what they feel, that nothing but uncommon measures of goodness and wisdom can secure their affections to a government, that does not suffer them to be safe and easy under it. This still increased the difficulties which the king lay under ; for though Geoffrey archbishop of York only openly opposed the imposition of a thirteenth part of all their moveables, which was upon this occasion laid upon the nation, and excommunicated the king's oflicers that attempted to collect it in his province, and chose rather to leave England than submit to it, yet it appears that this imposition caused a general murmur and uneasiness. Misfortunes of this kind seldom go alone ; for the enemies of a prince can never want advantages, if he once deprive himself of the affections of his people ; for as the hearts of subjects, next under God, are the only certain supports of a crown, every enemy becomes formidable to the prince that wants them. And the court of Rome had but too many opportunities to be informed of the terms on which the king stood with his people ; therefore pope Innocent made another step, and excommunicated the kmg * Anonymi Hist. Croyl. [W. Fulman, Rerum Anglicarum Scriptt. Yett. vol. i. p. 473.] vol. I. G 82 KING JOHN. THE BARONS, by name, and required that this sentence should be pronounced against him every Sunday and every holy-day in all the conventual churches in England a- This excommunication had not all the effect the court of Romeb expected; for though some of the bishops and abbots fled out of England, to avoid the difficulties which the personal excommunication of the king might have drawn upon them, it being impossible to reconcile their duty to their prince and to their country, to the expectation of that court which required that they should withdraw themselves entirely from the presence and service of the king ; yet, for the most part, the duty or the fears of the clergy and people kept them from paying any regard to a sentence founded in injustice, and attended with danger : so that if the ill-advised conduct of the king had not suffered him to involve the innocent, amongst the clergy and religious, as well as the guilty in his displeasure, the unchristian attempts of pope Innocent against the king might possibly have come to nothing. However, things being brought to this pass, the honour and interest of the court of Rome were so far engaged, that pope Innocent omitted nothing that might take off the affections of his own people, or stir up the neighbouring princes against the king, or give him such apprehensions of the power and address of the court of Rome, as might probably work upon his fears. His first attempt was upon the subjects ; and in his epistle to the bishops of England and Wales, he blames their coldness and want of zeal for the ecclesiastic liberty, and exhorts them to set them selves as a wall of defence to the house of God, and endeavours to possess them with a belief, that this was the cause of Christ and of His church c, and commands them, " that laying aside all fears of the king, they should assert the ecclesiastic liberty d." In his address to the nobility of England, he left nothing unsaid that might engage them against their prince ; tells them they cannot serve two masters, and that the king was fighting against God ; and conjures them as they tender the good of their souls, that they oppose the designs of the king, and not suffer him to embroil them and his kingdom. And lest they should think that this zeal was the effect of some sudden heat and might cool again, that prelate tells them how much his heart was set Matth. Paris, ann. 1209. p. 228. b Ibid. Innoc. Epist. lib. x. epist. 159. d Ibid. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 83 upon this affair ; " that he was resolved never to give it up, and, if occasion was, would lay down his life in the defence of it :" and profanely alluding to what the prophet saith of God, that prelate thinks fit to add, that his hand was not shortened, but by the grace of God so strengthened, that he should be able to crush and oppress him that justly incurred his displeasure a. And the better to spread the ferment through the whole nation by depriving the people of all public offices of religion, in another epistle to the bishops of London, Ely, and Worcester, he com manded them to involve Wales as well as England in the sentence of interdict, and not to suffer the hospitalers, or templars, or any other of the religious, to pretend to an exemption from it b- Whilst this wicked prelate was thus sowing the seeds of sedition in England, and preparing the way to that dismal scene which too soon ensued, the court of Rome made so many suc cessful efforts abroad, that if the king made his judgment of his success and future treatment by the usage which about this time the neighbouring princes received from the ecclesiastic monarchy, he had at the best but a very melancholy prospect. For whilst this dispute was carrying on in England, the court of Rome scattered its thunders all over Europe, and by turns mortified almost all the princes and states of Christendom. It was the intrigues of that court which first raised Otho to the empire of Germany, in opposition to the pretensions of Philip ; and because he could not be contented to be a tool, and would not sacrifice the rights of the empire to the ambition of the papacy, that prince was excommunicated and deposed by pope Innocent. Vladislaus prince of Poland was deposed, and Otho his son excluded from tho succession by the same prelate". Raymond earl of Tholouse was not only excommunicated and forced to a base and unworthy submission, but treated worse than a schoolboy ; first scourged with rods d, and then dragged to the tomb of the friar Peter de Chasteau-neuf, who had been killed by his people for attempting to set up the inquisition in the country ; and after this usage, to bind the yoke still faster upon him, he was forced to surrender seven or eight of his strongest towns to the legates of pope Innocent, as a security for his future servitude, and to promise upon oath to obey all and every the commands of " Innoo. Epist. lib. x. epist. 160. b Ejusd. epist. 161. 1 Uzovii Annal. ann. 1207. d Mezeray's Life of Philip II. ann. 1208. G 2 84 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, the church ; that is, in other words, to be a vassal to the court of Rome. And Avignon, at that time a part of the dominions of that prince a, being one of the cautionary towns, was yielded up on this occasion to the legates of pope Innocent, and remains to this day as a standing monument of the barbarous treatment, which this oppressed and unfortunate prince owed to the ambition and wickedness of the court of Rome. Which is sadder still, the earl was compelled to take the cross, and to join himself to those who took his towns and butchered his people ; and all the fault of this prince was, he would not destroy his subjects nor his neighbours, because pope Innocent thought fit to pronounce them heretics, and had inhumanity enough to decree their extirpation. The subjects of that prince upon the same grounds had still a greater share in the fury of that prelate ; for pope Innocent finding St. Dominic and his followers make no great progress in the conversion of the Albigenses, he taught his successors a new and quicker way of converting heretics ; for sending his emissaries to preach up the crusade, an army computed at five hundred thousand men b was raised, and under the command of Simon earl of Montfort marched into Languedoc, then the country of the earl of Tholouse, where they took Beziers, one of the strongest cities of the Albigenses, by force, and put all to the sword ; and above threescore thousand persons were sacrificed to their furyu, according to the account which Mezeray gives of this affair : indeed Bzovius lessens this slaughter to seventeen thousand heretics d. And that posterity might not be deceived and think all this the effects of a warlike fury, pope Innocent took home the guilt of all this innocent blood to himself and to the court in which he presided ; for this was done in pursuance of his instructions to his legates, to whom he had given it in charge, "that the Albigenses should be pursued with fire and sword e, and treated with more severity than the Saracens themselves f." And to colour this horrible inhumanity under the pretence of religion, pardon of sins and the hopes of heaven were promised as the rewards thereof : so much more dangerous was it now become • Bzovii Annal. ann. 1208. N. 4. b Ejusd. ann. 1209. and Mezeray, ann. 1209. c Ibid. d Bzovii Annal. ann. 1209. N. 10. e Ejusd. ann. 1207. N. 5. ' Ibid. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 85 to oppose the designs of the court of Rome, than to blaspheme Christ and His holy religion. And so far was this barbarous war carried on, that Simon earl of Montfort, general of the army, made himself master of the Albigenses, and of the country of Beziers and Carcassone ; and the countries he had conquered were given to him by pope Innocent a, as a reward for the blood and inhumanity of which he had been guilty. But that the world might not be at a loss to know from whence that detestable design had its beginning, who formed it and whose ends it was to serve, the earl was to hold the country he had thus over-run, " as a fee of the papacy, under the acknowledgment of a yearly tribute b." About the same time that this vast army, entirely at the devotion of the court of Rome, was in the bowels of France, and king Philip by this formidable power prepared to receive the instructions of that court, pope Innocent excommunicated that prince for repudiating his wife. He humbled the king of Portugal for an affront offered to a bishop of his kingdom c ; and upon the same foot he treated in like manner Frederic king of Sicily d, and forced him to swear fealty to himself and his successors in the see of Rome e. He forced a prince upon Poland, and with an air that might become a monarch of the world, commanded Henry emperor of Constantinople to revoke a law which he had made, as was pretended, prejudicial to the rights of the church f : and so much like a pupil did he treat that prince, that although he was the creature of pope Innocent, and it was in his power to unmake him again, yet he could not bear the insolence of that prelate, but sent his remonstrance to Rome, and told pope Innocent that St. Peter delivered it as a part of the religion of Christ, that all Christians ought to be subject to the ordinance of man for the Lord's sake ; that the authority which Christ deli vered to His church was only spiritual : and to bring this nearer to pope Innocent, in that rescript he tells him, that " he was the subject, and not the lord of the emperor ; therefore he wondered at his presumption in treating him as he had done s." The king of Arragon too had a great share in the displeasure of that prelate, who let loose his holy warriors upon him ; and that prince was 8 Mezeray, ann. 1209. N. 6. b Bzovii Annal. ann. 1210. c Ejusd. ann. 1206. " Ibid. c Ejusd. ann. 1211. N. 1. ' Ejusd. ann. 1210. N. 4. b M. Goldast. Constit. Imp. torn. iii. p. 371. 86 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, forced to yield up a part of his dominions to reward the army of the papacy, which had ravaged one part of his country, and put himself and all the rest in danger. That which is still more surprising, is, that whilst the court of Rome thus treated the princes of Christendom like slaves, or at the best like children and pupils, and dashed in pieces and broke the secular powers one against another, and gave such proofs, that that court thought of nothing less than to captivate and enslave all the rest ; such was the infatuation, such the blindness, to which God was pleased to give up the Western princes, that their wealth and their people were turned against them, and they were themselves made parties to their own dishonour, and helped forward the designs against the secular power, which the tamest and most bigoted princes in Christendom would resist with their blood, if the court of Rome should ever attempt to act them over again. But having said this, partly to give the reader a view of the unchristian and bloody spirit which at this time animated the court of Rome, and to lay open the methods by which they enlarged their dominions and increased their power, and partly to cover the reproach and dishonour of the English nation and monarchy, by showing that our princes were not singular and alone in their fate, and only bore their part in the common vas salage of Europe, it will be time to return and pursue our story. The aforesaid transactions abroad, and what they felt at home, could not but give king John and the whole English nation a formidable idea of the papal power ; and this served to forward the arts which were every where set on foot, to raise an opinion, that it was in vain to resist it. And lest the posture and turn of affairs abroad should lose their effect upon the king, in several epistles written upon that occasion, pope Innocent took care to magnify the successes of the papacy, and to let the king know what ill success those princes had met with, who attempted to oppose it : and there was but too much ground for an insinuation of this kind. The conduct of the king was such as would lead one to think, he was willing to have it believed, that if not his honour, yet at least his indignation and resentment had raised him above impressions of this kind, and left no room for his fears ; yet do all he could, the course of his actions gave such proof of the uneasiness and frightful apprehensions which he had of this affair, as will not permit one to doubt thereof. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 87 But if the king took care of his own defence, pope Innocent did every thing that was thought needful to ruin and to undo him : in order whereto his emissaries used all endeavours to blacken the king and lessen his forces, and to magnify the interest and strength and conduct of the court of Rome. The king was represented as an apostate from religion ; as one who had offered to renounce his faith to preserve his sovereignty ; as an enemy to religion, to the liberties of the church, and to the rights of his people : and a wicked impostor, named Peter the Hermit, was set up to prophesy, that before Ascension next coming he should cease to be king, and none of his posterity ever come to the crown. In short there was nothing of this kind wanting, which might either encourage the enemies of the king, or discourage and with draw his friends : and the wicked reports raised upon this occasion made such impressions and took such root, that our historians who wrote his story, have generally spoken of him as the vilest and most despicable miscreant in the world. But because it was not easy to libel and rail a prince out of his kingdom, who had a fleet and an army at his command, pope Innocent apphed himself to that known method, which had now for near an age served all the purposes of the court of Rome, under the colour of destroying infidels and promoting the interest of Christ and His rehgion ; and this was the Holy War ; for with this art that court had frighted Philip king of France, and forced the king of Arragon to give up the rights of his crown ; they had massacred the subjects of the earl of Tholouse, given away the possession of his country to the general of the army, and taken the sovereignty thereof to themselves, and subdued the Eastern empire to the Latins. And now (1212) the time was come when the Enghsh nation was to have its turn, and to feel the dire effects of that fury which had before consumed its blood and treasure ; for, seeing no other way to accomplish his wicked purposes, the pope sent his emis saries into France and Germany, to preach up the cross, and to persuade Europe to believe that it was a service to God and to rehgion, to enslave the king and kingdom of England. — But well knowing that considerations of this kind began to lose their force in France, by a bull directed to king Philip, pope Innocent en treated and conjured that prince, as he tendered the hopes of sal vation, to take up arms and to drive the king of England from his throne ; and besides the promises of heaven, he did by the same 88 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, bull grant to him, and his heirs, the kingdom of England as a reward for his services a. The French king, who wanted no ill-will to the king of Eng land, and had lately dispossessed him of his dominions in France, was very inclinable to secure his late conquests at home, by carry ing his arms into England. But the relation and strict alliance betwixt the emperor Otho and the king of England, and the league betwixt that prince and the king of Arragon, were a check upon him, and gave him reason to dread leaving his own dominions, whilst he had such neighbours to leave behind him. Nor were these ill-grounded jealousies ; for the emperor Otho had a good army, and, as iEmilius saith, maintained at the charge of the king of England b ; and which is more, that prince had declared that so soon as he had quieted his affairs in Germany, he would assist his uncle the king of England in the recovery of his dominions in France c To remove these difficulties, pope Innocent, who had before forced Otho to promise obedience to him, did about this time depose him d, and set up Frederic king of Sicily in his stead ; and if the French historian be not mistaken, this was done at the instance of the French king e ; and by thus finding the emperor work enough at home, he delivered the French king from the fears of that prince. By giving new vigour to the holy warriors on the borders and in part of that kingdom, pope Innocent frustrated the expectations of the king of England from that of Arragon, and left France no thing to fear from thence : and if his designs upon England were not the views upon which pope Innocent acted in those instances, the perpetual jars there had been between that prelate and the French king, and the unhappy event of that expedition, incline one to think that these great favours to France owe their begin ning to a resolution the pope had taken to enslave the king of England, and to render his dominions a fee of the papacy, not withstanding the fair promise which he had made to king Philip. However that matter be, the French king, being thus delivered from the fears of an invasion in his absence, appointed the meeting a Matth. Paris, ann. 1212. b Paulus jEmil. de gestis Franc, vit. Philip. Aug. foi. 130. Lutet. ann. 1551. c Ibid. « Ibid. « Ibid. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 8.9 of his great council, which assembled at Soissons a, and being en lightened by pope Innocent and the emissaries whom he had sent to preach the cross, Ferdinand earl of Flanders only excepted, that assembly concluded it was an act of piety to sail with their forces into England, to restore the exiled bishops b Nor was the resentment of pope Innocent bounded here, but he sent his letters and emissaries all over Europe c, and all the great men were invited to attend the French king in the Holy War against the king of England : and the same methods that had given such success to their former undertakings of this kind were again set on foot. " The pardon of sins, the indulgences and protection of the holy see, and the privileges usually granted to those who engaged in the expeditions to the Holy Land, were the promised recompence d :" and this unchristian and wicked undertaking was called revenging the wrong done to the universal church e ; and that they might be distinguished who engaged in this enterprise, they all wore the cross upon their breast, as they had done in the inhuman undertaking against the Albigenses. The French king having fallen in with the example of pope Inno cent, and covered his ambition and revenge under the umbrage of religion, a numerous fleet and a powerful army were provided for the execution of this great design f. King John, who had for some years not only withstood but despised the censures of the court of Rome, and who had reason to expect the last efforts of its rage, was not a stranger to the pre parations made against him : and as he could not but see that all this sprang from the designs of a court which never knew what mercy meant but when they gained by it ; and that the execution was put into the hands of one who had given him abundant proof of the ill-will which he bore to him, he applied himself to the most likely methods to provide for his own security ; and besides those whom he had in his pay, and five hundred men brought him from Ireland by John Gray bishop of Norwich, his lieutenant in that kingdom, he summoned all that held of him in knight's service, and drew together an army (as M. Paris saith) of threescore thousand men ; and that he might not only stand the shock of the enemy, but keep him at a distance, he caused all the ships that could " Paulus iEmil. de gestis Franc, vit. Philip. Aug. foi. 130. Lutet. ann. 1551. b Ibid. c Matth. Paris, ann. 1212. d Ibid. 18 Ibid. ' Mezeray, Life of Philip, ann. 1212. 90 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, be met with to be drawn together, and manned out a fleet to dis pute the passage of the French at sea. Preparations being thus made on all sides, and every thing ready to decide this quarrel by the sword, Pandulphus the pope's legate, who was charged with a dark and secret errand, much against the will of the French, came over into England about the beginning of May, where he found the king at the head of his army near Dover waiting the coming of the French ; and having made known his character, he delivered a letter to the king from pope Innocent, in which that prelate tells him, that " blessing and cursing were set before him," and that "it was. yet in his power to choose," but that "if he did not submit to the terms he prescribed and had sent inclosed, he would deliver the church of England, as God did that of Israel out of Egypt, by a strong hand a :" and the better to give the impressions intended, he further minded the king, how he had humbled all the princes who had presumed to oppose him. In short, the whole letter carries an air of haughtiness and arro gance that might have become a pagan emperor, but it has not the least mark or taste of the Christian spirit. The aforesaid letter and the message of the crafty nuncio hav ing somewhat shocked the steadiness and resolution of the king, and awakened his fears, the legate applied himself to set such im pressions upon him, as might best serve the purposes of the court which sent him : in order whereto he magnified the strength and the appointment of king Philip's army, and so artfully represented the assurances, which, as he pretended, that prince had received from the nobility of England, that they would come in to his assistance so soon as he landed, that he brought king John to believe, that his danger was no less from his own army than from that of king Philip, and that he had no other way to be safe than by throwing himself into the arms of the church. As the insinuation of the dangers which might arise from the defection of his own army was one of the chief artifices on which the court of Rome founded their hopes, all possible care had been taken to cultivate and improve the king's jealousy and distrust of his people : and, besides an intimation of this kind, which Pan- dulph had let fall in his former conference with the king at Northampton, things were so ordered, that the king received letters from several hands to the same effect. And the truth is, * Innoc. Epist. lib. xv. epist. 233. p. 726. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 91 the king had suffered himself to be so far transported by the suc cesses of his arms against the Welsh and Irish, and by the natural levity and haughtiness of his temper, as to forget that the affec tions of his people were his best security ; and some harsh and arbitrary treatments of them had given too much ground for the suspicions, which now proved fatal to him. That* unfortunate prince having brought himself into this strait, sunk under it, and promised upon oath (1213) to submit to an award of pope Innocent or his legate : and the award was such as might be expected from a court which for more than an age had been struggling to subdue princes, and to set up a monarchy that was to raise and humble them at pleasure, and to govern the nations upon earth, under the colour of His authority whose kingdom was not of this world. — The issue was accordingly; for the reason which had given beginning to and supported the controversy, which was the pretended vassalage of the English church, was the last thing considered, and the interest of the new monarchy the first. For in the agreement, the articles whereof were doubtless brought from Rome, the first article does, in all the accounts we have, run in this manner, viz. " That the king should surrender and yield up the kingdoms of England and Ireland, and for the time to come hold both as fees of the papacy ; the former under the yearly tribute of seven hundred marks, the latter under the tribute of three hundred." This one article leaves it beyond all possibility of doubt that the court of Rome intended nothing less than to usurp the sovereign power of the kings of England, and to swallow up that authority at once which they had been struggling for a great while, under the specious name of eccle siastic liberty : for to show that this article was not inserted only to add pomp and ceremony to the submission of the king, or that the power was imaginary, at which the designs of that court were levelled, the article was explained by the execution thereof ; for in pursuance of this agreement the king surrendered his crown and his sceptre and other ensigns of the royal dignity to Pandulphus, and in the presence of his bishops and nobility did homage for his own kingdoms to the legate, who received it in the name of pope Innocent and of the church of Rome. And to make sure work, he also yielded up the patronage of all the churches in England which belonged to the crown, and by an oath, in such form as was usual from vassals and feudatory princes to their supreme lord, they bound his chains about his head : for in that oath the king 92 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, swore to be " faithful to God, to St. Peter, and the holy Roman church, and to his lord pope Innocent, and his catholic successors ;" that " he would neither in deed, word, consent, or counsel, do any thing to the prejudice of his life or limbs, but do what in him lay to discover and prevent all harms and wrongs ;" that " he would keep the secret which the popes by themselves or by their legates or letters should entrust to him ;" that " he would defend the patrimony of St. Peter, especially the kingdoms of England and Ireland, against all opposers whatsoever." This is the substance of the oath imposed on this unfortunate prince, as it is delivered down by M. Paris a, the Annals of Waverleyb, and the Chronicle of Hemingford c, and which differs so very little from that imposed by pope Gregory on some of the Western bishops4, and comes so near the form called the new oath of fidelity \ prescribed by the feudal law e to be imposed by abso lute lords on their vassals and feudatories, as plainly shows that pope Gregory and his successors acted upon the same views, and intended nothing less than the vassalage of the Western nations. I shall add no more on this head, but the reflection which natu rally occurs, and which Hemingford immediately subjoins to the aforesaid oath : " Thus," saith he, " of a freeman did the king become a slave." To consummate the misfortunes of this prince, as if they had intended that neither his conscience nor his honour should survive his calamity, they obliged him by two distinct charters, one directed to pope Innocent, the other to all Christian people, to tell the world, that " all this was done, not by constraint, or fear, but by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, and of his own free will, and with the common consent of his barons f." But though the ambition and designs ofthe court of Rome were ever the first thing in the view of pope Innocent, and the compass of a year or two made it appear how little regard was had to the church, or to the clergy of England, or to their rights and privileges, * Matth. Paris, ann. 1213. p. 237. '¦ Gale, Histories Anglicanse Scriptores quinque, vol. ii. p. 177. c Ejusd. p. 555. d Baron. Annal. ann. 1079. N. 8. 1 Oath of fidelity.] See Barrow On the Pope's Supremacy, or Christian Institutes, vol. iv. p. 126 — 9, and notes there. e Feudor. lib. ii. tit. vii. 1 Chart. Joh. Reg. Angl. Epist. Innoc. lib. xv. epp. lxxvii. and Ixxviii. p. 786, 787. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 93 which had served of late to make a noise and to cover the true secret of that court ; yet for the present the clergy were compre hended in this agreement, by which the king further stipulated to reverse the outlawry against the nobility, bishops, clergy and reli gious, to receive them into favour, and to make satisfaction for the losses the clergy and religious had sustained during the interdict. In particular the archbishop of Canterbury, the bishops of London, Ely, Hereford, Bath and Wells, and Lincoln, who seem least to have deserved it, were distinguished by greater measures of favour in this fatal agreement. For, besides having their names inserted in the general agree ment, they had letters patent directed to each of them from the king, in which he not only assures them, in his own name, that he would receive them to his favour, and entreats them to return to England, but in the body of their patents he tells them, that H. archbishop of Dublin, Peter bishop of Winchester, John bishop of Norwich, and twelve barons, had by oath engaged them selves to see this agreement performed. — But whilst pope Inno cent was thus careful of the interest of the court of Rome, and of their immediate creatures and dependants, the French king was to be rewarded with the merit of the undertaking ; and the holy warriors whom this occasion had drawn together, instead of the towns, honours and wealth which they expected, were to be paid with indulgences and rewards from heaven. — Thus was this affair concluded in England about the fifteenth of May in the year 1213, and the fourteenth of the reign of king John. Matters being thus concerted in England, Pandulphus returned to carry the news to France, where he had a new and (it may be) a much greater "difficulty to manage. To quiet the exiled clergy, he carried with him eight thousand pounds as a part of what they were to receive for the damage they had sustained, which, with the hopes of a far greater sum and an assurance of an honourable reception in their own country, did for the present make them easy under the late agreement. — But to manage the spirit of the French king required greater address; for that prince, whose views were of a different kind, and who could not bear the thoughts of being paid with a future glory, was out of all patience to see himself tricked in the face of the world, and his mighty hopes end in nothing else but the reproach of being a stale and a tool to the papacy. He could not but with great mortification reflect on his own ill conduct, who, as he told the legate, had spent above three- 94 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, score thousand pounds in this affair, and all this to make an acces sion of two kingdoms r to the ecclesiastic monarchy, which under the conduct of pope Innocent was at this time the most formidable power in Europe. Besides, the iU example whieh he had given might too soon return upon him, and what he had done at the instance of pope Innocent against the Albigenses, the king of England, and the emperor Otho the fourth, might, when the time came, serve to justify the like attempts against himself and his own crown. For as the pretence of the court of Rome to depose kings and give away crowns, was indefinite, and without any limitation but the pleasure of that court whose creature that pretence was ; there is no doubt but that court had an equal title to the deposing of a French king, and might as well give away France as Germany and England, or the country ofthe Albigenses. Nor was the French king the only person that was mortified and disappointed by this fatal league ; for if the clergy, who did not yet penetrate the true secret of the court of Rome, or at least did not sufficiently consider the effects thereof, were for the present easy under it, their future conduct, and the ill treatment which the exiled clergy and religious so soon received from that court, put it out of doubt, so that they were very quickly and not without ground very- uneasy under it, and could not but with great mortification behold the conjunction of those powers, which might in time render them an easy prey to either. — The truth is, God's time was now come to punish the wild bigotry of the English nation, which under the cover of zeal had been instrumental in letting in an enemy upon their country : for though this unfortunate prince was singled out, and in his fate the world was to see the imposture of the court of Rome in its full and true dimensions, yet to do right to the king- it must be owned, that he fell a sacrifice to the imprudent and ill conduct of his subjects and ancestors, and to the superstition and ignorance of the past and present age, rather than to his own per sonal failings and miscarriages ; for though his conduct is scarce capable of excuse, it is certain, he could not have been used as he was, if his hands had not been tied up and his authority fettered by the unwary concessions of his predecessors, in giving away so many of the ancient and essential rights of the crown of England. — And the punishment was answerable; not personal only, but a national and a public mischief. 1 Two kingdoms.] England and Ireland. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 95 But whilst all the other parties concerned in this affair were so equally mortified in the event thereof, that it is hard to say which of them was most uneasy under it, the joy and transports of pope Innocent and the court of Rome bore proportion to the import ance of the interest which they served by it, and rose up to a pitch incapable of concealment from the public view; for the sub jugating of two great and opulent kingdoms, and rendering them fiefs of the papacy, was such a step towards the monarchy they had been labouring for, that the whole air of pope Innocent and the turn of his epistles and rescripts make it very plain, that he now thought of nothing less than being another Melchisedech, and at once the great high-priest and the monarch of the world. The style of that prelate was answerable to the idea which he had of his power ; for in the bull by which he granted the king doms of England and Ireland to king John, he thus describes the present state of the papacy, and the duty and acknowledgment which that court expected : " Jesus Christ (saith he) the king of kings and lord of lords, and priest according to the order of Melchisedech, hath so united the royal and sacerdotal power in his church, that the kingdom is but a royal priesthood, and the priesthood the royal power":" and the consequence he makes was fitted to the notion which gave beginning to it; for he infers from hence, that " as every knee in heaven bowed down to Christ, so every one should yield obedience to his vicar here upon earth b." And indeed this was the doctrine which the court of Rome did about this time scatter all over Europe ; and with such zeal and sincerity did pope Innocent act up to this doctrine, that the Annals of Waverley tell us, that in his time " God subdued the three pestilent enemies of the church, the schismatics of the east, the heretics of the west, and the Saracens of the south." And in the fore-mentioned epistle to king John, pope Innocent saith, it has "pleased God so to order the affairs ofthe world, that those provinces which had been anciently subject to the Roman church in spirituals, were now become subject to it in temporals0." And that Germany as well as England might feel the effects of the new grandeur of the papacy, about this time or not long after, Frederic * Rex regum et Dominus dominantium Jesus Christus, Sacerdos in eeter- num secundum ordinem Melchisedec, ita regnum et sacerdotium in ecclesia stabilivit, ut sacerdotale sit regnum et sacerdotium sit regale. Innoc. Epist. lib. xvi. epist. cxxxi. p. 810. b Innoc. Epist. lib. xvi. epist. cxxxi. p. 810. c Ibid. 96 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, the second, advanced to the imperial crown by pope Innocent, was prevailed upon by that court, by an imperial constitution, to revoke all laws prejudicial to the liberties of the church, and to exempt the clergy from the authority of the civil courts a. And lest charity and the late more modest pretensions of the bishops of Rome should lead posterity into a belief that the temporal monarchy of the bishops of Rome was not at the bottom of the aforesaid affair, but that the submission of king John was the effect of an unhappy turn of things, or owing to the rashness or despair of a sunk and dispirited prince ; pope Innocent has set this matter in a true light, and in two epistles, the one to Stephen archbishop of Canterbury and the bishops and clergy of England15, the other to the archbishop alone c, has told the world that the agreement, of which the resigning his kingdoms and receiving them as a fee of the papacy and the oath of vassalage were a part, " was projected and with great deliberation formed at Rome." — But having said this to offer to the reader's view the spring by which pope Innocent moved in the long controversy with king John, it will be needful to return, and to observe the consequence of this surprising story. The French king having now no more use for his fleet or army, the better to cover the disgrace which he had received, and take his revenge on the earl of Flanders, who had opposed his intended expedition to England, sent his fleet with some forces by sea, whilst the rest marched by land to invade Flanders. And this gave the king of England an opportunity to satiate his revenge on that prince ; for the fleet of the king finding the French fleet in the harbour of Dam, the forces being landed cut their cables, and carried off all that were on float, and burnt those which lay upon the strand ; in all about three hundred. By that one blow the king delivered himself from the fears of the invasion he had been threatened with; and as his spirit was naturally light, and exalted with every success, this made him move so heavily in the execution of his late agreement, that it was the middle of July (1213) before the exiled bishops and clergy returned to England. Not long after, they attended the king at Winchester, where the arch bishop, somewhat more forward than pope Innocent intended"1, absolved the king from the personal excommunication he lay under, leaving the interdict in the state it was before. * Constit. Fred. [Corp. Jur. Civil, vol. ii. col. 561.] b Innoc. Epist. lxxx. p 787. c Ibid. d Ibid. Epist. clxiv. p. 827. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 97 Whilst this assembly continued at Winchester, the king ap pointed his bailiffs and officers to make a general inquiry into the losses sustained by the clergy and religious during the late con troversy, and appointed the bishops, the religious, and nobility to consider that affair; in order whereto they met first at St. Alban's in August, and afterwards at St. Paul's in London. And as the accounts of the losses sustained were brought into these assem blies, so these meetings discovered the general dislike and uneasi ness which the late conduct of the king had given to the nation. And the nobility and bishops here concerted measures for their future conduct ; in order whereto, the great charter of Henry the first was brought into debate, and resolutions taken to have that charter and the laws of Edward the Confessor confirmed, and made the great standard of right and law. However privately these matters were concerted, it was not long before the king was made sensible of the general discontent and uneasiness of his people ; for that prince having obtained the aforesaid advantage over the French, pleased himself with the thoughts of recovering what they had gained from him in Nor mandy, and carrying home his revenge ; and in order thereto had determined on an expedition to Poictiers in France ; but the barons who had been summoned for that end, under the pretence that the interdict was not released, generally refused to attend the king ; and when he would have punished their disobedience accord ing to law, the archbishop of Canterbury, who knew the true secret of this affair, interposed with so much vigour as deterred the officers of the king. This was so open a contempt of his authority as plainly showed the king that he was still a great way from the settlement and peace which he promised himself from his late agreement. And though the king was thus ill-used by his barons, yet it is so natural for men to be jealous of their liberties in the hands of a prince, who had made himself a vassal, and so reasonable to fear that he would not be just to their rights, who had betrayed and given away his own, that as the conduct of the barons is blame- able, the provocation is not capable of an excuse. Revolutions and great turns of states and kingdoms, as they commonly proceed from fierce and impetuous passions, very often partake of the nature of those passions from whence they proceed, and move with a force and rapidity that sometimes carry them farther than ever was designed by those who first projected VOL. i. h 98 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, them ; and sometimes by an unhappy crossness in the nature of things or men, or by the overruling hand of Providence, take a turn quite the wrong way, and bear down the interest which they were intended to support and gratify. This was in some measure the fate of the late revolution : it changed men, and shifted sides and characters ; and as it brought the king and his adherents into the interests of the court they had before opposed, so on the other hand it took off the affections, and cooled the zeal, and changed the measures of those whose bigotry had before carried them too far to serve the papacy. And yet, after all, the king, the barons, and the clergy were all uneasy, and as well they who laboured to lessen the royal dignity, as they who strove to maintain it, with an equal dread beheld the consequences of the late agreement. — But as pope Innocent, who had yet no time to be informed that the affairs of England had taken a turn too much, continued under the transports his late success had given him, so he thought of nothing less than putting the last hand to the work which he had thus successfully begun. He easily foresaw that the late resignation of king John would be resolved into force or fear, and if a voluntary, yet at most it would be esteemed but a personal act J ; and he understood government too well to believe it any way in the power of a prince to change the course of law to enslave his people ; for tius was to assume an authority which the very nature of the royal trust and the great ends of government had precluded; and to pretend to create a right which the same law, by which the claimant held, had put out of his power. Therefore that prelate applied his thoughts to gain the consent of the nation, and in order thereto, under the pretence of giving the king time to satisfy those who had suffered under the interdict, and releasing it with the greater solemnity, he continued the interdict for more than a year after his agreement with king John. But to make a show of his readiness to release it, and lay the delay somewhere else, pope Innocent sent over Nicholas bishop of Tusculum with the character of legate, who arrived in England the latter end of September (1213); and the great council being called, met at St. Paul's in London in the beginning of October, and a new charter of resignation being drawn, was sealed by the king in the presence of the bishops and nobility ; and to consecrate so impudent an imposture, the charter thus executed was offered 1 A personal act.] See above, p. 22. