YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY This book was digitized by Microsoft Corporation in cooperation with Yale University Library, 2008. You may not reproduce this digitized copy ofthe book for any purpose other than for scholarship, research, educational, or, in limited quantity, personal use. You may not distribute or provide access to this digitized copy (or modified or partial versions of it) for commercial purposes. THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL JANSENIUS, BISHOP OF YPRES FROM AN ENGRAVING BY W. „. DOES AFTER THE MINTING DY PHILIPPE DE CHAMMGKi THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL BY LILIAN REA WITH TWELVE ILLUSTRATIONS NEW YORK CHARLES SGRIBNER'S SONS 1912 TO MY MOTHER PREFACE " Croyez-moi, il faut choisir entre Dieu et le monde, entre la beaute 6ternelle et la vaine apparence. . . . C'est quelque chose de vrai et de serieux qu'il nous faut pour vivre et pour mourir." La Duchesse de Broglie AFTER the lapse of centuries, when Pain, Sorrow, Struggle, Disappointment, and Weariness have been swallowed up in the Eternal Abyss, the picturesque side of a religious movement stands out to the impartial student of history in all the glory of prismatic colours. And, regarding it from a sociological and literary point of view, that which lends it interest and sympathy — is Enthusiasm. Nor is Enthusiasm used lightly in connection with religion, for the very etymology of the word justifies the application. Derived from the Greek evdovs, or evffeos, that is, " full of the god," it may be interpreted to mean having a god within. It was one of the phases of this creative emotion which produced the society of solitaires or recluses who in the early seventeenth century associated themselves with the Abbey of Port -Royal, and formed with the original convent of nuns an organization which assumed a vast significance in the religious history of France. In an age of the extreme of earthly pomp and grandeur, the high ideals and unselfishness of these " Aristocrats of Catholicism," as they were called, were doubly conspicuous ; but, aside from any religious point of view, a chronicle of the extraordinary ardour, both collective and individual, of men who, searching after a higher spirituality, left brilliant positions in the world to go into the Desert to meditate and pray, inspires viii THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL human interest still. For, thinking to lose their social signifi cance, they were in reality, both through their spiritual, literary, and pedantic sway, drawn back into the active life of their country. To them the profane history of the time of Louis xiv is indissolubly linked. Theologically, their religion was based on a dogma, called in derision by the outside world, Jansenism. Joseph de Maistre, in his book, Du Jansenisme ; portrait de cette secte, wrote sarcastically : " II n'y a point de Jansenisme — c'est une chim&re, une phantome cree par les Jesuites " ; and Mere Angelique for one always denied the term. In 1650 she spoke of the continued slanders against " those whom they call Jansenists," and five years later wrote to the Queen of Poland : " If it please your Majesty, in writing to His Holiness you might say that you have particular knowledge of the persons whom they call Jansenists, that they are no other than very Catholic and very much attached to the Holy See." In reality, while the dogma was a lifeless thing locked up in the Halls of the Sorbonne, the working out of the peculiar system of religion which the name Jansenism stands for went on regardless of theological disputes, alive and pulsating with vital fire in the Monastery of Port-Royal. Here, even in the midst of later trouble there was, says Sainte-Beuve, " in spite of everything, almost without interruption, the cloister, the sanctuary, the cell, and the grating for alms, the Christian practice of morals and the inviolable home of certain souls: the poor and silent study, the desert and the Grotto of Conferences near the Fountain of Mere Angelique, not far from the trees planted by the hand of d'Andilly." The Necrologe of Port-Royal and its Supplement are full of the most uncomplimentary allusions to the age itself, to which they attribute all the ills that happen to mortal flesh and blood, alluding constantly to the "press of the century"; the " unhappiness of the century " ; the " distractions and PREFACE ix corruption of the century " ; etc. Racine relates that Jacqueline Pascal early renounced the "vain amusements of the century"; while in one of her letters Mere Ang&ique declares that " In this miserable century, it seems that the Devil has had the power to snatch away the Gospel, or at least its practice, from almost all Christians." Thus, it was not strange that in contrast with the unrest, vice, and unreality which the time, age, and France itself exhibited, the Port-Royal of the Solitaires, as distinct from that of the nuns, with its simplicity, love of truth, lack of excitement, and quiet seemed a harbour of peace. Its Enthusiasts looked upon it, indeed, as an asylum or port — a sort of quiet backwater, where, after having solved life's enigmas, one could retire and spend the remaining years in contemplation of weathered storms. " M. de Bascle," says the Necrologe, " after having escaped the shipwrecks of the century, retired to Port -Royal as to a port, there to find his salvation in penitence." On the one hand, therefore, it was, in common with other religious movements, a spiritual balance - wheel ; on the other, an economic and social lever. Here the world ; there, the gifts of the spirit : Peace, Contentment, Heavenly Aspiration. But the condition attached to the acquirement of Peace, Contentment, and Heavenly Glory was Solitude — long hours of absolute loneliness, relieved by no earthly presence, no human touch, no conversation where mind sets fuse to fellow -mind to produce living thought, or to generate the electric current of sympathy. " The pleasure of solitude," exclaimed Pascal, " is an incomprehensible matter. I have discovered that all the misfortune of man comes from one thing, which is not to know how to