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 99 upon the altar ; and this execrable sacrifice to the ambition of the church of Rome was called an offering to God, and ascribed to the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Stephen archbishop of Canterbury, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Win chester, Eustace bishop of Ely, and Hugh bishop of Lincoln, together with several of the nobility, subscribed as witnesses to this second charter. The resignation being thus renewed, and the charter delivered to the legate, the king received his kingdoms back again from the hands of the legate ; and in order thereto did the second time, and in the presence of this great assembly, do his homage, and swear fealty to the church of Rome and to pope Innocent and to his lawful successors : for thus the charter and thus the oath of fealty ran, and not to the court of Rome as some men endeavour to distinguish. Whilst all this care was taken of the interest of the papacy, the interdict was still continued till June the year following. Though the bishops and nobility were present at this solemnity, and some of them witnesses to the instruments which it produced, yet they were so far from being pleased with or consenting to them, that the archbishop of Canterbury, to do somewhat towards expiating the wrongs which he had before done to the monarchy, is said to have offered a protestation against the aforesaid charter of resignation": and the turn of affairs which not long after ensued, would incline one to believe, that if any such protestation was made, it was agreeable to the sense of the whole English nation. However, the legate still flattered himself with the hopes of bringing the nation to consent to their own servitude, and, as has been said, continued the interdict on foot to the great prejudice of the king's affairs. But pope Innocent and his court found themselves extremely mistaken in the whole conduct of this matter ; for the true spirit and design of that court being laid open to the world by this attempt on the crown of England, it could be no longer a doubt but that it was the same spirit which animated pagan and christian Rome, and that subduing the world was the design of both. This forced open the eyes of those who before would not see, and gave such a shock to the designs of the papacy, as must neces sarily have dashed and broken them to pieces, if, for reasons best known to Himself, God had not thought fit to prevent it. — But " M. Par. ann. 1231. p. 371. n. 10. h 2 100 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, the issue and consequence of this affair were such, as leave it evident, that the proceedings of that court in this particular shocked the whole English nation, and on a sudden gave a new turn to the unhappy controversy which first occasioned it. For the same men who for six or seven years before had ventured their lives, at least their fortunes, to serve the interest of that court, did immediately after the resignation of the king shift sides, and fly in the face of the court which they had served before ; and a general discontent covered the face of the nation. And the issue was answerable ; for the king having of a free and independent prince thus made himself a vassal, his ill example taught his subjects to forget their duty, and a general defection ensued. Indeed it is so natural for men to form their judgments and govern their actions by what they see and feel, that it is next to impossible for princes to preserve their honour or their authority, when once they abandon the trust and duties which should support them ; for duties which flow from the relations of men to each other do ever subsist, as relatives do, by being mutual. The laws of England had provided for their kings as free and sovereign princes, and set out and stated the obedience which was due to them in that capacity ; but the term of a vassal or feudatory prince was something with which the law and consti tution of England were not acquainted : and no provision could be made for the honour and authority of such a prince, as our constitution had no knowledge of: so that by giving away the title of a free and sovereign prince, and by taking to himself that of a vassal to the papacy, the king had done all that lay in him towards removing the very foundations upon which the allegiance of his subjects was built, and, by giving away his own rights, led his people to believe he was unfit to be trusted with theirs: and the issue was, this untoward scene produced another no less unhappy, the war betwixt the king and his barons. But though the seeds of war were thus sown, yet before it broke out there were several other causes which met together, and which prepared the way for it, by uniting the discontents of the nation, and bringing the clergy to side with the barons against the king and the papacy. For the court of Rome having, as has been said, determined to make their title to the crown of Eng land as firm as it was possible to make it, and in order thereto to have a second resignation in the presence and (if possible) with AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 101 the consent of the great council, great care was taken to keep the king steady. For that end pope Innocent gave directions to his new legate to gratify the king, in filling up all the vacant bishoprics and abbeys a ; and the interest of the court of Rome lying now another way, after England and France had been set into flames, and all Europe deafened with the outcries of that court for tbe free elections of bishops and abbots, pope Innocent gave it as an instruction to his legate, that he should " take parti cular care of the interest of the king, in filling up all the vacant preferments b ; and that if chapters should make any opposition to the persons the king desired, he should compel them to obedience by the censures of the church °." Being thus backed by the interest of that court, the king carried all before him, and filled up all the vacant churches and monasteries with men firm to his interest ; and the legate pursued his instructions, and treated with haughtiness and insolence all the clergy that stood in the way. The clergy, too many whereof had for some time been tools to the Roman court, and had helped to enslave their country to serve the interest thereof, could not persuade themselves on a sudden, that this usage was founded on the instructions of pope Innocent, but rather owing to some sinister ends of the legate ; and were very angry at this proceeding, and complained and ap pealed to the court of Rome. But, alas ! it was all in vain ; for shifting sides had on a sudden made such a change of men, that at Rome king John and archbishop Langton had shifted cha racters; and Pandulphus, who but a few months before had treated king John with great insolence and contempt, and made it his business to represent him as an enemy to God and to his church, and upon that ground had laboured to engage his sub jects in a rebellion against him, being now sent to Rome to oppose the appeals of the clergy against the proceedings of the king and the new legate in the matter of the aforesaid elections, he represented king John as a prince of extraordinary modesty and humility, and blackened the archbishop, of whose great piety and goodness and wisdom pope Innocent had for some years past made so much boast and noise all over Europe : — accordingly, these two great men shifted places in the esteem and favours of pope Innocent and his court. And though the men, their principles, and their rights, were • M. Par. ann. 1213. p. 247. n. 30. b Innoc. Epist. lib. xvi. epist. 138. p. 813. c Ibid. 102 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, in the same state they had been in when the ecclesiastic liberty was so dear to that court, yet the merits of the English clergy vanished on a sudden ; and Pandulphus, who had so often ha rangued them with the glory of their sufferings, and fed them with the hopes of a reward, did now represent them to the court of Rome as covetous and greedy, and unreasonable in their de mands of satisfaction, and set them out as oppressors of the king and the just rights and liberties of the crown. — Thus sped the archbishop and the bishops. Lest his former favours should turn back upon him, and the bulls and epistles which he had given out for the encouragement of the clergy under the interdict, should reproach his present conduct, pope Innocent took all possible care to extinguish the memory thereof ; and in order thereto commanded his legate the bishop of Tusculum to require that all letters and decrees from him, relating to the king, should be brought to him, and that he should forthwith cause them to be torn to pieces or to be burnt a ; by which means the clergy and religious were not only disappointed of the reward which they promised to themselves from their late sufferings, but in some measure they were deprived of the com forts, at least of the best proofs which they had of the merit of that cause in which they suffered ; and these were those letters and rescripts which pope Innocent commanded to be burnt. Thus did the all-wise providence of God return their bigotry upon their own heads. They had been fond of a foreign power, charmed with the sound of ecclesiastic liberty, compared their late condition to the Egyptian bondage, and the change to their deliverance from slavery ; and the issue was, they who distin guished themselves by greater measures of zeal for the papal usurpation, had the first and the greatest share in the tyranny thereof. And instead of that liberty which they fondly pro mised to themselves, this unhappy affair, by putting it out of the power of the crown to defend them, gave the finishing stroke to the usurpation which the court of Rome had so long been contending for ; and the clergy of England, instead of liberty, entered upon a state of servitude which never ended till they finally threw off the yoke which they had fondly put about their own necks, and were by the Reformation restored again to their ancient state. Whilst a ferment was thus raised, and a general discontent overspread the nation, the king (probably confiding in his new * Innoc. Epist. lib. xvi. epist. 133. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 103 friendship with the court of Rome) instead of applying proper remedies, by indulging his unwarrantable pleasures, by giving countenance to some arbitrary ministers, and by laying heavy impositions on his people to prosecute his war against the French, rather increased and inflamed the discontents of the nation, than did any thing towards a cure. And though his affairs at home were in this ill posture, he this year with an army went over into France, and attacked the country of Poictou, whilst his nephew Otho the emperor and the earl of Flanders attacked Philip king of France on the side of Flanders. In the mean time his ab sence gave opportunity to his discontented subjects to concert measures for that unhappy war which too soon ensued in England. However, that he might not seem altogether careless, and un concerned for the affections of his people, the king obtained an order from pope Innocent to his legate to release the interdict ; and an assembly being convened to St Paul's in London for that purpose, the interdict was with great pomp and solemnity released the twenty-ninth of June this year (1214), after it had lasted six years three months and fourteen days. This release gave great satisfaction to the common people, who are usually charmed with the pompous outside and appearances of religion : and some of the clergy and religious had upon another account great reason to be pleased with the issue of this assembly ; especially the archbishop of Canterbury, and the bishops of Ely, Hereford, Bath, and Lincoln, and the monks of Canterbury ; for upon ad justing the account betwixt them and the king at this meeting, it appeared that they had received seven-and-twenty thousand marks from the king, and had security given them for thirteen thousand more, for the losses which they had sustained under the interdict. This example, together with the repeated assurances which they had formerly received from the legates, had raised a general expectation in the religious and lower ranks of secular clergy, that their losses should be considered : therefore, as M. Paris observes, an innumerable company of abbots, priors, templars, hospitalers, abbesses, monks, secular clergy, and laity, did at the time of releasing the interdict apply themselves to the legate, and demanded satisfaction for the losses which they had sus tained during the continuance of it ; but they were dismissed by the legate with this mortifying answer, that " he had no instruc tions concerning them," and that " it was not fit for him to act beyond his commission." However, that he might not drive 104 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, them into despair, he advised them to apply themselves to the pope : but it being now above a year since the agreement betwixt king John and Pandulphus, this answer appeared to be nothing else but artifice, and the art lay so open, that the clergy and reli gious easily saw what they were to expect, and returned home in great discontent, and, for aught appears to the contrary, without a thought of applying to pope Innocent for a remedy. The nation continued in a mighty ferment, and the discontents every day spread farther and grew bolder. The clergy and reli gious universally ran into the party which opposed the king and the court of Rome. A general discontent having thus prepared the way, the earls and barons of England, under the colour of a pilgrimage, met together about the middle of October at St. Edmundsbury in Suffolk, where they bound themselves by an oath to demand of the king the grant of the laws and liberties which king Edward had formerly granted to the church and king dom of England, and, in case of refusal, agreed to compel him to it by force of arms. And preparations being made accordingly, at Christmas following (1214), they appeared armed and very numerous at the court held at the New Temple in London, where they made their demand in such a manner as gave the king reason enough to be assured they were resolved not to be denied. This demand was grounded upon a promise made by the king at Winchester in the year 1213, when the archbishop gave him absolution from the excommunication he had lain under for some time: for, taking that opportunity, the archbishop required a promise of the king, which was confirmed by his oath, that he would love, defend, and maintain the church and the clergy against all their adversaries; that he would restore the good laws of his ancestors, especially those of king Edward ; and, in general, that he would govern justly. But the king, having an swered that it was a matter of the first moment and required time, did by the mediation and security given by the archbishop of Canterbury, the bishop of Ely and William Mareschall, gain time till Easter following, to give his final answer to the demand of the barons. But as this delay seems to have been designed' by the king only to gain time, so it served also, by this appearance of duty and moderation, to give a colour and reputation to the pretences ofthe confederates. But Easter (1215) being come, the barons met at Stamford in Lincolnshire, and from thence proceeded in a AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 105 warlike manner towards Oxford, where the king then was ; but coming as far as Brackley, they were met by the archbishop and some other commissioners from the king, appointed to receive their demands ; which being carried to the king, he answered with great indignation, " Why did not the barons demand his kingdom?" and the second time denied their petition. Things being come to this pass, both sides prepared for war ; and the better to amuse the world and cover their pretensions, both parties took pattern from the court of Rome, and took sanctuary in a pretence of zeal for religion and the church. The king, who was much influenced, by the counsels of the legates, fell directly into the steps the court of Rome had frequently tried with good success ; and whilst he saw himself in no condition to defend his crown and country, as if he had been perfectly at leisure, and had had nothing to do at home, did with great so lemnity take upon him the cross, and put himself under vows of going to Palestine : and, in truth, though he was much more likely to be driven out of his own country than to do any thing towards the recovery of the Holy Land, and in all probability had not so much as one thought of that kind, but, on the con trary, his hypocrisy and dissimulation lay open to every view ; yet it is very likely that he was as sincere, and had as much religion at the bottom of this pretence as that court ever had, from whence he took the artifice. And as under this cover that prince pretended that his person and crown were under the imme diate protection of the holy chair, so upon the same ground he reproached the other side under the title of apostates to religion a, and, according to the new doctrine of the court of Rome, pre tended " they had forfeited their lands," and invited " foreigners to his service with the promises of the forfeited estates b." That the address might be equal on both sides, the barons set up the like pretensions to religion, and chose Robert Fitz- Walter as their general, under the title of the mareschal of the army of God, and of his holy church c. Thus did these unhappy nations behold a war begun upon such grounds, and conducted with such circumstances as the world had never seen before. The king took part with his own vassalage, and drew his sword to continue himself a slave ; and he who for some years before had with a becoming bravery and courage maintained the rights of his crown, ¦ M. Par. ann. 1215. p. 255. n. 20. b Ibid. ' Ejusd. p, 254. n. 40. 106 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, now appeared no less resolute to give them away. On the other hand, some of those men who had deserved eternal infamy by the part which they had acted before to enslave their country, now hazarded their lives (at least as they pretended) to redeem the honour of the nation. Thus did the tyranny of the court of Rome, begun in the most direful cruelties to the souls of men about the year 1207, end in the most inhuman and unnatural cruelties of a civil war in the year 1215. However artfully both sides covered their pretensions, there seems no reason to doubt, but the resignation of the king was the true cause of this unhappy war. For though the Norman revo lution had made some changes to the disadvantage of the liberty and gentleness of the ancient English government, and the present king had made choice of such ministers and judges as had given just occasion of offence and complaint, yet taking arms against their prince was a thing hitherto so entirely unknown to the English nation, that it is impossible to think that the nobility, clergy, and people, could so universally have run into a defection, if there had not been more at the bottom of this war, than some arbitrary proceedings of an unsteady prince. But a free people and a vassal prince is a solecism in the very essence and being of a government ; and a well-established liberty under the reign of a prince who had given away his own freedom, was so vain and so ill-grounded an expectance, that the slightest reflection on this unhappy war presently leads one to think, that the demands of the barons and clergy were a cover to something else. Certain it is, that their undutifulness, or at least their cold ness in their services to the king, had done too much towards plunging him into the unhappy despair, which led him to enslave himself and his country ; and without a manifest reproach to themselves, they could not avow that to be the cause of the war, which was in a great measure owing to themselves. Besides, the interest of the king «and the papacy were too powerful to be openly opposed, and there was nothing so likely to divide them as that which seemed to preserve their deference to the court of Rome, and had the appearance of right, and law, and religion on its side. But the archbishop who formed the design of the barons, having publicly protested against the resignation of the king, and secretly favoured the proceedings of the barons, the king and the pope easily penetrated into the true reason of the war, and were fully satisfied that whatever the barons pretended, the king's becoming a vassal to the church of Rome was at the AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 107 bottom of this affair. Accordingly, the king in his letter to pope Innocent gives him this account of the conduct of his barons : " Whereas (saith he) the earls and barons of England were loyal to us before we resigned ourself and our kingdom to your domi nion, from that time and for that reason, as they publicly say, they have taken up arms against us a." The account of pope Innocent in his bull of excommunication against the barons is to the same purpose. " They (saith he) assisted the king whilst he perversely offended against Cod and his church, but presume to take up arms against him after he was converted, and hath given satisfaction to Cod and his church V And in his letter to archbishop Langton c, and in his bull by which he afterwards declared void the charter of the king, and the agree ment betwixt him and his barons which was founded thereon, he gives the same account of the beginning of this unhappy war d. And the original bull of that prelate, dated at Anagni the eighth of the calends of September, the eighteenth year of his pontificate, and yet remaining in the Cotton Library, is of the Aery same import. " In a perverse manner they rose up against the king- after he had satisfied the church, who assisted him whilst he was disobedient to the church e." Having laid these particulars together, to give the reader a just view of the true cause of this unhappy war, and of the arts made use of by both sides to give a popular turn to it, it will be time to return to observe the conduct thereof, and the effects which it produced. A war being thus begun, the barons seized the city of London, and became so very powerful, that the king quickly saw himself under a necessity of complying with their demands : therefore consenting to a meeting with some of their party, to find out a temper to accommodate this affair, Runnymede, betwixt Staines " Cum Comites et Barones Angliae nobis devoti essent antequam nos et nostram terrain Dominio vestro subjicere curassemus, extunc in nos specialiter ob hoc, sicut publice dicunt, violenter insurgunt. Prynn's Exact Hist. vol. iii. p. 33 ; et Rimeri, torn. i. p. 207. b Cum ipse Rex quasi perversus Deum et Ecclesiam offendebat, illi assiste- bant eidem ; cum autem conversus Deo et Ecclesiae satisfeeit, ipsum impug- nare prsesumuut. Prynn's Exact Hist. vol. iii. p. 2S. c Prynn's Exact Hist. vol. iii. p. 26. d Brady's Append. Hist. vol. i. p. 155. e Ordine perverso in ilium insurgunt postquam conversus Ecclesife satis- fecit, qui assistebant eidem quando Ecclesiam offendebat. Cotton. Cleo- pat. E. i. 108 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, and Windsor, was the place agreed upon, and the fifteenth of June (1215) the day appointed. This great assembly being met, an agreement was made, and contained in the two great charters known to this day by the name of Magna Charta and the Charta de Foresta, which still remain as the great standards of right and law, and continue the foundation and barriers to that happy government, which is the distinguishing blessing and glory of the English nation. — Thus did the wise pro vidence of God bring good out of evil, and raise a lasting monu ment to his own glory, from the miseries and confusion which seem to have threatened the ruin of our country and our govern ment. For though a charter was granted by Henry the First, and the first article of the great charter, which declares that the church is free, appears some ages before in the charter of Wightred king of Kent, and the articles of the great charter were not alto gether new concessions from the crown, but rather the ancient maxims and rules of law drawn into a body ; yet there is reason to think that it was the unhappy conduct of the king, which by giving the nation grounds to fear that they might too soon follow him into vassalage, and that their right could not long be safe when those of the crown were given away, that first gave beginning to that resolution which never ended, till it had settled the English government upon the bottom on which it remains to this day. But as reflections of this kind give a sensible pleasure to those who know how to put a just value upon the happiness of that form of government which God has placed us under, so it is no little mortification to give up so agreeable a thought, and turn to see every thing on a sudden hurried into a new confusion. Yet this was the case : for whether it was that the fickle and unconstant spirit of the king could not bear the confinement of stated rules of government ; or whether it was that the agreement betwixt the king and his people broke all the measures of that court, which had taken so much pains to enslave him, and could promise themselves no great advantage from his resignation, whilst his people continued safe and untouched under stated rules of law ; or whatever occasioned it, so it was that the king, who seems to have been influenced and governed by the ministers of pope Innocent, before the month was over, repented of the favours which he had granted to his people, and revoked his charters ; and the unhappy civil war broke out again, before the nation had time to reap any advantage from the late agreement betwixt the king and his barons. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 109 The king having thus changed his measures, sent away Pan dulphus, legate of pope Innocent, to Rome, to be absolved from the oath with which he had confirmed the charters which he had lately granted to the barons, and to have those charters declared void ; and sent Walter Gray bishop of Worcester, his chancellor, John bishop of Norwich, and some other ambassadors, abroad, to give an account of this affair, and to procure forces to assist him ; and sent his directions to his governors of castles and forts in England, to provide for their defence ; and the better to secure his person till he could bring a foreign force to his assistance, he retired himself to the Isle of Wight. In the mean time the barons who were in possession of London, entertained themselves with tilts and tournaments, but were so far puffed up by their late success, that they seemed to despise the preparations of the king, rather than to provide against them. Whilst things passed in this manner in England, the ambas sadors of the king arrived at Rome, where pope Innocent, who was ever watchful over the interest of that court, and could not but see the secret springs which set this affair into motion, upon the first hearing of it, immediately answered in great anger, " What ? do the barons of England endeavour to dethrone a king, who has taken upon him the cross and is under the protection of the apostolic see, and to transfer the dominion of the Roman church tb another?" and then swore by St. Peter, " This injury should not pass unpunished a." As he judged truly, that the interest of the court of Rome was bound up in that of the king, so he met the desires of his ambas sadors with all the zeal and ardour the importance of the embassy required, and by a bull declared the aforesaid charters void ; and by another commanded the barons to lay down their arms and to return to their duty, and pronounced them excommunicate in case of refusal. And when this would not do, he issued a third bull excommunicating the barons by name, and sent his command to the archbishop of Canterbury to appoint the publication of that sentence through his province every Sunday. And before the end of the year, in the council held in the Lateran, he again confirmed his sentence against the barons b : and in all the transactions upon this subject, pope Innocent acted up to his new character of lord of England and Ireland, with a pride and haughtiness equalled only by the ambition and wickedness with which he had aspired to it, and upon every occasion wrote and spake of king * M. Par. ann. 1215. p. 266. b Concil. torn. ii. par. i. p. 237. ed. Lab. 1 10 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, John as his vassal, and the kingdoms of England and Ireland as fees of the papacy \ Things having passed thus at Rome (1215), the necessity of the king's affairs made his ambassadors hasten away to England : and Peter bishop of Winchester, being joined in the commission with Pandulphus, they immediately applied themselves to execute the aforesaid bulls ; and in order thereto addressed the archbishop of Canterbury, to cause them to be published through his province. But that prelate, under pretence that he was going to Rome, desired to be excused, till by personal conference with pope Inno cent he might lay the matter rightly before him a. But the king, who had by this time drawn a considerable force together, by the terror of his arms easily obtained what the archbishop had denied, and the sentence of excommunication against the barons, and their abettors and adherents, was generally pronounced, and except in London, where the barons chiefly resided, was as gene rally obeyed. Besides this, the king besieged and took the castle 1 Fees of the papacy.] "When you tell me that we are indebted to the Roman Catholic religion for Magna Charta, had you forgotten, Sir, that the pope, as he whom God had appointed over nations and kingdoms, reprobated and condemned that charter; pronounced it, in all its clauses, null and void ; for bade the king to observe it ; inhibited the barons (who, being instigated by the devil, he said, had extorted these concessions in degradation of the crown), from requiring its execution, and suspended the primate Langton for refusing to excommunicate them on this account ? To Langton, indeed, we are deeply indebted for the noble part which he took in obtaining the charter from the king, and in his yet nobler conduct in maintaining it against the pope. But to the Roman Catholic religion, as acting under its acknowledged head, these are our obligations on the score of Magna Charta ! "Where, Sir, was your memory, when you claimed our gratitude to the papal church for this great charter of our liberties ; or where did you suppose was mine ? Had you forgotten that another pope, in the plenitude of his power, absolved another king of England from his solemn engagement to observe that charter, pronouncing that, if the king had sworn to observe it, he had sworn, previously, to maintain the rights of the crown ; — to those rights the charter was derogatory, and to that prior oath regard mast first be paid ; and therefore pope Clement V. released Edward I. from all promises pre judicial to his ancient prerogative ? I have usually to thank you, Sir, when you send me to my books. — These, I repeat it, are our obligations to the Romish religion on the score of Magna Charta ? — And it is worth noting by the way, you have here the opinion of the pope ex cathedra, that the king's coronation oath is paramount to all other engagements and considerations." — Southey's Vindicice Ecclesice Anglican® ; Letters to Charles Butler, Esq. p. 369, 70. " M. Par. ann. 1215. p. 271. n. 50. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 111 of Dover, and the barons having no army sufficient to oppose him, he every where laid their towns and villages waste, and before the end of this year had a fair prospect of reducing them to his obedience by force. Meanwhile the court of Rome had an affair of the greatest importance on their hands ; and this was to give the finishing stroke to that ecclesiastic monarchy which they had been raising by degrees. Pope Innocent had been extremely fortunate in the steps which he had made, and had carried the grandeur of that court to such a height, that one may be allowed to say, the glories of the papacy did never shine so bright as under the pon tificate of that prelate. And as he judged truly of the present state of the papacy, so he hastened to put the last hand to it, by triumphing at once over the whole Christian church, which he and his predecessors had despoiled and broken by degrees. In order hereto he called a council, known by the name of the fourth Lateran Council, which met this year (1215), and was held in Rome in November under pope Innocent. Concerting measures for carrying on the war in Palestine, and the reformation of the church, were the pretended reasons for calling this assembly together. But when pope Innocent in his sermon at the opening of the council thought fit to speak out, he tells them, that if occasion was, " he was ready to die for the ecclesiastic liberty," and (according to his mysterious and allegorical way of speaking) that "though to live was Christ and to die was gain, yet it was his desire to continue in the flesh, till the work should be consum mated which was begun a." And if perfecting the ecclesiastic monarchy was not this work, and the true secret which lay at the bottom of this council, one who considers the history, the canons, and the methods of proceeding therein, will find it very difficult to be of another opinion. For if we take the whole together, this council is one of the most surprising scenes that the world ever produced ; and what ever was designed by it, this assembly has drawn the ecclesiastic monarchy in its brightest glory and lustre, and gives us such a view of the power and grandeur of the papacy as is no where else to be found : and which I am more concerned to consider, it gives so much light to the affairs of the English church, that one cannot forbear to observe the occasion, the conduct, and the issue of this council. Besides the general uneasiness which the Holy War occasioned, " M. Par. ann. 1215. col. 131. 112 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, there was scarce a nation in Europe that had not about this time some particular embroil. That of England is too well known to need repeating : France was engaged in a war with Flanders and the emperor Otho; Spain torn to pieces by the Moors and Saracens ; the parties of Otho and Frederic divided and em broiled the empire ; and the late violent revolution in the eastern empire had occasioned such convulsions therein, as were never cured till the empire itself became a prey to the Turks. Such was the state of Europe when the council, which met this year, was summoned in the year 1213; and if a change was made before the council met, or the present state of Europe was any ways different from what it was two years since, the change was rather for the worse, and the affairs thereof still more embroiled. And as if these had not been calamities sufficient, the court of Rome was every where employing their arts and authority to raise men and money, for the succour of the east, as was pretended. Whilst Europe then was in this posture, pope Innocent sum moned a general council by his own authority : for which end he sent his monitions to the eastern and western emperors, to the kings of England, France, Spain, Arragon, Hungary, and Sicily, to oblige them to send ambassadors to that assembly. The like summons was sent to the four eastern patriarchs, as well as to the metropolitans of the western churches : and the conduct of this council was answerable to the majesty with which it was convened. That prelate thus assumed to himself this great branch of the imperial and royal authority, by which all general and national councils had been called for above a thousand years after Christ ; and instead of receiving a summons from the emperor, as all his predecessors had done to the eight first general councils, he sent his monitions to all Christian princes. — And it could not be ex pected, that he should use their clergy better than he had used their masters; and indeed the style, and canons, and form of passing them, plainly show, that he esteemed the bishops and clergy who came to this council, no otherwise than as his subjects and his council, and not as the representatives of the Christian church ; whereas the learned writer of the history of the councils has well observed, that in all the ancient councils the method was first to consider and debate, and then each bishop having written his suffrage with his own hand a, the matter under consideration was determined by the majority of voices, and the decree ran in the name of the council. And this, as that author saith, was a * Richer. Hist. Concil. lib. i. p. 766. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 113 method well suited to that aristocracy which Christ had established in His church, and the method which has been continued in such assemblies, from the first council of the apostles till the time of Gregory the seventh a. But as that learned writer has abundantly proved that the court of Rome broke down the primitive constitution of the Christian church, and set up an ecclesiastic monarchy instead of that form which Christ had erected, and by which the apostles and first ages of the church had ever acted; so he makes it appear, that the proceedings of this council were answerable to the change which the ambition and artifices of the court of Rome had introduced. " For (saith he) pope Innocent neither suffered the bishops to debate, or to give their votes, or the decrees to run in the name, or to pass by the authority, of the council ; but he by his own creatures first prepared the decrees, and then published them, not as the acts of the council, but by his own proper authority b." And a late learned and excellent writer of the same communion follows him in that opinion, and saith, " It is certain, that the aforesaid canons were not made by the council, but by pope Innocent the third, who presented them to the council ready drawn up, and ordered them to be read ; and that the pre lates did not enter into debate upon them c." And indeed the aforesaid learned writer of the history of the councils has truly observed, that this was the case of all the papal councils from the pontificate of Gregory the seventh : they were so far from being free, that they were entirely governed by the particular interests of the court of Rome, and the canons thereof delivered as the edicts of an absolute monarch d. But whatever was the case of other councils, it is so evident that this was the case of the aforesaid council under pope Innocent, that if there had been no other proof, the turn and the style, and the spirit that every where appear in the canons thereof, are enough to lead one to the method and form in which they were conceived and published. For whereas the constant style of the ancient councils was, "decernimus et synodi autoritate robo- ramus e," we decree and confirm by the authority of the synod ; Gregory the seventh, who projected the change in the government of the church, first began, and pope Innocent followed him in this ¦ Richer. Hist. Concil. lib. i. p. 769. b Ejusd. p. 766. c Du Pin, Eccles. Hist. vol. xi. p. 95. d Richer. Hist. Concil. lib. i. p. 766. » Ejusd. p. 769. vol. I. i 114 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, form, " nos sacro approbante concilio decernimus," we decree with the approbation of the synod. But very often the canons run in his own name, and ascribe the decreeing power to himself, without mentioning the authority of the council : and in that decree, by which he charged the whole clergy with the payment of a twen tieth part of their yearly revenues for the space of three years, towards defraying the charges of the war in Palestine, he pretends no further than that it was with the approbation ofthe council a. In short, some things are ascribed to the advice, and others to the persuasions, of the council b, whilst the haughty monarch arrogates the decreeing power to himself. As he thus treated this assembly, and under the cover thereof imposed his own maxims on the world, the persons of the clergy and religious were, if it was possible, used worse than their au thority. For having under the colour of this council drawn them to Rome, he put his own price upon them, and before he would suffer them to depart, he made them take up money from the merchants of Rome, whom he had appointed to furnish them to supply his wants c- Among the rest, William abbot of St. Alban's had an hundred marks extorted from him d, and the new arch bishop of York was charged with ten thousand marks ; and if we have not the particular charges on the other prelates, our historian is positive that by this method pope Innocent raised infinite sums of money " ; or, to speak more properly, by a treachery and vio lence beyond all example, he robbed those whom he had first de ceived into the snare under the pretence of religion. This horrible practice will, it may be, give us the best account of that mighty zeal with which this assembly was convened, and such numbers drawn together at a time when all Christendom was in a ferment, and the presence of the clergy and religious so necessary at home. But if this circumstance, and the interest the court of Rome served by it, be not enough to set the reason of this assembly in a true light, it will be in vain to look to the canons themselves, or to the controversies or heresies of the age for our guide. But whatever occasioned the convening of this council, one who observes the air of majesty and authority which every where appears, in the monitions sent by pope Innocent to the emperors and other Christian princes of Europe, and to the bishops as well • Concil. torn. xi. par. i. col. 228. b Ibid. c M. Par. ann. 1215. p. 274. n. 10. d M. Par. vit. Abbat. S. Alban. p. 117. e Ibid. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 115 of the eastern as the western churches ; with what assurance that prelate, without the consent of the princes and states of Europe, forbade the raising of money for the time to come on the estates of the clergy and religious by the secular power, without the con sent of the bishops of Rome, whilst at the same time he laid an imposition of a twentieth part on the whole estate of the church ; how magisterially he commanded every city to send or to pay a number of men for the Holy War, and declared it the right of the papacy to give away the dominions of princes ; with what assurance that prelate put the doctrine of deposing princes upon the world, under the pretended authority of an assembly, wherein the ambassadors of most of the princes of Europe were present ; how arbitrarily he extorted vast sums of money from the clergy and religious who met in this council ; and, which is more still, how tamely they suffered their persons to be ill-treated, and their authority abused, to serve all the purposes of the ambitious court which convened them ; has a view and an example of such blind ness and infatuation on the one side, and of such ambition and exorbitant power on the other, as the world could have no idea of before the reign of pope Innocent. The archbishop of Canterbury was at Rome whilst this council was held there, and if he did not make his peace with pope Inno cent, yet it seems very probable, he obtained the recalling of his suspension, partly by giving security to abide by the judgment of that court, and partly by the same methods by which that court served their ends on the rest of the assembly. But the barons of England fell irrevocably under his displeasure, and were in this council excommunicated by pope Innocent with all their adherents and abettors, and with all that should attempt to seize or invade the kingdom of England : and the reason that prelate gives, is, " because (as he speaks) the illustrious king of England had taken upon him the cross, and was the vassal of the Roman church a." Having thus long insisted on the transactions of this council, partly to show the reader what the court of Rome meant by the ecclesiastic liberty ; and partly to show to what a height they had by this time carried their usurpation, by offering to his view the triumphs of that court over the Christian and secular authority in this great assembly, which is said to consist of four hundred and twelve bishops ; and partly to enable the reader, by this view of the papacy, to conceive how it came to pass, that the weight of a Concil. torn. xi. par. i. p. 237. ed. Lab. l 2 116 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, that court first turned the scale against king John and then for him, and to give him light enough to judge truly of the reason of the ill success with which the succeeding kings of England made so many laws to restrain and set bounds to the papal usurpation ; it is but time to return, and to observe how the transactions of this assembly operated in England. King John, having drawn together a pretty good army, the latter end ofthe last year (1215) made such use of it, that before the year was done the barons were reduced to such circumstances, that they who had carried all before them in the beginning of the year, before it was ended saw themselves in no condition to resist the forces of the king : and this threw them into despair, and gave a new turn to this unhappy war, and brought the dishonour and guilt upon the barons, which they had before charged upon the king and the court of Rome. For having drawn the sword against their prince, they took sanctuary in the maxim which advises to throw away the scabbard ; and seeing their party likely to be overwhelmed, they sent their agents to Philip king of France, with the tender of the crown and kingdom of England to his son prince Lewis : and to give all assurance of their sincerity and endeavours to assist that prince, some of the sons of the greatest of the barons were sent as hostages into France. Having thus given security for the performance of what they had promised to the French king, his son Lewis, whose heat and ambition outstripped the precaution and slower methods of his father, immediately engaged in this war, and had all the assistance his father could give ; and a body of men was in the beginning of this year sent to England to the aid of the barons. This league was not transacted so privately, but the king of England and the court of Rome easily saw into it, and omitted no endeavours that appeared likely to frustrate and disappoint it. In order whereto, the king not only set himself to secure the sea- coast, and to provide a fleet, but sent his ambassadors to France, with such offers to the French king as he thought most likely to divert the storm. Pope Innocent, who well saw that the interest of the court of Rome was bound up in that of. the king, laid out all his zeal and endeavours for his security : and. as his commis sioners in England issued out his thunders against the barons, and in the cathedral and conventual churches did every Sunday repeat their anathema and excommunication against them ; so by AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 117 his legate in France he endeavoured to withdraw the French king from this undertaking, and to engage him to keep his son at home. In order hereto Walo *, who was the legate sent to France, remonstrated against the intended expedition to England, and represented it as " no less injurious to the Romish church than to the king of England ; for (saith he) the king of England has sworn fidelity to the bishop and church of Rome, and holds his kingdoms by an annual tribute of the church of Rome, they being the patrimony of St. Peter." But king Philip, who about four years before was so thoroughly convinced of the right of the papacy to give away the crown of England, that he himself took a title from the holy chair, and was at the head of an army to make good his pretence by force, by a new turn of interest now lost all his former quickness and penetration of mind, and notwithstanding the change which the resignation of king John had made to the great advantage of the papacy, that prince could not bear the aforesaid pretence of the legate with common patience, but replied in anger to what the legate had said of England being a fief of the papacy, "that England never was, nor is, nor ever shall be, the patrimony of St. Peter3." Therefore, though he pretended the most profound veneration for the holy see, and sent his ambassador to Rome to set this matter right, and to prevent the thunders which might come from thence, and seemed not to allow the intended expedition of his son ; yet at the same time he furnished him with a fleet and an army, and gave him his blessing when he set out for England. — Every thing being ready for that design, prince Lewis set forward about the middle of May, (1216,) and arrived the one-and- twentieth. King John thought fit to retire, and Lewis landed without any opposition at Sandwich, and not long after came to London, where he was received with great joy by the barons ; and as king of England he received their homage, and swore to observe the laws of England. And that posterity might not be deceived in judging of the party by which this interest was managed, before he left London, 1 In order hereto Walo.] Guala, of the noble family of the Bicchieri of Vercelli, of which place he was bishop. He was legate in France and England (he crowned Henry III.): he was a great patron of learning, and founded the monastery at Vercelli, where his library (a rich one for the. time) still.exists. ¦ M. Par. ann. 1216. p. 280. n. 40., 118 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, king Lewis appointed Simon Langton, late archbishop elect of York, and brother to the archbishop of Canterbury, for his chan cellor. Not long after the arrival of prince Lewis, Walo legate to pope Innocent came into England, and went to king John, who was retired to Gloucester with his army. His presence gave new life to the affairs of the king ; for as he excommunicated prince Lewis and the barons, with the solemnity of tolling the bells and lighting of torches, and thereby made such impressions on the Commons of England as were of some use to the king ; so by cry ing up the merit of assisting him and the holy Roman church, and by the assurances which he gave of the blessing and assist ances of the holy chair, he prevented the general desertion that prince had some reason to fear, and gave so much vigour to the army of the king, that he soon saw himself in a capacity to reduce a great part of the west of England to his obedience. On the other hand, prince Lewis and the barons, having con certed measures, did with their forces leave London about the middle of June, and, excepting the castles of Dover and Windsor, did in a little time reduce all the south of England. And the armies on both sides being so near equal, that neither party thought fit to attempt to force the other to a decision by a battle, the nation was the common subject of their fury ; for whilst each party applied itself to reduce the cities and castles to their obe dience, their animosities and revenge were so much alike, that desolation and blood attended them wheresoever they went, and all the miseries of an intestine war overspread the nation. But whilst one leaves this melancholy scene to the relation of those to whom it more properly belongs, the design of this under taking will, I hope, permit *ne to carry the reader back to that unhappy affair of the church, which gave beginning to it : and this was the election of Stephen Langton, archbishop of Canterbury, or, to speak more properly, the attempt of pope Innocent and the court of Rome to force an archbishop " upon the kingdom (1206) ; for it was that pretence which gave beginning to the war. When it was first started, the nation seemed to have no apprehensions of the consequences which in time ensued : but that usurpation which at the first appearance of it was like the prophet's cloud, no bigger than one's hand, like that too grew up into a darkness which covered the face of the whole kingdom ; and in the dire events 1 To force an archbishop.] See above, p. 7.9, and below, p. 121. n. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 119 thereof has shown us, how dangerous it is to break in upon the legal and ancient constitutions of a kingdom, and to make subjects too great to obey, or princes too little to govern. For if one may be allowed to judge and to speak freely, one cannot forbear to say, this was too much our case. The clergy fondly flattered themselves with a belief, that the power snatched from the king would fall into their own hands, and that they should gain all that the king lost, by taking the patronage of bishoprics from the crown l . The nobility were jealous of the king, 1 From the crown.] I venture to introduce here a note of great length from Inett ; but I hope the importance of the topics, and the ability with which they are handled, will justify the insertion. " The aforesaid disappointment of the clergy and religious made a great addition to the prevailing discontents of the nation ; and it is not unlikely but that it made some impressions on the king and the legate, and gave the first thought to a charter made by him, and confirmed by pope Innocent, the latter end of this or the beginning of the following year (1214) ; that is, to that charter by which king John granted a general freedom of elections to all cathedrals and convents. And if this and some other concessions of this kind by the predecessors of this prince were not the best grounds upon which the sole rights of capitular elections were founded, yet certainly the claims founded upon antiquity and the usage of the primitive church, and much more those said to be built on the commission of Christ, and a pre tence that princes have nothing to do in the affairs ofthe church and religion, are attended with so many difficulties, as would tempt one to think that they are mistaken who embark in bottoms of this kind. "The grant of the king makes no difference betwixt the claims of the secu lar canons and the monastics, and upon this foot this affair was finally settled in the Western church by the council of Basil. But however reasonable it might appear to allow the colleges of presbyters a great part in the choice of bishops in the first ages, yet the very reason on which that usage was founded, overturns the pretence of the cathedral monks ; for a right of a body of laymen founded on the usage of. the college of presbyters has so little foundation in truth and reason, that there is much better ground to affirm those institutions a reproach and contradiction to the sense and prac tice of the ancient church, rather than any way countenanced by them. And if the primitive bishops had lived to see themselves deprived of the counsel and assistance of their presbyters, and beheld their cathedrals exempted from their jurisdiction, and those who possessed them withdrawn from their obe dience, their authority denied, their counsels frustrated, their very order les sened ; in short, had they but tasted of those troubles which those bodies drew down upon their successors, it would have set fire to their zeal, shocked all their patience, and their practice and their canons would have had so different a turn, as would have left no colour for the claims which were in time pretended to be supported by them. " The claim of the secular canons has in the first view a much better colour ; 120 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, and had the vanity to hope, that their liberties would be safer, if the interest of the crown was made less. And the nomination of for as they were colleges of presbyters, and so came much nearer the primi tive institutions of those bodies, their claim was in proportion so much better grounded. But when it is considered, that the primitive church allowed the bishops of the province, and the people as well as the clergy, a share in the choice of bishops j it will seem unreasonable to found a right upon a prac tice which opposes and contradicts the claims that are built upon it, or to conclude solely in favour of capitular elections, from an usage which equally proves the right of the bishops and the people and the clergy of the diocese. " Besides, whatever veneration is due to the example ofthe best ages, usages which are not founded upon a divine right, must ever stand or fall with the reasons that support them. Thus the feasts of charity, the holy kiss, the orders of deaconnesses, and many other usages of the first ages, did by de grees run into desuetude, and were finally banished with the reasons that gave them a beginning. So that however reasonable it might appear to allow the clergy and people a share in the choice, whilst the districts of the bishops were chiefly confined to cities, and the presbyters residing with them at the Mother Church were in a manner the whole clergy of the diocese ; yet the case at this time was so very different, when dioceses were extended to bounds much wider than some kingdoms under the Saxon heptarchy, and the clergy spread as far as the diocese, that if the usage of the ancient church prove any thing at all, it proves too much to serve the interest of the present claims, and entitles the whole clergy and people of the diocese to the choice of bishops. " But because the right which the kings of England had long enjoyed, and which was about this time (1214) given away by king John, has been resumed by the crown, and the honour of the church and nation seems very much concerned in the disputes upon this subject ; it may not be amiss to observe, that the question at this time was not whether Christ had founded a church, or vested a power in the apostles and their successors to set apart men to minister in holy things ; whether this designation was necessary, or whether they who were entrusted with the conveyance of a power to preach the gospel, might not judge finally of the abilities and sufficiency of the persons to whom' this trust was committed. These were disputes reserved as a judgment on the later ages, wherein Erastianism, profaneness, and enthu siasm have attempted the foundations of the church of Christ, but were not so much as thought of at this time. And it. is very evident, that when the claim of the kings of England was carried to the greatest lengths, they never pretended to convey a spiritual power ; but on the contrary, the law which establishes the patronage of the crown, does in the very letter as well as in the reason of it allow the original right of the church of Christ; and by limiting the right of the crown to a legal and preparatory designation of persons, and conferring a right to the wealth, the powers,, and privileges de rived from the state, whilst it requires bishops to confer the character, the law itself amounts to a recognition of the inherent right and power of the church. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 121 persons to vacant bishoprics, which till within a few years had been enjoyed unquestioned by the kings of England, was one of " This was all that was contended for at the election of the present arch bishop (Langton) : it was the choice of the person who was to receive the character of a bishop, not the right to convey it, which was the subject of dispute. And the several claims turned upon the same foot : the pretence of the monks was founded on their relation to the Mother Church of the diocese of Canterbury; that ofthe bishops on their relation to the province, and not on their order as bishops ; and that of the king on the patronage of the crown, whilst the sole right of bishops to confer the order was allowed on all sides ; and since it is the order which makes the bishop, and not the previous choice, these different claims seem equally reconcileable to the inhe rent power of the church to confer the character. They who do not or will not see the difference, but confound these two things, or throw them together in the divine commission, and tell us that the choice as well as the consecra tion of bishops is one of the inherent rights of the church, do at once over turn all the claims of the secular power : but at the same time they shock the pretence to capitular elections, for which themselves so earnestly contend ; they give up the canons and usages, and, which is more, they reproach the practice, of the whole Christian church ; and more especially of the cathedral monks, who, generally speaking, were nothing else but bodies of laymen through the whole western kingdoms : for if a claim of this extent lie within the bounds of the divine commission, it ought certainly to be placed amongst the rights of that order of men, to whom Christ has principally committed the care of His church. — Besides, this will put an end to all the rights of patronage allowed by the whole Christian world ; for the extent or narrow limits of a cure of souls cannot alter the nature of the trust, and make that a sin in one case, which is a matter of common right in another : and the dis tinction of order can in reason make no difference in the case ; for he who presents a priest to take care of a parish, and he who nominates a bishop to govern a diocese, do equally choose a minister of Christ, and equally invade the right of the holy order of bishops, if they only have a right to choose the person whose only right it is to confer the character. And therefore the second council of Nice (can. 3), which applies that to the choice which the first council of Nice had said of the consecration of bishops, and upon this ground appoints that bishops should only have the choice of bishops, does also in the same canon determine, that they only should have the choice of priests. But, after all, this council is so far from fixing this upon the divine commis sion, that the council of Constantinople in the year 869 (which is, if I mistake not, the only council which pursues the steps of the second council of Nice, and limits the elections of patriarchs, metropolitans, and bishops, to the college of the church, can. 28) grounds the canon relating to this subject on preventing confusion and strife, and the indecency of seculars intermed dling in affairs of this kind : and the council of Laodicea, probably on the same ground, had some ages before determined, that the election of bishops should not be wholly left to the people (can. 12) : but neither of these 122 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, the most considerable rights of the crown : therefore when this right was invaded, and pope Innocent had imposed an archbishop councils give us the least intimation of the divine right, for which some later writers contend. "The council of Aries is the reverse of the aforesaid councils of Nice and Constantinople, and at once fixes the choice in the bishops and the people, but forbids their nomination by bishops (can. 35). The council of Orleans, in the year 533, kept up to the ancient practice, and required that metropo litans should be chosen by the bishops, the clergy, and people of the province (can. 7) : and that of Clermont, about two years after, allows the right of the bishops, the clergy, and people (can. 2). But a later council of Orleans, about the year 549, requires the consent of the king (can. 10). That of Paris, in the year 557, establishes the right of the people, and deter mines that no bishop should be put upon a city without the consent of the people (can. 8) : and that of Cabilon directs the choice of bishops by the bishops of the province, the clergy, and people (can. 10). — But all this, while there is not a syllable to be found of capitular elections, unless what is said of the college of the church by the council of Constantinople can be interpreted in favour of that pretence. " We may add to this, that the apostles put the choice of deacons into the hands of the people, and upon the death of Judas empowered the disciples to choose two men out of their number, to fill up the vacancy in the apostolic college; and that these examples were the guides to the future ages of the church. If all this was encroachment on the divine com mission, the blame will lie upon those who best understood the rights of the Christian church, and who were never blamed for betraying it : and yet so we must call this practice of the apostles and of the whole Christian world, if the choice of the person as well as conveying the character of a bishop be equally limited to the divine commission. For they who can discharge the apostles and primitive bishops, must acquit their successors too, and whilst they justify the favours which the former allowed to the people, can never reasonably condemn the latter for submitting to the claim of princes; unless they turn their reasoning another way, and, instead of an encroachment on the rights of the church, think fit to call it an usurpation on the rights ofthe people. " But if the canons and practice of the whole Christian church, founded on that of the apostles, can no otherwise be justified but upon a supposition of a prudential power in the church, to adjust and settle rules for the choice of bishops ; whatever can be said on the side of the people, will equally justify the rights of princes. And in a national church, where the extent of dioceses has rendered the choice by the clergy and people utterly impracticable, and the people have by their representatives yielded up their claims, and civil rights and a political capacity are to accompany the character of a bishop ; it seems as reasonable that princes should name the persons, as it is to allow them to dispose their own favours, and pi-ovide for the good government of their people. " They who give too much liberty to an intemperate and misguided zeal, and think fit to call this disfranchising the church, and speak of churches under AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 123 on the kingdom, and the king, with the resolution that became him, set himself to defend the rights of his crown, some of his these circumstances as in a worse condition than under persecution, might upon as good ground and with equal hopes of success persuade Christians to beheve, that it is the interest of the gospel to dissolve national churches, renounce the protection of princes, and return to the primitive state of persecution. — But if those holy bishops who, by sad experience, knew what that meant, had lived to see their persons guarded by the civil power, their churches endowed from the bounty, their censures enforced by the sanctions of the state, the rehgion of Christ shining in the lives of princes and attended by all encouragements of law, they would have blessed God for the change, and thought churches safe and happy under the patronage of princes ; and whilst they sacredly preserved to themselves the right to convey the character, would have prevented their wishes in allowing them that interest in the choice of bishops, which they had voluntarily and unasked for put into the hands of the lower clergy and the people. — And this was all that was contended for by the king of England, and no more than his ancestors had long enjoyed. " If it be said, that a power of this kind may be abused ; one must be a stranger to human nature who doubts the truth, and to the world who does not allow the weight of this objection. But he who argues against a right from the possibility of abusing it, may upon the same ground overturn all the natural and legal rights of mankind : and even the spiritual power which Christ has committed to His church, must sink under the weight of this argument, if this be a just way of reasoning ; for it is evident, past all con tradiction, that this is capable of being abused, to serve purposes for which the holy Jesus never designed it. " But to go no further for an instance than the subject now before us : one who looks backward and finds above twenty schisms in the Western church, occasioned chiefly by the elections of the bishops of Rome ; that the con troversies on this head cost a great deal of blood, brought great scandal and reproach upon rehgion, and very much served the interest of paganism ; will see cause enough to believe, that princes are not the only persons who may abuse a trust of this kind. Or if we look at home and go no further than the election just now before us, and observe that the sub-prior was chosen in the night, the bishop of Norwich at the instance of king John, Stephen Langton by the menaces of pope Innocent ; there will need no other proof that capitular bodies are subject to practice. And one who observes the whole course of that affair whilst the power of elections continued in such bodies, and the consequences thereof, will find Uttle reason to complain of the change. " If it be thought that things of this nature would be better managed were that usage restored again, he that will observe what a scene of intrigue and politics attends the election of every new bishop of Rome, may possibly see ground enough to change his mind. And one who will think fit to consider, that disengaging the bishops of Rome from their dependence on the emperors, by taking out of their hands the power to nominate or confirm the bishops of that see, was the first step and indeed the foundation upon which 124 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, nobility left him to himself, at least they were very cold and indif ferent ; others did secretly favour his enemies, and by their cold- Gregory the seventh raised the usurpation, so fatal to the doctrine and government of the whole Christian church; that the same method let the clergy loose from their dependence on the western princes, and made the bishops of Rome masters of all capitular elections, and in consequence thereof of synods and councils ; and what ill use those prelates made of that power in the west ; may possibly find matter enough to balance all that learned men have said of the abuses of the regale in the east. And which is more, they who will reflect on the fatal consequences of the expeditions of the Latins against the eastern empire, and consider by whom they were set on foot, by whom they were managed and whose interest they served, will find a plainer way of accounting for the destruction of the Greek church than some learned writers have lately done, and may upon better grounds charge it on that usurpation which raised itself upon the ruins of the regalia, rather than on the abuses of that important trust. " But whatever was the ground, and whatever was the effect of that claim abroad, it is certain, the nomination to bishoprics had long been esteemed a branch of the royal patronage of the kings of England ; that the church had flourished whilst the just power of the crown was preserved, and was divided, distracted and oppressed, when that languished and decayed. — But I am sensible that I have wronged the patience of the reader and must ask his pardon, and lead him to observe, when and by whom it was given away. And we shall be called too soon to behold the ill effects of this concession : however, for the reason before mentioned, king John gave up his right to the patronage of bishoprics and abbeys about this time, and pope Innocent thought fit to confirm the grant." Inett, p. 457 — 62. — Compare Inett, vol. ii. p. 94—100, and 365, 6. Long as this note is, we must still add further to it, by extracts of con siderable length from Hooker, and from Twisden. First, from Hooker. — " Touching the advancement of prelates unto their rooms by the king ; whereas it seemeth in the eyes of many a thing very strange, that prelates, the officers of God's own sanctuary, than which nothing is more sacred, should be made by persons secular, there are that will not have kings to be altogether of the laity, but to participate that sanctified power which God hath endowed his clergy with ; and that in such respect they are anointed with oil, — a shift vain and needless. Forasmuch as, if we speak properly, we cannot say kings do make, but they only do place, bishops. For in a bishop there are these three things to be considered ; — the power whereby he is distinguished from other pastors ; the special portion of the clergy and people over whom he is to exercise that bishoply power ; and the place of his seat or throne, together with the profits, pre-eminences, honours, thereunto belonging. The first every bishop hath by consecration ; the second his election investeth him with ; the third he receiveth of the king alone. " With consecration the king intermeddleth not further than only by his letters to present such an elect bishop as shall be consecrated. Seeing there fore that none but bishops do consecrate, it followeth that none, but they only AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 125 ness and backwardness and intrigues did so much towards the king's resignation ofthe crown, that their agents at Rome thought fit to tell pope Innocent, it was they who forced him to it 3. do give unto every bishop his being. The manner of uniting bishops as heads under the flock and clergy under them, hath often altered. For, if some be not deceived, this thing was sometime done even without any election at all. ' At the first ' (saith he to whom the name of Ambrose is given) ' the first created in the college of presbyters was still the bishop. He dying, the next senior did succeed him.' .... " In elections, at the beginning, the clergy and the people both had to do, although not both after one sort. The people gave their testimony, and showed their affection, either of desire or dislike, concerning the party which was to be chosen : but the choice was wholly in the sacred college of presbyters " That difference, which is between the form of electing bishops at this day with us, and that which was usual in former ages, riseth from the ground of that right which the kings of this land do claim in furnishing the place where bishops, elected and consecrated, are to reside as bishops. For considering the huge charges which the ancient famous princes of this land have been at, as well in erecting episcopal sees, as also in endowing them with ample pos sessions, sure, out of their religious magnificence and bounty, we cannot but think them to have been most deservedly honoured with those royal preroga tives, of taking the benefit which groweth out of them in their vacancy, and of advancing alone unto such dignities what persons they judge most fit for the same. A thing over and besides even therefore the more reasonable, for that as the king most justly hath pre-eminence to make lords temporal which are not such by right of birth, so the hke pre-eminence of bestowing where pleaseth him the honour of spiritual nobility also, cannot seem hard, bishops being peers of the realm, and by law itself so reckoned. " Now, whether we grant so much unto kings in this respect, or in the former consideration whereupon the laws have annexed it unto the crown, it must of necessity, being granted, both make void whatsoever interests the people aforetime hath had towards the choice of their own bishop, and also restrain the very act of canonical election usually made by the dean and chapter : as with us, in such sort it doth that they neither can proceed in any election till leave be granted, nor elect any person but that who is named unto them. If they might do the one, it would be in them to defeat the king of his profits ; if the other, then were the king's pre-eminences of granting those dignities nothing. And therefore, were it not for certain canons requiring canonical election to be before consecration, I see no cause but that the king's letters patents alone might suffice well enough to that purpose ; as by law they do, in case those electors should happen not to satisfy the king's pleasure. Their election is now but a matter of form : it is the king's mere grant which placeth, and the bishop's consecration which maketh, bishops. " Neither do the kings of this land use herein any other than such pre- * Prynn's Exact Hist. vol. iii. p. 29. 126 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, Though this was said to serve a turn, yet it is very probable that if the barons and clergy had been just to the rights of the rogatives as foreign nations have been accustomed unto . . . " Hooker, B. viii. c. vii. § 1—4. Vol. iii. p. 524—9. Keble's edit. We now come to Twisden. " Before I enter into the dispute of the rights the kings of England did exercise in the regimen of the church, I hold it not unnecessary to see in what divines hold that ecclesiastic authority doth consist. "Bellarmine, Turreoremata, and others, divide spiritual power into (1) Ordinis, which they refer to the administration of the sacraments ; and (2) Jurisdictionis : which latter they hold to be double ; (1) internal, where the divine by persuasions, wholesome instructions, ghostly counsel, and the like, so convinces the inward conscience, that it is wholly obedient to his dictates (such as those of St. Peter were in Acts ii. 37) : and (2) external; where the church, inforo exteriori, compels the Christian's obedience. " Now for the first and second of these our king did not take upon him at all to meddle. For he neither assumed to himself a power of preaching, teaching, binding or loosing inforo animee, administering the holy sacraments, conferring orders, nor any particular that is properly annexed to them. Only he took upon himself such things as are of the outward policy of the church : such as, that God may be truly served ; they that transgress the received lawful constitutions, even of the church, may be fitly punished, &c. : these, and the like by the rights of his crown, and the continued practice of his ancestors, he could not doubt but he might deal in; causing all, be they clerks or others that offend, to suffer condign punishment." Vindication, p. 93. 4to. 1675. When he comes to enumerate at large the particulars in which our kings exercised this species of jurisdiction, he mentions as the 12th; "Bestowed bishoprics on such as they liked, and translated bishops from one see to another." p. 109. We close the whole finally with Hooker's observations on parochial pa tronage and presentations. " Now when the power (of orders) so received (from the bishop) is once to have any certain subject whereon it may work, and whereunto it is to be tied; here cometh in the people's consent, and not before. The power of order I may lawfully receive without any asking leave of any multitude ; but that power I cannot exercise upon any one certain people utterly against their wills ; neither is there in the church of England any man by order of law possessed with pastoral charge over any parish, but the people in effect do choose him there unto. For albeit they choose not by giving every man personally his particular voice, yet can they not say that they have their pastors violently obtruded upon them, inasmuch as their ancient and original interest therein hath been by orderly means derived into the patron, who chooseth for them. And if any man be desirous to know how patrons came to have such interest, we are to consider, that at the first erection of churches, it seemed but reasonable in the eyes of the whole Christian world to pass that right to them and their successors, on whose soil and at whose charge the same were founded. This all men gladly and willingly did, both in honour of so great piety, and AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 127 crown, and had given the king such assistances against the court of Rome as they ought to have done, they had prevented those things which the greatest partiality to one's country and ancestors will not suffer one to speak of in softer terms than as the blemish of the English name and nation, as well as of this unhappy prince's reign. For if the king gave away the rights of his crown, pope Inno cent led him to it by giving away his kingdom to Philip king of France ; and the barons followed the example in their turn, and gave away the kingdom to prince Lewis his son. Thus, in the compass of about four years, the kingdom of Eng land was three times given away ; a misfortune, if I mistake not, peculiar to this nation ; and which is worse, our ancestors helped to undo themselves, and had too great a share in the guilt that occasioned both the dishonour and the misery which fell upon their country. For though this wild doctrine of deposing kings and giving away countries had been broached by pope Gregory some time before, yet these nations had probably never felt the effects thereof, if the resentment and some sinister ends of the barons had not led them to give too much countenance to the imposture, when pope Innocent pretended to give away the kingdom to Philip king of France. But that wrong step being once made, it is no wonder if the rights of the subject fell and perished with those of the crown; for the texture and frame of every well-ordered government is so nice and delicate, and the rights of the prince and people are so riveted into one another, that, like wheels to the same machine, they never move right but in conjunction and under a well-proportioned balance. But whatever the cause was, it is certain, the effects were deplorable ; for they who agreed in nothing else, united in desolation and blood, and each side had its turn to lay waste the kingdom. Whilst the nation was thus groaning under the miseries of a bloody and unnatural war, God opened the way to a deliverance by the death of pope Innocent and king John, who died both within the compass of this year (1216) ; the first in July, the latter in October following : men so very different in their characters and for encouragement of many others unto the like, who peradventure else would have been as slow to erect churches or to endow them, as we are for ward both to spoil them, and to pull them down." B. vii. c. xiv. § 12. Vol. iii. p. 287. Keble's edit. 128 KING JOHN, THE BARONS, conduct, that it is not easy to determine whether pope Innocent did more towards raising the ecclesiastic monarchy, or king John towards lessening the monarchy of England. As for the former, such was his conduct and success, that he who will take the height of the papal grandeui-, must make his view in the reign of pope Innocent : for as the learned and judi cious M. Du Pin well observes, the popes have ever since taken their measures from the polity of his reign"; so he observes too, that the publishing the decretals, containing a body of laws suited to the present state ofthe papal monarchy, gave "the last blow towards the entire ruin of the ancient law, and the establishing the absolute and unlimited power ofthe popeV And though the collection and publication of those decretals be owing to pope Gregory the ninth, and not to Innocent ; yet it is evident that Gregory was immediate successor to Honorius the third, and came to the papacy within eleven or twelve years after the deatli of pope Innocent, and that the papacy made no considerable advance in that interval of time. Besides, he who looks to the decretals of pope Innocent, as they are for the most part published by Baluzius in the first volume of his Epistles, or as they are scattered in tho decretals of Gregory ; and considers how much of that work is taken from thence and from his Epistles ; will sec reason to affirm, not only that pope Innocent carried the papacy to its greatest height, but also that it was he who laid the foundation of that law, which (as M. Du Pin saith) gave the last hand ' to the papal usurpation. * Eccles. Hist. vol. xi. p. 11. b Eccles. Hist. Cent. xi. chap. x. p. 55. 1 The last hand.] Further on the introduction ofthe canon law into England, see Inett, vol. ii. p. 194 — 7. Of its character, history, &c. in general, of the extent to which it is binding in England, &c. the reader may consult bishop Stillingfleet's Ecclesiastical Cases, vol. i. 227—74, and vol. ii. 1—60; Gibson's Codex, vol. i. Preface, xxvii. — ix. ; Ridley's View of the Civil Law. The following account of the publication of the decretals, and of the other portions of which the huge volume of the Corpus Juris Canonici, &c. is composed, may perhaps be not unsatisfactory. " Justinian the emperor, about the year 533, did so contract the civil law, as he brought it from almost 2000 books into 50; besides some others, which he added of his own. Howbeit shortly after it grew out of use in Italy, by reason ofthe incursions of sundry barbarous nations, who, neglecting the imperial laws, did practise their own : till after almost 600 years, that Lotharius Saxo the emperor, about the year 1136, did revive again in that country, and in other places also, the ancient use and authority of it. AND POPE INNOCENT THE TIIIRD. 