remain in repose in one room." And only those who loved solitude could find at Port-Royal its heritage— Truth. It was love of Truth which in the beginning inspired Jansenius to create his interpretation of the Word in x THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL the quiet and isolation of the old town of Ypres in Belgium ; love of Truth again induced the Abb6 de St. Cyran, on his part, to go out into the world, to gather together and practically direct the realization of the brain aspirations of both himself and his friend. Studying the history of Port-Royal, we marvel to-day in the twentieth century, as did Pere Quesnel in the beginning of the eighteenth, that after having sustained the monastery for a hundred years, God should have permitted "this sanctuary of Truth and Charity to have been destroyed like a nest of error by the first ministers of the Church." Yet, though the Enthusiasts of Port-Royal ostensibly failed in their object of reforming the Roman Church from the inside, their attempt went far toward advancing the progress of humanity. A knowledge of their successes and failures should, therefore, be both a lesson and an inspiration. For Art and Religion are, after all, the things that eternally endure. Ever far away from kings and politics, ministers and functionaries, ideals and springs of character lie deep down in the heart of creation where, undisturbed by change of race or dynasty, the Earth Spirit weaves the garment of human life and history. L. R. PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I EMBRYONIC PORT-ROYAL 1610-1636 CHAP. I. The Infancy of Jansenism — How a Friendship brought forth a Religion . . . . ,3 II. The Letter of the Law— The A ugustinus of Cornelius Janssen . . . . . . .12 III. Port-Royal and the Arnaulds— Port-Royal a Three fold Force . . . . . .22 IV. Mere Angelique's Conversion and the Reform of Port-Royal des Champs . . . -34 V. Meeting with St. Cyran— Foundation of Port-Royal de Paris. . . . . . .41 VI. The Rule of St. Cyran begun . . . .48 PART II PORT-ROYAL IN ITS GREATNESS 1636-165 3 I. The First Solitaires and their Enthusiasms . • S7 II. Return of the Solitaires to Port-Royal des Champs, and Early Days there . . . • 71 III. Death of Jansenius and St. Cyran . .80 IV. A Trio of Devotes at Port-Royal de Paris— I. La Princesse de Guemene . . . .90 V. A Trio of Devotes at Port-Royal de Paris— II. Marie DE GONZAGUE . . . . . -99 VI. A Trio of Devotes at Port-Royal de Paris — III. La Marquise de Sable ..... 106 VII. The Letter of the Law again. Beginning of Persecu tion. The "Book of the Frequent Communion" . 117 VIII. Immediate Effect of the "Book of the Frequent Communion" on Port-Royal . . . -125 IX. Les Petites Ecoles — I. History, Masters, and Methods . ...... 133 I. The Peace of the Church — Death of Madame de Longueville ...... 269 I. Racine's Quarrel and Reconciliation with Port- Royal ....... 276 III. Persecution resumed ..... 288 IV. Port-Royal in Conflict with Philosophy . . 295 V. Arnauld's Death— His Successors : Quesnel, Du Guet, and Boileau ••....' 303 VI. The Literary Glory of Port-Royal— Pascal and Racine: The PensAes and Athalie . . .311 VII. Last Struggle against Persecution, and the Passing of Port-Royal . VIII. Port-Royal of To-Day 3i9 329 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Jansenius, Bishop of Ypres .... Frontispiece From an Engraving by W. A. Does, after the Portrait by Philippe de Champagne pacing PAGE Mere Angelique, Abbess and Reformer of Port-Royal . 34 From Van Schuppen's Engraving of the Portrait by Philippe de Champagne The Abbe de St. Cyran . . . , 50 After the Portrait by Philippe de Champagne Antoine Le MaItre, Port-Royal's First Solitaire . .58 After the Portrait by Philippe de Champagne Antoine Arnauld . . . . . .118 From a Bronze Bust in the Louvre Arnauld d'Andilly . . . . . .130 From an Engraving by J accrues Lubin Plan of Port-Royal des Champs . . . • 154 From an Engraving by Magdeleine Hortemels Blaise Pascal . . . . . . .174 From Edelinck's Engraving of the Original Portrait by Quesnel xiv THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL FACING PAGE Mere Agnes and S(eur Catherine de Sainte-Suzanne . 212 From the Ex-Voto of Philippe de Champagne in the Louvre ; , Anne Genevieve de Bourbon, Duchesse de Longueville . 274 From an Engraving by Waltener Pasquier Quesnel , , ,04 From an Engraving by N. Petau Two Views of Port-Royal des Champs . . .332 I. The '-'¦ Solitude " II. The Cloister From Engravings by Magdeleine Hortemels THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL PART I EMBRYONIC PORT-ROYAL 1610-1636 CHAPTER I THE INFANCY OF JANSENISM— HOW A FRIENDSHIP BROUGHT FORTH A RELIGION " II faut travailler a realiser en nous-mgmes notre id6al ; sans quoi la vie est une degringolade continue ; et comme les orangs, aprds avoir com- mencer par la gentillesse, nous finissons par la brutalite." Prudhon IN the latter days of Henri iv two students, whose friend ship was to mean much in the religious history of France, were studying theology in the Belgian town of Louvain. The elder, born in 1581 at Bayonne in Southern France, of distinguished and wealthy parents, was no other than Jean du Verger de Hauranne, afterward famous as the Abbe de Saint-Cyran ; the younger, born in 1585 at Arkoy in Holland,1 near Leerdam, the son of poor and humble people, was Corneille Janssen, no less noted as Jansenius. Most unlike both in fortune and character, these two young men seemed framed each to complement the other. It is not quite certain when their friendship began, or whether they had more than a casual acquaintance in Louvain, but in this little University centre each of them experienced the influence which decided his later development ; here, by different means, both were directed into similar paths of thought. Even as a youth, Jansenius showed a marked desire for study, and although very poor, managed to get to the University of Utrecht, where he began his higher education under both Catholics and Protestants, studying the Humanities under the former, Rhetoric and Dialectic under the latter, 1 Or Acquoy. Clemencet in his Histoire' Gkntrale de Port-Royal (iii. 225) says Jansenius was born at Leerdam itself. 