129 But so dark and unsearchable are the methods of the divine providence, that notwithstanding the great share which pope Inno- Whieh course of the emperour did not much content (as it seemeth) the bishops of Rome ; because it revived the memory of the ancient honour and dignity of the empire. Whereupon, very shortly after, Eugenius the third set Gratian in hand to compile a body of canon law, by contracting, into one book, the ancient constitutions ecclesiastical, and canons of councils ; that the state of the papacy might not, in that behalf, be inferiour to the empire. Which work the said Gratian performed, and published in the days of Stephen king of England, about the year 1151, terming the same 'concordia discordantium canonum,' a concord of disagreeing canons. Of whose great pains therein, so by him taken, a learned man saith thus : ' Gratianus ille jus pontificate dilaniavit, atque confudit :' that fellow Gratian did tear in pieces the pontifical law, and confound it ; the same being, in our libraries, sincere and perfect. But (this testimony, or any thing else to the contrary, that might truly be objected against that book notwithstanding) the author's chief purpose being to magnifie and extol the court of Rome, his said book got (we know not how) this glorious title, ' Decretum Aureum Divi Gratiani,' the Golden Decree of St. Gratian ; and he himself (as it appeareth) became, for the time, a saint for his pains. " Indeed he brake the ice to those that came after him, by devising the method, which since hath been pursued, for the enlarging and growth of the said body, by some of the popes themselves. Gregory the ninth, about the year 1236, and in the time of king Henry the third, after sundry draughts made by Innocentius the third, and others, of a second volume of the canon law, caused the same to be perused, enlarged, and by his authority to be published; and being divided into five books, it is intituled 'The Decretals of Gregory the Ninth.' Boniface the eighth, the great Augustus (as before we have shewed), commanded likewise another collection to be made of such constitutions and decrees, as had either been omitted by Gregory, or were made afterward by other succeeding bishops and councils ; and this collection is called * Sextus Liber Decretalium,' the Sixth Book of the Decretals ; and was set out to the world in the year 1298, in the reign of king Edward the first. Clement the fifth, in like manner, having bestowed great travel upon a fourth work, comprehending five books, died before he could finish it : but his successour, John the twenty-second, did, in the year 1317, and in the time of king Edward the second, make perfect, and publish the same work of Clement, and gave it the name of ' The Clementines.' Afterward, also, came out another volume, termed ' The Extravagants ;' because it did not only com prehend certain decrees of the said John the twenty-second, but likewise sundry other constitutions, made by other popes, both before and after him ; which flew abroad uncertainly in many men's hands, and were therefore swept up, and put together about the year 1478 into one bundle, called 'Extravagant Decretals,' which came to light ' post sextum,' after the sixth. By which title the compiler of this work would gladly (as it seemeth) have had it accounted the seventh book of the Decretals : but it never attaining that credit, the same, by Sixtus Quintus's assent, is attributed to a collection of VOL. i. K 130 KING JOHN. THE BARONS. cent had in that usurpation, with which God was pleased to punish the Christian church : notwithstanding the unspeakable miseries which his ambition had drawn upon the world, and the scenes of crueltv and the seeds of mischief which he had prepared for after- ages : God thought fit to let him oo down to the grave by the common course of nature. On the other hand, the death of king John, like the paths of the dead, is still in the dark, and will in all probability remain a subject of doubt till the revolution of the great day. Some of our writers say, that he was poisoned by a monk of Swinshead abbey in Lincolnshire ; whereas those of the Romish church pretend that this is all malice, and designed as a reproach on that order of men on whom it is laid, and have the confidence to tell the world, it is a fiction owing to the Reformation. But if it be a fiction, it is certainly older than the Reformation ; and if this be a made tale, it is not owing to the reformers, but ought to be laid at the door of those who ought to be ashamed of it. For if the monks of Swinshead had not the guilt of that prince's death, they suffered a wild bigotry so far to have prevailed over truth and rehgion, as to take the guilt thereof to themselves, by appointing and continuing priests to say mass for the monk, who was supposed to be the doer thereof: and thus they propagated their own infamy to succeeding ages. But whatever gave begin ning to this report, if it be omitted by M. Paris, the chronicles of Wikesa and Hemingford1*, written before the Reformation, relate at large all the circumstances of that story. Thus did this unfortunate prince end his life and his reign, and reproach and dishonour dwell for ever upon his memory. But though no eloquence is sufficient to brighten his character, or to excuse his conduct, especially that unworthy submission to the certain other constitutions made by Peter Matthew, of divers popes, from the time of Sixtus the fourth, who died in the year 14S4. To all these books mentioned, there have been lately added three great volumes of ' Decretal Epistles,' from St. Clement to Gregory the seventh's days ; also a huge heap of the ' Pope's Bulls,' from the said Gregory's time to Pius Quintus ; and lastly, no short summ of ' Papal Constitutions,' set forth a little before ihe said seventh book of the Decretals. — So as all these volumes being put together, they exceed as far the body of the civil laic, as the usurped dignitv of the papacy exceedeth the mean estate of the empire." Bishop Overall's Convocation Book, of A.D. 1606. p. 320 — 2. A.D. 1690. 4to, - Chron. "Wikes, Col. Gal. vol. ii. p. 3S. b Chron. Hemingf. CoL Gal. vol. ii. p. 559. AND POPE INNOCENT THE THIRD. 131 papal tyranny, which will remain the eternal and indelible blemish of his reign ; yet it must be owned, that the stand which he made against the court of Rome in the defence of the monarchy, was bold and generous, and such as deserved a better issue : and one may be allowed to say, that even his fatal miscarriage was chiefly owing to the bigotry of the English nation, and to the unhappy circumstances wherein he received the crown. And it is very hard to blame a prince for not maintaining the dignity of a crown, which descends to him in chains and fetters ; or that he only should bear the dishonour which falls upon his country, when his people will not suffer him to defend it ; and much more when they take part with the enemy, and choose to be instruments in their own undoing ; — and this was but too much the case at this time. Besides, it should not be forgotten, that the last part of this prince's life was spent in the defence of the royal line of England ; and all circumstances considered, it seems probable, that he owed his death to the same cause. And if the conduct of this prince in these instances be not enough to atone for his past miscarriages, they will at least deserve to be remembered by all that love their country and the monarchy, that have the least taste of liberty, or that have any sense of those miseries which the papal tyranny let in upon the church and kingdom. However, the revolutions under this prince are very dishonour able to the English nation, and such as naturally lead one to a frightful idea of the reign under which they happened : and they who do not carefully attend to the springs by which these great turns were set into motion, are very apt to resolve them into the ill conduct of king John, rather than into those mischievous prin ciples and the wicked artifices of that court which attempted to enslave all Christendom under pretences of religion, and into the great steps which they had made towards it in England before this prince came to the crown. I shall now ask the reader's leave to repeat some things which I have observed before, and shall put an end to this work, with giving him a short view of the ancient and the present state ofthe English church and monarchy, and of the springs and causes, as well as of the effects and consequences of those changes, which make up the subject of the present history. INTRODUCTION. PAPAL USURPATIONS IN CHURCH AND STATE; ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF.— GENERAL RECAPITULATION1. The Britons had been converted in all probability before Christ ianity was settled in Rome, and the British church continued on the same foot on which it was originally founded, till the conquest by the English. And though that revolution forced the British people into a narrower compass, and put the English-Saxons in possession of the greatest and best parts of their country, yet a Christian church was still preserved together with the remains of the British nation. And this church was as free and independent * as the people ; who were so far from being influenced with the after-conversions of some of the English by the missionaries from Rome, that the rites which they received from thence set them at a greater distance from the English, added a new article of controversy, and made the breach wider. Their metropolitans never received a pall from Rome ; their bishops were chosen and consecrated, and all ecclesiastical affairs determined finally within themselves, and their clergy generally married. In short, there is no mark of any dependence ofthe British church on that of Rome, nor any proof of a settled intercourse or communion betwixt them to be found, till the conquest of Wales by king Henry the first united the British to the English church, and did thereby expose it to the hard fate of that church, to which it was united. The case of the English was different from that of the Britons. Some of them had received their conversion from Rome, and 1 General recapitulation.] From Inett's Origines Anglicana, vol. ii. p. 488 — 503. 2 Free and independent.] See above, p. 4—6; 18, 19, and note. PAPAL USURPATIONS IN CHURCH AND STATE. 133 they who had been originally converted by the Scots from Ireland, had for some ages before the Norman revolution held communion with the church of Rome. And the better to pre serve a friendship and give proof of the communion betwixt the English and the Roman church, the Enghsh archbishops did frequently go to Rome and receive palls1 from thence, and a great deference was ever paid to the bishops thereof. But whilst the English church thus maintained a communion with that of Rome, the authority and government thereof were continued on the same foot, on which the canons of the universal church had originally placed national churches. The English metropolitans convened and presided in their provincial councils, and their authority therein was final, unless in such cases wherein appeals to the king were allowed : but as no canon of the English church before the conquest ever allowed any appeal to the bishops of Rome, the histories thereof afford no instance of a practice of that kind. The English bishops had their proper diocesan synods, and all the clergy and religious as well as the laity within their several dioceses were the subjects of their care. If there were any exemptions from their authority, they were owing to the secular power ; and these, if I mistake not, never extended further than exempting some of the religious from the charges of receiving and providing for them in their visitations, rather than dis charging their persons from the authority of their diocesans. The bishops of England were nominated to those trusts by our kings, confirmed and consecrated by their proper metro politans, subjected to no canons but such as were either received or formed with their own suffrage and consent. They convened and presided in their proper diocesan synods, and their authority therein was final, except in such cases wherein appeals lay to the courts of the archbishop of the province, or of the king. The case of the lower clergy was much the same with that of the bishops. They were subject to no ecclesiastic authority but that of their proper ordinaries : the canons were the measures of their duty, and the laws of their country the standard of their secular rights and of their subjection to the civil power. 1 Receive palls.] Seelnett, vol. ii. p. 17 — 20 ; Twisden's Vindication, p. 41 — 7 (a very elaborate discussion) ; and Sahnasius's learned edition of Tertullian's Treatise De Pallio, Lug. Bat. 1656. 134 PAPAL USURPATIONS IN CHURCH AND STATE; The revenues of the church were subject only to the same laws and to the same authority by which the clergy and religious were governed: but as they were originally derived from the bounty of the kings of England, or the charity and munificence of the English nation, they were also subject to the laws of their country, and in cases of necessity contributed to the support thereof. In short, there is not any canon, any law, or any standing allowed practice to be found, which carries the least mark of any vassalage or subjection to a foreign power ; but by all that appears, the English church had preserved and was in full possession of a free, entire, and independent authority, at the time of the Norman revolution : in other words, the English church was as absolute, free, and independent on any foreign ecclesiastic power, as the monarchy and nation were on any secular authority. But if we look a little forward, the English church has another face, and appears so unlike itself, that one can hardly say whether the change was more surprising, or the effects thereof more pitiable and to be lamented. William the first, to serve the Norman interest, called in the papal power, and made use of the legates of pope Alexander to cover his violence to the English bishops : but when he had served his purpose, he laid by his tools, and left the church and the monarchy in the same state wherein he found them, the change which the Norman revolution produced only excepted. Such too was the state of the church during the reign of William the second : but the struggle for the patronage of the church, or the dispute about the right of investitures : which began in his reign, was, by the address of the court of Rome, gained from his successor king Henry the first, and unhappily surrendered by that prince in the year one thousand one hundred and seven. This was the first shock to the authority of the English church, and which opened the way to all the ensuing usurpations. For by yielding up to the bishops of Rome a power to put the arch bishops and bishops of England into the possession of their bishoprics, they were made judges of their sufficiency and per sonal abilities : and thus the bishops of England, who had never been subjected to any authority but that of their metropolitans 1 Of investitures.] See above, p. 33, and n. or Index, under Bishops, their investiture. PROGRESS OF.— GENERAL RECAPITULATION. 135 and the government under which they lived, and our metropolitans who had had no superiors but the kings of England, were involved in the same common fate, and by that one unhappy concession were made subjects to a foreign power. And the bishops of Rome having thus thrust out the kings of England, easily advanced themselves to the reputation of being the supreme ordinaries, and having first prepared their way by desiring assistance from the clergy, in the reigns of king Stephen, Henry the second, and king Richard, under the colour of the Holy War ; in the succeeding reign of king John, pope Innocent did by his own authority lay several impositions on the clergy and religious, and in time the bishops of Rome pretended to the sole right to lay taxes ' upon the clergy and religious, and actually laid the heaviest impositions upon them ; and this, too, not to serve the purposes of religion, but to carry on their wars against the emperors and other Chris tian princes, to oblige them to become their tributaries and vassals, to enlarge their own dominions and secular power, to reduce the Greek church to their obedience by force of arms, to extirpate and give away the countries of all those who opposed their usurpa tion, and who were for that reason called heretics. In short, they made use of the power which they gained over the revenues of the English church, to serve all the purposes of ambition, wantonness, and folly. But to set this particular in a just light, I must ask the reader's leave to look a little forward to the next reign, that of Henry the third, where the aforesaid concession was carried so far before the death of that prince, that the court of Rome at one time demanded, that benefices should be provided for three hundred Italians a ; at another time, that two prebends in each cathedral church, and the provision for two monks in every monastery, should be annexed to the papacy b. They disposed and made void at pleasure the bishoprics and ecclesiastical promotions of England, overturned all the rights of patronage and elections, and gave so many preferments to Italians 2, that in the letter of the nobility 1 To lay taxes.] For an elaborate enquiry into the origin and progress of the papal pecuniary exactions from the clergy of England, see Twisden's Historical Vindication of the Church of England, p. 74 — 92. See also Inett, vol. ii. p. 383—7. ¦ Matth. Paris, ann. 1240. p. 532. n. 40. b Ejusd. ann. 1226. p. 328. n. 10. 2 Preferments to Italians.] See index, under Benefices in the hands of Foreigners. See also Twisden's Historical Vindication, p. 60—2. 136 PAPAL USURPATIONS IN CHURCH AND STATE; and commons of England to pope Innocent the fourth, about the year 1 245, they tell that prelate, that " the number of Italians preferred in England was infinite," and that " the money carried to them amounted to threescore thousand marks " ; a sum," as they further add, " greater than the revenues of the crown ; " and all this, besides the vast sums which by Peter-pence 1 and tenths, and many other ways, were extorted from the English nation. The success of the court of Rome in the controversy about the right of investitures, by which they gained this mighty influence over the persons of the English bishops and the revenues of the church, gave fire to their ambition to break the power, and to possess themselves of the authority by which it had been governed ; and this was done by advancing the power of their own legates. The English church was at first settled on the institution of Christ and the canons of the catholic church, and thus continued to be governed from the foundation thereof till the beginning of the eleventh century ; and this with so little interruption, that there is not so much as one English canon which allows the least authority to the bishops of Rome or their legates, nor so much as any instance of any authority exercised by them, or of any legates called into England in the space of above four hundred years, but when king Offa called over legates to give a colour to the violence which he had first offered to the province of Canterbury, and William the first invited in the legates of pope Alexander to serve the ends of the Norman revolution. On the contrary, whilst the canons and history of the English church are thus silent, the laws of England considered the legates or ambassadors of the bishops of Rome, no otherwise than the law of nations considers those of all other foreign princes ; and did not allow them so much as to enter England but when called for and invited, or at least had the permission and leave of the kings thereof. In this posture this affair was continued till the latter end of the eleventh century, when pope Gregory the seventh formed the design to erect the papal monarchy on the spoils of the civil power, and the ruins of that government which Christ and his apostles had first erected, and which for a thousand years had prevailed through the whole Christian church. a Matth. Paris, ann. 1245. p. 667. 1 By Peter-pence.] See Index, under Peter-pence. See also Twisden's Historical Vindication, p. 74 — 8. PROGRESS OF — GENERAL RECAPITULATION. 137 In pursuance of this design, the court of Rome applied itself to break the authority of national churches, by usurping a power to themselves to convene and preside in synods and councils by their legates : but as this was a direct violence to the authority of Christ, and to the canons and usages ofthe whole Christian church, it was a great while before the western churches were brought to submit to it. From the pontificate of Gregory the seventh, many attempts were made upon the English church. King William the first, who was contemporary with that prelate, saw his designs and kept him at a distance. And thus things continued during the succeeding reign of William the second. The court of Rome renewed their efforts with greater vigour under Henry the first ; but though they gained their point as to the dispute about investitures, yet king Henry suffered not their legates to come into England ; and if they did, it was no other wise than as the envoys of a foreign prince, till about the twenty- fifth year of his reign, when that prince permitted a papal legate to preside in the council of London. But as this usurpation was very evident, it was so resented by the whole nation, that this matter proceeded no further till the year following, when William de Corboil, then archbishop of Canterbury, by the address of that court, was prevailed upon to accept the character of legate to the bishop of Rome. And by this fatal oversight the regular autho rity of that prelate made way for the usurpation, which the court of Rome had been labouring to introduce ; for the legatine power being thus let in, was so strengthened by the confusions of the succeeding reign of king Stephen, and by the advantages which the court of Rome gained under Henry the second, that the right of the English church and nation was yielded up \ and 1 Was yielded up.] The history and progress of this usurpation is learnedly illustrated by Sir Roger Twisden in his Vindication ; see p. 14 — 16. 18 — 28. 38—41. The following shorter extracts are given from that work, because they comprise the principal points. They supply also an apt illustration of the progressive expedients to which the popes were in the habit of resorting, according to the exigencies of a case, and of the appropriate mischiefs which regularly ensued. " Of these and the like cases, exercised without scruple in the church of England, and no control from Rome, it would not be easy to dispossess the archbishop of Canterbury by strong hand ; the way, therefore, of making him the pope's legate was invented, by which those particulars he did before with out interruption of his own right, he, whom it was not easy to bar of doing 138 PAPAL USURPATIONS IN CHURCH AND STATE; that usurpation allowed and settled by the agreement betwixt that prince and the court of Rome in the year 1172, in that general article l by which the king surrendered all customs prejudicial to the liberties of the church ; that is, in other words, every thing that stood in the way of the papal usurpation. The authority and government of the national church being thus overwhelmed arid torn to pieces, and the rights of our metro politans made a sacrifice to the ambition and designs of the court of Rome, the way lay open to the third step 2 made by that court ; and this was to render useless the authority of our diocesan bishops, at least to put it out of their power to give a stop to the designs formed at Rome. This work was done already in some measure, by subjecting them to the legatine power ; for thus they were bound to attend synods which were not convened by their proper metropolitans, and forced to yield obedience to canons which had never passed with their own consent and suffrage, and were called out of their provinces to be judged : in short, the most ancient and distinguishing rights of our diocesan bishops sank with and were buried under the ruins of the metropolitical power. But to prostrate them still lower, and render them as little and contemptible in the face of their people and their clergy, and in them, might be said to act as the pope's agent." — Twisden, p. 26. This was about the year 1126. " In the year 1 144, the bishop of Winchester was dismissed from his lega tine commission ; and the pope, finding with how great difficulty the eccle siastic affairs of this kingdom could be managed by any legate without the archbishop of Canterbury, thought of a very subtle invention to conserve his own authority, and not have any crossing with that prelate ; which was, to create him and his successors legati nati ; by which, such things as he did before, and had a face of interfering with the papal plenitude, and were not so easy to divest the archbishop of exercising, he might be said to do by a lega tine power Certain it is, hereby the papal authority was not a little in creased ; there being none of the clergy now to question any thing that came from Rome, the archbishop, on whom the rest depended, himself operating but as a delegate from thence." Ibid. p. 38, 9. Lastly, " The popes having gained an entrance, found means to reduce the grant of legatus natus to no more than stood with their own liking : by invent ing a new sort of legate, styled legatus a latere, by reason of his near depend ence on the pope's person, who being employed in matters of concernment, at his being here the power of the former slept." Ibid. p. 40. On the general history of this question, compare also Inett, vol. ii. 187, 8. 190—3. 194, 5. 1 That general article.] See above, p. 55. 2 The third step.] See above, p. 36 — 45. 54—8. PROGRESS OF.— GENERAL RECAPITULATION. 139 their own consistories, as they were in the councils and synods, great numbers of the religious were exempted from their jurisdic tions ; and by gaining to themselves a power to receive causes by appeals from the concession of Henry the second, the court of Rome put it into every one's power who had a will to contend, to affront and insult their bishops, and to render useless the little remains of the episcopal authority, which had escaped the common deluge that swept away all the rest. The change in the state and circumstances of the lower clergy betwixt the Norman conquest and the death of king John, was answerable to that of their superiors. Their persons were taken from the protection of the civil power, discharged from the laws of their country, and subjected to a foreign power, and to canons that denied the liberty which God and his gospel, which nature and the ancient English church had ever allowed them. A great part of the provision which the charity of the English nation had made for them was by appropriations of benefices, and the exemptions of some new orders of the religious from payment of tithes, snatched out of their hands ; and that which was left to them, was laid open to the rapine and oppressions of men whose greediness had no bounds. Their titles were made litigious, and the remedy which their predecessors had ever found at their own doors, became, by being carried to Rome by appeals, a grievous and in supportable burthen : and which is sadder still, the same causes which brought all these mischiefs upon the clergy, put it out of the power of their rightful governors to protect or to support, and much more to deliver them from the oppression. The religious of England were the only persons who seemed to reap any advantage from that usurpation, which was attended with so many mischiefs to the church and nation ; for in the com pass of about one hundred and fifty years, they saw more new orders erected, and made greater accessions 1 to their wealth and to their numbers, and to what they for a time called privileges, than all the preceding ages had ever produced ; and yet, to look no further, the same period of time in which they were thus increased and enriched, and even whilst they valued themselves as the darlings and peculiar favourites of the court of Rome, they had the mortification to see themselves the subjects of that tyranny which they had helped to advance, and had more impo- 1 Greater accessions.] Of the origin, progress, rapid increase of the numbers of the monasteries and regular clergy, the nature of their rule, &c. fee- see Inett, vol ii. 207—12. 218 — 22. 140 PAPAL USURPATIONS IN CHURCH AND STATE; sitions and heavier burdens laid upon their estates, and greater violences offered to their just rights, than all their predecessors had ever felt under their lawful superiors. And in the examples of the two brothers, Stephen and Simon Langton, and in the treatment which they received from pope Innocent the third, under the reign of king John, cathedral and conventual churches were made sensible, that the freedom of elections, and the exemptions from the authority of their kings and bishops, for which they had been taught to contend, were nothing else but artifices of the court of Rome, designed to separate them from the interests of the crown and the national church, and at once to bind oppression and sorrow about their heads, and to put it out of the power of their rightful superiors to relieve or help them. Such was the state of the English church at the death of king John in the year 1216, and the changes in the church which a little time produced. In short, the English church, which had continued free and independent from the foundations thereof till after the Norman revolution, was in the compass of one hundred and fifty years last past, captivated, enslaved, and subjugated to a foreign power. And in this miserable state I must leave it, to stop the reader with that which will render the fate of the church still more melancholy and surprising ; and that is, some reflections on the ancient and present state of the English monarchy *. The dark steps by which our constitution grew up to that state in which it now appears, the ancient forms of the legislature, or of the administration of civil justice, come not into the compass of my present enquiry ; but the interest which the civil government had in the affairs of the church and religion, the ancient and un doubted rights of the kings of England, and the outrages offered to their authority by the papal usurpations, what the power was which they once possessed and what they lost ; or, in other words, the ancient and present state of the English monarchy with respect to ecclesiastical affairs, are the subject now before us. Our histories and our laws put it beyond all doubt, that the church, the clergy, and the religious of England, had a great share in the cares of the ancient English government. The kings of England convened national councils and synods, presided in them, and, with the advice of their bishops and nobility, made laws for the good government of all orders and ranks of their people, and punished every disobedience. And as they were ever reputed the fountain of power and law, so their courts were the last resort of 1 The English monarchy.] Compare above, p. 59 — 7Q. PROGRESS OF.— GENERAL RECAPITULATION. 141 justice, and causes as well ecclesiastical as civil were, as occasion required, carried thither by appeals, and finally determined there. The kings of England had founded and endowed the bishoprics, and for the most part the cathedrals and greater monasteries, and from the foundation of the English church had not only nominated their bishops, but as supreme ordinaries they had ever put them in possession of their bishoprics, by the ceremony well known by the name of investiture, the delivery of a staff and a ring, and in return had ever received their fealty and homage. And as they endowed the church, they did also with the advice of their great council lay impositions on the revenues thereof, when the necessities of the state called for help. In short, the kings of England were free, independent, sovereign princes, and next under God supreme governors in all their dominions, and in all causes, and over all persons, as well ecclesiastical as civil. Such was the state of the monarchy at the time of the Norman conquest. From this prospect of the English monarchy, I must turn and lead the reader to a more melancholy reflection, and offer to his view the mighty changes which a little time produced. William the first being seated on the throne of England, pope Gregory the seventh, about the twelfth year of that prince's reign, advanced a pretence that England was a fee of the papacy : but as this pretence was all vapour and imagination, groundless and impudent beyond example, so it signified nothing but to lay open the designs which that haughty prelate had lately formed, and to give the king a just occasion to treat him with contempt, and not to suffer the court of Rome to intermeddle either in the affairs of church or state. — And thus things continued during the reign of his successor, king William the second. But the attempt which miscarried in these two reigns proved more successful in that of Henry the first; for the surrender which he made of his right to investitures did at once take away the patronage of the kings of England, together with one of the greatest branches of the supremacy, and by subjecting the bishops and the revenues of the church to a foreign power, gave such a shock to the monarchy of England, that it is very hard to deter mine whether the church or the nation suffered most by it. The legatine power was no less fatal to the kings of England than to the authority of our metropolitans and to the national church : and this too was one of the blemishes of the same prince's 142 PAPAL USURPATIONS IN CHURCH AND STATE; reign : for this prince, who despised and rejected, and for more than twenty years kept this usurpation at a distance, did at last give way to it ; and the confusions of the succeeding reign, that of king Stephen, so strengthened and improved it, that it was challenged as a right of the papacy, and finally owned as such by king Henry the second in the unhappy agreement betwixt that prince and the court of Rome, which ensued upon the death of archbishop Becket. Thus a power of convening national synods, which had ever been esteemed the sole right of the kings of England, was divided betwixt them and the bishops of Rome ; and a way was thereby opened to a sort of legislature, or a power of making canons, which in time put a restraint upon our kings and their great councils, and in many instances rendered useless, and even insulted and affronted their legislative power. The gaining a power to receive ecclesiastical causes by appeals was still more fatal to the authority of the crown ; for by carrying to Rome the last resort in causes ecclesiastical, a great branch of the supremacy, which all the by-past ages had thought sacred and inalienable, was torn from the kings of England ; and yet these errors in politics, which threatened the very being of the monarchy, grew up together, and were the blemishes of the same reigns. H. Huntingdon, who lived at that time, as well as Gervasius, says, the use of appeals was begun by Henry bishop of Winchester, and brother to king Stephen : and the instances of that kind are too many under the government of that prince. But as these were then esteemed no otherwise than as encroachments on the rights of the crown, so in the recognition of the ecclesiastical laws in the council of Clarendon, the last resort in causes ecclesiastical was declared the sole right of the crown : and thus it continued till the year 1 1 72, when the same prince who had declared and asserted the rights of the crown in the council of Clarendon, did very unworthily give them away, and in his agreement with pope Alexander consented that appeals should freely be made to the bishops of Rome. Nor was this the only blemish of that prince's reign, but he stands accountable to posterity for a breach of trust of much greater importance to the monarchy; and this was, the exemption of the clergy and religious from the secular power. This pretence was first set on foot in the preceding reign, that of king Stephen, and some steps were made towards it. However, his successor king Henry the second put a stop to it, and resumed the rights PROGRESS OF.— GENERAL RECAPITULATION. 143 of the crown, and by his judges punished a great many of the clergy, who but too well deserved it. And when that court, which was restless and impatient to advance themselves to the head of the English clergy, had flattered and deceived some of them into their interest, and this pretence was revived again; the king, with the nobility and the whole body of the bishops, Becket only excepted, opposed it with such a resolution and unanimity and weight of reason, as were every way answerable to the consequence of that affair. Yet, after all, the same thing which was thought of the last importance, and asserted accordingly in the beginning of king Henry the second's reign, was yielded up and given away by that prince before his reign was done ; for in the agreement between the king and the legate of the bishop of Rome in the year 1176, it was agreed1, that the clergy and religious should not be carried before any secular judge for any crime whatsoever, unless for abuses of the king's forests, or for such services as they were obliged to by their particular tenure. The kings of England were thus stripped of their supremacy over ecclesiastical persons, as they were about the same time of the last resort in causes ecclesiastical ; and the sovereignty of the English monarchs, which before extended to all persons and to all causes, was by these concessions limited and restrained to secular persons and affairs. Thus the bishops of Rome were placed at the head of the church and the clergy of England, and the numbers and the wealth of the clergy and religious, together with the influence which they had upon the nation, being considered, it will not be easy to determine, whether the kings of England or the bishops of Rome had the greater share in the government, when king John came to the crown. To render these mischiefs incurable, the same men and the very same methods which raised the bishops of Rome to a power over ecclesiastical persons and causes, raised them also to a sort of sovereignty over the wealth and revenues of the English church, and put them in a condition to support the authority which they had first usurped, and to perpetuate their tyranny over the church at the charge of the nation. For the revenues of the church, instead of contributing to the necessities of the government, were made a fund, which in time served all the purposes of those who had first ravished and despoiled the monarchy ; and the charity and munificence of the preceding kings of England were made use 1 It was agreed.] See above, p. 59. 144 PAPAL USURPATIONS IN CHURCH AND STATE; of to break the measures and to control the power of their suc cessors ; to weaken their hands ; to intimidate their people ; to put it out of their power to protect their good subjects from rapine and oppression ; or to force the disobedient to then- duty : in short, to insult then- authority, to render them little and con temptible, and to frustrate all the ends of government. And the mischievous effects of these changes, owing to the two preceding reigns, appeared so soon, that king Richard, the immediate suc cessor to Henry the second, exceedingly lamented the state of the monarchy, and with the utmost mortification pronounced himself the shadow of akinga. And he had but too much ground for that melancholy reflection ; for the patronage of the crown was lost with the right of investitures; the power to convene national synods swallowed up by that of the papal legates; the supremacy in causes ecclesiastical was carried to Rome, by the concession which yielded up the right to appeals ; the authority over the persons and the estates of the clergy and religious was given away, by that grant which discharged the clergy from the secular power ; and the clergy was thereby rendered a body separate and inde pendent upon the state, their interests distinguished and set at such a distance from one another, that the privileges and liberties of the church were numbered from the spoils of the civil govern ment, and then only thought bright and shining, when they cast a shade upon the monarchy. The crown of England was thus robbed of a great part of its wealth, its subjects, and its power, when it fell into the hands of king John; so that in truth there remained nothing more to con summate the dishonour of the kings of England, but to shift names, and give up their title in exchange for that of vassals. And there could be nothing more to engage the wishes, or to de serve the ambition of those prelates who had already possessed themselves of the wealth and power of the clergy and religious, and of the supremacy in causes ecclesiastical, but to assume the title and the name of kings of England, and to take to themselves the remains of the royal power, which they had fettered and chained, and in many cases rendered incapable of serving the great ends of government. And the issue was such as might be ex pected : the court of Rome finished the usurpation which they had been labouring for in the preceding reigns, by forcing king John to resign his kingdoms, and to receive them again as a fee ¦ Gervas. Chron. ann. 1196. [Decern Script, col. 1595.] PROGRESS OF.— GENERAL RECAPITULATION. 145 of the papacy, and of a free sovereign prince to take upon himself the title of a feudatory or a vassal to the bishop of Rome : and he did his homage accordingly, and consented to pay a yearly tribute for his own kingdoms. And lest the world should ever be induced to believe, that all this was owing to the personal failings of king John, his innocent son king Henry the third was forced to tread in the steps of his father, and to take his kingdoms, as he had done before him, as a fee of the papacy ; and he swore fealty and did homage accordingly to the bishop of Rome. Such mighty changes did the compass of about one hundred and fifty years produce in these nations ; and although some brave efforts were made by our succeeding kings to regain the rights and liberties of the church and of the crown ; and the statutes of Mortmain ', Provisors, and Praemunire, the remonstrances of our parliaments and synods, the struggles of some of our bishops and clergy, and the outcries of the whole nation against the tyranny and oppressions of the court of Rome, show us what sense our ancestors had of the papal usurpation, and put it beyond a doubt, that the use which was made thereof was every way answerable to the wicked practices by which it at first had been gained, and that our forefathers groaned under the yoke, and passionately desired to be delivered from it. Yet all was in vain, and without the prospect of a remedy ; for God, who in His just displeasure had given up these nations to that infatuation and blindness which had brought all those mischiefs upon them, suffered our ancestors to languish under the miseries which they had drawn down upon themselves, and never entirely delivered them from the yoke of bondage, till in His great mercy he had opened their eyes, and by 1 The statutes of Mortmain, fee] See Kennett on Impropriations, p. 25 (Mortmain, Remonstrances, fee); Twisden's Vindication, 62—4 (Provisors, fee); 1 Fox's Acts, 548. edit. 1641 (Praemunire). See also Blackstone's Com mentaries, bk. i. c. 18 (Mortmain), and bk. ii. c. 18. § 2 (ditto); also bk. iv. c. 8 (Praemunire). In the statutes of Provisors (25 Edw. III. c. vi., 27 Edw. III. c. i. § 1. and 38 Edw. III. c. i. § 4, and c. ii. § 1—4) it is enacted that the bishop of Rome shall not present or collate to any bishopric or ecclesiastical benefice in England; and that whoever disturbs any patron in the presentation to a living, by virtue of a papal provision, such provisor shall pay fine and ransom to the king at his will; and be imprisoned till he renounces such provision*. And the same punishment is enacted against such as cite the king, or any of his subjects, to answer in the court of Rome.— Blackstone's Commentaries, book iv. c. 8. VOL. I. L 146 PAPAL USURPATIONS IN CHURCH AND STATE. the reformation of religion had first made them sensible of the imposture which had thus fatally ensnared and betrayed them. Thus did the all-wise providence of God unite the monarchy, the nation, the church and the religion of England, in the same suffer ings and deliverance. They went hand in hand into vassalage. The same men and the very same arts which despoiled the monarchy, enslaved our country, corrupted our religion, and usurped the rights of the English church ; and the same Reforma tion which restored our religion to its ancient purity, restored the rights of the church and of the monarchy, and resettled the liberties of the English nation. These methods of the Divine providence seemed designed on purpose to endear our church and our country and the monarchy to each other, and to show us plainly that their interests are inseparable, and can never be safe but in conjunction ; whilst at the same time they teach us by sad experience, that Popery is the common enemy to every thing that is, or that ought to be, dear to the Princes and to the People of England. I have suffered myself to be led into this long and melancholy digression, that I might at once offer to the reader's view, the ancient and present state of the church and monarchy, together with the steps by which the changes were advanced, and the intolerable mischiefs which from thence ensued : — and having done this, I shall leave the reader to adore the goodness which so happily delivered the Church and the Nation, and which has hitherto preserved us from the snare ; and conclude with beseeching God, that we may be afl duly sensible of the mercies which we now enjoy under the best of churches and the best of governments, and know no more of those miseries which attended the papal usurpation, but from our by-past story. INTRODUCTION. DOCTRINAL CORRUPTIONS OF POPERY1. We are now arrived at a full and adequate interpretation of our text 2. For we are not, as oi jroXAol the many, the major part of the world ; KairriktvovTeg, which adulterate and negotiate the word of God for our own lucre and advantage ; but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ. And hereby we have made the nearer advances to a clear view and just character of popery : we will allow them to be the ol ttoAAoi, the most of Christians ; nor at present will contend with them about their boasted titles of cathohc and universal : for it was never yet so well with mankind, that the major part was the better. And then for the other mark KonrrikevovTSG, I shall now trace and expose their corruptions and cauponations of the gospel : that they are true Xpia-tfiTropoi, real Xpioroica- 7r»)Xot ; have perverted and abused the divine institution to the base ends of worldly profit and power ; have consociated Jesus with Belial, Christianity with Atheism : every part of their system, which our pious reformers renounced and exploded, being founded upon mere politic ; built up and supported by the known methods of subtlety and force. And yet I would not be thought to charge every single member of that communion with this heavy imputation. I question not, but great numbers think and act in godly sincerity : every age 1 Of popery.] From " A Sermon upon Popery, preached before the Uni versity of Cambridge, Nov. 5, 1715, by Richard Bentley, D.D., Master of Trinity College, and Chaplain to His Majesty. 1715." 8vo. p. 9—28. 2 Our text.] 2 Cor. ii. 17. l 2 148 DOCTRINAL CORRUPTIONS has produced among them some shining examples of piety and sanctity. We do not now consider individuals, but the collective body of popery ; not private lives and secret opinions, but the public avowed doctrines, and the general practice of the managers. There was one pious family even in Sodom, and without doubt many wicked ones even in Jerusalem. Not every single person within the limits of the reformation is as good, as his profession requires ; nor every papist as bad, as the popish system permits. And now, ri ttqutov, ti §' iirura ; What can I better begin with, than what our text suggests ; their enhancing the authority of the vulgar Latin above the Greek original ? so that we must search for St. Paul's meaning here, not in the notion of ica-rn- Xivovrsg, but of adulterantes ; not of oi tto\Xo\, but of multi with out its article ; an original defect in the Latin tongue. Now can any thing be more absurd, more shocking to common sense, than that the stream should rise above the fountain ? That a verbal translation, which, were the author of it inspired, must yet from the very nature of language have several defects and ambiguities ; that such a translation, I say, by a private unknown person not pretending to inspiration, should be raised and advanced above the inspired Greek ? Is it possible, those that enacted this, could believe it themselves ? Nor could they suggest, that the first Greek exemplar had been more injured by the transcribers and notaries, than that of their version. More ancient manuscripts were preserved of this, than they could show for the Latin. There were more, and more learned commentators to guard it : no age of the eastern empire without eminent scholars ; while the west lay sunk many centuries under ignorance and barbarity. And yet in defiance of all this, the Latin is to be the umpire and standard ; and the apostles to speak more authentically in that conveyance, than in their own words. Nay, a particular edition shall be legitimated and consecrated, with condemnation of all various readings ; and two popes, with equal pretence to infal libility, shall each sanctify a different copy with ten thousand variations . These things are unaccountable, in the way of sincerity : but if you view them on the foot of politic, as an acquist of power, authority, and pre-eminence ; — the council of Trent knew then what they did. But though this itself is but a translation, yet no secondary translation must be made from it for the instruction of the people. They must hear the public liturgies in a language unknown to OF POPERY. 149 them ; and jabber their credos and pater-nosters at home with out understanding *. But was not this Latin version at first 1 Without understanding.] " It is a thing plainly repugnant to the word of God, and the custom of the primitive church, to have public prayer in the church, or to minister the sacraments in a tongue not understanded of the people." Art. xxiv. of the Church of England. " Amalarius, in the begynnge of his seconde booke De Ordine Romana Ecclesiee, doth shewe the cause why of olde tyme emonges the Romanes the lessons were reade in Greke and also in Latine, as it is at this day used," saith he, " at Constantinople : for two causes. One, for that there were present Grecians, to whom was unknowen the Latine tongue, and also for that the Romanes were present, to whom was unknowen the Greke tongue. Another cause was to expresse the unitie of both nations. So that the sayde Amalarius may be witnesse, that in the olde tyme the lessons of the Scriptures were so reade in the churche, as by the readyng the people myght understande to their edification." Archbishop Parker, in the anonymous Defence of Priests' Marriages, p. 337. But let us hear what could be said in defence of the service in an unknown tongue ; and how it is argued, that it comes to be better not to understand the divine service. " Manye," says Christopherson, one of the most learned and most respect able of the Romish party, in his Exhortation against Rebellion, in the reign of queen Mary, A.D. 1554, "grudge and are offended, that the masse, and all other divine service, is in Latyn, so that when they be in the church, they do not understande what the priest sayeth. I woulde gladly aske one question of such, why they come to the church ; whether to heare or to pray ? They will answer, I doubte not, to do bothe. For there they both learne theyr duetye by hearyng of sermons, and also practise it by diligente and fervente praying. Nowe then seeinge that to do our duetie is much better then to learne our duetie, because that every manne learneth to this end that he may practise, although both twayne be good and neeessarye, yet the one farre passeth the other. And the one maye be gotten in shorte space with small travayle, but the other asketh longe tyme, and much payne to get it. As concerninge which purpose we reade a notable storye of one Pambo." The notable story into which the good bishop diverges, we will leave, as less likely to bring conviction to our readers, even than his reasons, to which he thus returns : "Wherefore I have oftentymes much marvayled at us Englishe- men of late, that we came to the church, at the tyme of our Englishe service, to heare only, and not to pray ourselfes. By meanes whereof many folkes are so inured, that they can hardlye frame them selfes as yet to praye in the churche, which, as our Saviour sayth, is the house of prayer. And moste mete were it for folkes coming to the churche, to pray earnestly them selfes, and both to thinke upon theyr synnes, wherewith they have offended their Lorde God, and to be sory for them ; yea, and beside to gyve hym harty thankes for all his benefites bestowed upon them, and to beseche hym to assiste them with hys grace agaynst the assaultes of their adversary the devil. For thus ought men to spende the holy daye, and thus ought they to bestow 150 DOCTRINAL CORRUPTIONS the common language of the country ? Was it not first made, and received into public use, because the Greek was unknown there ? If a Christian congregation may be duly edified, may pay acceptable devotions in a language unknown; the Greek original might have reigned alone and universal, and its Latin rival had never existed, — Why then is popery so cruel and importune, to withhold this common blessing ? to continue the public worship in Latin, after it has ceased to be a living language, against the very reason that first introduced Latin? — Seek not a good account for this in Scripture, not even in the Latin Bible : but seek it in the vile arts of politic, and the principles of atheism. Their authority was secured by it over an ignorant populace ; it gave a prerogative to the clergy ; like the hpci ¦yoanfiaTa, the sacred and secret writings to the Egyptian priests ; their tyme in the churche of God, when they come thyther. . . .The Evangelist telleth not that Anna in the temple was occupied in hearynge, but that she was occupied in praying. Many heare, and eyther they shortly forget what they have hearde, or elles, if they remember it, yet they do not practise it ; and one houre spente in practisynge is more worthe to us than twentye spent in hearynge : therefore when they come to church, and heare the priestes, who sayeth common prayer for all the whole multitude, albeit they under stand them not, yet yf they be occupied in godlye prayer them selfes, it is sufficient for them. And lette theym not so greatly passe for understandynge what the priestes say, but travayle them selfes in fervent praying, and so shall they hyghly please God. Yea, and experience hath playnlye taught us, that it is much better for them not to understande the common service of the Church, than to understande it, because that, when they heare other prayinge with a lowde voice, in the language that they understande, they are letted from prayer themselfe, and so come they to such a slacknes and negligence in prayinge, that they at lengthe (as wee have well sene of late dayes), in maner pray not at al. And then let them first thynke thys, (for it is undoubtedly true,) that the divine service here in Englande hath ever bene in Latyn synce the first tyme that the fayth was among us receaved, save only this six or seven yeares laste passed : and then how godly the people all that while were disposed, how many vertuous and holy men and women have beene within this realme, and howe God dyd in all thinges prosper us And eyther muste we graunte thys, that there never was any godly men in thys realme, never any sowle saved, never any grace of God among us, never the assistance of the Holye Gooste wyth us, (whych no good nor reasonable manne either can, or wyll graunte,) yf thys be not the true fayth and belefe (whereby men's soules shall be saved) that nowe is amonges us." Signat. x. Compare also Mirror of our Lady, foi. 22. — Commendation of those who attend the divine ser vices without understanding them. See Index, under Service Divine in an unknown tongue. OF POPERY. 151 or the Sibylline oracles to the Roman pontifices, which nobody else was to know. No sooner had Christianity spread itself over the world, but superstition mixed and grew up along with it ; a weed natural to human soil, complexionally inherent in the weaker sex, and adventitious to most of our own. Vast multitudes of all nations withdrew from the world ; renounced human society and all com merce with their own species ; abandoned the cities and villages for the solitude of woods, deserts and caves ; under a false notion of pleasing God better, by such devotion and mortification. But all this was at first pure and simple superstition ; no mixture of avarice and craft in it, no tincture of politic and worldly advantage : their known poverty and perpetual austerities wholly quit them of that suspicion. — But how did popery manage this foible of mankind to its lucre and interest I Under a pretence of a like retirement from the world in a life of prayer and contemplation, they began their monasteries, abbeys, nunneries, &c. which by degrees so vastly multiplied, that, instead of their first pretence of retreating from the world, the very world was filled with them ; instead of the old heremitical poverty, they had drained the riches of kingdoms, had engrossed the fattest of the lands ; nay, had appropriated and devoured the very ministerial wages, the bread and sustenance of the parochial clergy ; who were impoverished, made vile and contemptible, to feed these vassals of the popes in their laziness and luxury. In the early ages of the gospel, there was a high and just veneration for the sepulchres and remains of holy men, for the memorials of them in statue or picture, for the places of their abode ; and especially for the land of Palestine, which the patri archs, the prophets, the Son of God and His apostles, had made sacred by their birth and habitation. This at first was within due bounds ; but superstition was soon engrafted on it and grew to excess : the remains and relics were supposed to work miracles ; the images had not value only, but worship and adoration ; long journeys were taken, to the great detriment of families, to visit holy places, and kiss the footsteps of saints and martyrs. — These bigotries, though even then reprehended by the best fathers of those ages, were yet without any mixture of craft and knavery. But popery soon saw, that here was a proper fund, to be improved and managed to great advantage. Instead of coercion and restraint, they advised, encouraged, commanded those supersti- 152 DOCTRINAL CORRUPTIONS tions, with such scandalous KairriXrfa, such abominable traffic, as even paganism would blush at. All the graves and catacombs were exhausted to furnish relics : not a bone, not the least scrap of raiment of any saint, that was not removed into the holy ward robe to raise money to the showers. Where the monuments were dubious and blended, the names and bodies of pagan slaves were taken into the chm-ch calendar and treasury : disputes and quarrels arose among the numerous pretenders to one and the same relic, which could never be decided ; but the victory was various and alternate, according to the fruitful inventions and ingenious lies of the contending impostors. Even statues and pictures of the same saint were made to rival each other : and the Blessed Virgin, like Juno Lucina and Juno Sospita, had as many numina 1 and specific powers, as she had pictures and statues ; one celebrated for one virtue, another for another. No piety was thought acceptable, no life religiously spent, without a pilgrimage to some foreign saint ; where vows and rich offerings must be paid at the shrine. But, above all, the endeavour to gain the Holy Land 2 by driving out the Saracens was the most promising project, the very masterpiece of popery. What arts were used, or what not used, to inveigle the princes and nobility of Europe into that romantic expedition ! Every hour of grief or sickness, every hour of mirth and wine, were a snare and trepan to them. If in any of those softer moments they once rashly took the cross on their garments, the vow was irrevocable : to break it was thought attended with all misfortunes in this world, and damnation in the other. In the mean time salvation, like soldier's pay, was promised and insured to all that embarked : the heavenly Jerusalem to be their certain acquisition, though they failed and perished in fighting for the earthly. — Now while the world by these artifices was made mad and infatuate ; while princes abandoned their own realms, and left the regency in weak or treacherous hands ; while for several generations all Europe was exhausted of its strength and its wealth, and the remainder over run with superstition and leprosy ; the contrivers of all this were not wanting to their own interest. It was then in the absence of so many kings, and the distracted condition at home, that popery made its most plentiful harvest : then cities with their large terri tories were extorted out of the owners' hands, and made the patri- 1 .4* many numina.] See Index, under Walsingham. our Lady of. 2 Holy Land.] See Index, under Crusade. OF POPERY. 153 mony of the church: then investitures, faculties, dispensations, bulls, the whole shop and warehouse of profit and power, were extended and exerted over all persons and employments : then, in a word, was mankind enslaved, and popery trod upon the necks of princes. — And well was it for Palestine that the Saracens kept possession of it. If popery had succeeded in its attempt on that country, what a new revenue from pilgrimages ! what an inex haustible store of religious merchandise ! Every stone there would have been a sacred relique. If we may guess from some histories, the very soil 1 would have been dug up and exported by this time ; and customers invited to the purchase by a new legend of miracles. Not a chm-ch in Europe would have been counted holy ; not a palace or seat lucky or prosperous ; not an estate, not a field or close, fertile to the owner ; that had not some of the holy earth to bless and to sanctify it. When the empire was first Christian, though the bishops of Rome had no more under their inspection than the suburbicarian regions ; yet the great city imperial, the metropolis of the Western world, gave them a just pre-eminence above those of inferior and municipal towns. And so, those of Constantinople 1 The very soil.] At times there seems to have been a wild spirit extensively prevalent, which hardly admits even of a representation hke this being regarded as mere rant and rodomontade. " I am bold to say," affirms Richard Bristow, in his famous book Motives to the Catholic Faith, written in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, in the year 1574, "and prove it well I can, that whereas Christian people of those first ages are counted, as they were indeed, far more godly and more holy, and more devout than we, for no other cause it was, but only because they prac tised the things afore-named and such like, much more often, more religi- ouslie, and, as the heretics would have it falsely called and counted, much more superstitiously, than we do : more going a pilgrimage, more kissing of reliques and kneeling unto them, more crying out to saints, and all other things much more in those days than in these : and therefore, I say, people then were more devout and religious than now. Such going then a pilgrimage to Jerusalem, that S. Hierome sayeth of the holie places of our Saviour's nati- vitie, crosse, resurrection and ascension, ' ad quse de toto orbe concurritur,' (in Isai. xix.) ; unto which holy places there is concourse of people out of all the world. Even the verie holie earth of our Saviour's sepulcher brought home by pilgrims, and given to their friends, and used to hang in their chamber, to save them from evil ; yea, so reverenced that they would not keepe it in their chambers, but build churches to lay it in, for people at it to serve God, to come to it a pilgrimage, and that withfollowing of great miracles; all which S. Augustine writeth of his owne time, being himselfe a partie therein. (De Civit. Dei, lib. xxii. cap. 8.)" foi. 53, 4. edit. 1599. 154 DOCTRINAL CORRUPTIONS had a due deference paid them by the other bishops of the east, as fiaaiXtirspoi aXXwv, as presiding over a diocese the most numerous and the most potent. A fit regard always was and ought to be had to their advice, concurrence, and assistance ; since their example must needs have the greatest influence on the peace of the whole church. — Now how did popery make use of this advantage of situation, to make spiritual Rome as much the empress of the church as ever civil Rome had been of the state ? In long tract of time they reduced all under their power ; not by our Saviour's declaration, t-rrl ravry ry irirpq, " upon this rock I will build my church ;" as if that was the Tarpeian rock, and the cliff of the Roman capital : but by the subtlest arts of politic continued from age to age with indefatigable address ; by sowing factions among all other bishops, and then promoting appeals to the arbitration of popes, who always decided for those that owned their authority ; by creating new bishops against those in posses sion, the event whereof was both ways the certain increase of papal power : for either the pope's new title prevailed ; or the former bishop, after long charge and vexation, was content for quietness' sake to keep his own, as the gift of the pope J by an 1 As the gift of the pope.] "The wisdom of the court of Rome," says Twisden shrewdly, "is to give, what it can neither sell, nor keep." Vindica tion, fee. p. 176. Again, "Things done by princes of their own right, popes finding no means to stop, would, in former ages, as in later, by privilege continue unto them. 'Nicholaus Papa hoc domino meo privilegium, quod ex paterno jure susceperat, prsebuit,' said the emperor's advocate. (Baronii Annal. aim. 1059. n. 22.) And the same pope, finding our kings to express one part of their office to be 'regere populum Domini et ecclesiam ejus,' wrote to Edward the Confessor, ' Vobis et posteris vestris regibus Anglise committimus advocationem ejusdem loci et omnium totius Angliae ecclesiarum, et, ut, vice nostra, cum consilio episcoporum et abbatum constituatis ubique quae justa sunt.' .... Besides, kings did many times ask as grants those things of the pope, which they well understood themselves to have the power of doing without him. Henry V. demanded of Martin V. five particulars ; to which the king's ambassadors, finding him not so ready to assent, told him ' se in mandatis habere, ut coram eo profiteantur, regem in iis singulis jure suo usu- rum, utpote quae non necessitatis, sed honoris causa petat ; et ut publicam de ea re coram universo cardinalium coetu protestationem interponant.' And to the same purpose there are sundry examples yet remaining on record (Rot. Pari. 17 Ed. iii. fee), where the king, on petition ofthe Commons for redress in some things amiss of ecclesiastical cognisance, first chooses to write to the pope; but on his delay or failing to give satisfaction, doth either OF POPERY. 155 after-act of confirmation. And as they then managed with the bishops, so in time they dealt with princes : fomented rebellions of their subjects ; set brother up against brother in pretence to the crown ; who was to own it when obtained as a donation from Rome: and the contract for it, that all the ecclesiastical dignities should be in the pope's collation. By these methods, continued through many successions, the result at last was, that he was the spiritual monarch of the universe, the acknowledged patron of all church preferments ; that all bishops held their jurisdiction not from Christ but from him : that kings themselves were no kings, till accepted and confirmed by him : that they might be resisted, deposed, or murdered ; if they did not govern by his dictates and directions: that he, as visible head ofthe church, was superior to general councils : that he, perhaps at first some ignorant monk, after he was once chosen pope, though without the suffrage either of clergy or people, by a mercenary conclave and nocturnal cabal of cardinals — a new order contrived by popery to depress and sub due the bishops — was immediately gifted with infallibility. — O hor rible profanation of a Divine attribute ! 0 audacious and ridicu lous claim; which though no pope can ever believe of himself; and the cardinals his electors, like the haruspices of old, may laugh at when they see each other ; yet it is a useful pretence in the way of pohtic, and of great moment among the adoring crowds to support and establish his usurped spiritual empire. As the Christians in the first ages were all educated in the midst of paganism, and the most of them made converts out of it; so it could not be avoided, but that many must assume or transfer some pagan notions into the system of Christianity. Besides the One supreme God the pagans had vast numbers of inferior deities, himself by statute redress the inconvenience, or commands the archbishop to see it done." Ibid. 17, 18. Twisden's Vindication, fee. This valuable book, Twisden's Vindication, fee. written twenty years before the author's death, was not published till three years after it, and then came forth without a word of explanation or narrative from the editor. It is greatly to be regretted, that it is printed so incorrectly as to be not unfre quently quite unintelligible. It is much to be wished, therefore, if the family are in possession of any better manuscript and additional materials, that this should be known, and that the book should appear in a new edition, as well to the benefit of the pubhc, as in justice to the memory of a very eminent and excellent person. — [This has been done under the editorial care of the learned Master of Jesus College, Cambridge.] Some particulars respecting Twisden may be found in Hasted's Hist, of Kent, vol. ii. 275, 6. 156 DOCTRINAL CORRUPTIONS who had every one shares of the common devotion. This begot in many Christians a like worship of angels and saints, as mediators and intercessors between them and the heavenly Father. The Bii Manes of the pagans, and the parentations to their dead ancestors, produced a near resemblance to them among some Christians, that offered solemn prayers and expiations for the souls of their deceased relations. The Platonic notion, that the laaifia a/iaprrifiaTa, the cm-able sins, the delible stains, of departed souls were scourged and purged off by proportionate punishments; ali* panduntur inanes Suspense ad ventos ; aliis sub gurgite vasto Infectum eluitur scelus, aut exuritur igni; must naturally raise among some Christians a like persuasion about a future purgatory. These notions and practices, though quite repugnant to the Holy Scriptures, were not discouraged nor forbid by popery; but propagated, enjoined, and enacted: being a most sure and ample fund to increase the church's treasure. In course of time the whole calendar was crowded with saints; not a day in the year without its red letter : every trade and profession had its saint tutelar and peculiar; who must be retained and engaged with presents and oblations. Horses, cows, and sheep, every animal domestic, the fields and the vineyards, the very fur niture of houses, must be annually blessed and sanctified, at a set price for the blessing. And if the old set of saints should by long time grow cheap and vulgar ; there still was a reserve in popery to enhance and quicken the low market by making new and fresh ones in acts of canonization. And then by their prayers and the masses for the dead, to ease and shorten the pains of purgatory ; what a spacious door was opened for a per petual flow of money ! what family was not daily pillaged of some part of its substance ! What heart could bear, that his dead father should fry in the flames of purgatory when a moderate sum might buy him out of them ; or who would not secure him self by a timely legacy for masses for his soul, without leaving it to the conscience and courtesy of his heir ? But what do we speak of this popish traffic for the sins of the dead ; when the very sins of the living, the wages of damnation, were negotiated and trucked, indulged or pardoned, by the wicked politic of popery ! — As in common life we daily see, that an offi cer shall permit and license those very frauds for money, which OF POPERY. 157 his office itself constitutes him and commands him to prevent ; so has popery done in that great affair of a Christian life and the duties of the Gospel. To engross which profitable trade, it was first necessary, that Rome should challenge the sole custody of the keys of heaven and hell, should claim the sole power of loosing and binding, should possess the sole mint of all spiritual licences and pardons. When this was once arrogated and obtained, what an impious KairnAsi'a, what an extensive traffic was opened ! As the other schemes drew in the superstitious and the bigots, so this was to wheedle and pillage the profane, the impure, the vil lains of the world. The common sale was soon proclaimed for indulgences and pardons for all crimes past or to come, already committed or hereafter designed ; the price raised and enhanced according to the deeper dye and blackness of the guilt. The stated market at Rome was not sufficient for the commerce ; the princes only and the nobles could afford to send thither for them : so that, for the ease and benefit of trade, blank instruments were issued out for all the countries of Europe, and retailed by the spiritual pedlars at the public markets and at the private doors ; such a cheap pardon cried aloud for the more common sins of lying, swearing, drunkenness, or fornication ; a higher price in private for robbery or murder ; a higher still for sodomy or incest. Thus were the grace of God, the remission of sins, all the privi leges of the Gospel, trucked and cauponated by popery, for sordid and detestable lucre, upon the open scheme and the bare foot of atheism. It is true, indeed, that when the light of the reformation broke out, and good letters revived and spread around ; even the popish provinces grew too wise and sagacious for this gross imposture : such wretched wares were thenceforth chiefly vended among the poor ignorants of America. — But there soon arose a new set of loose and profligate casuists ' ; who, to engage on their side the libertine part of mankind, since impunity in sins would no longer be bought with money, should distribute it gratis, and instruct them to be wicked without remorse and with assurance. These are they, who (contrary to St. Paul, Rom. iii. 8,) " are not slan derously reported to say, Let us do evil, that good may come :" who excuse and patronize the vilest corruptions, the foulest cheats, forgeries, and extortions in common dealing : who teach that no faith promised or sworn to heretics or enemies is ofany obliga tion : who defend common perjury and perfidiousness by the 1 Profligate casuists.] See Index, under Jesuits. 158 DOCTRINAL CORRUPTIONS scandalous shifts of equivocals and mental restrictions : who have glossed and warped all the severe rules of the gospel about chas tity, charity, and forgiveness, to the worldly and wicked notions of gallantry and point of honour : who sanctify the horridest villanies ; murders, plots, assassinations, massacres, (like the in tended one of this day \) if designed for the service of the church : who, in a word, have given such vicious systems of morals, such a licence to corrupt nature, as a heathen Stoic, Platonic, or Aca demic, nay an Epicurean, though in himself never so wicked, durst not have polluted his pages with, out of reverence to his sect. I might proceed, would the time permit me, to discover all the rest of their politic arts, the mysteries of their spiritual trade : for such are all their peculiar tenets, that were discarded at the Reformation. What availed it to the clergy, that the Scriptures expressly said, " Marriage is honourable in all: let a bishop, let a presbyter be the husband of one wife ; one that ruleth well in his own house ; having faithful children, kept in subjection with all gravity ? " This did not suit with popish politic : this tied and attached the clergy to the common interest of mankind : their affection to their own children made their country also dear to them ; made them love and pity the abused laity : they were not vassals devoted enough to the service of a foreign master : the riches of the church did not flow in one channel, nor all revert at last to that one fountain and receptacle. And for these pious reasons, in spite of plain Scripture, of the authority of ages be fore, of all the lusts and impurities that must necessarily follow, a chaste legitimate marriage shall be forbidden to the clergy; and an adulterous celibacy shall be enjoined universal. But what can plain Scripture avail against the avarice and pride of popery ; when both common sense internal, and the joint testimony of all our outward senses, must submit to its decrees, when it is to advance its profit or power ? That due respect ever paid to rd ayia, the consecrated bread and wine at the holy communion, was easily raised by superstition and ignorance to the highest excess, to notions improbable and impossible. This fair handle was not neglected by popery : by slow degrees tran- substantiation was enacted into an article of faith, and a very beneficial one to the priests ; since it made them the makers of God, and a sort of gods among the people. — But we must think better and juster of the contrivers of it, than that they them- 1 Of this day.] November 5. OF POPERY. 159 selves believed it : they did or could believe it no more, than a proposition made up ofthe most disparate ideas, that "sound may be turned into colour, a syllogism into a stone." It was not ignorance or stupidity ; but the most subtle and crafty politic that produced transubstantiation. Thence the awful pomp, the august cavalcades in the processions of the host : as if they would outdo the pagan ones of Cybele, Ingratos animos atque impia pectora vulgi Conterrere metu quae possint numine Divse : thence the presence of God continually resident, corporeal at the high altar : thence to exhibit it perpetually there, the wafer, panis a^vfiog, unleavened, unfermented bread, was taken into the so lemnity ; both against ancient practice, and the perpetual custom of the Greek church : because common bread would soon have grown mouldy, and not pass with the palate of the multitude for the body of God. Thence at last in the thirteenth century was the cup denied to the laity ; not for not seeing the plain words of the Scripture, " Drink ye all of this ;" not for the dearness or scarcity of wine, which is cheap and common in those climates ; not for the then pretended reason, that the mustaches or whis kers in the mode of that age used to dip into the holy cup ; but because it was inconsistent with the rest of the show. So small a quantity of wine even after consecration would soon grow dead and vapid ; would discover its true nature, if tasted after long standing. The wine therefore, because it interferes with the standing ceremony and continued pageantry of transubstantia tion, has not the honour to be reposited with the wafer on the altar, nor to accompany it in the solemn processions. I might now go on to show you a more dismal scene of impos tures, their judicia Bei, the judgments of God, as they blas phemously called them, when no human evidence could be found : their trials by ordeal ; by taking a red-hot iron in the hand ; by putting the naked arm into hot boiling water ; by sinking or swimming in pools and rivers, when bound fast hand and foot : all of them borrowed or copied from pagan knavery and supersti tion ; and so manageable by arts and slights, that the party could be found guilty or innocent, just as the priests pleased, who were always the triers. — What bribes were hereby procured ! what false legacies extorted ! what malice and revenge executed ! — on all which if we should fully dilate and expatiate, the intended 160 DOCTRINAL CORRUPTIONS tragedy of this day, which now calls for our consideration, would scarce appear extraordinary. — Dreadful indeed it was ; astonishing to the imagination : all the ideas assembled in it of terror and horror. Yet when I look on it with a philosophical eye, I am apt to felicitate those appointed for that sudden blast of rapid destruction ; and to pity those miserables that were out of it, the designed victims to slow cruelty, the intended objects of lingering persecution. For since the whole plot (which will ever be the plot of popery) was to subdue and enslave the nation ; who would not choose and prefer a short and despatching death, quick as that by thunder and lightning, which prevents pain and percep tion, before the anguish of mock trials, before the legal accom modations of jails and dungeons, before the peaceful executions by fire and fagot ? who would not rather be placed, direct above the infernal mine, than pass through the pitiless mercies, the salutary torments of a popish inquisition ; that last accursed con trivance of atheistical and devilish politic ? If the other schemes have appeared to be the shop, the warehouse of popery, this may be justly called its slaughter-house and its shambles. Hither are haled poor creatures (I should have said rich ; for that gives the frequentest suspicion of heresy) without any accuser, without allegation of any fault. They must inform against themselves, and make confession of something heretical ; or else undergo the discipline of the various tortures ; a regular system of ingenious cruelty, composed by the united skill and long successive expe rience of the best engineers and artificers of torment. That savage saying of Caligula's, horrible to speak or hear, and fit only to be writ in blood, Itaferi, ut se mori sentiat, is here heightened and improved : Ita se mori sentiat, ut ne moriatur, say these mer ciful inquisitors. The force, the effect of every rack, every agony, are exactly understood : this stretch, that strangulation is the utmost nature can bear ; the least addition will overpower it ; this posture keeps the weary soul hanging upon the lip ; ready to leave the carcase, and yet not suffered to take its wing : this ex tends and prolongs the very moment of expiration ; continues the pangs of dying without the ease and benefit of death. — O pious and proper methods for the propagation of faith ! 0 true and genuine vicar of Christ, the God of mercy, and the Lord of peace ! And now, after this short but true sketch and faithful landscape of popery, I presume there is but little want of advice or applica- OF POPERY. 161 tion. If this first character iii the text belongs to popery ; let us secure the other to ourselves, " that we handle the word in sin cerity, as of God, as in the sight of God in Christ." The Refor mation without this must forfeit kits name ; and the church of England must lose its nature. "'Let every one therefore that thinks he stands take heed lest he fall." Our very text informs us, that in the apostle's own days, when the church was in its greatest purity and simplicity ; there were even then many Ka7rnXot, fraudulent dealers, among its members : though the traffic must needs run low, when the whole community was so poor. But when the emperors became Christian, and the immense revenues of the pagan priesthood were (as indeed they ought to be) all confiscated and distributed ; without doubt the spoil and the plunder attracted crowds of new converts ; and the courtiers found it useful to declare themselves good Christians. Even the Reformation itself did not make the slower progress for the vast riches of the monasteries that were to be dissolved ; nor had it been less honour to it, if as the lands and manors of the abbeys were justly restored to the laity ; so their impropriations had reverted to the parochial clergy, from whom they had been robbed. To say the truth, the spirit of popery is near as old as the human race ; it is in all ages and places ; and even then exerts itself when it demolishes popery. The generality of men, ot iroWol, were always tzairrikoi, traders in a profession. The Epicureans of old, though they denied and derided the heathen gods, would yet gladly accept of a fat benefice, " opimum sacerdotium ;" and to gain an ample revenue, would officiate at those altars which they silently laughed at. — -Think not, therefore, that all the priests were the vilest of men ; but that some of the vilest of men got in to be priests. They saw the opportunity of enslaving and pillag ing mankind, if they could but manage the priesthood upon atheistical principles. This was the temptation, this gave the original to popery ; and nothing to be accused for it but human nature in common. — -What profession,' what conjunction of lay men, if not continually watched, if not curbed and regulated by authority, have not abused the like advantage and ascendant in their several ways, to their private emolument and the oppression of the public ? Let us watch therefore against this fatal degene ration incident to all things. He that aims malis artibus to arrive at church preferment, by sinful or servile compliance, by turbu- lency and faction ; what is he but tccnrriXog, a trafficker for sordid VOL. I. M 162 DOCTRINAL CORRUPTIONS lucre 1 He that zealously vends his novelties, or revives dead and buried heresies to the disturbance of the community ; what is he but a trader for the fame of singularity ? He that labours to dig up all the fences of the church ; to throw down her articles and canons, her liturgy and ceremonies ; to extinguish her nur series of learning ; and when he has made her a mere waste and a common, shall call that a comprehension ; what is he but a vile factor to libertinism and sacrilege ? He that propagates suspected doctrines, such as praying for the dead, auricular confession, and the like, whose sole tendency is the gain and power of the priest ; what is he but a negotiator for his partisans abroad ? what does he but sow the seeds of popery in the very soil of the reformation ? But if we are to watch against the silent tide of popery in the small rivulets at home ; much more against its inundation and deluge from abroad : which always meditates, and now threatens J to overwhelm us. If foreign popery once return and regain all the provinces that it lost at the Reformation, — 0 the terrible storm of persecution at its first regress ! 0 the dark prospect of slavery and ignorance for the ages behind ! In tract of time it will rise again to as full a measure of usurped hierarchy, as when the hero Luther first pro claimed war against it. For then was popery in its meridian height : it was not raised up all at once, but by the slow work of many centuries. In all the steps and advances of its progress, the good men of the several ages opposed it, but in vain : they were overborne by a majority ; were silenced by the strong argu ments of processes and prisons. For it first subdued its own priests, before it brought the laity under its yoke. Good letters became a crime even in the clergy. Or heresy or magic, accord ing to the different turn of men's studies, was a certain imputation upon all that dared to excel. And though popery, since the Reformation, has even in its own quarters permitted learning and humanity ; and prudently withdrawn some of its most scandalous trumpery : yet if once again it sees itself universal, the whole ware house, now kept under key, will again be set wide open : the old tyranny will ride triumphant upon the necks of enslaved mankind, with certain provision against a future revolt. The two instruments, the two parents of the Reformation, ancient learning, and the art of printing, both coming providentially at one juncture of time, will be made the first martyrs, the earliest sacrifice to popish 1 Now threatens.] A.D. 1715. OF POPERY. 163 politic. The dead languages, as they are now called, will then die in good earnest. All the old authors of Greece and Italy, as the conveyers of hurtful knowledge, as inspirers of dangerous liberty, will be condemned to the flames ; an enterprise of no difficulty, when the pope shall once again be the general dictator. All these writings must then perish together : no old records shall survive, to bear witness against popery ; nor any new be permitted to give it disturbance. The press will then be kept under custody in a citadel, like the mint and the coinage : nothing but mass books and rosaries, nothing but dry postills and fabulous legends, shall then be the staple commodities, even in an university. For the double festivity therefore of this candid and joyful day ; for the double deliverance obtained in it, the one from the con spiracy of popery, the other from its tyranny ; for the happy preservation of our religion, laws, and liberties under the protec tion of pious and gracious princes ; for the flourishing estate of learning and the prosperity of our nursing mother, be all thanks, praise and glory to God for ever and ever. Amen. m 2 JOHN WICKLIFFE. The Popish emissaries boast that Popery is as ancient as Christianity. So far is this from being true, that during the first six hundred years after Christ there was no such thing as Popery in the world. Nay, Doctor Wickliffe maintained, that it had no being until after the loosing of Satan in the second millenary. John Lewis. As for John Wickliffe, John Hubs, Vaido, and the rest, for aught I know, and I beheve, setting malice aside, for aught you know, they were godly men. Their greatest heresie was this, that they complained of the dissolute and vicious lives of the clergy, of worshipping images, of fained miracles, of the tyrannical pride of the pope, of monks, friers, pardons, pil grimages, and purgatory, and other hke deceiving and mocking of the people ; and that they wished a reformation of the church. Bishop Jewel. JOHN WICKLIFFE1. After al these heretofore recited2, by whom (as ye have heard) it pleased the Lord something to worke against the bishop of Rome, and to weaken the pernicious superstition of the friers ; it now remaineth consequently, following the course of yeares, orderly to enter into the storie and tractation of John Wickliffe our countriman, and other more of his time, and same countrie, whom the Lord (with the like zeale and power of spirit) raised up here in England, to detect more fully and amplie the poison of the pope's doctrine, and false religion set up by the friers. In whose opinions and assertions, albeit some blemishes perhaps may be noted ; yet such blemishes they be which rather declare him to be a man that might erre, than which directly did fight against Christ our saviour, as the pope's proceedings and the friers did. — And what doctor or learned man hath been from the prime age of the church, so perfect, so absolutely sure, in whom no opinion hath sometime swerved awrie? And yet be the said articles of his, neither in number so many, nor yet so grosse in themselves and so cardinall, as those cardinall enemies of Christ perchance do give them out to be ; if his books, which they 1 John Wickliffe.] On the history of Wickliffe, and his opinions, the reader may consult Harpsfield's Historia Hasresis Wicleviana, foi. 1622. James's Apologie for John Wickliffe, shewing his conformitie with the now Church of England, 4to. 1608; Tanner's Bibliotheca, p. 767—772; Wharton's Appendix to Cave's Historia Literaria, vol. ii. p. 60 — 65 ; Lewis's History of the Life and Sufferings of John Wickliffe, 8vo. 1723, and 1820 : and the Life of Rey nold Pecock, Bishop of St. Asaph, 8vo. 1744, and 1820, by the same author. 