3 4 THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL thus early learning the principles and habits of thought of each sect. Unfortunately, after some time these studies were inter rupted by lack of means. To augment his resources, Jan senius was forced to leave Utrecht and work at the first thing that offered — a carpenter's bench. As soon as he had earned enough for his purpose, he went back to Utrecht, and eventu ally to Louvain, where he continued his studies. At this period he first took the name of Jansenius — i.e. son of Jean * — and became acquainted with the Jesuits. Tremendously interested in their methods and principles, he begged to be taken into the Order. What was his surprise, however, when, after having accepted his friend, Othon Zilly, whom he him self had converted to Jesuitism, the Society refused his membership, alleging that he was adapted by neither mind, health, disposition, nor constitution to become one of them.2 While this seeming injustice enraged Jansenius, it was at the same time the means of attracting to him the notice of a learned doctor of Louvain called Jacques Jonsson, a bitter enemy of the Jesuits, and a friend of Baius, the great cham pion of Grace 3 in the Schools. Through Jonsson and Baius, Jansenius was thenceforth turned from the Jesuits, and interested in St. Augustine, whose tenets these two professors 1 Clemencet, iii. p. 225. 2 Rapin, Histoire de JansSnisme (Abb6 Domenech), p. 8. 3 " Grace " being the corner-stone, as it were, of Port-Royal, it may be well at the outset to try to explain its meaning. The strict dictionary de finition is : "A supernatural gift of God freely bestowed upon man for the merits of Christ " (Blunt, Dictionary of Theology, p. 746). According to St. Augustine, it is : " that which heals the soul from the vice of sin " (De Spiritu et Lettera). St. Francois de Sales said : " Inasmuch as Divine Love embellishes our soul, it is called Grace, rendering us agreeable to His Divine Majesty" (Introduction a la Vie divote). In his Traiti sur la Pauvreti, St. Cyran thus expressed himself : " One could not define Grace in abridgement better than to say it is an empire and a sovereignty over all the things of the world." Following out this idea, one of the Confessors of Port-Royal defined Grace as " The sovereignty of God over men and the submission of men to God " (Recueil de Plusieurs Pieces pour servir a V Histoire de Port-Royal, P- 199)- Mere Angelique declared : " Grace is humble and the principle of humility. And humility is inseparable from gentleness " (Mimoires et Relations p 101). Lastly, according to Pascal, Grace was the second birth of the soul (Pensies, p. 359). " THE INFANCY OF JANSENISM 5 taught. Jacques Jonsson is said to have given Jansenius three things which influenced his life : 1. A profound aversion for the Jesuits. 2. An enthusiastic admiration for the Doctor of Grace, St. Augustine. 3. A sympathy for Baius, whom he looked upon as a defender of St. Augustine, and a victim of the Jesuits.1 It was after this disappointment with regard to the Jesuits that, being advised on account of poor health to try the milder air of France, in 1604 Jansenius left Louvain and went to Paris. De Hauranne's experience was quite other than that of Jansenius, principally because his material circum stances were more fortunate. At the age of twenty or twenty-one, he had already had a varied course of study, and was fully embarked on his theological career, having become acquainted with the Humanities in his home at Bayonne, before spending some time at the Sorbonne in Paris. Under these conditions, it was conceivable that his object in visiting Louvain was uniquely because of its University, at that time conceded to be the foremost in Europe. But instead of joining any of the forty-three colleges, in which were assembled over four thousand students from all over the world, or taking advantage of its very noted Faculty of Theology, De Hauranne entered the College of Jesuits. Here he soon gained distinction by his attainments, and when in 1604 he delivered an Essay on Scholastic Philosophy, he at tracted the notice of one of the Judges, the celebrated Juste Lipse. The salient quality of this " King of Humanism," who represented at Louvain the element hostile to the traditional philosophy, was a tremendous depth and breadth of thought, which carried him out and away from orthodox beliefs of his day into the realms of creative imagination. While recognizing the value of Aristotle and the Peripatetics, then considered the only guides in Ethics, or with out combating Christianized Aristotelianism or Scholastic 1 Jansenius, ses Dernier 's Moments, p. 91. 6 THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL Theology,1 Lipse wished to introduce the comparative study of all schools : " If," he exclaimed, " it is necessary to belong to any school, there is but one which I wish to enter, and that is the Eclectic." A warm friendship gradually grew up between the famous philosopher and the young theological student from Bayonne, and although by some critics the teaching of Lipse is thought to have seduced the latter, Pere Rapin tells us that as Lipse himself was affable and civil, he endeavoured to soften and refine his rather uncouth pupil, to sweeten his character as it were by inculcating in him an affection for the humanities " which polish manners." Lipse's advice was cast on broad hnes. Above every thing he counselled De Hauranne to curb the native fire of his disposition by the study of the " Divine Science," and to embellish his spiritual life by the wealth of belles lettres fur nished by the Ancients. In other words, the Good, the True, and the Beautiful were to be combined, and the Early Fathers of the Church to be consulted for principles both of Reform and Renaissance, as well as for a basis of Theology.2 In 1605, De Hauranne also left Louvain and went to Paris in pursuit of further knowledge. On arriving there, he and Jansenius met again, and through his influence Jansenius became tutor to the son of a high official, thus earning enough to keep himself while continuing his studies at the Sorbonne. On his part, De Hauranne, not exposed to the same necessities, had leisure for literary and other experiences. The details of the life of neither student at this period are well known, but an incident told of Port- Royal's future director is interesting as marking a contrast in his character and mental development. The story brings us in familiar contact with Henri iv, who, talking one day with some of the cavaliers of his court, in reminiscence of past experiences in war, put the question 1 Hallam defines Scholastic Theology as an " endeavour to arrange the orthodox system of the Church such as authority had made it, according to the rules and methods of the Aristotelian dialectics, and sometimes upon premises supplied by metaphysical reasoning" (Literature of Europe, vol. i. P- 30). 2 Rapin, Histoire du Jans&nisme, p. 36. THE INFANCY OF JANSENISM 7 as to what they would have done if, losing the battle of Arques, and obliged to put to sea with their leader in a small boat, they had been carried off by the tempest and left to starve. One of the cavaliers replied that he would have killed himself rather than let his liege lord die of hunger. This statement raised a grand debate on the subject of suicide. One of the courtiers, called the Comte de Cramail, brought the matter to his friend De Hauranne for his opinion, and was so charmed by the answers given that he begged their author to write them down. In 1609, therefore, De Hauranne published a pamphlet called : " Question royale et sa decision," in which he not only said that under certain circumstances it is permissible to take one's own life, but that sometimes it is obligatory.1 This pamphlet was afterwards unearthed by enemies, and cited against its author. In reality it was simply a youthful indiscretion, such a doctrine as the justification of suicide being entirely contrary to the teachings of St. Augustine. In his Cite de Dieu, the latter says expressly that it is not allowable to kill oneself, for thereby one opens the way to the greatest of all evils, sin. It is not known what Jan senius thought of this his friend's first publication, but as it was written before their mutual exhaustive studies, he pro bably paid no attention to its character. In any case, each student continued in Paris the tendencies begun in Louvain, and it was a similarity of ideals which finally drew them closely together. In the University of the metropolis they found the teaching less broad than at the Belgian town, and were struck with the fact that the most learned Doctors there did not go back to the Fathers, but were still holding to and teaching the Scholastics. The un- satisfactoriness of this method induced in both Jansenius and De Hauranne a growing desire to revive the true doctrine. Each, therefore, prepared himself to combat the old school, and De Hauranne was about to hold a conference on the "Summary of St. Thomas," when the assassination of Henri iv, by exciting public opinion against the Jesuits, turned thoughts in another direction. 1 Question Royale, p. 32. s Book i. p. 29. 8 THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL This event also determined the future movements of the two friends. De Hauranne decided to return to Bayonne, where the death of his father made his presence necessary at the moment ; and on arrival there, secluding himself in the neighbouring family country house of Champire or Champirat, on a height overlooking the sea, he devoted himself body and mind to the study of Antique Christianity in general and St. Augustine in particular. It was not long, however, before he felt the need of a congenial companion to share his solitude, and learning of the breakdown in health of Jansenius, he wrote begging the Belgian to come and visit him. On this invitation, Jansenius at once went to Bayonne (1611), and for six years he and his host carried on there an exhaustive study of the Fathers of the Church with the hope of discovering the real sources of the old Christian spirit.1 Soon their attention was concentrated on St. Augustine, in whom they felt they had discovered all they had sought; and so great was their enthusiasm for this Saint that they finally determined to devote their lives to the explanation and dissemination of the Augustinian doctrines, which to them seemed to incorporate the whole teaching needed for the regeneration of mankind. De Hauranne was of course the dominant spirit. His was indeed a rough nature — a characteristic product of that Basque country from which he sprang. In the Jesuit colleges where he was educated, his schoolmates considered him a restless spirit, vain and presumptuous, somewhat fierce and uncommuni cative : at best, very eccentric in his manners and habits.2 Of fine health, great vigour, filled with an insatiable desire for knowledge, regardless of the ill-health and impaired vitality of his companion, he acted on Jansenius like a relentless schoolmaster, prodding his pupil on to more and more labour. But, in spite of peculiarities which seem the reverse of genial, Jansenius was not, as he himself said, one of those men who are made to be pedants all their lives. Although a somewhat weaker character than De Hauranne, he was at the same time infinitely more human, albeit also distinguished by rugged perseverance and obstinacy. His talent, we are told, lay not so much in Divine illumination as in a peculiar 1 Clemencet, Histoire Ginirale de Port-Royal, iii. p. 227. 2 Rapin, Histoire du Jansenisme, p. 30. THE INFANCY OF JANSENISM 9 assiduity in making the most of the light which he had. At times his temper and impetuosity were those of a raging lion : " I am like inflamed saltpetre, which burns up for an instant, and then dissipates without leaving either odour or smoke," 1 he said humorously. The life of the two students was sedentary in the extreme, their only exercise being the game of battledore and shuttle cock, in which they grew very expert, and in which they indulged between two Chapters of the Fathers ! Jansenius' enthusiasm, in fact, became so great that he scarcely ever went to bed at all, but spent his days mostly in an old chair which De Hauranne had had fitted up with cushions and a writing-desk for him.2 In this seat, he read, wrote, ate, and slept — that is, between times, rarely more than four hours out of the twenty-four. Madame de Hauranne used to say to her son that he would " kill this good Fleming by dint of making him study." 