2 Heretofore recited.] Robert Grosthed, bishop of Lincoln ; Richard Fitz- ralph, archbishop of Armagh ; Nicolas Orem ; the author of the Prayer and Complaint of the Plowman and others. 168 JOHN WICKLIFFE. abolished 3, were remaining to be conferred with those blemishes, which they have wrested to the worst, as evil will never said the best. This is certaine, that he being the publike reader of divinitie " in the universitie of Oxford, was for the rude time wherein he 3 His books, which they abolished.] These endeavours to abolish were by a constitution of archbishop Arundel (a.d. 1408), and by other expedients of a like nature, of which we shall hear more in the course of this life. Bishop Burnet having, in his History of the Reformation, made a reflection similar to this of Fox, is animadverted upon by the severe pen of Henry Wharton, in the following terms : " It seems the historian knew not any certain means of gaining information of Wickliffe's true opinions ; but when he would include all others in the same ignorance of them, we must desire to be excused. We have as many of the works of Wickliffe yet extant, as, if printed together, would make four or five volumes in folio. And whether so many books be not sufficient to teach us his opinions, let the reader judge. " — Specimen of Errors and Defects in the History ofthe Reformation, by Anth. Harmer. P. 16. Nor is there indeed now much occasion that we should have recourse even to manuscripts, to enable us to distinguish the real from the imputed doctrines of Wickliffe. The following works have been printed : Dialogorum, lib. 4. 1525 and 1753; Wickliffe's Wicket, 1546, &c; Prologue to the Bible, under the title, Pathway to perfect Knowledge (if this be indeed Wickliffe's), 1550; Aphorismi Wicleviani, 1554; Complaint to the King and Parliament, with a Treatise against the Friars, 1608 ; Translation ofthe New Testament, 1731, foi. These, with the addition of the books mentioned in note ('), p. 167, and the third volume of Wilkins's Concilia, leave no longer much room to complain of deficiency of materials for information respecting the sentiments which he entertained in the principal heads of rehgion. Still, it is greatly to be wished, that much more of works, at once both so extraordinarily valuable and so curious, might be given to the world, carefully printed, from manuscripts still extant : and that, from among his Latin works, particularly the extensive treatise, " De Veritate Scriptures," so often referred to by Dr. Thomas James in his Apology for Wickliffe, might be one of the first. Of this work, a copy, perhaps the only perfect one, exists in the library of Trinity College, Dublin. A full account of the famous MS. of Wicliffe in Trinity College, which once belonged to Sir Robert Cotton, has been given by Dr. J. H. Todd, Senior Fellow of Trinity College, Dublin, in the preface to Wicliffe's "Apology for Lollard Doctrines," printed for the Camden Society, in 1842. Dr. Todd had previously printed, in 1840, "The Last Age of the Church," and has recently printed, in 1851, "Three Treatises: I. Of the Church and her Members : II. Of the Apostacy of the Church : III. Of Antichrist and his Meynee." Dublin, sm. 4to. All of these are taken from the same MS. A complete edition of the Wicliffite version of the Old and New Testament was published by the University of Oxford in 1850, 4 vols. 4to. 4 Reader of divinitie.] Wickliffe was born, probably, about the year 1324; and he began to deliver Theological Lectures in 1372, in the reign of Ed ward III. Lewis's History, p. 1 and 18. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 169 lived, famously reputed for a great clerke, a deepe schooleman, and no lesse expert in all kind of philosophic The which doth not only appeare by his owne most famous and learned writings and monuments, but also by the confession of Walden, his most cruell and bitter enemie ; who, in a certaine epistle written unto pope Martin the fift 5, saith that " he was wonderfully astonished at his most strong arguments, with the places of authoritie which he had gathered, and with the vehemencie and force of his reasons6. It appeareth by such as have observed the order and course of times, that this Wickliffe flourished about the yeare of our Lord 1371, Edward the third raigning in England : for thus we do find in the chronicles of Caxton: "In the yeare of our Lord 1371, Edward the third, king of England, in his parliament, was against the pope's clergie. He willingly harkened and gave eare to the voices and tales of heretikes, with certaine of his counsell, con ceiving and following sinister opinions against the clergie. Where fore, afterward, he tasted and suffered much adversity and trouble. 6 Martin the fift.] Thomas Netter, called Waldenus from his native place in Essex, who dedicated to Martin V. his work, called Doctrinale Antiquitatum Fidei Ecclesim Catholicee. It has been printed at Paris, in 1521 — 3, and 1532; at Salamanca, in 1556; and at Venice, in 1571. 6 Of his reasons.] The following extract I borrow from a short Life of Wickliffe, subjoined to James's Apology for John Wickliffe, shewing his con formity with the now Church of England. 1608. 4to. " He was beloved of all good men for his good life, and greatly admired of his greatest adversaries, for his learning and knowledge, both in divinity and humanity. He writ so many large volumes in both, as it is almost incredible. He seemed to follow, in the whole course of his studies, the method of the schoolmen : and amongst them he was a professed follower of Ocham ; by reading of whose learned books, and sundry others which lived about the same time, or not long before ; such as were Bradwardine, Marsilius, Guido de Sancto Amore, Abelardus, Armachanus, and that true great clerk Robert Grosthead, God gave him grace to see the truth of his gospel, and by seeing of it to loathe all superstition and popery. Of Ocham and Marsilius (see p. 199, post) he was informed of the pope's intrusions and usurpations upon kings, their crowns and dignities : of G. de S. Amore and Armachanus he learned the sundry abuses of monks and friers in upholding this usurped power : by Abelard and others he was grounded in the right faith of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper : by Bradwardine, in the nature of a true soul-justifying faith against merit-mongers and pardoners : finally, by reading Grosthead's works, in whom he seemed to be most conversant, he descried the pope to be open antichrist, by letting the gospel to be preached, and by placing unable and unfit men in the church of God. He passed through all degrees in this famous university very commendably." 170 JOHN WICKLIFFE. And not long after, in the yeare of our Lord 1372, he wrote unto the bishop of Rome, that he should not by any meanes inter meddle any more within his kingdome, as touching the reserva tion, or distribution of benefices 7 : and that all such bishops as were under his dominion, should injoy their former and ancient libertie, and be confirmed of their metropolitanes, as hath been accustomed in times past." Thus much writeth Caxton in chap. ccxxxvi. of the Cronicles of England, printed in 1480. But as touching the just number of the yeare and time, we will not be very curious or carefull about it at this present. This is out of all doubt, that at what time all the world was in most desperate and vile estate, and that the lamentable ignorance and darknesse of God's truth had overshadowed the whole earth ; this man, Wickliffe, stepped forth like a valiant champion, unto whom it may justly be applied that is spoken in the booke called Ecclesias- ticus 8, of one Simon the sonne of Onias : " Even as the morning star being in the middest of a cloud, and as the moone being full 7 The reservation . . . of benefices.] This refers to a power gradually usurped by the popes to a very great extent ; whereby, before any ecclesiastical promotion became vacant the see of Rome reserved the future nomination to itself, pro vided a successor to the bishopric or benefice, and declared that if any pre sentation was made, it should be null and void. In one of these letters of the king and his parliament to Pope Clement VI. they thus solemnly expostulate against this grievous evil. " We have thought meet to signifie unto your holiness, that divers reser vations, provisions, and collations, by your predecessours apostolike of Rome, and by you, most holy father, in your time have been granted (and that more largely than they have beene accustomed to be) unto divers persons, as wel strangers and of sundry nations, as unto some such as are our enemies ; having no understanding at all of the tongue and conditions of them, of whom they have the government and cure : whereby a great number of soules are in perill, a great many of their parishioners in danger, the service of God de stroyed, the almes and devotion of all men diminished, the hospitals perished, the churches with their appurtenances decayed, charitie withdrawne, the good and honest persons of our realme unadvanced, the charge and government of soules not regarded, the devotion of the people restrained, many poore scholars unpreferred, and the treasure of the realme carried out, against the minds and intents of the founders. All which errors, defaults, and slanders, most holy father, wee neither can nor ought to suffer or endure." Fox's Acts, p. 353. Edit. )6l0. This was in the year 1343. An act was passed in par liament the year following to annul these reservations ; but the effect pro duced was slight. The dispute was several times revived. About the year 1376, they were, on agreement, relinquished formally by the pope : but even this seems not to have been effectual. Wilkins's Concilia, vol. iii. p. 97. s Called Ecclesiasticus.] Chap. 1. ver. 6. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 171 in her course, and as the bright beames of the sunne ; so doth he shine and glister in the temple and church of God." Thus doth almighty God continually succor and help, when all things are in despaire : being alwaies (according to the pro- phecie of the psalme °) " a helper in time of need V — The which thing never more plainly appeared, than in these latter daies and extreame age of the church ; when the whole state and condition, not only of worldly things, but also of religion, was 'so depraved and corrupted, that like as the disease named lethargus among the physitions, even so the state of religion amongst the divines, was past all man's remedie. The onely name of Christ remained amongst Christians, but his true and lively doctrine was as farre unknowne unto the most part, as his name was common unto all men. As touching faith, consolation, the end and use of the law, the office of Christ, of our impotencie and weakenesse, of the Holy Ghost, of the greatnesse and strength of sinne, of true works, of grace and free justification by faith, of libertie of a Christian man, things wherein consisteth and resteth the summe and matter of our profession ; there was no mention, nor any word almost spoken. Scripture-learning and divinitie wasknowne but unto a few, and that in the scholes onely, and there also turned and converted almost all into sophistry. In stead of Peter and Paul, men occupied their time in studying Aquinas and Scotus, and the Master of the Sentences 2. The world forsaking the lively power of God's spirituall word and doctrine, was alto gether led and blinded with outward ceremonies and human traditions, wherein the whole scope, in a manner, of all Christian perfection did consist and depend. In these was all the hope of obtaining salvation fullie fixed ; hereunto all things were attri buted. Insomuch, that scarcely any other thing was seene in the temples or churches, taught or spoken of in sermons, or finallie intended or gone about in their whole life, but only heaping up of certaine shadowed ceremonies upon ceremonies ; neither was there any end of their heaping. 9 The psalme.] Psalme ix. v. 9, &c. 1 In time of need.] On the Causes and Necessity of the Reformation, see Hermanni von der Hardt Historia Literaria Reformations, Parts i. — iv. a.d. 1717; Hottingeri Historia Ecclesiastica, vol. v. — vii.; Gibson's Preservative against Popery, tit. i. p. 1 — 132 ; Casaubon's Dedication to King James I. of his Exercitations against Baronius. 2 Ofthe Sentences.] Peter Lombard. 172 JOHN WICKLIFFE. The people were taught to worship no other thing but that which they did see, and did see almost nothing which they did not worship. The church being degenerated from the true apostolicke insti tution above all measure, (reserving only the name of the apos tolicke church, but far from the truth thereof in very deed) did fall into all kinds of extreame tyrannie ; whereas the povertie and simplicitie of Christ was changed into crueltie and abomina tion of life. In stead of the apostolicke gifts, and their continuall labors and travels, slothfulness and ambition was crept in amongst the priests. Besides all this, there arose and sprung up a thousand sorts and fashions of strange religions3, being the onely roote and 3 Sorts and fashions of strange religions.] That is, the various sects and orders of monks and friars. Amid so many corruptions, it is not to be wondered that the contagion spread from the heart and from manners, and invaded the popular language. Of this very baneful species of degeneracy, the instances are by no means infrequent. We have an example before us in the use of this term religion ; a word, -to the participation of which, with its corresponding epithet religious, the laity seem to have been allowed to make hardly any pretension. They were almost exclusively appropriated to the clergy, and especially to one division of them, the several orders of monks and friars. Thus we read, in the Complaint and Prayer of the Ploughman, the work of a professed reformer: "The pope clepith (calleth) himselfe father of fathers, and maketh many religions. But whether is love and charity encreased by these fathers and by their religions, or else ymade lesse ? For a frier ne loveth not a monke, ne a secular man neither ; nor yet one frier another that is not of the order. Ah Lord ! me thinketh that there is little perfection in these religions ! The service that Thou desirest is keeping of thine hests (commandments); and then a lewd man (lay-man) may serve God, as well as a man of religion ; though that the ploughman he may not have so much silver for his prayer, as men of religion." — Fox, p. 368. Whytford's Pype of Perfection, printed a.d. 1532, is an elaborate apology for monachism. This curious book furnishes us with many examples of the same abuse of the term religion. " Religyon is made and standeth principally in the three essencial vowes, obedience, wilfull po vertie, and chastitie. For these thre ben the substanciall partes of religyon.'' Foi. 2. — " The great heretyke Luther, with all his discyples, done deprave and utterly condempne all maner of religyons, except onely (as they call hit) the religyon of Christe. Wherefore I thought necessarye (unto the comforte of all suche persones as have or done purpose or intende to entre religyon) some what, after my poore understanding, to speke thereof." Foi. 3.— "A state appertaynynge unto monkes and solitarie persones, whiche state is now called onely religyon. And suche persones as ben bounden unto that state, and done lyve in religion bene alone called religious persones, and none other per sones ben so named communly, but onely they." Foi. 232. The first quotation JOHN WICKLIFFE. 173 well-head of all superstition. How great abuses and depravations were crept into the sacraments, at what time men were compelled to worship similitudes and signes of things, for the very things themselves ; and to adore such things as were instituted and ordained only for memorials ! Finally, what thing was there, in the whole state of Christian religion so sincere, so sound and pure, which was not defiled and spotted with some kind of super stition ? Besides this, with how many bonds and snares of dailie new fangled ceremonies were the sillie consciences of men, redeemed by Christ to liberty, snared and snarled ! Insomuch, that there could be no great difference almost perceived betweene Chris- tianitie and Jewishnesse, save only the name of Christ : so that the state and condition of the Jewes, might seeme somewhat more tolerable than ours. The Christian people were wholly carried away as it were by the noses, with meere decrees and constitutions of men, even whither it pleased the bishops to lead them, and not as Christ's will did direct them. All the whole world was filled and overwhelmed with errors and darkenesse. And no great marvell ; for why, the simple and unlearned people being farre from all knowledge of the holy scripture, thought it sufficient for them, to know onlie these things which were delivered them by their pastors and shepheards * ; and they on the other part taught in a manner nothing else, but such things- as came forth of the court of Rome : whereof the most part in this note supplies another apt instance of the corruption which we are re marking upon, in the use of the word lewd (see p. 368, post) ; which, as it should appear, denoting in its primitive signification, in the Anglo-Saxon, igno rant, was about the age of Wickliffe, perpetually used simply for layman, without being designed to convey any particular reproach; and at other times, in a worse sense, to which it is now exclusively appropriated. Under this ex ample, the presumptuous revilings of the Pharisee can hardly fail of recurring to the mind of my readers. "This people who knoweth not the law, are cursed." John vii. 49. The only remaining instance of a corruption in language, which I shall adduce, is one nearly allied to those above referred to — the use of the term Holy Church. " When men speken of holy churche (says Wickliffe), they understonden anoon prelates and priests, monks, cannons and freres, and all men that have crowns (the tonsure), tho they liven never so cursedly agenst God's law; and clepen not ne holden secular men of holy church, tho they liven never so duly after God's law, and enden in perfect charity." — Lewis's History, p. 126. Compare Tindall's Works, p. 249, a.u. 1571. 4 Pastors and shepheards.] Of whom, according to Wickliffe, were " maney that kunnen not the ten commandements, ne read their Sauter, ne understond a verse of it." — Cheat sentence of Curse expounded; Lewis's Life, &c. p. 40. 174 JOHN WICKLIFFE. tended to the profit of their order, more than to the glorie of Christ. The Christian faith was esteemed or counted none other thing then, but that everie man should know that Christ once suffered, that is to say, that all men should know and understand that thing which the divels themselves also knew. Hypocrisie was counted for wonderfull holinesse. AU men were so addict unto outward shewes, that even they themselves which professed the most absolute and singular knowledge of the Scriptures, scarsly did understand or know any other thing. And this evidently did appeare, not onely in the common sort of doctors and teachers, but also in the very heads and captaines of the church ; whose whole religion and holinesse consisted in a manner in the observ ing of daies, meats and garments, and such like rhetoricall circumstances, as of place, time, person, &c. Hereof sprang so many sorts and fashions of vestures and garments 5 : so many 5 Vestures and garments.] As Black Friars, White Friars, Grey, &c. &c. — "What be these Benedictines, Cistertians, Carmelites, Carthusians, Domi nicans, Franciscans, with others hke, an huge numbre, but names of popishe schismes and sectes ? who, all forsakyng the rehgion and name of Christe, common to all true Christians, have chosen to be called religious, as by a special name of a several! religion; and to be named after men, their fathers on earth, forsakyng the heavenly father, and continuing and accomplishinge the schisme first begunne in S. Paules time, after the example of those who sayd, ' I am of Paule, I of Cephas, I of Apollos ;" saying, ' I am of Dominike, I of Benedicte, I of Francisce,' who also may directly answer S. Paule askyng, ' Was Paule or any other, savyng only Christe crucified for you ? ' ' Yea,' may the Franciscans say, ' S. Francisce was crucified for us of his familie, and beholde the woundes in his side, handes, and feete.' "And leste all these sectes should not be knowen sufficiently by onely diversitie of names, thei have by other infinite wayes and meanes travelled to sever their sectes asundre, studyinge for division as for the best, and flyinge all shewe of unitie as the worste of all thinges. Wherefore to their diversitie of names, they have joyned diversitie of fashions, and diversitie of colours in their apparell; diversitie of girdels, hose, and shooes; diversitie of shavynge, diversitie of goyng, beckyng and bowyng, diversitie of diete and meates, diversitie of readyng, singinge, and tunynge, diversitie of churche service, and diversitie of rules of fife. All times would fayle me, if I should, or coulde rehearse all their diversities, which is the very propertie of schismes and sectes. These be those schismatikes, and sectaries, with an infinite multitude whereof, of late Englande was repleanished ; of the whiche now, thankes be to God, the realme is well ridde : so that if you meete a thousande men and women one after an other severally, and aske of them, ' of what rehgion be you?' they shall all and everyone answereyou, 'I am a Christian; we be-all JOHN WICKLIFFE. 175 differences of colours and meates : with so many pilgrimages to severall places, as though S. James at Compostella " could doe that, which Christ could not doe at Canturburie ; or else that God were not of like power and strength in every place, or could not be found but being sought for by running and gadding hither and thither. Thus the holinesse of the whole yeare was transported and put off unto the Lent season 7. No countrie or Christians :' there shal not one answere to you (as was wonte), ' I am of the religion of S. Francisce, a Franciscane : an other, I am a Dominicaine : the thirde, I am a Carmelite. Et sic de singulis.' One woman shall not answere you : ' I am a Brigittyne : an other, I am a Clarane : the thirde, I am an Eugubine, whiche are all names of abominable sectes and schismes, not onely dividyng, but deniyng, but forgettyng, but rejectinge the religion and name of Jesus Christe." — A Reproof, written by Alexander Nowell, of a book entitled, A Proof of certain Articles in Religion denied by Master Jewell, set forth by Thomas Dorman, B. D. 1565. 4to. foi. p. 55. See also the ninth section of Warlon's History of English Poetry, 8vo. Lond. 1840, vol. ii. p. 87, where is an analysis of Robert Longlande's "Vision of Pierce Ploughman." 8 S. James at Compostella.] The pilgrimage to Compostella in Spain, famous throughout Europe, was accounted one of the most meritorious, and amongst the most highly favoured by supposed miraculous interpositions. A part of its celebrity, we are told, was owing to the length of the way, and the dangers of the journey. " A short pilgrimage (says Weever), is not worth a pin : neither is an image in so much honour and respect in that country where it is, as in far countries. For example, the Italians, yea those who dwell near Rome, will mock and scoff at our English and other pilgrims, who go to see the pope's holiness, and St. Peter's chair ; and yet they themselves will run to see the relics of St. James of Compostella, in the kingdom of Gallicia in Spain, which is above twelve hundred English miles." Weever's Funeral Monuments. Disc. P. clxiii. Edit. 1767. The whole legend upon which the fame and the wealth of this celebrated spot was founded, which " has cost millions of Christians many a weary step over rocks and mountains ; who otherwise would have staid at home, and performed their devotions, and not have, by long sauntering pilgrimages, reduced themselves and their families to beggary ; having nothing, by that means, left them but a few scollop shells upon a threadbare weed, and a feather or two of the cast of the cock which crowed when St. Peter denied his Lord," has been accurately examined, and its numerous falsehoods and absurdities satisfactorily exposed by Dr. Michael Geddes, in the second volume of his Miscellaneous Tracts, p. 208 — 234. 7 Put off unto the Lent season.^ Thus in the Festival, which consists of short sermons or homilies upon many of the Sundays, and the other principal feasts throughout the year, and was the book most commonly read in churches, even till the latter end of the reign of Henry VIII. the discourse for the second Sunday in Lent thus begins : " Good men and women, this is the seconde Sonday in clene Lente ; where- 176 JOHN WICKLIFFE. land was counted holy, but onelie Palestina, where Christ himselfe had walked with his corporall foot. Such was tho blindnesse of that fore lyke as ye have all this yere before made you honest and well besene in good araye to youre body, now shoulde ye be as soone besye to make you a clene soule. Wherefore this tyme of Lente is ordeyned to dense youre con science from all maner rust and fylth of sinne." Festival, foi. 17 b. Again, " And for bycause that every man synnes more or lesse, for to make satysfuc- cyon for trespas, all crysten people ben bounden by the lawe of God and Hooly Chyrche to fast these forty dayes." Festival, foi. 15. From such extracts as these, the reader will see the necessity of a reformation in doctrine, and will recognize one cause of the frequent insertion of those expressions in the liturgy, and other books ofthe Reformers, where Christ is spoken of as a " full and perfect satisfaction," "the only mediator and advocate," &c. — Yet once more. The Golden Legend, so denominated, because "as golde passeth all other metalles, so this boke excedeth all other bokes," upon the first Sunday in Lent, makes the following calculation : " We put to penaunce and affiyecyon fro this present day unto Eester six wekes comynge, that ben forty-two days. Yf the Sondayes be taken awaye, there abyde in the absty- nence but thirty-six dayes : and the yere is demeaned by three hondred and sixty-five dayes : (so; we gyve the tythe of them to God whan we faste." — Golden Legend, foi. 14. Edit. 1527. By Wynkyn de Worde. In the same spirit the clergy of the Lower House of Convocation formally complained to the prelates, in the year 15 '¦&, that among many other erroneous opinions, "it was preached, thought and spoken to the slander of this noble realm, disquietness ofthe people, and damage of Christian souls, that the sinner offending in the Lent or other high feasts of the year, is worthy no more punishment, than he that transgresseth in any other time." — AVilkins's Con cilia, vol. iii. p. 805. But, as knowledge and reformation advanced, a better temper began to prevail. Hence in the year 1545, we find Cuthbert Scot, no very zealous friend to the reformation, in a sermon at St. Paul's cross, thus expressing himself : "Now if the tyme wold suffre me, I wolde speake here of the fashyons of men nowe in these dayes. For many there be, as I thynke, whiche do not walke in this way, but do runne as it were in a circuit, and maye be lykened to a dogge that runneth in a whele, whiche styll goeth and laboreth, and when he maketh an ende, he is even where he begonne. And so I do feare that men do in these dayes. Theyr tyme goeth, and they growe in age, and yet, looke, how they lyved the last yeare, and even so they lyve this yeare, and so wyll do the nexte : nothyng at all increasynge in vertue nor godlynes, but do as vittelars used to do, whiche take bread and drincke of bakers and brewers, to a daye, not payenge money in hande, but tale with them : and when the day of payment cometh, they paye theyr money, and strike off the old tales, and begynne agayne to tayle of newe. And even so do we. We be very bold with God all the yeare longe, and tale with hym tyll Lente comme : and then we be confessed, kepynge abstinence for a tyme, and receyve the holy sacrament, and so gone as Easter is past, we begyn even to tale of newe, and fall agayne to our olde kynde of lyvyng. Bat such be not these that David called in this place, happy ; for they do not walke undefylcd JOHN WICKLIFFE. 177 time, men did strive and fight for the crosse at Hierusalem, as it had been for the chiefe and onelie force and strength of our faith. in this way." Signat. k. 7. Imprynted by Johannes Herford, at the costes of Robert Toye. 1545. Again : after citing so much in conformity with Fox's representation, I cannot refuse myself the satisfaction of producing additional evidence of further reformation, along with the wise and admirable remarks of the author, another protestant writer, Sir Edwin Sandys. He speaks, indeed, of a later day; his work having been written near the close of the reign of queen Elizabeth, A.D. 1599. " Notwithstanding this testimony, I yield not only willingly but gladly to them (for what joy could it be, what grief ought it not to be, to the heart of any man, to see men fall irrecoverably from the love and laws of the Crea tor ?) — that, at one time of the year, namely, at Lent, they are much reformed. No such blasphemy, nor dirty speaking as before ; their vanities of all sorts laid reasonably aside; their pleasures abandoned; their apparel, their diet, and all things else composed to austerity and state of penitence. They have daily, then, their preaching with collections of almes, whereto all men resort : and to judge of them by the outward shew, they seem generally to have very great remorse for their wickedness. In so much, that I must confess I seemed unto myself in Italy to have best learned the right use of Lent ; there first to have discerned the great fruit of it, and the reason for which those sages at first did institute it. Neither can I easily accord to the fancies of such, as because we ought at all times to lead a life worthy of our profession, think it, therefore, superstitious to have one time wherein to exact or expect it more than other ; but rather do thus conceive, that seeing the corruption of times and wickedness of men's nature is now so exorbitant, that an hard matter it is to hold the ordinary sort of men at all times within the fists of piety, justice, and sobriety; it is fit, therefore, there should be one time at least in the year, and that of reasonable continuance, wherein the season itself, the use of the world and practice of all men (for even the Jews and the Turks have their Lents, although different), the commandment of superiors, the provision of fit means to assist therein ; and in sum, the very outward face and expectation as it were of all things, should constrain men, how wicked and wretchless soever, for that time, at least, to recal themselves to some more severe cogitations and courses; lest sin, having no such bridle to check it at any time, should at length wax headstrong and unconquer able in them; and that, on the other side, being thus necessarily inured for a while, though but to make a, bare shew of walking in the paths of virtue, they might afterwards, perhaps, more sincerely and willingly persist (as custom makes hard things pleasant), or at least wise return more readily again unto them some other time.— And verily I have had sundry times this cogitation in Italy, that in so great looseness of life and decay of discipline in those parts, it was the especial great mercy and grace of God, that the severity of Lent should yet still be preserved, lest otherwise the floods of sin growing so strong and outragious, and having no where either bound or bank to restrain them, might plunge that whole nation in such a vol. I. N 178 JOHN WICKLIFFE. It is a wonder to reade the monuments of the former times, to see and understand what great troubles and calamities this crosse hath caused almost in every Christian commonwealth. For the Romish champions never ceased, by writing, admonishing, and counselling, yea and by quarrelling, to move and stir up princes' minds to warre and battell, even as though the faith and beleefe of the gospell, were of small force, or little effect without that woodden crosse. This was the cause of the expedition of the most noble prince, king Richard, unto Hierusalem, who being taken in the same journie, and delivered unto the emperour, could scarslie be ransomed home againe for thirty thousand markes8. In the same enterprise or journie, Fredericus the emperour of Rome, a man of most excellent vertue, was much endamaged, an. 1179. And also Philip the king of France, scarslie returned home againe in safetie, not without great losses : — so much did they esteeme the recovery of the holy citie and crosse 9. Upon this alone, all men's eies, mindes and devotions, were so set and bent, as though either there were no other crosse but that, or that the crosse of Christ were in no other place but only at Hierusalem. Such was the blindnesse and superstition of those daies, which understood or knew nothing but such things as were outwardlie seene : whereas the profession of our religion standeth in much other higher matters and greater mysteries, — What is the cause why Urbanus did so vexe and torment him selfe ? Because that Antioch with the holy crosse, was lost out of the hands of the Christians. For so wee doe find it in the chronicles, " at what time Jerusalem with king Guido, and the gulf of wickedness, and bring them to that last extremity, which should leave them neither hope of better, nor place but for worse. Yea, and I was so farr from thinking the institution of Lent superfluous, or the retaining of it unprofitable, that I rather inclined to like the custom of the Greek Church, who, besides the great Lent, have three other Lents also, at solemn times, in the year ; though those other neither so long, neither yet of so strict and general observations." Sandys's Europa Speculum, p. 21 — 23. edit. 1673. 8 Thirty thousand markes.] In p. 225, vol. i. edit. 1610, Fox tells us that the ransom was sixty thousand marks. From Inett it appears, that the king agreed with the emperor to pay for his ransom a hundred thousand marks, and to find fifty galleys and two hundred knights, at his own charge, for the emperor's service for one year. But as all this could not be raised at once, part of the money was paid, and hostages given for the discharge of the remainder. — Inett's Origines Anglicanee, vol. ii. p. 354. 9 And crosse.] See Index, under Crusade. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 179 crosse of our Lord was taken, and under the power of the sultan, Urbanus took the matter so grievouslie, that for very sorrow he died. In whose place succeeded Lambertus which was called Gregorie the VIII., by whose motion it was decreed by the cardinals, that (setting apart all riches and voluptuousnesse) they should preach the crosse of Christ, and by their povertie and humilitie first of all should take the crosse upon them, and goe before others into the land of Jerusalem." These are the words of the historie ; whereby it is evident unto what grosse- nesse the true knowledge of the spirituall doctrine of the gospell was degenerate and growne in those daies. How great blindnesse and darknesse again, was in those daies, in the primacie, and supremacie of the bishop of Rome; as though the outward succession of Peter and the apostles, had been of great force and effect to that matter ! What doth it force in what place Peter did rule or not rule ? It is much more to be regarded that every man should labour and studie with all their indeavour to follow the life and confession of Peter : and that man seemeth unto me to be the true successor of Peter, against whom the gates of hell shall not prevaiie. For if that Peter in the gospel do beare the type and figure of the Christian church (as all men in a maner doe affirme) what more foolish or vaine thing can there bee, than through privat usurpation, to restraine and to bind that unto one man, which by the appoint ment of the Lord, is of it selfe free and open to so many * 2" In these so greatly troublous times, and this horrible dark- 1 To so many.] The original Latin edition, which is of good authority, and will occasionally well repay the trouble of being consulted, by those who have access to so scarce a volume, contains some sentences here, omitted in the English translation (which it is of some importance to know, was not executed by Fox himself, but, both for translation and publication, was, at least as respects the first edition, confided to other hands ; he being, at the time of the coming out of that edition in 1563, engaged elsewhere, in collect ing materials for other portions of his vast and arduous undertaking) : " Caeterarum ecclesiarum " (says he) "nihil valebant pastores, nisi quantum ab ipso permittebatur. Solus hie non ecclesiis, sed et regnis praesidebat omnibus. Solus terrori erat cunctis : caeteris Christi ministris parum aut nihil tribuebatur. Ab uno pendebant ac petebantur omnia. Nusquam erat excommunicandi jus, nusquam relaxandi autoritas, nusquam interpretandi potestas, nisi in Romana basilica. In hac igitur tanta rerum perturbatione," &c, as in the English copy. " Commentarii Rerum, &c. Basilese, 1559." Foi. p. 4. N 2 180 JOHN WICKLIFFE. nesse of ignorance, what time there seemed in a manner to be no sparke of pure doctrine left or remaining, this aforesaid Wick liffe by God's providence sprang and rose up : through whom the Lord would first waken and raise againe the world, which was overmuch drowned and whelmed in the deepe streames of human traditions. — Thus you have here the time of Wickliffe's originall. Which Wickliffe, after he had now by a long time professed divinitie 2 in the universitie of Oxford, and perceiving the true doctrine of Christ's gospell to be adulterate and defiled, with so many inventions of popes, sects of monks, and darke errours, he after long debating and deliberating with himselfe (with many secret sighes, and bewailing in his mind the generall ignorance of the whole world) could no longer suffer or abide the same, but that he at last determined with himselfe to helpe and to remedie such things as hee saw to bee wide and out of the way. But forsomuch as he saw that this dangerous medling, could not be attempted or stirred without great trouble, neither that these things which had been so long time with use and custome rooted and grafted in men's minds, could bee suddenlie plucked up or taken away, hee thought with himselfe that this matter should be done by little and little. Wherefore he taking his originall at small occasions, thereby opened himselfe a way or meane to greater matters. And first he assailed his adversaries in logical! and meta- physicall questions, disputing with them of the first forme and fashion of things, of the increase of time, and of the intelligible substance of a creature, with other such like sophemes 3 of no great effect : but yet notwithstanding they did not a little helpe and furnish him, which minded to dispute of greater matters. So in these matters first began Kegningham (a Carmelite) to dispute and argue against John Wickliffe. By these originals, the way was made unto greater points, so that at the length he came to touch the matters of the sacraments, 2 Professed divinitie.] He took the degree of D.D. in 1372. — Lewis, chap. ii. p. 21. 3 Such like sophemes.] " Hit is not inoughe for a prieste (after my judge ment) to construe a collette, to put forth a question, or to answere to a sopheme, but moche more a good, a pure, and a holy life, approved maners, metely lernynge of holye scripture, some knowlege of the sacramentes ; chiefly and above all thynge the feare of God, and love ofthe heavenly lyfe." — Dean Colet's Convocation Sermon, p. 301. Knight's edition; subjoined to his Life. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 181 and other abuses of the church. Touching which things this holy man tooke great paines, protesting (as they said) openlie in the schooles, that it was his chiefe and principall purpose and intent to revoke and call backe the church from her idolatrie to some better amendment, especially in the matter of the sacrament of the bodie and blood of Christ. — But this boil or sore could not bee touched without the great griefe and paine of the whole world. For first of all, the whole glut of monks, and begging- friers * were set on a rage or madnesse, which (even as hornets with their sharpe stings) did assaile this good man on every side. After them the priests, and then after them the archbishop took the matter in hand, being then Simon Sudburie, who for the same cause deprived him of his benefice, which then he had in 4 Begging friers.] The ecclesiastical history of these ages is full of the ambitious encroachments, the hypocrisy, and the immoralities of the men dicant orders. Their vices, which they endeavoured to hide under the cloke of extraordinary zeal and sanctity, gave many deep and lasting wounds to the interests of truth and of religion. The reader may not be displeased to see their general character well drawn by one who had studied them nearly — the learned Henry Wharton ; a man by whose premature death the ecclesiastical history of this country, and other departments of literature, sustained incal culable losses. "These mendicant orders arose and chiefly infested the church in the thirteenth age. They pretended an extraordinary call from God to reform the world, and correct the faults of the secular clergy. To this end they put on a mighty shew of zeal for the good of men's souls, and of contempt of the world : accused the secular clergy of famishing the souls of men, called them dumb dogs, and cursed hirelings : maintained that evangelical poverty became the ministers of the gospel : that it was unlawful for them to possess any thing, or to retain propriety in any worldly goods. As for the publick orders of the church, they would not be tied to them, alleging, that themselves being wholly spiritual, could not be obliged to any carnal ordinances. They broke in every where upon the parochial clergy ; usurped their office ; in all popu lous and rich places, set up altars of their own ; withdrew the people from the communion of their parish priest; would scarce allow the hopes of sal vation to any but their own disciples, whom they bewitched with great pre tences of sanctity, and assiduity in preaching. These artifices had raised their reputation and interest so high in a few years, that they wanted very little to ruin the secular clergy, and therewith the church. But in less than an age the cheat of these impostors became manifest to all men. They pro cured to their societies incredible riches, built to themselves stately palaces ; infinitely surpassed that viciousness of which themselves had (perhaps un justly) accused the secular clergy ; and long before the Reformation, became the most infamous and contemptible part of the church of Rome." — Defence of Pluralities. P. 9, 10. a.d. 1692, and 1703. Edit. 2. 