3 It was therefore fortunate when after a time both scholars became engaged in the world about them, the former being made Canon of the Bayonne Cathedral, the latter Principal of a College founded by the bishop of the town. Even then, they had little intercourse of any kind in the world outside their work, and although neither was a monk, both apparently shunned female society. At first in his own family, and afterwards in his active life as a priest, De Hauranne was necessarily brought into contact with women, all of whom adored while they feared him, but at no epoch of his life did the feminine element seem to have entered into the environ ment of Jansenius. He indeed fled any personal relationship with the sex, trying even when he was dying to refuse the ministrations of sisters of charity, and confessing that since the age of fifteen he had never been in need of any service from a woman.4 His idea of the utility of women was evi- 1 Ellies Du Pin, Histoire EccUsiastique du XVII Siecle, ii. p. 12. 2 Clemencet, Histoire LitUraire de Port-Royal, p. 14. 3 Clemencet, Histoire G&nirale de Port-Royal, p. 228. 4 Sainte-Beuve, Port-Royal, vol. ii. p. 93. C16mencet says in his Histoire Gbnbrale de Port-Royal (iii. p. 232) : " On ne lui a jamais reproche sur ses mceurs," and this in spite of Pere Rapin's scandalous stories of Jansenius' connection with a fascinating devote in Brussels (Histoire du Jansinisme, p. 268). 10 THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL dently akin to that embodied in plain words by the Jesuit Pere Garasse : " Of my fashion of writing I shall say but one word : I try to write concisely, and without disguise of metaphor as much as possible. I know that the thing is not easy, for I believe that it is with metaphors as with women — they are a necessary evil." x In 1617, Jansenius left Bayonne, and went back to Louvain, where he was made Principal of the new College of Holland called " La Pulcherie," and where in 1619 he received his doctor's degree. Leaving Bayonne at the same time, De Hauranne went to Poitiers, where he became Canon of the Cathedral, after which he was made Prior of Bonneville, and finally in 1620 he obtained the Abbey of St. Cyran in Brenne on the frontier of Touraine, Berry, and Poitou. From thence forth, De Hauranne, Twentieth Abbot of the. Monastery, was known as the Abbe de St. Cyran. As a last remembrance of Jansenius' personality, a com parison has been drawn by Sainte-Beuve between him and St. Francois de Sales and St. Cyran.2 If asked, says the his torian, what attribute of God struck him most, St. Francois might characteristically have replied : " Charity of the Son, Charity, Humility ! " while St. Cyran's answer would have been : " Power — that terrible power of the Father ! Abyss !. Eternity ! " Actually confronted with this question one day, it is chronicled that Jansenius exclaimed : " Truth ! " 1 Port-Royal, i. p. 303. The feminine influence was generally shunned by the solitaires at Port- Royal, even the Great Arnauld, who upheld Boileau in his Satire ou Women, felt with the Satirist that virtuous women were rare, and that it was better to avoid the sex altogether. " Sans doute, et dans Paris, si je sais bien compter, 11 en est jusqu'a trois que je pourrais citer." Satire X. CEuvres, Boileau. 2 Port-Royal, vol. i. p. 302. THE INFANCY OF JANSENISM il " Truth is what he meditated continually : he sought it night and day in study ; and in rare moments of laxness, when he walked in his garden, one could sometimes hear him cry aloud, as with a deep sigh he raised his eyes to heaven : ' O truth ! O truth ! ' " i 1 Clemencet, Histoire Gtnlrale de Port-Royal, iii. p. 231. CHAPTER II THE LETTER OF THE LAW— THE AUGUSTINUS OF CORNELIUS JANSSEN "J' The Letter killeth, but the Spirit giveth life," said St. Augustine. " . . . O ye sages of the Academy, is there no certainty that men may grasp for the guidance of life ? Nay, let us seek more earnestly and never despair." " Le Jansenisme est l'heresie le plus subtile que le Diable ait jamais tissue." TO understand the ideas of Jansenius and St. Cyran, we must consider for a moment the circumstances which caused their revolt, and the events of the troubled sixteenth century which preceded them — of that epoch which saw the birth of both Renaissance and Reform, and which has been called the most dramatic in history : ' ' Two great events dominated and filled it . The Renaissance which illumined and the Reform which soaked it in blood." 1 A modern French writer 2 analyses the pursuit of the Good, the True, and the Beautiful as the three objects of civilization. In France all would have been well could Renaissance, as typifying the Beautiful, but have united with Reform, anxious to become the incarnation of the Good and the True. Curiously enough these two movements, though originally interdependent, soon began to oppose one another. And whereas at first Reform made use of Renaissance to give it wings with which to fly,3 it soon combated everything 1 Comte Leo de Poney, Vie de Marguerite d' AngouUme. 2 Maulde de la Claviere, Louise de Savoie et Francois I"". 8 Through its incitement to a study of the classical tongues, Renaissance also opened the way to an investigation of the Scriptures by laymen, making comparisons between the Catholic faith and the religions and philosophies of other lauds possible. Thus, unconsciously, Renaissance produced the revolt called the Reformation. THE LETTER OF THE LAW 13 that Renaissance taught. To its stern votaries, Art and the Beautiful were snares of the Devil. Blinded, moreover, by their hatred of the abuses which had crept into the Roman Church, the first French Reformers could see no difference between Pagan ideology and that of Rome. On the one hand, all the old Pagan gods were huddled together with the row of Saints and Martyrs of the Roman Church, while on the other, majestic and awe-inspiring, Jesus Christ stood alone.1 During the long wars of religion which followed the reign of Francis the First, by a policy of sweet and tolerant methods which distinguished acts from intentions,2 the Roman Church regained the greater part of her former dominion in France. Yet even the submission of Henri iv — his " saut perilleux," as he called it, — could not stifle the revolt, and the beginning of 1600, although signalized by the apparent victory of Catholicism, found the country in a state of religious unrest. For though the practice of the Reform had often been bigoted and narrow in the extreme, its principles were those of that eternal freedom toward which the human mind has ever aspired. Thus, whatever victories the Catholic Reaction, or Counter Reformation, may have entailed to the Established Church, the progress of human thought, once awakened, was ever striving for liberty, and religious emancipation was written on the book of the future in France as elsewhere in the thinking world. In vain had fanatics — themselves also animated, be it said, by true sentiments of loyalty and patriot ism — lighted the fires which burned the works of Luther before their beautiful Cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris. In vain they had banished Lefevre, Farel, and Calvin from their native land. The ideals of religious independence taught by these men had survived through a century of war and bloodshed, and were pointing to a freer and more spiritual Catholicity — again to be purified by another Renaissance and another Reform. On his accession to the throne, three tasks had lain before Henry iv : the re-establishment of authority in the govern ment, of prosperity in the country, and of peace in men's 1 J. H. Merle d'Aubigne, V Histoire de la Reformation du XVI Siicle, iii. p. 72. 2 The famous Casuistry afterward combated by Pascal, 14 THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL minds.1 During a short twelve years (for if was not until 1598 that both he and France could stop to take breath) this great king had nobly fulfilled the first two requirements. France had nearly recovered from the devastating wars, the throne was all-powerful. As to the third ."'condition— to secure peace, Henri iv had renounced deep 'religious con victions and vowed to live and die a Catholic At a time when no other country in Europe knew how to practise tolerance, he had brought back the Jesuit to France, and by the Edict of Nantes assured safety to the Huguenots, even allowing the latter to hold office under the government, thus apparently giving religious liberty to France. And yet, although for this heritage of humanity left him by his grandmother, Margu6rite d' Angoul&ne, he paid the price of his life, he had not been able to bring peace to men's minds. The victorious Cathohc Church itself was in a state of great danger, all the more menacing because the evil came from within.2 Its factions were already quarrelling among themselves. The Royal Cathohcs — or those who had sided with Henri iv against the League — advocated the right of self-government by national churches. The ancient Leaguers, on the other hand, looked upon the Pope as the fountain of ecclesiastical power, and wanted no other dominion. The one represented the Gallican, the other the Ultramontane party. Properly speaking, the Sorbonne, as acknowledged Judge of the Church, should have settled all theological disputes. But in 1600, like the country and the nobility, weakened by the Wars of the League, the Sorbonne had lost its backbone. The rise of this Faculty of Theology of the Paris University had been very rapid. Founded in the time of Louis ix, shortly afterward, through its introduction of the Scholastic Theology, it had become so famous as to overshadow and lend distinction to the whole University. But since then it had made mistakes. It is true that in 1469 it had been the means of bringing printing into France, yet it had stubbornly opposed the Renaissance,8 fiercely combated the Reform as well, and justified the Massacre of St. Bartholomew. By this time theological discussions had so invaded the outside 1 Lavisse et Rambaud, Histoire de France, vol. 6. ii. p. 22. 2 Sainte-Beuve, Port-Royal, vol. i. p. 7. 8 Cabantous, Marguerite d'AngouUme et les Debuts de la Reforme, p. 37. THE 'LETTER OF THE LAW 15 world that both belief and action seemed paralysed, and scholars began to wonder what indeed the spiritual founda tions of Catholicism were. Palpably the store of ancient piety and wisdom underlying its great edifice must still be there, but how revive and vivify it ? To resolve the problem, three sincere Churchmen, destined during the next fifty years to exercise a tremendous influence in the religious world, met together the year after the murder of Henri iv, when for the moment the star of the Jesuits had paled. Each had his individual idea for the restoration of a pure Catholicism ; each set about in his own way to put it into execution. M. de Berulle, believing that learned priests could by their example and teaching disseminate the leaven of holiness, founded the Oratory ; M. Vincent de Paul, with the idea of instructing people in the provinces and abroad, insti tuted the association of missionaries ; M. Bourdoise, to whose mind the remedy lay in reforming the clergy, assembled a new spiritual body of priests in the monastery of St. Nicolas du Chardonnet.1 It was eight years later, when Richelieu's star was just appearing on the horizon of the Court, that Jansenius and St. Cyran reached in Bayonne the solution of their inquiry into the cause of the corruption in the Church. Their studies had not by any means led them into a desire to leave the Roman Faith. On the contrary, like that early reformer, Marguerite D'Angouleme,2 sister of Francis the First, they were alone possessed with a longing to bring about the purification of an institution to which they clung with all their instincts. The cause of the corruption lay, they felt, 1 Sainte-Beuve, Port-Royal, Discours Pr61iminaire. It was at this same epoch that Madame de Chantal, under the inspiration of St. Francois de Sales, founded the Convent of the Visitation, which was also to cope with the corruption of the day by attracting souls through the tender lenient side of .Christianity. 