182 JOHN WICKLIFFE. Oxford. — Notwithstanding, he being somewhat friended and sup ported by the king 5, as appeareth, continued, and bare out the malice of the friers, and of the archbishop all this while of his first beginning, till about the yeere of our Lord, 1377. — After which time now to prosecute likewise of his troubles and conflict, first I must fetch about a little compasse, as requisite is, to inferre some mention of John of Gaunt duke of Lancaster the king's sonne, and lord Henrie Percie °, which were his speciall maintainers. As yeeres and time grew on, king Edward the third, which had raigned now about fifty-one yeeres, after the decease of prince Edward his sonne, who departed the yeere before, was stricken in great age, and in such feeblenesse withall, that he was unweldie through lacke of strength to governe the affaires of the realme. Wherefore a parliament being called the yeere before his death, it was there put up by the knights and other the burgesses of the parliament (because of the misgovernment of the realme by certaine greedie persons about the king, raking all to themselves, without seeing any justice done) that twelve sage and discreet lords, and peeres, such as were free from note of all avarice, should be placed as tutours about the king, to have the doing and disposing under him (sixe at one time, and in their absence sixe at another) of matters pertinent to the publike regiment. These twelve governors by the parliament aforesaid being appointed to have the tuition of the king, and to attend to the publike affaires of the realme, remained for a certaine space about him, till afterward it so fell out, that they being againe removed, all the regiment of the realme next under the king, was committed to the duke of Lancaster the king's son. For as 5 Supported by the king.] In the forty-eighth year of Edward III. (a.d. 1374) Wickliffe, then reader in divinity in Oxford, was the second named in a com mission from that prince to treat with ambassadors from the pope, of matters in dispute between the realm of England and the see of Rome, respecting re stitutions of benefices and elections and confirmations of bishops. Again, in the year 1375, Nov. 6, the prebend of Aust, in the collegiate church of Westbury, Worcester diocese, was given to him by the king : and about the same time, adds Lewis (chap, hi.), " he seems to have been pre sented (by the king) to the rectory of Lutterworth, in Leicestershire."— Fox, p. 390; Lewis, chap. 3. " Lord Henrie Percie.] i. e. Henry Percy, third Lord Percy of Alnwick, and first Earl of Northumberland. He was father of Hotspur. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 183 yet Richard the sonne of prince Edward lately departed, was very young and under age. This duke of Lancaster had in his heart of long time conceived a certaine displeasure against the clergie ; whether for corrupt and impure doctrine, joyned with like abominable excesse of life, or for what other cause, it is not precisely expressed. Onely by storie the cause thereof may be gessed, to rise by William Wickam bishop of Winchester. The matter is this. The bishop of AVinchester was reported to affirme, that the aforesaid John of Gaunt duke of Lancaster, was not the sonne of king Edward, nor of the queene. Who being in travell at Gaunt, had no sonne (as he said) but a daughter ; which the same time by lying upon of the mother in the bed, was there smothered. Whereupon, the queene fearing the kings displeasure, caused a certaine manchild of a woman of Flanders (borne the very same time) to be conveied and brought unto her in stead of her daughter aforesaid, and so brought up the child whom shee bare not, who now is called duke of Lancaster. And this (said the bishop) did the queene tell him, lying in extreemes on her deathbed, under seale of confession; charging him if the said duke should ever aspire to get the crowne, or if the king- dome by any meanes should fall unto him, he then should manifest the same, and declare it to the world, that the said duke of Lancaster was no part of the kings bloud, but a false heire of the king. — This slanderous report of the wicked bishop ', seemeth to proceed of a subtill zeale toward the popes religion : for that the foresaid duke by favouring of Wickliffe, declared himselfe to be a professed enemie against the popes profession. Which thing 1 The wicked bishop.] Bishop Lowth, in his Life of William qf Wykeham (p. 143—146, edit. 2d) discards the whole of this story as altogether absurd and incredible. The D. of Lancaster, he remarks, was the seventh child ofthe king, and the fourth son, of whom only the second son and the fourth daughter died in their infancy. Can we suppose then, he asks, that the king would be very desirous of another son, or the queen under any temptation to impose one upon him ?— Without taking any part in the dispute, we may be permitted to remark, that the bishop's argument proceeds in the neglect of a part of the alleged circumstances of the case. It does not appear in the story that it was a son that the queen wished to impose, so much as a child, in lieu of that which she is said to have smothered, and in dread of the king's dis pleasure. "If a woman by negligence" (says Chaucer) "overlyeth her child in her sleeping, it is homicide and deadly sin."— Parson's Tale. P. 182. Edit. 1687. 184 JOHN WICKLIFFE. was then not unknowne, neither unmarked of the prelats and bishops then in England.— But the sequell of the storie thus followed : This slanderous report being blazed abroad, and comming to the dukes eare, he therewith being not a little discontented (as no marvell was) sought again by what meanes he could, to bee revenged of this forenamed bishop. In conclusion, the duke having now all the government of the realme under the king his father, in his owne hand, so pursued the bishop of Winchester, that by act of parliament, he was condemned and deprived of all his temporall goods, which goods were assigned to prince Richard of Burdeux, the next inheritour of the crowne after the king ; and furthermore the act inhibited the said bishop not to approach neere to the court by twenty miles. Not long after in the yeere of our Lord, 1377, a parliament was called by the meanes of the duke of Lancaster, upon certaine causes and respects ; in which parliament great request and suite was made by the clergie for the deliverance of the bishop of Winchester. At length when a subsidie was asked in the kings name of the clergie, and request also made in the kings behalfe for speedie expedition to bee made for the dissolving of the parlia ment, the archbishop therefore accordingly convented the bishops for the tractation thereof. To whom the bishops with great lamen tation complained for lacke of their fellow and brother bishop of Winton. Whose injurie, said they, did derogate to the liberties of the whole church : and therefore denied to joyne themselves in tractation of any such matters, before all the members together were united with the head : and (seeing the matter touched them all together in common, as well him as them) they would not otherwise doe : and seemed moreover to be mooved against the archbishop for that hee was not more stout in the cause, but suffered him to be cited of the duke. The archbishop although having sufficient cause to excuse himselfe, wherefore not to send for him because of the perils which might ensue thereof; yet being inforced and perswaded thereunto, by the importunitie of the bishops, directed downe his letters to the foresaid bishop of Winton, willing him to resort unto the convocation of the clergie ; who being glad to obay the same, was received with great joy of the other bishops. And at length the said Winchester was restored to his owne tempo ralities againe. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 185 As the bishops had thus sent for Winchester, the duke in the mean time had sent for John Wickliffe : who, as is said, was then the divinitie reader in Oxford, and had commenced in sundrie acts and disputations, contrary to the forme and teaching of the popes church in many things : who also for the same had been deprived of his benefice, as hath been afore touched. The opinions which he began in Oxford, first in his lectures and sermons to intreat of, and wherefore hee was deprived, were these : That the pope had no more power to excommunicate any man, than hath another. That if it bee given by any person to the pope to excommunicate, yet to absolve the same is as much in the power of another priest, as in his. He affirmed moreover, that neither the king nor any temporall lord could give any perpetuitie to the church, or to any ecclesiasticall per son : for that when such ecclesiasticall persons doe sinne, habi- tualiter, continuing in the same still, the temporall powers ought and may meritoriouslie, take away from them, that before hath been bestowed upon them. And that hee proved, to have been practised before here in England by William Rufus. Which thing (said he) if he did lawfully, why may not the same also be practised now ? if he did it unlawfully, then doth the church erre (saith hee) and doth unlawfully in praying for him. — But of his assertions more shall follow (Christ willing) hereafter. The storie which ascribeth to him these assertions being taken out of the monasterie of S. Albans, addeth withall, that in his teaching and preaching hee was very eloquent, but a dissembler (saith he) and an hypocrite. Why he surmiseth him to bee an hypocrite, the cause was this : because he and his fellowes usually accustomed in their preaching to goe barefoot, and in simple russet gownes ". By this I suppose, may sufficiently appeare to the indifferent, the nature and condition of Wickliffe, how farre it was from am bition and pride ; the slanderous penne of Polydore Virgil, re porting of him (in his nineteenth book), that because he was not preferred to higher honors and dignities of the church (con- 8 Simple russet gownes.] In the parliament of 1382, it was, with other ar ticles, objected against Wickliffe and his followers, that they taught, that "ecclesiastical men ought not to ride on such great horses, nor use so large jewels, precious garments, or delicate entertainments ; but to renounce them all, and give them to the poor, walking on foot, and taking staves in their hands, to take on them the appearance of poor men, giving others example by their conversation." — Lewis's Life, &c. p. 105. 186 JOHN WICKLIFFE. ceiving therefore indignation against the clergy) he became their mortall enemie. How true this was. He only knoweth best, that rightly shall judge both the one and the other. In the mean time, by other circumstances and parts of his life, we may con jecture what is to be thought of the man. But to return from whence we digressed. Beside these his opinions and assertions above recited, with other moe, which are hereafter to bee brought in order, hee began also then something neerelie to touch the matter of the sacrament, prooving that in the said sacrament, the accidences of bread 9 remained not without the subject, or substance, both by the holie scriptures, and also by the authoritie of the doctors, but especially by such as were most ancient. As for the latter writers, that is to say such as have written upon that argument under the thousand yeeres since Christ's time, hee utterly refused them ; saying, that after these yeeres Satan was loosed 10 and set at libertie : and that 9 Accidences of bread.] " They seyen that this sacrament is neither bread, ne Christ's body, but accidents withouten suject (subject), and there under is Christ's body. This is not taught in holy writ, but is fully agenst St. Austin, and holy saints, and reason, and wit." — "Wickliffe, in Lewis's History, p. 80. In Jewel's famous challenge at Paul's Cross, this was one ofthe articles whieh he called upon the Romanists to prove to be a doctrine of the church within the six first centuries ; " that in the sacrament, after the words of consecration there remain only the accidents and shews, without the substance of bread and wine." In his answer to this challenge Master Harding openly declares, that " in this sacrament, after consecration, nothing in substance remaineth that was before, neither bread, nor wine, but only the accidents of bread and wine, as their form and shape, savor, smell, colour, weight, and such like, which here have their being miraculously, without their subject : forasmuch as after consecration there is none other substance, than the substance of the body and blood of our Lord, which is not affected with such accidents ; which doctrine, though not with these precise terms, hath ahvays been taught and believed from the beginning." — Jewel's Reply, p. 312, 313. Edit. 1609. 10 Satan was loosed.] " Wickliffe maintained, that the loosing of Satan (Rev. xx. 1, &c.) commenced in the second millenary after Christ's ascension, and that after this loosing of him, the church notably swerved from following after Christ. Of this he gave some instances : as, the opinion that grace may be bought and sold, a3 an ox or an ass ; and as a consequence of it, making merchandize with the buying of pardons, and blotting out of sin ; the error concerning the eucharist, that it is an accident without a substance ; the giving the preference to the pope's bulls, and neglecting the Holy Scrip tures. From hence he dates the rise of the several sects of friers, whom he calls the tail of the dragon ; and compares them to the locusts which came out of the bottomless pit." — Lewis's Life, &c. p. 151. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 187 since that time the life of man hath bin most subject to and in danger of errors : that the simple and plaine truthe appeares and consists in the scriptures, whereunto all human traditions what soever they be, must be referred ; and speciallie such as are set forth and published now of late yeeres. This was the cause why he refused the latter writers of decretals, leaning onelie to the scriptures and ancient doctors; most stoutly affirming out of them, — in the sacrament of the bodie which is celebrate with bread, the accidents not to bee present without the substance : that is to say, that the bodie of Christ is not present without the bread, as the common sort of priests in those daies did dreame. As for his arguments what they were, wee will shortly at more opportunitie by God's grace, declare them in another place. — But herein the truth (as the poet speaketh very truely) had gotten John Wickliffe great displeasure and hatred at many men's hands ; and specially of the monks and richest sort of priests. Albeit, through the favour and supportation of the duke of Lan caster, and Lord Henry Percie, hee persisted hitherto in some meane quiet against their violence and crueltie : till at last, about the yeere of our Lord 1376, the bishops, still urging and inciting their archbishop Simon Sudburie, (who before had deprived him, and afterward prohibited him also to stir any more in those sorts of matters,) had obtained by processe an order of citation to have him brought before them. — Whereunto both place and time for him to appeare after their usuall forme was to him assigned. The duke having intelligence that Wickliffe his client should come before the bishops, fearing that he being but one, was too weake against such a multitude, called to him out of the orders of friers *, foure bachelers of divinitie, out of every order one, to 1 The orders of friers.] It seems strange that Wickliffe should have among his supporters, four individuals drawn from the four Mendicant Orders ; and Lewis questions the fact, accounting the thing " very improbable, as Dr. W., by detecting their frauds, superstitions and wickednesses, had made of them all his enemies." (Life, &c. p. 56.) I am not able to solve the difficulty. Still, two distinct considerations present themselves, which may perhaps in some degree extenuate it. (I.) There was much of political contention, and of struggle for professional and sectarian aggrandisement, intermixing itself in all these disputes ; and we must not forget, that in consenting to assist W. these friers were recommending themselves to the most powerful individuals in the kingdom, the D. of Lancaster, and E. Percy, the lord marshal. (2.) There existed a " bellum plusquam civile" between the religious orders and the secular clergy ; and the friers might be willing to be friends of Wickliffe because they were bitter enemies of Sudbury, Courtney and the bishops, by 188 JOHN WICKLIFFE. joyne them with Wickliffe also for more suretie. When the day was come assigned to the said Wickliffe to appeare, which day was Thursday, the nineteenth of Februarie; John Wickliffe went, accompanied with the foure friers aforesaid, and with them also the duke of Lancaster, and lord Henrie Percie, lord marshall of England, the said lord Percie also going before them to make roome and way wherewith Wickliffe should come. Thus Wickliffe (through the providence of God) being suffi ciently garded, was comming to the place where the bishops sate : whom by the way his friends animated and exhorted not to feare nor shrinke a whit at the companie of the bishops there present, who were all unlearned (said they) in respect of him ; (for so proceed the words of my foresaid author, whom I follow in this narration) neither that he should dread the concourse of the people, for they would themselves assist and defend him, in such sort as he should take no harme. With these words, and with the assistance of the nobles, Wickliffe in heart incouraged, ap- procheth to the church of S. Paul in London, where a maine prease ' of people was gathered together to heare what should be said and done. Such was there the frequencie and throng of the multitude, that the lords (for all the puissance of the high mar shall) unneth 3 with great difficultie could get way through. In- whom he was now persecuted. The "bare feet" also, and "the russet gowns," of which we have read, seem to indicate something of a tendency to alliance and conformity in external circumstances at least, between the Lollards and the begging friers. Again : we shall see below, that Repington, a partizan of Wickliffe, and a canon of Leicester, preaching at Oxford, did not scruple in his sermon to press upon his academic hearers, that "the D. of Lancaster was very earnestly affected and minded in this matter, and would that all such should be received under his protection ;" besides many things more which touched the praise and defence of Wickliffe. . . But, what if, after all, these friers were brought thither only as so many hostages for the per sonal safety and inviolability of Wickliffe ? 2 A maine prease.] A great press of people. 3 Unneth.] Hardly, with difficulty. Thus the Festival in the legend of St. Thomas Becket : " And in especyall the kinges palayes at London and at Westminster that was all lete fallen downe, betwene Easter and Wytsontide Thomas made to repayre it ayen ; for he hadde there so many werkmen of dyverse craftes, that a man sholde unnethe here his felowe speke for donnynges of strokes." Foi. 78. b. Again, of the begging friars, who travelled about the country under the pretence of raising money for building churches, &c. These bilderes wiln beggen a bag ful of whete Of a pure poor man that may onethe paye Half his rent in a yere, and half ben behynde. Pierce the Ploughman's Creed. A.D. 1653. — 4to. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 189 somuch, that the bishop of London, (whose name was William Courtney) seeing the stir that the lord marshall kept in the church among the people, speaking to the lord Percie, said ; that if hee had knowne before what maistries hee would have kept in the church, he would have stopped him out from comming there. At which words of the bishop, the duke disdaining not a little, answered to the bishop againe, and said, that hee would keep such mastrie there, though he said nay. At last, after much wrastling, they pierced through and came to our Ladies chapell, where the dukes and barons were sitting, together with the archbishops and other bishops, before whom the forsaid John Wickliffe according to the manner, stood, to know what should be laid unto him. To whom first spake the lord Percie, bidding him to sit downe, saying, that he had many things to answer to, and therefore had neede of some softer seat. But the bishop of London cast eftsoones into a furnish chafe with those words ; said, he should not sit there. Neither was it, said he, according to law or reason, that he which was cited there to appeare to answere before his ordinarie, should sit downe during the time of his answer, but should stand. Upon these words a fire began to heat and kindle betweene them, insomuch that they began to rate and to revile one the other, and the whole multi tude therewith disquieted, began to be set in a hurrey. Then the duke taking the lord Percies part, with hastie words began also to take up the bishop. To whom the bishop againe, nothing inferior in reprochful checkes and rebukes, did render and requite not only to him as good as hee brought ; but also did so farre excell him, in this railing art of scolding, that to use the words of mine author, Erubuit dux quod non potuit prcevalere litigio : " the duke blushed and was ashamed, because he could not overpasse the bishop in brawling and railing ; " and therefore fell to plaine threatning, menacing the bishop, that he would bring downe the pride not onely of him, but also of all the pre- lacie of England. And speaking moreover unto him : " Thou," (said hee) " bearest thyselfe so brag upon thy parents i, which shall not be able to helpe thee : they shall have enough to doe to help themselves." For his parents were the earle and coun- tesse of Devonshire. To whom the bishop againe answered, that 4 Thy parents.] See Gibbon's " Digression on the Family of Courtenay," at the end of the sixty-first chapter of his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. 190 JOHN WICKLIFFE. to bee bold to tell truth, his confidence was not in his parents, nor in any man else, but only in God in whom he trusted. Then the duke softly whispering in the ear of him next by him, said that he would rather plucke out the bishop by the haire of his head out of the church, then he would take this at his hand. This was not spoken so secretlie, but that the Londoners over heard him. Whereupon being set in a rage, they cried out, say ing ; that they would not suffer their bishop so contemptuouslie to be abused ; but rather they would lose their lives, then that he should so be drawne out by the haire. — Thus that councell being broken with scolding and brawling for that day, was dissolved before nine of the clocke 5. Upon the 12th day of the month of June, in the year 1377, died the worthie and victorious prince king Edward the third, after hee had raigned fifty-one yeeres. A prince no more aged in yeeres then renowned for many singular and heroicall vertues, but principally noted and lauded for his singular meeknesse and clemencie towards his subjects and inferiors, ruling them by gen- tlenesse and mercie, without all rigour or austere severitie. Among other noble and royall ornaments of his nature, worthilie and copiouslie set forth of many, thus hee is described of some, which may brieflie suffice for the comprehension of all the rest : " To the orphans hee was as a father, compatient to the afflicted, mourning with the miserable, relieving the oppressed, and to all them that wanted, an helper in time of neede : " but chiefly above all other things, in this prince to bee commemorate in my mind, is this ; that hee above all other kings of this realme, unto the time of king Henrie the eight, was the greatest brideler of the popes usurped power and outragious oppressions : during all the time of which king, neither the pope could greatly prevaile in this realme, and also John Wickliffe was maintained with favour and aid sufficient. But before we close up the storie of this king, there commeth to hand that which I thought not good to omit, a noble purpose of the king in requh-ing a view to be taken in all his dominions of all benefices and dignities ecclesiasticall remaining in the hands of Italians and aliens, with the true valuation of the same directed downe by commission ; the tenour of which commission I thought hereunder to set downe for worthie memorie. " Of the clocked] Compare Lewis's Life, chap. iv. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 191 The Tiing directed writs unto all the bishops of England in this forme. " Edward by the grace of God king, &c. To the reverend father in Christ N. by the same grace bishop of L. greeting. Being willing upon certaine causes, to bee certified what and how many benefices as well archdeaconries and other dignities, as vicarages, parsonages, prebends and chapels, within your dio- cesse, be at this present in the hands of Italians and other strangers, what they be, of what value, and how every of the said benefices be called by name : and how much every of the same is worth by the yeere, not as by way of taxe or extent, but ac cording to the true value of the same : likewise of the names of all and singuler such strangers being now incumbents or occupy ing the same and every of them : moreover the names of al them, whether Englishmen or strangers, of what state or condition soever they be, which have the occupation or disposition of any such benefices with the fruits and profits of the same, in the be- halfe or by the authority of any of the aforesaid strangers, by way of farme, or title of procuration, or by any other waies or meanes whatsoever, and how long they have occupied or disposed the same ; and withall if any the said strangers be now residents upon any benefices, wee command you, as we heretofore com manded you, that you send us a true certificat of al and singuler the premisses, into our high court of Chancerie, under your seale distincthe and openlie, on this side the feast of the ascension of our Lord next comming, without further delay ; returning unto us this our writ withall. Witnesse our selfe, at Westminster 16. day of Aprill in the 48. yeere of our raigne of England, and over France the 35. yeere." (A.D. 1374.) By vertue hereof certificat was sent up to the king into his chancery, out of every diocesse of England, of all such spirituall livings as were then in the occupation either of priors aliens, or of other strangers, whereof the number was so great 6, as being 6 The number was so greats] Even so early as the reign of Henry IIL, according to Matthew Paris, the annual amount of the benefices in the hands of Italians in this kingdom was seventy thousand marks, more than three times the value of the whole revenue of the crown. M. Paris in vit. Hen- rici IIL, ad. ann. 1252. — Fox. p. 262. Grosthed bishop of Lincoln having protested loudly against these enormities, and baffled pope Innocent IV. 192 JOHN WICKLIFFE. all set downe, would fill almost halfe a quier of paper. Wherby may appeare that it was high time for the king to seeke remedie 7 herein, either by treatie with the pope or otherwise ; considering so great a portion of the revenues of his realme was by this meanes conveied away and employed either to the releefe of his enemies, or maintenance of the forrainers ; amongst which num ber, the cardinals of the court of Rome lacked not their share ". in his design of making a like provision for one of his nephews ; the Chro niclers tell us that the pope had determined, after Grosthed's death, that his bones should be disinterred, and he condemned as a heretic. Grosthed, however, the same Chroniclers tell us, put a stop to this design, by appearing unexpectedly to the pope, reprehending him very severely, and inforcing the lecture by smiting him on the side with a vehement stroke from the butt-end of his crosier. — Matt. Par. ann. 1254. See Index, under Benefices in the hands of foreigners. — Compare also Lewis's Life, &c, chap. iii. 7 To seeke remedie.] It was with this view that the commission was appointed in this year, in which the name of Wickliffe stands second, and of which mention was made in the note above, p. 182. 8 Their share.] " But all treaties with that corrupt court signified very little : for, though it was now (a.d. 1376) agreed, that the pope should make no more use of reservation of benefices : yet we find it complained of in par liament, the very next year after the conclusion of this treaty, that the pope did make reservation of dignities elective contrary to this treaty of his, con cluded with K. Edward III. " This very same year, in which this treaty with the pope was made, a long bill was brought into the House of Parliament against the papal usurpations, as the cause of all the plagues, injuries, famine, and poverty of the realm. It was remonstrated by them (Cotton's Abridgment of Records, p. 128) that 'the tax paid to the pope of Rome for ecclesiastical dignities doth amount to five fold as much as the tax of all the profits which appertain to the king, by the year, of this whole realm; and for some one bishopric, or other dignity, the pope, by way of translation and death, hath three, four, or five several taxes ; that the brokers of that sinful city, for money, promote many caitiffs, being altogether unlearned and unworthy, to a thousand marks living yearly; whereas the learned and worthy can hardly obtain twenty marks ; whereby learning decayeth. That aliens, enemies to this land, who never saw, nor care to see their parishioners, have those livings ; whereby they despise God's service, and convey away the treasure of the realm ; and are worse than Jews or Saracens. It is therefore, say they, to be considered, that the law of the church would have such livings bestowed for charity only, without praying or paying : that reason would that livings given of devotion should be bestowed in hospitality : that God hath given his sheep to the pope to be pastured, and not shorn or shaven : that lay-patrons, perceiving this simony and covet ousness of the pope, do thereby learn to sell their own benefices to beasts, no otherwise than Christ was sold to the Jews : that there is none so rich a prince in Christendom, who hath the fourth part of so much treasure as the pope JOHN WICKLIFFE. 193 After king Edward the third, succeeded his sonnes sonne, Richard the second, being yet but young, of the age of eleven hath out of this realm, for churches, most sinfully. They further remon strated that the pope's collector and other strangers, the king's enemies, being only leiger spies for English dignities, and disclosing the secrets of the realm, ought to be discharged : that the same collector being also receiver of the pope's pence, keepeth an house in London, with clerks and officers there unto belonging, as if it were one of the king's solemn courts, transporting yearly to the pope twenty thousand marcs, and most commonly more : that cardinals and other aliens remaining at the court of Rome (whereof one cardinal is a dean of York, another of Salisbury, another of Lincoln, another archdeacon of Canterbury, another archdeacon of Durham, another arch deacon of Suffolk, and another archdeacon of York; another prebendary of Thane and Nassington ; another prebendary of York, in the diocese of York), have divers other the best dignities in England, and have sent over yearly unto them twenty thousand mares, over and above that which English brokers buying here have : that the pope, to ransom Frenchmen, the king's enemies, who defend Lombardy for him, doth always, at his pleasure, levy a subsidy of the whole clergy of England : that the pope, for more gain, maketh sundry translations of all the bishopricks, and other dignities, within the realm : that the pope's collector hath this year taken to his use the first-fruits of all benefices : that therefore it would be good to renew all the statutes against provisions from Rome, since the pope reserveth all the benefices of the world for his own proper gift, and hath, within this year, created twelve new cardinals ; so that now there are thirty, whereas there were wont to be but twelve in all ; and all the said thirty cardinals, except two or three, are the king's enemies : that the pope, in time, will give the temporal manors or dignities to the king's enemies, since he daily usurpeth upon the realm, and the king's regality : that all houses and corporations of religion, which, from the king, ought to have free elections of their heads, the pope hath now ac croached the same unto himself : that in all legatines from the pope what soever, the English heareth the charge of the legates ; and all for the good ness of our money. It also appeareth, they say, that if the money of the realm were as plentiful as ever, the collector aforesaid, with the cardinal's proctors, would soon convey away the same. For remedy whereof, they ad vise it may be provided, that no such collector or proctor do remain in England, upon pain of life and limb ; and that, on the like pain, no English man become any such collector or proctor, or remain at the court of Rome. For better information hereof, and namely, touching the pope's collector ; for that the whole clergy, being obedient to him, dare not displease him, they say, it were good that Dr. John Strensall, parson of St. Botolph's in Hol- borne, be sent for to come before the lords and commons of this parliament, who, being straitly charged, can declare much more, for that he served the same collector in house five years." It was further complained, that "by this unbridled multitude of apostolical provisions, as the pope's disposals of church-benefices by his bulls were called, the lawful patrons of the several benefices were deprived of their right of collation or presentation ; the noble VOL. I. O 194 JOHN WICKLIFFE. yeeres ; who in the same yeer of his fathers decease with great pompe and solemnitie was crowned at Westminster, an. 1377, who, following his fathers steppes, was no great disfavourer 9 of and learned natives of England would be wholly excluded from all church- preferment, however, of such as was valuable or honourable, so that, as was observed before, there would in time be a defect of council as to those matters that concern the spirituahtie, and none would be found fit to be promoted to ecclesiastical prelacies : that divine worship would be impaired, hospitalitie and alms would be neglected, contrary to the primary intention and designs of the founders of the churches : that the legal rights of the respective churches would be lost, the church buildings would all go to ruine, and the devotion of the people be lessened and withdrawn." — Lewis's Life of Wick liffe, p. 34—7. 9 No great disfavourer.] Many years before, viz. so long ago as the year 1366, and several years previously to his being raised to his doctor's degree at Oxford, Wickliffe had taken a leading part in a public concern of great moment, and such as was likely to recommend him to the favourable opinion of the crown, and to the friends of the monarchy, and of the liberties and in dependence of England. This affair it will be proper briefly to notice here, both on account of its intrinsic importance, and of the influence which it probably had on the whole of Wickliffe's future history; and also because no mention of it whatever is made in Fox's history. The general circumstances of the case may be sufficiently understood by an extract from the Parliamen tary History of England (vol. i. p. 130), already produced in a note on the Preface to his History, given above from Dr. Inett, p. 23. There it will be seen, that king Edward III. had recently received a threatening summons from the pope, to pay up the arrears of tribute claimed from Rome as due by the crown of England, in pursuance of the submission and treaty of Edward's ancestor, king John. On this, the king consults the two houses of parliament, and their counsel and advice we have in the extract above mentioned. It further appears (Lewis's Life of W., p. 19 — 21) that a monk had ventured into the field to advocate the demands of the pope ; and in so doing had maintained three distinct theses or positions. 1. The pope's right to the homage, as from the concession and grant of king John (which was the point immediately in dispute). 2. That temporal lords may in no case lawfully take away the goods of churchmen. (Quod sit falsum et pseudo-evangelicum, quod domini temporales possunt in aliquo casu legitime auferre ab ecclesiasticis bona sua.) 3. That the clergy may in no case be brought before a secular tribunal. (Quod in nullo casu licet viros ecclesiasticos coram seculari judice conveniri.) Against these positions Wickliffe takes upon himself the cha racter of respondent, alleging as a reason, or excuse, that he was in a special relation of service and duty to the crown: (ego cum sim peculiaris regis cle- ricus.) The part therefore which he assumes, it is material to observe, is a defensive one, not an offensive ; one imposed by circumstances, and not un dertaken in a speculative and innovating, much less a revolutionary temper of mind. No : the church, if we speak of it in contradistinction to the state, was the innovator, the traitor, and rebel; and his arguments and reasons JOHN WICKLIFFE. 195 the way and doctrine of Wickliffe, albeit at the first beginning, partly through the iniquitie of the time, partly through the we possess in a document under his own hand ; a copy of which is given by Lewis (Records, No. 30, p. 349 — 56), under the title, Determinatio quadam Ma- gistri Joannis Wyclyffde dominio contra unum monachum. The document in its construction is remarkable ; and its contents are highly curious and valuable. The thesis discussed, at much the greatest length, is the first above-men tioned; and the argument upon this he has conducted under the garb or disguise of a debate, which he represents to have been reported to him from the house of peers. It is as if it might have been a debate furnished by Dr. Johnson to Cave for the Gentleman's Magazine; only the speeches here given, seven in number, and short, are all on one side, that which Wickliffe himself espoused. Whether this determination was published antecedently to the actual debate mentioned in the Parliamentary History, we are not in formed. I presume it to be probable however that it was ; and in such case, it may easily be beheved to have had considerable influence on the decision of parliament. The seven speeches are so many several distinct and separate arguments why the pope's claim was to be withstood : and their united force, it cannot be doubted, is such as must have galled the pope exceedingly ; and (to say nothing of the poor monk) is more a great deal than he and his whole conclave of cardinals could have found it easy to reply to by any arguments but those of persecution. To the seventh and concluding peer that particular topic is reserved which appears of itself to have been deemed sufficient and satisfactory by the parliament ; viz. that " neither king John, nor any other king, could bring himself, his realm and people, under such sub jection, without their consent, which had not been given ; that the act was contrary to his coronation oath ; and that he was notoriously compelled to it, solely by the necessity of his affairs, and the iniquity of the times." The discussion on the other two questions is, as we have intimated, much more concise. It may be sufficient for our present purpose to say, that mainly, and in general, he rests them both on the laws, the adjudged cases, and the customs oi the realm : — that " cum jura et consuetudines Angliae affirmant licere judicibus secularibus in causa proditionis, furti, homicidii, et similibus convenire religiosos in curia regis," he who denies that this may be done* " videtur impugnare jura et consuetudines regni ;" that all the monk's alle gations and arguments to the contrary are only to be understood, " quod non licet tradere clericum ad tale examen, nisi juris casu et ordine reservatis et ob- servatis :" which he, W., not only does not deny, but affirms ; and that his own position is " quod bullae, leges et consuetudines prohibentes ablationes temporalium " from ecclesiastics, can and ought to be understood only " de ablationibus injustis." It was the same kind of argument that he maintained not unfrequently in his Enghsh writings. "If they say that secular men schulde not judge clerks, however they have done, since thei have proper juges as popes and bischopes, and other juges under them; wel I woot" (con tinues W.) " that men were wont by jugement of Yngland to dampne prestis and clerkis for robberie and thefte, and also for traiterie, and for other smale trespas ; — and gif thei now denye this, thei denye the regalia." (Lewis, p. 153.) o 2 196 JOHN WICKLIFFE. popes letters, hee could not doe that hee would. Notwith standing something he did in that behalfe, more perhaps then in " Men wondren why they cursen the king and his true officers, that for felony, or debt, or eschet taken his (the priest's) goods against the will of a false priest and traitour, and taken no heed whether they dun this by processe of law or else by extortion or tirantrie. Thei saiden at London, that it is errour to seie that secular lords may, at their doom, take temporal goods fro the church that trespasseth by long custom. If this be errour, then the king and secular lords may take no farthing ne farthing worth fro a worldly clerk, though he owe him and his liege men never so much goods, and maye well paye it, and woll not. And thus the kinge shall be cursed, if he do righteousness, and bring a Sathanas out of his old sin and theft, which the king is bounded for to do by God's own word." (Lewis, p. 122.) This whole proceeding, it cannot be doubted, if it did not first occasion, did at least further greatly inflame the hostility of the dignified ecclesiastics, and of the regular orders, against Wickliffe. They would not fail to cry out against him as a traitor to the rights of holy church. And it is very material to observe, that we possess in this discussion the germ and even the substance of several of those articles (and some which are among those that to modern ears sound the most harshly), which many years after were gathered together, and objected by them against Wickliffe : circumstances, therefore, these are which ought in justice to be borne in mind, when we shall come hereafter to consider any of those articles, under the naked and abstract forms in which they were subsequently propounded against him by his adversaries. The true meaning can only be obtained by adverting to the controversies of the times, and the real aim and objects of the two contending parties. Mean while I must content myself with asking, Is there any thing to be found fault with in W. undertaking to answer the monk on all or any of those three questions above enumerated ; or in the light in which he appears to have viewed them ; and in the arguments by which he seems to have sustained his cause ? On the contrary, does not the part taken by him justify us in re garding him as a true friend of his country, a sound politician, a wise philo sopher, and a sober and enlightened Christian ? But the condition into which the kingdom, or rather the whole of Christen dom was thrown, by the monstrous ambition of the popes, produced things much more serious than such a controversy as the preceding. Pope Boniface the eighth, for example, about the year 1300, and in the reign of king Edward I., issued a bull, in which, under pain of excommunication, ipso facto, he forbade the clergy to give, lend, or promise to the king any gift, tribute, subsidy, tallage, or other payment whatsoever ; and the laity of all ranks under hke penalties, the universities also under interdict, he prohibited from enforcing, assisting, or in any way abetting and aiding in the collection of the same ; and then he proceeds to exempt and discharge all ecclesiastics from all subjection in regard to such payments and tallages, " for the behoof of the prince and his affairs," for ever.