2 If Francis the First brought Italy to France and gave his country that taste and distinction in Letters and the Arts which has since never left it. Marguerite combined in her personality the ideal of the Good, the True, and the Beautiful. She had come to the New Religion through the inspiration of Renaissance, and as her ideal was that of maintaining the unity of Catholicism by infusing into it the tenets of the Reform, she was practically a forerunner of the Jansenists, therefore to them the central figure of the sixteenth century. (See the various lives of this princess by Cabantous, Felix Frank, Sainte-Beuve, etc.) 16 THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL in a strange forgetfulness of earlier stricter principles ; the remedy, in a renaissance of the teachings of St. Augustine, Bishop of Hippo, whose symbol in the ideography of the Roman Church to-day is a flaming heart, his title " Doctor of Grace." Born in Africa twelve centuries before the era of Jansenius and St. Cyran, this father of the Early Church had fought and won his battle of the soul in the little pagan country of Greece, whence had afterward come the revivifying inspiration toward literature and art . His spiritual development had been through the religion of the Manichees — a material scheme which sym bolized spiritual things in the earthly — and by way of Plato, whobyappealing to the intellect taught man to look beneath the materialistic. After Plato, examination of the deeper strata of Ethics led him to that high ideal which Christianity stands for. To use his own words : " The light of peace was shed upon my heart and every shadow of doubt melted away." * Thus it was through mystic depths that his inner being had blossomed out into the clear radiance- of a Christianity ruled over by Divine Grace, and which " understood invisible things by the visible." His dogma was based on the idea of universal guilt as the result of Adam's sin — a guilt which entails on the human race bodily infirmity and death.2 Pelagius, an English monk born on the same day as the African Father, and educated in theology originating in Pales tine, was the great contemporary opponent of the Augustinian ideas. He denied that the Fall had annihilated Free Will, and contended that Man was able without any assistance to perform the commandments of God. Sin was, therefore, not an infirmity of human nature, but of the will. In thus up holding the greatness of human nature, the Pelagians not only upset the whole scheme of redemption in Christ, but rendered priesthood unnecessary. To St. Augustine this heresy was most terrible, and it was for combating it and the Pelagians in general that he received the title of Doctor of Grace.3 1 Confessions, Book viii. p. 288. 2 Blunt's Dictionary of Doctrinal and Historical Theology, p. 558. 8 Strangely enough in St. Augustine's century, the fourth, the Christian Church was fighting almost the same problems as those facing it again at THE LETTER OF THE LAW i? Although they were but partially understood, the writings of St. Augustine exercised a great and lasting influence on the early Church.1 St. Thomas d'Aquin, who lived nine centuries afterward (1227-1274), was the first priest to sustain the Augustinian ideas on Grace and Predestination. His " Summary of Theology " followed the Scholastic method, and his principles were adopted by the Church without any real comprehension of the meaning of the word " Grace." It is said that after leaving Bayonne, Jansenius became more and more absorbed in the study of St. Augustine, until he neglected his work at the College, and even feared being called to a chair in the University lest it should disturb him in his one preoccupation.2 He said he could have passed his life agreeably on a desert island with his copy of St. Augustine as his only companion. With characteristic impetuosity, he forgot the necessity of a balance-wheel, and threw himself exclusively into the works of the " Doctor of Grace." 3 Not content with reading all of St. Augustine's writings through once, he read them each ten times, the treatises against the Pelagians thirty times. The outcome of this fascination, almost become an obsession, can be seen in a letter written to St. Cyran in March 1621, wherein he declares his astonishment at the height and breadth of St. Augustine, and the fact that his doctrine is so little known among learned men, not only of his (Jansenius') century, but of past ages. In the same letter, Jansenius confesses that until his ideas are quite formulated he dare not tell any one what he thinks about many subjects of the times, especially Grace and Predestination.4 the beginning of the seventeenth. To combat these evils, the Fourth Century Church had fixed its mind on three things : 1. The Christology of revealed religion. 2. Church Authority and Discipline. 3. Human Nature in its relation to Divine Grace. See Blunt's Dictionary of Doctrinal Theology. 1 A very recent Jansenist historian, Jules Paquier, says : " The writings of St. Augustine and particularly those on Grace have had an influence without parallel in the Latin Church ; after the Apostles, he was the great luminary of the Church" (Le Jansinisme, p. 39). 2 It was not until 1630 that the King of Spain made him Professor of Scriptural History in the University of Louvain (Ellies Du Pin, Histoire EccUsiastique, ii. p. 5). 8 " Which," he said, he read with " un etrange desir et profit." 