— (Fox's Acts, p. 320.) And are we now to wonder, that such an edict was replied to by the king by reprisals of confiscation on the goods of Peckham, archbishop of Canterbury, being found JOHN WICKLIFFE. 197 the end he had thanke for of the papists, as more (by the grace of Christ) shall appeare. But as times do change, so changeth commonly the case and state of man. The bishops now seeing the aged king to be taken away, during the time of whose old age all the government of the realme depended upon the duke of Lancaster ; and seeing the said duke, with the lord Percie, the lord marshall, to give over their offices, and to remaine in their privat houses without intermedling, thought now the time to serve them, to have some vantage against John Wickliffe, who hitherto, under the pro tection of the foresaid duke and lord marshall, had some rest and quiet. Accordingly, the next yeere following, which was the yeere of our Lord 1378, being the first yeere of king Richard the second I0 ; the said pope Gregorie, taking his time after the more stubborn than the rest, and an inciter of others of the clergy against the king, and for the pope ? — But, when things of this kind are taking place, what can we say, but that the country is in a state of actual civil war, with two rival princes contending for the crown ; one, a proud priest at Rome, bearing in his hands chains for the whole high-minded people of England (as they ought to have been), and on his lips nothing but threats, tremendous threats of perdition, temporal and eternal, unless they will tamely bow their necks, and yield themselves hand and foot to receive the chains which he wields over them ; while, on the other side, we have the native and rightful sovereign, an Edward (it may be) or an Henry, the conqueror of kingdoms, the pride of chivalry, the victor at Crecy or Azincour, and the champion in a hundred battles ? What wonder, then, that in such a condition of affairs, all shall feel that parts must be taken, and that they cannot but declare for one side or the other, in a crisis, when every thing that can be valuable to man kind is at stake ? And shall it be believed, that all the clergy of England will arrange themselves under the banner of usurpation, and tyranny, and despotism ? The thing is impossible. No. The clergy, as became them, with Wickliffe and others in the front, were among the first to wage the war of genuine freedom, intellectual, moral, civil, and religious, in behalf of themselves and their lay fellow-countrymen. But, without dwelling on that most important part of the subject, at any rate am I not entitled to allege, that in looking back to consider and estimate the literary remains and contro versies of those days, those awful circumstances are not to be overlooked out of which they sprang, and with which they are intimately involved ; and to intercede for some little allowance and indulgence, if we happen to meet with an occasional exorbitancy in some of the topics of argument, or in the heat and vehemence in which, at times, they may appear to be enforced ? 10 Richard the second.] Fox mistakes both the year in which these bulls were dispatched, and the reigning prince. The date ought to be 1 377 ; and the king was Edward III., as appears beyond dispute, from Wilkins's Concil. 198 JOHN WICKLIFFE. death of king Edward, sends his bull by the hands and meanes of one master Edmund Stafford, directed unto the universitie of Oxford, rebuking them sharplie, imperiouslie, and like a pope, for suffering so long the doctrine of John Wickliffe to take root, and not plucking it up with the crooked sickle of their catholic doctrine. Which bull when it came to be exhibited unto their hands, by the popes messenger aforesaid, the proctors and masters of the universitie joyning together in consultation, stood long in doubt, deliberating with themselves, whether to receive the popes bull with honour, or to refuse and reject it with shame. I cannot here but laugh in my mind to behold the authors ' of this storie whom I follow : what exclamations, what wondrings and marvels, they make at these Oxford men, for so doubting at a matter so plaine, so manifest of it selfe, (as they say) whether the popes bull sent to them from Rome was to be received, or contrarie. Which thing to our monkish writers seemed then such a prodigious wonder, that they with blushing cheekes are faine to cut off the matter in the middest with silence. The copie of this wild bull 2, sent to them from the pope, was this. " Gregorie the bishop, the servant of Gods servants, to his wel- beloved sonnes, the chancellour and universitie of Oxford, in the diocesse of Lincolne, greeting, and apostolicall benediction. " We are compelled not only to marvel, but also to lament that you, considering the apostolicall seate hath given unto your university at Oxford so great favour and priviledge, and also for that you flow as in a large sea in the knowledge of the holy Scriptures, and ought to be champions and defenders of the ancient and catholike faith (without the which there is no salva tion,) by your great negligence and sloth, will suffer wild cockle, not only to grow up among the pure wheate of the florishing field of your university, but also to waxe more strong and choke the corne. Neither have ye any care (as wee are informed) to vol. iii. p. 118. The same mistake is repeated again, and defended, below. Edward died June 21, 1377; but this could not be known at Rome at the date of the bull. 1 The authors.] Walsingham Hist. Ang. p. 200. edit. 1574. 2 This wild bull.] See Lewis's Life of Wickliffe, c. iv., and Records, No. xii. ; which exhibits the bull in the original Latin. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 199 extirpe and plucke the same up by the rootes, to the great blemishing of your renoumed name, the perill of your soules, the contempt of the church of Rome, and to the great decay of the ancient faith. And further (which grieveth us) the encrease of that filthie weed was more sharpely rebuked and judged of in Rome then in England, where it sprang. Wherefore let there be meanes sought by the helpe of the faithfull, to roote out the same. " Grievously it is come to our ears, that one John Wickliffe, parson of Lutterworth in Lincolne dioces, a professour of divinitie (would God he were not rather a master of errours) is runne into a kind of detestible wickednesse, not onely and openly pub lishing, but also vomiting out of the filthy dungeon of his breast, divers professions, false and erroneous conclusions, and most wicked and damnable heresies, whereby he might defile the faithfull sort, and bring them from the right path headlong into the way of perdition, overthrow the state of the church, and utterly subvert the secular policie. Of which his mischievous heresies, some seeme to agree (onely certaine names and tearmes changed) with the perverse opinions, and unlearned doctrine of Marsilius of Padua, and John of Gandune 3, of unworthie memorie, whose bookes were utterly abolished in the realme of England, by our 3 Marsilius . . . and John.] Marsilius Mainardinus of Padua, and Johannes de Gandavo [Ghent], or, as some call him, de Janduno (see Wharton's App. to Cave's Hist . Literaria), were two of the most noted writers on the Guelph and Ghibelline controversy. They were of the latter party, and strenuously supported the cause of the emperor Louis of Bavaria against the pope. Their various works have been printed several times in a separate form, and by Gol- dastus in his Monorchia Imperii, to which work and to the treatise of Marc Antonio de Dominis De Potestate Ecclesiastica, the reader, who wishes for more information on this subject, is referred. For Fox's account of Marsilius and John, see his Acts, p. 350. In the year 1535, the obnoxious work of Marsilius, intitled Defensor Pads, was translated and published in English, in justification of the proceedings of Henry VIII. against the pope, by William Marshall, under the title of The Defence of Peace, &c. foi. It was published by the authority of Henry, and it has on the title-page a large wood-cut of his arms, joined or impaled with those of Anne Boleyn. A work of William Ockam, intitled Defensorium contra Errores Johan- nis Papa XXII. has been sometimes mistaken for that of Marsilius. Ock- am's work is printed in Orthuinus Gratius' Fasciculus Rerum Expetendarum, &c, ed. Edw. Brown, vol. ii. p. 439, &c. 200 JOHN WICKLIFFE. predecessor of happie memorie John twenty-two 4. Which king- dome doth not only flourish in power, and abundance of faculties, but is much more glorious and shining in purenesse of faith ; accustomed alwaies to bring forth men excellently learned in the true knowledge of the holy Scriptures, ripe in gravitie of maners, men notable in devotion, and defenders of the catholike faith. Wherefore wee will and command you by our writing apostolicall, in the name of your obedience, and upon paine of privation of our favour, indulgences and priviledges, granted unto you and your universitie, from the said see apostolicall ; that hereafter ye suffer not those pestilent heresies, those subtill and false con- elusions and propositions, misconstruing the right sense of faith and good workes (howsoever they tearme it, or what curious implication of words soever they use) any longer to be disputed of, or brought in question : lest if it be not withstood at the first, and plucked up by the roots, it might perhaps be too late hereafter to prepare medicines, when a greater number is infected with the contagion. And further, that yee apprehend imme diately or cause to be apprehended the said John Wickliffe, and deliver him to be detained in the safe custodie of our welbeloved brethren, the archbishop of Canterburie, and the bishop of London, or either of them. And if you shall find any gaine-sayers, cor rupted with the said doctrine (which God forbid) in your said universitie within your jurisdiction, that shall obstinately stand in the said errours : that then in like maner yee apprehend them, and commit them to safe custodie ; and otherwise to doe in this case as it shall appertaine unto you : so as by your carefull proceedings herein, your negligence past concerning the pre misses, may now fully be supplied and recompensed with present diligence : — whereby you shall not onely purchase unto you the favour and benevolence of the seat apostolicall, but also great reward and merit of almightie God. " Given at Rome at S. Maries the greater, xj. Kalends of June, and in the seventh yeare of our consecration." Beside this bull sent to the universitie of Oxford, the said pope Gregorie directed moreover his letters the same time to the 1 John twenty-two.] In the Extravagant which begins Licet intra doctrinam apostoli, issued in 1327. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 201 archbishop of Canturbury Simon Sudburie, and to the bishop of London named William Courtney, with the conclusions of John Wickliffe therein inclosed, commanding them, by vertue of those his letters 5 apostolicall, and straitly injoyning them to cause the said John Wickliffe to be apprehended, and cast into prison : and that the king and the nobles of England should be admon ished by them, not to give any credit to the said John Wickliffe, or to his doctrine in any wise. Beside this bill or bull of the pope, sent unto the archbishop of Canturbury and to the bishop of London, bearing the date, 11 Calend Jun. and the 7. yeare of the reigne of the pope, I find moreover in the said storie, two other letters 6 of the pope concerning the same matter, but differing in forme, sent unto the same bishops, and all bearing the same date both of the day, yeare, and moneth of the reigne of the said pope Gregory. Whereby it is to be supposed, that the pope either was very exquisite and solicitous about the matter, to have Wickliffe to be apprehended, which wrote three different divers letters to one person, and all in one day, about one businesse ; or else that hee did suspect the bearers thereof; — the scruple whereof I leave to the judgement of the reader. Furthermore, beside these letters written to the university, and to the bishops, he directeth also another epistle bearing the same date unto king Edward ; as one of my stories saith, but as an other saith, to K. Richard, which soundeth more neere to the truth, forasmuch as in the seventh yeare of pope Gregorie the xi. which was the yeare of our Lord, 1378. king Edward was not alive. The copie of his letters to the king here followeth ?. " Unto his well beloved son in Christ, Richard the most noble king of England, health, &c. " The kingdome of England which the Most Highest hath put 6 Those his letters.] This letter is printed in Wilkins's Concilia, vol. iii. p. 116, 117, from Sudbury's Register; and in Lewis's Life of Wickliffe. Records, No. 13. 6 Two other letters.] These also are printed by Wilkins, p. 117, 118; and in Lewis, see chap, iv., and Records, Nos. 14 and 15. In consequence ofthe former of these letters, a dispatch was directed from the archbishop and the bishop of London, bearing date 5 Calend. Januar. to the chancellor of the university of Oxford, commanding him to cite Wickliffe to appear at St. Paul's, London, before the archbishop and bishop, or their delegates. — Wilkins, vol. viii. p. 123, 124. 7 Here followeth.] Lewis, &c. Records, No. 16. 202 JOHN WICKLIFFE. under your power and governance, being so famous and renoumed in valiancie and strength, so abundant and flowing in all kind of wealth and riches ; but much more glorious, resplendent and shining through the brightnesse and cleerenesse of all godlinesse and faith, hath accustomed alwaies to bring forth men endued with the true knowledge and understanding of the holy Scrip tures, grave in yeares, fervent in devotion, and defenders of the catholike faith : the which have not onely directed and instructed their owne people, but strangers also, through their wholesome doctrine and precepts into the true path of God's commandments ; — but we have heard by the report and information of many credible persons (to our great greefe and heart sorrow) that John Wickliffe, parson of Lutterworth, in the diocesee of Lincolne, professor of divinitie (I would to God hee were no author of heresie) is fallen into such a detestable and abominable madnesse, that he hath propounded and set forth divers and sundrie con clusions full of errors, and containing most manifest heresie, the which doe tend utterly to subvert and overthrow the state of the whole church. Of the which, some of them (albeit under coloured phrase and speech) seem to smel and savor of perverse opinions, and the foolish doctrine of condemned memorie of Marsilius of Padua, and John of Ganduno, whose bookes were by pope John the 22, our predecessor, a man of most happie memorie, reproved and condemned, &c." Hitherto gentle reader, thou hast heard how Wickliffe was accused by the bishop. Now you shall also heare the popes mightie reasons and arguments, by the which hee did confute him, to the king. It followeth. " Therefore, forsomuch as our reverend brethren, the arch bishop of Canturburie, and the bishop of London, have received a speciall commandement from us by our authoritie, to apprehend and commit the forenamed John Wickliffe unto prison, and to transport his confession unto us : if they shall seeme in the prosecution of this their businesse to lacke your favor or helpe, we require and most earnestly desire your majestie, even as your most noble predecessors have alwaies beene most earnest lovers of the Catholike faith (whose case or quarrel in this matter is chieflie handled), that you would vouchsafe even for the reverence of God, and the faith aforesaid, and also of the apostolike seate, and of our person, that you will with your helpe and favour, assist the said archbishop and all other that shall goe about to execute JOHN WICKLIFFE. 203 the said businesse :— whereby besides the praise of men, you shall obtaine a heavenly reward and great favour and good will at our hand, and of the see aforesaid. Dated at Rome at S. Mary the greater, the 11. Kalend. of June, in the seventh yeare of our bishoprike." The articles 8 included in the popes letters which hee sent to the bishops, and to the king against Wickliffe, were these as in order they do follow. " The conclusions 9 of lohn Wickliffe, exhibited in the convocation of certaine bishops at Lambeth. "All the whole race of mankind here on earth, besides Christ, hath no power simplie, to ordaine that Peter and all his offspring should politickelie rule over the world for ever. " 2. God cannot give to any man for him and his heirs any civil dominion for ever. " 3. All writings invented by men, as touching perpetual heritage, are impossible'. 8 The articles.] "By the copies of them yet remaining, it appears that these articles, though they were generally the same as to the matter, were yet reported to the pope in different forms." — Lewis's Life, &c. p. 46. 9 The conclusions.] See Lewis's Records, Nos. 18 and 40. Also, Life, Sec. p. 59 — &7, and 67 — 78. Several of these articles (and of the twenty- three more, given a few pages below), probably, will startle the reader ; and it will not be thought, that the apology made for Wickliffe by Fox at the beginning (" In whose opinions, albeit, some blemishes perhaps may be noted,") is at all too much for the occasion, even if it be sufficient. Partly, however, it is to be borne in mind, that the articles come to us from the hands of Wickliffe's adversaries ; but much more, that we have them here in the text, in their naked and abstract form, without the limitations and explanations which con clusions, so concisely expressed, plainly demand ; and through aid of which we have evidence enough to show, that Wickliffe himself maintained and vindicated them. And, while it is to be regretted, that, unluckily, nothing of these explanations is to be found, where, from the peculiar nature and the extensive influence of the work, they were most wanted, in Fox's English editions, I may mention, that we have them pretty much at large in the Latin copy (p. 8 — 12), and still at greater extent in the valuable Life by Lewis (p. 58 — 78), and in his Collection of Records, No. 40. (p. 382—9.) — Some small portion of these, with few additional particulars derived from other sources, will here be subjoined, on some of the articles, in justice to the reader, and to the memory of this great man. 1 Are impossible.] Art. 1 — 3. and Art. 4. With respect to the three first arti cles, Wickliffe asserts (Lewis, p. 60), that, as we are bound by our creed to 204 JOHN WICKLIFFE. " 4. Every man being in grace justifying2, hath not onely right unto, but also for his time hath indeed all the good things of God. " 5. A man can but only ministratoriouslie give any temporall or continuall gift, either to his naturall son, or to his son by imitation d. believe, that Jesus Christ shall " come again from heaven, to judge the quick and the dead," and that no human right can hinder the coming of Christ to the last judgment ; hence it follows, that no power of Peter and his succes sors, or of any other earthly potentate, can be maintained in any sense which shall be inconsistent with that grand event and doctrine : and when further, according to the Scriptures, all human polity shall be at an end. — Hence he affirms, that his drift was, by these " three first conclusions, to impress on worldly men the faith of Christ, that they be not drowned in the sea of a world which passes away with the lust thereof," p. 69. " Tres ergo primae conclusiones imprimunt mundialibus fidem Christi, ne submergantur in pelago seculi transeuntis cum concupiscentia ejus," p. 383. The fourth, he adds, was " to draw men to love the Lord, who has loved us to the gift and grant of so many and so great true riches." " Et quarta allicit hominem ad amorem Domini, qui dilexit nos ad tot veras divitias," p. 383. And the enjoyments of these he limits (with St. Augustine) to the next world. " The truth promises this to those Christians who enter into his joy. The right ofthe communion of saints, in their own country, is founded on the universality of the good things of God." — Lewis, p. 61, 62. 2 In grace justifying/] This conclusion, which the pope wished to fix upon Wickliffe, is designed to express the doctrine which, in subsequent times, made a much greater figure in the church ; namely, that dominion is founded in grace. But Lewis assures us, that this was no tenet of Wickliffe's. His tory, p. 115 — 117. p. 342. See also Lewis's Brief History of Anabaptism, p. 20. a.d. 1738 ; and Fox's Acts, p. 398. " The papists do impute this opinion to Wickliffe and Hus, and their followers ; and condemn the opinion, and them for it as heretics, as saying that dominium fundatur in gratia : which is a manifest calumny, and no just or proved accusation ; as might be proved out of Hus's printed works, and from several manuscript works of Wickliffe in Bodley's Library. But they bring these lying accusations against them, that they may have some pretence to destroy and murder them." The above is from the text of " Several miscellaneous and weighty Cases of Conscience, 1 692," 8vo., by the very learned Dr. Thomas Barlow, bishop of Lincoln, who had himself been many years librarian ofthe Bodleian. The remainder ofthe Case is a very interesting and learned argument, to show that the obnoxious tenet was, in truth, maintained and acted upon, to a fearful degree, by the Roman Catholics themselves. 3 By imitation.] That no human being can give except only ministerially, " is plain," says W., " from hence, that every man ought to acknowledge himself in all his works an humble minister of God, as is evident from Scripture : let a man so account of us as ofthe ministers of Christ. Nay, Christ himself so JOHN WICKLIFFE. 205 " 6. If God be, the temporall lords may lawfully and mere- toriouslie take away the riches from the church when they doe offend habitualiter \ " 7. We know that 5 Christs vicar cannot, neither is able by his buls, neither by his owne will and consent, neither by the consent of his college, neither to make able or disable any man6. " 8. A man cannot be excommunicated to his hurt or undoing, except he be first and principally excommunicate by himselfe. " 9. No man ought, but in Gods cause alone, to excom- municat, suspend, or forbid, or otherwise to proceed to revenge by any ecclesiasticall censure. ministered, and taught his apostles so to minister." — Lewis, p. 62. "Let not his vicar therefore be ashamed to execute the ministry of the church ; since he is, or ought to be, the servant of the servants of God." — Ibid. p. 69. " Non ergo erubescat ejus vicarius fungi ministerio ecclesiae, cum sit, vel esse debet, servus servorum Domini," p. 383. 4 Offend habitualiter.] " Yet I said that it is not lawful to do this but by the authority ofthe church, in case of the defection of the spiritual president ; and when an ecclesiastic shall need to be corrected, by those who are worthy of such a trust." — Lewis, p. 70. "Dixi tamen quod hoc non licet facere nisi auctoritate ecclesim in defectu spiritualis praepositi ; et in casu quo eccle- siasticus corripiendus fuerit a fide dignis," p. 384. " But God forbid that it should be believed it was my meaning that secular lords may lawfully take away the goods of fortune from a delinquent church, when and howsoever they please ; but that they may only do it by the authority of the church, in cases and form limited by law," p. 62. " But after the death of the delinquent, let it return to the successor." " Post mortem vero clerici ad successorem revertatur," p. 387. 6 We know that.] Between this and the preceding conclusion, there stands in Sudbury's Register (Wilkins, vol. iii. p. 123) another article, which perhaps was by mistake left out in Fox's transcript. It is as follows, according to Lewis's translation : " VII. Whether the church be in such a state or not is not my business to examine, but the business of temporal lords : who, if they find it in such a state, are to act boldly, and on the penalty of damnation to take away its tem poralities." — Lewis's History, p. 43. 6 Disable any man.] " This article," says W., " is plain from the principles of the Cathohc faith. For it behoves our Lord in every operation to maintain the primacy : therefore, as in every qualifying of a subject, it is first required that the subject to be qualified be meet and worthy ; so in every disqualification there is first required a deserving from some demerit of the person to be dis qualified: and, by consequence, such a qualifying or disqualifying is not made purely by the ministry of the vicar of Christ, but from above ; from elsewhere, or from some other."— Lewis, p. 63. Compare also p. 70 and p. 384. 206 JOHN WICKLIFFE. " 10. A curse or excommunication do not simply bind, but in case it be pronounced and given out against the adversary of Gods law. "11. There is no power given by any example, either by Christ or by his apostle, to excommunicate any subject, especially for denying of any temporalities, but rather contrariwise 7. " 12. The disciples of Christ, have no power to exact by any civil authoritie, temporalties by censures 3. " 13. It is not possible by the absolute power of God, that if the pope, or any other Christian doe pretend by any meanes to bind or to loose, that thereby he doth so bind and loose 9. " 14. We ought to beleeve that the vicar of Christ, doth at such times onely bind and loose, when as he worketh con- formablie by the law and ordinance of Christ. "15. This ought universally to bee beleeved, that every priest ' rightly and duly ordered, according unto the law of grace, hath 7 But rather contrariwise^] " This article is proved hence ; from what Christ teacheth, that the honour of God, and the profit of the Church, is to be preferred before any personal interest, or the denial of temporal things. — And the second part (contrariwise) is proved by that of Luke ix., where he forbade his disciples, who desired fire to come down from heaven, to excom municate unbelievers who unjustly detained from Christ and his disciples their goods. Ye know not, says he, what spirit ye are of. From whence the Catholic conclusion is that it is not lawful for the vicar of Christ to excommu nicate his neighbour, unless on account of love, with which he is to be more affected than with all the temporalities of this world." — Lewis, p, 72. Com pare p. 386 and p. 64. 8 By censures.] "This is plain from Scripture, Luke xxii. where Christ forbade his disciples to reign civilly, or to exercise any temporal dominion ; the kings ofthe Gentiles exercise lordship over them, but ye shall not be so. . . . We add to this twelfth conclusion, notwithstanding, that temporalities may be exacted by ecclesiastical censures, accessione ; in vindication of God." Lewis, p. 64. Compare p. 386, and p. 72, 3. 0 So bind and loose.] "The opposite of this would destroy the whole catholic faith ; since it imports no less than blasphemy, to suppose any one to usurp such an absolute power of the Lord's. I add to this 13th conclusion, that I do not intend by it to derogate from the power of the pope, or of any other prelate of the church ; but do allow that they may, in virtue of the Head, bind and loose : only, that it cannot be that the pope or any other prelate shall pretend that he binds or looses at any rate (or just as he lists)." — Lewis, p. 64, 5. Compare also p. 73, and p. 386, 7. 1 That every priest.] "This is proved from hence, that the powers of orders are equal in all Christian priests, as is declared by Hugo, chap. 2. De Sacra- mentis." — Lewis, p. 73 and p. 387. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 207 power according to his vocation, whereby he may minister the sacraments, and consequently absolve any man confessing his fault, being contrite and penitent for the same. " 16. It is lawful for kings (in causes licensed by the law) to take away the temporalties from the spiritualtie, sinning habitu aliter 2, that is, which continue in the custome of sin, and will not amend. " 17. Whether they be temporall lords, or any other men whatsoever they be, which have endowed any church with tempo ralties ; it is lawful for them to take away the same temporalties, as it were by way of medicine, for to avoide sin3, notwithstanding 2 Sinning habitualiter.] What shall we think of a case such as the follow ing ? Henry III. passing into Wales in the year 1264, and visiting Hereford, finds there, as we learn from his own letter of remonstrance addressed to the bishop, "to his great grief, a church destitute of a pastor's comfort; as having neither bishop nor official, vicar nor dean, to exercise any spiritual function and dutie in the same." — Was not this a " delinquent church " in deed ? And are we to wonder that the monarch should go on to injoin the bishop, and the other members of that body, all other pleas and engagments set aside, to return thither with all speed, personally to execute the pastoral charge committed to them ? So, in default thereof, are we to wonder, that he should proceed to threaten, " if you have not a care to doe this, we will whollie take into our owne hands all the temporal goods, and whatsoever else doth belong unto the baronie of the same church ; which goods, for spiritual exercise therein, it is certain our progenitors, of a godlie devotion, did be- stowe thereupon. And such goods we will seize upon ; and will suffer no longer, that he shall reape temporal things, which feareth not unreverentlie to withdraw and keep back the spiritual things, whereunto by office and dutie he is bound." Fox's Acts, p. 305. 3 For to avoide sin.] " This is proved from hence ; that the condition, by itself consequent to the donation of the goods of the church is, that God may be honoured, and the church edified. Which condition, if it be wanting, and the opposite be found in its room, it is plain (patet) that the title of the dona tion is lost, and by consequence, that the Lord, who is the giver of the alms, ought to rectify the error. — And excommunication ought not to hinder the doing of justice ; because, if so, the clerk, by excommunication, in way of reparation might get the whole world." — Lewis, p. 75. Compare p. 388. " We add to this 17th article. God forbid that by these words, occasion should be given to the temporal lords, to take away the goods of fortune to the detriment of the church." — Lewis, p. 66. Of the whole body of these articles he declares, at the opening of one of his two papers of explanation, " I understand the conclusions according to the sense of scripture and the holy doctors, and the manner of speaking used by them ; which verse I am ready to explain, and if it be proved that the conclusions are contrary to the faith, I am willing very readily to retract 208 JOHN WICKLIFFE. any excommunication or other ecclesiastical censure, forsomuch as they are not given but under a condition *. " 18. An ecclesiasticall minister, and also the bishop of Rome may lawfully be rebuked of his subjects, and, for the profit of the church, be accused either of the clergie or of the laity." These letters, with the articles inclosed, being thus received from the pope, the bishops tooke no little heart, thinking and fully determining with themselves, and that in open profession before their provinciall councill, that all respects of feare or favour set apart, no person neither high nor low, should let them, neither would they be seduced by the intreatie of any man, nor by any threatnings or rewards, but that in this cause they would execute most strict and rigid justice s ; yea albeit present danger of life should follow thereupon. — But these so fierce brags, and stout promises, with the sub till practices of these bishops, which thought them so sure before, the Lord (against whom no deter mination of mans counsell can prevaile) by a small occasion, did lightly 6 confound and overthrow. For the day of the examina tion being come, a certaine personage of the princes court, and yet of no great noble birth, named Lewes Clifford, entring in among the bishops, commanded them that they should not pro ceed with any diffinitive sentence against John Wickliffe. With which words all they were so amazed and their combes so cut, them."— Lewis, p. 60. And at the close of the other copy, it is added, " Has sunt conclusiones quas vult etiam usque ad mortem defendere, ut per hoc valeat mores ecclesiai reformare," p. 389. 4 Under a condition.] "And as anentis" (concerning) "taking away of tem poralities : I say thus, that it is lawful to kings, to princes, to dukes, and to lords of the world, to take away from popes, from cardinals, from bishops, prelates, and possessioners in the church, their temporalities, and their almes, that they have given them upon condition that they, shoulden serve God the better, when they verily seene that their giving and taking beene contrarie to the law of God, contrarie to Christ's living, and his apostles." Process against W. Swinderby. Fox, p. 434. See also Kennet's Case of Impropria tions, p. 114-15. 6 Rigid justice.] Strictam rigidamque justitiam. Latin edit. 6 Did lightly.] Did easily confound. Thus, Whytford's Pype of Perfection, foi. 76. "In suche thyngs as the subjects done knowe well ben directely agaynest the rule of theyr profession, shulde they nat lyghtly and gladly obey : lyhtely, I mean, without deliberation : and gladly, for self-pleasure or com- moditie." JOHN WICKLIFFE. 209 that (as in the storie is mentioned) they became so mute and speechlesse, as men having not one word in their mouthes to an swere. — And thus by the wondrous worke of God's providence, escaped John Wickliffe the second time out of the bishops hands. Moreover, here is not to be passed over, how at the same time, and in the said chapell of the archbishop at Lambeth, where the bishops were sitting upon John Wickliffe, the storie writing 1 of the doing thereof, addeth these words : " Not onely the citizens of London, but also the vile abjects of the citie, presumed to be so bold in the same chapell at Lambeth, where the bishops were sitting upon J. Wickliffe, both to entreate for him, and also to let and stop the same matter, trusting, as I suppose, upon the negligence which they saw before in the bishops." Thus John Wickliffe, through the favour and diligence of the Londoners, either shifted off the bishops, or else satisfied them so, that for that time he was dismissed and scaped clearly away ; onely being charged and commanded by the said bishops, that hee should not teach or preach any such doctrine any more, for the offence of the laie people. Thus this good man being escaped from the bishops with this charge aforesaid, yet notwithstanding ceased not to proceed in his godly purpose, labouring and profiting still in the church as he had begun. Unto whom (as it happeneth by the providence of God) this was also a great helpe and stay, that in the same yeere, or in the beginning of the next yeare following, the foresaid pope Gregorie xi. which was the stirrer up of al this trouble against him, turned up his heels and died 8. After whom ensued such a schisme in Rome, betweene two popes, and other succeeding them, one stir ring against another, that the schisme thereof endured the space of xxxix yeares, untill the time of the councell of Constance. The occasioner of which schisme first was pope Urban the 6, who in the first beginning of his popedome was so proud and inso lent to his cardinals, and other, as to dukes, princes, and queenes, and so set to advance his nephew and kindred, with injuries to other princes, that the greatest number of his cardinals and 7 The storie writing.] Thom. Walsingham, p. 206. s And died.] Some authorities fix his death to the 27th, others to the 28th day of March, a.d. 1378. vol. i. p 210 JOHN WICKLIFFE. courtiers by little and little shrunke from him, and set up an other French pope against him, named Clement, who reigned xi yeares. And after him Benedictus the xiii, who reigned yeares 26. Againe of the contrarie side after Urbanus vi, succeeded Boniface ix, Innocentius viii, Gregorius the xii, Alexander v, John xxiii. As touching this pestilent and most miserable schisme, it would require heere another Iliade to comprehend in order all the circumstances and tragicall parts thereof, what trouble in the whole church, what parts taken in every countrey, what appre hending and imprisoning of priests and prelates, taken by land and sea, what shedding of blood did follow thereof : how Ottho 9, duke of Brunswicke and prince of Tarentum, was taken and murthered 1 : how Joan, queene of Jerusalem and Sicilia, his wife, who before had sent to pope Urban, beside other gifts at his co ronation, forty thousand duckets in pure gold, after by the said Urban 2 was committed to prison, and in the same prison stran gled : what cardinals were racked, and miserablie without all mercy tormented on gibbets to death, what slaughter of men, what battles were fought betweene the two popes, whereof 5000. on the one side were slaine, beside the number of them which were taken prisoners : of the beheading of five cardinals together after long torments ; and how the bishop Aquilonensis ", being suspected of pope Urban for not riding faster with the pope, his horse being not good, was there slaine by the popes commande- ment, sending his souldiers unto him, to slay him, and cut him in pieces. — All which things, with other divers moe acts of horrible cruelty, happening in the time of this abominable schisme, be cause they are abundantly discoursed at full by Theodoricke Niem *, who was neere to the said pope Urban, and present at all his doings ; therefore as a thing needless, I here pretermit 5, re- 9 How Ottho.] Otho of Brunswick, son of Henry the Grecian, duke of Brunswick-Grubenhagen, was the fourth husband of Joanna, queen of Naples. 1 And murthered.] That he was murdered is, however, doubtful. 2 The said Urban.] Rather by Joanna's rival, Charles of Durazzo, whose father Louis had been slain in prison by her order. 3 Bishop Aquilonensis.] Stephen, bishop of Aquila, in Apulia. 4 Theodoricke Niem.] De schismate inter Urbanum vi. et Clementem Anti- papam. Norimbergae, 1592. foi. 6 I here pretermit.] That incidentally, through God's mercy, certain bene fits arose from this schism to the progress of the reformation, we have Wick liffe's own testimony. See Wilkins's Concilia, vol. iii. p. 341, note. JOHN WICKLIFFE. 211 ferring them, who covet to be certified more amply herein, unto the three bookes of the said Theodoricke above mentioned. About the same time also, namely about three yeares after, there fell a cruell dissension in England, betweene the common people and the nobilitie, the which did not a little disturbe and trouble the common wealth. In this tumult, Simon of Sudburie, archbishop of Canterburie, was taken by the rusticall and rude people, and was beheaded6. In whose place after, succeeded William Courtney, which was no lesse diligent than his prede cessor had been before hira, in doing his diligence to roote out hereticks. — Notwithstanding, in the mean season Wickliffes sect increased privilie, and daily grew to greater force, until the time that William Barton, vicechancellor of Oxford, about the yeare of our Lord 1380, had the rule of that universitie ; who calling together eight monasticall doctors, and four other, with the con sent of the rest of his affinitie, putting the common seale of the universitie unto certaine writings, set forth an edict ', declaring 6 Was beheaded.] He was beheaded by the rebellious populace under Wat Tyler and Jack Straw, June 14, 1381 ; and the temporalities were delivered to William Courtney, Oct. 23, in the same year. Le Neve's Fasti, p. 7. 7 Set forth an edict.] The value of Wickliffe's labours in the cause of true religion, cannot be better understood than by inspecting this censure which was directed against him. It is confined solely to the controversy on the Eucharist; and declares, in opposition to the assertions of Wickliffe, " that the true faith is, that by the sacramental words duely pronounced by the priest, the bread and wine upon the altar are transubstantiated, or substan tially converted into the very body and blood of Christ ; so that after conse cration, there do not remain in that venerable sacrament the material bread and wine, which were there before, according to their own substances or na tures, but only the species of the same, under which species the very body of Christ and his blood are really contained, not only figuratively or tropically, but essentially, substantially, and corporally ; so that Christ is there verily in his own proper bodily presence." — Lewis's History, p. 82 ; Wilkins's Con cilia, vol. iii. p. 170, 7l. The Register tells us, that upon pubhc promulgation of this edict in the schools of the Augustin Friars, Wickliffe, who was pre sent, and in the theological chair, was thrown into confusion ; but soon re covering himself, he declared, that neither the chancellor, nor any of his friends, could refute by argument the doctrines against which they had pro nounced their edict ; thus showing himself an obstinate heretic. His appeal, not to his ordinary or the pope, but to the king's majesty, thereby acknow ledging the royal supremacy in causes ecclesiastical, as well as civil, gave still further very great offence. And the Register does not scruple to brand this deference to the secular power, with the name of heresy. In the same place the duke of Lancaster is commended highly for his desertion of Wick- r 2 212 JOHN WICKLIFFE. unto every man, and threatning them under a grievous penaltie, that no man should be so hardie, hereafter to associat themselves with any of Wickliffes fautors or favourers : and unto Wickliffe himselfe hee threatned the greater excommunication, and further imprisonment, and to all his fautors, unlesse that they, after three daies canonicall admonition or warning, as they call it, peremp tory, did repent and amend. — The which thing when Wickliffe liffe in this extremity ; and his attachment to the true faith is extolled, be cause he commanded him to abstain from intermeddling any more with the doctrine of this sacrament. Wickliffe however did not obey the duke's in junction, but in somewhat more covert terms maintained his former opinions. He refused the authority of all the fathers after the first thousand years from Christ, affirming that they had all erred in treating of the Eucharist except Berengarius ; and set at nought the authority of the Master of the Sentences- Sudbury's Register, in Wilkins, vol. iii. p. 171. Upon this slight foundation some writers have been pleased to say, that Wickliffe gave way, and made a full retractation. (Anth. a Wood, Antiq. Oxon. p. 189.) And even Fox, just below, speaks of his "qualifying his assertions." We see that it was not so understood at Lambeth. The council of Constance also, as we shall find afterwards, passed a very different judgment respecting the final conversion of Wickliffe. Nor does the other opinion accord with what Wood tells us in the same page, that this confession was encoun tered by no less than six several antagonists, immediately after its publication. The Confession, which is a large and very interesting document, is given at full length in the original Latin by Lewis, Records, No. 21. p. 323 — 32. Romish writers, when it suits their purpose, continually elevate the merest trifles into a formal recantation. The popish author of The Life and Death of Bishop Fisher, under the assumed name of Thomas Bailey, D.D., does not scruple to speak in the following harsh and vulgar metaphors. " The first un clean beast that ever passed through the oxens-ford (I mean Wickliffe by name) afterwards chewed the cud, and was sufficiently reconciled to the Roman faith, as appears by his recantation ; living and dying conformable to the holy cathohc church, at his parsonage of Lutterworth in Leicestershire ; constantly saying mass unto his dying day. So that reformation, as it seems, was left unto the time of which it is said, V