4 For Letters of Jansenius, see La Naissance du Jansinisme dicouverte, by le Sieur de Preville, 18 THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL Not having met since 1617, both Jansenius and St. Cyran had for some time been anxious for an interview in which they could discuss these subjects so near the heart of each. In 1621, when this long-looked-forward-to meeting took place at Louvain, they came to an understanding as to their great project, and the means by which they might propagate the Doctrine of Grace as they understood it. It was decided that in secret Jansenius should prepare an exhaustive work as the basis of principles which St. Cyran should work out in practice. On his part, at this very meeting, St. Cyran dic tated the forms and heads of the Chapters for the Letter of their Law to be called the Augustinus, and it was agreed, as their combined writings were intended to express a whole, that St. Cyran's pen name should be " Aurelius." Together they thus completed the Latin name of St. Augustine, Aurelius Augustinus. Sainte-Beuve tells a delightfully poetic, if not absolutely historic, story (confirmed by Clemencet) of the next meeting of the friends, two years later, at Peronne, a town on the frontier of Belgium. Here, he says, " Jansenius arrived on horseback, the evening of 29th April, in order to enter France with the month of May." x Alas ! in spite of the love of nature displayed by Jansenius on this occasion, there is little of the gaiety of Spring in the work which the two enthusiasts again discussed in this second interview : it is sombre with the earnestness of November and the falling leaf, and has no hint of the joy of life, or of pure beauty as such. The poetry of existence, indeed, would seem to cling not to its admonitions, but to its mistakes. After 1623, Jansenius and St. Cyran had other fleeting glimpses of each other, St. Cyran re- visiting Louvain on one occasion, but most of their subsequent intercourse was by letter. For twenty years Jansenius worked on his book, and in writing it he believed his doctrine to be not only sound but orthodox. Twice he submitted it to the Pope, and in the Prologue of the whole work he asserted that he had not taught " what is true or false, or what one may hold or reject accord ing to the doctrine of the Catholic Church, but what St. Augustine has contended one must believe." 1 Port-Royal, i. p. 303. THE LETTER OF THE LAW 19 In the Augustinus, therefore, employing neither the scholastic nor the academic, but the historical method,1 he endeavoured to recover and demonstrate the doctrine of St. Augustine. One part of the thick in-folio volume is given over to a history of Pelagianism and Semi-Pelagianism. The second treats of the state of man before the Fall, and his actual present state. The third goes into a long discussion of possible cure and the Grace administered by Jesus Christ. In his Preface, describing the idea of Pelagius, the author confessed that without very special Divine Grace it would be difficult to avoid being partly seduced at least by the " fatal sweetness " of the doctrine. Later on he turned his criticism, not against the modern Semi-Pelagians — under whom were understood the Jesuits and especially the Molinists 2 — but against Theo logians in general, who in their ideas had drifted absolutely away from St. Augustine, and who even while keeping in their hearts as Cathohcs the Christian faith, had lost sight of every thing ennobling from Hope and Nature to Grace — whether of angels or men, and under whatever name soever, sufficient, efficacious, operative, co-operative, predisposing, subsequent or exciting. Insensible to all these things, they followed neither the Old nor the New Testament.3 Unhappily, the Latin form of the book and the heated manner of the arguments did not make for clearness, although the style of the work itself is, according to critics, at times " most brilliant, arresting attention by a sort of theological beauty, of a Miltonian if not a Dantesque depth of sutble thought." * The Augustinus was in reality so abstruse that soon Jan senius' enemies contended that he had not understood St. Augustine at all. Moreover, a great deal of this lack of lucidity was attributed to indigestion of the subject-matter. In common with most writers on theology, Montaigne's rather 1 Which, says Sainte-Beuve, " he accompanied and sought to explain by the psychological and metaphysical Christian method " (Port-Royal, ii. p. 99). 2 Followers of Molina, a Spanish Jesuit, author of a book called Concord between Grace and Free Will. In this book Molina sustained that grace never lacked any one and that the Will was always free to receive or reject all the graces. 8 Sainte-Beuve, Port-Royal, ii. p. 127. * Ibid. p. 97. 20 THE ENTHUSIASTS OF PORT-ROYAL Rabelaisian advice might with profit have been given to Jansenius : " Order a purgation for your brain ; it will be better employed than for your stomach." x The greatest crime of which Jansenius was accused was that of putting into the words of his model St. Augustine the principles of pure Calvinism. As Michel le Vassor ex pressed it : " Jansenius read St. Augustine with the spectacles of Calvin." 2 What gave colour to this accusation was the fact that in his L' Institution Chretienne, Calvin cites St. Augustine con stantly as his authority on Predestination and other points. Critics overlooked the fact, however, that on leaving the Roman Church, the great Reformer threw off Penitence, the Eucharist, etc., as vain forms, keeping to but " one universal sacrament," that of the Scripture itself. Jansenius, on the contrary, was very tenacious of all the sacraments of the Church, being unorthodox, or rather Gallican, in the one particular alone : his lack of faith in the infallibility of the Pope. It is also very misleading to students of these controversies that confidence in St. Augustine was not con fined to Jansenius and Calvin ; the Jesuits also recognized him as sound, and the Papal See never denied the orthodoxy of the Augustinian doctrine. Gibbon saw the incongruity of the dispute, and in his Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire said humorously : " The Roman Church has canonised St. Augustine and crushed Calvin. However, as the difference of their opinions is imperceptible even with the aid of a theological micro scope, the Molinists are overwhelmed by the authority of the Saint, and the Jansenists are dishonoured by their resemblance to a heretic. . . ." 3 In any case, whatever Jansenism appeared to the different sects, its founders intended it to be a pure renaissance of the spirit of the Early Fathers and the ancient dogma and 1 Causeries d'un Curieux, Feuillet de Conches, ii. p. 7. * Sainte-Beuve, Port-Royal, ii. p. 106. 8 J6»